HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-26-19 - Agenda Pkg - Special CC Mtg
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
City of Hermosa Beach
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Special Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, March 26, 2019
5:30 PM
Closed Session - 5:30 P.M.
Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
City Council
Mayor
Stacey Armato
Mayor Pro Tem
Mary Campbell
Councilmembers
Hany S. Fangary
Justin Massey
Jeff Duclos
City Clerk City Treasurer City Attorney
Elaine Doerfling Karen Nowicki Mike Jenkins
Executive Team Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
Nico De Anda-Scaia, Assistant to the City Manager
Viki Copeland, Finance Director Ken Robertson, Community Development Director
Lucho Rodriguez, Acting Public Works Director Vanessa Godinez, Human Resources Manager
Sharon Papa, Police Chief Kelly Orta, Community Resources Manager
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
5:30 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION
(LOCATION: Meetings convene in the Council Chambers and move to the Second Floor Conference
Room after Public Comment)
CALL TO ORDER IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENT
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION IN SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
1. 19-0193 MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on March 12, 2019.
2. 19-0194 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Government Code Section 54957.6
City Negotiator: City Manager
Employee
Organizations: Hermosa Beach Police Officers’ Association
Teamsters Union, Local 911
Professional and Administrative Employee Group
Hermosa Beach Management Association
Unrepresented Employees
3. 19-0195 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Initiation of Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session
will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation.
Number of Potential Cases: 1
4. 19-0196 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Workers Comp Litigation
The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open
session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation.
Existing Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
a) Name of Case: Robert Higgins v. City of Hermosa Beach
WCAB Number: ADJ11093995
b) Name of Case: Todd Lewitt v. City of Hermosa Beach
WCAB Number: ADJ9858468, ADJ11019071, ADJ10177518
c) Name of Case: Rachel Muzatko v. City of Hermosa Beach
WCAB Number: ADJ10866914, ADJ10822138
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
d) Name of Case: Pamela Sargent v. City of Hermosa Beach
WCAB Number: ADJ11290398
ADJOURNMENT OF CLOSED SESSION
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
7:00 P.M. - REGULAR AGENDA
All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda
item. City Council agenda packets are available for your review on the City's website located at
www.hermosabch.org. Complete agenda packets are also available for public inspection in the Police
Department, Hermosa Beach Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk.
During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer or you can access the
packet at our website, www.hermosabch.org, on your laptop, tablet or smartphone through the wireless
signal available in the City Council chambers - Network ID: CHB-Guest, Password: chbguest
Written materials pertaining to matters listed on the agenda of a regular City Council meeting must be
submitted by noon of the Tuesday, one week before the meeting in order to be included in the agenda
packet (tentative future agendas can be found as Item 8 in every regular agenda packet). However,
written materials received after that deadline will nonetheless be posted under the relevant agenda item
on the City's website at the same time as they are distributed to the City Council by email and provided
to the City Council and the public at the meeting.
Submit your comments via eComment in three easy steps:
Note: Your comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name,
but please do not provide any other personal information (i.e. phone numbers, addresses, etc) that you
do not want to be published.
1. Go to the Agendas/Minutes/Video webpage and find the meeting you’d like to submit comments
on.
Click on the eComment button for your selected meeting.
2. Find the agenda item for which you would like to provide a comment. You can select a specific
agenda item/project or provide general comments under the Oral/Written Communications item.
3. Sign in to your SpeakUp Hermosa Account or as a guest, enter your comment in the field provided,
provide your name, and if applicable, attach files before submitting your comment.
eComments can be submitted as soon as the meeting materials are published, but will only be
accepted until 12:00 pm on the date of the meeting to ensure Council and staff have the ability to
review
comments prior to the meeting.
Persons who wish to address an issue of general nature (not pertaining to matters listed on the
agenda) to the City Council for the official record may submit written material to the Council in lieu of or
in addition to speaking under the Public Participation section of the meeting. Such written
correspondence must be delivered to the City Manager's office (anny@hermosabch.org) by noon of the
Tuesday, one week before the regular Council meeting in order to be included in the agenda packet.
To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices (ALD) will be
available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting,
you must call or submit your request in writing to the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0203 at least
48 hours prior to the meeting.
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
CLOSED SESSION REPORT
ANNOUNCEMENTS
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS
a) 19-0198 RECOGNIZING EARTH HOUR ON MARCH 30, 2019 FROM
8:30 P.M. - 9:30 P.M. AND EARTH DAY ON APRIL 22, 2019
b) 19-0199 PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL AS
“DONATE LIFE MONTH”
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments,
the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter
not listed on the posted agenda as a business item.
1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: This is the time for members of
the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's
jurisdiction not on this agenda, on items on this agenda as to which public
comment will not be taken (Miscellaneous Items and Reports – City Council and
Other Matters), or to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar.
Public comments on the agenda items called Miscellaneous Reports and Other
Matters will only be heard at this time. Comments on public hearing items are
heard only during the public hearing. Members of the audience may also speak:
1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar;
2) during Public Hearings; and,
3) during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. Comments from the
public are limited to three minutes per speaker. The City Council acknowledges receipt
of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in
written communications. The Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral
and written communications for a future agenda. Citizens with comments regarding City
management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to
the City Manager.
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
a) 19-0203 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the written communication from
Howard Longacre.
Attachments: Letter from Howard Longacre regarding cell tower and H2O Hotel Project
2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted
upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council.
There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member
removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered
under Agenda Item 4, with public comment permitted at that time.
a) REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
19-0183 (Deputy City Clerk Linda Abbott)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following minutes:
1. Adjourned Regular meeting of March 9, 2019
2. Regular meeting of March 12, 2019
Attachments: 1. 030919 draft min.docx 2. 031219 draft min.docx
b) REPORT CHECK REGISTERS
19-0168 (Finance Director Viki Copeland)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the following check registers.
Attachments: 1. 02-26-19 2. 02-28-29 3. 03-07-19
c) REPORT REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT,
19-0188 AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR FEBRUARY 2019
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the February 2019 Financial
Reports.
Attachments: 1. Feb 2019 Revenue Report 2. Feb 2019 Expenditure Report 3. CIP Report by Project- Feb 2019
d) REPORT CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT
19-0189 (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki)
Recommendation:City Treasurer recommends that the City Council receive and file the February 2019
City Treasurer's Report and Cash Balance Report.
Attachments: 1. February 2019 Treasurer's Report 2. February 2019 Cash Balance Report
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
e) REPORT CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS
19-0190 (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki)
Recommendation:City Treasurer recommends that the City Council approve cancellation of certain
checks.
f) REPORT PROJECT STATUS REPORT AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 2019
19-0185 (Acting Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Project Status Report as of
February 28, 2019.
Attachments: 1. CIP Status Sheet - March 2019.pdf 2. 2018-19 Capital Improvement Program
g) REPORT ACTION SHEET OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
19-0208 MARCH 19, 2019
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the action sheet of the Planning
Commission meeting of March19, 2019.
Attachments: Planning Commission Action Sheet 3-19-19
h) REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
19-0207 (Community Development Director Ken Robertson)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the April 16, 2019 Planning
Commission tentative future agenda items.
Attachments: Planning Commission Tentative Agenda for 4-16-19.pdf
i) REPORT CLARIFICATIONS TO PROCESS AND STANDARDS
19-0186 FOR REVIEW OF ON-SALE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
(Community Development Director Ken Robertson)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council affirm the attached clarifications to the
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) review process.
Attachments: Proposed amendment with PC additions
j) REPORT ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION
19-0206 MEETING OF JANUARY 16, 2019
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Public
Works Commission meeting of January 16, 2019.
Attachments: PWC action minutes 1-16-19
k) REPORT AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND
19-0137 INSPECTION SERVICES CONTRACT TO TRANSTECH
ENGINEERS, INC. FOR CIP 17-687 AND CIP 18-691,
ADA IMPROVEMENTS ON PROSPECT AVENUE
(Acting Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez)
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Award the Professional Service Agreement for Construction Management and
Inspection Services for CIP 17-687 and CIP 18-691 for ADA Improvements on Prospect
Avenue, in the amount of $40,460;
2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement and the City Clerk to attest subject to
approval by the City Attorney; and
3. Authorize 25% project contingency for a total contract budget of $50,575.00.
Attachments: 1. RFP 2. Draft PSA.pdf 3. Proposal and Fee
l) REPORT AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR CIP 17-687
19-0184 AND CIP 18-691, ADA IMPROVEMENTS ON PROSPECT AVENUE
(Acting Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Award a construction contract for CIP17-687 and CIP 18-691 for ADA Improvements
on
Prospect Avenue in the amount of $141,900.00;
2. Adopt the attached resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Hermosa Beach Approving the Construction of CIP 17-687 and CIP 18-691 ADA
Improvements on Prospect Avenue;
3. Authorize the Mayor to execute the construction contract and the City Clerk to attest,
subject to approval by the City Attorney;
4. Authorize the Acting Director of Public Works to establish a 25% project contingency
for a total construction budget of $177,375; and
5. Authorize the Acting Director of Public Works to file a Notice of Completion following
final completion of the project.
Attachments: 1. Bid Opening 2. Draft Agreement 3. Draft Resolution
m) REPORT BROWN ACT COMPLAINT FILED BY ANTHONY HIGGINS
19-0197 (City Attorney Mike Jenkins)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Receive and file this report; and
2. Direct the City Attorney to send a letter (Attachment 2) pursuant to Government Code
�54960.1 (c)(2) communicating the City Council's determination that no Brown Act
violation occurred and therefore that the City Council will not cure or correct the
challenged actions.
Attachments: 1. 02-25-19 Higgins Brown Act Cure and orrect Demand Letter-c2.pdf 2. Proposed Response to Mr. Higgins' letter.pdf
n) REPORT RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT CLAIM
19-0180 (Human Resources Manager Vanessa Godinez)
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council reject the following claim and refer it to the
City's Liability Claims Administrator.
Claimant: Stephen Allan Diamond
Date of Loss: August 22, 2018
Date Claim Filed: December 31, 2018
Date Revised Claim Filed: January 28, 2019
Allegation: Claimant alleges he stepped into a hole in the walkway near a parking meter
at Hermosa Ave. and 26th Street which resulted in physical injuries to his ankle.
Attachments: Stephen Allan Diamond_claim
o) REPORT A RESOLUTION OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY
19-0192 COUNCIL ELECTING TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Find that the following proposed action is exempt from review pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines
Section 15061(b)(3);
2. Adopt the following Resolution waiving further reading: a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, electing to be exempt from the
Congestion Management Program.
Attachments: 1. Government_Code_Section_65088.3-Opt_Out_Provision.pdf 2. Resolution.docx 3. Metro Board Report with Attachments – June 20 2018.pdf 4. Metro CMP Opt-Out FAQ Sheet.pdf
p) REPORT NORTH SCHOOL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
19-0204 SUBCOMMITTEE AND MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FULFILLMENT OVERSIGHT ROLE
(City Manager Suja Lowenthal)
Recommendation:The North School Reconstruction Project Subcommittee (Subcommittee) members
recommend that the City Council authorize the Subcommittee to continue to serve as
the Council's representatives on the joint City and Hermosa Beach City School District
collaborative charged with overseeing the fulfillment of the North School Reconstruction
Project Memorandum of Understanding executed on February 27, 2019.
Attachments: 1. Link to North Elementary School Project Memorandum of
Understanding - 02-27-19
2. Link to City Council 02-26-19 Meeting - Item 6b
q) REPORT APPROVAL OF LETTER OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 377
19-0187 (GARCIA): MICROENTERPRISE HOME KITCHEN OPERATIONS
(Assistant to the City Manager Nico De Anda-Scaia)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign a letter
of opposition on behalf of the City regarding Assembly Bill 377 (AB 377) related to
permitting and regulation of microenterprise home kitchen operations, to be shared with
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
key legislators and local stakeholders.
Attachments: 1. Draft Letter of Opposition to AB 377 2. AB 377 - Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations
3. AB 626 - California Retail Food Code: Microenterprise Home Kitchen
Operations
3. CONSENT ORDINANCES
NONE
4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M.
NONE
6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS
a) REPORT GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
19-0191 (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Proceed with a project at the existing Greenbelt location; or
2. Proceed with a project at an alternative location within the City's jurisdiction that
would capture and treat the equivalent volume of stormwater; or
3. Initiate a dissolution or an amendment of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
to negotiate a suitable substitute or revised MOU and project with the City's partners,
relinquish the Grant and forfeit the grant funding.
Attachments: 1. D1712669_Executed Agreement.pdf 2. Approved MOU_Cost Sharing (Signed).pdf 3. Link to Project Page and Presentations 4. 2018-06-19-CommunityMeeting_TtSlides (061818).pptx 5. EH-SiteEvaluation-Option2-TT.pdf 6. EH-SiteEvaluation-SouthPark.pdf 7. EH-SiteEvaluation-Option3-TT.pdf 8. Alternative Sites_Hermosa Beach (100918).pdf 9. Memo_HB and RB collaboration (3).pdf
10. RE Inquiry on Potential Use of SCE RW - CatalinaHerondoN
Francisca - City of Redondo Beach.msg
11. SD2-AlondraPark.pdf
7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS - CITY
COUNCIL
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
a) 19-0200 COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY PROVIDES UPDATE
ON MEETING WITH SENATOR SCOTT WIENER’S
LEGISLATIVE AIDE TO DISCUSS SENATE BILL 50
Attachments: 1. SB 50 Fact Sheet.pdf 2. SBCCOG Opposition Letter 2-20-19.pdf 3. Link to Bill Text and Information
b) 19-0201 UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES
AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES
8. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items. No discussion or
debate of these requests shall be undertaken; the sole action is whether to schedule the
item for consideration on a future agenda. No public comment will be taken.
Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items.
a) 19-0202 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the tentative future agenda
items.
Attachments: Tentative Future Agenda.pdf
ADJOURNMENT
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
FUTURE MEETINGS AND CITY HOLIDAYS
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS:
April 9, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
April 23, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
April 24, 2019 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - FY 2019-2020 Capital Improvement Program
April 30, 2019 - Tuesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Budget Revenue Strategy
May 1, 2019 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Study Session
May 14, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
May 22, 2019 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Budget Workshop
May 28, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
June 5, 2019 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Study Session
June 11, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
June 25, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
July 9, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
July 18, 2019 - Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Joint Meeting with All Boards and Commissions
July 23, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
August 13, 2019 - Tuesday - No Meeting (Dark)
August 27, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
September 4, 2019 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Study Session
September 10, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
September 24, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
October 2, 2019 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Study Session
October 8, 2019 - Tuesday - No Meeting (Re-scheduled to Oct. 10)
October 10, 2019 - Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Closed Session and 7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
October 22, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - CONTINUED:
November 6, 2019 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
6:00 PM - Study Session
November 12, 2019 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session,
7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
November 18, 2019 - Monday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Closed Session and 7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
November 21, 2019 - Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Mayor Rotation
November 26, 2019 - Tuesday - No Meeting (Re-scheduled to Nov. 18)
December 4, 2019 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Study Session
December 10, 2019 - Tuesday - No Meeting (Re-scheduled to Dec. 12)
December 12, 2019 - Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Closed Session and 7:00 PM - City Council Meeting
December 24, 2019 - Tuesday - No Meeting (Dark)
BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS:
April 2, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting
April 16, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting
May 6, 2019 - Monday - 7:00 PM - Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission Meeting
May 7, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting
May 15, 2019 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting
May 21, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting
June 4, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting
June 18, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting
July 2, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting
July 8, 2019 - Monday - 7:00 PM - Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission Meeting
July 16, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting
July 17, 2019 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting
August 6, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting
August 20, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting
September 3, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting
September 9, 2019 - Monday - 7:00 PM - Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission Meeting
September 17, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting
September 18, 2019 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting
October 1, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting
October 15, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting
November 4, 2019 - Monday - 7:00 PM - Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission Meeting
November 5, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting
November 19, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting
November 20, 2019 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting
December 3, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting
December 9, 2019 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting
CITY OFFICES CLOSED FRIDAY-SUNDAY AND ON THE FOLLOWING DAYS:
May 27, 2019 - Monday - Memorial Day
July 4, 2019 - Thursday - Independence Day
September 2, 2019 - Monday - Labor Day
November 11, 2019 - Monday - Veteran's Day
November 28, 2019 - Thursday, Thanksgiving Day
December 25, 2019 - Wednesday - Christmas Day
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
January 1, 2020 - Wednesday - New Year's Day (2020)
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
19-0198
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
RECOGNIZING EARTH HOUR ON MARCH 30, 2019 FROM
8:30 P.M. - 9:30 P.M. AND EARTH DAY ON APRIL 22, 2019
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
19-0199
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL AS
“DONATE LIFE MONTH”
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
19-0203
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the written communication from Howard
Longacre.
Attachments:
Letter from Howard Longacre
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the 7-PM, March 26, 2019 Regular
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting’s Agenda Item -1 “Oral/Written Communications”
Page 1 of 12
City Manager's office and City Clerk: Please include this written communication with
the 7-PM, March 26, 2019, Regular City Council meeting agenda under Item-1,
“Oral/Written Communications”. Thank You.
March 18, 2019
To: Hermosa Beach City Council (Stacey Armato, Mary Campbell Collins,
Hany Fangary, Justin Massey, and Jeff Duclos), City Clerk, and City Manager.
From: Howard Longacre, Hermosa Beach Resident.
Re: 1) Toddlers and young children being in significantly-close proximity to radiation
emanating from a radio-frequency-transmitting monopole, street-light-disguised, cell-
tower (as first approved and then intensified-further-approved by the City) as located
on a commercial property containing a Pre-School at the South-East corner of
Aviation Blvd and Prospect Avenue.
Re: 2) Concerns re: The ‘H2O’ hotel project’s construction progress at 15th Street and
Hermosa Avenue.
Honorable Councilmembers and others:
The following comments by me are given freely, and they are entirely my
views and opinions on all that I've stated herein. Concerns raised within
this communication are for the benefit of all concerned, and are not
intended to disparage any property owner or business.
Re: 1) Toddlers and young children being in significantly-close proximity to radiation
emanating from a radio-frequency-transmitting monopole, street-light-disguised, cell-
tower (as first approved and then intensified-further-approved by the City) as located
on a commercial property containing a Pre-School at the South-East corner of
Aviation Blvd and Prospect Avenue.
Following at the end of this communication (is an included link) for reference to a recent
story reported on a CBS local station in the Sacramento, CA area. The story reminds one of
an ongoing situation right here in Hermosa Beach which appears to be far more significant
and dangerous in terms of children and especially toddlers who are being directly exposed
within approximately only 30 feet or less of a functioning monopole-cell-tower that also
transmits much lower to the ground than most cell towers do. I.e. Lower to the ground, and
also very close, approximately 30-linear-feet in distance or less to the presence of young
children and especially toddlers attending the preschool.
While it has been stated by many, supposedly-competent, “experts”, that cell tower radiation
is not a significant risk, it nonetheless is apparently a risk in many other “experts” view.
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the 7-PM, March 26, 2019 Regular
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting’s Agenda Item -1 “Oral/Written Communications”
Page 2 of 12
While radio-wave intensity declines rapidly, i.e. inversely-proportional to the square of the
distance (or radius) from its source, you likely would not choose to operate your microwave
oven without it being properly shielded to prevent the radio-frequency (RF) radiation from
exiting the oven. Nor would you likely choose to stand in front of, or even close to an active
aviation radar transmission. Thus a cell tower far up in the air, and perhaps also hundreds
of lineal feet away may not represent a significant health threat, i.e. as when compared to
the cumulative effects of ultra-violet radiation from the sun or even fluorescent lights.
However, having children under the age of ten routinely standing/walking within several feet
of the monopole-cell-tower in question (and as evidently having transmitters along most of
its vertical length), or possibly even worse, having unknowing parents dropping off toddlers
at the pre-school, five years of age and under, to play, and rest, for four or more hours per
day, perhaps five days a week, to then in fact be invisibly radiated at such a close distance
of approximately 30-feet from the subject monopole-cell-tower, leads one to ask if this is in
fact an unconscionable thing to be accepted by the City and School District. Is this not in
fact a significant potential future liability for the City, given their discretion over the location
of such cell tower?
This submittal is to in fact place on the record a reminder, should the city in the future
indicate that they were somehow not made aware of the preschool being located so close to
this transmitting cell tower, nor, not to mention the monopole-cell-tower’s close-proximity,
i.e., only a few feet away from a heavily utilized by young children, city public sidewalk.
Please note the following two Google street images that clearly show the subject beige-
painted monopole-cell-tower with its essentially-unneeded light on the top, i.e. to make it
appear like some kind of fat light pole. Note the added red-circles markings on the images.
The light at the top is evidently to fool people into not knowing really what this device
actually is. It’s an essentially meaningless light. And because it is a monopole-cell-tower
design, the transmitters inside the monopole extend vertically downward to a relatively low
point above the ground unlike other cell towers with their transmitters all mounted
completely high off the ground and then perhaps disguised as a palm tree, if at all.
Note the large box on the roof of the building in these images. It is believed to be a shroud
around all the equipment used to generate the radio waves (RF waves) to the transmitters
inside the (one assumes) plastic-shrouded fat monopole-cell-tower.
The preschool tenant was perhaps not presently located there when this monopole-cell-
tower was first permitted by the City. However the preschool was likely in existence when a
2nd city-approval allowed for additional transmitter intensification to be added to this
monopole-cell-tower. There were days when you could drive by and actually see all the
guts of this monopole’s insides, fully exposed at the time they were perhaps
installing/servicing the added transmitting equipment in same. It appeared to be jammed
full of transmitters/antennas from the top to bottom. Btw, there are some small, virtually-
unreadable labels on the side of this monopole-cell-tower.
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the 7-PM, March 26, 2019 Regular
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting’s Agenda Item -1 “Oral/Written Communications”
Page 3 of 12
Note in the two pictures, the two young children at the corner, perhaps walking to View
School. This is a Hermosa View School, supposedly “safe”-route-to-school. Young children
walk directly by the cell tower within a few feet and there’s usually a crossing guard at this
corner who also is routinely being subjected to this monopole-cell-tower’s RF radiation.
More discussion follows these images.
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the 7-PM, March 26, 2019 Regular
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting’s Agenda Item -1 “Oral/Written Communications”
Page 4 of 12
Questions thusly:
a) Would you have your toddler or child knowingly being radiated daily by this particular
cell tower at such significantly close range?
b) Are parents of toddlers that are being dropped daily at the pre-school even aware of
this monopole-cell-tower and its close proximity to where their toddler(s) will spend
perhaps 4 or more hours daily?
c) Has View School notified the parents of children who stand or walk near this cell
tower on their way to school of its existence?
d) Should it be a requirement that parents be notified if their toddlers attend the pre -
school or other ‘Art-Zone’ activities, or have young children routinely walking within a
few feet past this monopole-cell-tower, and perhaps also be required to sign a
statement acknowledging their awareness of the odd location of this City-approved
monopole-cell-tower?
e) What if anything is the City doing to correct this situation, given that they approved
this particular monopole-cell-tower for this location, i.e., so close now to where
children wait for the crossing light to go to View School daily, and toddlers spend
hours inside the preschool daily?
f) Should these things be of concern?
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the 7-PM, March 26, 2019 Regular
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting’s Agenda Item -1 “Oral/Written Communications”
Page 5 of 12
Check the Google street images carefully. Perhaps this particular monopole-cell-tower
should be relocated or even removed? This is of course all about money, and those with
the need for greed often perhaps need money first and only wait until later to be concerned
if their money-making is potentially at a significant cost to others? After all, such radiation,
as like UV radiation is supposedly a cumulative threat to one’s health; often taking time to
show up and then perhaps much too late to do anything about.
Again, the following linked story doesn't even seem to compare to the monopole-cell-tower
right here in Hermosa Beach at the S.E. corner of Aviation Blvd and Prospect Avenue,
where toddlers play and rest daily at the 'Art Zone' children's studio and preschool.
Note: If choosing to play the following brief story and video, please first review the second
item of this written communication, which follows immediately regarding the unfortunately
dysfunctional ‘H2O’ hotel construction project at 15th Street and Hermosa Avenue in
Hermosa Beach’s downtown. The following link is also at the end of this entire
communication.
‘Parents Blame Elementary School’s Cell Tower After 4th Student Diagnosed With
Cancer’ (Four children at the school have developed cancer.)
https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2019/03/12/school-cell-tower-causing-cancer/
Re: 2) Concerns re: The ‘H2O’ hotel project’s construction progress at 15th Street and
Hermosa Avenue.
The following image is extracted from a recent ‘The Beach Reporter’ newspaper full page
advertisement image detailed further below. Per the advertisement, the “H2O” hotel project
and property, as located at the South-West corner of 15th Street and Hermosa Avenue in
downtown Hermosa Beach, is apparently “available FOR SALE”.
During the March 12, 2019 Hermosa City Council Meeting a local resident
inquired during ‘Public Comments’ as to the ongoing situation regarding the ‘H2O’
hotel project’s ultra-slow construction.
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the 7-PM, March 26, 2019 Regular
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting’s Agenda Item -1 “Oral/Written Communications”
Page 6 of 12
The subject property, through its various owners since ‘Classic Burger’ and a
donut shop (former tenant businesses) were ousted and their business buildings
demolished some ten or more years ago, has been essentially an ongoing
eyesore and negative for the city.
In response to the resident's public queries, Councilman Jeff Duclos asked the
City Manager for a status update which she didn't have at the time, but which she
indicated she would bring back.
Sitting in an apparent slow state of construction / stagnation / construction,
the project, as located in such a dense residential / commercial area, should
long ago have been considered as having become a serious situation, and
possibly even by now, recognized as a public nuisance, due at the
minimum, to the serious fire potential the property now represents, i.e.,
during another upcoming hot spring or summer. Question: Does the
project have any kind of working fire sprinkler system at this point? It
would appear to be one large mass of neglected kindling-wood just waiting
for an ignition source.
The developer probably has fire and liability insurance, however is it in such an
amount to cover a disaster spreading to other properties on a hot, windy day
when a fire in such an area could escalate to burning down half or more of the
dense beachfront area. Imagine such a fire i.e. during one of the multi-per-year
Chamber of Commerce Fiesta-s with all the streets congested and blocked with
street vendors, tens of thousands of transient people, and more.
From the time of the originally approved ‘Boardroom office/commercial condo’
project for that property, which then went bankrupt or something, to the next
owner of the property, who then desired to build parking lots for the bar-hoppers,
that the city didn't desire to approve, to the present real-estate broker/developer
then acquiring the property, it again now appears to be in a financial quagmire.
The property appears to represent little more than pipe-dreams of riches gone
astray for all concerned, including the City of Hermosa Beach.
This is just another example of why the City should never allow the over-the-top
massive-massive-massive land-aggregating and Beach-
Drive-closing, proposed hotel-and-multiple-bars abomination (to be located at the
Strand and Pier Plaza) to see the light of day. Such project is way too high-
density and intensive, completely out-of-scale for Hermosa Beach, and
represents little if anything but another need-for-greed attempt by a few.
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the 7-PM, March 26, 2019 Regular
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting’s Agenda Item -1 “Oral/Written Communications”
Page 7 of 12
With respect to the ‘H2O’ hotel project’s construction-stagnation, following are
some Google street-map views (with dates) of its progress. Note: The project
was originally titled the ‘CLASH’ hotel which was an extremely poor choice of
name. The name was then changed to ‘H2O’ when it had to reapply for its
approvals after doing nothing for two years. This name now seems ironically to
reflect that it’s apparently drowning in debt.
Following the Google images is a full-page snag-image as present in the real-
estate advertisements of the March 7, 2019 online and hard-copy ‘The Beach
Reporter’ newspaper. The advertisement evidently lists four of the developer’s
commercial involvements, including the unfinished subject ‘H2O’ hotel property
itself, now apparently also “available FOR SALE”.
The ‘H2O’ hotel, as big as it is, nonetheless is a mere fraction of the size of the
Strand & Pier proposed high-density over-the-top proposed-PIG-monstrosity to be
destroying Hermosa’s downtown and setting the entire downtown up to be
systematically demolished and replaced with other similar gargantuan, land-
aggregating, over-the-top, ultra-high-density ‘plasticville’-crapola. A Pig-Crapola
proposal, that would never survive a vote of by the residents of the city.
All should remember the failed ‘Greenwood’, massive hotel proposal for
downtown Hermosa back in the late '80s. Fortunately the residents themselves
helped to kill that ridiculous oversized hotel pig-proposal. But then also, never
forget the ongoing albatross at 1601 Pacific Coast Highway, aka the ‘Hermosa
Pavilion’. How many bankruptcies has that monstrosity been through since it was
first approved by the City as one of the be-all, end-alls for the City back in the
1980s. Another pile of out-of-scale planning crap approved by the City. Pure
high-density way out-of-scale rotten planning that the City is now stuck with.
What is worrisome, given the grandiose representations made by the ‘H2O’ hotel
developer, during his follow-up for a second rubber-stamp approval, after his first
approval went unacted on by the developer for some two years, is what now
happens if the ‘H2O’ developer sells the present “vested” ‘H2O’ hotel project to
others who will just finish it to be a mediocre stucco box flop-house. Is the City in
a position to stop such from happening?
So much for the developer’s grandiose representations regarding the high-end
quality of construction to be accomplished? And what has happened to the hotel-
operator that was to be involved? Why hasn’t the council and the city apparently
been more-closely monitoring this developer, given the city approvals he’s been
granted? Why is there no performance bond for such projects? Could the same
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the 7-PM, March 26, 2019 Regular
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting’s Agenda Item -1 “Oral/Written Communications”
Page 8 of 12
thing happen with the monster crapola-pig-project proposed at the Strand & Pier
Plaza corner with that area now perhaps being set up for a decades-long disaster
when the next serious recession hits during its construction?
TEN PLUS YEAR EYESORE ON HERMOSA AVENUE AT 15th STREET:
Following are ‘H2O’ hotel construction project date-indicated Google street-
images, followed by the March 7, 2019 ‘The Beach Reporter’ real estate
advertisement offering some of the developer’s interests for sale.
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the 7-PM, March 26, 2019 Regular
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting’s Agenda Item -1 “Oral/Written Communications”
Page 9 of 12
1st image as from 14 months ago, Jan 2018. The ‘H2O’ 30-room hotel
construction. (Complete with trashy contractor signs all over it.)
2nd image from May 2017, about 22 months ago.
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the 7-PM, March 26, 2019 Regular
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting’s Agenda Item -1 “Oral/Written Communications”
Page 10 of 12
3rd image from July 2016, about 2 years 9 months ago.
4th image from Dec, 2011, about 7.25 years ago. (Long after Classic Burger
and the Donut Shop were un-ceremoniously kicked out and torn down)
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the 7-PM, March 26, 2019 Regular
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting’s Agenda Item -1 “Oral/Written Communications”
Page 11 of 12
In the following March 7, 2019 ‘The Beach Reporter’ page-53 advertisement the
commercial properties indicated, appear to all be properties that the ‘H2O’ hotel
developer has an interest in.
Note that in this advertisement the ‘H2O’ hotel developer appears to be now
offering to sell, from top to bottom;
1) the property he acquired immediately to the South of the ‘H2O’ hotel project,
2) the developer’s property on the East side of Hermosa Avenue,
3) the ‘H2O’ project & property itself (shown as a finished rendering),
4) and additionally, apparently the developer’s namesake property, ‘Chhabria
Plaza’ on the South-East corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Hawthorne Blvd in
Torrance.
--- Please continue to next page for the advertisement image ---
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the 7-PM, March 26, 2019 Regular
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting’s Agenda Item -1 “Oral/Written Communications”
Page 12 of 12
‘Parents Blame Elementary School’s Cell Tower After 4th Student Diagnosed With
Cancer’ (Four children at the school have developed cancer.) View the video.
https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2019/03/12/school-cell-tower-causing-cancer/
*** End of written communication. ***
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0183
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
(Deputy City Clerk Linda Abbott)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following minutes:
1.Adjourned Regular meeting of March 9, 2019
2.Regular meeting of March 12, 2019
Attachments:
The 2 sets of minutes listed above
Submitted by: Linda Abbott, Deputy City Clerk
Noted: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
City of Hermosa Beach
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Adjourned Meeting Minutes
Saturday, March 9, 2019
9:00 AM
CITY COUNCIL RETREAT
Location: The Beach House Hotel - Seaside Room
(1300 The Strand, Hermosa Beach CA 90254)
City Council
Mayor
Stacey Armato
Mayor Pro Tem
Mary Campbell
Councilmembers
Hany S. Fangary
Justin Massey
Jeff Duclos
City Council Adjourned Meeting Minutes March 9, 2019
Page 2 of 3
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL RETREAT AGENDA
The purpose of this retreat is to review Capital Improvement Programs,
discuss Department Priorities and set City Council Priorities
(8:30 A.M. - 9:00 A.M. Arrival & Breakfast)
9:00 A.M. - 9:20 A.M.
CALL TO ORDER 9:10 a.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Ken Robertson
ROLL CALL
Present:5 - Mayor Armato, Mayor Pro Tempore Campbell, Councilmember Fangary,
Councilmember Massey, and Councilmember Duclos
Absent:0
Staff in attendance: City Manager Suja Lowenthal, City Attorney Mike Jenkins, Assistant to the
City Manager Nico De Anda-Scaia, Community Development Director Ken Robertson, Human
Resources Manager Vanessa Godinez, Finance Director Viki Copeland, Acting Public Works
Director Lucho Rodriguez, Acting Police Chief Milton McKinnon, Environmental Analyst
Leanne Singleton, Emergency Management Coordinator Brandy Villanueva, and Executive
Assistant to the City Manager Ann Yang
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
Coming forward:
David Grethen
Trent Larson
9:20 A.M. - 9:50 A.M.
OPENING REMARKS AND SETTING THE STAGE
9:50 A.M. - 11:00 A.M.
1.REVIEW & PRIORITIZE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS
Attachments:1. CIP Status Sheet - February 2019.pdf
2. SUPPLEMENTAL CIP Status Sheet with revised budget (added
3-8-19 at 1pm).pdf
City Council Adjourned Meeting Minutes March 9, 2019
Page 3 of 3
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
3. SUPPLEMENTAL Letter from David Grethen (added 3-8-19 at
1pm).pdf
11:00 A.M. - 12:00 P.M.
2.DISCUSS PRIORITIES IDENTIFIED BY DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS
12:00 P.M. - 1:00 P.M.
WORKING LUNCH: CONTINUE DISCUSSION
1:00 P.M. - 2:30 P.M.
3.SET CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES FOR FY 2019-20 BUDGET
2:30 P.M. - 4:30 P.M.
4.DISCUSS BALLOT MEASURE
5.REPEAL AND REPLACE PERSONNEL RULES
6.DISCUSS POLICY MATTERS:
•Recognition of Limited Resources
•Donation Policy
•Fee Waiver Policy
•City Facility Leasing Policy
•New City Hall/Police Department Facility
•Other Policy Matters
4:30 P.M. - 5:00 P.M.
SUMMARY & WRAP UP
ADJOURNMENT 5:40 p.m.
Elaine Doerfling Linda Abbott
City Clerk Deputy City Clerk
City of Hermosa Beach
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Regular Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, March 12, 2019
6:00 PM
Closed Session - 6:00 P.M.
Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
City Council
Mayor
Stacey Armato
Mayor Pro Tem
Mary Campbell
Councilmembers
Hany S. Fangary
Justin Massey
Jeff Duclos
City Council Meeting Minutes March 12, 2019
Page 2 of 12
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
6:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION
(LOCATION: Meetings convene in the Council Chambers and move to the Second Floor Conference
Room after Public Comment)
CALL TO ORDER IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:3 - Mayor Armato, Mayor Pro Tempore Campbell, and Councilmember Duclos
Absent:2 - Councilmember Massey*, and Councilmember Fangary**
*Massey arrived at the start of Closed Session
**Fangary arrived at 6:10 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENT None
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION IN SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 6:01
p.m.
1.19-0153 MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on February 26, 2019.
2.19-0154 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Initiation of Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session
will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation.
Number of Potential Cases: 1
3.19-0128 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL:Non-Litigated Claims Update
Existing Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) and (e)(3)
The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session
will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation.
a) Claimant: Brian Anstey, Claim Number: 18-138992
Date of Loss: 6/26/2018, Date Filed: 11/19/2018
Allegation: Suspect in Redondo Police Department Chase damaged
Claimant’s fence
b) Claimant: Arlene Buschbach, Claim Number: 19-139883
Date of Loss: 10/27/2018, Date Filed: 1/22/2019
Allegation: Injuries suffered from fall due to broken pathway
c) Claimant: Nathan Carroll, Claim Number: 19-139480
Date of Loss: 8/26/2018, Date Filed: 12/31/2018
Allegation: Money and property stolen by security guard hired by City
City Council Meeting Minutes March 12, 2019
Page 3 of 12
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
d) Claimant: Jason Clark, Claim Number: 19-139872
Date of Loss: 7/2018, Date Filed: 1/23/2019
Allegation: Car accident was result of a blind spot that was reported to City
e) Claimant: Carissa De Blasi, Claim Number: 18-138649
Date of Loss: 6/18/2018, Date Filed: 11/6/2018
Allegation: Damage to Claimant’s vehicle caused by an asphalt company truck
f) Claimant: Stephen Allan Diamond, Claim Number: 19-139484
Date of Loss: 8/22/2018, Date Filed: 12/31/2018, Revised Claim: 1/28/2019
Allegation: Broken ankle due to hole in walkway
g) Claimant: Valerie Rhodes, Claim Number: 19-140423
Date of Loss: 9/1/2018, Date Filed: 2/25/2019
Allegation: Fractured foot and ankle due to trip/fall in park
h) Claimant: John Zamora, Claim Number: 18-134743
Date of Loss: 8/4/2017, Date Filed with Los Angeles County: 2/1/2018
Allegation: Failure to reasonably own, maintain, supervise beach and shoreline
4.19-0123 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL:Litigation Quarterly Update
Existing Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session
will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation.
a) Name of Case: BKK Working Group et al. v. City of Hermosa Beach et al.
United States District Court, Case Number: 2:18-cv-5810
b) Name of Case: Kerry Cartwright v. City of Hermosa Beach
Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: 18STCV05692
c) Name of Case: Hermosa Fitness LLC v. City of Hermosa Beach
Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: 18STCP02840
d) Name of Case: Mark Roth v. City of Hermosa Beach
Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: YC072628
e) Name of Case: City of Hermosa Beach v. Edward P. Zappia, The Zappia Law Firm
Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: BC709770
ADJOURNMENT OF CLOSED SESSION 7:00 p.m.
7:00 P.M. - REGULAR AGENDA
City Council Meeting Minutes March 12, 2019
Page 4 of 12
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
CALL TO ORDER 7:08 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Kim Taylor, Principal, Hermosa Valley School
ROLL CALL
Present:5 - Mayor Armato, Mayor Pro Tempore Campbell, Councilmember Fangary,
Councilmember Massey, and Councilmember Duclos
Absent:0
CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Jenkins said no public comment was received prior to Closed Session, no changes
were made to the agenda, and there were no reportable actions.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Armato announced the following upcoming community events:
*Saturday, March 16, 11 a.m.: The Chamber of Commerce will hold their annual St. Patrick’s
Day Parade, with over 100 local businesses, civic organizations and school marching bands
taking part in the seven-block parade down Pier Avenue and ending at the corner of Hermosa
Avenue and 10th Street. Come out and enjoy the family affair which has become a popular
tradition in Hermosa Beach, while also enjoying the great dining, shopping and beautiful beach
weather that Hermosa Beach has to offer.
*Monday, March 18, 7 p.m.: The City Council and School Board will be holding a joint meeting
in Council Chambers. The agenda will be posted by the end of day this Thursday.
*Saturday, March 23, 6-11 p.m.: Hermosa Beach Schools’ largest fundraiser, Hearts of
Hermosa, will take place at the Hermosa Beach Community Center, 710 Pier Avenue. It’s sure
to be an amazing night with many local food and beverage vendors, an auction, some March
Madness viewing, and celebrity DJ Daisy O’Dell. All proceeds go directly to the Hermosa
Beach Education Foundation. Tickets are on sale now at www.hbef.org.
*Saturday, March 30, 7 a.m.-12 noon: The Second Annual Community-Wide Garage Sale, with
dozens of concurrent garage sales throughout Hermosa Beach. If you are interested in hosting a
garage sale for your home, building, or neighborhood block, coordinate with your neighbors
and sign up on the City website. Additionally, the City has once again partnered with local and
national non-profit organizations to create a place where you can donate any unsold items the
same afternoon from 12 noon-4 p.m. Learn more about the event and register at
www.hermosabch.org/communitygaragesale.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
City Council Meeting Minutes March 12, 2019
Page 5 of 12
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
City Manager Lowenthal said item 6e would be continued.
Motion Campbell, seconded by Duclos to approve the agenda.
Aye:5 - Mayor Armato, Campbell, Fangary, Massey, and Duclos
Absent:0
PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS
a)19-0151 RECOGNIZING HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
AS THE NATIONAL FIRST PLACE WINNER OF THE SANDY
HOOK PROMISE 2019 START WITH HELLO COMMUNITY
REACH AND SUSTAINABILITY AWARD
Mayor Armato presented Certificates of Recognition to Hermosa Valley School Principal Kim
Taylor and Hermosa Valley School teacher Caitlin Fuller, and a City plaque to Superintendent
Patricia Escalante.
b)19-0150 RECOGNIZING SKYE FENTON FOR HER OUTSTANDING
EFFORTS TO HELP HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS THROUGHOUT
THE SOUTH BAY BY STARTING THE BACKPACK CLUB WHICH
DONATES STUFFED PACKS OF GOODS TO U.S. VETERANS
Mayor Armato presented Skye with a Certificate of Recognition and thanked her for inspiring
others to help those experiencing homelessness.
c)19-0152 CHAD RICHARDSON DONATES “PIER” CANVAS ARTWORK
TO CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Mayor Armato presented Mr. Richardson with a City Certificate which recognized his
generosity toward the City.
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER None
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
Coming forward:
Craig Cadwallader
Sheryl Main
a)REPORT WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
19-0156
Attachments:Letter from Tony Higgins regarding CEQA Safety and Hazards
City Council Meeting Minutes March 12, 2019
Page 6 of 12
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
Analysis for 27th Street.pdf
Coming forward:
Anthony Higgins
Motion Duclos and seconded by Massey to receive and file the written
communication.
Aye:5 - Mayor Armato, Campbell, Fangary, Massey, and Duclos
Absent:0
2. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Motion Massey and seconded by Duclos to approve the Consent Calendar.
Aye:5 - Mayor Armato, Campbell, Fangary, Massey, and Duclos
Absent:0
a)REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
19-0148 (Deputy City Clerk Linda Abbott)
Attachments:022619 draft min.docx
b)REPORT CHECK REGISTERS
19-0139 (Finance Director Viki Copeland)
Attachments:02-14-19
c)REPORT ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND
19-0159 COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION
MEETING OF FEBRUARY 5, 2019
Attachments:PR Minutes 02.05.2019.pdf
d)REPORT ACTION MINUTES OF THE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
19-0072 ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 7, 2019
Attachments:EPAC Meeting Minutes - Janaury 7, 2019
e)REPORT ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION
19-0138 ARTWORK FROM CHAD RICHARDSON
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
The artwork was valued at $200 by the artist-donor. It will be displayed at City Hall.
f)REPORT APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 74179
City Council Meeting Minutes March 12, 2019
Page 7 of 12
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
19-0140 AT 226 2ND STREET
(Community Development Director Ken Robertson)
Attachments:1. Proposed Resolution
2. Final Map No. 74179
g)REPORT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
19-0145 BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND
THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
(Acting Police Chief Milton McKinnon)
Attachments:1. Resolution-Tobacco Law Enforcement Program
2. Tobacco grant-HBPD MOU
h)REPORT APPROVE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL
19-0086 SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FILE KEEPERS, LLC FOR
DOCUMENT SCANNING SERVICES AND IMPLEMENTATION
OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
(Assistant to the City Manager Nico De Anda-Scaia)
Attachments:1. First Amendment to File Keepers, LLC Professional Services
Agreement
2. American Microimaging Inc. Professional Services Agreement
3. Contract Assignment Letter to File Keepers, LLC
4. Link to City Council 10-10-17 Meeting - Item 6c
5. Link to City Council 04-24-18 Meeting - Item 2j
6. Link to City of South Pasadena Site
3. CONSENT ORDINANCES None
4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION None
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a)REPORT CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE REGULATING
19-0141 SIDEWALK VENDING IN COMPLIANCE WITH SB 946
(Acting Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez)
Attachments:1. Sidewalk Vending Ordinance
2. Sidewalk Vending Administrative Fine Resolution
3. Sidewalk Vending Application and Renewal Fees Resolution
City Council Meeting Minutes March 12, 2019
Page 8 of 12
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
4. SUPPLEMENTAL eComment from Lori Ford (submitted 3-12-19 at
11:59am).pdf
5. SUPPLEMENTAL Letter from Downtown Hermosa Business
Association (submitted 3-12-19 at 1:22pm).pdf
6. SUPPLEMENTAL Letter from Chamber of Commerce (submitted
3-12-19 at 2:49pm).pdf
The Public Hearing opened at 8:51 p.m. Coming forward:
Carolyn Petty, Hermosa Chamber of Commerce
Andrea Jacobsson, Hermosa Chamber of Commerce
Maureen Hunt, President/CEO, Hermosa Chamber of Commerce
Bob Jones
Amanda Bauer, Hermosa Business Owner
Bob Jones
Gina Rothwell, Sol Baby Owner
Kathy Dunbabin
The Public Hearing closed at 9:13 p.m.
Motion Massey and seconded by Fangary to continue this item.
Aye:3 - Campbell, Fangary, and Massey
No:2 - Mayor Armato, and Duclos
Absent:0
6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS
a)REPORT MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2018-19
19-0101 (Continued from meeting of February 26, 2019)
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
Attachments:1. Revenue Detail Report
2. Additional Appropriations Report
3. Budget Transfers Report
4. Midyear Budget Summary Report
5. City Council Travel Summary 2018-19
Public comment:
Geoff Hirsch
Motion Duclos and seconded by Campbell to:
1. Approve the revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, budget transfers
City Council Meeting Minutes March 12, 2019
Page 9 of 12
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
and fund balances as shown herein and in the attached Revenue Detail Report,
Additional Appropriations Report, Budget Transfers Report, and Budget
Summary Report;
2. From the General Fund, approve the addition of $120,134 to the assigned fund
balance for Contingencies in order to meet the City's target of 16% for this goal;
add $21,731 to the Compensated Absences assignment to meet the City's goal
amount of 25% of the current liability; add $21,575 to the retirement rate
stabilization assignment;
3. Transfer the remaining funds available in the General Fund of $427,335 to the
Insurance Fund; and
4. Receive and file the attached information about City Council travel.
Aye:5 - Mayor Armato, Campbell, Fangary, Massey, and Duclos
Absent:0
Motion Duclos and seconded by Campbell to continue tonight's meeting to 11:30
p.m.
Aye:5 - Mayor Armato, Campbell, Fangary, Massey, and Duclos
Absent:0
b)REPORT
19-0045 PURCHASE OF POLICE DEPARTMENT VEHICLES
(Continued from meeting of January 22, 2019)
(Acting Police Chief Milton McKinnon)
Attachments:1. National Auto Fleet Toyota Tacoma
2. DriveClean.ca.gov-vehicle rating
3. 911vehicle Command Vehicle outfitting quote
4. Pictures of Buena Park command vehicle
5. Long Beach BMW motorcycle quote
Motion Massey and seconded by Duclos to authorize the purchase of the
following vehicles for the Police Department:
a. Three (3) 2019 Chevrolet Tahoe utility vehicles to replace existing Chevrolet
Tahoes, which include the Watch Commander HB9 vehicle, and Patrol vehicles
HB1 and HB5;
b. Two (2) 2019 BMW R1200RT-P motorcycles to replace two (2) Honda ST 1300
motorcycles; and
c. One (1) 2019 Toyota Tacoma pick-up truck to replace one (1) Ford Ranger P/U
truck for Parking Enforcement.
Aye:5 - Mayor Armato, Campbell, Fangary, Massey, and Duclos
Absent:0
c)REPORT CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL EVENT FEE WAIVER
19-0155 REQUESTS FOR HEARTS OF HERMOSA (MARCH 23);
City Council Meeting Minutes March 12, 2019
Page 10 of 12
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
SANDPIPERS STROLL THE STRAND (MARCH 24);
HOPE CHAPEL’S EASTER EGG HUNT (APRIL 20); AND
HOPE CHAPEL’S EASTER SUNRISE SERVICE (APRIL 21)
(Community Resources Manager Kelly Orta)
Attachments:1. Hearts of Hermosa Special Event Application
2. Hearts of Hermosa Fee Waiver Application
3. Stroll the Strand Special Event Application
4. Stroll the Strand Application Fee Waiver Application
5. Hope Chapel Easter Egg Hunt Special Event Applicaiton
6. Hope Chapel Easter Egg Hunt Fee Waiver Application
7. Hope Chapel Easter Sunrise Service Special Event Application
8. Hope Chapel's Easter Sunrise Service Fee Waiver Application
Public comment:
Debra Luckey, Hermosa Beach Education Foundation Executive Committee
Tasha Gates, Vice President of Sponsorship, Sandpipers
Alan Kisaka, Pastor, Hope Chapel
Motion Fangary and seconded by Duclos to approve 50% fee waivers for the
following organizations:
1. Hermosa Beach Education Foundation for 'Hearts of Hermosa Beach' on
Saturday, March 23 (requesting fee waiver of $7,814.29-50% of that amount
granted);
2. Sandpipers for 'Sandpipers Stroll the Strand' on Sunday, March 24 (requesting
fee waiver of $400-50% of that amount granted);
3. Hope Chapel's Easter Egg Hunt on Saturday, April 20 (requesting fee waiver of
$2,612-50% of that amount granted); and
4. Hope Chapel's Easter Sunrise Service on Sunday, April 21 (requesting fee
waiver of $11,304-50% of that amount granted).
Aye:3 - Fangary, Massey, and Duclos
No:2 - Mayor Armato, and Campbell
Absent:0
d)REPORT ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT RIDESHARE ZONES
19-0117 IN DOWNTOWN HERMOSA BEACH
(Environmental Analyst Leeanne Singleton &
Acting Chief of Police Milton McKinnon)
Attachments:1. Staff Report May 2017 Request to Renew Exclusive Taxicab
Franchise Agreements
2. Pilot Phase 1 - Downtown Rideshare Locations.jpg
3. Downtown Rideshare Proposed Permanent Rideshare Zones-02.jpg
City Council Meeting Minutes March 12, 2019
Page 11 of 12
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
4. Permanent Rideshare Zone Signage.pdf
Motion Duclos and seconded by Campbell to approve the implementation of a
permanent rideshare zone program in Downtown Hermosa Beach to improve
safety and better facilitate pick-up and drop-off of passengers from rideshare
services, private vehicles, and taxicab operations.
Aye:5 - Mayor Armato, Campbell, Fangary, Massey, and Duclos
Absent:0
e)REPORT APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH GRANICUS, INC. TO
19-0158 CONTINUE PROVIDING MEETING AND AGENDA MANAGEMENT,
VIDEO STREAMING, AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION SERVICES;
AND TO PROVIDE A NEW CLOSED CAPTIONING SERVICE FOR
CITY MEETINGS FROM MARCH 12, 2019 - JUNE 30, 2022
(Assistant to the City Manager Nico De Anda-Scaia)
Attachments:1. Link to example of meeting captions
2. Granicus Proposal 2019-2022.pdf
This item was continued.
7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS - CITY
COUNCIL
a)19-0149 UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES
AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES
None
8. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
a)19-0160 COUNCILMEMBERS DUCLOS AND MASSEY REQUEST THAT
STAFF EXPAND THE SCOPE OF THE OTHER MATTERS AGENDA
ITEM ON PLASTIC SERVICE WARE SUPPORTED BY CTIY
COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 27, 2018 TO INCLUDE CONSIDERATION
OF DIRECTION TO THE DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT
SUBCOMMITTEE (WHICH, ON APRIL 10, 2018, THE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZED TO COLLABORATE WITH STAKEHOLDERS TO
INCREASE ECONOMIC VITALITY DOWNTOWN), OR OTHER
SUBCOMMITTEE, TO DEVELOP THE FOLLOWING FOR CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL: (1) AN ORDINANCE TO REDUCE AND
ELIMINATE THE SALE AND USE OF SINGLE USE PLASTICS IN
City Council Meeting Minutes March 12, 2019
Page 12 of 12
City of Hermosa Beach Approved on 3/26/2019
HERMOSA BEACH; AND (2) LETTERS OF SUPPORT FOR
LEGISLATIVE AND CONGRESSIONAL EFFORTS TO ACHIEVE THE
SAME OBJECTIVE ACROSS CALIFORNIA AND NATIONWIDE.
Councilmembers Massey and Duclos spoke to their request, garnering support from Armato and
Campbell.
b)19-0157 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Attachments:Tentative Future Agenda.pdf
It was Council consensus to receive and file the Tentative Future Agenda Items.
ADJOURNMENT
11:36 p.m., in memory of Roger Bacon, to an adjourned Regular meeting (a joint meeting with
the Hermosa Beach School District) on Monday, March 18, 2019 at 7 p.m. in Council Chambers,
which will adjourn to the Regular meeting of Tuesday, March 26, 2019.
Elaine Doerfling Linda Abbott
City Clerk Deputy City Clerk
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0168
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
CHECK REGISTERS
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the following check registers.
Attachments:
1.Check Register 2/26/19
2.Check Register 2/28/19
3.Check Register 3/7/19
Approved: Viki Copeland, Finance Director
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
02/26/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1
8:57:38AM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91232 2/26/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CO OP 3324 (PO 14432)TAXI VOUCHER PROGRAM/DEC1811437
145-3404-4201 4,509.55
Total : 4,509.5511437
91233 2/26/2019 AMERICAN GUARD SERVICES, INC. 197385 (PO 14206) CROSSING GUARD SERVICES/NOV1820685
001-2102-4201 10,336.32
CROSSING GUARD SERVICES/DEC18199789 (PO 14206)
001-2102-4201 9,560.80
Total : 19,897.1220685
91234 2/26/2019 ANIMAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL CENTE 620230 MAT REQ 873448/EUTHANIZED OPOSSUM/JAN1912685
001-3302-4201 60.00
Total : 60.0012685
91235 2/26/2019 ASCENT ELEVATOR SERVICES, INC 14855 (PO 14268) ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE/FEB1918891
001-4204-4201 288.00
Total : 288.0018891
91236 2/26/2019 AT&T 310 796-6526 991 3 PD COMPUTER CIRCUITS/FEB1900321
001-2101-4304 122.33
Total : 122.3300321
91237 2/26/2019 AT&T MOBILITY 287016141723X0214201 PW ADMIN/FANGARY/CELL PHONES/JAN1913361
001-4202-4304 198.92
001-1101-4304 23.72
Total : 222.6413361
91238 2/26/2019 ATHENS SERVICES 6080623-A (PO 14490) CITYWIDE STEAM CLEANING/DEC1816660
001-3301-4201 6,089.95
001-3304-4201 213.85
Total : 6,303.8016660
91239 2/26/2019 ATHENS SERVICES 6269879 (PO 14581) PD SHREDDING/FEB1916660
001-2101-4309 44.44
Total : 44.4416660
91240 2/26/2019 BEACH GIRL PROPERTIES LLC 239 PARKING METERS - 70 14TH STREET/FEB1916371
001-3842 650.00
2b (1)
02/26/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
2
8:57:38AM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 650.00 91240 2/26/2019 BEACH GIRL PROPERTIES LLC16371
91241 2/26/2019 CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC 4028338069 COPIER MAINTENANCE/USAGE 10/10/18-1/9/1910838
715-1208-4201 1,482.14
715-2101-4201 44.07
715-1201-4201 559.77
Total : 2,085.9810838
91242 2/26/2019 CASSELL, SHIRLEY Parcel 4187-022-026 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE06914
001-6871 73.01
105-3105 24.61
Total : 97.6206914
91243 2/26/2019 CERTAPRO PAINTERS OF PV 1848 PAINT BARD STREET FENCE BEIGE18185
301-8673-4201 5,995.00
Total : 5,995.0018185
91244 2/26/2019 CITY CLERKS ASSOCIATION OF CA 255 DOERFLING/MEMBERSHIP THRU 1/1/2000356
001-1121-4315 130.00
ABBOTT/ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 2019355
001-1121-4315 55.00
Total : 185.0000356
91245 2/26/2019 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES C0008837/PO 14098 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES/MAR1920781
001-2202-4251 395,244.77
180-2202-4251 3,306.56
001-2202-5601 37,882.50
001-2202-4111 10,629.60
Total : 447,063.4320781
91246 2/26/2019 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 352846 FINGERPRINTING/JAN1900364
001-1203-4251 128.00
Total : 128.0000364
91247 2/26/2019 DEWEY PEST CONTROL Account 759408 PO 14430/PEST CONTROL/FEB1911449
001-4204-4201 694.00
Total : 694.0011449
91248 2/26/2019 DEWEY PEST CONTROL Account 1233239 SEWER RAT ABATEMENT/FEB1911449
160-3102-4201 262.00
02/26/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
3
8:57:38AM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 262.00 91248 2/26/2019 DEWEY PEST CONTROL11449
91249 2/26/2019 DFM ASSOCIATES PO 32937 2019 ELECTIONS CODE KIT00726
001-1121-4251 67.00
001-1121-4251 6.37
Total : 73.3700726
91250 2/26/2019 DUDEK 20189044/PO 12424 CITY YARD REMEDIATION/DEC1820611
001-8615-4201 225.00
Total : 225.0020611
91251 2/26/2019 EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING AND EQUIP 11483 (PO 14845)CLEAN & VIDEO INSPECT SEWERS/DEC1807853
160-3102-4201 24,270.90
CLEAN & VIDEO INSPECT SEWERS/JAN1911518 (PO 14845)
160-3102-4201 27,004.89
Total : 51,275.7907853
91252 2/26/2019 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET 57041845 VEHICLE FUEL PURCHASES 11/11/18-12/10/1810668
001-1250 78.71
715-2101-4310 5,934.01
715-3104-4310 312.03
715-3302-4310 1,262.58
715-4204-4310 114.12
715-4206-4310 331.62
715-6101-4310 231.36
Total : 8,264.4310668
91253 2/26/2019 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 6-461-90946 MAT REQ 773759/OVERNIGHT TO MGT (VENDOR)01962
001-1202-4305 41.96
Total : 41.9601962
91254 2/26/2019 FJR PACIFIC, INC.20954 COUNCIL CHAMBERS HEATER REPAIRS21217
715-4204-4201 477.00
Total : 477.0021217
91255 2/26/2019 FLUD, JACOB Inv0001HER BARD STREET FENCE INSTALLATION/MATERIALS21214
301-8673-4201 48,482.00
Total : 48,482.0021214
91256 2/26/2019 FRONTIER 209-188-4669-0714985 LANDLINES/COMPUTER LINKS/FEB1919884
02/26/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4
8:57:38AM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91256 2/26/2019 (Continued)FRONTIER19884
001-3302-4304 67.91
001-2101-4304 794.76
001-4204-4321 205.02
001-4202-4304 52.12
001-4201-4304 150.58
001-3304-4304 57.14
001-1204-4304 49.47
PD COMPUTER CIRCUITS/FEB19209-190-0013-1206175
001-2101-4304 879.33
DUI BREATH MACHINE/FEB19310-318-9210-0827185
001-2101-4304 62.92
CHAMBERS EOC ANALOG LINES/FEB19310-318-9800-1204155
715-1206-4304 1,410.62
PERSONNEL FAX LINE/FEB19310-372-6373-0311045
001-1203-4304 49.41
FIBER OPTIC LINE/MAR19323-155-6779-0822065
715-1206-4201 213.98
Total : 3,993.2619884
91257 2/26/2019 GRAINGER 9080143275 MAT REQ 686505/PRESSURE HOSE/DIE GRINDER10836
715-4201-4311 200.51
Total : 200.5110836
91258 2/26/2019 HAJOCA CORP S154930405.001 MAT REQ 773967/PLUMBING SUPPLIES/JAN1913330
001-4204-4309 184.99
Total : 184.9913330
91259 2/26/2019 HDL COREN AND CONE 0026171-IN/PO 14491 PROPERTY TAX AUDIT SERVICES/JAN19-MAR1903131
001-1202-4201 1,375.00
Total : 1,375.0003131
91260 2/26/2019 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1015491 MAT REQ 863197/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES03432
001-4204-4309 224.31
MAT REQ 873352/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES1066382
001-4204-4309 232.01
MAT REQ 773512/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES1073616
001-4204-4309 111.67
REQ 863330/PARK PROG/BROOMS/WIPES1074659
02/26/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
5
8:57:38AM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91260 2/26/2019 (Continued)HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES03432
001-4601-4308 43.96
MAT REQ 863367/5,000 1/2" STAPLES1074660
001-4601-4308 31.49
MAT REQ 773495/5 TEAK BOARDS2112966
001-4204-4309 110.08
MAT REQ 532333/POTTING SOIL MIX/MULCH3204441
001-6101-4309 80.42
MAT REQ 863199/FLEX FIX/2 FLOOD LIGHTS4022737
001-4204-4309 144.03
MAT REQ 532438/SUCCULENTS/PLANTS5114559
001-6101-4309 298.40
MAT REQ 863446/CABLE TIES/TYPE 80 BELTS5239450 & 5240131
001-4601-4305 52.28
MAT REQ 669840/32 BAGS OF CEMENT6015053
001-3104-4309 311.52
MAT REQ 532436/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES6052571
001-6101-4309 46.98
MAT REQ 532435/SUCCULENTS/PLANTS6114408
001-6101-4309 331.59
MAT REQ 863192/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES7021472
001-4204-4309 383.42
MAT REQ 649528/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES7023387
001-4204-4309 175.74
MAT REQ 863198/RATCHET TIE-DOWN9022203
001-4204-4309 17.60
Total : 2,595.5003432
91261 2/26/2019 INTERNATIONAL INST OF PO 32909 DOERFLING/ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 201900668
001-1121-4315 210.00
Total : 210.0000668
91262 2/26/2019 IPS GROUP INC 39705 (PO 14489)PARKING METER WIRELESS/CC FEES/JAN1919314
001-3305-4201 831.34
001-3304-4201 953.39
001-3302-4201 9,429.39
Total : 11,214.1219314
91263 2/26/2019 JOBS AVAILABLE 1904014 PO 14209/ASSOC ENGINEER JOB AD/FEB1901165
02/26/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
6
8:57:38AM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91263 2/26/2019 (Continued)JOBS AVAILABLE01165
001-1203-4201 546.00
Total : 546.0001165
91264 2/26/2019 KLINE, RONALD W 202421 COMM CTR HEATER TROUBLESHOOT LABOR21243
001-4204-4201 175.00
Total : 175.0021243
91265 2/26/2019 LA CO SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT 192168BL MAT REQ 863273/PRISONER MEALS/DEC1800151
001-2101-4306 190.85
Total : 190.8500151
91266 2/26/2019 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES, INC.INV-069076 10 RED CABLES FOR PLAY STRUCTURES @ PARK12190
001-6101-4309 305.50
001-6101-4309 26.36
Total : 331.8612190
91267 2/26/2019 MARTIN & CHAPMAN 2019008 2019 ELECTION MANUAL/RESOS/FORMS/NOTICES09362
001-1121-4251 243.05
Total : 243.0509362
91268 2/26/2019 MCCORMICK AMBULANCE 226944 (PO 14429)AMBULANCE TRANSPORT SERVICES/DEC18-JAN1920898
001-1201-4201 30,350.00
Total : 30,350.0020898
91269 2/26/2019 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SERVICES 53478 (PO 14377)CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING SERVICES/JAN1918071
001-6101-4201 19,200.00
CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING SERVICES/JAN1953479 (PO 14377)
105-2601-4201 3,700.00
Total : 22,900.0018071
91270 2/26/2019 MEYER, MEAGHAN K PO 32981 VOIDED CITATIONS 43005537 & 43005538 REF21242
001-3302 76.00
Total : 76.0021242
91271 2/26/2019 MONROE SYSTEMS IN68439 REPLACEMENT CALCULATOR - PAYROLL14344
001-1202-4305 186.30
001-1202-4305 17.70
Total : 204.0014344
02/26/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
7
8:57:38AM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91272 2/26/2019 NACHTRIEB, HAROLD PO 32994 CASH KEY NO. 214165 REFUND21246
001-2117 21.00
001-3851 25.00
Total : 46.0021246
91273 2/26/2019 NORTH STAR GRAPHICS 1725 (PO 13409)VEHICLE 44 GRAPHICS KIT AND INSTALLATION09182
715-3302-4311 489.50
Total : 489.5009182
91274 2/26/2019 NOWDOCS INTERNATIONAL, INC 63949 MAT REQ 773760/GREEN A/P CHECK STOCK06473
001-1202-4305 183.96
Total : 183.9606473
91275 2/26/2019 OLEARY, JOHN PAUL PO 32983 CITATION 44004234 REFUND (VOIDED)21236
001-3302 38.00
Total : 38.0021236
91276 2/26/2019 PARS 42241 PARS ARS FEES/DEC1814693
001-1101-4185 15.08
001-1204-4185 1.42
001-3302-4185 6.99
001-4204-4185 13.09
001-4101-4185 14.61
001-4201-4185 14.61
001-4601-4185 234.20
Total : 300.0014693
91277 2/26/2019 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT 366765 (PO 14895)16 SAFARILAND FIREARM HOLSTERS13614
001-2101-4201 1,669.48
Total : 1,669.4813614
91278 2/26/2019 PROVIDENCE LITTLE CO OF PO 32969 MEDICAL EXAM/OK TO BOOK FEES 1/6/1908445
001-2101-4201 614.57
Total : 614.5708445
91279 2/26/2019 RED SECURITY GROUP, LLC 55481 MAT REQ 773969/LOCKSMITH SRVCS/REKEY13255
001-4204-4309 13.14
MAT REQ 673802/EOC FILE CABINET KEYS55486
001-4204-4309 119.36
02/26/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
8
8:57:38AM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 132.50 91279 2/26/2019 RED SECURITY GROUP, LLC13255
91280 2/26/2019 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF 567166 (PO 14493)CITY PROSECUTOR SERVICES/JAN1903282
001-1132-4201 16,667.00
Total : 16,667.0003282
91281 2/26/2019 RJ PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL 124 EXCEPTION TO ASSIGNED SHIFT SLIPS21153
001-2101-4305 543.18
001-2101-4305 51.60
001-2101-4305 30.85
Total : 625.6321153
91282 2/26/2019 RYDER, LISA R PO 13910 GREEN BUSINESS PROG IMPLEMENT/OCT-DEC1816970
001-1201-4201 5,800.00
Total : 5,800.0016970
91283 2/26/2019 SCMAF 7494 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP (9 STAFF)12112
001-4601-4315 310.00
Total : 310.0012112
91284 2/26/2019 SKEATH, CARTER J PO 32985 CITATION NO. 36004027 REFUND (VOIDED)21240
001-3302 48.00
Total : 48.0021240
91285 2/26/2019 SOCAL GAS Account 01100457678 PW YARD CNG STATION/GAS 1/25/19-2/7/1900170
001-4204-4303 36.79
PW YARD CNG STATION/GAS 1/25-2/7/19Account 17078132879
001-4204-4303 167.37
Total : 204.1600170
91286 2/26/2019 SOUTH BAY FIRE, INC.160351 RECHARGE 2 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AT PD00113
001-2101-4201 36.00
Total : 36.0000113
91287 2/26/2019 SOUTH BAY FORD 601940 & 602104 VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINT PARTS 1/22-1/23/1910532
715-3302-4311 131.06
Total : 131.0610532
91288 2/26/2019 SPCALA 2019-0131 PO 14433/ANIMAL SERVICES/JAN1918821
001-3302-4201 400.00
02/26/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
9
8:57:38AM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 400.00 91288 2/26/2019 SPCALA18821
91289 2/26/2019 SPECTRUM BUSINESS 0046247021219 CITY HALL/CABLE/MAR1920236
715-4204-4201 83.98
1301 HERMOSA/RCC CONNECTION/MAR190350359021119
001-2101-4304 139.99
PD COMPUTER CIRCUITS/MAR190352413021219
001-2101-4304 261.58
Total : 485.5520236
91290 2/26/2019 SPRINT 269424317-206 PD TRUNK MODEM 11/JAN1910098
153-2106-4201 35.00
Total : 35.0010098
91291 2/26/2019 TIREHUB LLC 6345602 MAT REQ 773438/GOODYEAR TIRES (4)21146
715-2101-4311 605.49
MAT REQ 773439/TIRES/VEHICLE 606347001
715-3104-4311 503.74
Total : 1,109.2321146
91292 2/26/2019 TOFTELAND, JOSH PO 32987 CITATION 40002772 REFUND (VOIDED)21237
001-3302 48.00
Total : 48.0021237
91293 2/26/2019 TUMBLEWEED TRANSPORTATION 0012198-IN/PO 14879 AFTERSCHOOL TRANSPORTATION/JAN1920749
145-3411-4201 3,150.00
Total : 3,150.0020749
91294 2/26/2019 TURBODATA SYSTEMS, INC.29541 (PO 14431)TICKET WRITER WIRELESS FEES 1/25-2/24/1920670
001-3302-4201 1,250.00
Total : 1,250.0020670
91295 2/26/2019 UPS 000023R146079 MAT REQ 773280/BWC GRANT TO DOJ14148
001-2101-4305 54.38
001-3302-4309 16.65
Total : 71.0314148
91296 2/26/2019 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE 31307 PRINTER MAINTENANCE/MAR1904768
715-1206-4201 943.00
02/26/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
10
8:57:38AM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 943.00 91296 2/26/2019 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE04768
91297 2/26/2019 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 71022408 VOIP PHONES/YARD/DEC1818666
001-4202-4304 143.87
Total : 143.8718666
91298 2/26/2019 VERIZON WIRELESS LA 9823982705 COMM DEV/CELL PHONES/JAN1903209
001-4201-4304 155.42
EMERGENCY MANAGER/CELL PHONE/JAN199824028803
001-1201-4304 53.84
Total : 209.2603209
91299 2/26/2019 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS LLC 21534 RI LICENSE PLATE READER SOFTWARE 1 YR SUBSC20892
001-2101-4201 6,995.00
Total : 6,995.0020892
91300 2/26/2019 WESTCHESTER MEDICAL GROUP CH026-8454 ANNUAL PHYSICAL FOR NICO DE ANDA-SCAIA11219
001-1203-4320 500.00
Total : 500.0011219
3376804 2/21/2019 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 2/21/19 Check Run UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMS/OCT18-DEC1801397
705-1215-4186 3,290.00
Total : 3,290.0001397
192320202 2/14/2019 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 2/21/19 Check Run LIABILITY CLAIMS REIMB/JAN1914691
705-1209-4324 3,172.00
Total : 3,172.0014691
230211087 1/24/2019 SOCAL GAS 2/21/19 Check Run GAS BILLS/DEC1800170
001-4204-4303 355.30
Total : 355.3000170
500319826 2/20/2019 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET 57432811 VEHICLE FUEL PURCHASES 12/11/18-1/10/1910668
001-1250 73.36
715-2101-4310 5,544.48
715-2601-4310 123.58
715-3104-4310 548.69
715-3302-4310 1,171.64
715-4204-4310 106.43
715-4206-4310 205.72
02/26/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
11
8:57:38AM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
500319826 2/20/2019 (Continued)EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET10668
715-6101-4310 184.50
Total : 7,958.4010668
680000561 1/30/2019 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 2/21/19 Check Run WORK COMP CLAIMS REIMB/JAN1914691
705-1217-4324 59,010.96
Total : 59,010.9614691
1923040045 2/14/2019 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 2/21/19 Check Run WORK COMP CLAIMS REIMB/FEB1914691
705-1217-4324 7,935.85
Total : 7,935.8514691
Bank total : 796,596.91 75 Vouchers for bank code :boa
796,596.91Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 75
"I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the
checks listed on pages 1 to 11 inclusive, of the check
register for 2/26/19 are accurate funds are available for
payment, and are in conformance to the budget."
By
Finance Director
Date 3/11/19
02/28/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1
3:58:17PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91301 2/28/2019 AMERICAN GUARD SERVICES, INC. 200908 (PO 14206) CROSSING GUARD SERVICES/JAN1920685
001-2102-4201 14,065.92
Total : 14,065.9220685
91302 2/28/2019 ASCENT ELEVATOR SERVICES, INC 14994 ANNUAL SAFETY TEST FOR CITY HALL ELEVATO18891
001-4204-4201 1,150.00
Total : 1,150.0018891
91303 2/28/2019 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 6233 MAT REQ 973743/2 NAMEPLATES W/HOLDERS00262
001-1121-4305 73.37
Total : 73.3700262
91304 2/28/2019 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 6-469-40070 REQ 768257/SHIP TO DONNOE (VENDOR)01962
001-1203-4305 34.73
Total : 34.7301962
91305 2/28/2019 FOSTER GORDON MANUFACTURING CO 32372 50 PRESENTATION FOLDERS & PROTECTIVE SHE07910
001-1101-4305 631.19
Total : 631.1907910
91306 2/28/2019 FRONTIER 310-372-6186-0831895 2ND FLOOR CITY HALL FAX 2/16/19-3/15/1919884
001-1121-4304 10.42
001-1141-4304 10.42
001-1201-4304 10.42
001-1202-4304 10.42
001-1203-4304 10.41
Total : 52.0919884
91307 2/28/2019 GOLDEN TOUCH CLEANING, INC.65922 (PO 14468) JANITORIAL/CITY-OWNED BLDGS/JAN1920627
001-4204-4201 9,111.00
Total : 9,111.0020627
91308 2/28/2019 IPS GROUP INC 40120 METER MAINTENANCE PARTS19314
001-3302-4309 935.00
001-3302-4309 103.83
Total : 1,038.8319314
91309 2/28/2019 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1473031 LEGAL SERVICES/PERSONNEL/JAN1902175
001-1203-4201 214.00
2b (2)
02/28/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
2
3:58:17PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91309 2/28/2019 (Continued)LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE02175
LEGAL SERVICES/PERSONNEL/JAN191473032
001-1203-4201 1,475.65
Total : 1,689.6502175
91310 2/28/2019 MANIACI INSURANCE SERVICES 916 (PO 14354)BENEFITS CONNECT ADMINISTRATION/JAN1918312
001-1203-4201 578.34
Total : 578.3418312
91311 2/28/2019 MGT OF AMERICA, INC 34868 (PO 14239)ANNUAL SB90 CLAIMING18209
001-1202-4201 2,125.00
Total : 2,125.0018209
91312 2/28/2019 NATW 9532 PD MEMBERSHIP14286
001-3302-4315 35.00
Total : 35.0014286
91313 2/28/2019 PHILLIPS, JOHN A.E473D9 BLOODBORNE PATHOGENS/HAZMAT TRAINING21203
001-2101-4317 1,216.00
Total : 1,216.0021203
91314 2/28/2019 PLATA, YUNUEN PO 33001 MILEAGE/CCUG SOUTHERN TRAINING18411
001-2101-4317 47.56
Total : 47.5618411
91315 2/28/2019 PROSUM TECHNOLOGY SERVICES SIN019156/PO 13752 SERVER MIGRATION/PHASE 2 1/7/19-1/13/1911539
715-1206-4201 1,000.00
Total : 1,000.0011539
91316 2/28/2019 ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, THE CITY OF 3971 FANGARY/CONTRACT CITIES DINNER21230
001-1101-4317 106.30
Total : 106.3021230
91317 2/28/2019 SBCU VISA 00005 CC MEMBERSHIP THRU 2/1/2003353
001-2101-4315 100.00
WATER DELIVERY 12/13/18-1/12/1909A0034513168 CC
001-2101-4305 60.30
PHILLIPS/PARTNERING FOR TEAM SUCCESS12088/TR 772 CC
001-2101-4317 99.00
FANGARY/SACRAMENTO LEGISLATIVE TOUR2528/TR 771 CC
02/28/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
3
3:58:17PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91317 2/28/2019 (Continued)SBCU VISA03353
001-1101-4317 550.00
MANAGEMENT RETREAT HOTEL/CATERING/BAL DU307450 CC
001-1203-4317 2,515.24
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER JOB AD3340194 CC
001-1203-4201 495.00
250 COPIES/EOC MESSAGING FORM 21360953 CC
001-1201-4317 145.00
001-1201-4317 13.78
SENIOR CENTER MUSIC/FEB19Email Reciept CC
001-4601-4328 9.99
PO 14338/CONFERENCE LINE/DEC18IC30411-1218 CC
001-1201-4304 29.55
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER JOB ADJob Ad CC
001-1203-4201 74.25
TACTICAL RESPONSE JACKETS FOR DETECTIVESMat Req 773265 CC
001-2101-4314 335.08
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER JOB ADOrder 00192573 CC
001-1203-4201 250.00
CLEAN BAY INSPECTION FORMSOrder 5291379 CC
161-3109-4201 70.26
161-3109-4201 6.67
CHAMBER INSTALLATION GALA TICKETSOrder 879826240 CC
001-1101-4319 568.40
COFFEE SUPPLIES FOR 2ND FLOOR CONFERENCEOrder Ending 1066 CC
001-1101-4305 166.64
EXERCISE EQUIPMENT FOR SENIOR CENTEROrder Ending 5448 CC
001-4601-4328 78.92
GLASS WATER BOTTLES FOR COMMISSION MEETIOrder Ending 7821 CC
001-4601-4305 24.33
SUNSHINE PILLOW FOR COMMUNITY PROGRAMOrder Ending 9418 CC
001-4601-4308 56.97
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER JOB ADOrder No. 19149 CC
001-1203-4201 325.00
TRAINING FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTOrder No. 9543 CC
001-1203-4317 540.00
MAGNETIC WHITE BOARD FOR SALLYPORT OFFICPO 32803 CC
001-2101-4305 194.50
WATER FILTER FOR JAIL REFRIGERATORPO 32807 CC
02/28/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4
3:58:17PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91317 2/28/2019 (Continued)SBCU VISA03353
001-2101-4306 43.95
FOOD FOR NYE DEPLOYMENTPO 32810 CC
001-2101-4305 250.00
NYE DEPLOYMENT/PLATES/UTENSILS/DRINKSPO 32812 CC
001-2101-4305 45.56
MEMBERSHIP & TRAININGPO 32854 CC
001-2101-4315 75.00
001-2101-4317 55.00
ESZLINGER/MENTAL HEALTH DECISION MAKINGPO 32858 CC
001-2101-4317 150.02
CHAMBER GALA TICKET FOR COUNCILMEMBER CAPO 32861 CC
001-1101-4319 81.20
BUSINESS CARDS FOR POLICE OFFICER J. SMIPO 32863 CC
001-2101-4305 38.86
HIGH VISIBILITY JACKET FOR CSO MALUPO 32867 CC
001-3302-4314 56.57
001-3302-4314 5.37
BUSINESS CARDS FOR OFFICER G. MCDERMOTTPO 32877 CC
001-2101-4305 38.86
COMMUNITY THEATRE PROGRAMMING NEEDSPO 32887 CC
001-4601-4308 133.21
POLICE ACADEMY SUPPLIES/RECRUIT JOHNSONPO 32961 CC
001-2101-4314 144.82
KHANG/GRAMMAR & PROOFREADING SEMINARPO 32984 CC
001-4101-4317 99.00
COFFEE FOR COMMAND POSTPO 33002 CC
001-2101-4305 33.90
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER JOB ADReceipt 0001NU CC
001-1203-4201 175.00
SHIP CITY TILE PLAQUE TO ASSEMBLYMEMBERReceipt 21306 CC
001-1101-4305 10.00
COMMUNITY POLICE ADVISORY BOARD DINNERReceipt CC
001-3302-4201 94.07
COUNCIL DINNERReceipt CC
001-1101-4305 146.06
COUNCIL DINNERReceipt CC
001-1101-4305 136.55
COUNCIL DINNERReceipt CC
02/28/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
5
3:58:17PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91317 2/28/2019 (Continued)SBCU VISA03353
001-1101-4305 194.73
ROOM RENTAL FOR COM DEV STAFF TRAININGReceipts CC
001-1203-4317 510.00
VINT/NICHOLS/SPECIAL EVENT SAFETY/REFUNDTR 719 & 720 CC
001-4601-4317 -4.31
ROBERTSON/CONFERENCE REGISTRATIONTR 771 CC
001-4101-4317 400.00
PHILLIPS/PARTNERING FOR TEAM SUCCESSTR 772 CC
001-2101-4317 132.96
PHILLIPS/PARTNERING FOR TEAM SUCCESSTR 772 CC
001-2101-4317 53.18
PHILLIPS/ICI MGMT/SUPERVISE DETECTIVESTR 777 CC
001-2101-4317 576.00
CITY-RELATED EVENT ADS 12/12/18-1/10/19Trans ID 5216 CC
001-1201-4201 75.47
SENIOR CENTER MOVIE RENTALTransID4405830885 CC
001-4601-4328 1.75
001-4601-4328 0.17
Total : 10,461.8303353
91318 2/28/2019 SBCU VISA 300000077 CC ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 201903353
001-1201-4315 75.00
Total : 75.0003353
91319 2/28/2019 SHOETERIA 0137147-IN MAT REQ 572009/BEEDY/BOOTS20539
001-4202-4314 124.90
Total : 124.9020539
91320 2/28/2019 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 88652415 to 88931174 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES/JAN1919829
001-6101-4309 1,834.27
Total : 1,834.2719829
91321 2/28/2019 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 2-29-332-0750 ELECTRICITY/FEB1900159
105-2601-4303 119.45
Total : 119.4500159
91322 2/28/2019 SPARKLETTS 4472788 013119 COMM RES/DRINKING WATER/JAN1900146
001-4601-4305 228.00
02/28/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
6
3:58:17PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 228.00 91322 2/28/2019 SPARKLETTS00146
91323 2/28/2019 SPRINT 551834312-206 COMM RES/CELL PHONES/JAN1910098
001-4601-4304 161.90
Total : 161.9010098
91324 2/28/2019 TRIANGLE HARDWARE February Statement MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/FEB1900123
001-3104-4309 733.07
001-4204-4309 3,239.32
001-6101-4309 709.59
105-2601-4309 1,427.74
715-4206-4309 146.05
001-2021 191.93
001-2022 -191.93
Total : 6,255.7700123
91325 2/28/2019 VERIZON WIRELESS LA 9824313389 IN-FIELD FINGERPRINTING 1/17/19-2/16/1903209
153-2106-4201 134.64
PD TRUNK MODEMS/FEB199824313390
001-2101-4304 418.11
Total : 552.7503209
192003061 2/25/2019 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 2/28/19 Check Run WORK COMP CLAIMS REIMB/FEB1914691
705-1217-4324 5,328.19
Total : 5,328.1914691
510189677 2/21/2019 SOCAL GAS 2/28/19 Check Run GAS BILL/JAN1900170
001-4204-4303 121.02
Total : 121.0200170
520171842 2/22/2019 PITNEY BOWES INC 2/28/19 Check Run POSTAGE METER REFILL/FEB1913838
001-1208-4305 1,000.00
Total : 1,000.0013838
Bank total : 59,218.06 28 Vouchers for bank code :boa
59,218.06Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 28
02/28/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
7
3:58:17PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
"I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the
checks listed on pages 1 to 7 inclusive, of the check
register for 2/28/19 are accurate funds are available for
payment, and are in conformance to the budget."
By
Finance Director
Date 3/11/19
03/07/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1
5:44:25PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91326 3/7/2019 ACTIVE NETWORK LLC 11106185 SKATE PARK MEMBERSHIP CARDS EQUIPMENT06349
001-4601-4201 1,673.10
001-4601-4201 146.39
Total : 1,819.4906349
91327 3/7/2019 ADMINSURE, INC.11772 (PO 14125) GENERAL/AUTO LIABIL CLAIM ADMIN/MAR1904715
001-1203-4201 1,300.00
Total : 1,300.0004715
91328 3/7/2019 AT&T 000012622356 PD COMPUTER CIRCUITS 1/13/19-2/12/1900321
001-2101-4304 137.89
Total : 137.8900321
91329 3/7/2019 BARROWS, PATRICK PO 33045 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/CLASSES 7885/7918-917271
001-4601-4221 1,935.50
Total : 1,935.5017271
91330 3/7/2019 BLACK, CATHERINE M Parcel 4186-022-010 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE19248
001-6871 121.69
105-3105 24.61
Total : 146.3019248
91331 3/7/2019 CALIFORNIA FENCE AND SUPPLY CO 7121 EDITH RODAWAY PARK FENCE REPAIR03621
125-8546-4201 650.00
Total : 650.0003621
91332 3/7/2019 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 6235/Mat Req 863283 VINYL LETTERS FOR BRIEFING WHITEBOARD00262
001-2101-4305 99.65
Total : 99.6500262
91333 3/7/2019 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE Account 4286211111 WATER USAGE/JAN1900016
105-2601-4303 3,316.23
001-6101-4303 10,418.18
001-4204-4303 1,198.42
001-3304-4303 313.91
105-2601-4303 13.26
Total : 15,260.0000016
91334 3/7/2019 CDWG QXF4198 MAT REQ 773276/PRINTER TONER FOR JAIL09632 2b (3)
03/07/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
2
5:44:25PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91334 3/7/2019 (Continued)CDWG09632
001-2101-4306 558.65
ADOBE SOFTWARE ANNUAL SUBSCRIP RENEWRCN9459
715-1206-4201 1,329.00
FUJITSU SCANNER FOR A/PRGG1982
001-1202-5401 879.00
001-1202-5401 83.51
MAT REQ 773281/PRINTER TONERRGJ4109
001-2101-4305 529.85
MAT REQ 773281/PRINTER TONERRHF6387
001-2101-4305 447.50
Total : 3,827.5109632
91335 3/7/2019 COHEN, MARGARET A.Parcel 4184-007-028 STREET LIGHT TAX REBATE20479
105-3105 24.61
Total : 24.6120479
91336 3/7/2019 CONTINENTAL MAPPING SERVICE 020719 (PO 14208)300' PUBLIC NOTICE/825 15TH ST/FEB1920398
001-4101-4201 550.00
Total : 550.0020398
91337 3/7/2019 CORREIA, LEXIA Receipt 1003116.002 GYM SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND21261
001-2111 111.00
Total : 111.0021261
91338 3/7/2019 COSTALES, THOMAS M Parcel 4186-027-004 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE16526
001-6871 121.69
105-3105 24.61
Total : 146.3016526
91339 3/7/2019 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES RE-PW-19021103931 PO 14628/ARTESIA BLVD MEDIAN MAINT/JAN1900879
001-3104-4251 863.43
Total : 863.4300879
91340 3/7/2019 CSULB FOUNDATION PO 32776 GAGLIA/TRAINING MANAGER'S WORKSHOP00349
001-2101-4312 199.00
Total : 199.0000349
91341 3/7/2019 DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP, INC.79449 (PO 14546)TREE INVENTORY SERVICES/JAN1921085
301-4202-4201 8,745.00
03/07/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
3
5:44:25PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 8,745.00 91341 3/7/2019 DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP, INC.21085
91342 3/7/2019 DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, STATE OF CAOSIP 65596 WORKER'S COMP INS ASSESS 18/1914909
705-1217-4201 59,820.09
Total : 59,820.0914909
91343 3/7/2019 DIV OF THE STATE ARCHITECT PO 32976 BUSINESS LIC STATE CASP FEES/JUL18-SEP1818263
001-6851 272.70
BUSINESS LIC STATE CASP FEES/OCT18-DEC18PO 32977
001-6851 217.90
Total : 490.6018263
91344 3/7/2019 DROZ, JOSHUA TR 778 PER DIEM/POST SUPERVISORY COURSE14210
001-2101-4312 500.00
Total : 500.0014210
91345 3/7/2019 DUNCAN SOLUTIONS, INC.DS0000002011 AUTOCITE PARKING CITATION FEES/JAN1920668
001-1204-4201 4,319.87
Total : 4,319.8720668
91346 3/7/2019 EFRAM MOBIL 008115 (PO 14467)VEHICLE FUEL PURCHASES/FEB1901400
715-2101-4310 56.97
715-3104-4310 100.00
Total : 156.9701400
91347 3/7/2019 EMBLEM ENTERPRISES 747201 HBPD BADGE PATCH FOR PSO/CSO UNIFORMS00193
001-2101-4314 342.00
001-2101-4314 48.48
Total : 390.4800193
91348 3/7/2019 FAMILY THEATRE INC Receipt 2001126.003 CANCELLED 2ND STORY THEATRE DATES16932
001-2111 700.00
Total : 700.0016932
91349 3/7/2019 GAGLIA, MICK PO 32777 PER DIEM/TRAINING MANAGER'S WORKSHOP10306
001-2101-4312 45.00
Total : 45.0010306
91350 3/7/2019 GIBSON, EVON PO 33018 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3800204721171
001-3302 38.00
03/07/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4
5:44:25PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 38.00 91350 3/7/2019 GIBSON, EVON21171
91351 3/7/2019 HERNDON RECOGNITION 3211609 RI EMPLOYEE AWARD PINS10517
001-1203-4201 1,822.50
001-1203-4201 210.06
Total : 2,032.5610517
91352 3/7/2019 HONDA MD INC, STEPHAN T Jan-19 (PO 14925)DETAINEE BLOOD DRAW/JAN1915141
001-2101-4201 63.60
Total : 63.6015141
91353 3/7/2019 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS SI00330700 MAT REQ 773278/OFFICE SUPPLIES16742
001-2101-4305 89.58
MAT REQ 973746/MOUSE PAD/MESH ORGANIZERSI00333879
001-1121-4305 23.04
Total : 112.6216742
91354 3/7/2019 IPS GROUP INC 39577 SINGLE SPACE PARKING METER REPAIR19314
001-3302-4309 320.00
100 PARKING METER HOUSINGS/LOCKS40042 (PO 14267)
715-3302-5401 20,502.00
001-3302-4309 2,445.50
Total : 23,267.5019314
91355 3/7/2019 JAMES CHRISTOPHER CONSTRUCTION 12.1116 (PO 14060)CLARK BLDG KITCHEN/CUT FOR NEW PLUMBING09224
301-8689-4201 3,500.00
Total : 3,500.0009224
91356 3/7/2019 KNAPP, RUTH Parcel 4181-021-011 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE07032
001-6871 73.01
105-3105 24.61
Total : 97.6207032
91357 3/7/2019 MANIACI INSURANCE SERVICES 915 (PO 14354)BENEFITS CONNECT ADMINISTRATION/DEC1818312
001-1203-4201 572.22
Total : 572.2218312
91358 3/7/2019 MATSINGER, WILLIAM Parcel 4161-028-088 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE14875
001-6871 121.69
105-3105 24.61
03/07/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
5
5:44:25PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 146.30 91358 3/7/2019 MATSINGER, WILLIAM14875
91359 3/7/2019 MATTHEW MARCUS, MARIA SIMS OR PO 33020 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3001240221255
001-3302 53.00
Total : 53.0021255
91360 3/7/2019 MCCOY, SONIA T Parcel 4185-018-014 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE19117
001-6871 121.69
105-3105 24.61
Total : 146.3019117
91361 3/7/2019 MCGINLEY, LIANNE OR MICHAEL PO 33021 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3500662821256
001-3302 38.00
Total : 38.0021256
91362 3/7/2019 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SERVICES 53585 NOBLE PARK/REPLACE TURF & PLANTERS18071
125-8546-4201 1,881.00
Total : 1,881.0018071
91363 3/7/2019 MILLER, DIANNE M Parcel 4185-018-016 STREET LIGHT TAX REBATE15255
105-3105 24.61
Total : 24.6115255
91364 3/7/2019 NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUP F05750 (PO 14698)'19 FORD F250 STAKE BED18048
715-3104-5403 42,278.01
Total : 42,278.0118048
91365 3/7/2019 OFFICE DEPOT 268422325001 MAT REQ 873396/CHAIR MAT13114
001-4202-4305 62.19
MAT REQ 773756/ENVELOPES FOR 1099S268797199001
001-1202-4305 52.54
REQ 773756/POCKET FILES FOR A/P CHECKS268797907001
001-1202-4305 24.74
OFFICE CHAIR FOR ELLS FREEMAN269982005001
001-4202-4305 322.99
001-4202-4305 30.68
MAT REQ 773910/PENS/POST-ITS271029780001
001-4601-4305 58.64
MAT REQ 773277/OFFICE SUPPLIES271295098001
001-2101-4305 87.90
03/07/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
6
5:44:25PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91365 3/7/2019 (Continued)OFFICE DEPOT13114
MAT REQ 773758/OFFICE SUPPLIES274178996001
001-1202-4305 40.87
001-1208-4305 54.50
MAT REQ 773761/FOLDERS/REGISTER ROLLS278404996001
001-1202-4305 27.58
001-1208-4305 28.45
MAT REQ 973744/OFFICE SUPPLIES279769451001
001-1121-4305 61.16
MAT REQ 773282/OFFICE SUPPLIES280000692001
001-2101-4305 59.55
MAT REQ 973744/OFFICE SUPPLIES280082448001
001-1121-4305 13.39
MAT REQ 973745/CHAIR MAT280084493001
001-1121-4305 62.19
Total : 987.3713114
91366 3/7/2019 ORANGE CO SHERIFFS DEPT TR 778 DROZ/POST SUPERVISORY COURSE02954
001-2101-4317 225.00
Total : 225.0002954
91367 3/7/2019 PARANAGUA, VICTORIA PO 33023 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3700484521259
001-3302 53.00
Total : 53.0021259
91368 3/7/2019 PENA, KARLA PO 33025 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3700541921260
001-3302 48.00
Total : 48.0021260
91369 3/7/2019 PEP BOYS February Statement AUTO SUPPLIES 12/18/18-2/25/1900608
715-2101-4310 397.35
715-2101-4311 95.28
715-3102-4311 171.57
715-3104-4311 79.30
715-3302-4311 41.20
715-4206-4309 10.39
Total : 795.0900608
91370 3/7/2019 PLATA, YUNUEN PO 33042 MILEAGE/BSCC JAIL MANAGER TRAINING18411
03/07/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
7
5:44:25PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91370 3/7/2019 (Continued)PLATA, YUNUEN18411
001-2101-4317 36.54
Total : 36.5418411
91371 3/7/2019 PROSUM TECHNOLOGY SERVICES SIN019226 PO 14224/IT SUPPORT SERVICES/MAR1911539
715-1206-4201 14,830.42
Total : 14,830.4211539
91372 3/7/2019 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 42375036 to 42381494 YARD UNIFORMS, TOWELS, &/OR MATS/FEB1917676
001-2101-4309 66.16
001-3104-4309 48.36
001-3302-4309 59.56
001-4202-4314 400.61
715-4206-4309 39.36
001-4204-4309 159.92
Total : 773.9717676
91373 3/7/2019 RITTENHOUSE, DANIEL PO 33029 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3200396121257
001-3302 53.00
Total : 53.0021257
91374 3/7/2019 RJ PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL 143 2,000 TOW AWAY/NO PARKING SIGNS21153
001-4601-4305 481.00
001-4601-4305 40.95
Total : 521.9521153
91375 3/7/2019 ROBERTSON, KEN TR 771 PER DIEM/YOSEMITE POLICYMAKER CONFERENCE14934
001-4101-4317 200.00
Total : 200.0014934
91376 3/7/2019 SCOLINOS, MARIANN Parcel 4186-027-040 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE14103
001-6871 121.69
105-3105 24.61
Total : 146.3014103
91377 3/7/2019 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 5620019298/PO 14896 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/JAN1907158
001-3104-4201 699.06
Total : 699.0607158
91378 3/7/2019 SOUTH BAY FORD FOW602708 MAT REQ 773433/LIGHT ASSEMBLY/VEHICLE 2210532
03/07/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
8
5:44:25PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91378 3/7/2019 (Continued)SOUTH BAY FORD10532
715-2101-4311 30.87
Total : 30.8710532
91379 3/7/2019 SOUTH BAY PLUMBING PO 33030 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3700602121254
001-3302 48.00
Total : 48.0021254
91380 3/7/2019 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 2-01-414-1071 ELECTRICITY/SEP1800159
105-2601-4303 227.36
001-4204-4303 2,793.21
ELECTRICITY/OCT182-01-414-1071
001-4204-4303 2,518.91
105-2601-4303 206.13
ELECTRICITY/NOV182-01-414-1071
001-4204-4303 2,730.25
105-2601-4303 225.23
ELECTRICITY/DEC182-01-414-1071
001-4204-4303 2,513.98
105-2601-4303 235.41
ELECTRICITY/JAN192-01-414-1071
001-4204-4303 2,348.38
105-2601-4303 249.72
ELECTRICITY/FEB192-01-414-1071
105-2601-4303 236.89
001-4204-4303 2,645.50
ELECTRICITY/FEB192-01-414-3747
105-2601-4303 48.36
ELECTRICITY/FEB192-01-414-5106
001-3104-4303 650.47
ELECTRICITY/FEB192-23-725-4420
001-4204-4303 3,406.41
Total : 21,036.2100159
91381 3/7/2019 SOUTHLAND FIRE ALARM GROUP INC 3146852 JAIL/ANNUAL FIRE ALARM INSPECTION16339
001-2101-4306 300.00
Total : 300.0016339
91382 3/7/2019 TANORI CONSTRUCTION & CUSTOM PO 33031 CITATION NO. 39006652 OVERPAYMENT21253
03/07/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
9
5:44:25PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91382 3/7/2019 (Continued)TANORI CONSTRUCTION & CUSTOM21253
001-3302 30.00
Total : 30.0021253
91383 3/7/2019 THE PUN GROUP LLP 111934 (PO 13581)FINANCIAL AUDIT SERVICES/FYE 6/30/1817596
001-1202-4201 2,067.00
Total : 2,067.0017596
91384 3/7/2019 TIREHUB LLC 5231591 MAT REQ 773355/VEHICLE 6 & 53/TIRES21146
715-3302-4311 489.53
Total : 489.5321146
91385 3/7/2019 T-MOBILE Account 946625962 PD/CSO/CELL PHONES/FEB1919082
001-2101-4304 210.86
001-3302-4304 40.38
YARD/CELL PHONES/FEB19Account 954297746
001-4202-4304 341.10
Total : 592.3419082
91386 3/7/2019 TORRANCE AUTO PARTS 210665 thru 211799 AUTO REPAIR/MAINTENANCE PARTS/FEB1916735
715-2101-4311 285.09
001-2021 5.29
001-2022 -5.29
Total : 285.0916735
91387 3/7/2019 TURNINGWEST, INC.905 CD/TEAMBUILDING CONSULTING21252
001-1203-4317 5,850.00
Total : 5,850.0021252
91388 3/7/2019 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, PARS #6746019200PO 14263 PARS/OPEB CONTRIBUTIONS/MAR1914528
161-3109-4190 255.42
160-3102-4190 302.17
001-1101-4190 135.42
001-1121-4190 600.50
001-1201-4190 2,191.83
001-1202-4190 2,199.83
001-1203-4190 587.67
001-1204-4190 2,140.67
001-1208-4190 481.17
001-2101-4190 37,186.33
03/07/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
10
5:44:25PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91388 3/7/2019 (Continued)UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, PARS #674601920014528
001-2203-4190 10,914.50
001-3104-4190 1,851.75
001-3301-4190 138.42
001-3302-4190 6,759.08
001-4101-4190 2,528.83
001-4201-4190 2,556.25
001-4202-4190 2,203.50
001-4204-4190 1,457.50
001-4601-4190 1,362.75
001-6101-4190 1,915.50
105-2601-4190 717.08
715-4206-4190 1,130.83
Total : 79,617.0014528
91389 3/7/2019 UPS 000023R146089 SHIP BODY CAMS TO AXON (VENDOR)~14148
001-2101-4305 9.59
Total : 9.5914148
91390 3/7/2019 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 71054284 VOIP PHONES/YARD/JAN1918666
001-4202-4304 143.87
VOIP PHONES/BARD/JAN1971054422
001-3302-4304 69.28
VOIP PHONES/EOC GYM/JAN1971054429
001-1201-4304 61.37
VOIP PHONES/BASE 3/JAN1971054667
001-3302-4304 107.92
Total : 382.4418666
91391 3/7/2019 VITAL MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC 2452 OK TO BOOK MEDICAL EXAM FEES/DR 19-0049320944
001-2101-4201 168.00
Total : 168.0020944
91392 3/7/2019 WADA, DEREK PO 33035 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3600203921258
001-3302 48.00
Total : 48.0021258
91393 3/7/2019 WESTWOOD BUILDING SUPPLY 1902-294005 CEMENT TOOLS03739
001-3104-4309 19.28
03/07/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
11
5:44:25PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
91393 3/7/2019 (Continued)WESTWOOD BUILDING SUPPLY03739
001-3104-4309 202.90
Total : 222.1803739
91394 3/7/2019 YOUNG, DONALD CURTIS PO 33044 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/CLASS NO. 779415815
001-4601-4221 168.00
Total : 168.0015815
530159590 2/25/2019 SOCAL GAS 3/7/19 Check Run GAS BILLS/JAN1900170
001-4204-4303 186.66
Total : 186.6600170
1921640045 3/1/2019 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 3/7/19 Check Run WORK COMP CLAIMS REIMB/FEB1914691
705-1217-4324 6,154.43
Total : 6,154.4314691
1934151570 3/5/2019 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 3/7/19 Check Run WORK COMP CLAIMS REIMB/FEB19-MAR1914691
705-1217-4324 4,984.56
Total : 4,984.5614691
1935482614 3/5/2019 J P MORGAN 3/7/19 Check Run BEACH DR UNDERGROUNDING BOND/INTEREST14299
611-2252 3,920.54
Total : 3,920.5414299
Bank total : 322,450.17 73 Vouchers for bank code :boa
322,450.17Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 73
03/07/2019
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
12
5:44:25PM
Page:
Bank code :boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
"I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the
checks listed on pages 1 to 12 inclusive, of the check
register for 3/7/19 are accurate funds are available for
payment, and are in conformance to the budget."
By
Finance Director
Date 3/11/9
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0188
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2018
REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT,
AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR FEBRUARY 2019
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the February 2019 Financial Reports.
Summary:
Attached are the February 2019 Revenue and Expenditure reports.The reports provide detail by
revenue account and by department for expenditures,with summaries by fund at the end of each
report.
General Fund revenue is 58.4%received for 66.7%of the fiscal year.The General Fund revenue,
particularly tax revenue,is not received incrementally.Adjusting for tax revenue would bring the total
to 65.6%.
General Fund expenditures are 60.9%expended for 66.7%of the fiscal year.Expenditures do not
necessarily occur on an incremental basis.
This CIP Report groups the funding for each project together,which is similar to how the projects are
shown in the budget.In the regular Expenditure Report,the CIPs appear at the end of each fund,
therefore, the total funding is not displayed in one place.
Attachments:
1.Feb 2019 Revenue Report
2.Feb 2019 Expenditure Report
3.Feb 2019 CIP Project Report
Respectfully Submitted by: Viki Copeland, Finance Director
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3101 Current Year Secured 14,471,432.00 8,064,923.79 8,064,923.79 6,406,508.21 55.73
3102 Current Year Unsecured 553,090.00 497,765.92 497,765.92 55,324.08 90.00
3103 Prior Year Collections 0.00 -9,799.22 -9,799.22 9,799.22 0.00
3104 In-lieu Sales Tax 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3106 Supplemental Roll SB813 366,471.00 231,417.12 231,417.12 135,053.88 63.15
3107 Transfer Tax 274,000.00 163,770.21 163,770.21 110,229.79 59.77
3108 Sales Tax 3,156,000.00 1,801,029.50 1,801,029.50 1,354,970.50 57.07
3109 1/2 Cent Sales Tx Ext 230,988.00 120,907.10 120,907.10 110,080.90 52.34
3110 Spectrum Cable TV Franchise 171,585.00 88,564.95 88,564.95 83,020.05 51.62
3111 Electric Franchise 82,259.00 0.00 0.00 82,259.00 0.00
3112 Gas Franchise 38,596.00 0.00 0.00 38,596.00 0.00
3113 Refuse Franchise 242,000.00 156,427.76 156,427.76 85,572.24 64.64
3114 Transient Occupancy Tax 3,296,000.00 1,935,196.10 1,935,196.10 1,360,803.90 58.71
3115 Business License 1,070,000.00 567,061.35 567,061.35 502,938.65 53.00
3120 Utility User Tax 2,250,177.00 1,327,591.20 1,327,591.20 922,585.80 59.00
3122 Property tax In-lieu of Veh Lic Fees 2,659,922.00 1,365,088.11 1,365,088.11 1,294,833.89 51.32
3123 Frontier Cable Franchise Fee 188,000.00 92,808.14 92,808.14 95,191.86 49.37
Total Taxes 56.46 29,050,520.00 16,402,752.03 16,402,752.03 12,647,767.97
3200 Licenses And Permits
3202 Dog Licenses 12,600.00 10,956.00 10,956.00 1,644.00 86.95
3203 Bicycle Licenses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
2
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3204 Building Permits 857,000.00 431,762.08 431,762.08 425,237.92 50.38
3205 Electric Permits 96,530.00 54,596.00 54,596.00 41,934.00 56.56
3206 Plumbing Permits 65,000.00 52,260.00 52,260.00 12,740.00 80.40
3207 Occupancy Permits 13,100.00 11,522.00 11,522.00 1,578.00 87.95
3208 Grease Trap Permits 1,280.00 1,459.00 1,459.00 -179.00 113.98
3209 Garage Sales 119.00 126.00 126.00 -7.00 105.88
3211 Banner Permits 1,546.00 898.00 898.00 648.00 58.09
3212 Animal/Fowl Permits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3213 Animal Redemption Fee 344.00 443.00 443.00 -99.00 128.78
3214 Amplified Sound Permit 10,334.00 5,327.00 5,327.00 5,007.00 51.55
3215 Temporary Sign Permit 1,558.00 1,728.00 1,728.00 -170.00 110.91
3216 Spray Booth Permit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3217 Open Fire Permit 0.00 509.00 509.00 -509.00 0.00
3218 Auto Repair Permit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3219 Newsrack Permits 1,400.00 0.00 0.00 1,400.00 0.00
3220 Commercial St Light Banner Program 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3225 Taxicab Franchise Fees 356.00 356.00 356.00 0.00 100.00
3226 Admin Permit - Limited Outdoor Seating 977.00 479.00 479.00 498.00 49.03
3227 Mechanical Permits 44,800.00 30,077.00 30,077.00 14,723.00 67.14
3228 Concealed Weapons Permit 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00
3229 Private Special Event Permit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3230 Temporary Minor Special Event Permit 2,395.00 4,387.00 4,387.00 -1,992.00 183.17
3232 Second-Single Family Dweling Permit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3233 Emergency Shelters Permit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
3
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3234 Single-Room Occupancy Permit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3235 Outdor Fitness Permit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3236 Drone Permit Fee 2,900.00 2,255.00 2,255.00 645.00 77.76
3239 A-Frame sign Permit 500.00 1,077.00 1,077.00 -577.00 215.40
Total Licenses And Permits 54.83 1,112,839.00 610,217.08 610,217.08 502,621.92
3300 Fines & Forfeitures
3301 Municipal Court Fines 96,439.00 65,327.43 65,327.43 31,111.57 67.74
3302 Court Fines /Parking 1,981,749.00 1,416,900.17 1,416,900.17 564,848.83 71.50
3305 Administrative Fines 15,650.00 21,200.00 21,200.00 -5,550.00 135.46
3306 Nuisance Abatement- Restrooms 33,000.00 23,250.00 23,250.00 9,750.00 70.45
Total Fines & Forfeitures 71.78 2,126,838.00 1,526,677.60 1,526,677.60 600,160.40
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 208,935.00 87,136.03 87,136.03 121,798.97 41.70
3402 Rents & Concessions 1,500.00 1,088.35 1,088.35 411.65 72.56
3403 Pier Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3404 Community Center Leases 25,500.00 19,051.20 19,051.20 6,448.80 74.71
3405 Community Center Rentals 180,000.00 99,708.73 99,708.73 80,291.27 55.39
3406 Community Center Theatre 115,000.00 77,103.25 77,103.25 37,896.75 67.05
3411 Other Facilities 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3412 Tennis Courts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3414 Fund Exchange 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3418 Special Events 70,000.00 34,489.26 34,489.26 35,510.74 49.27
3Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3419 Revenue-Centennial Celeb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3422 Beach/Plaza Promotions 30,000.00 10,868.00 10,868.00 19,132.00 36.23
3425 Ground Lease 39,546.00 26,254.40 26,254.40 13,291.60 66.39
3427 Cell Site License- Sprint 38,793.00 25,616.46 25,616.46 13,176.54 66.03
3428 Cell Site License - Verizon 32,820.00 21,609.76 21,609.76 11,210.24 65.84
3429 Inmate Phone Services 948.00 653.96 653.96 294.04 68.98
3431 Storage Facility Operating Lease 180,000.00 120,000.00 120,000.00 60,000.00 66.67
3432 Film Permits 75,000.00 102,868.00 102,868.00 -27,868.00 137.16
3450 Investment Discount 1,035.00 215.75 215.75 819.25 20.85
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3476 Solid Waste Lease Space 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 62.72 999,077.00 626,663.15 626,663.15 372,413.85
3500 Intergovernmental/State
3505 In Lieu Motor Vehicle 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3507 Highway Maintenance 3,100.00 1,550.00 1,550.00 1,550.00 50.00
3508 Mandated Costs 7,539.00 7,619.34 7,619.34 -80.34 101.07
3509 Homeowner Property Tax Relief 84,000.00 41,361.36 41,361.36 42,638.64 49.24
3510 POST 22,365.00 2,612.82 2,612.82 19,752.18 11.68
3511 STC-Service Officer Training 4,620.00 2,310.00 2,310.00 2,310.00 50.00
3575 VLF Coll Excess of $14m-Rev code 11001.5 10,326.00 9,443.09 9,443.09 882.91 91.45
Total Intergovernmental/State 49.18 131,950.00 64,896.61 64,896.61 67,053.39
3800 Current Service Charges
4Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
5
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3801 Residential Inspection 49,003.00 24,390.00 24,390.00 24,613.00 49.77
3802 Planning Sign Permit/Master Sign Program 16,484.00 10,648.00 10,648.00 5,836.00 64.60
3803 Negative Declaration 0.00 3,401.00 3,401.00 -3,401.00 0.00
3804 General Plan Maintenance Fees 217,000.00 90,627.00 90,627.00 126,373.00 41.76
3805 Amendment to Planning Entitlement 16,496.00 6,266.50 6,266.50 10,229.50 37.99
3806 Board Of Appeals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3807 Refuse Lien Fees/Consolidated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3808 Zone Variance Review 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3809 Tentative Map Review 9,098.00 9,098.00 9,098.00 0.00 100.00
3810 Final Map Review 8,100.00 3,401.00 3,401.00 4,699.00 41.99
3811 Zone Change 3,902.00 3,902.00 3,902.00 0.00 100.00
3812 Conditional Use Permit - Comm/Other 4,681.00 4,864.00 4,864.00 -183.00 103.91
3813 Plan Check Fees 408,000.00 252,363.57 252,363.57 155,636.43 61.85
3814 Appeal to City Council From Staff 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3815 Public Works Services 129,662.00 69,540.31 69,540.31 60,121.69 53.63
3816 Utility Trench Service Connect Permit 102,291.00 64,451.61 64,451.61 37,839.39 63.01
3817 Address Change Request Fee 3,248.00 1,642.00 1,642.00 1,606.00 50.55
3818 Police Services 1,000.00 430.00 430.00 570.00 43.00
3819 Jail Services 13,540.00 11,685.00 11,685.00 1,855.00 86.30
3821 Daily Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 53,000.00 34,224.00 34,224.00 18,776.00 64.57
3823 Special Event Security/Police 60,000.00 65,634.78 65,634.78 -5,634.78 109.39
3824 500' Noticing 12,940.00 3,982.00 3,982.00 8,958.00 30.77
3825 Public Notice Posting 3,825.00 1,953.00 1,953.00 1,872.00 51.06
3827 Library Grounds Maintenance 18,527.00 0.00 0.00 18,527.00 0.00
5Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
6
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3831 Non-Utility Street Excavation Permit 50,451.00 36,363.00 36,363.00 14,088.00 72.08
3833 Recreation Service Charges 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3834 Encroachment Permit 319,281.00 187,091.80 187,091.80 132,189.20 58.60
3835 Youth Sports Admin Fee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3836 Refund Transaction Fee 900.00 660.00 660.00 240.00 73.33
3837 Returned Check Charge 300.00 239.00 239.00 61.00 79.67
3838 Sale Of Maps/Publications 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3839 Photocopy Charges 400.00 223.20 223.20 176.80 55.80
3840 Ambulance Transport 508,425.00 363,410.24 363,410.24 145,014.76 71.48
3841 Police Towing 73,850.00 50,770.00 50,770.00 23,080.00 68.75
3842 Parking Meters 2,010,715.00 1,297,354.89 1,297,354.89 713,360.11 64.52
3843 Parking Permits-Annual 426,000.00 193,213.50 193,213.50 232,786.50 45.36
3844 Daily Parking Permits 1,820.00 1,352.87 1,352.87 467.13 74.33
3845 Lot A Revenue 564,607.00 358,664.25 358,664.25 205,942.75 63.52
3846 No Pier Pkg Structure Revenue 715,604.00 453,070.50 453,070.50 262,533.50 63.31
3847 In Lieu Fee / Parking Facility 57,800.00 0.00 0.00 57,800.00 0.00
3848 Driveway Permits 1,590.00 1,942.00 1,942.00 -352.00 122.14
3849 Guest Permits 1,736.00 1,159.00 1,159.00 577.00 66.76
3850 Contractors Permits 40,000.00 25,160.00 25,160.00 14,840.00 62.90
3851 Cash Key Revenue -554.00 24.50 24.50 -578.50 -4.42
3852 Recreation Program Transaction Fee 44,000.00 26,555.00 26,555.00 17,445.00 60.35
3855 Bus Passes 2,200.00 838.00 838.00 1,362.00 38.09
3856 500' - 2nd Noticing 515.00 0.00 0.00 515.00 0.00
3857 Parking Plan Application 4,320.00 4,488.00 4,488.00 -168.00 103.89
6Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
7
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3858 Monthly Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 97,000.00 71,300.00 71,300.00 25,700.00 73.51
3859 Admin Permit - Abandon CUP 619.00 619.00 619.00 0.00 100.00
3860 Car2Go Parking Fee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3861 Fire Alarm Sys Insp - New Installation 0.00 382.00 382.00 -382.00 0.00
3862 Alarm Permit Fee 5,415.00 2,066.00 2,066.00 3,349.00 38.15
3863 False Alarm Fee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3864 C.U.P./Fences/Walls 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3865 Lot B Revenue 107,000.00 65,195.25 65,195.25 41,804.75 60.93
3867 Precise Development Plans 5,114.00 2,557.00 2,557.00 2,557.00 50.00
3868 Public Noticing/300 Ft Radius 10,350.00 4,698.00 4,698.00 5,652.00 45.39
3869 2nd Party Response 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3870 Legal Determination Hearing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3871 Passport Processing Fee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3872 Passport Photo Fee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3876 Spec Fire Protectn Sys Insp-New Install 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3877 Business License Registration 7,000.00 7,375.00 7,375.00 -375.00 105.36
3878 Fire Re-Inspections 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3879 Business License Renewal Fee 37,000.00 24,659.00 24,659.00 12,341.00 66.65
3882 Special Event Fire Code Permit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3883 Final/Tentative Map Extension 949.00 0.00 0.00 949.00 0.00
3884 Lot Line Adjustment 1,176.00 0.00 0.00 1,176.00 0.00
3886 Text Amendment/Private 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3888 Slope/Grade Height Determination 5,444.00 2,252.50 2,252.50 3,191.50 41.38
3890 300 Ft Radius Noticing/Appeal to CC 474.00 232.00 232.00 242.00 48.95
7Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
8
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3891 Appeal of Plng Comm Action to Council 1,681.00 0.00 0.00 1,681.00 0.00
3892 Underground Tank Install/Removal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3893 Contract Recreation Classes 390,000.00 231,622.10 231,622.10 158,377.90 59.39
3894 Other Recreation Programs 245,000.00 119,662.17 119,662.17 125,337.83 48.84
3895 Zoning Information Letters 0.00 572.00 572.00 -572.00 0.00
3896 Mailing Fee 12.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00
3897 Admin Fee/TULIP Ins Certificate 1,200.00 1,421.58 1,421.58 -221.58 118.47
3898 Height Limit Exception 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3899 Condo - CUP/PDP 34,667.00 24,495.00 24,495.00 10,172.00 70.66
Total Current Service Charges 61.18 6,904,858.00 4,224,192.12 4,224,192.12 2,680,665.88
3900 Other Revenue
3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 116.00 2,024.82 2,024.82 -1,908.82 1745.53
3903 Contributions Non Govt 23,309.00 23,309.00 23,309.00 0.00 100.00
3904 General Miscellaneous 11,914.00 12,734.74 12,734.74 -820.74 106.89
3905 Cable Franchise Acceptance Fee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3907 Pkg Str Utility Reimb From Beach House 3,700.00 1,925.89 1,925.89 1,774.11 52.05
3908 Hermosa Sr Ctr Donations/Memberships 8,500.00 4,983.40 4,983.40 3,516.60 58.63
3914 Planning EIR Admin Reimbursement 30,000.00 2,620.09 2,620.09 27,379.91 8.73
3920 BCHD Healthy Cities Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3938 Solid Waste Contract Admin Fee 52,707.00 34,625.32 34,625.32 18,081.68 65.69
3945 In-Serv Firefighter Trng Prog/El Camino 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3955 Operating Transfers In 536,791.00 357,664.00 357,664.00 179,127.00 66.63
8Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
9
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3960 Verizon PEG Grant 12,187.00 10,444.00 10,444.00 1,743.00 85.70
3961 Chamber Funding Econ Dev 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3962 Election Reimbursement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3963 HB Youth Enrichment Program Fee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3964 South Park Donations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3967 Athens Reimbursement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Revenue 66.30 679,224.00 450,331.26 450,331.26 228,892.74
6800 Current Service Charges Continued
6801 Mural Review 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 0.00 100.00
6802 Sign Variance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6803 General Plan Amendment/ Map or Text 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6804 Temporary Use Permit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6805 Unusual Architectural/Building Rev 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6806 Determination of Similar Use 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6807 Planning Commission Interpretation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6808 Request for Reasonable Accomodation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6809 Categorical Exemption 1,800.00 1,274.00 1,274.00 526.00 70.78
6810 Deed Restriction/Covenant Review 5,306.00 5,306.00 5,306.00 0.00 100.00
6811 Landscape Plan Review 8,520.00 8,258.00 8,258.00 262.00 96.92
6812 Planning Landscape Doc Package Review 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6813 Preliminary Plan Review 1,736.00 1,642.00 1,642.00 94.00 94.59
6814 Extra Meeting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6815 Special Meeting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
10
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
6816 Traffic/Special Study Review 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6818 New/Modified Business Zoning Review 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6819 Historic Resource Review 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6820 Appeal to the Planning Commission 0.00 2,550.00 2,550.00 -2,550.00 0.00
6821 Solar Plan Check/Inspection 2,725.00 3,002.50 3,002.50 -277.50 110.18
6822 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6823 Damaged Building Inspection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6824 Extended Construction Hours Review 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6825 Clean Bay Restaurant - NPDES Inspection 20,600.00 11,120.00 11,120.00 9,480.00 53.98
6826 Light Industry - NPDES Inspection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6827 Stormwater Mitigation Plan Review 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6828 Public Improvement Plan Check 57,873.00 38,460.00 38,460.00 19,413.00 66.46
6829 Street/Row Vacation Review 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6830 Engineering Study Review 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6831 Assessment District Formation Research 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6832 DUI Collision Response 581.00 0.00 0.00 581.00 0.00
6833 Vehicle Identification Verification 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6834 Citation Sign-off 943.00 559.00 559.00 384.00 59.28
6835 Taxicab Inspection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6836 Police Business Background Check 273.00 0.00 0.00 273.00 0.00
6837 Deceased Animal Pickup 116.00 57.00 57.00 59.00 49.14
6838 Animal Trap Rental 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6839 Pet Home Quarantine Review 59.00 0.00 0.00 59.00 0.00
6840 Multiple Dog Review 112.00 0.00 0.00 112.00 0.00
10Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
11
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
6841 Fire Sprinkler System Insp - New Install 750.00 750.00 750.00 0.00 100.00
6842 Miscellaneous Fire Code Permit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6843 State Mandated Fire Inspection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6844 Fire False Alarm Response 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6845 Hazardous Materials Spill Response 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6846 Parking Cash Key Processing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6847 Document Certification 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00
6848 Fire Standby Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6849 Traffic Plan Review 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6850 Annual Business Fire Inspection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6851 Busines Licenses State Mandated Fee 0.00 6,640.30 6,640.30 -6,640.30 0.00
6852 Centennial Sweatshir 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6860 Refuse Lien Fees/Athens 350.00 388.12 388.12 -38.12 110.89
6861 Oversized Vehicle Permit 674.00 416.00 416.00 258.00 61.72
6862 Athens Reimbursement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6866 Records Technology Fee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6867 Credit Card Processing Fee 50,000.00 43,081.74 43,081.74 6,918.26 86.16
6868 Alternate Materials/Methods Review 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6869 Disabled Parking Space Install 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6870 Public Tree Install Review 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6871 Sewer Service Charge Rebate -11,000.00 -5,101.81 -5,101.81 -5,898.19 46.38
6872 PY Sewer Service Charge Rebate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6873 Impound Fee- Bicycle, Scooters & Wheeled 0.00 130.00 130.00 -130.00 0.00
6874 Limited Live Entertainment Permit Fee 0.00 500.00 500.00 -500.00 0.00
11Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
12
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
Total Current Service Charges Continued 84.33 142,928.00 120,532.85 120,532.85 22,395.15
17,121,971.30 24,026,262.70 24,026,262.70 41,148,234.00 58.39Total General Fund
12Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
13
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund105
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3101 Current Year Secured 454,988.00 276,567.78 276,567.78 178,420.22 60.79
3103 Prior Year Collections 5,122.00 4,009.09 4,009.09 1,112.91 78.27
3105 Assessment Rebates -4,184.00 -1,427.38 -1,427.38 -2,756.62 34.12
Total Taxes 61.23 455,926.00 279,149.49 279,149.49 176,776.51
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 487.00 289.96 289.96 197.04 59.54
3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.60 0.60 -0.60 0.00
3460 Unrealized Gain(Loss) On Inv 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 59.66 487.00 290.56 290.56 196.44
3900 Other Revenue
3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3904 General Miscellaneous 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3955 Operating Transfers In 210,463.00 140,312.00 140,312.00 70,151.00 66.67
Total Other Revenue 66.67 210,463.00 140,312.00 140,312.00 70,151.00
247,123.95 419,752.05 419,752.05 666,876.00 62.94Total Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund
13Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
14
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
State Gas Tax Fund115
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 5,659.00 3,109.74 3,109.74 2,549.26 54.95
3450 Investment Discount 7.00 10.88 10.88 -3.88 155.43
3460 Unrealized Gain(Loss) On Inv 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 55.08 5,666.00 3,120.62 3,120.62 2,545.38
3500 Intergovernmental/State
3501 Section 2106 Allocation 69,818.00 39,162.86 39,162.86 30,655.14 56.09
3502 Section 2107 Allocation 144,605.00 75,238.39 75,238.39 69,366.61 52.03
3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 100.00
3512 Section 2105 (Prop 111) 110,103.00 61,709.58 61,709.58 48,393.42 56.05
3513 Sec 2103 Higher Mtr Veh Excise Tax(HUTA) 69,785.00 45,953.71 45,953.71 23,831.29 65.85
3522 TDA Article 3/Local 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3566 Loan Repayment- HUTA Transportation Fds 22,185.00 22,185.33 22,185.33 -0.33 100.00
3567 Road Maintenance Rehab Account 311,955.00 182,064.55 182,064.55 129,890.45 58.36
Total Intergovernmental/State 58.75 732,451.00 430,314.42 430,314.42 302,136.58
304,681.96 433,435.04 433,435.04 738,117.00 58.72Total State Gas Tax Fund
14Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
15
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
AB939 Fund117
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 1,444.00 821.55 821.55 622.45 56.89
3450 Investment Discount 3.00 2.62 2.62 0.38 87.33
3460 Unrealized Gain(Loss) On Inv 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 56.96 1,447.00 824.17 824.17 622.83
3800 Current Service Charges
3860 AB939 Surcharge 58,632.00 39,140.22 39,140.22 19,491.78 66.76
3874 Compost/Worm Bin 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Current Service Charges 66.76 58,632.00 39,140.22 39,140.22 19,491.78
3900 Other Revenue
3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6800 Current Service Charges Continued
6853 Solid Waste Contracting Fee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Current Service Charges Continued 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
20,114.61 39,964.39 39,964.39 60,079.00 66.52Total AB939 Fund
15Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
16
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Prop A Open Space Fund121
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3600 Intergovernmental/County
3608 Maintenance Allocation 20,557.00 0.00 0.00 20,557.00 0.00
3613 Beach Restroom Rehab/Co Share 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3630 Maint Allocation-Pier Structural Repairs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3631 South Park Phase I Improvements Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
20,557.00 0.00 0.00 20,557.00 0.00Total Prop A Open Space Fund
16Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
17
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Tyco Fund122
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 25,161.00 13,988.87 13,988.87 11,172.13 55.60
3426 Easement Agreement 318,845.00 268,018.44 268,018.44 50,826.56 84.06
3450 Investment Discount 52.00 46.67 46.67 5.33 89.75
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
62,004.02 282,053.98 282,053.98 344,058.00 81.98Total Tyco Fund
17Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
18
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3116 Parks & Recreation Facility Tax 14,986.00 14,986.00 14,986.00 0.00 100.00
Total Taxes 100.00 14,986.00 14,986.00 14,986.00 0.00
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 6,088.00 3,869.41 3,869.41 2,218.59 63.56
3450 Investment Discount 15.00 12.62 12.62 2.38 84.13
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 63.61 6,103.00 3,882.03 3,882.03 2,220.97
3900 Other Revenue
3903 Contributions Non Govt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3910 Park/Recreation In Lieu Fee 157,361.00 184,511.00 184,511.00 -27,150.00 117.25
Total Other Revenue 117.25 157,361.00 184,511.00 184,511.00 -27,150.00
-24,929.03 203,379.03 203,379.03 178,450.00 113.97Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund
18Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
19
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund135
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 74.00 36.07 36.07 37.93 48.74
Total Use Of Money & Property 48.74 74.00 36.07 36.07 37.93
3900 Other Revenue
3925 Spec Assessment Admin Fees 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 0.00 100.00
Total Other Revenue 100.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 0.00
37.93 4,536.07 4,536.07 4,574.00 99.17Total Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund
19Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
20
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund136
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3900 Other Revenue
3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Total Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund
20Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
21
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund137
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 201.00 58.24 58.24 142.76 28.98
Total Use Of Money & Property 28.98 201.00 58.24 58.24 142.76
3900 Other Revenue
3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 9,000.00 0.00
Total Other Revenue 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 9,000.00
9,142.76 58.24 58.24 9,201.00 0.63Total Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund
21Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
22
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund138
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 455.00 186.65 186.65 268.35 41.02
Total Use Of Money & Property 41.02 455.00 186.65 186.65 268.35
3900 Other Revenue
3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00
Total Other Revenue 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00
10,268.35 186.65 186.65 10,455.00 1.79Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund
22Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
23
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund139
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 81.00 39.15 39.15 41.85 48.33
Total Use Of Money & Property 48.33 81.00 39.15 39.15 41.85
3900 Other Revenue
3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 0.00 100.00
Total Other Revenue 100.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 0.00
41.85 3,539.15 3,539.15 3,581.00 98.83Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund
23Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
24
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Community Dev Block Grant140
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3700 Intergovernmental/Federal
3715 CDBG Administration 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3720 Americans with Disabilities Act 270,000.00 0.00 0.00 270,000.00 0.00
270,000.00 0.00 0.00 270,000.00 0.00Total Community Dev Block Grant
24Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
25
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition A Fund145
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3117 Proposition A Transit 383,939.00 268,599.82 268,599.82 115,339.18 69.96
Total Taxes 69.96 383,939.00 268,599.82 268,599.82 115,339.18
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 37,874.00 20,577.30 20,577.30 17,296.70 54.33
3450 Investment Discount 106.00 67.98 67.98 38.02 64.13
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 54.36 37,980.00 20,645.28 20,645.28 17,334.72
3800 Current Service Charges
3853 Dial-A-Taxi Program 4,600.00 3,220.00 3,220.00 1,380.00 70.00
3855 Bus Passes 600.00 393.60 393.60 206.40 65.60
Total Current Service Charges 69.49 5,200.00 3,613.60 3,613.60 1,586.40
134,260.30 292,858.70 292,858.70 427,119.00 68.57Total Proposition A Fund
25Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
26
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition C Fund146
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3118 Proposition C Local Return 318,467.00 222,796.30 222,796.30 95,670.70 69.96
Total Taxes 69.96 318,467.00 222,796.30 222,796.30 95,670.70
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 35,063.00 16,097.61 16,097.61 18,965.39 45.91
3450 Investment Discount 111.00 54.60 54.60 56.40 49.19
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 45.92 35,174.00 16,152.21 16,152.21 19,021.79
114,692.49 238,948.51 238,948.51 353,641.00 67.57Total Proposition C Fund
26Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
27
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Measure R Fund147
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3119 Measure R Local Return Funds 238,856.00 167,250.92 167,250.92 71,605.08 70.02
Total Taxes 70.02 238,856.00 167,250.92 167,250.92 71,605.08
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 26,015.00 13,848.74 13,848.74 12,166.26 53.23
3450 Investment Discount 64.00 46.56 46.56 17.44 72.75
3460 Unrealized Gain(Loss) On Inv 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 53.28 26,079.00 13,895.30 13,895.30 12,183.70
3900 Other Revenue
3970 Measure R SBCCOG South Bay Highway Pr 399,922.00 15,596.66 15,596.66 384,325.34 3.90
Total Other Revenue 3.90 399,922.00 15,596.66 15,596.66 384,325.34
468,114.12 196,742.88 196,742.88 664,857.00 29.59Total Measure R Fund
27Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
28
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Measure M148
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3118 Local Returns 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3119 Measure R Local Return Funds 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3131 Measure M Local Return Funds 270,697.00 188,121.10 188,121.10 82,575.90 69.50
Total Taxes 69.50 270,697.00 188,121.10 188,121.10 82,575.90
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 5,941.00 4,222.51 4,222.51 1,718.49 71.07
3450 Investment Discount 0.00 13.35 13.35 -13.35 0.00
3460 Unrealized Gain(Loss) On Inv 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 71.30 5,941.00 4,235.86 4,235.86 1,705.14
3900 Other Revenue
3970 Measure R SBCCOG South Bay Highway Pr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
84,281.04 192,356.96 192,356.96 276,638.00 69.53Total Measure M
28Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
29
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3500 Intergovernmental/State
3558 Beverage Recycling Grant 31,881.00 0.00 0.00 31,881.00 0.00
3562 State Homeland Security Grant Program 83,911.00 0.00 0.00 83,911.00 0.00
3566 Coastal Conservancy Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3571 Local Coastal Assistance Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3572 Local Coastal Assistance Grant 2017 82,812.00 5,936.24 5,936.24 76,875.76 7.17
3573 Alcoholic Beverage Control Grant (ABC) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3580 BSCC- Mental Health Evaluation Team 21,854.00 0.00 0.00 21,854.00 0.00
3581 SWRCB- Storm Water Grant Program 1,349,700.00 0.00 0.00 1,349,700.00 0.00
3582 2017 State Homeland Security Program 83,911.00 0.00 0.00 83,911.00 0.00
Total Intergovernmental/State 0.36 1,654,069.00 5,936.24 5,936.24 1,648,132.76
3700 Intergovernmental/Federal
3732 STPL Street Improvement Reimb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3734 Solar Grant TBD/Energy Upgrades 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3736 Bulletproof Vest Partnership 2,499.00 0.00 0.00 2,499.00 0.00
3740 SWRCB (ARRA)/Strand Infiltration Trench 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3741 SWRCB (ARRA)/Pier Ave Impr Project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3742 STPL Pier St Impr Grant CIP 129 (ARRA) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3745 Energy Eff & Conserv Block Grant (ARRA) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3746 State Safe Routes to School (SR2S) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3747 Fed HSIP Grnt-Valley School Signal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3748 Gen Plan/Coastal/Strat Growth Council 23,013.00 0.00 0.00 23,013.00 0.00
29Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
30
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3749 SCE Rule 20A Funds/PCH Beautification 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3750 Dept of Justice- Body Worn Cameras 41,681.00 0.00 0.00 41,681.00 0.00
Total Intergovernmental/Federal 0.00 67,193.00 0.00 0.00 67,193.00
3900 Other Revenue
3965 Fireman's Fund Emerg Prep Prog Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3966 West Basin WD Grant- Reclaimed Waterline 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3970 Melchione Trust- Surf Memorial 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3971 LA Country Library 43,308.00 0.00 0.00 43,308.00 0.00
3972 Caltrans Reimbursement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3973 Caltrans Cooperative Agreement PCH&2nd 134,000.00 134,000.00 134,000.00 0.00 100.00
3974 South Park- Prop A Open Space Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3980 SWGP- Manhattan Beach Reimb 36,996.00 0.00 0.00 36,996.00 0.00
3981 SWGP- Redondo Beach Reimb 751,771.00 0.00 0.00 751,771.00 0.00
3982 SWGP- Torrance Reimb 489,834.00 0.00 0.00 489,834.00 0.00
3983 City Homelessness Planning Grant 2,364.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 -12,636.00 634.52
3984 Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program 84,150.00 0.00 0.00 84,150.00 0.00
3985 California Green Business Program 30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 0.00 100.00
Total Other Revenue 11.38 1,572,423.00 179,000.00 179,000.00 1,393,423.00
3,108,748.76 184,936.24 184,936.24 3,293,685.00 5.61Total Grants Fund
30Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
31
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund152
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 1,068.00 128.81 128.81 939.19 12.06
3450 Investment Discount 5.00 0.18 0.18 4.82 3.60
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 12.02 1,073.00 128.99 128.99 944.01
3500 Intergovernmental/State
3538 AQMD Emission Control AB2766 47,966.00 29,346.11 29,346.11 18,619.89 61.18
3551 MSRC Discretionary Matching Funds 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Intergovernmental/State 61.18 47,966.00 29,346.11 29,346.11 18,619.89
19,563.90 29,475.10 29,475.10 49,039.00 60.11Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund
31Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
32
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)153
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3135 C.O.P.S. Allocation 100,000.00 124,732.26 124,732.26 -24,732.26 124.73
Total Taxes 124.73 100,000.00 124,732.26 124,732.26 -24,732.26
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 6,244.00 3,161.50 3,161.50 3,082.50 50.63
3450 Investment Discount 10.00 10.24 10.24 -0.24 102.40
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 50.72 6,254.00 3,171.74 3,171.74 3,082.26
-21,650.00 127,904.00 127,904.00 106,254.00 120.38Total Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)
32Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
33
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Sewer Fund160
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 157,748.00 83,162.47 83,162.47 74,585.53 52.72
3450 Investment Discount 483.00 273.14 273.14 209.86 56.55
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 52.73 158,231.00 83,435.61 83,435.61 74,795.39
3500 Intergovernmental/State
3550 CA Waste Oil Recycling Grant 5,400.00 0.00 0.00 5,400.00 0.00
Total Intergovernmental/State 0.00 5,400.00 0.00 0.00 5,400.00
3600 Intergovernmental/County
3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance 8,000.00 2,246.76 2,246.76 5,753.24 28.08
Total Intergovernmental/County 28.08 8,000.00 2,246.76 2,246.76 5,753.24
3800 Current Service Charges
3828 Sewer Connection Fee 55,000.00 20,058.00 20,058.00 34,942.00 36.47
3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 2,902.00 2,128.00 2,128.00 774.00 73.33
3832 Sewer Lateral Installation 22,548.00 15,086.00 15,086.00 7,462.00 66.91
Total Current Service Charges 46.33 80,450.00 37,272.00 37,272.00 43,178.00
3900 Other Revenue
3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3922 Other Financing Source- Debt Issuance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3955 Operating Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
33Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
34
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Sewer Fund160
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6800 Current Service Charges Continued
6861 Sewer Service Charge 1,050,155.00 631,485.64 631,485.64 418,669.36 60.13
Total Current Service Charges Continued 60.13 1,050,155.00 631,485.64 631,485.64 418,669.36
547,795.99 754,440.01 754,440.01 1,302,236.00 57.93Total Sewer Fund
34Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
35
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Storm Drains Fund161
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 23,654.00 0.00 0.00 23,654.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 23,654.00 0.00 0.00 23,654.00
3900 Other Revenue
3955 Operating Transfers In 700,000.00 466,664.00 466,664.00 233,336.00 66.67
Total Other Revenue 66.67 700,000.00 466,664.00 466,664.00 233,336.00
256,990.00 466,664.00 466,664.00 723,654.00 64.49Total Storm Drains Fund
35Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
36
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3300 Fines & Forfeitures
3304 State Forfeited Funds 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3307 Department of Justice Forfeited Funds 11,529.00 11,528.74 11,528.74 0.26 100.00
3308 Department of Treasury Forfeited Funds 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Fines & Forfeitures 100.00 11,529.00 11,528.74 11,528.74 0.26
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 13,931.00 7,269.03 7,269.03 6,661.97 52.18
3450 Investment Discount 21.00 24.25 24.25 -3.25 115.48
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 52.27 13,952.00 7,293.28 7,293.28 6,658.72
3900 Other Revenue
3903 Contributions Non Govt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6,658.98 18,822.02 18,822.02 25,481.00 73.87Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund
36Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
37
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Fire Protection Fund180
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 2,050.00 1,047.44 1,047.44 1,002.56 51.09
3450 Investment Discount 8.00 3.64 3.64 4.36 45.50
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 51.07 2,058.00 1,051.08 1,051.08 1,006.92
3900 Other Revenue
3912 Fire Flow Fee 48,751.00 13,258.50 13,258.50 35,492.50 27.20
Total Other Revenue 27.20 48,751.00 13,258.50 13,258.50 35,492.50
36,499.42 14,309.58 14,309.58 50,809.00 28.16Total Fire Protection Fund
37Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
38
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
RTI Undersea Cable190
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 8,832.00 4,589.77 4,589.77 4,242.23 51.97
3426 Easement Agreement 45,000.00 0.00 0.00 45,000.00 0.00
3450 Investment Discount 0.00 15.35 15.35 -15.35 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
49,226.88 4,605.12 4,605.12 53,832.00 8.55Total RTI Undersea Cable
38Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
39
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
RTI Tidelands191
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 6,424.00 3,337.98 3,337.98 3,086.02 51.96
3426 Easement Agreement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3450 Investment Discount 0.00 11.12 11.12 -11.12 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3,074.90 3,349.10 3,349.10 6,424.00 52.13Total RTI Tidelands
39Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
40
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
2015 Lease Revenue Bonds201
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3900 Other Revenue
3922 Other Financing Sources- Debt Issuance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3955 Operating Transfers In 632,432.00 632,431.79 632,431.79 0.21 100.00
0.21 632,431.79 632,431.79 632,432.00 100.00Total 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds
40Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
41
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 197,268.00 100,903.93 100,903.93 96,364.07 51.15
3414 Fund Exchange 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3450 Investment Discount 664.00 337.81 337.81 326.19 50.88
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 51.15 197,932.00 101,241.74 101,241.74 96,690.26
3900 Other Revenue
3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3913 In-Lieu Fee/Street Pavement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3955 Operating Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3962 SCE Reimbursement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
96,690.26 101,241.74 101,241.74 197,932.00 51.15Total Capital Improvement Fund
41Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
42
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Artesia Blvd Relinquishment302
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Total Artesia Blvd Relinquishment
42Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
43
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2609
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 2,933.00 1,337.91 1,337.91 1,595.09 45.62
1,595.09 1,337.91 1,337.91 2,933.00 45.62Total Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2
43Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
44
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund610
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 78.00 41.12 41.12 36.88 52.72
36.88 41.12 41.12 78.00 52.72Total Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund
44Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
45
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund611
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 1,504.00 674.71 674.71 829.29 44.86
829.29 674.71 674.71 1,504.00 44.86Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund
45Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
46
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund612
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 116.00 60.39 60.39 55.61 52.06
55.61 60.39 60.39 116.00 52.06Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund
46Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
47
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund617
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 2,031.00 666.05 666.05 1,364.95 32.79
1,364.95 666.05 666.05 2,031.00 32.79Total Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund
47Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
48
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Loma Drive Assessment Fund618
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 3,034.00 1,189.32 1,189.32 1,844.68 39.20
1,844.68 1,189.32 1,189.32 3,034.00 39.20Total Loma Drive Assessment Fund
48Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
49
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2619
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 381.00 198.25 198.25 182.75 52.03
182.75 198.25 198.25 381.00 52.03Total Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2
49Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
50
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Insurance Fund705
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3800 Current Service Charges
3880 Insurance Service Charges 2,610,232.00 1,740,168.00 1,740,168.00 870,064.00 66.67
Total Current Service Charges 66.67 2,610,232.00 1,740,168.00 1,740,168.00 870,064.00
3900 Other Revenue
3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3904 General Miscellaneous 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3955 Operating Transfers In 427,335.00 284,889.00 284,889.00 142,446.00 66.67
Total Other Revenue 66.67 427,335.00 284,889.00 284,889.00 142,446.00
1,012,510.00 2,025,057.00 2,025,057.00 3,037,567.00 66.67Total Insurance Fund
50Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
51
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3800 Current Service Charges
3822 Building Maintenance Service Charges 101,555.00 67,696.00 67,696.00 33,859.00 66.66
3885 Comm Equip/Business Mach Charges 698,486.00 465,656.00 465,656.00 232,830.00 66.67
3889 Vehicle/Equip Replacement Charges 818,135.00 545,423.36 545,423.36 272,711.64 66.67
Total Current Service Charges 66.67 1,618,176.00 1,078,775.36 1,078,775.36 539,400.64
3900 Other Revenue
3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 7,180.00 -7,786.03 -7,786.03 14,966.03 -108.44
3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3903 Contributions Non Govt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3904 General Miscellaneous 14,034.00 14,034.09 14,034.09 -0.09 100.00
3911 Gain on Sale of Fixed Assets 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3955 Operating Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3962 SCE Reimbursement 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00
Total Other Revenue 5.15 121,214.00 6,248.06 6,248.06 114,965.94
6800 Current Service Charges Continued
6866 Records Technology Fee 122,884.00 72,139.35 72,139.35 50,744.65 58.71
Total Current Service Charges Continued 58.71 122,884.00 72,139.35 72,139.35 50,744.65
705,111.23 1,157,162.77 1,157,162.77 1,862,274.00 62.14Total Equipment Replacement Fund
51Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
52
5:18PM
Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Investment Fund900
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 0.00 69,048.35 69,048.35 -69,048.35 0.00
-69,048.35 69,048.35 69,048.35 0.00 0.00Total Investment Fund
Grand Total 56,528,133.00 31,927,688.92 31,927,688.92 24,600,444.08 56.48
52Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
City Council1101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1101-4100 Personal Services
45,150.00 30,100.07 30,100.07 66.671101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 15,049.93
50.00 1,416.36 1,416.36 2,832.721101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -1,366.36
2,045.00 2,562.06 2,562.06 125.281101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -517.06
31,800.00 21,200.00 21,200.00 66.671101-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 10,600.00
21,451.00 12,432.68 12,432.68 57.961101-4180 Retirement 0.00 9,018.32
65.00 90.48 90.48 139.201101-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 -25.48
75,328.00 70,222.49 70,222.49 93.221101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 5,105.51
1,116.00 801.35 801.35 71.811101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 314.65
1,625.00 1,083.36 1,083.36 66.671101-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 541.64
Total Personal Services 178,630.00 139,908.85 139,908.85 0.00 38,721.15 78.32
1101-4200 Contract Services
47,000.00 15,446.38 15,446.38 32.861101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 31,553.62
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 0.00
Total Contract Services 47,000.00 15,446.38 15,446.38 0.00 31,553.62 32.86
1101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
6,000.00 214.75 214.75 3.581101-4304 Telephone 0.00 5,785.25
15,000.00 8,480.10 8,480.10 56.981101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 66.47 6,453.43
28,403.00 21,391.33 21,391.33 75.311101-4315 Membership 0.00 7,011.67
25,000.00 5,190.20 5,190.20 20.861101-4317 Conference/Training 25.00 19,784.80
50,520.00 51,134.84 51,134.84 103.121101-4319 Special Events 959.65 -1,574.49
3,620.00 2,416.00 2,416.00 66.741101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 1,204.00
4,834.00 3,224.00 3,224.00 66.691101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 1,610.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 133,377.00 92,051.22 92,051.22 1,051.12 40,274.66 69.80
1101-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
2
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
City Council1101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1101-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-5601 Buildings 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-5602 Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total City Council 359,007.00 247,406.45 247,406.45 1,051.12 110,549.43 69.21
2Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
3
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
City Clerk1121
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1121-4100 Personal Services
122,456.00 82,231.05 82,231.05 67.151121-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 40,224.95
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001121-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 0.00
6,449.00 0.00 0.00 0.001121-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 6,449.00
59,910.00 51,059.81 51,059.81 85.231121-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 8,850.19
26,349.00 16,331.40 16,331.40 61.981121-4180 Retirement 0.00 10,017.60
30,467.00 23,259.38 23,259.38 76.341121-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 7,207.62
2,647.00 1,933.88 1,933.88 73.061121-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 713.12
7,206.00 4,804.00 4,804.00 66.671121-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 2,402.00
Total Personal Services 255,484.00 179,619.52 179,619.52 0.00 75,864.48 70.31
1121-4200 Contract Services
35,750.00 2,011.50 2,011.50 5.631121-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 33,738.50
0.00 316.42 316.42 0.001121-4251 Contract Services/Govt 4.85 -321.27
Total Contract Services 35,750.00 2,327.92 2,327.92 4.85 33,417.23 6.53
1121-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
900.00 392.76 392.76 43.641121-4304 Telephone 0.00 507.24
4,300.00 1,762.06 1,762.06 40.981121-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 2,537.94
750.00 762.00 762.00 101.601121-4315 Membership 0.00 -12.00
7,200.00 1,767.85 1,767.85 24.551121-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 5,432.15
20,000.00 5,084.93 5,084.93 25.421121-4323 Public Noticing 0.00 14,915.07
7,257.00 4,840.00 4,840.00 66.691121-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 2,417.00
612.00 408.00 408.00 66.671121-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 204.00
12,543.00 8,360.00 8,360.00 66.651121-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 4,183.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 53,562.00 23,377.60 23,377.60 0.00 30,184.40 43.65
1121-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001121-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
City Clerk1121
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1121-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001121-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001121-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total City Clerk 344,796.00 205,325.04 205,325.04 4.85 139,466.11 59.55
4Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
5
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
City Attorney1131
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1131-4200 Contract Services
450,000.00 212,486.22 212,486.22 47.221131-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 237,513.78
Total City Attorney 450,000.00 212,486.22 212,486.22 0.00 237,513.78 47.22
5Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
6
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
City Prosecutor1132
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1132-4200 Contract Services
227,380.00 128,105.80 128,105.80 56.341132-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 99,274.20
Total Contract Services 227,380.00 128,105.80 128,105.80 0.00 99,274.20 56.34
1132-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
252.00 92.64 92.64 36.761132-4304 Telephone 0.00 159.36
100.00 0.00 0.00 0.001132-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 100.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001132-4315 Membership 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001132-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 0.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 352.00 92.64 92.64 0.00 259.36 26.32
Total City Prosecutor 227,732.00 128,198.44 128,198.44 0.00 99,533.56 56.29
6Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
7
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
City Attorney- Litigation1133
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1133-4200 Contract Services
130,000.00 24,350.30 24,350.30 18.731133-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 105,649.70
Total City Attorney- Litigation 130,000.00 24,350.30 24,350.30 0.00 105,649.70 18.73
7Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
8
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
City Treasurer1141
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1141-4100 Personal Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.00
6,360.00 4,240.00 4,240.00 66.671141-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 2,120.00
415.00 291.67 291.67 70.281141-4180 Retirement 0.00 123.33
12,802.00 8,333.30 8,333.30 65.091141-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 4,468.70
92.00 61.44 61.44 66.781141-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 30.56
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 0.00
Total Personal Services 19,669.00 12,926.41 12,926.41 0.00 6,742.59 65.72
1141-4200 Contract Services
14,000.00 7,508.58 7,508.58 53.631141-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 6,491.42
Total Contract Services 14,000.00 7,508.58 7,508.58 0.00 6,491.42 53.63
1141-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
500.00 268.08 268.08 53.621141-4304 Telephone 0.00 231.92
1,300.00 734.98 734.98 56.541141-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 565.02
105.00 65.00 65.00 61.901141-4315 Membership 0.00 40.00
2,405.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 2,405.00
3,762.00 2,504.00 2,504.00 66.561141-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 1,258.00
609.00 408.00 408.00 67.001141-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 201.00
450.00 304.00 304.00 67.561141-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 146.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 9,131.00 4,284.06 4,284.06 0.00 4,846.94 46.92
1141-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1141-5400 Equipment/Furniture
8Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
9
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
City Treasurer1141
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total City Treasurer 42,800.00 24,719.05 24,719.05 0.00 18,080.95 57.75
9Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
10
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
City Manager1201
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1201-4100 Personal Services
779,672.00 490,735.95 490,735.95 62.941201-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 288,936.05
100.00 1,416.36 1,416.36 1,416.361201-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -1,316.36
32,394.00 12,748.73 12,748.73 39.361201-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 19,645.27
12,480.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 12,480.00
69,973.00 41,848.50 41,848.50 59.811201-4180 Retirement 0.00 28,124.50
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 0.00
107,267.00 68,980.46 68,980.46 64.311201-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 38,286.54
11,858.00 7,594.45 7,594.45 64.041201-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 4,263.55
26,302.00 17,534.64 17,534.64 66.671201-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 8,767.36
Total Personal Services 1,040,046.00 640,859.09 640,859.09 0.00 399,186.91 61.62
1201-4200 Contract Services
539,749.00 282,886.68 282,886.68 53.001201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,184.46 253,677.86
16,340.00 3,502.00 3,502.00 26.911201-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 895.82 11,942.18
Total Contract Services 556,089.00 286,388.68 286,388.68 4,080.28 265,620.04 52.23
1201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
7,600.00 4,076.47 4,076.47 53.641201-4304 Telephone 0.00 3,523.53
10,500.00 3,964.04 3,964.04 40.311201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 268.30 6,267.66
6,492.00 3,667.00 3,667.00 56.481201-4315 Membership 0.00 2,825.00
27,537.00 9,290.10 9,290.10 33.741201-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 18,246.90
9,852.00 6,568.00 6,568.00 66.671201-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 3,284.00
3,406.00 2,272.00 2,272.00 66.711201-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 1,134.00
37,650.00 25,100.00 25,100.00 66.671201-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 12,550.00
53,687.00 35,792.00 35,792.00 66.671201-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 17,895.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 156,724.00 90,729.61 90,729.61 268.30 65,726.09 58.06
1201-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
11
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
City Manager1201
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1201-5400 Equipment/Furniture
13,296.00 12,095.56 12,095.56 90.971201-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 1,200.44
13,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 13,500.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 26,796.00 12,095.56 12,095.56 0.00 14,700.44 45.14
Total City Manager 1,779,655.00 1,030,072.94 1,030,072.94 4,348.58 745,233.48 58.12
11Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
12
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Finance Administration1202
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1202-4100 Personal Services
548,406.00 358,500.62 358,500.62 65.371202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 189,905.38
486.00 844.18 844.18 173.701202-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -358.18
46,939.00 36,613.02 36,613.02 78.001202-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 10,325.98
28,848.00 15,333.60 15,333.60 53.151202-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 13,514.40
141,659.00 78,222.40 78,222.40 55.221202-4180 Retirement 0.00 63,436.60
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001202-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 0.00
76,765.00 50,498.50 50,498.50 65.781202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 26,266.50
6,325.00 4,407.94 4,407.94 69.691202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 1,917.06
26,398.00 17,598.64 17,598.64 66.671202-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 8,799.36
Total Personal Services 875,826.00 562,018.90 562,018.90 0.00 313,807.10 64.17
1202-4200 Contract Services
133,064.00 71,208.81 71,208.81 53.891202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 505.00 61,350.19
Total Contract Services 133,064.00 71,208.81 71,208.81 505.00 61,350.19 53.89
1202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1,400.00 553.48 553.48 39.531202-4304 Telephone 0.00 846.52
7,020.00 4,165.92 4,165.92 59.701202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 25.00 2,829.08
690.00 690.00 690.00 115.941202-4315 Membership 110.00 -110.00
7,085.00 590.00 590.00 8.331202-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 6,495.00
20,986.00 13,992.00 13,992.00 66.671202-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 6,994.00
2,113.00 1,408.00 1,408.00 66.641202-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 705.00
33,049.00 22,032.00 22,032.00 66.661202-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 11,017.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 72,343.00 43,431.40 43,431.40 135.00 28,776.60 60.22
1202-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001202-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001202-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
12Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
13
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Finance Administration1202
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1202-5400 Equipment/Furniture
963.00 0.00 0.00 99.951202-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 962.51 0.49
Total Equipment/Furniture 963.00 0.00 0.00 962.51 0.49 99.95
Total Finance Administration 1,082,196.00 676,659.11 676,659.11 1,602.51 403,934.38 62.67
13Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
14
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Human Resources1203
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1203-4100 Personal Services
160,356.00 100,008.09 100,008.09 62.371203-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 60,347.91
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 0.00
5,171.00 724.92 724.92 14.021203-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 4,446.08
28,143.00 16,262.81 16,262.81 57.791203-4180 Retirement 0.00 11,880.19
124,305.00 88,706.38 88,706.38 71.361203-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 35,598.62
2,534.00 1,600.54 1,600.54 63.161203-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 933.46
7,052.00 4,701.36 4,701.36 66.671203-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 2,350.64
2,000.00 1,116.17 1,116.17 55.811203-4191 Instant Bonuses 0.00 883.83
Total Personal Services 329,561.00 213,120.27 213,120.27 0.00 116,440.73 64.67
1203-4200 Contract Services
347,793.00 100,138.74 100,138.74 29.961203-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4,073.59 243,580.67
11,000.00 1,442.00 1,442.00 13.111203-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 9,558.00
Total Contract Services 358,793.00 101,580.74 101,580.74 4,073.59 253,138.67 29.45
1203-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-4300 Employee recognition instant bonus 0.00 0.00
1,900.00 859.56 859.56 45.241203-4304 Telephone 0.00 1,040.44
4,000.00 1,837.89 1,837.89 46.961203-4305 Office Oper Supplies 40.52 2,121.59
1,450.00 149.00 149.00 10.281203-4315 Membership 0.00 1,301.00
23,350.00 10,838.33 10,838.33 92.061203-4317 Conference/Training 10,658.46 1,853.21
12,000.00 8,847.00 8,847.00 73.731203-4320 Medical Exams 0.00 3,153.00
6,752.00 4,504.00 4,504.00 66.711203-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 2,248.00
612.00 408.00 408.00 66.671203-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 204.00
14,413.00 9,608.00 9,608.00 66.661203-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 4,805.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 64,477.00 37,051.78 37,051.78 10,698.98 16,726.24 74.06
1203-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
14Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
15
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Human Resources1203
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1203-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Human Resources 752,831.00 351,752.79 351,752.79 14,772.57 386,305.64 48.69
15Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
16
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Finance Cashier1204
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1204-4100 Personal Services
359,088.00 208,138.27 208,138.27 57.961204-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 150,949.73
1,500.00 10.89 10.89 0.731204-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 1,489.11
6,006.00 6,116.76 6,116.76 101.841204-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -110.76
40,438.00 31,372.67 31,372.67 77.581204-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 9,065.33
40,308.00 31,532.85 31,532.85 78.231204-4180 Retirement 0.00 8,775.15
10.00 8.52 8.52 85.201204-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 1.48
93,815.00 58,125.39 58,125.39 61.961204-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 35,689.61
4,135.00 3,301.35 3,301.35 79.841204-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 833.65
25,688.00 17,125.36 17,125.36 66.671204-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 8,562.64
Total Personal Services 570,988.00 355,732.06 355,732.06 0.00 215,255.94 62.30
1204-4200 Contract Services
165,914.00 71,102.99 71,102.99 42.861204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 94,811.01
2,000.00 624.00 624.00 31.201204-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 1,376.00
Total Contract Services 167,914.00 71,726.99 71,726.99 0.00 96,187.01 42.72
1204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
2,690.00 1,366.79 1,366.79 50.811204-4304 Telephone 0.00 1,323.21
48,005.00 28,326.37 28,326.37 60.721204-4305 Office Operating Supplies 820.82 18,857.81
235.00 235.00 235.00 100.001204-4315 Membership 0.00 0.00
4,266.00 2,309.72 2,309.72 54.141204-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 1,956.28
24,158.00 16,104.00 16,104.00 66.661204-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 8,054.00
1,828.00 1,216.00 1,216.00 66.521204-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 612.00
23,116.00 15,408.00 15,408.00 66.661204-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 7,708.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 104,298.00 64,965.88 64,965.88 820.82 38,511.30 63.08
1204-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
16Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
17
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Total Finance Cashier 843,200.00 492,424.93 492,424.93 820.82 349,954.25 58.50
General Appropriations1208
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1208-4100 Personal Services
65,616.00 16,037.69 16,037.69 24.441208-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 49,578.31
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 0.00
380.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 380.00
4,537.00 1,182.70 1,182.70 26.071208-4180 Retirement 0.00 3,354.30
18,431.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 18,431.00
951.00 232.56 232.56 24.451208-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 718.44
5,774.00 3,849.36 3,849.36 66.671208-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 1,924.64
Total Personal Services 95,689.00 21,302.31 21,302.31 0.00 74,386.69 22.26
1208-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1208-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
140.00 34.35 34.35 24.541208-4304 Telephone 0.00 105.65
-10,000.00 -3,513.22 -3,513.22 20.971208-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1,416.13 -7,902.91
18,396.00 12,264.00 12,264.00 66.671208-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 6,132.00
306.00 200.00 200.00 65.361208-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 106.00
2,036.00 1,360.00 1,360.00 66.801208-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 676.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 10,878.00 10,345.13 10,345.13 1,416.13 -883.26 108.12
1208-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total General Appropriations 106,567.00 31,647.44 31,647.44 1,416.13 73,503.43 31.03
17Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
18
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Prospective Expenditures1214
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1214-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
169,984.00 0.00 0.00 0.001214-4322 Unclassified 0.00 169,984.00
Total Prospective Expenditures 169,984.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 169,984.00 0.00
18Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
19
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Legal Settlement- E&B Resources1220
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1220-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001220-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Legal Settlement- E&B Resources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
20
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Interfund Transfers Out1299
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1,759,767.00 1,383,984.79 1,383,984.79 78.651299-4399 OperatingTransfers Out 0.00 375,782.21
Total Interfund Transfers Out 1,759,767.00 1,383,984.79 1,383,984.79 0.00 375,782.21 78.65
20Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
21
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Police2101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2101-4100 Personal Services
5,069,227.00 3,058,189.11 3,058,189.11 60.332101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 2,011,037.89
80,793.00 54,547.96 54,547.96 67.522101-4105 Special Duty Pay 0.00 26,245.04
360,000.00 212,748.87 212,748.87 59.102101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 147,251.13
871,159.00 509,115.97 509,115.97 58.442101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 362,043.03
18,252.00 3,144.84 3,144.84 17.232101-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 15,107.16
6,000.00 4,070.09 4,070.09 67.832101-4117 Shift Differential 0.00 1,929.91
9,000.00 426.00 426.00 4.732101-4118 Training Officer 0.00 8,574.00
3,645,645.00 2,078,251.43 2,078,251.43 57.012101-4180 Retirement 0.00 1,567,393.57
17,000.00 11,972.52 11,972.52 70.432101-4184 IRC 415(B) Retirement 0.00 5,027.48
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 0.00
28,922.00 19,989.40 19,989.40 69.112101-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 8,932.60
887,617.00 575,563.13 575,563.13 64.842101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 312,053.87
74,527.00 56,976.46 56,976.46 76.452101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 17,550.54
446,236.00 297,490.64 297,490.64 66.672101-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 148,745.36
Total Personal Services 11,514,378.00 6,882,486.42 6,882,486.42 0.00 4,631,891.58 59.77
2101-4200 Contract Services
228,208.00 140,775.58 140,775.58 62.022101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 768.00 86,664.42
859,785.00 593,299.50 593,299.50 69.012101-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 266,485.50
Total Contract Services 1,087,993.00 734,075.08 734,075.08 768.00 353,149.92 67.54
2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
56,760.00 28,543.91 28,543.91 50.292101-4304 Telephone 0.00 28,216.09
55,000.00 15,857.87 15,857.87 35.812101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 3,835.19 35,306.94
13,000.00 6,388.40 6,388.40 54.282101-4306 Prisoner Maintenance 667.89 5,943.71
775.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4307 Radio Maintenance 0.00 775.00
10,500.00 762.84 762.84 7.272101-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 9,737.16
22,365.00 3,661.12 3,661.12 17.462101-4312 Travel Expense , POST 244.00 18,459.88
4,620.00 385.98 385.98 8.352101-4313 Travel Expense, STC 0.00 4,234.02
19,500.00 6,846.42 6,846.42 52.822101-4314 Uniforms 3,453.51 9,200.07
21Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
22
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Police2101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4,579.00 2,870.00 2,870.00 62.682101-4315 Membership 0.00 1,709.00
67,145.00 25,884.52 25,884.52 40.722101-4317 Conference/Training 1,454.07 39,806.41
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4326 Prior Yr Expense 0.00 0.00
4,524.00 1,888.01 1,888.01 101.282101-4350 Safety Gear 2,693.71 -57.72
360,146.00 240,096.00 240,096.00 66.672101-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 120,050.00
11,250.00 7,504.00 7,504.00 66.702101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 3,746.00
391,640.00 261,093.36 261,093.36 66.672101-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 130,546.64
1,300,118.00 866,744.00 866,744.00 66.672101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 433,374.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,321,922.00 1,468,526.43 1,468,526.43 12,348.37 841,047.20 63.78
2101-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4904 Depreciation/Improvements 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2101-5400 Equipment/Furniture
3,075.00 3,074.76 3,074.76 99.992101-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.24
4,140.00 5,343.50 5,343.50 129.072101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 -1,203.50
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 7,215.00 8,418.26 8,418.26 0.00 -1,203.26 116.68
2101-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-5601 Buildings 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-5602 Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Police 14,931,508.00 9,093,506.19 9,093,506.19 13,116.37 5,824,885.44 60.99
22Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
23
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Crossing Guard2102
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2102-4200 Contract Services
115,085.00 60,620.80 60,620.80 52.672102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 54,464.20
Total Crossing Guard 115,085.00 60,620.80 60,620.80 0.00 54,464.20 52.67
23Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
24
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Fire2201
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2201-4100 Personal Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4108 FLSA Overtime 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4119 Fitness Incentive 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4180 Retirement 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 0.00
Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2201-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 0.00
Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 352.63 352.63 0.002201-4304 Telephone 0.00 -352.63
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4314 Uniforms 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4315 Membership 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4326 Prior Yr Expense 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4350 Safety Gear 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00
24Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
25
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Fire2201
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 352.63 352.63 0.00 -352.63 0.00
2201-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4904 Depreciation/Improvements 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2201-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2201-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-5602 Improvements Other Than Bldgs 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Fire 0.00 352.63 352.63 0.00 -352.63 0.00
25Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
26
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
County Fire District Costs2202
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2202-4100 Personal Services
0.00 31,888.80 31,888.80 0.002202-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -31,888.80
Total Personal Services 0.00 31,888.80 31,888.80 0.00 -31,888.80 0.00
2202-4200 Contract Services
4,757,911.00 3,561,918.27 3,561,918.27 74.862202-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 1,195,992.73
Total Contract Services 4,757,911.00 3,561,918.27 3,561,918.27 0.00 1,195,992.73 74.86
2202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002202-4303 Utilities 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002202-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 0.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2202-5600 Buildings/Improvements
181,836.00 113,647.50 113,647.50 62.502202-5601 Buildings and Improvements 0.00 68,188.50
Total Buildings/Improvements 181,836.00 113,647.50 113,647.50 0.00 68,188.50 62.50
Total County Fire District Costs 4,939,747.00 3,707,454.57 3,707,454.57 0.00 1,232,292.43 75.05
26Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
27
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Fire Department Legacy Costs2203
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2203-4100 Personal Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002203-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 0.00
612,000.00 590,425.00 590,425.00 96.472203-4180 Retirement 0.00 21,575.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002203-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002203-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 0.00
130,974.00 87,316.00 87,316.00 66.672203-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits/OPEB 0.00 43,658.00
Total Personal Services 742,974.00 677,741.00 677,741.00 0.00 65,233.00 91.22
2203-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002203-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Fire Department Legacy Costs 742,974.00 677,741.00 677,741.00 0.00 65,233.00 91.22
27Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
28
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Sewers/Storm Drains3102
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3102-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
Total Sewers/Storm Drains 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
28Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
29
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Street Maint/Traffic Safety3104
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3104-4100 Personal Services
307,738.00 205,964.32 205,964.32 66.933104-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 101,773.68
16,651.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 16,651.00
20,713.00 34,743.51 34,743.51 167.743104-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -14,030.51
44,013.00 8,688.72 8,688.72 19.743104-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 35,324.28
114,389.00 61,673.10 61,673.10 53.923104-4180 Retirement 0.00 52,715.90
58,809.00 36,034.47 36,034.47 61.273104-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 22,774.53
2,174.00 1,443.95 1,443.95 66.423104-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 730.05
22,221.00 14,814.00 14,814.00 66.673104-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 7,407.00
Total Personal Services 586,708.00 363,362.07 363,362.07 0.00 223,345.93 61.93
3104-4200 Contract Services
381,423.00 140,503.98 140,503.98 36.843104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 240,919.02
10,294.00 4,282.54 4,282.54 41.603104-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 6,011.46
Total Contract Services 391,717.00 144,786.52 144,786.52 0.00 246,930.48 36.96
3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
6,066.00 4,796.78 4,796.78 79.083104-4303 Utilities 0.00 1,269.22
115,000.00 40,657.81 40,657.81 40.193104-4309 Maintenance Materials 5,557.16 68,785.03
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4326 Prior Yr Expense 0.00 0.00
666.00 440.00 440.00 66.073104-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 226.00
55,595.00 37,063.36 37,063.36 66.673104-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 18,531.64
425,162.00 283,440.00 283,440.00 66.673104-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 141,722.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 602,489.00 366,397.95 366,397.95 5,557.16 230,533.89 61.74
3104-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
29Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
30
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Total Street Maint/Traffic Safety 1,580,914.00 874,546.54 874,546.54 5,557.16 700,810.30 55.67
Downtown Enhancement3301
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3301-4100 Personal Services
40,387.00 26,656.16 26,656.16 66.003301-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 13,730.84
1,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 1,200.00
4,773.00 6,169.69 6,169.69 129.263301-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -1,396.69
13,338.00 7,266.35 7,266.35 54.483301-4180 Retirement 0.00 6,071.65
7,009.00 4,306.37 4,306.37 61.443301-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 2,702.63
705.00 490.72 490.72 69.613301-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 214.28
1,661.00 1,107.36 1,107.36 66.673301-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits/OPEB 0.00 553.64
Total Personal Services 69,073.00 45,996.65 45,996.65 0.00 23,076.35 66.59
3301-4200 Contract Services
267,170.00 120,523.49 120,523.49 45.113301-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 146,646.51
Total Contract Services 267,170.00 120,523.49 120,523.49 0.00 146,646.51 45.11
3301-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-4303 Utilities 0.00 0.00
3,000.00 1,999.30 1,999.30 66.643301-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 1,000.70
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-4319 Special Events 0.00 0.00
221.00 144.00 144.00 65.163301-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 77.00
557.00 371.36 371.36 66.673301-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 185.64
5,940.00 3,960.00 3,960.00 66.673301-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 1,980.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 9,718.00 6,474.66 6,474.66 0.00 3,243.34 66.63
3301-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3301-5400 Equipment/Furniture
30Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
31
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Downtown Enhancement3301
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Downtown Enhancement 345,961.00 172,994.80 172,994.80 0.00 172,966.20 50.00
31Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
32
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Community Services3302
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3302-4100 Personal Services
1,029,655.00 570,961.56 570,961.56 55.453302-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 458,693.44
40,800.00 31,876.65 31,876.65 78.133302-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 8,923.35
47,044.00 48,623.50 48,623.50 103.363302-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -1,579.50
42,890.00 62,531.77 62,531.77 145.803302-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 -19,641.77
7,525.00 3,328.96 3,328.96 44.243302-4117 Shift Differential 0.00 4,196.04
602.00 700.00 700.00 116.283302-4118 Field Training Officer 0.00 -98.00
285,240.00 146,359.10 146,359.10 51.313302-4180 Retirement 0.00 138,880.90
380.00 41.94 41.94 11.043302-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 338.06
4,800.00 3,155.37 3,155.37 65.743302-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 1,644.63
264,289.00 171,053.61 171,053.61 64.723302-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 93,235.39
15,307.00 10,460.03 10,460.03 68.333302-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 4,846.97
81,109.00 54,072.64 54,072.64 66.673302-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 27,036.36
Total Personal Services 1,819,641.00 1,103,165.13 1,103,165.13 0.00 716,475.87 60.63
3302-4200 Contract Services
233,824.00 128,843.24 128,843.24 55.883302-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,806.43 103,174.33
83,969.00 62,133.26 62,133.26 74.003302-4251 Contract Services/Govt 0.00 21,835.74
Total Contract Services 317,793.00 190,976.50 190,976.50 1,806.43 125,010.07 60.66
3302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
3,500.00 1,883.39 1,883.39 53.813302-4304 Telephone 0.00 1,616.61
20,000.00 2,198.49 2,198.49 10.993302-4305 Office Operating Supplies 0.00 17,801.51
775.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4307 Radio Maintenance 0.00 775.00
33,372.00 12,106.43 12,106.43 51.053302-4309 Maintenance Materials 4,929.60 16,335.97
3,000.00 1,017.20 1,017.20 33.913302-4314 Uniforms 0.00 1,982.80
540.00 285.00 285.00 52.783302-4315 Membership 0.00 255.00
7,865.00 2,184.24 2,184.24 27.773302-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 5,680.76
101,235.00 67,488.00 67,488.00 66.663302-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 33,747.00
7,088.00 4,728.00 4,728.00 66.703302-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 2,360.00
110,061.00 73,374.00 73,374.00 66.673302-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 36,687.00
32Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
33
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Community Services3302
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
153,515.00 102,344.00 102,344.00 66.673302-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 51,171.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 440,951.00 267,608.75 267,608.75 4,929.60 168,412.65 61.81
3302-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3302-5400 Equipment/Furniture
2,575.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 2,575.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 2,575.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,575.00 0.00
3302-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-5601 Buildings 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Community Services 2,580,960.00 1,561,750.38 1,561,750.38 6,736.03 1,012,473.59 60.77
33Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
34
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
North Pier Parking Structure3304
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3304-4200 Contract Services
140,946.00 45,812.21 45,812.21 32.503304-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 95,133.79
225.00 0.00 0.00 0.003304-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 225.00
Total Contract Services 141,171.00 45,812.21 45,812.21 0.00 95,358.79 32.45
3304-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
17,837.00 12,142.73 12,142.73 68.083304-4303 Utilities 0.00 5,694.27
689.00 456.97 456.97 66.323304-4304 Telephone 0.00 232.03
4,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.003304-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 4,500.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 23,026.00 12,599.70 12,599.70 0.00 10,426.30 54.72
3304-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003304-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total North Pier Parking Structure 164,197.00 58,411.91 58,411.91 0.00 105,785.09 35.57
34Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
35
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Downtown Parking Lot A3305
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3305-4200 Contract Services
61,443.00 25,567.44 25,567.44 41.613305-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 35,875.56
Total Contract Services 61,443.00 25,567.44 25,567.44 0.00 35,875.56 41.61
3305-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003305-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 2,000.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00
3305-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003305-4904 Depreciation/Improvements 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Downtown Parking Lot A 63,443.00 25,567.44 25,567.44 0.00 37,875.56 40.30
35Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
36
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Co. Share Pkg Structure Rev.3306
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3306-4200 Contract Services
329,845.00 0.00 0.00 0.003306-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 329,845.00
Total Co. Share Pkg Structure Rev. 329,845.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 329,845.00 0.00
36Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
37
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
After School Program Shuttle3411
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3411-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003411-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total After School Program Shuttle 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
37Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
38
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Community Dev/Planning4101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4101-4100 Personal Services
643,087.00 397,357.50 397,357.50 61.794101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 245,729.50
674.00 334.78 334.78 49.674101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 339.22
30,174.00 9,956.00 9,956.00 33.004101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 20,218.00
92,219.00 38,527.77 38,527.77 41.784101-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 53,691.23
0.00 340.16 340.16 0.004101-4117 Shift Differential 0.00 -340.16
105,813.00 53,170.59 53,170.59 50.254101-4180 Retirement 0.00 52,642.41
0.00 87.66 87.66 0.004101-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 -87.66
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004101-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 0.00
104,241.00 66,370.11 66,370.11 63.674101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 37,870.89
10,572.00 6,598.98 6,598.98 62.424101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 3,973.02
30,346.00 20,230.64 20,230.64 66.674101-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 10,115.36
Total Personal Services 1,017,126.00 592,974.19 592,974.19 0.00 424,151.81 58.30
4101-4200 Contract Services
47,090.00 1,079.85 1,079.85 2.404101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 50.00 45,960.15
Total Contract Services 47,090.00 1,079.85 1,079.85 50.00 45,960.15 2.40
4101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
3,000.00 674.44 674.44 22.484101-4304 Telephone 0.00 2,325.56
5,000.00 2,874.77 2,874.77 57.504101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 2,125.23
241.00 0.00 0.00 0.004101-4314 Uniforms 0.00 241.00
4,408.00 252.00 252.00 5.724101-4315 Membership 0.00 4,156.00
13,307.00 4,813.63 4,813.63 36.174101-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 8,493.37
13,636.00 9,088.00 9,088.00 66.654101-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 4,548.00
2,234.00 1,488.00 1,488.00 66.614101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 746.00
43,240.00 28,824.00 28,824.00 66.664101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 14,416.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 85,066.00 48,014.84 48,014.84 0.00 37,051.16 56.44
Total Community Dev/Planning 1,149,282.00 642,068.88 642,068.88 50.00 507,163.12 55.87
38Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
39
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Coastal Permit Auth Grant4104
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4104-4100 Personal Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004104-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 0.00
Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4104-4200 Contract Services
62,576.00 5,319.47 5,319.47 8.504104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 57,256.53
Total Contract Services 62,576.00 5,319.47 5,319.47 0.00 57,256.53 8.50
4104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004104-4305 Office Operating Supplies 0.00 0.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Coastal Permit Auth Grant 62,576.00 5,319.47 5,319.47 0.00 57,256.53 8.50
39Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
40
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Zoning Ordinance Update4105
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4105-4200 Contract Services
250,000.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 0.964105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 247,600.00
Total Zoning Ordinance Update 250,000.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 0.00 247,600.00 0.96
40Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
41
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Community Dev/Building4201
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4201-4100 Personal Services
485,622.00 308,671.34 308,671.34 63.564201-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 176,950.66
434.00 334.77 334.77 77.144201-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 99.23
20,420.00 12,740.85 12,740.85 62.394201-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 7,679.15
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 0.00
0.00 340.16 340.16 0.004201-4117 Shift Differential 0.00 -340.16
164,409.00 72,729.46 72,729.46 44.244201-4180 Retirement 0.00 91,679.54
0.00 87.66 87.66 0.004201-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 -87.66
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 0.00
71,755.00 40,885.48 40,885.48 56.984201-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 30,869.52
7,187.00 4,773.95 4,773.95 66.424201-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 2,413.05
30,675.00 20,450.00 20,450.00 66.674201-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 10,225.00
Total Personal Services 780,502.00 461,013.67 461,013.67 0.00 319,488.33 59.07
4201-4200 Contract Services
251,068.00 84,096.75 84,096.75 33.504201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 166,971.25
Total Contract Services 251,068.00 84,096.75 84,096.75 0.00 166,971.25 33.50
4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
5,500.00 2,843.25 2,843.25 51.704201-4304 Telephone 0.00 2,656.75
5,000.00 2,328.21 2,328.21 66.424201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 992.73 1,679.06
1,246.00 413.24 413.24 33.174201-4314 Uniforms 0.00 832.76
5,290.00 795.00 795.00 15.034201-4315 Membership 0.00 4,495.00
10,336.00 4,929.86 4,929.86 47.704201-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 5,406.14
18,432.00 12,288.00 12,288.00 66.674201-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 6,144.00
1,409.00 936.00 936.00 66.434201-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 473.00
24,774.00 16,516.00 16,516.00 66.674201-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 8,258.00
54,211.00 36,144.00 36,144.00 66.674201-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 18,067.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 126,198.00 77,193.56 77,193.56 992.73 48,011.71 61.96
4201-4900 Depreciation
41Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
42
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Community Dev/Building4201
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4904 Depreciation/Improvements 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4201-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-5602 Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Community Dev/Building 1,157,768.00 622,303.98 622,303.98 992.73 534,471.29 53.84
42Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
43
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Public Works Administration4202
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4202-4100 Personal Services
598,746.00 322,609.85 322,609.85 53.884202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 276,136.15
2,000.00 727.17 727.17 36.364202-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 1,272.83
21,417.00 8,911.30 8,911.30 41.614202-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 12,505.70
24,480.00 78,004.22 78,004.22 318.644202-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -53,524.22
148,108.00 79,971.50 79,971.50 54.004202-4180 Retirement 0.00 68,136.50
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 0.00
100,698.00 52,277.29 52,277.29 51.914202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 48,420.71
9,771.00 6,197.27 6,197.27 63.434202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 3,573.73
26,442.00 17,628.00 17,628.00 66.674202-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 8,814.00
Total Personal Services 931,662.00 566,326.60 566,326.60 0.00 365,335.40 60.79
4202-4200 Contract Services
112,929.00 34,259.90 34,259.90 30.784202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 500.00 78,169.10
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 0.00
Total Contract Services 112,929.00 34,259.90 34,259.90 500.00 78,169.10 30.78
4202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
19,980.00 8,011.52 8,011.52 40.104202-4304 Telephone 0.00 11,968.48
14,998.00 6,778.97 6,778.97 53.414202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1,231.09 6,987.94
6,678.00 5,911.45 5,911.45 89.144202-4314 Uniforms 41.04 725.51
1,775.00 1,443.75 1,443.75 81.344202-4315 Membership 0.00 331.25
24,807.00 9,148.49 9,148.49 36.884202-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 15,658.51
74,882.00 49,920.00 49,920.00 66.664202-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 24,962.00
6,478.00 4,320.00 4,320.00 66.694202-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 2,158.00
17,100.00 11,400.00 11,400.00 66.674202-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 5,700.00
64,163.00 42,776.00 42,776.00 66.674202-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 21,387.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 230,861.00 139,710.18 139,710.18 1,272.13 89,878.69 61.07
4202-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
43Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
44
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Public Works Administration4202
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4904 Depreciation/Improvements 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4202-5400 Equipment/Furniture
850.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 850.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 850.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 850.00 0.00
4202-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-5602 Imprvmts Other Than Bldg 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Public Works Administration 1,276,302.00 740,296.68 740,296.68 1,772.13 534,233.19 58.14
44Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
45
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Building Maintenance4204
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4204-4100 Personal Services
269,717.00 158,741.82 158,741.82 58.854204-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 110,975.18
14,575.00 14,237.65 14,237.65 97.694204-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 337.35
22,070.00 15,688.06 15,688.06 71.084204-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 6,381.94
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 0.00
82,103.00 39,100.00 39,100.00 47.624204-4180 Retirement 0.00 43,003.00
0.00 78.54 78.54 0.004204-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 -78.54
61,617.00 34,538.36 34,538.36 56.054204-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 27,078.64
3,861.00 2,657.15 2,657.15 68.824204-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 1,203.85
17,490.00 11,660.00 11,660.00 66.674204-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 5,830.00
Total Personal Services 471,433.00 276,701.58 276,701.58 0.00 194,731.42 58.69
4204-4200 Contract Services
139,544.00 85,378.48 85,378.48 61.184204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 54,165.52
225.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 225.00
Total Contract Services 139,769.00 85,378.48 85,378.48 0.00 54,390.52 61.09
4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
142,755.00 76,269.45 76,269.45 53.434204-4303 Utilities 0.00 66,485.55
43,500.00 35,400.18 35,400.18 81.774204-4309 Maintenance Materials 168.62 7,931.20
6,000.00 2,182.62 2,182.62 36.384204-4321 Building Sfty/Security 0.00 3,817.38
5,444.00 3,632.00 3,632.00 66.724204-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 1,812.00
667.00 448.00 448.00 67.174204-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 219.00
15,071.00 10,047.36 10,047.36 66.674204-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 5,023.64
81,237.00 54,160.00 54,160.00 66.674204-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 27,077.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 294,674.00 182,139.61 182,139.61 168.62 112,365.77 61.87
4204-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
45Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
46
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Building Maintenance4204
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4204-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4204-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5601 Buildings 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5602 Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Building Maintenance 905,876.00 544,219.67 544,219.67 168.62 361,487.71 60.10
46Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
47
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program4210
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4210-4200 Contract Services
9,350.00 0.00 0.00 0.004210-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 9,350.00
Total Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program 9,350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,350.00 0.00
47Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
48
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Community Resources4601
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4601-4100 Personal Services
332,642.00 209,583.90 209,583.90 63.014601-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 123,058.10
5,007.00 5,296.84 5,296.84 105.794601-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -289.84
9,209.00 765.94 765.94 8.324601-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 8,443.06
310,294.00 204,607.29 204,607.29 65.944601-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 105,686.71
105,564.00 83,282.29 83,282.29 78.894601-4180 Retirement 0.00 22,281.71
1,300.00 1,405.20 1,405.20 108.094601-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 -105.20
48,989.00 39,080.50 39,080.50 79.774601-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 9,908.50
5,106.00 6,971.76 6,971.76 136.544601-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 -1,865.76
16,353.00 10,902.00 10,902.00 66.674601-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 5,451.00
Total Personal Services 834,464.00 561,895.72 561,895.72 0.00 272,568.28 67.34
4601-4200 Contract Services
92,000.00 72,158.51 72,158.51 84.314601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 5,408.67 14,432.82
285,000.00 177,152.22 177,152.22 69.204601-4221 Contract Rec Classes/Programs 20,077.50 87,770.28
Total Contract Services 377,000.00 249,310.73 249,310.73 25,486.17 102,203.10 72.89
4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
16,800.00 3,225.87 3,225.87 19.204601-4302 Advertising 0.00 13,574.13
5,000.00 2,063.16 2,063.16 41.264601-4304 Telephone 0.00 2,936.84
13,000.00 7,640.03 7,640.03 65.674601-4305 Office Oper Supplies 897.31 4,462.66
20,000.00 7,190.28 7,190.28 37.964601-4308 Program Materials 402.40 12,407.32
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 0.00
2,850.00 2,592.22 2,592.22 90.964601-4315 Membership 0.00 257.78
15,000.00 4,378.31 4,378.31 29.384601-4317 Conference/Training 27.98 10,593.71
6,000.00 2,730.67 2,730.67 47.034601-4328 Hermosa Senior Center Programs 91.00 3,178.33
33,551.00 22,368.00 22,368.00 66.674601-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 11,183.00
35,237.00 23,488.00 23,488.00 66.664601-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 11,749.00
19,740.00 13,160.00 13,160.00 66.674601-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 6,580.00
56,120.00 37,416.00 37,416.00 66.674601-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 18,704.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 223,298.00 126,252.54 126,252.54 1,418.69 95,626.77 57.18
48Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
49
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Community Resources4601
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4601-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4904 Depreciation/Improvements 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4601-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 611.11 -611.11
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 611.11 -611.11 0.00
4601-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-5601 Buildings 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-5602 Imprvmts Other Than Bldg 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Community Resources 1,434,762.00 937,458.99 937,458.99 27,515.97 469,787.04 67.26
49Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
50
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Parks6101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
6101-4100 Personal Services
315,476.00 206,755.10 206,755.10 65.546101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 108,720.90
4,500.00 3,243.35 3,243.35 72.076101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 1,256.65
17,188.00 16,099.02 16,099.02 93.666101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 1,088.98
58,235.00 33,669.43 33,669.43 57.826101-4180 Retirement 0.00 24,565.57
480.00 320.00 320.00 66.676101-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 160.00
70,726.00 52,023.11 52,023.11 73.566101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 18,702.89
4,699.00 3,325.26 3,325.26 70.776101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 1,373.74
22,986.00 15,324.00 15,324.00 66.676101-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 7,662.00
Total Personal Services 494,290.00 330,759.27 330,759.27 0.00 163,530.73 66.92
6101-4200 Contract Services
260,512.00 144,523.20 144,523.20 55.486101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 115,988.80
198.00 222.00 222.00 112.126101-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 -24.00
Total Contract Services 260,710.00 144,745.20 144,745.20 0.00 115,964.80 55.52
6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
263,108.00 172,822.73 172,822.73 65.696101-4303 Utilities 0.00 90,285.27
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4304 Telephone 0.00 0.00
25,938.00 23,977.18 23,977.18 92.446101-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 1,960.82
21,867.00 14,576.00 14,576.00 66.666101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 7,291.00
28,633.00 19,088.64 19,088.64 66.676101-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 9,544.36
109,542.00 73,032.00 73,032.00 66.676101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 36,510.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 449,088.00 303,496.55 303,496.55 0.00 145,591.45 67.58
6101-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6101-5400 Equipment/Furniture
50Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
51
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Parks6101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 715.90 715.90 0.006101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 -715.90
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-5499 Non-Capitalized Assets 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 715.90 715.90 0.00 -715.90 0.00
6101-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-5602 Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Parks 1,204,088.00 779,716.92 779,716.92 0.00 424,371.08 64.76
51Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
52
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Community Choice Aggregation7301
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
7301-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007301-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Community Choice Aggregation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
52Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
53
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8143-4200 Contract Services
94,454.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 94,454.00
Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 94,454.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94,454.00 0.00
53Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
54
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Protective Bollards Along the Strand8163
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8163-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008163-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Protective Bollards Along the Strand 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
54Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
55
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Valley Drive Sharrows8168
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8168-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008168-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Valley Drive Sharrows 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
55Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
56
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
8th Street Improvements8173
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8173-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total 8th Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
56Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
57
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Street Improvements- Various Locations8174
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8174-4100 Personal Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008174-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008174-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008174-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008174-4180 Retirement 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008174-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 0.00
Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8174-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Street Improvements- Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
57Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
58
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Street Improvement Various Locations8186
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8186-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Street Improvement Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
58Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
59
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
South Park Phase I Improvements8537
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8537-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008537-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total South Park Phase I Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
59Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
60
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Citywide Park Master Plan8538
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8538-4200 Contract Services
42,065.00 0.00 0.00 0.008538-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 42,065.00
Total Citywide Park Master Plan 42,065.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42,065.00 0.00
60Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
61
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
South Park Phase II8540
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8540-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008540-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total South Park Phase II 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
61Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
62
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Fire Station Renovation & Upgrades8606
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8606-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008606-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Fire Station Renovation & Upgrades 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
62Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
63
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation8609
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8609-4200 Contract Services
103,610.00 0.00 0.00 15.708609-4201 Contract Serv/Private 16,264.83 87,345.17
Total Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation 103,610.00 0.00 0.00 16,264.83 87,345.17 15.70
63Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
64
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Police Facilities Impovements8614
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8614-4200 Contract Services
2,972.00 2,880.30 2,880.30 96.918614-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 91.70
Total Police Facilities Impovements 2,972.00 2,880.30 2,880.30 0.00 91.70 96.91
64Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
65
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
New Corporate Yard Facility8615
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8615-4200 Contract Services
56,102.00 4,106.25 4,106.25 7.328615-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 51,995.75
Total New Corporate Yard Facility 56,102.00 4,106.25 4,106.25 0.00 51,995.75 7.32
65Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
66
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Fire Department Tower Demolition8632
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8632-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008632-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Fire Department Tower Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
66Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
67
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Municipal Solar Facility Plan/Install8634
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8634-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008634-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Municipal Solar Facility Plan/Install 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
67Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
68
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Community Center Gen Improvement Phase 38650
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8650-4200 Contract Services
261,640.00 114,045.18 114,045.18 44.628650-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2,700.00 144,894.82
Total Community Center Gen Improvement Phase 3 261,640.00 114,045.18 114,045.18 2,700.00 144,894.82 44.62
68Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
69
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Citywide Energy Conservation Upgrades8656
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8656-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008656-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Citywide Energy Conservation Upgrades 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
69Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
70
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
City Fac. Condition Assessm.& Asbesto Rp8664
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8664-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008664-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total City Fac. Condition Assessm.& Asbesto Rp 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
70Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
71
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Community Center, Plaza, and Park Improv8667
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8667-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008667-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Community Center, Plaza, and Park Improv 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
71Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
72
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Council Chambers Improvements8672
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8672-4200 Contract Services
106,209.00 0.00 0.00 0.008672-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 106,209.00
Total Council Chambers Improvements 106,209.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106,209.00 0.00
72Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
73
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Police Dept Substation Facility Improvem8674
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8674-4200 Contract Services
5,755.00 902.81 902.81 15.698674-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 4,852.19
Total Police Dept Substation Facility Improvem 5,755.00 902.81 902.81 0.00 4,852.19 15.69
73Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
74
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Bard Street Closure8683
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8683-4200 Contract Services
57,989.00 350.00 350.00 94.558683-4201 Contract Serv/Private 54,477.00 3,162.00
Total Bard Street Closure 57,989.00 350.00 350.00 54,477.00 3,162.00 94.55
74Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
75
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
General Fund001
Citywide Maintenance/Staff Aug8690
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8690-4100 Personal Services
0.00 1,746.00 1,746.00 0.008690-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 -1,746.00
Total Citywide Maintenance/Staff Aug 0.00 1,746.00 1,746.00 0.00 -1,746.00 0.00
Total General Fund 42,023,969.00 25,439,788.89 25,439,788.89 153,367.42 16,430,812.69 60.90
75Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
76
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund105
Interfund Transfers Out1299
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
11,054.00 7,368.00 7,368.00 66.651299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 3,686.00
Total Interfund Transfers Out 11,054.00 7,368.00 7,368.00 0.00 3,686.00 66.65
76Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
77
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund105
Lighting/Landscaping/Medians2601
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2601-4100 Personal Services
113,688.00 61,561.25 61,561.25 54.152601-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 52,126.75
3,000.00 4,642.09 4,642.09 154.742601-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -1,642.09
6,244.00 5,046.86 5,046.86 80.832601-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 1,197.14
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 0.00
37,577.00 16,143.88 16,143.88 42.962601-4180 Retirement 0.00 21,433.12
31,067.00 16,060.35 16,060.35 51.702601-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 15,006.65
1,658.00 1,042.47 1,042.47 62.882601-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 615.53
8,605.00 5,736.64 5,736.64 66.672601-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 2,868.36
Total Personal Services 201,839.00 110,233.54 110,233.54 0.00 91,605.46 54.61
2601-4200 Contract Services
51,200.00 31,397.80 31,397.80 61.322601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 19,802.20
18,493.00 28,420.01 28,420.01 153.682601-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 -9,927.01
Total Contract Services 69,693.00 59,817.81 59,817.81 0.00 9,875.19 85.83
2601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
244,574.00 136,475.39 136,475.39 55.802601-4303 Utilities 0.00 108,098.61
29,100.00 10,134.11 10,134.11 34.832601-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 18,965.89
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4326 Prior Yr Expense 0.00 0.00
667.00 448.00 448.00 67.172601-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 219.00
47,542.00 31,694.64 31,694.64 66.672601-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 15,847.36
73,475.00 48,984.00 48,984.00 66.672601-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 24,491.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 395,358.00 227,736.14 227,736.14 0.00 167,621.86 57.60
Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 666,890.00 397,787.49 397,787.49 0.00 269,102.51 59.65
Total Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 677,944.00 405,155.49 405,155.49 0.00 272,788.51 59.76
77Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
78
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
State Gas Tax Fund115
Interfund Transfers Out1299
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
489,707.00 326,472.00 326,472.00 66.671299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 163,235.00
Total Interfund Transfers Out 489,707.00 326,472.00 326,472.00 0.00 163,235.00 66.67
78Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
79
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
State Gas Tax Fund115
Street Maint/Traffic Safety3104
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 0.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3104-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Street Maint/Traffic Safety 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
79Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
80
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
State Gas Tax Fund115
PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8143-4200 Contract Services
34,581.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 34,581.00
Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 34,581.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,581.00 0.00
80Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
81
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
State Gas Tax Fund115
8th Street Improvements8173
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8173-4200 Contract Services
325,744.00 0.00 0.00 0.008173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 325,744.00
Total 8th Street Improvements 325,744.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 325,744.00 0.00
81Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
82
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
State Gas Tax Fund115
Street Improvements Various Locations8174
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8174-4200 Contract Services
144,021.00 140,806.07 140,806.07 97.778174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 3,214.93
Total Street Improvements Various Locations 144,021.00 140,806.07 140,806.07 0.00 3,214.93 97.77
82Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
83
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
State Gas Tax Fund115
Street Improvement Various Locations8186
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8186-4200 Contract Services
57,925.00 0.00 0.00 0.008186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 57,925.00
Total Street Improvement Various Locations 57,925.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57,925.00 0.00
Total State Gas Tax Fund 1,051,978.00 467,278.07 467,278.07 0.00 584,699.93 44.42
83Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
84
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
AB939 Fund117
Source Redctn/Recycle Element5301
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
5301-4100 Personal Services
10,419.00 6,739.19 6,739.19 64.685301-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 3,679.81
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.005301-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 0.00
1,587.00 0.00 0.00 0.005301-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 1,587.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.005301-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 0.00
720.00 452.63 452.63 62.875301-4180 Retirement 0.00 267.37
935.00 619.12 619.12 66.225301-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 315.88
163.00 105.61 105.61 64.795301-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 57.39
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.005301-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits/OPEB 0.00 0.00
Total Personal Services 13,824.00 7,916.55 7,916.55 0.00 5,907.45 57.27
5301-4200 Contract Services
19,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.005301-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 19,500.00
Total Contract Services 19,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,500.00 0.00
5301-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
2,350.00 2,339.29 2,339.29 99.545301-4315 Membership 0.00 10.71
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.005301-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 0.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,350.00 2,339.29 2,339.29 0.00 10.71 99.54
Total AB939 Fund 35,674.00 10,255.84 10,255.84 0.00 25,418.16 28.75
84Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
85
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Prop A Open Space Fund121
Interfund Transfers Out1299
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
20,557.00 13,704.00 13,704.00 66.661299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 6,853.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 20,557.00 13,704.00 13,704.00 0.00 6,853.00 66.66
Total Prop A Open Space Fund 20,557.00 13,704.00 13,704.00 0.00 6,853.00 66.66
85Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
86
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Tyco Fund122
Interfund Transfers Out1299
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
210,463.00 140,312.00 140,312.00 66.671299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out 0.00 70,151.00
Total Interfund Transfers Out 210,463.00 140,312.00 140,312.00 0.00 70,151.00 66.67
86Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
87
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Tyco Fund122
Parks6101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
6101-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Parks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
87Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
88
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Tyco Fund122
8th Street Improvements8173
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8173-4200 Contract Services
67,825.00 52,745.10 52,745.10 77.778173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 15,079.90
Total 8th Street Improvements 67,825.00 52,745.10 52,745.10 0.00 15,079.90 77.77
88Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
89
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Tyco Fund122
Street Improvements Various Locations8174
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8174-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Street Improvements Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
89Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
90
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Tyco Fund122
Street Improvement Various Locations8186
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8186-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Street Improvement Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
90Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
91
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Tyco Fund122
Municipal Pier Structural Assess/Repair8629
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8629-4200 Contract Services
177,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.008629-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 177,380.00
Total Municipal Pier Structural Assess /Repair 177,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 177,380.00 0.00
91Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
92
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Tyco Fund122
14Th. St. Beach Restroom Rehabilitation8631
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8631-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008631-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total 14Th. St. Beach Restroom Rehabilitation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
92Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
93
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Tyco Fund122
Municipal Pier Structural Repairs Phase38660
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8660-4200 Contract Services
275,473.00 0.00 0.00 0.008660-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 275,473.00
Total Municipal Pier Structural Repairs Phase3 275,473.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 275,473.00 0.00
93Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
94
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Tyco Fund122
Municipal Pier Use Options & Feasibility8678
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8678-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008678-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Municipal Pier Use Options & Feasibility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
94Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
95
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Tyco Fund122
Pier Restroom Rehabilitation8679
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8679-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008679-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Pier Restroom Rehabilitation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Tyco Fund 731,141.00 193,057.10 193,057.10 0.00 538,083.90 26.40
95Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
96
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125
Community Resources4601
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4601-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Community Resources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
96Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
97
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125
Parks6101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
6101-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Parks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
97Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
98
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125
Citywide Park Master Plan8538
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8538-4100 Personal Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008538-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008538-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008538-4180 Retirement 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008538-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008538-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 0.00
Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8538-4200 Contract Services
173,410.00 0.00 0.00 0.008538-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 173,410.00
Total Citywide Park Master Plan 173,410.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 173,410.00 0.00
98Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
99
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125
Clark Stadium Bleachers8545
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8545-4200 Contract Services
30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008545-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 30,000.00
Total Clark Stadium Bleachers 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00
99Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
100
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125
Citywide Park Improvements8546
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8546-4200 Contract Services
56,359.00 33,511.08 33,511.08 88.798546-4201 Contract Serv/Private 16,530.82 6,317.10
Total Citywide Park Improvements 56,359.00 33,511.08 33,511.08 16,530.82 6,317.10 88.79
100Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
101
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125
Citywide Energy Conservation Upgrades8656
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8656-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008656-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Citywide Energy Conservation Upgrades 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
101Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
102
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125
Community Center, Plaza, and Park Improv8667
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8667-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008667-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Community Center, Plaza, and Park Improv 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 259,769.00 33,511.08 33,511.08 16,530.82 209,727.10 19.26
102Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
103
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund135
Administrative Charges1219
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1219-4200 Contract Services
1,350.00 785.82 785.82 58.211219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 564.18
Total Administrative Charges 1,350.00 785.82 785.82 0.00 564.18 58.21
103Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
104
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund135
Interfund Transfers Out1299
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
2,307.00 1,536.00 1,536.00 66.581299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out 0.00 771.00
Total Interfund Transfers Out 2,307.00 1,536.00 1,536.00 0.00 771.00 66.58
Total Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 3,657.00 2,321.82 2,321.82 0.00 1,335.18 63.49
104Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
105
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund136
Administrative Charges1219
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1219-4200 Contract Services
1,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.001219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 1,200.00
Total Administrative Charges 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.00
105Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
106
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund136
Interfund Transfers Out1299
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
301.00 0.00 0.00 0.001299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 301.00
Total Interfund Transfers Out 301.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 301.00 0.00
Total Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 1,501.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,501.00 0.00
106Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
107
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund137
Administrative Charges1219
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1219-4200 Contract Services
5,585.00 3,143.15 3,143.15 56.281219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 2,441.85
Total Administrative Charges 5,585.00 3,143.15 3,143.15 0.00 2,441.85 56.28
107Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
108
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund137
Interfund Transfers Out1299
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
5,264.00 3,512.00 3,512.00 66.721299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 1,752.00
Total Interfund Transfers Out 5,264.00 3,512.00 3,512.00 0.00 1,752.00 66.72
Total Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund 10,849.00 6,655.15 6,655.15 0.00 4,193.85 61.34
108Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
109
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund138
Administrative Charges1219
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1219-4200 Contract Services
5,740.00 3,401.53 3,401.53 59.261219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 2,338.47
Total Administrative Charges 5,740.00 3,401.53 3,401.53 0.00 2,338.47 59.26
109Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
110
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund138
Interfund Transfers Out1299
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
5,710.00 3,808.00 3,808.00 66.691299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 1,902.00
Total Interfund Transfers Out 5,710.00 3,808.00 3,808.00 0.00 1,902.00 66.69
Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 11,450.00 7,209.53 7,209.53 0.00 4,240.47 62.97
110Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
111
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund139
Administrative Charges1219
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1219-4200 Contract Services
1,453.00 738.45 738.45 50.821219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 714.55
Total Administrative Charges 1,453.00 738.45 738.45 0.00 714.55 50.82
111Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
112
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund139
Interfund Transfers Out1299
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1,891.00 1,264.00 1,264.00 66.841299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 627.00
Total Interfund Transfers Out 1,891.00 1,264.00 1,264.00 0.00 627.00 66.84
Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 3,344.00 2,002.45 2,002.45 0.00 1,341.55 59.88
112Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
113
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Community Dev Block Grant140
CDBG Program General Admin4707
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4707-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004707-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total CDBG Program General Admin 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
113Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
114
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Community Dev Block Grant140
City Right of Way ADA Improvements8657
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8657-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008657-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total City Right of Way ADA Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
114Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
115
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Community Dev Block Grant140
ADA Improvements at Various Locations8687
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8687-4200 Contract Services
150,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008687-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 150,000.00
Total ADA Improvements at Various Locations 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 0.00
115Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
116
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Community Dev Block Grant140
ADA Improvements at Various Locations8691
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8691-4200 Contract Services
120,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008691-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 120,000.00
Total ADA Improvements at Various Locations 120,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120,000.00 0.00
Total Community Dev Block Grant 270,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 270,000.00 0.00
116Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
117
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition A Fund145
Interfund Transfers Out1299
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 0.00
Total Interfund Transfers Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
117Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
118
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition A Fund145
Bus Pass Subsidy3403
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3403-4200 Contract Services
3,500.00 636.00 636.00 18.173403-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 2,864.00
Total Bus Pass Subsidy 3,500.00 636.00 636.00 0.00 2,864.00 18.17
118Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
119
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition A Fund145
Dial-A-Taxi Program3404
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3404-4200 Contract Services
76,000.00 29,190.40 29,190.40 38.413404-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 46,809.60
Total Dial-A-Taxi Program 76,000.00 29,190.40 29,190.40 0.00 46,809.60 38.41
119Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
120
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition A Fund145
Commuter Express3408
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3408-4100 Personal Services
5,050.00 1,365.46 1,365.46 27.043408-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 3,684.54
Total Personal Services 5,050.00 1,365.46 1,365.46 0.00 3,684.54 27.04
3408-4200 Contract Services
33,664.00 0.00 0.00 0.003408-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 33,664.00
Total Contract Services 33,664.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,664.00 0.00
Total Commuter Express 38,714.00 1,365.46 1,365.46 0.00 37,348.54 3.53
120Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
121
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition A Fund145
Recreation Transportation3409
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3409-4200 Contract Services
40,000.00 29,630.68 29,630.68 74.083409-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 10,369.32
Total Recreation Transportation 40,000.00 29,630.68 29,630.68 0.00 10,369.32 74.08
121Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
122
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition A Fund145
Special Event Shuttle3410
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3410-4200 Contract Services
6,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 50.003410-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 3,000.00
Total Special Event Shuttle 6,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 50.00
122Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
123
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition A Fund145
After School Program Shuttle3411
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3411-4200 Contract Services
43,200.00 12,250.00 12,250.00 28.363411-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 30,950.00
Total After School Program Shuttle 43,200.00 12,250.00 12,250.00 0.00 30,950.00 28.36
123Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
124
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition A Fund145
Beach Cities Transit Line 1093412
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3412-4200 Contract Services
13,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003412-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 13,000.00
Total Beach Cities Transit Line 109 13,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,000.00 0.00
124Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
125
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition A Fund145
PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8143-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
125Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
126
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition A Fund145
Street Improvements Various Locations8174
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8174-4200 Contract Services
274,892.00 7,709.48 7,709.48 2.808174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 267,182.52
Total Street Improvements Various Locations 274,892.00 7,709.48 7,709.48 0.00 267,182.52 2.80
126Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
127
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition A Fund145
Street Improvement Various Locations8186
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8186-4200 Contract Services
59,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 59,000.00
Total Street Improvement Various Locations 59,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59,000.00 0.00
Total Proposition A Fund 554,306.00 83,782.02 83,782.02 0.00 470,523.98 15.11
127Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
128
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition C Fund146
Pavement Management Study4208
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4208-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004208-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Pavement Management Study 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
128Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
129
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition C Fund146
PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8143-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
129Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
130
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition C Fund146
Street Improvements Various Locations8174
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8174-4100 Personal Services
3,131.00 3,130.80 3,130.80 99.998174-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 0.20
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.008174-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 0.00
Total Personal Services 3,231.00 3,230.80 3,230.80 0.00 0.20 99.99
8174-4200 Contract Services
796,102.00 326,762.00 326,762.00 41.058174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 469,340.00
Total Contract Services 796,102.00 326,762.00 326,762.00 0.00 469,340.00 41.05
Total Street Improvements Various Locations 799,333.00 329,992.80 329,992.80 0.00 469,340.20 41.28
130Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
131
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Proposition C Fund146
Street Improvement Various Locations8186
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8186-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Street Improvement Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Proposition C Fund 799,333.00 329,992.80 329,992.80 0.00 469,340.20 41.28
131Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
132
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Measure R Fund147
PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8143-4200 Contract Services
243,662.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 243,662.00
Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 243,662.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 243,662.00 0.00
132Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
133
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Measure R Fund147
PCH Traffic Improvements8160
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8160-4200 Contract Services
399,922.00 0.00 0.00 0.008160-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 399,922.00
Total PCH Traffic Improvements 399,922.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 399,922.00 0.00
133Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
134
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Measure R Fund147
Bike Friendly Street Improvements8168
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8168-4200 Contract Services
20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008168-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 20,000.00
Total Bike Friendly Street Improvements 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00
134Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
135
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Measure R Fund147
Street Improvements Various Locations8174
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8174-4200 Contract Services
766,885.00 241,319.43 241,319.43 31.478174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 525,565.57
Total Street Improvements Various Locations 766,885.00 241,319.43 241,319.43 0.00 525,565.57 31.47
135Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
136
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Measure R Fund147
Street Improvement Various Locations8186
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8186-4200 Contract Services
89,551.00 0.00 0.00 0.008186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 89,551.00
Total Street Improvement Various Locations 89,551.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 89,551.00 0.00
136Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
137
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Measure R Fund147
Strand Bikeway/Walkway Improvments- 35th8188
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8188-4200 Contract Services
115,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008188-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 115,000.00
Total Strand Bikeway/Walkway Improvments - 35th 115,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 115,000.00 0.00
Total Measure R Fund 1,635,020.00 241,319.43 241,319.43 0.00 1,393,700.57 14.76
137Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
138
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Measure M148
PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8143-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
138Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
139
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Measure M148
PCH Traffic Improvements8160
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8160-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008160-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total PCH Traffic Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
139Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
140
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Measure M148
Street Improvements Various Locations8174
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8174-4200 Contract Services
282,875.00 0.00 0.00 0.008174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 282,875.00
Total Street Improvements Various Locations 282,875.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 282,875.00 0.00
140Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
141
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Measure M148
Street Improvement Various Locations8186
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8186-4200 Contract Services
201,231.00 0.00 0.00 0.008186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 201,231.00
Total Street Improvement Various Locations 201,231.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 201,231.00 0.00
Total Measure M 484,106.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 484,106.00 0.00
141Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
142
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
City Homeless Planning Grant1220
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1220-4200 Contract Services
2,364.00 0.00 0.00 0.001220-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 2,364.00
Total City Homeless Planning Grant 2,364.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,364.00 0.00
142Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
143
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Green Business Program1221
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1221-4200 Contract Services
30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001221-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 30,000.00
Total Green Business Program 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00
143Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
144
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Bulletproof Vest Partnership2111
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2111-4200 Contract Services
584.00 0.00 0.00 0.002111-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 584.00
Total Contract Services 584.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 584.00 0.00
2111-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
2,700.00 765.40 765.40 99.772111-4350 Safety Gear 1,928.29 6.31
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,700.00 765.40 765.40 1,928.29 6.31 99.77
Total Bulletproof Vest Partnership 3,284.00 765.40 765.40 1,928.29 590.31 82.02
144Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
145
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Mental Health Evaluation Team (MET)2118
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2118-4200 Contract Services
21,854.00 0.00 0.00 0.002118-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 21,854.00
Total Mental Health Evaluation Team (MET) 21,854.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,854.00 0.00
145Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
146
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Body Worn Camera2119
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2119-4200 Contract Services
41,681.00 23,354.40 23,354.40 56.032119-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 18,326.60
Total Body Worn Camera 41,681.00 23,354.40 23,354.40 0.00 18,326.60 56.03
146Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
147
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
St Homeland Security Prg- Radio Upgrades2120
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2120-4200 Contract Services
83,911.00 0.00 0.00 0.002120-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 83,911.00
Total St Homeland Security Prg- Radio Upgrades 83,911.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83,911.00 0.00
147Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
148
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Fireman's Fund Emerg Prep Prog Grant2225
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2225-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002225-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002225-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Fireman's Fund Emerg Prep Prog Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
148Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
149
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Beverage Recycle Grant3102
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3102-4200 Contract Services
31,881.00 3,390.25 3,390.25 10.633102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 28,490.75
Total Beverage Recycle Grant 31,881.00 3,390.25 3,390.25 0.00 28,490.75 10.63
149Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
150
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Sea Level Rise Study/Coastal Conservancy3106
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3106-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Sea Level Rise Study/Coastal Conservancy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
150Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
151
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Coastal Permit Auth Grant4104
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4104-4200 Contract Services
23,013.00 0.00 0.00 0.004104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 23,013.00
Total Contract Services 23,013.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,013.00 0.00
4104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004104-4305 Office Operating Supplies 0.00 0.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Coastal Permit Auth Grant 23,013.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,013.00 0.00
151Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
152
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Zoning Ordinance Update4105
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4105-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Zoning Ordinance Update 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
152Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
153
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Local Coastal Assistance Grant4107
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4107-4200 Contract Services
82,812.00 0.00 0.00 0.004107-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 82,812.00
Total Local Coastal Assistance Grant 82,812.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82,812.00 0.00
153Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
154
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program4210
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4210-4200 Contract Services
84,150.00 0.00 0.00 0.004210-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 84,150.00
Total Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program 84,150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 84,150.00 0.00
154Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
155
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
8th Street Improvements8173
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8173-4200 Contract Services
354,535.00 0.00 0.00 0.008173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 354,535.00
Total 8th Street Improvements 354,535.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 354,535.00 0.00
155Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
156
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
St Imp/21st Btwn PCH/Ardmore8184
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8184-4200 Contract Services
98,152.00 0.00 0.00 0.008184-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 98,152.00
Total St Imp/21st Btwn PCH/Ardmore 98,152.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98,152.00 0.00
156Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
157
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
ADA Improvements- PCH between 2nd & 21st8185
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8185-4200 Contract Services
287,260.00 504.00 504.00 0.188185-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 286,756.00
Total ADA Improvements- PCH between 2nd & 21st 287,260.00 504.00 504.00 0.00 286,756.00 0.18
157Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
158
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
South Park Phase II8540
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8540-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008540-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total South Park Phase II 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
158Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
159
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Stormwater/Urban Run-off Diversion Proj8542
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8542-4200 Contract Services
3,762,387.00 16,060.55 16,060.55 0.438542-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 3,746,326.45
Total Stormwater/Urban Run-off Diversion Proj 3,762,387.00 16,060.55 16,060.55 0.00 3,746,326.45 0.43
159Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
160
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Library Community Needs Assessment8668
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8668-4200 Contract Services
42,522.00 0.00 0.00 0.008668-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 42,522.00
Total Library Community Needs Assessment 42,522.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42,522.00 0.00
160Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
161
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Grants Fund150
Electric Vehicle, Bicycle Transportation8682
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8682-4200 Contract Services
162,977.00 39,139.87 39,139.87 24.028682-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 123,837.13
Total Electric Vehicle, Bicycle Transportation 162,977.00 39,139.87 39,139.87 0.00 123,837.13 24.02
Total Grants Fund 5,112,783.00 83,214.47 83,214.47 1,928.29 5,027,640.24 1.67
161Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
162
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund152
Emission Control3701
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3701-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003701-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3701-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
26,525.00 2,970.00 2,970.00 11.203701-4327 AQMD Incentives 0.00 23,555.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 26,525.00 2,970.00 2,970.00 0.00 23,555.00 11.20
3701-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003701-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3701-5400 Equipment/Furniture
35,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003701-5403 Vehicles 0.00 35,000.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 35,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,000.00 0.00
Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 61,525.00 2,970.00 2,970.00 0.00 58,555.00 4.83
162Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
163
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)153
C.O.P.S. Program2106
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2106-4200 Contract Services
58,456.00 17,614.27 17,614.27 30.132106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 40,841.73
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002106-4251 Contract Services/Govt 0.00 0.00
Total Contract Services 58,456.00 17,614.27 17,614.27 0.00 40,841.73 30.13
2106-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002106-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002106-4314 Uniforms 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002106-4315 Membership 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002106-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002106-4350 Safety Gear 0.00 0.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2106-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002106-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2106-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002106-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002106-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002106-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.00
182,192.00 72,632.34 72,632.34 40.332106-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 847.53 108,712.13
Total Equipment/Furniture 182,192.00 72,632.34 72,632.34 847.53 108,712.13 40.33
2106-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002106-5601 Buildings 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002106-5602 Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF) 240,648.00 90,246.61 90,246.61 847.53 149,553.86 37.85
163Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
164
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Sewer Fund160
Administrative Charges1219
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1219-4200 Contract Services
0.00 1,851.02 1,851.02 0.001219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -1,851.02
Total Administrative Charges 0.00 1,851.02 1,851.02 0.00 -1,851.02 0.00
164Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
165
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Sewer Fund160
Sewers/Storm Drains3102
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3102-4100 Personal Services
75,768.00 48,599.61 48,599.61 64.143102-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 27,168.39
410.00 180.19 180.19 43.953102-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 229.81
7,125.00 4,778.85 4,778.85 67.073102-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 2,346.15
0.00 620.64 620.64 0.003102-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -620.64
16,733.00 9,524.28 9,524.28 56.923102-4180 Retirement 0.00 7,208.72
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 0.00
11,982.00 7,916.34 7,916.34 66.073102-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 4,065.66
1,115.00 802.37 802.37 71.963102-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 312.63
3,626.00 2,417.36 2,417.36 66.673102-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 1,208.64
Total Personal Services 116,759.00 74,839.64 74,839.64 0.00 41,919.36 64.10
3102-4200 Contract Services
255,910.00 151,883.51 151,883.51 59.353102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 104,026.49
4,231.00 2,286.00 2,286.00 54.033102-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 1,945.00
Total Contract Services 260,141.00 154,169.51 154,169.51 0.00 105,971.49 59.26
3102-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
695.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4303 Utilities 0.00 695.00
7,600.00 367.88 367.88 4.843102-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 7,232.12
267.00 176.00 176.00 65.923102-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 91.00
34,371.00 22,914.00 22,914.00 66.673102-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 11,457.00
23,110.00 15,408.00 15,408.00 66.673102-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 7,702.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 66,043.00 38,865.88 38,865.88 0.00 27,177.12 58.85
3102-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3102-5400 Equipment/Furniture
165Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
166
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Sewer Fund160
Sewers/Storm Drains3102
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Sewers/Storm Drains 442,943.00 267,875.03 267,875.03 0.00 175,067.97 60.48
166Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
167
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Sewer Fund160
Used Oil Block Grant3105
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3105-4200 Contract Services
12,181.00 575.67 575.67 4.733105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 11,605.33
Total Used Oil Block Grant 12,181.00 575.67 575.67 0.00 11,605.33 4.73
167Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
168
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Sewer Fund160
Sewer Improvements Various Locations8403
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8403-4100 Personal Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008403-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008403-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008403-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008403-4180 Retirement 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008403-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 0.00
Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8403-4200 Contract Services
20,377.00 0.00 0.00 0.008403-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 20,377.00
Total Sewer Improvements Various Locations 20,377.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,377.00 0.00
168Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
169
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Sewer Fund160
Sewer Improvements Various Locations8416
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8416-4200 Contract Services
1,260,000.00 140,162.32 140,162.32 11.128416-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 1,119,837.68
Total Sewer Improvements Various Locations 1,260,000.00 140,162.32 140,162.32 0.00 1,119,837.68 11.12
169Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
170
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Sewer Fund160
14th Street Beach Restroom Rehab8692
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8692-4200 Contract Services
110,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008692-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 110,000.00
Total 14th Street Beach Restroom Rehab 110,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110,000.00 0.00
Total Sewer Fund 1,845,501.00 410,464.04 410,464.04 0.00 1,435,036.96 22.24
170Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
171
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Storm Drains Fund161
Storm Drain3109
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3109-4100 Personal Services
69,416.00 47,744.85 47,744.85 68.783109-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 21,671.15
1,500.00 180.19 180.19 12.013109-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 1,319.81
5,464.00 4,733.75 4,733.75 86.643109-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 730.25
0.00 3,103.10 3,103.10 0.003109-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 -3,103.10
13,884.00 8,410.55 8,410.55 60.583109-4180 Retirement 0.00 5,473.45
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 0.00
10,398.00 7,726.80 7,726.80 74.313109-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 2,671.20
1,022.00 824.96 824.96 80.723109-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 197.04
3,065.00 2,043.36 2,043.36 66.673109-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits/OPEB 0.00 1,021.64
Total Personal Services 104,749.00 74,767.56 74,767.56 0.00 29,981.44 71.38
3109-4200 Contract Services
166,680.00 33,074.33 33,074.33 20.643109-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,331.60 132,274.07
9,594.00 8,539.00 8,539.00 89.003109-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 1,055.00
Total Contract Services 176,274.00 41,613.33 41,613.33 1,331.60 133,329.07 24.36
3109-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4303 Utilities 0.00 0.00
3,800.00 4,013.57 4,013.57 105.623109-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 -213.57
400.00 264.00 264.00 66.003109-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 136.00
35,401.00 23,600.64 23,600.64 66.673109-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 11,800.36
11,079.00 7,384.00 7,384.00 66.653109-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 3,695.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 50,680.00 35,262.21 35,262.21 0.00 15,417.79 69.58
Total Storm Drain 331,703.00 151,643.10 151,643.10 1,331.60 178,728.30 46.12
171Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
172
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Storm Drains Fund161
Storm Drain Master Plan8415
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8415-4100 Personal Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008415-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008415-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008415-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008415-4180 Retirement 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008415-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 0.00
Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8415-4200 Contract Services
21,827.00 0.00 0.00 0.008415-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 21,827.00
Total Storm Drain Master Plan 21,827.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,827.00 0.00
172Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
173
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Storm Drains Fund161
Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati8417
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8417-4200 Contract Services
645,090.00 0.00 0.00 0.008417-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 645,090.00
Total Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati 645,090.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 645,090.00 0.00
Total Storm Drains Fund 998,620.00 151,643.10 151,643.10 1,331.60 845,645.30 15.32
173Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
174
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170
Special Investigations2103
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2103-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002103-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002103-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002103-4904 Depreciation/Improvements 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2103-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002103-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002103-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Special Investigations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
174Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
175
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170
Police K-9 Program2105
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2105-4200 Contract Services
2,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.002105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 2,500.00
Total Contract Services 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00
2105-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
722.00 0.00 0.00 0.002105-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 722.00
3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.002105-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 3,000.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3,722.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,722.00 0.00
2105-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002105-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2105-5400 Equipment/Furniture
600.00 0.00 0.00 0.002105-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 600.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002105-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002105-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600.00 0.00
Total Police K-9 Program 6,822.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,822.00 0.00
175Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
176
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170
Mounted Patrol Unit2116
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2116-4200 Contract Services
4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.002116-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 4,000.00
Total Mounted Patrol Unit 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00
Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 10,822.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,822.00 0.00
176Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
177
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Fire Protection Fund180
Fire Protection2202
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2202-4200 Contract Services
56,596.00 33,501.38 33,501.38 59.192202-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 23,094.62
Total Fire Protection Fund 56,596.00 33,501.38 33,501.38 0.00 23,094.62 59.19
177Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
178
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
RTI Undersea Cable190
Parks6101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
6101-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Parks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
178Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
179
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
RTI Undersea Cable190
8th Street Improvements8173
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8173-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total 8th Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
179Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
180
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
RTI Undersea Cable190
Street Improvements Various Locations8174
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8174-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Street Improvements Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
180Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
181
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
RTI Undersea Cable190
Street Improvement Various Locations8186
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8186-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Street Improvement Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
181Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
182
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
RTI Undersea Cable190
Municipal Pier Structural Assess/Repair8629
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8629-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008629-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Municipal Pier Structural Assess /Repair 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
182Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
183
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
RTI Undersea Cable190
14Th. St. Beach Restroom Rehabilitation8631
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8631-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008631-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total RTI Undersea Cable 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
183Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
184
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
RTI Tidelands191
Municipal Pier Structural Assess/Repair8629
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8629-4200 Contract Services
240,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008629-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 240,000.00
Total RTI Tidelands 240,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240,000.00 0.00
184Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
185
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
2015 Lease Revenue Bonds201
Legal Settlements- E&B Resources1220
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1220-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001220-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1220-6700 Interest
333,712.00 172,606.29 172,606.29 51.721220-6701 Interest 0.00 161,105.71
Total Interest 333,712.00 172,606.29 172,606.29 0.00 161,105.71 51.72
1220-6800 Principal
460,000.00 459,825.50 459,825.50 99.961220-6801 Principal Payment 0.00 174.50
Total Principal 460,000.00 459,825.50 459,825.50 0.00 174.50 99.96
1220-6900 Lease Payments
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001220-6901 Principal Payment 0.00 0.00
Total Lease Payments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds 793,712.00 632,431.79 632,431.79 0.00 161,280.21 79.68
185Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
186
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
City Manager1201
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1201-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1201-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total City Manager 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
186Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
187
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Storm Drains3109
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3109-4200 Contract Services
80,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 80,000.00
Total Storm Drains 80,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,000.00 0.00
187Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
188
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Public Works Administration4202
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4202-4200 Contract Services
75,672.00 34,214.28 34,214.28 45.214202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 41,457.72
Total Contract Services 75,672.00 34,214.28 34,214.28 0.00 41,457.72 45.21
4202-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Public Works Administration 75,672.00 34,214.28 34,214.28 0.00 41,457.72 45.21
188Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
189
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Pier Ave/Hermosa Ave to PCH8116
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8116-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008116-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Pier Ave/Hermosa Ave to PCH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
189Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
190
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore8129
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8129-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008129-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
190Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
191
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Gould Avenue Street Improvements8141
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8141-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008141-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Gould Avenue Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
191Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
192
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8143-4200 Contract Services
263,437.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 263,437.00
Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 263,437.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 263,437.00 0.00
192Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
193
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
St Imprv/Hillcrest & Rhodes8159
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8159-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008159-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total St Imprv/Hillcrest & Rhodes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
193Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
194
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
PCH Traffic Improvements8160
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8160-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008160-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total PCH Traffic Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
194Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
195
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Green Ally and Beach Quality Improvement8162
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8162-4200 Contract Services
187,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.008162-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 187,500.00
Total Green Ally and Beach Quality Improvement 187,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 187,500.00 0.00
195Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
196
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
8th Street Improvements8173
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8173-4200 Contract Services
308,438.00 0.00 0.00 0.008173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 308,438.00
Total 8th Street Improvements 308,438.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 308,438.00 0.00
196Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
197
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Street Improvements Various Locations8174
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8174-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Street Improvements Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
197Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
198
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Street Improvement Various Locations8186
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8186-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Street Improvement Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
198Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
199
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Stamped Concrete Replacement -Strand8187
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8187-4200 Contract Services
140,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008187-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 140,000.00
Total Stamped Concrete Replacement -Strand 140,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140,000.00 0.00
199Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
200
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Strand Bikeway/Walkway Improvments- 35th8188
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8188-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008188-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Strand Bikeway/Walkway Improvments - 35th 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
200Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
201
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
St Improvements/Myrtle Area8189
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8189-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008189-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total St Improvements/Myrtle Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
201Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
202
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Sewer Improvements- Various Locations8402
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8402-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008402-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Sewer Improvements- Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
202Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
203
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Greenbelt Root Barrier System8504
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8504-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008504-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Greenbelt Root Barrier System 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
203Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
204
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Stormwater/Urban Run-Off Diversion Proj8542
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8542-4200 Contract Services
421,618.00 2,528.05 2,528.05 0.608542-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 419,089.95
Total Stormwater/Urban Run-Off Diversion Proj 421,618.00 2,528.05 2,528.05 0.00 419,089.95 0.60
204Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
205
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Feasibility. Greenbelt Path8544
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8544-4200 Contract Services
10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008544-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 10,000.00
Total Feasibility. Greenbelt Path 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00
205Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
206
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Pkg Lot Paving-75-14Th St8605
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8605-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008605-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Pkg Lot Paving-75-14Th St 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
206Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
207
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation8609
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8609-4200 Contract Services
559,055.00 0.00 0.00 0.008609-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 559,055.00
Total Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation 559,055.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 559,055.00 0.00
207Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
208
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
City Hall Replacement8611
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8611-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008611-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total City Hall Replacement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
208Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
209
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Police Facilities Improvements8614
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8614-4200 Contract Services
95,280.00 35,076.41 35,076.41 47.058614-4201 Contract Serv/Private 9,756.52 50,447.07
Total Police Facilities Improvements 95,280.00 35,076.41 35,076.41 9,756.52 50,447.07 47.05
209Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
210
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
New Corporate Yard Facility8615
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8615-4200 Contract Services
173,142.00 2,212.00 2,212.00 1.288615-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 170,930.00
Total New Corporate Yard Facility 173,142.00 2,212.00 2,212.00 0.00 170,930.00 1.28
210Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
211
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Police Building Replacement8618
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8618-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008618-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Police Building Replacement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
211Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
212
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Fire Department Tower Demolition8632
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8632-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008632-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Fire Department Tower Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
212Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
213
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Community Center Gen Improv- Phase III8650
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8650-4200 Contract Services
149,039.00 535.32 535.32 2.498650-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,182.00 145,321.68
Total Community Center Gen Improv- Phase III 149,039.00 535.32 535.32 3,182.00 145,321.68 2.49
213Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
214
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Lawn Bowling Lighting8657
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8657-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008657-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Lawn Bowling Lighting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
214Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
215
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs8660
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8660-4200 Contract Services
259,711.00 0.00 0.00 0.008660-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 259,711.00
Total Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs 259,711.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 259,711.00 0.00
215Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
216
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
City Fac. Condition Assessm.& Asbesto Rp8664
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8664-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008664-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total City Fac. Condition Assessm.& Asbesto Rp 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
216Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
217
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
City Park Restroom Renovations8669
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8669-4200 Contract Services
1,055,994.00 54,312.00 54,312.00 5.148669-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 1,001,682.00
Total City Park Restroom Renovations 1,055,994.00 54,312.00 54,312.00 0.00 1,001,682.00 5.14
217Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
218
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Tree Well Grates8670
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8670-4200 Contract Services
67,220.00 16,151.57 16,151.57 24.038670-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 51,068.43
Total Tree Well Grates 67,220.00 16,151.57 16,151.57 0.00 51,068.43 24.03
218Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
219
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Clark Field Restrooms8671
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8671-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008671-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Clark Field Restrooms 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
219Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
220
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Breakroom Improvements City Hall/Yard8673
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8673-4200 Contract Services
11,227.00 54,811.05 54,811.05 488.218673-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -43,584.05
Total Breakroom Improvements City Hall/Yard 11,227.00 54,811.05 54,811.05 0.00 -43,584.05 488.21
220Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
221
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Pier Plaza Lamp Post Replacement8675
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8675-4200 Contract Services
71,922.00 0.00 0.00 0.008675-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 71,922.00
Total Pier Plaza Lamp Post Replacement 71,922.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71,922.00 0.00
221Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
222
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
South Park Restroom Renovations8677
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8677-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008677-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total South Park Restroom Renovations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
222Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
223
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
CNG Slow-Fill Station8680
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8680-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008680-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total CNG Slow-Fill Station 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
223Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
224
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Facilities for Opportunities Study/Imp8681
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8681-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008681-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Facilities for Opportunities Study/Imp 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
224Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
225
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Electrical Vehicle & Bicycle Transportat8682
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8682-4200 Contract Services
47,186.00 0.00 0.00 0.008682-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 47,186.00
Total Electrical Vehicle & Bicycle Transportat 47,186.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,186.00 0.00
225Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
226
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Bard Street Closure8683
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8683-4200 Contract Services
55,000.00 10,913.58 10,913.58 19.848683-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 44,086.42
Total Bard Street Closure 55,000.00 10,913.58 10,913.58 0.00 44,086.42 19.84
226Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
227
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Emergency Op Center Renovations8684
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8684-4200 Contract Services
193,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.008684-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 193,500.00
Total Emergency Op Center Renovations 193,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 193,500.00 0.00
227Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
228
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Police Dept Report Writing Room8686
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8686-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008686-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Police Dept Report Writing Room 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
228Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
229
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Police Department Records & Jail Upgrade8688
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8688-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008688-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Police Department Records & Jail Upgrade 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
229Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
230
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Clark Building Renovations8689
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8689-4200 Contract Services
423,554.00 0.00 0.00 0.008689-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 423,554.00
Total Clark Building Renovations 423,554.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 423,554.00 0.00
230Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
231
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Capital Improvement Fund301
Community Theater Needs Assessment8693
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8693-4200 Contract Services
30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008693-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 30,000.00
Total Community Theater Needs Assessment 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00
Total Capital Improvement Fund 4,678,495.00 210,754.26 210,754.26 12,938.52 4,454,802.22 4.78
231Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
232
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Insurance Fund705
Liability Insurance1209
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1209-4100 Personal Services
42,268.00 27,031.88 27,031.88 63.951209-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 15,236.12
1,685.00 362.45 362.45 21.511209-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 1,322.55
11,740.00 6,551.07 6,551.07 55.801209-4180 Retirement 0.00 5,188.93
8,581.00 5,246.59 5,246.59 61.141209-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 3,334.41
648.00 420.63 420.63 64.911209-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 227.37
Total Personal Services 64,922.00 39,612.62 39,612.62 0.00 25,309.38 61.02
1209-4200 Contract Services
699,874.00 693,473.83 693,473.83 99.091209-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 6,400.17
Total Contract Services 699,874.00 693,473.83 693,473.83 0.00 6,400.17 99.09
1209-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 2.82 2.82 0.001209-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 -2.82
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001209-4315 Membership 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001209-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 0.00
400,000.00 141,493.84 141,493.84 35.371209-4324 Claims/Settlements 0.00 258,506.16
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 400,000.00 141,496.66 141,496.66 0.00 258,503.34 35.37
Total Liability Insurance 1,164,796.00 874,583.11 874,583.11 0.00 290,212.89 75.08
232Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
233
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Insurance Fund705
Auto/Property/Bonds1210
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1210-4200 Contract Services
65,330.00 62,173.80 62,173.80 95.171210-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 3,156.20
Total Contract Services 65,330.00 62,173.80 62,173.80 0.00 3,156.20 95.17
1210-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001210-4324 Claims/Settlements 0.00 10,000.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00
Total Auto/Property/Bonds 75,330.00 62,173.80 62,173.80 0.00 13,156.20 82.54
233Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
234
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Insurance Fund705
Unemployment1215
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1215-4100 Personal Services
10,000.00 10,771.00 10,771.00 107.711215-4186 Unemployment Claims 0.00 -771.00
Total Unemployment 10,000.00 10,771.00 10,771.00 0.00 -771.00 107.71
234Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
235
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Insurance Fund705
Workers' Compensation1217
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1217-4100 Personal Services
42,268.00 27,032.03 27,032.03 63.951217-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 15,235.97
1,685.00 362.45 362.45 21.511217-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 1,322.55
11,740.00 6,550.98 6,550.98 55.801217-4180 Retirement 0.00 5,189.02
8,582.00 5,246.19 5,246.19 61.131217-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 3,335.81
648.00 420.48 420.48 64.891217-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 227.52
Total Personal Services 64,923.00 39,612.13 39,612.13 0.00 25,310.87 61.01
1217-4200 Contract Services
332,129.00 253,606.00 253,606.00 96.301217-4201 Contract Serv/Private 66,241.82 12,281.18
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001217-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 0.00
Total Contract Services 332,129.00 253,606.00 253,606.00 66,241.82 12,281.18 96.30
1217-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
100.00 9.28 9.28 9.281217-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 90.72
1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001217-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 1,000.00
981,000.00 578,500.94 578,500.94 58.971217-4324 Claims/Settlements 0.00 402,499.06
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 982,100.00 578,510.22 578,510.22 0.00 403,589.78 58.91
Total Workers' Compensation 1,379,152.00 871,728.35 871,728.35 66,241.82 441,181.83 68.01
235Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
236
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Insurance Fund705
Interfund Transfers Out1299
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 0.00
Total Interfund Transfers Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Insurance Fund 2,629,278.00 1,819,256.26 1,819,256.26 66,241.82 743,779.92 71.71
236Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
237
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
City Council1101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1101-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
5,437.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs 0.00 5,437.00
Total Depreciation 5,437.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,437.00 0.00
1101-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1101-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-5601 Buildings 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total City Council 5,437.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,437.00 0.00
237Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
238
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
City Clerk1121
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1121-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001121-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
Total City Clerk 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
238Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
239
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
City Treasurer1141
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1141-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
Total City Treasurer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
239Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
240
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
City Manager1201
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1201-4200 Contract Services
197,385.00 106,494.39 106,494.39 53.951201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 90,890.61
Total Contract Services 197,385.00 106,494.39 106,494.39 0.00 90,890.61 53.95
1201-5400 Equipment/Furniture
672.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 672.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 672.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 672.00 0.00
Total City Manager 198,057.00 106,494.39 106,494.39 0.00 91,562.61 53.77
240Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
241
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Finance Administration1202
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1202-5400 Equipment/Furniture
1,350.00 0.00 0.00 0.001202-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 1,350.00
Total Finance Administration 1,350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,350.00 0.00
241Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
242
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Human Resources1203
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1203-5400 Equipment/Furniture
1,558.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 1,558.00
Total Human Resources 1,558.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,558.00 0.00
242Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
243
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Finance Cashier1204
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1204-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1204-5400 Equipment/Furniture
1,747.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 1,747.00
Total Finance Cashier 1,747.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,747.00 0.00
243Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
244
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Information Technology1206
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1206-4200 Contract Services
560,979.00 231,010.81 231,010.81 42.051206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4,868.80 325,099.39
Total Contract Services 560,979.00 231,010.81 231,010.81 4,868.80 325,099.39 42.05
1206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
30,200.00 22,488.61 22,488.61 74.471206-4304 Telephone 0.00 7,711.39
15,000.00 10,443.95 10,443.95 70.381206-4305 Office Oper Supplies 112.91 4,443.14
71.00 48.00 48.00 67.611206-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 23.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 45,271.00 32,980.56 32,980.56 112.91 12,177.53 73.10
1206-4900 Depreciation
65,060.00 0.00 0.00 0.001206-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 65,060.00
Total Depreciation 65,060.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65,060.00 0.00
1206-5400 Equipment/Furniture
1,633.00 0.00 0.00 0.001206-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 1,633.00
54,966.00 -7,213.59 -7,213.59 13.121206-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 62,179.59
88,419.00 25,307.06 25,307.06 28.621206-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 63,111.94
Total Equipment/Furniture 145,018.00 18,093.47 18,093.47 0.00 126,924.53 12.48
Total Information Technology 816,328.00 282,084.84 282,084.84 4,981.71 529,261.45 35.17
244Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
245
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
General Appropriations1208
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1208-4200 Contract Services
12,108.00 7,087.11 7,087.11 58.531208-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 5,020.89
Total Contract Services 12,108.00 7,087.11 7,087.11 0.00 5,020.89 58.53
1208-4900 Depreciation
6,956.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 6,956.00
Total Depreciation 6,956.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,956.00 0.00
1208-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
28,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 28,380.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 28,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,380.00 0.00
Total General Appropriations 47,444.00 7,087.11 7,087.11 0.00 40,356.89 14.94
245Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
246
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Police2101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2101-4200 Contract Services
39,272.00 31,888.91 31,888.91 81.202101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 7,383.09
Total Contract Services 39,272.00 31,888.91 31,888.91 0.00 7,383.09 81.20
2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
81,402.00 36,033.53 36,033.53 44.272101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 45,368.47
50,418.00 26,585.78 26,585.78 55.262101-4311 Auto Maintenance 1,275.75 22,556.47
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4350 Safety Gear 0.00 0.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 131,820.00 62,619.31 62,619.31 1,275.75 67,924.94 48.47
2101-4900 Depreciation
82,821.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 82,821.00
125,932.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 125,932.00
Total Depreciation 208,753.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 208,753.00 0.00
2101-5400 Equipment/Furniture
25,835.00 1,255.72 1,255.72 4.862101-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 24,579.28
22,313.00 0.00 0.00 10.852101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 2,420.60 19,892.40
332,690.00 31,992.48 31,992.48 9.622101-5403 Vehicles 0.00 300,697.52
1,090,462.00 769,139.51 769,139.51 73.172101-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 28,767.00 292,555.49
Total Equipment/Furniture 1,471,300.00 802,387.71 802,387.71 31,187.60 637,724.69 56.66
2101-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-5601 Buildings 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Police 1,851,145.00 896,895.93 896,895.93 32,463.35 921,785.72 50.20
246Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
247
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Fire2201
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2201-4200 Contract Services
0.00 8,500.00 8,500.00 0.002201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -8,500.00
Total Contract Services 0.00 8,500.00 8,500.00 0.00 -8,500.00 0.00
2201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 0.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2201-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2201-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Fire 0.00 8,500.00 8,500.00 0.00 -8,500.00 0.00
247Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
248
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Fire Protection2202
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002202-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 0.00
Total Fire Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
248Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
249
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Lighting/Landscaping/Medians2601
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
2601-4200 Contract Services
5,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 5,400.00
Total Contract Services 5,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,400.00 0.00
2601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
3,723.00 987.14 987.14 26.512601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 2,735.86
1,300.00 16.34 16.34 1.262601-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,283.66
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 5,023.00 1,003.48 1,003.48 0.00 4,019.52 19.98
2601-4900 Depreciation
7,942.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 7,942.00
10,036.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 10,036.00
Total Depreciation 17,978.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,978.00 0.00
2601-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 28,401.00 1,003.48 1,003.48 0.00 27,397.52 3.53
249Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
250
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Sewers/Storm Drains3102
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3102-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3102-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 1,000.00
4,500.00 108.88 108.88 2.423102-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 4,391.12
1,500.00 16.34 16.34 1.093102-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,483.66
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 7,000.00 125.22 125.22 0.00 6,874.78 1.79
3102-4900 Depreciation
14,052.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 14,052.00
9,539.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 9,539.00
Total Depreciation 23,591.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,591.00 0.00
3102-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Sewers/Storm Drains 30,591.00 125.22 125.22 0.00 30,465.78 0.41
250Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
251
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Street Maint/Traffic Safety3104
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
7,520.00 3,234.33 3,234.33 43.013104-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 4,285.67
5,977.00 1,630.87 1,630.87 27.293104-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 4,346.13
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 13,497.00 4,865.20 4,865.20 0.00 8,631.80 36.05
3104-4900 Depreciation
5,370.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 5,370.00
6,742.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 6,742.00
Total Depreciation 12,112.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,112.00 0.00
3104-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
46,000.00 142.88 142.88 1.623104-5403 Vehicles 600.05 45,257.07
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 46,000.00 142.88 142.88 600.05 45,257.07 1.62
Total Street Maint/Traffic Safety 71,609.00 5,008.08 5,008.08 600.05 66,000.87 7.83
251Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
252
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Storm Drains3109
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3109-4200 Contract Services
28,328.00 27,327.78 27,327.78 96.473109-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 1,000.22
Total Contract Services 28,328.00 27,327.78 27,327.78 0.00 1,000.22 96.47
3109-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
600.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 600.00
6,000.00 740.31 740.31 12.343109-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 5,259.69
1,430.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,430.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 8,030.00 740.31 740.31 0.00 7,289.69 9.22
3109-4900 Depreciation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3109-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Storm Drains 36,358.00 28,068.09 28,068.09 0.00 8,289.91 77.20
252Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
253
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Downtown Enhancement3301
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3301-5400 Equipment/Furniture
22,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 22,000.00
Total Downtown Enhancement 22,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,000.00 0.00
253Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
254
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Community Services3302
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
3302-4200 Contract Services
3,036.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 3,036.00
Total Contract Services 3,036.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,036.00 0.00
3302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
22,592.00 9,059.94 9,059.94 40.103302-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 13,532.06
8,000.00 2,719.42 2,719.42 33.993302-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 5,280.58
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 30,592.00 11,779.36 11,779.36 0.00 18,812.64 38.50
3302-4900 Depreciation
12,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 12,500.00
26,289.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 26,289.00
Total Depreciation 38,789.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,789.00 0.00
3302-5400 Equipment/Furniture
140,949.00 114,652.48 114,652.48 81.343302-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 26,296.52
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
131,374.00 15,529.88 15,529.88 11.823302-5403 Vehicles 0.00 115,844.12
9,460.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 9,460.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 281,783.00 130,182.36 130,182.36 0.00 151,600.64 46.20
Total Community Services 354,200.00 141,961.72 141,961.72 0.00 212,238.28 40.08
254Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
255
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Community Dev/Planning4101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4101-5400 Equipment/Furniture
7,790.00 6,124.16 6,124.16 78.624101-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 1,665.84
Total Community Dev/Planning 7,790.00 6,124.16 6,124.16 0.00 1,665.84 78.62
255Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
256
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Community Dev/Building4201
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4201-4200 Contract Services
384,669.00 30,291.37 30,291.37 7.874201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 354,377.63
Total Contract Services 384,669.00 30,291.37 30,291.37 0.00 354,377.63 7.87
4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1,320.00 46.22 46.22 3.504201-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 1,273.78
1,670.00 376.08 376.08 22.524201-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,293.92
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,990.00 422.30 422.30 0.00 2,567.70 14.12
4201-4900 Depreciation
3,321.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 3,321.00
Total Depreciation 3,321.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,321.00 0.00
4201-5400 Equipment/Furniture
12,684.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 12,684.00
1,419.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 1,419.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 14,103.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,103.00 0.00
Total Community Dev/Building 405,083.00 30,713.67 30,713.67 0.00 374,369.33 7.58
256Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
257
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Public Works Administration4202
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4202-4200 Contract Services
1,930.00 2,800.00 2,800.00 145.084202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -870.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 0.00
Total Contract Services 1,930.00 2,800.00 2,800.00 0.00 -870.00 145.08
4202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1,877.00 1,877.07 1,877.07 100.004202-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 -0.07
2,200.00 81.20 81.20 3.694202-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 2,118.80
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4,077.00 1,958.27 1,958.27 0.00 2,118.73 48.03
4202-4900 Depreciation
5,050.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 5,050.00
344.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 344.00
Total Depreciation 5,394.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,394.00 0.00
4202-5400 Equipment/Furniture
10,762.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 10,762.00
26,000.00 25,849.92 25,849.92 105.834202-5403 Vehicles 1,664.64 -1,514.56
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 36,762.00 25,849.92 25,849.92 1,664.64 9,247.44 74.85
Total Public Works Administration 48,163.00 30,608.19 30,608.19 1,664.64 15,890.17 67.01
257Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
258
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Building Maintenance4204
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4204-4200 Contract Services
202,494.00 53,077.88 53,077.88 37.494204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 22,832.67 126,583.45
Total Contract Services 202,494.00 53,077.88 53,077.88 22,832.67 126,583.45 37.49
4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
2,190.00 668.59 668.59 30.534204-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 1,521.41
500.00 83.97 83.97 16.794204-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 416.03
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,690.00 752.56 752.56 0.00 1,937.44 27.98
4204-4900 Depreciation
1,348.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 1,348.00
7,935.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 7,935.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4904 Depreciation/Improvements 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 9,283.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,283.00 0.00
4204-5400 Equipment/Furniture
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
1,950.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 1,950.00
39,732.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5403 Vehicles 0.00 39,732.00
25,373.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 25,373.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 67,055.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67,055.00 0.00
4204-5600 Buildings/Improvements
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5602 Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs 0.00 0.00
Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Building Maintenance 281,522.00 53,830.44 53,830.44 22,832.67 204,858.89 27.23
258Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
259
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Equipment Service4206
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4206-4100 Personal Services
164,432.00 108,996.97 108,996.97 66.294206-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 55,435.03
6,000.00 833.98 833.98 13.904206-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 5,166.02
2,343.00 692.22 692.22 29.544206-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 1,650.78
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 0.00
43,684.00 24,690.57 24,690.57 56.524206-4180 Retirement 0.00 18,993.43
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 0.00
48,511.00 30,966.49 30,966.49 63.834206-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 17,544.51
2,392.00 1,609.58 1,609.58 67.294206-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 782.42
13,570.00 9,046.64 9,046.64 66.674206-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 4,523.36
Total Personal Services 280,932.00 176,836.45 176,836.45 0.00 104,095.55 62.95
4206-4200 Contract Services
6,259.00 2,496.50 2,496.50 39.894206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 3,762.50
250.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-4251 Contract Services/Govt 0.00 250.00
Total Contract Services 6,509.00 2,496.50 2,496.50 0.00 4,012.50 38.35
4206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
3,700.00 2,338.39 2,338.39 63.204206-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 1,361.61
3,000.00 1,974.97 1,974.97 65.834206-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 1,025.03
1,300.00 465.60 465.60 35.824206-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 834.40
65,121.00 43,416.00 43,416.00 66.674206-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 21,705.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 73,121.00 48,194.96 48,194.96 0.00 24,926.04 65.91
4206-4900 Depreciation
394.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 394.00
Total Depreciation 394.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 394.00 0.00
4206-5400 Equipment/Furniture
15,737.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 15,737.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 15,737.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,737.00 0.00
259Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
260
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Equipment Service4206
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
Total Equipment Service 376,693.00 227,527.91 227,527.91 0.00 149,165.09 60.40
260Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
261
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Community Resources4601
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4601-4200 Contract Services
3,036.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 3,036.00
Total Contract Services 3,036.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,036.00 0.00
4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1,000.00 469.37 469.37 46.944601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 530.63
500.00 10.00 10.00 2.004601-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 490.00
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1,500.00 479.37 479.37 0.00 1,020.63 31.96
4601-4900 Depreciation
6,934.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 6,934.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 0.00
Total Depreciation 6,934.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,934.00 0.00
4601-5400 Equipment/Furniture
5,951.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 5,951.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.00
9,460.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 9,460.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 15,411.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,411.00 0.00
Total Community Resources 26,881.00 479.37 479.37 0.00 26,401.63 1.78
261Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
262
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Parks6101
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
4,990.00 2,439.19 2,439.19 48.886101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 2,550.81
1,300.00 82.71 82.71 6.366101-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,217.29
Total Materials/Supplies/Other 6,290.00 2,521.90 2,521.90 0.00 3,768.10 40.09
6101-4900 Depreciation
7,868.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 7,868.00
Total Depreciation 7,868.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,868.00 0.00
6101-5400 Equipment/Furniture
39,732.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-5403 Vehicles 0.00 39,732.00
Total Equipment/Furniture 39,732.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,732.00 0.00
Total Parks 53,890.00 2,521.90 2,521.90 0.00 51,368.10 4.68
262Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
263
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Fire Department Tower Demolition8632
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8632-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008632-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Fire Department Tower Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
263Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
264
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Citywide Energy Conservation Upgrades8656
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8656-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008656-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Citywide Energy Conservation Upgrades 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
264Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
265
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Council Chambers Improvements8672
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8672-4200 Contract Services
198,815.00 2,454.25 2,454.25 1.238672-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 196,360.75
Total Council Chambers Improvements 198,815.00 2,454.25 2,454.25 0.00 196,360.75 1.23
265Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
266
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Equipment Replacement Fund715
Community Services Building Improvements8685
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
8685-4200 Contract Services
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008685-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00
Total Community Services Building Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Equipment Replacement Fund 4,865,062.00 1,831,488.75 1,831,488.75 62,542.42 2,971,030.83 38.93
266Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
267
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Gen Fixed Assets Account Group905
Sale Of Fixed Assets1291
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
1291-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001291-4392 Loss On Sale Of Fixed Assets 0.00 0.00
Total Sale Of Fixed Assets 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
267Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
268
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Gen Fixed Assets Account Group905
Infrastructure Purchases4209
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
4209-9000 Infrastructure
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9001 Parking Meters - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9002 Monuments - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
Total Infrastructure 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4209-9100 *** Title Not Found ***
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9101 Roadways, Major - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9102 Roadways, Minor - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9103 Roadways, Residential - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9104 Street Improvements - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4209-9200 *** Title Not Found ***
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9201 Signage - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4209-9300 *** Title Not Found ***
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9301 Storm Drains, Concrete - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9302 Storm Drains, Steel - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9303 Manholes & Ctch Bsns, Strm Drn-Infrstr 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9351 Traffic Signals - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9352 Traffic Flash Signals - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4209-9400 *** Title Not Found ***
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9401 Street Lights - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9451 Sidewalks - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4209-9500 *** Title Not Found ***
268Page:
03/18/2019
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
269
5:34PM
Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report
7/1/2018 through 2/28/2019
Periods: 0 through 8
Gen Fixed Assets Account Group905
Infrastructure Purchases4209
Prct
UsedBalance
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
ExpendituresExpenditures
Adjusted
AppropriationAccount Number
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9501 Curbing - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9551 Alleys - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4209-9700 *** Title Not Found ***
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9701 Sewer Pipelines - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9702 Manholes, Sewer - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9703 Sewer Pump Stations - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9704 Sewer Line Improvements - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4209-9900 *** Title Not Found ***
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9901 Bike Path - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004209-9902 Bikeway Improvements - Infrastructure 0.00 0.00
Total Gen Fixed Assets Account Group 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 70,107,640.00 32,502,004.33 32,502,004.33 46.81 315,728.42 37,289,907.25
269Page:
Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date
Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used
PCH- Aviation Mobility Project (12-143)
001-8143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 94,454.00 - - - 94,454.00 0.00%
115-8143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 34,581.00 - - - 34,581.00 0.00%
145-8143-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
146-8143-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
147-8143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 243,662.00 - - - 243,662.00 0.00%
301-8143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 263,437.00 - - - 263,437.00 0.00%
636,134.00 - - - 636,134.00 0.00%
PCH Traffic Improvements (12-160)
147-8160-4201 Contract Serv/Private 399,922.00 - - - 399,922.00 0.00%
301-8160-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
399,922.00 - - - 399,922.00 0.00%
Beach Drive Green Alley (15-162)
301-8162-4201 187,500.00 - - - 187,500.00 0.00%
187,500.00 - - - 187,500.00 0.00%
Bike Friendly Street Improvements (14-168)
001-8168-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
147-8168-4201 Contract Serv/Private 20,000.00 - - - 20,000.00 0.00%
20,000.00 - - - 20,000.00 0.00%
8th Street- Safe Route to School (14-173)
001-8173-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
115-8173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 325,744.00 - - - 325,744.00 0.00%
122-8173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 67,825.00 - 52,745.10 - 15,079.90 77.77%
150-8173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 354,535.00 - - - 354,535.00 0.00%
301-8173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 308,438.00 - - - 308,438.00 0.00%
1,056,542.00 - 52,745.10 - 1,003,796.90 4.99%
Street Improvements - Various Locations (16-174)
001-8174-4106 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
001-8174-4112 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
001-8174-4189 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
001-8174-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
115-8174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 144,021.00 - 140,806.07 - 3,214.93 97.77%
122-8174-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
145-8174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 274,892.00 5,460.68 7,709.48 - 267,182.52 2.80%
146-8174-4102 Regular Salaries - - 3,130.80 (3,130.80) 0.00%
146-8174-4112 Part Time Temporary - - 100.00 (100.00) 0.00%
146-8174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 799,333.00 - 326,762.00 - 472,571.00 40.88%
147-8174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 766,885.00 - 241,319.43 - 525,565.57 31.47%
148-8174-4201 Contract Serv/Private 282,875.00 - - - 282,875.00 0.00%
301-8174-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
2,268,006.00 5,460.68 719,827.78 - 1,548,178.22 31.74%
CIP Report by Project
2/28/2019
Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date
Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used
CIP Report by Project
2/28/2019
Street Improvement - 21st between PCH/Ardmore (16-184)
150-8184-4201 Contract Serv/Private 98,152.00 - - - 98,152.00 0.00%
98,152.00 - - - 98,152.00 0.00%
ADA Improvements - PCH between 2nd & 21st Street (16-185)
150-8185-4201 Contract Serv/Private 287,260.00 - 504.00 - 286,756.00 0.18%
287,260.00 - 504.00 - 286,756.00 0.18%
Street Improvements - Various Locations (17-186)
001-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
115-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 57,925.00 - - - 57,925.00 0.00%
122-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
145-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 59,000.00 - - - 59,000.00 0.00%
146-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
147-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 89,551.00 - - - 89,551.00 0.00%
148-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 201,231.00 - - - 201,231.00 0.00%
301-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00%
407,707.00 - - - 407,707.00 0.00%
Stamped Concrete Replacement on the Strand (17-187)
301-8187-4201 Contract Serv/Private 140,000.00 - - - 140,000.00 0.00%
140,000.00 - - - 140,000.00 0.00%
Strand Bikeway and Walkway Improv at 35th St (17-188)
147-8188-4201 Contract Serv/Private 115,000.00 115,000.00 0.00%
115,000.00 - - - 115,000.00 0.00%
Sewer Improvements- Various Locations (15-403)
160-8403-4201 Contract Serv/Private 20,377.00 - - - 20,377.00 0.00%
20,377.00 - - - 20,377.00 0.00%
Storm Drain Master Plan (16-415)
161-8415-4201 Contract Serv/Private 21,827.00 - - - 21,827.00 0.00%
21,827.00 - - - 21,827.00 0.00%
Sewer Improvements - Various Locations (17-416)
160-8416-4201 1,260,000.00 - 140,162.32 - 1,119,837.68 11.12%
1,260,000.00 - 140,162.32 - 1,119,837.68 11.12%
Storm Drain Improv - Various Locations (17-417)
161-8417-4201 645,090.00 - - - 645,090.00 0.00%
645,090.00 - - - 645,090.00 0.00%
Citywide Parks Master Plan (13-538)
001-8538-4201 Contract Serv/Private 42,065.00 - - - 42,065.00 0.00%
125-8538-4102 Regular Salaries 173,410.00 - - - 173,410.00 0.00%
215,475.00 - - - 215,475.00 0.00%
Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date
Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used
CIP Report by Project
2/28/2019
Stormwater/Urban Runoff Diversion Project (16-542)
150-8542-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,762,387.00 - 16,060.55 - 3,746,326.45 0.43%
301-8542-4201 Contract Serv/Private 421,618.00 - 2,528.05 - 419,089.95 0.60%
4,184,005.00 - 18,588.60 - 4,165,416.40 0.60%
Feasibility, Greenbelt Path (17-544)
301-8544-4201 Contract Serv/Private 10,000.00 - - - 10,000.00 0.00%
10,000.00 - - - 10,000.00 0.00%
Clark Stadium Bleachers (17-545)
125-8545-4201 Contract Serv/Private 30,000.00 - - - 30,000.00 0.00%
30,000.00 - - - 30,000.00 0.00%
Citywide Park Improvements (17-546)
125-8546-4201 Contract Serv/Private 56,359.00 - 33,511.08 16,530.82 6,317.10 88.79%
56,359.00 - 33,511.08 16,530.82 6,317.10 88.79%
Downtown Strategic Plan (12-609)
001-8609-4201 Contract Serv/Private 103,610.00 - - 16,264.83 87,345.17 15.70%
301-8609-4201 Contract Serv/Private 559,055.00 - - - 559,055.00 0.00%
662,665.00 - - 16,264.83 646,400.17 2.45%
Police Facility Improvements (14-614)
001-8614-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2,972.00 - 2,880.30 - 91.70 96.91%
301-8614-4201 Contract Serv/Private 95,280.00 - 35,076.41 9,756.52 50,447.07 47.05%
98,252.00 - 37,956.71 9,756.52 50,538.77 48.56%
City Yard Renovation (15-615)
001-8615-4201 Contract Serv/Private 56,102.00 225.00 4,106.25 - 51,995.75 7.32%
301-8615-4201 Contract Serv/Private 173,142.00 - 2,212.00 - 170,930.00 1.28%
229,244.00 225.00 6,318.25 - 222,925.75 2.76%
Municipal Pier Structural Assessment & Repairs (16-629)
122-8629-4201 Contract Serv/Private 177,380.00 - - - 177,380.00 0.00%
191-8629-4201 Contract Serv/Private 240,000.00 - - - 240,000.00 0.00%
417,380.00 - - - 417,380.00 0.00%
Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date
Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used
CIP Report by Project
2/28/2019
Community Center Gen Improvements (15-650)
001-8650-4201 Contract Serv/Private 261,640.00 - 114,045.18 2,700.00 144,894.82 44.62%
301-8650-4201 Contract Serv/Private 149,039.00 - 535.32 3,182.00 145,321.68 2.49%
410,679.00 - 114,580.50 5,882.00 290,216.50 47.11%
Municipal Pier Structural Repairs Phase 3 (15-660)
122-8660-4201 Contract Serv/Private 275,473.00 - - - 275,473.00 0.00%
301-8660-4201 Contract Serv/Private 259,711.00 - - - 259,711.00 0.00%
535,184.00 - - - 535,184.00 0.00%
Library Community Needs Assessment (15-668)
150-8668-4201 Contract Serv/Private 42,522.00 - - - 42,522.00 0.00%
42,522.00 - - - 42,522.00 0.00%
City Park Restroom Renovations (15-669)
301-8669-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,055,994.00 - 54,312.00 - 1,001,682.00 5.14%
1,055,994.00 - 54,312.00 - 1,001,682.00 5.14%
Tree Well Grates (15-670)
301-8670-4201 Contract Serv/Private 67,220.00 - 16,151.57 - 51,068.43 24.03%
67,220.00 - 16,151.57 - 51,068.43 24.03%
Council Chambers Improvements (15-672)
001-8672-4201 Contract Serv/Private 106,209.00 - - - 106,209.00 0.00%
715-8672-4201 Contract Serv/Private 198,815.00 - 2,454.25 - 196,360.75 1.23%
305,024.00 - 2,454.25 - 302,569.75 0.80%
Breakroom Improvements City Hall/Yard (16-673)
301-8673-4201 Contract Serv/Private 11,227.00 54,477.00 54,811.05 - (43,584.05) 488.21%
11,227.00 54,477.00 54,811.05 - (43,584.05) 488.21%
Police Dept Substation Facility Improvement (16-674)
001-8674-4201 Contract Serv/Private 5,755.00 - 902.81 - 4,852.19 15.69%
5,755.00 - 902.81 - 4,852.19 15.69%
Pier Plaza Lamp Post Replacement (16-675)
301-8675-4201 Contract Serv/Private 71,922.00 - - - 71,922.00 0.00%
71,922.00 - - - 71,922.00 0.00%
Electrical Vehicle and Bicycle Transportation (16-682)
150-8682-4201 Contract Serv/Private 162,977.00 32,021.47 39,139.87 - 123,837.13 24.02%
301-8682-4201 Contract Serv/Private 47,186.00 - - - 47,186.00 0.00%
210,163.00 32,021.47 39,139.87 - 171,023.13 18.62%
Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date
Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used
CIP Report by Project
2/28/2019
Bard Street Closure (17-683)
001-8683-4201 Contract Serv/Private 57,989.00 - 350.00 54,477.00 3,162.00 94.55%
301-8683-4201 Contract Serv/Private 55,000.00 - 10,913.58 - 44,086.42 19.84%
112,989.00 - 11,263.58 54,477.00 47,248.42 58.18%
Emergency Operations Center Renovations (17-684)
301-8684-4201 Contract Serv/Private 193,500.00 - - - 193,500.00 0.00%
193,500.00 - - - 193,500.00 0.00%
ADA Improvements - Various Locations (17-687)
140-8687-4201 Contract Serv/Private 150,000.00 - - - 150,000.00 0.00%
150,000.00 - - - 150,000.00 0.00%
Clark Building Renovations (17-689)
301-8689-4201 Contract Serv/Private 423,554.00 - - - 423,554.00 0.00%
423,554.00 - - - 423,554.00 0.00%
Citywide Maintenance Enhancement/Clean-Up (17-690)
001-8690-4112 Part Time Temporary - - 1,746.00 - (1,746.00) 0.00%
001-8690-4189 Part Time Temporary Medicare Benefits - - - - - 0.00%
- - 1,746.00 - (1,746.00) 0.00%
ADA Improvements - Various Locations (18-691)
140-8691-4201 Contract Serv/Private 120,000.00 - - - 120,000.00 0.00%
120,000.00 - - - 120,000.00 0.00%
14th Street Beach Restroom Rehab (18-692)
160-8692-4201 Contract Serv/Private 110,000.00 - - - 110,000.00 0.00%
110,000.00 - - - 110,000.00 0.00%
Community Theater Needs Assessment
301-8693-4201 Contract Serv/Private 30,000.00 - - - 30,000.00 0.00%
30,000.00 - - - 30,000.00 0.00%
Grand Total 17,322,630.00 92,184.15 1,304,975.47 102,911.17 15,914,743.36 8.13%
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0189
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT
(City Treasurer Karen Nowicki)
Recommended Action:
City Treasurer recommends that the City Council receive and file the February 2019 City Treasurer’s
Report and Cash Balance Report.
Summary:
Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach’s adopted investment
policy.
Attached is a report of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of February 2019.This is the most
current available investment information.
Attachments:
1.City Treasurer’s Report
2.Cash Balance Report
Respectfully Submitted by: Karen Nowicki, City Treasurer
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
INSTITUTIONS
RATE YIELD
DATE OF DATE OF ORIGINAL MARKET COST/MARKET FACE/PAR OF TO
INVESTMENT TYPE/INSTITUTION CUSIP #BOOK VALUE INVESTMENT MATURITY COST VALUE DIFFERENCE VALUE INTEREST MATURITY
POOLED INVESTMENTS
LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund)44,729.04$ $44,729.04 2.392%
LACPIF (Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Funds)26,226,269.76$ $26,226,269.76 2.180%Rate for January *
Pooled Investments % of Total Investment 74.256%$26,270,998.80
AGENCIES
Federal Home Loan Mortgage 3137EADK2 $499,094.84 8/1/2014 8/1/2019 $500,000.00 $497,365.00 ($2,635.00)$500,000.00 1.250%1.260%
Agencies % of Total Investment 1.411%$499,094.84
NEGOTIABLE CDS
Sallie Mae Bank 795450UB9 $248,000.00 10/22/2014 10/22/2019 $248,000.00 $247,154.37 ($845.63)$248,000.00 2.160%2.160%
American Express Bank 02587CCC2 $247,000.00 10/23/2014 10/23/2019 $247,000.00 $246,234.15 ($765.85)$247,000.00 2.210%2.210%
Peoples UTD Bank 71270QLM6 $247,000.00 01/21/2015 01/21/2020 $247,000.00 $245,002.01 ($1,997.99)$247,000.00 1.870%1.870%
Private Bank and Trust 74267GUU9 $248,000.00 01/23/2015 01/23/2020 $248,000.00 $246,093.17 ($1,906.83)$248,000.00 1.910%1.910%
Capital One Bank 140420SH4 $248,000.00 06/17/2015 06/17/2020 $248,000.00 $245,912.72 ($2,087.28)$248,000.00 2.170%2.170%
Discover Bank 254672QE1 $248,000.00 06/17/2015 06/17/2020 $248,000.00 $245,753.31 ($2,246.69)$248,000.00 2.120%2.120%
Capital One Nat'l Assn 14042E5U08 $246,000.00 08/19/2015 08/19/2020 $246,000.00 $244,713.75 ($1,286.25)$246,000.00 2.410%2.410%
Everbank Jacksonville 29976DA59 $245,000.00 08/28/2015 08/28/2020 $245,000.00 $242,508.25 ($2,491.75)$245,000.00 2.070%2.070%
American Express Centurion 02587DF86 $247,000.00 11/04/2015 11/04/2020 $247,000.00 $245,167.55 ($1,832.45)$247,000.00 2.270%2.270%
Synchrony Bank 87164YKW3 $247,000.00 11/20/2015 11/20/2020 $247,000.00 $244,910.61 ($2,089.39)$247,000.00 2.220%2.220%
Comenity Capital Bank 20033ANX0 $249,000.00 01/19/2016 01/19/2021 $249,000.00 $245,494.84 ($3,505.16)$249,000.00 1.930%1.930%
EnerBank USA 29266NX51 $247,000.00 01/28/2016 01/28/2021 $247,000.00 $243,589.76 ($3,410.24)$247,000.00 1.930%1.930%
World Foremost Bank Sydney 981571CQ3 $200,000.00 06/09/2016 06/09/2021 $200,000.00 $195,971.11 ($4,028.89)$200,000.00 1.730%1.730%
Wells Fargo Bank NA Siouxfall 9497485W3 $249,000.00 06/17/2016 06/17/2021 $249,000.00 $244,218.79 ($4,781.21)$249,000.00 1.780%1.780%
First Bank of Puerto Rico 33767AZY09 $248,000.00 08/26/2016 08/26/2021 $248,000.00 $241,077.70 ($6,922.30)$248,000.00 1.490%1.490%
Beneficial Mutual Savings 08173QBR6 $248,000.00 09/12/2016 09/12/2021 $248,000.00 $241,311.74 ($6,688.26)$248,000.00 1.540%1.540%
Countryside Federal Credit Union 22239MAL2 $249,000.00 10/18/2016 10/18/2021 $249,000.00 $242,960.77 ($6,039.23)$249,000.00 1.690%1.690%
Venture Bank 92326XDE8 $249,000.00 12/02/2016 09/02/2021 $249,000.00 $242,328.83 ($6,671.17)$249,000.00 1.540%1.540%
Stearns Bank NA 857894SK6 $242,000.00 01/13/2017 01/13/2022 $242,000.00 $238,447.12 ($3,552.88)$242,000.00 2.080%2.080%
East Boston Savings Bank 27113PBM2 $248,000.00 01/20/2017 01/20/2022 $248,000.00 $244,000.32 ($3,999.68)$248,000.00 2.030%2.030%
Goldman Sachs Bank 38148PKT3 $246,000.00 06/14/2017 06/14/2022 $246,000.00 $244,331.89 ($1,668.11)$246,000.00 2.370%2.370%
Barclays Bank 06740KKD8 $246,647.40 07/22/2017 07/12/2022 $247,000.00 $244,093.71 ($2,906.29)$247,000.00 2.200%2.230%
Marlin Business Bank 57116APQ5 $249,000.00 08/22/2017 08/23/2022 $249,000.00 $244,714.27 ($4,285.73)$249,000.00 2.090%2.090%
Merrick Bank South Jordan 59013JC49 $249,000.00 10/19/2017 10/20/2022 $249,000.00 $244,983.70 ($4,016.30)$249,000.00 2.130%2.130%
Northfield Bank 66612ABX5 $247,000.00 10/24/2017 10/25/2022 $247,000.00 $243,448.55 ($3,551.45)$247,000.00 2.180%2.180%
Morgan Stanley Bank 61747MH95 $249,000.00 02/01/2018 02/01/2023 $249,000.00 $246,883.78 ($2,116.22)$249,000.00 2.640%2.640%
Allegiance Bank 01748DBA3 $246,000.00 02/07/2018 02/07/2023 $246,000.00 $249,434.90 $3,434.90 $246,000.00 2.600%2.600%
CitiBank NA 17312QN39 $245,000.00 06/15/2018 06/15/2023 $245,000.00 $251,954.49 $6,954.49 $245,000.00 3.160%3.160%
BMW Bank North America 05580AMX9 $245,000.00 06/15/2018 06/15/2023 $245,000.00 $251,954.49 $6,954.49 $245,000.00 3.160%3.160%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China 45581EAX9 $249,000.00 08/17/2018 06/30/2023 $249,000.00 $256,676.12 $7,676.12 $249,000.00 3.200%3.200%
Bank Midwest Spirit Lake 063615BM9 $244,438.84 09/17/2018 09/15/2023 $245,000.00 $250,726.59 $5,726.59 $245,000.00 3.100%3.030%
UBS Bank 90348JEJ5 $249,000.00 10/17/2018 10/17/2023 $249,000.00 $257,701.68 $8,701.68 $249,000.00 3.240%3.240%
Spring Bank 849430AY9 $249,000.00 10/24/2018 10/24/2023 $249,000.00 $256,629.89 $7,629.89 $249,000.00 3.150%3.150%
Morgan Stanley Private Bank 61760AUJ6 $246,000.00 01/17/2019 01/17/2024 $246,000.00 $252,659.79 $6,659.79 $246,000.00 3.070%3.070%
Country Bank New York 22230PBY5 $249,000.00 01/25/2019 01/25/2024 $249,000.00 $254,068.17 $5,068.17 $249,000.00 2.940%2.940%
Negotiable CD % of Total Investment 24.334%$8,609,086.24
TOTAL ALL INVESTMENTS 35,379,179.88$ $9,110,000.00 $9,080,477.89 ($29,522.11)$35,380,998.80
Average Rate of Interest 2.268%
Average Yield to Maturity 2.267%
In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient
investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months.
Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy.
*February rate publishes the first week of April.
APPROVED: KAREN NOWICKI, CITY TREASURER
TREASURER'S REPORT
FEBRUARY 2019
GENERAL ACCOUNT
FUND 1/31/2019 2/28/2019
NUMBER FUND NAME BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS CHECKS ADJUSTMENTS BALANCE
001 GENERAL $10,050,827.72 $2,820,335.37 ($1,878,169.67)($847,096.78)($211,877.89)$9,934,018.75
105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING $36,799.42 $47,642.52 ($4,725.36)($16,846.79)(1,045.18)$61,824.61
115 STATE GAS TAX $254,073.40 $55,690.00 ($40,235.54)$269,527.86
117 AB939 $69,166.09 $7,608.49 ($701.88)(108.47)$75,964.23
121 PROP A OPEN SPACE $8,566.00 ($1,713.00)$6,853.00
122 TYCO $1,031,284.63 $40,919.79 ($15,290.28)$1,056,914.14
125 PARK REC FAC TAX $348,903.58 $743.92 $349,647.50
135 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $4,722.46 ($182.34)$4,540.12
136 LOWER PIER ADMIN EXPENSE ($1,309.00)$1,309.00 $0.00
137 MYRTLE DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $1,487.52 ($436.76)$1,050.76
138 LOMA DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $10,615.58 ($454.38)$10,161.20
139 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $4,373.49 ($149.01)$4,224.48
140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT $0.00 $0.00
145 PROPOSITION A $1,556,974.90 $36,948.31 $3,066.54 ($14,661.23)(22.74)$1,582,305.78
146 PROPOSITION C $1,047,492.63 $30,373.64 $2,298.19 $1,080,164.46
147 MEASURE R $909,439.84 $22,778.42 $1,987.65 $934,205.91
148 MEASURE M $374,689.36 $25,869.66 $854.06 $401,413.08
150 GRANTS $972,767.19 ($32,021.47)$940,745.72
152 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT $33,246.38 ($324.34)(24.83)$32,897.21
153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES $284,817.97 $6,485.44 $620.75 ($169.64)$291,754.52
160 SEWER MAINTENANCE $6,303,697.44 $106,473.88 $1,532.30 ($51,945.49)(778.07)$6,358,980.06
161 STORM DRAIN FUND $1,087,693.36 $47,151.18 ($332.35)(791.97)$1,133,720.22
170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE $533,904.70 $1,138.38 $535,043.08
180 FIRE PROTECTION $63,025.96 $356.54 $128.09 ($3,306.56)$60,204.03
190 RTI UNDERSEA CABLE $334,921.76 $714.11 $335,635.87
191 RTI UNDERSEA CABLE TIDELANDS $243,564.72 $519.32 $244,084.04
201 2015 LEASE REVENUE BONDS $0.00 $0.00
301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $7,277,134.80 $15,399.92 ($54,477.00)$7,238,057.72
609 BAYVIEW DRIVE REDEMPTION $99,960.34 $6,882.28 $227.79 $107,070.41
610 LOWER PIER DISTRICT REDEMPTION $2,999.31 $6.40 $3,005.71
611 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT REDEMPTION $52,908.54 $2,765.55 $118.71 $55,792.80
612 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESERVE $4,405.51 $9.39 $4,414.90
617 MYRTLE AVE ASSESSMENT $38,372.37 $1,018.50 $83.99 $39,474.86
618 LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT $76,057.17 $1,192.49 $164.71 $77,414.37
619 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT RESERVE $14,465.44 $30.84 $14,496.28
705 INSURANCE $6,791,941.36 $362,440.49 (20,889.29)(1,015.17)$7,132,477.39
715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $5,169,104.98 $5,346.87 $102,341.50 ($40,572.59)($2,018.51)$5,234,202.25
TOTAL GENERAL ACCOUNT $45,093,096.92 $3,218,687.75 ($1,399,495.33)($1,082,319.19)($217,682.83)$45,612,287.32
``BALANCE BALANCE
ACCOUNTS 1/31/2019 DEPOSITS CHARGES 2/28/2019
PAYROLL $36,233.33 $1,453,733.63 ($1,438,441.55)$51,525.41
CABLE TV DEPOSIT $16,603.81 $16,603.81
$52,837.14 $1,453,733.63 ($1,438,441.55)$68,129.22
TOTAL ALL ACCOUNTS $45,680,416.54
BANK BALANCES
INVESTMENTS GENERAL $10,926,656.49
$35,379,179.88 TRUST ACCOUNTS $68,129.22
$10,994,785.71
OUTSTANDING CHECKS ($693,549.05)
INTEREST COLLECTED $10,301,236.66
TO DATE FOR FY 18/19 INVESTMENTS $35,379,179.88
$441,098.86 BALANCE $45,680,416.54
APPROVED : KAREN NOWICKI, CITY TREASURER
CASH BALANCE REPORT
FEBRUARY 2019
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0190
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2018
CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS
(City Treasurer Karen Nowicki)
Recommended Action:
City Treasurer recommends that the City Council approve cancellation of certain checks.
Summary:
Please ratify the following request for cancellation of the check(s) listed below:
#89044 - 05/24/2018 - $463.45 - Splash Waterpark
Vendor did not receive check.
#91252 - 02/26/2019 - $8,264.43 - Exxon Mobil Business Fleet
Duplicate payment.
Respectfully Submitted by: Karen Nowicki, City Treasurer
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0185
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
PROJECT STATUS REPORT AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 2019
(Acting Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Project Status Report as of February 28,
2019.
Analysis:
Key statistics for the 18-19 CIP projects are provided below.
Number of Projects by Phase # of Projects
Study/Conceptual Planning 10
Preliminary Design 7
Final Engineering Design 6
Project Approvals/ Bidding 4
Construction 9
Closeout 3
Total Projects 39
Number of Projects by Completion Timeline # of Projects
1 - Complete by end of 18/19 10
2 - Complete in FY 19/20 12
3 - 3 year to completion 8
4 - 5 year to completion 3
On Hold and/or Candidate for Removal 3
Project Complete 3
Total Projects 39
Number of Projects by Category # of Projects
Street & Highway Improvements 11
Sewer & Storm Drain Improvements 2
Park Improvements 5
Public Building & Ground Improvements 21
Total Projects 39
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0185
Number of Projects by Category # of Projects
Street & Highway Improvements 11
Sewer & Storm Drain Improvements 2
Park Improvements 5
Public Building & Ground Improvements 21
Total Projects 39
Number of Projects by Manager Lead Support Total
Lucho Rodriguez 8 6 14
Reed Salan 4 1 5
Fabio Macias 5 0 5
Ells Freeman 12 2 14
Kristy Morris 6 2 8
Leeanne Singleton 2 1 3
Kelly Orta 2 1 3
Total Projects 39
# of Projects
Attachments:
1.Project Status Report as of February 28, 2019
2.2018-19 Capital Improvement Program
Respectfully Submitted by: Lucho Rodriguez, P.E., Acting Public Works Director
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
City of Hermosa Beach
Updated 3.15.19 FY 2018-19 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Blue indicates a change from prior status report.
Grey indicates project complete. Project CategoryCIP No.Project Name Project Budget Project Manager
Study/Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/ BiddingConstructionCloseoutTentative Date to Next
Milestone/ Update
Estimated Project Completion
Date Current Project Status Project Description
SH 12-143 PCH Mobility Improvement Project (Previously named
"PCH/Aviation Mobility Improvements")
636,134$ Lucho
Rodriguez
X TBD TBD
In January 2019, staff submitted applications to the South Bay Cities Council of
Governments and LA Metro for Measure R and Measure M funding to support safety and
mobility project elements for the PCH corridor to be implemented in coordination with the
Caltrans Capital Maintenance Project to repave the entire PCH corridor scheduled for
construction in 2022. In March 2019, staff met with COG, Metro, and Caltrans staff to
coordinate project elements and funding opportunities with direction to refine the project
applications to provide the full scope of the project and the various funding sources that
may be eligible for different project elements.
This project will improve the Pacific Coast Highway corridor mobility’s (vehicular movement)
aspect for efficiency. Improvements include elements of a “Complete Street” which include
coastal sensitive drought-tolerant landscaped raised center medians to increase driver
safety; enhanced safety pedestrian crosswalk features; new street furniture & bus shelters
where applicable incorporating transit kiosks; ADA accessibility. These improvements will
be coordinated as part of the Caltrans CAPM $60M pavement resurfacing project
scheduled to start in 2022.
SH 12-160 PCH Traffic Improvements 399,922$ Reed Salan
X Begin Construction -
4/01/19 6/30/19
Contractor to start construction 4/01/19. Traffic signal components have a long lead time
which may extend the duration of the installation of those items. Concrete work to be
completed first.
The work scope for this project will install pedestrian signal, crosswalks and ADA curb
ramps improvements at the intersections of PCH and Pier Avenue and PCH and Aviation
Boulevard including California Truck Turn improvements at this intersection.
SH 15-162 Green Alley and Beach Quality Improvement Project
(Previously named "Beach Drive Green Alley")
187,500$ Kristy Morris
X TBD TBD
This project is scheduled for further review in mid 2019 to further develop and redefine the
work scope.
The project will design and implement LID and green infrastructure projects such as green
alleys and trash/debris exclusion devices to mitigate storm water and dry-weather run-off
impacts on the City’s beaches.
SH 14-168 Bike Friendly Street Improvements (Previously named
"Valley Drive Sharrows", "Bike Friendly Routes on 22nd
St./Monterey Blvd. & Longfellow Ave.)
20,000$ Leeanne
Singleton X
Prepare preliminary
design for all identified
corridors - 3/31/19
6/30/2019
Preliminary design of proposed bike facilities for 27th Street, Ardmore Avenue, Valley Drive,
and Pier Avenue consistent with Bicycle Master Plan and General Plan is underway.
This project proposes the selection and implementation of Hermosa Beach prioritized
project(s) from the South Bay Bicycle Master Plan.
SH 14-173 8th Street - Safe Route to School 1,056,542$ Reed Salan
X Bid Opening - 4/04/19 7/30/2019
Final design complete and the advertising for construction bids began on 3/14/19. Bid
Opening 4/4/19.
The project consists of improvements that will improve walkability and provide safe
pedestrian access on 8th Street from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue. Improvements
include continuous sidewalk; ADA curb access ramps on 8th Street; drainage
improvements; installing crosswalks on both sides of 8th Street at intersections of:
Manhattan Avenue, Monterey Blvd, Loma Drive, Cypress Avenue, Bard Street and Valley
Drive.
SH 16-174 Annual Street Improvements - Various Locations 2,268,006$ Lucho
Rodriguez X
Complete pavement
portion - 3/31/19
Dutatherm 5-30-19
6/31/2019
New pavement striping to begin 3/25/19. Final Elements of Project Being installed (Bus
Shelter), Benches. Duratherm project to begin after striping in April, 2019.
This project includes for annual slurry seal of City streets to maintain the pavement
condition. The selected streets will be prioritized based on recommendations in the current
Pavement Management Plan. Paving of Hermosa Avenue from 10th to 26th Street is the
project identified for this CIP.
SH 17-186 Annual Street Improvements - Various Locations 407,707$ Lucho
Rodriguez X
Request Design Quotes
from On-Call
Consultants - 3/31/19
6/30/2020
Design services to be solicited for via on-call consultants in mid-March 2019 (est). The
identified streets will be the streets that have sewer improvements that are currently under
design and will be under construction in FY 19-20.
This project includes for annual slurry seal of City streets to maintain the pavement
condition. The selected streets will be prioritized based on recommendations in the current
Pavement Management Plan.
SH 16-184 Pacific Coast Highway Sidewalk Improvements 98,152$ Reed Salan
X Begin Construction -
4/01/19 6/30/19
Notice to Proceed with Construction given to contractor for 4/1/19.This project proposes sidewalk improvements along PCH as needed to mitigate possible
trip hazards. The project will involve concrete grinding and repair and replacement of
sidewalk sections at various locations identified by the City Consultant and approved by
Caltrans. The costs are to be reimbursed by Caltrans.
SH 16-185 ADA Improvements on PCH between 2nd Street and 21st
Street
287,260$ Reed Salan
X Begin Construction -
4/01/19 6/30/19
Notice to Proceed with Construction given to contractor for 4/1/19.This project proposes ADA Curb Ramp improvements along PCH to comply with ADA
requirements. The project will involve construction and reconstruction of ADA curb ramps at
various intersections. The funding for this project is provided by Caltrans.
SH 17-187 Stamped Concrete Replacement on the Strand 140,000$ Lucho
Rodriguez X Under Construction 3/31/2019
Final stretch of colored concrete banding to be complete week of 3/18/19.This project proposes to replace the stamped concrete on the Strand bikeway/walkway
between 10th Street and 15th Street. The existing stamped concrete suffers from damage
due to age, weather, and exposure to the elements of a marine environment.
SH 17-188 Strand Bikeway and Walkway Improvements at 35th Street 115,000$ Lucho
Rodriguez
X
Awaiting Grant
Application Notification -
3/31/19
TBD
Submitted grant to Caltrans for Adaptation Planning Grant November 2018. Awaiting
decision on grant application to confirm next steps to initiate design.
This project would provide for improved accessibility & connectivity for bicyclists travelling
between the Cities of Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach via The Strand at 35th Street.
The project will also consider the addition of a dedicated ADA path to provide greater ADA
accessibility to The Strand.
Categories:
SH = Steet/Highway
SSD = Sewer/Storm Drain
PI = Parks
PBG = Public Building and Ground 1 of 4
City of Hermosa Beach
Updated 3.15.19 FY 2018-19 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Blue indicates a change from prior status report.
Grey indicates project complete. Project CategoryCIP No.Project Name Project Budget Project Manager
Study/Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/ BiddingConstructionCloseoutTentative Date to Next
Milestone/ Update
Estimated Project Completion
Date Current Project Status Project Description
SSD 17-416 Annual Sewer Improvements - Various Locations 1,260,000$ Lucho
Rodriguez X Complete Design -
3/31/19 12/31/2019 Phase 2 Plans and construction documents completion by 3/31/19. Locations as per 2017
Sanitary Sewer Master Plan.
Sewer System Repairs per the 2017 Sewer Master Plan Recommendations.
SSD 17-417 Annual Storm Drain Improvements - Various Locations 645,090$ Lucho
Rodriguez X RFP for Design -
4/15/19 12/31/2019
In contact with prospective designers from previously approved On-Call Contracts.Storm drain improvements throughout the City. Locations will be identified and prioritized
per the recently adopted Storm Drain Master Plan. Projects will address deficiencies,
ponding, and repairs as well as locations for new storm drains.
PI 13-538 Citywide Park Master Plan 215,475$ Leeanne
Singleton
X
Finalize Scope of Work
and Issue Request for
Proposals - TBD
TBD
RFP currently on hold to allow for coordination with LA County Parks Measure A funding
and allocation plan criteria.
The City is seeking to prepare a Parks Master Plan that achieves the following goals: •
Engages the community and local recreational organizations in a dialogue about parks and
open space resources in Hermosa Beach; • Identifies the current demand/utilization and the
future/evolving parks and recreational facility needs for the Hermosa Beach community; •
Leverages the vision and goals of the recently adopted General Plan and the Community
Decision-Making Tool;
• Identifies an appropriate balance between organized and informal recreational activities at
the City’s parks and open spaces; • Serves as a dynamic useful planning and
implementation document that enjoys broad community and political support; • Provides a
comprehensive strategy to maintain, rehabilitate and improve the City’s network of parks,
facilities, and open space assets, including current unfunded park and recreational
opportunities; • Evaluates the effective use of the City’s financial and physical resources
and opportunities to fund implementation of the recommendations in the Master Plan.
PI 16-542 Storm water/Urban Run-Off Diversion Project 4,184,005$ Kristy Morris
X Presenting to City
Council - 3/26/19 TBD
Exploring alternative locations. Council subcommittee formed with Redondo Beach to
discuss potential project locations within Redondo Beach jurisdiction. Presenting to City
Council on 3/26/19 for next steps.
This is a joint project between the Beach Cities Watershed Management Group member
agencies. Hermosa Beach’s portion of the matching funds is 10%, based on the
contributing tributary to the project.
PI 17-544 Feasibility, Greenbelt Path 10,000$ Lucho
Rodriguez X TBD TBD
This project is on hold following opinion provided by City Attorney. Determine the feasibility of installing decomposed granite on the Greenbelt to provide a
firm, natural looking and permeable path that increases accessibility for the disabled and
boosts accessibility
for all.
PI 17-545 Clark Stadium Bleachers 30,000$ Ells Freeman
X TBD TBD
Requires field review to refine scope of work before engaging architect or designer. The purpose of this project is to improve the bleachers at the Clark Stadium, and to
construct new stairs for access to the bleachers that comply with ADA standards. This work
will also address the damages on the concrete pathway at the west entrance of the park.
The damages are due to invasive tree roots.
PBG 12-609 Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation 662,665$ Fabio Macias
X
Installation of Security
Lighting and Sample
Pier Plaza Light
Posts/Fixtures - 6/30/19
6/30/2019
Sample fixtures and sample string lights for Pier Plaza have been ordered and will be
installed in early April.
This project will provide for improved lighting, safety and cleanliness at Parking Lots A & B,
Beach Drive between 11th and 13th Streets and Pier Plaza.
PBG 14-614 Police Facilities Improvements 98,252$ Ells Freeman
X
Complete Painting and
Flooring installation -
3/31/2019
3/31/2019
Scheduling the floor to be completed by the end of this month.This project involves installation of new updated locks on secured
doors in the police department; includes key fobs and keypad access at all doors. Building
of office space and storage on PD ramp; includes installing new flooring, paint, and updated
HVAC system, and furniture. Renovation of the jail Livescan, booking, and kitchen area;
requires customized cabinets to comply with jail standards, painting, and additional
furniture.
PBG 15-615 City Yard Renovation 229,244$ Kristy Morris
X
Completion and Review
of Remediation Plan by
LA County - 3/31/19
6/30/2021
Design of 50% plans have been completed. Will Present update to Council at future City
Council meeting.
The scope of work for FY 2018/19 will consist of completing the Human Health Risk
Assessment and site remediation of the City Yard site and developing design and
construction documents for the new City Yard facility. (Note: $2,156,000 has been reserved
for construction and contingency in the Capital Improvement Fund for this project.)
PBG 16-629 Municipal Pier Structural Assessment and Repairs 417,380$ Fabio Macias
X Submission of Coastal
Commission Permit 6/30/2020
Plans and specs 100% complete. Reviewing for preparation of application for Coastal
Commission permit to be combined effort with CIP 15-650 Pier Electrical Repairs project.
This project will preparation of a pier structural assessment report to develop a multi-year
program for repairs of structural supporting elements of the municipal pier.
Categories:
SH = Steet/Highway
SSD = Sewer/Storm Drain
PI = Parks
PBG = Public Building and Ground 2 of 4
City of Hermosa Beach
Updated 3.15.19 FY 2018-19 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Blue indicates a change from prior status report.
Grey indicates project complete. Project CategoryCIP No.Project Name Project Budget Project Manager
Study/Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/ BiddingConstructionCloseoutTentative Date to Next
Milestone/ Update
Estimated Project Completion
Date Current Project Status Project Description
PBG 15-650 Community Center General Improvements 410,679$ Ells Freeman X Project Closeout 6/30/2019 Project Complete.This project will include improvements to the Community Center including, repainting
windows, doors, and interior & exterior surface of the building.
PBG 15-660 Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs 535,184$ Fabio Macias
X Submission of Coastal
Commission Permit 6/30/2020
Design review 90% complete. Specs being modified for construction mitigation measures.
Reviewing for preparation of application for Coastal Commission permit to be combined
effort with CIP 16-629 Pier Structural Assessment project.
The pier electrical repairs will involve the replacement of existing conduit, junction boxes,
connections and wiring so that the lights can be functional. The project will also eliminate
the service box towards the end of the pier and create a new service connection point for
the foghorn at the end of the pier.
PBG 15-669 City Park Restroom Renovations (Previously named 'Fort
Lots-O-Fun and Seaview Parkette Restrooms'; combined
with 'South Park Restroom Renovations', and 'Clark Field
Restroom Improvements')
1,055,994$ Kristy Morris
X
Approval of Coastal
Commission Documents
- TBD
6/30/2020
Designs complete and construction documents reviewed. Construction bid documents
being prepared. Coastal Develop Permit Waivers for South Park and Clark Field approved
by the Coastal Commission.
This project consists of design and construction of ADA compliant restrooms at four parks
(Fort Lots-O-Fun, Seaview Parkette, South Park, Clark Field) and renovation of the current
restrooms at South Park.
PBG 15-670 Tree Well Grates 67,220$ Ells Freeman X Custom Grates in
Production 5/31/19 Tree grates for Hermosa Avenue between 10th and 14th Street currently being fabricated
and are expected to arrive in Early May, 2019
This Project will install iron tree grates in existing tree wells on Pier Plaza and Hermosa
Avenue.
PBG 15-672 Council Chamber Improvements 305,024$ Ells Freeman
X Final Bid Documents -
4/30/19 12/31/2019
Reviewing construction documents with consultant to expedite implementation of
equipment upgrade.
Replacement of audio/visual equipment in the Council Chambers. Project will replace
audio visual equipment in the Council Chambers. Additional enhancements may be
considered that would increase the scope and budget of the project by as much as $45,000
depending on the equipment selected.
PBG 15-675 Pier Plaza Lamp Post Replacement 71,922$ Kristy Morris
X
Installation of Sample
Fixtures and Posts -
3/31/19
6/30/2019
This project has been combined as part of CIP 12-609 Downtown Strategic Plan
Implementation. Demonstration poles and fixtures has been ordered.
The existing 22 light poles and fixtures on Pier Plaza were installed in 1996 and are in
disrepair. They will be replaced with poles and LED lights and fixtures that reflect the City's
architecture and commitment to public safety.
PBG 16-682 Lot D Electrical Vehicle and Bicycle Transportation
Infrastructure Expansion
210,163$ Kristy Morris
X
Presentation of 90%
Design Plans to
Commission and
Council
6-30-20
90% project documents under plan check and once complete to be presented to Pub
Works Comm in mid 2019. 90% design plans to be presented to City Council.
The project will install a rapid electric vehicle charging station, expand bicycle parking and
capture and treat storm water run-off from road and parking surfaces and Manhattan
Ave/14th Street (Parking Lot D). This project will address ADA issues by installing a ramp
and pedestrian seating.
PBG 17-684 Emergency Operations Center Renovations 193,500$ Ells Freeman
X Hire architect to prepare
interior plans TBD
Reviewing scope of work for restroom renovations, equipment, and dataline relocation. The project will renovate the space adjacent to the EOC and upgrade restroom facilities,
electrical, and IT infrastructure reconfigurations of the Emergency Operations Center.
PBG 17-687 ADA Improvements at Various Locations 150,000$ Fabio Macias
X Council Award 3/26/19 6/30/2019
Recommendation for award of construction contract to City Council 3/26/19 Improvements and relocation of sidewalks, curb ramps and obstructions in highly traversed
areas within the City in order to follow the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meet
the latest Federal Standards. Locations are:6th St @ Prospect Ave, NW, SW; 5th St @
Prospect Ave, NW, NE,SW; 4th St @ Prospect Ave., NW, SW; Gentry Ave @ Prospect Ave,
NW, SW; Hollowell Ave. @ Prospect Ave., NW, NE, Southwest. (If project budget allows)
PBG 17-689 Clark Building Renovations 423,554$ Ells Freeman
X Hire architect to prepare
interior plans - 3/31/19 6/30/2020
Layout of facility to be presented to Public Works Commission/Parks and Recreation
Commission/City Council
Remodel of kitchen and restrooms at Clark Building. The project proposes: 1. Design,
Operational Review 2. Kitchen Remodel - including new commercial appliances, sinks,
countertops, lighting, tile, flooring, doors and ADA upgrades. 3. Restrooms Remodel -
including new flooring, fixtures, stalls, sinks, toilets, lighting, and ADA upgrades. Electrical,
plumbing, sewer line upgrades. 4. Install new HVAC. 5. Acoustic panels and new lighting
throughout ballroom area. 6. ADA upgrades to entrance building entrance points.
PBG 18-691 ADA Improvements at Various Locations 120,000$ Fabio Macias
X Council Award 3/26/19 6/30/2019
Recommendation for award of construction contract to City Council 3/26/19 Improvements and relocation of sidewalks, curb ramps and obstructions in highly traversed
areas within the City in order to follow the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meet
the latest Federal Standards. Locations are:6th St @ Prospect Ave, NW, SW; 5th St @
Prospect Ave, NW, NE,SW; 4th St @ Prospect Ave., NW, SW; Gentry Ave @ Prospect Ave,
NW, SW; Hollowell Ave. @ Prospect Ave., NW, NE, Southwest. (If project budget allows)
PBG 18-692 14th Street Beach Restroom Rehabilitation 110,000$ Ells Freeman
X Hire architect to prepare
designs - 6/30/19 6/30/2020
Staff is waiting for cost from the architect that designed 2nd Street and 22nd Street
restrooms for first phase of this project
This project proposes replacement of the existing sewer lift station components which
includes 2 submersible pumps; motor control panel;
associated plumbing; addition of telemetry for condition/outage notifications.
Categories:
SH = Steet/Highway
SSD = Sewer/Storm Drain
PI = Parks
PBG = Public Building and Ground 3 of 4
City of Hermosa Beach
Updated 3.15.19 FY 2018-19 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Blue indicates a change from prior status report.
Grey indicates project complete. Project CategoryCIP No.Project Name Project Budget Project Manager
Study/Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/ BiddingConstructionCloseoutTentative Date to Next
Milestone/ Update
Estimated Project Completion
Date Current Project Status Project Description
PI 17-546 Citywide Park Improvements 56,359$ Ells Freeman
X
Complete activities at
Noble Park and
Herondo St.
6/30/2019
Current landscaping and maintenance activities are focused are Noble Park improvements
and installation of palm trees on Herondo St.
Current landscaping and maintenance activities are focused are Noble Park improvements
and installation of palm trees on Herondo St.
PBG 15-668 Library Community Needs Assessment 42,522$ Kelly Orta
X TBD TBD
On hold until funding opportunities become available for a new or renovated library facility.This needs assessment includes two phases: Phase I addresses the needs assessment to
provide a report for library facility needs, space planning and daily services. Phase II will
address the preparation of a conceptual design for remodeling the existing facility,
reconstruction, or new construction at a new location.
PBG 16-673 Breakroom Improvements City Hall/Yard 11,227$ Ells Freeman X Complete Complete Project Complete.This project upgraded and renovated the break rooms at City Hall and the City Yard.
PBG 16-674 Police Department Substation Facility Improvement 5,755$ Ells Freeman
X
Complete
communications
equipment installation
6/30/2019
Communications equipment installation to be completed in April 2019.This project upgraded the substation facility included in the Parking Structure to meet police
department storage and communications needs.
PBG 17-683 Bard Street Closure 112,989$ Ells Freeman
X Installation 6/30/2019
The gate installation portion of the project has been completed. An aesthetic treatment to
the gate on Bard St is being designed. Friends of the Library relocation is pending, and will
be re-established as a new CIP when site location is finalized.
This project includes the installation of security gates on Bard Street and 11th Place to
provide a secure location for police and fire vehicles and equipment. The project also
includes relocation of Friends of the Library facility.
PBG 18-693 Community Theater Needs Assessment 30,000$ Kelly Orta
X March 2019 - Release
of RFP 5/31/2019
Staff is finalizing the RFP.This needs assessment will include an analysis and conceptual cost estimates of two
scenarios: a. A major renovation of the Community Theatre to transform it into a regional
performing arts center; and b. A conservative renovation to upgrade the Community
Theatre, taking into consideration its current users and maintaining the community focus of
the facility. Market trends for similar and/or other theaters will also be included.
Categories:
SH = Steet/Highway
SSD = Sewer/Storm Drain
PI = Parks
PBG = Public Building and Ground 4 of 4
From: noreply@granicusideas.com <noreply@granicusideas.com>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 1:02 PM
To: Ann Yang <anny@hermosabch.org>
Subject: New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular
Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
New eComment for City Council Special Meeting
(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -
7:00 P.M.)
Claudia Berman submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: 2f) REPORT 19-0185 PROJECT STATUS REPORT AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 2019 (Acting
Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez)
eComment: On CIP 17-187 Stamped Concrete Replacement on the Strand, there appears to be
2 different concrete colors: 1) The terra cotta that I recall the council selecting 2) Grey, regular
concrete color. I submitted at Go Hermosa request (#5729667) a week ago with pictures
showing the inconsistency. I would think that it should be consistently terra cotta. Did something
change?
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0208
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
ACTION SHEET OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 19, 2019
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the action sheet of the Planning Commission
meeting of March19, 2019.
Attachments:
Action Sheet of March19, 2019
Approved:Ken Robertson, Community Development Director
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
! " !
!"#$
%!&
'!(
#$%&'#( &)%&& # ' *##&($ #)#*)#+,#*
)!!!"!"
!%!%**
+
(
*
$!
,$
(
$$$-
(-"-.
(
!
'!(
*(
%
$ # /0'
)$% ("'
.
!
%('
%
)!!!"!$!1'
*
)!!!"!
!"
(
*+'(!+
!
%
'+!%('!!
'!
+
!
+
!%'!"!('!
'
*2!%'"&'%1 --/3 +--!%!
,$
(
-
4!%
!!*
)!!!"!(
++
%
'!$! %*
!
5
"''!
!"%
-#*
%*!4%%
++
%
%!
5
!%
%
!
5('!
%-++
(
!$
!*!%*
%$
,**
+!
%(!++
*
-&
$
++
*+'(
!"
(
*
*
'!
%
+(
-
#*'
!"
!*
%
!!''(
%!"!
'
'
!
%
+'(
!"%
(
%!"
!%!$
!
+!%
!
%
%
)!!!"!+
+'(
!"-
&+$
!$(
67*
8
!!"
$(
(
*
'
!"-#*'!
%+
!
++
!
!"
+
'('
9'
!$!"
'!
+
!
+
!
6
7
:/
:'6$$ !"%7+
!"
!*'
*'!
%!%%
!
*;$%!*
(
-
)
-
.
!" !"# $
! " !
<'
!$(
+*
**
!"
%-<''+%
'*'!
('+
%!+%
!
+
!!*!6-
-+!
!'(
%%
7'
%!$!(
+'(
%-
-0
"
!%;2!'
; %
$
(+"
!%*!%
!"'=%
'(
!!-
!
!('!*'
%
!"-
-4!%
"
!%
*$'$'%
+%
!-<'!
+
*
"
!%
;+>
+%
"
!
!'!%
?;.
!'!!
-
- "!!' +
@+
'!"'
!
'
!!
*
%+%
%
+%
'!
!%*++(
*
(
*
'(!"'
!-
!!(
'(
%!
!"
+'(
%('$!(
+
%'! +!
%
*
!"
!'
)!!!"!!%**
(
$
!+
!"-
/
'
"/ +
0/*
+
!%)
%
!!
2
4
)
**!!
A(
!!!%2
A
/
+
)
! B
!A(
!'!
+
!
8'
!8!"
!!
B*!)!!!"2!"
<'CA!%
!)!!
1/'
23
4/AD)?A&
/ 1
#!*!?! )'(
!"
!%)>
E!!"2+
)'(
E!!"2+
%
&
) &
'()#( +%#(+*
5/AD)?A&
/ 1
++*
4
(' )!!!"!!2!'
& **
!%
)!!!"!++
!2!'
*
4
('
"'
!"-
)!!!"!2
!"2!'
*4
(' %
&
+ 6
*
7
..
- 7
! " !
/
"
!" !"# $
! " !
- /
/* 8 9
(
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
&DAD?22D &#? ?&DD8?.AD4A?2&D)8 # 0 &44 AD
AD?22D &#? ? 8<-&D4# 8D# #? ? D#&D2AD & .#&&D)8 # 0
?22# #? -)8D D? ?& @2D&&&D &44AD?22D &#? .#88D&D
&#? ?4&D)8 # 0?22# #? -
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
) &&
#+*&(:
;/AD)?A&
/ 33
A
&/!!'
+*!/
(
"
!%!@
)
&A
!%*
+!!"!
(
!
!%
%**'
$-
&/!!'
$
+
%*G'
(
:-
%!
!*!!
+!
(
!
%
H !%%#!!")!!!"!A
$-I
-)
!% !%%'+%
% 1-+%*
-)
;A
+*+
%-+%*
-)
*+
%
-)
?**
*+
%
-84'!
8
!
!+
!
+
3-%
D!*
!*+
%
1-%
D!*
!*+
%
%
&
+ 6
)
+&
-
/
6-
+ +
!)
%
!!
4
**!!
!!!%A
/
+
&*!!'(>
+
!
$(
'!+''!+
- *
2'!+%
F-
) &&&
!" !"# $
! " !
$%&#+*&(:
!/AD)?A&
/ 1
@) /
9'
*!%!@
)
$"
+('!
3 )*"$ '
: 62"
D!7!%%
!!
+>
"D5
+*
*!D!!
!J'-
&%+
%
'!++!"!%!@
)
/
$"
+('!
3 )*"$
62"
D!7!%%
!
+>
"
5
+
*
*!D!!
!J'6DJ7-
-*A
'!
-++! '(
-
)
-E!!"2+!%
)
-8
")
!%A%'2+
3-)A
:/
1-)A
3/
:-)A
/
%
&
+ 6
7
+&
..
- 6 /
6-
+ +
!)
%
!!
4
**!!
!!!%A
/
+
&*!!'(>
+
!
$(
'!+''!+
- *
2'!+%
F(
++
%
'!(!+**
%(+: -
) &<
/)
&
/AD)?A&
/ 1
(A
+!'!!
/AD)?A&
/ 1
( 'A
+!2>)!!!")>
/AD)?A&
/ 3
+ 3 )!!!"!&
!
4''
"
!%#
&A
!%*
+ 3 )!!!"!
!
*''
"
!%
-
'
!" !"# $
! " !
+ 3 )!!!"!&
!
4''
"
!%%
&
/AD)?A&
/ 1
'
!%**'
G!'!%4
(' A
+
!(
-.
+
(
!
5!=
!"-.
++
'+
!
-
&
/
&
"/+ =
F+
-
!- - *
2'!+%
+%
*'!
$!%
!%
!
*!%
!*
)!!!"!($**
!
5
"'
%'
%
'!
!"-#!
!
'!!
$
$$(
+
%!*''
"
!%*'!$!
!(
+
%!%
!=%
!
%
+
!%!"'!=
$!%*!%
!-
(
!" !"# $
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0207
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
(Community Development Director Ken Robertson)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the April 16, 2019 Planning Commission
tentative future agenda items.
Attachments:
Planning Commission April 16, 2019 Tentative Future Agenda
Respectfully submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
Tentative Future Agenda
PLANNING COMMISSION
City of Hermosa Beach
April 16, 2019
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Project Title Public
Notice
Meeting
Date
11 Pier Avenue, Slaters 50/50—Conditional Use Permit and Parking
Plan Amendment to allow floor plan modifications to terminate 774
square feet of restaurant space, expand an existing 349 square foot
outdoor dining patio by adding 774 square feet closing at 11:00 P.M.
daily, and to provide tandem parking spaces with valet parking in
conjunction with an existing late-night on-sale general alcohol
establishment located at 3-11 Pier Avenue (Slater’s 50/50 Restaurant). 4/4/19 4/16/19
Review of Planning Commission roles and responsibilities. 4/16/19
f:\b95\cd\pc\future items\tent. future agendas\planning commission tentative agenda 4-16-19
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0186
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
CLARIFICATIONS TO PROCESS AND STANDARDS
FOR REVIEW OF ON-SALE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
CONITIONAL USE PERMITS
(Community Development Director Ken Robertson)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council affirm the attached clarifications to the Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) review process.
Executive Summary:
The Planning Commission has recently clarified the process and standards for review of on-sale
alcoholic beverage Conditional Use Permits (CUPs), and seeks affirmation of these updates from the
City Council. The updates make clear that the tri-annual review is based on a review of incidents for
the prior six months, and that the Chief of Police has the discretion to recommend the Planning
Commission conduct a more thorough review of a specific CUP at any time.
Background:
The Planning Commission at its meeting of August 21, 2018 adopted the attached clarifications to the
“Process and Standards for Review of On-Sale Alcoholic Beverage Conditional Use Permits”. The
Downtown Enhancement Subcommittee has also reviewed and supports these clarifications.
The Planning Commission directed staff to provide clarification for the newly established tri-annual
CUP review process with respect to the evaluation and reporting period used for each review. This
clarification is expressed in the amended item number 5 in the attached document, which makes
clear the review is for the prior six (6) months, consistent with the period for the criteria thresholds.
In addition, the language is clarified to confirm that the Chief of Police retains discretion to bring an
establishment before the Planning Commission for review anytime, where for example, there are
continuing police problems or nuisances. The issue of Police Chief discretion has also been a
concern of the Downtown Enhancement Subcommittee, relating to a perception that the Chief’s
discretion was limited to only incidents related to serious crimes, and not crimes and other incidents
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0186
(i.e. ABC violations) that may be indicators of establishment’s poor management practices that
should warrant a thorough review.
The tri-annual CUP review process continues to provide an objective and consistent approach to
reviewing CUPs for alcohol sales, but was not intended to otherwise limit the Chief’s ability to
recommend a more thorough Planning Commission review of a specific CUP in his/her ordinary
course of duty. Therefore, the language is clarified in the policy that notwithstanding the CUP review,
the Chief may recommend a CUP review at any time to determine if CUP revocation or modification
is warranted.
Attachments:
Proposed amendment with Planning Commission additions
Respectfully Submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
Process and Standards for Review of On-Sale Alcoholic Beverage Conditional Use Permits
1) The CUP review process will consist of an administrative review process in which the on-sale establishments’
activities would be reviewed against an established set of criteria three times per year.
2) On-sale establishments with a CUP would be referred to the Planning Commission for a CUP review, and
subsequently for a modification/revocation hearing if the Commission so decided upon its review, when they exceed
established standards for each criteria to trigger such a review.
3) The standards that would trigger a referral to the Planning Commission for a CUP review and potential
modification/revocation hearing will be based on the frequency or number of incidents/violations within a stipulated
timeframe. This type of system avoids the inherent problems of “point systems” where the standards for assigning
values are potentially subjective.
4) The standards that would trigger a referral to the Planning Commission for a CUP review and potentially for a
subsequent modification/revocation hearing are as indicated in Table 1 below.
5) The administrative review of CUPs should be conducted three times per year with an evaluation of the on-sale
establishments’ activities for the prior 6-month period. While a “rolling process” with a sliding timeframe would be
more effective in making the review process truly timely (i.e., a rolling process would reduce the potential time
between apparent CUP violations and the Planning Commission’s review), it would impose an unreasonable demand
on City staff for the ongoing monitoring of the relevant data.
6) The standards or criteria of the CUP review system will be made readily available to all on-sale establishments with
CUPs and the public via the City website and/or other appropriate media (including direct mailings) to minimize any
confusion over what standards will initiate a Planning Commission review and potential modification/revocation
hearing.
7) Information from Police and Fire Department related to patterns of patronage of on-sale establishments (as indicated
by investigations of intoxicated persons after incidents) and consistency with “Model House Policies” may be generally
considered by the Planning Commission as factors in whether the business is being operated responsibly and
engaging in the responsible service of alcohol. This information may be considered by the planning commission, as
additional justification for holding a CUP review hearing after referral based on the criteria above has been determined
and as evidence in any CUP modification/revocation hearing.
Table 1. CUP Review Standards
Standard Initiating P.C. Review(a)
Criterion (Number of incidents in any 6 months)
Violation of Operating Hours 2
ABC Violations (underage serving, violation of hours, etc.) 2
Overcrowding Citation 1
Criminal Citation of Staff while Working/on Premises 2 (a)
Serious Crime on Premises indicative of Lack of Adequate Security 2 (a)
(Combination of any 3 or more)
Violation of any CUP Condition (b)
ABC Violations (underage service, violation of hours, etc.)
Overcrowding Citation
Criminal Citation of Staff while Working/on Premises
Serious Crime on Premises indicative of Lack of Adequate Security
Noise Citation
Health Department Violation
Outdoor Encroachment Permit Violation
Building Code Violation (incl. remodeling without permit)
Sign Ordinance Violation
NPDES Violation
(Administrative Determination)
“Excessive Number” of Calls for Police Service
“Excessive Number” of Public Complaints to City
“Excessive Number” of Criminal Events on/adjacent to Premises
NOTE: (a) – Recommended threshold number; Chief of Police retains authority to may recommend CUP review to Commission at his/her discretion—at
any time regardless of number of incidents in any period of time, to determine whether revocation/medication is appropriate under HBMC 17.70.010—as
stipulated in many current CUPs and the Municipal Code. (b) Non-submittal of food to alcohol sales ratio reports in a timely manner when required by a
CUP is considered a violation of the CUP condition. Reporting of the food to alcohol sales ratio required by a CUP, ABC license, or the Municipal Code
may be required and considered during any modification/revocation action.
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0206
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION
MEETING OF JANUARY 16, 2019
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works
Commission meeting of January 16, 2019.
Attachments:
Action Minutes of January 16, 2019
Approved: Lucho Rodriguez, P.E., Acting Public Works Director
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
ACTION MINUTES
PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, January 16, 2019
CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1315 VALLEY DRIVE
7:00 P.M.
COMMISSIONERS
Andrea Giancoli Kathy Dunbabin Janice Brittain Kent F. Brown David Grethen
1.Call to Order 7:02 p.m.
2.Pledge of Allegiance
3.Roll Call
Present: Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Grethen, and Chairwoman Brittain.
Absent: Commissioner Dunbabin and Commissioner Giancoli*
*Commissioner Giancoli arrived at 7:16 p.m.
Staff present: Glen W.C. Kau, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Ells Freeman, Public Works
Superintendent; Kathy Shin, Assistant City Attorney; and Bea Chan, Management Analyst.
4.Approval of Action Minutes
Chairperson Brittain confirmed that the July meeting was cancelled.
ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Brown to approve the action minutes from May 16, 2018.
Commissioner Grethen seconded and the motion passed.
AYES: Brittain, Brown, and Grethen
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Dunbabin and Giancoli
ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Brown to approve the action minutes from September 19, 2018.
Commissioner Grethen seconded and the motion passed.
AYES: Brittain, Brown, and Grethen
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Dunbabin and Giancoli
ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Brown to approve the action minutes from November 28, 2018.
Commissioner Grethen seconded and the motion passed.
AYES: Brittain, Brown, and Grethen
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Dunbabin and Giancoli
5.Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items– None, No Action
4a
6. Correspondence – None, No Action
7. Presentations – None, No Action
8.Items for Consideration
a.Request to approve the staff recommendations to allow a property owner to remove one tree at 1802
Hillcrest Drive and accept the installation of replacement tree at approximately the same location.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
•Debra Love, 1802 Hillcrest Drive
ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Brown that the Public Works Commission approve the parkway
tree permit as submitted, seconded by Commissioner Grethen, and the motion passed.
AYES: Brittain, Brown, and Grethen
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Dunbabin and Giancoli
b.Request to approve staff recommendations to not install bollards on the Strand at 11th Street and accept
the installation of pavement markings instead to keep the intersection clear.
ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Brown that the Public Works Commission approve this
proposal, seconded by Commissioner Grethen, and the motion passed.
AYES: Brittain, Brown, Giancoli, and Grethen
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Dunbabin
c.Request that the Public Works Commission review the tree policy questions and discuss preferred policy
alternatives with staff and the City Attorney’s office to develop an amended tree ordinance for presentation
to City Council.
COMMISSION RESPONSE TO TREE POLICY STUDY QUESTIONS:
A.Planting Policy
1)Yes, property owners should be required to obtain a permit. However, staff should examine the current
fee. *Direction to come back.
B.Maintenance Policy
1) Retain the current language of “complete maintenance.”
2)No.
3)Yes, a permit is required. The question of which permit relates to the answer for Question A1.
4)Yes.
5)No.
6)Yes.
7)*Direction to come back.
8)*Direction to come back.
9)Future discussions for public outreach.
C.Removal and Replacement Policy
1)*Direction to come back.
2)No.
3)Yes, to the extent that the Director believes the question need not go to the Commission.
4) Superintendent to furnish information on the industry standards.
5)Yes, if necessary.
4a
PUBLIC COMMENT:
•Scott Hayes, 122 1st Street
ACTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Brown that the Public Works Commission approve the
development of a tree ordinance draft based on this session’s responses and return back to a future Public
Works Commission meeting with additional information as requested. This was seconded by Commissioner
Grethen and the motion passed.
AYES: Brittain, Grethen, Brown, and Giancoli
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Dunbabin
9.Commissioners’ Reports –
Commissioner Brown reported that the installation of the new blinking school signal to slow down traffic was
well received.
10.Monthly Reports – No Action
11.Commissioners’ Items (Other Matters) – No Action
12.Commissioner’s Announcements –
Chairwoman Brittain announced two upcoming events on Saturday, January 19:
*Household hazardous waste round up event on Valley Drive between 8th and 11th Streets from 9 a.m.-3 p.m.
*Document shredding event (for residents only) at Community Center parking lot from 8 a.m.-1 p.m.
Chairwoman Brittain also announced:
*Last night, the Chamber of Commerce at The Comedy and Magic Club honored the Man and Woman of the
year which were George Barks and Adrienne Slaughter.
*Saturday, March 2nd will be the 13th annual Adrienne’s Search for Children’s Cancer Cure Fundraiser – the
money this year it will go to LA Children’s Hospital.
Commissioner Grethen announced:
*At the recent school board meeting, the board approved moving forward the final environmental impact report
and statement of findings regarding North School. There are traffic coordination that will occur between the
school district and the City.
13. Adjournment - The Regular Meeting of the Public Works Commission for January 16, 2019 was adjourned at
10:21 p.m. to the Regular Meeting of the Public Works Commission on Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 7 p.m.
4a
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0137
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND
INSPECTION SERVICES CONTRACT TO TRANSTECH
ENGINEERS, INC. FOR CIP 17-687 AND CIP 18-691,
ADA IMPROVEMENTS ON PROSPECT AVENUE
(Acting Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1.Award the Professional Service Agreement for Construction Management and Inspection
Services for CIP 17-687 and CIP 18-691 for ADA Improvements on Prospect Avenue, in the
amount of $40,460;
2.Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement and the City Clerk to attest subject to approval
by the City Attorney; and
3.Authorize 25% project contingency for a total contract budget of $50,575.00.
Executive Summary:
The Public Works Department has been working on a Capital Improvements Program project that
would utilize Community Development Block Grant funding provided to the City by the County of Los
Angeles to update the curb ramps on Prospect Avenue between 6th Street and Hollowell Avenue to
increase mobility on one of the most commonly used safe routes to school streets in the City,
Prospect Avenue.
Staff requests that City Council award a Professional Services Agreement for Construction
Management and Inspection support during the upcoming curb ramp construction on Prospect
Avenue to adhere to the stringent requirements associated with the funding from the County of Los
Angeles.
Background:
On January 10,2017,City Council adopted a resolution allocating County Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG)funds from the Los Angeles Community Development Commission (LACDC)for
a project that includes the construction of ADA curb ramps on Prospect Avenue for the fiscal year of
2017.Similarly on January 23,2018,City Council adopted a resolution allocating CDBG funds from
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0137
2017.Similarly on January 23,2018,City Council adopted a resolution allocating CDBG funds from
the LACDC for a project that includes the construction of ADA curb ramps on Prospect Avenue for the
fiscal year 2018.
Based on the recommendations of the City’s Traffic Engineer and grant implementation restrictions,
staff determined that the best location to utilize the CDBG funds on Prospect Avenue would be
between 6th Street and Hollowell Avenue.Subsequently,Public Works Staff proceeded with the
design and preparation of construction documents.
The LACDC requires that the City contract with a labor compliance firm to manage the construction
contract and to provide accurate interviewing documentation for the construction crew for reporting to
LACDC.Staff obtained authorization from LACDC to advertise a single RFP for the Construction
Management and Inspection Services of both projects due to the similarity/proximity of the project
and to obtain more competitive pricing.
Analysis:
Public Works staff issued a Request for Proposal (RFP)in 2018 to provide labor compliance,
construction management,and inspection services for the project and two (2)proposals were
received by the City Clerk’s Office by the RFP deadline.Public Works staff reviewed and ranked the
proposals as follows:
Rank F ir m Fee Location
1 Transtech Engineers, Inc. $40,460 Chino, CA
2 KOA $48,340 Monterey Park, CA
The primary role of a Construction Manager is to communicate with residents regarding temporary
construction impacts,such as traffic changes,noise,limited access and construction schedule.As a
professional services contract,the City has the opportunity to select the proposer most qualified to
perform the services,rather than an obligation so select the lowest bidder as required for
construction contracts.The submitted proposals were reviewed to identify the most responsive
qualified firm for the construction management services based on demonstrated competence,
experience on similar projects and professional qualifications.The proposer fees were not
considered until after the identification of the most qualified firm,although Transtech Engineers,Inc.
also proposed the lowest fee.
Of the two firms that submitted a proposal,staff recommends that City Council award an agreement
to Transtech Engineers,Inc.to provide construction management and inspection services for CIP 17-
687 and CIP 18-691 for ADA Improvements on Prospect Avenue,for the proposed amount of
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0137
687 and CIP 18-691 for ADA Improvements on Prospect Avenue,for the proposed amount of
$40,460.
General Plan Consistency:
This report and associated recommendations have been evaluated for their consistency with the
City’s General Plan. Relevant policies are listed below:
3.3.2 Complete Pedestrian Network.Prioritize investment in designated priority sidewalks to ensure a
complete network of sidewalks and pedestrian-friendly amenities that enhances pedestrian safety,
access opportunities and connectivity to destinations.
7.2.4.Sidewalk Improvements.Consider innovative funding strategies,such as cost-sharing,ADA
accessibility grants,or sidewalk dedications,to improve the overall condition,safety,and accessibility
of sidewalks.
Fiscal Impact:
The projects’expenses are reimbursable through CDBG funds.The City has allocated funds in the
following accounts for each project to cover the labor compliance support,the construction
management, the inspection and the construction expenses:
CIP Number Account # Amount
CIP 17-687 140-8687-4201 $150,000
CIP 18-691 140-8691-4201 $120,000
Total Funding $270,000
The majority of the funds ($219,425)would be utilized to cover the construction cost of the project
(provided in a separate staff report to Council)and the project construction contingency.The
construction management services that Transtech Engineers,Inc.would provide for $50,575,
including 25%contingency,would be proportionally charged to both project accounts for the
remaining funds available.
Attachments:
1.Request for Proposal
2.Draft Professional Services Agreement
3.Consultant’s Proposal and Fee
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0137
Respectfully Submitted by: Fabio M. Macias, E.I.T., Assistant Engineer
Concur: Lucho Rodriguez, P.E., Acting Director of Public Works
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director
Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™
May 2018
Page 1 of 3
City of Hermosa Beach
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 (310) 318-0214
Thursday, May 24, 2018
Re: ADA Improvements on Prospect Avenue – Construction Management/Inspection
and Labor Compliance Services, CIP No. 17-687, CDBG No. 601869-17, Request for
Proposal
Dear Mr. Consultant:
The City of Hermosa Beach is located within the southwestern coastal portion of Los
Angeles County in what is commonly referred to locally as the “South Bay” area. The
City is bounded on the north by the City of Manhattan Beach, on the south by the City
of Redondo Beach, on the east by the City of Redondo Beach and the City of
Manhattan Beach, and on the west by the Pacific Ocean. The city limits for Hermosa
Beach encompass a relatively small land area, approximately 1.4 square miles.
Hermosa Beach includes nearly two miles of shoreline and varies in width between
one-half mile and approximately one mile inland. Elevations in the City range from
sea-level and rise up to 250 feet in elevation.
In 2016, the City of Hermosa Beach had an estimated population of 19,801. With a
land area of 1.4 square miles, Hermosa Beach has a high population density, with
approximately 13,900 people per square mile.
The Public Works Department is seeking proposals to provide Construction
Management/Inspection and labor compliance services to prepare complete
construction documents for the ADA improvements on Prospect Avenue between 6th
Street and Hollowell Avenue. The construction of ADA concrete ramps including the
adjustment of utilities to grade, removal and construction of curb and gutter, repair
of asphalt, thermoplastic/paint striping/markings and other miscellaneous work as
needed to complete the intended construction of the ADA ramps. The identified
funding sources for this project Community Development Block Grant (CDBG).
Prospect Avenue is considered an arterial street, consists of one lane in each
direction, and travels in a north-south direction. The project limits are 6th Street and
Hollowell Avenue.
The construction management/inspection and labor compliance services to be
provided shall include for at minimum:
o Pre-construction Conference
o Management Information System (MIS)
o Review Traffic Controls Plans
o Meetings
May 2018
Page 2 of 3
City of Hermosa Beach
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 (310) 318-0214
o Issues Management
o Schedule
o Cost Control
o Labor Compliance
o Change Orders
o Dispute Resolution
o Quality Control/Inspection
o Public Relations
o Permit/Environmental Compliance
o Progress Payments
o Monthly/periodic Status Reports
o Site Safety
o “As-Built/Record” Drawings
o Project Completion Report
o Final Walkthrough
The City has solicited for Construction bids and anticipates to open bids on June 14th,
2018. If the bids received exceed the $120,000 Engineer’s Cost Estimate, the scope of
the project can be reduced by removing the reconstruction of the curb ramps on
Hollowell Avenue.
The format of the proposal for the work scope shall consists of a clear and concise
response to address the work scope tasks as presented; identify assigned, qualified
staff for the project; proposed schedule to complete construction
management/inspection services for the project duration.
The format for the proposed fee shall consists of a tabular format, with resources &
hourly rate on the top, work scope tasks of the left, assigned hours for each resource
per task indicated, hours/costs summary for each scope task on the right. An overall
total shall also be included at the lower right of the table. An example is attached
for reference.
The plans and specifications can be provided via email upon request to the Project
Manager, Fabio M. Macias at fmacais@hermosabch.org.
Submittals shall consists of three (3) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy on a USB
flash drive. The proposed fee can be submitted with the proposal and shall be
separated from the work scope response.
Design proposals are due Monday, June 25, 2018 by 11:00 AM.
Should you require further information, please contact:
May 2018
Page 3 of 3
City of Hermosa Beach
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 (310) 318-0214
Fabio M. Macias
(310) 318-0228 or fmacias@hermosabch.org.
Sincerely.
Glen W. C. Kau, P.E.
Public Works Director/City Engineer
Attachment(s): Construction Management/Inspection Services RFP
Sample Fee Table
Sample Agreement
May 2018
04-25-18_CIP#16-174_Hermosa Avenue Pavement Rehab_ConstMgmt-Insp - RFP Page 1 of 4
City of Hermosa Beach
Public Works Department
1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
(310) 318-0214 Fax (310) 937-5015
Request for Proposals to Provide
Construction Management, Inspection,
& Labor Compliance Services
(RFP 18-09)
For
ADA Improvements on Prospect Avenue
CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Department is soliciting proposals from qualified
engineering consultants to provide construction management, inspection and labor compliance
services for the ADA Improvements on Prospect Avenue, CIP# 17-687. The project is specified
to be completed in 30 Working Days. The Engineer’s Estimate is approximately $ 120,000.
II. DESCRIPTION OF STREET RESURFACING PROJECT
The proposed work shall be performed in accordance with the plans, specification and other
contract documents as specified herein and shall consist of the following general work
descriptions: the construction of ADA concrete ramps including the adjustment of utilities to grade,
removal and construction of curb and gutter, repair of asphalt, thermoplastic/paint
striping/markings and other miscellaneous work as needed to complete the intended construction
of the ADA ramps.
III. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Service Function Deliverables
Pre-construction
Conference
Outline project specifics. Inform contractor of project
administration procedures.
Agenda meeting
minutes
Management
Information System
(MIS)
Implement system for organizing, tracking, filing, and
managing paper/electronic correspondence including
letters, information requests, submittals, contracts,
reports, O&M manuals, progress payments, and
change orders, etc.
Paper files, digital
files, correspondence
logs.
Review Traffic
Controls Plans
Review contractor’s plans for detours, shutdowns and
access for emergency vehicles.
Review traffic control
plan
May 2018
04-25-18_CIP#16-174_Hermosa Avenue Pavement Rehab_ConstMgmt-Insp - RFP Page 2 of 4
Meetings Conduct meetings to discuss, background, scope,
objectives, schedule, current, and past issues as
necessary.
Agenda meeting
minutes
Issues Management Analyze issues, seek appropriate advice, and give
recommendations. Review cost reduction proposals
as well as contractor’s methods of construction in
order to ensure compliance with plans and
specifications and delivery of project within budget
and the time specified.
Design clarifications.
Contract change
orders.
Schedule Monitor contractor’s schedule weekly. Notify parties of
actual or potential deviation from schedule. Work with
project team to correct noncompliance with schedule.
Schedule reports and
recommendations of
“As-built” schedule
Cost Control Monitor project funding. Monitor project budgets.
Review contract item payments, material quantities,
and change order payments.
Budget reports and
cost estimate reviews
Labor Compliance
and any other
services that are
necessary to ensure
full compliance with
CDBG, federal, State
and county
requirements.
Provide labor compliance report(s). Attend, present,
and prepare meeting minutes for pre-construction
conferences associated to CDBG requirements to
contractors. Review and approve CDBG-related
submittals. Prepare and assist the City with
submission of any reporting documents required by
federal, state and county agencies. Verify and
document job-site posting of wage rate information
and required labor compliance poster. Perform
employee interviews on site as necessary for
compliance. Review and approve weekly certified
payroll and associated documents, and work with
contractor to correct deficiencies in a timely manner.
Keep a complete labor compliance file and provide to
the City upon project completion.
Provide labor
compliance report (s)
to include reporting
on prevailing wage,
payroll
documentation,
compliance status,
and certified payrolls.
Change Orders Review potential change orders for contractual and
technical merit. Prepare independent cost estimate
and schedule analysis of work. Negotiate and prepare
change orders for execution. Keep the City apprised
of impact of cumulative change orders.
Independent review
of cost estimate for
change orders.
Ready for execution
of change order
summary reports.
Dispute Resolution Make recommendations and implement procedures
for reducing the likelihood of disputes and claims.
Assist in the resolution of disputes.
Dispute avoidance
procedures and give
recommendations
Quality
Control/Inspection
Observe and monitor all aspects of project. Notify
contractor when work is not in compliance. Prepare
daily inspection reports. Provide photographic and
video documentation of construction process.
Encourage and stress quality in the constructed
product. Provide materials testing services.
Photograph and
videotapes project
files
Public Relations Communicate with local business community
regarding temporary construction impacts, such as
traffic changes, noise, limited access and construction
schedule.
Verbal and written
notices delivered to
local businesses
Permit/Environmental
Compliance
Review and enforce requirements stipulated in
permits issued by regulatory and environmental
agencies.
Daily inspection
reports and
correspondence
Progress Payments Review and approve all contractor’s payment request.
Verify contractor pay items. Prepare payment
documentation for execution.
Progress payment
request documents
May 2018
04-25-18_CIP#16-174_Hermosa Avenue Pavement Rehab_ConstMgmt-Insp - RFP Page 3 of 4
Monthly Status
Reports
Prepare monthly reports highlighting project progress,
CCO’s, cost issues, and schedule.
Monthly report
Site Safety Review and monitor contractor’s safety program for
compliance with Cal/OSHA. Notify contractor if unsafe
condition is observed. Notify City if contractor refuses
to rectify unsafe condition. Investigate accidents.
Accident reports and
monthly reports.
“As-Built” Drawings Collect, review, and transmit contractor’s data to
engineer.
Review data for
accuracy for record
drawings.
Final Walkthrough Make final inspections, Prepare punch-list. Verify that
required certificates of compliance, O&M manuals and
as-built drawings have been delivered.
Punch list
Project Completion
Report
Process final progress payment to contractor. File
Notice of Completion. Prepare final report. Review
project records
Final progress
payment, Notice of
Completion and Final
report. Deliver project
records to the City
IV. CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL
Include the following items in the proposal:
A. Company Overview: introduce your firm and provide a general description of your
company’s qualifications and experience, with emphasis on previous projects which are
similar to the one proposed. Please include an organizational chart, staffing plan, and
resumes for all parties involved in the project. List a maximum of five (5) projects (total)
that your firm has performed for other public or private agencies, which demonstrate your
firm’s ability to perform this work.
B. Name and license number of the engineer in charge and inspectors for this work
C. Approach and Methodology
D. Proposed Schedule of Work
E. Fee: In separate, sealed envelope, provide a fee schedule and a total “Not to Exceed”
fee for completing the work included in each Alternative, as described in the Scope of
Services above. All fees shall include labor, materials, reprographics, meetings, and
presentations. All approved deliverable products shall become property of the City of
Hermosa Beach.
F. Consultant’s use of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE’s).
V. CONSULTANT SELECTION
The Public Works Department will evaluate all proposals based on criteria for the evaluation of
the proposals may include, but not limited to the following:
A. Completeness of proposal
B. Consultant’s demonstrated understanding of the Scope of Services
C. Quality of work previously performed by the firm
D. The resources required to perform the required services
E. Proposed Schedule of Work
VI. RIGHT TO REJECT ALL PROPOSALS
The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted. No
guarantee is hereby made that any contract will be awarded pursuant to this Request for
Proposals, or otherwise. All costs incurred in the preparation of the proposals, in the submission
of additional information, and/or in any other aspect of a proposal prior to the award of a written
contract will be borne by the respondent.
May 2018
04-25-18_CIP#16-174_Hermosa Avenue Pavement Rehab_ConstMgmt-Insp - RFP Page 4 of 4
VII. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
An original and three (3) copies and one (1) electronic copy on a USB flash drive of the proposal
shall be presented in a sealed envelope bearing the name, address, and telephone number of
the individual or entity submitting the proposal and shall be addressed as follows:
Request for Proposals to Provide Construction Management, Inspection & Labor
Compliance Services (RFP 18-07)
Deliver To:
Office of the City Clerk, 2nd Floor
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Attn: Fabio M. Macias, Project Manager
The proposal shall be delivered to the above address on or before 11:00 a.m. on June 25,
2018.
VIII. STAFF CONTACT
Should you require further information, please contact Fabio M. Macias at (310) 318-0228 or
fmacias@hermosabch.org.
Sincerely.
Glen W. C. Kau, P.E.
Public Works Director/City Engineer
Attachment(s): Sample proposed fee format
Sample Professional Services Agreement
Hermosa Avenue Resurfacing Project
Item No.Assigned
Resources Engineer CAD Drafter Principal
Admin
Support Survey Soils Totals
Scope of Work (Rate)85$ 75$ 125$ $ 65 135$ 165$
1 Field review 4 340$ -$ -$ -$ 4 540$ -$ 880$
2 Review of Pavement
management study data -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
3 Pavement core samples (as
needed/recommended)-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6 990$ 990$
4 Pavement design for
rehabilitation method -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5 Bus pads where
recommended/needed 3 255$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 255$
6 Restoration of induction loops
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
7
Installation of a new detector
loop on Pier Avenue
westbound left turn
movement/pocket onto
Hermosa Avenue -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
8
Restoration of all pavement
markings; i.e., striping, lane
lines, cross walks, parking tees
& ells, stop bars, handicap
parking stalls, pedestrian
markings, bicycle markings &
sharrows
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
9 Refreshing of all curb painting
and markings -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
10
Survey markings where
removed as part of other
improvements within the
project limits -$ -$ 4 500$ -$ 6 810$ -$ 1,310$
11 Preparation of construction
plans 2 170$ 6 450$ -$ -$ 1 135$ -$ 755$
12
Preparation of the technical
and supportive specifications
as part of the bid documents
3 255$ -$ -$ 6 390$ -$ -$ 645$
13 Preparation of traffic control
plans -$ 3 225$ 5 625$ -$ -$ -$ 850$
Hermosa Avenue Resurfacing Project
Item No.Assigned
Resources Engineer CAD Drafter Principal
Admin
Support Survey Soils Totals
Scope of Work (Rate)85$ 75$ 125$ $ 65 135$ 165$
14
Engineer’s estimate, proposed
design schedule and
estimated construction
schedule 3 255$ -$ 3 375$ -$ -$ -$ 630$
Total Proposed Fee:6,315$
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE PROVISION OF
[Description of services to be provided]
BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND
[Name of Company/Organization to Provide Services].
This AGREEMENT is entered into this ___ day of [Month] , [Year], by and between
the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a general law city a municipal corporation (“CITY”) and
____________________________, a limited liability company (“CONSULTANT”).
R E C I T A L S
A. The City desires to obtain professional services from the Consultant for
________________________________________________________________.
B. The City does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the
services required under this agreement and therefore, the City desires to contract
for consulting services to accomplish this work.
C. The Consultant warrants to the City that it has the qualifications, experience and
facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, the City and the Consultant
agree as follows:
1. CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION
A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in
the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as EXHIBIT A hereto and incorporated
herein by reference.
B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the
terms and conditions contained in this Agreement.
C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT as set forth in
EXHIBIT A, for CONSULTANT’s services, unless otherwise specified by
written amendment to this Agreement.
D. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred,
unless first approved by the City Manager or his/her designee.
E. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each
month, its invoice for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the
previous month. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT all uncontested amounts set
forth in CONSULTANT’s invoice within 30 days after it is received.
Page 2 of 10
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
A. CONSULTANT will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE
OF SERVICE attached hereto as Exhibit A.
B. Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY,
CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical,
administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials,
equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary
or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services
required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement.
3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement,
CONSULTANT must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific
tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed
during the billing period in accordance with the schedule of compensation incorporated in
“Exhibit A.”
4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of the CONTRACTOR are to commence
upon receipt of a notice to proceed from the CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is
completed to the CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in
“Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing by the CITY.
5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT
represents that CONSULTANT has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of
services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c)
understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services
under this Agreement.
6. KEY PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT’s key person assigned to perform work under this
Agreement is ______________. CONSULTANT shall not assign another person to be in charge
of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City.
7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution
by both parties and have an initial term of ______ (_) years unless earlier termination occurs
under Section 11 of this Agreement, or this Agreement is extended in writing by mutual
agreement as necessary to complete the project.
8. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this
Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the
contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing,
executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in
the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties.
9. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a
Taxpayer Identification Number.
Page 3 of 10
10. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONTRACTOR will obtain and maintain during the term
of this Agreement all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in
connection with the performance of services under this Agreement.
11. TERMINATION. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement
at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing.
CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days
before the effective termination date.
In the event of such termination, the CONTRACTOR shall cease services as of the date of
termination, and all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other
materials prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property,
and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily
completed up to the effective date of notice of termination.
Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own
terms services similar to those terminated.
12. INDEMNIFICATION.
A. CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by CITY, and
hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and
against all liability, loss, damage, expense, and cost (including without limitation
reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of
every nature arising from third party claims that are out of or in connection with
CONSULTANT's negligent of wrongful performance of work hereunder or its
failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT,
regardless of CITY’S passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage
which is caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY.
Should CITY in its sole discretion find CONSULTANT’S legal counsel
unacceptable, then CONSULTANT shall reimburse the CITY its costs of defense,
including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other
costs and fees of litigation. The CONSULTANT shall promptly pay any final
judgment rendered against the CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and
agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is
permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this
Agreement.
B. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be
maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 17, and any approval of
said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or
qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT
pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions
concerning indemnification.
C. Except to the extent of an indemnification obligation set forth herein, to the
maximum extent allowable under applicable law, CITY agrees that
Page 4 of 10
CONSULTANT shall not be liable for any monetary damages in excess of the
amounts paid to CONSULTANT under this agreement. CITY agrees that
CONSULTANT shall not be liable for lost profits, lost opportunities,
consequential or incidental damages resulting from CONSULTANT’s
performance under this agreement.
13. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT’s professional services.
CONSULTANT’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s
written approval are prohibited and will be null and void.
14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that
CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the
manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to
be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an
agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance,
bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that
may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work
or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the
direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only.
15. AUDIT OF RECORDS.
A. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain,
and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant
information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises,
upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of
interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records,
accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation
for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT
further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following
final payment under this Agreement.
B. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining
to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement.
16. CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective
measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by the City to
implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required
corrective measures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement.
17. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.
A. The CONSULTANT, at the CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense, shall
procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance
policies:
Page 5 of 10
1. Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. The Consultant shall
require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation
insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or
non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by
the CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall
agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers,
agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed
by the CONTRACTOR for City.
2. General Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain
commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than two
million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance
form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the
general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed
under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice
the required occurrence limit.
3. Automobile Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain
automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage
for all activities of the CONSULTANT arising out of or in connection
with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage
for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than
one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each
occurrence.
4. Professional Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain
professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against
claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from
the CONSULTANT’S operations under this Agreement, whether such
operations are by the CONSULTANT or by its employees, subcontractors,
or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one
million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a
combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis. When coverage is provided
on a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the
insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is
terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the
policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover
CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or
omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during
the time this Agreement was in effect.
B. Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional
liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance
company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of
California, or which is approved in writing by City, and shall be endorsed as
follows. CONSULTANT also agrees to require all contractors, and
Page 6 of 10
subcontractors to do likewise.
1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents,
and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to
liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the
CONSULTANT, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in
connection with such work or operations.”
2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its
elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers.
Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self-insured
retention the CITY may have shall be considered excess insurance only
and shall not contribute with this policy.
3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though
a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the
limits of liability of the insuring company.
4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected
or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents.
5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not
affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers,
officials, employees, agents, or volunteers.
6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days
written notice has been received by the CITY.
C. CONSULTANT agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss
against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement. CITY
assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the
duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to
involve CITY.
D. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by
the CITY. At the CITY’s option, the CONSULTANT shall demonstrate financial
capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions.
E. The CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance with original
endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein.
Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the CITY on or before
commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of
insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this
Agreement.
F. Failure on the part of the CONSULTANT to procure or maintain required
insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY
Page 7 of 10
may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11 above.
G. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this
Agreement shall allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured
retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the Consultant (as the
named insured) should Consultant fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements.
The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City
Attorney and the Finance Director. Consultant understands and agrees that
satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the
effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by Consultant as primary insured to pay
its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City
pay the SIR or deductible on Consultant’s behalf upon the Consultant’s failure or
refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional
insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any
action against Consultant for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other
damages incurred by City due to the breach.
18. USE OF OTHER CONSULTANTS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY’s prior written
approval to use any sub-consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such
approval must include approval of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation.
19. FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by
the CONSULTANT of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a
release of the CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONSULTANT for
anything done, furnished or relating to the CONSULTANT’S work or services. Acceptance of
payment shall be any negotiation of the CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra
compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However,
approval or payment by the CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the
responsibility and liability of the CONSULTANT, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for
the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such
approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by the
CITY for any defect or error in the work prepared by the Consultant, its employees, sub-
consultants and agents.
20. CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the
CONSULTANT shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed
during the City’s review of the Consultant’s report or plans. Should the Consultant fail to make
such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by the CITY, and
the cost thereof shall be charged to the CONSULTANT. In addition to all other available
remedies, the City may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by the
City or may withhold payment otherwise owed CONSULTANT under this Agreement up to the
amount of the cost of correction.
21. NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONSULTANT by
CITY for services performed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget
and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient
funds for payment of CONSULTANT’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement
shall cover payment for CONSULTANT’S services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year
Page 8 of 10
in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion
of such fiscal year.
22. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made
when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows:
CITY CONSULTANT
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
ATTN: Nico De Anda-Scaia
[Name & Title]
[Organization]
[Address]
Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by
the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly
addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of
actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are
to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of
notices may be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S.
mail or personally delivered as specified in this Section.
23. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor
retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, to solicit or
secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed
to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting
from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this
warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability.
24. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein are
generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any
other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT’s or
CITY’s obligations under this Agreement.
25. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving
this agreement will be in Los Angeles County.
26. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire
understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements
expressed or implied, oral or written.
27. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently
review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed
simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for
or against either Party.
28. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary
action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to
Page 9 of 10
engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment
with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city manager, or designee, may execute
any such amendment on behalf of CITY.
29. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties
agree that this Contract, agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be
entered into in connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a
party is delivered by facsimile transmission or scanned and delivered via electronic mail. Such
facsimile or electronic mail copies will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an
original signature.
30. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire,
flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural
elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will
immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other.
31. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to
be provided.
32. ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his
or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the
negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected
therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this
Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and
costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled.
33. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT
represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity
to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its
financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability,
personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in
dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the
proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to
satisfy a public agency.
34. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. It is understood and agreed that the City shall own
all documents and other work product of the Consultant, except the Consultant’s notes and work
papers, which pertain to the work performed under this Agreement. The City shall have the sole
right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the Consultant,
but any re-use of such documents by the City on any other project without prior written consent
of the Consultant shall be at the sole risk of the City.
35. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (City and Consultant initials required at one of the
following paragraphs)
By their respective initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that
Consultant is a “consultant” for the purposes of the California Political Reform Act because
Consultant’s duties would require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions
Page 10 of 10
set forth in Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation 18701(a) (2) or otherwise serves in a
staff capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were Consultant employed by
the City. Consultant hereby acknowledges his or her assuming-office, annual, and leaving-office
financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict
of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at his or her expense. Prior to
consultant commencing services hereunder, the City’s Manager shall prepare and deliver to
consultant a memorandum detailing the extent of Consultant’s disclosure obligations in
accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code.
City Initials ______
Consultant Initials ______
OR
By their initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant
is not a “consultant” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s
duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of consultant in Fair Political
Practice Commission Regulation 18701(a) (2) (A) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity
in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code.
City Initials ______
Consultant Initials ______
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and
year first hereinabove written.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT
Sergio Gonzalez, City Manager By:
ATTEST:
Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michael Jenkins, City Attorney
DRAFT PSA 19.002
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE PROVISION OF
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR ADA
IMPROVEMENTS ON PROSPECT AVENUE (CIP 17-687 and CIP 18-691) BETWEEN
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC.
This AGREEMENT is entered into this 26th day of March, 2019, by and between the
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a general law city a municipal corporation (“CITY”) and
Transtech Engineers, Inc., a limited liability company (“CONSULTANT”).
R E C I T A L S
A. The City desires to obtain professional services from the Consultant for
construction management and inspection services for ADA Improvements on
Prospect Avenue (CIP 17-687 and CIP 18-681).
B. The City does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services
required under this agreement and therefore, the City desires to contract for
consulting services to accomplish this work.
C. The Consultant warrants to the City that it has the qualifications, experience and
facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, the City and the Consultant
agree as follows:
1. CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION
A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the
SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as EXHIBIT A hereto and incorporated herein
by reference.
B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the
terms and conditions contained in this Agreement.
C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT as set forth in
EXHIBIT A, for CONSULTANT’s services, unless otherwise specified by
written amendment to this Agreement.
D. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless
first approved by the City Manager or his/her designee.
E. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each
month, its invoice for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the
previous month. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT all uncontested amounts set
forth in CONSULTANT’s invoice within 30 days after it is received.
Page 2 of 10
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
A. CONSULTANT will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF
SERVICE attached hereto as Exhibit A.
B. Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY,
CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical,
administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials,
equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary
or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services
required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement.
3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement,
CONSULTANT must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific
tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed
during the billing period in accordance with the schedule of compensation incorporated in
“Exhibit A.”
4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of the CONTRACTOR are to commence upon
receipt of a notice to proceed from the CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is
completed to the CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in
“Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing by the CITY.
5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT
represents that CONSULTANT has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of
services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c)
understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under
this Agreement.
6. KEY PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT’s key person assigned to perform work under this
Agreement is Ali Cayir. CONSULTANT shall not assign another person to be in charge of the
work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City.
7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution
by both parties and have an initial term of 25 working days unless earlier termination occurs under
Section 11 of this Agreement, or this Agreement is extended in writing by mutual agreement as
necessary to complete the project.
8. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this
Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the
contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing,
executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the
services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties.
9. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a
Taxpayer Identification Number.
Page 3 of 10
10. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONTRACTOR will obtain and maintain during the term
of this Agreement all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in
connection with the performance of services under this Agreement.
11. TERMINATION. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at
any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing.
CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days before
the effective termination date.
In the event of such termination, the CONTRACTOR shall cease services as of the date of
termination, and all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other materials
prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and
CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily
completed up to the effective date of notice of termination.
Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own
terms services similar to those terminated.
12. INDEMNIFICATION.
A. CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by CITY, and hold
harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against
all liability, loss, damage, expense, and cost (including without limitation
reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of
every nature arising from third party claims that are out of or in connection with
CONSULTANT's negligent of wrongful performance of work hereunder or its
failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT,
regardless of CITY’S passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage which
is caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY. Should
CITY in its sole discretion find CONSULTANT’S legal counsel unacceptable, then
CONSULTANT shall reimburse the CITY its costs of defense, including without
limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of
litigation. The CONSULTANT shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered
against the CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by
this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing
provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of
the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.
B. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained
by CONSULTANT as required by Section 17, and any approval of said insurance
by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the
liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this
Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning
indemnification.
C. Except to the extent of an indemnification obligation set forth herein, to the
maximum extent allowable under applicable law, CITY agrees that
CONSULTANT shall not be liable for any monetary damages in excess of the
amounts paid to CONSULTANT under this agreement. CITY agrees that
Page 4 of 10
CONSULTANT shall not be liable for lost profits, lost opportunities, consequential
or incidental damages resulting from CONSULTANT’s performance under this
agreement.
13. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT’s professional services.
CONSULTANT’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s
written approval are prohibited and will be null and void.
14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that
CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the
manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be
performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent
or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or
similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may
appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to
exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction
of the CITY as to end results of the work only.
15. AUDIT OF RECORDS.
A. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and
copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT
agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and
will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice,
during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and
inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may
be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining
compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such
records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this
Agreement.
B. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining
to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement.
16. CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective
measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by the City to implement
said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective measures
shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement.
17. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.
A. The CONSULTANT, at the CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense, shall procure
and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies:
1. Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. The Consultant shall
require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance
for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal
Page 5 of 10
of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the CITY at
least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive
all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents, employees,
and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the
CONTRACTOR for City.
2. General Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain
commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than two
million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance
form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under
this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the
required occurrence limit.
3. Automobile Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain
automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage
for all activities of the CONSULTANT arising out of or in connection with
the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for
owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one
million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence.
4. Professional Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain
professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against
claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from
the CONSULTANT’S operations under this Agreement, whether such
operations are by the CONSULTANT or by its employees, subcontractors,
or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one
million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a
combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on
a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the
insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is
terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the
policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover
CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or
omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during
the time this Agreement was in effect.
B. Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability
insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or
companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California, or
which is approved in writing by City, and shall be endorsed as follows.
CONSULTANT also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do
likewise.
1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents,
and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to
liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the
CONSULTANT, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in
Page 6 of 10
connection with such work or operations.”
2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its
elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers.
Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self-insured retention
the CITY may have shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not
contribute with this policy.
3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a
separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits
of liability of the insuring company.
4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or
appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents.
5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not
affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers,
officials, employees, agents, or volunteers.
6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days
written notice has been received by the CITY.
C. CONSULTANT agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss
against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement. CITY
assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty)
to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve
CITY.
D. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the
CITY. At the CITY’s option, the CONSULTANT shall demonstrate financial
capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions.
E. The CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance with original
endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein.
Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the CITY on or before
commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of
insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this
Agreement.
F. Failure on the part of the CONSULTANT to procure or maintain required insurance
shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY may terminate
this Agreement pursuant to Section 11 above.
G. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this
Agreement shall allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured
retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the Consultant (as the
named insured) should Consultant fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements.
The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City
Page 7 of 10
Attorney and the Finance Director. Consultant understands and agrees that
satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the
effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by Consultant as primary insured to pay
its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City
pay the SIR or deductible on Consultant’s behalf upon the Consultant’s failure or
refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional
insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any action
against Consultant for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages
incurred by City due to the breach.
18. USE OF OTHER CONSULTANTS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY’s prior written
approval to use any sub-consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such
approval must include approval of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation.
19. FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the
CONSULTANT of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release
of the CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONSULTANT for anything
done, furnished or relating to the CONSULTANT’S work or services. Acceptance of payment
shall be any negotiation of the CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation
claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment
by the CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of the
CONSULTANT, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for the accuracy and competency of
the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed
to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by the CITY for any defect or error in the
work prepared by the Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents.
20. CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the
CONSULTANT shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during
the City’s review of the Consultant’s report or plans. Should the Consultant fail to make such
correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by the CITY, and the cost
thereof shall be charged to the CONSULTANT. In addition to all other available remedies, the
City may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by the City or may
withhold payment otherwise owed CONSULTANT under this Agreement up to the amount of the
cost of correction.
21. NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONSULTANT by CITY
for services performed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within
an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for
payment of CONSULTANT’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover
payment for CONSULTANT’S services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which
CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such
fiscal year.
Page 8 of 10
22. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made
when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows:
CITY CONSULTANT
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
ATTN: Lucho Rodriguez
Transtech Engineers, Inc
13367 Benson Avenue
Chino, CA 91710
ATTN: Ali Cayir
Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by
the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly
addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual
delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be
given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of notices may
be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or
personally delivered as specified in this Section.
23. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor
retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, to solicit or
secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to
pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting
from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this
warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability.
24. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein are
generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any
other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT’s or
CITY’s obligations under this Agreement.
25. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this
agreement will be in Los Angeles County.
26. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire
understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements
expressed or implied, oral or written.
27. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review
this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a
whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against
either Party.
28. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary
action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to
engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment
with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city manager, or designee, may execute any
such amendment on behalf of CITY.
Page 9 of 10
29. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree
that this Contract, agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into
in connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is
delivered by facsimile transmission or scanned and delivered via electronic mail. Such facsimile
or electronic mail copies will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original
signature.
30. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire,
flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural
elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately
terminate without obligation of either party to the other.
31. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be
provided.
32. ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or
its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation,
drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith
except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the
prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition
to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled.
33. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT
represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity
to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its
financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability,
personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in
dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the
proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy
a public agency.
34. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. It is understood and agreed that the City shall own all
documents and other work product of the Consultant, except the Consultant’s notes and work
papers, which pertain to the work performed under this Agreement. The City shall have the sole
right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the Consultant,
but any re-use of such documents by the City on any other project without prior written consent of
the Consultant shall be at the sole risk of the City.
35. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (City and Consultant initials required at the following
paragraph)
By their initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant
is not a “consultant” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s
duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of consultant in Fair Political
Practice Commission Regulation 18701(a) (2) (A) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in
accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code.
City Initials ______
Consultant Initials ______
Page 10 of 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first
hereinabove written.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT
Mayor By:
ATTEST:
Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michael Jenkins, City Attorney
Due Date: June 25, 2018, 11 am
Submittal includes: 3 hard copies, 1 pdf
S u b m i t t e d B y
TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC.
Contact Person for this Proposal:
Ali Cayir, PE, Principal
ali.cayir@transtech.org
C: 714-883-8677 / O: 909-595-8599
13367 Benson Avenue
Chino CA 91710
www.transtech.org
855.595.2495 (toll-free)
S u b m i t t e d T o
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Office of the City Clerk, 2nd Floor
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Attn: Fabio M. Macias, Project Manager
T E C H N I C A L P R O P O S A L
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES
(RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG NO. 601869-17)
As required, Fee Proposal is submitted in a separate envelope
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
June 25, 2018
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Office of the City Clerk, 2nd Floor
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Attn: Fabio M. Macias, Project Manager
Subject: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES
(RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG NO. 601869-17)
As required, Fee Proposal is submitted in a separate envelope
Dear Mr. Macias:
Transtech is pleased to submit this Technical Proposal to the City for the subject services.
Established in 1989, Transtech Engineers, Inc. (a California Corporation) is a multi-disciplinary engineering
consulting firm which provides full contract municipal engineering services to approximately 25 local
agencies.
Our service capabilities include:
• Municipal Engineering Services, City Engineer, City
Traffic Engineer, Development Review, Public
Works Engineering, Plan Check, Inspection
• Building and Safety Services, Building Inspection,
Plan Check, Building Evaluations, City Building
Official, Code Enforcement
• Staff Augmentation
• CIP Program Management
• Construction Management and Inspection
• Federally Funded Project Management
• Grant Writing
• Labor Compliance
• CDBG Project Management
• Civil Engineering, Freeways and Interchanges, Local
Streets and Roads, Sewerage, Water and Storm Drain,
Pavement Management System, Grading Studies
• Planning Support
• Traffic and Transportation Planning and Engineering
• Water Resources Engineering
• Surveying, Mapping, ALTA, Right-of-way Engineering
• Emergency and Disaster Response, Support and
Recovery Services
Following is a partial listing of Transtech’s recent experience related to similar Projects:
• City of Temple City, FY 16/17 Annual Street Rehabilitation Project, Temple City Bl HSIP and Street Rehab
Project (Federally Funded), El Monte Ave HSIP Projects. Cost: $3m
• City of Commerce, FY 16/17 Annual Street Rehabilitation Project. Cost: $3m
• City of Temple City, FY 15/16 Annual Street Rehabilitation Project. Cost: $1.5m
• City of Commerce, FY 15/16 Annual City-wide Street Rehabilitation Project: Cost $3.7m.
• City of Cudahy, FY 16/17 Annual St Rehab Project, ATP Project (Federally Funded), Cost $1.0m.
• City of San Bernardino, FY 15/16 Annual Street Rehab and ADA sidewalk improvements Project: Cost
$3.5m.
