The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-09-2021 - Agenda Pkg - CC Regular MeetingTuesday, February 9, 2021 6:00 PM City of Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 City Council Mayor Justin Massey Mayor Pro Tem Michael Detoy Councilmembers Stacey Armato Mary Campbell Regular Meeting Agenda Closed Session - CANCELED Regular Meeting - 6:00 PM Duly Posted on February 4, 2021 at 11:50 p.m. by E.S. Executive Team Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Viki Copeland, Finance Director Marnell Gibson, Public Works Director Paul LeBaron, Chief of Police Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Vanessa Godinez, Human Resources Manager Kelly Orta, Community Resources Manager City Treasurer Karen Nowicki City Attorney Michael Jenkins Suja Lowenthal, City Manager PLEASE NOTE: This is a full Packet including all pages and sub-pages, of all staff-reports and other materials of each agenda item as if physically stacked together and represents the complete agenda Packet as a single PDF file as of the date and time the agenda was initially posted (unless otherwise indicated here). It is meant to be an aid, but not intended as a replacement for the 'Living' agenda. This full Packet does not contain additions, modifications, or supplementals that have been added after the first posting of the 'Living' agenda unless indicated here. To prevent time downloading, and re-downloading, you might download this single PDF to your computer to have available for multiple reference, or to re-reference, to avoid the necessity of needing to be connected to the Internet or being held up by a slow-connection or slow server. For a particular item(s), you may desire to ensure that you are viewing all additions, modifications, or supplementals posted after the original agenda packet's posting by utilizing the link to the 'Living' agenda as displayed on the city's website Agenda/Minutes page which for this agenda is: 02-09-21 Regular City Council Agenda. Note again, that the agenda appearing below the following items' page number table may have changed and represents the page numbers to the agenda and materials contained in this full agenda packet only. The agenda-items page number table below provides the starting page of each item in this full contiguous packet PDF file. To better utilize these page numbers, note that the Adobe Acrobat reader has a feature to display page thumb-nails down the left edge of your screen. With the page-thumbnails displayed you may click on a page's thumb- nail to immediately move to the item's starting page directly. Be aware, that as this full packet may include MINUTES of prior meetings, if searching the entire Packet for particular text, understand that when you find such text, that if it is within a MINUTES page of minutes, that are included in this agenda for approval, that it may appear to you that you are at an agenda item within the current agenda. Avoid such confusion by noting that pages that contain MINUTES included for approval are so identified at the top of each such page within this full packet. Agenda Item No. Starting Page Ending Page Agenda 114 COVID‐19 UPDATE BCHD 15 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE SERVICES AND MCCORMICK AMBULANCE 2020 ANNUAL REVIEW 16 76 RECOGNIZING MAUREEN HUNT FOR HER SERVICE TO THE CITY AS HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESIDENT/CEO 77 77 CITY MANAGER REPORT COVID‐19 Update 78 78 UPDATE FROM CHIEF LEBARON ON COVID‐ 19 EMERGENCY ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS 79 79 INTRODUCTION OF INTERIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR, JOHN JONES 80 80 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION 81 81 UPDATES FROM AD HOC COMMITTEES 94 94 Consent Calendar 11a 95 103 11b 104 120 11c 121 124 11d 125 135 PUBLIC HEARING 13a 136 165 13b 166 177 Municipal Matters 14a 178 214 14b 215 225 14c 226 259 14d 260 465 14e 466 476 14f 477 493 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 15a 494 522 15b 523 528 February 9, 2021 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Packet February 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda VIEWING OPTIONS FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS Public meetings are broadcast live on Spectrum Channel 8 and Frontier Channel 31 in Hermosa Beach. Additional viewing options are provided as a courtesy. ZOOM: Join the meeting link if available or participate by phone YOUTUBE CHANNEL: www.youtube.com/channel/UCaiZxw06ue-Tgc8DmXYzh2Q CITY WEBSITE: www.hermosabeach.gov and visit the Agendas/Minutes/Videos page ***PLEASE NOTE: IF YOU EXPERIENCE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES WHILE VIEWING THE MEETING ON ONE OF THESE PLATFORMS, PLEASE TRY ONE OF THE OTHER VIEWING OPTIONS*** Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021 February 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 6:00 P.M. - REGULAR AGENDA PUBLIC PARTICIPATION City Hall will be closed to the public until further notice. Virtual Meetings are held pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on March 17, 2020. Members of the public may email comments to Esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov or submit eComments until 4:00 p.m. on the meeting date. Members of the public may also participate by phone. JOIN THE VIRTUAL MEETING AT: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87032785286?pwd=RGVVZnduNGVIVGJLOFlvaFNuYTBlUT09 OR PARTICIPATE BY PHONE: •Toll Free: 877-853-5257 •Meeting ID: 870 3278 5286 •Participant ID: 513185 ATTENDEES WILL BE MUTED UNTIL THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PERIOD IS OPENED. If you are joining by phone, press * 6 to unmute your line. Comments from the public are limited to 3 minutes per speaker. Oral and Written Communication Persons who wish to have written materials included in the agenda packet at the time the agenda is published on the City's website must submit the written materials to the City Manager's office by email (esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov) or in person by noon of the Tuesday, one week before the meeting date. Written materials pertaining to matters listed on the posted agenda received after the agenda has been posted will be added as supplemental materials under the relevant agenda item on the City's website at the same time as they are distributed to the City Council by email. Supplemental materials may be submitted via eComment (instructions below) or emailed to esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov. Supplemental materials must be received before 4:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting to ensure Council and staff have the ability to review materials prior to the meeting. Supplemental materials submitted after 4:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting or submitted during the meeting will be posted online the next day. Submit Supplemental eComments in three easy steps: Note: Your comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information (i.e. phone numbers, addresses, etc) that you do not want to be published. 1. Go to the Agendas/Minutes/Video webpage and find the meeting you’d like to submit comments on. Click on the eComment button for your selected meeting. 2. Find the agenda item for which you would like to provide a comment. You can select a specific agenda item/project or provide general comments under the Oral/Written Communications item. 3. Sign in to your SpeakUp Hermosa Account or as a guest, enter your comment in the field provided, provide your name, and if applicable, attach files before submitting your comment. Page 3 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021 February 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. CLOSED SESSION REPORT V. ANNOUNCEMENTS - UPCOMING CITY EVENTS VI. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:This is the time for the City Council to change the order in which it takes up items on this agenda, remove and/or continue agenda items and pull items from the consent calendar for separate consideration. VII. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS a.21-0082 COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT b.REPORT 21-0036 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE SERVICES AND MCCORMICK AMBULANCE 2020 ANNUAL REVIEW (Emergency Management Coordinator Brandy Villanueva) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the 2020 annual Los Angeles County Fire Services and McCormick Ambulance report reviewing the period of January through December 2020. 1. RCC Call Transfer Report for 2020 2. 2020 LACoFD Annual Call Transfer Report 3. Hermosa Beach Apparatus Responses 3rd_ 4th Qtr 2020 4. 2020 LACoFD Incident and McCormick Transports 5. 2020 AUTO AID 6. 2020 Community Engagement Photos 7. 2020 Film Permits_JanDec 2020 Attachments: c.21-0084 RECOGNIZING MAUREEN HUNT FOR HER SERVICE TO THE CITY AS HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESIDENT/CEO VIII. CITY MANAGER REPORT - The City Manager and staff may provide brief reports on pending City business. Longer oral reports to be provided are as follows: a.21-0085 COVID-19 UPDATE Page 4 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021 February 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda b.21-0090 UPDATE FROM CHIEF LEBARON ON COVID-19 EMERGENCY ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS c.21-0087 INTRODUCTION OF INTERIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR, JOHN JONES IX. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -- ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC: This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction not on this agenda, on items on this agenda as to which public comment will not be taken (City Manager Reports, City Councilmember Reports Consent Calendar items that are not pulled for separate consideration and Future Agenda Items), on written communications, and to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar. Public comments on the agenda items called City Manager Reports, City Councilmembers Reports, Consent Calendar items that are not pulled for separate consideration and Future Agenda Items will only be heard at this time. Further, comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Members of the audience may also speak during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration; during Public Hearings; and, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. All comments from the public under this agenda item are limited to three minutes per speaker, but this time allotment may be reduced due to time constraints. The City Council acknowledges receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in oral and written communications, except that the Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda. Speakers with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are encouraged to submit those comments directly to the City Manager. a.21-0102 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the written communication. 1. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION from Matt McCool (Submitted 2-2-21 at 9.44 a.m.) 2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION from Matt McCool (Submitted 2-2-21 at 11.57 a.m.) Attachments: X. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS: Councilmembers may briefly respond to public comments, may ask a question for clarification or make a brief announcement or report on his or her own activities or meetings attended. a.21-0088 UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES Page 5 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021 February 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda XI. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following matters will be acted upon collectively with a single motion and vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. Councilmembers may orally register a negative vote on any consent calendar item without pulling the item for separate consideration prior to the vote on the consent calendar. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar, either under Approval of the Agenda or under this item prior to the vote on the consent calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item XII (12), with public comment permitted at that time. The title is deemed to be read and further reading waived of any ordinance listed on the consent calendar for introduction or adoption. a.REPORT 21-0089 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES (City Clerk Eduardo Sarmiento) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following minutes: 1. January 26, 2021 Regular Meeting 1-26-21 Meeting MinutesAttachments: b.REPORT 21-0094 CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the following check registers. 1. 1-14-21 2. 1-21-21 Attachments: c.REPORT 21-0097 ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 2021 Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of January 5, 2021. PR Minutes 01.05.2021Attachments: d.REPORT 21-0045 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE SERVICES AND AMBULANCE MONTHLY REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2020 (Emergency Management Coordinator Brandy Villanueva) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the December 2020 Fire and Ambulance monthly report. Fire and Ambulance Monthly Report_November 2020Attachments: XII. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION - Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be handled separately. Public comment will be taken prior to Council deliberation and action on each item pulled from the Consent Calendar. Page 6 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021 February 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda XIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M. a.REPORT 21-0099 APPROVAL OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION’S RECOMMENDATION TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BEACH VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION’S (SCVA) BEACH VOLLEYBALL EVENTS TO THE 2021 SPECIAL EVENT CALENDAR ON MARCH 27, APRIL 10 AND MAY 8-9 (Community Resources Manager Kelly Orta) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission's recommendation to include the addition of the Southern California Beach Volleyball Association's (SCVA) beach volleyball events to the 2021 Special Event Calendar on the following days: 1. Saturday, March 27; 2. Saturday, April 10; and 3. Saturday, May 8-Sunday, May 9. 1. 2021 Tentative Special Events Calendar 2. SCVA Beach Events Special Event Application Attachments: b.REPORT 21-0101 CONSIDERATION OF THE ALLOCATION OF APPROXIMATELY $63,073 OF FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS FOR ADA RELATED SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS, AND TO CONSIDER RE-ALLOCATION FROM PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CDBG FUNDED PROJECTS TO A NEW PROGRAM TO PROVIDE GRANTS TO ELIGIBLE SMALL BUSINESSES TO ASSIST IN THEIR RECOVERY FROM THE PANDEMIC (Continued from January 26, 2021) (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions to: 1. Allocate the FY 2021-22 CDBG Budget towards the FY 2022-23 project for ADA related sidewalk improvement projects; and 2. Allocate $110,000 of CDBG funds towards the small business grant assistance program to assist local businesses in recovering from the Pandemic by: a. Reallocating $37,479 of COVID-19 CV (Coronavirus) funds from a previously identified project for hands free equipment at City Hall; and b. Allocating $72,521 in unspent funds accumulated from previous year's allocations. 1. Draft Resolution Approving FY 2021-22 CDBG Budget 2. Draft Resolution Approving Funds for Small Business Grant Program 3. Small Business Grant Assistance Program Information.pdf Attachments: XIV. MUNICIPAL MATTERS Page 7 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021 February 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda a.REPORT 21-0106 ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING PORTIONS OF AND CLARIFYING THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON RESIDENTIAL EVICTIONS TO COMPORT WITH RECENT CHANGES IN STATE LAW AND SETTING FORTH THE FACTS CONSTITUTING SUCH URGENCY (City Attorney Michael Jenkins) (Assistant City Attorney Lauren Langer) Recommendation:Staff recommends that City Council Adopt an Urgency Ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach to extend portions of and clarify the temporary moratorium on residential evictions to comport with recent changes in state law and setting forth the facts constituting such urgency (Attachment 1). The urgency ordinance requires four-fifths vote of the city council and if approved, will take effect immediately. 1. Urgency Ord re Eviction Moratorium_Extending Duration 06.30.21-CLEAN 2. Urgency Ord re Eviction Moratorium_Extending Duration 06.30.21 REDLINE 3. Table of COVID-19 Related Items Attachments: b.REPORT 21-0096 APPROVAL OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION’S RECOMMENDED LANGUAGE UPDATES TO THE SPECIAL EVENT FEE WAIVER POLICY TO ALLOW ELIGIBILITY TO RELIGIOUS GROUPS; AND DESIGNATION OF A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF FEE WAIVERS TO BE GRANTED FOR SPECIAL EVENTS HELD IN 2021 (Community Resources Manager Kelly Orta) Recommendation:Staff recommends that City Council: 1. Approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission's recommendation to update the Special Event Fee Waiver Policy to allow fee waiver consideration for religious groups; and 2. Designate a maximum amount of $20,000 in fee waivers to be granted for special events held in 2021. 1. Special Event Fee Waiver Policy 2. Proposed Special Event Fee Waiver Policy Attachments: c.REPORT 21-0052 A SAFER PROSPECT TRAFFIC SAFETY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Continued from January 26, 2021 (Environmental Analyst Leeanne Singleton) Page 8 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021 February 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Review and approve the draft traffic safety demonstration project concepts, as recommended by the Public Works Commission, for the Prospect Corridor (Attachment 1); 2. Adopt a Resolution (Attachment 2) authorizing the installation of the temporary traffic safety demonstration project on Prospect Avenue and determining the project is categorically exempt under CEQA; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to sign the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Southern California Association of Governments (Attachment 3) for the temporary installation of the traffic safety demonstration project concepts from March through approximately June 2021. 1. HB Public Works Commission Recommended Design Concepts 2. Council Resolution Authorizing Prospect Temporary Demonstration Project 3. Hermosa Beach SCAG MOU 4. Hermosa Beach Survey Summary 5. A Safer Prospect Project Website Attachments: d.REPORT 21-0080 AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS TO PROVIDE ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Award a Professional Services Agreement to Civil Works Engineers (CWE), Inc., Onward Engineering, and to TAIT & Associates, Inc., for an amount not-to-exceed $300,000 each, to provide on-call Engineering design services for street improvements to the City of Hermosa Beach for three years with the option to extend for up to two additional one-year terms; and 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the Professional Services Agreement(s) subject to approval by the City Attorney. 1. RFQ 20-06.pdf 2a. CWE Proposal.pdf 2b. Onward Proposal.pdf 2c. TAIT Proposal.pdf 3a. CWE Fee Schedule.pdf 3b. Onward Fee Schedule.pdf 3c. TAIT Fee Schedule.pdf 4. Fees Schedule Table.pdf 5a. CWE Agreement 5b. Onward Agreement 5c. TAIT Agreement Attachments: e.REPORT 21-0100 UAS (DRONE) PROGRAM (Police Chief Paul LeBaron) Page 9 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021 February 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the City of Redondo Beach for an Unmanned Aerial Support (UAS) program; and 2. Approve the expenditure of $30,000 to join Redondo Beach Police Department's UAS program. 1. MOU for unmanned aerial support cooperation 2. O3.73 - Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations policy Attachments: f.REPORT 21-0103 2020 LOCAL AGENCY BIENNIAL NOTICE REGARDING THE CITY’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE (City Clerk Eduardo Sarmiento) Recommendation:Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving and adopting the amended Conflict of Interest Code pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974. 1. Conflict of Interest Code 2020 (Final) 2. Conflict of Interest Code 2020 (Legislative) 3. Resolution of Adoption of 2020 Conflict of Interest Code 4. 2020 Local Agency Biennial Notice Attachments: XV. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items and questions from Councilmembers regarding the status of future agenda items. No discussion or debate of these requests shall be undertaken; the sole action is whether to schedule the item for consideration on a future agenda. No public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The existing list of future agenda items below is for information only. a.21-0105 COUNCILMEMBERS ARMATO AND CAMPBELL REQUEST THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADD TO THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AN ITEM TO CONSIDER SUBMITTING A COMMENT LETTER FOR THE LAX LANDSIDE ACCESS MODERNIZATION PROGRAM DRAFT EIR 1. PRESENTATION_ATMP SBCCOG Board_1_28_21 FINAL PPT-converted-compressed 2. LAWA Discussion Points 1-8-21 Attachments: b.21-0104 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Tentative Future Agenda.pdfAttachments: XVI. ADJOURNMENT Page 10 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021 February 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda FUTURE MEETINGS AND CITY HOLIDAYS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS: February 23, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting March 3, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session March 9, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting March 18, 2021 - Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Joint Meeting with School Board March 23, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting April 7, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session April 13, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting April 21, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - FY 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program April 27, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting May 5, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session May 11, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting May 25, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting May 27, 2021 - Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Budget Study Session June 2, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session June 8, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting (Budget Adoption) June 22, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting July 7, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session July 13, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting July 22, 2021 - Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Joint Meeting with all Boards/Commissions July 27, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting Page 11 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021 February 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - CONTINUED: August 10, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting August 24, 2021 - Tuesday - No Meeting (Dark) September 1, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session September 14, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting September 28, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting October 6, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session October 12, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting October 23, 2021 - Saturday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 9:00 AM - City Council Retreat October 26, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting November 3, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session November 9, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting (Mayor Transition) November 23, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting December 14, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting December 28, 2020 - Tuesday - No Meeting (Dark) 6:00 PM - Study Session June 8, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting (Budget Adoption) June 22, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting July 7, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session July 13, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting July 22, 2021 - Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Joint Meeting with all Boards/Commissions July 27, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting Page 12 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021 February 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS: March 1, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting March 2, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting March 16, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting March 17, 2021 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting April 5, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting April 20, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting May 3, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting May 4, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting May 18, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting May 19, 2021 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting June 1, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting June 7, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting June 15, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting July 6, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting July 12, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting July 21, 2021 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting July 20, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting August 2, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting August 3, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting August 17, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting September 13, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting September 21, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 2021 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting October 4, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting October 5, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting October 19, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting November 1, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting November 2, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting November 16, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting November 17, 2021 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting December 6, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting December 7, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting December 13, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting CITY OFFICES CLOSED FRIDAY-SUNDAY AND ON THE FOLLOWING DAYS: January 18, 2021 - Monday - Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday February 15, 2021 - Monday - President's Day May 31, 2021 - Monday - Memorial Day July 5, 2021 - Monday - Independence Day Observed September 6, 2021 - Monday - Labor Day November 11, 2021 - Thursday - Veteran's Day November 25, 2021 - Thursday - Thanksgiving Day Page 13 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0082 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0036 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE SERVICES AND MCCORMICK AMBULANCE 2020 ANNUAL REVIEW (Emergency Management Coordinator Brandy Villanueva) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the 2020 annual Los Angeles County Fire Services and McCormick Ambulance report reviewing the period of January through December 2020. Executive Summary: The 2020 annual review of the fire and ambulance transport services provided by Los Angeles County Fire Department and McCormick Ambulance,respectively,marks the culmination of the third year of the annexation agreement with Los Angeles County Fire Department and contract with McCormick Ambulance.Staff continues to monitor the trends associated with the services provided to ensure that excellent customer service is provided to the community. Background: On December 31,2017,the City of Hermosa Beach transitioned fire and emergency transport services to Los Angeles County Fire Department and McCormick Ambulance.Los Angeles County Fire Department has a ten-year agreement with the City while McCormick Ambulance has a five-year agreement with the City.During the initial transition of services,a fire services update was requested. At the time,it was determined that a quarterly review would be provided to City Council with the expectation to revisit the frequency of the reports at a future date.At the February 11,2020 City Council meeting,Council transitioned the frequency of the report from quarterly to semi-annually with the inclusion of the call transfer data in the monthly reports.In addition,the monthly fire and ambulance report was requested to be added to the consent calendar.On the July 14,2020 City Council agenda,the monthly reports for February through May 2020 services were approved.The June 2020 monthly report is on the August 25,2020 City Council agenda for approval.This report signifies the review of the services provided to the community throughout 2020. Analysis: The South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority,known as RCC is the initial public-safety answering point (PSAP)for police and fire services within the City of Hermosa Beach.When RCC City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 6 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0036 answering point (PSAP)for police and fire services within the City of Hermosa Beach.When RCC receives a call for service,the dispatcher collects critical data including name,phone number, address,and nature of the emergency.For police related incidents,RCC continues to gather additional information from the caller and dispatches police personnel as necessary.For fire related incidents,the critical data is collected,and the caller is transferred to the Los Angeles County Fire Department Dispatch (LACoFD)center.A LACoFD dispatcher gathers all information needed to dispatch fire and EMS personnel,accordingly.The critical information is collected by RCC,as a safeguard,prior to transferring the call to LACoFD.Should the call be dropped during the transfer and/or there is a change in the status of the patient calling for assistance,RCC can try to reconnect with the caller and relay the information to LACoFD,who can dispatch resources based on the information gathered.Total call time begins when the call is initiated with RCC to the arrival of units on scene. In 2020,RCC transferred a total of 780 calls to the Los Angeles County Fire Department dispatch center with an average transfer time of 48 seconds.Attachment 1 provides the RCC annual call transfer time for 2020.Attachment 2 provides the LACoFD call processing information for 2020. During July through December 2020,Los Angeles County Fire Department responded to 390 incidents with an average response time of 4:43 minutes.Los Angeles County Fire Department defines the Average Response Time as the time that the first-arriving units,which excludes the Lifeguard units,are en route and arrive at each incident and includes emergency and non-emergency calls.Dispatch and turnout time are not included in the Los Angeles County Fire Department average response time.Attachment 3 provides an overview of the fire an ambulance response between July and December of 2020. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 2 of 6 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0036 In 2019, Los Angeles County Fire Department responded to 1,616 calls for service with an average response time of 4:56 minutes. In 2020, Los Angeles County Fire Department responded to 1,684 total incidents with an average response time of 4:82 minutes.Los Angeles County Fire Department received 68 more calls for service during 2020 compared to 2019. Attachment 4 provides the incident type and average response times for all responses in 2020. The Los Angeles County Fire Department continues to provide automatic aid to neighboring jurisdictions.The surrounding jurisdictions responded into Hermosa Beach to provide automatic aid 19 times between January and December of 2020 while Los Angeles County Fire Department responded 109 times into Area G cities to provide automatic aid.In 2019,surrounding jurisdictions responded into Hermosa Beach 18 times and Los Angeles County Fire Department responded 213 times into Area G cities.Attachment 5 illustrates the January through December 2020 auto aid responses provided by both the fire district (Los Angeles County Fire Department)and Area G cities (El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, and Torrance Fire Departments). Special Events: On March 14,2020,all special events typically held in Hermosa Beach were canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic.As the City continues to navigate the COVID-19 pandemic restriction,should large events be allowed in 2021,Los Angeles County Fire will be included in the planning of the City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 3 of 6 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0036 large events be allowed in 2021,Los Angeles County Fire will be included in the planning of the events.Attachment 6 shows various community engagement photos. Fire Station Construction: The fire station construction was completed in August of 2020. Fire personnel moved into the station and began to provide services from the station in September of 2020. City and fire staff worked together to develop a virtual station tour and provided a briefing to Council at the September 8, 2020. The virtual station tour can be viewed at <https://www.hermosabeach.gov/our-community/quick-links/city-projects/fire-station-100-construction -project>. In addition, Leadership Hermosa Class of 2020 were recognizing for the installation of the new flagpole and dedication bricks in front of the station. This section will be removed from the report as part of the 2021 semi-annual report as the fire station construction has been completed. Fire Prevention: Station 100 conducted 103 inspections as part of the 2020 Annual Business Fire Inspection program. In 2019,Station 100 conducted 562 inspections.There was a significant decrease in the number of inspections conducted in 2020 due to COVID-19.Los Angeles County Fire Department implemented policies to protect the firefighters including the delaying businesses inspections.Along with LACoFD policies,businesses were closed for a portion of the year as part of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Officer Orders issued to decrease the spread of COVID-19.As businesses and LACoFD continue to navigate the pandemic, business inspections will increase. Table 2: Quarterly Annual Business Fire Inspection Results Inspection Category Number of Inspections Passed 74 Reinspections 0 Vacant 11 Closed 18 Total 103 Film Permits: Community Resources and Los Angeles County Fire Department approved eight film permits during 2020.Due to the pandemic,film permits were not issued between March 14,2020 through October 2020.Attachment 7 provides additional details related to the film permits that were approved during 2020. Table 3: Ann ual Film Permits Month # of Film Permits Locations January 1 The Beach at Longfellow Avenue February 4 Downtown: Various locations, 11 th Street and the Strand on the beach, Private Property, Hermosa Ave and Herondo Street on the beach. March 2 Longfellow Ave. and the Strand on the Beach and 32 nd Place/33 rd Street and the Strand on the beach April 0 May 0 June 0 July 0 August 0 September 0 October 0 November 1 Moondust Parkette and Private Residence December 1 Pier Plaza and the Pier Total 9 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 4 of 6 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0036 Table 3: Ann ual Film Permits Month # of Film Permits Locations January 1 The Beach at Longfellow Avenue February 4 Downtown: Various locations, 11 th Street and the Strand on the beach, Private Property, Hermosa Ave and Herondo Street on the beach. March 2 Longfellow Ave. and the Strand on the Beach and 32 nd Place/33 rd Street and the Strand on the beach April 0 May 0 June 0 July 0 August 0 September 0 October 0 November 1 Moondust Parkette and Private Residence December 1 Pier Plaza and the Pier Total 9 In 2020,Community Resources and the Los Angeles County Fire Department processed 9 film permits, which is 30 less permits than were processed in 2019. McCormick Ambulance: McCormick Ambulance conducted 706 transports and were canceled 526 times during 2020. In 2019, McCormick Ambulance completed 873 transports and were cancelled 464 times. McCormick responded to 167 less calls for service and cancelled 62 more times in 2020 than in 2019. Table 4: McCormick Ambulance Quarterly Transports Month Number of Completed Transports Number of Cancelled Transports January – June 2020 371 248 July – December 2020 335 2 78 Total 706 526 General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: Governance Element City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 5 of 6 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0036 Goal 1. A high degree of transparency and integrity in the decision-making process. Policies: ·1.6 Long-term considerations.Prioritize decisions that provide long-term community benefit and discourage decisions that provide short-term community benefit but reduce long-term opportunities. Safety Element Goal 5. High quality police and fire protection services provided to the residents and visitors. Policies: ·5.1 High level of response.Achieve optimal utilization of allocated public safety resources and provide desired levels of response and protection within the community. ·5.4 Adequate emergency access.Require new development to be designed to provide adequate emergency access and to maintain current levels of emergency services. Fiscal Impact: Funding for fire and ambulance services is included in the annual City budget. Attachments: 1.2020 RCC Transfer of Calls 2.2020 LA County Fire call transfers 3.4th Quarter Hermosa Beach Response 4.2020 Los Angeles County Fire Incidents and McCormick transports Annual Report 5.2020 Automatic Aid 6.2020 Community Engagement Photos 7.2020 Annual Film Permits Respectfully Submitted by: Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator Concur: Scott Hale, Los Angeles County Fire Department, Assistant Fire Chief of Division I Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 6 of 6 powered by Legistar™ Name: Date: 2020 Annual Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City ALI Class Answer Secs Transfer Secs (S-T)Transfer Secs (A-T)CallTypeID Transferred Transfer Number 01/01/2020 02:07:19 HERM BCH WPH2 4 42 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/01/2020 05:06:37 HERM BCH WPH2 2 33 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/01/2020 20:24:56 HERM BCH W911 3 175 172 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/02/2020 01:04:42 HERM BCH W911 4 41 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/02/2020 17:57:47 HERM BCH WPH2 7 48 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/04/2020 21:11:10 HERM BCH W911 7 68 61 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/05/2020 00:08:12 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 55 52 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/05/2020 01:48:36 HMB W911 4 113 109 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/05/2020 16:19:21 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 6 50 44 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/06/2020 02:42:08 HERM BCH W911 2 37 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/06/2020 15:13:00 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 3 32 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/06/2020 17:34:47 HERM BCH WPH2 3 44 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/08/2020 09:32:45 HERM BCH WPH2 2 45 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/08/2020 16:04:51 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 47 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/09/2020 03:48:02 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 6 52 46 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/09/2020 21:18:17 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 49 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/10/2020 07:47:01 HERM BCH WPH2 3 91 88 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/10/2020 08:05:26 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 2 35 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/10/2020 14:12:45 HMB W911 2 86 84 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/10/2020 16:07:50 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 3 46 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/10/2020 17:39:34 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 2 48 46 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/10/2020 20:48:32 HERM BCH WPH2 1 34 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/11/2020 10:32:25 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 6 32 26 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/11/2020 14:23:57 HERM BCH WPH2 5 34 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/11/2020 14:24:04 HERM BCH WPH2 4 38 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/11/2020 14:24:11 HERM BCH WPH2 5 39 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/11/2020 21:13:22 HMB W911 5 41 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/12/2020 15:53:25 HERM BCH WPH2 5 88 83 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/13/2020 11:26:43 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 3 32 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/13/2020 17:48:09 HERM BCH WPH2 6 47 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/14/2020 12:33:12 HERM BCH WPH2 3 54 51 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/14/2020 18:17:08 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 2 53 51 911 Calls TRUE !*39 HERMOSA BEACH TRANSFERS TO LA COUNTY FIRE TOTAL CALLS TRANSFERRED: 780 Calls SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY JANUARY 2020 THROUGH DECEMBER 2020 Average Answer Time: 5 Seconds Average Answer to Transfer Time: 48 Seconds 01/15/2020 11:45:33 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 55 50 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/15/2020 13:05:58 HERM BCH WPH2 5 50 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/15/2020 18:29:41 HERM BCH WPH2 7 36 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/16/2020 07:55:12 HERM BCH W911 1 36 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/17/2020 06:40:16 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 3 37 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/17/2020 07:41:33 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 6 45 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/17/2020 19:59:54 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 38 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/18/2020 18:36:03 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 3 53 50 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/19/2020 06:36:38 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 2 47 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/19/2020 10:42:07 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 78 74 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/19/2020 16:43:25 HERM BCH WPH2 5 46 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/19/2020 22:19:49 HERM BCH WPH2 4 47 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/19/2020 23:05:35 HERM BCH WPH2 4 59 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/19/2020 23:06:25 HERM BCH WPH2 5 63 58 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/21/2020 17:08:01 HERM BCH WPH2 2 57 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/21/2020 18:30:28 HMB W911 4 40 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/22/2020 16:25:54 HERM BCH WPH2 3 52 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/22/2020 16:26:09 HERM BCH WPH2 6 40 34 911 Calls TRUE !*397*** 01/22/2020 17:31:31 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 51 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/23/2020 17:32:49 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 106 102 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/24/2020 12:11:01 HERM BCH W911 3 60 57 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/24/2020 12:44:18 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 31 26 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/25/2020 00:10:53 HERM BCH WPH2 5 52 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/25/2020 22:40:06 HERM BCH WPH2 4 37 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/27/2020 13:59:11 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 2 54 52 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/28/2020 19:53:14 HERM BCH WPH2 3 50 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/28/2020 22:21:10 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 3 61 58 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/29/2020 09:27:55 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 36 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/29/2020 15:19:39 HERM BCH WPH2 3 54 51 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/30/2020 07:03:48 HERM BCH WPH2 4 52 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 01/30/2020 21:05:04 HMB W911 7 74 67 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/01/2020 09:12:00 HMB W911 2 49 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/01/2020 19:02:05 HERM BCH WPH2 6 49 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/01/2020 19:02:33 HERM BCH WPH2 7 44 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/01/2020 19:06:33 HERM BCH WPH2 5 65 60 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/02/2020 12:58:56 HMB W911 3 37 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/02/2020 13:00:16 HERM BCH W911 3 35 32 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/02/2020 13:00:22 HERM BCH WPH2 3 48 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/02/2020 21:19:15 HMB W911 3 124 121 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/02/2020 22:30:12 HERM BCH W911 6 45 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/04/2020 09:23:44 HERM BCH W911 3 83 80 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/04/2020 18:04:26 HMB W911 6 35 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/04/2020 18:06:05 HERM BCH W911 11 44 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/05/2020 15:21:36 HERM BCH WPH2 2 52 50 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/07/2020 08:10:50 HMB W911 5 60 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/07/2020 08:11:15 HMB W911 6 27 21 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/07/2020 09:49:14 HERM BCH WPH2 3 51 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/08/2020 15:06:13 HERM BCH W911 4 34 30 911 Calls TRUE *!39 02/08/2020 16:14:41 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 6 22 16 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/09/2020 02:04:33 HERM BCH WPH2 4 47 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/09/2020 08:04:02 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 32 27 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/09/2020 11:58:56 HERM BCH W911 12 45 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/09/2020 18:02:55 HERM BCH W911 10 36 26 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/10/2020 06:39:59 HERM BCH WPH2 3 63 60 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/10/2020 16:42:37 HMB W911 2 65 63 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/10/2020 16:49:02 HERM BCH WPH2 3 63 60 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/10/2020 18:57:58 HMB W911 6 55 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/11/2020 08:19:56 HERM BCH WPH2 3 95 92 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/11/2020 15:22:55 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 8 32 24 911 Calls TRUE !*392 02/11/2020 22:03:52 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 59 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/11/2020 22:17:37 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 7 51 44 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/11/2020 23:18:19 HMB W911 4 68 64 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/12/2020 22:59:52 HMB W911 6 75 69 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/13/2020 08:52:59 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 33 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/13/2020 13:52:13 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 60 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/13/2020 21:40:14 HERMOSA BEACH CNTX 4 50 46 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/14/2020 20:43:31 HERM BCH W911 6 56 50 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/15/2020 09:08:35 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 37 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/16/2020 00:13:10 HMB W911 4 16 12 911 Calls TRUE 5!*39 02/16/2020 05:24:41 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 37 32 911 Calls TRUE !*391 02/16/2020 05:40:43 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 33 28 911 Calls TRUE !*399 02/16/2020 10:32:36 HERM BCH W911 5 31 26 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/17/2020 00:53:13 HERM BCH WPH2 3 28 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/18/2020 04:09:02 HMB W911 6 63 57 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/18/2020 12:54:18 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 36 32 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/19/2020 08:06:51 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 48 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/19/2020 09:15:17 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 3 45 42 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/19/2020 10:02:15 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 51 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/19/2020 20:36:14 HERM BCH WPH2 4 52 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/20/2020 07:22:14 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 35 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/20/2020 18:43:39 HERM BCH WPH2 7 14 7 911 Calls TRUE 5!*392 02/21/2020 09:46:38 HERM BCH WPH2 6 41 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/21/2020 11:19:13 HERM BCH VOIP 4 37 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/22/2020 10:00:17 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 6 40 34 911 Calls TRUE !*392 02/22/2020 10:01:51 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 3 34 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/22/2020 12:44:17 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 29 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/22/2020 20:23:44 HMB W911 5 29 24 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/23/2020 03:43:03 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 6 41 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/23/2020 22:10:22 HMB W911 14 47 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/24/2020 06:11:51 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 7 115 108 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/24/2020 17:37:59 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 3 46 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/25/2020 13:41:40 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 2 43 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/25/2020 19:47:40 HMB W911 8 41 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/25/2020 22:41:42 HMB W911 4 43 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/25/2020 22:42:01 HMB W911 4 59 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/26/2020 08:25:19 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 3 51 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/26/2020 16:29:51 HMB W911 3 38 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/26/2020 16:30:18 HERM BCH WPH2 2 63 61 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/26/2020 19:55:14 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 7 37 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/27/2020 04:37:31 HMB W911 4 51 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/27/2020 08:16:53 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 65 60 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/27/2020 14:10:48 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 26 22 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/27/2020 19:28:30 HERM BCH WPH2 12 69 57 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/27/2020 20:03:27 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 11 63 52 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/28/2020 02:45:31 HMB W911 2 108 106 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/28/2020 13:50:40 HERM BCH WPH2 3 65 62 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/28/2020 18:01:58 HMB W911 3 41 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/29/2020 07:28:44 HMB W911 5 44 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/29/2020 07:28:47 HERM BCH W911 3 28 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/29/2020 08:56:33 HERM BCH W911 3 36 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/29/2020 12:58:27 HMB W911 6 61 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/29/2020 13:04:36 HMB W911 3 71 68 911 Calls TRUE !*39 02/29/2020 21:52:13 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 20 15 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/01/2020 08:38:41 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 42 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/01/2020 09:24:51 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 32 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/01/2020 17:18:15 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 2 28 26 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/02/2020 00:45:42 HERM BCH WPH2 4 65 61 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/02/2020 01:30:36 HMB W911 6 24 18 911 Calls TRUE 39!*91553 03/02/2020 06:46:12 HERM BCH WPH2 2 89 87 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/02/2020 18:29:37 HERM BCH WPH2 5 43 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/02/2020 20:21:51 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 3 97 94 911 Calls TRUE !*399 03/02/2020 20:25:40 HERM BCH WPH2 5 23 18 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/02/2020 23:02:15 HERMOSA BEACH W911 3 70 67 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/03/2020 20:05:54 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 25 20 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/03/2020 21:23:19 HERM BCH WPH2 3 81 78 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/03/2020 22:33:59 HMB W911 2 49 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/04/2020 20:20:29 HERM BCH WPH2 6 53 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/05/2020 14:31:44 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 46 42 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/05/2020 16:00:15 HMB W911 8 28 20 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/08/2020 03:28:32 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 45 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/08/2020 03:35:09 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 33 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/08/2020 17:35:47 HMB W911 6 42 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/08/2020 20:53:43 HERM BCH WPH2 4 44 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/09/2020 09:29:13 HERM BCH W911 2 58 56 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/09/2020 12:14:21 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 7 56 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/09/2020 12:17:01 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 6 22 16 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/09/2020 12:20:52 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 16 11 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/10/2020 01:17:54 HERM BCH WPH2 3 52 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/13/2020 22:18:55 HMB W911 8 57 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/14/2020 05:56:05 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 58 53 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/15/2020 03:50:36 HERM BCH WPH2 6 69 63 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/16/2020 08:02:28 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 2 49 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/16/2020 09:21:07 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 3 37 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/16/2020 12:50:28 HMB W911 7 36 29 911 Calls TRUE 4!*39 03/16/2020 15:18:24 HERM BCH WPH2 58 129 71 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/16/2020 17:19:48 HERM BCH WPH2 5 49 44 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/16/2020 17:33:57 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 6 49 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/17/2020 02:41:25 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 39 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/17/2020 08:42:24 HERM BCH WPH2 3 58 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/17/2020 12:46:07 HMB W911 3 39 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/17/2020 13:47:10 HERM BCH WPH2 4 48 44 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/17/2020 13:47:19 HERM BCH WPH2 3 61 58 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/17/2020 13:47:23 HMB W911 2 40 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/17/2020 19:32:23 HERM BCH WPH2 6 48 42 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/17/2020 21:49:58 HERMOSA BEACH CNTX 2 42 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/18/2020 08:34:40 HMB WPH2 1 39 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/18/2020 19:56:53 HMB W911 5 43 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/18/2020 20:25:54 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 33 29 911 Calls TRUE !*393 03/19/2020 09:23:36 HMB W911 6 34 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/19/2020 11:27:30 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 19 68 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/19/2020 16:08:34 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 24 19 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/19/2020 16:52:08 HERM BCH W911 3 30 27 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/20/2020 06:22:23 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 4 43 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/20/2020 14:11:27 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 24 63 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/20/2020 19:35:09 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 13 32 19 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/20/2020 19:45:05 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 6 7 1 911 Calls TRUE #!*39 03/21/2020 10:40:11 HMB W911 4 61 57 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/21/2020 14:17:56 HERM BCH WPH2 5 45 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/22/2020 10:53:40 HERM BCH WPH2 5 45 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/23/2020 21:04:11 HERM BCH W911 5 40 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/24/2020 15:52:38 HERM BCH W911 3 24 21 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/24/2020 16:57:24 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 37 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/24/2020 23:31:56 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 3 122 119 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/25/2020 13:37:31 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 4 37 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39!*39 03/25/2020 14:20:54 HERM BCH W911 7 32 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/26/2020 12:11:22 HERM BCH WPH2 6 37 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/26/2020 12:17:59 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 36 32 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/27/2020 00:01:56 HMB W911 6 37 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/27/2020 00:58:53 HMB W911 6 45 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/28/2020 12:41:08 HERM BCH WPH2 6 66 60 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/29/2020 21:19:12 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 4 90 86 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/31/2020 10:22:16 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 7 37 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 03/31/2020 11:09:49 HERM BCH WPH2 5 62 57 911 Calls TRUE !*3944 04/03/2020 11:08:34 HERM BCH WPH2 4 46 42 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/03/2020 19:00:01 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 8 31 23 911 Calls TRUE !*392 04/04/2020 11:31:01 HERM BCH WPH2 4 57 53 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/04/2020 11:39:18 HERM BCH W911 4 43 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/05/2020 02:53:11 HERM BCH W911 3 94 91 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/05/2020 13:29:12 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 32 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/05/2020 13:50:26 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 43 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/05/2020 21:32:41 HERM BCH WPH2 5 55 50 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/06/2020 01:39:40 HERM BCH WPH2 5 30 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/06/2020 19:05:43 HERM BCH W911 4 37 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/08/2020 14:19:45 HMB W911 3 18 15 911 Calls TRUE 12!*39 04/08/2020 14:25:51 HMB W911 5 48 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39* 04/09/2020 03:37:37 HMB W911 2 55 53 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/09/2020 15:30:01 HERM BCH WPH2 8 62 54 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/09/2020 15:34:07 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 42 38 911 Calls TRUE 2!*39 04/09/2020 15:47:37 HMB W911 7 73 66 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/09/2020 15:47:45 HERM BCH WPH2 4 56 52 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/09/2020 22:05:52 HERM BCH W911 4 85 81 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/12/2020 12:33:11 HERM BCH WPH2 6 9 3 911 Calls TRUE 5!*39 04/12/2020 13:33:34 HERM BCH W911 2 44 42 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/12/2020 16:22:14 HERM BCH WPH2 5 54 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/12/2020 23:09:04 HMB W911 4 61 57 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/13/2020 02:08:28 HERM BCH WPH2 5 50 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/13/2020 16:03:43 HERM BCH WPH2 7 55 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/13/2020 19:19:11 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 45 40 911 Calls TRUE !*391 04/15/2020 13:47:25 HERM BCH WPH2 3 55 52 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/18/2020 20:02:20 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 4 61 57 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/18/2020 23:23:46 HMB WPH2 5 74 69 911 Calls TRUE !*39!*39!39 04/19/2020 07:23:00 HERM BCH W911 5 65 60 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/19/2020 08:25:26 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 81 77 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/21/2020 17:39:37 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 45 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/21/2020 18:01:00 HERM BCH WPH2 4 35 31 911 Calls TRUE !*391 04/22/2020 16:12:51 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 38 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/23/2020 03:02:46 HMB W911 4 77 73 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/23/2020 09:02:05 HERM BCH W911 4 27 23 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/23/2020 20:06:01 HERM BCH WPH2 3 24 21 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/24/2020 05:07:26 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 3 67 64 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/24/2020 06:58:32 HERM BCH WPH2 3 49 46 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/25/2020 10:14:16 HMB W911 4 40 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/25/2020 12:04:49 HERM BCH WPH2 5 75 70 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/25/2020 12:04:56 HMB W911 2 53 51 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/26/2020 02:17:32 HERM BCH WPH2 7 26 19 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/26/2020 08:17:45 HMB W911 6 49 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/26/2020 10:34:15 HERM BCH W911 4 33 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/27/2020 00:15:46 HMB W911 3 120 117 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/27/2020 04:29:44 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 3 64 61 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/27/2020 16:08:19 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 30 26 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/28/2020 09:10:05 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 6 72 66 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/29/2020 04:32:40 HERM BCH WPH2 4 109 105 911 Calls TRUE !*39 04/29/2020 05:14:12 HERM BCH W911 5 34 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/02/2020 02:50:06 HMB W911 6 137 131 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/02/2020 18:21:15 HERM BCH WPH2 6 68 62 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/02/2020 21:29:29 HMB W911 5 45 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/04/2020 17:34:45 HMB W911 3 41 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/04/2020 17:55:13 HERM BCH WPH2 6 51 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/08/2020 10:44:23 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 31 26 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/08/2020 18:45:23 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 41 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/08/2020 20:56:17 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 9 73 64 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/08/2020 20:56:20 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 6 53 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/08/2020 20:56:32 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 10 56 46 911 Calls TRUE 1!*39 05/08/2020 20:57:40 HMB W911 15 49 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/08/2020 21:17:56 HMB W911 4 74 70 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/09/2020 13:25:15 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 35 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/09/2020 13:52:49 HERM BCH W911 9 48 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/09/2020 15:25:03 HMB W911 5 41 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/10/2020 05:31:10 HERM BCH WPH2 5 93 88 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/10/2020 06:09:11 HERM BCH WPH2 5 60 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/10/2020 18:36:39 HMB W911 4 42 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/11/2020 11:36:12 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 6 41 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/11/2020 19:37:55 HERM BCH WPH2 6 46 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/12/2020 01:38:38 HERM BCH WPH2 4 40 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/13/2020 09:23:09 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 53 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/13/2020 10:40:29 HERM BCH WPH2 3 8 5 911 Calls TRUE 1!*39 05/14/2020 03:44:35 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 54 50 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/14/2020 12:33:00 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 6 66 60 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/15/2020 15:04:08 HERMOSA BEACH W911 4 39 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/16/2020 09:30:31 HERM BCH WPH2 4 144 140 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/16/2020 12:49:27 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 18 14 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/16/2020 13:51:40 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 3 38 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/16/2020 17:15:04 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 7 35 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/16/2020 22:06:11 HERM BCH W911 6 72 66 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/17/2020 10:00:23 HERM BCH W911 6 117 111 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/17/2020 12:36:11 HMB W911 4 29 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/17/2020 22:00:38 HERM BCH W911 4 74 70 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/17/2020 22:02:46 HERM BCH WPH2 7 66 59 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/17/2020 22:03:07 HMB W911 6 71 65 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/17/2020 22:22:42 HERM BCH WPH2 7 68 61 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/18/2020 18:38:52 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 7 35 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/19/2020 10:52:07 HERM BCH W911 3 87 84 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/19/2020 18:53:08 HERM BCH WPH2 4 7 3 911 Calls TRUE 7!*39 05/19/2020 18:57:52 HERM BCH WPH2 10 62 52 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/20/2020 07:21:55 HMB WPH2 4 38 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/20/2020 13:50:24 HMB W911 5 42 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/21/2020 06:05:07 HERM BCH WPH2 6 61 55 911 Calls TRUE !*395 05/21/2020 12:34:43 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 36 32 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/21/2020 13:51:02 HERM BCH WPH2 2 95 93 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/21/2020 14:22:40 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 38 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/22/2020 15:46:52 HMB W911 7 61 54 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/22/2020 18:26:23 HERM BCH W911 4 155 151 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/26/2020 09:33:21 HMB W911 2 31 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/26/2020 14:47:23 HERM BCH W911 3 44 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/26/2020 23:20:44 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 2 27 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/27/2020 23:42:03 HERM BCH W911 4 74 70 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/28/2020 07:19:26 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 9 42 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/28/2020 14:52:56 HERM BCH WPH2 3 31 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/28/2020 20:53:21 HMB W911 5 73 68 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/29/2020 04:23:22 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 64 59 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/29/2020 16:32:47 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 7 31 24 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/29/2020 18:24:09 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 9 75 66 911 Calls TRUE !*397 05/29/2020 20:14:13 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 34 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/30/2020 14:43:44 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 34 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/30/2020 14:49:43 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 25 20 911 Calls TRUE !*39 05/30/2020 15:30:13 HERM BCH WPH2 6 23 17 911 Calls TRUE 5!*39 05/31/2020 11:59:14 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 4 42 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/01/2020 12:28:05 HERM BCH WPH2 4 97 93 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/02/2020 09:05:35 HMB W911 6 52 46 911 Calls TRUE 2!*39 06/02/2020 09:56:57 HERM BCH W911 2 22 20 911 Calls TRUE !*39* 06/03/2020 11:08:05 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 6 29 23 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/04/2020 01:33:07 HERM BCH W911 6 47 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/05/2020 06:11:56 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 54 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/06/2020 07:27:19 HERM BCH WPH2 5 36 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/08/2020 11:27:54 HERM BCH WPH2 3 57 54 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/08/2020 14:54:45 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 34 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/09/2020 10:50:50 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 21 16 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/09/2020 14:59:41 HERM BCH W911 6 180 174 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/10/2020 13:06:59 HERM BCH W911 6 53 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/10/2020 19:27:55 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 51 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/10/2020 23:55:38 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 6 37 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/11/2020 17:17:41 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 8 26 18 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/11/2020 19:49:46 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 7 163 156 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/12/2020 04:13:44 HERM BCH W911 4 95 91 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/12/2020 04:58:07 HERM BCH W911 3 62 59 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/12/2020 18:24:43 HERM BCH WPH2 6 50 44 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/12/2020 19:20:42 HMB W911 5 77 72 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/13/2020 19:39:56 HERM BCH W911 3 62 59 911 Calls TRUE !*393 06/13/2020 20:39:02 HERM BCH W911 8 45 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/14/2020 10:48:07 HERM BCH W911 4 40 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/14/2020 14:04:22 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 44 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/14/2020 14:24:59 HERM BCH WPH2 4 23 19 911 Calls TRUE #!*39 06/14/2020 16:44:24 HERM BCH W911 3 56 53 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/15/2020 01:27:43 HERM BCH WPH2 7 64 57 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/15/2020 20:24:11 HMB W911 3 59 56 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/16/2020 22:28:49 HERM BCH W911 2 53 51 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/18/2020 09:37:57 HMB W911 3 47 44 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/19/2020 09:48:35 HERM BCH WPH2 4 42 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/19/2020 09:48:39 HMB W911 3 32 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/19/2020 09:49:22 HMB WPH2 3 16 13 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/19/2020 21:30:55 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 31 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/20/2020 09:14:24 HERM BCH W911 3 120 117 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/20/2020 11:47:30 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 46 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/21/2020 20:29:46 HERM BCH W911 6 74 68 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/22/2020 01:44:36 HERM BCH W911 6 51 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/23/2020 07:59:10 HMB W911 4 28 24 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/23/2020 18:16:51 HERM BCH WPH2 6 44 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/24/2020 14:42:55 HMB W911 5 43 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/25/2020 18:14:50 HERM BCH WPH2 7 43 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/26/2020 08:10:07 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 21 16 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/26/2020 08:15:26 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 17 12 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/26/2020 22:38:13 HERM BCH WPH2 4 181 177 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/27/2020 00:00:13 HERM BCH WPH2 13 43 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/27/2020 00:21:50 HERM BCH W911 5 102 97 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/27/2020 00:26:38 HERM BCH WPH2 4 133 129 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/27/2020 01:13:02 HERM BCH WPH2 3 29 26 911 Calls TRUE 64!*39 06/27/2020 06:55:41 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 3 40 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/27/2020 17:17:18 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 3 76 73 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/27/2020 18:50:11 HERM BCH W911 12 57 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/28/2020 04:39:58 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 40 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/28/2020 10:44:45 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 33 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/28/2020 10:48:08 HMB W911 3 81 78 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/28/2020 17:07:48 HERM BCH W911 6 44 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 06/29/2020 08:11:51 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 8 56 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/01/2020 04:08:24 HERM BCH WPH2 5 102 97 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/02/2020 08:43:24 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 6 32 26 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/04/2020 17:33:08 HERM BCH WPH2 5 23 18 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/04/2020 21:20:15 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 3 43 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/05/2020 15:45:38 HMB W911 6 39 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/05/2020 20:38:41 HERM BCH WPH2 2 63 61 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/06/2020 06:47:59 HERM BCH W911 5 48 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/07/2020 00:07:36 HERM BCH W911 4 89 85 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/07/2020 14:38:20 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 12 30 18 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/07/2020 15:13:26 HERMOSA BEACH W911 7 55 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/08/2020 19:19:31 HMB W911 3 81 78 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/09/2020 15:01:23 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 24 20 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/10/2020 12:54:16 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 41 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/10/2020 14:23:11 HERM BCH WPH2 2 29 27 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/10/2020 19:53:35 HMB W911 3 85 82 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/11/2020 05:47:11 HMB W911 6 42 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/12/2020 09:03:36 HERM BCH WPH2 4 56 52 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/12/2020 13:14:10 HERM BCH WPH2 2 24 22 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/12/2020 13:17:29 HERM BCH W911 6 28 22 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/12/2020 18:04:10 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 41 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/12/2020 18:58:47 HMB W911 3 78 75 911 Calls TRUE 1!*39 07/13/2020 00:38:54 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 7 46 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/14/2020 16:44:05 HERM BCH W911 4 72 68 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/14/2020 20:53:48 HERM BCH W911 13 57 44 911 Calls TRUE !*391 07/15/2020 18:36:06 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 10 94 84 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/17/2020 08:38:45 HERM BCH W911 5 26 21 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/17/2020 18:49:21 HMB W911 7 41 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/17/2020 18:49:31 HMB W911 4 61 57 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/18/2020 00:05:40 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 33 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/18/2020 23:00:15 HERM BCH WPH2 3 44 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/18/2020 23:01:00 HMB W911 5 37 32 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/18/2020 23:33:26 HERM BCH WPH2 3 65 62 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/19/2020 00:35:47 HMB W911 5 44 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/19/2020 21:13:25 HERM BCH WPH2 3 49 46 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/20/2020 18:07:52 HERM BCH W911 8 34 26 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/20/2020 18:46:25 HERM BCH WPH2 3 38 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39# 07/21/2020 12:25:35 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 86 83 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/21/2020 16:54:28 HERM BCH WPH2 4 51 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/21/2020 21:27:45 HMB W911 4 57 53 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/22/2020 12:32:53 HERM BCH W911 3 107 104 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/23/2020 07:41:15 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 6 28 22 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/23/2020 19:33:41 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 6 33 27 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/23/2020 20:26:58 HERM BCH W911 5 309 304 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/23/2020 22:18:01 HERM BCH WPH2 3 36 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/23/2020 22:22:58 HERMOSA BEACH W911 3 13 10 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/24/2020 07:46:48 HERM BCH W911 2 50 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/24/2020 12:42:45 HERM BCH W911 5 38 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/24/2020 20:25:50 HMB WPH2 4 56 52 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/27/2020 11:47:53 HERM BCH WPH2 6 53 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/27/2020 11:48:19 HERM BCH WPH2 15 58 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/27/2020 17:19:35 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 6 22 16 911 Calls TRUE !*3913021796 07/27/2020 23:29:31 HMB W911 10 89 79 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/28/2020 18:36:23 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 4 54 50 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/29/2020 06:37:30 HERM BCH W911 6 98 92 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/29/2020 22:11:25 HERM BCH WPH2 4 41 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/30/2020 14:19:41 HERM BCH WPH2 15 101 86 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/30/2020 22:52:02 HERM BCH W911 4 95 91 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/31/2020 00:45:38 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 7 63 56 911 Calls TRUE !*39 07/31/2020 03:30:23 HERMOSA BEACH W911 4 35 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/01/2020 08:53:08 HERM BCH WPH2 3 52 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/01/2020 15:12:34 HMB W911 12 204 192 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/02/2020 18:11:58 HERM BCH WPH2 6 77 71 911 Calls TRUE 7!*39 08/02/2020 20:01:33 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 47 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/03/2020 01:08:35 HERM BCH WPH2 3 69 66 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/03/2020 09:47:56 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 12 36 24 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/03/2020 11:55:45 HERM BCH WPH2 6 39 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/03/2020 12:15:56 HMB W911 2 59 57 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/03/2020 15:03:21 HMB W911 6 66 60 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/03/2020 16:16:34 HMB W911 8 25 17 911 Calls TRUE 2!*39 08/03/2020 16:57:41 HERM BCH WPH2 6 54 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/03/2020 17:47:01 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 43 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/03/2020 23:31:23 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 50 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/04/2020 11:40:31 HERMOSA BEACH W911 5 35 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/04/2020 23:56:25 HERM BCH W911 6 34 28 911 Calls TRUE !*391 08/05/2020 12:28:58 HERM BCH WPH2 4 273 269 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/05/2020 17:52:18 HERMOSA BEACH W911 4 29 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/05/2020 19:03:16 HERM BCH WPH2 3 45 42 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/06/2020 08:46:12 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 141 138 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/06/2020 19:02:04 HERM BCH WPH2 3 71 68 911 Calls TRUE !*39518 08/07/2020 20:04:04 HERM BCH W911 4 71 67 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/08/2020 02:20:20 HMB W911 2 129 127 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/08/2020 08:27:42 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 9 62 53 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/08/2020 13:25:32 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 43 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/08/2020 15:05:12 HERM BCH WPH2 4 31 27 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/08/2020 21:05:30 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 4 47 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/09/2020 14:44:36 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 7 66 59 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/09/2020 15:55:13 HMB W911 6 20 14 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/09/2020 17:32:00 HMB W911 4 51 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/10/2020 04:32:37 HERM BCH WPH2 4 86 82 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/10/2020 10:17:17 HERM BCH W911 6 63 57 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/11/2020 09:46:10 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 7 60 53 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/12/2020 20:33:57 HERM BCH WPH2 3 73 70 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/12/2020 20:35:14 HERM BCH W911 5 79 74 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/12/2020 20:38:24 HERM BCH W911 5 64 59 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/12/2020 20:41:43 HMB W911 3 108 105 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/12/2020 22:18:31 HERM BCH WPH2 3 76 73 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/13/2020 01:45:11 HERM BCH WPH2 4 79 75 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/15/2020 10:49:51 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 11 78 67 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/15/2020 19:59:51 HMB W911 5 61 56 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/16/2020 00:48:14 HERM BCH WPH2 4 76 72 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/17/2020 05:18:23 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 33 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/17/2020 05:32:07 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 3 18 15 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/18/2020 18:12:36 HERM BCH W911 2 62 60 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/18/2020 18:47:08 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 37 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/18/2020 21:26:06 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 57 54 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/19/2020 14:16:21 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 49 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/20/2020 00:19:33 HERM BCH WPH2 5 53 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/20/2020 07:08:55 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 22 19 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/20/2020 08:47:42 HERM BCH WPH2 5 66 61 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/20/2020 13:27:22 HMB W911 6 46 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/20/2020 20:34:42 HERM BCH WPH2 3 69 66 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/21/2020 17:14:21 HERM BCH WPH2 3 38 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/22/2020 12:08:53 HMB W911 9 31 22 911 Calls TRUE !13103950084 08/22/2020 17:08:13 HERM BCH WPH2 7 86 79 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/23/2020 01:43:29 HMB W911 4 71 67 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/23/2020 14:04:21 HERM BCH WPH2 5 106 101 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/23/2020 15:04:01 HERM BCH WPH2 5 53 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/24/2020 22:39:51 HERM BCH W911 11 56 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/25/2020 16:29:28 HMB WPH2 7 51 44 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/25/2020 18:55:03 HERM BCH WPH2 8 53 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/26/2020 11:11:37 HERM BCH WPH2 10 58 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/26/2020 12:11:39 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 38 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39!*39!*39 08/26/2020 18:09:03 HERM BCH W911 5 94 89 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/26/2020 22:24:52 HERM BCH WPH2 16 71 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/27/2020 00:26:57 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 55 50 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/28/2020 16:06:29 HERM BCH W911 12 83 71 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/28/2020 21:54:10 HMB W911 4 40 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/28/2020 21:54:15 HERM BCH WPH2 4 34 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/28/2020 21:54:18 HMB W911 13 35 22 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/28/2020 21:54:22 HMB W911 15 44 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39*39!39!* 08/28/2020 21:54:23 HERM BCH WPH2 30 76 46 911 Calls TRUE !*39*39!39 08/29/2020 17:06:58 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 44 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/29/2020 19:06:17 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 87 82 911 Calls TRUE !*39 08/29/2020 19:59:23 HERM BCH W911 4 315 311 911 Calls TRUE !*39*215 08/30/2020 12:59:42 HMB W911 13 44 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/01/2020 11:08:13 HERM BCH WPH2 1 30 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/01/2020 11:24:17 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 6 38 32 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/01/2020 20:00:52 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 19 46 27 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/01/2020 22:40:46 HMB W911 2 44 42 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/03/2020 09:06:24 HERM BCH W911 4 98 94 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/03/2020 21:02:36 HERM BCH WPH2 0 35 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/03/2020 21:02:44 HMB W911 2 28 26 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/03/2020 21:03:05 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 9 24 15 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/04/2020 05:20:55 HERM BCH W911 6 51 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/04/2020 05:46:26 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 35 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/04/2020 12:43:29 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 8 43 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/04/2020 13:15:55 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 8 27 19 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/04/2020 13:30:20 HERM BCH W911 8 36 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/05/2020 08:48:37 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 9 39 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/05/2020 19:25:45 HERM BCH WPH2 3 41 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/05/2020 19:49:32 HMB WPH2 4 50 46 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/05/2020 19:49:57 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 7 34 27 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/06/2020 12:24:31 HERM BCH WPH2 7 101 94 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/06/2020 12:25:11 HERM BCH WPH2 5 56 51 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/06/2020 12:26:17 HERM BCH WPH2 2 20 18 911 Calls TRUE !*39!! 09/08/2020 14:31:41 HERM BCH W911 5 25 20 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/09/2020 08:37:38 HERM BCH WPH2 6 43 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/09/2020 16:43:04 HMB W911 15 47 32 911 Calls TRUE !*11!*11!