HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/09/90"We must accept finite disappointment, but we must
never lose infinite hope." -Martin Luther King, Jr.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, January 9, 1990 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Closed Session - 6:00 p.m.
Regular Session - 7:30 p.m.
MAYOR
Roger Creighton
MAYOR PRO TEM
Chuck Sheldon
COUNCILMEMBERS
Robert Essertier
Kathleen Midstokke
Albert Wiemans
CITY CLERK
Elaine Doerfling
CITY TREASURER
Gary L. Brutsch
CITY MANAGER
Kevin B. Northcraft
CITY ATTORNEY
Charles S. Vose
All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in
the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City
Clerk.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:
INTRODUCTION OF NEW POLICE OFFICER: Garth Gaines
,
AND NEW CANINE OFFICER: Le Norbo De La Temerite (NORBO)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF DONATIONS TO THE CITY FOR CANINE PROGRAM, THE
POLICE D.A.R.E. PROGRAM, NEW -BADGES FOR POLICE OFFICERS, AND
DONATION OF TWO SIDEWALK SWEEPERS AND A TRAILER TO PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the
Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to
speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal
Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on
items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction
will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit
comments to three minutes.
Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental
operations are requested to submit those comments to the City
Manager.
- 1 -
j'ii3/:.:,dc«,.Y�.td
1.
(a)
CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be
acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con-
sent of the City Council. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by
a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed
will be considered under Agenda Item 3.)
Recommendation to approve minutes as follows:
1) Adjourned regular meeting of City Council held on
December 9, 1989;
2) Special meeting of the City Council and School Dis-
trict Board of Trustees held at 4 p.m. on December
12, 1989;
3) Regular meeting of the City Council held at 7:30
p.m. on December 12, 1989.
(b _ Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants
Nos. through inclusive.
(d)
(e)
(g)
(h)
(i)
Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
Recommendation to receive and file the November, 1989
City Treasurer's Report.
Recommendation to adopt resolution relative to the An-
nual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Her-
mosa Beach for the year 1990. Memorandum from City
Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated December 18, 1989.
Recommendation to authorize Mayor to sign agreement for
preliminary Engineering Services for Community Center
Electrical Upgrade to John Snyder and Associates at a
cost of $5,880. Memorandum from Public Works Director
Anthony Antich dated December 14, 1989.
Recommendation to approve renewal of lease agreement
between City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel for space
at the Community Center. Memorandum from Acting Com-
munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 28,
1989.
Recommendation to approve requests for Professional
Beach Volleyball Tournaments to be held in Summer 1990
and authorize Mayor to sign contracts. Memorandum from
Acting Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated
December 20, 1989.
Recommendation to confirm depositing of final proceeds
of sale of Seaview property into the 4% UUT railroad
right-of-way acquisition fund, and authorize disburse-
ment from those funds of $3,949 to Coast Mortgage and
Realty Investors. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B.
Northcraft dated December 26, 1989.
(n)
Recommendation to approve additional work on existing
fire alarm system to bring up to current standards at a
cost not to exceed $2,500; authorize staff to purchase
fire equipment, at a cost not to exceed $4,600; reject
all bids received at the June 27, 1989 meeting. Memo-
randum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated
December 6, 1989.
Recommendation to receive and file the following 1988-89
Financial reports:
1) Comprehensive Annual Financial and Audit report,
and
2) Management Letter.
Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated
January 3, 1990.
Recommendation to approve schedule for Environmental
Impact Report, General Plan amendment, Conditional Use
Permit, and Lease Agreement for oil production. Memo-
randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
January 3, 1990.
Recommendation to deny the following claims for damages
and refer to the City Attorney:
1) The Vons Companies, Inc., 618 Michillinda Ave.,
Arcadia, CA 91007-1734, filed January 2, 1990; al-
leged failure to repeal Section 30-64 of Ordinance
86-837 (Utility Users Tax);
2) The Vons Companies, Inc. (TVCI), 618 Michillinda
Ave., Arcadia, CA 91007-1734, filed January 2,
1990; alleged failure to process refund for 1988
Utility Users Tax.
Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert A. Blackwood dated
January 2, 1990.
Recommendation to authorize settlement of claim filed
January 3, 1990 by Brian C. Rumble, for damage to his
vehicle, in an amount not to exceed $4,500. Memorandum
from Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated January 4,
1990
CONSENT ORDINANCES.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.
5. DRAFT CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING ELEMENT OF
THE GENERAL PLAN. (Continued from December 12, 1989
meeting.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated January 2, 1990.
6. INTERIM ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE 17
FT. SETBACK THE PROVISION OF FOUR PARKING SPACES, AND TO
WAIVE THE 17 FT. SETBACK FOR CERTAIN SMALL LOTS AND LOTS
ON NARROW ALLEYS. Memorandum from Planning Director
Michael Schubach dated January 2, 1990.
7. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD GYMNASIUM/HEALTH AND FITNESS CEN-
TER TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST FOR THE C-2 ZONE, WITH
ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning
Director Michael Schubach dated January 2, 1990.
8. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO GRANT A MASTER
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTO AGENCIES, INCLUDING
STORAGE AND SALES OF PARTS AT 2771, 2851, 2901 AND 3001
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, VASEK POLAK AUTO DEALERSHIPS.
Councilmembers Kathleen Midstokke and Albert Wiemans,
appellants. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach-dated-January 2, 1990.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
9.✓}-� PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON VALLEY DRIVE BETWEEN GOULD AND
N' HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL.
(9-:1\\ A. SIGHT DISTANCE AT 24TH STREET AND 24TH PLACE;
B. CONSIDERATION OF BIKEWAY ON VALLEY DRIVE.
Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich
dated January 2, 1990.
10. CONSIDERATION OF ADJUSTMENT TO PARK AND RECREATION IN -
LIEU FEE, WITH RESO �j,�N FOR ADOPTION. Memorandum from
Building and William Grove dated Decem-
ber 26, 1989.. -
1 RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT ON RAMIFICA-
TIONS OF WITHDRAWAL FROM CDBG. Memorandum from City
Attorney Charles S. Vose.
RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT EMPLOYER/EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION
RELATIONS RESOLUTION. Memorandum from Personnel Direc-
tor Robert Blackwood dated January 1, 1990.
13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Ct( Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
t
1? -/(a) Request by Councilmember Midstokke for discussion of
allowable uses in the open space zones. (Continued from
December 12, 1989 meeting.) Memorandum from Planning
Director Michael Schubach dated December 4, 1989.
- 4 -
(b)
(c)
(d)
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to
discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back
on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun-
cil action tonight.
Request by Councilmember Midstokke for discussion of
rezoning and disposition of the Biltmore site. (Con-
tinued from December 12, 1989 meeting.)
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis-
cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a
future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council
action tonight.
Request by Councilmember Wiemans for discussion of
requiring conditional use permit for new commercial
developments such as hotels. (Continued from December
12, 1989 meeting.)
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis-
cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a
future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council
action tonight.
Request by Councilmember Sheldon for discussion re.
zoning standards in residential zones, i.e., lot
coverage, parking, setbacks, etc.; and height limit,
setbacks, parking and bulk in commercial zones. (Con-
tinued from December 12, 1989 meeting.)
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis-
ucss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a
future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council
action tonight.
CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on
the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do
so at this time.
ADJOURNMENT TO 6 P.M., JANUARY 11, 1990 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
TO CONTINUE GOAL SETTING DISCUSSIONS.
MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED LIVE ON CHANNEL 10.
- 5 -
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, December 12, 1989 at
the hour of 7:37 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION - pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)
regarding potential litigation: Joe and Martha Metcalfe, claim
number 89-05-2; Real Estate negotiations with Hermosa Beach
School District regarding South School and Prospect Heights at
the hour of 7:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Robert Essertier
ROLL CALL
Present: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton
Absent: None
INTRODUCTION OF NEW POLICE OFFICERS: Dorothy Hatano
Garth Gaines
Personnel Director Robert Blackwood introduced Police Officer
Dorothy Hatano and presented her a Certificate of Appointment.
The Mayor and City Manager welcomed Officer Hatano. Officer Garth
Gaines was on a call and unable to attend.
1
NEW CANINE OFFICER: Le Norbo De La Temerite(NORBO) - Norbo was
on call with Officer Gaines. He will be introduced at a future
meeting.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF DONATIONS TO THE CITY.
Continued to the next meeting on January 9, 1990.
PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE AND PROCLAMATION TO THE DEPARTING
COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR ALANA MASTRIAN-HANDMAN
Director Mastrian-Handman was unable to attend due to a Community
Resources Meeting. Mayor Creighton read the Proclamation and
Certificate which will be given to Director Mastrian-Handman.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Dr. Joanne Rudkers - 615 Gould Terrace - requested Council appeal
decision of Planning Commission regarding bar at Hermosa Hotel.
James Lissner - 2715 El Oeste - seconded previous request.
James Duetsch - representing Citizens Concern Group of 30th St. -
requested CUP approved by Planning Commission be appealed by
Council.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations
(a) through (o) with the exception of the following
items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in
order for clarity: (e) Essertier, (f) Essertier, (i)
Midstokke, and (1) Midstokke
Motion Sheldon, second Essertier. So ordered.
- 1 - Minutes 12-12-89
�. _s
•r -
(a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of
the City Council held on November 28, 1989.
(b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants
Nos. 31915 through 31923 inclusive and 31925 through
32031 inclusive; noting voided warrant Nos. 31916, 31925
through 31927 inclusive and 31942.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
(d) Recommendation to receive and file November, 1989 Month-
ly Investment Report. Memorandum from City Treasurer
Gary L. Brutsch dated December 4, 1989.
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
Recommendation to award bid for purchase of computer
equipment for the Fire, Police, and Civil Defense
Departments. Memorandum from Public Safety Director
Steve Wisniewski dated November 22,,1989.
Action: To receive and file
Motion Essertier, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting
the objection of Midstokke and Mayor Creighton.
Recommendation to approve purchase of Desk -Top Publish-
ing. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director
Henry L. Staten dated November 27, 1989. Supplemental
information from Marguerite Sturges, Computer System
Manager, dated December 11, 1989.
Action: To receive and file.
Motion Essertier, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting
the objection of Mayor Creighton.
Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map
#13652 for a two -unit condominium located at 600 llth
Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated December 4, 1989.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5333, entitled, ',A
RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #13652
FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM LOCATED AT 600 ELEVENTH
STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA."
Recommendation to receive and file progress report on
un -reinforced masonry building hazard mitigation pro-
gram. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director
William Grove dated December 4, 1989.
Recommendation to approve renewal of property and vehi-
cle insurance. Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert
Blackwood dated December 5, 1989. Supplemental memo
from Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated December 12,
1989.
- 2 - Minutes 12-12-89
•
.�.w _.ar_ aa..,r..«�...,n....:...ak•..�.:Jw�.✓,..��.�tl�.:.aw�+�wr.,:�
(j)
(k)
Action: To approve staff recommendation by.awarding the
renewal of the City's property and vehicle insurance to
the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA)
Broker, Frank B. Hall and Company. Property insurance
to be placed in an amount not to exceed $9,300 for the
term 12-18-89 through 7-1-90 with renewal 7-1-90 ata
premium not to exceed $17,400; Vehicle damage insurance
to be placed with St. Paul Insurance Company for an an-
nual premium not to exceed $9.000.
Motion Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered.
Recommendation to approve plans and specifications for
CIP 89-142, Sidewalk repair. Memorandum from Public
Works Director Anthony Antich dated December 5, 1989.
Recommendation to receive and file ordinance regarding
elimination of the video sales/rentals in the C-2 zone.
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
December 5, 1989.
(1) . Recommendation to receive and file report on the housing
rehabilitation plan as part of City's Community Develop-
ment Block Grant program. Memorandum from Planning Di-
rector Michael Schubach dated December 5, 1989. Supple -
memo from Andrea Anderson, Planning Aide, dated December
12, 1989, at the request of Councilmember Midstokke.
(m)
(n)
(o)
Action: Request the City Attorney give us a memorandum
as to withdrawing from the remainder of the program.
Motion Midstokke, second Wiemans. So ordered, noting
the objection of Councilmember Sheldon.
Recommendation to authorize sale of forfeited property
pursuant to Section 11489 of the California Health and
Safety Code. Memorandum from Public Safety Director
Steve Wisniewski dated December 5, 1989.
Recommendation to deny the following claim and refer to
City's Claims Administrator:
1) Gregory W. Moreno, 5146 East Olympic Blvd., Los
Angeles 90022, on behalf of the Estate of Jocobo
Vasquez Palacios, filed December 4, 1989; alleged
dangerous condition of roadway. Claim #89-12-1.
Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the
City and Project Touch for space in the Community Cen-
ter. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana
Mastrian-Handman dated December 4. 1989.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES.
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 89-1021 - "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER
27A, "SANITATION, GARBAGE AND REFUSE" AS IT RELATES TO
SALVAGING." For adoption.
- 3 - Minutes 12-12-89
Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-1021.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
Items (e), (f), (i), and (1) were discussed at this time
but are listed in order for clarity.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC - None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. APPEAL OF DENIAL BY PLANNING COMMISSION OF VARIANCE
REQUEST TO 171 SETBACK AT 3133 THE STRAND. Christopher
& Janet Coppersmith, appellants. Memorandum from Plan-
ning Director Michael Schubach dated December 4, 1989.
Supplemental letter from Lawrence S. Gray, Jr., 2426 The
Strand, dated December 11, 1989. Two supplemental memos
from Planning Director Michael Schubach, dated December
11, 1989. Supplemental letter from Kenneth Snyder, 3001
The Strand, dated December 12, 1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
Addressing the Council on this item were:
Chris Coppersmith - 3133 The Strand - in favor
Brian O'Mally - 3330 The Strand - in favor
Joanne Bland - Resident of Hermosa Beach - in favor
Don Hovis - Architect, 1848 S. Elena, R.B. - in favor
Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place - opposed
Chris Coppersmith - rebuttal
Proposed Action: To approve the variance.
Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. Objection by Mid-
stokke, Sheldon, and Mayor Creighton. Motion fails.
Action - To direct staff to return to Council on January
9, 1990 with an interim ordinance, pursuant to Section
65858 of the State Planning and Zoning Law, which waives
the 17' setback on alleys, if parking space is provided
for four (4) vehicles.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered
Final Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5334, entitled,
"A RESOLUTION DENYING THE APPEAL OF, AND THEREBY
AFFIRMING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A VARIANCE
TO ALLOW AN ENCROACHMENT INTO THE REQUIRED 171 GARAGE
SETBACK AT 3133 THE STRAND, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 23,
BLOCK 1. SHAKESPEARE TRACT."
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
A recess was called at 9:00 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 9:15 P.M.
- 4 -
Minutes 12-12-89
6. REVIEW OF DRAFT CIRCULATION ELEMENT. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 5,
1989. (Recommendation: to receive testimony and con-
tinue to January 9, 1990 meeting.) Suppl. memo from Ed
Ruzak, City Traffic Engineer, dated Dec.5, 1989. James
Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, submitted two Supp. letters dat-
ed December 5th and 6th plus an information sheet dated
Dec. 7, 1989. Emily S. Mager, 451 Gould Avenue, submit-
ted two Suppl. letters dated December 7, 1989. Suppl.
letter from David K. Suess, 1246 First Street, dated
December 12, 1989. Suppl. letter from R.C. Turkola, 624
Gould, dated December 11, 1989. Suppl. letter from
Allen and Karen White, 612 Gould, dated December 12,
1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
The Planning Commission recommendations were presented
by James Peirce, Planning Commission member.
Addressing the Council on this item were:
James Lissner - 2715 El Oeste
Connie Winters - 2715 Gould
Jim Parkman - 657 Porter Lane
Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street
Bruce Gelb - 2726 El Oeste
George Schmeltzer - 1612 The Strand
Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place
Parker Herriott - 222 Twenty-fourth
Wesley Bush - Executive Director, Chamber of Commerce
Jerry Compton - 832 Seventh
Lance Widman - 1015 fourth Street
Action: To continue Public Hearing to January 9, 1990.
Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered.
Further Action: To allow questions by Council.
Motion Creighton, second Wiemans. So ordered.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
7. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF CITY CLERK FOR REMAINDER
OF TERM ENDING NOVEMBER, 1991. Memorandum from Deputy
City Clerk Linda Riddle dated December 6, 1989.
Action: To unanimously appoint Elaine Doerfling City
Clerk for an unexpired term ending November, 1991.
Motion Essertier, second Midstokke. So ordered.
8. PRESENTATION OF FIRE FLOW CONSULTANT'S REPORT. Memoran-
dum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated
December 5, 1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Wisniewski.
- 5 -
Minutes 12-12-89
-
Mr. Coleman, Phenix Technology explained and summarized
the study and report completed by their company.
Mr. Terry Tamples, representing the California Water
Company, answered Councils questions.
Addressing the council on this matter was:
Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place
Action: To receive and file.
Motion Sheldon, second Midstokke. So ordered.
9. RECOMMENDATION REGARDING UPGRADING VS. INSTALLING A NEW
SYSTEM, COMMUNITY CENTER FIRE ALARM SYSTEM CIP 89-615.
Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich
dated December 6, 1989.
This item was withdrawn before the meeting.
10. RECOMMENDATION FOR NEW CITY BUS BENCHES AND SHELTERS.
Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich
dated December 4, 1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Antich.
Action: To approve staff recommendation as follows:
(1) direct staff to construct City type benches at all
bus stop locations, where it is safe to do so; (2) Have
the existing advertisement type bus benches removed only
as the City type bus benches are constructed at each
site; (3) Benches should be standard bus benches with
the following description: No more than twenty (20)
inches high, no more than eighteen (18) inches wide, no
more than eight (8) feet long; each bench should be
backless and each bench shall be three (3) two by six
wooden planks on permanent slumpstone bases.
Motion Midstokke, second Creighton
Proposed Action: Substitute motion for item three
of the main motion is to use bus bench style # 3.
Motion Essertier, second Sheldon.
AYES: Essertier and Sheldon
NOES: Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton
Motion failed.
Proposed Action: Substitute motion for item three
of the main motion is to use bus bench style # 1.
Motion Wiemans, second Sheldon.
AYES: Wiemans and Sheldon
NOES: Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Creighton.
Motion failed.
- 6 -
Minutes 12-12-89
(3)
(3)
Final Action: To approve the original motion.
Motion Midstokke, second Creighton.
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
(a) Sample blank form for Closed Session. Memorandum from
City Attorney Charles S. Vose dated December 7, 1989.
Action: Receive and File.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting
the objection of Midstokke.
12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
(a)
(b)
City Council reorganization - Committee assignments.
Memorandum from Deputy City Clerk Linda Riddle dated
December 6, 1989.
Action: To approve staff recommendation by approving
the attached lists of delegates to the various commit—
tees as recommended by the Mayor.
Motion Midstokke, second Sheldon. So ordered.
Further Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5335, enti-
tled, "A RESOLUTION APPOINTING A MEMBER OF SAID COUNCIL
OF SAID CITY TO THE CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO
PART 3 OF DIVISION 10 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE."
Motion Midstokke, second Sheldon. So ordered.
Final Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5336 entitled,
"A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 89-5256, CHANGING
THE CITY'S REPRESENTATIVE TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE INDEPENDENT CITIES LEASE FINANCE AUTHORITY."
Motion Midstokke, second Sheldon. So ordered.
Scheduling of joint meeting with Planning Commission.
Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated
December 7, 1989.
Action: To set meeting date for February 15, 1990.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
Scheduling of continued Goals Setting Meeting tentative-
ly set for February 22, 1990.
Chamber of Commerce has invited Council and Staff to a
joint meeting to be held on January 19-20.
13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
(a) Request by Councilmember Midstokke for discussion of
allowable uses in the open space zones. Supplemental
- 7 -
Minutes 12-12-89
(b)
(c)
(d)
memo from Planning Director Michael Schubach, dated De-
cember 4, 1989.
Action: To continue to next meeting on January 9, 1990.
Motion Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered.
Request by Councilmember Midstokke for discussion of
rezoning and disposition of the Biltmore site. A Supp-
lemental appraisal report from Michael J. Vizzini
Associates, Redondo Beach, dated June 15, 1988.
Action: To continue to next meeting on January 9, 1990
Motion Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered.
Request by former Mayor June Williams for discussion of
requiring Conditional Use Permit for new commercial
developments such as hotels. (Continued from 11/14/89
meeting.)
Action: To continue to next meeting on January 9, 1990.
Motion Wiemans, second Sheldon. So ordered.
Request by Councilmember Sheldon for discussion regard-
ing zoning standards in residential zones, i.e., lot
coverage, parking, setbacks, etc.; and height limit,
setbacks, parking and bulk in commercial zones.
(Continued from 11/14/89 meeting.)
Action: To continue to next meeting on January 9, 1990.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton.
CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place
Parker Herriott - 222 Twenty-fourth Street
ADJOURNMENT
The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California adjourned in memory of Chuck Toole, a Hermosa
Beach resident for 28 years who passed away on November 27, 1989.
The meeting adjourned on Tuesday, December 12, 1989, at the hour
of 11:24 P.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, January
9, 1990 at the hour of 7:30 P.M.
Ch Clerk
- 8 - Minutes 12-12-89
(9/yo
CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS
MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY
OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M.
CLOSED FRIDAYS
Where there is no vision the people perish...
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are
participating in the process of representative government. Your
government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the
City Council meetings often.
It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new
items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by
the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have
all matters covered within the time allowed.
,CITY VISION
A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile,
financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct
business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded
full municipal services in which the maximum costs are -borne by
visitor/users; led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship
role for community resources and displays a willingness to
explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy
leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council
is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa
Beach for tomorrow's challenges today.
Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986
. NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers
THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT
Hermosa Beach bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap-
pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The
Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through
the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration
is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in:the
United States today.
GLOSSARY
•
The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen-
das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council.
Consent Items
A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re-
quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this
listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal-
endar items Removed For Separate Discussion.
Public Hearings
Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford
the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the
matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior
to the Hearing.
Hearings
Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal
requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing.
Ordinances
An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All
ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into
the records. At least one week later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the
ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the
second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive
the time requirements.
Written Communications
The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally
communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed
with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports City Manager
The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention
of, or for action by the City Council.
Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda,
usually having arisen since. the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council
Members of the City Council may place items on .the agenda for consideration by the
full Council.
Other Matters - City Council •
These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication
of the Agenda.
Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature
Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con-
sidered on the agenda may do so at this time.
Parking Authority
The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte-
gral part of the City government.
Vehicle Parking District No. 1
The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur-
pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro-
mote public parking in the central business district.
- i -.. ._ • ._ ._........
RECAP OF DONATIONS TO THE CITY
POLICE K-9 PROGRAM
Learned Lumber $1,200
Los Angeles County Lifeguard Association 100
Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association 1,000
Knights of Columbus (Manhattan Beach) 1,000
Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce 1,000
Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club 1,000
Michael P D'Amico 100
Wilma A. Burt 50
Normand and Carol Brewer 25
Olguin & Rutherford Development Corporation 100
Matthew D. Cruse 100
C. F. Bergesch Construction Company 500
Sandpipers Philanthrophy 2,000
Olympic Auto Center 200
Triangle Hardware 100
Michael and Patricia Roth 200
Granitize Products, Inc. 250
Autocraft of Torrance 1,633
Burk M. Bussiere 100
John and Mary Ellen Workman 100
Rob Putz 10
Anonymous 10
Hermosa Beach Rotary Club 500
Miscellaneous cash donations 150
TOTAL CASH DONATIONS
Expenses for the K-9 program to date
$11,428
($7,061)
Remaining funds for the program $4,367
Medical care for the K-9 is being donated free of charge by
the Alondra Animal Hospital in Gardena
POLICE D.A.R.E. PROGRAM
Cash Contributions received to date $5,292
Expenses for the DARE program to date ($4,726)
Remaining funds for the program $566
POLICE DEPARTMENT
New badges were designed and purchased for the Police Officers by Reserve Police
Officer Jack Berkus. This donation is valued at over $5,800.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Betty Martin donated two sidewalk sweepers and a trailer to the Public Works
department.
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF. THE CITY COUNCIL of
the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on December 9, 1989,
at the hour of 12:04 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Essertier
ROLL CALL
Present: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton
SCHEDULING OF JOINT MEETING WITH HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL
DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES.
The meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, December 12, 1990 at
4:00 P.M. and at 5:30 P.M. the City Clerk Applicants will be
interviewed prior to the Regular Meeting at 7:30 P.M.
REVIEW OF CITY GOALS
1. Agreement on Process
a) The goals were listed on a flipchart by Mr.
Blackwood assisted by Mr. Northcraft.
b) The speaking order was clockwise starting with
the Mayor.
2. Ground Rules
a) Be as open, free and spontaneous, with no
interruptions by colleagues.
3. Brainstorming of Ideas
a) After they were listed on the flipchart, the
Councilmembers made suggestions, add-ons,
elimination, etc.
City Manager, Northcraft explained to the audience that the
intent of the Goals Meeting is for all five members to throw out
ideas and possible suggestions to staff and directions the City
should be heading in the next 1-3 years. During the throwing out
of ideas there is to be a brief discussion on each, butnot an
argument pro or con. The Goals list will then be critiqued,
refined, evaluated. Then each goal listed will be left on or
eliminated from the list, as the Council decides.
At this time all goals were listed on the flipchart.
The Meeting recessed at 12:55 P.M.
The Meeting reconvened at 1:05 P.M.
The Goals list was reviewed, refined and some items eliminated.
The Meeting recessed at 2:15 P.M.
The Meeting reconvened at 2:30 P.M.
Minutes 12-9-89
The Goals list was further reviewed, refined and the following is
the final list, not prioritized:
1. IMPROVE CITY FINANCIAL PICTURE
A. Generate more finds for needed improvement
B. Increase audit procedures for telephone usage
2. ENHANCE COMMUNICATION WITH PUBLIC
A. Establish Direct Switchboard
B. Improve employees' public relations
C. Publish future agenda items schedule
3. RESTORE SENSE OF COMMUNITY
A. Improve image of Hermosa Beach
B. More community events
C. New enforcement policy for Parking Enforcement and
Animal Control (issue warning if violator is present)
D. Better maintenance of beach bathrooms
4. REVIEW INCREASING POLICE FOOT PATROL DOWNTOWN
5. COMPLETE NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHOOL DISTRICT (South School
property and Prospect Heights)
6. UPGRADE DOWNTOWN
A. Active campaign to clean-up downtown
B. Implement use - change parking policy
C. Incentives for Downtown businesses for facade changes
D. Consider closing off Pier Head (Hermosa to Pier) for
pedestrian mall
E. Look at re-establishing Vehicle Parking District as
separate body and returning Lot A, B, and C to
Parking District
F. Improve property maintenance for Downtown businesses
G. City Council to take more active role with Chamber
H. Review of Fiesta as to benefit to City versus dollars
expended
I. Do something "interesting" with the Pier
7. REVIEW AUDIT SYSTEM FOR COLLECTION ON PARKING LOTS.
8. BILTMORE SITE RESOLVED AT COUNCIL LEVEL
9. IMPROVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING PROCEDURES
A. Provide more opportunity for public to speak
B. Provide better access to agenda packet
C. Less chat from City Council Members
D. Better use of Cable access
a. Replay of meetings
b. Display agenda
10. ACCELERATE INFRASTURCTURE IMPROVEMENT
A. Analyze more timely completion of sewer upgrade
B. Analyze service level of street cleaning in City
(toward increasing)
C. Review need'for 4 hr. No Parking restriction for
sweeper.
D. General upgrade of water lines and fire hydrants
E. Review adequacy of street lighting based upon
complaints
- 2 - Minutes 12-9-89
0.44
�_ ��.
11. REGULAR, EQUAL AND STRICT ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS AND CUPS
A. Fire Department to include inspection of CUPs during
Fire Code inspections
B. Establish City liaison with Restaurant Association
12. IMPROVE QUALITY OF LIFE
A. City beautification (trash enclosures)
13. IMPROVE STAFF ATTITUDE AND MORALE
A. More social functions between Council and Staff
B. Increase accountability of Staff
14. CHANGE BUDGET TO MAKE MORE UNDERSTANDABLE TO GENERAL
PUBLIC
A. Clarify goals of CIP
15. IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF OPERATIONS
A. Increase service level of employees without
increasing staff (compare to other Cities)
B. Computerize payroll and personnel function
C. Increase usefulness and reduce cost of Hermosa
Beach computer system
D. Review cutting cost of Parking Enforcement and impact
of implementation
E. Review integrating Police Department Records Manage-
ment and Computer Operations with City computer
operations
F. Reduce delay in Building Department
G. Analysis of contracting Police, Fire, Animal Control,
Parking Enforcement, and Park maintenance functions.
Analysis by Building of costs of consultants versus
in-house plan check
I. Review 4/10 schedule for City Hall
16. COMPLETE REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ZONING
STANDARDS
A. Review 17' setback
B. Review lot coverage
C. Review parking requirements
D. Review open space standards
E. Review setback and height requirements
F. Establish review procedure for large projects
G. Provide incentive for renovation
H. Encourage upgrading of existing residences
I. Two -unit limit in R-2
J. Tree preservation
17. IMPROVE USEFULNESS OF COMMUNITY CENTER
A. City Council Policy regarding priority of leasing
B. Explore possibility of using space for City Hall
essential services
C. Regular review of theatre uses and income
D. Update financial analysis of Community Center
- 3 - Minutes 12-9-89
. . •
18. IMPROVE POLICE OPERATIONS BY MONITORING PERFORMANCE AND
INCREASING ACCOUNTABILITY
A. Establish productivity criteria for Police Department
B. Civilian enforcement officers
C. Look at L.A.P.D. performance review procedures
19. CREATE INNOVATIVE METHOD FOR RECYCLING TRASH
20. COMPLETE NEGOTIATIONS WITH MAC PHERSON OIL
A. Speed up E.I.R._on oil lease
B. Public vote designation of oil revenue restricted to
Open Space
C. Expand and explore uses of off -shore oil monies
21. IMPROVE BUSINESS RELATIONS AND REVENUE
22. INVOLVE SCHOOL DISTRICT EARLY IN ANY PROJECT THAT
INVOLVES THEM
23. NEW GENERAL PLAN
24. LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION TIED TO DEFICIENCY OF
INFRASTRUCTURE
25. COMPLETE COASTAL PERMIT PLAN
26. EXPLORE SENIOR CITIZEN NEEDS
The Meeting recessed at 4:15 P.M.
The Meeting reconvened at 4:30 P.M.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street
Steve Reed - 429 Thirty-first Street
Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place
Bill Hendrick - 237 Thirty-first Street
Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste
The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California, adjourned on Saturday, December 9, 1989, at
the hour of 5:55 P.M.
•
CMie DeputA6,41.&
y City Clerk
4 - Minutes 12
- 9-89
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA
BEACH AND THE HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT held on December 12,
1990 at the hour of 4:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mary Lou Weiss, President
ROLL CALL
CITY COUNCIL:
Present: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton
Absent: None
SCHOOL BOARD:
Present: Gonzales, Kelsey, Mark, Meyer, Tattu, Weiss and Shallee
Cunningham, Principal/Administrator
Absent None
Introductions were made of new Councilmembers and Board members.
THE STATUS OF NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT
REGARDING PROSPECT HEIGHTS AND SOUTH SCHOOL
City Manager, Northcraft made comments regarding the history of
negotiations.
Points of Agreement: 1) .City Council and School District
issued a joint news release reflecting a point of agreement
that the School Board was willing to sell the two sites and
the City was willing to buy. 2) Willingness of City to pay
cash and to have a close closing date. 3) To agree on deed
restrictions contained in offer by School Board. 4) A
willingness to work on other issues that might benefit the
School District and City, thereby benefiting the citizens.
Shalee Cunningham commented that some of the following items had
not been thoroughly discussed, nor any written communication
between the City and School Board.
Points of Disagreement: 1) Difference in appraisal prices.
2) School District need for gymnasium. 3) Shared mainten-
ance cost for schools.
President Weiss gave background information on Prospect Heights
property, which is 5 lots. School Board had an appraisal done
this year which indicated the appraised value is $375,000.00.
The City's most recent offer was $250,000.00 cash.
There was Council discussion regarding a closed meeting to
further the knowledge of the new Councilmembers.
Action: To take the matter up in closed session.
Motion Wiemans, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the
objection of Midstokke.
The meeting recessed at 4:40 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 5:04 P.M.
- 1 -
Special Meeting Minutes 12-12-
._ e.....a._....3a_,.. .. _ �..._._-.a .v"._ ..± w, �._s.e.__si:.x.:c�n .....,:sa9:ry a�—....mak
Councilmember Sheldon presented the following offer on behalf of
the City:
$2,200,000 cash with add-ons to satisfy the School District
needs and meet the present appraisal held by the School
District for South School.
Action: The Hermosa Beach School District Board of Trustees
rejected the offer made by the City.
Motion Tattu, second Mark. So ordered
The Hermosa Beach School District Board of Trustees made the
following Counteroffer:
Action: $2,875,000.000 for South School and $250,000.00 for
Prospect Property.
Motion Gonzales, second Tattu. So ordered, noting the
objections of Mark and Weiss.
The City Council initiated the following:
Action: To reject the School District offer.
Motion Sheldon, second Essertier.
AYES: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor
Creighton.
NOES: None
CITIZEN COMMENTS - None
The City Council:
Action: To recess their portion of the meeting for fifteen
minutes.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
The School Board:
Action: To adjourn their portion of the meeting.
Motion Weiss, second Kelsey. So ordered.
The meeting recessed at 5:25 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 5:40 P.M.
The meeting was called to order to discuss the applicants for
City Clerk.
Action: To accept the five applications for City Clerk.
Motion Sheldon, second Midstokke. So ordered.
Further Action: To interview the applicants one at a time. .
Motion Sheldon, second Essertier. So ordered.
- 2 - Special Meeting Minutes 12-12-89
The five applicants interviewed were:
Merna Marshall
Sherie L. Nelson
Marilyn Pierce
Elaine Doerfling
David MacCormick
- 260 Thirty-third Place
- 49 Eighteenth Street
- 707 Pacific Coast Highway #412
- 1011 Second Street
- 1204 Monterey
The Council acted as follows:
Proposed Action: To postpone decision until a future
meeting.
Motion Essertier. Dies for lack of second.
Further Proposed Action: To nominate Merna Marshall for the
City Clerk position.
Motion Wiemans, second Essertier. So ordered.
Further Proposed Action: To nominate Elaine Doerfling for
the City Clerk position.
Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered.
Final Action: To close nominations.
Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered.
The vote was as follows:
Elaine Doerfling - Creighton, Midstokke, Sheldon.
Merna Marshall - Wiemans, Essertier.
Action: To unanimously appoint Elaine Doerfling as City
Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach.
Motion Essertier, second Midstokke. So ordered.
Final Action: To adjourn the meeting.
Motion Essertier, second Midstokke.
The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, December 12, 1989, at
the hour of 6:05 P.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday,
December 12, 1989 at the hour of 7:30 P.M., preceded by a Closed
Executive Session.
C ief Deputy City Clerk
- 3 - Special Meeting Minutes 12-12-89
w•3*.
4'5'
IzY
I
4
2
FINANCE-SFA340 .,. DEMAND LISTVy^
°
PAGE 0001
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
' DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
H BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 001-400-1212-4188 01574 $72.69
00055 32034
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 00 01103/90
H BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 145-400-3401-4188 00794 $0.69
00055 32034
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$• •• • • -•
H BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 145-400-3402-4188 00796 ' $0.27
00055 32034
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$.0.09_01/0 -•
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $73.65
H BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 001-400-1212-4188 01573 $13,908.88
00056 32033
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$Q 01./03 -•
H BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 110-400-3302-4188 01065 $677.06
-DO
00056 32033
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00 01/03/90
H BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 145-400-3401-4188 00793 $17.08
00056 32033
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
10.1 -•
H BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 145-400-3402-4188 00795 $6.83
_Q.1L•
00056 32033
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$n on nun'i/17n
H BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 705-400-1209-4188 00169 $125.42
00056 32033
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 00 01103/9.
H BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 705-400-1217-4188 00168 $236.93
00056 32033
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $14,972.20
H CA STATE UNIV DOMINGUEZ HILLS 00412 001-400-1202-4316 00275 $242.50
09269 32032
TUITION/V. MOHLER 12/07/89 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING
$0.00 01/03/90
H CA STATE UNIV DOMINGUEZ HILLS 4 00412 001-400-1207-4316 00039 $242.50
09269 32032
TUITION/S. LAWRENCE 12/07/89 RIIS LICENSE /TRAINING
S. •• • • -•
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $485.00
`
r
H GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 001-400-1212-4188 01576 $1,890.21
00001 32036
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
40 00 01/03/90
7
QI►
2
3
4
6
7 •
e
•
10
11
13
14
16 •
•
17
,6
1•
20
21
22
z3
24
26
26
27
6 .
6
7
c r
2
5
66
67 �
6
•
Y
0
2
4
•
1
'a
at'
4,
42
43
44
45
46
47
4e
49
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:25:43
^
.
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0002
DATE 01/04/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME
VND A ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 3t AMOUNT INV/REF
PO A
CHK it
DESCRIPTION
DATE INVC PROJ #t ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT UNENC
DATE EXP
H
GUARDIAN DENTAL
. 02623
105-400-2601-4188° 00859
$4.20
00001
32036
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
5TREELLI_GH.TING /EMPLOYEE_BENEEITS
An On
01/03/90
H
GUARDIAN DENTAL
02623
110-400-3302-4188 01067
$104.73
00001
32036
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
PARKING ENF
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITR
$0 00
01/0'7/90
H
GUARDIAN DENTAL
02623
145-400-3401-4188 00796
$2.22
00001
32036
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
DIAL A RIDE
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
'$O 00
O1Ln3/90
H
GUARDIAN DENTAL
02623
145-400-3402-4188 00798
$1.14
00001
32036
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
ESEA
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
bo 00
01/0:7/9n
H
GUARDIAN DENTAL
02623
145-400-3403-4188 00210
$3.43
00001
32036
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
j2/1.1.a9
BUS_PASE_SUBSDY
/EMPLOYEE BENFFITR
$0 00
01/03190_
H
GUARDIAN DENTAL
02623
160-400-3102-4188 00801
$27.30
00001
32036
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
SEWER/ST DRAIN
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$O 00
01/07/90
H
GUARDIAN DENTAL
02623
705-400-1209-4188 00170
$28.66
00001
32036
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
LIABILITY INS
/EMPLQYE BENEFITS
$0.90_91/93/90
H
GUARDIAN DENTAL
02623
705-400-1217-4188 00169
$33.91
00001
32036
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
WORKERS COMP
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.095.80
H
HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
00243
001-202-0000-2030 00316
$211,476.75
31924
SALARIES/11-16 TO 11-30
12/04/89
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
$0.00
01/03/90
H
HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
00243
001-202-0000-2030 00317
$249,788.98
32043
SALARIES/12-1 TO 12-15
12/19/89
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
$0.00
01/03/90
H
HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
00243
001-202-0000-2030 00318
$1,210.68
32046
SALARY ADJ/12-1 TO 12-15
12/20/89
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
$0.00
01/03/90
H
HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT.