• City of Cudahy, FY 15/16 Annual Residential Streets Rehab and Atlantic Bl Crack Seal Project: Cost
www.transtech.org
855.595.2495 (toll-free)
13367 Benson Avenue
Chino CA 91710
T 909 595 8599; F 909 590 8599
June 25, 2018
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Office of the City Clerk, 2nd Floor
Attn: Fabio M. Macias, Project Manager
Subject: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES
(RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG NO. 601869-17)
As required, Fee Proposal is submitted in a separate envelope
Page 2
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
$0.7m.
• City of Monterey Park, Parking Lot 2, Garvey Ranch Conservation Garden, Langley Sr. Center ADA Rehab
Projects. Cost $1.0m.
• City of Alhambra, FY 16/17 Annual Residential Streets Rehab and Concrete Allery Reconstruction,
Second Street SR2S and Pavement Rehab and Valley/6th HAWK Signal Project. Cost: $2.8m.
We also have extensive experience in managing several large-scale projects (following is a partial listing):
• City of Commerce, Washington Bl Widening, Reconstruction, Beautification, Fed Funded, $38m.
• City of Temple City, Rosemead Bl Bikeway, Reconstruction, Beautification, Fed Funded, $20m.
• City of Pomona, Rte 71/Mission Bl Grade Separation, Fed Funded, $40m.
• City of Moreno Valley, Cactus/Nason Street Improvements, 135’ Span Bridge, SLPP Grant, $21m.
One of the unique qualifications of Transtech and its staff is that we work as Contract City Engineers for
several agencies. We have extensive experience working with Public Agencies in similar assignments,
including experience in dealing with Public Agency Staff, Council, and Commissions. We are accustomed
to working with governmental agencies, and have a good understanding of public agency issues,
procedures, and policies. We have extensive experience in managing contracts as City staff extension
with turn-key service approach.
We believe our team is well qualified to perform the services requested:
✓ Successfully providing similar services to many agencies for nearly 30 years.
✓ Proven track record in on time and within budget project delivery.
✓ Multi-disciplinary engineering consulting service capabilities to provide an array of municipal
services.
✓ Ability to work collaboratively with agencies, project applicants, and other stake holders, and
communicate effectively with diverse audiences and stakeholders at public forums.
✓ Efficient and cost effective, where our base cover various support, oversight, admin services and
we do not burden the City with additional/extra costs.
✓ Committed to producing a high-quality work product and deliver a high level of customer care.
✓ Commitment of principal level management and involvement throughout the contract duration.
✓ Well experienced in-house staff readily available to commence with the services upon City’s
authorization.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Should you have any questions, or require
additional information, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
Ali Cayir, PE, Principal
ali.cayir@transtech.org; O: 909-595-8599; C: 714-883-8677
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Our proposal and Table of Contents is formatted per Section IV. CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL of the RFP.
SECTION PAGE
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.1 – A.16
TRANSTECH A.1
DBE SUBCONSULTANT (Avant-Garde, Inc., CDBG Labor Compliance) A.2
MATERIALS TESTING AND INSPECTION SUBCONSULTANT (Geo-Advantec, Inc.) A.2
REFERENCES FOR SIMILAR PROJECTS (Per RFP, City is requiring maximum 5 project references) A.2
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE A.9
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.1 – B.26
PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART B.1
RESUMES B.1
C. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY C.1 – C.6
GENERAL APPROACH C.1
SCOPE OF WORK C.5
D. PROJECT SCHEDULE D.1 – D.3
E. DBE USE E.1 – E.1
F. CONTRACT F.1 – F.3
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.1
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
TRANSTECH
Company Profile:
Transtech Engineers, Inc. established in 1989, Transtech (a California Corporation) is a
multi-disciplinary engineering consulting firm, which provides engineering services to
approximately 25 local agencies in Greater LA Area. Transtech is an ISO 9001 certified
firm in Quality Management Systems, this certification is based on a number of quality
management principles including a strong customer service focus.
Transtech’s comprehensive service capabilities include:
• Building and Safety Services, Building
Inspection, Plan Check, Building Evaluations,
City Building Official, Code Enforcement
• Municipal Engineering Services, City Engineer,
City Traffic Engineer, Development Review,
Public Works Engineering, Plan Check,
Inspection
• Staff Augmentation
• CIP Program Management
• Construction Management and Inspection
• Federally Funded Project Management
• Grant Writing
• CDBG Project Management
• Labor Compliance
• Civil Engineering, Freeways and Interchanges, Local
Streets and Roads, Sewerage, Water and Storm
Drain, Pavement Management System, Grading
Studies
• Planning Support
• Traffic and Transportation Planning and
Engineering
• Water Resources Engineering
• Surveying, Mapping, ALTA, Right-of-way
Engineering
• Emergency and Disaster Response, Support and
Recovery Services
Local Experience:
Our staff members have extensive experience in the local area, as well as working with local and
regional agencies, including Caltrans, Metro, Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County, Riverside
County, Orange County, and SCAG.
Licenses and Certificates of the Firm and Staff Members in Diversified Fields:
• ICC Certified Building Official
• ICC Certified Sustainability Professional
• CASp, California Access Specialist
• ICC Certified Building, Electrical, Mechanical,
Plumbing Plans Examiner
• Accessibility Plans Examiner
• CalGreen-California Green Building Plan Examiner
• IAPMO Certified Plumbing, Mechanical Inspector CA
Commercial, Res Plumbing Inspector UPC
• CA Residential Mechanical Inspector
• CACEO Certified Code Enforcement Official
• Professional Licensed Engineer (PE, SE, ME, EE)
• Professional Licensed Traffic Engineer (TE)
• Professional Licensed Land Surveyor (PLS)
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.2
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
• ICC Certified Commercial Building, Electrical,
Mechanical, Plumbing Inspector
• Accessibility Inspector
• CalGreen-California Green Building Inspector
• Qualified Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
Developer (QSD); Practitioner (QSP), Industrial
Practitioner (QSIP)
• Licensed General Contractor A and B
Our company and staff members are members or serve on various committees:
• American Public Works Association (APWA)
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
• Construction Management Association of America
(CMAA)
• Chair; ICC Sustainability Membership Council
• Chair; ICC LA Basin Chapter Inspection Committee
• Commissioner; ICC Codes & Standards Council
• Commissioner; CALBO Green Committee
• Commissioner; ICC/CALBO CA Exam Committee
• Commissioner; CALBO Outreach/Communications
Committee
• ICC Los Angeles Basin Chapter Board of Directors
• ICC Building Officials Membership Governing
Council
• ICC Code Development Committee Vice Chair
• ICC Technology/Web Advisory Group
• IAS Accreditation Committee
• ICC LA Chapter Accessibility Committee
DBE SUBCONSULTANT (Avant-Garde, Inc., CDBG Labor Compliance)
For this project, Transtech Team includes the following DBE Firm:
• AVANT-GARDE (DBE Firm); www.agi.com.co; CDBG Labor Compliance.
MATERIALS TESTING AND INSPECTION SUBCONSULTANT (Geo-Advantec, Inc.)
For this project, Transtech Team includes the following Firm for Materials Testing and Inspection:
• GEO-ADVANTEC, INC.: Sub Consultant (Materials Testing and Inspection); www.geoadvantec.com
REFERENCES FOR SIMILAR PROJECTS (Per RFP, City is requiring maximum 5 project references)
REFERENCE 1:
Similar Project:
• FY 15/16, 16/17 St Rehab Project; ATP Signal and Pedestrian Safety Project (Federally Funded);
Atlantic Bl Crack Seal Project. (Total Cost $2.5m)
Reference Contact:
• City of Cudahy; Jose Pulido, City Manager; T: 323-282-5582; E: jpulido@cityofcudahyca.gov
Services Provided:
• Construction Management and Construction Inspection
• Building and Safety Plan Check, Engineering, CIP Design, Federally Funded Project Management
• Year started and completed: 2012 – Ongoing Service
REFERENCE 2:
Similar Project:
• City of Commerce, FY 15/16, 16/17 Annual Street Rehabilitation Project. (Total Cost: $7m)
Reference Contact:
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.3
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
• City of Commerce; Maryam Babaki, PE, PW and Development Services Director; T: 323-722-4805; E:
mbabaki@ci.commerce.ca.us
Services Provided:
• Construction Management and Construction Inspection
• Contract City Engineering, Traffic Engineering, CIP Design, Federally Funded Project Management,
Plan Check
• Year started and completed: 2003 – Ongoing Service
REFERENCE 3:
Similar Project:
• FY 15/16, 16/17 Annual Street Rehabilitation, Temple City Bl HSIP Traffic Signal and Safety and Street
Rehab Project (Federally Funded), El Monte Ave HSIP Projects. (Total Cost $4.5m)
Reference Contact:
• City of Temple City; Michael Forbes, Community Development Director; T: 626-285-2171; E:
mforbes@templecity.us
Services Provided:
• Construction Management and Construction Inspection
• Building Official, Plan Check and Inspection, City Engineering, Traffic Engineering, CIP Design,
Federally Funded Proj Management
• Year started and completed: 2012 – Ongoing Service
REFERENCE 4:
Similar Project:
• FY 16/17 Annual Residential Streets Rehab and Concrete Allery Reconstruction, Second Street SR2S
and Pavement Rehab and Valley/6th HAWK Signal Project. (Total Cost: $2.8m)
Reference Contact:
• City of Alhambra; Marc Castagnola, Development Services Director, 626-570-5041; E:
mcastagnola@cityofalhambra.org
Services Provided:
• Construction Management and Construction Inspection
• Building Official, Plan Check and Inspection, City Engineering, Traffic Engineering, CIP Design,
Federally Funded Proj Management
• Year started and completed: 1993 – Ongoing Service
REFERENCE 5:
Similar Project:
• City of San Bernardino, FY 15/16 Annual Street Rehab and ADA sidewalk improvements Project:
Cost $3.5m
Reference Contact:
• City of San Bernardino; Mark Persico, Development Services Director; T: 909-384-5057; E:
Persico_Ma@sbcity.org
Services Provided:
• Construction Management and Construction Inspection
• Contract Engineering, Interim Building Official, City Engineer, CIP Design, Federally Funded Project
Management, Building and Safety Plan Check and Inspection
• Year started and completed: 2005 – Ongoing Service
Please see attached reference letters from above listed references.
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.4
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.5
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.6
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.7
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.8
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.9
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Following are various additional similar projects where Transtech provided Construction Management
and Inspection Services (Partial List).
26th Street Rehab and Metrolink Station ($1M):
This project was Federally Funded in the City of
Commerce and included rehabilitation of 26th
Street, and Metrolink Station parking lot rehab,
station platform improvements, landscape and
lighting. Transtech prepared the PS&E, as well as
provided construction management, resident
engineer, inspection, labor compliance and office
engineer services.
ATP Citywide Crosswalk and Pedestrian Safety
Improvement Project ($1.2M): Located in the City
of Cudahy, this project included safe routes to
school pedestrian safety improvements near
schools and pedestrian activity centers. Transtech
prepared the PS&E, as well as provided
construction management, resident engineer,
inspection, labor compliance and office engineer
services.
Eastern Avenue Rehab Project ($1.5M): Located in
the City of Commerce, this project was funded thru
City’s Measure AA Funds. The project involved Full
Depth Reclaimed Pavement Rehabilitation.
Transtech prepared the PS&E, as well as provided
construction management, resident engineer,
inspection, labor compliance and office engineer
services.
AWARD: This project was recognized as one
of the project of the year awards as part of
the 2017 Outstanding Local Streets and
Roads Project Award Program in the
Category of Roads for Efficient & Sustainable
Road Maintenance, Construction &
Reconstruction Projects.
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.10
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
El Monte, Temple City Blvd, and Various Citywide
Locations HSIP Projects ($1.8M): Located in the
City of Temple City, this project was a Federally
Funded through Highway Safety Improvement
Project (HSIP) program. It included asphalt
roadway resurfacing, markings & striping, traffic
safety improvements such as updated traffic signal
heads and speed radar feedback signs, and
updated street signage. Transtech prepared the
PS&E, as well as provided construction
management, resident engineer, inspection, labor
compliance and office engineer services.
Middleton Street Elementary School Safe Routes
to School Improvements Project ($500K): Located
in the City of Huntington Park, this project was part
of the Safe Route to School program and included
pedestrian safety improvements, bulb outs, ADA
compliant PCC curb ramps, sidewalk
improvements, updated signage, striping and
markings. Transtech prepared the PS&E, as well as
provided construction management, resident
engineer, inspection, labor compliance and office
engineer services.
Rte 71/Mission Bl Grade Separation Project
($40M): This project was a Federally Funded
project located the City of Pomona and included
construction of a bridge/grade separation.
Transtech provided construction management,
resident engineer, inspection, labor compliance
and office engineer services. Caltrans was the
oversight/jurisdictional Agency.
Rosemead Boulevard Improvements Project
($20M): Located in the City of Temple City, this was
a Federally Funded project. Transtech provided
construction management, resident engineer,
inspection, labor compliance and office engineer
services. The project included protected bike lanes,
widening and reconstruction of 2 miles of roadway
(including approx. 6,000 tons rubberized AC
overlay).
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.11
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Washington Boulevard Widening and
Reconstruction Project ($38M): Located in the City
of Commerce, this was a Federally Funded project
Transtech provided construction management,
resident engineer, inspection, labor compliance
and office engineer services. The project included
the widening and reconstruction of 2.7 miles of
Roadway (including approx. 3,500 tons rubberized
AC overlay).
AWARD: This project was recognized as one
of the project of the years as part of the 2017
American Public Works Association (APWA)
BEST Award, in the category of
Transportation Projects.
Cactus Avenue and Nason Street Improvements
and 135’ Span Bridge Project ($21M): This project
was part of the State Local Partnership Program
SLPP Grant in the City of Moreno Valley ($21M).
Transtech provided construction management,
resident engineer, inspection, and office engineer
services.
AWARD: This project was recognized with a
project achievement award by the
Construction Management Association of
America (CMAA) for Construction
Management Services under the Public
Works Category for $11M-$50M ranged
projects.
Temple City Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation
Project ($900K): Located in the City of Temple City,
this project included citywide construction of slurry
seal to various streets. Transtech prepared the
PS&E, as well as provided construction
management, resident engineer, inspection, labor
compliance and office engineer services.
Via Duct Boulevard/2nd St Realignment and
Metrolink Parking Facility ($6M): This project was
Federally Funded and located in the City of San
Bernardino. Transtech provided construction
management, resident engineer, inspection, and
office engineer services.
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.12
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Slauson Avenue ADA Improvements and Tree
Replacement Project ($1.5M): Located in the City
of Commerce, this project was funded thru City’s
Measure AA Funds. The project included removal
of 149 overgrown Ficus trees that displaced the
sidewalk in some areas up to 2 feet high and
replaced them with new ADA compliant sidewalk
and planted 433 drought tolerant trees in their
place. Transtech prepared the PS&E, as well as
provided construction management, resident
engineer, inspection, labor compliance and office
engineer services.
Parking Lot Improvements Projects ($550K):
Located in the City of Temple City, this project
included new parking lot signage, asphalt
resurfacing, construction of trellis, new lighting,
electrical vehicle charging station infrastructure,
landscaping, and drainage. Transtech provided
design, construction management, and inspection
services.
Bogert Trail Bridge Widening Project ($5M):
Located in the City of Palm Springs, this project was
a Federally Funded project. Transtech provided
construction management, resident engineer,
inspection, labor compliance and office engineer
services. The project involved bridge widening,
retrofit, and beautification elements.
Transtech also has extensive experience in Large/Complex Building Projects
City of Alhambra, Civic Center Library Project
($25M): Transtech provided plan check, inspection,
construction management and owner
representative services, the project included
construction of a 45,000 SF Library with an
underground parking garage.
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.13
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Renaissance Plaza ($15M): This project was
located in the City of Alhambra and included a
parking structure, 10 plex movie theater, retail, and
plaza. Transtech served as the City’s Building
Official, Plan Checker and Inspector for this project
including construction manager of the parking
structure, public plaza, and other improvements.
Rosewood Community Center ($25M): Transtech
was retained by the City of Commerce to take over
the management of this multimillion dollar facility
which was 2 years behind schedule. Within 5
months, Transtech brought the construction to
substantial completion level allowing the City to
start the move-in process, and 2 months after, the
facility was opened for public use.
Garfield Avenue Parking Structure: This project
included a 5-story level, 600 space parking
structure as part of the Alhambra Redevelopment
Agency and Downtown Redevelopment. Transtech
provided plan check, inspection, construction
management and owner representative services.
First Street Parking Structure ($2.5M): This project
is in the City of Alhambra and included a 4-story
level, 276 space parking structure. Transtech
provided plan check, inspection, construction
management and owner representative service.
City of Commerce City Hall Addition ($8M): This
project included construction of 20,000 SF addition
to existing the City Hall. Transtech provided
construction management and inspection services.
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.14
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
820 Mission Development LLC (Project Value:
$10M): Located at 820 Mission St. Transtech
provided full plan review as well as inspection
services of for this development which includes
construction of new office building with one
residential unit above, new 15 unit townhome
cluster with office fronting Mission Street with one-
level subterranean parking, convert existing 3-story
industrial building into 9 residential units, construct
13 townhome units. This project is located in South
Pasadena.
Temple City Camellia Square (Project Value:
$15M): Transtech provided full plan review as well
as inspection services, the project included a
shopping center with an underground garage and 4
total buildings as follows: a one-story 6,600 SF
building; a two-story 25,700 SF building, a two-
story 4,500 SF building; and, a two-story 43,400 SF
building.
Linden Walk Residential Development (Project
Value: $18.5M): Transtech provided full plan
review as well as inspection services for this
development which included 74 Single Family
Dwellings. This project is located in Temple City.
Blossom Walk Residential Development (Project
Value: $5.7M): Transtech provided full plan review
as well as inspection services of for this
development which includes 24-unit
condominiums and 4 single family homes. This
project is located in Temple City.
The Terraces (Mixed-Use Development (Project
Value: $19M): Located at 5935-5953 Temple City
Blvd in Temple City. Transtech is currently
providing full plan review for the 4 Story Mixed-Use
Development which includes a one level basement
garage, 61 condominium units as well as ground
level and basement parking and 7,250 SF of
commercial retail space/restaurant.
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.15
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
The Alhambra (Project Value: $57.8M): Located at
88 S Garfield Avenue, 2 S Garfield Avenue, 100 &
150 E Main St. Transtech provided full plan review
as well as inspection services of for this
development which includes 260 apartment units,
4-story parking garage, 72,000 sq ft 2-story retail
building, 16,730 sq ft 1-story retail building, and
23,000 sq ft 1-story retail building. This project is
located in Alhambra.
Midwick Collection (Project Value: $13M): Located
at 2400 S Fremont Avenue. Transtech provided full
plan review as well as inspection services of for this
development which includes 36 single family
dwellings and 28 townhomes. This project is
located in Alhambra.
Casita de Zen (Project Value: $21M): Located at 28
N 3rd St (condo) and 235 W Main St (retail).
Transtech provided full plan review as well as
inspection services of for this development which
includes mixed use project with 92 condos on top,
and retail on bottom. This project is located in
Alhambra.
Pacific Plaza (Project Value: $30.3M): Located at
11 S 3rd St (condo) and 300 W Main St (retail).
Transtech provided full plan review as well as
inspection services of for this development which
includes 120 condo units and retail space below.
This project is located in Alhambra.
Alta Med Medical Group (Project Value: $4M):
Located at 1900 E Slauson Ave. Transtech provided
full plan review as well as inspection services of for
this development which includes a new mixed-use
building of office space and an adult day care with
new on grade parking. This project is located in
Huntington Park.
Transtech also provided Map Check Services
including review of Tentative Parcel Map and Final
Parcel Map for this project.
A. COMPANY OVERVIEW A.16
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Main Street Collection (Project Value: $23M):
Located at 410 W Main Street. Transtech provided
full plan review as well as inspection services of for
this development which includes 4-story mixed-use
project with 8,200 s ft retail space, 52 condos, 9
live/work units, 19 townhomes, and 6 shopkeeper
units. This project is located in Alhambra.
DaVita Alhambra Dialysis Center (Project Value:
$2M): Located at 1237 E Main St. Transtech
provided full plan review as well as inspection
services of for this development which includes 1-
story 14,125 sq ft medical office. This project is
located in Alhambra.
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.1
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART
RESUMES
Resumes are provided in the following pages.
Ali Cayir, PE
Sr. Engineer
Contract Principal
Kev Tcharkhoutian, PE,
Sr. Eng in charge of Project and
Inspection
Jeffrey Hirsh
Inspection Support
Mario Magliocchetti
Inspection Support
Al Pagani
Sr. Constr. Manager, Sr.
Supervising Inspector
AVANT-GARDE (DBE Firm)
www.agi.com.co
CDBG Labor Compliance
Okan Demirci, MBA, EIT
Proj. Manager, Project
Controls
Geo-Advantec, Inc.
(Sub Consultant)
Materials Testing and
Inspection
www.geoadvantec.com
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.2
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
ALI CAYIR, PE, Sr. Engineer, Contract Principal
EDUCATION
• BS Engineering
• MBA
• Project/Construction
Management, UC Irvine
REGISTRATION
• Registered Civil Engineer
• Licensed Gen Contractor A
• Licensed Gen Contractor B
HIGHLIGHTS
• 30 years of experience in
City Engineering.
• Served as contract City
Engineer and City Traffic
Engineer for many Cities.
• City of Alhambra-Contract
City Engineer/City Traffic
Engineer.
• City of Hanford-Former City
Traffic Engineer.
• City of La Habra Heights-
Former City and Traffic
Engineer
• City of Pomona-Former
Interim City Engineer.
• City of Commerce-Assistant
Public Services/City PW
Engineer.
• Extensive experience in
grant programs. Secured
over $20m in funding for
during last 2 cycles of MTA
Call for Projects
Applications.
• Extensive experience in
working with Caltrans,
Mr. Cayir has over 30 years of experience in engineering. He has parti cipated on
numerous multi-disciplinary teams dealing with the planning and development of
civil and traffic engineering, urban and rural development, and public works projects.
He served as Principal Project Manager for the design, construction and management
of a variety of projects, including:
• Public Works and Infrastructure Improvements
• Educational and University Campuses
• Institutional
• Commercial and Retail
• Transportation and Parking Facilities
• Residential and Master Community Development
Mr. Cayir served as contract City Engineer, Traffic Engineer and Interim Public Works
Director for many municipalities in Southern California. He has a broad knowledge
of municipal government operations, including preparation and presentation of staff
reports/resolutions to city councils, committees and interaction with public, various
city departments, city council and other governmental agencies.
Municipal Engineering Assignments (past and present)
• City of Alhambra-Contract City Engineer/City Traffic Engineer
• City of Temple City-Contract City Engineer/City Traffic Engineer
• City of Commerce-Interim City Engineer/City Traffic Engineer/PW Director
• City of Hanford-City Traffic Engineer
• City of La Habra Heights-City Engineer/City Traffic Engineer
• City of Pomona-Interim City Engineer
• City of Commerce, Interim W Director/City Engineer/Traffic Engineer
• City of Bellflower, Deputy City Engineer
• City of Cudahy, CIP Manager
• City of San Bernardino, CIP Manager
• City of Huntington Park, City Engineer
Construction Management Experience
Mr. Cayir has served as CM, PM, RE for numerous construction projects. He has
extensive experience in Federally Funded Projects. Mr. Cayir also served as contract
City Engineer for many municipalities. Some of the significant projects where Mr.
Cayir served as CM/PM/RE/Project Principal include:
• Washington Boulevard Widening and Reconstruction Project (Federally Funded),
City of Commerce ($30m). Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector,
Office Engineer Services. The project includes widening and reconstruction of
2.7 miles of Roadway (including approx. 3,500 tons rubberized AC overlay). The
project is federally funded and being managed in compliance with Caltrans Local
Assistance Procedures Manual.
• Rosemead Boulevard Improvements Project, City of Tempe City (Federally
Funded) ($20m). Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office
Engineer Services. The project included widening and reconstruction of 2 miles
of roadway (including approx. 6,000 tons rubberized AC overlay). The project was
federally funded and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance
Procedures Manual.
• Cactus Avenue and Nason Street Improvements and 135’ Span Bridge Project,
City of Moreno Valley ($21m). Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer,
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.3
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
County of Los Angeles and
other regional agencies and
Utility Companies.
• Extensive experience in
NPDES requirements.
• Extensive experience in the
management and
administration of federally
and state funded projects in
compliance with Caltrans
Local Assistance Procedures
Manual (LAPM).
• Served as Resident Engineer
on several Federally Funded
Projects.
Inspector, Office Engineer Services. The funding included State Local Partnership
Program (SLPP) grant and was inspected and managed in compliance with
Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
• Rte 71/Mission Bl Grade Separation Project (Federally Funded) City of Pomona
($40m). Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer
Services. Project was inspected and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local
Assistance Procedures Manual. Caltrans was the oversight/jurisdictional Agency.
• Bogert Trail Bridge Widening Project (Federally Funded), City of Palm Springs
($5m). Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer
Services. The project is federally funded and being managed in compliance with
Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
• Eastern Avenue Street Rehab Project, City of Commerce ($1.5m). Transtech
provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer Services. Funded by
Measure AA Funds. Project is being inspected and managed in compliance with
Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Project involved Full Depth
Reclaimed Pavement Rehabilitation.
• 2016 Street Rehab Project, City of Commerce ($4m). Transtech provided Design
and CM, Inspection Services.
• SR2S, BTA and Pavement Rehabilitation Projects (State Funded), City of Temple
City ($2m). Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office
Engineer Services. Project was inspected and managed in compliance with
Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Project involved pavement
rehabilitation (rubberized AC overlay), curb and gutter, sidewalk, traffic signals,
utilities, and other misc. improvements.
• 710 Freeway Interim Improvements and Fremont Widening Project (Federally
Funded), City of Alhambra ($15m). Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer,
Inspector, Office Engineer Services. Project was inspected and managed in
compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Project also
involved coordination with Caltrans for work at the 710 Freeway ramps under
Caltrans Encroachment Permit.
• Via Duct Boulevard/2nd St Realignment and Metrolink Parking Facility, City of San
Bernardino ($6m). Provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer
Services. Project was inspected and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local
Assistance Procedures Manual.
• New Avenue, from North to South City Limit Rehabilitation and ADA
Improvements Project (Federally Funded), City of Alhambra ($2m). Provided
CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer Services. Project was
inspected and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures
Manual.
• Garfield Rehabilitation and ADA Improvements Project (Federally Funded),
Alhambra ($2m). Provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer
Services. Project was inspected and managed in compliance with Caltrans Lo cal
Assistance Procedures Manual.
• Main Street Rehabilitation, from West to East City Limit Project, City of Alhambra
($3m). Provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer Services.
Project was inspected and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance
Procedures Manual.
• CSUSB (Cal State SB University) San Bernardino Main Access Road: Prepared
PS&E and provided construction administration for the project. Cost $5m.
• City of Commerce, Rosewood Community Center. Transtech was retained by the
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.4
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
City to take over the management of this multimillion dollar facility which was 2
years behind schedule. Within 5 months, Transtech brought the construction to
substantial completion level allowing the City to start the move-in process, and
2 months after, the facility was opened to public use. Currently, Transtech is
assisting the City in claims analysis and change order resolution. Construction
Cost: $15m.
• City of Alhambra Downtown Revitalization Program: Involved 11 projects,
including Renaissance Plaza (multi-plex theater, public plaza with fountain and
unique art features, restaurants, retail, 800 space parking structure), Fremont
Plaza (modifications/reconstruction of existing buildings for lease by ToysRUs
and Party City, construction of a new 30,000 SF store for PetSmart, and various
other retail buildings) and Downtown Revitalization (modification/upgrade of
existing buildings for Starbucks, 4 Restaurants and various retail businesses).
(Cost: $80m).
• City of Alhambra 4 parking structures: Transtech served as turn-key project
manager, including management of design, construction, building plan check and
inspection, federal funds, labor compliance for 4 parking structure projects.
Chapel: 4 stories, 300 space structure; First Street: 4 stories, 276 space structure;
Garfield: 5 stories, 800 space structure. Cost $15m; North First Street Mosaic: 5
stories, 320 space structure, Cost $6m.
Civil Engineering Experience
• I-710 Freeway Interim Improvements and Fremont Widening and
Reconstruction: Transtech provided Turn-key Services, including Program
Management, Construction Management, Design, Surveying, Right -of-Way
Engineering, and Environmental. The project included major roadway
improvements, removal/demolition of various buildings for additional right -of-
way and reconstruction of buildings behind new right-of-way, traffic signals,
infrastructure, utilities, pavement, drainage, water, sewer, landscape, street
lighting, traffic signal, pavement improvements. Project was funded by Federal
Funds, and was managed and inspected in compliance with Caltrans Local
Assistance Procedures Manual. (Cost $15m).
• University Park Development/San Bernardino: The project included 2 miles of
new roadway, sewer, water, utility and extensive hill side grading for a master
planned residential and commercial development on 130 -acre site across from
the San Bernardino State University. Cost $40m.
• City of Torrance, Crenshaw Reconstruction, Skypark Improvements,
190th/Crenshaw Widening: Design, construction management services,
including inspection, surveying, resident engineer, federal compliance, labor
compliance. Project was funded by Federal Funds, and was managed and
inspected in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
Cost: $5 m.
• Valley Boulevard Widening and Reconstruction project which is funded by State
and Federal funds and required complete project and environmental report,
including Right-of-Way, Relocation, SHPO, NEPA, SEQA, Noise, Parking,
Economic, Hazardous Materials technical studies, and processed through
Caltrans and FHWA. Construction cost ($6m).
• Carlsbad to San Diego Rail Trail Project Report, which is funded by State and
Federal funds and required complete project and environmental report,
including Right-of-Way, Relocation, SHPO, NEPA, SEQA, Noise, Parking,
Economic, Hazardous Materials technical studies, and processed through
Caltrans and FHWA.
• City of Commerce’s Tubeway and Yates Avenue Rehabilitation Project. The
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.5
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
projects involved roadway rehabilitation and reconstruction. Transtech also
provided construction management services for the project. Cost: $300,000.
• City of San El Monte Annual Street Rehabilitation Program, 98, 99, 00, 01. The
projects involved roadway rehabilitation and reconstruction, storm drain, water
and sewer design on various streets. Cost: $3,000,000.
• Alameda Corridor Agency East (ACE) Rail Grade Crossing Improvement Project
encompassing 6 agencies and 14 locations in Los Angeles County. Work involved
roadway realignment and reconstruction, signalization, traffic control, and
construction phasing as well as related improvements such as storm drain, water,
sewer landscaping, underground utilities, etc. Cost $5,000,000.
• City of Alhambra Annual Street Rehabilitation Program, 94 through 01. The
projects involved roadway rehabilitation and reconstruction, storm drain, water
and sewer design on various streets. Transtech also provided construction
management services for the project. Project Cost: $3,000,000. Project Principal
for design of City of San Clemente’s annual street rehabilitation program. The
project involved roadway rehabilitation and reconstruction, storm drain, water
and sewer design on various streets. Cost $1,000,000.
• Reconstruction and rehabilitation of Crenshaw Boulevard and Skypark Avenue
(two separate projects) in the City of Torrance. Cost $3,000,000.
• Valley Boulevard street medians, striping, landscape, and irrigation
improvements, Alhambra, Cost $600,000.
Traffic Engineering Experience
• Design and management of a variety of traffic and transportation engineering
projects, including traffic signals (more than 1000 locations), traffic signal
interconnect system, street lighting, traffic control, signing and striping design;
signal timing and coordination studies; traffic signal management studies; traffic
safety projects (OTS) including traffic control device inventories and speed
surveys; traffic impact and parking studies for more than 100 proj ects; and
feasibility studies for traffic control measures, freeway access, bikeways and
street improvements. Mr. Cayir has also served as consultant Traffic Engineer for
various agencies in Southern California.
• Project Manager/Engineer for the preparation of ramp metering, count station,
traffic signal, highway lighting, sign lighting, construction signing, pavement
delineation, communication, and other traffic related plans for several state
highways and freeway improvement projects involving Caltrans Districts 7, 8 and
12.
• Project Manager for the preparation of traffic signal modifications and
installation, interconnect and radio corrected time base system installation plans
and estimates in conjunction with traffic signal synchronization projects for
various arterials in Los Angeles County including Garvey Avenue, El Segundo
Boulevard, Crenshaw Boulevard, Slauson Avenue, Rosecrans Avenue, Arrow
Highway and Huntington Drive/Alosta Avenue/Foothill Boulevard. Signal
modification improvements included equipment upgrades, signal phasing
upgrades and installation of radio correct time base units (WWV) for signal
coordination as well as physical intersection improvements.
• Project Manager for the preparation of signal timing and coordination plans for
multiple locations on major arterials in Los Angeles County including Main Street,
Garvey Avenue, Crenshaw Boulevard and Slauson Avenue utilizing state -of-the-
art computer software.
• Project Traffic Engineer for the proposed Materials Recovery Facility in the City
of Industry. This project involved the preparation of a comprehensive area wide
traffic impact study to identify the potential impacts associated with
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.6
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
development of a proposed Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) in the City of
Industry. The study area encompassed 32 intersections and several freeways
such as SR 60 and SR 57. The study also included an evaluation of cumulative
impacts associated with 22 planned projects located within the sphere of
influence of the study area. In addition, separate analyses w ere conducted to
determine the potential impacts of developing the MRF at alternative sites.
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.7
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
KEV TCHARKHOUTIAN, PE, Sr. Eng in charge of Project and Inspection
EDUCATION
• Bachelor of Science in Civil
and Environmental
Engineering
REGISTRATION
• Registered Civil Engineer
HIGHLIGHTS
• Approximately 35 years of
experience in public works
and city engineering.
• Experience includes working
at various Cities as City
Engineer, Interim PW
Director, Designer, Plan
Checker, CIP Manager,
Construction Manager.
Mr. Tcharkhoutian has approximately 35 years of experience in public works and city
engineering. His experience includes working at various Cities as City Engineer,
Interim PW Director, Designer, Plan Checker, CIP Manager, Construction Manager. He
is very familiar with the local and regional agencies and policies. He has a broad
knowledge of municipal government operations, including preparation and
presentation of staff reports/resolutions to city councils, committees and interaction
with public, various city departments, city council and other governmental agencies.
Mr. Tcharkhoutian’s experience includes:
City Engineer - City of South El Monte
• Report to City Manager, prepare staff reports to City Council.
• Manage CIP Projects.
• Review and approve developments, tentative maps, grading plans.
Plans examiner - City of Baldwin Park
• Review Tract and parcel maps for condo conversions and PD’s
Plans examiner City of Montebello
• Review grading plans for conformance with city ordinances and LID
Interim Public Works Manager- City of Duarte
• Work under Community Development Director, at implementing the City’s CIP,
and review subdivision maps , lot line adjustments and developments for
conformance to City’s ordinances
Plans Examiner City of Vernon, Building and safety
• Review plans for commercial and industrial projects for compliance with City’s
ordinances, pertaining to grading plans, development requirements and LID.
Phase 1 assessment review
Plans Examiner, County of Riverside , Building and Safety
• Reviewed plans for new developments for compliance with County’s ordinances
pertaining to grading plans, LID and hydrology studies
Project Manager, City of Wildomar
• Project Manager working with staff on reviewing developments
• Project Manager on the City’s Grand Ave Bike path project
• Project Manager for the City’s Bundy Canyon Transportation Safety Improvement
project
Project Manager, Construction Management, City of Colton
• Project Manager/ Construction Management Consultant, for Sewer Lining
project under I-10 freeway. Provide construction management services for the
installation of CIPP ( cast in place pipe) for 18 inch sewer main under Interstate
10 at 11th Street in the City of Colton, San Bernardino County
• Project Manager, Construction Management Consultant , Sewer Force Main
construction Project on Agua Mansa Rd . Provided construction management
services for the construction of an 8 inch sewer force main 2.5 miles long on
Agua Mansa Rd in the City of Colton , San Bernardino County
Principal Engineer CIP PLANS EXAMINER , City of South Gate
• Provide staff augmentation to the Public Works Department by providing
services in a Principal Engineer capacity. Services included writing RFP’s for CIP
projects, reviewing PS&E packages for Quality assurance and technical accuracy
and constructability.
Principal Engineer CIP and Land Development-City of Maywood
• Provide staff augmentation assistance in the areas of CIP and land development
• Design Maywood Ave pedestrian Improvements – Review daily requests by
residents
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.8
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
• Review feasibility of Mayflower Ave street improvements
Design Engineer, University of Southern California
• Design and provide construction management for the removal and reconstruction of
high voltage electrical vaults and manholes. Designed new vaults and manholes to be
installed while system is hot.
Interim Deputy City Manager for Community Development/Public Works
Director/City Engineer , City of El Monte
• Report to City Manager; Lead the Community Development Department with its
seven divisions , prepare staff reports to City Council, design and administer
street improvement projects funded by CDBG, SAFETEA LU, and GAS TAX.
Manage water, sewer, storm drain, and traffic projects.
• Lead a successful effort at establishing the first Citywide sewer assessment
district and enterprise fund
• Approve developments, tentative maps, grading plans, establish assessment
districts.
• Manage the engineering and public works maintenance departments,
comprised of the street, water, storm drain , sewer, facilitie s, traffic signal, and
graffiti divisions. Manage staff of 50.
Public Works Director /City Engineer, City of Sierra Madre
• Report to City Manager, prepare staff reports to City Council, and manage a staff
of 25.
• Manage water, sewer, street, storm drain projects.
• Approve developments, tentative maps, grading plans.
• Manage and direct corporate yard operations, in street, sewer, water, street
sweeping, storm drains maintenance. Manage safety on the jobsite program .
City Engineer, City of Baldwin Park
• Report to City Manager, write staff reports to City Council. Manage a staff of 7.
• Manage street, sewer, storm drain, traffic projects, FAU, GAS TAX, projects.
• Approve developments, tentative maps, grading plans.
• Direct operations of the corporate yards in street, sewer maintenance
Associate Engineer, City of Monrovia
• Manage street, sewer, water, traffic, storm drain projects
• Review developments, tentative maps, grading plans, assessment districts.
Assistant Civil Engineer, City of Ontario
• Design and administration of street, sewer, storm drain, and water projects
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.9
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
AL PAGANI, Sr. Construction Manager, Sr. Supervising Inspector
EDUCATION
• BA
• MBA
CERTIFICATIONS
• DBIA
• USGBC
• LCI
• ACI
• AISC
HIGHLIGHTS
• 35 years of construction
experience serving as job
superintendent and
construction manager.
• Significant experience in the
construction of affordable
housing and mixed-use
projects for non-profit
corporations, for-profit
developers, and public
agencies.
• Constructed over 2,000
housing units including
rental apartments,
townhomes, condominiums,
and transitional housing for
families, seniors, and
persons with special needs.
• Familiar with various
funding sources for these
projects, including State and
Local Housing and
Redevelopment Programs,
Low Income Housing Tax
Credits, Tax Exempt Bonds
Mr. Pagani’s career spans 35 years in a supervisory capacity in Southern California
involving all aspects of construction. His career includes all levels of construction
including all aspects of residential construction, major project construction such as
new school construction, school modernization, medical buildings, higher education
facilities, major public projects including such project as historical restoration and
adaptive reuse projects, libraries, civic centers and in the private sector from
conceptual and planning to completion of construction.
Mr. Pagani has worked for Transtech for 10 years, and served as Sr. Construction
Inspector and/or Construction Manager for a number of projects. Some of the
significant projects are listed below:
• Washington Boulevard Widening and Reconstruction Project (Federally
Funded), City of Commerce ($30m). Currently providing CM/Resident
Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer Services. The project includes widening
and reconstruction of 2.7 miles of Roadway (including approx. 3,500 tons
rubberized AC overlay). The project is federally funded and being managed
in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
• Eastern Avenue Street Rehab Project, City of Commerce. Transtech provided
CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer Services. Funded by
Measure AA Funds. Project is being inspected and managed in compliance
with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Project involved Full
Depth Reclaimed Pavement Rehabilitation.
• SR2S, BTA and Pavement Rehabilitation Projects (State Funded), City of
Temple City. Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office
Engineer Services. Project was inspected and managed in compliance with
Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Project involved pavement
rehabilitation (rubberized AC overlay), curb and gutter, sidewalk, traffic
signals, utilities, and other misc. improvements.
• 710 Freeway Interim Improvements and Fremont Widening Project
(Federally Funded), City of Alhambra. Transtech provided CM/Resident
Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer Services. Project was inspected and
managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
• Rosecrans Roadway Widening, 405 Freeway Ramp Widening, (Federally
Funded), City of Hawthorne. Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer,
Inspector, Office Engineer Services. Project was inspected and managed in
compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
• City Hall Addition, City of Commerce ($6m). Transtech served as
construction manager. The project involved construction of a new 20,000
SF addition to the City Hall and remodel of existing City Hall.
• Construction Manager/Sr. Inspector for San Bernardino, Santa Fe Historic
Train Depot Renovation. Services included management of design architect,
construction management and inspection. The project involved hazardous
material abatement, building renovation, TI improvements, seismic and
structural upgrade, new mechanical, electrical HVAC system and site
improvements to renovate and reuse a 60,000 SF existing building.
Transtech was awarded “Excellence in Transportation” award by Caltrans in
2005 for this project.
• University Park Development Project in the City of San Bernardino.
Transtech served as construction manager. The project included grading,
roadway, infrastructure, drainage, water, sewer, improvements related to a
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.10
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
and Conventional Financing,
Historic Tax Credits, and
HUD Section 202 & Section
811 Programs.
• Experience includes both
working for public agencies
and private sector.
residential and commercial site development. Transtech also provided civil
engineering design services for the project.
• Construction Manager for City of Commerce, City Hall Addition and Library
Modification. Transtech served as construction manager. The project
involved construction of a new 20,000 SF addition to the City Hall and
remodel of existing City Hall and modifications to existing Library as
necessary.
• Construction Manager for San Bernardino, Santa Fe Historic Train Depot
Renovation. Services included management of design architect,
construction management and inspection. The project involved hazardous
material abatement, building renovation, TI improvements, seismic and
structural upgrade, new mechanical, electrical HVAC system and site
improvements to renovate and reuse a 60,000 SF existing building.
Transtech was awarded “Excellence in Transportation” award by Caltrans in
2005 for this project.
• Construction Manager for University Park Development Project in the City
of San Bernardino. The project included grading, roadway, infrastructure,
drainage, water, sewer, improvements related to a residential and
commercial site development. Transtech also provided civil engineering
design services for the project.
• Construction Manager for Valley, I-710 Freeway Interim Improvements and
Fremont Widening and Reconstruction in the City of Alhambra. Services
included design, construction management, and inspection. The projects
included grading, major roadway improvements, including
removal/demolition of various buildings for additional right-of-way and
reconstruction of buildings behind new right-of-way, infrastructure, utilities,
pavement, drainage, water, sewer, landscape, street lighting, traffic signal,
pavement improvements. Projects were funded by Federal Funds, and was
managed and inspected in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance
Procedures Manual in compliance with Federal Funding Requirements.
Coordinated with project participants, including Caltrans, County of Los
Angeles, City of Alhambra and MTA.
• Construction Manager for City of Hawthorne-Rosecrans roadway widening,
405 Freeway ramp widening. Transtech served as construction manager,
including inspection, surveying, resident engineer, federal compliance, labor
compliance.
• Construction Manager for City of Alhambra First Street Parking Structure (4
story 276 spaces). Transtech served as turn-key program manager, including
design, construction management, building plan check and inspection.
• Construction Manager for City of Alhambra 45,000 sf Public Library and 2
Level 200 car Underground Parking Garage. The project included extensive
grading for 2 levels of underground garage, shoring, 2 story librar y, 2 levels
of underground parking garage, utilities, street paving, sidewalk, and
landscape. Transtech served as turn-key program manager, including
design, construction management, building plan check and inspection.
• Construction Manager for City of Alhambra Utilities Department Customer
Service Building. Transtech served as turn-key program manager, including
design, construction management, building plan check and inspection.
Mr. Pagani’s experience with other firms include:
As a contractor, Al also has significant experience in the construction of
affordable housing and mixed use projects for non-profit corporations, for-
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.11
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
profit developers, and public agencies. He constructed over 2,000 housing
units including rental apartments, townhomes, condominiums, and
transitional housing for families, seniors, and persons with special needs. He is
very familiar with various funding sources for these projects, including State
and Local Housing and Redevelopment Programs, Low Income Housing Tax
Credits, Tax Exempt Bonds and Conventional Financing, Historic Tax Credits,
and HUD Section 202 & Section 811 Programs. Some of recent projects
completed by Al include:
• Bell Air Summit Apartments 30 Retrofit and renovate units of two-story
apartments / town homes.
• San Pablo Senior Apartments 82 Unit Senior Apartment Building 1 story
podium parking deck.
• Villa Santa Fe Apartments 81 affordable apartments complex comprised of
10 building with pool and playground amenities.
• Vinton Avenue Apartments 35-Unit four-story apartment complex over two
levels of subterranean parking.
• Los Angeles Unified School District, Valley Region Elementary School No. 10
Project, 52,000-SF, 25 million dollar K-12 project. Winnetka, CA
• Los Angeles Unified School District, Valley Region Elementary School No. 12
Project, 50,000-SF, 28 million dollar K-12 project. North Hills, CA
• Los Angeles Unified School District, Central Region MacArthur Park
Elementary School Addition, a 37,400-SF, 18 million dollar K-12 project. Los
Angeles, CA
• Los Angeles Pierce College, Center for the Sciences, 100,000-SF, 43 million
dollar classroom and laboratory project. Woodland Hills, CA
• Los Angeles City College, Martin Luther King Library. 40,000-SF, 25 million
dollar library and classroom project. Los Angeles, CA
• Los Angeles City College, Science and Technology classroom, 48,000-SF, 24
million dollar classroom and laboratory project. Los Angeles, CA
• West Los Angeles Community College Math and Science Buildings, 60,000-
SF, 40 million dollar classroom and laboratory project. Culver City, CA
• West Los Angeles Community College General Classrooms and Student
Services Buildings, 100,000-SF, 43 million dollar project. Culver City, CA
• Los Angeles Mission College, Family and Consumer Studies Building, 73,000-
SF, 39 million dollar culinary arts project. Sylmar, CA
• Garfield Renaissance Center. This multi-prime project involves 11 separate
contracts to construct a 800 car 5 level parking structure, 150 car surface
parking lot, a public plaza with fountain and u nique art features, multi-plex
theater, restaurant and retail buildings, and street improvements consisting
of roadway widening, storm drain, sewer, water main, utilities (35 million).
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.12
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
JEFFREY HIRSH, Sr. Inspector, Inspection Support
HIGHLIGHTS
• 30 years of experience in
general engineering/public
works and building
construction projects.
• Worked as PW inspector for
a number of agencies under
Transtech Contracts.
• Experience includes all types
of PW improvements, local
roads, pavement
rehabilitations, water,
sewer, storm drain, traffic
signals, striping, grading,
utilities.
Jeffrey Hirsh has approximately 25 years of experience in general engineering/public
works and building construction projects. He has worked in the capacity of foreman,
site superintendent and project manager. In these capacities, he has been involved
in a wide variety of private and public works construction projects in Type A (General
Engineering) and Type B (Building) construction. He has knowledge of standards and
procedures for public agencies, including the Green Book, Caltrans, and has extensive
experience in traffic control, safety and OSHA compliance requirements.
Mr. Hirsh also has experience in inspecting federally funded projects to ensure
compliance with the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. He also has
extensive experience in communicating/working with the public/adjacent property
owners, and being proactive in dealing with complaints and comments and
minimizing project impacts.
His Experience Includes:
• During his employment with Transtech, he has inspected projects that
included street, sidewalk, water, sewer, storm drain, park improvements.
• He also oversees traffic control and job site maintenance/NPDES/BMP
measures on construction site.
• He was the on-site inspector for a major water main installation project in
Commerce. Work was done during night time to avoid lane closures during
day time on the major arterial where work was performed. The second
phase of this project will involve extension of the new line thru Caltrans
ROW (710 Freeway).
• He also was the lead inspector for the Lugo Park Artificial Turf Soccer-Field
and Park Project in the City of Cudahy, which included reclaimed water
irrigation. The project was CDBG Federally Funded ($1.6m)
• He also served as one of the Sr. PW Inspectors on 3 major projects as part
of Transtech’s CM Team in the City of Commerce, where Transtech serves
as the City’s CIP Manager.
• The current on-going construction projects being managed by Transtech in
Commerce include:
o Washington Bl Widening and Reconstruction Project ($30m, Federally
Funded)
o City-Wide Annual Street Rehab Project ($3.2m)
o Slauson Avenue Tree and SW Replacement Project ($1.5m)
o Metrolink Station Improvements ($0.5m)
Jeffrey’s prior experience includes:
2013-214, PSBI Parking Structure Construction
• Sr. Superintendent Construction of a 6-level parking structure for the City
of Alhambra.
• All budgetary and supervisory site management responsibilities.
1995-2013, Harwood Homes, Inc.
• Vice President - Construction/Forward Planning Managed 35
Development Projects - SFR/Multi-Unit/Commercial
• Raw land development through onsite construction, includ ing final and
post occupancy. Supervised all aspects of planning, development and
construction processes.
• Responsible for construction of 2000+ single family homes.
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.13
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
• Responsible for construction of 850+ attached units.
• Successfully developed and completed multiple commercial project sites
including strip centers and a large, automated car wash facility.
• Supervised 20+ Construction Superintendents.
• Managed bidding processes, procedures and estimation, including
managing 5 Purchasing Managers/Agents.
• 20+ year track record of job site safety controls with zero significant job
site accidents, and zero Cal-OSHA violations.
• Compliance Management for all codes, conditions and ordinances.
• Implemented industry standard customer service system.
• Functioned as forward planning liaison to Civil Engineering Firms.
• Served on Project Evaluation/Selection Committee for 15 years.
1992-1995, Overland Company
• Site Superintendent – SFR Tract Home Development
1985-1992, Cambridge Development
• Customer Service Manager – Tract Home Development
• Site Superintendent/Assistant Superintendent
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.14
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
MARIO MAGLIOCCHETTI, Sr. Inspector
HIGHLIGHTS
• 30 years of experience in
general engineering/public
works and building
construction projects.
• Worked as PW inspector for
a number of agencies under
Transtech City Engineer
Contracts.
• Extensive experience in
NPDES.
• Inspected numerous
federally funded projects in
compliance with Local
Assistance Procedures
Manual, as well as projects
under Caltrans’ jurisdiction.
• Experience includes all types
of PW improvements, local
roads, pavement
rehabilitations, water,
sewer, storm drain, traffic
signals, striping, grading,
utilities.
Mr. Magliocchetti has approximately 30 years of experience in general engineering/public
works and building construction projects. He has worked in the capacity of foreman, site
superintendent and project manager. In these capacities, he has been responsible for more
than $500 million worth of private and public works construction projects in Type A and
Type B construction. He has knowledge of standards and procedures for many public
agencies, including the Green Book, and has extensive experience in tra ffic control, safety
and OSHA compliance requirements. He has participated on numerous multi -disciplinary
teams dealing with the architecture and engineering for urban and rural development,
infrastructure, and public works projects.
Mr. Magliocchetti also has experience in inspecting federally funded projects to ensure
compliance with the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. He also has extensive
experience in communicating/working with the public/adjacent property owners, and being
proactive in dealing with complaints and comments and minimizing project impacts. Some
of the major projects where Mr. Magliocchetti has served as Public Works Inspector are as
follows:
• City of San Bernardino, Contract Public Works Inspector: Provided inspections as
contract City Inspector for FY 2015/16 Street Rehab and Sidewalk ADA
Improvements ($4m construction).
• City of Temple City, Contract Public Works Inspector: Provided inspections as
contract City Inspector for various projects.
• City of Commerce, SR2S, Bus Shelter and Sidewalk and ADA Impr Project: The
project involved installation/reconstruction of Bus Shelters, sidewalks and ADA
Ramps under FTA Fed Funded Program. Construction Cost was $1.5m.
• City of La Habra Heights, Pavement Rehab Project: The project involved pavement
rehabilitation (overlay, slurry seal, R&R) on various streets. Construction cost was
$2m.
• City of Alhambra-Fremont Avenue and Valley Boulevard roadway, median and
landscape improvements: These projects involved construction of roadway,
raised median, striping, traffic signal loops, sidewalk, planters, landscape and
irrigation improvements. Total construction cost for both projects was $13m.
• City of Commerce-Tubeway Street Reconstruction: This project involved
construction of roadway, striping, traffic signal loops, and sidewalk improvements.
Construction cost was $1m.
• City of Hawthorne-Rosecrans, Hindrey, 405 Ramp: This project involved roadway
widening and reconstruction, traffic signals, utility undergrounding, water, sewer ,
electrical, raised median, sidewalk, planters, landscape and irrigation
improvements. The project was coordinated with Caltrans for improvements at
the 405/Hindery ramps. Coordination with local businesses has been imperative
to maintain a positive image for the City as construction took place in a very busy
commercial district. Construction cost was $3m.
• City of Alhambra-Polo Club Parking Lot: The project included extensive grading
and over excavation, demolition of existing buildings, underground el ectrical
system, pavement, planters, walls, landscaping, irrigation, lighting and various
concrete improvements. Construction cost was $1m.
• City of Alhambra Redevelopment Agency-Main Street Facade Project: The
project involved construction of seismic upgrade and new facade improvements
on a City block under the CDBG funding program. Construction cost was $4m.
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.15
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
OKAN DEMIRCI, MBA, EIT, Project Manager, Project Controls Support
EDUCATION
• MBA, Brandeis University,
Massachusetts
• BS, Engineering, Sabanci
University, Turkey
HIGHLIGHTS
• Serves as CIP Program
Manager and Assistant
Public Works Director and
Assistant City Engineer at
Transtech’s Contract Cities.
• Completed Caltrans
Resident Engineer Academy,
very familiar with the
management and
administration of federally
funded projects in
compliance with Caltrans
Local Assistance Procedures
Manual (LAPM).
• Strong knowledge of MS
Project, Primavera, AutoCAD
Mr. Demirci has approximately 9 years of experience. Mr. Demirci serves as Assistant
Public Works Director and Assistant City Engineer at Transtech’s Contract Cities and
provides technical and management support.
Mr. Demirci completed Caltrans Resident Engineer Academy, very familiar with the
management and administration of federally and state funded projects in compliance
with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM).
Mr. Demirci works as Project Manager on various projects (including federal and state
funded projects) from project inception to closeout.
Examples of his project experience includes:
• City of Monterey Park, Assistant to the Interim PW Director and CIP
Program Coordinator: Mr. Demirci serves as an assistant to the Interim PW
Director. As part of his responsibility, he coordinates Capital Improvement
Projects (CIP) program at the City. Mr. Demirci prepares PS&E packages for
various projects for Parks & Rec and Public Works Department. He also
provides project management to various projects from project inception to
project close out for the City. Highlighted projects are:
o Parks & Rec Master Plan Development and Construction of
Improvements at 13 parks (including picnic shelters, playgrounds,
irrigation systems installations and ADA improvements). Cost
$1.5m
o Citywide Parking Lot Reconstruction and Various City Facility
Restoration/Maintenance (including Cascades Waterfall
Restoration, City Pool Maintenance, Various other City facility
maintenance). Cost $2.5m
• City of Temple City, Assistant City Engineer (Transtech serves as Contract
City Engineer): Mr. Demirci serves as Assistant City Engineer. His main
responsibilities include managing City’s CIP program. Mr. Demirci prepares
PS&E packages for various City projects and manages CIP projects from
project inception to project closeout. Highlighted projects are:
o City’s Annual Pavement Management Program: Mr. Demirci
prepared and managed City’s PMP since 2013. He coordinated in
preparation of bid packages following recommendations from PMP
and managed projects in PE and CE phases. Annual cost: $1.5m
o Pedestrian and Bike Safety Improvements on Temple City Blvd, El
Monte and Various Locations Citywide (HSIP Federally Funded):
Mr. Demirci worked as project manager in PE and CE phases of
federally funded projects. These projects were managed in
compliance with applicable federal requirements. Cost: $1.5m
• City of Cudahy, Pedestrian Safety Improvements, (ATP): Served as Project
Manager for this $1.0m project. Project includes construction of pedestrian
safety improvements such as curb extensions, installation of traffic devices,
signs, striping.
• City of Cudahy, Lugo Park, Soccer Field Project (CDBG Federally Funded):
Served as Project Manager for this $1.6m project includes c onstruction of a
regulation new soccer field with artificial turf on existing baseball field, DG
walking path, landscaping, parking lot expansion, concrete plaza, lighting,
drainage, bathroom and concession stand ADA improvements. The project
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.16
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
is CDBG federally funded and being managed in compliance with applicable
CDBG requirements.
• City of Commerce, Slauson Avenue ADA Improvements and Tree
Replacement Project: Served as Project Manager for this $1.2m ADA
Improvements and tree replacement project.
• City of Commerce, 2016 City-wide Street Rehabilitation Project: Served as
Project Manager for this $4m street rehabilitation project.
• City of Temple City, Council Chambers Renovation and ADA Improvements
Project: Served as Project manager for the preparation of the plans,
specifications and cost estimates and bid package for the renovation and
ADA improvements of the Council Chambers Building. The improvements
included complete reconstruction/renovation of the Council Chambers with
new seating, dais, carpet, lighting, AV system, and new ADA compliant
bathrooms, new ADA compliant access to the building, new emergency
generator and electrical work, re-design of building creating a space for
Emergency Operations Center, asbestos removal, painting and other various
improvements. Cost approximately $0.5m.
• City of Temple City, CDBG ADA Improvements Project: Served as Assistant
Project manager for the preparation of the plans, specifications and cost
estimates and bid package as well as field reviews for ADA and sidewa lk
improvements at various locations thru out the City under CDBG funds. Cost
approximately $0.4m
Deputy Project Manager, Supporting/Backup Office Engineer for Rosemead
Safety and Enhancement and ADA Improvements Project: Served as one of the
Office Engineers for the Rosemead Safety and Enhancement Project. The project
included widening and reconstruction of 2 miles of Rosemead Boulevard,
including new medians, bike lanes, signals, sidewalks, curb&gutter, street lighting,
landscape, street scape. The project is federally funded and is managed in
compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Cost $20m.
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.17
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
AVANT-GARDE (DBE Firm); www.agi.com.co; CDBG Labor
Compliance Support
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.18
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.19
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.20
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.21
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
GEO-ADVANTEC, INC.; www.geoadvantec.com; Soils/Geotechnical, Materials Testing/Inspection
Support
Geo-Advantec, Inc. offers comprehensive services in various areas from site feasibility evaluation thought project
completion for a wide range of projects. Our highly-qualified team of professionals has extensive experiences in
performing variety of complex geotechnical engineering projects and providing innovative solutions for complex
projects. In addition, our diverse team of field technicians and inspectors with related technical backgrounds,
education, and accreditations are well experienced to support the construction course of projects. Geo-Advantec,
Inc. is vastly specialized to provide the following services:
• Geotechnical Engineering
• Engineering Geology
• Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering
• Geotechnical Instrumentation
• Pavement Engineering
• Forensic Geotechnical Engineering
• Grading Monitoring and Field Testing
• Soils & Materials Laboratory Testing
• Special Inspection Services
PROJECTS
City of Commerce, Washington Boulevard Rehabilitation (2015): Washington Boulevard is a major
east-west corridor that serves as one of the significant connectors between the I-710 and I-5 Freeways
carrying approximately 35,000 vehicles per day, 25% of which is truck traffic. This segment of roadway
is the key link in the regional movement of goods from the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach to the
terminals of the Union Pacific Railroad and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railways. The job was a
reconstruction and widening project covering a 2.7-mile segment of Washington Boulevard between
Indiana Street to the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway. The project was to improve truck circulation and current
level of service operations by reducing delays and traffic while improving the overall air quality. It would widen the mentioned
segment from two lanes to three lanes in each direction, which would allow for an increase in the turning radius and larger
medians for better traffic flow. Geo-Advantec was selected as the Caltrans certified laboratory and provided field
inspection/testing and laboratory testing in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Manual. Our team performed testing and
inspection on flexible and rigid pavements per the project/Caltrans requirements. We also measured the compressive and
flexural strengths of different types of concrete pavement components. The project duration was about 24 months and the
construction cost was approximately $30M.
City of Alhambra, 5-Story Parking Structure (2014 – 2015): Geo-Advantec provided soils
monitoring/observation, special inspection, and material testing for a 5.5-story Parking Structure at the
North 1 st Street of the City of Alhambra. The structural system of the proposed parking building
comprised of post-tension decking supported by reinforced concrete columns resting on spread and
strip footings. The perimeter concrete walls were constructed using shotcrete method.
City of Temple City, Rosemead Boulevard Safety Enhancement and Beautification (2012-2014): The
project consisted of streetscape enhancements on Rosemead Boulevard to improve safety and
aesthetics within the Temple City right-of- way. The proposed improvement was over approximately
2 miles of road, from the southern city limit with the City of Rosemead at the UPRR railroad bridge to
the Northern city limit with the County of Los Angeles at Callita Street. In general, the project
features included Removal and replacement of existing sidewalks, asphalt pavement, concrete
pavements, curb and gutters, curb ramps and existing short retaining walls, construction of localized
decorative pavements and crosswalks, removal and replacement of drains and installation of new
drain system, installation of new irrigation system lines, improvement of underground utilities, installation of traffic signals and
traffic signs, construction of bus shelter, median hardscape, and installation and improvement of street and pedestrian
lightning. The project was federally funded and performed under the Caltrans oversight. Geo-Advantec provided the resident
GEO-ADVANTEC; www.geoadvantec.com; Materials Testing and
Inspection Support
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.22
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
inspector of record services for the project. The duration of the project was about 16 months and the construction cost was
about $18M.
City of Santa Monica, Three-Story Parking Structure (2012): In 2012, Geo-Advantec conducted a
comprehensive geotechnical study for a proposed three-story parking structure to be constructed at 1543
Ocean Front Walk, Santa Monica, California. The site was along and within a close distance from the shore
line and our study on the site location concluded that the underlying soils strata at the site consisted of
materials susceptible to liquefaction. In addition, regional seismicity and presence of major active faults
was considered a signification hazard source in the site vicinity and required a thorough seismic hazard
study at the site. The investigation was completed in a short time and the final report included our
assessment of the site condition, post-liquefaction settlements at the site, and different mitigative
alternative for earthquake-induced settlement.
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), Trunk Line South, Unit 4, Phase 2 (2016): Geo-
Advantec, Inc. provided geotechnical instrumentation and monitoring for the City of Los Angeles Trunk
Line South, Unit 4, Phase 2. The project purpose was studying and monitoring the displacement of the
deep tunnel shafts’ walls and settlement of the underground tunnel due to construction of a new sewer
line. To monitor the movement and settlement during the construction, GAI installed four inclinometers,
each between 25 to 40 feet deep, and six vertical/deep extensometers of about 70 feet deep. The reports
of instrumentation readings were prepared and provided to the project team on a daily base.
City of Pomona, Storm Water Disposal at Gary Avenue (2015): The City intended to design and construct
an on-site storm-water disposal system. The system would collect and infiltrate Garey Avenue runoff into
the ground. Geo-Advantec scope of work included conducting several exploratory borings at the
designated locations, conducting SPT and sampling at 3 feet intervals for the substrata profile
determination, collecting disturbed/bulk samples of the encountered subsurface material, conducting
three percolation tests at a depth targeting the most permeable layer, performing laboratory testing on
the selected soils samples, reviewing the field data and the laboratory test results, performing engineering
analyses, and preparing a final geotechnical evaluation report that included results of our field and laboratory testing and
determined infiltration rates at the site. Our team completed the project in less than two weeks.
Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (METRO), Initial Site Assessment (ISA), Preliminary
Geotechnical Study, and Pavement Engineering Study for Lakewood and Alondra Intersections, City of
Bellflower, California (2015): The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro)
completed a Feasibility Study analyzing and identifying several “hot spots” along the SR-91, I-605, and I-
405 corridors. These “hot spots” are chronic traffic congestion areas and causing the flow of traffic
throughout the area to slow down to a stop. One of the improvements proposed by Metro and the
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in collaboration with the Gateway Cities Council of
Governments and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments for the I-605 Hot Spots was the Lakewood and Alondra
intersection. The intersection was among the “Top 40” intersections selected for initial improvement evaluation. Geo-Advantec
provided Initial Site Assessment (ISA) report and Pavement Engineering Study for the project. Geo-Advantec Inc. (GAI), provided
the Initial Site Assessment (ISA) for the project. The scope of the work included but was not limited to review of physiographic
information including regional geology and hydrogeology, review of topographic maps and aerial photographs, review of site
history and land use within the Site vicinity, review of federal, state, tribal, and local government agency records. Also, by
conducting several borings/coring through the pavement section, necessary data about the existing pavement section and
subgrade soils were collected, a preliminary geotechnical and pavement engineering report was prepared and the new
pavement section was designed.
Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), Geotechnical Grading, Monitoring and Testing for Qantas Hangar
(2015-2016): In January 2015, Geo-Advantec began working on a mass grading project in the LAX. The
project included grading operations for a large area located on the west end of the airport and included
grading for a large-span hangar for Qantas Airline, with a footprint of about 110,000 sf. The job included
raising the existing natural grade to the designated elevation by placing and compacting of up to 30 feet
earth materials. Geo-Advantec performed as the geotechnical engineer of record (GEOR) for the project and
provided qualified Deputy Grading Inspectors certified by both ICC and the City of Los Angeles to monitor
the grading work, and perform field density testing on a daily basis. Also, during the construction of Aprons and taxiways
carrying mega planes, we performed concrete inspection. The beam samples of concrete were casted and tested for flexural
strength in our laboratory.
City of Torrance, Torrance Transit Park and Ride Regional Terminal, Phase I-Rough Grading (2016): City of
Torrance intended to construct a Transit Park and Ride Regional Terminal to create a strategically located,
multi-modal facility that meet the regional needs of South Bay residents. The project was to improve
regional mobility by linking Torrance Transit routes with other regional providers in the Transit Terminal. The
Phase I of the job included rough grading of half of the existing fifteen-acre undeveloped site, located at 465
Crenshaw boulevard, which would be dedicated to the Transit Terminal. The City of Torrance retained Geo-
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.23
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Advantec for grading observation and soils testing of different components of the project including proposed one-story and two
story buildings, bus platform, canopies, and pavement of the designated areas. To complete the project, about 45,000 cubic
yards of soils were imported to the site. The purpose of testing and inspection operations was to verify that the completed
work complied with the project plans, specifications, special provisions, and geotechnical recommendations.
Centinela Valley Union High School District, Hawthorn and Lawndale High Schools Developments (2013-
2014): In 2013, Geo-Advantec conducted four separate geotechnical and geohazard investigations for the
Centinela Valley Union High School District at Hawthorne and Lawndale High Schools within the city of
Hawthorne, California.
The development in Hawthorne High School included a one to two-story amphitheater, a two-story classroom
building, and a drop off parking area and two parking lots. The proposed developments in Lawndale High
School consisted of the construction of a two-story student union service building along with the associated
site work in the building vicinity, a two-story classroom building and the repaving of the existing asphalt paved parking area on
the south and southeast side of the proposed building. Geo-Advantec conducted field exploratory works, and performed
laboratory tests on collected soil samples. After performing engineering analysis, we provided the District with final reports
which were approved by CGS (California Geologic Survey).
Fullerton Joint High School District, Seismic Rehabilitation of Historical Plummer Auditorium (2015): Geo-
Advantec team performed a comprehensive geotechnical evaluation to provide information for design and
construction of the project. The auditorium building was considered a historical site built circa 1930s’. Our field
geotechnical study included conducting 5 borings, as deep as 60 feet, as well as measuring Vs30 (shear wave
velocity for the upper 30 meters) at the field by using Spectral Analysis of Surface Wave (SASW) method. GAI
team performed laboratory tests on selected samples as well as engineering analysis. And provided all the soils
parameters complying with the methods outlined in ASCE 41-13. To evaluate the seismic hazard at the site, we conducted site-
specific study (probabilistic and deterministic hazard analysis) and provide the structural team with the site-specific spectra.
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.24
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.25
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
B. PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS B.26
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
C. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
C. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY C.1
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
GENERAL APPROACH
We have a structured approach to execute projects in an efficient manner that makes Transtech capable
of providing the client with high quality product. Transtech has established guidelines and policies,
including written manuals on quality control, project management, and design procedures for its staff.
These guidelines ensure a consistent approach to the execution of assignments undertaken by our
organization. The following paragraphs describe our general approach to deliver projects in an efficient
and cost-effective manner. A project specific approach will be provided for each assigned project, and
will become part of the specific contract for the specific project.
• Project Management: Our approach is to provide proactive management and attempt to identify
potential issues and problems in advance and take corrective actions before they become problems.
This requires extensive hands-on knowledge, experience and management skills of the people
involved in managing and inspecting the project. Our team members have extensive experience and
proven track record in managing large and complex projects and bringing them to a completion on
time and within budget.
• Approach to Cost Control and Change Orders: We evaluate project costs and develop feasible
mitigation measures to minimize additional costs. We work as a team to solve problems or make
modifications in the field to address unforeseen conditions or owner generated changes in a cost
effective manner.
• Approach to Scheduling and Timely Completion of Project and Schedule Recovery: The baseline
schedule should properly identify the project scope, critical path, project milestones, target dates,
phases and sequences of work, and activity durations. When significant activities show that they are
slipping from the baseline, we work with the contractor to develop recovery plans.
• Management of Documents: We use an electronic file management system. All construction forms,
daily dairies, weekly statement of working days, etc. are stored in our electronic file system, and are
per Caltrans documentation system. We provide these documents at the end of the project to the
client in organized files as well as pdf files.
• Safety and Security: We hold meetings with the contractor to review and discuss safety and security
requirements, OSHA conformance, emergency security and safety procedures, and enforce security
and safety responsibilities.
• Funding Closeout: We prepare necessary closeout documentation required by the funding agencies,
submit final reimbursement documentation, follow-up on the reimbursements, and final funds
balance report.
• Project Closeout: We recognize that closeout is an important part of the construction process. It
signifies that the new facility structure is ready to use. We methodically handle all closeout tasks to
ensure a smooth transition from construction to occupancy.
• Methodology for Communication to Inform City on Work Progress: Key project team members will
attend periodic project progress meetings with City staff throughout the project duration.
• Electronic common project information and file sharing platform: We create and provide access to
project participates a common project information and file sharing platform.
C. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY C.2
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Contract Administration:
For contract administration, we follow guidelines described in Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures
Manual (LAPM). Chapter 16 of LAPM covers the topics beginning with project supervision, contract time,
subcontractors, Engineer’s daily reports, projects files, construction records and procedures, safety
provisions, labor compliance, equal opportunity employment, disadvantaged business enterprise,
contract change orders, material sampling and testing, and traffic safety in the highway and street zones.
Maintaining complete and accurate files is a very important aspect of managing federally funded projects.
Generally, whenever the local agency is unable to produce requested data or information, it is assumed
by reviewing personnel that the required actions were either never performed or not properly recorded.
Organized project files can minimize these negative assumptions. Organization and content of the project
file is one indicator of effective and efficient management of the project by the resident engineer.
Sample Construction Management Forms - Sample Asst. Resident Engineer Daily Report
C. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY C.3
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Sample Construction Management Forms:
Sample Asst. Resident Engineer Daily Report (cont’d)
Sample Construction Management Forms:
Sample Resident Engineer Daily Report
C. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY C.4
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Sample Public Outreach:
When requested, we can also provide an effective public outreach, including setting up a construction
information web site, toll free project call number, project e-mail, hold community information meetings,
provide public information via e-mails on web sites. We currently have several project specific web sites
for various projects under construction. A sample view of one of our construction web-sites is provided
(visit http://www.washingtonblvdcommerce.com/)
• Website is updated frequently with construction updates, field pictures.
• Approximately 3,600 users viewed the website for a total of 5,189 times to receive project updates.
• On average, the project website was visited over 190 times a month.
C. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY C.5
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
SCOPE OF WORK
Following is the scope of work listed in City’s RFP:
Service Function Deliverables
Pre-construction
Conference
Outline project specifics. Inform contractor of project
administration procedures.
Agenda meeting minutes
Management Information
System (MIS)
Implement system for organizing, tracking, filing, and
managing paper/electronic correspondence including
letters, information requests, submittals, contracts,
reports, O&M manuals, progress payments, and change
orders, etc
Paper files, digital files,
correspondence logs.
Review Traffic Controls
Plans
Review contractor’s plans for detours, shutdowns and
access for emergency vehicles.
Review traffic control plan
Meetings Conduct meetings to discuss, background, scope,
objectives, schedule, current, and past issues as
necessary.
Agenda meeting minutes
Issues Management Analyze issues, seek appropriate advice, and give
recommendations. Review cost reduction proposals as
well as contractor’s methods of construction in order to
ensure compliance with plans and specifications and
delivery of project within budget and the time
specified.
Design clarifications. Contract
change orders.
Schedule Monitor contractor’s schedule weekly. Notify parties of
actual or potential deviation from schedule. Work with
project team to correct noncompliance with schedule.
Schedule reports and
recommendations of “As-built”
schedule
Cost Control Monitor project funding. Monitor project budgets.
Review contract item payments, material quantities,
and change order payments.
Budget reports and cost
estimate reviews
Labor Compliance and
any other services that
are necessary to ensure
full compliance with
CDBG, federal, State and
county requirements
Provide labor compliance report (s). Attend, present,
and prepare meeting minutes for pre-construction
conferences associated to CDBG requirements to
contractors. Review and approve CDBG-related
submittals. Prepare and assist the City with
submission of any reporting documents required by
federal, state and county agencies. Verify and
document job-site posting of wage rate information
and required labor compliance poster. Perform
employee interviews on site as necessary for
compliance. Review and approve weekly certified
payroll and associated documents, and work with
contractor to correct deficiencies in a timely manner.
Keep a complete labor compliance file and provide to
the City upon project completion.
Provide labor compliance report (s)
to include reporting on prevailing
wage, payroll documentation,
compliance status, and certified
payrolls.
C. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY C.6
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Change Orders Review potential change orders for contractual and
technical merit.
Prepare independent cost estimate and schedule
analysis of work.
Negotiate and prepare change orders for execution.
Keep the City apprised of impact of cumulative change
orders.
Independent review of cost
estimate for change orders.
Ready for execution of change
order summary reports.
Dispute Resolution Make recommendations and implement procedures for
reducing the likelihood of disputes and claims. Assist in
the resolution of disputes.
Dispute avoidance procedures
and give recommendations
Quality
Control/Inspection
Observe and monitor all aspects of project. Notify
contractor when work is not in compliance. Prepare
daily inspection reports. Provide photographic and video
documentation of construction process. Encourage and
stress quality in the constructed product. Provide
materials testing services.
Photograph and videotapes
project files
Public Relations Communicate with local business community regarding
temporary construction impacts, such as traffic changes,
noise, limited access and construction schedule.
Verbal and written notices
delivered to local businesses
Permit/Environmental
Compliance
Review and enforce requirements stipulated in permits
issued by regulatory and environmental agencies.
Daily inspection reports and
correspondence
Progress Payments Review and approve all contractor’s payment request.
Verify contractor pay items. Prepare payment
documentation for execution.
Progress payment request
documents
Monthly Status Reports Prepare monthly reports highlighting project progress,
CCO’s, cost issues, and schedule.
Monthly report
Site Safety Review and monitor contractor’s safety program for
compliance with Cal/OSHA. Notify contractor if unsafe
condition is observed. Notify City if contractor refuses to
rectify unsafe condition. Investigate accidents.
Accident reports and monthly
reports.
“As-Built” Drawings Collect, review, and transmit contractor’s data to
engineer.
Review data for accuracy for
record drawings.
Final Walkthrough Make final inspections, Prepare punch-list. Verify that
required certificates of compliance, O&M manuals and
as-built drawings have been delivered.
Punch list
Project Completion
Report
Process final progress payment to contractor. File Notice
of Completion. Prepare final report. Review project
records
Final progress payment, Notice of
Completion and Final report.
Deliver project records to the City
D. PROJECT SCHEDULE
D. PROJECT SCHEDULE D.1
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
City’s RFP indicates the construction duration for this project is 30 working days.
This is a requirement of bid specifications that the construction contractor is required to complete the
construction of the project.
The construction contractor is required to prepare and submit a baseline schedule, which identifies the
construction tasks, critical path, milestones, task duration and completion dates, work sequence and
activity durations.
The construction schedule is part of contractor’s means and methods, and as such he/she is responsible
for the delivery of the project based on the approved schedule.
As Construction Manager, we monitor the schedule, and request the contractor to submit updates as
necessary. We also request the contractor submit look-ahead schedules and other night-time, weekend
or hour-by-hour schedules, if needed.
When significant activities show that they are slipping from the baseline, we work with the contractor to
develop recovery plans.
In developing schedules all resources are used including but not limited to everything from checklists,
spread sheets, bar charts, graphic schedules, linear scheduling techniques and of course the Critical Path
Method.
Both Microsoft Project and P6 are commonly used as the primary software in the development of CPM
schedules. The schedule is a living and constantly evolving entity.
On larger and complex projects, “fully loaded” schedules on Primavera can be used. However, smaller
contractors may not have the sophistication, capability and resources of using Primavera. Also, if
Primavera is used, the City would be required to have necessary license as well to be able to open and
evaluate Primavera files. It is likely that the majority of the contractors will provide schedules in MS
Schedule Format.
Following are samples of project schedules that we use.
D. PROJECT SCHEDULE D.2
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Sample 1-Primavera Schedule: This schedule was prepared for the Washington Boulevard Widening and
Reconstruction Project in the City of Commerce. The project is federally funded with a total project budget
was $38M. The project was competed in multiple phases and in a segmented approach to minimize the
impacts of construction on public traffic and adjacent properties.
Sample 2-MS Project Schedule: This schedule was prepared for Garfield Avenue reconstruction with FDR,
and 5 other streets for cold-mill and overlay rehabilitation with a total project budget was $5M.
D. PROJECT SCHEDULE D.3
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Sample 3-Week Look-Ahead Schedule
Sample Hour by Hour Schedule for night-time and weekend Work
E. DBE USE
E. DBE USE E.1
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
DBE SUBCONSULTANT (CDBG Labor Compliance)
For this project, Transtech Team includes the following expert consulting firms for Materials Testing and
Inspection:
• AVANT-GARDE (DBE Firm); www.agi.com.co; CDBG Labor Compliance.
F. CONTRACT
F. CONTRACT F.1
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
If selected by the City, we request for the City Attorney and our legal representative to work together on
the following items for a mutually agreed upon language.
F. CONTRACT F.2
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
A ten (10) day written notice to CITY shall apply to non-payment of
premium. CONSULTANT shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to
CITY prior to implementation of a reduction of limits or material change of
insurance coverage as specified herein.
F. CONTRACT F.3
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
as part of prevailing party’s total damages attributable to
the non-prevailing party’s proportionate percentage of fault
as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction
FEE
UPDATED FEE PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687; CDBG No. 601869-17)
Following is our estimated fee breakdown:
Hrs
Hrly
Billing
Rate Total Fee Hrs
Hrly
Billing
Rate Total Fee Hrs
Hrly
Billing
Rate Total Fee
4 $175 $700 4 $115 $460 4 $100 $400 12 $1,560
Construction Phase-Field
Construction
NOTE: Per RFP, Field
Construction Duration is
specfied as 80 working days.
Our fee is based on this
duration.
30 work
days 30 $175 $5,250 180 $115 $20,700 30 $100 $3,000 240 $28,950
5 $175 $875 5 $115 $575 5 $100 $500 15 $1,950
39 $6,825 189 $21,735 39 $3,900 267 $32,460
12.36%$5,000
7.41%$3,000
$40,460
NOTE: The inspection hours during Construction Phase is assumed to be 6 hours average per day for 30 working days. This is based on
the assumption that there may be some working days, which full day inspection (8 hours) may not be required such as
mobilization/demobilitization, striping, etc.
NOTE: The above fees are based on 30 working day construction duration. If the construction duration extends beyond 30 working days, or
City desires longer than 8 hr daily construction work hours, or night work, or weekend work, such additional effort would be billed based
on actual additional hours and applicable billing rates.
Total Fee
Totals
FEE PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION
SERVICES (RFP 18-09, CIP #17-687;
CDBG No. 601869-17)
CM, Sr. Eng, PM Hours Inspection Hours Office Engineer Hours
Tot Hrs
Pre-construction Phase
Project Close-out
PLUS ESTIMATED BUDGET FOR: GEO-ADVANTEC, INC.: Sub Consultant (Materials Testing and Inspection);
www.geoadvantec.com
PLUS ESTIMATED BUDGET FOR: AVANT-GARDE (DBE Firm); www.agi.com.co; CDBG Labor Compliance
FEE
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0184
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR CIP 17-687
AND CIP 18-691, ADA IMPROVEMENTS ON PROSPECT AVENUE
(Acting Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1.Award a construction contract for CIP17-687 and CIP 18-691 for ADA Improvements on
Prospect Avenue in the amount of $141,900.00;
2.Adopt the attached resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hermosa
Beach Approving the Construction of CIP 17-687 and CIP 18-691 ADA Improvements on
Prospect Avenue;
3.Authorize the Mayor to execute the construction contract and the City Clerk to attest, subject
to approval by the City Attorney;
4.Authorize the Acting Director of Public Works to establish a 25% project contingency for a total
construction budget of $177,375; and
5.Authorize the Acting Director of Public Works to file a Notice of Completion following final
completion of the project.
Executive Summary:
The Public Works Department has been working on a Capital Improvements Program Project that
would utilize Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)funding provided to the City by the
County of Los Angeles to update the curb ramps on Prospect Avenue between 6th Street to Hollowell
Avenue to increase accessibility and mobility along this arterial corridor in East Hermosa Beach.
Based on the six bids received,staff recommends City Council award a construction contract to the
lowest responsible bidder,K.C.Equipment,Inc.(K.C.)in the amount of $141,900.00 for the curb
ramp improvement project on Prospect Avenue from 6th Street to Hollowell Avenue.
Background:
On January 10,2017,City Council adopted a resolution allocating County CDBG funds from the Los
Angeles Community Development Commission (LACDC)for a project that includes the construction
of ADA curb ramps on Prospect Avenue for the fiscal year of 2017 (CIP 17-687).Similarly on January
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0184
of ADA curb ramps on Prospect Avenue for the fiscal year of 2017 (CIP 17-687).Similarly on January
23,2018,City Council adopted a resolution allocating CDBG funds from the LACDC for a project that
includes the construction of ADA curb ramps on Prospect Avenue for the fiscal year 2018 (CIP 18-
691).
Based on the recommendations from the City’s Traffic Engineer and grant implementation
restrictions,staff determined that the best location to utilize the CDBG funds on Prospect Avenue
would be between 6th Street and Hollowell Avenue.Subsequently,Public Works Staff proceeded with
the design and preparation of construction documents.
Staff obtained authorization from LACDC to advertise a single bid for the construction of both projects
concurrently due to the similarity and proximity of the project and to obtain a more competitive bid.
Analysis:
On March 14th, 2019, six (6) bids were received and opened. The low bidder was K.C. with a
construction cost of $141,900.00. The bid results are summarized below.
Bidder
Bid A mount
K.C. Equipment, Inc.
$141,900.00
FS Con tractors, Inc.
$158,400.00
Gentry General Engineering
$168,283.00
Concept Consultant
$168,956.08
Hardy & Harper
$210,000.00
EBS General Engineering, Inc.
$221,600.00
Staff reviewed the low bid and found the company to be a responsible and responsive bidder.
Furthermore,staff confirmed that the low bidder contractor’s license is active and in good standing
with the Contractor’s State License Board,and the references provided by the lowest bidder
confirmed that K.C.successfully completed and demonstrated competency through projects similar in
magnitude and character over the last five (5) years.
Construction for this project is anticipated to begin in early April and would take approximately 25
working days to complete the construction.
General Plan Consistency:
This report and associated recommendations have been evaluated for their consistency with the
City’s General Plan. Relevant policies are listed below:
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0184
3.3.2 Complete Pedestrian Network.Prioritize investment in designated priority sidewalks to ensure a
complete network of sidewalks and pedestrian-friendly amenities that enhances pedestrian safety,
access opportunities and connectivity to destinations.
7.2.4.Sidewalk Improvements.Consider innovative funding strategies,such as cost-sharing,ADA
accessibility grants,or sidewalk dedications,to improve the overall condition,safety,and accessibility
of sidewalks.
Fiscal Impact:
The projects’expenses are reimbursable through CDBG funds.The City has allocated funds in the
following accounts for each project to cover the labor,compliance support,the construction
management, the inspection and the construction expenses:
CIP Number
Account #
Amount
CIP 17-687
140-8687-4201
$150,000
CIP 18-691
140-8691-4201
$120,000
Total Funding
$270,000
The construction cost by K.C.for $177,375,including 25%construction contingency,would be
proportionally charged to both project accounts.Additionally,$50,575 of the CDBG funds would be
utilized for the contract for construction management, inspection and labor compliance for the project.
Attachments:
1.Bid Opening
2.Draft Agreement
3.Draft Resolution
Respectfully Submitted by: Fabio M. Macias, E.I.T., Assistant Engineer
Concur: Lucho Rodriguez, P.E., Acting Director of Public Works
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director
Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
Page 1 of 8
This Construction Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the date
executed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk, by and between K.C. Equipment, Inc.
(hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR") and the City of Hermosa Beach, California, a
municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY").
R E C I T A L S
A. Pursuant to the Notice Inviting Sealed Bids for CIP Project No. 17-687 and 18-691 ADA
Improvements on Prospect Avenue, bids were received, publicly opened, and declared on the
date specified in the notice; and
B. On March 26, 2019, City’s City Council declared CONTRACTOR to be the lowest
responsible bidder and accepted the bid of CONTRACTOR; and
C. The City Council has authorized the Mayor to execute a written contract with
CONTRACTOR for furnishing labor, equipment and material for the CIP Project No. 17-687
and 18-691 ADA Improvements on Prospect Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants herein
contained, it is agreed:
1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: CITY agrees to engage CONTRACTOR and
CONTRACTOR agrees to furnish all necessary labor, tools, materials, appliances, and
equipment for and do the work for the CIP Project No. 17-687 and 18-691 ADA
Improvements on Prospect Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach. The work shall be
performed in accordance with the Plans and Specifications dated February, 2018, (the
“Specifications”) on file in the office of the City Clerk and in accordance with bid prices
set forth in CONTRACTOR’S Bid Proposal and in accordance with the instructions of
the City Engineer.
2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLEMENTARY: The
contract documents for the aforesaid project shall consist of the Notice Inviting Bids,
Instructions to Bidders, Bid Proposal, Builders General Provisions, Standard
Specifications, Special Provisions, Exhibit A and Exhibit B, and all referenced
specifications, details, standard drawings, and appendices; together with this Agreement
and all required bonds, insurance certificates, permits, notices and affidavits; and also,
including any and all addenda or supplemental agreements clarifying, amending, or
extending the work contemplated as may be required to insure its completion in an
acceptable manner. All of the provisions of said contract documents are made a part
hereof as though fully set forth herein. This contract is intended to require a complete
and finished piece of work and anything necessary to complete the work properly and in
accordance with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by
CONTRACTOR whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should it be
ascertained that any inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents and this
written agreement, the provisions of this Agreement, the Builders General Provisions and
the Standard Specifications, in that order, shall control. Collectively, these contract
documents constitute the complete agreement between CITY and CONTRACTOR and
supersede any previous agreements or understandings.
3. COMPENSATION: CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in
its Bid Proposal as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work,
and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses,
losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the work during its
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
Page 2 of 8
progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the
work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the aforesaid contract
documents; and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen
difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension or
discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risks of any description connected
with the work.
4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE: CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work within 45
calendar days from the date of the notice to proceed. By signing this Agreement,
CONTRACTOR represents to CITY that the contract time is reasonable for completion
of the work and that CONTRACTOR will complete such work within the contract time.
5. PREVAILING WAGES.
A. Pursuant to Labor Code § 1720, and as specified in 8 California Code of
Regulations § 16000, CONTRACTOR must pay its workers prevailing wages. It
is CONTRACTOR’s responsibility to interpret and implement any prevailing
wage requirements and CONTRACTOR agrees to pay any penalty or civil
damages resulting from a violation of the prevailing wage laws.
B. In accordance with Labor Code § 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem
wages are available upon request from CITY’s Engineering Division or the
website for State of California Prevailing wage determination at
http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/PWD. CONTRACTOR must post a copy of the
prevailing rate of per diem wages at the job site.
C. CITY directs CONTRACTOR’s attention to Labor Code §§ 1777.5, 1777.6 and
3098 concerning the employment of apprentices by CONTRACTOR or any
subcontractor.
D. Labor Code § 1777.5 requires CONTRACTOR or subcontractor employing
tradesmen in any apprenticeship occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship
committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the
apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate
must also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the
performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases
will not be less than one to five except:
i. When employment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days before the
request for certificate, or
ii. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of
one to five, or
iii. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its
membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis state-wide
or locally, or
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
Page 3 of 8
iv. When CONTRACTOR provides evidence that CONTRACTOR employs
registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not
less than one apprentice to eight journeymen.
v. CONTRACTOR is required to make contributions to funds established for
the administration of apprenticeship programs if CONTRACTOR employs
registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such
contracts and if other contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
vi. CONTRACTOR and any subcontractor must comply with Labor Code §§
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
vii. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules and other
requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations,
ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California,
or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
E. CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors must keep an accurate certified payroll
records showing the name, occupation, and the actual per diem wages paid to
each worker employed in connection with this Agreement. The record will be
kept open at all reasonable hours to the inspection of the body awarding the
contract and to the Division of Labor Law Enforcement. If requested by CITY,
CONTRACTOR must provide copies of the records at its cost.
6. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work
for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and CONTRACTOR and any
subcontractor under it shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of
California having to do with working hours set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1,
Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
CONTRACTOR shall forfeit, as a penalty to City, twenty-five dollars ($25.00)
for each laborer, workman or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him
or any subcontractor under it, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each
calendar day during which the laborer, worker or mechanic is required or permitted to
labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of the Labor Code.
7. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: CONTRACTOR agrees to pay travel and
subsistence pay to each worker needed to execute the work required by this Agreement as
such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining
agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8.
8. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The City of Hermosa Beach and its officers, agents and
employees ("Indemnitees") shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any
loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of the
materials or other things used or employed in performing the work; or for injury or
damage to any person or persons, either workers or employees of CONTRACTOR, of its
subcontractors or the public, or for damage to adjoining or other property from any cause
whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
Page 4 of 8
CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any damage or injury to any person or property
resulting from defects or obstructions or from any cause whatsoever.
CONTRACTOR will indemnify Indemnities against and will hold and save
Indemnitees harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property,
penalties, obligations or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm,
entity, corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in
connection with the work, operation, or activities of CONTRACTOR, its agents,
employees, subcontractors or invitees provided for herein, whether or not there is
concurrent passive negligence on the part of City. In connection therewith:
a. CONTRACTOR will defend any action or actions filed in connection with
any such claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities and will pay
all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees, expert fees and costs
incurred in connection therewith.
b. CONTRACTOR will promptly pay any judgment rendered against
CONTRACTOR or Indemnitees covering such claims, damages, penalties,
obligations and liabilities arising out of or in connection with such work,
operations or activities of CONTRACTOR hereunder, and
CONTRACTOR agrees to save and hold the Indemnitees harmless
therefrom.
c. In the event Indemnitees are made a party to any action or proceeding
filed or prosecuted against CONTRACTOR for damages or other claims
arising out of or in connection with the work, operation or activities
hereunder, CONTRACTOR agrees to pay to Indemnitees and any all costs
and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in such action or proceeding
together with reasonable attorneys' fees.
Contractor's obligations under this section apply regardless of whether or not such
claim, charge, damage, demand, action, proceeding, loss, stop notice, cost, expense,
judgment, civil fine or penalty, or liability was caused in part or contributed to by an
Indemnitee. However, without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this
agreement, Contractor shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City for
liability attributable to the active negligence of City, provided such active negligence is
determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent
jurisdiction. In instances where City is shown to have been actively negligent and where
City active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the
obligation of Contractor will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not
attributable to the active negligence of City.
So much of the money due to CONTRACTOR under and by virtue of the contract
as shall be considered necessary by City may be retained by City until disposition has
been made of such actions or claims for damages as aforesaid.
It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to
be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California. This
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
Page 5 of 8
indemnity provision shall survive the termination of the Agreement and is in addition to
any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law.
This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of
any insurance coverage which may have been required under this Agreement or any
additional insured endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees.
CONTRACTOR, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it,
hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Indemnitees, while
acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising our of
or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR
regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent passive negligence by the Indemnitees.
9. THIRD PARTY CLAIMS. In accordance with Public Contracts Code § 9201, CITY will
promptly inform CONTRACTOR regarding third-party claims against CONTRACTOR,
but in no event later than ten (10) business days after CITY receives such claims. Such
notification will be in writing and forwarded in accordance with the “Notice” section of
this Agreement. As more specifically detailed in the contract documents,
CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify and defend the City against any third-party claim.
10. WORKERS COMPENSATION: In accordance with California Labor Code Sections
1860 and 3700, CONTRACTOR and each of its subcontractors will be required to secure
the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of
California Labor Code Section 1861, CONTRACTOR, by signing this contract, certifies
as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which
require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to
undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will
comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this
contract.
11. INSURANCE: With respect to performance of work under this contract,
CONTRACTOR shall maintain and shall require all of its subcontractors to maintain
insurance as required in the Builders General Provisions.
12. ASSIGNMENT: This contract is not assignable nor the performance of either party's
duties delegable without the prior written consent of the other party. Any attempted or
purported assignment or delegation of any of the rights of obligations of either party
without the prior written consent of the other shall be void and of no force and effect.
13. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: CONTRACTOR is and shall at all times remain as
to the CITY, a wholly independent contractor. Neither the CITY nor any of its agents
shall have control of the conduct of CONTRACTOR or any of CONTRACTOR'S
employees, except as herein set forth. CONTRACTOR shall not at any time or in any
manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or
employees of CITY.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
Page 6 of 8
14. TAXES: CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying all retail sales and use,
transportation, export, import, special or other taxes and duties applicable to, and
assessable against any work, materials, equipment, services, processes and operations
incidental to or involved in this contract. CONTRACTOR is responsible for ascertaining
and arranging to pay them. The prices established in the contract shall include
compensation for any taxes CONTRACTOR is required to pay by laws and regulations in
effect at the bid opening date.
15. LICENSES: CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to CITY that it has all licenses,
permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally
required of CONTRACTOR to practice its profession. CONTRACTOR represents and
warrants to CITY that CONTRACTOR shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect
or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, insurance,
and approvals which are legally required of CONTRACTOR to practice its profession.
CONTRACTOR shall maintain a City of Hermosa Beach business license, if required
under CITY ordinance.
16. RECORDS: CONTRACTOR shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel,
property, and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining
to this Agreement and such other records as may be deemed necessary by CITY or any
authorized representative, and will be retained for three years after the expiration of this
Agreement. All such records shall be made available for inspection or audit by CITY at
any time during regular business hours.
17. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of these contract documents are declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed
modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion
enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will
continue in full force and effect.
18. WHOLE AGREEMENT: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements
either oral or written, between the parties and contains all of the covenants and
agreements between the parties pertaining to the work of improvements described herein.
Each party to this contract acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises
or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on
behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that any other agreement,
statements or promise not contained in this contract shall not be valid or binding. Any
modifications of this contract will be effective only if signed by the party to be charged.
17. AUTHORITY: CONTRACTOR affirms that the signatures, titles, and seals set forth
hereinafter in execution of this Agreement represent all individuals, firm members,
partners, joint ventures, and/or corporate officers having a principal interest herein. Each
party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power,
right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. This
Agreement may be modified by written amendment. CITY’s city manager may execute any
such amendment on CITY’s behalf.
18. NOTICES: All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be in writing,
and shall be deemed made when delivered to the applicable party’s representative as
provided in this Agreement. Additionally, such notices may be given to the respective
parties at the following addresses, or at such other addresses as the parties may provide in
writing for this purpose.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
Page 7 of 8
Such notices shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed forty-eight
(48) hours after deposit in the U.S. mail, first-class postage prepaid, and addressed to the
party at its applicable address.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Attention: ________________________ Project Supervisor
CONTRACTOR:
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
Attention: __________________________________
19 DISPUTES. Disputes arising from this contract will be determined in accordance with
the contract documents.
20 NON-DISCRIMINATION: No discrimination shall be made in the employment of
persons in the work contemplated by this Agreement because of race, religion, color,
medical condition, sex, sexual orientation and/or gender identity, national origin, political
affiliation or opinion, or pregnancy or pregnancy-related condition. A violation of this
section exposes CONTRACTOR to the penalties provided for in Labor Code Section
1735.
21 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY. This Contract and every provision herein is for the
exclusive benefit of the Contractor and the City and not for the benefit of any other party.
There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of the Contractor’s or the City’s
obligations under this Contract.
22 TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of the
Contract Documents.
23 ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Contract,
agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into in
connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is
delivered by facsimile transmission. Such facsimile signature will be treated in all
respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
24 GOVERNING LAW: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this Contract will be in Los
Angeles County.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement with all the
formalities required by law on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
Page 8 of 8
State of California
CONTRACTOR'S License No. __
CONTRACTOR
_________________ By: ____________________________________________
Date TITLE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
_________________ By: ____________________________________________
Date MAYOR
ATTEST:
By: ____________________________________________
Date CITY CLERK
CONTRACTOR'S Business Phone
Emergency Phone at which CONTRACTOR can be reached at any time: ( )
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
__________________
Date
-1-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
RESOLUTION NO. 2019-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION OF CIP NO. 17-687 AND CIP NO. 18-691
ADA IMPROVEMENTS ON PROSPECT AVENUE PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 830.6 AND ESTABLISHING A PROJECT
PAYMENT ACCOUNT;
The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does resolve as follows:
The City Council finds and declares as follows:
The City Engineer designed and prepared the plans for construct CIP No.
17-687 and 18-691 ADA Improvements on Prospect Avenue
(“Project”);
The City Engineer finds that the plans are complete and the Project may be
constructed; and
The City Council wishes to obtain the immunities set forth in Government
Code § 830.6 with regard to the plans and construction of the
Project.
Design Immunity; Authorization.
The design and plans for the Project are determined to be consistent with
the City’s standards and are approved;
The design approval set forth in this Resolution occurred before actual work
on the Project construction commenced;
The approval granted by this Resolution conforms with the City’s General
Plan;
The City Engineer, or designee, is authorized to act on the City’s behalf in
approving any alterations or modifications of the design and plans
approved by this Resolution; and
The approval and authorization granted by this Resolution is intended to
avail the City of the immunities set forth in Government Code §
830.6.
Project Payment Account;
For purposes of the Contract Documents administering the Project, the City
establishes an account containing sufficient monies from the current
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
and following fiscal year budget to pay for the Project. This Account
is the sole source of funds available for the Contract Sum, as defined
in the Contract Document administering the Project.
The City Clerk is directed to certify the adoption of this Resolution.
This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.
Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the City of Hermosa Beach City Council hereby
adopts Resolution No. 2019-XX on March 26th, 2019.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26th day of March, 2019.
_________________________________________________________________
MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________ __________________________
City Clerk City Attorney
I, Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2019- was duly and regularly passed
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at its
adjourned regular meeting held on the 26th day of March, 2019, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0197
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
BROWN ACT COMPLAINT FILED BY ANTHONY HIGGINS
(City Attorney Mike Jenkins)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1.Receive and file this report; and
2.Direct the City Attorney to send a letter (Attachment 2) pursuant to Government Code
§54960.1 (c)(2) communicating the City Council’s determination that no Brown Act violation
occurred and therefore that the City Council will not cure or correct the challenged actions.
Background:
Anthony Higgins delivered a “Brown Act Cure and Correct Demand Letter”(“Complaint”)to the City
on February 25,2019 alleging violations of the Brown Act.The Brown Act provides that any person
may challenge an action taken by the City Council by filing a written demand to cure or correct the
action alleged to have been taken in violation of the Brown Act.The demand must clearly describe
the challenged action of the City Council and the nature of the alleged violation.This report will
address the substantive allegations contained in the Complaint.
The City takes every Brown Act allegation seriously,even when it would appear on its face to be
without merit.The Brown Act dictates that the City Council determine,within 30 days of receipt of
demand,whether it will cure or correct the challenged action.If the City Council does not act within
30 days,it is deemed to have determined not to take any corrective action.Tonight’s meeting is within
the 30-day period for response.Pursuant to Government Code §54960.1(b),the Council must
determine whether a violation occurred and if so, whether to cure the violation.
A copy of the Complaint is attached as “Attachment 1.” It alleges three violations of the Brown Act:
1.The Council denied Mr.Higgins the right to publicly comment on the City Manager’s Report
regarding the Hermosa Avenue and Strand Improvement Project.
2.The Council has imposed administrative procedures that have the effect of limiting the right of
the public to speak on only one agenda item.
3.The Council has denied the public’s right to ask questions to the Council on agenda items,and
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0197
3.The Council has denied the public’s right to ask questions to the Council on agenda items,and
the City Clerk should inform the public of its right to ask questions to Councilmembers.
Analysis:
Complaint #1:
In “Item 1”of Mr.Higgins’letter,he claims that he was not given the opportunity to speak before or
during the presentation of the City Manager’s Report.He further claims that an email he sent to the
Council was not addressed.He demands that “members of the public be consistently given an
opportunity to speak to any and all city council agenda items for at least 2 minutes per agenda item.”
The Council’s policy and practice is to allow public comment on each agenda item as it comes up,
with the exception of comments on “Miscellaneous Items and Meeting Attendance Reports -City
Council”and “Other Matters -City Council,”as to which public comments must be made under Oral
Communications.This policy is stated expressly on the agenda.Hence,the City’s policy and practice
is entirely consistent with Government Code section 54954.3,which requires in relevant part that “[e]
very agenda for regular meetings shall provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly
address the legislative body on any item of interest to the public,before or during the legislative
body’s consideration of the item,that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body.”
Hence, there is nothing to cure or correct.
The speaker card Mr.Higgins completed and submitted to the City Clerk at the outset of the February
25,2019 meeting stated in his handwriting that he wished to speak during the “Public Participation
Topic”regarding the “Hermosa Avenue Project Truck Route.”The speaker card specifically does not
state that Mr.Higgins wished to speak during the City Manager’s Report.Consequently,it was
entirely reasonable for the City Clerk and the Mayor to interpret Mr.Higgins’speaker card to mean
that he wished to speak during Oral Communications;and in fact,he was called upon to speak (for
not more than three minutes)during Oral Communications and did so on the subject of the Hermosa
Avenue Project Truck Route.Had Mr.Higgins’speaker card clearly stated that he wished to speak
during the City Manager’s Report agenda item,he would have been called when that item was taken
up.
There are three other observations to be made.First,the City Manager’s Report is a unilateral and
purely informational report that engenders no action by the Council.Second,had Mr.Higgins spoken
up in some manner at the conclusion of the City Manager’s Report to indicate that he wished to
speak during that agenda item,he would have been allowed to do so.And third,when Mr.Higgins did
speak during Oral Communications immediately following the City Manager’s report,he did not raise
any concerns about not being given an opportunity to speak during the City Manager’s Report.
In Mr.Higgins’letter,he also alleges Brown Act violations because the Council did not immediatelyCity of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0197
In Mr.Higgins’letter,he also alleges Brown Act violations because the Council did not immediately
act upon his demands and instruct staff to “follow-up”on his questions.As Mr.Higgins observes in
his Complaint,there is nothing in the Brown Act that requires the Council to act upon a resident’s
demands or to answer questions.Hence,the Council did not violate the Act for failure to take action
on Mr. Higgins’ issues.
In summary,Mr.Higgins’letter’s first Item does not disclose a violation of the Act.Hence,there is
nothing to cure or correct.
Complaint #2:
“Item 2”of Mr.Higgins’letter suggests that the Council has “imposed administrative procedures”that
limit public comment to one agenda item per meeting.He demands that “the city correct any
administrative procedures that would have tend to have the effect of limiting a citizen’s opportunity to
speak on more than one agenda item per open session of the City Council unless there is a legal
basis and a compelling reason to do so.”
This assertion is patently untrue as evidenced by the Council’s actual practice (witness the Granicus
recording of any Council meeting to see members of the public speaking on multiple agenda items)
and the procedure set forth on the face of the Council agenda,which provides the following times
during which members of the public may speak:
1.During the time allotted to address the City Council on any items within the Council’s
jurisdiction not on this agenda,on items on this agenda as to which public comment will not be
taken, or to request a removal of an item from the consent calendar;
2.During discussions of items removed from the consent calendar;
3.During Public Hearings; and,
4.During discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters.
In short,there is no procedure that limits public comment to just one agenda item per meeting.
Consequently, there is no need for the Council to cure or correct any practice.
Complaint #3:
”Item 3” of Mr. Higgins’ letter does not claim the Council violated the Brown Act. Rather, he demands
“the city clerk, when announcing the restrictions on questions to council members for NON-agenda
items; the city clerk must balance this by informing the public clearly and unambiguously that the
Brown Act does not prohibit questions to council members when an agenda-item is being
considered.”
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0197
The Brown Act does not require the City Clerk to make any announcements regarding the content of
public speech. And, except to the extent that public speech be relevant to the subject matter of the
agenda item and within the jurisdiction of the Council, neither does the Brown Act address whether
public speakers make affirmative statements or ask questions. And, finally, the Act does not require
Councilmembers to answer questions raised by public comments. In short, it is not the City Clerk’s
role to inform the public how to make presentations to the Council.
Consequently, there is no need to cure or correct any practice identified in Mr. Higgins’ Item 3.
Conclusion:
Based on the foregoing, the Complaint is without merit, no violation of the Brown Act occurred at the
February 12, 2019 City Council meeting, and no cure is required. Accordingly, the recommendation
is for City Council to receive and file this report and direct the City Attorney to send the attached letter
(Attachment 2) to Mr. Higgins.
Attachments:
1.Mr. Higgins’ February 25, 2019 Brown Act Cure and Correct Letter
2.Proposed response to Mr. Higgins’ letter
Respectfully Submitted by:Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Concur:Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™
February 25, 2019
Subj: Brown Act “Cure and Correct Demand Letter”.
Presiding Officer,
City Council Members, City Manager, City Clerk & City Attorney
Dear Mayor Amato,
This letter is to call your attention to what I believe have been a series of
actions during past City Council Meeting Open Sessions that directly
violate central provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act; actions when taken
cumulatively, violate both the spirit & purpose of this act. [1,2]
The most recent alleged violation occurred during the 2/12/2019 City
Council Open Session and the nature of these violations are innumerated
below.
Note: Each item listed below should be taken as an individual “Brown Act
“Cure and Correct Demand”. [5]
Item 1:
Denial of the right to public comment on an agenda item before or during
its consideration in the City Council Meeting Open-Session on 2/12/2019.
With regard to Item 1, prior to the Open Session on 2/12/2019 I read the
agenda and noticed that there was an item for a status report on the
Hermosa Avenue Paving-Project.
I immediately sent the city council an email with a list of questions that I
believed would shed-light on why so many heavy trucks were not using the
truck route specified by HB Public Works and rather were using 27th street
at all hours of the day and night.
I asked in that email that the council either ask these questions themselves
or give me the opportunity to do so, either before or at the conclusion of the
staff presentation.
Staff presentations constitute an agenda-item.
I was not given the opportunity to speak before or during the staff
presentation as required by the Brown Act nor was there any request for
staff to follow-up on my questions and suggestions.
The Brown Act specifies that public comment must be heard either before
or at the time the agenda item is being discussed or considered. [ 2 ].
Moreover, Court rulings interpret what constitutes an “agenda-item” broadly
and in a way that includes staff reports and written communications. [ 6 ].
I respectfully demand that members of the public be consistently given an
opportunity to speak to any and all city council agenda items for at least 2
minutes per agenda item.
Item 2:
Denial of the right to comment on more than one agendum item before or
during its consideration in Open Session.
With regard to item 2, Court rulings provide members of the public an
opportunity to speak for a minimum of 2 minutes per agenda item. The
State Attorney General has recommended 5 minutes. [ 2]
But the city has imposed administrative procedures that have the effec t of
limiting the right to speak to only one agenda item per Open Session and
that is a violation of the Brown Act.
The city may not adopt rules that constrain a member of the public from its
right to speak for a minimum of 2 minutes on any agenda item providing the
comments are germane to the agenda item and within the scope of the
council’s jurisdiction. [3,4 ]
Any City Council meeting bylaws that serve to restrict or dilute the public -
right to speak to more than one agendum item per Open Session for a
minimum of two minutes each is a violation of the intent of the Brown Act.
I demand that the city correct any administrative procedures that would
have tend to have the effect of limiting a citizen’s opportunity to speak to
more than one agenda item per Open Session of the City Council unless
there is a legal basis and a compelling reason to do so.
Item 3:
Using the Brown Act to justify denying the public’s right to ask council
members questions on Open Session Agenda Items.
With regard to Item 3 above, the Brown Act is clear on the reasons and
purposes for restricting questions to the city council on non-agenda items
during the Open-Session Public Comment Period.
Public questions to the city council about non-agenda items must be
limited to the questions necessary to determine if a subject should be
added to a future city council meeting agenda.
However, there is NO blanket restriction on public questions to the council
imposed by the Brown Act.
And more to the point, there is NO Brown Act restriction on asking city
council members questions on Open Session Agenda Items.
Any attempt to use the Brown Act to shield the council from the public’s
questions is a mischaracterization of the intent of the Brown Act a d a
misapplication of the law and runs directly counter to the over-arching
purposes of the Brown Act itself. [1,2].
The council members are within their right NOT to answer questions on
Agenda Items, but the public has a right to know that a council member is
refusing to answer certain questions, and obfuscating this knowledge with
administrative regulations runs counter to the core-principles of the Brown
Act. [1,2 ].
A no-response is a response of sorts and that may drive how a citizen
votes in the next city council election.
And if the question is not germane to an Agenda Item or not within the
scope of the council’s jurisdiction, the city is always represented by legal
counsel at Open-Session so the city attorney or his/her designee can
object to an illegitimate question or caution a council member not to
respond.
Therefore, it follows that the city clerk, when announcing the restrictions on
questions to council members for NON-agenda items; the city clerk must
balance this by informing the public clearly and unambiguously that the
Brown Act does not prohibit questions to council members when an
agenda-item is being considered.
In conclusion, the purpose of the Brown Act is to promote transparency and
public participation in local government.
The opportunity to ask questions in open-session related to agenda-items
should be maximized and not minimized whenever possible. [ 2 ]
Thank You,
Anthony Higgins
.........
Footnote [1]
Section 54950, Public commissions, boards, councils and other legislative
bodies of local government agencies exist to aid in the conduct of the
people’s business. The people do not yield their sovereignty to the bodies
that serve them. The people insist on remaining informed to retain control
over the legislative bodies they have created.
The people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct
of the people’s business, and, therefore, the meetings of public bodies and
the writings of public officials and agencies shall be open to public scrutiny.
Regarding this the Official State Brown Act Pamphlet it says the following
regarding the central purposes of the Brown Act:
2)
http://ag.ca.gov/publications/2003_Intro_BrownAct.pdf
…. As the rest of this pamphlet will indicate, the Legislature has established
a presumption in favor of public access. As the courts have stated, the
purpose of the Brown Act is to facilitate public participation in local
government decisions and to curb misuse of the democratic process by
secret legislation by public bodies. (Cohan v. City of Thousand Oaks (1994)
30 Cal.App.4th 547, 555.) To these ends, the Brown Act imposes an “open
meeting” requirement on local legislative bodies. (§ 54953 (a); Boyle v. City
of Redondo Beach (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1116.)
Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code)
In enacting this chapter, the Legislature finds and declares that the public
commissions, boards and councils and the other public agencies in this
State exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business. It is the intent of
the law that their actions be taken openly and that their deliberations be
conducted openly. The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to
the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not
give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to
know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on
remaining informed so that they may retain control over the
instruments they have created
Footnote [2]
Section 54953.7 Greater Openness Encouraged
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, legislative bodies of local
agencies may impose requirements upon themselves which allow greater
access to their meetings than prescribed by the minimal standards set forth
in this chapter. In addition thereto, an elected legislative body of a local
agency may impose such requirements on those appointed legislative
bodies of the local agency of which all or a majority of the members are
appointed by or under the authority of the elected legislative body.
54954.3 PUBLIC TESTIMONY:
Public may comment on agenda items before or during consideration by
legislative body.
Footnote [3]
Time must be set aside for public to comment on any other matters under
the body’s jurisdiction.
Government Code section 54954.3 requires that “every agenda” for the
board’s regular meetings “shall provide an opportunity for members of the
public to directly address the legislative body on any item of interest to the
public BEFORE OR DURING THE LEGISLATIVE BODY’S
CONSIDERATION OF THE ITEM
Footnote [4]
Section 54954.3 Opportunity for public to address legislative body
(a) Every agenda for regular meetings shall provide an opportunity for
members of the public to directly address the legislative body on any item
of interest to the public, before or during the legislative body’s consideration
of the item, that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative
body, provided that no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on
the agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized by subdivision (b) of
Section 54954.2.
However, the agenda need not provide an opportunity for members of the
public to address the legislative body on any item that has already been
considered by a committee, composed exclusively of members of the
legislative body, at a public meeting wherein all interested members of the
public were afforded the opportunity to address the committee on the item,
before or during the committee's consideration of the item, unless the item
has been substantially changed since the committee heard the item, as
determined by the legislative body. Every notice for a special meeting shall
provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the
legislative body concerning any item that has been described in the notice
for the meeting before or during consideration of that item.
(b) The legislative body of a local agency may adopt reasonable
regulations to ensure that the intent of sub- division (a) is carried out,
including, but not limited to, regulations limiting the total amount of time
allocated for public testimony on particular issues and for each individual
speaker.
Note paragraph b. above refers to limiting the time a member of the public
has to speak to a particular agenda item and in no way authorizes the city
to restrict a member from speaking to more than one agenda item.
Footnote [5]
Brown Act Cure & Correct Demand Letters
A Cure and Correct Letter must be sent within 30 days of alleged Brown
Act violations occurring at open and public meetings or within 90 days of
alleged violations that do not occur at open and public meetings.
The Legislative body must correct action within 30 days of receiving the
letter and inform the demanding party in writing of its action or decision not
to take action.
No response for 30 days is considered a decision by the legislative body
not to take action.
Any litigation challenging the legislative body’s response to the cure and
correct demand letter must be taken within 15 days of the body’s official
written response, or within 15 days of the day the legislative body’s 30-day
response deadline passes.
A court may award court costs and reasonable attorney fees to the plaintiff
in an action brought pursuant to Section 54960 or 54960.1, or 54960.2
where it is found that a legislative body of the local agency has violated this
chapter.
Additionally, when an action brought pursuant to Section 54960.2 is
dismissed with prejudice because a legislative body has provided an
unconditional commitment pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of
that section at any time after the 30-day period for making such a
commitment has expired, the court shall award court costs and reasonable
attorney fees to the plaintiff if the filing of that action caused the legislative
body to issue the unconditional commitment. The costs and fees shall be
paid by the local agency and shall not become a personal liability of any
public officer or employee of the local agency.
Footnote [6]
General agenda items such as "New Business," "Old Business," "Executive
Officer's Report," "Committee Reports," "President's Report,"
"Miscellaneous," etc., without specifying the particular matters thereunder,
lack sufficient specificity to meet the standards of the Open Meeting Act
and cannot be used to circumvent the notice requirement of a specific
agenda. The Office of the Attorney General has opined that:
"... the purpose of subdivision (b) [of Government Code Section 11125] is
to provide advance information to interested members of the public
concerning the state body's anticipated business in order that they may
attend the meeting or take whatever other action they deem appropriate
under the circumstances.
***
"We believe that Section 11125 was and is intended to nullify the need for .
. . guesswork or further inquiry on the part of the interested public." (67
Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 85, 87)
Items not included on the agenda may not be acted on or discussed, even
if no action is to be taken by the agency. However, we offer two
suggestions so members of the public and board members may raise
issues that are not on the agenda.
We strongly encourage boards to include an item on their agendas for
"Public Comment on Matters Not on the Agenda." This gives persons who
are attending a meeting an opportunity to raise any issues they may have,
which may not be on the agenda, but which may be appropriate for future
board discussion. Matters raised under this agenda item should be
discussed only to the extent necessary to determine whether they should
be made an agenda item at a future meeting. (§11125.7(a))
It must be reiterated that no action may be taken on any such item and
discussion is limited to that which is necessary to make the determination
as to whether the item will be added to a future board agenda.
The Office of the Attorney General has opined that:
"... the purpose of subdivision (b) [of Government Code Section 11125] is
to provide advance information to interested members of the public
concerning the state body's anticipated business in order that they may
have Opportunity for Public Comment at Meetings
Section 11125.7 addresses the subject of public comment at board
meetings. With specified exceptions, that section requires state agencies to
provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the
state agency on each agenda item before or during the agency's
discussion or consideration of the item. This opportunity for comment need
not be made available if:
1. The agenda item has previously been considered at a public meeting by
a committee comprised exclusively of board members, where members of
the public were provided an opportunity to address the item. However, if
the item has been substantially changed since the committee meeting, a
new opportunity to address the agency would be required at the full board
meeting.
2. The agenda item is one that may properly be considered in closed
session, which would include deliberation and action on disciplinary
proceedings under the Administrative Procedure Act. (§11125.7)
If a board wishes to establish a standing rule that discussion of agenda
items will be given a specified amount of time, or that public comment will
be limited to a certain amount of time, the board may do that by adopting
an administrative regulation. (§11125.7(b))
But these time restrictions may not be onerous to the point that they
unnecessarily circumvent the other central purposes of the Brown Act.
Indian Wells
(760) 568-2611
Irvine
(949) 263-2600
Los Angeles
(213) 617-8100
Ontario
(909) 989-8584
Riverside
(951) 686-1450
Sacramento
(916) 325-4000
San Diego
(619) 525-1300
Walnut Creek
(925) 977-3300
Washington, DC
(202) 785-0600
1230 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 110, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Phone: (310) 643-8448 | Fax: (310) 643-8441 | www.bbklaw.com
March 27, 2019
VIA U.S. MAIL & EMAIL
Anthony Higgins
2705 Morningside Drive,
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Email: Tony.Higgins123@Gmail.com
Dear Mr. Higgins:
This letter responds on behalf of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach (“Council”) to
your “Brown Act Cure and Correct Demand Letter” dated February 25, 2019. The Council
considered your demand letter at its regular meeting of March 26, 2019 and directed me to
transmit this response.
Your letter alleges that the following past actions of the Council violated the Ralph M. Brown
Act (“Brown Act” or “Act”) during the February 12, 2019 Council Meeting:
(1) The Council denied you the right to publicly comment on the City Man ager’s
Report regarding the Hermosa Avenue and Strand Improvement Project.
(2) The Council has imposed administrative procedures that have the effect of
limiting the right of the public to speak on only one agenda item.
(3) The Council has denied the public’s right to ask questions to the Council on
agenda items, and the City Clerk should inform the public of its right to ask
Councilmembers questions.
I address each of your allegations in turn:
(1) You Were Provided The Right To Publicly Comment
In “Item 1” of your letter, you claim that you were not given the opportunity to speak before or
during the presentation of the City Manager’s Report. You further claim that an email you sent to
the Council was not addressed. You demand that “members of the public be consistently given
an opportunity to speak to any and all city council agenda items for at least 2 minutes per agenda
item.”
The Council’s policy and practice is to allow public comment on each agenda item as it comes
up, with the exception of comments on “Miscellaneous Items and Meeting Attendance Reports –
March 27, 2019
Page 2
City Council” and “Other Matters – City Council,” as to which public comments must be made
under Oral Communications. This policy is stated expressly on the agenda. Hence, the City’s
policy and practice is entirely consistent with Government Code section 54954.3, which requires
in relevant part that “[e]very agenda for regular meetings shall provide an opportunity for
members of the public to directly address the legislative body on any item of interest to the
public, before or during the legislative body’s consideration of the item, that is within the subject
matter jurisdiction of the legislative body.” Hence, there is nothing to cure or correct.
The speaker card you completed and submitted to the City Clerk at the outset of the February 25,
2019 meeting stated in your handwriting that you wished to speak during the “Public
Participation Topic” regarding the “Hermosa Avenue Project Truck Route.” The speaker card
specifically does not state that you wished to speak during the City Manager’s Report.
Consequently, it was entirely reasonable for the City Clerk and the Mayor to interpret your
speaker card to mean that you wished to speak during Oral Communications; and in fact, you
were called upon to speak (for not more than three minutes) during Oral Communications and
did so on the subject of the Hermosa Avenue Project Truck Route. Had your speaker card clearly
stated that you wished to speak during the City Manager’s Report agenda item, you would have
been called when that item was taken up.
I would like to make three other observations. First, the City Manager’s Report is a unilateral and
purely informational report that engenders no action by the Council. Second, had you spoken up
in some manner at the conclusion of the City Manager’s Report to indicate that you wished to
speak during that agenda item, you would have been allowed to do so. And third, when you did
speak during Oral Communications immediately following the City Manager’s report, you did
not raise any concerns about not being given an opportunity to speak during the City Manager’s
Report.
In your letter, you also allege Brown Act violations because the Council did not immediately act
upon your demands and instruct staff to “follow-up” on your questions. As you observe, there is
nothing in the Brown Act that requires the Council to act upon a resident’s demands or to answer
questions. Hence, the Council did not violate the Act for failure to take action on your issues.
In summary, your letter’s first Item does not disclose a violation of the Act. Hence, there is
nothing to cure or correct.
(2) The Council Does Not Limit The Right Of The Public To Speak On Only One
Agenda Item Per Session
“Item 2” of your letter suggests that the Council has “imposed administrative procedures” that
limit public comment to one agenda item per meeting. You demand that “the city correct any
administrative procedures that would have tend to have the effect of limiting a citizen’s
March 27, 2019
Page 3
opportunity to speak on more than one agenda item per Open session of the City Council unless
there is a legal basis and a compelling reason to do so.”
This assertion is patently untrue as evidenced by the Council’s actual practice (witness the
Granicus recording of any Council meeting to see members of the public speaking on multiple
agenda items) and the procedure set forth on the face of the Council agenda, which provides the
following times during which members of the public may speak:
(1) During the time allotted to address the City Council on any items within the
Council’s jurisdiction not on this agenda, on items on this agenda as to which
public comment will not be taken, or to request a removal of an item from the
consent calendar;
(2) During discussions of items removed from the consent calendar;
(3) During Public Hearings; and,
(4) During discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters.
In short, there is no procedure that limits public comment to just one agenda item per meeting.
Consequently, there is no need for the Council to cure or correct any practice.
(3) The City Clerk Does Not Need To Announce That The Brown Act Permits
Questions To Councilmembers
”Item 3” of your letter does not claim the Council violated the Brown Act. Rather, you demand
“the city clerk, when announcing the restrictions on questions to council members for NON-
agenda items; the city clerk must balance this by informing the public clearly and unambiguously
that the Brown Act does not prohibit questions to council members when an agenda-item is
being considered.”
The Brown Act does not require the City Clerk to make any announcements regarding the
content of public speech. And, except to the extent that public speech be relevant to the subject
matter of the agenda item and within the jurisdiction of the Council, neither does the Brown Act
address whether public speakers make affirmative statements or ask questions . And, finally, the
Act does not require Councilmembers to answer questions raised by public comments. In short, it
is not the City Clerk’s role to inform the public how to make presentations to the Council.
Consequently, there is no need to cure or correct any practice identified in your Item 3.
The City Council takes the Brown Act seriously and that is why it has given substantial
consideration to your concerns. The Council’s goal is to ensure that the public is given a full
March 27, 2019
Page 4
opportunity to participate during meetings. The Council is committed to transparency, good
governance and compliance with the Brown Act.
Very truly yours,
Michael Jenkins
City Attorney
City of Hermosa Beach
March 26, 2019
To: City Attorney Michael Jenkins
City Manager Suja Lowenthal
City Council Members
Fm: Anthony Higgins
Subj: Draft Response to my Brown Act Cure and Correct Demand &
Recommendation (Report 19-0197)
Thank You for taking the time address the 3 Brown Act Cure and Correct demands
contained in my February 25, 2019 complaint.
I accept your conclusions that no Brown Act violations occurred with the following
caveats:
Item 1 of my Complaint:
Right to Speak before or during staff-reports
City Attorney Draft Response:
The speaker card you completed and submitted to the City Clerk at the outset of
the February 25, 2019 meeting stated in your handwriting that you wished to
speak during the “Public Participation Topic” regarding the “Hermosa Avenue
Project Truck Route.” The speaker card specifically does not state that you wished
to speak during the City Manager’s Report. Consequently, it was entirely
reasonable for the City Clerk and the Mayor to interpret your speaker card to
mean that you wished to speak during Oral Communications; and in fact, you
were called upon to speak (for not more than three minutes) during Oral
Communications and did so on the subject of the Hermosa Avenue Project Truck
Route. Had your speaker card clearly stated that you wished to speak during the
City Manager’s Report agenda item, you would have been called when that item
was taken up.
3/26/19 AGENDA, ITEM 2m - BROWN ACT COMPLAINT FILED BY ANTHONY HIGGINS
SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER SUBMITTED BY ANTHONY HIGGINS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S
OFFICE ON 3/26/19 AT 9:45 A.M.
I would like to make three other observations. First, the City Manager’s Report is a
unilateral and purely informational report that engenders no action by the
Council. Second, had you spoken up in some manner at the conclusion of the City
Manager’s Report to indicate that you wished to speak during that agenda item,
you would have been allowed to do so. And third, when you did speak during Oral
Communications immediately following the City Manager’s report, you did not
raise any concerns about not being given an opportunity to speak during the City
Manager’s Report.
I believe my desire to speak during the agenda-item was abundantly clear in my
email to the Council and the City Manager.
But I failed to copy the city clerk on that email.
I believe the city clerk was aware of this email but she must have felt that the card
superseded my email request to speak during the agenda item.
Therefore, I accept that explanation and concur there was no Brown Act
Violation.
However, please note that I filled out the speaker-card only as a contingency were
I not called up to speak during or before the agenda item per my email request.
I did not know that I could stand up and stop the proceedings and be recognized
by the council at the conclusion of the City Manager’s Report.
Item 2 of my complaint:
Right to speak in both oral communications segment of the Council Meeting
Open Session as well as any agenda items.
City Attorney Draft Response:
“…. In short, there is no procedure that limits public comment to just one agenda
item per meeting. Consequently, there is no need for the Council to cure or correct
any practice”.
COMMENTS:
In my complaint I assert that the city does not provide the opportunity to speak in
the oral communications segment of the Open-Session and then to an agenda
item.
I accept the cities explanation the Council Does Not Limit the Right of The Public
to Speak on Only One Agenda Item Per Session and withdraw this complaint.
What created my confusion was that at the conclusion of each agenda item the
council does not always ask if there are public-comments.
Nor did I realize that I could submit more than one speaker-card per Open-Session
meeting as a tool to facilitate speaking to multiple items
The city might consider making this clearer.
Item 3 of my Complaint:
Clarity on a citizen’s right to ask certain questions related to oral and written-
communications.
City Attorney Response:
” Item 3” of your letter does not claim the Council violated the Brown Act. Rather,
you demand “the city clerk, when announcing the restrictions on questions to
council members for NON- agenda items; the city clerk must balance this by
informing the public clearly and unambiguously that the Brown Act does not
prohibit questions to council members when an agenda-item is being considered.”
The Brown Act does not require the City Clerk to make any announcements
regarding the content of public speech. And, except to the extent that public
speech be relevant to the subject matter of the agenda item and within the
jurisdiction of the Council, neither does the Brown Act address whether public
speakers make affirmative statements or ask questions.
And, finally, the Act does not require Councilmembers to answer questions raised
by public comments.
Consequently, there is no need to cure or correct any practice identified in your
Item 3.
My Response:
A key tenant of the Brown Act is to promote transparent and accountable
government.
Section 54953.7 Greater Openness Encouraged
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, legislative bodies of local agencies
may impose requirements upon themselves which allow greater access to their
meetings than prescribed by the minimal standards set forth in this chapter. In
addition thereto, an elected legislative body of a local agency may impose such
requirements on those appointed legislative bodies of the local agency of which
all or a majority of the members are appointed by or under the authority of the
elected legislative body.
My take-away is that while council members cannot be compelled to answer
questions regarding justifications for NOT recommending that an issue covered in
a written or oral communication be ‘agendized” and/or referred to staff for
further analysis, there is nothing in the brown act that would prohibit me from
asking council members for their justification for tabling an issue.
There are many reasons understanding a council-persons specific justifications for
not “agendizing” an item or referring it to staff for further analysis serves the
public interest.
I believe that when a citizen requests that an issue be agendized or referred to
staff for followup and the council chooses to bury it in the public record with no
further action this justification should be provided by each council person as a
matter of practice.
I will be speaking to this point in tonight’s council meeting.
I appreciate that you have seriously considered my complaint and appreciate the
city’s efforts in this regard.
Thank You
Anthony Higgins
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0180
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT CLAIM
(Human Resources Manager Vanessa Godinez)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council reject the following claim and refer it to the City’s Liability
Claims Administrator.
Claimant: Stephen Allan Diamond
Date of Loss: August 22, 2018
Date Claim Filed: December 31, 2018
Date Revised Claim Filed: January 28, 2019
Allegation: Claimant alleges he stepped into a hole in the walkway near a parking meter at Hermosa
Ave. and 26th Street which resulted in physical injuries to his ankle.
Attachments:
Claim Report for Stephen Allan Diamond
Respectfully Submitted: Vanessa Godinez, Human Resources Manager
Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0192
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
A RESOLUTION OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY
COUNCIL ELECTING TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1.Find that the following proposed action is exempt from review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3);
2.Adopt the following Resolution waiving further reading: a resolution of the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach, California, electing to be exempt from the Congestion Management
Program.
Executive Summary:
The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Agency (Metro)is required by state law to
prepare and update on a biennial basis a Congestion Management Program (CMP)for the County of
Los Angeles.The CMP process was established as part of a 1990 legislative package to implement
Proposition 111,which increased the state gas tax from 9 to 18 cents.The intent of the CMP was to
tie the appropriation of new gas tax revenues to congestion reduction efforts by improving land
use/transportation coordination.
While the CMP requirement was one of the pioneering efforts to conduct performance-based
planning,the approach has become antiquated and expensive.The CMP primarily uses a Level Of
Service (LOS)performance metric which is a measurement of vehicle delay that is now inconsistent
with the new vehicle miles travelled (VMT)state-designated performance measurement
methodology,enacted by SB 743 and scheduled to replace LOS for California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) transportation analysis on July 1, 2020.
In accordance with California Government Code 65088.3 (Attachment 1),jurisdictions within a county
may opt out of the CMP requirement without penalty,if a majority of local jurisdictions representing a
majority of the county’s population formally adopt resolutions requesting to opt out of the program.
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0192
Background:
Under the CMP,88 incorporated cities plus the County of Los Angeles share various statutory
responsibilities and reporting requirements,including monitoring traffic count locations on select
arterials,implementing transportation improvements,adoption of travel demand management and
land use ordinances,and mitigating congestion impacts.A copy of the City’s most recent CMP
reporting document is attached for reference (2015 Administrative Report and Resolution).
The framework for the CMP is firmly grounded in the idea that congestion can be mitigated by
continuing to add capacity to roadways.This is evidenced by the primary metric that drives the
program which is Level of Service (LOS).Recent changes in state laws and rulemaking,namely AB
32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006),SB 375 (Sustainable Communities and Climate
Protection Act of 2008),SB 743 (Environmental quality:transit-oriented infill projects,judicial review
streamlining for environmental leadership development projects),SB 32 (California Global Warming
Solutions Act of 2006),and Measure M all move away from the LOS methodology directly or
indirectly.
The CMP has become increasingly outdated and now contradicts the direction of Metro’s planning
process and regional,state,and federal transportation planning requirements.Therefore,on June 28,
2018 the Metro Board approved a recommendation to initiate the process to opt out of the state
mandated CMP.This action by Metro allows Metro staff to proceed with the next step in the process,
which is to provide its public agency partners with the option to opt out of the CMP as well.
Opting out of the CMP provides the following benefits:
·Eliminates the risk to local jurisdictions of losing state gas tax funds or being ineligible to
receive state and federal Transportation Improvement Program funds, as a result of not being
in compliance with CMP requirements or performance standards.
·Removes the administrative and fiscal burden for monitoring and preparation of reporting
documents to demonstrate compliance with the CMP.
·Relieves Metro and local jurisdictions of the mandate to use a single measure (LOS) to
evaluate traffic impacts in CEQA documents and determine roadway deficiencies.
A number of counties have elected to opt out of the CMP over the years,including San Diego,
Fresno,Santa Cruz and San Luis Obispo.The reasons for doing so are varied but generally concern
redundant,expensive,administrative processes that come with little to no congestion benefit and
continue to mandate the use of LOS to determine roadway deficiencies which is inconsistent with
recent changes in State law.Given Metro’s decision to opt out,many local jurisdictions within Los
Angeles County,which are listed below,have adopted resolutions opting out of the CMP.Most
recently,the neighboring cities of Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach adopted resolutions to be
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0192
recently,the neighboring cities of Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach adopted resolutions to be
exempt from the program on March 12, 2019 and January 15, 2019, respectively.
Metro is currently engaged with 28 cities also considering taking a CMP opt-out resolution to their
governing bodies.Three of those cities are the cities with the largest populations in LA County:City
of Los Angeles,County of Los Angeles,and the City of Long Beach at approximately 5.5 million
residents collectively.Additionally,other South Bay cities are also currently in discussions and
considering a CMP opt-out.
Upon receipt of formally-adopted resolutions from a majority of local jurisdictions representing a
majority of the population,Metro will notify the State Controller,Caltrans,and the Southern California
Association of Governments that Los Angeles County has opted out of the CMP in accordance with
statutory requirements.
To be one of the cities indicating its support to opt out,the City Council must adopt the attached
resolution formally requesting exemption from the Congestion Management Program (Attachment 2).
General Plan Consistency:
PLAN Hermosa,the City’s General Plan,was adopted by the City Council in August 2017.Exemption
from the California Congestion Management Program supports the direction of Metro’s planning
process and regional,state,and federal transportation planning requirements which supports several
PLAN Hermosa goals and policies that are listed below.
1.1 Consider all modes.Require the planning,design,and construction of all new and existing
transportation projects to consider the needs of all modes of travel to create safe,livable and inviting
environments for all users of the system.
5.4 Evaluate projects.Ensure the evaluation of projects for transportation and traffic impacts under
CEQA consider local and statewide goals related to infill development,the promotion of healthy and
active lifestyles through active transportation,and the reduction of greenhouse gases,in addition to
traditional congestion management impacts.
6.1 Regional network.Work with government agencies and private sector companies to develop a
comprehensive,regionally integrated transportation network that connects the community to
surrounding cities.
Fiscal Impact:
There are no costs to the City associated with this action.There may be a positive effect in future
years when the costs associated with monitoring and preparation of CMP compliance documents are
no longer necessary.
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0192
Attachments:
1. California Government Code 65088.3
2. Resolution electing to be exempt from the Congestion Management Program
3.Metro Board Report 6/20/2018 with Attachments
4. Metro CMP Opt-Out FAQ Sheet
Respectfully Submitted by: Kristy Morris, Environmental Analyst
Concur: Lucho Rodriguez
Concur: Ken Robertson
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director
Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/21/2019Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™
65088.3.
This chapter does not apply in a county in which a majority of local governments, collectively comprised
of the city councils and the county board of supervisors, which in total also represent a majority of the
population in the county, each adopt resolutions electing to be exempt from the congestion
management program.
(Added by Stats. 1996, Ch. 293, Sec. 4. Effective January 1, 1997.)
A RESOLUTION OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL ELECTING TO BE
EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, in 1990 the voters of California passed Proposition 111and the
requirement that urbanized counties develop and implement a Congestion Management
Program; and
WHEREAS, the legislature and governor established the specific requirements of
the Congestion Management Program by passage of legislation which was a
companion to Proposition 111 and is encoded in California Government Code Section
65088 to 65089.1 0; and
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority (Metro) has been designated as the Congestion Management Agency
responsible for Los Angeles County's Congestion Management Program; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65089.3 allows urbanized
counties to be exempt from the Congestion Management Program based on resolutions
passed by local jurisdictions representing a majority of a county's jurisdictions with a
majority of the county's population; and
WHEREAS, the Congestion Management Program is outdated and increasingly
out of step with current regional, State, and federal planning processes and
requirements, including new State requirements for transportation performance
measures related to greenhouse gas reduction; and
WHEREAS, on June 28, 2018, the Metro Board of Directors took action to direct
Metro staff to work with local jurisdictions to prepare the necessary resolutions to
exempt Los Angeles County from the Congestion Management Program.
THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL HEREBY RESOLVES
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitations are true and correct.
SECTION 2. The City of Hermosa Beach hereby elects to be exempt from the
Congestion Management Program as described in California Government Code Section
65088 To 65089.10.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution.
ADOPTED on March 26, 2019.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Stacey Armato
Mayor
______________________________________
City Clerk
Metro
Board Report
Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation
Authority
One Gateway Plaza
3rd Floor Board Room
Los Angeles, CA
File #: 2018-0122,File Type: Program Agenda Number: 22.
PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE
JUNE 20, 2018
SUBJECT:CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OPT-OUT
ACTION:APPROVE RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVE initiating the process for Metro and all Los Angeles County local jurisdictions to opt out of
the California Congestion Management Program (CMP), in accordance with State CMP statute.
ISSUE
Metro is required by state law to prepare and update on a biennial basis a Congestion Management
Program (CMP) for the County of Los Angeles. The CMP process was established as part of a 1990
legislative package to implement Proposition 111, which increased the state gas tax from 9 to 18
cents. The intent of the CMP was to tie the appropriation of new gas tax revenues to congestion
reduction efforts by improving land use/transportation coordination.
While the CMP requirement was one of the pioneering efforts to conduct performance-based
planning, the approach has become antiquated and expensive. CMP primarily uses a level of service
(LOS) performance metric which is a measurement of vehicle delay that is inconsistent with new
state-designated performance measures, such as vehicle miles travelled (VMT), enacted by SB 743
for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) transportation analysis.
Pursuant to California Government Code §65088.3 (Attachment A, C.G.C. §65000 et seq.),
jurisdictions within a county may opt out of the CMP requirement without penalty, if a majority of local
jurisdictions representing a majority of the county’s population formally adopt resolutions requesting
to opt out of the program. Given that the CMP has become increasingly out of step with regional,
state, and federal planning processes and requirements, staff recommends that Metro initiate the
process to gauge the interest of local jurisdictions and other stakeholders in opting out of State CMP
requirements.
DISCUSSION
Under the CMP, the 88 incorporated cities plus the County of Los Angeles share various statutory
responsibilities, including monitoring traffic count locations on select arterials, implementing
transportation improvements, adoption of travel demand management and land use ordinances, and
mitigating congestion impacts.
Metro Printed on 6/21/2018Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™
File #: 2018-0122,File Type: Program Agenda Number: 22.
The framework for the CMP is firmly grounded in the idea that congestion can be mitigated by
continuing to add capacity to roadways. This is evidenced by the primary metric that drives the
program which is LOS. Recent state laws and rulemaking, namely AB 32 (California Global
Warming Solutions Act of 2006), SB 375 (Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of
2008), SB 743 (Environmental quality: transit oriented infill projects, judicial review streamlining for
environmental leadership development projects) and SB 32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act
of 2006), all move away from LOS directly or indirectly. Therefore, the CMP contradicts these key
state policies and Metro’s own efforts to promote a more sustainable and equitable region.
A number of counties have elected to opt out of the CMP over the years including San Diego, Fresno,
Santa Cruz and San Luis Obispo counties. The reasons for doing so are varied but generally
concern redundant, expensive, administrative processes that come with great expense, little to no
congestion benefit and continue to mandate the use of LOS to determine roadway deficiencies.
The passage of Measure M and the update of the Long Range Transportation Plan present Metro
with an opportunity to consider new ways to measure transportation system performance, measures
that complement efforts to combat climate change, support sustainable, vibrant communities and
improve mobility. For Metro and cities alike, the continued administration of the CMP is a distraction
at best or an impediment at worst to improving our transportation system.
Over the last several years, the CMP has become increasingly outdated in relation to the direction of
Metro’s planning process and regional, state, and federal transportation planning requirements.
Additional reasons to opt out of the CMP include:
· Relieves Metro and local jurisdictions of a mandate to use a single measure (LOS) to
determine roadway deficiencies.
· Eliminates the risk to local jurisdictions of losing their state gas tax funds or being ineligible to
receive state and federal Transportation Improvement Program funds, as a result of not being
in compliance with CMP requirements or performance standards.
·Eliminates the administrative and financial burden to cities associated with the preparation of
documents to demonstrate conformance with the CMP.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Metro could continue to implement the CMP as adopted by the Board or look to update the program.
We do not recommend this as we have examined multiple ways to adapt state legislative
requirements, but we have been unable to fit Los Angeles county mobility complexities to statutory
requirements in a manner that achieves consensus of our stakeholders over the twenty-five-year life
of the program. Opting out of the CMP gives Metro the flexibility to implement mobility improvements
through the programs and projects in the Long Range Transportation Plan adopted by the Board,
while furthering improvements to transportation capacity, choice and cost-effectiveness.
DETERMINATION OF SAFETY IMPACT
This Board action will have no adverse impact on safety standards for Metro.
Metro Printed on 6/21/2018Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™
File #: 2018-0122,File Type: Program Agenda Number: 22.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the current fiscal year budget, nor any anticipated impact to future budgets or
the continued flow of state gas tax revenues to local jurisdictions. The recommended action may
have a positive impact on Metro and local jurisdiction budgets in future years by eliminating the
annual costs associated with implementing the CMP. Annual costs to local agencies vary based on
size but generally require a staff commitment of 25-60 hours per jurisdiction plus the cost of
conducting traffic counts at the 164 CMP intersections at a cost of approximately $250 per
intersection. For Metro the annual burden of administering the CMP is approximately 1.2 Full Time
Equivalents (FTE).
NEXT STEPS
Upon Board approval, staff will proceed in consulting with local jurisdictions and other interested
stakeholders as follows:
·Consult with the Metro Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) regarding opting out of the CMP
and conduct a workshop of our stakeholders to receive input on the interest in opting out of the
CMP.
·With the concurrence of the TAC and workshop participants, request local jurisdictions to
consider adopting draft resolution (Attachment B) to opt out of the program.
·Upon receipt of formally-adopted resolutions from a majority of local jurisdictions representing
a majority of the population, notify the State Controller, Caltrans, and SCAG that Los Angeles
County has opted out of the CMP in accordance with statutory requirements.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - CMP legislation
Attachment B - Draft Resolution to Opt Out of the Congestion Management Program in Los Angeles
County
Prepared by: Paul Backstrom, Manager, Countywide Planning & Development, (213) 922-2183
Mark Yamarone, DEO, Countywide Planning & Development, (213) 418-3452
Kalieh Honish, EO, Countywide Planning & Development, (213) 922-7109
Manjeet Ranu, SEO, Countywide Planning & Development, (213) 418-3157
Reviewed by: Therese W. McMillan, Chief Planning Officer, (213) 922-7077
Metro Printed on 6/21/2018Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™
File #: 2018-0122,File Type: Program Agenda Number: 22.
Metro Printed on 6/21/2018Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™
September 28, 2018
LA Metro Congestion Management Program
Opt-Out FAQ
What is the Congestion Management Program (CMP)?
The CMP is a 1990 era state-mandated performance-based planning program that
attempts to link land use and transportation decisions.
Who are the parties responsible for implementation of the CMP?
Metro is the Congestion Management Agency charged with administering the
state-mandated program. All 89 jurisdictions (88 cities plus the County of Los
Angeles) are responsible for compliance with the provisions of the program.
Why is Metro recommending an opt-out of the CMP?
While the CMP requirement was one of the pioneering efforts to conduct
performance-based planning, the approach has become antiquated. CMP
primarily uses a level of service (LOS) performance metric which is a
measurement of vehicle delay that is inconsistent with new state-designated
performance measures, such as vehicle miles travelled (VMT), enacted by SB 743
for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) transportation analysis.
Is Metro replacing the CMP?
No, this is not a replacement effort. The opt-out is strictly about removing the LA
County region from the state-mandated requirements of the CMP. Cities will
retain local control over land use decisions.
What are the requirements to opt out of the CMP?
A majority consensus of 45 jurisdictions representing approximately 5.1 million
people in the County of Los Angeles is required to opt out formally.
September 28, 2018
Pursuant to California Government Code §65088.3 (Attachment A, C.G.C. §65000
et seq.), jurisdictions within a county may opt out of the CMP requirement
without penalty, if a majority of local jurisdictions representing a majority of the
county’s population formally adopt resolutions requesting to opt out of the
program.
Has Metro contacted representatives from the City of LA and or the County?
Recognizing the population that needs to be achieved for a successful opt-out,
Metro did consult with City and County of Los Angeles officials to ensure that
their respective agencies were amenable to the idea. Any final decision to opt out
would require approval from their respective governing bodies.
Has Metro contacted anyone from the state about the decision to proceed with
an opt-out?
Yes. Metro consulted with the State Controller’s Office, Office of Planning and
Research, Caltrans and the California Transportation Commission prior to
initiating the opt-out process. None of the state agencies referenced raised any
concerns.
Will local jurisdictions continue to receive their apportionment of 2105 gas tax
funds if the opt-out is successful?
Yes. Cities will continue to receive gas taxes tied to the CMP.
Have other regions have opted out of the CMP?
Yes. Some of the regions that have opted out of the CMP include: Fresno, Santa
Cruz, San Luis Obispo, Sacramento, Sonoma and San Diego.
What does Metro need from local jurisdictions who wish to opt out of the CMP?
Metro needs local jurisdictions to formally adopt resolutions requesting to opt
out of the program. A sample resolution is attached to this email. Once your
governing body has adopted the resolution, please scan and send the final signed
copy to Paul Backstrom backstromp@metro.net.
September 28, 2018
What is your timeline for completing the opt-out?
Metro encourages local jurisdictions to adopt resolutions as soon as possible.
Metro intends to provide an update to our Board in June. To meet that internally
imposed timeline, Metro asks that local jurisdictions do their best to provide
Metro with adopted resolutions by March 29, 2019.
What happens to our debits and credits accumulated under the CMP?
The debits and credits will exist and remain in our records but hold no current
value outside of the CMP program.
What happens to the transportation demand ordinances that cities adopted to
comply with the provisions of the CMP?
The ordinances remain intact as part of each city’s municipal code. The only thing
that would change is that cities would retain the option to remove or update
those ordinances at their own discretion.
What if the effort to opt out is unsuccessful?
Should efforts to opt-out fail, Metro would continue to enforce the requirements
of the CMP.
Who can I contact for more information?
Paul Backstrom by email backstromp@metro.net or by phone 213.922.2183.
From: noreply@granicusideas.com <noreply@granicusideas.com>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 3:31 PM
To: Ann Yang <anny@hermosabch.org>
Subject: New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular
Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
New eComment for City Council Special Meeting
(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -
7:00 P.M.)
David Grethen submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: 2o) REPORT 19-0192 A RESOLUTION OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
ELECTING TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA CONGESTION MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Exemption from the Congestion Management Program (CMP) may well have
advantages including administrative efficiency and alignment with evolving state policies. It
seems that these policies include an emphasis on reduction in vehicles versus increases in road
capacity, as evidenced by changes to use a metric of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) instead of
level of service (LOS - delays).as part of project evaluations under CEQA. We should
nonetheless acknowledge the potential benefits of LOS analysis, and hopefully will not be
precluded from utilizing it in the future on a case-by-case basis even if we become exempt from
CMP. Recall how LOS analysis has recently benefited our community through identification of
traffic concerns and mitigation measures for the recent Skechers and North School project EIRs.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0204
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
NORTH SCHOOL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
SUBCOMMITTEE AND MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FULFILLMENT OVERSIGHT ROLE
(City Manager Suja Lowenthal)
Recommended Action:
The North School Reconstruction Project Subcommittee (Subcommittee)members recommend that
the City Council authorize the Subcommittee to continue to serve as the Council’s representatives on
the joint City and Hermosa Beach City School District collaborative charged with overseeing the
fulfillment of the North School Reconstruction Project Memorandum of Understanding executed on
February 27, 2019.
Executive Summary:
On January 31,2019,the City Council created and appointed a temporary subcommittee to
represent the City on the joint City and Hermosa Beach City School District collaborative to negotiate
elements of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between the two parties delineating mutually
agreed upon outcomes through the North School Reconstruction Project.On February 27,2019,an
MOU was signed by the City of Hermosa Beach and Hermosa Beach City School District
demonstrating the commitment to work together collaboratively to safely manage transportation,
traffic,and student loading and unloading activities,primarily through the development and
implementation of a Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP).
Background:
In January 2019,Council appointed Mayor Stacey Armato and Councilmember Justin Massey to the
North School Reconstruction Project temporary subcommittee to negotiate on behalf of the City with
the Hermosa Beach City School District regarding commitments and responsibilities related to
reconstruction of North Elementary School located at 417 25th Street.
On February 27,2019,the City and School District approved a Memorandum of Understanding
(Attachment 1)to address North School project transportation,traffic,student loading and unloading,
pedestrian and vehicle travel routes,offsite drop-off locations,cost sharing and other key issues.The
MOU provides for retaining a transportation planner/traffic engineer,development of a Neighborhood
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0204
MOU provides for retaining a transportation planner/traffic engineer,development of a Neighborhood
Traffic Management Plan,scheduling of community meetings,and completion of other key
milestones as detailed in a staff report presented to Council on February 26, 2019 (Attachment 2).
Discussion:
On March 18,2019,at a joint meeting between the Hermosa Beach City School District and City
Council,School Board President Douglas Gardner outlined key project timeline and milestone dates
for approvals,construction,and opening of the school including Coastal Commission project
approval, and pursuit of state matching funds by the School District to defray the cost of the project.
The School Board and Council also noted the key MOU deliverables including development of the
joint Request for Proposals (RFP)for the development of a Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan.
Staff anticipates returning to Council with a Draft Scope of Work for this RFP and an updated timeline
for the NTMP process on April 9th.
To ensure that the MOU elements are addressed and project planning,operational,fiscal and
administrative obligations are met,it is recommended that Council authorize the North School
Reconstruction Project Subcommittee to continue representing the City on the joint City and
Hermosa Beach City School District collaborative charged with overseeing the fulfillment of the North
Elementary School Project Memorandum of Understanding.
General Plan Consistency:
PLAN Hermosa,the City’s General Plan,was adopted by the City Council in August 2017.The
development of the NTMP related to North School would help implement our collective community
vision to provide exceptional local schools to the Hermosa Beach community and support several
goals of the Governance Element, Land Use Element, and Mobility Element.
Governance Element
Goal 1 - A high degree of transparency and integrity in the decision-making process.
·1.6 Long-term considerations.Prioritize decisions that provide long-term community benefit
and discourage decisions that provide short-term community benefit but reduce long-term
opportunities.
Goal 2 - The community is active and engaged in decision-making process.
·2.7 Major planning efforts.Require major planning efforts,policies,or projects to include a
public engagement effort.
Goal 8 - A performance-based management and benchmarking program.
·8.1 Community Indicators.Utilize performance metrics,standards,and data collection
procedures to evaluate progress towards goals.
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0204
Land Use Element
Goal 7 -Adequate space and appropriate integration of community and school facilities that support
physical activity, civic life and social connections for residents of all ages and interests.
·7.3 School modernization upgrades.Support Hermosa Beach City School District plans to
renovate and modernize school facilities to meet evolving educational needs in a manner that
minimizes burdens to adjacent neighborhoods.
·7.4 Flexible use of school facilities.Collaborate with the school district to identify appropriate
temporary and flexible uses of school facilities that minimize impacts to surrounding
neighborhoods during dips or fluctuations in school enrollment numbers.
Mobility Element
7.1 Safe public right-of-ways.Encourage that all public right-of-ways are safe for all users at all times
of day where users of all ages and ability feel comfortable participating in both motorized and non-
motorized travel.
Fiscal Impact:
While there is no direct fiscal impact associated with this action,as with other subcommittees,staff
time will be utilized for coordination and implementation of work plans.The City would share costs
with the Hermosa Beach City School District related to the Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan,
resultant infrastructure upgrades and operational costs as specified in the project Memorandum of
Understanding.
Attachments:
1. Link to North Elementary School Project Memorandum of Understanding - 02-27-19
2. Link to City Council 02-26-19 Meeting - Item 6b
Respectfully Submitted by: Kevin Nagata, Management Analyst
Concur: Leeanne Singleton, Environmental Analyst
Concur: Nico De Anda-Scaia, Assistant to the City Manager
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director
Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0187
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
APPROVAL OF LETTER OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 377
(GARCIA): MICROENTERPRISE HOME KITCHEN OPERATIONS
(Assistant to the City Manager Nico De Anda-Scaia)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign a letter of opposition
on behalf of the City regarding Assembly Bill 377 (AB 377)related to permitting and regulation of
microenterprise home kitchen operations, to be shared with key legislators and local stakeholders.
Executive Summary:
Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign a letter of opposition to
urgency bill AB 377,which,if passed,would remove the authority of the City to regulate
microenterprise home kitchen operations (MEHKOs),or small restaurants and associated services
run out of private homes,if permitted by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health.AB
377 would amend state law under AB 626,which took effect January 1,2019,and clarify the
regulatory authority provided to counties and cities over MEHKOs.
Background:
The California State Assembly Committee on Health is currently considering an urgency bill (AB 377)
authored by State Assemblymember Eduardo Garcia,which would remove the authority of cities to
regulate microenterprise home kitchen operations or “MEHKOs”.
A MEHKO is a food facility operated out of a private home.Operators may sell individual meals
directly to consumers for pick-up,delivery or for dining onsite,similar to a restaurant.Among other
requirements,MEHKOs are limited to one fulltime equivalent employee,not including a family or
household member;and may serve no more than 30 individual meals per day and 60 meals per
week,with total gross annual sales of $50,000 or less.MEHKOs are classified and permitted
separately from catering operations,which provide food for events at a location separate from where
the food is prepared,and cottage food operators,preparers of “non-potentially hazardous”food from
a private home-breads,cookies,candy,etc.excluding cream,custard,meat and other foods
requiring time/temperature controls.
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0187
Assembly Bill 626 (AB 626),effective January 1,2019,established MEHKOs as a permitted
residential use.As enacted,the City Attorney advised the law is ambiguous as to whether a local
jurisdiction may prohibit these land uses in its residential zones.The current statute states that cities
and counties have “full discretion”to authorize the permitting of MEHKOs,while also providing that if
a county permits them, a city has no authority to disallow them.1
As of late March 2019,the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health has not yet commenced
issuing MEHKO permits,so there are currently no MEHKOs legally operating in the City.City
Attorney staff has been in contact with Los Angeles County legal counsel and has advised the
Department of Public Health is expected to reach out to cities with an update on next steps.
Analysis:
Early this year,cities were notified that an ad hoc committee of an association of county health
directors-the California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health (“CCDEH”)-was working
with Assemblymember Garcia to pass an urgency bill that would amend the statute.The anticipated
amendments were expected to include language that would clarify cities’discretion to opt out of a
county’s MEHKO permitting program.
However,contrary to expectations,the proposed urgency bill,AB 377,completely removes cities’
authority to restrict MEHKOs within their jurisdictions.Rather than clarify the existing ambiguity in the
law in favor of cities'autonomy over matters of land use,AB 377 clarifies the law in favor of state
preemption.Specifically,the bill provides that county health departments may authorize the
permitting of MEHKOs in the unincorporated areas and within incorporated cities-and once a county
opts in, cities within the county cannot opt out.
The CCDEH has stated that this legislative change came as a surprise to its legislative committee
and was entirely the decision of the bill author.It appears the intent of the change was to avoid
instances where MEHKOs would be permitted in some jurisdictions,but not in others according to the
local balance of competing land uses;and is documented in AB 377 as the reason for the necessity
of the urgency statute.
The proposed letter of opposition (Attachment 1)to AB 377 addressed to Assemblymember Garcia
would communicate the City’s concerns over the loss of local control as a result of this legislation.As
written,AB 377 would take away the City’s authority over zoning and land use,potentially exposing
the community to negative impacts of commercial enterprises sited in residential zones including
______________________________________________________________
1 Cal.
Health & Safety Code, § 114367, subds. (a), (b).
traffic congestion,parking,excessive noise,sanitation,and building/fire code issues.While
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0187
traffic congestion,parking,excessive noise,sanitation,and building/fire code issues.While
appreciating the Assemblymember’s effort to support home businesses and promote the informal
food economy,the letter would reinforce that the regulation of MEHKOs would best be entrusted to
local elected officials,commissions and staff,with public participation,who are the most
knowledgeable about local compatibility and conditions.Staff recommends Council approve and
authorize the Mayor to sign the letter of opposition to AB 377,to be transmitted at the earliest
possible opportunity prior to the State taking up the bill for final approval.
General Plan Consistency:
This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s
General Plan.The letter of opposition to AB 377 related to microenterprise home kitchen operations
would assist in fulfilling the following goals:
Governance Element
5.1 Residential and commercial compatibility.Provide a balance between residential and commercial
uses and strive to ensure their compatibility.
5.2 Development decisions.Strive to conduct the development review process in a consistent and
predictable manner.
Land Use Element
1.7 Compatibility of uses.Ensure the placement of new uses does not create or exacerbate
nuisances between different types of land uses.
2.5 Neighborhood preservation.Preserve and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods by
avoiding or abating the intrusion of disruptive, nonconforming buildings and uses.
2.12 Design of single-family homes.Maintain and enhance the character of single-family home
neighborhoods by allowing home occupations in neighborhoods so long as there is no significant
impact on the surrounding residential uses.
Public Safety Element
7.1 Noise analysis and mitigation.Require all proposed development projects and modifications to
existing developments to be compatible with the existing and future noise levels by using the Land
Use/Noise Compatibility matrix, or equivalent city policy or code.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.If passed,AB 377 would allow the City to
require MEHKOs to obtain a business license,which is anticipated to bring in a nominal amount of
revenue.As written,the current law,AB 626,does not allow the City to require MEHKOs to obtain
business licenses.
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0187
Attachments:
1. Draft Letter of Opposition to AB 377
2. AB 377 - Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations
3. AB 626 - California Retail Food Code: Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations
Respectfully Submitted by: Kevin Nagata, Management Analyst
Concur: Nico De Anda-Scaia, Assistant to the City Manager
Concur: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director
Noted for Fiscal Impact:Viki Copeland, Finance Director
Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™
City of Hermosa Beach
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
March 26, 2019
The Honorable Eduardo Garcia
California State Assembly
Capitol Office, Room 4140
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0056
RE: AB 377 (Garcia): Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations
NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
Dear Assemblymember Garcia:
The City of Hermosa Beach respectfully opposes Assembly Bill (“AB”) 377 concerning
microenterprise home kitchen operations (“MEHKOs”). The Assemblymember’s bill allows
private homes to be used in the direct sale of meals for consumer pick-up, delivery, and onsite
dining—much like a restaurant. The law thus implicates both environmental health and local
land use. Yet the bill negates cities’ land use authority, and its provisions for the regulation of
environmental health fail to appreciate the role of cities—in partnership with county health
officials—in enforcing local fire and building codes and otherwise ensuring the health, safety,
and welfare of a community.
Our concerns start with AB 626, the Assemblymember’s initial legislative effort to authorize
MEHKOs, which took effect January 1, 2019. This statute presents problematic ambiguities with
respect to local authority. It grants cities and counties alike “full discretion” over the permitting
of MEHKOs in their jurisdictions, while also providing that if a county permits them, a city has no
authority to disallow them.1
At a meeting of county health officers and city managers in January—called by the
Environmental Health Division of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health—cities
were informed that the California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health (“CCDEH”)
was working with the bill author to amend the current statute. The anticipated amendments were
to clarify cities’ authority to opt out of a county’s MEHKO program. We are alarmed that the
Assemblymember’s proposed urgency bill, AB 377, clarifies the existing ambiguity in favor of
state preemption, at the expense of cities’ constitutional autonomy over matters of land use.
For nearly a century courts have held that zoning and land use are “intensely local areas of the
law” subject to a city’s police powers.2 This is because the validity of denying a particular
development or a particular land use often comes down to whether a use is “a right thing in the
wrong place”—a question that depends on the circumstances and the locality.3
1 Cal. Health & Safety Code, § 114367, subds. (a), (b).
2 Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 1152, 1179; see e.g., Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty
Co.(1926) 272 U.S. 365.
3 Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co.(1926) 272 U.S. 365, 388.
City of Hermosa Beach
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
Local authority is at its height respecting the creation and maintenance of residential zones that
restrict commercial uses. Commercial uses can expose a community to significant harmful
impacts. These impacts include traffic congestion and attending parking issues (as residential
streets cannot accommodate the level of traffic that a business would likely attract, or hope for).
Businesses also create noise impacts and, restaurants in particular, generate higher volumes
of waste and require levels of ventilation that necessitate sanitation standards, building
standards, and provisions for emergency services unlike what is or should be required in
residential zones.
We understand, and our land use regulations reflect, that not all home businesses conflict with
residential uses. This determination of compatibility, however, has long been entrusted with
elected officials, commissions, and experts in city departments at the local level with public
participation. Determining a neighborhood’s noise tolerance, determining building code and fire
hazards associated with certain uses, and anticipating the behaviors and unintended
consequences of removing regulatory barriers to commercial activity all demand a level of
regulatory detail and local knowledge that AB 377 fails to capture and ultimately voids.
While the City appreciates the Assemblymember’s effort to support enterprising home cooks
and promote the informal food economy, these goals cannot dispense with the established role
of local government in regulating and balancing competing uses. As a matter of local land use
and zoning, whether or not to permit MEHKOs is a determination for local officials who are
steeped in their jurisdiction’s rules, physical conditions, and political sensitivities. Cities like ours
are best positioned to protect a community’s quality of life and the health and safety of both
home kitchen operators and their neighbors.
For these reasons, the City of Hermosa Beach respectfully opposes AB 377.
Sincerely,
Stacey Armato, Mayor
City of Hermosa Beach
Page 1 of 94
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
MEETING CAPTIONS
MARCH 26, 2019 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
**************************************************************************************************************************
Disclaimer: Caption text employs contractions, paraphrasing and other techniques to keep pace with the
meeting. Captions may also suffer from typographical errors. Hence, captions should not be considered
complete or official transcriptions of the meeting.
**************************************************************************************************************************
[01:39:00] >> ALRIGHT EVERYBODY, I CALL TO ORDER
[01:39:03] THE MARCH 26, REGULAR
[01:39:05] MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL. WILL MAX
[01:39:11] RILEY PLEASE LEAD US IN
[01:39:13] THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE?
[01:39:19] >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF
[01:39:20] THE UNITED STATES OF
[01:39:21] AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT
[01:39:22] STANDS, ONE NATION,
[01:39:37] UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND
[01:39:38] JUSTICE FOR ALL.
[01:39:39] >> ALRIGHT. MADAM CLERK, ROLL CALL.
[01:39:43] >> THANK YOU. DUCLOS, HERE. MASSEY,
[01:39:44] HERE. FANGARY, HERE.
[01:39:54] CAMPBELL, HERE. ARMATO, HERE.
[01:39:57] >> MR. CITY ATTORNEY WILL YOU DELIVER
[01:39:58] THE CLOSED SESSION
[01:40:01] REPORT.
[01:40:02] >> THANK YOU MAYOR THERE WERE NO
[01:40:03] COMMENTS ON THE CLOSED
[01:40:04] SESSION AGENDA WHEN THE COUNCIL CALLED
[01:40:05] THE MEETING TO ORDER AT
[01:40:08] 5:30 AND NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS TAKEN.
[01:40:14] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO MY COLLEAGUES
[01:40:15] HAVE ANNOUNCEMENTS?
[01:40:18] COUNCIL MEMBER FANGARY.
[01:40:19] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. I WANT TO
[01:40:20] QUICKLY ACKNOWLEDGE AND
[01:40:24] THANK THE [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] HEALTH
[01:40:25] DISTRICT AND FORMER CITY
[01:40:28] MANAGER TOM BACKLY BEING HERE SATURDAY
[01:40:29] AT THE COMMUNITY FIRST
[01:40:32] MEETING AND GIVING A PRESENTATION ABOUT
[01:40:33] THE SOUTH DISTRICT
[01:40:35] PLANS. IT WAS REALLY INTERESTING TO ME
[01:40:36] TO SEE WHAT THEY HAVE
Page 2 of 94
[01:40:39] IN MIND. THEY HAD A OPEN HOUSE IN THE
[01:40:40] FACILITY AT 10 O'CLOCK
[01:40:45] AND TOM SAID THEY HAD A REALLY GOOD
[01:40:46] ATTENDANCE, ALL MOST 200
[01:40:48] PEOPLE THERE, SO IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN
[01:40:49] FULLY INFORMED ON THE BC
[01:40:53] SOUTH DISTRICT PLANS GOING FORWARD, THEY
[01:40:54] HAVE I BELIEVE A 15
[01:40:57] YEAR SCHEDULE FOR VARIOUS THINGS AND
[01:40:58] VARIOUS PHASES ARE GOING
[01:41:00] THROUGH, SO I THINK IT WAS A GREAT
[01:41:01] PRESENTATION AND IF YOU ARE
[01:41:05] NOT WELL INFORMED ABOUT THE PROCESS I'M
[01:41:06] SURE THEY HAVE
[01:41:08] INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE WEBSITE.
[01:41:09] THEY ARE GOING TO START
[01:41:10] THE I GUESS THE EIR PROCESS AND FULL
[01:41:11] PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN
[01:41:15] APRIL SO LOOK FORWARD FOR ANNOUNCEMENTS
[01:41:16] FROM THEM ABOUT EVENTS
[01:41:20] AND ACTIVITIES AND GET ENGAGED AND HEAR
[01:41:21] WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY
[01:41:26] BECAUSE EXCITED FOR THE PLANS IN THE
[01:41:27] NEXT 15 YEARS FOR THE
[01:41:29] SOUTH BAY. THANK YOU, MAYOR.
[01:41:30] >> THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER DUCLOS.
[01:41:33] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THIS PAST
[01:41:34] WEEK I HAD THE
[01:41:38] OPPORTUNITY TO REPRESENT THE CITY AT TWO
[01:41:39] PARTICULAR EVENTS ON
[01:41:42] THURSDAY AND THEN AGAIN ON FRIDAY. ON
[01:41:43] THURSDAY, THE AMERICAN
[01:41:46] ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS HAD A COMMUNITY
[01:41:47] TOWN HALL ADDRESSING THE
[01:41:52] ISSUE RELATED TO TEEN AGE VAPING, AND I
[01:41:53] WAS HAPPY TO
[01:41:59] PARTICIPATE IN THAT BECAUSE OF OUR
[01:42:00] RECENT ORDINANCE. THEY
[01:42:03] WERE VERY INTERESTED WHAT WE WERE DOING
[01:42:04] FROM THE CITY. THERE
[01:42:07] WERE SPEAKERS FROM AMERICAN ACADEMY OF
[01:42:08] PEDIATRICS AND THE
[01:42:13] DIRECTOR OF CHRONIC DISEASE AND INJURY
[01:42:14] PREVENTION FOR LOS
[01:42:17] ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH WAS THERE.
[01:42:18] PROGRAM COORDINATORS
[01:42:20] FOR THE LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF EDUCATION
Page 3 of 94
[01:42:21] TOBACCO USE PREVENTION
[01:42:25] PROGRAM, AND ALSO DR. ALICE COOHOO,
[01:42:26] PRESIDENT OF AMERICAN
[01:42:31] ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS TEENAGE vaping
[01:42:32] HEALTH CRISIS MANAGEMENT.
[01:42:38] ON FRIDAY, I ATTENDED ANOTHER EVENT ON
[01:42:39] BEHALF OF THE CITY FOR
[01:42:44] THE URBAN COUNTIES FLAVORED TOBACCO
[01:42:45] TRAINING PROGRAM, AND IN
[01:42:52] THAT THERE WERE A NUMBER OF PEOPLE
[01:42:53] SPEAKING BESIDE MYSELF.
[01:43:02] SENIOR DIRECTOR FOR THE AMERICAN LUNG
[01:43:03] ASSOCIATION FOR
[01:43:04] CALIFORNIA WAS A KEY SPEAKER. THERE WAS
[01:43:05] PROGRAM-NUMBER OF
[01:43:09] DIRECTORS FROM DIFFERENT REGIONAL
[01:43:10] PROGRAMS, THE PROGRAM
[01:43:11] DIRECTOR FOR THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
[01:43:12] PUBLIC HEALTH. ALAMEDA
[01:43:16] COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT, POLICY
[01:43:17] DIRECTOR, THE PROJECT
[01:43:20] DIRECTOR FOR CONTRA COSTA HEALTH
[01:43:21] SERVICES. SAN MATEO COUNTY
[01:43:27] HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH EDUCATOR WAS THERE
[01:43:28] AND JOINING ME ON THE
[01:43:31] PANEL WAS MAYOR JOHN MARISH WHO IS THE
[01:43:32] MAYOR OF THE CITY OF
[01:43:36] BEVERLY HILLS. AND, THESE DISCUSSIONS
[01:43:37] WERE IMPORTANT BUT
[01:43:44] CERTAINLY RAISED IN VALUE TO ME BY
[01:43:45] PARTICIPATING IN THEM IN
[01:43:50] THAT AS YOU MAY KNOW, THE ISSUES RELATED
[01:43:51] TO teenage vaping E
[01:43:59] CIGARETTES HAS BEEN SAID BY THE SURGEON
[01:44:00] GENERAL TO BE A
[01:44:05] PENDING EPIDEMIC, BUT I THINK IN TRUTH,
[01:44:06] IT'S EPIDEMIC THAT IS
[01:44:12] UPON US CLEARLY IN THIS COMMUNITY. IT
[01:44:13] SEEMS THE PROBLEM STEMS
[01:44:17] FROM THE FACT THAT TEEN-AGERS ARE
[01:44:18] OVERLOOKING OR UNDER
[01:44:23] ESTIMATING A KEY INGREDIENT IN THE
[01:44:24] VAPORS THEY INHALE AND IT
[01:44:28] IS HIGHLY ADDICTIVE NICOTINE. IT IS
[01:44:29] POSSIBLE TO BUY LIQUID
[01:44:33] AND POD REFILLS WITHOUT NICOTINE, THEY
[01:44:34] ARE HARD TO FIND.
Page 4 of 94
[01:44:37] WHILE A TEEN-WHEN A TEEN INHALES VAPORS
[01:44:38] LACED WITH NICOTINE
[01:44:43] THE DRUG IS QUICKLY ABSORBED THROUGH THE
[01:44:44] BLOOD VESSELS LININGS
[01:44:47] OF THE LUNGS, IT REACHES THE BRAIN IN
[01:44:48] ABOUT 10 SECONDS, AND
[01:44:51] WELL OVER TWO MILLION MIDDLE SCHOOL,
[01:44:52] HIGH SCHOOL COLLEGE TEENS
[01:44:56] ARE USING SUCH DEVICES AND IT IS CLEARLY
[01:44:57] HAPPENING IN THE
[01:45:01] COMMUNITY. THOSE NUMBERS ARE CURRENTLY
[01:45:02] UNDER STATED FROM
[01:45:05] EVERYTHING WE ARE HEARING AND THE ISSUE
[01:45:06] STEMS FROM THE FACT
[01:45:08] THAT YOUNGER-THE YOUNGER THE DEVELOPING
[01:45:09] BRAIN IS EXPOSED TO
[01:45:12] NICOTINE, THE STRONGER AND MORE RAPID
[01:45:13] THE ADDICTION AND THE
[01:45:17] EARLIER THE YOUNG PERSON BECOMES
[01:45:18] ADDICTED, THE HARDER IT IS
[01:45:22] FOR THEM TO QUIT. HEALTH OFFICIALS
[01:45:23] WORRIED FOR YEARS
[01:45:27] ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES CAN LEAD KIDS TO
[01:45:28] SMOKING TRADITIONAL
[01:45:32] CIGARETTES AND THAT CONCERN IS BEGINNING
[01:45:33] TO BE REALIZED. THE
[01:45:35] MAJORITY OF TEENAGERS WHO PICK UP E
[01:45:36] CIGARETTES NEVER SMOKED A
[01:45:41] TRADITIONAL CIGARETTE AND NOW ACCORDING
[01:45:42] TO RESEARCH ARE 4
[01:45:45] TIMES MORE LIKELY TO DO SO. THOUGH THE
[01:45:46] FEDERAL DRUG
[01:45:47] ADMINISTRATION HAS LONG HISTORY OF
[01:45:48] PREVENTATIVE PROGRAMS, THEY
[01:45:51] HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO KEEP PACE WITH THE
[01:45:52] vaping EXPLOSION.
[01:45:56] THERE ARE NO FDA APPROVED NICOTINE
[01:45:57] CESSATION PRODUCTS FOR E
[01:46:00] CIGARETTE USERS UNDER 18 YEARS OLD. NOR,
[01:46:01] THERE ARE ANY
[01:46:06] ADDICTION PROGRAMS SPECIFICALLY GEARED
[01:46:07] TOWARDS TEENS AND
[01:46:10] NICOTINE USE THOUGH THE ESCALATING
[01:46:11] POPULARITY AMONG TEENS WAS
[01:46:16] PREDICTED AS A DEVELOPMENT. JEWEL IS THE
[01:46:17] INDUSTRY LEADER, A
[01:46:21] MULTIBILLION DOLLAR COMPANY NOW OWNED 35
Page 5 of 94
[01:46:22] PERCENT BY THE MAKERS
[01:46:26] OF MARLBORO CIGARETTES AND CONTROLS MORE
[01:46:27] THEN 70 PERCENT OF
[01:46:33] THE MARKET SHARE. IT'S MAIN PRODUCT FITS
[01:46:34] IN THE HAND AND
[01:46:36] RESEMBLE A U SB DRIVE SO IT IS EASY TO
[01:46:37] CONCEAL AND USE IN
[01:46:44] SCHOOL AND IT IS SAID TO SOMETIMES BE
[01:46:45] USED EVEN IN THE MIDDLE
[01:46:47] OF CLASSES. THIS DEVICE ALSO PRODUCES
[01:46:48] LESS SMOKE THEN MANY
[01:46:52] OTHER OF THE E CIGARETTE BRANDS. ABOUT
[01:46:53] 200 PUFFS OF A JOULE
[01:46:58] POD FROM A POD SYSTEM SIMILAR TO POD
[01:46:59] SYSTEMS USED IN COFFEE
[01:47:03] MAKERS CAN CONTAIN AS MUCH NICOTINE AS A
[01:47:04] PACK OF CIGARETTES.
[01:47:07] ONE FULL POD IS EQUAL TO A 20 CIGARETTE
[01:47:08] PACK. THIS IS JOULE,
[01:47:14] THIS IS THE MAIN SUPPLIER OF THIS
[01:47:15] PRODUCT BASICALLY DELIVERS
[01:47:19] THE MOST NICOTINE. BEYOND THE CHEMISTRY
[01:47:20] OF THE NICOTINE
[01:47:27] ITSELF, E CIGARETTE COMPANIES HAVE COME
[01:47:28] UNDER FIRE WITH SWEET
[01:47:33] FLAVORS TO THE E LIQUIDS KNOWN TO APPEAL
[01:47:34] TO YOUNG PEOPLE.
[01:47:37] THEY SAY THE COMPANIES SAY THEY ARE
[01:47:38] DESIGNED FOR ADULTS
[01:47:42] QUITTING SMOKING, BUT WITH NAMES LIKE
[01:47:43] BAZOOKA VAMP, CANDY
[01:47:49] CANE, CHARLEY [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] RIP
[01:47:50] OFFS YOU HAVE TO WONDER
[01:47:52] WHO IS MOST LIKELY TO FIND THESE
[01:47:53] PRODUCTS ATTRACTIVE. THERE
[01:47:56] ARE NOW WELL OVER 15 ,000 UNIQUE FLAVORS
[01:47:57] AVAILABLE. AT
[01:48:04] PRESENT, THE CLINICAL COMMUNITY IS NOT
[01:48:05] CERTAIN HOW TO TREAT
[01:48:08] PEOPLE OF ANY AGE WHO ARE ADDICTED TO
[01:48:09] vaping. WHEN IT COMES
[01:48:13] TO SUPPORT FOR PARENTS AND KIDS
[01:48:14] RESOURCES ARE IT SCARCE. AS
[01:48:18] YOU MAY KNOW, A STUDY SESSION IS PLANNED
[01:48:19] WITH OUR CITY COUNCIL
[01:48:22] AND BEACH CITY HEALTH DISTRICT HOW TO
[01:48:23] WORK TOGETHER TO ADDRESS
Page 6 of 94
[01:48:26] THIS EPIDEMIC. AT PRESENT FOR
[01:48:27] INFORMATION ON WHAT YOU CAN DO
[01:48:32] AS A APPARENT OR CONCERNED NEIGHBOR OR
[01:48:33] WHO EVER MIGHT KNOW OF
[01:48:36] A CHILD WHO IS SUFFERING RIGHT NOW YOU
[01:48:37] SHOULD CONTACT THE
[01:48:40] PARENTS AGAINST vaping E CIGARETTES AND
[01:48:41] THAT IS THE NAME OF
[01:48:46] THE WEBSITE SO
[01:48:47] PARENTSAGAINSTvapingCIGARETTES.ORG. IT IS
[01:48:54] CLEAR WE KNOW THIS IS GOING ON IN THE
[01:48:55] BATHROOMS OF HIGH
[01:48:58] SCHOOLS AROUND SOUTH BAY TODAY, AND IS
[01:48:59] AN ISSUE THAT WE
[01:49:02] HAVEN'T BEGUN TO ADDRESS. I CAN'T
[01:49:03] EXPRESS TO YOU HOW
[01:49:06] IMPORTANT IT IS THAT WE TAKE STEPS ON A
[01:49:07] LOCAL LEVEL TO ADDRESS
[01:49:10] THIS PROBLEM BECAUSE IT MAY BE YEARS
[01:49:11] BEFORE THE FEDERAL
[01:49:14] GOVERNMENT REALLY DOES WHAT THEY NEED TO
[01:49:15] DO IN TERMS OF
[01:49:18] ADDRESSING IT. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR.
