HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/23/90Honorable Mayor and Members
January 17, 1990
City Council Meeting
of the City Council of January 23, 1990
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS, NOVEMBER 1989
Attached are the reports for 41% of this fiscal year. Revenues
in the General Fund are 43.2%; again adjusting for this year's
sale of city -owned lots and unreceived property taxes, revenue is
slightly ahead of budget at 43.9%. The Parking Fund has received
40.3% of its estimated revenue.
Expenditures in the General Fund, adjusted for the transfer of
property sale proceeds are under budget at 37%. Parking Fund
expenditures at 37% are below budget by $100,657.
As you know, Midyear Budget Review is scheduled for February 13,
1990. A more detailed look at the first half of the year will be
taken and any revisions to estimated revenue or appropriations
will be made at that time.
Concur:
if
- ,---77-77,-;/- 01:17/_etitct)
Kevin B. Northcraft Viki Copeland
City Manager Finance Director
Attachments
VC/sd
//�
CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS
MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY
OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M.
CLOSED FRIDAYS
Where there is no vision the people perish...
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are
participating in the process of representative government. Your
government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the
City Council meetings often.
It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new
items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by
the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have
all matters covered within the time allowed.
CITY VISION
A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile,
financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct
business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded
full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by
visitor/users; led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship
role for community resources and displays a willingness to
explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy
leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council
is dedicated to_learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa
Beach for tomorrow's challenges today.
Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986
NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers
THE' HERMOSA BEACH MEM tom' MEUMERABALNIT
Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of -gou sxmr,„, 'fifth atVitlyYfanager ap-
pointed by and responsible to the City Counciil. Ear ryt g'.out ATroamtiJ1 policy. The.
Mayor and Council decide what is to be done... The laity ;ifflivagtr„ mpecattng through
the entire City staff, does it. This separation ed amigiLry .maklaog and a idmaiari.stration
is considsered the most economical and efficiieuatt .&arm Dail City m v yn the
United States today.
GLOSSARY
The following explanations may help you to tndircarandi ti} mama fsamii om msst agen-
das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Crrnril..
Consent Items
A compilation of all routine matters to be mooed urpny thy m ,sores,, Epppmmal re-
quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Couus` akcember can mamma arra Utem from this
listing thereby causing that matter to be cmetfiileraii unt&r the catt nnryy CWmaent Cal-
endar items Removed For Separate Discussion..
Public Hearings
Public Hearings are held on -certain matters aa mezxubr rh iby Raw.. Mile Hirazr:3a s afford
the public the opportunity to appear and formailli'y cera rens theft wthecy meegattfl ng the
matter being heard. Additionally, letters may Eat falled ;wdth ;tdaae (Ciu erk•, prior
to the Hearing.
Hearings
Hearings are held on other matters of public is gmatsarnrn Forma wtiriith: Ihre , la me legal
requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hitau inq,,,
Ordinances
An ordinance is a law that regulates governum at memoriam amaoripriam cac:tenct.. All •
ordinances require two "readings". The first twatihng lottt ihnr tttha mm jlmance into
the records. At least one week later Councia mi g :adapt„ t jbi�tt ar iholdl yes the
ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular acibihmmss`e3. is ke adrfbcert Ht) -days after the
second reading. Emergency ordinances are gwzema iby ci E Fe:*atnt gomntarimns amd waive
the time requirements.
Written Communications
The public, members of
communicate to or make
with the City Clerk by
Miscellaneous Items and
advisory boards/comm is;MiiaOMB ALM azwodzaalorra ma wally
a request of Council d7.y Itxttrta.z; aaeikd omens .� he filed
the Wednesday preceeiiiinga tttal alwilizar City/ (f'lumr t awmting.
Reports City Managt
The City Manager coordinates departmental relnn sa ansiil h2^in} Sltelmatly title attention
of, or for action by the City Council.
. Verbal reports may be given by the City Managg r meporillmg ittmomam= nn the. agenda,
usually having arisen since. the agenda was peapancrail corn trite.; onlecorifitoz Wednesday.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Counci-tJl
Members of the City Council may place items rny.mie; agem:n xbtr snneaAkibn-a lam :by the
full Council.
Other Matters - City Council
These are matters that come to the attention rnE u Qountii% aasmifet+: an$ttrr uibliicatlon
of the Agenda.
Oral Communications from the Public - Mattetm toff am un me
Citizens wishing to address the City Council am air:: utrogarargimn. . nut eMsewilnere con-
sidered on the agenda may do so at this time.. •-
Parking Authority
The Parking Authority is a financially separa2Gex cotTut.m, that iist agmmaammil as as inte-
gral part of the City government.
Vehicle Parking District No. 1
The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Rartikimg ice:% iitsifetn., It's pur-
pose is to oversee the operation of certain Orwmaz‘mqmotklimicLimos maul a wise pro-
mote public parking in the central business'diisum_ict-
"Progress begins with the belief that
what is necessary is possible."
-Norman Cousins
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, January 23, 1990 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Closed Session - 6:30 p.m.
Regular Session - 7:30 p.m.
MAYOR CITY CLERK
Roger Creighton Elaine Doerfling
MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER
Chuck Sheldon Gary L. Brutsch
COUNCILMEMBERS CITY MANAGER
Robert Essertier Kevin B. Northcraft
Kathleen Midstokke CITY ATTORNEY
Albert Wiemans Charles S. Vose
All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in
the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City
Clerk.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the
Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to
speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal
Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on
items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction
will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit
comments to three minutes.
Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental
operations are requested to submit those comments to the City
Manager.
1.
CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be
acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con-
sent of the City Council. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by
a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed
will be considered under Agenda Item 3.)
(f)
Kx i6d
Recommendation to approve the following minutes:
1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on January
9, 1990;
2) Adjourned regular meeting of City Council held on
January 11, 1990;
Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants
Nos. through inclusive.
Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
Recommendation to receive and file December, 1989 City
Treasurer's report.
Recommendation to receive and file November, 1989
Revenue and Expenditure report. Memorandum from Finance
Director Viki Copeland dated January 17, 1990.
Recommendation to receive and file December, 1989 month-
ly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer
Gary L. Brutsch dated January 9, 1990.
Recommendation to adopt resolution approving draft Cir-
culation, Transportation and Parking Element of the
3gGeneral Plan. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
VU -v Schubach dated January 16, 1990.
tit
(k)
Recommendation to approve waiver of parking fees for the
Sand and Strand run on Sunday, February 11, 1990. Memo-
randum from Acting Community Resources Director Mary
Rooney dated January 4, 1990.
Recommendation to authorize Mayor to sign agreement for
preliminary Engineering Services for Community Center
Electrical Upgrade to John Snyder and Associates at a
cost of $5,880. (Continued from January 9, 1990 meet-
ing.) Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony
Antich dated January 16, 1990.
Recommendation to approve schedule for Environmental
Impact Report, General Plan amendment, Conditional Use
Permit, and Lease Agreement for oil production. (Con-
tinued from January 9, 1990 meeting.) Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 17,
1990.
Recommendation to receive and file the following 1988-89
Financial reports:
1) Comprehensive Annual Financial and Audit report,
and
2) Management Letter.
Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated
January 3, 1990. (Continued from January 9, 1990
meeting.)
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES.
ORDINANCE NO. 90-1022 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE TO ADD GYMNASIUM/HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER AS
A PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2, RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL ZONE,
WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING
STANDARDS FOR SAID USE AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRON-
MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption.
*****************************************************************
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS - MUNICIPAL MATTERS CONTINUED FROM THE
JANUARY 9, 1990 MEETING:
9. PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON VALLEY DRIVE BETWEEN GOULD AND
HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL.
A. SIGHT DISTANCE AT 24TH STREET AND 24TH PLACE;
B. CONSIDERATION OF BIKEWAY ON VALLEY DRIVE.
Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich
dated January 2, 1990.
.11. REPORT ON RAMIFICATIONS OF WITHDRAWAL FROM THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. Memorandum from City
Attorney Charles S. Vose dated January 4, 1990.
12. RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT EMPLOYER/EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION
RELATIONS RESOLUTION. Memorandum from Personnel Direc-
tor Robert Blackwood dated January 1, 1990.
*****************************************************************
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.
5. PROPOSED RESOLUTION ADJUSTING THE PARKS AND RECREATION
IN -LIEU FEE. Memorandum from Building and Safety Direc-
g12 for William Grove dated January 11, 1990.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
6. RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD BID FOR USER FEE STUDY. Memo-
randum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated January
16, 1990.
7.- RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE HIRING OF A CONSULTANT FOR
RELOCATION OF CITY YARD FEASIBILITY STUDY. Memorandum
from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January
17, 1990.
(b)
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
Annual report of activities for calendar year 1989.
Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated
January 16, 1990.
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
Agenda for February 15, 7 p.m. joint meeting with Plan-
ning Commission. Memorandum from Planning Director
Michael Schubach dated January 16, 1990.
Agenda for February 22, 7:30 p.m. joint meeting with
Chamber of Commerce. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin
B. Northcraft dated January 17, 1990.
10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests
(a)
q6/
(b)
(c)
from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
Request by Councilmember Midstokke for discussion of
rezoning and disposition of the Biltmore site. (Con-
tinued from December 12, 1989 and January 9, 1990
meetings.)
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis-
cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a
future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council
action tonight.
Request by Councilmember Wiemans for discussion of
requiring conditional use permit for new commercial
developments such as hotels. (Continued from December
12, 1989 and January 9, 1990 meetings.)
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis-
cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a
future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council
action tonight.
Request by Councilmember Sheldon for discussion re.
zoning standards in residential zones, i.e., lot
coverage, parking, setbacks, etc.; and height limit,
setbacks, parking and bulk in commercial zones. (Con-
tinued from December 12, 1989 and January 9, 1990
meetings.)
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis-
cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a
future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council
action tonight.
CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on
the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do
so at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - DECEMBER 1989
FUND GENERAL
NUMBER ACCOUNT
12/1/89
BALANCE
CASH
ADJUSTMENTS
WARRANTS
ADJUSTMENTS
12/31/89
BALANCE
001 GENERAL $2,136,425.82
105 LIGHTING DISTRICT 1,232,978.68
110 PARKING 180,590.17
115 STATE GAS TAX 376,630.60
120 COUNTY GAS TAX 12,764.38
125 PARK REC.FAC.TAX 1,650,844.95
126 RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 1,740,216.89
127 6% UTILITY USERS TAX 108,890.51
130 REVENUE SHARING -0-
140 CDBG 117,685.50
145 PROPOSITION A FUND 349,168.17
150 GRANT FUND 12,570.05
155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT 25,851.84
160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 1,459,399.62
170 POLICE ASSET SEIZURE 81,637.27
180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 291,522.38
705 SELF INSURANCE FUND 507,446.54
$10,284,623.37
TRUST
ACCOUNTS
$1,566,429.24
131,349.55
149,468.99
26,201.90
- 0-
6,767.00
52,564.38
56,011.18
-0-
2,235.00
20,614.00
- 0-
29.987.52
80.00
6,183.63
9,820.55
-0-
$2,057,712.94
$158,078.82
2,566.28
474.10
1,098.16
41.56
13,082.93
-0-
198.64
-0-
247.08
643.49
5,460.19
68.22
98,818.87
8,682.90
602.32
75,839.15
$ 365,902.71
$ 635,436.63
8,960.38
73,008.82
- 0-
- 0-
5,579.79
- 0-
-0-
- 0-
1,105.15
3,639.98
5.86
4,122.62
10,461.81
30,745.70
6,200.00
8,917.08
$ 788,183.82
$ 98,089.29
1,948.15
119,255.15
3,939.33
4,000.00
416.67
1,464,559.59
112,897.58
-0-
- 0-
117.46
- 0-
556.00
3,146.09
6,697.88
3,294.00
9,903.00
$1,828,820.19
$3,127,407.96
1,355,985.98
138,269.29
399,991.33
8,805.94
1,664,698.42
328,221.68
52,202.75
-0-
119,062.43
366,668.22
18,024.38
51,228.96
1,544,690.59
59,060.22
292,451.25
564,465.61
$10,091,235.01
BALANCE
RECEIVED
PAID
BALANCE
STATEMENT
BALANCE
PAYROLL
$9,665,759.69
INACTIVE DEPOSIT
$2,409.96
$288,657.30 $513,360.25
INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY FISCAL AGENT
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY
$396,684.34
INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE
$559,591.62
$560,138.54
$1,863.04
GARY BRUT CH, CIT REASURER
JANUARY 18, 1990
GENERAL $
PAYROLL
OUTSTANDING CHECKS
INACTIVE DEPOSIT
BALANCE
144,211.90
872.88
145,084.78
6,403.72
138,681.06
9,954,416.99
10,093,098.05
ld
FINANCE-FA484
--TIME 15:06:00
FUND
013J DESCRIPTION
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3101
3102
3103
3106
3107
3108
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
OBJECT
SUBTOTAL
3200 LICENSES
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
3207
3209
3210
3211
3212
3213
3214
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
/CURRENT YEAR SECURED
/CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED
/PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS
/SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL SB813
/TRANSFER TAX
/SALES TAX
/CABLE TV FRANCHISE
/ELECTRIC FRANCHISE
/GAS FRANCHISE
/REFUSE FRANCHISE
/TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY
/BUSINESS LICENSE
AND PERMITS
/DOG LICENSES
/BICYCLE LICENSES
/BUILDING PERMITS
/ELECTRIC PERMITS
/PLUMBING PERMITS
/OCCUPANCY PERMITS
/GARAGE SALES
/BINGO PERMITS
/BANNER PERMITS
/ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS
/ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE
/AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT
3300 FINES & FORFEITURES
3301 /VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS
3303 /COURT FINES/POLICE DEPT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3400 USE
3401
3402
3403
3404
3405
3406
3411
OF MONEY & PROPERTY
/INTEREST INCOME_
/RENTS & CONCESSIONS
/PIER REVENUE
/COMM CTR LEASES
/COMM CTR RENTALS
/COMM CTR THEATRE
/OTHER FACILITIES
EST REV
2, 557, 596. 00
183, 850. 00
220, 000. 00
60, 000. 00
129, OB7. 00
1, 790, 309. 00
101, 678. 00
36, 641. 00
33, 973. 00
127, 000. 00
176, 814. 00
445, 000. 00
5. 861, 948. 00
14, 000. 00
200. 00
170, 000. 00
38, 000. 00
30, 000. 00
6, 000. 00
65.00
100.00
1, BOO. 00
150.00
3, 500. 00
390. 00
264, 205. 00
130, 000. 00
45, 000. 00
175, 000. 00
145, 820. 00
1, 450. 00
10, 500. 00
68, 000. 00
47, 000. 00
34, 000. 00
60, 000. 00
MONTHLY REV
0. 00
0. 00
36, 999. 17
0. 00
0. 00
167, 000. 00
27, 717. 97
0. 00
0. 00
6, 857. 73
47, 332. 57
25, 894. 38
311, 801. 82
3, 264. 75
138.00
9, 094. 08
5, 547. 50
3, 932. 00
325. 00
12.00
0. 00
0. 00
200.00
385.00
30.00
22, 928. 33
7, 767. 35
4, 129. 74
11, 897. 09
19, 790. 53
183.15
1, 255 50
8, 364. 00
3, 853. 00
2, 269. 00
2, 81 1 . 50
YEAR TO DATE
0. 00
167, 852. 33
156, 345. 94
35, 062. 18
48, 744. 8h
735, 392. 57
54, 958. 58
0. 00
0. 00
43, 390. 45
91, 23B. 16
142, 503. 31
1, 475, 488. 38
13, 073. 50
183. B5
69, 773. 19
23, 562. 50
17, 152. 00
1, 725. 00
39.00
0 00
100.00
450. 00
2, 392. 00
150. 00
128, 601. 04
42, 256. 73
19, 983. 59
62, 240. 32
74, 830
BOO
6, 406
35, 952
24, 803
12, 388
35, 916
37
07
00
00
50
50
00
PAGE 0001
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE
2, 557, 596. 00
15, 997. 67
63, 654. 06
24, 937. 82
BO, 342. 14
1, 054, 916. 43
46, 719. 42
36, 641. 00
33, 973. 00
83, 609. 55
85, 575. 84
302, 496. 69
4, 386, 459. 62
926. 50
16.15
100, 226. 81
14, 437. 50
12, 848. 00
4, 275. 00
26. 00
100.00
1, 700. 00
300.00-
1 , 108 00
240. 00
135, 603. 96
87, 743. 27
25, 016. 41
112, 759. 68
70, 989. 63
649.93
4, 094. 00
32, 048. 00
22, 196. 50
21, 611 50
24, 084. 00
0. 0
91. 2
71. 0
58. 4
37. 7
41. 0
54. 0
0. 0
0. 0
34. 1
51. 6
32. 0
25. 1
93. 3
91. 9
41. 0
62. 0
57. 1
28. 7
60. 0
0. 0
5. 5
300. 0
68. 3
38. 4
48. 6
32. 5
44. 4
35. 5
51. 3
55. 1
61. 0
52. 8
52. 7
36. 4
59. 8
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 15: 06: 00
FUND
013J DESCRIPTION
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY u PROPERTY
3412 /TENNIS COURTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE
3504
3505
3507
3508
3509
3510
3511
3514
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
{
/IN LIEU OFF HIGHI•JAY
/IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE
/HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE
/MANDATED COSTS
/HOMEOWNER PROP TX RELIE
/POST
/STC -SVC OFF TRAINING
/CIGARETTE TAX
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
3801 /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION
3802 /SIGN REVIEW
3803 /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
3806 /BOARD OF APPEALS
3808 /ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW
3809 /TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW
3810 /FINAL MAP REVIEW
3811 /ZONE CHANGE REVIEW
3812 /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW
3813 /PLAN CHECK FEES
3814 /PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL
3815 /PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES
3817 /SPECIAL CURB MARKING
3818 /POLICE SERVICES
3819 /JAIL SERVICES
3820 /TRUSTY ADMIN FEE
3821 /FINGERPRINT SERVICE
3823 /SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY
3824 /VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES
3825 /PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING
3826 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES
3827 /LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT
3831 /STREET CUT INSPECTION
3834 /ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
3836 /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE
38:37 /RETURNED CHECK CHARGE
3838 /SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO
EST REV
MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE
10, 000. 00 957. 50 4, 903. 25
376, 770. 00 39, 484. 18 195, 999. 69
393. 00 0.00 203.83
708, 891. 00 61, 083. 91 297, 839. 78
3, 500. 00 1, 043. 48 1, 043. 48
0. 00 0. 00 6, 755. 00
65, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00
14, 000. 00 9, 360. 17 19, 663. 52
8. 500. 00 3, 000. 00 3, 000. 00
47, 323. 00 3, 628. 96 18, 432. 73
847, 607. 00 78, 116. 52 346, 938. 34
15, 000. 00 840. 00 4, 440. 00
700. 00 150. 00 425. 00
7, 590. 00 230. 00 1, 930. 00
300. 00 75. 00 150. 00
3, 520. 00 0. 00 640. 00
5, 400. 00 450. 00 2, 925. 00
1, 500. 00 125. 00 1, 925. 00
1 , 800. 00 0. 00 320. 00
19, 520. 00 1, 920. 00 12, 480. 00
1 15, 000. 00 16, 684. 64 41, 707. 79
2, 398. 00 266. 50 583. 00
10, 000. 00 952. 64 3, 670. 33
300. 00 0. 00 0. 00
15, 000. 00 1, 272. 50 7, 911. 75
23, 000. 00 1, 190. 00 4, 250. 00
3, 000. 00 186 50 186. 50
3, 000. 00 132. 00 1 , 163. 50
15, 000. 00 18, 382. 96 36, 379. 60
3, 000. 00 186. 00 1, 263. 00
100. 00 10. 00 20. 00
30, 650. 00 80. 00 6, 700. 00
4, 517. 00 0. 00 0. 00
15, 000. 00 325. 00 4, 395. 90
17, 616. 00 720. 00 5, 075. 00
7, 500. 00 874. 20 3, 203. 60
800. 00 40. 00 351. 20
2, 000. 00 99. 40 470. 90
PAGE 0002
DATE 12/13/89 iJ
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE
5, 096. 75
180, 770. 31
189. 17
411, 051. 22
2, 456. 52
6, 755. 00-
65, 000. 00
5, 663. 52-
5, 500. 00
28, 890. 27
500, 668. 66
10, 560. 00
275. 00
5, 660. 00
150. 00
2, eao. 00
2, 475. 00
425. 00-
1, 480. 00
7, 040. 00
73, 292. 21
1, 815. 00
6, 329. 67
300.00
7, 088. 25
18, 750. 00
2, 813. 50
1, 836. 50
21.379.80-
1 , 737. 00
80.00
23, 950. 00
4, 517. 00
10, 604. 10
12, 541. 00
4, 296. 40
448 BO
1, 529. 10
49. 0
52. 0
51. 8
42. 0
29. 8
0. 0
0. 0
140. 4
35. 2
38. 9
40. 9
29. 6
60. 7
25. 4
50. 0
18. 1
54. 1
128. 3
17. 7
63. 9
36. 2
24. 3
36. 7
0. 0
52. 7
18. 4
6. 2
38. 7
242. 5
42. 1
20. 0
21. 8
0. 0
29. 3
28. 8
42. 7
43. 9
23. 5
u
•
J
•
•
J
J
•
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 15:06:00
FUND
OBJ DESCRIPTION
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3800 CURRENT
3839
3840
3841
3856
3857
3858
3859
3861
3862
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
SERVICE CHARGES
/PHOTOCOPY CHARGES
/AMBULANCE TRANSPORT
/POLICE TOWING
/GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
/PKG PLAN APPLICATION
/TENANT REFUSE BILLING
/REFUSE LIEN FEE
/HAZARDOUS MAT PERMIT
/ALARM PERMIT FEE
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3901
3902
3903
3904
3913
3955 OPERATING
3956
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
/SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP
/REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR
/CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT
/GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS
/CITY OFFICES RECYCLING
TRANSFERS IN
/RESDL EQUITY TRSFR IN
DEPT 0000 TOTALS
FUND TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
EST REV
700. 00
8, 500. 00
26, 500. 00
900. 00
960. 00
200. 00
500. 00
2, 500. 00
0. 00
363, 971. 00
5, 000. 00
500, 00
500. 00
500.00
180. 00
1, 638, 949. 00
118, 836. 00
1, 764, 465. 00
9, 653, 966. 00
9,653,966 00
MONTHLY REV
78. 15
309. 00
1, 750. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
140. 00
47, 469. 49
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
17. 00-
0. 00
135, 329. 08
9, 903. 00
145, 215. 08
YEAR TO DATE
578. 65
2, 669. 00
10, 797. 50
0. 00
320. 00
140. 00
0. 00
0. 00
410. 00
157, 482. 42
1, 056, 669. 14
416. 41
7, 055. 73
754. 87
63. 81
691, 645. 40
49, 515. 00
1, 806, 120. 36
656, 912. 51 . 4, 172, 870. 55
656, 912. 51 4, 172, 870. 55
PAGE 0003
DATE 12/13/89
41.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE
121.35 82. 6
5, 831. 00 31. 4
15, 702. 50 40. 7
900. 00 0. 0
640. 00 33. 3
60. 00 70. 0
500. 00 0. 0
2, 500. 00 0. 0
410. 00- 0. 0
206, 488. 58 43. 2
1,051,669.
83.
6, 555.
254.
116.
947, 303.
69, 321.
41, 655.
14-
59
73-
87-
19
60
00
36-
5, 481, 095. 45
5, 461, 095. 45
21133. 3
83. 2
1411. 1
150. 9
35. 4
42. 2
41. 6
102. 3
43. 2
43. 2
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0004 —1
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89 ,
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3101 /CURRENT YEAR SECURED 322,094.00
3103 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 26,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 348, 094. 00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 61, 230.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 61,230.00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 /OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 492.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 492.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 409,816.00
FUND TOTAL 409, 816.00
0. 00
1, 463. 58
1, 463. 58
6, 207. 97
6, 207. 97
0. 00
0. 00
7, 671. 55
7, 671. 55
0. 00
14, 052. 24
14, 052. 24
35, 272. 29
35, 272. 29
492. 00
492. 00
49, 816. 53
49, 816. 53
322, 094. 00
11, 947. 76
334, 041. 76
25, 957. 71
25, 957. 71
0. 00
0. 00
359, 999. 47
0. 0
54.0 •
4. 0
57.6
57. 6
100. 0
100. 0
12. 1
359, 999. 47 12. 1
,
1
•e
•
J
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 15:06:00
FUND
ODJ DESCRIPTION
110 PARKING FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
3300 FINES & FORFEITURES
3302 /COURT FINES/PARKING
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401
3407
3409
3413
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3800 CURRENT
3842
3843
3844
3845
3846
3847
3848
3849
3850
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
/INTEREST INCOME
/PARKING LOT RENTAL
/LOT D
/VPD LEASE
SERVICE CHARGES
/PARKING METERS
/PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL
/DAILY PARKING PERMITS
/VPD LOT PERMITS/DAILY
/VPD LOT PERMITS/MONTHLY
/VALIDATION STAMPS
/DRIVEWAY PERMITS
/GUEST PERMITS
/CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3902
3904
3955
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT 0000
FUND TOTAL
•r
y
/REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR
/GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS
/BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN
TOTALS
EST REV
1, 585, 746. 00
1, 585, 746. 00
18, 830. 00
16, 707. 00
22, 990. 00
70, 000. 00
128, 527. 00
600, 000. 00
185, 000. 00
1, 658. 00
6, 200. 00
8, 680. 00
15, 000. 00
250.00
900. 00
2, 000. 00
619, 6138. 00
50. 00
50.00
3, 033. 00
3, 133. 00
2, 537, 094. 00
2, 537, 094. 00
MONTHLY REV
74, 743. 00
74, 743. 00
1, 127. 61
1, 992. 25
1,915.84
3, 901. 56
8, 937. 26
52, 885. 10
1, 221. 00
0. 00
869. 40
1, 090. 20
1, 968. 36
0. 00
87. 00
100. 00
58, 221. 06
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
YEAR TO DATE
575, 333. 58
575, 333. 58
6, 912. 30
8, 361. 25
9, 579. 20
36, 688. 06
61, 540. 81
343, 495. 55
16, 711. 00
885. 00
3, 770. 39
3, 753. 45
13, 627. 32
391. 00
513.00
600. 00
383, 746. 71
0. 00
0. 00
3, 033. 00
3, 033. 00
141, 901. 32 1, 023, 654. 10
141, 901. 32 1 , 023, 654. 10
PAGE 0005 -=-,•
DATE 12/13/89
41. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
J
UNREALIZED
BALANCE
1, 010, 412. 42 36. 2
1, 010, 412. 42 36. 2
11, 917. 70
8, 345. 75
13, 410. 60
33, 311. 94
66, 986. 19
256, 504. 45
168, 289. 00
773. 00
2, 429. 61
4, 926. 55
1, 372. 68
141.00-
387. 00
1, 400. 00
435, 941. 29
50.00
50.00
0. 00
100. 00
36. 7
50. 0
41. 6
52. 4
47. 8
57. 2
9. 0
53. 3
60. 8
43. 2
90. 8
156. 4
57. 0
30. 0
46. 8
0. 0
0. 0
100. 0
96. 8
1, 513, 439. 90 _ 40. 3
1, 513, 439. 90 40. 3
W
L.
•
J
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0006
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND 013J DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
115 STATE GAS TAX FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY 1. PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
18, 685. 00 1, 761. 93 9, 255. 09
18, 685. 00 1, 761. 93 9, 255. 09
•
9, 429. 91 49.5 p•
9,429 91 49. 5
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE J
3501 /SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 85, 690. 00 5, 985. 65 28, 863. 11 56, 826. 89 33. 6
3502 /SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 176, 184. 00 13, 364. 64 58, 827. 37 117, 356. 63 33.3 J
3503 /SECT 2107. 5 ALLOCATION 4, 000. 00 0. 00 4, 000. 00 0. 00 100. 0
3522 /TDA ARTICLE 3 (S13821) 10, 764. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 764. 00 0. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 276, 638. 00 19, 350. 29 91, 690. 48 184, 947. 52 33. 1
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 10, 000. 00 416. 67 7, 083. 35 2, 916. 65 70. 8
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10, 000. 00 416. 67 7, 083. 35 2, 916. 65 70. 8
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 305, 323. 00 21, 528. 89 108, 028. 92 197, 294. 08 35. 3
FUND TOTAL
305, 323. 00 21, 528. 89 108, 028. 92
197, 294. 08 35. 3
J
J
•
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0007
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 1,745.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,745.00
3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY
3601 /COUNTY AID TO CITIES 48, 000. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 48, 000. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 49, 745.00
FUND TOTAL 49, 745. 00
81.87
81. 87
0. 00
0. 00
81.87
680. 21
680. 21
0. 00
0. 00
680. 21
81. 87 680. 21
1, 064. 7 9 38. 9
1, 064. 79 39. 9
48, 000. 00 0. 0
48, 000. 00 0. 0
49, 064. 79 1. 3
49, 064. 79 1. 3
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0008
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3116 /PARK REC FACILITY TAX 50, 000. 00 45, 738. 00- 13, 068. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 50, 000. 00 45, 738. 00- 13, 068. 00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 25, 405. 00 8, 074. 03 39, 351.02
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25, 405. 00 8, 074. 03 39, 351. 02
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3910 /PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU 175, 000. 00 45, 738. 00 71, 874. 00
3956 /RESDL EQUITY TRSFR IN 1, 056, 506. 00 0. 00 1, 056, 505. 60
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 231, 506. 00 45, 738. 00 1, 128, 379. 60
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 306, 911. 00 8, 074. 03 1, 180, 798. 62
FUND TOTAL 1, 306, 91 1.00 8, 074. 03 1, 180, 798. 62
v
36, 932. 00
36, 932. 00
13, 946. 02-
13, 946. 02-
103, 126. 00
0. 40
103, 126. 40
126, 112.38
26. 1
26. 1
154. 8
154. 8
41.0
99. 9
91. 6
90. 3
126, 112. 38 90. 3
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0009
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND 013J DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3120 /UTILITY USER TAX 816, 508. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 816, 508. 00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 20,525.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20, 525. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 837, 033. 00
FUND TOTAL 837, 033. 00
74. 087. 62 335, 953. 51
74. 087. 62 335, 953. 51
0. 00 17, 772, 25
0. 00 17. 7 72. 25
74. 087. 62 353, 725. 76
74. OB7. 62 353, 725. 76
4880, 554. 49
480, 554. 49
2, 752. 75
2, 752. 75
483. 307. 24
483, 307. 24
41. 1
41. 1
86. 5
86. 5
42. 2
42. 2
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0010
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3120
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
/UTILITY USER TAX
1, 224, 762. 00
1, 224, 762. 00
1 1 1, 131. 41 503, 930. 23
1 1 1 , 131. 41 503, 930. 23
3400 USE OF MONEY ?y PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 2,890.00 540.38 3,116.48
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,890.00 540.38 3, 116. 48
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 227, 652.00 111, 671.79 507, 046.71
FUND TOTAL 1, 227, 652.00
1 1 1 , 671. 79 507, 046. 71
720, 831. 77
720, 831. 77
226.48-
226.48-
720,605.29
26.48-
226.48-
720,605.29
41. 1
41. 1
107. 8
107. 8
41. 3
-720,605.29 41. 3
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0011-
TIME 19:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89 • !!
41.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3700 INTERGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL
3713
3714
3715
3716
3717
3718
3719
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT 0000
FUND TOTAL
/HOUSING REHABILITATION
/PROJECT TOUCH
/CDBG ADMINISTRATION
/SO BAY FREE CLINIC
/JUVENILE DIVERSION
/S0 BAY COALITION ALIVE
/1736 HOUSE
TOTALS
1..
0. 00 582. 31
0. 00 582. 31
92, 072. 00
7, 670. 00
12, 276. 00
4, 200. 00
3, 000. 00
1, 000. 00
2, 544. 00
122, 762. 00
122, 762. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
582. 31
122. 762. 00 582. 31
3, 020. 26
3, 020. 26
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3, 020. 26
3, 020. 26
3. 02.0. 26-
3, 020. 26-
92. 072. 00
7, 670. 00
12, 276. 00
4, 200. 00
3, 000. 00
I, 000. 00
2, 544. 00
122, 762. 00
119, 741. 74�
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
2. 4
119, 741. 74 2. 4
•
•
•
J
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (8Y FUND) PAGE 0012
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3117 /PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 200, 000. 00 0. 00 87, 862. 00
3121 SUBREGNL INCENTIVE FUNDS 16, 331. 00 0. 00 0. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 216, 331. 00 0. 00 87, 862. 00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 12, 270. 00 1, 734. 08 8, 916. 79
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12, 270. 00 1, 734. 09 8, 916. 79
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
3854 /FARES, DIAL A RIDE 7, 800. 00 0. 00 0. 00
3855 /BUS PASSES 4, 000. 00 486. 00 2, 137. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 11, 800. 00 486. 00 2, 137. 00
3900 OTHER REVENUE •
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 340. 00 0. 00 340. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 340. 00 0. 00 340. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 240, 741. 00 2, 220. 08 99, 255. 79
FUND TOTAL 240, 741. 00 2, 220. 09 99, 255. 79
112, 138 00 43. 9
16, 331.00 0. 0
128, 469. 00 40. 6
3,353.21 72.6
3,353 21 72.6
7, 800. 00 0. 0
1 , 863. 00 53. 4
9, 663. 00 18. 1
0. 00 100. 0
0. 00 100. 0
141. 485.21 41.2
141, 485.21 41.2
•
•'
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0013• --
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7.
150 GRANT FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
2, 31 5. 00
2, 315. 00
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE
3517 /OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFET 45,500.00
3528 • /PER CAPITA GRANT 60, 000. 00
3529 /WILDLIFE GRANT 20, 204. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 125, 704. 00
3700 INTERGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL
3701 /FEDERAL AID URBAN 585, 520. 00
3712 /FED EMERG MGMT AGENCY 89,738.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 675. 258. 00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 64,388.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 64, 308. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 867, 665. 00
FUND TOTAL 867,665.00
157. 26 1, 575. 75 739. 25 68. 0
157. 26 1, 575. 75 739. 25 68. 0
0. 00 0. 00 45, 500. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 60, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 20, 204. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 125, 704. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 585, 520. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 89, 738. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 675, 258. 00 O. 0
5. 365. 67 26, 828. 35 37, 559. 65 41. 6
5, 365. 67 26, 828. 35 37, 559. 65 41. 6
5, 522. 93 28, 404. 10 839, 260. 90 3. 2
5. 522. 93 28, 404. 10 839, 260. 90 3. 2
a
J
e
•
1
' J
J
1.7
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0014
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
155 CROSSING GUARD FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3101
3103
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
/CURRENT YEAR SECURED
/PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
73, 495. 00
5, 000. 00
78, 495. 00
1, 010. 00
1, 010. 00
0. 00
267. 27
267. 27
151. 24
151.24
0. 00
3, 102. 18
3, 102. 18
73, 495. 00
1, 897. 82
75, 392. 82
944. 00 66. 00
944. 00 66. 00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 303. 00 0. 00 303. 00 0. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL_ 303. 00 0.00 303. 00 0. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 79, 808. 00 418. 51 4, 349. 18 75, 458. 82
FUND TOTAL 79, 808. 00 418. 51 4, 349. 18 75,.458. 82
0. 0
62. 0
3. 9
93. 4
93. 4
100. 0
100.0
5. 4
5. 4
1
•
IJ
s
J
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0015
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.07, OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
160 SEWER FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
60, 610. 00
60, 610. 00
6, 725. 63
6, 725. 63
3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY
3602 /BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANC 5,000.00 623.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 623. 00
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
3828 /SEWER CONNECTION FEE 25,000.00 0.00
3829 /SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 1,200.00 40.00
3832 /SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 3, 000. 00 25. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 29, 200. 00 65. 00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1, 155, 753. 00 96, 230. 92
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 155, 753. 00 96, 230. 92
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 250, 563. 00 103, 644. 55
FUND TOTAL 1, 250, 563. 00 103, 644. 55
36, 004. 56
36, 004. 56
623. 00
623. 00
4, 008. 33
608. 54
150. 00
4, 766. B7
482, 136. 60
482, 136. 60
523, 531. 03
523, 531. 03
24, 605. 44 59. 4
24, 605. 44 59. 4
4, 377. 00 12. 4
4, 377. 00 12. 4
20, 991. 67 16. 0
591. 46 50. 7
2, 850. 00 5. 0
24, 433. 13 16. 3
673, 616. 40
673, 616. 40
727, 031. 97
41. 7
41. 7
41.8
727, 031. 97 41. 8
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0016
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3300 FINES S. FORFEITURES
3304 /FORFEITED FUNDS 200, 000. 00 3, 454. 41 26, 529. 15 173, 470. 85 13. 2
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 200, 000. 00 3,454.41 26, 529. 15 173, 470. 85 13. 2
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 5,900.00 514.95 3,216.54 2,683.46 54.5
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5,900.00 514. 95 3, 216. 54 2,623.46 54. 5
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 205, 900.00 3,969.36 29, 745.69 176, 154.31 14.4
FUND TOTAL 205, 900.00 3,969.36 29, 745.69 176, 154.31 14.4
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
I FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0017
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4, 980. 00
4, 980. 00
1, 436. 61 7, 98B. 94
1, 436. 61 7, 988. 94
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3912 /FIRE_ FLOW FEE 130,000.00 2,,635.62- 44,239.38
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 130, 000. 00 2,635.62- 44, 239. 38
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 134, 980.00 1, 199. 01- 52, 228.32
FUND TOTAL 134, 980. 00 1, 199. 01- 52, 222. 32
3.008. 94- 160. 4
3, 008. 94- 160. 4
85, 760. 62 34. 0
85, 760. 62 34. 0
82, 751. 68 38. 6
82, 751. 68 38. 6
•
A
•
J
J
•
•
6
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0018
TIME 15:06:00 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.07% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
705 INSURANCE FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 37, 785.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 37, 785. 00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 0.00
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1,764.00
3957 /TRANSFER IN -DEPT INS SVS 899,168.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 900, 932.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 938, 717.00
FUND TOTAL
REPORT TOTALS
V
2,375.34
2,375.34
0. 00
0. 00
74, 930. 89
74, 930. 89
77, 306. 23
938, 717. 00 77, 306. 23
20, 168, 676. 00 1 , 214, 394. 54
12, 311.74
12, 311. 74
40, 788. 94
1, 764. 00
374, 654. 89
417, 207. 83
25, 473. 26
25, 473. 26
40,788.94-
0.00
0,788.94-
0.00
524, 513.11
483, 724. 17
429, 519. 57 509, 197. 43
429, 519. 57 509, 197. 43
8, 566, 675. 34 11, 602, 000. 66
32.5
32. 5
0. 0
100. 0
41. 6
46. 3
45. 7
45. 7
42. 4
1
e.
•
r
r
•
•
•
(..
•
•
r'
(.
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1101 CITY COUNCIL
DEPT:
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4319 SPECIAL EVENTS
4396 TRSFR OJT --INS U'0ER CH'S
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
LEGISLATIVE
21, 540. 00
431. 00
431. 00
18, 000. 00
40, 402. 00
6, 000. 00
6, 000. 00
200. 00
9, 000. 00
5, 900. 00
5. 250. 00
1, 000. 00
3, 519. 00
24, 869. 00
100. 00
100.00
71, 371. 00
1121 CITY CLERK DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBE3I!IP
27, 815. 00
556 00
556.00
12, 000 00
40, 927. 00
20, 300 00
20, 300 00
544.00
2, 200 00
220 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
1, 828. 04
0. 00
1, 024. 80
1, 650. 00
4, 502. 84
2, 500. 00
2, 500. 00
27. 73
713. 33
0. 00
75.00
105.91
294. 00
1, 215. 97
0. 00
0.00
8, 218. 81
2, 371. 00
0. 00
0. 00
949 99
3, 320 99
0 00
0. 00
44 77
108 17
0 00
9, 107. 28
0. 00
1, 146. 86
6, 451. 00
16, 705. 14
6, 000. 00
6, 000. 00
B1. 45
4, 961. 41
2, 805. 00
1, 020. 35
105.91
1, 469. 94
10, 444. 06
0. 00
0. 00
33, 149. 20
11,218 00
O 00
O 00
4,949 99
16,167 99
100 00
100 00
466 87
331 09
105.00
F
PAGE 0001
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 030. 84
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 030. 84
0. 00
0. 00
1, 030. 84
0.00
O 00
0. 00
O 00
O 00
O 00
O 00
O 00
112 13
O 00
12, 432. 72
431. 00
' 715.86-
11,549.00
15.86-
11,549.00
23, 696. 86
0. 00
0. 00
118. 55
3, 007. 75
3, 095. 00
4, 229. 65
894.09
2. 049. 06
13, 394. 10
100. 00
100. 00
37, 190. 96
16. 597. 00
556.00
556.00
7, 050. 01
24, 759 01
20, 200. 00
20, 200. 00
77.13
1,756.78
115 00
42. 2
0. 0
266. 0
35. 8
41. 3
100. 0
100.0
40. 7
66. 5
47. 5
19. 4
10. 5
41. 7
46. 1
0. 0
0. 0
47.8
40. 3
0.0
0.0
41.2
39. 5
0. 4
0. 4
85. 8
20. 1
47. 7
i^
•
f '
•
•
r
r
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV ODJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1121 .CITY CLERK
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0002
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4323 PUBLIC NOTICING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EGUIPMENT-LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
450. 00
600. 00
8, 800. 00
2, 950. 00
15, 764. 00
800. 00
800. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
234. 30
1, 259. 78
246. 00
1, 893. 02
0. 00
296. SO
3, 731. 24
1, 229. 85
6, 160. 85
0. 00 367. 32
0. 00 367. 32
77, 791. 00 5, 214. 01
1122 ELECTIONS DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
20, 650. 00
20, 650. 00
150. 00
700.00
400.00
300 00
1, 550. 00
60.49
60.49
0. 00
420.63
0. 00
349.10
769.73
22.200. 00 830. 22
1131 CITY ATTORNEY DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
" 4300 MATERIALS/SUPFLIES/OTHER
• 4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
150,000.00
3, 000. 00
153, 000 00
2, 400. 00
1, 650 00
1, 000 00
5, 050 00
6. 879 49
0 00
6. 879 49
18.47
66 27
0 00
84.74
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
112. 13
450. 00
303. 20
5, 069. 76
1, 720. 15
9, 491. 02
0. 00 432. 68
0. 00 432. 68
22, 796. 16 112. 1.3
1, 339. 51-
1, 339. 51-
287. 00
694. 01
0. 00
411.60
1,392.61
395. 10
395. 10
0. 00
199. 31
0. 00
0. 00
199.31
53.10 594.41
36,639 49
145. 60
36,785 09
135 10
137.19
0 00
272.29
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
0.00
48.70
0 00
48 70
0.0
49. 4
42. 4
41. 6
39. 7
45. 9
45. 9
54,882. 71. .29. 4
21. 594. 41
21, 594. 41
4. 5
4. 5
137. 00- 191. 3
193. 32- 127. 6
400. 00 0. 0
1 1 1. 60- 137. 2
41. 92- 102. 7
21, 552.49 3. 9
113, 360. 51
2, 854. 40
116, 214. 91
2, 264. 90
1, 464. 11
1, 000. 00
4, 729. 01
24. 4
4. 8
24. 0
5. 6
11.2
0. 0
6. 3
FINANCE-FA454
f TIME 12: 23: 53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
CITY OF
HERMOSA
EXPENDITURE SUMMARYREPORT BEACH
YHFUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 PAGE 0003
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
APPROPRIATION
DIVISION TOTAL 1 58, 050.00
r` 6,964.23
1132 CITY PROSECUTOR
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 23,440.00
25, 440. 00
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
. 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 14,000.00
14, 000. 00
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
•
•
DIVISION TOTAL
1141 CITY TREASURER
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
1, 144. 00
1, 144. 00
2, 120. 00
2, 120. 00
37, 057. 38 48. 70
10, 600. 00
10, 600. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
95. 00 475. 31
95. 00 475. 31
40, 584. 00 2, 215. 00
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
12, 807. 00
500. 00
256. 00
256. 00
9, 000. 00
22, 819. 00
2, 000. 00
2, 000. 00
700.00
1, 400. 00
185.00
250.00
500.00
2, 083. 00
5, 118. 00
1, 070. 00
0. 00
0. 00
247. 00
750. 00
2, 067. 00
25.00
25.00
44. 51
107.29
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
174.00
325.80
800. 00 0. 00
800 00 0 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
11, 075. 31 0. 00
5, 210. 00
501. 99
0. 00
247. 00
3, 750. 00
9, 708. 99
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
83 50 0. 00
83. 50 0. 00
184.58
585.95
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
869.59
1, 640. 12
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
120, 943. 92 23. 4
14, 840. 00
14, 840. 00
14, 000. 00
14, 000. 00
668. 69
668. 69
41. 6
41. 6
0. 0
0. 0
41. 5
41. 5
29, 508. 69 27. 2
7, 597. 00
1. 99-
256. 00
9. 00
5, 250. 00
13, 110. 01
1, 916. 50
1, 916. 50
515. 42
814. 05
185.00
250.00
500.00
1,213.41
3, 477. 88
40. 6
100. 3
0. 0
96. 4
41. 6
42. 5
4. 1
4. 1
26. 3
41. 8
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
41. 7
32. 0
800. 00 0. 0
800. 00 0. 0
r
r
r
•
•
r
r
r
•
w
n
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12: 23: 53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1201 CITY MANAGER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
30, 737. 00
400, 733. 00
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE_ OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1202 FINANCE ADMIN DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
101, 616. 00
1, 848. 00
1, 848. 00
3, 900. 00
109, 212. 00
300. 00
300. 00
800.00
1, 500. 00
350. 00
125. 00
1, 150. 00
3, 500. 00
2, 900. 00
6, 544. 00
16, 869. 00
126, 381. 00
MGMT/SUPPORT
197, 020
2, 523
3, 055
3, 055
1, 000
208, 253
00
00
00
00
00
00
81,910 00
81,910 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
2, 417.130
25, 860. 07
8, 147. 65
0. 00
1, 024. BO
122. 50
9, 294. 95
11. 50
11. 50
33.44
532. 63
8. 75
0. 00
0. 00
93. 95
0. 00
545. 00
1, 213. 77
10, 520. 22
15, 330. 28
76.49
101.83
2, 215 41
1, 595. 13
19, 319 14
3, 835. 00
3, 835. 00
11,432.61
115,563.76
40, 787. 51
0. 00
1, 146. 68
199. 50
42, 133. 69
138. 50
138. 50
215. 14
940. 62
70.55
90. 07
531. 38
93. 95
1, 094. 86
2, 725. 31
5, 761. BB
40, 034. 07
77, 901. 92
1, 733. 53
101 83
2, 338 91
2, 110. 41
84, 186 60
26, 231.17
26,231. 17
PAGE 0004
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
1, 786. 08
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
0. 00
19, 304. 39
2133, 383. 16
60, 828. 49
1, 848. 00
701. 32
3, 700. 50
67, 078. 31
161. 50
161. 50
584. 86
559. 38
279. 45
34. 93
618. 62
3, 406. 05
1, 805. 14
3, 818. 69
11, 107. 12
78, 346. 93
37. 1
29. 2
40. 1
0. 0
62. 0
5. 1
38. 5
46. 1
46. 1
26. 8
62. 7
20. 1
72. 0
46. 2
2. 6
37. 7
41. 6
34. 1
38. 0
119, 118. 08 39. 5
789. 47 68. 7
3, 753. 17 2. 6
1 , 516. 09 60. 6
1, 110. 41- 211. 0
124, 066. 40 40. 4
55, 678. 83 32. 0
55.678. 83 32. 0
•
•
r
r
r
•
A
r
•
•
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1202 FINANCE ADMIN DEPT:
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1203 PERSONNEL DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4320 MEDICAL EXAMS
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT --LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT --MORE THAN $500
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
MGMT/SUPPORT
2, 063. 00
9, 472. 00
225. 00
2, 460. 00
1, 700. 00
9, 256. 00
25, 176. 00
400. 00
400. 00
315, 739. 00
MGMT/SUPPORT
53, 729. 00
1, 043. 00
I, 043. 00
3, 900 00
59, 715. 00
15, 480. 00
1 1 , 320. 00
26, 800. 00
900.00
5, 000. 00
710.00
3, 625. 00
I, 070. 00
22, 500. 00
2, 722. 00
36, 527 00
400 00
800.00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
150. 70
897. 62
50. 00
85. 00
97. 01
771. 00
2, 051. 33
0.00
0. 00
25, 205. 47
4, 451. 08
0. 00
541. 20
122. 50
5, 114. 78
1, 870. 41
0. 00
1, 870. 41
54
415
122
64
0
575
227
1,459
23
47
50
00
00
00
00
20
645. 00
4, 609. 94
145. 00
1, 042. 33
97. 01
3, 855. 29
10, 394. 57
110.76
110. 76
120, 923. 10
22,415.90
0. 00
541.20
199. 50
23. 156. 60
5, 199. 42
0. 00
5, 199. 42
300.19
1, 754. 26
597.50
767.00
517.00
2,050.92
1, 134. 79
7,921.66
0. 00 1 0 00
0 00 0. 00
PAGE 0005
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
151. 50
0. 00
151.50
0. 00
0. 00
O 00
O 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
O 00
O 00
1, 418. 00
4, 862. 06
80. 00
1, 417. 67
1, 602. 99
5, 400. 71
14, 781. 43
289. 24
289. 24
194, 815. 90
31, 313. 10
1, 043. 00
501. 80
3, 700. 50
36, 558. 40
10,129. 08
11,320. 00
21,449. 08
599.81
3, 245. 74
112. 50
2, 858. 00
553.00
19, 649. 08
1, 587 21
29, 605. 34
31. 2
48. 6
64. 4
42. 3
5. 7
41. 6
41. 2
27. 6
27.6
38. 2
41. 7
0. 0
51. 8
5. 1
38. 7
34. 5
0. 0
19. 9
33. 3
35. 0
84. 1
21. 1
48. 3
12. 6
41. 6
21. 6
390.00 2.5
BOO. 00 0. 0
-
0
•
r
r
r
r
•
•
A
r
r
C
r
r
•
•
^.
r
(-
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
5400 EQUIPMENT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0006
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
1, 200. 00 0. 00
124, 242. 00 8, 443. 39
1205 CABLE TV DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
25, 261. 00
489. 00
489. 00
2, 000. 00
28, 239. 00
1, 000. 00
1, 000. 00
700.00
1, 000. 00
600. 00
350. 00
500. 00
597.00
3, 747. 00
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 37,986.00
1206 DATA PROCESSING DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL.
83, 320. 00
300.00
1,650 00
1, 650. 00
86, 920. 00
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 107,416 00
1, 290. 60
0. 00
O. 00
232. 75
1, 523. 35
0. 00
0. 00
14. 07
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
50. 00
64.07
0. 00
0. 00
1, 587. 42
5, 935. 38
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
5, 935. 38
2, 635 33
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
10. 00 0. 00
36, 287. 69 151. 50
9, 313. 74
563. 93
0. 00
791. 00
10, 668. 67
3, 610. 00-
3, 610. 00-
1, 190. 00 0. 8
87, 802. 82 29. 3
0. 00 15, 947. 26 36. 8
0.00 74.93- 115.3
0. 00 489. 00 0.0
0. 00 1, 209. 00 39. 5
0. 00 17, 570. 33 37. 7
0. 00 4, 610. 00 361. 0
0. 00 4, 610. 00 361. 0
67. 64 0.00 632. 36 9.6
0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0
45. 00 0. 00 555.00 7. 5
85.00 0.00 265.00 24.2
437.00 0.00 63.00 87.4
249. 72 0. 00 347. 28 41.8
884. 36 0. 00 2, 962. 64 23. 6
0. 00 0. 00 5, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 5, 000. 00 0. 0
7, 943. 03
33, 125. 99
231 72
563.93
0.00
33, 921. 64
30, 090. 57
0. 00 30, 042. 97 20. 9
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
50, 194. 01
68. 28
1 , 086. 07
1 , 650. 00
52, 998. 36
77, 325. 43
39. 7
77. 2
34. 1
0. 0
39. 0
28. 0
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV ODJT DESCR
• 001 GENERAL FUND
1206 DATA PROCESSING
r'
r-
• •
•
•
r
r-
• •
•
r
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0007
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
107, 416. 00 2,635.33
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
30, 090. 57 0. 00
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE 3, 000.00 221.50 926.34
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 11, 348.00 532.65 1, 734. 12
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3,000.00 0.00 513.47
4315 MEMBERSHIP 670. 00 120.00 120.00
4316 TRAINING 3,300.00 0.00 2,518.77
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 850.00 395.00 395.00
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 2,677.00 223.00 1, 115. 10
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 24, 845. 00 1, 492. 15 7,322.80
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN 7500 0. 00 0.00 442.29
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN 3500 19, 518.00 0.00 1,965.82
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19, 518.00 0.00 2, 408. 11
DIVISION TOTAL 238, 699. 00 10, 062. 86 73,743. 12
1207 BUS LICENSE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
84, 206. 00
500.00
1, 664. 00
1, 664. 00
88, 034 00
52. 00
160.00
212.00
500.00
4, 000. 00
350.00
400 00
50.00
500 00
600 00
4, 046. 57
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
4, 046. 57
0. 00
37. 95
37. 95
28.26
224 93
27.37
4.00
O 00
O 00
0.00
20, 289. 10
0 00
0. 00
0. 00
20, 289. 10
26.78
37. 95
64 73
140.29
1, 538. 29
118 93
12 00
40 00
15.00
492 57
0. 00
1, 410. 07
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 410. 07
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 410. 07
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
46.86
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
77, 325. 43
2, 073. 66
8, 203. 81
2, 486. 53
550. 00
781. 23
455. 00
1, 561. 90
16, 112. 13
442. 29-
17, 552. 18
17, 109. 89
28. 0
30. 8
27. 7
17. 1
17. 9
76. 3
46. 4
41. 6
35. 1
0. 0
10. 0
12. 3
163, 545. 81 31. 4
63, 916. 90
500. 00
1, 664. 00
1, 664. 00
67, 744. 90
25. 22
122. 05
147.27
359.71
2, 414. 85
231.07
388.00
10. 00
485.00
107.43
24. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
23. 0
51. 5
23. 7
30.5
28. 0
39. 6
33. 9
3. 0
80. 0
3. 0
82. 0
C
r
r
•
•
n•
FINANCE-FA434 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0008
TIME 12:23:53 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC.BALANCE
001 GENERAL FUND
1207 BUS LICENSE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
5, 560. 00
11, 960. 00
463. 00
747. 56
100, 206. 00 4, 832. 08
1208 GEN APPROP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
21, 926. 00
469. 00
469. 00
22. 864. 00
21, 528. 00
21, 528. 00
250. 00
300. 00
250. 00
2, 135. 00
2, 935. 00
2,315.37
4,672.45
25, 026. 28
1, 910. 20 9, 409. 73
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
1, 910. 20 9, 409. 73
1,145.46 5,491.34
1,145.46 5,491.34
17. 64 127. 75
2, 650. 14- 21, 673. 02-
98. 00 98. 00
178.00 889.93
2, 356. 50- 20, 557. 34-
319. 00 0. 00
319. 00 0. 00
18, 156. 00
18,156 00
DIVISION TOTAL 65,802 00
1212 EMP BENEFITS DEPT. MGMT/ SUPPOR T
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
544, 529. 00
544, 529 00
1,502.96
1,502 96
2.202. 12
15, 940. 34
15, 940. 34
0. 00
46. 86
46. 96
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
318. 44 0. 00
318. 44 0. 00
7, 514. 80
7, 514. 00
2, 1 76. 97
186,865 70
186,865 70
0. 00
0 00
0 00
3, 244. 63
7, 240. 69
75, 132. 86
12, 516. 27
469. 00
469. 00
13, 454. 27
16, 036. 66
16, 036. 66
122. 25
21, 973. 02
152. 00
1, 245. 07
23, 492. 34
41.6
39. 4
25. 0
42. 9
0. 0
0. 0
41. 1
25. 5
25. 5
51. 1
7224. 3
39. 2
41. 6
700. 4
0. 56 99. 8
0. 56 99. 8
10, 641., 20
10, 641. 20
63, 625. 03
41. 3
41. 3
3. 3
0. 00 357, 663. 30 34. 3
0 00 357, 663. 30 34. 3
r
S
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
DIVISION TOTAL
1213 RETIREMENT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4180 RETIREMENT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPT:
1214 PROSP EXP DEPT:
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4322 UNCLASSIFIED
4397 2.3% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
544, 529. 00
MGMT/SUPPORT
808, 439. 00
808, 439 00
808, 439. 00
MGMT/SUPPORT
94, 336. 00
241, 620. 00-
147, 264. 00-
147, 264. 00 -
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4398 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR OUT
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2101 POLICE DEPT.
r✓ 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
• 4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
• 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME
4109 COURT TIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
1, 056, 506. 00
6, 881. 00
1 , 063, 387. 00
1,063,387.00
3, 278, 146 00
POLICE
500,237.00
1.564.037 00
17,280 00
7,500 00
90,000 00
20,500._00
41,547.00
41,547 00
43, 482 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
15, 940. 34
70, 128. 05
70, 128. 05
70, 128. 05
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
186, 865. 70
285, 928. 88
285, 928. 88
285, 928. 88
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 056, 505. 60
6, 91 4. 00
1 , 063, 419. 60
0.00 1,063,419.60
148, 921 95 1 , 850, 348. 43
36,657 87
123,410 59
1,490 00
4,325 74
7,761. 11
2,154 12
312.87
7,899 11
2,669 76
193,813 29
604,458 56
8,048 75
12,006 18
41,682 91
6,508 86
1,002 05
28,829 60
12,066 06
PAGE 0009
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
357, 663. 30
522, 510. 12
522, 510. 12
522, 510. 12
94, 356. 00
241, 620. 00-
147, 264. 00-
147, 264. 00-
34. 3
35.3
35. 3
35. 3
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 40 99. 9
33. 00- 100. 4
32. 60- 100. 0
32. 60- 100. 0
1 , 608. 43 1 , 426, 189. 14
0. 00
O 00
O 00
0. 00
0. 00
O 00
O 00
O 00
O 00
56. 4
306,423 71 38.7
959,578 44 38.6
9,231 25 46.5
4,506 18- 160.0
48,317 09 46.3
13,991 14 31.7
40,544 95 2.4
12, 71 7 40 69.3
31,415 94 27.7
•
r'
•
1
r
r
A
r •
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
2101 POLICE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: POLICE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4114 POLICE RESERVES
4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
4118 FIELD TRAINING OFFICER
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE
4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST
4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
•
2201 FIRE
DEP T
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
8, 500. 00
9, 318. 00
5, 000. 00
33, 825. 00
2, 382, 773. 00
91, 085. 00
37, 757. 00
128, 842. 00
22, 500. 00
32, 650. 00
6, 525. 00
1, 500. 00
8, 500. 00
17, 500. 00
21, 000. 00
17, 500. 00
8, 500. 00
1, 535. 00
10, 000. 00
4, 000 00
399, 182. 00
550, 892. 00
1, 537. 00
25, 000. 00
13, 025. 00
39, 562. 00
146,740 00
146,740 00
3, 248, 809 00
3, 248, 809 00
F IRE
38, 674 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
515. 00
553. 95
629. 80
4, 341. 58
192, 721. 50
2, 264. 10
102. 50
2,366.60
2, 065. 60
2, 335. 74
607. 19
138. 00
287. 47
1, 832. 46
2, 249. 88
1, 769. 73
559. 60
0. 00
397.46
105. 18
33, 265. 00
45. 613. 31
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2,306 07
2,306 07
10, 614. 62
2, 989. 44
3, 417. 84
17, 767. 64
943, 205. 80
35, 488. 03
11, 248. 95
46, 736. 98
9, 417. 50
16, 013. 62
2, 476. 04
1, 494. 89
1, 564. 01
10, 438. 28
4, 378. 87
12, 135. 04
3, 242. 15
422.50
9, 657. 17
1, 567. 38
166, 325. 20
239, 132. 65
326 74
2, 343. 00
11, 395. 00
14, 064. 74
112,430 77
112,430 77
243, 007. 48 1, 355, 570. 94
243, 007 48 1 , 355, 570 94
3, 037. 50 14, 397. 50
PAGE 0010
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
926. 55
926. 55
1, 243. 18
0. 00
1, 243. 18
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
432. 43
155. 00
0. 00
1, 228. 07
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 815. 50
0. 00
2, 371. 54
32, 500. 00
34, 871. 54
0 00
0 00
2, 114. 62-
6, 328. 56
1, 582. 16
15, 130. 81
1, 438, 640. 65
54, 353. 79
26, 508. 05
80, 861. 84
13, 082. 50
16, 636. 38
4, 048. 96
427. 32-
6, 780. 99
7, 061. 72
15, 393. 06
5, 364. 96
5, 257. 85
1, 112. 50
342. 83
2, 432. 62
232, 856. 80
309, 943. 85
1, 210. 26
20, 285. 46
30, B70. 00-
9, 374. 28-
34,309.23
8-
34,309.23
34, 309. 23
39, 856. 77 1, 854, 301. 29
38, 856. '77 1, 854, 381. 29
0. 00
124. 8
32. 0
68. 3
55. 2
39. 6
40. 3
29. 7
37. 2
41. 8
• 49. 0
37. 9
128. 4
20. 2
59. 6
26. 6
69. 3
38. 1
27. 5
96. 5
39. 1
41.6
43. 7
21. 2
18. 8
337. 0
123. 6
76. 6
76. 6
42. 9
42. 9
24, 276. 50 37. 2
•
•
r
r
r
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
2201 FIRE DEPT: FIRE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4108 FLSA OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
• DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
n 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
793, 541. 00
96, 000. 00
55, 000. 00
15, 871. 00
15, 871. 00
12, 840. 00
1, 027, 797. 00
20, 349. 00
20, 349. 00
3, 500. 00
3, 500. 00
7, 200. 00
3, 000. 00
3, 500. 00
650. 00
3. 800. 00
1, 900. 00
112, 787. 00
139, 837. 00
1, 225. 00
10, 157. 00
1 1 , 382. 00
138, 881. 00
138, 881. 00
1. 338. 246. 00
1,338,246.00
ANIMAL REGULTN
e9,291 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
71, 209. 93
4,932.49
4, 181. 95
0.00
876.28
0. 00
84, 238.15
554. BO
554. BO
381. 06
58. 89
453. 57
228.33
150.12
0. 00
0. 00
0.13-
9. 399. 00
10, 670. 84
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
47.62
47.62
95. 511. 41
95.511. 41
352, 295. 67
42, 648. 88
26, 125. 58
0. 00
9, 889. 66
2, 791. 15
448, 148. 44
11, 258. 29
11, 258. 29
1, 380. 01
1, 877. 76
1, 613. 60
1, 292. 30
392. 18
135. 00
769. 65
183. 13
46, 994. 91
54, 638. 54
715.15
0.00
715 15
42, 779. 00
42, 779. 00
557, 539. 42
557, 539 42
6,664 54 35,605 12
PAGE 0011
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
5, 544. 79
5, 544. 79
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
203. 04
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
203.04
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
5, 747. 83
5. '747. 83
0 00
441, 245. 33
53, 351.12
28, 874. 42
15, 871. 00
5,981.34
4,504.06
574, 103. 77
9, 090. 71
9, 090. 71
2, 119. 99
1, 622. 24
5, 383. 36
1, 707. 70
3, 107. 82
515. 00
3, 030. 35
1, 716. 87
65, 792. 09
84, 995. 42
44. 3
44. 4
47.3
0. 0
62. 3
64. 9
44. 1
55. 3
55. 3
39. 4
53. 6
25. 2
43. 0
11.2
20. 7
20. 2
9. 6
41.6
39. 2
509. 85 58. 3
10, 157. 00 0. 0
10, 666. 85 6. 2
96, 102. 00 30. 8
96, 102. 00 30. 8
774,958 75
774,'58 75
42. 0
42. 0
53, 6135. 88 39. 8
C
•
•
•
•
r
r
r
•
•
r-
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
2401 ANIMAL CONTROL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2701 CIVIL DEFENSE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 24,532.00
1, 000. 00
1, 770. 00
1, 770. 00
1, 000. 00
471. 00
95, 302. 00
1, 800. 00
5, 000. 00
6, 800. 00
450.00
1, 800. 00
700. 00
1, 400. 00
2, 500. 00
50.00
350.00
550.00
12, 469. 00
20, 269. 00
1, 000. 00
13, 000. 00
14, 000. 00
680.00
680.00
137, 051. 00
137, 051. 00
DEPT: DISASTER PREP
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
347. 20
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
18.76
7, 030. 50
475. 50
0.00
475.50
43. 38
246. 99
14. 47
143.83
60. 95
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 039. 00
1, 548. 62
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
56.15
56.15
9, 110. 77
9, 110 77
931. 91
563. 93
616. 00
5. 10
93.80
37, 815. 86
939. 05
1, 596. 80
2, 535. 85
212.43
1,120. 33
218. 43
479. 72
853.58
0. 00
0. 00
104.96
5, 195. 11
8, 184. 56
0. 00
13, 394. 89
13, 394. 89
280. 75
280.75
62,211. 91
62,211 91
2,273 68 10,529 14
PAGE 0012
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
291. 65
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
291. 65
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
291.65
291.65
0. 00
68. 09
1, 206. 07
1, 154. 00
994. 90
377. 20
57, 486. 14
860. 95
3, 403. 20
4, 264. 15
237. 57
679. 67
481. 57
920. 28
1, 354. 77
50. 00
350. 00
445. 04
7, 273. 89
11, 792. 79
1, 000. 00
394. 89-
605.11
399. 25
399.25
74, 547. 44
74, 547. 44
93. 1
31. 8
34. 8
0. 5
19. 9
39. 6
52. 1
31.9
37.2
47. 2
62. 2
31. 2
34. 2
45. 8
0. 0
0. 0
19. 0
41. 6
41. 8
0. 0
103. 0
95. 6
41.2
41.2
45. 6
45. 6
14.003.86 42.9
e.
r
r
r
r
•
•
r
r
r
•
•
A
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
2701 CIVIL DEFENSE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0013
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: DISASTER PREP
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3101 MEDIANS
491. 00
491. 00
231. 00
25, 745. 00
4, 648. 00
4, 648. 00
50.00
500. 00
200. 00
3, 600. 00
3, 484. 00
7, 834. 00
4, 500. 00
4, 500. 00
42, 727. 00
42, 727. 00
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
44, 697. 00
300.00
894.00
894.00
46, 785 00
47, 630. 00
1, 260. 00
48, 890. 00
25, 000 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0. 00
14. 58
2, 288. 26
0. 00
0. 00
72. 90
10, 601. 04
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00 491. 00 0. 0
0. 00 491. 00 0. 0
0. 00 158. 10 31. 5
0. 00 15, 143. 96 41. 1
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 648. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 648. 00 0. 0
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
646. 00
290. 00
936. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
646. 00
1, 450. 31
2, 096. 31
0. 00 50. 00 0. 0
0. 00 500. 00 0. 0
0. 00 200. 00 0.0
0. 00 2, 954. 00 17. 9
0. 00 2, 033. 69 41. 6
0. 00 5, 737. 69 26. 7
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 500. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 500. 00 0. 0
3,224.26 12, 697. 35
3,224.26 12, 697. 35
3, 814. 40
0. 00
0. 00
306.72
4, 121. 12
3, 150 00
0 00
3, 150 00
603.79
18, 745. 31
0. 00
0. 00
503.73
19, 249. 04
9, 450. 00
0. 00
9, 450 00
3, 593 58
0. 00 30, 029. 65 29. 7
0. 00 30, 029. 65 29. 7
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
25, 951.69 41.9
300. 00 0. 0
894. 00 0.0
390 27 56. 3
27, 535. 96 41. 1
38, 180. 00 19. 8
1 , 260. 00 0. 0
39, 440. 00 19. 3
21,406.42 14.3
c
•
•
r'
•
•
•
r
r
r
•
•
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV ODJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
3101 MEDIANS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0014
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
5, 000. 00
900. 00
720. 00
5. 701. 00
37, 321. 00
800. 00
800. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0. 79
0. 00
0. 00
604. 58
426. 00
149. 89
0. 00
1, 900. 07
6, 069. 54
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
133, 796. 00 7, 875. 70
3103 ST MAINTENANCE DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES '
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AU10 MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
142, 856. 00
500. 00
2, 848. 00
2, 848. 00
149, 052. 00
84, 877. 00
84, 877. 00
20. 000. 00
3. 500 00
13,000 00
600.00
68,841.00
105,941 00
150.00
150 00
20,044 00
20,844 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
1, 300. 37
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 300. 37
3, 273. 63
750. 11
720. 00
3, 800. 93
29, 951. 09
0. 00 B00. 00
0. 00 800. 00
34, 768. 58 1, 300. 37
11, 252. 20 54, 853. 21
0. 00 98. 90
0. 00 0. 00
1, 397. 17 1, 594. 18
12, 649. 37 56, 546. 29
8, 583. 88 25, 051. 78
8, 583. 88 25, 051. 78
1, 469. 36- 5,257.04
239.65 1,746.41
2, 550. 43 4. 535. 78
53.00- 299.00
5, 737. 00 28. 684. 75
9,943.44 40, 522. 98
0. 00 149. 05
0. 00 149. 05
1 . 736. 78
1, 736. 78
10, 420. 68
10, 420. b8
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3, 206. 72
0. 00
0. 00
3, 206. 72
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
0 00
34. 5
16. 6
0.0
33. 3
19. 7
0. 0
0. 0
97, 727. 05 26. 9
88, 002. 79 38. 3
401. 10 19. 7
2, 848. 00 0. 0
1, 253. 82 55. 9
92, 505. 71 37. 9
59, 825. 22 29. 5
59, 825. 22 29. 5
14, 742. 96 26. 2
1 , 753. 59 49.8
5, 257. 50 59. 5
301.00 49.8
40, 156.25 41.6
62, 21 1.30 41.2
0. 95 99. 3
0. 95 99. 3
10. 423. 32 49. 9
10, 423. 32 49.9
r
r
•
•
r
r
r
r
•
•
rb
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV QBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
DIVISION TOTAL
3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
360, 864. 00
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
97, 216. 00
500. 00
1, 927. 00
1, 927. 00
101, 570. 00
20, 000. 00
6, 500. 00
26, 500. 00
6, 000. 00
43. 000. 00
600. 00
1, 000. 00
150. 00
250.00
6, 781. 00
57, 781. 00
635. 00
1, 213. 00
2, 000. 00
0 00
3, 848. 00
1 1 , 000. 00
1 1 , 000. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 200,699.00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 695,359.00
4101 PLANNING DEPT' PLANNING
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
410L! REGULAR S/LARIES/MISC 191, 491.00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
32, 913. 47
7, 505. 52
11. 30
0. 00
755. 05
8, 271. 87
0. 00
613.11
613. 11
530. 72
4, 132. 38
114. 44
0. 00
20. 00
0. 00
1, 040. 00
5, 837. 54
291. 37
0.00
0. 00
505.34
796.71
841.29
841.29
16, 360. 52
57, 149. 69
132, 690. 78
35, 821. 02
117.35
0. 00
1, 272. 46
37, 210. 23
1, 962. 50
1, 904. 41
3, 866. 91
2, 198. 37
12, 464. 13
421. 51
255. 37
66. 25
0. 00
3, 300. 07
18, 705. 70
783. 24
0. 00
0. 00
4, 697. 17
5, 480. 41
5, 047. 74
5, 047. 74
70, 31 1 59
237, 770. 95
12, 121 14 67, 779. 83
PAGE 0015
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
3,206.72
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
5, 739. 29
5, 739. 29
0 00
0. 00
5, 739. 29
10, 246. 38
224, 966. 50
61, 394. 98
382. 65
1,927.00
654. 54
64,359. 17
18, 037. 50
4,595.59
22, 633. 09
3, 801. 63
30, 535. 87
178. 49
744.63
83. 75
250. 00
3, 480. 93
39, 075. 30
148. 24-
1, 213. 00
2, 000. 00
10, 436. 46-
7, 371. 70-
5,952.26
0-
5,952.26
5,952.26
124,648 12
447, 341. 67
37. 6
36. 8
23. 4
0.0
66. 0
36. 6
9.8
29. 2
14. 5
36. 6
28. 9
70. 2
25. 5
44. 1
0.0
48. 6
32. 3
123. 3
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
291.5
45. 8
45. 8
37. 8
35. 6
0. 00 123, 711. 17 35 3
r
•
•.