00243 ,.
105-202-0000-2030 00175
$6,926.83
31924
SALARIES/11-16 TO 11-30
12/04/89
/ACCRED PAYROLL
$0.00
01/93/90
H
HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
00243
110-202-0000-2030 00176
$49,096.35
31924
SALARIES/11-16 TO 11-30
12/04/89
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
$0 00
01/03/90
•
H
HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
00243
145-202-0000-2030' 00171
$1,849.18
31924
SALARIES/11-16 TO 11-30
12/04/89
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
$0 00
01/03/90
A.m. 1,4,.W �. ' b.
J
.J
4
5
7
9
10
11
12
14
IS .J
IS
17
1e
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2
2 .1
2
2
31
3.
3
3
3
3
3-
3- .
4
41
4
4
45
4.
4
4
4
52
5
64
33
6
5
..l
58
30 1.%
63
e
70
2
3
4
e
�:.
3
r
°
°
2
°
v..r� nc na.n
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
,
PAGE 0003
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 155-202-0000-2030 00172 $3.969.00
31924
SALARIES/11-16 TO 11-30 12/04/89 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
$0 00 01/03/_91)
2
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 160-202-0000-2030 00170 $8.359.85
31924
SALARIES/11-16 TO 11-30 12/04/89 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
$0.00 01/03/90
'
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 170-202-0000-2030 00026 $13.796.16
31924
SALARIES/11-16 TO 11-30 12/04/89 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
$0.OQ_O1/Q3/9Q
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 705-202-0000-2030 00133 $7.816.24
31924
SALARIES/11-16 TO 11-30 12/04/89 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
$0.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***************war***•**********•***•ic****#•it*************+t************* $554.290.02
H COMMANDER MICHAEL*LAVIN 00792 001-400-2101-4317 00144 $227.50
10188 32038
REIMB TUITION/SPRING 90 12/11/89 POLICE /CONFERENCE EXPENSE
$0 00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $227.50
H ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 001-400-1212-4188 01575 *1.323.61
00019 32035
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 00 01/03/90
H ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 105-400-2601-4188 00858 $67.12
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12L.1.1/89 9IBEEI_L.IGa'LING /EMPLOYEE BENFFITS
00019 32035
$0_0Q___01/01/90H
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 110-400-3301-4188 00817 $1.44
00019 32035
.
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0_OO 01/03/90
H ORAL HEALTH SERVICES • 00235 110-400-3302-4188 01066 $328.01
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 BLSING ENF /FMPl fYFFJENFFITS
PA
00019 32035
$0_00 01/01/90
!
H ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 145-400-3401-4188 00795 $7.54
00019 32035
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 DIAL A RIDE__ LEh1P1 OYFE BENEFITS
$0 00 01/03/90
H ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 145-400-3402-4188 00797 $2.45
00019 32035
CITY HEALTH INS/_DEC 89 12/11/89 ESEA /EMPI OYES BENEFITS
$0.._.Q0_0.1/03/9n
H ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 155-400-2102-4188 00445 $5.21
00019 32035
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89 12/11/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLQ�(EE BENEFITS
$0 00 01/03/90
H ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 160-400-3102-4188 00800 $44.53
CITY HEA . . ' : 1:_ ''0
00019 32035
00 0110//90
- . . . D .
7
•7
•
7
n
a
9
2
2
7
31
3
33
35
37
35
39
40
41
42
44
47
4
4
5
51
52
5
55
55
G,
3
4
5
7*
D
Io
II r
12
14
15 *
15
17
15
ID*
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
2
3
3. 5$
3
3•
47
1 •
2
3
4
5•
7
9
2
3
15
•
57 II
e
0
I •
2
4
5
•
CITY OF
FINANCE—SFA34O
TIME 15:25:43
..
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0004
DATE 01/04/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
***
VENDOR TOTAL*******4*********************************************************4** ' *1.779.91
•
H
PACIFICARE
00575
001-400-1212-4188 01577
$16,699.69
00016
32037
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
EMP BENEFITS
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0,00_91/03/90
H
PACIFICARE
00575
105-400-2601-4188 00860 $709.52
00016 32037
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
STREET LIGHTING
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$02_00_01/03/90
H
PACIFICARE
00575
110-400-3301-4188 00818
$12.04
00016 32037
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
VEH PKG DIST
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 00
01/03/90
H
PACIFICARE
00575
110-400-3302-4188 01068
$2,828.91
00016
32037
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
EARK_IMQ NF
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 00
01103L9
H
PACIFICARE
00575
145-400-3401-4188 00797
$82.50
00016
32037
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
DIAL A RIDE
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 00
01/03/90
H
PACIFICARE
00575
145-400-3402-4188 00799
$27.46
00016
32037
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
ESEA
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 On
01/03/90
H
PACIFICARE
00575
145-400-3403-4188 00211 $7.22
00016
32037
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
o1/n'i/9n
H
PACIFICARE
00575
155-400-2102-4188 00446
$48.06
00016
32037
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
CROSSING QUURP
(EMPLOY $_BENEFITS
$Q�00
01/03/90
H
PACIFICARE
00575
160-400-3102-4188 00802
$325.06
00016
32037
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
SEWER/ST DRAIN
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/03/90
H
PACIFICARE
00575
705-400-1209-4188 00171
$87.50
00016
32037
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
LABILITY INS
/EMPLOYEE_IiENEFITS
$Q-00
01/03/90
H
PACIFICARE
00575
705-400-1217-4188 00170
$87.50
00016
32037
CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 89
12/11/89
WORKERS COMP
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/03/90
***
VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20,915.46
H
PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
00026
001-400-1213-4180 00352
$69,330.17
32039
RETIREMENT ADVANCE/NOV89
12/11/89
RETIREMENT
/RETIREMENT
$0.00
01/03/90
H
PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
00026
001-400-1213-4180 00353 '
$87,276.78
32047
RETIREMENT/NOV 89
12/21/89
-. ;r k.
;_ ; r k
$0.00
01/03/90
2
3
4
•
1e
10
20
23
24
25
26
27
2
2
31
3
4
4
47
4
4
5
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
78
50
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
87
60
60
70
71
72
73
74
75
7
-� S
i
2
3
1 '
6
7
5. a 1 3 ur r1c[11-IUA I7tA1F1
FINANCE—SFA340 .. DEMAND LIST PAGE 0005
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90 ,DATE 01/04/90
i1
a
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC - PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
a
•
1 6
4
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00354 $69,330.17CR 32047
RETIREMENT/NOV 89 12/21/89
•
,c
"
12
1317
RETIREMENT /REfREMENT $0-00 01103L90
12
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00355 $16,237.83CR 32047
RETIREMENT/NOV 89 12/21/89 RETIREMENT !RETIREMENT $O 00
'3
14
16
114
"
16
1t7
10
14
01/03/90
•
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00112 " $1,010.59 32047
RETIREMENT/NOV 89 12L21/89 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT
16
,o
$0 nn 01!03/90
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 110-400-3301-4180 00113 *51.54 32047
RETIREMENT/NOV 89 12/21/89 VEH PKG DIST /RETIREMENT $0 00
20
21
232
1�O
71
(3
01/03/90
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00112 $5,282.30 32047
RETIREMENT/NOV 89 12/21/89
24
25
27
PARKING_ENF /RETIREMENT $0-00 0 LL03L40
260
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 145-400-3401-4180 00086 $151.54 32047
RETIREMENT/NOV 89 12/21/89 DIAL A RIDE /RETIREMENT
24
„
5
1'6
77
$O 00 01/03/90
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 145-400-3402-4180 00086 $55.01 32047
RETIREMENT/NOV 89 12/21/89
32
33
75
78
7'
70
EEA /R TIRFMENT $n 00 01/03/90
36
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 145-400-3403-4180 00035 $18.423203
RETIREMENT/NOV 89 12/21/89 BUS PASS SUBSQY /RETIREMENT 00
37
30
3oI
31
,12
7
334
3'
J6
$0 01/03// 90
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00084 $100.3542
32047
RETIREMENT/NOV 89 12/21/89
4°
GROSSINS_OSJARD /RETIREMENT *0.10_OjL03L90
4454
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00111 $1,003.16 32047
RETIREMENT/NOV 89 12/21/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /RETIREMENT 4A 00
37
38
39
01/03/90
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00035 $212.83 32047
RETIREMENT/NOV 89 12/21/89
46
49
sol
10
4'
42
LIABILITY INS /RETIREMENT *0 00 01/03/90
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00035 $276.2564
RETIREMENT/NCV 89 12/21/89 WORKERS COMP /RETIREMENT $0 00
52
53
ll
56
44
15
01/047 03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $79,200.94
573
eG4
46
.17
46
SECRETARY OF STATE 03201 001-400-1131-4201 00532 $25.00 09137 32041
LATE FILE FEE/FORM 635 12/12/89 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0
60
61
662
3
64
4•
50
51
00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** .$25.00
65
674
68
57
s3
34
H SHERIFF'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION 03202 001-400-2101-4187 00303 $77.02 10194 32048
TRAINING UNIF/S. TANABE 12/28/89 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $0.00
69
7I
55
-6
, 01/03/90
72
73
74
lo
•
•
0
0
0
•
•
y
r
M
3
:3
14
15
3
31
32
33
31
.15
36
37
30
30
0
FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LISTry
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0006
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT INV/REF PO $
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 4* ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK it
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $77.02
H J.M.*SPEICH SEMINARS 03043 001-400-4201-4316 00169 $110.00
REG/W. GROVE/C. WILLIAMS 12/18/89 BUILDING /TRAINING
10812
$0.00
32042
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $110.00
H STEVE*WISNIEWSKI 01364 170-400-2103-4322 00009 $1,400.00
SPEC INVESTIGATION, FUNDS 12/12/89 SPEC INVESTGTNS /UNCLASSIFIED
10189
$0.00
10192
*0 00_011.03L20_____,
32040
01/03/90
32044
32045
01/03/90
H STEVE*WISNIEWSKI 01364 170-400-2103-4322 00010 $1,400.00
SPEC INVESTIGATION FUNDS 12/19/89 SPEC_INVESIGINS_LUNCLASBIEIEA
H STEVE*WISNIEWSKI 01364 170-400-2103-4322 00011 $13,600.00
SPEC INVESTIGATION FUNDS 12/20/89 SPEC INVESTGTNS /UNCLASSIFIED
10186
$0 00
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $16.400.00
*** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $690,652.50
R A & E TROPHIES 02744 001-400-1203-4305 00244 $41.85
MISC CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 PERSONNEL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
01171
$0.00
32053
01/09/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $41.85
R A-1 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 02180 001-400-2101-4305 01140 $149.19 110139-0
SHREDDER WASTEBAGS 139-0 12/04/89 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUePLIES
10177
$14R.R4
32054
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $149.19
R ADLER VIDEO 03185 001-400-4204-4321 00476 $159.06 6126
SECURITY CAMERAS/PIER 6126 12/19/89 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT
10077
*158 69
32055
01/03/90
*s* VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $159.06
R ADVANCE ELEVATOR 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00347 $80.00 22701
ELEVATOR MAINT/DEC 89 22701 12/01/89 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
00003
*0 00
32056
01/09/90
j
1e
1O
20
21
22
23
31
n
31
3i
4C
41
4
4
4
4
4
46
'5
51
5
5
5
55
7
'
3
5.4 1 r ur nanr1U M tltAGN
-FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LISTi•2 TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90 DATE
DATE
0007
01/04/90
,
4
5
4
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
7
'y
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***********x*ir*a+r*+►**grit**Nutt***natx*a**utak****max*******sia*
,. $90.00
•
9
10
11
0
2
R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 00935 001-400-2101-4201 00503 $1,061.20 2514 00070
RADIO MAINT/POLICE/DEC89 2514 12/01/89 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00
32057
01/04/90
12
1,
114
5
16
R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 00935 001-400-2201-4201 00109 ' $265.30 2514 00070
RADIO MAINT/POLICE/DEC89 2514 12/01/89 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT '$0.00
32057
01/04/90
32057
01/04/90
16
17
16
to
20
21
22
z4
6
R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 00935 110-400-3302-4307 00007 $305.50 2515 00073
RADIO MAINT/DEC 89 2515 11/30/89 PARKING ENF /RADIO MAINTENANCE #0.00
°
*** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************apt***** •*********** $1.632.00
24
25
25
27'
2g
2V
,o
,
3
,51
,e
]7
39 J0
4d411
4z
43
R SCOTT*ALDEN 03155 001-210-0000-2110 03448 $50.00 85496 09894
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 85496 12/18/8931
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00
32058
01/04/90
6
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00
..
R SUSAN*ALLEN 03193 001-210-0000-2110 03450 $50.00 49059 09892
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 49059 12/18/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00
32059
01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00
R AMER ASSOC FOR STATE & LOCAL 02987 001-400-1131-4305 00117 $35.71 130796 09310
MANUALS/CITY CLERK 30796 10/05/89 CITY ATTORNEY /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $48.70
32060
01/03/90
46
47 1
46
4d
e°.
1
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $35.71
R AMERICAN SOC OF CIVIL ENG. 02317 001-400-4202-4305 00445 $130.50 10096
PUBLICATIONS/PUB. WORKS 12/18/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPEL.IES $0
32061
52
53
554
6
66
00
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $130.50
01/03/90
67
591
6o
R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 00731 $103.00 00113
MISC CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00
32062
01/04/90
61
62
6,t
64
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** , $103.00
65
666
71
6e
R APOLLO LEASING COMPANY LTD 02558 001-400-3104-69004. 00030 $841.29 00066
LEASE PMT/JANUARY 1990 12/26/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS $0'.00
32063
01/03/90
69
70
71
72
n
74
7
!'.7 • "•� 7,17:17,777, f., 'ry�jj �'""�1w, •;"1�'"- ..SFr.• 11T 77. : i'+ 7-711 F
4116
115.
•
Fri
•
•
zc
3
31
32
33
34
3c
3C
41
42
4,
44
FINANCE-SFA34O,, DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0008
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 5 AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION:, DATE INVC PROJ A ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO $ CHK $
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 8041.29
•
R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-2201-4309 00784 $32.50
UTILITY RAGS/NOV 89 11/30/89 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00017 32064
$0 00 01/04/90
00017 32064
80 00-01104/90
R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-3104-4309 00372 $8.90
UTILITY RAGS/NOV 89 11/30/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTEN NcE_MAIERIALS
5
R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-4204-4309 01516 8117.21
UTILITY RAGS/NOV 89 11/30/89 BLDG A NT /M •A► r: . .
00017 32064
$000 01/04/90
.N
R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-4205-4309 00426 $23.55
UTILITY RAGS/NOV 89 11/30/89- EQUIP SERVICE /MAGI NANCE_MAIERIALS
00017 32064
80 00 01/04120
R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 110-400-3302-4309 00623 $11.73
UTILITY RAGS/NOV 89 11/30/89 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIAL$
00017 32064
$0 00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $193.89
R ASPA 00953 001-400-1202-4315 00042 $75.00
DUES/V. COPELAND 12/28/89 FINANCE ADMIN /MEMBERSHIP
09281 32065
$0.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $75.00
R ASPLUNDH 00487 105-400-2601-4311 00156 $616.46
YRLY INSP/ST. LITE TRUCK 06758 12/19/89 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE
06758
09492 32066
$607.15 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $616.46
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY 00407 001-400-2101-4305 01143 $25.62
MISC. CHARGES/NOV-DEC 89 12/15/89 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
00115 32067
$0.00 01/04/90
R ' AVIATION LOCK & KEY 00407 001-400-2101-4306 00733 $5.34
MISC. CHARGES/NOV-DEC 89 12/15/89 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE
-
7427
.
-
00115 32067
80-00 01/04/90
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY Q0407 001-400-4204-4309 01511 8394.24
PUSH BAR/POLICE DEPT 7427 12/14/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
09473 32067
$393.56 01/03/90
00115 32067
$0.00 01/04/90
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY - 00407 001-400-4204-4309 01517 $172.77
MISC. CHARGES/NOV-DEC 89 12/15/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
43
44
4
45
46
IAF 47
40
vv
FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST ----
TIME 15:25:43 "' FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0009
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $597.97
1
R B & L CRANE SERVICE 02442 160-400-3102-4309 00432 $110.00
CRANE SERV/SEWER PUMP 12/11/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
10084 32068
$110.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $110.00
R BANC ONE LEASING 99 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00048 $417.96
LEASE PMT/JANUARY 1990 12/26/89 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS
00054 32069
$0.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $417.96
R BANK OF AMERICA 00180 001-400-1203-4201 00625 $58.17
NOV EXP/R. BLACKWOOD 11/30/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
09766 32070
$0.00 01/03/90
R BANK OF AMERICA 00180 001-400-2101-4316 00488 $24.64
NOV EXP/S. WISNIEWSKI 11/30/89 POLICE /TRAINING
10702 32070
$0-001_QILI3/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $82.81
R BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC. 01889 001-400-4204-4309 01510 $596.85
EMERG REPAIR/CITY YARD 7017 11j06L09 BLP J1AINT /MAINIENANCE-MATERIALS
7017
10081 32071
$0_oq 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $596.85
R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 001-400-2101-4305 01142 $40.15
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 11L00189 POLICE /OFFICE QPM SUPPLIES
01149 32072
$0.00 01/04/90
01149 32072
$0.00 01/04/90
01149 32072
$0_00 01L04/90
01149 32072
$0.00 01/04/90
. ,
1
R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 001-400-2201-4305 00316 $12.05
MISC. CHARGES/NOV e9 11/30/89 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 001-400-4201-4305 00505 $105.96
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 09 11L3Q/B9 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 001-400-4202-4305 00446 $10.16
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 PUB WKS_ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
'
R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY` ' 02509 001-400-4205-4309 00424 $9.84
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
01149 32072
$0.00 01/04/90
1
7
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
i0
n J
2
14
5
5
7
5
9
0
1
22
25
7 J
4
5 .,
9
2
3
5
66
7
9
9
44
I
5 J
Vit111 1'a•„Y-�. . ice r.'I ;T. I 7Q' h'" li.'.7, ::, •;17 f.7• -,',:.: t
uti
1
L. i 1 7 ur 1'7tNYfUbA UtP.L H
FINANCE—SFA340
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0010
1\
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90 DATE 01/04/90
2
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
7
R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 001-400-4601-4305 00771 4*19.60 01149 32072
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00__01/04/.90.
11
1
_
I.2
R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 110-400-3302-4305 00633 $52.70
14
•
01149 32072
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $ o,Qc�oicQ4l90
;a
,7
i4
4641.* VENDOR TOTAL •�tat•tfaaq•atu•tt*•u•x••ltat*a•at+t*�t•l ****#x•�tat#***#+t•q•it*+tit••p••tr�tat�t••x�••lt•>Eaaataatit�t•p*stat*•q�aatit•>t•*u•lt $250. 46
1e
S
,G
16
20
21
.i7
R BEAR SALES & SERVICE, INC. 00430 001-400-4205-4309 00423 $95.00
22
277440 10091 32073
REPAIR ENGINE ANALYZER 77440 12/12/89 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
23
=+
10
$95.00 01/03/90
2
_•
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $95.00
26
'
27
73
20
29
R CAROL*BELSER 02896 001-400-4601-4308 00239 $36.86
30
10404 32074
CHRISTMAS ACTIVITY SUPP. 12/19/89 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00 O1 2L20
31
32
s
33
.n
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $36.86
34
7
35
R
36
37
2,
BERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. 02664 001-400-1101-4305 00284 $128.10 8113 09131 32075
10 BUS CARDS/COUNCILMEMBERS 8113 12/12/89J0
CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
30
40
11 $0.00 01/03/90
32 R BERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. 02664 001-400-1201-4305 00144 $42.70 8113
42
09131 32075
71 BUS CARDS/CITY MANAGER 8113 12/12/89
43
44
CITY MANAGER /OFFICE QPEB_UEPJ_IES $0 00_01103L90
46
13 R BERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. 02664 001-400-1203-4305 00243 $24.98
46
8156 09771 32075
36 BUS CARDS/P. DUNN 8156 12/11/89
47
PERSONNEL /QFFIGE OPER SUP�IES $0.00
37 01/03/90
48
4G
J0 R BERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. 02664 001-400-2101-4305 01141 $904.17 8157
_ 10183 32075
10 MOVING VIOLATIONS/POLICE 8157 12/19/89 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $820.05
550
1
52
.10 01/03/90
53
+' *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
54
42 $1,099.95
_
55
43
a6
51
44 R BISHOP MONTGOMERY HIGH SCHOOL 01988 001-210-0000-2110 03446 $500.00
88824 10503 32076
43 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 88824 12/19/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0,Q0
a58
D ..
60
46 01/03/90
61
47 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
62
4e $500.00
63 ,
49
64
65
50 • R BLICKMAN, INC. 03092 001-400-4601-4201 00475 $98.00
6e
10402 32077
a_!. THEATRE TECH/DEC 12-13 12/14/89
°7
52
COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00
01/03/90
68
69
53
70
54
71
55
56
72
73
17
74
7q'
J
J
2
°
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:25:43
a.4 , T ur ntltl'IUSA NtAGH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 4/1
DATE 01/04/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
CHK #
DATE INVC
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
DATE EXP
°
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***+t****at•i ****it***at**** •********•n#*******it•**•x•*****•p•*•x******•N•******** $98.00
•
R
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN
01308
001-400-1212-4188 01584 $72.69
00055
32078
90
12/28/89
EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0-0O
01/04/90
°
R
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
01308
12/28/89
145-400-3401-4188 00804 $0.69
DIAL A RIDE / MPLOYEE BENEFITS
00055 32078
$0-0Q___011.04/90
°
R
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
CITY HEALTH
01308
145-400-3402-4188 00806 $0.27
01308
32078
INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 00
01/04/40
°
*** VENDOR TOTAL********•N•***********************************•w*********#•r•******•N•***•it# $73. 65
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
01293
12/26/89
001-400-1212-4188 01580 $13,334.87
EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00056
00
32079
01/0:7/90
$0
°
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
01293
12/26/89
110-400-3302-4188 01071 $677.06
PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00056 32079
$0 00__01103/90
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
01293
12/26/89
145-400-3401-4188 00800 $17.08
DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00056
$0 00
32079
01/01/90
-
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
01293
12126L89
145-400-3402-4188 00802 $6.83
00056
32079
ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$Q_Q0
01/0'7/90
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH
01293
705-400-1209-4188 00173 $125.42
00056
32079
,
INS/JAN 90
12/26/89
LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0_00
01/03/90
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH_INSNAJ_90
01293
705-400-1217-4188 00172 $236.93
00056
32079
,
12/26/89
WORKERS COMP /EMPI OYFE BENFFITS
$0 00
01/02/90
5
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $14,398.19
5
5
5
R
BLUEPRINT SERVICE & SUPPLY CO.
ZONING/GENERAL PLAN_MAPS Mai
03190
01L02/90
001-400-1208-4305 00702 $54.44 38071
GENAP.PROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
09280
$0__00
32080
01/04/90
5
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $54.44
6
6
R
THOMAS*BOHLIN
MEALS/CHILD
00894
001-400-2101-4312 01128 $77.25
10215
32081
6
ABUSE CLASS
12/04/89
POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST
$0 00
01/03/90
6
6
A
7
4
7
7•
7.
71
6
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
o
VII
2
7 NO
,V
3
4
6
7
•
c
60
3
r
er
•
.7
70
,0
.11
42
43
44
45
10
47
49�
4J
e0
J
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:25:43
..
,41_1 yr ncrinuOm 11tM4t,
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0012
.DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4* CHK 8
DATE INVC
PROJ 4* ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
i
*** VENDOR TOTAL**************.*********.******************************************* $77.25
•
R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE
MISC. CHARGES/NOV
00163
001-400-2101-4306 00732 $167.53
00118 32082
89
11/30/89
PQLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE
$0 -00____01/04/20___ ---
0.0001/041.20__***
***VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $167.53
R MARK*BRIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
02478
140-400-4703-4201 00009 $1,713.90 403-5
08667 32083
CDBG ADMIN SERV/NOV 89 403-5
11/3Q1R9
CDBG ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0 no 01/0'I/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************.************************************************** $1,713.90
R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES
TRASH
00155
001-400-1208-4201 00604 $608.98
00005 32084
PICKUP/DEC 89
12/01/89
GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0 00 01/Q4/90
R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES
TRASH
00155
110-400-3301-4201 00237 $516.63
00005 32084
PICKUP/DEC 89
12/01/89
VEH_EKG_DIST /CONTRACT SERVICELPRIVAT
$0_00-011.04/90
>
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,125.61
R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES
REFUSE
02076
001-300-0000-3859 00031 $2,298.03
09278 32085
>
_LIENS/DEC B9
12/21/89
/REFUSE L.IEN_EEE
$0.00_01103/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.298.03
,
R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES
DUMP
00158
001-400-3103-4201 00248 $3,559.70 891100-0037002
00004 32086
CHARGES/NOV 89 37002
11/30/89
ST MAINIENANCE /C0NI$ACT SERVICELPR-IVAT
$0.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3.559.70
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
REIMS PETTY
02016
001-400-2101-4305 01144 $110.15
10505 32087
2
CASH/NOV 89
11/30.L09
POLICE /OFFICE_DPER_SUPPLIES
$Q QQ_Q11.04/90
e
e
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
REIMS
02016
001-400-2101-4316 00492 $42.50
10505 32087
e
PETTY CASH/NOV 89
11/30/89
POLICE /TRAINING
$0 00 01/04/90
e
e
.
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
REIMB
02016
001-400-2201-4305 00317 $23.49
10505 32087
e
PETTY CASH/NOV 89
11/30/89
FIRE /OEFLCE OPE SUPPLIES_
$0.00 01/04/90
e
e
7
7
7
7
7
.
7
7
J
t "a
v
7
3
4
4
0
9
,I
2
i
L.
13
3
3
1
•
4
4
w
.4
34
:.5
35
37
SO
39
40
41
42
13
44
45
45
4 41
40
49
4 50
S,
12
53
54
i* SS
lip
ISE
7
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0013
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2201-4316 00202 $10.00
10505 32087
REIMS PETTY CASH/NOV 89 11/30/89 SIRE /TRACING
$0 00_01104L90=
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4101-4305 00370 $2.12
10505 32087
REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 89 11/30/89 PLANNING /OFFICE DEER SUPPLIES
$0 00____01/_04/90
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4101-4316 00167 ' $13.00
10505 32087
REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 89 11/30/59 PLANNING /TRAINING
$0_00 01/04/90
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4201-4305 00506 $2.66
10505 32087
REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 89 11L30/89 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$0._00 01/04/90
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4601-4308 00241 $55.02
10505 32087
REIMB._. PETTY CASH/NOY 84 11/30/89 CDMM.RESOURCES LPROGRAM_►1AIERIALS
*0 00_01/04/90
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 110-400-3302-4316 00166 $21.90
REINS PETTY CASH/NOV 89 li/30/99 PARKING- ENF /TRAININ
10505 32087
iQ 00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $280.84
R BSI CONSULTANTS. INC. 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00221 $1,261.78
1428 07594 32088
PLAN REVISIONS/JULY 89 1428 11/27/89 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0 00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.261.78
R BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE 00253 110-400-3302-4316 00164 $40.20
09953 32089
PUBLICATIONS/PARKING 12/04/89 PARKING ENF /TRAININ
• of • • 90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40.20
R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY 00034 001-400-1206-4305 00414 $1,088.09
156087 09506 32090
CONT. FORM LETTERHEAD 56087 09/28/89 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$989 18 01/0'3/90
R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY 00034 001-400-1206-4305 00415 $420.89
156093 09507 32090
CONL_FORPLELAIN_AOND_56Q9.3 09/28/89 DATA PROCESSIMGIOFFICF OPER RUPPLIFS
$420_89 01/0'3/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.508.98
R C. P. P. A. 00818 110-400-3302-4315 00031 *160.00
09959 ' 32091
DUESL4_FQ.$UPERVISO:: - ... e to we .
$0 00 01/01/40
,
• F
1
9
o.0
2
3
4
•
7
9
•
20
22
23 V%
4
5
6
27 V
3, V
3. 1,0
3
7
,40
2
4
5 4.
7
5
0410
60
2
340
B
7*
0
•
3
5
•
r
1
16
27
31
32
33
34
15
36
37
36
32
0
41
42
43
44
45
40
47'
46
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56'.
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0014
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90 DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R C.P.P.A. 00818 110-400-3302-4315 00032 $40.00 09521 32091
DUES/M. STURGES 01/02/90 PARKING ENF /MEMBERSHIP $0 00_01/_0.4190_.
R C.P.P.A. 00818 110-400-3302-4317 00114 $175.00 09959 32091
PKG CONFERENCE/M. HITE 12/27/89 PARKING ENF /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 01/03/90
R C.P.P.A. 00818 110-400-3302-4317 00115 $175.00 09521 32091
PARKING CONF REG/STURGES 01/02/90 PARKING ENF /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 01104/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***•stat**********************************•***************************** $550.00
R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599 001-300-0000-3815 ' 00317 $165.78CR 00061 32092
PARKS MAINT/NOV 89 11/30/89 ORKS_SERLZCES $0 O0_01/03L20___
R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. INC. 00599 001-400-1208-4305 00701 $39.50CR 00061 32092
PARKS MAINT/NOV 89 11/30/89 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0 00 01/04/90
R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. INC. 00599 001-400-3101-4201 00028 $3,150.00 00061 32092
PARKSMAINT/NOV 89 11/30/@9 _MEDIANS /CONTRACT SERVICELERIVAT $0 00_01/02/90
R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599 001-400-6101-4201 00164 $10,025.62 00061 32092
PARKS MAINT/NOV 89 11/30/89 PARKS /CQNTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0 00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $12.970.34
R THE*CALIF PARK & REC. SOCIETY 00602 001-400-1203-4201 00623 $85.00 JB90-1205 09759 32093
EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING —1205 12/13/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $70 00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $85.00
R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-3101-4303 00068 $552.97 00129 32094
WATER BILLINGS/DEC 89 12/31/89 MEDIANS /UTILITIES $O 00 j,j1/04/90
R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE ' 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00350 $493.43 00129 32094
WATER BILLINGS/DEC, 89 12L31L89 BLDGIIAINT /UTILITIES $0.110_011404L90
R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00281 $2,546.59 00129 32094
WATER BILLINGS/DEC 89 12/31/89 PARKS /UTILITIES *0 00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,592.99
R CANADA LIFE 00046 001-400-1212-4188 01586 $735.30 00008 32095
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 01/04/90
31P�h, "v •.
i '� t;h'�r,
1
1
1
1
_3
30
1
49
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
66
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
7g
J
144
9
Irv:
1r
(=r
it
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
2
Sail IJt MktIMUUA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340
DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
PAGE
• DATE 01/040/90
6
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
°
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***********************.************************at******************* $735.30
R CANADA LIFE 00239 001-400-1212-4188 01582 $3.261.13
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00022 32096
$0.00 01/04/90
00022 32096
$0.._00 01/04/90
4
R CANADA LIFE 00239 105-400-2601-4188 00864 $99.63
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12L28/89
STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R CANADA LIFE 00239 110-400-3301-4188 00821 $4.15
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89_ VEH
00022 32096
$0 00 01/04/90
PKG DIST / MPLwcF BENEFITS
•
R CANADA LIFE 00239 110-400-3302-4188 01073 $573.94
•CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28L89
00022 32096
$0_00 01L04/90
PAIRKJNG_ENF /EMPLOYEE_BENFFITS
R CANADA LIFE 00239 145-400-3401-4188 00802 $5.16
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00022 32096
•
R CANADA LIFE 00239 145-400-3402-4188 00804 $1.76
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 EEA
$0 00 01/04/90
00022 32096
- $0.00_01104/90
00022 32096
$O 00 01/04/90
00022 32096
4
4
°
'
/EMPLOYEE_BENEFITS
R CANADA LIFE 00239 145-400-3403-4188 00214 $1.95
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
2
-
R CANADA LIFE 00239 155-400-2102-4188 00449 $14.45
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12L28L89 CRQSEINSI_GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENFFTT,S'
R CANADA LIFE 00239 160-400-3102-4188 00806 $94.78
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN
$Q—Q{1 01/04/90
00022 32096
$O 00 01/04/90
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
6
5
5
5
5
°
S
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R CANADA LIFE 00239 705-400-1209-4188 00175 $17.77
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12L29/99
00022 32096
$Q�QO 01/04/90
00022 32096
*0 00 01/n4/90
LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R CANADA LIFE 00239 705-400-1217-4188 00174 $6.31
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN -0 12/28/89 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $4.081.03 :
R CAREERTRACK. INC. 00148 001-400-4201-4316 00170 $95.00
SEMINAR REG/W. GROVE 12/07/89 BUILD/NG /TRAjNING
10310 32097
6
6.
6.
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $95.00
$O 00 01/03/90
a
6!
a,
6:
61
61
71
R J. I.*CASE CREDIT CORP. 01147 160-400-3102-6900 00100 $748.32
LEASE PMT/JANUARY 1990 12/26/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /LEASE PAYMENTS
00021 32098
•
• 12
$0"00 01/03/90
7:
7:
74
75
79
2
3 J
4
5
6
10
11
12
13
14 y
I5 .0
6
7
5
041
0
3,40
4
5
2
7
0
60
J
110
r
SklSigeWr'. nril
4
6
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
a
17
ie
21
24
2a
27
29
30
it
32
13
J4
35
36
i
30
3a
41
42
43
44
45
46
7
49
50
St
52
53
54
55
56
57
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST`
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90 §
PAGE 0016
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $748.32
•
R CELLULAR DYNAMICS COMPANY 02449 001-400-2101-4304 00463 $443.71
MOBILE PHONE CHCS/NOV 89 11/27/89 POLICE /TELEPHONE
01110
$0.00
32099
01/04/90
,:
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $443.71
R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 001-400-2101-4201 00499 $95.85
OVERHAUL TYPEWRITER/PD 1548 11/22j9 EQLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
1548
10164
$95 85
32100
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $95.85
R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2101-4311 00770 $207.27
MISC. CHARGES/DEC 89 12/15/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
01212
$0 00
32101
01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $207.27
R CHANDLER'S PV READY MIX 00009 001-400-4204-4309 01513 $182.12
MISC CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
01113
$0.00
32102
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $182.12
,R TERRY*CHARLES 00957 001-400-2101-4316 00490 $40.00
MEALS/RADAR CLASS 12/28/89 POLICE /TRAINING
10224
$0.00
32103
01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40.00
R CHEVRON USA. INC. 00634 001-400-2101-4310 00219 $316.81
MISC. CHARGES/OCT—NOV 89 11/30/89 POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
01165
$0.00
32104
01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $316.81
R CINTAS CORPORATION Q0153 001-400-4202-4187 00127 $630.45
UNIFORM RENT/NOV 89 11/30/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
00002
$0.00
32105
01/04/90
R CINTAS CORPORATION 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00212 $52.50
UNIFORM RENT/NOV 89 11/30/89 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
00002
$0.00
32105
01/04/90
2
3
4
6
e
9
0
12
13
4
e ../
6
3
3
3
41
45
49
51
52
53
55
66
5
58
50 ..,
60
62
3
•F to
W
ri
N
r
Sr
.r
3
4
5
0
0
0
24
17
1°
30
4
41
42
43
44
45
.35
47
4
50
51
52
53
5
5
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LISTVV
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
0
°
o
PAGE 0017
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $682.95
R CITY & COUNTY ENGINEER'S ASSOC 00039 001-400-4202-4315 00052 $7.00
DUES/A. ANTICH 12/20/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /MEMBERSHIP
10095
$0.00
32106
01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $7.00
R THE*CITY—COUNTY RECRUITER & 01953 001-400-1203-4201 00622 $49.02
1 EMPLOYEE ADS/ASST ENG. 4902 12/06/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
4902
09769
$0.00
32107
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $49.02
R COAST MORTGAGE & REALTY INV. 03200 126-253-0000-2542 00004 $3.949.00
SHARE OF RENTS/SEAVIEW 12/28/89 /DESGNTD/SEAVIEW PROCEED
09283
$0.00
32108
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3.949.00
R COM SYSTEMS. INC 00017 001-400-1121-4304 00245 $1.40
LONG DISTANCE CHCS/NOV89 47469 11/28/89 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE
147469
147469
147469
147469
01115
$0 00
01115
$0-00
32109
01/03/90
32109
01/03/90
R COM SYSTEMS. INC 00017 001-400-1141-4304. 00258 $20.46
LONG DISTANCE CHCS/NOV89 47469 1L/28/89 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE
R COM SYSTEMS. INC 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00278 $4.76
LONG DISTANCE CHCS/NOV89 47469 1/28/89 11:►: -.•L
01115
0 ••
01115
3000
32109
• • 90
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00279 $97.95
_ LONG DISTANCE CHCS/NOV89 47469 11/.9/89 F1NANCE..DI1IN /TELEEHDNE
32109
01/n'3/90
32109
01/03/90
32109
n1/nl/90
32109
01/01/90
32109
of/0aigo
'
1
1
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1203-4304 00278 $16.48
LONG DISTANCE CHCS/NQV89 47469 11/28/89 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE
147469
147469
147469
147469
01115
30 00
01115
$0_00
01115
$o nn
01115
80 nn
R COM SYSTEMS. INC 00017 001-400-2101-4304 00460 $288.53
LONG DISTANCE_CNCOLNOYS9 47469 11/28/89 POLICF /TEIEPHONF
R COM SYSTEMS, INC Q0017 001-400-4101-4304 00280 $26.70
LONG DISTANCE CHCS/NOV89 47469 11/28/89 PLANNTNG /TELEPHONE
• R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-4201-4304 00274 ' $19.36
LONG DISTtNCE CHCS/NOV89 47469 11/28/89 B1I DING /T PHONE
•
13
14
1•
16
17
1e
10
20
61.