[01:49:20] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY OTHER
[01:49:21] ANNOUNCEMENTS? I HAVE ONE
[01:49:24] ANNOUNCEMENT OUR LAST REMINDER OF THE
[01:49:25] SECOND ANNUAL COMMUNITY
[01:49:28] WIDE GARAGE SALE. THE CITY OF HERMOSA
[01:49:29] BEACH WILL HOST THIS
[01:49:33] SATURDAY MARCH 30, 7 A.M. TO NOON WITH
[01:49:34] DOZENS OF GARAGE SALES
[01:49:38] THROUGHOUT HERMOSA BEACH. A MAP OF
[01:49:39] GARAGE SALE LOCATIONS WILL
[01:49:42] BE POSTED ON THE CITY WEBSITE,
[01:49:43] HERMOSABCH.ORG/COMMUNITY GARAGE
[01:49:50] SALE. WE ARE ON TO APPROVAL OF THE
[01:49:51] AGENDA. DO MY COLLEAGUES
[01:49:55] WANT TO TAKE A QUICK LOOK AND SEE IF
[01:49:56] THEY WANT TO APPROVE OR
[01:49:58] MAKE CHANGES? HAVE A MOTION?
[01:50:02] >> MADAM MAYOR I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE
[01:50:03] THE AGENDA OF TONIGHT'S
[01:50:07] MEETING.
[01:50:08] >> I SECOND.
[01:50:09] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[01:50:10] >> AYE.
[01:50:11] >> ALRIGHT. NEXT UP MADAM CLERK
Page 7 of 94
[01:50:12] PROCLAMATIONS.
[01:50:17] >> FIRST IS RECOGNIZING EARTH HOUR ON
[01:50:18] MARCH 30, 2019 FROM 8
[01:50:22] P.M. TO 9:30 P.M. AND EARTH DAY APRIL
[01:50:23] 22, 2019.
[01:50:28] >> ALRIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I HAVE
[01:50:29] A PROCLAMATION I
[01:50:31] WILL READ. WHEREAS, EARTH HOUR ORGANIZED
[01:50:32] BY THE WORLD
[01:50:35] WILDLIFE FUND IS A INITIATIVE THAT
[01:50:36] ENCOURAGE INDIVIDUALS
[01:50:38] BUSINESSES AND GOVERNMENTS AROUND THE
[01:50:39] WORLD TO TURN OFF ALL
[01:50:42] NON ESSENTIAL LIGHTS FOR ONE HOUR THIS
[01:50:43] SATURDAY MARCH 30
[01:50:46] BETWEEN 8:30 AND 9:30 P.M. THE GOAL IS
[01:50:47] DEMONSTRATE INDIVIDUAL
[01:50:54] ACTION ON A MASS SCALE CAN HELP
[01:50:55] POSITIVELY IMPACT THE PLANET,
[01:50:58] AND CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN CALIFORNIA
[01:50:59] ARE EXPECTED TO
[01:51:00] INCREASE THE SEVERITY OF WILDFIRES AND
[01:51:01] STORMS THREATENING
[01:51:05] HOMES BUSINESS AND UTILITIES AND
[01:51:06] DISRUPTING ROADWAYS, WHEREAS,
[01:51:09] LED BY THE WORLD WILDLIFE FUNDS HUNDREDS
[01:51:10] OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE
[01:51:14] ACROSS 180 COUNTRIES CELEBRATED EARTH
[01:51:15] HOUR IN 2018 WITH LIGHTS
[01:51:20] GOING OUT. SYDNEY OPERA HOUSE, BIG BEN
[01:51:21] AND HOUSE OF
[01:51:26] PARLIAMENT, TOKYO TOWER, EMPIRE STATE
[01:51:27] BUILDING, MARINA SANDS
[01:51:31] HOTEL IN SINGAPORE AND EIFFEL TOWER
[01:51:32] STOOD IN DARKNESS AS A
[01:51:39] LAND MARK ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. WHEREAS,
[01:51:40] THE CITY OF HERMOSA
[01:51:43] BEACH AND THE CITY COUNCIL WILL TURN OFF
[01:51:44] LIGHTS ON THE HER
[01:51:49] MOSEY BEACH HOUR. I HEREBY PROCLAIM THE
[01:51:50] HOUR BETWEEN 8:30 AND
[01:51:58] 9:30 P.M. THIS SATURDAY TO BE EARTH HOUR
[01:51:59] AND ENCOURAGE
[01:52:04] RESIDENT TO MAKE A STATEMENT OF CONCERN
[01:52:05] ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE
[01:52:06] AND DEMONSTRATE THE COMMITMENT TO
[01:52:07] FINDING SOLUTIONS BY TURNING
Page 8 of 94
[01:52:09] OFF ALL NON ESSENTIAL LIGHTS DURING THIS
[01:52:10] TIME PERIOD. MADAM
[01:52:13] CLERK.
[01:52:14] >> THANK YOU MADAM MAY. PROCLAMATION
[01:52:15] DECLARING APRIL AS
[01:52:23] DONATE LIFE MONTH.
[01:52:25] >> ALRIGHT. ARE TAMMY AND HOLLY
[01:52:26] HERE-PLEASE STEP TO THE
[01:52:30] PODIUM. DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT DONATE
[01:52:31] LIFE MONTH AND MAYBE
[01:52:41] YOUR STORY AND I'LL COME DOWN. I HAVE A
[01:52:42] PROCLAMATION.
[01:52:44] >> SURE. EACH APRIL IT'S NATIONAL DONATE
[01:52:45] LIFE MONTH
[01:52:52] RECOGNIZING ORGAN AND TISSUE DONATION
[01:52:53] AND THE IMPORTANCE
[01:52:56] THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES AND WORLD.
[01:52:57] HERE IN THE UNITED
[01:52:59] STATES THERE IS A 113 THOUSAND PEOPLE AT
[01:53:00] ANY ONE TIME ON THE
[01:53:03] ORGAN TRANSPLANT WAITING LIST AND 20
[01:53:04] PEOPLE DIE A DAY WAITING
[01:53:08] FOR ORGANS. LAST YEAR THERE WAS 36.500
[01:53:09] TRANSPLANTS BUT WE
[01:53:20] HAVE MORE THEN A HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE
[01:53:21] ON THE WAITING LIST
[01:53:25] SO THERE IS A URGENT NEED FOR PEOPLE TO
[01:53:26] SAY YES TO ORGAN
[01:53:29] DONATION AND EDUCATE THEMSELVES. HERE IN
[01:53:30] CALIFORNIA OR IN THE
[01:53:33] SOCAL AREA, THE LAST SATURDAY OF APRIL
[01:53:34] IS THE DONATE LIFE FUND
[01:53:39] WALK WHICH BRINGS ORGAN DONOR FAMILIES
[01:53:40] RECIPIENT LIKE HOLLY
[01:53:43] AND MYSELF AND PEOPLE WHO ARE REGISTERED
[01:53:44] AND JUST SUPPORT
[01:53:46] ORGAN DONATION TOGETHER AT THE DONATE
[01:53:47] LIFE RUN WALK AT CAL
[01:53:51] STATE FULLERTON. IT IS A OPPORTUNITY FOR
[01:53:52] PEOPLE TO SEE THAT
[01:53:54] THROUGH TRAGEDY WHEN PEOPLE DO-PASS AWAY
[01:53:55] AND THE ORGANS ARE
[01:54:01] DONATED THROUGH TRAGEDY LIFE COULD BE
[01:54:02] GIVEN TO PEOPLE AND THEY
[01:54:05] CELEBRATE THE LEGACY OF THE LOVED ONES
[01:54:06] LIFE THROUGH THE ORGANS
[01:54:09] DONATED KNOWING SOMEBODY'S LIFE WAS
Page 9 of 94
[01:54:10] SAVED. HOLLY AND I WERE
[01:54:14] RECIPIENT OF LIVING ORGAN DONATION SO
[01:54:15] STORY IS DIFFERENT. MY
[01:54:18] SISTER DONATED HER KIDNEY TO ME IN 1986
[01:54:19] SO THIS YEAR IT WILL
[01:54:23] BE 33 YEARS I WILL BE CELEBRATING MY
[01:54:24] ORGAN TRANSPLANT AND SO
[01:54:30] FORTUNATE BECAUSE THERE ARE SO MANY
[01:54:31] STILL WAITING FOR THE CALL
[01:54:32] FOR THE PERSON. THROUGH THE EFFORTS OF
[01:54:33] THE DMV, THEY
[01:54:39] PARTNERING WITH DONATE LIFE MORE THEN 95
[01:54:40] PERCENT OF ORGAN
[01:54:43] REGISTRATION IN CALIFORNIA ARE BECAUSE
[01:54:44] OF THE PARTNERSHIP WITH
[01:54:46] THE DMV SO THEY PLAY A VITAL ROLE AND
[01:54:47] WHY IT IS DMV DONATE
[01:54:51] LIFE IN CALIFORNIA. LET ME JUST LOOK
[01:54:52] DOWN HERE FOR A MOMENT-I
[01:54:57] GOT A COUPLE OTHER THINGS TO SHARE WITH
[01:54:58] YOU.
[01:54:59] >> SURE.
[01:55:00] >> I ALSO WANTED-I MENTIONED HOLLY AND I
[01:55:01] ARE RECIPIENT OF
[01:55:07] LIVING DONATION SO I WANTED TO SHARE
[01:55:08] THAT IN 2018 THERE WERE A
[01:55:11] LITTLE MORE IN THE 6400 LIVING ORGAN
[01:55:12] KIDNEY TRANSPLANTS.
[01:55:22] THERE IS A GREAT NEED WHEN YOU HAVE THAT
[01:55:23] MANY PEOPLE WHO ARE
[01:55:25] SAYING YES TO LIVING ORGAN DONATION YET
[01:55:26] WE HAVE THIS
[01:55:29] TREMENDOUS NUMBER ON THE WAITING LIST. I
[01:55:30] MENTIONED THE
[01:55:34] RUN/WALK. HOLLY HAS A TEAM, IT IS TEAM
[01:55:35] SKETCHERS SO IF-WEPT
[01:55:41] TO INVITE THE COMMUNITY TO COME OUT AND
[01:55:42] HER TEAM IS TEAM
[01:55:46] SKETCHER WHEN YOU GO TO
[01:55:47] DONATELIFERUNWALK.ORG YOU CAN CLICK
[01:55:58] OWN HER TEAM AND BE A PART THE TEAM AND
[01:55:59] WANT TO ENCOURAGE
[01:56:01] EVERYBODY TO HAVE A CONVERSATION. IT
[01:56:02] PROBABLY ISN'T A EASY
[01:56:04] CONVERSATION TO HAVE BUT IT IS NECESSARY
[01:56:05] BECAUSE IF THE
[01:56:08] CIRCUMSTANCES COME UP WHERE SOMEBODY
Page 10 of 94
[01:56:09] MIGHT BE IN THE POSITION
[01:56:11] TO BE A ORGAN DONOR WE HOPE PEOPLE WOULD
[01:56:12] HAVE HAD THE
[01:56:15] CONVERSATION. THEY CAN HAVE THE
[01:56:16] CONVERSATION AND LEARN MORE
[01:56:17] ABOUT ORGAN DONATION BY GOING TO
[01:56:18] DONATELIFECALIFORNIA.ORG OR
[01:56:22] DONEVIDACALIFORNIA.ORG. HOLLY.
[01:56:26] >> I'LL TELL YOU BUT MYSELF AND STORY, I
[01:56:27] RECEIVED A KIDNEY
[01:56:31] TRANSPLANT THIS PAST MARCH 6 WAS MY 19TH
[01:56:32] YEAR. I RECEIVED A
[01:56:36] KIDNEY FROM MY COUSIN AND AS TAMMY SAID,
[01:56:37] HAVING THAT
[01:56:40] CONVERSATION WITH YOUR FAMILY IS ALWAYS
[01:56:41] TOUGH. WHO WANTS TO
[01:56:43] TALK ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU PASSED
[01:56:44] AWAY? FOR THAT REASON
[01:56:47] I DIDN'T-MY WHOLE FAMILY-WE KEPT IT
[01:56:48] QUITE AND DIDN'T TELL
[01:56:52] ANYBODY I WAS SICK. [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS]
[01:56:53] FANGARY WAS MY
[01:56:57] FORMER BOSS AND WENT THROUGH IT WITH ME
[01:56:58] AND HE WATCHED ME
[01:57:04] DETERIORATE FROM 195 POUNDS TO 122
[01:57:05] POUNDS. WE DIDN'T TELL ME
[01:57:11] FAMILY OR ANYBODY UNTIL IT WAS APPARENT
[01:57:12] I WAS IN NEED OF A
[01:57:15] KIDNEY. I WAS LIVING ON DIALYSIS AND IT
[01:57:16] IS TOUCH SITUATION
[01:57:22] BUT AS TAMMY SAID I WAS LUCKY MY COUSIN
[01:57:23] STEPPED UP, SHE WAS A
[01:57:27] MARCH MATCH.
[01:57:29] >> THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. TJ IF WE
[01:57:30] HAVE A MICROPHONE I
[01:57:32] WILL WALK DOWN AND PRESENT WITH THE
[01:57:33] PROCLAMATION BUT THINK IT
[01:57:36] IS IMPORTANT YOU ARE HERE TO TELL YOUR
[01:57:37] STORY AND REMIND HOW
[01:57:40] IMPORTANT IT IS TO REGISTER AND KNOW
[01:57:41] ABOUT LIVING DONORS AS
[01:57:43] WELL SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[01:57:45] (APPLAUSE)
[01:57:52] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'M GOING TO
[01:57:53] PRESENT WITH THE
[01:57:58] PROCLAMATION. WHEREAS, ORGAN TISSUE
[01:57:59] MARROW AND BLOOD DONATION
Page 11 of 94
[01:58:01] ARE LIE GIVING ACTS RECOGNIZED WORLD
[01:58:02] WIDE AS EXPRESSION OF
[01:58:09] COMPASSION IN NEED. 113 THOUSAND
[01:58:10] INDIVIDUALS AND 21 THOUSAND
[01:58:12] IN CALIFORNIA ARE ON THE NATIONAL ORGAN
[01:58:13] TRANSPLANT WAITING
[01:58:16] LIST AND ON AVERAGE 20 PEOPLE A DAY DIE
[01:58:17] WAITING FOR THE SHORT
[01:58:19] AGE OF DONATED ORGANS, WHEREAS, MORE
[01:58:20] THEN 600 THOUSAND UNITS
[01:58:23] OF BLOOD PER YEAR ARE NEEDED TO MEET THE
[01:58:24] NEED IN CALIFORNIA
[01:58:29] AND A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL DONATION OF
[01:58:30] HEART, LIVER, LUNGS,
[01:58:32] KIDNEY PANCREAS AND SMALL INTESTINE CAN
[01:58:33] SAVE 8 LIVES DONATION
[01:58:38] OF TISSUE CAN SAVE AND HEEL THE LIVES OF
[01:58:39] 75 OTHERS AND SINGLE
[01:58:43] DONATION CAN HELP THREE PEOPLE IN NEED
[01:58:44] AND WHEREAS, THE SPIRIT
[01:58:45] OF GIVING AND DECISION TO DONATE ARE NOT
[01:58:46] RESTRICTED BY AGE AND
[01:58:51] MEDICAL CONDITION AND CALIFORNIA
[01:58:52] RESIDENTS CAN SIGN UP WITH
[01:58:53] DONATE LIFE CALIFORNIA DONOR REGISTRY
[01:58:54] APPLYING OR RENEWING THE
[01:59:00] DRIVERS LICENSE AND BE RESOLVED IN
[01:59:01] RECOGNITION OF NATIONAL
[01:59:06] DONATE LIFE MONTH APRIL 2019 IS HEREBY
[01:59:07] PROCLAIMED DONATE LIFE
[01:59:11] CALIFORNIA MONTH IN HERMOSA BEACH AND IN
[01:59:12] DOING SO WE ENCOURAGE
[01:59:14] ALL CALIFORNIANS TO SIGN UP WITH THE
[01:59:15] DONATE LIFE REGISTRY AT
[01:59:20] DONATELIFECALIFORNIA.ORG OR [INAUDIBLE
[01:59:21] COMMENTS] THANK YOU
[01:59:26] BOTH SO MUCH. IF I CAN INVITE MY
[01:59:27] COLLEAGUES TO COME DOWN FOR
[01:59:31] A PICTURE IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND. THANK
[01:59:32] YOU.
[02:00:50] >> EVERYONE KNOWS TO REGISTER TO DONATE.
[02:00:51] I THINK WE ARE ONTO
[02:00:56] MADAM CITY MANAGER, DO YOU HAVE UPDATES?
[02:00:57] NO, OKAY. I THINK
[02:01:00] MADAM CLERK WE CAN MOVE ON TO PUBLIC
[02:01:01] PARTICIPATION.
[02:01:08] >> THANK YOU. THE CITY COUNCIL VALUES
Page 12 of 94
[02:01:09] YOUR COMMENTS THE BROWN
[02:01:12] ACT PROHIBITS THE COUNCIL TAKING ACTION
[02:01:13] ON A MATTER NOT LIST
[02:01:15] SAID ON THE POSTED AGENDA AS A BUSINESS
[02:01:16] ITEM. WE HAVE ONE
[02:01:19] WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, LETTER FROM
[02:01:20] HOWARD LONGACRE. THIS IS
[02:01:25] THE TIME FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
[02:01:26] ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON
[02:01:29] ANY ITEMS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION NOT ON
[02:01:30] THE AGENDA ON ITEMS
[02:01:33] TO WHICH PUBLIC COMMENT WILL NOT BE
[02:01:34] TAKEN SUCH AS
[02:01:42] MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC COMMENTS
[02:01:43] CALLED MISCELLANEOUS
[02:01:45] REPORTS AND OTHER MATTERS ARE ONLY HEARD
[02:01:46] AT THIS TIME.
[02:01:48] COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ARE ONLY
[02:01:49] HEARD IN PUBLIC HEARING.
[02:01:54] MEMBERS MAY SPEAK ON ITEMS REMOVED FROM
[02:01:55] CUB SENT OF ITEMS
[02:02:01] APPEARING UNDER MUNICIPAL MATTERS.
[02:02:02] COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO 3
[02:02:08] MINUTES. ANY OTHER MATTER WITHIN THE
[02:02:09] JURISDICTION IS ASKED TO
[02:02:12] FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD. THE PURPOSE OF
[02:02:13] THE CARD IS TO
[02:02:16] STREAMLINE AND BETTER ORGANIZE OUR
[02:02:17] PUBLIC COMMENT PROCESS TO
[02:02:19] INSURE SPEAKERS NAMES ARE PROVIDED IN
[02:02:20] THE MINUTES AND WHERE
[02:02:23] APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE CONTACT
[02:02:24] INFORMATION FOR STAFF
[02:02:26] FOLLOW-UP. THERE ARE CARDS IN THE OVER
[02:02:27] BY THE CAMERA OPERATOR
[02:02:32] ROOM THERE ON THAT TABLE AND IF YOU DO
[02:02:33] NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT
[02:02:36] WOULD LIKE THE RECORD TO REFLECT YOUR
[02:02:37] OPINION, PLEASE FILL OUT
[02:02:40] A CARD AS WITH EL. THANK YOU.
[02:02:42] >> I WANTED TO TAKE A MOMENT TO REMIND
[02:02:43] EVERYONE ABOUT OUR
[02:02:45] PUBLIC COMMENT AND BASIC DE QUORUM. WE
[02:02:46] NEED TO MAKE SURE WE
[02:02:53] OFFER CIVILITY AND RESPECT TO EVERYONE
[02:02:54] IN THE ROOM. WE WILL
[02:02:58] NOT TOLERATE DEMONSTRATIONS, CHEERING,
Page 13 of 94
[02:02:59] YELLING, WHISTLING,
[02:03:03] HAND CLAPPING OR ANY KIND OF DISRUPTION
[02:03:04] OR ANYTHING THAT
[02:03:08] DISTURBS THE REGULAR ORDERLY CONDUCT OF
[02:03:09] OUR CITY COUNCIL
[02:03:12] MEETING. HOWEVER, OUR FORMER MAYOR AND
[02:03:13] COUNCIL MEMBER DUCLOS
[02:03:19] DID OFFER SOMETHING AT ONE OF THE LAST
[02:03:20] MEETINGS WHERE WE
[02:03:23] DISCUSSED THE INFILTRATION PROJECT AND
[02:03:24] AS SOMEONE IN YOUR
[02:03:27] CHAIR FOR MANY YEARS, I UNDERSTAND THE
[02:03:28] NEED AND WANT TO
[02:03:32] SUPPORT THOSE THAT HAVE LIKE-MINDED
[02:03:33] IDEAS AND POSITIONS, AND I
[02:03:37] THINK IT WAS VERY EFFECTIVE IF YOU
[02:03:38] AGREE-YOU CAN USE YOUR
[02:03:43] FINGERS JUST LIKE THAT AND IT ISN'T
[02:03:44] DISRUPTIVE AND SUPPORTIVE
[02:03:48] AND THOUGHT THAT WAS A GREAT USE-
[02:03:49] >> THINK JAZZ HANDS.
[02:03:52] >> THINK JAZZ HANDS, YEAH. WE ALSO ASK
[02:03:53] YOU RESPECT THE RIGHTS
[02:03:58] OF OTHERS AND ALLOW EVERYONE TO EXPRESS
[02:03:59] THEIR OPINION WITHOUT
[02:04:02] NOISE AND DISTURBANCE AND PLEASE TAKE
[02:04:03] SIDE CONVERSATIONS INTO
[02:04:05] THE COURT YARD. WE ALSO PLEASE ASK YOUR
[02:04:06] COMMENTS ARE FOCUSED
[02:04:10] ON THE ISSUE PRESENTED AND PLEASE AVOID
[02:04:11] PERSONAL ATTACKS AS
[02:04:13] MUCH AS YOU WANT TO TOWARDS COUNCIL,
[02:04:14] STAFF, AND ANYONE ELSE IN
[02:04:18] THE AUDIENCE. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK
[02:04:19] DURING PUBLIC
[02:04:22] COMMENT, WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER, THERE
[02:04:23] IS THE COMMENT CARDS
[02:04:26] IN THE BACK OF THE ROOM AT THE BLACK
[02:04:27] TABLE. PLEASE FILL OUT A
[02:04:30] CARD. EACH SPEAKER-THERE IS A LOT OF
[02:04:31] PEOPLE AND WE COULD HAVE
[02:04:34] WHITTLED IT DOWN TO TWO MINUTES BUT
[02:04:35] WE'LL GIVE EVERYONE THE
[02:04:37] THREE MINUTES TO TALK TONIGHT. WE WILL
[02:04:38] NOT ALLOW YOU TO
[02:04:41] TRANSFER YOUR TIME TO SOMEONE ELSE, SO
[02:04:42] WHEN YOU ARE AT THE
Page 14 of 94
[02:04:45] PODIUM IT IS YOU SPEAKING, NOT HAVING
[02:04:46] SOMEONE ELSE SPEAK FOR
[02:04:48] YOU. WHEN YOU SPEAK IF YOU DON'T MIND
[02:04:49] PLEASE STATING YOUR
[02:04:52] NAME SO WE CAN GET THE MINUTES CORRECT.
[02:04:53] AND SIMPLE REMINDER
[02:04:57] THAT IT CAN SEEM FRUSTRATING BUT PUBLIC
[02:04:58] COMMENT ISN'T A
[02:05:02] OPPORTUNITY FOR A TWO WAY DIALOGUE
[02:05:03] BETWEEN THE SPEAKER AND
[02:05:05] COUNCIL AND STAFF. WE DO TAKE NOTES UP
[02:05:06] HERE ON ALL PUBLIC
[02:05:10] COMMENTS AND WE WILL ADDRESS THOSE
[02:05:11] QUESTIONS WITH STAFF ONCE
[02:05:14] ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED,
[02:05:15] AND FAILURE TO ADHERE
[02:05:23] TO THE PROCEDURE WILL RESULT IN REQUEST
[02:05:24] TO KINDLY LEAVE
[02:05:27] COUNCIL CHAMBERS BUT DON'T ANTICIPATE
[02:05:28] THAT HAPPENING. I ALSO
[02:05:30] REMIND YOU THAT THIS PERIOD RIGHT NOW IS
[02:05:31] PUBLIC COMMENT REALLY
[02:05:34] FOR ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA. WE
[02:05:35] WORKED REALLY HARD TO MAKE
[02:05:37] SURE THIS AGENDA CONSISTED SOLELY FOR
[02:05:38] THE PURPOSE OF
[02:05:43] DISCUSSING THE INFILTRATION PROJECT AS
[02:05:44] THE PUBLIC HEARING SO
[02:05:47] NOW IF YOU ARE IN THE AUDIENCE AND HAVE
[02:05:48] SOMETHING TO TALK
[02:05:50] ABOUT THAT'S NOT ON THE AGENDA WE INVITE
[02:05:51] YOU FORWARD TO SPEAK.
[02:05:55] I'LL GO THROUGH THE SPEAKER CARDS TO
[02:05:56] SEE-MADAM CLERK, DO YOU
[02:05:59] HAVE ANY CARDS FOR SOMETHING THAT IS NOT
[02:06:00] ON THE AGENDA?
[02:06:05] >> YES, I DO, MADAM MAYOR. I HAVE-WE
[02:06:06] HAVE A FEW PEOPLE WHO
[02:06:11] LIKE TO SPEAK DURING PUBLIC
[02:06:12] PARTICIPATION ABOUT THE GREEN BELT
[02:06:14] PROJECT NOW.
[02:06:15] >> OKAY.
[02:06:16] >> BUT, WE HAVE 6 PEOPLE I CAN CALL THEM
[02:06:17] ALL FORWARD IF YOU
[02:06:23] LIKE OR AT LEAST LET THEM KNOW THE
[02:06:24] ORDER.
[02:06:28] >> CALL 3 AT A TIME.
Page 15 of 94
[02:06:30] >> FIRST IS JUDITH MANGO, TRENT LARSSON
[02:06:31] AND HEIDI SWAN.
[02:06:35] >> ALRIGHT. JUDITH.
[02:06:38] >> GOOD EVENING EVERYONE. JUDY MANGO.
[02:06:39] 501 [INAUDIBLE
[02:06:44] COMMENTS] SORRY I CANNOT STAY LONGER
[02:06:45] TONIGHT AND CHOOSING TO
[02:06:47] SPEAK NOW. OVER THE LAST 6 MONTHS WE HAD
[02:06:48] APPROXIMATELY 20
[02:06:54] DAYS OF RAINFALL. IF THIS INFILTRATION
[02:06:55] PROJECT HAD GONE
[02:07:00] FORWARD, WE WOULD HAVE HAD 48 MILLION
[02:07:01] GALLONS OF WATER
[02:07:06] INJECTED INTO THE SOIL THAT IS BASED ON
[02:07:07] 2.4 MILLION GALLONS
[02:07:11] PER STORM SURGE. THAT WOULD HAVE INJECT
[02:07:12] TODAY THE SOIL OF THE
[02:07:18] GREEN BELT OVER THAT SHORT PERIOD OF
[02:07:19] TIME. WHICH IS A
[02:07:22] RELATIVELY SMALL AREA ABOUT 100 FEET BY
[02:07:23] 420 FEET LONG. IT IS
[02:07:27] JUST INCONCEIVABLE THAT THERE WOULD NOT
[02:07:28] BE SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE
[02:07:32] TO THE HOMES THAT SIT DIRECTLY IN FRONT
[02:07:33] OF THE AREA THAT IS
[02:07:38] DESIGNATED FOR THE INFILTRATION PROJECT.
[02:07:39] THIS IS JUST A RISK
[02:07:43] THAT NONE OF US WANT TO TAKE. THE GREEN
[02:07:44] BELT AND FOR THAT
[02:07:50] MATTER SOUTH PARK ARE JUST NOT VIABLE
[02:07:51] SITES FOR THIS PROJECT,
[02:07:56] A PROJECT OF THIS MAGNITUDE. THEREFORE,
[02:07:57] I IMPLORE YOU TO VOTE
[02:08:02] TO DISSOLVE THE MOU. RETURN THE GRANT
[02:08:03] MONEY. AND LET EACH
[02:08:09] CITY DEAL WITH THEIR PROPORTIONATE SHARE
[02:08:10] OF THE RUN-OFF.
[02:08:14] THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.
[02:08:17] >> THANK YOU. THANK YOU TO OUR AUDIENCE
[02:08:18] MEMBERS. TRENT.
[02:08:26] >> HELLO. TRENT LARSSON. I LIKE TO TALK
[02:08:27] TO YOU TONIGHT ABOUT
[02:08:30] THE INFILTRATION PROJECT AND ACTUALLY
[02:08:31] INTO A BIGGER PICTURE
[02:08:34] ABOUT IT. BECAUSE I THINK WHAT WE HAVE
[02:08:35] REALLY IS A
[02:08:36] OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE THIS THING A WIN,
Page 16 of 94
[02:08:37] WIN FOR EVERYBODY. BUT
[02:08:40] AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE IS A LOT OF
[02:08:41] OPPOSITION TO THIS IN
[02:08:43] PUTTING THIS INTO OUR SMALL PUBLIC
[02:08:44] SPACES. THERE REALLY IS.
[02:08:48] THERE IS A LOT OF CONCERN AND RIGHTLY
[02:08:49] SO. I'M A BELIEVER IN
[02:08:54] THE COUNTRY WE CAN BUILD THINGS BUT
[02:08:55] SOMETIMES WE SHOULDN'T DO
[02:09:00] IT AND LOOK FOR ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY AND
[02:09:01] WE HAVE A GREAT
[02:09:03] OPPORTUNITY HERE. WE HAVE THE AES SITE
[02:09:04] 51 ACRES WHICH ISN'T
[02:09:07] THE SAME FOREVER AND IT NEEDS A TON OF
[02:09:08] PUBLIC MONEY. IT NEEDS
[02:09:12] MONEY FROM REDONDO AND THE STATE OF
[02:09:13] CALIFORNIA AND THE FEDERAL
[02:09:17] GOVERNMENT TO MAKE THIS WORK. THAT WHOLE
[02:09:18] AREA AND INCLUDING
[02:09:21] THE REDONDO PIER NEEDS A LOT OF
[02:09:22] INVESTMENT SO THIS
[02:09:26] INFILTRATION PROJECT COULD BE A GREAT
[02:09:27] KICK-STARTER FOR THAT
[02:09:30] PROPERTY. IT COULD BE THE FIRST THING
[02:09:31] THAT GOES IN AND OTHER
[02:09:34] THINGS CAN BE BUILT AROUND IT. YOU DON'T
[02:09:35] BUILD A WHOLE
[02:09:37] PROJECT WITHOUT STARTING ON SOMETHING
[02:09:38] FIRST AND WE CAN FUNNEL
[02:09:40] THE PUBLIC FUNDS INTO THAT PROPERTY AND
[02:09:41] I KNOW THAT THE
[02:09:44] COUNCIL-EVERYBODY WANTS A CLEAN OCEAN,
[02:09:45] THERE ISN'T ONE PERSON
[02:09:50] THAT DOESN'T WANT THE OCEAN CLEANER SO
[02:09:51] YOU WILL NOT GET
[02:09:55] PUSH-BACK FROM THE POPULOUS BUT YOU HAVE
[02:09:56] TO GET PUSH BACK FROM
[02:10:07] REDONDO BEACH. IT ONLY REQUIRES YOUR
[02:10:08] VOTE SO WHAT I ASK YOU
[02:10:10] AS A COUNCIL TO LISTEN TO ALL OF THE
[02:10:11] PEOPLE HERE AND MAKE A
[02:10:14] VOTE THAT SAYS WE ARE GOING TO PUT THIS
[02:10:15] OFF AND MAKE IT
[02:10:18] BETTER, AND WE NEED TO GET [INAUDIBLE
[02:10:19] COMMENTS] WE NEED TED
[02:10:24] LOU FOR FEDERAL FUNDS. WE NEED SENATOR
[02:10:25] BEN ALLEN BECAUSE WE
Page 17 of 94
[02:10:31] ARE CAUGHT IN THE PICKLE BECAUSE THIS
[02:10:32] PROJECT SOUNDED GOOD AND
[02:10:35] WE GOT OUT OVER OUR SKIS AND NOW IN A
[02:10:36] PICKLE WHERE WE ARE PUT
[02:10:39] UPON BY A AGENCY THAT IS THREATENING US
[02:10:40] AND I DON'T LIKE THAT.
[02:10:43] NOT ONE BIT. I THINK THEY NEED TO COME
[02:10:44] DOWN HERE AND SEE THIS
[02:10:47] IF THAT IS WHAT THEY DO SO WE CAN DO
[02:10:48] SMALLER PROJECTS AND RUN
[02:10:50] THE STORM DRAINS OFF THE HILL TO THE
[02:10:51] GREEN BELT AND SMALL
[02:10:55] PIPES LIKE MANHATTAN BEACH WE CAN FIX
[02:10:56] STUFF ON THE BEACH AND
[02:11:00] TAKE CARE OF ALL THE GOOD FAITH GOOD
[02:11:01] WILL BUT SHOULD TRY TO
[02:11:05] PUNT THIS TO THE AES SITE AND DO IT
[02:11:06] THERE. THANK YOU VERY
[02:11:09] MUCH. THANK YOU.
[02:11:16] >> HELLO. MY NAME IS HEIDI SWAN AND MET
[02:11:17] JEFF DUCLOS LAST WEEK
[02:11:24] AT A VAPOR EVENT AND SUGGESTED I COME
[02:11:25] HERE TO ASK FOR YOUR
[02:11:28] SUPPORT. FOR THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW 420 IS
[02:11:29] THE TIME OF DAY
[02:11:33] MARIJUANA ENTHUSIAST LIKE TO GO OUT AND
[02:11:34] GET HIGH. THAT THEN
[02:11:39] HAS MADE APRIL 20, 4-20 AN UNOFFICIAL
[02:11:40] HOLIDAY FOR THE POT
[02:11:48] ENTHUSIASTS. LAST YEAR IN 2018 THE
[02:11:49] JOURNAL OF AMERICAN
[02:11:54] MEDICINE PUBLISHED A STUDY WHICH SHOWED
[02:11:55] ON APRIL 20 NATIONWIDE
[02:12:01] TRAFFIC FATALITIES ROSE BY 12 PERCENT.
[02:12:02] THIS IS A DEVASTATING
[02:12:10] NUMBER AND COMPARABLE TO THAT OF
[02:12:11] SUPERBOWL SUNDAY OR 4TH OF
[02:12:15] JULY WEEKEND, MAYBE EVEN NEW YEARS EVE.
[02:12:16] WHEN I SAW THIS
[02:12:20] INFORMATION I CONTACTED OUR LOCAL POLICE
[02:12:21] STATION AND ASKED FOR
[02:12:24] THEIR SUPPORT AND REDONDO BEACH WAS THE
[02:12:25] FIRST TO JUMP ON IT
[02:12:32] AND SAID THIS IS A GOOD INFORMATION AND
[02:12:33] THANK YOU FOR SHARING
[02:12:35] AND GET GRANT MONEY TO PUT PATROL OUT
[02:12:36] THAT NIGHT AND ISSUE A
Page 18 of 94
[02:12:40] PRESS RELEASE. I ASKED HERMOSA WHAT THEY
[02:12:41] WANTED TO DO AND
[02:12:48] THOUGHT IT WAS GREAT TOO BUT HAVEN'T
[02:12:49] GOTTEN BACK. I ENCOURAGE
[02:12:55] YOUR SUPPORT TO JOIN WITH REDONDO BEACH
[02:12:56] AND CHECK POINTS AS
[02:12:59] COUNCIL MEMBER DUCLOS SUGGESTED BECAUSE
[02:13:00] WE HAVE GOT TO LET
[02:13:02] PEOPLE KNOW THAT MARIJUANA IMPAIRED
[02:13:03] DRIVING IS VERY DANGEROUS.
[02:13:07] IN LEGALIZED STATES, MARIJUANA IMPAIRED
[02:13:08] DRIVING TRAFFIC
[02:13:12] FATALITIES HAS GONE WAY UP. INTERESTING
[02:13:13] ALCOHOL IMPAIRED
[02:13:16] TRAFFIC FATALITIES HAVE STAYED PRETTY
[02:13:17] MUCH THE SAME SO IT IS
[02:13:20] MARIJUANA IMPAIRED DRIVING THAT IS
[02:13:21] REALLY DANGEROUS NOW. IF
[02:13:23] YOU PUT ONE BEER IN N TO SOMEONE WHO HAD
[02:13:24] MARIJUANA THEIR RISK
[02:13:29] FOR FATALITIES HAS GONE UP
[02:13:30] EXPONENTIALLY. IT IS THE
[02:13:34] COMBINATION OF ALCOHOL AND MARIJUANA
[02:13:35] TOGETHER MOST LETHAL
[02:13:39] OPPOSED TO JUST BEING ALCOHOL IMPAIRED
[02:13:40] OR MARIJUANA IMPAIRED
[02:13:44] ON ITS OWN. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK FOR YOUR
[02:13:45] SUPPORT AND I HOPE
[02:13:47] THAT YOU CAN DO THAT AND WE HAVE A
[02:13:48] OPPORTUNITY TO SAVE
[02:13:53] COUNTLESS LIVES AND CAN BE LEADERS IN
[02:13:54] THE SOUTH BAY AND IN
[02:13:56] FACT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BECAUSE THIS IS
[02:13:57] A DATE THAT EVERYONE
[02:14:00] IN LEGALIZED STATES NEEDS TO BE AWARE
[02:14:01] OF. THANK YOU.
[02:14:04] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[02:14:05] >> I HAVE DOCUMENTS FOR YOU.
[02:14:15] >> MADAM CLERK, DO YOU HAVE MORE CARDS?
[02:14:21] >> I DO THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THE NEXT
[02:14:22] 3 ARE ANTHONY
[02:14:30] HIGGINS, SARAH HARPER AND NICOLE BIRD.
[02:14:39] >> GOOD EVENING.
[02:14:40] >> HI. YOU ALREADY HAVE MY NAME SO I
[02:14:41] GUESS I DON'T HAVE TO
[02:14:46] REPEAT IT. LAST COUNCIL MEETING THERE
[02:14:47] WAS I SUBMITTED A
Page 19 of 94
[02:14:54] WRITTEN COMMUNICATION AND THERE WAS SOME
[02:14:55] DISCUSSION FOLLOWING
[02:15:00] MY COMMENTS ABOUT ACTIONS THAT THE CITY
[02:15:01] WANTED STAFF TO FOLLOW
[02:15:06] UP ON. I'M HAVING TROUBLE FINDING THAT
[02:15:07] DOCUMENTED IN ANY OF
[02:15:14] THE MINUTES, IN ANY OF THE-THERE'S NO
[02:15:15] RECORD OF IT ANYWHERE-IT
[02:15:28] WAS A RATHER COMPLICATED ISSUE. THE
[02:15:29] ISSUE SHOULD BE
[02:15:31] DOCUMENTED, AND WHEN STAFF GETS BACK TO
[02:15:32] THE CITY COUNCIL THE
[02:15:39] PERSON INVOLVED IN IT, NAMELY ME, SHOULD
[02:15:40] BE NOTIFIED. I
[02:15:43] SHOULD BE ABLE IT GO ONLINE OR SOMETHING
[02:15:44] AND FIND THE RECORD
[02:15:46] OF WHAT WAS REQUESTED. YET, THERE IS
[02:15:47] NONE. THAT TO ME IS
[02:15:52] JUST ACCOUNTABILITY 101. I DON'T WANT TO
[02:15:53] TELL YOU HOW TO
[02:15:58] SOLVE THAT PROBLEM, BUT IT DOES NEED TO
[02:15:59] BE SOLVED. THERE JUST
[02:16:02] NEEDS TO BE ACCOUNTABILITY. I WANTED TO
[02:16:03] GIVE YOU A QUICK
[02:16:06] UPDATE ON THE ST. PATTY'S DAY TRAFFIC ON
[02:16:07] 27TH. ABOUT 5 HOURS
[02:16:14] OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC. 35 PERCENT OF THE
[02:16:15] TIME IT WAS BACKED
[02:16:20] UP FROM VALLEY DRIVE ALL THE WAY UP OVER
[02:16:21] THE CREST ON 27TH
[02:16:25] DOWN TO THE BEACH. YOU COUPLE THE ST.
[02:16:26] PATTY'S HOLIDAY WITH 3
[02:16:33] DAYS MEMORIAL DAY AND LABOR DAY FIESTA
[02:16:34] AND WHEN DONE 27TH
[02:16:42] STREET GET A HOLIDAY? NO, SURPRISINGLY
[02:16:43] MOST OF THE TRAFFIC
[02:16:46] WAS EAST BOUND. EVEN AT 10 A.M. I
[02:16:47] SUSPECT PEOPLE WERE
[02:16:52] LEAVING THE CITY WHEN THEY COULD. THERE
[02:16:53] ARE MITIGATIONS
[02:16:57] THERE. I HAD REQUESTED THAT MAYBE IT
[02:16:58] MADE SENSE TO HAVE A
[02:17:01] TRAFFIC ENGINEER ON SITE SO WE CAN
[02:17:02] OBSERVE WHAT WAS GOING ON.
[02:17:05] FOR INSTANCE, YOU COULD USE LONG FELLOW,
[02:17:06] YOU COULD USE SECOND
[02:17:10] STREET, YOU CAN CATCH THE TRAFFIC COMING
Page 20 of 94
[02:17:11] OUT AND USE MULTIPLE
[02:17:14] ROUTES. IN 24 SECONDS--THE OTHER PROBLEM
[02:17:15] I HAVE IS THERE IS
[02:17:25] JUST A WHOLE LOT OF CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC
[02:17:26] FOR AREAS THAT ARE A
[02:17:33] QUARTER OF MILE FROM PIER AVENUE USING
[02:17:34] 27TH. WHY? WHY CAN'T
[02:17:40] THE CITY AS PART OF THE PERMIT PROCESS
[02:17:41] DIRECT THE TRUCK ROUTE?
[02:17:46] THOSE ARE JUST SOME THOUGHTS. IT IS A
[02:17:47] COMPLICATED ISSUE, BUT
[02:17:51] IT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.
[02:17:52] >> THANK YOU. SARAH.
[02:17:54] >> GOOD EVENING. SARAH HARPER, LIBRARY
[02:17:55] MANAGER AT HERMOSA
[02:18:06] BEACH LIBRARY AND WANT TO HIGHLIGHT A
[02:18:07] COUPLE PROGRAMS COMING
[02:18:09] UP IN APRIL APRIL 12 AT 330 WE HAVE A
[02:18:10] SPECIAL PROGRAM FOR
[02:18:15] CHILDREN AND FAMILIES STORIES FROM THE
[02:18:16] LAND OF IMAGINATION
[02:18:18] WITH MS [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] WHO LIVES
[02:18:19] IN THE LAND OF
[02:18:22] IMAGINATION AND WILL COME FOR A VISIT TO
[02:18:23] OUR HERMOSA BEACH
[02:18:27] LIBRARY TO SHARE HER STORIES WITH OUR
[02:18:28] FAMILIES. AND ALSO ON
[02:18:32] SATURDAY APRIL 20 FROM 3 TO 4 P.M. WE
[02:18:33] HAVE A SPECIAL UKULELE
[02:18:39] CONCERT PERFORMED BY MITCH CHANG, THE
[02:18:40] FOUNDER OF THE SOUTHERN
[02:18:45] CALIFORNIA FESTIVAL AND LOS ANGELES
[02:18:46] INTERNATIONAL UKULELE
[02:18:51] FESTIVAL. DEMONSTRATE BASIC PLAY ING
[02:18:52] TECHNIQUES FOR BOTH. AS
[02:18:59] ESPECIALLY FOR ADULTS 18 AND UP BUT
[02:19:00] EVERYONE IS WELCOME
[02:19:08] ATTEND.
[02:19:09] >> MADAM CLERK DO YOU WANT TO NAME OFF
[02:19:10] THE NEST COUPLE IF YOU
[02:19:12] HAVE ANY?
[02:19:13] >> THOSE ARE THE ONLY CARDS I HAVE.
[02:19:15] >> OKAY. THANK YOU.
[02:19:21] >> HI, GUYS. WE ARE HERE ON BEHALF OF
[02:19:22] LEADERSHIP HERMOSA
[02:19:26] BEACH AND WANTED TO GIVE UPDATE SAID. A
[02:19:27] FEW HAD BEEN AT IT
Page 21 of 94
[02:19:30] BEGINNING WHEN WE WERE GOING OVER THE
[02:19:31] PROCESS OF GETTING THE
[02:19:33] PROJECT CHOSEN AND THE ORIGINAL GOAL WE
[02:19:34] HAD SET AND SO WE ARE
[02:19:38] ON THE CITY LIAISON COMMITTEE. THIS IS
[02:19:39] TYLER AND WE WANTED TO
[02:19:45] GIVE A UPDATE OF THE PROJECT.
[02:19:47] >> THANK YOU, NICOLE. I'M TYLER
[02:19:48] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] PART OF
[02:19:52] LEADERSHIP HERMOSA 2019. WE ARE EXCITED
[02:19:53] BECAUSE WE ARE GOING
[02:19:58] TO PUT HERMOSA ON THE MAP WITH A WALKER
[02:19:59] TOUR OF THE CITY.
[02:20:04] USING THE ZZ TRAVEL APP WHICH ANYONE CAN
[02:20:05] DOWN LOAD ON THE
[02:20:10] PHONES. IT ISN'T A SET ROUTE YOU HAVE TO
[02:20:11] TAKE. WHAT IS NICE
[02:20:13] ABOUT IT IS RIGHT NOW IS WE COMPILE OVER
[02:20:14] 40 DIFFERENT
[02:20:17] CONTENTS, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, PREVIOUS
[02:20:18] EVENTS, MURALS,
[02:20:21] ARTIFACTS ALL THAT TYPE OF STUFF AND
[02:20:22] EACH ONE OF THOSE WILL
[02:20:25] HAVE PICTURES AND A WRITE-UP TO A
[02:20:26] PARAGRAPH LONG WITHIN THIS
[02:20:32] APP AND NOW WHEN YOU WALK THROUGH THE
[02:20:33] CITY AND YOU HAVE THIS
[02:20:35] APP DOWNLOADED YOU WILL GET A
[02:20:36] NOTIFICATION ABOUT A CERTAIN
[02:20:38] ITEM THAT MIGHT BE AROUND YOU THAT YOU
[02:20:39] NEVER NOTICED. THIS
[02:20:44] BUILDING MIGHT HAVE CHANGED OR THIS
[02:20:45] EVENT HAPPENED AT THAT
[02:20:47] SPOT SO REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THAT. WE
[02:20:48] ARE PROJECTED TO HAVE IT
[02:20:51] DONE AROUND MID-JUNE. WE ARE GOING TO
[02:20:52] HAVE A LAUNCH PARTY
[02:20:55] AROUND IT AT THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY. IT
[02:20:56] IS SOMETHING WE ARE
[02:21:00] REALLY POSITIVE ABOUT, REALLY EXCITED.
[02:21:01] OTHER CLASSES HAVE
[02:21:06] DONE DIFFERENT EVENTS AND THAT TYPE OF
[02:21:07] STUFF BUT THIS IS A
[02:21:11] TANGIBLE ITEM THAT IS LONG LASTING AND
[02:21:12] NO OTHER SOUTH BAY CITY
[02:21:15] HAS THIS RIGHT NOW. BUT IT IS SOMETHING
[02:21:16] YOU WILL BE ABLE
Page 22 of 94
[02:21:19] TO-PEOPLE CAN ADD TO IT DOWN THE ROAD
[02:21:20] WITH SMALL BUSINESSES
[02:21:23] WILL BE ABLE TO GET ON THERE AND OFFER
[02:21:24] CERTAIN DETAILS ON
[02:21:26] SPECIALS THEY ARE HAVING, THAT TYPE OF
[02:21:27] STUFF SO WE ARE REALLY
[02:21:30] EXCITED BET IT AND WANTED TO GIVE YOU A
[02:21:31] UPDATE AND KEEP YOU
[02:21:35] POSTED AS A GOES. THANK YOU.
[02:21:37] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALRIGHT. WE HAVE
[02:21:38] RUN OUT OF CARDS SO
[02:21:42] IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN THIS
[02:21:43] GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
[02:21:46] PORTION, PLEASE STEP UP TO THE
[02:21:47] MICROPHONE.
[02:22:04] >> MY NAME IS POLY SNIDER AND I HAVE
[02:22:05] BEEN LIVED IN HERMOSA 50
[02:22:09] YEARS AND MY SON STILL LIVES HERE AND
[02:22:10] GRANDSON STILL LIVES
[02:22:13] HERE SO WE LOVE HERMOSA. FIRST COUNCIL I
[02:22:14] WENT TO COMPLAIN
[02:22:20] ABOUT SOMETHING WAS A BUNCH OF PEOPLE
[02:22:21] WHO GOT TOGETHER, I
[02:22:24] DIDN'T KNOW THEM, THEY SAID PLEASE COME
[02:22:25] AND I SAID WHAT'S THE
[02:22:27] MATTER AND THEY SAID THEY ARE TRYING TO
[02:22:28] KEEP US FROM HAVING
[02:22:30] CHICKENS IN OUR BACKYARD. I DON'T
[02:22:31] REMEMBER WHAT THE DECISION
[02:22:34] WAS, BUT WE ALL THOUGHT THAT WAS PRETTY
[02:22:35] IMPORTANT, AND WHEN I
[02:22:39] MOVED TO HERMOSA BEACH WHEN MY FAMILY
[02:22:40] DID, 190 STOPPED AT THE
[02:22:45] HIGHWAY, IT WAS A DIRT ROAD ALL THE WAY,
[02:22:46] AND I CAN REMEMBER A
[02:22:50] LOT OF FIGHTS THAT WE HAD WITH THE CITY
[02:22:51] OVER THE YEARS AND I
[02:22:53] HAVE THEM ALL LISTED BUT I WILL NOT SAY
[02:22:54] THEM ALL. THIS IS
[02:22:57] PRETTY IMPORTANT TOO, AND I READ ALL THE
[02:22:58] COMMENTS THAT WERE
[02:23:01] ONLINE ABOUT IT, AND WHEN WE FIRST MOVED
[02:23:02] HERE WE COULD SEE THE
[02:23:06] RAILROAD TRACKS FROM OUR FRONT DOOR AND
[02:23:07] THAT'S WHAT IT WAS. I
[02:23:10] STILL CALL IT THE RAILROAD TRACKS, BUT
[02:23:11] THAT'S JUST WHAT OLD
Page 23 of 94
[02:23:13] PEOPLE DO. [LAUGHTER]
[02:23:17] THE KIDS USED TO WAVE AT THE TRAINS
[02:23:18] GOING BY, AND THEN WHEN IT
[02:23:22] WAS ABANDONED WE BOUGHT THOSE SPIKES
[02:23:23] THAT WENT INTO THE-AS A
[02:23:27] FUND RAISER TO MAKE IT INTO A GREEN BELT
[02:23:28] AND THERE WAS SOME I
[02:23:31] GUESS DEVELOPERS AROUND WHO WANTED TO
[02:23:32] DEVELOP THE WHOLE THING
[02:23:35] FOR HOMES AND FOR BUSINESSES, AND WE
[02:23:36] FOUGHT THE CITY FOUGHT,
[02:23:43] WE CAME TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND IT WAS
[02:23:44] VERY IMPORTANT EVEN
[02:23:46] MORE THEN CHICKENS IN THE BACKYARD AND
[02:23:47] FINALLY WE WON AND NOW
[02:23:53] THIS IS GOING TO REALLY DESTROY ONE
[02:23:54] WHOLE END OF THE GREEN
[02:23:57] BELT, AND I'M AGAINST IT. I'M NOT
[02:23:58] AGAINST THE PROJECT, I LOVE
[02:24:02] THE IDEA OF COURSE, I WANT TO FILTER THE
[02:24:03] WATER AND KEEP THE
[02:24:08] TRASH OUT OF IT, BUT I'M AGAINST THE
[02:24:09] LOCATIONS YOU HAVE
[02:24:11] CHOSEN. BOTH MY KIDS WENT TO SOUTH
[02:24:12] SCHOOL AND NOW WE ARE
[02:24:14] GOING TO DIG IT UP TO PUT THIS THING IN,
[02:24:15] IT ISN'T A SCHOOL
[02:24:18] ANYMORE, BUT IN MY HEAD IT IS. THANK
[02:24:19] YOU.
[02:24:22] >> THANKS FOR BEING HERE, POLY. ALRIGHT.
[02:24:23] ANYONE ELSE FOR
[02:24:31] PUBLIC COMMENT? YES?
[02:24:33] >> I'M NICK WELLS, I READ ON ONLINE
[02:24:34] DESCRIPTION OF THE
[02:24:42] INFILTRATION PROJECT. IT LOOKED LIKE IT
[02:24:43] WAS PRETTY OFFICIAL
[02:24:46] AND IN IT IT MENTIONED THAT SOMETIMES
[02:24:47] FOR 48 TO 72 HOURS THERE
[02:24:52] MIGHT BE STANDING WATER, BUT IT TAKES
[02:24:53] MOSQUITOS LONGER THEN
[02:24:56] THAT, SO THE MOSQUITO THING WASN'T A
[02:24:57] PROBLEM, BUT SINCE THIS
[02:25:01] IS ALL RUN OFF DIRTY WATER, ARE WE GOING
[02:25:02] TO HAVE A SMELLY LAKE
[02:25:08] OF WATER FOR 2 OR 3 DAYS JUST STANDING
[02:25:09] THERE? ON THE EAST
[02:25:15] CODE COAST THEY HAD THE WILD FLOOD IN
Page 24 of 94
[02:25:16] NEW JERSEY TO THE
[02:25:21] FINANCIAL DISTRICT OF MANHATTAN. NOBODY
[02:25:22] PREDICTED IT. IT
[02:25:25] EXCEEDED HUNDRED YEAR FLOOD, IT WAS LIKE
[02:25:26] A 250 YEAR FLOOD, SO
[02:25:32] IF SOMETHING HAPPENED LIKE THAT HERE IT
[02:25:33] WILL BE A REAL
[02:25:36] DISASTER AND DON'T KNOW IF IN THE
[02:25:37] DOCUMENTS OR IN THE PROPOSAL
[02:25:39] IS THERE SOME WAY THAT THE MONEY WILL
[02:25:40] COME FROM THESE OTHER
[02:25:44] TOWNS? WILL TORRANCE KICK IN A TON OF
[02:25:45] MONEY, WILL MANHATTAN
[02:25:50] BEACH RESCUE US IF THIS BECOMES A
[02:25:51] DISASTER? AND ALSO THE
[02:25:56] OTHER CONCERN I HAD-IT IS JUST A SHORT
[02:25:57] SUMMARY, THE ONGOING
[02:26:01] MAINTENANCE OF THIS THING, SINCE IT IS
[02:26:02] ON OUR I GUESS PROPERTY
[02:26:06] SO TO SPEAK, WILL THESE OTHER TOWNS JUST
[02:26:07] WASH THEIR HANDS OF
[02:26:10] IT AND SAY WELL, IT IS HERMOSA'S THING
[02:26:11] NOW AND THEN LIKE THE
[02:26:15] OIL DEAL A FEW YEARS AGO THEN WE HAVE A
[02:26:16] REAL FINANCIAL PROBLEM
[02:26:25] TRYING TO MAINTAIN THIS THING. YEAH,
[02:26:26] LIKE THAT'S THE BIG
[02:26:31] CONCERN I HAVE. WHO IS GOING TO PAY IN
[02:26:32] THE EVENT OF A
[02:26:35] DISASTER? WILL THIS BE A SMELLY LAKE FOR
[02:26:36] TWO OR THREE DAYS AT
[02:26:39] A TIME? BECAUSE IT SAYS IT WILL BE
[02:26:40] STANDING WATER. I THOUGHT
[02:26:43] IT WAS GOING TO BE UNDERGROUND BUT
[02:26:44] STANDING WATER FOR 2 OR 3
[02:26:47] DAYS, IT DOESN'T SOUND GOOD.
[02:26:51] >> THANK YOU. ANYONE THAT JUST WALKED IN
[02:26:52] THIS IS GENERAL
[02:26:55] PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. THE NEXT ITEM ON
[02:26:56] THE AGENDA IS THE
[02:27:01] INFILTRATION PROJECT. THERE WILL BE A
[02:27:02] STAFF REPORT AND
[02:27:04] ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
[02:27:05] ANYONE ELSE IN THE
[02:27:08] AUDIENCE HERE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT?
[02:27:11] >> DO I HAVE TO STATE MY NAME?
[02:27:13] >> IF YOU DON'T MIND.
Page 25 of 94
[02:27:14] >> MU KAYLA WEB, 7 O4 ROSECRANS AVENUE
[02:27:15] MANHATTAN BEACH. AS
[02:27:20] SOMEONE WHO LIVED IN MANHATTAN BEACH 15
[02:27:21] YEARS I SEE IT AS VERY
[02:27:25] IMPORTANT WE NOT ONLY RETAIN BUT
[02:27:26] MAINTAIN THE RESOURCES EARTH
[02:27:29] HAS GIVEN US IN THE FORM OF LEISURELY
[02:27:30] ACTIVITIES AND ONE
[02:27:33] INCLUDES THE GREEN BELT. IT IS A MAN
[02:27:34] MADE RESOURCE IT IS
[02:27:37] EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO MAINTAIN THE
[02:27:38] NATURAL PRESERVATIVE WE
[02:27:40] HAVE WITHIN OUR LOCAL COMMUNITY. SOMEONE
[02:27:41] WHO ENJOYS RUNNING
[02:27:44] ALONG THE GREEN BELT AND CUTTING CROSS
[02:27:45] TO GET TO FRIENDS
[02:27:48] HOUSES I SEE THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT AS
[02:27:49] IMPORTANT AND
[02:27:51] BENEFICIAL. THE LOCAL ECOSYSTEM SAID
[02:27:52] ABLE TO DEVELOP IN THE
[02:27:54] SYSTEM ARE IMPORTANT AND THE LOCAL
[02:27:55] COMMUNITY AND AS WELL AS
[02:27:58] THE ORGANIZATION PRESERVATIVES WE HAVE
[02:27:59] BEEN ABLE TO HAVE
[02:28:03] WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY ARE EXTREMELY
[02:28:04] IMPORTANT. THE OCEAN AS
[02:28:06] WELL AS THE GREEN BELT BOTH PROPOSE
[02:28:07] DANGEROUS ISSUES ON THE
[02:28:12] TOPIC OF POLITICAL CLIMATE IN THE U.S.
[02:28:13] AND AS WE SEE THE
[02:28:14] GROWING DIVIDE BETWEEN REPUBLICANS AND
[02:28:15] DEMOCRATS THE CITY OF
[02:28:19] HERMOSA AND MARTIN BEACH HAVE COME
[02:28:20] TOGETHER TO CREATE A
[02:28:24] ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE AREA FOR
[02:28:25] THOSE OF BOTH PARTIES
[02:28:28] BUT BEEN ABLE TO MEET IT THE DEMANDS OF
[02:28:29] BOTH. I BELIEVE WE
[02:28:37] WOULD BE ABLE TO PRESERVE OUR
[02:28:38] ENVIRONMENTAL [INAUDIBLE
[02:28:41] COMMENTS] ALSO CONTINUE TO CREATE A NEW
[02:28:42] AREA FOR GENERATIONS
[02:28:43] TO COME. BUT WITH THE LACK OF
[02:28:44] ENVIRONMENTAL SAFE PP GUARDS IN
[02:28:47] PLACE BY HERMOSA BEACH AND MANHATTAN
[02:28:48] BEACH REGARDING THE OCEAN
[02:28:53] SAFETY IT IS IMPORTANT TO IMPLEMENT THE
Page 26 of 94
[02:28:54] PROJECT. THE PROJECT
[02:28:56] WILL ALLOW FOR GENERATIONS TO COME TO
[02:28:57] HAVE A CLEAN BEACH THAT
[02:28:58] WE HAVE BEEN NOT ONLY INTERNATIONALLY
[02:28:59] RECOGNIZED FOR, BUT HAVE
[02:29:02] BEEN INTERNATIONALLY ACCLAIMED FOR OVER
[02:29:03] THE PAST 50 YEARS.
[02:29:05] MANHATTAN BEACH AND HERMOSA BEACH HAVE
[02:29:06] BEEN THE LEAD ERS IN
[02:29:10] THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITIES SAND
[02:29:11] DISTRIBUTION PROJECTS WHICH
[02:29:15] HELPED BEACHES ALL OVER HAWAII AND IN
[02:29:16] THE INTERNATIONAL
[02:29:19] COMMUNITY TO HAVE EQUAL ACCESS TO STAND
[02:29:20] WHICH SEEMS LIKE A
[02:29:23] SMALL ISSUE BUT IT IS IMPERATIVE
[02:29:24] INSURING THE CITIZENS HAVE A
[02:29:26] RIGHT TO THE PROPER BEACH. I HAVE A
[02:29:27] STRONG ADVOCATE FOR THE
[02:29:31] PROJECT BECAUSE IT ALLOWS CITIZENS TO
[02:29:32] HAVE SEQUEL ACCESS TO
[02:29:35] THE ENVIRONMENT AND PRESERVE THE
[02:29:36] ENVIRONMENT FOR SEVERAL
[02:29:39] GENERATIONS THAT WISH TO USE THE GREEN
[02:29:40] BELT TO CUT ACROSS THE
[02:29:43] FRIENDS HOUSES AND RUNNING AND OTHER
[02:29:44] ACTIVITIES. THE BEACH IS
[02:29:47] EXTREMELY IMPORTANT BUT NEED TO
[02:29:48] IMPLEMENT THIS TO ALLOW THE
[02:29:50] BEACH TO HAVE A GROWING HELPFUL REGION
[02:29:51] FOR GENERATIONS TO
[02:29:54] COME. THANK YOU.
[02:29:55] >> THANK YOU, MU KAYLA. ANYONE ELSE FOR
[02:29:56] PUBLIC COMMENT?
[02:30:01] ALRIGHT. SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE
[02:30:02] THIS PUBLIC COMMENT
[02:30:05] RIGHT NOW AND MADAM CLERK--
[02:30:12] >> MAY I GET A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND
[02:30:13] FILE ON THE WRITTEN
[02:30:17] COMMUNICATION?
[02:30:18] >> DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND
[02:30:19] FILE?
[02:30:21] >> SO MOVED.
[02:30:22] >> SECOND.
[02:30:23] >> ALRIGHT. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? ALL
[02:30:24] THOSE IN FAVOR?
[02:30:26] >> AYE.
Page 27 of 94
[02:30:27] >> ALRIGHT. MADAM CLERK.
[02:30:31] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THE CONSENT
[02:30:32] CALENDAR AND BEFORE
[02:30:38] ANYONE LETS US KNOW IF YOU LIKE TO PULL
[02:30:39] ANY ITEMS WE DO HAVE
[02:30:42] THREE SUPPLEMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
[02:30:43] ITEMS AND LET YOU KNOW
[02:30:47] ABOUT THEM RIGHT NOW.
[02:30:48] >> PLEASE.
[02:30:49] >> THANK YOU. FOR ITEM 2F WE HAVE A
[02:30:50] COMMENT FROM CLAUDIA
[02:30:54] BERMEN. 2M A LETTER FROM ANTHONY HIGGINS
[02:30:55] RECEIVED TODAY AND
[02:31:00] 2O A E COMMENT FROM DAVID GRIFFON
[02:31:01] RECEIVED YESTERDAY. THANK
[02:31:06] YOU.
[02:31:07] >> ALRIGHT. DO MY COLLEAGUES WANT TO
[02:31:08] PULL ANY ITEMS?
[02:31:14] >> THE VOTING BUTTON FROM APPROVAL OF
[02:31:15] THE AGENDA IS STUCK ON
[02:31:18] MY SCREEN SO IF THERE IS WAY TO CLEAR
[02:31:19] THAT THAT WOULD HELP.
[02:31:22] >> I'LL HELP YOU WITH THAT IN A SECOND.
[02:31:23] COUNCIL MEMBER
[02:31:26] FANGARY.
[02:31:27] >> I LIKE TO PULL 2J THE ACTION MINUTES
[02:31:28] OF PUBLIC WORKS. 2I
[02:31:34] CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. ITEM 2P THE NORTH
[02:31:35] SCHOOL
[02:31:41] RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT SUBCOMMITTEE AND
[02:31:42] MOU.
[02:31:46] >> J, I, P.
[02:31:49] >> YES.
[02:31:50] >> J, I, P.
[02:31:54] >> OKAY. ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANYTHING TO
[02:31:55] PULL FROM CONSENT? DO
[02:31:58] I HAVE A MOTION AND
[02:32:00] >> MOTION WE RECEIVE THE BALANCE.
[02:32:02] >> SECOND.
[02:32:03] >> ALL THOSE IN-
[02:32:05] >> MOTION TO APPROVE THE BALANCE.
[02:32:07] >> APPROVE THE BALANCE.
[02:32:08] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[02:32:11] >> AYE.
[02:32:14] >> ALRIGHT. MADAM CLERK.
[02:32:17] >> WE'LL COME BACK TO THOSE THEN?
[02:32:20] >> YES; PLEASE.
Page 28 of 94
[02:32:21] >> THANK YOU.
[02:32:27] >> NEXT IS OUR MUNICIPAL MATTER AND
[02:32:28] ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST
[02:32:37] KRISTY MORRIS IS HERE WITH A STAFF
[02:32:38] REPORT. THANK YOU. GOOD
[02:32:47] EVENING.
[02:32:49] >> WHILE SHE GETS SETTLED I CAN LET YOU
[02:32:50] KNOW ABOUT
[02:32:53] SUPPLEMENTALS.
[02:32:54] >> PLEASE DO.
[02:32:55] >> THANK YOU. WE RECEIVED 115E COMMENTS
[02:32:56] BETWEEN MARCH 22 AND
[02:33:02] TODAY. WE RECEIVED E-MAIL AND
[02:33:03] ATTACHMENTS FROM PETER TUCKER
[02:33:07] TODAY. LETTER FROM DAVID GRANTUM AND
[02:33:08] LETTER FROM REDONDO
[02:33:13] BEACH MAYOR BILL BRAND TODAY AS WELL.
[02:33:16] >> KRISTY, WHEN YOU ARE READY.
[02:33:18] >> GOOD EVENING MADAM MAYOR AND FELLOW
[02:33:19] COUNCIL MEMBERS. JUST
[02:33:22] BEAR WITH ME, I HAVE A REPORT TODAY, IT
[02:33:23] IS A VERBAL REPORT. I
[02:33:26] DON'T HAVE A PRESENTATION. BUT I DID
[02:33:27] WANT TO WALK THROUGH THE
[02:33:32] STEPS HOW WE ENDED UP WHERE WE ARE. BACK
[02:33:33] IN FEBRUARY 2013 THE
[02:33:37] PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR PRESENTED OPTIONS
[02:33:38] TO COUNCIL FOR
[02:33:40] COMPLYING WITH THE 2012 MUNICIPAL STORM
[02:33:41] SEWER SYSTEM PERMIT OR
[02:33:46] MS4 PERMIT. COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF TO
[02:33:47] PROCEED WITH THE
[02:33:50] ENHANCED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN
[02:33:51] OPTION TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL
[02:33:53] TIME TO COMPLETE THE PLANS AND COMPLY
[02:33:54] WITH THE WATER QUALITY
[02:33:57] STANDARD USING EFFORT BASE AND NUMERICAL
[02:33:58] LIMITS. OTHER
[02:34:06] BENEFITS OF ENTERING INTO ENHANCED WATER
[02:34:07] SHOULD MANAGEMENT
[02:34:11] PLAN WITH BEACH CITY COUNTER PART IS
[02:34:12] OTHER BENEFITS INCLUDING
[02:34:15] COST SHARING ON PROJECT AND ECONOMY OF
[02:34:16] SCALE. THE CITIES OF
[02:34:20] HERMOSA BEACH, TORRANCE, [INAUDIBLE
[02:34:21] COMMENTS] FORMED THE BEACH
[02:34:25] CITY WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GROUP APPROVED
Page 29 of 94
[02:34:26] BY THE REGIONAL BOARD
[02:34:31] IN 2016. FOLLOWING THE REGIONAL BOARD
[02:34:32] APPROVAL OF THE
[02:34:35] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] THE CITY IN
[02:34:36] PARTNERSHIP WITH THE BEACH
[02:34:37] CITIES WATER SHOULD MANAGEMENT GROUP
[02:34:38] SUBMITTED GRANT
[02:34:42] APPLICATION TO THE STATE BOARD FOR
[02:34:43] DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF
[02:34:45] THE GREEN BELT INFILTRATION PROJECT. THE
[02:34:46] HIGHEST PRIORITY
[02:34:49] PROJECT BECAUSE IT WOULD ACHIEVE THE
[02:34:50] GREATEST REDUCTION IN
[02:34:53] BACTERIA AT THE DRAIN OUT-FALL.
[02:34:54] REGARDING THE SELECTION OF
[02:34:58] THE LOCATION FOR THE PROJECT IN THE
[02:34:59] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] AS WE
[02:35:02] HEARD AT THE JUNE AND OCTOBER MEETINGS,
[02:35:03] THERE WAS A MODELING
[02:35:07] TOOL THAT WAS INVOLVED AND IT WAS BASED
[02:35:08] ON A NUMBER OF
[02:35:14] ELEMENTS. SOILS WEST OF PACIFIC COAST
[02:35:15] HIGHWAY, THE SUITABLE
[02:35:21] INFILTRATING WATER QUICKLY. SUFFICIENT
[02:35:22] DEPTH FROM THE GROUND
[02:35:29] SURFACE TO WATER TABLE AND IN TERMS OF
[02:35:30] THE MODELING TOOL ONCE
[02:35:34] WE FOUND SITES PUBLICLY OWNED AND
[02:35:35] AVAILABLE IT WEIGHTED SITES
[02:35:39] WITH PARCEL SIZE OF.1 ACRES AND 500
[02:35:40] DISTANCE FROM THE STORM
[02:35:44] DRAIN. THE PROP 1 GRANT AMOUNT IS $3.1
[02:35:45] MILLION AND REPRESENTS
[02:35:52] HALF OF THE ESTIMATED COST. THE BALANCE
[02:35:53] OF THE PROJECT COST
[02:35:56] MUST BE PROVIDED AS MATCHING FUNDS BY
[02:35:57] THE MEMBERS OF THE BEACH
[02:35:59] CITY WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GROUP. THE
[02:36:00] CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
[02:36:03] SHARE OF THE DESIGN COST IS $115
[02:36:04] THOUSAND OR 13.6 PERCENT AND
[02:36:08] THIS IS BASED ON THE WATERSHED AREA
[02:36:09] CONTRIBUTING TO THE DRAIN
[02:36:12] AND THE CURRENT ESTIMATE FOR THE
[02:36:13] CONSTRUCTION COST FOR THE
[02:36:15] CITY IS $460 THOUSAND. FOR HERMOSA BEACH
[02:36:16] THE TOTAL BUDGET IS
Page 30 of 94
[02:36:21] APPROXIMATELY $580 THOUSAND. IN
[02:36:22] ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCOPE OF
[02:36:26] WORK AND SCHEDULE TETRA TECH COMMENCED
[02:36:27] SITE SURVEYS AND
[02:36:31] DEVELOPED DESIGNS PRESENTED AT THE
[02:36:32] COMMUNITY WORKSHOP HELD
[02:36:36] MARCH 2019, 20 [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS]
[02:36:37] SPECIAL STUDY SESSION JUNE
[02:36:44] 19. BASED ON THE FEEDBACK AND CONCERN
[02:36:45] STAFF PROVIDED ANALYSIS
[02:36:51] OF PROJECT SITES IN HERMOSA BEACH AT THE
[02:36:52] OCTOBER 9 CITY
[02:36:55] COUNCIL MEETING. THESE LOCATIONS
[02:36:56] INCLUDED THE GREEN BELT,
[02:36:59] NORTH OF SECOND STREET, THE TURF FIELD
[02:37:00] UNDER SOUTH PARK ON
[02:37:03] VALLEY DRIVE AND HERONDO STREET. IT WAS
[02:37:04] SUBSEQUENT LY
[02:37:09] DETERMINED THE HERONDO DRIVE PROJECT
[02:37:10] SITE WAS PARTIALLY
[02:37:12] LOCATED IN THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH SO
[02:37:13] WITH THE OUTCOME OF
[02:37:19] THE MEETING BEING FOR MAYOR [INAUDIBLE
[02:37:20] COMMENTS] TO IF GAUGE
[02:37:26] REDONDO BEACH OR TORRANCE TO DISCUSS
[02:37:27] RELOCATING OUTSIDE
[02:37:32] HERMOSA BEACH OR DIVIDING INTO SMALLER
[02:37:33] PROJECT THAT MIGHT HAVE
[02:37:37] BEEN A POSSIBLE LOCATION AT THE TIME.
[02:37:38] COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEES
[02:37:40] OF HER MOSEY AND REDONDO BEACH MET MARCH
[02:37:41] 5 AND DISCUSSED
[02:37:47] POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVE PROJECT SITES.
[02:37:48] DESPITE DISCUSSION THERE
[02:37:51] WAS NO CONSENSUS ON PURSUING A SITE IN
[02:37:52] REDONDO BEACH. ON
[02:38:00] FEBRUARY 4, 2019 CITY STAFF MET WITH
[02:38:01] REDONDO BEACH, MANHATTAN
[02:38:05] BEACH AND TORRANCE STAFF TO DISCUSS HOW
[02:38:06] TO PROCEED WITH THE
[02:38:08] PROJECT UNDER THE CURRENT MOU FOR DESIGN
[02:38:09] TO RETAIN THE PROP 1
[02:38:13] GRANT FUNDING. STAFF EXPRESSED IF THE
[02:38:14] ORIGINAL MOU CANNOT BE
[02:38:19] EXECUTED THEY WOULD LIKE HERMOSA BEACH
[02:38:20] COUNCIL TO SEND A
[02:38:23] LETTER TO THE RESPECTIVE CITY COUNCILS
Page 31 of 94
[02:38:24] ASKING THE COUNTER
[02:38:29] PARTS TO-DURING THE TIME THE STATE BOARD
[02:38:30] OF DIVISION OF
[02:38:34] FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE ALSO NOTIFIED THE
[02:38:35] CITY WE ARE IN BREACH
[02:38:37] OF THE GRANT AGREEMENT DUE TO
[02:38:38] OUTSTANDING ITEMS AND LIMITED
[02:38:41] PROGRESS ON THE PROJECT. ALL THE
[02:38:42] REQUESTED ITEMS HAVE BEEN
[02:38:44] SUBMITTED THE CITY IS IN BEACH OF
[02:38:45] AGREEMENT UNTIL A SITE IS
[02:38:51] IDENTIFIED. THE CITY IS PROVIDED THE
[02:38:52] OPPORTUNITY BY THE STATE
[02:38:54] BOARD TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS AND SUBMIT
[02:38:55] PROJECT PLANS OR
[02:38:57] IDENTIFY A SITE IN OTHER FORMS OF
[02:38:58] INFORMATION TO ALLOW THE
[02:39:02] STATE BOARD TO CONSIDER SUBSTITUTION OF
[02:39:03] THE PROJECT BY APRIL
[02:39:05] 1. AN ALTERNATIVE PROJECT NEEDS TO MEET
[02:39:06] THE PROP 1 GRANT
[02:39:11] AGREEMENT REQUIREMENTS DEMONSTRATING
[02:39:12] SIMILAR WATER QUALITY
[02:39:15] BENEFIT TO THE GREEN BELT PROJECT AND
[02:39:16] APPROVED BY BOTH THE
[02:39:19] STATE BOARD AND REGIONAL BOARD THROUGH
[02:39:20] AN AMENDMENT TO OUR
[02:39:23] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] ALTERNATIVELY CITY
[02:39:24] COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE TO
[02:39:28] ABANDON A PROJECT BY AMENDMENT OR
[02:39:29] DISSOLUTION OF THE MOU AND
[02:39:33] RELINQUISH THE GRANT FUNDING. THE CITY
[02:39:34] NEEDS TO PROVIDE
[02:39:40] NOTICE TO THE REGIONAL BOARD TERMINATING
[02:39:41] THE MOU AND STAFF
[02:39:43] NEEDS TO MEET WITH THE BOARD TO
[02:39:44] DETERMINE HOW TO VIEW SUCH
[02:39:46] TERMINATION AND WHAT OUR ALTERNATIVE
[02:39:47] REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE TO
[02:39:51] STAY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE [INAUDIBLE
[02:39:52] COMMENTS] SO THEREFORE,
[02:39:55] STAFF RECOMMENDS CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER
[02:39:56] AND PROVIDE DIRECTION
[02:39:58] ON THE FOLLOWING THREE OPTIONS TO
[02:39:59] ADDRESS THE REQUIREMENTS OF
[02:40:01] THE GRANT AGREEMENT AND COST SHARING MOU
[02:40:02] FOR THE PROJECT. THE
Page 32 of 94
[02:40:06] FIRST OPTION IS PROCEED WITH PROJECT AT
[02:40:07] THE EXISTING GREEN
[02:40:09] BELT LOCATION. OR TWO, PROCEED WITH THE
[02:40:10] PROJECT AT A
[02:40:13] ALTERNATIVE LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY
[02:40:14] JURISDICTION OR THREE,
[02:40:20] INITIATE DISSOLUTION OR AMENDMENT OF THE
[02:40:21] MOU AND NEGOTIATE A
[02:40:25] SUITABLE SUBSTITUTE OR REVISED MOU AND
[02:40:26] PROJECT WITH THE CITY
[02:40:30] PARTNERS AND RELINQUISH THE GRANT AND
[02:40:31] FORFEIT THE GRANT
[02:40:34] FUNDING AND THAT CONCLUDES THE STAFF
[02:40:35] REPORT THIS EVENING.
[02:40:37] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. KRISTY, DO MY
[02:40:38] COLLEAGUES HAVE
[02:40:43] QUESTIONS? COUNCIL MEMBER MASSEY.
[02:40:46] >> JUST A CLARIFYING QUESTION TO THE
[02:40:47] PUBLIC COMMENT SAID WE
[02:40:49] HEARD. THERE IS A COST SHARING
[02:40:50] ARRANGEMENT. IS THERE COST
[02:40:58] SHARING WITH OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
[02:40:59] COST?
[02:41:00] >> TWO THINGS, WE CAN COST SHARE ON THE
[02:41:01] OPERATIONAL
[02:41:02] MAINTENANCE COST OR WITH THE PASSING OF
[02:41:03] MEASURE W LOS ANGELES
[02:41:07] COUNTY WILL UPON REQUEST CONSIDER TAKING
[02:41:08] OVER THE OPERATION
[02:41:11] AND MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR REGIONAL
[02:41:12] PROJECTS SO THAT IN THAT
[02:41:17] SCENARIO WE WOULDN'T NEED TO BE PAYING
[02:41:18] FOR THE OPERATION AND
[02:41:20] MAINTENANCE.
[02:41:21] >> THANK YOU, KRISTY.
[02:41:22] >> COUNCIL MEMBER DUCLOS.
[02:41:25] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. I THINK YOU
[02:41:26] STARTED BY TALKING
[02:41:29] ABOUT THE 2016 AGREEMENT, BUT THE
[02:41:30] FORMATION OF THIS WATERSHED
[02:41:35] GROUP WAS AROUND 2013 AND THE DISCUSSION
[02:41:36] ABOUT THE FORMATION
[02:41:41] PRECEDED THAT PROBABLY A COUPLE YEARS IN
[02:41:42] THE MAKING. IT WOULD
[02:41:46] BE HELPFUL TO KNOW BECAUSE I CAN GIVE
[02:41:47] YOU MY RECOLLECTION OF
[02:41:55] HOW THAT WAS VIEWED BY THE COUNCIL AT
Page 33 of 94
[02:41:56] THAT TIME. PLEASE
[02:42:00] CORRECT ME AND YOU OR THE CITY ATTORNEY
[02:42:01] IF I'M WRONG. THIS
[02:42:06] WAS PERCEIVED AS A MAJOR VICTORY FOR THE
[02:42:07] CITY AS A SMALL CITY
[02:42:14] WITH LIMITED FUNDS AND VERY LIMITED
[02:42:15] FUNDS BACK THEN IN 2010,
[02:42:19] 11, 12. WE HAD A MANDATE FROM THE
[02:42:20] REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
[02:42:23] CONTROL BOARD TO MITIGATE A PROBLEM THAT
[02:42:24] WAS OUR PROBLEM, AND
[02:42:30] UNLIKE OUR NEIGHBORING CITIES, WE DIDN'T
[02:42:31] HAVE THE RESOURCES TO
[02:42:35] DO THAT AND THERE WAS REALLY-THE
[02:42:36] ONLY-THE SAVING GRACE OF THIS
[02:42:43] FACT WAS THAT WE WERE ABLE TO JOIN WITH
[02:42:44] THESE OTHER CITIES AND
[02:42:48] TO SPREAD THE COST OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF
[02:42:49] A PROJECT AND THAT'S
[02:42:54] REALLY IN MY RECOLLECTION EXACTLY HOW
[02:42:55] THIS STARTED. IT ALWAYS
[02:42:59] STARTED BASED ON A MANDATE AND
[02:43:00] REQUIREMENT FOR THE CITY OR
[02:43:03] HERMOSA BEACH BECAUSE WE ARE THE OUTFALL
[02:43:04] POINT FOR THE HERONDO
[02:43:09] DRAIN TO MITIGATE WHICH WAS THEN AND
[02:43:10] CONTINUES TO BE ONE OF
[02:43:12] THE MOST POLLUTED AREAS IN THE SOUTH
[02:43:13] BAY. THAT'S MY
[02:43:18] RECOLLECTION. IF I-DOES THAT SOUND
[02:43:19] CORRECT, MIKE IF YOU HAVE
[02:43:23] THOUGHTS ON THAT?
[02:43:24] >> SOUNDS CORRECT.
[02:43:25] >> AND CAN'T REMEMBER-I MAY HAVE MORE
[02:43:26] LATER, BUT THAT WAS-I
[02:43:32] THINK IT IS A IMPORTANT PART OF THIS
[02:43:33] EQUATION IN TERMS OF WHY
[02:43:37] WE STARTED DOWN THIS ROAD AND WHY WE
[02:43:38] PARTNERED WITH THEM AND
[02:43:40] WHAT I DON'T FEEL IS EXPRESSED HERE
[02:43:41] APPROPRIATELY IS THE FACT
[02:43:46] THAT THERE IS A COST SHARING ELEMENT
[02:43:47] HERE IN TERMS OF WHAT WE
[02:43:54] ARE-HOW WE ARE APPROACHING THIS NOW AND
[02:43:55] WHAT HAPPENS SHOULD WE
[02:44:01] DISSOLVE THAT RELATIONSHIP AND WE OPT TO
[02:44:02] GO ON OUR OWN. IT
Page 34 of 94
[02:44:08] WOULD BE HELPFUL TO HAVE A SENSE WHAT IS
[02:44:09] THAT LOOK LIKE AS
[02:44:12] WELL AS IN TERMS OF COST FOR THE CITY
[02:44:13] AND CONSEQUENCES BECAUSE
[02:44:17] WE WOULD BE IN BREACH NOT JUST OF AN
[02:44:18] AGREEMENT BUT WE ARE IN
[02:44:22] BREACH OF PROJECTED MILESTONES WE AGREED
[02:44:23] TO IN TERMS OF
[02:44:26] DEALING OUR PROBLEM. CAN YOU GIVE ME A
[02:44:27] SENSE OF THAT BECAUSE
[02:44:34] WE HAVEN'T TALKED ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES
[02:44:35] OF TAKING AN ACTION
[02:44:38] TO BASICALLY DISSOLVING THE RELATIONSHIP
[02:44:39] AND GOING ON THIS ON
[02:44:43] OUR OWN. ALSO WHAT ISN'T DISCUSSED OR
[02:44:44] MENTIONED HERE IS THE
[02:44:47] CONCEPT OF DOING NOTHING. WHAT DOES THAT
[02:44:48] MEAN FOR THE CITY?
[02:44:54] >> SO, WE HAVE KATHLEEN MCGOWEN HERE WHO
[02:44:55] CAN TALK TO WHAT OUR
[02:45:03] OPTIONS ARE IN TERMS OF IF WE HAD TO
[02:45:04] WALK THIS BACK AND
[02:45:07] DISSOLVE THE MOU. I KNOW THAT OUR CITY
[02:45:08] ATTORNEY HAS SOME
[02:45:12] OPINIONS ON WHAT THE LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS
[02:45:13] AND COST
[02:45:18] RAMIFICATIONS ARE. I CAN TELL YOU THAT
[02:45:19] TO THE COST FOR US TO
[02:45:23] HAVE TO BUILD OUR OWN PROJECTS ISN'T
[02:45:24] SCALABLE, SO I DO KNOW
[02:45:28] THAT WE PROBABLY WOULD NEED A LARGE-IT'S
[02:45:29] NOT SCALABLE, SO EVEN
[02:45:34] THOUGH WE REDUCE THE SIZE OF THE
[02:45:35] PROJECT, THE COST OF THE
[02:45:38] PROJECT WOULDN'T DECREASE
[02:45:39] PROPORTIONATELY. WE STILL NEED
[02:45:41] LARGE PROJECTS IN THE CITY. SO, TO
[02:45:42] CAPTURE JUST OUR WATERSHED
[02:45:46] AREA WHICH IS 283 ACRES THAT DRAIN TO
[02:45:47] THE PROPOSED PROJECT, IT
[02:45:51] STILL COST US IN THE MAGNITUDE OF $6
[02:45:52] MILLION TO BUILD THAT
[02:45:56] PROJECT AT A SMALLER SCALE. THAT'S THE
[02:45:57] COST SIDE OF THINGS.
[02:46:01] I KNOW THE CITY ATTORNEY CAN TALK TO THE
[02:46:02] LEGAL IMPLICATION.
[02:46:10] >> JUST WITH REFERENCE TO YOUR QUESTION
Page 35 of 94
[02:46:11] ABOUT THE DOING
[02:46:14] NOTHING OPTION, THAT'S NOT A OPTION. AND
[02:46:15] THAT'S NOT A OPTION
[02:46:18] BECAUSE IF WE DO NOTHING THEN WE
[02:46:19] ULTIMATELY BECOME SUBJECT TO
[02:46:22] NUMERICAL REQUIREMENTS WHICH ARE NOT
[02:46:23] ACHIEVABLE. IN WHICH
[02:46:31] EVENT WE SUBJECT TO CATASTROPHIC FINES
[02:46:32] AND POTENTIAL
[02:46:36] LITIGATION SO DOING NOTHING AND NOT
[02:46:37] MEETING THE NUMERICAL
[02:46:42] REQUIREMENTS IN THE RECEIVING WATER IS
[02:46:43] SIMPLY NOT A OPTION FOR
[02:46:44] THE CITY. IT IS IMPRUDENT PLANNING TO
[02:46:45] SIMPLY DO NOTHING.
[02:46:50] >> WHEN YOU SUGGEST LEGAL ACTIONS
[02:46:51] BETWEEN-THERE IS POTENTIALLY
[02:46:55] MULTIPLE AGENCIES?
[02:46:56] >> THERE IS THE BOARD, THE REGIONAL
[02:46:57] BOARD.
[02:47:01] >> ALSO IN VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN WATER
[02:47:02] ACT.
[02:47:04] >> THIRD PARTY LITIGATION BY GROUPS THAT
[02:47:05] ADVOCATE FOR CLEAN
[02:47:12] WATER AND THAT INCREASE THE POTENTIAL
[02:47:13] FOR FINES UP TO $37
[02:47:15] THOUSAND PER DAY. HAVING A PHYSICAL
[02:47:16] INFRASTRUCTURE ISN'T A
[02:47:26] VIABLE ALTERNATIVE. THERE MUST BE
[02:47:27] PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND
[02:47:30] SO AS I SEE IT, YOU HAVE ANOTHER THE
[02:47:31] CURRENT PATH WHICH IS
[02:47:42] GREEN BELT PATH, YOU HAVE THE SECOND
[02:47:43] PATH, WHICH IS FIND
[02:47:46] ANOTHER LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY THAT
[02:47:47] WILL ACCOMMODATE A
[02:47:52] SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR FACILITY. AND
[02:47:53] ACCOMPLISH THE GOAL OF
[02:47:57] THE EXISTING MOU WHICH IS THE SOUTH PARK
[02:47:58] SIDE OR THIRD PATH
[02:48:05] WHICH IS A UNCERTAIN PATH. UNCERTAIN
[02:48:06] PATH COULD INVOLVE
[02:48:16] RENEGOTIATION OF THE MOU OR REVISION OR
[02:48:17] NEW MOU DEPENDENT ON
[02:48:20] THE WILLINGNESS OF THE PARTNERS, IT
[02:48:21] INVOLVES SUBSTANTIAL
[02:48:25] NEGOTIATION WITH THE REGIONAL BOARD. CAN
Page 36 of 94
[02:48:26] COULD INVOLVE
[02:48:30] NEGOTIATIONS OVER THE [INAUDIBLE
[02:48:31] COMMENTS] EACH PARTIES GOING
[02:48:33] IT ALONE. IT WILL INVOLVE INFRASTRUCTURE
[02:48:34] BUT AS KRISTY SAID,
[02:48:40] THE COST OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS NOT
[02:48:41] SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT.
[02:48:47] THE POSSIBILITY OF GETTING A NEW
[02:48:48] GRANT-WE WILL LOSE THE
[02:48:52] EXISTING GRANT FOR SURE. WHETHER WE GET
[02:48:53] A NEW GRANT OR NOT IS
[02:48:56] UNCLEAR. WHETHER WE CAN FIND A LOCATION
[02:48:57] FOR OTHER PROJECTS
[02:49:04] SMALLER PROJECTS AND I DON'T KNOW HOW
[02:49:05] MUCH SMALLER THEY COULD
[02:49:08] BE AND DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS LOCATIONS
[02:49:09] EITHER A, AVAILABLE OR
[02:49:12] B, NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME SORT OF
[02:49:13] OPPOSITION THAT WE HAVE
[02:49:15] SEEN FROM THE EXISTING PROJECT IS A
[02:49:16] QUESTION. SO THAT THIRD
[02:49:20] PATH IS A VERY UNCERTAIN PATH. IT IS
[02:49:21] FRAUGHT WITH OBSTACLES
[02:49:25] AND IT'S VERY UNPREDICTABLE, VERY
[02:49:26] DIFFICULT TO SAY WHAT THE
[02:49:30] END WOULD LOOK LIKE KEEPING IN MIND THAT
[02:49:31] WE HAVE A DEADLINE
[02:49:35] AND THAT WE ARE ON A PRETTY TIGHT
[02:49:36] DEADLINE AS IT IS. IF WE
[02:49:41] END UP HAVING TO GO INTO MONTHS AND
[02:49:42] MONTHS OF NEGOTIATION WITH
[02:49:45] OUR PARTNERS TO HAVE A NEW MOU, TO
[02:49:46] CONSIDER WHETHER THEY WOULD
[02:49:49] PUT PROJECTS IN THEIR CITIES OR WHETHER
[02:49:50] WE HAVE MULTIPLE
[02:49:54] PROJECTS THIS WILL TAKE A SUBSTANTIAL
[02:49:55] AMOUNT OF TIME. LOOK
[02:49:58] HOW LONG IT HAS BEEN FROM WHEN WE
[02:49:59] STARTED THIS TO NOW AND WE
[02:50:04] ARE EXPECTED TO HAVE A COMPLETE PROJECT
[02:50:05] IN A VERY SHORT AMOUNT
[02:50:10] OF TIME. AND SO THAT'S JUST MY
[02:50:11] PERSPECTIVE ON THE DIFFICULT
[02:50:18] CHOICE THE COUNCIL FACES TONIGHT. WE
[02:50:19] WILL LOSE THE GRANT IF
[02:50:24] WE DONT TELL THE BOARD ON APRIL 1 OR
[02:50:25] BEFORE APRIL 1 THAT WE
Page 37 of 94
[02:50:28] HAVE A PROJECT SITE. THAT'S ABSOLUTE
[02:50:29] GIVEN. I DO NOT BELIEVE
[02:50:34] WE WILL HAVE A OPPORTUNITY TO GET AN
[02:50:35] EXTENSION OF THE
[02:50:38] DEADLINE. ONCE WE LOSE THE GRANT THEN WE
[02:50:39] ARE FACED WITH THIS
[02:50:43] UNCERTAIN FUTURE. THAT CONCLUDES MY
[02:50:44] COMMENTS.
[02:50:48] >> THANK YOU.
[02:50:52] >> TO MY COLLEAGUES OVER HERE. MAYOR PRO
[02:50:53] TEM.
[02:50:58] >> THANK YOU. CAN I CLARIFY YOU AND
[02:50:59] COUNCIL MEMBER FANGARY
[02:51:04] WHO WERE OUR SUBCOMMITTEE TO INTERACT
[02:51:05] WITH REDONDO BEACH AND
[02:51:12] WHATEVER EXTENT TO THE PARTNER CITIES
[02:51:13] YOU WILL GIVE US A
[02:51:16] DOWNLOAD OF THE PROGRESS OR NOT OF THE
[02:51:17] CONVERSATIONS AT SOME
[02:51:20] POINT THIS EVENING SO THAT WILL PERMIT
[02:51:21] ME ASKING A COUPLE OF
[02:51:23] THE QUESTIONS NOW. SHOULD I JUST WAIT TO
[02:51:24] DELIBERATION?
[02:51:27] >> YOU CAN ASK THOSE QUESTIONS NOW.
[02:51:28] WE'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER
[02:51:31] THEM.
[02:51:32] >> OKAY, IN TERMS OF CLARIFYING
[02:51:33] QUESTIONS ON THE REPORT KRISTY
[02:51:38] HAS GIBBON THE FIRST QUESTION IS ABOUT
[02:51:39] THE EXTENDED TIMELINE
[02:51:42] TO APRIL 1. SO, I KIND OF TWO RELATED
[02:51:43] QUESTIONS. ONE IS, IF
[02:51:50] IT CAN BE DESCRIBED FOR EVERYONE HERE,
[02:51:51] WHAT WOULD THAT LOOK
[02:51:55] LIKE AFTER TONIGHT? THE STEPS AND THE
[02:51:56] PROCESS IF WE DID NOT
[02:52:00] GO FORWARD WITH THE ORIGINAL IDENTIFIED
[02:52:01] PROJECT, WHICH IS THE
[02:52:04] GREEN BELT PROJECT? SO, THAT IS SUCH A
[02:52:05] SHORT WINDOW. LET'S
[02:52:08] JUST USE AN EXAMPLE AND SAY WE PIVOTED
[02:52:09] AND GAVE DIRECTION TO
[02:52:13] PURSUE SOUTH PARK AS A ALTERNATIVE. WHAT
[02:52:14] WOULD BE THE STEPS
[02:52:19] TO APRIL 1 BECAUSE THERE IS SOMETHING IN
[02:52:20] THE LANGUAGE THAT
[02:52:23] SAYS WE HAVE TO PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE
Page 38 of 94
[02:52:24] PLANS IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL
[02:52:31] IN ORDER TO POTENTIALLY SAVE THE MOU, IS
[02:52:32] THAT ACCURATE? I SAY
[02:52:37] POTENTIALLY.
[02:52:39] >> YES, SO WHAT THEY NEED FROM THE CITY
[02:52:40] COUNCIL IS SOME
[02:52:43] ASSURANCE OR DIRECTION ON A SITE AND
[02:52:44] THAT EVERYONE IS TOGETHER
[02:52:48] OEN THE SITE OR AT LEAST THE MAJORITY OF
[02:52:49] COUNCIL IS TOGETHER
[02:52:52] ON SELECTING THAT SITE. FOR THE
[02:52:53] ALTERNATIVE SITES WE DO HAVE
[02:52:56] THOSE VERY BASIC PRELIMINARY DESIGNS
[02:52:57] THAT WE SHARED WITH YOU
[02:53:00] AT THE OCTOBER 9 MEETING SO THAT WOULD
[02:53:01] BE SUFFICIENT FOR THEM
[02:53:05] TO SEE THE FOOTPRINT AND IT COULD FIT AT
[02:53:06] A PARTICULAR
[02:53:09] LOCATION. SO THAT'S WHAT THEY NEED,
[02:53:10] CERTAINTY BECAUSE AT THE
[02:53:13] MOMENT THEY HAVE $3 MILLIONS IN THE
[02:53:14] PROJECT THAT THEY ARE
[02:53:19] ANXIOUS TO RELEASE AND SHARE WITH OTHER
[02:53:20] PROJECTS IF WE CANT
[02:53:25] MOVE FORWARD.
[02:53:26] >> OKAY. AND TO CITY ATTORNEY'S COMMENTS
[02:53:27] A MOMENT AGO, IN
[02:53:32] THAT SCENARIO, IF WHAT WE HAVE CURRENTLY
[02:53:33] ON A ALTERNATIVE SITE
[02:53:39] IS SUFFICIENT WOULD WE EXPECT THAT THAT
[02:53:40] GRANT WOULD NOT BE
[02:53:42] CANCELED ON APRIL 1 OR DO WE EVEN KNOW
[02:53:43] THAT FOR SURE? IF THEY
[02:53:49] LIKED THE ALTERNATIVE?
[02:53:50] >> SO, IT IS BASED ON A RECOMMENDATION.
[02:53:51] SO, THEY CAME AND DID
[02:53:55] A SITE TOUR INITIALLY WHEN THEY WERE
[02:53:56] DOING THE PRE-GRANT
[02:54:02] INSPECTION OF THE SITES SO THEY DID LOOK
[02:54:03] AT THE SITE AND AREAS
[02:54:08] AROUND THE SITE. AS I SAID IN THE
[02:54:09] REPORT, WE HAVE SPOKEN WITH
[02:54:11] THE GRANT MANAGER. IF HERMOSA BEACH CAN
[02:54:12] IDENTIFY A LOCATION
[02:54:15] TO CAPTURE THE SAME VOLUME OF WATER IN
[02:54:16] THE CURRENT GRANT
[02:54:18] AGREEMENT, AND THERE IS ALSO VEGETATION
Page 39 of 94
[02:54:19] PLANTING REQUIRED UP
[02:54:24] TO 1 ACRE THEY WOULD BE HAPPY WITH THAT
[02:54:25] DIRECTION.
[02:54:29] >> OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THAT ADDITIONAL
[02:54:30] INFORMATION. I WONDER
[02:54:35] IF WE HAVE ANY INFORMATION ON THE MONEY
[02:54:36] THAT IS BEING MADE
[02:54:39] AVAILABLE FOR GRANT FUNDING OF THESE
[02:54:40] KINDS OF PROJECTS IN THE
[02:54:43] STATE, BECAUSE WE UNDERSTAND THAT IF WE
[02:54:44] WERE TO LOSE THE
[02:54:48] CURRENT AWARD THERE IS A POSSIBILITY WE
[02:54:49] COULD COME BACK AT A
[02:54:53] LATER TIME WITH A DIFFERENT PROJECT AND
[02:54:54] REAPPLY FOR GRANT
[02:54:57] FUNDING IN A "SECOND ROUND" POTENTIALLY.
[02:54:58] DO WE HAVE DETAILS
[02:55:05] ABOUT THE LIMIT OF THOSE FUNDS AND
[02:55:06] WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE
[02:55:09] LIKELY TO RUN OUT IN A FIRST ROUND OR IS
[02:55:10] THAT NOT CLEAR? IS
[02:55:15] THERE A POT OF MONEY AND THEN WHEN IT IS
[02:55:16] GONE IT IS GONE?
[02:55:19] >> IT IS [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] FUNDS. IT
[02:55:20] IS LIMITED SO IN THE
[02:55:24] FIRST ROUND THEY DID FUND A LARGE NUMBER
[02:55:25] OF PROJECTS BUT LIKE
[02:55:29] I SAID, THERE ARE OTHER PROJECTS THEY
[02:55:30] WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE
[02:55:32] FUNDED. WE HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF
[02:55:33] THAT FUNDING WRAPPED
[02:55:37] UP AT THE MOMENT ON A PROJECT THAT IF WE
[02:55:38] ARE NOT GOING TO MOVE
[02:55:42] FORWARD THEY LIKE TO DISSOLVE THE
[02:55:43] AGREEMENT SO THEY CAN
[02:55:47] RELEASE THE FUNDS TO OTHER PROJECTS SO
[02:55:48] IT ISN'T A ENDLESS POT
[02:55:51] OF FUNDING, IT IS COMPETITIVE FUNDING.
[02:55:52] WE CAN'T GUARANTEE IF
[02:55:55] WE APPLY FOR THE FUNDING AGAIN WE ARE
[02:55:56] COMPETITIVE BASED ON HOW
[02:55:58] WE PERFORMED UNDER THE CURRENT GRANT
[02:55:59] AGREEMENT, SO THAT'S JUST
[02:56:03] ONE CONSIDERATION. THERE ARE OTHER
[02:56:04] GRANTS PROJECTS THAT COME
[02:56:07] UP, BUT NOT OUT OF THE PROP 1 FUNDING.
[02:56:11] >> OKAY, THANK YOU MADAM MAYOR. I THINK
Page 40 of 94
[02:56:12] I'LL STOP THERE.
[02:56:16] >> ALRIGHT. ALRIGHT. I HAVE ONE
[02:56:17] QUESTION. WE RECEIVED A
[02:56:22] LATE LETTER TODAY FROM REDONDO BEACH
[02:56:23] MAYOR BILL BRAND IN
[02:56:28] RESPONSE TO REQUEST FROM CITY OF HERMOSA
[02:56:29] BEACH TO STUDY THE
[02:56:33] PROJECT FEASIBILITY ON FRANCISCA AND IF
[02:56:34] IT WAS DETERMINED TO
[02:56:41] BE FEASIBLE WOULD THEY ALLOW US TO BUILD
[02:56:42] THE PROJECT THERE AND
[02:56:44] WE RECEIVED THAT RESPONSE LATE TODAY.
[02:56:45] DOES THE CITY MANAGER
[02:56:49] OR CITY ATTORNEY WANT TO GIVE A HIGH
[02:56:50] LEVEL INTERPRETATION OF
[02:56:52] THAT FOR THE BENEFIT OF EVERYONE HERE
[02:56:53] WHO DIDN'T GET A CHANCE
[02:56:56] TO READ IT. IT IS A THREE PAGE LETTER
[02:56:57] ATTACHED AS A
[02:57:00] SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE AGENDA.
[02:57:18] >> MADAM MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, I
[02:57:19] WANTED TO PROVIDE A
[02:57:26] UPDATE. APPROXIMATELY A WEEK OR WEEK AND
[02:57:27] A HALF AGO WE HAD A
[02:57:31] LETTER SENT FROM OUR MAYOR TO THE MAYOR
[02:57:32] OF REDONDO BEACH
[02:57:35] ASKING FOR THEIR APPROVAL TO LOOK AT
[02:57:36] NORTH FRANCISCA AVENUE IN
[02:57:42] REDONDO BEACH AS A ALTERNATIVE LOCATION
[02:57:43] FOR THE INFILTRATION
[02:57:49] PROJECT SO WE RECEIVED THE RESPONSE
[02:57:50] SHORTLY BEFORE YOU ENTERED
[02:57:53] INTO CLOSED SESSION AND THE HIGH LEVEL
[02:57:54] SUMMARY IS REDONDO
[02:57:59] BEACH IS COMMITTED TO WORKING WITH THE
[02:58:00] PARTNERS TO COMPLETE
[02:58:02] PROJECTS THAT HELP PRESERVE AND ENHANCE
[02:58:03] THE BENEFICIAL USES OF
[02:58:06] RECEIVING WATER BODIES AND INSURE
[02:58:07] COMPLIANCE WITH OUR MPDS
[02:58:10] PERMIT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
[02:58:11] THEY REQUEST THAT IF
[02:58:14] THE AGENCIES AND BEACH CITY GROUPS
[02:58:15] COLLECTIVELY AGREE TO FUND
[02:58:24] OR FUND [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] AS A
[02:58:25] POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVE
[02:58:30] PROJECT SITE THE CITY WOULD PROVIDE THE
Page 41 of 94
[02:58:31] RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT
[02:58:33] SAID NEEDED TO PERFORM THE STUDY. THE
[02:58:34] SECOND OF THE 4
[02:58:36] CONDITIONS IS IF THE EXPLORATION OF
[02:58:37] NORTH FRANCISCA AVENUE
[02:58:41] DOES NOT RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE BEACH
[02:58:42] CITIES GROUP OR THE
[02:58:45] CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES NOT AGREE TO
[02:58:46] INDIVIDUALLY AND
[02:58:49] SEPARATELY FUND THE STUDY REDONDO BEACH
[02:58:50] IS FORCED TO CONSIDER
[02:58:54] OTHER COMPLIANCE OPTIONS. ADDITIONALLY,
[02:58:55] THEY REQUEST OUR CITY
[02:59:01] PROVIDE ASSURANCE THAT OTHER ALTERNATIVE
[02:59:02] SITES WITHIN HERMOSA
[02:59:06] BEACH ALSO BE STUDIED TO POSSIBLY MEET
[02:59:07] THE GROUP INFILTRATION
[02:59:11] TARGETS AS IT IS UNKNOWN IF NORTH
[02:59:12] FRANCISCA PROVIDES ENOUGH
[02:59:16] ROOM FOR COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS.
[02:59:17] REDONDO BEACH REQUEST THE
[02:59:21] CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TAKE THE LEAD
[02:59:22] WORKING WITH THE REGIONAL
[02:59:25] BOARD TO NEGOTIATE APPROVAL OF THE
[02:59:26] MODIFIED AND ADDRESS THE
[02:59:29] REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION GOALS AND
[02:59:30] COMPLIANCE DATES. THE
[02:59:33] SHORT SUMMARY.
[02:59:34] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT UPDATE.
[02:59:35] I THINK THAT WAS A
[02:59:37] BENEFIT TO EVERYONE HERE LISTENING. AS
[02:59:38] MENTIONED EARLIER,
[02:59:42] COUNCIL MEMBER FANGARY AND I ARE ON A
[02:59:43] SUBCOMMITTEE TOGETHER
[02:59:48] AND ALL THOUGH IT ISN'T IN THE STAFF
[02:59:49] REPORT, WE FELT IT WAS
[02:59:51] IMPORTANT TO OFFER AN UNUSUAL
[02:59:52] RECOMMENDATION BEFORE PUBLIC
[02:59:57] COMMENT BUT WE FELT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO
[02:59:58] SHARE WITH EVERYONE
[03:00:00] HERE TODAY AND ANYONE WATCHING FROM
[03:00:01] HOME. AS A SUBCOMMITTEE
[03:00:05] CONSISTING OF MYSELF AND COUNCIL MEMBER
[03:00:06] FANGARY, WE HAVE
[03:00:09] REVIEWED YOUR WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS,
[03:00:10] VISITED THE VARIOUS
[03:00:14] PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND MET WITH MANY OF
Page 42 of 94
[03:00:15] YOU PERSONALLY. WE
[03:00:18] HAVE HEARD YOUR CONCERNS AND OUR
[03:00:19] RECOMMENDATION IS AS FOLLOWS:
[03:00:23] OPTION 1, PLACING THE PROJECT ON THE
[03:00:24] GREEN BELT IS NOT
[03:00:27] RECOMMENDED. OPTION 2, PLACING THE
[03:00:28] PROJECT IN A ALTERNATIVE
[03:00:33] LOCATION IN HERMOSA INCLUDING SOUTH PARK
[03:00:34] IS NOT RECOMMENDED BY
[03:00:37] THE SUBCOMMITTEE AT THIS TIME.
[03:00:38] SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE WE LACK
[03:00:42] INFORMATION TO MAKE A INFORMED AND
[03:00:43] PRUDENT DECISION. WE
[03:00:46] RECOMMEND OPTION 3. INITIATING A
[03:00:47] AMENDMENT REVISION OR
[03:00:52] DISSOLUTION OF MEMORANDUM OF
[03:00:53] UNDERSTANDING TO NEGOTIATE A
[03:00:56] SUITABLE SUBSTITUTE PROJECT WITH THE
[03:00:57] CITY PARTNERS. FURTHER,
[03:00:59] WE RECOMMEND DIRECTING STAFF TO WORK
[03:01:00] WITH OUR PARTNERS, OUR
[03:01:04] STATE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, AND THE
[03:01:05] STATE WATER BOARD TO
[03:01:08] SALVAGE EXISTING GRANT FUNDING TO THE
[03:01:09] EXTENT FEASIBLE. WITH
[03:01:14] THAT-
[03:01:16] (APPLAUSE)
[03:01:23] THAT'S JUST TWO PEOPLES RECOMMENDATION
[03:01:24] UP HERE, SO THAT IS NOT
[03:01:29] THE WILL OF THE ENTIRE COUNCIL. WE ARE
[03:01:30] GOING TO WAIT TO GO TO
[03:01:34] A VOTE AFTER WE OPEN UP PUBLIC COMMENT.
[03:01:35] MADAM CLERK.
[03:01:39] >> MADAM MAYOR, I DID HAVE A QUESTION.
[03:01:42] >> ABSOLUTELY.
[03:01:43] >> SO, BASED-TO STAFFING BASED ON THAT
[03:01:44] RECOMMENDATION, AGAIN
[03:01:50] CAN YOU GIVE US A SCENARIO WHAT THAT
[03:01:51] MIGHT LOOK LIKE MOVING
[03:01:53] FORWARD? IN OTHER WORDS WE WOULD LOSE
[03:01:54] THE GRANT FUNDING WOULD
[03:02:03] WE NOT?
[03:02:04] >> THAT IS CORRECT.
[03:02:05] >> WE HAVE TO POTENTIALLY REPAY OUR
[03:02:06] COLLECTIVE CITIES INVOLVED
[03:02:10] HERE-THE WORK THAT HAS BEEN DONE WE LOSE
[03:02:11] THAT AS WELL, RIGHT?
Page 43 of 94
[03:02:14] WE HAVE TO-THERE IS COST ASSOCIATED WITH
[03:02:15] IT, IT IS ONLY FAIR
[03:02:19] THAT WE BASICALLY SAY WHAT THOSE COSTS
[03:02:20] ARE.
[03:02:22] >> THERE MAY BE COST ASSOCIATED WITH
[03:02:23] THAT, I DON'T KNOW WHERE
[03:02:31] THE WORK IS SALVAGEABLE. IT DON'T WANT
[03:02:32] TO SPECULATE WHAT THE
[03:02:36] PARTNER CITIES WILL OR WILL NOT DEMAND
[03:02:37] OF US.
[03:02:39] >> BUT, SO THERE IS A LOT OF-
[03:02:44] >> UNKNOWNS.
[03:02:45] >> UNKNOWNS TO THIS.
[03:02:46] >> RIGHT.
[03:02:47] >> THINGS THAT ARE COMPLETELY BEYOND OUR
[03:02:48] CONTROL IN TERMS OF
[03:02:52] WHAT OUR PARTNER CITIES DECIDE TO DO,
[03:02:53] WHAT THE REGIONAL BOARD
[03:02:57] DECIDES TO DO IN RELATION TO THE
[03:02:58] CONVERSATION WITH THEM BY
[03:03:02] APRIL 1. AM I MISSING OTHER PARTS HERE
[03:03:03] THAT--? THOSE ARE THE
[03:03:11] TWO MAIN THINGS THAT WE WILL BE
[03:03:12] CONFRONTED WITH, CORRECT?
[03:03:17] >> I THINK-LIKE I SAID, WE HAVE KATHLEEN
[03:03:18] HERE TO TALK ABOUT
[03:03:23] NEXT STEPS AND WHAT THAT WILL LOOK LIKE
[03:03:24] IF WE ROLL BACK THE
[03:03:28] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] AND HAVE TO LOOK AT
[03:03:29] VARIOUS SCENARIOS, SO
[03:03:31] THERE IS ASSOCIATED COSTS WE HAVE TO DO
[03:03:32] ADDITIONAL MODELING SO
[03:03:37] I'LL LET YOU SPEAK TO THAT.
[03:03:38] >> SO, DEPENDING ON ULTIMATE LOCATION OF
[03:03:39] THE PROJECT AND THE
[03:03:43] SIZE OF THE PROJECT THERE IS A POTENTIAL
[03:03:44] TO HAVE TO REVISE THE
[03:03:48] REASONABLE ASSURANCE ANALYSIS AND THE
[03:03:49] EWP FOR A PROJECT SO
[03:03:54] THERE WILL BE COST ASSOCIATED WITH THAT.
[03:03:55] THE GROUP HAS TO
[03:03:59] RERUN THE MODEL AND PRODUCE A REVISED
[03:04:00] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS]
[03:04:05] UNDER THE CURRENT PERMIT BY JUNE 2021 SO
[03:04:06] YOU WILL BE INCURRING
[03:04:09] THAT AT THAT POINT IN TIME. NOW IT MIGHT
[03:04:10] HAVE BEEN A FAIRLY
Page 44 of 94
[03:04:13] NOMINAL EFFORT HAD THE PROJECTS REMAINED
[03:04:14] AS THEY WERE BUT IF
[03:04:18] YOU SHUFFLE THE PROJECTS OR CHANGE THE
[03:04:19] LOCATIONS YOU HAVE TO
[03:04:22] RERUN THE MODELING TO SHOW THAT THE NEW
[03:04:23] PROJECTS STILL ACHIEVE
[03:04:25] THE SAME EFFECT. SO, THERE IS COST
[03:04:26] ASSOCIATED WITH THAT.
[03:04:29] >> AND THEN, BUT IF--IN TERMS OF THE
[03:04:30] MAYOR'S MEMO BASICALLY
[03:04:36] SAYS THAT WE WOULD SHOULDER THE COST FOR
[03:04:37] THE CONSTRUCTION? IN
[03:04:43] OTHER WORDS NOT JUST THE LEAD BUT WE PAY
[03:04:44] FOR IT?
[03:04:46] >> THE WAY I UNDERSTAND THAT IS THEY ARE
[03:04:47] ASKING HERMOSA BEACH
[03:04:49] TO FUND THE COST OF THE PRELIMINARY
[03:04:50] ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION
[03:04:53] NEEDED TO DETERMINE WHETHER
[03:04:54] FRANCISCA-LIKE THE SAME COSTS
[03:04:58] >> WHAT COULD THOSE COSTS BE?
[03:05:05] >> THE SAME WORK FOR THE GREEN BELT.
[03:05:08] >> $40 THOUSAND.
[03:05:09] >> $230 THOUSAND.
[03:05:11] >> $230 THOUSAND. THAT IS IMPORTANT
[03:05:12] NUMBER TO HAVE. THANK
[03:05:15] YOU.
[03:05:17] >> COUNCIL MEMBER MASSEY.
[03:05:18] >> MADAM MAYOR, IF I MIGHT. KATHLEEN I
[03:05:19] HAVE A QUICK QUESTION
[03:05:22] FOR YOU AND WANTED TO MAKE SURE I'M
[03:05:23] CLEAR FROM-WE JUST GOT THE
[03:05:25] LETTER FROM REDONDO BEACH THIS EVENING.
[03:05:26] I WANT TO MAKE SURE
[03:05:31] I'M CLEAR. MY UNDERSTANDING IS ALL
[03:05:32] REDONDO BEACH IS SAYING
[03:05:35] THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT UNDER CERTAIN
[03:05:36] CONDITIONS THEY PERMIT
[03:05:38] US TO STUDY FRANCISCA STREET AS A
[03:05:39] POTENTIAL LOCATION. THEY
[03:05:42] ARE NOT SAYING THIS IS A LOCATION FOR
[03:05:43] THE PROJECT.
[03:05:46] >> CORRECT.
[03:05:47] >> OKAY. KATHLEEN, MY QUESTION FOR YOU
[03:05:48] IS, FORGET WHICH
[03:05:51] DOCUMENT IT IS AND MAYBE THE EWIMP BUT
[03:05:52] FOR THIS PARTICULAR
Page 45 of 94
[03:05:57] WATERSHED AND PROJECT, I RECALL A
[03:05:58] NOTATION FRANCISCA STREET
[03:06:05] COULD BE CONSIDERED.
[03:06:06] >> WE HAD A ALTERNATIVE SITE RETAINED
[03:06:07] FOR A SITE ON THE OTHER
[03:06:11] SIDE OF HERONDO STREET. FRANCISCA WASN'T
[03:06:12] THE LOCATION BUT
[03:06:17] THAT APPROXIMATELY AT THE SAME LOCATION,
[03:06:18] SO FROM THAT
[03:06:22] STANDPOINT IF THE PROJECT WERE THE SAME
[03:06:23] SIZE AND
[03:06:30] FRANSISCA WITH THE SAME HYDRAULIC
[03:06:31] CHARACTERISTIC YOU COULD
[03:06:34] POTENTIALLY NOT HAVE TO REVISE ASSUMING
[03:06:35] YOU CAN MEET THE DEAD
[03:06:38] PP LINE.
[03:06:39] >> THE SECOND QUESTION IS DID WE DO
[03:06:40] REMODELING OF FRANCISCA
[03:06:43] STREET? IS THERE EXISTING MODELING?
[03:06:46] >> NO. BUT THE MODELING DONE HAS TO DO
[03:06:47] WITH LOCATION ALONG
[03:06:53] THAT STORM DRAIN WHERE IT DIVERSION
[03:06:54] WOULD BE. I GUESS IT
[03:06:58] DIVERSION IS IN A SIMILAR SPOT AND SO
[03:06:59] THAT PART OF THE
[03:07:02] HYDRAULICS WOULD BE OKAY. THE LEVEL AT
[03:07:03] WHICH THE PROJECT WERE
[03:07:05] MODELED WAS JUST 10 PERCENT CONCEPT SO
[03:07:06] FAIRLY HIGH LEVEL SO
[03:07:12] FOR THE SENSITIVITY FOR WHAT WAS DONE I
[03:07:13] THINK IF IT IS THE
[03:07:17] SAME SIZE A THAT PROPOSED GREEN BELT AND
[03:07:18] CAN HANDLE THE SAME
[03:07:21] VOLUME OF WATER IT WOULD BE COMPARABLE
[03:07:22] AND YOU WILL NOT HAVE
[03:07:25] TO REQUEST REVISION AT THIS TIME TO
[03:07:26] SHIFT TO FRANCISCA.
[03:07:31] >> THIS MAY BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE
[03:07:32] ENGINEER. IN THE EVENT IF
[03:07:38] A FRANCISCA STREET DOESN'T HAVE THE
[03:07:39] VOLUME THAT THE GREEN BELT
[03:07:41] PROJECT IN THE-
[03:07:45] >> SAME PERMEABILITY. YOU NEED BOTH.
[03:07:49] >> CAN YOU-IS IT FEASIBLE TO SAY
[03:07:50] FRANCISCA STREET TAKES 70
[03:07:55] PERCENT OF THE VOLUME AND BUILD A
[03:07:56] PROJECT ON IN THE GREEN BELT
Page 46 of 94
[03:08:00] OR IN HER MOSEY BEACH THAT TAKES 30
[03:08:01] PERCENT OF THE VOLUME YOU
[03:08:04] HAVE TO CAPTURE IN THE STORM DRAIN?
[03:08:06] >> IF IT COMES OFF THE SAME DIVERSION
[03:08:07] LOCATION PROBABLY IT IS
[03:08:10] OKAY TO HAVE IT-AT SOME POINT YOU RERUN
[03:08:11] THE MODEL IN A YEAR
[03:08:18] AND A HALF BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO DO THAT
[03:08:19] AND IF YOU HAVE
[03:08:21] SHUFFLING IT ISN'T A BIG DEAL.
[03:08:23] >> MY LAST QUESTION IS, AES IS A KNOWN
[03:08:24] CONTAMINATED SITE AND
[03:08:32] THAT CONTAMINATION AS I UNDERSTAND IT IS
[03:08:33] CLOSE TO THE NORTHERN
[03:08:35] SIDE OF THE PLANT SO NEAR FRANCISCA AND
[03:08:36] HERONDO STREET. MY
[03:08:41] UNDERSTANDING IS ONE OF THE CRITERIA THE
[03:08:42] REGIONAL BOARD USE TO
[03:08:45] EXCLUDE A LOCATION IS PROXIMITY TO KNOWN
[03:08:46] CONTAMINATION BECAUSE
[03:08:51] WHEN YOU PECULATE WATERS [INAUDIBLE
[03:08:52] COMMENTS]
[03:08:56] >> THAT'S RIGHT.
[03:08:58] >> DO YOU HAVE INFORMATION TO IMPART ON
[03:08:59] THAT ON TERMS WHETHER
[03:09:01] THAT WILL AFFECT THE ANALYSIS?
[03:09:03] >> IF YOU FELT THE SITE TO BE
[03:09:04] CONTAMINATED IT WOULD CAUSE
[03:09:07] PROBLEMS AND HAVE IT FIND A WAY TO
[03:09:08] REMEDIATE IT TO INFILTRATE.
[03:09:13] THE REGIONAL BOARD WILL NOT ENCOURAGE TO
[03:09:14] INFILTRATE THERE. A
[03:09:20] SIMILAR PROBLEM WE ARE HAVING A THE
[03:09:21] TORRANCE AIRPORT WITH A
[03:09:25] INFILTRATION PROJECT WHERE THEY HAVE TO
[03:09:26] MODEL TO SHOW THEY
[03:09:28] WILL NOT MOVE A CONTAMINATE PLOOM TO
[03:09:29] INFILTRATE FROM THE
[03:09:37] PENINSULA AND SPENT QUITE A BIT OF WORK
[03:09:38] TRYING TO DO THAT BUT
[03:09:41] THEY ARE NOT INFILTRATING ON IT TOP. YOU
[03:09:42] CAN NOT INFILTRATE
[03:09:48] ON TOP OF THE POLLUTANTS. THE REGIONAL
[03:09:49] BOARD WILL NOT ISSUE A
[03:09:53] PERMIT AND YOU HAVE TO GET THE
[03:09:54] GROUNDWATER AND STORMWATER
[03:09:56] GROUP FOR THAT TYPE OF A SCENARIO.
Page 47 of 94
[03:10:00] >> THANK YOU.
[03:10:01] >> ONE LAST QUESTION,S MADAM MAYOR.
[03:10:02] MADAM CITY MANAGER, DID I
[03:10:07] MISS HEAR IN TERMS OF THE MAYOR'S LETTER
[03:10:08] THAT HE'S ALSO
[03:10:15] REQUIRING THAT WE ALSO LOOK AT ALTERNATE
[03:10:16] SITES. SO, THAT IS
[03:10:22] SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD PAY FOR?
[03:10:23] EXPLORING-IS IT UNDER THE
[03:10:28] STANDARD COST SHARING? AGAIN, THEY HAVE
[03:10:29] TO AGREE TO IT, WOULD
[03:10:33] THEY NOT?
[03:10:34] >> THEY HAVE TO AGREE TO IT AND IT'S NOT
[03:10:35] ARTICULATED IN THAT
[03:10:38] CONDITION, CONDITION NUMBER 3 WHETHER IT
[03:10:39] IS EXCLUSIVELY AT OUR
[03:10:43] COST. BUT IT DOES REQUEST THAT WE
[03:10:44] PROVIDE ASSURANCE AND OTHER
[03:10:50] ALTERNATIVE SITES IN OUR OTHER THAN CITY
[03:10:51] WOULD ALSO BE
[03:10:55] STUDIED. IT DOESN'T REFERENCE COST
[03:10:56] THERE.
[03:10:57] >> THANK YOU.
[03:10:58] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR.
[03:11:00] >> COUNCIL MEMBER FANGARY.
[03:11:02] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. SUMMARIZED
[03:11:03] THE SUBCOMMITTEE
[03:11:08] RECOMMENDATION AND WANTED TO MAKE QUICK
[03:11:09] COMMENTS. ONE IS THAT
[03:11:11] THE RECOMMENDATION THAT WE MADE WAS
[03:11:12] BASED ON SPECIFICALLY
[03:11:14] GOING OUT THERE TO THE PROPERTY STANDING
[03:11:15] IN THE FRONT DOOR OF
[03:11:17] THE PROPERTY ON THE GREEN BELT AND GOING
[03:11:18] TO SOUTH PARK AND
[03:11:20] RESPONDING HOURS OVER THE WEEKEND AND
[03:11:21] SEEING AND HEARING THE
[03:11:25] INPUT WE RECEIVED FROM YOU WHICH WE
[03:11:26] APPRECIATE. I THINK THERE
[03:11:31] IS A LOT OF THINGS THAT STILL NEED TO BE
[03:11:32] EXPLORED AND WHERE
[03:11:35] THE RECOMMENDATION COMES FROM. I WANT TO
[03:11:36] BRIEFLY TALK ABOUT
[03:11:38] THE INPUT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY ABOUT
[03:11:39] THE GRANT AND BASED ON
[03:11:41] THE DIALOGUE THAT THE MAYOR AND I HAD
[03:11:42] OUR REPRESENTATIVES IN
Page 48 of 94
[03:11:47] SACRAMENTO. WE REACHED OUT TO STATE
[03:11:48] SENATOR BEN ALLEN AND
[03:11:52] STAFF AND [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] AND HIS
[03:11:53] STAFF BASICALLY ASKING
[03:11:54] THEM AS OUR SMALL CITY HERE HERMOSA
[03:11:55] BEACH TO CONNECT WITH THE
[03:11:59] FOLKS IN SACRAMENTO RELATED TO THE WORK
[03:12:00] OF THE STATE BOARD TO
[03:12:03] ASSIST IN THE PROCESS TO EXPLAIN THE
[03:12:04] REASON WHY WE ARE
[03:12:07] REEVALUATING THE LOCATION AND EVEN
[03:12:08] THOUGH WE DONT HAVE A
[03:12:10] COMMITMENT TO GIVE A ANSWER WE HAVE A
[03:12:11] COMMITMENT TO WORK WITH
[03:12:13] US AND REPRESENT US AT THE STATE LEVEL
[03:12:14] TO HELP US. I'M NOT
[03:12:18] USUALLY THE MOST OPTIMISTIC IN THE ROOM
[03:12:19] BUT A LITTLE MORE
[03:12:23] OPTIMISTIC FOR THE GRANT FUNDING. APRIL
[03:12:24] 1 COMES AROUND WE
[03:12:26] COULD GET RECOMMENDATION FROM THE GRANT
[03:12:27] MANAGER TO HIS BOSS OR
[03:12:31] BOSSES TO SAY I DONT HAVE THE
[03:12:32] INFORMATION THAT NEEDED FROM
[03:12:35] HERMOSA BEACH AND MY RECOMMENDATION IS
[03:12:36] TO REVOKE THE GRANT AND
[03:12:38] COULD VERY WELL BE IT GRANT IS REVOKED.
[03:12:39] BASED ON THE
[03:12:45] INFORMATION WE PROVIDED AND ON A
[03:12:46] SPECIFIC REPRESENTATION TO
[03:12:48] OUR REPRESENTATIVES IN SACRAMENTO AND
[03:12:49] THE STATE BOARD THE
[03:12:53] REASON FOR THE CHANGE AND REASON FOR THE
[03:12:54] ADDITIONAL TIME WE
[03:12:56] NEED IS PREMISED ON THE INPUT FROM THE
[03:12:57] COMMUNITY AND ISSUES
[03:13:00] RAISED AND THE FACT WE ARE WORKING WITH
[03:13:01] REDONDO BEACH AND
[03:13:05] PARTNERS EVALUATING OPTIONS. I HAVE A
[03:13:06] LITTLE MORE OPTIMISTIC
[03:13:11] VIEW THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR THE GRANT TO
[03:13:12] REMAIN OR FOR THE
[03:13:13] GRANT EXTENSION TO EXTEND PAST APRIL 1
[03:13:14] TO ALLOW US TO CONTINUE
[03:13:18] DIALOGUE WITH REDONDO BEACH SO THAT IS
[03:13:19] WHERE MY AND MAYOR
[03:13:23] RECOMMENDATION IS COMING FROM. WE
Page 49 of 94
[03:13:24] HAVEN'T GIVEN UP ON THE
[03:13:27] GRANT OPPORTUNITY BUT THAT IS WHAT OUR
[03:13:28] RECOMMENDATION IS BASED
[03:13:30] ON.
[03:13:31] >> THANK YOU. DID WE HAVE ANOTHER
[03:13:32] COMMENT? ALRIGHT. MADAM
[03:13:36] CLERK.
[03:13:37] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. I ONLY HAVE
[03:13:38] ABOUT 10 SPEAKER
[03:13:44] CARDS. SHALL I CALL 3 AT A TIME, 5 AT A
[03:13:45] TIME?
[03:13:48] >> 3 AT A TIME AND IF YOU ARE IN THE
[03:13:49] AUDIENCE AND HAVEN'T
[03:13:51] FILLED OUT A SPEAKER CARD, IT IS REALLY
[03:13:52] HELPFUL IF YOU DO.
[03:13:55] YOU DON'T HAVE TO, BUT IT HELPS US STAY
[03:13:56] ORDERLY IN THE MEETING
[03:13:59] SO IF YOU DON'T MIND TAKING A MINUTE AND
[03:14:00] GRABBING A CARD WHILE
[03:14:05] OTHER SPEAKERS COME FORWARD.
[03:14:06] >> MAX RILEY. MICHAELA WEBB. I BELIEVE
[03:14:07] MICHAELA SPOKE
[03:14:21] ALREADY [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] AND LUKE
[03:14:22] BUCKHAGAN.
[03:14:23] >> MAX, YOU ARE UP.
[03:14:26] >> HI I'M MAX RILEY. IF YOU DIDN'T
[03:14:27] ALREADY KNOW THAT. I LIVE
[03:14:32] AT 105410TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. IT
[03:14:33] IS ABOUT PROSPECT AND
[03:14:37] AVIATION. FIRST I WANT TO THANK THE
[03:14:38] COMMUNITY BEING REALLY
[03:14:41] INVOLVED IN THE ISSUE BECAUSE THERE ARE
[03:14:42] A LOT OF ISSUES HERE
[03:14:45] WHERE WE DON'T HAVE THE CHAMBERS FULL
[03:14:46] LIKE TODAY AND HERE WE
[03:14:48] HAVE ALL THE VOICES FROM ALL THE SIDES
[03:14:49] COMING TOGETHER TO FIND
[03:14:52] A GOOD SOLUTION SO REALLY HAPPY ABOUT
[03:14:53] THAT. I WILL SAY THE
[03:14:55] BAD WORDS. I SUPPORT THE INFILTRATION
[03:14:56] PROJECT. SO, THERE ARE
[03:15:01] QUITE A FEW MERITS TO THE PROJECT THAT
[03:15:02] CAN CAUSE IT TO BE GOOD
[03:15:04] FOR OUR CITY. BEACHES IN THE NAME OF
[03:15:05] HERMOSA BEACH AND I
[03:15:09] THINK WE REALLY NEED TO FOCUS ON THE
[03:15:10] BEACH PART OF OUR CITY,
Page 50 of 94
[03:15:12] OBVIOUSLY PARKS AND GREEN SPACES ARE
[03:15:13] VERY IMPORTANT PARTS OF
[03:15:16] ANY CITY AROUND THE WORLD. HOWEVER, HERE
[03:15:17] I THINK THE MOST
[03:15:20] IMPORTANT GREEN SPACE MIGHT BE OUR BEACH
[03:15:21] AND OCEAN SO WE NEED
[03:15:23] TO FOCUS ON PROTECTING THAT BEFORE WE
[03:15:24] WRECK THE PARKS. THE
[03:15:28] GREEN BELT IS OBVIOUSLY A GOOD CHOICE AS
[03:15:29] TALKED ABOUT BY THE
[03:15:33] STUDIES MADE PREVIOUSLY, HOWEVER THE
[03:15:34] GREEN BELT IS A MASSIVE
[03:15:38] PLACE PEOPLE USE FOR WALKS, WALKING DOGS
[03:15:39] OTHER THINGS SO DONT
[03:15:42] THINK THIS IS THE BEST SPOT. I BELIEVE
[03:15:43] THE BEST SPOT FOR THE
[03:15:45] INFILTRATION PROJECT IS SOUTH PARK.
[03:15:46] MERITS OF THE SITE OF
[03:15:50] SOUTH PARK. IT IS A BIG OPEN SPACE I
[03:15:51] PROBABLY WON'T EFFECT
[03:15:54] UTILITIES NEARLY AS MUCH THEN AT SOUTH
[03:15:55] PARK. THERE IS A TON
[03:15:58] OF ENTRANCES WHICH IS GOOD FOR TRAFFIC
[03:15:59] MANAGEMENT BECAUSE WE
[03:16:01] MIGHT BE ABLE TO USE A ROTATING SCHEDULE
[03:16:02] FOR TRUCKS TO COME
[03:16:04] FROM DIFFERENT DIRECTION TO LIMIT
[03:16:05] TRAFFIC TO EACH AREA. IT IS
[03:16:10] OVERALL CONTAINED AREA. UNLIKE THE GREEN
[03:16:11] BELT IT ISN'T
[03:16:15] TOUCHES TONS OF HOUSES AND THE CENTRAL
[03:16:16] AREA IS A GOOD
[03:16:20] DISTANCE. IT HAS LOWER LIQUEFACTION RISK
[03:16:21] THEN OTHER AREAS
[03:16:24] CONSIDERED AND MOST IMPORTANTLY IS WE
[03:16:25] HAVE A SIMILAR PROJECT
[03:16:28] AT BOLIVAR PARK AND KNOW THAT THE
[03:16:29] PROJECT CAN WORK WELL. IF
[03:16:32] YOU LOOK AT BOLIVAR BARK YOU SEE THAT IT
[03:16:33] TURNED OUT WELL IN A
[03:16:35] NUMBER OF WAYS. IT IS BEAUTIFUL IF YOU
[03:16:36] LOOK IT UP AND GO TO
[03:16:38] IMAGES IT JUST LOOKS LIKE A PARK. YOU
[03:16:39] CAN'T TELL. IT HAS 4.5
[03:16:45] STARS ON GOOGLE SO I THINK THAT IS A
[03:16:46] GOOD PARK. OVERALL I
[03:16:51] THINK A PARK PROJECT IS GREAT. SOME
Page 51 of 94
[03:16:52] PROBLEMS WITH THIS ARE
[03:16:55] PROBLEMS WITH WHERE THE KIDS MIGHT PLAY
[03:16:56] DURING THE PROJECT AND
[03:16:58] TO DEAL WITH THIS I SUGGEST
[03:16:59] IMPLEMENTATION OF LIMITING THE
[03:17:02] PROJECT TO A SMALL AREA SO KIDS CAN USE
[03:17:03] THE PLAYGROUND OR
[03:17:07] POSSIBLY OTHER AREAS WHILE THE PROJECT
[03:17:08] IS GOING ON. AGAIN,
[03:17:11] SECOND PEOPLE COMPLAINED ABOUT TRAFFIC
[03:17:12] TO DEAL WITH THIS. I
[03:17:14] MIGHT SUGGEST AS SAID BEFORE THE
[03:17:15] IMPLEMENTATION OF MULTIPLE
[03:17:19] ROUTES ROTATING. I BELIEVE SOUTH PARK IS
[03:17:20] THE BEST PLACE FOR
[03:17:24] THE ISSUE AND THERE ARE MASSIVE
[03:17:25] FINANCIAL BURDENS THAT COME
[03:17:28] WITH NOT DOING THE PROJECT AND THROUGH
[03:17:29] THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
[03:17:30] THE SOLUTIONS I BELIEVE WE CAN CREATE
[03:17:31] THE BEST HERMOSA BEACH
[03:17:33] FOR EVERYONE.
[03:17:34] >> THANK YOU. GARRETT.
[03:17:37] >> SO, MY NAME IS GARRETT [INAUDIBLE
[03:17:38] COMMENTS] I WANT TO THANK
[03:17:42] YOU GUYS SO MUCH FOR WEIGHING OUT ALL
[03:17:43] OUR CONCERNS. I SELDOM
[03:17:48] SPEAK UP OR SHOW UP TO COMMUNITY
[03:17:49] MEETINGS UNLESS I FEEL
[03:17:52] PASSIONATE ABOUT A ISSUE BUT THIS TOPIC
[03:17:53] TO MAKE THE OCEAN
[03:17:55] CLEANER, TO INSURE THE WATER ISN'T
[03:17:56] CONTAMINATED I NEVER
[03:17:58] IMAGINE WE WOULD BE DISCUSSING A TOPIC
[03:17:59] LIKE THIS. WE NEED
[03:18:03] THIS STORM DRAIN. NOW, I UNDERSTAND YOUR
[03:18:04] CONCERNS ABOUT
[03:18:08] TRAFFIC, FUMES AS WELL AS THE COMPANY
[03:18:09] BEING SUSPICIOUS AND
[03:18:14] LAND VALUE, BUT INSTEAD OF ATTEMPTING TO
[03:18:15] CANCEL PROJECTS LET'S
[03:18:18] WORK TOGETHER TO COME UP WITH FEASIBLE
[03:18:19] SOLUTIONS THAT WORK TO
[03:18:21] EASE EVERYBODY'S CONCERNS. FOR TRAFFIC,
[03:18:22] I WOULD SUGGEST THAT
[03:18:24] THE COMPANY AS WELL AS THE CITY SHOULD
[03:18:25] COME UP WITH A
Page 52 of 94
[03:18:28] EFFICIENT TRAFFIC PLANS HOW TO MINIMIZE
[03:18:29] TRAFFIC ON SURFACE
[03:18:31] STREETS INSURING THE LEAST AMOUNT OF
[03:18:32] PEOPLE WILL BE EFFECTED.
[03:18:35] I FEEL 4 ALTERNATING ROUTES SO TRUCKS
[03:18:36] DON'T SAY THE SAME ROUTE
[03:18:43] EVERY DAY WOULD BE BENEFICIAL. THESE
[03:18:44] ROUTES ALSO COINCIDE
[03:18:50] WITH STREET SWEEPING SCHEDULES.
[03:18:51] SECONDLY, ABOUT THE FUMES, I
[03:18:54] PROPOSE THAT TRUCKS WOULD BE ONLY
[03:18:55] PERMITTED TO IDLE ON CYPRESS
[03:19:01] BETWEEN 6 AND 8 STREET AND A SMALL
[03:19:02] SECTION OF 6 STREET FROM
[03:19:05] VALLEY TO CYPRESS ALL NON RESIDENTIAL
[03:19:06] AREAS WITH WAREHOUSES
[03:19:10] SURROUNDING THEM. FINALLY, NOT FINALLY,
[03:19:11] SORRY, ABOUT THE
[03:19:14] VALIDITY OF THE COMPANY, WE NEED TO LOOK
[03:19:15] NO FURTHER THEN BULL
[03:19:19] VAR PARK THAT THEY TRANSFORMED TO A AREA
[03:19:20] GOOD FOR FAMILIES, IT
[03:19:24] IS GOOD FOR PEOPLE AND GOOD FOR
[03:19:25] CHILDREN. FINALLY, ABOUT THE
[03:19:29] LAND VALUE, A SMALL FILTER WILL NOT
[03:19:30] EFFECT THE LAND VALUE AS
[03:19:38] THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT IS
[03:19:39] TEMPORARY. I TELL YOU, A
[03:19:43] DIRTY UNCLEAN COAST LINE WILL. WE ARE
[03:19:44] FORTUNATE TO HAVE
[03:19:47] INCREDIBLY VALUABLE PROPERTIES IN THE
[03:19:48] AREA BECAUSE OF OUR
[03:19:51] PRISTINE BEACHES. IF WE INSURE OUR OCEAN
[03:19:52] REMAINS CLEAN WE CAN
[03:19:54] INSURE OUR PROPERTY EVALUATES IN HER
[03:19:55] MOSA BEACH REMAINS AT THE
[03:20:00] CURRENT LEVEL. PARENT, I ENCOURAGE YOU
[03:20:01] TO THINK OF US, THE
[03:20:03] NEXT GENERATION INSTEAD OF YOU AND YOUR
[03:20:04] VESTED INTEREST. I'M
[03:20:08] VERY HOPEFUL OF YOU TO THINK ABOUT HOW
[03:20:09] MUCH CLEANER OUR WATER
[03:20:11] WILL BE FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS GREAT
[03:20:12] COMMUNITY AND LASTLY, I
[03:20:16] BEG OF YOU TO THINK OF THE BENEFITS OF
[03:20:17] CLEANER WATER AND A
[03:20:19] SAFER BEACH FOR OUR COMMUNITY THRIVES
Page 53 of 94
[03:20:20] OFF OF THIS. THANK YOU
[03:20:23] VERY MUCH.
[03:20:24] >> THANK YOU, GARRETT. LUKE AND MADAM
[03:20:25] CLERK IF YOU--
[03:20:31] >> HOLD ON ONE SECOND. I DON'T KNOW WHAT
[03:20:32] THE OUTBURST WAS BUT
[03:20:35] EXPECT SOMETHING LIKE THAT WONT HAPPEN
[03:20:36] AGAIN AND BEFORE YOU
[03:20:38] GET STARTED, MADAM CLERK DO YOU MIND
[03:20:39] STATING THE NEXT THREE
[03:20:43] NAMES?
[03:20:44] >> ABSOLUTELY. MARION PEARL, MARIA HOSS
[03:20:45] AND EZRA COHEN.
[03:20:49] >> MY NAME IS LUKE BALKHAGAN AND LIVED
[03:20:50] IN HERMOSA BEACH ALL MY
[03:20:54] LIFE AND THE TOWN IS BUILT AROUND ONE
[03:20:55] THING THE BEACH.
[03:20:58] KEEPING THE BEACH CLEAN IS HARD. MOST
[03:20:59] OPTIONS ARE NOT COST
[03:21:01] EFFECTIVE, NOT PERMANENT OR TOO
[03:21:02] EXPENSIVE. IN THE SITUATION
[03:21:05] WE IS A CHANCE TO DO SOMETHING PERMANENT
[03:21:06] AND HOPEFULLY AT
[03:21:08] SOUTH PARK. UNFORTUNATELY THERE IS
[03:21:09] CONCERNS ABOUT THE
[03:21:13] INFILTRATION PROJECT AND THERE IS
[03:21:14] CONCERN CONSTRUCTION MAY BE
[03:21:16] TEMPORARY INCONVENIENT AND WE MISS THE
[03:21:17] CHANCE TO HAVE A SAFER
[03:21:20] AND CLEANER BEACH AND CITY AS A WHOLE.
[03:21:21] NOT ONLY HAS THE CITY
[03:21:25] RECEIVED GRANTS TO CONSTRUCT THE STORM
[03:21:26] DRAIN WHICH FILTERS OUT
[03:21:29] POTENTIALLY HARMFUL DEBRIS AND RUN OFF,
[03:21:30] BUT ALSO IF WE DONT
[03:21:35] BUILD IT WILL BE FINED UP TO $37
[03:21:36] THOUSAND A DAY AND THE
[03:21:39] MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY WILL BE FORCED
[03:21:40] TO FOOT THE BILL IF
[03:21:42] THE DRAIN ISN'T CONSTRUCTED UNLESS
[03:21:43] ANOTHER SOLUTION IS FOUND.
[03:21:48] THERE ARE COMPLAINTS ABOUT TRAFFIC IT IS
[03:21:49] IMPORTANT TO
[03:21:51] RECOGNIZE THE AREA SURROUNDING SOUTH
[03:21:52] PARK HAS LITTLE TRAFFIC
[03:21:55] AS IS AND MANY ROUTES EXIST. THE
[03:21:56] CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES COMING
Page 54 of 94
[03:21:59] TO AND FRO FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE
[03:22:00] AND SINCE THE ROAD MAY
[03:22:05] BE SHUT DOWN DURING CONSTRUCTION CARS
[03:22:06] MAY NOT BE DRIVING ON
[03:22:08] THE ROAD DURING CONSTRUCTION INSTEAD
[03:22:09] THERE WILL BE TRUCKS AND
[03:22:11] MAY BE LESS TRUCKS ON THE ROAD THEN CARS
[03:22:12] SO URGE ALL YOU TO
[03:22:16] MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION. HELP PRESERVE A
[03:22:17] BEAUTIFUL BEACH AND
[03:22:21] WONDERFUL COMMUNITY. THERE WILL BE
[03:22:22] SACRIFICE EITHER WAY. ON
[03:22:24] ONE SIDE CONSTRUCTION AND INCONVENIENCE
[03:22:25] BUT GET A CLEANER AND
[03:22:28] SAFER BEACH, ON THE OTHER SIDE MAY HAVE
[03:22:29] TO PAY A HUGE BAY
[03:22:31] DAILY WHILE RECEIVING NOTHING IN RETURN.
[03:22:32] MAKE THE RIGHT
[03:22:35] CHOICE. THANK YOU.
[03:22:36] >> THANK YOU, LUKE. NEXT UP. GO AHEAD
[03:22:37] MARION.
[03:22:46] >> GOOD EVENING. MARION PEARL, I LIVE ON
[03:22:47] 447, 2 STREET. I
[03:22:54] SPENT ALL DAY NOT GOING TO WORK READING
[03:22:55] ALL THE COMMENTS,
[03:22:58] PUTTING SOMETHING ON AND THEN TONIGHT I
[03:22:59] HEAR-I WANT TO RECAP
[03:23:04] WHAT I HEAR TODAY AND IN THE PAST FROM
[03:23:05] THE CITY COUNCIL AND
[03:23:09] MRS. MORRIS. BASICALLY 2013, 14, 15
[03:23:10] THERE HAD TO BE
[03:23:15] INFILTRATION PROJECT TO CLEAN THE OCEAN,
[03:23:16] WHICH IS GREAT, HAS
[03:23:19] TO BE DONE. THE CITY FROM REDONDO BEACH,
[03:23:20] TORRANCE HERMOSA
[03:23:24] BEACH WERE SITTING TOGETHER IN 2012, 13,
[03:23:25] 14. REDONDO BEACH 50
[03:23:31] PERCENT STORMWATER GOING DOWN THE DRAIN.
[03:23:32] TORRANCE OVER 30
[03:23:36] PERCENT, HERMOSA BEACH, 10 PERCENT.
[03:23:37] REDONDO BEACH SAY THEN WE
[03:23:43] HAVE TOO MUCH ON OUR PLATE, WITH WHY
[03:23:44] DONT YOU HERMOSA BEACH
[03:23:47] YOU GOT A NICE GREEN BELT, TWO FOOTBALL
[03:23:48] FIELDS, 2 MILLION 400
[03:23:55] THOUSAND GALLONS CAN INJECT IN THERE,
[03:23:56] THIS IS DONE DEAL. YOU
Page 55 of 94
[03:23:59] TAKE IT ON, WE HAVE VAST LAND OVER 50
[03:24:00] PERCENT OUR STORMWATER,
[03:24:06] WE HAVE TOO MUCH ON THE PLATE. WHY DONT
[03:24:07] YOU DO IT, WE GIVE
[03:24:11] YOU THE GRANT AND THAT IS HOW THIS MOU
[03:24:12] STARTED. THE HERMOSA
[03:24:15] BEACH CITY COUNCIL SAY, YEAH, WE JUST
[03:24:16] SETTLED WITH THIS WHOLE
[03:24:20] THING AND HAVE NOTHING TO DO, LET'S DO
[03:24:21] IT. WE SIGN A MOU. 2
[03:24:29] MILLION 400 GALLONS OF STORMWATER INJECT
[03:24:30] IF INTO THE GREEN
[03:24:33] BELT, IT PROBABLY ISN'T A BIG DEAL.
[03:24:34] MARCH 2018 WE GOT THE
[03:24:39] FIRST LETTER, WE ALL WOKE UP TO IT, WE
[03:24:40] HAVE [INAUDIBLE
[03:24:45] COMMENTS] LIVING AT THE GREEN BELT WHAT
[03:24:46] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS]
[03:24:48] INVESTIGATED. THE WATER LEVEL IS TOO
[03:24:49] HIGH, SO I DON'T THINK
[03:24:51] ANY AGENCY WOULD PRESSURE ON YOU TO
[03:24:52] BUILD THIS WOULD WANT YOU
[03:24:56] TO GO FORWARD AND BUILD THIS WHICH IS
[03:24:57] FAULTY AND YOU WILL
[03:25:01] HAVE LAWSUITS IN THE FUTURE GOING ON SO
[03:25:02] I THINK THAT'S WHY MS
[03:25:08] MAYOR AND YOU ALREADY SAW THAT AND YOU
[03:25:09] SAY NO, LET'S NOT DO
[03:25:12] IT. LET'S WAKE UP TO THAT. THERE IS NO
[03:25:13] SPACE FOR THIS BIG
[03:25:18] PROJECT ON THE GREEN BELT OR SOUTH PARK.
[03:25:19] WE HAVE TO TELL
[03:25:23] REDONDO IT IS MOSTLY YOUR WATER, YOU GOT
[03:25:24] THOSE VAST PIECE OF
[03:25:29] LAND, YOU TAKE CARE OF IT. THAT'S ALL.
[03:25:30] THANK YOU.
[03:25:35] >> THANK YOU.
[03:25:51] >> I LIKE TO THANK THE HERMOSA BEACH
[03:25:52] SUBCOMMITTEE, MAYOR, AND
[03:25:55] COUNCIL MEMBER FANGARY FOR TALKING TO
[03:25:56] REDONDO BEACH AND
[03:26:04] RECOMMENDING OPTION NUMBER 3. WE REALLY
[03:26:05] REALLY PROGNOSIS
[03:26:09] APPRECIATE THIS. I HOPE THE REST THE
[03:26:10] CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
[03:26:12] RECOMMEND OPTION 3 AS WELL. THE
[03:26:13] RESIDENTS OF HERMOSA BEACH WE
Page 56 of 94
[03:26:18] HAVE BEEN FIGHTING THE STORMWATER
[03:26:19] PROJECT FOR ONE WHOLE YEAR.
[03:26:24] A PROJECT OF THIS MAGNITUDE SHOULD HAVE
[03:26:25] BEEN RESEARCHED
[03:26:28] THOROUGHLY. SINCE THE VERY BEGINNING AND
[03:26:29] THE RESIDENTS SHOULD
[03:26:34] HAVE BEEN INFORMED AHEAD OF TIME AND
[03:26:35] EVERYBODY KNOWS WE HAVE
[03:26:37] BEEN REPEATING THESE OVER AND OVER AND
[03:26:38] OVER BUT I THINK WE ARE
[03:26:41] FINALLY REACHING TO THE POINT WHERE
[03:26:42] HOPEFULLY YOU GUYS
[03:26:45] RECOMMEND OPTION NUMBER 3. THANK YOU.
[03:26:52] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE HAVE ANOTHER
[03:26:53] NAME MENTIONED?
[03:26:56] >> YES, EZRA COHEN.
[03:26:58] >> GOOD EVENING.
[03:27:03] >> MY NAME IS EZRA COHEN AND I LIVED IN
[03:27:04] THE SOUTH BAY
[03:27:08] THROUGHOUT FOR THE LAST 7 OR 8 YEARS.
[03:27:09] SO, THERE ARE MANY
[03:27:13] DISASTER CONSEQUENCES IF THE CITY
[03:27:14] COUNCIL CHOOSES TO IMPLEMENT
[03:27:19] OPTION NUMBER 3 AS THE CITY LAWYER HAS
[03:27:20] SAID BEFORE. FIRST OF
[03:27:23] ALL, THE GRANT MONEY EXPIRES ON APRIL 1
[03:27:24] AND WE HAVE THE GRANT
[03:27:27] MONEY RIGHT NOW. BY REFUSING TO
[03:27:28] IMPLEMENT THIS PROGRAM IN
[03:27:32] EFFORT OF THE GREEN BELT OR SOUTH PARK,
[03:27:33] WE WILL WILLINGLY GIVE
[03:27:37] UP THE GRANT MONEY THAT WAS A ONCE IN A
[03:27:38] LIFE TIME THING THAT
[03:27:39] HERMOSA BEACH CAN IMPLEMENT TO HELP PUT
[03:27:40] IN MUCH NEEDED
[03:27:45] INFILTRATION SYSTEM. WE ARE MADE TO
[03:27:46] REPAY THE OTHER BEACH
[03:27:50] CITIES FOR THE MONEY THEY HAVE GIVEN US,
[03:27:51] WHICH COULD AMOUNT TO
[03:27:54] INNUMERABLE COSTS NO CALCULATED YET.
[03:27:55] OPTION 3 RESTS UPON THE
[03:28:00] FACT OF FRANCISCO STREET AS A POSSIBLE
[03:28:01] PLACE BUT REDONDO BEACH
[03:28:09] HASN'T APPROVED FRANCISCA STREET AND
[03:28:10] MOST LIKELY WILL NOT BE
[03:28:13] APPROVED BECAUSE OF CONTAMINATION. WE
[03:28:14] MUST APPROVE OPTION 1
Page 57 of 94
[03:28:20] OR 2 AND OPTION 1 ISN'T FEASIBLE BECAUSE
[03:28:21] OF THE PEOPLE IN THE
[03:28:28] ROOM THAT LIVE MERE IT. WE MUST USE
[03:28:29] SOUTH PARK. I KNOW
[03:28:32] PEOPLE IN THE ROOM FROM SOUTH PARK
[03:28:33] AGAINST THE PROPOSAL AND
[03:28:35] THERE ISN'T WIDE SPREAD DISAPPROVAL OF
[03:28:36] SOUTH PARK. SOUTH PARK
[03:28:41] MIGHT NOT BE THE MOST DESIRABLE LOCATION
[03:28:42] BECAUSE OF THE
[03:28:44] PLAYGROUND AND PARK, THE CONSEQUENCES OF
[03:28:45] NOT PUTTING IN OPTION
[03:28:48] 1 OR 2 ARE MUCH WORSE. BY 2021 WE HAVE
[03:28:49] TO PAY $37 THOUSAND A
[03:28:56] DAY BECAUSE OF THE FEDERAL CLEAN WATER
[03:28:57] ACT SO WE MUST
[03:28:59] IMPLEMENT SOUTH PARK, IT IS WIDE OPEN
[03:29:00] SPACE THAT IS A GREAT
[03:29:02] PLACE TO PUT THIS AND LIKE THE ENGINEER
[03:29:03] HAD SAID EARLIER, WE
[03:29:06] COULD SPREAD IT OUT TO DIFFERENT
[03:29:07] LOCATIONS SO WE MUST
[03:29:10] IMPLEMENT SOUTH PARK.
[03:29:17] >> JAVIER HAAS AND BRIAN HILLGERS.
[03:29:27] >> THANK YOU. MARK, YOU ARE UP.
[03:29:31] >> JAVIER.
[03:29:42] >> EVENING.
[03:29:44] >> GOOD EVENING. I'M JAVIER HAAS. WE ARE A COMMUNITY THAT
[03:29:54] HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS FOR A YEAR. WE WEREN'T NOTIFIED.
[03:30:05] EVERYBODY KEEPS WONDERING WHY WEREN'T WE NOTIFIED SOONER ABOUT
[03:30:10] THIS PROJECT THE. I'M HEARING DATES GOING BACK TO 2010, 2011,
[03:30:16] 2012, 2013. IT IS 2019 NOW. I FOUND OUT ABOUT IT AND WE FOUND
[03:30:23] OUT ABOUT IT MARCH 28TH, 2019, A YEAR WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON
[03:30:31] THIS. THERE WASN'T SUFFICIENT TRANSPARENCY. WE RESEARCHED AND
[03:30:43] LOOKED AT THIS A LOT OF TIME AND EFFORT ON OUR TIME AND OUR DIME.
[03:30:47] WHAT WE WOULD LIKE IS OPTION NO. 3. WE REALLY APPRECIATE, AGAIN,
[03:30:53] COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY AND ARMATO'S EFFORTS RESEARCHING AS WELL ON
[03:31:03] THEIR OWN. RESEARCHING AS A COMMUNITY. WE ARE A BIG PART OF THE
[03:31:07] ENVIRONMENT. WE NEED TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT AND NEED AN
[03:31:12] INFILTRATION PROJECT. IN MY OPINION SOUTH PARK DOESN'T MAKE
[03:31:17] SENSE TOO CLOSE TO PEOPLE AND GREENBELT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE
[03:31:20] EITHER. IT IS TOO CLOSE TO PEOPLE. WE HAVE TO HAVE AN
[03:31:24] INFILTRATION PROJECT MY HOPE AND PRAYERS ARE WITH FRANCISCA.
[03:31:29] THAT IS, AGAIN, WHAT WE HAVE BEEN PUSHING FOR. I'M GRATEFUL FOR
[03:31:33] REDONDO BEACH PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN INVOLVED CITY COUNCIL PEOPLE
[03:31:38] AND MAYOR BRAND AS FAR AS THAT. I'M SURE YOU HEARD THE RESPONSE
[03:31:42] FROM THE PEOPLE WHO ARE HEARTENED. WE ARE HEARTENED BY ALL OF
Page 58 of 94
[03:31:46] THAT WORK. OPTION NO. 3, THAT WOULD WORK THE BEST. AND I THINK,
[03:31:51] IN OUR OPINION, AND IN THE OPINION OF MANY OTHER PEOPLE. THANK
[03:31:55] YOU SO MUCH.
[03:31:56] >> THANK YOU, BRIAN?
[03:32:02] >> I FEEL LIKE JOHNNY CASH.
[03:32:05] >> THANK YOU FOR HAVING THIS FORUM FOR US TO TALK AND
[03:32:09] COMMUNICATE ABOUT THINGS. I, FIRST OF ALL, WANT TO THANK THE
[03:32:13] FIRST RESPONDERS EVERY TIME. I LIKE THAT WITH MY MEETINGS HERE.
[03:32:17] IT IS MY THIRD MEETING COMING HERE AND GREAT JOB AT THE ST.
[03:32:23] PATRICK'S PARTY. CLYDESDALE WERE A HIT. I HEARD THINGS TODAY.
[03:32:31] I'M ASHAMED IT DIDN'T HAPPEN EARLIER. WE ARE LOOKING AT AN
[03:32:34] ALTERNATIVE SITE. UNTIL I HEARD THIS, I PUT IN MY NOTES YOU HAVE
[03:32:39] A+ ON CLYDESDALE. COLLECTIVELY, YOU GOT AN F ON WHAT WE ARE
[03:32:45] TRYING TO DO HERE AS A COMMUNITY. THIS IS THE THIRD TIME I HAVE
[03:32:47] BEEN HERE, AND I FEEL WE ARE FURTHER BEHIND TODAY THAN WE WERE
[03:32:51] LAST TIME. IT JUST BOTHERS ME ITSELF. WHEN I -- OUR LAST TIME
[03:32:56] WE WERE HERE, I WENT BACK AND LOTS OF THE FOLKS SAID THEY ARE
[03:32:59] LISTENING AND ASKING FOR LOCATIONS AND WHERE ELSE CAN WE DO
[03:33:03] ALTERNATIVES? A RED FLAG CAME ON TO ME. YOU KNOW WHAT? I
[03:33:07] NEGOTIATE PARTNERSHIPS AND MAJOR DEALS ALL THE TIME. I LOVE IT.
[03:33:11] APPEASEMENT NEGOTIATION ISSUE APPEASING THE OTHER SIDE. TELL US
[03:33:17] WHERE YOU LIKE TO BE. IT BUILDS TIME. THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE
[03:33:21] THE RIGHT OPPORTUNITY. MAYBE IT WAS TOTALLY LEGIT. I SAW
[03:33:25] SOMETHING THE LAST TWO WEEKS AGO. IT MADE ME RECYCLE EASY READER
[03:33:32] QUICKER THAN NORMAL. IT TALKED ABOUT DIFFERENT THINGS FOR THIS
[03:33:35] ARTICLE. THIS IS FOR OLYMPIC-SIZED SWIMMING POOLS UNDERGROUND.
[03:33:42] THIS IS HOLDING RAINWATER FROM EVERYWHERE. FIRST FLUSH IS THE
[03:33:49] LAST FLUSH. THAT IS WHY I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THIS CALLED A
[03:33:52] BROWN BELT. RESIDENTS CAN IMPEDE A PROJECT. A SPEED BUMP
[03:33:57] IMPEDES PEOPLE. WE HAVE TO WORK ON THIS TOGETHER NOT JUST HAVE
[03:34:01] US GET IN THE WAY. I HEARD GOOD THINGS TONIGHT BUT SURPRISED IT
[03:34:05] TOOK SO MUCH LONGER. ONE OTHER THING. THERE ISSUES ON F GRADE
[03:34:10] DURING WEATHER ON THE BEACH. THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE. WE HAVE TO
[03:34:14] DO THAT. IRONICALLY, THE FIRST TIME I WAS AT THE MEETING, THERE
[03:34:17] WAS TWO AREAS FOR AN F MEETING FOR AN F ON THE BEACH. SOUTH
[03:34:22] REDONDO AND 28 MANHATTAN BEACH. WE HAVE TO FIX THIS UP. LET'S
[03:34:28] NOT TRY TO BE LIKE A BRILLIANT POLITICIAN RIGHT NOW THROWING OUT
[03:34:33] ONE IDEA AND SCARING THE WORLD. WE WON'T BE DEAD IN 12 YEARS.
[03:34:39] LET'S FIGURE IT OUT THE RIGHT WAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[03:34:42] >> YAY.
[03:34:43] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MADAM CLERK?
[03:34:46] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. I HAVE SEVERAL CARDS HERE WHERE
[03:34:50] PEOPLE INDICATED OR CHECKED THAT THEY EITHER OPPOSED OR SUPPORTED
[03:34:55] THIS ITEM, BUT THEY DID NOT WISH TO SPEAK BUT I THINK THE CARDS
[03:35:00] MIGHT CONFUSE A FEW PEOPLE. SO COULD I ASK THAT THOSE PEOPLE,
[03:35:06] ANY OF THEM WHO DO WANT TO SPEAK COME UP AND JUST LET ME KNOW?
[03:35:10] >> WELL, HOLD ON ONE SECOND. I CAN ASK OUR CITY MANAGER OR
Page 59 of 94
[03:35:15] ATTORNEY IF SOMEONE DOESN'T WANT TO SPEAK BUT WROTE ON THE CARD
[03:35:21] DOES THE CLERK READ THAT INTO THE RECORD?
[03:35:25] >> I THINK MISUNDERSTOOD. THEY CHECKED OPPOSED OR SUPPORT
[03:35:29] UNDER IF THEY DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT THEY ACTUALLY DO WISH TO
[03:35:33] SPEAK.
[03:35:34] >> OKAY. SORRY.
[03:35:35] >> WE MIGHT HAVE TO CLARIFY THE CARD.
[03:35:37] >> YES. THANKS FOR THAT. READ OUT TO THE AUDIENCE.
[03:35:40] >> IF YOU WANT TO SPEAK, LET ME KNOW. ARCADIA KING,
[03:35:44] BARBARA ELLMAN, AND KATHY STEMIC, AND ETHAN MIBOO AND CAROL
[03:35:53] ANDREW O'KOWSKI.
[03:35:55] >> I DIDN'T WANT TO SPEAK.
[03:35:57] >> ALL RIGHT. SO --
[03:35:58] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[03:35:59] >> IF WE CALLED YOUR NAME, PLEASE STEP UP TO THE MICROPHONE
[03:36:02] AND GO AHEAD.
[03:36:03] >> IN THE MEANTIME, SHALL I CALL THE NEXT FORWARD, PLEASE?
[03:36:07] >> YES, PLEASE. STEP FORWARD WHILE WE DO THAT.
[03:36:10] >> CHRIS PRENNER, RACHEL WALLACE, AND JESSICA GUHEEN.
[03:36:17] >> CITY COUNCIL, HI. KATHY STEMIC. I DON'T HAVE GLASSES
[03:36:23] AND DIDN'T SEE WHAT I CHECKED OFF BUT SAW OPPOSED LOUDLY AND
[03:36:27] CLEARLY THIS FAR AWAY. I DIDN'T PLAN ON SPEAKING TONIGHT. I
[03:36:31] APOLOGIZE FOR ALL OF THIS. THE MAIN THING I WANT TO SAY IS THAT,
[03:36:34] ACTUALLY, I BELIEVE IN YOU. YOU KNOW HOW I FEEL. YOU KNOW HOW
[03:36:39] WE FEEL. BUT I ACTUALLY BELIEVE IN YOU MORESO TONIGHT THAN I DID
[03:36:45] SIX WEEKS AGO OR SIX MONTHS AGO AND A YEAR AGO.
[03:36:48] I UNDERSTAND THAT WE NEED TO SHARE THE BURDEN. CHRISTY
[03:36:54] SPOKE ABOUT THAT. THOSE WERE KEY WORDS I HEARD TONIGHT.
[03:36:58] SHARING, COMPROMISING. WE CAN'T CARRY ALL OF THIS BURDEN. WE
[03:37:02] ALL WANT CLEAN WATER, OF COURSE WE DO. WE LOVE OUR OCEAN AND OUR
[03:37:08] CITY. I REALLY BELIEVE THAT IF WE DISSOLVE THIS, THAT YOU ALL
[03:37:12] HAVE THE POWER TO GO AND NEGOTIATE FOR US. LOOK. WE HAVE A BAD
[03:37:17] DEAL. WE CAN ALL ADMIT THAT. IT JUST ISN'T A GOOD DEAL, BUT YOU
[03:37:22] GUYS CAN GO BACK AND RENEGOTIATE FOR US.
[03:37:25] I -- I FULLY BELIEVE THAT. WITH FRANCISCA, THEY CAN CARRY
[03:37:31] WHAT? 70 OR 80% OF THAT BURDEN, AND WE TAKE 20 OR 25% OF IT? I
[03:37:37] THINK WE MIGHT BE OKAY WITH THAT. WE CAN'T CARRY 100% OF THE
[03:37:42] BURDEN. WE CAN TALK ABOUT MONEY AND RAMIFICATIONS AND GRANTS. I
[03:37:47] FIND GRANT MONEY FOR A LIVING. THAT IS WHAT I DO FOR COLLEGE NOT
[03:37:51] THIS BIG OF A SCALE, BUT THE MONEY IS OUT THERE. IT DOES GET
[03:37:55] REPLENISHED. THERE WILL BE MORE MONEY FOR US, AND WE DO HAVE
[03:37:58] PEOPLE UP IN SACRAMENTO THAT WILL FIGHT FOR US. YOU HAVE TO
[03:38:02] FIGHT FOR US NOW. I KNOW YOU CAN DO IT. I FULLY BELIEVE IT.
[03:38:06] YOU HAVE THE POWER TO RENEGOTIATE FOR US, SO JUST PLEASE VOTE FOR
[03:38:11] NO. 3 AND GO IN AND TAKE SOME NAMES AND RENEGOTIATE FOR US. YOU
[03:38:16] GUYS CAN DO IT. THANK YOU.
[03:38:17] >> THANK YOU. CHRIS GRUNTER.
Page 60 of 94
[03:38:22] >> I WOULD LIKE TO JUST SAY ECHO WHAT SHE SAID RIGHT THERE.
[03:38:30] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[03:38:31] >> SHE SAID IT REALLY WELL. I'M NOT SURE HOW THIS PROJECT
[03:38:34] CAME SO FAR DOWN THIS PATH WITH HERMOSA BEARING THE FULL WEIGHT
[03:38:40] OF THE PLACEMENT OF THE LOCATION OF THIS PROJECT BEING ALL IN
[03:38:45] HERMOSA WHEN WE HAVE SO LITTLE SPACE. IT JUST DOESN'T SEEM TO
[03:38:50] MAKE SENSE CONSIDERING HOW MUCH THE OTHER CITIES ARE CONTRIBUTING
[03:38:59] IN TERMS OF THEIR WASTE WATER. BUT I DO REALLY THINK THAT IF WE
[03:39:06] CAN GO WITH OPTION 3, THEN YOU GUYS HAVE PUT TOGETHER WITH MAYOR
[03:39:13] BRAND, THAT WOULD BE THE BEST OPTION FOR US TO MOVE THIS ALONG
[03:39:18] AND TRY AND TAKE AWAY THIS HUGE INDUSTRIAL PROJECT THAT SEEMS TO
[03:39:24] BE COMING BACK TO SOUTH HERMOSA EVERY FEW YEARS IN SOME FORM OR
[03:39:31] ANOTHER. THAT WOULD BE GREAT. I WOULD URGE YOU TO VOTE FOR THE
[03:39:34] OPTION 3 AND SEE IF WE CAN NEGOTIATE A -- SOMETHING THAT WILL
[03:39:42] WORK BETTER FOR OUR CITY AND FOR OUR RESIDENTS. THANK YOU.
[03:39:46] >> THANK YOU, CHRIS. RACHEL?
[03:39:51] >> HI. SO I'M ONE OF THE FAMILIES THAT MY FRONT DOOR AND
[03:39:57] BEDROOM WINDOW IS DIRECTLY ON THE GREENBELT. WHERE YOU ARE
[03:40:00] SITTING IS WHERE THE PROPOSED MACHINERY WILL START, AND I WILL
[03:40:04] WAKE UP TO THAT EVERY MORNING. MY HUSBAND WORKS FROM HOME
[03:40:08] TWO DAYS A WEEK. I HAVE THREE LITTLE KIDS. I'M IMPACTED AND
[03:40:12] WILL BE IMPACTED IN MY HOME AND MY CHILDREN GO TO SCHOOL WITH
[03:40:15] SOME OF YOU AND CHILDREN GO TO SCHOOL WITH A LOT OF THE RESIDENTS
[03:40:19] IN THE COMMUNITY. I FEEL VERY STRONGLY ABOUT THIS. I'M VERY
[03:40:23] CONCERNED ABOUT THE NEXT GENERATION. I'M NOT HERE FOR MY
[03:40:26] INTEREST BUT MY CHILDREN'S INTEREST AS WELL. A GREAT
[03:40:29] INFILTRATION PROJECT. IN A SENSE, WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING TO
[03:40:32] CLEAN OUT THE WATER. WEIR HAS BEEN PROPOSED. I URGE THE OTHERS
[03:40:39] TO PLEASE CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDATION. WE DON'T AGREE WITH THE
[03:40:43] TWO LOCATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN SUGGESTED. OUTSIDE MY FRONT DOOR IS
[03:40:47] NOT OKAY AND THE SACRIFICE MY FAMILY WILL HAVE TO MAKE FOR THAT
[03:40:51] TO HAPPEN IS SIMPLY IMPOSSIBLE. SOUTH PARK, I CAN TELL YOU AS
[03:40:56] MOTHER OF TWO NINE-YEAR OLDS AND A FOUR-YEAR OLD, I CAN'T TAKE
[03:41:00] THEM TO SOUTH PARK AND LET THEM RUN FREELY ON THE PLAYGROUND WITH
[03:41:05] HUGE TRUCKS AND A CONSTRUCTION SITE NEXT TO ME. THAT IS
[03:41:10] NEGLIGENT AS A MOTHER. IF I'M ON TOP OF MY KIDS AT THE PARK,
[03:41:16] IT'S NO FUN FOR ME OR THEM. -- GOOD NEIGHBOR NEWBORN NURSERY IS
[03:41:25] ON THE GREENBELT. WE ARE THINKING ABOUT THE NEXT GENERATION. I
[03:41:28] COME FROM NEW ZEALAND. WE ARE VERY BIG ON THE ENVIRONMENT THERE.
[03:41:33] ONE OF MY QUESTIONS FOR YOU TO CONSIDER IS WITH THE FRANCISCA
[03:41:37] SITE. IT IS ABOUT CLEANING UP THE CONTAMINATION. I KNOW IT IS
[03:41:41] SOMETHING WE HAVE DONE IN NEW ZEALAND AND DO, DO. I DON'T THINK
[03:41:45] CONTAMINATION SHOULD BE USED TO SCARE PEOPLE OFF USING THAT SITE
[03:41:49] AT ALL. IT SHOULD BE AN OPTION THAT SHOULD BE CLEARLY LOOKED AT.
[03:41:53] WE CAN CLEAN UP CONTAMINATION. IT WILL COST MORE AND THERE WILL
[03:41:57] BE CONS FOR THAT, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT, THAT SHOULD BE RULED
[03:42:03] OUT. I URGE YOU TO THINK ABOUT AS A PARENT IF I MAKE A MISTAKE
Page 61 of 94
[03:42:06] OR MY KIDS MAKE A MISTAKE, WE LEARN FROM THAT AND CHANGE COURSE.
[03:42:11] IF WE CONTINUE TO MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE, WE CAN SAY THAT WE ARE
[03:42:15] BOOKING A FOOL. THERE IS THAT SAYING THAT I UNDERSTAND THAT I
[03:42:19] FEEL A MISTAKE HAS BEEN MADE ABOUT THE SITES THAT HAVE BEEN
[03:42:22] CONSIDERED. I THINK YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CHANGE AND
[03:42:25] ADVOCATE AND FIGHT FOR US AND RENEGOTIATE AS THE LAST LADY SAID,
[03:42:30] TO MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION. I REALLY HOPE YOU GUYS CAN DO THAT.
[03:42:34] THANK YOU.
[03:42:35] >> THANK YOU, RACHEL.
[03:42:36] >> JESSICA. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE THE NEXT 3, MADAME
[03:42:49] CLERK? YOU WANT YOUR HUSBAND TO DO IT IN YOUR PLACE?
[03:42:52] >> NO. [INDISCERNIBLE].
[03:42:54] >> ALL RIGHT. ADAM, YOU CAN STEP UP TO SPEAK, IF YOU WOULD
[03:42:58] LIKE. PLEASE ALLOW THE CLERK TO NAME OFF THE NEXT THREE NAMES.
[03:43:03] >> SURE. JESSICA WORSHICK, JOHN GARDNER, AND RON ELLMAN.
[03:43:10] >> I WILL WAIT.
[03:43:11] >> YOU WANT TO WAIT?
[03:43:12] >> YEAH.
[03:43:13] >> JESSICA, THE OTHER JESSICA. JESSICA WITH A K.
[03:43:17] [LAUGHING].
[03:43:20] >> GOOD EVENING.
[03:43:21] >> GOOD EVENING.
[03:43:22] >> WOW. I HAVE THOUGHT SO MUCH ABOUT THIS AND WRITTEN SO
[03:43:25] MANY NOTES. I WANT TO START OUT BY SAYING THANK YOU SO MUCH TO
[03:43:28] THE COUNCILMEMBERS WHO TOOK THE TIME TO COME TO SOUTH PARK AND
[03:43:32] MEET WITH SOME OF US OVER THE PAST WEEKEND AND HAVE TAKEN OUR
[03:43:36] MANY PHONE CALLS. IT IS SO AMAZING TO HEAR THAT, THAT WAS
[03:43:41] IMPACTFUL FOR YOU. WE HAVE BEEN LIVING WITH THIS FOR A YEAR. I
[03:43:44] WILL SAY WHEN I GOT THE STAFF REPORT LAST FRIDAY, IT WAS LIKE
[03:43:48] GROUND HOG DAY ALL OVER AGAIN. WE WERE HERE A YEAR AGO. THE
[03:43:52] PUBLIC CLEARLY DOES NOT SUPPORT IT IN SOUTH PARK OR THE
[03:43:58] GREENBELT. WE HAVE SPENT A YEAR EXAMINING THIS. NOW WE ARE BACK
[03:44:01] HERE AT SQUARE 1. I DO THINK, IN TALKING WITH SO MANY OF MY
[03:44:05] NEIGHBORS, THAT THEY WOULD SUPPORT SEVERAL SMALLER PROJECTS,
[03:44:10] OPTION 3. WE ARE ALL IN FAVOR OF CLEAN OCEANS. NO ONE DOES NOT
[03:44:15] WANT UNCLEAN OCEANS. I TAKE A FRONT TO THE FACT PEOPLE STAND UP
[03:44:20] HERE AND SAY WE ARE OPPOSED TO CLEAN BEACHES AND WATER. WE LOVE
[03:44:24] OUR LITTLE CITY AND WANT TO KEEP IT WITH THE SAME CHARACTER IT
[03:44:28] HAS, BUT SEEING THAT STAFF REPORT WAS SO ALARMING. WHAT WE HAVE
[03:44:32] HEARD FOR A YEAR IS THAT WE ARE SO SORRY AS THE COUNCIL AND STAFF
[03:44:36] THAT WE HAVE NOT BEEN FULLY TRANSPARENT. WE ARE GOING TO DO
[03:44:39] EVERYTHING IN OUR POWER TO BE MORE TRANSPARENT. I HAVE READ THAT
[03:44:43] IN THE EASY READER AND HEARD THAT AT EVERY MEETING I HAVE
[03:44:46] ATTENDED AND YET IT HAS BEEN RADIO SILENCE FROM STAFF TO SEE
[03:44:51] SOUTH PARK IS SUDDENLY THIS RECOMMENDED SITE WHEN THERE HAVE NOT
[03:44:56] BEEN ANY STUDIES DONE AT SOUTH PARK AND NO INFORMATION GATHERED.