FINANCE-FA454
A TIME 12:23:53
r
•
•
A
r
r
r
r
•
•
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
4101 PLANNING
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0016
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PLANNING
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
700. 00
3, 749. 00
3, 749. 00
2, 210. 00
201, 899. 00
6, 218. 00
6, 218. 00
1, 600. 00
16, 265. 00
200. 00
500. 00
623. 00
2, 000. 00
1, 45o. 00
9, 464. 00
32, 102. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0. 00
1, 999. 44
412. 50
14, 533. 08
103. 14
0. 00
1, 999. 44
1, 532. 12
71, 414. 53
0. 00 251. 00
0. 00 251.00
101.47
584. 62
0. 00
63. 80
90. 00
B0. 00
0. 00
789. 00
1 , 698. 89
350. 00 0. 00
350. 00 0. 00
240, 569. 00 16, 231. 97
4102 PLANNING COMM DEPT: PLANNING
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOI-AL
5, 304. 00
5,304.00
4,600 00
454 00
1,200 00
6,454 00
637.50
637.50
356.76
0. 00
0. 00
356.76
11,758 00 994. 26
481. 56
4,119.70
69. 89
176. 36
200. 00
417. 50
0. 00
3,944.68
9,409.69
1 , 083. 1 1
1,083. 1 1
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1,367.00
o. bo
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 367. 00
0. 00
0. 00
82, 158. 33 1, 367. 00
2, 142. 00
2,142.00
1,422 77
12.49
0.00
1, 435. 26
3, 577. 26
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0 00
0. 00
0. 00
596. 96 14. 7
3, 749. 00 0. 0
1, 749. 56 53. 3
677. 88 69. 3
130, 484. 47 35. 3
5, 967. 00 4. 0
5, 967. 00 4. 0
1, 118.44 30.0
10, 778. 30 33. 7
130. 11 34. 9
323. 64 35. 2
423. 00 32. 1
1, 582. 50 20. 8
1, 450. 00 0. 0
5, 519. 32 41. 6
21, 325. 31 33. 5
733. 11- 309.4
733.11- 309.4
157, 043.67 34.7
3, 162. 00 40. 3
3, 162. 00 40. 3
3, 377. 23 29. 6
441.51 2.7
1,200.00 0. 0
5, 018. 74 22.2
8, 180. 74 30. 4
r
•
f
r
•
•
•
F I NANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23: 53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
4201 BUILDING
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0017
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
252, 327. 00 17, 226. 23
DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
225, 767. 00
200.00
4, 455. 00
4, 455. 00
234, 877. 00
47, 400. 00
700. 00
48, 100. 00
'2, 500. 00
6, 500. 00
1, 000. 00
1, 000. 00
1, 200. 00
645.00
3, 000. 00
1, 500. 00
17, 993. 00
35, 338. 00
1, 200. 00
10, 000. 00
11, 200. 00
17, 352. 43
14. 61
0. 00
0. 00
17, 367. 04
272. 02
0. 00
272. 02
167. 37
541. 88
0. 00
21. 02
19. 23
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 499. 00
2, 248. 50
45. 26
0. 00
45. 26
329, 515. 00 19, 932. 82
4202 PUD WKS ADMIN DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
155, 170. 00
2, 988. 00
2, 988. 00
5, 000. 00
7, 000 00
173, 146. 00
13, 285. 91
0. 00
730.50
140.58
508 68
14, 665. 67
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
85, 735. 59 1, 367. 00
83, 972. 35
14. 61
0. 00
0. 00
83, 986. 96
5, 171. 36
0. 00
5, 171. 36
762. 24
2, 584. 12
0. 00
207. 99
169. 46
75. 00
766. 00
0. 00
7, 495. 43
12, 060. 24
864. 68
0. 00
864. 68
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
10, 652. 90
0. 00
10, 652. 90
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
102,083.24 10,652.90
62, 066. 30
0. 00
1,415.31
1, 891. 44
2, 298 05
67, 671. 10
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
165, 224. 41 34. 5
141, 794. 65 37. 1
185. 39 7. 3
4, 455. 00 0. 0
4, 455. 00 0. 0
150, 890. 04 35. 7
31, 575. 74 33. 3
700. 00 0. 0
32, 275. 74 32. 8
1, 737. 76 30. 4
3, 915. 88 39. 7
1, 000. 00 0. 0
792. 01 20. 7
1, 030. 54 14. 1
570. 00 11. 6
2, 234. 00 25. 5
1, 500. 00 0. 0
10, 497. 57 41. 6
23, 277. 76 34. 1
335. 32 72. 0
10, 000. 00 0. 0
10, 335. 32 7. 7
216, 778. 86 34. 2
93, 103. 70
2, 988. 00
1, 572. 69
3, 108. 56
4, 701. 95
105, 474. 90
39. 9
0. 0
47. 3
37. 8
32. 8
39. 0
•
r
r-
• •
•
•
r-
• •
•
n
r
FINANCE-FA434
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
4202 PUB WKS ADMIN
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
9, 600. 00
9, 600. 00
5, 200. 00
9, 500. 00
0. 00
800. 00
800. 00
650.00
2, 900. 00
1, 400. 00-
47, 823. 00
66, 273. 00
1, 550. 00
2, 000. 00
3, 550. 00
252, 569. 00
4204 BLDG MAINT DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
145, 015. 00
2, 000 00
2, 892. 00
2, 892 00
0. 00
300. 00
153, 099. 00
17, 860 00
17, 860. 00
80, 000. 00
45, 000 00
1, 000 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0.00
309. 03
579. 86
123. 09
78. 18
123. 49
414. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3, 985. 00
5, 612. 65
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
20, 278. 32
12,174 60
252.25
0 00
1,886 50
0. 00
16.68
14,330 03
1,405.00
1,405.00
6,634.69
2, 61 0 51
45. 85
218. 12
218. 12
1, 584. 05
3, 461. 41
889. 14
424. 00
316. 14
669. 00
114. 00
0. 00
19, 925. 21
27, 382. 95
307. 52
0. 00
307. 52
95, 579. 69
58, 087. 94
453. 37
0. 00
2, 408. 69
2, 317. 50
83.40
63, 350. 90
4, 541. 27
4, 541. 27
30, 111. 94
8, 585. 64
310. 05
PAGE 0018
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
214. 39
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
214. 39
232. 48
0. 00
232. 49
446. 87
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
5, 036. 04
0. 00
9, 381. 88
9, 381. 88
3, 615. 95
6, 038. 59
1, 103. 53-
376. 00
483. 86
19. 00-
2, 786. 00
1, 400. 00-
27, 897. 79
38, 675. 66
1, 010. 00
2, 000. 00
3, 010. 00
156, 542. 44
2. 2
2. 2
30. 4
36. 4
0.0
53. 0
39. 5
102. 9
3.9
0.0
41. 6
.41.6
34. 8
0.0
15.2
38.0
86, 927. 06 40. 0
1, 546. 63 22. 6
2, 892. 00 0. 0
483. 31 83. 2
2, 31 7. 50- 0. 0
216. 60 27. 8
89, 748. 10 41. 3
13, 318. 73 25. 4
13, 318. 73 25. 4
49, 888. 06 37. 6
31, 378. 32 30. 2
689. 95 31. 0
•
• FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
e FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
•
•
A
r
r
r
•
•
A
r
001 GENERAL FUND
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
4204 BLDG MAINT DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
4321 BUILDING SAFETY/SECURITY
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1, 200. 00
500. 00
9, 500. 00
26, 224. 00
163, 424. 00
475. 00
475. 00
334, 858. 00
4205 EQUIP SERVICE DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
101, 281. 00
200.00
2,017.00
2, 017. 00
0. 00
105, 515. 00
4, 700. 00
1, 500. 00
3, 000. 00
200.00
8.311.00
17, 711. 00
2, 000. 00
2, 000. 00
5, 800. 00
9, 800. 00
5, 016. 00
5, 016. 00
138, 042. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
33. 87
0. 00
559. 91
2, 185. 00
12, 069. 83
0. 00
0. 00
27, 804. 86
63. 21
0. 00
1, 149. 67
10, 925. 31
51, 145. 82
234. 25
234. 25
119, 272. 24
7, 512. 35 37, 263. 91
629. 89 1, 104. 52
0. 00 0. 00
628. 59 736. 05
341. 64 6, 291. 87
9, 112. 47 45, 396. 35
1, 322. 62 1, 751. 42
57. 68 392. 20
215. 84 1, 254. 47
0. 00 0. 00
693. 00 3.464. 61
2, 289. 14 6, 862. 70
1, 267. 36 1 , 267. 36
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0 00
1, 267. 36 1, 267 36
417.96 2,507.76
417.96 2,507 76
13, 086 93 56, 034. 17
PAGE 0019
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
5, 036. 04
0. 00
0. 00
5, 036. 04
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
O 00
O 00
O 00
0. 00
1, 136. 79
500. 00
8, 350. 33
15, 298. 69
107, 242. 14
240. 75
240. 75
210, 549. 72
64, 017. 09
904. 52-
2, 017. 00
1, 280. 95
6, 291. 87-
60, 118. 65
2, 948. 58
1, 107. 80
1, 745. 53
200. 00
4, 846. 39
10, 848. 30
732. 64
2, 000. 00
5, 800. 00
8, 532. 64
2, 508. 24
2, 508. 24
5. 2
0. 0
12. 1
41. 6
34. 3
49. 3
49. 3
37. 1
36. 7
552. 2
0. 0
36. 4
0. 0
43. 0
37. 2
26. 1
41.8
0. 0
41. 6
38. 7
63. 3
0. 0
0. 0
12. 9
49. 9
49. 9
82, 007. 83 40. 5
•.
•
r
•
•
r
r
r
r
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV ODJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
4601 COMM RESOURCES
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
1, 054, 984. 00
DEPT: COMM PROMOTION
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4302 ADVERTISING
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
ODJECI SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
6101 PARKS. DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
172, 998. 00
500. 00
3, 374. 00
3, 374. 00
50, 000. 00
230, 246. 00
81, 078. 00
81, 078. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
81, 102. 93
372, 969. 34
14, 376. 55 69, 592. 81
0. 00 104. 46
0. 00 0. 00
1, 253. 52 3, 809. 48
3, 989. 59 20, 967. 91
19, 619. 66 94, 474. 66
14, 320. 67 46, 173. 09
14, 320. 67 46, 173. 09
7, 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00
4, 000. 00 278. 02 1, 367. 27
12, 190. 00 382. 88 4, 422. 24
13. 890. 00 1 , 223. 47 1 , 701. 49
350. 00 17. 33 171. 69
100. 00 0. 00 0. 00
625 00 0. 00 20. 00
1, 000. 00 267 50 773. 99
1, 600. 00 0. 00 0. 00
17, 766. 00 1 , 481. 00 7, 404. 54
59, 021. 00 3, 650. 20 15, 861. 22
5, 000. 00
2, 500. 00
8, 000 00
15, 500. 00
2, 300. 00
2, 300. 00
388, 145 00
388, 145 00
PARKS/REC
72, 632. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
189.21
189.21
37, 779. 74
37, 779. 74
181. 00
0. 00
O. 00
181.00
946.05
946 05
157, 636. 02
157, 636. 02
5, 728. 80 27, 958. 80
PAGE 0020
DATE 12/13/89
41.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
16, 135. 81
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
97. 73
40. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
137. 73
2, 069. 39
0. 00
0. 00
2, 069. 39
O 00
O 00
2, 207. 12
2,207. 12
O 00
665, 878. 85
103, 405. 19
395. 54
3, 374. 00
435. 48-
29, 032. 09
135, 771. 34
34, 904. 91
34, 904. 91
7, 500. 00
2, 632. 73
7, 670. 03
12, 148. 51
178. 31
100. 00
605. 00
226. 01
1, 600. 00
10, 361. 46
43, 022. 05
2, 749. 61
2, 500. 00
8, 000. 00
13, 249. 61
1,353.95
1,353 95
228, 301. 86
228, 301. 86
36. 8
40. 2
20. 8
0. 0
112. 9
41. 9
41. 0
56. 9
56. 9
0. 0
34. 1
37. 0
12. 5
49. 0
0. 0
3. 2
77. 3
0. 0
41. 6
27. 1
45. 0
0. 0
0. 0
14. 5
41. 1
41. 1
41. 1
41. 1
44, 673. 20 38. 4
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12: 23: 53
e. FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
•
•
1
r
001 GENERAL FUND
6101 PARKS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0021
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PARKS/REC
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4304 TELEPHONE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN 3500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN 3500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8141 CIP 89-141
500. 00
1, 453. 00
1, 453. 00
76, 038. 00
157, 606. 00
12, 600. 00
170, 206. 00
21, 800. 00
125. 00
10, 800. 00
700. 00
1, 200. 00
300. 00
500. 00
10, 246. 00
45, 671. 00
1, 000. 00
1, 200. 00
2, 200. 00
4, 200. 00
4, 200. 00
298, 31 5. 00
298, 315. 00
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
125, 000. 00
125,000.00
125, 000. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
22. 64
0. 00
502. 70
6, 254. 14
16, 053. 62
0. 00
16, 053. 62
4, 835. 48
17. 22
751. 51
92. 49
2. 75
0. 00
53. 00-
854. 00
6, 500. 45
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
28, 808. 21
28. 808. 21
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
22. 64
0. 00
699. 71
28, 681. 15
36, 104. 86
0. 00
36, 104. 86
20, 165. 28
96. 50
4, 568. 70
241. 24
134. 40
488. 00
299. 00
4, 269. 84
30, 262. 96
223. 44
0. 00
223. 44
0. 00
0.00
95, 272. 41
95. 272. 41
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
4, 750. 00
0. 00
4, 750. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
4, 750. 00
4, 750. 00
0. 00
0. 00
477. 36
1, 453. 00
753. 29
47, 356. 85
116, 751. 14
12, 600. 00
129, 351. 14
1, 634. 72
28. 50
6, 231. 30
458. 76
1, 065. 60
188. 00-
201. 00
5, 976. 16
15, 408. 04
776. 56
1, 200. 00
1, 976. 56
4, 200. 00
4, 200. 00
198, 292. 59
198, 292. 59
125, 000. 00
125, 000. 00
0. 00 125, 000. 00
4. 5
0. 0
48. 1
37. 7
25. 9
0. 0
24. 0
92. 5
77. 2
42. 3
34. 4
11. 2
162. 6
59. 8
41. 6
66. 2
22. 3
0. 0
10. 1
0. 0
0. 0
33. 5
33. 5
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
r
•
•
•
r
•
•
FINANCE-FA434
TIME 12:23:33
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
8146 CIP 89-146
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0022
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
20, 000. 00
20, 000. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 20,000.00
8176 CIP 86-176 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
70, 468. 00
70, 468. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 70, 468. 00
8177 CIP 87-177 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/FRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
40, 000. 00
40, 000. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 40,000.00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8601 CIP 86-601
255,468.00
DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OGJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
4,000 00
4,000 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0.00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0.00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
O 00 0. 00 0. 00
O 00 0. 00 0. 00
200 00
200 00
4,000 00 200 00
8604 CIP 86-604 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
16,000 00
16,000 00
UIV101UN TOTAL 16,000 00
865.00 206.24
865 00 206 24
865.00 206.24
O 00 0. 00 0. 00
O 00 0.00 0 00
20, 000. 00
20, 000. 00
0. 0
0. 0
20, 000. 00 0. 0
70, 468. 00
70, 468. 00
0.0
0.0
70, 468. 00 0. 0
40, 000. 00
40, 000. 00
0.0
0. 0
40, 000. 00 0. 0
255, 468. 00 0. 0
2, 928. 76
2, 928. 76
26. 7
26. 7
2,928.76 26. 7
16,000 00
16,000 00
0. 0
0. 0
O 00 0 00 0 00 16,000 00 0 0
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ?
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) - PAGE 0023
• TIME 12:23:53 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
1 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Y.
r, 001 GENERAL FUND
8606 CIP 87-606 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
r 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 8, 550. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 8, 550. 00 0. 0
(, OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8, 550. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 8, 550. 00 0. 0
DIVISION TOTAL 8, 550. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 8, 550. 00 0. 0
8609 CIP 89-609 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
r 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 30, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 0
• OBJECT SUBTOTAL 30, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 0
• DIVISION TOTAL 30, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 0
8610 CIP 88-610 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 13, 905. 00 0. 00 2, 236. 50 0. 00 11, 668. 50 16. 0
✓ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 13, 905. 00 0. 00 2, 236. 50 0. 00 11, 668. 50 16. 0
DIVISION TOTAL 13, 905. 00 O. 00 2, 236. 50 O. 00 11, 668. 50 16. 0
8612 CIP 88-612 DEPT: BLDGS 1' GROUNDS
r 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 16, 700. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 16, 700. 00 0. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16, 700. 00 0. 00 0 00 0. 00 16, 700. 00 0. 0
DIVISION TOTAL 16, 700. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 16, 700. 00 0. 0
8613 CIP 89-613 DEPT: BLDGS E. GROUNDS
• 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 8,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.0
41OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8, 000. 00 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 8, 000. 00 0. 0
r DIVISION TOTAL_ 8, 000 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 8, 000. 00 0. 0
8614 CIP 28-614 DEPT. BLDGS E. GROUNDS
r
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
136, 074 00 9, 715 71
96, 643. 89 0. 00
39, 430. 11 71. 0
c
•
.1
r
•
•
•
r
•.
•
r-
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND). PAGE 0024
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION
001 GENERAL FUND
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
136, 074. 00 9, 715. 71
136, 074. 00 9, 715. 71
8615 CIP 89-615 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8703 CIP 89-703
49, 988. 00
49, 988. 00
49, 988. 00
283, 217. 00
DEPT: OTHER PROJECTS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
1 1 , 678, 527. 00
96, 643. 89
96, 643. 89
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
9, 915. 71 99, 745. 39
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
757, 619 45
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
5, 003, 061. 51
0. 00
206. 24
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
83, 203. 31
39, 430. 11 71. 0
39, 430. 11 71. 0
49, 988. 00
49, 988. 00
0. 0
0.0
49, 988. 00 0. 0
183, 265. 37 35. 2
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
6, 592, 262. 18
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
43. 5
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) PAGE 0025
A.
TIME 12:23:33 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
r FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
r 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 12,278. 00 1,022.92 5,114.60 0. 00 7, 163. 40 41.6
r OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12, 270.00 1,022.92 5,114.60 0.00 7,163.40 41.6
DIVISION TOTAL 12, 278. 00 1, 022. 92 5, 114. 60 O. 00 7,163.40 41.6
r
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 12, 278.00 1,022.92 5,114.60 0.00 7,163.40 41.6
2601 STREET LIGHTING DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
S 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 77,099 00 6, 208. 12 30, 303. 41 0. 00 46, 795. 59 39. 3
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,000 00 11.30 11.30 0.00 988. 70 1.1
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1,533 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 1, 533. 00 O. 0
✓ 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,533 00 707.41 1,224.02 O. 00 308. 18 79.8
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4,000 00 0.00 915.00 0. 00 3, 085. 00 22. 8
4180 RETIREMENT 9,699 00 1,032.06 3,594.31 0, 00 6, 104. 69 37. 0
✓ 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8,932 00 159. 16 3, 007. 18 0. 00 5, 924. 82 33. 6
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 103,796 00 8, 118. 85 39, 056. 02 O. 00 64, 739. 98 37. 6
i 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 14, 300.00 0.00 6,000.00 0. 00 8, 300. 00 41. 9
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 9, 350. 00 613. 10 1, 904. 39 0. 00 7, 445. 61 20. 3
✓ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 23, 650.00 613 10 7,904.39 0.00 15, 745.61 33.4
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
✓ 4303 UTILITIES 170, 000.00 29,019 40 58,173 87 0. 00 111, 826.13 34.2
4304 TELEPHONE 150.00 0.00 85.36 0.00 64.64 56.9
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 10, 200.00 357.46 1,909 88 2,969 22 5,320.90 47.8
✓ 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 2,500 00 213.97 1,642.99 0.00 857.01 65.7
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 9,500.00 151.08 657 48 607 15 8,235.37 13.3
4316 TRAINING 500.00 0 00 50.00 0.00 450.00 10.0
✓ 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 9, 222 00 768 50 3,842 50 0 00 5,379. 50 41. 6
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 202,072.00 30,510.41 66,362.08 3,576.37 132,133.55 34.6
5400 EQUIPMENT
5403 VEHICLES 2,000 00 0 00 0 00 0. 00 2,000.00 0. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,000 00 0.00 0 00 0 00 2,000.00 0.0
r
DIVISION TOTAL 331,518 00 39, 242.36 113,322 49 3,576 37 214,.619.14 35.2
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 331,519 00 39,242 36 113,322 49 3,576 37 214, 619. 14 35.2
i
C
•>
•..
S FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
r•
•
r
r
•
•
(%
FUND DIV ODJT DESCR
105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
8201 CIP 85-201
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0026
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
30, 000. 00
30, 000. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
30, 000. 00 0. 00
8202 CIP 85-202 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 16,500.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16,500.00
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EOUIPMENT
5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 825. 00
0. 00 825. 00
0. 00 0. 00 814. 94
0. 00 0. 00 814. 94
0. 00 0.00 340. 80
0. 00 0. 00 340. 80
16, 500 00
46, 500. 00
390, 296. 00
0. 00
0. 00
40, 265. 28
1 , 980. 74
1 , 980. 74
120, 417. 83
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3, 576. 37
30, 000. 00
30, 000. 00
30, 000. 00
15, 675. 00
15, 675. 00
814. 94-
814. 94-
340. 80-
340. 80-
14, 519. 26
44, 519. 26
266, 301. 80
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
5. 0
5. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
12. 0
4.2
31.7
•
•
•
r-
•
•
c
r.
•
•
1
r ..
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0027
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION
110 PARKING FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1, 373, 022.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 373, 022.00
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3301 VEH PKG DIST
1, 373, 022. 00
1, 373, 022. 00
DEPT: PKG FACILITIES
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
5420 DEPRECIATION/EQUIP&VEH
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS
5620 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS&IMPRV
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
3302 PARKING ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
16, 667. 00
312. 00
312. 00
4, 006. 00
746. 00
22, 043. 00
44, 361. 00
44, 361. 00
250. 00
300. 00
1, 000. 00
1, 028. 00
2, 578 00
0. 00
0. 00
350.00
350.00
2, 700 00
2, 700. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
114,416.67
114, 416. 67
114, 416.67
114, 416.67
286. 80
0. 00
0. 00
217. 38
6. 11
510. 29
7,906.63
7,906.63
10. 00
19. 20
0. 00
85. 65
114 85
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
72, 032. 00 0, 531. 77
DEPT: PKG FACILITIES
554,849. 00 44,392.34
572, 083. 35
572, 083. 35
572, 083. 35
572, 083. 35
5, 436. 39
751. 89
0. 00
807. 17
315. 91
7, 311. 36
16, 846. 52
16, 846. 52
40. 00
99. 10
978. 74
428. 25
1, 546. 09
10.00
0. 00
0. 00
10.00
0. 00
0. 00
25, 713. 97
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
489.37
0. 00
489.37
0 00
0. 00
489.37
216, 442. 10 0 00
800, 938. 65
800, 938. 65
800. 938. 65
41. 6
41. 6
41. 6
800, 938. 65 41. 6
1 1, 230. 61
439. 89-
312. 00
3, 198. 83
430. 09
14,.731. 64
27, 514. 48
27, 514. 40
210. 00
200. 90
21. 26
599. 75
1, 031. 91
10.00-
489.37-
350.00
149.37-
2, 700. 00
2, 700. 00
45, 028. 66
32. 6
240. 9
0.0
20. 1
42. 3
33. 1
37. 9
37. 9
16. 0
33. 0
97. 8
41. 6
59. 9
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
142. 6
0. 0
0. 0
36. 3
338, 406. 90 39. 0
r"
r
•
r
r
•
A
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12: 23: 53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
110 PARKING FUND
3302 PARKING ENF
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0028
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PKG FACILITIES
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
4180 RETIREMENT
4187 UNIFORMS
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
5420 DEPRECIATION/EOUIPR,VEH
5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
12, 000. 00
11, 065. 00
11, 065. 00
49, 160. 00
5, 350. 00
71, 756. 00
8, 000. 00
84, 028. 00
807, 273. 00
11, 000. 00
11, 000. 00
3, 000. 00
45, 000. 00
3, 378. 00
15, 000. 00
8, 000. 00
12, 000. 00
300. 00
2, 000. 00
1, 000. 00
49, 589. 00
139, 267. 00
1, 589. 00
53, 500. 00
20, 000. 00
30, 100. 00
105, 189. 00
3, 500. 00
3, 500. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
1, 001. 14
0. 00
775. 36
2, 161. 50
338. 51
5, 460. 36
878. 63
850. 89
55, 858. 73
175. 00
175. 00
274. 96
814. 91
O. 00
786.49
397. 37
473. 36
O. 00
191. 76
O. 00
4, 132. 40
7, 071. 25
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
114.00
114.00
1, 066, 229. 00 63, 218. 90
1 , 1 38, 261. 00 71, 750. 75
4, 259. 47
1, 281. 50
2, 450. 98
19, 703. 15
1, 850. 92
20, 959. 65
1, 549. 79
17, 983. 19
286, 480. 75
1, 994. 14
1, 994. 14
1. 200. 85
11, 548. 71
1, 222. 00
5, 021. 25
3, 580. 09
2, 243. 78
0. 00
456. 76
78. 00
20, 662. 00
46, 013. 44
611. 69
1, 651. 39
0. 00
0. 00
2, 263. 08
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 453. 41
0. 00
1, 082. 53
0. 00
99. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3, 634. 94
0. 00
489.37
0. 00
0. 00
489.37
570. 00 0. 00
570. 00 0. 00
337, 321. 41 4, 124. 31
363, 035. 3B 4, 613. 68
7, 740. 53
9, 783. 50
8, 614. 02
29, 456. 85
3, 499. 08
50, 796. 35
6, 450. 21
66, 044. 81
520, 792. 25
9, 005. 86
9, 005. 86
1, 799. 15
33, 451. 29
2, 156. 00
7, 525. 34
4, 419. 91
8, 673. 69
300. 00
1, 444. 24
922. 00
28, 927. 00
89, 618. 62
977. 31
51, 359. 24
20, 000. 00
30, 100. 00
102, 436. 55
2, 930. 00
2, 930 00
35. 4
11. 5
22. 1
40. 0
34. 5
29. 2
19. 3
21. 4
35. 4
18. 1
18. 1
40. 0
25. 6
36. 1
49. 8
44. 7
27. 7
O. 0
27. 7
7. 8
41. 6
35. 6
38. 4
4. 0
0. 0
0. 0
2. 6
16. 2
16. 2
724, 783. 20 32. 0
770, 61 1 . 94 32.2 '
• •I
r
•
t
r
F
r
r'
•
1
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:33
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
110 PARKING FUND
8148 CIP 89-148
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0029
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8701 CIP 89-701
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
DEPT: OTHER PROJECTS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
2, 526, 283. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
186, 167. 42
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
935, 118. 73
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
4, 613. 68
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
1, 586, 550. 59
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
37. 1
C.
•
I/ FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
•
•
•
r
r
r
r
r
•
•
A
r
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
115 STATE GAS TAX FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0030
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 47, 272. 00 3,939.33 19, 696. 65
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 47, 272. 00 3,939.33 19, 696. 65
DIVISION TOTAL 47,272. 00 3,939.33 19, 696. 65
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 47, 272.00 3,939.33 19, 696.65
8150 CIP 89-150 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 15, 000.00 0.00 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15, 000.00 0.00 0.00
DIVISION TOTAL 15, 000.00 0.00 0.00
8160 CIP 65-160 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 79,493.00 . 0.00 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 79, 493. 00 0.00 0.00
DIVISION TOTAL 79, 493.00 0.00 0.00
8170 CIP 87-170 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 337,219.00 0.00 136.32
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 337,219.00 0.00 136.32
1
DIVISION TOTAL 337, 21 9.00 0.00 136 32
8171 CIP 87-171 DEPT STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 21,305.00 0.00 136.32
OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 21,305.00 0.00 136.32
DIVISION TOTAL 21,305.00 0.00 136.32
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
27, 575. 35
27, 575. 35
41.6
41. 6
27, 575.35 41.6
27, 575.35 41.6
15, 000. 00
15, 000. 00
0.0
0. 0
15, 000. 00 0. 0
79, 493. 00
79, 493. 00
0. 0
0. 0
79, 493. 00 0. 0
337, 082. 68
337, 082. 68
0.0
0. 0
0. 00 337, 082. 68 0. 0
0.00
0. 00
0 00
21,168. 68
21,168. 68
0.6
0. 6
21, 168. 68 0. 6
r
0
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
IITIME
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0031
TIME 12:23:53 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
r FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
115 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND
8171 CIP 87-171 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
r 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
r DEPARTMENT TOTAL 453, 017.00 0.00 272.64 0.00 452, 744.36 0.0
FUND TOTAL 500, 289.00 3,939.33 19, 969.29 0.00 480, 319.71 3.9
r-
0 •
I
•
•
f I FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
r
•
•
r-
• •
•
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0032
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
53, 000. 00
53. 000. 00
53, 000. 00
53, 000. 00
53, 000. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
4, 000. 00
4, 000. 00
4, 000. 00
4, 000. 00
4, 000. 00
25, 000. 00
25, 000. 00
25, 000. 00
25, 000. 00
25, 000. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
28, 000. 00
28, 000. 00
28, 000. 00
28, 000. 00
28, 000. 00
47. 1
47.1
47. 1
47. 1
47. 1
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
t
, i FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0033
TIME 12:23:53 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
r 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 5,000.00 416. 67 2,083.35 0. 00 2,916.65 41. 6
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5,000.00 416.67 2,083.35 0.00 2,916.65 41.6
DIVISION TOTAL 5,000.00 416.67 2,083.35 0.00 2,916.65 41.6
r
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 5,000.00 416.67 2,083.35 0.00 2,916.65 41.6
G 8506 CIP 86-506 DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
41 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 31, 570. 00 O. 00 O. 00 0. 00 31, 570. 00 0. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 31, 570. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 31, 570. 00 O. 0
Ir 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 1,140.61 3,686.70 4,827.31- 0.0
r OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 1, 140. 61 3,686.70 4,827.31- 0. 0
r DIVISION TOTAL 31, 570. 00 0. 00 1, 140. 61 3,686.70 26, 742. 69 15. 2
8508 CIP 87-508 DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 55,000.00 0.00 8,663. 00 0.00 46,337 00 15.7
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 55,000. 00 0. 00 0,663 00 0.00 46, 337. 00 15. 7
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
r 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0.00 2,116.77 2,379.29 0.00 2,379.29- 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 2, 116. 77 2,379.29 0. 00 2,379.29- 0. 0
DIVISION TOTAL 55, 000. 00 2, 1 1 6 77 11,042 29 0. 00 43, 957. 71 20. 0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 86, 570. 00 2, 116 77 12,182 90 3, 686. 70 70,700 40 18.3
FUND TOTAL 91, 570. 00 2, 533. 44 14, 266. 25 3, 686. 70 73,617 05 19 6
•
•
FINANCE-FA454 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Ir EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
TIME 12:23:53 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 PAGE 0034
DATE 12/13/89
r 41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION
• MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC
BALANCE
126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
15, 000. 00
15, 000. 00
f^ DIVISION TOTAL 15, 000.00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 15,000.00
• 8514 CIP 89-514 DEPT: PARKS
•
tt
r -
r
•
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5500 LAND
5501 LAND
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
110, 000. 00
110, 000. 00
110, 000. 00
110, 000. 00
125, 000 00
15, 000. 00
15, 000. 00
15, 000. 00
15, 000. 00
110, 000. 00
110, 000. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00 100. 0
0. 00 100. 0
0. CO 100. 0
0. 00 100. 0
0. 00 110, 000. 00- 0. 0
0. 00 110, 000. 00- 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
110, 000. 00
110, 000. 00
125, 000. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
110, 000. 00
110, 000. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 0
0. 0
100. 0
100. 0
100. 0
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0035
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION
127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1,354,771.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 354, 771. 00
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
1, 354, 771. 00
1, 354, 771. 00
1, 354, 771. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
112, 897. 58
112, 897. 58
112, 697. 58
112, 897. 58
112, 897. 5B
564, 487. 90
564, 487. 90
564, 487. 90
564, 487. 90
564, 487. 90
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
790, 283. 10
790, 283. 10
790, 283. 10
790, 283. 10
790, 283. 10
41. 6
41.6
41.6
41. 6
41.6
A
r
•
•
r
r
•
•
r
i
/
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12: 23: 53
FUND DIV ODJT DESCR
140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GR
4701 HOUSING REHAB
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0036.
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0/.. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: OTHER
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 92, 072. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 92, 072. 00 0. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 92, 072. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 92, 072. 00 0. 0
DIVISION TOTAL 92, 072. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 92, 072. 00 0. 0
4702 PUBLIC SVC PROG DEPT: OTHER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 7, 670. 00 550. 00 1, 450. 00 0. 00 6, 220. 00 18. 9
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 670. 00 550. 00 1, 450. 00 0. 00 6, 220. 00 18. 9
DIVIOrnN TOTAL 7, 670. 00 550. 00 I, 450. 00 O. 00 6, 220. 00 18. 9
4703 CDBG ADMIN DEPT: OTHER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 12, 276. 00 756. 15 3, 850. 08 0. 00 8, 425. 92 31. 3
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12. 276. 00 756. 15 3, 8850. 08 0. 00 8, 425. 92 31. 3
D I V I S I Ci,. TOTAL 12, 276. 00 756 15 3, 650. O8 0. 00 8, 425. 92 31. 3
4704 S B. FREE CLINIC 1iri:'T OTHER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4,200 00 0.00 0 00 0.00 4,200.00 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4,200 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,200.00 O.0
DIVISION TOTAL 4, 200 00 0. 00 u C0 0 00 4, 200. 00 0. 0
4705 JUVENILE DIVSN DEPT OTHER
420` ZuNTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT E VICE/PRIVATE 3,000 00 J. 00 0 00 0 00 3,000 00 U. 0
Oi3JECT 8013IOTAI_ 3, 000 00 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 000 Cv 0 0
DIVISION TOTAL 3, 000 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 3, 000. 00 0. 0
4706 5 13 CURL .._.VE DEPT. OTHER
1200 corn RACT sCRVICES
01 CON TR:',!:'I Scl•:VICE/PRIVATE 1,000 00 252 68 252 68 0 00 747 32 225.2
A
A
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0037
TIME 12:23:53 FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/09 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
i FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
r 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GR
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 000. 00 252. 68 252. 68 O. 00 747. 32 25. 2
r
DIVISION TOTAL 1, 000. 00 252. 68 252. 68 O. 00 747. 32 25. 2
r 4707 1736 FAM CR CTR DEPT: OTHER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
r4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 2, 544. 00 0. 00 2, 544. 00 O. 00 O. 00 100. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 544. 00 O. 00 2, 544. 00 O. 00 0. 00 100. 0
0
DIVISION TOTAL 2, 544. 00 O. 00 2, 544. 00 O. 00 O. 00 100. 0
II DEPARTMENT TOTAL 122, 762. 00 1, 558. 83 8, 096. 76 0. 00 114, 665. 24 6. 5
A FUND TOTAL 122, 762. 00 1, 558. 83 8, 096. 76 0. 00 114, 665. 24 6. 5
r -
i
r
0
0
C
r
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
EXPENDITURE CITYSUMOF HERMOSA BEACH
FROM 11/01/89 REPORT (BY FUND)
TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1.00
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3401 DIAL A RIDE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4396 TRSFR OUT --INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL_
1 . 00
1. 00
1.00
DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
DIVISION TOTAL
3402 COMMUTER BUS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4180 RETIREMENT
4108 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
UBJECT SUBIOr,11
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL.
4300 MATERIALSlSUPPLIES/OTHER
TRSFR OUT --INS USER CHCS
14, 958. 00
1, 888. 00
1, 439. 00
18, 285. 00
136, 094 00
136, 094. 00
50 00
500 00
87 CO
637 CO
155,016 CO
DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
5. 403 00
681 00
54^> 00
6, 633 00
49, 000 00
49, 000 00
56 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1,334.22
156. 47
14. 88
1, 505. 57
0. 00
0. 00
4 16
0. 00
7 29
11.45
1,517 02
458 64'
56 08
5 11
519 83
3,376 23
3,376.23
4. 64
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
6, 404. 75
643. 87
209. 20
7. 257. 82
0. 00
0. 00
16.64
0 00
36 45
53.09
7,310 91
2, 266. 24
233 68
85 45
2, 5E15. 37
7, 528. 98
7, 528. 98
23.20
PAGE 0038
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
Y.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
• 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
0. 00
O 00
O 00
O 00
0. 00
O 00
O 00
O 00
O 00
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
1. 00 0. 0
1.00 0.0
1. 00 0. 0
1. 00 0 0
e, 553. 25
1, 244. 13
1, 229. 80
11, 027. 18
136, 094. 00
136, 094. 00
33.36
500 CO
50.55
583. 91
42. 8
34. 1
14. 5
39. 6
0. 0
0. 0
33. 2
0. 0
41 8
8. 3
147, 705. 09
4. 7
3,136 76
447 32
463.55
4,047 63
41, 471. 02
41, 471. 02
41. 9
34. 3
15. 5
38. 9
15. 3
15. 3
32.80 41.4
c
•
c
•
•
•
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0039
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
56. 00 4. 64
55, 689. 00 3. 900. 70
3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 1,664.00
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 0.00
4130 RETIREMENT 216.00
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 149.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,029.00
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
12, 773. 00
12, 773. 00
1, 110. 00
1, 110. 00
56. 32
0. 00
18.31
2. 89
77. 52
839. 00
839. 00
92. 53
92. 53
15,912.00 1,009.05
3406 CIRC ELEMENT DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 17,735. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17,735 00
DIVISION TOTAL 17,735 00
• DEPARTMENT TOTAL 244, 352_. 00
8149 CIP 90-149 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
•
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
55, 000. 00
55, 000. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 55,000 00
DEPARTMENT UO UAL 55,000 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
23. 20 0. 00
10, 137. 55 0. 00
154. 46
0. 61
68. 60
54. 41
278.08
1, 987. 00
1, 987. 00
462. 65
462. 65
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 727. 73 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0.00
6, 426 77
0.00
0. 00
O 00
O 00
0. 00
20,176 19
O 00
O 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
O 00
O 00
O 00
O 00
O 00
32. 80 41. 4
45, 551.45 18.2
1, 509. 54
0. 61-
147. 40
94. 59
1, 750. 92
10, 786. 00
10, 786. 00
647. 35
647.35
9. 2
0. 0
31. 7
36. 5
13. 7
15. 5
15. 5
41. 6
41. 6
13, 184. 27 17. 1
17, 735. 00
17, 735. 00
17, 735. 00
0. 0
0. 0
0.0
224,175.81 8.2
55, 000. 00
55, 000. 00
0. 0
0. 0
55, 000. 00 0. 0
55, 000 00 0 0
•
•.
•
FINANCE-FA434
TIME 12:23:33
FUND DIV OI3JT DESCR
143 GRANT FUND
8149 CIP 90-149
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
FUND TOTAL
r'
•
•
r-
• •
•
n
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0040
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
299, 353. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
6,426.77
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
20, 176. 19 0. 00
279, 176. 81 6. 7
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV ODJT DESCR
150 GRANT FUND
8102 CIP 85-102
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 PAGE 0041
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 188, 051.00 24, 999. 37
188,051.00 45,360. 93 0.00 142,690.07
24, 999. 37
45,360. 93 24 1
0. 00 142, 690. 07 24.1
DIVISION TOTAL 186, 051. 00
24, 999.37 45,360 93
8137 CIF 85-137 0.00 142,690.07 24.1
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 554, 400. 00 0.00 0 00
554,400.00 0.00 0.00 554,400.00 0.0
O 00 0.00 954, 400. 00
0.0
DIVISION TOTAL 554,400.00
0.00 0.00 0. 00
554,400.00 0 0
8151 CIP 89-151
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 45,500.00 0 00
45.500. 00 O 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0. 00 45, 500. 00
0 0
• 45,500. 00 0 0
DIVISION TOTAL 45,500.00
0.00 0 00
DEPARTMENT 0 00 45'500 00 0 0
TOTAL
787.951.00 24,999 37
45,360 93
8512 CIP 89-512 O 00 742.590 07 5 7
DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECSUBTOTAL 60,000 00 0 00
60,000 00 0 O0 0 00 60,000 00
O 00 0 00 O 00 0 0
60,000 00 0 0
DIVISION TOTAL 60,000 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
8516 CIP 89-5I6 60.000 00 0 0
DEPT PARKS
5400 EQUIPMENT
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7,958.00 0 00 0 00
7.958 00 0 00 0 00 7,958 00 0 0
O 00 0 00 7.958 00
0 0
DIVISION rorgi- 7, v;,e 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
7,959 CO 0 0
1
.`
'1
1
O
• :
• it
r
•
•
A
r
r
r
r
r-
•
•
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
150 GRANT FUND
8517 CIP 89-517
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) PAGE 0042
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PARKS
5400 EQUIPMENT
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
8, 742. 00
8, 742. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 8,742.00
8518 CIP 89-518 DEPT: PARKS
5400 EQUIPMENT
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
12, 305. 00
12, 305. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 12, 305.00
8519 CIP 89-519 DEPT: PARKS
5400 EQUIPMENT
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
2, 108. 00
2, 108. 00
2, 108. 00
91, 113.00
879, 064. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
24, 999. 37 45, 360. 93
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
8, 742. 00
8, 742. 00
8, 742. 00
12, 305. 00
12, 305. 00
12, 305. 00
2, 108. 00
2, 108. 00
2, 108. 00
91, 113. 00
833, 703. 07
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
5. 1
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12: 23: 53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
155 CROSSING GUARD FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0043
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 4, 500. 00 375. 00 1, 875. 00 0. 00 2, 625. 00 41. 6
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4, 500. 00 375. 00 1, 375. 00 0. 00 2, 625. 00 41. 6
DIVISION TOTAL 4, 500. 00 375. 00 1, 875. 00 0. 00 2, 625. CO 41. 6
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4, 500. 00 375. 00 1, 875. 00 0. 00 2, 625. 00 41. 6
• 2102 CROSSING GUARD DEPT: POLICE
414100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 12, 145. 00 739. 00 4, 649. 88 0. 00 7, 495. 12 38. 2
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 0. 00 15. 24 15. 24 0.00 15.24- 0. 0
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 238. 00 0. 00 187. 98 0. 00 50. 02 '78. 9
A 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 238. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 238. 00 0. 0
4113 CROSSING GUARDS 33, 321. 00 3, 214. 76 9, 060. 36 0. 00 25, 260. 64 24. 1
r„ 4180 RETIREMENT 2, 765. 00 149. 17 538. 85 0. 00 2, 226. 15 19. 4
4187 UNIFORMS 1, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 876. 00 20. 13 331. 07 0. 00 544. 93 37. 7
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 50, 583. 00 4, 138. 30 13, 793. 38 0. 00 36, 799. 62 27. 2
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES .
r 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 8, 400. 00 0 00 2, 000. 00 0. 00 6, 400. 00 23. 8
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0, 900. 00 0. 00 2, 000. 00 0. 00 6, 900. 00 22. 4
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 2,172 00 181.00 905 01 0.00 1,266.99 41.6
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 172 00 181 00 905 01 0. 00 1, 266. 99 41. 6
• DIVISION TOTAL 61, 655 00 4, 319. 30 16, 688. 39 0. 00 44, 966. 61 27. 0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 61, 655 00 4, 319. 30 16, 688 39 0 00 44, 966. 61 27. 0
• FUND TOTAL 66, 155 00 4, 694. 30 18, 563 39 0. 00 47, 591. 61 28. 0
r
•
f
•
•
r
r
•
1
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
160 SEWER FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN
3, 292. 00
3, 292. 00
3,292.00
3,292.00
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8405 LIP d6-405
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 174,80e. 00
94, 753. 00
1, 500. 00
1, 078. 00
1, 878. 00
11, 361. 00
8, 923. 00
120, 293. 00
2, 700. 00
2, 050. 00
5, 550. 00
900
7,500
1,000
1,125
300
33, 734
44, 559
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
9, 070. 00
9, 070 00
179, 472. 00
179, 472. 00
DEPT: SANITARY SEWER
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
274. 17
274. 17
274.17
274. 17
7, 108. 50
214. 13
0.00
1,037.22
1,042.49
137. 26
9,539.60
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
30.04
81.46
66 89
1 716 21
0 00
2,811 00
4,713 60
740 32
748 32
15,001 52
15, 001 52
1, 370. 85
1, 370. 05
1, 370. 85
1, 370. 05
33, 866. 18
742. 62
0. 00
2.328.98
3,825.68
2,539.66
43, 303. 12
662. 42
0. 00
662. 42
181.23
3, 072. 85
339.28
1 , 784. 69
0. 00
14, 055. 13
19, 433. 18
4, 489. 92
4, 489. 92
67, 888. 64
67,138e. 64
0. 00 1 51 , 283. 75
PAGE 0044
DATE 12/13/89
41.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
•
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3,662 42
0. 00
150.97
0. 00
0 00
3,813 39
0.00
0 00
3, 81 3. 39
3, 013. 39
0. 00
1, 921. 15
1, 921. 15
1,921.15
1,921.15
60, 886. 82
757. 38
1, 878. 00
450. 98-
7, 535. 32
6, 363. 34
76, 909. GO
2, 037. 58
2, 050. 00
4, 887. 58
718
764
660
810
300
19,678
21,312
77
73
72
66-
00
87
43
4, 580. 08
4, 580. 08
107, 769. 97
107, 769. 97
41.6
41.6
41.6
41. 6
35. 7
49. 5
0. 0
124. 0
33. 6
28. 4
35. 9
24. 5
0.0
11.9
20. 1
89.8
33. 9
172. 0
0. 0
41.6
52. 1
49. 5
49. 5
39. 9
39.9
23, 524. 25 196.5
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 12:23:53
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
160 SEWER FUND
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
i'
41
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0045
FROM 11/01/89 TO 11/30/89 DATE 12/13/89
41.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
174, 808. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 174, 808.00
8406 CIP 88-406 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
2, 200, 592. 00
2, 200, 592. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 2, 200, 592.00
41 8407 CIP 88-407 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
•
25, 000. 00
25, 000. 00
25, 000. 00
2, 400, 400. 00
2, 583, 164. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00 151, 283. 75
0. 00 151, 283. 75
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
15, 275. 69
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
151,151.283 75
220, 543. 24
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
23, 524. 25
23, 524. 25
2, 200, 592. 00
2. 200, 592. 00
0. 00 2, 200, 592. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3, 813. 39
25. 000. 00
25, 000. 00
25, 000. 00
2, 249, 116. 25
2. 358, 807. 37
86. 5
86. 5
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
6. 3
8. 6
Honorable Mayor
and Members of the
City Council
January 9, 1990
City Council Meeting
of January 23, 1990
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE
PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH
Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the
month of December 1989.
Respectfully submitted,
Gary Brutsc
City Treasurer
NOTED:
/1-11/
Kevin Northcrafti
City Manager
if
INVESTMENT REPORT - DECEMBER 1989
INSTITUTION TOTAL DATE OF INVESTMENT DATE OF MATURITY INTEREST
LAIF
BALANCE 12/01/89 $1,060,000.00
Investment 300,000.00 12/12/89
Investment 1,000,000.00 12/19/89
Investment 250,000.00 12/22/89
Investment 300,000.00 12/27/89
BALANCE 12/31/89
LACPIF
BALANCE 12/01/89
Withdrawal
BALANCE 12/31/89
$2,910,000.00 8.771%
$3,644,363.76
(1,355,706.46)
12/20/89
2,288,657.30 10.48%
SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST
U.S. Treasury Note 24,634.28 9/27/89 3/1/90
U.S. Treasury Note 500,000.00, 9/27/89 8/15/94
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT:
Union Federal S&L
Investment $ 500,000.00
City National Bank
Investment $ 500,000.00
3/7/89 3/7/90
3/30/89 3/23/90
7.8%
8.3%
9.50%
10.30%
FHLMC:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Investment $ 248,733.64
TOTAL BALANCE $10,485,235.66
Respectfully Submitted,
U/I
Gary Bruts
City Treasurer
3/26/87
3/1/17 8.0%
City National Bank
Investment
City National Bank
Investment
CORPORATE NOTES:
Ford Motor Credit Co.
Investment
Merrill Lynch & Co.
Investment
$ 500,000.00
$ 500,000.00
$ 500,000.00
$ 500,000.00
4/25/89 4/25/90
5/22/89 5/17/90
5/19/88
6/30/88
10.00%
9.45%
5/20/93 9.10%
1/2/90 8.35%
U.S. TREASURY NOTE:
Investment $ 500,937.94 2/22/89 1/31/91 9.20%
Investment $ 505,551.17 3/13/89 3/31/90 9.45%
Investment $ 506,721.33 3/21/89 3/31/90 9.61%
January 17, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 23, 1990
(CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 9, 1990 MEETING)
SUBJECT: OIL PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR),
TEXT AMENDMENT, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT (CUP) AND LEASE AGREEMENT
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL
PURPOSE: SCHEDULE FOR PROCESSING ABOVE NOTED DOCUMENTS
Recommendation
Adopt attached schedule.
Background
At the November 14, 1989 meeting, the City Council approved
staff's recommended process for completion of the above noted
documents, and requested that a public workshop hearing be
included.
At the January 9, 1990 meeting, the City Council requested legal
advice regarding a public hearing workshop. Staff has revised
the wording of the schedule according to the attached City
Attorney's memorandum.
Analysis
The staff has prepared a schedule which generally follows the
recommended process. However, it was slightly modified to
coincide with the first quarter General Plan amendments. for 1990.
The schedule has been reviewed and found acceptable to the School
District and Macpherson Oil Company.
Attachments
1. Schedule
2. City Council Minutes of 11-14-89 meeting
3. Letter from City Attorney
CONCUR:
Kevin B. NorthcraEt
City Manager
p/ccsrsche
1
Respectfully submi, ted4
Michail chubach
Planning Director
REVISED
January 17, 1990
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE FOR CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT (E.I.R.); ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND TEXT
AMENDMENT; AND APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P,) AND
LEASE AGREEMENT.
Between January 17 and February 5th -- Final Draft E.I.R made
available to public for minimum 30 day review ending March 6,
1990.
March 6th -- Planning Commission to consider certification of the
E.I.R and add any necessary conditions including noting further
analysis and public review if ultimately either of the two
alternative City Yard sites are chosen. Planning Commission
holds public hearing for General Plan amendment and text
amendment.
March 15th -- City Council and School District hold joint noticed
public hearing as a workshop meeting with consultant and staff.
Due to the number of issues to be considered, it is anticipated
that no public testimony would be taken at this time. The public
hearing would then be continued to April 10th to hear public
testimony.
April 10th -- City and School District hold joint public hearing
to certify E.I.R; City Council holds public hearing on necessary
General Plan and text amendments.
Early April -- Start finalizing negotiations on final
arrangements with school district and Macpherson Oil, based on
E.I.R. information.
Late May -- Based on the final plan decisions and E.I.R.,
Planning Commission approves C.U.P.
Late June -- City Council approves lease agreement, and confirms
C.U.P. approval by Planning Commission.
p/certeir
11.
RECOMMENDATION FOR REVIEW OF PRECESSING OF OIL ENVIRON-
MENTAL IMPACE REPORT AND OTHER OIL RELATED PROPOSED
ACTIONS. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated November 7, 1989. Supplemental memo from
Michael Schubach dated November 14, 1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
Action: To approve staff recommendations as follows:
(1) To provide three (3) week public review and hold
final public hearing on only the EIR before the Planning
Commission as soon as staff can prepare reports and then
send to the City Council for a joint City Council/School
- 3 -
ci
Minutes 11-14-89
District/MacPherson Oil public hearing at the next
available City Council meeting.
(2) Hold General Plan amendment and text amendments at
a public hearing before the Planning Commission and then
at the next available City Council meeting.
(3) Based on final plan and EIR, approve CUP and lease
agreement at a publicly noticed date.
And an additional item: (4) To hold an additional Public
Hearing with MacPherson Oil Company, the Hermosa Beach
School District and the City.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
Minutes 11-14-89
THOMAS W. STOEVER
WILLIAM B. BARR
CHARLES S. VOSE
CONNIE COOKE,/SANDIFER
ROGER W. SPRINGER
EDWARD W. LEE
HERIBERTO F. DIAZ
JAMES DUFF MURPHY
JANICE R. MIYAHIRA
LAW OFFICES
OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1000 SUNSET BOULEVARD
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
(2131 250-3043
January 16, 1990
Mr. Michael Schubach
Planning Director
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
TELECO PIER
(2131 482-5336
A,M 1 6 1990
Re: Oil Production EIR - Schedule for Processing
Dear Mr. Schubach:
At the January 9, 1990 meeting, the City Council continued
the above item for clarification of the proposed March 15, 1990
public hearing. In reviewing the comments of the council -
members, I recommend that the tentative schedule be revised by
restating the purpose of the March 15th hearing in the
following manner:
"March 15 - City Council and school
district hold joint noticed public hearing
as a workshop meeting with consultant and
staff. Due to the number of issues to be
considered, it is anticipated that no
public testimony would be taken at this
time. The public hearing would then be
continued to April 10th to hear public
testimony."
With this clarification, I believe that the tentative
schedule can be resubmitted to the City Council for adoption.
Should you have further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Very truly yours,
Charles S. Vose
OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE
CSV:ilf
cc: Kevin Northcraft, City Manager
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
IA 16SOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT
THE MODIFICATIONS, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS AS NOTED BELOW TO THE
4REVISED CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING ELEMENT OF THE
!' GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on December
12, 1989 and January 9, 1990 to receive oral and written
testimony and made the following Findings:
A. The said document is a state mandated General Plan Element;
B. The document revises the current Circulation Element;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa
Beach, California, does hereby adopt the following modifications,
deletions and additions (note: Page numbers correspond to the
subject document) to the Circulation, Transportation and Parking
Element of the General Plan prepared by DKS Associates, June,
1989:
Circulation
1. Eliminate recommendation to implement parking restriction on
Pacific Coast Highway southbound during peak commute hours.
(P. 32-33)
2. Eliminate turn restrictions onto residential streets from
Pacific Coast Highway during peak commute hours
recommendation. (P. 33)
3. Eliminate widening of eastbound/westbound approaches at
Prospect Avenue/Artesia Boulevard. (P.33)
4. Eliminate signalize following intersections recommendation:
1. Gould Avenue/Valley Drive/Ardmore Avenue
2. Pier Avenue/Valley Drive/Ardmore Avenue
3. Ardmore Avenue/21st Street
4. Hermosa Avenue/8th Street
5. Manhattan Avenue/27th Street/Greenwich Village
5. Eliminate removing street parking along east side of Ardmore
Avenue for 80 feet prior to side streets - 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th
and 7th recommendation. (P. 37)
6. Eliminate widening of Ardmore Avenue from Pier Avenue to 1st
Street. (P. 37)
7. Eliminate reclassifying the following streets from local to
collector based on traffic volume:
1. Valley Drive (Pier Avenue to north border)
2. Ardmore Avenue (Pier Avenue to 2nd Street)
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. Highland Avenue (Longfellow Avenue to north border)
4. Longfellow Avenue(Ardmore Avenue to Manhattan Avenue)
8. Eliminate recommendation to cul-de-sac 4th Street just west
of Ardmore Avenue and eliminate connecting 5th Street to 3rd
Street west of Ardmore Avenue as an alternative for parking
on Ardmore Avenue (see figure 12). (P. 38)
9. Eliminate one-waying of streets in general. (P. 38)
10. Add Gould Avenue to be changed from collector to local street
designation.
11. Eliminate bike path along the greenbelt recommendation.
(P. 58)
12. Eliminate creating limited truck routes along the following:
1. Gould Avenue (Pacific Coast Highway to Morningside Drive)
2. 27th Street (Morningside Drive to Greenwich Village)
3. Hermosa Avenue (Greenwich Village to Pier Avenue)
4. Manhattan Avenue north City limit to 27th Street
13,. Modify recommendation concerning parking structure as
follows:
Providing a parking structure downtown to enhance business
possibly on northwest corner Pier Avenue/Manhattan Avenue;
possibly trade land to obtain site. (P. 71)
14. Delete providing residential parking structures in some
neighborhoods recommendation. (P. 70)
15. Change title "non-residential" to "commercial". (P. 71)
16. Add studying traffic intrusion on Monterey Boulevard /
two-way traffic on Valley Drive between 2nd Street and
Herondo Street in future.
17. Add studying angle parking on Hermosa Avenue to improve
parking and create bicycle lane in future.
In addition the recommendation by the Planning Commission to
prohibit left turns onto Prospect Avenue south bound at
Aviation Boulevard during peak traffic hours is eliminated.
/ &Ain , /
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
1990.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
A(//;n.24?
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
p/ccrscirc
2
January 16, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 23, 1990
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO ADOPT CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION, AND
PARKING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
PURPOSE: TO REVISE GENERAL PLAN
Recommendation
Adopt attached resolution.
Background
at the City Council meeting of January 9, 1990, the City Council
approved the revised noted document with amendments.
Analysis
Please find attached a resolution adopting the above noted
document subject to modifications, deletions and additions as
stated.
CONCUR:
Michael Sc u•ac
evin B. North a t Planning Director
City Manager
a/ccsrpark
CITY MANAGER COMMENT:
A clarification of the Council's intent in classifying high volume
streets as local residential is appropriate to avoid misinterpreta-
tions.
It is doubtful that Council's intent is to encourage an increase in
traffic on other residential streets, which could be caused by
reducing volumes on the relevant sections of Valley, Ardmore,
Highland, Longfellow and Gould.
To avoid such a misinterpretation, it is recommended that language
be added to the Element that local, residential streets include
those streets predominantly residential in terms of adjacent
property use, and are intended to retain a residential character.
Higher speeds and increasing traffic volumes are to be discouraged
on such streets. (p. 17-18).
1
lg
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT
THE REVISED CIRCULATION TRANSPORTATION, AND PARKING ELEMENT OF
THE GENERAL PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS, ADDITIONS AND
DELETIONS AS NOTED BELOW.
WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on December
12, 1989 and January 9, 1990 to receive oral and written
testimony and made the following Findings:
A. The said document is a state mandated General Plan Element;
B. The document revises the current Circulation Element;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa
Beach, California, does hereby adopt the Circulation,
Transportation and Parking Element of the General Plan prepared
by DKS Associates, June, 1989, subject to the following
modifications, deletions and additions (note: Page numbers
correspond to the subject document):
Circulation
1. Eliminate recommendation to implement parking restriction on
Pacific Coast Highway southbound during peak commute hours.
(P. 32-33)
2. Eliminate turn restrictions onto residential streets from
Pacific Coast Highway during peak commute hours
recommendation. (P. 33)
3. Eliminate widening of eastbound/westbound approaches at
Prospect Avenue/Artesia Boulevard. (P.33)
4. Eliminate signalize following intersections recommendation:
1. Gould Avenue/Valley Drive/Ardmore Avenue
2. Pier Avenue/Valley Drive/Ardmore Avenue
3. Ardmore Avenue/21st Street
4. Hermosa Avenue/8th Street
5. Manhattan Avenue/27th Street/Greenwich Village
5. Eliminate removing street parking along east side of Ardmore
Avenue for 80 feet prior to side streets - 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th
and 7th recommendation. (P. 37)
6. Eliminate widening of Ardmore Avenue from Pier Avenue to 1st
Street. (P. 37)
7. Eliminate reclassifying the following streets from local to
collector based on traffic volume:
1. Valley Drive (Pier Avenue to north border)
2. Ardmore Avenue (Pier Avenue to 2nd Street)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9—
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. Highland Avenue (Longfellow Avenue to north border)
4. Longfellow Avenue(Ardmore Avenue to Manhattan Avenue)
8. Eliminate recommendation to cul-de-sac 4th Street just west
of Ardmore Avenue and to connect 5th Street to 3rd Street
west of Ardmore Avenue as an alternative for parking on
Ardmore Avenue (see figure 12). (P. 38)
9. Eliminate one-waying of streets in general. (P. 38)
10. Add Gould Avenue to be changed from collector to local street
designation.
11. Eliminate bike path along the greenbelt recommendation.
(P. 58)
12. Eliminate creating limited truck routes along the following:
1. Gould Avenue (Pacific Coast Highway to Morningside Drive)
2. 27-th Street (Morningside Drive to Greenwich Village) -
3. Hermosa Avenue (Greenwich Village to Pier Avenue)
4. Manhattan Avenue north City limit to 27th Street
13. Modify recommendation concerning parking structure as
follows:
Providing a parking structure downtown to enhance business
possibly on northwest corner Pier Avenue/Manhattan Avenue;
possibly trade land to obtain site. (P. 71)
14. Delete providing residential parking structures in some
neighborhoods recommendation. (P. 70)
15. Change title "non-residential" to "commercial". (P. 71)
16. Add studying traffic intrusion on Monterey Boulevard /
two-way traffic on Valley Drive between 2nd Street and
Herondo Street in future.
17. Add studying angle parking on Hermosa Avenue to improve
parking and create bicycle lane in future.
In addition the recommendation by the Planning Commission to
prohibit left turns onto Prospect Avenue south bound at
Aviation Boulevard during peak traffic hours is eliminated.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
1990.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
,1. vne
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
2
p/ccrscirc
Jim Lissner
2715 El Oeste
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
(213) 376-4626
January 13, 1990
The City Council
City Hall
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Honorable Councilmembers:
JAN 18 1990
Thank you VERY MUCH for changing the classification of Gould
_so that the speed limit can be reduced. You definitely made
our day in this neighborhood.
I don't know if it's too late to include it in the
Circulation Element, but I would like to ask you to
reconsider adding "two left turns." I know that Mr. Antich
said that it would be impossible to do, because part of the
intersection is in Manhattan, but we believe that it is
possible and we would like to keep working on it. Inclusion
of "two left turns" in the Circulation Element is important
for the following reasons.
1. When we approach Caltrans and other
agencies about the project, they ask us whether we
have the support of the City Council. Your action
to add "two left turns" in the Circulation Element
will indicate that support.
2. By including "two left turns" in the
Circulation Element at this time, "two left turns"
will go through the required environmental review
along with the rest of the Element, and should not
need a separate, and costly, enviromental review
if, in the near future, we are able to convince
Caltrans and Manhattan to go along with the
installation.
I would also like to comment about your denial of the
attempt to "collectorize" the south end of Ardmore and the
north end of Valley. I agree with your decision, and I
assume that your desire was to stop these streets from being
surveyed up to higher speed limits. Since they have been,
and will remain, local streets, we would expect that the
speed limit presently posted would be 25. But it isn't.
They are posted at 30 and 35 mph. They were surveyed up to
these speed limits as the result of mistakenly being
included in the list of streets requiring surveying, back in
1978 when_ surveying first started. Unfortunately, even
SUPPLEMENTAL 1 g
INFORMATION
though they were surveyed by mistake, the higher speed
limits became official when the 1978 City Council accepted
the citywide survey. See Vehicle Code Section 22357.
If you would prefer that a lower limit, such as 25, was
posted on those "local" sections of Valley and Ardmore, I
believe that Section 22358 would permit you to bring the
limits down. Unlike the rules for collector streets (Secs.
627 and 40802) which do not provide for consideration of the
effect the traffic has on the neighborhood, Section 22358
allows the Council to use its judgement as to what is a
"reasonable" speed limit for a local street and the
neighborhood through which it runs. Thus, while the traffic
engineer may recommend 35 since he is allowed to consider
only what is in the best interest of the cars and their
drivers, the Council can choose a lower limit because they
are allowed (on a local street) to also consider what is
best for the neighborhood.
If you have any questions about the effect of "two left
turns" upon traffic flow and safety, or about the method for
reducing the limits on north Valley and south Ardmore,
please call me, and I will attept to provide the information
you require.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 4, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Manager Kevin B. Northcraf "I/
RE: Circulation Element Review and Approval - Procedural
Suggestions
*****************************************************************
Suggested Steps for Approval of the Circulation Element
1) Staff introduction of the consultant.
2) Consultant's presentation and responses to questions raised
at first public hearing.
3) Questions of consultant from Council.
4) Open public hearing and accept new public testimony.
5) Close public hearing.
6) Review of recommendations as listed on the matrix and straw
votes on each item as well as any added by Councilmembers.
7) Motion to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the
.Circulation Element and reflecting the majority votes in the
straw votes on matrix items, for approval at the January 23
meeting as a consent calendar item.
8) Take a break or refer to agenda.
Criteria for determining if an item should be included or
excluded from the Circulation Element
Since the element is a planning document, inclusion of an item
would not mean that the item is approved; only that it merits
further study. Excluding the item would mean that it does not
merit further study. For example, the Planning Commission has
recommended that one-way streets be excluded from the element.
Staff feels there may be cases in the next ten years that resi-
dents will ask for a consideration of one-way streets in their
area. By leaving the item in the Circulation Element, this could
be considered on request of residents without it requiring a -
General Plan change to the Circulation Element. If the item is
omitted from the element, any consideration of one-way streets
would require an amendment to the Circulation Element of the
General Plan.
- 1 -
Corrections
Errors pointed out in the attached memos will be resolved with
the consultant prior to printing the final draft of the element
and do not require separate action by the Council to resolve.
Responses to Council Inquiries
A check list of the input received from Councilmembers Sheldon
and Midstokke was made by staff, and all responses are included
in packet information with three exceptions:
1) Gould Avenue "merge paranoia" - Traffic speed is not direct-
ly a circulation element issue. Staff feels that the west-
erly bound traffic on Gould at PCH probably is somewhat af-
fected by the need to merge towards the bottom of the hill.
Widening it obviously would solve this problem but appears
to be a rather drastic solution. Our Public Safety Director
reports that the radar/traffic unit that has been working
the area appears to have an effect in reducing speeds. We
will be testing to confirm that information.
2) Impact of second left turn off Artesia Boulevard at PCH -
The consultant is expected to respond orally at the meeting.
3) Barricade at Ardmore & Herondo - The consultant is expected
to respond orally at the meeting. Also refer to attached
memo from Michael Schubach responding to inquiries by Coun-
cilmember Midstokke. /
January 2, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 9, 1990
SUBJECT:
CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING ELEMENT
LOCATION: CITY-WIDE
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL
PURPOSE: REVISIONS TO CURRENT GENERAL PLAN
Recommendation
Staff has examined -the recommendations by the consultant, DKS,and
the Planning Commission, and has provided in matrix format a
general staff recommendation for each issue; refer to attached
Exhibit A. In addition, staff recommends that any corrective
work be completed as noted in several attached memos. Staff will
work with the consultant to make all corrections.
Background
At the City Council meeting of December 12, 1989,
Council held a public hearing, and took public
regarding the proposed revision to the General Plan.
More background regarding this General Plan revision is
Exhibit B, and the staff reports to the City Council and
Commission.
the City
testimony
found in
Planning
Analysis
As noted at the City Council meeting of December 12th, staff is
generally pleased with the document, except for the necessary
corrective work.
The issues which have resulted from this effort either through
the consultants recommendations, public input, or Planning
Commission recommendations, have been stated in Exhibit A.
The consultants will be providing a presentation at the January
9th meeting, and will also be responding to questions which were
asked at the last meeting and any new questions.
No resolution has been prepared at this time. Once the City
Council has rendered its decision on all the various issues, and
noted any modifications, additions, and/or changes desired, staff
will prepare a resolution, and the consultants based on the
resolution will prepare the final document. A copy of the final
document will be provided to each Councilmember.
Attachments
1. Exhibit A
2. Exhibit B
3. Exhibit C
3. City Council staff report of 12-12-89
5. Planning Commission staff report of 11-21-89
6. Staff memorandums
7. Correspondence
CONCUR:
'Kevin B. ort craft
City Manager
p/ccsrcirc
Respectfully submiLted
1 � ,
Michael 'Schu.ach
Planning Director
tXhibiT -A-
PG.
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION +'
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF
DKS
32
Eliminate parking lane and add
southbound lane along PCH 2D
during peak hour traffic
Recommend approval
No consensus-C.M.& P
W. Dir: desire emer-
gency & high occu-
pancy vehicles only
Recommend
approval
33
Add "no left turn" signs as Tte,
determined appropriate by,
staff along PCH to improve �'
traffic flow.
Recommend approval
Recommend approval
1
Recommend
approval
33
Widening of eastbound/westbound itit,
approaches at Prospect/Artesia «,o
to provide additional capacity.
Recommend denial
Recommend against
error in data from
consultant, no need
to widen.
Level of
Service
E or D
34
Signalize following intersections:
1. Gould/Valley/Ardmore %LD
2. Pier/Valley/Ardmore ‘.b
3. Ardmore/21st St.
4. Hermosa/8th St.
5. Manhattan/27th/Greenwich
Village
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
37
Eliminate street parking along --)7A
eastside of Ardmore for 80 feetre)
Prior to side streets - 3rd, 4th
5th, 6th and 7th for safety sake
Recommend against
Should be consider-
ed for safety
reasons while limit-
ing parking loss, if
street not widened.
support
parking
removal
37
Study widening of Ardmore from
Pier Ave. to 2nd St in near
future, and from 2nd to 1st St. Y -'
after the completion of recently
approved development
Recommend approval
Recommend approval
(Note: Widening
would impact the
Greenbelt)
Recommend
approval
37
Reclassify the following streets ,„ ,
from
from local to collector based on
traffic volume:
1. Valley Dr.(Pier to north border)
2. Ardmore Ave.(Pier to 2nd St.)
3. Highland (Longfellow to north
border)
4. Longfellow (Ardmore to Manhattan
Ave.)
,----
Approve
Approve
Approve
Approve
Approve
Approve
Approve
,,---,,,----) /..-e
► '- ; z`
Approve
Approve ei
Approve 3--oz-Approve
Approve
1
--Continued EXHIBIT "A"
PG.
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF
DKS
38
Cul-de-sac 4th St. just west of -X0
Ardmore; connect 5th St. to 3rd 54
St. west of Ardmore as alternative
(see figure 12) parking for Ardmore
eastside
Recommend against
Recommend against
Figure 12
should be
retitled as
an alterna-
tive
38
One-waying of streets in general
6--45
Recommend against
Recm'd approval only
with the provision
that it is desired
by neighborhood and
a survey conducted
Approve
where
warranted
and accepted
Gould Ave. changed from collector
to local street designation �
Recommend against
and speed should
stay 35 mph
Recm'd against & no
speed should be in-
cluded in document
Recommend
against
Prohibit left hand turn at peak
traffic hour onto Prospect south - _once
bound from Aviation Blvd. s d
Study this issue
parking lane on
PCH is converted to
traffic lane during
peek hours to see
if problems persist
Concur with Planning
Commission but study
issue only if park-
ing lane is convert -
ed to traffic lane.
Concur with
Planning
Commission
58
Bike path along the greenbelt —WA
6=-6
Recommend against
No consensus among
staff, but do agree
to study more bike
routes in City. A
paved bike path is
inconsistent with
passive nature of
the greenbelt
Greenbelt is
best loca-
tion for
bike path
61
Create limited truck routes along
the following: ���0
1. Gould Ave (PCH to Morningside) `1 Recommend against
2. 27th ST. (Morningside to Green- Recommend against
wich Village.
3. Hermosa Ave. (Greenwich Village Recommend against
to Pier Ave.)
4. Manhattan Ave. north City limit Recommend against
to 27th St.
Recommend against
Recommend against
Recommend against
Recommend against
O.K. to
delete
(Concur
with P1.
Commission)
71
Providing a parking structure down-
town to enhance business possibly on Recommend approval
northwest corner Pier/Manhattan Ave;
possibly trade land to obtain site.
5°
Concur with Planning
Commission; also ex-
plore other loca-
tions & finaringsd
alternatives includ-
ing an assessment
district.
Concur with
staff
N.
2
-- Continued EXHIBIT "A"
PG.
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF DKS
70
Provide residential parking
structures to elevate parking
deficiency in some neighborhoods
0
Recommend against;
instead examine in-
creasing required
parking per dwelling
via zoning ordinance
71
Planning Commission request to��
change title "non-residential" O T O
b
to "commercial" on page 71
Recommend approval
Recommend approval I Not recom-
with stipulation I mended
neighborhood approves
or upon request as 1
alternative to re- I
required on-site parking
Recommend approval
Concur with
Planning
Commission
Traffic intrusion on Monterey/
two-way traffic on Valley between
2nd and Herondo
(Refer to Exhibit "C")
Did not comment
Recommended to
add to Circulation
Element - need to
study matter.
Did not
study matter
71
Angle parking on Hermosa Avenue to
improve parting and create bicycle
lane —a �S✓f'iy ��
Did not comment but
received memo from
P.W.