2
2
3{i
•o
7o
71 1#
72
0
•
5
..1
,5
16
1
2
2
31
3
34
3s
36
37
30
35
40
41
42
03
44
45
16
47
40
49
50
3,
52
53
54
55
56
a17
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST _
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
°
9
4
°
'
9
2
3
PAGE 0018
DATE 01/04/90
•
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00281 $73.11
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/NOV89 47469 11/28/89 PUD WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE
147469
01115 32109
$0 00 01103/90
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00325 $30.13
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/NOV89 47469 11/28/89 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
147469
147469
147469
147469
01115 32109
$O_QO 01/03/90
01115 32109
1103L9.0_R
$0 00 01/03L9.0--
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-6101-4304 00182 $5.20
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/NOV89 47469 11/28/89 PARKS /TELEPHONE
RCOM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 105-400-2601-4304 00122 $7.99
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/NOVB9 47469 11/28/89 STREET LIGHTING /TELEPHONE
01115 32109
$0.00 01/03/90
01115 32109
$0.00_01/03140_
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00278 $69.12
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/NOV89 47469 11/28/89 PARKINQ_ENF /TELEEHQNE
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $661.19
R THE *COPY SHOP 00022 001-400-1203-4201 00624 $186.81
RECRUITMENT BULLETINS 12/12/59 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICELERIVAT
09768 32110
$186_81_01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $186.81
R ROBERT S.*CORRY 03198 001-300-0000-3814 00052 $266.50
REFUND APPEAL FEES 83645 12/21/89 /PLANNINGLZONING_APPEAL
83645
83645
83645
09330 32111
$0.00_01/.03/90
09330 - 32111
$0.00 01/03/90
09330 32111
$0 00 01/03/90
R ROBERT S.*CORRY 03198 001-300-0000-3825 00052 $10.00
REFUND APPEAL -FEES 83645 12/21/89 /PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING
R ROBERT S.*CORRY 03198 001-400-1121-4323 00079 $72.00
REFUND APPEAL FEES 83645 12/21/89 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $348.50
R CROSS ELECTRIC 03171 001-210-0000-2110 03456 $50.00
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 82558 12/19/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
82558
10502 32112
$0.00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00
R CSULB FOUNDATION 00349 001-400-2101-4316 00489 $275.00
SEMINAR REG/J. KEARIN 12/12/89 POLICE /TRAINING
10218 32113
$0.00 01/03/90
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
5
10
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2
29
31
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
41
4
4
44
45
4
47
48
49
5.
51
52
53
54
56
56
57
58
59 ..i
J
60
61
62
63 J
64
63
66
67
68
69
70
71 ..J
72
73
74
75
1r
BEAC
'_
3
6
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LISTyJ�
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0019iN
DATE 01/04/90
•
3
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
4
°
6 7
O
•
°
0
*** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************i►*at*�t****i **** ****** $275. 00
0
•
12
13
12
R THE*DAILY BREEZE 00642 001-400-1203-4201 00627 $101.20
01170
32114
14
6
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$n nn
n1/n7/9n
16
1117
:4
*** VENDOR TOTAL***********'*********************************************************
16
„
$101. 20
10
,t,20
21
17
"
R DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 001-400-2101-4311 00769 $637.32
MISC.
01117
32115
23
CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
$n nn
n1/04/90
24
io
25
-
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
26
21
$637. 32
37
28
22
20
.2''
24
R DELAY'S PRINTING 01847 001-400-1207-4305 00181 *49.86
01788
32116
a
BUS LIC WARNING NOTICES 12/12/89 BUS LICENSE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$4A RA
01/03/40
32
33
.76
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $49. 86
35
36
36
U
F
37
,29
30
R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00117 $625.38
00014
32117
390
SHELTER COSTS/NOV 89 12/10/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
SO 00
01/04/90
40
J1
41
,'?
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $625.38
43'
'14
4
'6
3G
R DESK CITY 01097 001-400-4202-4305 00443 $93.94 25804
10601
32118
47'
BOOKSHELVES/PUB WORKS 25804 12/26/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$0 nn
n1/a2/90
48
37
49
6
39
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $93.94
so
53
53
41
R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
42
00269 001-400-2101-4201 00502 $832.20 247340890
00068
32119
654
61
COMPUTER MAINT/NOV 89 40890 11/30/89 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
SO 00
01/04/90
56
43
57
44
R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 00269 001-400-2201-4201 00108
45
$554.80 247340890
COMPUTER MAINT/NOV 89 4Q890 11/?0/89 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
00068
$0 nn
32119
01/04/40
558
9
60
16
Cl
n
46
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,387.00
66
631
6a
49
65
50
61
R P. J.*DOHERTY III 01550 001-210-0000-2110 03455 $100.00 86929
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 86929 12/18/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
09897
$0 00
32120
01/04/90
66
a
66
52
69
7
70
54
71 I
72
65
73
56
74
�7
.+
.. 7
.
..
761
7,
.1r
J
J
VI
V
1.941 • •� r.,
3
i
a.
4.
4
4
5
5
5
Sf
'
v itLYr LI rt•-,u-+
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0020
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
w DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***************sat****a*****#**#***#*#**#*****#+rte**********ar#***#it*** $100.00
.
R DUNCAN INDUSTRIES 01184 110-400-3302-4309 00622 $238.10 P007548-0 09934
LOCKED SYSTEM PKG METER 548-0 11/20/89 PARKIN ENF /MAINT NANCE MATERIALS $a50 a1
32121
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $238.10
R DUNN—EDWARDS PAINT CO. 00161 001-400-4202-4309 00024 $214.38 140292390 10040
PAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER 92390 11/15/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /MAINTENANCF__MATERIALS $214 39
32122
01/01/90
=
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $214.38
'
R DYNAMED 01498 001-400-2201-4309 00786 $50.85 01121
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $O 00
32123
01/04/90
3
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.85
'
R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00602 $223.86 006—M60233 01168
METER USE/OCT 89 60233 12/03/89 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00
32124
01/03/90
32124
01/03/90
'
R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00603 $255.00 006—M60233 01168
MAINT CHARGE/NOV 89 60233 12/03/89 GEN APPROP LCONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $478.86
R EASY READER 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00080 $1,262.17 0268 01167
PUBLIC NOTICES/NOV 89 0268 11/30/89 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING $0 00
32125
01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,262.17
R OFCR TOM*ECKERT 01958 001-400-2101-4312 01133 $72.80 10222
MILES/CRIM JUSTICE CLASS 12/131.89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXEENSE . POST $0 00
32126
01/04/90
,
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $72.80
;
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-2101-4311 00771 $701.74 01122
MISC CHARGES/NOV e9 11/30/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $n 00
32127
01/04/90
•
e
7
7
r,L
J
41
42
43
44
45
46
:y
4
'
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME
kf °_LMr_DCICIuaM 17CMLt1
DEMAND LIST
PAGE 0021
15:25:43
FOR 01/09/90
DATE 01/04/90
'
'
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
PO # CHK #
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
'
R
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC_
00165
001-400-2201-4311 00303 $18.56
01122 32127
CHARGES/NOV 89
11/30/89
FIRE IAUID_MAINTENANCE
$0
_00.-01/04!90._
a
R
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
00165
11/30/89
001-400-3103-4311 00511 $203.23
_ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
01122 32127
SC 00 01/04/90
°
R
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
00165
001-400-3104-4311 00033 ' $62.94
01122 32127
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
11001_89
TRAFEIC_.SAFETY /AUTO MAINTENANCE
$0 D0_01L04/90
R
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
00165
001-400-4201-4311 00185 $19.16
01122 32127
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
11/30/89
BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE
$0 00 01/04/90
R
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
00165
001-400-4202-4311 00127 $80.31
01122 32127
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
11/0(89
PUI33._WKS_ARMIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE
$0 00 01/04/90
'
R
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
00165
001-400-4204-4309 01518 $95.84
01122 32127
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
11/30/89
BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
#O 00 01/04/90
°
R
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
00165
001-400-4205-4309 00427 $409.11
01122 32127
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
11/30689
EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS'
$0 00 01/04/90
R
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
00165
001-400-4601-4311 00073 $2.99
01122 32127
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
11/30/89
COMM RESOURCES /AUTO MAINTENANCE
$0 00 01/04/90
R
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
CHARGES/NOV 89
00165
1113Q/89
105-400-2601-4311 00157 $224.24
SIREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE
01122 321270CLOPMISC.
$� 01/04/90 .
R
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
00165
110-400-3302-4311 00550 $218.20
01122 32127
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
11/30/89
PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE
$O 00 01/04/90
R
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
00165
160-400-3102-4311 00132 $127.09
01122 32127 ,
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
11/30/89
DR
SEWER/ST AIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE
$n no 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,163.41
R
EL CAMINO COLLEGE
01469
001-400-2101-4312 01131 $7.50
10219 32128 s
TUISTONLt1AISKQLCQQ.KLCRAY
18L1$/69
EfLICF /TRAVFL EXPENSE , POST
$O n0 01/03/90 a
C
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $7.50
a
a
a
R
CITY OF*EL SEGUNDO
02783
170-400-2103-4201 00045 $274.77 •
10187 32129 a
CAR RENTAL/11-15 TO 28
12/20/R9
RPF TNVFRTPTNR /CENTRAI'T RFRVTCF/PRIVAT
4n nn 01/04/90 a
a
7
7
7
7
7
4
7
7
., . ay,..
to
It .4
12
13
14
la v%
IIP
3
4
7
0
2
`C
30
31
32
33
]4
'5
.'6
'7
36
30
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
49
5
51
52
53
54
55
5
A
FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:25:43 w FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0022
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $274.77
R ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 02354 001-400-3103-6900 00040 $1.736.78 0000479-479
LEASE PMT/JAN 1990 9-479 12/16/89 ST MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS
00060
$0.00
32130 ,
01/03L90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.736.78
R EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICES INC. 01294 001-400-4204-4201 00348 $1.325.00 043/037
JANITOR SERV/NOV 89 3/037 11/30/89 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
00062
S0 00
32131
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 111,325.00
R HAP*FRANK 03196 001-210-0000-2110 03453 $500.00 88806
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 88806 12/18/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
09899
$O 00
32132
01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $500.00
R JANET*FURNEE' 02610 001-400-4601-4201 00474 $75.00
THEATRE TECH/DEC 5/11 12/12/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
09100
$n no
10403
$0_00
32133
01/02/90
32133
01/03/90
R JANET*FURNEE' 02610 001-400-4601-4201 00476 $40.00
THEATRE TECH/DEC 13 12_[14/89 CQMN_RESOURCEG [CONTRACT RERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $115.00
R GATES. MCDONALD & COMPANY 02538 705-400-1217-4182 00121 $6.426.72
REIMB WORK COMP/NOV 89 110.0/89 WORKERS__COMP /WORKERS_CQME CURRENT YR
09773
$n nn
32134
01/02/90
R GATES. MCDONALD & COMPANY 02538 705-400-1217-4201 00060 $181.68 137330000402
BALANCE DUE PER CONTRACT 00402 11110/89 WORKERS COMP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
00044
sn nn
32134
01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $6,608.40
R GBH DISTRIBUTING 02875 001-400-2101-4309 00253 $195.59 2501
RADIO HEADSET REPAIR 2501 11/28/89 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATFRIALS
10163
S19R R2
32135
01/02/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $195.59
R LYNDA*000DFRIEND 03195 001-210-0000-2110 03452 $100.00 86910
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 86910 12/18/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
09896
$0''00
32136
01/04/90
5540:N1,fro �bk�iso.
2
3
4
13
14
15
16
16
19
20
21
22
23 l
24
25
27
31
3
3
44
5
9
2
4
55
56
57
58
59 ..J
61
2
3 ..J
5
66
7J
9
9
0
2
3
4
51
3
3
4
A
A
4
4
4
4
50
51
52
53
54
55
,
5
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:23:43
PAY
'-21Y ur rtttcruA REACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0023
DATE 01/04/90
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
3
1
*** VENDOR
R
TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.00
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFCRS ASSOC
PUBLICATIONS/FINANCE
00059 001-400-1202-4316 00276 $20.00
12/19/89 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING
$20.00
•
09276 32137
$0_00_011.04/90
I
4
3
*** VENDOR
TOTAL********************************************************************
'
6
R
GRANT THORNTON
AUDIT SERV/NOV 89
00742
11/30/89
001-400-1202-4201 00193
FINANCE ADMIN
$9,400.00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
09275 32138
$0 00 01/04/90
,
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $9.400.00
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
FAX BILLING/NOV 89 —6186
00015
11/30/89
001-400-1101-4304 00252
CITY COUNCIL
$0.24
/TELEPHONE
372-6186 01169 32142
$0
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELE CHGS/NOV 89
00015
11/30/89
001-400-1101-4304 00253
CITY COVI1CIL
$8.45
/TELEPJjQNE
00 01/03/90
01125 32142
*0 040_01104/90
318-0200 01262 32142
$0.00 01/04/90
01125 32142
$0_091/04/90
318-0200 01262 32142
$0.00 01/04/90
01125 32142
*0 00 01/04/90
318-0200 01262 32142
$O 00 01/04/90
372-6186 01169 32142
$0_00_ 01L01/90
01125 32142
$0 00 01/04/90
318-0200 01262 32142
*0 00 01/04/90
,
'
.
,
4
c
5
6
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
71
7
R
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 —0200
00015
12/01/89
00015
11L30/89
001-400-1101-4304 00254
CITY COUNCIL
001-400-1121-4304 00246
QITY CLERK
001-400-1121-4304 00247
CITY CLERK
001-400-1131-4304 00172
CITY ATTORNEY
001-400-1131-4304 00173
CITY ATTORNEY
001-400-1141-4304 00259
CIIY_IREASURER
$5.72
/TELEPHONE
$27.69
/TELEPHONF
$14.30
/TELEPHONE
$11.93
/T PHONE
$7.15
/TELEPHONE
$0.78
/TELEPHONE
R
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED
TELE CHGS/NOV 89
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 —0200
00015
12/01/89
00015
11/30/Q9
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELE CHCS/NOV 89
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 —0200
00015
12/01/89
00015
11/30/89
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
FAX BILLING/NOV 89 —6110
R
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED
TELE CHGS/NOV 89
00015
11/30/89
00015
12/01/89
001-400-1141-4304 00260
CITY TREASURER
001-400-1141-4304 00261
CITY TREASURER
$39.12
/TELEPHONE
*10.72
/TELEPHONE
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 —0200
'
.
- .p -
7.
7:
7.
71
71
C.J
0
3
,4
15
16
17
16
10
70
22
23
24
25
2
4
5 -/
9 J
2
3
J
:0
n
]2
33
34
T.
30
37
30
30
40
4'
42
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:25:43
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0024
DATE 01/04/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1201-4304 00279
$1.80
372-6106
01169 32142
FAX BILLING/NOV 89 _ 6186
11/30/89
CITY MANAGER
/TELEPHONE
$0..00_01/03/_90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1201-4304 00280
$22.30
00025 32142
TELE CHGS/NOV 89
11/30/89
CITY MANAGER
/TELEPHONE
$000 01/04190/
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1201-4304 00281
$12.87
318-0200
01262 32142
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 -0200
12/01109
CITY MANAGER
/TELEPHONE
•$0 00_01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1202-4304 00280
$11.75
372-6186
01169 32142
FAX BILLING/NOV 89 -6186
11/30/89
FINANCE ADMIN
./TELEPHONF
$Q nn ni M4/9n
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1202-4304 00281
$83.71
01125 32142
TELE CHGS/NOV 89
L1/30/89
FINANCE_ADMIN
/TELEPIiONE
$0 00 01/04L90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1202-4304 00282
$46.47
318-0200
01262 32142
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 -0200
12/01/89
FINANCE ADMIN
/TELEPHONE
$n nn 01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1203-4304 00279
$7.30
372-6186
01169 32142
FAX BILLING/NOV 89 -6186
11/30/89
PERSONNEL
/TELE 8QNE
$0-00_81/03/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1203-4304 00280
$31.65
01125 32142
TELE CHGS/NOV 89
11/30/89
PERSONNEL
/TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1203-4304 00281
$17.15
318-0200
01262 32142
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 -0200
12/01/89
PERSONNEL
/TELEPf1QNE
*0 00_01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1206-4304 00195
$201.82
01125 32142
TELE CHGS/NOV 89
11/30/89
DATA PROLE SING
/TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1206-4304 00196
$21.45
318-0200
01262 32142
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 -0200
12/01/89
DATA PROCESSINU /TELEPHONE$Q_00
01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1207-4304 00159
$1.21
372-6186
01169 32142
FAX BILLING/NOV 89 -6186
11/30/89
BU^>z.LICENSE
/TELEPHONE
$0 00 01/03/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1207-4304 00160
$21.52
01125 32142
TELE CHGS/NOV 89
1}J3Q/89
BUS LICENSE
/TELEPHONF
$0 00 01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1207-4304 00161
$8.71
318-0200
01262 32142
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 -0200
12/01/89
BUS LICENSE
/TELEMONE0
n0 01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1208-4304 00033
$11.38
01125 32142
TELE CHGS/NOV 89
11/30/89
GEN APPROP
/TELEPHONE
$0 DO 01/04/90
J
2
3
4
5
7 J
a
0
2
3
4
5
e
15
IY
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
31
J
3 J
3 • ..i
41
4
5
7
1 ./
2
3
4
2
3 J
5
557
8
4
0
2
3
4
5
"
%,11Y L j RMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-SFA340
=
34
`
DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:25:43 .' FOR 01/09/90 PAGE 0025 i_
DATE 01/04/90
PAY
3
r 6
VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
6
6
7
..
6
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1208-4304 00034 $7.15 318-0200 01262 32142
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 -0200 12/01/89
e
9
10
10
GEN A RO11
e� �' /TELEPHONE $0
''
3
00 01/04/90
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4201 00500 $810.7916
CAR DATA NETWORK LINE -4810 11/01/89 167-4810 10107-0
POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
12
13
16
$71fi-QQ 01/83/90
1/03/
16
3
16
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00461 $977.67 01125 32142
TELE CHGS/NOV 89 11/30/89 POLICE /TELEPHONE "$Q.QO
17
1e
to
17
V
18
n1L04l90
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00462 $660.07 318-0200 01262 32142
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 -0200 12/01/89 POLICE /TELEPHONE
20
21
23
24
20
L
2'
$0 QQ Qi/n4/9n
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00217 $184.96 01125 32142
TELE CHGS/NOV B9 11/30/89
24
24
27
27
FIRE /TELEPHONE
.2 $Q OQ_Dl/_04!90
r43 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00218 $7.15 318-0200 01262 32142
24 DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 -0200 12/01/89 FIRE /TELEPHONE3Z
25
26
29
30
$Q 00 01/04/90
0:6 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00261 - $33.27 01125 32142
27 TELE CHGS/NOV 89 11L30.LQ9
32
33
s
ANIMAL_�QNTRQL /TELEPI�ONE
L0 $0_DQ_01/04L90
36
0" R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00262 810.72 318-0200 01262 32142
30 DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 -0200 12/01/89
31 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE
37
3e
3a`
80 00 01/04/90
Oi R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00281 $1.15 372-6186 01169 3214242
31 FAX BILLING/NOV 89 -6186
•a
t1
43
34 1IL3p/B9 PLANNING /TELEPHONE lin no 01/.03/90
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00282 $61.30 01125 32142
36 TELE CHGS/NOV 89 11/30/89
37 PLANNING /TELEPHONE
tt
45
„�
20 no n1/n4/9n
38
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00283 $35.74 318-0200 01262 32142
39 DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 -0200 12Lg1/89
is
49
50
PLANNING01
4o /TELEPI-jOr1F $Q 00 01/04/90
41
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00275 $1p8, 47
42 TELE CHGS/NOV 89 01125 32142
43 11/30/89 BUILDING /TELEPHONE
52
53
54
*0 00 01/04/90
" R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00276 864.34 318-0200 01262 32142
d6 DIRECJ_PIAj,,,_(pSTLPEC 89 —0208 12/01/89
a6
66
57
59
46 _BUILDING /T 1 EEHONF $0_00 01 /04/9n
60
4
7 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00282 $22.68 372-6186 01169 32142
46 FAX BILLING/NOV 89 -6186 11/30/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE
49
61
62
63�
$O 00 01/03/40
so R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00283 $236.12
" TELE CHGS/NOV 89 01125 32142
7z 11/30/89 P IR Wu� enMrA1 /TF1 FP HIIAIC
6+
63
e
$Q 00 01/04/90
53
54
55
66
69
70
71
�6 ..
7 Y 70
72
74
74
79
d1
J
J
.1
r
0
-r-7,prrimrvrmrprpnipprill
5
3-.
3'
3:
3.
3e
3f
3,
3
4
41
42
43
44
45
46
4
46
49
50
5
5
5
54
55
56
FINANCE—SFA340
DEMAND LIST
PAGE 0026
TIME 15:25:43
FOR 01/09/90
DATE 01/04/90
•
PAY
VENDOR NAME
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-4202-4304 00284 $71.49 318-0200
01262 32142
!____,__DIRECTDIAL
COST/DEC 89 —0200
12/01/89
PUB !'JKS_ADMIN /TELEPHONE
$0.00_01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-4204-4321 00478 $17.60
01125 32142
TELE CHCS/NOV 89
11/30/89
BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT
$0.Q0 011_04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00013
001-400-4601-4304 00326 $0.99 372-6186
01169 32142
FAX BILLING/NOV 89 —6186
11/30/89
COMM_RE.SOURCES /TELEPHONE
$0 00_.01/03/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-4601-4304 00327 $174.87
01125 32142
TELE CHCS/NOV 89
11/30/89
COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
$0_00 01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-4601-4304 00328 $14.30 318-0200
01262 32142
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 —0200
12/01a9
COMM_RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
$0_.00.-01104L90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-6101-4304 00183 $10.56
01125 32142
TELE CHCS/NOV 89
11/30/89
PARKS /TELEPHONE
$0 00 01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-6101-4304 00184 $7.15 318-0200
01262 32142
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 —0200
12/01189
PARKS /TELEPHONE
$0_00.—D1L04J90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED
00015
110-400-3301-4304 00123 $10.00
01125 32142
TELE CHGS/NOV 89
11/30/59
VEH PKG DIST /TELEPHONE
*0 00 01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED
00015
110-400-3302-4304 00279 $1.74 372-6186
01169 32142
FAX BILLING/NOV 89 —6186
11L30/89
PARKING_ENF /TELEPHONE
_10_00-01103/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
110-400-3302-4304 00280 $193.32
01125 32142
TELE CHCS/NOV 89
11/30/89
E6.fSING ENF /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/04/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED
00015
110-400-3302-4304 00281 $82.21 318-0200
01262 32142
DIRECT DIAL COST/DEC 89 —0200
12/01/89
PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE
$0_00_01104190
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
145-400-3401-4304 00044 $4.16
01125 32142
TELE CHGS/NOV 89
11/30/89
DIAL A RIDE /TELEPHONE
$0 00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL **********************,
*****************apt***************it********** $4.437.16
R
GUARDIAN DENTAL
02623
001-400-1212-4188 01581 $2,029.69
00001 32143
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26/89
EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00 01/03/90
R
GUARDIAN DENTAL
02623
105-400-2601-4188 00863 $4.20
00001 32143
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26/89
STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00 01/03/90
.
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
14
16
16
n
le
10 .J
J
J
20
21
2
2
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
3
31 .J
3
3
3
3
3
4
41
4
4
4
4
S
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 ..j
6
6
9
61
2
3
S
7J
6
9
0
2
3
4
5
SE
v
lir
oto
IV
06,
2
4
z
2
3C
31
32
3]
35
3
•
41
42
43
44
45
4
47
40
4D
5
51
5
3
54
55
c•
2
4
15
7 .y
s
.J�
20
21
22
23
24
25
2.
27 J
2
2
31 J
3
3
3.
1
5
7,4
2
5V
ov
3U
5
7
e
9
0
2
3
4
—a. !1_YI_111-8113 r71"1 U .n..V
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0027
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90 DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK *
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 110-400-3302-4188 01072 *104.73 00001 32143
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/26L09 p.ARKINQ ENF /EMPLOYEE_BENEELTS *0 00__.01/03/_90
•
'
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 145-400-3401-4188 00801 *2.22 00001 32143
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/26/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *0 00 01/01/90
'
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 145-400-3402-4188 00803 ' *1.14 00001 32143
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/26/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 01/03/90
R GUARDIAN.DENTAL 02623 145-400-3403-4188 00213 $3.43 00001 32143
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/26/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *0 00 01/03/90
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 160-400-3102-4188 00805 $27.30 00001 32143
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/26/89 SEWERLST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE 5ENEFITS $000_01!43/90
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 705-400-1209-4188 00174 *28.66 00001 32143
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/26/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 01/03/90
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00173 $33.91 00001 32143
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/26/89 WORKERS COUP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $.O..00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR, TOTAL******************************************•n************************* $2.235.28
R DIANNE*GUESS 03194 001-210-0000-2110 03451 $50.00 55353 09891 32144
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 55353 1 18/89 /DEPOSITS/WORILGJJABANTEE *0 00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL*•*****************************•************************************** *50. 00
R FRANK B.*HALL & CO. OF CALIF. 03147 705-400-1210-4201 00041 *8.798.11 543313 09778 32145
MOBILE EQUIP CQVERAQ 48313 12/19/89 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0 00 01/01/90
,
*** VENDOR TOTAL***************a•************ac•*******•x•******************************* $8.798.11
R HEKIMIAN & ASSOCIATES. INC. 02541 001-400-8601-4201 00052 *206.24 7559 10029 32146
REWR DAMAGED FUEL.ANK_.Z ,79 12L31/89 86-601 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 120A 24 01/01/90
1
e
•
,
_CIP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *206.24
R HERMAN—PHINNEY—KODMUR 01460 160-400-3102-4309 00433 $2.940.59 89D261 10025 32147
SEWER PUMP/INS IDE -33R 90261 12/11/89 SEWFR/RT DRAIN !MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *1.000 00 01/01/90
e
e
e
e
7
y
35
3
•
41
42
43
44
45
4
47
40
4D
5
51
5
3
54
55
c•
2
4
15
7 .y
s
.J�
20
21
22
23
24
25
2.
27 J
2
2
31 J
3
3
3.
1
5
7,4
2
5V
ov
3U
5
7
e
9
0
2
3
4
2-
r
5
to
13
14
15
1f.
17
10
1:
2
31
32
33
34
15
311
37
0
30
40
41'
42
43
44
45
40
47
46
49
5
51
52
53
54
56
56
57
d
it
J
.J
FINANCE—SFA340,.
TIME 15:25:43
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0028
DATE 01/04/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************************** t** . $2,940.59
R
HERMOSA CAR WASH
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
00065
11/30/89
001-400-1207-4311 00032 $4.00
BUS LICENSE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
01128
$0.00
32148
01(03L90
32148
R
HERMOSA CAR WASH
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
00065
11/30/89
001-400-2101-4311 00767 $140.00 '
POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
01128
$0 00_01/03/90
01128
*0.00
01128
*0 00_.01!_03!_20
R
HERMOSA CAR WASH
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
00065
11/30/89
001-400-4201-4311 00184 $4.00
BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE
32148
01/03/90
32148
R
HERMOSA CAR WASH
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
00065
11/30/89
001-400-6101-4311 00199 $4.00
PARKS /AVIDLMA NTENANCE
R
HERMOSA CAR WASH
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
00065
11/30/89
110-400-3302-4311 00549 $24.00
PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE
01128 32148
$0.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR
TOTAL******************************************************************** $176.00
R
HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00652 $1,223.00 40R1058
COMPUTER MAINT/DEC 89 R1058 12/01/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.223.00
00009
$0.00
32149
01/04/90
*** VENDOR
R
INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
TRACK LITES/COUN CHAMBER 37386
02458
12/12/89
001-400-4204-4309 01509 $131.46 37386
BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
10086
$131.47
10035
32150
01/03/90
32150
01/0'3/90
R
INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
COMMERCIAL METER SOCKETS 36053
02458
1IL09/89
105-400-2601-4309 00554 $2,644.02 36053
STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE_MATER.IALR $2x.`00.62
•***
VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.775.48
R
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
DUES/WISNIEWSKI/ALTFELD
00567
12/20/89
001-400-2101-4315 00148 $200.00
POLICE /MEMBERSHIP
10198
$0-00
32151
01/01/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $200.00
R
J C PAPER
COPIER PAPER/STOCK 01990
03083
.09/12/89
001-400-1208-4305 00700 $1,118.25 84101990
GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
09239
$0 00
32152
01/01/90
d
it
J
.J
1
f 4,
M
V
2
2
3
3
1
3
4
41
4
e
e
°
o
'&1 LWLtGWJu a m=bium
FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:25:43 - FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0029
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL***********a•*****u***u•*a****************** **********arta*sa *****•x•+r** $1,118.25
2
R KIWANIS CLUB OF HERMOSA BEACH 00380 001-400-4101-4315 00107 $40.00
DEC DUES/M. SCHUBACH 12/12/89 PLANNINQ /MEMRERSHIP
08668
$0.00
32153
01/01/90
- -
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************a******************************+t**** $40.00
R MARK*KUBR 03199 001-400-4601-4201 00473 $387.00
FALL RECREATION INSTR. 12/04/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
09099
$O 00
32154
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $387.00
j
R JEFF*LANKF0RD 03197 001-210-0000-2110 03457 $50.00
ALVIMI.. TRAP REFUND 89252 12/18/89_ /n POSTTS/WDRK 0UARANTEc
89252 10501
an nn
32155
nl/n4/9n
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00
R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-2201-4309 00783 $3.54
MIISG,__CHAR_GES/NOV 89 11/30/89 FIR /MAINT NANCE MATERIAE c
01131 32156
*0 nn 01/n4/9n
01131 32156
$0
R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-2401-4309 00132 $37.28
MISC,_CHARGES/NOV89 11130189 ANIMAL_CONTROL__/MAINTENANCE MATER/A)4
R LEARNED LUMDER 00167 001-400-4204-4309 01515 $172.01
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00_01./04L9n
01131 32156
$O 00 01/04/90
01131 32156
,
R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 160-400-3102-4309 00435 $34.29
MISC. CHARGE$/JVQV 89 11/30/89 SEWER/SIDRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $247.12
SO 00
01/04/90
e
t
R LISTEN TO LEARN 03075 001-210-0000-2110 03454 $500.00
DAMAGE DEPOSIT RSEQND 06444 12118/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
86944 09898
$O 00
32157
01/04/90
t
t
a
a
e
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $500.00
R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. 00077 001-400-4101-4305 00369 '$59.06
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
01133
*0 00
32158
01/01/90
e
e
e
e
7
7
•
7
7
45
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
54
55
1,156
556
ivitY
•
2
3
4
6
7 J
e
e
0
2
3
4
5 JO
�7
38
t° QV
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
31 J
2
3
4
5V
e
° rl
3 r
•
•
4
(;I FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:25:43
ti
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
O
•
PAGE 0030
DATE 01/04/90
3
4
INV/REF PD # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
5
4
7
n
R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC.
.MISC CHARGES/NOV89.
00077 001-400-4202-4305 00444 #48.12
11/30/89PUB WKSADMIN_.__1OFFICE_OPER._SUPPLIES____._
R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC. 00077
MISC CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89
001-400-8613-4201 00001
CIP 89-613
01133 32158
01/03/90___
$230.50 01133 32158 ,
/CONTRACT SERYICELPR.IVAT $0 00 01/_03/_90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $337.68
R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
NON—FLAME UNIF/CHESSON 39551
01320 001-400-2201-4187
11/30/89 FIRE
R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 01320
FLAMEX UNIF/BRUCCOLIERI 39566 11/30/89
1'
LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 01320
FLAMEX UNIFORM/BRIDGES 39567 J1/30L$9
001-400-2201-4187
FIRE
00179 $296.24 35462/39551
LMALEDRM ALLOWANCE $296_2401/03/90
08328 32160
00180 $296.24
..___LUN I FORM._ALLOWANCE________
001-400-2201-4187
R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 01320
.._,_,_FLAMEX UNIFORM/CLAWSON,_._39553 11/30/89
R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
EIRE
001-400-2201-4187
00181 $296.24
/UNIEQRM_ALLOWANCF
00182 $296.24
.,FIRE_
01320 001-400-2201-4187
_NON-FLAME_UNIFORM/DALE 39562 11L3QL69
R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
_.__FLAMEX UNIFORM/CRAWFORD 39555
R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
FLAMEX UNIF/MC CAMANT 39552
R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
FLAMEX UNIF/P.__OSEKOWSKY39556
FIR
39566
08332 32160
__ ...__.__ $296. 24___.01/03/90 ___
39567 08339 32160
LUNIFORM_ALLOWANCE__
00183 $296.24
E /lINIEDRM ALLOWANCE
01320 001-400-2201-4187
11/30/89 FIRE_
01320 001-400-2201-4187
11/30t89 FIRE
01320 001-400-2201-4187
11/30/89 _ __.FIRE
R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 01320
FLAMEX UNIF/N. METZGER 39554 11/30/8-
R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
NON—FLAME UNIFORM/SCOTT 39563
14
$296_24 .131L03/90._
39553 08340 32160
$296.24___..01 /03/90
39562 08341 32160
$296.24_01103/90
00184 $296.24
_JUNIFORM_.ALLOWANCF
00185 $296.24
39555 08345 32160
$296.24_ 01/03/90
39552 08329 32160
/VNIEORM_ALLOWANCF $296_24 01/03/90
00186 $296.24 •
___LUN IFOR M_ ALLOWANCE.
001-400-2201-4187
FIR
00187 $296.24
39556 08330 32160
$296.24—.01/03/90_
39554 08331 32160
E /UNIEDR&ALLOWANCE
01320 001-400-2201-4187
11/30/89 _ FIRE
LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 01320
FLAMEX UNIFORM/HAWKINS 39560 11/30/9
R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
001-400-2201-4187
FIRE
00188 $296.24
/UNIFDRM _ALLOWANCE__
00189
01320 001-400-2201-4187 00190
FLAMEX_ UNIFORM/CARROLL_39568
11/30/89 FIRE
$296. 24
/UNIFORM ALLOWANCE_
$296.24
$296 24_01L03L90
39563 08333 32160
$296. 24___01/03/90____
39560 08334 32160
$296 24_0110'1/90
/UNIEORM_.ALLOWANCE
39568 08335 32160
$296,24____01/03/90_____
�.
11
a
GJ
20
21
22
23
24
25
:G
27
:0
31
32
3
3
35
17
41
4
44
41
aG
47
aB
aU
53
55
11-
39563
.G
57
50
50
n0
42
G7
Ga
G5
nn
e2
71
72
/3
/4
2S
I.
M
1161
L56
3
4
4
4
4
4
40
40
3
51
52
53
54
35
14..
'
2
4
6.
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:25:43
.1 1 Y Ut_I'1E11 e
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90 •DATE
PAGE 0031
01/04/90
5
5
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
5
0
'
`
3
R
R
LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
FLAMEX UNIFORM/WILLIAMS 2.064
01320 001-400-2201-4187. 00191 $296.24
11/3Q/_89 EIRE /UNIFORM_ALLOWANCE
39564 08336 32160
$296_..24_01L03L90
LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
FLAMEX UNIF/LICKHALTER 39565
01320 001-400-2201-4187 00192 $296.24
11/30/89 FIRE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
39565 08337
$296 24
39561 08338
$296_24
32160
01/03/90
32160
f1/n'4/9n
32160
32160
32160
01/03/90
:
1
_
4
5
R
LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
NON—FLAME UNIFORM/LINE$ 39561
01320 001-400-2201-4187 00193 $296.24
11LOQ/89 FIRE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
5
R
LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
FLAMEX UNIF/S. O3EKOWSKY 39557
01320 001-400-2201-4187 00194 $296.24
11/30/89 FIRE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
01320 001-400-2201-4187 00195 $296.24
11L3QL$9 ERRE /UNIFORCLALLOW6NCE
39557 08342
$29.6....24_01/113
39559 08343
$296_24_01103L90
R
LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
NON—FLAME UNIFORM/KLEIN 39539
R
LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
NON—FLAME UNIFORM/HILL 39558
01320 001-400-2201-4187 00196 $296.24
11/30/89 FIRE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
$5,332.32
39558 08344
$296.24
c
*** VENDOR TOTAL************************a••p•******************************************
E.
°
R
LOS ANGELES CO. ASSESSOR
MAP REVISIONS/DEC 89 6954
02769 001-400-4101-4305 00368 $13.65
12/05/89 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$13.65
695 08669
$0 00
32161
01/03/90
3
4
4
4
*** VENDOR TOTAL•Ir**************•u********************•rt*****************{t*************
'
'
R
COUNTY OF*L0S ANGELES
PERSONNEL SERV/JUL—SEP 316
00587 001-400-1203-4251 00125 $1,802.70
12/05/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
316 09765
$0.00
32162
01/04/90
4
4
4
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$1.802.70
5.
5
R
LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
TUITION/T_ CHARLES
00718 001-400-2101-4316 00491 $100.00
12/28/89 POLICE /TRAINING
10223
32163
5
5
5,
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.00
$0 00
01/04/90
5i
5.
51
R
LOS ANGELES TIMES
MISC CHARGES/NOV 89
00213 001-400-1203-4201 00628 $289.68
11/30/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
01172
$0.00
32164
61
6
6'
6:
*** VENDOR TOTAL*********************ai********************************************** $289.68
01/03/90
a
6:
64**********************************************
R
'
LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC.
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 44287
. .{.:
00079 001-400-2101-4187 00304 $94.73
11/30/89 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
244287 01134
32165
61
61
,1
5. -
$0'00
01/04/90
7:
7:
n
'f
Lii
23
4
3
6
6
9
10
1J
2
3
e
6
9J
0
3 J
4
7 J
7
J
•
•
6
7
n
0
22
26
2
3
31
3
7'.
32
7C
41
42
43
44
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:25:43
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0032
DATE 01/04/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DATE INVC PRnJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR
TOTAL****************************************gra************************** $94. 73
•
R
MAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO.
00426
001-400-4204-4309 01512 $88.34
01135
32166
MISC CHARGES/NOV 89
11/30/89
BLDQIIAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$0_OQ_01LY /90
*** VENDOR
TOTAL********************************************************************
$88.34
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01859
001-400-1212-4188 01583 $766.88
00041
32167
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
EMP BENEFITS /EMPIOYEF RFNFFTTR
$0_00
01/04/90
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01859
105-400-2601-4188 00865 $31.11
00041
32167
CITY HEALTH-INS/JAN 9Q
12L28LB9
STREELLIGHTING /EMELOYEE_BENEE.IIS
$0 0a— 01/04190
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01859
110-400-3301-4188 00822 $0.66
00041 32167
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/29/89
VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$n on
01/04/90
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01859
110-400-3302-4188 01074 $136.70
00041
32167
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
EARK.INQ ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0__00_01/04190
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01859
145-400-3401-4188 00803 $4.30
00041
32167
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 n0
01/04/90
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01859
145-400-3402-4188 00805 $1.45
00041
32167
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28189
ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEEIIS
$0 00-01/04/90
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01859
145-400-3403-4188 00215 $0.46
00041
32167
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 00
01/04/90
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01859
155-400-2102-4188 00450 $1.92
00041
32167
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
CROSSING /EMPLOYEE_BENFFITR
$0. 0
01/04/90—
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01859
-GUARD
160-400-3102-4188 00807 $18.44
00041
32167
CITY HEALTH IN9LJAN_9Q
12L28/89
SEW : l:s . w• 1
• ••
S O. -4
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01859
705-400-1209-4188 00176 $1.92
00041
32167
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28189
LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 00
01/04190
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01859
705-400-1217-4188 00175 $3.84
00041
32167
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 00
01/04/90
*** VENDOR
TOTAL******************************************************************** $967.68
R
MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES. INC.