[03:45:00] EVEN WHEN THE LOCATION WAS GREENBELT, YOU HAD TETRO TECH OUT
Page 62 of 94
[03:45:03] THERE AND COUNCIL AND STAFF OUT THERE AND YOU DID A FULL
[03:45:06] PRESENTATION TO LET THE PEOPLE KNOW. NONE OF THAT HAS BEEN DONE
[03:45:09] AT SOUTH PARK. IT HAS JUST NOT BEEN EXAMINED AS A SITE. WE JUST
[03:45:14] FOUND OUT TODAY THAT REDONDO, RIGHT BEFORE YOU GOT HERE, THAT
[03:45:18] THEY ARE WILLING TO TALK TO US. THEY ARE WILLING TO HAVE
[03:45:21] DIALOGUE WITH US. THEY ARE WILLING TO MAYBE TAKE ON PART OF THE
[03:45:24] PROJECT. ISN'T THAT WORTH EXPLORING? I FEEL WHEN YOU GUYS LOOK
[03:45:28] OUT HERE AT US, ALL YOU ARE SEEING OR WHAT WE HAVE HEARD FOR THE
[03:45:33] PAST YEAR, YOU SEE DOLLAR SIGNS. WE HEAR GRANT MONEY AND $37,000
[03:45:38] A DAY WE MIGHT POTENTIALLY GET FINED TWO YEARS DOWN THE ROAD. WE
[03:45:43] DON'T KNOW THAT WILL HAPPEN AND THAT WE CAN'T WORK WITH REDONDO
[03:45:48] TO COME UP WITH SMALLER PROJECTS AND SHARE THIS BURDEN AND CHANGE
[03:45:51] THAT AROUND AND THAT WE CAN STILL MEET THAT DEADLINE. I KNOW
[03:45:55] LOTS OF PEOPLE HAVE REACHED OUT TO ELEANOR SUCHI'S OFFICE AND
[03:46:01] THEY TOLD EVERYONE THEY WILL BE ABLE TO WORK WITH US. I IMPLORE
[03:46:05] YOU TO EXHAUST ALL OPTIONS. JESSICA GUHEEN SAID THIS SO WELL THE
[03:46:10] OTHER NIGHT. HAVE YOU EXHAUSTED ALL OPTIONS BEFORE YOU PUT THIS
[03:46:14] CRAZY PROJECT, WHO KNOWS WHAT THE IMPACTS WILL BE, IN THE MIDDLE
[03:46:17] OF OUR AMAZING LITTLE TOWN? THANK YOU GUYS, AGAIN, FOR COMING
[03:46:21] DOWN TO SOUTH PARK AND MEETING WITH US AND TAKEN THE TIME YOU
[03:46:24] HAVE TAKEN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
[03:46:27] >> ALL RIGHT. I THINK WE HAD JOHN NEXT.
[03:46:30] >> GOOD EVENING. JOHN GARDNER HERE. THERE IS A REASON WHY
[03:46:35] WHITNEY HOUSTON SANG THE WORDS "I BELIEVE THAT THE YOUNG CHILDREN
[03:46:42] ARE OUR FUTURE." I THINK SHE SPOKE WITH WISDOM. I UNDERSTAND
[03:46:46] WHAT THEIR WORDS MEAN. THESE YOUNG PEOPLE HIT IT SPOT-ON. NO
[03:46:50] ONE WANTS THIS PROJECT, BUT IN THE END, WE HAVE TO SITE AN
[03:46:54] INFILTRATION PROJECT IN HERMOSA. THERE IS NO WAY AROUND IT. AS
[03:46:59] THE MAYOR STATED, WE HAVE TO SHARE OR CONTRIBUTE OUR -- TAKE CARE
[03:47:04] OF OUR BURDEN AT THE VERY LEAST; RIGHT? THERE IS NO WAY OTHER
[03:47:07] CITIES WILL SAY WE WILL TAKE THAT. NOW WE WILL TAKE HERMOSA'S
[03:47:12] SHARE, ESPECIALLY SINCE WE SIGNED THIS AGREEMENT. IT IS ONE WAY
[03:47:16] OR THE OTHER COME. BY THE TIME THIS THING IS ALL SAID AND DONE,
[03:47:19] WE HAVE TO SITE A PROJECT IN HERMOSA, WHICH IS THE BIG ONE
[03:47:25] HANDLING THE WHOLE LOAD FROM TORRANCE AND REDONDO OR SMALL ONE.
[03:47:30] JUST HERMOSA'S LOAD. THERE WILL BE A PROJECT IN HERMOSA BEACH.
[03:47:35] THERE IS NO TWO WAYS AROUND IT. WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT FROM THE
[03:47:38] PERSPECTIVE WHICH IS THE REALITY, YOU HAVE TO DETERMINE WHICH IS
[03:47:41] THE BEST SITE IN HERMOSA TO SITE THIS PROJECT. WE HAVE TO DO IT
[03:47:45] ANYWAY REGARDLESS. REALLY, THE ONLY OBVIOUS LOCATION AS YOUNG
[03:47:50] PEOPLE POINTED OUT IS SOUTH PARK. I DON'T LIKE THIS ANYMORE THAN
[03:47:53] ANYONE ELSE. AS ONE LADY SAID, WE HAVE A BAD DEAL, BUT IT IS
[03:47:58] WHAT IT IS. WE WON'T BE ABLE TO GET OUT OF IT. WE SIGNED THIS
[03:48:01] AGREEMENT WITH ALL OF THE OTHER CITIES. NOT SURE EVERYONE
[03:48:04] UNDERSTANDS THAT, BUT EVERY CITY HAS TO AGREE TO LET US OUT OF
[03:48:08] THIS -- THE FACT WE SITED THIS PROJECT. THAT MEANS TORRANCE AND
[03:48:14] REDONDO AND MANHATTAN BEACH AND LA COUNTY FLOOD DISTRICT ALL HAVE
Page 63 of 94
[03:48:19] TO SAY, OH, YEAH. WE WILL LET YOU NEGOTIATE WITH REDONDO BEACH
[03:48:24] NO INDICATION THAT TORRANCE OR LA COUNTY OR MANHATTAN BEACH HAS
[03:48:30] NO INDICATION OF LETTING HERMOSA OUT OF IT. IN REALITY, THEY
[03:48:34] WON'T LET THEM OUT OF IT. HERMOSA IS THE OUTFALL. WE WILL DO
[03:48:39] IT. THEY WILL SAY YOU RENEGED ON IT. IT IS YOUR PROBLEM. WE
[03:48:43] HAVE TO SITE THE PROJECT ANYWAY OR BE COMPLETELY, YOU KNOW, OVER
[03:48:47] JUST, YOU KNOW, TOTALLY, TOTALLY SCREWED. WE CAN'T KICK THIS
[03:48:51] DOWN THE ROAD ANY FURTHER. THERE HAS TO BE A PROJECT IN HERMOSA
[03:48:55] ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. SOUTH PARK IS REALLY THE ONLY LOGICAL
[03:48:59] CHOICE. ALL THESE PROJECTS GO IN PARKS BECAUSE PARKS PROVIDE THE
[03:49:03] NECESSARY SPACE THAT YOU NEED TO CONSTRUCT A PROJECT OF THIS
[03:49:08] SITE.
[03:49:09] SO -- AGAIN, WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF TIME. RIGHT? TWO YEARS
[03:49:12] BEFORE THIS THING HAS TO BE DONE AND TAKES A YEAR TO CONSTRUCT
[03:49:15] THIS THING AND YOU HAVE TO DO OTHER STUDIES. NO USE IN KICKING
[03:49:19] THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD FURTHER. WE HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION AND
[03:49:22] MAKE THE RIGHT ONE. IT HAS TO BE AT SOUTH PARK. THANK YOU FOR
[03:49:26] YOUR TIME.
[03:49:27] >> THANK YOU. IRA, GOOD EVENING.
[03:49:30] >> HELLO. IRA, HERMOSA BEACH. ANYBODY RUNNING FOR CITY
[03:49:36] COUNCIL MAY HAVE SECOND THOUGHTS AFTER SEEING THE DECISION PUT
[03:49:40] BEFORE YOU GUYS.
[03:49:41] THIS IS A TOUGH ONE. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT THE HERMOSA
[03:49:46] BEACH STAFF, I'M REALLY DISAPPOINTED WITH THE STAFF ON THIS
[03:49:50] PROJECT. THEY STARTED OFF BEING A CHEERLEADER FOR THE
[03:49:53] ILL-CONCEIVED GREENBELT PROJECT, AND NOW THEY MADE A U-TURN AND
[03:49:58] NOW THEY FAVOR SOUTH PARK. YOU CAN SEE THAT IN THE WAY THEY HAVE
[03:50:02] WRITTEN THE STAFF REPORT. IT IS ALL ABOUT SOUTH PARK AND DIDN'T
[03:50:07] SEEM AS IF THERE WAS ANY EVEN-HANDED ANALYSIS IN THERE AND IN THE
[03:50:11] WAY THEY PUT IT FORTH. TO GIVE YOU A FEW EXAMPLES, THEY SAID THE
[03:50:15] PROJECT WOULD TAKE A YEAR. WE AGREE THAT IS PROBABLY A VERY
[03:50:18] UNLIKELY PLAYGROUND AND THE COMMUNITY CENTER WOULD REMAIN OPEN
[03:50:23] 100% OPERATIONAL DURING THE CONSTRUCTION. THAT IS HIGHLY
[03:50:26] UNLIKELY. ONE LADY SAID PEOPLE WON'T LET THEIR KIDS PLAY THERE.
[03:50:30] NO MAIN ENTRANCE TO THE PARK. IT WILL PROBABLY BE USED FOR
[03:50:35] TRUCKS AS A STAGING AREA. DIRT WILL BE PILED UP TOWARDS WHERE
[03:50:39] THE SCHOOL OR IMAGINE THE SCHOOL FOLKS WILL PROBABLY HAVE TO
[03:50:42] LEAVE THE AREA. THEY TALK ABOUT NOISE THAT THEY WILL BUILD A
[03:50:49] FENCE. THAT IS GOING TO HELP NOISE. OKAY.
[03:50:52] THEY TALK ABOUT ODOR. THAT WE HEARD EARLIER 48 TO 72 HOURS
[03:50:57] OF ODOR IN THE FACILITY FROM STANDING WATER. IT IS HARD TO
[03:51:06] IMAGINE THAT WON'T HAVE TOXIC FLUID IN IT. THAT IS CAUSING THE
[03:51:11] ODOR FOR THAT LONG OF A PERIOD OF TIME.
[03:51:13] TO MAKE THIS PROJECT WORK AT SOUTH PARK, YOU HAVE TO IMAGINE
[03:51:17] WE TAKE TOXIC WATER. AS STAFF SAYS, IT HAS DISTINCT BACTERIA,
[03:51:22] COPPER, DDT, AND OTHER DANGEROUS CHEMICALS DIRECTED FROM STORM
[03:51:27] DRAIN MAKE A RIGHT TURN GO THROUGH PUMPING STATION AT GREENBELT
Page 64 of 94
[03:51:31] PUMP CAN'T BE ABOVE GROUND AS WE KNOW. THAT IS AGAINST THE RULES
[03:51:35] FOR THE GREENBELT AND PUMPING STATION WOULD HAVE TO BE NEAR
[03:51:39] SILENT LIKE 1 AT BOULEVARD PARK, WHICH IS NOISY IF ANYONE WENT ON
[03:51:44] THAT TOUR WOULD KNOW TOXIC WATER WOULD BE PIPED QUARTER OF MILE
[03:51:49] DOWN GREENBELT TO BE TORN UP IN THE PIPE. NOT SURE IT IS LEGAL.
[03:51:54] THEY ARE CALLING IT A SALT WATER BARRIER, WHICH IT IS NOT AND TO
[03:51:58] MAKE IT TO SOUTH PARK WHERE IT STARTS TO GET TREATED, AS I SAID,
[03:52:02] THE WATER STAYS FOR TWO TO THREE DAYS WITH AN ODOR, AND THEN WE
[03:52:07] HAVE TO DEAL WITH THAT AND THEN THE FILTERED WATER GOES DOWN INTO
[03:52:11] THE GROUND ASSUMING THERE IS ENOUGH ROOM BETWEEN THE GALLERY AND
[03:52:15] THE WATER TABLE. THERE IS RUMORS THAT OR INFORMATION OUT THERE
[03:52:21] THAT WATER, THERE IS NO ROOM FOR THAT OR VARIANCE. THAT WON'T
[03:52:25] HAPPEN. WE CAN'T HAVE A VARIANCE. SO IN ANY CASE, I RECOMMEND
[03:52:28] IN MY LAST FEW SECONDS THAT WE TAKE OPTION 3 AND FAVOR THE TASK
[03:52:33] FORCE AND THAT WE ALSO FORM A COMMUNITY GROUP AND BRING IN THE
[03:52:37] COMMUNITY TO ADD INPUT INTO THE PROCESS SO THAT WE CAN MAYBE COME
[03:52:41] UP WITH IDEAS. WE HAVE LOTS OF EXPERTS IN THE FIELD. I ALSO
[03:52:44] WOULD RECOMMEND READING, OF COURSE, CARLA VELTMAN'S LETTER.
[03:52:49] THANK YOU.
[03:52:50] >> THANK YOU, IRA. MADAME CLERK?
[03:52:53] >> NEXT, WE HAVE [INDISCERNIBLE]. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK
[03:52:59] BETH?
[03:53:00] >> YES.
[03:53:01] >> THANK YOU.
[03:53:02] >> FIRST OFF, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE COUNCIL FOR BEING
[03:53:04] HERE. I WOULD LIKE TO START OFF. I'M ETHAN MYBUR LIVING IN
[03:53:11] MANHATTAN BEACH. I EXPERIENCED THE PUBLIC AREAS AND GREENBELT
[03:53:15] AND PUBLIC PARKS AS MUCH AS EVERYONE HERE. I UNDERSTAND THAT
[03:53:20] MANY MAY BE IN OPPOSITION OF ILL-FOUNDED OF US KIDS, BUT WE MAKE
[03:53:26] UP A LARGE PORTION OF THE COMMUNITY THAT ENJOYS THE BEAUTY OF
[03:53:29] THIS TOWN AS WELL. THE FEATURE I ENJOY THE MOST AND MOST
[03:53:33] DEFINING FEATURE IS WORLD CLASS BEACHES OPTION 2 AT SOUTH PARK IS
[03:53:38] THE BEST SPOT FOR THE PROJECT THIS AREA WOULD INVOLVE MUCH LESS
[03:53:42] INTERFERENCE WITH THE PUBLIC THAN OTHER OPTIONS. WE SHOULD GO
[03:53:46] FORWARD WITH THIS SPOT. WE HAVE THE ABILITY ALREADY TO DO SO BUT
[03:53:49] JUST NEED THE OKAY. IF WE DON'T, FINANCIAL BURDENS COULD FACE
[03:53:53] THE ENTIRETY OF HERMOSA AND OTHER OPTIONS COULD CAUSE MONETARY
[03:53:59] SETBACKS WE FRANKLY DON'T NEED. MOVING TO REDONDO WOULD COME AT
[03:54:03] A COST OF NEAR $200,000 PAID BY HERMOSA BEACH AND MORE
[03:54:09] IMPORTANTLY FINES STARTING FROM WATER QUALITY IN 2021 COULD ADD
[03:54:13] UP TO $13.5 MILLION PER YEAR WE CAN ONLY EXPECT TO COME OUT OF
[03:54:17] THE TAXPAYERS POCKETS. THE FINANCIAL BURDEN THAT COMES WITH
[03:54:21] CANCELING THIS PROJECT IS SIMPLY TOO MUCH. I'M ON THE SURF TEAM
[03:54:27] AT MIRA COSA. I UNDERSTAND THE CURRENT PROBLEM WITH THE CURRENT
[03:54:33] DRAINAGE SYSTEM AS MUCH WHEN IT STANDS WHEN I GO IN THE WATER IN
[03:54:37] MORNING AND IT DOESN'T LOOK SMELL OR TASTE OKAY. I KNOW THERE IS
[03:54:41] DEFINITELY A PROBLEM WITH THIS. I UNDERSTAND WHERE EVERYONE IS
Page 65 of 94
[03:54:44] COMING FROM BUT CLEANLINESS OF OUR BEAUTIFUL BEACHES IS OF THE
[03:54:48] UTMOST IMPORTANCE. I'M PART OF A FAMILY AS WELL AND UNDERSTAND
[03:54:52] THE TEMPORARY STRUGGLE THIS PROJECT MAY CAUSE OTHERS, BUT I URGE
[03:54:56] YOU GUYS TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE LONG TERM BENEFITS OF GOING
[03:55:00] FORWARD WITH A PROJECT THAT WILL HELP AND HEAVILY OUTWEIGH THE
[03:55:04] MOMENTARY ISSUES THIS MAY CAUSE. THANK YOU.
[03:55:07] >> THANK YOU, ETHAN. BARBARA? GOOD EVENING.
[03:55:13] >> BARBARA ELLMAN, LOMA DRIVE. I THINK MY HUSBAND LEFT OUT
[03:55:20] ONE IMPORTANT PART. THAT WAS I WILL GO TO ANOTHER -- I WILL
[03:55:23] CHANGE DIRECTION AFTER THIS, BUT ONE OF THE THINGS WE WERE
[03:55:26] DISCUSSING IS THE FACT THAT THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE PARK
[03:55:31] WOULD NEED TO BE CLOSED IF THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH THE STANDING
[03:55:34] WATER AND THE SMELL. I LOOK AT THIS AS THIS IS THE EXACT SAME
[03:55:39] THING THAT WOULD HAPPEN WHEN THERE IS A BIG RAIN AND WE CLOSE THE
[03:55:43] BEACHES OR AT LEAST ADVISE THE SURFERS NOT TO GO IN WATER. ARE
[03:55:48] WE GOING TO PUT SIGNS UP AT THE PARK AND WARN FAMILIES THEY
[03:55:52] SHOULDN'T BE AT THE PARK FOR NEXT 48 TO 72 HOURS? I'M A
[03:55:56] GRANDMOTHER AND JEFF IS A GRANDMOTHER. YOU ARE ALL PARENTS THAT
[03:56:00] PARK. YOU KNOW WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. THESE KIDS PLAY AT
[03:56:03] THE PARK AND ROLL IN THE GRASS, OUR DOGS, ALL OF US. THIS IS --
[03:56:08] WE DON'T KNOW FOR SURE THAT THIS IS GOING TO HAPPEN. I TALKED TO
[03:56:12] JUSTIN ABOUT THIS AT A MEETING. THERE IS SO MUCH MAYBE THAT YOU
[03:56:17] HAVE TO DO BETTER THAN THAT. WE DESERVE BETTER THAN MAYBE. WE
[03:56:21] NEED MORE ANSWERS. I'M ASKING YOU TO REGROUP.
[03:56:24] WE TALKED ABOUT THIS EARLIER. BEFORE YOU STARTED A
[03:56:28] SUB-COMMITTEE OF HAVING A WORKING GROUP. I THINK IT IS
[03:56:32] EXTRAORDINARILY IMPORTANT THAT WE BRING EVERYBODY IN. WATERMAN
[03:56:36] AND WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENTALISTS AND LOCAL RESIDENTS AS WELL AS
[03:56:41] YOU. THERE IS WAY TOO MUCH GOING ON HERE. THE LACK OF
[03:56:46] COMMUNICATION IS STAGGERING. I DON'T WANT TO BE THE PERSON THAT
[03:56:48] LOOKS OVER AT SOMEONE LIKE CHRISTY AND SAY THIS IS YOUR FAULT.
[03:56:55] IT'S A HUGE PROJECT. WHEN IT MORPHED, JEFF IS STILL QUESTIONING
[03:56:59] WHAT HAPPENED BACK IN 2012, AND MIKE IS SAYING, WELL, MAYBE THIS
[03:57:05] IS GOING TO HAPPEN. THIS IS -- THIS IS NOT HOW WE WORK. THIS IS
[03:57:09] -- THIS IS HUGE. YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REGROUP. I HONESTLY
[03:57:13] BELIEVE THAT THE OPTION 3 ALLOWS US TO DO THAT, JUST TO REGROUP.
[03:57:20] I WANT TO TRUST THIS IS DONE RIGHT, BUT THE COMMUNICATION IS
[03:57:26] RIDICULOUS.
[03:57:27] EVEN MRS. MCGOWAN ADMITTED LAST YEAR THEY NEVER GAVE ANY
[03:57:35] THOUGHT TO THE HOMEOWNERS GOING TO BUILD ONE OF THE LARGEST
[03:57:38] PROJECTS IN THIS CITY, AND THEY WERE LOOKING AT THE GREENBELT AS
[03:57:42] BEING OPEN SPACE 15 FEET FROM SOMEONE'S FRONT DOOR. WE CAN DO
[03:57:47] BETTER THAN THIS. I REALLY HAVE FAITH. I'M GLAD THAT WE ARE ALL
[03:57:51] ABLE TO BE HERE TO DISCUSS THIS, BUT, AGAIN, I REALLY THINK A
[03:57:56] WORKING GROUP IS IN ORDER IF YOU ARE ABLE TO DO WHAT WE HOPE,
[03:58:00] WHICH IS TO GO WITH OPTION 3. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[03:58:03] >> THANK YOU. TAMMY? OH, IT IS CAMMIE NOT TAMMY.
Page 66 of 94
[03:58:10] >> I'M USED TO IT.
[03:58:12] >> [LAUGHING].
[03:58:13] >> THANK YOU FOR LISTENING TO ALL OF THE CONCERNS. I WILL
[03:58:18] SAY BECAUSE WE ALWAYS SAY THEY DON'T LISTEN OR CARE. NOW WE ARE
[03:58:22] HERE, SADLY CRAMMING IT ALL IN HERE IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS. I
[03:58:26] WILL SPEAK FOR THE PARKS SINCE THE KIDS THINK THAT PEOPLE ARE NOT
[03:58:30] SPEAKING FOR SOUTH PARK. I GO TO THE BEACH MORE THAN I GO TO
[03:58:34] SOUTH PARK. I HELPED GET SOUTH PARK TO WHERE IT IS TODAY, THE
[03:58:39] PLAYGROUND PIECE OF IT. SO I DO KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT AS
[03:58:46] FAR AS TIME AND GRANTS AND BEING ABLE TO EXTEND GRANTS OR BEING
[03:58:51] ABLE TO GET NEW GRANTS OR BEING ABLE TO TALK TO THE STATE OR A
[03:58:54] LOT OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE TO CHANGE THINGS AS THE COMMUNITY GIVES
[03:58:59] INPUT TO THINGS.
[03:59:00] I THINK GRASS AND TREES AND OPEN SPACE IS AS IMPORTANT AS
[03:59:06] THE BEACH. I THINK THAT SEVEN YEARS AGO, WHEN ALL OF THIS WAS
[03:59:13] GETTING DONE ON HERONDO AND BOTTOM OF HERONDO AND THE WALL WAS
[03:59:20] TORN OUT. OH, MY GOSH. THERE WAS NO DISCUSSION OF WHY COULDN'T
[03:59:23] IT HAVE GONE THERE? I KNOW THAT TIME HAS PASSED. NOW, THERE ARE
[03:59:28] MORE BIG PLANS FOR REDONDO BEACH SPACES WITH THEM TEARING UP
[03:59:34] ROADS AND EMPTY LOTS AND ADDS PLANTS AND MOVE THINGS AND PUT
[03:59:39] THINGS AT THE DOCKS. THEY HAVE LOTS OF THINGS GOING IN AN AREA
[03:59:43] THAT IS VERY CLOSE TO HERMOSA BEACH. WE SHOULDN'T NOW DISREGARD
[03:59:47] AN OPPORTUNITY THAT IS COMING BECAUSE WE ACTUALLY HAVE TIME TO
[03:59:51] SEE THESE PLANS COMING TO FRUITION AND GET A WATER INFILTRATION
[03:59:57] PLANT INTO THOSE PLANS.
[03:59:58] I ALSO WANT TO SAY AS FAR AS SPACE, AND THESE KIDS HAVE JUST
[04:00:04] THE OCEAN, YOU WOULDN'T WANT A MCMANSION BUILT ON A TINY LOT. WE
[04:00:10] HAVE REQUIREMENTS. YOU HAVE REQUIREMENTS, HOW CLOSE YOUR HOUSE
[04:00:13] CAN GO TO THE NEXT HOUSE, AND WE HAVE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS ALL
[04:00:18] OVER THE CITY BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT LARGE THINGS IN SMALL SPACES.
[04:00:21] THIS IS A VERY BIG PROJECT TRYING TO GO IN VERY SMALL AND CRAMMED
[04:00:27] MINIMAL GREEN SPACES THAT HERMOSA BEACH HAS. SO I THANK YOU FOR
[04:00:31] LISTENING. I JUST SAY THAT WE JUST NEED THREE FOR NO. 3.
[04:00:36] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[04:00:37] >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. BETH?
[04:00:41] >> HI. I'M BETH ROHR. I LIVE AT 1055 8TH PLACE. THANKS
[04:00:49] FOR LISTENING TO US. ONE KEY THING I WANTED TO SAY, ESPECIALLY
[04:00:52] TO THE KIDS THAT ARE FOCUSING ON THE CONSTRUCTION AND A MOMENTARY
[04:00:57] INCONVENIENCE, THIS IS NOT A MOMENTARY INCONVENIENCE. THIS IS
[04:01:01] LONG-TERM DAMAGE TO OUR COMMUNITY. IT IS LONG-TERM DAMAGE TO OUR
[04:01:05] SOIL, TO OUR AIR. THERE IS CONTAMINATION THAT WILL GO INTO BOTH.
[04:01:10] SO I'M ASKING THAT, AGAIN, PLEASE CHOOSE OPTION 3 AND PLEASE
[04:01:16] LOOK AT THE LONG TERM DAMAGE AND THE HOMEOWNERS, THEY ARE -- WE
[04:01:20] HAVE HOMEOWNERS BACK THERE CRYING WHO REALLY WANT TO SPEAK, BUT
[04:01:25] BECAUSE THEY ARE SO EMOTIONAL -- THESE ARE THEIR HOMES THAT ARE
[04:01:28] RIGHT NEXT TO THE PARK. THEY ARE BEING -- THEY ARE BEING
[04:01:33] PERSONALLY NOT INCONVENIENCED. THIS IS THEIR HOME AND COST OF
Page 67 of 94
[04:01:40] LIVING AND THEIR EVERYTHING. IT IS NOT JUST A TWO-YEAR
[04:01:43] INCONVENIENCE. IT IS LONG-TERM.
[04:01:46] I JUST WANTED TO SAY SO MANY OF THE THINGS ARE THE SAME
[04:01:57] THINGS WE DEALT WITH, WITH OIL. IF YOU VOTED NO ON OIL, I DON'T
[04:02:04] KNOW HOW YOU COULD VOTE FOR THIS. IT IS THE SAME THING IN MY
[04:02:07] MIND. THANK YOU.
[04:02:08] >> THANK YOU, BETH. MADAME CLERK? OKAY. OUR CLERK
[04:02:13] DOESN'T HAVE MORE CARDS IF YOU ARE IN THE AUDIENCE RIGHT NOW AND
[04:02:16] WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, PLEASE STEP FORWARD.
[04:02:20] >> I WOULD LIKE [INDISCERNIBLE].
[04:02:23] >> I'M SORRY WE MISSED YOU.
[04:02:24] >> I'M KELLY MUNIN AND LIVE ON 4TH STREET IN HERMOSA RIGHT
[04:02:31] ON THE GREENBELT ADJACENT TO SOUTH PARK. I THANK YOU FOR
[04:02:34] RECOMMENDING WE DON'T DO IT ON THE GREENBELT AND SOUTH PARK, BUT
[04:02:38] I ASK YOU TO TAKE IT COMPLETELY OFF THE TABLE. WE DEFINITELY
[04:02:42] NEED TO DO OPTION 3. I WAS HEARTENED TO HEAR REDONDO WAS WILLING
[04:02:48] TO TALK TO US, AT LEAST, AND CONSIDER TO SHARE THE BURDEN WITH
[04:02:52] US. I'M NOT SURE WHY WE ARE LOOKING AT FRANCISCA AND NOT HERONDO
[04:02:59] BETWEEN VALLEY AND MONTERREY. USING BOTH SIDES OF HERONDO, WE
[04:03:05] WOULD SHARE IT WITH REDONDO. WE WOULD HAVE HALF, AND THEY WOULD
[04:03:09] HAVE HALF OF FEW AREAS ARE IMPACTED. THEY HAVE DRIVEWAYS ON
[04:03:15] VALLEY. YOU CAN STILL USE MONTERREY AND VALLEY AND PEOPLE CAN
[04:03:19] USE HERONDO ON EITHER SIDES OF THOSE. TO ME, THAT SEEMS LIKE AN
[04:03:23] IDEAL LOCATION RIGHT WHERE THE DRAIN IS TO SHARE THE BURDEN WITH
[04:03:29] REDONDO. I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU DIDN'T MENTION THAT WAS ON THE
[04:03:32] TABLE. I APPRECIATE YOU ARE TALKING TO REDONDO TO COMPLETELY
[04:03:36] RENEGOTIATE THE DEAL. THIS HAPPENED IN 2013, AND YOU WAITED TO
[04:03:41] 2018 TO START DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT? THAT IS ON YOU. YOU
[04:03:45] SHOULDN'T MAKE PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THE AREAS OF HERMOSA PAY THE
[04:03:49] PRICE FOR YOUR BAD DECISIONS. THIS IS SOMETHING YOU SHOULD HAVE
[04:03:52] TAKEN CARE OF A LONG TIME AGO WITH PLENTY OF TIME TO DEAL WITH IT
[04:03:56] IN THE RIGHT WAY. THANK YOU.
[04:03:58] >> THANK YOU. ADAM?
[04:04:05] >> THANK YOU. ADAM WALL, 517 LOMA DRIVE, AND I APPRECIATE
[04:04:10] THE TIME. SORRY I WAS LATE. I MISSED EVERYBODY. I GOT OFF AT
[04:04:17] THE BASEBALL FIELD.
[04:04:18] >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.
[04:04:20] >> BY THE WAY, WE TIED.
[04:04:22] >> PERFECT.
[04:04:23] >> THANK YOU GUYS AND COUNCILMEMBERS THAT MET AND TALKED
[04:04:27] WITH ME. I TRULY APPRECIATE THAT. MY WIFE AND I LIVED ON LOMA
[04:04:31] DRIVE FOR OVER 12 YEARS AND OUR FAMILY. I WANT TO THANK JESSICA
[04:04:36] ARCADIA, BETH, AND CAMMY FOR THE HARD WORK THEY PUT INTO SOUTH
[04:04:41] PARK. MEMBERS THAT WERE THERE THIS PAST WEEK, YOU SEE HOW MANY
[04:04:45] KIDS AND ADULTS USE THAT. IT IS A GREAT FACILITY. I WANT TO
[04:04:49] START OFF WITH I KNOW WE HAVE TO DO OUR PART. WE NEVER SAID, NO.
[04:04:52] WE WON'T DO SOMETHING. WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING BUT SOMETHING OF
Page 68 of 94
[04:04:55] THIS MAGNITUDE, THIS IS PROBABLY NOT THE WAY WE WANT TO GO.
[04:04:58] AGAIN, AS IRA SAID, I'M PRETTY DISAPPOINTED IN THE CITY THAT YOU
[04:05:03] KNEW THE ENTIRE TIME WE TALKED WHETHER IT WAS BACK IN JUNE OR
[04:05:09] OCTOBER. IT WAS ALWAYS 500 FEET AND SOMEHOW THE 300-FOOT NUMBER
[04:05:13] CAME UP. NEXT DOOR NEIGHBORS, 299 GOT A NOTIFICATION, AND WE
[04:05:18] DIDN'T GET ANYTHING. WE ARE THE LAST STREET OVERLOOKING SOUTH
[04:05:22] PARK. I'M REALLY DISAPPOINTED IN THAT. ANOTHER ISSUE, AGAIN, AS
[04:05:26] EVERYBODY STATED IS THE ODOR. I SIGNED -- WE SIGNED UP ABOUT
[04:05:30] THIS HOUSE ABOUT THE NOISE. THAT IS NOT AN ISSUE WE ARE TALKING
[04:05:33] ABOUT. WE KNOW ABOUT NOISE AND ARE ACCUSTOMED TO LATE-NIGHT
[04:05:38] PARTIERS IN SOUTH PARK AND KIDS YELLING AND SCREAMING. WE SIGNED
[04:05:42] UP FOR THAT WHEN BOUGHT OUR HOUSE BUT DIDN'T SIGN UP FOR THINGS
[04:05:46] LIKE BIG DIGS AND ODOR AND CONTAMINATION. NOT REALLY HAVE THERE
[04:05:51] BEEN TESTS DONE FOR THIS. AGAIN, WHEN STAFF REPORT STATED THIS
[04:05:54] WILL BE FINISHED IN 12 MONTHS. BE REALISTIC WITH HOW THE STATE
[04:05:59] WORKS WHEN IT COMES TO CONSTRUCTION. WE ARE LOOKING AT PROBABLY
[04:06:02] 18+ MONTHS. I HAVE KIDS GOING FROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO MIDDLE
[04:06:06] SCHOOL AND USING THAT FOR NURF BOARDS NOW. BY THE TIME THE
[04:06:11] PROJECT IS DONE, THEY WILL BE DOING THEIR OLDER THING PROBABLY ON
[04:06:18] BEACHES, BUT THEY UTILIZE THAT PARK RIGHT NOW WITH ALL THEIR
[04:06:22] FRIENDS. TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. FOR THOSE THAT HAVEN'T
[04:06:25] BEEN TO THE PROJECT IN LAKEWOOD, I MEAN, IF YOU HEAR THE NOISE,
[04:06:29] THERE IS A LOUD NOISE THAT COMES FROM THAT BOX THAT IS RAISED
[04:06:32] ABOVE THE GROUND. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I DID NOT SIGN UP FOR
[04:06:36] AS A HOMEOWNER LIVING NEXT TO SOUTH PARK. AGAIN, I DON'T THINK
[04:06:41] THERE HAVE BEEN TESTS DONE FOR WATER TABLE LEVELS FOR
[04:06:44] LIQUEFACTION AND LANDSLIDES AT SOUTH PARK. WE ARE ASKING FOR
[04:06:49] SOMETHING THAT IS FAIR. DISSOLVE MOU AND LOOK AT OTHER PROJECTS.
[04:06:54] WE ARE ALL FOR SMALLER PROJECTS AT HERMOSA BEACH BUT NOT THIS
[04:06:59] ONE. THANK YOU.
[04:07:00] >> THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE FOR PUBLIC
[04:07:03] COMMENT AT THIS TIME?
[04:07:05] >> I WILL TRY.
[04:07:06] >> ALL RIGHT. JESSICA.
[04:07:13] >> I'M JESSICA [INDISCERNIBLE]. I LIVE ON LOMA DRIVE. I'M
[04:07:16] SORRY. I'M SO UPSET. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU REMEMBER, BUT WHEN
[04:07:21] BEACH CITY HEALTH DISTRICT DID THEIR BLUE ZONE SURVEY, THE SOUTH
[04:07:26] BAY CAME BACK AS STRESSED AS NEW ORLEANS AFTER HURRICANE KATRINA.
[04:07:32] THE REASON WHY WE WERE ALL SO STRESSED IS BECAUSE WE SPEND ALL
[04:07:37] OUR TIME WORRYING ABOUT HOW WE WILL AFFORD TO LIVE HERE. THAT IS
[04:07:40] LITERALLY IN THE BEACH CITY HEALTH DISTRICT STUDY. I LEAVE EVERY
[04:07:45] WEEK TO GO WORK IN SAN FRANCISCO TO AFFORD TO LIVE HERE AND OWN A
[04:07:49] HOME. I HAVE NEIGHBORS ON MY STREET THAT WORK DOUBLE SHIFTS AT
[04:07:54] SHARKY'S JUST TO AFFORD THE RENT. I JUST REALLY FEEL LIKE WE ARE
[04:07:59] NOT BEING TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. I APPRECIATE ALL OF YOU WHO
[04:08:03] CAME TO LISTEN TO US. THE FACT WE DIDN'T EVEN GET NOTIFIED AND
[04:08:08] EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT WE LIVE AT SOUTH PARK. I'M AT PARK AND REC.
Page 69 of 94
[04:08:12] I HAVE TO RECUSE MYSELF EVERY TIME WE TALK ABOUT SOUTH PARK. I
[04:08:16] WASN'T ABLE TO VOTE ON THE COMMUNITY GARDEN OR PLAYGROUND.
[04:08:20] SOMEHOW FOR THIS PROJECT, WE WEREN'T EVEN NOTICED. I JUST -- I
[04:08:23] JUST REALLY FEEL LIKE IN OCTOBER I LEFT IN GOOD FAITH. I WAS
[04:08:27] GOING TO DO MY PART, AND I PROMISED I WOULD STAY POSITIVE. THAT
[04:08:31] IS WHY I'M SO UPSET. EVERYONE TONIGHT HAS BEEN SO POSITIVE AND
[04:08:35] LOVELY, AND I'M OVER HERE SITTING HERE STRESSING OUT, WILL I BE
[04:08:39] ABLE TO LIVE IN HERMOSA ANYMORE IF SOMETHING HAPPENS TO MY
[04:08:44] PROPERTY VALUE OR TO MY CHILD AND THAT PARK BECAUSE OF
[04:08:47] CONTAMINATION OR DANGERS THAT COME FROM THE CONSTRUCTION?
[04:08:50] AND I JUST WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW THAT, THAT IS REAL. IT IS
[04:08:53] NOT SELF-SERVING.
[04:08:56] IT IS LITERALLY AN EPIDEMIC IN THE SOUTH BAY. PEOPLE ARE
[04:09:01] DYING OF STROKES AND HEART ATTACKS AND HAVING HUGE DEPRESSION
[04:09:05] ISSUES BECAUSE THEY -- EVERY DAY THEY WAKE UP WONDERING HOW THEY
[04:09:09] WILL AFFORD TO LIVE HERE. I JUST WANT THAT TO BE RECOGNIZED. I
[04:09:13] DON'T WANT TO BE BULLIED FOR IT OR BE CALLED A NIMBYIST OR
[04:09:18] SELF-SERVING BECAUSE I CARE ABOUT TAKING CARE OF MY FAMILY.
[04:09:22] THANK YOU.
[04:09:23] >> THANK YOU, JESSICA. ANYONE ELSE? YES. COME ON UP.
[04:09:27] >> HI. I'M DAN RUCOS AND LIVE AT 501 AND WANT TO SAY MAYOR
[04:09:32] AND COUNCILMEN, THANKS FOR VISITING GREENBELT AND SOUTH PARK AND
[04:09:38] THANKS FOR YOUR RECOMMENDATION ON 3 ON 3. THANK YOU.
[04:09:42] >> THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? ALL RIGHT. I WILL CLOSE
[04:09:47] PUBLIC COMMENT. THANK YOU EVERYONE FOR COMING UP AND SPEAKING
[04:09:51] AND SUBMITTING YOUR COMMENTS ONLINE AS WELL. I WILL LOOK TO MY
[04:09:55] COLLEAGUES FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION FOR A MOTION. ALL RIGHT.
[04:10:05] MAYOR PRO TEM?
[04:10:08] >> I DON'T KNOW HOW TO COALESCE MY THOUGHTS. I WILL
[04:10:13] MENTION A COUPLE OF THINGS. I WANT TO JUST START BY GIVING A
[04:10:17] COUPLE THANK YOUS ACROSS THE DAIS HERE. THE FIRST ONE, I WAS
[04:10:21] SITTING HERE THINKING COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY, IT WAS YOUR
[04:10:26] SUGGESTION WE CLEAR THE DECKS FOR THIS CONVERSATION TONIGHT AND
[04:10:29] TOOK THINGS OFF THE AGENDA TO HAVE THIS TIME AND HAVE IT AT A
[04:10:33] DECENT HOUR. THAT WAS A GOOD CALL. THIS IS VERY, VERY
[04:10:36] IMPORTANT. I WANT TO JUST THANK OUR SUB-COMMITTEE DOUG DUWITH
[04:10:42] WORKING IN-BETWEEN MEETINGS TO REACH OUT TO REDONDO AND TO FIGURE
[04:10:48] OUT WHERE WE WERE AND WHERE WE WOULD GO NEXT.
[04:10:51] THAT IS WHAT WE ARE HERE TO DO. I JUST WANT TO -- I JUST
[04:10:57] WANT TO REALLY DEEPLY THANK EVERYBODY FOR BEING INVOLVED AND
[04:11:01] STAYING INVOLVED AND COMING TO THESE MEETINGS AND EXPRESSING SO
[04:11:05] THOUGHTFULLY YOUR PERSPECTIVES. WHAT IS HARD BEING ON THE
[04:11:09] COUNCIL IS WHEN WE SAY WE ARE AT THE BEGINNING, WHAT WE KNOW IS
[04:11:13] THAT WE JUST HAVE TO SURFACE THINGS AS THEY WERE UNTIL WE MAKE
[04:11:19] ANOTHER DECISION. IF THE GREENBELT WAS ORIGINALLY THERE, WE HAVE
[04:11:23] TO HAVE IT IN THE CONVERSATION UNTIL WE MAKE A DIFFERENT
[04:11:27] DECISION. IT IS NOT NECESSARILY BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T HEARD
Page 70 of 94
[04:11:29] EVERYTHING THAT YOU HAVE BEEN SAID. IN FACT, I THINK THERE IS
[04:11:33] STRONG EVIDENCE TONIGHT THAT GIVEN THE RECOMMENDATION AHEAD OF
[04:11:38] PUBLIC COMMENT THAT YOU HAVE BEEN LISTENED TO. YOU SHOULD BE
[04:11:45] LISTENED TO. IT IS IMPORTANT. I THINK IT WAS A GREAT CALL TO
[04:11:49] MAKE THE STATEMENT BEFORE PUBLIC COMMENT BECAUSE SOMETIMES WE
[04:11:52] HAVE THESE LONG MEETINGS. IF YOU DON'T HAVE THE BENEFIT OF
[04:11:56] INSIGHT, YOU WOULD PROBABLY HAVE HAD MORE STRESS EVEN MORE STRESS
[04:12:02] THAN YOU ALREADY HAVE AROUND THIS ISSUE.
[04:12:04] THAT SAID, THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT I -- I WOULD LIKE A
[04:12:08] LITTLE BIT MORE CLARITY ON. THAT HAS TO DO WITH IF WE APPROVE
[04:12:17] OPTION 3, WHICH IS A VERY SERIOUS CONSIDERATION AND POTENTIAL
[04:12:24] DECISION TO UNRAVEL THE CURRENT MOU, WHICH IS AN APPROVED PROJECT
[04:12:31] WITH SIGNIFICANT FUNDING, I KNOW WE DON'T HAVE ALL OF THE
[04:12:35] ANSWERS. I REALLY APPRECIATE. IN FACT, I WAS GOING TO SAY IF MY
[04:12:39] FRIEND AND COLLEAGUE GARY IS OPTIMISTIC, THAT IS A VERY GOOD
[04:12:45] SIGN.
[04:12:46] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[04:12:47] >> I'M ALWAYS OPTIMISTIC, AND I REALLY BELIEVE THAT WE
[04:12:50] COULD LEAD AT THIS MOMENT IF WE GO WITH OPTION 3. HOWEVER, I
[04:12:54] THINK IT IS REALLY IMPORTANT THAT WE SURFACE A COUPLE OF THE
[04:12:58] THINGS WE SHOULDN'T LEAVE IN THE ROOM AS ASSUMPTIONS OR
[04:13:03] EXPECTATIONS. NO. 1 IS GREAT THAT REDONDO SHOWED UP AT 5 O'CLOCK
[04:13:09] WITH A LETTER SAYING THEY ARE WILLING TO SPEAK WITH US AND
[04:13:12] POTENTIALLY EXPLORE FURTHER SOME OF THE OPTIONS.
[04:13:15] MY -- I CERTAINLY WOULDN'T ASSUME, LIKE MANY PEOPLE HAVE
[04:13:20] STATED, THAT IF WE PURSUED A CONVERSATION WITH REDONDO AND THERE
[04:13:27] WAS A CHANCE AND THERE WAS A GOOD OPTION ON FRANCISCA STREET OR
[04:13:33] THEREABOUTS THAT AS, HAS BEEN STATED BY MANY, INCLUDING OUR CITY
[04:13:39] ATTORNEY AND MANY AS YOU AS RESIDENTS, WE WILL HAVE TO SITE A
[04:13:43] PROJECT. THAT COULD BE A SMALLER PROJECT IN SOUTH PARK THAT
[04:13:47] WOULD BE MUCH MORE EASY TO MANAGE POTENTIALLY. I JUST WANT TO
[04:13:52] RESTATE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE ARE DEALING WITH.
[04:13:56] SO ONE OF THOSE IS A LOT OF UNKNOWNS AS IT PERTAINS TO THE
[04:14:04] COSTS THAT COULD BE MUSHROOMING AROUND BACKING OUT OF THIS
[04:14:09] AGREEMENT. I SAY THAT DAUNTINGLY. IT IS A DAUNTING
[04:14:15] CONSIDERATION. WE REALLY DON'T KNOW. THERE COULD BE LAWSUITS.
[04:14:19] THERE COULD BE PAYBACK OF FUNDS, INCLUDING DAMAGES.
[04:14:23] THERE COULD BE A DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE TASK OF TRYING TO
[04:14:27] FIND ADDITIONAL FUNDING, WHICH WOULD MEAN, JUST SORT OF STATING
[04:14:32] FOR THE RECORD IF WE WERE IN AN ALTERNATIVE STATE WITHOUT A
[04:14:36] CURRENT AGREEMENT, WE WOULD BE FOOTING THE ENTIRE BILL
[04:14:40] POTENTIALLY FOR ANY WORK DONE HERE.
[04:14:43] SO I DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS MORE INSIGHT INTO THAT. I THINK
[04:14:48] IT IS WORTH RESTATING. IF THERE ARE ANY -- ANY OF US UP HERE WHO
[04:14:53] HAVE COMMENTS TO THAT PARTICULAR ASPECT OF THIS, WHICH IS TO ME,
[04:14:57] THE MOST CONCERNING, AND AS A COUNCILMEMBER FEELING LIKE WE HAVE
[04:15:02] A RESPONSIBILITY TO REALLY CONSIDER THAT AS FULLY AND AS POSSIBLE
Page 71 of 94
[04:15:08] AS IN THIS MOMENT. I DON'T KNOW IF CHRISTY WOULD HAVE OR ANY OF
[04:15:12] THE EXPERTS WHO ARE CLOSER TO THIS TOPIC WOULD HAVE ANY FURTHER
[04:15:16] COMMENTS THAN THE ONES THAT THEY HAVE MADE ALREADY THIS EVENING.
[04:15:20] I WOULD BE INTERESTED IN OPENING UP A LITTLE DISCUSSION ABOUT THE
[04:15:25] FINANCIAL IMPACTS TO OUR CITY GIVEN OPTION 3.
[04:15:36] >> KATHLEEN OR CHRISTY OR CITY ATTORNEY? NO ONE WANTS TO
[04:15:44] ANSWER YOU ON THAT ONE?
[04:15:45] >> SO IT IS --
[04:15:47] >> DOES SOMEONE WANT TO RAISE THEIR HAND? THANK YOU,
[04:15:50] KATHLEEN.
[04:15:51] >> I'M SORRY. I CAN'T SPEAK TO THE SITUATION WITH THE
[04:15:54] LEGAL AND FINANCIAL RAMIFICATIONS FROM BACKING OUT OF THE MOU.
[04:15:58] THAT IS OUTSIDE OF MY EXPERTISE.
[04:16:00] >> CAN I ASK YOU A QUESTION?
[04:16:02] >> YES.
[04:16:03] >> ARE THERE ANY KNOWN OR CURRENT PROJECTS THAT HAVE GOTTEN
[04:16:07] FUNDING FROM OTHER SOURCES TO FUND PROJECTS LIKE THIS THAT ARE NO
[04:16:10] THE PART OF THE STATE MATCHING FUNDS PROGRAM?
[04:16:15] >> WELL, I -- I MEAN, THE CITY OF LA HAS RAISED THEIR OWN
[04:16:23] PROP O AND BUILDING PROJECTS WITH THEIR OWN FUNDS THAT THEIR
[04:16:27] CITIZENS PAID FOR, SO -- BUT -- BUT THERE ARE MANY, MANY PROJECTS
[04:16:34] OTHER PROJECTS I'M AWARE OF THAT WERE BUILT WITH COMBINATION OF
[04:16:38] GRANT FUNDING AND LOCAL MATCH. THAT IS TYPICALLY HOW IT IS DONE.
[04:16:42] >> WE WOULD AND IT IS FINE TO STATE, BUT WE WOULD REALLY
[04:16:45] NEED TO ROLL UP OUR SLEEVES AND FIGURE OUT WHERE THE MONEY WILL
[04:16:48] COME FROM IF WE PIVOTED AWAY FROM THIS CURRENT PROGRAM FUNDING.
[04:16:54] >> YES. AND I GUESS THE ONLY THING I FEEL COMFORTABLE
[04:16:57] SAYING IS I DO -- IF YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO GET -- I DON'T KNOW WHAT
[04:17:02] THE LIKELIHOOD OF YOUR POLITICAL WORK WITH THE STATE TO GET THEM
[04:17:07] TO GIVE YOU MORE TIME ON THIS PARTICULAR GRANT, BUT I DO KNOW IN
[04:17:12] MOST GRANT APPLICATIONS THAT WE APPLY FOR, THERE IS -- THERE ARE
[04:17:16] QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT OTHER GRANT FUNDS HAVE YOU MANAGED AND YOU
[04:17:19] KNOW WERE -- YOU WERE YOU FOUND OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH A GRANT
[04:17:26] AGREEMENT AND SO FORTH. THAT WOULD TYPICALLY BE SOMETHING THAT
[04:17:30] FINANCING THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AT THE STATE
[04:17:35] WATER BOARD WOULD LOOK AT IN TERMS OF WHETHER OR HOW THEY WOULD
[04:17:38] VIEW A FUTURE GRANT SO.
[04:17:40] >> OKAY. THANK YOU.
[04:17:42] >> UH-HUH.
[04:17:43] >> WELL, I -- DOES YOUR CITY ATTORNEY WANT TO ADD
[04:17:47] SOMETHING?
[04:17:48] >> WE ARE NOT TRYING TO AVOID ANSWERING YOUR QUESTION, BUT
[04:17:50] I DON'T THINK WE CAN REALLY QUANTIFY IT AND GIVE YOU A REALISTIC
[04:17:55] ANSWER. I THINK I SAID EARLIER THAT THIS, THE OPTION 3 PATH IS
[04:17:59] VERY UNCERTAIN AND HAS A LOT OF POTENTIAL OBSTACLES, SUBSTANTIAL
[04:18:04] AMOUNT OF TIME SPENT IN NEGOTIATIONS AND INTERACTIONS WITH
[04:18:07] REGIONAL BOARD AND WITH OUR PARTNERS. IF YOU WANT TO EXPLORE THE
Page 72 of 94
[04:18:12] FRANCISCA SITE, CHRISTY INDICATED IT WOULD COST PROBABLY AS MUCH
[04:18:18] TO DO THE DESIGN WORK THERE AS IT HAS ALREADY COST TO DATE. WE
[04:18:22] DON'T KNOW IF THAT -- ANY MONEY THAT IS SPENT AT THIS POINT WOULD
[04:18:26] BE WASTED IF REDONDO BEACH ULTIMATELY SAYS NO GIVEN THEIR LETTER
[04:18:31] TONIGHT OPENS A VERY, VERY NARROW WINDOW AT BEST. IT IS VERY
[04:18:35] CAREFULLY WORDED AND VERY QUALIFIED. IF THAT DOESN'T WORK, WE
[04:18:40] HAVE TO REFOCUS OUR EFFORTS SOME PLACE ELSE. WE ARE TALKING
[04:18:44] ABOUT A LOT OF CONSULTANT COSTS, AND SO IT IS REALLY VERY
[04:18:48] DIFFICULT TO QUANTIFY IT. WE ARE TALKING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, I
[04:18:52] THINK. WHEN PUSH COMES TO SHOVE TO GET TO A PLACE WHERE WE MIGHT
[04:18:56] HAVE A SOLUTION, WE DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT THAT SOLUTION WILL
[04:18:59] LOOK LIKE. I MEAN, I THINK THAT IS THE ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION.
[04:19:03] >> I WILL JUST ADD MY PERSPECTIVE. IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT
[04:19:06] THE STATE WATER BOARD NEEDS A LOCATION; RIGHT? THEY WANT TO KNOW
[04:19:11] WHERE ARE WE GOING TO PUT THIS PROJECT? WE HAVE BEEN DANCING
[04:19:14] AROUND THE TOPIC FOR A YEAR NOW, AND WHAT THE REDONDO BEACH
[04:19:21] LETTER SHOWS US IS THAT THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLORE A
[04:19:26] LOCATION IN REDONDO BEACH THAT WOULD NOT REQUIRE NECESSARILY
[04:19:30] DISSOLVING THE MOU AND MAY LEAVE OPEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO RETAIN
[04:19:35] GRANT FUNDING. I AM VERY MOTIVATED TO HELP PARTICIPATE IN THAT.
[04:19:40] I'M SURE COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY WANTS TO CONSIDER TO PURSUE THOSE
[04:19:48] EFFORTS CONSIDERING HIS OPTIMISM. I THINK THAT CAN REALLY WORK
[04:19:51] IN OUR FAVOR, AND I ALSO VIEW MAYOR BRAND AS A VERY REASONABLE
[04:19:56] PERSON. HE HAS PUT OUT THERE ESSENTIALLY SOMEWHAT OF AN OFFER,
[04:20:00] AND WE CAN HAVE A CONVERSATION AND KIND OF WORK THROUGH THOSE
[04:20:04] DETAILS LIKE IMMEDIATELY, LIKE TOMORROW MORNING. AND, YOU KNOW,
[04:20:09] WE CAN WORK WITH STAFF, AND I FEEL BETTER ABOUT IT AT THIS POINT
[04:20:12] THAN I DID IN OCTOBER WHEN, YOU KNOW, THEY PRESENTED TO US OR, I
[04:20:18] GUESS, WE MET IN NOVEMBER AND PRESENTED OBSTACLES THAT WE NEEDED
[04:20:22] TO GET PAST. WE NEEDED THIS MEETING TO BE ABLE TO GIVE US
[04:20:27] AUTHORITY TO BE ABLE TO LOOK AT THAT AS A POTENTIAL LOCATION.
[04:20:30] I ALSO THINK THAT SOME OF THE COMMENTS RAISED BY CHRISTY
[04:20:35] ABOUT A PROJECT EVEN JUST FOR OUR OWN CONTRIBUTION ADDRESSING THE
[04:20:40] JUST LESS THAN 14% COULD END UP COSTING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
[04:20:45] THAT WILL BE THE SAME CASE FOR TORRANCE AND REDONDO BEACH. WHY
[04:20:49] WOULD WE ALL SPEND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
[04:20:54] ON OUR OWN WHEN WE COULD BE MOTIVATED TO SPEND LESS MONEY AND
[04:20:57] HAVE A MORE CONCENTRATED PROJECT AND AT LEAST LOOK AT FRANCISCA
[04:21:04] I'M NOT OPPOSED TO LOOKING AT ADJACENT HERONDO STREET AS WELL AND
[04:21:12] PART OF THE CONVERSATION ALL PARTIES ARE HEAVILY MOTIVATED TO
[04:21:16] WORK TOGETHER AND REGROUP AND FIND A LOCATION. ONE HAS BEEN
[04:21:20] PRESENTED.
[04:21:21] AND MOVE FORWARD TOGETHER TO SAVE EVERYONE TIME, MONEY,
[04:21:26] EXPENSE, AND HEARTACHE.
[04:21:28] >> THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MAYOR ARMATO. THIS IS KIND OF
[04:21:33] WHAT I WAS HOPING WE COULD ADD TO EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN SAID
[04:21:36] TONIGHT. BECAUSE I'M KIND OF WITH YOU WHERE YOU STAND ON THERE
Page 73 of 94
[04:21:40] IS A LOT OF REASONS TO THINK THERE IS STRONG MOTIVATION ON ALL
[04:21:45] SIDES OF -- FOR ALL SORTS OF REASONS. IT IS KIND OF A NARROW AND
[04:21:52] POTENTIALLY STEEP CLIMB AND I WANTED TO MAKE MENTION OF THE IDEA
[04:21:58] OF HAVING A TASK FORCE THAT INCLUDES SOME OF OUR RESIDENTS. ONE
[04:22:05] OF THE REASONS I KNOW THAT CAN SLOW THINGS DOWN SOMETIMES, BUT
[04:22:08] ONE OF THE REASONS I LIKE THAT IDEA OR WOULD LIKE IT AT LEAST
[04:22:13] EXPLORED IS THAT WE HAVE COME THIS FAR. I THINK ONE OF THE
[04:22:17] THINGS WE HAVE SUFFERED FROM IS WE HAVEN'T HAD ENOUGH COMMON
[04:22:21] UNDERSTANDING. I KNOW I HAVE HEARD SEVERAL THINGS TONIGHT THAT
[04:22:25] IN MY LEARNING THROUGH THIS PROJECT UP INCLUDING TO PREPARING
[04:22:28] JUST FOR THIS PAST WEEK THAT WE ARE STILL NOT CLEAR ON ALL OF THE
[04:22:33] FACTS. PEOPLE ARE AFRAID OF THINGS THAT THEY MAY NOT NEED TO BE
[04:22:39] AFRAID OF IN SOME CASES AND VERY, YOU KNOW, STRESSED AND
[04:22:43] CONCERNED FOR VERY GOOD REASONS AS WELL. THE MORE WE CAN BE ON
[04:22:46] THE SAME PAGE AND UTILIZE THE BRAIN POWER IN OUR COMMUNITY, I
[04:22:50] THINK THAT WILL HELP US IN MOVING FORWARD. I LOVE THE IDEA OF
[04:22:53] GETTING OUR STATE REPRESENTATIVES INVOLVED IN HELPING TO BRING
[04:22:59] AWARENESS AND INFLUENCE TO ALL OF THE BODIES. THE STATE WANTS
[04:23:05] AND NEEDS TO DO THIS. ALL OF THE COMMUNITIES NEED AND WANT TO DO
[04:23:08] THIS. I AM NOT OPPOSED FROM WHAT I CURRENTLY UNDERSTAND, SOUTH
[04:23:16] PARK IS POTENTIALLY A PRETTY GOOD LOCATION IF THERE IS A LOCATION
[04:23:22] IN HERMOSA BEACH WHERE WE NEED TO SITE A PROJECT. WE DON'T HAVE
[04:23:27] A LOT OF OPTIONS FRANKLY FOR CITING ANY PROJECT IN OUR CITY. WE
[04:23:35] ARE SQUEEZED. HOWEVER, I DO AGREE THAT IT WOULD BE -- IT SEEMS
[04:23:40] RIGHT-MINDED AND FAIR AND EQUITABLE IN MY MIND IF WE WERE ASKED
[04:23:46] TO SHOULDER A FACILITY OR PROJECT THAT WAS MORE PROPORTIONAL TO
[04:23:50] OUR CONTRIBUTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF, YOU KNOW, OUR CITY. I
[04:23:55] PROBABLY HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF FEW ODDS AND ENDS, BUT I WILL STOP
[04:23:59] THERE AND LET MY COLLEAGUES BUILD IN OR WEIGH IN. THANK YOU.
[04:24:03] THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS?
[04:24:08] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. THIS HAS BEEN A REALLY
[04:24:12] INTERESTING DISCUSSION. THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPORTANT. I --
[04:24:20] BUT I -- THERE IS THE PERSPECTIVE MAY BE A LITTLE SKEWED IN MY
[04:24:25] MIND IN THE SENSE THAT I KNOW THERE IS AN EARLY COMMENT ABOUT THE
[04:24:31] BILLIONS OF GALLONS COMING DOWN AND THE -- ON -- YOU KNOW, WHAT
[04:24:37] WOULD HAPPEN TO THE ORIGINAL GREENBELT SITE, I THINK THAT IS A
[04:24:44] REASONABLE CONCERN AND THINK IT IS WHY I WOULD NEVER APPROVE A
[04:24:48] PROJECT ON THAT ORIGINAL SELECTED SITE. THOSE GALLONS OF WATER
[04:24:54] HAVE COME DOWN, AND WE HAVE BEEN HAVING THIS INCREDIBLE WEATHER.
[04:24:58] PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE ON THE BEACH JUST SOUTH OF THE PIER MAYBE
[04:25:03] FOR ALMOST ABOUT A QUARTER OF A MILE IS AN INFILTRATION PROJECT
[04:25:08] THAT IS RUNNING ALMOST FOR 10 YEARS STRAIGHT NOW WITHOUT A
[04:25:11] PROBLEM. YOU HAVE WALKED BY IT 100 TIMES. THERE HAS NOT BEEN
[04:25:17] ANY SMELL. IT HAS BEEN FUNCTIONING. IN FACT, IT IS AN
[04:25:22] AWARD-WINNING PROJECT THAT WE PUT IN AT THE TIME THAT WE DID THE
[04:25:26] PIER AVENUE RENOVATIONS.
[04:25:29] I'M A LITTLE -- WHEN PEOPLE COME UP AND TALK AND SAY I HAVE
Page 74 of 94
[04:25:33] READ ALL OF THE COMMENTS AND HERE IS WHAT I HAVE TO SAY. MY
[04:25:36] PROBLEM WITH THAT IS THAT ALL OF THE COMMENTS ARE NOT CORRECT.
[04:25:40] THEY MAKE INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT A LOT OF THINGS.
[04:25:44] AND SO THE OTHER THING THAT DISTURBS ME ABOUT THIS
[04:25:48] DISCUSSION IS THAT THESE YOUNG MEN WHO HAVE COME UP HERE AND
[04:25:51] TALKED HAVE AS MUCH STATUS IN THIS DISCUSSION AS ANYBODY IN THIS
[04:25:56] ROOM.
[04:25:57] THAT THEY ARE -- THIS -- THE WHOLE IDEA WHEN WE MAKE
[04:26:00] IMPROVEMENTS, YOU KNOW, TO OUR CITY IS BASICALLY FOR THE LEGACY
[04:26:05] WE WILL LEAVE FOR THE PEOPLE THAT FOLLOW US.
[04:26:08] THEY DESERVE TO HAVE CLEAN WATER AND THEY DESERVE TO HAVE
[04:26:12] CLEAN AIR AND ALL THOSE THINGS THAT WE STRIVE FOR AND TO BE AS
[04:26:17] DISMISSIVE AS I SEE PEOPLE BEING TO WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY BOTHERS
[04:26:22] ME AS A PARENT AND AS A GRANDPARENT, IT BOTHERS ME.
[04:26:27] YOU KNOW, I -- I ALSO -- THE -- THIS -- THIS CONSTANT
[04:26:34] DEMONIZING OF THESE PROJECTS AND PARTICULARLY WHEN IT COMES TO
[04:26:39] THE PLACEMENT OF THESE PROJECTS IN CITY PARKS, WHICH, BY THE WAY,
[04:26:43] IS WHERE THEY GENERALLY ARE SITED. IT IS THE MOST COST-EFFICIENT
[04:26:50] AND IT IS THE -- IT IS THE EASIEST ONE AND IT MAKES -- I THINK
[04:26:54] JOHN WHO HAS SPOKEN HERE A NUMBER OF TIMES. EVERYTHING HE SAYS
[04:26:58] IS TRUE ABOUT THE ADVANTAGE OF THESE.
[04:27:00] THE OTHER THING THAT REALLY SURPRISES ME IS THAT IT IS NOT
[04:27:04] ONLY THE FACT THAT YOU CAN PUT IN A PROJECT THERE, WHICH IS
[04:27:08] UNDERGROUND. YOU WON'T SEE IT OR SMELL IT. THAT FIELD, BY THE
[04:27:12] WAY, WHICH IS ABOUT A SUBSTANDARD OF A FIELD YOU WANT TO SEE IN
[04:27:17] TERMS OF DRAINAGE AND TURF AND EVERYTHING ELSE. YOU KNOW, IT
[04:27:22] GETS REPLACED. THINGS -- IF -- AND SOME PEOPLE HERE IN THIS ROOM
[04:27:27] DID SOME OF THE LITTLE VISITS TO THE PARKS THERE. ONE OF THE
[04:27:30] PARKS WE VISITED, YOU WOULDN'T EVEN -- THE PROJECT HAD LONG BEEN
[04:27:35] COMPLETED. YOU WOULDN'T KNOW THERE WAS A PROJECT THERE. THE --
[04:27:39] AND THERE ARE MANY MORE NEIGHBORS SURROUNDING IT THAN WE WERE TO
[04:27:43] HAVE HERE. THEY WERE MAYBE 50 FEET AWAY THAT NEVER COMPLAINED
[04:27:48] DURING THE CONSTRUCTION AND CERTAINLY DIDN'T COMPLAIN AFTERWARDS
[04:27:51] BECAUSE NOT ONLY WAS THAT PARK RESTORED BUT IT WAS IMPROVED.
[04:27:57] AND SO I'M -- IT BOTHERS ME THAT WE ARE NOT BEING HONEST
[04:28:01] ABOUT THIS IN TERMS OF WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES OF DOING SOMETHING
[04:28:05] LIKE THAT, BY PUTTING IT IN THAT AREA. IT HAS TO DO WITH HOW YOU
[04:28:11] DO IT AND DO WITH MEASURES YOU TAKE IN TERMS OF SAFETY WHEN YOU
[04:28:16] DO IT BUT ULTIMATELY YOU CAN HAVE IN TERMS OF SOUTH PARK NOT ONLY
[04:28:20] IMPROVED PARK BUT COMPLETED PARK. YOU KNOW, THE MASTER PLAN FOR
[04:28:25] THAT PARK IS FAR FROM BEING COMPLETED. THE OTHER PROBLEM THAT I
[04:28:29] HAVE WITH THIS IS I JUST BELIEVE THAT THIS SOLUTION THAT YOU ARE
[04:28:34] LOOKING AT, EVERYBODY IS VERY HAPPY ABOUT THIS, IT IS ONE OF THE
[04:28:40] MOST -- THE LARGEST EXAMPLES I CAN THINK OF, OF A POLITICAL
[04:28:45] SOLUTION. IT IS GOING TO REQUIRE OTHER LOCAL ENTITIES, ELECTEDS,
[04:28:54] TO MAKE DECISIONS IN OUR FAVOR AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AND GROUPS
[04:28:58] AND BODIES TO MAKE DECISIONS IN OUR FAVOR AND STATE ELECTED
Page 75 of 94
[04:29:02] OFFICIALS TO GO BEYOND LIP SERVICE AND ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING IN
[04:29:06] AN -- WITH A SENSE OF IMMEDIACY TO SOLVE A PROBLEM. ALL THOSE
[04:29:13] THINGS AS THE CITY ATTORNEY HAS MENTIONED NEED TO FALL INTO PLACE
[04:29:17] FOR US TO -- THEN AT THE SAME TIME, WE MOVE IT OVER TO FRANCISCA
[04:29:23] STREET AND WE DON'T EVEN KNOW IF IT COULD TAKE 1/3 OF THE
[04:29:28] PROJECT. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THE SOIL SAMPLE WILL BE. SO WE KNOW
[04:29:31] AT THE END WE WILL END UP COMING BACK TO HERMOSA BEACH AS A
[04:29:37] LOCATION BECAUSE WE HAVE A PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY. WE WILL HAVE
[04:29:42] SPENT 1 MILLION OR MORE DOLLARS OF CITY MONEY AND WE ARE BACK TO
[04:29:47] SQUARE ONE. I WISH WE WOULD BE A LITTLE MORE HONEST ABOUT --
[04:29:52] ABOUT ONE, OUR CHANCES, AND TWO, THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THAT
[04:29:57] WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO DO THIS. IT WILL BE SOMEWHERE AND A
[04:30:02] CITY POPULIST AS WE ARE THAT SOMEBODY WON'T BE HAPPY ABOUT IN
[04:30:08] TERMS OF THIS DISRUPTION. IT MAY BE 12 MONTHS OF CONSTRUCTION.
[04:30:13] IT MIGHT BE, YOU KNOW, A LIFETIME OF ENHANCED BENEFITS IN
[04:30:18] RELATION TO THAT PARK. NO ONE IS BEING FAIR ABOUT THAT ARGUMENT.
[04:30:22] AND THAT IS WHAT BOTHERS ME. SO, YOU KNOW, I HAVE -- I WOULD
[04:30:27] HAVE PROBLEMS WITH, YOU KNOW, THE CITY ATTORNEY SAID IT. IT HAS
[04:30:32] BEEN HERE FOR A WHILE. HE KNOWS THE CITY PRETTY WELL THAT OPTION
[04:30:37] 3 IS ESSENTIALLY NO OPTION. I HAVE GREAT CONFIDENCE IN MY
[04:30:42] COLLEAGUES AND APPRECIATE ALL OF THE WORK THEY HAVE DONE.
[04:30:45] BASICALLY IT IS A SNARED ILLUSION IN MY MIND BECAUSE IT -- THE
[04:30:50] LIKELIHOOD OF US GETTING THE LEVEL OF APPROVALS AND HAVING IT
[04:30:54] MEET THE STANDARDS WE NEED THAT WILL SORT OF ABSOLVE US OF HAVING
[04:31:00] TO TAKE THE RESPONSIBILITY THAT IS OURS IN DOING THIS PROJECT ARE
[04:31:06] VERY UNLIKELY.
[04:31:07] SO I HAVE A HARD TROUBLE -- I WOULD HAVE A HARD TIME
[04:31:12] SUPPORTING THIS MOTION. I -- YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT WE HAVE TO
[04:31:17] BE HONEST HERE. WE ARE WHERE WE ARE. WHAT WE MAY END UP DOING
[04:31:21] IS WE WILL BE BACK HERE A YEAR OR SO LATER STARTING FROM SQUARE
[04:31:27] ONE AND IN THE MEANTIME 10 BILLION GALLONS OF FLUID AND TRASH AND
[04:31:33] WHATEVER WILL BE GOING DOWN THAT STORM DRAIN. WE WILL HAVE DONE
[04:31:37] NOTHING TO RESOLVE THAT. THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR.
[04:31:41] >> ALL RIGHT. COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY.
[04:31:44] >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. I SURE WISH WE HAD
[04:31:56] A BINDING COMMITMENT FROM REDONDO BEACH. I'M WILLING TO TRUST
[04:32:02] YOUR JUDGMENT THAT OPTION 3 IS VIABLE AND SUPPORTED, BUT --
[04:32:12] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[04:32:13] >> OH, SORRY.
[04:32:16] >> SOMEBODY NEEDS TO STEP UP AND GET THIS THING ACROSS THE
[04:32:20] FINISH LINE. WE JUST WENT THROUGH NORTH SCHOOL. WE HAD THE SAME
[04:32:25] NEED THERE. WE DID IT.
[04:32:28] WE NEED TO DO THE SAME THING HERE. WE CAN'T LET 6 MONTHS GO
[04:32:33] BY AGAIN. SO, MY PREFERENCE WOULD BE THAT WE PROPOSE TO AMEND
[04:32:40] THE MOU TO ALL OF THE PARTIES TO THE MOU RATHER THAN DISSOLVE IT
[04:32:47] BECAUSE I THINK AMENDING IT GIVES A BETTER CHANCE TO RETAIN THE
[04:32:51] GRANT FUNDING.
Page 76 of 94
[04:32:54] I THINK THAT WE NEED TO HAVE A VERY SPECIFIC PROPOSAL WITH
[04:32:59] RESPECT TO WHAT THE NEW MOU WILL LOOK LIKE WITH RESPECT TO
[04:33:03] PARTICULAR DEAL POINTS AND I THINK IT NEEDS TO CONTEMPLATE THAT
[04:33:08] THE OTHER PROJECTS IN THE EWIM WILL BE MOVED UP. THIS IS THE
[04:33:14] HIGHEST PRIORITY PROJECT AND IT WAS NO. 1 ON THE LIST. IF WE ARE
[04:33:19] GOING TO GO A DIFFERENT ROUTE WITH THIS PROJECT THERE IS NO
[04:33:22] REASON TO WAIT FOR THE OTHER PROJECTS WITH REGIONAL BOARD LOOKING
[04:33:26] OVER SHOULDERS TO GET REQUIREMENTS DONE TO MEET [INDISCERNIBLE].
[04:33:31] WE HAVE TO HAVE PART OF PROPOSAL PRIMARILY OTHER EWIM PROJECTS
[04:33:36] WITH SUPPORT WILL BE MOVED UP IN TERMS OF PRIORITY LIST. SECOND
[04:33:41] DEAL POINT NEEDS TO BE REDONDO OR TORRANCE OR REDONDO -- WITH
[04:33:49] RESPECT TO THIS PROJECT AT THE -- IN THIS WATER SHED.
[04:33:55] WE NEED TO COMMIT TO ASSISTING WITH THE PROPOSITION 1
[04:34:02] TRANSFER FOR REAPPLICATION, ASSISTING WITH ANY APPLICATION FOR
[04:34:07] MEASURE W FUNDS, KATHLEEN BROUGHT UP A GOOD POINT THAT LA IS
[04:34:12] FUNDING THEIR OWN STORM WATER PROJECTS THROUGH THEIR OWN MEASURE
[04:34:17] O DIGGING IN THEIR OWN PROJECT TO FUND THEIR OWN PROJECTS WE ARE
[04:34:21] DOING THE SAME THING THIS COUNCIL ENDORSED MEASURE W THAT JUST
[04:34:25] PASSED WITH I THINK MAJORITY SUPPORT IN HERMOSA BEACH I READ
[04:34:30] TODAY THAT THE COUNTY WILL START COLLECTING THAT PROPERTY TAX
[04:34:33] THIS JULY. JULY 1ST THIS FISCAL YEAR, I DON'T KNOW WHEN THE
[04:34:37] APPLICATION WINDOW OPENS, BUT MEASURE W IS A POT OF MONEY WE
[04:34:41] SHOULD BE SEEKING.
[04:34:43] WE ALSO NEED TO MAKE IT VERY CLEAR WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO
[04:34:48] GOING FORWARD IN ADDITION TO BEING A PARTICIPATING AGENCY ON
[04:34:52] LOOKING AT WHERE THIS PROJECT SHOULD BE LOCATED AND ASSISTING
[04:34:56] WITH WHAT. REDONDO BEACH HAS ASKED US TO DO, WHICH IS ASSISTING
[04:35:00] WITH THE REGIONAL BOARD AND KEEPING US IN COMPLIANCE WITH MS4
[04:35:05] PERMIT AND EWIM AND ASSISTING WITH FUNDING AND OTHERWISE. WE
[04:35:09] HAVE TO MAKE IT CRYSTAL CLEAR WE, THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, ARE
[04:35:14] WILLING TO SITE PROJECTS IN HERMOSA BEACH THAT CAPTURE OUR
[04:35:20] [INDISCERNIBLE] TO HERMOSA BEACH. CRYSTAL CLEAR I HEARD
[04:35:25] EVERYBODY OUT THERE, HEARD IN SPADES, WE BELIEVE IN CLEAN WATER
[04:35:29] AND ARE WILLING TO DO OUR PART. THE TIME TO DELIVER ON THAT IS
[04:35:32] COMING. IF WE ARE GOING TO GET REDONDO TO STEP UP AND TAKE THEIR
[04:35:38] CONTRIBUTION, WE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH EQUITY ABOUT THE PROPOSED
[04:35:42] PROJECT. IT IS CRYSTAL CLEAR THAT WE WILL DIFFER AND TAKE ON OUR
[04:35:47] CONTRIBUTION. THAT MEANS THERE MAY BE A SMALLER PROJECT ON THE
[04:35:51] GREENBELT, SOMETHING LIKE WHAT WE SEE AT PIER AVENUE INFILTRATION
[04:35:56] TRENCH OR SOMETHING WE SEE AT MANHATTAN BEACH AND BOUNDARY. AND
[04:36:01] SECOND, THAT WE HAVE ALL GONE AND LOOKED AT.
[04:36:04] WE ALSO NEED TO TELL THESE FOLKS THAT WE WILL PUT OR TELL
[04:36:08] OUR PARTNERS WE WILL PUT A WORK GROUP TOGETHER NOW TO MAKE SURE
[04:36:15] THAT WHEN THE TIME COMES, WE HAVE COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THE
[04:36:19] PROJECT THAT WILL BE IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE WON'T GO THROUGH THE
[04:36:23] WHOLE PROCESS OF CHANGING IT AND THEN TWO YEARS DOWN THE ROAD AND
[04:36:27] SAY, OKAY. NOW WE HAVE TO FIGURE OUT WHERE OUR PROJECT IS AND
Page 77 of 94
[04:36:30] GET OUT AHEAD OF THAT AND GET THESE FOLKS WHILE THEY ARE ENGAGED
[04:36:34] TO PARTNER WITH US AND OUR PARTNERS IN THE MOU TO PICK A PROJECT
[04:36:39] IN HERMOSA BEACH. IF THAT IS NECESSARY, IN THE EVENT WE CAN'T
[04:36:43] SITE A PROJECT, THAT CAPTURES 100% OF PROBLEM OF GREENBELT
[04:36:48] PROJECT OUTSIDE OF HERMOSA BEACH. SO THERE IS ADDITIONAL THINGS
[04:36:52] THAT MIGHT GO INTO THOSE DEAL POINTS, BUT ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2019,
[04:36:59] OUR STAFF MET WITH STAFF MEMBER IN REDONDO BEACH AND TORRANCE TO
[04:37:05] DISCUSS HOW TO PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT. THEY ASKED US IF MOU
[04:37:08] CAN'T BE EXECUTED, THIS COUNCIL NEEDS TO SEND A LETTER TO THEIR
[04:37:13] COUNCILS ASKING THEM TO DISSOLVE THE MOU AND FORFEIT THE GRANT.
[04:37:18] I DON'T THINK WE HAVE TO DO EXACTLY THAT. WE CAN -- SENATOR ALAN
[04:37:26] AND JANIS HAHN AND ANYBODY AND EVERYBODY AT HIGHER LEVELS OF
[04:37:31] GOVERNMENT TO RETAIN PROP 1 GRANT AND MAKE THIS A SEAMLESS
[04:37:36] TRANSITION. WE HAVE TO SEND THAT LETTER AND THAT LETTER HAS TO
[04:37:38] INCLUDE VERY SPECIFIC DIRECTION ABOUT HOW WE WANT TO PROCEED AND
[04:37:42] WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO TO FULFILL OUR OBLIGATION TO TAKE OUR
[04:37:46] CONTRIBUTION TO THAT STORM DRAIN AND DO SOMETHING WITH IT.
[04:37:50] SO I THANK YOU FOR ALL OF YOUR WORK. I DO WANT TO CLOSE BY
[04:37:56] ADDRESSING A FEW THINGS.
[04:37:58] THERE IS A LOT OF FEAR IN THIS ROOM AND LOTS OF FEAR IN THE
[04:38:03] COMMUNITY. FOR ME, THIS IS AN ISSUE OF EQUITY NOT SAFETY. WE
[04:38:10] HAVE HEARD CONCERNS ABOUT LIQUEFACTION AND NOISE AND CONCERNS
[04:38:15] ABOUT ODOR AND CONCERNS ABOUT TOXIC BUILDUP. IF YOU SAT THROUGH
[04:38:19] ALL OF THE MEETINGS AS I HAVE AND READ THE DOCUMENTS, THAT STUFF
[04:38:25] DOESN'T FIND A WHOLE LOT OF SUPPORT.
[04:38:28] SO THERE IS AN EQUITY PIECE HERE. THERE IS A PROJECT OF
[04:38:33] THIS SIZE HAS AN ISSUE WITH BEING A FOOT SHORT OF THE PERCOLATION
[04:38:38] DEPTH YOU WOULD WANT. THERE ARE CONSTRUCTION CONCERNS DEPENDING
[04:38:43] UPON YOUR LOCATION, THIS IS A 12 TO 18-MONTH PROJECT. WE KNOW
[04:38:48] TIMELINES ARE ELASTIC WHEN YOU GET INTO ACTUALLY BUILDING THEM
[04:38:52] AND ISSUES WITH ABOVE GROUND EQUIPMENT PUMP STATIONS AND CONTROLS
[04:38:58] AND THAT TYPE OF THING AND WHERE THEY WOULD GO AND IF THEY WILL
[04:39:01] BE OKAY THOSE ARE LEGITIMATE CONCERNS AS IS EQUITY OF HOW MUCH OF
[04:39:07] THE OUTFALL WE ARE TAKING ON IN TERMS OF HANDLING IT.
[04:39:14] COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS SAID LOTS OF WHAT HAS BEEN PUT OUT IN THE
[04:39:19] COMMUNITY THAT IS MAKING PEOPLE FEARFUL OF THE PROJECT DOESN'T
[04:39:23] STAND UP TO SCRUTINY WHEN YOU READ THE DOCUMENTATION AND WHEN YOU
[04:39:27] TALK TO THE EXPERTS AND WHEN YOU WATCH THE MEETINGS WE HAVE HAD.
[04:39:32] KEEP THAT IN MIND. MY HOPE IS AS IT ALWAYS HAS BEEN, THAT FOLKS
[04:39:36] STICK TO THE FACTS AND THAT WE UNDERSTAND WHAT THE IMPACTS OF
[04:39:40] THIS PROJECT WILL AND WON'T BE.
[04:39:43] NOT JUST FINANCIALLY BUT ENVIRONMENTALLY AND OTHERWISE.
[04:39:47] THAT IS THE ONLY WAY THAT WE MAKE PROPER DECISIONS FOR THE
[04:39:50] COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR.
[04:39:54] >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ONE SECOND. YES
[04:39:57] COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS.
[04:40:00] >> SO I'M CLEAR IN THIS, YOUR SUPPORT IS NOT TO INITIATE IT
Page 78 of 94
[04:40:04] AS A DISSOLUTION BUT TO INITIATE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT; IS
[04:40:08] THAT CORRECT?
[04:40:09] >> AMENDMENT ORDINANCE SOLUTION I WOULD SUGGEST THAT OUR
[04:40:13] LETTERS RECOMMEND AN AMENDMENT AS A MORE SEAMLESS TRANSITION BUT
[04:40:18] IN THE EVENT THAT OUR COUNTERPARTS AND MOU BELIEVE THAT
[04:40:23] DISSOLUTION IS THE WAY TO START AND REWRITE MOU FROM SCRATCH.
[04:40:27] THAT WOULD BE THE WAY TO GO.
[04:40:30] >> ALL RIGHT. MAYOR PRO TEM?
[04:40:33] >> YEAH. THIS IS ANOTHER QUESTION I HAD THAT COMES UP
[04:40:36] RIGHT NOW. THAT IS AND, IN THE OPINION OF ALL MY COLLEAGUES, IS
[04:40:41] THERE -- I UNDERSTAND THE AMENDMENT AND HOPE TO HANG ON TO THE
[04:40:46] FUNDING POTENTIALLY. I WONDER IF THE DISSOLUTION WILL PROVIDE
[04:40:53] MORE MOTIVATION TO COME TO THE TABLE AND TALK NEW OPTIONS.
[04:40:58] I GUESS I ASSUME THAT MEANS THERE IS SOME GUARANTEE WE WILL
[04:41:02] LOSE THE GRANT AWARD. IS THERE ANY WAY THAT WE COULD ACT NOW AND
[04:41:06] ACT EXTREMELY BOLDLY AND BRING ALL OF THE RESOURCES TO OUR BACK
[04:41:11] AND DO BOTH, DISSOLVE, RESET, AND MAINTAIN THAT HOPE OF FUNDING?
[04:41:20] BECAUSE WE HAVE, YOU KNOW, RALLIED A VERY STRONG AND AGGRESSIVE
[04:41:27] TIME SENSITIVE EFFORT TO GET THIS DONE, AS YOU SAID. I DON'T
[04:41:31] KNOW IF THAT IS POSSIBLE.
[04:41:33] >> MY TAKE ON IT IS ULTIMATELY THEY WOULD DECIDE. OUR
[04:41:38] RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO AMEND BECAUSE IT WOULD BE MORE
[04:41:41] SEAMLESS. EITHER WAY THAT WE DO IT, I WANT TO SEIZE THE
[04:41:45] INITIATIVE AND AFFIRMATIVELY GO FORWARD WITH WHAT WE RECOMMEND AS
[04:41:49] THE DIRECTION THAT ALL OF THE PARTIES OF MOU TAKE SO WE DON'T
[04:41:53] SPEND TIME WITHOUT A PROPOSAL ON THE TABLE. OUR INITIAL PROPOSAL
[04:41:57] WOULD BE TO AMEND. I THINK THAT IF WE CAN ALL AGREE ON BASIC
[04:42:04] TERMS OF REVISED MOU FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT, THERE IS NO REAL
[04:42:09] NEED FOR US TO JUST RESCIND THE MOU AND START FROM SCRATCH.
[04:42:19] >> ALL RIGHT. COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY?
[04:42:23] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. THANK YOU FOR EVERYONE THAT
[04:42:30] PROVIDED COMMENTS TODAY THAT IS HERE AND PROVIDED COMMENTS THAT
[04:42:34] WE RECEIVED BY E-MAIL. IT IS IMPORTANT FOR US TO ENGAGE WITH YOU
[04:42:39] AND HEAR WHAT YOUR CONCERNS ARE BEFORE WE MAKE DECISIONS. I
[04:42:42] APPRECIATE THE INPUT I GOT TODAY AND ALL DIALOGUE AND DISCUSSIONS
[04:42:47] AND MEETINGS I HAD BEFORE I CAME IN TODAY. I WANT TO THANK STAFF
[04:42:50] FOR INFORMATION PROVIDED IN STAFF REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS. THIS
[04:42:54] STUFF HAS BEEN GOING ON OBVIOUSLY FOR FIVE OR SIX YEARS AND
[04:42:57] BACKGROUND INFORMATION THAT I WAS APPRECIATIVE AND INFORMATION
[04:43:02] AVAILABLE TO MAKE THESE RECOMMENDATIONS TODAY. I DON'T KNOW IF
[04:43:06] IT HAS BEEN CLARIFIED. THERE IS LOTS OF INPUT RECEIVED ABOUT --
[04:43:11] WHICH I WASN'T TOO CRAZY ABOUT THAT WE HAVEN'T DONE THIS AND
[04:43:14] HAVEN'T DONE THAT AND GETTING A BUNCH OF F GRADES TODAY. I HEAR
[04:43:19] YOUR FRUSTRATION, BUT WE HAVE BEEN DOING A LOT AS A COUNCIL AND
[04:43:23] STAFF HAS BEEN DOING A LOT LAST FEW YEARS. THE MAYOR AND I
[04:43:27] STARTED CONVERSATIONS WITH REDONDO BEACH LATE LAST YEAR AND
[04:43:32] ATTEMPTING TO CONTINUE DIALOGUE WITH REDONDO BEACH AGAIN. I
Page 79 of 94
[04:43:35] THINK WE GOT A LETTER TODAY. WE REQUESTED IT TODAY, AND THEY
[04:43:39] KNOW WE HAVE OUR MEETING TONIGHT. IT WASN'T BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T
[04:43:42] BEEN TRYING DIALOGUE. I'M GLAD WE GOT THAT LETTER. I APOLOGIZE
[04:43:46] IT IS A LITTLE LATE IN THE GAME. IT IS NOT BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T
[04:43:49] BEEN APPROACHING THEM AND TRYING TO WORK THROUGH THESE ISSUES.
[04:43:52] AND I APPRECIATE THE COMMENTS THAT ARE PROVIDED FROM BOTH
[04:43:57] ENDS, KIDS TELLING US HOW IMPORTANT IT IS FOR US TO PROTECT OUR
[04:44:02] ENVIRONMENT FOR THEM AND OUR KIDS AND GRANDKIDS GOING FORWARD AND
[04:44:06] APPRECIATE CONCERN OF THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE CLOSE TO THE AREAS FOR
[04:44:09] PROPOSED LOCATIONS, AND I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS THAT ARE
[04:44:12] RAISED. I DO NOT, HOWEVER, APPRECIATE THE COMMENTARY THAT THE
[04:44:17] REASONS THESE PROJECTS ARE PROPOSED IS BECAUSE NONE OF US LIVE
[04:44:21] THERE. WE LIVE WITH YOU. WE ARE ALL A SMALL COMMUNITY. I HAVE
[04:44:24] BEEN TO A LOT OF YOUR HOUSES AND SOME HAVE BEEN TO MY HOUSE. WE
[04:44:28] ARE MAKING THE DECISION BEST FOR THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY AND ENTIRE
[04:44:32] HERMOSA BEACH AND NOT DISCOUNTING YOU LIVE IN A SPECIFIC AREA. I
[04:44:38] MENTIONED IN OTHER MEETINGS MUCH SMALLER SCALE GREEN STREET
[04:44:42] PROJECT THAT WAS PROPOSED THAT IS EXACTLY IN MY BACKYARD AND
[04:44:47] EXACTLY PROPERTY LINE OF GREEN STREET IS PROPERTY LINE OF MY
[04:44:50] HOUSE. I'M HAPPY TO HAVE THAT INSTALLED. I HOPE THE CITY CAN
[04:44:54] PUT IT TOGETHER, AND I HAVE NO OPPOSITION TO IT. WHEN I HAVE YOU
[04:44:57] HEAR COMMENTS IF IT WASN'T IN YOUR BACKYARD, YOU WOULDN'T DO IT,
[04:45:01] I RESENT THIS COMMENTARY. I DON'T THINK IT APPLIES TO ANY OF US
[04:45:05] OR THE FIVE THAT ARE HERE THAT ARE MAKING THIS DECISION TONIGHT.
[04:45:08] SO I HEAR THE COMMENTS FROM MY COLLEAGUES. YOU KNOW, JEFF
[04:45:12] IS OBVIOUSLY VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THESE ISSUES AND IS PROBABLY
[04:45:17] INVOLVED WITH THE ISSUES LONGER THAN MANY OF US UP HERE. I HEAR
[04:45:22] JUSTIN'S COMMENTS BEING REALISTIC. WE ARE A CITY. THERE ARE 88
[04:45:27] CITIES IN LA COUNTY. WE HAVE TO MAKE DECISIONS AND MEET OUR
[04:45:31] OBLIGATIONS. I HEARD IT. I HEARD THIS IN A PRESENTATION I WAS
[04:45:34] AT A COUPLE WEEKS AGO THAT STUCK WITH ME. BASED ON THIS PROJECT,
[04:45:38] AS ELECTED OFFICIALS, IT IS NOT OUR JOB TO TELL THE PEOPLE THAT
[04:45:43] VOTED FOR US WHAT THEY WANT TO HEAR. IT IS OUR JOB TO TELL YOU
[04:45:46] WHAT YOU NEED TO HEAR. IN THIS CASE, WHAT YOU NEED TO HEAR IS WE
[04:45:50] CAN'T JUST SIMPLY TELL REDONDO BEACH TO TAKE ON THAT OBLIGATION.
[04:45:55] IT IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY. WE CAN'T DO THAT. IT IS NOT AN
[04:45:58] OPTION THE CITY ATTORNEY SPELLED OUT. DOING NOTHING IS NOT AN
[04:46:03] OPTION. WE CAN'T MEET AND TELL COUNCIL TO DO YOUR JOB AND FIND
[04:46:08] ANOTHER PLACE FOR IT. THAT IS WISHFUL THINKING. WE HAVE TO FIND
[04:46:11] ALTERNATIVES THAT WORK AND SATISFY OUR OBLIGATIONS AS A CITY AND
[04:46:17] WORK -- WORK BETTER FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND BETTER FOR PEOPLE THAT
[04:46:20] LIVE IN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUT CAN'T IGNORE IT AND HOPE IT
[04:46:24] GOES AWAY OR DEFLECT OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO ANOTHER CITY. I HEAR
[04:46:28] COMMENTS AND INPUT JUSTIN PROVIDED. I HOPE YOU HAVE IT WRITTEN
[04:46:32] DOWN BECAUSE I'M SUPPORTIVE OF COMMENTS YOU MENTIONED. WE HAVE
[04:46:35] TO HAVE A CLEAR GUIDELINE WHERE WE ARE GOING AND NEED TO HAVE A
[04:46:39] CLEAR PUSH ON THE SCHEDULE SO THAT WE ARE NOT SITTING AROUND AND
Page 80 of 94
[04:46:43] HAVING DISCUSSION THREE OR SIX MONTHS FROM NOW. I THINK MAYOR
[04:46:47] AND I HAVE DONE OUR EFFORTS TO ENGAGE WITH REDONDO BEACH AND NOW
[04:46:53] WE HAVE SPECIFIC PARAMETERS PROVIDED TO US TO CONTINUE ENGAGEMENT
[04:46:59] AND WORK WITH STAFF AND CONSULTANTS GOING FORWARD TO GET
[04:47:03] SUBSTANTIVE ON ACTUAL PLAN WE ARE PROPOSING, BUT, I THINK, THAT
[04:47:07] IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE WE HAVE FOR REASONS MAYOR MENTIONED WHEN
[04:47:11] WE FIRST STARTED CONVERSATION. WE HEAR AND UNDERSTAND OPTION 1
[04:47:15] IS NOT A VIABLE OPTION. WE CANNOT GO WITH OPTION 2. THERE ARE
[04:47:19] LOTS OF THE MISSING FACTS AND PIECES AT THIS STAGE. WE DON'T
[04:47:23] HAVE INFORMATION TO SUPPORT OPTION 2. OPTION 3, AND WITH ALL
[04:47:27] PARAMETERS, AGAIN, JUSTIN LISTED OUT, WE CAN PUT SOMETHING
[04:47:32] TOGETHER TO ALL MOVE FORWARD WITH, AND I WILL FINAL -- I WILL END
[04:47:35] THIS BY SAYING I HAVE HEARD SINCE MARCH OF LAST YEAR THIS HAS
[04:47:41] BEEN GOING ON FOR A YEAR. ONE OF THE SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS I AM
[04:47:44] HEARING FROM THE COMMUNITY IS WE DON'T LET YOU ALL KNOW WHAT IS
[04:47:47] GOING ON AND WE DON'T GIVE YOU ENOUGH NOTICE OR PROVIDE YOU WITH
[04:47:51] ENOUGH INFORMATION OF WHAT WE ARE DOING. YOU ARE RIGHT. WE
[04:47:55] HAVEN'T DONE ENOUGH. I WILL ASK STAFF AND IF MAYOR WANTS US TO
[04:47:59] BE MORE INVOLVED IN PUTTING IN MONTHLY UPDATES OR PRESS RELEASES
[04:48:03] OR WHATEVER. IT IS SOMETHING WE NEED TO DO. WE ARE NOT GIVING
[04:48:06] YOU ENOUGH INFORMATION WHAT WE ARE DOING OR NOTIFYING YOU ENOUGH.
[04:48:09] THE CITY MANAGER HAS LATELY PUT IN PERIODIC UPDATES IN CITY
[04:48:14] MANAGER UPDATES, WHICH I APPRECIATE, BUT WE HAVE TO HAVE MORE
[04:48:17] DIALOGUE IF WE NEED TO SEND SPECIFIC MAILERS TO THOSE THAT LIVE
[04:48:22] IN THE COMMUNITY MAILBOX DON'T HAVE TO WAIT TO GET IT COST AND
[04:48:26] TIME INVOLVED TO DO THAT, BUT I -- EVERY TIME I MEET WITH
[04:48:29] SOMEBODY OR TALK ON THE PHONE, THE FIRST COMMENT I GET IS YOU ARE
[04:48:32] NOT LETTING US KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON, NOT LISTENING TO US, AND
[04:48:37] GIVING US AN OPPORTUNITY TO VOICE CONCERNS AND THOUGHTS TO ME
[04:48:41] THAT IS IMPORTANT. YOU MAY NOT -- I MAY NOT AGREE WITH YOUR
[04:48:45] CONCERNS. AT END OF THE DAY, I OWE IT TO YOU TO LISTEN TO IT.
[04:48:49] IF YOU DON'T KNOW, YOU CAN'T TELL YOUR THOUGHTS, AND WE CAN'T
[04:48:54] LISTEN TO YOUR CONCERNS THAT. IS NOT THE WAY WE SHOULD DO IT.
[04:48:58] THANK YOU.
[04:48:59] >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU TO MY COLLEAGUES FOR YOUR INPUT.
[04:49:02] I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY. I MEAN, AS MUCH
[04:49:07] AS I WANT TO BE APART OF THIS AND DRIVE THIS AND I'M VERY
[04:49:10] MOTIVATED TO DO THAT, I ALSO HEAR FROM YOU OBVIOUSLY YOUR
[04:49:15] CONCERN. YOU GAVE A LOT OF GREAT PARAMETERS. WE ARE WILLING TO
[04:49:20] WORK WITH THOSE PARAMETERS AND DRIVE IT AND BRING IT HOME. THAT
[04:49:23] WILL BE OUR GOAL. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE ON THE SUB-COMMITTEE,
[04:49:27] I'M HAPPY TO STEP BACK AND ALLOW YOU TO HAVE THAT OPPORTUNITY.
[04:49:30] >> I AM TOO, BY THE WAY.
[04:49:33] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[04:49:34] >> I DON'T KNOW WITH THIS GUY. I DON'T KNOW.
[04:49:38] >> [INDISCERNIBLE].
[04:49:39] >> I TRUST YOU BOTH. I THINK THAT WITHIN THE CONFINES OF
Page 81 of 94
[04:49:42] THE BROWN ACT, WHICH I THINK THE FOLKS IN THE ROOM ARE PROBABLY
[04:49:47] INTIMATELY INVOLVED ENOUGH WITH THIS AND TALKED TO US AND
[04:49:51] UNDERSTAND WE AND THE OTHER THREE COUNCILMEMBERS ARE NOT PRIVY TO
[04:49:55] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION YOU MADE TONIGHT UNTIL WE HEARD IT FROM
[04:50:00] YOU TONIGHT WITH BROWN ACT. IT HAS TO BE A TEAM EFFORT WITH FIVE
[04:50:05] OF US WITH OUTREACH TO JANIS HAHN AND SENATOR ALAN. I THINK
[04:50:12] THERE IS A WAY DO THAT VIA STAFF, BUT I TRUST YOU. YOU ARE BOTH
[04:50:18] VERY SMART AND YOU HAVE GOOD WORKING RELATIONSHIPS WITH ALL OF
[04:50:21] OUR COUNTERPARTS IN THE BEACH CITIES WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GROUP
[04:50:27] AND MOU. I'M FULLY SUPPORTIVE IN HOWEVER YOU WANT, BUT I TRUST
[04:50:34] YOU GOING FORWARD.
[04:50:36] >> OKAY. WE BETTER DELIVER.
[04:50:38] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[04:50:40] >> YEAH. WE DON'T TAKE THAT RESPONSIBILITY LIGHTLY. WE
[04:50:43] WILL DELIVER. ALL RIGHT. LET'S NOT CELEBRATE YET. WE WILL STAY
[04:50:49] VERY POSITIVE AND WORK VERY HARD ON OUR COLLECTIVE BEHALF. WITH
[04:50:52] THAT, DO WE HAVE A MOTION, COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY?
[04:50:57] >> SURE, MADAME MAYOR.
[04:50:59] >> THANK YOU.
[04:51:01] >> PARDON ME. I MOVE THAT WE INITIATE AN AMENDMENT OR
[04:51:10] DISSOLUTION OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING
[04:51:14] GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT TO NEGOTIATE SUITABLE SUBSTITUTE
[04:51:19] OR REVISED MOU AND PROJECT WITH THE CITY'S PARTNERS.
[04:51:28] >> ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
[04:51:31] >> I'LL SECOND.
[04:51:33] >> ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[04:51:37] >> AYE.
[04:51:39] >> OPPOSED?
[04:51:40] >> NO.
[04:51:41] >> ALL RIGHT.
[04:51:42] >> ALTHOUGH, LET ME ADD.
[04:51:43] >> YES.
[04:51:44] >> I WILL HELP MY COLLEAGUES IN EVERY WAY POSSIBLE TO MAKE
[04:51:47] SURE WE ARE SUCCESSFUL.
[04:51:48] >> THANK YOU. THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH FOR BEING HERE. WE
[04:51:51] WILL TAKE A QUICK FIVE OR SEVEN-MINUTE BREAK. WE WILL BE BACK AT
[05:00:17] --.
[05:00:18] >> [HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL IN RECESS].
[05:03:36] >> ALL RIGHT. PAGING COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY. THANK YOU,
[05:03:41] KIND SIR.
[05:03:42] >> MADAM MAYOR, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE
[05:03:46] CONTINUE THE MEETING TO 11 O'CLOCK.
[05:03:48] >> DO HAVE A SECOND?
[05:03:50] >> SECOND.
[05:03:51] >> ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[05:03:53] >> AYE.
[05:03:54] >> ALL RIGHT. MADAME CLERK?
Page 82 of 94
[05:03:57] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. WE WILL GO BACK TO THE CONSENT
[05:04:01] CALENDAR ITEMS NOW OR MOVE AHEAD. WHAT WOULD YOU PREFER?
[05:04:05] >> MOVE AHEAD.
[05:04:07] >> MOVING AHEAD IS JUST MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS, WHICH ARE
[05:04:12] IMPORTANT, COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY, BUT LET'S GO TO THE CONSENT
[05:04:16] CALENDAR.
[05:04:17] >> YEAH.
[05:04:18] >> SO WE HAD --
[05:04:19] >> IT WAS J, L, AND P; CORRECT?
[05:04:25] >> YES.
[05:04:26] >> ALL RIGHT. ITEM 2J, THIS WAS PULLED BY COUNCILMEMBER
[05:04:33] FANGARY ACTION PUBLIC WORKS MINUTES OF JANUARY 16, 2016.
[05:04:44] >> THANK YOU. SO I PULLED THIS ITEM SPECIFICALLY. THIS IS
[05:04:48] OBVIOUSLY -- THIS IS THE ACTION MINUTES FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS
[05:04:52] COMMISSION. I PULLED THIS ITEM SPECIFICALLY FOR ITEM NO. I GUESS
[05:05:09] 8B, WHICH IS THE REQUEST TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO NOT
[05:05:14] INSTALL BALLARDS ON THE STRAND AT 11TH STREET AND ACCEPT
[05:05:19] INSTALLATION OF PAVEMENT MARKINGS INSTEAD TO KEEP THE
[05:05:23] INTERSECTION CLEAR. SO I -- SO JUST TO GIVE MY COLLEAGUES A
[05:05:28] QUICK BACKGROUND, THIS IS RELATING TO BALLARDS ON THE STRAND. I
[05:05:33] HAD TO GO BACK AND DO SOME HOMEWORK ON OUR PRIOR POSITION. IN
[05:05:39] FEBRUARY 2016, THIS COUNCIL ACCEPTED THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF
[05:05:42] PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION TO INSTALL BALLARDS AT 6 DIFFERENT
[05:05:48] ENTRANCES AT THE STRAND. I HAD TO GO BACK AND LOOK AT STAFF
[05:05:52] REPORT PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION OF JANUARY OF THIS YEAR. LOOKS
[05:05:56] LIKE THAT RECOMMENDATION HAS CHANGED AND GATES BEING DESIGNED AND
[05:06:01] POTENTIALLY INSTALLED. I GOT WORD THINGS GOING ON, ON COUNCIL
[05:06:07] NOT AUTHORIZED WITH COUNCIL AND INCONSISTENT WITH COUNCIL
[05:06:12] DIRECTION AND HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH PUBLIC WORKS AND CITY MANAGER
[05:06:17] AND MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THESE BEING EVALUATED TO PUBLIC WORKS
[05:06:21] COMMISSION WILL BE BROUGHT TO COUNCIL FOR EVALUATION AND
[05:06:24] DISCUSSION BEFORE THEY IMPLEMENT IT. I WANT TO MAKE SURE TO
[05:06:28] CONFIRM THAT IS CURRENT STATUS APPEARED LOOKING TO ME PUBLIC
[05:06:32] WORKS STAFF REPORT THIS YEAR AND RECOMMENDATION SPECIFICALLY
[05:06:36] REGARDING 11TH STREET. IT WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY LINKED TO HAVING
[05:06:39] IT BEING BROUGHT TO COUNCIL FOR DIRECTION. I WANT TO CLARIFY AND
[05:06:44] MAKE SURE THAT IS THE CASE. THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING POTENTIALLY
[05:06:48] MENTION ON BEHALF OF -- IF MY COLLEAGUES DON'T HAVE OTHER
[05:06:53] COMMENTS, I WANT TO CONFIRM THAT IS THE DIRECTION GOING FORWARD,
[05:06:57] AND I MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES.
[05:07:01] >> I WILL SECOND.
[05:07:05] >> GOOD EVENING.
[05:07:07] >> OH.
[05:07:08] >> I WANT TO -- YES. THAT IS CORRECT. THIS WAS DONE IN
[05:07:11] TWO PARTS APPROACHING PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION IN NOVEMBER AND IN
[05:07:17] JANUARY.
[05:07:18] AND UNDER DIFFERENT -- A DIFFERENT DIRECTOR, SO WHAT I --
Page 83 of 94
[05:07:24] WHAT I WAS ABLE TO PULL TODAY ARE THE INFORMATION THAT WE SHOULD
[05:07:31] -- I FEEL WE SHOULD REVISIT PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION TO GET A
[05:07:35] BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE DESIGN OF PLANS FOR -- FOR THE
[05:07:43] BALLARDS, AND WE NEED TO COME BACK TO COUNCIL FOR THE RESOLUTION
[05:07:48] THAT NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO -- TO COASTAL COMMISSION FOR THE
[05:07:55] PERMIT THAT WE NEED.
[05:07:56] >> OKAY. THANK YOU. SINCE YOU ARE HERE, I HAVE A QUICK
[05:08:01] QUESTION FOR YOU. I -- THROUGH MY EVALUATION OF THE STAFF REPORT
[05:08:04] AND DISCUSSIONS WITH PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSIONERS, I HAVEN'T BEEN
[05:08:08] ABLE TO GRASP A GOOD CONCEPT OF IT. IN THE STAFF REPORTS FOR THE
[05:08:13] PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY MEETING, THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO MARK THE
[05:08:18] AREA ON THE STRAND BY ELEVENTH STREET AND BASICALLY PAINT ON THE
[05:08:24] STRAND FLOOR, KEEP CLEAR. AS I LOOK AT THE PICTURE IN THE STAFF
[05:08:30] REPORT, IT IS HARD FOR ME TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT WOULD MEAN TO A
[05:08:34] PEDESTRIAN WALKING ON THE STRAND. I KNOW WHAT KEEP CLEAR MEANS
[05:08:40] DRIVING CAR STOP LIGHT AND KEEP IT DIRECTLY SO CARS CAN GO ACROSS
[05:08:45] WHILE WAITING FOR THE LIGHT BUT DON'T KNOW WHAT IT MEANS TO
[05:08:49] PEDESTRIANS WHAT IMPACT IT WILL HAVE, AND I DIDN'T WATCH THE
[05:08:53] MEETING ON PUBLIC WORKS IN JANUARY. I'M MISSING AN EXPLANATION
[05:08:56] THERE. I'M LEFT WITH A PUZZLING LOOK WHEN I LOOK AT THAT
[05:09:00] PICTURE. IF I WALK ON THE STRAND OR 11TH STREET AND THERE'S A
[05:09:03] SIGN ON THE SAND THAT SAYS KEEP CLEAR, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN, STOP
[05:09:07] OR WAIT? AN EXPLANATION I GOT WAS MAYBE SHOULDN'T LOITER AROUND.
[05:09:12] EMERGENCY CARS CAN USE THAT TO GO THROUGH TO THE BEACH. SINCE
[05:09:16] I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH IT, I DON'T KNOW HOW OUR RESIDENTS OR
[05:09:19] VISITORS WOULD UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MEANS. I WOULD LIKE WHEN HE
[05:09:22] COMES BACK DO US FOR CONSIDERATION OR UNLESS YOU WANT TO RESPOND
[05:09:26] TO IT NOW AN EXPLANATION WHY THAT WAS RECOMMENDED AND HOW
[05:09:29] COMFORTABLE WE ARE THAT WILL BE EFFECTIVE AND UNDERSTOOD BY OUR
[05:09:34] RESIDENTS OR VISITORS MARK ON STRAND FLOOR KEEP CLEAR AND HOW
[05:09:39] MESSAGE WILL GET ACROSS.
[05:09:41] >> COUNCILMEMBER, IF I MAY, I THINK SINCE WE DON'T HAVE
[05:09:44] BENEFIT OF A FULL STAFF REPORT, WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GIVE YOU
[05:09:47] BITS AND PIECES OF WHAT THE THINKING WAS FROM THE PRIOR TIMES WE
[05:09:53] HAVE GONE TO COMMISSION. I THINK IT WOULD BE BEST FOR US TO
[05:09:57] REGROUP AND BRING THE ITEM FORWARD TO THE COUNCIL AND HAVE A FULL
[05:10:01] DISCUSSION. THERE ARE CHALLENGES WITH THE BALLARDS WE WERE ABLE
[05:10:05] TO SHARE WITH YOU THAT WERE NOT ANTICIPATED NECESSARILY WHEN
[05:10:10] BALLARDS WERE SELECTED THOSE ARE UPDATES WE WOULD LIKE TO BRING
[05:10:14] TO YOU. YOU ARE RIGHT MESSAGING KEEP CLEAR WHAT COULD THAT
[05:10:19] POSSIBLY MEAN? WE WILL AFTER LOOKING AT RECOMMENDATIONS WE CAN
[05:10:25] HAVE A DIFFERENT SIGNAGE OR HAVE EXPLANATION WITH YOU WHAT
[05:10:28] GENERAL INTERPRETATION OF THAT COULD MEAN. I HAVE INTERPRETATION
[05:10:33] I WOULD STAY CLEAR OF THAT AREA IF SHARING WITH ME. THAT MIGHT
[05:10:37] NOT BE GENERAL INTERPRETATION. WE WILL HAVE TO LOOK AT THAT ON
[05:10:41] THE FLY [INDISCERNIBLE] HAS DONE A GREAT JOB TO PULL TOGETHER
[05:10:44] RESPONSES. I WANT TO THANK HIM FOR THAT. I THINK WE SHOULD COME
Page 84 of 94
[05:10:49] BACK TO YOU MORE PROPERLY AND FORMALLY.
[05:10:51] >> UNDERSTOOD. WITH THAT, IF NONE OF MY COLLEAGUES HAVE
[05:10:54] ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS, I CAN --
[05:10:56] >> MAKE A MOTION.
[05:10:57] >> I CAN MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE
[05:11:00] PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION.
[05:11:02] >> I'LL SECOND IT.
[05:11:03] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[05:11:05] >> AYE.
[05:11:07] >> MADAM CLERK?
[05:11:09] >> THANK YOU. NEXT IS -- OOPS. THERE IT IS. ITEM 2L,
[05:11:18] AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR CIP 17687 AND CIP 18691 ADA
[05:11:27] IMPROVEMENTS ON PROSPECT AVENUE AND THIS WAS ALSO PULLED BY
[05:11:33] COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY. THANK YOU.
[05:11:36] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. I JUST WANT A QUICK CORRECTION
[05:11:39] THAT IT REQUESTS 2I. I DID IT INCORRECTLY. 2L IS THE CORRECT
[05:11:43] NUMBER. THANKS FOR CATCHING MY ERROR THERE. THE ONLY REASON FOR
[05:11:47] PULLING THIS ITEM OUT OF CONSENT WAS PROCEDURALLY WE HAVE ADOPTED
[05:11:51] A PROTOCOL BACK IN 2017 FOR CONTRACTING PURPOSES ANY CONTRACT
[05:11:57] AMOUNTS THAT EXCEED $100,000 SHOULDN'T BE PUT ON CONSENT ITEM PUT
[05:12:03] BROUGHT TO MUSICAL MATTERS. I DON'T HAVE ISSUES OR CONCERN WITH
[05:12:06] THIS CONTRACT EXCEPT, AGAIN, PROCEDURALLY THAT IS OUR PROTOCOL.
[05:12:11] I WANTED TO PULL THE ITEM OUT AND SCOPE OF WORK DEALT WITH ADA
[05:12:17] IMPROVEMENTS GOOD TO GIVE RESIDENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS WE ARE
[05:12:26] IMPROVING ADA IMPROVEMENTS. IT DOESN'T HURT TO HAVE IT RATHER AS
[05:12:31] A CONSENT ITEM. THAT IS ONLY REASON I BROUGHT IT OUT. AGAIN,
[05:12:35] UNLESS COLLEAGUES HAVE QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS OR DISCUSSIONS ABOUT
[05:12:38] IT, I'M HAPPY TO MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THAT AWARD OF
[05:12:42] CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR CIP 17687 AND CIP 18691.
[05:12:50] >> OKAY.
[05:12:51] >> YEAH. MAYOR PRO TEM?
[05:12:54] >> EXCUSE ME. WE DO HAVE SOMEONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK
[05:12:56] ON THIS ITEM.
[05:12:57] >> OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[05:12:59] >> DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION?
[05:13:01] >> I DO HAVE A QUESTION. I GUESS, WELL, I -- IT COULD WAIT
[05:13:06] UNTIL AFTER PUBLIC COMMENT. IT WAS ABOUT THE PROTOCOL. I WILL
[05:13:10] WAIT.
[05:13:11] >> UNDERSTOOD. OKAY. WE WILL OPEN IT UP. GOOD EVENING.
[05:13:18] >> HI. I'M KEN [INDISCERNIBLE] ON 522 PROSPECT. I SENT
[05:13:23] YOU ALL A LETTER BACK IN AUGUST 2015 ABOUT THIS PROJECT. I WANT
[05:13:27] TO THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT. TRAFFIC MOVES PRETTY QUICK.
[05:13:31] LOTS OF KIDS IN THAT AREA.
[05:13:33] I HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH FABIO AND KIND OF GETTING UPDATES.
[05:13:38] HE HAS BEEN GREAT ON LETTING ME KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON IT TAKE
[05:13:43] AIDES WHILE TO GET SOME OF THESE THINGS DONE. JUSTIN YOU ALWAYS
[05:13:47] LET ME HAVE YOUR EAR ON THIS TOPIC. I WANT TO THANK YOU ABOUT IT
Page 85 of 94
[05:13:51] TOO. WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT TIMES. I HOPE IT GETS APPROVED AND
[05:13:56] MOVED FORWARD SOON. THANK YOU.
[05:13:57] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYONE ELSE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT?
[05:14:01] ALL RIGHT. SEEING NO ONE. I WILL BRING IT BACK FOR A MOTION OR
[05:14:06] SORRY.
[05:14:07] >> QUESTION.
[05:14:08] >> YOU HAD A QUESTION, MAYOR PRO TEM?
[05:14:11] >> YEAH. ACTUALLY, I WANT TO RE-ENFORCE COUNCILMEMBER
[05:14:16] FANGARY'S. WHEN I SAW THIS AND EVERY TIME I SEE ONE THAT EXCEEDS
[05:14:20] OUR PROTOCOL, I THINK OF YOU. WHEN I WONDERED WHEN I LOOKED AT
[05:14:25] THIS ONE IS WHETHER OR NOT OUR PROTOCOL HAD ANY NUANCES. FOR
[05:14:31] EXAMPLE, THESE WERE MAYBE BUNDLED INTO ALL KINDS OF STREET
[05:14:35] IMPROVEMENTS AND SEVERAL ROUNDS OF THAT. IF THAT WOULD BE MAYBE
[05:14:38] -- THERE WOULD BE LESS OF A NEED TO PULL THOSE OUT OF CONSENT.
[05:14:43] BUT ON THE OTHER HAND, I ACTUALLY LIKE THE FACT THAT IT IS
[05:14:48] BEING HIGHLIGHTED. IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CIP IMPROVEMENT THAT DOES
[05:14:53] MAKE A DIFFERENCE. IT IS -- YOU KNOW, IT IS NOT A SMALL PROJECT.
[05:14:58] THAT IS JUST MY WEIGHING IN. I DON'T -- I'M NOT ARGUING TO
[05:15:02] CHANGE THE PROTOCOL. I'M TRYING TO GET CLARIFICATION ON THE
[05:15:05] PROTOCOL, I GUESS.
[05:15:08] >> MADAME CITY MANAGER?
[05:15:11] >> SO I THINK IF I'M UNDERSTANDING COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY
[05:15:16] CORRECTLY, THE PROTOCOL THAT COUNCILMEMBER IS REFERRING TO IS
[05:15:20] PART OF A STRATEGIC PLANNING LEADERS THAT I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS
[05:15:26] CALLED THE LEADERS GUIDE. LEADERS GUIDE FROM 2016/2017.
[05:15:32] AT THAT TIME, THE DESCRIPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR REALLY
[05:15:41] CAME UP AS A GUIDELINE FOR WHEN COUNCILMEMBERS WOULD PULL ITEMS
[05:15:45] OFF OF CONSENT. UNDER THAT, IT IDENTIFIED FOUR OR FIVE
[05:15:51] CATEGORIES OR PROTOCOLS AS TO WHAT WOULD BE ON CONSENT. ONE IS
[05:15:58] THE LAST ONE IS ITEMS WITH AN EXPENDITURE THRESHOLD OF $100,000.
[05:16:04] AND SO THIS, OF COURSE, VARIES ACROSS CITIES. THAT IS WHAT
[05:16:08] WAS CONSIDERED AT THE TIME. WHAT I WANTED TO SHARE ABOUT THIS
[05:16:12] PARTICULAR PROJECT IS NOT BECAUSE IT OVERLOOKED THE PROTOCOL, BUT
[05:16:19] THIS -- THIS IS A PROJECT WHERE TWICE BEFORE IT HAS COME BEFORE
[05:16:23] THE COUNCIL THROUGH THE CDBG FUNDING. WE BUNDLED THE FUNDS FOR
[05:16:29] TWO YEARS, BUT THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED AND COUNCIL HAS
[05:16:32] APPROVED IT TWICE BEFORE. IN THAT REGARD, UNDER THE DISCRETION
[05:16:37] THAT I THINK YOU HAVE GIVEN ME, I'M PRETTY SURE YOU HAVE GIVEN
[05:16:40] ME, I'M ABLE TO INTERPRET THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY
[05:16:44] ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL. SO PLACING IT ON CONSENT IS NOT OUT OF
[05:16:50] LINE WITH YOUR DIRECTION, YOUR APPROVAL.
[05:16:53] I THINK THERE IS ALSO PERHAPS A CONCERN ABOUT WHAT IS A
[05:16:57] ROUTINE MATTER AND WHAT IS NOT.
[05:17:00] THERE IS NO DEFINITION OF ROUTINE HERE. I THINK IF WE LOOK
[05:17:04] ACROSS CITIES THAT DO HAVE SOME HANDBOOK FOR COUNCILMEMBERS AND
[05:17:09] MAYORS AND COUNCILMEMBERS ON VARIOUS MATTERS AND HOW TO CONDUCT
[05:17:14] MEETINGS AND PULL CONSENT ITEMS I DON'T THINK THERE IS A
Page 86 of 94
[05:17:19] DEFINITION WHAT ROUTINE IS. THAT IS REALLY KIND OF DIFFICULT TO
[05:17:23] DEFINE.
[05:17:24] AND SO AS A STAFF PERSON AND AS YOUR STAFF PERSON, WHAT I
[05:17:28] WOULD DO IS LOOK TO WHETHER IT WAS SOMETHING YOU HAVE WEIGHED IN
[05:17:31] ON PREVIOUSLY AND YOU HAVE GIVEN CLEAR DIRECTION. IF IT IS
[05:17:35] SOMETHING THAT IS A LEGISLATIVE MATTER, WHETHER WE ARE
[05:17:38] RECOMMENDING A SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION POSITION ON A BILL. IF IT
[05:17:42] IS IN ALIGNMENT WITH YOUR POLICIES AND YOUR DIRECTION, THAT WOULD
[05:17:47] BE A ROUTINE MATTER FROM STAFF'S STANDPOINT. SO THAT IS WHERE
[05:17:51] THIS ITEM FOR $141,000 APPEARS BEFORE YOU. IT APPEARED BEFORE
[05:17:56] YOU IN TWO PIECES ABOUT $70,000 EACH PREVIOUSLY.
[05:18:02] >> OKAY. THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR.
[05:18:06] >> MY FOLLOW UP COMMENT WOULD BE THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I WAS
[05:18:10] REACHING FOR AND WHAT I TAKE AWAY FROM YOUR COMMENTS, YOUR
[05:18:13] ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IS THAT I KNOW THAT SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES
[05:18:18] HAVE ON OCCASION NOT PULLED AN ITEM, BUT THEY HAVE MADE A COMMENT
[05:18:24] AS WE ARE APPROVING THE CONSENT CALENDAR WHERE THEY MIGHT CALL
[05:18:28] OUT SOMETHING LIKE A SIGNIFICANT, YOU KNOW, MAKE A COMMENT
[05:18:33] INSTEAD OF PULL IT.
[05:18:35] SO THAT FEELS RIGHT TO ME JUST FOR CONSIDERATION. YOU
[05:18:40] HAVING THE JUDGMENT TO PUT IT ON CONSENT MAKES SENSE TO ME. IF
[05:18:44] THERE IS ANY ADDED VALUE TO KIND OF BE ABLE TO HIGHLIGHT IF WE
[05:18:50] FEEL IT IS IMPORTANT TO THE COMMUNITY, I WOULD BE COMFORTABLE
[05:18:53] WITH THAT PROTOCOL.
[05:18:56] >> MADAM MAYOR, IF I MAY?
[05:18:57] >> YES.
[05:18:58] >> I WOULDN'T BE COMFORTABLE WITH THE PROTOCOL. NEITHER
[05:19:02] ONE OF YOU WAS IN THE DISCUSSION. I WILL BRING IT AROUND, JEFF
[05:19:05] AND JUSTIN, AND I HAD FURTHER DISCUSSION, EXPANDED DISCUSSION.
[05:19:11] MIKE WAS THERE TOO FOUR OR FIVE DAYS MOST STRATEGIC PLANNING. WE
[05:19:16] HAVE DONE DOCUMENT I SENT TO CITY MANAGER AND THE MAYOR DOESN'T
[05:19:20] GIVE DISCRETION. IT SAYS EXPENDITURE THRESHOLD, NO DISCRETION.
[05:19:24] FOLLOW PROTOCOL OR WE DON'T. IF WE WANT TO CHANGE IT, WE CAN.
[05:19:28] THE PROTOCOL ADOPTED MAJORITY VOTED FOR IT. WE HAVE TO STICK
[05:19:32] WITH PROTOCOL THAT IS PROTOCOL. THAT IS WHAT IT SAYS, STICK WITH
[05:19:38] IT. APPROVED IT -- IT SPECIFICALLY SAYS EXPENDITURE THRESHOLD
[05:19:46] NOT DISCRETIONARY THRESHOLD. IF 100,000 NOT PUT IT ON CONSENT IF
[05:19:54] ON CONSENT PULL IT AND DO THIS ON A REGULAR BASIS OR COUNCIL CAN
[05:19:58] MAKE DECISION EVALUATE THIS NOT TONIGHT BUT TIME IN FUTURE CHANGE
[05:20:04] PROTOCOL AND HAVE FLEXIBILITY IF WE WANTED. THANK YOU, MAYOR.
[05:20:10] >> WOULD YOU BE OPEN -- WORKING WITH CITY MANAGER TO LOOK
[05:20:14] AT WHAT THE PROTOCOL IS AND MAYBE JUST TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT IT
[05:20:20] AND SEE IF WE CAN CLARIFY SOME OF THE POINTS OR REVISIT SOME OF
[05:20:24] THE POINTS AND BRING IT BACK AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING.
[05:20:27] >> ABSOLUTELY. AS LONG AS WHAT WE ARE DOING IS CONSISTENT
[05:20:30] WITH THE PROTOCOL, I'M FINE WITH IT. WHATEVER YOU FEEL WOULD BE
[05:20:34] A GOOD EFFICIENT WAY TO ADJUST THE PROTOCOL, THAT IS TOTALLY FINE
Page 87 of 94
[05:20:39] WITH ME. NOT A PROBLEM.
[05:20:40] >> SORRY TO CLARIFY. DO YOU WANT US TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT
[05:20:43] AND MODIFY IT AND BRING IT BACK FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL?
[05:20:46] >> NO. THAT IS TOTALLY FINE.
[05:20:48] >> NO. YES. OR NO. SORRY.
[05:20:50] >> YES.
[05:20:51] >> OKAY.
[05:20:52] >> COUNCIL HAS TO VOTE MAJORITY OF COUNCIL VOTED IN
[05:20:55] PROTOCOL. MAJORITY HAS TO ADJUST IT. SUB-COMMITTEE
[05:21:00] RECOMMENDATION ADOPTION BY COUNCIL, I'M TOTALLY FINE WITH THAT.
[05:21:03] >> MADAM CITY MANAGER, ARE YOU OKAY WITH THAT WORK WITH
[05:21:07] MAYOR PRO TEM AND MYSELF TO TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT IT AND BRING IT
[05:21:12] BACK?
[05:21:13] >> ABSOLUTELY. I THINK THAT IS COMPLETELY APPROPRIATE.
[05:21:14] YOU ARE A NEW BODY, SO DEFINITELY NEW BODY FROM ONE THAT CAME UP
[05:21:19] WITH THIS. I DO, COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY. IF I MAY, MADAME MAYOR,
[05:21:24] ON THE LIST OF FIVE, I LOOKED AT ITEM 3, ITEMS WITH PRIOR COUNCIL
[05:21:32] DECISION OR DIRECTION OR SUPPORT THAT DIRECTION TO MAKE THE
[05:21:37] DETERMINATION THAT THIS WAS A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED COUNCIL
[05:21:42] DIRECTED ACTION. I DID NOT JUST LOOK AT ITEM 5 AS THE SOLE
[05:21:46] REASON TO -- TO NOT PUT IT ON CONSENT BUT I LOOKED AT THE FACT
[05:21:51] THAT THIS COUNCIL MADE A DECISION PREVIOUSLY TWICE ON THAT POINT.
[05:21:55] IT IS DIFFERENT. I -- FOR ME, SO --
[05:22:00] >> OKAY.
[05:22:01] >> POINT MADE. UNDERSTOOD. THANK YOU.
[05:22:04] >> ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A MOTION?
[05:22:06] >> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE CONTRACT. I JUST
[05:22:12] LOST MY PAGE HERE. UM, I WILL TAKE A MOTION TO RECEIVE ON FILE,
[05:22:17] I GUESS, THE REPORT. IS THAT WHAT I NEED TO DO, MADAME CLERK?
[05:22:22] >> I WILL SECOND, MADAME MAYOR.
[05:22:25] >> TO AWARD THE CONTRACT.
[05:22:27] >> TO AWARD THE CONTRACT AND RECOMMEND ACTION ON STAFF
[05:22:33] REPORT.
[05:22:34] >> I WILL SECOND IT.
[05:22:35] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[05:22:36] >> AYE.
[05:22:37] >> IF I MAY, KEN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE.
[05:22:42] >> [INDISCERNIBLE].
[05:22:43] >> NOT ONLY THAT BUT TONIGHT WAITING THROUGH THE ENTIRE
[05:22:45] MEETING FOR US.
[05:22:46] >> AND GIVING US THANKS ON TOP OF THAT.
[05:22:49] >> RIGHT. I'M NOT SURE IF WE DESERVE IT, BUT THANK YOU.
[05:22:51] >> YOUR CIVICS LESSON FOR THE YEAR THERE, YOU ARE. THANK
[05:22:56] YOU FOR BEARING WITH US. ALL RIGHT. MADAME CLERK.
[05:23:01] >> ITEM 2P, ALSO PULLED BY COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY IS THE
[05:23:10] NORTH SCHOOL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT SUB-COMMITTEE AND MEMORANDUM
[05:23:13] OF UNDERSTANDING FULFILLMENT OVERSIGHT ROLE.
Page 88 of 94
[05:23:18] >> THANK YOU, MADAME CLERK. THIS IS DIFFERENT FROM THE
[05:23:21] LAST TWO. I'M PULLING THIS ITEM. I WON'T SUPPORT IT AS MY
[05:23:25] COLLEAGUES KNOW I DID NOT SUPPORT A PROCESS THAT CITY COUNCIL AND
[05:23:31] SCHOOL DISTRICT AND SCHOOL BOARD HAVE BEEN GOING THROUGH SINCE
[05:23:35] LATE JANUARY OR EARLY FEBRUARY. MY PREFERENCE WOULD HAVE BEEN
[05:23:39] FOR US TO WORK THROUGH THE ISSUES EARLIER ON RATHER THAN ENTERING
[05:23:43] A MILL OF UNDERSTANDING. I'M NOT SUPPORTING THIS MOTION AND
[05:23:46] UNLIKELY TO SUPPORT OTHER SUBSEQUENT MOTIONS THAT FOLLOW THE SAME
[05:23:50] PRIOR DIRECTION FROM COUNCIL. I WILL GUESS SOMEBODY ELSE WILL
[05:23:53] HAVE TO MAKE THE MOTION TO ACCEPT THIS. I WOULD BE A NO.
[05:23:57] >> ALL RIGHT. MAYOR PRO TEM?
[05:23:59] >> THANK YOU. MADAME MAYOR, I MOVE THAT THE COUNCIL --
[05:24:05] THAT THE NORTH SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SUB-COMMITTEE MEMBERS
[05:24:08] RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE SUB-COMMITTEE TO
[05:24:12] CONTINUE TO SERVE AS THE COUNCIL'S REPRESENTATIVES ON JOINT CITY
[05:24:16] AND HERMOSA SCHOOL BEACH CITY COLLABORATIVE CHARGED WITH
[05:24:20] OVERSEEING FULFILLMENT OF NORTH SCHOOL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
[05:24:24] MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING EXECUTED FEBRUARY 27TH, 2019.
[05:24:28] >> A SECOND.
[05:24:30] >> MADAM MAYOR, IF I MIGHT?
[05:24:32] >> COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY.
[05:24:34] >> MAYOR PRO TEM, CAN I CLARIFY ARE YOU MOVING THE COUNCIL
[05:24:38] AUTHORIZE THE SUB-COMMITTEE TO CONTINUE TO SERVE YOU ARE NOT
[05:24:41] MOVING THAT THE SUB-COMMITTEE RECOMMEND THAT THE COUNCIL
[05:24:44] AUTHORIZE A SUB-COMMITTEE TO CONTINUE TO SERVE?
[05:24:47] >> YEAH. THAT IS WHY I WAS TRIPPING ON THAT SENTENCE.
[05:24:50] >> ALL RIGHT. I WANTED TO CLARIFY.
[05:24:52] >> THANK YOU.
[05:24:53] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR.
[05:24:56] >> I WILL SECOND, MADAME MAYOR.
[05:24:58] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[05:25:00] >> AYE.
[05:25:01] >> OPPOSED?
[05:25:02] >> NO.
[05:25:03] >> ALL RIGHT. MADAME CLERK.
[05:25:12] >> THANK YOU. NEXT IS MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING
[05:25:16] ATTENDANCE REPORTS CITY COUNCIL. WE HAVE COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY
[05:25:21] PROVIDING US ON UPDATE ON MEETING WITH SENATOR SCOTT WIENER'S
[05:25:27] LEGISLATIVE A TO DISCUSS SENATE BILL 50.
[05:25:31] >> COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY?
[05:25:34] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. I WAS IN SACRAMENTO LAST WEEK.
[05:25:42] I TOOK THE TIME TO SIT DOWN WITH THE SENATOR WIENER LEGISLATIVE 8
[05:25:50] TO GO OVER SENATE BILL 50 AND WANTED TO SHARE WITH MY COLLEAGUES
[05:25:54] THAT DISCUSSION. IT WASN'T CLEAR TO ME UNTIL I SAT DOWN WITH HER
[05:25:58] AND HAD HER GO THROUGH THE PROCESS WITH ME A LITTLE BIT. BEFORE
[05:26:01] I GO THERE, I WILL MENTION A COUPLE QUICK BACKGROUND. MAYOR PRO
[05:26:06] TEM AND I SERVE AS DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE OF THE CITY BEFORE THE
Page 89 of 94
[05:26:11] SOUTH BAY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AND THEY HAVE ISSUED LETTER OF
[05:26:17] OPPOSITION ATTACHED HERE DATED FEBRUARY 20TH, 2019, IT WAS SENT
[05:26:22] TO SENATOR WIENER APPOSING SENATE BILL 50. I ALSO SERVE AS
[05:26:27] CITY'S REPRESENT ITIVE TO CONTRACT CITY'S ASSOCIATION LEGISLATIVE
[05:26:32] COMMITTEE THAT MEETS ONCE A MONTH TO GO OVER WHATEVER VARIOUS
[05:26:36] PENDING LEGISLATION. THIS LEGISLATION IS ALSO ON OUR LIST AND
[05:26:41] THE CONTRACT CITY'S LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE HAS DECIDED TO PUT A
[05:26:49] HOLD ON THE BILL TO ALLOW US TO CONTINUE DIALOGUE WITH SENATOR
[05:26:52] WIENER AND STAFF. INSTEAD OF OPPOSING IT WE DECIDED TO OBSERVE
[05:26:56] IT IF YOU WILL AND CONTINUE DIALOGUE. OPPOSITION TWO BODIES
[05:27:01] REPRESENT LOTS OF THE CITIES ON THIS BILL. WHEN I SAT DOWN WITH
[05:27:05] LEGISLATIVE AID, THE CLARIFICATION TO ME WAS THAT THIS BILL
[05:27:09] CONTRARY TO THE LAST YEAR'S 827 BILL MAKES IT A LOT MORE CLEARER
[05:27:16] DISTINCTION BETWEEN CITIES THAT HAVE BUS ROUTES AND CITIES THAT
[05:27:21] HAVE RAIL ROUTES IN A WAY IT WAS EXPLAINED TO ME BY THE
[05:27:25] LEGISLATIVE AIDE WAS FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, IF THIS BILL
[05:27:31] PASSES, IT WOULDN'T CHANGE HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS OF BUILDINGS IN
[05:27:34] THE CITY. IT WOULD CHANGE DENSITY AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS, SO
[05:27:38] IN AN AREA WHERE 30-FOOT HEIGHT LIMIT WITH R2 LOT. FOR EXAMPLE,
[05:27:44] THAT WOULD BASICALLY STAY AT 30-FOOT HEIGHT LIMIT, BUT R2 WOULD
[05:27:49] GO AWAY AND DEVELOPER WOULD BUILD WHATEVER, HOWEVER MANY UNITS IT
[05:27:53] CAN FIT AND IF R2 LOT HAD A FOUR PARKING SPOT REQUIREMENT, THAT
[05:27:59] WOULD GO AWAY. BUILDING COULD BE ERECTED WITH NO PARKING SPOTS
[05:28:05] AND WHOEVER LIVED THERE HAS TO RECTIFY OWN PARKING RESTRICTION
[05:28:10] AND PUT INTO THE BILL TO MAKE SURE TENANTS ARE PROPERLY SITUATED
[05:28:14] AND EXISTING BUILDINGS ARE NOT DISPLACED SO CITY COULD HAVE ITS
[05:28:18] OWN, I GUESS, DEMOLITION RESTRICTION, IF YOU WILL, TO ADOPT OWN
[05:28:23] REGULATIONS TO BASICALLY PREVENT BUILDINGS THAT HAVE, I THINK,
[05:28:27] TENANTS THAT HAVE TO BE THERE FOR AT LEAST A YEAR OR LONGER. I
[05:28:31] CAN'T REMEMBER THE TIMEFRAME WE WOULD MAKE ADOPT ORDINANCE, SAY,
[05:28:35] IF BUILDING AND TENANTS IN IT, LANDLORD OR OWNER WOULDN'T BE ABLE
[05:28:40] TO DEMOLISH IT TO BUILD ANOTHER BUILDING TO BE COMPLIANT WITH
[05:28:45] EXISTING SB50. WE ARE DISPLACING TENANTS. THERE IS CONTROL OF
[05:28:50] CITY TO DO THAT LONG WAY SAYING THIS DIFFERENT 827 DIFFERENT
[05:28:54] MINDSET BUT WOULD OBVIOUSLY ALSO LOSE LOCAL CONTROL. I WANT TO
[05:28:59] BRING UP FOR DISCUSSION CITIES SENDING LETTERS OPPOSITION ALREADY
[05:29:06] -- MY RECOMMENDATION AT THIS STAGE WOULD BE TO ASK STAFF TO
[05:29:10] EVALUATE THIS BILL AND COME UP WITH THEIR OWN RECOMMENDATIONS AND
[05:29:15] THOUGHTS ABOUT NEXT STEPS AND ENGAGE WITH THE SENATORS AND STAFF
[05:29:20] IF THEY FEEL IT IS NEEDED TO COME BACK TO US. I THINK THIS BILL
[05:29:24] IS PROCEEDING QUICKLY. THE FACT SHEET I INCLUDED, IF YOU TAKE A
[05:29:29] LOOK AT THE LAST PAGE OF THE FACT SHEET, I WAS SURPRISED ABOUT
[05:29:33] HOW MANY SUPPORTERS OF THE BILL, INCLUDING LODGE OF LEGISLATIVE
[05:29:41] AND ELECTED OFFICIALS AND ORGANIZATIONS. THE BILL BASICALLY HAS
[05:29:45] A LOT OF TRACTION TO IT. I JUST DON'T WANT TO WAIT SIMILAR TO
[05:29:50] WHAT WE HAD TO DO WITH THE BILL REGARDING SIDEWALK VENDING A FEW
[05:29:55] WEEKS AGO HAVE A BILL GO THROUGH AND WE HAVE TO BE AFTER THE
Page 90 of 94
[05:29:59] FACT. THIS BILL WILL EFFECT ALL CITIES IN CALIFORNIA TO
[05:30:03] OBVIOUSLY SOME TO DIFFERENT DEGREES. IT WOULD PROBABLY BE BETTER
[05:30:08] FOR US TO ASK OUR STAFF TO EVALUATE IT AND LOOK AT IT AND KEEP US
[05:30:12] ENGAGED AND HAVE THAT COME BACK WITH A MORE THOROUGH AGENDA ITEM
[05:30:17] TO EVALUATE TO SUPPORT OPPOSE OR ENGAGE WITH SENATOR STAFF AND
[05:30:22] LITTLE MORE ACTIVE STATUS THAN WHAT WE HAVE DONE SO FAR. SO FAR
[05:30:26] FROM OUR STANDPOINT SACRAMENTO IN GENERAL -- DELEGATION ABOUT 50
[05:30:32] OFFICERS OR SO SPOKE AND SENATOR WIENER CAME TO US AND GAVE
[05:30:37] PRESENTATION ABOUT THE BOOR AND SAID HE WILL HAVE OPEN DOOR
[05:30:40] POLICY AND HAVE PEOPLE TALK TO HIM. WHEN I WAS BACK AGAIN LAST
[05:30:43] WEEK, I HAD A CHANCE TO TALK TO THEM AGAIN SINCE LISTENING TO
[05:30:48] HIM. WE HAVEN'T ENGAGED WITH HIM, HAVEN'T SENT LETTER TO HIM. I
[05:30:56] THINK IT IS PROBABLY SOMETHING WE SHOULD CONSIDER DOING AT THIS
[05:31:00] STAGE BEFORE IT GETS TOO LATE AND PASSED THE TIME HE WOULD ACCEPT
[05:31:06] AMENDMENTS OR CONSIDERATION FROM US.
[05:31:08] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT UPDATE.
[05:31:11] >> I WANT TO CLARIFY. SO YOU ARE -- YOU ARE JUST LOOKING
[05:31:14] TO GIVE STAFF DIRECTION TO LOOK INTO THIS FURTHER; RIGHT? IS
[05:31:18] THAT WHAT YOUR ACTION HERE IS CALLING FOR.
[05:31:21] >> YES. I THINK ONE OF THE THOUGHTS IS BASICALLY TO GIVE
[05:31:24] AN UPDATE TONIGHT WITH A RECOMMENDED YOU KNOW LETTER OF
[05:31:28] OPPOSITION. I THINK THAT IS MAYBE TOO PREMATURE. IF I THINK
[05:31:32] THAT WE HAVEN'T GIVEN STAFF THE OPPORTUNITY TO EVALUATE THE ISSUE
[05:31:36] AND TALK TO THE SENATOR.
[05:31:38] >> IT IS NOT A MOTION; RIGHT? JUST DIRECTION TO STAFF TO
[05:31:41] LOOK INTO THE BILLING AND COME BACK AND REPORT ON THE STATUS
[05:31:45] WHERE IT IS.
[05:31:46] >> YES. IT HAS WHERE I AM AS LONG AS OTHER MEMBERS OF THE
[05:31:49] COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO GIVE THAT DIRECTION, YES. THAT IS MY
[05:31:52] VIEWPOINT. CITY MANAGER WOULD WANT TO HEAR FROM MORE THAN
[05:31:56] ONE PERSON TO GET THE DIRECTION IF YOU ARE AMENABLE.
[05:31:58] >> I SUPPORT IT.
[05:32:00] >> WE SHOULD MAKE IT IN FORM OF MOTION.
[05:32:03] >> I DON'T THINK SO. THEY ARE LOOKING TO --
[05:32:05] >> COME BACK WITH A POTENTIAL LETTER.
[05:32:07] >> THIS IS AGENDA ITEM, WE WOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE A MOTION,
[05:32:11] BUT IT IS UP TO YOU.
[05:32:12] >> ALL RIGHT.
[05:32:13] >> I WOULD, MADAME MAYOR, BACK COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY'S
[05:32:17] INCLINATION TO HAVE US AS A CITY GET AHEAD OF THIS BECAUSE THE
[05:32:22] ONE BOARD MEETING OR EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING I SAT IN ON YOUR
[05:32:27] BEHALF, THERE WAS A LENGTHY DISCUSSION ABOUT SB50.
[05:32:31] IT IS -- IT IS THE PROBLEM WITH IT IS THE ATTEMPTS TO TAKE
[05:32:35] AWAY LOCAL CONTROL AND TREAT ALL MUNICIPALITIES SORT OF SIMILARLY
[05:32:40] ACROSS HOUSING SHORTAGE ISSUES WHEN THERE IS VAST DIFFERENCES
[05:32:46] ACROSS TYPES OF CHALLENGES THEY WOULD FACE IF THAT WERE TO COME
[05:32:52] TO PASS. THEY BROUGHT UP ALL SORTS OF INTERESTING FACTS,
Page 91 of 94
[05:32:55] ENGINEERS IN THE ROOM, ABOUT THE FUTURE TRENDS OF PEOPLE LIVING
[05:32:58] IN CALIFORNIA AND MIGRATING CLOSER TO THE COAST AND IN THE EVENT
[05:33:02] OF EVENTUAL CLIMATE CHANGES AND ALL KINDS OF INTERESTING THINGS.
[05:33:08] I WOULD JUST TO YOUR POINT, I THINK WE SHOULD GET OUR HEADS IN IT
[05:33:12] AND SEE IF THERE ARE POSITIONS AS A CITY THAT WE WOULD WANT TO
[05:33:19] TAKE A STAND FOR. IT IS A LITTLE BIT OF WILD WEST IN TERMS OF
[05:33:23] THEY WON'T STOP BRINGING THIS FORWARD. THE HOUSING SHORTAGE
[05:33:27] ISSUE IS SO SEVERE I THINK -- I DON'T REMEMBER. I HEARD, BUT
[05:33:30] SENATOR WIENER WON'T STOP. HE WILL KEEP BRINGING IT. HE IS VERY
[05:33:36] PASSIONATE ABOUT IT UNTIL WE GET SOMETHING PASSED IN THE STATE.
[05:33:39] >> I THINK, IF I MAY, MADAME MAYOR, SENATOR WIENER IS CHAIR
[05:33:44] OF COMMITTEE THAT OVERSEES THE BILL. THE ASSURANCE BILL WILL
[05:33:49] LEAVE THE COMMITTEE. HE IS CHAIRMAN. HE WILL MAKE SURE IT
[05:33:53] LEAVES COMMITTEE AND COMES TO FLOOR FOR INPUT. THE FLOOR FOR
[05:33:58] VOTE NOW IS PROBABLY RIGHT TIME TO DO IT.
[05:34:00] >> ALL RIGHT. I THINK THEN STAFF HEARD US THAT THEY WANT
[05:34:04] -- WE WANT YOU TO EVALUATE SB50. AND WE CAN HAVE A MOTION NOW?
[05:34:10] >> YES. MADAME MAYOR, I MOVE THAT WE EXTEND THE MEETING
[05:34:15] UNTIL 11:15
[05:34:16] >> DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
[05:34:18] >> SECOND.
[05:34:19] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[05:34:20] >> AYE.
[05:34:22] >> A SPECIAL TREAT FOR YOU GUYS AT THE END WHEN WE HAVE TO
[05:34:27] GO BACK INTO CLOSED SESSION, BUT IN ANY EVENT --
[05:34:31] >> MADAME MAYOR, MOTION ON GRANICUS WAS DIFFERENT ON THE
[05:34:39] MOTION. MOTION WAS TO EXTEND THE MEETING.
[05:34:40] >> CORRECT.
[05:34:41] >> NOT TO --
[05:34:42] >> OH, I DON'T -- I CAN'T SEE.
[05:34:45] >> NOT WITH STAFF REGARDING SB50.
[05:34:48] >> MIKE SAID HE HAD THE MOTION JUST DIRECTION.
[05:34:53] >> ALL RIGHT. MADAME CLERK, LOOK INTO THAT. THANK YOU FOR
[05:34:57] NOTICING. MADAME CLERK.
[05:34:59] >> BEFORE YOU TAKE IT TO MADAME CLERK.
[05:35:01] >> OH, YES.
[05:35:02] >> MADAME MAYOR, IF IT WERE A MOTION REGARDING SB50, I
[05:35:07] WOULDN'T SUPPORT IT WITH DUE RESPECT TO MY COLLEAGUES. I BELIEVE
[05:35:10] THIS IS AN APPROPRIATE THING FOR US TO UTILIZE LEAGUE OF CITIES
[05:35:14] FOR. THAT IS WHAT THEY DO, AND WE PAY A MEMBERSHIP FEE, AND WE
[05:35:18] ARE INVOLVED, SO THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR.
[05:35:21] >> OKAY. HOPEFULLY STAFF CAN WORK WITH THEM TO GIVE
[05:35:26] UPDATES TO LESSENS BURDEN AND LOAD. MADAME CLERK?
[05:35:32] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. 7B IS UPDATES FROM CITY
[05:35:37] COUNCIL, AD HOC SUB-COMMITTEES, OUTSTANDING DELEGATES, AND
[05:35:43] ALTERNATES.
[05:35:44] >> ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE ANY SUB-COMMITTEE UPDATES? WE
Page 92 of 94
[05:35:49] MET AS A DOWNTOWN SUB-COMMITTEE. COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY, YOU
[05:35:57] RAISED TO PUSH THAT BUTTON.
[05:35:58] >> WE CONTINUE TO WORK TO LIGHTING APPROVAL OF THE HARDWARE
[05:36:04] AS WELL AS LOOKING AT CONCEPTS FOR SOME SEATING ALONG PIER
[05:36:10] AVENUE. THAT, I BELIEVE, IS THE BULK OF OUR LAST MEETING.
[05:36:13] >> AND --
[05:36:15] >> AND TARASH'S ISSUES AROUND LOT A. WE HAVE CHANGES
[05:36:22] COMING TO HOW WE MANAGE TRASH IN LOT A. WHAT WE ARE DOING IS NOT
[05:36:27] WORKING.
[05:36:30] >> YUP.
[05:36:31] >> AND COMING UP AT OUR NEXT MEETING IS PURCHASE AND
[05:36:34] INSTALLATION OF PIER AVENUE BUS STOP SHELTERS AND FURNITURE,
[05:36:40] WHICH IS PART OF WHAT WE WERE DISCUSSING AT THE LAST MEETING. IT
[05:36:45] WILL BE COMING IN FRONT OF US AND ALSO COMING TO OUR NEXT MEETING
[05:36:48] IS APPROVAL OF SUMMER CONCERT AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR 2019. STAFF
[05:36:54] IS WORKING DILIGENTLY ON THAT. WE WILL HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR
[05:36:58] US, AND IT LOOKS GREAT FOR OUR -- OUR NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. ANY
[05:37:04] OTHER SUB-COMMITTEE UPDATES? OUR NORTH SCHOOL SUB-COMMITTEE WILL
[05:37:09] BE MEETING ON MONDAY; RIGHT? SO WE WILL BEGIN THOSE DISCUSSIONS.
[05:37:16] >> NEXT WEEK ANYWAY.
[05:37:17] >> NEXT WEEK IMPLEMENTING THE MLU. ALL RIGHT.
[05:37:24] MADAME CLERK.
[05:37:27] >> NEXT IS OTHER MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL.
[05:37:31] >> MADAME MAYOR, I DO HAVE -- I DO HAVE ANOTHER -- I DO
[05:37:37] HAVE OTHER MATTERS I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS. CONSISTENT WITH THE
[05:37:43] PRESENTATION THAT WAS MADE EARLIER ABOUT 4/20, APRIL 20TH. WHAT
[05:37:51] I WOULD LIKE IS JUST FOR YOU TO CONSULT WITH THE POLICE CHIEF AND
[05:37:58] MAYBE REPORT BACK IN TERMS OF WHAT WE CAN DO IN TERMS OF ENHANCED
[05:38:02] ENFORCEMENT ON THAT DATE, YOU KNOW, CONCURRENT WITH OUR
[05:38:07] NEIGHBORING CITIES. HERE, I WILL GIVE YOU -- HERE IS LOTS OF
[05:38:12] GOOD MATERIAL FOR YOU TO READ. I'M HAPPY TO PASS THAT ALONG.
[05:38:17] >> THAT DATE BEING APRIL 20TH?
[05:38:20] >> YES.
[05:38:21] >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. MADAME CLERK?
[05:38:28] >> WAS THERE SUPPORT OR WAS THAT --
[05:38:34] >> WE HAD SOME HEAD NODS, YES.
[05:38:39] >> UM.
[05:38:40] >> OH, SORRY.
[05:38:41] >> SO NORMALLY, YEAH. WITH OTHER MATTERS, WE LIST WHO
[05:38:45] SUPPORTED THE ITEM.
[05:38:46] >> YOU HAVE MY HEAD NOD.
[05:38:48] >> SO STATE.
[05:38:49] >> I THINK WE HAVE AT LEAST COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY AND
[05:38:52] COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS AND MYSELF.
[05:38:55] >> ALL RIGHT.
[05:38:56] >> AND FANGARY.
[05:38:58] >> AND MAYOR PRO TEM. YEAH. YOU HAD UNANIMOUS HEAD NODS.
Page 93 of 94
[05:39:03] >> OKAY.
[05:39:04] >> ON TO TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA.
[05:39:11] >> YES.
[05:39:12] >> MADAME MAYOR, I DO HAVE ACTUALLY TWO ON THE PENDING DUE
[05:39:17] ITEMS ON THE HOLDING LIST, AS YOU WILL.
[05:39:21] >> UH-HUH.
[05:39:23] >> I WOULD LOVE TO SEE MOVE UP, AND, I THINK, APPROPRIATELY
[05:39:26] SO. THAT WOULD BE THE AMENDMENT TO THE TOBACCO RETAILERS LICENSE
[05:39:32] TO INCLUDE FLAVORED TOBACCO BAN ACROSS ALL RETAILERS AS I RECALL
[05:39:38] COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY FELT WE HAVE TO DO THAT AS A SEPARATE ITEM.
[05:39:42] I DON'T DISAGREE WITH THAT. I THINK THE TIME IS RIGHT, CERTAINLY
[05:39:47] GIVEN THE INFUSION OF INFORMATION THAT I NOW HAVE. I THINK THERE
[05:39:51] IS A SENSE OF URGENCY FOR THIS. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE US DO THAT.
[05:39:56] THE OTHER ONE IS THE PLASTICS ORDINANCE THAT IS SITTING THERE
[05:40:02] TOO. I ALSO BELIEVE IT COULD BE MOVED ON TO THE ACTIVE AGENDA AT
[05:40:07] SOME POINT SOONER RATHER THAN LATER. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT.
[05:40:13] >> ALL RIGHT.
[05:40:14] >> THAT IS ALL. THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR.
[05:40:18] >> TWO COMMENTS FOR DISCUSSION.
[05:40:20] >> YES.
[05:40:21] >> JEFF AND KEN WOULD BE ABLE TO TALK MORE ABOUT THIS THAN
[05:40:25] I WOULD. MY RECOLLECTION WAS THAT ANY ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT THE
[05:40:31] SALE OF FLAVORED TOBACCO PRODUCTS IN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WOULD
[05:40:37] BENEFIT FROM OUTREACH TO EFFECTED BUSINESSES PRIOR TO BRINGING
[05:40:41] THAT FORWARD.
[05:40:42] DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE THE BANDWIDTH TO DO THAT IN THE
[05:40:47] NEAR FUTURE?
[05:40:48] >> THAT IS OUR PLAN.
[05:40:50] >> TWO OUTLETS.
[05:40:51] >> TWO BUSINESSES TO OUTREACH TO. THEY WOULD BE AWARE OF
[05:40:56] CONSIDERING.
[05:40:57] >> TWO ON PCH, ONE DOWN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TOWN,
[05:41:02] BUT --
[05:41:03] >> I'M AWARE OF ONLY TWO FROM PRIOR RESEARCH WE DID. WE
[05:41:06] WILL DEFINITELY CHECK CLOSE TO.
[05:41:08] >> CLOSE TO EACH OTHER ON PCH; RIGHT? IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN.
[05:41:14] >> RIGHT.
[05:41:15] >> AND WITH RESPECT TO PLASTICS ORDINANCE THAT IS URGENT AS
[05:41:18] FAR AS I'M CONCERNED. I DO THINK IT REQUIRES A LOT OF SORT OF
[05:41:22] INVOLVEMENT, YOU AND I, PERHAPS IN TERMS OF CRAFTING THE AGENDA.
[05:41:26] AS YOU KNOW, I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO WORK ON POTENTIALLY A PANEL
[05:41:30] FOR OUR EARTH DAY FESTIVAL ON THE FUTURE OF SINGLE USE PLASTICS
[05:41:35] AND WOULD INCLUDE SOMEBODY FROM SURF RIDERS AND SOMEBODY FROM
[05:41:41] GRADES OF GREEN AND SENATOR ALLAN BILL IN LEGISLATURE NOW AND
[05:41:47] MAYOR PALATONO -- HE IS A BIG ADVOCATE FOR DOING STUFF ABOUT
[05:41:56] SINGLE USE PLASTICS. SO I AM HOPEFUL THAT, THAT, WE CAN PULL IT
[05:42:03] TOGETHER. IF SO, WE MIGHT HAVE IDEAS COMING OUT OF THAT FOR --
Page 94 of 94
[05:42:07] >> I DON'T THINK WE HAVE TO FORM A TASK FORCE OR A WORKING
[05:42:11] GROUP I THINK YOU AND I CAN WORK TOGETHER. I'M HAPPY TO DO
[05:42:14] WHATEVER I CAN TO ASSIST YOU ON THIS.
[05:42:16] >> RIGHT. I THINK WE MIGHT WANT AGENDA ITEM TO TRAIL ON
[05:42:22] THAT, WHATEVER WE GET IN THAT DISCUSSION AND GIVE INPUT TO STAFF
[05:42:25] TO COME FORWARD WITH OPTIONS.
[05:42:27] >> SOUNDS GOOD.
[05:42:28] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR AND THANKS JEFF.
[05:42:32] >> ALL RIGHT. OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? NO. ALL RIGHT.
[05:42:36] I THINK THAT WE HAVE REACHED THE END OF OUR MEETING.
[05:42:42] AND WE ARE ADJOURNING BACK TO OUR CLOSED SESSION, WHICH WILL
[05:42:49] BE IN THE SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM TO CONTINUE DISCUSSION ON
[05:42:54] INITIATION OF LITIGATION.
[05:42:57] THE NEXT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING IS TUESDAY, APRIL 9TH
[05:43:02] WITH CLOSED SESSION AT 6:00 P.M. FOLLOWED BY THE REGULAR MEETING
[05:43:07] AT 7:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. TONIGHT, WE ADJOURN TONIGHT'S
[05:43:14] MEETING IN MEMORY OF RESIDENT CHRIS FIX, WHO UNEXPECTEDLY AND
[05:43:20] TRAGICALLY PASSED AWAY FRIDAY, MARCH 22ND. WHETHER ON THE HOCKEY
[05:43:25] ICE, LACROSSE FIELD, OR BEACH, CHRIS FIX WAS AN AMAZING FIXTURE
[05:43:30] NOT ONLY IN HIS FAMILY'S LIFE BUT IN SO MANY PEOPLE'S LIVES IN
[05:43:34] THE SOUTH BAY AND IN THIS COMMUNITY AND BEYOND. CHRIS WILL BE
[05:43:38] GREATLY MISSED. HE IS SURVIVED BY HIS WIFE GENERALLY AND THEIR
[05:43:42] YOUNG SONS NATHAN, TABIN, AND GAVIN. A MEMORIAL SERVICE WILL BE
[05:43:48] HELD FRIDAY, APRIL 5TH, AT 10 A.M. AT AMERICAN MARTYRS CHURCH,
[05:43:55] 624. A MANHATTAN BEACH SCHOLARSHIP FUND IS BEING SET UP FOR
[05:44:03] CHILDREN, AND DETAILS WILL BE AVAILABLE SOON. YOU MAY CONTACT
[05:44:07] CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE FOR MORE INFORMATION.
Page 1 of 94
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
MEETING CAPTIONS
MARCH 26, 2019 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
**************************************************************************************************************************
Disclaimer: Caption text employs contractions, paraphrasing and other techniques to keep pace with the
meeting. Captions may also suffer from typographical errors. Hence, captions should not be considered
complete or official transcriptions of the meeting.
**************************************************************************************************************************
[01:39:00] >> ALRIGHT EVERYBODY, I CALL TO ORDER
[01:39:03] THE MARCH 26, REGULAR
[01:39:05] MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL. WILL MAX
[01:39:11] RILEY PLEASE LEAD US IN
[01:39:13] THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE?
[01:39:19] >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF
[01:39:20] THE UNITED STATES OF
[01:39:21] AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT
[01:39:22] STANDS, ONE NATION,
[01:39:37] UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND
[01:39:38] JUSTICE FOR ALL.
[01:39:39] >> ALRIGHT. MADAM CLERK, ROLL CALL.
[01:39:43] >> THANK YOU. DUCLOS, HERE. MASSEY,
[01:39:44] HERE. FANGARY, HERE.
[01:39:54] CAMPBELL, HERE. ARMATO, HERE.
[01:39:57] >> MR. CITY ATTORNEY WILL YOU DELIVER
[01:39:58] THE CLOSED SESSION
[01:40:01] REPORT.
[01:40:02] >> THANK YOU MAYOR THERE WERE NO
[01:40:03] COMMENTS ON THE CLOSED
[01:40:04] SESSION AGENDA WHEN THE COUNCIL CALLED
[01:40:05] THE MEETING TO ORDER AT
[01:40:08] 5:30 AND NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS TAKEN.
[01:40:14] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO MY COLLEAGUES
[01:40:15] HAVE ANNOUNCEMENTS?
[01:40:18] COUNCIL MEMBER FANGARY.
[01:40:19] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. I WANT TO
[01:40:20] QUICKLY ACKNOWLEDGE AND
[01:40:24] THANK THE [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] HEALTH
[01:40:25] DISTRICT AND FORMER CITY
[01:40:28] MANAGER TOM BACKLY BEING HERE SATURDAY
[01:40:29] AT THE COMMUNITY FIRST
[01:40:32] MEETING AND GIVING A PRESENTATION ABOUT
[01:40:33] THE SOUTH DISTRICT
[01:40:35] PLANS. IT WAS REALLY INTERESTING TO ME
[01:40:36] TO SEE WHAT THEY HAVE
Page 2 of 94
[01:40:39] IN MIND. THEY HAD A OPEN HOUSE IN THE
[01:40:40] FACILITY AT 10 O'CLOCK
[01:40:45] AND TOM SAID THEY HAD A REALLY GOOD
[01:40:46] ATTENDANCE, ALL MOST 200
[01:40:48] PEOPLE THERE, SO IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN
[01:40:49] FULLY INFORMED ON THE BC
[01:40:53] SOUTH DISTRICT PLANS GOING FORWARD, THEY
[01:40:54] HAVE I BELIEVE A 15
[01:40:57] YEAR SCHEDULE FOR VARIOUS THINGS AND
[01:40:58] VARIOUS PHASES ARE GOING
[01:41:00] THROUGH, SO I THINK IT WAS A GREAT
[01:41:01] PRESENTATION AND IF YOU ARE
[01:41:05] NOT WELL INFORMED ABOUT THE PROCESS I'M
[01:41:06] SURE THEY HAVE
[01:41:08] INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE WEBSITE.
[01:41:09] THEY ARE GOING TO START
[01:41:10] THE I GUESS THE EIR PROCESS AND FULL
[01:41:11] PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN
[01:41:15] APRIL SO LOOK FORWARD FOR ANNOUNCEMENTS
[01:41:16] FROM THEM ABOUT EVENTS
[01:41:20] AND ACTIVITIES AND GET ENGAGED AND HEAR
[01:41:21] WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY
[01:41:26] BECAUSE EXCITED FOR THE PLANS IN THE
[01:41:27] NEXT 15 YEARS FOR THE
[01:41:29] SOUTH BAY. THANK YOU, MAYOR.
[01:41:30] >> THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER DUCLOS.
[01:41:33] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THIS PAST
[01:41:34] WEEK I HAD THE
[01:41:38] OPPORTUNITY TO REPRESENT THE CITY AT TWO
[01:41:39] PARTICULAR EVENTS ON
[01:41:42] THURSDAY AND THEN AGAIN ON FRIDAY. ON
[01:41:43] THURSDAY, THE AMERICAN
[01:41:46] ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS HAD A COMMUNITY
[01:41:47] TOWN HALL ADDRESSING THE
[01:41:52] ISSUE RELATED TO TEEN AGE VAPING, AND I
[01:41:53] WAS HAPPY TO
[01:41:59] PARTICIPATE IN THAT BECAUSE OF OUR
[01:42:00] RECENT ORDINANCE. THEY
[01:42:03] WERE VERY INTERESTED WHAT WE WERE DOING
[01:42:04] FROM THE CITY. THERE
[01:42:07] WERE SPEAKERS FROM AMERICAN ACADEMY OF
[01:42:08] PEDIATRICS AND THE
[01:42:13] DIRECTOR OF CHRONIC DISEASE AND INJURY
[01:42:14] PREVENTION FOR LOS
[01:42:17] ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH WAS THERE.
[01:42:18] PROGRAM COORDINATORS
[01:42:20] FOR THE LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF EDUCATION
Page 3 of 94
[01:42:21] TOBACCO USE PREVENTION
[01:42:25] PROGRAM, AND ALSO DR. ALICE COOHOO,
[01:42:26] PRESIDENT OF AMERICAN
[01:42:31] ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS TEENAGE vaping
[01:42:32] HEALTH CRISIS MANAGEMENT.
[01:42:38] ON FRIDAY, I ATTENDED ANOTHER EVENT ON
[01:42:39] BEHALF OF THE CITY FOR
[01:42:44] THE URBAN COUNTIES FLAVORED TOBACCO
[01:42:45] TRAINING PROGRAM, AND IN
[01:42:52] THAT THERE WERE A NUMBER OF PEOPLE
[01:42:53] SPEAKING BESIDE MYSELF.
[01:43:02] SENIOR DIRECTOR FOR THE AMERICAN LUNG
[01:43:03] ASSOCIATION FOR
[01:43:04] CALIFORNIA WAS A KEY SPEAKER. THERE WAS
[01:43:05] PROGRAM-NUMBER OF
[01:43:09] DIRECTORS FROM DIFFERENT REGIONAL
[01:43:10] PROGRAMS, THE PROGRAM
[01:43:11] DIRECTOR FOR THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
[01:43:12] PUBLIC HEALTH. ALAMEDA
[01:43:16] COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT, POLICY
[01:43:17] DIRECTOR, THE PROJECT
[01:43:20] DIRECTOR FOR CONTRA COSTA HEALTH
[01:43:21] SERVICES. SAN MATEO COUNTY
[01:43:27] HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH EDUCATOR WAS THERE
[01:43:28] AND JOINING ME ON THE
[01:43:31] PANEL WAS MAYOR JOHN MARISH WHO IS THE
[01:43:32] MAYOR OF THE CITY OF
[01:43:36] BEVERLY HILLS. AND, THESE DISCUSSIONS
[01:43:37] WERE IMPORTANT BUT
[01:43:44] CERTAINLY RAISED IN VALUE TO ME BY
[01:43:45] PARTICIPATING IN THEM IN
[01:43:50] THAT AS YOU MAY KNOW, THE ISSUES RELATED
[01:43:51] TO teenage vaping E
[01:43:59] CIGARETTES HAS BEEN SAID BY THE SURGEON
[01:44:00] GENERAL TO BE A
[01:44:05] PENDING EPIDEMIC, BUT I THINK IN TRUTH,
[01:44:06] IT'S EPIDEMIC THAT IS
[01:44:12] UPON US CLEARLY IN THIS COMMUNITY. IT
[01:44:13] SEEMS THE PROBLEM STEMS
[01:44:17] FROM THE FACT THAT TEEN-AGERS ARE
[01:44:18] OVERLOOKING OR UNDER
[01:44:23] ESTIMATING A KEY INGREDIENT IN THE
[01:44:24] VAPORS THEY INHALE AND IT
[01:44:28] IS HIGHLY ADDICTIVE NICOTINE. IT IS
[01:44:29] POSSIBLE TO BUY LIQUID
[01:44:33] AND POD REFILLS WITHOUT NICOTINE, THEY
[01:44:34] ARE HARD TO FIND.
Page 4 of 94
[01:44:37] WHILE A TEEN-WHEN A TEEN INHALES VAPORS
[01:44:38] LACED WITH NICOTINE
[01:44:43] THE DRUG IS QUICKLY ABSORBED THROUGH THE
[01:44:44] BLOOD VESSELS LININGS
[01:44:47] OF THE LUNGS, IT REACHES THE BRAIN IN
[01:44:48] ABOUT 10 SECONDS, AND
[01:44:51] WELL OVER TWO MILLION MIDDLE SCHOOL,
[01:44:52] HIGH SCHOOL COLLEGE TEENS
[01:44:56] ARE USING SUCH DEVICES AND IT IS CLEARLY
[01:44:57] HAPPENING IN THE
[01:45:01] COMMUNITY. THOSE NUMBERS ARE CURRENTLY
[01:45:02] UNDER STATED FROM
[01:45:05] EVERYTHING WE ARE HEARING AND THE ISSUE
[01:45:06] STEMS FROM THE FACT
[01:45:08] THAT YOUNGER-THE YOUNGER THE DEVELOPING
[01:45:09] BRAIN IS EXPOSED TO
[01:45:12] NICOTINE, THE STRONGER AND MORE RAPID
[01:45:13] THE ADDICTION AND THE
[01:45:17] EARLIER THE YOUNG PERSON BECOMES
[01:45:18] ADDICTED, THE HARDER IT IS
[01:45:22] FOR THEM TO QUIT. HEALTH OFFICIALS
[01:45:23] WORRIED FOR YEARS
[01:45:27] ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES CAN LEAD KIDS TO
[01:45:28] SMOKING TRADITIONAL
[01:45:32] CIGARETTES AND THAT CONCERN IS BEGINNING
[01:45:33] TO BE REALIZED. THE
[01:45:35] MAJORITY OF TEENAGERS WHO PICK UP E
[01:45:36] CIGARETTES NEVER SMOKED A
[01:45:41] TRADITIONAL CIGARETTE AND NOW ACCORDING
[01:45:42] TO RESEARCH ARE 4
[01:45:45] TIMES MORE LIKELY TO DO SO. THOUGH THE
[01:45:46] FEDERAL DRUG
[01:45:47] ADMINISTRATION HAS LONG HISTORY OF
[01:45:48] PREVENTATIVE PROGRAMS, THEY
[01:45:51] HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO KEEP PACE WITH THE
[01:45:52] vaping EXPLOSION.
[01:45:56] THERE ARE NO FDA APPROVED NICOTINE
[01:45:57] CESSATION PRODUCTS FOR E
[01:46:00] CIGARETTE USERS UNDER 18 YEARS OLD. NOR,
[01:46:01] THERE ARE ANY
[01:46:06] ADDICTION PROGRAMS SPECIFICALLY GEARED
[01:46:07] TOWARDS TEENS AND
[01:46:10] NICOTINE USE THOUGH THE ESCALATING
[01:46:11] POPULARITY AMONG TEENS WAS
[01:46:16] PREDICTED AS A DEVELOPMENT. JEWEL IS THE
[01:46:17] INDUSTRY LEADER, A
[01:46:21] MULTIBILLION DOLLAR COMPANY NOW OWNED 35
Page 5 of 94
[01:46:22] PERCENT BY THE MAKERS
[01:46:26] OF MARLBORO CIGARETTES AND CONTROLS MORE
[01:46:27] THEN 70 PERCENT OF
[01:46:33] THE MARKET SHARE. IT'S MAIN PRODUCT FITS
[01:46:34] IN THE HAND AND
[01:46:36] RESEMBLE A U SB DRIVE SO IT IS EASY TO
[01:46:37] CONCEAL AND USE IN
[01:46:44] SCHOOL AND IT IS SAID TO SOMETIMES BE
[01:46:45] USED EVEN IN THE MIDDLE
[01:46:47] OF CLASSES. THIS DEVICE ALSO PRODUCES
[01:46:48] LESS SMOKE THEN MANY
[01:46:52] OTHER OF THE E CIGARETTE BRANDS. ABOUT
[01:46:53] 200 PUFFS OF A JOULE
[01:46:58] POD FROM A POD SYSTEM SIMILAR TO POD
[01:46:59] SYSTEMS USED IN COFFEE
[01:47:03] MAKERS CAN CONTAIN AS MUCH NICOTINE AS A
[01:47:04] PACK OF CIGARETTES.
[01:47:07] ONE FULL POD IS EQUAL TO A 20 CIGARETTE
[01:47:08] PACK. THIS IS JOULE,
[01:47:14] THIS IS THE MAIN SUPPLIER OF THIS
[01:47:15] PRODUCT BASICALLY DELIVERS
[01:47:19] THE MOST NICOTINE. BEYOND THE CHEMISTRY
[01:47:20] OF THE NICOTINE
[01:47:27] ITSELF, E CIGARETTE COMPANIES HAVE COME
[01:47:28] UNDER FIRE WITH SWEET
[01:47:33] FLAVORS TO THE E LIQUIDS KNOWN TO APPEAL
[01:47:34] TO YOUNG PEOPLE.
[01:47:37] THEY SAY THE COMPANIES SAY THEY ARE
[01:47:38] DESIGNED FOR ADULTS
[01:47:42] QUITTING SMOKING, BUT WITH NAMES LIKE
[01:47:43] BAZOOKA VAMP, CANDY
[01:47:49] CANE, CHARLEY [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] RIP
[01:47:50] OFFS YOU HAVE TO WONDER
[01:47:52] WHO IS MOST LIKELY TO FIND THESE
[01:47:53] PRODUCTS ATTRACTIVE. THERE
[01:47:56] ARE NOW WELL OVER 15 ,000 UNIQUE FLAVORS
[01:47:57] AVAILABLE. AT
[01:48:04] PRESENT, THE CLINICAL COMMUNITY IS NOT
[01:48:05] CERTAIN HOW TO TREAT
[01:48:08] PEOPLE OF ANY AGE WHO ARE ADDICTED TO
[01:48:09] vaping. WHEN IT COMES
[01:48:13] TO SUPPORT FOR PARENTS AND KIDS
[01:48:14] RESOURCES ARE IT SCARCE. AS
[01:48:18] YOU MAY KNOW, A STUDY SESSION IS PLANNED
[01:48:19] WITH OUR CITY COUNCIL
[01:48:22] AND BEACH CITY HEALTH DISTRICT HOW TO
[01:48:23] WORK TOGETHER TO ADDRESS
Page 6 of 94
[01:48:26] THIS EPIDEMIC. AT PRESENT FOR
[01:48:27] INFORMATION ON WHAT YOU CAN DO
[01:48:32] AS A APPARENT OR CONCERNED NEIGHBOR OR
[01:48:33] WHO EVER MIGHT KNOW OF
[01:48:36] A CHILD WHO IS SUFFERING RIGHT NOW YOU
[01:48:37] SHOULD CONTACT THE
[01:48:40] PARENTS AGAINST vaping E CIGARETTES AND
[01:48:41] THAT IS THE NAME OF
[01:48:46] THE WEBSITE SO
[01:48:47] PARENTSAGAINSTvapingCIGARETTES.ORG. IT IS
[01:48:54] CLEAR WE KNOW THIS IS GOING ON IN THE
[01:48:55] BATHROOMS OF HIGH
[01:48:58] SCHOOLS AROUND SOUTH BAY TODAY, AND IS
[01:48:59] AN ISSUE THAT WE
[01:49:02] HAVEN'T BEGUN TO ADDRESS. I CAN'T
[01:49:03] EXPRESS TO YOU HOW
[01:49:06] IMPORTANT IT IS THAT WE TAKE STEPS ON A
[01:49:07] LOCAL LEVEL TO ADDRESS
[01:49:10] THIS PROBLEM BECAUSE IT MAY BE YEARS
[01:49:11] BEFORE THE FEDERAL
[01:49:14] GOVERNMENT REALLY DOES WHAT THEY NEED TO
[01:49:15] DO IN TERMS OF
[01:49:18] ADDRESSING IT. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR.
[01:49:20] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY OTHER
[01:49:21] ANNOUNCEMENTS? I HAVE ONE
[01:49:24] ANNOUNCEMENT OUR LAST REMINDER OF THE
[01:49:25] SECOND ANNUAL COMMUNITY
[01:49:28] WIDE GARAGE SALE. THE CITY OF HERMOSA
[01:49:29] BEACH WILL HOST THIS
[01:49:33] SATURDAY MARCH 30, 7 A.M. TO NOON WITH
[01:49:34] DOZENS OF GARAGE SALES
[01:49:38] THROUGHOUT HERMOSA BEACH. A MAP OF
[01:49:39] GARAGE SALE LOCATIONS WILL
[01:49:42] BE POSTED ON THE CITY WEBSITE,
[01:49:43] HERMOSABCH.ORG/COMMUNITY GARAGE
[01:49:50] SALE. WE ARE ON TO APPROVAL OF THE
[01:49:51] AGENDA. DO MY COLLEAGUES
[01:49:55] WANT TO TAKE A QUICK LOOK AND SEE IF
[01:49:56] THEY WANT TO APPROVE OR
[01:49:58] MAKE CHANGES? HAVE A MOTION?
[01:50:02] >> MADAM MAYOR I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE
[01:50:03] THE AGENDA OF TONIGHT'S
[01:50:07] MEETING.
[01:50:08] >> I SECOND.
[01:50:09] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[01:50:10] >> AYE.
[01:50:11] >> ALRIGHT. NEXT UP MADAM CLERK
Page 7 of 94
[01:50:12] PROCLAMATIONS.
[01:50:17] >> FIRST IS RECOGNIZING EARTH HOUR ON
[01:50:18] MARCH 30, 2019 FROM 8
[01:50:22] P.M. TO 9:30 P.M. AND EARTH DAY APRIL
[01:50:23] 22, 2019.
[01:50:28] >> ALRIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I HAVE
[01:50:29] A PROCLAMATION I
[01:50:31] WILL READ. WHEREAS, EARTH HOUR ORGANIZED
[01:50:32] BY THE WORLD
[01:50:35] WILDLIFE FUND IS A INITIATIVE THAT
[01:50:36] ENCOURAGE INDIVIDUALS
[01:50:38] BUSINESSES AND GOVERNMENTS AROUND THE
[01:50:39] WORLD TO TURN OFF ALL
[01:50:42] NON ESSENTIAL LIGHTS FOR ONE HOUR THIS
[01:50:43] SATURDAY MARCH 30
[01:50:46] BETWEEN 8:30 AND 9:30 P.M. THE GOAL IS
[01:50:47] DEMONSTRATE INDIVIDUAL
[01:50:54] ACTION ON A MASS SCALE CAN HELP
[01:50:55] POSITIVELY IMPACT THE PLANET,
[01:50:58] AND CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN CALIFORNIA
[01:50:59] ARE EXPECTED TO
[01:51:00] INCREASE THE SEVERITY OF WILDFIRES AND
[01:51:01] STORMS THREATENING
[01:51:05] HOMES BUSINESS AND UTILITIES AND
[01:51:06] DISRUPTING ROADWAYS, WHEREAS,
[01:51:09] LED BY THE WORLD WILDLIFE FUNDS HUNDREDS
[01:51:10] OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE
[01:51:14] ACROSS 180 COUNTRIES CELEBRATED EARTH
[01:51:15] HOUR IN 2018 WITH LIGHTS
[01:51:20] GOING OUT. SYDNEY OPERA HOUSE, BIG BEN
[01:51:21] AND HOUSE OF
[01:51:26] PARLIAMENT, TOKYO TOWER, EMPIRE STATE
[01:51:27] BUILDING, MARINA SANDS
[01:51:31] HOTEL IN SINGAPORE AND EIFFEL TOWER
[01:51:32] STOOD IN DARKNESS AS A
[01:51:39] LAND MARK ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. WHEREAS,
[01:51:40] THE CITY OF HERMOSA
[01:51:43] BEACH AND THE CITY COUNCIL WILL TURN OFF
[01:51:44] LIGHTS ON THE HER
[01:51:49] MOSEY BEACH HOUR. I HEREBY PROCLAIM THE
[01:51:50] HOUR BETWEEN 8:30 AND
[01:51:58] 9:30 P.M. THIS SATURDAY TO BE EARTH HOUR
[01:51:59] AND ENCOURAGE
[01:52:04] RESIDENT TO MAKE A STATEMENT OF CONCERN
[01:52:05] ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE
[01:52:06] AND DEMONSTRATE THE COMMITMENT TO
[01:52:07] FINDING SOLUTIONS BY TURNING
Page 8 of 94
[01:52:09] OFF ALL NON ESSENTIAL LIGHTS DURING THIS
[01:52:10] TIME PERIOD. MADAM
[01:52:13] CLERK.