*39 09/09/2020 20:14:00 HMB W911 5 65 60 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/09/2020 20:14:36 HERM BCH WPH2 5 50 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/10/2020 11:02:10 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 6 35 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/10/2020 13:46:18 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 3 40 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/10/2020 18:10:15 HERM BCH VOIP 8 53 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/12/2020 10:13:26 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 39 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/12/2020 12:58:09 HERM BCH WPH2 2 55 53 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/12/2020 14:21:32 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 167 164 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/12/2020 16:07:28 HERM BCH WPH2 2 43 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/12/2020 16:44:59 HMB W911 3 44 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/12/2020 19:25:37 HERM BCH WPH2 5 55 50 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/12/2020 19:33:44 HMB W911 5 54 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/13/2020 13:34:44 HERM BCH WPH2 4 40 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/14/2020 15:08:54 HERM BCH WPH2 3 53 50 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/14/2020 20:03:06 HERM BCH WPH2 9 49 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/17/2020 11:11:46 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 8 33 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/17/2020 14:26:56 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 39 34 911 Calls TRUE 6!*39 09/18/2020 23:34:29 HERM BCH WPH2 4 76 72 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/19/2020 03:47:02 HERM BCH WPH2 4 26 22 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/19/2020 16:09:11 HMB W911 4 73 69 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/20/2020 13:56:58 HERM BCH W911 4 33 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/21/2020 12:04:13 HERM BCH VOIP 7 25 18 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/21/2020 12:04:20 HERM BCH WPH2 1 21 20 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/21/2020 16:50:40 HERM BCH W911 3 51 48 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/22/2020 12:34:37 HERM BCH W911 6 44 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/23/2020 16:35:15 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 6 30 24 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/24/2020 10:13:48 HERM BCH WPH2 6 41 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/25/2020 01:15:16 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 44 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/25/2020 05:21:53 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 6 58 52 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/25/2020 19:38:30 HERM BCH WPH2 5 39 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/26/2020 15:13:02 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 4 56 52 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/26/2020 17:29:21 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 5 52 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/26/2020 18:18:45 HMB W911 5 31 26 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/26/2020 18:18:57 HERM BCH WPH2 5 46 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/26/2020 19:34:53 HERM BCH W911 3 176 173 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/27/2020 03:34:22 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 54 51 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/27/2020 15:57:59 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 48 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/27/2020 17:27:00 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 43 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/27/2020 23:05:52 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 77 72 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/28/2020 10:38:39 HERM BCH WPH2 4 48 44 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/29/2020 10:52:07 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 9 44 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/30/2020 12:24:34 HERM BCH WPH2 3 39 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 09/30/2020 16:21:56 HERM BCH WPH2 8 79 71 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/02/2020 09:04:59 HMB W911 5 40 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/02/2020 21:32:47 HERM BCH WPH2 15 46 31 911 Calls TRUE !*392 10/03/2020 10:07:16 HMB W911 4 40 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/03/2020 11:30:44 HMB W911 6 29 23 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/03/2020 11:32:22 HERM BCH W911 2 107 105 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/03/2020 22:44:51 HERM BCH W911 4 42 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/04/2020 15:30:45 HERM BCH W911 3 50 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/04/2020 20:26:29 HERM BCH WPH2 7 56 49 911 Calls TRUE !*391 10/04/2020 23:58:37 HERM BCH WPH2 3 48 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/05/2020 12:08:06 HERM BCH WPH2 7 38 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/05/2020 19:54:56 HERM BCH WPH2 5 45 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/06/2020 10:45:32 HERM BCH WPH2 8 77 69 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/06/2020 10:45:35 HMB W911 14 84 70 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/06/2020 10:46:10 HERM BCH WPH2 8 43 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39* 10/06/2020 11:43:21 HERM BCH WPH2 4 89 85 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/06/2020 13:34:56 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 2 38 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/07/2020 07:23:08 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 4 58 54 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/07/2020 12:13:13 HMB W911 10 68 58 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/07/2020 15:43:46 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 43 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/07/2020 18:06:52 HERM BCH WPH2 2 64 62 911 Calls TRUE 1!*3932 10/08/2020 09:29:29 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 29 26 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/08/2020 10:40:53 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 51 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/08/2020 22:23:46 HMB W911 5 24 19 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/09/2020 13:14:26 HERM BCH WPH2 13 64 51 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/10/2020 16:13:15 HERM BCH WPH2 6 19 13 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/11/2020 00:13:21 HERM BCH WPH2 5 77 72 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/11/2020 09:06:33 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 13 43 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/11/2020 10:08:10 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 40 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/12/2020 21:21:19 HERM BCH WPH2 3 79 76 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/14/2020 08:24:04 HERM BCH W911 6 44 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/14/2020 16:39:05 HERM BCH WPH2 6 71 65 911 Calls TRUE !13103950084 10/15/2020 07:34:53 HERM BCH WPH2 5 39 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/15/2020 10:49:25 HERM BCH WPH2 8 46 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/15/2020 14:36:52 HMB W911 5 45 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/15/2020 15:06:47 HMB W911 7 40 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/16/2020 13:02:48 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 1 47 46 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/18/2020 06:31:14 HERM BCH WPH2 6 73 67 911 Calls TRUE !*395 10/18/2020 09:16:27 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 34 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/18/2020 09:34:25 HERMOSA BEACH W911 4 54 50 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/18/2020 21:36:08 HERM BCH WPH2 3 41 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/23/2020 15:19:22 HERM BCH WPH2 12 49 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/23/2020 19:49:53 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 3 44 41 911 Calls TRUE !*391 10/23/2020 19:52:17 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 7 27 20 911 Calls TRUE !*391 10/23/2020 19:55:32 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 19 15 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/23/2020 22:49:15 HMB W911 2 72 70 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/24/2020 00:46:36 HMB W911 4 39 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/25/2020 09:00:34 HMB W911 5 79 74 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/25/2020 11:53:11 HMB W911 4 32 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/26/2020 13:16:14 HERM BCH WPH2 5 41 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/27/2020 13:26:11 HMB W911 5 27 22 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/28/2020 11:22:14 HERM BCH WPH2 7 49 42 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/28/2020 21:28:22 HMB W911 4 70 66 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/28/2020 22:09:27 HERM BCH W911 4 49 45 911 Calls TRUE !*395 10/29/2020 02:53:44 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 28 23 911 Calls TRUE !*39*39!391 10/29/2020 20:42:50 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 3 57 54 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/30/2020 15:28:59 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 31 27 911 Calls TRUE 1!*39 10/31/2020 01:43:06 HERM BCH W911 9 88 79 911 Calls TRUE !*39 10/31/2020 08:10:23 HERM BCH WPH2 7 63 56 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/01/2020 08:33:53 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 27 23 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/01/2020 13:08:02 HERM BCH WPH2 5 60 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/01/2020 17:27:07 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 44 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/01/2020 18:27:36 HMB W911 5 46 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/02/2020 15:23:04 HMB W911 9 58 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/02/2020 15:27:22 HMB W911 6 61 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/02/2020 16:25:08 HERM BCH WPH2 4 59 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39! 11/03/2020 07:13:04 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 28 23 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/03/2020 21:06:34 HMB W911 2 46 44 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/04/2020 05:41:48 HMB W911 3 36 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/04/2020 22:36:58 HERM BCH WPH2 3 146 143 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/05/2020 07:52:15 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 5 60 55 911 Calls TRUE 2968616!*392 11/05/2020 11:31:38 HERM BCH W911 4 32 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/05/2020 11:39:26 HERM BCH W911 10 32 22 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/06/2020 02:53:03 HERM BCH WPH2 3 78 75 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/06/2020 03:56:17 HERM BCH W911 3 80 77 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/06/2020 11:48:56 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 33 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/08/2020 15:41:32 HMB W911 5 35 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/08/2020 16:08:54 HERM BCH WPH2 4 84 80 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/09/2020 22:14:38 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 6 59 53 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/09/2020 22:41:25 HERM BCH WPH2 3 38 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/11/2020 07:41:31 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 37 32 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/12/2020 09:27:25 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 6 39 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/12/2020 17:30:52 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 37 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/13/2020 00:18:45 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 49 44 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/13/2020 05:56:27 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 5 45 40 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/13/2020 14:55:24 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 50 46 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/13/2020 21:04:08 HERM BCH WPH2 2 15 13 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/14/2020 14:30:46 HERM BCH WPH2 5 33 28 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/14/2020 16:11:35 HMB W911 4 86 82 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/14/2020 16:56:48 HERMOSA BEACH W911 4 59 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/15/2020 09:13:40 HERM BCH W911 3 56 53 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/15/2020 09:24:16 HERM BCH W911 4 47 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/15/2020 12:18:40 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 41 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/15/2020 13:26:04 HERMOSA BEACH WPH2 5 69 64 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/15/2020 16:24:02 HERM BCH WPH2 5 25 20 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/16/2020 07:28:23 HMB W911 6 41 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/16/2020 07:29:20 HERM BCH WPH2 6 39 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/16/2020 12:27:07 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 41 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/16/2020 13:23:08 HERM BCH WPH2 3 7 4 911 Calls TRUE 0!*39 11/17/2020 05:50:30 HMB W911 6 41 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/17/2020 17:30:01 HMB W911 4 102 98 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/18/2020 13:45:07 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 35 32 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/18/2020 17:58:38 HERM BCH WPH2 9 36 27 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/19/2020 03:59:39 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 30 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/19/2020 09:11:24 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 11 58 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/19/2020 18:57:17 HERM BCH WPH2 4 40 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/20/2020 13:36:24 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 3 39 36 911 Calls TRUE !*397 11/20/2020 18:05:23 HERM BCH WPH2 4 35 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/20/2020 18:08:09 HMB W911 4 146 142 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/20/2020 18:09:23 HERM BCH WPH2 2 13 11 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/21/2020 18:00:31 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 6 57 51 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/23/2020 17:47:27 HERM BCH VOIP 11 24 13 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/23/2020 18:56:20 HERM BCH WPH2 6 74 68 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/24/2020 07:35:51 HMB W911 3 32 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/24/2020 18:14:36 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 6 66 60 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/25/2020 10:38:42 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 35 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/25/2020 10:44:23 HERM BCH WPH2 4 42 38 911 Calls TRUE 5!*39! 11/25/2020 16:10:15 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 1 51 50 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/25/2020 18:57:13 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 45 41 911 Calls TRUE !*390 11/26/2020 14:11:26 HERM BCH WPH2 10 62 52 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/26/2020 23:01:40 HERM BCH WPH2 3 95 92 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/27/2020 06:04:11 HERM BCH W911 3 39 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/27/2020 12:00:50 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 26 21 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/27/2020 19:59:03 HERM BCH W911 4 62 58 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/28/2020 16:05:58 HMB W911 1 62 61 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/28/2020 16:07:01 HERM BCH WPH2 12 37 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/28/2020 19:33:29 HERM BCH WPH2 4 84 80 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/29/2020 12:10:01 HERM BCH WPH2 6 69 63 911 Calls TRUE !*39 11/29/2020 15:15:23 HMB W911 5 30 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/01/2020 15:09:03 HERM BCH WPH2 7 34 27 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/01/2020 20:12:30 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 6 51 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/02/2020 12:05:33 HERM BCH WPH2 5 32 27 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/02/2020 15:18:57 HERM BCH WPH2 4 95 91 911 Calls TRUE !12139288222 12/02/2020 16:19:35 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 41 36 911 Calls TRUE !*3949 12/02/2020 20:39:03 HERM BCH WPH2 5 34 29 911 Calls TRUE 1!*39 12/03/2020 06:22:48 HMB W911 3 62 59 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/03/2020 19:34:37 HERM BCH WPH2 6 60 54 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/03/2020 21:38:29 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 43 38 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/04/2020 13:33:30 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 3 32 29 911 Calls TRUE !*395*39 12/04/2020 15:56:26 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 7 66 59 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/04/2020 21:45:27 HMB W911 3 58 55 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/04/2020 21:47:24 HMB W911 5 49 44 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/05/2020 20:31:06 HERM BCH WPH2 11 17 6 911 Calls TRUE *!39 12/06/2020 14:27:42 HERM BCH W911 6 28 22 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/06/2020 15:16:48 HERM BCH WPH2 4 49 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/06/2020 15:18:11 HERM BCH WPH2 12 27 15 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/06/2020 18:28:08 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 6 27 21 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/07/2020 11:50:36 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 5 37 32 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/07/2020 12:13:49 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 7 32 25 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/07/2020 12:43:44 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 3 32 29 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/07/2020 16:31:06 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 6 30 24 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/08/2020 06:23:14 HERM BCH WPH2 4 27 23 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/08/2020 10:01:00 HERM BCH WPH2 11 58 47 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/08/2020 11:33:36 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 3 42 39 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/08/2020 16:55:22 HMB W911 6 42 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/09/2020 14:12:17 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 5 23 18 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/10/2020 12:56:46 HMB W911 4 53 49 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/11/2020 00:13:23 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 3 57 54 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/11/2020 15:57:28 HMB W911 5 47 42 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/12/2020 15:49:51 HMB W911 3 91 88 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/13/2020 12:33:19 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 3 38 35 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/13/2020 15:03:09 HERM BCH W911 12 55 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/13/2020 23:17:46 HERM BCH WPH2 5 46 41 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/14/2020 09:56:48 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 79 75 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/14/2020 20:04:02 HMB W911 5 88 83 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/14/2020 22:39:11 HMB W911 4 75 71 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/15/2020 15:46:06 HERM BCH WPH2 11 80 69 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/15/2020 15:52:37 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 4 38 34 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/16/2020 10:57:29 HMB W911 7 52 45 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/16/2020 13:30:09 HERM BCH WPH2 3 21 18 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/16/2020 14:52:05 HMB W911 6 36 30 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/17/2020 10:06:55 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 7 26 19 911 Calls TRUE !*39*39!39! 12/17/2020 10:25:46 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 7 38 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/17/2020 17:49:12 HERM BCH WPH2 3 66 63 911 Calls TRUE !*399 12/18/2020 11:03:31 HERM BCH WPH2 6 82 76 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/18/2020 14:59:20 HMB W911 1 25 24 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/18/2020 15:08:10 HMB W911 9 42 33 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/18/2020 16:20:12 HERMOSA BEACH BUSN 12 49 37 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/19/2020 02:27:31 HERMOSA BEACH RESD 4 67 63 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/19/2020 16:25:50 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 50 46 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/20/2020 23:21:06 HERM BCH WPH2 5 41 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/23/2020 16:25:17 HERM BCH WPH2 8 102 94 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/23/2020 19:23:40 HERM BCH WPH2 5 41 36 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/23/2020 20:55:54 HERM BCH WPH2 4 55 51 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/25/2020 07:42:24 HMB W911 6 37 31 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/25/2020 09:40:55 HMB W911 6 58 52 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/25/2020 16:26:36 HERM BCH WPH2 5 68 63 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/26/2020 02:07:51 HERM BCH WPH2 3 103 100 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/26/2020 09:41:15 HERM BCH WPH2 5 85 80 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/26/2020 12:06:26 HERMOSA BEACH VOIP 4 80 76 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/28/2020 19:18:33 HERM BCH WPH2 6 270 264 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/29/2020 21:56:25 HMB W911 4 68 64 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/30/2020 12:18:27 HERM BCH WPH2 4 47 43 911 Calls TRUE !*39 12/31/2020 17:53:11 HERM BCH WPH2 8 31 23 911 Calls TRUE !*39 5 SECONDS 48 SECONDS Ad Hoc Report: Name: Date: Description: Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 01/01/2020 02:08:08 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/01/2020 05:07:18 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/01/2020 20:27:58 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/02/2020 01:05:31 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/02/2020 17:58:43 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/02/2020 23:03:08 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/04/2020 21:12:26 HERM BCH 108 911 Calls WPH2 01/05/2020 00:09:15 HERMOSA BEACH 14 911 Calls RESD 01/05/2020 01:50:37 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/05/2020 16:20:19 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 01/06/2020 02:42:52 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/06/2020 15:13:39 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 01/06/2020 17:35:38 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/08/2020 09:33:37 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/08/2020 16:05:46 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 01/09/2020 03:49:02 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 01/09/2020 21:19:14 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 01/10/2020 07:48:39 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/10/2020 08:06:09 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 01/10/2020 14:14:19 HMB 12 911 Calls WPH2 01/10/2020 16:08:43 HERMOSA BEACH 3 911 Calls VOIP 01/10/2020 17:40:29 HERMOSA BEACH 12 911 Calls WPH2 01/10/2020 20:49:13 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/10/2020 20:56:09 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/11/2020 10:33:05 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 01/11/2020 14:24:39 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/11/2020 14:24:49 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/11/2020 14:24:57 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/11/2020 15:26:29 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/11/2020 21:14:10 HMB 12 911 Calls WPH2 01/12/2020 15:55:00 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/13/2020 11:27:22 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 01/13/2020 17:49:03 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/14/2020 12:34:13 HERM BCH 29 911 Calls WPH2 01/14/2020 18:18:09 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 01/15/2020 11:46:35 HERMOSA BEACH 3 911 Calls BUSN 01/15/2020 13:06:55 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/15/2020 18:30:24 HERM BCH 1 911 Calls WPH2 01/16/2020 07:55:55 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Hermosa Beach 2/1/2020 January 2020 Answer Times Los Angeles County Fire Updated 1/13/21 1 01/17/2020 06:41:00 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 01/17/2020 07:42:25 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 01/17/2020 20:00:40 HERMOSA BEACH 35 911 Calls RESD 01/18/2020 18:37:04 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 01/19/2020 06:37:33 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 01/19/2020 10:43:33 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 01/19/2020 16:44:18 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/19/2020 22:20:43 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/19/2020 23:06:41 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/19/2020 23:07:35 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/21/2020 17:09:06 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/21/2020 18:31:16 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/22/2020 16:26:53 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/22/2020 16:26:57 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/22/2020 17:32:30 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 01/23/2020 17:34:43 HERMOSA BEACH 1 911 Calls VOIP 01/24/2020 12:12:08 HERM BCH 4 911 Calls WPH2 01/24/2020 12:44:57 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 01/24/2020 17:09:52 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/25/2020 00:11:53 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/25/2020 22:40:51 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/27/2020 14:00:14 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 01/28/2020 19:54:12 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/28/2020 22:22:20 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 01/29/2020 09:28:40 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 01/29/2020 15:20:41 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/30/2020 07:04:48 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 01/30/2020 21:06:26 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 Average Answer Time (Seconds)5 Updated 1/13/21 2 Hermosa Beach 2/1/2020 January 2020 Answer Times Updated 1/13/21 3 Name: Date: Description: Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 2/1/2020 09:12:56 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/1/2020 19:03:02 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/1/2020 19:03:25 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/1/2020 19:07:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/2/2020 12:59:41 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/2/2020 13:00:58 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/2/2020 13:01:18 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/2/2020 21:21:27 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/2/2020 22:31:05 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/4/2020 09:25:15 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/4/2020 18:05:09 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/4/2020 18:06:56 HERM BCH 33 911 Calls WPH2 2/5/2020 15:22:36 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/7/2020 08:11:50 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/7/2020 08:11:57 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/7/2020 09:50:12 HERM BCH 1 911 Calls WPH2 2/8/2020 15:06:59 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/8/2020 16:15:10 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 2/9/2020 02:05:27 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/9/2020 08:04:42 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 2/9/2020 11:59:48 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/9/2020 12:02:29 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/9/2020 18:03:38 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/10/2020 06:41:09 HERM BCH 1 911 Calls WPH2 2/10/2020 16:43:49 HMB 18 911 Calls WPH2 2/10/2020 16:50:11 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/10/2020 18:58:59 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/11/2020 08:21:37 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/11/2020 15:23:34 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 2/11/2020 22:04:58 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 2/11/2020 22:18:35 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 2/11/2020 23:19:34 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/12/2020 10:49:20 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/12/2020 23:01:13 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/13/2020 08:53:39 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 2/13/2020 13:53:19 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 2/13/2020 21:41:11 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls CNTX 2/14/2020 12:12:11 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/14/2020 20:44:33 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/15/2020 09:09:17 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 2/16/2020 00:14:07 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 Hermosa Call 3/4/2020 February 2020 Answer Times Los Angeles County Fire Updated 1/13/21 4 2/16/2020 05:25:23 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 2/16/2020 05:41:22 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 2/16/2020 10:33:12 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/17/2020 00:53:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/18/2020 04:10:10 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/18/2020 12:54:59 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 2/19/2020 08:07:44 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 2/19/2020 09:16:07 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 2/19/2020 10:03:10 HERMOSA BEACH 13 911 Calls VOIP 2/19/2020 20:37:11 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/20/2020 07:22:54 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 2/20/2020 18:44:38 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/21/2020 08:05:24 H B 2 911 Calls VOIP 2/21/2020 09:47:23 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/21/2020 11:19:54 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls VOIP 2/21/2020 13:11:08 HERM BCH 15 911 Calls WPH2 2/22/2020 10:01:01 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/22/2020 10:02:30 HERMOSA BEACH 1 911 Calls WPH2 2/22/2020 12:44:51 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 2/23/2020 03:43:48 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 2/23/2020 22:11:12 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/24/2020 06:13:50 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 2/24/2020 17:38:53 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 2/25/2020 13:42:32 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 2/25/2020 19:48:29 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/25/2020 22:42:33 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/26/2020 08:26:19 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 2/26/2020 16:30:37 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/26/2020 16:31:29 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/26/2020 18:16:48 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/26/2020 19:55:59 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 2/27/2020 04:38:30 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/27/2020 08:18:05 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 2/27/2020 14:11:22 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 2/27/2020 14:23:55 HB 13 911 Calls WPH2 2/27/2020 19:29:47 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/27/2020 20:04:38 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 2/28/2020 02:47:27 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/28/2020 13:51:53 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/28/2020 18:02:47 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/29/2020 07:29:23 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/29/2020 07:29:36 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/29/2020 08:57:17 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/29/2020 12:59:36 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 2/29/2020 13:05:55 HMB 12 911 Calls W911 2/29/2020 21:52:42 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN Average Answer Time (Seconds)3 Updated 1/13/21 5 Ad Hoc Report: Name: Date: Description: Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 3/1/2020 08:39:32 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 3/1/2020 09:25:31 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 3/1/2020 17:18:52 HERMOSA BEACH 14 911 Calls RESD 3/2/2020 00:46:55 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/2/2020 01:31:25 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/2/2020 06:47:49 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/2/2020 18:30:28 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/2/2020 20:23:37 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 3/2/2020 20:26:10 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 3/2/2020 23:03:33 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/3/2020 20:06:26 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 3/3/2020 21:24:48 HERM BCH 32 911 Calls WPH2 3/3/2020 22:34:56 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/4/2020 20:21:30 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/5/2020 14:32:37 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 3/5/2020 16:00:51 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/6/2020 14:59:47 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/8/2020 03:29:25 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 3/8/2020 03:35:51 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 3/8/2020 17:36:37 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/8/2020 20:54:35 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/9/2020 09:30:19 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/9/2020 12:15:25 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 3/9/2020 12:17:31 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 3/9/2020 12:21:16 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 3/10/2020 01:18:54 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/10/2020 17:58:31 HERMOSA BEACH 18 911 Calls WPH2 3/13/2020 22:20:00 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/14/2020 05:57:12 HERMOSA BEACH 33 911 Calls BUSN 3/15/2020 03:51:53 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/15/2020 21:04:43 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/16/2020 08:03:26 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 3/16/2020 09:21:53 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 3/16/2020 12:51:32 HMB 9 911 Calls WPH2 3/16/2020 15:20:41 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/16/2020 17:20:45 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/16/2020 17:34:55 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 3/17/2020 02:42:12 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 3/17/2020 08:43:30 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Hermosa Call Answer Time 4/1/2020 March 2020 Answer Time Los Angeles County Fire Updated 1/13/21 6 3/17/2020 12:46:54 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/17/2020 13:48:06 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/17/2020 13:48:11 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/17/2020 13:48:28 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/17/2020 19:33:18 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/17/2020 21:50:49 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls CNTX 3/18/2020 08:35:27 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/18/2020 19:57:44 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/18/2020 20:26:35 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 3/19/2020 09:24:18 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/19/2020 11:28:46 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 3/19/2020 15:19:03 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/19/2020 16:09:06 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 3/19/2020 16:52:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/20/2020 06:23:14 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/20/2020 14:12:38 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 3/20/2020 19:35:49 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 3/20/2020 19:46:04 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 3/21/2020 10:41:20 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/21/2020 14:18:49 HERM BCH 20 911 Calls WPH2 3/22/2020 10:54:33 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/23/2020 16:13:27 HERM BCH 40 911 Calls WPH2 3/23/2020 21:04:59 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/24/2020 15:53:10 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/24/2020 16:58:09 HERMOSA BEACH 18 911 Calls BUSN 3/24/2020 23:34:06 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 3/25/2020 13:38:16 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/25/2020 14:21:34 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/26/2020 12:12:07 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/26/2020 12:18:43 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 3/27/2020 00:02:41 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/27/2020 00:59:46 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/28/2020 12:42:22 HERM BCH 1 911 Calls WPH2 3/29/2020 11:36:21 HERM BCH 113 911 Calls WPH2 3/29/2020 11:38:48 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 3/29/2020 21:20:50 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 3/31/2020 10:23:01 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 3/31/2020 11:10:59 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Average Answer Time (Seconds)6 Updated 1/13/21 7 Ad Hoc Report: Name: Date: Description: Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 4/3/2020 11:09:27 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/3/2020 19:00:40 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 4/4/2020 11:32:06 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/4/2020 11:40:09 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/5/2020 02:54:53 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/5/2020 13:29:52 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 4/5/2020 13:51:18 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 4/5/2020 21:33:43 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/6/2020 01:40:18 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/6/2020 19:06:28 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/8/2020 14:20:49 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/8/2020 14:26:47 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/9/2020 03:38:40 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/9/2020 15:31:11 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/9/2020 15:35:03 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 4/9/2020 15:48:49 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/9/2020 15:48:58 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/9/2020 22:07:24 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/12/2020 12:33:53 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/12/2020 13:34:26 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/12/2020 16:23:16 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/12/2020 21:56:04 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/12/2020 23:10:13 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/13/2020 02:09:26 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/13/2020 16:04:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/13/2020 19:20:05 HERMOSA BEACH 48 911 Calls BUSN 4/15/2020 13:48:28 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/18/2020 20:03:29 HERMOSA BEACH 23 911 Calls WPH2 4/18/2020 23:25:07 HMB 76 911 Calls WPH2 4/18/2020 23:26:30 HMB 32 911 Calls WPH2 4/18/2020 23:26:53 HMB 0 AdministrativeWPH2 4/19/2020 07:24:13 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/19/2020 08:26:56 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 4/21/2020 06:51:01 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/21/2020 17:40:30 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 4/21/2020 18:01:43 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/22/2020 16:13:37 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 4/23/2020 03:04:11 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/23/2020 09:02:38 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Hermosa Call Answer Time 5/1/2020 April 2020 Answer Time Los Angeles County Fire Updated 1/13/21 8 4/23/2020 09:02:40 HERM BCH 1 911 Calls WPH2 4/23/2020 20:06:33 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/24/2020 05:08:41 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 4/24/2020 06:59:29 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/25/2020 10:15:04 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/25/2020 12:05:56 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/25/2020 12:06:11 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/26/2020 08:18:42 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/26/2020 10:34:55 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/27/2020 00:17:54 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/27/2020 04:30:56 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 4/27/2020 16:08:58 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 4/28/2020 09:11:25 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 4/29/2020 04:34:37 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 4/29/2020 05:14:54 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Average Answer Time (Seconds)5 Updated 1/13/21 9 Ad Hoc Report: Name: Date: Description: Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 5/2/2020 02:52:31 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/2/2020 18:22:31 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/2/2020 21:30:21 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/3/2020 10:13:22 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/4/2020 17:35:34 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/4/2020 17:56:12 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/4/2020 21:33:15 H B 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/8/2020 10:45:03 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 5/8/2020 18:46:12 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 5/8/2020 20:57:20 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/8/2020 20:57:21 HMB 1 911 Calls WPH2 5/8/2020 20:57:38 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/8/2020 20:57:55 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/8/2020 20:58:36 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/8/2020 21:19:18 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/9/2020 13:25:59 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 5/9/2020 13:53:45 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/9/2020 15:25:52 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/10/2020 05:32:51 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/10/2020 06:10:18 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 5/10/2020 18:37:29 HMB 39 911 Calls WPH2 5/11/2020 11:37:01 HERMOSA BEACH 3 911 Calls BUSN 5/11/2020 19:38:49 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/12/2020 01:39:26 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/13/2020 09:24:11 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 5/13/2020 10:41:20 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/14/2020 03:45:38 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 5/14/2020 12:34:14 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 5/15/2020 15:04:55 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/16/2020 09:33:03 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/16/2020 12:49:53 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 5/16/2020 13:52:26 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/16/2020 17:15:47 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 5/16/2020 22:07:31 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/17/2020 10:02:28 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/17/2020 12:36:48 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/17/2020 22:02:00 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/17/2020 22:04:00 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/17/2020 22:04:26 HMB 19 911 Calls WPH2 Hermosa Call Answer Time 6/1/2020 May 2020 Los Angeles County Fire Updated 1/13/21 10 5/17/2020 22:23:58 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/18/2020 18:39:36 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 5/19/2020 10:53:42 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/19/2020 18:59:02 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/20/2020 13:51:14 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/21/2020 06:06:16 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/21/2020 12:35:27 HERMOSA BEACH 47 911 Calls BUSN 5/21/2020 13:52:45 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/21/2020 14:23:27 HERMOSA BEACH 17 911 Calls BUSN 5/21/2020 19:26:59 H B 3 911 Calls RESD 5/22/2020 08:06:28 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/22/2020 15:48:01 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/22/2020 18:29:06 HERM BCH 49 911 Calls WPH2 5/26/2020 09:34:00 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/26/2020 14:48:15 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/26/2020 23:21:19 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 5/27/2020 23:43:25 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/28/2020 07:20:16 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 5/28/2020 14:53:34 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 5/28/2020 20:54:42 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/29/2020 04:24:35 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 5/29/2020 16:33:26 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 5/29/2020 18:25:32 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 5/29/2020 20:14:56 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 5/30/2020 14:44:26 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 5/30/2020 14:50:17 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 5/30/2020 15:31:48 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/31/2020 12:00:04 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 5/31/2020 15:58:10 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 Average Answer Time (Seconds)4 Updated 1/13/21 11 Ad Hoc Report: Name: Date: Description: Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 6/1/2020 12:29:50 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/2/2020 09:07:22 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/2/2020 09:57:27 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 6/3/2020 11:08:43 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 6/4/2020 01:34:02 HERM BCH 18 911 Calls WPH2 6/5/2020 06:12:59 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 6/6/2020 07:28:03 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/8/2020 11:28:59 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/8/2020 14:55:28 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 6/9/2020 10:51:20 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 6/9/2020 15:02:48 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls W911 6/10/2020 13:08:00 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls W911 6/10/2020 13:38:22 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/10/2020 19:28:54 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 6/10/2020 23:56:23 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 6/11/2020 17:18:15 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 6/11/2020 19:52:37 HERMOSA BEACH 18 911 Calls WPH2 6/12/2020 04:15:27 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/12/2020 04:59:17 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/12/2020 18:25:41 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/12/2020 19:22:06 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/13/2020 19:41:06 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/13/2020 20:39:55 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/14/2020 14:05:15 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 6/14/2020 14:25:49 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/14/2020 16:45:27 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 6/15/2020 01:28:55 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/15/2020 20:25:17 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/16/2020 22:29:50 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/18/2020 09:38:52 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/19/2020 09:49:19 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/19/2020 09:49:25 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/19/2020 09:49:46 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/19/2020 16:17:08 HERM BCH 8 911 Calls WPH2 6/19/2020 21:31:35 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 6/20/2020 09:16:32 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/20/2020 11:48:25 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 6/21/2020 20:31:08 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 6/22/2020 01:45:35 HERM BCH 40 911 Calls WPH2 Hermosa Call Answer Time 7/1/2020 June 20202 Los Angeles County Fire Updated 1/13/21 12 6/22/2020 11:32:42 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/23/2020 07:59:46 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/23/2020 18:17:43 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/24/2020 14:43:45 HMB 24 911 Calls WPH2 6/25/2020 18:15:41 HERM BCH 6 911 Calls WPH2 6/26/2020 08:10:37 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 6/26/2020 08:15:51 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 6/26/2020 22:41:22 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/26/2020 23:31:48 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/27/2020 00:01:04 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/27/2020 00:23:40 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/27/2020 00:28:59 HERM BCH 7 911 Calls WPH2 6/27/2020 01:14:24 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 6/27/2020 06:56:30 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 6/27/2020 17:18:42 HERMOSA BEACH 21 911 Calls WPH2 6/27/2020 18:51:16 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/27/2020 19:22:25 HB 5 911 Calls WPH2 6/27/2020 20:53:13 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/28/2020 04:40:46 HERMOSA BEACH 17 911 Calls VOIP 6/28/2020 10:45:27 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 6/28/2020 10:49:37 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/28/2020 14:48:30 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/28/2020 17:08:40 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 6/29/2020 08:12:55 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP Average Answer Time (Seconds)5 Updated 1/13/21 13 Ad Hoc Report: Name: Date: Description: Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 7/1/2020 04:10:14 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/2/2020 08:44:04 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 7/4/2020 17:33:39 HERM BCH 32 911 Calls WPH2 7/4/2020 21:21:06 HERMOSA BEACH 22 911 Calls VOIP 7/5/2020 15:46:25 HMB 61 911 Calls WPH2 7/5/2020 20:39:52 HERM BCH 32 911 Calls WPH2 7/6/2020 06:48:55 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/7/2020 14:38:58 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 7/7/2020 15:14:28 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/8/2020 19:21:00 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/9/2020 15:01:56 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 7/10/2020 12:55:05 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 7/10/2020 14:23:48 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/10/2020 19:55:08 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/11/2020 05:48:01 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/12/2020 09:04:40 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/12/2020 11:41:44 HMB 22 911 Calls WPH2 7/12/2020 13:14:41 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/12/2020 13:15:01 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/12/2020 13:18:05 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls W911 7/12/2020 18:04:59 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 7/12/2020 19:01:34 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/13/2020 00:39:47 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 7/14/2020 16:45:25 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/14/2020 20:54:53 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/15/2020 18:37:49 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 7/17/2020 08:39:19 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/17/2020 18:50:10 HMB 17 911 Calls WPH2 7/17/2020 18:50:40 HMB 23 911 Calls WPH2 7/18/2020 00:06:22 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 7/18/2020 23:01:07 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/18/2020 23:01:44 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/18/2020 23:34:39 HERM BCH 5 911 Calls WPH2 7/19/2020 00:36:39 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/19/2020 21:14:22 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/20/2020 18:08:34 HERM BCH 25 911 Calls WPH2 7/20/2020 18:47:11 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/21/2020 12:27:09 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 7/21/2020 16:55:27 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Call Answer Time 8/1/2020 Hermosa Call Answer Time Report July 2020 Los Angeles County Fire Updated 1/13/21 14 7/21/2020 21:28:50 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/22/2020 12:34:48 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/23/2020 07:41:52 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 7/23/2020 19:34:22 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 7/23/2020 20:32:15 HERM BCH 5 911 Calls WPH2 7/23/2020 22:18:45 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 7/23/2020 22:23:18 HERMOSA BEACH 84 911 Calls WPH2 7/24/2020 07:47:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/24/2020 12:43:30 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/24/2020 20:26:54 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/27/2020 11:48:54 HERM BCH 10 911 Calls WPH2 7/27/2020 11:49:25 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/27/2020 17:20:39 HERMOSA BEACH 42 911 Calls BUSN 7/27/2020 23:31:08 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/28/2020 18:37:25 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/29/2020 06:39:16 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/29/2020 22:12:14 HERM BCH 34 911 Calls WPH2 7/30/2020 14:21:30 HERM BCH 47 911 Calls WPH2 7/30/2020 22:53:44 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 7/31/2020 00:46:49 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 7/31/2020 03:31:06 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls W911 Average Answer Time (Seconds)9 Updated 1/13/21 15 Ad Hoc Report: Name: Date: Description: Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 8/1/2020 08:54:08 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/1/2020 15:16:06 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/2/2020 18:13:35 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/2/2020 18:45:18 H B 2 911 Calls VOIP 8/2/2020 20:02:29 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 8/3/2020 01:09:52 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/3/2020 09:48:41 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 8/3/2020 11:56:32 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/3/2020 12:17:03 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/3/2020 15:04:35 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/3/2020 16:17:27 HMB 94 911 Calls WPH2 8/3/2020 16:58:43 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/3/2020 17:47:53 HERMOSA BEACH 143 911 Calls BUSN 8/3/2020 23:32:21 HERMOSA BEACH 24 911 Calls VOIP 8/4/2020 11:41:14 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/4/2020 23:57:07 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/5/2020 12:33:38 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/5/2020 17:52:55 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/5/2020 19:04:09 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/6/2020 08:48:42 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 8/6/2020 19:03:23 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 8/7/2020 20:05:23 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 8/8/2020 02:22:37 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/8/2020 08:28:53 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 8/8/2020 13:26:24 HERMOSA BEACH 21 911 Calls RESD 8/8/2020 15:05:51 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/8/2020 21:06:25 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/9/2020 14:45:50 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 8/9/2020 15:55:41 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/9/2020 17:32:59 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/10/2020 04:34:11 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/10/2020 10:18:28 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/11/2020 09:47:19 HERMOSA BEACH 20 911 Calls BUSN 8/12/2020 10:53:43 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/12/2020 20:35:18 HERM BCH 36 911 Calls WPH2 8/12/2020 20:36:41 HERM BCH 132 911 Calls WPH2 8/12/2020 20:39:36 HERM BCH 21 911 Calls WPH2 8/12/2020 20:43:38 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/12/2020 22:19:55 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Hermosa Call Answer Time 9/1/2020 August 2020 Los Angeles County Fire Updated 1/13/21 16 8/13/2020 01:46:38 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/13/2020 13:47:09 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/15/2020 10:51:18 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 8/15/2020 20:01:00 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/16/2020 00:49:37 HERM BCH 22 911 Calls WPH2 8/17/2020 05:19:04 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 8/17/2020 05:32:33 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 8/18/2020 18:13:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/18/2020 18:47:53 HERMOSA BEACH 17 911 Calls VOIP 8/18/2020 21:27:12 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 8/19/2020 14:17:19 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 8/20/2020 00:20:34 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 8/20/2020 07:09:25 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 8/20/2020 08:48:56 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/20/2020 13:28:16 HMB 99 911 Calls WPH2 8/20/2020 20:35:59 HERM BCH 22 911 Calls WPH2 8/21/2020 17:15:07 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/22/2020 17:09:47 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/23/2020 01:44:48 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/23/2020 14:06:15 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/23/2020 15:05:02 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/24/2020 22:40:55 HERM BCH 21 911 Calls WPH2 8/25/2020 16:30:27 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/25/2020 18:56:04 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/26/2020 11:12:43 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/26/2020 12:12:40 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 8/26/2020 12:12:52 HERMOSA BEACH 6 Administrative BUSN 8/26/2020 12:13:20 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 8/26/2020 18:10:45 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/26/2020 22:26:11 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/27/2020 00:27:59 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 8/28/2020 16:08:00 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/28/2020 21:54:57 HERM BCH 1 911 Calls WPH2 8/28/2020 21:54:58 HMB 17 911 Calls WPH2 8/28/2020 21:55:01 HMB 62 911 Calls WPH2 8/28/2020 21:56:16 HERM BCH 47 911 Calls WPH2 8/28/2020 21:57:43 HMB 0 Administrative WPH2 8/29/2020 17:07:51 HERMOSA BEACH 53 911 Calls BUSN 8/29/2020 19:07:53 HERMOSA BEACH 20 911 Calls RESD 8/29/2020 20:04:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 8/30/2020 13:00:34 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 Average Answer Time (Seconds)13 Updated 1/13/21 17 Ad Hoc Report: Name:Hermosa Call Answer Time Date:10/1/2020 Description:September 2020 Los Angeles County Fire Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 9/1/20 11:08:51 HERM BCH 10 911 Calls WPH2 9/1/20 11:25:03 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 9/1/20 20:01:46 HERMOSA BEACH 17 911 Calls BUSN 9/1/20 22:41:37 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/3/20 09:08:10 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/3/20 21:03:19 HERM BCH 62 911 Calls WPH2 9/3/20 21:03:20 HMB 31 911 Calls WPH2 9/3/20 21:03:37 HERMOSA BEACH 54 911 Calls WPH2 9/4/20 05:21:54 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/4/20 05:47:08 HERMOSA BEACH 3 911 Calls VOIP 9/4/20 07:18:34 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/4/20 12:31:43 HERMOSA BEACH 3 911 Calls WPH2 9/4/20 12:44:21 HERMOSA BEACH 19 911 Calls BUSN 9/4/20 13:16:31 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 9/4/20 13:31:04 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 9/5/20 08:49:25 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 9/5/20 19:26:34 HERM BCH 40 911 Calls WPH2 9/5/20 19:50:30 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/5/20 19:50:40 HERMOSA BEACH 18 911 Calls BUSN 9/6/20 12:26:15 HERM BCH 8 911 Calls WPH2 9/6/20 12:26:20 HERM BCH 62 911 Calls WPH2 9/8/20 14:32:14 HERM BCH 22 911 Calls W911 9/9/20 08:38:29 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/9/20 16:44:16 HMB 3 911 Calls WPH2 9/9/20 20:15:13 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/9/20 20:15:34 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/10/20 11:02:53 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 9/10/20 13:47:07 HERMOSA BEACH 17 911 Calls BUSN 9/10/20 18:11:16 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls VOIP 9/12/20 10:14:14 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 9/12/20 12:59:12 HERM BCH 4 911 Calls WPH2 9/12/20 14:24:27 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 9/12/20 16:08:19 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/12/20 16:45:51 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/12/20 19:26:40 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/12/20 19:34:45 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/13/20 13:35:32 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/14/20 15:09:55 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/14/20 20:04:03 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/17/20 11:12:28 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 9/17/20 14:28:01 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 9/18/20 19:13:16 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/18/20 23:35:53 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/19/20 03:47:36 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 9/19/20 16:10:32 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/20/20 13:57:39 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/21/20 12:04:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls VOIP Updated 1/13/21 18 9/21/20 12:04:49 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/21/20 16:51:39 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/22/20 12:35:28 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/23/20 16:35:54 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 9/24/20 10:14:36 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/25/20 01:16:08 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 9/25/20 05:22:59 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 9/25/20 19:39:17 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/26/20 15:14:06 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/26/20 17:30:21 HERMOSA BEACH 20 911 Calls WPH2 9/26/20 18:19:24 HMB 65 911 Calls WPH2 9/26/20 18:19:51 HERM BCH 21 911 Calls WPH2 9/26/20 19:37:57 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/27/20 03:35:25 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 9/27/20 15:58:56 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 9/27/20 17:27:51 HERMOSA BEACH 23 911 Calls VOIP 9/27/20 23:07:17 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 9/28/20 10:39:35 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/28/20 19:20:08 HB 38 911 Calls WPH2 9/29/20 10:52:59 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 9/30/20 12:25:21 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/30/20 16:23:22 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 9/30/20 19:34:45 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Average Answer Time (Seconds)9.5 Updated 1/13/21 19 Ad Hoc Report: Name:Hermosa Call Answer Time Date:11/1/2020 Description:Oct-20 Los Angeles County Fire Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 10/2/2020 09:05:47 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/2/2020 21:33:41 HERM BCH 25 911 Calls WPH2 10/3/2020 10:08:04 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/3/2020 11:31:20 HMB 17 911 Calls WPH2 10/3/2020 11:34:17 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/3/2020 22:45:40 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/4/2020 15:31:43 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/4/2020 20:27:33 HERM BCH 31 911 Calls WPH2 10/4/2020 23:59:33 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/5/2020 12:08:52 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/5/2020 19:55:49 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/6/2020 10:46:56 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/6/2020 10:47:00 HERM BCH 4 911 Calls WPH2 10/6/2020 10:47:07 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/6/2020 11:44:58 HERM BCH 149 911 Calls WPH2 10/6/2020 13:35:41 HERMOSA BEACH 94 911 Calls VOIP 10/6/2020 18:07:38 HERM BCH 5 911 Calls WPH2 10/7/2020 07:24:13 HERMOSA BEACH 3 911 Calls WPH2 10/7/2020 12:14:29 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/7/2020 15:44:38 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 10/7/2020 18:08:16 HERM BCH 19 911 Calls WPH2 10/8/2020 09:30:06 HERMOSA BEACH 3 911 Calls RESD 10/8/2020 10:41:52 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 10/8/2020 22:24:18 HMB 22 911 Calls WPH2 10/9/2020 13:15:38 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/10/2020 16:13:42 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/11/2020 00:14:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/11/2020 09:07:25 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 10/11/2020 10:08:59 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 10/12/2020 21:22:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/14/2020 08:24:56 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/15/2020 07:35:40 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/15/2020 10:50:19 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/15/2020 14:37:45 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/15/2020 15:07:35 HMB 75 911 Calls WPH2 10/16/2020 13:03:44 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 10/18/2020 06:32:35 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/18/2020 09:17:10 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 10/18/2020 09:35:26 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls W911 10/18/2020 21:36:57 HERM BCH 7 911 Calls WPH2 10/23/2020 15:20:19 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/23/2020 19:50:45 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/23/2020 19:52:53 HERMOSA BEACH 4 911 Calls RESD 10/23/2020 19:56:00 HERMOSA BEACH 32 911 Calls RESD 10/23/2020 22:50:35 HMB 32 911 Calls WPH2 10/24/2020 00:47:22 HMB 3 911 Calls WPH2 10/25/2020 09:02:01 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 Updated 1/13/21 20 10/25/2020 11:53:51 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/26/2020 13:17:02 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 10/27/2020 13:26:46 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/28/2020 11:23:11 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 10/28/2020 21:29:40 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/28/2020 22:10:24 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls W911 10/29/2020 02:54:21 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 10/29/2020 02:54:40 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 10/29/2020 20:43:55 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/30/2020 15:29:46 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 10/31/2020 06:46:07 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 10/31/2020 08:11:34 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Average Answer Time (Seconds)10 Updated 1/13/21 21 Ad Hoc Report: Name: Date: Description: Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 11/1/2020 08:34:28 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 11/1/2020 13:09:10 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/1/2020 17:28:00 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 11/1/2020 18:28:30 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/2/2020 08:13:52 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/2/2020 15:24:10 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/2/2020 15:28:31 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/3/2020 07:13:39 HERMOSA BEACH 33 911 Calls VOIP 11/3/2020 21:07:28 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/4/2020 05:42:32 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/4/2020 22:39:32 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/5/2020 07:54:51 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/5/2020 11:32:18 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/5/2020 11:40:06 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/6/2020 02:54:29 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/6/2020 03:57:45 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/6/2020 11:49:37 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 11/8/2020 15:42:15 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/8/2020 16:10:26 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/9/2020 22:15:46 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 11/9/2020 22:42:11 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/11/2020 07:42:16 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 11/12/2020 09:28:12 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 11/12/2020 17:31:38 HERMOSA BEACH 17 911 Calls RESD 11/13/2020 00:19:42 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 11/13/2020 05:57:20 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 11/13/2020 14:56:22 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 11/13/2020 21:04:31 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/14/2020 14:31:27 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/14/2020 16:13:09 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/14/2020 16:57:55 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/15/2020 09:14:44 HERM BCH 39 911 Calls W911 11/15/2020 09:25:11 HERM BCH 23 911 Calls W911 11/15/2020 12:19:30 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 11/15/2020 13:27:21 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/15/2020 16:24:35 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/15/2020 18:16:18 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/16/2020 07:29:11 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/16/2020 07:30:07 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Hermosa Call Answer Time 12/1/2020 November 2020 Call Answer Time Los Angeles County Fire Updated 1/13/21 22 11/16/2020 12:27:57 HERMOSA BEACH 4 911 Calls RESD 11/16/2020 13:24:54 HERM BCH 216 911 Calls WPH2 11/17/2020 05:51:19 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/17/2020 17:31:51 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/18/2020 13:45:50 HERMOSA BEACH 17 911 Calls RESD 11/18/2020 17:59:22 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/19/2020 04:00:18 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 11/19/2020 09:12:31 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 11/19/2020 18:58:05 HERM BCH 39 911 Calls WPH2 11/20/2020 13:37:11 HERMOSA BEACH 153 911 Calls VOIP 11/20/2020 18:06:06 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/20/2020 18:09:44 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/20/2020 18:10:43 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/21/2020 18:01:36 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 11/23/2020 17:48:00 HERM BCH 0 911 Calls VOIP 11/23/2020 18:57:42 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/24/2020 07:36:31 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/24/2020 18:15:51 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 11/25/2020 02:31:24 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/25/2020 10:39:26 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 11/25/2020 10:47:35 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/25/2020 16:11:15 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 11/25/2020 18:58:08 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 11/26/2020 03:49:19 HMB 1 911 Calls WPH2 11/26/2020 14:12:37 HERM BCH 51 911 Calls WPH2 11/26/2020 23:03:23 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 11/27/2020 06:04:58 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/27/2020 12:01:25 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 11/27/2020 20:00:13 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 11/28/2020 16:07:09 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/28/2020 16:07:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/28/2020 19:35:01 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/29/2020 12:11:18 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/29/2020 15:03:32 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 11/29/2020 15:16:02 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 Average Answer Time (Seconds)10 Updated 1/13/21 23 Ad Hoc Report: Name: Date: Description: Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 12/1/2020 15:09:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/1/2020 20:13:31 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/2/2020 12:06:14 HERM BCH 44 911 Calls WPH2 12/2/2020 16:20:26 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/2/2020 20:40:09 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/3/2020 06:23:59 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/3/2020 19:35:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/3/2020 21:39:22 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/4/2020 13:34:11 HERMOSA BEACH 238 911 Calls VOIP 12/4/2020 13:38:36 HERMOSA BEACH 25 911 Calls VOIP 12/4/2020 15:57:42 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/4/2020 21:46:34 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/4/2020 21:48:22 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/5/2020 20:31:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/6/2020 14:28:19 HERM BCH 5 911 Calls WPH2 12/6/2020 15:17:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/6/2020 15:18:47 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/6/2020 18:28:44 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/7/2020 11:51:23 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/7/2020 12:14:31 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/7/2020 12:44:26 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 12/7/2020 16:31:46 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/8/2020 06:23:50 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/8/2020 10:02:08 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 12/8/2020 11:34:28 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 12/8/2020 16:56:13 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/9/2020 14:12:50 HERMOSA BEACH 17 911 Calls BUSN 12/10/2020 09:13:13 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/10/2020 12:57:48 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/11/2020 00:14:30 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 12/11/2020 15:58:25 HMB 3 911 Calls WPH2 12/12/2020 15:51:31 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/13/2020 12:34:07 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/13/2020 15:04:14 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/13/2020 23:18:41 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/14/2020 09:58:17 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/14/2020 20:05:40 HMB 85 911 Calls WPH2 12/14/2020 22:40:35 HMB 17 911 Calls WPH2 12/15/2020 15:47:35 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Hermosa Call Answer Time 1/1/2021 December 2020 Los Angeles County Fire Updated 1/13/21 24 12/15/2020 15:53:25 HERMOSA BEACH 49 911 Calls BUSN 12/16/2020 10:58:30 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/16/2020 13:30:39 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 12/16/2020 14:52:50 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/17/2020 10:07:32 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 12/17/2020 10:07:54 HERMOSA BEACH 4 Administrative BUSN 12/17/2020 10:26:34 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 12/17/2020 17:50:28 HERM BCH 23 911 Calls WPH2 12/18/2020 11:05:02 HERM BCH 71 911 Calls WPH2 12/18/2020 14:59:54 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/18/2020 15:09:02 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/18/2020 16:21:11 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 12/19/2020 02:28:49 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/19/2020 16:26:49 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 12/20/2020 23:21:57 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/23/2020 16:27:09 HERM BCH 85 911 Calls WPH2 12/23/2020 19:24:31 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/23/2020 20:56:59 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/25/2020 07:43:11 HMB 16 911 Calls WPH2 12/25/2020 09:42:03 HMB 32 911 Calls WPH2 12/25/2020 16:27:54 HERM BCH 45 911 Calls WPH2 12/26/2020 02:09:44 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/26/2020 05:56:46 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/26/2020 09:42:50 HERM BCH 9 911 Calls WPH2 12/26/2020 12:07:56 HERMOSA BEACH 62 911 Calls VOIP 12/28/2020 10:21:33 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/28/2020 14:35:27 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/28/2020 19:23:13 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/29/2020 05:09:36 HB 79 911 Calls WPH2 12/29/2020 21:57:43 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/30/2020 12:19:24 HERM BCH 238 911 Calls WPH2 12/30/2020 18:32:50 HB 38 911 Calls WPH2 12/31/2020 17:53:52 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 Average Call Answer Time (Seconds)18 Updated 1/13/21 25 LOS ANGELES COUTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ACTIVITY REPORT FOR JULY TO SEPTEMBER 2020 Type of Incidents Number of Incidents Average Response Time FIRE, EXPLOSION 3 7:20 RESCUE, EMS 277 4:37 OVERPRESSURE, RUPTURE, EXPLOSION, OVERHEAT* 1 0:08 (1) HAZARDOUS CONDITION* 9 6:50 SERVICE CALL* 13 5:08 SPECIAL OR OTHER INCIDENT TYPE* 3 4:00 GOOD INTENT CALL* 140 5:26 FALSE ALARM, FALSE CALL* 19 7:00 Grand Total 465 4:56 "Average Response Time" is reflected in minutes and seconds for the first‐arrived units (excluding Lifeguard units) at incidents. *Includes non‐emergency calls. (1) Cancelled en‐route ACTIVITY REPORT FOR OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2020 Type of Incidents Number of Incidents Average Response Time FIRE, EXPLOSION 7 3:14 RESCUE, EMS 227 4:29 HAZARDOUS CONDITION* 8 6:34 SERVICE CALL* 13 5:06 SPECIAL OR OTHER INCIDENT TYPE* 8 5:19 GOOD INTENT CALL* 108 5:15 FALSE ALARM, FALSE CALL* 19 5:31 Grand Total 390 4:43 "Average Response Time" is reflected in minutes and seconds for the first‐arrived units (excluding Lifeguard units) at incidents. *Includes non‐emergency calls. Data based on updated FireView apparatus 2020 GIS data 1 Updated 1/7/21 Los Angeles County Fire Department & McCormick Ambulance: 2020 Fire Incidents Incident Type January – April 2020 Number of Incidents January – April 2020 Average Response Time May – June 2020 Average Response Time May – June 2020 Average Response Time July– September 2020 Average Response Time July – September 2020 Average Response Time October – December 2020 No. of Incidents October – December 2020 Average Response Time Fire, Explosion 8 4:39 2 6:07 3 7:20 7 3:14 Rescue, EMS 325 5:01 267 5:00 277 4:37 227 4:29 Hazardous Condition 13 8:28 11 7:07 9 6:50 8 6:34 Overpressure, Rupture, Explosion, Overheat 0 0:00 0 0 1 0:08* - Cancelled en- route 0 0 Service Call 13 6:49 16 6:25 13 5:08 13 5:06 Special or Other Incident Type 0 0:00 1 Cancelled en-route 3 4:00 8 5:19 Good Intent Call 53 6:24 48 6:07 140 5:26 108 5:15 False Alarm, False Call 31 6:00 38 5:51 19 7:00 19 5:31 Total 446 5:17 383 5:15 465 4:56 390 4:43 Total # of Incidents in 2020 1684 2020 Average Response Time 4:82 minutes McCormick Transports Quarter No. of Completed Transports No. of Cancelled Transports January – June 2020 372 248 July – December 2020 336 278 Total 708 526 RESPONSES BY THE FIRE DISTRICT RESPONSES IN TO THE FIRE DISTRICT JANUARY, FEBRUARY, MARCH JANUARY, FEBRUARY, MARCH 1st Quarter 2019 2020 2019 2020 EL SEGUNDO FIRE 5 2 EL SEGUNDO FIRE 1 2 MANHATTAN BEACH FIRE 23 30 MANHATTAN BEACH FIRE 0 4 REDONDO BEACH FIRE 26 7 REDONDO BEACH FIRE 1 3 TORRANCE FIRE 0 0 TORRANCE FIRE 0 0 54 39 2 9 APRIL, MAY, JUNE APRIL, MAY, JUNE 2nd Quarter 2019 2020 2019 2020 EL SEGUNDO FIRE 6 1 EL SEGUNDO FIRE 1 1 MANHATTAN BEACH FIRE 27 19 MANHATTAN BEACH FIRE 2 0 REDONDO BEACH FIRE 20 4 REDONDO BEACH FIRE 2 1 TORRANCE FIRE 0 0 TORRANCE FIRE 0 0 53 24 5 2 JULY, AUGUST, SEPTEMBER JULY, AUGUST, SEPTEMBER 3rd Quarter 2019 2020 2019 2020 EL SEGUNDO FIRE 5 2 EL SEGUNDO FIRE 0 0 MANHATTAN BEACH FIRE 42 13 MANHATTAN BEACH FIRE 1 1 REDONDO BEACH FIRE 17 8 REDONDO BEACH FIRE 1 2 TORRANCE FIRE 0 0 TORRANCE FIRE 0 0 64 23 2 3 OCTOBER, NOVEMBER, DECEMBER 2019 2020 EL SEGUNDO FIRE 8 7 EL SEGUNDO FIRE 1 0 MANHATTAN BEACH FIRE 24 4 MANHATTAN BEACH FIRE 5 2 REDONDO BEACH FIRE 10 12 REDONDO BEACH FIRE 3 3 TORRANCE FIRE 0 0 TORRANCE FIRE 0 0 42 23 9 5 213 109 18 19 ANNUAL AUTO AID REPORT 2020 FINAL OCTOBER, NOVEMBER, DECEMBER 4th Quarter 2019 2020 2/3/21 1 2020 Community Engagement Photos HBPD K-9 Team and LACoFD Rescue Team Station 100 support local business Feb. 2020 CERT graduation 2/3/21 2 Station 100 2/3/21 3 LACoFD providing fire extinguisher training for HBPD 2/3/21 4 LACoFD providing fire extinguisher training for HBPD 1 Updated 1/6/21 2020 Film Permits January – December 2020 MONTH DAY EVENT LOCATION January 21 Andy Keleman Productions The Beach (at Longfellow Avenue) MONTH DAY EVENT LOCATION February 3 Open Range – Still Photo for Nike Downtown - Various Location 5 Film Permits Inc. – Commercial for Lululemon 11th Street and the Strand on the beach and Private Property 16 AVP – Still Photo Hermosa Avenue and Herondo Street on the beach 25 Skechers USA Inc. - Commercial Private Property MONTH DAY EVENT LOCATION March 4 Skills Content Studios – Online Educational Series featuring volleyball instruction from Kerri Walsh- Jennings Longfellow Avenue and the Strand – on the beach 11 Windstar Studios – Olympic short featuring Kerri Walsh- Jennings 32nd Place/33rd Street and the Strand – on the beach MONTH DAY EVENT LOCATION April Canceled due to COVID-19 Closures MONTH DAY EVENT LOCATION May Canceled due to COVID-19 Closures MONTH DAY EVENT LOCATION June Canceled due to COVID-19 Closures 2 Updated 1/6/21 MONTH DAY EVENT LOCATION July Canceled due to COVID-19 Closures MONTH DAY EVENT LOCATION August Canceled due to COVID-19 Closures MONTH DAY EVENT LOCATION September Canceled due to COVID-19 Closures MONTH DAY EVENT LOCATION October Canceled due to COVID-19 Closures MONTH DAY EVENT LOCATION November 7 Triage Entertainment, LLC Moondust Parkette and Private Residence MONTH DAY EVENT LOCATION December 4 RadicalMedia LLC Pier Plaza and the Pier City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0084 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 RECOGNIZING MAUREEN HUNT FOR HER SERVICE TO THE CITY AS HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESIDENT/CEO City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0085 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 COVID-19 UPDATE City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0090 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 UPDATE FROM CHIEF LEBARON ON COVID-19 EMERGENCY ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0087 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 INTRODUCTION OF INTERIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR, JOHN JONES City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0102 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the written communication. Attachments: 1.Letter from Matt McCool dated February 2, 2021 2.Email from Matt McCool dated February 2, 2021 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Matt McCool mccool.matt@gmail.com (310) 486-9696 January 25, 2021 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL City Attorney Michael W. Webb City of Redondo Beach 415 Diamond Street Redondo Beach, CA 90277 RE: Formal Complaint of Malicious Prosecution by Deputy City Prosecutor Papadakis Dear Mr. Webb: On July 23, 2020, I sent you a formal complaint alleging professional misconduct by your City Prosecutor’s Office for violating my rights as declared in Article I, Section 28 of the Constitution of California. Additionally, I provided compelling evidence justifying an investigation into my allegations. Over six months later, you have not even acknowledged my letter. (Link). Beyond the professional misconduct allegations, I am further alleging under the direction of Police Chief Papa, City Prosecutor Chavira and Senior Deputy City Prosecutor Michel entered into a conspiracy with the Hermosa Beach Police Department. My attacker, Thomas “TJ” Powers of Powers Realty, received a sweetheart plea deal for allegedly committing felony aggravated battery causing serious bodily injury. (Video) “When Exposing a Crime is Treated as Committing a Crime, You Are Ruled by Criminals.” On August 5, 2019, I formally reported the alleged police misconduct of obstruction of justice and conspiracy to then Hermosa Beach Mayor Armato. Also, I entered my letter into City record for the September 10, 2019 City Council meeting. (Link). On September 18, 2019, a press release by the City of Hermosa Beach stated Police Chief Papa’s retirement was effective October 1, 2019. (Link). Also, on October 1, 2019, the HBPD created a notice of arraignment. (Exhibit A). The corresponding complaint filed is for an offense on or about August 4, 2019. (Exhibit B). Clearly the false retaliatory criminal charges against me correlate to the dates in my complaint against the HBPD for obstruction of justice and conspiracy. My criminal case was dismissed on a demurrer in a pretrial hearing. (Exhibit B). Deputy City Prosecutor Papadakis charged me for an alleged offense that was not a crime. Additionally, she had no evidence the alleged offense took place in the County of Los Angeles, or I was in the County of Los Angeles on or about August 4, 2019. Furthermore, I do not believe Ms. Papadakis is ignorant of prior restraint, nor do I believe the correlating dates are a coincidence. This was malicious prosecution by Deputy City Prosecutor Papadakis. You are five weeks from an election for City Attorney for the City of Redondo Beach, and three of your prosecutors are formally named in the Hermosa Beach Police Department corruption scandal. I respectfully request you address these allegations against your staff, especially since Ms. Papadakis confirmed there are no records of investigation from my 2014 case in which I am alleging obstruction of justice and conspiracy. Fiat justitia ruat caelum, Matt McCool cc: Redondo Beach Mayor, Bill Brand (via email) Redondo Beach City Council (via email) Redondo Beach City Manager, Joe Hoefgen (via email) Redondo Beach City Clerk, Eleanor Manzano (via email) Exhibit A SUPERIOR COURT, SOUTHWEST DISTRICT NOTICE REGARDING ARRAIGNMENT DATE NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AGENCY OR PROSECUTOR FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, CONTACT (Name and telephone number): TO: Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0360 MA TIHEW TODD MCCOOL 3766 SOUTHVIEW DRIVE #218 SAN DIEGO, CA 92117 TODAY'S DATE Terea Johnson HBPD Court Liaison (310) 318-0344 CITATION/BOOKING NUMBER 10-01-19 D,R, NUMBER COURT CASE NUMBER (tf applicabla) 19-1631 DATE 1iil1T'l"18t1I!'1!'1b!!l ttJ.fet-t~ ORIGINAL COURT APPEARANCE DATE 08-04-19 CHARGES(S) 166(A)(1) P.C. VIOL RESTRAINING ORDER o On the date shown above, you were issued a citation to appear in court for arraignment. o The date you were previously given to appear in court fell on a cqurt holiday, a Saturday, a Sunday, or a non-arraignment day; therefor, your appearance date has been rescheduled as indicated below. o You were cited to appear in the wrong division (courtroom) or at the wrong address. The correct division and address are indicated below. ~ You have been named as a defendant in a criminal complaint charging you with the violation(s) shown above . You must appear in court for arraignment as indicated below. By appearing in court promptly at the time and place indicated, you can avoid the inconvenience resulting from the issuance of a warrant for your arrest. IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR IN COURT AS DIRECTED, A WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST WILL BE ISSUED. o Due to the investigative delay, a criminal complaint has not yet been filed by the prosecutor with the court. Do not appear in court on the date you were previously given. 0 Instead , appear as indicated below. 0 You will be notified by mail of your new arraignment date . If you were released on bail, your bail will be continued to your new appearance date (when assigned). o Your case has been dismissed, and you do not have to appear in court. APPEAR AS INDICATED BELOW DATIE 11/04/2019 I TIME 8:30 ~ A.M. 0 P .M. I ROOM NUMBER I DIVISION 3 LOCATION SOUTHWEST SUPERIOR COURT 825 Maple Avenue , Torrance , CA 90503-5058 DECLARATION OF MAILING I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California , that the following is true and correct: I am over the age of 18 years, not a party to this action, and readily familiar with my office's or agency's practice for the collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. In the ordinary course of business, correspondence would be deposited with the United States Postal Service on the same day it was placed for collection . I served this Notice Regarding Arraignment Date by placing a true copy in an envelope addressed as shown above, and then by sealing and placing it for collection; stamping or metering with first-class, prepaid postage; and mailing on the date stated below, in the United States mail at Los Angeles County, California, following ordinary business practices. DATE 10101/19 76A719D -SBD045 (Rev. 12/01) I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing is troe and correct. TYPE OR PRINT NAME Terea Johnson NOTICE REGARDING ARRAIGNMENT DATE DISTRIBUTION WHITE -Court Case File CANARY -Defendant PINK -Agency Exhibit B Thi s min ute order is nOI ~n o lTi c ill[ co py unle ss Co urt cel1ifi cation is rlm ,xed, MINU TE ORDER SUPERIO R COU RT OF CALIFO RNI A, CO UNTY OF LO S ANGELES DATE PRINTED: 09 /10/2 0 CAS E NO. 9TROS196 TH E PEOPL E OF TH E STA TE OF CALIFORNIA VS. DEFENDANT 01 : MATT HE W TODD MCCOOL BAIL: AP PE ARANCE AMOUNT DATE RECEIPT OR SU RETY COM PANY REGISTER DATE OF BAIL POSTED BOND NO, NUMBER CASE FILED ON 10 /18 /19 . COMPLAIN T FILED, DECLARED OR SWORN TO CHARGING DEFENDANT WIT H HAVING COMM ITTED, ON OR ABOU T 08 /04 /19 IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES , TH E FOLLOWING OFFEN SE(S) OF : COUNT 01: 166(A)(4) PC MI SD ON 09 /10 /20 AT 830 AM I N TORRANCE COURT HOU SE DEPT 713 CASE CA LLED FOR PRETRI AL AND MOTION PARTIES: GEORGE F. BIRD (JUDG E) MICHELLE MIL LIG AN (CLERK) JANET PE SUSIC H (RE P) ANASTASIA PAPADAKIS (C P) DEFENDANT IS PRE S ENT IN COURT, AND REPRE S ENTED BY DEVIN W. FRIEND ARP DEPUTY PUBLIC DEFENDER COUNT (01) : DISPOSITION: All OTHER DI SMISSALS NOT (A) TO (l) CITY PR OSEC UT OR, ANA PAPADAKIS I S APPEARING BY WEB EX. DEFENDANT'S DEMURRER TO THE COMPLA INT I S CALLE D FOR HEARING. COU RT HAS RE AD AND CONSIDE RED THE DEMURRER AN D OPPOSITION FILED HEREIN. COU RT HEAR S ORAL ARGUMEN TS MA DE BY COUNSEL. BOTH SID ES REST. COURT ORDE RS THE DEMURRER SUS TAINED AND CASE I S DISMISSED. PAGE NO. 1 PRETRIAL AND MOTION HEARING DAT E: 0 9 /10/20 From:mccool.matt@gmail.com To:Eduardo Sarmiento Cc:City Clerk Subject:FW: 1999 New Times article, "Spidergate," on MTA Police Chief Sharon Papa Date:Tuesday, February 2, 2021 11:57:39 AM Attachments:Spidergate.pdf -----Original Message----- From: mccool.matt@gmail.com <mccool.matt@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 11:52 AM To: sarmato@hermosabch.org Cc: citycouncil@hermosabeach.gov; suja@hermosabeach.gov; cityclerk@hermosabeach.gov; michael.jenkins@bbklaw.com; laura@mecoy.net Subject: 1999 New Times article, "Spidergate," on MTA Police Chief Sharon Papa Councilwoman Armato: Attached is an October 23, 1999, New Times article, "Spidergate," by Jan Golub on former Hermosa Beach Police Chief Sharon Papa as the then MTA Police Chief. On August 5, 2019, I sent you this letter alleging police misconduct and conspiracy within the Hermosa Beach Police Department: http://hermosabeach.