Recommend to add to
Circulation Element
- need to study
Matter in future
Recommend
against
- , -
Exhibit B
January 2, 1990
CIRCULATION HISTORY
A. 1979 was the last year the City revised the Circulation
Element.
B. In 1986, the City Council requested to budget for the 86-87
fiscal year, a revised Circulation Element.
C. In January 1987 the RFP was approved by the City Council.
D. In July 1987, the agreement between DKS and the City was
signed (after going out to bid, interviewing and checking
references).
Between July 1987 and February 1988 the City staff and DKS
developed a precise scope of work and reorient new staff.
The scope of work was prolonged as a result of DKS losing its
original staff.
E. In March 1988, the City Council held a workshop with DKS to
develop a vision for the Circulation, Transportation, and
public parking in Hermosa Beach.
On June 28, 1988 the City Council requested that parking on
the west side of Pacific Coast Highway be studied for
conversion to a traffic lane. This addendum to the contract
also delayed completion.
F. In September 1988, DKS submitted the first draft document
which staff scrutinized carefully; there were needed
corrections, and there were omissions. DKS took twice the
time as estimated to make all the corrections.
G. In June 1989, a corrected draft document was received and
staff again examined it for accuracy, and completeness.
H. On July 27, 1989, the document was distributed for review.
I. On October 3, 1989, a public hearing before the Planning
Commission was held for input and the matter continued to
November 21, 1989.
J. On November 21, 1989, the Planning Commission adopted a
resolution approving the document with certain changes,
modifications, and additions.
EXHIBIT C
November 6, 1989
TO: Tony Antich, Director of Public Works
FROM: .Ed Ruzak, City Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: Neighborhood Traffic Intrusion on Monterey Blvd.
The Problem
Citizens complaints relative to neighborhood traffic intrusion on
Monterey Blvd. at Herondo Street during the morning commuter peak
period prompted a study of conditions to define the magnitude of the
problem.
Field Data Collection
On September 19, 20, and 21, 1989, the City conducted a manual turning
movement count of vehicles at the subject location with emphasis in
the westbound right turns into Monterey from Herondo and the eastbound
left turns into Monterey from Herondo.
The results of the counts for various periods are shown below:
On Herondo Street
Westbound Right turns Eastbound Left turns
Date Time Period into Monterey Blvd. into Monterey Blvd.
9/19/89 0715-0815 428 12
0815-0915 246 8
Total X74 20
9/20/89 0600-0715 188 6
0715-0815 443 14
Total 731 20
9/21/89 1500-1600 235 11
1600-1700 277 19 -
Total 512 30
Discussion
Field observations indicate that over 90% of the vehicles making the
right turns emerged from Redondo Beach streets. The closure of
Ardmore Avenue at Herondo Street due to a condominium development and
the change of Valley Drive between 2nd Street and Herondo Street to
one-way southbound have in effect eliminated two north/south corridors
that commuter traffic used to travel into (and through) Hermosa Beach.
,121-t; — 9 —
xv:. .'Ntehaa Trot '.s .3/4.9ia iir .aa�cri'Si;w�...�Eae-:r.;€ihs�et+�:�f::4n.,►.�.,swa�ri...lea
These latter corridors, Valley and Ardmore were used as an alternative
to the highly traveled Pacific Coast Highway corridor. When Valley
and Ardmore were effectively closed to northbound traffic at Herondo,
the commuters wisely sought other avenues. The closest corridor was
Monterey Blvd.
The table shows clearly that during both the AM and PM peak periods
that Monterey is being heavily used as the desired northbound corridor
(at least to 2nd Street).
Monterey Avenue can easily handle the additional traffic volume it is
incurring. The issue is whether the additional volume levels create
an intrusion to the residential quality of the residents along
Monterey Blvd. More importantly is. whether the safety for all the
users is compromised in this corridor due to the larger volume levels.
Thus, it does not appear that turn sign prohibitions will eliminate
the intrusion problem through Hermosa Beach.
Accident History
A review of the reported accident history for the last two and one
half years does not show any accidents involving the maneuvers that
are directly attributable to the intrusion pattern. The times of
occurrence do not coincide with the AM or PM peak periods where the
intrusion is taking place.
Only one accident in 1987 could be in any way close to being
attributed to the extra traffic. A vehicle northbound on Monterey at
0705 hit a parked car.
From a logistic standpoint, the drivers who turn left from Francisca
at Herondo Street must then turn right onto Monterey, then right onto
Second Street, thence left onto Valley Drive, in order to proceed
north. This is a reasonable travel pattern by that driver who does
not wish to travel the entire length of Monterey due to the prolific
number of four way stop controlled intersections along its path.
Thus, the circuitous loop necessary to reach Valley Drive exposes
drivers to somewhat greater travel distances, but also to greater
propensity for accident. The first problem of having to travel in a
circuitous manner tends to breed disrespect of stop controls (rolling
the stop sign) and accepting gaps in traffic that are not sufficient
to enter the traffic stream (greater propensity for broadside
accidents).
An obvious solution would be to convert Valley Drive from 2nd Street
to Herondo Street to two way operation. This would necessitate
re-channelization of the Valley/Herondo intersection and a restriping.
It could encourage more traffic along Valley Drive through the City.
The change in direction could require a change in the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, which is currently being reviewed at the
Planning Commission level.
-10-
_.. .y.._: �t_:.s:..... •*.+.At+k.aGa. Yai'.tc .;144.1.7. 061;444..°i4,^., •
Consideration of "No right turn" prohibitions for westbound Herondo
Street would serve to relieve Monterey Blvd. of this extra traffic.
However, it would force the commuter further west to Hermosa Avenue
where he doesn't necessarily choose to travel. Evidence of this is
the number of drivers who turn right onto Herondo Street from Redondo
Beach and then turn left in to Monterey Blvd. While small in
comparision to the westbound right turns, this left turn is still an
attempt to avoid travel along Hermosa Avenue.
Conclusions
The additional traffic along Herondo and Monterey may not lead to
accidents along these segments. The circuitous traffic movement and
volume of traffic would continue to increase if this routing is
perceived as a better way to travel than PCH. In this case it may be
difficult for residents to exit their driveways on to Monterey or exit
4th Street into Monterey.
Recommendations
It is recommended that the Planning Commission and City Council
consider the return of two way traffic on Valley Drive between 2nd
Street and Herondo Street by modifying the Circulation Element of the
General Plan.
Should this not be accomplished, the Traffic Engineeeer will monitor
the operation at this location at perodic intervals to insure safe
operation.
pworks/memoedr
x.... ,,: s.,.....1,1, _ 43,14,4,11..31. r;_u iVi*Lwl-::tzyn i �wa:+tr s.�.w..Nx:... �.��.:.:.�. dot.:. sa...,r .. rivua::: ls, r-«....._ia,,rw;m
QN/1 Q'J)12 f'B'
December 5, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of. Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council December 12, 1989
SUBJECT: DRAFT CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING ELEMENT
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL
PURPOSE: UPDATE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Recommendation
Open the public hearing to allow public input, direct staff and
consultants as deemed appropriate, and continue this matter to
January 9, 1990 for—final input and adoption.
Background
At the November 21, 1989 meeting, the Planning Commission held a
public hearing, and adopted a resolution recommending approval
with some changes, modifications and additions (see attached
resolution for details).
Analysis
The Planning staff has examined the draft document and is
generally pleased with its overall content. The document does
meet state requirements for General Plan circulation elements.
However, as noted in the October 3, 1989 Planning Commission
staff report, some corrective work as noted by the City's Traffic
Engineer is necessary (refer to Exhibit D). Also, comments by
the City manager and General Services Director need corrective
action, and/or response by the consultant (refer to Exhibits E
and F). Once the consultant has responded, all staff comments
will be consolidated into a staff recommendation.
In regard to the Planning Commission's recommendation found in
the attached resolution, the Planning staff does generally
concur, and the Public Works staff comments have been included on
an attached memorandum from the Public Works Director, dated
December 5, 1989.
It should be noted that the Public Works staff did receive
complaints concerning traffic intrusion on Monterey Blvd. during
morning peak traffic hours, and has prepared a response (refer to
Exhibit A).
Additional data concerning Gould Avenue has also been attached,
Exhibit B and C.
Once input from the public, and City Council has been received,
the consultant will then prepare a response where necessary, and
-(2-
provide a presentation at the January 9, 1990 City Council
meeting. A resolution adopting the final draft document with any
deletions, additions, or modifications should then be approved.
The adoption of this element is not an absolute commitment, but
instead it essentially indicates what should be considered in the
next 20 years. The final decision on implementation for each
considered project, such as making the parking lane along the
west side of Pacific Coast Highway a peak hour driving lane will
be made with details included at a future date. Adoption of this
element is only the first step.
Generally, the consultants would have attended both public
hearings, and had indicated they would do so. However, because
of a conflicting engagement, the consultant requested a
postponement. The City staff in an effort to expedite this
matter decided not to postpone the meeting. The consultant will
be at the January 9th meeting.
Attachments
1. Resolution P.0 89-93.
2. Memorandum from Public Works Director.
3. Exhibits A -F.
4. P.C. minutes of 11/21/89 meeting (which are not available
because the recording secretary is hospitalized).
5. P.C. minutes of 10/3/89 meeting.
6. Correspondence.
CONCUR:
"Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
t/ccsrcir
/3
RgspeCtfully submitted,
=-/ �i ji ��?
Michael Schubadt
Planning Director
November 15, 1989
Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach Planning Commission November 21, 1989
SUBJECT: REVISED GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION AND
PARKING ELEMENT
LOCATION: CITY-WIDE
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL
PURPOSE: PROVIDE AN UPDATE TO THE GENERAL PLAN
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve a resolution
recommending approval of the circulation element with all the
explanations, changes, modifications and/or additions as
determined needed in regard to the attached memorandums and
public correspondence, and any additional changes deemed
appropriate by the Planning Commission.
Background
At the meeting of October 3, 1989 the Planning Commission
accepted input concerning the revised element and continued the
matter to the November 21st meeting.
Analysis
The consultant has now had time to examine the input from the
previous public hearing, and will be able to address the issues
noted in the attached memorandums, correspondence, and minutes of
the October 3rd meeting.
The consultant will be giving an oral presentation at the
November 21st meeting.
Once the consultant has made the presentation, the Planning
Commission should provide their input and render a decision. The
input from the Planning Commission may be of such a nature that
additional data or changes are needed prior to recommending
approval; however, staff believes that in most instances, any
additional input or changes can be simply noted in the Planning
Commission's recommendation to the City Council.
No resolution has been provided at this time, since the
resolution should identify all changes, additions, deletions,
modifications etc. which the Planning Commission deep n,cessary.
t/pcsrcirc
v
Michael S�cha'ac
Planning Director
7
ru..lai!!v%,.it ,...--s+.•y S:.ev ..+.....!.s.cs.a.:Y`+aaE�ac rs;lu:xA: +�:oa... ._ .. :.,.+..r.esr .'1.++'anwn:i"�' _if.:d��' - ,. •� c
f)
RESOLUTION P.C. 89-93
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE CIRCULATION,
TRANSPORTATION, AND PARKING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN WITH THE
FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS, DELETIONS AND ADDITIONS AS NOTED BLOW.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on
October 3 and November 21, 1989 to receive oral and written
testimony and made the following Findings:
A. The said document is a state mandated General Plan Element;
B. The document revises the current Circulation Element;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
does hereby recommend the adoption of the Circulation,
Transportation and Parking Element of General Plan prepared by
DKS Associates, June, 1989, subject to the following
modifications, deletions and additions (note: Page numbers
correspond to the subject document):
Circulation
1.
Add "No Left Turn" during evening peak hours at certain
Pacific Coast Highway intersections as determined appropriate
by staff.
2. Eliminate proposed
Prospect Avenue/Artesia
east/west widening as noted on page 33.
3. Eliminate the proposed signalization of
intersections as noted on pages 33 though 36.
4. Include studying of widening of Ardmore Avenue from Pier
Avenue to Second Street in the near future, and after the
recently approved residential development is completed, the
widening of Second Street to First Street.
The Pier Avenue to Second Street widening study should be
completed and considered prior to the recommendation noted on
page 37.
5. No one-way streets (page 38).
6. Gould Avenue should remain a collector street with 35 m.p.h.
speed limit.
7. Once the parking lane along the west side of Pacific Coast
Highway is converted to a southbound lane during peak hour
traffic, the left hand turning lane onto Prospect Avenue
south bound from Aviation should be examined if problems
persist.
Boulevard
unsignalized
-+++i :•x to
-/S -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Transportation
1. No bike path along the railroad right-of-way as noted on page
60.
2. Eliminate the proposed "limited truck route" as noted on page
62.
Parking
1. Add the recommendation that more business should be
encouraged through parking, and sites, such as the northwest
corner of Manhattan Avenue and Pier Avenue should be
considered, for a parking structure, and/or possibly trading
land to improve the downtown situation.
2. Eliminate the residential parking structure proposal noted on
page 70, and instead add examining requiring additional
parking per dwelling via the zoning ordinance.
3. Change the title "Non -Residential..." on page 71 to
"Commercial...".
VOTE: AYES: Comms.Ingell,Ketz,Moore,Peirce,Chmn.Rue
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 89-93 is a
true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning
Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their
regular meeting of November 21, 1989.
Rue, Chairman
p/perscirc
Michael Schubach, Secretary
_.. �.r•=,.rS vn..�.w+r6006W614.4•441,05.444411
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPART ENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: " Kathleen Midstokke, Councilmember
FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning Difector
•
SUBJECT: Circulation Element Memo
DATE: December 26, 1989
Since the Circulation Element was a "joint" effort, and several
of the items mentioned in your memo were related to reports
prepared by the Public Works Director, I have referred those
items to him. However, I can say that Pier/Valley/Ardmore was
definitely included (see page 34). -
As for the merchant shuttle it was also included.
I have attached my presentation which relates to the time taken
for completing this element. Please note also that the City
Council's request for a more detailed study of the traffic lane
on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway caused also about a six
month delay.
X77 -
/17_
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kathleen Midstokke, Councilmember
FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Detail List of Billings as Requested
DATE: January 3, 1990
Please find attached a detailed list of billings.
There are no cost overruns and there will not be any. The City
will pay up to the "not to exceed" amount in the contract, and no
more without justification and approval by the City Council.
cc: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager
July 18, 1989
CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXPENDITURE UPDATE
(145-400-3406-4201)
1. ORIGINAL APPROPRIATION:
2. EXPENDITURE:
Invoice
No.
8616
8740
9284
9375
9836
10044
10557
10588
10673
11028
11143
Ending
Period
9/17/87
10/16/87
2/19/88
3/18/88
7/1/88
8/26/88
12/16/88
1/13/89
2/10/89
5/5/89
6/2/89
Billing
Amount
$8,786.98
$7,973.48
$24,324.70
$4,674.99
$11,504.83
$5,246.40
$7,189.85
$2,649.60
$1,854.64
$307.92
$119.10
$74,632.49
$70,000
5,000 -- Public Works
$75,000
P.O. Remaining
No. Amount Remarks
3556 $66,213.02 Paid
3560 $58,239.54 Paid
6018 $33,914.84 Paid ($17,732)
On hold ($6,592.7):47
6019 $29,239.85 Paid
6028 $17,735.02 Paid
$12,488.62 On hold
$5,298.77 On hold
$2,649.17 On hold
$794.53 On hold
$486.61 On hold
$367.51 On hold
....a.� w 4.�-CM.,f}�o •F.., ag.'...n.._. .iW�.welk
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM
FROM: Tony Antich, Director of Public Works CO'
TO: Michael Schubach, Director of Planning
DATE: January 3, 1990
SUBJECT: Response to your request dated December 21, 1989
*****************************************************************
It's good to be back after being on Holiday since December 22,
1989. I really needed the time away. Hope you enjoyed your
holidays.
Mike, I hope -the information below helps to answer Councilmember
Kathy Midstokke's concerns about follow-up to City Council
actions on 2-24-87 and 5-12-87.
COUNCILMEMBER'S QUESTION: Following are a list of various
council actions with direction that these items be included in
the new Circulation Element. I would like confirmation that all
these issues were properly studied and are included in the
document.
2-24-87 Traffic Impact Report H.B. Pavilion
5-12-87 Closure of median breaks at 9th St., 17th St.,
18th St., and 20th St.
RESPONSE: 2-24-87 Traffic Impact Report H.B. Pavilion
On January 19, 1987, the Public Works Department staff prepared a
report to City Council as a follow-up to City Council Resolution
No. 86-4973 regarding a traffic study for the then proposed
Hermosa Beach Pavilion at the northwest intersection of Pacific
Coast Highway and 16th Street. This traffic report represented a
study of the traffic, circulation and access conditions
associated with the proposed project.
The matter was continued from the Council meeting of January 27th
to February 14th and then postponed to February 24th, 1987.
Final City Council action occurred on February 24, 1987. From
the Minutes of 2-24-87 the final Council action was as follows:
Action: Accept the engineering report, direct staff to
send letter to developer asking that cash be deposited
with City, that a #4 be added to staff recommendation:
"This traffic report be given to the Planning commission
when they examine the Circulation Element of the General.
Plan, and to the consultant preparing the EIR on the ATSF
proposal"; and adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO.
87-5019, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. N.S. 2435, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING THERETO
NO STOPPING ZONES ON A CERTAIN SECTION OF SIXTEENTH
STREET AS HEREIN SET FORTH."
Motion DeBellis, second Cioffi. So ordered.
A copy of this report was forwarded to the Planning Department
and AT&SF consultant.
I've looked through the Public Works Department files and have
found no reference indicating that the traffic study report was
forwarded to the Planning Commission. Nor did I find the report
located within the draft Circulation Element. The Circulation
Element consultant (DKS) properly studied the issue:
- the traffic impacts associated with the Hermosa Beach Pavilion
within the report starting on page 29.
- Figures 9 and 10 show two alternatives to improve the
circulation at Pier/Valley/Ardmore.
- Impacts to the intersection of Pier/Valley/Ardmore were
considered. Appendix E of the Circulation Element discusses the
potential signalization of Pier/Valley/Ardmore.
RESPONSE: 5-12-87 Closure of median breaks at 9th Street, 17th
Street, 18th Street and 20th Street (on Hermosa Avenue).
On April 30, 1987, a Public Works Staff memorandum about the
potential closure of Hermosa Avenue median breaks at 9th Street,
17th, 18th and 20th Streets was presented to City Council on May
12, 1987.
The final Council action on May 12, 1987 was as follows:
Action: To approve staff recommendation that Council
authorize staff to not consider CIP 85-130 at this time
and that closing of the median breaks be considered with
the Circulation Element.
Motion Rosenberger, second Mayor Cioffi. So ordered.
I spoke to Michael Meyer (DKS) and his notes show no discussion
at the March 1988 workshop. This subject is not discussed in the
Circulation Element document.
The closure of the Hermosa Avenue median breaks at 9th Street,
17th Street, 18th Street and 20th Street is consistent with
implementation policy 3-4
"Remodel existing public parking lots and street
spaces as necessary to improve efficiency, safety
and urban design",
and can be reconsidered by City Council when it considers the
Circulation Element or at a later time.
cc: City Manager
Attachments:
2-24-87 Minutes and Staff Report
5-12-87 Minutes and Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
January 3, 1990
Kevin Northcraft, City Manager
Anthony Antich, Director of Public Works C{ CL
Hermosa Beach Council concerns about parking on PCH
in Redondo Beach.
Spoke to Ken Montgomery (213)318-0661 on 1-3-90.
Question:
Response:
Question:
Response:
Question:
Response:
What is status of parking removals along PCH in
Redondo Beach?
No move afoot for p.m. peak hour restriction. Not much
opportunity for widening given right of way width.
New developments required to dedicate ten feet plus an
additional five foot set back. Not achievable to add
third lane by parking restrictions during the p.m.
peak hours.
Would Redondo Beach cooperate if Hermosa Beach removed
parking?
Unable to because of insufficient right of way,
however would look at an intersection review for
capacity improvements.
Is right of way needed.
Currently in the widest spot, the R -R -O -W is 80 feet.
An additional right of way of 10 foot on each side of
PCH.
The bottom line is that Redondo Beach has a different curb to
curb width than Hermosa Beach and a third lane could not occur
without massive road reconstruction.
cc: Michael Schubach, Planning Director
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kathleen Midstokke, Councilmember
FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning tfrector
g 1 ------
SUBJECT: Reopening of Valley Drive to Two -Way Traffic.
DATE: January 4, 1990
The Planning Commission received the information provided by Ed
Ruzak regarding the reopening of Valley Drive, but did not
comment.
Staff has researched the files and was unable to find any
information. After talking with long-time employees it was
learned that Valley Drive was made one way in 1964.
Staff believes Valley Drive was made one-way to restrict commuter
traffic north bound.
Staff did discover that Ardmore was closed in May, 1975, but no
information as to why was included.
Staff believes it was also closed to restrict commuter traffic
(refer to attached minutes).
p/memo
21/
Concession Lease - Municipal Pier (Continued)
3152
FURTHER ACTION - to approve the replacement of the conduit under the
Municipal Pier and repainting of restrooms, exterior of building,
and benches as set forth in a memorandum dated May 8, 1975, from
Edward T. Putz, Director of Public Works, and not to authorize the
replacement of missing bumper pilings but to direct that a sign be
placed in that area indicating that no docking of ships or fishing
boats is permitted.
Motion by Councilman Widman - Second by Councilwoman Tyson
Carried
Ayes: Councilmen Doerfling, Tyson, Widman, Mayor Barks
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Post
PERMITS REQUIRED FOR NONHOUSEHOLD ANIMALS AND MORE THAN TWO HOUSEHOLD
PETS - ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 506,, INTRODUCED APRIL 22, 1975 ,,
ACTION - to waive further reading.
Motion by Councilman Doerfling - Second by Councilwoman Tyson
Carried
Ayes: Councilmen Doerfling, Tyson, Widman, Mayor Barks
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Post
FURTHER ACTION - to adopt Ordinance No. N. S. 506, entitled: "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER
4, "ANIMALS AND FOWL", OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO HOUSEHOLD PETS AND
PERMITS REQUIRED TO KEEP CERTAIN ANIMALS."
Motion by Councilman Doerfling - Second by Councilwoman Tyson
Carried
Ayes: Councilmen Doerfling, Tyson, Widman, Mayor Barks
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Post
PLANNING COMMISSION - ATTENDANCE AT CONFERENCES - Discussion requested
by Councilman Doerfling.
ACTION - to establish the following policy with regard to attendance
at appropriate conferences by members of the Planning Commission:
(1) Only two Commissioners shall attend any specific confernce at
one time; and
(2) Each Commissioner shall attend only one conference per year; and
(3) All such conferences shall be those held within the State of
California; and
(4) Reasonable expenses including registration fees and transportation
costs shall be paid by the City of Hermosa Beach, and the City
shall also provide an amount not to exceed $100.00 for food and
lodging, receipts for which are to be turned in to the Finance
Department with request for reimbursement.
Motion by Councilman Doerfling - Second by Councilman Widman
Carried
Ayes: Councilmen Doerfling, Tyson, Widman, Mayor Barks
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Post
STREET CLOSURE - ARDMORE AVENUE AT HERONDO STREET - Memorandum dated
May 7, 1975 from Edward T. Putz, Director of Public Works; memorandum
dated April 24, 1975 from Edward T. Putz, Director of Public Works; •
memorandum dated April 25, 1975 from Edward T. Putz, Director of
Public Works; memorandum dated April 28, 1975 from Claude G. Stonier,
Chief of Police; memorandum dated April 25, 1975 from C. D. Fowler,
Fire Chief; memorandum dated May 8, 1975 from Rod Merl, Planning
Director.
-zS-
Minutes 5/13/75
Street Closure - Ardmore Avenue at Herondo Street (Continued)
ACTION - to authorize the City Engineer to close Ardmore Avenue at
Herondo Street and to request that the County Road Department effect
such change in the plans for the Herondo Street Construction Project,
Valley Drive to Maria Avenue.
Motion by Councilman Doerfling - Second by Councilman Widman
Carried
Ayes: Councilmen Doerfling, Tyson, Widman.
Noes: Mayor Barks
Absent: Councilman Post
3153 •
PROPOSED STATE LEGISLATION - CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL - Consideration
requested by Councilman Widman.
ACTION - to affirm conceptual approval of Senate Bill 839, regarding
the Soby decision; Assembly Bill 1998, regarding funding for transit
systems; Senate Bill 192, regarding parking tickets; Assembly Bill
1604, the "beach bill"; and A.C.A. 22, which could benefit our Senior
Citizens with regard to property taxes, said affirmation to be brought
to the attention of our legislators during the Mayors' and Councilmen's
Legislative Conference in Sacramento May 19-21, 1975.
Motion by Councilman Widman - Second by Councilman Doerfling
So ordered.
TRASH COLLECTION - DOWNTOWN AREA - The City Council concurred with
Councilman Widman's request that the staff be directed to negotiate
with Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., Waste Systems
Division, this City's contractor for trash collection, regarding the
consolidation of trash bins, not enclosed, in the downtown area.
POLICE RESERVE PROGRAM - REQUEST FOR STATUS REPORT - The Council
concurred with the request of Councilman Widman for a report from the
Chief of Police regarding this City's Police Reserve system, such as
the number of persons in the program, how they are used, and the
_training they receive.
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 - The City Council
concurred with the recommendation of Councilman Widman, based
upon an informational memorandum from Rod Merl, Planning Director,
dated May 7, 1975, that this City not consider participation in the
•revised Cooperation Agreement with Los Angeles County under which
cities would have no legal veto power over any project and which
carries no guarantee of ever receiving any funds.
PERSONNEL SESSION
ACTION - to adjourn to a personnel session to discuss various
personnel matters.
Motion by Councilman Doerfling - Second by Councilwoman Tyson
So ordered.
This meeting was adjourned to a personnel session at 8:55 p.m. and
reconvened in the Council Chamber at 9:50 p.m., at which time Mayor
Barks announced that various personnel matters had been discussed.
2 6— Minutes 5/13/75
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Anthony Antich, Director of Public Works
FROM: Ed Ruzak, City Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: Gould Avenue Resident's Petition
DATE: November 8, 1989
On August 3, 1989 the Public Works Department received a petition
from residents on Gould Avenue west of Valley Drive requesting:
1. Convert the present #1 westbound lane on Artesia Boulevard at
Pacific Coast Highway to a second non -optional left turn lane, as
is provided in the current General Plan. Place this goal in the
new General Plan that is being drafted.
2. Reduce the speed limit on Gould Avenue east of Ardmore to 25
mph by reclassifying it "local" in the new General Plan being
drafted.
3. Install "rumble dots" to warn motorists to slow down as they
enter Hermosa Beach.
4. On Gould Avenue west of Valley Drive, remove the bike lane
markings to replace them with the parking spaces that were lost a
few years ago.
This letter -type report reflects the results of our investigation
of these issues.
1. Discussions and correspondence with Caltrans traffic
engineering personnel, indicated that there are some geometric
design problems with the proposal as stated. The intersection
angle that Artesia Boulevard makes with Pacific Coast Highway is
not at 90 degrees. The #1 westbound left turn lane traffic would
thus have to travel on a vehicle path that is far outside of the
travel path of its companion inside left turn lane. This is also
in part due to the "protrusion" of the median island on the south
leg of Pacific Coast Highway unto Artesia Boulevard.
Caltrans, which has jurisdiction over both State designated
highway (SR 91 for Artesia and SR 1 for PCH) also would like to
restrict curb parking along the west side of PCH south of Artesia
Boulevard. In this manner they believe that the dual left turn
traffic would be able to travel in the southbound curb lane for a
longer distance prior to having to merge into the existing two
lane configuration.
The City has not been amenable, to date, to restricting curb
parking along PCH in this area. Thus, discussions relative to
these issues continue.
2. The City Traffic Engineer and City Council have reviewed this
issue at length and have deemed that the present roadway
classification and posted speed limit are commensurate with the
character of the roadway use.
3. The installation of "rumble dots" to warn motorists to slow
down as they enter Hermosa Beach was reviewed. The research that
has been accomplished with respect to rumble dots has been done
primarily on high speed (55 mph) approaches to traffic signals or
at the end of freeway conditions. Efforts on the collector and
arterial system would produce noise levels that we believe would
be undesirable to both residential and commercial users on Gould
Avenue. If there is any effectiveness to rumble strips is is the
high noise factor that serves to alert motorists to the upcoming
STOP at a signal or STOP sign on a high speed approach.
Most drivers traveling westbound across PCH onto Gould Avenue are
aware of the downgrade and the upcoming STOP sign at Ardmore
Avenue. These commuters, in our opinion, would not slow down
regardless of the rumble effect.
Another'negative feature of "rumble strips" is the constant
maintenance of the pavement markers (dots) that make up the
rumble effect. The continual travel over the dots dislodges them
and reduces the rumble effect. Maintenance costs increase
dramatically.
The pattern of dots to establish the rumble effect is such that
most of the pavement would be covered at two to three locations
along Gould Avenue. In wet or foggy weather the propensity for
loss of control by motorcycles, bicyclists and four wheeled
vehicles increases. The slick surface of the dot does not
provide the coefficient of friction that asphalt pavement does.
4. The bicycle lane markings on the north side of Gould Avenue
between Valley Drive and Morningside Drive are four feet wide.
The westbound through lane is only eleven feet wide. The
eastbound through lane is approximately 14 feet wide, but is
located adjacent to parking stalls that are perpendicular to
Gould Avenue. There would not be room to adequately place
parallel parking on the north side without restructuring the
through lanes and narrowing the perpendicular parking stall
lengths. This would lead to parked vehicles protruding into the
eastbound through lane. It is difficult in its present
configuration to have these parkers/unparkers backing into the
Gould Avenue lanes. The trade off is the ability to provide more
parking for the park users on the south side of Gould Avenue.
Returning parking to the north side of Gould would also visually
"close up" what is now an open area to the north. Users that
would park on the north side would invariably cross to reach the
park mid -block. Perpendicular parking and parallel parking on a
- 28_
narrowed street condition would, in our opinion, contribute to a
condition that would reduce sight lines, encourage mid -block
crossings and reduce the overall safety and operation in this
area.
er/pworks
EXHIBIT D
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael Schubach, Planning Director
FROM: Anthony Antich, Director of Public Works C\.'\'
SUBJECT: Comments to the Draft Circulation Element dated
June 1989
DATE: September 26, 1989
1. GENERAL COMMENTS: The document is weak in the area of
improvements and does not appear to suggest many long range
improvements.
2. WORK REQUESTED BY CITY BUT NOT COMPLETED BY DKS: On February
6, 1989, I wrote you a memo commenting on DKS's January 1989
draft Circulation Element. You forwarded the memo to DKS. Below
is a listing of the work still not completed.
Table 1: Still has many needed corrections. Spot sampling was
done and there are too many errors. This needs to be re -checked
and re -done. Attached is a copy of Table 1.
Table 2: Define the peak hours, i.e, 3 to 7, 4 to 6 etc...What
are the peak hours? Table 2 and Figure 2 do not match.
Street Segment Table 2 Figure 2
Gould W/O Valley 9,105 9,110
Hermosa S/O 2nd -0- 13,900 Not shown
on table
2nd Street PCH/Prospect no reference 600 it It
3rd Street PCH/Prospect " It 460 " "
Artesia E/O Harper " " 22,700 "I "
Artesia Prospect/PCH " " 23,400 " "
PCH Artesia/Pier " it 47,000 " ."
PCH Pier Aviation If " 49,000 " "
PCH Aviation/Herondo " " 54,500 " "
PCH South Herondo " it 55,000 " "
Figure 19: Need to include: Parking Lot E (pay public lot) is
located at the southeast corner of Beach Drive and 15th Street.
There is an additional free parking lot located west of City Hall
on Bard Street.
Page 31: What findings are supplied to support the statement
that 430 vehicles per hour would shift to PCH? I do not agree
with DKS's findings because they didn't provide supporting data
in the appendix. Changed from 500 (January 1989 draft) to 430
vehicles in the June report.
3
o-
�.E.4!Je .2 •,. s...yiat�..F.' .,. w.. i., S:aM1iF
3. COMMENTS BY CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER, ED RUZAK: Attached are
comments by the City Traffic Engineer.
4. COMMENTS BY DIRECTOR:
Page 29: Refers to Table 11 as "Future trip - making resulting:
from the developments" - this is actually Table 12. Correct
Table 11 and 12 to correspond with text.
A. DKS defines streets according to the traffic volume.
Traffic volume counts were not taken on Monterey north of Pier
Avenue. However, DKS is recommending that the street be
designated as a collector. Why?
5. APPENDIX:
Appendix "A":
Table 4: It takes about the
through the City (along PCH)
during peak hours. The peak
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
"B"
"C"
"D"
"E"
"F"
"G"
No
No
No
No
No
No
comments
Comments
comments
comments
comments
comments
same amount of time to travel
during "non -peak" hours as it does
hour commuter is not being delayed.
at this
at this
at this
at this
at this
at this
time.
time.
time.
time.
time.
time.
li' AS50,e1ATES:I
TO: ANTHONY ANTICHDtRF_CTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: ED RUZAK
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY CIRCULATION ELEMENT DRAFT REPORT
DATE: JULY 20.1989
jam//
-.0
`
/ ;'
I have reviewed the draft circulation element report dated
June, 1989 ,prepared by DKS Associates. My comments are listed
below.
In brief, This is a much better document than we have
received. Not much of the technical content has been changed
drastically (or at all) as we requested in our previous
critiques. However, it appears that this is the consultants last
and final effort.
Pg. 3. Last Paragraph- The project is completed and the problems
with he jog in PCH, the access into the "Weinerschnitzel" parcel
and, efficiency of PCH traffic with the improvement should be
touched on.
Pa. 4 Under Policy 5 discuss what happened if anything with
respect to the policy relative to a median on Aviation Blvd. Was
it implemented? Ans. No. Why not?
Pg. 5 Policy 10 Mention that no turn prohibitions were
ever implemented at Pier Avenue.
Pg. 15 Indicate that portions of this bicycle facility are in
Redondo Beach and they actively participate in keeping its
operation safe.
Pg. 19 Policy 19 If the mid -block barriers they speak about are
those on the Strand, then the Strand should be specifically
mentioned. I do not believe there are mid -block barriers anywhere
else in Hermosa Beach.
Pg 11 Objective 3.0 Comment. This is clear that the City will
provide parking for insiders not outsiders! Only those outsiders
that come to Hermosa to use the commercial services would be
considered for parking. Thus the reasoning for Implementation
of Policy 3.0
Pg 12 Implementation Policy 3.4 Mention that remodeling street
spaces means providing more spaces for greater use and revenue.
Pg 12 Policy 4.0 LOS "D" may be more reasonable as volume levels
and congestion in the South Bay continue into the future.
10061 TALBERTAVENUE SUITE200 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 964.4880
3Z_-
Pg. 13 Policy 4.2 This is very dangerous in its present
It means reconstruction of the intersection or
REMOVALS". If Traffic Engineering doesn't pursue this do
a liability problem? Does this conflict with the need to
parking for residents?
wording.
"PARKING
we have
maximize
Pa. 13 Policy 4.5 Isn't this in conflict with the parking
residents and commercial business objectives?
Pg. 13 Policy 4.7 Does the City Council really want to start
build sidewalks?
for
Pa. 13 Policy 4.8 There needs to be guidelines provided in this
report to address this problem. The consultant didn't address it
nor did he inventory pavement sections in the City. This was left
to the City to do.
Pg. 20 We need a traffic volume for Monterey Blvd., even if it
is an estimate. Same for Fifth Street.
Table 1. Take out the Column on Pavement Condition since City
will do this at a later date. A blank should not be left in an
entire column in the final report.
Figure 3.-- I realize there may not have been recent data for
Monterey and Manhattan Blvds.,but a traffic flow map must be
continuous and have data for the major street system, i.e
collectors and arterials. Show some band widths for Monterey and
Manhattan.
Pg. 24 Using a peak hour warrant is an easy way out for not
collecting a lot of data. The consultant should mention in the
body of the text that normally the eight highest hour warrants
are used but that this study chose for expediency to do it their
way. We do not want to get locked in to having to defend a one
hour warrant to install a signal. The consultant does talk.•'about
all warrants in the Appendix but not in the main body of the
report.
Pg. 26. The rates Citywide and for Los Angeles County should be
referenced or listed here for this route.
Pg. 33 What about mention of PCH diverted traffic using Ardmore
in the second paragraph2
Pg. 33 Has Caltrans been consulted to see if they even consider
the need to widen the east and west legs of Artesia at Prospect?.
Is the right of way available? Reference any Caltrans input.
-33-
4
Pg. 34 Here is where using just one warrant, the peak hour
warrant is not acceptable. A discussion of the complex
Valley/Ardmore intersections with Gould and at Pier necessitates
looking at more than one hour of traffic volume.
Pa. 35 and Figure 9 & 10. Where is a one common intersection
strategy? These two other schemes are woefully lacking in any
careful analysis. Example. There is not even one mention of the
Hermosa Valley School impacts. The school is "only" adjacent to
Valley Drive. Figure 10 shows a large note to provide a crosswalk
for joggers. Where did the consultant consider the pedestrian
access, bicycle flow to and from school and other uses in this
corridor? What does the consultant propose at 16th Ardmore and at
his extended 16th Valley intersection? Figure 9 shows transition
pavement arrows for two lanes southbound merging in to one at the
point where the railroad right of way parking lot driveway is and
close to where all of City Hall customers exit onto Valley Drive
at Eleventh Place. Doesn't widening Valley Drive fall in
conflict .with the objectives to preserve the railroad right of
way. The discussion of these issues is not broached by the
consultant.
Figure 11- Why is Hermosa Avenue listed as a major arterial north
of Pier Avenue? It loses its arterial character at Pier. Also why
isn't Manhattan Blvd. listed as a collector street? Discussion is
needed on these two items..
Figure 11- There needs to be an extension of Ardmore as a
collector street to Herondo. It is my understanding that the City
still has an easement to the south on Ardmore that could allow
extension to Herondo if necessary in the future. Do not preclude
future Council's from this opportunity to extend this street.
Page 38 & 39 The one way streets discussion skirts the real issue
of whether the city should coinsider wholesale one way street
conversions due to narrow street width, neighborhood intrusion by
commuter traffic and the ability to get more curb parking for
residents. The discussion also fails to talk about the advantages
and disasdvantages of a Monterey/ Manhattan one way couplet.
The general advantages/disadvantages statements in the text are
fine, but do not address the specific situations on each couplet.
The recommended one way couplets in the 27th to 35th Street area
have been tried and rebuffed by the neighborhood. They are small
issues in comparison to Valley /Ardmore and Monterey/Manhattan.
Pg. 50, last paragraph. The bicycle route along the Strand is
technically a bicycle path. It connects to an on street bicycle
"path" on .Hermosa Avenue that eventually connects to the
Manhattan beach bicycle "path"along the beach north of our City.
Figure 17 This figure is not correct for marked crosswalks. They
must all be removed from this figure. We have the upgraded school
crosswalk location map. It is modified each year. This figure
should simply show the walking corridors.
Page 62 In California we use the Caltrans traffic Manual for our
signing. rather than the MUTCD. While the MUTCD is referenced in
Caltrans manual it would be preferable to reference the truck
limit signs from Caltrans Manual rather than the Federal manual.
Pg. 67 & 68 Once again the consultant simply used the old 1981
parking study to recommend the need for 800 to 1000 additional
spaces. With all of the data that was collected in the DKS
parking study, it would appear that a greater discussion to
justify this number would have been presented. In addition the
possible locations for the sites for structures based upon the
curb and offstreet parking data and land availability would have
been of greater assistance to the City in determining where and
what to consider.
Pg. 69 fifth paragraph. I have yet to see "surplus "parking from
a new development, nor will this "surplus help alleviate parking
deficiencies." The magnitude of deficiency has not clearly been
defined by the consultant other than parroting the 1981 study.
The Technical Appendix has much of the backup material from the
data collection phase of the study . We do need to receive the
program and the raw data sheets that DKS used to develop the
transportation model for forecasting the future trips in the
City. This has not been provided.
-3S
Table 1
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CIRCULATION ELEMENT
EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
ROADWAY
FROM/TO
EXISTING
LENGTH STRIPING/
(miles) GEOMETRICS
EXISTING
WIDTH
(feet)
RIGHT-OF-WAY
WIDTH PAVEMENT
(feet) TYPE
EXISTING
PAVEMENT FUNCTIONAL
CONDITION * CLASSIFICATION
EXISTING ESTIMATED
DAILY AVG. DAILY
VOLUME CAPACITY**
EAST -WEST STREETS
Herondo Street
Artesia Boulevard/
Gould Avenue
1 --i► 21st Street
21st Court
Pier Avenue
Aviation Boulevard
Lynden Street
1st Court Dr*'e
Hermosa Ave./Valley Dr.
Harper Ave./Pacific Coast Hwy.
Pacific Coast Hwy./E1 Oeste P1.
El Oeste P1./Ardmore Ave.
Ardmore Ave./Morningside Drive
Harper Ave./Rhodes St.
Rhodes St./Pacific Coast Hwy.
Pacific Coast Hwy./Ardmore Ave.
Valley Dr./Power St.
Power St./12Q' W. of Power St.
S It IV ! y/;a2MCSi
0.09 2 lanes
0.23
0.13
0.17
0.29
4 lanes w/ med.
4 lanes w/ med.
4 lanes w/ It
2 lanes
0.20 2 lanes
0.07 2 lanes
0.13 2 lanes
0.11 2 lanes
h1�air4//�� sa
0.02 2 lanes
WALK 6r.
-.o�/ 2 !.
Dr.
each v 9 NyAfifiN �✓ 0.05 e y 2 lanes
Pacific Coast Hwy./btwn Ardmore and Valley
Btwn Ardmore and Valley/Hermosa Ave.
Hermosa Ave./the Municipal Pier
Harper Ave./Pacific Coast Hwy.
Hermosa Ave./Monterey B1.
Monterey 81./Pale
First Street
Second Street
Fourth Street
Fifth Street
Strand/Hermosa Ave.
Hermosa Ave./Monterey Bl.
Ardmore/PCH
PCH/Barney Ct.
Barney Ct./Prospect Ave.
The Strand/Valley Drive
Valley Dr./PCH
PCH/Prospect Ave.
Hermosa Ave./Monterey B1.
Monterey B1./Culper St.
Ardmore Ave./PCH
PCH/Ocean View Ave.
Hopkins/Prospect Ave.
Cochise Ave./Ardmore Ave.
sr -Ft P/!taRrRo4.A
Ardmore Ave. CH
PCH/Prospect Ave.
0.12
0.32
0.10
0.42
0.10
4 lanes
4 lanes
2 lanes
4 lanes
2 lanes
0.06 1 lane
0.03 .z iagwAI-I' sr.
0.10 2 lanes
0.13 2 lanes
0.18 2 lanes
0.13 2 lanes
0.25
0.22
0.32
0.10
0.02
0.14
0.05
0.07
0.03
. Oro
0.14
0.17
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
WALI< Sr
2 lanes
2 lanes
28 30
80 100
BO 100
44 100
30 40
40 60
36 60
30 60
24 40
20 40
11 60
�0 30
72 100
80 100
80 100
64 80
28 40
18 20
16 60
38 60
24 40
30 60
28 40
40 60
28 40
24 40
41 60
20 30
28 40
23 40
29 40
28 40
60
27 40
30 60
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Cement
Asphalt
Asphalt
Plt
Cement
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Concrete
Concrete
Asphalt
Asphalt
Concrete
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt'
Concrete
Concrete
Concrete
Asphalt
CQWc-
Concrete
Concrete
Arterial
Arterial
Collector
Collector
Collector
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Arterial
Arterial
Arterial
Arterial
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Collector
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
of
Local
Collector
13,000
29,000
22.000
12,890 22,000
9,105 15,000
2,500
2,500
2,260 2,500
2,500
2,500 T
2.6.13°'‘
2,500
20,800 29,000
12,550 29,000
5,350 13,000
29,450 29,000
2.500
800
;.504 r
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
4,600 15,000
3,000 2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500 i
b .
2.500
15,000
Table 1
CITY OF IERMOSA BEACH CIRCULATION ELEMENT
EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
ROADWAY
FROM/TO
Fifth Court
Fourth Court
Third Street
Third Court
First Place
Sixth Street
Eight Street
Tenth Street
Eleventh Street
11th Court Drive
Thirteenth Street
13th Court Drive
Eleventh Place
Massey Ave./Reynolds Ln.
Hermosa Ave./Strand
Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave.
Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave.
EXISTING
LENGTH STRIPING/
(miles) GEOtETRICS
EXISTING
WIDTH
(feet)
RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EXISTING ESTIMATED
WIDTH PAVEMENT PAVEMENT FUNCTIONAL DAILY AVG. DAILY
(feet) TYPE CONDITION + CLASSIFICATION VOLUME CAPACITY**
w/o Ardmore deadends
Ardmore/PCH
PCH/Prospect Ave.
NICK n48d41 SJ IRNA
Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave.
Ardmore Ave./PCH
Barney Ct./Prospect Ave.
Hermosa Ave./Valley Dr.
Ardmore Ave./Prospect Ave.
Prospect Ave./Reynolds Ln.
"Pi -RAND/ H1 i • Aki
Hermosa Ave./Lona Dr.
Loma Dr./Valley Dr.
Valley Dr./Ardmore Ave.
Ardmore Ave./PCN
FCH/Prospect Ave.
Propsect Ave./Reynolds Ln.
STRAND/Rog., V.
The Strand/Loma Dr.
Ardmore Ave./PCH
PCH/Propsect Ave.
Propsect Ave./Reynolds Ln.
The Strand/Hermosa Ave.
Monterey/Loma Dr.
Lona Dr./Valley Dr.
Ardmore/PCH
Prospect/Reynolds Ln.
Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave.
The Strand/Hermosa Ave.
PCH/Ocean Dr.
Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave.
Bard St./Valley Dr.
0.04
0.06
2 lanes
2 lanes
0.04 1 lane
0.03 1 lane
0.05
0.12
0.30
•05
0.02
0.10
0.14
0.25
0.11
0.15
.o)
0.13
0.11
0.01
0.10
0.19
0.28
0.16
0.10
0.24
0.14
0.07
0.02
0.12
0.10
0.10
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
W/t.1< ST
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
WALK Sr.
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
/!A l.f< 6 7:
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
0.06 1 lane
0.08 .Z-lame,--.....S..1.f+c�.51.
0.12 2 lanes
0.07 2 lanes
0.03 2 lanes
27
16
17
17
24
24
28
16
19
24
26
40
60
20
20
40
40
40
Lo
20
40
40
Asphalt
Concrete
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Co o•/c
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
40 60 Asphalt
29 40 Concrete
24 40 Concrete
I , L o 1t
40 60 Asphalt
25 40 Asphalt
30 60 Asphalt
27 40 Asphalt
19 25 Asphalt
25-30 40 Conc.-Asph.
1'7
60
q
34 60 Asphalt
29 40 Concrete
25 40 Asph.-Conc.
25 40 Asphalt
38
30
24
27
25
20
60
60
40
40
40
20
13-37 60
24
20
40
20
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt ,
Asphalt
Asphalt
26 60 Asphalt
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
t from
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 1,020 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500 ,�
e. giber
Collector 15,000
Collector 4.550 15,000
Collector 15,000
Collector 4,960 15,000
Local 2,500
Local 2,5000 ,
f,
Local 2,500
Local 2.500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2.500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 800
d(K
Local 2107 41.5
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
ROADWAY FROM/TO
w/o PCH
e/o Propsect Ave.
.Third trot Thu—Strand/Hermosa?
St, cet d+& ' The S
Table 1
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CIRCULATIDN ELEMENT
EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
EXISTING
LENGTH STRIPING/
(miles) GEOMETRICS
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EXISTING ESTIMATED
WIDTH WIDTH PAVEMENT PAVEMENT FUNCTIONAL DAILY AVG. DAILY
' (feet) (feet) TYPE CONDITION + CLASSIFICATION VOLUME CAPACITY++
0.05 2 lanes 39 60 Asphalt) Local
0.07 2 lanes 25 40 Asphalt' Local
0.05- 2 lases 66 60- Senerete toett
1
In JI, RL %ifJ t I,,C Jt, al
Seeenth Street yJ?The 6trand/llcraosa 7
Eighth Street 7j f The Strand/Hermes*
26th Street
The Strand/Hcreosa
0.97 2 lanes
0.08 2lanes-
23rd Street The Strand/Hermosa
r
1pA617. 2111 Street J f? The Strand/leraosa 0.45 2 lanes 12 60 GeneretcLecal 2,500
24th-6treet—FV-P—Ttie4tpan4/lleraosa p n7 ' knot IA 60 Cco«vte , o.,1-24,00—/
Fr/6 60
k7 60
Cone cte
Local
2,500
2,500
800---
:..
GOO—
000
Concrete- Lu ai
2,5 0-
0.02 2 lanes
•t'r
Concrete
loea4 2,500
0.03 2 lanes 16 60 Concrete Local 2,500
17t1, St. crt (pjf) The-Strand/Hermosa
l&th Street Z c..)P The Strand/Neraosa
17th StreetpJ p The Strand/Hermosa
0.02 2 lanes
0_02 21314K
0.10 2 lanes
17 60 Concrete Local 2.500
}tS /d 6a Cancpata Local
16 60 Concrete L0..1 2,500
..kid �6-60 Concrete Local 2,500
11th rtrcet carr 7 The 6t
D"i°t.l
Porter Lane
Morningside Dr./Valley Dr.
Ardmore/Gould Ave.
Circle Court Monterey Bl./Circle Dr.
Aubrey Park Deadends on Aubrey Ct.
Montgomery Dr. • Ocean Dr./Aubrey Ct.
Gould Terrace Ardmore Ave./Gould Ave.
0.15
0.11
1 lane
2 lanes
0.02 1 lane
0.01 2 lanes
0.05 2 lanes
0.17 2 lanes
via
.500-
15 20 Unimproved Local 2,500
23 20-30 Asphalt Local 2,500
30 60 Asphalt Local 2,500
18 25 Asphalt
24 35 Concrete
20 20 Asphalt
Local
Local
Local
2,500
2,500
2,500
Table 1
CITY OF F(F ISA BEACH CIRCULATION ELEMENT
EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
ROADWAY
Marlita
Fifteenth Street
Sixteenth Street
16th Court
Nineteenth Street
24th Place
24th Street
25th Street
26th Street
15th Place
15th Court
17th Street
18th Street
20th Street
EXISTING
LENGTH STRIPING/
GEOMETRICS
FROM/TO (miles)
s/o La Carlita Place 0.04
The Strand/Hermosa Ave.
PCH/Ocean Dr.
Prospect Ave./Harper Ave.
Hermosa Ave./Loma Dr.
Ardmore Ave./PCH
PCH/Prospect Ave.
.5T72A14o NSR A ti
Beach Dr./ rmosa Ave.
Hermosa Ave./Loma Dr.
PCH/Rhodes St.
ST/2/1/0/ /-i/2/2.
Park Ave./Valley Dr.
Ardmore Ave./PCH
The Strand/Hermosa Ave. •
Hermosa Ave./Park Ave.
Park Ave./Valley Dr.
Ardmore Ave./PCH
w/o Hillcrest Dr. (cul-de-sac)
Prospect Ave./Harper Ave.
Hermosa Ave./Park Ave.
Park Ave./Morningside Dr.
Morningside Dr./Valley Dr.
Deadends e/o Ardmore Ave.,S772/414/H/=/2. 4
Hermosa Ave./Manhattan Ave.
Manhattan Ave./Morningside Dr.
g✓MirSTj1A,'o//f!_511. /40./-
Mira
a St./Bonnie Brae
w/o PCH/between Pier Ave. and 16th St.
Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave.
PCN/Prospect Ave.
Deadends e/o Prospect Ave.
srr;afvp/ NPA. 4V
Valley Park nave./Valley Dr.
PCH/Prospect Ave.
srt1/3rua/ HgR,41/4/
Power St./Valley Dr.
PCH/Rhodes St. I
SMANIO(¢(�12, t4V
)
0.09
0.12
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.16
.10
0.08
0.10
0.05
,0 Z
0.18
0.15
0.
0.14
0.02
0.14
0.04
0.08
0.19
0.03
0.14
0.O5
0.04
0.13
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
WA 1 t< Sr
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
WAI-V, 5 % .
2 lanes
2 lanes
1 /./00
/4
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
WAL.I ST
2 lanes
2 lanes
.03 W,L. tk . T.
2 lanes
2 lanes
0.07
0.0I
0.08 2 lanes
0.13
0.11
.10
0.08
0.11
0.11
0.05
2 lanes
2 lanes
VI/V.44 ST.
2 lanes
2 lanes
WALK 51.
2 lanes
2 lanes
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
WIDTH WIDTH PAVEMENT PAVEMENT
(feet) (feet) TYPE CONDIT10N a
24 30 Asphalt
35
25
28
34
30
24
/6
. 16
29
15
/6
24
26
30
25
25
27
25
30
26
24
19
/&O
30
25
66
18
21
20
24
28
23
60
50
40
60
40
40
60
20
60
40
0
50
40
60
60
40
40
40
40
60
60
50
40
60
60
60
40
40
20
40
40
60
40
°6 40
20 30-40
30 40
/6 60
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Concrete
If
Asphalt
Asphalt
Concrete
it
Asphalt
Asphalt
Concrete
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
CUK
Asphalt
Concrete
)A
Asphalt
Asphalt
Concrete
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Aspha t
Asphalt
Concrete
u
EXISTING
FUN)CT I ONAL
CLASSIFICATION
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
t1
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
f.
Local
Local
N
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
(I
Local
Lgcal
Local
Local
,'
EXISTING
DAILY
VOLUME
ESTIMATED
AVG. DAILY
CAPACITY*/
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,530 2,500
2,500 7
2,500
2,500
2,50)
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
7
2,500
2,5200
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2
2,500
2, ,00
2,500
2,500
ROADWAY
22nd Street
27th Court
•
27th Street
20th Place
19th Street
20th Court
19th Court
17th Court
28th Street
29th Street
29th Court
Longfellow Avenue
30th Place
30th Street
Alley n/o 30th St.
3lst Place
31st Street
32nd Place
• 33rd Place
FROM/TO
Prospect Ave./Harper Ave.
LENGTH
(miles)
Table 1
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CIRCILATILN ELEMENT
EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
EXISTING EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
STRIPING/ WIDTH WIDTH
GEOMETRICS (feet) (feet)
0.11 2 lanes
The Strand/Hermosa Ave. 0.04
Hermosa Ave./Petit Ave. MANH/a fj/4/u b ✓ 0.10
Ozone Ct./Morningside Dr. •
Hermosa/Manhattan
Greenwich Village/Morningside Dr.
Harper Ave./Prospect Ave.
Harper Ave./Prospect Ave.
Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave.
Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave.
Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave. .
Hermosa Ave./Valley Dr.
Hermosa Ave./Valley Dr.
Palm Dr./Ingleside Dr.
Hermosa Ave./Valley Dr.
Admore Ave./PCH
Palm Dr./Valley Dr.
Hermosa Ave./Manhattan
Manhattan/Morningside Dr.
Morningside Dr./Ardmore Ave.
Ardmore Ave./Sepuveda Blvd.
Pacific Coast Hwy./ w/o Tennyson Pl.
Palm Drive/Valley Drive
Hermosa Ave./Manhattan
Manhattan/Valley Dr.
Palm Dr./Valley Dr.
Palm Dr./Ingleside Dr.
17
2 lanes
0.10 2 lanes
0.04 1 lane
0.12 2 lanes
0.10
0.12
0.04
0.07
0.08
0.26
0.26
0.23
0.28
0.31
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
1 lane
2 lanes
2 lanes
0.26 2 lanes
0.12
0.05
0.13
0.30
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
2 lanes
0.20 1 lane
0.23 1 lane
0.05
0.23
2 lanes
2 lanes
0.15 I lane
0.22 2 lanes •
27 40
39 80
39 80
13 20
25 40
31 40
25 40
25 40
17 20
20 20
17 20
29 50
25 40
14 15
38 60
32 60
12 15
16 40
25 40
25 40
32 50
10 10
9 10
25 40
26 40
9 10
14 15
PAVEMENT PAVEMENT
TYPE CONDITION .
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Concrete
Concrete
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Asphalt
Concrete
Asph.-Conc.
Asphalt
Concrete
Asph.-Conc.
Concrete
Concrete
Concrete
Asphalt
Concrete
Concrete
Concrete
Concrete
Asph.-Conc.
Asph.-Cont.
EXISTING EXISTING ESTIMATED
FUNCTIONAL DAILY AVG. DAILY
CLASSIFICATION VOLUME CAPACITY.+
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local - 6,3"A 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,670 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 730 2,500
Local 800
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Local 2,500
Table 1
CITY OF IERttOSA BEACH CIRCULATION ELEMENT
EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
EXISTING EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EXISTING ESTIMATED
LENGTH STRIPING/ WIDTH WIDTH PAVEMENT PAVEMENT FUNCTIONAL DAILY AVG. DAILY
ROADWAY FROM/TO (miles) GEOMETRICS (feet) (feet) TYPE CONDITION + CLASSIFICATION VOLUME CAPACITY++
33rd Street Palm Dr./Morningside Dr.
Morningside Dr./Ingleside Dr.
34th Place Palm Dr./Highland Ave.
34th Street Hermosa Ave./Highland Ave.
Highland Ave./Morningside Dr.
0.14 2 lanes 25 40 Concrete Local 2,500
0.08 2 lanes 35 40 Conc.-Asph. Local 2,500
0.09 1 lane 8 10 Asph.-Conc. Local 2,500
0.10 2 lanes 25 40 Concrete Local 2,500
0.05 2 lanes 25 40 Concrete Local 2,500
35th Street Hermosa Ave./Manhattan Ave. 0.04 2 lanes 28 40 Asphalt Loca2,500
Manhattan Ave./Highland Ave. 0.05 2 lanes 25 40 Asphalt Local l 2,500
Highland Ave./Morningside Dr. 0.06 2 lanes 25 40 AsphaltLocal 2,500
18th Court Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave. 0.08 2 lanes 17 20Asphalt Local 2,500
14th Court Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave. 0.08 1 lane 13 20 Asphalt Local 2.500
I 14th Street Hermosa Ave./Manhattan Ave. 0.04 2 lanes 25 60 Asphalt Local 2,500
-F PCH/Prospect Ave. 0.24 2 lanes 25 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
Prospect Ave./East Dead End 0.08 2 lanes 25 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
70 SNAtiVI H,l17M06n Aaf• .O2 two..4 =i9f 2 L'3JBd 39 66 I) it •410" ?
Alley Adj to Pier Loma Dr./Bard St. 0.10 2 lanes 20 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
11th Court Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave. 0.06 1 lane 17 20 Concrete Local 2,500
10th Court Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave. 0.06 2 lanes 17 20 Asphalt Local 2.500
9th Court Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave. 0.06 2 lanes 17 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
0 9th Street Ardmore Ave./Prospect Ave. 0.33 2 lanes 24 40 Asph.-Conc. Local 2,500
Prospect Ave./Reynolds Ln. . 0.18 2 lanes 27 40 Conc.-Asph. Local 2,500
STRAMP / P/P2. AV .0 WALK 6T: /6 6D I, i, .�-» ?
8th Court Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave. 0.05 2 lanes 18 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
"8th Place Ardmore Ave./Prospect Ave. 0.31 2 lanes 24 40 Concrete Local 2,500
7th Street e/o Ardmore Ave. 0.05 2 lanes 25 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
PCH/Prospect Ave. 0.19 2 lanes 24 40-60 Asphalt Local 2,500
Prospect Ave./Reynolds Ln. 0.27 2 lanes 26 40 Conc ete Local 2,500
SrAlA fry / H/S/L 4‘407 \>,/ALt( 5 T. lb 6 D �, f l r
7th Court Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave. 0.05 2 lanes 2 U Kir 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
6th Court Beach Dr./Hermosa Ave. 0.05 2 lanes (6-' 20 20 Asphalt Local 2.500
7th Place Prospect Ave./Reynolds Ln. 0.15 2 lanes 27 40 Concrete Local 2,500
Table 1
CITY OF I€RMOSA BEACH CIRCULATION ELEMENT
EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
EXISTING
LENGTH STRIPING/
ROADWAY FROM/1O (miles) GEOfETRICS
fr/A°G i'? -2114 ----- - ------------------
Street %J /'Ifermosa Ave./Manhattan Ave. 0.04 2 lanes 30 60 A,phol
---------------------
28th Court Palm Dr./Morningside Dr. 8 & 1 lane 12 15
Morningside Dr./Deadend 0.02 1 lane 11 15
0.23 1 lane
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EXISTING ESTIMATED
WIDTH WIDTH PAVEMENT PAVEMENT FUNCTIONAL DAILY AVG. DAILY
(feet) (feet) TYPE CONDITION a CLASSIFICATION VOLUME CAPACITY**
N
agri
29th Court
35th Place
Neptune Ave.
Boundary Place
Palm Dr./Ingleside Dr.
Palm Dr./Manhattan Ave.
Strand/Manhattan Ave.
Ardmore Ave./Pacific Coast Hwy.
Concrete
Concrete
12 15 Asphalt
0.02 1 lane 9 10 Asphalt
0.05 1 lane • 15 25 Concrete
0.31 2 lanes 20 20 Asphalt
NORTH -SOUTH STREETS
Harper Avenue
Vista Drive
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
2,500
2.500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
Artesia Blvd./Ormond 0.35 1 lane 15 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
Aveiation/to s/o llth P1. 0.13 2 lanes 24 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
33rd P1./33rd St. 0.02 1 lane 12 20 Concrete Local 800
Crest Drive 33rd St./35th St. 0.05 2 lanes 20 20 Concrete Local 2,500
Bayview Drive 34th St./35th St. 0.02 1 lanes 12 20 Concrete Local 800
El Oeste Street n/o Gould Ave. 0.10 2 lanes 30 40 Asphalt Local
2,500
Ava Avenue s/o 21st St. 0.10 2 lanes 25 40 Concrete Local 2,500
Springfield Avenue s/o 21st St. 0.11 2 lanes 25 40 Concrete Local 2,500
Prospect Avenue Artesia Blvd./21st St. 0.11 4 lanes 64 80 Asphalt Collector 8,[00 22,000
list St./Aviation Blvd. 0.55 2 lanes 36 80 Asphalt Collector 15,000
Aviation Blvd./Anita St. 0.66 2 lanes 30 80 Cement Collector 17,250 15,000
Alley w/o Prospect Av 6th St to north deadend 0.03 1 lane 10 10 Concrete Local B00
Pacific Coast Highway N. of Artesia Blvd./Artesia Blvd. n/a 3 lanes nb,2 lanes sb wised 74 90 Asphalt Arterial N/A 36,000
(State Route 1) Artesia Blvd./300' S. of Artesia Blvd. 0.06 4 lanes w/led 74 90 Asphalt Arterial 26,000
300' S. of Artesia Blvd./Pier Ave. 0.51 3 lanes nb,2 lanes sb wilt 74 90 Asphalt Arterial- 50,000 36,000
Pier Ave./Heronda St. 0.78 3 lanes nb,2 lanes sb 74 90 Asphalt Arterial . 46,000 36,000
Alley w/o PCH
Alley e/o PCH
Alley e/o PCH
30th St./Gould Ave.
19th St./20th St.
20th St./21st St.
0.18 1 lane 10 10 Concrete
0.02 1 lane 10 10 Concrete
0.04 1 lane 10 10 Concrete
Local B00
Local 800
Local 800
Table 1
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CIRCULATION ELEMENT
EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
EXISTING EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EXISTING ESTIMATED
LENGTH STRIPING/ WIDTH WIDTH PAVEMENT PAVEMENT FUNCTIONAL DAILY AVG. DAILY
ROADWAY FROM/TO (riles) GEOMETRIES (feet) (feet) TYPE CONDITION a CLASSIFICATION VOLUME CAPACITY**
------------------------------------------ --------------------------
Alley e/o FCH 4th St./5th St. 0.06 1 lane 10 10 Concrete Local 800
Alley w/o PCH North and South of 11th St. 0.05 1 lane 10 10 Concrete Local 800
Alley w/o PCH 6th Street to deadend 0.02 1 lane 10 10 Concrete Local 800
Ardmore Avenue Boundary P1./Gould Ave. 0.21 2 lanes 24 30 Asphalt Collector 8,500 15,000
Gould Ave./Pier Ave. 0.74 2 lanes 24 30 Asphalt Collector 7,250 15,000
Pier Ave./8th St. 0.30 .2 lanes 24 30 Asphalt Local 5,150 15,000
8th St./end near 1st St. 0.44 2 lanes 24 40 Asphalt Local 3,200 15,000
Valley Drive Longfellow Ave./Gould Ave. 0.23 2 lanes 24 40 Asphalt Local 9,100 15,000
Gould Ave./Pier Ave. 0.74 2 lanes 24 40 Asphalt Local 6,400 15,000
Pier Ave./8th St. 0.30 2 lanes 24 30 Asphalt Collector 6,800 15,000
8th St./Herondo St. 0.47 2 lanes 24 30 Asphalt Collector 5,550 15,000
22nd Street/ Park Ave./Pier Ave. 0.47 2 lanes 40 BO Asphalt Collector 15,000
Monterey Boulevard Pier Ave./Herondo St. 0.73 2 lanes 40 80 Asphalt Local 7,200 15,000
Manhattan Avenue 1st St. (in Manhattan Beach)/34th St. 0.08 2 lanes 48 80 Asphalt Collector 15,000
"+"' 34th St./27th St. 0.27 2 lanes 30 40 Asphalt Collector 13,200 15,000
W 27th St./Pier Ave. 0.76 2 lanes 40 60 Asphalt Local 5,950 15,000
Pier Ave./1st. St. 0.61 2 lanes 40 60 Asphalt Local 1,300 15,000
Hermosa Avenue 35th St./27th St. 0.36 2 lanes wised 48 90 Asphalt Local 3,700 2,500
27th St./14th St. 0.66 4 lanes w/ned 84 100 Asphalt Collector 13,200 22,000
14th St./10th St. 0.21 4 lanes w/red 80 100 Asphalt Arterial 29,000
10th St./Herondo St. 0.57 4 lanes wised 84 100 Asphalt Arterial 17,550 29,000
Ozone Court 27th St./Loma Dr. 0.16 1 lane 18 20 Asph.-Conc. Local 2,500
Palm Drive
Sunset Drive
Circle Drive
Morningside Dr.
Ingleside Dr.
Highland Ave.
Herondo St./1st St.
1st St./19th St.
19th St./21st St.
21st St./27th St.
27th St./Neptune Ave.
6th St./Pier Ave.
Manhattan Ave./Manhattan Ave.
25th St./Porter Ln.
26th St./33rd St.
28th St./33rd St.
Longfellow Ave./35th St.
0.07 2 lanes 18 20 Concrete Local (alley) 2,500
0.43 2 lanes 18 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
0.13 2 lanes 18 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
0.26 2 lanes 20 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
0.30 1 lane 18 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
0.37 1 lane 18 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
0.05 2 lanes 20 60 Asphalt Local
2,500
0.07 2 lanes 23 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
0.25 2 lanes 25 40 Conc.-Asph. Local 1,640 2,500
0.13 2 lanes 23 40 Concrete Local 2,500
0.07 2 lanes 30 60 Asphalt Local 9,140 15,000
Tablet
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CIRCULATION ELEMENT
EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
EXISTING EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EXISTING ESTIMATED
LENGTH STRIPING/ WIDTH WIDTH PAVEMENT PAVEMENT FUNCTIONAL DAILY AVG. DAILY
ROADWAY FROM/T0 (miles) 6EOMETRICS (feet) (feet) TYPE CONDITION * CLASSIFICATION VOLUME CAPACITYaa
Oceanview Ave.
Hopkins Avenue
Meyer Court
Barney Court
Gravely Court
Pine Street
Ocean Drive
3rd St./5th St.
3rd St./5th St.
s/o and n/o 1st St.
lst St./lst Pl.
s/o 6th St.
5th St./6th St.
Bth St./8th P1.
8th P1./Aviation 81.
Aviation 8I./I4th St.
14th St./15th P1.
Hermosa View Drive s/o 30th St.
1 Braeholm Place s/o 30th St.
Amdy Place s/o 30th St.
Tennyson Place Boundary Av./s/o 30th St.
Alley w/o Tennyson P1 Longfellow/30th St.
La Carlita Place s/o 30th St.
Beach Drive Hermosa/24th St.
Alley e/o Beach Dr. 2Ist St./22nd St.
Culper Court 2nd St./4th St.
Bayview Drive lst St./19th St.
19th St./Circle Dr.
Loma Drive
s/o 6th St. to Pier Ave.
Pier Ave. to n/o 16th St.
s/o 19th St. to Palm Dr.
Cypress Avenue s/o 6th St./n/o Bth St.
llth St./Pier Ave.
1
Bard Street
Alley/11th P1.
0.10 2 lanes
0.09 2 lanes
0.03 2 lanes
0.04 2 lanes
0.01 1 lane
0.05 2 lanes
0.03 2 lanes
0.09 2 lanes
0.13 2 lanes
0.04 2 lanes
0.06 2 lanes
0.06 2 lanes
0.06 2 lanes
0.17 2 lanes
0.04 1 lane
0.04 2 lanes
1.20 1 lane
0.01 1 lane
0.10 1 lane
0.87 I lane
0.01 2 lane
0.42 2 lanes
0.02 2 lanes
0.32 2 lanes
0.16 2 lanes
0.13 2 lanes
0.08 2 lanes
20-25 40 Concrete Local 2,500
28 40 Asphalt 1 Local 2,500
29 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
27 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
20 Concrete Local 2,500
20 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
23 40 Concrete Local 2,500
24 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
19 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
19 20-30 Asphalt Local 2,500
32 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
22 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
20 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
20-30 40-50 Asphalt Local 2.500
10 10 Concrete Local 800
28 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
8-12 10-20 Asphalt Local 2,500
10 10 Concrete Local 800
18 30 Asphalt Local 2,500
15 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
20 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
27 40 • Asphalt Local 2,500
25 35 Asphalt Local 2,500
18 20-35 Asphalt Local 2,500
26 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
25 30-40 Asphalt Local 2,500
44 60 Asphalt Local 2,500
ROADWAY
Hill Street
Cochise Avenue
Valley Park Avenue
1 Power Street
•
Park Avenue
Tablet
CITY OF 1ERMOSA BEACH CIRCULATION ELEMENT
EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
-----------------------
EXISTING EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EXISTING ESTIMA(ED
LENGTH STRIPING/ WIDTH WIDTH PAVEMENT PAVEMENT FUNCTIONAL. DAILY AVG. DAILY
FROM/TO (miles) GEOM€TRlCS (feet) (feet) TYPE CONDITION a CLASSIFICATION VOLUME CAPACITYit
n/o 8th St. 0.05 1 lane 23 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
Ardmore Ave./Second St. 0.07 2 lanes 25 40 Concrete Local 2,500
w/o 4th St. 0.02 1 lane 20 30 Asphalt Local 2.500
s/m 20th St. 0.14 2 lanes 25 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
24th St./20th St. 0.13 2 lanes 25 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
25th St. to Monterey 8). 0.12 2 lanes 30 60 Asphalt Local 2,500
0.11 2 lanes 30 60 Asphalt Local 2,500
Silverstrand Avenue 24th St./26th St.
zb•6f:
24th St./25th-fit.
Gentry Street
Hollowell Avenue
Masiey Avenue
Owosso Avenue
Prospect Ave./6th St.
3rd St./Prospect Ave.
Prospect Ave./7th Pl.
Prospect Ave./3rd St.
3rd St./2nd St.
Prospect Ave./5th St.