02272
001-400-2101-6900 00478 $9.335.36
00065
32168
LEASE PMT/JAN 1990
12/31/89
POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS
$0 00
01/04/90
.
MR'
ik
23
5
6
7
6
•
0
2
3
4
6
6
7
16
ID
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2
29
3
3
3
35
3
3
3
41
4
4
44
45
4
47
49
5
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
6N
69
70
71
72
73
74
76 l
-
r
2
3
4
6
0
9
1
12
14
12
iW
�i.
21
24
7a
27
72
29
30
31
32
33
39
40
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
9
'Fu 31
1,s2
83
a4
55
"
7
`l/
FINANCE—SFA340,. DEMAND LIST PAGE 0033
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90 DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND it ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO R CHK $
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 41 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. 02272 001-400-2101-6900 00479 $1,072.55 00059 32168
LEASE PMT/JAN 1990 12/31/89 POLICE /LEAa.E PAYMENTS $0 00 01/_04L90
R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. 02272 001-400-2101-6900 00480 $1.233.52 00056 32168
LEASE PMT/JAN 1990 12/31/89 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0 00 01L04/90
R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. 02272 001-400-2101-6900 00481 $26.310.45 00064 32168
LEASE PMT/JAN 1990 01/01/90 PQl.,jl:E /LEASE PAYMENTS $0-00 01L04/90
R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. 02272 001-400-2201-6900 00097 $17.540.30 00064 32168
LEASE PMT/JAN 1990 01/01/90 FIRE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************************.******* $55.492.18
R MARTIN & CHAPMAN CO. 00289 001-400-1122-4201 00192 $36.95 5476-11975 09317 32169
BINDERS/CITY CLERK 11975 11/30/89 ELECTIONS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $33 10 01/03/90
R MARTIN & CHAPMAN CO. 00289 001-400-1122-4201 00193 $540.36 11915 09322 32169
ELECTION SERVICES/NOV 7. 11915 11/15/89 ELECZiON5 /CONTRACT SERA/ICE/PRIVAT $362.90_01/03/90
R MARTIN & CHAPMAN CO. 00289 001-400-1122-4201 00194 $345.79 11915 09329 32169
ELECTION SERVICES/NOV 7, 11915 11/15/89 ELECTIONS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0 00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $923.10
R MARX BROTHERS 03183 001-400-4204-4321 00475 $380.00 8673 10087 32170
YRLY SERV/EXTINGUISHERS 8670 12/28/89 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $3Rn on 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $380.00
R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM. INC. 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00065 $4,313.61 1949/1952 10082 32171
GASOLINE/CITY YARD /1952 12/05/89 /GASOLINE INVFNTORY $n on 01/04/90
R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM. INC. 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00066 $2.672.98 2016 10098 32171
GASOLINELCITY YARD 2016 L2L20LR9 /GASOLINE INVENTORY S0_.00 01 /04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $6.986.59
R VALERIE*MOHLER 00956 001-400-1202-4305 00274 $57.46 6482093 09284 32172
EXPRESS MAIL/CAFR REPORT 82093 12/28/89 FINANCE Anp(IN /OFFTCF OPER SUPPLIES 3o n0 01/02/90
a
3
4
a
•
7
a
•
10
I1 J
2
•
a J
a
17
la
I• .i
20
22
2l ■
23 J
24
23
27 J
31 J
3
3
41
9
1J
2
3
4
6
6
a'' `
9 V
0
3
8
0
2
3
4
v
53
54
55
56
57
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:25:43
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0034
DATE 01/04/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME -
DESCRIPTION
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $57.46
R
MOORE BUSINESS FORMS
00423
001-400-2101-4305 01139 $474.61 55963534
10176
32173
COMPUTER PAPER/DISPATCH 63534
11/30/89
POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$474 10
01/01/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$474.61
R
MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY
00091
001-400-1212-4188 01587 $772.20
00013
32174
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
In 00
0i/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$772.20
R
NEW YORK FOOD CO., INC.
03191
001-210-0000-2110 03447 $100.00 86899
09895
32175
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 86899
12/18/89
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
$0 00
01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$100.00
R
OCHOA & SILLAS
00093
001-400-1131-4201 00533 $150.00 3700
09282
32176
LEGAL SERV/SEP. 89 3700
12/28/89
CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$150.00
R
OLIVER. STOEVER. BARR & VOSE
02892
001-400-1131-4201 00534 $6.952.75
09138
32177
LEGAL SERV/NOV 89
12/12/89
CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0-00
01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $6,952.75
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
00235
001-400-1212-4188 01578 $1.277.36
00019
32178
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26/89
EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 00
01/03/90
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
00235
105-400-2601-4188 00861 $67.12
00019
32178
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26/89
STREET LI9HI.ING_LEMPLOYEE_BENEFITS
$0 00
01L03L90
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
Q0235
110-400-3301-4188 00819 $1.44
00019
32178
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26/89
VEH PKC DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFIT• S
$O 00
01/02/90
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
00235
110-400-3302-4188 01069 $313.79
00019
32178 -
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26/89
PARKING ENF /EMP_LOYEF BFNFFITS
$0.00
01/03/90
6
13
14
15
16
17
18
16
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
31
35
41
4
45
4
47
49
5.
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
61
62
63 .i
4
65
66
67
69
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
tL
3
1.
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
51
]
5534
55
'
°
1
4
7
FINANCE–SFA340
TIME 15:25:43
''
1 ..,,I-1311-.-.$] 4. Gfl . l
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0035
DATE 01/04/90
•
PAY
VENDOR NAME
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
00235
145-400-3401-4188 00798 67.54
00019 32178
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26189
DIAL_A_RIDE /EMELQYEE_,BENEEITS
$O 00_01103/9n
'
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
00235
145-400-3402-4188 00800 $2.45
00019 32178
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
121$6/89
ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$O 00 01/02/90
I
.
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
00235
122L24/89
155-400-2102-4188 00447 $5.21
CROSSING_SUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00019 32178
$0_On 01/02/90
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
00235
160-400-3102-4188 00803 432.96
00019 32178
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26/89
SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
YO 00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL****•�t****•x•**•»*************�t•*•x••�t*•a*****•p***a•*******+t****************** $1.707.87
R
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE
00321
001-400-2101-4304 00464 $168.91
00036 32179
COMPUTER HOOKUP/DEC 89
12/01/89
POLICE /TELEPHONE
$O 00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $168.91
R
PACIFICARE
00575
001-400-1212-4188 01579 $16.879.56
00016 32180
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26/89
EMP OENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0 00 611/03/90
R
PACIFICARE
00575
105-400-2601-4188 00862 $709.52
00016 32180
,
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26/09
STREEI_LIGH7_INO_LEMELOYEE_BENEEITS
*0 On n1/03/90
R
PACIFICARE
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
00575
L2/26/89
110-400-3301-4188 00820 $12.04
VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00016 32180
$O 00 01/n3/90J3
.
R
PACIFICARE
00575
110-400-3302-4188 01070 $2.828.91
00016 32180
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26/89
PARKING_ENF /EMPLOYEEENEFITS
$n On 01/03/90
R
PACIFICARE
00575
145-400-3401-4188 00799 $82.50
00016 32180
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26/89
DIAL A RIDE EM
/PLOY BENEFITS
150 00 01/02/90
=
R
PACIFICARE
00575
145-400-3402-4188 00801 $27.46
00016 32180
e
CITY HEALTH IN$/JAN 99
12126/89
ESEA. /EMPLOYEE EENEFITR
S0 QO-01L07/4n
00016 32180
e
e
R
PACIFICARE
00575
145-400-3403-4188 00212 $7.22
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/26/89
BUS PASS $UBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
S0 00 01/03/90
e
a
R
PACIFICARE
00575
155-400-2102-4188 00448 $48.06
00016 32180
e
CATV HEALTH INSLJAN 90
12/26/99
CROSSING GUARD /FMPLf1YFF j3FNFF1T4
m .r•
$n nn 01/02/90
e
a
7
7
7
.
7
7
O
7
7
.w.
a
3 .41
4
5
4
7
O J
3
4
5 .i
'
5
0
3 4)
4
7`%
1
8
4
3 Y
4
7.y
e
0
I n►
2
3
4
5
FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
-i
PAGE 0036
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R PACIFICARE 00575 160-400-3102-4188 00804 $325.06
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/26/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPL.yEE BENEFITS
00016 32180
$0.0_-_01/03/90
R PACIFICARE 00575 705-400-1209-4188 00172 $87.50
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/26/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00016 32180
$Q.00 01/02190'
R PACIFICARE 00575 705-400-1217-4188 00171 $87.50
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/26/89 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00016 32180
$Q.00L_01/Q3L90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $21,095.33
R PADGETT-TH0MPSON 01658 001-400-1205-4316 00053 $69.00
SEMINAR REG/M. TERCERO 12/12/89 CABLE TV /TRAINING
09955 32181
$0 00_01/04L90
R PADGETT-TH0MPSON 01658 110-400-3302-4316 00165 $69.00
SEMINAR REG/H. STATEN 12/12/89 PARKING ENF /TRAINING
09955 32181
$0 00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $138.00
R PAGENET 02487 001-400-1201-4201 00072 $11.50
PAGING SERV/DEC 89 12/01/89 CITY MANAGER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
00059 32182
$0.00 01/03/90
00059 32182
$0_00_01/03/90
R PAGENET 02487 001-400-2101-4307 00200 $162.58
PAGING SERV/DEC 89 12/01/89 POLICE /RADIO MAINTENANCE
R PAGENET 02487 001-400-2401-4201 00219 $11.50
PAGING SERV/DEC 89 12/01/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SER.LX E/PRIVAT
00059 32182
$0.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL**************************1***************************************** $185.58
.R PHENIX TECHNOLOGY, INC. 02690 180-400-2202-4201 00029 $1,100.00
FINAL PMT/FIRE FLOW 3152 12/12/89 HYDRANT UPGRADE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
3152 08370 32183
*0 00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.100.00
R BRUCE*PHILLIPS 00534 001-400-2101-4312 01132 $30.16
MILES/INVEST. CLASS 12/19/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POJ'
10221 32184
$0.00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $30.16
R POM INCORPORATED 00223 110-400-3302-4309 00621 $346.26
' PARKING METER PARTS 11126 11/17/89 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
911126 09933 32185
$368°46 01/03/90
�`k{411rMpN��e$7�!1.1Wn�.V�.i.[�1111 r1;110 r�fd�7 t►i��.i7,�.
i ,T r ry 1-A-4 e.
3
7
13
14
15
16
17
6
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
2
2
31
3
3
3
3
1
4
45
47
4
1
2
3
4
6
7
9
0
3
4
6
0.J
J
J
J
2
3
4 ✓
t
44
p. 43
46
1;.., 47
46
0
4
1. `, so
s,
52
'5 53
54
I 55
36
�
•
3 ._
4
5
6
7 ...11
r
fo
2
3
4
5
6
J
3 J
4
7 .4
7
5
a
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:25:43
�. a i r ur nmrr,uaM BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 37
DATE 01/04/90/
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************•***************************** #346.26
R
PRECISION OFFICE SYSTEMS
TYPEWRITER
03189
001-400-1121-4201 00032 $60.00 59-1213-1
09326
32186
SERV/CTY CLRK 213-1
12/13/89
CITY CLERK /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00
01/03/90
5
*** VENDOR TOTAL*****'*************************************************************** $60.00
7
5
R
PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
00585
12/28/89
001-400-1212-4188 01589 $61.25
EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00038
$0.00
32187
01/04/90
R
PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO.
CITY
00585
105-400-2601-4188 00867 $2.50
00038
32187
_
_HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0..00__91L04/30—..:
R
PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO.
00585
110-400-3301-4188 00823 $0.50
00038
32187
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/04/90
5
'
R
PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO.
00585
110-400-3302-4188 01075 $4.25
00038
32187
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BEJEFITS
$0 00_01104/90
R
PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO.
00585
160-400-3102-4188 00809 $1.00
00038 32187
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/04/90
'
R
PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO.
00585
705-400-1209-4188 00178 $1.25
00038
32187
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0_0Q___01/04/90
4
1
1
R
PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO.
00585
705-400-1217-4188 00177 $1.25
00038 32187
4
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90
12/28/89
WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/04/90
4
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $72.00
5
S
5
R
PROTECTIVE NATL INSURANCE CO.
02691
705-400-1209-4324 00116 $1,000.00
09770
32188
5
LIAB CLAIM DEDUCTIBLE
12/19/89
LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS
$0 00
01/03/90
5
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** '$1,000.00
5
6
R
PURKISS-ROSE ASSOCIATES
02982
001-400-4601-4201 00472 $3,577.17 5956
10405
321896
CONTRACT PMT/NOV 89 5956
11/30/89
COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRjyAT
$0.00
01/03/90
6
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,577.17
6
6
..
6
R
RADIO SHACK
01429
001-400-1205-5401 00001 $53.32
01243
32190
7
MISC. CHARGES/DEC 89
12/15/89
CABLE TV /EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $50
$0700
01/04/90
7
7.
7.
•
i.
71
7i
3 ._
4
5
6
7 ...11
r
fo
2
3
4
5
6
J
3 J
4
7 .4
7
5
a
FINANCE-SFA340 .. DEMAND LIST PAGE 0038
TIME 15:23:43 FOR 01/09/90 DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R RADIO SHACK 01429 110-400-3302-4305 00632 $5.85 01243 32190
MISC. CHARGES/DEC 89 12/15/89 PARKING FNF /DEE1.CE PEER SUPPLIES $0 00_01/_04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $59.17
R READICARE MEDICAL GROUP -LAX 02390 001-400-1203-4201 00629 $536.00 94-31445/449 09772 32191
PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 5/449 08/08/89 PER$ONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICELPR1MAT $0_00_01/04L90_____
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $536.00
R AWARDS*REX GROUP 00100 001-400-4601-4308 00240 $65.50 15801 09098 32192
CHRISTMAS ACTIVITY AWARD 15801 12/08/89SQMM_RESQURCES__LEROORANLMAIERIALS $65._34_.01.04190,
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $65.50
R RICH GRAPHICS 00224 001-400-1202-4305 00275 $106.50 2325 09267 32193
DIVIDERS/CAFR REPORT 2325 12/12/89 FINANCE_ADMIN_/OFFICE OPER_SUPR.LIES $106-50_01104/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $106.50
R RICK'S WELDING 03178 001-400-4204-4309 01520 $170.40 10603 10068 32194
WINDOW/BASEMENT/GEN SERV 10603 12/08/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTFNANCE_MATERJALS $1Z0.-40 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $170.40
R ROTARY CLUB OF HERMOSA BEACH 00506 001-400-2101-4315 00147 $287.50 10199 32195
DUES/S. WISNIEWSKI 12/20/89 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $287.50
R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES 01578 001-400-3104-4201 00043 $1.037.50 89418 10066 32196
ENGINEERING SERV/OCTOBER 89418 11/01/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR VAT $1.037,.50 O1LQ4L9_Q_
ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES Q1578 001-400-4202-4201 00261 $1,062.50 89451 10092 32196
ENGINEERING SERV/NOV 89 89451 12/01/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/P$IVAT $0.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.100.00
R THE*SANDMAN INN 03187 001-400-2101-4312 01130 $190.80 10216 32197
HOTEL/T. BOHLING 12/04/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0:00 01/03/90
29
3
31
53
57
56
59
62
63
64
65
66
67
66
69
70
71
72
73
7
75
3
`.I
r16
LJ
•W
2
4:
AI
4
z
°
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:25:43
a. a 1 7 ur r7CKMUj7A istAGM
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE
DATE
0039
01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DATE INVC
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************+************************************************* $190.80
•
R SUSAN*SAXE—CLIFFORD,PH D
PSYCH EVAL/POLICE
00839
001-400-1203-4320 00285 $275.00 9-1129-2
09777
32198 ;.
129-2
11/29/89
PERSONNEL /PRE—EMPLQYMENT EXAMS
$12-00
01L03/90
R SUSAN*SAXE—CLIFFORD,PH D
PSYCH EVAL/POLICE 207-2
00839
12/07/89
001-400-1203-4320 00286 $275.00 9-1207-2
PERSONNEL /PRE—EMPLOYMENT
09767
32198
EXAMS
$0.00__Q1L03/9.0__
R SUSAN*SAXE—CLIFFORD,PH D
PSYCH EVAL/POLICE
00839
001-400-1203-4320 00287 $275.00 9-1129-7
09764
32198
129-7
11/29/89
PERSONNEL /PRE—EMPLOYMENT EXAMS
$0.00
01/03/90
R SUSAN*SAXE—CLIFFORD,PH D
217-5
00839
001-400-1203-4320 00288 $275.00 9-1217-5
09774
32198
_PSYCHEVAL/POLICE
12/17/89
PERSONNEL LERE—EMELQYMENT EXAMS
$0
00_01l_Q4/30
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.100.00
R OLGA*SCHUMACHER
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND
03192
001-210-0000-2110 03449 $50.00 80653
09893 32199
80653
12/18/89
/DEPOSIISLWOR15`GUARANIEE
$Q...0Q_OLL04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00
?
'
R SHELL OIL CO.
MISC. CHARGES/NOV
00320
001-400-1203-4317 00054 $10.08
01172
32200
89
11/30/89
PERSONNEL- /CONFERENCE EXPENSE
$0.00
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $10.08
4
R SIR SPEEDY
LEASH LAW SIGNS
00361
001-400-2401-4305 00143 $45.69 10413
09945
32201
a
10413
12/12/89
ANIMAL CONIROL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$45.69
01/03/90
5
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $45.69
a
. R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 -61_36
00114
11L30/89
001-400-1101-4305 00285 $69.01 372-6186
C.LIY COUNCIL /OFFICE
01147
32202
5
$0_00
01/03/90
6
OPER SUPP* IES
6
R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY
MISC. CHARGES/NOV
Q0114
001-400-2101-4306 00730 $94.83 372-6186
01147
32202
6
89 —6186
11/30/89
POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE
$0 00
01/03/90
6
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $163.84
;.
61
61
R SO BAY FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC.
00786
001-400-2201-4315 00055 $150.00
ANNUAL DUES/1990
12/18/89
FIRE /MEMBERSHIP
08374
3220371
$0100
01/04/90
7
.
7:
7,
6
71
71
44
4
4
4,
4
4
3
91
5
5
3 J
4
6
7
a
9
la
16
4
5
7
z
4
a
7
8
D 4
3
..r
r_
0
3
3
1
37
30
40
41
42
4a
44
45
4
4
5
5
5
5
54
55
®' 56
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0040
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $150.00
c.
R SO BAY TRNG OFCRS DEPOSITORY 00614 001-400-2201-4315 00054 $300.00
ANNUAL DUES/FIRE 12/07/89 FIRE /MEi1BERSHIP
08367 32204
$Q-110_Q1/0319Q_
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $300.00
R SO CAL ASSOC OF CODE ENFORCE— 03186 001-400-4101-4315 00108 *15.00
DUES/P. SOUDI 12/04/89 PLANNING /MEMBERSHIP
08666 32205
$0.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $15.00
R SO CAL TRANING CENTER FOR 03069 001-400-2101-4312 01129 *30.00
TUITION/T. DOHLIN 12/04/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST
10217 32206
$0.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $30.00
R S0—CAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY 02196 001-400-4204-4309 01519 *406.83 A15505
LIGHTING FIXTURE 15505 12/12/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
08822 32207
*0.00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *406.83
R SOURISSEAU SUPPORT SERVICES 02075 001-400-2101-4201 00498 $1.380.00 1419/22/23/24
BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION 23/24 12/13/89 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
10195 32208
30 00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,380.00
R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER 00113 001-400-4204-4321 00477 $14.91 112060
MISC CHARGES/NOV 89 12060 11/30/89 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT
01148 32209
$0.00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $14.91
R SOUTH DAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-400-2101-4201 00501 $164.80
PRISONER EMERG SERV/P.D. 12/20/89 POLICE /CQNTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
10197 32210
$0 00 01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $164.80
R SOUTH BAY JUVENILE DIVERSION 01731 140-400-4705-4201 00004 $459.90
CDBG COSTS/OCT—NOV 89 12/28/89 - JUVENILE DIVSN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
08672 32211
$0:'00 01/04/90
3
t �1
2
3
3
} 3
t� 3
1
4
4
4
OF
'
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:25:43
*'
�. nSRI'ILJ.719 DGM1.f
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0041
DATE 01/04/90
°
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
°
*** VENDOR TOTAL+*******************+r**a*********************ax***********.*.*****.* $459.90
2
R
SOUTH DAY MUNICIPAL COURT
CITATION
00400
110-300-0000-3302 31037 $318.00
09960
32212
COURT BAIL
12/28/89
/COURT FINES/PARKING
$0.00
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $318.00
7
6
R
SOUTH BAY WELDERS
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
00018
11/30/89
001-400-2201-4309 00785 $32.96
FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
01151
$0 00
32213
01/04/90
R
SOUTH BAY WELDERS
MISC.
00018
001-400-3103-4309 00929 $107.50
01151
32213
CHARGES/NOV 89
11L30/89
SLMAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE_9AIERIALS
$0 00_0.1L04/90___-
3
°
R
SOUTH BAY WELDERS
MISC.
00018
001-400-3104-4309 00373 $117.19
01151
32213
CHARGES/NOV 89
11/30/89
TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$0.00
01/04/90
o
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $257.65
'
R
SOUTHERN ALUMINUM
FQLDING
03128
001-400-4601-5401 00024 $1.888.83
3500 09057
32214
TABLES/COMM RES 3300
11/28/89
COMM RESOURCES /EQUIP—LESS THAN $500
$1.588.29
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.888.83
1
'
R
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
ELEC
00159
001-400-3101-4303 00069 $47.05
01152
32215
BILLINGS/NOV 89
11/30/89
MEDIANS /UTII ITIEr'
6 I
/, 14/9,
R
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
00159
001-400-3104-4303 00034 $561.20
01152
32215
ELEC BILLINGS/NOV e9
11L3Q/89
TRAFFIC SAFETY !UTILITIES
MOO
01/04/90
R
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
00159
001-400-4204-4303 00351 $6.765.07
01152
32215
5
ELEC BILLINGS/NOV 89
11/30/89
BLDG MAI.NT /UTILITIES
$0.00
01/04/90
'
S
R
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
00159
001-400-6101-4303 00282 ' $1,504.18
01152
32215
5
ELEC BILLINGS[NOV 89
11/30/89
PARKS /UTILITIES
$Q_00
01/04/90
a
6
R
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
00159
105-400-2601-4303 00218 $222.03
01152
32215
a
ELEC BILLINGS/NOV 89
11/30/89
STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES
$0.00
01/04/90
6
6
R
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO:
00159
160-400-3102-4303 00120 $37.14
01152
32215
6
ELEC BILLINGS/NOV 89
11/30/89
SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES
$0.00
01/04/90
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
45
4
4
4
4
51
5
55
56
( 3•1041fe.+N4..;w.4o. MMN•w
U
3
4
a
7
a
10
1
J
13
14
15
18
19
0
1
J
4
27 J
2
3
,
J
3'J
2
5
7
of
2
3
5
7
6
0
2
75
J
33
3,
3:
3,
3e
3l
3a
30^,
4,
42
1]
'
" ,,,IlJRf DGIMUJ7
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0042
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************a************************* $9,136.67
'
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00217 $14,443.79
STREET LIGHT BILLS/NOV89 11/30/89 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES
00013
$0.00
32216
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** . $14.443.79
7
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00349 $420.30
GAS BILLINGS/NOV Q9 11/30/89 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES
01153
$0.00
32217
01/03/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $420.30
,
R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP 00146 001-400-4601-4305 00772 $47.89
WATER COOLER RENT/NOV 89 36190 11/30/89 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
1136190. 00033
$0.00
32218
01/04/90
%
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $47.89
3
R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00249 $2,348.00
SWEEPING SERV/NOV 89 2453 11/30/89 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
2453 00029
$0,00
2453 00029
$0.00
32219
01/03/90
32219
01/03/90
R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 110-400-3301-4201 00236 $2.941.00
SWEEPING SERV/NOV 89 2453 11/30/89 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SER.YICELPRI/AT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $5.489.00
R STATE OF CALIFORNIA 00364 001-400-2101-4251 00291 $74.00
FINGERPRINT SERV/OCT 89 75246 11/21/89 POLICE /CONTRACT SERYILELGOVT
875246 00023
$0.00
32220
01/04/90
2
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $74.00
R SUPREME SALES CO.. INC. 00494 001-400-2101-4306 00729 $317.33
PRISONER SUPPLIES 73538 12/06/89 NOSE /PRISONER_NAINTENANCE
73538 10181
$325_85
32221
01/03/90
e
e
e
a
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $317. 33
R TAK'S LAWNMOWER SALES & SERV. 00169 001-400-6101-4309 00793 $171.73
MISC CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
01156 32222
$_Q -12.0.____Q11.33/90
v
e
a
e
e
7
7
7
7
7
7
12
13
,4
15
16
20
24
25
3
3
4
4
5
52
3
5
7
0
2
3
7 )
2
3
4
4
''
2
=
8
yv Y—ry
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:25:43 ,• FOR 01/09/90
•4
PAGE 0043
DATE 01/04/90
'N
,
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
s
7
e
.
6
7
*** VENDOR TOTAL*•r•ir*******gra*****r•***************•r************•n****•r*****u•a•x•*** •a•*** $171. 73
9
,o
,2
"
17
R TIME BUSINESS FORMS 01516 001-400-4201-4305 00504 $134.57
INSPECTION FORMS/BLDG 45983 12/21/89 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
•
45983 10311
$134.57
32223
01/03/90
,3
14
,e
,6
a
20
„4
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $134.57
''7
'0
R CITY OF*TORRANCE 00841 145-400-3402-4201 00140 $335.11
SHARE OF EQUIP/COMM BUS 00598 12/18/89 COMMUTER BUS /CONTRACT SERVICES
100598 08670
$0.00
32224
01/03/90
2,
22
24
10
c
71
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $335. 11
25
26
27
26
.2
73
24
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 001-400-1212-4188 01585 $188.41
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00029
$0.00
32225
01/04/90
20
30
31
32
75
=e
77
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 105-400-2601-4188 00866 $1.52
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLQYEE BENEFITS
00029
$0 00
32225
OIL04/90
33
3s
36
L•
79
J0
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 145-400-3401-4188 00805 $0.94
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00029
$0 00
00029
$0.D0
32225
01/04/90
32225
01/04/90
37
30
38
40
41
43
44
31
3'
J7
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 145-400-3402-4188 00807 $0.38
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/99 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
,4
35
36
37
30
39
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 160-400-3102-4188 00808 $3.04
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN [EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00029
$0 00
32225
01/04/90
4 I
4r
46
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 705-400-1209-4188 00177 $3.17
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 I2LB/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00029
$0 f10
00029
$0_00
32225
A1/n4/90
32225
01/04/90
49
50
s,.
52
53
54
ss
se
40
41
42
-
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 705-400-1217-4188 00176 $3.17
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
43
44
45
%;
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $200.63
'
575/5
so.
60
46
47
4a
R TRAVER'S TREE SERVICE 00404 001-400-6101-4201 00163 $4.890.00
CITY—WIDE TREE TRIMMING 12/07/89 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
10051
$4.750.00
32226
01/03/90
Cl62
63
a4
40
so
5,
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $4.890.00
63
5145
67
66
s2_
73
74
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-2101-4311' 00768 $5.55
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
01158
*0.00
32227
01/04/90
60
71
72
55
7e
1117
. 6•
y
73
74
715 .
7,,
r,.,,r,.r,:.'P".rr..^�r!"'-^�t-r-*r,...,•,.,;..-�n.p,,.!nw...n-,r.n..•
J
J
J
J
J
J
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
•5
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
___-MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00123 001-400-2201-4309 00782
11/30/89 FIRE
00123 001-400-2401-4309 00131
11/30/89 ANIMAL CONTROL
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
00123 001-400-3103-4309 00928
11/30/89 ST MAINTENANCE
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
1]
=i
.57 14
:5
00123 001-400-3104-4309 0037
11/30/89 TRAFFIC SAFE
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
PAGE 0044
DATE 01/04/90
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$56. 19
/MAINTENANCE- MATERIALS
$2. 27
/MAINTENANCE tIATERJALS
$7. 43
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
1 $41. 59
TY /MAINTENANCE_MALERIALS
00123 001-400-4204-4309 01514
11/30/89___-__.._._._____-_ BLDG._MAINT._.__.-__
00123 001-400-4205-4309 00425
11/30/89
Jj
01158 32227
$0.00 01/04/90 ___.
01158 32227
$0 00-___01 /04/90_
01158 32227
$0.00 01 /04/90
01158 32227 z,
$0 00 01/04/90_____24
$379. 66
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$15.32
E /MAINIvNOE MATERIALS
EQUIP SERVICE
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
00123 001-400-6101-4309 00794
1.1 /30 /89PARKS--
______-_--__/MAINTENANCE _MATERIALS _
------ - --- -- ----'
$129. 82
01158
$0.00__
32227
01/04/90
01158 32227
$0 00 01/04L9Q_
00123 105-400-2601-4309 00555
11/30/89
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89
STREET LIGHTING
00123 110-400-3302-4305 00634
11/30/89 PARKING ENF
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123
MISC. CHARGES/NOV 89 11/30/89
$109. 23
01158 32227
___ $0. 00 __.-01/04/90_____
01158 32227
/MAINTENANC_E_IAZERIALS $0 00 0.1104L90
$7.74
/OFF_I CE_OPERSUPPL IES
160-400-3102-4309 00434
SEWER/ST DRAIN
$73. 66
/MAINT_ENANCg j1ATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL *************************•************************ *********•******* $828.46
01158 32227
$0.00_01/04/90
01158 32227
$0 0Q_Q1LQ4L90
R UNIFORCE CORPORATION
01720 001-400-1206-4201 00653 $988.50 900106
FUEL SYSMAINT/JAN_MAR 00106 I1/16/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SER!ICELER1V6T $.0 00_01L04/_9Q
00074 32228
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$988. 50
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89
001-400-1212-4188 01590
EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
5.1
54
75
6
$761. 72
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 105-400-2601-4188 00868
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 STREET LIGHTING
$24. 40
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00028 32229
$0 _00_01104/90
00028 32229
$0.00 01/04/90-__,__
E�41as•�lA:..if AAt,�IM-h.n... �...�L. A
'S6
16
5fl
60
61
62
63
64
61
66
67
66
/0
;t
72
iJ
/4
—1
/1
/6-
6
a
ia
'al:- Q^ I�
•ry;y�."Ili"'.�4 r. 1.�' i Y:l�'N,i 4.1 1
( 4, .; ; I re7;y'i.'ANT.U.4,.AAp
I'
1 V
Ci
cu
1
2
2
2
21
3
31
3
3
3
3
3
' FINANCE—SFA340 vDEMAND LISTVy^ yawn
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90
PAGE 0045
DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 110-400-3301-4188 00824 $0.80
______._.._.CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLPYEE_BENEFITS
00028 32229
$0.00_01/04/90
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 110-400-3302-4188 01076 $136.00
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENaFITS
00028 32229
$0..OQ_01L04L20
00028 32229
*0 00_01/04/20
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02333 145-400-3401-4188 00806' $4.48
'_ CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE_RENEFES
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 145-400-3402-4188 00808 $1.52
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00028 32229
$000 01/04/90
00028 32229
$0.00
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 145-400-3403-4188 00216 $0.48
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 155-400-2102-4188 00451 $2.00
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
_01t04L90
00028 32229
$0.00 01/04/90
00028 32229
$0 00 Q1/Q4/90
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 160-400-3102-4188 00810 $20.00
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 705-400-1209-4188 00179 $1.20
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00028 32229
$0.00 01/04/90
00028 32229
$Q___QO Oi/04/90
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 705-400-1217-4189 00178 $1.20
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 WORKERS CAMP /EMPLOYEE 9ENEEXIS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *953.80
R UNITED AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. 02697 001-400-1212-4188 01588 $80.00
CITY HEALTH INS/JAN 90 12/28/89 EME_ ENEEITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00065 32230
$0 00 01/04/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $80.00
R V & V MANUFACTURING 01938 001-400-1203-4201 00626 16192.76
EMPLOYEE PINS 9174 11.00/89 PERSQNNEL ON
/CTRACT SERVICELPRIVAT
9174
09724 32231
*151.50 iii/03/90
e
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $192.76
f
e
R KATHLEEN*VILLA 03188 001-400-4601-4201 00477 $65.00
CHRISTMAS ACTIVITY SERV 12/26/89 COMM ESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
10406 32232
*0 00 01/03/90
e
eR
e
J
7
7
•
7
7
0
41
4
43
44
45
4
4
4
51
52
3 J
5
6
7 J
e
9
10
11 J
12
14
5 J
16
10
19
20
21
22
23 J
24
25
2•
27
2
31 J
3
3
41
J
4 J
1 J
3
5
9
2
3
ee
7
10
0
2
3
5
11.
7
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340
/'
1
rm.= UURh
TIME 15:25:43 FOR 01/09/90 DATE 01/04/90
1N
2
'
3
_PAY_ _VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOVNT NUIIDER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK_#
4
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
°
1
n
7
6
0
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***********tura*** •****•a******************* ************************* $65. 00
,0
0
11
12
R PATRICK*VON WIEGANDT 02636 001-210-0000-2110 03445 $100.00 86945 10504 32233
13
11
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 86945 12/19/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 01/03/90 :.
4
,5
6
2
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.00
7
4
I9
IS
l0
20
R J.S.*WARD & CO. AS AGENT FOR 02466 705-400-1209-4324 00115 $6.154.89 09775 32234
21
17
16
REIMB LIAD CLAIMS/NOV 89 11/30/89 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS $0.00 01/03/90
2223
24
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $6.154.89
25
41.
26
21
27
25
22
R. CHARLES*WILHITE 02955 001-400-2101-4312 01134 $20.80 10220 32235
79
23
24
MILES/RECORDS CLASS 12/19/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST $0.00 01/04/90
3,
32
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.80
33
,1
34
27
35
36
-"
R STEVE*WISNIEWSKI 01364 001-400-2201-5401 00016 $426.99 08373 32236
3
TV/VCR/TRAINING/FIRE 12/26/89 FIRE /EQUIP—LESS THAN $500
36
30
$0.00 01/03/90
30
40
3,
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $426.99
41
32
42
'3
43
44
—1-
14
R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-4201 00605 $14.83 23059669 09277 32237
45
3]
76
COPIER METER USE/NOV 89 59669 12/11/89 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/04/90
46
47
46
37
R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00199 $321.83 523979545 00049 32237
49
36
39
LEASE PMT/DEC 89 79545 12/02/89 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 01/03/90
50
5,
52
4J
R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00200 $945.93 523979080 00048 32237
53
41
LEASE PMT/DEC 89 79080 12/02/89 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 01/03/90
55
42
56
A3
R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00201 $238.72 523979544 00050 32237
57
44
LEASE PMT/DEC 89 79544 12/02/89 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS ' $0.00 01/03/90
59
43
eo
46
.,R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-2201-6900 00096 $47.74 523979541 00053 32237
61
47
LEASE PMT/DEC 1989 79541 12/01/89 FIRE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 01/04/90
63
46
64
49
R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-2401-6900 00051 $56.15 523979542 00051 32237
65
50
LEASE PMT/DEC 89 79542 12/01/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 01/04/90
6667 67
60
52
69
53
70
54
71
72
55
73
56
74
7
75
7
.j►
J
J
..,
J
J
J
6
w
;;;
r—•
•
FINANCE—SFA34
It
.4.112::"..-1•,;8•1'?"1,r877:15111111',.11!)rrAtnir.1•181y6 I'
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
•
' 3_
°
i 3
uulnrvu L11
TIME 15:25:43 ---PAG 0047
FOR 01/09/90 DATE 01/04/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER
2
TRN # AMOUNT INVLREF P Q--#___CEX
DESCRIPTION #
DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
°
6
7
10
O
R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-4601-6900 00052 $189.65 • 523979543 00052 32237
LEASE PMT/DEC 89 79543 12/01/89 COMM RESOURCES /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 01/04/90
,I
R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 110-400-3302-6900 00136 $114.40 523979542 00051 32237
12
13
1:
'3
LEASE PMT/DEC 89 79542 12/01/89 � PARKING ENF /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 01/04/90
15
/ 1,
*** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************.*******************+t********** $1,929.25
17
18
IS
ID
'17
R ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 01206 001-400-3104-5499 00029 $1,767.83 12538/12120 10012 32238
20
21
6
STOP SIGNS/REFLECTIVE 12120 11/30/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /NON—CAPITALIZED ASSETS $1,767.37 01/03/90
23
•
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,767.83
24
25
26
z,
27
*** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $288,337.31
28
20
30
:4
31
*** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** $978,989.81
32
33
34
7725
35
36
.n
► HL EBY CL RT1rY HAT THE DEMANDS O,,//R,,CLAIMS COVERED BY.
37
3C
THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGE17TO. NCLUSIVE OF, TNB
WARRANT REGISTER FOR 049 q p
30
_ AREAL'S:UR u.. ac
AND FUND ARE ILABLE FOR PAYMENT THEREOF:
41
42
37
BY
43
Ja
FINANCLADMINISTRATOR
a4
J6
DATE 1/4/9,0
45
46
36
47
37
30
46
49
30
39
5,
40
41
32
63
54
4'
56
56
4]
44
67
45
38
,a
a7
6600
61
62
40
63 ..
a0
SO
64
65
66
31
67
32
SJ
68
69
70
34
71..