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?M=F&ID=05517fbe-6f7a-40b4-8952 -0d2dd8f56419.pdf Additionally, I provided video evidence Police Chief Papa had situational awareness of the police misconduct of my 2014 case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32Ze57Rm0dM Here are two lines from the 1999 New Times article, "Spidergate:" "Sharon Papa runs the department by personal vendetta, not as a professional" "MTA Chief Sharon Papa, whose departmental disciplines had ruined careers and even some people's lives." This article further supports my allegation that on the date of Police Chief Papa's retirement, October 1, 2019, the initiation of a criminal case against me was a personal vendetta for my August 5, 2019 letter alleging police misconduct and conspiracy. Additionally at some point, the City should address the irregularities of Police Chief Papa's medical leave up to her retirement. Very respectfully, Matt McCool October 23-29.1997 Volume 2 Number 43 FREE Jili 'stewart: Good· ridcl~nce to the L.A. TiIJJes7 s mush-headed editor It was hard to believe that such a bi za rre story could be true. Was TV re porte r Judd McIlvan e serious abo ut "S pidergate" or mer ely goo fin g o n a slow-news night? Some tran sit cops, it seems, were keeping a black widow spid e r as a pet in a dry aquarium . Th e spid er, named Janice, after an African-Ame ri can poli cewoman , turned up dead- gassed with window-cleaner. For reasons baffling and unknown, the MTA police chief had laun ched a full-scale internal affairs arachnicid e investigation . Hundreds of office r hours had been spent inte rvi ewing every transit cop who eve r had occasion.to sociaiize with the eight-l egged mascot. Reams of paperwork had been produced, and thousands of taxpayer dollars had been poured down the proverbial s pid er-hole. How eve r am using to viewers, tbis was not a funny tale to the MTA's 350 cops. They kn ew Spidergate wasn't ju st about a Windexed bug, any more than Watergate was about a two-bit burglary . It involved a Byzantine web of investi gatio ns, suspensions, firings, arbi- tration s, and law s uits co nce rning complaints , many of th em more petty than arachnicide . It was ab out MTA Chief Sharon Papa, who se departmenta l disciplines had ruin'ed careers and even some people's liv es. - That Spidergate surface d at all (posted anonymously in an Internet chat-ro9m) indi cated what insiders already k new too well-MTA cops are angry. After two years of up s and down s, their de partment's proposed merger into th e Los Angeles County Sheriff's and Lo s An?eles Police de partments had been scuttled for a far less favor able co ntract. Played out in the dy sfunctional corridors of the dow ntown MTA Gateway Building, th e drama had escalated to shouting matches 'at MTA board meetings and e nough bac k-roo m saber-rat· tling for a year of Spin City epi so des. Exhausted observers now exp~ct the new contract to get hamme r ed through at th e MTA Bo ard meeting today, and many transit co ps feel betrayed. Fifty-three rej ects cou ld be out of work, perhaps gearing up to become liti gants against th e MTA, th e city , or th e co unty . Many LAPD acce ptees ar e nervous about th e new ''Transit Police Officer" s ub · class the LAPD has created for th em to lateral into, compl ete with a one-year prob atio nary period that some view as a holding pe n for more bloodletting. It seems th at the LAPD wants what's in the MTA 's coffers to pay for po li ce but not its co ps th emselves . 111 e transit offi cer s say the Police De partment's looking for any way possible to get rid of th em. Many angry rejectees say th ey've been red-flagged because of past di sciplin es by Chi ef Papa. They cite a li tany of firin gs and sus pens ion s for petty infracti ons and trump ed-up sexual-h ar assment claim s . Records show that, from 1991 through 1995, eig ht male offi- cers were disciplin ed for sexual h ar assment by Papa, and a dozen more, all but one of th em men, were terminated for oth er all egation s ranging from "co nduct" and "ge neral behavior" to "attendance" infractio ns. Althou g h figures since 1995 were unavailable, more than 20 officers we r e accused of mi sco ndu ct just over Spidergate alone , with an undi s- clo sed number receiving so me form of di sciplinary action. Continued on page 12 New TImes Los Anl!eles 11 Spidergate Continued ~rom page 11 Some hav e fo ught for mon ths in arbitra- tion to get ba c k th e ir jobs and lost pay only to find th eir rep utation s rui ne d any- way. Whil e most still fear Chief Papa too much to s peak on the record, so me don 't care anymore. 'The tru th needs to come out," says Car- los Diaz , 39, who has been disqualified by th e Sheriffs Depa rtment (which, lik e the LAPD , refuses to di sc uss personnel mat- ters). ''I'm losing my ca reer, and there's a po ssibi li ty my daughter won't be able to fin - ish her co ll ege education because of this." Diaz says h e was termin ated by Papa for d eroga tory la nguage-u s ing the word "s hitty " around ot her cops. "S haron Papa run s t h e de partm en t by pe r so nal ve nd etta, riot as a professional ," h e co nt e nd s, ec h o ing the sentiments of many mal e offi cer s, an d not just tho se - being fl agged. "I we nt through the humil- iati on of one whol e year of unemploy- me nt b efo r e I was r e instated through arb itration. How petty can you get? Now my 13 years are b e ing thrown out the window beca use of an admin istrative dis- ciplin e that was already addressed . Th er e is ve ry littl e progressive discipline here. It de pe nd s on who you are ." Tru e or not , th at co ntention is frequ ently stated by male tran s it officers. The mo st fla g rant exa mpl e cited i s that of Offi cer Martha Lopez , a clo se friend of Papa's who was acc used of mi sappro priating overtime mo ney but who is s till with th e d e part- me nt. "P a pa gave h e r a 30-d ay s u spen- s ion ," Dia z notes. "I was terminated for a yea r fo r saying 'shi tty.'" Papa, 39, who is ex pecte d to become th e LAPD 's youngest co mmander (only Chief Be rn ard Park s a nd e ig ht deputy chiefs occupy high er pos iti ons in th e 9,OOO-officer department) when the co ntract is finaliz ed, claims the fury s urrounding Spidergate is exagge rate d a nd that the vo ices ri s ing agai n st h e r a r e thos e of malcontents . Ind eed , it seems that man y of her officers shou ld be hun g o ut to dry. But there also appear to be se riou s probl ems with Pap a tha t are de tail ed in co urt documents and public reco rd s. And th e co p with the mo st h air-rais in g story is not hiding behi-nd a' shi eld of anonymity. Hi s tale is laid out in r eams of co urt documents and a score of inte rvi ews . It is a l so now destined to beco me a criti cal test case in the workplace warfare ove r sex ual-harassment claims. ~ .. --. ." -', "As straig ht as they co me" is how cops and perso nal fri e nds d escrib e Jack Herman. The son of a career military officer, Her- H,e rman received numerous commenda- ti ons from Deputy Chief Mark Kro eker for recru itin g fema les arid minorities. He eve n recru ited hi s own wife, Paulette, whom he me t while th ey we re both attending Ca l Stat e L.A. Th e y marri e d in 198 1, a nd Paulette He rman is now a n LAPD li eu- te nant assigned to th e Managem e nt Ser- vices Di vis io n at police headquarter s. In happier times, Jack Herman and Chief Sharon Papa H erm an r etire d from the LAPD as a sergeant in Se ptember 1991 , when h e wa s offered a li eu t e nant's job at th e MTA d e part me nt. He became what cops call a "doubl e-dippe r ," coll ecting hi s half-pay LAPD pe ns ion while earning an 'even high- e r salary from the MTA. He was recruited mer LAPD Internal Affairs Division inves- t i gato r was looking into a dispute betwee n another mal e li e ute nant a nd Sgt. Shari Barbe ric. When He rman r e ported no mi sco nduct, he rem ember s, th e chi ef was di sap pointed. He rm an says her atti - tude g av e him pause , and , by th at t im e, so did the whol e MTA d e partm e nt. "I thought, wh at have I wa lked into? Some officers were not of the high est calib er. Most of thei'n ld-timers were b as icall y security g uards . Then you h ad ve r y ta l- e nted young me n and women who want- ed to be police officers buL.e nd e d up at th e d e partment of last r esort." H e also learned that sonie MTA cops were misfits says. "There's no directio n , and peo ple walk around lo oking for people to beef." He says h e e ncountered a scam mentality toward str ess pensio ns, di sabilities, and laws uits. 'The attitud e was n't 'let's get the job done ,' but 'let's scam so me overtime money ' I mad e th e mistak e one tim e of telling so mebody to do so me wo rk . Next thing I knew I had a beef again st me." Herman qui ckl y r an afo ul of Se rgeant Barberic. Be for e j o inin g th e transit pol ite, Barb e ri c ha d b ee n ':forc ibly r e tired" from th e H awt h orn e Police De partment for m e dical r easons. In two years, she was in volv e d in 13 c l aims against th e city for fal se arrest or assault a nd battery-which r esu l ted i n some me dia no to ri ety, A d e pu ty district atto r- n ey fi l ed a d e claration that s h e had threatened him wh e n he refused to fil e ch arges agains t someone she had arrest- e d . The Hawthorne poli ce chi ef tes tifi ed in a trial ove r a lawsui t Barberic late r filed against th e HPD th'at, w h e n he re li eved h er from duty, s h e put h e r pistol to his head before placing it on his desk. The c hief forc e d h e r to retire and she was awarded a stress pe nsion of $1,200 a month for life . Barbe ric was late r award- e d another $50,000 b ecau se the depart- me nt failed to give h e r a h e aring. Hire d by th e RTD (which me rged with the Co unty Transit Co mmi ssion three year s ago t o b eco me t h e MTA) in 1985, Barb e ri c all egedl y pulled a bl ack man off a bus in 1987 whil e screamin g o bscenities at him, resulting in a laws ui t. The RTD was also s ued by a bu s drive r wh o claimed h e was beaten by Barberic and anothe r offi- cer for allegedly po cketin g $2 in fares . Both the passenge r and th e bus driv e r r e ach ed out-of-court s ettl ements wi th the transit agency. Afte r d iscoverin g h e r his- tory, Herman didn 't kn ow what to think when he learne d that Barbe r ic and Chief P a pa were close friends. One MTA cop recalls how Barbe ri c u sed to burst into Papa's offi ce a ny time s h e wanted: "Th ey were so clo se th ey we nt to parti es togeth- e r dressed in th e sam e colo r s ." Papa eventuall y put He rm an in charge of bidding for the poli cing of th e Re d Line. He put togethe r a proposal and won the $6-million contract-b ea tin g out the LAPD . Pleased by hi s s uccess, sh e made him officer in charge of Re d Lin e policing. Herman ran patrols of the lin e successful- ly , and two years later took over th e Blue Line as well. With 150 officers g uarding the rails, Herman had nearly half th e MTA force und e r hi s co mmand . By most acco un ts, h e did a good job-but h e made some enemies . "I'm a hard-a ss; I admit it They didn't like me because I mad e peopl e do their jobs. I was not the ordinary MTA li e utenant. I'm "SHARON PAPA RUNS THE DEPARTMENT BY PERSONAL VENDETTA," SAYS CARLOS DIAl, FIRED FOR USING THE WoRO "SHITTY" AROUND OTHER . , COPS. "I WENT THROUGH THE HUMILIATION OF ONE WHOLE YEAR OF UNEMPLOYMENT BEFORE I WAS REINSTATED. HOW PETTY CAN YOU GET?" man s pe nt fo ur years at a Ca tholi c semi- nary and was in th e Army before joining th e LAPD. He serve d 23 years, in Patrol , Vice, Internal Affairs, and as a criminal law in stru ctor at th e LAPD Academy . Sev e r al of th e d e partm e nt's top brass s ing hi s praises. One of hi s me ntors was Parks. 12 New Times Los Angeles by Papa, th e n the yo ung star of the transit po l ic e . He r e m em be rs at first thinking that Papa was charming, articulate, believ- ab l e -a politicia n. But H e rman soon found, as o ne mal e MTA cop cautioned, that sh e was "a s hark." ,Th e first .assig nm e nt Papa gave th e for - and rejects, drummed out of othe r depart.- me nts for good cause. . For Herman, who has a master 's degree in public administration, th e cul ture was like so m e thing he'd r e ad about in text· books. "The MTA police department is a b a~a l , lov eless, lifeles~ organization ," h e old -sc hool LAPD , a disciplinarian." One MTA cop conc ur s , observing that Herman so metimes "had unreason- a bl e expectations." But Sgt. Robert Lewis says h e r equested to work with He rman because h e wa s a d is ciplinari- Continued on page 14 October 23-29, 1997 Spidergate Continued from page 12 an. "Hi s wo rk eth i c is lik e mine. H e gl'ts th e job d on e." Sometime after Sharon Papa married ex- San Fernando police Officer Raymond Hook er in ]994, she and bridesmaid Shari Barberi c had a falling out. Most believe it had to do with Barberic's not getting a pro- motion to li e ut e nant, or Papa's not r es pondin g s uffici e ntly to Barber- ic's c ompl a in ts a bout all eged harassme nt. P a pa says it c on- ce rn ed a philo s oph ica l di sag r ee me n t ove r wheth e r th e forc e s hould merge with the Po lic e and S h e riff's departm e nts . Wh a te v- e r, l3arb e ri c began criti - cizing Papa and b eca me a frequ e nt grievant. She had ongoing beefs with men on th e forc e, pa r- ticularly Jack He l"lil a n. By April 19%, in pa rt to mo lli fy Barb e ri c. Pa pa d irect ed he r best fri e nd and maid of ho nor, Sg t. Lettic ia De lga d o, in int e rview t h e fe ma les in th e d e part m e nt about p oss i ble in c i- d e n ces o f se x ual hara ssme nt. Aft er co n- dueling h e r s urv ey , De lgado told the c hi e f there was nothing s ig- il ifi cant to re p0l1. On July 5, 19%, He r- man wa s s tanding in th e hallway at Tran s it Police H ea dquarters , talking with another mal e MTA cop. Two femal es approache d, and Herman step ped closer to the man h e was talking with so the wom e n cou ld pass behind him. But one of them, De lgado, in stead tried to pass betwe e n th e two me n and almost collided with He rman. Sh e stopped and stared at him for a seco nd , theil walked around, elbowing him in th e s id e as she passed. No words were exchange d. This h a llw ay jostle would eventually becom e th e s ubj ect of more scrutiny, cu ss our pl an ." On July 19 , there was anoth- er meetin g with Barberic, Sgt. Janic e Hart, Sgt. Be lind a J e nkins , Sgt. Marla Mill e r , Offi cer Martha Lopez, and Delgado. Capt. Walter Schick, a P apa ally, also attende d , agreeing with the women that "there is a major sexual-harassment problem h e r e" and that "Sgt. Robert Lewis and Lt. J ack He rman s hould be terminated," according to an e ntry in Barberic's diary. . Papa, meanwhile, had recently appointed Herman to h ead the MTA 'departm e nt's own Inte rnal Affairs office. Afte r th e bump- ing, s h e ap pointe d Janice Hart to investi- gate Herman. Hart-the African-American sergeant whose name would later be given to a s pid e r-was a member of Barberic's class-action group. "It was unbelievable," Herman r ecalls . "[Hartl was my subordinate in lA, and she was investigating me for sexual harassm e nt while she was part of a group preparing a class-action sexual-harass- m ent lawsuit. She eventually filed a seven-p age IA r e port concluding that i close d, which she claimed was di scrimina- tory. Barberic al so all eged in h e r co m- plaint that Sergeant Lewis h ad defa m e d h er by fa lsely claim in g s h e h ad a dv anced h e r caree r wi th illi ci t pe rso na l r e lation - s hips , including a lesbian one with Papa. She compla ined that Frias had harassed h e r by displ aying intimate ph otogr a phs s h e all owed him to take of h e r when th ey were dating and that Frias had grabbed Sergeant Hart's breasts. And s h e claim e d she h ad been unfairly den ie d a promotion to li e ute nant in favor of a male ca ndidate i.n July 1995. In . addi tion to s e eking compen- satory damages, she demanded in the suit that "imme diate and corrective action" b e taken against Lewis and Frias, "up to and including te rmi- nation of their employment." . On Sept. 12, the day after the MTA was served with Barberic's suit, Papa fire d He r- man as a result of the Delgado bumping incident. That same day, she fire d Frias for At Herman's initial h earin g on Se pt. 20 , Capt. Ronald Eutsey found t.hat the Delga- do inc ident wa s neither inte ntional nor sex- u a ll y mo ti vate d an d r e'coolm e nded t h at H e rman 's t e rmina t i on b e' r esc inde d. Although it was unprecede nte d for a chief to ignore such a findin g by a h e aring offi- cer, Papa s ustained He rman 's firin g . Frias was dealt with in s imilar fashion . Although arbitration investigatorLt. Mo Ange l found that the three witnesses r efute d Hart's claim that Frias h ad touche d h e r breasts, Papa upheld his termination, too. M ea nwhile, Barb e ri c 's coalitio n we nt to the me dia . On Oct. 13, 1995, a front- page story in t h e Los Angeles T imes was headlin ed "Female MTA Police Allege Wid e Sexual Harass- ment." Papa reacted as though hit by a b omb. ''I'm ju s t trying to figur e out what the h e ll 's going on in my de partm e nt," s h e told th e Tim es. Answ e ring a ll e gations that she was in se n s itive to the proble m , Pa pa s tate d : "11wrf' is no way , as a female c hi ef, t h at I'm go in g to a ll ow th e wo m e n in th e de partm e nt to b e mistreat- e d." S h e a lso s tr es sed that s h e was taking s t e p s to r e me- dy a ny prob- le m s . Barbe ric, however, would h ave non e of t h at. "She i s u sing h er gen- der as a shield agai n st any ty p e of this kind of com- plaint," Barber- ic said to the Times. Later ih a Daily News story, Barberic was quoted as saying: "What's most unconscionable is that it is happening with a"female police chief. I would expect more." Two weeks after Papa r ece iv ed this drubbing in the press, and despite Captain Eutsey's finding, she served Herman with "I FIT INTO A CATEGORY OF BASICALLY UNEMPLOYABLE," SAYS JACK HERMAN, FIRED OVER A HALLWAY JOSTLE, EVEN THOUGH A HEARING OFFI- CER RULED THAT HE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN. "IF YOU'RE A MALE OVER 50 WHO'S BEEN FIRED FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT, IT'S THE KISS OF DEATH." revi ew, testimony, and li tigation than most homi cid es. It would also mark the end of He rman's 27-year career in law enforce- me nt. Two days afte r the incide nt, Herman was notifi e d that Delgado h ad fil e d a sel{U- aI-harassment co mplaint against him. A week later, two visiting attorneys gave a presentation to MTA officers on sexual hara ssment. Acc ordin g to an entry in Bar- bcric's diary. wh ich late r became evidence in legal procee dings, Barberic gathered a g roup of fema les aft er the meeting "to dis- 14 "~~_Tj\!le~Lo~Angele~ was guilty of sexual harassment." B.arberic , meanwhile , informed Papa that s h e and her group were preparing a suit and urge d that some heads b e put on a pol e -including Lewis , Herman , and Officer Frank Frias's. And Barbe ri c h ad another su rpri se in store : On Sept. 9, 1995, she fil e d a perso nal lawsuit against the MTA for sex u a l discrimination, sexual h arassment, and re taliation-complaining of having bee n in structed not to ineet with male e mployees in her office with the door allegedly grabbing Hart's breasts in front of th~ee witnesses. Papa also gave Lewis a 30- day suspe nsion for s taring at a fe ma le in the hallway. Papa escalate d h e r campaign by later demoting Sgt. Clifford Ladage and suspending office manager Rick Provencio for 30 days for inappropriate c omme nts. Although a ll these actions would later b e r esc ind e d following leng thy arbitrations, Papa wou ld point to th'c m .in d e po s iti ons and press inte rviews a s e vid e n ce of h e r toughness on sexual harassm ent. his final termination notice . The n , on Dec. 5, the other shoe fe ll on Papa when the ACLU filed a lawsuit against the MTA for sexual harassme nt and discrimination on behalf of plaintiffs Marla Miller, Janice Hart, and Belinda J e nkins (Barberic late r joine d in). They claime d un e qual treat- m ent and a hostil e work e nvir o nment (lewd comments, unwanted to uching, and bumps in the hallway). The s uit is sched- ul e d for trial in Decem bel'. Herman's firing we nt to a rbitration in Oc,tobe.f,23-29.1997 April 1996. Thirteen full days of testimony stretched out over a year, producing 2,500 transcript pages and 150 exhibits. "The case was so spurious," maintains Howard Ekeriing, Herman's attorney, "that I could- n't believe Sharon Papa didn't slither under the table and die from shame." During her testimony, Delgado, Papa's 'maid of honor, cited a "prior incident" three years before the bumping to show a "pattern of conduct." Some foot-beat offi- cers were standing around in the hallway after receiving their new summer uniforms. Delgado and the others were showing off their new shorts, and Delgado's were too large for her. Everyone was laughing and pointing, and Herman walked up to the group and said to Delgado: "Those look like your grandfather's shorts." Lisalee Wells, a retired Navy attorney and expert on sexual-harassment cases, reviewed the case and testified for Her- man. "The most horrifying thing," Wells says, "was listening to Ms. Delgado explain how she thought sexual harass- ment was anything that bothered or offended her. That's outrageous. That's riot how it works. She was saying .. .if she was upset, she was harassed. It wo,uld seem that neither she nor Chief Papa had been counseled properly on sexual harassment. They used the 'grandfather's shorts' statement to establish a pattern, but that is not sexual harassment, and it',s not a pattern. And people ,are allowed to laugh at you if they want. Then, to hear that Delgado was a close personal friend of Papa's-it made my head spin:" Sharon Papa attended her first career training session on sexual harassment on Dec. 5, 1995, more than a month after she fired Jack Herman,her personnel records show. Expert Wells has witnessed real sexual harassment, but she has also witnessed the damage wrought by spurious sexual- harassment claims. She describes how male Navy officers are now advised not to be alone in a room with the opposite sex, and how some commanders advise their male officers not to even eat lunch with females, Tailhook was indeed egregious, she points out, but it also triggered a tide of questionable claims that have set intergell-, der relations back many years. 'The notion that anything that offends you is sexual ' harassment. .. has liasically ruined the work atmosphere and environment," she says. "Meanwhile, women gain nothing by ascen- dancy oVer someone'throtigh a synthetic misapplication ofthe law. "As for Jack Herman, look athil\ history. This is a man who actively recruited women into policing, even before [women] had to be [recruited]: What are ,the chances that after 27 years he's going to harass them in the workplace?" . Some observers note that Papa'sdiring of Herman may come to mirror a celebrated case involving Miller Brewing Company, _ which fired a man when a female employee complained that he had harassed her by talking about a Seinfeld episode. The man filed suit, and a jury later ordered Miller to pay him $26.6 million in damages. Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, commenting on the case ,in his syndicated column, wrote: "Finally the pendulum seems to be swinging against 'the joke police' assigned by corpora- tions to enforce sexual-harassment laws." Paul Lees-Haley, an L.A. psychologist and sexual-harassment expert who is unfamiliar with the Herman case, says employers have made tremendous strides in eliminating sexual harassment. "Fif- teen years ago, I could give you a lot of reitlly good examples of companies that were letting harassers get away with it. Now I can give you a lot of examples of crazy, ridiculous claims. We've always had both real and spurious cases, but the relative proportion today has shifted in the direction ofthe ridiculous. I see cases today where the allegedpeqietrator is really the victim of a lying, exploitive, so- called victim." Sexual-harassment claims, Lees-Haley concludes, are not always about real harassment. "A lot of them are about get- ting even. They. are about people who think they are better performers [at their jobs] than others think they are, so they are pro- tecting their self-esteem by making the " ,.,c", -, '.,', , . other side'look unreasonable." Says L.A. attorney William Waldo, who specializes in sexual-harassment cases: "There is a lot of money motivation. And an extraordinary number of allegations are made after the plaintiff suffers an adverse employment situation-a warning or bad performance evaluation." Many sexual-harassment cases are han- dled privately within companies or in law- suits, making it difficult to get accurate statistics on their volume or success rate. But a trend can be seen in the cases that made it to the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Its latest statis- tics show that the EEOC received 6,127 complaints in 1990 (the year of Anita Hill's claims against then-Supreme Court nomi- nee Clarence Thomas) and 15,342 in 1996-a more than 120 percent increase. Perhaps more revealing EEOC statistics , No. p'Csky nne print. _ No nasty hi.;ld.m cha~ges. involve cases determined to have "merito- rious allegations." These declined from 30.3 percent to 18.2 percent in the same period. About a third of the complaints in 1996 (6,153) were determined to have no reasonable cause by the EEOC. Mean- while, sexual harassment has become a billion-dollar industry for consultants, who train managers and employees how to avoid workplace problems, and, of course, for lawyers. Attorney Waldo says that over the past five years his business has "absolutely exploded." In Jack Herman's case, arbitrator Mei Liang Bickner split the decision, ruling that his near- bump of Delgado was harassment but that he should not be terminated.' In June, temporary MTA CEO Linda Bohlinger chose not to abide with the nonbinding arbitration and refused to suspend the termination of Herman's $72,000- Continued on page 16 ,'k I YOUR BEST PROTECTION AGAINST HIDDEN FEES. No minimwn baIan~ requirements. Period. No direct deposit requirements, Period, No monthly service charges, Period, No hidden fees, Period. Period. To open an account, call1-800-GW-ASK-US, Or stop ~ your local Great Western branch today. GREATWESTERN BANK~; A W<l,ohUl.tJh.lll Ala/lUll C<J"'P""Y .,. Spldergate Continued from page 1& a-year job. ''Ifs a rubber.{;tamp for papa, "sighs attorney Ekerling.The case is now going to Superior Court . ..' front .of everybody when I turned in my slip. Later on, he ,made fun of my gla:ss- happened to Her- declines to dis- year. The average LAPD commander has departed under a cloud of controversy 26 years on the force, and Papa has 16 in over alleged ticket-fixing in the depart- the Ml'Adilpllttment. Th¢ liYeJ!-!l&~lAPDin.ent,ancl. outsiders seemed unWilling 1<r9 commandei-·is50. Papa iSl9.Fifteen of apply for the job,Amongotherr.easons : LAPD's 18 commanders haveaneastone that the post Was unattractive, transit,: master's degree. Papa has a'B~:A,;Jrom authorities even then wereplanningto get"\ For Herman, 51, who is now in law scrr66t and plans to become a labor atto"rrley spec cializing in sexual-harassment matters, law;-'; enforcement was his life. "Imagine if someone takes away from you the thing you are most proud of," he laments. because of all the pending chief denies offi- 'cers' claims that she used discipline as a knee-jerk defense against charges of sexual 'harassment, saying: "I only take discipli- nary actions against officers based. on legit- the University of Phoenix (a night school . out of policing eventually. . in L.A.). By contrast, LAPD's first female, Even more troubling than Papa's inexpe-: commander, Betty Kelepecz, has 17 rience, her detractors say, have been years in theLAPD and has passed the aspects of her performance. The critics state bar examination. Margaret York, say she failed to implement adequate use- Herman tested for a job as an L.A. Coun- ty District Attorney's Office investigator, scoring first out of 200 applicants. But he wasn't hired. "I fit into a category of basi~ cally unemployable," he says. "If you're a male over 50 who's been fired for sexual harassment, it's the kiss of death." He and Paulette almost lost their house. "I had to tell my ex-wife and 20-year-old son I couldn't pay for his education." Herman sold some cars and a beloved Harley Davidson. Luckily, his insurance picked most ofthe $150,000 in legal expenses. Meanwhile, during the arbitration' of Herman's case, Shari Barberic won her personal lawsuit. A federal jury 'awarded her $150,000, ruling she had been dis: criminated against by Papa for being passed over for lieutenant. However, it also ruled that the photos taken of her by Frias did not constitute harassmf'nt, since Barbei"ic had consented to them and had' given them to Frias. (Some MTA c()ps grumble that she was never disciplined for being twice romantically involved with transit cops below her rank. In addition to Frias, they refer to her new husband, Sgt. Robert Delgadillo.) Barberic refused to conimentfor this st(>ry. While three witnesses and tWo invesiiga; tors agreed that Frank Frias never grabbed Janice Hart's breasts, it took rum a year of arbitration to get his job back with full back pay and benefits. Still, his career was ruined, says Emir Phillips, Frias's attorney. Papa made Frias and Her- man "sacrificial Iambs" to show she's tough on sexual harassment, the lawyer contends. Frias believes he's been reject- ed by the LAPD'because of the bogus ThehaUwaY~~herelheinfamOUSjostlingincidentoccurred: charges. He declined interview requests' from New Times, citlirg{ear of Papa. im~te complaints." (LAPD Inspector (There's still an MTA departmental inves-Generar'Katherine Mader, who reviewed tigation going into those seven-year-old the officers wanting to transfer into her cheesecake photos of Barberic.) department, also declined to discuss indi- Sergeant Hart, meanwhile, added the spi-vWual cases-inc1udingPapa's.} der·naming to her pending suit. "It's some-.. ;,,\~sked if she is qualified to be an LAPD thing that's demeaning as far as me being a,,;}' .. , ander, Papa states: "I believe I'm female," Hart says of Spidergate."l just did~{;~'. ed to be a deputy chief." " 1''''n''lh''''''f<.~"10 commander, has a and 29 years on the force. That Papa might be given such a coveted rank as a political spoil infuriates some LAPD veterans. Papa attended the Rio Hondo Police Academy in January 1980, after which $he joine.d the Santa Monica Police Department. But she quit before she fin- of-force and pursuit policies, resulting in ' huge'settlements against the MTA:....c· including a $20.75-mil1ion award toa woman crippled in a car crash after she was chased by transit police. In a survey two years ago by the TransiL Police. Officers Association, 118 of 152 cops polled stated that they were not sat- isfied with the chiefs performance; 109, more than two-thirds, felt the MTA need· ed a new chief; 132 stated that Internal Affairs penalties were not fairly and $.i:·. formly applied; 34 said there w!ls:s~x dl§.:,' crimination against females; a:nff, 88 said~; men were discriminated against,(A,t tjie,;' time of the survey, 94 perce,nt·.of tl1e';1f department was male.} , :;"" Asked about Papa's treatment of Her- man, Chief Parks demurs: "I'm,not famil- iar with any individual case, and I wouldn't talk about any individual case." As for Papa's fitness, he says; "I have 'ito problem with any officer wh<1iheets,QuiqualifiBa::~ tions and passes otl'ir'backg-,t~,!ii1~ chetk.',': Any issue relevant in ber biiclij'tound will ;', be investigated.'" 0 ... ,"', : .. ~:~ ':C'~;; Sharon Papa's arrival at the LArD would.' ,Wt one cop-Lt. Paulette Herman-in !l • , ;very uncomfortable spot. The 17-year vet; 'eran, who's highly touted to make cap~; tain, declined at first to be interviewed for this article. After all, how could she con~ , demn what happened to her husband without condemning the MTA chi«d? . There would be no politic way to hangk' it. Speaking out could deep-six her car~er;'" as Papa may soon outrank her at die . LAPD. Addressing the truthcould~rsQ . anger Parks andtbe mayor, iJ theY3,~e ". intent on bringjng Papa into the den.a~t-':; ment as a cOll)IDander. " ." But Paulette Herman, 43 is also the for- mer president of the Los Angele~ Women Police OfficersAssociation. She has devot- ed years to i!)sues,P,ertaining to womenilp,sl police. Sh '. ";ultimatelythat:~rre:~ could not r '.' .' .... . . . . .o/;!'.' "The Delga:ollicidentwould noteven.:ha'Ve" been a persob.rtel complaint at LAPD~OQr' because seXtllltharassment is tolerated but n't think it was appropriate or professioti<> ':S\j'urces say" ousted Chief Willie . a!''' As for reports ,;,;;.If';i.~;;>,:;'~>t~,:) 'i"~; '. ~~f~:;~;:;n;~·!~~WHI1EJRREE'WITNESSES AND TWO INVESTIGATORS g~~U~~g offi~~~ AGREED. IH'AT FRANK FRIAS NEVER GRABBED ANOTHER ':;;';;"tieliluffie atthe LAPD people know what sexual harass- 'men!' is," she says. "The women on the MTApoHce have no idea. Chief Papa whopostedtheSpl-OFFI'C' 'f"B' 'S' ··It·'R·· EASTS AS SHE etA MEO' IT TOO 'A":;' ~he:~~~:r~~~l: s~~,'.~;: .,' .'. . ~'" . K HIM . failed to get them trainedill; sexual harassment She has allowed them to use. it as ,a .' weapon and a tool t.o get ~'%~~:~~~:i~a,!se. ,'.lEI'B;'Df ARB:IJRATION TD>GET HIS dOBBACK. Belinda J enkins:';;:2:~i?;;:~~:;';(~;;: . . . .'. ., '.,', .. is another black female MT~~{~ei~t~;Wit1iams-underpressure from Mayortsh:ed her one-year probation period. involved in the pending suit. "Mii:lewas: Richard Riordan to push through the Aske,d the circumstances of her depar- n't a problem of harassment," sbe says; merger with the LAPD and Sheriff's' tUr:e,she says: "I resigned from the "it was more racial discrimination and departments-had promisedtomake 'SrvfPD for a variety of reasons; I don't age bias. It's a little of everything. They Papa LAPD's first female deputy chief, a' thiIik I want to discuss it with a reporter." put it all together." Still, she thinks Her-position that pays a minirnu~;j)f $113,712 The RTD hired her as a police officer in man got what he deserved, recalling a a year. Yet a revie""of,b,et"fetord sug-Marth 1981, and she was promoted time when "he em barrassed me like I gests that she1ioe>§,'tltlt':irieH'the usual through the ranks to lieutenant. She was' was a little kid. He wanted to show his criteria for even a commander's job, made chief in January 1990, without serv- auth.orJ);g~".~H,e,cL\1J]ie.(l.me time off in which pays a minimum of $103,251 a ing as a captain. The previous chief had 16 New TImes Los Angeles ahead, to keep their jobs, and for financial gain. . . "What really frightens me is that these women belittle the importance of true cases of sexual harassment. There still are real cases, but they don't occur that frequent- ly ... [Papa's1 MO is to fire employees, right or not, and let them fight t.o get their jobs back ... Fot her to: come over as a comrhan-, del' would be an embarrassment to all the other women on the job, as well as to all the better-qualified commanders."Il!l. October 23-29. 1997 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0088 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0089 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES (City Clerk Eduardo Sarmiento) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following minutes: 1.January 26, 2021 Regular Meeting Due to staffing shortages in the City Clerk’s office, the following minutes will be provided as soon as they become available. 1.May 12, 2020 Regular Meeting 2.May 21, 2020 Special Meeting 3.May 26, 2020 Special Meeting 4.June 9, 2020 Regular Meeting 5.June 23, 2020 Special Meeting 6.September 29, 2020 Joint Meeting of the City Council and Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission 7.October 13, 2020 Regular Council Meeting 8.October 19, 2020 Adjourned Regular Meeting 9.October 27, 2020 Regular Meeting Respectfully Submitted by: Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Minutes Tuesday, January 26, 2021 Closed Session 5:00 P.M Regular Session 6:00 P.M. Virtual Meeting via Zoom City Council Justin Massey, Mayor Michael Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Stacy Armato, Councilmember Mary Campbell, Councilmember I. CALL TO ORDER The City Council Regular Meeting of the City of Hermosa Beach met via a virtual meeting held pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom March 17, 2020 on the above date. Meeting was called to order by Mayor Massey at 6:01 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was led Mayor Massey III. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers Armato, Campbell, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey Absent: None IV. CLOSED SESSION REPORT Closed session was canceled. V. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Massey announced the Beach Cities Health District’s Safe in the South Bay Series is bringing health experts, cities, chambers, schools and community members together around this fast-moving pandemic. The live-streamed series #4 is scheduled for Thursday, February 4th from 5:00–6:30pm and will focus on COVID-19 vaccinations and the psychology and resilience of living during a pandemic. He encouraged everyone to join the esteemed panel of experts who will provide the most up-to-date information on COVID-19 vaccines and the ways residents, organizations, businesses, schools, and the Beach Cities community can support COVID-19 recovery. Interested parties can register at www.bchd.org. Mayor Massey also announced February’s Coffee with the Mayor Event . The event will take place on Saturday, February 20th from 10:00 AM–11:00 AM. He shared that this is a casual event with no agenda. He added that this is a great opportunity for members of the public to ask questions and to hear most recent City updates. He added that advance registration is required, so please register by visiting the City’s website. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 1-26-20 Regular City Council Meeting) VI. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Armato motioned to approve the agenda, seconded by Councilmember Campbell. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Campbell, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey NOES: None VII. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS a. COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT b. AMANDA GORMAN’S RECITAL OF THE HILL WE CLIMB (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 1-26-20 Regular City Council Meeting) VIII. CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager Lowenthal provided a COVID-19 update and gave the latest information regarding vaccinations. She added that hospitalizations are decreasing, and hospital ICU levels projected to be above 15% for the Southern California Region in the coming weeks, California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday lifted the temporary Regional Stay at Home Order. This led to the L.A. County Department of Public Health announcing that it plans to issue an amended Health Officer Order that will allow outdoor dining to resume on Friday January 29, 2021. She also announced that the City’s Temporary Lane Realignment Project was completed January 15, 2021 and provided additional details on the execution and benefits of the project. City Manager Lowenthal then announced that the West Coast Basin Barrier Project will begin in February along the northern section of the City’s Greenbelt. She shared how the important project will replace three existing wells in Hermosa Beach and a number of wells in Manhattan Beach that help form a barrier of water to keep sea water out of fresh groundwater supplies. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 1-26-20 Regular City Council Meeting) IX. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION—ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC The following members of the public provided public comment: 1. Joseph Rubrugie 2. Trent Larson 3. Dean Francois 4. Jonathan Wicks (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 1-26-20 Regular City Council Meeting) a. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION MOTION: Councilmember Campbell moved to file and receive written communications, seconded by Councilmember Armato. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Campbell, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey NOES: None X. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS a. UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES Mayor Massey provided clarification about item 14f on the agenda that has been continued to the February 9, 2021 agenda. He also addressed the topic of written communication and explained it will be brought back on a future agenda as part of a broader discussion to update the entire 2015 resolution related to how the agenda is structured. Mayor Pro Tem provided an update on the Los Angeles County Sanitation District meeting he attended. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 1-26-20 Regular City Council Meeting) XI. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved to approve the consent calendar, seconded by Councilmember Campbell. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Campbell, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey NOES: None a. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES b. CHECK REGISTERS c. MEMORANDUM REGARDING REVENUE REPORT, COVID-19 REVENUE TRACKING REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR DECEMBER 2020 d. MEMORANDUM REGARDING CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2020 e. CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS f. ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS g. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A LOCAL SALES TAX REVENUE SHARING AGREEMENT AND SALES TAX SHARING IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT FOR THE REDONDO MITSUBISHI DEALERSHIP LOCATED JOINTLY IN HERMOSA BEACH AND REDONDO BEACH h. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF JANUARY 15, 2021 i. ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18, 2020 j. LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR DESIGNATION OF HERMOSA BEACH’S SECTION OF THE COASTAL BIKE PATH AS PART OF US BIKE ROUTE 95 k. ACTION SHEET OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 19, 2021 l. PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS m. ORDINANCE NO. 21-1424 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REPEALING EXISTING CHAPTER 5.16 OF TITLE 5 RELATING TO CABLE TELEVISIO AND REPLACING IT WITH NEW CHAPTER 5.16 OF TITLE 5 RELATING TO STATE VIDEO SERVICE FRANCHISES XII. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION None XIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS – TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M. a. APPROVAL OF 2021 IMPACT LEVEL III EVENTS INCLUDING: CBVA TOURNAMENTS (5/30-5/31, 8/14-8/15 AND 9/4-9/5); BEACH TENNIS TOURNAMENTS (6/5-6/6 AND 8/21-8/22); HERMOSA BEACH TRIATHLON (6/11-6/13); JVA AND BVCA NATIONAL BEACH CHAMPIONSHIP (7/15-7/20); AAU JUNIOR NATIONAL BEACH VOLLYBALL CHAMPIONSHIP (7/21-7/25); AAU JUNIOR OLYMPIC GAME (7/26-7/29); AAU SOUTHERN PACIFIC SERIES (8/6-8/8); AND SKECHERS PIER TO PIER FRIENDSHIP WALK (10/24); AND DESIGNATION OF TWO NOTHING WEEKENDS ON 6/25-6/27 AND 8/27-8/29 Public Hearing was opened by Mayor Massey, and the following members of the public participated: 1. Trent Larson 2. Mark Paaluhi MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved to approve the item, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Detoy. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Campbell, Armato, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey NOES: None b. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ALLOCATION OF APPROXIMATELY $97,533 OF FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS FOR SIDEWALK RECONSTRUCTION, AUTHORIZING USE OF CDBG FUNDS FOR CONTRACTORS, AND GRANTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AUTHORITY TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF COMPLETION Item continued to the February 9, 2021 City Council meeting. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 1-26-20 Regular City Council Meeting) XIV. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. RECEIVE VERBAL REPORT ON EMERGENCY ENFORCEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH PANDEMIC-RELATED HEALTH ORDERS FROM BOTH THE CITY AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES HEALTH DEPARTMENT Chief LeBaron provided an update on enforcement measures to ensure compliance with pandemic related health orders. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 1-26-20 Regular City Council Meeting) b. ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDIANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CLARIFYING AND EXTENDING THE TEMPORARY COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL MORATORIUM ON EVICTIONS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND SETTING FORTH THE FACTS CONSTITUING SUCH URGENCY MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved to approve the item, seconded by Councilmember Campbell. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Campbell, Armato, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey NOES: None c. RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE CITY RELATING TO CONDUCTING A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY MAY 11, 2021 MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved to approve the item, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Campbell, Armato, and Mayor Pro Tem Detoy NOES: None (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 1-26-20 Regular City Council Meeting) d. CONSIDERATION OF THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER SERVICES WITH LAURA MECOY COMMUNICATIONS, LLC Public comment was provided by the following person: 1. Dean Francois MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved to approve the item, seconded by Councilmember Campbell. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Campbell, Armato, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey NOES : None (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 1-26-20 Regular City Council Meeting) e. BROWN ACT DEMAND FILED BY ALASTAIR HAMBLIN, JED SANFORD, AND ANTHONY HIGGINS Public comment was provided by the following person: 1. Dean Francois MOTION: Councilmember Campbell moved to approve staff recommendation, seconded by Councilmember Armato. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Campbell, Armato, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey NOES : None (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 1-26-20 Regular City Council Meeting) XV. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS a. TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS There was no discussion on this item. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 1-26-20 Regular City Council Meeting) ADJOURNMENT Mayor Massey adjourned the City Council meeting to Wednesday February 2, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. for a joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission. The Council meeting concluded at 8:42 p.m. Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0094 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the following check registers. Attachments: 1.Check Register 1/14/2021 2.Check Register 1/21/2021 Respectfully Submitted by: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 01/14/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 5:50:21PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96575 1/14/2021 ACCESS, INC.20-0054 ADA CONSULTING SERVICES/ OCT-DEC 202021696 301-8602-4201 22,755.00 Total : 22,755.0021696 96576 1/14/2021 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CO OP 10280 TAXI VOUCHER PROGRAM / NOV 202011437 145-3404-4201 1,548.35 Total : 1,548.3511437 96577 1/14/2021 AQUA FLO SI1654228 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/ DEC 202009366 001-6101-4309 350.73 Total : 350.7309366 96578 1/14/2021 AXON ENTERPRISES, INC.SI-1705197 TASER MODEL 7 CEW EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE21022 153-2106-5405 30,394.80 Total : 30,394.8021022 96579 1/14/2021 BAKER, BEN 2002591-003 CLASS REFUND, #9121 DUE TO SCHEDULING22197 001-2111 406.00 Total : 406.0022197 96580 1/14/2021 BRADLEY, KIM 2002594-003 CLASS REFUND, # 9120 DUE TO LOW22199 001-2111 218.00 Total : 218.0022199 96581 1/14/2021 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE Stmt 1/4/21 PRISONER LAUNDRY/ DEC 202000163 001-2101-4306 216.42 Total : 216.4200163 96582 1/14/2021 CAPITAL WHOLESALE LIGHTING 434103 ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/ NOV21720 105-2601-4309 595.05 ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/ DEC434156 105-2601-4309 286.65 Total : 881.7021720 96583 1/14/2021 CASTELLANI, SHANNON 2002593-003 CLASS REFUND, # 9121 DUE TO LOW21810 001-2111 218.00 Total : 218.0021810 96584 1/14/2021 CDWG 2776506 PRINTER TONER/OCT 202009632 2b (1) 01/14/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 5:50:21PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96584 1/14/2021 (Continued)CDWG09632 102.46 5949360 1,059.00 Total : 1,161.4609632 96585 1/14/2021 CHEN, STEPHANIE 2002595.00322200 218.00 Total : 218.0022200 96586 1/14/2021 CONTINENTAL MAPPING SERVICE 12032020398 2,800.00 Total : 2,800.0020398 96587 1/14/2021 CORDOVA, JOHN PO 3583714850 99.98 9.50 Total : 109.4814850 96588 1/14/2021 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 9904406200121950 18,816.00 Total : 18,816.0021950 96589 1/14/2021 CWE CORPORATION 2039617920 24,255.00 Total : 24,255.0017920 96590 1/14/2021 DOVE, GUY PO 3562819358 150.00 Total : 150.0019358 96591 1/14/2021 EASY READER Stmt 501100181 1,111.01 Total : 1,111.0100181 96592 1/14/2021 EMERGENCY SPEC PHYS T341814595 WC14033 430.00 Total : 430.0014033 96593 1/14/2021 FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY ASSOC INC 50197 001-3302-4305 PRINTER TONER/ DEC 2020 715-1206-4305 CLASS REFUND, # 9120 DUE TO LOW 001-2111 PUBLIC NOTICE SERVICES/ DEC 2020 001-4101-4201 PHONE CASE & SCREEN PROTECTOR 001-4202-4305 001-4202-4305 LARIAC ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION FOR SERVICES 715-4202-4201 ON-CALL ENGINEERING SRVS/9-10 TO 11-30-2 301-8694-4201 Per Diem/POST Supervisory Course 001-2101-4312 MAT REQ 708575/LEGAL ADS/DEC 2020 001-1121-4323 FIRST AIDE/ NOV 2020 001-1203-4320 FBINAA ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR CHIEF16206 01/14/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 5:50:21PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96593 1/14/2021 (Continued)FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY ASSOC INC16206 001-2101-4315 125.00 Total : 125.0016206 96594 1/14/2021 FILE KEEPERS, LLC 13020-AMI0047-0004 CD LARGE-FORMAT PLANS/ NOV 202021096 001-4201-4201 1,137.92 Total : 1,137.9221096 96595 1/14/2021 GALLATIN INVESTIGATIONS 2021-0001 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS/JAN 202122096 001-2101-4201 1,209.20 POLYGRAPHS/ JAN 20212021-0002P 001-2101-4201 200.00 Total : 1,409.2022096 96596 1/14/2021 HAMPTON, JEANNINE PO 35825 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE REFUND.22194 001-3840 91.15 Total : 91.1522194 96597 1/14/2021 HERMOSA POOLS 632 FOUNTAIN SERVICE19611 001-4204-4201 750.00 Total : 750.0019611 96598 1/14/2021 K9 SERVICES LLC HBPD-12 K9 OFFICER MAINTENANCE TRAINING/ DEC 20221552 170-2105-4317 250.00 Total : 250.0021552 96599 1/14/2021 KEREN, SARA PO 35826 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE REFUND.22196 001-3840 186.95 Total : 186.9522196 96600 1/14/2021 LEARNED LUMBER B725222 MAT REQ 008567/MAINTENANCE SUPP/DEC 202000167 001-4204-4309 48.36 Total : 48.3600167 96601 1/14/2021 MANIACI INSURANCE SERVICES 939 BENEFITS CONNECT ADMIN/DEC 202018312 001-1203-4201 596.70 Total : 596.7018312 96602 1/14/2021 MARTIN CHEVROLET 798049 FLEET MAINTENANCE PARTS - HB5/DEC 202015912 715-2101-4311 69.14 01/14/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 5:50:21PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 69.14 96602 1/14/2021 MARTIN CHEVROLET15912 96603 1/14/2021 MCCORMICK AMBULANCE 248346 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT SERVICES/ NOV 202020898 001-1201-4201 21,930.00 Total : 21,930.0020898 96604 1/14/2021 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 5970296 FENCING FOR SEA VIEW PARK16663 157-2702-4201 601.92 Total : 601.9216663 96605 1/14/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 144519226001 MAT REQ 791291/OFFICE SUPPLIES/DEC 202013114 001-2101-4305 92.22 MAT REQ 987294/OFFICE SUPPLIES/DEC 202014545951401 001-4601-4305 25.27 MAT REQ 987294/OFFICE SUPPLIES/ DEC 2020145460323001 001-4601-4305 30.65 MAT REQ 791292/OFFICE SUPPLIES/ DEC 2020146077912001 001-2101-4305 71.51 MAT REQ 791292/OFFICE SUPPLIES/ DEC 2020146079382001 001-2101-4305 22.56 TONER FOR PRINTER, BOXES146788272001 001-1203-4305 17.25 001-1203-4305 1.64 TONER FOR PRINTER, BOXES146788272002 001-1203-4305 133.63 001-1203-4305 12.69 Total : 407.4213114 96606 1/14/2021 PARKS COFFEE CALIFORNIA, INC.70047729 COFFEE SERVICE - PD/ DEC 202022071 001-2101-4305 94.67 001-2101-4306 94.68 Total : 189.3522071 96607 1/14/2021 PETTY CASH 1/11/2021 PETTY CASH/SEP20-NOV2018547 001-2101-4312 77.85 001-2101-4317 196.58 001-2101-4305 67.43 001-2101-4306 44.87 001-2101-4313 28.98 01/14/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 5:50:21PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96607 1/14/2021 (Continued)PETTY CASH18547 001-3302-4317 45.00 001-4101-4305 54.72 001-4202-4305 26.35 170-2105-4201 45.00 715-2101-4311 123.88 715-3104-4311 156.52 715-3302-4311 100.17 Total : 967.3518547 96608 1/14/2021 PROVIDENCE MEDICAL ID 600000285 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS/ NOV & DEC 202001911 001-1203-4320 2,164.00 Total : 2,164.0001911 96609 1/14/2021 RACE COMMUNICATIONS 115897 DEDICATED INTERNET SERVICE/JAN 202122179 715-1206-4201 1,037.33 Total : 1,037.3322179 96610 1/14/2021 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF 571676 CITY PROSECUTOR SERVICES / NOV 202003282 001-1132-4201 16,667.00 Total : 16,667.0003282 96611 1/14/2021 RIO HONDO COMMUNITY COLLEGE PO 35562 POST SUPERVISORY COURSE01070 001-2101-4312 228.00 Total : 228.0001070 96612 1/14/2021 SAGECREST PLANNING AND ENVIRON 2234 PLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES/ NOV 202021406 001-4101-4201 6,407.50 Total : 6,407.5021406 96613 1/14/2021 SARDARIAN, ELENA 2002592.003 CLASS REFUND, # 9119 WITHDRAWL22198 001-2111 213.00 Total : 213.0022198 96614 1/14/2021 SBCU VISA 011915 HOLIDAY PARTY DOOR PRIZE; PAID WITH03353 001-1101-4319 105.00 HOLIDAY PARTY DOOR PRIZE; PAID WITH013592 001-1101-4319 90.76 HOLIDAY PARTY DOOR PRIZE; PAID WITH100048 001-1101-4319 200.00 01/14/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 5:50:21PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96614 1/14/2021 (Continued)SBCU VISA03353 HOLIDAY PARTY DOOR PRIZE; PAID WITH116845 001-1101-4319 179.92 001-1101-4319 17.09 HOLIDAY DINNER DOOR PRIZE133512 001-1101-4319 19.20 001-1101-4319 1.82 PAPER FOR PAFS2551461 001-1203-4305 32.00 001-1203-4305 3.04 HOLIDAY PARTY DOOR PRIZE; PAID WITH280796-22-5288 001-1101-4319 139.00 001-1101-4319 13.21 HOLIDAY PARTY DOOR PRIZE; PAID WITH280796-22-5315 001-1101-4319 58.90 001-1101-4319 5.60 HOLIDAY PARTY DOOR PRIZE; PAID WITH28163 001-1101-4319 40.50 001-1101-4319 3.85 HOLIDAY PARTY DOOR PRIZE; PAID WITH304337 001-1101-4319 136.95 001-1101-4319 13.01 REGISTER RECEIPT ROLLS351826 001-1204-4305 159.88 001-1204-4305 15.19 MEMBERSHIP FOR CITY CLERK - EDUARDO SARM39433 001-1121-4317 175.00 HOLIDAY PARTY DOOR PRIZE; PAID WITH CITY41703 001-1101-4319 91.25 001-1101-4319 8.67 PAPER FOR HOLIDAY PARTY8068215 001-1101-4319 67.80 001-1101-4319 6.44 HOLIDAY PARTY DOOR PRIZE; PAID WITH996633 001-1101-4319 37.49 001-1101-4319 3.56 Total : 1,625.1303353 96615 1/14/2021 SBCU VISA 210039435840 CUPCAKES FOR OFC TAYLOR RETIREMENT03353 01/14/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 5:50:21PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96615 1/14/2021 (Continued)SBCU VISA03353 001-2101-4305 31.98 2021 LEGISLATIVE SUMMIT285470 001-2101-4317 150.00 Total : 181.9803353 96616 1/14/2021 SESAC, LLC 747407 SESAC ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL20175 001-4601-4315 483.00 Total : 483.0020175 96617 1/14/2021 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 7966-4 MAT REQ 008568/PAINTING SUPPLIES/ DEC17903 001-3104-4309 76.03 Total : 76.0317903 96618 1/14/2021 SIGNVERTISE 9719 BANNER INSTALL/REMOVE/ DEC 202009491 001-4202-4201 550.00 BANNER INSTALL/REMOVE/ JAN 219723 001-4202-4201 550.00 Total : 1,100.0009491 96619 1/14/2021 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, LLC 104941794-001 MAT REQ 987235/LANDSCAPING SUPP/NOV 202019829 001-6101-4309 990.76 Total : 990.7619829 96620 1/14/2021 SMART & FINAL Stmt 1/4/21 OFFICE/CLEANING/FOOD SUPPLIES/ DEC 202000114 001-2101-4305 54.32 001-2101-4306 281.88 001-4601-4305 26.22 Total : 362.4200114 96621 1/14/2021 SOUTH BAY CENTER FOR 12/31/2020 DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES/ OCT-DEC 20210764 001-1201-4201 1,100.00 Total : 1,100.0010764 96622 1/14/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 0-01-414-1071 ELECTRICITY/NOV & DEC 202000159 105-2601-4303 250.48 001-4204-4303 7,429.04 ELECTRICITY/DEC 20202-00-989-7315 001-3104-4303 612.04 001-4204-4303 1,568.47 01/14/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 5:50:21PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96622 1/14/2021 (Continued)SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO00159 105-2601-4303 2,912.86 ELECTRICITY - PUMP STATION/ DEC 20202-01-414-3994 160-3102-4201 56.35 ELECTRICITY/ NOV & DEC 20202-01-414-4281 105-2601-4303 12,254.27 ELECTRICITY/ DEC 20202-19-024-1604 001-4204-4303 590.66 ELECTRICITY/ DEC 20202-20-128-4825 001-3304-4303 1,621.97 ELECTRICITY/ DEC 20202-20-984-6369 105-2601-4303 63.53 Total : 27,359.6700159 96623 1/14/2021 SOUTHLAND FIRE ALARM GROUP INC 3148957 ANNUAL FIRE ALARM INSPECTION AND REPAIR16339 001-2101-4306 340.00 Total : 340.0016339 96624 1/14/2021 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 8060776844 MAT REQ 791290/ OFFICE SUPPLIES/ DEC09532 001-2101-4305 83.23 Total : 83.2309532 96625 1/14/2021 UPS 000023R146011 SHIPPING SERVICES/ DEC 202014148 001-2101-4305 8.55 SHIPPING SERVICES/ JAN 21000023R146021 001-2101-4305 9.35 Total : 17.9014148 96626 1/14/2021 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 71681742 VOIP PHONES - BASE 3/ NOV 202018666 001-3302-4304 108.79 VOIP PHONES - CR/NOV 202071681750 001-4601-4304 142.39 VOIP PHONES - EOC GYM/NOV 202071681758 001-1201-4304 61.88 VOIP PHONES - YARD/ NOV 202071681762 001-4202-4304 145.04 VOIP PHONES - BARD/ NOV 202071682773 001-3302-4304 69.84 01/14/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 5:50:21PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 527.94 96626 1/14/2021 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES18666 96627 1/14/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS 9868908018 CELL PHONE USAGE - CD/NOV 202003209 001-4201-4304 189.59 PD TRUNK MODEMS/ NOV 20209869271294 153-2106-4201 418.11 Total : 607.7003209 96628 1/14/2021 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 00223625 CODE ENFORCEMENT SERVICES/ NOV 202010703 157-2702-4201 5,655.00 Total : 5,655.0010703 96629 1/14/2021 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 010-46218 ANNUAL DISCLOSURE SRVCS/2015 LEASE REV15188 001-1202-4201 250.00 DISTRICT ADMIN/OCT-DEC 2020010-46559 139-1219-4201 348.48 135-1219-4201 370.68 Total : 969.1615188 96630 1/14/2021 WITTMAN ENTERPRISES LLC 2011062 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT BILLING/ NOV 202013359 001-1202-4201 2,967.15 Total : 2,967.1513359 96631 1/14/2021 WOOTAN, JOHN PO 35831 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE REFUND.22195 001-3840 1,066.43 Total : 1,066.4322195 5176359 1/11/2021 DEPT OF HEALTH CARE SRVS/GEMT GEM0221HB95 MED TRANSPORT QUALITY ASSURE FEE/APR-JUN21347 001-1201-4251 4,780.40 Total : 4,780.4021347 5716938 1/13/2021 CALPERS FISCAL SERVICES DIV PO 35783 REPLACEMENT BENEFITS CONTRIBUTIONS/ JAN15230 001-2101-4184 9,490.80 Total : 9,490.8015230 Bank total : 221,301.94 59 Vouchers for bank code :boa 221,301.94Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 59 01/14/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 5:50:21PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 10 inclusive, of the check register for 1/14/21 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 1/28/21 01/21/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 4:53:53PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96632 1/21/2021 AT&T MOBILITY 12102020 PD & CSO CELL PHONES/NOV 202013361 001-2101-4304 478.20 001-3302-4304 169.48 PW ADMIN & FANGARY CELL PHONES/NOV 202012142020 001-4202-4304 173.60 001-1101-4304 59.13 Total : 880.4113361 96633 1/21/2021 CA ASSOC CODE ENFORCE OFFICERS 300013264 CACEO FOR ANTHONY PADILLA12504 001-4201-4315 95.00 Total : 95.0012504 96634 1/21/2021 CA DEPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTR 0-016-504-524 SALES AND USE TAX/ CALENDAR YEAR 202020816 001-2023 3,325.00 125-2023 70.00 157-2023 89.00 170-2023 256.00 301-2023 285.00 715-2023 41.00 Total : 4,066.0020816 96635 1/21/2021 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE Acct 4286211111 WATER USAGE - OCT 202000016 105-2601-4303 4,426.51 001-6101-4303 21,333.45 001-4204-4303 1,097.61 001-3304-4303 219.43 WATER USAGE - NOV 2020Acct 4286211111 105-2601-4303 4,372.74 001-6101-4303 24,413.73 001-4204-4303 1,149.72 001-3304-4303 248.38 Total : 57,261.5700016 96636 1/21/2021 CDWG 4649532 LAPTOPS FOR CITY MANAGER'S TEAM09632 001-1201-5401 2,697.00 001-1201-5401 288.21 Total : 2,985.2109632 2b (2) 01/21/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 4:53:53PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96637 1/21/2021 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES C0009653 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES 20/2120781 001-2202-4251 458,519.00 180-2202-4251 3,589.00 001-2202-5601 30,306.00 001-2202-4111 10,630.00 Total : 503,044.0020781 96638 1/21/2021 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 3307408 2020 CA VEHICLE CODE BOOK00571 001-3302-4305 40.43 Total : 40.4300571 96639 1/21/2021 FENCE MASTERS 883 FENCE AT SOUTH PARK21847 301-8609-4201 3,875.00 Total : 3,875.0021847 96640 1/21/2021 GRAINGER 9686159444 MAT REQ 435486/MAINT SUPPLIES/OCT 202010836 715-3104-4311 55.41 Total : 55.4110836 96641 1/21/2021 GRANICUS INC 133329 WEBHOSTING 12/15/20 TO 12/14/2114589 715-1206-4201 9,962.25 Total : 9,962.2514589 96642 1/21/2021 GROH, MARK LEE HB-012 CITATION HEARING EXAMINER SERVICE/ JAN 221597 001-1204-4201 120.00 Total : 120.0021597 96643 1/21/2021 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS SI00415132 MAT REQ 791294/OFFICE SUPPLIES/ DEC 202016742 001-2101-4305 34.28 MAT REQ 435056/OFFICE SUPPLIES/ DEC 2020SI00415216 001-1204-4305 25.49 Total : 59.7716742 96644 1/21/2021 LA UNIFORMS & TAILORING INC 7361 PD UNIFORMS/ G JOHNSON20771 001-2101-4314 960.77 Total : 960.7720771 96645 1/21/2021 M6 CONSULTING INC 1514-20 LAND USE PLAN CHECKS/ NOV 202019487 001-4201-4201 4,827.50 LAND USE PLAN CHECKS-SKECHERS/NOV 20201515-20 01/21/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 4:53:53PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96645 1/21/2021 (Continued)M6 CONSULTING INC19487 001-2131 610.00 Total : 5,437.5019487 96646 1/21/2021 MCCORMICK AMBULANCE 249231 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT SERVICES/ DEC 202020898 001-1201-4201 21,930.00 Total : 21,930.0020898 96647 1/21/2021 PEP BOYS Stmt 12/25/20 AUTO SUPPLIES/OCT - DEC 202000608 715-2101-4311 404.68 715-2601-4311 154.90 715-3102-4311 15.65 715-3104-4310 122.07 715-3302-4311 186.68 715-4206-4309 10.94 Total : 894.9200608 96648 1/21/2021 RED SECURITY GROUP, LLC 69129 DOOR LOCK SUPPLIES/ DEC 202013255 001-4204-4309 250.76 REPLACEMENT KEY/ HB4669153 715-3302-4311 76.65 Total : 327.4113255 96649 1/21/2021 RJ PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL 616 FI CARDS21153 001-2101-4305 147.58 001-2101-4305 14.02 DUI CARDS617 001-2101-4305 167.58 001-2101-4305 14.02 Total : 343.2021153 96650 1/21/2021 SAGECREST PLANNING AND ENVIRON 2248 PLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES/DEC 202021406 001-4101-4201 9,047.50 Total : 9,047.5021406 96651 1/21/2021 SBCU VISA 00980077 CC GIFT CARDS FOR EMPLOYEE HOLIDAY GIFT03353 001-1101-4319 8,835.00 ONBOARDING LUNCH/ JOHNSON12102020 CC 001-2101-4305 325.35 CONSTANT CONTACT ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION FOR121620 CC 01/21/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 4:53:53PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96651 1/21/2021 (Continued)SBCU VISA03353 001-1201-4201 663.00 ADD'L CELL PHONE DATA STORAGE/ DEC 2020211393303852 CC 001-2101-4305 0.99 SHIPPING CITY TILE PLAQUES TO CITY OF PA25331 CC 001-1101-4305 10.00 CITY-RELATED EVENT ADS/ NOV 20206928007 CC 001-1201-4201 8.51 REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF A REPL7831443 CC 001-1201-4305 87.55 TEMPORARY HOLDING CELLS TRAININGPO 35850 CC 001-2101-4313 75.00 INTEREST ON SHORT PYMTStmt 11/30/20 CC 001-1201-4201 47.52 001-2026 47.52 001-2027 -47.52 INTEREST ON SHORT PAYMENTStmt 12/31/20 CC 001-1201-4201 6.34 001-2026 6.34 001-2027 -6.34 Total : 10,059.2603353 96652 1/21/2021 SOCAL GAS 011 004 5767 8 NATURAL GAS - YARD BLDG/ DEC 202000170 001-4204-4303 29.39 Total : 29.3900170 96653 1/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 2-09-076-5850 ELECTRICITY/ DEC 202000159 105-2601-4303 140.17 Total : 140.1700159 96654 1/21/2021 TORRANCE AUTO PARTS Stmt 12/31/2020 MAINT PARTS/ OCT - DEC 202016735 715-2101-4311 227.53 715-3102-4309 27.10 715-3104-4311 151.09 Total : 405.7216735 96655 1/21/2021 TR COPY & PRINTING COMPANY 7787 PARKING PERMIT RENEWAL POSTCARDS15279 001-1204-4305 1,110.00 001-1204-4305 105.45 01/21/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 4:53:53PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,215.45 96655 1/21/2021 TR COPY & PRINTING COMPANY15279 96656 1/21/2021 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 71682780 VOIP PHONES/NOV 202018666 001-1101-4304 8.05 001-1121-4304 12.69 001-1132-4304 3.80 001-1141-4304 7.58 001-1201-4304 31.09 001-1202-4304 18.97 001-1203-4304 15.18 001-1204-4304 22.78 001-1208-4304 1.42 001-2101-4304 170.75 001-4101-4304 27.87 001-4201-4304 30.58 001-4202-4304 37.95 001-4204-4321 3.79 160-3102-4201 3.80 715-1206-4304 3.79 Total : 400.0918666 24950932 1/20/2021 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE Check Run 1/21/21 WORK COMP CLAIMS REIMB/JAN 202114691 705-1217-4324 11,024.79 Total : 11,024.7914691 55480027 1/20/2021 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE Check Run 1/21/21 LIABILITY CLAIMS REIMB/JAN 202114691 705-1209-4324 33,826.39 Total : 33,826.3914691 57600932 1/20/2021 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE Check Run 1/21/21 WORK COMP CLAIMS REIMB/JAN 202114691 705-1217-4324 3,886.30 Total : 3,886.3014691 256400932 1/21/2021 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE Check Run 1/21/21-WC WORK COMP CLAIMS REIMB/JAN 202114691 705-1217-4324 5,698.05 Total : 5,698.0514691 Bank total : 688,071.96 29 Vouchers for bank code :boa 688,071.96Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 29 01/21/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 4:53:53PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 6 inclusive, of the check register for 1/21/2021 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 1/28/2021_ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0097 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 2021 Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of January 5, 2021. Attachments: Minutes of January 5, 2021 Approved: Kelly Orta, Community Resources Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ MINUTES REGULAR MEETING of the PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION January 5, 2021 – Council Chambers, City Hall 1315 Valley Drive – 7:00 P.M. Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission Lauren Pizer Mains, Chairperson Barbara Ellman, Vice Chairperson Jani Lange Jessica Guheen Traci Horowitz ************************************************************************************************************************ THIS MEETING IS HELD PURSUANT TO EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 ISSUED BY GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM ON MARCH 17, 2020. ANY OR ALL COMMISSIONERS MAY ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE BY TELECONFERENCE/VIRTUAL MEETING. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE BY TELECONFERENCE. ************************************************************************************************************************ 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call Present: Commissioners Pizer Mains, Ellman, Lange, Guheen and Horowitz. Senior Recreation Supervisor Lisa Nichols and Community Resources Manager Kelly Orta. 4. Announcements 5. Presentations A. None 6. Miscellaneous Items and Reports – Community Resources Manager A. COVID-19 Updates B. Updates Regarding Items Previously on the Commission’s Agenda C. Sand Snowman Recap 7. Public Comment Anyone wishing to address the Commission on items pertaining to parks and recreation that are not listed on the agenda may do so at this time. The Brown Act generally prohibits the Commission from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. Comments from the public are limited to three minutes per speaker. Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission agendas and staff reports are available for review on the City’s website at www.hermosabeach.gov. Written materials distributed to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission within 72 hours of the meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the Community Resources Department during normal business hours from Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m.–6:00 p.m. None. 8. Correspondence A. Letter from Tony Higgins (dated November 29, 2020) 9. Consent Calendar A. Approval of the Regular Meeting Action Minutes of December 1, 2020 B. Approval of the November 2020 Activity Report Motion by Commissioner Ellman to approve Items A and B on the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Lange seconded the motion. Motion passed with a 5-0 vote. 10. Items Removed from the Consent Calendar for Separate Discussion None. 11. Public Hearings A. Approval of the 2021 Impact Level III Special Events; and Designation of Two “Nothing Weekends” on the 2021 Special Event Calendar Recommendation: That the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission hold a Public Hearing to: 1. Review the following 2021 Impact Level III Special Events and make a recommendation to the City Council to approve the inclusion of the following events on the 2021 special event calendar: o “CBVA Tournaments” on Sunday, May 30 – Monday, May 31; Saturday, August 14 – Sunday, August 15; and Saturday, September 4 – Sunday, September 5 on the volleyball courts located north of the Pier; o “Beach Tennis Tournaments” on Saturday, June 5 – Sunday, June 6; and Saturday, August 21 – Sunday, August 22 on the beach tennis courts north of the Pier; o “Triathlon” on Friday, June 11 – Sunday, June 13 on Pier Plaza, the beach south of the Pier, and various roads; o “JVA and BVCA National Beach Championship” on Thursday, July 15 – Tuesday, July 20 on the volleyball courts north and south of the Pier and the beach tennis courts; o “AAU Junior National Beach Volleyball Championships” on Wednesday, July 21 – Sunday, July 25 on the volleyball courts north and south of the Pier; o “AAU Junior Olympic Games” on Monday, July 26 – Thursday, July 29 on the volleyball courts north and south of the Pier; o “AAU Southern Pacific Series” on Friday, August 6 – Sunday, August 8 on the volleyball courts north of the Pier; and o “Skechers’ Pier to Pier Friendship Walk” on Sunday, October 24, on the pier head and the strand north of the Pier. 2. That the Commission recommend the designation of two Nothing Weekends on the following dates: o Friday, June 25 – Sunday, June 27; and o Friday, August 27 to Sunday, August 29. Motion by Commissioner Horowitz to recommend for approval to the City Council the inclusion of the 2021 Impact Level III Special Events and the designation of two nothing weekends on the 2021 special event calendar as proposed by Staff. Commissioner Guheen seconded the motion. Motion passed with a 5-0 vote. 12. Matters for Commission Consideration A. Approval of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission’s April and September 2021 Meeting Schedule Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission approve meeting dates for April and September 2021 Motion by Commissioner Ellman to approve the meeting dates of April 12 and September 9 in 2021. Commissioner Lange seconded the motion. Commissioner Guheen opposed. Motion passed with a 4-1 vote. 13. Commissioners’ Reports A. Sub-committees i. Special Event (Lange and Ellman) ii. Community Theatre (Lange and Pizer Mains) iii. Municipal Leases (Pizer Mains and Horowitz) iv. Community Resources Department Use Policies (Ellman and Guheen) v. Clark Building Improvements (Ellman and Pizer Mains) vi. Naming Policy (Horowitz and Guheen) B. Commission Liaison Roles i. Surfers Walk of Fame (Lange) ii. South Park (Guheen) iii. Access Hermosa (Ellman) – on hold 14. Items Requested by Commissioners A. None 15. Other Matters 16. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned by Commissioner Pizer Mains at 8:52pm. City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0045 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE SERVICES AND AMBULANCE MONTHLY REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2020 (Emergency Management Coordinator Brandy Villanueva) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the December 2020 Fire and Ambulance monthly report. Executive Summary: City departments generate monthly reports to provide a snapshot of activities performed each month. Prior to the transition of fire and ambulance transport services to the County of Los Angeles,the Hermosa Beach Fire Department developed monthly response reports.After the transition,the monthly report was updated to include Los Angeles County Fire Department and McCormick Ambulance information and continues to be uploaded to the website.The following report provides details for the services provided for the month of December 2020. Background: At the February 11,2020 Council meeting,City Council requested to have the monthly reports placed onto the City Council agenda under the consent calendar.On the July 14,2020 Council agenda,the monthly reports for February through May 2020 were provided and accompanied by a detailed staff report explaining the change. This report reflects the services for December 2020. Discussion: The December 2020 monthly report provides an overview of services provided by LACoFD and McCormick Ambulance (Attachment 1:December 2020 LACoFD and McCormick Ambulance Monthly Report). General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0045 Safety Element Goal 5.High quality police and fire protection services provided to residents and visitors. Policies: ·5.2 High level of response.Achieve optimal utilization of allocated public safety resources and provide desired levels of response, staffing, and protection within the community. Fiscal Impact: Fire and ambulance services are contracted and accounted for during the annual budget process. Attachments: 1. LACoFD and McCormick Ambulance Monthly Report--December 2020 Respectfully Submitted by: Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ E100 S100 Total FIRE, EXPLOSION 113 ‐ Cooking fire, confined to container 1 1 0.51% 118 ‐ Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1 1 0.51% FIRE, EXPLOSION Total 2 2 1.02% HAZARDOUS CONDITION 412 ‐ Gas leak (natural gas or LPG)1 1 0.51% 444 ‐ Power line down 1 1 0.51% HAZARDOUS CONDITION Total 2 2 1.02% RESCUE, EMS 300 ‐ Rescue, EMS incident, other 2 2 4 2.04% 320 ‐ Emergency medical service, other 1 1 2 1.02% 321 ‐ EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 71 64 135 68.88% 322 ‐ Motor vehicle accident with injuries 2 2 4 2.04% RESCUE, EMS Total 76 69 145 73.98% SERVICE CALL 551 ‐ Assist police or other governmental agency 1 1 2 1.02% 553 ‐ Public service 1 1 0.51% SERVICE CALL Total 2 1 3 1.53% SPECIAL OR OTHER INCIDENT TYPE 900 ‐ Special type of incident, other 3 2 5 2.55% SPECIAL OR OTHER INCIDENT TYPE Total 3 2 5 2.55% GOOD INTENT CALL 600 ‐ Good intent call, other 20 5 25 12.76% 611 ‐ Dispatched and cancelled en route 3 1 4 2.04% 652 ‐ Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 1 1 0.51% GOOD INTENT CALL Total 24 6 30 15.31% FALSE ALARM, FALSE CALL 700 ‐ False alarm or false call, other 1 1 0.51% 730 ‐ System malfunction, other 1 1 0.51% 735 ‐ Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 3 3 1.53% 744 ‐ Detector activation, no fire ‐ unintentional 3 3 1.53% 745 ‐ Alarm system activation, no fire ‐ unintentional 1 1 0.51% FALSE ALARM, FALSE CALL Total 9 9 4.59% Grand Total 118 78 196 100.00% Note: Data based on updated fireview ‐ apparatus 2020 GIS data. Hermosa Beach units responses. LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT HERMOSA BEACH FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2020 Incident Type UNIT RESPONSES Percentage Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 1 DAY OF THE WEEK E100 S100 Total Sunday 10 8 18 Monday 14 8 22 Tuesday 17 11 28 Wednesday 20 16 36 Thursday 25 13 38 Friday 19 13 32 Saturday 13 9 22 Grand Total 118 78 196 Note: Data based on updated fireview ‐ apparatus 2020 GIS data. Hermosa Beach units res LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT HERMOSA BEACH FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2020 UNIT RESPONSES ‐ 5 10 15 20 25 30 E100 S100 Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 2 TIME OF THE DAY E100 S100 Total 00:00:00 TO 00:59:59 2 1 3 01:00:00 TO 01:59:59 ‐ 02:00:00 TO 02:59:59 4 3 7 03:00:00 TO 03:59:59 1 1 04:00:00 TO 04:59:59 ‐ 05:00:00 TO 05:59:59 ‐ 06:00:00 TO 06:59:59 2 1 3 07:00:00 TO 07:59:59 2 1 3 08:00:00 TO 08:59:59 3 3 6 09:00:00 TO 09:59:59 5 5 10 10:00:00 TO 10:59:59 9 4 13 11:00:00 TO 11:59:59 8 4 12 12:00:00 TO 12:59:59 9 9 18 13:00:00 TO 13:59:59 4 3 7 14:00:00 TO 14:59:59 4 4 8 15:00:00 TO 15:59:59 11 8 19 16:00:00 TO 16:59:59 11 9 20 17:00:00 TO 17:59:59 6 2 8 18:00:00 TO 18:59:59 4 2 6 19:00:00 TO 19:59:59 9 5 14 20:00:00 TO 20:59:59 9 5 14 21:00:00 TO 21:59:59 7 3 10 22:00:00 TO 22:59:59 4 3 7 23:00:00 TO 23:59:59 4 3 7 Grand Total 118 78 196 Note: Data based on updated fireview ‐ apparatus 2020 GIS data. Hermosa Beach units responses. LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT HERMOSA BEACH FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2020 UNIT RESPONSES ‐ 2 4 6 8 10 12 00:00:00 TO 00:59:5901:00:00 TO 01:59:5902:00:00 TO 02:59:5903:00:00 TO 03:59:5904:00:00 TO 04:59:5905:00:00 TO 05:59:5906:00:00 TO 06:59:5907:00:00 TO 07:59:5908:00:00 TO 08:59:5909:00:00 TO 09:59:5910:00:00 TO 10:59:5911:00:00 TO 11:59:5912:00:00 TO 12:59:5913:00:00 TO 13:59:5914:00:00 TO 14:59:5915:00:00 TO 15:59:5916:00:00 TO 16:59:5917:00:00 TO 17:59:5918:00:00 TO 18:59:5919:00:00 TO 19:59:5920:00:00 TO 20:59:5921:00:00 TO 21:59:5922:00:00 TO 22:59:5923:00:00 TO 23:59:59E100 S100 Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 3 Ad Hoc Report: Name: Date: Description: Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs CallTypeId ALI Class 12/1/2020 15:09:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/1/2020 20:13:31 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/2/2020 12:06:14 HERM BCH 44 911 Calls WPH2 12/2/2020 16:20:26 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/2/2020 20:40:09 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/3/2020 06:23:59 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/3/2020 19:35:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/3/2020 21:39:22 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/4/2020 13:34:11 HERMOSA BEACH 238 911 Calls VOIP 12/4/2020 13:38:36 HERMOSA BEACH 25 911 Calls VOIP 12/4/2020 15:57:42 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/4/2020 21:46:34 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/4/2020 21:48:22 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/5/2020 20:31:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/6/2020 14:28:19 HERM BCH 5 911 Calls WPH2 12/6/2020 15:17:46 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/6/2020 15:18:47 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/6/2020 18:28:44 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/7/2020 11:51:23 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/7/2020 12:14:31 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/7/2020 12:44:26 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 12/7/2020 16:31:46 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/8/2020 06:23:50 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/8/2020 10:02:08 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 12/8/2020 11:34:28 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 12/8/2020 16:56:13 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/9/2020 14:12:50 HERMOSA BEACH 17 911 Calls BUSN 12/10/2020 09:13:13 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/10/2020 12:57:48 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/11/2020 00:14:30 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 12/11/2020 15:58:25 HMB 3 911 Calls WPH2 12/12/2020 15:51:31 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/13/2020 12:34:07 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/13/2020 15:04:14 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/13/2020 23:18:41 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/14/2020 09:58:17 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/14/2020 20:05:40 HMB 85 911 Calls WPH2 12/14/2020 22:40:35 HMB 17 911 Calls WPH2 12/15/2020 15:47:35 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Hermosa Call Answer Time 1/1/2021 December 2020 Los Angeles County Fire Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 4 12/15/2020 15:53:25 HERMOSA BEACH 49 911 Calls BUSN 12/16/2020 10:58:30 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/16/2020 13:30:39 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 12/16/2020 14:52:50 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/17/2020 10:07:32 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 12/17/2020 10:07:54 HERMOSA BEACH 4 Administrative BUSN 12/17/2020 10:26:34 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 12/17/2020 17:50:28 HERM BCH 23 911 Calls WPH2 12/18/2020 11:05:02 HERM BCH 71 911 Calls WPH2 12/18/2020 14:59:54 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/18/2020 15:09:02 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/18/2020 16:21:11 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 12/19/2020 02:28:49 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 12/19/2020 16:26:49 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 12/20/2020 23:21:57 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/23/2020 16:27:09 HERM BCH 85 911 Calls WPH2 12/23/2020 19:24:31 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/23/2020 20:56:59 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/25/2020 07:43:11 HMB 16 911 Calls WPH2 12/25/2020 09:42:03 HMB 32 911 Calls WPH2 12/25/2020 16:27:54 HERM BCH 45 911 Calls WPH2 12/26/2020 02:09:44 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/26/2020 05:56:46 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/26/2020 09:42:50 HERM BCH 9 911 Calls WPH2 12/26/2020 12:07:56 HERMOSA BEACH 62 911 Calls VOIP 12/28/2020 10:21:33 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/28/2020 14:35:27 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/28/2020 19:23:13 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/29/2020 05:09:36 HB 79 911 Calls WPH2 12/29/2020 21:57:43 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 12/30/2020 12:19:24 HERM BCH 238 911 Calls WPH2 12/30/2020 18:32:50 HB 38 911 Calls WPH2 12/31/2020 17:53:52 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 Average Call Answer Time (Seconds)18 Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 5 McCormick Ambulance December 2020 Total Number of Dispatched Calls Dispatched Calls Totals Transported 51 Cancelled 35 Grand Total 86 NOTE: None 51, 59% 35, 41% Total Dispatched Calls Transported Cancelled Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 6 Calls per the day of the week Day of the Week Completed Cancelled Total Sunday 7 3 10 Monday 5 5 10 Tuesday 7 3 10 Wednesday 11 5 16 Thursday 7 7 14 Friday 11 6 17 Saturday 3 6 9 Grand Total 51 35 86 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Completed Canceled Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 7 Response by the Time of Day Time of Day Total Response 00:00:00 TO 00:59:59 2 01:00:00 TO 01:59:59 0 02:00:00 TO 02:59:59 3 03:00:00 TO 03:59:59 1 04:00:00 TO 04:59:59 0 05:00:00 TO 05:59:59 0 06:00:00 TO 06:59:59 1 07:00:00 TO 07:59:59 1 08:00:00 TO 08:59:59 3 09:00:00 TO 09:59:59 5 10:00:00 TO 10:59:59 6 11:00:00 TO 11:59:59 4 12:00:00 TO 12:59:59 9 13:00:00 TO 13:59:59 3 14:00:00 TO 14:59:59 5 15:00:00 TO 15:59:59 10 16:00:00 TO 16:59:59 9 17:00:00 TO 17:59:59 2 18:00:00 TO 18:59:59 2 19:00:00 TO 19:59:59 5 20:00:00 TO 20:59:59 7 21:00:00 TO 21:59:59 3 22:00:00 TO 22:59:59 4 23:00:00 TO 23:59:59 1 Grand Total 86 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 00:00:00 TO 00:59:5901:00:00 TO 01:59:5902:00:00 TO 02:59:5903:00:00 TO 03:59:5904:00:00 TO 04:59:5905:00:00 TO 05:59:5906:00:00 TO 06:59:5907:00:00 TO 07:59:5908:00:00 TO 08:59:5909:00:00 TO 09:59:5910:00:00 TO 10:59:5911:00:00 TO 11:59:5912:00:00 TO 12:59:5913:00:00 TO 13:59:5914:00:00 TO 14:59:5915:00:00 TO 15:59:5916:00:00 TO 16:59:5917:00:00 TO 17:59:5918:00:00 TO 18:59:5919:00:00 TO 19:59:5920:00:00 TO 20:59:5921:00:00 TO 21:59:5922:00:00 TO 22:59:5923:00:00 TO 23:59:59Time of Day Responses Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 8 Response Times Within Allowable Time Delayed Response Cancelled Total Code 3: Response Time of 8:59 or less 12 5 0 17 Code 2: Response Time of 15:00 or less 34 0 0 34 Cancelled Responses 0 0 35 35 Grand Total 46 5 35 86 Submitted by Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 9 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0099 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 APPROVAL OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION’S RECOMMENDATION TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BEACH VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION’S (SCVA) BEACH VOLLEYBALL EVENTS TO THE 2021 SPECIAL EVENT CALENDAR ON MARCH 27, APRIL 10 AND MAY 8-9 (Community Resources Manager Kelly Orta) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Parks,Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission’s recommendation to include the addition of the Southern California Beach Volleyball Association’s (SCVA)beach volleyball events to the 2021 Special Event Calendar on the following days: 1.Saturday, March 27; 2.Saturday, April 10; and 3.Saturday, May 8-Sunday, May 9. Executive Summary: The City of Hermosa Beach is a highly sought-after destination for special events,especially those taking place on the beach.The Community Resources Department is tasked with overseeing these event requests and permits following an extensive review and approval process that includes both the Parks,Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission (Commission)as well as City Council,depending on the Impact Level of each event.Impact Level III events,which are the largest in overall impact to the City,require a public hearing by the Commission and City Council for formal approval. At the Commission’s meeting on February 2,it recommended for approval the inclusion of the Southern California Beach Volleyball Association’s (SCVA)beach volleyball events to the 2021 Special Event Calendar on March 27, April 10 and May 8-9. Background: In 2017,the Special Event Policy Guide was implemented,outlining an updated approval process for special events consistent with each event’s categorized impact level.Impact Level III events,which are the events with the largest impact to the City,and new events to Hermosa Beach require review City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0099 are the events with the largest impact to the City,and new events to Hermosa Beach require review and approval by City Council through Public Hearing deliberations.Impact Level II events are approved by the Parks,Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and Impact Level I events are approved by staff.Impact Level III events are given priority review and approval followed by Impact Level II and Impact Level I events at a subsequent Commission meeting. Staff received a request from the Southern California Beach Volleyball Association (SCVA)to hold a series of beach volleyball events on the beach volleyball courts located north of the Pier.Since these events would be new to Hermosa Beach,they require a public hearing deliberation by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and City Council for formal approval. The Commission approved the inclusion of this event on the 2021 Special Event Calendar ( Attachment 1) at its regular meeting on February 2. Although applications have been collected and staff is proceeding with the approval process with very little certainty on what would be allowed to take place in 2021,SCVA event producers have been made aware that the issuance of a final event permit would depend on the Los Angeles County Health Order available at the time of their event(s).In other words,SCVA may be granted formal approval to hold its events in Hermosa Beach,but the City may cancel an event if it is not allowed to take place consistent with COVID-19 precautionary measures. Discussion: SCVA desires to hold its junior and collegiate volleyball tournaments on the volleyball courts north of the Pier on the following dates: ·Saturday, March 27; ·Saturday, April 10; and ·Saturday, May 8-Sunday, May 9. The event requests for March and April are youth qualifier events for the USAV Nationals and the May dates would be a collegiate pairs event.Each event expects up to 80 participants and 80 spectators. Estimated event and permit fees payable to the City are included in Table 1 below: Table 1: SCVA Estimated Event Fees FEE COST CALCULATION TOTAL Application Fee (non -refundable) $463.50 --- $463.50 Category I Fee $2 per participant 80 participants X 3 events $480 Amplified Sound Permit $171 --- $171 Parking $1.25/$1.50 per hour, per space 3 spaces x 4 days $186 TOTAL $1 ,300.50 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0099 FEE COST CALCULATION TOTAL Application Fee (non -refundable) $463.50 --- $463.50 Category I Fee $2 per participant 80 participants X 3 events $480 Amplified Sound Permit $171 --- $171 Parking $1.25/$1.50 per hour, per space 3 spaces x 4 days $186 TOTAL $1 ,300.50 Approval of this event does not conflict with other Impact Level II event requests or holidays.Some of the event dates are concurrent with other events scheduled within the City;however,Staff has no concerns and does not anticipate conflict as the events are planned for different locations and/or different times. Additional event details are included in its Special Event Application (Attachment 2). General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: Governance Element Goal 5. Small beach town character is reflected throughout Hermosa Beach. Policies: ·5.7 Visitor and resident balance.Recognizing the desire and need to balance visitor-serving and local-serving uses as a key to preserving character and the economic vitality of the community. Parks & Open Space Element Goal 3. Community parks and facilities encourage social activity and interaction. Policies: ·3.1 Community-friendly events.Encourage,permit,and support community group,nonprofit, City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0099 ·3.1 Community-friendly events.Encourage,permit,and support community group,nonprofit, or business organized events on City property that support physical activity,beach culture, and family-friendly social interactions. ·3.2 Social and cultural events.Design and program parks and open space to accommodate unique social and cultural events to foster connectedness and interaction. ·3.4 Balance space needs.Balance the space needs and demand on public resources of formal and informal events. Goal 7.The beach offers high quality recreational opportunities and amenities desired by the community. ·7.3 Recreational asset.Consider and treat the beach as a recreational asset and never as a commercial enterprise. ·7.5.Designated recreational uses.Continually evaluate and explore devoting certain portions of the beach to different preferred recreational uses while providing access for all users and meeting the recreation needs of visitors and residents. Fiscal Impact: If approved, estimated event revenue would be approximately $1,300.50. Attachments: 1.2021 Tentative Special Event Calendar 2.SCVA Beach Events Special Event Application Respectfully Submitted by: Kelly Orta, Community Resources Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™ TENTATIVE SPECIAL EVENTS CALENDAR MARCH-DECEMBER 2021 City of Hermosa Beach Community Resources Department 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0280 hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov Updated 1.25.2021 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier 7 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 15 16 17 18 19 Hearts of Hermosa Community Center (Setup) 20 Hearts of Hermosa Community Center 21 Hearts of Hermosa Community Center (Teardown) 22 23 24 25 26 27 SVCA Beach Events Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 28 CBVA Tournament Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 29 30 31 MARCH 2021 Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Long Term Agreement City Hosted or City Contracted Event Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 Hope Chapel Annual Easter Egg Hunt Valley Park 4 Hope Chapel Sunrise Service Pier Plaza Easter Sunrise Mass South Side of the Pier Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier 5 6 7 8 9 10 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier SVCA Beach Events Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 11 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 12 13 14 15 16 17 CBVA Tournament Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 18 19 20 21 22 23 Surfer’s Walk of Fame Kick-off Party (Community Theatre) 24 Surfer’s Walk of Fame Spyder Surf Fest Pier Plaza 25 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 26 27 28 29 30 APRIL 2021 Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Long Term Agreement City Hosted or City Contracted Event Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 Endless Summer Classic Car Show Pier Plaza AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 2 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 3 4 5 6 7 8 Pets in the Park Valley Park PENDING APPROVAL SVCA Beach Events Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 9 SVCA Beach Events Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 10 11 12 13 14 15 CBVA Tournament Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 16 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 17 18 19 20 21 22 Best Day Foundation Beach Day South of Pier PENDING APPROVAL 23 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier Best Day Foundation Beach Day South of Pier PENDING APPROVAL 24 25 26 27 28 Fiesta Hermosa Downtown (Setup) 29 Fiesta Hermosa Downtown 30 Fiesta Hermosa Downtown CBVA Tournament Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 31 Fiesta Hermosa Downtown CBVA Tournament Volleyball Courts - North of Pier MAY 2021 Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Long Term Agreement City Hosted or City Contracted Event Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier 6 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier 7 8 9 10 11 Triathlon North of Pier (Setup) Fine Arts Festival Community Center (Setup) PENDING APPROVAL 12 Triathlon North of Pier (Setup) Fine Arts Festival Community Center PENDING APPROVAL 13 Triathlon North of Pier Fine Arts Festival Community Center PENDING APPROVAL 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Nothing Weekend 26 Nothing Weekend 27 Nothing Weekend 28 29 30 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier (Setup) JUNE 2021 Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Long Term Agreement City Hosted or City Contracted Event Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier (Setup) 2 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier (Setup) 3 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier (Setup) 4 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier (Setup) 5 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier (Setup) 6 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier (Setup) 7 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 8 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 9 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 10 AVP Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 11 AVP Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 12 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier (Teardown) 13 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier (Teardown) 14 AVP Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier (Teardown) Shakespeare by the Sea Valley Park PENDING APPROVAL 15 JVA & BVCA National Beach Championships Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier Shakespeare by the Sea Valley Park PENDING APPROVAL 16 JVA & BVCA National Beach Championships Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 17 JVA & BVCA National Beach Championships Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 18 JVA & BVCA National Beach Championships Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 19 JVA & BVCA National Beach Championships Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 20 JVA & BVCA National Beach Championships Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 21 AAU Jr. National Beach Volleyball Championships Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 22 AAU Jr. National Beach Volleyball Championships Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 23 AAU Jr. National Beach Volleyball Championships Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 24 AAU Jr. National Beach Volleyball Championships Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 25 AAU Jr. National Beach Volleyball Championships Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 26 West Coast AAU Jr. Olympic Games Volleyball Courts - North &South of Pier (Setup) 27 West Coast AAU Jr. Olympic Games Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 28 West Coast AAU Jr. Olympic Games Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 29 West Coast AAU Jr. Olympic Games Volleyball Courts - North & South of Pier 30 31 Smackfest Volleyball Tournament Volleyball Courts - South of the Pier JULY 2021 Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Long Term Agreement City Hosted or City Contracted Event Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 CBVA Tournament Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 2 3 4 5 6 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 7 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 8 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 9 10 11 12 13 14 CBVA Tournament Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 15 CBVA Tournament Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 16 17 18 19 20 21 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier 22 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Long Term Agreement City Hosted or City Contracted Event AUGUST 2021 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 Fiesta Hermosa Downtown (Setup) 4 Fiesta Hermosa Downtown CBVA Tournament Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 5 Fiesta Hermosa Downtown CBVA Tournament Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 6 Fiesta Hermosa Downtown 7 8 9 10 11 Best Day Foundation Beach Day South of Pier PENDING APPROVAL 12 Best Day Foundation Beach Day South of Pier PENDING APPROVAL 13 14 15 16 17 Movies at the Beach South of Pier (Setup) PENDING APPROVAL 18 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier Movies at the Beach South of Pier PENDING APPROVAL 19 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier Hope Chapel Church Picnic Valley Park 20 21 22 23 24 Movies at the Beach South of Pier (Setup) PENDING APPROVAL 25 Movies at the Beach South of Pier PENDING APPROVAL 26 27 28 29 30 SEPTEMBER 2021 Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Long Term Agreement City Hosted or City Contracted Event Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier Walk to End Alzheimer’s Pier Plaza & Strand - North of the Pier 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier Pumpkins in the Park Edith Rodaway Park PENDING APPROVAL 17 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Skechers Pier to Pier Friendship Walk Strand - North of Pier 25 26 27 28 29 30 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier 31 Beach Tennis Tournament Beach Tennis Courts - North of Pier Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Long Term Agreement City Hosted or City Contracted Event OCTOBER 2021 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Veterans Day Commemoration and Candlelight Ceremony Community Center 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Community Menorah Lighting Pier Plaza 29 30 Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Long Term Agreement City Hosted or City Contracted Event NOVEMBER 2021 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 Sand Snowman Contest North of Pier Tree Lighting Ceremony Pier Plaza 5 AAU Southern Pacific Grand Prix Series Volleyball Courts - North of Pier 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 New Years Eve Celebration Pier Plaza Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Long Term Agreement City Hosted or City Contracted Event DECEMBER 2021 Off-Season Monthly Events (Labor Day – Memorial Day) # of Special Event Days # of Days Available (out of 15) January 0 15 February 0 15 March 8 7 April 8 8 May (through May 30) 11 4 September (from September 7) 7 8 October 7 8 November 3 12 December 3 12 Peak Season (Memorial Day: May 31, 2020 – Labor Day: September 6, 2020) Level I & II Event Days (max. of 40) Level III Event Days (max of 30) City Sponsored/Contracted (not on Level III Event Days) Total # of Event Days (out of 70 total) Long Term Agreements (not on Level III Event Days) 1 31 2 46 15 Page 1 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 2021 City of Hermosa Beach Special Event Application Rules and Regulations City of Hermosa Beach Community Resources Department 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone: 310.318.0280 Ɣ Email: hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov Please refer to the Special Event Policy Guide on the City website for a complete listing of all policies and procedures related to special events in the City of Hermosa Beach. Application, application fee and all required documents must be submitted to the Department of Community Resources to be considered. Please note: 9 Applications MUST be completed electronically – handwritten applications will not be accepted. 