0.10 2 lanes 28 60 Asphalt Local 2,500
0.05 4 lanes 28 30-40 Concrete Local 2,500
0.08 4 lanes 28 40 Concrete Local 2,500
0.13 2 lanes 26 40 Concrete Local 2,500
0.03 2 lanes 26 40 Concrete Local 2,500
0.03 2 lanes 28 40 Concrete Local 2.500
0.08 2 lanes 27 40 Asphalt • Local 2.500
9th St./Aviation 131. 0.06 2 lanes 25 40 Concrete Local 2.500
Aviation B1./14th St. 0.11 2 lanes 25 60 Asphalt Local 2,500
Corona Street Aviation B1./Prospect Ave. 0.12 2 lanes 25 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
Bonnie Brae Street Aviation 01./16th St. 0.16 2 lanes 24 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
Campana Street Bonnie Brae St./Prospect Ave. 0.10 2 lanes 30 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
Mira Street 15th P1./16th St. 0.06 2 lanes 19 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
Raymond Avenue 16th St./17th St. 0.05 2 lanes 25 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
Rhodes Street 18th St./21st St. 0.17 2 lanes 20 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
n/o 21st St. 0.05 2 lanes 20 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
Borden Avenue n/o 21st St. 0.05 2 lanes 30 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
Hillcrest Drive 18th St./21st St. 0.18 2 lanes 25 40 Asphalt Local 2.500
21st St/24th St. 0.03 2 lanes 28 Asphalt Local 2,500
Table 1
CITY OF IERMOSA BEACH CIRCUATION ELEMENT
EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
EXISTI)JG EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EXISTING ESTIMATED
LENGTH STRIPING/ WIDTH WIDTH PAVEMENT PAVEMENT FUNCTIONAL DAILY AVG. DAILY
ROADWAY FROM/TO (miles) GEOMETRICS (feet) (feet) TYPE CONDITION * CLASSIFICATION VOLUME CAPACITY**
-------------------------------
Aubrey Court Aviation Bl./Aubrey Pk. 0.06 2 lanes 18 20 Asphalt Local 2,500
Golden Avenue n/o 15th St. 0.10 2 lanes 28 40 Concrete Local 2,500
n/o and s/o 17th St. 0.06 2 lanes 25 40 Asphalt Local 2,500
Silver Street n/o 15th St. 0.07 2 lanes 28 40 Concrete Local 2,500
NOTES: N/A - Not Applicable (outside City boundary)
* To be provided by the City
** Capacity figure represents average daily capacity and is based upon facility type and number of lanes
EXHIBIT E
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 9, 1989
TO: Planning Director Michael Schubach
FROM: City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft
RE: Comments on Draft Circulation, Transportation and Parking
Element of the General Plan
OCT 1 0 iggg
*****************************************************************
Overall, I was quite impressed with the thoroughness of the ele-
ment as prepared by DKS. I have several comments and suggestions
following my review, and am providing them via this memo per your
suggestion.
1. On Page 10, Implementation Policy 1.8, bike grade separa-
tions would be of little value if not coordinated with other
cities. Cost of grade separations would seem to make their
likelihood somewhat remote. This is especially considering
the short distance traveled between stop signs at most cross
streets to the Greenbelt, and the deference paid to pedes-
trians and bicyclists at those crossings.
2. On Page 12, Implementation Policy 3.7, suggest requiring the
use of garages for parking. An easy and valuable way to
encourage this is to require garage door openers on all new'
housing and remodeling. This suggestion coulc' be added to
this implementation policy and then incorporated in our
codes.
3. On Page 24, peak hour warrants are met at Ardmore and Pier
but not indicated at Valley and Pier, which seems to have
the same if not greater traffic volumes.
4. On Page 25, it indicates approximately 900 vehicles travel
entirely through the City on PCH during the afternoon peak
hour. This seems to be a low figure, though possibly is
correct.
5. On Page 32, the study indicates that accidents will be re-
duced and a thousand more vehicles per hour would be able to
use PCH during peak periods if the parking restriction were
implemented. This is not unlike the information we have
received many times from Caltrans and others, i.e., conclu-
sions without justification. The report needs to answer how
these benefits result when the roadway narrows again to two
lanes when entering Redondo Beach.
6. This is a minor item, but on Page 33, under the recommenda-
tions at the top of the page, it indicates Police enforce-
ment should be provided to discourage illegal parking. In
•
our City, parking enforcement is handled by General
Services.
7. On Page 64, there is reference to Lots A, B, and C in the
downtown area. There are other off-street parking lots
owned by the City in or at least near the downtown area that
probably should be referenced here. -
8. On Page 65, the first paragraph needs to be checked for ac-
curacy. The permit cost appears to be in error, and those
eligible to purchase parking permits seems questionable. If
near downtown parking were made available via a shuttle,
perhaps merchants and employees could be required to use the
shuttle by eliminating their eligibility for closer -in
parking.
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
KBN/ld
EXHIBIT F
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael Schubach, Planning Director
FROM: Joan Noon, General Services Director
SUBJECT: Comments to the Circulation Element
DATE: September 27, 1989
1. Annual parking permits cost $25.00.
2. 4 lots missing: Lot "E" - off 3rd Street behind Habash Cafe;
lot "F" at corner of 15th & Beach (part of Biltmore Site may
not want to include); lot "G" off 4th Street east of Pacific
Coast Highway and lot "H" motorcycle lot in 14th behind 7-11.
3. Residential parking permits are also available to merchants
and employees of the district in an annual not monthly basis
- VPD lot permits are available to merchants and employees in
monthly basis.
(A"tt "Pirrni494'`' vziet,c4
13 /6- �,�,c� a�
15.ea-6h /:71
et/e-viatex;71
Gown ,4v€.
a2em, St.AA ems. )12ae,ta444,
A 1pfx ote4tirAit 4111 t411-
4A- a LocA AZfLef itecakzt, —()A.A.i. a -4o
Athtek- , pArii4
-t14(2, � tivGr;detA 4,Le_ tit44k,44,/}4'
felP* frA419140/rai 1 I ro' 0 0 prArAd
/Y-1L4d 1114j -e AtteZ-. 7a-titZ la-r4p3
IC+) ott pa/y)t,t91 e pipvl
SCv‘e:eA4 / L
.r
;l C: IV+ G
1EC 2 1g89
4P-'64
6Fal-12. Ge/rLeAA1 PGS.,
Mayor Roger Creighton, December 22, 1939
City Council Members
Dear Roger,
Over the past month I have taken the opportunity to again review
much of the proposed Circulation Element of Hermosa's General Plan,
especially those sections that relate to removing parking on PCH
during the P.M. rush hours.
A number of concerns were raised at the last City Council meeting.
I would like to comment on them in this letter in order to conserve
your time at the January hearing.
In my September 20, 1989 letter to the Planning Commission
(attached) I responded to questions concerning the possible impact on
available parking for adjacent properties. I still maintain, as did
the 1986 "Economic Impact Study", that any adverse impact would be
minimal. I earnestly suggest that Council members walk, bike or drive
the length of PCH in Hermosa and witness the tremendous changes that
have taken place since 1980. New developments as well as improvements
made by existing businesses have already significantly reduced the
possible adverse impacts of a P.M. parking restriction by providing
necessary off-street parking to adequately meet the businesses' parking
needs. I also believe that a Chamber or City -sponsored survey of busi-
nesses would predictably reflect decade -old perceptions and the inherent
resistance to any change in the parking along PCH - - - perceptions
and an inertia that are clearly inappropriate to the marketplace -
sponsored and City -supported development changes that have taken place
over the past. ten years, and will continue to do so.
Secondly, I maintain that the possibility of a "bottleneck" at
Herondo is more an illusion than a reality. Unlike Hermosa, Redondo
does have a major parallel alternate adjacent to PCH. DKS notes..t,hat ---
25 percent of the southbound traffic already diverts from PCH to
Catalina. Since there would be additional PCH capacity due to the P.M.
parking restriction, in Hermosa, this could result in even more traffic
staying on PCH and diverting to Catalina, thus reducing the current
-==="-spill-over" of traffic into our residential areas. If this causes
concern to Redondo Beach, then so be it! Please remember that --this is
_-=--,the same Redondo that killed the only other possible alternate to PCH
-(Prospect-Flagler.) that was designed to relieve traffic congestion in
our beach cities. And if Redondo implements currently proposed traffic
diversions in its northern area and at Lilienthal/190th, this will -
result in greater commuter traffic demand on Aviation and PCH, causing-'
even more "tough love" grief for Hermosa's residential areas.
The proposal to remove P.M. PCH parking is not being made to
save commuters 3-5 seconds of driving time through Hermosa Beach. I
believe this is a safety issue and this is a sanity issue. DKS analyzes
the traffic safety issues in ,Appendix A (p.p. 9-11). It observes that
Hermosa's accident rate exceeds the statewide average for 4 -lane urban
highways by about ten percent, and that the congestion -related accident
rate for the PCH southbound peak period in Hermosa is 200 percent
greater than the rate for the A.M. northbound peak period. DKS concludes
_S1_
that "parking prohibition on major arterial streets generally reduces
the number of accidents despite an increase in traffic volume due to
the capacity added through the parking prohibition." Cn this basis of
public safety and public convenience, and thus "to limit future
potential tort liability" to the City (Appendix A-1), P.M. rush hour
parking on PCH should be restricted.
I believe the quietude of our residential areas should be a
primary issue in this discussion. Again, Appendix A (p.p. 2-4) and A-1
are highly persuasive. Commuter traffic is going to navigate through
Hermosa Beach one way or another: either on -a major arterial that is
designed to handle it (and could handle it even better by increasing
roadway capacity), or on those residential streets such as Prospect,
Ardmore, Valley and Manhattan that clearly are not designed to do so.
If PCH is handling the A.M. traffic needs relatively well now, where
is that traffic going in the P.M. crunch when there is one-third less
capacity on -PCH? Inglewood Avenue? Get real! Whose "misery", as one
speaker put it at the last Council meeting, are we really talking about?
If commuter life on PCH is miserable now, and it is during the P.M.
peak period, then they will (arel) divert to narrow residential routes
parallel to PCH. As DKS concludes, the proposed parking prohibition
would cause a redistribution of trips from, parallel routes to PCH as
capacity is added, as traffic flow improves and congestion is reduced
along.PCH, and as commuters perceive it to be a more desirable route.
The sanity of our residential areas demands that the Council not allow
the current situation to continue and Worsen by inaction.
Roger, I believe the objectives and implementation policies
contained in the proposed Circulation Element are in large measure
reasonable, workable and necessary.. The Summary (Appendix A, p.p. 13-14)
and the Findings (p.32) clearly identify the resolution of PCH opera-
tional problems as one of the keys to solving many of the other traffic
circulation problems facing our community. Many of the benefits
contained in objectives 2.0 and 4.0, among others, can only be realized
by implementing a P.M. parking restriction program on PCH. I respect-
fully request that the Council implement this recommendation of the
proposed Circulation Elereri"iri a timely fashion,
cc: City Council
Sincerely,
Lance r9 i dm an
Sz
Chairman Geoffrey Rue
and Planning Commission members
City of Hermosa Beach
Dear Geoff,
September 20, 1989
As you may know, I have a long-standing interest in land use
issues that impact our community, traffic flow and congestion being
one such issue. I have reviewed much of the documentation relating
to the proposed Circulation Element revisions, in particular the
question of removing the parking on PCH during the P.M. rush hours.
I believe both the DKS data and our personal experience present
a very persuasive case for pursuing this action. I strongly encourage
the Planning Commission to adopt those implementing policies to
_ restrict peak hour PCH parking, amend the current Circulation Element
the General Plan accordingly, and recommend Council concurrence
:: and City action in a timely fashion. - _
Approximately two years ago' the Planning Commission considered
amending the Circulation Element in order to implement the then -stated
policy goal of restricting parking on the west side of PCH and thus
provide an additional driving lane during the P.M. rush hours. Two
major concerns were raised at that time and were subsequently
discussed by DKS, among others.
First, the impact on available parking for adjacent properties.
DKS reviewed the recent (1986) "Economic Impact Study" in which
Caltrans focused on potential economic impacts to businesses located
along PCH adjacent to the proposed parking restriction zone.(See
Appendix J) The study concluded that, overall, the adverse impact
would be minimal. "There is always an implicit assumption that such
a restriction will adversely affect business activity or sales
volume. This impact perception is more apparent than. real ... Under
conditions of under -utilization of available off-street parking
spaces, front store parking restriction has no adverse effect on
sales a parking restriction can be accommodated in a pattern with
no adverse effect on business activity." Furthermore, empirical
-.observation by Commission members would clearly indicate that, due
both new developments and improvements to available off-street
parking made by existing businesses over the past several years, as
titi*E11 as the positive impact that future developments would have on the
:=availability of off-street parking --- that because of these market
'farces, any adverse effects of a parking restriction would'obviously-_
be extremely limited and highly selective in the short-term, and
virtually insignificant in the long-term. Finally, the City has at its
disposal a variety of actions, including funding mechanisms, that
could be taken, perhaps in cooperation with Caltrans, to mitigate the
short- and long-term impact, if that was necessary.
Secondly, the possibility of a "bottleneck" at Herondo. DK3
addresses this concern, observing that "the southbound volume (of
traffic) on PCH is reduced by 25 percent at Catalina Avenue." For many
residents of south-west Redondo, as well as commuters continuing to
Palos Verdes, Catalina Avenue -is the major parallel alternate to PCH.
Thus, for the foreseeable future, the potential traffic "bottleneck"
at our southern boundary is more illusion than reality because of
the Catalina "diversion". In the long-term, as DKS notes, Caltrans is
securing additional right-of-way dedications in order to widen. FCH to
three lanes in each direction. In the short-term, however, I would
suggest that the Commission concur in the DKS suggestion that the
curb lane be implemented as a through lane in Hermosa, ending in a
right -turn -only lane at Catalina .;venue in Redondo.
Obviously other related issues also need to be reviewed: reduction
of communter traffic on adjacent residential streets, safety/accident
considerations, potential City liability if no action is taken, City
costs, environmental impacts, and the experience of Manhattan Beach
since 1985. Upon review of the available information,.I believe the
reasonable conclusions on these issues are: measurably beneficial,
-substantial improvement/reduction, very real if Hermosa fails to act,
nominal, negligible, and historically proven to be -a sound decision
to effectively control those traffic problems imposed primarily by
residential/commercial growth in surrounding areas.
Geoff, on balance I believe the benefits of the P.M. rush hours
parking restriction do outweigh the few negative impacts. I respect-
fully,request that the Planning Commission amend the General Plan to
include those polices recommended in the proposed Circulation
Element revisions; in particular, those policies that would "implement
a parking re striction program on PCH in the southbound direction
during the evening peak cormute hours." Hopefully, with Council
concurrence, the City would then be able to cooperate with Caltrans
to implement this policy in a timely fashion.
Sincerely,
Lance Widman
1015 4th Street
Hermosa Beach
MINUTS OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of
the C ty of Hermosa Beach, California, held on January 11, 1990,
at the hour of 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Leroy Staten
ROLL CALL
City Council
Present: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton
Absent: None
Staff
Present: Antich, Blackwood, Copeland, Grove, Northcraft, Rooney,
Schubach, Staten, Wisniewski
Absent: None
INTRODUCTION OF STAFF
Acting General Services Director Staten
Acting Community Resources Director Rooney
Public Safety Director Wisniewski
Finance Director Copeland
Personnel Director Blackwood
Planning Director Schubach
Public Works Director Antich
Building Director Grove
CARRY OVER ITEMS FROM JANUARY 9, 1990 COUNCIL AGENDA -
REVIEW OF GOALS v�v73
1. The results of the Staff brainstorming on goals were
reviewed.
2. The Council goals list was then reviewed.
The meeting recessed at 7:15 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 7:30 P.M.2
GOALS LIST (NOT PRIORITIZED)
1. IMPROVE CITY FINANCIAL PICTURE
a. Generate more funds for needed improvement.
b. Improve audit/review procedures for telephone usage.
c. Work with state elected officials to increase city
share of taxes (without conditions beyond program and
with City Council approval.)
d. Study "user -fee" structure.
2. ENHANCE PUBLIC COMMUNICATION AND AWARENESS
a. Establish telephone access to city hall with
human interface and option for direct dial.
b. Improve employees' public relations
- 1 -
c. Publish future agenda items list.
d. Public information system for city hall
e. Participation in "welcome wagon"
f. "Welcome to city" brochure
g. "Welcome to meeting" brochure
h. Establish character generator capabilities from city
hall.
i. Public information program for General Services Dept.
j. Enhance television broadcasting capabilities for
Council Chambers.
Vk. Replay Council meetings on cable television.
1. Expand City newsletter for announcement of city
activities.
Replay meetings on cable television.
n. Display agenda on cable television.
3. EFFECTIVELY UTILIZE CABLE TELEVISION
a. Local access City programming.
b. Community forum on cable television for promoting City.
4. ENHANCE SENSE OF COMMUNITY
a. Improve image of Hermosa Beach
b. More community events.
c. New enforcement policy for parking enforcement and
animal control (issue warning if violator present).
d. Better maintenance of beach bathrooms.
e. Phone etiquette training/standards for employees.
f. Clean-up Council lobby.
g. Make 1990 "Year of the Citizen as Customer".
h. Better public and private medians/landscape within cost
limitations.
5. REVIEW INCREASING POLICE FOOT PATROL DOWN TOWN
a. Consider use of asset forfeiture funds.
6. COMPLETE NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHOOL DISTRICT (SO. SCHOOL
PROP/PROSPECT HEIGHTS).
7. UPGRADE DOWNTOWN
a. Active campaign to clean-up downtown.
b. Implement use -change parking policy'.
c. Incentives for downtown business for facade changes.
7/-70_ d d. Consider closing off Pier Head (Hermosa to Pier) for
pedestrian mall.
e. Look at re-establishing VPD as separate body and
returning Lot A, B, C, to Parking District.
f. Improve property maintenance for downtown businesses.
g. City Council to take more active role with Chamber.
h. Review of Fiesta as to benefit to city vs. dollars
expended.
i. Do something "interesting" with pier (determine legal
limits).
j. Develop "consensus plan" for downtown.
8. REVIEW AUDIT SYSTEM FOR COLLECTION ON PARKING LOTS.
9. BILTMORE SITE RESOLVED AT COUNCIL LEVEL
10. IMPROVE CC MEETING PROCEDURES
a. Provide more opportunity for public to speak
b. Form for public written comments included in brochure.
c. Review other cities processes.
d. Provide better access to agenda packet.
e. Less chat from cc members.
f. Look at ways to avoid late CC meetings (beyond
midnight).
11. IMPROVE CITY INFRASTRUCTURE
a. Analyze more timely completion of sewer upgrade.
b. Analyze service level of street cleaning in city
(toward increasing/making City cleaner).
c. Review need for 4 hr. No Parking restriction for
sweeper.
d. General upgrade of water lines and fire hydrants.
e. Review adequacy of street lighting based upon
complaints.
f. Increase parking and parking requirements
12. REGULAR, EQUAL & STRICT ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS & CUP'S
a. Fire Dept. to include inspection of CUP's during Fire
Code inspections.
b. Establish City liaison with Restaurant Association.
13. IMPROVE QUALITY OF LIFE
a. City beautification (trash enclosure
b. Plant trees.
c. Amortize all CUP's.
14. IMPROVE STAFF ATTITUDE AND MORALE.
a. More social functions between Council and Staff.
(i.e. annual softball/volleyball contest)
b. Increase accountability of staff.
15. CHANGE BUDGET TO MAKE MORE UNDERSTANDABLE TO GENERAL
PUBLIC
a. Clarify goals of CIP budget.
b. Improve understanding of where funds originate.
16. IMPROVE EFFICIENCY/EFFECTIVENESS OF OPERATIONS
a. Increase service level of employees without increasing
staff (compare to other cities).
b. Computerize payroll & personnel function.
c. Increase usefulness and reduce cost of computer system
via master planning.
d. Review cutting cost of parking enforcement and impact of
implementation.
e. Review integrating Police Department Records Management
and computer operations with City computer operations.
f. Reduce delay in Building Department.
g. Analysis of contracting Police, Fire, Parking
Enforcement, Animal Control, and Parks Maintenance
functions.
h. Analysis by Building of costs of consultants vs.
in-house plan check.
i. Review 4/10 schedule for City Hall.
j. Attitude survey of employees
k. Better coordination of City Departments.
1. Expand use of volunteers
m. Evaluate department effectiveness.
n. Search for "cost-effective" improvements for City
departments.
o. New system of management and staff follow-up procedures.
PROCEDURES FOR PRIORITIZING GOALS
1. Council agreed a "bank" of points will be established to
rate each goal.
2. Staff would prioritize the list prior to submitting
goals for Council prioritizing.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Twentieth Street
The adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Thursday January 11,
1990, at the hour of 9:00 P.M.
4
C/(
Chief Deputy ity Clerk
si•
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California held on Tuesday, January 9, 1990 at the
hour of 7:35 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Steve Wisniewski, Public Safety Director
ROLL CALL:
Present: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton
Absent: None
INTRODUCTION OF NEW POLICE OFFICER: Garth Gaines
AND NEW CANINE OFFICER: Le Norbo De La Temerite,(NORBO)
Norbo's Handler/Partner, Officer Tom Eckert gave a talk about his
background and a video was shown displaying Norbo's training.
Officer Eckert also introduced Dr. Garcia, Norbo's veterinarian.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF DONATIONS TO THE CITY FOR CANINE PROGRAM, THE
POLICE D.A.R.E. PROGRAM, NEW BADGES FOR POLICE OFFICERS, AND
DONATION OF TWO SIDEWALK SWEEPERS AND A TRAILER TO PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT. The list of donations was read by Public Safety
Director Wisniewski.
,POLICE K-9 PROGRAM:
Learned Lumber $ 1,200
Los Angeles County Lifeguard Association 100
Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association 1,000
Knights of Columbus (Manhattan Beach) 1,000
Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce 1,000
Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club 1,000
Michael P. D'Amico 100
Wilma A. Burt 50
Normand and Carol Brewer 25
Olguin & Rutherford Development Corporation 100
Matthew D. Cruse 100
C.F. Bergesch Construction Company 500
Sandpipers Philanthrophy 2,000
Olympic Auto Center 200
Triangle Hardware 100
Michael and Patricia Roth 200
Granitize Products, Inc. 250
Autocraft of Torrance 1,633
Burk M. Bussiere 100
John and Mary Ellen Workman 100
Rob Putz 10
Anonymous ' 10
Hermosa Beach Rotary Club 500
Miscellaneous cash donations 150
TOTAL CASH DONATIONS b $11,428
Expenses for the K-9 Program to date ($ 7,061)
Remaining funds for the program $ 4,367
Medical care for the K-9 is being donated free of
charge by the Alondra Animal Hospital in Gardena.
POLICE D.A.R.E PROGRAM:
Cash Contributions Received to Date $ 5,292
Expenses for the D.A.R.E. Program to Date ($ 4,726)
Remaining Funds for the Program $ 566
POLICE DEPARTMENT:
New badges were designed and purchased for the Police
Officers by reserve Police Officer Jack Berkus. This
donation is valued at over $ 5,800.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Betty Martin donated two sidewalk sweepers and a trailer
to the Public Works Department.
CLOSED SESSION - pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)
regarding potential litigation: State Lands Commission regarding
Oil; Real Estate negotiations with Hermosa Beach School District
regarding South School & Prospect Heights; and personnel matters
at the hour of 6:00 P.M.
Present: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Tom Morley - Hermosa Beach
June Williams - 2065 Manhattan
Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place
Marie Horowitz - 531 Pier Avenue
Michael Peaton - 729 Thirtieth
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
(a)
Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations
(a) through (n) with the exception of the following
items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in
order for clarity: (c) Midstokke, (f) Essertier, (k)
Wiemans, and (1) Wiemans.
Recommendation to approve minutes as follows:
1) Adjourned regular meeting of City Council held on
December 9, 1989 at the hour of 12:04 P.M.;
2) Special meeting of the City Council and School Dis-
trict Board of Trustees held at 4 p.m. on December
12, 1989;
3) Regular meeting of the City Council held at 7:30
p.m. on December 12, 1989.
(b)
Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants
Nos. 31924, 32032 through 32238 inclusive, noting voided
warrants 32050 through 32052 inclusive; 32139 through
32141 inclusive and 32159.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
Action: To receive and file
Motion Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered
Recommendation to receive and file the November, 1989
City Treasurer's Report.
Recommendation to adopt resolution relative to the An-
nual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Her-
mosa Beach for the year 1990. Memorandum from City
Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated December 18, 1989.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-5337, entitled, "A
RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE YEAR
1990."
Recommendation to authorize Mayor to sign agreement for
preliminary Engineering Services for Community Center
Electrical Upgrade to John Snyder and Associates at a
cost of $5,880. Memorandum from Public Works Director
Anthony Antich dated December 14, 1989.
Action: To table until the next agenda to allow Coun-
cilmembers to go over additional information requested.
Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered.
Recommendation to approve renewal of lease agreement
between City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel for space
at the Community Center. Memorandum from Acting Com-
munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 28,
1989.
Recommendation to approve requests for Professional
Beach Volleyball Tournaments to be held in Summer 1990
and authorize Mayor to sign contracts. Memorandum from
Acting Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated
December 20, 1989.
Recommendation to confirm depositing of final proceeds
of sale of Seaview property into the 4% UUT railroad
right-of-way acquisition fund, and authorize disburse-
ment from those funds of $3,949 to Coast Mortgage and
Realty Investors. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B.
Northcraft dated December 26, 1989.
(j)
(k)
(1)
(m)
Recommendation to approve additional work on existing
fire alarm system to bring up to current standards at a
cost not to exceed $2,500; authorize staff to purchase
fire equipment, at a cost not to exceed $4,600; reject
all bids received at the June 27, 1989 meeting. Memo-
randum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated
December 6, 1989.
Recommendation to receive and file the following 1988-89
Financial reports:
1) Comprehensive Annual Financial and Audit report,
and
2) Management Letter.
Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated
January 3, 1990.
Action: To continue to the meeting of January 23, 1990.
Motion Wiemans, second Creighton. So ordered.
Recommendation to approve schedule for Environmental
Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, Conditional Use
Permit, and Lease Agreement for oil production. Memo-
randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
January 3, 1990.
Proposed Action: To adopt attached schedule with cor-
rections as necessary.
Motion Creigton, second Sheldon. Objecting: Midstokke,
Essertier, Wiemans. Motion failed.
Action: To send back to staff so City Attorney can make
corrections and/or additions then place on the January
23, 1990 Agenda, on the Consent Calendar.
Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered.
Tom Morley addressed the Council indicating he would
make himself available as an expert at the joint Public
Hearing/Workshop Meeting.
Recommendation to deny the following claims for damages
and refer to the City Attorney:
1) The Vons Companies, Inc., 618 Michillinda Ave.,
Arcadia, CA 91007-1734, filed January 2, 1990; al-
leged failure to repeal Section 30-64 of Ordinance
86-837 (Utility Users Tax);
2) The Vons Companies, Inc. (TVCI), 618 Michillinda
Ave., Arcadia, CA 91007-1734, filed January 2,
1990; alleged failure to process refund for 1988
Utility Users Tax.
Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert A. Blackwood dated
January 2, 1990.
(n)
Recommendation to authorize settlement of claim filed
January 3, 1990 by Brian C. Rumble, for damage to his
vehicle, in an amount not to exceed $4,500. Memorandum
from Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated January 4,
1990.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
Items (c), (f), (k), and (1) were discussed at this time
but are listed in order for clarity.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC None
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.
5. DRAFT CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING ELEMENT OF
THE GENERAL PLAN. (Continued from December 12, 1989
meeting.) Two Memorandums from Planning Director
Michael Schubach dated January 2, 1990 and January 8,
1990. Supplemental letters from: Tina Winter, dated
January 4, 1990; Elli & John Horne, dated January 8,
1990; and Violet Isgreen, dated January 9, 1990.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
Michael Meyer, representing DKS Associates presented a
status report.
A recess was called at 9:15 P.M.
TheeMeeting reconvened at 9:26 P.M.
The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak
were:
Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste - read a letter from Joanne
Rectors, 615 Gould
Jim Doty - 640 Gould
Emily Mager - 451 Gould
Clifford & Karen Peer - 662 Gould
Patrick Killen - 652 Gould
Shirley Kane - 531 Pier Avenue
Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street
Mary Anne Boyle - 142 Monterey
Bill Sniff_- 142 Monterey
Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place
Jan Carcher - 162 Monterey
Wanda Smith - 144 Monterey
Lance Widman - 1015 Fourth Street
Wesley Bush - Secretary of -Chamber of Commerce
Jerry Compton - 200 Pier & 832 Seventh Street
The City Council took straw votes on the following items:
ISSUE
YES NO
Eliminate parking lane and add southbound lane along
Pacific Coast Highway during peak hour traffic. 0
5
Add "no left turn" signs, as determined appropriate
by staff, along Pacific Coast Highway to improve
traffic flow. 1
Essertier
4
Widening of eastbound/westbound approaches at
Prospect/Artesia to provide additional capacity.
0 5
Signalize following intersections:
1. Gould/Valley/Ardmore
2. Pier/Valley/Ardmore
3. Ardmore/21st Street
4. Hermosa/8th Street
5. Manhattan/27th/Greenwich Village 0 5
Eliminate street parking along east side of Ardmore
for 80 feet prior to side streets - 3rd, 4th, 5th,
6th and 7th for safety sake. 0 5
Study widening of Ardmore from Pier Ave. to 2nd St.
in near future, and from 2nd St. to 1st St. after
the completion of recently approved development. 0 5
Reclassify the following streets from local to
collector based on traffic volume:
1. Valley Drive (Pier to north border)
2. Ardmore Avenue (Pier to 2nd St.)
3. Highland (Longfellow to north border)
4. Longfellow (Ardmore to Manhattan Ave.) 2
Creighton
Sheldon
3
Cul-de-sac 4th St. just west of Ardmore; connect
5th St. to 3rd St. west of Ardmore as alternative
(see figure 12) Parking for Ardmore east side. 0 5
One-waying of streets in general
0 5
Gould Avenue. changed from collector to local
street designation.
5 0
Prohibit left hand turn at peak traffic hours onto
Prospect southbound from Aviation Blvd. 0 5
Bike path along the greenbelt. 0 5
Create limited truck routes along the following:
1. Gould Ave. (P.C.H. to Morningside
2. 27th St. (Morningside to Greenwich Village)
3. Hermosa Ave. (Greenwich Village to Pier Ave.)
4. Manhattan Ave. north City limit to 27th St. 0 5
Providing a parking structure downtown to enhance
business possibly on northwest corner Manhattan/
Pier Ave. north City limit to 27th St.
5 0
Provide residential parking structures to elevate
parking deficiency in some neighborhoods.
0 5
Planning Commission request to change title "non-
residential" to "commercial" on page 71.
5 0
Traffic intrusion on Monterey/two-way traffic on
Valley between 2nd and Herondo (Refer to Exhibit
"C11)
5 -"b
study ok
Angle parking on Hermosa Ave. to improve parking
and create bicycle lane.
(study ok)
3 2
Midstokke
Essertier
The staff was directed to prepare a Resolution reflecting the
straw votes on the above matrix items, for approval at the
January 23, 1990 meeting on the Consent Calendar.
A recess was called at 11:10 P.M.
The Meeting reconvened at 11:27 P.M.
6. INTERIM ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE 17
FT. SETBACK THE PROVISION OF FOUR PARKING SPACES, AND TO
WAIVE THE 17 FT. SETBACK FOR CERTAIN SMALL LOTS AND LOTS
ON NARROW ALLEYS. Memorandum from Planning Director
Michael Schubach dated January 2, 1990. An alternate
Ordinance was submitted by Michael Schubach dated
January 9, 1990.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak
were:
Chris Coppersmith - 3133 The Strand
Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street
Mike Sanders - 441 Thirty-first Street
Keith Reeves - 429 First Street
Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place
June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue
Jerry Compton - 837 Seventh Street
Kari Person - 332 Thirty-first Street
John Thomas - 335 thirty-first Street
Joanne Bland - 2728 The Strand
Jan Coppersmith - 3133 The Strand
Bob Strokke - 3205 The Strand
Action: To direct staff to prepare a Resolution of In-
tent, incorporating Council and Citizen comments with
special attention to 30' x 70' lots, narrow alleys,
turning radius and then bring back on the Consent Calen-
dar at next meeting, January 23, 1990.
Motion Midstokke, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting
the objection of Wiemans.
Final Action: To amend motion to Receive and File and
direct City Manager to expedite.
Motion Midstokke, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting
the objection of Wiemans.
7. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD GYMNASIUM/HEALTH AND FITNESS CEN-
TER TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST FOR THE C-2 ZONE, WITH
ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning
Director Michael Schubach dated January 2, 1990.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach
The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak
were:
Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street
John Warren - 1120 Hermosa - submitted a petition w/600
signatures for other than a retail store at site.
Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1022.
Motion Essertier, second Sheldon. So ordered.
Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No.
90-1022, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE TO ADD GYMNASIUM/HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER AS
A PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2, RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL ZONE,
WITH A CONDITINAL USE PERMIT, AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING
STANDARDS FOR SAID USE AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRON-
MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION."
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton.
AYES: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor
Creighton
NOES: None
8. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO GRANT A MASTER
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTO AGENCIES, INCLUDING
STORAGE AND SALES OF PARTS AT 2771, 2851, 2901 AND 3001
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, VASEK POLAK AUTO DEALERSHIPS.
Councilmembers Kathleen Midstokke and Albert Wiemans,
appellants. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated January 2, 1990. Supplemental letter
from James Deutsch representing Citizen Concern Group of
30th Street, dated January 8, 1990.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak
were:
Jerry Compton - 200 Pier Avenue, representing Vasek
Polak
James Deutsch - 707 Thirtieth Street
Jim Shad - 737 Thirtieth Street
Larry Bryant - 2960 LaCarita Place
Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street
James Lissner - 2715 El Oeste
Michael Peaton - 729 Thirtieth Street
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-5338, entitled, ',A
RESOLUTION AFFIRMING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO
GRANT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTOMOBILE AGENCIES,
INCLUDING STORAGE AND SALES OF PARTS AT 2775, 2851, 2901
AND 3000 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS
NORTH 50.0 FEET OF LOT A, TRACT 1594 PLUS LOTS 124
THROUGH 127 INCLUSIVE, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CONVENTION
HALL AND MARINE VIEW PARK TRACT."
Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered, noting
the absence of Sheldon.
Final Action: To make the following amendments to the
Master Conditional Use Permit:
1. Condition #5 - make clear that there is to be no
washing of vehicles in the street, only on the
premises.
2. Condition #6 - Add, "vehicles used in conjunction
with the businesses are allowed in an approved
location; to be reviewed by the Planning Director."
3. Condition #9 - Amend to include "..as determined by
the Planning Commission..." following the words
"adequate on-site parking spaces".
4. Condition #12 - Amend to say, "fire lane shall be
painted and identified by painted sign on the
pavement."
5. Condition #13 - Change to read, "parking or stopping
on the public right-of-way for the delivery of parts
or vehicles to the subject property shall be
prohibited."
6. Condition #14 - Change by deleting third sentence
that starts "no auto repair..." and ends, "..windows
are closed".
7. Condition #15 - Sound Proof changed to Sound wall
8. Conditions 23 & 25 - Change time limit in both from
from February 6, 1990 to February 20, 1990.
9. Add a sentence "E" to the first page of the Planning
Commission Resolution that reads, "the City acknow-
ledges that the dealerships involved are three (3)
separate and distinct auto agencies and are grouped
together under the Conditional Use Permit because of
their contiguous proximity and common ownership.
Motion Creighton, second Esertier. So ordered, noting
the absence of Sheldon.
Councilmember Sheldon left the dias at 2:05 A.M.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
9. PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON VALLEY. DRIVE BETWEEN GOULD AND
HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL. Supplemental information from
Joe Mark submitted, January 9. 1990. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Anthony Antich, dated January 2,
1990. Supplemental letter from Margaret Harrell, dated
January 9, 1990.
A. Sight distance at 24th Street and 24th Place.
B. Consideration of Bikeway on Valley Drive.
This item was continued to the January 23, 1990 meeting.
10. CONSIDERATION OF ADJUSTMENT TO PARK AND RECREATION IN -
LIEU FEE, WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION. Memorandum from
Building and Safety Director William Grove dated Decem-
ber 26, 1989.
This item was withdrawn prior to the meeting.
11. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT ON RAMIFICA-
TIONS OF WITHDRAWAL FROM CDBG. Memorandum ,from City
Attorney Charles S. Vose.
This item was continued to the January 23, 1990 meeting.
12. RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT EMPLOYER/EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION
RELATIONS RESOLUTION. Memorandum from Personnel Direc-
tor Robert Blackwood dated January 1, 1990.
This item was continued to the January 23, 1990 Meeting.
13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
This item continued to the January 23, 1990 Meeting.
14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
This item continuted to the January 23, 1990 Meeting.
15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
(a)
(b)
(c)
Request by Councilmember Midstokke for discussion of
allowable uses in the open space zones. (Continued from
December 12, 1989 meeting.) Memorandum from Planning
Director Michael Schubach dated December 4, 1989.
This item was continued to the January 23, 1990 Meeting.
Request by Councilmember Midstokke for discussion of
rezoning and disposition of the Biltmore site. (Con-
tinued from December 12, 1989 meeting.)
This item was continued to the January 23, 1990 Meeting.
Request by Councilmember Wiemans for discussion of
requiring conditional use permit for new commercial
developments such as hotels. (Continued from December
12, 1989 meeting.)
This item was continued to the January 23, 1990 Meeting.
(d) Request by Councilmember Sheldon for discussion re.
zoning standards in residential zones, i.e., lot
coverage, parking, setbacks, etc.; and height limit,
setbacks, parking and bulk in commercial zones. (Con-
tinued from December 12, 1989 meeting.)
This item was continued to the January 23, 1990 Meeting.
d
CITIZEN COMMENTS - None
ADJOURNMENT
The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California adjourned on Wednesday, January 10, 1990, at
the hour of 2:40 A.M.; to a Special Meeting to continue Goal
Setting discussions, to be held on January 11, 1990 at the hour
of 6:00 P.M.
V6-1
hief Depu y City Clerk
.y
b
V
to
V
fYr
V
9,
4'
y, 4
4
4
Iv
V
•
•
42
54
54
55
55
z
r
9
3
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE--SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90
PAGE 0001
DATE 01/22/90
3
1
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
1
CAPIO 00367 001-400-1205-4316 00059 $30.00
09968
32241
01/18190
SEM REG/M. TERCERO 01/11/90 CABLE TV /TRAINING
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $30.00
30.00
H ' HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00325 $207,888.90
32049
5
PAYROLL/12-16 TO 12-31 01/03/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00326 $268,992.50
$0.00
01/18/90
32243
+
PAYROLL/01-01 TO 01-15 01/17/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 105-202-0000-2030 00180 $5,676.14
$0.00
01/18/90
32049
PAYROLL/12-16
TO 12-31 01/03/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 110-202-0000-2030 00181 $49,310.68
$0.00
01/18/90
32049
PAYROLL/12-16 TO 12-31 01/03/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 145-202-0000-2030 00176 $1,670.62
$0.00
01/18/90
32049
PAYROLL/12-16 TO 12-31 01/03/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 155-202-0000-2030 00177 $2,475.85
$0.00
01/18/90
32049
PAYROLL/12-16 TO 12-31 01/03/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 160-202-0000-2030 00175 $7,295.54
PAYROLL/12-16
$0.00
01/18/90
32049
TO 12-31 01/03/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 170-202-0000-2030 00031 $12,747.80
$0.00
01/18/90
32049
PAYROLL/12-16 TO 12-31 01/03/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 705-202-0000-2030 00138 $10,645.52
$0.00
01/18/90
32049
PAYROLL/12-16 TO 12-31 01/03/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
**.x VENDOR TOTAL**********************+•********************************************* $566,703.55
,
$0.00
01/18/90
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 00317 001-400-1201-4317 00206 $135.00
00284
32242
CONF REG/K. NORTHCRAFT 01/17/90 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $135.00
$0.00
01./18/90
e
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00363' $69,619.54
32240
c
RETIREMENT ADVANCE/DEC89 01/09/90 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT
$0.00
01/18/90
5
7
7
7
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
2
,3
141
15
15
,7
18
19
20
2,
z2
2_
24
25
25
27
2ft
lu
31
32
33
34
35
5)
J
J
11
J
4
=e
4
0,
5
5
0
2
5
e
J
J
d
4
U `
2
3
:40
•
•
:1
n
51
:3
]4
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90
PAGE
DATE:
0002
O1/?_2/90
CHK #
DATE EXP
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF' PO 4
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
*** VENDOR TOTAL •************it*tt+t#•n•#****** ****•teas.•*•*•a•******************ia************ $69.619.54
32239
H STEVE*WISNIEWSKI 01364 170-400-2103-4322 00017 ' $428.00
10705
REIMB NARCOTICS FUNDS 01/08/90 SPEC INVESTGTNS /UNCLASSIFIED
*** VENDOR TOTAL*******************•p*********************•*************************** $428.00
$0.00
01/18/90
*** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $636,916.09
R LUIS*AREA 03207 001-210-0000-2110 03486 $100.00
88827 10509
32247
01/18/6-
___
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 88827 01/12/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
*** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************************•*********** $100.00
$0.00
R ADAMSON UNIFORM EQUIP. CORP. 00138 001-400-2101-4306 00746 $111.02
5159 00012
32240
MISC CHARGES/JAN 90 5159 01/15/90 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE
R ADAMSON UNIFORM EQUIP. CORP. 00138 001-400-2101-5402 00049 $2,377.03
$0.00
4783 00130
01/18/^0
32248
RADAR GUNS/SUPPLIES 4783 12/13/89 POLICE /EQUIP—MORE THAN $500
*** VENDOR TOTAL************************+e******************************************* $2,488.05
$2,371.54
01/18/90
R ADVANCE ELEVATOR 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00355 $80.00
22854 00003
32249
L VATOR MAINT/JAN 90 22854 01/01/90 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $80.00
$0.00
01/18/90
R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 00935 001-400-2101-4307 • 00204 $393.85
3181 09662
32250
CELLULAR PHONE ANTENNA 3181 12/29/89 POLICE /RADIO MAINTENANCE
R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS ,00935 110-400-3302-4307 00009 $305.50
$390.15
03460 00073
01/18/90
32250
1
RADIO MAINT/JAN 90 03460 01/01/90 PARKING ENF /RADIO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $699.35
$0.00
01/18/90
R RAY*ALLEN 03181 001-400-2101-4187 00314 $230.18
2550 10167
32251
1
1
BITE SLEEVES/COVERS/K-9 2550 11/21/89 210005 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
$218.27
01/18/90
10
•
2
4
5
16
v
ID
0
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
3'
32
3
3
35
3
3
3
,
2
6
C
•
3
4
9
0
4
5
6
0
2
3
5
3
41.
w
I,
10,
OP
0
3:
,1
42
43
44
47
40
40
`.0
5,
53
54
55
16
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90
e
PAGE
DAZE
0003
01/22/90
CHR #
DATE EXP
•
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #,
AMOUNT UNENC
*** VENDOR TOTAL ************************* •*iF************** est****************•r.•*•tt***** $230.18
32252
R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 00745 $57.00
00123
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******at;t*tti?•*•n•tt*+tit********stn*• ***ate•tt•p•3txn•tit********-n•jttt********* •a****te• $57.00
$0.00
01/18/90
R HAROLD*ANCHEL r 03174 001-210-0000-2110 03485 $375.00
82580
10506
32253
WORK GUAR DEPOSIT REFUND 82580 01/12/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $375.00
$0.00
01/18/90
R APOLLO LEASING COMPANY LTD 02558 001-400-3104-6900 00034 $841.29
00066
32254
LEASE PMT/FEB 1990 01/15/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS
*** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************it*tt**************** $841.29
$0.00
01/18/90
R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-2201-4309 00803 $43.00
00017
32255
UTILITY RAGS SERV/DEC 89 12/31/89 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-3104-4309 00387 $16.25
$0.00
00017
01/18/90
32255
01/18/90
32255
UTILITY RAGS SERV/DEC 89 12/31/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-4204-4309 01544 $141.18
$0.00
00017
UTILITY RAGS SERV/DEC 89 12/31/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-4205-4309 00438 $38.25
$0.00
00017
01/18/90
32255
UTILITY RAGS SERV/DEC 89 12/31/89 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 110-400-3302-4309 00634 $12.03
$0.00
00017
01/13/90
32255
UTILITY RAGS SERV/DEC 89 12/31/89 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $250.71
$0.00
09143
01/10/90
32256
e
,
R ASPA 00953 001-400-1201-4315 00056 $75.00
DUES/K. B. NORTHCRAFT 01/11/90 CITY MANAGER /MEMBERSHIP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $75.00
$0.00
01/18/90
f
ft AUTOMOTIVE PAINT CENTER 01891 001-400-3104-4309 00386 $327.36
7761
00124
32257
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 7761 12/31/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$0.00
01/18/90
• .
1
2
3
4
7
6
0
0
10
11
1a
15
1R
1J
6
1
.ir
y
1
I0 0111
20
1
22
41.
z5
C
27 Jr
2
2
31 j
l
5
3,
2
4
J
J►
1 .'
7
6
2
r y
7 41/
11
1 4
2
f
4
5
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1
2
3
FINANCE—SFA34O DEMAND LIST PAGE 0004
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90 DATE 01/22/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
]
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
e
fl
C
10
*** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************•*******************4t*********** $327. 36
12
2
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY 00407 001-400-1206-4201 00660 $148.15 7471 09958 32258
15
10
CHANGE COMPUTER RM LOCKS 7471 11/13/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/90
17
14
19
AVIATION LOCK & KEY 00407 001-400-2101-4305 01160 $39.50 00125 32258
19
:0
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/18/90
21
22
'n
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY 00407 001-400-4601-4305 00781 $12.54 00125 32258
23
24
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/18/90
2;
26
21
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************at#tail*
27
****10-#;tiFiatF********t7at•ta•u* #ta**4* $200. 19
20
27
37
EILEEN*BALINAO 03208 110-300-0000-3302 31153 $106.00 853191 09289 32259
31
32
CITATION OVERPMT REFUND 53191 01/11/90 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 01/18/90
3
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $106.00
34
31.
3
37
3r
3o
R BANC ONE LEASING 99 02154 001-400-4205-6900
36
00052 $417.96 00054 32260
4.
:
LEASE PAYMENT/FEB 90 01/15/90 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 01/18/90
01
42
,'
**# VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
41
1
$417.96
44
4:
l3
46
3^
R BANK OF AMERICA 00180 001-400-1201-4305 00151 $25.90 09144 32261
47
40
DEC EXP/K. NORTHCRAFT 12/31/89 CTY MANAGER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/18/90
4'J
,0
50
3,3
DANK OF AMERICA 00180 001-400-1203-4201 00643 $88.62 09783 32261
51
33,
DEC EXP/R. BLACKWOOD,, 12/31/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/90
53
54
a2
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $114.52
;e
43
57
A
50
45
R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY,
59
02509 001-400-1101-4305 00295 $16.38 01249 32262
60
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/18/90
61
II
62
n
R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509
001-400-1207-4305 00186 $23.6863
01 x.49 32262
04
13
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 BUS LICENSE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/18/90
65
f9
51
R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 001-400-2101-4305 01161 $42.66 01249 3-22 2 6�
07
60
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/18/90
12
F•"
7701 ]1
72
55
73
0
74
556
75
76,
1
•
1
40
r
V
V
1
.1,
A
a
4
4
51
53
sA
55
* 76
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:40:55
2
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/23/90
PAGE 0005
DATE 01/22/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
R
BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY
02509
001-400-4601-4305 00782
$16.01
01249
32262____
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
COMM RESOURCES
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL*##*********tr*ir*tr*tttrtr*tr**tt***##****#it*it*****#tttt***** ttt*##**it******at# $98. 73
R
' BEACH TRAVEL
00252
001-400-2701-4316 00026
$113.00
TR278
00278
32263
AIRFARE/K. MITCHELL TR2.78
01/15/90
CIVIL DEFENSE
/TRAINING
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL **tato************arta**♦tar*****artrarattt*#*atit***alt****ft*tris# itir*tt#aRit-******* $113.00
R
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
01308
001-400-1212-4188 01620
$78.04
00055
32264
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
EMP BENEFITS
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
01308
145-400-3401-4188 00828
$0.69
00055
32264
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
DIAL A RIDE
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
01308
145-400-3402-4188 00830
$0.27
00055
32264
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
ESEA
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $79.00
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
01293
001-400-1212-4188 01619
$14,128.33
00056
32265
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
EMP BENEFITS
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
01293
110-400-3302-4188 01095
$677.06
00056
32265
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
'PARKING ENF
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
01293
145-400-3401-4188 00827
$17.0800056
32265
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
DIAL A RIDE
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
01293
145-400-3402-4188 00829
$6.83
00056
32265
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
ESEA
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
01293
705-400-1209-4188 00196
$125.42
00056
32265
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
LIABILITY INS
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
OL/18/90
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
01293
705-400-1217-4188 00195
$236.93
00056
32265
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
WORKERS COMP
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
* * VENDOR TOTAL ******art*♦tat***********at************at*********at******* ************** $15,191.65
R
BRAUN LINEN SERVICE
00163
001-400-2101-4306 00744
$153.00
70664
00128
32266
PRISONER LAUNDRY/DEC 89 70664
12/31/89
POLICE
/PRISONER MAINTENANCE
$0.00
01/18/90
2
a
4
5
6
7
a
10
11
12
13
14
15
IG
140
y
.r
41,
n
16
19 y
20
22
22 JI
24
23
26
27 ✓
41
42
7 ✓
a
0
1,.
2
3
5 40
6
6
9 40
s
7
R
3
rr
4110
•
•
41
42
13
44
45
I`
2
3
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
to
'7
IB
19
70
21
22
23
24
70
27
2n
30
31
32
33
34
35
3f.
3
3
9
43
f4
,s
,6
17
19I
)III
sol
1
s2
4
5
se
s0
511
r)
,2
93
94
7
n
10
]1
72
73
4
5.
4
J
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:40:55
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/23/90
PAGE 0006
DATE 01/22/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/RE_F PO #
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR
R
TOTAL ******4***nes•*******#•n•at************•x**********************#********** 3153. 00
00005
32267
BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES
00155
001-400-1208-4201 00616
$608.98
R
TRASH T WUP/JAN 90
BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES
01/01/90
00155
GEN APPROP
110-400-3301-4201 00244
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$516.63
80.00
00005
01/18/90
32267
TRASH PICKUP/JAN 90 01/01/90 . VEH PKG DIST
*** VENDOR TOTAL *****gat****i<****************************its*********************
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
.**** 81, 125. 61
30.00
01/18/90
R
BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES
00158
001-400-3103-4201 00256
$2,796.84 891200-0037002
00004 32268
$0.06---01/13/90----
0.0001/18/90I
,
DUMP CHARGES/DEC 89 37002 12/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
a** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************pit*********************** 32, 796. 84
R
BSI CONSULTANTS, INC.
00630
001-400-4201-4201 00241
$1,025.70 1497
07554
32269
R
PLAN CHECKS/BUILDING 1497
BSI CONSULTANTS, INC.
09/11/89
00630
BUILDING
001-400-4201-4201 00242
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$520.00 1497
$834.84
07599
01/18/90
32269
R
PLAN CHECKS/BUILDING 1497
BSI CONSULTANTS, ' INC.
09/11/89
00630
BUILDING
001-400-4201-4201 00243
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$297.44 1497
$0.00
07 564
01/18/90
32269
R
PLAN CHECKS/BLDG 1497
BSI CONSULTANTS, INC.
09/11/89
00630
BUILDING
001-400-4201-4201 00244
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$358.28 1497
3291.00
07557
01/18/90
32269
R
PLAN CHECKS/BUILDING 1497
BSI CONSULTANTS, INC.
09/11/89
00630
BUILDING
001-400-4201-4201 00245
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$407.42 1577/1497
$366.38
07563
01/18/90
32269
R
PLAN CHECK FEES/BLDG\ /1497
BSI CONSULTANTS, INC.'
10/12/89
00630
BUILDING
001-400-4201-4201 00246
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$1,139.96 1577
$404.24
07566
01/18/90
32269
R
PLAN CHECKS/BLDG 1577
BSI CONSULTANTS, INC.
10/12/89
00630
BUILDING
001-400-4201-4201 00247
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$1,129.18 1577
$857.48
07572
01/18/90
32269
01/18-----
/90
ESTIMATED PLAN CHECK FEE 1577 10/12/89 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $1,078.11
*** VENDOR TOTAL •ir**•rF***at*n*ar* *• *•n**#te•*•x•*#***#*##ir#•p•******#at**#*attr •*tt****•a•tF•#at##*tt•x• $4,877.98
R
BUCKALTER, NEMER, FIELDS &
03151
001-400-1131-4201 00542
$5,619.18 522784
09140
32270
RROW TITL.E SERV/OCT—NOV 22784
11/30/89
CITY ATTORNEY
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00
01/18/90
I`
2
3
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
to
'7
IB
19
70
21
22
23
24
70
27
2n
30
31
32
33
34
35
3f.
3
3
9
43
f4
,s
,6
17
19I
)III
sol
1
s2
4
5
se
s0
511
r)
,2
93
94
7
n
10
]1
72
73
4
5.
4
J
b
'
Nr
V
tr,
4
4
5C
5,
54
56
imo
e
�
6
Y
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90 '
PAGE
DATE
0007
01/22/90
CHK #
DATE EXP
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ It ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
1
=
*** VENDOR TOTAL **************************** t********stat*****it************ t** t ******* $5,619.18
R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599 001-400-3101-4201 00034 $3,150.00
00061
32271
+
5
PARKS MAINT/DEC 89 12/31/89 MEDIANS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599 001-400-6101-4201 00171 $10,025.62 1
PARKS
$0.00
00061
01/18/90
32271
MAINT/DEC 89 12/31/89 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********te,*******************t **********- ****- *********************** $13,175.62
$0.00
01/10/90
R CALIFORNIA JOB JOURNAL 03143 001-400-1203-4201 00644 $62.12
09780
32272
01/18/90
EMP ADS/PLANNER 12/25/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL*************************iF•****#************************ tette********** $62.12
$0.00
__ R __ CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 00262 001-400-1121-4305 00133 $36.96
NAMEPLATES/E.
27670 09327
32273
01/18/90
DOERFLING 27670 01/04/90 CITY CLERK /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $38.96
$25.02
R CAMPBELL ENTERPRISES 03180 001-400-2401-4309 00139 $183.78
7329 09940
32274
01/18/90
;
LEASHES/ANIMAL CONTROL 7329 01/01/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $183.78
$183.78
R CANADA LIFE 00046 001-400-1212-4188 01613 $735.30
00008
32275
_
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $735.30
$0.00
01/18/90
R CANADA LIFE002 39 001-400-1212-4188 01623 $2,960.72
00022
_ L
c
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R CANADA LIFEL
00239 105-400-2601-4188 OOBB8 $99.63
$0.00
00022
32276
01/18/90
32276
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R CANADA LIFE 00239 110-400-3301-4188 00839 $4.15
$0.00
00022
01/18/90
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 - VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
32276
01/18/90
6
3
7
0
0
,
3
5
6
9
0
4
.5
2
0
,
3
0
3
4
6
y
J
J
j
J
<%
2,u
e V
3'
)
f,
4
S3
44
45
(
5,
53
54
55
2
3
7
n
4
e
5
.3
4
5
.7
6
3'
3
4
7
4
0
3
0
7
T
4
5
6
7
y
a
fl
4
a
0
•
;r
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90
PACE 0008
DATE 01/22/90____
PAY VENDOR NAME VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ ft ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
PO 8 CHK 0
UNENC DATE EXP
R CANADA LIFE 00239 110-400-3302-4188 01097 $573.94
00022 32276
$0.60 01/19/90
00022 32276
$0.00 01/18/90
00022 32276
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R CANADA LIFE 00239 145-400-3401-4188 00831 $5.16
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 ffTAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R CANADA LIFE 00239 145-400-3402-4188 00833 $1.76
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
8 CANADA LIFE ; 00239 145-400-3403-4188 00230 $1.95
CITY HEALTH
___
$0.00 01/16/90
00022 32276
INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R CANADA LIFE 00239 155-400-2102-4188 00465 $14.45
$0.00 01/1B/90
00022 32276
CITY HEALTH INS/FED 90 01/15/90 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R CANADA LIFE 00239 160-400-3102-4188 00830 $94.78
____ _ _ __
$0.00 01/18/90
00022 32276
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R CANADA LIFE 00239 705-400-1209-4188 00199 $17.77
$0.00 01/18/90
00022 32276
1
•
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90• 01/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R CANADA LIFE 00239 705-400-1217-4188 00198 $6.31
$0.00 01/18/90
00022 32276
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL ##*****########################**##*## *** ***##**4--n#***#x****#**# $3,780.62
$0.00 01/18/90
R J. I.#CASE CREDIT CORP. 01147 160-400-3102-6900 00104 $748.32
00021 32277
LEASE PAYMENT/FEB 90 01/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /LEASE PAYMENTS
*** VENDOR TOTAL############-a#ir########at######at**at##########################n##-tt#### $748.32
$0.00 01/18/90
R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 001-400-2101-4305 01159 $38.11
1649
01211 32278
MISC. CHARGES/DEC 89 1649 12/31/89 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************4************************** $38.11
$0.00 01/18/90
;
R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2101-4311 00787 $132.36
•
00112 32279 f
MISC CHARGES/DEC—JAN 01/15/90 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2401-4311 00170 $14.91
$0.00 01/18/90
00112 32279
MISC CHARGES/DEC—JAN 01/15/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE
$0.00 01/18/90
7
2
3
7
n
4
e
5
.3
4
5
.7
6
3'
3
4
7
4
0
3
0
7
T
4
5
6
7
y
a
fl
4
a
0
•
3
4
4At,
4"
4
4.
.1
5
54
55
56
..• v.*, 4. wt,.,,, w +yM'l .4 W.Yw- , .1. lMw �. , ..
4s5-. 4s4.544144
'
o
3
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-SFA34O DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90
PAGE
DATE
0009
01/22/90
CHK #
DATE EXP
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 110-400-3302-4311 00559 $87.63
00112
32279
-...
.__._ENF
01/18/90
.r
1
MISC CHARGES/DEC-JAN 01/15/90 PARKING E'_.
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR. TOTAL •ntt*#****it# !*• **** tt?•#*tt*******it********ir**tt******ittt****t ****uta#it#tttt** $234. 90
$0.00
a
R ' CINTAS CORPORATION 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00133 $542.63
00002
32280
UNIFORM RENT/DEC 89 12/31/89 PUB WKS•ADMIN /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
R CINTAS CORPORATION 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00219 $42.00
$0.00
00002
01/16/90
32280
•
,
UNIFORM RENT/DEC 89 12/31/89 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL **********{t*****nit****•scat**************** ********* t#* ************** $584. 63
$0.00
01/18/90
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1101-4304 00263 $7.28
00915
32284
r.
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89 12/31/89 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE
R� - COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1121-4304 00255 $7.71
$0.00
00815
01/18/90
32284
01/18/90
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUC09 08/31/89 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1121-4304 00256 $6.82
$0.00
00915
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89 12/31/89 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1131-4304 00181 $9.74
$0.00
01215
01/18/90
32284
01/18/90
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/DEC89 12/31/89 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1131-4304 00182 $15.55
$0.00
00915
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89 12/31/89 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE
P. COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00271 $38.02
1
$0.00
00815
01/18/90
32284
•
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG89 08/31/89 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00272 $30.14
$0.00
01215
01/18/90
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/DEC89 12/31/89 I CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00273 $50.55
$0.00
00915
01/18/90
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89 12/31/89 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00291 $7.92
$0.00
00815
01/18/90
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG89 08/31/89 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00292 $8.77
$0.00
01215
01/18/90
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/DEC89 12/31/89 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
I
3
6
7
6
Ia
•
f.
19
20
2
14
25
26
27
2
3
3
3
J
1
11
4
5 ./
6
9 ..1
C
2
4
6
7
2
3
J
!II
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:40:55
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/23/90
PAGE 0010
DATE 01/22/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
INV/REFPO #
AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-1201-4304 00293 $16.31
00915
$0.00
32284
01/10/90---
LONG DISTANCE CHCS/SEP89
12/31/89
CITY MANAGER/TELEPHONE
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-1202-4304 00293 $62.86
00815
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHCS/AUG89
08/31/89
FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
_ COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-1202-4304 00294 $72.53
01215
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/DEC89
12/31/89
FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-1202-4304 00295 $64.80
00915
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89
12/31/89
FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/10/90
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-1203-4304 00291 $31.70
00815
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG89
08/31/89
PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-1203-4304 00292 $26.78
01215
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/DEC89
12/31/89
PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-1203-4304 00293 $51.22
00915
32214
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89
12/31/89
PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/10/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-2101-4304 00476 $384.40
00815
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG89
{
08/31/89
POLICE /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-2101-4304 00477 $305.53
01215
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/DEC89
12/31/89
POLICE /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-2101-4304 00478 $282.54
00915
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89
12/31/89
POLICE /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-2101-4304 00481 $38.33
374-4625
01275
32284
LONG DISTANCE/DEC 89,
-4625
12/31/89
POLICE /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
�R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-2401-4304 00270 $7.64
00815
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG89
08/31/89
ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-2401-4304 00271 $16.59
01215
32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/DEC89
12/31/89
ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/10/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-2401-4304 00272 $6.55
00915
32284 1
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89
12/31/89
ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
1
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-4101-4304 00293 $62.51
00815
1
32204
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUGO9
OB/31/89
PLANNING /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
7
J
7
3
4
5
6
7
A
70
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2
31
32
3
35
3..
3
3
4
8
0
0
3
5
8
8
D
0
2
13
'4
5
7
0
1
'2
.3
4
y
G
3
J
•
it
4,
43
44
+,
•1C
17
5,
53
54
75
5e
, FINANCE—SFA340
z
u
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
PAGE 0011
TIME
15:40:55
FOR 01/23/90 •
DATE 01/22/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME
VND #
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION
DATE INVC
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
.
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-4101-4304 00294 $35.90
01215 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHCS/DEC89
12/31/89
PLANNING /TELEPHONE
_
$0.00 01/18/90
R
' COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-4101-4304 00295 $42.86
00915 32204
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89
12/31/89
PLANNING /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/19/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-4201-4304 00285 $20.43
00015 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG89
08/31/89
BUILDING /TELEPHONE
:50.00 01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC `
00017
001-400-4201-4304 00286 $30.22
01215 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/DEC89
12/31/89
BUILDING /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-4201-4304 00287 $29.87
0091532284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89
12/31/89
BUILDING /TELEPHONE
$0.06-01/18/90--
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-4202-4304 00294 $68.13
00815 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHCS/AUG89
08/31/89
PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/16/90
_ R
_ COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-4202-4304 00295 $67.00
01215 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/DEC89
12/31/89
PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-4202-4304 00296 $52.83
00915 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89
12/31/89
PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-4601-4304 00339 $79.95
00815
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG89
08/31/89
COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
32284
$0.00 01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-4601-4304 00340 $53.33
01215 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHCS/DEC89
12/31/89
COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-4601-4304 00341 $57.77
00915 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89
12/31/89
COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-6101-4304 00193 $19.32
00815 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHCS/AUG89
08/31/89
PARKS /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
COM SYSTEMS, INC
00017
001-400-6101-4304 00194 $11.74
01215 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/DEC89
COM SYSTEMS,
12/31/89
PARKS /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
5
e
INC
00017
001-400-6101-4304 00195 $16.23
00915 32284
R
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89
COM SYSTEMS, INC
12/31/89
00017 •
PARKS /TELEPHONE
105-400-2601-4304 00128 $33.26
$0.00 01/18/90
00815 32284
e
e
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG89
08/31/89
STREET LIGHTING /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
e
.,
7
7
•
7
L_.
2
3
4
5
7
a
10
„
13
,3
14
15
1e
,4 —
0
J
4
G
7-
3 1 —
n
3
0
7
0
3
a
e —
7
0
0
2
3
4
7
8
e
0
z
3
4
5
1'
1'.
n
12
43
44
45
19
t7
48
49
58
51
52
53
54
55
56
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90 '
PAGE 0012
DATE 01/22/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN It AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
PO # CHK #
UNENC DATE EXP
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 105-400-2601-4304 00129 $8.46
01215 32284
$0.00 01/10/90
00915 32284
—`
LONG DISTANCE CHCS/DEC89 12/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /TELEPHONE
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 105-400-2601-4304 00130 $19.45
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89 12/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /TELEPHONE
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00291 $37.30
$0.00 01/10/90
00815 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG89 08/31/89 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00292 $49.89
$0.00 01/18/90
01215 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/DEC89 12/31/89 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE
R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00293 $44.79
$0.00 01/18/90
00915 32284
LONG DISTANCE CHGS/SEP89 12/31/69 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE
*** VENDOR TOTAL **** ************#u-*• ********* .-************tett*#+ttt******************* $2,391.52
$0.00 01/10/90
• R THE *COPY SHOP 00022 001-400-4601-4302 00069 $95.85
09097 32285
_
WALKING CLUB FLYERS 12/20/89 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING
t*4*+* VENDOR TOTAL *#*4ad**a*a*#t*i* *t*a*a* *a*t*3*#i*t*#t*##a*itt*i*; •#*i***t*********a**# -*##*##*#a**#*###*a* $95.85
$95.85 01/10/90
R CSULB FOUNDATION 00349 001-400-4201-4316 00178 $275.00
10333 32286
SEMINAR REG/P. CORNEAL 01/08/90 BUILDING /TRAINING
*f*+* VENDOR TOTAL ******i***************************st*********jt***** ****************** $275. 00
$0.00 01/18/90
R THE*DAILY BREEZE 00642 001-400-1121-4323 00087 $30.94
01270 32287
MISC CHGS/DEC 89 ` 12/31/89 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING
i*a*;* VENDOR TOTAL ** **********************pit**********tt•n•n•********** t***************** $30. 94
$0.00 01/18/90
R DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 001-400-2201-4311 00308 $80.20
00117 32288
MISC CHARGES/DEC—JAN 01/15/90 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
R DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 001-400-3103-4311 00523 $52.72
$0.00 01/18/90
00117 32288
MISC CHARGES/DEC—JAN 01/15/90 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
R DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 110-400-3302-4311 00562 $323.78
$0.00 01/18/90
00117 32288
MISC CHARGES/DEC—JAN 01/15/90 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE
$0.00 01/18/90
7
5
6
7
8
12
20
72
23
24
5
6
27
76
2'.
37
35
37
4
4a
45
47
46
4U
3
4
6
8
U
n
4
7
R
0
2
3
4
5
402
16,
w
w
v
M
r
IR
11
50
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90
PAGE 0013
DATE 01/22/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
PO #
UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $456.70
32289
R DATA SAFE 00156 001-400-1206-4201 00663 $115.00 46448
00047
TAPE STORAGE/DEC12—JAN11 46448 12/23/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $115.00
$0.00
01/18/90
R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00123 $359.16
00014
32290
SHELTER. COSTS/DEC 89 01/10/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $359.16
$0.00
01/18/90
R DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 00049 001-300-0000-3204 01790 $211.14
10334
32291
SEISMIC FEES/OCT—DEC 89 01/09/90 /BUILDING PERMITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $211.14
$0.00
01/18/90
R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 001-400-3104-4251 00035 $1,370.63 111482
10609
32292
HWY MAINTENANCE/SEP—OCT 11482 12/07/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00102 $1,370.63 111482
$0.00
10609
01/18/90
32292
01/18/90
HWY MAINTENANCE/SEP—OCT 11482 12/07/89 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,741.26
$0.00
R DFM ASSOCIATES 00726 001-400-1122-4305 00098 $87.38 90-000426
09323
32293
ELEC. CODE BOOKS/COVERS 00426 01/09/90 ELECTIONS /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $87.38
$87.18
01/18/90
R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 00269 001-400-2101-4201 00514 $832.20 247853890
00068
32294
1
1
COMPUTER MAINT/DEC 89 53890 12/31/89 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 00269 001-400-2201-4201 00114 $554.80 247853890
$0.00
00068
01/18/90
32294
COMPUTER MAINT/DEC 89 53890 12/31/89 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,387.00
$0.00
10511
01/18/90
32295
1
1
1
R MIKE*DRUSKOVICH 02601 001-210-0000-2110 03484 $500.00 86898
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 86898 01/12/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
$0.00
01/18/90
4402
1\
3 '
4
5
6
7 542
0
11
10
1, w
12
1
14
54..41
e
,e
0 v
20
22
22 v
24
2.
21,
27 v
3.
5,
u
35 U
37
30
3Uu
4'J
4,
v
4
•
a
7v
0
,
e
0
4
e
0
v
Y
4
1 O
15
21
15
76
37
+n
41
42
43
44
45
10
17
4n
49
50
51
53
54
55
56
37
FINANCE—SFA34O
TIME 15:40:55
6
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/23/90
PAGE
DATE
0014
01/22/70
CHK #
DATE EXP
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
PR.OJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
*** VENDOR
TOTAL***********************************************************mit****** *500.00
10512
32296
R
TERRY M.*DURISH
_02592
001-210-0000-2110 03482
*50.00 86836
*** VENDOR
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 86836 01/12/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
TOTAL***************at**************************tat************************ *50. 00
*0.00
01/18/90
R
EASTMAN, INC.
02514
001-400-1208-4305 00712
*979.80
01266
32297
R
MISC CHGS/DEC 89
EASTMAN, INC.
12/31/89
02514
GEN APPROP
001-400-4101-4305 00381
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
556.39 5682089
30.00
08671
01/18/90
32297
*atat VENDOR
HVY—DUTY PAPER PUNCH 82089 01/04/90 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
TOTAL *tsar*******at**atatatatatatatat*atatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatat*atatatatatatatatatnatatatatatatatatatatatata *** *1,036.19
*56.39
01/18/90
R
atatat VENDOR
EASY READER
00181
001-400-1121-4323 00088
*674.09
01267
32298
PUBLIC NOTICES/DEC 89 12/31/89 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING
TOTAL******************************************************************** $674.09
*0.00
01/18/90
R
R
THE*ECONOMICS PRESS, INC.
00704
001-400-1202-4305 00287
397.50 4875811-1
09287
32299
01/18/90
32299
PUBLICATIONS%FINANCE 811-1
THE*ECONOMICS PRESS, INC.
01/11/90
00704
FINANCE ADMIN
110-400-3302-4305 00646
/OFFICE OPER'SUPPLIES
$113.83 4875811-1
*0.00
09287
PUBLICATIONS/GEN SERV 811-1 01/11/90 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
atatat VENDOR TOTAL a t*******at*******************************************at•µ************** $211.33
*0.00
01/18/90
R
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
00165
001-400-2101-4311 00784
5341.85
01222
32300
R
MISC CHCS/DEC 89
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
12/31/89
00165
POLICE
001-400-2201-4311 00307
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
*2.80
*0.00
01222
01/18/90
32300
R
MISC CHGS/DEC 89
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
12/31/09
00165
., FIRE
001-400-3103-4311 00522
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
*93.05
*0.00
01222
01/18/90
32300
R
MISC CHGS/DEC 69
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
12/31/89
00165
ST MAINTENANCE
001-400-3104-4311 00040
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
*247.14
50.00
01222
01/18/90
32300
MISC CHCS/DEC 89
12/31/89
TRAFFIC SAFETY
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
*0.00
01/18/90
23
4
5
6
7
6
9
n
i1
5
16
17
16
19
20
21
23
74
25
26
27
30
31
3
35
36
30
31
4'
4:
44
45
47
an
49
50
51
52
5
5!
56
57
50
59
0')
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
80
70
71
72
13
74
76
7y
:1;
2
3
)6,
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0015
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90 • DATE 01/22/90
2
` -
°
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
°
7
°
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4201-4311 00192 $5.68
°
9
0
1
1, 114
01222. 323 80
MISC CHGS/DEC 89 12/31/89 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE 4.0.00 01/18/90-----i5
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4202-4311 00133 $16.9916
MISC 323001
,5
CHCS/DEC 8901222
12/31/89 PUB WKS ADMIN
is
`. LI
15
/AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/18/90ii
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4205-4309 00437 $133.0720I
120 323001
18
MISC CHCS/DEC 8912/31/890
EQUIP SERVICE
J
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/18/90
R EDDINGS BROTHERS 'AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4205-4311 00159 $118.33 01222 32300
sl
1
22
2'
MISC CHCS/DEC 89 12/31/89 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/18/90
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4601-4311 00079 $3.00 0122232300
24
25
20
2'i
MISC CHGS/DEC 89 12/31/89 _ 2�
COMM RESOURCES /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/18/90 ,
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-6101-4311 00206 $0.56311
MISC 01222 32300
CHGS/DEC 89 ,:
12/31/89 PARKS /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/18/90 ��
36
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00558
----
$529.92_ 01222 32300 ,,
MISC CHGS/DEC 89
I,.I 12/31/89 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/18/90 37
30
P. EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 160-400-3102-4311 00137 $351.603O'
MISC 01222
CHGS/DEC 89 32300
41
12/31/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/18/9042.