77
72
73
56
74
'Z.7i
76
7,
p71
•
G
i
J
J
J
J
•
CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - NOVEMBER 1989
FUND GENERAL
NUMBER ACCOUNT
11/1/89
BALANCE
CASH
ADJUSTMENTS
WARRANTS
ADJUSTMENTS
11/30/89
BALANCE
001 GENERAL
105 LIGHTING DISTRICT
110 PARKING
115 STATE GAS TAX
120 COUNTY GAS TAX
125 PARK REC.FAC.TAX
126 RAILROAD RT.OF WAY
127 6% UTILITY USERS TAX
130 REVENUE SHARING
140 CDBG
145 PROPOSITION A FUND
150 GRANT FUND
155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT
160 SEWER MAINTENANCE
170 POLICE ASSET SEIZURE
180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND
705 SELF INSURANCE FUND
TRUST
ACCOUNTS
$2,223,668.72
1,265,043.63
229,780.27
359,041.04
16,682.51
1,645,304.36
1,666,129.27
110,116.30
-0-
118,662.02
353,365.56
32,046.49
30,820.25
1,370,530.94
104,934.67
292 ,748.39
484,040.65
10,302,915.07
$ 555,716.42
1,463.58
156,747.71
19,350.29
- 0-
- 0-
74,087.62
111,131.41
- 0-
-0-
486.00
-0-
267.27
663.00
3,454.41
4,486.00
-0-
$ 927,853.71
$157,112.04
6,207.97
1,162.61
2,178.60
81.87
8,074.03
- 0-
540.38
- 0-
582.31
1,734.08
5,522.93
151.24
102,981.55
514.95
1,436.61
77,306.23
$ 365,587.40
$ 692,105.90
37,731.11
87,789.41
-0-
- 0-
2,116.77
- 0-
- 0-
- 0-
1,558.83
6,313.01
24,999.37
4,830.92
11,623.81
25,967.88
7,121.62
43,986.78
$ 946,145.41
$ 107,965.46
2,005.39
119,311.01
3,939.33
4,000.00
416.67
-0-
112,897.58
-0-
-0-
104.46
-0-
556.00
3,152.06
1,298.88
27.00
9,913.56
$ 365,589.40
$2,136,425.82
1,232,978.68
180,590.17
376,630.60
12,764.38
1,650,844.95
1,740,216.89
108,890.51
-0-
117,685.50
349,168.17
12,570.05
25,851.84
1,459,399.62
81,637.27
291,522.38
507,446.54
$10,284,623.37
BALANCE
RECEIVED
PAID
BALANCE
STATEMENT
BALANCE
PAYROLL
$ 8,315,979.88
INACTIVE DEPOSIT
$2,168.51
$1,644,363.76 $4,876 563.05
INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY !FISCAL AGENT
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY
$387,635.16
INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE
$561,058.23 $560,816.78
$2,409.96
RY B C , ITY TREASUR R
DECEMBER 14, 1989
GENERAL $
PAYROLL
OUTSTANDING CHECKS
INACTIVE DEPOSIT
BALANCE
511,690.36
3,336.56
515,026.92
188,337.23
326,689.69
9,960,343.64
10,287,033.33
1d(&
December 18, 1989
Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting
the City Council January 9, 1990
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF
INVESTMENT POLICY FOR
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Recommendation
It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution
relative to the Annual Statement of Investment Policy for the
city of Hermosa Beach for the year 1990.
On January 1, 1985 the governor signed Chapter 1226 legislation
into law requiring that local public agencies file an Annual
Statement of Investment Policy.
The 1990 Hermosa Beach City Treasurer's investment policy will
comply with Government Code Section 53600 thru 53659, which
governs municipal investments in the State of California.
The California Government Code provides a large menu of legally
allowed public fund investment opportunities. I have attempted
to tailor this investment policy to reflect the council's
investment personality, while continuing to strive for maximum
return on investment funds.
Safety of principle is my first priority. I am pleased to
announce that our 1989 investment portfolio has generated
$740,512.21, or a 9.02% yield this year, compared to a 7.5%
year to date return on U.S. Treasury Bill. ;
This year I have requested authorization to invest in:
1. Time Certificates of Deposit
2. U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes, and Bonds
3. Bankers Acceptances
4. California State Local Agency Investment Fund
5. Los Angeles County Pool Investment Fund
The attached 1990 investment policy resolution is respectfully
submitted for your review.
Respectfully submitted,
.1/t.r)4I4
Gary L. Br tsch
City Treasurer
NOTED:
evin B. Nort'craft
City Manager
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION W. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL STATEMENT OF
INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE YEAR 1990
WHEREAS, the California State Legislature passed legislation
during the 1984 session requiring the filing of an annual
Statement of Investment Policy by local public agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California signed such
legislation into law effective January 1, 1985 (Chapter 1226);
and
WHEREAS, the City Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach
declares the annual Statement of Investment Policy to be as
follows:
PURPOSE: This statement is intended to provide a guideline for
the prudent investment of temporary idle cash, trust funds and
restricted monies and to outline a policy for maximizing the
efficiency of the cash management system. Ultimate investment
goals include the enhancement of economic status and the
protection of pooled cash investments.
OBJECTIVE: The cash management system of the City of Hermosa
Beach is designed to accurately monitor and forecast expenditures
and revenues, thus insuring the investment of monies to the
fullest extent possible. Attempts to obtain highest interest
yields possible are statement of fact as long as investments meet
the criteria required for safety and liquidity.
POLICY: The City of Hermosa Beach operates its investment
program with State and self-imposed constraints. It does not buy
stocks; it does not speculate; it does not deal in futures,
options or security loan agreements. Longer term investments
(over one year) are generally limited to maturities of 3 years or
less, but will never exceed five years.
Criteria for selecting investments and the absolute order of
priority are:
1. Safety
2. Liquidity
3. Yield
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The City's investment philosophy is to insure the safety of
principle and to provide money when needed. A high dollar yield
on investments, though important, ranks third in the priority of
investment strategy.
Depository Services
Money must be deposited in state or national banks, state or
federal savings associations, or state or federal credit unions
in the state. It may be in inactive deposits, active deposits or
interest-bearing active deposits. The deposits cannot exceed the
amount of the bank's or savings and loan's paid up capital and
surplus.
We require that each financial institution submit current
financial statements which are evaluated prior to the investment
of funds. We use the following criteria:
The institution must have been in business at least three
years.
The institution must submit audited financial statements.
In addition, examination is made of the Reserve for Loan
Losses category to evaluate the financial trend of the
institution's asset base.
Whenever possible, the use of several years' financial data
is evaluated to present a trend of activity in the
institution.
We also require that interest be paid to the City on a monthly
basis (current state law only requires quarterly payment).
Authorized Investments
Generally, investments shall be made in the context of "prudent
man" rule, which states that,
"investments shall be made with judgement and care, under
circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence,
discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of
their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment,
considering the probable safety of their capital as well as
the probable income to be derived."
The City is further governed by the California Government Code,
Sections 53600 et seq. Within the context of these limitations,
the following investments are authorized, as further limited
herein:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TCD's (Time Certificates of Deposits) which are insured for
$100,00.0 by FDIC or FSLIC or fully collateralized as required
by state law if over $100,000 are purchased. Not more than
5% of the City's portfolio is invested in any one insitu-
tion. Time Certificates of Deposits are safekept in a
legally acceptable safekeeping account. An institution must
meet the following criteria to be considered by the City:
1. The institution must be located in California.
2. The institution must have current financial
information, signed contract and waiver on file
with the City.
3. The institution must maintain a net worth to asset
ratio of at least 5%, and have a positive earnings
record.
4. The institution must be at least 3 years old.
5. For collateralized investments, the institution must
have at'least $100 million in assets. Acceptable
collateral is 110% of the public fund account in
government securities.
U. 8. TREASURY's are direct obligations of the United States
Government.
U.B. TBILLS are issued weekly with maturity dates up to
one year. They are issued and traded on a discount
basis and the interest is figured on a 360 day basis,
actual number of days. They are issued in amounts of
$10,000 and up, in multiples of $5,000. They are a
highly liquid security.
U.S. TNOTES are initially issued with two to ten year
maturities. They are actively traded in a large
secondary market and are very liquid. The Treasury may
issue note issues with a minimum of $5,000.
BANKERS ACCEPTANCES are negotiable time drafts drawn to
finance the export, import, shipment or storage of goods, and
they are termed "Accepted" when a bank guarantees to pay the
face value at maturity. A Banker's Acceptance constitutes an
irrevocable obligation of the accepting bank and a contingent
obligation of the drawer and of any endorsees whose names
appear upon it. The bank is protected by its customer's
agreement to provide the necessary funds in advance of the
maturity of the Acceptance and also by the pledge of
documents such as bills of lading, independent warehouse of
terminal receipts, and other documents evidencing ownership
and the insurance of the goods so financed.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Cities and other local agencies are authorized to purchase
Banker's Acceptances subject to several restrictions. First,
the Banker's Acceptance must be eligible for purchase by
Federal Reserve Systems. Second, purchases of Banker's
Acceptances must not exceed two hundred seventy (270) days'
maturity or 40% of the City's surplus money invested under
Sections 53601 and/or 53635. Finally, no more than 5% of the
agency's surplus funds may be invested in the Banker's
Acceptances of any one commercial bank (Government Code
Sections 53601(f), 53635(f).
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND is a special fund in the State
Treasury which local agencies may use to deposit funds for
investment. There is no minimum investment period and the
minimum transaction is $5,000, in multiples of $1,000 above
that, with a maximum of $5,000,000 for any agency. The City
is restricted to a maximum of eight transactions per month.
It offers high liquidity because deposits can be converted to
cash in twenty-four hours and no interest is lost. All
interest is distributed to those agencies participating on a
proportionate share determined by the amounts deposited
and the length of time they are deposited. Interest is
paid quarterly via a check or warrant.
The State keeps an amount for reasonable costs of making the
investments, not to exceed one-quarter of one percent of the
earnings.
The interest rates are fairly high because of the pooling of
the State surplus cash with the surplus cash deposited by
local governments. This creates a multi -billion dollar money
pool and allows diversified investments. In a high interest
rate market, we do better than LAIF, but in times of low
interest rates, LAIF yields are higher. The City continually
invests in the Local Agency Investment Fund (Government Code
Section 16429).
LOS ANGELES COUNTY POOL INVESTMENT FUND California Government
Code ("Government Code") Section 53684 allows local agencies
in the County of Los Angeles (the "County") to deposit
excess funds in the Los Angeles County Treasury Pool for the
purpose of investment by the Treasurer and Tax Collector of
the County (the "Treasurer") pursuant to Government Code
Sections 53601 and 53635;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The County keeps an amount for reasonable costs of making the
investments, not to exceed 16 basis points per month. The
number of monthly transactions are not restricted.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
That an annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of
Hermosa Beach has been filed by the City Treasurer for calendar
year 1990 in compliance with Section 53646 (A) of the Government
Code of the State of California.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF JANUARY 1990.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California.
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM•
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
December 14, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 9, 1989
AWARD OF AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES,
COMMUNITY CENTER ELECTRICAL UPGRADE, CIP 89-613
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council:
1. Authorize the Mayor to sign the attached agreement for
Engineering Services for Community Center Electrical Upgrade
to John Snyder and Associates at a cost of $ 5,880.
2. Authorize staff to issue addenda within budget limitations.
Background:
Deficiencies of the existing electrical system in the Community
Center Theatre have led to problems including power outages,
especially during performances that require extra stage
equipment. In addition, the Community Center buildings were
constructed as early as 1935 and a thorough inspection of the
existing electrical system is needed.
On September 26, 1989, City Council authorized staff to request
proposals for engineering services on this project. The work
involves identifying deficiencies of the various electrical
systems within the Community Center buildings and submitting a
report on how to correct those electrical deficiencies.
Analysis:
Four proposals were received by the due date of November 13,
1989:
1. John Snyder & Associates
2. Dalan Engineering
3. Nikolakopolus & Associates
4. Lima & Associates
All proposals are available for
Clerk.
Proposed Amounts
$ 5,880
$ 12,000
$ 15,000
$ 22,650
review in the Office
of the City
All four firms specialize in electrical engineering and are
qualified to do the work. Refer to Attachment "A" for a
comparison of the firms.
- 1 -
N
Staff recommends awarding an agreement to John Snyder &
Associates for the following reasons:
1. John Snyder & Associates is the only firm within the budgeted
amount of $ 8,000.
2. John Snyder & Associates has performed work to the City's
satisfaction on previous projects at the Community Center and
City Hall.
Fiscal Impact:
Proposed Amount $ 5,880
Contingency _ 2,120
Not -to -Exceed Amount $ 8,000
FY 89-90 Budget $ 8,000
Funding Source: General Fund
Alternatives:
Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council
are:
1. Drop this project.
2. Award the agreement to a different consultant.
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian Gengler
Assistant Engineer
Noted For Fiscal Impact:
&t:
Viki Copeland
Director of Finance
ty/cce
-a —
Concur:
Lynam' A . Terry
Deputy City Engineer
An ny Antich
Director of Publ
Works
evin B. Northc :ft
City Manager
Alana Mastrian-Handman
Director of Community Resources
- 2 -
..;.,...,.44
ATTACHMENT ItA”
CIP 89-613
COMMUNITY CENTER ELECTRICAL UPGRADE
COMPARISON OF CONSULTANTS FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
Consultant
Snyder
Dalan
Nikolak-
opolus
Lima
Bid Amount
$ 5,880
$ 12,000
$ 15,000
$ 22,650
Estimated Time(hrs.)
84
130
?
470
Composite Hourly Rate
$ 70.00
$ 92.30
?
$ 48.19
Within Budget?
YES
NO
NO
NO
Registered Engineer?
YES
YES
YES
YES
Previous Theatre
Experience?
YES
NO
YES
NO
ty/ccea
3
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
COMMUNITY CENTER ELECTRICAL UPGRADE, CIP 89-613
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 9th day
of January , 1990 by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a
Municipal Corporation hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and
John Snyder & Associates , hereinafter
referred to as "CONSULTANT".
W ITNESSET H:
WHEREAS, CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform
(description of work) as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached
hereto and incorporated herein and by this reference made a part
hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. CITY agrees to retain CONSULTANT to perform services as
herein set forth.
2. CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to com-
plete in a manner satisfactory to CITY the services set forth in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein
and made a part hereof.
3. All information, data, reports and records and maps as
are existing and available from CITY, and necessary for carrying
out the work outlined in Exhibit "A" shall be furnished to CON-
SULTANT without charge by CITY and CITY shall cooperate in every
way reasonable in the carrying out of the work without delay.
- 1 -
�- .. _,..,..o- a_.____i;.a..4._ ____ __,• _ .a.a.�_4.._ N4..:4 _
4. CONSULTANT represents that it employs, or will employ
at is own expense all personnel required in performing the ser-
vices required under this Agreement.
5. All of the services required hereunder will be per-
formed by CONSULTANT or under its direct supervision, and all
personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall
be authorized or permitted under state and local law to perform
such services.
6. CITY's Director of Public Works (the "Director" or his
designee) shall direct the CONSULTANT to proceed and the work
required shall be completed within the time limit mutually agreed
upon. CONSULTANT shall have no claim for compensation for any
services upon which the Director has not authorized CONSULTANT to
proceed.
7. The CONSULTANT shall work closely and cooperate fully
with the Director, or his designee, who shall be the liaison
between CONSULTANT and the CITY and who shall review and approve
all details of the work as it progresses.
8. The CITY reserves the right to terminate or suspend
the Agreement at any time upon seven (7) days written notice ef-
fected by personal delivery or by a bona fide mail service, which
shall be deemed communicated as of the date of receipt thereof,
under any of the following circumstances but not limited to:
(a) The project, as described in the attached Exhibit
"A", is to be abandoned or indefinitely postponed.
(b) CONSULTANT fails to prosecute the work within the
time limits specified in the attached Exhibit "A".
(c) Unsatisfactory performance by CONSULTANT.
9. No change in the scope of the work to be performed by
CONSULTANT shall be made except in writing between CITY and CON-
SULTANT, which shall set forth the changes mutually agreed upon
by the CITY and the CONSULTANT.
10. In accordance with State Compensation Laws, the
CONSULTANT shall carry Worker's Compensation insurance for all
persons employed in the performance of services as set forth
herein. The CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with a certificate
verifying such coverage or endorsement acceptable to the CITY
before commencing services under this Agreement. Such policy
shall require thirty (30) days notice to the CITY in writing
prior to cancellation, termination, or expiration of any kind.
11. The CONSULTANT shall carry General Liability insurance
in an amount of not less than $500,000. The CONSULTANT shall
provide the City with certificates verifying such coverage or
endorsement acceptable to the City before commencing services
under this Agreement. Such policy shall require thirty (30) days
notice to the City in writing prior to cancellation, termination
or expiration of any kind.
12. If CONSULTANT fails to maintain such insurance, the
CITY may obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount
of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this
Agreement.
13. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limit-
ing in any way the extent to which CONSULTANT may be held respon-
sible to payment of damages to persons or property resulting from
- 3 -
a.i: w,jl:,vt _• .:...r:,iSw'LaL.:J�. �.�_ ..� .:�.+P... :-...e..:,....+ .a.:
its operations or any operations of any subcontractors under it.
CONSULTANT shall idemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers
and employees from any claims, damages, or expenses, including
attorney's fees and court costs, arising out of CONSULTANT'S
negligent performance under this agreement.
14. In the event that legal action is commenced to enforce
or declare the rights created under this Agreement, the prevail-
ing party shall be entitled to an award of costs and reasonable
attorney's fees in the amount to be determined by the court.
15. The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or
any part of the work performed under this Agreement at the rates
and in the manner establishedin the attached Exhibit "A".
16. This Agreement shall begin upon execution and shall
expire on the date shown on the Notice to Proceed unless extended
in writing by mutual agreement of both CITY and CONSULTANT.
17. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and
assigns of the parties, but it shall not be assigned by the CON-
SULTANT without the written consent of the CITY.
18. The CONSULTANT shall not assign any interest in this
Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same
(whether by assignment or otherwise) without the prior written
approval of the CITY, provided, however, that claims for money
due or to become due the CONSULTANT from the CITY under this
Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other
financial institution or to a Trustee in Bankruptcy, without such
approval. Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be
furnished promptly to the CITY.
4
mss+,..• -« ..I+:,�r1�Aa,....Nwrt.7f..9a+.a:..c�.+. aLz...�a �w..
19. No member of the governing body of the CITY and no
other officer, employee, or agent of the CITY who exercises any
functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and
carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial
interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and the CONSUL-
TANT shall take appropriate steps to assure compliance.
20. The CONSULTANT covenants that he presently has no
interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect,
which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance
of his services hereunder. The CONSULTANT further covenants that
in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such
interest shall be employed.
21. This agreement supercedes any and all other agreements,
either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with
respect to the employment of CONSULTANT by CITY and contains all
the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to
such employment in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this
Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements,.
promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by
any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not
embodied herein, and that no other agreement or amendment hereto
shall be effective unless executed in writing and signed by both
CITY and CONSULTANT.
22. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all ap-
plicable federal statutes and regulations as amended.
23. The invalidity in whole or part of any provision of
5
a . + ;.. _ ..., .,. z _«r r _ . =.rte �r..r ......0 _ ,_,;i �. At. mAhlw; :1 -ac .. isalt t
this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable
federal statutes and regulations as amended.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement on the date and year first above written.
ATTEST:
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
A Municipal Corporation
By:
MAYOR, City of Hermosa Beach
By:
CONSULTANT
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONSULTANT
Exhibit "A"
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES,
COMMUNITY CENTER ELECTRICAL UPGRADE, CIP 89-613
ENGINEERING SERVICES
The consultant shall provide professional engineering services
for preliminary engineering on upgrading the electrical systems
in the Community Center Buildings.
The scope of service shall include, but is not limited to. the
following minimum tasks:
1. Meet with the City as required to identify and establish
both code requirements and City needs, both present and
projected, for the electrical systems.
2. Conduct a complete survey of existing electrical systems
throughout the Community Center Buildings and determine where
existing and future deficiencies are located.
3. Coordinate with Southern California Edison to determine
requirements for electric services.
4. Prepare a written report discussing the identified
deficiencies, needs and requirements while at the same time
providing alternatives for design and/or
other recommendations.
5. Submit preliminary construction cost estimates for each
design alternative.
6. Take footcandle readings throughout the buildings to
determine if light levels are adequate.
7. Check electrical energy consumption and demand to determine
if there are any unusual costs that could be corrected.
8. All work shall be completed within the time limits specified
and mutually agreed upon, as shown on the Notice to Proceed.
AGREEMENT COSTS
The above services shall be performed on an hourly basis with a
maximumlimit of $ 5,880.00 (Five Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty
Dollars). A breakdown of costs is as follows:
Engineer 72 hours @ $ 75.00 per hour = $ 5,400.00
Draftsman 12 hours @ $ 40.00 per hour = $ 480.00
December 28, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the City -Council - -January 9, 1990 -
HOPE CHAPEL LEASE AGREEMENT
(ROOM 13 RENEWAL)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve the attached lease
agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel.
BACKGROUND
Hope Chapel has been a tenant in the Community Center since
September, 1986.
ANALYSIS
The attached lease conforms to the present square footage lease
rate policy and all other conditions remain the same.
Respectfully submitted,
Marsha Ernst
Administrative Aide
Dept. of Community Resources
Concur:
Mar C Rooney, Acting Director
Deet. of Community Resources
evin B. Northcr ft
City Manager
1
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Administrator
HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT
This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the
9th day of January
19 90 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal
Corporation (City) and Hope Chapel (Lessee).
A. RECITALS:
1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service
facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com-
munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility").
2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed
restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February
1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School
District and is further subject to certain provisions
imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop-
ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for
Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th
day of February 1978. These documents are on file in
the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public
documents and by reference are incorporated into this
leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD
and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS.
3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on
the terms and conditions set out herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period
of One (1) year commencing on the 1st day
of February ,1990 , and ending on the
31st day of January ,1991
2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from
the City that portion of the facility described as:
Room 13 (1,288 sq. ft) Community Center
3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac-
cording to the following schedule:
Feb. 1, 1990 through June 30, 1990 ($.74 sq. ft.)
$953 per month. July 1, 1990 through January 31, 1991:
According to policy approved by Advisory Commission.
Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease
commences on a day other than the first day of the
month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement
of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the
remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay-
ment on the first day of the following month.
1
3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi-
tions are agreed to by the Lessee:
1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls,
ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's
written consent.
2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained
upon or attached to the outside of the premises except
such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such
signs shall be in accordance with the policy established
by the Lessor.
3. All window dressing shall be approved by the City of
Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources.
4. See attached addendum.
4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the
following purpose or purposes: meeting room
And for no other purpose without the express written consent
of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be
used in violation of the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those
agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa
Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and
Urban Development.
5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at
all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive
General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee
in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to
any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any
one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com-
bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name
City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected
officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional
insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the
sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must
include the coverage and provisions indicated.
Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of
insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times
during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to
be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and
should state clearly:
(1) The additional insured requested;
(2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation
to the City of Hermosa Beach;
(3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional
2
Insured;
(4) Coverage included;
(5) Cross -liability clause.
WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and
maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work-
er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur-
nish the City with a certificate showing proof of such
coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or material-
ly changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to:
City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach.
INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated
(B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide.
6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE.
Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con-
dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon
termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les-
see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or
alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear
and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de-
mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event
of a violation of this provision.
7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al-
terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the
premises without the expressed written approval of the City.
Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the
City from potential liens of labor and material persons.
8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR
BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City
has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the
event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises.
The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem-
ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and
effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during
said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc-
tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to
the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes
intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion
determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then
either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi-
nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each
other.
9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify
the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim
or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or
death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di-
rect or indirect act or any omission of the lessee, its of-
ficers, agents and employees arising out of the lessee's use
of said premises. The Lessee, at its own cost, expense and
risk shall defind any and all actions, suits or other pro-
ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City
3
on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment
that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action,
suit, or legal proceedings as a result of hereof. _
10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to
comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com-
munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City
Council.
11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any
and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any
governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises.
12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur-
suant to this lease within three days after written notice
from the City or to perform any other obligation required
pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after
notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease
to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue
all remedies available under the laws then existent in the
State of California.
13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur-
suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal-
ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States
mail, postage prepaid,
LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CITY HALL
1315 VALLEY DRIVE
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254
LESSEE: HOPE CHAPEL
2420 Pacific Coast Hwy.
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
213 374 -HOPE
Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this
paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the
deposit thereof in the United States mail.
14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any
action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this
lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion
of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its
attorneys fees.
15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or
sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ-
ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de-
nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City.
16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is
binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of
the parties.
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF., the parties have executed this Hermosa
Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on
the day first hereinaboveset forth.
ATTEST:
AP? ED S TO FO
.10 Ogr
`CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a
Municipal Corporation, Lessor
By
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: LESSEE:
Pastor, Hope Chapel
December 20, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the City Council January 9, 1990
SUMMER, 1990 PRO VOLLEYBALL
RECOMMENDATION
The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and
Staff recommend that Council approves the following two (2)
requests for Professional Beach Volleyball Tournaments to be held
on the Pier Courts in the summer, 1990:
DATE GROUP TOURNAMENT PRIMARY SPONSOR
7/28-7/29 C E Sports & Women's Diet Pepsi
Entertainment Professional
8/25-8/26 Association of
Volleyball
Professionals
Men's Miller Lite
Professional
It is further recommended that Council instruct staff to draft
contracts for each tournament based on our Pro Volleyball Rules
and Regulations and authorize Mayor to sign.
BACKGROUND
The City of Hermosa Beach has hosted numerous professional beach
volleyball tournaments through the years including those listed
above. The Women's Pro Tournament has a two (2) year history in
the City while the Men's Pro has been in Hermosa Beach for seven
(7) years.
Last year, the City approved permits for seven (7) commercially
sponsored volleyball events. Typically, these requests are
reviewed in March or April but with the increased professionalism
of beach volleyball (i.e. television coverage) these groups are
requesting earlier approvals. It is expected, however, that more
requests for 1990 are forthcoming.
If approved, the tournaments will be subject to our Special Event
Ordinance (see attached) and will pay permit fees of $3,000. each
to the City in addition to film permit and co-sponsor fees as
applicable. All City services (i.e. police, parking) rendered
will be charged to the tournament organizers. Attached for your
reference are the City's Rules and Regulations for Pro Volleyball
Tournaments and a list of the 1990 summer beach activities
scheduled to date. At their December 4th meeting, the Parks,
Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission
recommended approval of these tournaments.
1
ANALYSIS
Both C. E. Sports and Entertainment (a special event marketing
firm) and the Association of Volleyball Professionals
(representatives of professional volleyball players --male) have
presented successful and safe events in Hermosa Beach in the
past. In both cases, they have demonstrated willingness to abide
by all City requirements and requests.
It is noteworthy that out of last year's seven pro tournaments,
not a single negative incident occurred. These tourneys provide
well attended, positive events for the community in addition to
bringing substantial business to downtown merchants. With your
approval, Hermosa Beach will remain "on the map" as one of the
top venues for beach volleyball on the west coast.
Concur:
e-af/
evin B. Norther' ft
City Manager
2
Respectfully submitted,
Mary CyRooney
Ac i.ng Director
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION C.C. 89-5327
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH ADOPTING FEES
AND CHARGES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS HELD IN THE CITY ON CITY PROPERTY.
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on December
14, 1989 to consider adopting fees and charges; and
WHEREAS, the City Council strives to equitably administer
major events held within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council makes every effort to recoup costs
reasonably borne.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach does adopt the following fees and charges:
Commercial Groups: Public Outdoor areas
& Misc. Facilities Minimum $1,500per day
Non -Profit Groups: Public Outdoor Areas
& Misc. Facilities $1 per participant &
spectator
Non -Profit Groups: Pass Thrus $100 Permit Fee
Non -Profit Groups: Fundraising/Parks $ 25 Permit Fee
Hermosa Beach.
Residents: Block Parties
Filming:
$ 25 Permit Fee
30 Amplification
Fee
Commercial $700/day Location Fee
$300 Permit Fee
$ 10/day parking
meters
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23'
24
25
26
27
28
Still Photography: Commercial
ATTEST:
$ 50 Permit Fee
$ 50/day Location
Fee.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED thisl4th day of
NO •.• :ER , 1 989
Lai/ / A
•RE'V)ENT :f - t Counci , and
MAYOR of the Ci y of Hermosa Beach, California
ITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
O 1 Vee240 CITY ATTORNEY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH )
I, KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk of the City
Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 89-5327 was duly and
regularly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Hermosa Beach at a Regular meeting of said Council
at the regular meeting place thereof on November 14, 1989.
The vote was as follows:
AYES: Rosenberger; Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Creighton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
DATED: November 21, 1989
Aetzt
City Clerk
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PRO VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT(S)
RULES AND REGULATIONS
FEES
Permit fee shall be negotiated by both parties with minimum
amount set at $1,500 per day.
A non-refundable application processing fee of $500 will be
required for all pro tournament requests. The deposit will be
applied toward the $3,000 permit fee and will be refunded only
if the permit request is denied by the City.
All predetermined costs fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the
Tournament.
All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of the
event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from
the City.
SECURITY
The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the
immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be
staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach
Police Department and one representative of the sponsor and/or
its event promotion firm.
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide no less than ten
security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable
uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other Tournament
staff.
A representative of the security staff shall meet with the
Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the
Tournament for a pre -event briefing.
The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for
informing spectators of the City's alcohol ordinance.
The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Police Officers for the
event as follows for each day of tournament, 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM:
1 Sergeant
4 Officers
or as many officers as deemed necessary by Public Safety
Director.
Cost of officers shall be assumed by the event promotion
firm/sponsor.
•
-.. {fir: 1`r;., �, .....�.. t '!�` � ....... A2 7� ,i� .F_ �i
CLEAN-UP ..
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide a professional
maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the
Tournament:
. The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street.-
. Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue.
The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the
trash col_ected outside the City each day of the Tournament.
All maintenance work is to be concluded by 8:00 p.m. each
evening.
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide additional trash
recepticals at the following locations:
. Beach (impacted area)
. Strand (impacted area)
. Parking Lots B and C
. Railroad Right-of-way
or additional trash receptacles as needed
LCS ,NGE`.ES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SE?VICES
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall. assume all costs for two �E)
additional lifeguards each day of tournament.
INSURANCE
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide the CITY a Certificate
of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, and
County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as
additional insured with a minimum coverage of $1 million combined
single limit coverage.
Event promotion firm/sponsor agrees to defend, indemnify, and
hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against
any and all liabilty and expense, including defense costs and
legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission
of the event promotion firm/sponsor its agents, officers and
employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily
injury, death and property damage.
CO-SPONSORS
A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with
each co-sponsor permitted one display booth.
�r YV �S21 f .f.• -rr' yr.rilt.o',
ADVERTISING
Signage regarding the CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required
of the event promotion firm/sponsor. City staff shall determine
criteria for size, wording and locations for posting.
City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be
posted for tournament. Cost of installation shall be the
responsibility of the event promotion firm/sponsor.
CIT: shall permit event promotion firm/sponsor to display two
large replicas of their product. City staff shall have final
approval of said replicas and determine location.
Ir. ne event of an alcohol sponsor, event promotion firm/sponsor
shall be required to make two C2) announcements per hour
informing spectators of the CITY'S alcoholic beverage ordinance.
All sponsor signs, props, product facsimilies, etc. deemed
necessary by event promotion firm/sponsor to identify the event,
shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will
not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain
constitutional rights of event promotion firm/sponsor.
PARK:NG
1
Event promotion firm/sponsor snail be required to post signs
throuznout the impacted area as well as at major ingress roads to
the CITY indicating 1) where there is free parking and 2) that
the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking
regulations.
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide a shuttle bus service
from a major satellite point(s) on the outskirts of or outside of
Hermosa Beach.
The City shall provide four (4) reserve officers to direct
traffic at locations to be determined by the Hermosa Beach Police
Department.
SPECIAL EVENTS
The CITY shall review all requests for any special events
requested to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall
have the right to deny all requests.
MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event
with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors.
If the event promotion firm/sponsor desires any County services,
they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for
County services will be borne by the event promotion
firm/sponsor. -
The CITY Police Department shall act as liaison with various
downtown merchants in an effort to mitigate any disruption duri:.g
the Tournament.
The City shall allow access to Tournament site for set-up
to irty-sii (36) hours prior to Tournament.
The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the
Strand for Tournament staff parkiriz.
The CITY shall allow event promotion firm/sponsor the opportunity
to sell official pro volleyball concession items per certain
conditions.
No food c- beverage concessions snail be permitted.
THE CITY OF HE RMCSA BEACH RETAINS __._ RICHT TO AMEND, ADD OR
DELETE ANY CONDITIONS) OF SAID PC ..ICY.
MIS7ELLA1iEOUS EVENT PROMOTIOfi FIR!! 'SPO? SOR RESPONSIBILITIES
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide as many portable
DCA:-a-ionns as determined necessary by City staff.
Event promotion firm /sponsor shall designate area for spectators
to snore alcoholic beverages.
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall be responsible for all prize
money, volleyball equipment, sound system and personnel necessary
for conducting such a tournament.
Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach
Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Dept. of Community •
Resources.
City Council Approved
11/14/89
- 4-
s
i_�'ir•e �...Tti�_•yL '�. � t__ }icy... -t: r. *�-: s".r ;i_s �i' ...w -f. - .1�•'w a 3.,. ry'•• ,._fi"•1_`:�.._'5�.. : � a.— .��P°"�' dl: .... *.s.. ..- ,_•
May 26 and 27
June 9
July 7-8
August 4-5
SPECIAL EVENTS
SUMMER OF 1990
(As of 1/2/90)
1
Men's A (Calif. Beach
Volleyball Association
Tournament)
Men's Master (Calif.
Beach Volleyball Assoc.
Tournament)
Women's AA (Calif. Beach
Volleyball Association
Tournament)
International Surf
Festival
December 26, 1989
Honorable Mayor and City Council Meeting
Members of the City Council of January 9, 1990
FINAL DISPOSITION OF SEAVIEW PROPERTY
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council confirm depositing of the
final proceeds of sale of the Seaview property into the 4% WT
Railroad right-of-way acquisition fund, and authorize disburse-
ment from those funds of $3,949 to Coast Mortgage and Realty
Investors.
Background
The City's December 21, 1987 settlement of a law suit over the
Seaview Property at Gould Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway re-
quired the sale of the property by auction and a sharing of the
proceeds by the litigants. Section 8 of the settlement agreement
requires that the City distribute a share of the rents the City
collected during the period of litigation.
Analysis
Despite a host of disputes andlegal maneuvers, the City Attorney
and staff have been able to obtain the final close out of all
sellers' funds held in escrow from this sale. A check in the
amount of $15,223.58 was received as the City's final share of
the proceeds.
While another party has previously received their share of the
rents the City collected during the litigation for use of the
property for pumpkin and tree sales, Coast Mortgage and Realty
Investors has not to date received their portion of the rents
collected. Accordingly, it is appropriate and necessary to send
them their pro -rated share, which is $3,949.
Also, following prior Council direction for initially distributed
proceeds from the sale, it is appropriate to place the final pro-
ceeds in the 4% WT Right -of -Way Acquisition Fund.
For your information, the City's gross revenues from this sale
minus the rents owed, was approximately $400,000. These proceeds
helped enable the City to fund purchase of the "clear title"
Right -of -Way portion on December 21, 1989.
Kevin B. Northc.aft
City Manager
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
1i
December 6, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 9, 1989
COMMUNITY CENTER FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
CIP 89-615
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Authorize staff to approve additional labor by the present
owner of the existing fire alarm system to bring the
wiring up to standards acceptable to the Fire Department,
at a cost not -to -exceed, $2,500. ($1,950 plus contingency)
2. Authorize staff to purchase fire equipment such as audible
bells, heat sensors and digital fire control communicators
as required by the fire department, ata cost
not -to -exceed, $4,600.
3. Reject all bids received at the June 27, 1989 meeting.
4. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary, within the
budget limitations.
Background:
The existing fire alarm system at the Community Center needs to be
upgraded. Public buildings such as the Center, should be
adequately protected to safeguard both the public's financial
investment and the public's safety. The Fire Department
recommended that this project be initiated due to deficiencies that
they were aware of with the existing system.
On February 14, 1989, the City Council approved plans and
specifications for this project. Staff was authorized to advertise
for bids. Only one bid in the amount of $ 42,381 was received and
the City Council rejected that bid as too high.
The project was re -advertised and three bids in the amounts of
$ 32,519, $ 42,381 and $ 46,150 were received on April 6, 1989. At
the June 27, 1989 meeting of the City Council, the project was
returned to the staff with the request that the costs be reduced.
All of the above proposed work required the total removal of the
existing system and replacement with an all new system. The bids
were not formally rejected and therefore, City Council action will
be required to reject these bids if the City Council decides to
upgrade the existing system.
During discussions with the owner of the present fire alarm system
and the Fire Department, it was proposed that the existing system
be retained and upgraded to meet the minimum requirements of the
Fire Department. On September 5, 1989, a proposal was submitted to
the City with this intent for review.
Analysis:
This analysis is divided into the following sections:
1. The existing system
2. Why is an upgraded system needed?
3. Required changes to the existing system.
1. The Existing System
The existing fire alarm system is divided into two major areas.
The first area is the Community Center Theater which is protected
by, up to current Code, pressurized automatic sprinklers. The
sprinklers are located throughout the ceilings of both the public
area and the stage area. Each of the sprinklers is pre-set to turn
on at 135 degrees fahrenheit. However at this time there is no way
for the Fire Department to tell when one or more of the sprinkler
heads activates.
The second major area is the remainder of the Community Center
complex. This part of the fire alarm system is composed of
approximately 75 heat sensors throughout the existing rooms and
hallways, including the gym. This portion of the fire alarm system
is owned by Sentinel Signal Systems and is presently leased to the
City for $100 per month. Because new partitions have been-- -
constructed in some of the rooms, not all of -the new spaces now
have a sensor within that space. The existing sensors are
rate -of -rise temperature sensors and are over twenty years old.
The existing sensors are all wired into an automatic dialer which
transmits a signal to the owner of the present alarm system. He
then must call the dispatch center for Fire Department response.
2. Why is an Upgraded System Needed?
An upgraded fire alarm system is needed to properly protect the
public. In the Community Center Theater, the fire protection
requirement is fulfilled by the automatic sprinklers. However, it
is important that the Fire Department be notified at the time any
sprinkler goes off.
In the remainder of the Community Center complex, the Fire
Department needs to know when a fire has started and where. Each
separate space within the building should have it's own fire sensor
and at this time that is not the case.
The present method of transmitting a fire signal to the fire
department is not adequate. The system should be automatic and
notify the fire dispatcher the moment that a fire has been
sensed. This would reduce the time it takes for the Fire
Department to respond and improve their control over the fire.
- 2 -
3. Required Changes to the Existing System
There are only three (3) required changes in the Community Center
Theater area as follows:
1. The Fire Department is not presently notified when a
sprinkler activates (either fire or malfunction). This
needs to be corrected. A flow sensor valve needs to be
installed in the pipe that supplies water to the existing
sprinklers.
2. An audible fire bell needs to be installed on the outside
of the Theater building and wired to the flow sensor
valve.
3. The flow sensor valve also needs to be wired to the new
fire alarm communicator control panel at the Community
Center.
The required changes to the remainder of the Community Center
complex are as follows:
1. Install approximately 15 new heat sensors as required by
the Fire Department.