[01:52:14] >> THANK YOU MADAM MAY. PROCLAMATION
[01:52:15] DECLARING APRIL AS
[01:52:23] DONATE LIFE MONTH.
[01:52:25] >> ALRIGHT. ARE TAMMY AND HOLLY
[01:52:26] HERE-PLEASE STEP TO THE
[01:52:30] PODIUM. DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT DONATE
[01:52:31] LIFE MONTH AND MAYBE
[01:52:41] YOUR STORY AND I'LL COME DOWN. I HAVE A
[01:52:42] PROCLAMATION.
[01:52:44] >> SURE. EACH APRIL IT'S NATIONAL DONATE
[01:52:45] LIFE MONTH
[01:52:52] RECOGNIZING ORGAN AND TISSUE DONATION
[01:52:53] AND THE IMPORTANCE
[01:52:56] THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES AND WORLD.
[01:52:57] HERE IN THE UNITED
[01:52:59] STATES THERE IS A 113 THOUSAND PEOPLE AT
[01:53:00] ANY ONE TIME ON THE
[01:53:03] ORGAN TRANSPLANT WAITING LIST AND 20
[01:53:04] PEOPLE DIE A DAY WAITING
[01:53:08] FOR ORGANS. LAST YEAR THERE WAS 36.500
[01:53:09] TRANSPLANTS BUT WE
[01:53:20] HAVE MORE THEN A HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE
[01:53:21] ON THE WAITING LIST
[01:53:25] SO THERE IS A URGENT NEED FOR PEOPLE TO
[01:53:26] SAY YES TO ORGAN
[01:53:29] DONATION AND EDUCATE THEMSELVES. HERE IN
[01:53:30] CALIFORNIA OR IN THE
[01:53:33] SOCAL AREA, THE LAST SATURDAY OF APRIL
[01:53:34] IS THE DONATE LIFE FUND
[01:53:39] WALK WHICH BRINGS ORGAN DONOR FAMILIES
[01:53:40] RECIPIENT LIKE HOLLY
[01:53:43] AND MYSELF AND PEOPLE WHO ARE REGISTERED
[01:53:44] AND JUST SUPPORT
[01:53:46] ORGAN DONATION TOGETHER AT THE DONATE
[01:53:47] LIFE RUN WALK AT CAL
[01:53:51] STATE FULLERTON. IT IS A OPPORTUNITY FOR
[01:53:52] PEOPLE TO SEE THAT
[01:53:54] THROUGH TRAGEDY WHEN PEOPLE DO-PASS AWAY
[01:53:55] AND THE ORGANS ARE
[01:54:01] DONATED THROUGH TRAGEDY LIFE COULD BE
[01:54:02] GIVEN TO PEOPLE AND THEY
[01:54:05] CELEBRATE THE LEGACY OF THE LOVED ONES
[01:54:06] LIFE THROUGH THE ORGANS
[01:54:09] DONATED KNOWING SOMEBODY'S LIFE WAS
Page 9 of 94
[01:54:10] SAVED. HOLLY AND I WERE
[01:54:14] RECIPIENT OF LIVING ORGAN DONATION SO
[01:54:15] STORY IS DIFFERENT. MY
[01:54:18] SISTER DONATED HER KIDNEY TO ME IN 1986
[01:54:19] SO THIS YEAR IT WILL
[01:54:23] BE 33 YEARS I WILL BE CELEBRATING MY
[01:54:24] ORGAN TRANSPLANT AND SO
[01:54:30] FORTUNATE BECAUSE THERE ARE SO MANY
[01:54:31] STILL WAITING FOR THE CALL
[01:54:32] FOR THE PERSON. THROUGH THE EFFORTS OF
[01:54:33] THE DMV, THEY
[01:54:39] PARTNERING WITH DONATE LIFE MORE THEN 95
[01:54:40] PERCENT OF ORGAN
[01:54:43] REGISTRATION IN CALIFORNIA ARE BECAUSE
[01:54:44] OF THE PARTNERSHIP WITH
[01:54:46] THE DMV SO THEY PLAY A VITAL ROLE AND
[01:54:47] WHY IT IS DMV DONATE
[01:54:51] LIFE IN CALIFORNIA. LET ME JUST LOOK
[01:54:52] DOWN HERE FOR A MOMENT-I
[01:54:57] GOT A COUPLE OTHER THINGS TO SHARE WITH
[01:54:58] YOU.
[01:54:59] >> SURE.
[01:55:00] >> I ALSO WANTED-I MENTIONED HOLLY AND I
[01:55:01] ARE RECIPIENT OF
[01:55:07] LIVING DONATION SO I WANTED TO SHARE
[01:55:08] THAT IN 2018 THERE WERE A
[01:55:11] LITTLE MORE IN THE 6400 LIVING ORGAN
[01:55:12] KIDNEY TRANSPLANTS.
[01:55:22] THERE IS A GREAT NEED WHEN YOU HAVE THAT
[01:55:23] MANY PEOPLE WHO ARE
[01:55:25] SAYING YES TO LIVING ORGAN DONATION YET
[01:55:26] WE HAVE THIS
[01:55:29] TREMENDOUS NUMBER ON THE WAITING LIST. I
[01:55:30] MENTIONED THE
[01:55:34] RUN/WALK. HOLLY HAS A TEAM, IT IS TEAM
[01:55:35] SKETCHERS SO IF-WEPT
[01:55:41] TO INVITE THE COMMUNITY TO COME OUT AND
[01:55:42] HER TEAM IS TEAM
[01:55:46] SKETCHER WHEN YOU GO TO
[01:55:47] DONATELIFERUNWALK.ORG YOU CAN CLICK
[01:55:58] OWN HER TEAM AND BE A PART THE TEAM AND
[01:55:59] WANT TO ENCOURAGE
[01:56:01] EVERYBODY TO HAVE A CONVERSATION. IT
[01:56:02] PROBABLY ISN'T A EASY
[01:56:04] CONVERSATION TO HAVE BUT IT IS NECESSARY
[01:56:05] BECAUSE IF THE
[01:56:08] CIRCUMSTANCES COME UP WHERE SOMEBODY
Page 10 of 94
[01:56:09] MIGHT BE IN THE POSITION
[01:56:11] TO BE A ORGAN DONOR WE HOPE PEOPLE WOULD
[01:56:12] HAVE HAD THE
[01:56:15] CONVERSATION. THEY CAN HAVE THE
[01:56:16] CONVERSATION AND LEARN MORE
[01:56:17] ABOUT ORGAN DONATION BY GOING TO
[01:56:18] DONATELIFECALIFORNIA.ORG OR
[01:56:22] DONEVIDACALIFORNIA.ORG. HOLLY.
[01:56:26] >> I'LL TELL YOU BUT MYSELF AND STORY, I
[01:56:27] RECEIVED A KIDNEY
[01:56:31] TRANSPLANT THIS PAST MARCH 6 WAS MY 19TH
[01:56:32] YEAR. I RECEIVED A
[01:56:36] KIDNEY FROM MY COUSIN AND AS TAMMY SAID,
[01:56:37] HAVING THAT
[01:56:40] CONVERSATION WITH YOUR FAMILY IS ALWAYS
[01:56:41] TOUGH. WHO WANTS TO
[01:56:43] TALK ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU PASSED
[01:56:44] AWAY? FOR THAT REASON
[01:56:47] I DIDN'T-MY WHOLE FAMILY-WE KEPT IT
[01:56:48] QUITE AND DIDN'T TELL
[01:56:52] ANYBODY I WAS SICK. [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS]
[01:56:53] FANGARY WAS MY
[01:56:57] FORMER BOSS AND WENT THROUGH IT WITH ME
[01:56:58] AND HE WATCHED ME
[01:57:04] DETERIORATE FROM 195 POUNDS TO 122
[01:57:05] POUNDS. WE DIDN'T TELL ME
[01:57:11] FAMILY OR ANYBODY UNTIL IT WAS APPARENT
[01:57:12] I WAS IN NEED OF A
[01:57:15] KIDNEY. I WAS LIVING ON DIALYSIS AND IT
[01:57:16] IS TOUCH SITUATION
[01:57:22] BUT AS TAMMY SAID I WAS LUCKY MY COUSIN
[01:57:23] STEPPED UP, SHE WAS A
[01:57:27] MARCH MATCH.
[01:57:29] >> THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. TJ IF WE
[01:57:30] HAVE A MICROPHONE I
[01:57:32] WILL WALK DOWN AND PRESENT WITH THE
[01:57:33] PROCLAMATION BUT THINK IT
[01:57:36] IS IMPORTANT YOU ARE HERE TO TELL YOUR
[01:57:37] STORY AND REMIND HOW
[01:57:40] IMPORTANT IT IS TO REGISTER AND KNOW
[01:57:41] ABOUT LIVING DONORS AS
[01:57:43] WELL SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[01:57:45] (APPLAUSE)
[01:57:52] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'M GOING TO
[01:57:53] PRESENT WITH THE
[01:57:58] PROCLAMATION. WHEREAS, ORGAN TISSUE
[01:57:59] MARROW AND BLOOD DONATION
Page 11 of 94
[01:58:01] ARE LIE GIVING ACTS RECOGNIZED WORLD
[01:58:02] WIDE AS EXPRESSION OF
[01:58:09] COMPASSION IN NEED. 113 THOUSAND
[01:58:10] INDIVIDUALS AND 21 THOUSAND
[01:58:12] IN CALIFORNIA ARE ON THE NATIONAL ORGAN
[01:58:13] TRANSPLANT WAITING
[01:58:16] LIST AND ON AVERAGE 20 PEOPLE A DAY DIE
[01:58:17] WAITING FOR THE SHORT
[01:58:19] AGE OF DONATED ORGANS, WHEREAS, MORE
[01:58:20] THEN 600 THOUSAND UNITS
[01:58:23] OF BLOOD PER YEAR ARE NEEDED TO MEET THE
[01:58:24] NEED IN CALIFORNIA
[01:58:29] AND A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL DONATION OF
[01:58:30] HEART, LIVER, LUNGS,
[01:58:32] KIDNEY PANCREAS AND SMALL INTESTINE CAN
[01:58:33] SAVE 8 LIVES DONATION
[01:58:38] OF TISSUE CAN SAVE AND HEEL THE LIVES OF
[01:58:39] 75 OTHERS AND SINGLE
[01:58:43] DONATION CAN HELP THREE PEOPLE IN NEED
[01:58:44] AND WHEREAS, THE SPIRIT
[01:58:45] OF GIVING AND DECISION TO DONATE ARE NOT
[01:58:46] RESTRICTED BY AGE AND
[01:58:51] MEDICAL CONDITION AND CALIFORNIA
[01:58:52] RESIDENTS CAN SIGN UP WITH
[01:58:53] DONATE LIFE CALIFORNIA DONOR REGISTRY
[01:58:54] APPLYING OR RENEWING THE
[01:59:00] DRIVERS LICENSE AND BE RESOLVED IN
[01:59:01] RECOGNITION OF NATIONAL
[01:59:06] DONATE LIFE MONTH APRIL 2019 IS HEREBY
[01:59:07] PROCLAIMED DONATE LIFE
[01:59:11] CALIFORNIA MONTH IN HERMOSA BEACH AND IN
[01:59:12] DOING SO WE ENCOURAGE
[01:59:14] ALL CALIFORNIANS TO SIGN UP WITH THE
[01:59:15] DONATE LIFE REGISTRY AT
[01:59:20] DONATELIFECALIFORNIA.ORG OR [INAUDIBLE
[01:59:21] COMMENTS] THANK YOU
[01:59:26] BOTH SO MUCH. IF I CAN INVITE MY
[01:59:27] COLLEAGUES TO COME DOWN FOR
[01:59:31] A PICTURE IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND. THANK
[01:59:32] YOU.
[02:00:50] >> EVERYONE KNOWS TO REGISTER TO DONATE.
[02:00:51] I THINK WE ARE ONTO
[02:00:56] MADAM CITY MANAGER, DO YOU HAVE UPDATES?
[02:00:57] NO, OKAY. I THINK
[02:01:00] MADAM CLERK WE CAN MOVE ON TO PUBLIC
[02:01:01] PARTICIPATION.
[02:01:08] >> THANK YOU. THE CITY COUNCIL VALUES
Page 12 of 94
[02:01:09] YOUR COMMENTS THE BROWN
[02:01:12] ACT PROHIBITS THE COUNCIL TAKING ACTION
[02:01:13] ON A MATTER NOT LIST
[02:01:15] SAID ON THE POSTED AGENDA AS A BUSINESS
[02:01:16] ITEM. WE HAVE ONE
[02:01:19] WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, LETTER FROM
[02:01:20] HOWARD LONGACRE. THIS IS
[02:01:25] THE TIME FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
[02:01:26] ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON
[02:01:29] ANY ITEMS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION NOT ON
[02:01:30] THE AGENDA ON ITEMS
[02:01:33] TO WHICH PUBLIC COMMENT WILL NOT BE
[02:01:34] TAKEN SUCH AS
[02:01:42] MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC COMMENTS
[02:01:43] CALLED MISCELLANEOUS
[02:01:45] REPORTS AND OTHER MATTERS ARE ONLY HEARD
[02:01:46] AT THIS TIME.
[02:01:48] COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ARE ONLY
[02:01:49] HEARD IN PUBLIC HEARING.
[02:01:54] MEMBERS MAY SPEAK ON ITEMS REMOVED FROM
[02:01:55] CUB SENT OF ITEMS
[02:02:01] APPEARING UNDER MUNICIPAL MATTERS.
[02:02:02] COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO 3
[02:02:08] MINUTES. ANY OTHER MATTER WITHIN THE
[02:02:09] JURISDICTION IS ASKED TO
[02:02:12] FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD. THE PURPOSE OF
[02:02:13] THE CARD IS TO
[02:02:16] STREAMLINE AND BETTER ORGANIZE OUR
[02:02:17] PUBLIC COMMENT PROCESS TO
[02:02:19] INSURE SPEAKERS NAMES ARE PROVIDED IN
[02:02:20] THE MINUTES AND WHERE
[02:02:23] APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE CONTACT
[02:02:24] INFORMATION FOR STAFF
[02:02:26] FOLLOW-UP. THERE ARE CARDS IN THE OVER
[02:02:27] BY THE CAMERA OPERATOR
[02:02:32] ROOM THERE ON THAT TABLE AND IF YOU DO
[02:02:33] NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT
[02:02:36] WOULD LIKE THE RECORD TO REFLECT YOUR
[02:02:37] OPINION, PLEASE FILL OUT
[02:02:40] A CARD AS WITH EL. THANK YOU.
[02:02:42] >> I WANTED TO TAKE A MOMENT TO REMIND
[02:02:43] EVERYONE ABOUT OUR
[02:02:45] PUBLIC COMMENT AND BASIC DE QUORUM. WE
[02:02:46] NEED TO MAKE SURE WE
[02:02:53] OFFER CIVILITY AND RESPECT TO EVERYONE
[02:02:54] IN THE ROOM. WE WILL
[02:02:58] NOT TOLERATE DEMONSTRATIONS, CHEERING,
Page 13 of 94
[02:02:59] YELLING, WHISTLING,
[02:03:03] HAND CLAPPING OR ANY KIND OF DISRUPTION
[02:03:04] OR ANYTHING THAT
[02:03:08] DISTURBS THE REGULAR ORDERLY CONDUCT OF
[02:03:09] OUR CITY COUNCIL
[02:03:12] MEETING. HOWEVER, OUR FORMER MAYOR AND
[02:03:13] COUNCIL MEMBER DUCLOS
[02:03:19] DID OFFER SOMETHING AT ONE OF THE LAST
[02:03:20] MEETINGS WHERE WE
[02:03:23] DISCUSSED THE INFILTRATION PROJECT AND
[02:03:24] AS SOMEONE IN YOUR
[02:03:27] CHAIR FOR MANY YEARS, I UNDERSTAND THE
[02:03:28] NEED AND WANT TO
[02:03:32] SUPPORT THOSE THAT HAVE LIKE-MINDED
[02:03:33] IDEAS AND POSITIONS, AND I
[02:03:37] THINK IT WAS VERY EFFECTIVE IF YOU
[02:03:38] AGREE-YOU CAN USE YOUR
[02:03:43] FINGERS JUST LIKE THAT AND IT ISN'T
[02:03:44] DISRUPTIVE AND SUPPORTIVE
[02:03:48] AND THOUGHT THAT WAS A GREAT USE-
[02:03:49] >> THINK JAZZ HANDS.
[02:03:52] >> THINK JAZZ HANDS, YEAH. WE ALSO ASK
[02:03:53] YOU RESPECT THE RIGHTS
[02:03:58] OF OTHERS AND ALLOW EVERYONE TO EXPRESS
[02:03:59] THEIR OPINION WITHOUT
[02:04:02] NOISE AND DISTURBANCE AND PLEASE TAKE
[02:04:03] SIDE CONVERSATIONS INTO
[02:04:05] THE COURT YARD. WE ALSO PLEASE ASK YOUR
[02:04:06] COMMENTS ARE FOCUSED
[02:04:10] ON THE ISSUE PRESENTED AND PLEASE AVOID
[02:04:11] PERSONAL ATTACKS AS
[02:04:13] MUCH AS YOU WANT TO TOWARDS COUNCIL,
[02:04:14] STAFF, AND ANYONE ELSE IN
[02:04:18] THE AUDIENCE. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK
[02:04:19] DURING PUBLIC
[02:04:22] COMMENT, WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER, THERE
[02:04:23] IS THE COMMENT CARDS
[02:04:26] IN THE BACK OF THE ROOM AT THE BLACK
[02:04:27] TABLE. PLEASE FILL OUT A
[02:04:30] CARD. EACH SPEAKER-THERE IS A LOT OF
[02:04:31] PEOPLE AND WE COULD HAVE
[02:04:34] WHITTLED IT DOWN TO TWO MINUTES BUT
[02:04:35] WE'LL GIVE EVERYONE THE
[02:04:37] THREE MINUTES TO TALK TONIGHT. WE WILL
[02:04:38] NOT ALLOW YOU TO
[02:04:41] TRANSFER YOUR TIME TO SOMEONE ELSE, SO
[02:04:42] WHEN YOU ARE AT THE
Page 14 of 94
[02:04:45] PODIUM IT IS YOU SPEAKING, NOT HAVING
[02:04:46] SOMEONE ELSE SPEAK FOR
[02:04:48] YOU. WHEN YOU SPEAK IF YOU DON'T MIND
[02:04:49] PLEASE STATING YOUR
[02:04:52] NAME SO WE CAN GET THE MINUTES CORRECT.
[02:04:53] AND SIMPLE REMINDER
[02:04:57] THAT IT CAN SEEM FRUSTRATING BUT PUBLIC
[02:04:58] COMMENT ISN'T A
[02:05:02] OPPORTUNITY FOR A TWO WAY DIALOGUE
[02:05:03] BETWEEN THE SPEAKER AND
[02:05:05] COUNCIL AND STAFF. WE DO TAKE NOTES UP
[02:05:06] HERE ON ALL PUBLIC
[02:05:10] COMMENTS AND WE WILL ADDRESS THOSE
[02:05:11] QUESTIONS WITH STAFF ONCE
[02:05:14] ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED,
[02:05:15] AND FAILURE TO ADHERE
[02:05:23] TO THE PROCEDURE WILL RESULT IN REQUEST
[02:05:24] TO KINDLY LEAVE
[02:05:27] COUNCIL CHAMBERS BUT DON'T ANTICIPATE
[02:05:28] THAT HAPPENING. I ALSO
[02:05:30] REMIND YOU THAT THIS PERIOD RIGHT NOW IS
[02:05:31] PUBLIC COMMENT REALLY
[02:05:34] FOR ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA. WE
[02:05:35] WORKED REALLY HARD TO MAKE
[02:05:37] SURE THIS AGENDA CONSISTED SOLELY FOR
[02:05:38] THE PURPOSE OF
[02:05:43] DISCUSSING THE INFILTRATION PROJECT AS
[02:05:44] THE PUBLIC HEARING SO
[02:05:47] NOW IF YOU ARE IN THE AUDIENCE AND HAVE
[02:05:48] SOMETHING TO TALK
[02:05:50] ABOUT THAT'S NOT ON THE AGENDA WE INVITE
[02:05:51] YOU FORWARD TO SPEAK.
[02:05:55] I'LL GO THROUGH THE SPEAKER CARDS TO
[02:05:56] SEE-MADAM CLERK, DO YOU
[02:05:59] HAVE ANY CARDS FOR SOMETHING THAT IS NOT
[02:06:00] ON THE AGENDA?
[02:06:05] >> YES, I DO, MADAM MAYOR. I HAVE-WE
[02:06:06] HAVE A FEW PEOPLE WHO
[02:06:11] LIKE TO SPEAK DURING PUBLIC
[02:06:12] PARTICIPATION ABOUT THE GREEN BELT
[02:06:14] PROJECT NOW.
[02:06:15] >> OKAY.
[02:06:16] >> BUT, WE HAVE 6 PEOPLE I CAN CALL THEM
[02:06:17] ALL FORWARD IF YOU
[02:06:23] LIKE OR AT LEAST LET THEM KNOW THE
[02:06:24] ORDER.
[02:06:28] >> CALL 3 AT A TIME.
Page 15 of 94
[02:06:30] >> FIRST IS JUDITH MANGO, TRENT LARSSON
[02:06:31] AND HEIDI SWAN.
[02:06:35] >> ALRIGHT. JUDITH.
[02:06:38] >> GOOD EVENING EVERYONE. JUDY MANGO.
[02:06:39] 501 [INAUDIBLE
[02:06:44] COMMENTS] SORRY I CANNOT STAY LONGER
[02:06:45] TONIGHT AND CHOOSING TO
[02:06:47] SPEAK NOW. OVER THE LAST 6 MONTHS WE HAD
[02:06:48] APPROXIMATELY 20
[02:06:54] DAYS OF RAINFALL. IF THIS INFILTRATION
[02:06:55] PROJECT HAD GONE
[02:07:00] FORWARD, WE WOULD HAVE HAD 48 MILLION
[02:07:01] GALLONS OF WATER
[02:07:06] INJECTED INTO THE SOIL THAT IS BASED ON
[02:07:07] 2.4 MILLION GALLONS
[02:07:11] PER STORM SURGE. THAT WOULD HAVE INJECT
[02:07:12] TODAY THE SOIL OF THE
[02:07:18] GREEN BELT OVER THAT SHORT PERIOD OF
[02:07:19] TIME. WHICH IS A
[02:07:22] RELATIVELY SMALL AREA ABOUT 100 FEET BY
[02:07:23] 420 FEET LONG. IT IS
[02:07:27] JUST INCONCEIVABLE THAT THERE WOULD NOT
[02:07:28] BE SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE
[02:07:32] TO THE HOMES THAT SIT DIRECTLY IN FRONT
[02:07:33] OF THE AREA THAT IS
[02:07:38] DESIGNATED FOR THE INFILTRATION PROJECT.
[02:07:39] THIS IS JUST A RISK
[02:07:43] THAT NONE OF US WANT TO TAKE. THE GREEN
[02:07:44] BELT AND FOR THAT
[02:07:50] MATTER SOUTH PARK ARE JUST NOT VIABLE
[02:07:51] SITES FOR THIS PROJECT,
[02:07:56] A PROJECT OF THIS MAGNITUDE. THEREFORE,
[02:07:57] I IMPLORE YOU TO VOTE
[02:08:02] TO DISSOLVE THE MOU. RETURN THE GRANT
[02:08:03] MONEY. AND LET EACH
[02:08:09] CITY DEAL WITH THEIR PROPORTIONATE SHARE
[02:08:10] OF THE RUN-OFF.
[02:08:14] THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.
[02:08:17] >> THANK YOU. THANK YOU TO OUR AUDIENCE
[02:08:18] MEMBERS. TRENT.
[02:08:26] >> HELLO. TRENT LARSSON. I LIKE TO TALK
[02:08:27] TO YOU TONIGHT ABOUT
[02:08:30] THE INFILTRATION PROJECT AND ACTUALLY
[02:08:31] INTO A BIGGER PICTURE
[02:08:34] ABOUT IT. BECAUSE I THINK WHAT WE HAVE
[02:08:35] REALLY IS A
[02:08:36] OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE THIS THING A WIN,
Page 16 of 94
[02:08:37] WIN FOR EVERYBODY. BUT
[02:08:40] AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE IS A LOT OF
[02:08:41] OPPOSITION TO THIS IN
[02:08:43] PUTTING THIS INTO OUR SMALL PUBLIC
[02:08:44] SPACES. THERE REALLY IS.
[02:08:48] THERE IS A LOT OF CONCERN AND RIGHTLY
[02:08:49] SO. I'M A BELIEVER IN
[02:08:54] THE COUNTRY WE CAN BUILD THINGS BUT
[02:08:55] SOMETIMES WE SHOULDN'T DO
[02:09:00] IT AND LOOK FOR ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY AND
[02:09:01] WE HAVE A GREAT
[02:09:03] OPPORTUNITY HERE. WE HAVE THE AES SITE
[02:09:04] 51 ACRES WHICH ISN'T
[02:09:07] THE SAME FOREVER AND IT NEEDS A TON OF
[02:09:08] PUBLIC MONEY. IT NEEDS
[02:09:12] MONEY FROM REDONDO AND THE STATE OF
[02:09:13] CALIFORNIA AND THE FEDERAL
[02:09:17] GOVERNMENT TO MAKE THIS WORK. THAT WHOLE
[02:09:18] AREA AND INCLUDING
[02:09:21] THE REDONDO PIER NEEDS A LOT OF
[02:09:22] INVESTMENT SO THIS
[02:09:26] INFILTRATION PROJECT COULD BE A GREAT
[02:09:27] KICK-STARTER FOR THAT
[02:09:30] PROPERTY. IT COULD BE THE FIRST THING
[02:09:31] THAT GOES IN AND OTHER
[02:09:34] THINGS CAN BE BUILT AROUND IT. YOU DON'T
[02:09:35] BUILD A WHOLE
[02:09:37] PROJECT WITHOUT STARTING ON SOMETHING
[02:09:38] FIRST AND WE CAN FUNNEL
[02:09:40] THE PUBLIC FUNDS INTO THAT PROPERTY AND
[02:09:41] I KNOW THAT THE
[02:09:44] COUNCIL-EVERYBODY WANTS A CLEAN OCEAN,
[02:09:45] THERE ISN'T ONE PERSON
[02:09:50] THAT DOESN'T WANT THE OCEAN CLEANER SO
[02:09:51] YOU WILL NOT GET
[02:09:55] PUSH-BACK FROM THE POPULOUS BUT YOU HAVE
[02:09:56] TO GET PUSH BACK FROM
[02:10:07] REDONDO BEACH. IT ONLY REQUIRES YOUR
[02:10:08] VOTE SO WHAT I ASK YOU
[02:10:10] AS A COUNCIL TO LISTEN TO ALL OF THE
[02:10:11] PEOPLE HERE AND MAKE A
[02:10:14] VOTE THAT SAYS WE ARE GOING TO PUT THIS
[02:10:15] OFF AND MAKE IT
[02:10:18] BETTER, AND WE NEED TO GET [INAUDIBLE
[02:10:19] COMMENTS] WE NEED TED
[02:10:24] LOU FOR FEDERAL FUNDS. WE NEED SENATOR
[02:10:25] BEN ALLEN BECAUSE WE
Page 17 of 94
[02:10:31] ARE CAUGHT IN THE PICKLE BECAUSE THIS
[02:10:32] PROJECT SOUNDED GOOD AND
[02:10:35] WE GOT OUT OVER OUR SKIS AND NOW IN A
[02:10:36] PICKLE WHERE WE ARE PUT
[02:10:39] UPON BY A AGENCY THAT IS THREATENING US
[02:10:40] AND I DON'T LIKE THAT.
[02:10:43] NOT ONE BIT. I THINK THEY NEED TO COME
[02:10:44] DOWN HERE AND SEE THIS
[02:10:47] IF THAT IS WHAT THEY DO SO WE CAN DO
[02:10:48] SMALLER PROJECTS AND RUN
[02:10:50] THE STORM DRAINS OFF THE HILL TO THE
[02:10:51] GREEN BELT AND SMALL
[02:10:55] PIPES LIKE MANHATTAN BEACH WE CAN FIX
[02:10:56] STUFF ON THE BEACH AND
[02:11:00] TAKE CARE OF ALL THE GOOD FAITH GOOD
[02:11:01] WILL BUT SHOULD TRY TO
[02:11:05] PUNT THIS TO THE AES SITE AND DO IT
[02:11:06] THERE. THANK YOU VERY
[02:11:09] MUCH. THANK YOU.
[02:11:16] >> HELLO. MY NAME IS HEIDI SWAN AND MET
[02:11:17] JEFF DUCLOS LAST WEEK
[02:11:24] AT A VAPOR EVENT AND SUGGESTED I COME
[02:11:25] HERE TO ASK FOR YOUR
[02:11:28] SUPPORT. FOR THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW 420 IS
[02:11:29] THE TIME OF DAY
[02:11:33] MARIJUANA ENTHUSIAST LIKE TO GO OUT AND
[02:11:34] GET HIGH. THAT THEN
[02:11:39] HAS MADE APRIL 20, 4-20 AN UNOFFICIAL
[02:11:40] HOLIDAY FOR THE POT
[02:11:48] ENTHUSIASTS. LAST YEAR IN 2018 THE
[02:11:49] JOURNAL OF AMERICAN
[02:11:54] MEDICINE PUBLISHED A STUDY WHICH SHOWED
[02:11:55] ON APRIL 20 NATIONWIDE
[02:12:01] TRAFFIC FATALITIES ROSE BY 12 PERCENT.
[02:12:02] THIS IS A DEVASTATING
[02:12:10] NUMBER AND COMPARABLE TO THAT OF
[02:12:11] SUPERBOWL SUNDAY OR 4TH OF
[02:12:15] JULY WEEKEND, MAYBE EVEN NEW YEARS EVE.
[02:12:16] WHEN I SAW THIS
[02:12:20] INFORMATION I CONTACTED OUR LOCAL POLICE
[02:12:21] STATION AND ASKED FOR
[02:12:24] THEIR SUPPORT AND REDONDO BEACH WAS THE
[02:12:25] FIRST TO JUMP ON IT
[02:12:32] AND SAID THIS IS A GOOD INFORMATION AND
[02:12:33] THANK YOU FOR SHARING
[02:12:35] AND GET GRANT MONEY TO PUT PATROL OUT
[02:12:36] THAT NIGHT AND ISSUE A
Page 18 of 94
[02:12:40] PRESS RELEASE. I ASKED HERMOSA WHAT THEY
[02:12:41] WANTED TO DO AND
[02:12:48] THOUGHT IT WAS GREAT TOO BUT HAVEN'T
[02:12:49] GOTTEN BACK. I ENCOURAGE
[02:12:55] YOUR SUPPORT TO JOIN WITH REDONDO BEACH
[02:12:56] AND CHECK POINTS AS
[02:12:59] COUNCIL MEMBER DUCLOS SUGGESTED BECAUSE
[02:13:00] WE HAVE GOT TO LET
[02:13:02] PEOPLE KNOW THAT MARIJUANA IMPAIRED
[02:13:03] DRIVING IS VERY DANGEROUS.
[02:13:07] IN LEGALIZED STATES, MARIJUANA IMPAIRED
[02:13:08] DRIVING TRAFFIC
[02:13:12] FATALITIES HAS GONE WAY UP. INTERESTING
[02:13:13] ALCOHOL IMPAIRED
[02:13:16] TRAFFIC FATALITIES HAVE STAYED PRETTY
[02:13:17] MUCH THE SAME SO IT IS
[02:13:20] MARIJUANA IMPAIRED DRIVING THAT IS
[02:13:21] REALLY DANGEROUS NOW. IF
[02:13:23] YOU PUT ONE BEER IN N TO SOMEONE WHO HAD
[02:13:24] MARIJUANA THEIR RISK
[02:13:29] FOR FATALITIES HAS GONE UP
[02:13:30] EXPONENTIALLY. IT IS THE
[02:13:34] COMBINATION OF ALCOHOL AND MARIJUANA
[02:13:35] TOGETHER MOST LETHAL
[02:13:39] OPPOSED TO JUST BEING ALCOHOL IMPAIRED
[02:13:40] OR MARIJUANA IMPAIRED
[02:13:44] ON ITS OWN. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK FOR YOUR
[02:13:45] SUPPORT AND I HOPE
[02:13:47] THAT YOU CAN DO THAT AND WE HAVE A
[02:13:48] OPPORTUNITY TO SAVE
[02:13:53] COUNTLESS LIVES AND CAN BE LEADERS IN
[02:13:54] THE SOUTH BAY AND IN
[02:13:56] FACT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BECAUSE THIS IS
[02:13:57] A DATE THAT EVERYONE
[02:14:00] IN LEGALIZED STATES NEEDS TO BE AWARE
[02:14:01] OF. THANK YOU.
[02:14:04] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[02:14:05] >> I HAVE DOCUMENTS FOR YOU.
[02:14:15] >> MADAM CLERK, DO YOU HAVE MORE CARDS?
[02:14:21] >> I DO THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THE NEXT
[02:14:22] 3 ARE ANTHONY
[02:14:30] HIGGINS, SARAH HARPER AND NICOLE BIRD.
[02:14:39] >> GOOD EVENING.
[02:14:40] >> HI. YOU ALREADY HAVE MY NAME SO I
[02:14:41] GUESS I DON'T HAVE TO
[02:14:46] REPEAT IT. LAST COUNCIL MEETING THERE
[02:14:47] WAS I SUBMITTED A
Page 19 of 94
[02:14:54] WRITTEN COMMUNICATION AND THERE WAS SOME
[02:14:55] DISCUSSION FOLLOWING
[02:15:00] MY COMMENTS ABOUT ACTIONS THAT THE CITY
[02:15:01] WANTED STAFF TO FOLLOW
[02:15:06] UP ON. I'M HAVING TROUBLE FINDING THAT
[02:15:07] DOCUMENTED IN ANY OF
[02:15:14] THE MINUTES, IN ANY OF THE-THERE'S NO
[02:15:15] RECORD OF IT ANYWHERE-IT
[02:15:28] WAS A RATHER COMPLICATED ISSUE. THE
[02:15:29] ISSUE SHOULD BE
[02:15:31] DOCUMENTED, AND WHEN STAFF GETS BACK TO
[02:15:32] THE CITY COUNCIL THE
[02:15:39] PERSON INVOLVED IN IT, NAMELY ME, SHOULD
[02:15:40] BE NOTIFIED. I
[02:15:43] SHOULD BE ABLE IT GO ONLINE OR SOMETHING
[02:15:44] AND FIND THE RECORD
[02:15:46] OF WHAT WAS REQUESTED. YET, THERE IS
[02:15:47] NONE. THAT TO ME IS
[02:15:52] JUST ACCOUNTABILITY 101. I DON'T WANT TO
[02:15:53] TELL YOU HOW TO
[02:15:58] SOLVE THAT PROBLEM, BUT IT DOES NEED TO
[02:15:59] BE SOLVED. THERE JUST
[02:16:02] NEEDS TO BE ACCOUNTABILITY. I WANTED TO
[02:16:03] GIVE YOU A QUICK
[02:16:06] UPDATE ON THE ST. PATTY'S DAY TRAFFIC ON
[02:16:07] 27TH. ABOUT 5 HOURS
[02:16:14] OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC. 35 PERCENT OF THE
[02:16:15] TIME IT WAS BACKED
[02:16:20] UP FROM VALLEY DRIVE ALL THE WAY UP OVER
[02:16:21] THE CREST ON 27TH
[02:16:25] DOWN TO THE BEACH. YOU COUPLE THE ST.
[02:16:26] PATTY'S HOLIDAY WITH 3
[02:16:33] DAYS MEMORIAL DAY AND LABOR DAY FIESTA
[02:16:34] AND WHEN DONE 27TH
[02:16:42] STREET GET A HOLIDAY? NO, SURPRISINGLY
[02:16:43] MOST OF THE TRAFFIC
[02:16:46] WAS EAST BOUND. EVEN AT 10 A.M. I
[02:16:47] SUSPECT PEOPLE WERE
[02:16:52] LEAVING THE CITY WHEN THEY COULD. THERE
[02:16:53] ARE MITIGATIONS
[02:16:57] THERE. I HAD REQUESTED THAT MAYBE IT
[02:16:58] MADE SENSE TO HAVE A
[02:17:01] TRAFFIC ENGINEER ON SITE SO WE CAN
[02:17:02] OBSERVE WHAT WAS GOING ON.
[02:17:05] FOR INSTANCE, YOU COULD USE LONG FELLOW,
[02:17:06] YOU COULD USE SECOND
[02:17:10] STREET, YOU CAN CATCH THE TRAFFIC COMING
Page 20 of 94
[02:17:11] OUT AND USE MULTIPLE
[02:17:14] ROUTES. IN 24 SECONDS--THE OTHER PROBLEM
[02:17:15] I HAVE IS THERE IS
[02:17:25] JUST A WHOLE LOT OF CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC
[02:17:26] FOR AREAS THAT ARE A
[02:17:33] QUARTER OF MILE FROM PIER AVENUE USING
[02:17:34] 27TH. WHY? WHY CAN'T
[02:17:40] THE CITY AS PART OF THE PERMIT PROCESS
[02:17:41] DIRECT THE TRUCK ROUTE?
[02:17:46] THOSE ARE JUST SOME THOUGHTS. IT IS A
[02:17:47] COMPLICATED ISSUE, BUT
[02:17:51] IT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.
[02:17:52] >> THANK YOU. SARAH.
[02:17:54] >> GOOD EVENING. SARAH HARPER, LIBRARY
[02:17:55] MANAGER AT HERMOSA
[02:18:06] BEACH LIBRARY AND WANT TO HIGHLIGHT A
[02:18:07] COUPLE PROGRAMS COMING
[02:18:09] UP IN APRIL APRIL 12 AT 330 WE HAVE A
[02:18:10] SPECIAL PROGRAM FOR
[02:18:15] CHILDREN AND FAMILIES STORIES FROM THE
[02:18:16] LAND OF IMAGINATION
[02:18:18] WITH MS [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] WHO LIVES
[02:18:19] IN THE LAND OF
[02:18:22] IMAGINATION AND WILL COME FOR A VISIT TO
[02:18:23] OUR HERMOSA BEACH
[02:18:27] LIBRARY TO SHARE HER STORIES WITH OUR
[02:18:28] FAMILIES. AND ALSO ON
[02:18:32] SATURDAY APRIL 20 FROM 3 TO 4 P.M. WE
[02:18:33] HAVE A SPECIAL UKULELE
[02:18:39] CONCERT PERFORMED BY MITCH CHANG, THE
[02:18:40] FOUNDER OF THE SOUTHERN
[02:18:45] CALIFORNIA FESTIVAL AND LOS ANGELES
[02:18:46] INTERNATIONAL UKULELE
[02:18:51] FESTIVAL. DEMONSTRATE BASIC PLAY ING
[02:18:52] TECHNIQUES FOR BOTH. AS
[02:18:59] ESPECIALLY FOR ADULTS 18 AND UP BUT
[02:19:00] EVERYONE IS WELCOME
[02:19:08] ATTEND.
[02:19:09] >> MADAM CLERK DO YOU WANT TO NAME OFF
[02:19:10] THE NEST COUPLE IF YOU
[02:19:12] HAVE ANY?
[02:19:13] >> THOSE ARE THE ONLY CARDS I HAVE.
[02:19:15] >> OKAY. THANK YOU.
[02:19:21] >> HI, GUYS. WE ARE HERE ON BEHALF OF
[02:19:22] LEADERSHIP HERMOSA
[02:19:26] BEACH AND WANTED TO GIVE UPDATE SAID. A
[02:19:27] FEW HAD BEEN AT IT
Page 21 of 94
[02:19:30] BEGINNING WHEN WE WERE GOING OVER THE
[02:19:31] PROCESS OF GETTING THE
[02:19:33] PROJECT CHOSEN AND THE ORIGINAL GOAL WE
[02:19:34] HAD SET AND SO WE ARE
[02:19:38] ON THE CITY LIAISON COMMITTEE. THIS IS
[02:19:39] TYLER AND WE WANTED TO
[02:19:45] GIVE A UPDATE OF THE PROJECT.
[02:19:47] >> THANK YOU, NICOLE. I'M TYLER
[02:19:48] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] PART OF
[02:19:52] LEADERSHIP HERMOSA 2019. WE ARE EXCITED
[02:19:53] BECAUSE WE ARE GOING
[02:19:58] TO PUT HERMOSA ON THE MAP WITH A WALKER
[02:19:59] TOUR OF THE CITY.
[02:20:04] USING THE ZZ TRAVEL APP WHICH ANYONE CAN
[02:20:05] DOWN LOAD ON THE
[02:20:10] PHONES. IT ISN'T A SET ROUTE YOU HAVE TO
[02:20:11] TAKE. WHAT IS NICE
[02:20:13] ABOUT IT IS RIGHT NOW IS WE COMPILE OVER
[02:20:14] 40 DIFFERENT
[02:20:17] CONTENTS, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, PREVIOUS
[02:20:18] EVENTS, MURALS,
[02:20:21] ARTIFACTS ALL THAT TYPE OF STUFF AND
[02:20:22] EACH ONE OF THOSE WILL
[02:20:25] HAVE PICTURES AND A WRITE-UP TO A
[02:20:26] PARAGRAPH LONG WITHIN THIS
[02:20:32] APP AND NOW WHEN YOU WALK THROUGH THE
[02:20:33] CITY AND YOU HAVE THIS
[02:20:35] APP DOWNLOADED YOU WILL GET A
[02:20:36] NOTIFICATION ABOUT A CERTAIN
[02:20:38] ITEM THAT MIGHT BE AROUND YOU THAT YOU
[02:20:39] NEVER NOTICED. THIS
[02:20:44] BUILDING MIGHT HAVE CHANGED OR THIS
[02:20:45] EVENT HAPPENED AT THAT
[02:20:47] SPOT SO REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THAT. WE
[02:20:48] ARE PROJECTED TO HAVE IT
[02:20:51] DONE AROUND MID-JUNE. WE ARE GOING TO
[02:20:52] HAVE A LAUNCH PARTY
[02:20:55] AROUND IT AT THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY. IT
[02:20:56] IS SOMETHING WE ARE
[02:21:00] REALLY POSITIVE ABOUT, REALLY EXCITED.
[02:21:01] OTHER CLASSES HAVE
[02:21:06] DONE DIFFERENT EVENTS AND THAT TYPE OF
[02:21:07] STUFF BUT THIS IS A
[02:21:11] TANGIBLE ITEM THAT IS LONG LASTING AND
[02:21:12] NO OTHER SOUTH BAY CITY
[02:21:15] HAS THIS RIGHT NOW. BUT IT IS SOMETHING
[02:21:16] YOU WILL BE ABLE
Page 22 of 94
[02:21:19] TO-PEOPLE CAN ADD TO IT DOWN THE ROAD
[02:21:20] WITH SMALL BUSINESSES
[02:21:23] WILL BE ABLE TO GET ON THERE AND OFFER
[02:21:24] CERTAIN DETAILS ON
[02:21:26] SPECIALS THEY ARE HAVING, THAT TYPE OF
[02:21:27] STUFF SO WE ARE REALLY
[02:21:30] EXCITED BET IT AND WANTED TO GIVE YOU A
[02:21:31] UPDATE AND KEEP YOU
[02:21:35] POSTED AS A GOES. THANK YOU.
[02:21:37] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALRIGHT. WE HAVE
[02:21:38] RUN OUT OF CARDS SO
[02:21:42] IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN THIS
[02:21:43] GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
[02:21:46] PORTION, PLEASE STEP UP TO THE
[02:21:47] MICROPHONE.
[02:22:04] >> MY NAME IS POLY SNIDER AND I HAVE
[02:22:05] BEEN LIVED IN HERMOSA 50
[02:22:09] YEARS AND MY SON STILL LIVES HERE AND
[02:22:10] GRANDSON STILL LIVES
[02:22:13] HERE SO WE LOVE HERMOSA. FIRST COUNCIL I
[02:22:14] WENT TO COMPLAIN
[02:22:20] ABOUT SOMETHING WAS A BUNCH OF PEOPLE
[02:22:21] WHO GOT TOGETHER, I
[02:22:24] DIDN'T KNOW THEM, THEY SAID PLEASE COME
[02:22:25] AND I SAID WHAT'S THE
[02:22:27] MATTER AND THEY SAID THEY ARE TRYING TO
[02:22:28] KEEP US FROM HAVING
[02:22:30] CHICKENS IN OUR BACKYARD. I DON'T
[02:22:31] REMEMBER WHAT THE DECISION
[02:22:34] WAS, BUT WE ALL THOUGHT THAT WAS PRETTY
[02:22:35] IMPORTANT, AND WHEN I
[02:22:39] MOVED TO HERMOSA BEACH WHEN MY FAMILY
[02:22:40] DID, 190 STOPPED AT THE
[02:22:45] HIGHWAY, IT WAS A DIRT ROAD ALL THE WAY,
[02:22:46] AND I CAN REMEMBER A
[02:22:50] LOT OF FIGHTS THAT WE HAD WITH THE CITY
[02:22:51] OVER THE YEARS AND I
[02:22:53] HAVE THEM ALL LISTED BUT I WILL NOT SAY
[02:22:54] THEM ALL. THIS IS
[02:22:57] PRETTY IMPORTANT TOO, AND I READ ALL THE
[02:22:58] COMMENTS THAT WERE
[02:23:01] ONLINE ABOUT IT, AND WHEN WE FIRST MOVED
[02:23:02] HERE WE COULD SEE THE
[02:23:06] RAILROAD TRACKS FROM OUR FRONT DOOR AND
[02:23:07] THAT'S WHAT IT WAS. I
[02:23:10] STILL CALL IT THE RAILROAD TRACKS, BUT
[02:23:11] THAT'S JUST WHAT OLD
Page 23 of 94
[02:23:13] PEOPLE DO. [LAUGHTER]
[02:23:17] THE KIDS USED TO WAVE AT THE TRAINS
[02:23:18] GOING BY, AND THEN WHEN IT
[02:23:22] WAS ABANDONED WE BOUGHT THOSE SPIKES
[02:23:23] THAT WENT INTO THE-AS A
[02:23:27] FUND RAISER TO MAKE IT INTO A GREEN BELT
[02:23:28] AND THERE WAS SOME I
[02:23:31] GUESS DEVELOPERS AROUND WHO WANTED TO
[02:23:32] DEVELOP THE WHOLE THING
[02:23:35] FOR HOMES AND FOR BUSINESSES, AND WE
[02:23:36] FOUGHT THE CITY FOUGHT,
[02:23:43] WE CAME TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND IT WAS
[02:23:44] VERY IMPORTANT EVEN
[02:23:46] MORE THEN CHICKENS IN THE BACKYARD AND
[02:23:47] FINALLY WE WON AND NOW
[02:23:53] THIS IS GOING TO REALLY DESTROY ONE
[02:23:54] WHOLE END OF THE GREEN
[02:23:57] BELT, AND I'M AGAINST IT. I'M NOT
[02:23:58] AGAINST THE PROJECT, I LOVE
[02:24:02] THE IDEA OF COURSE, I WANT TO FILTER THE
[02:24:03] WATER AND KEEP THE
[02:24:08] TRASH OUT OF IT, BUT I'M AGAINST THE
[02:24:09] LOCATIONS YOU HAVE
[02:24:11] CHOSEN. BOTH MY KIDS WENT TO SOUTH
[02:24:12] SCHOOL AND NOW WE ARE
[02:24:14] GOING TO DIG IT UP TO PUT THIS THING IN,
[02:24:15] IT ISN'T A SCHOOL
[02:24:18] ANYMORE, BUT IN MY HEAD IT IS. THANK
[02:24:19] YOU.
[02:24:22] >> THANKS FOR BEING HERE, POLY. ALRIGHT.
[02:24:23] ANYONE ELSE FOR
[02:24:31] PUBLIC COMMENT? YES?
[02:24:33] >> I'M NICK WELLS, I READ ON ONLINE
[02:24:34] DESCRIPTION OF THE
[02:24:42] INFILTRATION PROJECT. IT LOOKED LIKE IT
[02:24:43] WAS PRETTY OFFICIAL
[02:24:46] AND IN IT IT MENTIONED THAT SOMETIMES
[02:24:47] FOR 48 TO 72 HOURS THERE
[02:24:52] MIGHT BE STANDING WATER, BUT IT TAKES
[02:24:53] MOSQUITOS LONGER THEN
[02:24:56] THAT, SO THE MOSQUITO THING WASN'T A
[02:24:57] PROBLEM, BUT SINCE THIS
[02:25:01] IS ALL RUN OFF DIRTY WATER, ARE WE GOING
[02:25:02] TO HAVE A SMELLY LAKE
[02:25:08] OF WATER FOR 2 OR 3 DAYS JUST STANDING
[02:25:09] THERE? ON THE EAST
[02:25:15] CODE COAST THEY HAD THE WILD FLOOD IN
Page 24 of 94
[02:25:16] NEW JERSEY TO THE
[02:25:21] FINANCIAL DISTRICT OF MANHATTAN. NOBODY
[02:25:22] PREDICTED IT. IT
[02:25:25] EXCEEDED HUNDRED YEAR FLOOD, IT WAS LIKE
[02:25:26] A 250 YEAR FLOOD, SO
[02:25:32] IF SOMETHING HAPPENED LIKE THAT HERE IT
[02:25:33] WILL BE A REAL
[02:25:36] DISASTER AND DON'T KNOW IF IN THE
[02:25:37] DOCUMENTS OR IN THE PROPOSAL
[02:25:39] IS THERE SOME WAY THAT THE MONEY WILL
[02:25:40] COME FROM THESE OTHER
[02:25:44] TOWNS? WILL TORRANCE KICK IN A TON OF
[02:25:45] MONEY, WILL MANHATTAN
[02:25:50] BEACH RESCUE US IF THIS BECOMES A
[02:25:51] DISASTER? AND ALSO THE
[02:25:56] OTHER CONCERN I HAD-IT IS JUST A SHORT
[02:25:57] SUMMARY, THE ONGOING
[02:26:01] MAINTENANCE OF THIS THING, SINCE IT IS
[02:26:02] ON OUR I GUESS PROPERTY
[02:26:06] SO TO SPEAK, WILL THESE OTHER TOWNS JUST
[02:26:07] WASH THEIR HANDS OF
[02:26:10] IT AND SAY WELL, IT IS HERMOSA'S THING
[02:26:11] NOW AND THEN LIKE THE
[02:26:15] OIL DEAL A FEW YEARS AGO THEN WE HAVE A
[02:26:16] REAL FINANCIAL PROBLEM
[02:26:25] TRYING TO MAINTAIN THIS THING. YEAH,
[02:26:26] LIKE THAT'S THE BIG
[02:26:31] CONCERN I HAVE. WHO IS GOING TO PAY IN
[02:26:32] THE EVENT OF A
[02:26:35] DISASTER? WILL THIS BE A SMELLY LAKE FOR
[02:26:36] TWO OR THREE DAYS AT
[02:26:39] A TIME? BECAUSE IT SAYS IT WILL BE
[02:26:40] STANDING WATER. I THOUGHT
[02:26:43] IT WAS GOING TO BE UNDERGROUND BUT
[02:26:44] STANDING WATER FOR 2 OR 3
[02:26:47] DAYS, IT DOESN'T SOUND GOOD.
[02:26:51] >> THANK YOU. ANYONE THAT JUST WALKED IN
[02:26:52] THIS IS GENERAL
[02:26:55] PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. THE NEXT ITEM ON
[02:26:56] THE AGENDA IS THE
[02:27:01] INFILTRATION PROJECT. THERE WILL BE A
[02:27:02] STAFF REPORT AND
[02:27:04] ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
[02:27:05] ANYONE ELSE IN THE
[02:27:08] AUDIENCE HERE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT?
[02:27:11] >> DO I HAVE TO STATE MY NAME?
[02:27:13] >> IF YOU DON'T MIND.
Page 25 of 94
[02:27:14] >> MU KAYLA WEB, 7 O4 ROSECRANS AVENUE
[02:27:15] MANHATTAN BEACH. AS
[02:27:20] SOMEONE WHO LIVED IN MANHATTAN BEACH 15
[02:27:21] YEARS I SEE IT AS VERY
[02:27:25] IMPORTANT WE NOT ONLY RETAIN BUT
[02:27:26] MAINTAIN THE RESOURCES EARTH
[02:27:29] HAS GIVEN US IN THE FORM OF LEISURELY
[02:27:30] ACTIVITIES AND ONE
[02:27:33] INCLUDES THE GREEN BELT. IT IS A MAN
[02:27:34] MADE RESOURCE IT IS
[02:27:37] EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO MAINTAIN THE
[02:27:38] NATURAL PRESERVATIVE WE
[02:27:40] HAVE WITHIN OUR LOCAL COMMUNITY. SOMEONE
[02:27:41] WHO ENJOYS RUNNING
[02:27:44] ALONG THE GREEN BELT AND CUTTING CROSS
[02:27:45] TO GET TO FRIENDS
[02:27:48] HOUSES I SEE THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT AS
[02:27:49] IMPORTANT AND
[02:27:51] BENEFICIAL. THE LOCAL ECOSYSTEM SAID
[02:27:52] ABLE TO DEVELOP IN THE
[02:27:54] SYSTEM ARE IMPORTANT AND THE LOCAL
[02:27:55] COMMUNITY AND AS WELL AS
[02:27:58] THE ORGANIZATION PRESERVATIVES WE HAVE
[02:27:59] BEEN ABLE TO HAVE
[02:28:03] WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY ARE EXTREMELY
[02:28:04] IMPORTANT. THE OCEAN AS
[02:28:06] WELL AS THE GREEN BELT BOTH PROPOSE
[02:28:07] DANGEROUS ISSUES ON THE
[02:28:12] TOPIC OF POLITICAL CLIMATE IN THE U.S.
[02:28:13] AND AS WE SEE THE
[02:28:14] GROWING DIVIDE BETWEEN REPUBLICANS AND
[02:28:15] DEMOCRATS THE CITY OF
[02:28:19] HERMOSA AND MARTIN BEACH HAVE COME
[02:28:20] TOGETHER TO CREATE A
[02:28:24] ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE AREA FOR
[02:28:25] THOSE OF BOTH PARTIES
[02:28:28] BUT BEEN ABLE TO MEET IT THE DEMANDS OF
[02:28:29] BOTH. I BELIEVE WE
[02:28:37] WOULD BE ABLE TO PRESERVE OUR
[02:28:38] ENVIRONMENTAL [INAUDIBLE
[02:28:41] COMMENTS] ALSO CONTINUE TO CREATE A NEW
[02:28:42] AREA FOR GENERATIONS
[02:28:43] TO COME. BUT WITH THE LACK OF
[02:28:44] ENVIRONMENTAL SAFE PP GUARDS IN
[02:28:47] PLACE BY HERMOSA BEACH AND MANHATTAN
[02:28:48] BEACH REGARDING THE OCEAN
[02:28:53] SAFETY IT IS IMPORTANT TO IMPLEMENT THE
Page 26 of 94
[02:28:54] PROJECT. THE PROJECT
[02:28:56] WILL ALLOW FOR GENERATIONS TO COME TO
[02:28:57] HAVE A CLEAN BEACH THAT
[02:28:58] WE HAVE BEEN NOT ONLY INTERNATIONALLY
[02:28:59] RECOGNIZED FOR, BUT HAVE
[02:29:02] BEEN INTERNATIONALLY ACCLAIMED FOR OVER
[02:29:03] THE PAST 50 YEARS.
[02:29:05] MANHATTAN BEACH AND HERMOSA BEACH HAVE
[02:29:06] BEEN THE LEAD ERS IN
[02:29:10] THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITIES SAND
[02:29:11] DISTRIBUTION PROJECTS WHICH
[02:29:15] HELPED BEACHES ALL OVER HAWAII AND IN
[02:29:16] THE INTERNATIONAL
[02:29:19] COMMUNITY TO HAVE EQUAL ACCESS TO STAND
[02:29:20] WHICH SEEMS LIKE A
[02:29:23] SMALL ISSUE BUT IT IS IMPERATIVE
[02:29:24] INSURING THE CITIZENS HAVE A
[02:29:26] RIGHT TO THE PROPER BEACH. I HAVE A
[02:29:27] STRONG ADVOCATE FOR THE
[02:29:31] PROJECT BECAUSE IT ALLOWS CITIZENS TO
[02:29:32] HAVE SEQUEL ACCESS TO
[02:29:35] THE ENVIRONMENT AND PRESERVE THE
[02:29:36] ENVIRONMENT FOR SEVERAL
[02:29:39] GENERATIONS THAT WISH TO USE THE GREEN
[02:29:40] BELT TO CUT ACROSS THE
[02:29:43] FRIENDS HOUSES AND RUNNING AND OTHER
[02:29:44] ACTIVITIES. THE BEACH IS
[02:29:47] EXTREMELY IMPORTANT BUT NEED TO
[02:29:48] IMPLEMENT THIS TO ALLOW THE
[02:29:50] BEACH TO HAVE A GROWING HELPFUL REGION
[02:29:51] FOR GENERATIONS TO
[02:29:54] COME. THANK YOU.
[02:29:55] >> THANK YOU, MU KAYLA. ANYONE ELSE FOR
[02:29:56] PUBLIC COMMENT?
[02:30:01] ALRIGHT. SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE
[02:30:02] THIS PUBLIC COMMENT
[02:30:05] RIGHT NOW AND MADAM CLERK--
[02:30:12] >> MAY I GET A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND
[02:30:13] FILE ON THE WRITTEN
[02:30:17] COMMUNICATION?
[02:30:18] >> DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND
[02:30:19] FILE?
[02:30:21] >> SO MOVED.
[02:30:22] >> SECOND.
[02:30:23] >> ALRIGHT. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? ALL
[02:30:24] THOSE IN FAVOR?
[02:30:26] >> AYE.
Page 27 of 94
[02:30:27] >> ALRIGHT. MADAM CLERK.
[02:30:31] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THE CONSENT
[02:30:32] CALENDAR AND BEFORE
[02:30:38] ANYONE LETS US KNOW IF YOU LIKE TO PULL
[02:30:39] ANY ITEMS WE DO HAVE
[02:30:42] THREE SUPPLEMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
[02:30:43] ITEMS AND LET YOU KNOW
[02:30:47] ABOUT THEM RIGHT NOW.
[02:30:48] >> PLEASE.
[02:30:49] >> THANK YOU. FOR ITEM 2F WE HAVE A
[02:30:50] COMMENT FROM CLAUDIA
[02:30:54] BERMEN. 2M A LETTER FROM ANTHONY HIGGINS
[02:30:55] RECEIVED TODAY AND
[02:31:00] 2O A E COMMENT FROM DAVID GRIFFON
[02:31:01] RECEIVED YESTERDAY. THANK
[02:31:06] YOU.
[02:31:07] >> ALRIGHT. DO MY COLLEAGUES WANT TO
[02:31:08] PULL ANY ITEMS?
[02:31:14] >> THE VOTING BUTTON FROM APPROVAL OF
[02:31:15] THE AGENDA IS STUCK ON
[02:31:18] MY SCREEN SO IF THERE IS WAY TO CLEAR
[02:31:19] THAT THAT WOULD HELP.
[02:31:22] >> I'LL HELP YOU WITH THAT IN A SECOND.
[02:31:23] COUNCIL MEMBER
[02:31:26] FANGARY.
[02:31:27] >> I LIKE TO PULL 2J THE ACTION MINUTES
[02:31:28] OF PUBLIC WORKS. 2I
[02:31:34] CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. ITEM 2P THE NORTH
[02:31:35] SCHOOL
[02:31:41] RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT SUBCOMMITTEE AND
[02:31:42] MOU.
[02:31:46] >> J, I, P.
[02:31:49] >> YES.
[02:31:50] >> J, I, P.
[02:31:54] >> OKAY. ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANYTHING TO
[02:31:55] PULL FROM CONSENT? DO
[02:31:58] I HAVE A MOTION AND
[02:32:00] >> MOTION WE RECEIVE THE BALANCE.
[02:32:02] >> SECOND.
[02:32:03] >> ALL THOSE IN-
[02:32:05] >> MOTION TO APPROVE THE BALANCE.
[02:32:07] >> APPROVE THE BALANCE.
[02:32:08] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[02:32:11] >> AYE.
[02:32:14] >> ALRIGHT. MADAM CLERK.
[02:32:17] >> WE'LL COME BACK TO THOSE THEN?
[02:32:20] >> YES; PLEASE.
Page 28 of 94
[02:32:21] >> THANK YOU.
[02:32:27] >> NEXT IS OUR MUNICIPAL MATTER AND
[02:32:28] ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST
[02:32:37] KRISTY MORRIS IS HERE WITH A STAFF
[02:32:38] REPORT. THANK YOU. GOOD
[02:32:47] EVENING.
[02:32:49] >> WHILE SHE GETS SETTLED I CAN LET YOU
[02:32:50] KNOW ABOUT
[02:32:53] SUPPLEMENTALS.
[02:32:54] >> PLEASE DO.
[02:32:55] >> THANK YOU. WE RECEIVED 115E COMMENTS
[02:32:56] BETWEEN MARCH 22 AND
[02:33:02] TODAY. WE RECEIVED E-MAIL AND
[02:33:03] ATTACHMENTS FROM PETER TUCKER
[02:33:07] TODAY. LETTER FROM DAVID GRANTUM AND
[02:33:08] LETTER FROM REDONDO
[02:33:13] BEACH MAYOR BILL BRAND TODAY AS WELL.
[02:33:16] >> KRISTY, WHEN YOU ARE READY.
[02:33:18] >> GOOD EVENING MADAM MAYOR AND FELLOW
[02:33:19] COUNCIL MEMBERS. JUST
[02:33:22] BEAR WITH ME, I HAVE A REPORT TODAY, IT
[02:33:23] IS A VERBAL REPORT. I
[02:33:26] DON'T HAVE A PRESENTATION. BUT I DID
[02:33:27] WANT TO WALK THROUGH THE
[02:33:32] STEPS HOW WE ENDED UP WHERE WE ARE. BACK
[02:33:33] IN FEBRUARY 2013 THE
[02:33:37] PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR PRESENTED OPTIONS
[02:33:38] TO COUNCIL FOR
[02:33:40] COMPLYING WITH THE 2012 MUNICIPAL STORM
[02:33:41] SEWER SYSTEM PERMIT OR
[02:33:46] MS4 PERMIT. COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF TO
[02:33:47] PROCEED WITH THE
[02:33:50] ENHANCED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN
[02:33:51] OPTION TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL
[02:33:53] TIME TO COMPLETE THE PLANS AND COMPLY
[02:33:54] WITH THE WATER QUALITY
[02:33:57] STANDARD USING EFFORT BASE AND NUMERICAL
[02:33:58] LIMITS. OTHER
[02:34:06] BENEFITS OF ENTERING INTO ENHANCED WATER
[02:34:07] SHOULD MANAGEMENT
[02:34:11] PLAN WITH BEACH CITY COUNTER PART IS
[02:34:12] OTHER BENEFITS INCLUDING
[02:34:15] COST SHARING ON PROJECT AND ECONOMY OF
[02:34:16] SCALE. THE CITIES OF
[02:34:20] HERMOSA BEACH, TORRANCE, [INAUDIBLE
[02:34:21] COMMENTS] FORMED THE BEACH
[02:34:25] CITY WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GROUP APPROVED
Page 29 of 94
[02:34:26] BY THE REGIONAL BOARD
[02:34:31] IN 2016. FOLLOWING THE REGIONAL BOARD
[02:34:32] APPROVAL OF THE
[02:34:35] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] THE CITY IN
[02:34:36] PARTNERSHIP WITH THE BEACH
[02:34:37] CITIES WATER SHOULD MANAGEMENT GROUP
[02:34:38] SUBMITTED GRANT
[02:34:42] APPLICATION TO THE STATE BOARD FOR
[02:34:43] DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF
[02:34:45] THE GREEN BELT INFILTRATION PROJECT. THE
[02:34:46] HIGHEST PRIORITY
[02:34:49] PROJECT BECAUSE IT WOULD ACHIEVE THE
[02:34:50] GREATEST REDUCTION IN
[02:34:53] BACTERIA AT THE DRAIN OUT-FALL.
[02:34:54] REGARDING THE SELECTION OF
[02:34:58] THE LOCATION FOR THE PROJECT IN THE
[02:34:59] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] AS WE
[02:35:02] HEARD AT THE JUNE AND OCTOBER MEETINGS,
[02:35:03] THERE WAS A MODELING
[02:35:07] TOOL THAT WAS INVOLVED AND IT WAS BASED
[02:35:08] ON A NUMBER OF
[02:35:14] ELEMENTS. SOILS WEST OF PACIFIC COAST
[02:35:15] HIGHWAY, THE SUITABLE
[02:35:21] INFILTRATING WATER QUICKLY. SUFFICIENT
[02:35:22] DEPTH FROM THE GROUND
[02:35:29] SURFACE TO WATER TABLE AND IN TERMS OF
[02:35:30] THE MODELING TOOL ONCE
[02:35:34] WE FOUND SITES PUBLICLY OWNED AND
[02:35:35] AVAILABLE IT WEIGHTED SITES
[02:35:39] WITH PARCEL SIZE OF.1 ACRES AND 500
[02:35:40] DISTANCE FROM THE STORM
[02:35:44] DRAIN. THE PROP 1 GRANT AMOUNT IS $3.1
[02:35:45] MILLION AND REPRESENTS
[02:35:52] HALF OF THE ESTIMATED COST. THE BALANCE
[02:35:53] OF THE PROJECT COST
[02:35:56] MUST BE PROVIDED AS MATCHING FUNDS BY
[02:35:57] THE MEMBERS OF THE BEACH
[02:35:59] CITY WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GROUP. THE
[02:36:00] CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
[02:36:03] SHARE OF THE DESIGN COST IS $115
[02:36:04] THOUSAND OR 13.6 PERCENT AND
[02:36:08] THIS IS BASED ON THE WATERSHED AREA
[02:36:09] CONTRIBUTING TO THE DRAIN
[02:36:12] AND THE CURRENT ESTIMATE FOR THE
[02:36:13] CONSTRUCTION COST FOR THE
[02:36:15] CITY IS $460 THOUSAND. FOR HERMOSA BEACH
[02:36:16] THE TOTAL BUDGET IS
Page 30 of 94
[02:36:21] APPROXIMATELY $580 THOUSAND. IN
[02:36:22] ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCOPE OF
[02:36:26] WORK AND SCHEDULE TETRA TECH COMMENCED
[02:36:27] SITE SURVEYS AND
[02:36:31] DEVELOPED DESIGNS PRESENTED AT THE
[02:36:32] COMMUNITY WORKSHOP HELD
[02:36:36] MARCH 2019, 20 [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS]
[02:36:37] SPECIAL STUDY SESSION JUNE
[02:36:44] 19. BASED ON THE FEEDBACK AND CONCERN
[02:36:45] STAFF PROVIDED ANALYSIS
[02:36:51] OF PROJECT SITES IN HERMOSA BEACH AT THE
[02:36:52] OCTOBER 9 CITY
[02:36:55] COUNCIL MEETING. THESE LOCATIONS
[02:36:56] INCLUDED THE GREEN BELT,
[02:36:59] NORTH OF SECOND STREET, THE TURF FIELD
[02:37:00] UNDER SOUTH PARK ON
[02:37:03] VALLEY DRIVE AND HERONDO STREET. IT WAS
[02:37:04] SUBSEQUENT LY
[02:37:09] DETERMINED THE HERONDO DRIVE PROJECT
[02:37:10] SITE WAS PARTIALLY
[02:37:12] LOCATED IN THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH SO
[02:37:13] WITH THE OUTCOME OF
[02:37:19] THE MEETING BEING FOR MAYOR [INAUDIBLE
[02:37:20] COMMENTS] TO IF GAUGE
[02:37:26] REDONDO BEACH OR TORRANCE TO DISCUSS
[02:37:27] RELOCATING OUTSIDE
[02:37:32] HERMOSA BEACH OR DIVIDING INTO SMALLER
[02:37:33] PROJECT THAT MIGHT HAVE
[02:37:37] BEEN A POSSIBLE LOCATION AT THE TIME.
[02:37:38] COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEES
[02:37:40] OF HER MOSEY AND REDONDO BEACH MET MARCH
[02:37:41] 5 AND DISCUSSED
[02:37:47] POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVE PROJECT SITES.
[02:37:48] DESPITE DISCUSSION THERE
[02:37:51] WAS NO CONSENSUS ON PURSUING A SITE IN
[02:37:52] REDONDO BEACH. ON
[02:38:00] FEBRUARY 4, 2019 CITY STAFF MET WITH
[02:38:01] REDONDO BEACH, MANHATTAN
[02:38:05] BEACH AND TORRANCE STAFF TO DISCUSS HOW
[02:38:06] TO PROCEED WITH THE
[02:38:08] PROJECT UNDER THE CURRENT MOU FOR DESIGN
[02:38:09] TO RETAIN THE PROP 1
[02:38:13] GRANT FUNDING. STAFF EXPRESSED IF THE
[02:38:14] ORIGINAL MOU CANNOT BE
[02:38:19] EXECUTED THEY WOULD LIKE HERMOSA BEACH
[02:38:20] COUNCIL TO SEND A
[02:38:23] LETTER TO THE RESPECTIVE CITY COUNCILS
Page 31 of 94
[02:38:24] ASKING THE COUNTER
[02:38:29] PARTS TO-DURING THE TIME THE STATE BOARD
[02:38:30] OF DIVISION OF
[02:38:34] FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE ALSO NOTIFIED THE
[02:38:35] CITY WE ARE IN BREACH
[02:38:37] OF THE GRANT AGREEMENT DUE TO
[02:38:38] OUTSTANDING ITEMS AND LIMITED
[02:38:41] PROGRESS ON THE PROJECT. ALL THE
[02:38:42] REQUESTED ITEMS HAVE BEEN
[02:38:44] SUBMITTED THE CITY IS IN BEACH OF
[02:38:45] AGREEMENT UNTIL A SITE IS
[02:38:51] IDENTIFIED. THE CITY IS PROVIDED THE
[02:38:52] OPPORTUNITY BY THE STATE
[02:38:54] BOARD TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS AND SUBMIT
[02:38:55] PROJECT PLANS OR
[02:38:57] IDENTIFY A SITE IN OTHER FORMS OF
[02:38:58] INFORMATION TO ALLOW THE
[02:39:02] STATE BOARD TO CONSIDER SUBSTITUTION OF
[02:39:03] THE PROJECT BY APRIL
[02:39:05] 1. AN ALTERNATIVE PROJECT NEEDS TO MEET
[02:39:06] THE PROP 1 GRANT
[02:39:11] AGREEMENT REQUIREMENTS DEMONSTRATING
[02:39:12] SIMILAR WATER QUALITY
[02:39:15] BENEFIT TO THE GREEN BELT PROJECT AND
[02:39:16] APPROVED BY BOTH THE
[02:39:19] STATE BOARD AND REGIONAL BOARD THROUGH
[02:39:20] AN AMENDMENT TO OUR
[02:39:23] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] ALTERNATIVELY CITY
[02:39:24] COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE TO
[02:39:28] ABANDON A PROJECT BY AMENDMENT OR
[02:39:29] DISSOLUTION OF THE MOU AND
[02:39:33] RELINQUISH THE GRANT FUNDING. THE CITY
[02:39:34] NEEDS TO PROVIDE
[02:39:40] NOTICE TO THE REGIONAL BOARD TERMINATING
[02:39:41] THE MOU AND STAFF
[02:39:43] NEEDS TO MEET WITH THE BOARD TO
[02:39:44] DETERMINE HOW TO VIEW SUCH
[02:39:46] TERMINATION AND WHAT OUR ALTERNATIVE
[02:39:47] REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE TO
[02:39:51] STAY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE [INAUDIBLE
[02:39:52] COMMENTS] SO THEREFORE,
[02:39:55] STAFF RECOMMENDS CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER
[02:39:56] AND PROVIDE DIRECTION
[02:39:58] ON THE FOLLOWING THREE OPTIONS TO
[02:39:59] ADDRESS THE REQUIREMENTS OF
[02:40:01] THE GRANT AGREEMENT AND COST SHARING MOU
[02:40:02] FOR THE PROJECT. THE
Page 32 of 94
[02:40:06] FIRST OPTION IS PROCEED WITH PROJECT AT
[02:40:07] THE EXISTING GREEN
[02:40:09] BELT LOCATION. OR TWO, PROCEED WITH THE
[02:40:10] PROJECT AT A
[02:40:13] ALTERNATIVE LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY
[02:40:14] JURISDICTION OR THREE,
[02:40:20] INITIATE DISSOLUTION OR AMENDMENT OF THE
[02:40:21] MOU AND NEGOTIATE A
[02:40:25] SUITABLE SUBSTITUTE OR REVISED MOU AND
[02:40:26] PROJECT WITH THE CITY
[02:40:30] PARTNERS AND RELINQUISH THE GRANT AND
[02:40:31] FORFEIT THE GRANT
[02:40:34] FUNDING AND THAT CONCLUDES THE STAFF
[02:40:35] REPORT THIS EVENING.
[02:40:37] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. KRISTY, DO MY
[02:40:38] COLLEAGUES HAVE
[02:40:43] QUESTIONS? COUNCIL MEMBER MASSEY.
[02:40:46] >> JUST A CLARIFYING QUESTION TO THE
[02:40:47] PUBLIC COMMENT SAID WE
[02:40:49] HEARD. THERE IS A COST SHARING
[02:40:50] ARRANGEMENT. IS THERE COST
[02:40:58] SHARING WITH OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
[02:40:59] COST?
[02:41:00] >> TWO THINGS, WE CAN COST SHARE ON THE
[02:41:01] OPERATIONAL
[02:41:02] MAINTENANCE COST OR WITH THE PASSING OF
[02:41:03] MEASURE W LOS ANGELES
[02:41:07] COUNTY WILL UPON REQUEST CONSIDER TAKING
[02:41:08] OVER THE OPERATION
[02:41:11] AND MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR REGIONAL
[02:41:12] PROJECTS SO THAT IN THAT
[02:41:17] SCENARIO WE WOULDN'T NEED TO BE PAYING
[02:41:18] FOR THE OPERATION AND
[02:41:20] MAINTENANCE.
[02:41:21] >> THANK YOU, KRISTY.
[02:41:22] >> COUNCIL MEMBER DUCLOS.
[02:41:25] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. I THINK YOU
[02:41:26] STARTED BY TALKING
[02:41:29] ABOUT THE 2016 AGREEMENT, BUT THE
[02:41:30] FORMATION OF THIS WATERSHED
[02:41:35] GROUP WAS AROUND 2013 AND THE DISCUSSION
[02:41:36] ABOUT THE FORMATION
[02:41:41] PRECEDED THAT PROBABLY A COUPLE YEARS IN
[02:41:42] THE MAKING. IT WOULD
[02:41:46] BE HELPFUL TO KNOW BECAUSE I CAN GIVE
[02:41:47] YOU MY RECOLLECTION OF
[02:41:55] HOW THAT WAS VIEWED BY THE COUNCIL AT
Page 33 of 94
[02:41:56] THAT TIME. PLEASE
[02:42:00] CORRECT ME AND YOU OR THE CITY ATTORNEY
[02:42:01] IF I'M WRONG. THIS
[02:42:06] WAS PERCEIVED AS A MAJOR VICTORY FOR THE
[02:42:07] CITY AS A SMALL CITY
[02:42:14] WITH LIMITED FUNDS AND VERY LIMITED
[02:42:15] FUNDS BACK THEN IN 2010,
[02:42:19] 11, 12. WE HAD A MANDATE FROM THE
[02:42:20] REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
[02:42:23] CONTROL BOARD TO MITIGATE A PROBLEM THAT
[02:42:24] WAS OUR PROBLEM, AND
[02:42:30] UNLIKE OUR NEIGHBORING CITIES, WE DIDN'T
[02:42:31] HAVE THE RESOURCES TO
[02:42:35] DO THAT AND THERE WAS REALLY-THE
[02:42:36] ONLY-THE SAVING GRACE OF THIS
[02:42:43] FACT WAS THAT WE WERE ABLE TO JOIN WITH
[02:42:44] THESE OTHER CITIES AND
[02:42:48] TO SPREAD THE COST OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF
[02:42:49] A PROJECT AND THAT'S
[02:42:54] REALLY IN MY RECOLLECTION EXACTLY HOW
[02:42:55] THIS STARTED. IT ALWAYS
[02:42:59] STARTED BASED ON A MANDATE AND
[02:43:00] REQUIREMENT FOR THE CITY OR
[02:43:03] HERMOSA BEACH BECAUSE WE ARE THE OUTFALL
[02:43:04] POINT FOR THE HERONDO
[02:43:09] DRAIN TO MITIGATE WHICH WAS THEN AND
[02:43:10] CONTINUES TO BE ONE OF
[02:43:12] THE MOST POLLUTED AREAS IN THE SOUTH
[02:43:13] BAY. THAT'S MY
[02:43:18] RECOLLECTION. IF I-DOES THAT SOUND
[02:43:19] CORRECT, MIKE IF YOU HAVE
[02:43:23] THOUGHTS ON THAT?
[02:43:24] >> SOUNDS CORRECT.
[02:43:25] >> AND CAN'T REMEMBER-I MAY HAVE MORE
[02:43:26] LATER, BUT THAT WAS-I
[02:43:32] THINK IT IS A IMPORTANT PART OF THIS
[02:43:33] EQUATION IN TERMS OF WHY
[02:43:37] WE STARTED DOWN THIS ROAD AND WHY WE
[02:43:38] PARTNERED WITH THEM AND
[02:43:40] WHAT I DON'T FEEL IS EXPRESSED HERE
[02:43:41] APPROPRIATELY IS THE FACT
[02:43:46] THAT THERE IS A COST SHARING ELEMENT
[02:43:47] HERE IN TERMS OF WHAT WE
[02:43:54] ARE-HOW WE ARE APPROACHING THIS NOW AND
[02:43:55] WHAT HAPPENS SHOULD WE
[02:44:01] DISSOLVE THAT RELATIONSHIP AND WE OPT TO
[02:44:02] GO ON OUR OWN. IT
Page 34 of 94
[02:44:08] WOULD BE HELPFUL TO HAVE A SENSE WHAT IS
[02:44:09] THAT LOOK LIKE AS
[02:44:12] WELL AS IN TERMS OF COST FOR THE CITY
[02:44:13] AND CONSEQUENCES BECAUSE
[02:44:17] WE WOULD BE IN BREACH NOT JUST OF AN
[02:44:18] AGREEMENT BUT WE ARE IN
[02:44:22] BREACH OF PROJECTED MILESTONES WE AGREED
[02:44:23] TO IN TERMS OF
[02:44:26] DEALING OUR PROBLEM. CAN YOU GIVE ME A
[02:44:27] SENSE OF THAT BECAUSE
[02:44:34] WE HAVEN'T TALKED ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES
[02:44:35] OF TAKING AN ACTION
[02:44:38] TO BASICALLY DISSOLVING THE RELATIONSHIP
[02:44:39] AND GOING ON THIS ON
[02:44:43] OUR OWN. ALSO WHAT ISN'T DISCUSSED OR
[02:44:44] MENTIONED HERE IS THE
[02:44:47] CONCEPT OF DOING NOTHING. WHAT DOES THAT
[02:44:48] MEAN FOR THE CITY?
[02:44:54] >> SO, WE HAVE KATHLEEN MCGOWEN HERE WHO
[02:44:55] CAN TALK TO WHAT OUR
[02:45:03] OPTIONS ARE IN TERMS OF IF WE HAD TO
[02:45:04] WALK THIS BACK AND
[02:45:07] DISSOLVE THE MOU. I KNOW THAT OUR CITY
[02:45:08] ATTORNEY HAS SOME
[02:45:12] OPINIONS ON WHAT THE LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS
[02:45:13] AND COST
[02:45:18] RAMIFICATIONS ARE. I CAN TELL YOU THAT
[02:45:19] TO THE COST FOR US TO
[02:45:23] HAVE TO BUILD OUR OWN PROJECTS ISN'T
[02:45:24] SCALABLE, SO I DO KNOW
[02:45:28] THAT WE PROBABLY WOULD NEED A LARGE-IT'S
[02:45:29] NOT SCALABLE, SO EVEN
[02:45:34] THOUGH WE REDUCE THE SIZE OF THE
[02:45:35] PROJECT, THE COST OF THE
[02:45:38] PROJECT WOULDN'T DECREASE
[02:45:39] PROPORTIONATELY. WE STILL NEED
[02:45:41] LARGE PROJECTS IN THE CITY. SO, TO
[02:45:42] CAPTURE JUST OUR WATERSHED
[02:45:46] AREA WHICH IS 283 ACRES THAT DRAIN TO
[02:45:47] THE PROPOSED PROJECT, IT
[02:45:51] STILL COST US IN THE MAGNITUDE OF $6
[02:45:52] MILLION TO BUILD THAT
[02:45:56] PROJECT AT A SMALLER SCALE. THAT'S THE
[02:45:57] COST SIDE OF THINGS.
[02:46:01] I KNOW THE CITY ATTORNEY CAN TALK TO THE
[02:46:02] LEGAL IMPLICATION.
[02:46:10] >> JUST WITH REFERENCE TO YOUR QUESTION
Page 35 of 94
[02:46:11] ABOUT THE DOING
[02:46:14] NOTHING OPTION, THAT'S NOT A OPTION. AND
[02:46:15] THAT'S NOT A OPTION
[02:46:18] BECAUSE IF WE DO NOTHING THEN WE
[02:46:19] ULTIMATELY BECOME SUBJECT TO
[02:46:22] NUMERICAL REQUIREMENTS WHICH ARE NOT
[02:46:23] ACHIEVABLE. IN WHICH
[02:46:31] EVENT WE SUBJECT TO CATASTROPHIC FINES
[02:46:32] AND POTENTIAL
[02:46:36] LITIGATION SO DOING NOTHING AND NOT
[02:46:37] MEETING THE NUMERICAL
[02:46:42] REQUIREMENTS IN THE RECEIVING WATER IS
[02:46:43] SIMPLY NOT A OPTION FOR
[02:46:44] THE CITY. IT IS IMPRUDENT PLANNING TO
[02:46:45] SIMPLY DO NOTHING.
[02:46:50] >> WHEN YOU SUGGEST LEGAL ACTIONS
[02:46:51] BETWEEN-THERE IS POTENTIALLY
[02:46:55] MULTIPLE AGENCIES?
[02:46:56] >> THERE IS THE BOARD, THE REGIONAL
[02:46:57] BOARD.
[02:47:01] >> ALSO IN VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN WATER
[02:47:02] ACT.
[02:47:04] >> THIRD PARTY LITIGATION BY GROUPS THAT
[02:47:05] ADVOCATE FOR CLEAN
[02:47:12] WATER AND THAT INCREASE THE POTENTIAL
[02:47:13] FOR FINES UP TO $37
[02:47:15] THOUSAND PER DAY. HAVING A PHYSICAL
[02:47:16] INFRASTRUCTURE ISN'T A
[02:47:26] VIABLE ALTERNATIVE. THERE MUST BE
[02:47:27] PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND
[02:47:30] SO AS I SEE IT, YOU HAVE ANOTHER THE
[02:47:31] CURRENT PATH WHICH IS
[02:47:42] GREEN BELT PATH, YOU HAVE THE SECOND
[02:47:43] PATH, WHICH IS FIND
[02:47:46] ANOTHER LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY THAT
[02:47:47] WILL ACCOMMODATE A
[02:47:52] SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR FACILITY. AND
[02:47:53] ACCOMPLISH THE GOAL OF
[02:47:57] THE EXISTING MOU WHICH IS THE SOUTH PARK
[02:47:58] SIDE OR THIRD PATH
[02:48:05] WHICH IS A UNCERTAIN PATH. UNCERTAIN
[02:48:06] PATH COULD INVOLVE
[02:48:16] RENEGOTIATION OF THE MOU OR REVISION OR
[02:48:17] NEW MOU DEPENDENT ON
[02:48:20] THE WILLINGNESS OF THE PARTNERS, IT
[02:48:21] INVOLVES SUBSTANTIAL
[02:48:25] NEGOTIATION WITH THE REGIONAL BOARD. CAN
Page 36 of 94
[02:48:26] COULD INVOLVE
[02:48:30] NEGOTIATIONS OVER THE [INAUDIBLE
[02:48:31] COMMENTS] EACH PARTIES GOING
[02:48:33] IT ALONE. IT WILL INVOLVE INFRASTRUCTURE
[02:48:34] BUT AS KRISTY SAID,
[02:48:40] THE COST OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS NOT
[02:48:41] SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT.
[02:48:47] THE POSSIBILITY OF GETTING A NEW
[02:48:48] GRANT-WE WILL LOSE THE
[02:48:52] EXISTING GRANT FOR SURE. WHETHER WE GET
[02:48:53] A NEW GRANT OR NOT IS
[02:48:56] UNCLEAR. WHETHER WE CAN FIND A LOCATION
[02:48:57] FOR OTHER PROJECTS
[02:49:04] SMALLER PROJECTS AND I DON'T KNOW HOW
[02:49:05] MUCH SMALLER THEY COULD
[02:49:08] BE AND DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS LOCATIONS
[02:49:09] EITHER A, AVAILABLE OR
[02:49:12] B, NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME SORT OF
[02:49:13] OPPOSITION THAT WE HAVE
[02:49:15] SEEN FROM THE EXISTING PROJECT IS A
[02:49:16] QUESTION. SO THAT THIRD
[02:49:20] PATH IS A VERY UNCERTAIN PATH. IT IS
[02:49:21] FRAUGHT WITH OBSTACLES
[02:49:25] AND IT'S VERY UNPREDICTABLE, VERY
[02:49:26] DIFFICULT TO SAY WHAT THE
[02:49:30] END WOULD LOOK LIKE KEEPING IN MIND THAT
[02:49:31] WE HAVE A DEADLINE
[02:49:35] AND THAT WE ARE ON A PRETTY TIGHT
[02:49:36] DEADLINE AS IT IS. IF WE
[02:49:41] END UP HAVING TO GO INTO MONTHS AND
[02:49:42] MONTHS OF NEGOTIATION WITH
[02:49:45] OUR PARTNERS TO HAVE A NEW MOU, TO
[02:49:46] CONSIDER WHETHER THEY WOULD
[02:49:49] PUT PROJECTS IN THEIR CITIES OR WHETHER
[02:49:50] WE HAVE MULTIPLE
[02:49:54] PROJECTS THIS WILL TAKE A SUBSTANTIAL
[02:49:55] AMOUNT OF TIME. LOOK
[02:49:58] HOW LONG IT HAS BEEN FROM WHEN WE
[02:49:59] STARTED THIS TO NOW AND WE
[02:50:04] ARE EXPECTED TO HAVE A COMPLETE PROJECT
[02:50:05] IN A VERY SHORT AMOUNT
[02:50:10] OF TIME. AND SO THAT'S JUST MY
[02:50:11] PERSPECTIVE ON THE DIFFICULT
[02:50:18] CHOICE THE COUNCIL FACES TONIGHT. WE
[02:50:19] WILL LOSE THE GRANT IF
[02:50:24] WE DONT TELL THE BOARD ON APRIL 1 OR
[02:50:25] BEFORE APRIL 1 THAT WE
Page 37 of 94
[02:50:28] HAVE A PROJECT SITE. THAT'S ABSOLUTE
[02:50:29] GIVEN. I DO NOT BELIEVE
[02:50:34] WE WILL HAVE A OPPORTUNITY TO GET AN
[02:50:35] EXTENSION OF THE
[02:50:38] DEADLINE. ONCE WE LOSE THE GRANT THEN WE
[02:50:39] ARE FACED WITH THIS
[02:50:43] UNCERTAIN FUTURE. THAT CONCLUDES MY
[02:50:44] COMMENTS.
[02:50:48] >> THANK YOU.
[02:50:52] >> TO MY COLLEAGUES OVER HERE. MAYOR PRO
[02:50:53] TEM.
[02:50:58] >> THANK YOU. CAN I CLARIFY YOU AND
[02:50:59] COUNCIL MEMBER FANGARY
[02:51:04] WHO WERE OUR SUBCOMMITTEE TO INTERACT
[02:51:05] WITH REDONDO BEACH AND
[02:51:12] WHATEVER EXTENT TO THE PARTNER CITIES
[02:51:13] YOU WILL GIVE US A
[02:51:16] DOWNLOAD OF THE PROGRESS OR NOT OF THE
[02:51:17] CONVERSATIONS AT SOME
[02:51:20] POINT THIS EVENING SO THAT WILL PERMIT
[02:51:21] ME ASKING A COUPLE OF
[02:51:23] THE QUESTIONS NOW. SHOULD I JUST WAIT TO
[02:51:24] DELIBERATION?
[02:51:27] >> YOU CAN ASK THOSE QUESTIONS NOW.
[02:51:28] WE'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER
[02:51:31] THEM.
[02:51:32] >> OKAY, IN TERMS OF CLARIFYING
[02:51:33] QUESTIONS ON THE REPORT KRISTY
[02:51:38] HAS GIBBON THE FIRST QUESTION IS ABOUT
[02:51:39] THE EXTENDED TIMELINE
[02:51:42] TO APRIL 1. SO, I KIND OF TWO RELATED
[02:51:43] QUESTIONS. ONE IS, IF
[02:51:50] IT CAN BE DESCRIBED FOR EVERYONE HERE,
[02:51:51] WHAT WOULD THAT LOOK
[02:51:55] LIKE AFTER TONIGHT? THE STEPS AND THE
[02:51:56] PROCESS IF WE DID NOT
[02:52:00] GO FORWARD WITH THE ORIGINAL IDENTIFIED
[02:52:01] PROJECT, WHICH IS THE
[02:52:04] GREEN BELT PROJECT? SO, THAT IS SUCH A
[02:52:05] SHORT WINDOW. LET'S
[02:52:08] JUST USE AN EXAMPLE AND SAY WE PIVOTED
[02:52:09] AND GAVE DIRECTION TO
[02:52:13] PURSUE SOUTH PARK AS A ALTERNATIVE. WHAT
[02:52:14] WOULD BE THE STEPS
[02:52:19] TO APRIL 1 BECAUSE THERE IS SOMETHING IN
[02:52:20] THE LANGUAGE THAT
[02:52:23] SAYS WE HAVE TO PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE
Page 38 of 94
[02:52:24] PLANS IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL
[02:52:31] IN ORDER TO POTENTIALLY SAVE THE MOU, IS
[02:52:32] THAT ACCURATE? I SAY
[02:52:37] POTENTIALLY.
[02:52:39] >> YES, SO WHAT THEY NEED FROM THE CITY
[02:52:40] COUNCIL IS SOME
[02:52:43] ASSURANCE OR DIRECTION ON A SITE AND
[02:52:44] THAT EVERYONE IS TOGETHER
[02:52:48] OEN THE SITE OR AT LEAST THE MAJORITY OF
[02:52:49] COUNCIL IS TOGETHER
[02:52:52] ON SELECTING THAT SITE. FOR THE
[02:52:53] ALTERNATIVE SITES WE DO HAVE
[02:52:56] THOSE VERY BASIC PRELIMINARY DESIGNS
[02:52:57] THAT WE SHARED WITH YOU
[02:53:00] AT THE OCTOBER 9 MEETING SO THAT WOULD
[02:53:01] BE SUFFICIENT FOR THEM
[02:53:05] TO SEE THE FOOTPRINT AND IT COULD FIT AT
[02:53:06] A PARTICULAR
[02:53:09] LOCATION. SO THAT'S WHAT THEY NEED,
[02:53:10] CERTAINTY BECAUSE AT THE
[02:53:13] MOMENT THEY HAVE $3 MILLIONS IN THE
[02:53:14] PROJECT THAT THEY ARE
[02:53:19] ANXIOUS TO RELEASE AND SHARE WITH OTHER
[02:53:20] PROJECTS IF WE CANT
[02:53:25] MOVE FORWARD.
[02:53:26] >> OKAY. AND TO CITY ATTORNEY'S COMMENTS
[02:53:27] A MOMENT AGO, IN
[02:53:32] THAT SCENARIO, IF WHAT WE HAVE CURRENTLY
[02:53:33] ON A ALTERNATIVE SITE
[02:53:39] IS SUFFICIENT WOULD WE EXPECT THAT THAT
[02:53:40] GRANT WOULD NOT BE
[02:53:42] CANCELED ON APRIL 1 OR DO WE EVEN KNOW
[02:53:43] THAT FOR SURE? IF THEY
[02:53:49] LIKED THE ALTERNATIVE?
[02:53:50] >> SO, IT IS BASED ON A RECOMMENDATION.
[02:53:51] SO, THEY CAME AND DID
[02:53:55] A SITE TOUR INITIALLY WHEN THEY WERE
[02:53:56] DOING THE PRE-GRANT
[02:54:02] INSPECTION OF THE SITES SO THEY DID LOOK
[02:54:03] AT THE SITE AND AREAS
[02:54:08] AROUND THE SITE. AS I SAID IN THE
[02:54:09] REPORT, WE HAVE SPOKEN WITH
[02:54:11] THE GRANT MANAGER. IF HERMOSA BEACH CAN
[02:54:12] IDENTIFY A LOCATION
[02:54:15] TO CAPTURE THE SAME VOLUME OF WATER IN
[02:54:16] THE CURRENT GRANT
[02:54:18] AGREEMENT, AND THERE IS ALSO VEGETATION
Page 39 of 94
[02:54:19] PLANTING REQUIRED UP
[02:54:24] TO 1 ACRE THEY WOULD BE HAPPY WITH THAT
[02:54:25] DIRECTION.
[02:54:29] >> OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THAT ADDITIONAL
[02:54:30] INFORMATION. I WONDER
[02:54:35] IF WE HAVE ANY INFORMATION ON THE MONEY
[02:54:36] THAT IS BEING MADE
[02:54:39] AVAILABLE FOR GRANT FUNDING OF THESE
[02:54:40] KINDS OF PROJECTS IN THE
[02:54:43] STATE, BECAUSE WE UNDERSTAND THAT IF WE
[02:54:44] WERE TO LOSE THE
[02:54:48] CURRENT AWARD THERE IS A POSSIBILITY WE
[02:54:49] COULD COME BACK AT A
[02:54:53] LATER TIME WITH A DIFFERENT PROJECT AND
[02:54:54] REAPPLY FOR GRANT
[02:54:57] FUNDING IN A "SECOND ROUND" POTENTIALLY.
[02:54:58] DO WE HAVE DETAILS
[02:55:05] ABOUT THE LIMIT OF THOSE FUNDS AND
[02:55:06] WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE
[02:55:09] LIKELY TO RUN OUT IN A FIRST ROUND OR IS
[02:55:10] THAT NOT CLEAR? IS
[02:55:15] THERE A POT OF MONEY AND THEN WHEN IT IS
[02:55:16] GONE IT IS GONE?
[02:55:19] >> IT IS [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] FUNDS. IT
[02:55:20] IS LIMITED SO IN THE
[02:55:24] FIRST ROUND THEY DID FUND A LARGE NUMBER
[02:55:25] OF PROJECTS BUT LIKE
[02:55:29] I SAID, THERE ARE OTHER PROJECTS THEY
[02:55:30] WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE
[02:55:32] FUNDED. WE HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF
[02:55:33] THAT FUNDING WRAPPED
[02:55:37] UP AT THE MOMENT ON A PROJECT THAT IF WE
[02:55:38] ARE NOT GOING TO MOVE
[02:55:42] FORWARD THEY LIKE TO DISSOLVE THE
[02:55:43] AGREEMENT SO THEY CAN
[02:55:47] RELEASE THE FUNDS TO OTHER PROJECTS SO
[02:55:48] IT ISN'T A ENDLESS POT
[02:55:51] OF FUNDING, IT IS COMPETITIVE FUNDING.
[02:55:52] WE CAN'T GUARANTEE IF
[02:55:55] WE APPLY FOR THE FUNDING AGAIN WE ARE
[02:55:56] COMPETITIVE BASED ON HOW
[02:55:58] WE PERFORMED UNDER THE CURRENT GRANT
[02:55:59] AGREEMENT, SO THAT'S JUST
[02:56:03] ONE CONSIDERATION. THERE ARE OTHER
[02:56:04] GRANTS PROJECTS THAT COME
[02:56:07] UP, BUT NOT OUT OF THE PROP 1 FUNDING.
[02:56:11] >> OKAY, THANK YOU MADAM MAYOR. I THINK
Page 40 of 94
[02:56:12] I'LL STOP THERE.
[02:56:16] >> ALRIGHT. ALRIGHT. I HAVE ONE
[02:56:17] QUESTION. WE RECEIVED A
[02:56:22] LATE LETTER TODAY FROM REDONDO BEACH
[02:56:23] MAYOR BILL BRAND IN
[02:56:28] RESPONSE TO REQUEST FROM CITY OF HERMOSA
[02:56:29] BEACH TO STUDY THE
[02:56:33] PROJECT FEASIBILITY ON FRANCISCA AND IF
[02:56:34] IT WAS DETERMINED TO
[02:56:41] BE FEASIBLE WOULD THEY ALLOW US TO BUILD
[02:56:42] THE PROJECT THERE AND
[02:56:44] WE RECEIVED THAT RESPONSE LATE TODAY.
[02:56:45] DOES THE CITY MANAGER
[02:56:49] OR CITY ATTORNEY WANT TO GIVE A HIGH
[02:56:50] LEVEL INTERPRETATION OF
[02:56:52] THAT FOR THE BENEFIT OF EVERYONE HERE
[02:56:53] WHO DIDN'T GET A CHANCE
[02:56:56] TO READ IT. IT IS A THREE PAGE LETTER
[02:56:57] ATTACHED AS A
[02:57:00] SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE AGENDA.
[02:57:18] >> MADAM MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, I
[02:57:19] WANTED TO PROVIDE A
[02:57:26] UPDATE. APPROXIMATELY A WEEK OR WEEK AND
[02:57:27] A HALF AGO WE HAD A
[02:57:31] LETTER SENT FROM OUR MAYOR TO THE MAYOR
[02:57:32] OF REDONDO BEACH
[02:57:35] ASKING FOR THEIR APPROVAL TO LOOK AT
[02:57:36] NORTH FRANCISCA AVENUE IN
[02:57:42] REDONDO BEACH AS A ALTERNATIVE LOCATION
[02:57:43] FOR THE INFILTRATION
[02:57:49] PROJECT SO WE RECEIVED THE RESPONSE
[02:57:50] SHORTLY BEFORE YOU ENTERED
[02:57:53] INTO CLOSED SESSION AND THE HIGH LEVEL
[02:57:54] SUMMARY IS REDONDO
[02:57:59] BEACH IS COMMITTED TO WORKING WITH THE
[02:58:00] PARTNERS TO COMPLETE
[02:58:02] PROJECTS THAT HELP PRESERVE AND ENHANCE
[02:58:03] THE BENEFICIAL USES OF
[02:58:06] RECEIVING WATER BODIES AND INSURE
[02:58:07] COMPLIANCE WITH OUR MPDS
[02:58:10] PERMIT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
[02:58:11] THEY REQUEST THAT IF
[02:58:14] THE AGENCIES AND BEACH CITY GROUPS
[02:58:15] COLLECTIVELY AGREE TO FUND
[02:58:24] OR FUND [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] AS A
[02:58:25] POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVE
[02:58:30] PROJECT SITE THE CITY WOULD PROVIDE THE
Page 41 of 94
[02:58:31] RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT
[02:58:33] SAID NEEDED TO PERFORM THE STUDY. THE
[02:58:34] SECOND OF THE 4
[02:58:36] CONDITIONS IS IF THE EXPLORATION OF
[02:58:37] NORTH FRANCISCA AVENUE
[02:58:41] DOES NOT RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE BEACH
[02:58:42] CITIES GROUP OR THE
[02:58:45] CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES NOT AGREE TO
[02:58:46] INDIVIDUALLY AND
[02:58:49] SEPARATELY FUND THE STUDY REDONDO BEACH
[02:58:50] IS FORCED TO CONSIDER
[02:58:54] OTHER COMPLIANCE OPTIONS. ADDITIONALLY,
[02:58:55] THEY REQUEST OUR CITY
[02:59:01] PROVIDE ASSURANCE THAT OTHER ALTERNATIVE
[02:59:02] SITES WITHIN HERMOSA
[02:59:06] BEACH ALSO BE STUDIED TO POSSIBLY MEET
[02:59:07] THE GROUP INFILTRATION
[02:59:11] TARGETS AS IT IS UNKNOWN IF NORTH
[02:59:12] FRANCISCA PROVIDES ENOUGH
[02:59:16] ROOM FOR COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS.
[02:59:17] REDONDO BEACH REQUEST THE
[02:59:21] CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TAKE THE LEAD
[02:59:22] WORKING WITH THE REGIONAL
[02:59:25] BOARD TO NEGOTIATE APPROVAL OF THE
[02:59:26] MODIFIED AND ADDRESS THE
[02:59:29] REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION GOALS AND
[02:59:30] COMPLIANCE DATES. THE
[02:59:33] SHORT SUMMARY.
[02:59:34] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT UPDATE.
[02:59:35] I THINK THAT WAS A
[02:59:37] BENEFIT TO EVERYONE HERE LISTENING. AS
[02:59:38] MENTIONED EARLIER,
[02:59:42] COUNCIL MEMBER FANGARY AND I ARE ON A
[02:59:43] SUBCOMMITTEE TOGETHER
[02:59:48] AND ALL THOUGH IT ISN'T IN THE STAFF
[02:59:49] REPORT, WE FELT IT WAS
[02:59:51] IMPORTANT TO OFFER AN UNUSUAL
[02:59:52] RECOMMENDATION BEFORE PUBLIC
[02:59:57] COMMENT BUT WE FELT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO
[02:59:58] SHARE WITH EVERYONE
[03:00:00] HERE TODAY AND ANYONE WATCHING FROM
[03:00:01] HOME. AS A SUBCOMMITTEE
[03:00:05] CONSISTING OF MYSELF AND COUNCIL MEMBER
[03:00:06] FANGARY, WE HAVE
[03:00:09] REVIEWED YOUR WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS,
[03:00:10] VISITED THE VARIOUS
[03:00:14] PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND MET WITH MANY OF
Page 42 of 94
[03:00:15] YOU PERSONALLY. WE
[03:00:18] HAVE HEARD YOUR CONCERNS AND OUR
[03:00:19] RECOMMENDATION IS AS FOLLOWS:
[03:00:23] OPTION 1, PLACING THE PROJECT ON THE
[03:00:24] GREEN BELT IS NOT
[03:00:27] RECOMMENDED. OPTION 2, PLACING THE
[03:00:28] PROJECT IN A ALTERNATIVE
[03:00:33] LOCATION IN HERMOSA INCLUDING SOUTH PARK
[03:00:34] IS NOT RECOMMENDED BY
[03:00:37] THE SUBCOMMITTEE AT THIS TIME.
[03:00:38] SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE WE LACK
[03:00:42] INFORMATION TO MAKE A INFORMED AND
[03:00:43] PRUDENT DECISION. WE
[03:00:46] RECOMMEND OPTION 3. INITIATING A
[03:00:47] AMENDMENT REVISION OR
[03:00:52] DISSOLUTION OF MEMORANDUM OF
[03:00:53] UNDERSTANDING TO NEGOTIATE A
[03:00:56] SUITABLE SUBSTITUTE PROJECT WITH THE
[03:00:57] CITY PARTNERS. FURTHER,
[03:00:59] WE RECOMMEND DIRECTING STAFF TO WORK
[03:01:00] WITH OUR PARTNERS, OUR
[03:01:04] STATE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, AND THE
[03:01:05] STATE WATER BOARD TO
[03:01:08] SALVAGE EXISTING GRANT FUNDING TO THE
[03:01:09] EXTENT FEASIBLE. WITH
[03:01:14] THAT-
[03:01:16] (APPLAUSE)
[03:01:23] THAT'S JUST TWO PEOPLES RECOMMENDATION
[03:01:24] UP HERE, SO THAT IS NOT
[03:01:29] THE WILL OF THE ENTIRE COUNCIL. WE ARE
[03:01:30] GOING TO WAIT TO GO TO
[03:01:34] A VOTE AFTER WE OPEN UP PUBLIC COMMENT.
[03:01:35] MADAM CLERK.
[03:01:39] >> MADAM MAYOR, I DID HAVE A QUESTION.
[03:01:42] >> ABSOLUTELY.
[03:01:43] >> SO, BASED-TO STAFFING BASED ON THAT
[03:01:44] RECOMMENDATION, AGAIN
[03:01:50] CAN YOU GIVE US A SCENARIO WHAT THAT
[03:01:51] MIGHT LOOK LIKE MOVING
[03:01:53] FORWARD? IN OTHER WORDS WE WOULD LOSE
[03:01:54] THE GRANT FUNDING WOULD
[03:02:03] WE NOT?
[03:02:04] >> THAT IS CORRECT.
[03:02:05] >> WE HAVE TO POTENTIALLY REPAY OUR
[03:02:06] COLLECTIVE CITIES INVOLVED
[03:02:10] HERE-THE WORK THAT HAS BEEN DONE WE LOSE
[03:02:11] THAT AS WELL, RIGHT?
Page 43 of 94
[03:02:14] WE HAVE TO-THERE IS COST ASSOCIATED WITH
[03:02:15] IT, IT IS ONLY FAIR
[03:02:19] THAT WE BASICALLY SAY WHAT THOSE COSTS
[03:02:20] ARE.
[03:02:22] >> THERE MAY BE COST ASSOCIATED WITH
[03:02:23] THAT, I DON'T KNOW WHERE
[03:02:31] THE WORK IS SALVAGEABLE. IT DON'T WANT
[03:02:32] TO SPECULATE WHAT THE
[03:02:36] PARTNER CITIES WILL OR WILL NOT DEMAND
[03:02:37] OF US.
[03:02:39] >> BUT, SO THERE IS A LOT OF-
[03:02:44] >> UNKNOWNS.
[03:02:45] >> UNKNOWNS TO THIS.
[03:02:46] >> RIGHT.
[03:02:47] >> THINGS THAT ARE COMPLETELY BEYOND OUR
[03:02:48] CONTROL IN TERMS OF
[03:02:52] WHAT OUR PARTNER CITIES DECIDE TO DO,
[03:02:53] WHAT THE REGIONAL BOARD
[03:02:57] DECIDES TO DO IN RELATION TO THE
[03:02:58] CONVERSATION WITH THEM BY
[03:03:02] APRIL 1. AM I MISSING OTHER PARTS HERE
[03:03:03] THAT--? THOSE ARE THE
[03:03:11] TWO MAIN THINGS THAT WE WILL BE
[03:03:12] CONFRONTED WITH, CORRECT?
[03:03:17] >> I THINK-LIKE I SAID, WE HAVE KATHLEEN
[03:03:18] HERE TO TALK ABOUT
[03:03:23] NEXT STEPS AND WHAT THAT WILL LOOK LIKE
[03:03:24] IF WE ROLL BACK THE
[03:03:28] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] AND HAVE TO LOOK AT
[03:03:29] VARIOUS SCENARIOS, SO
[03:03:31] THERE IS ASSOCIATED COSTS WE HAVE TO DO
[03:03:32] ADDITIONAL MODELING SO
[03:03:37] I'LL LET YOU SPEAK TO THAT.
[03:03:38] >> SO, DEPENDING ON ULTIMATE LOCATION OF
[03:03:39] THE PROJECT AND THE
[03:03:43] SIZE OF THE PROJECT THERE IS A POTENTIAL
[03:03:44] TO HAVE TO REVISE THE
[03:03:48] REASONABLE ASSURANCE ANALYSIS AND THE
[03:03:49] EWP FOR A PROJECT SO
[03:03:54] THERE WILL BE COST ASSOCIATED WITH THAT.
[03:03:55] THE GROUP HAS TO
[03:03:59] RERUN THE MODEL AND PRODUCE A REVISED
[03:04:00] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS]
[03:04:05] UNDER THE CURRENT PERMIT BY JUNE 2021 SO
[03:04:06] YOU WILL BE INCURRING
[03:04:09] THAT AT THAT POINT IN TIME. NOW IT MIGHT
[03:04:10] HAVE BEEN A FAIRLY
Page 44 of 94
[03:04:13] NOMINAL EFFORT HAD THE PROJECTS REMAINED
[03:04:14] AS THEY WERE BUT IF
[03:04:18] YOU SHUFFLE THE PROJECTS OR CHANGE THE
[03:04:19] LOCATIONS YOU HAVE TO
[03:04:22] RERUN THE MODELING TO SHOW THAT THE NEW
[03:04:23] PROJECTS STILL ACHIEVE
[03:04:25] THE SAME EFFECT. SO, THERE IS COST
[03:04:26] ASSOCIATED WITH THAT.
[03:04:29] >> AND THEN, BUT IF--IN TERMS OF THE
[03:04:30] MAYOR'S MEMO BASICALLY
[03:04:36] SAYS THAT WE WOULD SHOULDER THE COST FOR
[03:04:37] THE CONSTRUCTION? IN
[03:04:43] OTHER WORDS NOT JUST THE LEAD BUT WE PAY
[03:04:44] FOR IT?
[03:04:46] >> THE WAY I UNDERSTAND THAT IS THEY ARE
[03:04:47] ASKING HERMOSA BEACH
[03:04:49] TO FUND THE COST OF THE PRELIMINARY
[03:04:50] ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION
[03:04:53] NEEDED TO DETERMINE WHETHER
[03:04:54] FRANCISCA-LIKE THE SAME COSTS
[03:04:58] >> WHAT COULD THOSE COSTS BE?
[03:05:05] >> THE SAME WORK FOR THE GREEN BELT.
[03:05:08] >> $40 THOUSAND.
[03:05:09] >> $230 THOUSAND.
[03:05:11] >> $230 THOUSAND. THAT IS IMPORTANT
[03:05:12] NUMBER TO HAVE. THANK
[03:05:15] YOU.
[03:05:17] >> COUNCIL MEMBER MASSEY.
[03:05:18] >> MADAM MAYOR, IF I MIGHT. KATHLEEN I
[03:05:19] HAVE A QUICK QUESTION
[03:05:22] FOR YOU AND WANTED TO MAKE SURE I'M
[03:05:23] CLEAR FROM-WE JUST GOT THE
[03:05:25] LETTER FROM REDONDO BEACH THIS EVENING.
[03:05:26] I WANT TO MAKE SURE
[03:05:31] I'M CLEAR. MY UNDERSTANDING IS ALL
[03:05:32] REDONDO BEACH IS SAYING
[03:05:35] THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT UNDER CERTAIN
[03:05:36] CONDITIONS THEY PERMIT
[03:05:38] US TO STUDY FRANCISCA STREET AS A
[03:05:39] POTENTIAL LOCATION. THEY
[03:05:42] ARE NOT SAYING THIS IS A LOCATION FOR
[03:05:43] THE PROJECT.
[03:05:46] >> CORRECT.
[03:05:47] >> OKAY. KATHLEEN, MY QUESTION FOR YOU
[03:05:48] IS, FORGET WHICH
[03:05:51] DOCUMENT IT IS AND MAYBE THE EWIMP BUT
[03:05:52] FOR THIS PARTICULAR
Page 45 of 94
[03:05:57] WATERSHED AND PROJECT, I RECALL A
[03:05:58] NOTATION FRANCISCA STREET
[03:06:05] COULD BE CONSIDERED.
[03:06:06] >> WE HAD A ALTERNATIVE SITE RETAINED
[03:06:07] FOR A SITE ON THE OTHER
[03:06:11] SIDE OF HERONDO STREET. FRANCISCA WASN'T
[03:06:12] THE LOCATION BUT
[03:06:17] THAT APPROXIMATELY AT THE SAME LOCATION,
[03:06:18] SO FROM THAT
[03:06:22] STANDPOINT IF THE PROJECT WERE THE SAME
[03:06:23] SIZE AND
[03:06:30] FRANSISCA WITH THE SAME HYDRAULIC
[03:06:31] CHARACTERISTIC YOU COULD
[03:06:34] POTENTIALLY NOT HAVE TO REVISE ASSUMING
[03:06:35] YOU CAN MEET THE DEAD
[03:06:38] PP LINE.
[03:06:39] >> THE SECOND QUESTION IS DID WE DO
[03:06:40] REMODELING OF FRANCISCA
[03:06:43] STREET? IS THERE EXISTING MODELING?
[03:06:46] >> NO. BUT THE MODELING DONE HAS TO DO
[03:06:47] WITH LOCATION ALONG
[03:06:53] THAT STORM DRAIN WHERE IT DIVERSION
[03:06:54] WOULD BE. I GUESS IT
[03:06:58] DIVERSION IS IN A SIMILAR SPOT AND SO
[03:06:59] THAT PART OF THE
[03:07:02] HYDRAULICS WOULD BE OKAY. THE LEVEL AT
[03:07:03] WHICH THE PROJECT WERE
[03:07:05] MODELED WAS JUST 10 PERCENT CONCEPT SO
[03:07:06] FAIRLY HIGH LEVEL SO
[03:07:12] FOR THE SENSITIVITY FOR WHAT WAS DONE I
[03:07:13] THINK IF IT IS THE
[03:07:17] SAME SIZE A THAT PROPOSED GREEN BELT AND
[03:07:18] CAN HANDLE THE SAME
[03:07:21] VOLUME OF WATER IT WOULD BE COMPARABLE
[03:07:22] AND YOU WILL NOT HAVE
[03:07:25] TO REQUEST REVISION AT THIS TIME TO
[03:07:26] SHIFT TO FRANCISCA.
[03:07:31] >> THIS MAY BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE
[03:07:32] ENGINEER. IN THE EVENT IF
[03:07:38] A FRANCISCA STREET DOESN'T HAVE THE
[03:07:39] VOLUME THAT THE GREEN BELT
[03:07:41] PROJECT IN THE-
[03:07:45] >> SAME PERMEABILITY. YOU NEED BOTH.
[03:07:49] >> CAN YOU-IS IT FEASIBLE TO SAY
[03:07:50] FRANCISCA STREET TAKES 70
[03:07:55] PERCENT OF THE VOLUME AND BUILD A
[03:07:56] PROJECT ON IN THE GREEN BELT
Page 46 of 94
[03:08:00] OR IN HER MOSEY BEACH THAT TAKES 30
[03:08:01] PERCENT OF THE VOLUME YOU
[03:08:04] HAVE TO CAPTURE IN THE STORM DRAIN?
[03:08:06] >> IF IT COMES OFF THE SAME DIVERSION
[03:08:07] LOCATION PROBABLY IT IS
[03:08:10] OKAY TO HAVE IT-AT SOME POINT YOU RERUN
[03:08:11] THE MODEL IN A YEAR
[03:08:18] AND A HALF BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO DO THAT
[03:08:19] AND IF YOU HAVE
[03:08:21] SHUFFLING IT ISN'T A BIG DEAL.
[03:08:23] >> MY LAST QUESTION IS, AES IS A KNOWN
[03:08:24] CONTAMINATED SITE AND
[03:08:32] THAT CONTAMINATION AS I UNDERSTAND IT IS
[03:08:33] CLOSE TO THE NORTHERN
[03:08:35] SIDE OF THE PLANT SO NEAR FRANCISCA AND
[03:08:36] HERONDO STREET. MY
[03:08:41] UNDERSTANDING IS ONE OF THE CRITERIA THE
[03:08:42] REGIONAL BOARD USE TO
[03:08:45] EXCLUDE A LOCATION IS PROXIMITY TO KNOWN
[03:08:46] CONTAMINATION BECAUSE
[03:08:51] WHEN YOU PECULATE WATERS [INAUDIBLE
[03:08:52] COMMENTS]
[03:08:56] >> THAT'S RIGHT.
[03:08:58] >> DO YOU HAVE INFORMATION TO IMPART ON
[03:08:59] THAT ON TERMS WHETHER
[03:09:01] THAT WILL AFFECT THE ANALYSIS?
[03:09:03] >> IF YOU FELT THE SITE TO BE
[03:09:04] CONTAMINATED IT WOULD CAUSE
[03:09:07] PROBLEMS AND HAVE IT FIND A WAY TO
[03:09:08] REMEDIATE IT TO INFILTRATE.
[03:09:13] THE REGIONAL BOARD WILL NOT ENCOURAGE TO
[03:09:14] INFILTRATE THERE. A
[03:09:20] SIMILAR PROBLEM WE ARE HAVING A THE
[03:09:21] TORRANCE AIRPORT WITH A
[03:09:25] INFILTRATION PROJECT WHERE THEY HAVE TO
[03:09:26] MODEL TO SHOW THEY
[03:09:28] WILL NOT MOVE A CONTAMINATE PLOOM TO
[03:09:29] INFILTRATE FROM THE
[03:09:37] PENINSULA AND SPENT QUITE A BIT OF WORK
[03:09:38] TRYING TO DO THAT BUT
[03:09:41] THEY ARE NOT INFILTRATING ON IT TOP. YOU
[03:09:42] CAN NOT INFILTRATE
[03:09:48] ON TOP OF THE POLLUTANTS. THE REGIONAL
[03:09:49] BOARD WILL NOT ISSUE A
[03:09:53] PERMIT AND YOU HAVE TO GET THE
[03:09:54] GROUNDWATER AND STORMWATER
[03:09:56] GROUP FOR THAT TYPE OF A SCENARIO.
Page 47 of 94
[03:10:00] >> THANK YOU.
[03:10:01] >> ONE LAST QUESTION,S MADAM MAYOR.
[03:10:02] MADAM CITY MANAGER, DID I
[03:10:07] MISS HEAR IN TERMS OF THE MAYOR'S LETTER
[03:10:08] THAT HE'S ALSO
[03:10:15] REQUIRING THAT WE ALSO LOOK AT ALTERNATE
[03:10:16] SITES. SO, THAT IS
[03:10:22] SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD PAY FOR?
[03:10:23] EXPLORING-IS IT UNDER THE
[03:10:28] STANDARD COST SHARING? AGAIN, THEY HAVE
[03:10:29] TO AGREE TO IT, WOULD
[03:10:33] THEY NOT?
[03:10:34] >> THEY HAVE TO AGREE TO IT AND IT'S NOT
[03:10:35] ARTICULATED IN THAT
[03:10:38] CONDITION, CONDITION NUMBER 3 WHETHER IT
[03:10:39] IS EXCLUSIVELY AT OUR
[03:10:43] COST. BUT IT DOES REQUEST THAT WE
[03:10:44] PROVIDE ASSURANCE AND OTHER
[03:10:50] ALTERNATIVE SITES IN OUR OTHER THAN CITY
[03:10:51] WOULD ALSO BE
[03:10:55] STUDIED. IT DOESN'T REFERENCE COST
[03:10:56] THERE.
[03:10:57] >> THANK YOU.
[03:10:58] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR.
[03:11:00] >> COUNCIL MEMBER FANGARY.
[03:11:02] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. SUMMARIZED
[03:11:03] THE SUBCOMMITTEE
[03:11:08] RECOMMENDATION AND WANTED TO MAKE QUICK
[03:11:09] COMMENTS. ONE IS THAT
[03:11:11] THE RECOMMENDATION THAT WE MADE WAS
[03:11:12] BASED ON SPECIFICALLY
[03:11:14] GOING OUT THERE TO THE PROPERTY STANDING
[03:11:15] IN THE FRONT DOOR OF
[03:11:17] THE PROPERTY ON THE GREEN BELT AND GOING
[03:11:18] TO SOUTH PARK AND
[03:11:20] RESPONDING HOURS OVER THE WEEKEND AND
[03:11:21] SEEING AND HEARING THE
[03:11:25] INPUT WE RECEIVED FROM YOU WHICH WE
[03:11:26] APPRECIATE. I THINK THERE
[03:11:31] IS A LOT OF THINGS THAT STILL NEED TO BE
[03:11:32] EXPLORED AND WHERE
[03:11:35] THE RECOMMENDATION COMES FROM. I WANT TO
[03:11:36] BRIEFLY TALK ABOUT
[03:11:38] THE INPUT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY ABOUT
[03:11:39] THE GRANT AND BASED ON
[03:11:41] THE DIALOGUE THAT THE MAYOR AND I HAD
[03:11:42] OUR REPRESENTATIVES IN
Page 48 of 94
[03:11:47] SACRAMENTO. WE REACHED OUT TO STATE
[03:11:48] SENATOR BEN ALLEN AND
[03:11:52] STAFF AND [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] AND HIS
[03:11:53] STAFF BASICALLY ASKING
[03:11:54] THEM AS OUR SMALL CITY HERE HERMOSA
[03:11:55] BEACH TO CONNECT WITH THE
[03:11:59] FOLKS IN SACRAMENTO RELATED TO THE WORK
[03:12:00] OF THE STATE BOARD TO
[03:12:03] ASSIST IN THE PROCESS TO EXPLAIN THE
[03:12:04] REASON WHY WE ARE
[03:12:07] REEVALUATING THE LOCATION AND EVEN
[03:12:08] THOUGH WE DONT HAVE A
[03:12:10] COMMITMENT TO GIVE A ANSWER WE HAVE A
[03:12:11] COMMITMENT TO WORK WITH
[03:12:13] US AND REPRESENT US AT THE STATE LEVEL
[03:12:14] TO HELP US. I'M NOT
[03:12:18] USUALLY THE MOST OPTIMISTIC IN THE ROOM
[03:12:19] BUT A LITTLE MORE
[03:12:23] OPTIMISTIC FOR THE GRANT FUNDING. APRIL
[03:12:24] 1 COMES AROUND WE
[03:12:26] COULD GET RECOMMENDATION FROM THE GRANT
[03:12:27] MANAGER TO HIS BOSS OR
[03:12:31] BOSSES TO SAY I DONT HAVE THE
[03:12:32] INFORMATION THAT NEEDED FROM
[03:12:35] HERMOSA BEACH AND MY RECOMMENDATION IS
[03:12:36] TO REVOKE THE GRANT AND
[03:12:38] COULD VERY WELL BE IT GRANT IS REVOKED.
[03:12:39] BASED ON THE
[03:12:45] INFORMATION WE PROVIDED AND ON A
[03:12:46] SPECIFIC REPRESENTATION TO
[03:12:48] OUR REPRESENTATIVES IN SACRAMENTO AND
[03:12:49] THE STATE BOARD THE
[03:12:53] REASON FOR THE CHANGE AND REASON FOR THE
[03:12:54] ADDITIONAL TIME WE
[03:12:56] NEED IS PREMISED ON THE INPUT FROM THE
[03:12:57] COMMUNITY AND ISSUES
[03:13:00] RAISED AND THE FACT WE ARE WORKING WITH
[03:13:01] REDONDO BEACH AND
[03:13:05] PARTNERS EVALUATING OPTIONS. I HAVE A
[03:13:06] LITTLE MORE OPTIMISTIC
[03:13:11] VIEW THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR THE GRANT TO
[03:13:12] REMAIN OR FOR THE
[03:13:13] GRANT EXTENSION TO EXTEND PAST APRIL 1
[03:13:14] TO ALLOW US TO CONTINUE
[03:13:18] DIALOGUE WITH REDONDO BEACH SO THAT IS
[03:13:19] WHERE MY AND MAYOR
[03:13:23] RECOMMENDATION IS COMING FROM. WE
Page 49 of 94
[03:13:24] HAVEN'T GIVEN UP ON THE
[03:13:27] GRANT OPPORTUNITY BUT THAT IS WHAT OUR
[03:13:28] RECOMMENDATION IS BASED
[03:13:30] ON.
[03:13:31] >> THANK YOU. DID WE HAVE ANOTHER
[03:13:32] COMMENT? ALRIGHT. MADAM
[03:13:36] CLERK.
[03:13:37] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. I ONLY HAVE
[03:13:38] ABOUT 10 SPEAKER
[03:13:44] CARDS. SHALL I CALL 3 AT A TIME, 5 AT A
[03:13:45] TIME?
[03:13:48] >> 3 AT A TIME AND IF YOU ARE IN THE
[03:13:49] AUDIENCE AND HAVEN'T
[03:13:51] FILLED OUT A SPEAKER CARD, IT IS REALLY
[03:13:52] HELPFUL IF YOU DO.
[03:13:55] YOU DON'T HAVE TO, BUT IT HELPS US STAY
[03:13:56] ORDERLY IN THE MEETING
[03:13:59] SO IF YOU DON'T MIND TAKING A MINUTE AND
[03:14:00] GRABBING A CARD WHILE
[03:14:05] OTHER SPEAKERS COME FORWARD.
[03:14:06] >> MAX RILEY. MICHAELA WEBB. I BELIEVE
[03:14:07] MICHAELA SPOKE
[03:14:21] ALREADY [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] AND LUKE
[03:14:22] BUCKHAGAN.
[03:14:23] >> MAX, YOU ARE UP.
[03:14:26] >> HI I'M MAX RILEY. IF YOU DIDN'T
[03:14:27] ALREADY KNOW THAT. I LIVE
[03:14:32] AT 105410TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. IT
[03:14:33] IS ABOUT PROSPECT AND
[03:14:37] AVIATION. FIRST I WANT TO THANK THE
[03:14:38] COMMUNITY BEING REALLY
[03:14:41] INVOLVED IN THE ISSUE BECAUSE THERE ARE
[03:14:42] A LOT OF ISSUES HERE
[03:14:45] WHERE WE DON'T HAVE THE CHAMBERS FULL
[03:14:46] LIKE TODAY AND HERE WE
[03:14:48] HAVE ALL THE VOICES FROM ALL THE SIDES
[03:14:49] COMING TOGETHER TO FIND
[03:14:52] A GOOD SOLUTION SO REALLY HAPPY ABOUT
[03:14:53] THAT. I WILL SAY THE
[03:14:55] BAD WORDS. I SUPPORT THE INFILTRATION
[03:14:56] PROJECT. SO, THERE ARE
[03:15:01] QUITE A FEW MERITS TO THE PROJECT THAT
[03:15:02] CAN CAUSE IT TO BE GOOD
[03:15:04] FOR OUR CITY. BEACHES IN THE NAME OF
[03:15:05] HERMOSA BEACH AND I
[03:15:09] THINK WE REALLY NEED TO FOCUS ON THE
[03:15:10] BEACH PART OF OUR CITY,
Page 50 of 94
[03:15:12] OBVIOUSLY PARKS AND GREEN SPACES ARE
[03:15:13] VERY IMPORTANT PARTS OF
[03:15:16] ANY CITY AROUND THE WORLD. HOWEVER, HERE
[03:15:17] I THINK THE MOST
[03:15:20] IMPORTANT GREEN SPACE MIGHT BE OUR BEACH
[03:15:21] AND OCEAN SO WE NEED
[03:15:23] TO FOCUS ON PROTECTING THAT BEFORE WE
[03:15:24] WRECK THE PARKS. THE
[03:15:28] GREEN BELT IS OBVIOUSLY A GOOD CHOICE AS
[03:15:29] TALKED ABOUT BY THE
[03:15:33] STUDIES MADE PREVIOUSLY, HOWEVER THE
[03:15:34] GREEN BELT IS A MASSIVE
[03:15:38] PLACE PEOPLE USE FOR WALKS, WALKING DOGS
[03:15:39] OTHER THINGS SO DONT
[03:15:42] THINK THIS IS THE BEST SPOT. I BELIEVE
[03:15:43] THE BEST SPOT FOR THE
[03:15:45] INFILTRATION PROJECT IS SOUTH PARK.
[03:15:46] MERITS OF THE SITE OF
[03:15:50] SOUTH PARK. IT IS A BIG OPEN SPACE I
[03:15:51] PROBABLY WON'T EFFECT
[03:15:54] UTILITIES NEARLY AS MUCH THEN AT SOUTH
[03:15:55] PARK. THERE IS A TON
[03:15:58] OF ENTRANCES WHICH IS GOOD FOR TRAFFIC
[03:15:59] MANAGEMENT BECAUSE WE
[03:16:01] MIGHT BE ABLE TO USE A ROTATING SCHEDULE
[03:16:02] FOR TRUCKS TO COME
[03:16:04] FROM DIFFERENT DIRECTION TO LIMIT
[03:16:05] TRAFFIC TO EACH AREA. IT IS
[03:16:10] OVERALL CONTAINED AREA. UNLIKE THE GREEN
[03:16:11] BELT IT ISN'T
[03:16:15] TOUCHES TONS OF HOUSES AND THE CENTRAL
[03:16:16] AREA IS A GOOD
[03:16:20] DISTANCE. IT HAS LOWER LIQUEFACTION RISK
[03:16:21] THEN OTHER AREAS
[03:16:24] CONSIDERED AND MOST IMPORTANTLY IS WE
[03:16:25] HAVE A SIMILAR PROJECT
[03:16:28] AT BOLIVAR PARK AND KNOW THAT THE
[03:16:29] PROJECT CAN WORK WELL. IF
[03:16:32] YOU LOOK AT BOLIVAR BARK YOU SEE THAT IT
[03:16:33] TURNED OUT WELL IN A
[03:16:35] NUMBER OF WAYS. IT IS BEAUTIFUL IF YOU
[03:16:36] LOOK IT UP AND GO TO
[03:16:38] IMAGES IT JUST LOOKS LIKE A PARK. YOU
[03:16:39] CAN'T TELL. IT HAS 4.5
[03:16:45] STARS ON GOOGLE SO I THINK THAT IS A
[03:16:46] GOOD PARK. OVERALL I
[03:16:51] THINK A PARK PROJECT IS GREAT. SOME
Page 51 of 94
[03:16:52] PROBLEMS WITH THIS ARE
[03:16:55] PROBLEMS WITH WHERE THE KIDS MIGHT PLAY
[03:16:56] DURING THE PROJECT AND
[03:16:58] TO DEAL WITH THIS I SUGGEST
[03:16:59] IMPLEMENTATION OF LIMITING THE
[03:17:02] PROJECT TO A SMALL AREA SO KIDS CAN USE
[03:17:03] THE PLAYGROUND OR
[03:17:07] POSSIBLY OTHER AREAS WHILE THE PROJECT
[03:17:08] IS GOING ON. AGAIN,
[03:17:11] SECOND PEOPLE COMPLAINED ABOUT TRAFFIC
[03:17:12] TO DEAL WITH THIS. I
[03:17:14] MIGHT SUGGEST AS SAID BEFORE THE
[03:17:15] IMPLEMENTATION OF MULTIPLE
[03:17:19] ROUTES ROTATING. I BELIEVE SOUTH PARK IS
[03:17:20] THE BEST PLACE FOR
[03:17:24] THE ISSUE AND THERE ARE MASSIVE
[03:17:25] FINANCIAL BURDENS THAT COME
[03:17:28] WITH NOT DOING THE PROJECT AND THROUGH
[03:17:29] THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
[03:17:30] THE SOLUTIONS I BELIEVE WE CAN CREATE
[03:17:31] THE BEST HERMOSA BEACH
[03:17:33] FOR EVERYONE.
[03:17:34] >> THANK YOU. GARRETT.
[03:17:37] >> SO, MY NAME IS GARRETT [INAUDIBLE
[03:17:38] COMMENTS] I WANT TO THANK
[03:17:42] YOU GUYS SO MUCH FOR WEIGHING OUT ALL
[03:17:43] OUR CONCERNS. I SELDOM
[03:17:48] SPEAK UP OR SHOW UP TO COMMUNITY
[03:17:49] MEETINGS UNLESS I FEEL
[03:17:52] PASSIONATE ABOUT A ISSUE BUT THIS TOPIC
[03:17:53] TO MAKE THE OCEAN
[03:17:55] CLEANER, TO INSURE THE WATER ISN'T
[03:17:56] CONTAMINATED I NEVER
[03:17:58] IMAGINE WE WOULD BE DISCUSSING A TOPIC
[03:17:59] LIKE THIS. WE NEED
[03:18:03] THIS STORM DRAIN. NOW, I UNDERSTAND YOUR
[03:18:04] CONCERNS ABOUT
[03:18:08] TRAFFIC, FUMES AS WELL AS THE COMPANY
[03:18:09] BEING SUSPICIOUS AND
[03:18:14] LAND VALUE, BUT INSTEAD OF ATTEMPTING TO
[03:18:15] CANCEL PROJECTS LET'S
[03:18:18] WORK TOGETHER TO COME UP WITH FEASIBLE
[03:18:19] SOLUTIONS THAT WORK TO
[03:18:21] EASE EVERYBODY'S CONCERNS. FOR TRAFFIC,
[03:18:22] I WOULD SUGGEST THAT
[03:18:24] THE COMPANY AS WELL AS THE CITY SHOULD
[03:18:25] COME UP WITH A
Page 52 of 94
[03:18:28] EFFICIENT TRAFFIC PLANS HOW TO MINIMIZE
[03:18:29] TRAFFIC ON SURFACE
[03:18:31] STREETS INSURING THE LEAST AMOUNT OF
[03:18:32] PEOPLE WILL BE EFFECTED.
[03:18:35] I FEEL 4 ALTERNATING ROUTES SO TRUCKS
[03:18:36] DON'T SAY THE SAME ROUTE
[03:18:43] EVERY DAY WOULD BE BENEFICIAL. THESE
[03:18:44] ROUTES ALSO COINCIDE
[03:18:50] WITH STREET SWEEPING SCHEDULES.
[03:18:51] SECONDLY, ABOUT THE FUMES, I
[03:18:54] PROPOSE THAT TRUCKS WOULD BE ONLY
[03:18:55] PERMITTED TO IDLE ON CYPRESS
[03:19:01] BETWEEN 6 AND 8 STREET AND A SMALL
[03:19:02] SECTION OF 6 STREET FROM
[03:19:05] VALLEY TO CYPRESS ALL NON RESIDENTIAL
[03:19:06] AREAS WITH WAREHOUSES
[03:19:10] SURROUNDING THEM. FINALLY, NOT FINALLY,
[03:19:11] SORRY, ABOUT THE
[03:19:14] VALIDITY OF THE COMPANY, WE NEED TO LOOK
[03:19:15] NO FURTHER THEN BULL
[03:19:19] VAR PARK THAT THEY TRANSFORMED TO A AREA
[03:19:20] GOOD FOR FAMILIES, IT
[03:19:24] IS GOOD FOR PEOPLE AND GOOD FOR
[03:19:25] CHILDREN. FINALLY, ABOUT THE
[03:19:29] LAND VALUE, A SMALL FILTER WILL NOT
[03:19:30] EFFECT THE LAND VALUE AS
[03:19:38] THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT IS
[03:19:39] TEMPORARY. I TELL YOU, A
[03:19:43] DIRTY UNCLEAN COAST LINE WILL. WE ARE
[03:19:44] FORTUNATE TO HAVE
[03:19:47] INCREDIBLY VALUABLE PROPERTIES IN THE
[03:19:48] AREA BECAUSE OF OUR
[03:19:51] PRISTINE BEACHES. IF WE INSURE OUR OCEAN
[03:19:52] REMAINS CLEAN WE CAN
[03:19:54] INSURE OUR PROPERTY EVALUATES IN HER
[03:19:55] MOSA BEACH REMAINS AT THE
[03:20:00] CURRENT LEVEL. PARENT, I ENCOURAGE YOU
[03:20:01] TO THINK OF US, THE
[03:20:03] NEXT GENERATION INSTEAD OF YOU AND YOUR
[03:20:04] VESTED INTEREST. I'M
[03:20:08] VERY HOPEFUL OF YOU TO THINK ABOUT HOW
[03:20:09] MUCH CLEANER OUR WATER
[03:20:11] WILL BE FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS GREAT
[03:20:12] COMMUNITY AND LASTLY, I
[03:20:16] BEG OF YOU TO THINK OF THE BENEFITS OF
[03:20:17] CLEANER WATER AND A
[03:20:19] SAFER BEACH FOR OUR COMMUNITY THRIVES
Page 53 of 94
[03:20:20] OFF OF THIS. THANK YOU
[03:20:23] VERY MUCH.
[03:20:24] >> THANK YOU, GARRETT. LUKE AND MADAM
[03:20:25] CLERK IF YOU--
[03:20:31] >> HOLD ON ONE SECOND. I DON'T KNOW WHAT
[03:20:32] THE OUTBURST WAS BUT
[03:20:35] EXPECT SOMETHING LIKE THAT WONT HAPPEN
[03:20:36] AGAIN AND BEFORE YOU
[03:20:38] GET STARTED, MADAM CLERK DO YOU MIND
[03:20:39] STATING THE NEXT THREE
[03:20:43] NAMES?
[03:20:44] >> ABSOLUTELY. MARION PEARL, MARIA HOSS
[03:20:45] AND EZRA COHEN.
[03:20:49] >> MY NAME IS LUKE BALKHAGAN AND LIVED
[03:20:50] IN HERMOSA BEACH ALL MY
[03:20:54] LIFE AND THE TOWN IS BUILT AROUND ONE
[03:20:55] THING THE BEACH.
[03:20:58] KEEPING THE BEACH CLEAN IS HARD. MOST
[03:20:59] OPTIONS ARE NOT COST
[03:21:01] EFFECTIVE, NOT PERMANENT OR TOO
[03:21:02] EXPENSIVE. IN THE SITUATION
[03:21:05] WE IS A CHANCE TO DO SOMETHING PERMANENT
[03:21:06] AND HOPEFULLY AT
[03:21:08] SOUTH PARK. UNFORTUNATELY THERE IS
[03:21:09] CONCERNS ABOUT THE
[03:21:13] INFILTRATION PROJECT AND THERE IS
[03:21:14] CONCERN CONSTRUCTION MAY BE
[03:21:16] TEMPORARY INCONVENIENT AND WE MISS THE
[03:21:17] CHANCE TO HAVE A SAFER
[03:21:20] AND CLEANER BEACH AND CITY AS A WHOLE.
[03:21:21] NOT ONLY HAS THE CITY
[03:21:25] RECEIVED GRANTS TO CONSTRUCT THE STORM
[03:21:26] DRAIN WHICH FILTERS OUT
[03:21:29] POTENTIALLY HARMFUL DEBRIS AND RUN OFF,
[03:21:30] BUT ALSO IF WE DONT
[03:21:35] BUILD IT WILL BE FINED UP TO $37
[03:21:36] THOUSAND A DAY AND THE
[03:21:39] MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY WILL BE FORCED
[03:21:40] TO FOOT THE BILL IF
[03:21:42] THE DRAIN ISN'T CONSTRUCTED UNLESS
[03:21:43] ANOTHER SOLUTION IS FOUND.
[03:21:48] THERE ARE COMPLAINTS ABOUT TRAFFIC IT IS
[03:21:49] IMPORTANT TO
[03:21:51] RECOGNIZE THE AREA SURROUNDING SOUTH
[03:21:52] PARK HAS LITTLE TRAFFIC
[03:21:55] AS IS AND MANY ROUTES EXIST. THE
[03:21:56] CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES COMING
Page 54 of 94
[03:21:59] TO AND FRO FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE
[03:22:00] AND SINCE THE ROAD MAY
[03:22:05] BE SHUT DOWN DURING CONSTRUCTION CARS
[03:22:06] MAY NOT BE DRIVING ON
[03:22:08] THE ROAD DURING CONSTRUCTION INSTEAD
[03:22:09] THERE WILL BE TRUCKS AND
[03:22:11] MAY BE LESS TRUCKS ON THE ROAD THEN CARS
[03:22:12] SO URGE ALL YOU TO
[03:22:16] MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION. HELP PRESERVE A
[03:22:17] BEAUTIFUL BEACH AND
[03:22:21] WONDERFUL COMMUNITY. THERE WILL BE
[03:22:22] SACRIFICE EITHER WAY. ON
[03:22:24] ONE SIDE CONSTRUCTION AND INCONVENIENCE
[03:22:25] BUT GET A CLEANER AND
[03:22:28] SAFER BEACH, ON THE OTHER SIDE MAY HAVE
[03:22:29] TO PAY A HUGE BAY
[03:22:31] DAILY WHILE RECEIVING NOTHING IN RETURN.
[03:22:32] MAKE THE RIGHT
[03:22:35] CHOICE. THANK YOU.
[03:22:36] >> THANK YOU, LUKE. NEXT UP. GO AHEAD
[03:22:37] MARION.
[03:22:46] >> GOOD EVENING. MARION PEARL, I LIVE ON
[03:22:47] 447, 2 STREET. I
[03:22:54] SPENT ALL DAY NOT GOING TO WORK READING
[03:22:55] ALL THE COMMENTS,
[03:22:58] PUTTING SOMETHING ON AND THEN TONIGHT I
[03:22:59] HEAR-I WANT TO RECAP
[03:23:04] WHAT I HEAR TODAY AND IN THE PAST FROM
[03:23:05] THE CITY COUNCIL AND
[03:23:09] MRS. MORRIS. BASICALLY 2013, 14, 15
[03:23:10] THERE HAD TO BE
[03:23:15] INFILTRATION PROJECT TO CLEAN THE OCEAN,
[03:23:16] WHICH IS GREAT, HAS
[03:23:19] TO BE DONE. THE CITY FROM REDONDO BEACH,
[03:23:20] TORRANCE HERMOSA
[03:23:24] BEACH WERE SITTING TOGETHER IN 2012, 13,
[03:23:25] 14. REDONDO BEACH 50
[03:23:31] PERCENT STORMWATER GOING DOWN THE DRAIN.
[03:23:32] TORRANCE OVER 30
[03:23:36] PERCENT, HERMOSA BEACH, 10 PERCENT.
[03:23:37] REDONDO BEACH SAY THEN WE
[03:23:43] HAVE TOO MUCH ON OUR PLATE, WITH WHY
[03:23:44] DONT YOU HERMOSA BEACH
[03:23:47] YOU GOT A NICE GREEN BELT, TWO FOOTBALL
[03:23:48] FIELDS, 2 MILLION 400
[03:23:55] THOUSAND GALLONS CAN INJECT IN THERE,
[03:23:56] THIS IS DONE DEAL. YOU
Page 55 of 94
[03:23:59] TAKE IT ON, WE HAVE VAST LAND OVER 50
[03:24:00] PERCENT OUR STORMWATER,
[03:24:06] WE HAVE TOO MUCH ON THE PLATE. WHY DONT
[03:24:07] YOU DO IT, WE GIVE
[03:24:11] YOU THE GRANT AND THAT IS HOW THIS MOU
[03:24:12] STARTED. THE HERMOSA
[03:24:15] BEACH CITY COUNCIL SAY, YEAH, WE JUST
[03:24:16] SETTLED WITH THIS WHOLE
[03:24:20] THING AND HAVE NOTHING TO DO, LET'S DO
[03:24:21] IT. WE SIGN A MOU. 2
[03:24:29] MILLION 400 GALLONS OF STORMWATER INJECT
[03:24:30] IF INTO THE GREEN
[03:24:33] BELT, IT PROBABLY ISN'T A BIG DEAL.
[03:24:34] MARCH 2018 WE GOT THE
[03:24:39] FIRST LETTER, WE ALL WOKE UP TO IT, WE
[03:24:40] HAVE [INAUDIBLE
[03:24:45] COMMENTS] LIVING AT THE GREEN BELT WHAT
[03:24:46] [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS]
[03:24:48] INVESTIGATED. THE WATER LEVEL IS TOO
[03:24:49] HIGH, SO I DON'T THINK
[03:24:51] ANY AGENCY WOULD PRESSURE ON YOU TO
[03:24:52] BUILD THIS WOULD WANT YOU
[03:24:56] TO GO FORWARD AND BUILD THIS WHICH IS
[03:24:57] FAULTY AND YOU WILL
[03:25:01] HAVE LAWSUITS IN THE FUTURE GOING ON SO
[03:25:02] I THINK THAT'S WHY MS
[03:25:08] MAYOR AND YOU ALREADY SAW THAT AND YOU
[03:25:09] SAY NO, LET'S NOT DO
[03:25:12] IT. LET'S WAKE UP TO THAT. THERE IS NO
[03:25:13] SPACE FOR THIS BIG
[03:25:18] PROJECT ON THE GREEN BELT OR SOUTH PARK.
[03:25:19] WE HAVE TO TELL
[03:25:23] REDONDO IT IS MOSTLY YOUR WATER, YOU GOT
[03:25:24] THOSE VAST PIECE OF
[03:25:29] LAND, YOU TAKE CARE OF IT. THAT'S ALL.
[03:25:30] THANK YOU.
[03:25:35] >> THANK YOU.
[03:25:51] >> I LIKE TO THANK THE HERMOSA BEACH
[03:25:52] SUBCOMMITTEE, MAYOR, AND
[03:25:55] COUNCIL MEMBER FANGARY FOR TALKING TO
[03:25:56] REDONDO BEACH AND
[03:26:04] RECOMMENDING OPTION NUMBER 3. WE REALLY
[03:26:05] REALLY PROGNOSIS
[03:26:09] APPRECIATE THIS. I HOPE THE REST THE
[03:26:10] CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
[03:26:12] RECOMMEND OPTION 3 AS WELL. THE
[03:26:13] RESIDENTS OF HERMOSA BEACH WE
Page 56 of 94
[03:26:18] HAVE BEEN FIGHTING THE STORMWATER
[03:26:19] PROJECT FOR ONE WHOLE YEAR.
[03:26:24] A PROJECT OF THIS MAGNITUDE SHOULD HAVE
[03:26:25] BEEN RESEARCHED
[03:26:28] THOROUGHLY. SINCE THE VERY BEGINNING AND
[03:26:29] THE RESIDENTS SHOULD
[03:26:34] HAVE BEEN INFORMED AHEAD OF TIME AND
[03:26:35] EVERYBODY KNOWS WE HAVE
[03:26:37] BEEN REPEATING THESE OVER AND OVER AND
[03:26:38] OVER BUT I THINK WE ARE
[03:26:41] FINALLY REACHING TO THE POINT WHERE
[03:26:42] HOPEFULLY YOU GUYS
[03:26:45] RECOMMEND OPTION NUMBER 3. THANK YOU.
[03:26:52] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE HAVE ANOTHER
[03:26:53] NAME MENTIONED?
[03:26:56] >> YES, EZRA COHEN.
[03:26:58] >> GOOD EVENING.
[03:27:03] >> MY NAME IS EZRA COHEN AND I LIVED IN
[03:27:04] THE SOUTH BAY
[03:27:08] THROUGHOUT FOR THE LAST 7 OR 8 YEARS.
[03:27:09] SO, THERE ARE MANY
[03:27:13] DISASTER CONSEQUENCES IF THE CITY
[03:27:14] COUNCIL CHOOSES TO IMPLEMENT
[03:27:19] OPTION NUMBER 3 AS THE CITY LAWYER HAS
[03:27:20] SAID BEFORE. FIRST OF
[03:27:23] ALL, THE GRANT MONEY EXPIRES ON APRIL 1
[03:27:24] AND WE HAVE THE GRANT
[03:27:27] MONEY RIGHT NOW. BY REFUSING TO
[03:27:28] IMPLEMENT THIS PROGRAM IN
[03:27:32] EFFORT OF THE GREEN BELT OR SOUTH PARK,
[03:27:33] WE WILL WILLINGLY GIVE
[03:27:37] UP THE GRANT MONEY THAT WAS A ONCE IN A
[03:27:38] LIFE TIME THING THAT
[03:27:39] HERMOSA BEACH CAN IMPLEMENT TO HELP PUT
[03:27:40] IN MUCH NEEDED
[03:27:45] INFILTRATION SYSTEM. WE ARE MADE TO
[03:27:46] REPAY THE OTHER BEACH
[03:27:50] CITIES FOR THE MONEY THEY HAVE GIVEN US,
[03:27:51] WHICH COULD AMOUNT TO
[03:27:54] INNUMERABLE COSTS NO CALCULATED YET.
[03:27:55] OPTION 3 RESTS UPON THE
[03:28:00] FACT OF FRANCISCO STREET AS A POSSIBLE
[03:28:01] PLACE BUT REDONDO BEACH
[03:28:09] HASN'T APPROVED FRANCISCA STREET AND
[03:28:10] MOST LIKELY WILL NOT BE
[03:28:13] APPROVED BECAUSE OF CONTAMINATION. WE
[03:28:14] MUST APPROVE OPTION 1
Page 57 of 94
[03:28:20] OR 2 AND OPTION 1 ISN'T FEASIBLE BECAUSE
[03:28:21] OF THE PEOPLE IN THE
[03:28:28] ROOM THAT LIVE MERE IT. WE MUST USE
[03:28:29] SOUTH PARK. I KNOW
[03:28:32] PEOPLE IN THE ROOM FROM SOUTH PARK
[03:28:33] AGAINST THE PROPOSAL AND
[03:28:35] THERE ISN'T WIDE SPREAD DISAPPROVAL OF
[03:28:36] SOUTH PARK. SOUTH PARK
[03:28:41] MIGHT NOT BE THE MOST DESIRABLE LOCATION
[03:28:42] BECAUSE OF THE
[03:28:44] PLAYGROUND AND PARK, THE CONSEQUENCES OF
[03:28:45] NOT PUTTING IN OPTION
[03:28:48] 1 OR 2 ARE MUCH WORSE. BY 2021 WE HAVE
[03:28:49] TO PAY $37 THOUSAND A
[03:28:56] DAY BECAUSE OF THE FEDERAL CLEAN WATER
[03:28:57] ACT SO WE MUST
[03:28:59] IMPLEMENT SOUTH PARK, IT IS WIDE OPEN
[03:29:00] SPACE THAT IS A GREAT
[03:29:02] PLACE TO PUT THIS AND LIKE THE ENGINEER
[03:29:03] HAD SAID EARLIER, WE
[03:29:06] COULD SPREAD IT OUT TO DIFFERENT
[03:29:07] LOCATIONS SO WE MUST
[03:29:10] IMPLEMENT SOUTH PARK.
[03:29:17] >> JAVIER HAAS AND BRIAN HILLGERS.
[03:29:27] >> THANK YOU. MARK, YOU ARE UP.
[03:29:31] >> JAVIER.
[03:29:42] >> EVENING.
[03:29:44] >> GOOD EVENING. I'M JAVIER HAAS. WE ARE A COMMUNITY THAT
[03:29:54] HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS FOR A YEAR. WE WEREN'T NOTIFIED.
[03:30:05] EVERYBODY KEEPS WONDERING WHY WEREN'T WE NOTIFIED SOONER ABOUT
[03:30:10] THIS PROJECT THE. I'M HEARING DATES GOING BACK TO 2010, 2011,
[03:30:16] 2012, 2013. IT IS 2019 NOW. I FOUND OUT ABOUT IT AND WE FOUND
[03:30:23] OUT ABOUT IT MARCH 28TH, 2019, A YEAR WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON
[03:30:31] THIS. THERE WASN'T SUFFICIENT TRANSPARENCY. WE RESEARCHED AND
[03:30:43] LOOKED AT THIS A LOT OF TIME AND EFFORT ON OUR TIME AND OUR DIME.
[03:30:47] WHAT WE WOULD LIKE IS OPTION NO. 3. WE REALLY APPRECIATE, AGAIN,
[03:30:53] COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY AND ARMATO'S EFFORTS RESEARCHING AS WELL ON
[03:31:03] THEIR OWN. RESEARCHING AS A COMMUNITY. WE ARE A BIG PART OF THE
[03:31:07] ENVIRONMENT. WE NEED TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT AND NEED AN
[03:31:12] INFILTRATION PROJECT. IN MY OPINION SOUTH PARK DOESN'T MAKE
[03:31:17] SENSE TOO CLOSE TO PEOPLE AND GREENBELT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE
[03:31:20] EITHER. IT IS TOO CLOSE TO PEOPLE. WE HAVE TO HAVE AN
[03:31:24] INFILTRATION PROJECT MY HOPE AND PRAYERS ARE WITH FRANCISCA.
[03:31:29] THAT IS, AGAIN, WHAT WE HAVE BEEN PUSHING FOR. I'M GRATEFUL FOR
[03:31:33] REDONDO BEACH PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN INVOLVED CITY COUNCIL PEOPLE
[03:31:38] AND MAYOR BRAND AS FAR AS THAT. I'M SURE YOU HEARD THE RESPONSE
[03:31:42] FROM THE PEOPLE WHO ARE HEARTENED. WE ARE HEARTENED BY ALL OF
Page 58 of 94
[03:31:46] THAT WORK. OPTION NO. 3, THAT WOULD WORK THE BEST. AND I THINK,
[03:31:51] IN OUR OPINION, AND IN THE OPINION OF MANY OTHER PEOPLE. THANK
[03:31:55] YOU SO MUCH.
[03:31:56] >> THANK YOU, BRIAN?
[03:32:02] >> I FEEL LIKE JOHNNY CASH.
[03:32:05] >> THANK YOU FOR HAVING THIS FORUM FOR US TO TALK AND
[03:32:09] COMMUNICATE ABOUT THINGS. I, FIRST OF ALL, WANT TO THANK THE
[03:32:13] FIRST RESPONDERS EVERY TIME. I LIKE THAT WITH MY MEETINGS HERE.
[03:32:17] IT IS MY THIRD MEETING COMING HERE AND GREAT JOB AT THE ST.
[03:32:23] PATRICK'S PARTY. CLYDESDALE WERE A HIT. I HEARD THINGS TODAY.
[03:32:31] I'M ASHAMED IT DIDN'T HAPPEN EARLIER. WE ARE LOOKING AT AN
[03:32:34] ALTERNATIVE SITE. UNTIL I HEARD THIS, I PUT IN MY NOTES YOU HAVE
[03:32:39] A+ ON CLYDESDALE. COLLECTIVELY, YOU GOT AN F ON WHAT WE ARE
[03:32:45] TRYING TO DO HERE AS A COMMUNITY. THIS IS THE THIRD TIME I HAVE
[03:32:47] BEEN HERE, AND I FEEL WE ARE FURTHER BEHIND TODAY THAN WE WERE
[03:32:51] LAST TIME. IT JUST BOTHERS ME ITSELF. WHEN I -- OUR LAST TIME
[03:32:56] WE WERE HERE, I WENT BACK AND LOTS OF THE FOLKS SAID THEY ARE
[03:32:59] LISTENING AND ASKING FOR LOCATIONS AND WHERE ELSE CAN WE DO
[03:33:03] ALTERNATIVES? A RED FLAG CAME ON TO ME. YOU KNOW WHAT? I
[03:33:07] NEGOTIATE PARTNERSHIPS AND MAJOR DEALS ALL THE TIME. I LOVE IT.
[03:33:11] APPEASEMENT NEGOTIATION ISSUE APPEASING THE OTHER SIDE. TELL US
[03:33:17] WHERE YOU LIKE TO BE. IT BUILDS TIME. THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE
[03:33:21] THE RIGHT OPPORTUNITY. MAYBE IT WAS TOTALLY LEGIT. I SAW
[03:33:25] SOMETHING THE LAST TWO WEEKS AGO. IT MADE ME RECYCLE EASY READER
[03:33:32] QUICKER THAN NORMAL. IT TALKED ABOUT DIFFERENT THINGS FOR THIS
[03:33:35] ARTICLE. THIS IS FOR OLYMPIC-SIZED SWIMMING POOLS UNDERGROUND.
[03:33:42] THIS IS HOLDING RAINWATER FROM EVERYWHERE. FIRST FLUSH IS THE
[03:33:49] LAST FLUSH. THAT IS WHY I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THIS CALLED A
[03:33:52] BROWN BELT. RESIDENTS CAN IMPEDE A PROJECT. A SPEED BUMP
[03:33:57] IMPEDES PEOPLE. WE HAVE TO WORK ON THIS TOGETHER NOT JUST HAVE
[03:34:01] US GET IN THE WAY. I HEARD GOOD THINGS TONIGHT BUT SURPRISED IT
[03:34:05] TOOK SO MUCH LONGER. ONE OTHER THING. THERE ISSUES ON F GRADE
[03:34:10] DURING WEATHER ON THE BEACH. THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE. WE HAVE TO
[03:34:14] DO THAT. IRONICALLY, THE FIRST TIME I WAS AT THE MEETING, THERE
[03:34:17] WAS TWO AREAS FOR AN F MEETING FOR AN F ON THE BEACH. SOUTH
[03:34:22] REDONDO AND 28 MANHATTAN BEACH. WE HAVE TO FIX THIS UP. LET'S
[03:34:28] NOT TRY TO BE LIKE A BRILLIANT POLITICIAN RIGHT NOW THROWING OUT
[03:34:33] ONE IDEA AND SCARING THE WORLD. WE WON'T BE DEAD IN 12 YEARS.
[03:34:39] LET'S FIGURE IT OUT THE RIGHT WAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[03:34:42] >> YAY.
[03:34:43] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MADAM CLERK?
[03:34:46] >> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. I HAVE SEVERAL CARDS HERE WHERE
[03:34:50] PEOPLE INDICATED OR CHECKED THAT THEY EITHER OPPOSED OR SUPPORTED
[03:34:55] THIS ITEM, BUT THEY DID NOT WISH TO SPEAK BUT I THINK THE CARDS
[03:35:00] MIGHT CONFUSE A FEW PEOPLE. SO COULD I ASK THAT THOSE PEOPLE,
[03:35:06] ANY OF THEM WHO DO WANT TO SPEAK COME UP AND JUST LET ME KNOW?
[03:35:10] >> WELL, HOLD ON ONE SECOND. I CAN ASK OUR CITY MANAGER OR
Page 59 of 94
[03:35:15] ATTORNEY IF SOMEONE DOESN'T WANT TO SPEAK BUT WROTE ON THE CARD
[03:35:21] DOES THE CLERK READ THAT INTO THE RECORD?
[03:35:25] >> I THINK MISUNDERSTOOD. THEY CHECKED OPPOSED OR SUPPORT
[03:35:29] UNDER IF THEY DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT THEY ACTUALLY DO WISH TO
[03:35:33] SPEAK.
[03:35:34] >> OKAY. SORRY.
[03:35:35] >> WE MIGHT HAVE TO CLARIFY THE CARD.
[03:35:37] >> YES. THANKS FOR THAT. READ OUT TO THE AUDIENCE.
[03:35:40] >> IF YOU WANT TO SPEAK, LET ME KNOW. ARCADIA KING,
[03:35:44] BARBARA ELLMAN, AND KATHY STEMIC, AND ETHAN MIBOO AND CAROL
[03:35:53] ANDREW O'KOWSKI.
[03:35:55] >> I DIDN'T WANT TO SPEAK.
[03:35:57] >> ALL RIGHT. SO --
[03:35:58] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[03:35:59] >> IF WE CALLED YOUR NAME, PLEASE STEP UP TO THE MICROPHONE
[03:36:02] AND GO AHEAD.
[03:36:03] >> IN THE MEANTIME, SHALL I CALL THE NEXT FORWARD, PLEASE?
[03:36:07] >> YES, PLEASE. STEP FORWARD WHILE WE DO THAT.
[03:36:10] >> CHRIS PRENNER, RACHEL WALLACE, AND JESSICA GUHEEN.
[03:36:17] >> CITY COUNCIL, HI. KATHY STEMIC. I DON'T HAVE GLASSES
[03:36:23] AND DIDN'T SEE WHAT I CHECKED OFF BUT SAW OPPOSED LOUDLY AND
[03:36:27] CLEARLY THIS FAR AWAY. I DIDN'T PLAN ON SPEAKING TONIGHT. I
[03:36:31] APOLOGIZE FOR ALL OF THIS. THE MAIN THING I WANT TO SAY IS THAT,
[03:36:34] ACTUALLY, I BELIEVE IN YOU. YOU KNOW HOW I FEEL. YOU KNOW HOW
[03:36:39] WE FEEL. BUT I ACTUALLY BELIEVE IN YOU MORESO TONIGHT THAN I DID
[03:36:45] SIX WEEKS AGO OR SIX MONTHS AGO AND A YEAR AGO.
[03:36:48] I UNDERSTAND THAT WE NEED TO SHARE THE BURDEN. CHRISTY
[03:36:54] SPOKE ABOUT THAT. THOSE WERE KEY WORDS I HEARD TONIGHT.
[03:36:58] SHARING, COMPROMISING. WE CAN'T CARRY ALL OF THIS BURDEN. WE
[03:37:02] ALL WANT CLEAN WATER, OF COURSE WE DO. WE LOVE OUR OCEAN AND OUR
[03:37:08] CITY. I REALLY BELIEVE THAT IF WE DISSOLVE THIS, THAT YOU ALL
[03:37:12] HAVE THE POWER TO GO AND NEGOTIATE FOR US. LOOK. WE HAVE A BAD
[03:37:17] DEAL. WE CAN ALL ADMIT THAT. IT JUST ISN'T A GOOD DEAL, BUT YOU
[03:37:22] GUYS CAN GO BACK AND RENEGOTIATE FOR US.
[03:37:25] I -- I FULLY BELIEVE THAT. WITH FRANCISCA, THEY CAN CARRY
[03:37:31] WHAT? 70 OR 80% OF THAT BURDEN, AND WE TAKE 20 OR 25% OF IT? I
[03:37:37] THINK WE MIGHT BE OKAY WITH THAT. WE CAN'T CARRY 100% OF THE
[03:37:42] BURDEN. WE CAN TALK ABOUT MONEY AND RAMIFICATIONS AND GRANTS. I
[03:37:47] FIND GRANT MONEY FOR A LIVING. THAT IS WHAT I DO FOR COLLEGE NOT
[03:37:51] THIS BIG OF A SCALE, BUT THE MONEY IS OUT THERE. IT DOES GET
[03:37:55] REPLENISHED. THERE WILL BE MORE MONEY FOR US, AND WE DO HAVE
[03:37:58] PEOPLE UP IN SACRAMENTO THAT WILL FIGHT FOR US. YOU HAVE TO
[03:38:02] FIGHT FOR US NOW. I KNOW YOU CAN DO IT. I FULLY BELIEVE IT.
[03:38:06] YOU HAVE THE POWER TO RENEGOTIATE FOR US, SO JUST PLEASE VOTE FOR
[03:38:11] NO. 3 AND GO IN AND TAKE SOME NAMES AND RENEGOTIATE FOR US. YOU
[03:38:16] GUYS CAN DO IT. THANK YOU.
[03:38:17] >> THANK YOU. CHRIS GRUNTER.
Page 60 of 94
[03:38:22] >> I WOULD LIKE TO JUST SAY ECHO WHAT SHE SAID RIGHT THERE.
[03:38:30] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[03:38:31] >> SHE SAID IT REALLY WELL. I'M NOT SURE HOW THIS PROJECT
[03:38:34] CAME SO FAR DOWN THIS PATH WITH HERMOSA BEARING THE FULL WEIGHT
[03:38:40] OF THE PLACEMENT OF THE LOCATION OF THIS PROJECT BEING ALL IN
[03:38:45] HERMOSA WHEN WE HAVE SO LITTLE SPACE. IT JUST DOESN'T SEEM TO
[03:38:50] MAKE SENSE CONSIDERING HOW MUCH THE OTHER CITIES ARE CONTRIBUTING
[03:38:59] IN TERMS OF THEIR WASTE WATER. BUT I DO REALLY THINK THAT IF WE
[03:39:06] CAN GO WITH OPTION 3, THEN YOU GUYS HAVE PUT TOGETHER WITH MAYOR
[03:39:13] BRAND, THAT WOULD BE THE BEST OPTION FOR US TO MOVE THIS ALONG
[03:39:18] AND TRY AND TAKE AWAY THIS HUGE INDUSTRIAL PROJECT THAT SEEMS TO
[03:39:24] BE COMING BACK TO SOUTH HERMOSA EVERY FEW YEARS IN SOME FORM OR
[03:39:31] ANOTHER. THAT WOULD BE GREAT. I WOULD URGE YOU TO VOTE FOR THE
[03:39:34] OPTION 3 AND SEE IF WE CAN NEGOTIATE A -- SOMETHING THAT WILL
[03:39:42] WORK BETTER FOR OUR CITY AND FOR OUR RESIDENTS. THANK YOU.
[03:39:46] >> THANK YOU, CHRIS. RACHEL?
[03:39:51] >> HI. SO I'M ONE OF THE FAMILIES THAT MY FRONT DOOR AND
[03:39:57] BEDROOM WINDOW IS DIRECTLY ON THE GREENBELT. WHERE YOU ARE
[03:40:00] SITTING IS WHERE THE PROPOSED MACHINERY WILL START, AND I WILL
[03:40:04] WAKE UP TO THAT EVERY MORNING. MY HUSBAND WORKS FROM HOME
[03:40:08] TWO DAYS A WEEK. I HAVE THREE LITTLE KIDS. I'M IMPACTED AND
[03:40:12] WILL BE IMPACTED IN MY HOME AND MY CHILDREN GO TO SCHOOL WITH
[03:40:15] SOME OF YOU AND CHILDREN GO TO SCHOOL WITH A LOT OF THE RESIDENTS
[03:40:19] IN THE COMMUNITY. I FEEL VERY STRONGLY ABOUT THIS. I'M VERY
[03:40:23] CONCERNED ABOUT THE NEXT GENERATION. I'M NOT HERE FOR MY
[03:40:26] INTEREST BUT MY CHILDREN'S INTEREST AS WELL. A GREAT
[03:40:29] INFILTRATION PROJECT. IN A SENSE, WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING TO
[03:40:32] CLEAN OUT THE WATER. WEIR HAS BEEN PROPOSED. I URGE THE OTHERS
[03:40:39] TO PLEASE CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDATION. WE DON'T AGREE WITH THE
[03:40:43] TWO LOCATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN SUGGESTED. OUTSIDE MY FRONT DOOR IS
[03:40:47] NOT OKAY AND THE SACRIFICE MY FAMILY WILL HAVE TO MAKE FOR THAT
[03:40:51] TO HAPPEN IS SIMPLY IMPOSSIBLE. SOUTH PARK, I CAN TELL YOU AS
[03:40:56] MOTHER OF TWO NINE-YEAR OLDS AND A FOUR-YEAR OLD, I CAN'T TAKE
[03:41:00] THEM TO SOUTH PARK AND LET THEM RUN FREELY ON THE PLAYGROUND WITH
[03:41:05] HUGE TRUCKS AND A CONSTRUCTION SITE NEXT TO ME. THAT IS
[03:41:10] NEGLIGENT AS A MOTHER. IF I'M ON TOP OF MY KIDS AT THE PARK,
[03:41:16] IT'S NO FUN FOR ME OR THEM. -- GOOD NEIGHBOR NEWBORN NURSERY IS
[03:41:25] ON THE GREENBELT. WE ARE THINKING ABOUT THE NEXT GENERATION. I
[03:41:28] COME FROM NEW ZEALAND. WE ARE VERY BIG ON THE ENVIRONMENT THERE.
[03:41:33] ONE OF MY QUESTIONS FOR YOU TO CONSIDER IS WITH THE FRANCISCA
[03:41:37] SITE. IT IS ABOUT CLEANING UP THE CONTAMINATION. I KNOW IT IS
[03:41:41] SOMETHING WE HAVE DONE IN NEW ZEALAND AND DO, DO. I DON'T THINK
[03:41:45] CONTAMINATION SHOULD BE USED TO SCARE PEOPLE OFF USING THAT SITE
[03:41:49] AT ALL. IT SHOULD BE AN OPTION THAT SHOULD BE CLEARLY LOOKED AT.
[03:41:53] WE CAN CLEAN UP CONTAMINATION. IT WILL COST MORE AND THERE WILL
[03:41:57] BE CONS FOR THAT, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT, THAT SHOULD BE RULED
[03:42:03] OUT. I URGE YOU TO THINK ABOUT AS A PARENT IF I MAKE A MISTAKE
Page 61 of 94
[03:42:06] OR MY KIDS MAKE A MISTAKE, WE LEARN FROM THAT AND CHANGE COURSE.
[03:42:11] IF WE CONTINUE TO MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE, WE CAN SAY THAT WE ARE
[03:42:15] BOOKING A FOOL. THERE IS THAT SAYING THAT I UNDERSTAND THAT I
[03:42:19] FEEL A MISTAKE HAS BEEN MADE ABOUT THE SITES THAT HAVE BEEN
[03:42:22] CONSIDERED. I THINK YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CHANGE AND
[03:42:25] ADVOCATE AND FIGHT FOR US AND RENEGOTIATE AS THE LAST LADY SAID,
[03:42:30] TO MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION. I REALLY HOPE YOU GUYS CAN DO THAT.
[03:42:34] THANK YOU.
[03:42:35] >> THANK YOU, RACHEL.
[03:42:36] >> JESSICA. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE THE NEXT 3, MADAME
[03:42:49] CLERK? YOU WANT YOUR HUSBAND TO DO IT IN YOUR PLACE?
[03:42:52] >> NO. [INDISCERNIBLE].
[03:42:54] >> ALL RIGHT. ADAM, YOU CAN STEP UP TO SPEAK, IF YOU WOULD
[03:42:58] LIKE. PLEASE ALLOW THE CLERK TO NAME OFF THE NEX T THREE NAMES.
[03:43:03] >> SURE. JESSICA WORSHICK, JOHN GARDNER, AND RON ELLMAN.
[03:43:10] >> I WILL WAIT.
[03:43:11] >> YOU WANT TO WAIT?
[03:43:12] >> YEAH.
[03:43:13] >> JESSICA, THE OTHER JESSICA. JESSICA WITH A K.
[03:43:17] [LAUGHING].
[03:43:20] >> GOOD EVENING.
[03:43:21] >> GOOD EVENING.
[03:43:22] >> WOW. I HAVE THOUGHT SO MUCH ABOUT THIS AND WRITTEN SO
[03:43:25] MANY NOTES. I WANT TO START OUT BY SAYING THANK YOU SO MUCH TO
[03:43:28] THE COUNCILMEMBERS WHO TOOK THE TIME TO COME TO SOUTH PARK AND
[03:43:32] MEET WITH SOME OF US OVER THE PAST WEEKEND AND HAVE TAKEN OUR
[03:43:36] MANY PHONE CALLS. IT IS SO AMAZING TO HEAR THAT, THAT WAS
[03:43:41] IMPACTFUL FOR YOU. WE HAVE BEEN LIVING WITH THIS FOR A YEAR. I
[03:43:44] WILL SAY WHEN I GOT THE STAFF REPORT LAST FRIDAY, IT WAS LIKE
[03:43:48] GROUND HOG DAY ALL OVER AGAIN. WE WERE HERE A YEAR AGO. THE
[03:43:52] PUBLIC CLEARLY DOES NOT SUPPORT IT IN SOUTH PARK OR THE
[03:43:58] GREENBELT. WE HAVE SPENT A YEAR EXAMINING THIS. NOW WE ARE BACK
[03:44:01] HERE AT SQUARE 1. I DO THINK, IN TALKING WITH SO MANY OF MY
[03:44:05] NEIGHBORS, THAT THEY WOULD SUPPORT SEVERAL SMALLER PROJECTS,
[03:44:10] OPTION 3. WE ARE ALL IN FAVOR OF CLEAN OCEANS. NO ONE DOES NOT
[03:44:15] WANT UNCLEAN OCEANS. I TAKE A FRONT TO THE FACT PEOPLE STAND UP
[03:44:20] HERE AND SAY WE ARE OPPOSED TO CLEAN BEACHES AND WATER. WE LOVE
[03:44:24] OUR LITTLE CITY AND WANT TO KEEP IT WITH THE SAME CHARACTER IT
[03:44:28] HAS, BUT SEEING THAT STAFF REPORT WAS SO ALARMING. WHAT WE HAVE
[03:44:32] HEARD FOR A YEAR IS THAT WE ARE SO SORRY AS THE COUNCIL AND STAFF
[03:44:36] THAT WE HAVE NOT BEEN FULLY TRANSPARENT. WE ARE GOING TO DO
[03:44:39] EVERYTHING IN OUR POWER TO BE MORE TRANSPARENT. I HAVE READ THAT
[03:44:43] IN THE EASY READER AND HEARD THAT AT EVERY MEETING I HAVE
[03:44:46] ATTENDED AND YET IT HAS BEEN RADIO SILENCE FROM STAFF TO SEE
[03:44:51] SOUTH PARK IS SUDDENLY THIS RECOMMENDED SITE WHEN THERE HAVE NOT
[03:44:56] BEEN ANY STUDIES DONE AT SOUTH PARK AND NO INFORMATION GATHERED.
[03:45:00] EVEN WHEN THE LOCATION WAS GREENBELT, YOU HAD TETRO TECH OUT
Page 62 of 94
[03:45:03] THERE AND COUNCIL AND STAFF OUT THERE AND YOU DID A FULL
[03:45:06] PRESENTATION TO LET THE PEOPLE KNOW. NONE OF THAT HAS BEEN DONE
[03:45:09] AT SOUTH PARK. IT HAS JUST NOT BEEN EXAMINED AS A SITE. WE JUST
[03:45:14] FOUND OUT TODAY THAT REDONDO, RIGHT BEFORE YOU GOT HERE, THAT
[03:45:18] THEY ARE WILLING TO TALK TO US. THEY ARE WILLING TO HAVE
[03:45:21] DIALOGUE WITH US. THEY ARE WILLING TO MAYBE TAKE ON PART OF T HE
[03:45:24] PROJECT. ISN'T THAT WORTH EXPLORING? I FEEL WHEN YOU GUYS LOOK
[03:45:28] OUT HERE AT US, ALL YOU ARE SEEING OR WHAT WE HAVE HEARD FOR THE
[03:45:33] PAST YEAR, YOU SEE DOLLAR SIGNS. WE HEAR GRANT MONEY AND $37,000
[03:45:38] A DAY WE MIGHT POTENTIALLY GET FINED TWO YEARS DOWN THE ROAD. WE
[03:45:43] DON'T KNOW THAT WILL HAPPEN AND THAT WE CAN'T WORK WITH REDONDO
[03:45:48] TO COME UP WITH SMALLER PROJECTS AND SHARE THIS BURDEN AND CHANGE
[03:45:51] THAT AROUND AND THAT WE CAN STILL MEET THAT DEADLINE. I KNOW
[03:45:55] LOTS OF PEOPLE HAVE REACHED OUT TO ELEANOR SUCHI'S OFFICE AND
[03:46:01] THEY TOLD EVERYONE THEY WILL BE ABLE TO WORK WITH US. I IMPLORE
[03:46:05] YOU TO EXHAUST ALL OPTIONS. JESSICA GUHEEN SAID THIS SO WELL THE
[03:46:10] OTHER NIGHT. HAVE YOU EXHAUSTED ALL OPTIONS BEFORE YOU PUT THIS
[03:46:14] CRAZY PROJECT, WHO KNOWS WHAT THE IMPACTS WILL BE, IN THE MIDDLE
[03:46:17] OF OUR AMAZING LITTLE TOWN? THANK YOU GUYS, AGAIN, FOR COMING
[03:46:21] DOWN TO SOUTH PARK AND MEETING WITH US AND TAKEN THE TIME YOU
[03:46:24] HAVE TAKEN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
[03:46:27] >> ALL RIGHT. I THINK WE HAD JOHN NEXT.
[03:46:30] >> GOOD EVENING. JOHN GARDNER HERE. THERE IS A REASON WHY
[03:46:35] WHITNEY HOUSTON SANG THE WORDS "I BELIEVE THAT THE YOUNG CHILDREN
[03:46:42] ARE OUR FUTURE." I THINK SHE SPOKE WITH WISDOM. I UNDERSTAND
[03:46:46] WHAT THEIR WORDS MEAN. THESE YOUNG PEOPLE HIT IT SPOT-ON. NO
[03:46:50] ONE WANTS THIS PROJECT, BUT IN THE END, WE HAVE TO SITE AN
[03:46:54] INFILTRATION PROJECT IN HERMOSA. THERE IS NO WAY AROUND IT. AS
[03:46:59] THE MAYOR STATED, WE HAVE TO SHARE OR CONTRIBUTE OUR -- TAKE CARE
[03:47:04] OF OUR BURDEN AT THE VERY LEAST; RIGHT? THERE IS NO WAY OTHER
[03:47:07] CITIES WILL SAY WE WILL TAKE THAT. NOW WE WILL TAKE HERMOSA'S
[03:47:12] SHARE, ESPECIALLY SINCE WE SIGNED THIS AGREEMENT. IT IS ONE WAY
[03:47:16] OR THE OTHER COME. BY THE TIME THIS THING IS ALL SAID AND DONE,
[03:47:19] WE HAVE TO SITE A PROJECT IN HERMOSA, WHICH IS THE BIG ONE
[03:47:25] HANDLING THE WHOLE LOAD FROM TORRANCE AND REDONDO OR SMALL ONE.