### VENDOR TOTAL ##############• #######i<###it###*#i<• ##i#*#######*###iE#;<###*###*#i<#*### $1,843.99 d4
44
4,
,- R ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 02354 001-400-3103-6900 00044 $1,736.7847
LEASE PAYMENT/FEB 00060. 32301
90 4r,
01/15/90 ST MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 01/18/90 40
to
9 ### VENDOR TOTAL########i?•#Y#•####################################################i:#i'# $1,736.78 52
• 52
5
5.4
42 R ROBERT#ESSERTIER 03221 001-210-0000-2110 03480 $1,575.00 74760 10507 32302
4'1 —IJORK GUAR
55. 6�
REFUND 74760 01/12/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 01/18/90 01
14
58
4. ### VENDOR TOTAL######:t############################################•u############i�•### $1,575.00 50
60
17 • 61
e�
t° R EXECUTIVE—SUITE SERVICES INC. 01294 001-400-4204-4201 00356 $1,325.00 00062 32303
4`' JANITOR
64�
SERV/DEC 89 12/31/89 BLDG MAINTf /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/90 06
50
6°
51 ### VENDOR TOTAL#####################################################iE############## 67 ill
,z $1, 325. 00
6w
5J L'J
70
71
%4 R FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 01962 001-400-1202-4201 00200 $22.00 6-977-12199 09286 32304
" OVERNIGHT
72'
MAIL/RROW 12199 12/27/89 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/90 73
56
74 a
' 75'\
79
,y
J
J'
,JO
Jl
Jv
JV
Ur
L
'iY
•
a
n
43
14
45
40
5,
SI
53
54
55
'56
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:40:55
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/23/90 '
PAGE
DATE
0016
01/22/90
CHK #
DATE EXP
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION -
VND #
DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO #
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC
*** VENDOR
TOTAL**********************tr**tr****************************** *********** $22. 00
R
' FRANKSONS, INC.
00010
110-400-3302-4311 00557
$1,095.50 16497/16361
09921
32305
CUSHMAN PARTS 16361
11/29/89
PARKING ENF
/AUTO MAINTENANCE $1,082.53
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL trtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtHrtrtetetrtHrtrtrtrtHrtrtrtrtrtrtrtetrtrtrtrtrtrtrtetrtHrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrte;Etrtrtrtr*tri<tr $1,095.50
R
-GATES MC DONALD '
02596
705-400-1217-4182 00127
$7,899.73
09788
32306
WORKERS COMP CLAIMS/DEC
12/31/89
WORKERS COMP
/WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL tetrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtHrtetrtHr*trtetrtHrtrtrtrtrtHHrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtr#trtrtetr*trtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtr $7,899.73
R
GATES, MCDONALD & COMPANY
02538
705-400-1217-4201 00064
$1,333.34 137330000402
00044
32307
LIABILITY SERV/DEC 89 00402
01/04/90
WORKERS COMP
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00
01/18/90
#** VENDOR
TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,333.34
R
JOHN*GEORGINO
03217
001-400-4201-4316 00179
$30.00
10324
32308
REIN!r Mi
0 /02/90
BUILDING
/TRAINING
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL*****************tHrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtr#♦FtrtrtraFtrtrtrtttftrtrtrtrtrtr****#trtrtriftr>Ft *** $30. 00
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1101-4304 00262
$7.89
01225
32312
TELE CHARES/DEC 89
12/31/89
.CITY COUNCIL
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1101-4304 00264
$6.17 3180200
00162
32312
DIRECT-01AL CAa8/JAN,,90 80200
01/01/90
CITY COUNCIL
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90 _
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1121-4304 00254
$25.56
01225
32312
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
, CITY CLERK
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1121-4304 00257
$15.42 3180200
00162
32312
DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 90 80200
01/01/90
CITY CLERK
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
, GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1131-4304 00180
$11.08
01225
32312
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
CITY ATTORNEY
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED
—DIfECT
00015
001-400-1131-4304 00183
$7.71 3180200
00162
32312
DIAL CHGS/JAN 90 80200
01/01/90
CITY ATTORNEY
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
3
4
5
7
a
u
11
1:1
14
15
IP,
i1
la
16
21
22
23
74
26
27
28
3,
31I
3r:
35
3r
37
30
40
41
42
43
44
45
45
47
4^
49
5c
51
53
54
55
3G
57
517
G'1
62
53
64
15
86
c7
,0
/0
3
5
;J'
-W�
w
V
1910
119
4
v
f
4
4
45
14
57
53
54
55
56
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:40:55
O
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/23/90
PAGE 0017
DATE 01/22/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
INV/REFPO #
AMOUNT UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1141-4304 00270
$35.39
01225
$0.00
32312
01/18/90__
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
CITY TREASURER
/TELEPHONE
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1141-4304 00274
$0.73
372-6186
01269
32312
FAX BILLING/DEC 89 -6186
12/31/89
CITY TREASURER
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1141-4304 00275
$11.57
3180200
00162
32312
DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 90 80200
01/01/90
CITY TREASURER
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/10/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1201-4304 00290
$20.65
01225
32312
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
CITY MANAGER .
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1201-4304 00294
$0.71
372-6186
01269
32312
FAX BILLING/DEC 89 -6186
12/31/89
CITY MANAGER
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1201-4304 00295
$13.88
3180200
00162
32312
DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN 90 80200
01/01/90
CITY MANAGER
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1202-4304 00292
$77.46
01225
32312
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
FINANCE ADMIN
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1202-4304 00296
$20.59
372-6186
01269
32312
FAX BILLING/DEC 89 -6186
12/31/89
FINANCE ADMIN
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1202-4304 00297
$50.12
3180200
00162
32312
DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN 90 80200
01/01/90
FINANCE ADMIN
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1203-4304 00290
$29.24
01225
32312
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
PERSONNEL
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
P.
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1203-4304 00294
$3.63
372-6186
01269
32312
FAX BANG/DEC 89 -6186
12/31/89
PERSONNEL
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1203-4304 00295
$18.51
3180200
00162
32312
DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 90 80200
01/01/90
PERSONNEL
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1206-4304 00203
$199.39
01225
32312 e
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
DATA PROCESSING
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/10/90
e
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1206-4304 00204
$23.13
3180200
00162
e
32312
DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 90 80200
01/01/90
DATA PROCESSING
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
R
,
e
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1207-4304 00169
$13.02
01225
32312
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
BUS LICENSE
/TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
7
7
7
�J�
3
6
9
0
s
2
.1
5
ID
�+
z
y
4
5
7
J
4
1.
7
4
51.0
6
c 1i
to
to
a
z
a
54
•
5l
1.3
54
50
17
•
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:40:55
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
PAGE 0018
FOR 01/23/90
DATE 01/22/90
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
INV/REF
PO # CHK #
DATE INVC
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
UNENC DATE EXP
R
,
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1207-4304 00170 $7.71
3180200
00162 32312
$0 00 01/188/90
'`—
DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAB! 90 80200
01/01/90
BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-1208-4304 00039 $10.60
01225 32312
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
, GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN
00015
001-400-1208-4304 00040 $7.71
3180200
00162 32312•
90 80200
01/01/90
GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-2101-4304 00474 $1,271.61
01225 32312
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
POLICE /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-2101-4304 00480 $345.42
3180200
00162 32312
DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN
90 80200
01/01/90
POLICE /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-2201-4304 00225 $173.04
01225 32312
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
FIRE /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/10/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JF,N 90
00015
001-400-2201-4304 00227 $7.71
3180200
00162 32312
80200
01/01/90
FIRE /TELEPHONE
$O. 00 01/18/18/ 90
P
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELE
00015
001-400-2401-4304 00269 $31.70
01225 32312
CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN
00015
001-400-2401-4304 00273 $11.57
3180200
00162 32312
90 80200
01/01/90
ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-4101-4304 00292 $56.85
01225
CELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
PLANNING /TELEPHONE
32312
$0.00 01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-4101-4304 00296 $9.59
372-6186
01269 32312
FAX BILLING/DEC 89 —6186
12/31/69
PLANNING /TELEPHONE
r
$0.00 01/10/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-4101-4304 002.97 $38.56
3180200
00162 32312
•
DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 90 80200
01/01/90
PLANNING /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-4201-4304 00284 $144.41
01225 32312
a e
TELE CHARGES/DEC
89
12/31/89
BUILDING /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
e
a
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-4201-4304 00288 $69.40
3180200
00162 32312
DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 90 60200
01/01/90
BUILDING /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
a
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
00015
001-400-4202-4304 00293 $222.25
01225 32312
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE
$0.00 01/18/90
a
7
•7
7
7
10
12
14
13
16
17
IB
19
z0
21
2
23
z4
6
4
31
3
7
5
41
4
6
9
2
4
0
9
3 .J
•J
5
�r
2
4
S
n
0
7
1T1
70
a3
14
45
4r
•0
4,4
50
,3
54
55
5e
7
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:40:55
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/23/90 .
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
FAX BILLING/DEC 89 —6186
P. .GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN 90 80200
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
FAX BILLING/DEC 89 —6186
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL.CHGS/JAN 90 80200
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 90 80200
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
00015 001-400-4202-4304 00297 $17.39
12/31/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE
00015
01/01/90
00015
12/31/89
00015
12/31/89
001-400-4202-4304 00298
PUB WKS ADMIN
001-400-4204-4321 00487
BLDG MAINT
001-400-4601-4304 00337
COMM RESOURCES
$77.11
/TELEPHONE
PAGE 0019
DATE 01/22/90
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
372-6186 01269 __ 32312
$0.00 01/18/90
$17.09
/BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT
$154.13
/TELEPHONE
3180200 00162 32312
t0
12
3
4
15
$0.00 01/18/90
01225
$0.00
01225
$0.00
32312
01/18/90
32312
01/18/90
00015 001-400-4601-4304 00342 $2.97 372-6186 01269 32312
12/31/89 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-4601-4304 00343
01/01/90
$15.42
COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-6101-4304
12/31/89 PARKS
00192 $9.87
/TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-6101-4304 00196 $7.71
01/01/90 PARKS /TELEPHONE
r 1
le
17
18
0 ..
20
21
22
2Z ./
$0.00 01/18/90
3180200 00162
00015 110-400-3301-4304 00129 $10.00
12/31/89 VEH PKG DIST /TELEPHONE
00015 110-400-3302-4304 00290
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
FAX BILLING/DEC 89 —6186
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 90 80200
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELE CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
00015
12/31/89
• PARKING ENF
110-400-3302-4304 002.94
PARKING ENF
00015 110-400-3302-4304 00295
01/01/90
$181.55
/TELEPHONE
$0.22
/TELEPHONE
$90.20
32312
24
26
27
31
$0.00 01/18/90
01225
80. 00
32312
01/18/90
3180200 00162 32312
$0.00 01/18/90
01225 32312
$0.00 01/18/90
01225 32312
$0.00 01/18/90
372-6186 01269
32312
4
45
4
47
4'
51
PARKING ENF
00015 145-400-3401-4304 00050
12/31/89
DIAL A RIDE
/TELEPHONE
$4.16
/TELEPHONE
*** VENDOR TOTAL****************************1tt***************************************
R GTEL
EOUIP RENT/DEC 89—JAN 90
01340 • 001-400-2101-4304
01/11/90 POLICE
$0.00 01/18/90
3180200 00162
$3,587 BO
00475 $93.12
/TELEPHONE
32312
$0.00 01/48/90
01225 32312
$0.00 01/10/90
01226 32313
$0.00
01/'18/90
5
54
s5
56
57
5e
50
CC:
61
C2
63
64
e5
en
67
66
70
7,
72
!3
74
75
79
J
1111J
33
54
55
'.6
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90
z
o
4
o
PAGE
DATE
0020
01/22/90
CHK #
EXP
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
PO #
UNENC DATE
R GTEL 01340 001-400-2201-4304 00226 $92.56
01226_
32313
EQUIP RENT/DEC 89 -JAN 90 01/11/90 FIRE /TELEPHONE
60. 06
01/19/90 _
R GTEL 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00338 $199.44
01226
32313
i=OUI - AN 9 01/11/90 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/16/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************n*********************************** $385.12
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 001-400-1212-4188 01612 $2,059.27
00001
32314
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 105-400-2601-4188 00882 $4.20
00001
32314
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/13/90
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 110-400-3302-4188 01091 $104.73
00001
32314
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 145-400-3401-4188 00823 $2.22
00001
32314
CITY HEALTH INS%FED 90 01/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
8/90/90
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 145-400-3402-4188 00825 $1.14
00001
32314
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 145-400-3403-4188 00226 $3.43
00001
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
_32314__
01/18/90
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 160-400-3102-4188 00824 $27.30
00001
32314
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 705-400-1209-4188 00193 $28.66
00001
32314
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00192 $33.91
00001
32314
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90' WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,264.86
R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 00731 001-400-3103-4311 00519 $118.81
1C13232
10094
32315
AIR CLEANERS/ST SWEEPER 13232 01/06/90 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
$117.17
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL*******************aI************************************************ $118.81
R HAWTHONE POLICE DEPARTMENT 00172 001-400-2101-4251 00297 $2,400.00
H224
00042
32316
SOFTWARE SERV/OCT-DEC 89 HB24 12/31/89 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
$0.00
01/18/90
3
5
7
a
9
10
12
13
15
10
19
20
21'1
221
23
24
26
27
,6
31
32.
33
14
35
3
3
3
3
4,
42
43
44
45
AI:
42
n5
4:.
51
2
2
0
9
0
J
J
4
5
6
7J
R
0
2
4
fir
V
4
4.
4
41
41
5
5
53
54
55
56
,4 4.° .
Mfr a,'Y' Y�fi�i L'r�p�4rp.Hr':�J,.,?�j td Jar+,�;(tt9k:i Y t'r. 01t4 f.ta.',�>�7s
5
4
5
6
]
6
9
0
i,
z
4
5
6
D
0
4
5
6
7
n
z
4
0
6
J
1,4
•
4'
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
2 FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0021
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90 ' DATE 01/22/90
—
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
6 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
]
0
*** VENDOR TOTAL **** **** •it#********#***• ******tr#• ****#rt*#tt*****ar**nit**tr•a-tt*#******** $2.400.00
R ' HAWTHORNE MOTORS 03203 001-400-4205-5403 00005
$5,915.61 10099 32317
USED VAN/CITY MECHANIC 01/04/90
EQUIP SERVICE /VEHICLES $5,915.61 01/10/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************it*********************************tr*************** $5.915.61
R HERMOSA CAR WASH ' 00065 001-400-2101-4311 00788 $124.00 01228 32318
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/18/90
R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-2401-4311 00171 $12.00
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 01228 32318
12/31/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/18/90
4 R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-4201-4311 00193 $12.00 01228 32318
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/18/90
—_,R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 110-400-3302-4311 00560
$4.00 01228 32318_
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/10/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $152.00
R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY 00149 001-400-1206-4., 01 00661
,
$1,072.84 7R98332 09518 32319
LASER JET PRINTER FONTS 98332 12/20/89
DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $1,070.34 01/18/90
R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00662 $2,172.00 07F1RIB 00010 32319
TERMINAL
MAINT/JAM—MAR F1R18 01/03/90 -DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/90
R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00664
5
,
5
$1,223.00 0701R58 00009 32319
COMPUTER SYS MAINT/JAN90
G1R58 01/03/90 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/90
R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00665 $3,306.83 07RJ8967 00032 32319
SOFTWARE MAINT/JAN—MAR J8967 01/03/90 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL*****************'*'*'*******************************************#***** $7,774.67
5
6
R INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK 01484 705-400-1210-4201 00045 $9.250.592 2
09779 3�.3�0
0
PROPERTY INS/FY 89-90 12/26/89 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $9, 250. 59
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-400-4204-4309 01538 $313.05 37869/36365 10039 32321
WIRE MOLDS/ENERGY PROC. 36365 12/22/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $313.02 01/18/90
53
54
55
56
,4 4.° .
Mfr a,'Y' Y�fi�i L'r�p�4rp.Hr':�J,.,?�j td Jar+,�;(tt9k:i Y t'r. 01t4 f.ta.',�>�7s
5
4
5
6
]
6
9
0
i,
z
4
5
6
D
0
4
5
6
7
n
z
4
0
6
J
1,4
•
4'
i
5
0
•
1
41
12
4:1
44
43
1a
47
40
19
50
51
53
34
55
56
`7
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:40:55
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/23/90
PAGE
DATE
-1
0022
01/22/90
CHK #
DATE EXP
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
DATE IN'VC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
PG #
UNENC
R
INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
02458
001-400-4204-4309 01539
$155.11 37870
10095
32321
HALIDE LAMPS 37870
12/22/89
BLDG MAINT
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$155.11
01/18/90 _
R
INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
02458
001-400-4204-4309 01540
$1,783.34 37086
10064
32321
EIGHT FIXTURES/CITY BLDG 37086
12/05/89
BLDG MAINT
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $1,783.35
01/18/90
*** VENDOR
TOTAL *tris****************its **************************teat******************* $2,251.50
R
INTERCOM 90
03218
001-400-2701-4316 00027
$150.00 TR278
00278
32322
CONFERENCE REG/MITCHELL TR278
01/15/90
CIVIL DEFENSE
/TRAINING
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR
TOTAL *****************************its *itis•itis******************************** $150.00
R
JET DELIVERY, INC.
00281
001-400-1202-4201 00199
$51.70 51639
09279
32323
DELIVERY/AUDIT PAPERS 51639
12/31/89
FINANCE ADMIN
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00
01/18/90 _.
R
JET DELIVERY, INC.
00281
001-400-4201-4305 00515
$45.95 50945
10332
32323
DELIVERY SEP,V%DUILDING 50945
12/15/89
DUILDING
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$0.00
01/18/90
R
JET DELIVERY, INC.
00281
126-400-8514-4201 00004
$26.40 51639
09279
32323
DELIVERY/RROW ESCROW 51639
12/31/89
CIP 89-514
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR
TOTAL ###ar#iritis#iris*##at##;tabs#itis#itis#itititititir#itis*****itiFit###tt###################it $124. 05
R
JOBS AVAILABLE
01165
001-400-1203-4201 00645
$220.68 90-01-044
09762
32324
EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING 1-044
01/03/90
PERSONNEL
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$100.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL itis#itatatititititatatititiHtirirititiritaruitttttttitttitititttitititititttitiEititititititititititititititititit>F•tt•itititititttit $220. 68
R
KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER
01871
110-400-3302-4316 00172
$125.00 112033
09962
32325
SEMINAR REG/H. TUBBS 12033
11/11/89
PARKING ENF
/TRAINING
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************itititititititttititititi<•ititxittttt •;osis• $125. 00
R
KIWANIS CLUB OF HERMOSA BEACH
00380
001-400--4101-4315 00113
$40.00
09675
32326
JAN DUES/M. SCHUBACH
01/03/90
PLANNING
/MEMBERSHIP
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40.00
R
LEARNED LUMBER
00167
001-400-2201-4309 00804
$91.27
00231
32327
MISC. CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
FIRE
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$0.00
01/18/90
0
7
10
11
14
20
21
22
23
24
2
26
27
20
20
3.
31
3•
j3
3
4'
n2
43
44
4C
47
4n
0
'I
2
fi
34
sa
17
0
9
0
2.
3
S5
1E
7
0
9
'0
2
3
4
5
9'
1L
•
16,
41
4
4
l
4
4
.n
40
40
51
52
53
54
55
56
)079 kg
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
, FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
1 TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90
PAGE 0023
DATE 01/22/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT ' INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
CNK #
DATE EXP
.
_ _ R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-2401-4309 00140 $010.10
01231
32327
01/10/90
32327
MISC. CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R LEARNED LUMBER I 00167 001-400-4204-4309 01545 $436.77
$0.00
01231
MISC. CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 105-400-2601-4309 00565 $4.70
$0.00
01231
01/18/90
32327
MISC. CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 160-400-3102-4309 00447 $40.79
$0.00
01231
01/18/90
32327
MISC. CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL **** *********************** ******* t****#********##***#********** * $583.63
$0.00
01/18/90
R ANNE*LOCKE 03210 001-210-0000-2110 03483 $50.00
89832 10508
32328
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 89832 01/12/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
*** VENDOR TOTAL *************#tet*tea•************* ******#**###****#***#***** ****##** $50.00
$0.00
01/18/90
R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 01320 001-400-2101-4187 00315 $54.04
41122 10193
32329
NEW HIRE UNIFORM/TANABE 41122 01/02/90 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
tea•te VENDOR TOTAL •*************************••p•it••teat•****•r*itit•r#•tEat;rtF*it•rrtt*tt•#***r*******•rta***yo- $54.04
$268.20
01/18/90
R JOYCE#L0NG 00635 001-400-1206-4317 00058 $29.05
01265
32330
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONFERENCE EXPENSE
R JOYCE#L0NG 00635 001-400-2101-4310 00226 $283.75
$0.00
01265
01/18/90
32330
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
N
*** VENDOR TOTAL tete****tete*******•***************************************************** $312.80
$0.00
01/18/90
R LOS ANGELES AIR CONDITIONING 02764 001-202-0000-2020 00976 $7,360.10
5608 09418
32331
RETENTION/CIP 88-610 5608 00/23/89 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
LOS ANGELES AIR CONDITIONING 02_764 001-400-8610-4201 00022 $248.50
$0.00
5608 10607
01/18/90
32331
(
RETENTION/FY 89-90 5608 01/03/90 CIP 88-610 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*tete VENDOR TOTAL a•*a****************************ern*********************************** $7,608.60
$0.00
01/18/90
f
LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. 00079 001-400-2101-4187 00317 $50.12
01234
32332
7
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
$0.00
01/18/90
7
3
10
12
,4
14
5
a
n
80
0
2
2
5
2..111)
2
J
J
7
0
6
6
6
0
1
4
5 ,.
1
12
4
16
17
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:40:55
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/23/90
PAGE
DATE
0024
01/22/90
CHK #
DATE
;l
4
5
6
7
n
4
10
11
is
14
e
16
17
16
20
1
22
23
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
R
*** VENDOR
LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC.
MISC CHARGES/DEC
00079
001-400-2201-4309 00801
$120.57
01234
$0.00
EXP
32332
01/18/90
89 17 /31/89 _
FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
TOTAL •vtrtt#• *ittt*#*tt**•n***#tt*#• ###iF•trtt•tt##tt##• **tt*#ae**tt• -#tt*tttt*it•#•attires#•w##*### $170. 69
P.
*** VENDOR
MAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO.
00426
105-400-2601-4309 00563
$507.0616
01235
3233318/
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS'
TOTAL it•tE*atint•first•tttt*tf•�itp•�a•tFtEtt�ttttttr•tttE*at•+t*tt ••�+tit*t�#tFtt•atEtE#tt•rttF •ttitttaFtEtt•*•eta**#atictE+t#*•a*•� $507.06
$0.00
01/18/90
R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
--CITY
01859
001-400-1212-4188 01617
$736.16
3334 _
01/18/90___
32334
01/18/90
323341
74
25
76
27
70
29
3',
32
3'
34
3
37
3+
HEALTH INS/FEB 90
R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH
01/15/90
01859
01/15/90
01859
01/15790
EMP BENEFITS
105-400-2601-4188 00884
STREET LIGHTING
110-400-3301-4188 00836
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$31.1131
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.663,'
0 $041 $0.00
0 $0
$0.00
000410
-__ R
--CITY'HEALTH
R
INS/FEB 90
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
INS7FELf 90
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01859
VEH FKG DIST
110-400-3302-4188 01093
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$136.70
$0.00
00041
01/18/90
32334
R
R
CIT7-AEALTR-IFJS7FED 90
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH IFl$7FED 90
01/15/90
01859
PARKING ENF
145-400-3401-4188 00825
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$4.3043
$0.00
0004132334
01/18/90
4
+
42
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH
01/15/90
01859
01/15/90
01859
DIAL A RIDE
145-400-3402-4188 00827
ESEA
145-400-3403-4128 00228
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.45
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.46
$ 50.00
00041
$0.00
00041
01/18/90
32334
01/18/90
3233451
44
4
46
47
44,3
0
50
31
"-
+
41
42
,
R
INS/FEI1 90
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITITHEALTR— NSTPEB
R
90
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY
01/15/90
01859
BUS PASS SUBSDY
155-400-2102-4188 00462
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.92
$0.00
00041
01/18/90
32334
12
33
54
55
44
45
47
+5
10
51
t,7
57
54
R
HEALTH INS/FEB 90
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY
01/15/90•
01859
CROSSING GUARD
160-400-3102-4188 00826
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$18.44
$0.00
00041
01/18/90
32334
56
57
58
50
no
81
62
C3..
R
HEALTH INS/FEB 90
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
01/15/90
01859
SEWER/ST DRAIN
705-400-1209-4188 00195
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1. 92
$0.00
00041
01/18/90
32334
R
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY
01/15/90
01859
LIABILITY INS
705-400-1217-4188 00194
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$3.84
$0.00
00041
01/18/90
32334
64
"5
CO
67
0
CU
70
71 ..
HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
WORKERS COMP
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
55
56
57
72
73
74
7579
J
0
77
30
40
41
42
43
44
46
47
40
40
57
5,
52
53
54
55
56
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
z FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90 .
n
PAGE
DATE
0025
01/22/90
CHK #
DATE EXP
PAY VENDOR NAME ' VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
IL DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
•
atatat VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************* $936.96
R .MANHATTAN CAR WASH 01146 001-400-2101-4311 00785 $328.40
01236
32335
M T ARGES/OCT—DEC 89 12/31/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
! R MANHATTAN CAR WASH 01146 001-400-4101-4311 00104 $19.00
$0.00
01236
01/18/90
32335
MISC CHARGES/OCT—DEC 89 12/31/89 PLANNING /AUTO MAINTENANCE
atatat VENDOR TOTAL ********tit****************************atria***************#***tiff**** $347.40
$0.00
01/18/90
R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 001-400-2101-4311 00786 $93.98
01238
32336
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL***********************tt******************************************** $93.98
$0.00
01/18/90
R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. 02272 001-400-2101-6900 00489 $1,072.55
00059
32337
01/18/90
32337
LEASE PMT/FEB 90 01/15/90 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS •
R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. 02272 001-400-2101-6900 00490 $1,233.52
$0.00
00056
LEASE PMT/FED 90 01/15/90 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS
atatat VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,306.07
$0.00
10331
01/18/90
32338
R MARTIN J.*MAYER 03220 001-400-1132-4201 00037 $660.00
CODE ENFORCEMENT/DEC 89 01/02/90 CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************tit*************************************** $660.00
$0.00
01/18/90
:
R MAYO MARKETING IDEAS. 03094 001-400-1101-4305 00294 $872.00
4736 09318
32339
RECOGNITION PLAQUES 4736 01/05/90 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******atstat*********************** tit#*#tt#*#tt#tt#tt#;t#atat#****attar*tt#at***** $872.00
$1,030.84
01/18/90
0
R KIMatMITCHELL 00522 001-400-2701-4316 00024 $51.50
TR278 00278
3340
1
c
PER DIEM/CIVIL DEFENSE TR278 01/15/90 CIVIL DEFENSE /TRAINING
### VENDOR TOTAL**********************aHtaHt******.************************************ $51.50
$0.00
01/18/90
R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 001-400-2101-4316 00502 $104.25
01163
32341
MISC CHARGES/NOV 89 12/11/89 210005 POLICE /TRAINING
$0.00
01/18/90
7
3
4
7
0
Y
10
11
12
11
14
15
16
17
16
10
70
z1
z'
z4
75
76
27
25,
31
3
3
41
3
4
5 . J
6
0
n4
5
C6
n7
60
70
71
J
12
4
•
o
:..
6
00
4
a1
42
4,
44
45
15
tl
40
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA34O DEMAND LIST PAGE 26
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90 DATE 01/220
2
/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO IS CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 110-400-3302-4310 00114 $30.1611
HISC 011. 3234118/
07
9
li
14
13
CHARGES/NOV 89 0 _ _ __,a
12/11/89 PARKING ENF /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0. 00 01/18/90--
1/18/90
iritis VENDOR TOTAL •ltts••t�*ittt•is• •gait*•3t•a*•rvir#aaititiE•�t****it•aa*•><*• #*teit##stir+t•�t•tFit•>f*•rr•ittE•u•##tr•**•p#tttt•tFtFatit*•>t## $134.41
—_`R MONARCH BROOM 00084 001-400-3103-4309 00936 $L 473. 67 03_x8 32342
MISC
16
17
10
19
20
21
22
234
CHCS/DEC 89 1
1/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/10/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL •tHE�t*•p•�tattrattt•• #tr•is•••Rt�it•�t•�t*tE#*�t•�t�t*tf•tFt'•tt•##tEtr•#*•u••��t#•�t•#tE�taft-#�tt�ittf•�*tf##tt�t•tt#tr•tE#*it $1,473.67
R CATHY#MORROW 03204 001-400-4101-4305 00382 $1,500.00 10901 550.0 383
24
25
26
27
2n
31
33
7
,l
3,.
4.
PLANNING NOTICES 10901 01/09/90 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $1,550.00 01/18/90
aitit VENDOR TOTAL itititititititi<:brit***••**##**#**##tr#####•*ff#####**##*#*#***##**#*###**##** $1, 500. 00
R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY 00071 001-400-1212-4188 01614
$772.20 00013 32344
CITY HEALTH INS/FED
90 01/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 01/18/90
it*# VENDOR TOTAL ittr•teaEat••Witte*tttftHt•x••u••r*tE •*#irittetf•w *at•tt•#tt- -ittE•x•reit♦t*it**•it•p•aria*tEte*ta•tt•#•x-it*it•+tts#tcitit••k*tt•*tt• $772. 20
R NEW PACIFIC LUMBER CO. 00606 160-400-3102-4309
4
41
42
00444 $80. Ob012393234543
M1SC CHARGES/DEC
89 .
1�/31/8'� SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/18/90
:brit VENDOR TOTAL ititititititititititititititit• itis#ttititititititit#ititttititit#i<:brit•i<iti<itititititttitititttittt#ttititititi;itit;-i;iti< $80.06
44
45
4J
R OCHOA & SILLAS 00095 705-400-1209-4201 00113 $40.00 3941 09781 32346
- LEGAL
40
49
5.
51
SERV/DEC 89 3941 12/29/89-
LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/9054
*** VENDOR TOTAL iFttttttitttrtit*itttitttitttitttititititititititiritrtttitititttitititttttititititittt*it•�ititititi.•itititii•?tie#itititit#i<ititit$40.00
$40- 00
52
33
36
R OKADA NURSERY 03184 001-400-8146-4309 00003 $176.14 8332 10079 32347
:i7
50
a5s
nl
n�
GAZANIA PLANTS/MEDIANS 8332 01/08/90 CIP 89-146 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $175.73 01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL it#itititit#ititiE##ititititit##it###:tit#itiFitititit#itititititit##it#it#it##tt#ttitit##iFitit#itis#iti=ttrtitit
4`l
50
51
53
54
55
$176. 14
54
F4
n.
'33
nn
69
70
71
R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 00093 001-400-2101-4311 00783 $443.3607"
SPOTWELDING/HB 11731 09645 32348
8 & 2 11731 12/20/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $443.36 01/18/90
56
57
72
73
74
75
71,
2
1
FINANCE—SFA34O
TIME 15:40:55
1
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/23/90
PAGE
DATE
0027
01/22/90
CHK #
DATE EXP
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
1
VND #
DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER, TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO #
AMOUNT UNENC
>
*** VENDOR
TOTAL ##•a#?t#*n•+arrant•n#+}**# •****it•n•tt#*attt•u.###•#atat•zt#*##*•a-#its•ittt•ittt+a#•n* •#t!*tt#x#*;t#et $443.36
R.
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
00235
001-400-1212-4180 01618
$1,248.54
00019
32349
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
EMP BENEFITS
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
. ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
00235
105-400-2601-4188 00885
$67.12
00019
32349
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
STREET LIGHTING
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
00235
110-400-3301-4188 00837
$1.44
00019
32349
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
VEH PKG DIST
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
'
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
00235
110-400-3302-4188 01094
$313.79
00019
_ 32349 ___
01/18/90
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
PARKING ENF
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
00235
145-400-3401-4188 00826
$7.54
00019
32349
c
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
DIAL A RIDE
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
CITY
00235
145-400-3402-4188 00828
$2.45
00019
32349____
HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
ESEA
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
00235
155-400-2102-4188 00463
$5.21
00019
32349
.
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
CROSSING GUARD
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
,
P,
ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
CITY
00235
160-400-3102-4188 00827
$32.96
00019
32349
HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
SEWER/ST DRAIN
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL it*###•n*#****** -**#tt***** t###*tt-*•***tt*tt*#•tt#*###**#####it****#*tt*at#***# $1,679.05
f
5
R
PACIFICARE
00575
001-400-1212-4188 01622
$16,638.68
00016
32350
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
EMP BENEFITS
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
5
R
PACIFICARE
00575
105-400-2601-4188 00887
$709.52
00016
32350
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
STREET LIGHTING
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
,5
5
R
PACIFICARE
00575
110-400-3301-4188 00838
$12.04
00016
32350
5
6
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
VEH PKG DIST
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
0
6
R
PACIFICARE
00575
110-400-3302-4188 01096
32,828.91
00016
32350
6
6
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
PARKING ENF
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
6
R
PACIFICARE
00575
145-400-3401-4188 00830
$82.50
00016
32350
6
6
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB_90
01/15/90
DIAL A RIDE
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
7
7
7
•
7
7
3 .)
4
6
7 .)
9
10
u J
2
5
7
6
e r
0
2
„
r�.
t2 �J
Il
•
,I %`
sr
LL
V
kw
L
0
'4)
0
7
0
,•
2
3
7 •
5'1
54
1+ h�t.1.4..
-
�,:.
• li
3
4
7
4
17
6
7
0
0
0
0
II
2
I3
0
9
0
'3
J
J
J
,J
0
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55
PAGE 0028
FOR 01/23/90
DATE_01/22/90____
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION
PO #
CHK #
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
UNENC
DATE EXP
R PACIFICARE 00575 145-400-3402-4188 00832 $27.46
CITY HEALTH
00016
32350
1
INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R PACIFICARE 00575 145-400-3403-4188 00229 $7.22
00016
32350
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
RPACIFICARE 00575 155-400-2102-4188 00464 $48.06
00016
32350
CITY HEALTH INS'/FEB 90 01/15/90 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
r,
R PACIFICARE 00575 160-400-3102-4188 00829 $325.06
00016
32350
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
1
P PACIFICARE 00575 705-400-1209-4188 00198 $87.50
CITY i1EALIH
00016
$0.00
32350
01/10/90 —'
IINS%FEB 90 01/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R PACIFICARE 00575 705-400-1217-4188 00197 $87.50
00016
32350
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
*4* VENDOR TOTAL ****************itaf*#tF**tt#+ttttr##*****************#tt#*t *************** $20,854.45
R PACTEL CELLULAR — LA 03209 001-400-2101-4304 00479 $67.33 1112741121589
01276
32351
MOBILE PHONE SETUP 21589 12/15/89 POLICE /TELEPHONE
$0.00
01/18/90
*4* VENDOR TOTAL ***-*##**#**#********+r##*tr***tr*##*r******#*tr#*********tr****** *****# $67. 33
R PAGENET 02487 001-400-1201-4201 00078 $11.50
00059
32352
PAGING SERVICE/JAN 90 01/01/90 CITY MANAGER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00
01/18/90
P PAGENET 02487 001-400-2101-4307 00205 $150.50
00059
WAGING SERVICE/JAN 90 01/01/90 POLICE /RADIO MAINTENANCE
$0.00
32352
01/18/90
R PAGENET 02487 001-400-2401-4201 00223 $11.50
'AGING
00059
32352
SERVICE/JAN 90 01/01/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00
01/18/90
5
*4* VENDOR TOTAL irte##tr#ar#ae#iE#tr####**tear#ar#teteartrar#tetearte#ae#teartetete##te###aetetrtete#atarteteteteartetr'tt'#teae# $173.50
5
B
R MARTHA*PEREZ 03211 001-210-0000-2110 03481 $50.00 88844
10510
32353
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 88844 01/12/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL a rtrtetrtrtrtrtrtrtrarararartrtrartrarartrartraHrartraetrtrartrararar#araetrarararartrtrartrtrtrtraraetrtrtrtrtratar*araraaatartrtrtr $50. 00
6
R PHOENIX GROUP 02530 001-400-1206-4201 00666 $435.00 4591-00
00071
32354
CITE MAINT/3RD GTR 89-90 91-00 01/03/90 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00
01/18/90
•
„
1+ h�t.1.4..
-
�,:.
• li
3
4
7
4
17
6
7
0
0
0
0
II
2
I3
0
9
0
'3
J
J
J
,J
0
V
1✓
16
17
10
79
42
44
46
17
10
40
50
S1
S3
34
SS
50
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90
PAGE
L1A1F_
0029
01/22/90
CHK #'
DATE EXP
PAY VENDOR NAME I VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER. TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
Piz #
AMOUNT UNENC
4
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************it*****iEtt****it*it-******** t-*****tt-#x•sF** $425.00
7620445 08020
$0.00
32355
R PITNEY BOWES 00222 001-400-1208-4201 00614 $179.34
PdETAGE SERV/FEB—MAY 90 68445 01/16/90 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $179.34
01/18/90
R POM INCORPORATED f 00223 110-400-3302-4309 00632 $1,775.14
912160 09915
$1,825.14
32356
01/18/90
PARKING METER PARTS 12160 12/21/89 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************************•*******.******** $1,775.14
R POSTMASTER 00097 001-400-1202-4305 00286 $72.00
728 09288
32357
ANNUAL P.O. BOX RENTAL 728 01/11/90 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $72.00
$0.00
01/18/90
R POSTMASTER 00398 001-400-4601-4302 00070 $1,000.00
10400
$0.00
32358
01/18/90
SPRING PROGRAM POSTAGE 01/03/90 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,000.00
R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 001-400-1212-4188 01624 . $61.25
00038
32359
CITY SHARE/AUTO—HOME/FEB 01/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 105-400-2601-4108 00889 $2.50
$0.00
00038
01/18/90
32359
CIT'7 SHARETAU O—HOME7FEB 01/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 110-400-3301-4108 00840 $0.50
$0.00
00038
01/18/90
32359
CITY SHARE/AUTO—HOME/FEB 01/15/90 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 110-400-3302-4188 01098 $4.25
$0.00
00038
01/18/90
32359
CITY SHARE/AUTO—HOME/FEB 01/15/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 160-400-3102-4188 00831 $1.00
$0.00
00038
01/18/90
32359
CITY SHARE/AUTO—HOME/FEB 01/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 705-400-1209-4188 00200 $1.25
$0.00
00036
01/18/90
32359
I
'
CITY SHARE/AUTO—HOME/FEB 01/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/10/90
2
3
4
7
0
9
O
2
13
4
5
6
7
15
10
70
21
22
2z
4
J
J
.1
J
26
27
3v
4
3
.0
0
0
1190
2
3
4
r
•
�
n
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90
PAGE 30
_
-"`
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
IE 01/2290_
PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 705-400-1217-4188 00199 $1. 25
--- -. 000 e
$0 B 3
3�;. 0�i 01/19/90
CITY SHARE/AUTO—HOME/FEB01/15/90----------------------
--------_-_—EN
WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************;t•tt•*********x*******-*#***
$72.00
3
R PROF COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLERS 02526 001-202-0000-2020 00977
08591 32360
— $134.19
RADIO CABLE/POLICE
12/20/89 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
R PROF COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLERS 02526 001-400-2401-4311 00169 $187.44
$0.00 01/10/90
09930 32360
AMBER LENSES/AN CONTROL 12/20/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************************************** ** $321. 63
$187.44 01/18/90
00143 32361
_
R RADIO SHACK 01429 001-400-2101-4305 01158 $65.55
'ISC
CHGS7N 90 01/11/90 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
R RADIO SHACK 01429 001-400-3104-4309 00384 $7.55
$0.00 01/18/90
MISC CHGS/JAN 90 01/11/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R RADIO SHACK 01429 105-400-2601-4309 00562 $31.11
MIBC
00143 32361
$0.00 01/10/90
00143 32361
CHGS/JAN 90 01/11/90 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL • ********* ******************************* **** ********************* $104.21
$0.00 01/18/90
R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO 00173 001-400-2101-4306 00743 $150.00
5912 08944 32362
REPAIR BOOKING CAMERA 5912 12/30/89 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************ac****•u****************************** $150.00
$0.00 01/18/90
R DAVID*RIVERA 03213 001-210-0000-2110 03478 $250.00
REFUND
88556 01794 32363
BANNER DEPOSIT 88556 01/09/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***sr*u*#*tt*tt*tt*x#***x ********#tt* *x*tti***#itit*x* #*it******#it*+tttaa#***tt $250. 00
$0.00 01/18/90
3
3
c
R BRUCE*ROBINSON 03215 001-400-4601-4308 00250 $250.00
TIMER/SAND
10409 32364
& STRAND RACE 01/04/90 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************-x*#******tt*************-u•**±t****** **** $250. 00
$0.00 01/18/90
6
6
°
R JOHN 5i.*RYAN 03214 001-210-0000-2110 03479 $250.00
REFUND
85141 01795 32365
7
BANNER DEPOSIT 85141 01/09/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
$0.00 01/18/90
z
J
i\
3
4
6
7
a
In
II
IJ
13
I6
17
ID
ID
0
zi
23
z4
7
6
0
3
6
n
n
0
2
J
J
J
J
J
aJ
J
A
2
CITY OF HERMOSA REACH —T�+
FINANCE—SFA34O DEMAND LIST PACE 0031
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90 DATE
` -
6
01/22/90
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
eo
0
*** VENDOR TOTAL***aa*******at***t;tt*it*trtriria*•u•*tr•ttn•*tt•it•• •tftt•p•tttt*•st• •,t#*•*•nft• **tt*tt*•it## *****tt** $250.00
a7
,0
R JIMMIE LEE*SHAW 00960 001-400-2101-4313 00230 $315.00 10226 32366
MEALS/HOTEL/PSO
14
,n
`'•'
's
,,
TRAINING 01/08/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC $0.00 01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL*tt;rtaat•••to#Ott•R•at••n•*#st•tFteat*p••p•tartar•tt#taat••-#ar•tta•p•#*•to-*•tr•ta#,:tFta*at#ta#tt•tt#mat• $315. 00
0
,o
i• n
,6
R SHOOP & LUTHER, INC. 02310 001-400-4205-4311 00158 $404.48 51048
•
20
2,
22
24
OIL/Al 10056 32367
' ..6 ••e 1 - = EQUIP
z'
ERVICE AITI MAINTE ANCE $0.00 01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL•�tatttEtttttta•tttattta•,ttttttattttttttittaattattaatttt•tt*tt*tttatatttttaatttttatttaHttttttttHttttttatttti<ttttttn•ttttattt•ntttt $404. 48
224
6
26
27
SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-4204-4309 01542 $73.98 01246 3 23
MISC. CHARGES/DEC
J
01•
_7
898/
12/31/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/1/18/90
### VENDOR TOTAL •eats•z<tttttttttttttttttttttt•ttttttttttttttttttattttttatt#tttttttttt##stttEtttttttt#•attttattttta<ta;Etttttt,:tttt $73.92
3"
''
R SIR. FRANCIS DRAKE HOTEL 03219 001-400-2701-4316 00025 $86.58 TR278
HOTEL/K.
3
> :?
00278 32369
MITCHELL TR278 01/15/90 CIVIL DEFENSE /TRAINING $0.00 01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL****;rtttttt*taataHHttatt•�atxtta<ta•z<attttt{<ttttttxtt;ftttttt;.tt*tt•s<tttttatttttrtatHttttt;ftt•z<ttifttti•ta*tatttt�•n;ttt
4+
$86.58
SIR SPEEDY 00361 110-400-3302-4305 00643 $22.2647\
LEASH LAW 099502
44
4
„
°
WARNING SIGNS 10487 01/04/9010487
PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $22.25 01/18/908/
SIR SPEEDY 00361 110-400-3302-4305
4�,
""
Sc
'"
00644 $45.97 10641 09957 32370
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMITS
s,�
i2
4,
10641 12/31/89 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $45.97 01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL ttttutatt*tttttt#ratan*tttttt•�attttttttatatatttttattttattttttatttttttattaatttttatt •ttatatta• tttttttatatttttatattttttttttttat<<tt 2,
$68. �3
63
7.6
44
46
R SMA (IHC) 03095 001-400-3103-4311
s6
si
50
00520 $2,674.93
ST SWEEPER REPAIR 49641 10/26/89 149641 10023 32371
69
ac
n
6
40
ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $3,206.72 01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL ttatttttafart*itttttttttttafttatttittttta•taattttttttt*ttttttttu•tttt.tttttattttt,******ttttatttttttttttttitttta#tttttttttttt $2,674.93
61
6:
c_.
51
7COMM
R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 • 001-400-4601-4308- 00251 $MATER 282373 01040
MISC CHARGES/DEC
64
66
67
5)
54
55
89 82373 12/31/89 323721 6H
RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00 01/18/90 6°
7
7, 46
56
`7
72
74
7646
7
J
J
J
J
J
aJ
J
A
12
43
44
45
1
40
44
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90
PAGE
DATE
0032
01/22/90
CHK 0
DATE EXP
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN R AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION_ DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO 0
AMOUNT UNENC
#a# VENDOR TOTAL ******######4#4####********** a**************#******************** * $88.18
49752
09956
$0.00
32373
01/18/90
P. SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00061 $1.423.00
EU8-7ASS—SAGES/DEC 89 7T7752 01/12/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
*4* VENDOR TOTAL########IF######?F####i!######lE#####it###it###elf###############-,Y#jf### #1F## $1,423.00
R SOUTH DAY GLASS 00351 001-400-2201-4309 00798 $70.46
30265
30275
08375
$0.00
10093
32374
01/18/90
32374
01/18/70
•
EMER-O R P / NGINE 11 30265 01/02/90 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R SOUTH DAY GLASS 00351 001-400--3103-4311 00521 $59.14
SFTY GLASS/ELGIN SWEEPER 30275 01/04/90 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCEc
** VENDOR TOTAL *******************#ate*****############************4.##*############# $129.60
$59. 14
•
R SOUTH DAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 31152 $11,562.00
09285
32375
CITE SURCHARGE/DEC 89 12/31/89 /COURT FINES/PARKING
*4* VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $11,562.00
$0.00
01/18/90
R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00400 110-300-0000-3302 31151 $74.00
09967
32376
CITATION COURT BAIL 01/11/90 /COURT FINES/PARKING
*4# VENDOR TOTAL ############################################+r#############*######## $74.00
$0.00
01/18/90
R SOUTH DAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-2201-4309 00799 $63.22
01251
32377
MISC CHCS/DEC 89 12/31/89 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-3103-4309 00937 $13.95
$0.00
01251
01/18/90
32377
MISC CHGS/DEC 89 12/31/89 • ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R SOUTH DAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-3104-4309 00385 $13.95
$0.00
01251
01/18/90
32377
MISC CHGS/DEC 89 12/31/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
### VENDOR TOTAL##4###******########################******######******############** $91.12
$0.00
01/18/90
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED/SON CO. 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00077 $126.16
01252
32378
i
ELEC DILLS/DEC 89 12/31/89 MEDIANS /UTILITIES
$0.00
01/18/90
•
4
5
e
7
e
9
5
ie
0
e
20
2
3
4
2
3
5
2
3
0
4
n
2
7
v
3
v
J
v
3'
3-
3
3•
4i
4.
41
5
5'
53
54
55
56
2
O
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:55 FOR 01/23/90 '
PAGE 0033
DATE 01/22/90
5
5
PAY VENDOR. NAME VMD # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
r
3
=
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00040
01252 32378
$554.22
ELEC BILLS/DEC
89 12/31/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES
R • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00359 $5,951.40
'0.00 01/18/90
01252 32378
ELEC BILLS/DEC 89 12/31/89 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00290 $1,558.82
$0.00 01/18/90
01252 32378_
6
ELEC BILLS/DEC 09 12/31/89 PARKS /UTILITIES
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00225 $295.66
$0.00 01/18/90
01252 32378
ELEC BILLS/DEC 89 12/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00127 $53.90
$0.00 01/18/90
01252 32378
ELEC BILLS/DEC 89 12/31/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL *+t*tt*********ar t****************************** ********* t****#*ir***** $8, 540. 16
$0.00 01/18/90
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00226 $14,459.67
00013 32379
STREET LIGHT BILLS/DEC89
12/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $14,459.67
$0.00 01/18/90
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00360
01253 32380
$717.54
GAS BILLINGS/DEC
89 12/31/89 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $717.54
`
R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00257 $2,548.00
$0.00 01/10/90
2645 00029
a
�
SWEEPING SERV/DEC 89` 2645 12/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 110-400-3301-4201 00245 $2,941.00
32381
$0.00 01/18/90
2645 00029 32381
SWEEPING SERV/DEC 89 2645 12/31/89 , VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $5,499.00
$0.00 01/18/90
32382
5
6
6
6
R STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 00707 001-400-1206-4305 00423 $33.0009290
2ND QTR SALES TAX/FY 90 12/31/89 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
;
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $33. 00
$0.00 01/18/90
6
R SUPERIOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 00425 001-400-2201-4309 00800 $27.00
78027 01255 32383
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 78027 12/31/89 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$0.00 01/18/90
7
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
0
,0
,z
13
,4
15
,6
J
Li
.J
16 d
0
J
6
� J
J
J
sV
4
V
0
0
V
3
5t./
6
a 00
5
3
4
0
n
3
5
a
9
0
2
3
e.
6
2
3
0
7
,y
70
71
72
73
74
75
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME i :40: 5 FOR 01/23/90
PAGE
DATE
0034
01/2/290 ,___._..
CHR #
DATE EXP
3
4
7
e
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4$ AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION •
PO 4
AMOUNT UNENC
*** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************** ***********t ******** **************** $27. 00
n
,
,
+
R TAK'S LAWNMOWER SALES & SERV. 00169 001-400-6101-4309 00802 $47.00
01256
32394
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************* $47.00
$0.00
01/19/90
,
,
2
R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY1 00124 001-400-6101-4309 00801 $111.37
01257
32385
2
2
2
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 160-400-3102-4309 00445 $16.28
$0.00
01257
01/18/90
32385
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************•**************** $127. 65
$0.00
01/18/90
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 001-400-1212-4188 01621 $168.85
00029
32386
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 105-400-2601-4188 00086 $1.52
$0.00
00029
01/18/90
32386
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 145-400-3401-4198 00829 $0.94
$0.00
00029
01/18/90
32386
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 145-400-3402-4188 00831 $0.38
$0.00
00029
01/18/90
32386
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 160-400-3102-4188 00828 $3.04
$0.00
00029
01/18/90
32396
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 705-400-1209-4188 00197 $3.17
$0.00
00029
01/18/90
32386
,
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 705-400-1217-4188 00196 $3.17
$0.00
00029
01/18/90
32386
3
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL***#,******************************ir*attt*#ttatit****jt****it#it*it-tt*****tt**** $181. 07
$0.00
01418/90
R TRANSCONTINENTAL SALES CO. 00443 001-400-2101-4187 00316 $164.22
49165 10172
$164.22
32387_
01/18/90
4
NAME TAPES/EPULETS/PD 49165 12/01/89 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
5
e
3
4
0
n
3
5
a
9
0
2
3
e.
6
2
3
0
7
,y
70
71
72
73
74
75
.17
'0
e
11
42
43
I. 44
�J/ 45
4e
17
40
40
1 50
J
51
52
53
54
55
56
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:40:55
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/23/90
•
PAGE
DATE
0035
01/22/90
CHK 0
DATE EXP
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND 44
DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 44 AMOUNT INV/REF
PROJ :0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PO 44
AMOUNT UNENC
* * VENDOR
TOTAL*****************************************************#***it********** $164.22
R
TRIANGLE HARDWARE
00123
001-400-2201-4309 00802
$29.61
01258
32388
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
FIRE
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
10.00
01/10/90
R
TRIANGLE HARDWARE
00123
001-400-4204-4309 01543
$469.14
01258
32388
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/09
BLDG MAINT
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS.
$0.00
01/18/90
R
TRIANGLE HARDWARE
00123
001-400-6101-4309 00803
$54.87
01250
32388
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
PARKS
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$0.00
01/10/90
R
TRIANGLE HARDWARE
00123
105-400-2601-4309 00564
$41.44
01258
32388_
_
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
STREET LIGHTING
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
TRIANGLE HARDWARE
00123
110-400-3302-4309 00633
$54.63
01258
32388
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
PARKING ENF
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
TRIANGLE HARDWARE
00123
110-400-3302-4311 00561
$13.26
01258
32388
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
PARKING ENF
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$0.00
01/10/90
R
TRIANGLE HARDWARE
00123
160-400-3102-4309 00446
$7.77
01258
32388
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89
12/31/89
SEWER/ST DRAIN
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$0.00
01/18/90
*** VENDOR TOTAL *#;.#,=#F#***tE##*#*ritfa*tt**istar*******txaEtFit-*to*r*tF****#**#it-tatt******ta**pit*# $670. 72
R
THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO.
02355
001-400-1212-4188 01616
$761.72
00028
32389
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
•EMP BENEFITS
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO.
02355
105-400-2601-4188 00803
$24.40
00028
32389
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
STREET LIGHTING
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
THE#UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO.
02355
110-400-3301-4188 00835
$0.80
00028
32389
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
VEH PKG DIST
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO.
02355
110-400-3302-4188 01092
$136.00
00028
32389
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
PARKING ENF
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
THE#UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO.
02355
145-400-3401-4188 00824
$4.48
00028
32389
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
DIAL A RIDE '
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
R
THE#UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO.
02355
145-400-3402-4188 00826
$1.52
00008
32309
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90
01/15/90
ESEA
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00
01/18/90
2
3
4
6
7
6
0
2
13
Li
l
l
6 J
6
7
u /
2r
21
22
2 .)
24
27
2
3
31 .J
3
3f
3E
J
41
4'
4
44
4.
4.
47
46
49
Bo
52
5/.
a7
511
61-
61
63
..1
64
65
66
67
60
OJ
7)
711
72
J3
74
75
1
L :•
ti
L_.
t1
1
41
12
.13
44
45
16
17
.10
4n
51
5:
53
54
55
�. 56
a
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:40:50 FOR 01/23/90
PAGE
DATE
0036
01/22/90
CHK #
DATE EXP
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
PO #
UNENC
P. THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 145-400-3403-4188 00227 $0.48
00028
32389
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 155-400-2102-4188 00461 $2.00
":0.00
00028
01/1d/i0
32389
1
Grim( HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
8 THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 160-400-3102-4188 00825 $20.00
=0.00
00028
01/18/90
32389
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 705-400-1209-4188 00194 $1.20
30.00
00028
01/18/90
32389
CITY HEALTH INS/FE_B 90 01/15/90 LIABILITY INS, /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 705-400-1217-4188 00193 $1.20
$0.00
00028
01/18/90
32389
01/18/90
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************u****************tr*************** $953.80
$0.00
8 UNITED AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. 02697 001-400-1212-4188 01615 $80.00
00065
32390•
CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 90 01/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $80.00
$0.00
01/18/90
8 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 00740 110-400-3302-4305 00645 $2,000.00
09965
32391
CITATION NOTICE POSTAGE 01/09/90 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 32.000.00
$0.00
01/18/90
8 VERNON PAVING COMPANY 00019 001-400-3103-4309 00938 $28.69
01260
32392
MISC CHARGES/DEC 89 12/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $28.69
$0.00
01/18/90
R J.S.*WARD & CO. AS AGENT FOR 02466 705-400-1209-4324 00123 $887.55
09787
32393
LIABILITY CLAIMS/DEC 89 12/31/89 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 3887.55
$0.00
01./18/90
,
R J. S. *WARD & COMPANY 02507 705-400-1209-4201 00114 33.850.00
00042
32394
1
WORKERS COMP SER/JAN-MAR 01/01/90 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00
01/18/90
23
4
5
7
0
u
10
14
10
20
22
23
24
25
20
27
20
3.;
31
l
33
3
35
3r
37
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
4
9
0
2
4
7
41.
541.
r
a
IR
0
2
3
4
g
t
41.
J
•LI
(.1
1
11
12
4
44
46
46
17
4D
40
50
51
]2
131
4
56
se
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:40:55
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 01/23/90 .
PAGE 0037
DATE 01/22/90
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
PO #
UNENC
CHK #
DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL *****4*******************to-*****************************3 *4I********** $3,850.00
•
10100
32395
R • WEST—LITE SUPPLY CO.
00833
001-400-4204-4309 01541
$275.42
C3305
1
LAMPS/CITY BUILDINGS C3305 01/03/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL to-**************************** *t *********************************** $275. 42
$275.42
01/18/90
7
R WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE
01152
001-400-1203-4201 00646
$644.00
13101/13102
09760
32396
EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING 13102 01/09/90 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL***tF-x*#**tt****-tr*tr**#*ir#ff*arat#-tt*****-z******#*#;ttt***#***- *n####ta•#****** $644. 00
$460.00
01/18/90
R SALLY A. *WHITE
00140
001-400-4102-4201 00237
$400.00
08677
32397
SEC. SERV/NOV 21. 89 01/08/90 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
#*# VENDOR TOTAL *tr#ff*prat##at***•a#**tr#******tt**attt*ttit**nit**#*3t*ntt*tt***#*tttr**t>•##tt* ***#** $408. 00
$0.00
01/18/90
R WYNDHAM PALM SPRINGS
03212
001-400-1201-4317 00207
$207.10
TR284
00284
32398
HOTEL/K. B. NORTHCRAFT TR284 01/16/90 CIT! MANAGER
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************* ***** *************
/CONFERENCE EXPENSE
**** $207. 10
$0.00
01/18/90
R XEROX CORPORATION
00135
001-400-1208-4201 00615
$490.22
023380037
01264
32399
<
METER USE/7-1 TO 12-31
R XEROX CORPORATION
—LEASE
80037
12/31/89
00135
GEM APPROP
001-400-1208-6900 00209
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$945.93 524269005
$0.00
00048
01/18/90
32399
PAYMENT/JAN 90
R XEROX CORPORATION •
69005
01/02/90
00135
GEN APPROP
001-400-1208-6900 00210
/LEASE PAYMENTS
$238.72
524269461
$0.00
00050
01/18/90
32399
'
5
LEASE PAYMENT/JAN 90
R XEROX CORPORATION
69461
01/02/90
00135
GEN APPROP
001-400-1208-6900 00211
/LEASE PAYMENTS
$321.28
524269462
$0.00
00049
01/18/90
32399
6
S
5
LEASE PAYMENT/JAN 90
R XEROX CORPORATION
69462
01/02/90
00135
GEN APPROP
001-400-2201-6900 00102
/LEASE PAYMENTS
$47.74
524269458
$0.00
00053
01/10/90
32399
6
6
6
e
6
LEASE PMT/JAN 90
R XEROX CORPORATION
69458
01/02/90
00135
FIRE
001-400-2401-6900 00055
/LEASE PAYMENTS
$56.15
524269459
$0.00
00051
01/18/90
32399
6
LEASE PAYMENT/JAN 90
69459
01/02/90
ANIMAL CONTROL
/LEASE PAYMENTS
$0.00
01/18/90
7
2
2
ti
"J
2
3
4
6
6
7
e
9
10
11
16
1e
ID
20
Li
J
J
J
24
zs
26
z2 J
1
„
4
6
0
9
1
2
A
6
8
J
J
/
J
J
J
J
• ,
14
. +OP
FINAMCE—SFA340
TIME 15:40:55
PAY
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST '
FOR 01/23/90 '
PAGE 0038
DATE 01/22/0
VENDOR NAME VND 4
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 s' AMOUNT INV/REF PO 11 CHK 4
PROJ 4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTIONAMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R
R
*** VENDOR
*** PAY
XEROX CORPORATION 00135
001-400-4601-6900 00056
,'...!
$189.65 524269460 00052 32399
PAYMENTS $0.00 01/10/90 —
$114.40 524269459 00051 22399
LL, -,:,L PAYMENT/JAN.90 69460 01/02/90
XEROX CORPORATION 00135
COMM RESOURCES /LEASE
110-400-3302-6900 00140
LEASE PAYMENT/JAN 90 69459 01/02/90 PARKING ENF , /LEASE
TOTAL ********************************************************************
PAYMENTS $0.00 01/18,90
$2,404.09
CODE TOTAL ******************************************************************
$224,289.55
*** TOTAL WARPJ,,NTS ******************************************************************
$861,205.64
—
---.1 HERLDY CLIIIIi.Y THAT THE DEMANDS OR ocLAIMS COVERED BY '-
THE WARRANTS LISTED UN PAG'iS. / TO •IINCLUSIVE OF THE
WARRANT REGISTER FOI__ Fi 1 iei9 A
.----, / ---____ARE ACCURATE
At4D- FUNDS -ARE rt;TITTATal-T7.27 r. i 'i -;‘IT 0F:
By atCetraLtA)
FINANCE ADMINISTnATOR
DATE //1)qq0 ' ....,..
...-.:::;..z.','•'.::,•::
'!
.. -..
• ,
14
. +OP
726 Prospect Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
January 22, l990
Kevin Northcraft, City Manager
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Re:
Traffic Study
Dear Sir:
Let us stop and reason. Several residents indicate left hand
turns and more signals are the way to go. But consider the
size of this town in having to maintain such uninhibited
self-centered interest without paying any attention to the
impact this sieve effect will have from commutor traffic.
Just observe the p'attern developed at peak loads now on
Pacific Coast Highway and Aviation. To encourage easing more
of the same habits is ridiculous.
Of course, harassment revenue taken from the local citizens
with the throwing of more traffic on cur residential streets
may be the motivating drive. Refer to the State Law for the
rights of a citizen backino out of a driveway or making a
left hand turn. If the other car shows a stoplight, one is
liable for a mov::..ng violation. In other words, one has no
rights under strict interpretation of the law'
Let's hope concern for all our residents takes precedence
over that for a few manioulating the exploitation of our city
streets'
Yours truly,
Violette M. Isgreen
Copies Li; HerwosCounc!1 �em�ers
�
SUPPLEMENTAL
U����������
KV��K�Uv0yU��U8K�U�
lg
726 Prospect Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 9025'f
January 22, 1990
Tim Casey, City Manager
'115 Diamond Street
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
Dear Sir:
There is evolving, with ever-increasing traffic, an
intolerable situation in our neighborhood. The Redondo Beach
business and paramedic units out oF your Grant Avenue station
have increased their routine use oF Prospect Avenue in
Hermosa Beach on their way to and From the South Bay Hospital
and City Hall and this Further compounds the problem. The
added traffic and sirens at all hours oF night and day are
most exasperating. Emergency use is one thing, but the bulk
oF the disturbing noise and traffic flow is unconscionable.
Duties and responsibilities dictate that this routine route
be changed, at least to Flagler or Harkness, as is indicated
on the enclosed map. There are shorter routes confined
within Redondo Beach City limits. Manhattan Beach basically
uses secondary streets and Pacific Coast Highway to the
hospital, not only For driving visibility and traffic Flow,
but also as a courtesy to the residential area.
It is hoped that thoughtful consideration will be given this
self -oriented immoral situation.
Yours truly, ,
Gi
Ze-4,4/4-zJ
Viclette M. Isoreen
Enclosure
Copy to Kevin NorthcraFt, Hermosa Beach City Manager
Do/ M
Ao. III...
BEACH
S
PLACES OF
INTEREST
Abate.. Care Beset.. . . W-23
Al.dra County O.C. . . .0-21
Alodra Park . . . . . . 0-27
Alpis Wills... . . . . . K-31
Artemis City 11.11 i Park . 1-51
Sacst Park R.cewey . . . 1-31
Bay Harbor Hospital . P-30
Bellflower Civic C.Mer . .0-47
Orinent Pier U 44
Benstead Plunge . . . . . L-26
Blob. College . . . . . . 13-51
Cabrillo Beath Park . . . 2-32
California Stale College
at Long Beach . . . . R-40
California State Unl..nity
Gomi01ues Hills . . . . 1-34
California Stat. Uolro Potty
Long Beach . . . . .
C.dle.od Country Club . 0-55
Cordon City 11.11 M-34
Carlos Mall . . K-11
Cerritos Civic Center . . 1-53
Cerritos College . . . . . G-50
Cerritos Regional Co. Park J-52
(Iran..
H.W110.101 Park . .M-21
Charter Pacific ueapita . M-21
Cheater: W..kingteaO.C. C-2.
C lit blPark . . . . 1-20
Comm. Hoop..! Gardena . V-30
Compos Airport . . . . P -3S
Comptes Comm. College - G-311
ComM.. Goll Coors.. . . F-41
CVA Rec.Mis Caster
Del Amo Fasblos Center . L-24
Domingwe. Coll Corse . . K-32
Domino.. Md.C..a.r . .11-35
El Cambia Cell.ge . . . . 0.07
EI Dorado Part N 50
El Dorado P.rb C. C. . . . P.40
El Sevin* CMI Hall . C-20
El Seg•edo Coll Range . . 13-22
Ernie Howlett Park . . . .Q-23
Iri.mI.klp C.. Reg. Park . 3.24
C.o.d.s. City Hall . . . . 0-30
Hamilton Bowl . . .5-42
Hotter Cloy Ree. Center . P-30
Harbor -U. C. L. A. Medical
Cotter . . M-31
Harbor Rag. PS. $ G. C. . .Q-31
Hawaiian Gardens Prat
Center M -SI
Hathorne City Hall . . C -2S
Hawthorns Hospital .D-26
Nawlhoroe M.m. Airport .0-377
Hawthorn. Plata C-25
Headwall Park . . . . . M-46
He. rtweil Park C.CM-46
Nene.. Beach CIII Hall 141
Iron -Wood Golf Comma . 0-40
John F.Kea.edy Md.CS.. H-25
Jails Center . . . . . . L-26
Joslyn ltecreMle. Center . C-20
Keiser Permoeente Medical
' Center Q_Il
King Harbor Marin.. K-21
Lakewood Center Mall 5-45
' Lakewood City Hall . .K-46
Lakewood Golf Court.. . 3.-44
La Mired. Cloy Hall . . D-51
L. Mi nada Comm. Hoopltal C -ST
V Mirda Reg. Pk.O C. C. D-50
La. Coach.s Racquet Club 5-27
L..dal• Civic Center . . 0-25
Taint Park V -SI
List Golf Coors F.45
Little Cemp.q of Mary
Hospital L-23
Long Beach City College . M.45
Long Beech City Calle... 5-42
Long Beach Civic Center . T-40
Long Beach Comm. Hoop. . 0-41
' Loop Brach CennMlon
long Beach Historic Site . 3-40
Long Beach Marta .0.41
Long Beach Mo.. Airport . N-44
Long Beach Naval Shipyard 0-31
Long Beach Plaza.. 11-40
Lem loBeach Rec. Pk.i G.C. 0-45
Lo. Ataele. Corry Office
Complex . C-44
Los Angelo. Harbor Cell. R-31
LM negates MarlU..
Moss.m W 32
los Angeles Southwest Coil. B-30
tom Comite. Regional
SOoppq Caster . .
Los Verde. Golf Coors.. U-21
Ly.wod Clty HMI 6
Goodly Cooler . . 5-40
Malaga Park . . . .
M.MaU.. Bosch Civic
Ma.Aaltao Beach Slats PorkE-I3
a•
y t or sr. 14 TN \ �fl'i'I
11r'1"HI®,,,,IIE3L�:IC
!ping!!! s 0 t ego !lT7�
rss-r�
LE ���'EVE
Et. iIV
%M ie �Tlf1C®�A�® 1 EEMRIF si
tk,0, 11115114P.
' iv% iii :®:®g =man MEI
W T.
M.
etie '—�INITI
MIMI! =I Q»I cailirEal
@ 1111151711•1
nil ilii to=t�.v��M1�t1[iiOi�
MI I9Mi3- i=L!-IIMITI Iiii7C!t MIN
-- p3irit rI■M--- —MI MI1flEaP
11,1= wr..^1. mirairummom mil-- _,t rnJ..�. morirE__-' 3m���I
---IWAi[7rdr'd- M- —llr7 —Api
7 1!-w- mrsimmommerun—
HERMOSA
BEACH
,LI�+ sass !'t -i---1 1.11■.
•.,,i-.007,,.., 3.7—immmEJ
s 105 irte MI IlnEngerInrimmil.
R+ l
�ri �r' MIME" Err To 1
` q`i9MEM 1�1GS „Avow. s �W,10 . Miww1aalar limn ,
�rSSmRln. ct^n
lk
�2t10D l V'�'Ca' j�p�e� TVA• �� 1i
TM
TH
7:7
1BOTH
DIF
00
106TH
L
160TH 3200/
RANCE
0
O
Cr
Dpi-
S 20310 ft
REDONDO
BEACH
Manhattan VIHags . . . . 0-21
Marina Pacifica . . . . . T -4T
Marine 3ldiom Ree. Park T-46
M.1 -King Jr.Ge..Hoap• . 5-36
M. omna Palos Verdes
college . . . . . . . W-27
Memorial Moan.of Gard.0 F-3!
Metropolitan State Hosp. . B-52
Norwalk Golf Coarse . . . 13.53
Pacific Hospital . . .. . . 0-40 0-40
Pacific Terrace Harbor .
Palm Bead, Qren•..y
Landing Park . . . . T-34
Palos Verdes Country Club P-33
Palo. Verdes Estste.
City H.H P41
Paramount CR, Hall . . 0-43
Peck Pork. . . 0-30
Penl•uula Center r 3-23
Porprdine Vol.. LAX CanC-21
Point Fermin Park &
lighthouse 2-30
Poled Vitrote County Park .0-20
Port Royal Marina. . . . K-21
nal
Entedr
E�MsAM
'ili'LF[IIi i li
- w VEHi
• iE REV • � ST. P.O.
CARSI
pins o•wl . . .X42 HOLLYWOOD
Portuguese Red Haack
Club . .X-26 RIVIERA
Ponugoe.e Bed Riding
Club . 0-23
Pueblo Recreation Center K-21
Quem Mary U-11
Reecho Los Amigos
County Hospital. B -O
Reecho Palos Verdes •
City Hell V-31
Redondo Beat City Hall K-35
Redondo Beach Marls . K-31
Redondo Beach State Park N-23
Continued on B-44
Molag,''- t
Cove nt
Moiapo• j
or. ' tr
Algfir:Na1/442
2415
Flat Rook Pohl
• PALOS VERDES B
0
areW��4aa.+
Wel
• tar.
J tae
•
^4 J
o Ernie
yO Er°e:Howlettt
'1 he
1s`Ii - .1_40 a PatR
nn.
fhowtha
•obis e/fhhb:,
Hermosa Beach City Council
Civic Center
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Good day,
1246 First St.
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
January 20., 1990
,Ig4122199.0
.
Item " g " on the consent calendar for the January 23 City Council
meeting is an item to approve adoption of the revised Circulation,
Transportation, and Parking Element, draft dated June 1989, prepared
by DKS Associates. I urge you to reconsider approval until such
time as corrections are made to the document pursuant to the issues
I will raise here. I have been writing for two years trying to find
out what the City intends to do about traffic on south Prospect
Avenue, and I want to point out a number of inconsistencies and
shortcomings in the Circulation Element with regard to south
Prospect (from Aviation to Anita/190th).
In short, south Prospect, a narrow, concrete, collector in a
residential area, has the highest non -PCH peak traffic volume in
town. The updated Circulation Element, however, pays short shrift
to this roadway --- and the document uses invalid and apparently
fabricated numbers in its analysis of through (commuter) traffic.
The Circulation Element is deficient and inconsistent in addressing
the traffic on south Prospect, and approving the draft without
demanding corrections or clarifications would be a disservice to
Hermosa Beach and its residents.
In my letter to Mr. Schubach on August 2, 1989, I pointed out one
such inconsistency and suggested that the City have DKS take action
to correct it. Although I was assured in a later later from
Mr. Northcraft that all of my letters had been passed on to DKS, an
inspection of the document shows that nothing was done (this was in
regard to Table 10, which I will discuss, unfortunately, at length).
Without justification or correction, the document remains
inconsistent and (at least with respect to addressing south Prospect
circulation properly) of dubious validity. If the City is to base
its future actions on such a document, the results may be to the
detriment of the City and its residents.
I apologize for the length of this letter, but I feel that the City
has neglected its duty to oversee traffic circulation and
accommodate the residents and businesses of Hermosa Beach. By SUPPLEMENTAL
„pPCMET Al
INFORWiTION
tg
allowing south Prospect, a collector street, to function as an
arterial for the benefit of Redondo Beach and South Bay commuters
and to the detriment of Hermosa residents, and businesses, the City
has neglected its duty on all sides. Given that updates to the
Circulation Element are not timely (twenty years maximum) and that
ten years have elapsed since the last update and the last attempt to
address traffic on south Prospect, it is important to ensure that
the draft element you approve is a complete, consistent document ---
and, at least with respect to south Prospect, with the highest peak
traffic volume in the City except for PCH, the document before you
is not yet complete nor consistent.
I have included copies of select pages from the Circulation Element
with appropriate highlighting, and I will address the following
areas:
1. The "collector" status of Prospect.
2. Peak traffic volumes on Prospect make it important.
3. Table 10 (Through Traffic) is invalid for Prospect.
4. Reliance on invalid figures discounts reliability of future
traffic projections on Prospect (Tables 11 and 16, Table 3 in
Appendix A).