2. Install two or more audible fire bells as required by the
Fire Department.
3. Install a digital fire alarm communicator control panel
(Silent Knight, Model 5207 or equal) as required by the
Fire Department.
4. Install new wiring or improve old wiring layout to meet
the Fire Department requirements.
5. Revise existing wiring system to provide six or more fire
zones as required by the Fire Department.
6. All portions of the new fire system shall be available to
be tested by the Fire Department at their convenience and
to their standards.
The required changes to the existing system outside of the
Community Center are as follows:
1. Install a digital fire alarm communicator control panel
(Silent Knight, Model 9000 or equal) in the Hermosa Beach
Police Department dispatch center.
2. Connect the communicator control panel at the Community
Center to the control panel at the Police Department
through a direct "dedicated" phone line.
3. The fire alarm communicator system shall be tested by the
Fire Department to their standards and approval.
4. Sentinel Signal Systems will no longer be responsible for
monitoring the operation of the fire system.
Maintenance and Service Agreement:
Sentinel Signal Systems will still be responsible for the
maintenance and service of the on site system. The present lease
covering the existing on site wiring and sensors is proposed to
continue for the next three (3) years at the current rate of one
hundred dollars ($100) per month,
Fiscal Impact:
Budget
Estimated Proposed Expenditure
Estimated Tax Dollars Not Spent $ 42,888
Alternatives:
Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City
Council:
$ 49,988
$ 7,100
1. Accept the low bid of $32,519 and have staff return with a
contract for the Mayor to sign.
2. Reject the low bidder.
3. Re -bid the project.
4. Drop the project.
Respectfully Submitted,
ynn A. Terry P.E.
Deputy City Engineer
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Director of Finance
City Manager's Comment:
Concjux
(&-flitk.
Anthony Antich
Director of Pubuic Works
�Cevin B. North
Cit Manager
Steve Wisniewski
Public Safety Director
Following Council concerns about the large cost of this project for
the need it meets, the Engineering and Fire Divisions reviewed
cheaper options that might still meet current safety codes. The
result is a solution that is roughly $25,000 cheaper than a whole
new system, as first proposed. This reflects a significant
stretching of our tax dollars while not sacrificing our citizens
safety.
OEHLER.
SIGNAL SYSTEMS
2783 190th STREET
REDONDO BEACH, CA. 90278
(213) 371-0645
SUBJECT: Proposed Modification and Expansion of Automatic
Fire Alarm System in the Hermosa Beach Community Center.
I. Introduction.
Sentinel Signal Systems appreciates the opportunity to
present a proposal to the City of Hermosa Beach for
modification of the Fire Alarm System at the Community
Center.
1.0 Objective. Our objective is to expand and update the
existing Fire Alarm System to achieve better on-site
annunciation and monitoring at the most cost effective
price.
1.1 Scope. The scope of this proposal includes on-site
operation and function of the Hermosa Beach fire dispatch
operations.
II Modifications.
2.0 The original alarm system installed by Sentinel included _
fire detection sensors in every room and hallway in the
facility (approximately 75 sensors). Since that time
partitions have been added and some walls changed requiring
the relocation of some sensors and the addition of several
others.
2.1 Additional Sensors Required.
Room 5 Complex ---7 Detectors
Room 6/8 Complex--- 4 Detectors
Room 17 2 Detectors
2.2 Sensors Relocated/Repositioned
Room 11
Room 15
2.3 Alarm Control Panels.
New State Fire Marshall approved Control Panels; Silent
Knight Model 5107 shall be added. These are approved digital
communicators.
Option 1: Two (2) Panels
One in Main Office Storeroom.
One in Building D Storeroom.
Option 2: Three (3) Panels
One in Main Office Storeroom .
One in Building D Storeroom.
One Back Stage of Auditorium.
III Annunciation.
3.0 The following areas will be identified for annunciation
to the responsible Dispatch Authority:
SIGNAL SYSTEMS
2783 190th STREET
REDONDO BEACH, CA. 90278
(213) 371-0645
3.1 Building A --Auditorium
3.2 Building B --Ground Floor
3.3 Building B --First Floor
3.4 Building C--classrooms/Offices
3.5 Building D--Gymnasium/Kitchen
3.6 Building D --Ground Floor Maintenance/Offices
IV Monitoring.
4.0 The following options are offered:
4.1 Option One:
Sentinel will continue to monitor the Fire Alarm
System.
4.2 Option Two:
The System will be monitored by the Hermosa Beach
Dispatch Center.
V Audible alarms.
5.0 Audible alarm horns will be installed in the following
areas:
Building C/D Hallway
Building B --Ground Floor
VI Stipulations.
6.0 The following agreements shall be a part of this
contract:
6.1 The Contractor shall be furnished keys for access
into all areas for purposes of service and maintenance.
6.2 Facility power and phone lines will be provided by
the City.
6.3 Maintenance department will make available ladders
for purposes of installation and maintenance.
6.4 Contractor shall supply all maintenance and service
to the on-site Fire alarm System including parts and labor.
6.5 If Option One of paragraph 2.3 is adopted, the
Maintenance department will supply one two -conductor wire
from the Auditorium Sprinkler System Flow Valve•to Building
C.
6.6 If Option Two of paragraph 2.3 is adopted, a phone
line will be provided at the Auditorium Sprinkler System Flow
Valve.
6.7 If Option Two of paragraph 4.2 is adopted the
following steps will be necessary:
6.7.1 The City will purchase and own and have
installed a Digital Receiver in its Dispatch Center.
6.7.2 Said Receiver will be a Silent Knight Model 8520
or Equivalent able to receive signals from a Silent Knight
Communicator Model 5107.
6.7.3 Said receiver will have a "dedicated" phone line
for its operation.
6.8 Testing of the Fire alarm System will be conducted
by the Fire Department at their convience.
UiTfUiCft
SIGNAL SYSTEMS
2783 190th STREET
REDONDO BEACH, CA. 90278
(213) 371-0645
VII Costs.
7.0 The following Costs are offered:
7.1 Installation:
7.1.1 All Modifications of Paragraph II plus Option One
of Paragraph 2.3 ----Sixteen Hundred Dollars ($1600.00).
7.1.2 All Modifications of Paragraph II plus Option Two
of Paragraph 2.3 ----Nineteen Hundred -Fifty Dollars
($1950.00)
7.2 Lease, maintenance, and service of the System,
regardless of the Options of Paragraphs 4.1 or 4.2 will
continue for the next three years at the current rate, One
Hundred dollars (100.00) per month.
We hope that we will be able to continue to serve the City of
Hermosa Beach in the future as we have for almost twenty
years.
Sincerely,
William H. Farber
19TU[I[[L
SIGNALSYSTEMS
REDONDO BEACH. CA. 20278
0.13) 37141145
January 4, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 9, 1990
SUBJECT: OIL PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR),
TEXT AMENDMENT, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT (CUP) AND LEASE AGREEMENT
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL
PURPOSE: SCHEDULE FOR PROCESSING ABOVE NOTED DOCUMENTS
Recommendation
Adopt attached schedule.
Background
At the November 14, 1989 meeting, the City Council approved
staff's recommended process for completion of the above noted
documents, and requested that a public workshop hearing be
included.
Analysis
The staff has prepared a schedule which generally follows the
recommended process. However, it was slightly modified to
coincide with the first quarter General Plan amendments for 1990.
The schedule has been reviewed and found acceptable to the School
District and Macpherson Oil Company.
Attachments
1. Schedule
2. City Council Minutes of 11-14-89 meeting
CONCUR:
/, , /
7/%!%r`
Kevin B. Northc a
City Manager
P/ccsrsche
1
Respectfully submitted,
i
/Mich'ae'l— Schubach%
Planning Director
11
REVISED
December 18, 1989
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE FOR CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT (E.I.R.); ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND TEXT
AMENDMENT; AND APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) AND
LEASE AGREEMENT.
Between January 17 and February 5th -- Final Draft E.I.R made
available to public for minimum 30 day review ending March 6,
1990.
March 6th -- Planning Commission to consider certification of the
E.I.R and add any necessary conditions including noting further
analysis and public review if ultimately either of the two
alternative City Yard sites are chosen. Planning Commission
holds public hearing for General Plan amendment and text
amendment.
March 15th -- City Council and School District hold joint Public
Hearing workshop ith consultant; no public testimony at this
time.
April 10th -- CityandSchool District hold joint public hearing
to certify E.I.R; City Council holds public hearing on necessary
General Plan and text amendments.
Early April -- Start finalizing negotiations on final
arrangements with school district and Macpherson Oil, based on
E.I.R. information.
Late May -- Based on the final plan decisions and E.I.R.,
Planning Commission approves C.U.P.
Late June -- City Council approves lease agreement, and confirms
'C.U.P. approval by Planning Commission.
p/certeir
—2--
r
Sb.LUTION. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert
Backw od, dated November 5, 1989.
A st ff report was presented by Driector Ro•ert
Blackwood.
Addressin`q the Council on this matter was:
Michael Ha non - Attorney representing the H mosa Beach
Police Offi`ers Association.
Action: Continue
until the first mee ng in January.
Motion Rosenberl er, second Williams. Sq' ordered.
A recess was called at 8:55\P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 9. 0 P.M.
9. RECOMMENDATION FROM 'IHE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY
RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON NAMING THE GREENBELT.
Memorandum from Community Resources Director
Mastrian-Handman dated No ember 1, 1989.
1
A staff report was pres'- ted by Director Mastrian-
Handman. /
1
Proposed Action: To select th name of Hermosa Valley
Parkway for the former Railroad ght-of-Way.
Motion Sheldon, second Williams.
AYES: Sheldon, Williams
NOES: Rosenberger, Simpson, Mayor C eighton
/'
Action: To select the name of Hermosa Valley Greenbelt
for the former Railroad Right -of -Way.
Motion Simpson, second Rosenberger. So o dered, noting
the objection of Williams.
r
10. VACANCY /OF THE OFFICE OF CITY CLERK. Memorandum from
city Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated Novembe 8, 1989.
Supplemental information regarding City Cler salary
survey from Personnel Director Blackwood.
Action: To continue to the next meeting.
Motion Simpson, second Williams. So ordered.
Alana
11.
RECOMMENDATION FOR REVIEW OF PRECESSING OF OIL ENVIRON-
MENTAL IMPACE REPORT AND OTHER OIL RELATED PROPOSED
ACTIONS. - Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated November 7, 1989. Supplemental memo from
Michael Schubach dated November 14, 1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
Action: To approve staff recommendations as follows:
(1) To provide three (3) week public review and hold
final public hearing on only the EIR before the Planning
Commission as soon as staff can prepare reports and then
send to the City Council for a joint City Council/School
at,/
- 3 - Minutes 11-14-89
t
District/MacPherson 0i1 public hearing at the next
available City Council meeting.
(2) Hold General Plan amendment and text amendments at
a public hearing before the Planning Commission and then
at the next available City Council meeting.
(3) Based on final plan and EIR, approve CUP and lease
agreement at a publicly noticed date.
And an additional item: (4) To hold an additional Public
Hearing with MacPherson Oil Company, the Hermosa Beach
School District and the City.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
(a)
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
Recommendation on organization of General Services nd
Code Enforcement function. Memorandum from City Ma ager
Kevin B. Northcraft dated Octover 18, 1989. (CON•INUED
ROM 10/24/89 MEETING.)
Act%on: To approve staff recommendation re
organization study as follows:
rding re -
1) Retaq the General Services Directo and General
Servic Department.
2) Move all " rking Enforcement operations and person-
nel to Base\3. Consider a pe vent location for
these Personnel at the New Cit. Yard or perhaps a
new building on\Bard Street.
3) Consolidate datarocessin equipment city-wide in
basement - of City }fal1 t4 eliminate existing space
and hazard problems. T is should also increase the
functional coordination\of the General Services and
Public Safety data prg'esing systems.
rti
4) Expand Planning inti' a po of the space vacated
by Parking personnel in the bb'Ssement of City Hall,
if possible. /
5) Recruit a General Services Direct b with primary
emphasis on data processing skills an experience.
6) Change the General Services Officer itle to
Community Services Officers.
7) Increase the functional coordination of carie en-
forcement city-wide by holding joint trains g
meetings of code enforcement personnel from ll
d partments and develop systems, forms, and pro.-
edures that can be used by all departments.
C/4-
Minutes
/Minutes 11-14-89
January 2, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting
the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 9, 1990
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
The following claims have been submitted to the City Clerk's
office:
(1) The Vons Companies, Inc. 618 Michillinda Ave.
Arcadia, Ca. 91007-1734, filed January 2, 1990;
alleged failure to repeal Section 30-64 of
Ordinance 86-837 (utility users tax).
(2) The Vons Companies, Inc. (TCVI) 618 Michillinda
Ave., Arcadia, Ca. 91007-1734, filed January 2, 1990;
alleged failure to process refund for for 1988 utility
users tax.
Recommendation:
To deny claims and refer to the City Attorney.
Note: The above claims are available for review in the office of
the City Clerk.
Respectfully subrgitted,
-41,ifigaddwin'
Robert A. Blackwood
Risk Manager
CONCUR:
Kevin B. Nor t craft
City Manager
cc: City Attorney
January 4, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting
the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 9, 1990
RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM FILED JANUARY 3,
1990 BY BRIAN C. RUMBLE, FOR DAMAGE TO HIS VEHICLE, IN AN AMOUNT
NOT TO EXCEED $4,500
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize settlement of
the attached claim filed 1-3-90 in an amount not to exceed
$4,500.
BACKGROUND:
On December 13, 1989 Mr. Rumble's vehicle was damaged as a result
of an accident involving a City vehicle. The attached claim was
timely filed with the City Clerks office on January 3, 1990.
It has been determined that the City is liable for this damage.
ANALYSIS:
The City's liability claims administrator is obtaining an ap-
praisal of the damage to Mr. Rumble's vehicle. The estimate of
damage submitted with the claim is for the amount of $4,476 but
does not include thermoguard coating which may be required to
maintain the vehicle's warranty. The actual amount of repairs
may be less following the appraisers negotiations with the repair
shop.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert A. Blackwood
Risk Manager
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
in
January 2, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council January 9, 1990
SUBJECT: INTERIM ORDINANCE
LOCATION: R-1 ZONE, CITYWIDE
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL
PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE 17 -FOOT SETBACK
THE PROVISION OF 4 PARKING SPACES, AND TO WAIVE THE
17 -FOOT SETBACK FOR CERTAIN SMALL LOTS AND LOTS ON
NARROW ALLEYS
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached interim
ordinance.
Background
At their meeting of December 12, 1989, the City Council directed
staff to prepare an interim ordinance which would waive the
17 -foot setback requirement for garages, if four (4) parking
spaces are provided on site.
After discussing the issue with the Building Department and
considering the consequences on multi -family projects staff has
limited the 4 -parking stall exception to the R-1 zone and on
alley streets.
Staff has also included in the proposed interim ordinance a
provision for waiving the 17 -foot setback for those exceptionally
small lots of 70 -foot depth or less, and for the alley side of
lots with an 80 -foot depth or less where the alley is less than
15 -feet wide. In these cases the standard three (3) parking
spaces would be required.
The interim ordinance, if adopted, would be effective immediately
for a period of 45 days. The ordinance can then be extended for
a period of up to 22 months and 15 days after further notice and
public hearing. The Planning Commission will then take up the
issue of a permanent ordinance amendment at a later date in
conjunction with the Housing Element currently being prepared.
Analysis
The 17 -foot setback requirement for garages was established in
1986, for the purpose of providing enough room behind garages in
all zones to park a standard vehicle. By doing so, more parking
would become available, and cars would not block sidewalks. It
is apparent that the application of this requirement has been
quite successful in achieving these two objectives, especially in
the R-2 and R-3 zones. Nonetheless, the requirement has placed a
burden on certain R-1 property owners, mostly in the northern end
of the City, who have very small and shallow lots.
For example, those lots with a 70 foot depth after providing for
the setback, the required garage depth and the front or rear
setback, are left with a ground floor dimension of only 25-27
feet, and that in addition to open space requirements makes the
ground floor almost unusable. Also, it does not serve its
purpose for providing additional parking along those 80 -foot lots
facing alleys which are 15 feet and 10 feet in width as turning
radius is lacking. In both these cases the property owner, and
the City, would often be better off with three parking spaces,
one -stall deep, with direct access to the street or alley in
compliance with building setback and turning radius requirements.
Therefore, staff is recommending provisions in the interim
ordinance which would give an outright exemption to lots which
have a depth of no greater than 70 feet, and to the alley side of
lots of 80 -foot depth or less where the alley is 15 -feet or less
in width.
Also, the application of the 17 -foot setback on alleys is clearly
for the objective of providing additional parking. Therefore,
staff agrees with the Council that if those four (4) parking
spaces can be provided in another manner, the intent of the
original ordinance would still be served. However, in
consideration of the other objective of the original ordinance
regarding the blocking of sidewalks, staff is not comfortable
with the waiving of the 17 -foot setback along the street side of
R-1 lots, which would result in garage setbacks in the 5-17 foot
range which would inevitably result in cars blocking sidewalks.
Therefore, staff is recommending a provision that the 17 -foot
setback may be waived for the alley side of lots if four parking
spaces are provided:
Staff is not recommending that a waiver to the 17 -foot setback be
allowed in the R-2 or R-3 zone. Our records show that only one
variance from the requirement has been requested in the R-2 or
R-3 zone, and that was for an expansion to a non -conforming
2 -unit project which was subsequently denied, meaning that
developers are not having difficulty meeting the requirement, and
numerous projects have already been constructed in compliance
with the setback. Also, applying a waiver provision to
multi -family projects would be more difficult to interpret. To
qualify for a waiver would the unit facing the alley be the only
one required to provide the 4 parking spaces?, or would 4 spaces
need to be provided for each unit? Further, guest spaces in
multi -family projects are intended to be shared by all residents
of the project and to qualify for a waiver guest spaces might
have to be assigned particular units, taking away the advantage
of having this type of guest space. Also, since the height
limits are higher in the multi -family zones loss of usable ground
2
level open space can easily be compensated for on the upper
floors.
A
CONCUR: ,, .-,
//i :.fir//
Michael Schubach
Plan in: Directo
Kevin North
aft
City Manager
Attachments
1. Proposed Interim Ordinance
2. C.C. Minutes 12/12/89
1
,Ken Rofertson
Associate Planner
plandoc/pcsrl7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. 90 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM ORDINANCE TO EXEMPT CERTAIN PROJECTS FROM
THE 17 -FOOT GARAGE SETBACK REQUIREMENT IN THE R-1 ZONE
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January
9, 1990, and made the following Findings:
A. An alternative needs to be made available to the 17 -foot
garage setback for R-1 lots to recognize unusually small lots
and unusual circumstances, as long as adequate parking is
otherwise provided for in lieu of the 17 -foot setback area;
B. A reasonable period of study, to assess the reasonable
development of R-1 properties that because of the size,
shape, or location of the lot make the provision of the
17 -foot setback unnecessary, a burden on the property owner,
or force the construction of an unattractive structure
inconsistentwith the
surrounding
neighborhood
to protect the health safety and welfare of the
C. Section 65858 of the Government Code authorizes
is necessary
public;
the adoption
of an interim ordinance as an emergency measure which can act
to prevent conflicts with the contemplated proposal that the
City Council has directed the Planning commission to study;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby ordain the following:
SECTION 1. The 17 -foot setback requirement for garages facing a
street or alley, as required by Section 1157(C) of
the Zoning Ordinance, shall be waived for properties
located in the R-1 zone in the following situations:
a) On either the street or the alley side of a lot
when the depth of the lot, as measured in
accordance with the zoning ordinance, 'is no
greater than seventy (70) feet.
b) On thel alley side of a lot where the alley is
equal to or less than 15 -feet wide and the
depth of the lot is no greater than eighty (80)
feet.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
All other requirements pertaining to number of
required parking spaces, required turning radius,
parking stall dimensions, building setbacks, etc.,
contained in the zoning ordinance shall be complied
with.
SECTION 2. The 17 -foot setback requirement for garages facing
an alley, as required by Section 1157(C) of the
zoning ordinance, may be waived for any
single-family residential project located in the R-1
zone if a minimum of four (4) standard parking
spaces are provided in conformance with the
dimensional requirements contained in Article 11.5
of the zoning ordinance.
SECTION 3. This ordinance is effective for a period of
forty-five (45) days from today's date unless
extended pursuant to the provisions of California
Government Code Section 65858
SECTION 4. The staff shall draft a report for presentation to
the public at its first regular meeting in February,
1990. Such report shall state what steps are being
taken by ordinance and what steps are planned to be
taken in the future to remedy this situation
SECTION 5. Pursuant to government Code Section 36937, this
ordinance is designed to protect the health and
safety and welfare of the citizens of Hermosa Beach
and becomes effective immediately upon adoption by a
four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council.
SECTION 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after
the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause
this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a
weekly newspaper of general circulation published
and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the
manner provided by law.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in
the book of original ordinances of said city, shall
make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in
the records of the proceedings of the City Council
at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1990.
ATTEST:
p/ccordl7
PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR
OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
a]1/4 v' CITY ATTORNEY
B4CHORa1r/ID
414TER/41
Action: To adopt, Ordinance No. 89-1021.
Motion She on, second Creighton. So ordee e
3. ITEMS REMOVED FRO THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
Items (e) , (f) , (i) , a 1) -re discussed at this time
but are listed in rder for clari
4. WRITTEN CO UNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC - to
PUBLIC HEARINGS/
5. APPEAL OF DENIAL BY PLANNING COMMISSION OF VARIANCE
REQUEST TO 17' SETBACK AT 3133 THE STRAND. Christopher
& Janet Coppersmith, appellants. Memorandum from Plan-
ning Director Michael Schubach dated December 4, 1989.
Supplemental letter from Lawrence S. Gray, Jr., 2426 The
Strand, dated December 11, 1989. Two supplemental memos
from Planning Director Michael Schubach, dated December
11, 1989. Supplemental letter from Kenneth Snyder, 3001
The Strand, dated December 12, 1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
Addressing the Council on this item was:
Chris Coppersmith - 3133 The Strand - in favor
Brian O'Mally - 3330 The Strand - in favor
Joanne Bland - Resident of Hermosa Beach - in favor
Don Hovis - Architect, 1848 S. Elena, R.B. - in favor
Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place - opposed
Chris Coppersmith - rebuttal
Proposed Action: sTo approve the variance.
Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. Objection by Mid-
stokke, Sheldon, and Mayor Creighton. Motion fails.
Action - To direct staff to return to Council on January
9, 1990 with an interim ordinance, pursuant to Section
65858 of the State Planning and Zoning Law, which waives
the 17' setback on alleys, if parking space is provided
for four (4) vehicles.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered
Final Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5334, entitled,
"A RESOLUTION DENYING THE APPEAL OF, AND THEREBY
AFFIRMING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A VARIANCE
TO ALLOW AN ENCROACHMENT INTO THE REQUIRED 17' GARAGE
SETBACK AT 3133 THE STRAND, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 23,
BLOCK 1. SHAKESPEARE TRACT."
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
A recess was called at 9:00 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 9:15 P.M.
.RE: :r2, City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach
public hearing for JanuarY,9, 1990:
January 3, 1990
To Vlhom it may concern:
YE,S!!!..the seventeen foot setback should be waived
on alleys only. It should be kepted on streets as
with a 5 to 7 foot setback to garages people tend to
park over the sidewalks and block pedestrian traffic.
According to the "City of Hermosa Beach Department of
Building d: Safety General Residential Zoning Re-
quirements" (which I picked up on December 27th,
1939) under: "Off -Street Parking Requirements" it
clearly states: "Single Family -dwellings: Two: spaces
per unit plus one guest space'. V;here are you get-
ting the four parking Spaces bit??1:!...it is NOT in
the city requirements.
If you are going to do anything about increased
parking.. .how about increasing the requirements for
?Multiple Units" :?...which is presently given "the
gift" of only 2i spaces per unit. No wonder condo
projects are popping up like weeds in this city!:
Summary:
1) Viaive 17 foot setback on alleys.
2) heep the 17 foot setback on streets.
3) keep the 3 parking spaces for single-family.
4) Increase Multiple Units to be consistent with both
Single-family and Duplex parking requirements.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Ron Felsing
249 -27th Street
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
JA.N 0 r7 171 ga
•
Ron Felsing
249 27th Street
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
December 28, 1989
Dear City Manager:
1 saw this article in the BEACH MWS. Yesterday I went down to
the city and got the City of Hermosa Beach Department of Build-
ing ,ek Safety General Residental Requirements" . ,Under the heading
of 'Off -Street Parking Requirements' it states ''Single iami17—
dwellings : Two spaces per unit plus one guest spot-. Hence that
would be a total of THREE, spaces, i\OT FOUR as Councilmember Chuck
:Sheldon thinks. You might want to point that out to his attention.
1 see the logic of the 17 foot set -back on a street ----with a 5 to
7 foot set -back to garages ---someone might park there and then
block the sidewalk to pedestrians. I don't see the logic of it on
alleys as there are NO sidewalks on our alleys.
I di.d notice under 'Taff -Street Parking Requirements" for Multiple
Units: `Two spaces per unit plus one guest space for each two units''.
He'ce that equals spaces per unit and then Councilmember Sheldon
wants to penalize single-family dwellings with four parking spots.
What's the difference between a family with three drivers in a condo
and a family with three drivers in a single-family dwelling? The
family in the condo is given a Rift of parking requirements and by
requiring four spots in a single --family, the single-family is put at a
serious disadvantage.
The 17 foot. set --back should be repelled, parking requirements for
single-family be kepted at the three spaces, and the parking require-
ments be increased. for condo projects.
Pleaoe see to it that my letter is given to each councilr.;ember, to
each planning commission member, and the appropriate City Staffs.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
•a9 -Y\
P.:�.
RX: PUBL,.IC NOTICEZ in EASY READER. 1 wrote to the Planning
Commission in care of the Planning Department numerious times when
1 saw a public hearing on a conditional use permit and vesting
tentative parcel map on many condo projects '.which I stated it should
only be allowed if they had two spaces per unit plus one guest spot
per unit. When watching the meetings on cable I never heard any of my
letters ever mentioned.
•
^12•
• Beach, News-- Thursdare December::14,`, 1989, ,
Council Also Denies Computer Purchase
Hermosa Beach City Council
Appoints Clerk; Denies Variance
by Bruce Houser
Twenty three year Hermosa Beach
resident Elaine Doerfling was ap-
pointed City Clerk by the City Council
at Tuesday night's meeting. The Coun-
dl appointed Doerfling after interview-
ing five candidates who applied for the
two year position. Currently self-
employed as a minute -taker, Doerfling
has 14 years of government experience,
and has served as Deputy City Clerk for
the City of Manhattan Beach. Doerfling
will fill the two year appointed position
which became vacant when Clerk Kath-
leen Midstokke was elected to the City
Council.
Computer Purchase Voted Down
The City Council voted to receive
and file consent item E recommending
the purchase of MacIntosh computer
systems for the Fire, Police and Civil
Service departments. Councilmember
Robert Essertier, who pulled the con-
sent item, felt that the computer pur-
chase should be denied until the City
has an "overall computer plan," which
would allow for departmental inter-
linking of city-wide computers. Public
Safety Director Steve Wisniewski said
that computer benefits would include
an increase in the quality of service, and
a decrease in staff time. Wisniewski also
stated that the Fire Department could
input a list of hazardous materials
found in area businesses into the com-
puter, which could be accessed from the
field. Currently, the Fire Department
has to look up this information manual-
ly at the Station.
Despite Wisniewski's comments,'
Councilmember Chuck Sheldon agreed
with Essertier. "Instead of spending
$37,000 to $38,000 on computers," Shel-
don said "it's time the Council created
a detailed computer plan. The Council
then held a roll call' vote where a
majority denied the computer pur-
chase.
17 Foot Setback Variance Appeal
Denied
After a long and controversial public
hearing, the City Council concurred
with the Planning Commission's
recommendations and denied a garage
setback variance at 3133 Strand. The
denial requires that the property
owners, Chris and Janet Coppersmith,
provide the 17 foot garage setback
called for in the R-1 zoning code. The
Coppersmiths, who have plans to build
a 3,870 square foot residence, had ap-
plied for a variance to the code asking
for only a nine foot garage setback. This
variance was denied by the Planning
Commission.
Hermosa Beach Planning Director
Michael Schubach said that City Staff
denied the variance for several reasons,
- primarily because similar lots have the
17 foot setback. Schubach said that the
Coppersmiths would only lose 192
square feet of living space with the 17
foot setback. _
Variance appellant Chris Cop-
persmith addressed the Council saying
that none of the other 47 houses on the
block have the 17 foot setback. Cop-
persmith went on to say that his neigh-
bors enjoy houses up to three feet from
the property line, and that the 17 foot
setback would decrease living space by
400 square feet. Hermosa Beach resi-
dent Brian O'Mally, who had received
a 17 foot setback variance at his proper-
ty next to Coppersmith's, thought the
Planning Commission's denial of
Coppersmith's variance was unfair.
"The setback discourages families from
moving into the area," O'Mally said.
Councilmember Robert Essertier ques-
tioned the variance denial asking "who
are we protecting, no other houses -in
the area have the setback?"__
Councilmember Chuck Sheldon said
"the 17 foot setback was fundamentally
ms i u etc to provide for four off-street,
parking spaces." Coppersmith would
provide for three parking spaces if the
17 foot variance was granted. Sheldon
felt that the City needed to review the
17 foot setback due to the great amount
of building variances being filed, and
motioned to direct City Staff to review
the setback ordinance requiring it, to
provide either the 17 foot setback or
four parking spaces, off-street: With
this suggestion, a roll call vote, was—
taken
as_'taken and the variance appeal was' -4
denied, amended to include Sheldon's,
suggested revisions..
-9
4
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council j
FROM: Michael Schubach, Plan Di•ector
SUBJECT: Interim Ordinance Regarding the 17 -foot Garage
Setback
DATE: January 9, 1990
Attached is the proposed Interim Ordinance with a recommended
modification to allow an exception for narrow alleys of 15 -feet
width or less for lots of 85 feet deep or less rather than the
originally proposed 80 feet. The reason for the modification is
because in the Shakespeare Tract where the condition of the
narrow. lots exist staff noticed that there are blocks which
contain lots of 80.5, 82.5, and 85 foot depths, in addition to
the more common 80 -foot depths. In the interest of fairness,
staff believes that all the narrow alley situations in the Tract
should be allowed the exception from the 17 -foot setback.
Also attached is a diagram of the result of the exception on
these narrow lots. Staff's believes the second option of the
waived 17 -foot setback is preferable because it results in the
provision of the required turning radius for all three vehicles,
does not encourage the parking of up to two vehicles with only a
15 -foot turn -around, and allows the owner the option of building
more square footage on the ground floor.
SUPPLEMENTAL'
INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. 90 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM ORDINANCE TO EXEMPT CERTAIN PROJECTS FROM
THE 17 -FOOT GARAGE SETBACK REQUIREMENT IN THE R-1 ZONE
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January
9, 1990, and made the following Findings:
A. An alternative needs to be made available to the 17 -foot
garage setback for R-1 lots to recognize unusually small lots
and unusual circumstances, as long as adequate parking is
otherwise provided for in lieu of the 17 -foot setback area;
B. A reasonable period of study, to assess the reasonable
development of R-1 properties that because of the size,
shape, or location of the lot make the provision of the
17 -foot setback unnecessary, a burden on the property owner,
or force the construction of an unattractive structure
inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood is necessary
to protect the health safety and welfare of the public;
C. Section 65858 of the Government Code authorizes the adoption
of an interim ordinance as an emergency measure which can act
to prevent conflicts with the contemplated proposal that the
City Council has directed the Planning commission to study;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby ordain the following:
SECTION 1. The 17 -foot setback requirement for garages facing a
street or alley, as required by Section 1157(C) of
the Zoning Ordinance, shall be waived for properties
located in the R-1 zone in the following situations:
a) On either the street or the alley side of a lot
when the depth of the lot, as measured in
accordance with the zoning ordinance, is no
greater than seventy (70) feet.
b) On the alley side of a lot where the alley is
equal to or less than 15 -feet wide and the
depth of the lot is no greater than eighty-five
(85) feet.
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
All other requirements pertaining to number of
required parking spaces, required turning radius,
parking stall dimensions, building setbacks, etc.,
contained in the zoning ordinance shall be complied
SECTION 2. The 17 -foot setback requirement for garages facing
an alley, as required by Section 1157(C) of the
zoning ordinance, may be waived for any
single-family residential project located in the R-1
zone if a minimum of four (4) standard parking
spaces are provided in conformance with the
dimensional requirements contained in Article 11.5
of the zoning ordinance.
SECTION 3. This ordinance is effective for a period of
forty-five (45) days from today's date unless
extended pursuant to the provisions of California
Government Code Section 65858
SECTION 4. The staff shall draft a report for presentation to
the public at its first regular meeting in February,
1990. Such report shall state what steps are being
taken by ordinance and what steps are planned to be
taken in the future to remedy this situation
SECTION 5. Pursuant to government Code Section 36937, this
ordinance' is designed to protect the health and
safety and welfare of the citizens of Hermosa Beach
and becomes effective immediately upon adoption by a
four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council.
SECTION 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after
the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause
this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a
weekly newspaper of general circulation published
and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the
manner provided by law.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in
the book of original ordinances of said city, shall
make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in
the records of the proceedings of the City Council
at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1990.
PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND -MAYOR
OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
p/ccordl7
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
2
80 -FOOT LOT ON
NARROW ALLEY
•1•1111.
INN .11••••=ND
i4LI I
15' -
-Tv 44 it4c7r
E7—.19 I
35'
•••• ....1••••••!
17 -FOOT SETBACK
1
1
.11•11. 4•11. •Mai
>
44'
Bo'
QM.
ST IZ EE -T
J
WAIVED 17 -FOOT SETBACK
"
Jef,..A.. Win te,...:,,,...i.....0...S.....4....14,4i.N.Sie/466.104,4644e04.,...441,0104,.....•.9,11044....4.•••640S0,........' •
Honorable Mayor Members of the
Hermosa Beach City Council
SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 89-5
January 2, 1990
Regular Meeting of
January 9, 1990
PURPOSE: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD GYMNASIUM/
HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST
FOR THE C-2 ZONE, TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR SAID USE, AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING STANDARDS.
INITIATED BY THE_PLANNING COMMISSION
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the zoning ordinance text be amended to
include Gymnasiums and Health and Fitness Centers as permitted
uses in the C-2 zone with a Conditional Use Permit, and that a
standard of 1 parking space per 50 square feet of floor area used
for exercise, fitness, or dance classes and 1 space per 100
square feet of floor area used for gymnasium type weight lifting
and weight training activities.
Background
At their meeting of September 19, 1989, the Planning Commission
recommended that the City Council approve the text amendment with
a parking standard of 1 space per 50 square feet of total floor
area.
The City Council, at their meeting of October 24, 1989, expressed
concern that the proposed parking requirement was too
restrictive, and directed staff to reconsider the parking
requirement and to reschedule this item for Planning Commission.
There appeared to be general consensus, led by Councilmember
Creighton, that 1 space per 100 or 125 square feet of floor area
would be more appropriate for weight lifting and weight training
facilities.
At their meeting of December 5, 1989, the Planning Commission
recommended an amendment with a parking standard of 1 space per
50 square feet of floor area for exercise/fitness classes, and 1
space per 100 square feet for gymnasium type facilities which are
used for weight lifting and weight training activities.
Analysis
Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report
1
dated December 5, 1989, for analysis of the subject text
amendment.
CONCUR:
' .ter
Michael Schubach
Planning Director
evin Northcraft
City Manager
Attachments
1. Proposed Ordinance
2. P.C. Resolution 89-90
3. P.C. Staff Report 12/5/89
4. City Council Action Minutes 10/24/89
t/pcsrgym
2
h Rob4.u.„
ertson
Associate Planner
ORDINANCE 90-100,M
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE TO ADD GYMNASIUM/HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER AS A
PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2, RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL ZONE, WITH A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING STANDARDS FOR
SAID USE AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE
DECLARATION.
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 9,
1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding a text
amendment to allow gymnasium/health and fitness center as
permitted use in the C-2 zone, and to establish parking standards
for said use and made the following findings:
A. Gymnasiums and health and fitness centers are not any more
intrusive than other uses allowed in the C-2, Restricted
Commercial Zone;
B. Because of the parking demand, the variety of the types of
gymnasiums/health and fitness centers, and its possible
impact on the character of C-2 zoned areas, a conditional use
permit to establish this type of use should be required;
C. By requiring parking at a ratio of 1 space per 50 square feet
of gross floor area used for facilities with fitness/exercise
classes, and 1 space per 100 square feet for gymnasiums with
weight lifting and weight training facilities, and requiring
the review necessary of a Conditional Use Permit will
mitigate any potential impacts associated with the parking
demand or the intensity of a gymnasium/health and fitness
center;
D. The location of a gymnasium/health and fitness center in the
C-2 zone is appropriate for C-2 areas within the City and
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
would be compatible with surrounding commercial and
residential uses;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance text be amended as
follows:
SECTION 1. Amend Section 8-3. C-2 Restricted Commercial zone by
adding to the permitted use list in alphabetical
order:
"Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Center; Conditional
Use permit required subject to Article 10"
SECTION 2. Amend Section 8-4. C-3 General Commercial zone by
eliminating the following from the permitted use
list:
"Gymnasium; Health center, physical fitness"
SECTION 3. Amend Section 1152. Off-street parking, commercial,
and business uses, by adding under (E) Commercial
uses:
"11. Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Center: 1 space
for each 50 square feet of gross floor area for
facilities offering exercise, fitness, or aerobic
dance classes, or 1 space for each 100 square feet
of gross floor area for gymnasium type weight
lifting and weight training activities"
SECTION 4. Amend ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS, by adding the
following:
"Sec. 283. Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Center.
A facility, whether open to the public or a
private club, which provides the indoor space,
equipment, and the supervision/training/teaching for
physical activities including, but not limited to,
sporting activities, exercising, martial arts,
aerobic dancing, weight training, gymnastics, and
spas."
SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full
force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of
its final passage and adoption.
SECTION 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after
the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause
this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a
weekly newspaper of general circulation published and
circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the
manner provided by law.
et,Oto. ..s-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in
the book of original ordinances of said city, and
shall make minutes of the passage and adoption
thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City
Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 9th day of
January, 1990.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR
of the City of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
S
B4CKORa(ND.