9 ALL sections and pages of the application MUST be completed (or marked N/A) to be eligible for review. You will be notified by City staff if your application was not accepted due to it being incomplete. Approval Process Event Level Approval Group Event Review Schedule Impact Level I Approved by Community Resources Staff As received Impact Level II Approved by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission Meets monthly (first Tuesday of each month) Impact Level III & New Events Approved by public hearing at the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and City Council Commission meets monthly (first Tuesday of each month) City Council meets bi-monthly (second and fourth Tuesday of each month) Multiple Events If you are applying for multiple event days and ALL characteristics of each day are the SAME (set-up, parking requests, etc.), you are welcome to submit one application and one application fee that includes all event dates. If there are any details that differ between event dates, please submit a SEPARATE application and application fee for each. Example: A youth volleyball organization is holding a variety of tournaments, including: x May ± youth tournament (80 participants, 10 volleyball courts) x June ± youth tournament (80 participants, 10 volleyball courts) x July ± adult tournament (100 participants, 16 volleyball courts) The May and June events may be completed on one application; the July event is required to be submitted on a separate application since it is larger in participants and utilization of volleyball courts. Page 2 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 YOU MUST SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING: To avoid processing delays of your application, do not leave any sections blank. Indicate items that do not apply with an N/A. Attach additional sheets to the application if more space is required. Completed Application (ALL pages – blank pages marked NA) Application Fee x Submit non-refundable application fee; $873 for commercial groups, $582 for non-profit organizations, and $291 for pass-through events, to the City of Hermosa Beach. Applications received without the application fee will not be reviewed and will be returned as incomplete. o If your event was cancelled in 2020 due to COVID-19, the City is offering a 50% reduction to the application fee for 2021 special events. The reduced application fees would be: $463.50 for commercial groups (50% off $873), $291 for non-profit organizations (50% off $582 and $145.50 (50% off 291) for pass-through events. Site Plan x Include location of stages, tents, portable toilets, dumpsters, registration areas, fencing, barricades, bleachers, generators and all other items for your event. Facilities, equipment placement, parking needs, ingress and egress routes and street closure requests must also be included. The City may require a certified Traffic Control Plan (TCP) should your event be approved. Please note that completion of the Beach Usage Map (p. 14) does not qualify as a site plan for beach events. Proof of Non-Profit Status Pending status does not qualify. Non-profit organizations must apply under their own name and not borrow the non-profit status of another entity. Non-Profit Designation Letter Current Copy of Form 990 AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned representative, have read the rules and regulations with reference to this application and am duly authorized by the organization to submi t this application on its behalf. The information contained herein is complete and accurate. Signature of Applicant Date November 7, 2020Mark Paaluhi Page 3 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 2021 City of Hermosa Beach Community Resources Department COMMERCIAL AND NON-PROFIT SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION 710 PLeU AYeQXe Ɣ HeUPRVa Beach, CA 90254 Ɣ 310.318.0280 ORGANIZATION & EVENT INFORMATION EVENT TITLE: Applicant Name: Birthdate: Organization Name: Non-Profit? ☐No ☐Yes Non-Profit I.D. or Tax Exempt #: If non-profit, please describe who will benefit from funds raised from your event: Address: City State Zip Phone: Cell: Email Address: Fax: **1st CHOICE EVENT DATE(S): Set-Up Date(s): Event Date(s): Clean-Up Date(s): If applicable, please provide a brief explanation detailing a necessity for holding your event during the date(s) listed above: **2nd CHOICE EVENT DATE(S): Set-Up Date(s): Event Date(s): Clean-Up Date(s): If applicable, please provide a brief explanation detailing a necessity for holding your event during the date(s) listed above: **PLEASE NOTE: Date choice is not guaranteed until final calendar has been determined by City staff. EVENT DATE: PERMIT NUMBER: DATE STAMP STAFF INITIALS Mark Paaluhi Southern California Volleyball Association # 95-3450010 1928 Hermosa ave Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310-927-1288 Mark@Dayatthebeachevents.com SCVA Southern California Volleyball Association 310-927-1288 03/08/1971 SCVA Beach events March 27, April 10, May 15 & 16 March 27, April 10, May 15 & 16 March 27, April 10, May 15 & 16 March 27, April 10, May 15 & 16 Page 4 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 Please deVcUibe \RXU RUgaQi]aWiRQ¶V e[SeUieQce producing similar events to the one described on this application: POeaVe deVcUibe \RX aQd/RU \RXU RUgaQi]aWiRQ¶V affiOiaWiRQ ZiWh Whe CiW\ Rf HeUPRVa Beach: REQUIRED: CONTACT PERSON ON THE DAY OF THE EVENT: Name: Cell: PRE-EVENT CONTACT PERSON’S INFORMATION (IF DIFFERENT FROM CONTACT INFORMATION ON PREVIOUS PAGE) Name: Birthdate: Address: City State Zip Phone: Cell: Email Address: Fax: Please describe your personal experience producing similar events: EVENT INFORMATION Is this a NEW or RETURNING special event to Hermosa Beach? ☐ NEW ☐ RETURNING -If this is a returning event, please indicate the number of years held in Hermosa Beach: Please indicate your event level (please mark all that apply) ☐ Local ☐ Regional ☐ National ☐ Championship ☐ Qualifier Event Type (please select all that apply): ☐ Race (run, walk, bike, etc.) ☐ Tournament Type: ☐ Parade ☐ Pass-Through ☐ Street Fair/Festival ☐ Fundraiser Benefitting: ☐ Concert ☐ Swim Event ☐ Other PLEASE COMPLETE A DAILY BREAKDOWN OF EVENT-RELATED ACTIVITIES. PLEASE USE MULTIPLE LINES TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN DIFFERENT DAILY ACTIVITIES. PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS, IF NECESSARY. Date(s) Daily Activity Start Time End Time Ƒ Load-in/set-XS Ƒ EYeQW da\ Ƒ LRad-out/Clean-up Ƒ LRad-in/set-XS Ƒ EYeQW da\ Ƒ LRad-out/Clean-up Ƒ LRad-in/set-XS Ƒ EYeQW da\ Ƒ LRad-out/Clean-up Ƒ LRad-in/set-XS Ƒ EYeQW da\ Ƒ Load-out/Clean-up I have been hosting these events in Hermosa for the past 8 years. I am a resident and assist the city in various levels as a resident and event promoter Mark Paaluhi Mark Paaluhi Mark@Dayatthebeachevents.com over 30 years in the sport of beach volleyball playing and hosting events Beach Volleyball 0600 March 27, April 10 0600 May 14, 15 & 16 0600 310-927-1288 03/08/1971 1928 Hermosa ave Hermosa Beach California 90254 310-927-1288 1800 1800 1800 1800 Page 5 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 Event Location: If your event is on the beach, do you plan to remove any volleyball or beach tennis courts? ☐ YES ☐ NO If YES, please indicate which courts will be removed on the Beach Usage Map (p. 14) Estimated # of Participants: Age of Participants: Estimated # of Spectators (daily): Total Estimated Attendance: Marketing & Advertisement Plan Please list how you plan to advertise & promote your event for participants: Please list how you plan to advertise & promote your event for spectators: Overall Event Description - Briefly explain event and activities: Street Closure Information ± For Parades, Races, Walk/Runs, etc.taking place on City streets. Names of Streets to be closed (please include additional sheets if necessary): between and am/pm to am/pm between and am/pm to am/pm between and am/pm to am/pm between and am/pm to am/pm between and am/pm to am/pm Description of Event Route (official map must be submitted with application) Assembly Area/Event Start: Disbanding Area/Event End: Sponsors List ALL proposed/anticipated Co-Sponsors. Each Co-sponsor is a $293 each and must be approved by the Community Resources Department. Co-sponsors may sample only, not sell. 80 80 160 N/A Junior event qualifier for the USAV National Championships. May 14-16 college pairs championships N/A N/A Northside Hermosa Beach Pier on the beach volleyball courts 10-23 website N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 6 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 Parking Will you need reserved parking spaces? ☐ Yes ☐ No If YES, please list requested parking times for each day of request (attach additional sheets if necessary): # of Spaces Date from to # of Spaces Date from to # of Spaces Date from to Will official event merchandise be sold at the event (Business License required)? ☐ Yes ☐ No Does your event involve the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages? Alcohol is prohibited on the beach per HBMC 12.26.300 ☐ Yes ☐ No Will the event have amplified sound? ☐ Yes ☐ No -If YES, please describe (live music, PA, number and size of speakers, microphone, bullhorn, etc): Is this a fundraising event? ☐ Yes ☐ No -If YES, please describe the fundraising activities: Will there be any fenced areas? ☐ Yes ☐ No -If YES, please describe: Will there be construction of stages or structures, including any tents or awnings? ☐ Yes ☐ No -If YES, please describe: What is your clean-up plan post event? Will you be requesting street banners? ☐ Yes ☐ No Will you be requesting light pole banners? ☐ Yes ☐ No Will you be filming or having television coverage? ☐ Yes ☐ No 0600 3 March 23, April 10 0600 3 May 14-16 0600 2 speakers for announcements and background music 3- 10x10 pop up tents staff to walk area and pick up trash and dispose. 1800 1800 1800 Page 7 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 Entrance or Registration Fee: Methods of Registration (please check all that apply): ☐ Website ☐ Mail ☐ Active.com ☐ Other Prizes (including anticipated cash prizes): SAFETY/SECURITY/VOLUNTEERS Have you hired a security company to handle security arrangements for this event? ☐ Yes ☐ No -If YES, please include the following information: Company Name: Phone: # of Guards: Guard Schedule: Do you plan on utilizing volunteers? ☐ Yes ☐ No -If YES, please describe: Please describe your procedures for both crowd control and internal security: EVENT PROMOTION INFORMATION Please describe marketing and promotional efforts for this event. Include event website, social networking sites, radio play, etc. keep clear pathways for foot traffic and Emergency vehicles. N/A medals $50 per team Page 8 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 EQUIPMENT INFORMATION (ATTACH SITE PLAN) A DIAGRAM OF YOUR SITE PLAN THAT INCLUDES ALL FACILITIES, EXACT PLACEMENT OF ALL EQUIPMENT, STREET CLOSURES, INGRESS AND EGRESS ROUTES, SHUTTLE ROUTES, FENCING, ACCESSIBILITY PLAN, AND PARKING MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION. YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOUT A SITE PLAN (PLEASE NOTE: THE COMPLETION OF THE BEACH USAGE MAP, PAGE 14, DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A SITE PLAN) Please check all the boxes that apply to the equipment that will be on site for your event and specify the number and size of each (if applicable). ☐ Cars ☐ Porta Potties ☐ Semi-Trucks ☐ Motor Homes ☐ Generator Size: Size/Type: ☐ Trailer ☐ Vans Size: Size: ☐ Stage ☐ Sound Equipment Measurements: ☐ Enclosed Tents ☐ Canopies ☐ Other (please attach list with description of each item) ACCESSIBILITY PLAN IW LV Whe aSSOLcaQW¶V UeVSRQVLbLOLW\ WR cRPSO\ ZLWh aOO CLW\, CRXQW\, SWaWe aQd FedeUaO dLVabLOLW\ acceVV UeTXLUePeQWV applicable to the event, including the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). All indoor and outdoor sites, activities and programs must be accessible to persons with disabilities. Please describe your accessibility plan: INSURANCE Unless greater or lesser coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa Beach evidence of $2 million comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, including endorsement, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees as additionally insured. Permittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees, for fees or damages caused, arising out of or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICANT’S LAWS AND AGREES TO MAINTAIN PREMISES IN GOOD CONDITION AND RETURN IN THE SAME CONDITION AS BEFORE SAID USE. I certify that the information contained herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have read and agree to comply with the City of Hermosa Beach Sustainability Measures. All fees, charges and other material will be paid and or furnished to the Department of Community Resources as mutually agreed to by both parties. Name/Company Representative Signature Date 3k watt 2- speakers 3- 10x10 pop up tent Mark Paaluhi 11/07/2020 clear pathways to the sand will be available clear pathways to the sand will be available clear pathways to the sand will be available clear pathways to the sand will be available clear pathways to the sand will be available clear pathways to the sand will be available clear pathways to the sand will be available clear pathways to the sand will be available Page 9 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 Event Name: Event Date(s): 3+ Years SMALL 100-500 PARKS OR BEACH WINTER WEEKDAY 1- 2 DAYS 1-2 EVENTS PER YEAR NONE MEDIUM 501-2,000 ONCE BEFORE PIER PLAZA SPRING OR FALL WEEKEND 3-4 DAYS 3-4 EVENTS PER YEAR 1-2 LARGE 2,000+ NEW EVENT STREETS/ PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY/ STRAND SUMMER HOLIDAY MORE THAN 5 DAYS MORE THAN 5 EVENTS PER YEAR 3 OR MORE Select one characteristic in each ROW as it relates to your event(s). Please be sure to mark (L.e. ³[´, cLUcOe, checNPaUN, etc.) each selection. Failure to do so will deem the worksheet and application incomplete. NUMBER OF EXPECTED PARTICIPANTS REOCCURANCE LOCATION TIME OF YEAR DAY(S) OF THE WEEK NUMBER OF CONSECUTIVE DAYS NUMBER OF EVENTS IN ONE YEAR ADDITIONAL REQUESTS NEEDED i.e. filming, reserved parking, fencing, stage or seating construction, road closures, amplified sound, etc. TOTALS Calculate the total number of each color/column selected. IMPACT LEVEL I At least 5 blue IMPACT LEVEL II At least 2 red IMPACT LEVEL III At least 2 green Determine Impact Level by selecting the HIGHEST your event qualifies for. IMPACT LEVEL IMPACT CHARACTERISTIC WORKSHEET (REQUIRED FOR ALL EVENTS) Please consider details of your event and use this worksheet to determine its impact level. If you are applying for multiple events, please complete a different page for each if the event details are different. Event Name: Event Date(s): SCVA Beach Events Jan 23, Feb 13, March 27, April 10, May 14-16 2 X X X X 4 5 1 x X X X X X Page 10 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 COMMUNITY BENEFIT Please provide a brief description of the benefit your event(s) add to the community. The Community Decision-Making Tool may be used as a guide and can be found on the City website at the following link: http://www.hermosabch.org/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=5226 Event Name: Event Date(s): PUBLIC RELATIONS INFORMATION Please provide the following information to be given out to the general public, if requested: Name of Event: Name of Organization: Event Dates and Times: Date Times Event Information can be found online at: Public Relations Contact: Day Phone: Evening Phone: Email: Please provide a brief description of your event that can be used on the online City calendar. Please include details that would be helpful for someone looking for more information specific to your event. SCVA Beach Volleyball 1/23,2/13,3/27,4/10,5/14-16 SCVA of USAV provides family oriented beach volleyball events. It provides a positive social economic and economic impact to the city of Hermosa Beach. SCVA of USAV Beach events SCVA/ Day at the Beach Events 1/23,2/13,3/27,4/10,5/14-16 0800-1600 N/A Mark Paaluhi 310-927-1288 Mark@Dayathebeachevents.com SCVA Junior event qualifier for USAV Nationals 1/23,2/13,3/27,4/10,5/14-161/23,2/13,3/27,4/10,5/14-161/23,2/13,3/27,4/10,5/14-161/23,2/13,3/27,4/10,5/14-16 0800-1600 0800-1600 0800-1600 0800-1600 Page 11 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 PRELIMINARY FEE WORKSHEET Please complete, to the best of your ability, all event-related fees as it pertains to your proposed event, even if you are requesting fee waivers. A final total of charges will be determined thirty days prior to your event once approval is granted; additional fees not listed below may apply when deemed necessary by staff as a result of the final event planning and implementation. Please note that fees may be updated at any time. EVENT CATEGORY FEES PRICE (subject to change) CALCULATION TOTAL Category I x Less than 500 people Non-profit: $2 per person Commercial: 70/30 split of registration Category II x Impacts public areas for no longer than one (1) day including set-up & tear-down x Is conducted in the off-season (not between Memorial Day and Labor Day or on any holiday) x Participant plus Spectator crowd above 500 but does not exceed 3,000 people. x Has no television coverage (except news). x A non-profit entity is the beneficiary of the net revenues (100%). x Does not meet any of the identifying criteria for a Category III or IV event. $2,778 per day Category III x Impacts public areas for more than one (1) day including set up. x Participant plus Spectator crowd does not exceed 5,000 people. x Has no television coverage (except news). x Has more than $3,000 and less than $50,000 in prize money. x Does not meet any of the identifying criteria for a Category IV event. $3,056 per day Category IV x Meets Category III Criteria and has one or more of the following: Has network television coverage or Estimated participant/spectator crowds exceed 5,000 people or Prize money in excess of $50,000 or Charges admission to spectator Gross revenues in excess of $50,000. $5,556 per day MISCELLANEOUS FEES PRICE (subject to change) CALCULATION TOTAL Commercial Application Fee - non-refundable $873 ($463.50 if your event was cancelled in 2020 due to COVID-19) Non-Profit Application Fee - non-refundable $582 ($291 if your event was cancelled in 2020 due to COVID-19) Pass-Thru Application Fee - non-refundable $291 ($145.50 if your event was cancelled in 2020 due to COVID-19) Amplified Sound Permit $171 Pier Plaza Use Fee $11,631 per day Event Co-Sponsor $293 each Event Set-Up/Tear-Down $263 per location, per day Community Resources Staff $349 per day Parking Meter Space Fee $1.25 per hour (8am-8pm) $1.50 per hour (8pm-8am) *Preliminary TOTAL *Depending on event details additional fees may apply due to required staffing and/or services from the City of Hermosa Beach¶s Building Division, Public Works Department and the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Page 12 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 GREEN MATRIX (Environmental Protection Plan) (Required for all event applications) Events in Hermosa Beach are expected to implement measures to reduce impacts and costs to the environment, the city, and the community. Specify how you will comply with applicable measures (or mark not applicable). If you have a multi-year contract for your event, please show how you will increase compliance in subsequent years. Event Name: Expected Attendance: MEASURE CHECK IF APPLICABLE HOW WILL YOU COMPLY? (use additional sheets if needed) Recycling and Waste Reduction 1. Reduce waste and single-use items Limit single-use paper, plastics, packaging, and décor items ☐ Reduce size/bulk of plates, containers, cups ☐ Use products with high recycled content ☐ Avoid sale or give-away of single-use plastic drinking water bottles. *A mobile water cart ('Mother-Lode Wide') is available for use and reusable water bottles are encouraged ☐ Provide free drinking water in large dispensers (people can refill their own bottles, or use paper cups) *Large drink dispensers are available for use and reusable water bottles are encouraged ☐ At 'beer or drink gardens' use recycled or compostable cups (provide dump station for liquids) ☐ Recycle fry-grease for bio-diesel fuels ☐ Limit and reduce size of handouts, flyers and give-aways (print several per page, double-side, do not use dark color inks) ☐ 2. Recycling containers: Place well-marked recycle containers adjacent to every trash container ☐ Provide onsite 'monitors' directing people to recycling at prime locations or provide secondary trash sorters. ☐ Scavenging is prohibited from waste containers. Prevent and report scavenging ☐ 3. Staging Recycle or reuse event construction materials ☐ UVe µQR ePLVVLRQ/QR VOC¶ SaLQWV/VeaOaQWV ☐ SCVA Beach Events 160 Page 13 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 3. Transportation No-idling policy for all vehicles ☐ Sponsor free shuttle or low-cost bus passes ☐ Use electric, hydrogen, hybrid or CNG vehicles ☐ 4. Energy Use energy-efficient lighting ☐ Turn lighting and devices off when not in use ☐ Turn off generators when not in use for significant period of time ☐ Using alternative energy (solar, wind, fuel cell) to supply some power ☐ Use alternative fuel generators (CNG, fuel cell, biodiesel) (biodiesel- minimum B20 (20% blend); B99 is preferred) ☐ 5. Marine environment NO single-use plastic bags starting October 1, 2016. ☐ including take-out cups or containers. ☐ No hosing of surfaces. Consult Public Works regarding clean-up procedures for large events ☐ Full containment of all wastes ☐ Full containment of all six-pack plastic rings. Cut rings prior to disposal. ☐ If Beach and street cleaning required consult Public Works regarding clean-up procedures ☐ 6. Education Event and vendors to make reducing waste and recycling a prominent theme ☐ Provide one booth, kiosk or space for green education sponsored by city or designee ☐ Advertise green measures and rules in all event advertising and on website ☐ Demonstrate that vendors and service providers will comply with green measures ☐ 7. Monitoring Report on compliance with above applicable measures ☐ Page 14 of 14 Revised 10/21/2020 BEACH COURTS USAGE MAP (required for all BEACH events.) Please circle the beach volleyball and/or beach tennis courts that you will be using for your event. This also includes those courts that may be removed for event-related activities. If you are applying for multiple events or multiple days where a different number of courts will be used, please complete a separate page for each, specifying the event title and date below. Completion of this map does not take the place of the required Site Plan. Event Name: Event Date(s): SCVA Beach Volleyball 1/23,2/13,3/27,4/10,5/14-16 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0101 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 CONSIDERATION OF THE ALLOCATION OF APPROXIMATELY $63,073 OF FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS FOR ADA RELATED SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS, AND TO CONSIDER RE- ALLOCATION FROM PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CDBG FUNDED PROJECTS TO A NEW PROGRAM TO PROVIDE GRANTS TO ELIGIBLE SMALL BUSINESSES TO ASSIST IN THEIR RECOVERY FROM THE PANDEMIC (Continued from January 26, 2021) (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions to: 1.Allocate the FY 2021-22 CDBG Budget towards the FY 2022-23 project for ADA related sidewalk improvement projects; and 2.Allocate $110,000 of CDBG funds towards the small business grant assistance program to assist local businesses in recovering from the Pandemic by: a.Reallocating $37,479 of COVID-19 CV (Coronavirus)funds from a previously identified project for hands free equipment at City Hall; and b.Allocating $72,521 in unspent funds accumulated from previous year’s allocations. Background: City Council continued consideration of this report to the February 9, 2021 meeting for staff to consider new funding allocation options and how they affect prior commitments. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)Program is authorized under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974.The primary objective of Title I is to develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing,a suitable living environment,and expanding economic opportunities,principally for low-and moderate-income persons.The CDBG program, funded by the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD),offers communities opportunities to compete nationally for funds to implement program activities that best meet the needs of their communities,in accordance with the national objectives and requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0101 CDBG program. The pandemic has created a one-time opportunity to re-direct funds previously allocated for other eligible projects to a local business assistance program administered by the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA). The Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA)administers CDBG funding on behalf of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors,which oversees LACDA for the County and 48 participating cities. The CDBG Program has three primary objectives: 1.Benefit those with low- and moderate-income; 2.Aid in preventing neighborhood deterioration; and 3.Meet other urgent community development needs due to natural disasters or other emergencies. LACDA works closely with diverse communities and elected representatives to assess local needs and identify funding priorities.LACDA then contracts with local agencies and organizations to provide funding for the needed services.Community Development staff works closely with the Public Works Department staff to identify and recommend eligible projects. Discussion: The following summarizes available funding and staff’s recommendations: Funds Available Description Proposed Action $97,533 Unspent funds accumulated from previous years allocations for ADA sidewalk projects Reallocate $72,521 of unspent funds to the Small Business Grant Program; the remaining balance of $25,012 will continue to be allocated for ADA sidewalk projects. $37,479 COVID-19 CV funds received from the CARES ACT; Previously allocated toward the hands-free restrooms in City facilities Reallocate $37,479 of COVID - 19 CV funds to the Small Business Grant Program. $63,073 Anticipated FY 2021-22 Allocation Approve FY2021-22 allocation being applied to a FY 2022-23 project. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0101 FundsAvailable Description Proposed Action$97,533 Unspent funds accumulated fromprevious years allocations for ADAsidewalk projects Reallocate $72,521 of unspentfunds to the Small BusinessGrant Program; the remainingbalance of $25,012 will continueto be allocated for ADA sidewalk projects. $37,479 COVID-19 CV funds received from the CARES ACT; Previously allocated toward the hands-free restrooms in City facilities Reallocate $37,479 of COVID - 19 CV funds to the Small Business Grant Program. $63,073 Anticipated FY 2021-22 Allocation Approve FY2021-22 allocation being applied to a FY 2022-23 project. LADCA recently allowed the use of COVID-19 CV funds ($37,479)and the unspent funds from previous years ($97,533)to finance local small businesses in their pandemic recovery efforts,with a grant assistance program.This opportunity was not available at the time prior funding decisions were made by City Council.In June 2020,the City passed Resolution No.20-7248 approving the use of the COVID-19 CV funds to install and retrofit automatic door openers with touchless buttons at existing restrooms at the City community center and bring them up to ADA standards.As of February 2021, the project has not been approved by LACDA. The small business grant assistance program is a one-time opportunity that would offer a maximum amount-not-to-exceed $10,000 to Hermosa Beach businesses that create or retain jobs for low-and moderate-income persons.LACDA would be administering the grant,selecting businesses,executing agreements,and issuing checks to business owners on behalf of the City.It would be the City’s responsibility to reach out to businesses eligible to apply for the grant. Staff recommends allocating $110,000 toward the grant program that would offer $10,000 grants to 11 eligible Hermosa Beach businesses.This requires Council to authorize the use of $37,479 COVID -19 CV funds and $72,521 of unspent prior year allocations for the small business grant assistance program. The anticipated FY 2021-22 allocation of $63,073 is not eligible for allocation to the small grant assistance program and therefore staff recommends that these funds be combined with the remainder of the unspent prior year allocation of $25,012 and the future CDBG funding for a future sidewalk improvement project.LACDA’s administrative deadlines require City Council approval of the FY 2021-22 CDBG allocation amount and adoption of the FY 2021-22 budget before the start of the applicable Fiscal Year.LACDA has estimated that the City’s FY 2021-22 allocation will be approximately $63,073.Staff recommends applying the FY 2021-22 allocation towards an ADA sidewalk improvement project in FY 2022-23. General Plan Consistency: The proposal to re-allocate funding for local business assistance is consistent with the following Goal 6 in the Governance Element and the following policies contained therein: ·6.1 Long-term economic development.Support the development and implementation of long- term economic development strategies that seek to establish and keep new businesses and a strong middle class in Hermosa Beach over the decades to come.· ·6.7 Retail base.Encourage economic development reflective of the character of Hermosa Beach with small and medium scale retail development within Hermosa Beach in order to City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0101 Beach with small and medium scale retail development within Hermosa Beach in order to create a stronger tax base and increase the City’s tax revenue. Continued funding for ADA upgrades to the City’s sidewalks is consistent with Goal 2 of the Infrastructure element, and the following specific policy: ·2.4 Sidewalk Improvements.Consider innovative funding strategies,such as cost-sharing, ADA accessibility grants,or sidewalk dedications,to improve the overall condition,safety,and accessibility of sidewalks. Fiscal Impact: Approving the use of CDBG COVID-19 CV supplemental funds and unspent prior year allocations to fund the small business grant program would allow the City to provide grants to eligible small businesses to assist in their recovery from the pandemic with no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. Combining the balance of unspent funds with current and future year CDBG allocations would help provide an economy of scale for sidewalk improvement projects and improve network mobility. Pooling these allocations provides for more strategic planning and funding. Attachments: 1.Draft Resolution Approving FY 2021-22 Budget 2.Draft Resolution Approving Funds for the Small Business Grant Program 3.Small Business Grant Program Information Respectfully Submitted by: Melanie Emas, Assistant Planner Concur: Andrew Nguyen, Assistant Engineer Concur: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Concur:Marnell Gibson, Director of Public Works Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™ 1 RESOLUTION NO. 21-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 ALLOCATION AMOUNT OF APPROXIMATELY $63,073 AND ALLOCATION OF APPROXIMATELY $63,073 OF FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS FOR SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS IN FISCAL YEAR 2022-23. The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The Los Angeles County Development Authority staff has estimated that the City’s CDBG allocation for the 2021-2022 Fiscal Year will be approximately $63,073. SECTION 2. The City Council, pursuant to applicable law, held a duly noticed public hearing on February 9, 2021 to consider the proposed CDBG allocation and budget and consider a project utilizing funds from the foregoing CDBG allocation, at which hearing testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Council. SECTION 3. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby: 1. Approves the FY 2021-2022 CDBG allocation of approximately $63,073; and 2. Approves the proposed CDBG program budget for the 2021-22 Fiscal Year to be applied toward the FY 2022-23 CDBG project; SECTION 4. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, shall cause the original of the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the minutes of the City Council meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of February, 2021 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 2 _____________________________________________________________________ PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ______________________________ City Clerk City Attorney Page 1 of2 RESOLUTION NO. 210-XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ESTIMATED REVENUE OF APPROXIMATELY $37,479 IN SUPPLEMENTAL FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG-CV) FUNDING FROM THE CARES ACT AND $72,521 OF UNSPENT ALLOCATIONS FROM PREVIOUS YEARS IN FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 AND APPROPRIATE $37,479 IN THE CDBG FUND TO SUPPORT LOCAL AND STATE PANDEMIC RESPONSE FOR ACTIVITIES THAT PREPARE, PREVENT AND RESPOND TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, INSTALLING AND RETROFITTING AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENERS WITH TOUCHLESS BUTTONS AT EXISTING RESTROOMS AT THE CITY COMMUNITY CENTER AND BRINGING THEM UP TO ADA STANDARDS; AUTHORIZING USE OF CDBG FUNDS FOR CONTRACTORS, AND GRANTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AUTHORITY TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, IF DETERMINED TO BE NECESSARYTO PROVIDE GRANTS TO ELIGIBLE SMALL BUSINESSES TO ASSIST IN THEIR RECOVERY FROM THE PANDEMIC. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA) staff has estimated that the City's supplemental Federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG-CV) funding from the CARES Act for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 will be approximately $37,479. SECTION 2. The City Council, pursuant to applicable law, held a duly noticed public hearing on June February 9, 2020 to consider reallocate the proposed CDBG-CV allocation and budget and consider a project utilizing funds from the foregoing CDBG-CV allocationand a portion of the City’s unspent previous allocation towards the LACDA Small Business Grant Program, at which hearing testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Council. SECTION 3. The Annual Planning Summary serves as a conceptual planning and implementation guide for the City and County. Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Supplemental CDBG-CV Annual Planning Summary would allow the City to receive a supplemental allocation of approximately $37,479 and authorize staff to proceed with a project to install and retrofit automatic door openers with touchless buttons at existing restrooms at the City Community Center and bringing them up to ADA standards. This project is an eligible activity and meets the following two Federal goal(s)/objective(s): Goal 3. Special Needs/Non-Homeless: A non-housing activity or facility which provides services exclusively to individuals with special needs who are not homeless or at risk of homelessness and includes accessibility improvements to sidewalks (e.g. curb cuts and uplifted panels) and public facilities (e.g. parks, city halls, etc.). Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Indent: First line: 0" Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Indent: Left: 0" Page 2 of2 Goal 11. Public Facilities The primary intent of this activity is the construction or rehabilitation of a building structure that contains a public use except for the general conduct of government. (This activity can include ancillary and peripheral activities, such as parking lot improvements, sidewalk approaches related to the construction or rehabilitation of the structure or facility) (Note: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements to all public use buildings are allowed, including those that are used for the general conduct of government.) SECTION 34. Based on the foregoing, which supersedes City Council Resolution No 20-7248, the City Council hereby: 1. Approves $110,000 of CDBG funds towards to the small business grant assistance program for assisting local businesses in recovering from the Pandemic by: a. Reallocating $37,479 of COVID-19 CV from a previously identified project for hands free equipment at City Hall; 1. Reallocating $72,521 in unspent funds accumulated from previous years allocationApproves the estimated revenue of approximately $37,479 in supplemental Federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG-CV) funding from the CARES Act in FY 2020-2021 and appropriates $37,479 in the CDBG Fund; and b. 2. Approves the proposed CDBG-CV supplemental program budget for the 2020-2021 Fiscal Year and instructs staff to submit the CDBG-CV Program Planning Summary for approval to the Los Angeles County Development Authority; and 3. Authorizes staff to adjust the program budget as necessary to take into account the final CDBG-CV allocation from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and any amounts remaining unspent at the close of the Fiscal Year; and 4. Directs staff to submit the required documentation for approval to the Los Angeles County Development Authority; and 5. Approves the use of funds to support local and state pandemic response for activities that prepare, prevent and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic such as the installation and retrofitting of automatic door openers with touchless buttons at existing restrooms at the City Community Center and bringing them up to ADA standards; and 6. Authorizes the use of CDBG-CV supplemental funds for a construction contractor and a Contract/Labor Compliance Officer to provide direct project related services including but not limited to construction management and inspections, if determined to be necessary; and 7. Grants the Public Works Director authority to submit a notice of completion once work is complete. SECTION 45. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the original of the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the minutes of the City Council meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Indent: First line: 0" Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.75", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: -0.18" + Indent at: 0.08" Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: Justified, Indent: Left: 0.81", Don't add space between paragraphs of the same style, Line spacing: Multiple 1.15 li, Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: -0.18" + Indent at: 0.08", Widow/Orphan control, Adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Adjust space between Asian text and Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.81", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: -0.18" + Indent at: 0.08" Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.5" + Indent at: 0.75" Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.5" + Indent at: 0.75" Formatted: Space Before: 0 pt Formatted: Space Before: 0 pt, Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.5" + Indent at: 0.75" Formatted: Space Before: 0 pt Formatted: Space Before: 0 pt, Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.5" + Indent at: 0.75" Formatted: Space Before: 0 pt Formatted: Space Before: 0 pt, Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.5" + Indent at: 0.75" Formatted: Space Before: 0 pt Formatted: Indent: Hanging: 0.44", Space Before: 0 pt, Tab stops: Not at 0.95" + 0.95" Page 3 of2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 923thrd day of JuneFebruary, 20210. ____________________________________________________________________________ PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ _____________________________ City Clerk City Attorney 1 Small Business Grant Assistance Program Information Following the success of the initial offering of the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA)/City Small Business Grant Assistance Program, the LACDA is pleased to offer this again to our CDBG Participating Cities. LACDA will administer the program on behalf of participating cities who will direct their own outreach to direct the grant funds exclusively to their local businesses. Six cities participated in Round 1 and 65 businesses have received grants to sustain their operations during this pandemic. Several cities have expressed interest in providing this program again and we are ready to finalize commitments of CDBG and/or CDBG-CV funds to open this again to your business communities. The LACDA SBG Program will offer a maximum amount-not-to-exceed $10,000 to businesses that either provides goods and services to residents in a low- and moderate- income service area (LMA) or to businesses that create or retain jobs for low- and moderate-income persons (LMJ). The grant funds can be used for operational expenses of the business such as: • Employee payroll; • Working capital to continue operations; • Payment of outstanding business expenses; and • Adaptive practices needed to remain open (i.e. equipment and supplies for physical distancing). Eligible Businesses • Small Businesses with less than 500 employees impacted by COVID-19; • Restaurants, coffee shops, bakeries, cafés, gastropubs, salons, barbers and other grooming businesses, gyms, day spas, and fitness studios; • Retail and commercial stores such as local markets, consumer goods, electronics, appliances, health and sporting goods, furniture, clothing and shoes, books, and music stores; • Active business license in the City or County, as applicable; • No unresolved City, municipal, or health code violations; • Business in continuous operation in the City for at least two years; and • Not on the attached list of ineligible businesses. Participating cities can use available CDBG-CV and unallocated CDBG funds for the SBG Program. A separate Exhibit A must be developed for each funding source and require a 5-day public noticing period. The goal or number of businesses assisted will be based on the amount a city allocates to the program and fulfillment of the public benefit standards based on the specified national objective. LACDA will provide website and flyers each city will adapt to identify this as their program. A link will be provided to include on your website where local businesses can complete a pre-screening form to request grant funds. The application period will be 2 open for 5 days to ensure that eligible businesses have a reasonable opportunity to submit their initial application. After the 5-day period, a lottery will be conducted and selected businesses will be requested to complete a comprehensive application form. The LACDA will work with the selected businesses for each participating city to execute an agreement and issue checks to business owners. LACDA City Small Business Grant Program Ineligible Businesses - Any national chain that is not locally franchised - Massage parlors and bail bond services - Corporate-owned fast-food restaurants (franchisees are eligible, as stated in prior Eligible Business Section) - Check cashing, bars, liquor stores, smoke/cannabis shops, firearms retailers, pawnshops - Non-profit organizations - Real estate salespersons - Financial businesses primarily engaged in the business of lending, such as banks, finance companies - Passive businesses owned by developers and landlords that do not operate an active business or occupy the assets acquired, improved, or operated with the grant proceeds (except Eligible Passive Companies under § 120.111) - Life insurance companies - Businesses located in a foreign country (businesses in the U.S. owned by aliens may qualify) - Pyramid sale distribution plans. (i.e. Amway, Herbalife, Mary Kay) - Businesses deriving more than one-third of gross annual revenue from legal gambling activities - Businesses engaged in any illegal activity - Private clubs and businesses which limit the number of memberships for reasons other than capacity - Government-owned entities (except for businesses owned or controlled by a Native American tribe) - Businesses principally engaged in teaching, instructing, counseling or indoctrinating religion or religious beliefs, whether in a religious or secular setting - Loan packagers earning more than one-third of their gross annual revenue from packaging SBA loans - Businesses with an Associate who is incarcerated, on probation, on parole, or has been indicted for a felony or a crime of moral turpitude - Businesses in which the participating city or LACDA, or any of its Associates owns an equity interest - Multi-national or publicly traded businesses are not eligible for this program - Adult businesses which: (1) Present live performances of a prurient sexual nature; or 3 (2) Derive directly or indirectly more than de minimis gross revenue through the sale of products or services, or the presentation of any depictions or displays, of a prurient sexual nature - Business or owner listed on the Federal Excluded Parties List (EPLS) maintained on www.sam.gov - Business that does not have an active business license showing the business address is located in the participating city - Business that has any active City, municipal or health code violations (open, unresolved code cases, etc.) - Business owner that is the subject of unresolved findings of noncompliance related to previous Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assistance City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0106 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING PORTIONS OF AND CLARIFYING THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON RESIDENTIAL EVICTIONS TO COMPORT WITH RECENT CHANGES IN STATE LAW AND SETTING FORTH THE FACTS CONSTITUTING SUCH URGENCY (City Attorney Michael Jenkins) (Assistant City Attorney Lauren Langer) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that City Council Adopt an Urgency Ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach to extend portions of and clarify the temporary moratorium on residential evictions to comport with recent changes in state law and setting forth the facts constituting such urgency (Attachment 1). The urgency ordinance requires four-fifths vote of the city council and if approved, will take effect immediately. Executive Summary The City Council will consider updating the City’s temporary residential eviction moratorium to comport with the passage of Senate Bill 91 (SB 91)and extending the local eviction protections to be coterminous with state law through June 30, 2021, through adoption of an urgency ordinance. Background: On January 29,2021,Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill 91 (SB 91),immediately enacting the “COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act”(“the Act”).The Act augments AB 3088 from last year and extends some of its time limits to provide additional rental debt relief and protections to residential tenants and small landlords/homeowners.Most significantly,the Act extends the state’s residential eviction moratorium from January 31, 2021 to June 30, 2021 and creates a State Rental Assistance Program. Summary of Proposed Ordinance Changes: 1.Clarifying that for the period of time October 1,2020,through June 30,2021,tenants shall follow the preconditions for eviction protection under the Act to receive eviction protection, which include providing a declaration of hardship to their landlords within 15 days of receipt of an eviction notice and payment of partial rent (25%of all rent that came due from October 1, City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0106 an eviction notice and payment of partial rent (25%of all rent that came due from October 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021). 2.Clarifies that state rental protection program may offer rental forgiveness for low-income tenants and that additional protections may also be available under state law during the local moratorium period. 3.Extends the local residential eviction moratorium through June 30,2021 to be coterminous with the state law.The local protections prohibit a residential landlord from terminating a residential tenancy in order to demolish or substantially remodel the property until the landlord obtains all permits necessary to commence the work. 4.Makes other minor clarifications to comport with SB 91. Background of Residential Eviction Protections for Failure to Pay Rent Due to the COVID-19 Emergency On March 4, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom declared a State of Emergency to address the global pandemic caused by a respiratory disease which has been named “COVID-19”. On March 15, 2020, the Mayor of City, declared a state of local emergency. At a special meeting on March 16, 2020, the City Council approved and ratified the declaration of local emergency. On March 24, 2020, the City passed an Urgency Ordinance, which instituted an eviction moratorium covering nonpayment of rent due to COVID-19 retroactive to March 16, 2020 for commercial and residential tenants. To prevent a wave of evictions and piecemeal regulations throughout the state, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 3088 (“AB 3088”) on August 31, 2020. The bill, which took immediate effect, enacted the COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act of 2020 (“Act”) to provide statewide eviction protections for residential tenants experiencing a financial hardship relating to COVID-19. AB 3088, among other things, prohibited residential tenants from being evicted for failure to pay rent due to a COVID-19- related hardship occurring between March 1 and January 31, 2021. Since Hermosa Beach had a local eviction moratorium in place through the end of September, tenants could rely on local protection through the end of September. However, the most prudent course of action would be to also comply with state procedures for the month of September if the landlord requested. Among those requirements was the obligation to pay at least 25% of the total deferred rent that came due September 1, 2020 through January 31, 2021 no later than January 31, 2021. AB 3088 also prevented extensions of local residential eviction moratoria and set their repayment periods. To reflect AB 3088’s effects on the City’s local ordinance, on September 22, 2020, City Council adopted an Urgency Ordinance (Ordinance No. 20-1417U) to clarify provisions of the moratorium on residential evictions to reflect state law. Namely, the ordinance clarified that the City’s local moratorium on residential evictions for nonpayment of rent due to COVID-19 would end September City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 2 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0106 30, 2020. For purposes of educating the public, the ordinance explained the requirements for eviction protection under state law, including the return of COVID-19 hardship declarations to landlords and partial payment of deferred rent. As required by state law, the September ordinance also set the City’s six-month repayment period for COVID rental debt as October 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. The state law did not allow the City to change those dates. Senate Bill 91 - 2021 Statewide Eviction Moratorium On January 29, 2021, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill 91 (SB 91), immediately enacting the “COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act” (“the Act”). The Act augments AB 3088 and extends some of its time limits to provide additional rental debt relief and protections to residential tenants and small landlords/homeowners. Most significantly, the Act extends the state’s residential eviction moratorium from January 31, 2021 to June 30, 2021 and creates a State Rental Assistance Program. Tenant Relief Act The requirements to qualify for eviction protection remain largely the same.The Act continues to prohibit residential tenants from being evicted for failure to pay rent due to a COVID-19-related hardship occurring between March 1 and August 31,2020,provided that the tenant timely returns a written declaration of hardship to the landlord.(Note:Hermosa Beach tenants were also protected under the local ordinance for that time period as well). The Act now gives tenants more time to pay COVID-19 rental debt under the state protections.Under AB 3088,residential tenants experiencing COVID-19-related hardships between September 1,2020 and January 31,2021 were protected from eviction provided they paid at least 25%of the rent due during this period.The new state law extends this period to June 30,2021,allowing tenants five more months to come up with the 25%minimum rent payment.This extension also means that nonpayment of rent that came due between March 1,2020 through June 30,2021 (formerly January 31,2021)cannot ever be grounds for eviction for tenants who comply with the Act’s preconditions for protection (timely returning signed hardship declarations and paying at least 25%of rent owed between September 1,2020 and June 30,2021).If a residential tenant fails to take the steps needed to qualify for eviction protection by June 30,2021,the landlord may file an unlawful detainer action to evict the tenant as early as July 1, 2021 under the state law. Though ambiguously worded,the Act suggests that cities may again adopt residential tenant protections for non-payment of rent starting July 1,2021.We will monitor the state law and report back on any extensions of the schedule in the state law,or any renewed authorization to regulate locally.Until then,the Act prevails over and preempts provisions of any existing local residential eviction moratorium that would interfere with the Act’s rental payment requirements for rent that came due or will come due between March 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021. Additionally,while the City provided a six-month repayment period prior to AB 3088 and SB 91,the City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 3 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0106 Additionally,while the City provided a six-month repayment period prior to AB 3088 and SB 91,the state law now provides longer to repay rent than the local moratorium did.So,tenants and landlords should be aware of state law procedures for eviction protection (timely returning signed hardship declarations and paying at least 25%of rent owed between September 1,2020 and June 30,2021 upon request from landlord). State Rental Assistance Program A notable difference from AB 3088 is the Act’s creation of the State Rental Assistance Program funded by federal appropriations.The Program allows landlords of low-income tenants or the tenants themselves to apply for rental assistance,prioritizing rent in arrears over prospective rent.If a landlord applies,the landlord may receive 80%of unpaid rental debt accumulated from April 1,2020 through March 31,2021.To receive payment,the landlord must give up the right to evict an eligible tenant based on COVID-19 rental debt (rent that came due from March 1,2020 through June 30, 2021).If a landlord declines to participate in the Program,the tenant can apply,but will only receive up to 25%of unpaid rental debt accumulated from April 1,2020 through March 31,2021.The mechanics on how the Program will be administered are still being developed and the County of Los Angeles will most likely implement the program.The City will release information for the public as more information becomes known. To conform to the new law,staff recommends a few minor amendments to the eviction moratorium ordinance,as described in the beginning of this report.A redline (Attachment 2)and clean copy of the ordinance are provided to show the changes to the ordinance (Attachment 1). Additional Local Eviction Protections On December 8,2020,the City adopted an urgency ordinance (Urgency Ordinance No.20-1422U) that amended the temporary moratorium on residential evictions to prohibit residential landlords from terminating a residential tenancy in order to demolish or substantially remodel the property unless and until the landlords obtain all permits necessary to commence the work.The ordinance does not prevent landlords from evicting tenants from residential property if they want to demolish or substantially remodel;it merely changes the sequence of steps needed before they may do so. “Substantially remodel”is defined by the ordinance to mean,to make a modification of the property that requires a permit from the City.The ordinance applies to tenancy termination notices,and eviction notices,and unlawful detainer actions based on such notices,served or filed on or before December 8,2020;but,where the time to vacate the property has not passed.Ordinance No.20- 1422U expired on January 31,2021.On January 26,2021,the City Council extended the duration of this protection through March 31,2021.The City now seeks to extend the duration of this protection through June 30, 2021 to reflect the duration of the new residential eviction moratorium under SB 91. Fiscal Impact: City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 4 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0106 There is no anticipated direct fiscal impact from this ordinance. The City of Hermosa Beach initially incurs all costs related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, but will submit requests for cost recovery to the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) reimbursement. Attachments: 1.CLEAN: Urgency Ordinance No. 21-XXXX to extend and clarify the temporary moratorium on residential evictions to comport with state law and setting forth the facts constituting such urgency. 2.REDLINE: Urgency Ordinance No. 21-XXXX to extend and clarify the temporary moratorium on residential evictions to comport with state law and setting forth the facts constituting such urgency. 3.Table of COVID-19 related items. Respectfully Submitted by: Lauren Langer, Assistant City Attorney Legal Review: Lauren Langer, Assistant City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 5 of 5 powered by Legistar™ ORDINANCE NO. 21-__U AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXTENDING PORTIONS OF AND CLARIFYING THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON RESIDENTIAL EVICTIONS TO COMPORT WITH RECENT CHANGES IN STATE LAW AND SETTING FORTH THE FACTS CONSTITUTING SUCH URGENCY The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. A. The findings set forth in Ordinance No. 20-1407U, 20-1409U, 20-1414U, 20-1417U, 20- 1420U, and 20-1422U and 21-1425U are still applicable and incorporated herein by reference. B. The City Council desires to prevent the spread of COVID-19, prevent homelessness and avoid displacement during safer at home orders and during the COVID-19 pandemic and to provide clear and limited bases on which a landlord may endeavor to evict a tenant consistent with state law. C. On March 27, 2020 Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-37-20, which provides a 60-day extension for tenants to respond to an eviction complaint based on nonpayment of rent. As another indicator of the critical need for residents to remain at home, this order expressly preserves local authority to enact any public health measure that may compel an individual to remain physically present in any particular residential property. D. On May 13, 2020, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health issued a new Safer at Home Order for Control of COVID-19, which extended the order for people to remain in their residences except for essential business and requires all persons to practice physical distancing of at least six feet apart and wear a cloth face covering whenever they may have contact with people outside their household. On July 4, 2020, given the surge in COVID-19 cases in Los Angeles County, the Department issued a revised order urging residents to remain in their homes as much as practicable. The status of county and state health orders are still evolving daily. E. On June 30, 2020 Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-71-20 extending the authorization for local governments to halt evictions of renters impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic through September 30, 2020. F. On September 1, 2020 Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 3088 (AB 3088), which enacted the COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act of 2020 (“the Act”). Among other things, this law supersedes portions of the City’s temporary moratorium on residential evictions for nonpayment of rent and adopts a moratorium through January 31, 2021 so long as tenants comply with the Act’s requirements. The Act provides specific provisions for cities with existing moratorium ordinances. As a result, the City is restating its urgency ordinance for the purpose of conforming to the new state law. G. Effective November 30, 2020, the County Department of Public Health enacted a new Health Officer Order requesting individuals to remain in their homes as much as possible and to avoid crowding and mingling with non-household members. The Order came after many Americans gathered and traveled over the Thanksgiving holiday in the midst of a winter surge of COVID-19 cases and deaths. According to the County Department of Public Health, daily peaks are now more than double the County’s peak of daily cases during the summer surge. The region is currently experiencing a surge following the winter holiday season. H. With Intensive Care Unit (“ICU”) bed capacity rapidly decreasing throughout California, the Governor of the State of California issued a State Regional Stay at Home Order on December 3, 2020, that would trigger greater restrictions on a region consisting of multiple counties depending on that region’s ICU hospital bed availability. Once a region has less than 15 percent ICU availability, all counties within the region are required to follow the State Regional Stay at Home Order within 24 hours for at least three weeks. The Southern California Region, which the City of Hermosa Beach is a part of, was at zero percent ICU capacity on January 15, 2021. I. On January 5, 2021, the State Public Health Officer issued a new order directing counties with 10 percent or less of ICU capacity under the Regional Stay at Home Order where the regional ICU capacity is at 0 percent, to prioritize services to those who are the sickest and cancel or reschedule elective surgeries. The order is intended to reduce pressure on strained hospitals, and redistribute the responsibility of medical care across the state so patients can continue to receive lifesaving care. J. On January 25, 2021, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) ended the Regional Stay at Home Order, lifting the order for all regions statewide, including Southern California. This action allowed all counties to return to the Blueprint for a Safer Economy framework which uses color-coded tiers to indicate which activities and businesses can open based on local case rates and test positivity. Los Angeles County is in the strictest tier, the Purple Tier. K. On January 29, 2021, Governor Newsom signed SB 91 (COVID -19 Tenant Relief Act, “the Act”) to amend and replace AB 3088, extending the statewide residential eviction moratorium to June 30, 2021. The Act keeps in place the same requirements tenants must follow to receive eviction protections, but extends certain time limits of AB 3088. It also creates a State Rental Assistance Program that would offer landlords of lower income tenants payment for back-rent. L. The situation is unprecedented and evolving rapidly. Further economic impacts are anticipated, leaving tenants vulnerable to eviction. News reports have cited a UCLA study last year, which determined that as many as 449,000 people in L.A. County could face eviction due to the economic slump caused by the COVID -19 pandemic and tenants' inability to pay rent. M. The intent of this Ordinance is to extend the existing deadlines for the existing local residential eviction moratorium through June 30, 2021, and to comport with recent changes in state law. N. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the City's police powers and powers afforded to the City in the time of a national, state, county and local emergency during an unprecedented health pandemic, such powers being afforded by the State Constitution, State law and HBMC Chapter 2.56 to protect the peace, health, and safety of the public. The Hermosa Beach City Council finds that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety of residents living within the City and finds urgency to approve this ordinance immediately based on the facts described herein and detailed in the staff report. Under Government Code Section 8634, this ordinance is necessary to provide for the protection of health, life and property. SECTION 2. The Temporary Moratorium on Evictions for Non-Payment of Rent by Residential Tenants Impacted by the COVID-19 Crisis, as most recently amended in Urgency Ordinance No. 21-1425U is clarified as needed to comport with state law and restated in full as follows: A. With respect to residential evictions for non-payment of rent due to financial impacts from COVID-19, the following applies: 1. The “repayment period” for deferred rent that came or will come due between March 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020, inclusive, is October 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. 2. For the period of time of March 16, 2020 through September 30, 2020 (the “local moratorium period”), no residential landlord shall endeavor to evict a tenant for nonpayment of rent, if the tenant demonstrates that the tenant is unable to pay rent due to financial impacts related to COVID-19, subject to subparagraphs (a) and (b) below. A landlord shall not commence an eviction during the six months after the end of the local moratorium period, so long as the tenant pays rent in a timely manner after the local moratorium period and is repaying the past due rent that accrued during the local moratorium period. A landlord may not charge or collect a late fee or interest for rent that is delayed for the reasons stated in this Paragraph 2. The parties may agree in writing to a longer repayment plan or reduced rental obligation in accordance with the “Act”. (a) A landlord who knows that a tenant cannot pay some or all of the rent temporarily due to financial impacts related to COVID-19 shall not serve a notice pursuant to CCP 1161(2), file or prosecute an unlawful detainer action based on a 3-day pay or quit notice, or otherwise seek to evict for nonpayment of rent. A landlord knows of a tenant’s inability to pay rent within the meaning of this ordinance if the tenant, within 30 days after the date that rent is due, notifies the landlord in writing of lost income and inability to pay full rent due to financial impacts related to COVID-19, and provides documentation or an explanation within 30 days of the notice to support the claim. For purposes of this ordinance, “in writing” includes email or text communications to a landlord or the landlord’s representative with whom the tenant has previously corresponded by email or text. Any medical or financial information provided to the landlord shall be held in confidence, and only used for evaluating the tenant’s claim. (b) For purposes of this Paragraph 2, “financial impacts related to COVID-19” include, but are not limited to, tenant lost household income as a result of any of the following: (1) being sick with COVID-19, or caring for a household or family member who is sick with COVID-19; (2) lay-off, loss of hours, or other income reduction resulting from business closure or other economic or employer impacts of COVID-19; (3) compliance with a recommendation from a government health authority to stay home, self-quarantine, or avoid congregating with others during the state of emergency; (4) extraordinary out-of-pocket medical expenses; or (5) child care needs arising from school closures related to COVID-19. (c) Other legal remedies available to landlords are not affected by this Paragraph 2. (d) These protections in Paragraph 2 pre-dated AB 3088 and SB 91. State law may provide additional protections against eviction for nonpayment of rent due to financial impacts related to COVID-19 during this local moratorium period. 3. For the period of time of October 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021, tenants shall follow the preconditions for eviction protection under the Act to receive eviction protection, which include providing a declaration of hardship to their landlords within 15 days of receipt of an eviction notice and payment of partial rent (25% of all rent that came due from October 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 ). Tenants shall repay the remaining rent due by the end of the repayment period unless earlier forgiven by landlords through the State Rental Assistance Program created by the Act. 4. Landlords are encouraged to offer payment plans to tenants, and any agreement between landlord and tenant to allow longer repayment periods or reduced rental obligations shall be i n compliance with the Act. 5. Upon mutual written agreement of landlord and tenant, a tenant may draw down on a security deposit at any time to pay back rent. This provision does not authorize landlords to apply a security deposit to satisfy COVID-19 rental debt, as the term is defined by the Act, absent the aforementioned mutual written agreement. 6. In accordance with the Act, tenants that comply with the terms of this ordinance have a defense from eviction and the corresponding rental obligations will not be deemed past due until the close of the repayment period set out above. 7. For the period of December 8, 2020 through June 30, 2021, no residential landlord shall terminate a tenancy to demolish or substantially remodel the residential real property unless and until the landlord secures all permits necessary to perform the work. For purposes of this Section, “substantially remodel” means to make a modification of the property that requires a permit from the City. This ordinance shall apply to tenancy termination notices, notices to quit and other eviction notices, and the unlawful detainer actions based on such notices, served or filed on or before December 8, 2020; but, where the time to vacate the property has not passed. (a) To the extent applicable, landlords must provide relocation assistance and satisfy other requirements in accordance with the Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (Cal. Civil Code § 1496.2) for a no-fault just cause eviction. (b) No other legal remedies available to landlords are affected by this Paragraph 7. . SECTION 3. In order to prevent inconsistencies, the Director of Emergency Services may suspend the effectiveness of any provision in this ordinance in the event that the President of the United States, Congress, Governor of the State of California or California State Legislature or other body with jurisdiction adopts an order or legislation that similarly prohibits evictions and foreclosures for failure to pay rent by individuals impacted by the COVID-19 crisis. SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance is found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 5. Environmental Review. The City Council finds that adoption and implementation of this ordinance is not a “project” for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as that term is defined by CEQA guidelines (Guidelines) sections 15061(b)(3), and 15378(b)(5). The effect of the proposed amendment will be to maintain the status quo and extend the existing urgency ordinance for an additional period of time. No new development will result from the proposed action. No impact to the physical environment will result. The City Council also alternatively finds that the adoption and implementation of this ordinance is exempt from the provisions of CEQA as an administrative activity by the City of Hermosa Beach, in furtherance of its police power, that will not result in any direct or indirect physical change in the environment, per sections 15061(b)(3), and 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, as well as CEQA Guidelines section 15064(e) (economic regulations). SECTION 6. Urgency Declaration; Effective Date. The City Council finds and declares that the adoption and implementation of this ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation and protection of the public peace, health and safety as detailed above and as the City and public would suffer potentially irreversible displacement of commercial and residential tenants resulting from evictions for failure to pay rent during the COVID-19 crisis. During this local emergency, and in the interest of protecting the public health and preventing transmission of COVID-19, it is essential to avoid unnecessary housing displacement, to protect the City’s affordable housing stock, and to prevent housed individuals from falling into homelessness, especially given state and county directives to stay at home. Promoting stability amongst commercial tenancies is also conducive to public health, allowing businesses to follow the advice and directives of public health officials to close and allowing employees to avoid public contact during times of a public health crisis without fear of imminent eviction or foreclosure. Loss of income as a result of COVID-19 may inhibit City residents and businesses from fulfilling their financial obligations, including payment of rent. This ordinance reflects the statewide approach to residential eviction protection, while maintaining important and impactful local provisions. This urgency ordinance is needed during the emergency in the interest of protecting the public health and preventing transmission of COVID-19, to avoid unnecessary housing displacement, to protect the City’s affordable housing stock, and to prevent housed individuals from falling into homelessness, especially given state and county directives to stay at home. Under Government Code Section 8634 and HBMC Chapter 2.56, this ordinance is necessary to provide for the protection of life and property for the reasons set out herein. The Council therefore finds and determines that the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and protection of life and property, require that this Ordinance be enacted as an urgency ordinance pursuant to Government Code section 36937 and take effect immediately upon adoption by four-fifths of the City Council. SECTION 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be published or posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of February 2021. ____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk (seal) Date: _______________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. 21-__U AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXTENDING PORTIONS OF AND CLARIFYING THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON RESIDENTIAL EVICTIONS TO COMPORT WITH RECENT CHANGES IN STATE LAW AND SETTING FORTH THE FACTS CONSTITUTING SUCH URGENCY The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. A. The findings set forth in Ordinance No. 20-1407U, 20-1409U, 20-1414U, 20-1417U, 20- 1420U, and 20-1422U and 21-1425U are still applicable and incorporated herein by reference. B. The City Council desires to prevent the spread of COVID-19, prevent homelessness and avoid displacement during safer at home orders and during the COVID-19 pandemic and to provide clear and limited bases on which a landlord may endeavor to evict a tenant consistent with state law. C. On March 27, 2020 Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-37-20, which provides a 60-day extension for tenants to respond to an eviction complaint based on nonpayment of rent. As another indicator of the critical need for residents to remain at home, this order expressly preserves local authority to enact any public health measure that may compel an individual to remain physically present in any particular residential property. D. On May 13, 2020, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health issued a new Safer at Home Order for Control of COVID-19, which extended the order for people to remain in their residences except for essential business and requires all persons to practice physical distancing of at least six feet apart and wear a cloth face covering whenever they may have contact with people outside their household. On July 4, 2020, given the surge in COVID-19 cases in Los Angeles County, the Department issued a revised order urging residents to remain in their homes as much as practicable. The status of county and state health orders are still evolving daily. E. On June 30, 2020 Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-71-20 extending the authorization for local governments to halt evictions of renters impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic through September 30, 2020. F. On September 1, 2020 Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 3088 (AB 3088), which enacted the COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act of 2020 (“the Act”). Among other things, this law supersedes portions of the City’s temporary moratorium on residential evictions for nonpayment of rent and adopts a moratorium through January 31, 2021 so long as tenants comply with the Act’s requirements. The Act provides specific provisions for cities with existing moratorium ordinances. As a result, the City is restating its urgency ordinance for the purpose of conforming to the new state law. G. Effective November 30, 2020, the County Department of Public Health enacted a new Health Officer Order requesting individuals to remain in their homes as much as possible and to avoid crowding and mingling with non-household members. The Order came after many Americans gathered and traveled over the Thanksgiving holiday in the midst of a winter surge of COVID-19 cases and deaths. According to the County Department of Public Health, daily peaks are now more than double the County’s peak of daily cases during the summer surge. The region is currently experiencing a surge following the winter holiday season. H. With Intensive Care Unit (“ICU ”) bed capacity rapidly decreasing throughout California, the Governor of the State of California issued a State Regional Stay at Home Order on December 3, 2020, that would trigger greater restrictions on a region consisting of multiple counties depending on that region’s ICU hospital bed availability. Once a region has less than 15 percent ICU availability, all counties within the region are required to follow the State Regional Stay at Home Order within 24 hours for at least three weeks. The Southern California Region, which the City of Hermosa Beach is a part of, was at zero percent ICU capacity on January 15, 2021. I. On January 5, 2021, the State Public Health Officer issued a new order directing counties with 10 percent or less of ICU capacity under the Regional Stay at Home Order where the regional ICU capacity is at 0 percent, to prioritize services to those who are the sickest and cancel or reschedule elective surgeries. The order is intended to reduce pressure on strained hospitals, and redistribute the responsibility of medical care across the state so patients can continue to receive lifesaving care. J. On January 25, 2021, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) ended the Regional Stay at Home Order, lifting the order for all regions statewide, including Southern California. This action allowed all counties to return to the Blueprint for a Safer Economy framework which uses color-coded tiers to indicate which activities and businesses can open based on local case rates and test positivity. Los Angeles County is in the strictest tier, the Purple Tier. K. On January 29, 2021, Governor Newsom signed SB 91 (COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act, “the Act”) to amend and replace AB 3088, extending the statewide residential eviction moratorium to June 30, 2021. The Act keeps in place the same requirements tenants must follow to receive eviction protections, but extends certain time limits of AB 3088. It also creates a State Rental Assistance Program that would offer landlords of lower income tenants payment for back-rent. L. The situation is unprecedented and evolving rapidly. Further economic impacts are anticipated, leaving tenants vulnerable to eviction. News reports have cited a UCLA study last year, which determined that as many as 449,000 people in L.A. County could face eviction due to the economic slump caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and tenants' inability to pay rent. M. The intent of this Ordinance is to extend the existing deadlines for the existing local residential eviction moratorium through June 30, 2021, and to comport with recent changes in state law.. N. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the City's police powers and powers afforded to the City in the time of a national, state, county and local emergency during an unprecedented health pandemic, such powers being afforded by the State Constitution, State law and HBMC Chapter 2.56 to protect the peace, health, and safety of the public. The Hermosa Beach City Council finds that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety of residents living within the City and finds urgency to approve this ordinance immediately based on the facts described herein and detailed in the staff report. Under Government Code Section 8634, this ordinance is necessary to provide for the protection of health, life and property. SECTION 2. The Temporary Moratorium on Evictions for Non-Payment of Rent by Residential Tenants Impacted by the COVID-19 Crisis, as most recently amended in Urgency Ordinance No. 21-1425U is clarified as needed to comport with state law and restated in full as follows: A. With respect to residential evictions for non-payment of rent due to financial impacts from COVID-19, the following applies: 1. The “repayment period” for deferred rent that came or will come due between March 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020, inclusive, is October 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. 2. For the period of time of March 16, 2020 through September 30, 2020 (the “local moratorium period”), no residential landlord shall endeavor to evict a tenant for nonpayment of rent, if the tenant demonstrates that the tenant is unable to pay rent due to financial impacts related to COVID-19, subject to subparagraphs (a) and (b) below. A landlord shall not commence an eviction during the six months after the end of the local moratorium period, so long as the tenant pays rent in a timely manner after the local moratorium period and is repaying the past due rent that accrued during the local moratorium period. A landlord may not charge or collect a late fee or interest for rent that is delayed for the reasons stated in this Paragraph 2. The parties may agree in writing to a longer repayment plan or reduced rental obligation in accordance with the “Act”. (a) A landlord who knows that a tenant cannot pay some or all of the rent temporarily due to financial impacts related to COVID-19 shall not serve a notice pursuant to CCP 1161(2), file or prosecute an unlawful detainer action based on a 3-day pay or quit notice, or otherwise seek to evict for nonpayment of rent. A landlord knows of a tenant’s inability to pay rent within the meaning of this ordinance if the tenant, within 30 days after the date that rent is due, notifies the landlord in writing of lost income and inability to pay full rent due to financial impacts related to COVID-19, and provides documentation or an explanation within 30 days of the notice to support the claim. For purposes of this ordinance, “in writing” includes email or text communications to a landlord or the landlord’s representative with whom the tenant has previously corresponded by email or text. Any medical or financial information provided to the landlord shall be held in confidence, and only used for evaluating the tenant’s claim. (b) For purposes of this Paragraph 2, “financial impacts related to COVID-19” include, but are not limited to, tenant lost household income as a result of any of the following: (1) being sick with COVID-19, or caring for a household or family member who is sick with COVID-19; (2) lay-off, loss of hours, or other income reduction resulting from business closure or other economic or employer impacts of COVID-19; (3) compliance with a recommendation from a government health authority to stay home, self-quarantine, or avoid congregating with others during the state of emergency; (4) extraordinary out-of-pocket medical expenses; or (5) child care needs arising from school closures related to COVID-19. (c) Other legal remedies available to landlords are not affected by this Paragraph 2. (d) These protections in Paragraph 2 pre-dated AB 3088 and SB 91. State law may provide additional protections against eviction for nonpayment of rent due to financial impacts related to COVID-19 during this local moratorium period. 3. For the period of time of October 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021, , tenants shall follow the preconditions for eviction protection under the Act to receive eviction protection, which include providing a declaration of hardship to their landlords within 15 days of receipt of an eviction notice and payment of partial rent (25% of all rent that came due from October 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 ). Tenants shall repay the remaining rent due by the end of the repayment period unless earlier forgiven by landlords through the State Rental Assistance Program created by the Act. 4. Landlords are encouraged to offer payment plans to tenants, and any agreement between landlord and tenant to allow longer repayment periods or reduced rental obligations shall be in compliance with the Act. 5. Upon mutual written agreement of landlord and tenant, a tenant may draw down on a security deposit at any time to pay back rent. This provision does not authorize landlords to apply a security deposit to satisfy COVID-19 rental debt, as the term is defined by the Act, absent the aforementioned mutual written agreement. 