5. License plate survey was flawed with respect to Prospect.
6. Further inconsistencies found in Appendix A.
7. Unfinished business concerning Prospect remains from 1979
update.
8. Some items from Council hearing.
9. Some concluding remarks.
1. Collector Status of Prospect. On page 17 of the main body of the
draft, collector streets are defined. Such streets are intended to
carry local traffic between residential streets and arterials. Note
that federal guidelines constrain traffic volumes on collector
streets to "below approximately 15,000 vehicles per day in order to
maintain acceptable levels of service at intersections and an
environment compatible with residential land uses." It further
states that higher volumes "may be acceptable on certain collector
streets such as those with fronting commercial development or extra
wide cross sections."
As is seen on page 19 and elsewhere, Prospect Avenue is a collector
street. This is an inconsistency. As is seen in Table 2, south
Prospect has a daily volume of 17,230 --- about 15% over maximum
collector capacity. Further examination of Table 2 shows that no
other street in Hermosa except PCH has a higher peak hour traffic
volume (1930 vehicles). Table 1, characterizing the streets, shows
that south Prospect is one of the City's smaller streets, two lanes
of concrete a mere 30 feet wide. There is no fronting commercial
development nor is there an extra wide cross section.
2
It is further clear from Figure 4, "Roadway Capacity Ranges for
Varying Levels of Operation," that even a two-lane arterial with
the traffic volume of south Prospect would be operating in a
"Restricted Conditions (Demand exceeds capacity) " status. Given a
traffic volume of 17,230, south Prospect would require upgrading to
a 4 -lane arterial to operate in a stable region.
It is apparent from the above that south Prospect is not being used
as a collector and that it is not suitable for the volume of traffic
it is currently allowed to support. It is apparent to local
residents that the use of Prospect is not as a collector but as an
arterial (the function of an arterial, page 17 shows, is "to move
vehicles into and through the City"), used primarily by non -local
traffic to connect from one Redondo Beach arterial to another
(190th, Aviation, 4 -lane Prospect south of 190th). The glut of
non -local traffic is a deterrent to local traffic, defeating the
purpose of the collector classification. Further, it is apparent
from reviewing the Circulation Element that neither the document
the actions of the City have adequately addressed this
inconsistency.
2. Peak Volumes Make Prospect an Issue. As can be seen in Table 2,
south Prospect has a peak hour traffic volume of 1930 vehicles per
hour. From Table 2 in Appendix A, the southbound component of this
peak flow is 970 per hour. This makes south Prospect second only to
PCH in peak traffic volume during rush hour (contrary to common
sense, the 970 number is barely half of the total flow, implying
that there are just as many northbound cars as there are southbound
cars during the afternoon rush hour --- this inconsistency detracts
from the credibility of measurements made and reported in the DKS
document). The southbound flow on PCH is given as 2010 per hour.
From Figure 1 in Appendix A, further refinement is possible: peak
southbound traffic exiting Hermosa Beach is 970 on south Prospect
and 1970 on south PCH. This means that PCH, a four -lane major
arterial, maintained in good condition, is carrying barely twice
that of Prospect, a 30 -feet wide, two-lane, cracked concrete strip
with parking on one side only, in a residential neighborhood. Only
PCH has a higher southbound peak density of traffic, yet Prospect
has been given practically no attention in the Circulation Element.
3. Table 10 (Through Traffic) is Invalid for Prospect. Table 10,
"Southbound Through Trips on City Streets During PM Peak Hour," in
the main body of the document has several problems. Table 10 fails
in several respects to represent accurately and adequately what it
was intended to show: "through" traffic characteristics.
nor
First, the total peak volume given (4275) is inconsistent with
information in Table 3 of Appendix A, where the total existing peak
southbound traffic volume is more correctly represented as 4915 per
hour, fully 15% higher. This due in part to Table 10's use of the
volume for Prospect at Artesia instead of the volume for south
Prospect as the southbound volume on Prospect.
As a result, the traffic volume used for Prospect is misleading.
The 630 figure is the hourly peak traffic volume for Prospect at
Artesia; the more appropriate figure here should have been the
hourly southbound peak volume for Prospect at the south end of town,
a volume fully 50% higher (970 vehicles per peak hour southbound).
A look at Table 2 in Appendix A shows that Aviation was not
considered as generating any through traffic, even though Table 1
shows that southbound traffic movement was supposed to be surveyed
on each of the two days from the Aviation/Prospect corner. It is
unreasonable to assume that no through traffic flows south through
Hermosa via Aviation/Prospect, and the Circulation Element is
deficient in not measuring nor reporting that figure.
As I mentioned in my August 2 1989 letter, the Technical Appendix
data provides no basis for the volume of through traffic shown for
Prospect. Table 2 in Appendix A, "PM Peak Period Southbound
Through Traffic," shows that no through traffic was measured for
south Prospect (two samples were attempted: the first showed no
through traffic, the second is flagged as having been an inadequate
sample size). Yet there is a number given in Table 10 for through
traffic: 44 vehicles per hour! There is no justification for this
number; no data exists that explains where this number came from.
There is no intuitive feel that this number can be correct: why
would Prospect, the south end of which is not only a shortcut on a
major commuter route but also carries more peak traffic than any
other street but PCH, have the smallest percentage of through
traffic in town?
(I have a theory about where the 7% came from: I claim it is a
"cooked" number, derived to fill in a line in Table 10. If the
five percentages above the total in the final column are added, they
sum to 100%. Since these percentages are not with respect to the
same total volume as claimed but instead are with respect to each
individual street, there is no reason for them to add to 100%, yet
they do. This happy coincidence occurs only if the through traffic
percentage on Prospect is 7%, since the others add to 93%. Since
there is no data on through traffic other than zero for Prospect,
according to Table 2 in Appendix A, the number "44" could have
been picked to allow the final column entry to be the 7% necessary
to make the mislabeled final column add to a total of 100%. This is
hypothetical, but in the absence of any explanation from DRS, it
better explains the "7%" figure than anything in the Circulation
Element.)
The figure of 44 cars per hour for commuter traffic on south
Prospect is ludicrous. Anyone who observes that traffic can see
that most of the traffic is in fact through traffic. I live on 1st
Street and travel down south Prospect from Aviation to nearly the
southern edge of the City on a daily basis, and I follow primarily
traffic that never diverts --- the traffic comes from Aviation and
from north Prospect and continues all the way through Hermosa and
out the south end --- from experience, I would bet money on being
able to track 44 "through" trips on south Prospect during rush
hour in less than six minutes, let alone sixty.
Further, there are more errors in the table as shown. The third of
the four columns is mislabeled (the category should be "Through
Trips"). The fourth column figures do not reflect "Through Trips
as % of Total Volume" --- rather, they indicate through trips as a
percentage of the peak hour volumes for that street, not for the
total volume (hence, there is no need for them to add to 100%, as
mentioned above). Continued reliance on this uncorrected table will
add more confusion as time goes on; a representative of DKS has
already used the "7%" figure in hearings before the council in
responding to questions about traffic volumes.'
A more accurate representation of Table 10 would be the following:
Street
PM Peak Hour
Southbound
Traffic Volume
Through
Traffic
Volume
Through Trips
as % of
Street Volume
Through Trips
as % of
Total Volume
PCH
2010
885
44%
19%
south Prospect
970
n/a
n/a
n/a
Manhattan/Hermosa
745
97
13%
2%
Ardmore
710
78
11%
2%
Valley
180
45
25%
1%
Total
4615
n/a
n/a
n/a
Unfortunately, without data for Prospect on through traffic, many of
the above are unable to be calculated. Saying so is preferable to
manufacturing numbers just to fill in the blanks, however.
4. Use of Invalid Figures Discounts Reliability of Future Traffic Projections.
Table 11, "Existing and Projected Future Through Traffic on Key
Routes," in the main report, is flawed because it relies on the
inaccurate figure of 44 vehicles per peak hour for south Prospect.
The additional forecasted traffic is built on an invalid assumption,
as a result, and the validity of this table for south Prospect is
negated.
Table 16, "Existing and Estimated Future Average Daily Traffic
Volume," also does a disservice to south Prospect. The entry for
Prospect is based on the measured volume at the Artesia end, which
is less than 65% of the traffic at the Anita end. The increase in
5
daily volume for south Prospect is biased toward this lower number,
and the situation is made to look less a problem than it actually
is. Using the same ratio, an entry for Prospect Avenue south of 5th
street, say, would result in a future volume of some 19,000 vehicles
per day --- on a 30 -foot wide, concrete, two-lane street that barely
exceeds half a mile in length.
In Appendix A Table 3, "Forecast Traffic Redistribution," an
inconsistency for traffic on Prospect results from the use of the
invalid "7%" figure discussed above for Table 10. After
constructing the 7% number without valid data, the percentage is
applied here to see how much traffic would be redistributed to PCH
if parking were removed and assuming that all through traffic would
then redistribute to PCH.
This latter assumption, mentioned on page 4 of Appendix A, is at
best a gross simplification. And when the fabricated and obviously
incorrect 7% through traffic figure is extended from its supposed
derivation (volume entering on north Prospect) to the traffic on
south Prospect, it gives a false sense of reality to an imaginary
number --- each time the 7% figure is used, the more it takes on the
quality of real data, and that is both unfortunate and unwise.
Just imagine: at 970 cars per hour peak, using a conservative three
hours for the peak period (which actually extends from 3pm to 7pm),
about 3000 vehicles go south on south Prospect. Of these, we are
expected to believe that 93%, or over 2700 vehicles, are local. If
one recalls that this part of town is primarily low-density
residential and comprises only about 30 blocks, one wonders how this
part of town can produce 2700 vehicles traveling south out of town
before supper, let alone why locals would all want to run their
errands at rush hour.
5. License Plate Survey Flawed. As I wrote in my letter to
Mr. Schubach, September 22, 1989, I believe the procedure used to
measure "through" traffic on south Prospect was flawed in several
respects. First, the traffic was measured during August, when more
commuters are on vacation than in any other month of the year.
Second, I observed the counting procedure, and it was my impression
that the person parked on 1st Street near Prospect doing the
counting was inattentive. Finally, measuring "through" traffic on
Prospect by observing license plates only from Prospect/Artesia and
neglecting the Aviation/Prospect contribution is a significant
detraction from the validity of the numbers (which turned out to
have no basis anyway, given the "zero/insufficient " raw data in
Appendix A Table 2).
The sampling methods used to calculate the figures here are not
adequately described in the document. No standard error is cited,
6
nor is the sample size; consequently, comparisons using this data
will be of dubious fidelity (for example, can the through traffic
measured during the 3-4 pm period be compared with that measured
during the 5-6 pin period with any statistical significance?), and
the confidence in the measured figures is either unknown or
undocumented, or both. Are the numbers of through trips reported
with 95% confidence, based on sample size and technique? Or with
90% confidence? Or with 50%? A reasonable statistical survey would
present enough information to answer the above questions; the
license plate survey in the Circulation Element does not.
6. Further Inconsistencies in Appendix A. Figures 1 and 2 in
Appendix A show a lot of useful information; however, some missing
information is apparent. It is interesting (with regard to the
traffic issue for south Prospect) that no volume figures are
reported in Figure 1, "Existing Southbound PM Peak Hour Traffic
Volume," for Aviation Boulevard, a major contributor to City
traffic (according to Table 16 in the main document, Aviation has
more total daily traffic than any other Hermosa street except PCH).
This omission is further evidence that inadequate attention was paid
to obtaining through traffic data for Aviation and south Prospect
(as seen in Table 2 of this appendix).
On Figure 2, "Percent Through Traffic on PCH and City Streets,"
missing information is again apparent. There are numbers of cars
(from measurements, coinciding with Table 2 of the appendix) shown
in parentheses next to the recorded percentages, except in two
instances: the traffic flow from Aviation to PCH and to south
Prospect. There, only percentages are given, without supporting
data to indicate the measurements made. Since Table 2 shows no data
for this traffic, the most reasonable explanation is that no data
was obtained. The Circulation Element is deficient, and the
percentages shown for Aviation and south Prospect through traffic is
unsupported. If DKS is relying on traffic volume figures from the
1979 update or from other sources and not from direct measurements,
they should make this clear in the Circulation Element draft.
One slight inconsistency observed in comparing the numbers in Figure
2 with the numbers in Table 2 shows that some of the numbers are
from one sampling period (5-6 pm numbers are used for the four PCH
traffic numbers) while others are taken from the 3-4 pm period (the
numbers for Ardmore, Valley, and Hermosa). Apparently, only the
maximum number was used. The result, unfortunately, is that the
results presented in Figure 2 are not internally consistent; they
represent traffic patterns that do not quite exist and hide a
possible trend of later traffic diverting away from
Manhattan/Hermosa and Ardmore (both of which show a significant
decrease in "through" traffic from the earlier measurement period,
as shown in Table 2).
Figure 2 agains shows the "7%" figure, this time showing it to be
representing (apparently) the percentage of Aviation traffic that is
through traffic via south Prospect. This interpretation is
bolstered by the last sentence on page 3 of the appendix. So now
there are three separate definitions for this 7% figure:
• 7% of total southbound Hermosa traffic is "through" traffic on
Prospect (Table 10).
• 7% of southbound peak traffic on Prospect is "through" traffic
(a corrected Table 10).
• 7% of southbound peak traffic on Aviation is "through" and
uses south Prospect (Figure 2 Appendix A).
Add to this my theory about the number's derivation and there are
four definitions to choose from --- and I don't believe any of them
represent anything valid about the through traffic on south
Prospect. The Circulation Element must be corrected to eliminate
these inconsistencies.
7. Unfinished Business from 1979 Update. As seen in Policy 5,
"Left Turn Prohibitions," on page 4 of the main report, a policy
was adopted in 1979 to mitigate commuter traffic congestion on south
Prospect. This policy had three parts:
• Prohibit left turns from Aviation onto south Prospect at peak
hours.
• Establish a divider on Aviation to allow traffic to divert only
at Prospect.
• Evaluate the stop signs on south Prospect.
Of these, the first item was attempted "and later reversed." The
City failed to prohibit turns effectively at Prospect and gave up
trying to address, let alone solve, the problem of traffic on south
Prospect . There is nothing in the Circulation Element to show that
the second and third items of the policy were ever addressed.
Because the second and third items in Policy 5 were never attempted
or were never documented, there is an incompleteness in the
Circulation Element. Further, it should be noted that no Prospect
Avenue intersections were covered in the Element's study of
unsignalized intersections (see Tables 7 and 8, "Unsignalized
Intersection Peak Hour Capacity Analysis" for AM/PM), despite
Prospect having a peak hour traffic volume that exceeds all the
streets that were studied.
8. Notes from the January 9 1990 Council Hearing. During the City
Council meeting on January 9 of this year, the Element was
discussed. Councilmembers Sheldon, Creighton, and Essertier
justifiably expressed disbelief with DKS's numbers with respect to
through traffic, and DKS had no compelling answers. In fact, the
8
DRS representative relied on numbers like the "7%" figure
incorrectly derived for Prospect in making his remarks, this time
using the percentage to represent the amount of traffic on Aviation
that shifts to south Prospect.
Mr. Schubach mentioned at that meeting that there were errors in the
document that needed correction and that more work with the
consultant would be required. I hope that the concerns I have about
adequately and correctly addressing traffic on south Prospect are
included in these corrections.
At one point in the hearing, the DRS representative pointed out that
the Circulation Element will be used as guidance for the City staff
in making day-to-day decisions, based on direction by the City
Council. If invalid or insufficient data exists in the Circulation
Element, neither the Council nor the City and its residents are
well -served. To perform their jobs, the Council must have access to
accurate and complete information; with regard to south Prospect,
the proposed Circulation Element has neither.
Later in the hearing, in regard to changing the classification of
Monterey from a collector to a local street, Mr. Antich pointed out
that because Monterey has a volume that exceeds the maximum for a
local street this would create an inconsistency in the Element. The
City Attorney pointed out that the City has a duty to work toward
making the street fit its designation, specifically with respect to
traffic volume --- that if Monterey were to be classified as a local
street, the City would be obligated to work toward making the
traffic volume fit the designation. I ask that the same
consideration be given to south Prospect: if it is to remain a
collector, the City should take steps to ensure it is used for that
purpose. If it is the City's intent that south Prospect be made
into an arterial based on its volume, then immediate steps should be
taken to make improvements to south Prospect and to allow bordering
residents to take steps to abate the adverse effects of an arterial
through a low-density residential area. Further, a hearing should
be held to receive public input on reclassification. If Prospect is
not to be reclassified and improved, then the City should work
toward reducing the volume and changing the character of traffic on
south Prospect to make its collector designation consistent with its
use. Until such time as either of these paths are taken, there will
remain an inconsistency in the Circulation Element.
9. Concluding Remarks. I have written a dozen letters over the last
two years asking the same question: "What is the City planning to
do about traffic congestion on south Prospect?" The closest to an
answer I have received is that "there are no planned changes
...other than what comes out of current Circulation Element update"
(April 14 letter to me from Mr. Northcraft). Since the update does
not contain any planned changes in this area, and since the update
further confuses the issues in this area by using invalid data, and
since south Prospect has a higher peak traffic flow than any other
street but PCH, and since through traffic is an unwelcome intrusion
in our residential neighborhood and an unfortunate loss of potential
business in commercial -corridor arterials, and since Prospect is not
being used properly, and since the City has a duty to provide
solutions to these problems, I must ask once more:
What is the City planning to do about mitigating traffic
problems on Prospect Avenue south of Aviation?
I have every confidence that City staff are capable of providing
solutions to this problem. I appreciate your consideration of these
issues and I await your reply and your answer,
Yours sincerely,
David R. Suess
cc: Kevin Northcraft, City Manager
Michael Schubach, City Planner
10
)144144
January 4, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the City Council January 23, 1990
SAND & STRAND RUN — PARKING WAIVER
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council waive parking fees and time
limits for meters along Pier Avenue (from Manhattan Avenue to the
Municipal Pier) and on Hermosa Avenue between 8th and 16th
streets during the Sand and Strand Run on Sunday, February 11,
1990 between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and Noon.
BACKGROUND
The Sand & Strand Run is an annual Hermosa Beach event now in its
38th year. The run is unique, consisting of 55% sand and 45%
strand terrain. Please see the attached flyer from last year's
race.
The Sand and Strand Run is sponored by the City of Hermosa Beach
and The Friends of the 1736 House (A Hermosa Beach organization
which benefits victims of domestic violence and child abuse) with
proceeds being divided equally.
ANALYSIS
It is hoped that free parking will encourage more participants.
A similar request to waive parking fees has been made of City
Council in past years and the request has been approved.
Concur:
Mary C ooney
Acting Director Recreation Specialist
Respectfully submitted,
Carol Belser
Kevin B. North4raft
City Manager
eroy4/Staten
General Services
lh
•
Sponsored & Organized
• 1736 Family Crisis Center
• Hermosa Beach Department
of Community Resources
• DeLay's Printing
• South Bay Distance
• Easy Reader
• Good Stuff Restaurant
ENTRY Pre -Registration, Wed., Feb. 1, 1989.
DEADLINE Late Registration up to Race Day, add $2
RUN DATE Sunday, February 5, 1989 (rain or shine)
TWO RACES 8 a.m. Local 2.5 Mile Run (residents of
2.5 Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach and
Redondo Beach only).
5.0 9 a.m. TAC sanctioned 5.0 Mile run (Open
to all.)
RACE SITE South side of Hermosa Beach Municipal
Pier at the water's edge — start/finish line.
RACE Sand (55%) and Strand (45%). See map on
COURSE reverse side.
RACE DAY
INFO
AWARDS
PARKING
FAMILY
TEAMS
Proceeds to
benefit victims of
child abuse and
domestic violence and
the Department of
Community Resources.
Runner's numbers are to picked up at race
site on morning of the race.
For the 2.5 Mile Run 7 a.m. til 7:45 a.m.
For the 5.0 Mile Run 7 a.m. til 8:45 a.m.
T -Shirt distribution will follow each race
For all races will be presented at the con-
clusion of the 5.0 Mile run. Special Awards
will be given for 1st and 2nd Place.
Free parking available. See back.
Family Team Awards will be presented
in each of the team categories for the 2.5
mile race only. Each family team consists
of an adult and a child (17 or younger). Both
team members must be registered for the 2.5
Mile Run.
Sanctioned by
The Southern Pacific Association of the Athletic Congress (TAC)
One entry per form)
ENTRY FORM
for 37th Annual Sand & Strand Run in Hermosa Beach
Run Date February 5, 1989
LAST NAME
ADDRESS
FIRST NAME
INITIAL
0
CITY
l�
MO
BIRTHDATE
DAY
FEE (check one)
❑ 2.5 Mile Race
0 5.0 Mile Race
0 Both Races
AGE
PHONE
STATE
IT
ZIP'
YR. (ON 2/5/89)
PRE- LATE
REG. REG.
$10.00
$10.00
$12.00
$12.00
$12.00
$14.00
FAMILY TEAM ENTRY. NO ADDITIONAL COST.
❑ Both Team Members Male
0 Both Team Members Female
0 One Member Male one Member Female
PRINT NAME OF YOUR TEAM MEMBER
LAST NAME
Make check payable to:
Hermosa Beach Sand & Strand Run
Fees are non-refundable
`SEX
El El
MALE FEMALE
DIVISION (check one)
a 0 12 & under
b 0 13 - 15
c 0 16 - 18
d 0 19 - 21
e 0 22 - 29
FIRST NAME
f 0 30 - 39
g 0 40 - 49
h 0 50 - 59
i❑60-69
j 0 70 plus
AGE
Mail to: Friends of 1736
c/o Hermosa Beach Sand & Strand Run
P.O. Box 862
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
❑ Please accept my additional donation of $ for the victims of Family Violence and the city of Hermosa Beach.
PLEASE SIGN WAIVER ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE SENDING APPLICATION.
Water's edge
r
N.S.
Pier
r
Waters edge
1
The Strand
•
1 kip equals 2.5 mile,
PARKING
On Race Day FREE Parking will be available from 7 am - 12 noon
along Pier Avenue (from Manhattan Avenue to the Municipal Pier)
and on Hermosa Avenue between 8th and 16th Streets.
LIABILITY WAIVER FOR HERMOSA BEACH SAND & STRAND RUN
In consideration of the acceptance of this entry in the Hermosa Beach Sand and Strand Run to be held on Sunday, February 5, 1989 in
Hermosa Beach, Califomia, we the undersigned participant and (if participant is under 18 years of age) parent or guardian, intending to
be legally bound, do hereby for ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators waive, release and forever discharge any and all
rights or claims for damages, which we, or either of us, may have or which may hereafter accrue to us, or either of us, against any and
all persons, organizations and legal entities, affiliated with said race and, more particularly, the Southem Pacific Association of the
Athletic Congress, its officer, agents and employees; the Long Distance Running Committee; the South Bay Distance Runners; the City
of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees; the 1736 Family Crisis Center, its officers, agents and employees; DeLay's
Printing, its officers, agents and employees; together with their representatives, successors„assigns and/or sponsors for any and all
damages which may be sustained or suffered by us in connection with or entry in, and/or arising out of our traveling to, participation
in and retuming from said Hermosa Beach Sand and Strand Run. UWe attest and verify that I am or we are physically fit and have
sufficiently trained for this competition.
SIGNED Date
Parent or Legal Guardian Date
(is required in addition to signature of participant if participant is under the age of 18 years)
January 16, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 23, 1990
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL IN RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS REGARDING AWARD
OF AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
COMMUNITY CENTER ELECTRICAL UPGRADE, CIP 89-613
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council:
1. Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement for preliminary
Engineering Services with John Snyder and Associates at a
cost of $ 5,880.
2. Authorize staff to issue addenda within budget limitations.
Background:
On January 9, 1990, staff recommended to the City Council that
they authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement for preliminary
engineering services on the Community Center Electrical Upgrade
to John Snyder and Associates at a cost of $5,880.
City Council tabled the memorandum and directed staff to answer
questions at the next meeting
Analysis:
The following is a response to questions raised in the January 9,
1990 meeting.
1. Why would we need an update of the electrical system such a
short time after the major remodel?
Only the Community Center Theatre was remodeled in 1983. The
electrical work at that time involved replacing lighting
fixtures, lighting conduit, wiring and panels for lighting in
the auditorium, stage, concession stand, foyer, catwalks,
ticket booth and restrooms. Electrical work also included
the theatre audio system and power in the auditorium fan
room. None of the rest of the buildings at the Community
Center had any electrical work done.
In the interest of reducing costs, the changes to the
electrical system in the Theatre were only within the service
side of the system. The incoming power side of the system
was not increased at the time of the remodeling. Thus, the
service requirements have exceeded the existing electrical
incoming capacities within the theatre and the other
Community Center buildings. The Community Resources staff
has observed overloading of circuits evidenced by:
(a) smoking wire insulation
(b) tripped circuit breakers
(c) loss of lighting
(d) loss of power
According to the Community Resources Department, production
companies leasing the facility have been unable to operate
their equipment at more than 60% capacity. The Theatre is
operating with only three power packs for stage lighting,
while ten power packs should be used.
Also according to the Community Resources Department; since
computer terminals have been installed at the Community
Center, power outages have occurred in the offices. When
the Kiwanis Christmas tree lot is in operation outside, the
extra .load causes power outages inside the Community
Center Buildings.
The Community Center buildings were constructed between 1935
and 1939 and except for remodeling of the Theatre, most of
the wiring and panels are from 51 to 55 years old. In the
interest of the public safety, a thorough inspection of the
total electrical system in all of the buildings is needed.
2. How much should have been done during the remodel?
Only the Theatre was remodeled. The other buildings at the
Community Center were not touched. The purpose_of this study
is to determine just how much work is needed on the
electrical system in all of the buildings.
The supply side of the system should have been upgraded at
the time of the Theatre remodeling. This would have involved
increasing the size of the feeder from Southern California
Edison's power line and increasing the size of the electrical
panels. This work still needs to be done.
3. Was the previous electrical contractor obligated?
The contractor for the remodeling did the work he was
required to complete. The contractor for the Community
Center Theatre Renovation was obligated to construct the
project according to the limited plans and specifications
approved in 1983.
4. Explain the difference in estimated hours shown on Attachment
HAI' (84 hrs. to 470 hrs.)
The estimated hours are from each of the four Consultant's
proposals for the preliminary engineering. The two
consultants who were the most familiar with the Community
Center Buildings and had inspected the site, estimated 84 and
130 hours respectively. Lima and Associates did not inspect
the site and estimated 470 hours, proposing services beyond
the scope of service in the Request for Proposals.
5. What is the Community Center cost versus revenue?
Attached is a report prepared by the Department of Community
Resources Commission and the Hermosa Beach Community Center
Foundation detailing cost versus revenue (see page 4 of the
report) for FY 87-88.
Projected Department of Community Resources revenue totals
for Fiscal Year 1989-90 are currently $ 207,000. 1989-90
appropriations total $ 350,000.
4011110 M•••••r
r w.w
HERMOSA BEACH
COMMUNITY CENTER
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Frans
EXPENDITURES
General Operation: $96,500
(30% of Department of Community
Resources Budget)
Public Works Department Support:
$125,000
General Operation
39%(596,500)
Public Works Support
50% (125,000)
Rentals
35%
$48,000
Civic Theatre
12%
$15,000 Tennis Courts
8%
$11,000
(Labor and Materials)
Utilities:
(Gas, electric, water)
Capital improvements: $8,500
(Major equipment purchases or remodel
or new construction) •
$20,000
REVENUE
Community Center Leases: $62,000
Community Center Rentals: $48,000
Community Center Theatre: $15,000
Community Center Tennis Courts:
$11,000 ..
TOTAL; $250,000
TOTAL: 136,000
The only significant change in the cost has been the purchase and
installation of the air conditioning for the Theatre which was
- 3 -
funded by both the City and Community Center Foundation. Actual
Revenue from the Community Center increased from FY 87-88 to
FY 88-89 by 14%. -
Alternatives:
Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council
are:
1. Drop this project.
2. Award the agreement to a different consultant.
Respectfully Submitted,
i;
5;,
Brian Gengler Lyn A. Terry
Assistant Engineer Dep
Noted For Fiscal Impact:
Concur:
Viki Copeland
Director of Finance
City Engineer
Ant t'ny Antich
Director of Publib Works
4,,
Mary *•o
Acti • Director of Community
Reso rces
evin B. Northcraft
City Manager
Attachments: Staff report for Award of Agreement for Engineering
Services from January 9, 1990 meeting
Snyder and Associates Proposal
Joint Presentation to the Hermosa Beach City
Council by the Department of Community Resources
Commission and the Hermosa Beach Community Center
Foundation
City, Managers Comment: The original request for this project was
for $ 90,200. Due to budget constraints and a difficulty
prioritizing the needs versus competing requests, only the
preliminary engineering was funded. Information from these
services will help us determine the whole project's priority as
part of the City's annually revised, Five Year Capital
Improvement Program.
ty/aaes
December 14, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 9, 1990.
AWARD OF AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES,
COMMUNITY CENTER ELECTRICAL UPGRADE, CIP 89-613
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council:
1. Authorize the Mayor to sign the attached agreement for
Engineering Services for Community Center Electrical Upgrade
to John Snyder and Associates at a cost of $ 5,880.
2. Authorize staff to issue addenda within budget limitations.
Background:
Deficiencies of the existing electrical system in the Community
Center Theatre have led to problems including power outages,
especially during performances that require extra stage
equipment. In addition, the Community Center buildings were
constructed as early as 1935 and a thorough inspection of the
existing electrical system is needed.
On September 26, 1989, City Council authorized staff to request
proposals for engineering services on this project. The work
involves identifying deficiencies of the various electrical
systems within the Community Center buildings and submitting a
report on how to correct those electrical deficiencies.
Analysis:
Four proposals were received by the due date of November 13,
1989:
1. John Snyder & Associates
2. Dalan Engineering
3. Nikolakopolus & Associates
4. Lima & Associates
Proposed Amounts
$ 5,880
$ 12,000
$ 15,000
$ 22,650
All proposals are available for review in the Office of the City
Clerk.
All four firms specialize in electrical engineering and are
qualified to do the work. Refer to Attachment "A" for a
comparison of the firms.
- 1 -
. �...:�..........,::.��>..:.;d..i�:i.�M.rit.isms::.:;u�:.�ade'iSY.i$;+4i.d:SwF.s.->;:,.�i,:iil.�.�a�'im✓r
Staff recommends awarding an
Associates for the following
1. John Snyder & Associates
amount of $ 8,000.
2. John Snyder & Associates
satisfaction on previous
City Hall.
Fiscal Impact:
Proposed Amount
Contingency
Not -to -Exceed Amount
FY 89-90 Budget
Funding Source: General Fund
Alternatives:
Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council
are:
1. Drop this project.
2. Award the agreement to a different consultant.
agreement to John Snyder &
reasons:
is the only firm within the budgeted
has performed work to the City's
projects at the Community Center and
$ 5,880
2,120
$ 8,000
$ 8,000
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian Gengler
Assistant Engineer
Noted For Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Director of Finance
ty/cce
Concur:
Lyn nr A. Terry
Deput City Engineer
i 'l:4 t
An` mony Antich
Director of Public Works
‘>/-/Pger--3--
evin B. Northc ft
City Manager
/Ace
Alana Mastrian-Handman
Director of Community Resources
- 2 -
ATTACHMENT tlAIS
CIP 89-613
COMMUNITY CENTER ELECTRICAL UPGRADE
COMPARISON OF CONSULTANTS FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
Consultant
Snyder
Dalan
Nikolak-
opolus
Lima
Bid Amount
$ 5,880
$ 12,000
$ 15,000
$ 22,650
Estimated Time(hrs.)
84
130
?
470
Composite Hourly Rate
$ 70.00
$ 92.30
?
$ 48.19
Within Budget?
YES
NO
NO
NO
Registered Engineer?
YES
YES
YES
YES
Previous Theatre
Experience?
YES
NO
YES
NO
ty/ccea
- 3 -
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
COMMUNITY CENTER ELECTRICAL UPGRADE, CIP 89-613
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 9th day
of January , 1990 by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a
Municipal Corporation hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and
John Snyder & Associates , hereinafter
referred to as "CONSULTANT".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform
(description of work) as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached
hereto and incorporated herein and by this reference made a part
hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. CITY agrees to retain CONSULTANT to perform services as
herein set forth.
2. CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to com-
plete in a manner satisfactory to CITY the services set forth in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein
and made a part hereof.
3. All information, data, reports and records and maps as
are existing and available from CITY, and necessary for carrying
out the work outlined in Exhibit
IIA"
shall be furnished to CON-
SULTANT without charge by CITY and CITY shall cooperate in every
way reasonable in the carrying out of the work without delay.
- 1 -
4. CONSULTANT represents that it employs, or will employ
at is own expense all personnel required in performing the ser-
vices required under this Agreement.
5. All of the services required hereunder will be per-
formed by CONSULTANT or under its direct supervision, and all
personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall
be authorized or permitted under state and local 'law to perform
such services.
6. CITY's Director of Public Works (the "Director" or his
designee) shall direct the CONSULTANT to proceed and the work
required shall be completed within the time limit mutually agreed
upon. CONSULTANT shall have no claim for compensation for any
services upon which the Director has not authorized CONSULTANT to
proceed.
7. The CONSULTANT shall work closely and cooperate fully
with the Director, or his designee, who shall be the liaison
between CONSULTANT and the CITY and who shall review and approve
all details of the work as it progresses.
8. The CITY reserves the right to terminate or suspend
•
the Agreement at any time upon seven (7) days written notice ef-
fected by personal delivery or by a bona fide mail service, which
shall be deemed communicated as of the date of receipt thereof,
under any of the following circumstances but not limited to:
(a) The project, as described in the attached Exhibit
"A", is to be abandoned or indefinitely postponed.
(b) CONSULTANT fails to prosecute the work within the
time limits specified in the attached Exhibit "A".
(c) Unsatisfactory performance by CONSULTANT.
- 2 -
.._,..»-�.t..,...v...-::=......,..:ns:ahait:a;:s - -e:eriani+4iiiea..
9. No change in the scope of the work to be performed by
CONSULTANT shall be made except in writing between CITY and CON-
SULTANT, which shall set forth the changes mutually agreed upon
by the CITY and the CONSULTANT.
10. In accordance with State Compensation Laws, the
CONSULTANT shall carry Worker's Compensation insurance for all
persons employed in the performance of services as set forth
herein. The CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with a certificate
verifying such coverage or endorsement acceptable to the CITY
before commencing services under this Agreement. Such policy
shall require thirty (30) days notice to the CITY in writing
prior to cancellation, termination, or expiration of any kind.
11. The CONSULTANT shall carry General Liability insurance
in an amount of not less than $500,000. The CONSULTANT shall
provide the City with certificates verifying such coverage or
endorsement acceptable to the City before commencing services
under this Agreement. Such policy shall require thirty (30) days
notice to the City in writing prior to cancellation, termination
or expiration of any kind.
12. If CONSULTANT fails to maintain such insurance, the
CITY may obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount
of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this
Agreement.
13. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limit-
ing in any way the extent to which CONSULTANT may be held respon-
sible to payment of damages to persons or property resulting from
3
...�.:.ee..•.,........,
its operations or any operations of any subcontractors under it.
CONSULTANT shall idemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers
and employees from any claims, damages, or expenses, including
attorney's fees and court costs, arising out of CONSULTANT'S
negligent performance under this agreement.
14. In the event that legal action is commenced to enforce
or declare the rights created under this Agreement, the prevail-
ing party shall be entitled to an award of costs and reasonable
attorney's fees in the amount to be determined by the court.
15. The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or
any part of the work performed under this Agreement at the rates
and in the manner established in the attached Exhibit "A".
16. This Agreement shall begin upon execution and shall
expire on the date shown on the Notice to Proceed unless extended
in writing by mutual agreement of both CITY and CONSULTANT.
17. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and
assigns of the parties, but it shall not be assigned by the CON-
SULTANT without the written consent of the CITY.
18. The CONSULTANT shall not assign, any interest in this
Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same
(whether by assignment or otherwise) without the prior written
approval of the CITY, provided, however, that claims for money
due or to become due the CONSULTANT from the CITY under this
Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other
financial institution or to a Trustee in Bankruptcy, without such
approval. Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be
furnished promptly to the CITY.
- 4 -
i:V._
,..t 6.`.:i&iw'siMeWrcaSc.�J:'e�c•..,�u.s..:ca3yr.a•�'1/�i�
19. No member of the governing body of the CITY and no
other officer, employee, or agent of the CITY who exercises any
functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and
carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial
interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and the CONSUL-
TANT shall take appropriate steps to assure compliance.
20. The CONSULTANT covenants that he presently has no
interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect,
which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance
of his services hereunder. The CONSULTANT further covenants that
in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such
interest shall be employed.
21. This agreement supercedes any and all other agreements,
either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with
respect to the employment of CONSULTANT by CITY and contains all
the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to
such employment in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this
Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements,
promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by
any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not
embodied herein, and that no other agreement or amendment hereto
shall be effective unless executed in writing and signed by both
CITY and CONSULTANT.
22. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all ap-
plicable federal statutes and regulations as amended.
23. The invalidity in whole or part of any provision of
.. X»./.aR1M�•`ii.�.+M�.i'-.�3gliMirwfi4 �''"�.ir1�2f�ilii3fA6��.JWu 11 WfJ../li
this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable
federal statutes and regulations as amended.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement on the date and year first above written.
ATTEST:
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
A Municipal Corporation
By:
MAYOR, City of Hermosa Beach
By:
CONSULTANT
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONSULTANT
- 6 -
..-x«""a,iwlY G:..S<KY.S[:w�a.�Yi✓i4
M•
Exhibit "A"
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES,
COMMUNITY CENTER ELECTRICAL UPGRADE, CIP 89-613
ENGINEERING SERVICES
The consultant shall provide professional engineering services
for preliminary engineering on upgrading the electrical systems
in the Community Center Buildings.
The scope of service shall include, but is not limited to. the
following minimum tasks:
1. Meet with the City as required to identify and establish
both code requirements and City needs, both present and
projected, for the electrical systems.
2. Conduct a complete survey of existing electrical systems
throughout the Community Center Buildings and determine where
existing and future deficiencies are located.
3. Coordinate with Southern California Edison to determine
requirements for electric services.
4. Prepare a written report discussing the identified
deficiencies, needs and requirements while at the same time
providing alternatives for design and/or
other recommendations.
5. Submit preliminary construction cost estimates for each
design alternative.
6. Take footcandle readings throughout the buildings to
determine if light levels are adequate.
7. Check electrical energy consumption and demand to determine
if there are any unusual costs that could be corrected.
8. All work shall be completed within the time limits specified
and mutually agreed upon, as shown on the Notice to Proceed.
AGREEMENT COSTS
The above services -shall be performed on an hourly basis with a
maximum limit of $ 5,880.00 (Five Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty
Dollars). A breakdown of costs is as follows:
Engineer 72 hours @ $ 75.00 per hour = $ 5,400.00
Draftsman 12 hours @ $ 40.00 per hour = $ 480.00
- 7 -
•
JOHN SNYDER & ASSOCIATES
eonsuLtin9 aeet7icaL GnginEva
November 6, 1989
City of Hermosa Beach
Public Works Department
1315 Valley Drive, Room 101
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
Attention: Mr. Anthony Antich
Director of Public Works.
Re: Proposal For Engineering Services
Community Center Electrical Upgrade
CIP 89-613
RECEIVED
NOV 81989
PUBt iC WORKS DEPT.
Dear Mr. Antich:
A
We are pleased to present our proposal to provide electrical engineering services
as outlined in your Request For Proposal for the above referenced subject.
Since our beginning in 1958 we have provided electrical engineering services for
nearly every type of construction project. We have a staff of 18 people consisting
of 11 graduate engineers, two of whom are registered.
Some similar projects we have completed are:
Bristow Park Community Center - Commerce, California.
Hoover High School - Auditorium & Stage Lighting - Glendale, California.
Horace Mann Junior High School - 60,000 square feet of Classroom and Auditorium
Los Angeles, California.
Cerritos Library Alterations and Addition - Cerritos, California.
Disneyland Hotel Ballroom (Including Stage Lighting) - Anaheim, California.
Anaheim Hilton Hotel (Including Stage Lighting) - Anaheim, California.
LAX Hilton Hotel (Including Stage Lighting) - Los Angeles, California.
John Nystrom, who is one of the principals in the company, would be assigned to
this project. Mr. Nystrom's resume may be found in the enclosed company brochure.
Our approach to this project will be to make a survey of the buildings focusing
on the following items:
2908 North Naomi Street
• Burbank, California 91504 • (213) 877-0981
Exhibit "A" (page 1 of 2)
(818) 953-4214
November 6, 1989
City of Hermosa Beach
Page 2
Re: Proposal For Engineering Services
Community Center Electrical Upgrade
CIP 89-613
1. Size and capacity of electrical services, condition and ratings of main switch-
boards.,distribution equipment and panelboards.
2. Locations, ratings, number of circuits and condition of branch circuit lighting
and power panelboards.
3. Take footcandle readings throughout the buildings to determine if light levels
are adequate.
4. Check condition of lighting fixtures.
5. Check for electrical code violations.
6. Check condition of dimming equipment, patch panels, lighting fixtures, controls,
etc. for stage lighting in the Theater.
7. Check electrical energy consumption and demand to determine if there are any
unusual costs that could be corrected.
8. Check general condition of receptacles, switches and other electrical devices.
A report will be made pointing out deficiences in the present system and recommend
changes for improvement. The recommended changes will be broken down into
components or alternatives and preliminary construction cost estimates will be
provided.
The above services shall be performed on an hourly basis not to exceed $5,880.00
(Five Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty Dollars). A breakdown of costs is as follows:
Engineer 72 hours @ $75.00 per hour = $5,400.00
Draftsman 72 hours @ $40.00 per hour = $ 480.00
If there is any further information you may require please let me know.
Very truly yours,
JOHN SNYDER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Snyder P.E.
President
Enclosure
Exhibit "A" (page 2 of 2)
RECEIVED
JAN 1-7 1990
?UDI ►D WORKS. DEPT:
JOINT PRESENTATION
TO
THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
BY
THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES COMMISSION
AND
THE HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION
Submitted
6-14-88
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHARTS
COMPOSITION OF ORGANIZATIONS AND PROGRAMS
DEPT. OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES STAFF
RESPONSIBILITIES BY FACILITY AND FUNCTION
COMMUNITY CENTER FINANCIAL REVIEW
COMMUNITY CENTER UNREALIZED REVENUE
FOUNDATION FINANCIAL.REVIEW
BENEFITS AND GOALS
LIST OF COMMISSIONERS
LIST OF FOUNDATION BOARD MEMBERS
PAGE
1
2
3
5-6
7
8
9
10
OBJECTIVES
Community Resoilr es
Advisory Commisi n
Act in an advisory capacity to the
City Council in all matters '
pertaining to the Department of
Community Resources in an effort
to develop sound leisure, cultural
social service and educational
programs.
Department
of
Community Resources
Organizational Chart
FY 87/88
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS f.
CITY MANAGER
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
ADVISORY COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT
COORDINATOR
FULL TIME
RECREATION
STAFF
PART TIME
STAFF
1
THEATRE
TECHNICIANS
DEPARTMENT
CLERICAL
CONTRACT
PERSONNEL
�Qlilld \)Le (..,\. t.
h�.t.
pic.IC �(-e-L
6,1N ¶;;
(Vow �' ,�pyl_, ��t6
.Vo
Hermosa Beach
Community Center Foundation
The purpose of the Foundation is to
raise funds for programs, capital
improvements and operating •
expenses required by the Community
Center to serve the South Bay
population.
Hermosa Beach
Community Center Foundation
Organization Chart
FY 87/88
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DEPT. OF
COMMUNITY
RESOURCES
STAFF
OFFICERS
VICE PRESIDENT
ORGANIZATION
COMMITTEE
OMMITTEES
'ROGRAM
COMMRTEE
ADVERTISING,
MARKETING
cf'MMITTFF
Composition of Organizations
Department of
Community Resources
Advisory Commission
• 5 member Commission
• Appointed by City Council
• Hermosa Residents only
• Advise City Council on Matters
pertaining to:
• Leisure Programs
• Park Development
• Recreation Facility Management
• Works through the Department of
Community Resources
Department of
Community Resources
Hermosa Beach
Community Center
Foundation -
• Up to 21 members
• Approved by Board of Directors
• No Residency requirement
• Non -Profit Corporation
• Purpose is to raise funds to support the
Hermosa Beach Community Center in:
• Program Development
• Capital Improvements
• On-going operating costs.
PROGRAMS
Surf Festival
Amateur and Professional Beach
Volleyball Tournaments
Concerts on the Green
Summer Park Program
Senior Citizen and Youth Excursions
Senior Citizen Cheese Distribution Program
Softball Leagues
Children's Theatre Series
Sand and Strand Race
Easter Egg Hunt
Filming Permits Processing and
Supervision
Special Event Permit Processing and
Supervision
Park Permit Processing
Facility Reservations:
Community Center (Meeting Rooms,
Dance Studio, Theatre and Gym)
Clark Field
Clark Building
Hermosa Beach
Community- Center
Foundation
Entertainment Series
Holiday Concert
Fiesta de les Artes
Film preview
Garage Sale
Membership Drive
Sponsorship Solicitation
HERMOSA BEACH
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES
STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES
BY FACILITY
FY 1987/88
HERMOSA, BEACH
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES
RESPONSIBILITIES
BY FUNCTION •
FY 1987/88
ADMINISTRATION
• 15%
FOUNDATION
27%
SPECIAL
EVENTS
20%
RECREATION
PROGRAMING
10%
RENTALS/
RESERVATIONS
28%
HERMOSA BEACH.
COMMUNITY CENTER
FINANCIAL REVIEW
FY 87/88
EXPENDITURES
General Operation: $96,500
(30% of Department of Community •
Resources Budget)
Public Works Department Support:
$125,000
Utilities
8% ($20,000)
Capital Improvements
3% (8,500)
Public Works Support
50% (125,000)
(Labor and Materials)
Utilities:
(Gas, electric, water)
Capital improvements: $8,500
(Major equipment purchases or remodel
or new construction) •
$20,000
REVENUE •
Community Center Leases: $62,000
Community Center Rentals: $48,000
Community Center Theatre: $15,000
Community Center Tennis Courts:
$11,000
Rentals
35%
$48,000
Civic Theatre
12%
$15,000 Tennis Courts
8%
$11,000
TOTAL; $250,000
TOTAL: 136,000
Y
UNREALIZED REVENUE
Unrealized revenue represents the City's subsidy for local non-profit organizations.
Said subsidies are approved by the City Council.
The Breakdown of unrealized Revenue is as follows:
Community Center Leases: $10,700
Community Center Rentals: 28,800
Community Center Theatre: 13,500
Community Center Offices and Storage: I 25,000
TOTAL: $78,000
SUMMARY
Projected Revenue: •
Unrealized Revenue:
Operating Costs:
Operating Deficit:
$136,000
. 78,000
$214,000
$250,000
• $36,000
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES
UNREALIZED REVENUE
--FISCAL YEAR 1987/88
COMMUNITY CENTER MEETING ROOMS/GYMNASIUM
Sister Cities Organization $ 800
Chamber of Commerce 1,000
City: Misc Meetings and Testing 7,000
Misc. non-profit organization requests 1,200
Commission 800
Foundation 3,000
Youth Basketball League 15,000
COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE:
School District
Foundation
COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES:
Hermosa Beach Historical Society
COMMUNITY CENTER OFFICES AND STORAGE:
CLARK BUILDING:
Senior Citizens Club
Garden Club
Women's Club
Senior Aerobics
Misc. City Testing/mtgs
CLARK FIELD:
Little League
AYSO Soccer
$3,000
10,500
$10,700
$25,000
COMMUNITY CENTER TOTAL:
$14,000
1,200
1,200
1,100
2,000
$28,800
$13,500
$10,700
$25,000
$78,000
$18,500
15,000
10,000 $25,000
GRAND TOTAL: $121,500
6
HERMOSA BEACH
COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION
FINANCIAL REVIEW
EXPENDITURES
-Administration: $8,100
costs for: Licencing, IRS, Professional
Memberships, phone, office supplies,
postage 'and Loan payment to City.
Programs: $68,200
Entertainment series
Holiday Concert
Baroque Concert
Warren Miller Ski Film sneak preview
Fiesta de les Artes .
Concerts on the Green
Garage Sale
Administration
11% ($8,100)
REVENUE
(Actual and In -Kind donations)
Fundraising: $80,000
Ticket sales, sponsorship, ad sales, poster
sales, memberships
Fundraising '
(actual)
$80,000/68%
Volunteer
Hours
Donation
$23,000/19%
Capital
Improvement
D tion•
(actual)
55,00014%
TOTAL: $766,300
In-kind Donations: $10,500
Donated materials, beverages, refreshments
Capital Improvement Donations: $5,000
Funds for Community Center air condition-
ing project
Volunteer Hours Donation: $23,000
Accounting Firm services and miscellaneous
volunteers ($5,000)
Board Members donating time ($18,000)
TOTAL: Actual $85,000
TOTAL: In -Kind: $33,500
BENEFITS
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
COMMISSION
• Provides citizens opportunity to be heard
on recreation/leisure matters.
• Affords City Council guidance in the
development of Parks and Recreation
Programming
COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION
• Ability of raise funds as a tax deductible
non-profit organization.
• A support group to financially assist the
City Council in the development of the
Community Center in Programs, capital
Improvements and On-going operations.
FUTURE GOALS
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
COMMISSION
To advise City Council on:
• Continued improvement of City Parks
• Acquisition of more Parklands
• Recreation Building(s) maintenance and
Capital Improvement Projects •
• Development of more recreation programs
COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION
• To continue to raise funds for the Community;
Center.
• To raise 26/0 of cost for the Theatre Air
Conditioning in next fiscal year.
• To expand the Theatre programming in
next fiscal year to include film festivals
and children's film series.
�.•f -fC.
•
HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION
DIRECTOR
BRAD BAKER
JANE GIERLICH
STEVE IZANT
LEAH MOORE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WORK
BAKER & BURTON
515 Pier.Avenue
Hermosa Beach, 90254
376-9893
CLAUDIA REBMANN -MCA
Universal Amphitheatre
100 Universal City Plaza
Universal City, 91608
(818) 777-4464
GEORGE SCHMELTZER 534-6435
MISSY SHELDON
Realtor
Hermosa Real Estate Co.
1001 Hermosa Avenue
Hermosa Beach, 90254
376-3421
HOME
312 Avenue F
Redondo Beach
90277
1900 Strand
HB,90254
379-3703
57 - 19th Street
HB, 90254
379-9813
1100 Loma Dr.
HB, 90254
379-9677
244 Manhattan Ave..
HB., 90254
(213) 379-0112
515 24th Place
Hermosa Beach,
90254
376-3903
1800 Strand
Hermosa Beach
374-3031
Jo
-
-
_
-
/
�
_
'
`.1411.11F-
,
~
~
January 3, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council January 12, 1990
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL AND AUDIT REPORT
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, including the Audit Report
for 1988-89. A copy of the report is available to the public in
the City Clerk's Office and the public library.
Background
Annually, the` City has a financial audit by an independent
certified public accountant. The firm of Grant Thornton
performed the audit for 1988-89.
The City Council approved preparation of an expanded version of
the report, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), on
October 24, 1989. The primary purpose of the more comprehensive
report is to demonstrate compliance with generally accepted
accounting principles and standards for governmental accounting
and to enhance understanding of the finances of the City.
The report is prepared according to the format recommended by the
Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and in accordance
with all applicable accounting standards. The CAFR has been
submitted for the first time to the national organization, GFOA
and the State organization, California Society of Municipal
Finance Officers (CSMFO) for consideration in their award
programs, for excellence in financial reporting.
Agencies submitting reports for review receive feedback regarding
suggested improvements. Qualifying reports are comparable from
year to year and among agencies because of standards and are more
complete than basic financial statements. Qualifying reports
also provide information needed by bond rating agencies which may
enhance marketing of the agency's securities and may reduce
interest costs.
Analysis
The auditor's report is on page 1 of the CAFR. (General Purpose
Financial Statements tab) The City received an unqualified
opinion for the second time. An unqualified opinion indicates
that the auditor believes that the financial statements present a
fair picture of the financial position of the City, as opposed to
a qualified opinion, in which the auditor qualifies or reserves
his opinion for specific reasons. Only CAFRS with unqualified
opinions are reviewed for the award programs.
- 1 -
The following analysis deals with the General Fund, which is the
main operating fund of the City. Additional analysis can be
found in the Introductory Section of the CAFR.
General Fund Revenue
Revenue received in the General Fund was 5% over budget for
1988-89, due primarily to unbudgeted funds received from
settlement of lawsuits and the change of accounting procedure for
property taxes. Previously, property taxes 'receivable at year
end were recorded based on the statement from the County. Now,
only those amounts to be received within sixty days will be
recorded as required by generally accepted accounting principles.
In order to compare 1988-89 revenue to 1987-88, some adjustments
are necessary. After adjusting for one time revenues such as
lawsuit settlements and the sale of the Seaview Property, the
change in property tax accounting and the change in deposit of
utility user tax receipts from the General Fund to special
revenue funds, revenue shows an increase of 10% over 1987-88.
Property taxes and sales tax both increased by 10%. Building
activity for 1988-89 was significantly higher than 1987-88.
General Fund Expenditures
1988-89 expenditures for the General Fund were 5% under budget,
after allowing for amounts that were reappropriated to the
1989-90 year.
Overall, expenditures increased 11% over 1987-88. The increase
reflects one-time and non-recurring costs as well as operating
costs. The most notable increases, which were approved in the
budget or additionally by the City Council, were in the following
areas:
Public Safety
Culture/Recreation
Public Works
Debt Service
Change from RCC (joint powers
dispatch) to inhouse - additional
personnel and upfront costs
Master plan for parks and
recreation, purchase of screen and
projector for theatre
Medians and Traffic Safety
departments funded by General Fund
rather than State Gas Tax Fund,
which is being used for capital
street improvements
Lease/purchase costsrelated to
computerization of inhouse
dispatching, police vehicles and a
new street sweeper
- 2 -
•
One sizable decrease in costs from 1987-88 that should be noted
is a 40% reduction in legal costs due to completion of several
cases and a change in law firms.
General Fund Fund Balance
The fund balance increased in total 18% over 1987-88. The fund
balance includes amounts totaling $1,674,601, that are designated
by City Council for special purposes. The most significant of
these, the Contingency ($923,297) serves as a "rainy day fund" or
cushion against economic uncertainties or emergencies. The
Contingency amount represents roughly 10% of expenditures.
Summary
In conclusion, the City ended the year with an improved General
Fund position, particularly considering that a few years ago, the
fund balance of the General Fund was approximately $20,000, with
no cushion for uncertainties. The 10% increase in revenue was
healthy but cannot necessarily be expected to continue. Building
activity in 89-90, for example, is remaining constant rather than
increasing and the real estate market has changed considerably
from last year. The General Fund was able to contribute over
$300,000 for capital expenditures while funding several one-time
high priority items such as General Plan amendments and the
Master Plan for Parks and Recreation, however many capital needs
remain unfunded.
Actual fund balances for 1988-89 will be incorporated into the
budget summary presentation for Midyear Budget Review on February
13, 1990, which provides the next opportunity for review of the
City's financial position.
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
CONCUR:
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL
REPORT
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Year ended June 30, 1989
City o f2-iermosarl3eacly
December 19, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
Hermosa Beach, California
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885
I am pleased to submit the first comprehensive annual financial
report for the City of Hermosa Beach. The report covers the
period July 1, 1988 through June 30, 1989. Responsibility for
the accuracy and the fairness of presentation, including all
disclosures, rests with the City. We believe the data, as
presented, is accurate in all material aspects; that it is
presented in a manner designed to set forth the financial
position and results of operations of the City as measured by the
financial activity of its various funds; and that all disclosures
necessary for the reader's maximum understanding of the City's
financial affairs are included.
The report has been prepared following the guidelines recommended
by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United
States and Canada (GFOA). The GFOA and the California Society of
Municipal Finance Officers both have award programs for reports
that substantially conform to high standards of reporting set by
various standard-setting bodies. In accordance with these
standards, the report contains three distinct sections:
1. Introductory Section - letter of transmittal, listing of
principal officers, organization chart.
2. Financial Section - general purpose financial statements,
combining statements (by fund type), individual fund and
account group statements and schedules.
3. Statistical Section - a variety of financial, physicaly
economic and social data presenting trends and other
information intended to provide users with a broader
understanding of the City.
The Reporting Entity
The City of Hermosa Beach is a general law city which was
incorporated on January 14, 1907. The City operates under the
Council -Manager form of government. Hermosa Beach offers a full
range of municipal services including police and fire protection,
planning and zoning, recreation and parks, maintenance of public
works, enforcement of building codes, parking and animal control,
public improvements and general administrative services.
viii
..._..x_c.,..C:ake..+..+:..-..,.a.+.sr..=:.�C: aa�......s.c-.....R.3..—.:..•.. •
Financial information for the Vehicle Parking District, Hermosa
Beach Parking Authority, and the Lighting and Crossing Guard
Districts are included in the City's financial statements as
required by governmental accounting standards. Councilmembers
serve, in a separate session, as the governing board for the
Vehicle Parking District and Parking Authority. The Lighting and
Crossing Guard Districts were created as separate assessment
districts pursuant to Street and Highway Code 22500-22679 and
Government Code 55530-70, respectively, for these specific
purposes.
Economic Condition and Outlook
The City of Hermosa Beach is basically a bedroom community with a
stable population that has increased less that two percent per
year for the past three years. However, being a beach city,
Hermosa does experience a high visitor population and the
associated costs, particularly in the summer.
The City's revenue base is largely dependent on property taxes
(31% of General. Fund revenue) and sales tax (22%). Since the
passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, which limited property taxes
countywide, local control over the increase in these taxes has
virtually been eliminated. The City Council does, however,
retain a certain amount of discretion relating to sales tax
receipts through policy setting.
Real estate values continue to appreciate at a rapid pace,
although there is evidence that the market is slowing and will
level off. The assessed valuation for the City overall rose 6%
over 1987-88. Residential building permit valuations increased
by 16% over 1987-88.
Sales tax receipts increased 12%, largely due to a turnover in
auto dealerships and the addition of quite a few new small
businesses. Auto dealers and eating and drinking establishments
are the highest sales tax generators for the City.
The financial condition of the City has improved over the past
few years. The General Fund fund balance as of June 1989 was
$2,672,870 as compared to $21,235 in 1984-85. The total fund
balance increased 18% over 1987-88, however $1,674,601 is
designated for special purposes. The City has increased its
level of designated funds in the General Fund to provide for
economic uncertainties and emergencies.
While the financial picture for the City is improving, the
delicate balance between the available resources and the level
and quality of service provided requires constant attention.
Maintaining the level of services desired while providing for
deferred infrastructure and facility needs that remain unfunded
is the challenge for the future.
ix
Major Initiatives
Annually, the City Council establishes prioritized goals for the
City. Some of the most significant activities in progress or
completed are listed below, grouped according to functional
activity.
Public Safety
- The conversion to inhouse dispatching services for police and
fire has substantially been completed. The City previously
participated in a joint powers authority with five other cities
to provide these services. The conversion was a cost saving
endeavor.
- In conjunction with the dispatch conversion, the upper floor of
the Police building was remodeled to create a more efficient
work environment. As part of the remodeling, an inadequate
power generator was replaced with an automatic unit that allows
continuation of services under emergency conditions.
- A special narcotics investigations unit was established using
seized and forfeited funds. The funds must be used in
accordance with guidelines established by the U.S. Attorney
General.
- A K-9 unit was added to the Police Department funded
by donations.
- A new firetruck, a Pierce triple combination pumper,
ordered. Delivery is expected in 90-91.
completely
has been
Public Works
- The first five year Capital Improvement Plan was presented,
identifying the City's needs and the level of funding
available.
- In 1984, consultants prepared a report identifying the City's
high priority sewer needs. Including the 8,000 feet
rehabilitated in 1988-89, three miles of the six miles
identified in the report has been completed.
- Consistent with the goal to slurry seal (a form of resurfacing
to extend pavement life) the City's asphalt based streets every
five years, 50% of these streets were done in 1989-89 and 50%
will be done in 1989-90.
Community Development
- The City is actively pursuing compliance with the
State -mandated program to mitigate potential hazards that may
arise from unreinforced masonry buildings during an earthquake.
Staff is identifying the buildings and has hired a consultant
to develop a program. The City anticipates building
modification compliance within_five years.
x
- The General Plan and zoning ordinance have been amended to
provide consistency. This action is in keeping with an
advisory vote of the electorate in 1981 to reduce density, and
with the City Council's goals.
- Phase III of the Coastal Commission program was completed. The
plan implements certified land use.
General Government
- Software was purchased and installed for indexing of City
Council minutes, resolutions and ordinances.
A formal disaster contingency plan was adopted for data
processing. The plan calls for reciprocal arrangements for
computer time with two other agencies in the event that the
City's computers cannot be used due to disaster.
A five year plan for data processing growth is being prepared.
The plan will be presented in the 1989-90 fiscal year.
Software and procedures have been developed to allow for out of
state bail collection on parking citations. The procedures
should allow the City to collect bail that previously was
virtually unattainable.
A program of periodic employee information and training
seminars on benefits and safety issues was begun to enhance
employee awareness.
An "employee of the quarter" program was implemented to
recognize outstanding performance.
Inhouse production of employment bulletins and inhouse testing
procedures were implemented as cost saving measures.
The City implemented sales tax auditing and one time audit of
state subventions (such as motor vehicle revenue). Audits of
parking and tow contracts are ongoing.
- Formulas for distribution of insurance costs to each City
department were developed to present a clearer picture of
department costs and to assist in cost containment analysis.
Culture/Leisure
The City Council reached agreement with the Santa Fe Railway
Company for acquisition of 19.5 acres of open space land
bisecting the City. The purchase will be partially financed by
a pooled issue of certificates of participation through the
Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority.
Recreation programming, both City sponsored and special events,
have increased by approximately 10%. The summer park programs
and pro beach volleyball had attendance figures 20% higher than
anticipated.
xi
- Rental and lease of recreation facilities increased by 15%.
The Community Center has all twelve rooms leased.
- The Community Center Foundation, which is the fund-raising arm
of the Community Center, continues to develop more each year.
The Foundation raised $85,000 for
programs in 1988-89.
For the Future
The City of Hermosa Beach faces many challenges in the upcoming
years. Infrastructure and public facility needs, traffic
congestion, density and open space acquisition are all competing
concerns for limited resources. Some of the major issues to be
considered in 89-90 are:
- Certification of the environmental impact report for
voter -approved oil drilling on City -owned property and
relocation of the City Yard
- Updates of General Plan elements
- Completion of City-wide master long range plans for providing
adequate water flows for fire protection, financing of sewer
rehabilitation, and parks and recreation improvements
- Acquisition of open space and creation of new funds for their
purchase
The City Council has already held the annual goal -setting session
with an additional session scheduled for further refinement.
Joint meetings with the Planning Commis';ion, School District and
Chamber of Commerce have been scheduled to maximize input and
cooperation in developing the best alternatives for meeting the
needs of the citizens of Hermosa Beach.
Accounting System and Budgetary Control
All governmental funds and the agency fund are maintained on a
modified accrual basis, with revenues recognized when
measurable/available and expenditures recognized when incurred.
Proprietary funds are accounted for on an accrual basis of
accounting, with revenues recognized when earned and expenses
recognized when incurred.
Internal controls, an integral part of the accounting system, are
the methods and procedures used to safeguard and maintain
accountability over assets and other resources, and to ensure
that transactions are recorded properly to allow for reliable
presentation in financial reports.
The City Council adopts the annual budget by June 30th of each
year as required by the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. The City
Manager may transfer budgeted amounts between the departments
within each fund, however, transfers between funds require City
Council approval. Revenue and expenditure reports showing budget
to actual comparisons are distributed monthly to the City Council
xii
and all department heads. The City conducts a formal midyear
budget review annually in February. An encumbrance system is
used to record obligations prior to payment as an aid in
controlling expenditures.
General Government Functions
Revenue
The following schedule presents a summary of General Fund and
special revenue funds for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1989,
and the amount and percentage of increases and decreases in
relation to prior year revenues.
REVENUES
All Taxes
Licenses & Permits
Fines, Forfeitures
Use of Money, Property
Intergovernmental
Revenues
Charges for Services
Miscellaneous
Interest
FY 88-89
AMOUNT
7,855,930
296,808
165,139
240,708
1,424,615
436,700
959,657
633.197
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
65.40%
2.47%
1.37%
2.00%
11.86%
3.64%
7.99%
5.27%
TOTAL 12,012,754 100.00%
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
FOR FY_ 87-88
647,159
51,490
(180,527)
(147,051)
541,971
56,358
629,892
266,355
%
OF
INC.
DEC.
6.4%
0.5%
-1.7%
1.4%
5.3%
0.5%
6.2%
2.6%
1,865,647 18.4%
Revenue for the General and special revenue funds increased 18.4%
over 1987-88. The tax category increased 6.4%, primarily due to
the enactment of a voter approved 4% utility user tax. The tax
proceeds will be used to acquire 19.5 acres of railroad
right-of-way property for open space purposes. Intergovernmental
revenues increased 5.3% due to funds being received from the
Federal Emergency Management Agency for repair of storm damage to
the pier and Federal Aid Urban funds being used for traffic
signal improvements and the widening of.a street. The other
notable increase (6.2%) is in the miscellaneous category. One
time revenues were received from the settlement of two lawsuits
and a fire protection fee was implemented to enable the City to
provide adequate fire flows citywide.
Expenditures
The following schedule presents General and special revenue fund
expenditures for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1989 and the
percentage of increases and decreases in relation to the prior
year expenditures.
EXPENDITURES
CURRENT:
Legislative & Legal
General Government
Public Safety
Housing & Community
Development
Cultural & Leisure
Services
Public Works
Sanitation
DEBT SERVICE:
Interest
Principal
Capital Outlay
FY 88-89
AMOUNT
$327,476
$2,206,077
$3,887,606
$451,296
$567,715
$1,255,239
$257,919
$157,767
$139,161
$1,494,577
TOTAL $10,744,833
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
3.048%
20.532%
36.181%
4.200%
5.284%
11.682%
2.400%
1.442%
1.321%
13.910%
100.000%
INCREASE % OF
(DECREASE) INC.
FOR FY 87-88 DEC.
($109,915)
$62,977
$79,840
$55,616
$98,536
$332,108
($5,209)
$157,187
$136,041
($50,562)
- 1.1%
0.6%
0.8%
0.6%
1.0%
3.3%
- 0.1%
$756,619 7.6%
Expenditure levels in the General and special revenue funds
increased 7.6% overall. The Public Safety function, as would be
expected, is the highest area of expenditure at 36% of total
expenditures. General Government, which includes all of the
administrative offices and employee benefits and retirement costs
for the General Fund represents 21% of the total. One goal for
the future is to distribute these costs to all General Fund
departments to present a better picture of total departmental
costs.
The City managed to provide approximately the same contribution
(almost $1.5 million) for capital outlay (capital projects) for
1988-89 as in 1987-88.
Proprietary Operations
The two types of proprietary funds are enterprise and internal
service. Proprietary funds account for operations that are
financed and operated in a manner similar to business
enterprises. The Parking Fund and Transit Fund are enterprise
funds. The Insurance Fund, an internal service fund, accounts
for insurance costs which are reimbursed by user departments.
Parkin g Fund
del parking lot, meter and fine revenue (which was previously
posited to the General Fund) is deposited to the Parking Fund
to finance parking operations and capital improvements. In
**-••••
.-
xiv
-.d � -.. �-� i. i rt1 _ •42�i'AII�M1kr�M�14r�..s�v1i.
accordance with the municipal code, any excess funds are
transferred to the General Fund at the end of the year.
Revenue remained constant for 1988-89, while expenses increased
4%, due mainly to addition of a Field Supervisor and purchase of
new mobile radios. The only funds remaining in the Parking Fund
at year end are reserved for capital outlay.
Transit Fund
Transit revenue consists primarily of Proposition A funds (the
1/2 cent sales tax for Los Angeles County transportation
purposes). The City currently operates a dial -a -ride program and
subsidizes bus passes for senior citizens and students. A
commuter bus to the El Segundo Employment Center (an area of high
employment population) is being developed for implementation in
1989-90.
The Transit Fund shows net income of $116,887 for 1988-89. It is
expected that in the future, however, most available funds will
be expended when the commuter bus program is operational.
Insurance Fund
The Insurance Fund was created to account for costs associated
with the City's insurances: liability, worker's compensation,
unemployment, medicare, auto, property and officials' bonds.
Formulas have been developed to distribute these costs to the
operating departments in the form of a service charge. The
formulas are designed to capture the department's fair share of
costs.
The formulas are being implemented in the 1989-90 year. For
1988-89, insurance costs were funded by the existing equity in
the fund and an operating transfer from the General Fund. The
fund ended the year with total fund equity of $161,841.
Agency Funds
The City offers two deferred compensation plans for employees.
The balance in the fund increased by $134,217, largely due to an
increase in participants and contributions.
Debt Administration
The City has no debt applicable to the legal debt limit (as shown
in the Computation of Legal Debt Margin Statistical Section)
however, descriptions and information regarding long term debt
are found in NOTE I.
Cash Management
The City Treasurer invests temporarily idle funds in accordance
with the State Government Code. The City's formal investment
policy uses an even more cautious investment placement criteria
as authored by the Treasurer and approved by the Council, places
xv
a minimum 5% net asset value requirement on any institutions
before qualifying for investment consideration.
This policy promulgates that, where collateral is required, only
government securities are accepted. Additionally, investment
instruments are limited to U.S. Treasury notes, certificates of''
deposits, corporate notes and the state investment fund. Shown
below are the percentage of idle funds in each instrument
category.
U.S. Treasury Notes
Certificates of Deposit
Corporate Notes
Local Agency Investment Fund
25%
36%
30%
24%
The total amount of interest earned for 1988/89 was $740,512.21
with an average yield of 9%. The average length of maturity on
investments this fiscal year was one 'year.
This significant high level of performance can be attributed to
strong treasury management practices and extensive cooperation
between the Treasurer's Office and Finance Department.
Risk Management
The City obtains its excess liability insurance through the
Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA), a joint
powers authority of medium-sized California municipalities. The
City has a self-insured retention level of $100,000 with excess
coverage to $10 million. The cost of the insurance depends on
both the loss experience of the member cities and the loss
experience of Hermosa Beach. All losses are reviewed and
investigated by the Risk Manager. Claims defense and settlement
are coordinated with the City's third party administrator.
The City also purchases insurance to protect against catastrophic
workers' compensation losses and contracts with a professional
administrator to process claim payments and coordinate recovery
efforts when the injury was the result of third party negligence.
Independent Audit
Annually, the City has an audit of its financial records by
independent, certified public accountants selected by the City
Council. The auditor's report is included within this report.
xvi
•
z
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my appreciation to the staff of the
Finance Department, the City Manager, all department heads and
their staff members and our auditors, Grant Thornton, for their
assistance with the contents of this report. I would also like
to thank the City Council , City Treasurer and City Clerk for •
their support and their continuing service and leadership to the
community.
xvii
Respectfully submitted,
(1
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
1
1
1
,,. •,.a...:,+•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
ORGANIZATION CHART
ELECTORATE
CITE CLERK
CITY CU. CIL
CITE IRIASIRER
1 BOARD 01 APPEALS
1
[PANES B sec AOvISORr COOP 1
CCOMMI It MMIMI
PAILS AND ILICIGTION
►ACILITICS KANACO(DrT
CDLTDRAL/RICILLT 1 ONA1/
ATIETIC PROCIAMMINC
SPICIAL rvDrT1
M IPL RInt CI
PANEIRC DI►ORCDQlT
ANIIMI. CONTROL
CIOSSIPC GUARD
COORDINATION
METER IA1NTTNANCE
DATA PROCESSING
CABLE T.V.
LIAISON
CURRENT PLANNING
ADVANCED PLAJO1INc
ENV1IOIDIDITAL ASS CSSIRNT
C.U.►. DIroacTpIT
TRANSPORTATION
PAIL IC LAWS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
MAI NTENANC E
TRA IV IC
DICINEEA INC
PUBLIC Y/CIt ��--
P'OI.ICI ►Iii
I t
I I
I I
ENTORCDMIIT
1ITUTICATIO1
DETDIT 101
MERGENCE DIS►ATCI
RESERVES
SPECIAL
IRVLTTICATIOIS
P151 sorl{s71o.
rlEVL%TlOR
IESN1
PUBLIC EDUCATION
n BL IC NB/.