.?/ITER/41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION P.C. 89-90
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION P.C. 89-71, AND RECOMMENDING
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD GYMNASIUM/HEALTH AND FITNESS
CENTER AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2, RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL ZONE,
AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING STANDARDS FOR SAID USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL
NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on
September 19, 1989, and recommended that the City Council adopt
the subject text amendment by adopting Resolution P.C. 89-71,
and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at their December. 5, 1989
meeting, modified their recommendation regarding the parking
requirement, and made the following findings:
A. Gymnasiums and health and fitness centers are not any more
intrusive than other uses allowed in the C-2, Restricted
Commercial Zone;
B. Because of the parking demand, the variety of the types of
gymnasiums/health and fitness centers, and its possible
impact on the character of C-2 zoned areas, a conditional use
permit to establish this type of use should be required;
C. By requiring parking at a ratio of 1 space per 50 square feet
of gross floor area used for exercise classes, and 1 space
per 100 square feet of remaining floor area, and requiring
the review necessary of a Conditional Use Permit will
mitigate any potential impacts associated with the parking
demand or the intensity of a gymnasium/health and fitness
center;
D. The location of a gymnasium/health and fitness center in the
C-2 zone is appropriate for C-2 areas within the City and
•
. Y:'�tnn.:x:k..._..:,:.;:+n-�..r...r�..a.i.i�.s�.r.FwFi V4:�-�k.s Y.ei.":w,CH i.�4..:..•.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
-8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
would be compatible with surrounding commercial and
residential uses;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission
of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby modify
Resolution P.C. 89-71, and recommend that the zoning ordinance
text be amended as follows:
1. Amend Section 8-3. C-2 Restricted Commercial zone by adding
to the permitted use list in alphabetical order:
"Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Center; Conditional Use permit
required subject to Article 10"
2. Amend Section 8-4. C-3 General Commercial zone by eliminating
the following from the permitted use list:
"Gymnasium; Health center, physical fitness"
3. Amend Section 1152. Off-street parking, commercial, and
business uses, by adding under (E) Commercial uses:
"11. Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Center: 1 space for each
50 square feet of gross floor area for facilities offering
exercise, fitness, or aerobic dance classes, or 1 space for
each 100 square feet of gross floor area for gymnasium type
weight lifting and weight training activities"
4. Amend ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS, by adding the following:
"Sec. 283. Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Center.
A facility, whether open to the public or a private
club, which provides the indoor space, equipment, and the
supervision/training/teaching for physical activities
including, but not limited to, sporting activities,
exercising, martial arts, aerobic dancing, weight training,
gymnastics, and spas."
VOTE: AYES: Comms.Ingell,Ketz,Moore,Peirce,Chmn.Rue
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 89-90 is a
true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning
Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their
regular iieeting of December 5, 1989. ,-, /--- - / ''.->" ; '�
Rue, Chairman MYchael Schubach, Secretary
a/persgym
November 27, 1989
Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach Planning Commission December 5, 1989
SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 89-5
PURPOSE: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD GYMNASIUM/
HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST
FOR THE C-2 ZONE AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING STANDARDS
FOR SAID USE.
INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the zoning ordinance text be amended to
include Gymnasiums and Health and Fitness Centers as permitted
uses in the C-2 zone with a Conditional Use Permit, and that a
standard of 1 parking space per 50 square feet of floor area used
for exercise, fitness, or dance classes and 1 space per 100
square feet of floor area not used for classes be established.
Background
At their meeting of September 19, 1989, the Planning Commission
recommended that the City Council approve the text amendment with
a parking standard of 1 space per 50 square feet of total floor
area.
The City Council, at their meeting of October 24, 1989, expressed
concern that the proposed parking requirement was too
restrictive, and directed staff to reconsider the parking
requirement and to reschedule this item for Planning Commission.
The City Council believed that 1 space per 100 square feet of
floor area would be more appropriate.
Analysis
Staff's original recommendation of 1 parking space per 50 square
feet of floor area was based on comparisons of surrounding city's
parking requirements, and was chosen to cover the worst-case
scenario of a Gymnasium or Health and Fitness Club which offer
exercise classes. This type of use obviously generates a very
high level of parking demand, and the parking standard would be
consistent with that required for a "public assembly" use.
When making its original recommendation staff recognized that
other types of gymnasiums, athletic clubs, or health clubs might
not require such a high level of parking demand, but felt that
the Parking Plan provisions would be the best way to deal with a
proposal for less parking. With the Parking Plan the Planning
Commission would have the ability to consider proposals on a
-8 -
12
case-by-case basis and to establish conditions appropriate for
that particular case.
A parking standard of 1 space per 100 square feet for areas not
used for exercise classes is perhaps more realistic, and would
make it clear that the city's parking policy towards traditional
gymnasiums is less restrictive than its parking policy towards
health clubs which include large exercise classes. Also,, the
opportunity to provide less parking would still be available
through the Parking Plan process.
Further background and analysis of the subject text amendment is
contained in the attached reports.
Michael Schubach
Planning Director
Ken Ro`1Sertson
Associate Planner
Attachments
1. Proposed Resolution
2. P.C. Resolution 89-71
3. City Council Action Minutes 10/24/89
4. P.C. Staff Report and Minutes 9/19/89
5. P.C. Minutes 7/5/89 and 4/4/89
7. Correspondence
t/pcsrgym
damage, and police problems. (Requestedy Mayor
Williams and Councilmember Sheldon.) CONTINUED FROM 10/
10/89 MTG.
MOTION R W STAFF TO RESEARCH HOURLY COS FROM PRIVATE INDI-
VIDUAL OR PERSON WHO WOULD BE ABLE GIVE MORE THAN 2 HOURS PER
MO. ON THIS.
JW WOULD LIKE JUi NOTIFIED WILL BE)25 SECOND NOV. MTG.
SO ORDERED.
BRING BACK ON 11/28.
MOTION JW/CS TO R & F IT 1M. SO ORDERED.
(b)
Letter from Dr. Pete Willman, Mayor of Weil am Rhein in
Germany, dated'August 1, 1989, thanking the City for
making his visit to Hermosa Beach so pleasant. (Re-
quested by4Iayor Williams CONTINUED FROM 10/10/89
MTG.
MOTION JW/CS TO R & F. SO ORDERED.
Letter from Dawn Bailey, 17316 Amie ve., Torrance,
,thanking the Police Department for th rP rofessional
'treatment and kindness in assisting her ith an article
for her school newspaper. (Requested by CQuncilmember
Sheldon.)
c: = �/npoir'erf iLo f.5":; ��p ►^espo4s /S con, �pig
MOTION CS/RC TO R & F. SO ORDERED.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.
(c)
PROPOSED TEXT! AMENDMENT TO ADD GYMNASIUM/HEALTH AND FIT-
NESS CENTER TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST IN THE C-2 ZONE
AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING STANDARDS FOR SAID USE, WITH
ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning
Director Michael Schubach dated October 16, 1989.
SHANE MCCOLGAN, 1157 7TH ST. - PULSE FITNESS CENTER -
DR. KAUFMAN, 901 HERMOSA AVE. - REP. SO. BAY KUNG FU CLUB.
WILMA BURT, 1152 7TH ST.
JR - WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE LENIENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
JW - INCLINED TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS WITH LESS RESTRICTIVE PARKING.
JW - SHOULD INCLUDE YEARLY REVIEW.
RC - CHANGE FROM 1 SPACE FOR 50 TO 1 SPACE FOR 100 OR 125.
MOTION RC/JR TO SEND BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO REVIEW
SUGGESTED CHANGES TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND THEN READVERTISE
HEARING. SO ORDERED.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
ROPOS'PROGRAM FOR CLEANING OF DOWNTOWN SIDEWALKS.
Mem dum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich
d e ptember 20, 1989. CONTINUED FROM 10/10/89 MTG.
/0
CLtrZi C.02
ft -V /19
January 2, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council January 9, 1990
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-13 (A MASTER
CUP FOR VASEK POLAK USED CARS, BMW, SUBARU, AND
VOLKSWAGON AUTO DEALERSHIPS) GRANTED BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION ON 12/5/89
LOCATION: 2775, 2851, 2901, AND 3001 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
REQUESTED BY COUNCILMEMBERS MIDSTOKKE AND WIEMANS
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council affirm the Planning
Commission's decision to grant a Master Conditional Use Permit
for the contiguous properties currently under control of Vasek
Polak, as conditioned.
Background
At the December 5, 1989 meeting, after hearing substantial input
from the applicant and the public, the Planning Commission
approved Vasek Polak's request, with modifications, for a
conditional use permit to authorize the operation of auto
dealerships on the subject contiguous properties. The conditions
were discussed in detail, and several were modified as a result
of the: testimony. The final set ofconditions incorporate all
conditions of previous conditional use permits, and the existing
development agreement, where currently applicable.
The December 5 hearing was the third time that the Planning
Commission heard testimony on this application, previously
continuing the matter on October 17, and November 21, 1989. (The
minutes for the October 17 are attached, however, due to an
illness to the Minutes Secretary the November 21, and December 5,
1989 minutes are not available at this time, but may be provided
as supplemental material on either January 8th or 9th.)
Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff reports
dated December 5, 1989, and November 21, 1989, for further
background and project history.
Analysis
The Planning Commission and staff have spent considerable time
working on this request, and in staff's judgement, have come up
with a reasonable solution to the various problems in a way which
fairly and logically balances the concerns of the City, the
nearby residents, and the applicant. Through the implementation
and enforcement of the Master C.U.P. the City will permit the
auto dealerships to continue their operations, but in a manner
1
which will reduce impacts on the nearby residents. These
conditions will be actively enforced by staff in accordance with
the law, and citations will be issued if the conditions are
violated, which will result in financial penalties applied for
each day of the violation. Also if no effort is made to correct
the violations the Planning Commission may revoke the C.U.P. at
any time.
Staff realizes that all the problems may not be immediately
resolved, and that all those involved may not be satisfied, but
is confident that this Master C.U.P. is the first step towards a
long-term solution.
Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff reports
for further analysis.
Michael Schubach
Planning Director
„„
even Northraft
en Robertson
Associate Planner
City Manager
Attachments
1. Proposed Resolution
2. Appeal Request
3. Site Map
4. P.C. Resolution 89-76
5 P.C. Staff Reports, 12/5/89 and 10/17/89
6. Memos from Bldg. Director 12/5/89 and 10/17/89
7. P.C. Minutes, 10/17/89
8. Photographs
9. Correspondence
10. Public Notice affidavit
a/pcsr2851
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
While a great many conflicts between the dealerships and neighboring
residents have been resolved, new problems come up and old ones recur.
The master C.U.P., together with C.U.P. enforcement staffing and
written enforcement policy and procedures, give us greatly improved
tools to abate these problems.
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA AFFIRMING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO GRANT A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTOMOBILE AGENCIES, INCLUDING STORAGE
AND SALES OF PARTS AT 2775, 2851, 2901, AND 3001 PACIFIC COAST
HIGHWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS NORTH 500 FEET OF LOT A, TRACT 1594
PLUS LOTS 124 THROUGH 127 INCLUSIVE, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
CONVENTION HALL AND MARINE VIEW PARK TRACT.
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 9,
1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an appeal
of the Planning Commission's decision to grant a conditional use
permit for automobile agencies at 2775, 2851, 2901, and 3001
Pacific Coast Highway and made the following findings:
A. The applicant is proposing to expand his current auto
dealerships;
B. Parts storage and sales operations are shared throughout the
site with at least two automobile related business and
parking is shared throughout the entire site;
C. The existing dealership's current Conditional Use Permits are
out of date and not adequate to deal with the expanding
nature of these businesses, and are not .coordinated to
recognize the connection between these contiguous properties,
and therefore a master Conditional Use Permit was necessary
to cover the entire combination of operations;
D. The proposed use is consistent with the Hermosa Beach General
Plan and imposition of conditions as required by Planning
Commission Resolution 89-76 shall mitigate any impacts on
nearby commercial and residential properties;
res
-3-
'R
•`SNAF!•.r.az tak,wl
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
E. The Planning Commission and staff have worked with the nearby
residents, and the applicant towards making a final decision
on this request, has balanced the interests of both parties,
and made an appropriate decision in granting the conditional
use permit;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach,
California does hereby affirm the Planning Commission's decision
to grant a Master Conditional Use Permit for auto dealerships and
associate parts storage and sales at 2775, 2851, 2901, and 3001
Pacific Coast Highway, subject to the conditions of Planning
Commission Resolution 89-76
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED, this 9th day of January, 1990
PRESIDENT, of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
a/ccrs2851
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
.s.... n,...v...«.`A-QX.e'•y.,.t. x., a,' _:..li°E MH.+...ac..mt., ...ii3..s..3
City of2-lermosa 1r3. each
i '•
.y.
4
City of Hermosa Beach
Office of the City Clerk
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885
December 13, 1989
'JET 2 x1989
Pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2-2.27, we,
being two current members of the City Council, wish to call up
for Council review on an appeal basis the following decision of
the Planning Commission:
Master C.U.P. with modifications for Vasek Polak BMW
d S baru dealerships at 2851 Pacific Coast Highway.
Subaru S4 -7k . *4t,
Said conditional use permit was approved at the Planning Commis-
sion meeting held on December.,5, 1989.
Kathleen Midstokke, Councilmember Alberiemans, Councilmen er
ld
/?5
2 `°
/2s 85
3
3E
S
) 2 8
-J
¢s
MARLIT
70 70 411 is
0 � ,2_. •, 115°'
20 ° 21
70
70 73.68
/3492
0 10370°
Mr) 19
4L
b
18
Mf 99 /
8.0/0:° •
//8
V -T
g96
M`0
ti
b
17
/3/ 89
07,6`10s°
16
/e2.73
zo
obs 3 p„y1!
/80.05
/60
/40
1
.410
- "
o. 55 s
51r tac,
i 20
A . _
Z07040s•% - Por
15
///.96
6,550s°
&
c„ 14
eN
1-
0
0
Q
a.
.90
90
0
Jr
KEATS
ST.
TENNYSON
ST.
(1)
4 O
U p3D`
84CHORaiND
Al4 TER/41
RESOLUTION P.C. 89-76
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
AUTOMOBILE AGENCIES, INCLUDING STORAGE AND SALES OF PARTS, AND
ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 2775, 2851, 2901, AND 3001
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS NORTH 500 FEET OF LOT
A, TRACT 1594 PLUS LOTS 124 THROUGH 127 INCLUSIVE, SOUTHERN
,CALIFORNIA CONVENTION HALL AND MARINE VIEW PARK TRACT.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on
October 17, November 21, and December 5, 1989 to receive oral and
written testimony regarding an application for an amendment to a
Conditional Use Permit at 2901, and an application for a
Conditional Use Permit at 2851 Pacific Coast Highway and made
the following findings:
A. The applicant is proposing to expand his current auto
dealerships;
B. The parts storage and sales operation shares its storage
with at least two automobile related business and parking is
shared throughout the entire site;
C. The existing dealership's current Conditional Use Permits are
out of date and not adequate to deal with the expanding
nature of these businesses, and are not coordinated to
recognize the connection between these contiguous properties,
and therefore a master Conditional Use Permit is necessary to
cover the entire combination of operations;
D. The proposed use is consistent with the Hermosa Beach General
Plan and imposition of conditions shall mitigate any impacts
on nearby commercial and residential properties;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of
the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a
Master Conditional Use Permit for auto dealerships and associate
parts storage and sales at 2775, 2851, 2901, and 3001 Pacific
Coast Highway, subject to the following conditions:
',...;M"i.C+t4+411"a.+6.'616"M"wiSL1.1wp�1lE1441.e.�1�.�/Yl�a!'.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
' 11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1. The location of structures and features on the property shall
be in substantial conformance with submitted plans as revised
and approved by the Planning Commission, in accordance with
the conditions below; any modification shall be submitted to
the Planning Director for approval.
2. The applicant shall conform to all the sections of the
Development Agreement, DA 85-1,
3. The public right-of-way shall not be used for the parking or
storing of vehicles that are intended for sale, repair, or
service.
4. Test driving of vehicles on local residential streets shall
be prohibited.
Repair, service, maintenance, and testing of alarms on
vehicles must be conducted within the buildings, and all
outdoor repair work activities shall be prohibited. The
__washing of vehicles outside is permissable, however., the use
of non -biodegradable soaps and solvents is prohibited.
6. Storage of trucks, tractors, trailers, and RVs in the parking
and car display areas or any other location on the premises
shall be prohibited.
7. There shall be a minimum of 93 on-site parking spaces,
including 35 spaces in the service bays, provided for
employees and customers. The parking spaces shall be
properly striped and designated with employee or customer
parking signs. Customer parking shall be evenly distributed
throughout the site for access to the different businesses
and dealerships to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
8 Use of customer/employee designated parking spaces for
displaying auto merchandise shall be prohibited, except on
the identified parking stalls located east of the front gate
at 2901 Pacific Coast Highway (BMW dealership) during
weekends when service areas are clhsed. / r�
9 Adequate on-site parking spaces/1must be provided for the
employees. Using residential streets and Pacific Coast
Highway for parking employee automobiles is prohibited.
10. There shall be a sign posted in the new car sales offices,
and repair buildings directing the customers and mechanics to
the route, approved by the Planning Director, which may be
used for test driving. Additionally, the following shall be
provided:
(a) A pole sign, and a sign painted on the pavement
restricting vehicles to Right -turn only out of the exit
from 2901 P.C.H. to 30th Street.
(b) Tow -away signs on the front of the vertical door on 30th
Street, when closed, and on the chains guarding the
front entrances off Pacific Coast Highway, when the
access is closed.
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The car stackers shall be placed on the locations designated
on the approved site plan. A detailed survey shall be
submitted to accurately show the dimensions of the car
stackers, and to verify that they can be placed at the
proposed location without encroaching into the required
8 -foot setback on the west or into the required 20 -foot wide
fire lane on the east. If the dimensional requirements
cannot be met the car stackers may be located atanother
location on the site is subject, to approval of the Planning
Director.
The fire lane shall be/'identified by a painted sign on the
elivery o vehicles or parts - - u is ig t -o
shall be prohibitd.
. .
14.Permitted operation hours for car sales is 8:00 a.m. to 9:00
p.m.. Auto repair activities may take place from 7:00 a.m.
to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and except for Thursdays to 7:30
P.M. - •. _ _ -.:.: _ a t rr :n=srrPest
cieetr ^421---w-i w 1 -Q=om. There shall be no car repair
on Saturdays or days.`
Noise emanating from the property shall be within the
limitations prescribed by the City's noise ordinance, Article
19.5 of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, and shall not create a
nuisance to the surrounding residential neighborhood and
commercial establishments. Creating loud or obnoxious noise
shall be prohibited. If there is a noise violation, a sound
proof wall shall be constructed along the westerly property
line.
16. There shall be no outdoor bells, buzzers or outside paging
system.
17. The exterior of the premises including the parking areas
shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times.
18. All exterior lights shall be located and oriented in a manner
to prohibit glare to the neighboring residential property and
public right-of-way.
19. All sloping unimproved areas along the westerly property line
shall be landscaped in a manner to eliminate erosion; size,
type, and quantity of landscaping to be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Director.
20. Prior to the Conditional Use Permit being in effect, the
applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, a signed
and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form.
21. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the deed,
and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning
Department.
22. The Planning Commission may review the Conditional Use Permit
and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new
_conditions i''f deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental
effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use.
-q-
.-. r_ .4 .v;..sifw'ivnt trI b..P
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
23 The applicant shall submit three (3) copies of a revised site
plan for review and approval by the Planning Commission, by
February, 1990 which clearly indicates the following:
a. The sub -sections of the operation area, indicating all the
different dealerships and business.
b. The location and dimensions of entrances and exits to and
from the site, and the circulation and stacking areas for
cars waiting for service, as shown on the previously
approved site plan for 2901 Pacific Coast Highway, dated
October 6, 1988.
c. The proposed striping of parking areas and identification
of customer and employee parking.
d. All the Buildings and structures, including the location
of service bays, doors, driveways, landscaped areas, and
fencing.
-24. This Resolution supersedes Resolution 154-19, 154-706, and
154-762.
Revised plans shall submitted for review and approval by the
Planning Commission at their February../.6!. 1990 regular
meeting. v1/5
26. An employee who is aware of conditions of the Conditional Use
Permit shall be on the premises during business hours.
(a) All managers, and employees, including parts sales and
service personnel, and car salesman, shall be given a
copy .of the conditional use permit and shall acknowledge
by signature that the conditional use permit has been
read and understood.
27. Disposal of all waste material shall be in conformance with
local, state, and federal laws, and under no circumstances
shall be disposed of in storm drains.
VOTE: AYES: Chmn.Rue,Comms.Moore,Ketz,Ingell
NOES: Comm.Peirce
ABSTAIN: none
ABSENT: none
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 89-76 is a true
and complete record of the action taken by the Planning
Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their
regulareeting of December 5, 1989. .--) Ai;?
/',/f . ✓ :/-,-?Z 77_�
y Rue, Chairman Michael'Schubach, Secretary
90
Dat
/0
a/pers2851
33
November 29, 1989
Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach Planning Commission December 5, 1989
(CONTINUED FROM THE OCTOBER 17 AND NOVEMBER 21 MEETINGS)
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 89-13 (A MASTER
CUP FOR VASEK POLAK USED CARS, BMW, SUBARU, AND
VOLKSWAGON)
REVOCATION OF EXISTING C.U.P. FOR BMW DEALERSHIP
(RESOLUTIONS P.C. 154-706 & 154-762)
VARIANCE TO ALLOW CAR STACKERS TO ENCROACH INTO THE
SETBACK REQUIREMENT
LOCATION: 2775, 2851, 2901, AND 3001 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
APPLICANT: VASEK POLAK
P.O. BOX 8002
REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277
PURPOSE/
REQUEST:
1. CONSIDER REVOCATION OF CURRENT C.U.P. FOR BMW
DEALERSHIP AS A RESULT OF CONTINUOUS VIOLATION
AND COMPLAINTS (DIRECTED BY CITY COUNCIL)
2. CONSIDER AMENDING THE CURRENT C.U.P. TO ALLOW
CAR STACKERS, TO AUTHORIZE THE USE OF THE
BUILDING AND LOT AT 2851 P.C.H. (PREVIOUSLY
BORRELLI'S RESTAURANT) AS AN AUTO AGENCY/PARTS
SUPPLY BUILDING, AND TO CONSIDER A MASTER
C.U.P. TO ENCOMPASS THE VASEK POLAK USED CAR,
BMW, SUBARU, AND VOLKSWAGON DEALERSHIPS
Recommendation
Staff continues to recommend that the Planning Commission approve
this request only as a Master Conditional Use Permit to encompass
all the contiguous properties currently under control of Vasek
Polak, subject to the conditions in the attached resolution.
Background
At the November 21, 1989, meeting the Planning Commission
continued this item at the request of the applicant, and directed
staff to pursue enforcement of the violations. Since that time
the Subaru operation at 2775 P.C.H. has been replaced by a
Volkswagon dealership, and the Subaru dealership has moved to the
property at 2851 P.C.H. previously identified as a auto parts
supply, and employee parking. This has occurred without any
notification to the City, and as such staff is pursuing
enforcement immediately.
The variance request has become unnecessary as the car stackers
can be located without encroachment into the 8 -foot setback, and
that request has therefore been withdrawn.
The applicant has brought in plans which depict the BMW new and
used dealerships, purposely excluding the remaining property
currently being used for Subaru and Volkswagon dealerships, as he
would like to have those considered separately. From staff's
perspective, however, it is clear these operations are
interrelated, as evidenced by the shuffling of the dealerships,
and by the fact that parts storage and service vehicles are
shared amongst the three locations. (See attached photos)
Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report
dated October 17, 1989 for further background and project
history. (A note of correction -- the previous staff report
under project history identified P.C. 154-19 as a C.U.P. for the
dealership at 2775 P.C.H., while the 1956 document, in fact, is
only a resolution interpreting parking requirements for this
site)
Analysis
Staff strongly believes that the fairest and most logical way to
deal with this application from both the perspective of the
applicant and the City is through a Master C.U.P. for all the
auto related uses on these contiguous properties.
As far as the applicant is concerned this would give him
flexibility to use the property for auto sales, repair, parts
storage and sales, and respond to market changes to perhaps
re -allocate storage and parking space to different businesses as
needed, as long as adequate parking is provided and certain
conditions are followed. Ironically, this would also allow the
applicant to legalize the use of 2851 P.C.H. for a Subaru
dealership whether it be temporary or permanent. Also, this
would allow the applicant to maintain a centralized parts
distribution and storage warehouse containing parts and
.accessories for all makes of vehicles. If the dealerships
operate under separate C.U.P.'s the parts storage would have to
occur on the same site as the particular dealership.
From the City's perspective, the C.U.P. conditions would be the
same for all operations on the entire site, making them easier to
understand and enforce. Also, it would be easier to enforce
conditions on the entire property, rather than to try to find out
which business is at fault should violations arise or to enforce
3 or 4 different C.U.P's with different parking, display, and
storage arrangements.
To this end, the applicant needs to submit plans which depict the
entire subject property, and which provide the required number of
customer/employee parking spaces for the 93,000 square feet of
"auto agency." The 93 spaces would be identified specifically
for customer or employee use only, and could not be used for
display of new vehicles. The spaces would have to be evenly
distributed throughout the site. This has been partially
accomplished with the revised plans submitted for BMW and the
used car dealership, as noted below, although these are still not
complete.
BMW AND USED CAR DEALERSHIPS
The applicant has submitted new plans which depict the BMW
dealership (2901 P.C.H.) and the used car dealership at 3001
P.C.H. and ties these two sites together. According to the plans
26 of the proposed 32 car stackers can be located along the
westerly property line without requiring a variance and without
encroaching into the 20 -foot wide fire lane, although this needs
to be verified with a more detailed information and a survey
depicting dimensions of the stackers and the distance from the
property line and the building. Also, 8 existing car stackers
will be relocated to 2901 P.C.H. from 3001 P.C.H.
The plan also shows additional available parking spaces, although
some are substandard in regards to turning radius because of some
fencing and outdoor storage and work areas not shown. The total
parking spaces that can be counted towards meeting the parking
requirement for customers and employees, according to the plan,
and as calculated by staff are as follows:
Service Bays 24
Open 36
Under Stackers 26
Total 86
Of course, this would only be the case if none of these stalls
were used for the storage of new cars, which is perhaps
unrealistic given the current number of new vehicles being stored
on-site. Revised plans should realistically depict the number of
these spaces which must be striped and clearly identified for
customer or employee use only.
The plan also shows and acceptable way for interior circulation
of vehicles waiting for service, which is currently not the way
it is done on the property.
In sum, the plans are acceptable as conceptual plans, however,
some details need to be resolved with staff. Additionally, staff
has recommended conditions for striping the stalls, for clearly
identifying stalls for customer or employee use, and for
identifying that the access drive in the rear is a fire lane.
Please refer to the staff report of 11/17/89 for further
analysis.
CONCUR: /% /
/rte : /--------___
Mfchae1 Schubach
Planning Director
Attachments
1. P.C. Resolution 89-80
2. P.C. Staff Report 10/17/89
3. Photographs
-13-
Ken Robe — son
Associate Planner
a/pcsr2851
October 9, 1989
Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach Planning Commission October 17, 1989
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-13 (A MASTER CUP FOR
OPERATION OF SUBARU, BMW, AND PARTS STORAGE),
VARIANCE 89-10
REVOCATION OF P.C. 154-706 & 154-762
LOCATION: 3009 & 2851 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY,
APPLICANT: VASEK POLAK
P.O. BOX 8002
REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277
PURPOSE/
REQUEST:
1. CONSIDER REVOCATION OF CURRENT C.U.P. FOR BMW
DEALERSHIP AS A RESULT OF CONTINUOUS
COMPLAINTS (DIRECTED BY CITY COUNCIL)
2. TO ALLOW AN ADDITIONAL PARTS STORAGE AND
RETAIL SALE FOR PORSCHE, AUDI, BMW, SAAB,
SUBARU PARTS, AND A VARIANCE TO ALLOW
ENCROACHMENT INTO THE REQUIRED 8 -FOOT SETBACK
ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONE
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use
Permit 89-13, subject to the conditions in the attached
resolution, and deny Variance 89-10.
Background
Project Summary
Zoning:
General Plan Designation:
Lot Operation Area:
Present Use:
Parking Provided:
Environmental Designation:
C-3
General Commercial (GC)
-3( 3� f�kximat-e-Iy-)
Auto Sales & Parts Storage
44 Spaces
Categorically Exempt
The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of
September 21, 1989, recommended a negative declaration for
the conditional use permit. The Committee, at their meeting
of October 5, 1989, also recommended a negative declaration
for the Variance request.
Project History
On October 8, 1956, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution P.C. 154-19 approving an auto
dealership at 2775 Pacific Coast Highway (Subaru Agency
Property).
On March, 17, 1969, the Planning Commission approved a
conditional use permit and adopted Resolution P.C. 154-706
for operation of a new and used car sale business at 2901
Pacific Coast Highway (BMW Agency Property).
On December 15, 1969, the Planning Commission approved a
conditional use permit and adopted Resolution P.C. 154-762
for operation of a used car sales at 3009 Pacific Coast
Highway (BMW Used Car Sales Parcel).
On March 11,1986, the Planning Commission approved the
Development Agreement DA 85-1 between Vasek Polak and the
City of Hermosa Beach for the vocation of the Alley to the
rear of the BMW Car Dealership.
Revocation of Existing Conditional Use Permits
There are two Conditional Use Permits approved for the operation
of the BMW agency. Since 1969, the City has received many
complaints regarding the issues addressed in the report provided
by the Building Department (attached) and some of those issues
are not conditioned in the conditional use permits. However, the
expansion of the dealerships into the adjacent property and the
proposed master C.U.P. should resolve the past problems which
were for the most part the result of inadequate space for the
operation.
Conditional Use Permit Master CUP 89-13
The applicant is requesting retail sale and storage of auto parts
in an existing building, previously used as a restaurant, located
between the Subaru and BMW properties. Since the request is
related to operation of BMW and Subaru, it has been determined
that the request should be reviewed in conjunction with the
operation of both Subaru and BMW Dealership.
The Zoning Ordinance specifies 1 parking space for
square feet of the site area. The combined site area
used car lot, Subaru dealership, and the proposed
storage and sales is approximately 92,500 square feet
therefore require 93 parking spaces.
each 1,000
for the BMW
auto parts
which would
Although it is not absolutely clear on the plans, staff has
calculated that following number of parking spaces are provided
on the subject sites:
BMW dealership: 42 (24 service bays)
Subaru dealership: 20 (11 service bays)
Parts Storage Lot: 17
Total 79
Staff has included all parking areas and service bays in this
calculation, but has excluded all areas which are for the purpose
of car storage or display.
Even with the additional property obtained for parts storage the
parking is not adequate (14 spaces short). This is because of the
replacement of parking stalls on the rear of the BMW site with
the proposed car stackers (which staff considers merchandise
storage and display), and because of inefficient use of the
parking area adjacent to the parts storage building (this area
could be re -striped more efficiently to park up to 29 cars).
As such, staff is recommending as a condition that the plans be
revised to accurately depict all parking spaces, and that the
parking area on the storage site be re -striped to maximize
parking.
The plans do not adequately show how customer service is provided
for repair service on the BMW site. The plans approved pursuant
to the development agreement show customer receiving lines for
cars,lwaiting for service from an attendant located in the rear
aisle. The new plans have this access closed off. The plans
should be revised to provide access and stacking areas through
the site in order to avoid cars stacking onto P.C.H..
In sum, staff does not have any objections to the use of 2851
P.C.H. in conjunction with the car dealerships since it provides
both space for storage/sales and additional parking. However the
plans need to be revised to accurately depict and account for
required parking by re -striping the parking area at 2851 P.C.H.
to maximize parking, and to show how customers will access the
site for attendant service.
Variance
The applicant has also requested a variance to encroach into the
8 -foot setback required for Commercial Projects which abut
residentially zoned properties. The original purpose of this
request was to move 8 car holders currently located across 30th.
Street at P.C.H. to a better location. This request now proposes
locating 32 of these structures at the rear of the BMW
dealership. The 2 -level holders (which measure 8'-6" wide, 15'
deep, and 11'-4" high) would intrude into the setback requirement
from single family residential properties zoned R-1, and would
replace some of the existing parking
Section 8.5-1(9) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code describes
the setback requirements for commercial buildings adjacent to
residential zones as follows:
"A minimum rear and/or side yard setback of eight (8) feet shall
be provided, and an additional two (2) feet of setback shall be
provided for each story over the first story for structures that
abut residential zones, except where public rights-of-way, twenty
(20) feet or greater in width, separate commercial zone from
residential zone."
Based upon the staff's review, the following findings justify
denial of Variance 89-11:
1. An extraordinary situation or exceptional circumstance
applicable to this property is not experienced by the
applicant if application of zoning regulation [8.5-1(9)] is
strictly imposed on the subject property. The elimination of
the need to park new vehicles on sidewalks and residential
streets, stated in the applicant's letter, may take place but
the need to encroach into the setback is not proven
necessary.
2. The needs for off-site parking spaces will not exist when the
,applicant provides adequate on-site parking spaces in
compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. Also, as noted above,
additional parking area is available at the parts storage
site, a possible alternative location for the car holders
which would not require a variance.
3. The placement of the car holders along the portion of the
rear with a 5 -foot separation between the property line and
the retaining wall would result in an encroachment into the
required 20 -foot wide fire lane (pursuant to the development
agreement) at their rear, which is a safety hazard.
4. Since these structures are mechanical, there is a potential
noise impact on the adjacent residents.
5. In order to move the existing 8 car holders, which would need
a 70 foot wide area, the applicant has other locations
available on the_. site. Therefore, there is no absolute
necessity proven by the applicant to encroach into the 8 -foot
setback from the residential area.
6. The proposed encroachment would be incompatible with the
future neighboring setbacks, and could have an adverse impact.
on the neighborhood and has the potential to be detrimental
to surrounding properties.
7
Alternative
Staff believes that the car stackers would be more appropriately
placed on the proposed site for expansion (Borrelli's), although
the total proposed of 32 car stackers may be an excessive number
if customer and employee parking can not be adequately provided.
If this alternative is acceptable to the applicant, the new
location for the car holders could be shown on the revised site
plan for the Conditional Use Permit and approved as part of the
C.U.P.
Michael Schubach
Planning Director
Attachments
1. P.C. Resolution 89-76
2. "'P.C. Resolution 89-80
3. Resolution No. P.C. 154-19
4. Resolution No. P.C. 154-706
5. Resolution No. P.C. 154-762
6. Building Department Report
7. Site Map
8. Photographs
9. Applicant's Letter of Support
10.' Staff Review Minutes of September 21, 1989
11. Application
12. Public Notice Affidavit
/01(
Pahl 'Soud i
Assistant Planner
a/pcsr2851
—Pc? —
Honorable Chairman and
Members of the Planning Commission
December 4, 1989
Planning Commission Meeting
December 5, 1989
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RE: VASEK POLAK OPERATIONS
On November 29, 1989, staff became aware that the Vasek Polak
Subaru dealership had been relocated from 2775 P.C.H. to 2851
P.C.H. (former Borelli's site).
Mr. Polak had submitted a C.U.P. amendment request (continued to
this meeting at the applicants request) to use the site for parts
storage as part of his existing dealerships; however their had
been no previous indication of any intent to relocate the Subaru
dealership to that location.
In accordance with the Planning Commission direction provided at
the November 21, 1989 meeting, a citation was issued to Mr. Polak
for operating an automobile dealership without the requisite
conditional use permit and for installation of signs without a
permit.
Since the date of the last meeting, a renewed complaint was
received regarding an employee car parking on Thirtieth Street
and continued test driving of vehicles on Thirtieth Street by BMW
salesman. These complaints were once again brought to Mr. Polak's
attention by letter on November 30, 1989 (hand delivered). These
items are not citable as they are violations of the development
agreement and not zoning or conditional use permit violations.
As previously indicated to the commission, staff is recommending
significant revisions to the conditions of operation which will
allow for future citations for violating conditions of the C.U.P.
Respectfully submitted,
&teire', .
William Grove
Director of Bldg. & Safety
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORP.M IQPi
Honorable Chairman and
Members of the Planning Commission
October 12, 1989
Planning Commission Meeting
October 17, 1989
HEARING TO CONSIDER REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE
VASEK POLAK BMW AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP AT
2901 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission:
1) Incorporate appropriate conditions from the existing
conditional use permit and development agreement in a new
conditional use permit to include the expanded area.
2) Direct staff to monitor the establishment for compliance with
conditions.
3) Set a review hearing for six months from this meeting.
BACKGROUND
As a result of continuing complaints regarding the operation of
the BMW Automobile Dealership by a neighborhood association
calling itself "Citizens Concern Group 30th Street", the city
council, on August 8, 1989, directed that a hearing be scheduled
before the Planning Commission to consider revocation of the
conditional use permit.
During the past year, staff has attempted to resolve concerns
raised by the referenced association. Some concerns appear to
have been resolved; however others remain.
ANALYSIS
In addition to the letter dated July 14, 1989 submitted to the
city council, the group spokesman, Michael Pitton, submitted a
list of outstanding complaints to City Manager Kevin B.
Northcraft on September 6, 1989. The printed, unedited,
reproduction of the handwritten list is included in the
background material.
There are three (3) documents which place conditions on the
operation of the BMW Automobile dealership. They are as follows:
1) P.C.154-706 - Granting a conditional use permit for the
operation of new and used car sales business at 2901 Pacific
Coast Highway. Adopted March 17, 1969.
2) P.C.154-762 - Granting a conditional use permit for the
operation of a used car lot at 3009 Pacific Coast Highway.
Adopted December 15, 1969.
3) Development Agreement recorded as Document No. 86-976928 with
the Los Angeles County Recorder. Adopted April 15, 1986.
- 26 -
1
The conditions of the development agreement are not enforceable
by action of the Planning Commission; however complaints relative
1//////4
to those conditions will be addressed here as staff is
recommending that those conditions be included in a new
conditional use permit to cover the entire area of BMW operation.
Referring to the list of complaints submitted by Michael Pitton,
spokesman for "Citizens Concern Group 30th Street":
1) Parking for employees and customers -
The development agreement and background material for
P.C.154-706 indicate that employee and customer parking is to
be provided on the strip of •land west of the former alley.
The improvements in this area were only recently completed;
however the area has been used for customer parking and new
car storage.
Employee parking on Thirtieth Street was a previous complaint
that was addressed by the dealership by instructing the
employees to park elsewhere. It is unknown where the
employees are parking; however they are not parking on site
with the possible exception of those driving "demo" cars.
Employees also do not appear to be parking on Thirtieth
Street, La Carlita or other Hermosa Beach residential
streets.
Hermosa Beach zoning regulations require parking spaces to be
provided based on floor area or lot area ratios. The
regulations do not require employees of this or any other use
to park on site. The parking spaces should be available for
customer or employee parking which would mean no storage of
new or used cars for sale in that area. A revised condition
should clarify the parking issue.