6. In accordance with the Act, tenants that comply with the terms of this ordinance have a defense from eviction and the corresponding rental obligations will not be deemed past due until the close of the repayment period set out above. 7. For the period of December 8, 2020 through June 30, 2021, no residential landlord shall terminate a tenancy to demolish or substantially remodel the residential real property unless and until the landlord secures all permits necessary to perform the work. For purposes of this Section, “substantially remodel” means to make a modification of the property that requires a permit from the City. This ordinance shall apply to tenancy termination notices, notices to quit and other eviction notices, and the unlawful detainer actions based on such notices, served or filed on or before December 8, 2020; but, where the time to vacate the property has not passed. (a) To the extent applicable, landlords must provide relocation assistance and satisfy other requirements in accordance with the Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (Cal. Civil Code § 1496.2) for a no-fault just cause eviction. (b) No other legal remedies available to landlords are affected by this Paragraph 7. . SECTION 3. In order to prevent inconsistencies, the Director of Emergency Services may suspend the effectiveness of any provision in this ordinance in the event that the President of the United States, Congress, Governor of the State of California or California State Legislature or other body with jurisdiction adopts an order or legislation that similarly prohibits evictions and foreclosures for failure to pay rent by individuals impacted by the COVID-19 crisis. SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance is found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 5. Environmental Review. The City Council finds that adoption and implementation of this ordinance is not a “project” for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as that term is defined by CEQA guidelines (Guidelines) sections 15061(b)(3), and 15378(b)(5). The effect of the proposed amendment will be to maintain the status quo and extend the existing urgency ordinance for an additional period of time. No new development will result from the proposed action. No impact to the physical environment will result. The City Council also alternatively finds that the adoption and implementation of this ordinance is exempt from the provisions of CEQA as an administrative activity by the City of Hermosa Beach, in furtherance of its police power, that will not result in any direct or indirect physical change in the environment, per sections 15061(b)(3), and 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, as well as CEQA Guidelines section 15064(e) (economic regulations). SECTION 6. Urgency Declaration; Effective Date. The City Council finds and declares that the adoption and implementation of this ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation and protection of the public peace, health and safety as detailed above and as the City and public would suffer potentially irreversible displacement of commercial and residential tenants resulting from evictions for failure to pay rent during the COVID-19 crisis. During this local emergency, and in the interest of protecting the public health and preventing transmission of COVID-19, it is essential to avoid unnecessary housing displacement, to protect the City’s affordable housing stock, and to prevent housed individuals from falling into homelessness, especially given state and county directives to stay at home. Promoting stability amongst commercial tenancies is also conducive to public health, allowing businesses to follow the advice and directives of public health officials to close and allowing employees to avoid public contact during times of a public health crisis without fear of imminent eviction or foreclosure. Loss of income as a result of COVID-19 may inhibit City residents and businesses from fulfilling their financial obligations, including payment of rent. This ordinance reflects the statewide approach to residential eviction protection, while maintaining important and impactful local provisions. This urgency ordinance is needed during the emergency in the interest of protecting the public health and preventing transmission of COVID-19, to avoid unnecessary housing displacement, to protect the City’s affordable housing stock, and to prevent housed individuals from falling into homelessness, especially given state and county directives to stay at home. Under Government Code Section 8634 and HBMC Chapter 2.56, this ordinance is necessary to provide for the protection of life and property for the reasons set out herein. The Council therefore finds and determines that the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and protection of life and property, require that this Ordinance be enacted as an urgency ordinance pursuant to Government Code section 36937 and take effect immediately upon adoption by four-fifths of the City Council. SECTION 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be published or posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of February 2021. ____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk (seal) Date: _______________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ City Attorney 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 1 DATE ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION EXPIRATION DATE March 16, 2020 Resolution No. 20-7230 Confirming the Proclamation of a Local Emergency. Pursuant to Section 5: Pursuant to the authority prescribed by Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2.56.090, the City Council hereby orders as follows (the “Order”), to take effect immediately and remain in effect until March 28, 2020, unless extended by the City Council or City Manager: A. All restaurants, alcohol beverage establishments and snack shops in the City are hereby ordered closed to onsite patronage; provided, however, that take-out orders and delivery of meals are permitted provided that take-out orders are picked up by a single person and the establishment maintains social distance in any necessary queuing of patrons. B. All formal and informal organized and group activities, games and sports, with the exception of family outings, are hereby prohibited in all City parks and the beach; C. The City shall prohibit access to play structures at all City parks; D. The City shall post signs at all City parks advising that: i. COVID-19 is known to survive on various surfaces such as children’s play equipment, bathroom surfaces, tables, benches, railings, and other fixtures, for 72 or more hours; and ii. Park users shall maintain social distance as prescribed by Beach Cities Health District, as provided in Exhibit 1 attached hereto; iii. Park users with symptoms consistent with COVID-19 infection are encouraged to isolate themselves at home and contact their health care provider or, if they do not have a health care provider, the Los Angeles County Department of Health to assist with receiving prompt diagnosis and care. Pursuant to Section 6: A. Commercial landlords in the City are hereby prohibited from (I) charging rent and (II) evicting commercial tenants for nonpayment of rent with respect to tenants whose businesses are subject to the Order or are otherwise limited or closed (voluntarily or by mandate) to prevent or reduce the spread of COVID-19 and who demonstrate lost income and inability to pay rent as a result of such Section 5 requirements: until March 28, 2020, unless extended by the City Council or City Manager. No expiration date set for Section 6 Measures. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 2 limitation or closure. A landlord knows of a tenant’s lost income and inability to pay rent within the meaning of this Order if the tenant, within 30 days after the date rent is due, notifies the landlord in writing of the lost income and inability to pay rent due to a limitation or closure of the tenant’s business related to COVID-19, with appropriate supporting documentation. If a tenant suffers only a partial loss of income, the tenant shall pay the pro-rated share of their rent that corresponds to the income they generated during the period of loss. B. Residential landlords in the City are hereby prohibited from (I) charging rent and (II) evicting residential tenants for nonpayment of rent with respect to tenants whose income is reduced or eliminated as a result of efforts to prevent or reduce the spread of COVID -19 and who demonstrate lost income and inability to pay rent as a result of such loss. A landlord knows of a tenant’s lost income and inability to pay rent within the meaning of this Order if the tenant, within 30 days after the date rent is due, notifies the landlord in writing of the lost income and inability to pay rent due to such loss, with appropriate supporting documentation. If a tenant suffers only a partial loss of income, the tenant shall pay the pro-rated share of their rent that corresponds to the income they generated during the period of loss. March 24, 2020 Urgency Ordinance No. 20-1406U, Temporary Moratorium on Evictions for Nonpayment of Rent by Residential Tenants and Commercial Tenants, and Temporary Suspension on Residential and Commercial Foreclosures This Moratorium replaced the eviction moratorium in Resolution No. 20-7230 May 31, 2020 April 14, 2020 Urgency Ordinance No. 20-1407U, To Amend the Temporary Moratorium on Foreclosures and Evictions Due to Non-Payment of Rent by Residential and Commercial Tenants Impacted by COID-19. Amended the Eviction Moratorium in 20-1406U in its entirety in light of Governor Newsom’s Financial Relief Package announced on March 25, 2020. May 31, 2020 April 22, 2020 City Manager/Director of Emergency Services Executive Order No. 2020-01 Pursuant to Section 2: 1. Cancellation of non-essential large public events, senior and community programs, and limitations on public access to some City facilities (effective March 12, 2020). Shall continue until the earlier to occur of: (1) the conclusion of the local emergency; (2) its termination is ordered by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services; or (3) it is duly terminated 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 3 2. Cancellation of P.A.R.K. After School Program (effective March 13, 2020). 3. Closure of City Hall (effective March 16, 2020). 4. Cancellation of Wednesday Farmers Market (effective March 18, 2020) and Friday Farmers Market (effective March 20, 2020). 5. Business License renewal dates extended to May 31, 2020 (effective March 25, 2020). 6. Parking Permit renewal dates extended to May 31, 2020 (effective March 25, 2020). 7. Parking citation unbilled late fees delayed until May 31, 2020 (effective March 25, 2020). 8. Parking citation DMV holds delayed until May 31, 2020 (effective March 25, 2020). 9. Temporary banner permit requirements waived through May 31, 2020 (effective March 25, 2020). 10. Closure of beach and Strand (effective March 27, 2020). 11. Closure of City parks on Easter Sunday (effective April 9, 2020). *This order was confirmed at the April 28th meeting. by the City Council. The Order may also be superseded by a duly enacted ordinance or order of the City Council expressly superseding this Order. April 27, 2020 City Manager/Director of Emergency Services Executive Order No. 2020-02 Pursuant to section 2: 1. The ten cents ($0.10) per recycled paper carryout bag charged to customers by affected retail establishments provided by Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 8.68.040 is hereby suspended. 2. All restaurants, snack shops and similar businesses that serve food (and, optionally, groceries) and alcohol via delivery, pick-up or drive-thru shall not provide any alcohol to a customer prior to providing the entire food/meal order; i.e. all alcohol shall be provided to the customer concurrently with Shall continue until the earlier to occur of: (1) the conclusion of the local emergency; (2) its termination is ordered by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services; or (3) it is duly terminated by the City Council. The Order may also be superseded by a duly enacted ordinance or order of the City 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 4 the delivery of food. All such establishments shall monitor customers waiting for food to ensure that no one is consuming alcohol on or adjacent to the premises. *This Order was confirmed at the May 12th meeting. Council expressly superseding this Order. May 14, 2020 City Manager/Director of Emergency Services Executive Order No. 2020-03 Pursuant to Section 2: Consistent with the provisions of the County Health Officer’s May 13, 2020 Revised Order, the beach will be open from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. subject to the following: 1. Only the following limited activities are allowed: i. Individual or household ocean activities such as surfing, swimming, kayaking, paddle boarding, and body surfing. ii. Individual or household active recreation and exercise such as walking and running where the participants do not remain in a stationary location. 2. The following activities are prohibited: i. Sunbathing, sitting, lying on the sand and other stationary activities (such as yoga, calisthenics, or meditation). ii. Picnicking. iii. Use of chairs, canopies or coolers. iv. Biking. v. Group or organized sports such as volleyball vi. Gatherings or events. vii. Fishing. 3. Individuals/households must exit the beach immediately after they recreate. 4. All beachgoers must follow the following safety requirements: i. Maintain more than 6 feet physical distance from others at all times (except between members of same household). ii. Wear face coverings, when out of the water and around others (except for children under age 2 and children with breathing problems). 5. All City parks and the beach are closed daily from 9:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Shall continue until the earlier to occur of: (1) the conclusion of the local emergency; (2) its termination is ordered by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services; or (3) it is duly terminated by the City Council. The Order may also be superseded by a duly enacted ordinance or order of the City Council expressly superseding this Order. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 5 6. The Strand and Pier remain closed. 7. City parking facilities are subject to the following regulations, subject to further modification by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services as may be required to maintain public safety and order and to enforce the City’s emergency orders: i. All, or parts of, Lot A, Lot B, Lot C, and Lot D will be closed. ii. Temporary short-term parking spaces will be established in Lot A and Lot D. iii. Monthly permit parking spaces will be provided in Lot D. iv. Temporary parking spaces will be designated at various locations on City streets. 8. Consistent with the provisions of the County Health Officer’s May 13, 2020 Revised Order, all Lower Risk retail Businesses that sell goods and services to the public may only provide these goods and services to the public via curbside, doorside, or other outdoor or outside pickup, or via delivery. Members of the public are not permitted inside a retail Low-Risk Retail Business. Lower Risk Businesses may set up a table or shade structure in a manner to accommodate pickup, provided that patrons practice social distancing as provided in the May 13, 2020 Revised Order and provided that minimum 5-foot clearance is maintained along public walkways. Outdoor display of merchandise is prohibited. 9. In addition to enforcement remedies available to the City as provided in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, emergency executive orders issued by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services and emergency resolutions adopted by the City Council shall be enforceable by way of: i. Imposing an administrative citation pursuant to HBMC Chapter 1.10. ii. Prosecuting a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not to exceed one thousand ($1,000) dollars or by imprisonment for not to exceed six months, or both. *This Order was confirmed during the May 26th meeting as amended by Resolution 7236. May 21, 2020 City Manager/Director of Emergency Services Executive Order No. 2020-04 Pursuant to Section 3. The City Manager and Director of Emergency Services now seeks to extend the duration of the emergency orders listed in Section 5 of Resolution No. 20-7230, as revised and restated below. The following emergency orders are issued effective as of the date set forth below and shall supersede any previous emergency orders inconsistent herewith: The Order may be superseded by a duly enacted ordinance or order of the City Council expressly superseding this Order. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 6 A. All restaurants, alcohol beverage establishments and snack shops in the City are hereby ordered closed to onsite patronage; provided, however, that (i) take-out orders and delivery of meals are permitted, provided that take-out orders are picked up by way of a drive-through window or by a single person and the establishment maintains social distance in any necessary queuing of patrons, and (ii) outdoor dining will be permitted upon issuance of and as provided in Executive Order 2020-05. B. All gyms and fitness centers are hereby ordered closed in accordance with the March 16, 2020 Order of the Health Officer of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. C. All formal and informal organized and group activities of any size, including but not limited to all games and sports, with the exception of family outings and use of the City’s tennis and pickleball courts in accordance with City regulations, are hereby prohibited in all City parks, the beach, Pier Plaza and other public spaces. D. Access to play structures and exercise equipment in all City parks, the beach, and the Greenbelt is hereby prohibited. E. The City shall post signs at all City parks, the Greenbelt, the beach, Pier Plaza and the Strand advising that: I. COVID-19 is known to survive on various surfaces such as children’s play equipment, bathroom surfaces, tables, benches, railings and other fixtures, for 72 or more hours; II. Users of public spaces shall maintain social distance as prescribed by Beach Cities Health District, as provided in Exhibit 1 attached hereto; and III. Users of public spaces with symptoms consistent with COVID -19 infection are encouraged to isolate themselves at home and contact their health care provider, or if they do not have a health care provider, the Los Angeles County Department of Health to assist with receiving prompt diagnosis and care. Pursuant to Section 4: In addition to the emergency orders listed in Section 3 above, the City Manager and Director of Emergency Services further orders that: A. The enforcement of City street sweeping restrictions suspended on March 16, 2020, as a part of the City’s effort to combat COVID-19, shall resume on June 8, 2020. *This Order was confirmed at the May 26th meeting. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 7 May 21, 2020 Resolution No. 7236, Rescinding Portions of Executive Order Nos. 2020-01 and 2020-03 to reopen the Strand: Pursuant to Section 2:The Strand is re-open for public use effective 6:00 a.m. on Saturday, May 23, 2020; Section 2, paragraph 10 of Executive Order No. 2020-01 and Section 2, paragraph 3 of Executive Order No. 2020-03 are hereby rescinded. No expiration date stated. May 26, 2020 Urgency Ordinance No. 20-1409U, Extending the Temporary Moratorium on Evictions Pursuant to Section 2: Ordinance No. 20-1407U will remain in effect until July 31, 020. All other provisions of Ordinance No. 20-1407U remain the same. Eviction Moratorium Period extended to July 31, 2020. May 26, 2020 Executive Order No. 2020-05, Implementing a Temporary Permit for Outdoor Dining/Seating and Outdoor Retail Display to Assist in the Reopening of Restaurants, and Food and Retail Establishments. Pursuant to Section 2: A. Established a temporary permit program for outdoor dining/seating. B. Established a temporary permit program to permit City businesses to display merchandise on the street. C. Provisions of HBMC §§ 17.26.050(B), (C),and 17.44.030. *This Order was confirmed at the June 9th meeting. Shall continue until the earlier to occur of: (1) the conclusion of the local emergency; (2) its termination is ordered by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services; or (3) it is duly terminated by the City Council. The Order may also be superseded by a duly enacted ordinance or order of the City Council expressly superseding this Order. June 9, 2020 Urgency Ordinance No. 1410U, Implementing a Temporary Permit for Outdoor Dining/Seating and Outdoor Retail Display to Assist in the Reopening of Restaurants, Food, and Retail: Section 2 reiterates subsection (A) and (C) in Executive Order No. 2020-05 above, and suspends these additional HBMC §§ 17.38.550(B), 12.16.090 and 12.16.100. No expiration date stated. June 15, 2020 City Manager/Director of Emergency Services Order No. 2020-06 Shall continue until the earlier to occur of: (1) the conclusion of the local emergency; (2) its termination is ordered by the City Manager/Director 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 8 Pursuant to Section 2. The following emergency order shall supersede Section 2, paragraphs 1 and 2 (only as applied to the beach) of Executive Order No. 2020-03: The beach will be open from 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. subject to the following: a. The following activities are allowed: i. Individual or household ocean activities such as surfing, swimming, kayaking, paddle boarding, and body surfing. ii. Individual or household active recreation and exercise such as walking and running. iii. Sitting, lying, picnicking or otherwise congregating or engaging in stationary activities (such as yoga, calisthenics, or meditation on the sand individually or with members of the same household. iv. Use of chairs, canopies or coolers. b. The following activities are prohibited: v. Group or organized sports such as volleyball. vi. Gatherings or events. c. All beachgoers must follow the following safety requirements: i. Maintain more than 6 feet physical distance from others at all times (except between members of same household) ii. Wear face coverings, when out of the water and in contact with others who do not belong to the same household (except for children under age 2 and children with breathing problems). Pursuant to Section 3. The following emergency order shall supersede Section 2, paragraph 3 of Executive Order No. 2020-03: The City Pier will re-open on June 15, 2020 for normal operational hours of 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM. Pier users must maintain physical distance, avoid gatherings and wear a face covering when physical distance cannot be maintained. Pursuant to Section 4. The following emergency order shall supersede Section 2, paragraph 5 of Executive Order No. 2020-03 and Section 3, paragraph A of Executive Order No. 2020-04: of Emergency Services; or (3) it is duly terminated by the City Council. The Order may also be superseded by a duly enacted ordinance or order of the City Council expressly superseding this Order. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 9 A. Lower risk retail businesses may open for business in accordance with Appendix B of the June 11 Revised Order. B. Non-retail lower risk manufacturing and logistics sector business that supply low-risk retail business may open for business in accordance with Appendix C of the June 11 Revised Order. C. Non-essential office-based businesses may open for business in accordance with Appendix D of the June 11 Revised Order. D. Hair salons and barbershops may open for business in accordance with Appendix H of the June 11 Revised Order. E. Art galleries and museums may open for business in accordance with Appendix M of the June 11 Revised Order. Pursuant to Section 5. Section 3, Paragraph B of Executive Order No. 2020-04 pertaining to gyms and fitness centers is rescinded and those businesses may re-open in compliance with Gym and Fitness Establishments Protocols (Appendix L) of the June 11 Revised Order. Pursuant to Section 6. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 3, paragraph C of Executive Order No. 2020-04 to the contrary: A. Day Camps and Camp Permits. City run and City-permitted day camps are permitted to resume operations. Camp operators must comply with the Los Angeles County Health Department Day Camp Protocol (Appendix K) and submit the completed protocol checklist to the City prior to issuance of a permit. B. Outdoor Fitness Permits. Outdoor fitness instruction will be permitted to resume only for activities that are specifically allowed within the June 11 Revised Order. Operators must comply with the Los Angeles County Public Health Department Gym and Fitness Protocol (Appendix L) and submit the completed protocol checklist to the City prior to issuance of a permit. Pursuant to Section 7. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 2, paragraph 4 of Executive Order No. 2020-03 to the contrary: A. Parking Lot A is reopened for use for non-permit holders with a new time limit of 3 hours per day, and for use by monthly permit holders. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 10 B. Parking Lot B is reopened for use for non-permit holders. C. Parking Lot D temporary restrictions are removed. *This Order was confirmed at the June 23rd meeting. June 24, 2020 City Manager/Director of Emergency Services Executive Order No. 2020-07 Pursuant to Section 2. The following emergency order shall supersede Section 3, paragraph A of Executive Order No. 2020-04: Bars, wineries and brewery tasting rooms may open for business in accordance with Appendix S of the County Health Officer’s June 18, 2020 Revised Order. Shall continue until the earlier to occur of: (1) the conclusion of the local emergency; (2) its termination is ordered by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services; or (3) it is duly terminated by the City Council. The Order may also be superseded by a duly enacted ordinance or order of the City Council expressly superseding this Order. June 29, 2020 City Manager/Director of Emergency Services Executive Order No. 2020-08. Pursuant to Section 2: Bars, wineries, breweries and wine tasting rooms are closed in accordance with paragraph 7, subsections (b) and (c) of the Revised Order (Revised Order refers to LA County Health June 29, 2020 Health Order) Pursuant to Section 3: Restaurants and food facilities must abide by paragraph 18, subsection (l) of the County Health Officer’s Revised Order and Appendix I, to establish a “reservation only” system to notify patrons of seating availability and to allow for the collection of contact information to be utilized for contact-tracing if needed. *This Order was confirmed at the July 1st meeting. Shall continue until the earlier to occur of: (1) the conclusion of the local emergency; (2) its termination is ordered by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services; or (3) it is duly terminated by the City Council. The Order may also be superseded by a duly enacted ordinance or order of the City Council expressly superseding this Order. July 1, 2020 Resolution No. 20-7249, Temporarily Suspending for the Duration of the Fourth of July Holiday Weekend Specified City Manager Orders and City Council Resolutions Pursuant to Section 2: A. Notwithstanding Section 2(4) of Executive Order No. 2020-03, the following City parking facilities are closed from12:01 a.m. July 3, 2020 through 5:00 a.m. on the These are temporary measures and shall expire on the BOLD dates to the left. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 11 morning of July 6, 2020: a. Parking Lot A; and b. Parking Lot B spaces will be reassigned for use by monthly permit holders only. B. Notwithstanding Executive Order No. 2020-05 and any ordinance or permit entitlement to the contrary, all dine-in restaurants in the City shall close for business at 11:00 p.m. each evening until 5:00 a.m. the following morning from July 3, 2020 to and including July 5, 2020. C. Notwithstanding any ordinance or permit entitlement to the contrary, all off-sale alcohol establishments, including but not limited to liquor stores and grocery stores, shall cease all sales of alcoholic beverages at 11:00 p.m. each evening until 6:00 a.m. the following morning from July 3, 2020 to and including July 5, 2020. D. Lower Pier Plaza is closed from 12:01 a.m. through 5:00 a.m. the same morning from July 4, 2020 to and including July 6, 2020. July 17, 2020 City Manager/Director of Emergency Services Executive Order No. 2020-09, Implementing Emergency Measures to Temporarily Permit Gyms, Fitness Facilities, Hair Salons and Barbershops to Operate Outdoors During the COVID-19 Crisis. Pursuant to Section 2:  Hermosa Beach Municipal Code sections 17.26.050(B), 17.44.030 and 17.38.550 are temporarily suspending during the term of City State and LA County COVID-19 emergency orders to temporarily permit gyms, fitness facilities, hair salons and barbershops to operate outdoors. *This Order was confirmed at the July 28th meeting. Shall continue until the earlier to occur of: (1) the conclusion of the local emergency; (2) its termination is ordered by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services; or (3) it is duly terminated by the City Council. The Order may also be superseded by a duly enacted ordinance or order of the City Council expressly superseding this Order. July 28, 2020 Urgency Ordinance No. 20-1415U, Temporarily Suspending Local Zoning to Permit Specified Businesses to Operate Outdoors, Permit Certain Home occupations to Operate without a Commercial Business Location and Require Members of the Public to wear a Face Covering. Pursuant to Section 2. Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050 (B), 17.44.030, 17.38.550(B) and 17.08.020(D)(14) regarding uses permitted within commercial zones, off-street parking requirements for commercial and business uses within commercial zones, and home occupation The measures adopted in Section 2, are temporary and shall continue during the term of the City, State and Los Angeles County COVID-19 emergency orders 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 12 permits are temporarily suspended to allow for the implementation of items A and B below on a temporary basis during the term of the City, State and Los Angeles County COVID-19 emergency orders: A. Gyms, fitness centers, hair salons, barbershops and personal care establishments (to the extent permitted by the State Board of Barbering and Cosmetology) may operate outdoors to assist in their economic recovery in accordance with the “Outdoor Commercial Uses Operational Standards” attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. B. Consistent with the Los Angeles County Health Officer Reopening Protocol for Personal Care Establishment in Appendix R, “personal care services” shall include: nail salons, tanning salons, esthetician, skin care, cosmetology services and massage therapy (in a non-healthcare setting). Electrology, tattooing, microblading, permanent make-up and piercing may not operate outdoors because they are invasive procedures that require a controlled hygienic environment to be performed safely. Mobile or in-home personal care services are not allowed. C. Professional offices, including but not limited to the healing arts, law, accounting, real estate, clergy, insurance and similar professional or semiprofessional offices may rend er their services from their residence with a home occupation permit regardless if they comply with Municipal Code section 17.08.020(D)(14), to allow them to continue to operate and pursue their livelihoods while complying with California and Los Angeles County Health orders in response to COVID-19. Pursuant to Section 3. The following emergency measures are adopted: A. All persons shall wear a face covering over both the nose and mouth whenever they are present in the following locations within the City: a. The Beach. b. Downtown Hermosa Beach, defined as (i) the area bounded by the southerly edge of the 10th Street right-of-way on the south, the northerly edge of the 14th Street right-of-way on the north, the easterly edge of the Strand on the west and the easterly edge of the Hermosa Avenue right-of-way on the east, and (ii) Upper Pier Avenue (inclusive of sidewalks) from Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive. c. The Greenbelt. d. All City parks. e. Pier Plaza. f. The Strand. No specific expiration date set for Section 3. No specific expiration date set for Section 4. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 13 B. All persons shall wear a face covering over both the nose and mouth whenever they leave their place of residence and are or can be in contact with or walking near or past others who are non - household members in both public and private places whether indoors or outdoors, in all locations in the City other than those locations described in and subject to the proscription set forth in paragraph A of this Section 3. C. Paragraphs A and B of this Section 3 shall not apply to: a. Persons younger than two years old; b. Persons who have been instructed by a medical provider not to wear a face covering due to a medical condition, mental health condition, or disability that prevents wearing a face covering; c. Persons who are hearing impaired, or communicating with a person who is hearing impaired, where the ability to see the mouth is essential for communication; d. Persons who are swimming or engaged in other water-based activities; and e. Healthcare workers, first responders, and others whose work requires close contact with people who are ill. D. For purposes of this Ordinance, “face covering” shall mean: fabric coverings, such as cloth masks, scarves, bandanas, tightly woven fabric such as cotton t-shirt, and some types of towels that cover the nose and mouth. Medical-grade masks and N-95 respirators are not required. E. Persons who are seated at a restaurant or other establishment that offers food or beverage service shall wear a cloth face covering over both the nose and mouth unless they are eating or drinking. F. With respect to persons on the beach, this Ordinance supersedes Section 2(c)(ii) of City Manager Executive Order No. 2020-06. G. The provisions of this Section 3 shall be enforced by way of issuance of administrative citations pursuant to HBMC Chapter 1.10. Pursuant to Section 4. In addition to enforcement remedies available to the City as provided in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, emergency executive orders issued by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services and confirmed by City Council, and emergency ordinances, orders and resolutions adopted by the City Council shall be enforceable by way of: 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 14 A. Imposing an administrative citation pursuant to HBMC Chapter 1.10. B. Prosecuting a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not to exceed one thousand ($1,000) dollars or by imprisonment for not to exceed six months, or both. July 28, 2020. Urgency Ordinance No. 2020-1414U, Extending the Temporary Moratorium on Evictions During the COVID-19 Pandemic Pursuant to Section 2. A. During the moratorium period declared in response to COVID-19, no landlord shall endeavor to evict a tenant for nonpayment of rent if the tenant demonstrates that the tenant is unable to pay rent due to financial impacts related to COVID-19. The moratorium period is March 16, 2020 through September 30, 2020. B. Nothing in this ordinance shall relieve the tenant of liability for the unpaid rent, which the landlord may seek after expiration of the moratorium period and the tenant must repay within six months of the expiration of the moratorium period. A landlord may not charge or collect a late fee or interest for rent that is delayed for the reasons stated in this ordinance; nor may a landlord seek rent that is delayed for the reasons stated in this ordinance through the eviction process. A landlord shall not commence an eviction during the six months after the end of the moratorium period so long as the tenant pays rent in a timely manner after the moratorium period and is repaying the past due rent that accrued during the moratorium period. Nonpayment of rent in accordance with the terms of this ordinance shall not be grounds for eviction of a tenant even after expiration of the moratorium period. Pursuant to Section 3. A. During the moratorium period declared in response to COVID-19, no commercial landlord shall endeavor to evict a tenant for nonpayment of rent if the tenant demonstrates that the tenant’s businesses is subject to the Orders referenced in Section 1 of this Ordinance or is otherwise limited or closed (voluntarily or by mandate) to prevent or reduce the spread of COVID-19 and the tenant demonstrates lost income and inability to pay rent as a result of such limitation or closure or other demonstrated financial impact related to COVID-19. The moratorium period is March 16, 2020 through September 30, 2020. B. Nothing in this ordinance shall relieve the tenant of liability for the unpaid rent, which the landlord may seek after the expiration of the moratorium period and the tenant must pay within six months of the expiration of the moratorium period. A landlord may not charge or collect a late fee or interest for rent that is delayed for the reasons stated in this ordinance; nor may a landlord seek rent that Moratorium period for both commercial and residential tenants is March 16 through September 30, 2020 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 15 is delayed for the reasons stated in this ordinance, through the eviction process during or after the moratorium period. A landlord shall not commence an eviction during the six months after the end of the moratorium period for non-payment of rent, so long as the tenant pays rent in a timely manner after the moratorium period and is repaying the past due rent that accrued during the moratorium period. Nonpayment of rent in accordance with the terms of this ordinance shall not be grounds for eviction of a tenant even after expiration of the moratorium period. Pursuant to Section 4. A. For mortgagors that are not eligible for financial relief under Governor Newsom’s Financial Relief Package, no foreclosure action against a property owner shall be initiated or proceed during the moratorium period in the City for any mortgagor with a demonstrated financial impact related to COVID-19. Nothing in this ordinance shall relieve the mortgagor of liability for any unpaid mortgage payments, which the mortgagee may seek after expiration of the moratorium period and the mortgagor must pay within six months of the expiration of the moratorium period unless a different time is agreed to between the parties. A mortgagee may not charge or collect a late fee or penalty for payments that are delayed for the reasons stated in this ordinance. The moratorium period is March 16, 2020 through September 30, 2020. August 13, 2020 City Manager\Director of Emergency Services Executive Order No. 2020-10, Implementing Emergency Measures to Temporarily Permit Places of Worship to Operate outdoor During the COVID - 19 Pandemic. Pursuant to section 2. The provisions of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050 (B), 17.44.030, 17.38.550(B) and 17.40.020 regarding uses permitted within commercial zones, off-street parking requirements and uses for which a conditional use permit is required are hereby temporarily suspended, to the extent they conflict with this Order, to allow for the implementation of item A below on a temporary basis during the term of the City, State and Los Angeles County COVID-19 emergency orders: A. Places of worship and providers of religious services and cultural ceremonies (referred to collectively as “Places of Worship”), may operate outdoors in accordance with Appendix F of the County’s July 18th Order, as that protocol may be updated from time to time by the County Health Officer. *This Order was confirmed at the Aug. 25th meeting. Shall continue until the earlier to occur of: (1) the conclusion of the local emergency; (2) its termination is ordered by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services; or (3) it is duly terminated by the City Council. The Order may also be superseded by a duly enacted ordinance or order of the City Council expressly superseding this Order. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 16 August 25, 2020 Urgency Ordinance No. 1416U, to Temporarily Permit Places of Worship to Operate Outdoors During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Pursuant to section 2. The provisions of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050 (B), 17.44.030, 17.38.550(B) and 17.40.020 regarding uses permitted within commercial zones, off-street parking requirements and uses for which a conditional use permit is required are hereby temporarily suspended, to the extent they conflict with this Ordinance, to allow for the implementation of item A below on a temporary basis during the term of the City, State and Los Angeles County COVID-19 emergency orders: A. Places of worship and providers of religious services and cultural ceremonies (referred to collectively as “Places of Worship”), may operate outdoors in accordance with Appendix F of the County’s Health Officer Order, as that protocol may be updated from time to time by the County Health Officer. On a temporary basis during the term of the City, State and Los Angeles County COVID-19 emergency orders: August 25, 2020 City Manager Executive Order No. 2020-11, Implementing Temporary Lane Closures on Hermosa Ave. to Facilitate Outdoor Recreation and Economic Recovery in Accordance with Health officer Orders for Control of COVID-19. 1. Beginning August 20, 2020, the City in consultation with the City’s traffic consultant, may temporarily close to vehicular traffic the northbound and southbound # 2 travel lanes (closest to the curb) on Hermosa Avenue from the 800 block at 8th Street to the 1300 block at 14th street. Lane closures will continue for 6 months following the complete implementation of the traffic control measures approved by the City Council on Aug. 11, unless the closures are extended for a longer period or sooner terminated by the City Council or Director of Emergency Services. 2. Beginning Aug. 20, 2020, the City in consultation with the City’s traffic consultant, may temporarily close to vehicular traffic the right turn lanes from westbound Greenwich Village to northbound Hermosa Ave. and the part of Hermosa Ave. immediately adjacent to 2626 Hermosa Ave. The lanes may remain closed until Jan 13, 2021, unless the closures are extended for a longer period or sooner terminated by the City Council. 3. The City shall post signs giving notice of these temporary measures. 4. Use of the closed lanes or parking spaces for any commercial purpose requires a Temporary Permit for Outdoor Dining/Seating and Outdoor Retail Display, as set out in the recitals of this Order. The duration of each measure is specified in BOLD to the left. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 17 *This Order was confirmed at the Aug. 25th meeting September 10, 2020 City Manager Executive Order No. 2020-12, Implementing Emergency Measures to Temporarily Defer Payment of City Business Taxes During the COVID-19 Pandemic Pursuant to Section 2: Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 5.04.190, 5.04.200 and 5.04.240 regarding City business taxes are hereby temporarily suspended to the extent they conflict with this Order, to allow for implementation of the following: A. The business tax due and payable on and after March 31, 2020 shall be deferred and interest and penalties waived for any business that ceased all business operations between March 16 and 31, 2020, has been entirely closed and remains closed as of the date of this Order due to the COVID-19 pandemic. B. Business taxes deferred pursuant to paragraph A above are deferred until the business resumes operation, at which time the tax due will be prorated until the business’ next tax payment anniversary date. C. In order to be eligible for the deferral provided for in paragraph A above, the business owner must sign a statement under penalty of perjury that provides dates of closure supported by documentation of the closure satisfactory to the City. If the foregoing statement is found to be untrue, the past due business tax, including penalties and interest, shall become payable immediately. D. A business that is eligible for the deferral provided for in paragraph A and that paid a business tax on or after March 31, 2020 is entitled to and may apply to the City for a refund of the tax. * This order was confirmed at the Sep. 22nd meeting Shall continue until the earlier to occur of: (1) the conclusion of the local emergency; (2) its termination is ordered by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services; or (3) it is duly terminated by the City Council. The Order may also be superseded by a duly enacted ordinance or order of the City Council expressly superseding this Order. September 22, 2020 Urgency Ordinance No. 20-1417U, Clarifying the Temporary Moratorium on Evictions During the COVID-19 Pandemic Pursuant to Section 2. A. During the moratorium period declared in response to COVID-19, no commercial landlord shall endeavor to evict a tenant for nonpayment of rent if the tenant demonstrates that the tenant’s businesses is subject to the Orders referenced in Section 1 of this ordinance or is otherwise limited or closed (voluntarily or by mandate) to prevent or reduce the spread of COVID-19 and the tenant demonstrates lost income and inability to pay rent as a result of such limitation or closure or other demonstrated financial impact related to COVID-19. For purposes of this Section 2, the moratorium period is March 16, 2020 through January 31, 2021. For commercial tenants, the eviction moratorium period for commercial tenants is March 16, 2020 through January 31, 2021. For residential tenants, the “repayment period” for deferred rent that came or will come due between March 1, 2020 through January 31, 2021 inclusive, is October 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 18 B. A landlord knows of a tenant’s lost income and inability to pay rent within the meaning of this Section 2 if the tenant, within 30 days after the date rent is due, notifies the landlord in writing of the lost income and inability to pay rent due to a limitation or closure of the tenant’s business related to COVID-19, and provides appropriate supporting documentation within 30 days of providing the notice. If a tenant suffers only a partial loss of net income, the tenant shall pay the pro-rated share of their rent that corresponds to the net income they generated during the period of loss. C. Nothing in this Section 2 shall relieve the tenant of liability for the unpaid rent, which the landlord may seek after expiration of the moratorium period, and which tenant must pay within six months of the expiration of the moratorium period (i.e. no later than July 31, 2021). A landlord may not charge or collect a late fee or interest for rent that is delayed for the reasons stated in this Section 2; nor may a landlord seek rent that is delayed for the reasons stated in this Section 2, through the eviction process during or after the moratorium period. A landlord shall not commence an eviction during the six months after the end of the moratorium period for non-payment of rent, so long as the tenant pays rent in a timely manner after the moratorium period and is repaying the past due rent that accrued during the moratorium period Pursuant to Section 3. A. With respect to residential evictions for non-payment of rent due to financial impacts from COVID-19, the following applies: 1. The “repayment period” for deferred rent that came or will come due between March 1, 2020 through January 31, 2021 (defined under the Act as “COVID-19 rental debt”), inclusive, is October 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. 2. For the period of time of March 16, 2020 through September 30, 2020 (the “moratorium period”), no residential landlord shall endeavor to evict a tenant for nonpayment of rent, if the tenant demonstrates that the tenant is unable to pay rent due to financial impacts related to COVID-19, subject to subparagraphs (a) and (b) of Section 3(A)(2) of this Ordinance. A landlord shall not commence an eviction during the six months after the end of the moratorium period, so long as the tenant pays rent in a timely manner after the moratorium period and is repaying the past due rent that accrued during the moratorium period. A landlord may not charge or collect a late fee or interest for rent that is delayed for the reasons stated in this Paragraph 2. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 19 October 27, 2020 Resolution No. 20-7262, Implementing Emergency Measures to Prevent Customers Queuing for Outdoor Dining at Sit-Down Restaurants Pursuant to Section 2. A. No dine-in restaurant shall permit the congregating or lining up of customers in any public right-of-way. The congregating or lining up of customers outside a dine-in restaurant, in any manner, on sidewalks or other public rights of way is prohibited. B. Unless no table is available, a dine-in restaurant must immediately seat customers in its outdoor dining area if the customer is dining on-site. In the event no table is available, the restaurant staff shall ask the customer to wait in a vehicle or at a location away from the restaurant premises. C. Dine-in restaurants shall implement a phone reservation or call-back system that notifies customers via text, phone call, or other method once a table has become available. No customer shall be permitted in the dining area until the customer has been notified by the restaurant that he or she can be seated. D. Restaurant staff shall be responsible for instructing dine-in customers not to form lines or congregate in abutting public areas while waiting to be seated. Shall remain in effect until repealed or superseded. November 24, 2020 Urgency Ordinance No. 20-1420U, Temporary Moratorium on Commercial Evictions During the COVID-19 Pandemic Pursuant to Section 2: Section 2 of Ordinance No. 20-1417U (The Temporary Moratorium on Evictions for Non-Payment of Rent by Commercial Tenants Impacted by the COVID -19 Crisis) is amended by renumbering Subsection “E” as Subsection “F” and adding a new Subsection E to read as follows. Subsection A, B, C and D of Section 2 remain unchanged. E. During the moratorium period declared in response to COVID-19, no commercial landlord shall terminate a tenancy to demolish or substantially remodel the commercial real property unless and until the landlord secures all permits necessary to perform the work. For purposes of this Subsection, “substantially remodel” means to make a modification of the property that requires a permit from the City. This ordinance shall apply to tenancy termination notices, notices to quit and other eviction notices, and the unlawful detainer actions based on such notices, served or filed on or before the effective date of this ordinance; but, where the time to vacate the property has not passed. No expiration date set forth. The moratorium period for commercial tenants adopted in Urgency Ordinance No. 20-1417U and restated below continue to apply: The eviction moratorium period for commercial tenants is March 16, 2020 through January 31, 2021. 65270.00001\33411336.1 City of Hermosa Beach COVID-19 Related Resolutions\Ordinances Good thru 01/11/2021 20 F. No other legal remedies available to a commercial landlord are affected by this ordinance. December 8, 2020 Urgency Ordinance No. 20-1422U, Amending the Temporary Moratorium on Residential Evictions During the COVID-19 Pandemic Pursuant to 2: Section 3 of Ordinance No. 20-1417U (The Temporary Moratorium on Evictions for Non- Payment of Rent by Residential Tenants Impacted by the COVID-19 Crisis) is amended by adding Paragraph 7 to Subsection A to read as follows. All other provisions of Subsection A remain unchanged. 7. Starting on the effective date of this ordinance through January 31, 2021, no residential landlord shall terminate a tenancy to demolish or substantially remodel the residential real property unless and until the landlord secures all permits necessary to perform the work. For purposes of this Section, “substantially remodel” means to make a modification of the property that requires a permit from the City. This ordinance shall apply to tenancy termination notices, notices to quit and other eviction notices, and the unlawful detainer actions based on such notices, served or filed on or before the effective date of this ordinance; but, where the time to vacate the property has not passed. (a) To the extent applicable, landlords must provide relocation assistance and satisfy other requirements in accordance with the Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (Cal. Civil Code § 1496.2) for a no - fault just cause eviction. (b) No other legal remedies available to landlords are affected by this Paragraph 7. No expiration date set forth. The moratorium period for residential tenants adopted in Urgency Ordinance No. 20-1417U and restated below continue to apply: The “repayment period” for deferred rent that came or will come due between March 1, 2020 through January 31, 2021 inclusive, is October 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0096 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 APPROVAL OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION’S RECOMMENDED LANGUAGE UPDATES TO THE SPECIAL EVENT FEE WAIVER POLICY TO ALLOW ELIGIBILITY TO RELIGIOUS GROUPS; AND DESIGNATION OF A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF FEE WAIVERS TO BE GRANTED FOR SPECIAL EVENTS HELD IN 2021 (Community Resources Manager Kelly Orta) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that City Council: 1.Approve the Parks,Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission’s recommendation to update the Special Event Fee Waiver Policy to allow fee waiver consideration for religious groups; and 2.Designate a maximum amount of $20,000 in fee waivers to be granted for special events held in 2021. Executive Summary: The City’s Special Event Policy Guide,adopted by the City Council in 2017,outlines policies and procedures required of event producers to hold an event on public property within the City of Hermosa Beach.An updated Special Event Fee Waiver Policy was included following its adoption by the City Council on October 10,2019,which stated that religious or political events were ineligible for fee waiver consideration.Recently,the United States Supreme Court concluded that a policy of the State of Montana refusing the use of publicly funded scholarships for those attending religious schools violates the “free exercise”clause of the First Amendment.The Parks,Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission recommends a language modification to the Special Event Fee Waiver policy to be consistent with this ruling and allow religious events to be eligible for fee waiver consideration. The Special Event Fee Waiver Policy also requires the City Council to annually designate a maximum amount of fee waivers to be granted for special events held in each calendar year.As staff continues developing the 2021 calendar of events,assuming a relaxation of COVID-19 precautionary measures,the Commission’s consideration of fee waiver requests must take place soon to ensure event producers have time to financially plan for their events.Therefore,staff requests the City City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0096 event producers have time to financially plan for their events.Therefore,staff requests the City Council to designate the maximum amount of fee waivers that can be applied to qualified events held in 2021. Background: The City’s Special Event Policy Guide,adopted by the City Council in 2017,outlines policies and procedures required of event producers to hold an event on public property within the City of Hermosa Beach.At the City Council’s October 10,2019 meeting,it approved the Parks,Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission’s recommended Special Event Fee Waiver Policy ( Attachment 1). The proposed policy provides the Commission with the ability to approve the award of fee waivers through a grant process.As detailed in the policy,the City Council will annually affirm the maximum amount of grant funding available to the Commission to award to qualified events for the upcoming calendar year.The Council designated a maximum of $20,000 for events held in 2020.Those funds awarded to each organization may only be applied towards event-related City fees. Following its adoption,this policy was intended to go into effect for those events approved to take place in 2020.Unfortunately,due to the COVID-19 pandemic,events were unable to be held and, therefore,no fee waivers were granted for that calendar year.As the City continues to approve events to be held in 2021,assuming the relaxation of COVID-19 precautionary measures, consideration of fee waiver requests is the next step for event producers to financially plan for their events.In order to initiate this review and fee waiver approval process,the City Council is required to designate a maximum amount of money that the Commission can award for 2021. Lastly,a recent decision of the United States Supreme Court concluded that a policy of the State of Montana that refused the use of publicly funded scholarships for those attending religious schools violated the First Amendment.The existing Special Event Fee Waiver policy is inconsistent with this ruling.The Parks,Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission recommends a language modification to this policy to be consistent and allow religious events to be eligible for fee waiver consideration. Discussion: Special Event Fee Waiver Policy Update Currently,the Special Event Fee Waiver Policy (Attachment 1)includes the exclusion of religious or political events from being considered for a special event fee waiver under the premise that fee waivers are considered a gift of public funds.However,if an event or activity is being produced by a religious or political group but has a charitable objective or provides a community-benefit,and the proceeds do not provide financial support to the organization producing it,fee waivers would be eligible for consideration.In other words,an event would not be eligible for a fee waiver if the intent of the event was to further the religious or political nature of the group producing it.Otherwise,an event City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 2 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0096 the event was to further the religious or political nature of the group producing it.Otherwise,an event would be eligible for consideration if there was no religious our political message behind the event itself, regardless of the interests of the group producing it. The City Attorney advises that in 2020,the Supreme Court decided in Espinoza et al.v.Montana Department of Revenue that disqualification of groups for public funding based on religion violates the United States Constitution’s free exercise clause.The Special Event Fee Waiver policy’s exclusion of religious events from fee waivers conflicts with this new ruling.At the Commission’s December 1,2020 meeting,it recommended the City Council’s approval of proposed language updates to the policy reflecting the removal of the prohibition of public funding to events based solely on their religious nature. The redline of this policy update is included as Attachment 2. 2021 Special Event Fee Waiver Maximum Grant Allocation The Special Event Fee Waiver policy outlines the level of fee waivers that can be awarded in addition to the types of fees that are eligible for fee waiver consideration, including: “Grants will be awarded up to a maximum of $2,500 per event or a 50%reduction of indirect City special event fees, whichever is the lesser amount.” Each organization,if determined to meet the qualifications of the grant policy,may receive the lesser amount of $2,500 or 50%of applicable special event fees (indirect costs)eligible for reduction.Fees applied toward the application fee,staff time,inspections,Police or Fire services,etc.are ineligible. Those fees that are eligible for fee reductions include daily permit fees,set-up and tear-down fees, etc. Included in Table 1 are the various special event fees categorized between indirect or direct fees: Table 1: “Direct” versus “Indirect” Special Event Fees INDIRE CT FEES (eligible for fee waiver consideration) Cost Permit Fees Category I (non -profit) $2 per person Cate g ory I (commercial) 70/30 spli t of registr ation Category II $2 ,811 per day Category III $3,093 per day Category IV $5 ,623 pe r day Pier Plaza Use $11,771 per day Event Co -sponsor $2 97 each Event Set -up/Tear -down $266 per location, per day DIRE CT FEES (in eligible for fee waiver consideration) Cost Application Fee (non -profit) $5 89 Application Fee (commercial) $883 Application Fee (pass -through) $294 Amplified Soun d Permit $173 Parking Meter Space Fee $1.25 per hour (8am – 8p m) $1.50 per hour (8pm – 8a m ) City Staff /Resources P o lice, CS O ’s, PSO ’s, Comm unity Resources, Public Works, Inspectio ns , etc. Varies City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 3 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0096 INDIRE CT FEES (eligible for fee waiver consideration) Cost Permit Fees Category I (non -profit) $2 per person Cate g ory I (commercial) 70/30 spli t of registr ation Category II $2 ,811 per day Category III $3,093 per day Category IV $5 ,623 pe r day Pier Plaza Use $11,771 per day Event Co -sponsor $2 97 each Event Set -up/Tear -down $266 per location, per day DIRE CT FEES (in eligible for fee waiver consideration) Cost Application Fee (non -profit) $5 89 Application Fee (commercial) $883 Application Fee (pass -through) $294 Amplified Soun d Permit $173 Parking Meter Space Fee $1.25 per hour (8am – 8p m) $1.50 per hour (8pm – 8a m ) City Staff /Resources P o lice, CS O ’s, PSO ’s, Comm unity Resources, Public Works, Inspectio ns , etc. Varies As required in the Special Event Fee Waiver Policy,the City Council must annually determine a maximum amount of fee waivers the Commission can award to qualifying events for each calendar year.The City Council designated the maximum of $20,000 in fee waiver grants for 2020.As previously noted,grant funding was not awarded in 2020 due to event cancelations associated with COVID-19 precautionary measures.A majority of events already granted approval for their upcoming 2021 events are returning to Hermosa Beach and would be eligible for fee waiver consideration. Unfortunately, it is unknown at this time how many intend to apply for this aid. General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: Parks and Open Space Element City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 4 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0096 Goal 3. Community parks and facilities encourage social activity and interaction. Policies ·3.1.Community-friendly events.Encourage,permit,and support community group, nonprofit,or business organized events on City property that support physical activity, beach culture, and family-friendly social interactions. Goal 8.Special events at the beach are balanced to support community recreation and economic development without restricting coastal access or impacting the community. Policies ·8.2.Off-peak season events.Incentivize event producers to host special events during off-peak seasons through reduced fees or accommodating location/reserved area preferences. ·8.6.Special event impact fees.Require special event applicants pay a fair share of costs associated with impacts on City services and facilities required to support special events. Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impacts are unknown at this time since the 2021 Special Event Calendar is still in the development stages.An increase in special event revenue from the previous fiscal year is anticipated,although this amount can’t be actualized due to the uncertainty of when events would be allowed to take place consistent with COVID-19 precautionary measures. Attachments: 1. Current Special Event Fee Waiver Policy 2. Proposed Special Event Fee Waiver Policy Respectfully Submitted by: Kelly Orta, Community Resources Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 5 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Special Event Fee Waiver Grant Policy The City of Hermosa Beach hosts a variety of special events that attract thousands of visitors each year. These events must be consistent with the city’s Special Event Policy Guide Mission Statement: Hermosa Beach strives to offer a safe and enjoyable environment for special events to take place in a way that balances resident and visitor needs. Special events in Hermosa Beach are celebrated for being community-friendly, enhancing local beach culture and offering a myriad of benefits to the local community. The City of Hermosa Beach works collaboratively with event operators in an efficient and clear manner to process and carry out permits in compliance with this policy. In an effort to support qualifying organizations, the City provides special event fee waiver grant opportunities to assist in its success by relieving the financial burden associated with the cost of the City’s special event fees. The Special Event Fee Waiver Grant Policy is intended for those events required to complete the annual application filing, review, and approval process. Events and organizations that qualify for a long-term agreement are not bound to the terms of this policy. Grant Funding Limits The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission (“Commission”) awards grant funding for qualified organizations that have received approval to hold their event in the City of Hermosa Beach. The annual award limit of the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant is approved by the City Council each fall for the upcoming calendar year. For the 2021 calendar year, the annual maximum of grant funding available is __________ to qualified organizations. Grants will be awarded up to a maximum of $2,500 per event or a 50% reduction of indirect City special event fees, whichever is the lesser amount. Awards may only be used toward indirect special event fees charged by the City; direct costs (i.e. application processing fee, inspections, staff time, Police or Fire services, etc.) are not eligible for consideration of this grant and organizations are required to pay those in full. A fee worksheet is included in the Fee Waiver Grant Application that further outlines those fees eligible under this grant. The minimum amount of requested special event fee waiver grants must total at least $250. Fee waivers will not be considered for events taking place between Memorial Day and Labor Day (peak season). Eligibility In order to be eligible to apply for a Special Event Fee Waiver Grant, the special event must have been successfully approved through its applicable approval process as outlined in the Special Event Policy Guide. Following approval of a special event, a completed Special Event Fee Waiver Grant Application is required to be submitted to the Community Resources Department at least 60 days prior to the event. Following a review to ensure the completeness of the application, the request will be included on an upcoming meeting of the Commission for its formal review and determination of grant award. Fee waivers may be granted when the Commission determines that the event is of significant value to the community or to a significant portion of its residents and provides a measurable community benefit. In addition, the organization producing the event must meet at least 1 (one) of the following criteria: 1) An organization that has a demonstrated community benefit to Hermosa Beach. 2) Hermosa Beach business that is not delinquent on city permits or fees. 3) Organizations that are producing returning events to the City of Hermosa Beach and can demonstrate: a. A community benefit (must complete the Community Benefit form); or b. A positive economic impact as a result of the event (must complete the Economic Impact Report with previous years’ event details). Activities specifically prohibited from receiving a fee waiver grant include those events that: • Promote, advocate or advance a political or religious message or belief. • Projects or organizations who have unsatisfactorily fulfilled its obligations from previous Special Event Fee Waiver Grant awards. Grant Approval The five (5) member Commission is tasked with reviewing and determining the level of Special Event Fee Waiver Grant award at one of their regular meetings held on the first Tuesday of each month beginning at 7:00pm. Consideration will include careful review of: • Special Event Fee Waiver Grant Application. • Community Benefit Form (if required). • Economic Impact Report (if required). • Successful fulfillment of previously awarded grant obligations. In addition, the Commission will consider the following evaluation criteria: • Whether the event serves, involves, and/or promotes Hermosa Beach, its residents, schools, and/or businesses. • Whether the event delivers substantive and measurable economic and community benefits to the City. • Whether the event enhances the quality of life to the Hermosa Beach community; offering recreational, cultural, social, and or and/or educational activities of interest to the community. The Commission’s decision to deny grant funding for specific events is appealable by the City Council. The City Council will not consider additional fee waiver considerations in addition to the maximum award amounts allowable through the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant program. Grant Obligations Organization receiving grant funding through the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant program will be required to complete the following: • Submission of a Grant Final Report within 30-days following the event. • A formal presentation to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission at one of its regular meeting no more than 60-days following the event. The presentation shall include discussion of: o Number of attendees. o Beneficiary of funds raised by the event (if applicable). o Overview of event budget and financial outlook. Grant Disqualification Failure to complete these requirements in accordance with this policy shall automatically disqualify the organization from submitting a future request to receive a Special Event Fee Waiver Grant for the remainder of the current calendar year plus one additional year. If any information submitted as part of the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant is found to be fraudulent, event approvals already granted for the remainder of the calendar year will be automatically revoked. While the organization will be permitted to reapply for approval of event(s) in the following calendar year, it will no longer be eligible to apply for Special Event Fee Waiver Grants. Special Event Fee Waiver Grant Policy The City of Hermosa Beach hosts a variety of special events that attract thousands of visitors each year. These events must be consistent with the city’s Special Event Policy Guide Mission Statement: Hermosa Beach strives to offer a safe and enjoyable environment for special events to take place in a way that balances resident and visitor needs. Special events in Hermosa Beach are celebrated for being community-friendly, enhancing local beach culture and offering a myriad of benefits to the local community. The City of Hermosa Beach works collaboratively with event operators in an efficient and clear manner to process and carry out permits in compliance with this policy. In an effort to support qualifying organizations, the City provides special event fee waiver grant opportunities to assist in its success by relieving the financial burden associated with the cost of the City’s special event fees. The Special Event Fee Waiver Grant Policy is intended for those events required to complete the annual application filing, review, and approval process. Events and organizations that qualify for a long-term agreement are not bound to the terms of this policy. Grant Funding Limits The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission (“Commission”) awards grant funding for qualified organizations that have received approval to hold their event in the City of Hermosa Beach. The annual award limit of the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant is approved by the City Council each fall for the upcoming calendar year. For the 2021 calendar year, the annual maximum of grant funding available is __________ to qualified organizations. Grants will be awarded up to a maximum of $2,500 per event or a 50% reduction of indirect City special event fees, whichever is the lesser amount. Awards may only be used toward indirect special event fees charged by the City; direct costs (i.e. application processing fee, inspections, staff time, Police or Fire services, etc.) are not eligible for consideration of this grant and organizations are required to pay those in full. A fee worksheet is included in the Fee Waiver Grant Application that further outlines those fees eligible under this grant. The minimum amount of requested special event fee waiver grants must total at least $250. Fee waivers will not be considered for events taking place between Memorial Day and Labor Day (peak season). Eligibility In order to be eligible to apply for a Special Event Fee Waiver Grant, the special event must have been successfully approved through its applicable approval process as outlined in the Special Event Policy Guide. Following approval of a special event, a completed Special Event Fee Waiver Grant Application is required to be submitted to the Community Resources Department at least 60 days prior to the event. Following a review to ensure the completeness of the application, the request will be included on an upcoming meeting of the Commission for its formal review and determination of grant award. Fee waivers may be granted when the Commission determines that the event is of significant value to the community or to a significant portion of its residents and provides a measurable community benefit. In addition, the organization producing the event must meet at least 1 (one) of the following criteria: 1) An organization that has a demonstrated community benefit to Hermosa Beach. 2) Hermosa Beach business that is not delinquent on city permits or fees. 3) Organizations that are producing returning events to the City of Hermosa Beach and can demonstrate: a. A community benefit (must complete the Community Benefit form); or b. A positive economic impact as a result of the event (must complete the Economic Impact Report with previous years’ event details). Activities specifically prohibited from receiving a fee waiver grant include those events that: • Promote, advocate or advance a political or religious message or belief. • Projects or organizations who have unsatisfactorily fulfilled its obligations from previous Special Event Fee Waiver Grant awards. Grant Approval The five (5) member Commission is tasked with reviewing and determining the level of Special Event Fee Waiver Grant award at one of their regular meetings held on the first Tuesday of each month beginning at 7:00pm. Consideration will include careful review of: • Special Event Fee Waiver Grant Application. • Community Benefit Form (if required). • Economic Impact Report (if required). • Successful fulfillment of previously awarded grant obligations. In addition, the Commission will consider the following evaluation criteria: • Whether the event serves, involves, and/or promotes Hermosa Beach, its residents, schools, and/or businesses. • Whether the event delivers substantive and measurable economic and community benefits to the City. • Whether the event enhances the quality of life to the Hermosa Beach community; offering recreational, cultural, social, and or and/or educational activities of interest to the community. The Commission’s decision to deny grant funding for specific events is appealable by the City Council. The City Council will not consider additional fee waiver considerations in addition to the maximum award amounts allowable through the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant program. Grant Obligations Organization receiving grant funding through the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant program will be required to complete the following: • Submission of a Grant Final Report within 30-days following the event. • A formal presentation to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission at one of its regular meeting no more than 60-days following the event. The presentation shall include discussion of: o Number of attendees. o Beneficiary of funds raised by the event (if applicable). o Overview of event budget and financial outlook. Grant Disqualification Failure to complete these requirements in accordance with this policy shall automatically disqualify the organization from submitting a future request to receive a Special Event Fee Waiver Grant for the remainder of the current calendar year plus one additional year. If any information submitted as part of the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant is found to be fraudulent, event approvals already granted for the remainder of the calendar year will be automatically revoked. While the organization will be permitted to reapply for approval of event(s) in the following calendar year, it will no longer be eligible to apply for Special Event Fee Waiver Grants. City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0052 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 A SAFER PROSPECT TRAFFIC SAFETY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Continued from January 26, 2021 (Environmental Analyst Leeanne Singleton) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1.Review and approve the draft traffic safety demonstration project concepts,as recommended by the Public Works Commission, for the Prospect Corridor (Attachment 1); 2.Adopt a Resolution (Attachment 2)authorizing the installation of the temporary traffic safety demonstration project on Prospect Avenue and determining the project is categorically exempt under CEQA; and 3.Authorize the City Manager to sign the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)with the Southern California Association of Governments (Attachment 3)for the temporary installation of the traffic safety demonstration project concepts from March through approximately June 2021. Executive Summary: City staff continues to work with the community and consulting team to evaluate traffic safety concerns and develop concepts to consider as part of a temporary demonstration project for the Prospect Corridor.Following a series of community meetings and engagement opportunities,as well as a presentation to the Public Works Commission on January 20,2021,draft concepts have been refined with community input and prepared for City Council review and consideration.If approved,the temporary project will be implemented in March 2021 and remain in place through June 2021,demonstrating traffic safety elements that help address speeding,pedestrian safety,and other traffic safety concerns expressed by the community on this corridor. Background: In September 2017,the City of Hermosa Beach applied for and received a grant award from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)for the Prospect Corridor to identify, implement,and evaluate traffic safety demonstration projects along the corridor.Implementation as a temporary demonstration project provides the City and the community an opportunity to test and evaluate a range of traffic calming and safety measures at different locations along the corridor so City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 7 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0052 evaluate a range of traffic calming and safety measures at different locations along the corridor so that the enhancements may be modified and/or considered for long-term implementation. The grant application was submitted following several traffic safety requests and concerns expressed by residents and parents of students that utilize the corridor to get to and from school.Traffic safety concerns expressed by the community in recent years have included calls for service to the Police Department and requests to the Public Works Department to address the speed of vehicular travel, visibility of vehicles and pedestrians at intersections,the volume of traffic that utilizes Prospect as an alternative to PCH, and the failure of drivers to stop or yield at intersections. SCAG conducted a request for proposals and interview process in Fall 2019 and,with participation from the City of Hermosa Beach in the interview process,Alta Planning +Design with Streets Plans were selected to lead the development and implementation of the project through a contract with SCAG.The project was initiated in January 2020,but due to COVID-19 required modifications to the project schedule,community engagement efforts,and programming options for the demonstration project. Community Engagement: In addition to the evaluation of speed,traffic volume,traffic collision history data for the corridor, engagement efforts have sought to understand community preferences,concerns,and interest in testing changes to the corridor to improve traffic safety.To date,the following activities have provided opportunities for the community to provide their feedback and input in the development of demonstration concepts for this project: July Community Meeting-the City hosted a Virtual Community Meeting on July 22,2020 to introduce the purpose of the demonstration project and hear from participating members of the community on what types of traffic safety concerns they have observed and where improvements,if any, should be considered. Social Media Engagement and Walk Audit Activity-leading up to and following the first community meeting,information about the project and opportunities to provide feedback were shared through the City’s social media channels.Social media posts included questions similar to the survey and links for those interested to complete the longer community survey and/or conduct a walk audit on their own to provide feedback and observations. Online Community Survey-following the July community meeting,an online survey was shared with the community to solicit their input on observations of the corridor and ideas to improve traffic safety along the corridor.Between late July and the end of September,120 community members responded to the survey.A summary of the results is provided in Attachment 4.The concerns expressed by survey respondents included: Top 3 Safety Concerns: City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 2 of 7 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0052 ·Drivers run/roll through stop signs ·Speeding Cars ·Pedestrian safety at intersections/crossings Most Requested Safety Improvement: ·Better Crossings What the Community Wants out of the Demonstration Project: ·Test ideas that slow down cars ·Make it feel safer to cross the street while walking/biking December Community Meeting-the community survey,walk audit results and draft concepts were presented at a virtual community meeting held on December 2.At that meeting,draft concepts for six different areas or intersections were presented for consideration along the corridor that ranged in demonstration project enhancements from sidewalk or curb extensions,crosswalks with pedestrian island,and a traffic circle/center median.After a presentation of the concepts during the community meeting,participants were asked to identify which concepts they were most or least interested in seeing demonstrated.The two concepts which generated the most interest were the concepts located at 9th/10th Street and 14th/15th Street and participants had an opportunity to ask additional questions and provide suggestions for adjustments to the concepts at those locations during the meeting. Project Webpage-a project webpage was established at the beginning of the project to provide the community with background information about the project,community meeting information,and updates as materials and concepts are prepared.A link to the project webpage is provided as Attachment 5. Analysis: Design Concepts With the input from the community meetings,the results of the community survey,and analysis of the corridor-including speed,traffic volume,and traffic collision data and field observations-City staff and the consulting team have worked to further refine the two concepts at 9th/10th Street and 14th/15th Street.The concepts have additionally been reviewed and refined with input from the Hermosa Beach Police Department,LA County Fire,and the City’s Traffic Engineer.Draft concepts were presented to the Public Works Commission in January 2021 and the revised concepts described below and illustrated in Attachment 1 reflect the concepts as recommended by the Public Works Commission: ·14th/15th Street-this concept includes curb extensions that improve pedestrian visibility and narrow the length of space needed for pedestrians to cross the street/interact with vehicles across Prospect and at streets that intersect with Prospect.This concept also proposes a new crosswalk across Prospect at 14th Street to provide residents east of Prospect with a safeCity of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 3 of 7 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0052 crosswalk across Prospect at 14th Street to provide residents east of Prospect with a safe pedestrian crossing where many cross from 15th Street toward 14th Street,which turns into Pier Ave at Pacific Coast Highway providing access to downtown and the beach.The crosswalk and curb extensions also help to provide a visual cue for drivers to slow down in this area where past speed surveys have indicated the 85th percentile speed is greater than 30 MPH (posted speed limit is 25 MPH).Materials would include a combination of paint and plastic delineators or rubberized curb.This concept would impact approximately 2 parking spaces in the vicinity. ·9th/10th Street-this concept includes a mini traffic circle at 10th street and curb extensions at both 9th and 10th streets to improve pedestrian visibility at the crosswalks.Due to the length of the intersection and offset design of 9th Street as it intersects with Prospect,these improvements aim to make pedestrians crossing the street more visible and improve stop/yield compliance by drivers.The mini traffic circle would be designed with approximately 16 feet of clearance and would also be designed with rubberized material that would allow the edges to be driven over if needed by emergency response vehicles.This concept is not expected to affect any parking spaces in this area. Environmental Determination: This project was assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),the State CEQA Guidelines,and the environmental regulations of the City. Under Section 15262 of the State CEQA Guidelines,this project is exempt as it is a feasibility or planning study for possible future actions which the City has not approved,adopted,or funded.This demonstration project is temporary in nature meant to provide the City data to identify,implement, and evaluate traffic safety demonstration projects along the Prospect Corridor.Additionally,the granting agency,SCAG legally requires the City to remove any improvements at the end of the study period,with the temporary nature of this project memorialized in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) . Further,this project is exempt under Section 15304 of the State CEQA Guidelines as it is a minor temporary use of land.The minor alterations in the form or traffic safety demonstration projects are temporary in nature and are legally required to be removed at the end of the study period. Finally,the project is exempt under Section 15061(b)(3)as there is no possibility that the temporary traffic safety demonstration projects may have a significant adverse effect on the environment.The temporary traffic safety demonstration projects are designed to improve pedestrian visibility to reduce traffic collisions and address speeding concerns along the Prospect Corridor. Next Steps: Following input and direction from City Council,the project team would prepare detailed engineering designs and information about the materials recommended for use at each demonstration location. The final designs would be provided to the City’s Traffic Engineer,Public Works Staff,Police City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 4 of 7 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0052 The final designs would be provided to the City’s Traffic Engineer,Public Works Staff,Police Department and LA County Fire for final review and coordination prior to the order and installation of materials. If approved by City Council,physical implementation of the demonstration concepts is expected to occur in March and be in place through June to allow time for the community and the project team to test,evaluate,and provide feedback on the demonstration elements and determine their effectiveness in addressing the key traffic safety concerns expressed by the community for this corridor. Once implemented,the community would be invited to utilize the improvements and provide feedback on the changes with signage and notifications providing information about the project and how to provide feedback.Community feedback would be incorporated into the evaluation of the improvements to inform long-term traffic safety considerations for the Prospect Corridor. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description September 17, 2017 Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Submission of a Grant Application to the Southern California Association of Governments for an Active Transportation Demonstration Project on Prospect Avenue March 10, 2020 Update on the Safer Prospect Project November 24, 2020 Update on the Safer Prospect Project General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: Mobility Element Goal 2.A public realm that is safe,comfortable,and convenient for travel via foot,bicycle,public transit,and automobile and creates vibrant,people-oriented public spaces that encourage active living. Policies: ·2.1 Prioritize public right-of-ways.Prioritize improvements of public right-of-ways that provide heightened levels of safe,comfortable and attractive public spaces for all non-motorized travelers while balancing the needs of efficient vehicular circulation. ·2.2 Encourage traffic calming.Encourage traffic calming policies and techniques to improve the safety and efficient movement of people and vehicles along residential areas and highly trafficked corridors.Goal 4.A parking system that meets the parking needs and demand of residents, visitors, and employees in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Goal 3.Public right-of-ways supporting a multimodal and people-oriented transportation City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 5 of 7 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0052 Goal 3.Public right-of-ways supporting a multimodal and people-oriented transportation system that provides diversity and flexibility on how users choose to be mobile. Policies: ·3.1 Enhance public right-of-ways.Where right-of-way clearance allows,enhance public right- of-ways to improve connectivity for pedestrians,bicyclists,disabled persons,and public transit stops. ·3.2 Complete pedestrian network.Prioritize investment in designated priority sidewalks to ensure a complete network of sidewalks and pedestrian-friendly amenities that enhances pedestrian safety, access opportunities and connectivity to destinations. ·3.9 Access for emergency vehicles.Ensure that emergency vehicles have secure and convenient access to the city’s street network. ·3.10 Require ADA standards.Require that all public right-of-ways be designed per Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)standards by incorporating crosswalks,curb ramps,pedestrian signals, and other components to provide ease of access for disabled persons. Goal 7.A transportation system that results in zero transportation-related fatalities and which minimizes injuries. ·7.1 Safe public right-of-ways.Encourage that all public right-of-ways are safe for all users at all times of day where users of all ages and ability feel comfortable participating in both motorized and non-motorized travel. ·7.2 Manage speeds.Monitor vehicle speeds through traffic controls,speed limits,and design features with the intended purpose of minimizing vehicle accidents,creating a pedestrian and bicycle environment, and discouraging cut-through traffic. ·7.4 Traffic safety programs.Prioritize traffic safety programs oriented towards safe access to schools and community facilities that focus on walking, biking, and driving in school zones. ·7.5 Appropriate sidewalk widths.Encourage design and construction plans that incorporate sidewalks that are consistent in width to match pedestrian activity. ·7.6 Pro-active traffic enforcement.Conduct pro-active traffic enforcement along streets where high collision rates, high speeds, and other unsafe behaviors are reported. Fiscal Impact: Implementation of the demonstration project is funded primarily through the grant provided and administered by SCAG.As part of the grant agreement,the City has a grant match commitment of approximately $55,000 to be provided through a combination of staff time and approximately $20,000 in equipment and material costs previously appropriated in the Capital Improvement Fund as part of the 2020-21 Budget. Attachments: 1.Hermosa Beach Public Works Commission Recommended Traffic Safety Demonstration City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 6 of 7 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0052 Project Concepts 2.Resolution No.