PERSONNEL
ADMINISTRATION
TIAP !IPA
ULIOI_ RELATIONS
RISC KMACDSIT
'UDC ITT
ACCOUNT INC
rATROLI.
CITATION
PATKENT
IPOCLSS1PC
BUSINESS
LIC. UIS1
SUN. S SATE
1
/ 1
PLAN CRICKING
P1ILD
INSPECTION
CODE
ENVOI CnRXT
RIPOSI
CONTRACTOR
LIAISON
Suite 1100
18300 Von Karman
P.O. Box 19585
Irvine. CA 92713-9585
711553-1600
FAX 714 553 0168
GrantThornton
Accountants and
Management Consultants
The U.S. Member Firm of
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS GrantThorntonlnternational
To the City Council
City of Hermosa Beach, California
We have audited the accompanying general purpose financial
statements of the City of Hermosa Beach, California as of June 30,
1989 and for the year then ended as listed in the table of
contents. These general purpose financial statements are the
responsibility of the City of Hermosa Beach, California,
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
general purpose financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
general purpose financial statements are free of material
:misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the general
purpose financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall general purpose
financial statement presentation. We believe that .our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the general purpose financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the City of Hermosa Beach, California as of June 30,
1989, and the results of its operations and changes in its cash
flows of its proprietary fund types for the year then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
owl a—a
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the
general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The
combining and individual fund and account group financial
statements and schedules listed in the table of contents are
presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not >a
required part of the general purpose financial statements of the
City of Hermosa Beach, California. Such information has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the
general purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly
presented in all material respects in relation to the general
purpose financial statements taken as a whole.
Irvine, California
November 22, 1989
-2-
January 3, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of
Hermosa Eeach City Council January 12, 1990
1988-89 MANAGEMENT LETTER (REPORT ON INTERNAL ACCOUNTING CONTROL)
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the
1988-89 Management Letter and the response from the Finance
Director and City Treasurer.
Background
In conjunction with the annual financial audit, the auditors
provide the City with a report on observations and
recommendations that the City may wish to explore.
Analysis
Segregation of Duties
- Personnel in the Finance Department are responsible for their
own EDP input and review of output. Staff believes that this
is the most efficient way of handling transactions in a small
office environment and does not present great risk to the
system. The Finance Director reviews all output for receipts
and disbursements. Verification of output for receipts is
performed independently using cash register tapes and bank
statements. Warrant registers and revenue/expenditure reports
are reviewed and distributed to the Council, Manager and all
department heads. In the past, when employees have been
terminated, access to computer applications is removed. Staff
believes these procedures mitigate the need for further
segregation.
- The Deputy City Treasurer currently does report to both the
City Treasurer and Finance Director. This has been the
practice as long as two different people have held those
positions. While this may not be the ideal, it has been
workable with existing resources. No specific weakness was
observed by the auditors because of this arrangement.
- The City Treasurer and Finance Director had discussed a change
in signature requirements for checks prior to the auditor
comment. The change has already been accomplished to require
three signatures from the following:
Mayor., City Treasurer, Deputy City Treasurer, City Clerk,
Deputy City Clerk
Agency Fund
A separate fund will be created in the accounting records to
account for assets and liabilities relating to deferred
compensation.
Property Taxes Receivable
A verbal request has been made to the County two years in a row
for information relating to a debt service property tax
receivable of $13,927.11. A written request will be made for
removal of the item if the County cannot substantiate the amount.
Gary Bru ch
City Treasurer
CONCUR:
L
Kevin B. Nortboraft
City Manager
- 2 -
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
REPORT ON INTERNAL ACCOUNTING CONTROL
AND MEMORANDUM OF ADVISORY COMMENTS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
June 30, 1989
GrantThornton
Accountants and
Management Consultants
The U.S. Member Firm of
Grant Thornton International
To the City Council
City of Hermosa Beach, California
Suite 1100
18300 Von Karman
P.O. Box 19585
Irvine, CA 927139585
714 553-1600
FAX 714 553-0168
GrantThornton
Accountants and
Management Consultants
The U.S. Member Firm of
Grant Thornton International
We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the
City of Hermosa Beach, California, for the year ended June 30,
1989, and have issued our report thereon dated November 22, 1989.
As part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of the City's
system of internal accounting control to the extent we considered
necessary to evaluate the system as required by generally accepted
auditing standards. The purpose of our study and evaluation was
to determine the nature, timing, and extent of the auditing
procedures necessary for expressing an opinion on the City's
general purpose financial statements. Our study and evaluation was
more limited than would be necessary to express an opinion on the
system of internal accounting control taken as a whole.
The management (i.e., City Council or designate) of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, is responsible for establishing and
maintaining a system of internal accounting control. In fulfilling
this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are
required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of
control procedures. The objectives of a system are to provide
management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets
are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition,
and that transactions are executed in accordance with management's
authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
Because of inherent limitations in any system of internal
accounting control, errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur
and not be detected. Also, projection of an evaluation of the
system to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the
degree of compliance with the procedures may deteriorate.
Our study and evaluation made for the limited purpose described in
the first paragraph would not necessarily disclose all material
weaknesses in the system. Accordingly, we do not express an
opinion on the system of internal accounting control of the City
of Hermosa Beach, California, taken as a whole. However, our study
and evaluation disclosed no condition that we believe to be a
material weakness. Other comments and observations which came to
our attention during our examination are set out at pages 4 and 5
of this report.
This report is intended solely for the use of management and should
not be used for any other purpose.
Irvine, California
November 22, 1989
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Other Comments and Observations
June 30, 1989
Segregation of Duties
Internal controls are designed to safeguard assets and help prevent
losses from employee dishonesty or error. A fundamental concept
in an adequate system of internal control is the segregation of
duties. We identified the following areas where the segregation
of duties could be improved.
▪ Personnel in the finance department are responsible for
their own EDP input and review of output.
The Deputy City Treasurer currently reports t- o both the
City Treasurer and the Finance Director.
The City has several personnel authorized to sign
checks. Although more than one signature is required on
all checks, these duties maybe inappropriately
segregated.
Recommendation
The City and its management should consider whether the areas
identified above are properly segregated to the necessary extent
and to the proper level of authority.
Agency Fund
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board requires that rights
and obligations related to a deferred compensation plan be
accounted for in an Agency Fund. Although the .deferred
compensation is disclosed in the financial statements as being
recorded in an Agency Fund, the City does not have a separate
agency fund established in their general ledger to account for
deferred compensation assets and liabilities.
Recommendation
We recommend that a Fiduciary type Agency Fund be established in
the City's general ledger to account for the rights and obligations
related to the City's deferred compensation plan.
Property Taxes Receivable
The City has unsecured taxes receivable relating to debt service
which have been reported by the County of Los Angeles as a
receivable to the City for the past two years. The Finance
Department believes that these receivables are being reported by
the County of Los Angeles in error.
Recommendation
We suggest that the City continue to work with the County of Los
Angeles in order to reconcile the taxes receivable in question.
If it is determined that the receivables are not due to the City,
the amount outstanding should be removed from the property taxes
receivable in the general ledger.
January 18, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 23, 1990,
1988-89 FINANCIAL REPORTS
The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report was held over from the
January 9, 1990 meeting. The auditors were present at that
meeting. Since there were no questions, the auditors will not be
present at the January 23, 1990 meeting unless a Councilmember
requests otherwise by Monday morning, January 22, 1990.
Concur:
Kevin B. Northc aft
Viki Copeland
City Manager Finance Director
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
lk
• ) -r41-04- 4 CLu (i-trt c• _ h‘.1.,u-t-ir t i'
43
l 6yvi,ot C u1P,
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
January 17, 1990
Regular Meeting of
January 23, 1990
(CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 9, 1990 MEETING)
SUBJECT: OIL PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR),
TEXT AMENDMENT, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT (CUP) AND LEASE AGREEMENT
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL
PURPOSE: SCHEDULE FOR PROCESSING ABOVE NOTED DOCUMENTS
Recommendation
Adopt attached schedule.
Background
At the November 14, 1989 meeting, the City Council approved
staff's recommended process for completion of the above noted
documents, and requested that a public workshop hearing be
included.
At the January 9, 1990 meeting, the City Council requested legal
advice regarding a public hearing workshop. Staff has revised
the wording of the schedule according to the attached City
Attorney's memorandum.
Analysis
The staff has prepared a schedule which generally follows the
recommended process. However, it was slightly modified to
coincide with the first quarter General Plan amendments. for 1990.
The schedule has been reviewed and found acceptable to the School
District and Macpherson Oil Company.
Attachments
1. Schedule
2. City Council Minutes of 11-14-89 meeting
3. Letter from City Attorney
CONCUR:
Kevin B. Northcratt
City Manager
p/ccsrsche
1
Respect gully submi.eted,
Michael chufbach
Planning Director
1j
REVISED
January 17, 1990
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE FOR CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT (E.I.R.); ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND TEXT
AMENDMENT; AND APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) AND
LEASE AGREEMENT.
Between January 17 and February 5th -- Final Draft E.I.R made
available to public for minimum 30 day review ending March 6,
1990.
March 6th -- Planning Commission to consider certification of the
E.I.R and add any necessary conditions including noting further
analysis and public review if ultimately either of the two
alternative City Yard sites are chosen. Planning Commission
holds public hearing for General Plan amendment and text
amendment.
March 15th -- City Council and School District hold joint noticed
public hearing as a workshop meeting with consultant and staff.
Due to the number of issues to be considered, it is anticipated
that no public testimony would be taken at this time. The public
hearing would then be continued to April 10th to hear public
testimony.
April 10th -- City and School District hold joint public hearing
to certify E.I.R; City Council holds public hearing on necessary
General Plan and text amendments.
Early April -- Start finalizing negotiations on final
arrangements with school district and Macpherson Oil, based on
E.I.R. information.
Late May -- Based on the final plan decisions and E.I.R.,
Planning Commission approves C.U.P.
Late June -- City Council approves lease agreement, and confirms
C.U.P. approval by Planning Commission.
p/certeir
11.
RECOMMENDATION FOR REVIEW OF PRECESSING OF OIL ENVIRON-
MENTAL IMPACE REPORT AND OTHER OIL RELATED PROPOSED
ACTIONS. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated November 7, 1989. Supplemental memo from
Michael Schubach dated November 14, 1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
Action: To approve staff recommendations as follows:
(1) To provide three (3) week public review and hold
final public hearing on only the EIR before the Planning
Commission as soon as staff can prepare reports and then
send to the City Council for a joint City Council/School
-3-
Minutes 11-14-89
District/MacPherson Oil public hearing at the next
available City Council meeting.
(2) Hold General Plan amendment and text amendments at
a public hearing before the Planning Commission and then
at the next available City Council meeting.
(3) Based on final plan and EIR, approve CUP and lease
agreement at a publicly noticed date.
And an additional item: (4) To hold an additional Public
Hearing with MacPherson Oil Company, the Hermosa Beach
School District and the City.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
Minutes 11-14-89
THOMAS W. STOEVER
WILLIAM B. BARR
CHARLES S. VOSE
CONNIE COOKE SANDIFER
ROGER W. SPRINGER
EDWARD W. LEE
HERIBERTO F. DIAZ
JAMES DUFF MURPHY
JANICE R. MIYAHIRA
LAW OFFICES
OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1000 SUNSET BOULEVARD
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
(213) 250-3043
January 16, 1990
Mr. Michael Schubach
Planning Director
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
TELECO PIER
(2131 482-5336
16 1990
Re: Oil Production EIR - Schedule for Processing
Dear Mr. Schubach:
At the January 9, 1990 meeting, the City Council continued
the above item for clarification of the proposed March 15, 1990
public hearing. In reviewing the comments of the council -
members, I recommend that the tentative schedule be revised by
restating the purpose of the March 15th hearing in the
following manner:
"March 15 - City Council and school
district hold joint noticed public hearing
as a workshop meeting with consultant and
staff. Due to the number of issues to be
considered, it is anticipated that no
public testimony would be taken at this
time. The public hearing would then be
continued to April 10th to hear public
testimony."
With this clarification, I believe that the tentative
schedule can be resubmitted to the City Council for adoption.
Should you have further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Very truly yours,
CrtzIAL_ (le
Charles S. Vose
OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE
CSV:ilf
cc: Kevin Northcraft, City Manager
January 2, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council January 9, 1990
VALLEY DRIVE SIGHT DISTANCE/BICYCLE LANE CONCERNS
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council:
For 24th Street and Valley Drive
1. Adopt Resolution No. 90- , establishing a "No Parking"
Zone (red curb) along the west side of Valley Drive from 70 feet
north of 24th Street to 70 feet south of 24th Street and on 24th
Street 70 feet west of Valley Drive.
For 24th Place and Valley Drive
2. Adopt Resolution No. 90- , establishing a "No Parking"
Zone (red curb) along the west side of Valley Drive from 25th
Street to 70 feet north of 24th Street.
For a Valley Drive Bike Lane
3. Set the matter for public hearing to consider alternatives
for a bicycle path along Valley Drive from Gould Avenue to the
Hermosa Valley School.
Background
At the November 14, 1989 meeting City Council requested staff to
bring back to the January 9, 1990 meeting background material
including previous actions and accident history for this area.
In addition, a school district boardmember's concern regarding a
bicycle lane on Valley Drive is also addressed.
NOTE: RESPONSES TO QUESTIONNAIRES ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
Analysis
Residents, as well as the City Traffic Engineer and Police
Department personnel, are concerned with the lack of adequate
sight distance at the intersections of 25th Street, 24th Street
and 24th Place and Valley Drive as early as October 1988.
During this same time period the School District was concerned
with the safety of bicycle users traveling on Valley Drive to and
from the Hermosa Valley School.
The remainder of this analysis is divided as follows:
1. Valley Drive Sight Distance (at 24th Place, 24th Street &
25th Street)
t.
2. Valley Drive Bicycle Lane
3. Summary
1. Valley Drive Sight Distance
September 13, 1988: Letter received by the City from a resident
in the 400 block of 25th Street expressing concern regarding
sight distance at the intersection of 25th Street and Valley
Drive. City Traffic Engineer performs investigation.
November 4, 1988: Residents on Valley Drive, 25th Street, 24th
Street and 24th Place receive notice that a resolution is to be
presented to City Council on November 9, 1988. The resolution is
to improve sight distances on Valley Drive at 25th Street, 24th
Street and 24th Place by painting red curb.
November 9, 1988: At the City Council meeting, the Public Works
staff recommends adoption of resolutions to improve sight
distances on Valley Drive at 25th Street, 24th Street and 24th
Place by painting red curb. After discussion, concerned about
the proposed resolutions, two residents address the City Council.
The final Council action was to direct Public Works Staff to meet
with neighbors..."safety issues to be primary concern, also that
elimination of parking being too drastic of a solution, and to
consider limitations of red zones". Staff followed through with
the meeting and reschedules the matter for December 13, 1988.
December 13, 1988: City Council adopted Resolution No. 88-5210
to improve the sight distance along Valley Drive at 25th Street
only by prohibiting curb parking.
November 11, 1989: Residents of 24th Street petition to improve
safety on Valley Drive at 24th Street.
24th Street and Valley Drive
Existing Conditions: Sight distance for emerging 24th Street
drivers is less than standard and poses a safety concern for
users on the side street as well as Valley Drive traffic. Curb
parking blocks the view of on -coming vehicles and is the key
cause of limited visibility.
In addition, 24th Street is 24 feet wide. Curb parking on both
sides makes this in effect a one way passage on a two way street.
Vehicles turning into the street and emerging have a narrow
passage way that has potential for accident.
Questionnaires: Questionnaires were sent to a total of 24
residents along 24th Street and Valley Drive to determine their
opinions on curb parking removal or to improve sight distance.
Twenty four responses, including seven (7) from residents that
were not sent questionnaires, were received.
RESULTS OF QUESTIONNAIRE (December 21, 1989)
Response From Distribution In Favor Opposed Total
Valley Drive Residents 5 1 1
24th Street Residents 19 13 1 14
Subtotal 24 13 2 15
Others 7 7
Total 24 20 2 22
Accidents: Recorded accident history for three years prior to
November 1, 1989 indicates two accidents, neither of which
involved a broadside or sideswipe collision.
Lost Parking Spaces: Curb parking removal on 24th Street and
along Valley Drive would result in a loss of ten (10) spaces,
four (4) along 24th Street and six (6) along Valley Drive.
24th Place and Valley Drive
Existing Conditions: The conditions along this street with
respect to sight distance are the same as for 24th Street. Sight
distance is less than the standard and poses a safety concern.
Questionnaires: Questionnaires were sent to a total of 38
residents along 24th Place and Valley Drive to determine their
opinions on curb parking removal to improve sight distance.
RESULTS OF QUESTIONNAIRE (December 21, 1989)
Response From Distribution In Favor Opposed Total
Valley Drive Residents 5 0 5 5
24th Place 33 7 4 11
Total 38 7 9 16
Accidents: Reported accident history at this location shows two
collisions involving single vehicles loss of control in a three
years period prior to November 1, 1989.
Lost Parking Spaces: Curb parking has been prohibited along 24th
Place adjacent to Valley Drive. Thus, only curb parking
prohibitions along Valley Drive are needed to improve the sight
distance. Because of the roadway curvature it is necessary to
prohibit parking from 25th Street to 70 feet north of 24th
Street. In this manner there will be clear unobstructed sight
lines along Valley Drive from 25th Street to 70 feet south of
24th Street. In order to implement this, fifteen (15) spaces
along Valley Drive between 25th Street and 24th Street would be
lost.
2. Valley Drive Bicycle Lane
August 1988: 185 questionnaires were distributed to area
residents along Valley Drive and its adjoining streets regarding
the public's feeling ofthe need for a bicycle lane on Valley
Drive in conjunction with curb parking prohibitions.
November 9, 1988: At the City Council meeting (as a separate
matter) Staff reports to Council regarding a School District
request (June 1988) for a Valley Drive Bicycle Lane and the
results of the August 1988 questionnaire.
RESULTS OF QUESTIONNAIRE (August, 1988)
Response From Distribution In Favor Opposed Total
Valley Drive Residents 103 4 4 8
Side Streets 82 2 11 13
Subtotal 185 6 15 21
No Addresses Listed 7 23 30
Total 185 13 38 51
October 1989: Concerns by citizens in the vicinity of 24th
Street about the difficulty of entering Valley Drive were
forwarded to the City Traffic Engineer. At the same time a study
of options for bicycle travel along Valley Drive was completed.
,November 14, 1989: Residents of 24th Street petition to improve
safety on Valley Drive at 24th Street. The Council asked the
Public Works Department to expand the study to include 24th Place
and at the same time include a study of bicycle lanes along
Valley Drive.
Nine options for bicycle routing along Valley Drive from the
Hermosa Valley School to Gould Avenue were considered. All
options assumed that neither Valley Drive nor Ardmore Avenue
would be considered for widening. Details relative to the
advantages and disadvantages of each were prepared by the City
Traffic Engineer and are listed below.
OPTION 1. ONE WAY BIKE LANE COUPLET USING VALLEY DRIVE AND
ARDMORE AVENUE.
COMMENT: This option would provide a 4 foot wide, one way
bicycle lane on the east side of Valley Drive for northbound
riders and a 4 foot wide, one way bike lane on the west side
of Ardmore Avenue for southbound riders or vice versa.
ADVANTAGES
- Bicyclists would travel with traffic in a separate lane.
DISADVANTAGES
- Bicyclists would still be close to motor vehicle traffic
- Curb parking removal would be necessary for Valley Drive
for entire length of bicycle lane.
- Bicyclists would have to cross the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt
and walk bikes up and down walkway areas.
- Location of Ardmore bike lane may be too far away from
users and would not be utilized. The northbound Valley
Drive bike lane might be used as a north and south bike
lane which is too narrow and undesirable.
OPTION 2. TWO WAY BIKE PATH ON THE HERMOSA VALLEY GREENBELT
AREA.
COMMENT: This option envisions a separate, two-way paved
bicycle path on the greenbelt area.
ADVANTAGES
- Totally separate path eliminates conflict with motor
vehicles.
- Path can be separated from joggers and other pedestrian
users.
- Curb parking on Valley Drive remains.
DISADVANTAGES
- Cost of installing or maintaining a path greater than lane
striping in other options.
- May not be compatible with proposed uses for the greenbelt
area.
- Must build ramps down to Valley Drive and Ardmore Avenue
for access to the path.
- May be unacceptable to the public to pave a portion of the
Hermosa Valley Greenbelt.
OPTION 3. ONE WAY BIKE LANE NORTHBOUND ON VALLEY DRIVE (ON THE
EAST SIDE) PLUS SOUTHBOUND BIKE PATH ON VALLEY DRIVE
SIDEWALK.
COMMENT: This option uses a portion of Valley Drive for
one-way travel and uses the sidewalk for other direction.
ADVANTAGES
- Bicycle travel on Valley Drive is in the same direction as
vehicular traffic and is in a separate bicycle lane.
DISADVANTAGES
- Sidewalk is too narrow to share with pedestrians and would
need widening. Pedestrian conflicts contribute to a
hazardous condition.
- Sidewalk bike traffic is generally unsatisfactory (Caltrans
Highway Design Manual, July 1, 1983, Section 7-1003.3)
- Sidewalks tend to be used in both directions despite
- 6 -
signing to the contrary. As such bicycles coming from the
right may go unnoticed by motorists crossing at
intersections and driveways.
- Sidewalk surface at driveway slopes is irregular.
- Shrubbery and trees at driveways may block views of
bicycles for exiting motorists.
- Motorists don't expect bikes at the crosswalk area to be
traveling at a higher speed than pedestrians.
- Bikes that travel on curb side could lose control and drop
off the curb into southbound traffic.
- Curb parking removal would be necessary for the entire
length of the Valley Drive bicycle lane.
- Bikes traveling northbound on Valley Drive would have to
cross Valley Drive through traffic to reach the bike lane.
OPTION 4. ONE WAY BIKE LANE SOUTHBOUND ON VALLEY DRIVE (ON WEST
SIDE), PLUS NORTHBOUND BIKE PATH ON SIDEWALK.
COMMENT: This option is virtually the same as OPTION 3, with
exception that the bicycle lane on the street is on the west
side of Valley Drive.
ADVANTAGES
- Bicycle travel on Valley Drive is in the same direction as
vehicular traffic and is in a separate bicycle lane.
DISADVANTAGES
- Same as OPTION 3, with the exception that bicyclists do not
have to cross Valley Drive through traffic to reach the
bicycle lane.
- Additional disadvantage is the proximity of the bicycle
traffic on Valley Drive to the bikes and pedestrians on the
sidewalk. There was a greater separation between these
users in OPTION 3. If a bicyclist drops off the curb from
the sidewalk he is now in danger of striking another
bicyclist as well as another motor vehicle.
OPTION 5. TWO WAY BIKE LANE (BOTH NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND) ALONG
THE WEST SIDE OF VALLEY DRIVE.
COMMENT: None
- None
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
- Two way bike lanes are not permitted (Caltrans Highway
Design Manual, Section 7-1003.2, July 1, 1983).
- They require one direction of bicycle traffic to operate
against motor vehicle flow, contrary to Vehicle Code
Section 21650.1 requirements.
- The closing speeds between wrong way bikes and approaching
autos reduces any available maneuver time for each user.
- Since the two way bike lane would have to be at least ten
feet wide, it could easily be mistaken for another motor
vehicle through lane. Consequences are obvious.
- Curb parking must be removed from the entire length of
Valley Drive.
- Through traffic lanes would be only 10 feet wide. This is
narrow. Larger width vehicles would encroach into the bike
lane as well as the opposite through lane.
OPTION 6. ONE WAY BIKE LANE (4 FEET WIDE) FOR NORTHBOUND &
SOUTHBOUND ON VALLEY DRIVE (REMOVE CURB PARKING).
COMMENT: This is the conventional treatment for bicycle lanes
parallel to the vehicular traffic and separated by a white
line and appropriate signing.
ADVANTAGES
- Bicyclists travel with the flow of traffic as required by
law and are separated from motor vehicles.
DISADVANTAGES
- Curb parking removal along entire length of Valley Drive is
necessary.
OPTION 7. RETAIN EXISTING CONDITION; PROVIDE GREATER BICYCLE
SAFETY EDUCATION BY SCHOOL AND CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
PERSONNEL.
COMMENT: None
ADVANTAGES
- Greater awareness by the children traveling along Valley
Drive (and the sidewalk) of hazards involved.
DISADVANTAGES
- Bikes must still compete for space with pedestrians on
sidewalk and with motor vehicle traffic on Valley Drive.
- Bikes must dodge around parked vehicles putting them in
path of through traffic.
OPTION 8. TWO WAY BIKE PATH ON SIDEWALK ALONG WEST SIDE OF
VALLEY DRIVE.
COMMENT: This option puts all of the bicyclists on the
existing sidewalk.
ADVANTAGES
- None
DISADVANTAGES
- Sidewalk is too narrow to support two way bike traffic and
pedestrians.
- Disadvantages same as OPTION 3 and 4 only worse due to two
way operation on narrow sidewalk.
OPTION 9. CONSIDER CURB PARKING PROHIBITION DURING HOURS OF 8:00
A.M. TO 4:30 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, ON THE WEST
SIDE OF VALLEY DRIVE, BUT DO NOT STRIPE BICYCLE LANES.
COMMENT: This option removes parked cars from Valley Drive
during the times when most students would be bicycling to and
from school.
ADVANTAGES
- Removes parked cars during the hours when there are the
greatest number of bicycle users.
DISADVANTAGES
- Bicyclists that use Valley Drive after the hours of
prohibition still must travel with traffic and weave in
between parked cars.
- Bicyclists wanting to travel north would be prohibited, or
would be required to travel contrary to the State Vehicle
Code.
November 14, 1989: At this meeting Councilmember Williams
requested discussion of red curb at 24th Street and Valley Drive.
Council action directed staff to bring back for the January 9,
1990 meeting background material including previous actions and
accident history for this area.
Questionnaires: During the week of December 11, 1989
questionnaires were distributed to 233 residents or affected
properties (including the School District office) regarding a
bike lane on Valley Drive. The questionnaire included only three
of the nine options and was not favorably received by residents.
RESULTS OF PRELIMINARY QUESTIONNAIRE (December 21, 1989)
Yes No No Response
Distribution 233
Responses 47
Install Bike Lane; Remove all
Parking on Valley Drive 10 28 9
Eliminate Parking on Valley
Drive during school hours 9 27 11
Leave Valley Drive "as is";
*Use Hermosa Valley Greenbelt 25 15 7
Total 45 70 27
* The questionnaire did not mention paving or not paving on the
Greenbelt. However, residents expressed strong concern not to
pave the Greenbelt.
Accidents: Reported accident history for three (3) years prior
to November 1, 1989 indicates no pedestrian or bicycle accidents.
Lost Parking Spaces: The removal of curb parking along Valley
Drive between Gould Avenue and the Hermosa Valley School results
in a loss of seventy-seven (77) parking spaces.
3. Summary
Notices have been hand -delivered to all persons responding and
not responding to the questionnaire survey (regarding 24th Street
and 24th Place) informing them of staff's recommendation to adopt
a resolution painting red curb.
24th Street and Valley Drive: Residents and drivers of 24th
Street have complained about the inadequate sight distance.
Sight distances are based on engineering judgement and the
guidelines outlined in the State Traffic Manual. The solution to
the sight distance concern is to paint red curb. Therefore,
staff recommends adoption of a resolution painting red curb for
the provision of improving sight distance.
24th Place and Valley Drive: Residents and drivers of 24th Place
have complained about the inadequate sight distance. Sight
distances are based on engineering judgement and the guidelines
outlined in the State Traffic Manual. The solution to the sight
distance concern is to paint red curb. Therefore, staff
recommends adoption of a resolution painting red curb for the
provision of improving sight distance.
Valley Drive Bicycle Lane: The option providing the safest
routing pattern together with the best operation for all users is
the bicycle path on the Hermosa Greenbelt (Option 2). The best
on -street bicycle lane configuration is Option 6, a one way four
foot bicycle lane for northbound and southbound Valley Drive on
the east and west sides of Valley respectively.
All of the other options have safety and operational
disadvantages that outweigh their implementation consideration.
On November 21, 1989 the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission
recommended no bike path along the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt area.
This recommendation was part of the Circulation Element review.
A Valley Drive bicycle lane is consistent with the implementation
policies of the Circulation Element and will not require a future
amendment to the element.
Staff recommends the setting of a public hearing to discuss
OPTION 2 and OPTION 6 as well as any other options deemed
appropriate by City Council.
Alternatives:
Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City
Council are:
1. Drop the matter.
2. Request more information.
Respectfully submitted,
//044Cr -
t t
Afl f ;� t
Anthony Antich r'
Director of Public Works
cc: Hermosa Beach School District
ccsrtraf/pworks
Concur:
evin . Northc. " a
City Manager
/ -//-)/// fir, -i/(
Michael Schubach
Director of Planning
Steve WisrfeVski
Director of Public Safety
CITY MANAGER COMMENT:
Safety and resident concerns would seem to require more red curb
at the 24th Street/Valley and 24th Place/Valley intersections due
to topography and street curvature.
The bicycle lane is a more difficult issue. Clearly, it should
not be on the Greenbelt, as a "bike freeway" on weekends would be
inconsistent with all expressed desires for passive uses.
Regarding Valley Drive bike lanes, on the positive side, it would
promote bicycling, which is positive for recreation and air
quality reasons. Also, bike paths are the second -most important
facilities cited in the recent master plan citizen survey (the
Greenbelt is No. 1). The negative is the loss of valuable park-
ing spaces, which will impact that neighborhood. Also, the loss
of parking does not result in a lane that would go through the
City or connect to other bike lanes.
1
2
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
3 CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NO PARKING RESTRICTION IN THE VICINITY
OF VALLEY DRIVE AND 24TH PLACE.
WHEREAS, residents of 24th Place have petitioned the City
5
regarding accidents in the area of Valley Drive and 24th Place.
WHEREAS, a traffic engineering study was performed.
WHEREAS, inadequate sight distance exists for vehicles
entering Valley Drive from 24th Place.
WHEREAS, there is a need to paint red curbs to improve the
sight distances.
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 II THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
13
14 Valley Drive: Eliminate parking on Valley Drive (west side)
from 25th Street to 70 feet north of 24th
15 Place.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
SECTION 1. That this amendment shall take effect immediately.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of January 1990.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
, CITY CLERK
APPROV=D A TO FORM:
25 4
26 �, i o
27
28
.r♦. •.: Jt S`V---S: i+W.e+ew..:• w..axtiLLLM�s�:M' Ivi!r.-.....ui trFY'w�ta:LYr4'..
, CITY ATTORNEY
1
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
3 CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NO PARKING RESTRICTION IN THE VICINITY
OF VALLEY DRIVE AND 24TH STREET.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WHEREAS, residents of 24th Street have petitioned the City
regarding accidents in the area of Valley Drive and 24th Street.
WHEREAS, a traffic engineering study was performed.
WHEREAS, inadequate sight distance exists for vehicles
entering Valley Drive from 24th Street.
WHEREAS, there is a need to paint red curbs to improve the
sight distances.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
24th Street: Eliminate parking on 24th Street (both
sides/north and south), 70 feet west of
Valley Drive.
Valley Drive: Eliminate parking on Valley Drive (west side)
16 Il 70 feet both north and south of 24th Street.
17 II SECTION 1. That this amendment shall take effect immediately.
18
19
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of January 1990.
20 II PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTEST:
APPROVED. AS TO FORM:
, CITY CLERK
, CITY ATTORNEY
er. - O3a
Beach
CRy Schools
t +i
1645 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
MEMBERS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT/PRINCIPAL
GOVERNING BOARD Shalee Cunningham
(213) 376-8961
FAX: (213) 376-4974
Lynne Gonzales
Greg Kelsey
Joe Mark
Susan Meyer
Mary Lou Weiss
RECEIVED
JAN 02 1990
P!IBL(C WORKS DEPT
December 1,1989
Hermosa Beach City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
ATT: Tony Antich
Dear Mr. Antich:
This letter is to inform you that the traffic on Valley Drive in
the vicinity of Valley School is of great concern to all of us. I
would like to reiterate with you what has already been written to
the City Council by school board members, community members and
our PTO.
We are emphasizing with parents the need for students to walk or
ride their bikes to school due to the congestion in our parking
lot and on Valley in the morning and afternoon during school
dismissal times. I am soliciting your help in alleviating a
dangerous and potentially hazardous situation on Valley Drive
when students are riding bikes to school.
I certainly don't have the answer but I understand some
suggestions are afoot. The best idea I have heard for an
immediate solution is a timed no -parking area on Valley between
Pier and Gould. That would alleviate the parked cars which
require students to dart into the street to avoid them. A bike
lane of course is ideal and would serve the entire community.
Please don't hesitate to call if you would like to discuss this
issue with me. It is a safety issue which greatly concerns me,
and we don't want to wait for an accident to happen before we
take action.
p-ctf, lly, •
Shalee Cunningha
Superintendent/Principal
January 17, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 23, 1989
VALLEY DRIVE SIGHT DISTANCE/BICYCLE LANE CONCERNS
This item was continued from January 9, 1990 City Council
meeting. The new information is as follows:
In reviewing the staff report and background material, it was
found that the speed limit on Valley Drive was reported as 35 mph
when in actuality it is posted 30 mph. However, the 85th
percentile speed; i.e., that speed at which 85% of the vehicles
are traveling at or below, is 38 mph. Thirty-eight mph was the
design speed used to calculate the required sight distances and
is properly reflected in the resolutions. It is necessary to
provide sufficient sight distance for drivers under actual driver
speeds and operating conditions on the street. Thus, the report
did accurately reflect the sight distance needed for 38 mph as
being appropriate despite the posted speed being 30 mph.
Respectfully submitted,
An1P •ny Antich
Director of Publ c Works
Concur:
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
January 17, 1990
City Council Meeting
January 23, 1990
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
ORDINANCE NO. 90-1022- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD
GYMNASIUM/HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE
C-2, RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL ZONE, WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,
AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING STANDARDS FOR SAID USE AND THE ADOPTION
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
"Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 90-1022, relating to the
above subject."
At the meeting of January 9, 1990, this ordinance was
introduced by the following vote:
AYES: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Respectfully submitted,
Lind. Riddle, Dep ty City Clerk
Concur:
Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager
ORDINANCE 90 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE TO ADD GYMNASIUM/HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER AS A
PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2, RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL ZONE, WITH A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING STANDARDS FOR
SAID USE AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE
DECLARATION.
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 9,
1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding a text
amendment to allow gymnasium/health and fitness center as
permitted use in the C-2 zone, and to establish parking standards
for said use and made the following findings:
A. Gymnasiums and health and fitness centers are not any more
intrusive than other uses allowed in the C-2, Restricted
Commercial Zone;
B. Because of the parking demand, the variety of the types of
gymnasiums/health and fitness centers, and its possible
impact on the character of C-2 zoned areas, a conditional use
permit to establish this type of use should be required;
C. By requiring parking at a ratio of 1 space per 50 square feet
of gross floor area used for facilities with fitness/exercise
classes, and 1 space per 100 square feet for gymnasiums with
weight lifting and weight training facilities, and requiring
the review necessary of a Conditional Use Permit will
mitigate any potential impacts associated with the parking
demand or- the intensity of a gymnasium/health and fitness
center;
D. The location of a gymnasium/health and fitness center in the
C-2 zone is appropriate for C-2 areas within the City and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
would be compatible with surrounding commercial and
residential uses;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance text be amended as
follows:
SECTION 1. Amend Section 8-3. C-2 Restricted Commercial zone by
adding to the permitted use list in alphabetical
order:
"Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Center; Conditional
Use permit required subject to Article 10"
SECTION 2. Amend Section 8-4. C-3 General Commercial zone by
eliminating the following from the permitted use
list:
"Gymnasium; Health center, physical fitness"
SECTION 3. Amend Section 1152. Off-street parking, commercial,
and business uses, by adding under (E) Commercial
uses:
"11. Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Center: 1 space
for each 50 square feet of gross floor area for
facilities offering exercise, fitness, or aerobic
dance classes, or 1 space for each 100 square feet
of gross floor area for gymnasium type weight
lifting and weight training activities"
SECTION 4. Amend ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS, by adding the
following:
"Sec. 283. Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Center.
A facility, whether open to the public or a
private club, which provides the indoor space,
equipment, and the supervision/training/teaching for
physical activities including, but not limited to,
sporting activities, exercising, martial arts,
aerobic dancing, weight training, gymnastics, and
spas."
SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full
force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of
its final passage and adoption.
SECTION 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after
the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause
this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a
weekly newspaper of general circulation published and
circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the
manner provided by law.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in
the book of original ordinances of said city, and
shall make minutes of the passage and adoption
thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City
Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 9th day of
January, 1990.
ATTEST:
APPRO/1 D AS r T.0 FO
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR
of the City of Hermosa Beach, California
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
S
r
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
January 11, 1990
City Council Meeting
January 23, 1990
ADJUSTMENT TO PARK & RECREATION IN -LIEU FEE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution, establishing a Parks and Recreation In -Lieu Fee of
$4290.00.
BACKGROUND
Section 29.5-13 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, enacted
pursuant to the authority granted by California Government Code
Section 66477, establishes the requirements for parkland
dedications and parks and recreation in -lieu fees for subdivision
projects.
ANALYSIS
The size of the vast majority of Hermosa Beach subdivision
projects (condominiums mostly) do not reasonably allow for
parkland dedication.
Section 29.5-13 allows for the payment of a fee for parks and
recreation purposes in -lieu of providing dedicated parkland. The
amount of parkland dedication or equivalent in -lieu fee is based
on a dedication ratio of five (5) acres per one thousand (1,000)
persons. Based on the last U.S. Census information, the average
number of persons per dwelling unit in Hermosa Beach is 1.97.
Based on the most recent available appraisal for open space land,
the value of open space land is ten dollars ($10.00) per square
foot
The formula for determining the in -lieu fee is therefore as
follows:
1) 5 Acres per thousand population = 217.8 square feet per
person.
2) 217.8 Square feet X 1.97 persons per dwelling X $10.00 per
square foot = $4290.66.
3) The in -lieu parks and recreation fee should be $4290.00
(rounded off for easier application) per dwelling unit
(subdivisions).
Currently the in -lieu parks and recreation fee in use is $3267.00
per dwelling unit based on a dated open space land appraisal of
$7.50 per square foot.
1
�5
Assuming the current level of condominium development continues,
the annual revenue increase will be approximately $50,000.00.
This adjustment to the in -lieu fee to reflect current land values
is consistent with the City Council stated goal of improving the
financial picture of the city.
Respectfully submitted,
William Grove, Director
Dept. of Building & Safety
Concur:
Kevin B. or orV craft
City Manager
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION 89-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE IN -LIEU PARKS AND RECREATION FEE
AT $4290 PER DWELLING PURSUANT TO SECTION 29.5-13 OF THE HERMOSA
BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, the City Council has established a procedure
pursuant to California Government Code Section 66477 to provide
for the payment of a parks and recreation fee in -lieu of
providing parkland dedication for subdivision projects; and
WHEREAS, said fee is based on the equivalent dedication of 5
acres of open space land per thousand population; and
WHEREAS, the most recent available appraisal for open space
zoned land has established the value of said land at $10.00 per
square foot.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach
does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the Parks and Recreation In -Lieu Fee,
established pursuant to the provisions of Section 29.5-13
Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be $4290.00 per dwelling
unit.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 1990.
PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY
OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
carole/fee
29.5-12 SUBDIVISION OF LAND § 29.5-13
Sec. 29. 2. Fees.
(a) Generally. - es in all cases shall be su ent to cover
the city's costs in p :. -ssing tentati . d final maps as
established by resolution_
(b) Tentative maps. ding - of two hundred and
twenty-five dolla .225.00) shall - bmitted by the
applicant t• over costs of filing and - ination of
tenta . maps. This fee shall be nonrefundable. S rd. No.
485, § 1, 4-16-74; Ord. No. N.S. 508, § 2, 8-26-7
Sec. 29.5-13. Parkland, park and recreation dedication and
fees.
(a) Authority. This section is enacted pursuant to the authority
granted by California Government Code Section 66477. The pro-
visions of this section shall not apply to any subdivisions ex-
empted from dedication requirements by California Government
Code Section 66477.
(b) Requirements. As a condition of approval of a final tract
map or parcel map for a residential subdivision, a subdivider
shall dedicate land, pay a fee in lieu thereof, or a combination of
both, at the option of the city, as determined at the time of
approval of the tentative map. Such land dedication, or in -lieu fee
or combination thereof, shall be used for parkland, park and
recreational purposes. The dedication of five (5) acres per one
thousand (1,000) persons, or an in -lieu fee or a combination thereof,
shall be imposed as condition of approval.
(c) Standards:
(1) Persons per household shall be based on the most recent
available U.S. Census.
(2) If a fee in lieu of dedication is required, the amount of such
fee shall be based on the average estimated fair market
value of land zoned for open space which would otherwise
be required to be dedicate"Fair market value" shall be
determined at the time ()Ming the final map, in accord-
ance with one of the following:
Supp. No. 9-86
342.43
§ 29.5-13 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 29.5-13
a. Fair market value shall be determined by an inde-
pendent appraisal of open space zoned property in the
city by a qualified real estate appraiser approved by
the city; appraisal shall be at the subdivider's expense
and may be accepted by the city council if found
reasonable.
b. The city may accept an appraisal of open space zoned
property when the appraisal is less than one (1) year
old.
c. The city and the subdivider may agree as to the fair
market value.
(3) Where private open space for parkland, park and recrea-
tional purposes, in excess of front setbacks and other open
space zoning requirements, is provided in a proposed sub-
division, and such space is to be privately owned and main-
tained by the future residents of the subdivision, partial
credit, not to exceed fifty (50) percent of the parkland re-
quirement, may be given for such excess open space against
the requirements of land dedication or payment of fees in
lieu thereof, if the planning commission or city council
finds that it is in the public interest to do so, subject to the
following terms and conditions:
a. The subdivider shall submit for review and approval
by the city a plan for installation of private recreation
facilities to be used in common by residents of the
subdivision.
b. The front setbacks and other open spaces required to
be maintained by the zoning ordinance shall not be
included in the private recreational facilities.
c. The use of the private recreational facilities shall be
restricted for parkland, park and recreational purposes
by recorded covenant which shall run with the land in
favor of the future owners of the property and which
cannot be defeated or eliminated without the consent
of the city or its successor.
(d) Choice of land or fees:
(1) The procedure for determining whether the subdivider is
to dedicate land, pay a fee, or both, shall be as follows:
Supp. No. 9-86 342.44
i
§ 29.5-13 SUBDIVISION OF LAND
• -•
§ 29.5-13
a. At the time of filing a tentative map for approval, the
owner of the property shall, as a part of such filing,
indicate whether he desires to dedicate property for
parkland, park and recreational purposes or whether
he desires to pay a fee in lieu thereof. If he desires to
dedicate land for such purpose, he shall designate the
area thereof on the tentative map as submitted.
b. At the time of the tentative map approval, the plan-
ning commission or city council, if appealed, shall de-
termine, as a part of their approval, whether to re-
quire a dedication of land within or adjacent to the
subdivision, payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or a
combination of both.
c. Where dedication is provided, it shall be accomplished
in accordance with the provision of the Subdivision
Map Act. Where fees are provided, they shall be depos-
ited with the city prior to approval of the final map.
(2) Determination by the planning commission or city council
as to whether to accept a land dedication or to require
payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or a combination of both,
shall be determined by consideration of the following:
a. Open space and recreational element of the city's gen-
eral plan;
b. Topography, geology, access and location of land in
the subdivision available for dedication;
c. Size and shape of the subdivision of land available for
dedication.
(3) The determination of the planning commission or city coun-
cil as to whether land shall be so dedicated, or whether a
fee shall be charged, or a combination thereof, shall be
final and conclusive; provided, however, that any land pro-
posed to be dedicated shall be approved as acceptable by
the city. In accordance with California Government Code
Section 66477(g), only the payment of fees may be required
in connection with subdivisions containing fifty (50) par-
cels or less.
(e) Limitation on use of land or fees. The land and/or fees
received by the city pursuant to this section shall be used only for
Supp. No. 9-86 °
342.45
§ 29.5-14
HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 29.5-15
the purpose of providing parkland, park and recreational facili-
ties to serve the subdivision for which received, and the location
of the land and amount of fees shall bear a reasonable relation-
ship to the requirements for and use of the parkland, park and
recreational facilities by the future residents of the subdivision.
Any fees collected under this section shall be committed within
five (5) years after the payment of such fees or the issuance of
building permits on one-half of the lots created by the subdivi-
sion, whichever occurs later. (Ord. No. N.S. 485, § 1, 4-16-74; Ord.
No. N.S. 495, § 2, 10-29-74; Ord. No. 86-836, § 1, 5-29-86)
Se 29.5-14. Sewer facilities, use fees.
(a) ' he construction of sewer facilities adequate to carr
the sew e from a proposed subdivision to the nearest tr
line shall ' e the sole responsibility of the subdivider.
(b) The ci shall not be required to accept sewage:: utflow
beyond the ca city of existing sewer lines.
(c) If in the inion of the street supe • ntendent a
proposed subdivisi.'• will exceed the capa•.' y of existing
sewer lines, the sub a ivider will be re.. red to provide
adequate facilities prio o approval of nal map.
(d) Sewer use fees m:' be rered in addition to
construction of adequate sew. line (Ord. No. N.S. 485, § 1,
4-16-74)
Sec. 29.5-15. Miscellaneo re • irements.
(a) Water service. The -.:.dividers 11 be responsible for
obtaining adequate wat ; service and s all present satisfac-
tory assurance prior t s 'approval of the fintil map.
(b) Drainage. A surface drainage shall b conducted to
an approved stdrain, gutter or absorbe on site. No
surface water -• shall flow across a sidewalk or street
intersection nless specifically approved by tie city
engineer.
(c) C• veyance of portion of subdivision. Conveyanc
any ... rt of a subdivision shall not be made by lot or blo
S : p. No. 9-86
342.46
January 16, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Regular Meeting of
Members of the City Council January 23, 1990
APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL,
USER FEE STUDY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the proposal from
David M. Griffith and Associates, Ltd. (DMG) for a user fee
study, at a cost not to exceed $27,500 and authorize the City
Manager to sign an agreement with DMG upon approval of the City
Attorney.
BACKGROUND
In April 1984, Management Services Institute presented a user fee
study to the City Council, identifying 80 service centers with
associated revenue. In July of 1984, the City Council adopted'
Ordinance 84-762 setting forth a schedule for 52 of the fees and
charges and the percentage of costs to be recovered on each. The
information has not been kept up to date due to the complexity of
the system and the manpower requirements. The additional revenue
received due to fee adjustments for the 1984-85 year was recently
estimated by staff to be over $500,000, primarily due to
adjustments in building inspection, plan checking fees and
parking fines. Revenue for subsequent years was not analyzed,
but the impact would have been fairly constant once the fees were
adjusted.
The City Council approved $30,000 for an updated user fee study
in the 1989-90 Budget. The request for proposals was approved by
City Council on November 14, 1989.
ANALYSIS
The user fee study will:
- determine the full cost of user fee related services
provided by the City
- determine the extent to which user fee related services
are subsidized
- identify amounts recoverable from enterprise and special
funds for overhead
- assist in determining the appropriateness of current fees
and service charges
- identify fees used in other cities which may be
appropriate in Hermosa Beach.
Full costs are developed by distributing central service costs
such as the administrative departments (City Manager, Finance,
Personnel, etc.) to service departments through development of a
cost allocation plan. Service department costs are then
calculated for each service area. Revenue generated by the
service and the full cost of the service are compared to
determine if subsidies exist. It is essential that the City
evaluate fees to ensure that
users are not unintentionally subsidized by tax dollars that
should be spent for the general public rather than individuals.
On the other hand, user fees must not exceed the costs reasonably
borne in providing the service, as stated in the Gann Spending
Limitation passed by the voters in 1979.
The cost allocation plan will also identify appropriate amounts
to recover for administration of enterprise funds such as the
Prop A Fund and special funds such as the Lighting Assessment
District. When the study is complete, DMG will present the
findings so that fees can be adjusted as deemed appropriate by
City Council.
Only one proposal was received, from DMG. This is not unusual
however, due to the fact that there are really only two firms
specializing in providing these services, DMG and MSI, who did
the previous study in 1984. A third company, Vertex, merged with
DMG in the spring of 1989. MSI elected not to submit a proposal.
The RFP was mailed to three firms and sent to two others upon
request. A notice was also placed in the Easy Reader. `—
DMG has extensive experience in performing user fee studies for
cities, as can be seen from the listing of clients in their
proposal. References have been contacted at several cities in
the area and all express great satisfaction with the methods used
by DMG and the results. Fees, as compared with other cities seem
reasonable, and in fact, are much lower than the fee paid in 1984
to MSI. Staff is not recommending that the second cost
allocation plan be done for grants at this time. The removal of
the second plan from the study results in a reduction in cost of
$1,500, therefore the maximum cost will be $27,500 rather than
$29,000. If participation in the CDBG program continues or
other grant programs are utilized, a plan will be considered at
that time. The cost to do the plan for grants at a later time,
however, will be higher than the cost if included in the study.
The proposal from DMG demonstrates an understanding that the City
wants a study that is truly representative of the service area
costs relating to user fees. In order to accomplish this, it is
necessary for all departments to completely comprehend the
process and be involved in development of costs. The work plan
proposed provides for education of the departments and a lot of
interaction and review that is designed to produce good results.
DMG will also suggest several alternatives for keeping the
information and user fees up to date, as requested in the RFP.
Report formats (samples are available for review in the Finance
Department) facilitate understanding and examination of the
results of the study.
Concur:
`Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
akt:4112-62-44C-1
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
s
7
a
a
a
J
a
a
1
i
1
i
1
1
1
1
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
I. Introduction/Summary 1
II. & III. Qualifications and Description of Similar
Work 3
IV. Technical Approach - Methodology 19
V. & VI. Project Costs and Report Copies/Presentation
Information 27
Appendix A - California Client List 28
Attached - Example Executive Summary
Attached - Example "Fee Book" showing detailed
calculations.,
CI
u
J'
I. INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY
OF PROPOSAL
city of hermosa beach - user fee study dmg
14 december 1989 - proposal
I
J
1
J
i
i
1
1
I. INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY
OF PROPOSAL
SUMMARY
DMG is pleased to offer this proposal for user fee and cost
allocation plan services to the City of Hermosa Beach. DMG is
very interested in providing these services to the City. These
products/services are at the heart of what DMG has built its
reputation and business on over the past 10 years. DMG has
conducted more user fee studies for California cities than any
other firm and has completed more cost allocation plans than
other firms combined. This success is accomplished only by
providing quality service that is useful to our clients. DMG
strives todeliver practical information that cities can use. We
go to great lengths to satisfy our clients - this is evidenced by
the large number of repeat clients and the successful "word of
mouth" reputation DMG enjoys.
DMG proposes to:
1) Develop two cost allocation plans.
- A full cost plan to calculate indirect costs of
user fee services and for citywide support to
enterprise funds.
An OMB A-87 cost plan to calculate indirect costs
to grant programs.
2) Conduct a user fee study
- To calculate the full cost of providing both
current and potential user fee services.
- Also to calculate the costs of any other non -user
fee activities the city may have an interest in.
3) Recommend several options to allow the updating of
these calculations to respond to the changes in
organization, costs, volumes, etc..
DMG proposes to have data available for city manager's review
within two to three months of the projects start.
DMG proposes to complete the study for a consultant fee of
$27,000 with expenses not to exceed $2,000.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study 1 dmg
14 december 1989 - proposal
v
v
J
:l
J
7
J
l
1
1
i
i
1
1
PRODUCTS/RESULTS
DMG projects results in the following deliverables:
1) Executive Summary - This document is a summary of the
project. It shows in summary form, charts, graphs, and
narratives that describe the results of the project.
This is used by upper level City Staff and City
Councils to. 1) understand the project and 2) make
informed decisions on fee increases.
2) "Fee Book" - This document contains all of DMG's
detailed calulations. With this document, accounting
staff can follow each calculation to the original basic
assumptions.
Cost Allocation Plans - The City will require two plans
- a full cost plan and an OMB A-87 plan.
DMG will provide a number of options for the annual updating of
this information. Options will range from successful methods
done in other cities to the option of purchasing/leasing DMG's
user friendly software.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study 2
14 december 1989 - proposal
dmg
a
7
1
J
1
1
1
1
1:
II. QUALIFICATIONS AND
III. DESCRIPTION OF SIMILAR WORK
city of hermosa beach - user lee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
dmg
J
J
J
J
7
-1
7
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
i
SECTION II
QUALIFICATIONS
IIA. FIRM QUALIFICATIONS
David M. Griffith and Associates, Ltd. (DMG) is the nation's
leader in the calculation of the cost of governmental
services. In our varied service offerings we have served
nearly 1500 clients nationwide. DMG opened its California
office in 1979. Since that time the firm has served nearly
200 California cities and all but one of California's
counties. We believe the principal benefits of our service
are:
• DMG is committed to work with clients to ensure
implementation of products. To this end, we provide
presentations to elected officials, management groups
and department/individuals impacted by study results.
We work to achieve one hundred percent understanding.
• DMG consultants are all individuals working in areas
within which they have intimate familiarity. We do not
subject clients to on-the-job training.
• DMG is committed to objectivity. All of our work will
stand on its own.
• DMG _strives for technical accuracy. We believe, in the
end, that our clients will be best served by the
correct solution. In view of the close scrutiny of
cost accounting applications at the present time, we
believe that short cuts with accuracy will ultimately
fail.
• DMG will guarantee its products. In areas where
products must be approved by review authorities,
governmental cost allocation plans, SB 90 cost• claims,
special analyses in audit situations, DMG is prepared
to make its' fee contingent upon ultimate approvals.
In the paragraphs below we have summarized a number of
related engagements.
A. USER FEE STUDIES
The purpose of a user fee study is to determine the
full cost of services offered by the agency for which
user fees are currently charged or could be charged.
The full cost is then compared to current revenues to
determine the amount of subsidy or the amount being
over charged. With this knowledge and the assistance
of DMG, decisions can be made concerning appropriate
fee adjustments. DMG can assist in understanding
elasticity of demand and provide information on what
others are charging; however, in the final analysis the
city of hermosa beach - user fee study 3
14 december 1989 - proposal
dmg
actual decision to increase or decrease a fee is a
local decision. DMG provides the analysis and shows
"optional" recovery levels, but the City must make the
decision to raise or lower fees.
The first step in preparing a user fee study is to
distribute central service costs to departments through
a central service cost allocation plan. When this is
accomplished the next step is to distribute the
departmental and divisional costs to each fee for
service area. This cost accounting procedure requires
detailed analysis of each service area.
Typically a user fee engagement requires about two to
three months to bring it to the point where DMG and
staff involved with the project are satisfied with the
results. Departmental and city council require
additional time that is difficult to estimate.
User fee studies have been completed (or are in
progress) for the following California entities:
City/County Year Completed
Palm Springs 1984
Cupertino 1984
Carlsbad 1985
Culver City 1985
Ridgecrest 1986 -
Port Hueneme 1986
Suisun City 1986
Livermore 1986
Sacramento County Sheriff 1986
Camarillo 1987
Yolo County 1987
Whittier 1987
Redondo Beach 1987
Fresno 1988
Menlo Park 1988
Santa Monica 1988
Nevada County 1988
San Carlos 1988
Redding 1988
Beverly Hills 1988
Tuolumne County 1988
Ventura 1988
El Segundo 1988
Torrance 1989
Brisbane 1989
San Mateo 1989
Vacaville 1989
Fontana 1989
Stanislaus County 1989
Santa Clara 1989
Santa Barbara 1989
Thousand Oaks 1989
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
4 dmg
City/County (Con't) Year Completed (Con't)
Palo Alto
Campbell
Ontario
Millbrae
Norco
Escondido
Vista
Anaheim
Solvang
Alameda
Rancho Cucamonga
1. User Fee Study Results
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
When a user fee analysis results in fee increases, the
revenue realized continues forward on an annual basis.
A specific estimate of actual increases for the City of
Hermosa Beach is difficult to provide prior to
commencing analysis and working with the City.
Estimated annual revenue increases for a number of DMG
clients is provided below:
Client
City of Carlsbad
City of Culver City
City of El Segundo
City of Fresno
City of Redding
Sacramento Co. Sheriff
City of San Mateo
City of Santa Monica
City of Santa Paula
City of Torrance
City of Vacaville
City of Whittier
Yolo County
City of Santa Barbara
2. User Fee Study References
Annual Increase
$ 590
500
900
3.5
750
500
700
350
500
1.5
400
282
590
1.3
thousand
thousand
thousand
million
thousand
thousand
thousand
thousand
thousand
million
thousand'
thousand
thousand
million
DMG is proud of its reputation for client service. One
of the best ways for a potential client to verify
proposal claims is to check a firm's references. Any of
our clients may be contacted as a reference. Listed
below are specific individuals that can comment on our
approach and results in comprehensive user fee
analyses.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study 5 dmg
14 december 1989 - proposal
USER FEE STUDY REFERENCES
City of Fontana
Mr. John O'Sullivan
City Manager
(714) 350-7666
City of Carlsbad
Mr. James F. Elliott
Finance Director
(619) 434-2867
City of Torrance
Ms. Mary Giordano
Finance Director
(213) 618-5855
City of San Mateo
Mr. John de Russy
Finance Director
(415) 377-3400
City of Anaheim
Mr. George Ferrone
Director of Finance
(714) 999-5119
City of Fresno
Mr. Ronald Anderson
Assist. City Manager
(209) 488-1342
City of Ontario
Mr. Lee Pearl
Budget Director
(714) 986-1151
City of Santa Monica
Mr. John Jalili
City Manager
(213) 458-8774
B. OTHER RELATED SERVICES
The most important qualification that is being offered is
DMG's specific experience in the analysis of user fees.
However, DMG also has extensive experience in working with
California agencies in related areas. A number of these
related areas are described in the following paragraphs.
1. Cost Allocation Plan/Indirect Cost Rate Proposal
Experience
DMG has designed a computer based cost allocation
system specifically to calculate costs for- local
governments. Our firm has been retained by about 1,000
governmental clients nationwide to develop and
negotiate central service cost allocation plans.
Our services include:
(4)
(5)
On-site data collection.
Computer processing of input data.
Negotiation of the plan's approval with State and
Federal agencies.
Monitoring of recoveries.
Training of local personnel in the plan's use to
ensure perpetuation of the plan.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study 6 dmg
14 december 1989 - proposal
(6) An annual update capability.
(7) Technical consulting in cost allocation.
(8) Development of indirect cost rate proposals.
The preparation of central service cost allocation
plans and related services, such as indirect cost rate
proposals, was the first service offered by our firm
and remains a principal line of business.
description of each of our related assignments is not
feasible due to the large number. In California we
have provided cost allocation services for over 30
cities and more than 40 counties. We have successfully
negotiated plans with all agencies having cognizance
over plan preparation. DMG city cost plan clients are
listed on Exhibit I on the following page.
2. Special Department Cost/Rate Studies
DMG routinely conducts cost of service/rate/fee studies
for city and county clients. Examples include:
• City of Burbank -- Analysis of the City's refuse
collection and disposal operation. As a result of
this analysis the City raised collection fees by
more than $700,000.
• Bay Area Rapid TransitBART
in Transit(BART) --We assisted BART
its
presentations relative to electric utility
rates before the California Public Utilities
Commission.
• Ventura County Planning and Resources Agency and
Corrections Services Agency -- We have annually
prepared a departmental cost distribution for
these agencies for the past five years. Our work
is utilized to determine user fees and charges to
governmental grants.
• Sacramento County Sheriff's Department -- DMG has
been retained on three occasions by this agency to
develop costs of service. Services include:
housing prisoners, airport security, obtaining
license permits, etc. In the area of prisoners,
our work has been approved by the U.S. Marshals
Service.
• Riverside City Library -- DMG was retained to
analyze the cost of services of this facility.
• Ventura Regional Sanitation District
G
prepared departmental cost allocations for thisi
agency involved in both liquid and solid waste.
City of hermosa beach - user fee study
7
14 december 1989 - proposal
dmg
City
DAVID M. GRIFFITH AND ASSOCIATES, LTD.
California City Cost Plan Clients
Years/Service
Anaheim
Beverly Hills
Burbank
Carlsbad
Culver City
Cupertino
Dixon
El Segundo
Fontana
Fresno
Hayward
Lancaster
Livermore
Long Beach
Menlo Park
Ontario
Palm Springs
Pasadena
Port Hueneme
Redding
Redondo Beach
Redwood City
Rialto
Ridgecrest
Riverside
Sacramento
San Fernando
San Francisco
San Jose
San Mateo
Santa Clara
Santa Monica
Santa Paula
South Gate
Stockton
Torrance
Vacaville
Ventura
Whittier
Woodland
Key:
A-87
FC
UF
SB -90
P-4
SP
DC
AB 1600
7 A-87, FC
1 FC, UF
5 A-87, FC, SB -90
3 FC, UF, SB -90
5 A-87, FC, SB -90
1 FC, OF
1 FC, AB 1600, SP
1 FC, UF, SB -90
1 A-87, FC, SP
5 A-87, FC, UF, SB -90
2 A-87, FC, SB -90,
2 A-87
3 A-87,FC, UF, SP, SB -90, P-4
6 A-87, FC, P-4, SB -90, SP
1 FC, UF, SB -90
5 A-87, FC, P-4, SB -90, SP
3 A-87, FC, SB -90
2 A-87, FC, SB -90
1 FC, SB -90, OF
2 A-87, FC, UF, SB -90
2 A-87, FC, SB -90
3 A-87, FC, SB -90
1 A-87, FC
1 A-87, FC, SB -90
6 A-87, FC, SP
5 A-87, FC, SP
4 A-87, SP, P-4
4 A-87, FC, P-4
4 A-87, FC
1 A-87, FC, SB -90
2 A-87, FC, OF
1 A-87, FC, UF, SB -90
1 FC, UF, SB -90
3 A-87, FC
5 A-87
1 A-87, FC, UF, SB -90
1 FC, UF, SB -90
2 A-87, FC
3 A-87, FC, SB -90, DC
5 FC
Services offered to Client
• OMB A-87 Cost Allocation
= Full Cost Plan
• User Fee Study
• SB 90 Claiming
= Appropriation Limitation
= Special Cost Study
• Disaster Claiming
• AB 1600 Plan
Plan
Calculation
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
8
dmg
• City of Culver City -- Analysis of the City's
refuse collection and transfer station operation.
As a result of this analysis the City raised fees
by more than $800,000.
3. Proposition 4 Appropriation Limitations (various)
Proposition 4 of 1978 requires all local entities to
prepare annually an Appropriation Limitation that
distributes all revenues between "proceeds of tax" and
"non proceeds of tax". To the extent that a user
charge exceeds the cost of a service, the excess charge
is to be included as "proceeds of tax". DMG has
assisted a long list of cities and counties in the
preparation of their Appropriation Limitations (or
review of limitations prepared internally). DMG has
also been active in the presentation of the concepts of
Proposition 4 before many groups Statewide. Some of
our clients for this service include:
Cities Counties
Livermore Calaveras
Long Beach Glenn
Los Angeles Imperial
Madera Madera
Menlo Park Merced
Moreno Valley Nevada
Newark Placer
Pacific Grove Plumas
Palo Alto San Francisco
Pomona San Mateo
Portola Siskiyou
Ridgecrest Stanislaus
San Jose Tehama
Santa Barbara Tulare
Scotts Valley Yolo
Soledad
4. State Mandated Cost Claiming (SB90)
DMG is currently the only firm serving cities and
counties in claiming State mandated costs. We are
proud to have been endorsed by both the County
Supervisors Association of California (CSAC) and the
League of California Cities for SB 90 claiming services
for their respective members. Our service to cities is
provided through the California Cities SB 90 Service.
We have served over 150 California cities in the area
of SB 90 claiming.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
9
dmg
The above project descriptions summarize typical DMG assignments.
We strongly recommend that the City of Hermosa Beach discuss our
services with clients of the firm. User fee study references
were provided in Section A. General firm references are provided
below. Each individual listed is familiar with our work as a
long-term client of the firm.
DAVID M. GRIFFITH AND ASSOCIATES, LTD.
General References
City of Long Beach
Mr. James Algie
Director of Financial Mgt.
(213) 590-6024
City of Los Angeles
Mr. Louie Lee
Assistant City Aministrator
(213) 485-5535
County of Orange
Mr. Steven Lewis
Auditor -Controller
(714) 834-2457
City of Burbank
Mr. Stephen Helvey
Assistant City Manager
(818) 953-9707
County of Los Angeles
Mr. Mark Bloodgood
Auditor -Controller
(213) 974-8301
IIB. STAFF QUALIFICATIONS
DMG will provide a team of highly skilled Consultants for
the City of Hermosa Beach's comprehensive user fee analysis.
Specific areas of expertise include:
• Governmental cost accounting
• Knowledge of governmental service delivery within each
of the departments to be analyzed.
• User fee service structure and service type in other
California city governments.
• Development of presentations for city councils and the
general public.
• Management of major projects.
Our project organization and project team members are
described below. (The estimated number of project hours
required by each is shown.)
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
10
14 december 1989 - proposal
dmg
A. PROJECT DIRECTOR - J. BRADLEY WILKES (30 hours)
The Project Director is responsible for project
staffing, project trouble shooting and technical
review. In addition, the Project Director will
participate directly in major project presentations for
City Management, City Council and other public groups.
Mr. Wilkes, a Vice President, has been with DMG for six
years. He has a B.A. from Brigham Young University and
an M.B.A. from the California State- University at
Sacramento. Mr. Wilkes manages major user fee
analyses, special fee analyses, and data processing
charge back studies for the firm. Representative
clients include the cities of: Sacramento, Burbank,
Culver City, Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, San Fernando,
Woodland, Fresno, Suisun City and Santa Clara.
B. PROJECT MANAGER - DIANE ARAKAKI (150 hours)
The Project Manager is responsible for the day-to-day
supervision of project staff. The Project Manager
participates directly in all aspects of the engagement.
Ms. Arakaki will be the projects lead person.
Ms. Arakaki is a Senior Consultant at DMG working out
of the North Hollywood office. Ms. Arakaki has been
with DMG for more than two years. She has extensive
experience in staffing Southern California user fee
analyses. City clients include: Fontana, Beverly
Hills, Santa Barbara, El Segundo, Santa Paula, Rialto,
and South Gate.
Ms. Arakaki has a B.A. from Pomona College and a M.P.A.
from the University of Southern California.
C. PROJECT STAFF (150 hours)
Project staff will be assigned to work under direction
of the Project Manager. Two project staff members will
be utilized. Each brings extensive experience in cost
accounting and user fee analysis to the engagement.
Project staff members to be assigned are:
• DONALD KOWALL
Mr. Kowall is a Consultant in our Government Cost
Accounting Group. He has been with DMG for over
two years. His areas of specialization include
computer application development, central service
cost allocation and user fee analyses. He has
served as a Consultant on user fee studies for the
cities of San Carlos, Vacaville, Menlo Park and
Beverly Hills.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
11 dmg
Mr. Kowall has a Bachelor of Science Degree in
Managerial Economics from the University of
California at Davis.
• CANDACE DUNKELBURGER OR ERIN PAYTON
Both Ms. Dunkelburger and Payton are experienced
in developing user fee and cost plan services.
Clients include: Burbank, Culver City, Ontario,
Norco, Suisun City, Campbell, Fairfield and many
others.
D. RESUMES
Resumes for each of the listed individuals is provided
at the end of this section of the proposal.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study 12
14 december 1989 - proposal
dmg
J. BRADLEY WILKES
Mr. Wilkes has been a member of David M. Griffith and
Associates, Ltd. (DMG) for over eight years. During this time he
has been involved in all phases of DMG's consulting services. He
has worked with state and county government entities in the
development of computer charge back systems, development of
mandated cost claims (SB 90), cost allocation plan development,
implementing general financial accounting systems, and has been
responsible for several user -fee and revenue enhancement studies..
Representative Engagements Include:
• Computer -Data Processing --Mr. Wilkes has been project
manager for a number of data processing related projects.
Such projects required the analysis of total cost (direct
and indirect), the development of depreciation schedules,
the creation of cost pools with corresponding cost pool rate
schedules, and the development of full cost and OMB A-87
• approved department wide usage rates.
Most recently he was responsible for a complete data center
rate analysis for the State of Utah and the State of
Arizona. The project focused on, 1) full -cost rate
development, 2) cost/benefit analysis for merging satellite
data center functions with the State Data Center, and, 3)
projecting budgets for data center customers.
• Revenue/Cost User Fee Studies --Mr. Wilkes has completed a
number of specialized accounting projects for cities and
counties. These projects include: 1) city-wide user fee
studies; 2) depreciation/amortization studies; and 3)
enterprise fund rate calculations.
• Central Service Cost Allocation Plans --Mr. Wilkes has
prepared and negotiated numerous cost allocation plans for
our California office clients. These have included plans
for both cities and counties and a sanitation district.
These projects have included "Revenue/Cost" reports to
management and the development of rates used to charge
outside users of government services. He has also assisted
as a "staff member" on several other county and city
engagements.
• Data Collection, Analysis and Computerized Data Bases --The
responsibility for the computerization of all DMG
Washington, California, Utah, Hawaii and Arizona cost
allocation plans is assumed by Mr. Wilkes. He also has
conducted the development, collection and computerization of
several data bases used by California counties statewide.
Education and other Experience:
Mr. Wilkes earned an MBA from California State University of
Sacramento. He is currently completing the final requirements
for an M.S. in Accounting. His B.S. is from Brigham Young
University in Provo, Utah. Before joining DMG, he was a staff
member of a large municipal electric company.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
13 dmg
DIANE ARAKAKI
Ms. Arakaki is a Senior Consultant in our Government Cost
Accounting Group working out of our North Hollywood office. She
received a B.A. from Pitzer College and a Master of Public
Administration from the University of Southern California.
Prior to joining DMG, Ms. Arakaki was a Senior Consultant
for the Los Angeles Government Services Group of Arthur Young and
Company. Other experience includes serving as a management
analyst and instructor at the Hawaii Institute for Management and
Analysis in Government. She has also served in a similar
capacity with the Port Authority of New York.
Relevant Experience Includes:
Cost Allocation Plans - Ms. Arakaki has prepared central
service cost allocation plans for numerous California
agencies utilizing the Griffith Cost System. City clients
include: South Gate, El Segundo, Whittier, Beverly Hills
and Fontana.
• User Fee Studies - Ms. Arakaki has served in the role of
lead consultant for comprehensive user fee analyses for the
following agencies: El Segundo, Santa Paula, San Carlos,
and Beverly Hills. She is currently completing a user fee
analysis and cost plan for the City of Fontana.
• Other Experience Includes:
Developed indirect cost rate proposals for Sacramento
County to support PC 4700 claims.
- Conducted a manpower planning and staffing study for
the Department of Parks, Recreation and Community
Services of the City of San Bernardino. This included
development of a computerized staffing model and
performance reporting system.
- Conducted a User Survey which was used to justify and
support development of an Environmental Management
Information System for Los Angeles County Department of
Data Processing. This included development of a
cost -benefit analysis.
- Assisted with an assessment study of fiscal management
training needs of local education agencies in
California. This included assessment of Generally
Accepted Fiscal Management Practices (GAFMPs) at local
education agencies and an analysis of alternative
strategies of providing GAFMPs assistance.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
14
dmg
Served as budget and legislative analyst with the
Hawaii State Legislature, House Finance and Human
Services Committees. Analyzed executive program budget
requests and related legislation; made funding and
legislation recommendations to committee members.
Ms. Arakaki is a member of several professional
organizations including the American Society for Public
Administration. Ms. Arakaki has also been active in various
community organizations.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
15 ding
DONALD KOWALL
Mr. Kowall is a consultant in our Government -Cost Accounting
Group in the Sacramento Office. He has been with David M.
Griffith and Associates, Ltd. (DMG) for two and a half years.
At DMG he has assisted with a number of projects including
cost allocation plans, user fee studies, proprietary software
development, and a worker's compensation study.
Relevant Experience Includes:
• Computer Application Development -- Mr. Kowall is thoroughly
familiar with a number of the powerful commercial software
applications utilized by DMG to support engagements. Among
others, he has developed sophisticated report presentations,
a computerized system for tracking costs in the Sacramento
County Sheriff's Department, and DMG's own in-house cost
tracking system.
• Central Service Cost Allocation -- Mr. Kowall has assisted
in the preparation of a number of central service cost
allocation plans. Clients include the cities of Stockton,
Menlo Park, and Santa Clara. County cost plan clients
include Calaveras and Snohomish County, Washington.