2) Two level car carriers -
In an effort to provide additional storage area for vehicles
for sale, the dealership installed two level car carriers
along the westerly property line of the used car lot.
The car carriers meet the zoning code definition of structure
and therefor, pursuant to Section 8-5.(9), must be setback
from the property line which abuts residential property a
distance of eight (8) feet.
The dealership is proposing to relocate the two level car
carriers to the main dealership site; however a variance is
still needed as proposed (see variance request section).
3) Unloading of equipment and deliveries on Thirtieth Street -
Neither conditional use permit addresses the issue of
deliveries of any kind; however Section 9(g) of the
development agreement states that the dealership is "to make
provisions for transport truck deliveries on-site and
_2 _
off-site, the prohibition of deliveries occurring on 30th
Street, and attempt to make deliveries at the Saab Dealership
in Manhattan Beach."
Transport truck deliveries are not occurring on 30th Street;
however some other deliveries may occur there. It is staffs
opinion that the condition refers to "transport truck
deliveries" due to the problem of street blockage.
Deliveries by small vehicles, legally parked, should pose no
problem; however they could be accommodated on site. A
revised condition should clarify the delivery issue.
4) Development Agreement Fees Not Paid -
A $1500.00 fee was paid to process the development agreement
by Vasek Polak Enterprises as evidenced by receipt #4094
dated February 28, 1986.
5) Loud Paging System - _
Both iconditional use permit resolutions prohibit "loud or
obnoxious noise" and the C.U.P. for the used car facility
also prohibits "outside speakers or amplified telephone
bells".
The development agreement indicates the dealership is "to
make provisions for minimizing any noise including but not
limited to outdoor loud speakers, bells, buzzers, and similar
noise."
The dealership did utilize outside loud speakers for paging
salesman, etc. in the past. A site inspection revealed that
the loudspeakers have been removed and paging was only barely
audible if standing close to the building since all
.loudspeakers are now inside the structure.
For future compliance, staff would recommend a condition that
references the noise standards contained in Chapter 19.5
H.B.M.C. to alleviate any ambiguity as to what constitutes a
"loud or obnoxious noise".
6
Alarm demonstrations -
See section under Loud Paging System for noise restrictions.
Since car alarms are part of the product the dealership
sells, it would seem unreasonable to totally ban any alarm
demonstrations. _Alarm demonstrations could be limited to
reasonable hours (i.e. between 9 am and 6 pm) to minimize
disturbances to adjacent residents. Staff has not observed
any car alarm demonstrations so the frequency and duration of
demonstrations is unknown.
7) Test driving on residential streets -
- 2Z-
The conditional use permits are silent regarding test
driving. The development agreement indicates the dealership
is "to not road test any vehicles on local residential
streets within the City of Hermosa Beach. Residential
streets are those defined in the Circulation Element to the
General Plan of the City".
Road testing has not been observed by staff during several
inspections of the site; however it has been a consistent and
recurring complaint of area residents. The city has provided
the dealership with a reproducable map indicating acceptable
test routes (arterials and collectors). The dealership is to
inform mechanics and potential buyers of acceptable routes on
which to test cars.
In an effort to reinforce the condition it is recommended
that signs be posted in both the sales area and repair area
indicating the allowable routes for road testing vehicles.
8) Vacation of Alleys -
In conjunction with the development agreement adopted in 1986
the city council ordered the vacation of a portion of the
alley paralleling Pacific Coast Highway and bisecting
property owned by the dealership. The vacation was
accomplished in conformance with state and local laws.
9) Business hours -
The conditional use permit for the used car lot indicates
"hours of operation from 8:00 am to 9:00 pm". The
conditional use permit for the new car sales facility
indicates "hours of operation for service of customers cars
shall not exceed 8:00 am to 6:00 pm weekdays, 8:00 am to
5:00 pm on Saturdays, and no repair on Sundays". The
development agreement indicates the dealership is "to limit
all auto repair activities to between the hours of 7:00 am
and 9:00 pm on week days and 8:00 am and 1:00 pm on
Saturdays; no auto repair activities on Sunday and no auto
repairs may be done after hours unless all doors and windows
are closed".
Section 11 of the development agreement provides that any
rule or regulation in conflict with the provisions of the
agreement are repealed or modified to conform to the
provisions of the agreement. The conditional use permit
should therefore be modified to conform to the hours of
operation limitation contained in the development agreement.
The establishment's advertised hours of operation for the
service department are 7:30 am to 5 pm Monday, Tuesday,
Wednesday and Friday and 7:30 am to 7:30 pm on Thursdays. No
violation of the hours of operation were observed by staff.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS OF CONCERN
_ Z3 _
Other issues which have been raised in addition to those
indicated in the list include:
1) The unauthorized expansion onto the former Borellis
restaurant site for parts warehouse purposes.
The appropriate amendment has been requested by the
dealership and is to be considered by the Planning Commission
concurrently with this matter.
2) Lights from the dealership fall on residential property.
The complaint involves the new car facility whose conditional
use permit does not address the issue. It is recommended
that an appropriate condition be included in a new
conditional use permit to require shielding of security,
lighting so that light does not fall directly on residential
property.
SUMMARY
Staff does not feel that the current manner in which the
dealership is operating warrants the drastic action of revoking
the conditional use permit.
A new conditional use permit should be approved which omits
unnecessary conditions, incorporates all applicable conditions in
a single document and clarifies the requirements.
Respectfully submitted,
/% 2
Com'(„_ // /i
William Grove
Director of Bldg. & Safety
Wilma Burt, 1152 7th Street, Hermosa Beach, stated that this building has been vacapt
for long time. She noted, however, that to call this building a "remodel" is a misno• er,
because the building was actually rebuilt using only a small portion of the . -vious
structure: She stated that this is a nice -looking building and she agreed that t building
needs to be tented.
Public Hearing clbsedd at 7:43 P.M. by Comm. Ingell.
Comm. Peirce stated that he could support this request so long as -the applicant complies
with the requirements. i'1 agreed that this building is not a/"remodel," and he stated
that that loophole should be Zlpsed in the code.
Comm. Ketz stated that this will a good use of the property, since it will encourage
very little traffic during the day and here will be a Limited amount in the evening.
Comm. Ingell felt that the daytime provis i -seem to be far too restrictive; however, if
the applicant agrees, he would also agree.i 1fe�commented on the evening schedule and
asked whether the applicant would agree -to have.a fifteen -minute break between classes
so that the cars would have time to leave and new cis could arrive and park.
Mr. Kundaew had no opposition to having a break betwee? ?asses.
MOTION by Comm. Ketz, seconded by Comm. Peir e, to approve staff's
recommendation, Resolution P.C. 89-77, with the addition of acndition requiring that
there be a fifteen -minute break between classes in the evening.
AYES: Comms. Ingell, Ketz, Peirce
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Comms. Moo -e, Rue
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR ADDITIONAL PARTS STORAGE FOR VASEK POLAK BMW AND
SUBARU DEALERSHIPS AT 2851 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
VARIANCE FOR CAR STACKERS TO ENCROACH INTO THE SETBACK
REQUIREMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 2901 PACIFIC
COAST HIGHWAY, VASEK POLAK BMW DEALERSHIP
CONSIDERATION OF THE REVOCATION OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR VASEK POLAK BMW DEALERSHIP AT 2901 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
Mr. Schubach gave staff report. He stated that these three hearings are all related to
the same property and could be addressed together. He stated that earlier in the day he
had met with the new architect on this project who was hired by the applicant to actually
revise the plans. After the meeting, staff found that there is a possibility that this
project could be designed so that a variance is not necessary for the car stackers along
the westerly property line.
Mr. Schubach stated that staff would like the applicant to submit more detailed plans;
therefore, it would be desirable to continue this hearing so that staff would have an
opportunity to study the revised plans.
— P.C. Minutes 10/17/89
Mr. Schubach stated that there has been concern over the auto parts shop not being part
of either the BMW or Subaru dealerships. The applicant, therefore, would like to have
two separate CUPs as opposed to one master conditional use permit. He noted, however,
that this issue needs to be addressed further.
Mr. Schubach recommended that this matter be continued, and the applicant concurred
that it be continued. He stated that the issue should be continued to a date certain, but
he cautioned that the agenda for the next meeting is quite full.
Public Hearing opened at 7:48 P.M. by Comm. Ingell.
Gerry Compton, 200 Pier Avenue, project architect, addressed the Commission: (1) he
mentioned that he has not had a lot of time to study this issue, but has been discussing
the matter with the applicant; (2) he said that most of the problems appear to have
solved by Mr. Polak; (3) he discussed the CUP modification and stated that there is a
question as to whether or not a variance is actually needed for the retail parts supply
house; (4) he gave background information as to how this matter arose; (5) he stated that
implications have arisen in regard to the parts storage, and the issue needs to be
evaluated further by the applicant and his advisors; (6) he said there is a
misunderstanding of a "warehouse use", and this parts area is not specifically going to be
used for warehousing; (7) he stated that a continuance is necessary in order to resolve
these questions which have arisen.
Mr.: Compton continued: (1) he stated that the plans for the master CUP also present
problems, because the plans are not very specific; (2) he discussed the car stackers, and
stated that issues arise in relation to the setbacks and what constitutes a structure for a
car stacking arrangement; (3) he continued by discussing car stackers and how cars would
be placed; (4) he said more cars can park in a car stacker than other configurations; (5)
he discussed the request that the stackers be moved from the used car lot, and he noted
that they were placed there at the request of the City Manager, but he will have to study
that matter in more depth to get additional information; (6) he stated that there is an
issue of timing because the stackers were put in before the current setback requirements
were imposed, but if there is a problem with the neighbors, the stackers will be
relocated; (7) he discussed the eight -foot setback and the previous zoning standards, and
he explained that the stackers were put there before the current requirements.
Mr. Compton went on: (1) he stated that all of the issues need to be carefully addressed
by both staff and the applicant; (2) he hoped that the current stackers could either be
modified or, if a variance is required, the applicant will return with a specific request;
(3) he described the location of the stackers in relation to the neighbors; (4) he said that
the neighbors will not be able to see either the stackers or the cars; (5) he discussed the
revocation of the existing CUP for the BMW dealership and stated that the applicant
appears to have solved the previous problems, and the applicant has worked with the
neighbors to solve the problems; (6) he explained the current conditional use permits and
stated that there are currently three CUPs existing, but it now appears that both BMW
dealerships could have one -combined CUP; (7) he noted that these businesses are on a
heavily traveled commercial corridor and there are bound to be problems; (8) he
suggested that neighbors contact either the applicant or the general manager if there are
problems which need to be addressed.
Arlene Howell, 2966 La Carlita Place: (1) noted concern that neighbors seem to be left
out of the planning process; and (2) asked that neighbors be included in the planning and
stipulations which are set forth.
- 7.6 -
P.C. Minutes 10/17/89
Ruth Sullivan, 2954 La Carlita Place: (1) noted confusion over some of the issues
concerning the stackers and the number of proposed parking spaces; (2) discussed
Condition No. 13 and asked for clarification on the hours of operation for auto repair and
stated that 7:00 A.M. until 9:00 P.M. on weekdays seems excessive; (3) noted concern
over the noise factor if repairs are allowed five nights a week; (4) discussed the wall and
landscaping and asked for clarification on the proposed landscaping.
Comm. Peirce asked about the hours for auto repair and agreed that the proposed hours
do seem excessive. He suggested that the applicant address that issue.
Larry Bryant, 2960 La Carlita Place: (1) agreed with Resolution 89-80, stating that the
eight -foot setback should be required; (2) noted concern over the 20 -foot fire lane being
maintained; (3) discussed Condition No. 20 and the retaining wall which was originally to
be along the property line, and he explained that there is now erosion on the property and
there are no provisions relating to this issue; (4) stated that any landscaping plan should
take into consideration the issue of erosion.
Mike Pitton, chairman of the 30th Street neighbors group: (1) stated that the neighbors
do not have a vendetta against Vasek Polak's business; (2) stated that the neighbors have
not been demanding a revocation hearing, rather they have asked that the existing CUP
be enforced; (3) asked only that the applicable laws be adhered to; (4) noted concern that
the CUP and development agreement are still not being acted upon after almost 20
years; (5) noted concern that no one seems to know what to do about these issues; (6)
reiterated what has been proposed for the Commission to adopt and read from the actual
proposal; (7) stated that the proposal is not clear and specific; (8) noted concern that the
plans have not yet been revised; (9) suggested that the staff study this issue so that the
matter can finally be resolved.
Wilma Burt, 1152 7th Street: (1) noted concern that staff does not get its work done or
accomplish much; (2) felt there is no excuse for the wall to extend beyond the property
line, and noted that -the telephone pole must be accessible; (3) noted that the neighbors
have complained many times, but nothing has been done to solve the problems; (4) noted
concern over time and money being waster in the City.
Mr. Compton rebutted: (1) stated that they would be happy to obtain as much input as
possible from the neighbors and citizens group; (2) stated that a landscaping sprinkler
system will be installed and erosion will be taken into account; (3) in regard to erosion
control, he stated that a drain has been provided to one of the neighbors so that water
can drain properly; (4) stated that erosion can many times be prevented if appropriate
steps are taken; (5) stated that the neighbors must talk to the business to work out the
problems, and the CUP is designed to take care of many of the problems; (6) said that the
telephone pole is not on public property, but rather on property which was vacated to Mr.
Polak, and the telephone pole is on an easement.
Mr. Lee clarified that each of these three noticed issues should be considered as
independent public hearings; even though they all relate to the same property. He stated
that the issue of the revocation can be addressed at this time if so desired by the
Commission. He continued by discussing other options which could be taken at this time.
Mr. Schubach discussed Condition No. 13 and the hours of operation for auto repair. He
said that a development agreement was signed by the City and Mr. Polak several years
ago. This condition was included as a part of that development agreement, which
actually supercedes the conditional use permit. He noted that it would be necessary to
obtain an agreement with Mr. Polak if the City desires to have conditions which are
--
21 "— P.C. Minutes 10/17/89
different from those specified in the development agreement with the City. He stated,
however, that the applicant does not have hours of auto repair until 9:00 P.M. even
though the hours are in the agreement.
Mr. Schubach clarified the issue of the revocation, and he explained that the applicant is
under no obligation to provide any plans in relation to that issue. He stated that the
plans are only in conjunction with the issue of the requested amendment.
Mr. Schubach concluded by recommending that this matter be continued to the meeting
of November 21, 1989.
Comm. Peirce clarified for the benefit of the audience the issue of the development
agreement. He stated that the Planning Commission made recommendations; however,
the document was extensively modified by the City Council. He said that the
Commission never recommended that auto repairs be allowed until 9:00 P.M.
Comm. Peirce questioned whether the development agreement is actually even within
the purview of the Planning Commission. He asked who enforces the development
agreement provisions.
Bill Grove, Director of Building and Safety addressed the Commission and explained that,
while review of the agreement is within the Planning Commission jurisdiction,
enforcement of the agreement is by court action. He said that it differs from a
conditional use permit in that CUPs can be enforced by the City; whereas, development
agreement enforcement must be done by order of a court.
Comm. Peirce asked, hypothetically, how revocation of a development agreement could
be accomplished.
Mr.. Lee explained the legal procedures for such an action, stating that development
agreements are quite complex. He noted, however, that cities must act in good faith and
cannot take action which substantially differs from the intent ofthe development
agreement. He noted, though, that changes can be made to the development agreement,
if warranted and if agreed to by the applicant.
Mr. Lee, in response to a question by Comm. Ingell, explained that a development
agreement takes precedence over any conditional use permits which have been previously
issued.
MOTION by Comm. Ingell, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to continue this hearing (all three
matters) to the meeting of November 21, 1989.
Comm. Ingell did not feel a revocation hearing would be appropriate at a time when an
attempt is being made to solve the problems. He urged the neighbors to contact the
general manager in an attempt to reach an agreement to solve any problems associated
with these businesses. –.
Comm. Peirce noted that progress seems to have been made between the neighbors and
the applicant. He felt that a well -drawn plan of the use would be helpful for future
enforcement and for future commissions.
-- 2g — P.C. Minutes 10/17/89
AYES: Comms. Ingell, Ketz, Peirce
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Comms. Moore, Rue
TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING VIEW BLOCKAGE AND HEIGHT MEASUREMEN/
T
METHOD AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION /
�_ •
Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated October 11, 1989. Staff recommended t} Wthe
proposed resolution be adopted to amend the definition of height and the measurement
method to the "averaging" method. ,
/ r
P-
it
;
Ii'.
At the February 21, 1989, meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a
revised text amendment using the current height measurement method rather than the
proposed "averaging" method to make the definition of height more precise and the
procedure more clear. /
Staff continues to recommend the averaging method, however, because of its clear
advantage in minimizing view blockage and in simplicity 2zif measurement. Staff
requested the Planning Commission to consider its analysis which responds to the
Commissioners' concerns about the averaging method.
Staff recognized that the PI\ ing Commission may rec 'mmend to the City Council to
focus efforts on refining the current method. However, prior to taking on that effort,
the averaging method will be forwarded to the City C6uncil for final consideration.
At the February meeting, the Planning Com fission had strong reservations about
changing the height measurement method to/Manhattan Beach's averaging method.
Although the Planning Commission seemed\to/agree that view blockage would be reduced
by a new method, there was concern that }icing the averaging method would encourage
more bulky buildings, flatter roofs, and/1'ess''dversity of architectural design. Other
concerns noted during public testimony i cluded tat the averaging method does not work
well on steeper slopes.
Staff prepared additional diagram showing the buil2ling envelopes under each method
assuming different slopes to address the issues of bulkiness, flat roofs, and diversity, and
to show the importance of the ,rule limiting height to 20 )rcent above the height limit.
As one can see, because of/ the 20 percent rule, the averaging method would not
necessarily result in flatter roofs, and on the steeper lots ould result in multi-level
roofs. Also, while the aparent bulkiness of structures may be neater on the upside of a
street, with up to a 20 percent higher building face, the lower side of the street would
have a much less bulkjappearance, and in the steeper areas the reduction of bulk from
the street could be aS much as 100 percent. On the balance, the averaging method could
actually reduce the/overall appearance of bulk and would encourage diversity in the bulk
from the upside nd the downside of a street.
Staff also included diagrams addressing different slopes affecting standard sideways
sloping lots/
The clear advantage to the averaging method would be to lessen view blockage it areas
of steeper slopes. Also, staff felt that contrary to making buildings bulkier an less
diverse, it would encourage more diversity in how the bulk is placed on the lot, increasing
the' diversity along a series of lots or along a street. Also, it is doubtful that the
P.C. Minutes 10/17/89
CAR STACKERS IN THE EXISTING LOCATION
1
I
AR A KERS TO BE Ms ED TO THIS ARE,
• •
•
/� Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885
t i
Citi o f2-iermosarl3eackv
Mr. Vasek Polak, President
Vasek Polak Enterprises, Inc.
199 Pacific Coast Highway
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Re: Code Violations
Dear Mr. Polak,
November 30, 1989
fEC 1988
This letter is to advise you of code violations regarding your
operation that require your immediate attention.
The locations are as follows:
1) 2775 Pacific Coast Highway -
The Subaru dealership has been replaced by a Volkswagen
dealership without obtaining the requisite business license.
Several signs indicating "Volkswagen" have been installed without
benefit of permit. It appears that the area of the signs exceeds
that which is allowed.
You were previously advised by City Manager, Kevin B. Northcraft
in a letter dated August 28, 1989 that sign permits would be
necessary for any sign changes due to a change in the make of
vehicle offered. You are therefor directed to obtain the correct
business license and submit a sign review application by Monday,
December 4, 1989 or face citation for those violations.
2) 2851 Pacific Coast Highway -
The Subaru dealership has been relocated to this site including
installing signs without obtaining the requisite conditional use
permit or sign permits.
You have been advised on several occasions that the use of this
site for automobile dealership purposes is subject to a
conditional use permit. In fact, you currently have an
application on file for expansion of the BMW dealership onto this
site.
Your flagrant disregard for zoning regulations has left us no
alternative but to issue you citations for these
3) 2901 Pacific Coast Highway -
-3
t
violations -SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
We continue to receive complaints for violation of the
development agreement in the following areas:
1) Employee parking on Thirtieth Street.
2) Test driving of vehicles on Thirtieth Street.
3) Transport truck deliveries on Thirtieth Street.
4) Loud car alarm demonstrations.
Staff is recommending to the Planning Commission that appropriate
conditions consistent with the provisions of the development
agreement be added to your conditional use permit. As such,
future violations will be citable as an infraction. As you know,
the public hearing on this matter is scheduled for December 5,
1989.
Your continued disregard for zoning regulations and agreed to
conditions of operation is perplexing and counterproductive to
the goal of resolving commercial and residential conflicts.
It is.,mysincere hope that you will immediately correct all code
and development agreement violations in order to avoid future
legal proceedings.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to
contact me at 318-0235.
Yours Truly,
William Grove
Director,
Dept. of Bldg. & Safety
CC: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager
Michael Schubach, Planning Director
Mary Fehskens, Business License Inspector
• 4
v
i (l 4
City of 4iermosa 7Jeach.
Richard E. Lucy
2916 Tennyson Place
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Dear Mr. Lucy:
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885
November 21, 1989
NOV 2 2 198g
I am writing in response to your letter of November 10, 1989,
regarding negative impacts of the Vasek Polak BMW dealership on
residents in the 30th Street area.
I appreciate both your understanding of the efforts we have made
to date, as well as you letting us know of the continuing prob-
lems you are experiencing. Letters such as yours represent an
important source of feedback on the adequacy and appropriateness
of our services, and we thank you for making us aware of these
concerns.
We will again be working with the dealership to try to make a
more long term solution to these violations of conditions. By
copy of this letter, your complaint also will be logged with the
Planning and Building Departments, both of which are involved in
various important efforts regarding the dealership.
Again, thank you for your time and interest in helping us improve
the quality of life for our community.
Sincerely yours,
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
cc: Planning
Building - for action and response.
City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379-3312 / 376-6984 • Fire Department 376-2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376.6984
-- 3 4--
0
2916 Tennyson Place Nov
Hermosa Beach, CA 92054 1 / 1989
November 10, 1989
Mr. Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley drive
Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885
Re: Vasek Polak BMW
Dear Mr. Northcraft:
Although many of the items enumerated in your March 24, 1989 letter to 30th Street residents
have been corrected, two areas need some work:
(1 ) A BMW employee continues to park on 30th Street at Tennyson Place, the driver of
a burgundy Chevy pick-up, California license #2A75271. My April 12, 1989
letter to you listed the same complaint about the same vehicle.
(2) BMW salesmen continue to constantly use 30th Street for test drives, all hours of
the working day, seven days a week. This was addressed in paragraph 5 of your
letter, but is being ignored by the dealership.
Thank you for your interest and follow-up on these matters.
Richard E. Lucy
cc:
Vasek Polak BMW
Pacific Coast Hwy at 30th Street
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
2916 Tennyson Place
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
April 12, 1989
Mr. Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
Dear Mr. Northcraft
J
Thank you for your letter of March 24, 1989 to the 30th Street residents. Regarding items #1
and #5 of your letter:
(1) Employee parking along 30th Street has declined dramatically since the time of the
meeting. The only employee vehicle still parking on 30th Street near Tennyson is a
burgundy colored Chevy pick-up, California license #2A75271
(5) Although the test drives down 30th Street have diminished, they have by no means
vanished. The dealership needs to re-emphasize this phase of its good neighbor program.
I was very impressed by the attitude of the BMW representatives at the meeting and feel that
they have made substantial progress on the issues outlined.
torYour ul /
Richard E. Lucy
cc: Vasek Polak BMW
Pacific Coast Highway at 30th Street
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
City of Hermosa Beach
Planning Commission
Civic Center
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
j.�
2954 La Carlita Place
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
October 16, 1989
1113T 1 198g
Gentlemen:
Our property is located on La Carlita Place, immediately to
the west of the Vasek Polak car dealership at 2901 Pacific Coast
Highway. We would like to comment on Conditional Use Permit 89-13
which is currently pending before the Planning Commission. In
particular we would like to call attention to the following three
items:
NuItem 13: Permitted Operation Hours For Auto Repair
This condition would permit auto repair activities from
'� 7:OOAM to 9:OOPM on weekdays; in our opinion, this is excessive
and is beyond the intent of the current CUP. Current use is from
7:00 AM to 5:00 PM on weekdays and Saturdays except for Thursday
nights, where repairs continue until 7:30 PM. No repair work is
permitted on Sundays.
The Commission should be aware that it is Vasek's practice
to keep noisy mechanical equipment, such as air compressors,
running throughout the permitted repair hours. The extension of
hours allowed in Condition 13 would permit this noise during all
the prime evening hours when residents are present and is not
warranted.
The hours permitted for auto repair should be kept as they
are: from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM except on Thursdays, when operation
to 9:00 PM is permitted, and no repairs permitted on Sunday.
Item 15: Car Alarm Systems
Car alarms are loud obnoxious noises emanating from the
Vasek properties; the disruptive sound from these alarms can be
heard throughout the neighborhood. This type of noise is totally
unwarranted and is not an essential part of conducting an
automobile business any more than demonstrating horns. The
alarms can and should be disconnected prior to service; this is a
trivial procedure. Actual noise tests should be conducted
indoors.
The whole point of the Zoning Process is to prohibit
commercial activity that generates loud and obnoxious noises. To
grant an exception based on necessity is to contradict the
fundamental principal involved; a business that of necessity
creates loud and obnoxious noises should not be permitted at all.
Item 20: Landscaping of Sloping Areas
This is an unclear condition; we cannot tell from the the
description what areas are subject to improvement by landscaping
since the entire property line "slopes" to some extent.
-37--
x
ur
chard W. and Ruth R. Sullivan
d
October 8, 1989
.Mr. Michael Schubach
Planning Director
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
OCT I Y11989
RE: City of Hermosa Beach Public Notice -
2851-2901 Pacific Coast Highway, Vasek Polak BMW and
Subaru Dealerships
Dear Mr. Schubach:
I am sorry that I will be out of town and unable to attend the
above referenced hearing as I am deeply troubled by Mr. Polak's
operation.
I would like to officially complain about the incessant and
excessive noise emanating from the BMW and Subaru agencies at
2851 through 2901 Pacific Coast Highway. My home at 714 Marlita,
where my family and I have resided since 1957, directly adjoins
these properties to the west. The noise comes from a'hoist, air
compressor, various trucks, and the scores of automobiles which
are unloaded, prepped and tested no more than 25 feet from my
family room window. The noise level has increased steadily over
the years (along with Mr. Polak's sales volume) and is now
totally unbearable. A compressor at the rear of the BMW property
operates all day and often late into the night (as testified by
my numerous calls logged to the Hermosa Beach Police Department).
Also to be noted, drums of imflammable liquids are stored un-
covered along our residential property and emit a strong (proba-
bly toxic) odor.
All of my complaints to Mr. Polak as well as to the City have
fell upon deaf ears. It is inconceivable that such an annoying
and potentially dangerous commercial operation is permitted
Mr. Michael Schubach
October 8, 1989
Page Two
directly adjacent to a residential (bedroom) community.
sincerely hope that the City of Hermosa Beach will take immediate
and forceful action to end this intolerable situation.
Sincerely,
Lyndon J. Koontz
LJK:kea
WB:019
P.S. On a related matter, the block wall directly at the rear of
the Subaru agency (installed by Mr. Polak) is too high and
extremely dangerous. The top of the wall is at a level to a
section of my bank some eight feet from the pavement. Children
often play on this bank and wall and there is a great likelihood
that someone will be severally injured or killed from a fall to
the pavement below. My numerous complaints to Mr. Polak and the
City have been totally disregarded. This dangerous situation
must be corrected immediately!
2954 La Carlita Place
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
October 4, 1989
City of Hermosa Beach
Planning Commission
Civic Center
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
Gentlemen:
16/s-fg5 •
Our property is located immediately to the west of the Vasek
Polak car dealership at 2901 Pacific Coast Highway.
We would like to comment on the petition by Vasek for a
variance of the setback provision from 8 feet to 2 feet for the
purpose of installing two tier car storage racks.
We appreciate previous efforts of Vasek and the City to
control noise and other nuisances related to the use of the
former alley. Because of these efforts there have been some
improvements in the noise situation. It seems to us, however,
that the installation of car storage racks in the area
immediately behind our residence is a step backwards.
Installation, maintenance and use of the racks would add
additional noise directly adjacent to residential property. The
racks themselves are potentially noisy mechanical equipment and
this is a use substantially different from the current use of the
property, which is simply to park automobiles. The racks are
considered an undesirable nuisance where they are now, a fact
documented in several City Council meetings. Moving them behind
our property certainly does not change this.
We feel that the City has not adequately assessed the noise
potential of the racks and the associated hydraulic equipment.
We ask that the City reject the setback variance.
We also suggest that any noise associated with operation,
maintenance or installation of the racks be strictly restricted
to the hours of 8-5 on Monday through Friday.
cer,e , y,
Richard W. and Ruth R. Sullivan
VASEK POLAK BMW - 2901 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
List of complaints submitted to Kevin B. Northcraft, Monday,
September 6, 1989 by Michael Pitton.
This printed list is a reproduction of the original handwritten
list.
1) Parking employees and customers
A - Violation of Development Agreement, item b, line 9,
4.
B
pg.
giolation No. 86976928 - requiring employer to
provide parking.
2) Car Carriers
1 - Violation of 8-5.9 Zoning Ordinance.
Memo of 12-13-88 by City Mgr to Vasek.
"2 - Letter from City Mgr May 15/89 stating racks will
be removed by June 89.
3) Unloading equipment, towed cars, deliveries.
- Violation of Development Agreement item G, line
5 "no 30th St. delivery"
3, pg
4) Development Agreement
1) Fees never paid (1500)
See complaint by Kathy Midstokke letter to City Mgr.
8-12-86.
This is a violation of City Regulations and also
violation of Development Agreement p 6, line 9 "no
waiver of standard, fees and review"
5) Loud paging system
Violation of 1969 C.U.P.
Violation 1969 P.C.154-762, item 1
Violation 1969 P.C.154-706, item 8
Violation Development Agreement pg 5, item i, line 10
Violation C.U.P. Article 8
6) Alarm Demo
- Violation C.U.P.
- Violation P.C. 154-762 pg 1, item 2 (no noises)
- Violation of P.C. 154-706 pg 1, item 4 (no display)
7) Test driving
- Violation C.U.P. PC 154-706 "no display"
- Violation Development Agreement pg 4, item D, line 15 (no
road testing)
- Violation Ordinance 86-830 pg 2, line 6
8) Vacations of Alleys
Gould - 30th
- We contest validity of legality of closure
- We contest the fulfillment of financial payback "+$250,000
a year in sales taxes"
- We request that City Council will be shown proof of
financial payback to the city.
1986 4 1989 = 3 years = 250,000 X 3 = 750,000 to the City!
We contest also the closing of alley between longfellow and
30th.
- deal?
- financial payback?
reasons?
This was done in the only interest of One party Vasek.
9) Business hours
to be stictly respected
7am - 8pm week
8am - 7pm weekend
and not like today from 7am to past 9pm which is more than 14
hours daily.
END
CITIZENS CONCERN GROUP 30TH STREET...CITIZENS CONCERN. GROUP 30TH STREET
THE HONORABLE JUNE WILLIAMS
MAYOR,CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS,
CITY HALL,1315 VALLEY DRIVE
HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254.
RE: RESIDENTS VS VASEK POLAK CORP.
MN/MP
DEAR MADAM MAYOR & COUNCILMEMEERS,
JULY 14,1989.
C,c�E./VeO
JUS
274989 989
As CHAIRMAN OF THE "CITIZENS CONCERN GROUP 30TH ST":ONCE AGAIN,I COME
TO YOU WITH THE FEELING OF OUR RESIDENTS,THEIR OUTRAGE,THEIR INDIGNA-
TION TOWARD A SITUATION THAT YOUR ADMINISTRATION HAS NOT ONLY ILLEGALY
PERMITTED BY LACK OF ADEQUATE SURVEY OR CONCERN FOR THE WELL BEING OF
YOUR FAVORITE TAXPAYER BUT HAS ALSO ENCOURAGED TO OCCUR BY ITS REPEATED
LENIENCY FOR THE APPLICATION OF OUR LAWS AND RESPECT FOR OUR RESIDENTS.
FOR TWO YEARS, WE HAVE COME TO YOU WITH OUR JUSTIFIED GRIEVANCES AND AS-
KED YOU TO ONLY APPLY THE LAW AND ENFORCE IT.IN RETURN,WE WERE OFFERED
KIND _WORDS AND PROMESSES,MEETING THROUGH YOUR CITY MANAGER WHO THOUGHT
WITH A CHILDISH ARROGANCE THAT TIME WILL COOL US DOWN WHILE HE WAS STREN-
GHTENING HIS RELATIONSHIP AND CONSOLIDATE HIS POWER OVER THE CITY.TO THI:
DAY,THE ONLY RESULT WE HAVE SEEN HAS BEEN THE DETERMINATION OF ONE MAN,
ON HIS OWN,WHO HAS MADE OUR STREET PARKING MORE EASY.THAT MAN: DENNIS
SHORDER IS THE ONLY ONE AND FOR THIS DESERVES OUR THANKS AND RESPECT.
BUT FOR YOUR ADMINISTRATION MADAM WE HAVE RECEIVED WORDS,PROMESSES,
CONCERN AND WIDE UNDERSTANDING,YOU HAVE EVEN SENT A LETTER TO MR VASEK
TO COMPLY BUT AT THE SAME TIME YOU HAVE MADE SURE THAT. IT WAS NOT ENFOR-
CEABLE AND TIME RESUMED FOR YOU AS PEACEFULL AS EVER.YOU EVEN GAVE VASEK
A CEREMONY TO REWARD HIM CF HIS DEDICATION TO HERMOSA.YOU COULD NOT
PREVENT HIM OF DOING ANYTHING HE WISHED BUT YOU COULD STOP IN ONE DAY
THE BUILDING OF OUR EMERGENCY SERVICE! YOU COULD STOP ANYBODY WILLING TO
REMODEL A SMALL HOUSE,BUT YOU COULD NOT STOP HIM TO TRANSFORME ILLEGALY
THE "BORELLI RESTAURANT"! YOU COULD RUINE ANYBODY IN THE WAY OF YOUR
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BUT YOU MADE SURE THAT VASEK DIDN'T HAVE TO RESPE(
HIS C.U.P,HIS BUILDING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NOR PAY FOR THE REQUIRED
PERMIT,YOU GAVE HIM ONE ALLEY IN VIOLATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODE
UNDER THE FALSE PRETENSE THAT IT WILL BRING TO US :250.000$ REVENUES!
WE DO NOT HAVE A CITY HALL,WE HAVE A COMIC OPERA HOUSE AND°'OUR MOTTO
HAS BECAME: "NO SHAME".
WE REQUEST THAT YOU PUT THE RENEWAL OF THE BUILDING AGREEMENT OF THE
VASEK POLAK CORPORATION ON THE NEXT AGENDA FOR PUBLIC MEETING AND HEARIN(
CONCERNING THE VIOLATIONS TOWARD OUR LAWS,C.U.P & DEVELOP AGREEMENT AND
LET'S ONE FOR ALL AND IN PUBLIC PLAY THE "DIVINE COMEDY OF DEMOCRACY".
PLEASE RECEIVE MADAM M-Y--SIINCERE SALUTATIONS.
MICHAEL ,° ITTON
CHAIa.IAN CITIZENS CONCERN GROUP.
-43-
V( ----Y OF HERMOSA BTACH
PROJECT ADDRESS 2851. Pacific Coast Hiwav,
Hermosa each, Ca 9r;25!I
Project Name (If applicable)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tract #1594 S 100 Ft of N
LOt A
1.0 1ti O1
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name(s) Vase_ Polak
350 Ft of
H
Phone
ZONING Commercial
213-376-0935
Mailing Address P.O. Box 8002, Redondo Beach, Ca 90277
Applciant's Relationship to Property Owner'
//:711.
:p.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE.. DATE
PROJECT REQUEST
x Conditional Use Permit -Commercial
_ Conditional Use Permit -Condominium
Number of Units
_ Development Agreement
Environmental Staff Review
Final Subdivision
(Parcel/Tract Map)
General Plan
Lot Line Adjustment
Lot Split
Parking Plan
Precise Plan
Specific Plan
Specific Plan Amendment
Tentative Subdivision
(Parcel/Tract Map)
Zone Change
Zone Variance
TOTAL FEES
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY- Date of submittal:
Received by:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Additional rar
stora y for Poraoha. Audi. 1 MW. Saah; Subaru_ nartc.
0101 341-e-3
(attach additional pages if necessary)
OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT*
•
Wei: Vasek Polak being duly sworn, depose and say that_we/I
w ner am the owner of the property involved in this application and that
n ° ht foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
Jciee:with submitted are true and,correct to the best of our/my knowledge
Z#an,belief.
U
oza `'nth day of August , 19 89.
cribed and sworn before me this
Signed 7/42�
Owner's Address:
199 Pacific Coast Hiwfty
r,\..�'-4:.4.zcic.( 7i. ,..i, 6L-! Hermosa Beach, Ca 90L54
NOTARY PUBLIC Telephone 219-976-0995
nd for the County of Los Angel
tlt- e of California. es . '_
* Signature required from current property owner,ynot owner ipescrow‘
4 ~u
(SEAL)
OFFICIAL SEAL
I, the undersigned, do declare under penalty of perjury
that I did on the ;Thri day of At-c6=-;i,7/;,�n ,
deposit into the United States post office, first cla-s-s--�
postage prepaid, a copy of the public notice attached as
Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached as Exhibit "B".
I warrant that the persons named on Exhibit "B" are all the
persons required by applicable law to receive the public notice
attached as Exhibit "A".
I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to
cause these public notices to be made in an accurate and timely
fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liabilitl
whatsoever for any defect of said notice or notices.
In the event an action is instituted in a court of corn.
petent jurisdiction which questions the legality of the public
notices, then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend
all hearings or cause the cessation of any construction or of
any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was
held in accordance with the public notice. In the event that
the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be
effective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke
any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to
those public notices to be declared null and void and I agree
on behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns or successors-in-intere
to hold the City harmless in connection therewith.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is
true and correct.
I- have executed this declaration on this the Z04 da of
, 19 o at Hermosa Leach, California. y
J
L '�S 3vci PCH .
•
State 'of California )
County of LosAngeles ) SS
Y6, _ Yln;C r 77/-6-
(name)
/L(.
(name)
(SigCZ ( L -St--,
nature) -
(Capacity)
On this the 041,e day of , 1970 before
me, (J /-'44-t4. e under fined Notary
Public, personally appeared
proved to me on the basis of satfsfaiforf evide ce to be
the person(s) whose name(s) _sb subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged that 54-E
executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal.
LINDA RIDDLE
NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA
PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My Comm. Exp. April 9, 1993
Not.ry Public
•