[03:47:30] JUST HERMOSA'S LOAD. THERE WILL BE A PROJECT IN HERMOSA BEACH.
[03:47:35] THERE IS NO TWO WAYS AROUND IT. WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT FROM THE
[03:47:38] PERSPECTIVE WHICH IS THE REALITY, YOU HAVE TO DETERMINE WHICH IS
[03:47:41] THE BEST SITE IN HERMOSA TO SITE THIS PROJECT. WE HAVE TO DO IT
[03:47:45] ANYWAY REGARDLESS. REALLY, THE ONLY OBVIOUS LOCATION AS YOUNG
[03:47:50] PEOPLE POINTED OUT IS SOUTH PARK. I DON'T LIKE THIS ANYMORE THAN
[03:47:53] ANYONE ELSE. AS ONE LADY SAID, WE HAVE A BAD DEAL, BUT IT IS
[03:47:58] WHAT IT IS. WE WON'T BE ABLE TO GET OUT OF IT. WE SIGNED THIS
[03:48:01] AGREEMENT WITH ALL OF THE OTHER CITIES. NOT SURE EVERYONE
[03:48:04] UNDERSTANDS THAT, BUT EVERY CITY HAS TO AGREE TO LET US OUT OF
[03:48:08] THIS -- THE FACT WE SITED THIS PROJECT. THAT MEANS TORRANCE AND
[03:48:14] REDONDO AND MANHATTAN BEACH AND LA COUNTY FLOOD DISTRICT ALL HAVE
Page 63 of 94
[03:48:19] TO SAY, OH, YEAH. WE WILL LET YOU NEGOTIATE WITH REDONDO BEACH
[03:48:24] NO INDICATION THAT TORRANCE OR LA COUNTY OR MANHATTAN BEACH HAS
[03:48:30] NO INDICATION OF LETTING HERMOSA OUT OF IT. IN REALITY, THEY
[03:48:34] WON'T LET THEM OUT OF IT. HERMOSA IS THE OUTFALL. WE WILL DO
[03:48:39] IT. THEY WILL SAY YOU RENEGED ON IT. IT IS YOUR PROBLEM. WE
[03:48:43] HAVE TO SITE THE PROJECT ANYWAY OR BE COMPLETELY, YOU KNOW, OVER
[03:48:47] JUST, YOU KNOW, TOTALLY, TOTALLY SCREWED. WE CAN'T KICK THIS
[03:48:51] DOWN THE ROAD ANY FURTHER. THERE HAS TO BE A PROJECT IN HERMOSA
[03:48:55] ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. SOUTH PARK IS REALLY THE ONLY LOGICAL
[03:48:59] CHOICE. ALL THESE PROJECTS GO IN PARKS BECAUSE PARKS PROVIDE THE
[03:49:03] NECESSARY SPACE THAT YOU NEED TO CONSTRUCT A PROJECT OF THIS
[03:49:08] SITE.
[03:49:09] SO -- AGAIN, WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF TIME. RIGHT? TWO YEARS
[03:49:12] BEFORE THIS THING HAS TO BE DONE AND TAKES A YEAR TO CONSTRUCT
[03:49:15] THIS THING AND YOU HAVE TO DO OTHER STUDIES. NO USE IN KICKING
[03:49:19] THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD FURTHER. WE HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION AND
[03:49:22] MAKE THE RIGHT ONE. IT HAS TO BE AT SOUTH PARK. THANK YOU FOR
[03:49:26] YOUR TIME.
[03:49:27] >> THANK YOU. IRA, GOOD EVENING.
[03:49:30] >> HELLO. IRA, HERMOSA BEACH. ANYBODY RUNNING FOR CITY
[03:49:36] COUNCIL MAY HAVE SECOND THOUGHTS AFTER SEEING THE DECISION PUT
[03:49:40] BEFORE YOU GUYS.
[03:49:41] THIS IS A TOUGH ONE. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT THE HERMOSA
[03:49:46] BEACH STAFF, I'M REALLY DISAPPOINTED WITH THE STAFF ON THIS
[03:49:50] PROJECT. THEY STARTED OFF BEING A CHEERLEADER FOR THE
[03:49:53] ILL-CONCEIVED GREENBELT PROJECT, AND NOW THEY MADE A U-TURN AND
[03:49:58] NOW THEY FAVOR SOUTH PARK. YOU CAN SEE THAT IN THE WAY THEY HAVE
[03:50:02] WRITTEN THE STAFF REPORT. IT IS ALL ABOUT SOUTH PARK AND DIDN'T
[03:50:07] SEEM AS IF THERE WAS ANY EVEN-HANDED ANALYSIS IN THERE AND IN THE
[03:50:11] WAY THEY PUT IT FORTH. TO GIVE YOU A FEW EXAMPLES, THEY SAID THE
[03:50:15] PROJECT WOULD TAKE A YEAR. WE AGREE THAT IS PROBABLY A VERY
[03:50:18] UNLIKELY PLAYGROUND AND THE COMMUNITY CENTER WOULD REMAIN OPEN
[03:50:23] 100% OPERATIONAL DURING THE CONSTRUCTION. THAT IS HIGHLY
[03:50:26] UNLIKELY. ONE LADY SAID PEOPLE WON'T LET THEIR KIDS PLAY THERE.
[03:50:30] NO MAIN ENTRANCE TO THE PARK. IT WILL PROBABLY BE USED FOR
[03:50:35] TRUCKS AS A STAGING AREA. DIRT WILL BE PILED UP TOWARDS WHERE
[03:50:39] THE SCHOOL OR IMAGINE THE SCHOOL FOLKS WILL PROBABLY HAVE TO
[03:50:42] LEAVE THE AREA. THEY TALK ABOUT NOISE THAT THEY WILL BUILD A
[03:50:49] FENCE. THAT IS GOING TO HELP NOISE. OKAY.
[03:50:52] THEY TALK ABOUT ODOR. THAT WE HEARD EARLIER 48 TO 72 HOURS
[03:50:57] OF ODOR IN THE FACILITY FROM STANDING WATER. IT IS HARD TO
[03:51:06] IMAGINE THAT WON'T HAVE TOXIC FLUID IN IT. THAT IS CAUSING THE
[03:51:11] ODOR FOR THAT LONG OF A PERIOD OF TIME.
[03:51:13] TO MAKE THIS PROJECT WORK AT SOUTH PARK, YOU HAVE TO IMAGINE
[03:51:17] WE TAKE TOXIC WATER. AS STAFF SAYS, IT HAS DISTINCT BACTERIA,
[03:51:22] COPPER, DDT, AND OTHER DANGEROUS CHEMICALS DIRECTED FROM STORM
[03:51:27] DRAIN MAKE A RIGHT TURN GO THROUGH PUMPING STATION AT GREENBELT
Page 64 of 94
[03:51:31] PUMP CAN'T BE ABOVE GROUND AS WE KNOW. THAT IS AGAINST THE RULES
[03:51:35] FOR THE GREENBELT AND PUMPING STATION WOULD HAVE TO BE NEAR
[03:51:39] SILENT LIKE 1 AT BOULEVARD PARK, WHICH IS NOISY IF ANYONE WENT ON
[03:51:44] THAT TOUR WOULD KNOW TOXIC WATER WOULD BE PIPED QUARTER OF MILE
[03:51:49] DOWN GREENBELT TO BE TORN UP IN THE PIPE. NOT SURE IT IS LEGAL.
[03:51:54] THEY ARE CALLING IT A SALT WATER BARRIER, WHICH IT IS NOT AND TO
[03:51:58] MAKE IT TO SOUTH PARK WHERE IT STARTS TO GET TREATED, AS I SAID,
[03:52:02] THE WATER STAYS FOR TWO TO THREE DAYS WITH AN ODOR, AND THEN WE
[03:52:07] HAVE TO DEAL WITH THAT AND THEN THE FILTERED WATER GOES DOWN INTO
[03:52:11] THE GROUND ASSUMING THERE IS ENOUGH ROOM BETWEEN THE GALLERY AND
[03:52:15] THE WATER TABLE. THERE IS RUMORS THAT OR INFORMATION OUT THERE
[03:52:21] THAT WATER, THERE IS NO ROOM FOR THAT OR VARIANCE. THAT WON'T
[03:52:25] HAPPEN. WE CAN'T HAVE A VARIANCE. SO IN ANY CASE, I RECOMMEND
[03:52:28] IN MY LAST FEW SECONDS THAT WE TAKE OPTION 3 AND FAVOR THE TASK
[03:52:33] FORCE AND THAT WE ALSO FORM A COMMUNITY GROUP AND BRING IN THE
[03:52:37] COMMUNITY TO ADD INPUT INTO THE PROCESS SO THAT WE CAN MAYBE COME
[03:52:41] UP WITH IDEAS. WE HAVE LOTS OF EXPERTS IN THE FIELD. I ALSO
[03:52:44] WOULD RECOMMEND READING, OF COURSE, CARLA VELTMAN'S LETTER.
[03:52:49] THANK YOU.
[03:52:50] >> THANK YOU, IRA. MADAME CLERK?
[03:52:53] >> NEXT, WE HAVE [INDISCERNIBLE]. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK
[03:52:59] BETH?
[03:53:00] >> YES.
[03:53:01] >> THANK YOU.
[03:53:02] >> FIRST OFF, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE COUNCIL FOR BEING
[03:53:04] HERE. I WOULD LIKE TO START OFF. I'M ETHAN MYBUR LIVING IN
[03:53:11] MANHATTAN BEACH. I EXPERIENCED THE PUBLIC AREAS AND GREENBELT
[03:53:15] AND PUBLIC PARKS AS MUCH AS EVERYONE HERE. I UNDERSTAND THAT
[03:53:20] MANY MAY BE IN OPPOSITION OF ILL-FOUNDED OF US KIDS, BUT WE MAKE
[03:53:26] UP A LARGE PORTION OF THE COMMUNITY THAT ENJOYS THE BEAUTY OF
[03:53:29] THIS TOWN AS WELL. THE FEATURE I ENJOY THE MOST AND MOST
[03:53:33] DEFINING FEATURE IS WORLD CLASS BEACHES OPTION 2 AT SOUTH PARK IS
[03:53:38] THE BEST SPOT FOR THE PROJECT THIS AREA WOULD INVOLVE MUCH LESS
[03:53:42] INTERFERENCE WITH THE PUBLIC THAN OTHER OPTIONS. WE SHOULD GO
[03:53:46] FORWARD WITH THIS SPOT. WE HAVE THE ABILITY ALREADY TO DO SO BUT
[03:53:49] JUST NEED THE OKAY. IF WE DON'T, FINANCIAL BURDENS COULD FACE
[03:53:53] THE ENTIRETY OF HERMOSA AND OTHER OPTIONS COULD CAUSE MONETARY
[03:53:59] SETBACKS WE FRANKLY DON'T NEED. MOVING TO REDONDO WOULD COME AT
[03:54:03] A COST OF NEAR $200,000 PAID BY HERMOSA BEACH AND MORE
[03:54:09] IMPORTANTLY FINES STARTING FROM WATER QUALITY IN 2021 COULD ADD
[03:54:13] UP TO $13.5 MILLION PER YEAR WE CAN ONLY EXPECT TO COME OUT OF
[03:54:17] THE TAXPAYERS POCKETS. THE FINANCIAL BURDEN THAT COMES WITH
[03:54:21] CANCELING THIS PROJECT IS SIMPLY TOO MUCH. I'M ON THE SURF TEAM
[03:54:27] AT MIRA COSA. I UNDERSTAND THE CURRENT PROBLEM WITH THE CURRENT
[03:54:33] DRAINAGE SYSTEM AS MUCH WHEN IT STANDS WHEN I GO IN THE WATER IN
[03:54:37] MORNING AND IT DOESN'T LOOK SMELL OR TASTE OKAY. I KNOW THERE IS
[03:54:41] DEFINITELY A PROBLEM WITH THIS. I UNDERSTAND WHERE EVERYONE IS
Page 65 of 94
[03:54:44] COMING FROM BUT CLEANLINESS OF OUR BEAUTIFUL BEACHES IS OF THE
[03:54:48] UTMOST IMPORTANCE. I'M PART OF A FAMILY AS WELL AND UNDERSTAND
[03:54:52] THE TEMPORARY STRUGGLE THIS PROJECT MAY CAUSE OTHERS, BUT I URGE
[03:54:56] YOU GUYS TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE LONG TERM BENEFITS OF GOING
[03:55:00] FORWARD WITH A PROJECT THAT WILL HELP AND HEAVILY OUTWEIGH THE
[03:55:04] MOMENTARY ISSUES THIS MAY CAUSE. THANK YOU.
[03:55:07] >> THANK YOU, ETHAN. BARBARA? GOOD EVENING.
[03:55:13] >> BARBARA ELLMAN, LOMA DRIVE. I THINK MY HUSBAND LEFT OUT
[03:55:20] ONE IMPORTANT PART. THAT WAS I WILL GO TO ANOTHER -- I WILL
[03:55:23] CHANGE DIRECTION AFTER THIS, BUT ONE OF THE THINGS WE WERE
[03:55:26] DISCUSSING IS THE FACT THAT THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE PARK
[03:55:31] WOULD NEED TO BE CLOSED IF THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH THE STANDING
[03:55:34] WATER AND THE SMELL. I LOOK AT THIS AS THIS IS THE EXACT SAME
[03:55:39] THING THAT WOULD HAPPEN WHEN THERE IS A BIG RAIN AND WE CLOSE THE
[03:55:43] BEACHES OR AT LEAST ADVISE THE SURFERS NOT TO GO IN WATER. ARE
[03:55:48] WE GOING TO PUT SIGNS UP AT THE PARK AND WARN FAMILIES THEY
[03:55:52] SHOULDN'T BE AT THE PARK FOR NEXT 48 TO 72 HOURS? I'M A
[03:55:56] GRANDMOTHER AND JEFF IS A GRANDMOTHER. YOU ARE ALL PARENTS THAT
[03:56:00] PARK. YOU KNOW WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. THESE KI DS PLAY AT
[03:56:03] THE PARK AND ROLL IN THE GRASS, OUR DOGS, ALL OF US. THIS IS --
[03:56:08] WE DON'T KNOW FOR SURE THAT THIS IS GOING TO HAPPEN. I TALKED TO
[03:56:12] JUSTIN ABOUT THIS AT A MEETING. THERE IS SO MUCH MAYBE THAT YOU
[03:56:17] HAVE TO DO BETTER THAN THAT. WE DESERVE BETTER THAN MAYBE. WE
[03:56:21] NEED MORE ANSWERS. I'M ASKING YOU TO REGROUP.
[03:56:24] WE TALKED ABOUT THIS EARLIER. BEFORE YOU STARTED A
[03:56:28] SUB-COMMITTEE OF HAVING A WORKING GROUP. I THINK IT IS
[03:56:32] EXTRAORDINARILY IMPORTANT THAT WE BRING EVERYBODY IN. WATERMAN
[03:56:36] AND WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENTALISTS AND LOCAL RESIDENTS AS WELL AS
[03:56:41] YOU. THERE IS WAY TOO MUCH GOING ON HERE. THE LACK OF
[03:56:46] COMMUNICATION IS STAGGERING. I DON'T WANT TO BE THE PERSON THAT
[03:56:48] LOOKS OVER AT SOMEONE LIKE CHRISTY AND SAY THIS IS YOUR FAULT.
[03:56:55] IT'S A HUGE PROJECT. WHEN IT MORPHED, JEFF IS STILL QUESTIONING
[03:56:59] WHAT HAPPENED BACK IN 2012, AND MIKE IS SAYING, WELL, MAYBE THIS
[03:57:05] IS GOING TO HAPPEN. THIS IS -- THIS IS NOT HOW WE WORK. THIS IS
[03:57:09] -- THIS IS HUGE. YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REGROUP. I HONESTLY
[03:57:13] BELIEVE THAT THE OPTION 3 ALLOWS US TO DO THAT, JUST TO REGROUP.
[03:57:20] I WANT TO TRUST THIS IS DONE RIGHT, BUT THE COMMUNICATION IS
[03:57:26] RIDICULOUS.
[03:57:27] EVEN MRS. MCGOWAN ADMITTED LAST YEAR THEY NEVER GAVE ANY
[03:57:35] THOUGHT TO THE HOMEOWNERS GOING TO BUILD ONE OF THE LARGEST
[03:57:38] PROJECTS IN THIS CITY, AND THEY WERE LOOKING AT THE GREENBELT AS
[03:57:42] BEING OPEN SPACE 15 FEET FROM SOMEONE'S FRONT DOOR. WE CAN DO
[03:57:47] BETTER THAN THIS. I REALLY HAVE FAITH. I'M GLAD THAT WE ARE ALL
[03:57:51] ABLE TO BE HERE TO DISCUSS THIS, BUT, AGAIN, I REALLY THINK A
[03:57:56] WORKING GROUP IS IN ORDER IF YOU ARE ABLE TO DO WHAT WE HOPE,
[03:58:00] WHICH IS TO GO WITH OPTION 3. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[03:58:03] >> THANK YOU. TAMMY? OH, IT IS CAMMIE NOT TAMMY.
Page 66 of 94
[03:58:10] >> I'M USED TO IT.
[03:58:12] >> [LAUGHING].
[03:58:13] >> THANK YOU FOR LISTENING TO ALL OF THE CONCERNS. I WILL
[03:58:18] SAY BECAUSE WE ALWAYS SAY THEY DON'T LISTEN OR CARE. NOW WE ARE
[03:58:22] HERE, SADLY CRAMMING IT ALL IN HERE IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS. I
[03:58:26] WILL SPEAK FOR THE PARKS SINCE THE KIDS THINK THAT PEOPLE ARE NOT
[03:58:30] SPEAKING FOR SOUTH PARK. I GO TO THE BEACH MORE THAN I GO TO
[03:58:34] SOUTH PARK. I HELPED GET SOUTH PARK TO WHERE IT IS TODAY, THE
[03:58:39] PLAYGROUND PIECE OF IT. SO I DO KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT AS
[03:58:46] FAR AS TIME AND GRANTS AND BEING ABLE TO EXTEND GRANTS OR BEING
[03:58:51] ABLE TO GET NEW GRANTS OR BEING ABLE TO TALK TO THE STATE OR A
[03:58:54] LOT OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE TO CHANGE THINGS AS THE COMMUNITY GIVES
[03:58:59] INPUT TO THINGS.
[03:59:00] I THINK GRASS AND TREES AND OPEN SPACE IS AS IMPORTANT AS
[03:59:06] THE BEACH. I THINK THAT SEVEN YEARS AGO, WHEN ALL OF THIS WAS
[03:59:13] GETTING DONE ON HERONDO AND BOTTOM OF HERONDO AND THE WALL WAS
[03:59:20] TORN OUT. OH, MY GOSH. THERE WAS NO DISCUSSION OF WHY COULDN'T
[03:59:23] IT HAVE GONE THERE? I KNOW THAT TIME HAS PASSED. NOW, THERE ARE
[03:59:28] MORE BIG PLANS FOR REDONDO BEACH SPACES WITH THEM TEARING UP
[03:59:34] ROADS AND EMPTY LOTS AND ADDS PLANTS AND MOVE THINGS AND PUT
[03:59:39] THINGS AT THE DOCKS. THEY HAVE LOTS OF THINGS GOING IN AN AREA
[03:59:43] THAT IS VERY CLOSE TO HERMOSA BEACH. WE SHOULDN'T NOW DISREGARD
[03:59:47] AN OPPORTUNITY THAT IS COMING BECAUSE WE ACTUALLY HAVE TIME TO
[03:59:51] SEE THESE PLANS COMING TO FRUITION AND GET A WATER INFILTRATION
[03:59:57] PLANT INTO THOSE PLANS.
[03:59:58] I ALSO WANT TO SAY AS FAR AS SPACE, AND THESE KIDS HAVE JUST
[04:00:04] THE OCEAN, YOU WOULDN'T WANT A MCMANSION BUILT ON A TINY LOT. WE
[04:00:10] HAVE REQUIREMENTS. YOU HAVE REQUIREMENTS, HOW CLOSE YOUR HOUSE
[04:00:13] CAN GO TO THE NEXT HOUSE, AND WE HAVE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS ALL
[04:00:18] OVER THE CITY BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT LARGE THINGS IN SMALL SPACES.
[04:00:21] THIS IS A VERY BIG PROJECT TRYING TO GO IN VERY SMALL AND CRAMMED
[04:00:27] MINIMAL GREEN SPACES THAT HERMOSA BEACH HAS. SO I THANK YOU FOR
[04:00:31] LISTENING. I JUST SAY THAT WE JUST NEED THREE FOR NO. 3.
[04:00:36] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[04:00:37] >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. BETH?
[04:00:41] >> HI. I'M BETH ROHR. I LIVE AT 1055 8TH P LACE. THANKS
[04:00:49] FOR LISTENING TO US. ONE KEY THING I WANTED TO SAY, ESPECIALLY
[04:00:52] TO THE KIDS THAT ARE FOCUSING ON THE CONSTRUCTION AND A MOMENTARY
[04:00:57] INCONVENIENCE, THIS IS NOT A MOMENTARY INCONVENIENCE. THIS IS
[04:01:01] LONG-TERM DAMAGE TO OUR COMMUNITY. IT IS LONG-TERM DAMAGE TO OUR
[04:01:05] SOIL, TO OUR AIR. THERE IS CONTAMINATION THAT WILL GO INTO BOTH.
[04:01:10] SO I'M ASKING THAT, AGAIN, PLEASE CHOOSE OPTION 3 AND PLEASE
[04:01:16] LOOK AT THE LONG TERM DAMAGE AND THE HOMEOWNERS, THEY ARE -- WE
[04:01:20] HAVE HOMEOWNERS BACK THERE CRYING WHO REALLY WANT TO SPEAK, BUT
[04:01:25] BECAUSE THEY ARE SO EMOTIONAL -- THESE ARE THEIR HOMES THAT ARE
[04:01:28] RIGHT NEXT TO THE PARK. THEY ARE BEING -- THEY ARE BEING
[04:01:33] PERSONALLY NOT INCONVENIENCED. THIS IS THEIR HOME AND COST OF
Page 67 of 94
[04:01:40] LIVING AND THEIR EVERYTHING. IT IS NOT JUST A TWO-YEAR
[04:01:43] INCONVENIENCE. IT IS LONG-TERM.
[04:01:46] I JUST WANTED TO SAY SO MANY OF THE THINGS ARE THE SAME
[04:01:57] THINGS WE DEALT WITH, WITH OIL. IF YOU VOTED NO ON OIL, I DON'T
[04:02:04] KNOW HOW YOU COULD VOTE FOR THIS. IT IS THE SAME THING IN MY
[04:02:07] MIND. THANK YOU.
[04:02:08] >> THANK YOU, BETH. MADAME CLERK? OKAY. OUR CLERK
[04:02:13] DOESN'T HAVE MORE CARDS IF YOU ARE IN THE AUDIENCE RIGHT NOW AND
[04:02:16] WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, PLEASE STEP FORWARD.
[04:02:20] >> I WOULD LIKE [INDISCERNIBLE].
[04:02:23] >> I'M SORRY WE MISSED YOU.
[04:02:24] >> I'M KELLY MUNIN AND LIVE ON 4TH STREET IN HERMOSA RIGHT
[04:02:31] ON THE GREENBELT ADJACENT TO SOUTH PARK. I THANK YOU FOR
[04:02:34] RECOMMENDING WE DON'T DO IT ON THE GREENBELT AND SOUTH PARK, BUT
[04:02:38] I ASK YOU TO TAKE IT COMPLETELY OFF THE TABLE. WE DEFINITELY
[04:02:42] NEED TO DO OPTION 3. I WAS HEARTENED TO HEAR REDONDO WAS WILLING
[04:02:48] TO TALK TO US, AT LEAST, AND CONSIDER TO SHARE THE BURDEN WITH
[04:02:52] US. I'M NOT SURE WHY WE ARE LOOKING AT FRANCISCA AND NOT HERONDO
[04:02:59] BETWEEN VALLEY AND MONTERREY. USING BOTH SIDES OF HERONDO, WE
[04:03:05] WOULD SHARE IT WITH REDONDO. WE WOULD HAVE HALF, AND THEY WOULD
[04:03:09] HAVE HALF OF FEW AREAS ARE IMPACTED. THEY HAVE DRIVEWAYS ON
[04:03:15] VALLEY. YOU CAN STILL USE MONTERREY AND VALLEY AND PEOPLE CAN
[04:03:19] USE HERONDO ON EITHER SIDES OF THOSE. TO ME, THAT SEEMS LIKE AN
[04:03:23] IDEAL LOCATION RIGHT WHERE THE DRAIN IS TO SHARE THE BURDEN WITH
[04:03:29] REDONDO. I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU DIDN'T MENTION THAT WAS ON THE
[04:03:32] TABLE. I APPRECIATE YOU ARE TALKING TO REDONDO TO COMPLETELY
[04:03:36] RENEGOTIATE THE DEAL. THIS HAPPENED IN 2013, AND YOU WAITED TO
[04:03:41] 2018 TO START DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT? THAT IS ON YOU. YOU
[04:03:45] SHOULDN'T MAKE PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THE AREAS OF HERMOSA PAY THE
[04:03:49] PRICE FOR YOUR BAD DECISIONS. THIS IS SOMETHING YOU SHOULD HAVE
[04:03:52] TAKEN CARE OF A LONG TIME AGO WITH PLENTY OF TIME TO DEAL WITH IT
[04:03:56] IN THE RIGHT WAY. THANK YOU.
[04:03:58] >> THANK YOU. ADAM?
[04:04:05] >> THANK YOU. ADAM WALL, 517 LOMA DRIVE, AND I APPRECIATE
[04:04:10] THE TIME. SORRY I WAS LATE. I MISSED EVERYBODY. I GOT OFF AT
[04:04:17] THE BASEBALL FIELD.
[04:04:18] >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.
[04:04:20] >> BY THE WAY, WE TIED.
[04:04:22] >> PERFECT.
[04:04:23] >> THANK YOU GUYS AND COUNCILMEMBERS THAT MET AND TALKED
[04:04:27] WITH ME. I TRULY APPRECIATE THAT. MY WIFE AND I LIVED ON LOMA
[04:04:31] DRIVE FOR OVER 12 YEARS AND OUR FAMILY. I WANT TO THANK JESSICA
[04:04:36] ARCADIA, BETH, AND CAMMY FOR THE HARD WORK THEY PUT INTO SOUTH
[04:04:41] PARK. MEMBERS THAT WERE THERE THIS PAST WEEK, YOU SEE HOW MANY
[04:04:45] KIDS AND ADULTS USE THAT. IT IS A GREAT FACILITY. I WANT TO
[04:04:49] START OFF WITH I KNOW WE HAVE TO DO OUR PART. WE NEVER SAID, NO.
[04:04:52] WE WON'T DO SOMETHING. WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING BUT SOMETHING OF
Page 68 of 94
[04:04:55] THIS MAGNITUDE, THIS IS PROBABLY NOT THE WAY WE WANT TO GO.
[04:04:58] AGAIN, AS IRA SAID, I'M PRETTY DISAPPOINTED IN THE CITY THAT YOU
[04:05:03] KNEW THE ENTIRE TIME WE TALKED WHETHER IT WAS BACK IN JUNE OR
[04:05:09] OCTOBER. IT WAS ALWAYS 500 FEET AND SOMEHOW THE 300-FOOT NUMBER
[04:05:13] CAME UP. NEXT DOOR NEIGHBORS, 299 GOT A NOTIFICATION, AND WE
[04:05:18] DIDN'T GET ANYTHING. WE ARE THE LAST STREET OVERLOOKING SOUTH
[04:05:22] PARK. I'M REALLY DISAPPOINTED IN THAT. ANOTHER ISS UE, AGAIN, AS
[04:05:26] EVERYBODY STATED IS THE ODOR. I SIGNED -- WE SIGNED UP ABOUT
[04:05:30] THIS HOUSE ABOUT THE NOISE. THAT IS NOT AN ISSUE WE ARE TALKING
[04:05:33] ABOUT. WE KNOW ABOUT NOISE AND ARE ACCUSTOMED TO LATE -NIGHT
[04:05:38] PARTIERS IN SOUTH PARK AND KIDS YELLING AND SCREAMING. WE SIGNED
[04:05:42] UP FOR THAT WHEN BOUGHT OUR HOUSE BUT DIDN'T SIGN UP FOR THINGS
[04:05:46] LIKE BIG DIGS AND ODOR AND CONTAMINATION. NOT REALLY HAVE THERE
[04:05:51] BEEN TESTS DONE FOR THIS. AGAIN, WHEN STAFF REPORT STATED THIS
[04:05:54] WILL BE FINISHED IN 12 MONTHS. BE REALISTIC WITH HOW THE STATE
[04:05:59] WORKS WHEN IT COMES TO CONSTRUCTION. WE ARE LOOKING AT PROBABLY
[04:06:02] 18+ MONTHS. I HAVE KIDS GOING FROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO MIDDLE
[04:06:06] SCHOOL AND USING THAT FOR NURF BOARDS NOW. BY THE TIME THE
[04:06:11] PROJECT IS DONE, THEY WILL BE DOING THEIR OLDER THING PROBABLY ON
[04:06:18] BEACHES, BUT THEY UTILIZE THAT PARK RIGHT NOW WITH ALL THEIR
[04:06:22] FRIENDS. TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. FOR THOSE THAT HAVEN'T
[04:06:25] BEEN TO THE PROJECT IN LAKEWOOD, I MEAN, IF YOU HEAR THE NOISE,
[04:06:29] THERE IS A LOUD NOISE THAT COMES FROM THAT BOX THAT IS RAISED
[04:06:32] ABOVE THE GROUND. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I DID NOT SIGN UP FOR
[04:06:36] AS A HOMEOWNER LIVING NEXT TO SOUTH PARK. AGAIN, I DON'T THINK
[04:06:41] THERE HAVE BEEN TESTS DONE FOR WATER TABLE LEVELS FOR
[04:06:44] LIQUEFACTION AND LANDSLIDES AT SOUTH PARK. WE ARE ASKING FOR
[04:06:49] SOMETHING THAT IS FAIR. DISSOLVE MOU AND LOOK AT OTHER PROJECTS.
[04:06:54] WE ARE ALL FOR SMALLER PROJECTS AT HERMOSA BEACH BUT NOT THIS
[04:06:59] ONE. THANK YOU.
[04:07:00] >> THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE FOR PUBLIC
[04:07:03] COMMENT AT THIS TIME?
[04:07:05] >> I WILL TRY.
[04:07:06] >> ALL RIGHT. JESSICA.
[04:07:13] >> I'M JESSICA [INDISCERNIBLE]. I LIVE ON LOMA DRIVE. I'M
[04:07:16] SORRY. I'M SO UPSET. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU REMEMBER, BUT WHEN
[04:07:21] BEACH CITY HEALTH DISTRICT DID THEIR BLUE ZONE SURVEY, THE SOUTH
[04:07:26] BAY CAME BACK AS STRESSED AS NEW ORLEANS AFTER HURRICANE KATRINA.
[04:07:32] THE REASON WHY WE WERE ALL SO STRESSED IS BECAUSE WE SPEND ALL
[04:07:37] OUR TIME WORRYING ABOUT HOW WE WILL AFFORD TO LIVE HERE. THAT IS
[04:07:40] LITERALLY IN THE BEACH CITY HEALTH DISTRICT STUDY. I LEAVE EVERY
[04:07:45] WEEK TO GO WORK IN SAN FRANCISCO TO AFFORD TO LIVE HERE AND OWN A
[04:07:49] HOME. I HAVE NEIGHBORS ON MY STREET THAT WORK DOUBLE SHIFTS AT
[04:07:54] SHARKY'S JUST TO AFFORD THE RENT. I JUST REALLY FEEL LIKE WE A RE
[04:07:59] NOT BEING TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. I APPRECIATE ALL OF YOU WHO
[04:08:03] CAME TO LISTEN TO US. THE FACT WE DIDN'T EVEN GET NOTIFIED AND
[04:08:08] EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT WE LIVE AT SOUTH PARK. I'M AT PARK AND REC.
Page 69 of 94
[04:08:12] I HAVE TO RECUSE MYSELF EVERY TIME WE TALK ABOUT SOUTH PARK. I
[04:08:16] WASN'T ABLE TO VOTE ON THE COMMUNITY GARDEN OR PLAYGROUND.
[04:08:20] SOMEHOW FOR THIS PROJECT, WE WEREN'T EVEN NOTICED. I JUST -- I
[04:08:23] JUST REALLY FEEL LIKE IN OCTOBER I LEFT IN GOOD FAITH. I WAS
[04:08:27] GOING TO DO MY PART, AND I PROMISED I WOULD STAY POSITIVE. THAT
[04:08:31] IS WHY I'M SO UPSET. EVERYONE TONIGHT HAS BEEN SO POSITIVE AND
[04:08:35] LOVELY, AND I'M OVER HERE SITTING HERE STRESSING OUT, WILL I BE
[04:08:39] ABLE TO LIVE IN HERMOSA ANYMORE IF SOMETHING HAPPENS TO MY
[04:08:44] PROPERTY VALUE OR TO MY CHILD AND THAT PARK BECAUSE OF
[04:08:47] CONTAMINATION OR DANGERS THAT COME FROM THE CONSTRUCTION?
[04:08:50] AND I JUST WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW THAT, THAT IS REAL. IT IS
[04:08:53] NOT SELF-SERVING.
[04:08:56] IT IS LITERALLY AN EPIDEMIC IN THE SOUTH BAY. PEOPLE ARE
[04:09:01] DYING OF STROKES AND HEART ATTACKS AND HAVING HUGE DEPRESSION
[04:09:05] ISSUES BECAUSE THEY -- EVERY DAY THEY WAKE UP WONDERING HOW THEY
[04:09:09] WILL AFFORD TO LIVE HERE. I JUST WANT THAT TO BE RECOGNIZED. I
[04:09:13] DON'T WANT TO BE BULLIED FOR IT OR BE CALLED A NIMBYIST OR
[04:09:18] SELF-SERVING BECAUSE I CARE ABOUT TAKING CARE OF MY FAMILY.
[04:09:22] THANK YOU.
[04:09:23] >> THANK YOU, JESSICA. ANYONE ELSE? YES. COME ON UP.
[04:09:27] >> HI. I'M DAN RUCOS AND LIVE AT 501 AND WANT TO SAY MAYOR
[04:09:32] AND COUNCILMEN, THANKS FOR VISITING GREENBELT AND SOUTH PARK AND
[04:09:38] THANKS FOR YOUR RECOMMENDATION ON 3 ON 3. THANK YOU.
[04:09:42] >> THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? ALL RIGHT. I WILL CLOSE
[04:09:47] PUBLIC COMMENT. THANK YOU EVERYONE FOR COMING UP AND SPEAKING
[04:09:51] AND SUBMITTING YOUR COMMENTS ONLINE AS WELL. I WILL LOOK TO MY
[04:09:55] COLLEAGUES FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION FOR A MOTION. ALL RIGHT.
[04:10:05] MAYOR PRO TEM?
[04:10:08] >> I DON'T KNOW HOW TO COALESCE MY THOUGHTS. I WILL
[04:10:13] MENTION A COUPLE OF THINGS. I WANT TO JUST START BY GIVING A
[04:10:17] COUPLE THANK YOUS ACROSS THE DAIS HERE. THE FIRST ONE, I WAS
[04:10:21] SITTING HERE THINKING COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY, IT WAS YOUR
[04:10:26] SUGGESTION WE CLEAR THE DECKS FOR THIS CONVERSATION TONIGHT AND
[04:10:29] TOOK THINGS OFF THE AGENDA TO HAVE THIS TIME AND HAVE IT AT A
[04:10:33] DECENT HOUR. THAT WAS A GOOD CALL. THIS IS VERY, VERY
[04:10:36] IMPORTANT. I WANT TO JUST THANK OUR SUB-COMMITTEE DOUG DUWITH
[04:10:42] WORKING IN-BETWEEN MEETINGS TO REACH OUT TO REDONDO AND TO FIGURE
[04:10:48] OUT WHERE WE WERE AND WHERE WE WOULD GO NEXT.
[04:10:51] THAT IS WHAT WE ARE HERE TO DO. I JUST WANT TO -- I JUST
[04:10:57] WANT TO REALLY DEEPLY THANK EVERYBODY FOR BEING INVOLVED AND
[04:11:01] STAYING INVOLVED AND COMING TO THESE MEETINGS AND EXPRESSING SO
[04:11:05] THOUGHTFULLY YOUR PERSPECTIVES. WHAT IS HARD BEING ON THE
[04:11:09] COUNCIL IS WHEN WE SAY WE ARE AT THE BEGINNING, WHAT WE KNOW IS
[04:11:13] THAT WE JUST HAVE TO SURFACE THINGS AS THEY WERE UNTIL WE MAKE
[04:11:19] ANOTHER DECISION. IF THE GREENBELT WAS ORIGINALLY THERE, WE HAVE
[04:11:23] TO HAVE IT IN THE CONVERSATION UNTIL WE MAKE A DIFFERENT
[04:11:27] DECISION. IT IS NOT NECESSARILY BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T HEARD
Page 70 of 94
[04:11:29] EVERYTHING THAT YOU HAVE BEEN SAID. IN FACT, I THINK THERE IS
[04:11:33] STRONG EVIDENCE TONIGHT THAT GIVEN THE RECOMMENDATION AHEAD OF
[04:11:38] PUBLIC COMMENT THAT YOU HAVE BEEN LISTENED TO. YOU SHOULD BE
[04:11:45] LISTENED TO. IT IS IMPORTANT. I THINK IT WAS A GREAT CALL TO
[04:11:49] MAKE THE STATEMENT BEFORE PUBLIC COMMENT BECAUSE SOMETIMES WE
[04:11:52] HAVE THESE LONG MEETINGS. IF YOU DON'T HAVE THE BENEFIT OF
[04:11:56] INSIGHT, YOU WOULD PROBABLY HAVE HAD MORE STRESS EVEN MORE STRESS
[04:12:02] THAN YOU ALREADY HAVE AROUND THIS ISSUE.
[04:12:04] THAT SAID, THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT I -- I WOULD LIKE A
[04:12:08] LITTLE BIT MORE CLARITY ON. THAT HAS TO DO WITH IF WE APPROVE
[04:12:17] OPTION 3, WHICH IS A VERY SERIOUS CONSIDERATION AND POTENTIAL
[04:12:24] DECISION TO UNRAVEL THE CURRENT MOU, WHICH IS AN APPROVED PROJECT
[04:12:31] WITH SIGNIFICANT FUNDING, I KNOW WE DON'T HAVE ALL OF THE
[04:12:35] ANSWERS. I REALLY APPRECIATE. IN FACT, I WAS GOING TO SAY IF MY
[04:12:39] FRIEND AND COLLEAGUE GARY IS OPTIMISTIC, THAT IS A VERY GOOD
[04:12:45] SIGN.
[04:12:46] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[04:12:47] >> I'M ALWAYS OPTIMISTIC, AND I REALLY BELIEVE THAT WE
[04:12:50] COULD LEAD AT THIS MOMENT IF WE GO WITH OPTION 3. HOWEVER, I
[04:12:54] THINK IT IS REALLY IMPORTANT THAT WE SURFACE A COUPLE OF THE
[04:12:58] THINGS WE SHOULDN'T LEAVE IN THE ROOM AS ASSUMPTIONS OR
[04:13:03] EXPECTATIONS. NO. 1 IS GREAT THAT REDONDO SHOWED UP AT 5 O'CLOCK
[04:13:09] WITH A LETTER SAYING THEY ARE WILLING TO SPEAK WITH US AND
[04:13:12] POTENTIALLY EXPLORE FURTHER SOME OF THE OPTIONS.
[04:13:15] MY -- I CERTAINLY WOULDN'T ASSUME, LIKE MANY PEOPLE HAVE
[04:13:20] STATED, THAT IF WE PURSUED A CONVERSATION WITH REDONDO AND THERE
[04:13:27] WAS A CHANCE AND THERE WAS A GOOD OPTION ON FRANCISCA STREET OR
[04:13:33] THEREABOUTS THAT AS, HAS BEEN STATED BY MANY, INCLUDING OUR CITY
[04:13:39] ATTORNEY AND MANY AS YOU AS RESIDENTS, WE WILL HAVE TO SITE A
[04:13:43] PROJECT. THAT COULD BE A SMALLER PROJECT IN SOUTH PARK THAT
[04:13:47] WOULD BE MUCH MORE EASY TO MANAGE POTENTIALLY. I JUST WANT TO
[04:13:52] RESTATE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE ARE DEALING WITH.
[04:13:56] SO ONE OF THOSE IS A LOT OF UNKNOWNS AS IT PERTAINS TO THE
[04:14:04] COSTS THAT COULD BE MUSHROOMING AROUND BACKING OUT OF THIS
[04:14:09] AGREEMENT. I SAY THAT DAUNTINGLY. IT IS A DAUNTING
[04:14:15] CONSIDERATION. WE REALLY DON'T KNOW. THERE COULD BE LAWSUITS.
[04:14:19] THERE COULD BE PAYBACK OF FUNDS, INCLUDING DAMAGES.
[04:14:23] THERE COULD BE A DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE TASK OF TRYING TO
[04:14:27] FIND ADDITIONAL FUNDING, WHICH WOULD MEAN, JUST SORT OF STATING
[04:14:32] FOR THE RECORD IF WE WERE IN AN ALTERNATIVE STATE WITHOUT A
[04:14:36] CURRENT AGREEMENT, WE WOULD BE FOOTING THE ENTIRE BILL
[04:14:40] POTENTIALLY FOR ANY WORK DONE HERE.
[04:14:43] SO I DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS MORE INSIGHT INTO THAT. I THINK
[04:14:48] IT IS WORTH RESTATING. IF THERE ARE ANY -- ANY OF US UP HERE WHO
[04:14:53] HAVE COMMENTS TO THAT PARTICULAR ASPECT OF THIS, WHICH IS TO ME,
[04:14:57] THE MOST CONCERNING, AND AS A COUNCILMEMBER FEELING LIKE WE HAVE
[04:15:02] A RESPONSIBILITY TO REALLY CONSIDER THAT AS FULLY AND AS POSSIBLE
Page 71 of 94
[04:15:08] AS IN THIS MOMENT. I DON'T KNOW IF CHRISTY WOULD HAVE OR ANY OF
[04:15:12] THE EXPERTS WHO ARE CLOSER TO THIS TOPIC WOULD HAVE ANY FURTHER
[04:15:16] COMMENTS THAN THE ONES THAT THEY HAVE MADE ALREADY THIS EVENING.
[04:15:20] I WOULD BE INTERESTED IN OPENING UP A LITTLE DISCUSSION ABOUT THE
[04:15:25] FINANCIAL IMPACTS TO OUR CITY GIVEN OPTION 3.
[04:15:36] >> KATHLEEN OR CHRISTY OR CITY ATTORNEY? NO ONE WANTS TO
[04:15:44] ANSWER YOU ON THAT ONE?
[04:15:45] >> SO IT IS --
[04:15:47] >> DOES SOMEONE WANT TO RAISE THEIR HAND? THANK YOU,
[04:15:50] KATHLEEN.
[04:15:51] >> I'M SORRY. I CAN'T SPEAK TO THE SITUATION WITH THE
[04:15:54] LEGAL AND FINANCIAL RAMIFICATIONS FROM BACKING OUT OF THE MOU.
[04:15:58] THAT IS OUTSIDE OF MY EXPERTISE.
[04:16:00] >> CAN I ASK YOU A QUESTION?
[04:16:02] >> YES.
[04:16:03] >> ARE THERE ANY KNOWN OR CURRENT PROJECTS THAT HAVE GOTTEN
[04:16:07] FUNDING FROM OTHER SOURCES TO FUND PROJECTS LIKE THIS THAT ARE NO
[04:16:10] THE PART OF THE STATE MATCHING FUNDS PROGRAM?
[04:16:15] >> WELL, I -- I MEAN, THE CITY OF LA HAS RAISED THEIR OWN
[04:16:23] PROP O AND BUILDING PROJECTS WITH THEIR OWN FUNDS THAT THEIR
[04:16:27] CITIZENS PAID FOR, SO -- BUT -- BUT THERE ARE MANY, MANY PROJECTS
[04:16:34] OTHER PROJECTS I'M AWARE OF THAT WERE BUILT WITH COMBINATION OF
[04:16:38] GRANT FUNDING AND LOCAL MATCH. THAT IS TYPICALLY HOW IT IS DONE.
[04:16:42] >> WE WOULD AND IT IS FINE TO STATE, BUT WE WOULD REALLY
[04:16:45] NEED TO ROLL UP OUR SLEEVES AND FIGURE OUT WHERE THE MONEY WILL
[04:16:48] COME FROM IF WE PIVOTED AWAY FROM THIS CURRENT PROGRAM FUNDING.
[04:16:54] >> YES. AND I GUESS THE ONLY THING I FEEL COMFORTABLE
[04:16:57] SAYING IS I DO -- IF YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO GET -- I DON'T KNOW WHAT
[04:17:02] THE LIKELIHOOD OF YOUR POLITICAL WORK WITH THE STATE TO GET THEM
[04:17:07] TO GIVE YOU MORE TIME ON THIS PARTICULAR GRANT, BUT I DO KNOW IN
[04:17:12] MOST GRANT APPLICATIONS THAT WE APPLY FOR, THERE IS -- THERE ARE
[04:17:16] QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT OTHER GRANT FUNDS HAVE YOU MANAGED AND YOU
[04:17:19] KNOW WERE -- YOU WERE YOU FOUND OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH A GRANT
[04:17:26] AGREEMENT AND SO FORTH. THAT WOULD TYPICALLY BE SOMETHING THAT
[04:17:30] FINANCING THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AT THE STATE
[04:17:35] WATER BOARD WOULD LOOK AT IN TERMS OF WHETHER OR HOW THEY WOULD
[04:17:38] VIEW A FUTURE GRANT SO.
[04:17:40] >> OKAY. THANK YOU.
[04:17:42] >> UH-HUH.
[04:17:43] >> WELL, I -- DOES YOUR CITY ATTORNEY WANT TO ADD
[04:17:47] SOMETHING?
[04:17:48] >> WE ARE NOT TRYING TO AVOID ANSWERING YOUR QUESTION, BUT
[04:17:50] I DON'T THINK WE CAN REALLY QUANTIFY IT AND GIVE YOU A REALISTIC
[04:17:55] ANSWER. I THINK I SAID EARLIER THAT THIS, THE OPTION 3 PATH IS
[04:17:59] VERY UNCERTAIN AND HAS A LOT OF POTENTIAL OBSTACLES, SUBSTANTIAL
[04:18:04] AMOUNT OF TIME SPENT IN NEGOTIATIONS AND INTERACTIONS WITH
[04:18:07] REGIONAL BOARD AND WITH OUR PARTNERS. IF YOU WANT TO EXPLORE THE
Page 72 of 94
[04:18:12] FRANCISCA SITE, CHRISTY INDICATED IT WOULD COST PROBABLY AS MUCH
[04:18:18] TO DO THE DESIGN WORK THERE AS IT HAS ALREADY COST TO DATE. WE
[04:18:22] DON'T KNOW IF THAT -- ANY MONEY THAT IS SPENT AT THIS POINT WOULD
[04:18:26] BE WASTED IF REDONDO BEACH ULTIMATELY SAYS NO GIVEN THEIR LETTER
[04:18:31] TONIGHT OPENS A VERY, VERY NARROW WINDOW AT BEST. IT IS VERY
[04:18:35] CAREFULLY WORDED AND VERY QUALIFIED. IF THAT DOESN'T WORK, WE
[04:18:40] HAVE TO REFOCUS OUR EFFORTS SOME PLACE ELSE. WE ARE TALKING
[04:18:44] ABOUT A LOT OF CONSULTANT COSTS, AND SO IT IS REALLY VERY
[04:18:48] DIFFICULT TO QUANTIFY IT. WE ARE TALKING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, I
[04:18:52] THINK. WHEN PUSH COMES TO SHOVE TO GET TO A PLACE WHERE WE MIGHT
[04:18:56] HAVE A SOLUTION, WE DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT THAT SOLUTION WILL
[04:18:59] LOOK LIKE. I MEAN, I THINK THAT IS THE ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION.
[04:19:03] >> I WILL JUST ADD MY PERSPECTIVE. IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT
[04:19:06] THE STATE WATER BOARD NEEDS A LOCATION; RIGHT? THEY WANT TO KNOW
[04:19:11] WHERE ARE WE GOING TO PUT THIS PROJECT? WE HAVE BEEN DANCING
[04:19:14] AROUND THE TOPIC FOR A YEAR NOW, AND WHAT THE REDONDO BEACH
[04:19:21] LETTER SHOWS US IS THAT THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLORE A
[04:19:26] LOCATION IN REDONDO BEACH THAT WOULD NOT REQUIRE NECESSARILY
[04:19:30] DISSOLVING THE MOU AND MAY LEAVE OPEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO RETAIN
[04:19:35] GRANT FUNDING. I AM VERY MOTIVATED TO HELP PARTICIPATE IN THAT.
[04:19:40] I'M SURE COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY WANTS TO CONSIDER TO PURSUE THOSE
[04:19:48] EFFORTS CONSIDERING HIS OPTIMISM. I THINK THAT CAN REALLY WORK
[04:19:51] IN OUR FAVOR, AND I ALSO VIEW MAYOR BRAND AS A VERY REASONABLE
[04:19:56] PERSON. HE HAS PUT OUT THERE ESSENTIALLY SOMEWHAT OF AN OFFER,
[04:20:00] AND WE CAN HAVE A CONVERSATION AND KIND OF WORK THROUGH THOSE
[04:20:04] DETAILS LIKE IMMEDIATELY, LIKE TOMORROW MORNING. AND, YOU KNOW,
[04:20:09] WE CAN WORK WITH STAFF, AND I FEEL BETTER ABOUT IT AT THIS POINT
[04:20:12] THAN I DID IN OCTOBER WHEN, YOU KNOW, THEY PRESENTED TO US OR, I
[04:20:18] GUESS, WE MET IN NOVEMBER AND PRESENTED OBSTACLES THAT WE NEEDED
[04:20:22] TO GET PAST. WE NEEDED THIS MEETING TO BE ABLE TO GIVE US
[04:20:27] AUTHORITY TO BE ABLE TO LOOK AT THAT AS A POTENTIAL LOCATION.
[04:20:30] I ALSO THINK THAT SOME OF THE COMMENTS RAISED BY CHRISTY
[04:20:35] ABOUT A PROJECT EVEN JUST FOR OUR OWN CONTRIBUTION ADDRESSING THE
[04:20:40] JUST LESS THAN 14% COULD END UP COSTING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
[04:20:45] THAT WILL BE THE SAME CASE FOR TORRANCE AND REDONDO BEACH. WHY
[04:20:49] WOULD WE ALL SPEND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
[04:20:54] ON OUR OWN WHEN WE COULD BE MOTIVATED TO SPEND LESS MONEY AND
[04:20:57] HAVE A MORE CONCENTRATED PROJECT AND AT LEAST LOOK AT FRANCISCA
[04:21:04] I'M NOT OPPOSED TO LOOKING AT ADJACENT HERONDO STREET AS WELL AND
[04:21:12] PART OF THE CONVERSATION ALL PARTIES ARE HEAVILY MOTIVATED TO
[04:21:16] WORK TOGETHER AND REGROUP AND FIND A LOCATION. ONE HAS BEEN
[04:21:20] PRESENTED.
[04:21:21] AND MOVE FORWARD TOGETHER TO SAVE EVERYONE TIME, MONEY,
[04:21:26] EXPENSE, AND HEARTACHE.
[04:21:28] >> THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MAYOR ARMATO. THIS IS KIND OF
[04:21:33] WHAT I WAS HOPING WE COULD ADD TO EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN SAID
[04:21:36] TONIGHT. BECAUSE I'M KIND OF WITH YOU WHERE YOU STAND ON THERE
Page 73 of 94
[04:21:40] IS A LOT OF REASONS TO THINK THERE IS STRONG MOTIVATION ON ALL
[04:21:45] SIDES OF -- FOR ALL SORTS OF REASONS. IT IS KIND OF A NARROW AND
[04:21:52] POTENTIALLY STEEP CLIMB AND I WANTED TO MAKE MENTION OF THE IDEA
[04:21:58] OF HAVING A TASK FORCE THAT INCLUDES SOME OF OUR RESIDENTS. ONE
[04:22:05] OF THE REASONS I KNOW THAT CAN SLOW THINGS DOWN SOMETIMES, BUT
[04:22:08] ONE OF THE REASONS I LIKE THAT IDEA OR WOULD LIKE IT AT LEAST
[04:22:13] EXPLORED IS THAT WE HAVE COME THIS FAR. I THINK ONE OF THE
[04:22:17] THINGS WE HAVE SUFFERED FROM IS WE HAVEN'T HAD ENOUGH COMMON
[04:22:21] UNDERSTANDING. I KNOW I HAVE HEARD SEVERAL THINGS TONIGHT THAT
[04:22:25] IN MY LEARNING THROUGH THIS PROJECT UP INCLUDING TO PREPARING
[04:22:28] JUST FOR THIS PAST WEEK THAT WE ARE STILL NOT CLEAR ON ALL OF THE
[04:22:33] FACTS. PEOPLE ARE AFRAID OF THINGS THAT THEY MAY NOT NEED TO BE
[04:22:39] AFRAID OF IN SOME CASES AND VERY, YOU KNOW, STRESSED AND
[04:22:43] CONCERNED FOR VERY GOOD REASONS AS WELL. THE MORE WE CAN BE ON
[04:22:46] THE SAME PAGE AND UTILIZE THE BRAIN POWER IN OUR COMMUNITY, I
[04:22:50] THINK THAT WILL HELP US IN MOVING FORWARD. I LOVE THE IDEA OF
[04:22:53] GETTING OUR STATE REPRESENTATIVES INVOLVED IN HELPING TO BRING
[04:22:59] AWARENESS AND INFLUENCE TO ALL OF THE BODIES. THE STATE WANTS
[04:23:05] AND NEEDS TO DO THIS. ALL OF THE COMMUNITIES NEED AND WANT TO DO
[04:23:08] THIS. I AM NOT OPPOSED FROM WHAT I CURRENTLY UNDERSTAND, SOUTH
[04:23:16] PARK IS POTENTIALLY A PRETTY GOOD LOCATION IF THERE IS A LOCATION
[04:23:22] IN HERMOSA BEACH WHERE WE NEED TO SITE A PROJECT. WE DON'T HAVE
[04:23:27] A LOT OF OPTIONS FRANKLY FOR CITING ANY PROJECT IN OUR CITY. WE
[04:23:35] ARE SQUEEZED. HOWEVER, I DO AGREE THAT IT WOULD BE -- IT SEEMS
[04:23:40] RIGHT-MINDED AND FAIR AND EQUITABLE IN MY MIND IF WE WERE ASKED
[04:23:46] TO SHOULDER A FACILITY OR PROJECT THAT WAS MORE PROPORTIONAL TO
[04:23:50] OUR CONTRIBUTION AND THE CHALLENGES OF, YOU KNOW, OUR CITY. I
[04:23:55] PROBABLY HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF FEW ODDS AND ENDS, BUT I WILL STOP
[04:23:59] THERE AND LET MY COLLEAGUES BUILD IN OR WEIGH IN. THANK YOU.
[04:24:03] THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS?
[04:24:08] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. THIS HAS BEEN A REALLY
[04:24:12] INTERESTING DISCUSSION. THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPORTANT. I --
[04:24:20] BUT I -- THERE IS THE PERSPECTIVE MAY BE A LITTLE SKEWED IN MY
[04:24:25] MIND IN THE SENSE THAT I KNOW THERE IS AN EARLY COMMENT ABOUT THE
[04:24:31] BILLIONS OF GALLONS COMING DOWN AND THE -- ON -- YOU KNOW, WHAT
[04:24:37] WOULD HAPPEN TO THE ORIGINAL GREENBELT SITE, I THINK THAT IS A
[04:24:44] REASONABLE CONCERN AND THINK IT IS WHY I WOULD NEVER APPROVE A
[04:24:48] PROJECT ON THAT ORIGINAL SELECTED SITE. THOSE GALLONS OF WATER
[04:24:54] HAVE COME DOWN, AND WE HAVE BEEN HAVING THIS INCREDIBLE WEATHER.
[04:24:58] PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE ON THE BEACH JUST SOUTH OF THE PIER MAYBE
[04:25:03] FOR ALMOST ABOUT A QUARTER OF A MILE IS AN INFILTRATION PROJECT
[04:25:08] THAT IS RUNNING ALMOST FOR 10 YEARS STRAIGHT NOW WITHOUT A
[04:25:11] PROBLEM. YOU HAVE WALKED BY IT 100 TIMES. THERE HAS NOT BEEN
[04:25:17] ANY SMELL. IT HAS BEEN FUNCTIONING. IN FACT, IT IS AN
[04:25:22] AWARD-WINNING PROJECT THAT WE PUT IN AT THE TIME THAT WE DID THE
[04:25:26] PIER AVENUE RENOVATIONS.
[04:25:29] I'M A LITTLE -- WHEN PEOPLE COME UP AND TALK AND SAY I HAVE
Page 74 of 94
[04:25:33] READ ALL OF THE COMMENTS AND HERE IS WHAT I HAVE TO SAY. MY
[04:25:36] PROBLEM WITH THAT IS THAT ALL OF THE COMMENTS ARE NOT CORRECT.
[04:25:40] THEY MAKE INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT A LOT OF THINGS.
[04:25:44] AND SO THE OTHER THING THAT DISTURBS ME ABOUT THIS
[04:25:48] DISCUSSION IS THAT THESE YOUNG MEN WHO HAVE COME UP HERE AND
[04:25:51] TALKED HAVE AS MUCH STATUS IN THIS DISCUSSION AS ANYBODY IN THIS
[04:25:56] ROOM.
[04:25:57] THAT THEY ARE -- THIS -- THE WHOLE IDEA WHEN WE MAKE
[04:26:00] IMPROVEMENTS, YOU KNOW, TO OUR CITY IS BASICALLY FOR THE LEGACY
[04:26:05] WE WILL LEAVE FOR THE PEOPLE THAT FOLLOW US.
[04:26:08] THEY DESERVE TO HAVE CLEAN WATER AND THEY DESERVE TO HAVE
[04:26:12] CLEAN AIR AND ALL THOSE THINGS THAT WE STRIVE FOR AND TO BE AS
[04:26:17] DISMISSIVE AS I SEE PEOPLE BEING TO WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY BOTHERS
[04:26:22] ME AS A PARENT AND AS A GRANDPARENT, IT BOTHERS ME.
[04:26:27] YOU KNOW, I -- I ALSO -- THE -- THIS -- THIS CONSTANT
[04:26:34] DEMONIZING OF THESE PROJECTS AND PARTICULARLY WHEN IT COMES TO
[04:26:39] THE PLACEMENT OF THESE PROJECTS IN CITY PARKS, WHICH, BY THE WAY,
[04:26:43] IS WHERE THEY GENERALLY ARE SITED. IT IS THE MOST COST-EFFICIENT
[04:26:50] AND IT IS THE -- IT IS THE EASIEST ONE AND IT MAKES -- I THINK
[04:26:54] JOHN WHO HAS SPOKEN HERE A NUMBER OF TIMES. EVERYTHING HE SAYS
[04:26:58] IS TRUE ABOUT THE ADVANTAGE OF THESE.
[04:27:00] THE OTHER THING THAT REALLY SURPRISES ME IS THAT IT IS NOT
[04:27:04] ONLY THE FACT THAT YOU CAN PUT IN A PROJECT THERE, WHICH IS
[04:27:08] UNDERGROUND. YOU WON'T SEE IT OR SMELL IT. THAT FIELD, BY THE
[04:27:12] WAY, WHICH IS ABOUT A SUBSTANDARD OF A FIELD YOU WANT TO SEE IN
[04:27:17] TERMS OF DRAINAGE AND TURF AND EVERYTHING ELSE. YOU KNOW, IT
[04:27:22] GETS REPLACED. THINGS -- IF -- AND SOME PEOPLE HERE IN THIS ROOM
[04:27:27] DID SOME OF THE LITTLE VISITS TO THE PARKS THERE. ONE OF THE
[04:27:30] PARKS WE VISITED, YOU WOULDN'T EVEN -- THE PROJECT HAD LONG BEEN
[04:27:35] COMPLETED. YOU WOULDN'T KNOW THERE WAS A PROJECT THERE. THE --
[04:27:39] AND THERE ARE MANY MORE NEIGHBORS SURROUNDING IT THAN WE WERE TO
[04:27:43] HAVE HERE. THEY WERE MAYBE 50 FEET AWAY THAT NEVER COMPLAINED
[04:27:48] DURING THE CONSTRUCTION AND CERTAINLY DIDN'T COMPLAIN AFTERWARDS
[04:27:51] BECAUSE NOT ONLY WAS THAT PARK RESTORED BUT IT WAS IMPROVED.
[04:27:57] AND SO I'M -- IT BOTHERS ME THAT WE ARE NOT BEING HONEST
[04:28:01] ABOUT THIS IN TERMS OF WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES OF DOING SOMETHING
[04:28:05] LIKE THAT, BY PUTTING IT IN THAT AREA. IT HAS TO DO WITH HOW YOU
[04:28:11] DO IT AND DO WITH MEASURES YOU TAKE IN TERMS OF SAFETY WHEN YOU
[04:28:16] DO IT BUT ULTIMATELY YOU CAN HAVE IN TERMS OF SOUTH PARK NOT ONLY
[04:28:20] IMPROVED PARK BUT COMPLETED PARK. YOU KNOW, THE MASTER PLAN FOR
[04:28:25] THAT PARK IS FAR FROM BEING COMPLETED. THE OTHER PROBLEM THAT I
[04:28:29] HAVE WITH THIS IS I JUST BELIEVE THAT THIS SOLUTION THAT YOU ARE
[04:28:34] LOOKING AT, EVERYBODY IS VERY HAPPY ABOUT THIS, IT IS ONE OF THE
[04:28:40] MOST -- THE LARGEST EXAMPLES I CAN THINK OF, OF A POLITICAL
[04:28:45] SOLUTION. IT IS GOING TO REQUIRE OTHER LOCAL ENTITIES, ELECTEDS,
[04:28:54] TO MAKE DECISIONS IN OUR FAVOR AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AND GROUPS
[04:28:58] AND BODIES TO MAKE DECISIONS IN OUR FAVOR AND STATE ELECTED
Page 75 of 94
[04:29:02] OFFICIALS TO GO BEYOND LIP SERVICE AND ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING IN
[04:29:06] AN -- WITH A SENSE OF IMMEDIACY TO SOLVE A PROBLEM. ALL THOSE
[04:29:13] THINGS AS THE CITY ATTORNEY HAS MENTIONED NEED TO FALL INTO PLACE
[04:29:17] FOR US TO -- THEN AT THE SAME TIME, WE MOVE IT OVER TO FRANCISCA
[04:29:23] STREET AND WE DON'T EVEN KNOW IF IT COULD TAKE 1/3 OF THE
[04:29:28] PROJECT. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THE SOIL SAMPLE WILL BE. SO WE KNOW
[04:29:31] AT THE END WE WILL END UP COMING BACK TO HERMOSA BEACH AS A
[04:29:37] LOCATION BECAUSE WE HAVE A PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY. WE WILL HAVE
[04:29:42] SPENT 1 MILLION OR MORE DOLLARS OF CITY MONEY AND WE ARE BACK TO
[04:29:47] SQUARE ONE. I WISH WE WOULD BE A LITTLE MORE HONEST ABOUT --
[04:29:52] ABOUT ONE, OUR CHANCES, AND TWO, THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THAT
[04:29:57] WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO DO THIS. IT WILL BE SOMEWHERE AND A
[04:30:02] CITY POPULIST AS WE ARE THAT SOMEBODY WON'T BE HAPPY ABOUT IN
[04:30:08] TERMS OF THIS DISRUPTION. IT MAY BE 12 MONTHS O F CONSTRUCTION.
[04:30:13] IT MIGHT BE, YOU KNOW, A LIFETIME OF ENHANCED BENEFITS IN
[04:30:18] RELATION TO THAT PARK. NO ONE IS BEING FAIR ABOUT THAT ARGUMENT.
[04:30:22] AND THAT IS WHAT BOTHERS ME. SO, YOU KNOW, I HAVE -- I WOULD
[04:30:27] HAVE PROBLEMS WITH, YOU KNOW, THE CITY ATTORNEY SAID IT. IT HAS
[04:30:32] BEEN HERE FOR A WHILE. HE KNOWS THE CITY PRETTY WELL THAT OPTION
[04:30:37] 3 IS ESSENTIALLY NO OPTION. I HAVE GREAT CONFIDENCE IN MY
[04:30:42] COLLEAGUES AND APPRECIATE ALL OF THE WORK THEY HAVE DONE.
[04:30:45] BASICALLY IT IS A SNARED ILLUSION IN MY MIND BECAUSE IT -- THE
[04:30:50] LIKELIHOOD OF US GETTING THE LEVEL OF APPROVALS AND HAVING IT
[04:30:54] MEET THE STANDARDS WE NEED THAT WILL SORT OF ABSOLVE US OF HAVING
[04:31:00] TO TAKE THE RESPONSIBILITY THAT IS OURS IN DOING THIS PROJECT ARE
[04:31:06] VERY UNLIKELY.
[04:31:07] SO I HAVE A HARD TROUBLE -- I WOULD HAVE A HARD TIME
[04:31:12] SUPPORTING THIS MOTION. I -- YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT WE HAVE TO
[04:31:17] BE HONEST HERE. WE ARE WHERE WE ARE. WHAT WE MAY END UP DOING
[04:31:21] IS WE WILL BE BACK HERE A YEAR OR SO LATER STARTING FROM SQUARE
[04:31:27] ONE AND IN THE MEANTIME 10 BILLION GALLONS OF FLUID AND TRASH AND
[04:31:33] WHATEVER WILL BE GOING DOWN THAT STORM DRAIN. WE WILL HAVE DONE
[04:31:37] NOTHING TO RESOLVE THAT. THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR.
[04:31:41] >> ALL RIGHT. COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY.
[04:31:44] >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. I SURE WISH WE HAD
[04:31:56] A BINDING COMMITMENT FROM REDONDO BEACH. I'M WILLING TO TRUST
[04:32:02] YOUR JUDGMENT THAT OPTION 3 IS VIABLE AND SUPPORTED, BUT --
[04:32:12] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[04:32:13] >> OH, SORRY.
[04:32:16] >> SOMEBODY NEEDS TO STEP UP AND GET THIS THING ACROSS THE
[04:32:20] FINISH LINE. WE JUST WENT THROUGH NORTH SCHOOL. WE HAD THE SAME
[04:32:25] NEED THERE. WE DID IT.
[04:32:28] WE NEED TO DO THE SAME THING HERE. WE CAN'T LET 6 MONTHS GO
[04:32:33] BY AGAIN. SO, MY PREFERENCE WOULD BE THAT WE PROPOSE TO AMEND
[04:32:40] THE MOU TO ALL OF THE PARTIES TO THE MOU RATHER THAN DISSOLVE IT
[04:32:47] BECAUSE I THINK AMENDING IT GIVES A BETTER CHANCE TO RETAIN THE
[04:32:51] GRANT FUNDING.
Page 76 of 94
[04:32:54] I THINK THAT WE NEED TO HAVE A VERY SPECIFIC PROPOSAL WITH
[04:32:59] RESPECT TO WHAT THE NEW MOU WILL LOOK LIKE WITH RESPECT TO
[04:33:03] PARTICULAR DEAL POINTS AND I THINK IT NEEDS TO CONTEMPLATE THAT
[04:33:08] THE OTHER PROJECTS IN THE EWIM WILL BE MOVED UP. THIS IS THE
[04:33:14] HIGHEST PRIORITY PROJECT AND IT WAS NO. 1 ON THE LIST. IF WE ARE
[04:33:19] GOING TO GO A DIFFERENT ROUTE WITH THIS PROJECT THERE IS NO
[04:33:22] REASON TO WAIT FOR THE OTHER PROJECTS WITH REGIONAL BOARD LOOKING
[04:33:26] OVER SHOULDERS TO GET REQUIREMENTS DONE TO MEET [INDISCERNIBLE].
[04:33:31] WE HAVE TO HAVE PART OF PROPOSAL PRIMARIL Y OTHER EWIM PROJECTS
[04:33:36] WITH SUPPORT WILL BE MOVED UP IN TERMS OF PRIORITY LIST. SECOND
[04:33:41] DEAL POINT NEEDS TO BE REDONDO OR TORRANCE OR REDONDO -- WITH
[04:33:49] RESPECT TO THIS PROJECT AT THE -- IN THIS WATER SHED.
[04:33:55] WE NEED TO COMMIT TO ASSISTING WITH THE PROPOSITION 1
[04:34:02] TRANSFER FOR REAPPLICATION, ASSISTING WITH ANY APPLICATION FOR
[04:34:07] MEASURE W FUNDS, KATHLEEN BROUGHT UP A GOOD POINT THAT LA IS
[04:34:12] FUNDING THEIR OWN STORM WATER PROJECTS THROUGH THEIR OWN MEASURE
[04:34:17] O DIGGING IN THEIR OWN PROJECT TO FUND THEIR OWN PROJECTS WE ARE
[04:34:21] DOING THE SAME THING THIS COUNCIL ENDORSED MEASURE W THAT JUST
[04:34:25] PASSED WITH I THINK MAJORITY SUPPORT IN HERMOSA BEACH I READ
[04:34:30] TODAY THAT THE COUNTY WILL START COLLECTING THAT PROPERTY TAX
[04:34:33] THIS JULY. JULY 1ST THIS FISCAL YEAR, I DON'T KNOW WHEN THE
[04:34:37] APPLICATION WINDOW OPENS, BUT MEASURE W IS A POT OF MONEY WE
[04:34:41] SHOULD BE SEEKING.
[04:34:43] WE ALSO NEED TO MAKE IT VERY CLEAR WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO
[04:34:48] GOING FORWARD IN ADDITION TO BEING A PARTICIPATING AGENCY ON
[04:34:52] LOOKING AT WHERE THIS PROJECT SHOULD BE LOCATED AND ASSISTING
[04:34:56] WITH WHAT. REDONDO BEACH HAS ASKED US TO DO, WHICH IS ASSISTING
[04:35:00] WITH THE REGIONAL BOARD AND KEEPING US IN COMPLIANCE WITH MS4
[04:35:05] PERMIT AND EWIM AND ASSISTING WITH FUNDING AND OTHERWISE. WE
[04:35:09] HAVE TO MAKE IT CRYSTAL CLEAR WE, THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, ARE
[04:35:14] WILLING TO SITE PROJECTS IN HERMOSA BEACH THAT CAPTURE OUR
[04:35:20] [INDISCERNIBLE] TO HERMOSA BEACH. CRYSTAL CLEAR I HEARD
[04:35:25] EVERYBODY OUT THERE, HEARD IN SPADES, WE BELIEVE IN CLEAN WATER
[04:35:29] AND ARE WILLING TO DO OUR PART. THE TIME TO DELIVER ON THAT IS
[04:35:32] COMING. IF WE ARE GOING TO GET REDONDO TO STEP UP AND TAKE THEIR
[04:35:38] CONTRIBUTION, WE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH EQUITY ABOUT THE PROPOSED
[04:35:42] PROJECT. IT IS CRYSTAL CLEAR THAT WE WILL DIFFER AND TAKE ON OUR
[04:35:47] CONTRIBUTION. THAT MEANS THERE MAY BE A SMALLER PROJECT ON THE
[04:35:51] GREENBELT, SOMETHING LIKE WHAT WE SEE AT PIER AVENUE INFILTRATION
[04:35:56] TRENCH OR SOMETHING WE SEE AT MANHATTAN BEACH AND BOUNDARY. AND
[04:36:01] SECOND, THAT WE HAVE ALL GONE AND LOOKED AT.
[04:36:04] WE ALSO NEED TO TELL THESE FOLKS THAT WE WILL PUT OR TELL
[04:36:08] OUR PARTNERS WE WILL PUT A WORK GROUP TOGETHER NOW TO MAKE SURE
[04:36:15] THAT WHEN THE TIME COMES, WE HAVE COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THE
[04:36:19] PROJECT THAT WILL BE IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE WON'T GO THROUGH THE
[04:36:23] WHOLE PROCESS OF CHANGING IT AND THEN TWO YEARS DOWN THE ROAD AND
[04:36:27] SAY, OKAY. NOW WE HAVE TO FIGURE OUT WHERE OUR PROJECT IS AND
Page 77 of 94
[04:36:30] GET OUT AHEAD OF THAT AND GET THESE FOLKS WHILE THEY ARE ENGAGED
[04:36:34] TO PARTNER WITH US AND OUR PARTNERS IN THE MOU TO PICK A PROJECT
[04:36:39] IN HERMOSA BEACH. IF THAT IS NECESSARY, IN THE EVENT WE CAN'T
[04:36:43] SITE A PROJECT, THAT CAPTURES 100% OF PROBLEM OF GREENBELT
[04:36:48] PROJECT OUTSIDE OF HERMOSA BEACH. SO THERE IS ADDITIONAL THINGS
[04:36:52] THAT MIGHT GO INTO THOSE DEAL POINTS, BUT ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2019,
[04:36:59] OUR STAFF MET WITH STAFF MEMBER IN REDONDO BEACH AND TORRANCE TO
[04:37:05] DISCUSS HOW TO PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT. THEY ASKED US IF MOU
[04:37:08] CAN'T BE EXECUTED, THIS COUNCIL NEEDS TO SEND A LETTER TO THEIR
[04:37:13] COUNCILS ASKING THEM TO DISSOLVE THE MOU AND FORFEIT THE GRANT.
[04:37:18] I DON'T THINK WE HAVE TO DO EXACTLY THAT. WE CAN -- SENATOR ALAN
[04:37:26] AND JANIS HAHN AND ANYBODY AND EVERYBODY AT HIGHER LEVELS OF
[04:37:31] GOVERNMENT TO RETAIN PROP 1 GRANT AND MAKE THIS A SEAMLESS
[04:37:36] TRANSITION. WE HAVE TO SEND THAT LETTER AND THAT LETTER HAS TO
[04:37:38] INCLUDE VERY SPECIFIC DIRECTION ABOUT HOW WE WANT TO PROCEED AND
[04:37:42] WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO TO FULFILL OUR OBLIGATION TO TAKE OUR
[04:37:46] CONTRIBUTION TO THAT STORM DRAIN AND DO SOMETHING WITH IT.
[04:37:50] SO I THANK YOU FOR ALL OF YOUR WORK. I DO WANT TO CLOSE BY
[04:37:56] ADDRESSING A FEW THINGS.
[04:37:58] THERE IS A LOT OF FEAR IN THIS ROOM AND LOTS OF FEAR IN THE
[04:38:03] COMMUNITY. FOR ME, THIS IS AN ISSUE OF EQUITY NOT SAFETY. WE
[04:38:10] HAVE HEARD CONCERNS ABOUT LIQUEFACTION AND NOISE AND CONCERNS
[04:38:15] ABOUT ODOR AND CONCERNS ABOUT TOXIC BUILDUP. IF YOU SAT THROUGH
[04:38:19] ALL OF THE MEETINGS AS I HAVE AND READ THE DOCUMENTS, THAT STUFF
[04:38:25] DOESN'T FIND A WHOLE LOT OF SUPPORT.
[04:38:28] SO THERE IS AN EQUITY PIECE HERE. THERE IS A PROJECT OF
[04:38:33] THIS SIZE HAS AN ISSUE WITH BEING A FOOT SHORT OF THE PERCOLATION
[04:38:38] DEPTH YOU WOULD WANT. THERE ARE CONSTRUCTION CONCERNS DEPENDING
[04:38:43] UPON YOUR LOCATION, THIS IS A 12 TO 18-MONTH PROJECT. WE KNOW
[04:38:48] TIMELINES ARE ELASTIC WHEN YOU GET INTO ACTUALLY B UILDING THEM
[04:38:52] AND ISSUES WITH ABOVE GROUND EQUIPMENT PUMP STATIONS AND CONTROLS
[04:38:58] AND THAT TYPE OF THING AND WHERE THEY WOULD GO AND IF THEY WILL
[04:39:01] BE OKAY THOSE ARE LEGITIMATE CONCERNS AS IS EQUITY OF HOW MUCH OF
[04:39:07] THE OUTFALL WE ARE TAKING ON IN TERMS OF HANDLING IT.
[04:39:14] COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS SAID LOTS OF WHAT HAS BEEN PUT OUT IN THE
[04:39:19] COMMUNITY THAT IS MAKING PEOPLE FEARFUL OF THE PROJECT DOESN'T
[04:39:23] STAND UP TO SCRUTINY WHEN YOU READ THE DOCUMENTATION AND WHEN YOU
[04:39:27] TALK TO THE EXPERTS AND WHEN YOU WATCH THE MEETINGS WE HAVE HAD.
[04:39:32] KEEP THAT IN MIND. MY HOPE IS AS IT ALWAYS HAS BEEN, THAT FOLKS
[04:39:36] STICK TO THE FACTS AND THAT WE UNDERSTAND WHAT THE IMPACTS OF
[04:39:40] THIS PROJECT WILL AND WON'T BE.
[04:39:43] NOT JUST FINANCIALLY BUT ENVIRONMENTALLY AND OTHERWISE.
[04:39:47] THAT IS THE ONLY WAY THAT WE MAKE PROPER DECISIONS FOR THE
[04:39:50] COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR.
[04:39:54] >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ONE SECOND. YES
[04:39:57] COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS.
[04:40:00] >> SO I'M CLEAR IN THIS, YOUR SUPPORT IS NOT TO INITIATE IT
Page 78 of 94
[04:40:04] AS A DISSOLUTION BUT TO INITIATE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT; IS
[04:40:08] THAT CORRECT?
[04:40:09] >> AMENDMENT ORDINANCE SOLUTION I WOULD SUGGEST THAT OUR
[04:40:13] LETTERS RECOMMEND AN AMENDMENT AS A MORE SEAMLESS TRANSITION BUT
[04:40:18] IN THE EVENT THAT OUR COUNTERPARTS AND MOU BELIEVE THAT
[04:40:23] DISSOLUTION IS THE WAY TO START AND REWRITE MOU FROM SCRATCH.
[04:40:27] THAT WOULD BE THE WAY TO GO.
[04:40:30] >> ALL RIGHT. MAYOR PRO TEM?
[04:40:33] >> YEAH. THIS IS ANOTHER QUESTION I HAD THAT COMES UP
[04:40:36] RIGHT NOW. THAT IS AND, IN THE OPINION OF ALL MY COLLEAGUES, IS
[04:40:41] THERE -- I UNDERSTAND THE AMENDMENT AND HOPE TO HANG ON TO THE
[04:40:46] FUNDING POTENTIALLY. I WONDER IF THE DISSOLUTION WILL PROVIDE
[04:40:53] MORE MOTIVATION TO COME TO THE TABLE AND TALK NEW OPTIONS.
[04:40:58] I GUESS I ASSUME THAT MEANS THERE IS SOME GUARANTEE WE WILL
[04:41:02] LOSE THE GRANT AWARD. IS THERE ANY WAY THAT WE COULD ACT NOW AND
[04:41:06] ACT EXTREMELY BOLDLY AND BRING ALL OF THE RESOURCES TO OUR BACK
[04:41:11] AND DO BOTH, DISSOLVE, RESET, AND MAINTAIN THAT HOPE OF FUNDING?
[04:41:20] BECAUSE WE HAVE, YOU KNOW, RALLIED A VERY STRONG AND AGGRESSIVE
[04:41:27] TIME SENSITIVE EFFORT TO GET THIS DONE, AS YOU SAID. I DON'T
[04:41:31] KNOW IF THAT IS POSSIBLE.
[04:41:33] >> MY TAKE ON IT IS ULTIMATELY THEY WOULD DECIDE. OUR
[04:41:38] RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO AMEND BECAUSE IT WOULD BE MORE
[04:41:41] SEAMLESS. EITHER WAY THAT WE DO IT, I WANT TO SEIZE THE
[04:41:45] INITIATIVE AND AFFIRMATIVELY GO FORWARD WITH WHAT WE RECOMMEND AS
[04:41:49] THE DIRECTION THAT ALL OF THE PARTIES OF MOU TAKE SO WE DON'T
[04:41:53] SPEND TIME WITHOUT A PROPOSAL ON THE TABLE. OUR INITIAL PROPOSAL
[04:41:57] WOULD BE TO AMEND. I THINK THAT IF WE CAN ALL AGREE ON BASIC
[04:42:04] TERMS OF REVISED MOU FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT, THERE IS NO REAL
[04:42:09] NEED FOR US TO JUST RESCIND THE MOU AND START FROM SCRATCH.
[04:42:19] >> ALL RIGHT. COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY?
[04:42:23] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. THANK YOU FOR EVERYONE THAT
[04:42:30] PROVIDED COMMENTS TODAY THAT IS HERE AND PROVIDED COMMENTS THAT
[04:42:34] WE RECEIVED BY E-MAIL. IT IS IMPORTANT FOR US TO ENGAGE WITH YOU
[04:42:39] AND HEAR WHAT YOUR CONCERNS ARE BEFORE WE MAKE DECISIONS. I
[04:42:42] APPRECIATE THE INPUT I GOT TODAY AND ALL DIALOGUE AND DISCUSSIONS
[04:42:47] AND MEETINGS I HAD BEFORE I CAME IN TODAY. I WANT TO THANK STAFF
[04:42:50] FOR INFORMATION PROVIDED IN STAFF REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS. THIS
[04:42:54] STUFF HAS BEEN GOING ON OBVIOUSLY FOR FIVE OR SIX YEARS AND
[04:42:57] BACKGROUND INFORMATION THAT I WAS APPRECIATIVE AND INFORMATION
[04:43:02] AVAILABLE TO MAKE THESE RECOMMENDATIONS TODAY. I DON'T KNOW IF
[04:43:06] IT HAS BEEN CLARIFIED. THERE IS LOTS OF INPUT RECEIVED ABOUT --
[04:43:11] WHICH I WASN'T TOO CRAZY ABOUT THAT WE HAVEN'T DONE THIS AND
[04:43:14] HAVEN'T DONE THAT AND GETTING A BUNCH OF F GRADES TODAY. I HEAR
[04:43:19] YOUR FRUSTRATION, BUT WE HAVE BEEN DOING A LOT AS A COUNCIL AND
[04:43:23] STAFF HAS BEEN DOING A LOT LAST FEW YEARS. THE MAYOR AND I
[04:43:27] STARTED CONVERSATIONS WITH REDONDO BEACH LATE LAST YEAR AND
[04:43:32] ATTEMPTING TO CONTINUE DIALOGUE WITH REDONDO BEACH AGAIN. I
Page 79 of 94
[04:43:35] THINK WE GOT A LETTER TODAY. WE REQUESTED IT TODAY, AND THEY
[04:43:39] KNOW WE HAVE OUR MEETING TONIGHT. IT WASN'T BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T
[04:43:42] BEEN TRYING DIALOGUE. I'M GLAD WE GOT THAT LETTER. I APOLOGIZE
[04:43:46] IT IS A LITTLE LATE IN THE GAME. IT IS NOT BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T
[04:43:49] BEEN APPROACHING THEM AND TRYING TO WORK THROUGH THESE ISSUES.
[04:43:52] AND I APPRECIATE THE COMMENTS THAT ARE PROVIDED FROM BOTH
[04:43:57] ENDS, KIDS TELLING US HOW IMPORTANT IT IS FOR US TO PROTECT OUR
[04:44:02] ENVIRONMENT FOR THEM AND OUR KIDS AND GRANDKIDS GOING FORWARD AND
[04:44:06] APPRECIATE CONCERN OF THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE CLOSE TO THE AREAS FOR
[04:44:09] PROPOSED LOCATIONS, AND I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS THAT ARE
[04:44:12] RAISED. I DO NOT, HOWEVER, APPRECIATE THE COMMENTARY THAT THE
[04:44:17] REASONS THESE PROJECTS ARE PROPOSED IS BECAUSE NONE OF US LIVE
[04:44:21] THERE. WE LIVE WITH YOU. WE ARE ALL A SMALL COMMUNITY. I HAVE
[04:44:24] BEEN TO A LOT OF YOUR HOUSES AND SOME HAVE BEEN TO MY HOUSE. WE
[04:44:28] ARE MAKING THE DECISION BEST FOR THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY AND ENTIRE
[04:44:32] HERMOSA BEACH AND NOT DISCOUNTING YOU LIVE IN A SPECIFIC AREA. I
[04:44:38] MENTIONED IN OTHER MEETINGS MUCH SMALLER SCALE GREEN STREET
[04:44:42] PROJECT THAT WAS PROPOSED THAT IS EXACTLY IN MY BACKYARD AND
[04:44:47] EXACTLY PROPERTY LINE OF GREEN STREET IS PROPERTY LINE OF MY
[04:44:50] HOUSE. I'M HAPPY TO HAVE THAT INSTALLED. I HOPE THE CITY CAN
[04:44:54] PUT IT TOGETHER, AND I HAVE NO OPPOSITION TO IT. WHEN I HAVE YOU
[04:44:57] HEAR COMMENTS IF IT WASN'T IN YOUR BACKYARD, YOU WOULDN'T DO IT,
[04:45:01] I RESENT THIS COMMENTARY. I DON'T THINK IT APPLIES TO ANY OF US
[04:45:05] OR THE FIVE THAT ARE HERE THAT ARE MAKING THIS DECISION TONIGHT.
[04:45:08] SO I HEAR THE COMMENTS FROM MY COLLEAGUES. YOU KNOW, JEFF
[04:45:12] IS OBVIOUSLY VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THESE ISSUES AND IS PROBABLY
[04:45:17] INVOLVED WITH THE ISSUES LONGER THAN MANY OF US UP HERE. I HEAR
[04:45:22] JUSTIN'S COMMENTS BEING REALISTIC. WE ARE A CITY. THERE ARE 88
[04:45:27] CITIES IN LA COUNTY. WE HAVE TO MAKE DECISIONS AND MEET OUR
[04:45:31] OBLIGATIONS. I HEARD IT. I HEARD THIS IN A PRESENTATION I WAS
[04:45:34] AT A COUPLE WEEKS AGO THAT STUCK WITH ME. BASED ON THIS PROJECT,
[04:45:38] AS ELECTED OFFICIALS, IT IS NOT OUR JOB TO TELL THE PEOPLE THAT
[04:45:43] VOTED FOR US WHAT THEY WANT TO HEAR. IT IS OUR JOB TO TELL YOU
[04:45:46] WHAT YOU NEED TO HEAR. IN THIS CASE, WHAT YOU NEED TO HEAR IS WE
[04:45:50] CAN'T JUST SIMPLY TELL REDONDO BEACH TO TAKE ON THAT OBLIGATION.
[04:45:55] IT IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY. WE CAN'T DO THAT. IT IS NOT AN
[04:45:58] OPTION THE CITY ATTORNEY SPELLED OUT. DOING NOTHING IS NOT AN
[04:46:03] OPTION. WE CAN'T MEET AND TELL COUNCIL TO DO YOUR JOB AND FIND
[04:46:08] ANOTHER PLACE FOR IT. THAT IS WISHFUL THINKING. WE HAVE TO FIND
[04:46:11] ALTERNATIVES THAT WORK AND SATISFY OUR OBLIGATIONS AS A CITY AND
[04:46:17] WORK -- WORK BETTER FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND BETTER FOR PEOPLE THAT
[04:46:20] LIVE IN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUT CAN'T IGNORE IT AND HOPE IT
[04:46:24] GOES AWAY OR DEFLECT OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO ANOTHER CITY. I HEAR
[04:46:28] COMMENTS AND INPUT JUSTIN PROVIDED. I HOPE YOU HAVE IT WRITTEN
[04:46:32] DOWN BECAUSE I'M SUPPORTIVE OF COMMENTS YOU MENTIONED. WE HAVE
[04:46:35] TO HAVE A CLEAR GUIDELINE WHERE WE ARE GOING AND NEED TO HAVE A
[04:46:39] CLEAR PUSH ON THE SCHEDULE SO THAT WE ARE NOT SITTING AROUND AND
Page 80 of 94
[04:46:43] HAVING DISCUSSION THREE OR SIX MONTHS FROM NOW. I THINK MAYOR
[04:46:47] AND I HAVE DONE OUR EFFORTS TO ENGAGE WITH REDONDO BEACH AND NOW
[04:46:53] WE HAVE SPECIFIC PARAMETERS PROVIDED TO US TO CONTINUE ENGAGEMENT
[04:46:59] AND WORK WITH STAFF AND CONSULTANTS GOING FORWARD TO GET
[04:47:03] SUBSTANTIVE ON ACTUAL PLAN WE ARE PROPOSING, BUT, I THINK, THAT
[04:47:07] IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE WE HAVE FOR REASONS MAYOR MENTIONED WHEN
[04:47:11] WE FIRST STARTED CONVERSATION. WE HEAR AND UNDERSTAND OPTION 1
[04:47:15] IS NOT A VIABLE OPTION. WE CANNOT GO WITH OPTION 2. THERE ARE
[04:47:19] LOTS OF THE MISSING FACTS AND PIECES AT THIS STAGE. WE DON'T
[04:47:23] HAVE INFORMATION TO SUPPORT OPTION 2. OPTION 3, AND WITH ALL
[04:47:27] PARAMETERS, AGAIN, JUSTIN LISTED OUT, WE CAN PUT SOMETHING
[04:47:32] TOGETHER TO ALL MOVE FORWARD WITH, AND I WILL FINAL -- I WILL END
[04:47:35] THIS BY SAYING I HAVE HEARD SINCE MARCH OF LAST YEAR THIS HAS
[04:47:41] BEEN GOING ON FOR A YEAR. ONE OF THE SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS I AM
[04:47:44] HEARING FROM THE COMMUNITY IS WE DON'T LET YOU ALL KNOW WHAT IS
[04:47:47] GOING ON AND WE DON'T GIVE YOU ENOUGH NOTICE OR PROVIDE YOU WITH
[04:47:51] ENOUGH INFORMATION OF WHAT WE ARE DOING. YOU ARE RIGHT. WE
[04:47:55] HAVEN'T DONE ENOUGH. I WILL ASK STAFF AND IF MAYOR WANTS US TO
[04:47:59] BE MORE INVOLVED IN PUTTING IN MONTHLY UPDATES OR PRESS RELEASES
[04:48:03] OR WHATEVER. IT IS SOMETHING WE NEED TO DO. WE ARE NOT GIVING
[04:48:06] YOU ENOUGH INFORMATION WHAT WE ARE DOING OR NOTIFYING YOU ENOUGH.
[04:48:09] THE CITY MANAGER HAS LATELY PUT IN PERIODIC UPDATES IN CITY
[04:48:14] MANAGER UPDATES, WHICH I APPRECIATE, BUT WE HAVE TO HAVE MORE
[04:48:17] DIALOGUE IF WE NEED TO SEND SPECIFIC MAILERS TO THOSE THAT LIVE
[04:48:22] IN THE COMMUNITY MAILBOX DON'T HAVE TO WAIT TO GET IT COST AND
[04:48:26] TIME INVOLVED TO DO THAT, BUT I -- EVERY TIME I MEET WITH
[04:48:29] SOMEBODY OR TALK ON THE PHONE, THE FIRST COMMENT I GET IS YOU ARE
[04:48:32] NOT LETTING US KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON, NOT LISTENING TO US, AND
[04:48:37] GIVING US AN OPPORTUNITY TO VOICE CONCERNS AND THOUGHTS TO ME
[04:48:41] THAT IS IMPORTANT. YOU MAY NOT -- I MAY NOT AGREE WITH YOUR
[04:48:45] CONCERNS. AT END OF THE DAY, I OWE IT TO YOU TO LISTEN TO IT.
[04:48:49] IF YOU DON'T KNOW, YOU CAN'T TELL YOUR THOUGHTS, AND WE CAN'T
[04:48:54] LISTEN TO YOUR CONCERNS THAT. IS NOT THE WAY WE SHOULD DO IT.
[04:48:58] THANK YOU.
[04:48:59] >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU TO MY COLLEAGUES FOR YOUR INPUT.
[04:49:02] I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY. I MEAN, AS MUCH
[04:49:07] AS I WANT TO BE APART OF THIS AND DRIVE THIS AND I'M VERY
[04:49:10] MOTIVATED TO DO THAT, I ALSO HEAR FROM YOU OBVIOUSLY YOUR
[04:49:15] CONCERN. YOU GAVE A LOT OF GREAT PARAMETERS. WE ARE WILLING TO
[04:49:20] WORK WITH THOSE PARAMETERS AND DRIVE IT AND BRING IT HOME. THAT
[04:49:23] WILL BE OUR GOAL. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE ON THE SUB-COMMITTEE,
[04:49:27] I'M HAPPY TO STEP BACK AND ALLOW YOU TO HAVE THAT OPPORTUNITY.
[04:49:30] >> I AM TOO, BY THE WAY.
[04:49:33] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[04:49:34] >> I DON'T KNOW WITH THIS GUY. I DON'T KNOW.
[04:49:38] >> [INDISCERNIBLE].
[04:49:39] >> I TRUST YOU BOTH. I THINK THAT WITHIN THE CONFINES OF
Page 81 of 94
[04:49:42] THE BROWN ACT, WHICH I THINK THE FOLKS IN THE ROOM ARE PROBABLY
[04:49:47] INTIMATELY INVOLVED ENOUGH WITH THIS AND TALKED TO US AND
[04:49:51] UNDERSTAND WE AND THE OTHER THREE COUNCILMEMBERS ARE NOT PRIVY TO
[04:49:55] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION YOU MADE TONIGHT UNTIL WE HEARD IT FROM
[04:50:00] YOU TONIGHT WITH BROWN ACT. IT HAS TO BE A TEAM EFFORT WITH FIVE
[04:50:05] OF US WITH OUTREACH TO JANIS HAHN AND SENATOR ALAN. I THINK
[04:50:12] THERE IS A WAY DO THAT VIA STAFF, BUT I TRUST YOU. YOU ARE BOTH
[04:50:18] VERY SMART AND YOU HAVE GOOD WORKING RELATIONSHIPS WITH ALL OF
[04:50:21] OUR COUNTERPARTS IN THE BEACH CITIES WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GROUP
[04:50:27] AND MOU. I'M FULLY SUPPORTIVE IN HOWEVER YOU WANT, BUT I TRUST
[04:50:34] YOU GOING FORWARD.
[04:50:36] >> OKAY. WE BETTER DELIVER.
[04:50:38] >> AUDIENCE: [LAUGHING].
[04:50:40] >> YEAH. WE DON'T TAKE THAT RESPONSIBILITY LIGHTLY. WE
[04:50:43] WILL DELIVER. ALL RIGHT. LET'S NOT CELEBRATE YET. WE WILL STAY
[04:50:49] VERY POSITIVE AND WORK VERY HARD ON OUR COLLECTIVE BEHALF. WITH
[04:50:52] THAT, DO WE HAVE A MOTION, COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY?
[04:50:57] >> SURE, MADAME MAYOR.
[04:50:59] >> THANK YOU.
[04:51:01] >> PARDON ME. I MOVE THAT WE INITIATE AN AMENDMENT OR
[04:51:10] DISSOLUTION OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING
[04:51:14] GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT TO NEGOTIATE SUITABLE SUBSTITUTE
[04:51:19] OR REVISED MOU AND PROJECT WITH THE CITY'S PARTNERS.
[04:51:28] >> ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
[04:51:31] >> I'LL SECOND.
[04:51:33] >> ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[04:51:37] >> AYE.
[04:51:39] >> OPPOSED?
[04:51:40] >> NO.
[04:51:41] >> ALL RIGHT.
[04:51:42] >> ALTHOUGH, LET ME ADD.
[04:51:43] >> YES.
[04:51:44] >> I WILL HELP MY COLLEAGUES IN EVERY WAY POSSIBLE TO MAKE
[04:51:47] SURE WE ARE SUCCESSFUL.
[04:51:48] >> THANK YOU. THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH FOR BEING HERE. WE
[04:51:51] WILL TAKE A QUICK FIVE OR SEVEN-MINUTE BREAK. WE WILL BE BACK AT
[05:00:17] --.
[05:00:18] >> [HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL IN RECESS].
[05:03:36] >> ALL RIGHT. PAGING COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY. THANK YOU,
[05:03:41] KIND SIR.
[05:03:42] >> MADAM MAYOR, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE
[05:03:46] CONTINUE THE MEETING TO 11 O'CLOCK.
[05:03:48] >> DO HAVE A SECOND?
[05:03:50] >> SECOND.
[05:03:51] >> ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[05:03:53] >> AYE.
[05:03:54] >> ALL RIGHT. MADAME CLERK?
Page 82 of 94
[05:03:57] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. WE WILL GO BACK TO THE CONSENT
[05:04:01] CALENDAR ITEMS NOW OR MOVE AHEAD. WHAT WOULD YOU PREFER?
[05:04:05] >> MOVE AHEAD.
[05:04:07] >> MOVING AHEAD IS JUST MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS, WHICH ARE
[05:04:12] IMPORTANT, COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY, BUT LET'S GO TO THE CONSENT
[05:04:16] CALENDAR.
[05:04:17] >> YEAH.
[05:04:18] >> SO WE HAD --
[05:04:19] >> IT WAS J, L, AND P; CORRECT?
[05:04:25] >> YES.
[05:04:26] >> ALL RIGHT. ITEM 2J, THIS WAS PULLED BY COUNCILMEMBER
[05:04:33] FANGARY ACTION PUBLIC WORKS MINUTES OF JANUARY 16, 2016.
[05:04:44] >> THANK YOU. SO I PULLED THIS ITEM SPECIFICALLY. THIS IS
[05:04:48] OBVIOUSLY -- THIS IS THE ACTION MINUTES FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS
[05:04:52] COMMISSION. I PULLED THIS ITEM SPECIFICALLY FOR ITEM NO. I GUESS
[05:05:09] 8B, WHICH IS THE REQUEST TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO NOT
[05:05:14] INSTALL BALLARDS ON THE STRAND AT 11TH STREET AND ACCEPT
[05:05:19] INSTALLATION OF PAVEMENT MARKINGS INSTEAD TO KEEP THE
[05:05:23] INTERSECTION CLEAR. SO I -- SO JUST TO GIVE MY COLLEAGUES A
[05:05:28] QUICK BACKGROUND, THIS IS RELATING TO BALLARDS ON THE STRAND. I
[05:05:33] HAD TO GO BACK AND DO SOME HOMEWORK ON OUR PRIOR POSITION. IN
[05:05:39] FEBRUARY 2016, THIS COUNCIL ACCEPTED THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF
[05:05:42] PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION TO INSTALL BALLARDS AT 6 DIFFERENT
[05:05:48] ENTRANCES AT THE STRAND. I HAD TO GO BACK AND LOOK AT STAFF
[05:05:52] REPORT PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION OF JANUARY OF THIS YEAR. LOOKS
[05:05:56] LIKE THAT RECOMMENDATION HAS CHANGED AND GATES BEING DESIGNED AND
[05:06:01] POTENTIALLY INSTALLED. I GOT WORD THINGS GOING ON, ON COUNCIL
[05:06:07] NOT AUTHORIZED WITH COUNCIL AND INCONSISTENT WITH COUNCIL
[05:06:12] DIRECTION AND HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH PUBLIC WORKS AND CITY MANAGER
[05:06:17] AND MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THESE BEING EVALUATED TO PUBLIC WORKS
[05:06:21] COMMISSION WILL BE BROUGHT TO COUNCIL FOR EVALUATION AND
[05:06:24] DISCUSSION BEFORE THEY IMPLEMENT IT. I WANT TO MAKE SURE TO
[05:06:28] CONFIRM THAT IS CURRENT STATUS APPEARED LOOKING TO ME PUBLIC
[05:06:32] WORKS STAFF REPORT THIS YEAR AND RECOMMENDATION SPECIFICALLY
[05:06:36] REGARDING 11TH STREET. IT WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY LINKED TO HAVING
[05:06:39] IT BEING BROUGHT TO COUNCIL FOR DIRECTION. I WANT TO CLARIFY AND
[05:06:44] MAKE SURE THAT IS THE CASE. THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING POTENTIALLY
[05:06:48] MENTION ON BEHALF OF -- IF MY COLLEAGUES DON'T HAVE OTHER
[05:06:53] COMMENTS, I WANT TO CONFIRM THAT IS THE DIRECTION GOING FORWARD,
[05:06:57] AND I MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES.
[05:07:01] >> I WILL SECOND.
[05:07:05] >> GOOD EVENING.
[05:07:07] >> OH.
[05:07:08] >> I WANT TO -- YES. THAT IS CORRECT. THIS WAS DONE IN
[05:07:11] TWO PARTS APPROACHING PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION IN NOVEMBER AND IN
[05:07:17] JANUARY.
[05:07:18] AND UNDER DIFFERENT -- A DIFFERENT DIRECTOR, SO WHAT I --
Page 83 of 94
[05:07:24] WHAT I WAS ABLE TO PULL TODAY ARE THE INFORMATION THAT WE SHOULD
[05:07:31] -- I FEEL WE SHOULD REVISIT PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION TO GET A
[05:07:35] BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE DESIGN OF PLANS FOR -- FOR THE
[05:07:43] BALLARDS, AND WE NEED TO COME BACK TO COUNCIL FOR THE RESOLUTION
[05:07:48] THAT NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO -- TO COASTAL COMMISSION FOR THE
[05:07:55] PERMIT THAT WE NEED.
[05:07:56] >> OKAY. THANK YOU. SINCE YOU ARE HERE, I HAVE A QUICK
[05:08:01] QUESTION FOR YOU. I -- THROUGH MY EVALUATION OF THE STAFF REPORT
[05:08:04] AND DISCUSSIONS WITH PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSIONERS, I HAVEN'T BEEN
[05:08:08] ABLE TO GRASP A GOOD CONCEPT OF IT. IN THE STAFF REPORTS FOR THE
[05:08:13] PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY MEETING, THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO MARK THE
[05:08:18] AREA ON THE STRAND BY ELEVENTH STREET AND BASICALLY PAINT ON THE
[05:08:24] STRAND FLOOR, KEEP CLEAR. AS I LOOK AT THE PICTURE IN THE STAFF
[05:08:30] REPORT, IT IS HARD FOR ME TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT WOULD MEAN TO A
[05:08:34] PEDESTRIAN WALKING ON THE STRAND. I KNOW WHAT KEEP CLEAR MEANS
[05:08:40] DRIVING CAR STOP LIGHT AND KEEP IT DIRECTLY SO CARS CAN GO ACROSS
[05:08:45] WHILE WAITING FOR THE LIGHT BUT DON'T KNOW WHAT IT MEANS TO
[05:08:49] PEDESTRIANS WHAT IMPACT IT WILL HAVE, AND I DIDN'T WATCH THE
[05:08:53] MEETING ON PUBLIC WORKS IN JANUARY. I'M MISSING AN EXPLANATION
[05:08:56] THERE. I'M LEFT WITH A PUZZLING LOOK WHEN I LOOK AT THAT
[05:09:00] PICTURE. IF I WALK ON THE STRAND OR 11TH STREET AND THERE'S A
[05:09:03] SIGN ON THE SAND THAT SAYS KEEP CLEAR, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN, STOP
[05:09:07] OR WAIT? AN EXPLANATION I GOT WAS MAYBE SHOULDN'T LOITER AROUND.
[05:09:12] EMERGENCY CARS CAN USE THAT TO GO THROUGH TO THE BEACH. SINCE
[05:09:16] I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH IT, I DON'T KNOW HOW OUR RESIDENTS OR
[05:09:19] VISITORS WOULD UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MEANS. I WOULD LIKE WHEN HE
[05:09:22] COMES BACK DO US FOR CONSIDERATION OR UNLESS YOU WANT TO RESPOND
[05:09:26] TO IT NOW AN EXPLANATION WHY THAT WAS RECOMMENDED AND HOW
[05:09:29] COMFORTABLE WE ARE THAT WILL BE EFFECTIVE AND UNDERSTOOD BY OUR
[05:09:34] RESIDENTS OR VISITORS MARK ON STRAND FLOOR KEEP CLEAR AND HOW
[05:09:39] MESSAGE WILL GET ACROSS.
[05:09:41] >> COUNCILMEMBER, IF I MAY, I THINK SINCE WE DON'T HAVE
[05:09:44] BENEFIT OF A FULL STAFF REPORT, WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GIVE YOU
[05:09:47] BITS AND PIECES OF WHAT THE THINKING WAS FROM THE PRIOR TIMES WE
[05:09:53] HAVE GONE TO COMMISSION. I THINK IT WOULD BE BEST FOR US TO
[05:09:57] REGROUP AND BRING THE ITEM FORWARD TO THE COUNCIL AND HAVE A FULL
[05:10:01] DISCUSSION. THERE ARE CHALLENGES WITH THE BALLARDS WE WERE ABLE
[05:10:05] TO SHARE WITH YOU THAT WERE NOT ANTICIPATED NECESSARILY WHEN
[05:10:10] BALLARDS WERE SELECTED THOSE ARE UPDATES WE WOULD LIKE TO BRING
[05:10:14] TO YOU. YOU ARE RIGHT MESSAGING KEEP CLEAR WHAT COULD THAT
[05:10:19] POSSIBLY MEAN? WE WILL AFTER LOOKING AT RECOMMENDATIONS WE CAN
[05:10:25] HAVE A DIFFERENT SIGNAGE OR HAVE EXPLANATION WITH YOU WHAT
[05:10:28] GENERAL INTERPRETATION OF THAT COULD MEAN. I HAVE INTERPRETATION
[05:10:33] I WOULD STAY CLEAR OF THAT AREA IF SHARING WITH ME. THAT MIGHT
[05:10:37] NOT BE GENERAL INTERPRETATION. WE WILL HAVE TO LOOK AT THAT ON
[05:10:41] THE FLY [INDISCERNIBLE] HAS DONE A GREAT JOB TO PULL TOGETHER
[05:10:44] RESPONSES. I WANT TO THANK HIM FOR THAT. I THINK WE SHOULD COME
Page 84 of 94
[05:10:49] BACK TO YOU MORE PROPERLY AND FORMALLY.
[05:10:51] >> UNDERSTOOD. WITH THAT, IF NONE OF MY COLLEAGUES HAVE
[05:10:54] ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS, I CAN --
[05:10:56] >> MAKE A MOTION.
[05:10:57] >> I CAN MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE
[05:11:00] PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION.
[05:11:02] >> I'LL SECOND IT.
[05:11:03] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[05:11:05] >> AYE.
[05:11:07] >> MADAM CLERK?
[05:11:09] >> THANK YOU. NEXT IS -- OOPS. THERE IT IS. ITEM 2L,
[05:11:18] AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR CIP 17687 AND CIP 18691 ADA
[05:11:27] IMPROVEMENTS ON PROSPECT AVENUE AND THIS WAS ALSO PULLED BY
[05:11:33] COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY. THANK YOU.
[05:11:36] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. I JUST WANT A QUICK CORRECTION
[05:11:39] THAT IT REQUESTS 2I. I DID IT INCORRECTLY. 2L IS THE CORRECT
[05:11:43] NUMBER. THANKS FOR CATCHING MY ERROR THERE. THE ONLY REASON FOR
[05:11:47] PULLING THIS ITEM OUT OF CONSENT WAS PROCEDURALLY WE HAVE ADOPTED
[05:11:51] A PROTOCOL BACK IN 2017 FOR CONTRACTING PURPOSES ANY CONTRACT
[05:11:57] AMOUNTS THAT EXCEED $100,000 SHOULDN'T BE PUT ON CONSENT ITEM PUT
[05:12:03] BROUGHT TO MUSICAL MATTERS. I DON'T HAVE ISSUES OR CONCERN WITH
[05:12:06] THIS CONTRACT EXCEPT, AGAIN, PROCEDURALLY THAT IS OUR PROTOCOL.
[05:12:11] I WANTED TO PULL THE ITEM OUT AND SCOPE OF WORK DEALT WITH ADA
[05:12:17] IMPROVEMENTS GOOD TO GIVE RESIDENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS WE ARE
[05:12:26] IMPROVING ADA IMPROVEMENTS. IT DOESN'T HURT TO HAVE IT RATHER AS
[05:12:31] A CONSENT ITEM. THAT IS ONLY REASON I BROUGHT IT OUT. AGAIN,
[05:12:35] UNLESS COLLEAGUES HAVE QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS OR DISCUSSIONS ABOUT
[05:12:38] IT, I'M HAPPY TO MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THAT AWARD OF
[05:12:42] CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR CIP 17687 AND CIP 18691.
[05:12:50] >> OKAY.
[05:12:51] >> YEAH. MAYOR PRO TEM?
[05:12:54] >> EXCUSE ME. WE DO HAVE SOMEONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK
[05:12:56] ON THIS ITEM.
[05:12:57] >> OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[05:12:59] >> DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION?
[05:13:01] >> I DO HAVE A QUESTION. I GUESS, WELL, I -- IT COULD WAIT
[05:13:06] UNTIL AFTER PUBLIC COMMENT. IT WAS ABOUT THE PROTOCOL. I WILL
[05:13:10] WAIT.
[05:13:11] >> UNDERSTOOD. OKAY. WE WILL OPEN IT UP. GOOD EVENING.
[05:13:18] >> HI. I'M KEN [INDISCERNIBLE] ON 522 PROSPECT. I SENT
[05:13:23] YOU ALL A LETTER BACK IN AUGUST 2015 ABOUT THIS PROJECT. I WANT
[05:13:27] TO THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT. TRAFFIC MOVES PRETTY QUICK.
[05:13:31] LOTS OF KIDS IN THAT AREA.
[05:13:33] I HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH FABIO AND KIND OF GETTING UPDATES.
[05:13:38] HE HAS BEEN GREAT ON LETTING ME KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON IT TAKE
[05:13:43] AIDES WHILE TO GET SOME OF THESE THINGS DONE. JUSTIN YOU ALWAYS
[05:13:47] LET ME HAVE YOUR EAR ON THIS TOPIC. I WANT TO THANK YOU ABOUT IT
Page 85 of 94
[05:13:51] TOO. WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT TIMES. I HOPE IT GETS APPROVED AND
[05:13:56] MOVED FORWARD SOON. THANK YOU.
[05:13:57] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYONE ELSE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT?
[05:14:01] ALL RIGHT. SEEING NO ONE. I WILL BRING IT BACK FOR A MOTION OR
[05:14:06] SORRY.
[05:14:07] >> QUESTION.
[05:14:08] >> YOU HAD A QUESTION, MAYOR PRO TEM?
[05:14:11] >> YEAH. ACTUALLY, I WANT TO RE-ENFORCE COUNCILMEMBER
[05:14:16] FANGARY'S. WHEN I SAW THIS AND EVERY TIME I SEE ONE THAT EXCEEDS
[05:14:20] OUR PROTOCOL, I THINK OF YOU. WHEN I WONDERED WHEN I LOOKED AT
[05:14:25] THIS ONE IS WHETHER OR NOT OUR PROTOCOL HAD ANY NUANCES. FOR
[05:14:31] EXAMPLE, THESE WERE MAYBE BUNDLED INTO ALL KINDS OF STREET
[05:14:35] IMPROVEMENTS AND SEVERAL ROUNDS OF THAT. IF THAT WOULD BE MAYBE
[05:14:38] -- THERE WOULD BE LESS OF A NEED TO PULL THOSE OUT OF CONSENT.
[05:14:43] BUT ON THE OTHER HAND, I ACTUALLY LIKE THE FACT THAT IT IS
[05:14:48] BEING HIGHLIGHTED. IT IS A SIGNIFICANT CIP IMPROVEME NT THAT DOES
[05:14:53] MAKE A DIFFERENCE. IT IS -- YOU KNOW, IT IS NOT A SMALL PROJECT.
[05:14:58] THAT IS JUST MY WEIGHING IN. I DON'T -- I'M NOT ARGUING TO
[05:15:02] CHANGE THE PROTOCOL. I'M TRYING TO GET CLARIFICATION ON THE
[05:15:05] PROTOCOL, I GUESS.
[05:15:08] >> MADAME CITY MANAGER?
[05:15:11] >> SO I THINK IF I'M UNDERSTANDING COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY
[05:15:16] CORRECTLY, THE PROTOCOL THAT COUNCILMEMBER IS REFERRING TO IS
[05:15:20] PART OF A STRATEGIC PLANNING LEADERS THAT I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS
[05:15:26] CALLED THE LEADERS GUIDE. LEADERS GUIDE FROM 2016/2017.
[05:15:32] AT THAT TIME, THE DESCRIPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR REALLY
[05:15:41] CAME UP AS A GUIDELINE FOR WHEN COUNCILMEMBERS WOULD PULL ITEMS
[05:15:45] OFF OF CONSENT. UNDER THAT, IT IDENTIFIED FOUR OR FIVE
[05:15:51] CATEGORIES OR PROTOCOLS AS TO WHAT WOULD BE ON CONSENT. ONE IS
[05:15:58] THE LAST ONE IS ITEMS WITH AN EXPENDITURE THRESHOLD OF $100,000.
[05:16:04] AND SO THIS, OF COURSE, VARIES ACROSS CITIES. THAT IS WHAT
[05:16:08] WAS CONSIDERED AT THE TIME. WHAT I WANTED TO SHARE ABOUT THIS
[05:16:12] PARTICULAR PROJECT IS NOT BECAUSE IT OVERLOOKED THE PROTOCOL, BUT
[05:16:19] THIS -- THIS IS A PROJECT WHERE TWICE BEFORE IT HAS COME BEFORE
[05:16:23] THE COUNCIL THROUGH THE CDBG FUNDING. WE BUNDLED THE FUNDS FOR
[05:16:29] TWO YEARS, BUT THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED AND COUNCIL HAS
[05:16:32] APPROVED IT TWICE BEFORE. IN THAT REGARD, UNDER THE DISCRETION
[05:16:37] THAT I THINK YOU HAVE GIVEN ME, I'M PRETTY SURE YOU HAVE GIVEN
[05:16:40] ME, I'M ABLE TO INTERPRET THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY
[05:16:44] ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL. SO PLACING IT ON CONSENT IS NOT OUT OF
[05:16:50] LINE WITH YOUR DIRECTION, YOUR APPROVAL.
[05:16:53] I THINK THERE IS ALSO PERHAPS A CONCERN ABOUT WHAT IS A
[05:16:57] ROUTINE MATTER AND WHAT IS NOT.
[05:17:00] THERE IS NO DEFINITION OF ROUTINE HERE. I THINK IF WE LOOK
[05:17:04] ACROSS CITIES THAT DO HAVE SOME HANDBOOK FOR COUNCILMEMBERS AND
[05:17:09] MAYORS AND COUNCILMEMBERS ON VARIOUS MATTERS AND HOW TO CONDUCT
[05:17:14] MEETINGS AND PULL CONSENT ITEMS I DON'T THINK THERE IS A
Page 86 of 94
[05:17:19] DEFINITION WHAT ROUTINE IS. THAT IS REALLY KIND OF DIFFICULT TO
[05:17:23] DEFINE.
[05:17:24] AND SO AS A STAFF PERSON AND AS YOUR STAFF PERSON, WHAT I
[05:17:28] WOULD DO IS LOOK TO WHETHER IT WAS SOMETHING YOU HAVE WEIGHED IN
[05:17:31] ON PREVIOUSLY AND YOU HAVE GIVEN CLEAR DIRECTION. IF IT IS
[05:17:35] SOMETHING THAT IS A LEGISLATIVE MATTER, WHETHER WE ARE
[05:17:38] RECOMMENDING A SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION POSITION ON A BILL. IF IT
[05:17:42] IS IN ALIGNMENT WITH YOUR POLICIES AND YOUR DIRECTION, THAT WOULD
[05:17:47] BE A ROUTINE MATTER FROM STAFF'S STANDPOINT. SO THAT IS WHERE
[05:17:51] THIS ITEM FOR $141,000 APPEARS BEFORE YOU. IT APPEARED BEFORE
[05:17:56] YOU IN TWO PIECES ABOUT $70,000 EACH PREVIOUSLY.
[05:18:02] >> OKAY. THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR.
[05:18:06] >> MY FOLLOW UP COMMENT WOULD BE THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I WAS
[05:18:10] REACHING FOR AND WHAT I TAKE AWAY FROM YOUR COMMENTS, YOUR
[05:18:13] ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IS THAT I KNOW THAT SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES
[05:18:18] HAVE ON OCCASION NOT PULLED AN ITEM, BUT THEY HAVE MADE A COMMENT
[05:18:24] AS WE ARE APPROVING THE CONSENT CALENDAR WHERE THEY MIGHT CALL
[05:18:28] OUT SOMETHING LIKE A SIGNIFICANT, YOU KNOW, MAKE A COMMENT
[05:18:33] INSTEAD OF PULL IT.
[05:18:35] SO THAT FEELS RIGHT TO ME JUST FOR CONSIDERATION. YOU
[05:18:40] HAVING THE JUDGMENT TO PUT IT ON CONSENT MAKES SENSE TO ME. IF
[05:18:44] THERE IS ANY ADDED VALUE TO KIND OF BE ABLE TO HIGHLIGHT IF W E
[05:18:50] FEEL IT IS IMPORTANT TO THE COMMUNITY, I WOULD BE COMFORTABLE
[05:18:53] WITH THAT PROTOCOL.
[05:18:56] >> MADAM MAYOR, IF I MAY?
[05:18:57] >> YES.
[05:18:58] >> I WOULDN'T BE COMFORTABLE WITH THE PROTOCOL. NEITHER
[05:19:02] ONE OF YOU WAS IN THE DISCUSSION. I WILL BRING IT AROUND, JEFF
[05:19:05] AND JUSTIN, AND I HAD FURTHER DISCUSSION, EXPANDED DISCUSSION.
[05:19:11] MIKE WAS THERE TOO FOUR OR FIVE DAYS MOST STRATEGIC PLANNING. WE
[05:19:16] HAVE DONE DOCUMENT I SENT TO CITY MANAGER AND THE MAYOR DOESN'T
[05:19:20] GIVE DISCRETION. IT SAYS EXPENDITURE THRESHOLD, NO DISCRETION.
[05:19:24] FOLLOW PROTOCOL OR WE DON'T. IF WE WANT TO CHANGE IT, WE CAN.
[05:19:28] THE PROTOCOL ADOPTED MAJORITY VOTED FOR IT. WE HAVE TO STICK
[05:19:32] WITH PROTOCOL THAT IS PROTOCOL. THAT IS WHAT IT SAYS, STICK WITH
[05:19:38] IT. APPROVED IT -- IT SPECIFICALLY SAYS EXPENDITURE THRESHOLD
[05:19:46] NOT DISCRETIONARY THRESHOLD. IF 100,000 NOT PUT IT ON CONSENT IF
[05:19:54] ON CONSENT PULL IT AND DO THIS ON A REGULAR BASIS OR COUNCIL CAN
[05:19:58] MAKE DECISION EVALUATE THIS NOT TONIGHT BUT TIME IN FUTURE CHANGE
[05:20:04] PROTOCOL AND HAVE FLEXIBILITY IF WE WANTED. THANK YOU, MAYOR.
[05:20:10] >> WOULD YOU BE OPEN -- WORKING WITH CITY MANAGER TO LOOK
[05:20:14] AT WHAT THE PROTOCOL IS AND MAYBE JUST TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT IT
[05:20:20] AND SEE IF WE CAN CLARIFY SOME OF THE POINTS OR REVISIT SOME OF
[05:20:24] THE POINTS AND BRING IT BACK AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING.
[05:20:27] >> ABSOLUTELY. AS LONG AS WHAT WE ARE DOING IS CONSISTENT
[05:20:30] WITH THE PROTOCOL, I'M FINE WITH IT. WHATEVER YOU FEEL WOULD BE
[05:20:34] A GOOD EFFICIENT WAY TO ADJUST THE PROTOCOL, THAT IS TOTALLY FINE
Page 87 of 94
[05:20:39] WITH ME. NOT A PROBLEM.
[05:20:40] >> SORRY TO CLARIFY. DO YOU WANT US TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT
[05:20:43] AND MODIFY IT AND BRING IT BACK FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL?
[05:20:46] >> NO. THAT IS TOTALLY FINE.
[05:20:48] >> NO. YES. OR NO. SORRY.
[05:20:50] >> YES.
[05:20:51] >> OKAY.
[05:20:52] >> COUNCIL HAS TO VOTE MAJORITY OF COUNCIL VOTED IN
[05:20:55] PROTOCOL. MAJORITY HAS TO ADJUST IT. SUB-COMMITTEE
[05:21:00] RECOMMENDATION ADOPTION BY COUNCIL, I'M TOTALLY FINE WITH THAT.
[05:21:03] >> MADAM CITY MANAGER, ARE YOU OKAY WITH THAT WORK WITH
[05:21:07] MAYOR PRO TEM AND MYSELF TO TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT IT AND BRING IT
[05:21:12] BACK?
[05:21:13] >> ABSOLUTELY. I THINK THAT IS COMPLETELY APPROPRIATE.
[05:21:14] YOU ARE A NEW BODY, SO DEFINITELY NEW BODY FROM ONE THAT CAME UP
[05:21:19] WITH THIS. I DO, COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY. IF I MAY, MADAME MAYOR,
[05:21:24] ON THE LIST OF FIVE, I LOOKED AT ITEM 3, ITEMS WITH PRIOR COUNCIL
[05:21:32] DECISION OR DIRECTION OR SUPPORT THAT DIRECTION TO MAKE THE
[05:21:37] DETERMINATION THAT THIS WAS A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED COUNCIL
[05:21:42] DIRECTED ACTION. I DID NOT JUST LOOK AT ITEM 5 AS THE SOLE
[05:21:46] REASON TO -- TO NOT PUT IT ON CONSENT BUT I LOOKED AT THE FACT
[05:21:51] THAT THIS COUNCIL MADE A DECISION PREVIOUSLY TWICE ON THAT POINT.
[05:21:55] IT IS DIFFERENT. I -- FOR ME, SO --
[05:22:00] >> OKAY.
[05:22:01] >> POINT MADE. UNDERSTOOD. THANK YOU.
[05:22:04] >> ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A MOTION?
[05:22:06] >> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE CONTRACT. I JUST
[05:22:12] LOST MY PAGE HERE. UM, I WILL TAKE A MOTION TO RECEIVE ON FILE,
[05:22:17] I GUESS, THE REPORT. IS THAT WHAT I NEED TO DO, MADAME CLERK?
[05:22:22] >> I WILL SECOND, MADAME MAYOR.
[05:22:25] >> TO AWARD THE CONTRACT.
[05:22:27] >> TO AWARD THE CONTRACT AND RECOMMEND ACTION ON STAFF
[05:22:33] REPORT.
[05:22:34] >> I WILL SECOND IT.
[05:22:35] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[05:22:36] >> AYE.
[05:22:37] >> IF I MAY, KEN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE.
[05:22:42] >> [INDISCERNIBLE].
[05:22:43] >> NOT ONLY THAT BUT TONIGHT WAITING THROUGH THE ENTIRE
[05:22:45] MEETING FOR US.
[05:22:46] >> AND GIVING US THANKS ON TOP OF THAT.
[05:22:49] >> RIGHT. I'M NOT SURE IF WE DESERVE IT, BUT THANK YOU.
[05:22:51] >> YOUR CIVICS LESSON FOR THE YEAR THERE, YOU ARE. THANK
[05:22:56] YOU FOR BEARING WITH US. ALL RIGHT. MADAME CLERK.
[05:23:01] >> ITEM 2P, ALSO PULLED BY COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY IS THE
[05:23:10] NORTH SCHOOL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT SUB-COMMITTEE AND MEMORANDUM
[05:23:13] OF UNDERSTANDING FULFILLMENT OVERSIGHT ROLE.
Page 88 of 94
[05:23:18] >> THANK YOU, MADAME CLERK. THIS IS DIFFERENT FROM THE
[05:23:21] LAST TWO. I'M PULLING THIS ITEM. I WON'T SUPPORT IT AS MY
[05:23:25] COLLEAGUES KNOW I DID NOT SUPPORT A PROCESS THAT CITY COUNCIL AND
[05:23:31] SCHOOL DISTRICT AND SCHOOL BOARD HAVE BEEN GOING THROUGH SINCE
[05:23:35] LATE JANUARY OR EARLY FEBRUARY. MY PREFERENCE WOULD HAVE BEEN
[05:23:39] FOR US TO WORK THROUGH THE ISSUES EARLIER ON RATHER THAN ENTERING
[05:23:43] A MILL OF UNDERSTANDING. I'M NOT SUPPORTING THIS MOTION AND
[05:23:46] UNLIKELY TO SUPPORT OTHER SUBSEQUENT MOTIONS THAT FOLLOW THE SAME
[05:23:50] PRIOR DIRECTION FROM COUNCIL. I WILL GUESS SOMEBODY ELSE WILL
[05:23:53] HAVE TO MAKE THE MOTION TO ACCEPT THIS. I WOULD BE A NO.
[05:23:57] >> ALL RIGHT. MAYOR PRO TEM?
[05:23:59] >> THANK YOU. MADAME MAYOR, I MOVE THAT THE COUNCIL --
[05:24:05] THAT THE NORTH SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SUB-COMMITTEE MEMBERS
[05:24:08] RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE SUB-COMMITTEE TO
[05:24:12] CONTINUE TO SERVE AS THE COUNCIL'S REPRESENTATIVES ON JOINT CITY
[05:24:16] AND HERMOSA SCHOOL BEACH CITY COLLABORATIVE CHARGED WITH
[05:24:20] OVERSEEING FULFILLMENT OF NORTH SCHOOL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
[05:24:24] MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING EXECUTED FEBRUARY 27TH, 2019.
[05:24:28] >> A SECOND.
[05:24:30] >> MADAM MAYOR, IF I MIGHT?
[05:24:32] >> COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY.
[05:24:34] >> MAYOR PRO TEM, CAN I CLARIFY ARE YOU MOVING THE COUNCIL
[05:24:38] AUTHORIZE THE SUB-COMMITTEE TO CONTINUE TO SERVE YOU ARE NOT
[05:24:41] MOVING THAT THE SUB-COMMITTEE RECOMMEND THAT THE COUNCIL
[05:24:44] AUTHORIZE A SUB-COMMITTEE TO CONTINUE TO SERVE?
[05:24:47] >> YEAH. THAT IS WHY I WAS TRIPPING ON THAT SENTENCE.
[05:24:50] >> ALL RIGHT. I WANTED TO CLARIFY.
[05:24:52] >> THANK YOU.
[05:24:53] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR.
[05:24:56] >> I WILL SECOND, MADAME MAYOR.
[05:24:58] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[05:25:00] >> AYE.
[05:25:01] >> OPPOSED?
[05:25:02] >> NO.
[05:25:03] >> ALL RIGHT. MADAME CLERK.
[05:25:12] >> THANK YOU. NEXT IS MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING
[05:25:16] ATTENDANCE REPORTS CITY COUNCIL. WE HAVE COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY
[05:25:21] PROVIDING US ON UPDATE ON MEETING WITH SENATOR SCOTT WIENER'S
[05:25:27] LEGISLATIVE A TO DISCUSS SENATE BILL 50.
[05:25:31] >> COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY?
[05:25:34] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. I WAS IN SACRAMENTO LAST WEEK.
[05:25:42] I TOOK THE TIME TO SIT DOWN WITH THE SENATOR WIENER LEGISLATIVE 8
[05:25:50] TO GO OVER SENATE BILL 50 AND WANTED TO SHARE WITH MY COLLEAGUES
[05:25:54] THAT DISCUSSION. IT WASN'T CLEAR TO ME UNTIL I SAT DOWN WITH HER
[05:25:58] AND HAD HER GO THROUGH THE PROCESS WITH ME A LITTLE BIT. BEFORE
[05:26:01] I GO THERE, I WILL MENTION A COUPLE QUICK BACKGROUND. MAYOR PRO
[05:26:06] TEM AND I SERVE AS DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE OF THE CITY BEFORE THE
Page 89 of 94
[05:26:11] SOUTH BAY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AND THEY HAVE ISSUED LETTER OF
[05:26:17] OPPOSITION ATTACHED HERE DATED FEBRUARY 20TH, 2019, IT WAS SENT
[05:26:22] TO SENATOR WIENER APPOSING SENATE BILL 50. I ALSO SERVE AS
[05:26:27] CITY'S REPRESENT ITIVE TO CONTRACT CITY'S ASSOCIATION LEGISLATIVE
[05:26:32] COMMITTEE THAT MEETS ONCE A MONTH TO GO OVER WHATEVER VARIOUS
[05:26:36] PENDING LEGISLATION. THIS LEGISLATION IS ALSO ON OUR LIST AND
[05:26:41] THE CONTRACT CITY'S LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE HAS DECIDED TO PUT A
[05:26:49] HOLD ON THE BILL TO ALLOW US TO CONTINUE DIALOGUE WITH SENATOR
[05:26:52] WIENER AND STAFF. INSTEAD OF OPPOSING IT WE DECIDED TO OBSERVE
[05:26:56] IT IF YOU WILL AND CONTINUE DIALOGUE. OPPOSITION TWO BODIES
[05:27:01] REPRESENT LOTS OF THE CITIES ON THIS BILL. WHEN I SAT DOWN WITH
[05:27:05] LEGISLATIVE AID, THE CLARIFICATION TO ME WAS THAT THIS BILL
[05:27:09] CONTRARY TO THE LAST YEAR'S 827 BILL MAKES IT A LOT MORE CLEARER
[05:27:16] DISTINCTION BETWEEN CITIES THAT HAVE BUS ROUTES AND CITIES THAT
[05:27:21] HAVE RAIL ROUTES IN A WAY IT WAS EXPLAINED TO ME BY THE
[05:27:25] LEGISLATIVE AIDE WAS FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, IF THIS BILL
[05:27:31] PASSES, IT WOULDN'T CHANGE HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS OF BUILDINGS IN
[05:27:34] THE CITY. IT WOULD CHANGE DENSITY AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS, SO
[05:27:38] IN AN AREA WHERE 30-FOOT HEIGHT LIMIT WITH R2 LOT. FOR EXAMPLE,
[05:27:44] THAT WOULD BASICALLY STAY AT 30-FOOT HEIGHT LIMIT, BUT R2 WOULD
[05:27:49] GO AWAY AND DEVELOPER WOULD BUILD WHATEVER, HOWEVER MANY UNITS IT
[05:27:53] CAN FIT AND IF R2 LOT HAD A FOUR PARKING SPOT REQUIREMENT, THAT
[05:27:59] WOULD GO AWAY. BUILDING COULD BE ERECTED WITH NO PARKING SPOTS
[05:28:05] AND WHOEVER LIVED THERE HAS TO RECTIFY OWN PARKING RESTRICTION
[05:28:10] AND PUT INTO THE BILL TO MAKE SURE TENANTS ARE PROPERLY SITUATED
[05:28:14] AND EXISTING BUILDINGS ARE NOT DISPLACED SO CITY COULD HAVE ITS
[05:28:18] OWN, I GUESS, DEMOLITION RESTRICTION, IF YOU WILL, TO ADOPT OWN
[05:28:23] REGULATIONS TO BASICALLY PREVENT BUILDINGS THAT HAVE, I THINK,
[05:28:27] TENANTS THAT HAVE TO BE THERE FOR AT LEAST A YEAR OR LONGER. I
[05:28:31] CAN'T REMEMBER THE TIMEFRAME WE WOULD MAKE ADOPT ORDINANCE, SAY,
[05:28:35] IF BUILDING AND TENANTS IN IT, LANDLORD OR OWNER WOULDN'T BE ABLE
[05:28:40] TO DEMOLISH IT TO BUILD ANOTHER BUILDING TO BE COMPLIANT WITH
[05:28:45] EXISTING SB50. WE ARE DISPLACING TENANTS. THERE IS CONTROL OF
[05:28:50] CITY TO DO THAT LONG WAY SAYING THIS DIFFERENT 827 DIFFERENT
[05:28:54] MINDSET BUT WOULD OBVIOUSLY ALSO LOSE LOCAL CONTROL. I WANT TO
[05:28:59] BRING UP FOR DISCUSSION CITIES SENDING LETTERS OPPOSITION ALREADY
[05:29:06] -- MY RECOMMENDATION AT THIS STAGE WOULD BE TO ASK STAFF TO
[05:29:10] EVALUATE THIS BILL AND COME UP WITH THEIR OWN RECOMMENDATIONS AND
[05:29:15] THOUGHTS ABOUT NEXT STEPS AND ENGAGE WITH THE SENATORS AND STAFF
[05:29:20] IF THEY FEEL IT IS NEEDED TO COME BACK TO US. I THINK THIS BILL
[05:29:24] IS PROCEEDING QUICKLY. THE FACT SHEET I INCLUDED, IF YOU TAKE A
[05:29:29] LOOK AT THE LAST PAGE OF THE FACT SHEET, I WAS SURPRISED ABOUT
[05:29:33] HOW MANY SUPPORTERS OF THE BILL, INCLUDING LODGE OF LEGISLATIVE
[05:29:41] AND ELECTED OFFICIALS AND ORGANIZATIONS. THE BILL BASICALLY HAS
[05:29:45] A LOT OF TRACTION TO IT. I JUST DON'T WANT TO WAIT SIMILAR TO
[05:29:50] WHAT WE HAD TO DO WITH THE BILL REGARDING SIDEWALK VENDING A FEW
[05:29:55] WEEKS AGO HAVE A BILL GO THROUGH AND WE HAVE TO BE AFTER THE
Page 90 of 94
[05:29:59] FACT. THIS BILL WILL EFFECT ALL CITIES IN CALIFORNIA TO
[05:30:03] OBVIOUSLY SOME TO DIFFERENT DEGREES. IT WOULD PROBABLY BE BETTER
[05:30:08] FOR US TO ASK OUR STAFF TO EVALUATE IT AND LOOK AT IT AND KEEP US
[05:30:12] ENGAGED AND HAVE THAT COME BACK WITH A MORE THOROUGH AGENDA ITEM
[05:30:17] TO EVALUATE TO SUPPORT OPPOSE OR ENGAGE WITH SENATOR STAFF AND
[05:30:22] LITTLE MORE ACTIVE STATUS THAN WHAT WE HAVE DONE S O FAR. SO FAR
[05:30:26] FROM OUR STANDPOINT SACRAMENTO IN GENERAL -- DELEGATION ABOUT 50
[05:30:32] OFFICERS OR SO SPOKE AND SENATOR WIENER CAME TO US AND GAVE
[05:30:37] PRESENTATION ABOUT THE BOOR AND SAID HE WILL HAVE OPEN DOOR
[05:30:40] POLICY AND HAVE PEOPLE TALK TO HIM. WHEN I WAS BACK AGAIN LAST
[05:30:43] WEEK, I HAD A CHANCE TO TALK TO THEM AGAIN SINCE LISTENING TO
[05:30:48] HIM. WE HAVEN'T ENGAGED WITH HIM, HAVEN'T SENT LETTER TO HIM. I
[05:30:56] THINK IT IS PROBABLY SOMETHING WE SHOULD CONSIDER DOING AT THIS
[05:31:00] STAGE BEFORE IT GETS TOO LATE AND PASSED THE TIME HE WOULD ACCEPT
[05:31:06] AMENDMENTS OR CONSIDERATION FROM US.
[05:31:08] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT UPDATE.
[05:31:11] >> I WANT TO CLARIFY. SO YOU ARE -- YOU ARE JUST LOOKING
[05:31:14] TO GIVE STAFF DIRECTION TO LOOK INTO THIS FURTHER; RIGHT? IS
[05:31:18] THAT WHAT YOUR ACTION HERE IS CALLING FOR.
[05:31:21] >> YES. I THINK ONE OF THE THOUGHTS IS BASICALLY TO GIVE
[05:31:24] AN UPDATE TONIGHT WITH A RECOMMENDED YOU KNOW LETTER OF
[05:31:28] OPPOSITION. I THINK THAT IS MAYBE TOO PREMATURE. IF I THINK
[05:31:32] THAT WE HAVEN'T GIVEN STAFF THE OPPORTUNITY TO EVALUATE THE ISSUE
[05:31:36] AND TALK TO THE SENATOR.
[05:31:38] >> IT IS NOT A MOTION; RIGHT? JUST DIRECTION TO STAFF TO
[05:31:41] LOOK INTO THE BILLING AND COME BACK AND REPORT ON THE STATUS
[05:31:45] WHERE IT IS.
[05:31:46] >> YES. IT HAS WHERE I AM AS LONG AS OTHER MEMBERS OF THE
[05:31:49] COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO GIVE THAT DIRECTION, YES. THAT IS MY
[05:31:52] VIEWPOINT. CITY MANAGER WOULD WANT TO HEAR FROM MORE THAN
[05:31:56] ONE PERSON TO GET THE DIRECTION IF YOU ARE AMENABLE.
[05:31:58] >> I SUPPORT IT.
[05:32:00] >> WE SHOULD MAKE IT IN FORM OF MOTION.
[05:32:03] >> I DON'T THINK SO. THEY ARE LOOKING TO --
[05:32:05] >> COME BACK WITH A POTENTIAL LETTER.
[05:32:07] >> THIS IS AGENDA ITEM, WE WOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE A MOTION,
[05:32:11] BUT IT IS UP TO YOU.
[05:32:12] >> ALL RIGHT.
[05:32:13] >> I WOULD, MADAME MAYOR, BACK COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY'S
[05:32:17] INCLINATION TO HAVE US AS A CITY GET AHEAD OF THIS BECAUSE THE
[05:32:22] ONE BOARD MEETING OR EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING I SAT IN ON YOUR
[05:32:27] BEHALF, THERE WAS A LENGTHY DISCUSSION ABOUT SB50.
[05:32:31] IT IS -- IT IS THE PROBLEM WITH IT IS THE ATTEMPTS TO TAKE
[05:32:35] AWAY LOCAL CONTROL AND TREAT ALL MUNICIPALITIES SORT OF SIMILARLY
[05:32:40] ACROSS HOUSING SHORTAGE ISSUES WHEN THERE IS VAST DIFFERENCES
[05:32:46] ACROSS TYPES OF CHALLENGES THEY WOULD FACE IF THAT WERE TO COME
[05:32:52] TO PASS. THEY BROUGHT UP ALL SORTS OF INTERESTING FACTS,
Page 91 of 94
[05:32:55] ENGINEERS IN THE ROOM, ABOUT THE FUTURE TRENDS OF PEOPLE LIVING
[05:32:58] IN CALIFORNIA AND MIGRATING CLOSER TO THE COAST AND IN THE EVENT
[05:33:02] OF EVENTUAL CLIMATE CHANGES AND ALL KINDS OF INTERESTING THINGS.
[05:33:08] I WOULD JUST TO YOUR POINT, I THINK WE SHOULD GET OUR HEADS IN IT
[05:33:12] AND SEE IF THERE ARE POSITIONS AS A CITY THAT WE WOULD WANT TO
[05:33:19] TAKE A STAND FOR. IT IS A LITTLE BIT OF WILD WEST IN TERMS OF
[05:33:23] THEY WON'T STOP BRINGING THIS FORWARD. THE HOUSING SHORTAGE
[05:33:27] ISSUE IS SO SEVERE I THINK -- I DON'T REMEMBER. I HEARD, BUT
[05:33:30] SENATOR WIENER WON'T STOP. HE WILL KEEP BRINGING IT. HE IS VERY
[05:33:36] PASSIONATE ABOUT IT UNTIL WE GET SOMETHING PASSED IN THE STATE.
[05:33:39] >> I THINK, IF I MAY, MADAME MAYOR, SENATOR WIENER IS CHAIR
[05:33:44] OF COMMITTEE THAT OVERSEES THE BILL. THE ASSURANCE BILL WILL
[05:33:49] LEAVE THE COMMITTEE. HE IS CHAIRMAN. HE WILL MAKE SURE IT
[05:33:53] LEAVES COMMITTEE AND COMES TO FLOOR FOR INPUT. THE FLOOR FOR
[05:33:58] VOTE NOW IS PROBABLY RIGHT TIME TO DO IT.
[05:34:00] >> ALL RIGHT. I THINK THEN STAFF HEARD US THAT THEY WANT
[05:34:04] -- WE WANT YOU TO EVALUATE SB50. AND WE CAN HAVE A MOTION NOW?
[05:34:10] >> YES. MADAME MAYOR, I MOVE THAT WE EXTEND THE MEETING
[05:34:15] UNTIL 11:15
[05:34:16] >> DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
[05:34:18] >> SECOND.
[05:34:19] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[05:34:20] >> AYE.
[05:34:22] >> A SPECIAL TREAT FOR YOU GUYS AT THE END WHEN WE HAVE TO
[05:34:27] GO BACK INTO CLOSED SESSION, BUT IN ANY EVENT --
[05:34:31] >> MADAME MAYOR, MOTION ON GRANICUS WAS DIFFERENT ON THE
[05:34:39] MOTION. MOTION WAS TO EXTEND THE MEETING.
[05:34:40] >> CORRECT.
[05:34:41] >> NOT TO --
[05:34:42] >> OH, I DON'T -- I CAN'T SEE.
[05:34:45] >> NOT WITH STAFF REGARDING SB50.
[05:34:48] >> MIKE SAID HE HAD THE MOTION JUST DIRECTION.
[05:34:53] >> ALL RIGHT. MADAME CLERK, LOOK INTO THAT. THANK YOU FOR
[05:34:57] NOTICING. MADAME CLERK.
[05:34:59] >> BEFORE YOU TAKE IT TO MADAME CLERK.
[05:35:01] >> OH, YES.
[05:35:02] >> MADAME MAYOR, IF IT WERE A MOTION REGARDING SB50, I
[05:35:07] WOULDN'T SUPPORT IT WITH DUE RESPECT TO MY COLLEAGUES. I BELIEVE
[05:35:10] THIS IS AN APPROPRIATE THING FOR US TO UTILIZE LEAGUE OF CITIES
[05:35:14] FOR. THAT IS WHAT THEY DO, AND WE PAY A MEMBERSHIP FEE, AND WE
[05:35:18] ARE INVOLVED, SO THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR.
[05:35:21] >> OKAY. HOPEFULLY STAFF CAN WORK WITH THEM TO GIVE
[05:35:26] UPDATES TO LESSENS BURDEN AND LOAD. MADAME CLERK?
[05:35:32] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR. 7B IS UPDATES FROM CITY
[05:35:37] COUNCIL, AD HOC SUB-COMMITTEES, OUTSTANDING DELEGATES, AND
[05:35:43] ALTERNATES.
[05:35:44] >> ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE ANY SUB-COMMITTEE UPDATES? WE
Page 92 of 94
[05:35:49] MET AS A DOWNTOWN SUB-COMMITTEE. COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY, YOU
[05:35:57] RAISED TO PUSH THAT BUTTON.
[05:35:58] >> WE CONTINUE TO WORK TO LIGHTING APPROVAL OF THE HARDWARE
[05:36:04] AS WELL AS LOOKING AT CONCEPTS FOR SOME SEATING ALONG PIER
[05:36:10] AVENUE. THAT, I BELIEVE, IS THE BULK OF OUR LAST MEETING.
[05:36:13] >> AND --
[05:36:15] >> AND TARASH'S ISSUES AROUND LOT A. WE HAVE CHANGES
[05:36:22] COMING TO HOW WE MANAGE TRASH IN LOT A. WHAT WE ARE DOING IS NOT
[05:36:27] WORKING.
[05:36:30] >> YUP.
[05:36:31] >> AND COMING UP AT OUR NEXT MEETING IS PURCHASE AND
[05:36:34] INSTALLATION OF PIER AVENUE BUS STOP SHELTERS AND FURNITURE,
[05:36:40] WHICH IS PART OF WHAT WE WERE DISCUSSING AT THE LAST MEETING. IT
[05:36:45] WILL BE COMING IN FRONT OF US AND ALSO COMING TO OUR NEXT MEETING
[05:36:48] IS APPROVAL OF SUMMER CONCERT AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR 2019. STAFF
[05:36:54] IS WORKING DILIGENTLY ON THAT. WE WILL HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR
[05:36:58] US, AND IT LOOKS GREAT FOR OUR -- OUR NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. ANY
[05:37:04] OTHER SUB-COMMITTEE UPDATES? OUR NORTH SCHOOL SUB-COMMITTEE WILL
[05:37:09] BE MEETING ON MONDAY; RIGHT? SO WE WILL BEGIN THOSE DISCUSSIONS.
[05:37:16] >> NEXT WEEK ANYWAY.
[05:37:17] >> NEXT WEEK IMPLEMENTING THE MLU. ALL RIGHT.
[05:37:24] MADAME CLERK.
[05:37:27] >> NEXT IS OTHER MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL.
[05:37:31] >> MADAME MAYOR, I DO HAVE -- I DO HAVE ANOTHER -- I DO
[05:37:37] HAVE OTHER MATTERS I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS. CONSISTENT WITH THE
[05:37:43] PRESENTATION THAT WAS MADE EARLIER ABOUT 4/20, APRIL 20TH. WHAT
[05:37:51] I WOULD LIKE IS JUST FOR YOU TO CONSULT WITH THE POLICE CHIEF AND
[05:37:58] MAYBE REPORT BACK IN TERMS OF WHAT WE CAN DO IN TERMS OF ENHANCED
[05:38:02] ENFORCEMENT ON THAT DATE, YOU KNOW, CONCURRENT WITH OUR
[05:38:07] NEIGHBORING CITIES. HERE, I WILL GIVE YOU -- HERE IS LOTS OF
[05:38:12] GOOD MATERIAL FOR YOU TO READ. I'M HAPPY TO PASS THAT ALONG.
[05:38:17] >> THAT DATE BEING APRIL 20TH?
[05:38:20] >> YES.
[05:38:21] >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. MADAME CLERK?
[05:38:28] >> WAS THERE SUPPORT OR WAS THAT --
[05:38:34] >> WE HAD SOME HEAD NODS, YES.
[05:38:39] >> UM.
[05:38:40] >> OH, SORRY.
[05:38:41] >> SO NORMALLY, YEAH. WITH OTHER MATTERS, WE LIST WHO
[05:38:45] SUPPORTED THE ITEM.
[05:38:46] >> YOU HAVE MY HEAD NOD.
[05:38:48] >> SO STATE.
[05:38:49] >> I THINK WE HAVE AT LEAST COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY AND
[05:38:52] COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS AND MYSELF.
[05:38:55] >> ALL RIGHT.
[05:38:56] >> AND FANGARY.
[05:38:58] >> AND MAYOR PRO TEM. YEAH. YOU HAD UNANIMOUS HEAD NODS.
Page 93 of 94
[05:39:03] >> OKAY.
[05:39:04] >> ON TO TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA.
[05:39:11] >> YES.
[05:39:12] >> MADAME MAYOR, I DO HAVE ACTUALLY TWO ON THE PENDING DUE
[05:39:17] ITEMS ON THE HOLDING LIST, AS YOU WILL.
[05:39:21] >> UH-HUH.
[05:39:23] >> I WOULD LOVE TO SEE MOVE UP, AND, I THINK, APPROPRIATELY
[05:39:26] SO. THAT WOULD BE THE AMENDMENT TO THE TOBACCO RETAILERS LICENSE
[05:39:32] TO INCLUDE FLAVORED TOBACCO BAN ACROSS ALL RETAILERS AS I RECALL
[05:39:38] COUNCILMEMBER MASSEY FELT WE HAVE TO DO THAT AS A SEPARATE ITEM.
[05:39:42] I DON'T DISAGREE WITH THAT. I THINK THE TIME IS RIGHT, CERTAINLY
[05:39:47] GIVEN THE INFUSION OF INFORMATION THAT I NOW HAVE. I THINK THERE
[05:39:51] IS A SENSE OF URGENCY FOR THIS. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE US DO THAT.
[05:39:56] THE OTHER ONE IS THE PLASTICS ORDINANCE THAT IS SITTING THERE
[05:40:02] TOO. I ALSO BELIEVE IT COULD BE MOVED ON TO THE ACTIVE AGENDA AT
[05:40:07] SOME POINT SOONER RATHER THAN LATER. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT.
[05:40:13] >> ALL RIGHT.
[05:40:14] >> THAT IS ALL. THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR.
[05:40:18] >> TWO COMMENTS FOR DISCUSSION.
[05:40:20] >> YES.
[05:40:21] >> JEFF AND KEN WOULD BE ABLE TO TALK MORE ABOUT THIS THAN
[05:40:25] I WOULD. MY RECOLLECTION WAS THAT ANY ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT THE
[05:40:31] SALE OF FLAVORED TOBACCO PRODUCTS IN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WOULD
[05:40:37] BENEFIT FROM OUTREACH TO EFFECTED BUSINESSES PRIOR TO BRINGING
[05:40:41] THAT FORWARD.
[05:40:42] DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE THE BANDWIDTH TO DO THAT IN THE
[05:40:47] NEAR FUTURE?
[05:40:48] >> THAT IS OUR PLAN.
[05:40:50] >> TWO OUTLETS.
[05:40:51] >> TWO BUSINESSES TO OUTREACH TO. THEY WOULD BE AWARE OF
[05:40:56] CONSIDERING.
[05:40:57] >> TWO ON PCH, ONE DOWN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TOWN,
[05:41:02] BUT --
[05:41:03] >> I'M AWARE OF ONLY TWO FROM PRIOR RESEARCH WE DID. WE
[05:41:06] WILL DEFINITELY CHECK CLOSE TO.
[05:41:08] >> CLOSE TO EACH OTHER ON PCH; RIGHT? IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN.
[05:41:14] >> RIGHT.
[05:41:15] >> AND WITH RESPECT TO PLASTICS ORDINANCE THAT IS URGENT AS
[05:41:18] FAR AS I'M CONCERNED. I DO THINK IT REQUIRES A LOT OF SORT OF
[05:41:22] INVOLVEMENT, YOU AND I, PERHAPS IN TERMS OF CRAFTING THE AGENDA.
[05:41:26] AS YOU KNOW, I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO WORK ON POTENTIALLY A PANEL
[05:41:30] FOR OUR EARTH DAY FESTIVAL ON THE FUTURE OF SINGLE USE PLASTICS
[05:41:35] AND WOULD INCLUDE SOMEBODY FROM SURF RIDERS AND SOMEBODY FROM
[05:41:41] GRADES OF GREEN AND SENATOR ALLAN BILL IN LEGISLATURE NOW AND
[05:41:47] MAYOR PALATONO -- HE IS A BIG ADVOCATE FOR DOING STUFF ABOUT
[05:41:56] SINGLE USE PLASTICS. SO I AM HOPEFUL THAT, THAT, WE CAN PULL IT
[05:42:03] TOGETHER. IF SO, WE MIGHT HAVE IDEAS COMING OUT OF THAT FOR --
Page 94 of 94
[05:42:07] >> I DON'T THINK WE HAVE TO FORM A TASK FORCE OR A WORKING
[05:42:11] GROUP I THINK YOU AND I CAN WORK TOGETHER. I'M HAPPY TO DO
[05:42:14] WHATEVER I CAN TO ASSIST YOU ON THIS.
[05:42:16] >> RIGHT. I THINK WE MIGHT WANT AGENDA ITEM TO TRAIL ON
[05:42:22] THAT, WHATEVER WE GET IN THAT DISCUSSION AND GIVE INPUT TO STAFF
[05:42:25] TO COME FORWARD WITH OPTIONS.
[05:42:27] >> SOUNDS GOOD.
[05:42:28] >> THANK YOU, MADAME MAYOR AND THANKS JEFF.
[05:42:32] >> ALL RIGHT. OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? NO. ALL RIGHT.
[05:42:36] I THINK THAT WE HAVE REACHED THE END OF OUR MEETING.
[05:42:42] AND WE ARE ADJOURNING BACK TO OUR CLOSED SESSION, WHICH WILL
[05:42:49] BE IN THE SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM TO CONTINUE DISCUSSION ON
[05:42:54] INITIATION OF LITIGATION.
[05:42:57] THE NEXT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING IS TUESDAY, APRIL 9TH
[05:43:02] WITH CLOSED SESSION AT 6:00 P.M. FOLLOWED BY THE REGULAR MEETING
[05:43:07] AT 7:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. TONIGHT, WE ADJOURN TONIGHT'S
[05:43:14] MEETING IN MEMORY OF RESIDENT CHRIS FIX, WHO UNEXPECTEDLY AND
[05:43:20] TRAGICALLY PASSED AWAY FRIDAY, MARCH 22ND. WHETHER ON THE HOCKEY
[05:43:25] ICE, LACROSSE FIELD, OR BEACH, CHRIS FIX WAS AN AMAZING FIXTURE
[05:43:30] NOT ONLY IN HIS FAMILY'S LIFE BUT IN SO MANY PEOPLE'S LIVES IN
[05:43:34] THE SOUTH BAY AND IN THIS COMMUNITY AND BEYOND. CHRIS WILL BE
[05:43:38] GREATLY MISSED. HE IS SURVIVED BY HIS WIFE GENERALLY AND THEIR
[05:43:42] YOUNG SONS NATHAN, TABIN, AND GAVIN. A MEMORIAL SERVICE WILL BE
[05:43:48] HELD FRIDAY, APRIL 5TH, AT 10 A.M. AT AMERICAN MARTYRS CHURCH,
[05:43:55] 624. A MANHATTAN BEACH SCHOLARSHIP FUND IS BEING SET UP FOR
[05:44:03] CHILDREN, AND DETAILS WILL BE AVAILABLE SOON. YOU MAY CONTACT
[05:44:07] CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE FOR MORE INFORMATION.
Public Comment and Meeting Decorum Notes
Civility and respect will be offered to everyone in the room.
• All demonstrations, including cheering, yelling, whistling, or handclapping which disrupts, disturbs
or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the Council meeting are not allowed.
• We ask that you respect the rights of others and allow everyone to express their opinion without
noise or disturbance and take side conversations out to the courtyard.
• Please keep your comments focused on the issue being presented and avoid personal attacks
toward Council, staff, or others in the audience.
If you would like to speak during public comment.
• Please fill out a speaker card
• Each speaker will have a maximum of three minutes to speak.
• Transferring your time to other speakers is not allowed.
• When it’s your turn to speak, please begin by stating your name.
• Public comment is not a two-way dialogue between speakers, Council, and staff. Council will take
notes based on public comments and will address those questions to staff once ALL public
comment has been taken.
Failure to adhere to these procedures will result in a request for you to leave the Council Chambers.
Public Comment and Meeting Decorum Notes
Civility and respect will be offered to everyone in the room.
• All demonstrations, including cheering, yelling, whistling, or handclapping which disrupts, disturbs
or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the Council meeting are not allowed.
• We ask that you respect the rights of others and allow everyone to express their opinion without
noise or disturbance and take side conversations out to the courtyard.
• Please keep your comments focused on the issue being presented and avoid personal attacks
toward Council, staff, or others in the audience.
If you would like to speak during public comment.
• Please fill out a speaker card
• Each speaker will have a maximum of three minutes to speak.
• Transferring your time to other speakers is not allowed.
• When it’s your turn to speak, please begin by stating your name.
• Public comment is not a two-way dialogue between speakers, Council, and staff. Council will take
notes based on public comments and will address those questions to staff once ALL public
comment has been taken.
Failure to adhere to these procedures will result in a request for you to leave the Council Chambers.
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
5:30 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION
(LOCATION: Meetings convene in the Council Chambers and move to the Second Floor Conference
Room after Public Comment)
CALL TO ORDER IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS I call to order the March 26th Special Meeting of the City Council.
ROLL CALL Roll call please.
PUBLIC COMMENT Please come forward if you have comments on the closed session agenda.
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION IN SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
[After any comments]
We will now close public comment and recess to the 2nd floor conference room.
1. 19-0193 MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on March 12, 2019.
2. 19-0194 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Government Code Section 54957.6
City Negotiator: City Manager
Employee
Organizations: Hermosa Beach Police Officers’ Association
Teamsters Union, Local 911
Professional and Administrative Employee Group
Hermosa Beach Management Association
Unrepresented Employees
3. 19-0195 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Initiation of Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session
will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation.
Number of Potential Cases: 1
4. 19-0196 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Workers Comp Litigation
The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open
session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation.
Existing Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
a) Name of Case: Robert Higgins v. City of Hermosa Beach
WCAB Number: ADJ11093995
b) Name of Case: Todd Lewitt v. City of Hermosa Beach
WCAB Number: ADJ9858468, ADJ11019071, ADJ10177518
c) Name of Case: Rachel Muzatko v. City of Hermosa Beach
WCAB Number: ADJ10866914, ADJ10822138
d) Name of Case: Pamela Sargent v. City of Hermosa Beach
WCAB Number: ADJ11290398
ADJOURNMENT OF CLOSED SESSION
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
7:00 P.M. - REGULAR AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER I call to order the March 26th Regular Meeting of the City Council.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Will _____________ please lead us in the pledge of allegiance?
ROLL CALL Roll call please.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT Mr. City Attorney, will you deliver the closed session report?
ANNOUNCEMENTS Do any of my colleagues have announcements?
Last Reminder about the Second Annual Community Wide Garage Sale:
The City of Hermosa Beach will host its second annual community wide garage
sale this Saturday, March 30, 2019 from 7 AM to 12 PM with dozens of concurrent
garage sales throughout Hermosa Beach!
A map of the garage sale locations will be posted on the city website at
www.hermosabch.org/communitygaragesale
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS
a) 19-0198 RECOGNIZING EARTH HOUR ON MARCH 30, 2019 FROM
8:30 P.M. - 9:30 P.M. AND EARTH DAY ON APRIL 22, 2019
• City Clerk reads title
• Mayor Armato reads Proclamation from Dais
b) 19-0199 PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL AS
“DONATE LIFE MONTH”
• City Clerk reads title
• Invite Tammy Rusznak and Holly Miyagawa to podium
• Mayor presents Proclamation to Tammy and Holly
• Photo Opportunity
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments,
the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter
not listed on the posted agenda as a business item.
I’d like to take a moment to remind everyone about Public Comment and Meeting
Decorum:
Civility and respect will be offered to everyone in the room.
• All demonstrations, including cheering, yelling, whistling, or handclapping which
disrupts, disturbs or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the Council
meeting are not allowed.
• We ask that you respect the rights of others and allow everyone to express their
opinion without noise or disturbance and take side conversations out to the
courtyard.
• Please keep your comments focused on the issue being presented and avoid
personal attacks toward Council, staff, or others in the audience.
If you would like to speak during public comment.
• Please fill out a speaker card
• Each speaker will have a maximum of three minutes to speak.
• Transferring your time to other speakers is not allowed.
• When it’s your turn to speak, please begin by stating your name.
• Public comment is not a two-way dialogue between speakers, Council, and staff.
Council will take notes based on public comments and will address those
questions to staff once ALL public comment has been taken.
Failure to adhere to these procedures will result in a request for you to leave the
Council Chambers.
1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: This is the time for members of
the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's
jurisdiction not on this agenda, on items on this agenda as to which public
comment will not be taken (Miscellaneous Items and Reports – City Council and
Other Matters), or to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar.
Public comments on the agenda items called Miscellaneous Reports and Other
Matters will only be heard at this time. Comments on public hearing items are
heard only during the public hearing. Members of the audience may also speak:
1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar;
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
2) during Public Hearings; and,
3) during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. Comments from the
public are limited to three minutes per speaker. The City Council acknowledges
receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters
raised in written communications. The Council may take action to schedule issues
raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda. Citizens with comments
regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those
comments to the City Manager.
a) 19-0203 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the written communication from
Howard Longacre.
Attachments: Letter from Howard Longacre regarding cell tower and H2O Hotel Project
2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted
upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council.
There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member
removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered
under Agenda Item 4, with public comment permitted at that time.
a) REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
19-0183 (Deputy City Clerk Linda Abbott)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following minutes:
1. Adjourned Regular meeting of March 9, 2019
2. Regular meeting of March 12, 2019
Attachments: 1. 030919 draft min.docx 2. 031219 draft min.docx
b) REPORT CHECK REGISTERS
19-0168 (Finance Director Viki Copeland)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the following check registers.
Attachments: 1. 02-26-19 2. 02-28-29 3. 03-07-19
c) REPORT REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT,
19-0188 AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR FEBRUARY 2019
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the February 2019 Financial
Reports.
Attachments: 1. Feb 2019 Revenue Report 2. Feb 2019 Expenditure Report 3. CIP Report by Project- Feb 2019
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
d) REPORT CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT
19-0189 (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki)
Recommendation:City Treasurer recommends that the City Council receive and file the February 2019
City Treasurer's Report and Cash Balance Report.
Attachments: 1. February 2019 Treasurer's Report 2. February 2019 Cash Balance Report
e) REPORT CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS
19-0190 (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki)
Recommendation:City Treasurer recommends that the City Council approve cancellation of certain
checks.
f) REPORT PROJECT STATUS REPORT AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 2019
19-0185 (Acting Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Project Status Report as of
February 28, 2019.
Attachments: 1. CIP Status Sheet - March 2019.pdf 2. 2018-19 Capital Improvement Program
g) REPORT ACTION SHEET OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
19-0208 MARCH 19, 2019
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the action sheet of the Planning
Commission meeting of March19, 2019.
Attachments: Planning Commission Action Sheet 3-19-19
h) REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
19-0207 (Community Development Director Ken Robertson)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the April 16, 2019 Planning
Commission tentative future agenda items.
Attachments: Planning Commission Tentative Agenda for 4-16-19.pdf
i) REPORT CLARIFICATIONS TO PROCESS AND STANDARDS
19-0186 FOR REVIEW OF ON-SALE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
(Community Development Director Ken Robertson)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council affirm the attached clarifications to the
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) review process.
Attachments: Proposed amendment with PC additions
j) REPORT ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION
19-0206 MEETING OF JANUARY 16, 2019
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Public
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
Works Commission meeting of January 16, 2019.
Attachments: PWC action minutes 1-16-19
k) REPORT AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND
19-0137 INSPECTION SERVICES CONTRACT TO TRANSTECH
ENGINEERS, INC. FOR CIP 17-687 AND CIP 18-691,
ADA IMPROVEMENTS ON PROSPECT AVENUE
(Acting Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Award the Professional Service Agreement for Construction Management and
Inspection Services for CIP 17-687 and CIP 18-691 for ADA Improvements on Prospect
Avenue, in the amount of $40,460;
2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement and the City Clerk to attest subject to
approval by the City Attorney; and
3. Authorize 25% project contingency for a total contract budget of $50,575.00.
Attachments: 1. RFP 2. Draft PSA.pdf 3. Proposal and Fee
l) REPORT AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR CIP 17-687
19-0184 AND CIP 18-691, ADA IMPROVEMENTS ON PROSPECT AVENUE
(Acting Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Award a construction contract for CIP17-687 and CIP 18-691 for ADA Improvements
on
Prospect Avenue in the amount of $141,900.00;
2. Adopt the attached resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Hermosa Beach Approving the Construction of CIP 17-687 and CIP 18-691 ADA
Improvements on Prospect Avenue;
3. Authorize the Mayor to execute the construction contract and the City Clerk to attest,
subject to approval by the City Attorney;
4. Authorize the Acting Director of Public Works to establish a 25% project contingency
for a total construction budget of $177,375; and
5. Authorize the Acting Director of Public Works to file a Notice of Completion following
final completion of the project.
Attachments: 1. Bid Opening 2. Draft Agreement 3. Draft Resolution
m) REPORT BROWN ACT COMPLAINT FILED BY ANTHONY HIGGINS
19-0197 (City Attorney Mike Jenkins)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Receive and file this report; and
2. Direct the City Attorney to send a letter (Attachment 2) pursuant to Government Code
�54960.1 (c)(2) communicating the City Council's determination that no Brown Act
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
violation occurred and therefore that the City Council will not cure or correct the
challenged actions.
Attachments: 1. 02-25-19 Higgins Brown Act Cure and orrect Demand Letter-c2.pdf 2. Proposed Response to Mr. Higgins' letter.pdf
n) REPORT RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT CLAIM
19-0180 (Human Resources Manager Vanessa Godinez)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council reject the following claim and refer it to the
City's Liability Claims Administrator.
Claimant: Stephen Allan Diamond
Date of Loss: August 22, 2018
Date Claim Filed: December 31, 2018
Date Revised Claim Filed: January 28, 2019
Allegation: Claimant alleges he stepped into a hole in the walkway near a parking meter
at Hermosa Ave. and 26th Street which resulted in physical injuries to his ankle.
Attachments: Stephen Allan Diamond_claim
o) REPORT A RESOLUTION OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY
19-0192 COUNCIL ELECTING TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Find that the following proposed action is exempt from review pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines
Section 15061(b)(3);
2. Adopt the following Resolution waiving further reading: a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, electing to be exempt from the
Congestion Management Program.
Attachments: 1. Government_Code_Section_65088.3-Opt_Out_Provision.pdf 2. Resolution.docx 3. Metro Board Report with Attachments – June 20 2018.pdf 4. Metro CMP Opt-Out FAQ Sheet.pdf
p) REPORT NORTH SCHOOL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
19-0204 SUBCOMMITTEE AND MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FULFILLMENT OVERSIGHT ROLE
(City Manager Suja Lowenthal)
Recommendation:The North School Reconstruction Project Subcommittee (Subcommittee) members
recommend that the City Council authorize the Subcommittee to continue to serve as
the Council's representatives on the joint City and Hermosa Beach City School District
collaborative charged with overseeing the fulfillment of the North School Reconstruction
Project Memorandum of Understanding executed on February 27, 2019.
Attachments: 1. Link to North Elementary School Project Memorandum of
Understanding - 02-27-19
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
2. Link to City Council 02-26-19 Meeting - Item 6b
q) REPORT APPROVAL OF LETTER OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 377
19-0187 (GARCIA): MICROENTERPRISE HOME KITCHEN OPERATIONS
(Assistant to the City Manager Nico De Anda-Scaia)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign a letter
of opposition on behalf of the City regarding Assembly Bill 377 (AB 377) related to
permitting and regulation of microenterprise home kitchen operations, to be shared with
key legislators and local stakeholders.
Attachments: 1. Draft Letter of Opposition to AB 377 2. AB 377 - Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations
3. AB 626 - California Retail Food Code: Microenterprise Home Kitchen
Operations
3. CONSENT ORDINANCES
NONE
4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M.
NONE
6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS
a) REPORT GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
19-0191 (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Proceed with a project at the existing Greenbelt location; or
2. Proceed with a project at an alternative location within the City's jurisdiction that
would capture and treat the equivalent volume of stormwater; or
3. Initiate a dissolution or an amendment of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
to negotiate a suitable substitute or revised MOU and project with the City's partners,
relinquish the Grant and forfeit the grant funding.
Attachments: 1. D1712669_Executed Agreement.pdf 2. Approved MOU_Cost Sharing (Signed).pdf 3. Link to Project Page and Presentations 4. 2018-06-19-CommunityMeeting_TtSlides (061818).pptx 5. EH-SiteEvaluation-Option2-TT.pdf 6. EH-SiteEvaluation-SouthPark.pdf 7. EH-SiteEvaluation-Option3-TT.pdf 8. Alternative Sites_Hermosa Beach (100918).pdf
City Council Special Meeting Agenda March 26, 2019
Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019
9. Memo_HB and RB collaboration (3).pdf
10. RE Inquiry on Potential Use of SCE RW - CatalinaHerondoN
Francisca - City of Redondo Beach.msg
11. SD2-AlondraPark.pdf
7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS - CITY
COUNCIL
a) 19-0200 COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY PROVIDES UPDATE
ON MEETING WITH SENATOR SCOTT WIENER’S
LEGISLATIVE AIDE TO DISCUSS SENATE BILL 50
Attachments: 1. SB 50 Fact Sheet.pdf 2. SBCCOG Opposition Letter 2-20-19.pdf 3. Link to Bill Text and Information
b) 19-0201 UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES
AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES
8. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items. No discussion or
debate of these requests shall be undertaken; the sole action is whether to schedule the
item for consideration on a future agenda. No public comment will be taken.
Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items.
a) 19-0202 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the tentative future agenda
items.
Attachments: Tentative Future Agenda.pdf
ADJOURNMENT This meeting is adjourned. The next regular City Council meeting is Tuesday, April 9 with Closed Session at 6pm, followed by the regular meeting at 7pm. We also adjourn tonight’s meeting in memory of Chris Fix (refer to certificate)
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0191
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1.Proceed with a project at the existing Greenbelt location; or
2.Proceed with a project at an alternative location within the City’s jurisdiction that would capture
and treat the equivalent volume of stormwater; or
3.Initiate a dissolution or an amendment of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to
negotiate a suitable substitute or revised MOU and project with the City’s partners, relinquish
the Grant and forfeit the grant funding.
Executive Summary:
The Hermosa Greenbelt Infiltration Project (Project)is the highest priority project in the Beach Cities
Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP)that would achieve the greatest reduction in
bacterial levels,at the Herondo Drain Outfall in Hermosa Beach.The awarded Proposition 1
Stormwater Implementation Grant of $3,099,400 represents approximately one half of the estimated
total project cost.In response to community concerns regarding the proximity of the Project to
residential dwelling units and the potential construction and operational impacts,progress was
delayed on the Project as City Council reviewed alternative project sites and initiated negotiations
with Redondo Beach to site the project in Redondo Beach.This delay resulted in the State Water
Resources Control Board (State Board)issuing a breach of agreement notice to the City.The City is
required to notify the State Board by April 1,2019 as to whether it will implement a project at a
location within the City’s jurisdiction or forfeit the grant funding and initiate a dissolution of the
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)for cost-sharing with the Beach Cities Watershed
Management Group (Beach Cities WMG).
Background:
The cities of Hermosa Beach,Torrance,Redondo Beach,Manhattan Beach and the Los Angeles
County Flood Control District formed the Beach Cities WMG in 2013 to develop an EWMP to comply
with the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board)2012 Municipal
Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS4 Permit),which the Regional Board issued under the
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 12
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0191
Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS4 Permit),which the Regional Board issued under the
Clean Water Act,and comply with Santa Monica Bay Beaches Bacteria (SMBBB)Total Maximum
Daily Load (TMDL) and Santa Monica Bay Toxics TMDL, which are requirements of the MS4 Permit.
The EWMP identifies strategies and best management practices that,when implemented individually
by jurisdictions,or collectively at a watershed scale,would satisfy the requirements of the MS4
Permit.Although the EWMP is a long-term plan,it is a document that the Regional Board can enforce
should permittees covered under the EWMP fail to meet the project milestones contained therein.
The City is subject to coming into compliance over time with numeric limits established by TMDLs
discussed above.The most notable TMDL for the City is the Santa Monica Bay Beaches Bacteria
TMDL that contains dry weather limits that became effective in 2006 and 2009,and wet weather
numeric limits that must be complied with by July 15,2021.Exceedances of numeric limits without an
“alternative compliance option”can,in some cases,expose a city to Regional Board enforcement
actions or third party citizen suits,and the liability therefrom.For example,the City of Malibu settled a
lawsuit with the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)and LA Waterkeeper,agreeing before
trial to a complex agreement that included payment of $750,000 in attorney’s fees,upgrades to storm
water facilities, regular compliance reporting and other cumbersome obligations.
On November 26,2013,City Council approved the initial MOU with the Beach Cities WMG for Phase
I of the EWMP and the Regional Board received the final EWMP on February 9,2016.The Executive
Officer of the Regional Board approved the EWMP via a letter dated April 18,2016 and directed the
Beach Cities WMG to commence implementing the EWMP immediately.The members of the Beach
Cities WMG are deemed to be in compliance with the MS4 so long as it diligently implements all
EWMP requirements,both in its jurisdiction and in conjunction with other cities with which it has
mutual projects.
Following the Regional Board’s approval of the EWMP in 2016,the City,in partnership with the
Beach Cities WMG,submitted a successful application to the State Board for funding the design and
construction of the Greenbelt Infiltration Project that is the highest priority project in the EWMP
because it would achieve the greatest reduction in bacterial levels,at the Herondo Drain Outfall.
Figure 1 shows priority catchments for placement of regional projects in the Herondo Storm Drain
tributary area (as shown in red).The City of Torrance completed the Torrance Basins Enhancement
regional projects including the Henrietta,Amie,and Entradero Basins to treat a tributary area of 1407
acres south of 190th Street.
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 2 of 12
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0191
Figure 1. Land use and Priority Project areas in the Herondo Drain Watershed.
The purpose of the Greenbelt Infiltration Project is to divert the first 15 minutes of storm water in wet
weather conditions,and treat that storm water through multiple stages of treatment culminating in
infiltration,removing 100%of the pollutant load of the diverted stormwater and eliminating the
discharge of those pollutants to Santa Monica Bay.The Proposition 1 Stormwater Implementation
Grant (Prop 1 Grant)amount of $3,099,400 represents approximately one half of the estimated
Project cost.The balance of the Project cost must be provided as local matching funds by the
members of the Beach Cities WMG.
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 3 of 12
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0191
The City executed an agreement with the State Board (Attachment 1)to accept the Prop 1 Grant
and serve as the lead agency for the design and construction of the Project (the Funding Agreement).
Through an approved MOU dated September 26,2017(Attachment 2),the other members of the
Beach Cities WMG contribute a proportionate share of the local matching funds.The total Project
budget is $7,336,180 and the cost sharing formula is based on each jurisdiction’s contributing
tributary area to the project after subtracting the treatment capacity of the City of Torrance Basin
Enhancement Project.
The City’s share of design costs is $115,550.50 (13.6%)and the current estimate for the City of
Hermosa Beach share of construction costs is $460,651.59,for a total project budget of $576,202.09.
Redondo Beach,Torrance,and Manhattan Beach would contribute 50.8%,33.1%and 2.5%of the
remaining design and construction costs, respectively.
At their September 12,2017 meeting,City Council awarded a professional services agreement to
Tetra Tech,Inc.for the design of the Project.A competitive process that included representatives
from each of the Beach Cities WMG selected Tetra Tech as the most qualified team based on
qualifications and references,experience with similar projects,including projects within Regional
Board’s jurisdiction, and the cost proposal.
Community Engagement
In accordance with the scope of work and schedule,Tetra Tech commenced site surveys at the
Hermosa Beach Greenbelt and developed preliminary designs that were presented at community
workshops held on March 29,2018 and May 10,2018.City Council convened a special study
session on June 19,2018 to discuss the project background,site selection process and California
Environmental Quality Act requirements for the proposed project.Since this was a study session,City
Council took no formal actions at this meeting and received public comment following the
presentations. Presentations are available on the project page:
<http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=938> (Attachment 3).
Based on community concerns regarding the proximity of the Project to residences and the potential
construction and operational impacts,staff provided an analysis of alternative project sites located in
Hermosa Beach.Approximately 720 residential units are within 500ft of the existing project site,
primarily in the large apartment complexes Playa Pacifica and The Gallery,and the Moorings and
Beachside condominiums.Approximately 17 dwelling units in the Moorings Condominiums directly
overlook the project site.Moreover,in a letter dated July 12,the Moorings Homeowners Association
group presented additional sites located in Redondo Beach for consideration.
At the October 9,2018 City Council meeting,City Council considered alternative locations for the
Project within the City’s jurisdiction to meet the water quality requirements at the Herondo Drain
Outfall.The alternative locations discussed at the June 19,2018 Special Study Session (Attachment
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 4 of 12
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0191
Outfall.The alternative locations discussed at the June 19,2018 Special Study Session (Attachment
4) and summarized below include:
1.Greenbelt North of 2nd Street (Attachment 5)
2.Turf Field at South Park, 425 Valley Drive (Attachment 6)
3.Herondo Street at Valley Drive (Attachment 7)
Potential benefits of selecting an alternative location in Hermosa Beach include:1)the ability to retain
the Prop 1 Grant funding;2)greater likelihood to be approved by the Regional Board as a timely
amendment to the EWMP;and 3)ability to comply with the 2021 operative project completion
schedule in the EWMP.
The Herondo Street at Valley Drive location presented at the October 9,2018 Council Meeting
(Attachment 8),was determined to be predominantly located in Redondo Beach.Other potential
Redondo Beach sites were presented in the staff report,however,they were not included in the site
analysis since these sites are not within the City’s jurisdiction and cannot be evaluated without the
permission of Redondo Beach.On October 16,2018 staff met with Redondo Beach staff to discuss
the feasibility of these sites and other parcels within Redondo Beach and in proximity to the Herondo
storm drain.Staff summarized the outcomes of this discussion in a Memorandum dated October 24,
2018 (Attachment 9).The responses from SCE and AES denying the City’s request to explore their
properties as potential sites are included as attachments to the October 9,2018 staff report.
Following the October 16 meeting,Redondo Beach staff followed up with SCE with an additional
request for permission to use the site which was also declined (Attachment 10).
Greenbelt North of 2nd Street
The site is located underneath the Greenbelt,directly north of 2nd Street and extending for
approximately 1,200 feet through to 6th Street (Attachment 5).There are approximately 175
residential dwelling units within 500 feet of the project site that could be impacted by construction,
and future operation and maintenance activities.A number of condominiums on 2nd Street directly
overlook the project site.The location has sufficient capacity to capture the required volume of
stormwater and would be confined to the width of the wood-chip walking path on the Greenbelt to
limit tree removal.The resulting design is narrow and irregularly shaped and would likely require
shoring (i.e.pile-driving)that would increase the construction costs and schedule compared to the
existing location.