• Revenue/Cost User Fee Studies -- Mr. Kowall has assisted in
the preparation of user fee studies for the cities of San
Carlos, Menlo Park, Santa Clara, and currently Millbrae, and
Anaheim.
• Other -- Mr. Kowall has also participated in a comprehensive
study of worker's compensation claims for the League of
California Cities.
Education and Other Experience:
Mr. Kowall has a Bachelor of Science Degree in Managerial
Economics from the University of California, Davis. Prior to
joining DMG, he had worked for Delta Dental of California as an
in-house Consultant.
city of hermasa beach - user lee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
16 dmg
CANDACE DUNKELBERGER
Ms. Dunkelberger is a Consultant in our Government Cost
Accounting Group in the Sacramento office. Prior to working for
DMG, she worked as an Administrative Analyst for Yolo County -
County Executive's Office. She has experience with the
operations of local government agencies and is familiar with
their needs. Her primary responsibilities included budget
preparation, project cost analysis, legislation review, and
departmental support.
Representative Engagements Include:
• Central Service Cost Allocations Plans -- Ms. Dunkelberger'
has prepared and assisted in the preparation of numerous
cost allocation plans. Projects include plans for
Fairfield, South San Francisco, Culver City, and Sacramento.
• Revenue/Cost User Fee Studies -- Ms. Dunkelberger has
t, participated in the preparation of user fee studies for a
number of cities and counties. These include the City of
Norco, County of Sacramento, and Tacoma Washington.
Education and Other Experience:
Ms. Dunkelberger has a Bachelor's degree in Managerial &
Agriculture Economics from the University of California at Davis
and a Master of Business Administration from San Francisco State
University. Prior to joining DMG, she worked as a Controller for
a San Francisco law firm and, as mentioned above, as an Analyst
for the Chief Administrative Officer of Yolo County.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
17
dmg
ERIN PAYTON
Ms. Payton is a Consultant in our Government Cost Accounting
Group in the Sacramento office. She has been with David M.
Griffith and Associates, Ltd. (DMG) for four years.
At DMG she has worked with a number of cities and counties in
cost allocation plans, user fee studies, and developing Federal
and State approved jail rates for California County Sheriff's
departments. She has also been involved in the testing,
implementation, and training phases of some of our proprietary
software systems.
Representative Engagements Include:
• Central Service Cost Allocation Plans --Ms. Payton has
prepared and assisted in the preparation of cost allocation
plans for several California cities and counties. These
projects include plans for Burbank, Ontario, Sacramento, and
Culver City, Fairfield, South San Francisco, Dixon, Suisun
City, San Fernando.
• Revenue/Cost User Fee Studies --Ms. Payton has participated in
a number of user fee studies for cities and counties.
Representative clients include: Fresno, Yolo County, Santa
Paula, and Nevada County, Ontario, Norco, Campbell.
• Indirect Cost Rate Proposals --Ms. Payton assisted in the
preparation of over 60 indirect cost rate proposals for the
City of Sacramento.
• Other --Ms. Payton has done extensive testing of three of our
proprietary software systems. These systems include the
firm's long term budget system known as BASE -10, and two
separate systems for user fee studies known as FASTR,
Versions 1 and 2. She has also assisted in implementation
and training of these systems. Ms. Payton also assisted in
the development of a data base to be used in calculating PC
4700 costs for California counties.
Education and Other Experience:
Ms. Payton has a Bachelor's degree in English and
Environmental Studies from the University of California at Santa
Barbara. Prior to joining DMG she worked for Electronic Data
Systems, Inc. in their Systems Engineer Development program.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study 18
14 december 1989 - proposal
dmg
IV. TECHNICAL APPROACH - METHODOLOGY
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
dmg
SECTION IV
TECHNICAL APPROACH - METHODOLOGY
A. Detailed Work Plan
The proposed engagement consists of two phases and a number of
specific tasks. Exhibit II on the following two pages provides a
summary of the tasks which are detailed below.
PHASE I. DETAILED ANALYSIS
During Phase I DMG will conduct the service cost identification
and cost analysis necessary to support implementation. The
specific tasks involved are described in the following
paragraphs.
Task 1. Project Initiation
In our first task we will carry out those activities required to
initiate the engagement in a manner that will ensure timely and
successful project completion. Included are the following:
• Meet with the City Manager, Finance Director, and others as
appropriate to discuss the goals, objectives, and overall
scope of the engagement. Our designated Project Manager
will represent DMG in this initial meeting. It is important
that the City be represented by individuals who will be most
directly concerned with the ultimate engagement r=esults.
• Based upon this meeting, we will refine the engagement scope
as appropriate. Any significant variations will be
documented in writing and provided to the City.
• Obtain pertinent data relating to the project, including:
organization charts
budgets
prior fee/revenue analysis (if any)
municipal code
• Establish project liaison requirements
We believe the activities of Task 1 are crucial to the ultimate
success of the effort:- To this end, we will commit whatever
resources are necessary to ensure that the project gets off to a
good start.
Task 2. Establish Project Advisory Group
The revenue related services to be analyzed are carried out in
various departments and budget units. DMG intends to commit a
major consultative effort at the department level. This effort
will be directed toward fully understanding all aspects of the
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
19 dmg
1ASE I DETAILED ANALYSIS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
USER FEE WORKPLAN
Exhibit II
Task 1.
Task 2.
Task 3.
Task 4.
Task 5.
Task 6.
Project Initiation
• Meet with City Management to discuss scope
• Obtain peratinent data pertaining to project
• Establish project liaison requirements
Establish Project Advisory Group
• Determine composition and role
Prepare Full Cost Allocation Plan
• Prepare computer input sheets
• Process Plan
Develop Schedule of Current Fees and Charges
• Determine rate schedule
• Ascertain units of service provided
Develop Cost Objective Organization
• Review service delivery
• Determine departmental interrelationships
Develop Direct Service Costs
• Interview department providers
• Determine labor requirements for services
Task 7.
Task 8.
Task 9.
Task 10.
Distribute Department/Program Costs
• Distribute department administrative costs
• Distribute central service costs (from Task 3)
Match Service Cost to Service Revenue
• Determine Subsidy
Review Cost and Revenue Relationships with Departments
• Obtain agreement on costing methodology
• Make changes as appropriate
Review Cost and Revenue Relationships with Project
Advisory Group and Others in City Management
4SE /I:- IMPLEMENTATION:
• Review cost and revenue data
• Discuss consequences of fee adjustments
Task 11.
Task 12.
Task 13.
Task 14.
Develop Implementation Strategy
•
•
Determine goals
Assign roles
Prepare and provide Draft Executive Summary
Present Final Report
• Provide departmental presentation
• Provide City Council presentation
Project Close Out
• Answer remaining questions
• Discuss update methodology
21
provision of the specific services within the City of Hermosa
Beach. We believe it is extremely useful to have a
departmental liaison person within each of the major departments
to work with us during the engagement to ensure our
interpretations are correct and to assist in finding the
appropriate records to review or individuals to talk to.
Task 3. Prepare Full Cost Central Service Cost Allocation Plan
DMG will prepare a full cost cost allocation plan for the City.
A cost plan distributes central service costs, ie., City Manager,
finance, personnel to the City's various operating departments,
ie., planning, sewer, police, etc. Central service costs
represent an important component of the costs of user fee
services.
Task 4. Develop Schedule of Current and Potential Fees and
Non -Fee Areas to be costed
-In task 4 DMG will develop a schedule of current user fees
charged in the City. In addition, a listing of potential user
fees will also be developed. Our experience in working with
California cities will aid in the development of this list.
Task 5. Develop Cost Objective Organization
In the previous tasks, the DMG Consultants have concentrated on
the revenue and potential revenue producing activities carried
out by the City. In Task 5, it is necessary to step back and
review the structure of the City's organization as it relates to
actually performing the services in question. In accounting
terminology, the potential revenue service components become cost
objectives. In this task, it is necessary to determine
throughout the government structure the interrelationship of all
cost components of these services. Potential cost components
include indirect costs in the areas of: central services,
departments, programs, divisions, etc.
Task 6. Develop Direct Service Costs
For each cost objective, wherein a revenue producing service is
being performed (or a non -revenue producing service for which a
fee could be imposed), DMG will develop the direct costs of the
service. This process is accomplished within the departments
utilizing a DMG form known as the Direct Cost Distribution Sheet.
Direct costs generally include those individuals actually
performing the service and any services and supplies that can be
directly attributable to the service. To the extent possible, it
is our desire to identify as many costs as possible as direct and
treat the remaining costs as indirect. Despite this, based upon
extensive experience, we know that the vast majority of
supervisorial and service and supply costs will have to be
treated as indirect costs. In any event, a hallmark of the DMG
approach is to present all costs fully substantiated.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
22 dmg
Task 7. Distribute Department/Program Overhead Costs
In Task 7, the final layer of indirect costs will be distributed
to each service area (cost objective). In general, this level
reflects the supervision occurring at the department/division/
program level and their associated services and supplies. DMG's
approach to this distribution depends on the complexity of the
governmental unit being analyzed. The overall distribution of
costs is accomplished using DMG's FASTR System.- This system is
the most comprehensive tool available to analyze governmental
service costs. Exhibit III, following this page, illustrates the
DMG approach to fee analysis by highlighting both direct and
indirect costs.
Task 8. Match Service Revenue With Service Costs
In this task,, the total cost of each service is matched with the
•total revenue resulting from each service. In its basic form,
the resulting table illustrates the total tax subsidy associated
with each service. The table provides a departure point for use
in fee discussions and the development of consultant
recommendations.
Task•9. Review Cost and Revenue Relationships with Departments
The cost relationships developed by DMG are based upon
information supplied by the City's departments. In Task 9, we
return to each department to review the preliminary results. We
believe this to be an extremely important step as it is the
departments that must ultimately be comfortable with the costing
methodology.
Based upon the departmental reviews, changes will be made as
appropriate.
Task 10. Review Cost and Revenue Relationship with the Project
Advisory Group and Others in City Management
In a simplistic approach, the City could raise its user fees so
as to eliminate the subsidy depicted in the subsidy table. There
are a number of problems associated with doing this that must be
taken into consideration. Among others, there are the following:
• It may not be politically feasible to raise a particular
fee.
• It may not be legal to raise a particular fee.
• An undesirable social consequence may result from raising a
particular fee (ie., a group may be excluded from a desired
service).
• An undesirable economic consequence may result (ie., an
increase in fee may result in less revenue due to elasticity
of demand).
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
23 dmg
Exhibit III
DMG APPROACH TO FEE ANALYSIS
PLAN REVIEW
1. FULL COST OF PROVIDING SERVICE:
r'
o Direct Labor: Total Per Unit
Senior Building Code Technician $ 1,982 $ 4.01
Senior Building Inspector 29,502 59.72
Building Inspectors 76,562 154.98
General Administrative 26,265 53.17
$134,311 $271.88
o Other Direct Costs
o Departmental Overhead
o County Overhead
o Incoming Costs
$ 19,034
7,493
28,869
3,458
$38.53
15.17
58.44
7.00.
TOTAL FULL COSTS: $193,165 $391.02
2. UNITS OF SERVICE: 494 1
3. CURRENT REVENUE: $ 14,935 $ 30.23
4. GENERAL FUND SUBSIDY: $178,230 $360.79
5. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL REVENUE: $178,230 $360.79
24
dmg
In Task 10 the possible consequences of each potential action
will be discussed with the Project Advisory Group and other
management individuals. Based upon these discussions and our
knowledge, recommendations will be formulated.
PHASE II. IMPLEMENTATION
In Phase II of the engagement, DMG will work with the City in the
development of an implementation program. Tasks required to
implement this program and close out the engagement are described
below.
Task 11. Develop Implementation Strategy - Present Full Cost
Calculations
A hallmark of the DMG approach to all of our engagements is to
facilitate making something happen. In terms of a user fee
analysis, this generally means fee increases that result in
additional general fund revenues.
Task 12. Prepare and Provide Draft Executive Summary
Our standard procedure is to provide our project report t� our
clients in draft form prior to final distribution. This
procedure offers an opportunity to discuss individual
recommendations in detail prior to report finalization. Based
upon these discussions, the draft report will be modified as
required and submitted in final form. The report will
specifically discuss the City's relationship to other California
cities. With our city and county fee data base, we have a
unique resource that allows us to make the comparisons desired.
Task 13. Present Final Report
The nature of the proposed engagement is controversial. The
subject of fees for service raises many important considerations
within the governmental bureaucracy, at the political level, and
with the public.
We believe it is extremely important that all parties fully
understand the basis for and rationale behind the project
findings and recommendations. To this end, DMG is committed to
working to ensure the requisite level of understanding. This
typically requires:
• A presentation to management with less emphasis on detailed
methodology, but greater emphasis on the impact of
recommendations and implementation strategies.
• Engagement presentation to the City Council to provide an
overview of the project and its findings. Any questions
concerning the project will be answered at this time. For
costing purposes we have assumed that two presentations will
be required.
city of hermosa beach - user lee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
25 ding
Task 14. Project Close Out
In the final task we perform those activities necessary to ensure
successful project completion. Included are:
• Remaining questions are answered
• Methodology and proposed update requirements are discussed.
Software for the FASTR System (for user fees) will be
provided to the City, if desired.
The above tasks summarize what we believe to be the necessary
activities to accomplish the work discussed. We wish to
underscore the fact that we attempt to remain flexible in all of
our engagements. Consequently, if this work plan does not
specifically meet your needs, please advise us so that we may
revise our approach as required.
B. Major Project Milestones
The principal milestones of the engagement are as follows:
• Full Cost Cost Allocation Plan - The full cost plan is
included in draft form. Upon review it is finalized.
• Draft User Fee Report - DMG reviews draft findings with
the departments on a department by department basis.
When these have been completed an overall draft report
is provided. Upon review the draft report is finalized.
• Presentation to the City Council - The final step in
the process is the presentation of results to the City
Council.
C. City Support Requirements
Two types of support are required.
• Liaison Person - DMG requests that the City assign a
liaison person for the duration of the engagement.
This individual is not required to provide direct
project support rather he/she assist in scheduling,
locating materials, etc.
• Departmental Support - DMG staff will meet with each of
the departments in which fees are analyzed.
Departmental personnel will be asked to describe tasks
and provide time estimates or other data currently
available. Departmental personnel will also be asked
to review results.
Based upon completing 40 efforts such as this, it is
our experience that departmental personnel readily
participate and do not find this role burdensome.
1 city of hermosa beach - user lee study ding
it 14 december 1989 - proposal 26
V. PROJECT COSTS AND
VI. REPORT COPIES/PRESENTATION INFORMATION
city of hemmosa beach - user fee study dmg
14 december 1989 - proposal
`J
1
SECTION V
PROJECT COSTS
A. CONSULTANT FEE AND EXPENSES
DMG proposes to complete the engagement for a consultant fee
of $27,000. This fee amount is based on our experience in
conducting these types of studies in other Southern
California cities of similar size and upon our estimate of
hours required to complete the study.
Project expenses such as air fare, rental car, hotel, meals,
etc., are estimated at $2,000.
DMG proposes to complete the study for a fee which will not
exceed $29,000.
B. COPIES AND PRESENTATIONS
DMG will supply numerous draft and review copies of reports.
Typically, 10 bound copies of the final report are provided.
DMG proposes to attend two final presentations to council,
staff or other interested parties.
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
27
dmg
APPENDIX A
LIST OF DMG'S
CALIFORNIA CLIENTS
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
dmg
DAVID M. GRIFFITH AND ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Listing of California City Clients
Aguora Hills Gonzales
Albany Grover City
Alhambra Half Moon Bay
Anaheim Hayward
Antioch Headlsburg
Arcadia Hollister
Arroyo Grande Holtville
Arvin Hughson
Atascadero Huntington Beach
Auburn Huntington Park
Avalon Huron
Azusa Imperial Beach
Bakersfield Industry
Baldwin Park Indio
Belmont Inglewood
Bell Gardens Kerman
Belvedere Kingsburg
Benecia La Habra
Berkeley Lancaster
Beverly Hills Laguna Beach
Brea La Palma
Brisbane Larkspur
Burbank Lindsay
Burlingame Live Oak
Calexico Livermore
Camarillo Loma Linda
Carlsbad Long Beach
Carmel -By the Sea Los Angeles
Chowchilla Los Gatos
Coalinga Madera
Compton Martinez
Coronado Menlo Park
Corte Madera Monterey Park
Costa Mesa Milbrae
Culver City Monrovia
Cupertino Morgan. Hill
Danville Mountain View
Delano Newark
Dixon Nevada City
Dorris Novato
Duarte Oakland
El Centro .. Oceanside
El Segundo Ontario
Eureka Orland
Exeter Oxnard
Fairfax Pacific Grove
Fairfield Palm Desert
Fontana Palm Springs
Fresno Palo Alto
Gardena Pasadena
Gilroy Pasa Robles
Glendora
city of heimosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
28 dmg
t
1
1'
d
DAVID M. GRIFFITH AND ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Listing of California City Clients (Cont.)
Patterson
Perris
Petaluma
Placentia
Placerville
Plymouth
Pomona
Port Hueneme
Portola
Poway
Redding
Redlands
Redondo Beach
Redwood City
Rialto
Richmond
Ridgecrest
Ripon
Riverside
Ross
Sacramento
San Anselmo
San Bruno
San Carlos
San Clemente
San Fernando
San Francisco
San Juan Bautista
San Jose
San Luis Obispo
San Mateo
Sanger
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Santa Cruz
Santa Monica
Santa Paula
Santa Rosa
Santee
Scotts Valley
Seal Beach
Shafter
Soledad
South Gate
South Pasadena
South San Francisco
Stockton
Suisun City
Sunnyvale
Taft
Thousand Oaks
Tiburon
Torrance
Tracy
Tustin
Vacaville
Ventura
Vernon
Vista
Whittier
Woodland
Yorba Linda
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
29 dmg
DAVID M. GRIFFITH AND ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Listing of California County Clients
Alameda Orange
Alpine Placer
Amador Plumas .
Butte Riverside
Calaveras Sacramento
Colusa San Benito
Contra Costa San Bernardino
Del Norte San Diego
El Dorado San Francisco
Fresno San Joaquin
Glenn San Luis Obispo
Humboldt San Mateo
Imperial Santa Barbara
Inyo Santa Clara
Kern Santa Cruz
Kings Shasta
Lake Sierra
Lassen Siskiyou
Los Angeles Solano
Madera Sonoma
Marin Stanislaus
Mariposa Tehama
Mendocino Trinity
Merced Tulare
Modoc Tuolumne
Mono Ventura
Monterey Yolo
Napa Yuba
Nevada
city of hermosa beach - user fee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
30 dm9
DAVID M. GRIFFITH AND ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Listing of California Association Clients
Aptos/La Selva Fire Protection District
Association of California Water Agencies Joint Powers
Insurance Authority
Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Big Bear City Community Service District
Calaveras County - 23 Special Districts
California Community College And Junior College Association
Cameron Park Community Services District
Carmel Valley Fire Protection District
Central Contra Costa County Sanitary District
County Supervisors Association of California
El Dorado Irrigation District
Elk Grove School District
Evergreen School District
Fresno Housing Authority
Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District
Housing Authority of Los Angeles
Humboldt No 1. Fire Protection District
Kaweah Delta Hospital District
Kentfield Fire Protection District
Lakeside Fire Protection District
Lindsay Local Hospital District
Los Angeles County Community Development Commission
Marin Cities Workers' Compensation JPA
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
Mid Valley Fire Protection District
North Central Fire Protection District
Oakland Housing. Authority
Omnitrans
Petaluma Valley Hospital
PRECOM Joint Powers Authority
Riverside Medical Laboratory
Rubidoux Fire Protection District
Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency
Sacramento Sheriff's Department
San Bernardino School District
San Francisco Housing Authority
San Juan Unified School District
San Miguel Fire Protection District
Schools Committee for Reducing Utility Bills
Selma Hospital District
Sierra Ski Areas Association
South Coast Water District
Southern California Rapid Transit District
Spring Valley Fire Protection District
Sunline Transit Agency
Terrance E. Lowell and Associates
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Ventura Regional County Sanitation District
Western. Contra Costa Transit District
Western Mobilehome Association
Westside Fire Protection District
city of hermosa beach - user tee study
14 december 1989 - proposal
31 dmg
•
January 17, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Each City Council January 23, 1990
PUBLIC WORKS YARD RELOCATION,
CIP 91-608
Recommendation:
1. Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement for feasibility
study services with Harris & Associates at a cost of
$9,500 ($8,500 plus contingency).
2. Appropriate $9,500 from the General Fund Designation for
Capital Improvements to CIP 91-608.
Background:
In 1984, the electorate of the City of Hermosa Beach voted to use
the existing City Yard as an oil drilling site. Due to the small
size of the site and the possibility of additional wells and
production facilities on the site, the oil drilling use and the
City Yard use are not compatible on the property. Thus, the City
yard functions need to relocate. Also, irrespective of the oil
issues, the yard facilities are inadequate at this time. In the
future the present yard will continue to be inadequate for the
City's needs and will require major renovation.
At the City Council meeting of October 24, 1989, the City Council
reviewed six sites for the EIR on oil drilling at the City Yard.
The Council voted to further study three of the sites. Those
sites are:
1. The South School site
2. The Southwest half of the Community Center site
3. The Self Storage site south of City Hall
Analysis:
Two engineering firms have submitted proposals to the City for
providing the feasibility study at the three sites. Both
proposals are available for review in the City Clerk's Office.
The purpose of this feasibility study is to provide adequate
information for the City Council to make a decision as to which
of the three sites the City should pursue for the final site.
a. Wildan Associates submitted their proposal for $8,700.
b. Harris & Associates submitted their proposal for $ 8,500.
Both engineering firms would provide the needed feasibility study
and site plan information including preliminary cost estimates.
- 1 -
7
Funding Source:
General Fund Designation for Capital Improvement
Balance December 31, 1989 $367,971
This Project 9,500
Revised $358,471
Alternatives:
Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council
are:
1. Award the project to the other engineering firm.
2. Decide on which site to use without any feasibility study.
3. Use the new engineering staff member after he comes to work
for the City to provide the information.,
Respectfully Submitted:
Con
ynn A. Terry, P.E(/ An "ony Antich
Deputy City Engineer
Noted For Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Director of Finance
Director of Pub is Works
evin B. Nort - raft
City Manager
City Managers Comment:
1. The quick action requested regarding this effort is necessary
to comply with the oil Environmental Impact Report processing
schedule, which sets early April as the target to finalize
negotiations with MacPherson Oil. The negotiations obviously
will involve at least partial relocation of Yard operations.
2. Owners of the two properties to be studied, that are not
owned by the City, have been informed of this recommendation.
3. MacPherson Oil has been requested to consider advance funds
for this study. A response is anticipated prior to the Council
meeting.
4. If approved, the work is to be performed within 30 calendar
days of the notice to proceed.
cc: Hermosa Beach City School District
Owner, Self Storage Building
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
HARRIS
& ASSOCIATES
CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
January 17, 1990
Mr. Lynn Terry
Deputy City Engineer
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Dear Mr. Terry:
Re: R.F.P. for Preliminary Site Investigation Study for Relocation
of the City's Corporation Yard
Harris & Associates Is pleased to submit this proposal to conduct a preliminary site investigation
study for relocation of the City's Corporation Yard. We understand that three (3) sites are under
consideration.
ABOUT OUR FIRM
Harris & Associates is a multi -disciplined consulting firm offering civil engineering, architecture and
construction management services exclusively to cities, counties and other public agencies. Over
the years we have been involved with agency maintenance facilities as designers and construction
managers. In addition, most of our project managers have served as public works directors and
have had responsibilities for planning, design and operation of corporation yards.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Harris & Associates proposes to conduct the preliminary site Investigation generally as follows:
1. Determine corporate yard facility needs by visiting the existing facility, discussions with
key public works administration and operations staff regarding existing and planned
programs, and expansions, unmet needs at the existing facility, etc.
2. Develop In broad terms the facilities required at the new corporation yard and review with
staff.
3. Visit the three (3) candidate sites and using City provided aerial photos as base maps,
prepare preliminary plans and layouts of the required facilities at each location.
4. Develop preliminary cost data for site development, buildings and major equipment at each
location.
5. Review operational and construction issues at each site, and list the advantages and
disadvantages that exist.
4281 KATELLA AVENUE, SUITE 100 • IAS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA 90720
(714) 229-0900 ■ (213) 402.2600 ■ FAX (714) 229-0995
Mr. Lynn Terry
City of Hermosa Beach
Page 2
January 17, 1990
SCOPE OF SERVICES (Can't)
6. Review findings with staff.
7. Prepare 15 copies of a report containing the preliminary layouts and other findings of the
study.
8. Present the report at a City Council meeting.
PROJECT STAFF
The Project Manager will be Edgar E. Edwards, P.E. Mr. Edwards has been the Public Works
Director of three California cities and is thoroughly familiar with the operations and needs of a
Corporate yard facility.
Mr. Edwards will have our Staff Architect, R. Bruce Ballentine, A.I.A. available for building layout and
site development. Mr. Ballentine has been the designer of maintenance facilities for four public
agencies In his 14 year career with Harris & Associates.
Eugene Lau, P.E. will lead our cost estimating staff in preparing the preliminary estimates for the
study.
FEE
We propose to complete the work outlined in this proposal at our normal hourly rates, at a cost not
to exceed $8,500. This cost figure reflects a level of effort' type study where the detail and depth
at which the Investigation takes place is controlled by the budget.
Typical hourly rates are as follows:
Project Manager $95.00
Project Engineer $80.00 to $90.00
Architect $83.00
Staff Engineer $60.00 to $75.00
Clerical $45.00
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal to the City, and If selected will complete the
work In a timely and professional manner.
Very truly yours,
Harris &-, .5sociates
Robe J. Mimlaga, P.E./
Vice President
RJM:ds l
(1P378)
• HARRIS & ASSOCIATES ■
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
January 18, 1990
Mr. Lynn Terry
Deputy City Engineer
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
HARRIS
Sc ASSOCIATES
CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
RECEIVED
JAN 18 1990
PURI WORKS DEPT.
Dear Mr, Terry:
Re: R.F.P. for Preliminary Site Investigation Study for Relocation
of the City's Corporation Yard
In reference to our proposal dated January 17, 1990, Harris & Associates will complete Items 1
through 7 within 30 calendar days from receipt of the notice to proceed.
Very truly yours,
Harris & Associates
Edgar E. Edwards,
Project Manager
EEE:nmd
(1P387)
4281 KATELLA AVENUE, SUITE 100 • LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA 90720
(714) 229.0900 (213) 402-2600 ■ FAX (714) 229-0995
January 16, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 23, 1990
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
ANNUAL REPORT OF ACTIVITIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1989
This is the City's second attempt at an annual review of activi-
ties, accomplishments, and trends. Such a "look back" is not
automatically done in busy organizations, as the orientation is
almost always towards what needs to be done in the future. Such
reviews are, however, valuable to an organization to recognize
that, despite the many things remaining on the agenda of things
to do, progress is being made and jobs are being completed.
The report is not intended to be overly statistical, as the
monthly reports provided the Council reflect statistics on the
routine activities of each department. This is not to imply that
the day-to-day activities of the department are insignificant, as
they represent a large majority of the efforts put forth by your
City staff.
Progress on City Goals
Note: Goals are listed in priority order -
1. Improve financial picture -
a) The estimated General Fund balance for 1989-90 fiscal
year increased by 20% over the prior year, and the un-
designated portion of this "savings account" increased
255%, from $395,000 to $1,007,000.
b) Budget as presented to the City Council was balanced as
directed by the City Council.
c) Efforts to increase revenue and reduce costs from 1988,
which resulted in more than $700,000, continued for
those items that are capable of being made perennial
impacts. It is anticipated that over $600,000 of that
impact will be repeated in the current fiscal year.
d) Implemented sales tax auditing to ensure all legal
revenue from sales tax is being received by the City.
e) Implemented the word processing secretary to serve all
departments in lieu of numerous requests for increased
staff for individual departments.
f) Sold three surplus City lots within the City, netting
over $1,000,000 in revenue.
1
g)
Approved and prepared request for proposal for cost al-
location plan to update the City's fees, many of which
were last updated in 1984.
h) Reviewed many grant possibilities and applied for
several related to parks and traffic.
i) Continued tight review of the budget requests and pur-
chasing, and recommended funding of personnel only when
the revenue from the personnel exceeded costs.
2. Develop the Biltmore Site -
a) A major effort was undertaken during the year to work
with the Council appointed task force in an effort to
develop a broad based solution to the question of what
to do with the Biltmore site. While the task force
recommendation as amended by Council did not -receive a
majority vote in the November, 1989 election, its work
did clarify the options and narrow the focus on the
Biltmore site. It appears at this point that the com-
mercial options have been exhausted, as well as options
that require a majority vote of the people.
b) The originally proposed Biltmore project including the
City's own Biltmore site and private parcels was formal-
ly dismantled by the rezoning of the private parcels.
3. Growth Management -
a) The consistency hearings to conform the General Plan
designations and the zonings were completed, as were the
merging of lots pursuant to Council direction.
b) Numerous moratorium ordinances were prepared and ap-
proved while thorough studies of impacts could be deter-
mined. These included moratoriums on Zoning/General
Plan inconsistencies, multi -use corridor, nonconforming
uses and buildings, building heights in zones adjacent
to R-1 zones, and density limitations in the R-2, R -2B,
and R-3 zones.
c)
A major effort for the year was to study the multi -use
corridor, to determine the best zones for the lands
within the corridor, and clarify their use so that
owners would know what options were available for their
properties. The study was completed as well as major
General Plan changes to comply with the results of the
study.
d) The circulation element, being developed by a consul-
tant, was prepared following extensive staff input and
corrections, and submitted to the Planning Commission
and City Council for public comment and approval.
2
e) Existing bootleg enforcement continued. Due to dif-
ficulties in achieving enforcement through the District
Attorney's office when voluntary compliance was not ob-
tained, a new special counsel for enforcement of code
violations was recruited and hired.
f) The nonconforming ordinance was studied, prepared and
approved to clarify the uses permitted for the City's
many nonconforming uses and structures. -
4. Organization effectiveness -
a) A study by City employees of General Services and the
code enforcement functions was accomplished by a task
fobce, and numerous changes were approved. These chang-
es are designed to increase the City's effectiveness and
efficiency in these areas.
b) A city-wide records management project was recommended
and approved.
c) Computerization of Council actions and employee accruals
was purchased and implementation begun.
d) A new City Attorney was hired with reduced office hours
and retainer.
e) The City office procedures regarding reclassification,
Council follow up, and activity reports were amended.
f) Information on public agency customer service training
was compiled for a 1990 program.
g) Sales of surplus property was accomplished for the first
time by a contract that increased the City's revenue
while substantially reducing City costs for sale of
these items.
h) Emergency preparedness was organized formally by special
assignment of two individuals in the Public Safety
Department, and the City's first simulation of a disas-
ter in many years was conducted for training purposes.
i) Mini -seminars for City staff were initiated to educate
and train City employees in areas such as: preventing
back injuries; retirement planning (PERS issues and de-
ferred compensation); and stress reduction. These semi-
nars were provided at no cost to the City.
Management and supervisor training was continued at a
low cost through the City's participation in a multi -
agency training consortium (South Bay Employment Rela-
tions Consortium).
j) Risk management activities of the City's Risk Management
Officer was expanded to increase the City's monitoring
of exposures and costs of claims.
k) Part of the recruitment process in Personnel was brought
in-house to improve speed, effectiveness, and reduce
costs in contracting for such services with the County.
1) The City's Building, Plumbing, Electrical and Mechanical
codes were updated by the adoption of the 1988 Editions
of the Uniform Codes.
m) A long term plan for parks and recreation was developed
via a study by a consultant and a Master Plan that was
approved by the Recreation, Parks and Community Resour-
ces Commission.
n) A special event policy was amended and approved to pro-
vide better controls on the many special activities that
go on in our community each year.
o) New Council orientation was conducted for three new
councilmembers to aid in their orientation to their new
roles. Review and updating of goals was begun as part
of the change in Council seats.
p) Studied reorganization of code enforcement and General
Services in an attempt to improve effectiveness while
reducing costs.
q)
A thorough review of the City's cable franchise was ac-
complished, resulting in significant improvements to
signal quality and better access to local programming.
r) Developed formulas for distribution of insurance costs
to each department for the first time to present a clear
picture of department costs and assist in cost
containment.
5. Enforcement of Laws -
a) Major efforts to increase enforcement were conducted
during the year. These efforts emphasize the following
enforcement areas - conditional use permits, alcoholic
beverage control licenses, skateboarding, bicycling, and
window wall, post and utility pole signage.
b) Skateboarding at the pier head was eliminated, and an
ordinance was passed to enable enforcement of no
skateboarding on private lands.
c) Enforcement of dog excrement and dogs off -leash con-
tinue, with implementation of enforcement on the Green-
belt as a result of the November, 1989 election
initiated.
4
d) A new productivity system for police officers was ini-
tiated, resulting in the following increases in cita-
tions from the prior year:
Activity 1988 1989 Inc. %+
Criminal Citations 885 1515 630 71%
Bike/Skateboard Citations 3 233 230 7,666%
Traffic Citations 3921 4933 1012 26%
e) New ordinances were adopted for calls to parties and
noise designed to give the staff better tools to abate
negative impacts on the quality of life in Hermosa
Beach.
6. Comprehensive review of General Plan -
a) Circulation Element was drafted, revised extensively by
staff via comments and corrections, and presented to the
Planning Commission and City Council.
b) The Housing Element revisions were begun and are being
drafted by staff.
c) Master Plan for Parks and Recreation was developed by a
consultant and reviewed by the Recreation, Park and Com-
munity Resources Commission. It should eventually be-
come a part of the Open Space Element of the General
Plan.
7. City Departments Procedures -
a) Several new administrative regulations and handouts are
available in the Building and Planning Departments.
8. Add Open Space -
a) Perhaps the City's largest purchase of land was complet-
ed, with the purchase of 80% of the railroad right-of-
way, now named the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt. The pur-
chase was accomplished by a $5.0 million Certificate of
Purchase issuance with a consortium of other cities to
reduce the funding costs, following an extensive review
of financing options. The purchase also required an
elaborate review of the land's title, its easements and
licenses, in order to assure that we knew exactly what
was being purchased.
b) The right-of-way was zoned by the people in November,
1989 to assure its passive open space status.
c) Negotiations continued with the School District for pur-
chase of South School and Prospect Heights. Funds to
acquire this land have been designated and/or targeted
on a tentative basis.
5
d) Efforts to complete the oil drilling, with all eligible
revenue to go towards purchase of open space, continued
with several public hearings on the environmental impact
report before the Planning Commission. Staff continues
to work with the School Board, Macpherson Oil, and an
EIR consultant to provide information on such things as
City Yard relocation necessary to further this project.
9. Complete inconsistencies and lot mergers -
a) All lot mergers finalized, and three of the four phases
for obtaining our permit authority from the Coastal Com-
mission have been completed.
10. Improved relationships with the School District -
a) Staff arranged with the District to maintain its portion
of Valley Park in exchange for its use, and that ar-
rangement is now operational.
b) Regular discussions are continuing with the Superinten-
dent, staff monitors their agendas and provide Council
agendas to the District, with items related to the Dis-
trict provided in detail.
c) A joint meeting was conducted with the School District
during the year.
11. Promote commercial developments -
a) Two hotels are being processed, and an additional hotel
has been discussed.
b) Staff is working with several interests along Pacific
Coast Highway that are discussing development proposals.
c) The Pavilion has been slow to develop, but staff is
maintaining contact with the owners to provide whatever
assistance we may to further their leasing up while not
creating problems to the neighbors.
d) A plan for a car leasing agency to relocate on Pacific
Coast Highway from an inappropriate location was worked
out and accomplished.
12. Traffic concerns -
a) As noted above, the Circulation Element was drafted and
before the Council in December, 1989.
b) In January, 1989, the City formally received the State
Office of Traffic Safety's review of the City's Traffic
Engineering efforts. Both Public Works and Public Safe-
ty Departments have been implementing their recommenda-
tions since that date.
6
c) 1989 was an active year for utilization of the City's
contract traffic engineer. At least 14 specific studies
of various locations were accomplished during the year,
most of which were in response to citizen inquiries for
improved safety and traffic circulation.
13. Public policy process -
a) Display ads and noticing well beyond the minimum re-
quirements continued.
b) Citizen meetings were conducted during the year involv-
ing the Biltmore site, Vasek Polak dealership com-
plaints, and master planning of our recreation and park
facilities.
c) The Biltmore Task Force and special Council meetings
were televised, live when possible.
14. Park and Recreation Program -
a) There was a large expansion of the summer holiday and
classroom programming.
b) Recreation brochures were developed for the first time
and are now being distributed three times per year to
reflect and explain the expanded programming.
c) City hosted eight large scale special events in the sum-
mer of 1989 including professional volleyball tourneys
and the International Surf Festival.
15. Commercial/residential conflicts -
a) The multi -use corridor study was a major effort in 1989
and is in the process of being implemented. Part of
this effort is to provide buffers between commercial and
residential areas where possible.
b) Both C.U.P. enforcement effort and implementation of
commercial specific plan areas are designed to reduce if
not eliminate the conflicts that commercial enterprises
represent to our residents.
c) Expansion of C.U.P. enforcement now involves weekly
checks by the Police Department in coordination with the
Planning Department, and other departments as necessary,
to insure that conditions are being consistently and
continuously met by conditional use permittees.
16. Improve City Image -
a) The City's enforcement of illegal signs, especially
utility pole signs, is a factor in improving the City's
visual image.
b) New bus benches were approved by the City Council, and
all advertising benches were formally prohibited.
c) Rehabilitation of all substandard City sidewalks were
approved in concept during the year.
d) The appearance of City Hall was improved by a variety of
methods, including better signage, better landscaping
and plantings, painting of the facility, and improved
parking areas for citizens.
e) City Council has approved upgraded and more attractive
entry signs and medians for the City.
f) City construction of trash enclosures for City trash
bins were approved, and enforcement of the trash enclo-
sure ordinance City-wide was also authorized.
A plan for downtown sidewalks, coordinated with the
Chamber of Commerce, was approved to assure cleaner
sidewalks by their scrubbing in some fashion on an every
two week basis.
g)
h) The graffiti removal program was formally adopted by the
City Council. As implemented, the program emphasizes
speed of removal of graffiti from public and private
structures where they are visually polluting our
community.
i
While a functional maintenance item, the slurry sealing
of 50% of our asphalt/concrete streets during the year,
and their restriping, resulted in a much improved ap-
pearance of the infrastructure in our residential
neighborhoods.
17. Infrastructure improvements -
a) The City's first five-year capital improvement program
was developed and approved. Thirteen capital projects
were completed in 1989, while at least eight others have
begun. A more complete review of our capital programs
is available in the quarterly reports submitted by the
Public Works Department.
b) Sewer funding options - At the close of 1989, the analy-
sis of our funding options to replace our deteriorating
sewer system was nearing completion. This report should
give us better information in which to make an educated
decision on the cost effectiveness of the various fund-
ing options for replacement of the sewers in our
community.
c) The fire flow analysis was completed and is being used
to optimize available resources to improve the fire flow
capabilities of our City.
8
18. Utilization of Volunteers -
a) Existing programs are continuing.
19. Parking concerns -
a) Motorcycle parking area for the downtown users was pro-
vided on 14th Street. It is hoped that during our peak
periods, use of this discount lot by motorcyclists will
free up on -street parking spaces for others.
b) The driveway permit requirements were amended to allow
parking for compact cars in areas that are less than the
standard 18 feet in width. As more citizens apply to
take advantage of these new provisions, the number of
on -street parking spaces should increase considerably.
20. Public Safety -
a) Forfeiture funds revenues were increased, and their uses
were expanded. Principal uses are the Westnet special
force and the two -person Hermosa Beach special task
force.
b) A productivity system was created that resulted in a
considerable increase in activity by our patrol forces.
c) As noted in Item 5, enforcement of Council priority
areas increased substantially during the year.
d) A canine program was funded through community donations.
The dog was purchased and the officer and dog trained
during the year.
21. Community events -
a) The Halloween children's party was coordinated with the
Chamber of Commerce and the Women's Club.
b) An expanded tree lighting program was held in coordina-
tion with the Chamber of Commerce.
c) A new series of holiday events for children and families
were held by our Recreation and Parks Department during
the holiday season.
22. Architectural Review -
A recommendation was prepared to require architectural
review of all large projects, but it was not accepted by
the City Council. Staff continues to encourage ap-
propriate architectural treatment informally with
developers when no discretionary act is involved, and
via the Planning Commission when discretionary acts are
required.
9
23. Streamline Council meetings -
Staff continues to answer Council questions prior to the
meeting so that items need not be delayed for further
information. Also, the staff is continuing to attempt
to limit the number of times the same item is on the
agenda.
24. Public communication process -
a) City news bits were included in the new recreation
brochures, with future ones to have expanded room for
such information.
b) A process by which City employees can directly access
the Cable for printed messages on Channel 10 was
implemented.
c) The City continued to increase the utilization of news
releases to report activities of interest regarding our
community.
d) Fire Service Day and Red Ribbon Week were promoted for
the first time in many years during 1989.
e) Produced first comprehensive annual financial report to
demonstrate compliance with governmental accounting
standards and enhance communication of financial
information.
Other Activities Reported by Departments
1. Building -
a) In 1989, 84 new dwelling units were permitted, and 57
demolished, for a net increase of 27 dwelling units.
b) The consultant -produced seismic hazard mitigation pro-
gram for unreinforced masonry buildings was begun, with
66 buildings tentatively identified as being a concern.
This program is pursuant to state requirements to iden-
tify and rectify potential hazardous structures.
2. Planning -
a) The Joint Commuter Transit Study was completed and
should be inaugurated early in 1990 when the busses
arrive.
3. Public Works -
a) Due to an emergency caused by a sewer collapse, City
work crews constructed a new sewer line at_approximately
$22,000 less than lowest bid.
b) The Street Lighting Assessment paid by property owners
was reduced approximately 10% in 1989.
4. Community Resources -
a) Film permit processing was on the increase with 32 days
recorded between Memorial Day and Labor Day weekends.
Kevin B. Northc ft
City Manages
KBN/ld
t‘f
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning Director
SUBJECT: City Council / Planning Commssion Joint Meeting
DATE: January 16, 1990
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the following
topics be discussed at the February 15, 1990, meeting.
1. Goals, objectives, and policies for the Housing Element
2. Residential zoning standards to address the impact of bulky
structures
3. Parking requirements, including the 17 -foot setback
4. Objectives for downtown
5. Recycling program
6. Fees for Planning and Building applications
CITY MANAGER COMMENT:
A few other possible topics are: --�
Multi -use corridor wrap-up
Obtaining Coastal permitting, authority
Current schedule of Planning projects 4.,7 ���
ae
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 17, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
it l� � .
FROM: City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft L -%
RE: Topics for Joint Meeting with Chamber of Commerce
*****************************************************************
The following topics have been previously requested to be agen-
dized for the City Council's joint meeting with the Chamber of
Commerce. Please review, edit, and add as appropriate. The
agenda then will be finalized by the Chamber and City staffs,
using information from the Chamber's retreat held January 18-20,
1990, and the Council's prioritizing of the draft City Goals.
Note: The joint meeting is to be held at 7:30 a.m., Thursday,
February 22 in the Council Chambers.
Requested at the Council's December 9, 1989 Goals meeting
(Not prioritized)
1. Coordination of new resident welcome efforts
2. Ways to improve business' property maintenance
3. Consideration of a special board to represent downtown
businesses
4. Ways to improve representation of business interests on
specific issues by Chamber
(Downtown issues from January 11, 1990 Goals meeting)
5. Active campaign to clean-up downtown
6. Implement use change parking policy
7. Incentives for downtown business for facade changes
8. Consider closing off Pier Head (Hermosa to Pier) for
pedestrian mall
9. Look at re-establishing VPD as separate body and returning
Lot A, B, C, to Parking District
10. Improve property maintenance for downtown businesses (simi-
lar to #2)
11. City Council to take more active role with Chamber
- 1 -
9b
12. Review of Fiesta as to benefit to City vs. dollars expended
13. Do something "interesting" with pier (determine legal
limits)
14. Develop "consensus plan" for downtown/
cc: Wes Bush, Chamber of Commerce
r
MICHAEL J. VIZZIrTI ASSOCIATES
AN APPRAISAL REPORT
OF
THE BILTMORE SITE
AND
THE CITY OWNED PARKING.LOT
AS PART OF
THE 1985 SPECIFIC HOTEL PLAN
LOCATED IN
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
AS OF JUNE 15, 1988
PREPARED FOR
MR KEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CALIFORNIA
PREPARED BY
MICHAEL J. VIZZINI ASSOCIATES
721 SOUTH PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE C
REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
11
11
11
11
11
dJ
41
11
41• •
11
11
11
11
11
11
July 12, 1988
Mr. Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
MICHAEL J. VIZZINI ASSOCIATES --
r
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Civic Center
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885
RE: File No. VL -88-151
Vacant Land Appraisal
Biltmore Site and City Owned Parking Lot
As Part of The 1985 Specific Hotel Plan
Hermosa Beach, California
Dear: Mr. Northcraft:
•
We are pleased to present our appraisal of the fee
simple interests in the above captioned real properties.
The legal descriptions of the properties are in the Site
Description paragraph's within this report.
It is our opinion that the Fair Market Values of the
subject properties, based upon market conditions evident as
of June 15, 1988 are indicated as follows:
Biltmore Site as R-1 Zoning:
FOUR MILLION FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
$4,550,000
Biltmore Site as R -2B Zoning:
FOUR MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
$4,730,000
Biltmore Site as C-2 Zoning:
THREE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
$3,700,000
Biltmore Site as part of the 1985 Specific Hotel Plan:
.THREE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
$3,700,000
MICHAEL J. VIZZINI ASSOCIATES
Parking Lot as part of the 1985 Specific Hotel Plan.:
THREE MILLION SIX HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
$3,650,000
A complete analysis of the subject's physical and
economic characteristics was made to arrive at the
estimated Market Values. A study was made of existing
properties comparable to'the subject properties.
This letter of transmittal is part of the attached
report containing data, our analysis and conclusions. This
report is subject to the Certification and Limiting
Conditions.
Very truly yours,
MICHAEL J. VIZZINI ASSOCIATES
/6/a
;4'2 (14d‹. --ft.."
Michael J. Vizzifii, SRPA
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
LOCATION:
'OWNER:
PROPERTY TYPE:
'LAND AREA:
MICHAEL J. VIZZLNI ASSOCIATES
SUMMARY OF DATA AND CONCLUSIONS
Biltmore Site
Parking Lot
Biltmore Site: Northeast
corner of The Strand and 14th
Street. Parking Lot: North-
west corner of Hermosa
Avenue and 13th Street.
City of Hermosa Beach
Vacant Land
36,820± square feet
36,285± square feet
PRINCIPAL IMPROVEMENTS:
Biltmore Site, Currently
Vacant Land
HIGHEST AND BEST USE:
Parking Lot, Asphalt paved
open parking lot
Commercial and/or
Residential Development
with Re -Zoning Approval
from the City of Hermosa
Beach and The California
Coastal Commission.
VALUE INDICATED BY: Cost Approach N/A
Income Approach N/A
Direct Sales
Comparison Approach Biltmore Site as R-1' Zoning
$4,550,000
Biltmore Site as R -2B
Zoning
$4,730,000
Biltmore Site as C-2 Zoning
$3,700,000
Biltmore Site as part of
the•1985 Specific Hotel
Plan
$3,700,000
Parking lot as part of the
1985 Specific Hotel Plan
$3,650,000
VALUE DATE: June 15th 1988
r
1
0
a
1
1
MICHAEL J. VIZZLNI ASSOCIATES
DIRECT SALES COMPARISON APPROACH (continued)
Under present zoning laws, the minimum lot size for R-1
zoned sites is 4,000 square feet. A Site Plan overlay was
submitted by the City of Hermosa Beach Planning Department.
This overlay divides the site into eight separate lots. As
requested, this overlay was utilized.by us in analyzing the
property as if it were zoned R-1. The Site Plan overlay
designating the eight individual lots is on the following
page. The selected sales are then summarized and discussed.
25
i
r
r
1
i
1
a
1
v.
15 TH
MICHAEL J. VIZZINI ASSOCIATES
BILTMORE SITE -EIGHT LOT OVERLAY
PER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STREET
15 TH COURT
41-5
14 TH STREET'
•
•
26
i
MICHAEL J. VIZZINI ASSOCIATES
BILTMORE SITE -EIGHT LOT OVERLAY LOT SIZES
PER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOT AREAS
•
LOT A
LOT B
LOT C
LOT D
LOT E.
LOT F
LOT G
LOT. H
27
•
•
4040 SQ. FT.
4000 SQ. FT.
4000 SQ. FT.
4000 SQ. FT.
4000 SQ. FT.
4608 SQ. FT.
4795 SQ. FT.
4156.25 SQ. FT.
January 16, 1990
HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL January 23, 1990
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
DECEMBER 1989
Staff reports were prepared for the following:
1. 2 Tentative Parcel Maps
3. 1 Circulation Element
4. 4 Text Amendments
5. 2 Conditional Use Permits (Condominiums)
6. 2 Conditional Use Permits (Commercial)
7. 2 Conditional Use Permit Amendments
8. 1 Master Plan Review
9. 1 Oil EIR
10. 1 Variance
11. 1 Special Study
12. 1 Appeal of Planning Commission's denial of a variance
13. 1 1st Quarter General Plan Amendment
The following activities were undertaken for transit projects:
1. Routine tasks.
Meetings and seminars attended by the Planning Department Staff:
1. 32 meetings
Budget Update:
Ending 12/31/89, revenues were 10% above budget for 50% of FY
89-90.
Ending 12/31/89, expenditures were 9.6% below budget for 50% of
FY 89-90.
1
Transit Update:
"WAVE" Dial -A -Ride Ridership:
Hermosa Beach Passengers
Redondo Beach Passengers
Satellite Passengers
12/89
860
4,163
329
Last FY
12/88 FY to Date to Date
758 5,708 4,741
4,299 27,873 26,685
330 2,307 2,679
Upcoming agenda items to City Council:
1. 1 Text Amendment regarding height measurement & view blockage
2. 1 Definition of hardship for fee waiver
3. 1 Text Amendment regarding alcohol sales at gas stations
4. 1 Zone Change from C-3, R-1 & R-3 to Commercial SPA & R-3 to
R-2
CONCUR: l
A A /
Michael` Schubach
Planning Director
NOTED:
Kevin B. Nortficraft
City Manager
2
Respectfully submitted,
Andrea N. Anderson
Planning Aide
January 17, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting
the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 23, 1990
PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT DECEMBER ACTIVITY REPORT
Recruitment:
Completed recruitment and testing for the classifications of:
1. Assistant Engineer
2. Account Clerk
The Department met with representatives of STEP, an organization
which assists the Handicapped in finding employment. This was an
introductory meeting to explore possibilities for employment of
STEP participants.
Labor Relations:
The Department had the lead role in coordinating the annual
"Holiday Party".
Risk Management:
Completed renewal of the City's Property and Vehicle insurances.
Other:
Assisted the City Manager is coordinating the initial City Coun-
cil goal setting session.
General Appropriations Secretary:
The General Appropriations Secretary performs secretarial support
services for all City departments as well as directory assistance
for incoming calls and processing the City's mail. The following
summary indicates the amount of time spent on each of the assig-
ned functions.
December:
150 hours available
Word Processing*
73% (110.00 hrs)
Avg. 7.33 hrs/day
Personnel : 24%
Planning: : 14%
Public Works: 22%
Finance : 19%
City Manager: 21%
Mail
12%
Avg.
(26.50
(15.50
(24.50
(20.50
(23.00
Respectfullysubmitted,
4/4: / /
Processing
(17.50 hrs)
1.17 hrs/day
hrs)
hrs)
hrs)
hrs)
hrs)
Robert A. Blackwoo•, Director
Personnel & Risk Management
Directory/Dept Support
15% (22.50 hrs)
Avg. 1.5 hrs/day
Noted:
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
January 16, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City Council Meeting of
January 23, 1990
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES
DECEMBER, 1989 ACTIVITY REPORT
The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following
activities for the month of December:
RECREATION PROGRAMMING
▪ December 5: The Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony was held in
conjunction with the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce.
Approximately 200 individuals attended the event.
• December 6: The Children's Theatre Workshop ended their class
sessions with a presentation of "A Charlie Brown Christmas." The
presentation took place in the Hermosa Civic Theatre with
approximately 100 family and friends in attendance.
• December 16: The Hermosa Winter Holiday Event - "Sandman Snowman
Contest" took place on the beach on the north side of the Pier.
Approximately 40 people attended with 13 entries total.
▪ December 18: The Hermosa Winter Holiday Event - "Children's Cookie
Bake" was a huge success. Approximately 150 children attended.
• December 19: The Hermosa Winter Holiday Event - "Children's Craft
Night" took place at the Clark Building and attracted approximately
75 people.
• December 20: The Hermosa Winter Holiday Event - "Christmas Caroling
on the Beach" was held on the north side of the Pier with
with approximately 150 individuals in attendance.
COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION
• December 16: The Warren Miller Ski Film "White Magic" was shown in
the Hermosa Civic Theatre. A total of 320 tickets were sold. Total
revenue generated for this event was $1,079.45.
• We are currently preparing for the upcoming Gala to be held on
February 24, 1990. The Mardi Gras reception is in full swing with
some exciting surprises for everyone that attends.
MISCELLANEOUS
The Walking Club met for their 3rd monthly meeting. The Club has
approximately 25 members to date.
ti
FILM PERMITS
• A total of (2) permits were processed for (2) days of filming in
December. Permit fees of $1,300 were collected on behalf of the
City.
FACILITY RESERVATIONS
• There are currently 92 facility users.
• In December the department processed 18 facility reservations.
Facility User Hours
Field 73
Theatre 99
Clark 194
Gym 210
Room 4 110
Room '7 15
Room 8 128
Room 10 54
Room 12 48
DEPARTMENT REVENUE:
Current This Month FY Last Fy
Month Last Fy To Date To Date
$17,422.25 $13,683.93 $137,274.00 $102,044.77
Revenue Projection: $249,650
Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 50% of
the fiscal year is $137,274.00 or 55% of the projected figure.
Respectfully submitted,
Concur
G,511111P
Mary C. Toone
Act ng Director
De ► . of Community Resources
Noted;
evin B. Northcraft
City Manager
Terri Edison
Acting Coordinator
December 5, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the City -Council December -12, 1989
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES
NOVEMBER, 1989 ACTIVITY REPORT
The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the
following activities for the month of November:
SPECIAL EVENTS
• November 8 the Senior Citizen's Club excursion to the
"Spirit of LA Harbor Cruise" took place. Twenty-eight
seniors and one staff member attended. A good time was
"had by all." City subsidy of this event totaled $365.
• November 11 was the Richstone Center Walk-a-thon on the
Hermosa Beach Strand.
November 16 was the annual flu immunization clinic at the
Clark Building and 200 individuals were immunized.
RECREATION PROGRAMS
• Plans to move the ASAP (After School Recreation Program) to
Valley School are underway. In an effort to recruit
enrollees for this program, a screening of E.T. at the
Civic Theatre took place on November 30 for children.
• November 14, the Hermosa Beach Walking Club held their
second meeting. A flyer advertising the club will be
distributed at the Community Center and sporting good
stores in December.
COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION
The 1990 season brochure was completed. The Foundation has
funded a City-wide mailing of this flyer for the first week
in December.
SPECIAL MEETINGS
Staff attended School Board, Coordinating Council, Walking Club
and SCAATS meetings.
FACILITY RESERVATIONS
In November the Department processed 72 facility renters.
Facility User Hours
Field
Theatre
1
132
79
Clark 164
Gym 102
Room 4 179
Room 7 = 16.5
Room 8 186
Room 10 73
Room 12 77
DEPARTMENT REVENUE:
Current This Month FY Last Fy
Month Last Fy To Date To Date
$18,335.00 $13,175.75 $119,851.75 $88,360.84
Revenue Projection: $249,650
Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 41% of
the fiscal year is $119,851.75 or 48% of the projected figure.
Respectfully submitted,
Noted:
evin B. Northcraft
City Manager
Alava Mastrian-Handman
Director
Dept. of Community Resources
January 11, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting
the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 23, 1990
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DECEMBER ACTIVITY REPORT
PARKING ENFORCEMENT
Last
Current This Month Fiscal Year Fiscal Year
Month Last Year To Date To Date
Parking Cites Issued 4,623 4,211 43,688 42,679
Vehicles Impounded/Booted 32 49 244 277
Calls Responded To 138 107 800 743
Booting Revenue $1,663 $7,283 $22,817 $30,154
ANIMAL CONTROL
Citations Issued 86 55 476 320
Warnings Issued 4 0 4 1
Complaints Responded To 69 46 357 279
,
Total Number of Animals 59 25 351 308
Picked -Up of which:
Returned to Owner 17 11 106 81
Taken to Shelter 4 3 129 110
Injured, taken to Vet 2 0 19 14
Deceased 26 8 91 106
CONCUR:
enry'L. Staten, Acting
General Services Director
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
Respectfully submitted,
Henry L. Staten, Acting Director
by
Michele D. Tercero,
Administrative Aide
60,
December 12, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting
the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 23, 1990
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
NOVEMBER ACTIVITY REPORT
PARKING ENFORCEMENT
Last
Current This Month Fiscal Year Fiscal Year
Month Last Year To Date To Date
Parking Cites Issued 6,298 6,109 39,065 38,468
Vehicles Impounded/Booted 40 30 212 228
Calls Responded To 123 127 762 611
Booting Revenue $3,638 $1,187 $20,154 $22,871
ANIMAL CONTROL
Citations Issued 86 53 390
Warnings Issued 0 1 0
Complaints Responded To 58 26 288
Total Number of Animals 49 32 292
Picked -Up of which:
218
1
238
268
Returned to Owner 14 10 89 77
Taken to Shelter 23 11 125 96
Injured, taken to Vet 1 1 17 13
Deceased 11 10 65 81
CONCUR:
-HenrJ L. Staten, Acting
General Services Director
Kevin B. Nortbcraft
City Manager
Respectfully submitted,
Henry L. Staten, Acting Director
by
a
Michele D. Tercero,
Administrative Aide
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
CALENDAR YEAR 1989
DECEMBER
OFFENSES REPORTED
CURRENT
MONTH
CURRENT
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST YEAR
CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
LAST CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
1. Murder
0
0
1
3
2. Rape
1
1
5
5
3. Robbery
2
2
28
17
4. Assault
6
7
169
110
5. Burglary
11
24
316
291
6. Larceny
44
39
439
436
7. Motor Vehicle Theft
11
15
246
168
8. DUI
42
36
291
298
9. All Other Offenses
323
269
3520
3249
10. 415 Calls
241
*
1405
*
PERSONS ARRESTED
i nfll
CURRENT
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST YEAR
CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
LAST CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
1. Adults
100
110
1073
1082
2. Juveniles
0
0
0
3
3. Criminal Citations
147
71
1515
885
4. 5-24/5-42 HBMC
6
0
233
3
i nfll
1 f.V 1\V! VI\ 1
THIS MONTH
LAST YEAR
CURRENT
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST YEAR
CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
LAST CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
ACCIDENTS
0
0
2
0
1. Fatal
2. Injury
0
8
143
123
3. Property damage only
11
19
243
232
CITATIONS
521
575
4933
3921
1. Traffic Citations
2. Parking Citations
7
37
281
314
CALLS FOR SERVICE
* figures not available
NOTED:
G'#2;;7"
Kevin B. North raft, City Manager
fully ls emitted,
Steve Wisn ewski
Director of Public Safety
CURRENT
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST YEAR
CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
LAST CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
1. Total Calls
3040
1136
31345
20464
* figures not available
NOTED:
G'#2;;7"
Kevin B. North raft, City Manager
fully ls emitted,
Steve Wisn ewski
Director of Public Safety
Honorable Mayor and January 15, 1990
Members of the City Council
ACTIVITY REPORT
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
DECEMBER, 1989
Attached for your information are recap sheets of department ac-
tivity for the month of December as well as the quarterly report
of buildings completed and demolished from October 1, 1989 thru
December 31, 1989.
Overall permit activity remained steady in December as the
department issued 73 permits of which 21 were building permits.
Five permits were issued for new single family dwellings and nine
-permits were issued for alterations or additions to existing
dwellings. Two dwelling units were demolished resulting in a net
increase of three dwelling units to the housing inventory.
Building Department general fund revenue for 50% of the fiscal
year is $188,938.60 or 50.37 of projected revenue for the fiscal
year. Total revenue for all funds is $250,863.64.
The Business License division reports that 356 licenses were is-
sued during December resulting in revenue of $34,989.35. Business
License revenue to date represents 39.64% of projected revenue
for the fiscal year.
The department logged 14 new code enforcement complaints during
December, of which three were for illegal dwelling units. The
department currently has twenty-six illegal dwelling unit cases
under investigation.
Noted:
Kevin B. Northdraft
City Manager
Respectfully Submitted,
/K)//g."--
Wiliam Grove
Director, Bldg. & Safety
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT
Month of DECEMBER 1989
NUMBER OF CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY
PERMITS LAST FY DATE TO DATE
Building 21 45 160 209
Plumbing 30 25 176 141
Electric 22 28 151 141
Plan Check 18 22 81 89
Sewer Use -- 6 10 13
Res. Bldg.Reports 17 23 155 222
Comm. Inspections 9 8 78 97
Parks & Recreation 1 4 1 4
In lieu Park & Rec. 3 6 16 20
Board of Appeals 1 -- 3 1
Sign Review 4 1 21 14
Fire Flow Fees 8 18 45 60
TOTALS
134 186 897 1011
FEES
Building** 10,058.63
Plumbing 2,547.00
Electric 2,763.00
Plan Check 13,515.17
Sewer Use --
Res. Bldg. Reports 680.00
Comm. Inspections 225.00
Parks & Recreation 3,500.00
In lieu Park & Rec. 13,068.00
Board of Appeals 75.00
Sign Review 100.00
Fire Flow Fees 6,553.55
36,643.85
2,336.00
2,720.00
13,681.75
3,578.72
` 920.00
200.00
27,301.00
39,204.00
25.00
30,202.59
79,816.82 98,170.77
19,699.00 13,361.00
26,325.50 20,683.00
55,237.28 72,710.24
4,350.87 10,243.07
5,160.00 8,888.00
1,950.00 2,525.00
3,500.00 27,301.00
98,010.00 91,476.00
225.00 75.00
525.00 300.00
56,064.17 71,207.59
TOTALS 53,085.35 156,812.91 350,863.64 416,932.67
VALUATIONS 863,760 3,511,633 7,594,116 6,322,045
**Includes State Seismic Fee $67.42
1
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Month of DECEMBER 1989
TYPE OF STRUCTURE
DWELLING
UNITS
PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION
1. Single Dwellings 5 5 702,930
2. Duplex Dwellings
3. Triplex Dwellings
4. Four Units or More
-•5. Condominiums
6. Commercial Buildings
7. Industrial Buildings
8. Publicly Owned Buildings
9. Garages - Residential
10. Accessory Buildings
11. Fences and Walls 1 1,500
12. Swimming Pools
13. Alterations, additions or
repairs to dwellings 9 72,330
14. Alterations, additions or
repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 1 87,000
15. Alterations, additions or
repairs to indus. bldgs.
16. Alterations, additions or
repairs to publicly owned bldgs.
17. Alterations, additions, repairs
to garages or accessory bldgs.
18. Signs
19. Dwelling units moved
20. Dwelling units demolished 2
21. All other permits not listed 3
TOTAL PERMITS 21
TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS:
863,760
TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 5
TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 2
NET CHANGE: +3
NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 89/90 +26
CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 10,073
(INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED)
1
QUARTERLY REPORT FOR HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
BUILDINGS COMPLETED AND BUILDINGS DEMOLISHED
OCTOBER 1, 1989 THRU DECEMBER 31, 1989
ADDRESS NO. OF UNITS
532 llth Street
2526 Hermosa Ave.
638 6th Street
640 6th Street
1270 8th Street
1021 Loma Drive
1023 Loma Drive
722 9th Street
724 9th Street
316 8th Street
845 15th Street
847 15th Street
849 15th Street
1531 Bayview Drive
456 Oceanview
DEMOLISHED
ADDRESS
239 29th Street
1523 Golden Avenue
18 3rd Street
407 30th Street
1242 Owosso Avenue
641 6th Street
3 (Condo)
1 (SFR)
1 (Condo)
1 (Condo)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
1 (Condo)
1 (Condo)
1 (SFR)
1 (Condo)
1 (Condo)
1 (Condo)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
NO. OF UNITS
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
2 (Duplex)
1
DATE COMPLETED
10/3/89
10/3/89
10/4/89
10/4/89
10/4/89
10/12/89
10/12/89
10/24/89
10/24/89
11/8/89
11/14/89
11/14/89
11/14/89
12/5/89
12/6/89
DATE COMPLETED
11/7/89
11/8/89
11/15/89
12/12/89
12/14/89
12/27/89
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
INTER -OFFICE MEMO
TO: William Grove, Building & Safety Director
FROM: Mary Fehskens, Business License Inspector
RE: Monthly report for December
DATE: January 16, 1990
CURRENT
MONTH ,
THIS MONTH • FY TO
LAST FY DATE
LAST FY
TO DATE
$34,989.35 $35,373.02 $176,403.85 $211,894.66
NEW LICENSES ISSUED DURING DECEMBER 1989 27
Out of city licenses 18
Home Occupation license 3
New business licenses issued 5
New owners of existing business 1
Business License Renewals mailed 446
New and Renewal licenses mailed 356
Delinquent Notices mailed 414
HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
CALENDAR YEAR 1989
DECEMBER
FIRE STATISTICS
PARAMEDIC STATISTICS
CURRENT
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST YEAR
CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
LAST CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
1. Total Calls
75
77
800
802
(TYPE)
a. False Alarm
2
2
57
47
b. Mutual Aid
1
0
6
11
c. Paramedic Assists
43
41
412
438
d. Residence Fire
8
11
81
59
e. Commercial Fire
1
8
47
30
f. Vehicle Fire
2
*
23
*
g. Hazardous Mtls.
2
*
27
*
h. Other
16
15
146
217
PARAMEDIC STATISTICS
1. Mutual Aid
CURRENT
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST YEAR
CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
LAST CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
1. Total Responses
78
80
996
1014
(TYPE)
a. No Patient/Aid
6
11
77
137
b. Medical
33
39
377
403
c. Trauma
39
30
527
453
1. Mutual Aid
0
1
0
2
2. Auto Accident
21
14
198
163
3. Strand Accident
6
6
99
94
4. Assault
4
6
107
61
5. Jail
5
6
99
61
6. Transports
37
34
502
391
7. Base Hosp.Con.
23
17
272
302
8. Trauma Center
0
2
8
10
INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION
figures not available
NOTED:
,Kevin
Northcraaft, City Manager
R
Steve Wis'iews
Director of Public Safety
ubmitted,
CURRENT
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST YEAR
CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
LAST CALENDAR
YEAR TO DATE
1. Commercial
76
67
1079
944
2. Assembly
0
0
10
2
3. Apartments
23
30
591
371
4. Fumigations
8
8
182
157
5. Institutions
0
0
16
9
6. Industrial
0
0
9
10
figures not available
NOTED:
,Kevin
Northcraaft, City Manager
R
Steve Wis'iews
Director of Public Safety
ubmitted,
4.
January 10, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 23, 1990
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - DECEMBER 1989
The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major
functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance.
ADMINISTRATION
To coordinate and blend the efforts of all divisions of the
Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the
City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and
administration of capital improvement projects.
Permits Issued:
Type
Current
Month
This Month FY Last FY
Last FY To Date To Date
Sewer Demolition
Sewer Lateral
Street Excavation
Utility Co's only
Dumpster/Lumber Drop
Banner Permits
3
2
5
14
1
0
5
3
10
6
1
0
ENGINEERING
Status of Current Capital Improvement Projects:
The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress
are:
CIP 85-102
CIP 85-137
16
8
37
103
12
7
28
8
46
114
•11
4
CIP 89-141
CIP 89-142
CIP 89-149
CIP 88-174
CIP 88-406
Highland Ave. Wide.
FAU, Asphaltic Over-
lay, Valley/Ardmore
Pavement Mgmt. System
Sidewalk Repairs
Bus Shelters
Overlay Prospect
Sewer Rehab/Area 4
CIP 88-407
CIP 89-506
CIP 89-512
CIP 89-612
CIP 89-613
CIP 89-615
MAINTENANCE
Sewer Bonding
Various Park Imp.
Basketball Courts
City Wide Signs
Community Center
Electrical Upgrade
Comm. Ctr. Fire Alarm
The maintenance division of the Public Works Department is
divided into the following sections:
- Parks/Medians
- Street Maintenance/Sanitation
- Sewer and Storm Drains
- Street Lighting
- Traffic Safety
- Building Maintenance
- Equipment Service
iParks Division: Irrigation repairs City-wide. Miscellaneous
tree trimming City-wide. Repaired swings on the beach and repair
of broken water main under the fishing pier. Planter box repair
in median at 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue.
Street Maintenance: Assisted the sewer crew with installation of
new sewer pump at 33rd Street and Ingleside and with the
construction and installation of ladder in pump station.
Repaired sand gates. Removed and replaced raised sidewalks 1300
Block of Valley Drive. Worked on block wall in City parking lot
1100 block Valley Drive.
Street Lighting: Installed new light fixtures and conduit in
City Manager's and Personnel Director's offices. Installed
cameras on fishing pier. Removed, repaired and replaced two fan
motors on the Police Department roof. Installed and removed
electrical lines for Kiwanis Christmas tree lot.
Traffic Safety Division: Continued work on the installation of
traffic -control signs. New posts and directional signs installed
on Palm Drive. Removed graffiti on the fishing pier and City
wide.
Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Repaired water main at the end of
fishing pier. Installed new sewer pump and rebuilt steps at the
33rd Street and Ingleside pump station. Cleaned storm drain
inlets City wide. Checked and rodded sewer lines throughout the
City.
Building Maintenance Division: Worked on remodel in City Manager
and Personnel Office. Put down non-skid paint on steps at City
Hall, library and the Police Station. Community Center: Patched
and painted walls in Theatre Foyer. Sanded and finished steps of
stage in theatre.
Equipment Service: - Parts inventory and on-going vehicle
maintenance. Major repairs on crawler.
Res
- tfully submit I-
J
Al ) tti/
An " ny Antich -
Director of Pu lc Works
d, Noted:
mon2/pwadmin
:mv
j 4/ 1
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
January 18, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 23, 1990
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ACTIVITY REPORT, DECEMBER 1989
- The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report was compiled and submitted to
the national and state finance organizations. Feedback on the report
should be received in the next few months
- Bank of America demonstrated their most sophisticated payroll system at
City Hall. We are now awaiting a cost proposal.
STATISTICAL SECTION
CURRENTMONTHI PMONTHUS ITLASTMONTH
YEAR I YEAR
DATEO
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
CITATION PAYMENTS 3,710 .4,344 3,680 30,189 30,561
INVOICES 1 42 2 69 46
CASH RECEIPTS 1,146 1,249 1,047 7,630 7,123
WARRANTS 125 270 185 1,615 1,672
PURCHASE ORDERS 185 297 203 1,920 1,690
UUT EXEMPTIONS 606 604 593
FILED TO DATE
PAYROLL FULL TIME 162 163
PART TIME 50 54
Noted:
evin B. Northbraft
City Manager
150
46
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
January 18, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 23, 1990
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ACTIVITY REPORT, NOVEMBER 1989
- The department had a turnover in the two account clerk positions. One
long term employee moved to another area and Sherria Lawrence accepted
a position in the Business License Division. She will remain in the
department until January 1, however, to facilitate training.
- The City Manager, City Treasurer, Finance Director and Assistant
Engineer met with Ken Swenson of Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Younger to
review issues relating to the acquisition of the right-of-way.
A claim for reimbursement of mandated costs for CPR masks was filed
with the State ($763).
STATISTICAL SECTION
CURRENTMONTHI PMONTHUS ITLASTMONTH
YEAR I YEAR
DATEO I LTOTDATEYEAR
CITATION PAYMENTS 4,344 5,236 4,793 26,479 26,881
INVOICES 42 10 5 68 44
CASH RECEIPTS 1,249 1,378 1,033 6,484 6,076
WARRANTS 270 304 277 1,490 1,487
PURCHASE ORDERS 297 396 277 1,735 1,487
UUT EXEMPTIONS 604 604 591
FILED TO DATE
PAYROLL FULL TIME 163 164
PART TIME 54 54
Noted:
even B. Northcraft
City Manager
145
45
Viki Copeland
Finance Director