Construction would be enclosed behind construction fencing for the duration of construction and
potential impacts could include restricted access to this portion of the Greenbelt and the removal of
trees and shrubs that would be replanted upon completion of construction activities.Construction
cost estimates are approximately $3.8M higher compared to the existing Greenbelt location.
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 5 of 12
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0191
South Park Turf Field, 425 Valley Drive
South Park is located 1000 feet north of the existing site at 425 Valley Drive.Park amenities include
restroom facilities,a turf field and playground,picnic tables,and classrooms.Renovations to the
northern perimeter of the park were completed in 2016 and include the installation of a universally
accessible playground and a community garden.There are approximately 200 residential dwelling
units within 500 feet of the project site that could be potentially impacted by construction activities.
Figure 2. Rendering for proposed South Park project area.
The alternative project is located beneath a portion of the turf field within the existing pathway (Figure
2).The area is sufficient in size to design a system to meet the required water quality priorities for the
Permit and Grant Agreement.Infiltration projects are common beneath turf fields and public parks
because they are large,regularly shaped,undeveloped publicly-owned parcels.These factors reduce
the design and construction cost and timeline,and provide an opportunity to enhance park amenities
such as picnic shelters,irrigation and landscaping.Following construction,the park could be
enhanced to include many unfinished elements of the South Park Master Plan.
In addition to the examples of similar projects presented in the October 9,2018 staff report,Beach
Cities WMG partners Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach are also currently partnering with Los
Angeles County on the Alondra Park Multi-Benefit Stormwater Capture Project located in Lawndale.
This project would divert 70 Acre-Feet urban and stormwater runoff from surrounding areas including
unincorporated communities and the cities of El Segundo,Hawthorne,Lawndale,Manhattan Beach,
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 6 of 12
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0191
unincorporated communities and the cities of El Segundo,Hawthorne,Lawndale,Manhattan Beach,
and Redondo Beach into an underground storage and water treatment system beneath the turf fields
at Alondra Park (Attachment 11).
Construction at South Park is estimated to take 12 months and the uniformly shaped system is
relatively simple to excavate compared to the other site alternatives.Excavation at this site would not
require shoring (i.e.pile-driving),thereby reducing the noise and vibrations during construction.
Construction would be enclosed behind construction fencing and the field would be closed for the
duration of the construction.All other park amenities,including the playground and community
garden,would operate at full capacity during construction.Depending on the staging location and
other construction activities,potential impacts could include restricted access to a portion of the
sidewalk and parking lot,and the relocation of furniture,lighting and vegetation.Following
construction,the park could be enhanced to include many unfinished elements of the South Park
Master Plan.
The diversion pipeline from Herondo Drain would be through a conveyance pipe under the Greenbelt.
The construction of the diversion pipeline would most likely consist of conventional trenching with
temporary hydraulic shoring devices.Pile-driving is not expected for pipeline installation.The
actuated valve,pretreatment device and possibly the pump station would be located below the
Greenbelt.This is the lowest-cost alternative to the current location (+/-~$865,000)based on
construction cost estimates using Caltrans historical cost data,recent bid results,and RSMeans cost
data.
At the October 9,2018 City Council meeting,residents expressed similar concerns to the existing
Greenbelt location regarding the construction schedule,noise,odor,toxic buildup,liquefaction,vector
control,and adjacent structure vulnerability.Staff and consultants discussed many of these concerns
at the June 19, 2018 and October 9, 2018 meetings and they are summarized here:
·Construction Schedule:Construction at South Park is estimated to take 12 months due to the
uniformly shaped system and limited vegetation removal and site preparation compared to the
other site alternatives.Park amenities,including the playground and community garden,would
operate at full capacity during construction.Potential impacts could include noise during
construction hours,and restricted access to a portion of the sidewalk and parking lot,and the
relocation of furniture, lighting and vegetation.
·Noise:Excavation at this site would not require shoring (i.e.pile-driving),thereby reducing the
noise and vibrations during construction.Construction would be enclosed behind construction
fencing and the field would be closed for the duration of the construction.The actuated valve,
pretreatment device and possibly the pump station would be located below the Greenbelt and
would unlikely at ground surface during operation.
·Odor:Odors occur when standing water is retained in the system for extended periods of time.
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 7 of 12
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0191
·Odor:Odors occur when standing water is retained in the system for extended periods of time.
The system is designed to retain standing water for 48 to 72 hours and is dry for the remainder
of the time.The pretreatment device and forebay would extend the life of the system by
reducing solids and sediment entering the infiltration gallery,which reduce infiltration rates.
The Project Operation and Maintenance Manual would specify the frequency and types of
maintenance activities to ensure the system does not become clogged with fine sediment,
organic matter (leaf litter),or other materials that prevent percolation.Odors have not caused
concern for the Pier Avenue Improvement project in operation for nearly ten years that
includes an infiltration system to retain storm water runoff.Maintenance activities for this
project include annual inspections of catch basins and the manual removal of sediments via a
vacuum truck.
·Toxic Buildup:The MS4 permit identifies several pollutants of concern in stormwater,including
bacteria,zinc,copper,DDT and others.The majority of these pollutants adhere to solids and
sediments that are removed in the pretreatment device and forebay,and maintenance
activities are focused in a concentrated area.The Project Operation and Maintenance Manual
and the frequency of storms would determine the frequency of cleaning.The Project would
infiltrate a similar quality of stormwater as the Pier Avenue Improvement project,and toxic
buildup has not been a cause for concern.
·Liquefaction:Additional testing is recommended for the completion of the geotechnical
investigation at South Park to determine susceptibility to liquefaction.At the June 19 study
session,consultants discussed the liquefaction potential of soils at the existing Greenbelt
location.Materials above the groundwater table are not considered susceptible to
liquefaction,however,soils found below 10 feet are susceptible to liquefaction and measures
were incorporated into the design plans to attenuate potential impacts.
·Vector Control:The Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District would review design
documents and the Project Operation and Maintenance Manual,and recommend Best
Management Practices,if necessary,to reduce the potential mosquito breeding.The system is
designed to retain standing water for short periods of time-usually 48 to 72 hours-which is
much shorter than the time needed for mosquitoes to develop from larvae to adults.When
designed to this standard and properly maintained,water is infiltrated into the ground quickly
enough to limit the occurrence of mosquitos.
·Adjacent Structure Vulnerability:Excavation at this site would not require shoring (i.e.pile-
driving),reducing the vibrations during construction and potential structural impacts to
surrounding structures during construction.Compared to the other site alternatives,this site is
the farthest distance from the nearby residences.
Following presentations from staff and consultants,public testimony,and deliberation by the City
Council,unanimous direction was provided to staff and the Redondo Beach Development Council
Subcommittee,consisting of Mayor Armato and Councilmember Fangary (Hermosa Subcommittee),
to jointly engage the City of Redondo Beach and/or City of Torrance to discuss 1)relocating the
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 8 of 12
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0191
to jointly engage the City of Redondo Beach and/or City of Torrance to discuss 1)relocating the
infiltration project,at its current volume,outside of Hermosa Beach,or 2)dividing the Project into
multiple smaller projects totaling a similar stormwater capture volume,with an understanding that the
division of projects may include one or more smaller scale projects in Hermosa Beach and/or the
expansion of the Hermosa Beach Infiltration Trench Project currently in the EWMP.
Discussion:
On November 6,2018,the Redondo Beach City Council elected a subcommittee comprised of
Councilmember Christian Horvath and Councilmember Todd Loewenstein (Redondo Subcommittee)
to meet with the Hermosa Subcommittee.The Hermosa Subcommittee and Redondo Subcommittee,
along with Redondo Beach Mayor Bill Brand,met on December 5,2018 to discuss the scope of work
and current project expenditures,as well as the additional costs associated with further site
assessments and developing an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that would satisfy the EWMP.
Members of both subcommittees discussed public and private parcels in Redondo Beach as potential
alternative project sites.Despite these discussions,there was no consensus on further pursuing a
site in Redondo Beach, and the Redondo Subcommittee declined invitations for further meetings.
On December 20,2018,after delays on the Project resulted in a violation of the terms and conditions
of the Funding Agreement,the State Board issued a Breach of Agreement notice to the City.The
notice required the City to provide all delinquent submittals and to submit invoices,Project deviation
and time extension request forms,a new budget and schedule and applicable updates by February
28,2019.On February 21,2019,the City submitted the following requested information,including a
Deviation Request Form that noted the City’s search for an alternative site:
·Project Director Certification (Necessary update to our project director and designee contact
information due to staff turnover in our Public Works Department)
·Project Deviation Request Form (Outlining a proposed deviation from the original scope of
work as staff and the City Council Subcommittee have been engaging the City’s project
partners on potential alternative site locations within the vicinity of the Herondo storm drain)
·Request for Time Extension (Necessary revisions to the original project schedule to account
for delays and additional time anticipated for the environmental impact report process)
The State Board notified the City on March 15,2019 that despite receiving all of the requested
materials outlined in the Breach of Agreement,the City remains in breach of the Funding Agreement
until a complete proposal identifying a new site is received.
The State Board Division of Financial Assistance will immediately recommend that the Prop 1 Grant
be withdrawn if the City is not prepared to move forward with the Project under the terms of the
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 9 of 12
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0191
be withdrawn if the City is not prepared to move forward with the Project under the terms of the
Funding Agreement.City staff asked State Board staff to delay this recommendation until after the
March 26,2019 City Council meeting.The City has until April 1,2019 to notify the State Board on
whether it will proceed with the Project.
The City’s grant recipient and lead agency obligations include administering the Funding Agreement
and carrying out the design,approval and construction of the Project.The Beach Cities WMG was
notified of the State Board’s Breach of Agreement notice.On February 4,2019,City staff met with
staff from Redondo Beach,Manhattan Beach,and Torrance to discuss how to proceed with a project
under the current MOU to retain the Prop 1 Grant.At this meeting,Manhattan Beach,Torrance,and
Redondo Beach staff expressed that if the original MOU cannot be executed,they would like the
Hermosa Beach City Council to send a letter to their respective City Councils asking their
counterparts to dissolve the MOU and forfeit the Prop 1 Grant.
The City has been provided the opportunity by the State Board to correct the violations or submit
alternative project plans and other forms to allow the State Board to consider substitution of the
Project.An alternative project,however,would need to meet the Prop 1 Grant requirements,
demonstrate similar water quality benefits to the Project,and be approved by both the State Board
and Regional Board through an EWMP amendment.
Alternatively,City Council may choose to abandon the Project by initiating an amendment or
dissolution of the MOU and relinquish the Prop 1 Grant.Regarding the City’s EWMP compliance,the
City would need to provide notice to the Regional Board that it is terminating the MOU.Prior to this
occurring,staff will need to meet with the Regional Board to determine how they would view such
termination and what alternative requirements it would accept to stay in compliance with the EWMP.
Staff recommends that City Council consider and provide direction on the following three options to
address the requirements of the Grant Agreement and cost-sharing MOU for the Project:
1.Proceed with a project at the existing Greenbelt location; or
2.Proceed with a project at an alternative location within the City’s jurisdiction to capture and
treat the equivalent volume of stormwater; or
3.Initiate a dissolution or an amendment of the MOU and negotiate a suitable substitute or
revised MOU and project with the City’s partners, relinquish the Grant and forfeit the grant
funding.
City staff will notify the State Board of the City Council’s decision and determine next steps on how to
proceed with complying with the MS4 Permit.
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 10 of 12
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0191
General Plan Consistency:
PLAN Hermosa,the City’s General Plan,was adopted by the City Council in August 2017.The
construction of an infiltration system to capture and infiltrate stormwater supports several PLAN
Hermosa goals and policies that are listed below.
1.8 Reduce stormwater runoff.Reduce stormwater runoff consistent with local stormwater
permits.
4.3 Collaboration with adjacent jurisdictions.Maintain strong collaborative relationships with
adjacent jurisdictions and work together on projects of mutual interest and concern.
4.8 Holistic systems planning.Develop a comprehensive approach to water infrastructure that
integrates sewer system planning with potable and recycled water systems,stormwater
systems, and increased conservation awareness.
5.7 Stormwater permits.Strictly implement,enforce,and monitor MS4 National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) Permit requirements through stormwater ordinances.
Fiscal Impact:
This project budget total is $7,336,180 and the costs are distributed among the Beach Cities
agencies based on a cost-sharing formula outlined in the MOU for project design.The cost-sharing
formula is based on capture responsibility for the tributary area to the project after subtracting the
treatment capacity of the City of Torrance Stormwater Basin Enhancement Project.The City of
Hermosa Beach’s share for design costs is $115,550.50 (13.6%)and the current estimate for the City
of Hermosa Beach share of construction costs is $460,651.59,for a total project budget of
$576,202.09.The current project expenditures are shown in Table 1 for each City based on the cost-
sharing formula outlined in the MOU.
Table 1. Project Expenditures
City Cost -share
(%)
Total
Expenditures
Redondo Beach 50.8 $118,833.37
Torrance 33.1 $77,428.83
Hermosa Beach 13.6 $31,813.66
Manhattan Beach 2.5 $5,848.09
Total $233,923.95
Should Council decide to proceed with a project at the existing Greenbelt location there would be an
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 11 of 12
powered by Legistar™
Staff Report
REPORT 19-0191
Should Council decide to proceed with a project at the existing Greenbelt location there would be an
additional cost of $130,000 for preparing the project environmental impact report.Relocating the site
to another site within the City would require an amendment to Tetra Tech’s scope of work and budget,
and is estimated to cost an additional $50,000 for additional design services.The location of the site
would determine the extent and cost of additional environmental analysis.These cost increases
would need to be approved by each of the Beach Cities agencies through an amendment to the MOU
for the cost sharing for project design.Abandonment of the Project may entail costs that are unknown
at this time.Should City Council decide to initiate a dissolution or an amendment of the MOU and
negotiate a suitable substitute or revised MOU and project with the City’s partners,relinquish the
Grant and forfeit the grant funding costs would include forfeiting current design expenditure and the
cost to design and construct a project at alternative location (s)with or without partnerships with
Beach Cities WMG agencies.
Attachments:
1.Grant Agreement
2.MOU for cost sharing
3.Link to project page and presentations
4.Tetra Tech Presentation (June 19, 2018)
5.Greenbelt North of 2nd Street
6.South Park
7.Herondo Street at Valley Drive
8.October 9, 2018 Alternative Site Presentations
9.Memorandum of discussions with Redondo Beach staff
10.SCE Response to Redondo Beach Enquiry
11.Alondra Park Project
Respectfully Submitted by: Kristy Morris, Environmental Analyst
Noted for Fiscal Impact:Viki Copeland, Finance Director
Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved:Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 12 of 12
powered by Legistar™
PROJECT DESIGN 06Current Status
ORIGINAL EWMP CONCEPT
PLAN VIEW
PROFILE VIEW
COMPLETED ITEMS TO DATE
Geotechnical Investigation
Preliminary Liquefaction Analysis
Topographic Survey
Utility Research
Tree Survey and Tree Analysis
Preliminary Water Quality Analysis
Alternative Site Evaluation
Alternative Layouts
EXISTING SITE STUDIES 07
GEOSYNTEC
GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATION
Existing Soil Conditions
Layers of medium dense to dense
poorly graded sands
Intermittent layers of well-graded sand,
clayey sands, and silty sand
Active Faults
Compton Fault – 1.5 mi away
Palos Verdes Fault – 2.5 mi away
Low potential for fault ground rupture
GEOSYNTEC
GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATION
Groundwater LevelEncountered at 24.5’ to 27’ bgs
Historic high groundwater at 10’ bgs
LiquefactionFound to occur in 2 borings
Large liquefaction zone is not expected
but a further advanced liquefaction
analysis is recommended during the
design
Infiltration Rate4.4 in/hr for design
bgs = below ground surface
TETRA TECH REVIEW OF GEOSYNTEC
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Infiltration
Adjusted design infiltration rate – 0.5 in/hr
Adjusted in accordance with the County of LA guidelines
Liquefaction
Soils between 10’ and 51.5’ bgs are susceptible to liquefaction
Additional Testing Recommendations
Large scale percolation testing
Corrosion testing
GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION
Tt encountered groundwater at 24’ to +31.5’ bgs during field exploration
Geosyntec’s site-specific information indicates groundwater depth greater than 20’ bgs
Several wells show groundwater depth at 21’ bgs
LACDPW Well 704E – 21.6’ bgs in April 1980 (shallowest depth)
Groundwater elevation contours (Figure 2.1) of the Regional Groundwater Monitoring Reports
by the Water Replenishment District (WRD) of Southern California
Meant for regional studies – not site-specific
All monitoring wells used to develop contours are east of the project site
–Closest well is located approximately 1.5 miles northeast of the project site
Conclusion – Contours are not necessarily accurate for this project site and must be used with caution
GEOSYNTEC PHASE 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
(ESA)
No evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs)
Potential for environmental impacts and/or contaminated underlying soils with contaminants of
concern (COCs) at the following locations:
Onsite due to past use as a rail corridor
West of site (across Valley Drive) due to historic presence of a gas generation and distribution facility
Within 500’ of the site due to the presence of 2 oil and gas wells
–Status of wells is listed as “plugged”
–Violations and/or leaks were not documented
AES Redondo Beach – natural gas power plant
–Listed on the Dept. of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) database as an active cleanup site with potential COCs
–Groundwater monitoring is required at facility
UTILITY ANALYSIS
NTS
UTILITY RELOCATION
NTS
TREE SURVEY
Tree survey performed byAmericanArbor Care (report dated 2/5/2018)
(E) TREE IN GOOD HEALTH (44)
(E) TREE SUITABLE TO BE RELOCATED (14)
(E) TREE IN POOR HEALTH (53)
NTS
TREE SURVEY
Species
21 species found onsite
Most (19) are not native to CA
Native Trees
California Fan Palm
Torrey Pine*
Invasive Trees
Brazilian Pepper
Portugal Laurel
*Planted outside of its
natural habitat
TORREY PINETORREY PINE
CALIFORNIA FAN
PALM
CALIFORNIA FAN
PALM
PORTUGAL LAURALPORTUGAL LAURAL BRAZILIAN PEPPERBRAZILIAN PEPPER
TREE PROTECTION ANALYSIS
NTS
PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
Parameter EWMP Tetra Tech
Watershed 1,800 acres 1,980 acres
Annual Runoff Volume
Generated by Watershed 2,118 ac-ft 3,622 ac-ft
Optimum Forebay Size -2.0 ac-ft
Volume Captured and Infiltrated
by Project 25.5%1 5.1%2
Target Pollutant Bacteria – Fecal Coliform
Load Reduced 15.1%1 5.0%2
1Infiltration rate: 12 in/hr
2Infiltration rate: 0.5 in/hr – adjusted to County guidelines
ALTERNATIVE SITE STUDIES 08and Site Constraints
Current Design AlternativePump station (size TBD)
6.8 ac-ft storage and infiltration volume
Option 1A – Force Main to South Park48 cfs pump station
7.9 ac-ft storage and infiltration volume
Option 1B – Gravity Diversion to South Park
10 cfs pump station at South Park
2.0 ac-ft storage and 5.9 ac-ft infiltration
Option 2 – Force Main to North of 2
nd Street10 cfs pump station
2.0 ac-ft storage and 5.0 ac-ft infiltration
Option 3 – Herondo Street10 cfs pump station
2.0 ac-ft storage and 5.0 infiltration
Deep excavation (±14’ to 51’ bgs)
ALTERNATIVE SITE
STUDIES
SOUTH PARKSOUTH PARK
CURRENT DESIGN
ALTERNATIVE
NTS
Diversion
Structure
Pretreatment
Device
Pump Station
(Size TBD)
Infiltration Gallery
CURRENT DESIGN ALTERNATIVE
Settling
Area
Groundwater Elevation
CURRENT DESIGN ALTERNATIVE
NTS
TRAILHEAD – BEFORE
TRAILHEAD – AFTER
OPTION 1A –FORCE MAIN
TO SOUTH PARK
NTS
OPTION 1B –GRAVITY DIVERSION
TO SOUTH PARK
NTS
OPTION 2 –FORCE MAIN TO NORTH
OF 2 ND STREET
NTS
OPTION 3 –HERONDO STREET
NTS
INITIAL ASSESSMENT 09of Liquefaction Impacts
SEISMIC
HAZARD ZONES
MAP
PROJECT
LOCATION
Note:
Seismic demand per 2016 CBC has increased since
this map was produced. Therefore, the areas that
are likely to be susceptible to liquefaction may be
larger than those indicated on the map.
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS
Findings
Onsite soils found 10’ - 51.5’ bgs are susceptible to liquefaction
Materials above the groundwater table are not considered susceptible to liquefaction
Combined Dynamic Settlement
Ranges from 6.9” to 9.6”
Combination of liquefaction settlement and settlement of dry sands
Differential Settlement
About 1.6” anticipated over a span of 10’ following a design seismic event – without liquefaction
mitigation
Recommendation
A geogrid-reinforced gravel raft placed below the infiltration units
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS
Additional Notes to Keep in Mind
Proposed project does not alter the existing liquefaction hazard at the site
Effects of groundwater mounding below nearby existing structures at a horizontal distance of
about 30’ from the perimeter of the BMP is minimal – less than 0.5’
Based on preliminary calculations
Infiltration does not change the existing groundwater conditions and liquefaction hazard below those properties
High degree of conservatism embedded in the estimation of liquefaction triggering and
associated deformations
Groundwater at the site has been deeper than 21’ in the last 50 years (per local well information from LACDPW
and the Geosyntec field exploration)
Most of the seismically-induced settlement (about 60%) takes place within this 21’ zone, which is in fact not
likely to experience liquefaction and the associated settlement
NEXT DESIGN STEPS 10
Additional liquefaction analysis
Pump station design
Water quality analysis
Aboveground equipment
layout
Plant palette
Monitoring plan
Predesign report
NEXT DESIGN
STEPS
SD
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
SS
SD
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
EM
H
FH
FH
FH
FH
FH
FH
FH
FH
CB
CB
WV
WV
W
V
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WVWV
WV
WV
WV
W
V
WV
WV
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
W
M
WM
WM
WMWM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM WMWM WM
SS
GV
SS TBEMRW8''RW
SDSD
SD
SD
SD
SDSD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SS
SS
SS
SS
UE
UEUEEB
G
G
G
G
UT
UT
UTUTUTUTUTUT8''W
8''W
8''W8''W8''W8'
'W8''W8''W
8''W
8''W
6''WOE
OE
OE
OE OEOEOE8''W
8''W 6''W6''W6''W6''WUEUEUE12''RW12'
'RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''R
W
12''R
W
12''R
W
12''R
W
12''R
W24''SS24''SS24''SS24''SS6''W6''W6''WOE6''W6''W6''WGOEUE
SD
8''SS
8''SS
24''SS24''SSHER
O
N
D
O
S
T
R
E
E
T
2ND STR
E
E
T
THEGALLERYAPARTMENTSPLAYAPACIFICAAPARTMENTSBEACHSIDECONDOMINIUMSMINISTORAGEARDMOREPLACECONDOMINIUMSVALLEY DRIVETHE MOORING APARTMENTSVALLEY DRIVEARDMORE AVENUERESIDENTIALCONDOMINIUMS3RD STREE
T
4TH STREETSOUTHPARK
BI-CENTENNIALPARKARDMOREPARK1ST
S
T
R
E
E
T
1ST
P
L
A
C
ECULPER COURTMONTEREY BOULEVARDRESIDENTIALHOUSESRESIDENTIALHOUSES3RD
S
T
R
E
E
T
4TH STREET6TH STREETCYPRESS AVENUESD
SD
SD
SD
SDSD
SD
S
D
SDSD
SD
S
D
DIVERSION STRUCTUREINV: 7.1±ACTUATED VALVEPRETREATMENTDEVICEPUMP STATION(48 CFS)20" FORCE MAIN(±5' BGS)36" RCPUNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERY17,167 SF9.5' DEEP3.4 AC-FTUNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERY18,200 SF9.5' DEEP3.6 AC-FTEQUALIZATION PIPEMARKDATEDESCRIPTIONBYProject No.:www.tetratech.comChecked By:Drawn By:Designed By:6/15/2018 9:44:23 AM - O:\PROJECTS\IRVINE\165684\200-165684-18001\CAD\CONCEPTUAL\EH-SITEEVALUATION-OPTION2.DWG - PANGILINAN, ELVA 1A234567BCDEFBar Measures 1 inchCopyright: Tetra Tech 200-165684-18001HERMOSA BEACH GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECTCITY OF HERMOSA BEACHEH-2SITE EVALUATIONOPTION 2 - FORCE MAINTO NORTH OF 2ND STREET0SCALE:30'60'120'1" = 60'N NOTES1.EXISTING GRADE WITHIN THE HERMOSA VALLEY GREENBELT NORTH OF 2ND STREET ISESTIMATED AT 34 FEET PER GOOGLE EARTH PRO.2.UTILITY RESEARCH, GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY REQUIRED FORTHE HERMOSA VALLEY GREENBELT NORTH OF 2ND STREET.3.GROUNDWATER ELEVATION IS ASSUMED TO BE 29 FEET BGS.4.INVERT ELEVATION OF UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERY ASSUMED TO BE 20 FEET (10 FEETABOVE ASSUMED GROUNDWATER).5.INSIDE STORAGE DEPTH OF UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERY ASSUMED TO BE 9.5 FEET.6.IT IS ASSUMED THAT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES CAN BE RELOCATED.7.10 CFS PUMP STATION CAN BE USED IF 2 AC-FT DETENTION BASIN IS INSTALLED UPSTREAM.8.LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT NOT SHOWN.
SD
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
SS
SD
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
EM
H
FH
FH
FH
FH
FH
FH
FH
FH
CB
CB
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
W
V
WV
WV
W
V
WV
WV
W
V
WVWV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WMWM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM WMWM WM
SS
GV
SS TBEMRW8''RW
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
S
D
SD
SD
SD
SS
SS
SS
SS
UE
UEUEUEEB
G
G
G
G
G
UT
UT
UT
UTUTUTUTUTUT8''W
8''W
8''W8''W8''W8''W8'
'W8''W8''W
8''W
8''W
8''W
6''W6''WOE
OE
OE
OE OEOEOE8''W
8''W 6''W6''W6''W6''W6''WUEUEUEUE12''RW12'
'RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''R
W
12''R
W
12''R
W
12''R
W24''SS24''SS
24''SS24''SS24''SS6''W6''W6''WOE6''W6''W6''W6''WGGOEUE
SD
8''SS
8''SS
8''SS
24''SS24''SSHER
O
N
D
O
S
T
R
E
E
T
2ND STR
E
E
T
THEGALLERYAPARTMENTSPLAYAPACIFICAAPARTMENTSBEACHSIDECONDOMINIUMSMINISTORAGEARDMOREPLACECONDOMINIUMSVALLEY DRIVETHE MOORINGAPARTMENTSVALLEY DRIVEARDMORE AVENUERESIDENTIALCONDOMINIUMS3RD STRE
E
T
4TH STREETSOUTHPARKBI-CENTENNIALPARKARDMOREPARKUNDERGROUNDINFILTRATIONGALLERY27,200 SF14' STORAGE DEPTH7.9 AC-FTDIVERSIONSTRUCTUREINV: 7.1±ACTUATEDVALVEPRETREATMENTDEVICEPUMP STATION(48 CFS, SEENOTE 7)1ST
S
T
R
E
E
T
1ST
P
L
A
C
ECULPER COURTMONTEREY BOULEVARD20" FORCE MAIN(±5' BGS)RESIDENTIALHOUSESRESIDENTIALHOUSESINV: 20.036" RCPMARKDATEDESCRIPTIONBYProject No.:www.tetratech.comChecked By:Drawn By:Designed By:5/30/2018 1:07:53 PM - O:\PROJECTS\IRVINE\165684\200-165684-18001\CAD\CONCEPTUAL\EH-SITEEVALUATION-OPTION1A.DWG - PANGILINAN, ELVA 1A234567BCDEFBar Measures 1 inchCopyright: Tetra Tech 200-165684-18001HERMOSA BEACH GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECTCITY OF HERMOSA BEACHEH-1ASITE EVALUATIONOPTION 1A - FORCE MAINTO SOUTH PARK0SCALE:25'50'100'1" = 50'N NOTES1.EXISTING GRADE AT SOUTH PARK IS ESTIMATED AT 39 FEET PER GOOGLE EARTH PRO.2.UTILITY RESEARCH, GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY REQUIRED FORSOUTH PARK AND HERMOSA VALLEY GREENBELT NORTH OF 2ND STREET.3.GROUNDWATER ELEVATION AT SOUTH PARK ASSUMED TO BE 29 FEET BGS.4.INVERT ELEVATION OF UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERY ASSUMED TO BE 20 FEET (10 FEETABOVE ASSUMED GROUNDWATER).5.INSIDE STORAGE DEPTH OF UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERY ASSUMED TO BE 14 FEET.6.IT IS ASSUMED THAT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IN SOUTH PARK AND HERMOSA VALLEY GREENBELTNORTH OF 2ND STREET CAN BE RELOCATED.7.10 CFS PUMP STATION CAN BE USED IF 2 AC-FT DETENTION BASIN IS INSTALLED UPSTREAM.
SD
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
SS
SD
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
EM
H
FH
FH
FH
FH
FH
FH
FH
FH
CB
CB
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
W
V
WV
WV
W
V
WV
WV
W
V
WVWV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WMWM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM WMWM WM
SS
GV
SS TBEMRW8''RW
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
S
D
SD
SD
SD
SS
SS
SS
SS
UE
UEUEUEEB
G
G
G
G
G
UT
UT
UT
UTUTUTUTUTUT8''W
8''W
8''W8''W8''W8''W8'
'W8''W8''W
8''W
8''W
8''W
6''W6''WOE
OE
OE
OE OEOEOE8''W
8''W 6''W6''W6''W6''W6''WUEUEUEUE12''RW12'
'RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''R
W
12''R
W
12''R
W
12''R
W24''SS24''SS
24''SS24''SS24''SS6''W6''W6''WOE6''W6''W6''W6''WGGOEUE
SD
8''SS
8''SS
8''SS
24''SS24''SSHER
O
N
D
O
S
T
R
E
E
T
2ND STR
E
E
T
THEGALLERYAPARTMENTSPLAYAPACIFICAAPARTMENTSBEACHSIDECONDOMINIUMSMINISTORAGEARDMOREPLACECONDOMINIUMSVALLEY DRIVETHE MOORINGAPARTMENTSVALLEY DRIVEARDMORE AVENUERESIDENTIALCONDOMINIUMS3RD STRE
E
T
4TH STREETSOUTHPARKBI-CENTENNIALPARKARDMOREPARKUNDERGROUNDINFILTRATIONGALLERY27,200 SF14' STORAGE DEPTH7.9 AC-FTDIVERSIONSTRUCTUREINV: 7.1±ACTUATEDVALVEPRETREATMENTDEVICE1ST
S
T
R
E
E
T
1ST
P
L
A
C
ECULPER COURTMONTEREY BOULEVARDRESIDENTIALHOUSESRESIDENTIALHOUSESINV: -0.3±36" RCP36" GRAVITY MAIN(±31.5 BGS, AVG.)2 AC-FT DETENTION AREAWITH 10 CFS PUMP STATIONOR 48 CFS PUMP STATIONMARKDATEDESCRIPTIONBYProject No.:www.tetratech.comChecked By:Drawn By:Designed By:5/30/2018 1:28:35 PM - O:\PROJECTS\IRVINE\165684\200-165684-18001\CAD\CONCEPTUAL\EH-SITEEVALUATION-OPTION1B.DWG - PANGILINAN, ELVA 1A234567BCDEFBar Measures 1 inchCopyright: Tetra Tech 200-165684-18001HERMOSA BEACH GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECTCITY OF HERMOSA BEACHEH-1BSITE EVALUATIONOPTION 1B - GRAVITY DIVERSIONTO SOUTH PARK0SCALE:25'50'100'1" = 50'N NOTES1.EXISTING GRADE AT SOUTH PARK IS ESTIMATED AT 39 FEET PER GOOGLE EARTH PRO.2.UTILITY RESEARCH, GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY REQUIRED FORSOUTH PARK AND HERMOSA VALLEY GREENBELT NORTH OF 2ND STREET.3.GROUNDWATER ELEVATION AT SOUTH PARK ASSUMED TO BE 29 FEET BGS.4.INVERT ELEVATION OF UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERY ASSUMED TO BE 20 FEET (10 FEETABOVE ASSUMED GROUNDWATER).5.INSIDE STORAGE DEPTH OF UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERY ASSUMED TO BE 14 FEET.6.IT IS ASSUMED THAT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IN SOUTH PARK AND HERMOSA VALLEY GREENBELTNORTH OF 2ND STREET CAN BE RELOCATED.7.2 AC-FT DETENTION AREA AND PUMP STATION IS LOCATED BELOW ASSUMED GROUNDWATER.
SSSSSSSDSSSDSSSSSSSSSSSDEMHFHFHFHFHCBWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVUBUBUBUBUBCBCBCBCBCBCBWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMSSGVSSTBEMRW8''RWSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSSSSUEUEUEUEUEGGGGGUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUT8''W8''W8''W8''W8''W8''WOEOEOEOE
OE8''W8''W8''W6''W6''W6''W6''WUEUE12''RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''RW12''RW24''SS24''SS24''SS6''W6''W6''W6''W6''WGGOEOESD12''RW
24''
S
S24''SS24''SS24''SS24''SSHERONDO STREETBEACHSIDECONDOMINIUMSMINISTORAGEARDMOREPLACECONDOMINIUMSVALLEY DRIVETHE MOORING APARTMENTSARD
M
O
R
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
1ST STREETHERONDO STREETN FRANCISCA AVENUEPACIFIC COAST HIGHWAYN C
A
T
A
L
IN
A
A
V
ENU
EAES REDONDO BEACHPOWER PLANTCOMMERCIALBUILDINGUNDERGROUNDINFILTRATION GALLERY33,044 SF9.5' STORAGE DEPTH6.5 AC-FTSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDDIVERSIONSTRUCTUREINV: 12.8±ACTUATED VALVEPRETREATMENTDEVICEPUMP STATION(48 CFS)EQUALIZATIONPIPESUNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERY5,421 SF9.5' STORAGE DEPTH1.1 AC-FTINV: 20'(±20' BGS)INV: 20'(±14' BGS)INV: 20'(±22' BGS)INV: 20'(±51' BGS)PRIVATE PROPERTYALTERNATEPRETREATMENTAND PUMP STATIONLOCATIONFS: 33'FITNESS CENTERMARKDATEDESCRIPTIONBYProject No.:www.tetratech.comChecked By:Drawn By:Designed By:6/15/2018 10:13:39 AM - O:\PROJECTS\IRVINE\165684\200-165684-18001\CAD\CONCEPTUAL\EH-SITEEVALUATION-OPTION3.DWG - PANGILINAN, ELVA 1A234567BCDEFBar Measures 1 inchCopyright: Tetra Tech 200-165684-18001HERMOSA BEACH GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECTCITY OF HERMOSA BEACHEH-3SITE EVALUATIONOPTION 3 - HERONDO STREET0SCALE:20'40'80'1" = 40'NOTES1.EXISTING ELEVATIONS ALONG HERONDO STREET AT UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERYLOCATION RANGE FROM 34 FEET TO 71 FEET PER GOOGLE EARTH PRO.2.UTILITY RESEARCH, GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY REQUIRED FORHERONDO STREET BETWEEN THE PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND VALLEY DRIVE.3.GROUNDWATER ELEVATION ASSUMED TO BE 29 FEET BGS.4.INVERT ELEVATION OF UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERY ASSUMED TO BE 20 FEET (10 FEETABOVE ASSUMED GROUNDWATER).5.INSIDE STORAGE DEPTH OF UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERY ASSUMED TO BE 9.5 FEET.6.IT IS ASSUMED THAT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES CAN BE RELOCATED.7.LOCATION OF DIVERSION STRUCTURE AND PUMP STATION MAY NEED TO BE MOVED. CURRENTLOCATION SHOWN IS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND MAY PRESENT SPATIAL CONSTRAINTS.8.LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT NOT SHOWN.NCHALLENGES1.PRECAST STRUCTURES MOST LIKELY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SUPPORT THE BURIAL DEPTH.2.USING A CAST-IN-PLACE STRUCTURE WILL RESULT IN AN EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE.3.HERONDO STREET WILL BE CLOSED TO TRAFFIC FOR ABOUT ONE YEAR.4.LIMITED ACCESS TO FITNESS CENTER.5.MOST VACTOR TRUCKS HAVE A 20-FOOT TO 30-FOOT DEPTH LIMIT FOR MAINTENANCE.
October 9,
2018
1
2
4
3
2
NTS
•
•
•
•
•
•
NTS
NTS
NTS
•
•
•
•
•
•
NTS
NTS
•
•
•
•Deep excavation
•Utility relocation
•Demolition & rebuild of median constructed in 2015 (Harbor Drive Project).
•
•
NTS
NTS
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
City of Hermosa Beach
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
MEMORANDUM
To: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach
From: Kristy Morris, Environmental Analyst, City of Hermosa Beach
CC: Nico De Anda-Scaia, Assistant to the City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach
Glen Kau, Public Works Director, City of Hermosa Beach
Stacy Armato, Mayor Pro Tem
Hany Fangary, Councilmember
Date: 10/24/2018
Re: Communication with the City of Redondo Beach Public Works staff regarding the Greenbelt
Infiltration project
Comments: This memorandum provides a summary of communications with City of Redondo Beach Public
Works staff pertaining to alternative sites located in Redondo Beach for the Greenbelt Infiltration
Project.
Background
At the October 9, 2018 meeting City Council considered alternative locations for the Greenbelt
Infiltration Project. Following presentations from staff and consultants, public testimony, and
deliberation by the City Council, unanimous direction was provided to:
1. Direct the Redondo Development Subcommittee, consisting of Councilmember Fangary and
Mayor Pro Tem Armato, and staff to jointly engage the City of Redondo and/or City of
Torrance to discuss potential alternative site locations that include 1) relocating the infiltration
project, at its current volume, outside of Hermosa Beach’s City boundaries or 2) dividing the
infiltration project into multiple smaller projects totaling a similar stormwater capture volume,
with an understanding that the division of projects may include one or more smaller scale
projects in Hermosa Beach and/or the expansion of the Hermosa Beach Infiltration Trench
Project currently in the Enhanced Watershed Management Plan.
2. Direct the Redondo Development Subcommittee and staff to return with a report to update
City Council at a meeting in November.
On October 16, 2018, City of Hermosa Beach staff met with City of Redondo Beach staff including
the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and Civil Engineer (Beach Cities Watershed Group
representative) to update them on the direction from Hermosa Beach Council and explore potential
sites, not previously discussed in Redondo Beach. A summary of this discussion is provided below.
Redondo Beach staff expressed that they will require formal direction from their City Council to
engage in site-scoping activities. Redondo Beach City Council will discuss this item during a
November 2018 meeting and Redondo staff will request that their Council consider appointing
representatives to work with Hermosa Beach Councilmembers on exploring alternative sites.
City of Hermosa Beach
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
Staff further discussed alternative sites located in Redondo Beach and obtained additional
information related to future development and ownership of private and public parcels (Exhibit 1).
The location underneath N. Francisca Street was previously identified as a potential site directly
south of the existing location in Hermosa Beach. City of Redondo Beach staff discussed plans to
realign the street, however realignment plans or a construction timeline are not known. Redondo
Beach staff suggested that this would be an unfavorable location for the infiltration project at this time
and expressed concern regarding the number of utilities to be navigated and potential soil
contamination.
The large parcel directly south of the SCE property is approximately 2.4 acres and is privately
owned. City of Redondo Beach staff said they believe the property owner is looking to sell the
property for over $10M.
The United States Postal Service (federal government) owns the property directly east of this site
and south of the SCE parcel. The parking lot in the north-east corner of the parcel may be a suitable
location for a small project. Redondo Beach staff discussed the potential challenges and delays
associated with working with the USPS on a project of this nature. Additionally, the Herondo Drain is
greater than 50 feet below the ground surface at the intersection of Herondo Street and Pacific Coast
Highway, increasing technical challenges for the design and construction. This would be a similar
situation for the US Bank-owned property directly north of this site.
Staff also discussed the parcel east of Pacific Coast Highway that was recently vacated by the Land
Rover car dealership. The property is owned by the Carwell Corporation who could be approached to
consider leasing their property for the project. This would be unlikely and significantly increase the
project costs. Access to the Herondo Drain would be an additional challenge at this location.
Following the meeting, the City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Director and Environmental Analyst
discussed additional potential sites including underneath Herondo Street and a combination of
smaller public and private parcels to achieve the desired capture volume (Exhibit 2).
A number of smaller projects could achieve the required capture volume, at a much higher cost and
permission to use these parcels is unknown (Exhibit 2-Area 1).
Underneath Herondo Street was presented to City Council at the October 9 meeting as a Hermosa
Beach site alternative, however the majority of this project is located in Redondo Beach. The most
significant considerations are the design challenges and additional cost associated with the deep
excavation and demolition and construction of the center landscape median that was recently
constructed in 2015 as part of the Harbor/ Herondo Gateway Improvement Project. Construction cost
estimates for this location are estimated to exceed $10M and most vactor trucks have a 20-foot to
30-foot depth limit for ongoing maintenance activities. Staff conducted a preliminary review of
existing utility maps and it appears the project location could be relocated east or west of the
alternative project location to avoid the existing utilities (Exhibit 2-Area 2- LA County storm culvert,
electrical, gas, sanitary sewer, reclaimed water, etc.). Local traffic and residents will be significantly
disrupted during construction as a result of lane/road closures, however two lanes could remain open
if the construction is phased.
Following the November Redondo Beach meeting, staff will work with Redondo Beach staff to
explore these sites further.
City of Hermosa Beach
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
AES and SCE Properties.
Hermosa Beach City Councilmembers requested contact information for the SCE and AES sites to
follow-up regarding site permissions. Staff previously spoke with the following representatives that
advised that an infiltration project would not be permitted on these properties:
Eric Pendergraft
US Business Development | The AES Corporation
| T: 562.493.7855 | Mobile: 714.943.5477
eric.pendergraft@aes.com
690 N. Studebaker Road, Long Beach, CA 90803
Nick Brown
Right of Way Agent
T&D Real Properties
T. 909-274-1882
Nicholas.Brown@sce.com
2 Innovation Way, Pomona, CA 91768
Maria Parcell
Land Services Agent 4
Southern California Edison Company
T&D – E&TS - Real Properties - Land Management Metro R/W (PIV2)
Direct Phone 909-274-1877 // Internal Phone 61877 // maria.parcell@sce.com
2 Innovation Way, 2nd Floor, Pomona, CA 91768
1
Ann Yang
From:Kristy Morris
Sent:Monday, February 11, 2019 10:54 AM
To:'Geraldine Trivedi'
Cc:Ted Semaan; Andrew Winje
Subject:RE: Inquiry on Potential Use of SCE R/W - Catalina/Herondo/N Francisca - City of Redondo Beach
Thank you for sharing Geraldine. Kristy
From: Geraldine Trivedi [mailto:Geraldine.Trivedi@redondo.org]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2019 12:54 PM
To: Kristy Morris <kmorris@hermosabch.org>
Cc: Ted Semaan <Ted.Semaan@redondo.org>; Andrew Winje <Andrew.Winje@redondo.org>
Subject: FW: Inquiry on Potential Use of SCE R/W ‐ Catalina/Herondo/N Francisca ‐ City of Redondo Beach
Kristy,
We wanted to forward the following email in which SCE denied the use of their property for infiltration for your records
and use. There is another unrelated project discussed (N Redondo Bike Path Improvement Project) that you can
disregard.
Thank you,
Geraldine
From: Nicholas Brown <Nicholas.Brown@sce.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 1:18 PM
To: Ted Semaan <Ted.Semaan@redondo.org>
Cc: Geraldine Trivedi <Geraldine.Trivedi@redondo.org>; Andrew Winje <Andrew.Winje@redondo.org>; Vic Nol
<Vic.Nol@sce.com>; Andrew Nichiporuk <Andrew.Nichiporuk@sce.com>
Subject: RE: (External):RE: (External):FW: Inquiry on Potential Use of SCE R/W ‐ Catalina/Herondo/N Francisca ‐ City of
Redondo Beach
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.City Logo
ATTN: Email is from an external source; Stop, Look, and Think before opening attachments or links.
Hi Ted,
At this time, we’re going to have to deny the infiltration use inquiry. Our Secondary Land Use Policy does not permit
permanent structures, such as the ones that would need to be constructed for the requested use, to be placed within
SCE’s ROW.
I appreciate the time you put together gathering information related to the request and apologize it took a little while to
get an answer back to you, but I wanted to make sure the request was properly vetted.
2
As far as the North Redondo Bike Path improvement project, all of SCE’s comments have been provided to the City’s
engineering contractor. We’re just waiting for updates to the plans to be made and for revised plans to be submitted so
SCE’s Engineers for final review and approval.
If you have any other questions, please let me know.
Regards,
Nick Brown
Right of Way Agent
T&D Real Properties
T. 909‐274‐1882
2 Innovation Way, Pomona, CA 91768
From: Ted Semaan [mailto:Ted.Semaan@redondo.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 4:03 PM
To: Nicholas Brown <Nicholas.Brown@sce.com>; Vic Nol <Vic.Nol@sce.com>
Cc: Geraldine Trivedi <Geraldine.Trivedi@redondo.org>; Andrew Winje <Andrew.Winje@redondo.org>
Subject: (External):FW: Inquiry on Potential Use of SCE R/W ‐ Catalina/Herondo/N Francisca ‐ City of Redondo Beach
Hi Nick and Vic, thanks to Geraldine, her email below contains additional information and
other similar project details that should help you assess the magnitude of the request.
The Los Amigos Park, hyper linked below (bolded and highlighted), has a good album of
photo’s on the projects front page of the process and structures constructed.
If you think this is possible, we can have consultants start drafting project specific
documentation, conceptual and engineered plans. Do to the expense of such in
depth/detailed work, we would only start the consultant team working on this if SCE is open to
consideration of such an infiltration basin.
I will be on vacation for the next couple of weeks. Please continue this dialogue with
Geraldine and Andy in my absence.
Thank you and appreciate your assistance. Best wishes for the upcoming Holidays and New
Year.
Thanks,
Ted
3
From: Geraldine Trivedi <Geraldine.Trivedi@redondo.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 9:35 AM
To: Ted Semaan <Ted.Semaan@redondo.org>
Cc: Andrew Winje <Andrew.Winje@redondo.org>
Subject: RE: Inquiry on Potential Use of SCE R/W ‐ Catalina/Herondo/N Francisca ‐ City of Redondo Beach
Ted,
Please see the following information that at be submitted to SCE’s Real Properties Department.
To comply with water quality laws and permit regulations, the Beach Cities Watershed Group (Torrance, Redondo,
Manhattan, Hermosa and the County Flood Control District) were required to develop and implement an Enhanced
Watershed Management Plan, which includes infrastructure projects throughout the watershed to improve water
quality at each of the beach outfalls. Each city in the watershed group is implementing projects in their jurisdiction to
address the runoff associated with this storm drain. However, a final project is needed close to the end of the storm
drain before runoff reaches the ocean.
The Herondo Storm Drain outfall is the largest storm drain in the South Bay Beach Cities and typically receives an “F”
grade during rain events on the Heal the Bay Beach Report Card due to high bacteria levels, which can make beachgoers
sick and results in beach closures.
The Hermosa Beach Greenbelt Project will divert water from the Herondo Drain to an infiltration system placed
underground similar to existing water, storm drain, and sewer infrastructure. This project will treat stormwater that
currently goes directly to the ocean through the Herondo Drain via the street and storm drain network. During storm
events, the infiltration project will divert stormwater from the Herondo drain into a pre‐treatment system that removes
trash and pollutants prior to water entering the infiltration gallery to percolate back into the ground. The pre‐treatment
system is cleaned following storms to remove pollutants. Infiltration projects have already been installed under Pier
Avenue and along the Strand south of the Pier to address stormwater runoff. Examples:
City of Santa Monica Urban Runoff Projects
Santa Monica Los Amigos Park Stormwater Demonstration Project
LA County Department of Public Works Stormwater Capture Projects
City of Los Angeles Garvanza Park Rainwater Capture Project
The project proposed for the SCE property has not been specified, however, attached are preliminary designs that were
developed for the Hermosa Beach Greenbelt Project adjacent the SCE site. A project at the SCE site would be similarly
sized. The construction is expected to take approximately 12 months for all options currently being investigated.
If you would like to read more background information about the proposed project, plans documenting the need to
improve our beach water quality, or watch the meetings that have been held to date, please visit Hermosa Beach’s
webpage at: http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=938
Thanks,
Geraldine
Alondra Park Multi-Benefit Stormwater Capture Project
o Project Scope
The Project will divert urban and stormwater runoff into underground storage with
options to 1) treat and reuse onsite for irrigation, 2) treat and release, or 3) release for
sanitary sewer treatment. The project will also include above ground landscaping,
low-impact-development features, and educational signage.
o Project Benefits
The Project will improve the quality of our rivers and ocean, increase local water
supply, and provide educational and outreach opportunities.
o Project Location
o Alondra Park (3850 W Manhattan Beach Boulevard, Lawndale)
o Major Intersection: Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Prairie Avenue
o Cost Estimate
o Total Project Cost (preliminary): $37M to $56M
o Volume Captured (preliminary): 34 – 56 Acre-Feet
o Potential Partners: El Segundo, Hawthorne, Lawndale, Manhattan Beach, and
Redondo Beach
o Tentative Milestone Schedule
o Complete Project Concept Report – Spring 2019
o Complete Design Plans – Late 2020
o Begin Construction – Mid 2021
o Complete Construction – Early 2022
Site Layout
General Vicinity Map
Alondra Park
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Friday, March 22, 2019 10:51:05 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Jeff Arey submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I oppose the disruption to our recreation, transportation, cable, telephone, internet,
water, and gas services that will be incurred with the installation of this South Bay Septic Tank
on Valley Street between Herondo Street and 2nd Street. I oppose the hydrological, geological,
and atmospheric degradation of my property by implementing such an intrusive project within 30
yards of my property. The installation of such a septic tank would be more appropriately located
at other less densely populated sites. For instance, it would be more appropriate for such a
septic tank be installed under the uninhabitable high-voltage easement in the non-residential
area south of 190th Street and east of Francisca Avenue. Damages suffered by Beachside
Condominiums during the installation of the Herondo Street Low Flow Storm Water Diversion
project and the following legal ordeal in obtaining a settlement with the contractors has taught
our condominium a painfully valuable lesson. The City of Hermosa Beach will be held
responsible for losses and damages suffered by residences resulting from locating this harmfully
intrusive project between Herondo St and 2nd Street.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 12:52:17 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Brian Witten submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: The vast majority of Hermosa Beach citizens are against water infiltration in the
greenbelt, particularly against doing an infiltration project at the end of the greenbelt where not
even a road separates 75 families and their homes from the construction. At last call within the
city council meeting, all citizens south of Pier were firmly against doing the water infiltration
project in the greenbelt location. If the city council presses forward with an infiltration project at
that location, they are clearly doing so against the wishes of the majority of citizens of Hermosa
Beach.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 4:41:00 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Maritza Alvarado submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: We would not be in this predicament if the city employees had not VOLUNTEERED
our Greenbelt for this monster infiltration project and if the city would have notified us, the
residents, several years ago when this happened. We would not have become collateral damage
if the environmental analyst would have done her due diligence and not let us become the lead
agency, in her words, by “default.” We would not be in this predicament if the city employees
would have done the proper studies concerning liquefaction, the water table and the impact on
the adjacent homes 10-15 feet away from this project, which, by the way, is what the city is
calling an “oversight." There are many more failures that could be added to this list, but the
bottom line is that the city has failed to put its residents first. Even Redondo Beach doesn’t want
this project on Francisca Avenue (not even a residential street) because of concerns about
potential soil contamination! The honorable thing for the City Council to do is to initiate a
dissolution of the MOU. I hope you will make the right decision this time. Respectfully.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 5:02:21 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Debbie Sanowski submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: The Greenbelt is a Fatally Flawed Site for an Infiltration Treatment Plant. The City
Council cannot go forward with this location without imposing a significant personal and property
risk of damage on the surrounding residents. A. The Water Table is too High for an Underground
Infiltration Project. The design to infiltrate 2,400,000 gallons of water directly into the Greenbelt
during every storm event, is inherently defective. With groundwater elevations range between 30
feet to as high as 10 feet below ground level, it doesn’t take a genius to realize that the water is
to darn high for this project to work as promised. The factual basis of this is detailed by Moorings
resident and engineer Alex Reizmanks multiple letters previously submitted to Council. In order
to comply with legal regulations given the water table calculations, the bottom of the entire
infiltration structure would have to be no more than 5 feet below ground. This is a physical
impossibility if the plant is to be buried underground. There is a reason large infiltration projects
of this magnitude are not built near the beach, you simply cannot successfully infiltrate into a
high water table. B. Homes and Structures are at Risk of due to Soil Subsidence & Liquefaction
Hazards Another fatal defect of the Greenbelt site is the liquefaction and soil subsidence risks to
the surrounding homes, underground basements and parking structures. These too are detailed
in a second letter drafted by Mr. Reizman to this City Council. When Tetra Tech was asked by
Mr. Reizman at the May 10, 2018 meet up about the risks of subsidence and liquefaction, Tetra
Tech assured him that the infiltration plant would be built to withstand such risks. When a few
participants responded, well that’s nice for the treatment plant, but what about our homes
existing right on top of and next to the structure? Tetra Tech responded that they would be fine.
When questioned as to how he knew that the homes would be fine, the employee conceded that
there was no study or analysis of impact on surrounding structures completed nor was one
planned under the terms of their current contract with the City. Who wouldn’t be upset at such a
lack of concern for the surrounding homeowners and their property? C. Zoning Laws. The
Greenbelt is zoned OS-1, Restricted Open Space. When I asked Councilman Massey (on
Facebook) about the inherent conflict of an industrial sized water treatment plant being built on
the Greenbelt, a park zoned open space, Mr. Massey responded that since the project was
going underground, zoning laws do not apply. I’m no zoning or land use expert but I’m not
entirely convinced that we can rely on this legal conclusion. As the HB City Attorney discussed in
his excellent legal analysis on Greenbelt building restrictions, “the physical improvements
permitted on the Greenbelt are limited by Sec 17.32.030 to the improvements stated therein.”12
The only underground items enumerated in the Code as permissible for the Greenbelt are:
irrigation improvements, erosion control and anti-seawater intrusion wells. All three items are
expressly listed in the HB zoning Code as viable improvements as they are “stated therein”.
Underground stormwater infiltration plants are not included on the approved list. Simply put, if it’s
not on the list, it can’t be built and stormwater infiltration plants are most definitely not on the list.
If, as Mr. Massey stated, zoning laws don’t apply because the project is underground, why do the
zoning laws, as detailed by the City Attorney, discuss what is and what is not permissible to be
built under the ground of the Greenbelt? It appears that there is a legal argument to be made
that this infiltration project is a zoning, if not other, legal violation. (see Jenkins & Hogin,
Memorandum to HB City Council, “Improvements on the Greenbelt” February 22, 2018) We
implore the HB City Council to do its duty and protect the interests of the HB residents. If
previous Councils or staff made expensive mistakes, do not foist the burden on the residents
living on the greenbelt to pay the price. Regards, Debbie Sanowski 3rd Street, Hermosa Beach
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 5:36:06 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Cameron Murg submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Too large for this small community - we should do our portion, not Redondo’s as
well!!!
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 5:40:15 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Lauren Kovnat submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I live on the green belt. I am appalled at the plans for this project.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 5:45:11 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Paul Repetti submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Against
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 6:21:44 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Arcadia Keane submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Worst idea ever Put on 190th, plain and simple. Figure it out.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 6:34:29 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
a lorentzen submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: worst idea ever. actually do what you were elected to do and listen to the people you
work for !
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 6:35:37 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Brian Hilgers submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: This is a terrible plan against the residences and city of Hermosa Beach! i am so
disappointed/upset to say the least! Just because the largest waste water drain is close to the
Greenbelt, which is dumping sludge from as far away as So. Bay Galleria-Artisea Blvd.,
Torrance, Redondo Beach DO NOT DUMP THIS PROBLEM ON HERMOSA BEACH. Destroy
Greenbelt/South park. PLEASE do what is right, none of us want pollution in the OCEAN, find a
solution with Redondo Beach! It appears this has been ignored with only a false impression you
are trying to find other locations. A year as gone by and now it is no further, and no true effort to
resolve. You represent HB not the other cities..correct? Brian
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 6:54:53 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Myra Telac submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I oppose the placement of the infiltration project on our lovely greenbelt. Clearly no
thought has been given to the residents of this small community.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 6:59:44 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Judith Mango submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: There is a plethora of scientific evidence that speaks loudly to the inappropriateness
of the Greenbelt location for this infiltration project. Stop wasting precious time and do what
Redondo Beach has proposed: Prepare a letter dissolving the MOU, forfeit the grant and let
each individual city take care of their proportionate share of the runoff. In addition, the current
design calls for electric pumps to be installed above ground, which Justin Massey acknowledged
at the October 9th City Council meeting is in violation of the zoning laws for the Greenbelt as well
as South Park. THIS IS THE ONLY SOLUTION.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 7:35:40 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Lorie Armendariz submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I want a clean ocean.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 7:56:24 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Thomas Dvorak submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Oppose
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 8:04:16 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Rachel Lozano submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Opposed
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 8:28:54 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Trent Larson submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Oppose the location of the Green Belt Hermosa Beach, and or South Park Hermosa
Beach. The infiltration project would seem a natural fit for the Redondo Beach AES property.
Wet lands / park lands are part of the planned mixed use for the 51 acres and, the underground
pool could be built first and then the park around it. Stuffing the lightening bolt shaped cement
pond with holes into our green belt is like trying to put a 10 lbs.of potatoes into a 5 pound bag.
Everyone wants a cleaner Ocean, so residents will not oppose the project as long as it's not on
very scarce, to extremely rare Hermosa Beach public lands.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 8:54:17 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Brad Horne submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: No one is saying no infiltration. We are saying NO to the Greenbelt. There are
several other places that would be much much better. Herondo street. Under the sand in front of
Herondo. The Hermosa city council did this behind our backs and did everything possible to
keep the citizens out of it because they are greedy and knew we wouldn’t stand for it. They know
what they did. And they should be ashamed. And the fact that Hermosa is losing that 3 million
dollar grant is the fault of city council. Also, has there been an audit to see where every penny of
that grant is? I would be curious to know if it ended up in places it shouldn’t have
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 9:34:27 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Matt Rohrer submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: This is not right for Hermosa!
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 10:34:36 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Carol Andrykowski submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: The project is not appropriate for the Greenbelt or South Park. It belongs in an
industrial area or at the very least not near any homes or play areas. The city should not rush
into making a decision, just because of the possibility of losing the grant. ALL options must be
thoroughly reviewed which includes, possible smaller projects and/or having more discussions
with other cities and having them take on some of the burden.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 11:10:52 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Carol Herschelman submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: City Council has been presented with a compelling amount of information as to the
technical, legal and engineering problems of constructing this project on the greenbelt. Everyone
wants clean water. Our vehement opposition is to the location, not to the project. It must be easy
for Council to want to go ahead with the green belt since none of the members live in the
affected properties. Please, I'm begging you, please move the location, I'm in tears as I'm about
to watch our life savings literally disappear along with the value and safety of our home.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 12:11:22 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Laura WItten submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: WE ALL WANT A CLEANER OCEAN, BUT AT WHAT COST?? When last we left
our City Council Members, they were going to go back and talk to Redondo and try to partner to
find a more appropriate spot on the other side of Herondo where there are not as many homes
within 500 feet of the proposed project. I fear this strategy was a ploy to run the clock and say
"we don't have time to make a different choice or we'll owe people money." Deadlines and/or
owing money was not an issue when it came to oil drilling in Hermosa. While the outcome here is
more palatable, A clean ocean is important, but we have to remember the cost to the residents
as well. Putting the fecal matter under the Greenbelt with machinery that can break and harm
wildlife, people, and homes is not appropriate. This a burden for all 4 cities to bear, but there are
hundreds of us living near the Greenbelt who shouldn't be asked to bear the brunt of it with the
possibility of broken homes and lower quality of life.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 12:31:07 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
May Gordon submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Oppose the location. It really shouldn’t be located anywhere near residents’ homes.
It also should not be carved out of our Greenbelt...it has had enough pieces cut out of it to
accommodate parking on the Valley side of the street. The Greenbelt needs more trees not
fewer. We all want to help clean the oceans but this project needs more space and not be near
homes. Suggest Redondo Beach, perhaps Torrance?
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 8:08:45 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Eric Hollreiser submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: This is an assault on things we must hold precious now more than ever: Our
Environment, Our Community, Our Property Rights and Our Democracy. *Our environment*:
Yes, we all want clean oceans. This must be done while ensuring we do not damage other
important parts of our fragile seaside ecosystem. The current Greenbelt proposal (and others)
are demonstrably destructive and have not undergone the required level of environmental impact
study that should be expected/demanded by all in this 21st Century. *Our community*: The
current proposal disrupts the community in immediate, future and potentially permanent ways
through construction, noise, environmental and aesthetic damage which will reduce the quality of
life and sustainability of our beach community. *Our property rights*: We all understand the value
of the soil we live on in the South Bay. This destructive propopsal usurps our rights to defend the
value of the residential and recreational land we live and play upon. Moreover, the proposal
ignores less-invasive and disruptive sites where this necessary filtration could occur, including
commercial-zoned areas such as AES. *Our democracy*: The shameful way in which members
of the Hermosa Beach City Council and staff acted (and didn't act) undermines our political
system and threatens the role of representative government. The passive indifference of
Redondo and Manhattan Beach politicians is also shameful. The Beach Cities should be united
in upholding a lifestyle and ecosystem that benefits us all. We will remember this each and every
Election Day. Voters must reward Council members who stand up for their constituency and
must punish the cowardly politicians who hide their actions, point fingers and cower behind self-
interested corporations and their self-serving studies. I urge all South Bay residents, property
owners and environmentalists to rise in support of the above values and in opposition of this mis-
guided and poorly executed proposal.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 9:53:00 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Susan Moore submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I OPPOSE this project for the many reasons my neighbors have most eloquently
outlined in previous comments. It is not appropriate for a small town where it would be placed so
close to people’s homes. Clean ocean, absolutely, but not at so high a cost to our community.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 11:30:02 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Anthony Fitzgerald submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I strongly oppose this project. Further I will vote against any council member who
votes for it as will the five members of my family. What's wrong with putting on it the power
station land. It already has retention ponds & is closer to the drain outlet.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 11:35:12 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Dianne Doherty submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Strongly oppose.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 12:24:58 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Randy Maxwell submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Please do not ruin my slice of heaven. There's no reason that this can't be placed at
the AES plant as they convert that new development. That would make this project painless for
all. They've already committed a large portion of the 46 acres to park lane. If not, this needs to
move to the other side of PCH, where the water table is deeper. I can't believe that Torrance and
Redondo, with much of more land, cannot come up with a site. Why is it left to the small and only
green belt and park lanes we have in S. Hermosa. We're already going to have to put up with the
major pollution when they teardown the AES plant. Enough is enough....please leave our
community's green areas alone and force the larger cities with many times the watershed to find
an area. The Underground power lines shouldn't be an issue anymore because AES is destined
to be gone soon.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 1:06:06 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Patrick Fitzgerald submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Strongly Opposed
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 1:56:44 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Kelly Moonan submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: THIS CANNOT HAPPEN TO OUR GREENBELT!!! They MUST listen to reason but
none of them live near the south end of the greenbelt. The greenbelt is 3 3/4 miles long and
there are only houses on 1/4 mile of it at the south end. THATS WHERE THEY WANT TO
DESTROY THE GREENBELT AND ALL THE OLD GROWTH TREES!!! This project will take
over 2 years to complete and is in these people's FRONT YARDS AND WILL DESTROY ONE
OF THE NICEST PARTS OF THE GREENBELT!!! STOP THIS TRAVESTY!!!
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 1:56:52 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Natasha Gunn submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: As residents of the mooring townhomes, our front door opens directly on to the
green belt. Our daughter is due in 3 weeks, her nursery that we just spent months putting
together backs up onto the green belt. The noise, and the amount of dust that our little one, and
all homes along the green belt will have to endure for months is extremely unsettling.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 2:03:54 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Kyle Uno submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Highly OPPOSED to the greenbelt project. This is not the correct site, other options
such as the strand would be far less impactful to the community and residents. This project has
been disgraceful from the start with the lack of transparency. Now that it’s down to the wire, do
not force this upon the community and make it a very bad situation because of fines and lack of
ingenuity on the cities part to find the best solution possible.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 2:58:03 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Brian Waldman submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Again we find ourselves having to defend our neighborhood, health and home
values from bad deals made my our "leaders". Please do the right thing and make our
community peaceful for all residents.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 3:10:31 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Joanna Holtmeier submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I am totally against this Greenbelt project. Joanna Holtmeier
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 3:11:47 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Ellen Epstein submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: As a homeowner along the Greenbelt I oppose this project for many of the same
reasons noted by others on this page. I urge the City Council to disregard the secretive, short-cut
approach it has been taking and embark upon a more open and respectful approach to this very
real infiltration challenge by listening to the affected communities and taking the time for
considering more fact-based approaches to reaching a solution. The short term “benefit” of
potentially avoiding uncertain future fines by approving this bad proposal are surely offset by the
certain costs of legal challenges that this inadequate and likely illegal process will bring. This is a
destructive and inappropriate proposal and must be rejected.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 3:58:16 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Amy Fitzgerald submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Strongly opposed. Bad idea & remember the Oil Drilling & impact that had on council
members who supported it. The same will happen on this issue.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 4:30:43 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Ron Taylor submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: March, 24, 2019 Re: REPORT 19-0191 Proposed Greenbelt Infiltration Project Dear
Hermosa City Council Members: While we certainly and wholeheartedly understand the reasons
for the proposed Greenbelt Infiltration Project and support such action. However we do not
support and must disagree with the irresponsible action to locate such an invasive project in the
heart of our local community. The impact of this project would be detrimental, both during
construction and operation to the quality of life and health of the surrounding residents. A study
was undertaken to determine a site, yet the site itself was obviously not properly evaluated for its
suitability and close proximity to neighboring residents and their properties. It seems the tables
have turned, as the site’s suitability does not seem to be the major concern of the city, but rather
it appears to be financial—as penalties and fines are the focus and the reasons…not the impacts
and problems for those in the area surrounding the site. The problems will be ongoing for the
residents of the proposed project’s surrounding neighborhood. Can penalties be used as
justification by the city for their action? Excuses are always unacceptable behavior. Excuses set
a bad example for everyone, because an excuse, if that becomes our focus, is a way of not
taking responsibility. We don’t accept excuses when our children give us a reason why they
didn’t do the right thing. Do we accept or excuse the City now for actions that are not based on
what is good for whole? Poor planning only stands to hurt others. And basic good judgement and
foresight was not carried through in looking at all of the impacts of this project, but that does not
mean we can’t come to our senses and do what is right at any moment. Don’t let an excuse color
your behavior or your own personal integrity. We all need to be responsible for our actions,
because they affect others. Please do NOT approve the proposed Greenbelt Infiltration Project,
but rather adopt Staff recommended Option 3 - Dissolve the MOU and determine another project
location. Respectfully, Ron and Barbara Taylor 114 Monterey Blvd. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 6:37:21 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Laurie Peterson submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: OPPOSE!!
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 6:39:04 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Beth Coren submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Strongly oppose this project - terrible for the neighborhood!
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 6:48:18 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Ron Taylor submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Strongly support a clean ocean; Strongly OPPOSE this project's proposed
alternative locations - Greenbelt and South Park.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 7:54:41 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Allen Pangaro submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: This project is inappropriate ANYWHERE in Hermosa! I urge HB residents to read
Carla McCauley's letter to City Council from Oct 8th as a refresher that outlines the key issues
and what we should demand of our council.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 8:05:48 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Toni C submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Strongly oppose the Greenbelt and South Park locations. It is time to dissolve the
MOU.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 8:19:07 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Barbara Pushman-Kaber submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Why would you do this to your residents who absolutely elected you to the Hermosa
Beach City Council? I ask you to stand on the greenbelt at the proposed site and just look to the
east at our homes. Seriously just stand there and imagine what you are asking of us and our
densely populated neighborhood. These are our homes, this is OUR neighborhood and our
LIVES!!!!!!! Can you honestly and truthfully say you all would support this disastrous location if
you and your families lived here like we do? I could make myself available ANYTIME to meet
you on the greenbelt. After and only after you look to the east at our homes, the proximity of this
proposed "project" and put yourself(s) in our shoes. I would ask you to look me straight in the
eye and tell me that we have absolutely nothing to worry about and we the Hermosa Beach City
Council think that this is the perfect location for this project. This size/scope infiltration project
does belong in Hermosa Beach period.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 8:35:03 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Tracy Kaber submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Strongly oppose this project in Hermosa Beach. ----- Please note there was a typo in
the last sentence of my wife's comment below (Barbara Kaber) Should read "This size/scope
infiltration project does "NOT" belong in Hermosa Beach.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 10:52:24 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Xavier Haase submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: We have WASTED our time fighting this project because the City of Hermosa Beach
DID NOT do its due diligence at the OUTSET of the project, nor was there sufficient NOTICE
and TRANSPARENCY about the project in years past. Those of us who have taken up the fight
against placing this project on the Greenbelt or in South Park or ANYWHERE in Hermosa Beach
have regular, daytime jobs, and we are not getting PAID to research, write, discuss, and speak
about this issue. I, as a board member of the Mooring Townhome HOA, do not receive a salary
for my work as a board member. But EVERY ONE OF YOU UP HERE, and others not present
who work for the city ALL receive salaries. It does not seem equitable that the people who are
fighting this project are NOT being remunerated, while the very people that should be
representing the INTERESTS of the people of this community ARE being paid salaries for their
work, and are being paid handsomely - far more than many of us who are fighting to save our
public parklands from destruction. This situation borders on the absurd on a veritable ALICE IN
WONDERLAND scale. It just does not make sense, and yet, we have to be told by nameless
and UNELECTED bureaucrats who think they know BETTER than the rest of us community
members that the south end of the “Greenbelt Infiltration Project is the highest priority project
identified in the Beach Cities EWMP.” If this project was the “HIGHEST PRIORITY PROJECT,”
then why weren’t the people living ADJACENT to the project notified in a TIMELY manner?
Where is the TRANSPARENCY? Where is the concern for the people DIRECTLY AFFECTED
by this project not notified sooner — years sooner? This whole debacle is the biggest OUTRAGE
that the citizens of this community have EVER had to endure. And we have had to endure this
OUTRAGE for MONTHS AND MONTHS now. And WHY? Because you all DID NOT do your
homework on this project, nor did you do your due diligence. WE, the citizens of THIS
community, have had to do your due diligence for you — and on OUR DIME AND OUR TIME.
We are done with this proposal. We DEMAND that you REJECT this proposal and START
OVER FROM SCRATCH. It is the LEAST you can do for the citizens of this community after the
missteps you have all made. I repeat, it’s the LEAST you can do.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Sunday, March 24, 2019 11:13:07 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Maria Haase submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Not only the Hermosa Beach Staff, but the Hermosa Beach residents demand to: "
Initiate a dissolution or an amendment of the MOU and negotiate a suitable substitute or revised
MOU and project with the City’s partners, relinquish the Grant and forfeit the grant funding".
Once again, we want this project to be realized, but NOT in Hermosa Beach! Even the City
Manager Staff indicated in the February 4th letter: "On February 4, 2019, staff met with staff from
Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach, and Torrance to discuss how to proceed expeditiously to
retain the grant funding and achieve the permit requirements. At this meeting, the Manhattan
Beach and Torrance Public Works Directors and Redondo Beach Assistant City Manager
expressed that if the original memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the project cannot be
accomplished in Hermosa Beach, they would like the Hermosa Beach City Council to prepare a
letter dissolving the MOU and forfeiting the grant because they are NOT confident that Hermosa
Beach can site a project." The Hermosa Beach City Council needs to support the residents! We
have been fighting to keep this project out of our city for one year!!!
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 8:30:16 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Katie Lee submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Pick just a street not a green area
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 8:55:20 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Dean Stehlik submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: This project is a disaster waiting to happen and needs to be reconsidered for a
different location. It is time to do what is right and just for the community of Hermosa Beach, and
not make a decision based purely on economics or worse ignorance. Please do the right thing
here and stop this project in it's tracks - not just for the current Hermosa Beach residents but for
future generations.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 9:16:26 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Alex Reizman submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: We all share the goal of cleaner oceans. However, the solution must be
implemented reasonably, equitably, and most importantly safely. There is a reason why large
scale infiltration projects are not sited so close to the ocean: The high groundwater levels simply
do not leave room to infiltrate. Council Members please challenge the City Staff to provide you of
a single example of similar sized, similar design, similarly ocean proximity sited infiltration project
anywhere in California. A single large scale Infiltration project; one that is required to take in over
7 acre-feet of water, is not feasible in Hermosa Beach. Smaller, shallower projects – and ones
that are consistent with the Hermosa Beach contribution to the Storm-water outflow should be
pursued.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 10:05:00 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
heather gandy submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: it is time to dissolve the MOU (watershed agreement among Redondo, Torrance,
Manhattan, and Hermosa allowing all the neighboring cities water to be filtered in the land
beneath our homes.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 10:06:05 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Mike Ball submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: It's past time to dissolve the MOU Mike Ball
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 10:19:00 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Barbara Sabo submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Dear HB City Council, Once again, I speak on behalf of the residents and owners of
Beachside Condominiums, at the corner of Valley Drive and Herondo Street. We are adamantly
opposed to the massive Greenbelt water infiltration project that remains at the top of the list of
priorities for City Council. The simple fact that this project was planned for a specially designated
area---the Greenbelt---which is mere feet away from dozens of homes, is a travesty. We well
understand the need to preserve the ocean and our beaches; but, channeling all the neighboring
cities' run-off through such a heavily built area will quite literally swamp our South Hermosa
neighborhood in any rainy season. We will not tolerate any threat to our property and right to a
peaceful existence. We strongly recommend that the City move immediately to dissolve the
MOU and leave each partner city to solve their own water filtration issues. Thank you. Barbara
Sabo, Beachside HOA Secretary FY 2019-20
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 10:26:48 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Mike Williams submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Strongly oppose.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 10:59:49 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Shanda Pearson submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Strongly oppose. Dissolve the MOU.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 11:05:37 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Alison Gray submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: This project should not proceed on the Greenbelt and so close to homes and parks.
There are more suitable options and sites for the size of this project.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 12:50:56 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Carla McCauley submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Please see the attached correspondence to council opposing the development of a
massive infiltration project in our city either on the Greenbelt or at South Park. The only
responsible course of action is to dissolve the MOU for the reasons stated.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 1:03:46 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Chris Dean submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Far better options across the street. The project is unneeded, dangerous to
underlying soil stability and previous projects the same as and similar to this near dense
residential housing have been resounding failures.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 1:31:04 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Claudia Berman submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Where's the FAQ. Still missing. This is a complicated project. We need the FAQ to
started and kept up to date.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 2:42:41 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Kathleen Thomas submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I completely oppose this project. I live on Valley and my living room, as well as
bedrooms, are on Valley directly across from the site. The noise and pollution from the project
would be horrendous. My parents who are 96 and 90 live with me. This would be awful for them
and their health. This is not a project for a densely occupied area. There are properties all along
this stretch of the greenbelt. Who in their right mind thinks this project belongs in a densely
populated residential neighborhood. I don't see anyone on the council who wants this huge
project in their front yard so why do you believe it should be in mmine? None of these objections
even consider how much the affected residents will lose in the value of their property. Is the City
prepared for a massive lawsuit to recover the value we homeowners will lose? I'm guessing my
property will drop 25-30% in valuer. I speak as a REALTOR with 40 years of experience in the
Beach Cities. We have had to contend with the AES facility for years.. We are finally possibly
getting rid of the plant and all of the stuff that goes with it and you want to put this massive
project across the street? This truly makes no sense to do this when so many residents will be
affected. I can't imagine what could have possessed the Council to even consider this project in
this location. The noise, pollution, and all the other related items this project will produce are not
compatible with residential living. When Redondo decided to redo Herondo the noise, trucks,
digging and dirt were awful and that was for just a few weeks. You are talking years of work,
noise, pollution and heavy trucks and machinery day in and day out. It was a dumb idea and it is
still a dumb idea. Let Redondo deal with it. they cause a far larger percent of the problem than
Hermosa does. If the City buys the land offered by the new owners of the AES plant ( which they
plan to do according to Mayor Bill Brand) .. They will make it a park and you could easily put in
the system you need under the park. There would be no disruption to the land as it must be
cleared anyway. The Council needs to be responsive to the residents of the area not to some
bureaucratic entity!
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 3:01:50 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Special Meeting(Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting -7:00 P.M.)
Michael Simonson submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Special Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00
P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I am an non-resident owner at 447 Herondo Street. it is time to dissolve the MOU
(watershed agreement among Redondo, Torrance, Manhattan, and Hermosa allowing all the
neighboring cities water to be filtered in the land beneath our homes).
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 5:46:49 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Laurie Cartwright submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I am strongly opposed to the Greenbelt Infiltration Project as currently designed and
I respectfully submit that we dissolve the MOU allowing Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, and
Torrance to filter water beneath our homes. The greenbelt is not the place for such a project and
our little city shouldn't be the filtering spot for three large cities. The vacant lot across Herondo
(between Catalina and Francisca) or the property (across PCH) where the car lot was would be
much better choices. They are in nearby proximity to the greenbelt and putting the infiltration
project in either place would enhance the area as opposed to destroying the greenbelt.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 7:20:58 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
danielle battut submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I am for cleaning the ocean of course. But not at the unfair expense of the green belt
residents. The South Bay Cities should all be involved in this effort not just Hermosa Beach. The
vacant lot just south of Herondo St seems the ideal place for such a project.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 7:39:43 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Claire Murphy submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Please do not disturb the beautiful park that many, many children and dogs play in
daily.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 7:50:28 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Max Riley submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Unfortunately, this community seems to be a massive, angry echo chamber of hate
towards the project. I wish we could have a civilized discussion in which the actual merits and
disadvantages of the project could be discussed.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 10:13:15 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Ken Hartley submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Its pretty obvious this community doesn't want this project. Especially at the
greenbelt.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Monday, March 25, 2019 11:29:53 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Greg Pearl submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I opposed putting the filtration project underneath the greenbelt between Herondo
and Second Street because it would remove the 40-50 year old trees there. Doing a longer,
narrower project underneath the greenbelt between Second Street and Eighth Street makes
more sense because it could spare all the greenbelt trees and it minimizes the risk of damage to
home foundation during construction or due to liquification later. Doing this project in middle of
the South Park also makes the most sense since it also spares the trees and may be farthest
from any home foundations. In any case, there is a risk of liquification caused by this project and
the city should insure itself for the value of all adjacent properties until this risk is better
understood.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 1:00:46 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Heidi Fernandez submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Hermosa Beach Councilmembers: the Hermosa Beach Greenbelt and South Park
are both unsuitable locations for Stormwater Infiltration Facilities of any size. Hermosa Beach
residents Alex Reizman, Debbie Sanowski and Carla McAuley have each done extensive and
exhaustive research over the last 12 months. I stand with each of them, and I urge each of you
to pass a motion to dissolve the current MOU. The community is now highly engaged and there
is a different path forward to achieving compliance. Thank you.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 1:09:39 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Robert Coleman submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I oppose the green belt infiltration project. Dissolve the current MOU. Thank you,
Robert
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 7:02:37 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Kern Herschelman submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I love our neighboring city of Redondo, and when you have friends, its best to give
them bad news immediately. Because of our lack of open space and high-density housing in
South Hermosa, we can only do our fair share of the infiltration, which equates to a project about
10% the size currently before Hermosa Council. Council please vote to dissolve the MOU so
Redondo can immediately begin to negotiate one of the large open spaces south of Herondo
Street or up 190th street. We can also hope that when Redondo sites their project, they will
consider including Hermosa’s 10%, and we will obviously pay them our portion.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 7:36:23 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Traci Horowitz submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Dear City Council, Clean water matters. Our homes matter. Our community matters.
The city is up against a deadline. You have until April 1st to convince the state resources control
board that you should be able to retain the $3M grant. But choosing the Greenbelt as the project
site to satisfy a deadline for the grant money should not be to the citizens’ detriment. We have
only had three meetings where city council was able to discuss this project and learn all you can.
Was that enough? I don’t think so. I don’t think staff has provided enough information, or studies,
regarding the feasibility of the Greenbelt (or South Park for that matter) as a location. This
deadline doesn’t require that you make a decision that goes against the interests of over 750
residents. There is a way out. Dissolve the MOU. I am in favor of dissolving the MOU and
allowing each city to clean its share of the water. This makes sense. It might cost a little more
upfront. But the savings in the long run will be so worth it. You will clean the water. You will save
our environment on so many levels. You will save our homes. Thank you, Traci Horowitz
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 8:17:43 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Curtis Snow submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I oppose this project and believe it is time to dissolve the MOU (watershed
agreement among Redondo, Torrance, Manhattan, and Hermosa allowing all the neighboring
cities water to be filtered in the land beneath our homes
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 8:51:55 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Andrea Pulcini submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I oppose the infiltration project. Hermosa Beach City Council should vote to end the
MOU with its neighboring cities.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 8:53:19 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
John Lauba submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Let’s do something good for the ocean; but don’t forget about the people. We need
common sense; put the Herondo Storm Drain underground filtration project where there is
minimal impact on people and buildings. Anyone that believes that the Greenbelt is the proper
location for this project should walk the perimeter of the proposed project and actually look at the
proximity to the front doors and windows of your neighbors. Imagine living there during years of
construction; and not knowing what the long term effects will be. Then look south across
Herondo at the acres of available land including the soon to be gone power plant.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 8:56:23 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Charlene Wong submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: For the many reasons already expressed by those opposing the project
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:06:09 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Mary Young submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Dear City Council - I am a 25+ year homeowner/resident of Hermosa Beach with a
home that is almost on the greenbelt area in question. I vehemently oppose locating the project
on our iconic greenbelt and near so many homes. Clean water is critical, but so is protecting our
unique and beautiful community. I understand the deadline of April 1st, but selecting the
Greenbelt as the project site to satisfy a deadline is not in the interest of the citizens you serve.
There has not been sufficient time or research to make this detrimental decision. Dissolve the
MOU and let each city clean its share of the water. This is the only way to protect both our water
and our homes, and to safeguard one of our city treasures.... the beloved greenbelt. Mary A
Young 555 4th St, HB
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:09:43 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
J P submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: The Council serves at the behest of the community. The community has spoken.
Time to put to rest an idea that was not brought to the community in a way that was above board
and that does not serve the interest of the locals that are affected. The cause is not the issue,
the decision making process and the location is.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:10:10 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Holly Heines submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I oppose this project. It is time to dissolve the MOU (watershed agreement among
Redondo, Torrance, Manhattan, and Hermosa allowing all the neighboring cities water to be
filtered in the land beneath our homes. I am blown away that we are even having this
conversation and that our own city council is not fighting for us residents. This is such a common
sense issue and makes me wonder why our council members seem to have lost all common
sense? Protect our tiny bit of land, protect our residents. Period.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:11:52 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Gina DeRosa submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I am opposed to his project at both proposed locations, the Greenbelt and South
Park. There is simply not enough room to hold a project of this magnitude. No follow-up studies
have been done to ascertain true water table levels at either location despite detailed input from
local engineers. Everyone wants a clean ocean but you must take a responsible course of action
to achieve that outcome. Please dissolve the MOU.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:13:58 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Janet Beaver submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I oppose the greenbelt project
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:23:47 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Grant Leeds submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Dear City Council, I strongly oppose the greenbelt water infiltration project. I’m a
long term resident living a couple blocks from this area and walk my dog and 21 month old
daughter along the chip trail on a daily basis. We also go to the park regularly and don’t want to
see the area over run with construction. Please don’t approve this large scale project that will
bring toxins directly into our neighborhood where our children live and play. Thanks for your time
and consideration! Regards, Grant
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:23:57 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Susie Carrington submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Please stop this green belt project.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:23:59 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
kathy kramer submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I strongly oppose this brown belt project.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:26:17 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Tara Stabile submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Greenbelt and South Park are not the locations for this kind of project. I strongly
oppose.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:26:27 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Molly Leeds submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: This greenbelt infiltration project would significantly damage the benefits of living in
south hermosa including my children’s safety. Hermosa recently spent a good amount of money
re-doing south part which has become a haven of enjoyment for children and families in the
area. It’s a heavily used park because of the investment made and location. By putting this
project directly behind the park it will prevent us as a family from using the park. There are so
many other areas to consider for this project and right next to a park where the future of our
society plays is not the place. We choose to live in south hermosa for the community and
ammeneties even though we don’t have a yard. This park is our one green haven in the area. If
you take away our ability to use the park because of construction and smell we will be taking our
tax paying dollars to another community so that we can find a safe piece of grass/park for our
children to play at. Why waste the investment made in this piece of land when there are many
more options for this constructions at different points in the Greenbelt. If hermosa is not
protecting the children of our community and prioritizing them then I fear this lovely family
community will change over to a town of transient renters who are looking for the best value
because rental prices will drop versus a place to have a long term home.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:29:41 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Lynda Tee submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I am a home owner in Hermosa Beach and I strongly oppose this project!
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:31:27 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Mark Burton submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Dear Hermosa Beach City Council: I recall a time in the past where each one of you
were inspired to get involved to stop oil drilling in HB. That involvement eventually led to you
running for City Council. And, you are a top notch City Council, in part, because your roots are
with the residents and what is in their best interests. It must seem like deja vu when you see
residents who are similarly inspired to stop the big dig. Please find an alternative location for this
important project. My sense is RB has more available area for this important project, especially
with NRG vacating in the future. With kind regards, Mark Burton
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:40:05 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Ryan Simpson submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: As a home owner in Hermosa Beach, I strongly oppose this project. Overall, it is a
negative detractor on the overall neighborhood in addition to negative environmental impacts.
Please do the right thing and turn this project down.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:56:38 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Jessic Dean submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I strongly oppose this project.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 10:08:17 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Gail Rose submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I think that the only appropriate spot for this project is under the power lines along
Heredondo. Nothing else can be built there and the runoff from Torrance and Redondo should
be directed there. Hermosa has no real land or open areas that can be used without
compromising the population. I am not pleased with the thought of all those toxins being dropped
into the water table of Hermosa. Also, if there is a lot of rain and the pumps fail we are saddled
with a horrific problem. Who will pay for the ongoing maintenance and repair of this system
(Torrance, Redondo, Manhattan Beach?? or all costs of maintenance on Hermosa.?
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 10:22:07 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Jessie Michelsen submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Please keep our beautiful park safe for our kids!!! I strongly oppose this project!
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 10:26:39 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
David Makharadze submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Seems like a terrible location for a project like this.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 10:29:44 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Stephanie Orloski submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I strongly oppose the location
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 11:01:32 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
SHARON AREY submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: oppose. dissolve MOU agreement. Too many problems and legal issues.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 11:03:17 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Emi Kobayashi submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: We strongly oppose to the greenbelt project.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 11:27:27 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Ms Sberna submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: We strongly appose this project in our community!
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 11:30:03 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Scott Goldenberg submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: The infiltration project location on the Hermosa Greenbelt is dangerously close to
many residences. The location was not properly vetted, and the potential damage to health,
usability of the greenbelt and nearby property values is too great a risk. The city has not done
due diligence here. We are your neighbors and we are taxpayers. We deserve a safe and
sensible resolution - not just the most expedient one. If this project was going to be outside your
front door - as it would be mine - I’m sure you would understand why we strongly oppose the
greenbelt location. It’s lose-lose-lose for all involved. Thank you, respectfully, Scott Goldenberg.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 11:32:51 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Racheal Wallis submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: We strongly oppose Hermosa Beach using the greenbelt for the infiltration project as
proposed to date. We believe the City council has been negligent and taken on too much
responsibility for the project and has made a mistake in not taking into consideration the full
impact of this project in Hermosa Beach most importantly on the residents and the homes
immediately surrounding the area. This was acknowledged in the October meeting by city
council members that the lack of assessment on the residents was an oversight and the
overwhelming response from the residents is that Hermosa Beach is too density populated to
have a project of this size and that by proceeding Hermosa Beach will open themselves up to
lawsuits should they proceed. The city council members now need to take the mature response
to accept their mistake, cut their losses and hand back proportionate responsibility to the
surrounding beach cities by dissolving the current MOU. At the very least the greenbelt in
between 2nd and Herodondo Street needs to be removed from the proposed sites as this would
have the most damage to local residents and homes if it is to be used for this purpose. While I
agree we all need to take responsibility to improve the water quality in the ocean I do not believe
we need to damage the health and wellbeing of the most important resources in Hermosa - the
residents, families and children who live here. As the city council members you have a duty to
protect and take the responsibly for the health and wellbeing of this community in Hermosa.
Regards Racheal Wallis
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 11:37:57 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Sharon Kondo submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: This is a horrible idea. We all want cleaner oceans, but polluting the ground in our
neighborhoods and underneath where our children play is not an acceptable solution (neither
South Park nor Greenbelt). It's hard to believe it's even being considered, especially when
there's an empty lot just yards away. It also doesn't make sense for Hermosa to have to bear the
brunt of the potential environmental and safety issues when our city contributes a fraction of the
water runoff that will be filtered. For the sake of our families, our children's children and the
future of our city, please, please find a better solution.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 11:41:17 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Claudia Berman submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: f) REPORT 19-0185 PROJECT STATUS REPORT AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 2019 (Acting
Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez)
eComment: I just got home from my usual strand walk. Now the terra cotta is gone. I updated my
Go Hermosa ticket. Still curious why the change in direction? It's not mentioned in the status
report.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 11:44:18 AM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Monica Haase submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I very much oppose the Stormwater Infiltration Project in Hermosa Beach. There are
dozens of other locations where this project could be located. Hermosa Beach is a tiny,
residential community, with barely enough room for parks and walking space. There is absolutely
no room for this project in Hermosa Beach, especially so close to my home.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 12:09:14 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
D F submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I live one block from the Greenbelt and am opposed to this location and South Park
for the infiltration project. Both locations would compromise the health and safety of our
residential neighborhood. The greenbelt is a beautiful part of Hermosa Beach. Please do not
destroy it with this project. It is your duty to find an alternate site that is not in the center of a
residential neighborhood.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 12:48:02 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Sheila Ennis submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I oppose!
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 12:50:14 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Jamie Immel submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: We don’t want this
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 12:50:42 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Polly Schneider submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: City Council: I have read every one of the statements here in opposition to the
proposed infiltration system. I strongly agree with them! My husband and I owned two homes
and lived and raised our kids in each of them for a total of fifty years. I have always been just a
few steps from the south end of the greenbelt. After the railroad was "abandoned" many of the
residents worked very hard to preserve the area for an open space. There were developers
around who wanted to develop the whoIe stretch of land into condos and commercial use. The
argument was we have the beach, what do we need more open space far? I hope I'm not the
only one here who remembers the other battles we as citizens have had with different city
councils to protect the south end of town. When my husband and I first moved here there were
actually vacant lots, the Ace boat Yard, 190th stopped at PCH and became a dirt road. The first
city council meeting we went to was when the city was trying to stop people from having
chickens in their back yards! A few of us actually went dressed like chickens! (not me) From then
on there were many problems more concerns mostly about density in this little town. The
redevelopment fight was the big one. It went on for over a year. Our house was in, what the
council designated as a "blighted area" We, and our neighbors were all considered blighted! It's
a great way to make new friends! There were many meetings One had so many people that it
was moved from the council chambers to the auditorium at the community center. I think that
was still the JR. HI then.There was still only standing room. It lasted until five in the morning! The
people in the "north end" decided to join us because we had helped them in an oil fight so long
ago that I can't even remember it! We finally won after we held enough fund raisers to hire an
attorney and threaten to recall the council. It took lots of walking the neighborhoods to get
enough signatures on the They had appointed themselves as the redevelopment agency. Finally
they said if we vote against it will you please not recall us! So we won! There were a couple of
condo projects that had too many units. Finally one of them wanted to squeeze 15 units on a
very small lot. They changed the plan from 15 units to 13 units and put a swimming pool in the
extra space! I guess we won that one. And then the NO ON Oil fight which I'm sure you all
remember. By that time I decided that I was too old to keep fighting--it was time for the
youngsters to step up---but here I am again! All of this happened in the south end of town for
some mysterious reason. Maybe people keep forgetting that we are fighters and every time they
come up with a ridiculous new idea for us we will stand up and fight again! And this seems
another of those times.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 12:55:22 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Laurie Rodgers submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: The truth is a bad decision was made. Please do not add insult to injury. Step up,
admit it was a bad call and do something to fix it. Certainly the city does not have to move this
forward .i would hope Our council will hear us , and represent us. We are to small a community
to bring that into our neighborhood. There is still areas around Herondo that Redondo could
utilize before they force it on us. It is too impactful on the green belt. Shame on you all if you
can’t find a better solution. Think before you act, please. We might as well have let the oil guys
in, at least there the land owners would have gotten something for the troubles. Listen to your
community. Thank you
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 1:04:34 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Patti G submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I am a resident who lives close to proposed project site, and I strongly oppose this
project and support dissolution of the MOU. The proposed locations for this project are
inappropriate due to the proximity to homes and the fact children play on top of them. We all
want cleaner oceans, but not at any cost. It’s tough to see any upside for the city in this project. I
urge the council to listen to the community’s input and choose to not compromise the health and
safety of its residents.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 1:06:41 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Marion Pearl submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Dear City Council, What I would like to bring up is the history of making fast
decisions by the HB City Council and then the HB residents have to rally up and fight it and also
pay for those hastily decisions. In the 1980tis, the then city council thought it was a good idea to
take off the ban of oil drilling and drill for oil in HB to have more money. It did got voted for and
then oil contracts got signed with stipulations that the residents got another vote on it, however
financially responsibility got already signed. By then all HB residents woke up to it and this oil
drilling was fought for over 20 years with a price tag of over 20 millions of fines and fees for
Hermosa’s residents! Now just about when the oil drilling got settled for this amount in 2016, the
then HB City Council thought it was a good idea to take on this hastily signing MOUs Greenbelt
infiltration project! Again we are here to fight it and who knows how much it will cost us!? For the
future we might want to think about, how to restrict the HB City Council to make those costly and
hastily signed mistakes!? That all residents get an informed notification in the mail when
something like this will be considered, before anything is signed and promised? We would of
saved us millions of $ and agony this way! We sure could need it for fixing roads and other
infrastructure, when I look at those electrical cables tangling above us, I have the impression
being in a third world country.. Thank you Marion P
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 1:35:59 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Bob Jones submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I do not live near either South Park or the southern greenbelt. My opposition is to the
disruption of construction and the inadvisability of placing the facility in close proximity to
residents' homes. This is as bad an idea as oil drilling in HB because of the extreme density of
our community.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 1:36:38 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Brad Ou submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Dear HB City Council, Thank you for listening to our concerns concerning the
infiltration project along the green belt. Please register my negative response in regards to athe
proposed sight next to the Mooring condo complex. I feel that it may negatively affect the
underlying ground stability and ultimate cause harm to our properties. Sincerely, Brad Ou
Resident of the Mooring condo complex at 501 Herondo St.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 1:41:45 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Victoria Kohlhepp submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: The greenbelt is a place for our kids to walk and feel safe. I oppose this project it will
affect our safety as well noise impact!!
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 1:43:14 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Nicole Ellison submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: As residents who live adjacent to the Greenbelt and 2nd Street, my family and I
strongly oppose the Greenbelt infiltration project. We support that the city of Hermosa Beach
should implement storm water capture projects that benefit the water quality of our beaches,
however these projects should be the appropriate scope for our city.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 1:53:28 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
rebecca Hilgers submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: This is terrible for Hermosa Beach destroying our community vs. seriously woking
with the communities that contribute 90%+ of the waste Rebecca
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 2:22:43 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
megan watumull submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Strongly oppose
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 2:28:23 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Melissa Singh submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Dear Counsel members, Please do not destroy the treasures that are South Park
and the Greenbelt and site this project elsewhere. As a South Hermosa resident, I walk this trail
and use this park daily. They are both in constant use by people of all ages. Please do not
destroy our children’s safe walk to school and places to play. Please site this project under
Herondo street or another location that will not destroy our neighborhood’s quality of life. Thank
you
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 3:07:19 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Rebecca Veltman submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: I oppose this project strongly---for all the reasons voiced at the October council
meeting by numerous citizens. Hermosa Beach's potential risk is many times greater than the
loss of grants accepted by the council originally. Ruining South Park to "correct" it only
compounds the error in judgment. It requires courage to admit the original acceptance was
wrong. Better to rescind the approval now, accept the fact that the whole project as originally
envisioned was based on poor research (or none), and proceed from there. Throwing more
money down a rat hole is an abuse of the power granted to council by the voters. Please show
you have the courage we voters thought you had. We can live with honesty. Can you?
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:noreply@granicusideas.com
To:Ann Yang
Subject:New eComment for City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 3:17:48 PM
SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Meeting (ClosedSession - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00P.M.)
Ravi Singh submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: City Council Meeting (Closed Session - 5:30 P.M. and Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.)
Item: a) REPORT 19-0191 GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
(Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris)
eComment: Unnecessary deadline for an unrealistic solution. Strongly oppose. Additional time
should be requested for further research that is not aimed at correcting one issue by creating
another issue.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com.
Unsubscribe from future mailings
From:peter@electpetertucker.com
To:City Clerk; Ann Yang
Cc:Suja Lowenthal
Subject:FW: 6 (a) MUNICIPAL MATTERS GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 6:24:23 AM
Sorry for the second e-mail the first e-mail did not read correctly
-----Original Message-----
From: peter@electpetertucker.com/spam <peter@electpetertucker.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 6:18 AM
To: 'cityclerk@hermosabch.org' <cityclerk@hermosabch.org>
Cc: 'Ann Yang' <anny@hermosabch.org>; suja@hermosabch.org
Subject: 6 (a) MUNICIPAL MATTERS GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
PLEASE PLACE MY COMENTS ON THE ADGENDA FOR ITEM 6(a) GREENBELT
INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS AND THE ATTACHED PHOTOS
Staff has placed Report 19-0191 on tonights Agenda (03/26,2019) with three
recommendations for the Council to consider. Proceed with the existing
Greenbelt location, proceed with a location at South Park or initiate a
dissolution or an amendment of the MOU with the Beach Cities EWMP partners.
Staff has now proposed to place the infiltration galleries at South Park as
an alternative to the Greenbelt location. Staff has indicated that there are
fewer impacts to the surrounding areas at the South Park location.
South Park will be a construction site for one year or more and there will
be real impacts to the surrounding areas.
Some of the impact will be the following:
*
Vibration for large earth moving equipment ,earth compacting machines and
large trucks delivering materials and general construction noise (sometime
very loud)
*
The site will require shoring. CAL/OSHA will require a permit (DOSH permit)
for excavations that are 5 feet and deeper. Tetra Tech photo of Bolivar Park
show a similar gallery with shoring.
*Excavating at this site or the greenbelt site will require a minimum of 190
10 wheelers (dump trucks) per acre foot which would be 2650 dump trucks for
a 15-foot excavation depth. There is no mention of a truck route for the
dump trucks or other trucks delivering items such as the large concrete
galleries
*
The site (South Park) needs to have further testing for geotechnical and
liquefaction susceptibility . Plan hermosa (General Plan) on page 189
mentions the Geologic and Seismic Hazards of both South Park and the
Greenbelt location at 2nd Street and Herondo Street
*
The diversion structures will still be constructed at Herondo Street with a
depth of 20 feet or more . This will require shoring per CAL/OSHA
*
The contractor will need a staging area for equipment and construction
materials . This might be place in the parking lot.
3/26/19 AGENDA, ITEM 6a - GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
SUPPLEMENTAL EMAIL AND ATTACHMENTS SUBMITTED BY PETER TUCKER TO THE
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE ON 3/26/19 AT 6:24 A.M.
The Council should look at the 1.6 miles of the Greenbelt to place a Low
Flow Infiltration System such as the Manhattan Beach system located at First
Street and Ardmore/Valley Drive. This Manhattan facility collects runoff
form 55.2 Tributary acres.
The area between 21st Street to Pier Ave and PCH to Ardmore is a Tributary
of 34 acres and between Pier Ave. to 8th Street and PCH to Ardmore is a
Tributary of 27 acres. Two Low Flow Infiltration Systems could be installed
in these locations the size of Manhattans This would eliminate the flooding
of the south bound lane of Ardmore causing cars to drive into the north
bound lane ,the water falls at the Community center sidewalk and wood chips
flowing into the ocean. (SEE PHOTOS) Please look at the safety of the
Hermosa residents driving along Ardmore during the wet seasons and with the
Low Flow Infiltration installation the runoff will not reach the ocean.
Everyone in Hermosa is for clean oceans but the two proposed locations for
the infiltration projects contain Geologic and Seismic Hazards.
Peter Tucker
Infiltration Project - City Council - 26 March 2019 - D. Grethen
City Council should not direct that Hermosa Beach withdraw from, or substantially alter,
the EWMP MOU and associated project plans without an evaluation of the associated
legal and financial risks to the city. I do not see any such evaluation in the staff report.
Nor is there any indication in the staff report of the magnitude, types, and costs of
projects that might be implemented locally if Hermosa Beach dissolves the MOU and
chooses to comply with water quality and discharge requirements on its own. It could
turn out that even the projects under this scenario would generate significant resident
concerns like we are seeing now, so it would be unfortunate to alter our plans at great
risk and cost, only to see similar concerns.
It is possible that our neighboring city partners in the EWMP may seek to recover
financial compensation from Hermosa Beach for their impacts from our refusal to site
the currently planned (or a substantially similar) project with our city. There may be
several mechanisms by which these impact occur, and we need to understand their
likelihood and consequences, as there may be scenarios that are financially calamitous
for Hermosa Beach if legal action is pursued.
The impacts to EWMP partners Redondo Beach, Torrance, and Manhattan Beach might
be viewed in terms of increased project costs to revised plans, as well as associated
delay costs. The increased project costs would fundamentally result from the
inefficiencies of a ‘stove-piped’ approach to meet program requirements within smaller
geographic areas, as opposed to the current EWMP approach taken at the watershed
level. There would be various delay costs associated with a late start to implement all
of these newly formulated project plans, but perhaps the greatest delay cost risk would
be failure to complete the projects in time to avoid fines for program noncompliance.
And then of course there is potential failure to succeed in future pursuits to recapture
lost grant funding, as well as loss of sunk costs such as design expenditures for
abandoned current plans.
We need to know what assurance there is that Hermosa Beach will not be deemed
legally responsible for our EWMP partner cities’ increased costs (and possibly fines) by
our failure to meet the commitments we have made in the MOU. I do not mean to be
overly alarmist here, but we must ask these types of questions. And unfortunately time
seems to be running out.
3/26/19 AGENDA, ITEM 6a - GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER SUBMITTED BY DAVID GRETHEN TO THE CITY MANAGER'S
OFFICE ON 3/26/19 AT 10:14 A.M.
Without such assurances, we should choose one of the proposed locally sited options.
South Park appears to be viable and less disruptive than the Greenbelt due to its
geography and relative residential proximity, though it may be somewhat more costly.
However, if we seek to pursue this alternative, we must be confident that we can show
the effectiveness of this project to ensure retention of our substantial grant funds, and
also believe that this approach will not perturb our neighbor city partners in the EWMP
to the point where substantial cost recovery is sought from Hermosa Beach.
David Grethen - Hermosa Beach Resident
Wt"""'la S,-
redondo
SEACH
Bill Brand
l,4ayor
March 26, 2019
IVlayor Stacey Armato
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Dear Ms. Armato;
The City of Redondo Beach received your letter dated March 13, 2019 requesting
authorization for Tetra Tech, lnc. to investigate the feasibility of North Francisca Avenue
in Redondo Beach as an alternative location for the Hermosa Greenbelt lnfiltration Project
(Project). As you know, the Project's location on the Greenbelt was identified in the
Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP), approved by the Council or Board
of each agency in the Beach Cities Watershed Management Group (Beach Cities) in late
spring of 2015 and approved by the Regional Board on April 18, 2016
The EWMP was developed in response to the requirements of the Los Angeles Regional
Board's 2012 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
requirements for agencies that operate storm drain systems in Los Angeles County and
adherence to the same is required to remain in compliance. The four Beach Cities,
Redondo Beach, Hermosa Beach, Torrance and Manhattan Beach started collaborating
in 2013 to develop the EWMP, and identify regionally beneficial projects that when built
would meet the new permit obligations. The City of Redondo Beach led the development
of the EWMP beginning in 2013 and with the concurrence of the other agencies, engaged
a consulting firm, Geosyntec, to help develop the technical portions of the Program. The
next phase of Permit compliance, the Coordinated lntegrated Monitoring Plan, is being
led by the City of Manhattan Beach on behalf of the Beach Cities.
The EWMP includes several regional projects that were agreed to by each participating
agency. The Project is the first of the regional projects and arguably the most important.
The Hermosa Beach City Council approved the Greenbelt lnfilkation Project Design MOU
on September 26,2017 and agreed to be the lead agency.
The Project is a critical component of the approved EWMP since it's the highest ranked
regional project that would achieve the greatest reduction in indicator bacterial levels at
the Herondo Drain Outfall in the Santa Monica Bay. This 9.2-foot x 11-foot reinforced
concrete box culvert (at Valley Drive) drains over 2,960 acres, our biggest shared
watershed, and the Project as planned is an excellent location to treat water from four
415 Diamond Street, P.0. BOx 270
Redondo Beach, C a lifo rn ta 90271-027 0
www.redondo.org
tel 310 372-1171
ext.2260
fax 310 374-2039
3/26/19 AGENDA, ITEM 6a - GREENBELT INFILTRATION PROJECT NEXT STEPS
SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER FROM REDONDO BEACH MAYOR BILL BRAND EMAILED TO HERMOSA BEACH
MAYOR STACEY ARMATO ON 3/26/19 AT 5:06 P.M.
Clty of Redondo Beach Response Letter
March 26, 2019
Page 2
Hermosa Beach became the lead agency for this Project because it is located in Hermosa
Beach. ln addition to the EWMP, Hermosa Beach's obligations for the project were
codified in the MOU which was approved by each of the Beach Cities governing bodies
in July 2017 and by your City Council on September 26,2017. Per the MOU, Hermosa
Beach accepted funding from each of the involved agencies, proportioned according to
their tributary drainage area, including $431,615 from Redondo Beach. So far, we
understand, $255,529 of this money ($129,809 of Redondo's $431,615) has been spent
for design of the project at the agreed upon greenbelt location.
The estimated cost to implement the Project is a hefty $7,336,1 80. For most of the Beach
Cities, this funding will come from our already burdened General Funds. Fortunately, the
Beach Cities Group worked together to receive a Proposition 1 Grant in the amount of
$3,099,400, which reduces, by nearly half, the General Fund money required for the
Project. An alternate project, especially one located outside of Hermosa Beach may not
meet the Project's bacteria reduction goals and may jeopardize the $3,099,400 in grant
funding.
For these reasons, the City of Redondo Beach is highly concerned that if the Greenbelt
lnfiltration Project is canceled or modified so late in the project's completion timeframe, it
may result in the dissolution of the MOU, a loss of the funds already spent on Project
design, and a relinquishment of the $3,099,400 grant. Such an action may jeopardize
each agency's compliance status with the Regional Board, and may require each agency
to invest additional funds to develop alternative projects to meet the reduction goals of
our MS4 Permits. ln addition, this action would include the uncertainty surrounding
requesting Regional Board approval of EWMP modifications and extended compliance
dates.
That said, the City of Redondo Beach is committed to working together with our EWMP
partners to complete projects that will help preserve and enhance the beneficial uses of
our receiving waterbodies and ensure compliance with our NPDES permit with the
following conditions:
1) lf the agencies in the Beach Cities Group collectively agree to support and fund,
or the City of Hermosa Beach solely funds, the exploration of North Francisca in
cities in the most economical, efficient, and effective way. ln other words, because of its
location near the outfall end of the pipe, this location does the most to achieve the
reductions in bacteria levels at the outfall at the least cumulative cost. Moving the project
upstream may not achieve the same reductions and certainly not with the same cost
efficiencies. Replacement projects that do not meet the prescribed reduction levels
according to the Permit compliance deadlines, and delays to this Project jeopardize the
Beach Cities compliance with the Permit and expose each agency to penalties associated
with non-compliance. Non-compliance risks potentlal fines from the Regional Board of
up to $50,000 per day for "knowing violations" of any of the provisions of the NPDES
Permit and Clean Water Act.
City of Redondo Beach Response Letter
March 26, 2019
Page 3
Redondo Beach as a potential alternative project site, the City of Redondo Beach
will provide the Right of Way permits needed to perform the study.
2) lf the exploration of North Francisca does not receive approval from the Beach
Cities EWMP Group or the City of Hermosa Beach does not agree to individually
and separately fund the study, the City of Redondo Beach will be forced to consider
other compliance options that may not include continued partnership with the City
of Hermosa Beach.
3) Additionally, the City of Redondo Beach would request that the City of Hermosa
Beach provide assurance that other alternative sites within Hermosa Beach also
be studied to possibly meet the EWMP group's infiltration targets as it is unknown
if North Francisca provides enough room to meet compliance requirements.
4) The City of Redondo Beach would also request that the City of Hermosa Beach
take the lead on working with the Regional Board to negotiate approval of a
modified EWMP and address the revised project descriptions, goals and
compliance dates.
lf the Hermosa Beach City Council decides to move forward with the investigation of North
Francisca as an alternative location with the above conditions, please contact Geraldine
Trivedi at Geraldine.Trivedi@redondo.orq or 3'1 0-318-0661 x2036 to coordinate the work
and obtain all necessary permits
Sincerely,
a "/'a %--
William Brand
Cc: Redondo Beach City Council
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
19-0200
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY PROVIDES UPDATE
ON MEETING WITH SENATOR SCOTT WIENER’S
LEGISLATIVE AIDE TO DISCUSS SENATE BILL 50
Attachments:
1.Senate Bill 50 Fact Sheet
2.SBCCOG Opposition Letter dated February 20, 2019
3.Link to Bill Text and Information
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
More HOMES Act of 2019 Fact Sheet – Updated 3.14.2019
SUMMARY
Senate Bill 50 allows for building housing near
existing job centers and public transportation, and
includes strong protections against displacement for
renters and vulnerable communities in those areas.
The bill is expected to help relieve the acute housing
shortage and affordability crisis in California’s cities.
It will also reduce climate pollution and improve
public health by greatly expanding access to
sustainable transportation options, like public
transportation, and by allowing people to live closer
to where they work.
BACKGROUND/EXISTING LAW
Existing law leaves most zoning and land use
decisions to local governments, and includes no
minimum density standards near state- and
federally-funded transit infrastructure. While state
land use standards in the Density Bonus Law and SB
375 establish general guidelines and principles, they
do not include adequate provisions for enforcement.
Due to the lack of adequate and enforceable statewide
standards, most California cities (with a few
noteworthy exceptions) are still operating from
outdated and highly restrictive zoning ordinances
that make it difficult or impossible to build multi-
family dwellings at any density. Duplexes, fourplexes,
and similar infill housing types near high-quality
transit are routinely banned due to neighborhood
objections and underlying single-family zoning.
Clearly, a significant component of solving
California’s housing crisis must include greatly
expanding access to transit services for workers at all
income levels, while addressing the well-documented
housing shortage. The status quo is jeopardizing
several of the State’s high-priority policy objectives:
On housing affordability: The California
Legislative Analyst’s Office has found that the
housing shortage in coastal cities is pushing a
growing share of Californians into poverty,
and forcing a large and growing cohort to
spend more than half their income on rent.
On climate change: The California Air
Resources Board has found that the state will
miss its climate targets unless Californians
reduce the amount they drive by 25 percent
by 2030. Absent a surge of new housing
development in livable, pedestrian-oriented
areas near public transit, such reductions in
vehicle miles travelled are impossible.
On equitable growth: According to the
California Department of Housing and
Community Development, “Today’s
population of 39 million is expected to grow
to 50 million by 2050. Without intervention,
much of the population increase can be
expected to occur further from job centers,
high-performing schools, and transit,
constraining opportunity for future
generations.”
PROBLEM
Economic and educational opportunities in California
are increasingly concentrated in urban areas, but
housing construction has not kept pace with demand
for access to these opportunities. Local governments
play the lead role in determining the location and
amount of housing in their jurisdictions, including
which developments will be located near high-quality
transit corridors. They also control, via housing
supply, reasonable access to schools, parks, libraries
and other vital services that improve community well-
being and ensure a vibrant economic future.
The dearth of new housing construction, particularly
in California’s highest-opportunity communities, has
compounded over the last several decades into a
shortage of 3.5 million homes, according to the
California Housing and Community Development
Department.
California’s workers and families feel the results of
this shortage in the form of exorbitant rents and the
highest home purchase prices in the nation. Excessive
competition for limited housing supply is also driving
a statewide epidemic of displacement, evictions, and
homelessness.
California’s failure to keep home building on pace
with job growth is directly responsible for longer
commutes and increased air pollution. Millions of
low- and middle-income Californians have multi-
hour commutes, as they seek affordable housing far
from areas with concentrated economic and
educational opportunities.
Senator Scott Wiener, 11th Senate District
SB 50 – More HOMES Act of 2019:
Housing, Opportunity, Mobility, Equity, Stability
More HOMES Act of 2019 Fact Sheet – Updated 3.14.2019
Statewide, California’s businesses have created 4.5
jobs for every new housing unit; according to the
Building Industry Association, the ideal ratio is 1.5
jobs per housing unit.
According to the Department of Housing and
Community Development:
“Land use policies and planning can help
encourage greater supply and affordability,
as well as influence the type and location of
housing. Thoughtful land use policies and
planning can translate into the ability for
families to access neighborhoods of
opportunity, with high-performing schools,
greater availability of jobs that afford entry to
the middle-class, and convenient access to
transit and services. Easy access to jobs and
amenities reduces a household’s daily
commute and other travel demands.
Encouraging new homes in already
developed areas and areas of opportunity not
only alleviates the housing crisis, but also
supports the State’s climate change and
equity goals.”
SOLUTION
While the housing shortage is chronic across most
California jurisdictions, there are several examples of
cities taking the lead on reforms that help alleviate the
crisis by encouraging infill housing near transit, job,
and educational opportunities. These include Los
Angeles, which authorized creation of the Transit
Oriented Communities (TOC) program in 2017. The
measure created powerful incentives for affordable
housing near Metro subway stops and bus services
through modifications to the zoning code; as projects
move closer to high-quality transit, they are required
to increase the amount of affordable housing.
Oakland’s experience also offers a positive vision for
future housing growth. In 2016, the city eliminated
minimum parking requirements, drastically reducing
the cost of new housing construction while
encouraging new developments on high-quality
transit corridors. The changes to the city’s zoning and
development standards have resulted in a mini-boom
of walkable, transit-oriented apartments near BART
and AC Transit bus stations, and within a short
distance from the city’s primary job locations.
Senate Bill 50 integrates lessons learned
from cities like Los Angeles and Oakland to
expand the benefits of affordable, transit-
rich and job-rich housing across the state.
The bill will give cities new tools to provide
relief to rent-burdened workers and families
while reversing the growing, and alarming,
trends of homelessness, displacement, and
migration out of California.
State Minimums, More Housing Choices:
The bill waives apartment bans near high-quality
transit and in job-rich areas to ensure that the
benefits of public investments in transportation are
broadly accessible to Californians of all incomes. The
bill also includes specific requirements to provide
low-income housing in new development to ensure
that market-rate construction is always coupled with
affordable units for the lowest income Californians.
SB 50 applies to sites that are either within ½ mile of
high-quality public transportation, or within a job-
rich, high-opportunity neighborhood. Under SB 50, a
local government will be allowed to approve higher-
density housing with no parking requirements,
provided the site is adjacent to transit, or reduced
parking requirements in areas close to jobs and high-
quality schools. Height limits for new housing with
close, walkable access to rail or connected transit will
be loosened to encourage mid-rise, apartment-style
housing construction. For example, in areas close to
rail or transit-connected ferry service, a local
government may allow buildings of up to 4-5 stories,
depending on the distance from transit.
Preservation of Local Control:
Under the legislation, all housing projects will still be
subject to environmental review (the California
Environmental Quality Act), and must follow existing
labor and employment standards for new
construction. Local development fees, community
engagement processes, and architectural design
review for each housing development will remain as-
is. Additionally:
Anti-demolition: A local government
retains existing authority to ban, prohibit, or
restrict demolition of existing housing,
consistent with the Housing Accountability
Act. At a minimum, a local government may
not issue demolition permits for housing
currently or recently occupied by renters.
Local affordable housing policy: If a
local government requires more affordable
housing than what is required in SB 50, that
policy will be honored in new developments.
Neighborhood height limits: A local
government retains authority to set or
maintain local height limits for new housing
in areas without easy access to rail transit.
Local initiatives to encourage TOD: If a
community has a successful, preexisting,
program to encourage apartments near
public transportation, such as the TOC
program in Los Angeles, then properties
eligible for that incentive will be ineligible for
this program.
More HOMES Act of 2019 Fact Sheet – Updated 3.14.2019
Key provisions for renters and sensitive
communities:
SB 50 includes the following provisions:
Tenant Protections: Establishes strict
tenant protections to ensure long-time
residents will not be displaced from their
communities, including a prohibition on
demolishing buildings currently or recently
occupied by renters.
Affordable Housing: Establishes a
requirement that every new housing
development larger than 20 units must
include a significant number of housing units
affordable to for low, very low, or extremely
low-income households, ensuring affordable
housing will be built for people of all income
levels. Each project must designate 15-25% of
the total units to low-income families, or
designate an equivalent amount for very low-
or extremely low-income families.
Sensitive Communities: Allows for
delayed implementation in sensitive
communities at risk of gentrification and
displacement, and grants five years for a
community-led planning process in these
neighborhoods.
Job-Rich Communities: Proposes a new
“job-rich housing project” designation to
ensure that high-opportunity communities
with easy access to jobs allow a broader range
of multifamily housing choices for people of
all income levels, even in the absence of high-
quality transit.
CO-AUTHORS
Sen. Anna Caballero (D-Salinas)
Sen. Ben Hueso (D-San Diego)
Sen. John Moorlach (R-Costa Mesa)
Sen. Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley)
Sen. Jeff Stone (R-Temecula)
Asm. Autumn Burke (D-Marina Del Rey)
Asm. Kansen Chu (D-San Jose)
Asm. Tyler Diep (R-Westminster)
Asm. Vince Fong (R-Bakersfield)
Asm. Ash Kalra (D-San Jose)
Asm. Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin)
Asm. Evan Low (D-Campbell)
Asm. Kevin McCarty (D-Sacramento)
Asm. Robert Rivas (D-Hollister)
Asm. Phil Ting (D-San Francisco)
Asm. Buffy Wicks (D-Oakland)
SPONSORS/SUPPORT
California Yimby (Co-Sponsor)
Non-Profit Housing (NPH)
Association of Northern California
(Co-Sponsor)
Abundant Housing Los Angeles
American Association of Retired Persons –
(AARP)
Bay Area Council
Bay Area Housing Advocacy Coalition
Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART)
Black American Political Association of
California (BAPAC) – Sacramento Chapter
California Apartment Association
California Asian Pacific Islander Chamber of
Commerce
California Association of Realtors
California Foundation of Independent
Living Centers
California League of Conservation Voters
(CLCV)
California Public Interest Research Group
(CalPIRG)
California Renters Legal Advocacy and
Education Fund (CaRLA)
City and County of San Francisco, Mayor
London Breed
City of Campbell, Councilmember Jeffrey R.
Cristina
City of El Cerrito, Mayor Gabe Quinto
City of Emeryville Councilmember Dianne
Martinez
City of Emeryville, Councilmember John
Bauters
City of Fairfield, Vice Mayor Chuck Timm
City of Foster City, Councilmember Herb
Perez
City of Half Moon Bay, Mayor Deborah
Penrose
City of Healdsburg, Mayor David Hagele
City of Los Gatos, Councilmember Rob
Rennie
City of Milpitas, Vice Mayor Marsha Grilli
City of Oakland, Mayor Libby Schaaf
City of Palo Alto, Councilmember Adrian
Fine
City of Pinole, Councilmember Vincent
Salimi
City of Sacramento, Mayor Darrell Steinberg
City of San Jose, Mayor Sam Liccardo
City of South San Francisco, Mayor Pradeep
Gupta
City of Stockton, Mayor Michael Tubbs
City of Woodland, Mayor Enrique
Fernandez
Council of Infill Builders
East Bay for Everyone
Environment California
Grow The Richmond
Habitat for Humanity
More HOMES Act of 2019 Fact Sheet – Updated 3.14.2019
Los Angeles Business Council
Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce
Mission YIMBY
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
Northern Neighbors
People for Housing - Orange County Yimby
Progress Noe Valley
San Francisco Housing Action Coalition
San Francisco Planning and Urban Research
(SPUR)
Santa Cruz Yimby
Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Silicon Valley Leadership Group
South Bay Yimby
State Building and Construction Trades
Council, AFL-CIO
Supervisor David Canepa, San Mateo County
Supervisor Don Horsley, San Mateo County
Supervisor Jim Spering, Solano County
Supervisor Michael Kelley, Imperial County
Supervisor Miguel Villapudua, San Joaquin
County
Up For Growth, California
Valley Industry Commerce Association
YIMBY Action
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Annie Fryman, Legislative Aide
Email: ann.fryman@sen.ca.gov
Phone: (916) 651-4011
L O C A L G O V E R N M E N T S I N A C T I O N
Carson El Segundo Gardena Hawthorne Hermosa Beach Inglewood Lawndale Lomita
Manhattan Beach Palos Verdes Estates Rancho Palos Verdes Redondo Beach Rolling Hills
Rolling Hills Estates Torrance Los Angeles District #15 Los Angeles County
20285 S. Western Ave., Suite 100
Torrance, CA 90501
(310) 371-7222
sbccog@southbaycities.org
www.southbaycities.org
February 20, 2019
The Honorable Scott Wiener, Chair
Senate Housing Committee
State Capitol Building, Room 2209
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 50 (Wiener): Planning and zoning: housing development: equitable communities incentive –
Notice of OPPOSITION
Dear Senator Wiener:
On behalf of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) I am writing to express our opposition
to SB 50 (Wiener). As a joint-powers authority of 16 cities and unincorporated areas in Los Angeles County,
this bill significantly undermines local authority and control for our members.
Although the state housing crisis is real and must be addressed, it must be done in conjunction with the state’s
other critical goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. It is also important to note that a single state-wide
strategy for producing “sustainable housing” will not work in every city or region. Enclosed in this letter is
a White Paper written by the SBCCOG. This White Paper not only includes the reasons we cannot support
SB 50, but also includes suggestions that we think would work better. This White Paper is written as a
supplement to the original paper written in response to SB 827 (Weiner) during the previous legislative
session, which is available online at: http://southbaycities.org/news/resolving-housing-carbon-dilemma-
state-policy-role-local-government.
We encourage you to work with local governments and the League of California Cities to develop a dynamic
policy that is adaptable to all regions of this diverse state.
Should you have any questions, please contact SBCCOG Executive Director, Jacki Bacharach, at (310) 371-
7222.
Sincerely,
Britt Huff, SBCCOG Chair
Councilmember, City of Rolling Hills Estates
Enclosure (1)
CC: Members, Senate Housing Committee
South Bay Senators: Allen, Bradford, and Mitchell
Jeff Kiernan, League of California Cities Regional Public Affairs Manager (via email)
1
Resolving the Housing-Carbon Dilemma in State Policy:
The Role of Local Government
White Paper -- Supplement
February 2019
The South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) distributed its White Paper
(December 2018) on policies to achieve zero emission housing in suburban cities. It
was written in response to 2018’s proposed housing legislation, SB 827. This
supplement responds to its 2019 successor, SB 50.
The key issues remain:
• While the state has a housing crisis, it must be addressed in conjunction with
another critical state goal, reducing GHG emissions
• A single strategy for producing “sustainable housing” will not fit every context.
• Transit oriented development in particular will not effectively limit GHG emissions
generated by residents’ mobility choices in suburban contexts.
• Local governments are best positioned to determine politically acceptable siting and
density of new housing in order to minimize GHG emissions (criteria pollutants and
congestion) while meeting housing development goals.
• Whether as redevelopment or infill, the State should support and provide financial
assistance to a strategy anchored by zero emission multi-modal mobility.
Essentially, SB 50 lacks the complexity to produce housing that can and will also
address the urgency of the climate crisis. Meeting the target of 3.5 million new homes
by 2025 must be done in a way that minimizes the carbon emissions generated by the
mobility choices of the new residents. That will require a number of supporting policies
that will expand zero emission mobility and access options. The State should play the
key role by setting targets for maximum allowable GHG emissions by residents of new
housing. Specifying density adjacent to transit will neither produce enough housing nor
minimize carbon outcomes.
Consider:
State bears some of the responsibility for housing shortages. SB 50 continues to assign
responsibility for the housing shortage solely to cities which are characterized as
NIMBYs with “outdated and highly restrictive zoning.” It would be productive for the
legislature to look critically at existing State policies as being equally responsible, and a
good place to start when developing new legislation. Sacramento has for years
promoted a single housing-sustainability strategy -- residential density adjacent to public
transit. Local voters organizing in opposition are not mindless NIMBYs; they
understand that increased density, whether adjacent to transit or job centers, will
damage quality of life. Claims to the contrary are not believable from the perspective of
experience on the ground. As an editorial on SB 50 in the local South Bay newspaper
concluded: “Some other solution must be sought, because it accomplishes little to begin
solving one serious problem while making other problems worse.” (Thomas Elias, Daily
Breeze, February 8, 2019) Cities need the policy tools, technical assistance and the
2
authority to determine the most politically feasible strategy for effectively developing
zero emission, zero pollutant and zero congestion housing.
SB 50 continues to ignore the special needs of suburban cities
SB 50 draws lessons from examples of reforms “that help alleviate the crisis by
encouraging infill housing near transit, job, and educational opportunities.” (More
HOMES Act of 2019 Fact Sheet, 12/3/2018). However, the examples listed were from
Oakland (TOD) and Los Angeles (Transit Oriented Communities program); both at the
center of their respective metropolitan areas. This reinforces the concern that state
housing policies work most effectively in the relatively few large urban places, while the
majority suburban places are ignored. In suburbs, zero emission mobility will be
produced by building housing in a way that complements multi-modal electric vehicles,
rather than transit service. The infrastructure, residential densities and the supporting
policies are radically different between the two candidate strategies for building housing
while minimizing greenhouse gas emissions
The SBCCOG’s 16 year-long Research and Demonstration program, one of the most
advanced in the state, created and tested components of a strategy for developing
housing that will eventually lead to zero emission mobility by the residents. This is the
“Sustainable Neighborhoods Strategy” – adding housing by redeveloping obsolete
retail/commercial properties in densities compatible with the existing neighborhood. This
strategy will produce “complete” neighborhoods with high walking mode shares
complemented by short range, slow speed zero emission vehicles for the 70% of trips
that today are shorter than 3 miles and 90% shorter than 10 miles. In other words, 90%
of household trips can be zero emission with the right combination of housing
development, commercial redevelopment, electric mobility and virtual presence.
SB 50 continues to oppose housing development outside of the already crowded
metropolitan core despite the potential for more affordable units slightly further away.
This amounts to the State characterizing an actual opportunity as a problem while
treating the actual problem as an opportunity.
The problem as opportunity: The coastal counties and cities are the main target of SB
50; yet those are the most difficult places to build affordable housing – on expensive
land in congested areas where there are no vacant lots and where construction requires
demolition. That is redevelopment, not infill as referred to SB 50. That distinction
matters. The following quote from the legislative summary refers to “already developed
areas” where what is important is whether there is vacant land (which can be infilled) or
not (requiring redevelopment).
- “Encouraging new homes in already developed areas and areas of oppo rtunity not
only alleviates the housing crisis, but also supports the State’s climate change and
equity goals.”
Most troubling, the redevelopment strategy may not work as assumed. New research
was just published in Urban Affairs Review (“Upzoning Chicago: Impacts of a Zoning
Reform on Property Values and Housing Construction,” Yonah Freemark, January,
2019) which found that upzoning (changing local land use regulations to allow for
greater density, as would be required by SB 50) did not increase housing supply over
3
the 5 year study period (2013-2018); and housing prices rose on the parcels that were
upzoned, so housing became less affordable, not more. In summary, the research
found that in the short term (within 5 years) local level impacts of upzoning are higher
property prices but no additional new housing construction. (https://www.msn.com/en-
us/money/realestate/does-upzoning-boost-the-housing-supply-and-lower-prices-maybe-
not/ar-BBT05sL?ocid=spartandhp)
In addition to expensive land and constrained development possibilities, built-out cities
have carrying capacity issues (solid waste landfills that have reached capacity; old,
limited capacity sewage systems requiring replacement before accommodating
additional demand; limited open space and parkland).
The opportunity as problem: Developing some housing in the suburbs outside of the
metropolitan core would produce more affordable homes that can be built as “zero-
emission” and at a much faster pace. With a target of 3.5 million new homes before
2025, the rate of construction is very relevant. This approach is often characterized as
adding to “sprawl,” but would be the opposite – fix what is considered sprawl by using
infill housing and commercial development to create complete suburban neighborhoods.
SB 50 considers those locations undesirable because of the ‘access’ problem created
by living outside the metropolitan core.
- Without intervention (represented by SB 50), much of the population increase can be
expected to occur further from job centers, high -performing schools, and transit,
constraining opportunity for future generations. More HOMES Act of 2019 Fact
Sheet (12/3/2018)
It is much easier and cost-effective to solve the “access” problem created by infill
development outside of the metropolitan core than it is to solve the affordability-
problem from redevelopment of expensive land in already congested areas.
It is time to add a new approach to housing development policy while preserving local
control. Success will require state and local governments to cooperate on means to
meet the goal rather than the State mandating the means .
“The notion that increasing housing supply will magically fix our problems is one
of those things that is simply too good to be true. Zoning liberalization is at best
one part of the answer. America’s housing and urban crises are thorny problems
that we can only come to grips with using a broad mix of strategies and
solutions.” (Richard Florida, CITYLAB, January 30, 2019)
In other words, building housing in a 21st Century sustainability framework requires
robust policy with a legislative package (not a single Bill) that coordinates housing
construction with zero emission mobility, virtual access to key destinations, and
supporting infrastructure. A simple density-transit approach with some parking
concessions will neither produce enough new housing nor limit the carbon outcomes
from whatever housing gets built.
4
ATTACHMENT
Mix of Strategies Suggested By Findings from SBCCOG’s R & D Program:
Priority: In order to respond to both crises – housing and environment -- the State
should set carbon emissions standards for new housing developments. RHNA sets
targets for the volume of affordable housing that should be developed in each city, but
the State is silent on the allowable GHG emissions from those developments. As
mentioned above, the Sustainable Neighborhoods Strategy holds the promise of 90% of
household trips being zero emission. The State should set the target; cities should
adopt housing regulations that would meet both the housing volume and carbon
emissions targets; developers should submit a carbon emissions component with their
housing plans describing how the target will be met: and cities should review those
plans as part of their project approval process.
Require Sustainable Land Use/Development
• Fund MPOs to inventory vacant land suitable for infill development in each
jurisdiction, and to develop “complete neighborhood” models for cities with infill
opportunities.
• Ensure State planning guidelines include policy and methods to guide infill
development in order to create complete neighborhoods.
• Adopt policy tools to help cities redevelop retail strips to housing. This may require
help with assembling parcels for example. Develop analytical tools for cities to
identify the best redevelopment targets along commercial arterials. SCAG is
currently conducting such an analysis for the SBCCOG with findings expected
before May 1, 2019.
• Offer incentives to commercial developers for building to accommodate a high
density of individual businesses; and for incorporating shared work spaces.
• Offer incentives to building owners and tenants for providing charging and parking
for EVs, especially zero emission local use vehicles (LUVs).
Decentralize Destinations to Outside the Metropolitan Core
• Develop incentives to attract businesses planning expansion in the metropolitan
core to decentralize to those sub-regions and cities with vacant land. Likewise,
incentivize new business formation in those same places.
• Incentivize medical and educational institutions to advance telemedicine and
distance education programs for distribution throughout the region, reducing the
absolute need for physical access.
• Fund MPOs to develop regional telework programs. Offer incentives to employers
with telework programs, especially those that, for example, provide work sites within
3 miles of home for 50% of its workforce at least 2 days per week.
5
Develop Infrastructure for Sustainability
• Ensure that every city has affordable access to fiber networks that deliver 1 to 10
gig/sec service. A combination of grants and low interest loans will help sub-
regions throughout the state replicate the SBCCOG’s fiber ring backbone network
currently in development. The fiber ring is essential to the many work, medical and
educational applications that make virtual presence a feasible complement to
physical access adding the trip not taken to the transportation strategy.
• Revise the Caltrans Complete Streets Planning Guide to include “local travel
networks” that provide the infrastructure for the safe use by the evolving market of
short range, slow speed vehicles. Today that guide addresses only bike,
pedestrians and bus transit.
Support Zero Emission Mobility Options
• Direct the California Air Resources Board to:
o Develop a Clean Vehicle Rebate Program that provides robust incentives for
apartment building owners and condominium HOAs to purchase neighborhood
electric vehicles as a building amenity for sharing among residents; and for
community-based organizations in Disadvantaged Communities with ride
sharing and/or vehicle sharing programs.
o Offer rebates of up to 30% off the purchase prices for all approved zero
emission, slow speed, short range vehicles and devices for eligible consumers.
• Develop a program that will incentivize public transit agencies to develop or partner
with micro-mobility services and other innovations for shared rides that approximate
door-to-door, on-demand services.
• Require that new multi-unit housing construction include electric charging with
parking for a high volume of short range, slow speed vehicles.
Send comments to ws@siembab.com,
South Bay Cities Council of Governments Research Director
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
19-0201
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES
AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
19-0202
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of March 26, 2019
TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the tentative future agenda items.
Attachments:
Tentative Future Agenda
City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/22/2019Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
March 21, 2019
Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of
of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 26, 2019
TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3, 2019 @ 6:00 PM
NO STUDY SESSION DUE TO SPRING BREAK
APRIL 9, 2019 @ 6:00 PM INITIAL
DATE CLOSED SESSION
APRIL 9, 2019 @ 7:00 PM
PRESENTATIONS
RECOGNIZING NATIONAL VOLUNTEER WEEK AND CITY VOLUNTEERS
BEACH CITIES TRANSIT PROCLAMATION TO PROMOTE
“STAND UP FOR TRANSPORTATION” WITH THE THEME “GET ON BOARD”
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing
Check Registers Finance Director Ongoing
Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks,
Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of
March 5, 2019
Community Resources Manager Ongoing
Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-20 Proposed Project Lists-Adopted Resolution
submittals for the Local Streets and Roads Funding Program
Acting Public Works Director Annual
PUBLIC HEARINGS – 7:30 PM
Ordinance regulating Sidewalk Vending in compliance with Senate Bill 946 Acting Public Works Director Council Direction
Dec 11, 2018
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
Summer Concert Series 2019 Award of Contract Community Resources Manager Staff Request
Mar 21, 2019
Recommend award of Construction Contract for 8th Street Improvement
Project
Acting Public Works Director Staff Request
Mar 17, 2019
North School Project Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Draft Scope of
Work
Environmental Analyst Staff Request
Mar 18, 2019
Update on South Bay Guidelines for a Shared Mobility (bikeshare and e -
scooters) Pilot Program
Environmental Analyst Council Direction
Aug 28, 2018
Purchase and installation of Pier Avenue Bus Stop Shelters & Furniture Environmental Analyst Staff Request
Aug 2018
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS – CITY COUNCIL
Updates from City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees and Standing Committee
Delegates/Alternates
Councilmembers Ongoing
OTHER MATTERS – CITY COUNCIL
Tentative Future Agenda City Manager Ongoing
2
APRIL 23, 2019 @ 6:00 PM INITIAL
DATE CLOSED SESSION: QUARTERLY LITIGATION UPDATE
APRIL 23, 2019 @ 7:00 PM
PRESENTATIONS
LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE SERVICES AND MCCORMICK AMBULANCE QUARTERLY UPDATE
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing
Check Registers Finance Director Ongoing
Revenue Report, Expenditure Report and CIP Report by Project Finance Director Ongoing
City Treasurer’s Report and Cash Balance Report City Treasurer Ongoing
Cancellation of Certain Checks City Treasurer Ongoing
Public Works Project Status Report Acting Public Works Director Ongoing
Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning
Commission meeting of April 16, 2019
Community Development Director Ongoing
Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Items Community Development Director Ongoing
CONSENT ORDINANCES
Second Reading of Ordinance regulating Sidewalk Vending in compliance
with Senate Bill 946
City Clerk Council Direction
Dec 11, 2018
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
Consider Athens Services Annual Rate Adjustment request for Solid Waste
and Street Sweeping Management Services pursuant to the Franchise
Agreement
Environmental Analyst Annual
Resolution amending fee schedule for sidewalk vending fees Finance Director Council Direction
Mar. 12, 2019
Role of Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission (EPAC) City Manager Council Direction
Nov. 13, 2018
Document Retention Policy City Clerk Staff Request
Nov. 28, 2018
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS – CITY COUNCIL
Updates from City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees and Standing Committee
Delegates/Alternates
Councilmembers Ongoing
OTHER MATTERS – CITY COUNCIL
Tentative Future Agenda City Manager Ongoing
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 24, 2019 @ 6:00 PM
FY 2019-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TUESDAY, APRIL 30, 2019 @ 6:00 PM
STUDY SESSION: BUDGET REVENUE STRATEGY
3
TENTATIVE - WEDNESDAY, MAY 1, 2019 @ 6:00 PM
TRI-AGENCY STUDY SESSION WITH BCHD AND HBCSD ON YOUTH HEALTH ISSUES
MAY 14, 2019 @ 6:00 PM INITIAL
DATE CLOSED SESSION
MAY 14, 2019 @ 7:00 PM
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing
Check Registers Finance Director Ongoing
Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks,
Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of
April 2, 2019
Community Resources Manager Ongoing
Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Emergency
Preparedness Advisory Commission meeting of March 4, 2019
Emergency Management
Coordinator
Ongoing
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
Consideration of the contract extension with Beach Cities Transit Community Development Director Staff Request
Feb. 19, 2019
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS – CITY COUNCIL
Updates from City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees and Standing Committee
Delegates/Alternates
Councilmembers Ongoing
OTHER MATTERS – CITY COUNCIL
Tentative Future Agenda City Manager Ongoing
WEDNESDAY, MAY 22, 2019 @ 6:00 PM
BUDGET WORKSHOP
MAY 28, 2019 @ 6:00 PM INITIAL
DATE CLOSED SESSION
MAY 28, 2019 @ 7:00 PM
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing
Check Registers Finance Director Ongoing
Revenue Report, Expenditure Report and CIP Report by Project Finance Director Ongoing
City Treasurer’s Report and Cash Balance Report City Treasurer Ongoing
Cancellation of Certain Checks City Treasurer Ongoing
Public Works Project Status Report Acting Public Works Director Ongoing
Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning
Commission meeting of May 21, 2019
Community Development Director Ongoing
Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Items Community Development Director Ongoing
Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works
Commission meeting of March 20, 2019.
Acting Public Works Director Ongoing
South Bay Workforce Investment Board Quarterly Summary City Manager Quarterly
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS – CITY COUNCIL
Updates from City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees and Standing Committee
Delegates/Alternates
Councilmembers Ongoing
OTHER MATTERS – CITY COUNCIL
Tentative Future Agenda City Manager Ongoing
4
PENDING STRATEGIC PLAN ITEMS INITIAL
COMPLETION
DATE
Update Personnel Policies Human Resources Manager
Beach Policy/Regulations (Continued from meeting of October 27, 2016) Community Resources Manager Sept-2016
Alternative Fuel Transportation Report Environmental Analyst Nov-2016
Encroachment Direction City Attorney Nov-2016
CCA Direction Environmental Analyst Dec-2016
Information Item – Phase 3 Parking Meter Purchase Acting Police Chief / Assistant to
the City Manager
Jul-2017
PENDING NEW ITEMS INITIAL
REQUEST
Initial Report on Options and Strategies for Installing a Permanent Carousel
or other Family Friendly Features at the Entry Point to Pier Plaza. In
Cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce, this would include a
Preliminary Cost Benefit Analysis and Implementation of the City Decision
Making Tool (supported by Duclos and Fangary)
Acting Public Works Director Other Matters
Tree ordinance with respect to tree removal Acting Public Works Director Staff Request
Consideration of re-establishing, on an as needed basis, both funding and
discretion for the director of Public Works to contract services to pump major
beach storm outfalls drains prior to anticipated major storm events (sup ported
by Duclos, Armato and Petty)
Acting Public Works Director Other Matters
Policy discussion regarding city responsibilities and expectations when
donations are made to city
Finance Director Council Direction
Consideration of a position letter on federal gun control legislation
(supported by Fangary, Armato and Massey)
Assistant to the City Manager Other Matters
Report on Phase II of Library Assessment including Location Alternatives Community Resources Manager Staff Request
Award of Contract for On-Call Traffic Engineering Services Acting Public Works Director Staff Request
Update on bicycle infrastructure implementation & Next Steps
Environmental Analyst Council Direction
Special Event Policy Update and Subcommittee Direction Community Resources Manager
Parking Lot D (Manhattan Ave and 14th Street) Final Designs Environmental Analyst Staff Request
Consideration of proposed changes to the city right of way and public
facilities in the area of the proposed North School Project
Environmental Analyst Staff Request
Consideration of direction to the Downtown Enhancement Subcommittee or
other subcommittee, to develop the following for city council approval: (1) an
ordinance to reduce and eliminate the sale and use of single use plastics in
hermosa beach; and (2) letters of support for legislative and congressional
efforts to achieve the same objective across California and nationwide
(supported by Massey, Duclos, Campbell and Armato)
Environmental Analyst Other Matters
Adoption of Athens Organic Rates Environmental Analyst Staff Request
Measure H Grant Acceptance Assistant to the City Manager Staff Request
Consent for use of “Lot B” for construction staging area for Pier/Strand
project
Community Development Director Staff Request
Amendment to Tobacco Retailers License to include Flavored Tobacco ban
across all Retailers
Community Development Director Staff Request
Short Term Vacation Rentals in Commercial Zones Community Development Director Staff Request
November 2019 Ballot Measure asking voters to change the elected City
Clerk position to an appointed office
City Attorney Council Direction
Discussion item concerning changing City Clerk salary to ceremonial salary
rate beyond November 2019
Assistant to the City Manager Council Direction
5
DONATE LIFE MONTH PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, organ, tissue, marrow and blood donation are life-giving acts
recognized worldwide as expressions of compassion to those
in need;
WHEREAS, more than 113,000 individuals nationwide and more than
21,000 in California are currently on the national organ
transplant waiting list, and on average, 20 people die each day
while waiting due to the shortage of donated organs;
WHEREAS, more than 600,000 units of blood per year are needed to meet
the need in California;
WHEREAS, a single individual’s donation of the heart, lungs, liver, kidneys,
pancreas and small intestine can save up to eight lives;
donation of tissue can save and heal the lives of more than 75
others; and a single blood donation can help three people in
need;
WHEREAS, millions of lives each year are saved and healed by donors of
organs, tissues, marrow and blood;
WHEREAS, the spirit of giving and decision to donate are not restricted by
age or medical condition;
WHEREAS, California residents can sign up with the Donate Life California
Donor Registry when applying for or renewing their driver’s
licenses or ID cards at the California Department of Motor
Vehicles;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that in recognition of National
Donate Life Month, the month of April 2019 is hereby proclaimed “Donate
Life California Month” in the City of Hermosa Beach, and in doing so we
encourage all Californians to sign up with the Donate Life California
Registry at www.donateLIFEcalifornia.org or www.doneVIDAcalifornia.org.
EARTH HOUR PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Earth Hour, organized by the World Wildlife Fund, is a global
initiative that encourages individuals, businesses and
governments around the world to turn off all nonessential
lights for one hour on Saturday, March 30, 2019 between 8:30
and 9:30pm; and
WHEREAS, the goal of Earth Hour is to demonstrate that individual action
on a mass scale can help positively impact our planet; and
WHEREAS, climate change impacts in California are expected to increase
the severity of wildfires and storms, threatening homes,
businesses and utilities and disrupting roadways.
WHEREAS, led by the World Wildlife Fund, hundreds of millions of people
across 180 countries celebrated Earth Hour in 2018, with
lights going out in some of the world’s most famous manmade
marvels and natural wonders. Sydney’s Opera House
(Sydney), Big Ben and the Houses of Parliament (London),
the Tokyo Tower (Tokyo), the Empire State Building (New
York), Marina Bay Sands Hotel (Singapore) and the Eiffel
Tower (Paris) and many more global icons stood in darkness
as a powerful symbol of landmark environmental action; and
WHEREAS, City of Hermosa Beach Council will turn off lights on the
Hermosa Beach Pier during Earth Hour;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Stacey Armato, Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach,
do hereby proclaim the hour between 8:30 and 9:30 pm on the 30th day of
March, 2019, to be Earth Hour. I encourage all Hermosa Beach residents to
make a global statement of concern about climate change and to demonstrate
commitment to finding solutions by turning off all non-essential lights during this
time period.
1
City of Hermosa Beach
Community Development Department
Activity Report
February, 2019
BUILDING DIVISION MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT
NUMBER OF PERMITS
TYPE OF ACTIVITY CURRENT
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY
TO DATE
LAST FY
TOTAL
Building 23 39 319 324 515
Plumbing 21 11 185 173 256
Mechanical 22 10 145 115 177
Electric 25 18 211 209 321
Plan Check 9 25 169 139 237
Sewer Use 0 0 8 10 11
Res. Bldg. Reports 9 24 103 138 230
Parks & Recreation 0 0 0 0 0
In Lieu Parks & Rec 0 3 15 13 14
Board of Appeals 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Review 1 2 18 20 32
Fire Flow Fees 3 6 53 47 59
Legal Determination 0 0 0 0 0
Zoning Appeals 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Sign 2 1 23 14 18
Gen. Plan Maintenance 3 5 78 52 65
TOTALS 118 144 1,327 1,254 1,936
FEES COLLECTED
TYPE OF FEE CURRENT
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY
TO DATE
LAST FY
TOTAL
Building $23,380.09 $38,326.23 $430,593.30 $351,186.13 $506,838.00
Plumbing $4,752.00 $3,451.00 $51,169.00 $42,443.00 $65,786.10
Mechanical $4,508.00 $1,916.00 $29,097.00 $26,263.30 $42,084.30
Electric $5,608.00 $3,546.00 $54,073.50 $59,707.40 $91,513.60
Plan Check $17,963.51 $35,484.25 $254,595.51 $504,049.91 $636,657.81
Sewer Use $0.00 $0.00 $20,058.00 $39,630.98 $45,394.98
Res. Bldg. Reports $2,214.00 $5,688.00 $24,153.00 $32,109.20 $53,908.20
Parks & Recreation $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
In Lieu Parks & Rec. $0.00 $20,292.00 $184,511.00 $115,963.00 $150,758.00
Board of Appeals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Sign Review $637.00 $1,226.00 $10,648.00 $11,514.00 $17,626.00
Fire Flow Fees $356.54 $1,473.06 $13,258.50 $11,854.23 $15,549.87
Legal Determination $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Zoning Appeals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Temporary Sign $170.00 $82.00 $1,936.00 $1,134.00 $1,453.00
Gen. Plan Maintenance $3,123.00 $7,704.00 $90,627.00 $66,057.00 $87,840.00
TOTALS $62,712.14 $119,188.54 $1,164,719.81 $1,261,912.15 $1,715,409.86
2
February 2019
CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
*Patrol Checks are citywide proactive patrols.
**Short Term Vacation Rentals Cases are properties receiving citations.
***Miscellaneous complaints are any other violations not listed.
BUILDING INSPECTION ACTIVITIES
CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE
164 286 2477 2615
TYPE OF ACTIVITY CURRENT
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY
TO DATE
Radio Calls 9 6 82 67
Citations 3 0 11 39
Citizen Contacts 48 57 1096 298
Patrol Checks* 32 70 484 842
Short term vacation rentals Cases** 2 3 72 15
Smoking 379 471 2690 2164
Trash can storage 21 14 158 77
Sign violations 14 4 88 61
Construction 9 6 107 84
Noise 6 8 52 30
Public Nuisance 14 1 63 49
Encroachment 15 14 130 41
CUP Violations 23 2 151 22
Storm water pollution 11 3 32 22
Clean Bay Inspections 1 0 4 32
Styrofoam 1 0 1 4
Plastic bag ban 2 0 9 12
Miscellaneous complaints*** 22 19 238 93
3
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2019
TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS DWELLING
UNITS VALUATION
1 101 New Single Family Houses Detached 1 1 $624,644.72
2 102 New Single Family Houses Attached
3 103 New Two Family Buildings
4 104 New 3 or 4 Family Buildings
5 105 New 5 or More Family Buildings
6 213 New Hotels/Motels
7 214 New Other Non Housekeeping
8 318 New Amusement & Recreation
9 319 New Churches/Other
10 320 New Industrial Buildings
11 321 New Parking Garages.
12 322 New Service Stations/Repair Garages
13 323 New Hospitals/Other Institutional
14 324 New Offices/Banks
15 325 New Public Works/Utility Buildings
16 326 New Schools/Other Educational
17 327 New Stores/Other Merch Bldgs.
18 328 New Other Non Residential Buildings
19 329 New Structures Other Than Building 2 $40,000
20 434 Add/Alter Dwelling/Pools 18 $597,840
21 437 Add/Alter Non Residential 1 $250,000
22 438 Residential Garages/Carports
23 645 Demolition - Single Family Houses
24 646 Demolition - 2-Family Buildings
25 647 Demolition - 3-4 Family Buildings
26 648 Demolition - 5+ Family Buildings
27 649 Demolition - All Other Buildings
28
434/
437
Solar System (Fee waived if 2 or more
systems are installed) 1
23 $1,512,484.72
TOTAL UNITS ADDED FY 2018-19 TO DATE: __37__ (Including One Unit Gained from
Converting Maids Quarters to Dwelling Unit)
TOTAL UNITS DEMOLISHED/LOST FY TO DATE: __24___ (See Attached List)
TOTAL NET UNITS FY TO DATE: _13_
FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18
Total New Dwelling Units: 49 Total New Dwelling Units: 53 Total New Dwelling Units: 34
Total Demolished/Lost Units: 68 Total Demolished/Lost Units: 58 Total Demolished/Lost Units: 50
Net Unit: -19 Net Unit: -5 Net Unit: -16
4
Dwelling Units Demolished/Lost as of February, 2019 (FY 2018-19)
ADDRESS TYPE PERMIT DATE PERMIT NO. NO. OF UNIT
434 30th Street Single Family Residence 7/19/18 B18-00338 1
1610 Loma Drive 3-unit building 8/6/18 B18-00365 3
2457 Myrtle Avenue Single Family Residence 8/7/18 B18-00367 1
1706 Manhattan Avenue Single Family Residence 8/7/18 B18-00369 1
1037 2nd Street Single Family Residence 8/8/18 B18-00371 1
2131 Monterey Blvd. Single Family Residence 8/14/18 B18-00382 1
916 The Strand Single Family Residence 8/28/18 B18-00402 1
349 26th Street Single Family Residence 9/5/18 B18-00408 1
1401 Corona Single Family Residence 9/27/18 B18-00446 1
2428 The Strand Single Family Residence 10/9/18 B18-00466 1
1246 20th Place Single Family Residence 10/18/18 B18-00478 1
1830 The Strand Single Family Residence 10/18/18 B18-00479 1
157 Monterey Blvd. Single Family Residence 10/23/18 B18-00486 1
744 Longfellow Ave. Single Family Residence 11/21/18 B18-00505 1
1012 2nd Ave. Single Family Residence 11/15/18 B18-00540 1
701 Longfellow Single Family Residence 11/26/18 B18-00550 1
411 29th Street Single Family Residence 12/3/18 B18-00495 1
541 Gravely Court Single Family Residence 12/27/18 B18-00575 1
961 5th Street Single Family Residence 12/24/18 B18-00581 1
959 5th Street Single Family Residence 12/24/18 B18-00582 1
240 34th Street Single Family Residence 1/16/19 B19-00017 1
522 24th Place Single Family Residence 1/22/19 B19-00022 1
Total: 24
5
ACTIVITY REPORT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
/
February 2019
STAFF REPORT PREPARED
SUBJECT THIS MONTH THIS MONTH
LAST FY
FY TO
DATE
LAST FY TO
DATE
LAST FY
TOTAL
Appeal / Reconsideration 0 1 0 1 1
Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) - Condominiums 1 1 4 8 10
Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) - Commercial 0 0 2 0 2
C.U.P. / Precise Development Plan Amendment 0 0 3 2 3
Conditional Use Permit Modification / Revocation 0 1 0 1 2
Conditional Use Permit / Map Extension 0 0 0 3 3
Environmental Impact Report 0 0 1 0 0
Final Map 0 3 4 10 11
General Plan Amendment / Update 0 0 0 1 1
Height Limit Exception 0 0 0 0 0
Lot Line Adjustment 0 0 1 0 0
Precise Development Plan 0 0 2 2 2
Parking Plan 0 1 2 1 3
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 0 0 0 0 0
Text Amendment 0 0 4 8 11
Transit 0 0 0 0 0
Variance 0 0 0 0 0
Zone Change 0 0 0 2 2
Miscellaneous 8 11 56 54 68
Total Reports Prepared 9 18 79 93 119
NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be
listed and counted only once.
Respectfully submitted,
Frances Estrada
Building and Planning Technician
CONCUR:
Ken Robertson, Director
Community Development Department
f:\b95\cd\activity
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
ACTIVITY REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2019
Page | 1 of 2
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
ACTIVITY CURRENT MONTH FY TO DATE
Meetings Attended 2 18
Staff Reports Prepared (Consent Ordinances,
Commission/Board Vacancies, Election Results, etc.)
0 35
Minutes Pending 0 N/A
Minutes Completed/Approved 6 88
PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTS
ACTIVITY CURRENT MONTH FY TO DATE
New Requests Received 18 131
Requests Pending 15 N/A
Requests Completed 9 112
OTHER
ACTIVITY CURRENT MONTH FY TO DATE
Subpoenas/Claims Received 9 58
Legal Ads sent to Easy Reader 6 50
County Filings (Easements, Encroachments, Notices of
Completions, etc.)
19 54
Bid Openings 0 2
Documents collected for signatures
(Contracts/Agreements, Resolutions, Ordinances)
10 82
Internal Records Research Requests from Departments 6 84
Resolutions Formatted 2 19
Ordinances Formatted 0 10
Notary/Proof of Residency/Life/Oaths Services
Provided/Certifications
2 33
Appeals of Commission Decisions Processed 0 0
Campaign Statements/FPPC Forms Processed 1 N/A
Insurance Certificates Processed 4 N/A
Customer Service Surveys Received 0 1
Records Destruction Forms Received/Processed 0 1
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
ACTIVITY REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2019
Page | 2 of 2
FUTURE ELECTIONS SCHEDULE
DATE TYPE OF ELECTION JURISDICTION
November 5, 2019 City Councilmembers (2),
City Clerk (1),
City Treasurer (1)
City
November 3, 2020 Presidential Election Federal
November 2022 City Councilmembers (3) City
Respectfully Submitted by:
Linda Abbott, Deputy City Clerk
Approved by:
Nico De Anda-Scaia, Assistant to the City Manager
Page 1 of 2
March 4, 2019
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Regular Meeting of March 5, 2019
Department of Community Resources Activity Report for February 2019
The Department of Community Resources has the following information to report for the month:
HERMOSA FIVE-O SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER
For individuals 50 years of age and above
Regular programming continued through the month. The monthly activity calendar can be found at
www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=242. There were a total of 792 check-ins throughout the month for the various
events and activities.
EXCURSIONS
Open to all. A Charter Bus Company is used to transport participants to excursion sites from the Hermosa Beach
Community Center.
An excursion to Ponte Winery was held on Friday, February 15, 2019. The trip included a guided tour of the winery
and tasting followed by free time in Old Temecula for lunch and shopping. 34 were in attendance.
COMMUNITY RESOURCES DEPARTMENT EVENTS
There were no Department events in February, 2019.
P.A.R.K. AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM
Location: Hermosa Beach Community Center Rooms 4, 14, and 16
78 currently enrolled
VALLEY PARK DAY CAMP
Out of session.
HERMOSA BEACH SKATE PARK
When Hermosa schools are in session: Monday through Friday 3:00 – 7:00pm
Saturday, Sunday, Summer Break and School Holidays 12:00 – 7:00pm
CONTRACT CLASSES
Fall/Winter 2018-2019 (September 22-March 19)
All classes and activities found at http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=118
FACILITY RESERVATIONS – PRIVATE RENTALS
In addition to the private rentals listed below, the City’s Contract Classes take place throughout the following locations,
which are listed at the link above
Community Center Rooms: 5, 9 and 10 – Family Theatre, Book Club, HBLL Board Meeting, Dance Classes,
Hermosa Beach Friends of the Parks, Irish Dancing Classes, Kung Fu Classes, Hermosa Fine Arts Group,
Hermosa Arts Foundation, Blue Train Tutoring, South Bay Fire Chief’s Association, Bollyop Dancing Classes,
Tae Kwon Do, Jump Start Comedy Improv, Belly Dancing, Hermosa Beach Sister Cities, Hermosa Valley
Parent Teacher Organization, HBYB Picture Day, City Use
South Park Rooms: 4 – Suicide Bereavement Support Group, Leadership Hermosa, Golden Star Classes,
Social Skills Workshop, HOA Meetings
Community Center Gymnasium – Private Reservations; Youth and Adult Play
Community Center Tennis Courts – Hermosa Beach Residents, Private Instructors
Clark Building: Jazzercise Classes, Monday Night 5th Tradition, Hermosa Beach Garden Club, Hermosa
Beach Women’s Club
Valley Park: Picnic Tables, Amphitheatre and Fire Pit – Available for Hermosa Beach Residents
South Park: Picnic Tables – Available for Hermosa Beach Residents
Page 2 of 2
FIELD ALLOCATION
Clark Field: Hermosa Beach Little League
South Park: None
Valley Park: Leverage Lacrosse
OUTDOOR FITNESS PERMITS
None
STILL PHOTO/FILM PERMITS
DAY EVENT LOCATION
7 Dell Private Location
12 MTV – Teen Mom OG Private Location and beach
12 MRB Productions Private Location
4-7 Veronica Mars Episode #106 & #107 Private Locations, beach, and
Strand
24-26 Veronica Mars Episode #108
Private Locations, beach,
Strand and various downtown
streets
SPECIAL EVENTS
# OF SPECIAL EVENTS
2
COMMUNITY THEATRE AND 2ND STORY THEATRE RESERVATIONS
2nd Story Theatre
1-3 Angry Jurors – Surf City Theatre Co.
9 April’s Fools Comedy Improv Troupe
11 Sandpiper Juniors
25, 27 The Sunshine Boys – Surf City Theatre Co.
27 Family Theatre Inc.
28 Hermosa Beach Little League
Community Theatre
3, 6, 10, 13, 24, 27 Shrek – Family Theatre Inc.
5, 7, 11-12, 15, 17-22 Trolls – Beryl Heights Elementary
8 Winter Showcase – Ballet Pacifica
Respectfully Submitted: Lisa Nichols, Recreation Coordinator and Kambria Vint, Office Assistant
Approved by: Kelly Orta, Community Resources Manager
1
March 18, 2019
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ACTIVITY REPORT, FEBRUARY 2019
STATISTICAL SECTION
Finance Administration
CURRENT
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST FY
FISCAL YEAR
TO DATE
LAST FISCAL
YR TO DATE
AVERAGE T.O.T.
OCCUPANCY RATE
68.2%
January 2019
70.5%
January 2018
79.5%
January 2019
80.4%
January 2018
INVOICES/ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE
1 5 229 247
CASH REGISTER
TRANSACTIONS 11,869 9,668 74,133 49,719
CHECKS ISSUED 187 215 2,080 2,249
PURCHASE ORDERS 103 114 1,057 1,168
DISCOUNTS TAKEN $192 $12 $922 $770
REBATES:
Landscape/St. Light (2018 Tax Yr) 11 11 66 80
Sewer Service Fee (2018 Tax Yr) 9 4 51 92
UUT EXEMPTIONS
TO DATE (1) 2,094 (0) 2,084
PAYROLL
Full Time Employees 123 123
Part Time Employees 27 15
CITATION PAYMENTS 3,794 3,110 33,065 28,184
DMV PAYMENTS 534 451 3,467 3,088
DELINQUENT
NOTICES SENT:
California 1,701 1,551 17,237 14,939
Out of State 254 160 3,135 2,249
TOTAL: 1,955 1,711 20,372 17,188
NOTED: Respectfully submitted:
___________________________ __________________________
Suja Lowenthal Viki Copeland,
City Manager Finance Director
Finance Cashier
CURRENT
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST FY
FISCAL YEAR
TO DATE
LAST FISCAL
YR TO DATE
DISMISSALS 221 134 2,056 1,601
REVENUE - VEH.
IMPOUNDS
$1,005 $0 $3,126 $1,972
PARKING PERMITS:
Driveway 2 1 23 18
Guest Party Passes 74 157 2,500 2,724
Temp. Res. Passes 0 0 0 0
Contractor 89 71 741 821
Daily 3 8 104 95
Annual Preferential
Transferable 1,908 1,923 2,241 2,221
Employee Vehicle
Sticker
45 52 81 92
Vehicle 2,078 2,082 2,619 2,663
Energy Efficient
Vehicles 110 94 142 119
TOTAL: 4,141 4,151 5,083 5,095
MONTHLY (DAILY)
PERMITS FOR PARKING
LOTS 123 134 1,104 1,042
MONTHLY (24 HR)
PERMITS FOR PARKING
LOTS 154 114 1,150 973
MTA BUS PASSES
City Subsidized for
Senior, Disabled, or
Student Residents 8 7 46 58
METRO Discounted for
Senior, Disabled, or
Student Riders 0 0 0 0
Full Price Bus Passes 3 2 46 67
TAXI VOUCHERS SOLD 280 300 3,220 3,180
TAXI VOUCHERS USED 333 332 2,572 2,580
CASH KEYS SOLD 0 0 1 0
CASH KEY REVENUE $0 $0 $119 $20
ANIMAL LICENSES 12 9 578 593
BUSINESS LICENSES
Licenses Issued 198 213 1,868 1,660
Revenue $63,833 $69,367 $572,465 $546,731
E100 S100 Total
FIRE, EXPLOSION
113 ‐ Cooking fire, confined to container 1 1 0.45%
FIRE, EXPLOSION Total 1 1 0.45%
RESCUE, EMS
300 ‐ Rescue, emergency medical call (EMS) call, other 77 72 149 66.52%
353 ‐ Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 3 3 1.34%
611 ‐ Dispatched & cancelled enroute 4 4 8 3.57%
700 ‐ False alarm or false call, other 1 1 0.45%
RESCUE, EMS Total 84 77 161 71.88%
SERVICE CALL
510 ‐ Person in distress, other 7 2 9 4.02%
520 ‐ Water problem, other 1 1 0.45%
SERVICE CALL Total 8 2 10 4.46%
GOOD INTENT CALL
600 ‐ Good intent call, other 1 1 0.45%
611 ‐ Dispatched & cancelled enroute 25 2 27 12.05%
651 ‐ Smoke scare, odor of smoke 3 3 1.34%
GOOD INTENT CALL Total 29 2 31 13.84%
FALSE ALARM, FALSE CALL
700 ‐ False alarm or false call, other 19 1 20 8.93%
744 ‐ Detector activation, no fire ‐ unintentional 1 1 0.45%
FALSE ALARM, FALSE CALL Total 20 1 21 9.38%
Grand Total 142 82 224 100.00%
Note:
Data based on fireview report. Hermosa Beach units responses.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
HERMOSA BEACH
FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2019
Incident Type UNIT RESPONSES Percentage
Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Services Coordinator 1
DAY OF THE WEEK E100 S100 Total
Sunday 39 21 60
Monday 16 10 26
Tuesday 10 6 16
Wednesday 18 12 30
Thursday 21 7 28
Friday 15 13 28
Saturday 23 13 36
Grand Total 142 82 224
Note:
Data based on fireview report. Hermosa Beach units responses.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
HERMOSA BEACH
FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2019
UNIT RESPONSES
‐
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
E100
S100
Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Services Coordinator 2
TIME OF THE DAY E100 S100 Total
00:00:00 TO 00:59:59 5 3 8
01:00:00 TO 01:59:59 4 3 7
02:00:00 TO 02:59:59 6 3 9
03:00:00 TO 03:59:59 4 3 7
04:00:00 TO 04:59:59 7 1 8
05:00:00 TO 05:59:59 2 2
06:00:00 TO 06:59:59 4 4 8
07:00:00 TO 07:59:59 4 1 5
08:00:00 TO 08:59:59 2 1 3
09:00:00 TO 09:59:59 12 8 20
10:00:00 TO 10:59:59 6 5 11
11:00:00 TO 11:59:59 16 7 23
12:00:00 TO 12:59:59 6 1 7
13:00:00 TO 13:59:59 4 4 8
14:00:00 TO 14:59:59 5 3 8
15:00:00 TO 15:59:59 11 4 15
16:00:00 TO 16:59:59 7 5 12
17:00:00 TO 17:59:59 8 3 11
18:00:00 TO 18:59:59 4 4 8
19:00:00 TO 19:59:59 7 7 14
20:00:00 TO 20:59:59 7 3 10
21:00:00 TO 21:59:59 4 2 6
22:00:00 TO 22:59:59 3 4 7
23:00:00 TO 23:59:59 4 3 7
Grand Total 142 82 224
Note:
Data based on fireview report. Hermosa Beach units responses.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
HERMOSA BEACH
FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2019
UNIT RESPONSES
‐
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
00:00:00 TO 00:59:5901:00:00 TO 01:59:5902:00:00 TO 02:59:5903:00:00 TO 03:59:5904:00:00 TO 04:59:5905:00:00 TO 05:59:5906:00:00 TO 06:59:5907:00:00 TO 07:59:5908:00:00 TO 08:59:5909:00:00 TO 09:59:5910:00:00 TO 10:59:5911:00:00 TO 11:59:5912:00:00 TO 12:59:5913:00:00 TO 13:59:5914:00:00 TO 14:59:5915:00:00 TO 15:59:5916:00:00 TO 16:59:5917:00:00 TO 17:59:5918:00:00 TO 18:59:5919:00:00 TO 19:59:5920:00:00 TO 20:59:5921:00:00 TO 21:59:5922:00:00 TO 22:59:5923:00:00 TO 23:59:59E100
S100
Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Services Coordinator 3
McCormick Ambulance
February 2019
Total Number of Dispatched Calls
Dispatched Calls Totals
Transported 53
Cancelled 32
Grand Total 85
53, 62%
32, 38%
Total Dispatched Calls
Transported
Cancelled
Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Services Coordinator 4
Calls per the day of the week
Day of the Week Completed Cancelled Total
Sunday 14 9 23
Monday 6 4 10
Tuesday 4 0 4
Wednesday 9 5 14
Thursday 4 4 8
Friday 8 5 10
Saturday 8 5 13
Grand Total 53 32 85
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Completed
Canceled
Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Services Coordinator 5
Response by the Time of Day
Time of Day Total Response
00:00:00 TO 00:59:59 3
01:00:00 TO 01:59:59 3
02:00:00 TO 02:59:59 5
03:00:00 TO 03:59:59 3
04:00:00 TO 04:59:59 2
05:00:00 TO 05:59:59 0
06:00:00 TO 06:59:59 4
07:00:00 TO 07:59:59 1
08:00:00 TO 08:59:59 1
09:00:00 TO 09:59:59 9
10:00:00 TO 10:59:59 5
11:00:00 TO 11:59:59 7
12:00:00 TO 12:59:59 4
13:00:00 TO 13:59:59 3
14:00:00 TO 14:59:59 3
15:00:00 TO 15:59:59 5
16:00:00 TO 16:59:59 3
17:00:00 TO 17:59:59 2
18:00:00 TO 18:59:59 4
19:00:00 TO 19:59:59 7
20:00:00 TO 20:59:59 3
21:00:00 TO 21:59:59 2
22:00:00 TO 22:59:59 3
23:00:00 TO 23:59:59 3
Grand Total 85
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
00:00:00 TO 00:59:5901:00:00 TO 01:59:5902:00:00 TO 02:59:5903:00:00 TO 03:59:5904:00:00 TO 04:59:5905:00:00 TO 05:59:5906:00:00 TO 06:59:5907:00:00 TO 07:59:5908:00:00 TO 08:59:5909:00:00 TO 09:59:5910:00:00 TO 10:59:5911:00:00 TO 11:59:5912:00:00 TO 12:59:5913:00:00 TO 13:59:5914:00:00 TO 14:59:5915:00:00 TO 15:59:5916:00:00 TO 16:59:5917:00:00 TO 17:59:5918:00:00 TO 18:59:5919:00:00 TO 19:59:5920:00:00 TO 20:59:5921:00:00 TO 21:59:5922:00:00 TO 22:59:5923:00:00 TO 23:59:59Time of Day
Responses
Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Services Coordinator 6
Response Times Within Allowable
Time
Delayed Response Cancelled Total
Code 3: Response
Time of 8:59 or less
21 4 0 25
Code 2: Response
Time of 15:00 or
less
28 0 0 28
Cancelled
Responses
0 0 32 32
Grand Total 49 4 32 85
Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Services Coordinator 7
Violent CrimesFeb Jan Diff % Change 2019 2018 Diff % Change 2019 2018 Diff % ChangeMurder 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0%Sex Crimes 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0%Robbery1 1 0 0.0% 1 01N.C.202N.C.Aggravated Assaults404N.C.413300.0% 4 22 100.0%Simple Assault 2 6 -4 -66.7% 2 2 0 0.0% 8 62 33.3%Total Violent Crimes 7 700.0% 7 34 133.3%14 86 75.0%Property CrimesFeb Jan Diff % Change 2019 2018 Diff % Change 2019 2018 Diff % ChangeBurglary 11 14 -3 -21.4% 11 92 22.2%25 205 25.0%Theft22 2114.8%22 2114.8%43 46 -3 -6.5%Auto Theft422 100.0%422 100.0%642 50.0%Total Property Crimes 37 37 0 0.0% 37 32515.6%74 704 5.7%Total Violent/Property Crimes 44 44 0 0.0% 44 359 25.7%88 7810 12.8%ArrestsFeb Jan Diff % Change 2019 2018 Diff % Change 2019 2018 Diff % ChangeDUI 8 62 33.3%826 300.0%14 122 16.7%Adult40 337 21.2%40 364 11.1%73 89 -16 -18.0%Juvenile 0 2 -2 -100.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 2 020.0%CitationsFeb Jan Diff % Change 2019 2018 Diff % Change 2019 2018 Diff % ChangeMisdemeanor 12 9333.3% 12 40 -28 -70.0% 21 85 -64 -75.3%Muni Code 2 4 -2 -50.0% 2 16 -14 -87.5% 6 37 -31 -83.8%Traffic 67 77 -10 -13.0% 67 91 -24 -26.4% 144 165 -21 -12.7%Parking 4642 45211212.7% 4642 4013629 15.7%9163 8229934 11.4%Animal Control 3 03N.C.303N.C.303N.C.Traffic Accident ReportsFeb Jan Diff % Change 2019 2018 Diff % Change 2019 2018 Diff % ChangeFatal 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0%Injury 3 03N.C.3 4 -1 -25.0% 3 10 -7 -70.0%Non-Injury 9 16 -7 -43.8% 9 20 -11 -55.0% 25 40 -15 -37.5%Calls For ServiceFeb Jan Diff % Change 2019 2018 Diff % Change 2019 2018 Diff % ChangeCalls For Service 1816 2232 -416 -18.6% 1816 2229 -413 -18.5% 4048 4350 -302 -6.9%Parking 204 231 -27 -11.7% 204 262 -58 -22.1% 435 504 -69 -13.7%Animal Control 112 9715 15.5%112 216 -104 -48.1% 209 385 -176 -45.7%INCREASEN.C. Not Calculable. To calculate the percentage change you use Time 1 - Time 2/Time2= a number x100= Percentage change. You cannot divide any number by 0 and receive a valid numberHermosa Beach Police DepartmentMonthly Crime and Activity StatisticsFebruary 20192019 Feb YTD2019 Feb YTD2019 Feb YTD2019 Feb YTD2019 Feb YTD2019 Feb YTDRespectfully Submitted to: City Manager Suja LowenthalApproved by: Acting Chief Milton McKinnonPrepared by: Xochitl EscutiaAs in all statistical comparisons, caution should be exercised in interpreting percent changes. When smaller numbers are compared the result is a greater percentage change; in other words, a more dramatic result is achieved.*Due to change in reporting processes there may be a variation in previously reported statistics
March 14, 2019
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 20, 2019
PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT
ACTIVITY REPORT
February 2019
CURRENT THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY
STATISTICS MONTH LAST YEAR DATE TO DATE
Workers Comp Claims
Claims opened 1 1 8 8
Claims closed 2 3 16 9
Total open 55 62
Current Employee 13 23
Lost time (hours)
Police 84 144 1718 4020
(Fire included in last FY)
Non-Safety 0 0 0 0
Liability Claims
Claims opened 1 3 8 17
Claims closed 0 1 14 13
Total open 14 23
Employee-Involved
Vehicle Accidents
Safety 0 0 0 1
Non-safety 0 0 0 1
Employee Turnover
Safety 0 1 0 18
Non-Safety 1 2 9 6
_____________________________________________________________
Respectfully submitted: Vanessa Godinez, Human Resources Manager
Concur: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
1 of 2
INFILTRATION PROJECT TIMELINE
03.26.19 City Council Meeting Staff Report: Greenbelt Infiltration Project Next Steps
02.26.19 City Manager Update at February 26, 2019 City Council Meeting
02.21.19 Staff sent Project Director Certification, Deviation Request form and Request for Time
Extension to State Water Resources Control Board
02.12.19 City Manager Update at February 12, 2019 City Council Meeting, followed by
Information Item to City Council and posted on City website
02.04.19 Staff Meeting: Hb, RB, MB and Torrance Staff
01.08.19 City Manager Update at January 8, 2019 City Council Meeting
12.05.18 City Council Subcommittee and Staff Meeting: Hb and RB City Council Subcommittees
and Staff
11.27.18 City Manager Update at November 27, 2019 City Council Meeting
10.29.18 Hb City Council Subcommittee met with RB Councilmember Christian Horvath
10.24.18 Hb City Council Subcommittee met with RB Councilmember Todd Lowenstein
10.09.18 City Council Meeting Staff Report: Consideration of Alternative Locations for the
Greenbelt Infiltration Project
08.29.18 Community Tour of Existing Stormwater Infiltration Project Sites:
Manhattan Beach Greenbelt Site Tour
Lakewood Bolivar Park Site Tour
Lakewood Mayfair Park Site Tour
06.19.18 City Council Study Session Staff Report: Greenbelt Infiltration Project
05.10.18 Community Tour & Meeting: Stormwater Infiltration Project
03.29.18 Community Tour & Meeting: Stormwater Infiltration Project
09.26.17 City Council Meeting Staff Report: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Hermosa Beach authorizing the City Manager to file a financial assistance application
with the State Water Resources Control Board to fund the City’s Greenbelt Infiltration
Project
09.12.17 City Council Meeting Staff Report: Award of Professional Services Agreement to Tetra
Tech, Inc. for Professional Engineering Design Services for the Greenbelt Infiltration
Project
2 of 2
08.22.17 City Council Meeting Staff Report: MOU between Cities of Hermosa Beach, Manhattan
Beach, Redondo Beach and Torrance for Implementation of Joint Regional Projects
within the SMB 6-01 Analysis Region of the Beach Cities Enhance Watershed
Management Program (EWMP), Adopt a Resolution authorizing a Resolution of the City
Council of the City of Hermosa Beach authorizing the City Manager to file a financial
assistance application with the State Water Resources Control Board to fund the City’s
Greenbelt Infiltration Project
09.19.16 City Council Study Session Staff Report: Municipal Stormawater Permit Update
02.09.16 MOU between the Beach Cities Watershed Management Group for Administration and
Cost Sharing for Coordination and Implementation of the Coordinated Integrated
monitoring Program
06.25.15 Approve the Notice of Intent Package to the Regional Board to Comply with the MS4
Permit
06.23.15 Authorize the submission of the draft EWMP to the LARWQCB and adopt Los Angeles
County Program Environmental Impact Report and Corresponding Documentation
10.30.14 Amendment to MOU to develop Beach Cities EWMP
11.12.13 Approval of MOU to develop Beach Cities EWMP
02.26.13 Approval to Proceed with Enhance Watershed Management Plan (EWMP)
Implementation