__-Authorizing the Installation of the Temporary Traffic Safety Demonstration Project on Prospect Ave 3.Memorandum of Understanding with Southern California Association of Governments 4.Community Survey Summary Results 5.A Safer Prospect: Project Website and Additional Materials: <https://www.hermosabeach.gov/asaferprospect> Respectfully Submitted by: Leeanne Singleton, AICP, Environmental Analyst Concur: Lucho Rodriguez, Deputy City Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 7 of 7 powered by Legistar™ CONCEPTUAL DESIGN | 9 TH -10 TH STREET Treatment Type: Traffic Circle + Curb Extensions Parking Spaces Lost: 0 Materials: 1. White striping paint 2. Curb extension mural paint 3. Delineators 4. Planters (optional)10th S t ree t 9 t h S t ree t 1 6 '2'6"9'5'10th S t ree t 9t h S t r e e t 1 6 '2'6"9'5' Hermosa Beach Public Works Commission Recommended Design Concept CONCEPTUAL DESIGN | 14 TH -15 TH STREET Treatment Type: Curb Extensions + Midblock Crosswalk Parking Spaces Lost: 2 Materials: 1. White striping paint 2. Curb extension mural paint 3. Delineators 4. Planters (optional) 4' 4'15th Street14th StreetHermosa Beach Public Works Commission Recommended Design Concept RESOLUTION NO. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SAFETY DEMONSTRATION ELEMENTS ALONG THE PROSPECT CORRIDOR The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby find, order, and resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. 1. In September 2017, the City of Hermosa Beach applied for and received a grant award from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for the Prospect Corridor to identify, implement, and evaluate traffic safety demonstration projects along the corridor. The grant application was submitted following several traffic safety requests and concerns expressed by residents and parents of students that utilize the corridor to get to and from school. 2. The City of Hermosa Beach has adopted policy through the City’s General Plan Mobility Element and other initiatives related to living streets, safe routes to school, and expanded active transportation choices and the City desires to pursue a project that will implement these policies. 3. In addition to the evaluation of speed, traffic volume, traffic collision history data for the corridor, engagement efforts have sought to understand community preferences, concerns, and interest in testing changes to the corridor to improve traffic safety. Community engagement activities have included a community survey, community meetings, online engagement and written/email correspondence with members of the community. 4. A demonstration project along Prospect Avenue will support local mobility, safety, public health, and public participation initiatives, and provide low-cost measures to test and evaluate traffic safety improvements that may be implemented to enhance transportation choices and safety along the corridor for all users of the street. SECTION 2. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The installation of the temporary traffic safety demonstration projects on Prospect Ave is approved to be implemented between March through approximately June 2021. 2. The City Manager is authorized to sign the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Southern California Association of Governments for the temporary installation of the traffic safety demonstration project concepts from March through approximately June 2021. SECTION 3. Environmental Review. Implementation of the Demonstration Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under the statutory exemption 15262 as it is a feasibility or planning study for possible future actions which the City has not approved adopted or funded. This demonstration project is further exempt under Section 15304 as a minor use of land projects and temporary in nature meant to provide the City data to identify, implement, and evaluate traffic safety demonstration projects along the Prospect Corridor. Finally, as this is a temporary measure and as the improvements can be removed, there is no possibility that the demonstration project will have a permanent effect on the environment, making the project exempt under Section 15061(b)(3). SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Order is found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Order. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ___ day of February, 2021. __________________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: __________________________________________ CITY CLERK MOU No. : M-023-21 OWP No. : 225-4838X2.01 Page 1 of 12 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING No. M-023-21 BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS AND THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REGARDING THE HERMOSA BEACH SAFER PROSPECT PROJECT This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU” or “Agreement”) is made by and between the Southern California Association of Governments (“SCAG”) and the City of Hermosa Beach (“CITY”), for the purpose of partnering on the Safer Prospect Project (“Project”), to be implemented in the CITY, and as more fully described herein. SCAG and the CITY are individually referred to herein as “Party” and may be collectively referred to herein as “Parties.” RECITALS WHEREAS, SCAG is a Joint Powers Agency and a federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for Southern California. As an MPO, SCAG is primarily responsible for the development of a Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) for the counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Ventura; WHEREAS, SCAG received grant funds from the Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 3 Augmentation, to engage in the City of Hermosa Beach Safer Prospect Project; and WHEREAS, SCAG has retained Alta Planning + Design (“Consultant”) to undertake the Hermosa Beach Safer Prospect Project, as outlined in SCAG Contract Number 20-015; WHEREAS, SCAG seeks to partner with the CITY for the purpose of completing the Project to be implemented in the CITY; WHEREAS, the CITY agrees to partner with SCAG to pursue the Project based upon the terms and conditions set forth below; WHEREAS, SCAG shall contribute a maximum, not to exceed the amount of One Hundred Seventy Thousand and Fifty Dollars ($170,050) for the Project using ATP Cycle 3 Augmentation funds solely for Consultant support for the Project. SCAG shall not make any payments to the City for the services provided under this Agreement; WHEREAS, the CITY shall provide the services in accordance with the Scope of Work, incorporated herein by reference and attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this MOU is to describe the roles and responsibilities of the Parties, and shall supersede and replace any previous agreements between SCAG and the CITY related to the Project described herein. NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: MOU No. : M-023-21 OWP No. : 225-4838X2.01 Page 2 of 12 1. MOU Contents This MOU is comprised of these terms and conditions contained herein and any attached Exhibits, and may be amended only by written agreement between SCAG and the CITY. Such terms and conditions are subject to change. The Recitals to this Agreement are also incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Scope of Work a. SCAG is the sponsor and implementing agency for the Hermosa Beach Safer Prospect Project, and has retained Consultant (SCAG Contract Number 20-015) to perform the Project with the CITY. SCAG retains the right to include other sponsors for the production of the Project. SCAG is solely responsible for compensating SCAG’s Consultant for services rendered for the Project and shall provide general oversight of the Project. At all times, Consultant (or SCAG-approved subconsultants of Consultant) bears the responsibility of conducting all necessary tasks to produce the Project in accordance with the Scope of Work, as set forth in SCAG’s contract with Consultant. Consultant shall work with the CITY to facilitate production of Project including but not limited to the following: activation of temporary demonstrations at the intersections of 9th, 10th, 14th, and 15th Street and Prospect Ave. These demonstrations may include, but are not limited to, multiple curb bulbs, painted decorative crosswalks, and/or creation of temporary public spaces (e.g., parklets and temporary street furnishings). The Consultant shall work with the CITY and SCAG to create an intersection site plan to outline specific locations for these improvements. The Consultant shall work with the CITY to determine appropriate materials to demonstrate roadway improvements (e.g., paint, temporary bollards, signage with safety messaging, etc.). The Consultant shall coordinate with the City to secure appropriate materials as needed for the implementation of these improvements (paint, barriers, stencils, etc.) and is responsible for providing guidance to CITY Public Works staff for the implementation and conducting project evaluation following the implementation. b. The CITY is responsible for fully cooperating with SCAG and Consultant as may be reasonably necessary to produce the Project in accordance with the Scope of Work, as described in Exhibit “A”. The CITY will give any required decisions as promptly as practicable so as to avoid unreasonable delay. Cooperation by the CITY shall include, but is not limited to the following: making the CITY staff from appropriate departments (transportation, police, fire, building and safety, traffic control, engineering, public works, etc.) available to work closely with SCAG and the Consultant on the overall planning of the Project, securing necessary permits and approvals from relevant the CITY departments and/or agencies, determining any public safety requirements, traffic control requirements, developing a street closure and traffic management plan for the event, providing adequate staffing as requested by the SCAG Project Manager to implement the plan, determining the appropriate road diet configuration for the demonstration elements, securing necessary insurance, working with the Consultant to secure materials as requested by the SCAG Project Manager, securing temporary infrastructure improvements as requested by the SCAG Project Manager, and confirming that the temporary facilities comply with the CITY regulations. CITY is also responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the demonstration site and removal of project materials. MOU No. : M-023-21 OWP No. : 225-4838X2.01 Page 3 of 12 3. Term The Term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date of the Agreement and continue until June 30, 2021, hereinafter referred to as the “Completion Date,” unless terminated earlier as provided herein. Time is of the essence in the performance of services under this MOU. 4. Project Management a. All work under this MOU shall be coordinated with SCAG, SCAG’s Consultant, and the CITY through the Project Managers. b. For purposes of this MOU, SCAG designates the following Project Managers: Sam Zneimer Consultant Project Manager (213) 437-3369 samuelzneimer@altaplanning.com Hannah Keyes Southern California Association of Governments Senior Regional Planner (213) 236-1887 keyes@scag.ca.gov SCAG reserves the right to change this designation upon written notice to the CITY. c. For purposes of this MOU, the CITY designates the following individual as its Project Manager: Leeanne Singleton City of Hermosa Beach Environmental Analyst (310) 318-0252 lsingleton@hermosabeach.gov The CITY reserves the right to change this designation upon written notice to SCAG. 5. Independent Contractor a. It is understood that in the production of the Project, SCAG and Consultant shall be an independent contractor, and is not an agent or employee of the CITY. It is also understood that the CITY is an independent contractor, and is not an agent or employee of SCAG or Consultant. The Parties and Consultant shall retain the right to exercise full control over the employment, direction, compensation of its employees. SCAG shall be solely responsibl e for payment of Consultant for services rendered for production of the Project. b. Except as may otherwise be authorized in writing, the Parties or Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of or bind the other Party in any capacity whatsoever as agents or otherwise. MOU No. : M-023-21 OWP No. : 225-4838X2.01 Page 4 of 12 6. Ownership of Work SCAG shall keep all reports, plans, drawings, specifications, memoranda and other documents (“Works”) prepared by Consultant in furtherance of the Project on file and available for audit by the CITY for at least four (4) years after completion or earlier termination of this MOU. All title, copyright, and publication rights of Works are reserved to and are the exclusive property of SCAG. 7. MOU Changes a. No alteration or deviation of the terms of this MOU shall be valid unless made in writing and properly executed by both Parties. b. Either Party may request, at any time, amendments to this MOU and will notify the other Party regarding such changes. Upon agreement between the Parties as to the required changes, an amendment to this MOU shall be prepared regarding the same. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement regarding the changes requested by SCAG, the Parties may terminate this MOU in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 14(a) of this MOU. 8. Notices Any notice or notices required or permitted to be given pursuant to this MOU may be personally served on the other Party by the Party giving such notice, or may be served by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following addresses: To SCAG: Cindy Giraldo Chief Financial Officer Southern California Association of Governments 900 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone: (213) 630-1413 giraldo@scag.ca.gov To the CITY: Leeanne Singleton City of Hermosa Beach Environmental Analyst 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone: (310) 318-0252 lsingleton@hermosabeach.gov 9. Insurance SCAG has retained the Consultant to undertake the Project, as outlined in SCAG Contract Number 20-015, which indemnifies the CITY to the same extent as the Consultant is to indemnify SCAG. SCAG, Consultant, and the CITY shall, at their own expense, procure and maintain policies of insurance of the types and amounts below, for the duration of the MOU. The policies shall state they afford primary coverage. The minimum required insurance coverage required by the Parties and Consultant is set forth MOU No. : M-023-21 OWP No. : 225-4838X2.01 Page 5 of 12 below. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance – Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence form CG0001), or its equivalent. 2) Insurance Services Office form number CA0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto) or its equivalent. 3) Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance. 4) Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance – SCAG, Consultant, and the CITY shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: Including contractual liability insuring owned, non-owned, hired and all vehicles by SCAG, Consultant, and the CITY with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 applicable to bodily injury, or death, and loss of or damage to property in any one occurrence. 3) Workers’ Compensation Liability: Including Occupational Diseases in accordance with California Law and Employers’ Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each accident. 4) Professional Liability Insurance: With limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. In addition, it shall be required that the professional liability insurance policy remain in effect for six (6) months after the Completion Date or earlier termination of this Agreement. c. Other Insurance Provisions – SCAG, Consultant and CITY shall comply with the other insurance provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) SCAG, its officials and employees are to be covered as additional insureds, as respects to liability arising out of the activities performed by or on behalf of the CITY, products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to SCAG, its officials and employees. The CITY, its officials and employees are to be covered as additional insureds, as respects to liability arising out of the activities performed by or on behalf of SCAG or Consultant, products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; or MOU No. : M-023-21 OWP No. : 225-4838X2.01 Page 6 of 12 automobiles owned leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the CITY, its officials and employees. 2) For any claims related to this Project, the CITY’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance. If the CITY is a member of the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (JPIA), the CITY shall obtain Special Event Coverage (Nominee Program) from the JPIA and list SCAG and its Consultant as Co-sponsors and are to be named as additional insured. If the CITY is not a member of the JPIA, the CITY shall obtain special event coverage, or the equivalent, from its insurance provider and list SCAG and the Consultant as additional insureds. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to SCAG, Consultant, and the CITY. 4) Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. 5) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability policies shall contain the inclusion of SCAG and the CITY, their members, subsidiaries, officials and employees and shall provide a waiver of subrogation. d. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions – Any deductibles or self-insured retentions in amounts over $10,000 must be declared to and approved by SCAG and the CITY. e. Acceptability of Insurers – Insurance is to be placed with California admitted insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A and be admitted, unless otherwise approved by SCAG and the CITY. f. Verification of Coverage – Consultant shall furnish SCAG and the CITY with original endorsements and certificates of insurance evidencing coverage required by this clause. All documents are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All documents are to be received and approved by SCAG and the CITY before work commences. Upon request of SCAG or the CITY at any time, Consultant shall provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. Indemnity a. Except for the negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY and any of its officers, agents, employees, assigns, volunteers, and successors in interest, SCAG undertakes and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the CITY and any of its directors, officers, agents, employees, assigns, and successors in interest from and against any and all suits and causes of action, claims, losses, demands and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees and cost of litigation, damage or liability of any nature whatsoever, for death or injury to any person, including SCAG’s employees and agents, or damage or destruction of any property of either Party hereto or of third parties, arising in any manner out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions of SCAG, its officials, officers, employees, or agents in connection with the performance of the Project or this MOU, including without limitation the payment of all MOU No. : M-023-21 OWP No. : 225-4838X2.01 Page 7 of 12 consequential damages, expert witness fees and attorneys’ fees and other related costs and expenses. b. Except for the negligence or willful misconduct of SCAG and any of its directors, officers, agents, employees, assigns, and successors in interest, the CITY undertakes and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless SCAG and any of its directors, officers, agents, employees, assigns, and successors in interest from and against all suits and causes of action, claims, losses, demands and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees and cost of litigation, damage or liability of any nature whatsoever, for death or injury to any person, including the CITY’s employees and agents, or damage or destruction of any property of either party hereto or of third parties, arising rising in any manner out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions of the CITY, its officials, officers, employees, or agents in connection with the performance of the Project or this MOU, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages, expert witness fees and attorneys’ fees and other related costs and expenses. 11. Compliance with Laws The Parties shall comply with all Federal, State, County and the CITY laws, rules and regulations, in addition to Caltrans requirements applicable to this Project. 12. Disputes Except as otherwise provided in this MOU, if a dispute arises between the Parties to this MOU, the Parties hereto agree to use the following procedure to resolve such dispute, prior to pursuing other legal remedies: a. A meeting shall be held promptly between the Parties that will be attended by individuals with decision-making authority (to the extent reasonably possible), who will attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. b. If the Parties are unsuccessful in resolving the dispute under (a) above, they may: 1) agree to submit the matter to mediation, binding judicial reference, or a private adjudicator (if all Parties so agree); or 2) initiate litigation following advance written notice to the other Party of not less than thirty (30) days. c. If any Party should bring a legal action against the other to enforce the terms of this MOU, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction in said proceeding. 13. Noncompliance In addition to such other remedies as provided by law, in the event of noncompliance with any grant condition or specific requirement of this MOU, this MOU may be terminated. MOU No. : M-023-21 OWP No. : 225-4838X2.01 Page 8 of 12 14. Termination of MOU a. Termination for Convenience. Either Party may terminate this MOU at any time by giving written notice to the other party of such termination at least ten (10) calendar days before the effective date of such termination. In such event, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials as described in the MOU that belong to SCAG shall be returned to SCAG. Further, SCAG shall be responsible for any actual costs incurred by the Consultant as a result of such termination notice. b. Termination for Cause. If through any cause, the CITY shall fail to timely and adequately fulfill its obligations under this MOU, or if the CITY violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this MOU, SCAG shall thereupon have the right to terminate the MOU by gi ving not less than ten (10) calendar days written notice to the CITY of the intent to terminate and specifying the effective date thereof. SCAG shall provide a reasonable opportunity for the CITY to cure prior to termination. In no event shall such opportunity to cure extend beyond the term of the MOU. In the event that SCAG invokes this termination clause, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials as described in the MOU that belong to SCAG shall be returned to SCAG at its option. c. If through any cause, SCAG shall fail to timely and adequately fulfill its obligations under this MOU, or if SCAG violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this MOU, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate the MOU by giving not less than ten (10) calendar days written notice to SCAG of the intent to terminate and specifying the effective date thereof. The CITY shall provide a reasonable opportunity for SCAG to cure prior to termination. In no event shall such opportunity to cure extend beyond the term of the MOU. In the event that the CITY invokes this termination clause, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials as described in the MOU that belong to the CITY shall be returned to the CITY at its option. 15. Non-Assignment a. Neither Party shall assign this MOU, or any part thereof, without the written consent of each Party to this MOU. Any assignment without such written consent shall be void and unenforceable. b. The covenants and agreement of this MOU shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon each of the Parties and their respective successors and assignees. 16. Release of Information The CITY shall not release any information to a third party or otherwise publish or utilize any information obtained or produced by it as a result of or in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement without the prior written authorization of SCAG, except as required by law and with prior written notice to SCAG. 17. Severability If any provision of this MOU is held to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, in whole or in part, such provision shall be modified to the minimum extent necessary to make it legal, valid, and enforceable, and the legality, validity, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby. MOU No. : M-023-21 OWP No. : 225-4838X2.01 Page 9 of 12 18. Survival The following sections survive expiration or termination of this MOU: Section 6 (Ownership of Work) Section 10 (Indemnity) Section 12 (Disputes) Section 16 (Release of Information) 19. Jurisdiction and Venue This MOU shall be deemed an agreement under the laws of the State of California and for all purposes shall be interpreted in accordance with such laws. Both Parties hereby agree and consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of California and that the venue of any action brought thereunder shall be Los Angeles County, California. 20. Waiver No delay or failure by either Party to exercise or enforce at any time any right or provision of t his Agreement shall be considered a waiver thereof of such Party’s right thereafter to exercise or enforce each and every right and provision of this Agreement. A Waiver to be valid shall be in writing but need not be supported by consideration. No single waiver shall constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver. 21. Standard of Care The Parties shall perform the work required for the production of the Project under this MOU in accordance with generally accepted industry standards, practices, and principles applicable to such work. 22. Force Majeure Neither SCAG, Consultant nor the CITY shall be liable or deemed to be in default for any delay or failure in performance under this MOU or interruption of services resulting, directly or indirectly, from acts of God, civil or military authority, acts of public enemy, war, strikes, labor disputes, or any other similar cause beyond the reasonable control of SCAG, Consultant or the CITY. 23. Execution of MOU or Amendment This MOU, or any amendment related thereto (“Amendment”), may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement. The signature page of this MOU or any Amendment may be executed by way of a manual or authorized signature. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Agreement or an Amendment by electronic transmission scanned pages shall be deemed effective as a delivery of a manually or digitally executed counterpart to this Agreement or any Amendment. MOU No. : M-023-21 OWP No. : 225-4838X2.01 Page 10 of 12 24. Effective Date This MOU shall be effective upon execution by both Parties. 25. Entire MOU This MOU represents and contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the matters set forth herein. This MOU supersedes any and all prior negotiations, discussions and, if any, previous agreements between the Parties. MOU No. : M-023-21 OWP No. : 225-4838X2.01 Page 11 of 12 SIGNATURE PAGE TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING M-023-21 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the dates indicated below: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (“SCAG”) By: _______________________________________________ _________________ Cindy Giraldo Date Chief Financial Officer APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: _______________________________________________ _________________ Haviva Shane Date Counsel, Best Best & Krieger LLP CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (“CITY”) By: _______________________________________________ _________________ Suja Lowenthal Date City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: _______________________________________________ _________________ Michael Jenkins Date City Attorney MOU No. : M-023-21 OWP No. : 225-4838X2.01 Page 12 of 12 Exhibit A – Scope of Work Responsibilities of the City of Hermosa Beach Regarding the Hermosa Beach Safer Prospect Project The CITY, shall provide the following services: DEMONSTRATION ELEMENTS The CITY shall be responsible for the following tasks related to the Hermosa Beach Safer Prospect Project (“Project”) to be held between March 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021: ▪ Secure and provide to SCAG prior to the Project all necessary insurance to comply with SCAG’s minimum requirements identified under Section 9. Insurance, in the MOU; ▪ Secure necessary permits and approvals from relevant CITY departments and/or agencies and provide executed copies of the permits to SCAG for its files; ▪ Provide support for traffic control requirements, and support the development of a street closure and traffic management plan for the Project, and provide adequate staffing to implement the Project; ▪ Provide adequate staffing from the Department of Public Works to execute the Project; ▪ Confirm the appropriate street configuration for the Project; ▪ Coordinate and integrate with any existing events that will be happening during the Project; ▪ Provide any necessary maintenance of the demonstration site after the Project implementation; ▪ Remove all demonstration elements installed as part of the Project (demonstration elements may be retained by the CITY indefinitely, SCAG bears no responsibility for their removal). 2021 March April May June Set-Up/Project Implementation Evaluation A SAFER PROSPEC T Community Survey Summary The survey was opened on July 24, 2020 and open until Sept 30, 2020. SURVEY SUMMARY INFORMATION: Survey takers answered questions to better understand how people currently use Prospect Ave, what are the biggest safety concerns and what the community wants out of the demonstration project. 120 SURVEYSTAKEN TOP 3 SAFETY CONCERNS: Drivers run/roll through stop signs Speeding Cars Safety of intersections and crossings for pedestrian MOST DESIRED SAFETY IMPROVEMENT: Crossing Improvements WHAT THE COMMUNITY WANTS OUT OF THE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT: Test ideas that slow down cars Make it feel safer to cross the street while walking/biking HOW DO YOU USE PROSPECT AVE? I live on the street 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% I live nearby I work nearby My child attends school here I visit parks I use the street to reach other destinations in the city As an alternative to Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) I don’t use Prospect Ave. Other (please specify) HOW DO YOU TRAVEL ON PROPECT AVE? Walking 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Biking Skateboarding Driving I don’t travel on Prospect Ave Other (please specify) BELOW ARE SOME OF THE SAFETY CONCERNS THAT RESIDENTS HAVE SHARED WITH THE CITY. HOW IMPORTANT ARE THEY TO YOU? PLEASE RANK THEM IN ORDER OF IMPORTANCE. Speeding cars 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Drivers run/roll through stop signs Cut through traffic from the PCH Safety of intersections and crossings for pedestrians Not enough crosswalks Quality of existing crosswalks Crossing the major streets that intersect Prospect Ave. is challenging for those walking/biking Lack of designated space for people riding bikes on Prospect Ave Not enough trees, shrubs, or other greenery along the sidewalk I do not have any safety concerns HERE ARE SOME OF THE POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT IDEAS FOR PROSPECT AVENUE. THERE IS A PHOTO TO SHOW WHAT EACH ONE MEANS. WHICH DO YOU LIKE BEST? CLICK ALL THAT YOU THINK SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. Widen sidewalk to create more space 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Sharrows/Shared lane markings Crossing improvements Signage and wayfinding Flashing beacon at crossings Mini-Traffic Circle Shade trees and plantings Curb Extensions Chicanes Diverters THIS PROJECT AIMS TO CONSTRUCT A QUICK-RESPONSE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ALONG PROSPECT AVENUE. THE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT IS A SHORT-TERM, TEMPORARY WAY TO TRY OUT SOME IMPROVEMENTS AND SEE IF RESIDENTS LIKE THEM. HOW MIGHT YOU WANT TO USE PROSPECT AVENUE DURING THE DEMONSTRATION? Socially distanced walking/biking for exercise 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Test ideas that slow cars Make it feel safer to cross the street while walking/biking Improve the route to the local parks To commute to work or other destinations Extra space for kids to play Other (please specify) THIS PROJECT DOES NOT PROPOSE TO REMOVE A LANE OF PARKING THROUGHOUT, BUT THERE MAY BE AREAS WHERE REMOVING ONE OR TWO PARKING SPACES OR REMOVING A FEW FEET OF PARKING CAN IMPROVE VISIBILITY AND/OR SAFETY FOR PEOPLE WALKING, BIKING, AND DRIVING AT INTERSECTIONS, DRIVEWAYS, AND CROSSINGS. WHAT IS YOUR LEVEL OF SUPPORT FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO PARKING?: I would support adjustment or removal of a parking space or spaces at a few key locations to improve safety and visibility 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Support for adjustment or removal of any parking spaces would depend on the location and number of parking spaces affected I do not support adjustment or removal of any parking spaces anywhere along the corridor Other (please specify) ARE THERE ANY OTHER POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT IDEAS FOR PROPECT AVENUE YOUD LIKE TO SHARE? Prospecttraffic speed peoplespaceturnway think biking slow traffic slow go parking spaces discourage side issues intersection bike lane additional speed bumps lanes along need will crosswalks stop signs parking carsmakestops light reduce crossing Add street Narrow enforcement either DO YOU HAVE ANY FUN/CREATIVE IDEAS FOR EVENTS OR PROGRAMMING THAT WOULD HELP THE COMMUNITY USE PROSPECT AVENUE? BELOW ARE SOME IDEAS - PLEASE SHARE YOUR OWN! Sidewalk chalk coloring contest 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Jump rope station Socially distanced bike ride Scavenger hunt Teddy Bear Walk Front yard karaoke Other (please specify) ARE THERE OTHER SAFETY CONCERNS YOU'D LIKE TO SHARE? street seerunstopsigns dangerous unnecessary signSTOP residents change lot make safersafetyside slow 15th st cross Prospect walk safe 15th Street pedestrians cars Prospect stops many Also driver narrowspeeding cars sidewalk crossing will crossing street existing 15th corner crossswalk concern makecrosswalkusecarsparkedArtesia21stneardrivewaytryingfeelBeachalways aviation issues across parking west neighborhood residential street area spaceone waypeopletrafficspeed intersection need stop sign City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0080 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of February 9, 2020 AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS TO PROVIDE ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1.Award a Professional Services Agreement to Civil Works Engineers (CWE),Inc.,Onward Engineering,and to TAIT &Associates,Inc.,for an amount not-to-exceed $300,000 each,to provide on-call Engineering design services for street improvements to the City of Hermosa Beach for three years with the option to extend for up to two additional one-year terms; and 2.Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the Professional Services Agreement(s) subject to approval by the City Attorney. Executive Summary: The City has traditionally relied on Requests for Proposals (RFP)to fulfill the Engineering design services for street improvements service needs of the City.In light of the City’s desire to be nimble and efficient in its business processes,staff recognized the opportunity to re-envision the City’s approach to the provision of these services.Staff from the Public Works Department collaborated on the development of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ)that meets the Engineering design for street improvements service needs of the City and the community. A Request for Qualifications for On-Call Engineering Design for Street Improvements Services was issued on October 29,2020.As of the proposal deadline of November 19,2020,a total of 12 proposals were received.Staff reviewed the 12 proposals and recommends that the City Council award a series of not-to-exceed contracts to three qualified professional consulting firms to provide on-call Engineering Design for Street Improvements services as needed to the City for an amount not to exceed of $300,000 each over the next three years,with options to extend the contract length for up to two additional one-year terms. Background: The City has had a longstanding practice of hiring consultants based on Requests for Proposals to fulfill its Engineering Design for Street Improvements service needs.The RFP process requires a significant investment of time as staff engages in the RFP initiation,bidding,evaluation,award,and execution process each time the City needs engineering design services.Each RFP issued takes months to process,from drafting the RFP to execution of award.Given the aim toward continued City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0080 months to process,from drafting the RFP to execution of award.Given the aim toward continued business process improvements,staff continues to utilize the opportunity to streamline efforts in procuring consultant services. Consistent with the City’s desire to maximize efficiencies in its business processes,a team from Public Works collaborated on the development of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ)to meet the needs of the City and the community.The RFQ approach,which includes a formal competitive bidding and advertisement process,provides the City with a list of pre-qualified professional consultants to serve on the “bench”for the coming three to five years without the need to go out for an RFP each time the service is needed.This approach helps to expedite commencement of work and project delivery. Council approved the first set of on-call contracts for design services for street improvements in 2017 for a three-year term. These contracts have recently expired. Discussion: RFQ 20-06 was issued on October 29,2020,seeking proposals from qualified individuals or firms to provide on-call engineering design for street improvements services to support the function and needs of the City’s Public Works Department (Attachment 1).In order to provide context of the City’s needs,the RFQ included key statistics about the City’s infrastructure.The RFQ also included the City’s goals and expectations for community engagement related to the City’s infrastructure.The requested services for this RFQ included, but was not limited to the following: 1.Conduct an environmental assessment for each project and prepare all documentation required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); 2.Complete the design of projects including plans,specifications,and engineer’s construction cost estimate; and 3.Provide support services as needed during the bidding and construction phases of the project. On November 19,2020,the City received a total of 12 proposals.The complete list of firms that submitted proposals is provided in Table 1 below. Table 1 #Firm Name 1 Civil Works Engineers (CWE), Inc. 2 CSG Consultants, Inc. 3 David Evans and Associates Inc. 4 Huitt-Zollars 5 JMC2 Team 6 Kabbara Engineering 7 KCG 8 NV5 9 Onward Engineering 10 PacRim Engineering 11 PSOMAS 12 TAIT & Associates, Inc. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 2 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0080 Table 1#Firm Name 1 Civil Works Engineers (CWE), Inc. 2 CSG Consultants, Inc. 3 David Evans and Associates Inc. 4 Huitt-Zollars 5 JMC2 Team 6 Kabbara Engineering 7 KCG 8 NV5 9 Onward Engineering 10 PacRim Engineering 11 PSOMAS 12 TAIT & Associates, Inc. Staff from the Public Works Department reviewed and evaluated each proposal based on the criteria established in the RRQ: ·Approach and Methods ·Relevant Experience & Expertise ·Timeframe and Costs ·Administration Based on staff’s review of the proposals,three of the twelve firms were selected based on their overall approach and experience, and specific technical approach to each requested service. Based on the review of proposals,the reviewing panel recommends that City Council award a series of not-to-exceed contracts to a total of three firms.The proposals submitted by each of the recommended firms are provided in Attachment 2.The recommended firms are noted in Table 2 below. Table 2 #Firm Name 1 Civil Works Engineers (CWE), Inc. 2 Onward Engineering 3 TAIT & Associates, Inc. General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: Mobility Element Goal 1.Complete Streets that serve the diverse functions of mobility commerce,recreation, and community engagement for all users whether they travel by walking,bicycling,transit,or City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 3 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0080 driving. Policy: ·1.3 Monitor best practices.Consider applying the latest standards of best practices in the design,operation,and maintenance of the transportation network that is both attractive and functional. Infrastructure Element Goal 1. Infrastructure systems are functional, safe, and well maintained. Policies ·1.1 Infrastructure systems plan.Establish and adopt an integrated,holistic systems approach to guide infrastructure development, improvement, maintenance, and resilience. ·1.3 Right-of-way coordination.Ensure infrastructure maintenance and repair projects within the public right-of-way are coordinated with utilities and agencies to minimize additional roadway repaving or accelerated deterioration. Goal 2. Roadway infrastructure maintenance supports convenient, attractive, and complete streets and associated amenities. Policies ·2.1 Preventive street maintenance.Maintain streets,sidewalks and other public rights-of- way to provide a reliable network for circulation through a proactive preventive maintenance program. ·2.5 Active transportation dedications.Require new development and redevelopment projects to provide land or infrastructure necessary to accommodate active transportation, such as widened sidewalks,bike racks,and bus stops,in compliance with ADA accessibility standards. Fiscal Impact: Each agreement would be a not-to-exceed capacity contract amount of $300,000. Engineering Design for Street Improvements service costs are included in each CIP Project budget. Task proposals would be issued for individual project needs. Attachments: 1.RFQ 20-06: On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Imp. 2.Proposal -Civil Works Engineers (CWE), Inc. 3.Proposal -Onward Engineering. 4.Proposal - TAIT & Associates, Inc. 5.Fee Schedule -Civil Works Engineers (CWE), Inc. 6.Fee Schedule -Onward Engineering. 7.Fee Schedule -TAIT & Associates, Inc. 8.Fees Schedule Table 9.Draft agreement -Civil Works Engineers (CWE), Inc. 10.Draft agreement -Onward Engineering. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 4 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0080 11.Draft Agreement -TAIT & Associates, Inc. Respectfully Submitted by: Romany Basilyous, Associate Engineer Concur: Lucho Rodriguez, Deputy City Engineer Concur: Marnell Gibson, Public Works Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Charlotte Newkirk, Accounting Manager Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 5 of 5 powered by Legistar™ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 20-06 ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Department of Public Works 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0210 Page of 1 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach BID NUMBER: RFQ# - 20-06 BID TITLE: ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: Public Works – Engineering Division RELEASE DATE: October 29, 2020 DUE DATE: Thursday, November 19, 2020 @ 5:00 p.m. PST Notice is hereby given that the Department of Public Works of the City of Hermosa Beach will receive proposals. Each proposal must be submitted in a sealed envelope and clearly marked: “RFQ# 20-06, ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS” Failure to identify the proposal on the envelope may result in disqualification of the proposal. Sealed proposals must be submitted to the City Clerk Office at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA, 90254. Proposals will be received until 5:00 p.m. PST, Thursday, November 19, 2020. Proposals will not be opened at that time, but will be submitted to the Public Works Department for verification and compliance with Specifications and subsequent recommendation to City Council for award of a contract or rejection of the responses, as deemed appropriate. The City reserves the right to make no award. Proposals received after the deadline will be considered late. Such proposals may be returned unopened. Faxed or emailed proposals are not acceptable. Please direct any inquiries regarding this RFQ to Romany Basilyous, Associate Engineer at rbasilyous@hermosabeach.gov, by no later than 5:00 PM PST, Tuesday, November 10, 2020. Dated: This 29th Day of October, 2020 Page of 2 34 www.hermosabeach.gov CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA, 90254 Phone: (310) 318-0210, FAX: (310) 937-5015 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 ........................................................................................................................................... 1.1 Invitation for Proposals 4 ..................................................................................................................... 1.2 RFQ Timeline 4 .................................................................................................................................... 1.3 Submittal Procedures 4 ....................................................................................................................... 1.4 Contact 5 ............................................................................................................................................. 1.5 General RFQ Conditions 5 ................................................................................................................. 2. Scope of Work 9 ...................................................................................................................................... 2.1 City Location and Characteristics 9 ................................................................................................. 2.2 Project Goals 9 .................................................................................................................................... 2.3 Relevant Plans, Policies, Programs, or Projects 9 ............................................................................. 2.4 City Proposed Scope of Services 10 ................................................................................................. 3. Proposal Submittal Instructions 13 ......................................................................................................... 3.1 Proposal Format 13 ............................................................................................................................. 3.1.1 Hard Copy Proposals 13 .............................................................................................................. 3.2 Proposal Content 13 ........................................................................................................................... 3.2.1 Cover Letter 13 ............................................................................................................................. 3.2.2 Firm Profile 14 ................................................................................................................................ 3.2.3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work 14 .................................................. 3.2.4 Project Management Plan 15 ..................................................................................................... 3.2.5 Experience and Qualifications 15 .............................................................................................. 3.2.6 Required Forms 17 ........................................................................................................................ 3.2.7 Fee Schedule 17 ........................................................................................................................... 4. Proposal Evaluation and Selection 18 ................................................................................................... 4.1 Proposal Review Process 18 ............................................................................................................... 4.2 Evaluation Criteria 18 .......................................................................................................................... 5. Contract Expectations 20 ....................................................................................................................... 5.1 Contract Period 20 .............................................................................................................................. 5.2 Professional Services Agreement 20 ................................................................................................. 5.3 Standards of Work 20 .......................................................................................................................... 5.4 Invoicing and Payment 20 ................................................................................................................. 6. Attachments and Required Forms 21 .................................................................................................... 6.1 Maps 21 ................................................................................................................................................ 6.1.1 City Map 21 ................................................................................................................................... 6.2 Sample Professional Services Agreement 22 ................................................................................... 6.3 Required Forms 31 ............................................................................................................................... 6.3.1 Certification of Proposal 31 ......................................................................................................... 6.3.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit 32 ........................................................................................................... 6.3.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements 33 .......................................................................... 6.3.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement 34................................................... Page of 3 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 1 Introduction 1.1 Invitation for Proposals That the City of Hermosa Beach, Public Works Department is seeking Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) from qualified individuals or firms to provide On Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements. for the City of Hermosa Beach. Proposer(s) must have the expertise, experience, and demonstrate resources available to perform the work described in the RFQ. A copy of this RFQ may be found on the City’s website at the following location: https:// www.hermosabeach.gov/our-government/city-clerk/bids-and-proposals or by emailing the contact person listed below. Should an award be made, the selected Consultant(s) will enter into a professional services agreement with the City of Hermosa Beach to provide these services. The City anticipates a contract start date around January, 2021 and term of the agreement(s) shall be for three (3) years, with up to four (4) one (1) year extensions. Approximately 30 days prior to the end of each term, a meeting may be held between the consultant(s) and the City of Hermosa Beach staff to conduct a performance review, revise the scope and/or language of the agreement, and confirm consultant rate schedules. The initial agreement and each renewal will require City Council approval. This RFQ does not require consultants to address any specific projects or task orders. As actual projects arise, the City will solicit proposals from the selected on-call firms. A task order will be negotiated and executed between the City and the selected firm. 1.2 RFQ Timeline 1.3 Submittal Procedures Proposers shall submit one original and three copies in a sealed envelope or box bearing the name of the Proposer, marked RFQ # 20-06, submitted only to the following address: ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS (RFQ 20-06) City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk Office Attn: Romany Basilyous 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach CA, 90254 RFQ posted October 29, 2020 Deadline to submit written questions November 10, 2020 Posting of responses to questions November 13, 2020 Deadline to submit proposals November 19, 2020 - 5 PM PST Interviews (for selected firms)TBD Tentative award January, 2021 Page of 4 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach Proposes shall submit one digital copy of the proposal and one digital copy of the fee schedule in one USB drive. No proposals will be accepted after the listed date and time. All proposals must be clearly marked with the project title and RFQ number and submitted to the City Clerk Office of City of Hermosa Beach. Failure to identify the proposal on the envelope may result in disqualification of the proposal. The format, content, and procedures for submitting a proposal are provided in further detail within the RFQ. (Check Section 3 for complete submittal procedures) 1.4 Contact Please direct any inquiries regarding this RFQ to Romany Basilyous at rbasilyous@hermosabeach.gov. All questions regarding the content of the proposal should be submitted in writing to the listed email address and sent no later than the date and time listed in the RFQ Timeline. Responses to questions will be distributed to registered holders of this RFQ and posted to the City website. 1.5 General RFQ Conditions The following instructions and conditions apply to this RFQ: Pre-Contractual Expenses The City of Hermosa Beach shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by any consultant. In addition, no consultant shall include any such expenses as part of the price proposed. Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by bidders in: •Preparing a proposal in response to this RFQ. •Submitting that proposal to the City of Hermosa Beach. •Negotiating with the City of Hermosa Beach any matter related to this RFQ, proposal, and/or contractual agreement. •Any other expenses incurred by the consultant prior to the date of an executed contract. Authority to Withdraw RFQ and/or Not Award Contract The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to withdraw this RFQ at any time for any reason without prior notice. Further, the City makes no representations that any agreement will be awarded to any consultant responding to this RFQ. The City expressly reserves the right to reject any and all proposals in response to this RFQ without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s). The release of this RFQ does not obligate or compel the City to enter into a contract or agreement. Authority to Revise RFQ and Request Additional Information The City reserves the rights to amend the RFQ at any time, to determine the successful respondent(s), and to reject any or all Proposals or their components. Should it be necessary for Page of 5 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach the City to issue addendums to this RFQ during the proposal period, the City will notify the known holders of this RFQ and post addendums to the City website. Proposals shall acknowledge that the consultant is aware of all addendums which have been issued and has incorporated there provisions in their proposal by completing the Certification of Proposal Form. The City reserves the right, to request additional information or clarifications from consultants where it may serve the City’s best interest. Other Conditions •ADDITIONAL SERVICES. The Scope of Work describes the minimum work to be accomplished. Upon final selection of the firm(s), the Scope of Work may be modified and refined during negotiations with the City. Any proposer that provides additional services can include those services in the proposal and list them as additional services. •AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES. Every proposal must be signed by the person or persons legally authorized to bind the consultant to a contract for the execution of the work. Upon request of the City, any agent submitting a proposal on behalf of a consultant shall provide a current power of attorney certifying the agent’s authority to bind the consultant. •AWARD OF PROPOSAL. City reserves the right to negotiate final terms with the selected consultant, if any. Award may be made to the consultant offering the most advantageous proposal after consideration of all criteria. Should the selection criteria be requested, it shall be at the City’s discretion if the criteria is released prior to the final selection being made. •COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. All proposals shall comply with current federal, state, and other laws relative thereto. •CONFLICT OF INTEREST. By signing the Certification of Proposal, the consultant declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Qualifications , consultant declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. •DISQUALIFICATION OF PROPOSER. If there is reason to believe that collusion exists among the consultants, the City may refuse to consider proposals from participants in such collusion. No person, firm, or corporation under the same or different name, shall make, file, or be interested in more than one proposal for the same work unless alternate proposals are called for. Reasonable grounds for believing that any consultant is interested in more than one Proposal for the same work will cause the rejection of all Proposals for the work in which a consultant is interested. Consultants shall submit as part of their Proposal documents the completed Non-Collusion Affidavit. •EXAMINATION OF DOCUMENTS. It is the responsibility of the consultant to carefully and thoroughly examine and be familiar with these RFQ documents, general conditions, all forms, specifications, drawings, plans, and addendums (if any). Consultants shall satisfy themselves as to the character, quantity, and quality of work to be performed and materials, labor, supervision necessary to perform the work as specified by these documents. The failure or neglect of the consultant to examine documents shall in no way relieve the consultant from any obligations with respect to the solicitation for and subsequent contract that may be awarded. The submission of a proposal shall constitute Page of 6 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach an acknowledgment upon which the City may rely that the consultant has thoroughly examined and is familiar with the RFQ documents. The failure or neglect of a consultant to receive or examine any of the documents shall in no way relieve the consultant from any obligations with respect to the proposal. No claim will be allowed for additional compensation that is based upon a lack of knowledge of any solicitation document. •INTERPRETATION OF RFQ DOCUMENTS. City reserves the right to make corrections or clarifications of the information provided in this RFQ. If any person is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of this RFQ documents, or finds discrepancies or omissions in the document, the person may submit to the City a written request for an interpretation or correction. Oral statement(s), interpretations or clarifications concerning meaning or intent of the contents of this RFQ by any person are unauthorized and invalid. Modifications to the RFQ, including, but not limited to the scope of work, can be made only by written addendum issued by the City. Proposers shall submit all questions in writing to the contact listed in the announcement. Proposers may not contact any other staff members with questions. The requesting party is responsible for prompt delivery of any requests. When the City considers interpretations necessary, interpretations will be in the form of an addendum to the RFQ documents, and when issued, will be sent as promptly as is practical to all parties recorded by the City as having received RFQ documents. All such addenda shall become a part of the RFQ document. It is the responsibility of each consultant to ensure the City has their correct business name, mailing address and e-mail address on file. Any prospective consultants who obtained a set of RFQ documents are responsible for advising the City that they have a set of RFQ documents and wish to receive subsequent Addendums by contacting the City contact person listed in this RFQ. •IRREGULARITIES. City reserves the right to waive non-material irregularities if such would be in the best interest of the City as determined by the City Manager. •NON-DISCRIMINATION. Consultant represents and warrants that it does not and will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, gender, color, national origin, sexual orientation, ancestry, marital status, physical condition, pregnancy or pregnancy-related condition, political affiliation or opinion, age or medical condition. •NON-EXCLUSIVE. Should the City make an award, the successful consultant will enter into a NON-EXCLUSIVE professional services agreement and the City reserves the right to enter into agreements with other firms. •OFFERS OF MORE THAN ONE PRICE. Consultants are NOT allowed to submit more than one cost proposal. •OWNERSHIP. All data, documents and other products used or developed during the RFQ process become the property of the City upon submission. All bid proposals and documents submitted in response to this RFQ shall become the property of the City and a matter of public record pursuant to Government Code sections 6250 et seq. Proposals should not be marked as confidential or proprietary, and City may refuse to consider a proposal so marked. All Information contained within the proposals will become a matter of public record. It is the responsibility of each bidder to clearly identify any and all information contained within its bid proposal that it considers to be confidential and/or proprietary. To the extent that the City agrees with that designation, such information will be held in confidence whenever possible. All other information will be considered public. •PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. Prior to awarding any work, the selected Consultant will be required to execute a professional services agreement (sample attached) with the City. Any proposed change to the agreement shall be identified in the response to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and shall be subject to the sole Page of 7 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach approval of the City. The City requires the Consultant to obtain and maintain a policy of professional liability and other insurance as indicated in the agreement. •NO PUBLIC BID PROPOSAL OPENING/PUBLIC RECORDS ACT. Bid proposals shall be opened and its contents secured by City staff to prevent disclosure during the evaluative process and the process of negotiating with competing consultants. Adequate precautions shall be taken to treat each consultant fairly and to insure that information gleaned from competing proposals is not disclosed to other Consultants. Prices and other information concerning the proposals shall not be disclosed until a recommendation for award is made to the awarding authority. •PUBLIC RECORD. All proposals submitted in response to this RFQ will become the property of the City upon submittal and a matter of public record pursuant to applicable law. •REPRESENTATIONS. Consultant understands and acknowledges that the representations made in their submitted proposal are material and important, and will be relied on by the City in evaluation of the proposal. Consultant misrepresentation shall be treated as fraudulent concealment from the City of the facts relating to the proposal. •SEVERABILITY. If any provisions or portion of any provision, of this Request for Qualifications are held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, they shall be severed from the Request for Qualifications and the remaining provisions shall be valid and enforceable. •SUBCONTRACTOR INFORMATION. If the proposal includes the use of sub consultants, consultant must identify specific sub consultants and the specific requirements of this RFQ for which each proposed sub consultant would perform services. All sub consultant for work services must follow all required provisions of the prime contract. •VALIDITY. Proposal must be valid for a period of 90 days from the due date. •WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL. Consultants’ authorized representative may withdraw Proposals only by written request received by this RFQ contact personal before the Proposal Submittal Deadline. •BUSINESS LICENSE. The selected firm(s) must obtain a City of Hermosa Beach Business license and maintain a current certificate of insurance with the City for the duration of the Professional Service Agreement. Page of 8 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 2. Scope of Work 2.1 City Location and Characteristics The City of Hermosa Beach is located within the southwestern coastal portion of Los Angeles County in what is commonly referred to locally as the “South Bay” area. The City is bounded on the north by the City of Manhattan Beach, on the south by the City of Redondo Beach, on the east by the City of Redondo Beach and the City of Manhattan Beach, and on the west by the Pacific Ocean. The city limits for Hermosa Beach encompass a relatively small land area, approximately 1.4 square miles. Hermosa Beach includes nearly two miles of shoreline and varies in width between one-half mile and approximately one mile inland. Elevations in the City range from sea-level and rise up to 250 feet in elevation. In 2018, the City of Hermosa Beach had an estimated population of 19,673. The City plays host to several major special events held throughout the year and visitors can increase the population to over 100,000 people on an average summer weekend. Hermosa Beach contains: •19 parks that vary in sizes; •Community theatre, historical society museum, senior center, after school programming, and classroom facilities; •Recreation and community center, Museum, Senior center, Restroom facilities; •Civic Center including City Hall, Police Department, Library, and Fire Station; •Parking facilities including a parking structure; •Recreational buildings available for meetings and rentals; •Corporate Yard, and various structures. 2.2 Project Goals The City of Hermosa Beach is seeking proposals from qualified firms to provide Engineering Design Services to achieve the following goals: •Leverage the vision and goals of the recently adopted General Plan and the Community Decision-Making Tool; •Utilize a comprehensive approach to maintain, rehabilitate and improve the City’s infrastructure; •Provide the City with a range of Street Improvements services to meet the City’s capital improvement needs on an as-needed basis. 2.3 Relevant Plans, Policies, Programs, or Projects Proposers should review and consider the work already completed or underway in the development of approach, budget, and schedule. The following links are provided for your convenience: •PLAN Hermosa, the City’s Comprehensive General Plan and Local Coastal Program, adopted August 2017 •Hermosa Beach 2020/21 Capital Improvement Program, Page of 9 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 2.4 City Proposed Scope of Services The Scope of Work may include, but not be limited to the following tasks: 1.Research existing records of utility companies and agencies and coordinate the proposed improvements with existing field conditions. Including relocation of any Involved Utility facilities (Vaults, Vents, or underground structures that may be in conflict). 2.Prepare all documentation required to obtain permits from any and all agencies having jurisdiction of the project. 3.Conduct an environmental assessment for each project and prepare all documentation required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 4.Provide all field survey and topographic work necessary to complete the design effort. Design level survey and base mapping of the project site shall be prepared in US Customary English units by a California licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with the City guidelines and in AutoCAD Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) format. The horizontal datum shall be NAD 83 and the vertical datum shall be NAVD 88. 5.Complete the design of projects including plans, specifications, and engineer’s construction cost estimate. The Consultant shall contact manufacturers and/or contractors to verify the engineer’s estimate prior to submitting to the City. Specifications shall be prepared in Microsoft Word and an electronic copy of the final version shall be furnished to the City. The City will provide the specification boiler plate to the Consultant. 6.All preliminary and bid sets of plans shall be plotted on bond using the AutoCAD program. All drawings shall be completed per the City of Hermosa Beach CADD Standards. 7.All original plan sheets, the title sheet of the specifications, calculations, and reports shall be signed and stamped by the Consultant’s licensed (current through the remainder of the contract) professional engineer responsible/ in charge of the project. These signed originals will then become the property of the City. 8.The Consultant shall provide support services as needed during the bidding and construction phases of the project, including: A.The Consultant shall respond to bidder inquiries during the bidding process, including preparation of any addenda. Upon award of the construction contract, the Consultant shall attend the pre-construction meeting. B.The Consultant shall review and approve all submittals as needed and shop plan drawings required supporting the construction contract. The Consultant shall complete shop drawings reviews within one (1) week of receipt. C.The Consultant shall respond to written Requests for Information (RFI) as needed to provide clarification or resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Responses shall be completed within three (3) working days. 9.Upon the completion of construction, record drawings plans shall be submitted to the City. The Consultant shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision notations. Once plans have been updated, a signed set of record Page of 10 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach drawings mylars shall be submitted to the City with an electronic copy (in AutoCAD and pdf formats properly labeled) of the final record drawings via CD or e-mail. 10. The Consultant shall monitor the project progress, maintain project files, and control the quality of the work performed as needed. 11. Attend any and all meetings with the City staff as required. 12. Coordinate plan check, design topics, permits and any other issues with the City, other Agencies, and all utility companies as required. The Consultant shall be the liaison with affected agencies. 13. The Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing and approving addenda and clarifications to plans and specifications. 14. The appropriate consultant/firm responding to this RFQ must be able to provide “all” of the designated services not individual services only. 15. The Consultant is to provide any possible site resurfacing improvements including grading, grinding, asphalt and reinforced concrete paving, and Geotechnical investigations as needed for the design. Description of Required Services •All reports shall conform to criteria, policies, procedures and standards of Caltrans, APWA and the City, and shall be made available to the City at stages specified in the milestone schedule and upon request. •All original plan sheets, calculations, and reports shall be signed and stamped by the Consultant’s licensed professional engineer in responsible-charge of the project. These signed originals will then become the property of the City. •The Consultant shall be in responsible charge for the accuracy and completeness of the reports, plans, specifications and estimates prepared and shall check all such materials accordingly. The plans will be reviewed by the City for conformity with the requirements of the Agreement. Reviews by the city do NOT include detailed review or checking of design or the accuracy with which such designs are depicted on the plans. The responsibility for accuracy and completeness of such items remains solely that of Consultant. •The Consultant shall have a Quality Control Plan in effect during the entire time work is being performed under the Agreement. The Quality Control Plan shall establish a process whereby plans are independently checked, corrected and back checked, and all job related correspondence and memoranda dated and received by affected persons and then bound in appropriate job files. •Electronic files for all construction details and calculations shall be submitted at the end of the contract or when requested by the City. •All electronic software developed, databases generated, spreadsheets and intellectual properties developed during the life of the Agreement shall become the property of the City. •Consultant shall carry out the instructions received from the City and shall cooperate with the City and other involved agencies. Final Detail Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Page of 11 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach The Consultant shall submit the following documents for review and approval: Electronic sets of signed final design plans Electronic copies of signed final specifications Electronic files in its original format and in PDF of all plans, specifications, and estimates Manuals/Standards •Where applicable, Street Improvements services for design of all project shall be compatible and in accordance with the following: •Caltrans Highway Design Manual •Caltrans Standard Plans •Caltrans Standard Specifications •Los Angeles County Hydrology Manual •American Public Works Association Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction American Public Works Association Standard Plans •American Water Works Association •City of Hermosa Beach Standard Plans •The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) •Other standards as applicable. •It will be the responsibility of the Consultant to verify that it has received the latest version or update of these documents. •Plans for the improvements on the State Highway shall be prepared in accordance with Caltrans recommended practice for detailing and scope of work. Caltrans Standard plans shall be utilized where applicable and may be called out on the plans as reference. •Local street improvement and utility plans shall adhere to City of Hermosa Beach Standard Plans and the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. Plans shall be computer drafted in AutoCAD compatible format and shall adhere to the current City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Department CAD standards. •The Consultant’s work will be subject to inspections by representatives of the City, County, State and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Page of 12 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 3. Proposal Submittal Instructions 3.1 Proposal Format Proposals must be submitted in a sealed envelope or box bearing the name of the consultant, clearly marked, and submitted only to the following address: ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT (RFQ 20-06) City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk Office Attn: Romany Basilyous 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach CA, 90254 3.1.1 Hard Copy Proposals Proposers shall submit one original and three copies of the proposal for a total of five bound documents. One hard copy of the cost proposal (fee schedule) shall be in a separate sealed envelope, clearly marked “Cost Proposal”. Proposes shall submit one digital copy of the proposal and one digital copy of the fee schedule in one USB drive. If discrepancies are found between the copies, or between the original and copy or copies, the “ORIGINAL” will provide the basis for resolving such discrepancies. If one document is not clearly marked “ORIGINAL", the City reserves the right to use any copy of the proposals as the Original. All proposals shall be submitted on standard 8.5” by 11” paper and printed double-sided. Exhibits may be 11” by 17” paper as needed. Proposers should minimize the use of plastic film/ dividers and other materials that cannot be recycled. All pages should be numbered and identified sequentially by section. Proposals shall be no more than 50 total pages (25 double-sided pieces of paper) inclusive of the cover letter and all required forms. 3.2 Proposal Content Proposals must be concise, but with sufficient detail to allow accurate evaluation and comparative analysis. Proposals should be straightforward and provide "layman" explanations of technical terms that are used. Emphasis should be concentrated on conforming to the RFQ instructions, responding to the RFQ requirements, and on providing a complete and clear description of the offer. Proposals should include the sections as described in greater detail below. Do NOT include marketing brochures or other promotional material not connected with this RFQ. 3.2.1 Cover Letter Proposal must be accompanied by a cover letter, signed by an individual authorized to bind the proposing entity. An unsigned proposal is grounds for rejection. The cover letter should include an introduction of the firm, contact information, summary statement of professional qualifications, and statement of understanding of the scope of work. Page of 13 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.2 Firm Profile Proposers should provide a brief profile of the prime consultant and any sub-consultants. Information should include, but is not limited to the following information: •Official name and address. •Name, address, email, and telephone number of the consultant’s primary point of contact. •Type of business entity of consultant (corporation, company, joint venture, etc.). Please enclose a copy of the Joint Venture Agreement if entity is a joint venture. •Federal Employer I.D. Number. •Address, telephone numbers and fax numbers of each of the proposing firm’s locations. •Indication whether firm is totally or partially owned by another business organization (parent company) or individual. •Number of years consultant has been in business under the present business name. •Number of years of experience the consultant has had in providing required, equivalent, or related services. •Any failures or refusals to complete a contract, and explanation. 3.2.3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work Proposers should include in this section a statement of project understanding, organizational chart, approach to work program and summary of deliverables, described in greater detail below. Statement of Project Understanding Consultant must include in this section its understanding of the project and understanding of the Scope of Services noted herein. Consultant should be able to articulate a thorough understanding of the State, County and Local requirements, and other industry standards applicable to the project or services to be provided. Organizational Chart Consultant shall include an organizational chart that reflects key staff and roles/responsibilities of each individual assigned to provide services under this Proposal. Any roles or topics in which the proposer anticipates utilizing the expertise of subcontractors should be clearly identified. Approach to Work Program (Required and Optional Tasks) The City is seeking an effective, efficient and creative approach to preparing work products and meeting the City’s goals and timelines. In this section, proposers should include their recommended approach to providing the requested professional services and tasks noted in the Scope of Services in the RFQ. The approach to the work plan shall be of such detail to demonstrate the proposer’s ability to accomplish project objectives. This section should also Page of 14 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach include proposed approaches and techniques to engagement of community and stakeholders in the process of developing projects. The proposer’s approach should provide detail on both the required and optional tasks identified in the scope of work, as well as any additional tasks or services performed by the proposer. Additional Services Consultant shall provide the City with any additional services that the firm can provide. Consultant may additionally itemize those services which are further beneficial but are not noted in the aforementioned paragraphs as requirements. Roles and Responsibilities for City Staff Proposer should summarize any services NOT provided by their firm that are listed in the Scope of Work. Consultant shall also list any resources, City assistance or other items expected to be provided by City, “Work to be Performed or Provided by the City”. 3.2.4 Project Management Plan Key to a creative, effective, and efficient delivery of projects is close coordination and communication between the City, community, and the selected consultant. In this section, proposers should provide information on scheduling, and describe the firm or project manager’s approach to communications and quality assurance/quality control. Communications Approach Proposers should describe their recommended or preferred approach to project communications between the City and Consultant Team. This should include detail on the frequency of project check-ins, progress updates, and meeting locations (i.e. phone, email, in- person). Communications protocols for coordinating with other City departments, agencies, and the community can be established during individual project kick-offs. Consultant should have the capability to run virtual meetings during COVID-19. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Approach Describe the firm’s QA/QC processes that will be adhered to during the term of the agreement. Describe the Consultant’s method of ensuring that the assigned personnel’s quality of work is high. 3.2.5 Experience and Qualifications Proposers should include in this section a summary of relevant projects, contact information for references, and information about the experience, qualifications, and availability of key personnel, described in greater detail below. Summary of Relevant Projects Proposers should highlight representative projects that are similar in scope to the services requested to demonstrate the firm’s depth of experience and familiarity with similar projects. For each project, please include the following information, at a minimum: •Year started and completed (if relevant) •Contracting Agency + Department Page of 15 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach •Project Description •Key Personnel Assigned •Contract Value References Consultant must provide at least three (3) references for which consultant has provided services similar in scope as set forth in the RFQ within the last five (5) years. Reference information should include: •Name of agency •Name of agency project manager •Email address and telephone number of contact person •Description of project or services provided Experience and Qualifications of Key Personnel The consultant shall provide resumes indicating the experience and qualifications for the key personnel identified in the organization chart. Consultant shall also include the number and type of additional support personnel who will be providing services. At a minimum, the resume for each team member should include: •Name •Position and Role for This Project •Degrees and Certifications •Professional Memberships/Registrations •Summary of Experience •Work on Representative Project Similar in Scope If sub-consultants are to be used as part of this proposal, a resume of the sub-consultant and relevant experience is to be included in the same format. Assignment of Key Personnel It is the City’s preference to have the key personnel identified in the Organizational Chart remain with the individual project during its duration. In this section, please indicate the availability of key personnel to pursue completion of projects. After contract execution the Consultant should not substitute key personnel (project manager and others listed by name in the proposal) or sub-consultants without prior written approval from the local agency. The consultant must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from the agency prior to use of a different sub-consultant on the contract. The proposed substituted person must be as qualified as the original, and at the same or lower cost for geotechnical types of consultant contracts, the Consultant’s project manager shall have all the necessary credentials to qualify him/her as a project manager for this project. Page of 16 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach In the event there are proposed changes in key personnel, including sub-consultants, during the term of the agreement that are outside of the consulting firm’s control, the consultant shall prepare a transition plan that is presented to the City’s project manager for review. 3.2.6 Required Forms Consultant shall review, acknowledge and submit the following forms: •Certification of Proposal. Proposer is required to sign and submit the Certification of Proposal including acknowledgement that they have received and considered any addendums issued by the City of Hermosa Beach in connection with this RFQ. (See section 6.3.1) •Non-Collusion Affidavit. Proposer is required to sign and submit the Non-Collusion Affidavit. (See section 6.3.2) •Compliance with Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall demonstrate the willingness and ability to submit proof of the required insurance coverage as set forth in the Sample Professional Services Agreement. (See section 6.3.3) •Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement. Consultant shall demonstrate willingness and ability to comply with the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement and/or indicate any exceptions to the Professional Services Agreement. (See section 6.3.4) 3.2.7 Fee Schedule Printed fee schedule shall be submitted in a separate sealed envelope with the proposal, labeled “Fee Schedule” and indicate the firm’s name. Electronic copies of the fee schedule needs to be submitted in an an USB drive. Consultant should provide the fee schedule for the duration of the agreement to successfully fulfill the Scope of Work detailed in this RFQ. Required and optional tasks should be consistent with the tasks listed in the Scope of Services and be clearly marked in the fee schedule to facilitate consistent comparison of costs between proposals. The Fee Schedule should identify project team members, and hourly billing rates. The fee schedule should also include any direct costs such as travel, equipment, printing/materials. The fee schedule must also state if the proposed hourly rate(s) for key personnel is guaranteed for the term of an agreement (if awarded) or if it is subject to adjustments. If subject to adjustments, consultant must state the frequency of adjustments and how adjustments are determined. Page of 17 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 4. Proposal Evaluation and Selection 4.1 Proposal Review Process The City will evaluate all proposals received in accordance with the evaluation criteria. The City shall not be obligated to accept the lowest priced fee schedule, but the City may make award(s) in the best interests of the City after all factors are considered, including, but not limited to, the demonstrated competence, experience and professional qualifications of the Proposer. Evaluation scores will not be released until after award of proposal, if one is made. Following the review of RFQs by the City’s team, the City may invite short-listed consultants to be interviewed by a panel of City staff, which may include non-city personnel at the City’s discretion. Discussions may, at the City's option, be conducted with the most qualified Proposers. Discussions may be for the purpose of clarification to assure full understanding of, and responsiveness to the solicitation requirements. Proposers shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and written revision of proposals. In conducting discussions, the City will not disclose information derived from proposals submitted by competing Proposers. The City will verify references of short-listed consultants, which may include persons not listed as references, and this will help inform the City’s decisions. The City will select a consultant to negotiate for the performance of work. In negotiating the contract the City may request modifications to the proposed scope or to the technical team or other elements of the proposal. If negotiations fail, the City will commence negotiations with the next qualified candidate. Work will promptly commence following contract award and satisfaction of contract requirements. 4.2 Evaluation Criteria Evaluation criteria will typically include RFQ understanding, demonstrated expertise, relevant experience, availability of the firm’s team, and other factors. Task orders resulting from this contract will be negotiated and executed between the City and the selected firm. Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of their response to all provisions of this RFQ. The City of Hermosa Beach will use the following criteria in its evaluation of proposals, interviews may be required with selected consultants, or verification of references. The categories will be weighted approximately as follows. Approach and Methods (35%): •A well thought-out and tailored approach to the technical work that responds to the City’s particular issues and needs. •Incorporation of innovative and/or creative approaches for providing the services that will maximize efficient, cost-effective operations or increased performance capabilities. •Evidence of the team’s ability to work collaboratively with other members of a multi- disciplinary team in a complex and dynamic working environment. Page of 18 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach •Demonstration of the team’s commitment to accurate and superior work products and services as detailed in the project management project management plan. Relevant Experience & Expertise (40%): •Recent experience preparing similar projects or providing similar services for jurisdictions. •Familiarity and experience with applicable industry standards and any relevant federal, state, or local requirements. •The depth and appropriateness of experience of individual members of the technical team as they relate to the specific technical tasks called for by the project •The team’s experience and ability to clearly communicate technical concepts and terminology with the community. Timeframe and Costs (15%): •Display of responsive timeframe to assign tasks. •Evidence of the team’s ability to successfully deliver project tasks and deliverables within the identified project budget and minimize cost overruns. Administration (10%): •Ability to comply with the timeline terms, and billing procedures. •The extent and nature of any proposed amendments to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. Page of 19 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 5. Contract Expectations 5.1 Contract Period The City anticipates the contract term would begin around January, 2021 and would include an initial term of three years, with the option for up to four (4) one-year extensions of the contract. 5.2 Professional Services Agreement The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City’s Professional Services Agreement. Proposers should identify and/or indicate any exceptions to the Sample Professional Services Agreement included in Section 6.2. The City Attorney or their designee retains the discretion to accept or reject proposed exceptions or modifications to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. 5.3 Standards of Work Approximately 30 days prior to the end of each term, a meeting may be held between the consultant(s) and the City of Hermosa Beach staff to conduct a performance review, revise the scope and/or language of the agreement, and confirm consultant rate schedules. The initial agreement and each renewal will require City Council approval. In case of conflicts, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors, or omissions, Consultant shall submit the matter to City for clarification. Any work affected by such conflicts, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors or omissions which is performed by Consultant prior to clarification by City shall be at Consultant's risk and expense. 5.4 Invoicing and Payment The task order for each project resulting from this on-call contract will be set up as a not to exceed rate to be billed monthly based on hours worked. The invoices shall reference the project title, and must list the charges by task, worker classification, hours, billing rate, and totals. Back up information must be submitted together with the invoices. Each invoice shall contain a progress report describing the work completed during the billing period and shall also include cost information by task regarding: previous work billed to date, work billed during the reporting period, percent of task completed and amount remaining by task. Page of 20 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 6. Attachments and Required Forms 6.1 Maps 6.1.1 City Map Page of 21 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 6.2 Sample Professional Services Agreement CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO ________________________________________________________________ BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND ___________________________ This AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 2021, by and between the CITY OF ___________________, a general law city a municipal corporation (“CITY”) and _, a limited liability company (“CONSULTANT”). R E C I T A L S A.The City desires to __________________________________________. B.The City does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services required under this agreement and therefore, the City desires to contract for consulting services to accomplish this work. C.The Consultant warrants to the City that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement. D.The City desires to contract with the Consultant to perform the services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, the City and the Consultant agree as follows: 1.CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as EXHIBIT A. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a total of $ , for CONSULTANT’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each month, its invoice for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous month. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT all uncontested amounts set forth in CONSULTANT’s invoice within 30 days after it is received. 2.SCOPE OF SERVICES. CONSULTANT will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF SERVICE attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. Page of 22 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. 3.PAYMENTS . For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period in accordance with the schedule of compensation incorporated in “Exhibit A.” 4.TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of the CONTRACTOR are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from the CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is completed to the CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in “Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing by the CITY. 5.FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. 6.KEY PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT’s key person assigned to perform work under this Agreement is ________________. CONSULTANT shall not assign another person to be in charge of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City. 7.TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on __________, 20___, unless earlier termination occurs under Section 11 of this Agreement, or this Agreement is extended in writing in advance by both parties. 8.CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. 9.TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 10.PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONTRACTOR will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. 11.TERMINATION. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days before the effective termination date. In the event of such termination, the CONTRACTOR shall cease services as of the date of termination, and all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other Page of 23 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach materials prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. 12.INDEMNIFICATION. CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by CITY, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, and cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT's performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT, regardless of CITY’S passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage which is caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY. Should CITY in its sole discretion find CONSULTANT’S legal counsel unacceptable, then CONSULTANT shall reimburse the CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. The CONSULTANT shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 17, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification. 13.ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT’s professional services. CONSULTANT’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 14.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only. 15.AUDIT OF RECORDS. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement. Page of 24 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement. 16.CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement. CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by the City to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective measures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement. 17.INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. A.The CONSULTANT, at the CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies: 1.Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. The Consultant shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the CONTRACTOR for City. 2.General Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. 3.Automobile Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the CONSULTANT arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. 4.Professional Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from the CONSULTANT’S operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by the CONSULTANT or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. Page of 25 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach B.Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California, or which is approved in writing by City, and shall be endorsed as follows. CONSULTANT also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 1.“The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.” 2.This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self-insured retention the CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy. 3.This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. 4.The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents. 5.Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. 6.The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the CITY. C.CONSULTANT agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY. D.Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. At the CITY’s option, the CONSULTANT shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. E.The CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement. F.Failure on the part of the CONSULTANT to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11 above. G.The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or Page of 26 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach deductible of the policy in lieu of the Consultant (as the named insured) should Consultant fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. Consultant understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by Consultant as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City pay the SIR or deductible on Consultant’s behalf upon the Consultant’s failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any action against Consultant for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by City due to the breach. 18.USE OF OTHER CONSULTANTS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY’s prior written approval to use any sub-consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must include approval of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. 19.FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the CONSULTANT of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of the CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONSULTANT for anything done, furnished or relating to the CONSULTANT’S work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of the CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by the CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of the CONSULTANT, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by the CITY for any defect or error in the work prepared by the Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents. 20.CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the CONSULTANT shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during the City’s review of the Consultant’s report or plans. Should the Consultant fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by the CITY, and the cost thereof shall be charged to the CONSULTANT. In addition to all other available remedies, the City may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by the City or may withhold payment otherwise owed CONSULTANT under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction. 21.NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONSULTANT by CITY for services preformed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of CONSULTANT’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover payment for CONSULTANT’S services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year. Page of 27 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 22.NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of notices may be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or personally delivered as specified in this Section. A.SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. B.THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT’s or CITY’s obligations under this Agreement. C.INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County. D.ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. E.RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. F.AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY. CITY CONSULTANT City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ATTN: ATTN: Page of 28 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 23.ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Contract, agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission or scanned and delivered via electronic mail. Such facsimile or electronic mail copies will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 24.FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other. 25.TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided. 26.ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled. 27.STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency. 28.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. It is understood and agreed that the City shall own all documents and other work product of the Consultant, except the Consultant’s notes and workpapers, which pertain to the work performed under this Agreement. The City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the Consultant, but any re-use of such documents by the City on any other project without prior written consent of the Consultant shall be at the sole risk of the City. 29.DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (City and Consultant initials required at one of the following paragraphs) By their respective initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is a “consultant” for the purposes of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties would require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions set forth in Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation 18701(a)(2) or otherwise serves in a staff capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were Consultant employed by the City. Consultant hereby acknowledges his or her assuming-office, annual, and leaving-office financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at his or her expense. Prior to consultant commencing services hereunder, the City’s Manager shall prepare Page of 29 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach and deliver to consultant a memorandum detailing the extent of Consultant’s disclosure obligations in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials ______ Consultant Initials ______ OR By their initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is not a “consultant” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of consultant in Fair Political Practice Commission Regulation 18701(a)(2)(A) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials ______ Consultant Initials ______ IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first herein above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT MAYOR By:TITLE ATTEST: Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Jenkins , City Attorney Page of 30 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3 Required Forms 6.3.1 Certification of Proposal RFQ #: _________ The undersigned hereby submits its proposal and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFQ). 1.Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Proposal, Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. 2.By submitting the response to this request, Proposer agrees, if selected to furnish services to the City in accordance with this RFQ. 3.Proposer has carefully reviewed its proposal and understands and agrees that the City is not responsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the Proposer and that the Proposer is responsible for them. 4.It is understood and agreed that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals and to waive any informality or irregularity in any proposal received by the City. 5.The proposal response includes all of the commentary, figures and data required by the Request for Proposal 6.The proposal shall be valid for 90 days from the date of submittal. 7.Proposer acknowledges that the City may issue addendums related to this RFQ and that the proposer has reviewed the following addendums which have been issued: Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ 8. Proposer further acknowledges the provisions of any addendums issued have been incorporated into their proposal. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 31 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit RFQ #: _________ The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.This proposal is not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation. 2.This proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham. 3.I have not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Proposer to put in a false or sham proposal and I have not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any other Proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal or to refrain from submitting to this RFQ. 4.I have not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the proposal price or to secure any advantage against the City of Hermosa Beach or of anyone interested in the proposed contract. 5.All statements contained in the Proposal and related documents are true. 6.I have not directly or indirectly submitted the proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any person, corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, RFQ depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. 7.I have not entered into any arrangement or agreement with any City of Hermosa Beach public officer in connection with this proposal. 8.I understand collusive bidding is a violation of State and Federal law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 32 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements RFQ #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with the City’s insurance requirements contained within this RFQ. The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the insurance requirements as specified in the Request for Proposal. 2.If selected, proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 33 34 RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement RFQ #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City’s Professional Services Agreement. Proposers should identify and/or indicate any exceptions to the Sample Professional Services Agreement included in Section 6.2. The City Attorney or their designee retains the discretion to accept or reject proposed exceptions or modifications to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the conditions specified in the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement. 2.Proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein with exceptions noted as follows: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 34 34 On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.1 - 0 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com PREPARED FOR: City of Hermosa Beach Attn: City Clerk 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 PREPARED BY: Civil Works Engineers, Inc. 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714.966.9060 www.civilworksengineers.com Proposal for the On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements RFQ# 20-06 November 19, 2020 ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.1 - 1 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com 3.2.1 Cover Letter November 19, 2020 City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk Office Attn: Romany Basilyous 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements (RFQ# 20-06) The City of Hermosa Beach is seeking proposals from qualified firms to provide Engineering Design Services to achieve their adopted goals which include leveraging the vision and goals of the recently adopted General Plan and the Community Decision-Making Tool, utilizing a comprehensive approach to maintain, rehabilitate and improve the City’s infrastructure, and providing the City with a range of Street Improvements services to meet the City’s capital improvement needs on an as-needed basis. Civil Works Engineers, Inc. (CWE) has assembled a team of professionals who can assist the City in meeting their identified goals and have previously performed a wide variety of street improvement projects for southern California agencies, providing quality and service during the design development. CWE’s Project Managers and Engineers have been serving the southern California area providing a variety of engineering services for over 15 years and longer at previous employers. We respectfully present our proposal to the City of Hermosa Beach for the On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements contract. We specialize in the engineering planning and design of public works improvement projects including but not limited to street improvements including rehabilitations, intersections, and widenings/narrowings, complete streets, green streets, ADA upgrades, drainage analysis and upgrades, and traffic design services. Our staff of professional civil engineers, backed by our expert subconsultants, has considerable experience preparing preliminary and final engineering design for public agencies, meeting all agency requirements. We have successfully completed projects for the following agencies: • City of Azusa • City of Buena Park • City of Corona • City of Costa Mesa • City of Downey • City of Glendale • City of Irvine • City of Laguna Beach • City of La Mirada • City of Lake Forest • City of Lomita • City of Newport Beach • City of Pasadena • City of Riverside • City of San Gabriel • City of Santa Ana • City of Ventura • City of Yorba Linda • California State University, Fullerton • Caltrans District 7, 8, & 12 • County of Orange • Eastern Municipal Water District • Loma Linda University • Los Angeles Metro • SBCTA In our proposal, CWE demonstrates its qualifications, experience, technical approach, and commitment to quality control. Our experienced engineers with their relevant experience, project understanding, commitment to quality deliverables along with our customer service is what makes our team special. The CWE team is the best fit for this project for the following reasons: ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.1 - 2 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com Approach and Methods i. We understand the needs for the technical work demonstrated in our work approach ii. Our demonstrated technical competence and creative ability in previous street projects iii. Our Team is accustomed to working collaboratively among all disciplines and stakeholders iv. Company commitment to quality and service in line with our project management plan Relevant Experience & Expertise i. We have many examples of our previous similar experience ii. We are very knowledgeable in APWA Greenbook Standard Plans and Specifications as well as Caltrans iii. Our Project Manager with 20 years of experience will be overseen by our Principal with 40 years of experience iv. We have previous experience communicating technical concepts and terminology with the community Timeframe and Costs i. Our team is timely in our response to assigned tasks ii. We deliver projects within budget, minimizing overruns by ensuring a solid understanding of the project scope Administration i. We commonly tailor our billing procedures to each agency’s needs ii. We take no exceptions to the City’s professional services agreement Civil Works Engineers is led by me, the sole principal and the company president. We have assigned Mr. Ricky Chan as the proposed project manager and project engineer for this assignment. Ricky Chan is both a licensed civil engineer and traffic engineer and has 20 years of experience in roadway, traffic, and municipal engineering projects. He has designed more than 200 preliminary and final desi gn traffic signal projects in southern California. His well -rounded experience in street improvement projects includes pavement rehabilitations, roadway geometrics as required for widenings/narrowings , median modifications, traffic signals, signing and striping, construction staging and traffic handling, ADA compliance, and utility design. We are committed to providing the City with high quality work, personalized service, and timely delivery for the design of any street improvement project. We look forward to the opportunity to provide our services to the City of Hermosa Beach. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, Marie Marston, P.E. President mmarston@civilworksengineers.com ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 1 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com 3.2.2 Firm Profile Civil Works Engineers, Inc. (CWE) is a professional civil engineering consulting firm formed in 2005 and based in Costa Mesa, California. Our staff has a tremendous amount of experience preparing preliminary and final civil and traffic engineering for roadway improvements for municipalities, counties, and transportation agencies meeting all agency requirements. We have a wide variety of transportation experience that encompasses civil and traffic roadway planning and design for improvement projects, ranging among rehabilitation projects, roadway widenings, roadway narrowings, intersection improvements, ADA compliance, interchange improvements, and reconstruction of arterial highway and freeway projects. CWE is an individually owned small professional civil engineering consulting firm providing services primarily for public clients. We provide project development from project inception through design and ultimately through construction. Quality of work and client satisfaction are our primary focus. We focus o n exceeding our clients’ expectations by maintaining close personal contact, keeping the client informed of the project status, responding immediately to problems that arise and, ultimately, delivering a timely completion to the project within the clients’ budget. We have maintained long-term clients over numerous years, demonstrating their satisfaction with CWE’s services. Our success is founded on experience, knowledge, and preparation of clear and communicative technical documents through a collaborative and coordinated approach with all project stakeholders. CWE has been in business for over 15 years. The principal of CWE has 40 years of providing the required, equivalent, or related services. We are a California Subchapter S Corporation, formed in March 2005. Civil Works Engineers has not had any failures or refusals to complete a contract. We have never been involved with claims or a litigation. We are a certified DBE, SBE, and WBE firm. Our contact information: Marie Marston Civil Works Engineers, 3151 Airway Ave, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa, CA 92626, Office: (714) 966-9060 Fax: (714) 966-9085 Federal Employer ID Number: 71-0979082 PROJECT TEAM We have assembled a project team which will be capable of responding to any of the City’s needs in on-call engineering design service as identified in the RFQ. We have previously worked with these firms in the roles they would be assigned and verified that each team member currently has the resources available. We have assembled the following Project Team: Civil Works Engineers Project Management, Civil Engineering, Water Quality, Drainage, Utility, Specs, Estimates Saddleback Surveys Surveying & Mapping, Right of Way Engineering Leighton Geotechnical Engineering ICF Environmental Documentation ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 2 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com This project team has worked together previously on numerous assignments. We assembled our team based on successful past project relationships, previous similar project experience, and the needed disciplines for the City’s projects. We have successfully completed projects with each subconsultant firm. SUBCONSULTANTS Below is a summary of the information requested in the RFQ for each subconsultant firm and an overview of their role. Saddleback Surveys Inc., (SBS) is a Land Surveying, Mapping and Geospatial firm offering innovative solutions since 2004. SBS offers some of the latest technologies available. SBS staff has a broad range of project experience including but not limited to: Topographic and Design Surveys, Construction Staking for New and Existing Construction, Terrestrial and Mobile LiDAR Scanning, Boundary Surveys, Right-of-Way and Encumbrance Mapping, ALTA/NPRS Surveys, Legal Descriptions, Plats and Subdivision Map preparation and GPS Network Design. Saddleback Surveys will provide surveying services, right of way engineering, mapping, legal description and construction staking. Their approach is to provide the city quality staffing for all survey task assignments. All Saddleback Surveys’ designated staff have extensive experience in providing these services within schedule and negotiated budgets. Civil Works Engineers and Saddleback Surveys are currently working together on the Santa Ana Public Library Renovation project. Leighton Consulting, Inc. (Leighton) is an award-winning engineering firm recognized by Engineering News-Record (ENR) as a 2020 Top Design Firm in the United States. Leighton has provided geotechnical and environmental services as a subconsultant to CWE on several projects completing over 30 task order projects and providing geotechnical, environmental, materials testing and inspection services. Leighton will provide geotechnical engineering services, site investigation, site soil sampling, laboratory testing, data analysis, pavement thickness calculations, and report preparation. Civil Works Engineers and Leighton are currently working together on the I-605 Beverly Boulevard interchange improvement project and the Boyle Avenue remediation excavation plan. Official Name and Address: Saddleback Surveys, 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92691 Primary Point of Contact: Rick Tetreault, 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92691, rtetreault@saddlebacksurveys.com, (949) 215-8630 (p), (949) 215-8631 (f) Business Type: C Corporation Federal ID Number: PW-LR01000465125 Additional Locations: No Owned by Another Business or Individual: No In Business Under the Present Name: 16 years Experience Providing Required, Equivalent, or Related Services: 16 years Any Failures or Refusals: No ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 3 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com Founded in 1970, ICF is a local multidisciplinary environmental consulting firm with a long-standing reputation of excellence in environmental analyses in compliance with CEQA and NEPA for road and highway projects throughout southern California. As such, ICF has a firm understanding of environmental laws and regulations, and they bring this knowledge to their role on the project. ICF is intimately familiar with requirements related to CEQA and NEPA and has extensive experience performing environmental tasks related to monitoring activities. They bring experience providing air quality and noise expertise as part of CEQA and NEPA requirements, as well as biological and cultural services required for monitoring activities under CEQA and NEPA. ICF will provide environmental engineering services, environmental assessment for each project, permit application and obtainment, and all documentation required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). ICF and CWE are currently working together on the Los Angeles Union Station Forecourt and Esplanade Improvements. We also worked together on the Pepper Avenue street extension and new interchange on SR 210 project. Official Name and Address: Leighton Consulting, Inc., 17781 Cowan Irvine, CA 92614 (949) 250-1421 (p), (949) 250-1114 (f) Primary Point of Contact: Djan Chandra PE, GE, 17781 Cowan Irvine, CA 92614, dchandra@leightongroup.com, (949) 681-4267 Business Type: Corporation Federal ID Number: 731650031 Additional Locations: Rancho Cucamonga, 10532 Acacia Street Suite B-6 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 484-2205 (p), (909) 484-2170 (f) San Diego, 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite B-205 San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 292-8030 (p), (858) 292-0771 (f) Los Angeles, 611 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1404 Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 892-1530 (p), (213) 892-1563 (f) Temecula, 41715 Enterprise Circle N, Suite 103 Temecula, CA 92590 (951) 296-0530 (p), (951) 296-0534 (f) Santa Clarita, 26074 Avenue Hall, Suite 21 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 (661) 257-7434 (p), (661) 257-7430 (f) Ventura, 56 East Main Street, Suite 207 Ventura, CA 93001 (805) 654-9257 (p), (805) 620-1977 (f) Palm Desert, 41945 Boardwalk, Suite V Palm Desert, 92211 (760) 776-4192 (p), (760) 776-4080 (f) Owned by Another Business or Individual: No In Business Under the Present Name: 18 years Experience Providing Required, Equivalent, or Related Services: 59 years Any Failures or Refusals: No ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 4 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com CIVIL WORKS ENGINEERS DIFFERENTIATORS We have a broad range of expertise for a small firm having prepared roadway geometrics, drainage, stormwater, water, sewer, traffic engineering, grading, and utilities designs for a variety of projects. Our project team has successfully designed numerous public works projects for cities, counties, and Caltrans throughout southern California. We have both extensive municipal experience and extensive Caltrans experience. CWE provides senior engineers and principal involvement on every project. Our managers use a “hands-on” management style. We are flexible in both small and large assignments having worked on projects with fees ranging from $3,000 to $3,000,000. We are very familiar with the latest APWA standards, “Greenbook” standard plans and standard specifications, state and federal laws for ADA compliance, and Caltrans design procedures, standards and policies. We focus on quality deliverables and responsive client service. Our project team has previously worked together to successfully complete numerous similar projects giving us the experience and depth of knowledge to meet the City’s needs. CIVIL WORKS ENGINEERS STRENGTHS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN Official Name and Address: ICF International, Inc., 49 Discovery, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92618 Primary Point of Contact: Brian Calvert, 49 Discovery, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92618, Brian.Calvert@icf.com, (949) 333-6600 (p), no fax Business Type: Corporation Federal ID Number: 94-1730361 Additional Locations: Corona, 1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 406, Corona, CA 92879 (951) 493-0060 (p), (951) 905-1458 (f) Los Angeles, 555 W. Fifth Street, Suite 3100, Los Angeles, CA 90013 (213) 312-1800 (p), (213) 344-4572 (f) 2049 Century Park East, Suite 690, Los Angeles, CA 90067 No Phone, No Fax San Diego, 525 B Street, Suite 1700, San Diego, CA 92101 (858) 578-8964 (p), (844) 545-2301 (f) Owned by Another Business or Individual: ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of ICF International, Inc. In Business Under the Present Name: 51 years Experience Providing Required, Equivalent, or Related Services: 51 years Any Failures or Refusals: No ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 5 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com Our small firm approach will assure the City of the importance of their project within our firm and the resulting tailored and responsive service. We will ensure the team has the available quality staff resources to respond to the City’s potential projects. Our project manager will closely monitor the project team staffing status throughout the entire project duration. Continuity of personnel is assured with our small firm as the firm owner, Marie Marston, will be closely involved. As a small company, we are accustomed to regular review of our project schedules and prioritization of the project deliverables to ensure timely delivery is achieved. We understand that working beyond normal work hours to achieve our deliverable can sometimes be a necessary component in maintaining our reputation for providing superior service on projects. “Civil Works Engineers is dedicated to providing the highest quality in delivering civil engineering services to our clients by maintaining a peak standard of excellence within our firm through positive and committed employees.” 3.2.3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work STATEMENT OF PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The City of Hermosa Beach’s “On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements” is seeking to achieve the following three goals with the consultant’s assistance: • Leverage the vision and goals of the recently adopted General Plan and the Community Decision-Making Tool. • Utilize a comprehensive approach to maintain, rehabilitate, and improve the City’s infrastructure. • Provide the City a range of street improvements services to meet the City’s capital improvement needs on an as-needed basis. Keeping the above goals in mind, per the RFQ we understand the following tasks could be a part of the projects to be accomplished. Our Project Team is ready to take on tasks and achieve the goals with City. We have noted the team member which would be responsible for the delivery of each task. We can provide all of the identified designated services as listed in the RFQ. • Utility Research and Coordination (CWE) • Permit and Agency Approvals (CWE) • Environmental Assessment and Documentation (ICF) • Design Survey and Base Mapping Preparation (Saddleback Surveys) • Plans, Specifications and Estimate (CWE) • Drafting Software and City CADD Standard Requirements (CWE) • Licensed Profession Engineer Certification on PS&E (CWE) • Bidding and Construction Support (CWE, Leighton) • As-Built Plan Preparation (CWE) • Project Management during Design Phase (Project Team) • Attend Meetings Required by City (Project Team) ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 6 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com • Plan Check, Design Disciplines, and Permit Coordination (CWE) • Plans and Specification’s Addenda Review and Approval (CWE) • Providing Site Resurfacing Improvements and Geotechnical Investigation Services (CWE & Leighton) The types of tasks listed above could involve several professional disciplines including: Civil Engineering Streets, wet utilities modification, dry utilities coordination, drainage, grading, alignments, retaining walls, NPDES, staging, cost estimates, specifications, coordination with approving agencies, construction assistance Surveying and Mapping Design Surveys, mapping, right-of-way engineering, legal descriptions, Boundary Determination Geotechnical Engineering Geotechnical analysis, pavement recommendations, infiltration testing, Laboratory testing, report preparation Environmental Documentation Technical studies and environmental documentation as required by CEQA and NEPA, planning, assessment and analysis, Permits ORGANIZATIONAL CHART The chart below shows our Project Team and roles to support our Project Manager Ricky Chan. He will have the oversight responsibilities for all team members. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 7 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com APPROACH TO WORK PROGRAM (REQUIRED AND OPTIONAL TASKS) The Work Plan tasks have been identified as follows: 1. Utility Research and Coordination 2. Permit and Agency Approval 3. Environmental Assessment and Documentation 4. Design Survey and Base Mapping Preparation 5. Plans, Specifications and Estimate 6. Drafting Software and City CADD Standard Requirements 7. Licensed Profession Engineer Certification on PS&E 8. Bidding and Construction Support 9. As-Built Plan Preparation 10. Project Management during Design Phase 11. Attending Meetings Required by City 12. Plan Check, Design Topic, and Permit Coordination 13. Plans and Specification’s Addenda Review and Approval 14. Providing Site Resurfacing Improvements and Geotechnical Investigation Services The above tasks are descried in greater detail below: Task 1 – Utility Research and Coordination We will obtain the City’s list of utility contacts and augment that with our findings from Dig Alert. We will send out three utility notices (preliminary (60%), intermediate (90%), and final (100%) notices) to the involved utility owners. It will be necessary to contact all underground and overhead utility companies with facilities within the project limits to inform them of this project and obtain copies or atlas maps to verify locations, types, and sizes of facilities. Vertical information is likely unavailable on the utility company maps and therefore, it would not be shown on our plans/base map. At a minimum, horizontal information collected will be added to the base maps once we receive the records from the utility companies and the City. Once shown on the base maps, we will forward these to the utility companies for verification, compare the facilities with the project, and identify the potential conflicts. This task includes continued follow-up with the affected underground and overhead utility companies. The subsequent contacts with the utility owners (at 60%, 90% and 100% completion levels) will be to confirm their facilities are correctly shown on our base map and 60% plans, to present the 90% plans to them to verify their involvement, and finally at 100% to confirm the involvement locations and potential conflicts with the project. Task 2 – Permit and Agency Approval We will prepare all documentation required to obtain permits from all agencies having jurisdiction of the project. We will work with the City closely in securing approval of the final design. We will coordinate with the City on permits needed for NPDES compliance with the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, Coastal Commission, Caltrans, and other entities as appropriate. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 8 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com Task 3 – Environmental Assessment and Documentation For this on-call contract, we understand that the services to be provided could comprise preparing technical studies for a wide range of disciplines and CEQA and NEPA documents for a variety of projects undertaken by the City. These projects can range from very short turn-around tasks to longer-term project documentation, such as preparing full environmental documents and technical studies for projects involving Caltrans. We have the ability and proven track record to successfully deliver any or all of these services. ICF’s staff are thoroughly familiar with reporting requirements pursuant to CEQA and NEPA for roadway and highway improvement projects, including approvals from Caltrans District 7. We understand that projects could involve Caltrans as the NEPA lead agency or could be CEQA-only projects that solely involve the City. CEQA and NEPA Documentation There are several different NEPA and CEQA documents, and combinations thereof, that could be required as part of our on-call services for the City. Based on our experience providing on-call environmental consulting services for agencies such as Caltrans District 7 and the LA Metro, we know that your projects will fall into three primary categories—those that require only a CEQA document (i.e., projects with no federal nexus), those that have a federal nexus and require a joint NEPA/CEQA document (as a result of federal funding or for projects on the State Highway System), or those that require only a NEPA document and are statutorily exempt from CEQA (such as railroad/road grade separations). The CEQA documents could include Categorical Exemptions, Initial Studies leading to a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report, depending on the level of impacts or controversy identified. For joint NEPA/CEQA documents, we assume Caltrans would be the lead agency under NEPA and that either the City or Caltrans would be the lead agency under CEQA, depending on the type of facility involved. Since the majority of the projects requiring a joint document are assumed to fall under the Caltrans Local Assistance process, in which the City would be the CEQA lead agency. Caltrans would be the CEQA lead agency for projects involving state or federal transportation facilities. Joint documents can occur in almost any combination, ranging from Categorical Exemption/Categorical Exclusions (CE/CEs) to EIR/EISs, and any combination of NEPA and/or CEQA document in between. For any tasks to be initiated under this on-call contract, the ICF team will prepare a detailed scope and cost for review and approval by the City. We have the necessary knowledge and experience to prepare any level of NEPA/CEQA documentation. Our focus for any task order will be to use the simplest CEQA and/or NEPA document that is appropriate for the project, with concurrence from the City. Regulatory Agency Permitting The Civil Works team will review available project information and initiate contact with the regulatory agencies, including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). We will conduct this review as soon as possible so that the permit requirements are determined before the CEQA document is completed. Doing so will ensure that the permitting requirements are accurately documented, the permit applications are ready for submittal, and the requirements, including proposed mitigation, are worked out in advance. We assume that most projects will qualify for a USACE Section 404 nationwide permit (NWP) through collaboration with the engineering team to avoid and minimize impacts. We will submit the appropriate notification form and documentation. If an individual Section 404 permit is required, we will work with the City to try to modify the project to reduce the impacts so that a Section 404 NWP is appropriate. When necessary, we will prepare and submit the following in addition to ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 9 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com the Section 404 permit application—a written request for Section 401 Water Quality Certification to the RWQCB and a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Notification to CDFW. We will st rategize with the City to determine which jurisdictional determination is most appropriate for the project (approved or preliminary) and will prepare the appropriate documentation. Task 4 – Design Survey and Base Map Preparation Design survey will be performed to obtain precise elevation and location of existing facilities within and adjacent to the public right-of-way which may be impacted by the project. This can typically be completed by preparing a combination of an aerial base map and/or design ground topographic survey. Existing survey monuments will also be located within the project area to ensure they are not destroyed during construction activities. All surveying services will be completed in conformance with professional standards outlined by the City. The base map preparation will be prepared in AutoCAD format. The horizontal datum shall be NAD 83 and the vertical datum shall be NAVD 88. Pre- and post-construction Corner Records will be prepared in accordance with Section 8771 of the California Business and Professions Code to support capital improvement projects, where existing survey monumentation is at risk of destruction. Monuments will be tied to points outside of the construction footprint to memorialize the location, and where lost to construction activities, new monuments will be reestablished in the original location. Task 5 – Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Plans The final design leading to the development of construction documents would be based on the preliminary design and comments received from the team and City on the preliminary design submittal. Plans will be prepared using the City’s standards as appropriate. Street plans could consist of plan, profile, typical sections, and details – construction and intersection. The plans will show existing and proposed curb, gutter, sidewalk, medians, and driveways. They will also show existing private property features and right-of-way lines. Pavement removal limits and reconstruction would be delineated as well as the need for rehabilitation procedures. New outside and median curbs would be profiled. Potential types of sheets could consist of the following: 1. Title Sheet 2. Typical Cross Sections 3. Plan & Profile 4. Intersection Detail Sheet 5. Construction Details 6. Drainage Profiles and Details 7. Utility Modification Plans 8. Traffic Signal Modification Plan 9. Construction Staging 10. Electrical – Lighting (2 panels) 11. Signing & Striping (2 panels) Additionally, the plan and profile sheets will include drainage modifications as warranted. The drainage sheet will include drainage profiles and details as necessary. Drainage analysis prior to the development of plans will be based on the Los Angeles County Hydrology Manual. The utilities would be shown on the plans unless separate and detailed relocation plans and profiles are needed to portray the design intent. Intersection detail sheets may be required to denote grades through the intersections or other drainage control, reconstruction improvements, etc. A construction detail sheet is ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 10 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com included to address any specific walls, monument signs, driveways, and other facilities as may be encountered in the design. Also noted on the plans will be existing survey monumentation that may be obliterated during construction. Direction will be given on both the plans and specifications for the contractor to protect and/or restore all monumentation impacted during construction. Traffic engineering plans may consist of pavement delineation, signing, lighting, traffic signal modification, and traffic handling/traffic control plans. We will prepare the traffic design plans coordinating with the City for pertinent design standards. We will prepare a traffic signal installation and/or modification plan including all utilities/base map information, right of way, proposed signing/striping and roadway features including all pertinent information regarding the traffic signal improvements such as general notes, construction notes, legends, details, pole schedule, conductor schedule, phase diagram, proposed and existing equipment. Plans will be in accordance with the City of Hermosa Beach’s requirements and the latest editions of the American Public Works Association (APWA) Standard Plans and Specifications, Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications, and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Plans shall fit 24” x 36” City of Hermosa Beach standard “Title Block” sheet. It is anticipated that curb and gutter of the medians will be reconstructed; therefore, curb and gutter profiles will be prepared and provided on the street improvement plan sheets. All drawings will be created in AutoCAD and an electronic copy of all drawings will be submitted to the City. Specifications Technical specifications will be prepared in a format acceptable to the City and compatible with the overall project specifications format, which we anticipate would be the “Greenbook” format. We will prepare the “technical” specifications and the bid schedule. The City will attach their contract requirements and any other special or general provisions. The various items of work and their specific payment clauses including payment method will also accompany the technical specifications. Estimate A construction quantity and cost estimate will be prepared. The estimate will show quantities and unit prices for each item along with appropriate mobilization and contingency costs. Our unit prices will be based on a combination of prices obtained from recent construction bids for similar projects, discussions with City staff, and discussions with others in the construction industry. The items listed in the cost estimate will be the basis for the preparation of the bid list. We will work with the City to ensure the bid schedule is in accordance with City preference for the item list, method of measurement, etc. Task 6 – Drafting Software and City CADD Standard Requirements All preliminary and bid sets of plans shall be plotted on bond using AutoCAD. All drawing shall be completed per the City of Hermosa Beach CADD standards. Task 7 – Licensed Profession Engineer Certification on PS&E All original plan sheets, the title sheet of the specifications, calculations, and reports will be signed and stamped by the Consultant’s licensed (current through the remainder of the contract) professional engineer responsible/in charge of the project. These signed originals will then become the property of the City. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 11 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com Task 8 – Bidding and Construction Support We will attend the pre-bid meeting and provide responses to contractors’ questions during the bidding process regarding technical provisions, design drawings, or conflicts in the design. We will assist the City, in preparation of Addenda regarding omissions or conflicts in the design. Upon direction from the City, we would provide engineering assistance during construction. Potential services during this phase could include assistance with pre-construction meeting, responses to requests for information (RFIs), review of SWPPP, shop drawing review/approval, coordination with utility companies, field meetings / inspections, and final punch list Task 9 – As-Built Plan Preparation As-built plans are revised drawings created and submitted by a contractor after a construction project is finished. They contain any changes made from the initial drawings during the construction process and provide an exact rendering of the project as it appears upon completion. We will prepare as-built plans upon receipt of the contractor markups. Final as-built plans will be submitted in AutoCAD and PDF format. Task 10 – Project Management during Design Phase Good project management is critical to any project’s success. From project inception through completion, clients need to rest assured their consultants’ project manager and support staff will anticipate problems before they occur and respond to issues as they arise during the course of the project in a timely manner. Project Management includes the following tasks: Preparing and monitoring the project schedule Cost Control - Monitoring design and construction costs Document Management Communication plan Quality control and quality assurance The remainder of this section will discuss the topics above that are not presented in a later portion of this approach. Project Schedule We will develop a project schedule for design and construction. The schedule or updated schedule will be distributed during the kick- off and PDT meetings. The project schedule will be divided into tasks and subtasks in full detail including City function timeline, critical path, and other outside sources such as agency approvals or utilities. The schedule will include anticipated durations for all tasks and will show the critical path tasks. Schedule control is a priority for the City and the project team. We implement the following tools to monitor the schedule: • Ensure sufficient qualified staff are available to complete our projects and therefore, we assess our workload before committing our assigned staff to projects. • Maintaining regular communication with the project development team and City. • Meetings at key decision points, conference calls and emails between the key personnel will keep the project moving forward to ensure the project is meeting objectives and direction. • Updates to the schedule based on design input and direction from the City. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 12 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com •Our goal is for the City to be an integral part of the design process. We expect the City will assist with project development by providing timely direction (as required), coordination with other City Departments (as required) and willingness to participate in design strategies and value engineering alternatives. •We involve the utility companies at an early stage to ensure facilities are shown correctly, any impacts are resolved early in the design process and facilities are protected correctly. Cost Control Regarding cost control, there are two types of costs that need to be controlled: those related to the design cost/budget, and those related to the construction cost/budget. Design Costs Once we have prepared our estimated design budget based on the project tasks and scopes and the fee is approved by the City, it is up to us to monitor our internal and sub consulting costs. We can monitor these costs on a weekly basis and make staffing changes as necessary to adjust the resources being utilized versus the effort required. On a monthly basis, the project manager will compare the percent completed to the percent expended. Designing to the Construction Budget To ensure the City budget is maintained and that construction can be done within the City’s budget, it is important throughout the project development to keep an eye on the project cost. The overall project cost will be developed using a template cost estimating form, including the latest available unit price information. We base our cost estimating upon our knowledge of the construction industry, which includes keeping abreast of current bid prices, reviewing cost data books, monitoring construction techniques, conversations with cities, counties, relationships with contractors, and other recognized cost estimating publications to utilize the latest unit cost data available. Document Management We will manage project documents such that information is properly retained and shared among the necessary parties. We can utilize our company share site or we can keep all files in our own server-based network. We can structure either our network or share system as the City may request. We can also maintain a document log indicating key points in each documents’ life cycle such as dates of preparation, submittals, reviews/comments, resubmittals, etc. When changes occur, the document’s revision history log will reflect an updated version number as well as the date, the owner making the change, and change description will be recorded in the revision history log of the document. Task 11 – Attending Meetings Required by City Coordination and communication among the design team and the agencies is vital. This is generally maintained through a series of regular meetings and the day-to-day coordination contact with the Project Development Team. Our project manager will be the primary point of contact. Team coordination and regular meetings facilitate the required communication and keep a project moving on schedule. At the project onset, we will hold a kickoff meeting followed by regular Project Development Team (PDT) meetings. The PDT will consist of the consultant team and City representatives. The purpose of the meetings would be to discuss progress, project issues, exchange ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.3 - 13 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com information, resolve issues, receive guidance and direction, review the project schedule, and facilitate coordination. We will prepare agendas and meeting minutes. To facilitate communication, we will develop a “list” of project stakeholders. A project contact list of the PDT members will be developed and distributed. The following entities may play a role in the City’s projects: County of Los Angeles, adjacent cities, utility owners, and Caltrans District 7. Task 12 – Plan Check, Design Topic, and Permit Coordination We will coordinate plan check, design topics, permits and any other issues with the City, ither agencies, and all utility companies as required. We will be the liaison with involved agencies. Task 13 – Plans and Specification’s Addenda Review and Approval We will assist the City in preparing Addenda regarding omissions or conflicts in the design during bidding process. Task 14 – Providing Site Resurfacing Improvements and Geotechnical Investigation Services We will provide site resurfacing improvements including grading, grind, asphalt and reinforced concrete paving and geotechnical investigations as needed for the design. For the geotechnical analysis and pavement thickness calculations, subgrade soil samples taken in the field will be identified, labeled and measured during the sampling process. Data developed during the laboratory testing will be utilized to project probable field support conditions during construction and highlight where appropriate special care may be required during roadway preparation. Evaluation of the present pavement thicknesses utilizing component analysis with R-value data will be combined with future traffic estimates (Traffic Index provided by Client) for design and development of suitable, alterative replacement sections. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Our project team can also provide traffic plan preparation services. The traffic plans include signing and striping, traffic signal, signal communication, traffic control, and stage construction. Additionally, if needed we can augment our team with a landscape architect if landscape design and irrigation design are needed. We can provide QSD services to the City and assist in the development of SUSMPs and SWPPPs. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR CITY STAFF Our project team can provide all the services listed in the RFQ’s Scope of Work. We anticipate the City will provide design direction, review of work products, and record documents. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.4 - 1 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com 3.2.4 Project Management Plan COMMUNICATIONS APPROACH Coordination and communication among the design team and the City is vital. This is generally maintained through a series of regular meetings and the day-to-day coordination contact through emails and conference calls with the Project Development Team. This is important to keep the project moving forward and resolve critical issues in a timely manner. Our project manager, Ricky Chan, will be the primary point of contact. To facilitate communication, we will develop a “list” of project stakeholders. A project contact list of the PDT members will be developed and distributed. Our goal is for the City to be an integral part of the design process. We expect the City will assist with project development by providing timely direction (as required), coordination with other City Departments (as required) and willingness to participate in design strategies and value engineering alternatives. CWE involves the utility companies at an early stage to ensure facilities are shown correctly, any impacts are resolved early in the design process and facilities are protected correctly. Our team has experience in working iteratively with the community to incorporate their concerns and achieve a design that meets their needs and the agency’s goals. QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL APPROACH To ensure that all deliverables will be free of errors our Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program is a large part of providing detailed and coordinated design documents. Our QA/QC plan will include checking the documents – initial and final design – to meet the City’s requirements in advance of submittals. Our principal- in-charge firmly believes in performing quality reviews prior to document submittal. We will perform a comprehensive in-house review prior to submittal of documents and will compare the documents to the appropriate requirements/manuals. Our review covers the plans, specifications and reports for proper coordination, accuracy and submittal standards prior to submittal. We perform an interdisciplinary plan check to ensure that cross disciplines are coordinated. At final submittal, an additional cross-check is performed between the items and quantities in the bid list and that shown on the plans. The key to our QA/QC procedure is that it is implemented throughout the life of a project, not simply before a final submittal. Civil Works Engineers will accept responsibility for the integrity and accuracy and completeness of all documents prepared. Our QC plan will include checking the documents for agency requirements. The QC plan will include methods to review initial documents including concept plans, calculations, cost estimates, and reports. The review will compare the documents to the appropriate format per City guidelines. Before submittal, the project manager will approve (QA) the documents and ensure the QC has been performed. The produced documents will be of a quality acceptable for approval by the City. The QC Program will be in effect throughout the entire contract to ensure the documents conform to engineering industry standards. Our quality control plan includes measures to independently check and back-check documents, distributes correspondence to those involved on the particular projects and then places them in an archive file. All comments we receive from the agencies review of the draft documents will be addressed and incorporated into the final documents as appropriate. The submitted documents will be checked and initialed by the original designer and the checker. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.4 - 2 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com Our review includes: •Inter-Disciplinary Review – Managers of each applicable discipline will review the plans, design and/or reports. •Coordination Review – The project manager, discipline managers and subconsultants review the plans, specifications and reports for proper coordination, accuracy, and submittal standards. •Submittal Review – An independent review of the plans, specifications and reports will be completed by the QA/QC manager prior to submittal to Metro. Our QA/QC program also includes preparation of written responses to comments, design issues and questions. Written responses will help acknowledge all stakeholders concerns and questions, verify all concerns and questions are addressed and reduce multiple reviews of the same issue. The QA/QC program shall in effect throughout the contract duration. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 1 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com 3.2.5 Experience and Qualifications The table below indicates the accuracy of our cost estimates on four recent projects comparing the engineer’s estimate to the contractor’s bids. Project CWE Estimate Lowest Bid Highest Bid San Gabriel Streets Phase 1 $1.69 million $ 1.45 million $ 1.92 million San Gabriel Streets Phase 2 $2.34 million $ 1.44 million $3.50 million MacArthur Blvd & University Drive $2.72 million $ 2.32 million $3.03 million Dover Drive & Westcliff Drive $3.53 million $3.29 million $3.90 million SUMMARY OF RELEVANT PROJECTS As requested in the RFQ, the following representative projects demonstrate our qualifications for the potential of providing services to the City of Hermosa Beach. References are given for the project examples. MacArthur Boulevard & University Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Owner: City of Newport Beach Dates: 2018 - 2019 Value: $2.9 million Key Personnel: Ricky Chan, Marie Marston, Mariana Selim Type of Project: On-Call, Civil Design, Specs, Bid Documents, Estimate, WQMP, Project Management The City desired to improve the wearing surface of MacArthur Boulevard and University Drive and identified the project through their Pavement Management Program indications. The rehabilitation is to extend on MacArthur Boulevard from Ford Road / Bonita Canyon Drive to the SR-73 (4,050’) and on University Drive from Jamboree Road to the east side of the SR-73 northbound ramps (2,450’) MacArthur Boulevard is a heavily traveled 8-lane street in this section and University Drive is a 4-lane street leading to UCI. The City also desired to reconstruct deteriorated concrete flatwork, upgrade pedestrian facilities to ADA and restripe using the new 6” stripes with a slightly changed cross section. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 2 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com South Highland Avenue at Mango Avenue Traffic Signal Project Owner: City of Fontana Dates: 2020 - 2021 Value: $350,000 Key Personnel: Ricky Chan, Marie Marston Type of Project: On-Call - Widening Design, New Traffic Signal This intersection was unsignalized and the T-intersection meets South Highland Avenue within a horizontal curve. The project proposes to signalize this intersection while constructing minor improvements including the construction of curb access return ramps to ultimate locations determined by the Circulation Master Plan, curb and gutter, and an asphalt concrete transition to the existing asphalt concrete pavement. Several proposed street realignment alternatives were studied to add a westbound left turn lane and avoid intrusion into Caltrans right of way. The City also intends to install fiber optic interconnect cable and conduit along South Highland Avenue from Highland Village Center to Mango Avenue to eliminate a gap in the existing infrastructure. Services included field investigation, utility research, sight distance analysis, street realignment study, street improvements, signing and striping, traffic signal, coordination with SCE, signal communication, street lighting, shop drawing review, and construction support. Great Streets 2017 – 2018 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements Design Project Owner: City of San Gabriel Dates: 2017 - 2019 Value: $3.2 million Key Personnel: Marie Marston Type of Project: On-Call, Civil Design for Pavement Rehabilitation, ADA Compliance The City of San Gabriel has an annual Great Street Program intended to reconstruct and maintain the City’s pavement as identified through field investigation and their Pavement Management Program. In this project, the City identified two phases with 9 streets in each phase requiring complete reconstruction. Civil Works provided design services for the pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction of these 18 streets (3.6 miles) within the City. The 18 streets are located primarily in residential and commercial areas of the City. Since most of 18 streets have not been rehabilitated for more than 20 years, the existing roadway asphalt exhibits signs of various asphalt distress including block, transverse, longitudinal, map, and alligator cracking. The project included field review, surveying, geotechnical investigations, pavement analysis, geotechnical report, pre-design report, ADA ramp reconstruction, sidewalk reconstruction, striping, final design including plans, specifications, and estimates, bidding document ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 3 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com preparation, and bidding and construction support. The analysis included review of full depth reconstruction with cement stabilized or recycled asphalt concrete layers with an option for cold central plant recycling (CCPR). The City selected AC over cement stabilized pulverized base (CSPB). Phase 1 was estimated at $1.69 million and the range of bidders in July 2018 was from $1.45 to $1.92 million. Phase 2 is currently at 90% design level with an estimate of $1.21 million. Dover Drive Improvements Owner: City of Newport Beach Dates: 2015 - 2017 Value: $3.5 million Key Personnel: Marie Marston Type of Project: On-Call, Roadway Final Design Improvements – Pavement Rehabilitation, Signal Upgrades, Median Modifications, Landscape A major Orange County Sanitation District aged trunk line sewer was replaced within Dover Drive which caused significant damage to the street surface. As a result, the City initiated a street improvement project with along Dover Drive and Westcliff Drive to improve the pavement, signals, and aesthetics. The project involved the rehabilitation of the two existing roadways and construction of new and in some locations, widened landscaped medians. The improvements on Dover Drive extend between Coast Highway and Irvine Avenue, approximately 1.4 miles and on Westcliff Drive from Dover Drive to Irvine Avenue. A change in aesthetics was also requested by the City and therefore, our team developed alternative landscape palettes from which the City could choose the preferred new look. The project additionally included curb ramp improvements, traffic signal upgrades, traffic handling storm drain catch basin upgrades, and new irrigation and landscaping. Coordination and an encroachment permit were necessary from Caltrans for the work on Dover Drive at the intersection with Pacific Coast Highway. We coordinated with the existing utility companies including AT&T, City of Newport Beach water, The Gas Company, Southern California Edison, Orange County Sanitation District, and Time Warner. Orange County Bikeway Loop Segment D Owner: County of Orange Dates: 2019 - 2020 Value: $9.5 million Key Personnel: Marie Marston, Ricky Chan, Francois Zugmeyer, Tammy Allee Type of Project: Traffic Signal, Signal Communication, Lighting Design, WQMP, Specifications, Cost Estimate, Shop Drawing Review, and Construction Support The project proposes to close the bikeway gap between the El Cajon Regional Riding and Hiking Trail (City of Yorba ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 4 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com Linda) and the La Floresta Trail (City of Brea) by constructing a 16-foot wide Class 1 bikeway along the west side of Carbon Canyon Channel from Bastanchury Road to Imperial Highway (City of Placentia) and along the south side of Imperial Highway from Carbon Canyon Channel to La Floresta Drive. The total length of this segment is 3,550 feet and includes ramps to Golden Avenue. The project also included traffic signal modifications with additional vehicle signal indication and bike/pedestrian push button assemblies to the Imperial Highway/La Floresta Drive intersection, new trail lighting from La Floresta Drive to Carbon Canyon Channel, new traffic signal for mid-block bike and pedestrian crossing at Golden Avenue, and tunnel lighting at the undercrossing at Bastanchury Road. Project included the preparation of the Water Quality Management Plan and design for the inclusion of six biofiltration swales along the trail. Services included field investigation, traffic signal, coordination with SCE, signal communication, lighting design, water quality management plan, specifications, cost estimate, shop drawing review, and construction support. Raymond Avenue at Pico Street Intersection Traffic Signal Project Owner: City of Pasadena Dates: 2020 - 2021 Value: $400,000 Key Personnel: Marie Marston, Ricky Chan Type of Project: Traffic Signal Modification, Signing and Striping, Traffic control, Pedestrian Detour, Street Realignment A new medical office building is proposed to be built at the southeast corner of the Raymond Avenue/Pico Street intersection in the City of Pasadena. The project will remove the existing curb return at the southeast corner and reconstruct a new curb return north of the existing curb return location and as a result, two existing traffic signal poles at the southeast corner will need to be relocated at the new curb return location. The City also intends to replace the existing safety lighting luminaries with LED and existing detection cameras the latest detection cameras. Service included field review, traffic signal modifications, signing and striping plans, traffic control, pedestrian detour, temporary traffic signal, temporary signing and striping, signal communication, shop drawing review, and construction support. Bastanchury Road and Rose Drive Storm Drain Improvements Owner: City of Yorba Linda Dates: 2016 - 2020 Value: $449,000 Key Personnel: Marie Marston, Francois Zugmeyer Type of Project: On-Call, Preliminary and Final Engineering, Utilities, Drainage and Hydrology Report The project involves providing civil design services for the design of a new storm drain system in Bastanchury Road. The City is proposing to install new catch basins at the northeast corner of the intersection and a new storm drainpipe flowing westerly in ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 5 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com Bastanchury Road to the existing Orange County Flood Control District Channel. There is an existing 24” RCP connection to the OCFCD channel on the south side of Bastanchury Road. This connection collects runoff from a curb inlet on Bastanchury Road at the channel crossing and from the residential development on Compass Circle. The option to connect the new storm drainpipe to the existing 24” RCP pipe and avoid a new connection to the channel was investigated and rejected due to the magnitude of the additional runoff. An alternative solution was proposed by the City. This concept would propose a storm drain from the Bastanchury Road/Rose Drive intersection along Rose Drive to be connected to the existing 39-inch El Cajon Avenue storm drain. The hydrology study prepared for the Bastanchury Road concept was extended to include the drainage area, east of Rose Drive and south of Bastanchury Road, draining to the El Cajon Avenue storm drain in order to verify to feasibility of adding the additional runoff to the existing storm drain. City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Owner: City of Yorba Linda Dates: 2012 - 2013 Value: $600,000 (2010), $1m (2011) Key Personnel: Marie Marston, Francois Zugmeyer Type of Project: On-Call, Pavement Rehabilitation, ADA Compliance As part of an on-call services contract, Civil Works Engineers prepared three sets of construction documents over three different fiscal years for the pavement rehabilitation of multiple residential streets throughout the City. In 2009 the rehabilitation included six streets, in 2010, seven streets, and in 2011, 26 streets were included within the project. Plans included patch repair of damaged and failed pavement areas, repair of damaged parkway improvements, grinding and pavement overlay. Portola Parkway Improvements at SR-241 Owner: City of Lake Forest Dates: 2014 - 2016 Value: $690,000 Key Personnel: Marie Marston Type of Project: Roadway Final Design Improvements – Widening, Restriping, Signal Upgrades, Median Modifications, Landscape The City of Lake Forest hired Civil Works Engineers to prepare the preliminary and final design for street widening, restriping, and streetscape. The widening and restriping was approximately 1000 feet on the westbound side from Glenn Ranch Road to SR-241 on- ramp. The aesthetic enhancements were approximately 2900 feet from SR-241 to El Toro Road and consisted of landscaping and hardscape within the existing raised center medians. The street widening was for approximately 430 feet on the westbound side from the SR-241 southbound off-ramp to Rancho Parkway. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 6 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com The re-striping of westbound Portola Parkway eliminates the trap lane to the northbound SR-241 on-ramp and provides three through lanes with the rightmost lane having the option to enter the toll road. The traffic signal was modified to add a head to the undercrossing soffit in line with the new third westbound travel lane. The added through lane provided a safety improvement for drivers to continue west on Portola Parkway or to enter onto the on-ramp to northbound SR-241. Imperial Highway (SR-90) ADA Curb Ramps and Driveways Upgrade Owner: Caltrans District 12 Dates: 2016 - 2017 Value: $3.8 million Key Personnel: Marie Marston, Francois Zugmeyer Type of Project: On-Call, Civil Design, ADA compliance Prepared Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) to update pedestrian facilities along Imperial Highway to meet current American Disability Act (ADA) standards and Caltrans conservative standards. The PS&E included the modification of curb ramps and driveways, operational and ADA requirements, and refreshment of pavement delineation. The overall project included 23,425 feet of roadway from SR-57 to Gemini Avenue. CWE’s portion included 1,375 feet from Sycamore Avenue to Pine Avenue which included 6 intersections, the redesign of 11 access ramps, and the redesign of 7 driveways. Pacific Coast Highway (SR-1) and Huntington Street Intersection Improvements Owner: Caltrans District 12 Dates: 2016 – 2018 Value: $692,000 Key Personnel: Ricky Chan, Marie Marston, Francois Zugmeyer Type of Project: On-Call, Civil Design, ADA compliance, Pedestrian Detours Caltrans initiated this safety project to modify the existing traffic signal to use high visibility LEDs, modify safety lighting, refresh pavement delineation, and upgrade the pedestrian facilities to comply with current ADA. We prepared a Project Report and final design (PS&E), Traffic Management Plan, pedestrian staging/detour plan, short- form Storm Water Data Report, plans, fact sheets, PD-26 for right of way requirements and right of way exhibits. We coordinated with Caltrans for their preparation of the environmental document, associated technical studies, and signal design. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 7 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com Pacific Coast Highway (SR-1) Roadway Preservation Project in Two Locations (Laguna Beach and Newport Beach) Owner: Caltrans District 12 Dates: 2018 - 2021 Value: $6.5 million Key Personnel: Ricky Chan, Marie Marston Type of Project: On-Call, Striping, Signing, Pedestrian Staging, Utilities As part of an on-call contract, this task order was to rehabilitate the existing pavement, remove and reconstruct new guard rail and upgrade and construct new curb ramps (at SR-1/Vista Del Sol and SR-1/Reef Point Drive intersections) as stated in the Capital Preventive Maintenance Project Report (CAPM PR). The work also included roadway widening of approximately 600 feet on northbound Pacific Coast Highway in advance of the Newport Coast Drive intersection for a bike lane. As the Assistant Civil Engineer, Mr. Pham prepared utility conflict maps, pavement delineation plans, sign plans, stage construction and traffic handling plans, and quantities and estimates. Fairview Street Design and Bridge Replacement Owner: City of Santa Ana Dates: 2017 - 2019 Value: $6 million Key Personnel: Marie Marston, Francois Zugmeyer Type of Project: Geometrics, Utility, River hydraulic analysis, Drainage study, floodplain review The City of Santa Ana requested the preparation of environmental documents, design of street widening, bridge replacement, and environmental documents and regulatory permits for Fairview Street Bridge crossing over Santa Ana River. This contract will also include providing limited field observation and construction support. The City is proposing to widen Fairview Street between 9th Street and 16th Street from a four-lane roadway to a 6-lane arterial to provide adequate vehicular capacity within the City’s northern limits. A segment of the project limit includes a bridge replacement. Fairview Bridge is striped with two lanes in each direction with no curb or sidewalk. Bridge replacement is necessary to accommodate 3 lanes in each direction and to provide a complete bridge deck with barrier rail, sidewalk, raised median, and lighting for a total bridge width of 100’ wide. Responsibilities included Water Quality Requirements, Hydrology/Hydraulic Analyses and River Modeling, Street Design, Traffic Signage and Striping, Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E), and Bid and Construction Support. Southbound I-605 Beverly Blvd Interchange, Pico Rivera, CA Client: Los Angeles Metro Dates: 2017 - 2023 Value: $18 million Key Personnel: Marie Marston, Ricky Chan, Francois Zugmeyer, Tammy Allee, Lander Pham, Mariana Selim Type of Project: Project Report, PS&E, Interchange Reconfiguration This project involved the preparation of a Project Report and PS&E for an interchange reconfiguration in Pico Rivera, CA. The existing configuration consists of a collector-distributor road with a loop off-ramp and loop on- ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 8 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com ramp and a direct on-ramp. The short weaving distance between the two loop ramps was identified as a congestion hot spot having a higher accident rate than average. The project examines two build alternatives, a diamond configuration and a modified diamond with a loop on-ramp and removes the collector-distributor road. The project involves preparation of a project report, geometrics, fact sheets, drainage study, storm water data report, traffic study, TMP, construction staging, temporary signals, coordination with Caltrans ongoing fiber replacement project, coordination with Caltrans for the environmental documentation, modified access report, right of way, utilities, life cycle cost analysis, landscape, geotechnical investigation, surveys, and cost estimates. The Project Report was finalized in March 2020 and are currently preparing the final construction plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E). The project is an early action project by Metro. IFC FEATURED PROJECT CEQA/NEPA Environmental Services and Support Contract Owner: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Dates: 2017 – 2022 Value: $25.6 million Key Personnel: Kim Avila, Namrata Cariapa Type of Project: On-Call, CEQA/NEPA environmental compliance CEQA/NEPA environmental compliance services to Metro under an on-call services contract. ICF has held this contract for 15 of the past 20 years. ICF has been issued 40+ task orders to date encompassing a range of environmental compliance services for Metro projects in planning, final design, or construction throughout the Metro system. ICF is able to call upon our deep pool of resource and technical specialists located in Southern California to respond to Metro’s immediate needs (e.g., on-site construction monitoring and preparation of environmental documents to meet federal funding deadlines), as well as our specialty experts in climate change and energy and water conservation located throughout the company to assist Metro in developing and implementing their sustainability policies and plans. Our services include archaeological and paleontological monitoring, noise studies, noise and vibration monitoring, traffic studies, air quality studies, renovation and rehabilitation of historic resources, preparation of CEQA/NEPA environmental documents, special studies to support Metro’s policies related to sustainability and renewable energy, public outreach, and environmental education programs. To date projects have included the Regional Connector, Patsouras Plaza Bus Station Project, Crenshaw Corridor cultural resources monitoring task orders. Other select task orders under this new contract include the Division 20 Portal Widening and Turnback Facility environmental documentation, the Metro Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit Improvements Project Statutory Exemption and Technical Studies, Zero Emission Bus Planning Study, Centinela Grade Separation Traffic Study, an SB 743 Analysis Study, Valuation of Triple Bottom Line Tools and Approaches, 2019 Climate Action and Adaptation Plan update, Resiliency Indicator Framework Update, Renewable Natural Gas Assessment, and EV Implementation Plan. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 9 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com LEIGHTON CONSULTING FEATURED PROJECT Brea Canyon Road Widening Owner: Orange County Public Works Dates: 2019 – Ongoing Value: $13 million Key Personnel: Djan Chandra Type of Project: Roadway Widening Leighton conducted a geotechnical engineering exploration for the University Drive Widening Improvements Project for the City of Irvine. The limits of this project were generally between Ridgeline Drive and the I-405 on- ramp (approximately 2,700 feet). Improvements within the project limits were proposed to consist of construction of new pavement for street widening, roadway signs, inlet and outlet structures, curb, gutter, sidewalk and an AC dike. The project involved the widening of eastbound University Drive from approximately 800 feet east of Ridgeline Drive to I-405 on-ramp. The widening will increase the width of the thoroughfare to accommodate three lanes on the eastbound direction throughout the project limits. The purpose of our geotechnical exploration was to evaluate the soil and groundwater conditions at the site through review of available data and exploratory borings; conduct laboratory testing on select samples to determine the relevant engineering properties of the soils and provide geotechnical recommendations for pavement design and rehabilitation. The scope of our work included a background review of relevant geotechnical and geological literature pertinent of the site to obtain necessary information, a site visit from a member of our technical staff to mark boring locations, a field exploration where six borings were advanced within the project limits and laboratory testing on selected soil samples. Recommendations for pavement rehabilitation included surface milling followed by the placement of a pavement reinforcing layer and a new asphalt concrete overlay. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 10 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com REFERENCES City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335 Estephany Monroy emonroy@fontana.org (909) 350-6642 Reference Project: Highland Avenue at Mango Avenue Traffic Signal Project Manager: Ricky Chan Services: Widening Design, New Traffic Signal City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 David Webb dawebb@city.newport-beach.ca.us (949) 644-3311 Reference Project: MacArthur Boulevard & University Drive Pavement Rehabilitation, Balboa Boulevard Streetscape, Dover Drive Project Manager: Marie Marston, Ricky Chan Services: On-Call, Civil Design, Specs, Bid Documents, Estimate, WQMP, Project Management City of Yorba Linda 4845 Casa Loma Avenue, Yorba Linda, CA 92885 Fredy Castillo fcastillo@yorba-linda.org (714) 961-7170 Reference Project: Bastanchury Road and Rose Drive Storm Drain Improvements Project Manager: Marie Marston Services: On-Call, Preliminary Engineering, Utilities, Drainage and Hydrology Reports ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 11 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com ASSIGNED STAFF RICKY CHAN, PE, TE, PTOE, Project Manager and Project Civil and Traffic Engineer RELEVANT PROJECTS: Raymond Avenue at Pico Street Intersection Traffic Signal Project, City of Pasadena. Project Manager. A new medical office building is proposed to be built at the southeast corner of the Raymond Avenue/Pico Street intersection. The project will remove the existing curb return at the southeast corner and reconstruct a new curb return north of the existing curb return location and as a result, two existing traffic signal poles will need to be relocated at the new curb return location. The City also intends to replace the existing safety lighting luminaries with LED and existing detection cameras the latest detection cameras. Service included field review, traffic signal modifications, signing and striping plans, traffic control, pedestrian detour, temporary traffic signal, temporary signing and striping, signal communication, shop drawing review, and construction support. Highland Avenue at Mango Avenue Traffic Signal Project, City of Fontana. Project Manager/Senior Traffic Design Engineer. This intersection was unsignalized and the T- intersection meets Highland Avenue within a horizontal curve. The project proposes to signalize this intersection, construction of curb access return ramps determined by the Circulation Master Plan, curb and gutter, and an asphalt concrete transition to the existing asphalt concrete pavement. The City also intends to install fiber optic interconnect cable and condui t along Highland Avenue from Highland Village Center to Mango Avenue to eliminate a gap in the existing infrastructure. Services included field investigation, utility research, sight distance analysis, street improvements, signing and striping, traffic signal, coordination with SCE, signal communication, street lighting, shop drawing review, and construction support. MacArthur Boulevard & University Drive Pavement Rehabilitation, City of Newport Beach. Project Manager / Project Engineer. The City desired to improve the wearing surface of MacArthur Boulevard and University Drive and identified the project through their Pavement Management Program indications. The rehabilitation is to extend on MacArthur Boulevard from Ford Road / Bonita Canyon Drive to the SR-73 (4,050’) and on University Drive from Jamboree Road to the east side of the SR-73 northbound ramps (2,450’). The City also desired to reconstruct deteriorated concrete flatwork, upgrade pedestrian facilities to ADA and restripe using the new 6” stripes with a slightly changed cross section. We prepared plans for pavement rehabilitation including 50’ cross sections and plan and profile. We also prepared traffic handling and detour plans for the construction work within Caltrans Right of Way. The traffic handling plans was designed for traffic going through the work area during % AVAILABILITY: 50% TENURE AT CWE: 5 yrs REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer (California), #71389 Traffic Engineer, #2673 Professional Traffic Operations Engineer, #3685 EDUCATION: B.S. in Civil Engineering University of California, Irvine, 2000 KEY STRENGTHS: •Demonstrated success on more than 200 traffic signal design projects •Well-rounded experience in many aspects of street design projects including raised median modifications, roadway geometrics, traffic signals, signing and striping, construction staging and traffic handling, and utility impacts •Has worked on a variety of bikeway, roadway, traffic -related projects inclusive of hyd rology/hydraulics, drainage design, traffic studies, and retaining walls ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 12 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com construction. The detour plans were designed to direct traffic going around and staying away from the work area. The detour routes included Jamboree Boulevard, Macarthur Boulevard and SR-73. Great Street Project 2017-18, San Gabriel. Project Manager for providing pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction design services for 18 streets (3.6 miles) within the City. The 18 streets are located primarily in residential and commercial areas of the city. Since most of 18 streets have not been rehabilitated for more than 20 years, the existing roadway asphalt exhibits signs of various asphalt distress including block, transverse, longitudinal, map, and alligator cracking. The project included pavement rehabilitation, field review, surveying, geotechnical investigations, pavement analysis, geotechnical report, pre-design report, ADA ramp reconstruction, sidewalk reconstruction, striping, final PS&E, bidding document preparation, and construction support. Orange County Bikeway Loop Segment D, County of Orange. Traffic Engineer. The project proposes to close the bikeway gap between the El Cajon Regional Riding and Hiking Trail (Yorba Linda) and the La Floresta Trail (Brea) by constructing a 16-foot wide Class 1 bikeway along the west side of Carbon Canyon Channel from Bastanchury Road to Imperial Highway (Placentia) and along the south side of Imperial Highway from Carbon Canyon Channel to La Floresta Drive. The total length of this segment is 3,550 feet and includes ramps to Golden Avenue. The project also included traffic signal modifications with additional vehicle signal indication and bike/pedestrian push button assemblies, new trail lighting from La Floresta Drive to Carbon Canyon Channel, new traffic signal for mid- block bike and ADA pedestrian crossing at Golden Avenue, and tunnel lighting at the undercrossing at Bastanchury Road. Project included the preparation of the WQMP and design for the inclusion of six biofiltration swales along the trail. Services included field investigation, traffic signal, coordination with SCE, signal communication, lighting design, water quality management plan, specifications, cost estimate, and construction support. Pacific Coast Highway (SR-1) Roadway Preservation Project in Two Locations, from Vista Del Sol to 7th Avenue in Laguna Beach, and from Crescent Bay Drive to Newport Coast Drive in Newport Beach, Caltrans District 12. Project Engineer. As part of an on-call contract, this project was to rehabilitate the existing pavement, remove and reconstruct new guard rail and upgrade and construct new curb ramps. The work also included roadway widening of approximately 600 feet on northbound Pacific Coast Highway in advance of the Newport Coast Drive intersection for a bike lane. Responsibilities included preparing final TMP, utility conflict maps, pavement delineation plans, sign plans, stage construction and traffic handling plans, SWDR, specifications, and quantities and estimates. For the curb ramp reconstructions, a pedestrian detour path with channelizers, temporary curb ramp, and temporary traffic signal push button assembly and post was designed to be outside and next to the existing curb return. Pacific Coast Highway (SR-1) and Huntington Street Intersection Improvements, Huntington Beach, Caltrans District 12. Project Engineer for providing final engineering design services for street improvements at the intersection of and Pacific Coast Highway (SR-1) and Huntington Street. The project was to upgrade the existing pedestrian facilities to the current American Disability Act (ADA) standards which included four existing curb ramps. The design services included the preparation of street improvement plans, detail plans, signing and striping plans, pedestrian detour plans, construction cost estimate, and specifications. State College Boulevard At-grade Crossing, Fullerton. Project Engineer for the development of PS&E’s for a fiber optic cable traffic signal communication connecting to the City’s existing twisted pair system, traffic signals at the intersection of Valencia and State College and Fender/Walnut at State College Boulevard (offset intersection), street lighting plan, and signing and striping in the association with lower State College Boulevard under the BNSF rail crossing. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 13 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com MARIE MARSTON, PE, Principal-In-Charge, QA/QC Manager RELEVANT PROJECTS: Dover Drive Rehabilitation & Streetscape Improvements, City of Newport Beach. Project Manager. Project involved rehabilitation of the existing roadway and construction of new landscaped center medians and widening of existing landscaped center medians on Dover Drive between Coast Highway and Irvine Avenue, approximately 1.4 miles. Median improvements included removal of existing median paving and installation of new irrigation and landscaping. Also included curb ramp improvements, traffic signal upgrades, traffic handling, catch basin upgrades, and irrigation and landscaping. Fairview Street Design and Bridge Replacement, City of Santa Ana. Project Manager. The City of Santa Ana requested the preparation of environmental documents, design of street widening, bridge replacement, and environmental documents and regulatory permits for Fairview Street Bridge crossing over Santa Ana River. The City is proposing to widen Fairview Street between 9th Street and 16th Street from a four-lane roadway to a 6-lane arterial to provide adequate vehicular capacity within the City’s northern limits. A segment of the project limit includes a bridge replacement. Fairview Bridge is striped with two lanes in each direction with no curb or sidewalk. Bridge replacement is necessary to accommodate 3 lanes in each direction and to provide a complete bridge deck with barrier rail, sidewalk, raised median, and lighting for a total bridge width of 100’ wide. Responsibilities included Water Quality Requirements, Hydrology/Hydraulic Analyses and River Modeling, Street Design, Traffic Signage and Striping, Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates, and Bid and Construction Support. Great Street Project 2017‐18, City of San Gabriel. Project Manager. Provided pavement rehabilitation reconstruction design services for 18 streets (3.6 miles) located primarily in residential and commercial areas. The project included determination of appropriate pavement rehabilitation, field review, surveying, geotechnical investigations, pavement analysis, geotechnical report, pre‐design report, ADA ramp reconstruction, sidewalk reconstruction, striping, specifications, estimates, bidding document preparation, and construction support. MacArthur Boulevard & University Drive Pavement Rehabilitation, City of Newport Beach. Principal in Charge / QA/QC Manager. The City desired to improve the wearing surface of MacArthur Boulevard and University Drive and identified the project through their Pavement Management Program indications. The rehabilitation is to extend on MacArthur Boulevard from Ford Road / Bonita Canyon Drive to the SR-73 (4,050’) and on University Drive from Jamboree Road to the east side of the SR-73 northbound ramps (2,450’) The City also desired to reconstruct deteriorated concrete flatwork, upgrade pedestrian facilities to ADA and restripe using the new 6” KEY STRENGTHS: •40+ year career of street and site pl anning, design, and construction •Variety of experience ranging from small to large street projects •Established relationship with numerous public agencies and their staffs gives her a great understanding of the needs of age ncy -sponsored projects •Experience working with both the public and private sector including cities, counties, state agencies, federal agencies, school districts, universities, and developers % AVAILABILITY: 30% TENURE AT CWE: 15 yrs REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer (California), #38798 SWPPP Developer & Practitioner, #23572 EDUCATION: B.S. in Civil Engineering Oregon State University, 1980 M.B.A., University of California, Irvine, 1988 ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 14 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com stripes with a slightly changed cross section. CWE prepared plans for pavement rehabilitation including 50’ cross sections and plan and profile. Orange County Bikeway Loop Segment D, County of Orange. WQMP & Traffic Manager. The project proposes to close the bikeway gap between the El Cajon Regional Riding and Hiking Trail (Yorba Linda) and the La Floresta Trail (Brea) by constructing a 16-foot wide Class 1 bikeway along the west side of Carbon Canyon Channel from Bastanchury Road to Imperial Highway (Placentia) and along the south side of Imperial Highway from Carbon Canyon Channel to La Floresta Drive. The total length of this segment is 3,550 feet and includes ramps to Golden Avenue. The project also included traffic signal modifications with additional vehicle signal indication and bike/pedestrian push button assemblies to the Imperial Highway/La Floresta Drive intersection, new trail lighting from La Floresta Drive to Carbon Canyon Channel, new traffic signal for mid-block bike and pedestrian crossing at Golden Avenue, and tunnel lighting at the undercrossing at Bastanchury Road. Project included the preparation of the Water Quality Management Plan and design for the inclusion of six biofiltration swales along the trail. Services included field investigation, traffic signal, coordination with SCE, signal communication, lighting design, water quality management plan, specifications, cost estimate, and construction support. State Route 1 and Huntington Street in Huntington Beach, Jacobs (CH2M), Caltrans District 12. Project Manager. Preparation of a Project Report and PS&E for upgrades to pedestrian facilities, signal improvements, pavement delineation improvements at the intersection. Prepared a Traffic Management Plan, a short-form Storm Water Data Report, plans, construction details, fact sheets for exceptions to mandatory and advisory design standards, PD-26 for right of way requirements and right of way exhibits. Plans included design of new curb ramps to meet Caltrans conservative standards, design for refreshed pavement delineation, and pedestrian detours during construction. Coordination with Caltrans for preparation of the environmental document, associated technical studies, and signal design. This project will upgrade the existing pedestrian facilities to the current American Disability Act standards. Signal modifications and pavement delineation refreshment was proposed to improve the safety at this location since there is a higher than expected accident rate. Portola Parkway Improvements at SR-241, City of Lake Forest. Project Manager. Improvements included the widening of the existing roadway and rehabilitation of center medians to provide irrigation and landscaping between El Toro Road and SR-241. Street widening connects the existing southbound right turn lane at Rancho Parkway with the SR-241 off-ramp and allows for the addition of a third southbound lane on Portola Parkway through the SR-241 interchange. As the prime consultant, prepared the civil engineering and project management for the project including the street improvements, utility coordination and improvements, and coordination with the landscape architect. Improvements also required review and approval from Caltrans District 12 which included preparation and processing of a Fact Sheet for exception to design standards to maintain existing non- standard left and right shoulder widths and nonstandard through lanes through the SR-241 interchange. Balboa Boulevard Streetscape, David Volz Design, City of Newport Beach. Principal in Charge. Project involved constructing landscaping and streetscape features along Balboa Boulevard between Coast Highway and 24th Street. The project also included construction of new landscaped center medians, tree wells in the existing sidewalk, decorative concrete and hardscape features. Responsible for all street improvements, utility coordination, relocations, modifications and adjustments. Improvements at Coast Highway required review and approval from Caltrans District 12. ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 15 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com FRANÇOIS ZUGMEYER, PE, Civil and Drainage Engineer RELEVANT PROJECTS: MacArthur Boulevard & University Drive Pavement Rehabilitation, City of Newport Beach. Project Engineer. The project included improving the wearing surface of MacArthur Boulevard and University Drive through their Pavement Management Program. The project also included reconstruction of deteriorated concrete flatwork, upgrade of pedestrian facilities to ADA and restriping. Responsibilities included cad support for design, cross sections and profiles. Bastanchury Road and Rose Drive Storm Drain Improvements, City of Yorba Linda. Project Engineer. Project involved providing civil design services for the design of a new storm drain system in Rose Drive. Varying alignments were studied in an attempt to minimize the impact to a significant number of existing utilities. Prepared a drainage report and conducted a hydrology study for all concepts and participated in the preparation of PS&E documents. Fairview Street Design Services and Bridge Replacement, City of Santa Ana. Project Engineer. The City of Santa Ana (City) requested the preparation of environmental documents design of street widening, bridge replacement, and environmental documents and regulatory permits for Fairview Street Bridge crossing over Santa Ana River. Responsibilities included Water Quality Requirements, Hydrology/Hydraulic Analyses and River Modeling, Street Design, Signage and Striping, Final Plans, Specifications, and Bid and Construction Support. I-605 Southbound Beverly Boulevard Interchange, Metro. Senior Engineer. The project includes the preparation of a Project Report and PS&E for an interchange reconfiguration in Pico Rivera, CA. The project involved preparation of a project report, geometrics, fact sheets, drainage study, storm water data report, traffic study, TMP, construction staging, coordination with Caltrans who prepared the environmental documentation, modified access report, right of way, utilities, life cycle cost analysis, landscape, geotechnical investigation, surveys, and cost estimates. Responsible for geometrics, preparation of fact sheets, the drainage report and support for the team. Rosecrans/Marquardt Grade Separation, Metro. Drainage Engineer. Responsible for preparation of hydrology study, drainage report, storm drain plans, and a Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) in accordance with County of Los Angeles requirements for the grade separation. The purpose of the project is to alleviate the current and potential traffic impacts and hazards posed by the existing at-grade rail crossing. The goals of the project include improving safety by separating pedestrians and vehicles from trains at the railroad crossing; enhancing mobility and quality of life for the community; and minimizing disruption to residents, businesses, and the community during construction. KEY STRENGTHS: •47+ year career of street and site planning, design, and construction •Heavily experienced in planning and design of street improvements •His experience includes right of way engineering, utilities, construction staging and traffic handling, detours, signing, and pavement delineation •Significant experience in projects requiring ADA compliance •Experience includes construction staging and utility coordination and involvements % AVAILABILITY: 50% TENURE AT CWE: 15 yrs REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer (California), #31046 EDUCATION: Civil Engineering E.N.S.A.I., Strasbourg, France, 1972 ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 16 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com TAMMY ALLEE, QSD/QSP, Civil and Water Quality Engineer RELEVANT PROJECTS: Orange County Bikeway Loop Segment D, County of Orange. Water Quality Engineer. The project proposes to close the bikeway gap between the El Cajon Regional Riding and Hiking Trail (City of Yorba Linda) and the La Floresta Trail (City of Brea). Bastanchury Road and Rose Drive Storm Drain Improvements, City of Yorba Linda. Project Engineer. Project involves providing civil design services for the design of a new storm drain system in Bastanchury Road. Pacific Coast Highway / Huntington Street Intersection Improvements, Caltrans 12. Support Civil Engineer. This project will upgrade the existing pedestrian facilities to the current American Disability Act (ADA) standards. This project will also upgrade the traffic signal at this intersection. LANDER PHAM, P.E., Civil Design Engineer RELEVANT PROJECTS: MacArthur Boulevard & University Drive Pavement Rehabilitation, City of Newport Beach. Assistant Engineer for cost estimates The City desired to improve the wearing surface of MacArthur Boulevard and University Drive and identified the project through their Pavement Management Program indications. Pacific Coast Highway (SR-1) Roadway Preservation Project in Two Locations, from Vista Del Sol to 7th Avenue in Laguna Beach, and from Crescent Bay Drive to Newport Coast Drive in Newport Beach, Caltrans District 12. Assistant Civil Engineer. As part of an on-call contract, this task order was to rehabilitate the existing pavement, remove and reconstruct new guard rail and upgrade and construct new curb ramps as stated in the Capital Preventive Maintenance Project Report (CAPM PR). I-605 Southbound Beverly Boulevard Interchange, Pico Rivera, California. LA METRO. Assistant Engineer. This project involved the preparation of a Project Report and PS&E for an interchange reconfiguration in Pico Rivera. % AVAILABILITY: 70% TENURE AT CWE: 7 yrs REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer (California), #87141 EDUCATION: B.S. in Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic University, Pomona, 2007 KEY STRENGTHS: •Entire experience is with public works projects •His experience includes design of roadway geometrics (horizontal and vertical), alternatives analysis, grading and drainage design, earthwork calculations, and stage construction plans, and pavement structural section design •Extensive knowledge of Microstation, Inroads, and AutoCAD KEY STRENGTHS: •Over 18 years of professional civil engineering experience in the public and private sectors •Comprehensive background includes general infrastructure and public works improvement projects, including streets, freeways, hydrology and hydraulics, utility modifications, grading, technical reports, and cost estimates % AVAILABILITY: 60% TENURE AT CWE: 4 yrs REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer (California), #34277 SWPPP Developer & Practitioner, #25572 EDUCATION: B.S. in Civil Engineering University of California, Irvine, 1979 ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 17 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com NAMRATA CARIAPA, Senior Environmental Planner RELEVANT PROJECTS: On-Call CEQA/NEPA Environmental Services and Support, LA Metro. Project Manager/Deputy Contract Manager. Responsible for managing technical teams, environmental planners, deliverables, schedule, and budget for a range of environmental planning and compliance services. On-Call Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) Entitlements and Environmental Planning, City of Los Angeles. Project Manager. $2m three-year bench contract for environmental consulting services at LAX, Van Nuys, and other LAWA property. On-Call Environmental Document and Documentation Services, Caltrans District 5. Deputy Contract Manager/Project Manager. Provided on-call environmental services for District 5. ICF provides multidisciplinary environmental services, including field surveys, environmental technical studies, community outreach assistance, and environmental compliance monitoring services during construction. BRIAN CALVERT, Environmental Lead RELEVANT PROJECTS: South Area On-Call Environmental Generalist Services, City of Los Angeles. Environmental Lead. Provided multidisciplinary environmental services, including field surveys, preparation of environmental technical studies, and construction services. Desert Area On-Call Environmental Generalist Services, Caltrans District 7. Contract Manager. provided multidisciplinary environmental services, including field surveys, preparation of environmental technical studies, community outreach assistance, and construction monitoring services. Approximately 30 task orders were issued under the two desert area on-call contracts. On-Call Environmental Consulting Services, County of Riverside. Project Manager. Work has included the preparation of environmental documents and technical studies, as well as obtaining regulatory permits. KEY STRENGTHS: •20+ years’ experience in environmental analysis and project management •Extensive knowledge in planning, transportation and infrastructure projects •Managed preparation for environmental impact reports (EIRs), EIR/environmental assessments (EAs), initial studies (IS)/EAs % AVAILABILITY: 45% TENURE AT ICF: 13 years EDUCATION: M.A., Geography and Geographical Information Systems, California State University, Northridge B.A., Economics, University of Mumbai, Sophia College, Mumbai % AVAILABILITY: 50% TENURE AT ICF: 16 years EDUCATION: B.A., Geography and Regional Science, George Washington University, Washington MEP, Master of Environmental Planning, Arizona State University, Arizona KEY STRENGTHS: •26+ years’ experience on more than 45 transportation projects •Proven ability to deliver projects on schedule and within budget •Broad experience managing planning and environmental work for transportation projects ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 18 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com RICHARD TETREAULT, PLS, Land Surveyor RELEVANT PROJECTS: Newport Boulevard, City of Costa Mesa. Terrestrial / Ground Based LiDAR Lead for the collection and reduction of 1 mile of a 6-lane highway using Ground Based LiDAR, managing Survey Horizontal and Vertical control, and data comparison Route 133, County of Orange. Party Chief/Supervisor. Project consists of 2 new lanes in each direction and median improvements from the SR-133/405 interchange to one mile south. SR-118/SR-23, County of Los Angeles. Project Manager for the proposed connection of the SR-118 to SR-23 freeway. Topographic surveys were performed, and several alignment alternatives were staked. Field data was transferred to Caltrans computers. Springville-Lindsay-Venida 66kv Reconductor Project, City of Springville. Party Chief/Project Manager. Established control and mobile mapping, using LiDAR scanning methods and locating land ties along a 17-mile route from Springville Substation to proposed Substation. LORYNE SCHAMBER, PLS, Mapping Lead RELEVANT PROJECTS: East Ball Road, City of Anaheim. Project Surveyor. Prepared a Record Data Basemap & Topography for Design Purposes over a 1-mile strip of heavily congested area. Scientific Way, City of Irvine. Project Surveyor/Party Chief. Established project control, preforming, and reducing topographic surveys. Establishing boundaries and Right-of- Ways, interpreting, and preparing easements and legal descriptions and mapping bases delineating property lines. Springville-Lindsay-Venida 66kv Reconductor Project, City of Springville. Senior Project Surveyor Established control and mobile mapping, using LiDAR scanning methods and locating land ties along a 17-mile route from Springville Substation to proposed Substation. % AVAILABILITY: 50% TENURE AT SADDLEBACK: 16 yrs REGISTRATIONS: Professional Land Surveyor (California), #7408 EDUCATION: B.S., Survey Engineering, California State University, Fresno, 1989 % AVAILABILITY: 40% TENURE AT SADDLEBACK: 16 yrs REGISTRATIONS: Professional Land Surveyor (California), #7418 EDUCATION: Survey Related Courses, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, 1986 KEY STRENGTHS: •40+ years’ experience in surveying and mapping •Experience in surveying, engineering, photogrammetry, right-of-way mapping and construction staking •Head of the Mobil Mapping and LiDAR Departments KEY STRENGTHS: •34 years’ experience in surveying and mapping •Experience in both public and private sectors •She has worked as a Consultant, Party Chief, and Senior Project Surveyor ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.5 - 19 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com DJAN CHANDRA, PE, GE, Geotechnical Engineer RELEVANT PROJECTS: Bayside Drive Improvement, City of Newport Beach. Project Engineer. Geotechnical exploration and report for the design of street improvements. The project will rehabilitate 6,700 linear feet existing pavement, replace a retaining wall at an intersection, and replacement of traffic signals and pedestrian crossings. University Drive Widening, City of Irvine. Project Manager. Geotechnical exploration for pavement design for widening of eastbound University Drive between Ridgeline Drive and the I-405 on-ramp (approximately 2,700 feet). Orange County Public Works, Brea Canyon Road Widening, County of Orange. Principal Geotechnical Engineer. Provided recommendations for foundation design for the replacement of three bridges and a new wildlife-crossing bridge, 17 retaining walls (semi-gravity cantilever, MSE, soil nail, and diaphragm walls with earth anchors), and reconstruction and rehabilitation of roadway pavement. JOHN HAERTLE, PE, GE, Geotechnical Task Manager and Engineer RELEVANT PROJECTS: Bayside Drive Improvement, City of Newport Beach. Project Manager. Geotechnical exploration and report for the design of street improvements. The project will rehabilitate 6,700 linear feet existing pavement, replace a retaining wall at an intersection, and replacement of traffic signals and pedestrian crossings. Orange County Public Works, Brea Canyon Road Widening, County of Orange. Lead Design Engineer. Provided recommendations for foundation design for the replacement of three bridges and a new wildlife-crossing bridge, 17 retaining walls, and reconstruction and rehabilitation of roadway pavement. Sunset Ridge Park, City of Newport Beach. Project Engineer for geotechnical investigation and design recommendations for the proposed 12-acre open space municipal park. Plans for the park include sports fields, tot lots, skate parks, natural and passive park areas, restroom buildings, and parking lots. KEY STRENGTHS: •30+ years’ experience providing geotechnical engineering consulting services •Project experience is wide ranging, from municipal/civic facilities to pedestrian/bike trails, roadways, highways, bridges, and water infrastructure •Experience includes designs and reviews construction plans and specifications KEY STRENGTHS: •25+ years of professional geotechnical engineering solutions •Expertise in public works and water works infrastructure and facility and commercial and residential development projects •Provides high-quality, professionally prepared geotechnical engineering % AVAILABILITY: 40% TENURE AT LEIGHTON CONSULTING: 15 years REGISTRATIONS: Civil Engineer (California), #50068 Geotechnical Engineer (California), #2376 EDUCATION: M.S., Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University % AVAILABILITY: 40% TENURE AT LEIGHTON CONSULTING: 15 years REGISTRATIONS: Civil Engineer (California), #48039 Geotechnical Engineer (California), #2532 EDUCATION: M.S., Civil Engineering, University of Wisconsin- Madison ORIGINALCity of Hermosa Beach RFQ 20-06 6.3 Required Forms 6.3.1 Certification of Proposal RFQ #: _20-06__ The undersigned hereby submits its proposal and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFQ). 1.Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Proposal, Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. 2.By submitting the response to this request, Proposer agrees, if selected to furnish services to the City in accordance with this RFQ. 3.Proposer has carefully reviewed its proposal and understands and agrees that the City is not responsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the Proposer and that the Proposer is responsible for them. 4.It is understood and agreed that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals and to waive any informality or irregularity in any proposal received by the City. 5.The proposal response includes all of the commentary, figures and data required by the Request for Proposal 6.The proposal shall be valid for 90 days from the date of submittal. 7.Proposer acknowledges that the City may issue addendums related to this RFQ and that the proposer has reviewed the following addendums which have been issued: Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ 8.Proposer further acknowledges the provisions of any addendums issued have been incorporated into their proposal. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: _Marie Marston, President___________________ Page of 31 34 N/A 3.2.6 Required Forms ORIGINALCity of Hermosa BeachRFQ 20-06 6.3.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit RFQ #: _20-06__ The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.This proposal is not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation. 2.This proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham. 3.I have not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Proposer to put in a false or sham proposal and I have not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any other Proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal or to refrain from submitting to this RFQ. 4.I have not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the proposal price or to secure any advantage against the City of Hermosa Beach or of anyone interested in the proposed contract. 5.All statements contained in the Proposal and related documents are true. 6.I have not directly or indirectly submitted the proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any person, corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, RFQ depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. 7.I have not entered into any arrangement or agreement with any City of Hermosa Beach public officer in connection with this proposal. 8.I understand collusive bidding is a violation of State and Federal law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: _Marie Marston, President__ Page of 32 34 ORIGINALCity of Hermosa BeachRFQ 20-06 6.3.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements RFQ #: __20-06_______ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with the City’s insurance requirements contained within this RFQ. The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the insurance requirements as specified in the Request for Proposal. 2.If selected, proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: _Marie Marston, President Page of 33 34 ORIGINALCity of Hermosa BeachRFQ 20-06 6.3.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement RFQ #: _20-06__ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City’s Professional Services Agreement. Proposers should identify and/or indicate any exceptions to the Sample Professional Services Agreement included in Section 6.2. The City Attorney or their designee retains the discretion to accept or reject proposed exceptions or modifications to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the conditions specified in the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement. 2.Proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein with exceptions noted as follows: __N/A________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Representative: ___________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: __Marie Marston, President__________________ Page of 34 34 ORIGINAL On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.7 - 1 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com 3.2.7 Fee Schedule As requested in the City’s RFQ, the cost proposal is submitted separately. design smarter. build better. 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA 92805 (714) 533.3050 www.oe-eng.com City of Hermosa Beach November 19th, 2020 City Clerk Office Attn: Romany Basilyous 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach CA, 90254 SUBJECT: RFQ# 20-06, ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS Onward Engineering (OE) is pleased to submit our qualifications to the City of Hermosa Beach to provide On- Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements for a contract period of 3 years with an expected commencement date of January, 2021, with up to four (4) possible 1-year extensions. At OE, our team is focused on how infrastructure impacts people. Beyond the numbers, technical data, and calculations, infrastructure is a lifeline for our communities. Our purpose is always to deliver infrastructure that improves the quality of life in the communities we serve. Innovation is woven into the culture at Onward Engineering; and it allows us to continue building upon our extraordinary track record as a firm that always acts with integrity, committed to seeing projects through to fruition. OE has the experience to provide engineering design services on ALL of the designated services as requested in the City's RFP. OE has provided design engineering services to many Southern California cities including South Bay cities such as Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, Torrance, Rancho Palos Verdes, Lawndale, Lomita, and the nearby City of Long Beach. We also have a ton of experience working for beach cities such as Santa Monica, Newport Beach, and Laguna Beach. Finally, we understand how to work in cities where residents and businesses are heavily invested and involved, such as the City of Irvine, La Habra Heights, and the City of Diamond Bar. We invite the City to give OE a chance to showcase our abilities, and to exceed your expectations, becoming your consultant of choice. The City endeavors to retain a high quality of life. OE places community at the heart of its projects. This means OE acts as a strong advocate for the City, while also interfacing with the public when necessary to communicate the value of the improvements proposed. OE understands the human element of the industry, and can work to help the City achieve these goals and improving the quality of life in the communities we serve. The City also places a high value on economic and fiscal stability, so that the community can remain sustainable and resilient. OE understands this commitment and will provide the City with value engineering and cost-benefit analysis on our design projects. OE will also keep the City apprised of the design budget, including hours remaining, resource allocation matrix, earned-value reports, and more. The City is additionally committed to demonstrating their environmental leadership. OE has experience utilizing alternative rehabilitation methods in our design documents. Finally, the City aims to be a catalyst for innovation. OE is leading the industry in utilizing technology to achieve innovation. I would like to thank the City of Hermosa Beach for the opportunity to submit our qualifications. If you have any questions, or would like any additional information, please feel free to contact me at: (714) 533-3050, or by email at: mataya@oe-eng.com. We have read, understand, and accept all terms and conditions as set forth in the City of Hermosa Beach’s RFP and Professional Services Agreement, with no exceptions. We look forward to a successful relationship with the City of Hermosa Beach and we thank you for the opportunity to serve. Thank you, Majdi Ataya, PE President Section 3.2.2: Firm Profile 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 2 firm profile3.2.2: It is the mission of Onward Engineering (OE) to provide a new standard of consulting services to our clients. In doing so, we wish to improve the quality of life in the communities that we serve. MISSIO N S T AT EMENTMAJDI ATAYA, PE qa /qc manager 300. S Harbor b oulevard Suite 814, a na Heim, C a . 92805 (714) 533-3050 mataya@oe-eng .Com POiNT O F C ONTACT300300 s . harbor blvd.s . harbor blvd. suitesuite 814 814 anaheimanaheim , , caca .. 9280592805 singlesingle officeoffice locationlocation pp:(714) 533-3050:(714) 533-3050 ff:(714) 948-8978:(714) 948-8978 federalfederal idid #800101723#800101723 FIRM DETAIL S INCORPORATED2004 as a “C” Corporation in the State of California, Wholly owned by Majdi Ataya. 15 YEARS IN BUSINESS 30 EMPLOYEES FiRM hiST O R yOE has completed all of its agreed upon contracts with no history of failures or refusals. STATEMENT OF PROJECT UNDERSTANDiNG project understanding & approach3.2.3: The City of Hermosa Beach is seeking qualified professional firms for on-call engineering design services related to streets, intersections, roadways and pavement widening, improvements, reconstruction, calming, and resurfacing, complete streets, green streets, bike lanes, beautification, preventative maintenance, pavement management system, roadway lighting, improvements on parking lots, road, parkway and driveway, curb, gutter, median, cross gutter, walkway and curb extention, waterways and watermains, sewer, and ADA ramps for design compliance upgrades. Streets are our bread-and-butter, and they make up the majority of our experience. When it comes to streets, our team is the very best. OE has made it a practiced standard to always navigate as much cost savings as possible on any Client project while maintaining a high level of quality. When noting the current budgeting adjustments the City of Hermosa Beach, and other Cities at large, have had to make during these times, our experience spanning years of cost saving practices are beneficial now more than ever, and we are abundantly prepared to deliver cost savings to the City of Hermosa Beach. We echo the same sentiment said by the City of Hermosa Beach's City Manager - Capital improvements are often those most-visible and critical projects in a community...capital projects reflect the community’s vision and help us achieve Council priorities...many of these projects are critical to ensure that we adequately maintain our City assets and prepare for the future. The City's FY 2020-21 Capital Improvement Program totals a budget of approximately $17.8 million, with $4 million budgeted towards street and highway improvements. OE has served nearby Cities of Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach, Torrance, and Long Beach on a variety of street improvement design projects. We are familiar with the area as well as the unique challenges of a coastal city, which include urgency in maintaining the schedule, different responses to specific rehabilitation methods due to the weather and climate, traffic and safety construction and specific phasing requirements, and the importance of cyclist and pedestrian access. We can navigate these items well, especially in these uncertain times, where the City may be concerned about missed deadlines, slow response time, and a lack of continuity. With OE, this will not be an issue. OE has doubled our staff of Project Engineers. Our team also has the tools in place to collaborate internally and with the City. We utilize Microsoft Teams to communicate project progress. Our use of Box Enterprise allows the City to review project documents in real-time, and our proprietary scheduling tool, Onward Collab, gives the City Gantt Chart and Task List views of the project schedule so that the City can check progress, resource allocation, and planned deliverable dates. To summarize, OE is poised and ready to hit the ground running, with little to no “adjustment period.” TOTAL CIP FUNDING Fy 20-21 General Fund, State Gas/Tax, Tyco, Park/Rec Facility Tax, Cdbg, Prop C, R, M, W, Grants, Sewer & Storm Drain Fund, RTI Undersea Cable & Cable Tidelands Fund, Capital Improvement Fund PROJECT COST Bus Stop Improvements $900,000 PCH Mobility Improvement Project (on hold)$541,680 Street Improvements - Various Locations $1,609,000 Hermosa Ave. Green Street $140,000 Strand Bikeway & Walkway Improvements at 35th St.$10,000 Annual Street & Striping Improvements $350,000 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements $450,000 TOTAL $4,000,680 Section 3.2.3: Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 3 PROJECT ENGiNEER 65% AvAilAble amY flores 1 Year of Experience Bs:Civil Engineering - CalPoly Pomona (fall 2020) mesa:Math, Engineering, Science Achievement soft Ware :AutoCAD, ArcGis, AutoDesk, & MetLab Bilingual (fluent) - English & Spanish PROJECT ENGiNEER 60% AvAilAble daYton loWe 18 Years of Experience octa:Certified in Pavement Assessment, Rehabilitation & Recommendation cad:AutoCAD & Civil3D Certified Technology, Management, Construction & Civil Engineering -Broward College PROJECT ENGiNEER 80% AvAilAble rYan dennIs, PE 15 Years of Experience Bs:Civil Engineering - 2005 minor:Environmental Engineering - 2005 pe:Licensed Professional Engineer-Canada cad:AutoCAD & Civil3D Certified PROJECT MANAGER 70% AvAilAble justIn smeets,PE, PLS, QSD 16 Years of Experience Bs:Civil Engineering - CSUF, 2007 pe:Licensed Professional Engineer #178314 pls:Professional Land Surveyor #9293 Qsd:Qualified Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Developer #00852 PROJECT MANAGER 65% AvAilAble ludY smeets , PE 38 Years of Experience Bs:Civil Engineering - CSULB, 1979 ma:Military Science - A&M, 1990 us arm Y:Command & General Staff College, 1989 pe:Licensed Professional Engineer #37221 memBer:APWA, ASCE, NSPE, SAME PROJECT MANAGER 100% AvAilAble donald hoppe, PE 40 Years of Experience Bs:Civil Engineering - CalPoly Pomona ma:Public Administration - CSUF pe:Licensed Professional Engineer #34820 octa:Technical Steering Committee PROJECT MANAGER 80% AvAilAble I g nacI o ochoa , PE, TE, PTOE 39 Years of Experience Bs:Civil Engineering - CSULB pe:Licensed Professional Engineer #35217 te:Licensed Traffic Engineer #1183 toe:Traffic Operations Professional former Director & City Engineer QA/QC MANAGeR 70% AvAilAble majd I ataYa , PE 39 Years of Experience Bs:Civil Engineering - CSULB, 1981 mpa :Full Coursework - CSULB, 1993 pe:Licensed Professional Engineer #39392 former Deputy Director of Public Works & City Engineer - City of La Habra PROJECT ENGiNEER 70% AvAilAble aleX lIu, EIT, ENV SP 7 Years of Experience Bs:Civil Engineering - CalPoly Pomona, 2014 as:Mathematics - Mt. San Antonio College eit:Engineer-in-Training #163008 Trilingual (fluent) - English, Mandarin, Cantonese PROJECT ENGiNEER 65% AvAilAble rIleY moore 3 Years of Experience Bs:Civil Engineering - CalPoly Pomona, 2020 as:Architectural Design - OCC, 2020 soft Ware :AutoCAD, Civil 3D, MicroStation, Revit, BlueBeam, & HDL PROJECT ENGiNEER 75% AvAilAble KIm murIllo, EIT 3 Years of Experience Bs:Civil Engineering - CalPoly Pomona, 2018 e I t:Engineer-in-Training #164995 soft Ware :AutoCAD, MicroStation, & InRoads PROJECT MANAGERS PROJECT ENGiNEERS ORGANIZATIONAL ChART Topographic Survey cl surveYing Lam Le, PLS | Professional Land Surveyor POTHOLING c BeloW Richard Koury, PE | President Geotechnical Investigation tWining IncTWINING Amir Ghavibazoo, PhD | Pavement Engineer & Asphalt Material Specialist SUB-CONSULTANTS Section 3.2.3: Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 4 APPROACh TO wORk PROGRAM APPROACh TO ENGINEERING DESIGN The City of Hermosa Beach is seeking on-call civil engineering services including utility research, relocation and notification, a detailed site assessment and documentation of site conditions, conducting surveys, potholing and geotechnical investigation of pavement section and subgrade, provide recommendations for improvements, assessing the pavement and providing complete recommendations, assessing damaged concrete infrastructure for reconstruction, preparing plans, specifications, and estimates including Traffic Control Plans, and providing Project Management support services. DRONE MAPPiNG ASPHALT UPHEAVEL ADA RAMP DETAIL A site assessment can be enhanced with the collection of high-resolution aerial photographs of project streets using our drone. Our team has three remote pilots licensed by the FAA to fly drones for commercial use. Such aerial photographs allow us to accurately denote site surface features, utility notification markings, and street striping, as well as providing us with highly detailed reference data that cannot be achieved through traditional site evaluation methods. Additionally, the images collected are at a higher resolution than images provided by other sources and are ideal for use in the preparation of exhibits. The sample images above and below, collected for a previous project, demonstrate the level of detailed information that can be collected using drone technology. The aerial photos collected are merged into a composite image in post-processing to create complete street segments with very high levels of detail. 5 ft. X 40 ft. DIGOUT5 ft. x 40 ft. DIGOUT STREET REhABiLiTATiON A final determination of the rehabilitation methods to be applied to a project are made following a detailed site evaluation, review of pavement management study and geotechnical data, development of a preliminary cost estimate for all construction components, and discussions with the City. In addition to traditional rehabilitation methods, OE can assess the potential benefits of incorporating emerging technologies into a design at the City’s request. The cost of these technologies varies; however, they typically result in up-front cost savings in labor and material costs for long-term savings by providing a street with service life comparable to one that has been reconstructed at a reduced price. These emerging technologies are included on the following page: Section 3.2.3: Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 5 RECLAIMED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (RAP) Options to recycle the material milled from the streets of a project can be evaluated if there is sufficient surface area to be rehabilitated, making this rehabilitation method economically viable. There are several methods that utilize RAP, including: Hot Recycling Hot & Cold In-Place Recycling Cold Central Plant Recycling Full Depth Reclamation The determination of which methods may be feasible for a project will depend on street geometry and structural section, project logistics, and available construction budgets. Studies have historically demonstrated that the inclusion of RAP in the pavement design results in a pavement of similar or better quality than pavement constructed using conventional methods. Depending on the RAP method utilized, cost savings can be realized by reducing the amount of new asphalt cement or binder used, transportation costs, and disposal costs. Cold-mix methods can also result in reduced disruptions to traffic flow due to reduced curing times. Utilizing RAP methods also demonstrates Environmental Stewardship by recycling non-renewable resources, reducing waste to landfills, minimizing air emissions, and conserving energy. FIBER REINFORCED ASPHALT Fiber additives can be incorporated into full depth pavement layers, overlays, and slurry seals to improve the tensile strength, crack resistance, and service life of the pavement. Fiber reinforced asphalt has been utilized on projects by numerous Cities and Counties throughout Southern California. Cost savings can be realized by extending the pavement life and by reducing the required pavement thicknesses, as compared to conventional asphalt mixes. STREET DESIGN IN CIVIL 3D Existing street sections are evaluated by converting topographic survey data into a 3-dimensional surface in AutoCAD Civil 3D. Any existing street crown heights and cross-slopes are assessed and adjusted as necessary to tie into any curb and gutter elevations. Proposed street surfaces, curbs, and gutters are also created as a 3-dimensional surface. The software allows for surface elevations and slopes to be reported at any given point and it dynamically updates the values when changes are made to the design. The software also allows for the simulation of rainfall to ensure surface run-off flows from street crowns to gutters as intended. GREEN STREET DESIGN The City of Hermosa Beach places a strong commitment to Green Street Design. The primary intention is to capture surface run-off before it enters any storm sewer system to minimize the pollutants discharged into the receiving water bodies (i.e. lakes, rivers, etc.). Green Street features can also reduce the load placed on the storm sewer system and reduce flooding during peak rainfall. As an added benefit, Green Street features also improve the aesthetics of the streets. Some of the design features considered for incorporation into storm sewer systems are summarized below. Suitability of these methods are partially dependent on any existing infiltration rates of subsoils and anticipated surface runoff volumes. LANDSCAPiNg Careful planning of existing vegetation utilized in landscaped areas can have a noticeable effect on stormwater retention rates. Drought resistant plants such as succulents can be incorporated into designs as they have a much greater water retention capacity than other plants. Additionally, the planting of trees or larger plants with broad leaves with high transpiration rates (the rate at which water is drawn into the roots and evaporated from the leaves) can also be beneficial. Section 3.2.3: Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 6 BiOFiLTRATiON & BiOSwALES Biofiltration utilizes several different layers of media to retain, filter, and disperse stormwater runoff into existing subsoils. Components may include plants, mulch, soil, sand/gravel, and perforated pipe. Biofiltration does require some maintenance to prevent bio-clogging. MODuLAR BiOFiLTRATiON uNiTS Several companies offer modular, prefabricated biofiltration units that can be configured to meet the specific requirements of a project. Typically, these systems utilize proprietary filtering media which may offer higher removal rates of pollutants when compared to traditional biofiltering methods, as well as options to incorporate additional retention space in the form of prefabricated storage modules. While more expensive than traditional biofiltration construction, these modular units provide easier maintenance and access to the filter media to prevent bio-clogging. iNFiLTRATiON wELLS & TRENCHES Infiltration wells typically consist of perforated pipe surrounded by clean aggregate and filter fabric with a sand filter base. Infiltration wells can capture a large volume of surface run-off which then can be slowly dispersed into the surrounding subsoil. Proper placement of infiltration wells can reduce surface flow which will also reduce soil erosion rates. Infiltration trenches consist of linear ditches that contain highly permeable soils (aggregate). Infiltration trenches can quickly contain large volumes of water but may not provide the same pollutant removal benefits provided by biofilters due to the lack of biological media and the rate at which the surface runoff disperses into the soil. Infiltration trenches are also prone to clogging, similar to the other filtering methods. DESiGN PL ANS & SPECIFICATIONS DEVELOPMENT All OE design plans are compliant with the latest editions of the American Public Works Association (APWA) Standard Plans for Public Works Construction, the American Public Works Association Standard Plans, and the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Standards. For State Highway improvements, the Caltrans Standard Plans are adhered to for Specifications, whichever takes precedence. The latest edition of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual and the Los Angeles County Hydrology Manual will be followed, and all materials and other testings will adhere to The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). The City of Hermosa Beach Standard Plans will be used when made available by the City, along with the City's boilerplates. All plans are developed using current AutoCAD Civil 3D software. OE’s design team has extensive experience with the software and can use it to its full potential. The Civil 3D environment dynamically links objects allowing us to immediately see the effects to material quantities and costs as design changes are implemented. The software also provides us with tools to simulate drainage surface run-off, instantly calculate grades at any given point on the surface of the design, and visualize the designs in 3-dimensions as they would appear when constructed. The combination of these tools assists in efficiently and accurately developing the optimal design for each project. ADA Ramp Detail 3D Ramp Detail TASKS DELIVERABLES KICK-OFF MEETINg meeting minutes & agenda digital copy of project schedule (to be updated as necessary) RESEARCH/REVIEw AVAILABLE DATA existing records matrix digital copies of existing records (roadway, right-of-way, utility) uTILITY RESEARCH & NOTIFICATION utility contact matrix 1st, 2nd & final utility notices utility notification log correspond with each utility owner (digital copies each) SITE EVAL u ATION site evaluation notes & photos pavement marking street inventory (digital copy each) ENVIRONMENTAL STuDIES & PERMITS (if necessary) environmental report necessary permits TOPOgRAPHIC S u RVEY (if necessary) survey notes topographic survey basemap (CADD Civil 3D survey files) gEOTECHNICAL INVESTIgATION(if necessary) pavement report core & soil samples TRAFFIC STuDIES(if necessary)traffic index report CALTRANS COORDINATION (if necessary) uTILITY POTHOLINg(per pothole) potholing summary (digital copy) SiTE EVALUATiONPHASE1 TASKS DELIVERABLES BASE SHEETS base maps street/right-of-way/utility meeting minutes & agenda project schedule (digital copies of each) (to be updated as necessary) PREPARE CONCEPT PLANS concept design plans (1st submittal-digital copy) DRAINAg E STuDIES drainage report (digital copy) 2 ND S u B MITTAL PS&E design plans (2nd submittal-digital copy) engineer’s estimate project specifications (digital copy-Microsoft Word) PHASE2 PRELiMiNARy DESiGN TASKS DELIVERABLES 3 RD S u B MITTAL PS&E design plans (3rd submittal-digital copy) engineer’s estimate project specifications (digital copy-Microsoft Word) meeting minutes & agenda project schedule (digital copies of each) (to be updated as necessary) FINAL PS&E final plans (hard copy-24” x 36” double matt 4mm mylar sheets-signed & stamped) final engineer’s estimate final construction cost estimate (digital & hard copies each) complete PS&E package (digital copy-CD in AutoCAD & PDF formats) PHASE3 FiNAL DESiGN BID ASSISTANCE & CONSTRuCTION SuPPORT DELIVERABLES Respond to Requests for Information (within 3 working days) Prepare and Issue Addenda Review Submittals Review Shop Drawings (1 week period) Attend Pre-Construction Meetings Attend Monthly Meetings (if required) Assist in Permits Assist in Regulatory Agencies Review and Approve Change Orders Conduct Final Walk-Through Prepare Construction Punch List Certify Completion PHASE4 CONSTRUCTiON SUPPORT DESiGN ENGiNEERiNG SCOPE OF wORk Section 3.2.3: Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 7 Section 3.2.4: Project Management Plan 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 8 PUBLiC OUTREACh Public Works projects are in many ways public outreach projects, in that they showcase what the City’s Public Works Department is doing. This means that having a plan for minimizing interruption, garnering public support, and maintaining a positive public perception throughout construction is critical to the overall success of the project. This aspect is often overlooked by consultants. But at OE, we place an emphasis on public outreach and the dissemination of project information to affected stakeholders. Because we find that an informed public means less complaints, safer construction sites, and a smooth construction schedule. TELEPhONE hOTLiNE The City will be provided with a hotline as the contact number for the duration of a project life cycle. All calls are tracked, so call logs with caller information, time of call, and voice-mail can easily be generated and saved. Upon setup, callers will be greeted by a brief pre-recorded introduction, after which a vocalized menu will offer helpful project information, such as street closures, parking restrictions and schedule changes. They will then have the option to be routed to a task specific staff member. This system is completely customizable, where the contact person can be changed throughout the course of a project, and the system works even if phases are handled by different consultants. This available resource provides peace of mind to the community, knowing the option to voice their concerns and obtain information is a phone call away. This method of consolidation also means less headaches for the City. iNFORMATiVE wEB PAGE OE offers informative web pages1, hosted on a separate sub-domain linked directly to the City’s website. This allows OE to directly produce and update all public notices (PDFs), project information and updates, and dynamic maps without requiring City time and resources through the process. The website will also include enhanced public notices2 which we will prepare for the Contractor on behalf of the City. These notices are a great way for residents to be made aware of the project, to actually read the notices, and to follow any driving or parking restrictions. iNTERACTiVE wEB MAPS OE supplies interactive and dynamic maps to keep the public informed. Stakeholders can easily access our maps online for updates on detours, phasing, temporary parking, street closures, and general project information. OE manages and updates the site and content in real-time in accordance with City requirements. This provides the City with easy-to-access content for oversite and to disseminate valuable information. To view project pages and map, please visit: www.oe-eng.com/dbarea5 Public Notices Sample22 Section 3.2.4: Project Management Plan 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 9 project management plan3.2.4: The City of Hermosa Beach is requesting Project Management services that will include attending meetings, assessing and establishing project goals, strategies, and cost limitations, communicating with the City to keep them apprised of a project’s status, providing agendas and minutes for various meetings, preparing and submitting project scheduling progress updates, monitoring and controlling a project schedule, budget and quality, along with proactive general Project Management services. By implementing this approach, we feel that we are pro-actively ensuring quality and the successful management of any given project, as these steps correlate to the Project Management Institute Standards for Project Management. QA /QC APPROACh QUALiT y CONTROL Plan checks ensure that the plans meet the 5 C’s: consistent, clear, correct, constructible, and complete. Our Project Engineers and Project Managers recognize that quality is the result of several processes. It requires many individuals performing many appropriate activities at the right time during the plan development process. Quality Control does not solely consist of a review after a product is complete. It is an approach and a realization that quality is something that occurs throughout the design process. Quality Control means performing all activities in conformance with valid requirements, no matter how large or small their overall contribution would be to the design process. Good CAD techniques, attention to detail, and ensuring plans are correct and useful to the contractor are also essential to quality. OE’s design team follows the Firm’s established design policies, procedures, standards and guidelines in the preparation and review of all design products for compliance and good engineering practice, as directed by the Project Quality Control Plan. QUALiTy ASSURANCE Achieving design quality is the foundation for keeping costs under control during construction. Nothing is more important than design quality. It must be stressed during all stages of project delivery, including concept development, preliminary design, detailed design, and bid and award. Effective Construction Management (CM) begins during design because the costs of CM, including change orders and claims, are largely determined by design quality. Emphasizing design quality and design clarity is the surest way to minimize the amount of change orders and construction costs. There is no better or more effective way to control total project costs and return on investment than producing well-documented, well designed plans and specifications (PS&E). Quality assurance is a proactive measure taken to check that the systems and procedures are in conformance with the City’s requirements and expectations. Plans and specifications must be of high quality, which means they must be clear and understandable, complete, accurate, consistent, and constructible. 3 Direct Execution Manage Execution Provide QA Manage Team Manage Stakeholders Distribute Info eXec u t e 5 Close-Out Project Prep Discoveries Document Complianceclosing 1 Develop Goals Visit Job Site Establish Objectives Identify Stakeholders initia t e 4 Monitor/Control Work Verify & Control Scope Control Risk Schedule Control Cost Perform QA Report Problemscont rol 2 Define Scope Select Team Calculate Budget Calculate Schedule Plan Communication Document Control Set QA/QC Plan plan 5 step approach SuBMITTED DOCuMENTS 1INITIAL PEER REVIEW 2PROJECT MANAGER REVIEW 3QA/QC REVIEW 3 TIER REViEw 1 GROUND LEVEL Drafting & Calculations Document Formatting2PROJECT MANAGEMENT LEVEL Design & Project Intent Compliance 3QA/QC LEVEL Document Completion Ensures “Biddable” Plans Section 3.2.4: Project Management Plan 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 10 COMMUNiCATiONS APPROACh ViRTUAL MEETiNGS The City will require a firm that is ready to collaborate and deliver on this assignment despite the special circumstances we find ourselves in. Our team uses Microsoft Teams to collaborate on projects, both internally and with our clients. This allows us to setup live video conferences for status meetings, review plans digitally with the City using screen share capability to provide clarifications and talk through any issues or concerns. PROJECT CONTROLS OE utilizes a set of technology-based project controls to manage cost, schedule, and documents and to deliver real-time project related updates and reports with 24/7 access of the project files to City team members, and allowing our team to keep the project on track. In addition, these tools serve to provide a dynamic repository of data, which we can use to seamlessly store, access, share and disseminate important project details. As a result, the City benefits from great increases in project transparency, collaboration, clarity and communication, as well as provide cost-cutting measures. COST CONTROL One of our core corporate philosophies is honesty and transparency. We use Advanced Financial Software to prepare invoices and reports, which allows the City to request billing statements at any time in the billing cycle. We can also send a real-time report of hours and expenses, letting the City easily compare proposed resources to resources used and/or remaining. DOCUMENT CONTROL OE operates on a HIPAA Certified, enterprise grade, cloud filing system that will be used on all documents and folders to ensure proper documentation and transparency. We map all of the City’s standards, folder structure, templates and document formats and store it on our cloud-based ENTERPRISE account for implementation. This cloud-based account allows for secure, remote access and review of our entire filing system by City staff, to ensure that documentation and filing is done in compliance with the project requirements. Each City staff member attached to the project will be able to select a password which provides access to view, upload, or download any of the project files ( PS&E, submittals, project progress, Lab and Field Test Reports, Meeting Minutes, etc.) without having to change the City’s existing IT framework. This document control system is also compliant with Caltrans’ LAPM filing requirements. Additionally, this flexibility allows the City staff access to the project files anywhere and on any device, as well as provide access to select files (like photos) to other collaborators. SChEDULiNG The OE team values time, for both our clients and our team members. To keep projects efficient, on track, and to maintain transparency, our investment in scheduling tools include Microsoft Project and Microsoft Primavera, along with course participation by our in-house staff. Every time we submit a proposal, we prepare a Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule which corresponds to our resource allocation chart and fee proposal. CPM scheduling is highly useful as it allows OE to digitally input, analyze, modify, and share project scheduling. When preparing the schedules, OE consider resources, tasks, relationships and durations. OE makes use of this information to maximize efficiency. When awarded a contract, our team updates the schedule with the Notice to Proceed date. This is then imported into our proprietary solution “Onward Collab” which the City will then have full access to. From there, OE can seamlessly document and assign tasks and subtasks. The result is that the details and the progress of the project would be available at all times to be tracked by the City and by our QA/QC team in real-time. Project Managers are then enabled to assess the workload of every team member at any given time, so that immediate adjustments can be made to the project. For example, if additional resources are needed to meet a milestone, the City would have immediate access to all change details. This system also allows for back and forth dialogue regarding a specific task or subtask. The full conversation addressing that item is centralized and can be reviewed at any point. Another view that can be utilized is the Board View. This shows buckets of tasks, with each bucket representing a team member. Moving tasks by a drag and drop, this gives the City clarity as to who is doing what and how much work is on their plate. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 11 SUMMARy OF RELEVANT PROJECTS Philip Wang, PE, Associate Engineer | (562) 804-1424 x2254 | pwang@bellflower.org 16600 Civic Center Drive, Bellflower, CA. 90706 BELLFLOwER BLVD. COMPLETE STREETS-hSIP FUNDED BellfloWer 2020to present begin & end date $135,000 ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe Alex Liu Kim Murillo Amy Flores Riley Moore OE provided the City of Bellflower with Design Engineering services for the HSIP – Bellflower Boulevard Complete Streets Project. The project consists of enhancing approximately 2,200 linear feet (0.42 miles) of Bellflower Boulevard from Artesia Boulevard to the South City Limit, approximately 330 feet south of Rose Street. Bellflower Boulevard is an arterial street with two lanes of traffic and curbside parking in both directions, a dual left turn lane, and traffic signals at high volume intersections. The project was partially funded by Cycle 9 of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The project has an estimated cost of $1,162,100. The street enhancements included adding Class III Bike Lanes, reducing the lane widths, adding raised medians with landscaping and irrigation, upgrading and adding high visibility crosswalks, rapid flashing beacons, and pedestrian countdown heads at the intersections, bulb-outs, and road resurfacing. Kimberly Molina Young, Senior Civil Engineer (now in the City of Fontana) | (909) 350-7632 kyoung@fontana.org | 16489 Orange Way, Fontana, CA 92335 7-yEAR ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ROADwAy REhABILITATION PROJECT diamond Bar 2010to 2018 begin & end date $1.6 million ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Ludy Smeets Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe OE provided Design Engineering, Construction Management and Inspection services to the City of Diamond Bar on their annual arterial and residential roadway maintenance projects for an annual period of 7 years. Years 2010 and 2011 were awarded as separate contracts. The City awarded us an additional 3-year contract for 2012–2014. In 2015, the City of Diamond Bar awarded us yet another annual rehabilitation project. The project sizes and costs were: 2010: 11.8 miles of arterial & residential streets ($908 K), 2011: 19 miles of arterial & residential streets ($1.8 M), 2012: 10 miles of arterial & residential streets ($1.1 M), 2013: 13 miles of arterial & residential streets ($1.3 M), 2014: 14.5 miles of residential, arterial & collector streets ($1.8 M), 2015: 14 miles of residential, arterial & collector streets ($1.75 M) and 2016/2017: 16.6 miles of residential and collector streets ($1.58 million). The general scope of work for each year’s project included localized R&R patching, grind and overlay, cape and slurry seal, traffic loops, traffic striping, and required heavy traffic phasing and traffic control review. OE assisted the City through the project bidding phase, developing text and stipulations for the bid package to ensure contractor availability during the desired working months. Due to freeway proximity, coordination with Caltrans to obtain encroachment permits for the City on four of these projects was essential. Jacki Scott, Public Works Director & Analyst | (949) 362-4337 | jscott@cityoflagunaniguel.org 30111 Crown Valley Pkwy., Laguna Niguel, CA. 92677 NIGUEL ROAD STREET REhABILITATION PROJECT laguna niguel 2020to present begin & end date $189,611 ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe Alex Liu Kim Murillo Amy Flores Riley Moore OE is providing the City of Laguna Niguel with Design Engineering services on the Niguel Road Street Rehabilitation Project. The project consists of rehabilitating an approximately 1.93 mile (10,200-foot) section of Niguel Road that extends from Alta Tera to Marina Hills Drive. Niguel Road from Highland Avenue to Marina Hills Drive (8,450 linear feet) is an arterial street with two lanes of traffic in either direction, raised center medians or centerline striping, left and right-turn pockets, and bike lanes. Niguel Road from Alta Terra to Highland Avenue is a residential collector street (1,750-feet) with one lane of traffic in both directions. Parking is prohibited on the street except on the north side of Niguel Road from Alta Terra to Galina Way. Additional tasks included repairing curb, gutter, and sidewalk and constructing ADA compliant access ramps where required. e Xperience & Qualifications3.2.5: Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 12 Jennifer Rosales, Project Manager | (714) 754-5180 | jennifer.rosales@costamesaca.gov 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 NEwPORT BOULEVARD wIDENING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT costa mesa 2019 begin & end date $457,000 ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Ludy Smeets Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe Alex Liu Kim Murillo Amy Flores Riley Moore OE is providing the City of Costa Mesa with Design Engineering services. The project consists of widening a portion 77 Fair Drive of southbound Newport Boulevard to accommodate a fourth through lane and improve its Level of Service from the current “F” rating, with a range beginning at 1.10 and ending at 1.30. The section of roadway to be enhanced extends approximately 2,700 linear feet southwest from 19th Street to the Superior Avenue turn-off located northeast of 17th Street. The project is located within the jurisdiction of State Caltrans and the work required includes traffic signal modifications, utility and street light relocations, and right-of way acquisitions to accommodate the additional through lane and right-turn pockets. Paul Lubliner, Associate Engineer| (714) 738-6886 | plubliner@cityoffullerton.com 303 West Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton, CA. 92832 EUCLiD ROADwAy & SEwER RECONSTRUCTiON PROJECT fullerton 2019to present begin & end date $114,000 ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Ludy Smeets Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe Alex Liu Kim Murillo Amy Flores Riley Moore OE provided Design Engineering services to the City of Fullerton on this Roadway and Sewer Reconstruction Project. The project consisted of reconstructing or resurfacing approximately 3,700 linear feet of arterial streets between Fern Drive and Williamson Avenue and replacing approximately 1,700 feet of sewer mains between Malvern Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue. The sewer work included removing the existing 10-inch VCP and replacing it with new 12-inch VCP pipe between Commonwealth and Malvern and removing and replacing sewer north of Malvern to the end of the street project limits at Fern without upsizing. The worked also included removing the manholes at the center of the Euclid Street/Chapman Avenue intersection and establishing a new connection point approximately 50 feet to the east along Chapman Avenue as well as reconstructing the double barrel siphon and adjusting invert elevations to achieve a suitable slope. The design utilized a trenchless method to install the siphon beneath the OCPW Brea Creek Channel. Additional tasks included adjusting manhole elevations and reconnected service laterals, constructing new curb and gutter where gutter is absent, constructing ADA compliant curb ramps, and repairing curb, gutter, cross gutters, sidewalks and driveways where required. The City utilized SB1 funds for the road rehabilitation and local funds for the sewer improvements. Keith Hoey, PE, Senior Civil Engineer | (562) 570-6586 | keith.hoey@longbeach.gov 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 5th Floor, Long Beach, CA. 90802 CiTywiDE ADA CURB R AMPS & PATh OF TRAVEL PEDESTRiAN ACCESSiBiLiT y IMPROVEMENT long Beach 2019to ongoing begin & end date $1.6 million ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe Alex Liu Kim Murillo Amy Flores Riley Moore OE is providing Design Engineering services to the City of Long Beach involving Citywide ADA Curb Ramps and Path of Travel Pedestrian Accessibility Improvements. The objective of the project is to design and construct at least 20,000 new ADA compliant curb ramps over the next 20 years in accordance with current State and Federal accessibility codes and standards. The project is to complete 1,000 of those ramps deemed most critical for accessibility. OE's team utilizes AutoCAD Civil 3D on 3D surfaces for the designs in compliance with the Long Beach Standard Plan No. 122 in order to satisfy the maximum allowable slopes dictated in the most current version of Caltrans Standard Plan A88A, and has had to consider other accessibility standards due to occasional unavailability of a suitable ramp case and type. The project work entails the preparation of detailed individual curb ramp construction plans with the inclusion of horizontal geometrics, design elevations and dimensions, and utility appurtenance adjustments and relocations, along with concrete infrastructure such as curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalk. The necessary reconstruction is incorporated in order to accommodate the new curb ramps, meet accessibility requirements, and maintain drainage. Additional design elements have also required consideration, which involve constructing 32”x54” size flat landings next to each pedestrian push-button at signalized intersections and installing guardrails where retaining curbs adjoin walkable hard surfaces. Due to the large volume of ramps reconstructed each year, small batches of design details and construction of the ramps are being provided to the City at regular intervals through out a continuous process, with City submittals made on a monthly basis at a scaled frequency and quality. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 13 Prem Kumar, City Engineer | (310) 802-5300 | pkumar@citymb.info 3621 Bell Avenue, Manhattan Beach, CA. 90266 MANhATTAN BEACh BOULEVARD AND SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD wiDENiNG manhattan Beach 2018to 2019 begin & end date $205,000 ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Ignacio Ochoa Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe OE provided Design Engineering services to the City of Manhattan Beach on the Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard Widening project. The proposed project limits include the intersection of Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard to accommodate dual left turn lanes in the northbound to westbound, eastbound to southbound, and westbound to northbound directions. The City of Lawndale is east of the project area, the City of Redondo Beach is south of the intersection, El Segundo sits to the north, and the Pacific Ocean to the west. Commercial businesses can be found throughout the project limits. The purpose of the project was to increase the operational capabilities of the intersection. This was accomplished by adding dual left turn lanes to the westbound, northbound and eastbound lanes. Northbound and southbound Sepulveda will have five travel lanes; two left turn lanes, and three through lanes. Eastbound and Westbound Manhattan Beach Boulevard will have five travel lanes; two left turn lanes, two through lanes and one dedicated right turn lane. Didar Khandker, PE, MSCE, Associate Civil Engineer | (310) 318-0661 x2456 didar.khandker@redondo.org | 415 Diamond Street, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 INGLEwOOD AVENUE AT MANhATTAN BEACh BOULEVARD STREET wiDENiNG redondo Beach 2018to 2019 begin & end date $288,000 ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Ignacio Ochoa Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe OE provided full Design Engineering services for the Inglewood Avenue at Manhattan Beach Boulevard Southbound Right-Hand Turn Lane Improvements Project. In addition to design engineering services, OE had assembled a team that completed environmental analyses and right-of-way appraisal and acquisition services. The proposed project limits included the intersection of Inglewood Avenue and Manhattan Beach Boulevard. The southbound lanes of Inglewood Avenue, north of Manhattan Beach Boulevard, consisted of one left turn lane, two through lanes, and a right turn lane which operate at LOS E in the AM and LOS F in the PM. The purpose of the project was to increase the operational capabilities of the intersection. This was accomplished by adding a dedicated right-turn lane on southbound Inglewood Avenue to increase to three lanes. Allison Tran, Associate Engineer | (949) 724-7547 | atran@cityofirvine.org 6427 Oak Canyon, Building 1, Irvine, CA 92618 SAND CANyON & PORTOLA PARkwAy IMPROVEMENTS irvine 2020 begin & end date $93,955 ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Ludy Smeets Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Alex Liu Kim Murillo OE is providing the City of Irvine with Design Engineering services for the Portola Parkway and Sand Canyon Avenue Street Rehabilitation Project. The project consists of rehabilitating approximately 4,500 linear feet of Portola Parkway and 9,300 linear feet of Sand Canyon Avenue, as well as rehabilitating the intersections of Sand Canyon Avenue & Laguna Canyon, Sand Canyon Avenue & Trabuco Road, and Sand Canyon Avenue & Irvine Boulevard. Additional design elements include reconstructing deficient curb ramps to meet ADA requirements. Alvin Papa, City Engineer | (562) 570-6386 | alvin.papa@longbeach.gov 333 W Ocean Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90802 SPRiNG STREET AT BELLFLOwER & LAkEwOOD BOULEVARD INTERSECTiON long Beach 2019to 2019 begin & end date $95,000 ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Ignacio Ochoa Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe OE provided the City of Long Beach with Design Engineering services. The first project is along Spring Street at Bellflower Boulevard and the other is along Spring Street at Lakewood Boulevard. The goal of the project was to implement congestion management and reduction strategies at these intersections to improve capacity and movement for future volumes. The project included design work for raised medians, traffic signal modifications, turn pocket extensions, utility relocation and utility adjustments. The existing conditions at the intersection of Spring Street and Bellflower Boulevard included a single left turn lane in each direction, three through lanes in each direction, and dedicated right turn pockets for all intersection legs except for the west leg. The intent at this intersection was to extend the left turn pockets for the north, east and south legs. The project also extended the southbound right turn pocket. The existing conditions at the intersection of Spring Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 14 Street and Lakewood Boulevard include Dual left turn pockets in all directions, three through lanes in all directions and dual right turn lanes from southbound Lakewood Boulevard to westbound Spring Street. The future capacity required an increase in pocket lengths for the left turn pockets in each direction on Spring Street along with an increased length of the dual right turn pockets on southbound Lakewood Boulevard. Freddy A. Bonilla, PE, Associate Civil Engineer (now in Victorville) | (760) 955-5158 fbonilla@victorvilleca.org | 14177 McArt Road, Victorville, CA 92392 DEL AMO BOULEVARD PROJECT cerritos 2018 begin & end date $70,000 ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Ludy Smeets Justin Smeets Dayton Lowe Alex Liu Kim Murillo Amy Flores OE provided Design Engineering services on the Del Amo Boulevard Project. Del Amo Boulevard is a major arterial oriented east/west and is used as a thoroughfare to adjacent cities. The project limits consist of a total of approximately 2,900 linear feet (approximately 0.55 miles) of Del Amo Boulevard between Pioneer Boulevard and Norwalk Boulevard. The project is limited to the north half of the street as the south half is under the City of Lakewood’s jurisdiction. The project requirements included rehabilitation of pavement, concrete removal and replacement of damaged curb, gutter and sidewalks, identifying and addressing storm water drainage concerns, retrofitting or reconstructing curb access ramps and driveways with the latest ADA standards, and updating signing, striping and traffic loops. Overgrown trees were present throughout the project limits and were significantly impacting roadway, sidewalk, and gutter conditions. Close collaboration with the selected landscape architect was necessary to ensure all issues regarding tree root infiltration were addressed to accommodate the civil and landscape designs and to ensure that the City received a cohesive package of civil, landscape, and irrigation plans. The plans included LID Improvements to divert urban run-off from the storm drain system. Noe Negrete, Director of Public Works & City Engineer | (562) 409-7540 x7611 noenegrete@santafesprings.org | 11710 E. Telegraph Road, Santa Fe Springs, CA. 90670 LOS NiETOS ROAD REhABiLiTATiON PROJECT santa fe springs 2020 begin & end date $90,000 ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Ludy Smeets Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe Kim Murillo Riley Moore OE is providing Design Engineering services to the City of Santa Fe Springs to rehabilitate approximately 2.3 miles of roadway on Los Nietos Road between Pioneer Blvd. and Painter Ave. The segment of Los Nietos was noted to be in poor condition. Widespread alligator cracking, block cracking, and potholing were observed throughout the project limits. The rehabilitation entailed available grind and overlay on the street segments and milling the full width of the street in areas where the deterioration was extensive. Our team also identified areas of isolated deterioration where digouts and milling the edges of the street may be necessary. Additional tasks include reconstructing curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalks in disrepair, as well as constructing ADA compliant driveways and curb ramps. Railroad right-of-ways intersect Los Nietos Road within the limits of the project. All design and construction activities within these right-of-way was coordinated with the PUC and carried out in accordance with the applicable PUC Codes. Noe Negrete, Director of Public Works & City Engineer | (562) 409-7540 x7611 noenegrete@santafesprings.org | 11710 E. Telegraph Road, Santa Fe Springs, CA. 90670 GREENSTONE AVENUE PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTiON PROJECT santa fe springs 2017to 2019 begin & end date $25,000 ContraCt value tHe Cit y of project teamMajdi Ataya Ludy Smeets Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe Kim Murillo Riley Moore OE provided Design Engineering services for the City of Santa Fe Springs. The project limits were Lakeland Avenue to Sunshine Ave and Sunshine Avenue from Greenstone to Shoemaker Avenue. The surrounding business included heavy commercial and industrial with mostly large truck traffic. The existing roadway was severely distressed asphalt that had alligator cracking throughout the roadway. OE worked with the City and came up with an alternative approach to give this roadway extended life. The method of reconstruction used was Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC). It uses a machine similar to an asphalt paving machine in order to place a low slump concrete that is then compacted with a roller. This method drastically reduced the cure time of traditional concrete down to hours instead of days, limiting negative impact to the surrounding businesses. This method also lowers the downtime for residents and businesses. As a result, because it uses paving machines, it can be completed quickly and at a much lower cost per square foot. The scope of work included 317,500 square feet of pavement reconstruction, 1,270 lineal feet of curb reconstruction, 2,700 square feet of sidewalk reconstruction, 1,510 square feet of cross gutter reconstruction, 6,800 square feet of driveway reconstruction and 26 manhole adjustments along with various other items of work. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 15 FEDERAL FUNDiNG & STATE CALTRANS ExPERiENCE OE has provided Design• and Construction and Inspection• support services on several Federally Funded projects, including ARRA, FHWA, and CDBG projects, and projects requiring Caltrans coordination. We know the District 7 Caltrans office and we guarantee Caltrans LAPM compliance on any project. CDBG FUNDED City of LAkE FOREST: 1. ADA Access Ramp Improvements, Phase 7• | 2. ADA Access Ramp Improvement Project, Phase II• City of COMMERCE: 1. Rosini & Rosewood Rehabilitation Project, Phase 1•• | 2. Bristow Park Neighborhood Rehabilitation•• City of TORRANCE: 1. City-Wide Bus Stop Accessibility Improvements• | 2. Sidewalk Repair Handicap Accessibility, I-135• City of PLACENTiA: 1. Sidewalk/Pedestrian Accessibility, Phase II•• | 2. ADA Accessible Ramps Project, Phase III•• City of hAwAiiAN GARDENS: Residential Rehabilitation Project•• City of REDONDO BEACh: Citywide Curb Ramp Improvements, Phase III•• City of COSTA MESA: Bay St. & Ford Rd. Alley Reconstruction• City of LA hABRA: 4 Segment Alley Pavement Rehabilitation, Phases I & II• City of SOUTh EL MONTE: Street Slurry and Improvements Project• City of hESPERiA: FY 18-19 Residential Street Rehabilitation, CO #7150• ATP FUNDED City of ChINO hILLS: Los Serranos Widening & Sidewalk Improvement• SB1 FUNDED City of ALhAMBRA: FY 17-18 Street Rehabilitation Project• City of FULLERTON: Euclid Roadway & Sewer Reconstruction Project• ARhP FUNDED City of LA hABRA: La Habra Blvd. Rehabilitation Project• hSiP FUNDED City of PiCO RiVERA: Telegraph Rd. Beautification & Rehabilitation• City of COSTA MESA: Placentia Ave. Median Installation & Landscaping• also County of ORANGE: Santiago Canyon Road Project• City of BELLFLOwER: Bellflower Blvd. Complete Streets Project• FTA FUNDED City of NORwALk: Bus Shelter Replacement Project•• City of SAN BERNARDiNO: 1. “E” Street Rehabilitation• | 2. Citywide Street Rehabilitation• City of iRViNE: Yale Avenue Rehabilitation• also City Of LA hABRA hEIGhTS: Los Palomas Dr. Reconstruction•• City of COMMERCE: Citywide Bus Shelter Replacement Project• City of CERRiTOS: Studebaker Rd. Street Improvements• also ARRA FUNDED City of SANTA MONiCA: Lincoln Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation •• City of LA hABRA hEiGhTS: Hacienda Rd. & East Rd. Stimulus Project••also City of LyNwOOD: 1. Otis St. Improvements Project• | 2. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Rehabilitation• City of LA MiRADA: Adelfa, Foster, Marquadt Rehabilitation Projects• also City of iRViNE: Red Hill Ave. Pavement Rehabilitation Project• also City of NORwALk: 1. Bus Shelter Replacement Project •• | 2. Studebaker Rd. & Firestone Blvd. Rehabilitation Project• also F h wA FUNDED City Of LA hABRA hEIGhTS: 1. Hacienda Rd. & Fullerton Rd. Realignment•• | 2. Road Improvements & Slope Stabilization•• STPL FUNDED City of BELLFLOwER: 1.Bellflower Blvd. & Woodruff Ave. Rehabilitation• also | 2.Woodruff Ave. & Palo Verdes Ave. Rehabilitation• also City of DiAMOND BAR: Chino Hills Pkwy. & Chino Ave. Street Rehabilitation• City of PiCO RiVERA: Rosemead Blvd. Rehabilitation Project• also City of REDONDO BEACh: Aviation Blvd. Rehabilitation Project•• also City of DOwNEy: Gardendale St. Pavement Rehabilitation Project• CALTRANS COORDiNATiON City of BREA: 1. Rails to Trails Project• | 2. Berry St. & Imperial Hwy. Sewer Main Replacement • City of DiAMOND BAR: 1. 7yr. Annual Residential Rehabilitaiton•• | 2. Area 2 Residential Arterial Zone 1 Rehabilitation•• City of NORwALk: 1. Shoemaker Ave. Rehabilitation & Drainage• | 2. Studebaker Rd. & Firestone Blvd. Rehabilitaiton• City of COSTA MESA: 1. Newport Blvd. Widening Improvement Project• | 2. Harbor Blvd. & Gisler Ave. Intersection Improvement• City of SANTA FE SPRiNGS: 1. I-5 at Florence Ave. Widening Project• | 2. I-5 Fwy. Water Main Relocation• County of ORANGE: Edinger Ave. Bridge Widening Project• City of LyNwOOD: Imperial Highway Rehabilitation Project• City of LA hABRA: La Habra Blvd. Rehabilitation Project• City of iRViNE: Campus Drive Bikeway Construction Project• City of SOUTh GATE: Atlantic Ave. & Firestone Blvd. Intersection Widening• City of BELLFLOwER: Flower St. Rehabilitation Project• City of DOwNEy: Staff Augmentation & Program Management Services• 3 PRIMARy APPROAChES 1 Our cost control methods that include planning and executing the objectives of the schedule by continually monitoring project cost, quantities, estimation and performance during construction. 2 Emphasis on safety, quality, & maintaining open lines of communication with the City staff and the public. 3Developed knowledge and experience through a history of coordinating with both Caltrans & Federal Funding departments. CALTRANS COORDINATION 1 Submit Requests for Authorization (RFA's) for Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, Utility & Construction. 2 Preparation and submitting of the Award & Expenditures Report. 3Assist in preparing Federal & State invoices. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 16 NIGUEL ROAD STREET REHABILITATION Raised Center Median, Centerline Striping, Bike Lanes, Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, ADA Ramps Majdi Ataya QA/QC Manager Justin Smeets Project Manager Ryan Dennis Project Engineer Alexander Liu Project Engineer Kimilee Murillo Project Engineer Riley Moore Project Engineer Amy Flores Project Engineerprem Kum a r City En g i n e er(310) 802-5300 pkumar@citymb.info 3621 Bell Avenue Manhattan Beach, CA. 90266 jac K i sco t t Di r . P u blic Wo r k s & Analystjscott@cityoflagunaniguel.org (949) 362-4337 30111 Crown Valley Pkwy. Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 CITYWIDE ADA CURB RAMPS & PATH OF TRAVEL PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENT ADA Ramps, Curb & Gutter, Sidewalks, Driveways Majdi Ataya QA/QC Manager Justin Smeets Project Manager Ryan Dennis Project Engineer Alexander Liu Project Engineer Kimilee Murillo Project Engineer Riley Moore Project Engineer Amy Flores Project Engineer MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD. & SEPULVEDA BLVD. WIDENING Intersections, Street Widening, Dual Lanes, Left, Travel and Through Lanes, Dedicated Right Turn Lane Majdi Ataya QA/QC Manager Justin Smeets Project Manager Ignacio Ochoa Project Manager Ryan Dennis Project Engineer Dayton Lowe Project Engineer Keit h h oeY, p e Se nior Civi l E n g ineer(562) 570-6586 keith.hoey@longbeach.gov 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 5th Floor, Long Beach, CA. 90802 REFERENCES Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 17 QUALIFICATIONS 39 Years Of Experience BS CiViL ENGiNEERiNG CSULB, 1981 MPA FULL COURSEwORk CSULB, 1993 PE #39392 Registered Civil Engineer former DEPuTY DiRECTOR & CiTY ENgiNEER for the City of La Habra FiELDS OF ExPERTiSE ROADWAY WATER DRAINAGE ADA RAMPS SEWER PARK BEAUTIFICATION BIKE LANES & TRAILS majdI ataYa , PE qa/qc manager BACkGROUND Majdi is the Principal-In-Charge of Ownard Engineering. Majdi Ataya, Professional Engineer and Former Deputy Director and City Engineer for the City of La Habra’s Public Works Department, is a seasoned engineer with over 39 years of solid and diversified experience in the public works sector. He is extremely familiar with the process of project management and design. He is a highly effective communicator and manager with an outstanding assimilation ability. Majdi is able to adapt and relate to all levels of management, and retain high energy levels and enthusiasm for the project at hand. Majdi understands the importance of excellent communication with public agencies and will be a dependable extension of your staff. ExPERIENCE EUCLID ROADwAy & SEwER RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT The City of fullerton Majdi was the QA/QC Manager to the City of Fullerton on the Euclid Roadway and Sewer Reconstruction from Williamson to Fern Project. The project consisted of reconstructing or resurfacing approximately 3,700 linear feet of arterial streets between Fern Drive and Williamson Avenue and replacing approximately 1,700 feet of sewer mains between Malvern Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue. The sewer work included removing the existing 10-inch VCP and replacing it with new 12-inch VCP pipe between Commonwealth and Malvern and removing and replacing sewer north of Malvern to the end of the street project limits at Fern without upsizing. The work also included removing the manholes at the center of the Euclid Street/Chapman Avenue intersection and establishing a new connection point approximately 50 feet to the east along Chapman Avenue as well as reconstructing the double barrel siphon and adjusting invert elevations to achieve a suitable slope. The design utilized a trenchless method to install the siphon beneath the OCPW Brea Creek Channel. Additional tasks included adjusting manhole elevations and reconnected service laterals, constructing new curb and gutter where gutter is absent, constructing ADA compliant curb ramps, and repairing curb, gutter, cross gutters, sidewalks and driveways where required. The City utilized SB1 funds for the road rehabilitation and local funds for the sewer improvements. CITywIDE ADA CURB RAMPS/PATh OF TRAVEL PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITy IMPROVEMENT The City of long Beach Majdi served as the QA/QC Manager to the City of Long Beach. The objective of the project is to design and construct at least 20,000 new ADA compliant curb ramps over the next 20 years in accordance with current State and Federal accessibility codes and standards. The project is to complete 1,000 of those ramps deemed most critical for accessibility. OE’s team utilizes AutoCAD Civil 3D on 3D surfaces for the designs in compliance with the Long Beach Standard Plan No. 122 in order to satisfy the maximum allowable slopes dictated in the most current version of Caltrans Standard Plan A88A, and has Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 18 had to consider other accessibility standards due to occasional unavailability of a suitable ramp case and type. The project work entails the preparation of detailed individual curb ramp construction plans with the inclusion of horizontal geometrics, design elevations and dimensions, and utility appurtenance adjustments and relocations, along with concrete infrastructure such as curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalk. The necessary reconstruction is incorporated in order to accommodate the new curb ramps, meet accessibility requirements, and maintain drainage. Additional design elements have also required consideration, which involve constructing 32”x54” size flat landings next to each pedestrian push-button at signalized intersections and installing guardrails where retaining curbs adjoin walkable hard surfaces. Due to the large volume of ramps reconstructed each year, small batches of design details and construction of the ramps are being provided to the City at regular intervals through out a continuous process, with City submittals made on a monthly basis at a scaled frequency and quality. hSIP-BELLFLOwER BOULEVARD COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT The City of BELLFLOwER Majdi is the QA/QC Manager for the City of Bellflower. The project consists of enhancing approximately 2,200 linear feet (0.42 miles) of Bellflower Boulevard from Artesia Boulevard to the South City Limit, approximately 330 feet south of Rose Street. Bellflower Boulevard is an arterial street with two lanes of traffic and curbside parking in both directions, a dual left turn lane, and traffic signals at high volume intersections. The project was partially funded by Cycle 9 of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The project has an estimated cost of $1,162,100. The street enhancements included adding Class III Bike Lanes, reducing the lane widths, adding raised medians with landscaping and irrigation, upgrading and adding high visibility crosswalks, rapid flashing beacons, and pedestrian countdown heads at the intersections, bulb-outs, and road resurfacing. NIGUEL ROAD STREET REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of laguna niguel Majdi is the QA/QC Manager for the City of Laguna Niguel to rehabilitate an approximately 1.93 mile (10,200-foot) section of Niguel Road that extends from Alta Tera to Marina Hills Drive. Niguel Road from Highland Avenue to Marina Hills Drive (8,450 linear feet) is an arterial street with two lanes of traffic in either direction, raised center medians or centerline striping, left and right-turn pockets, and bike lanes. Niguel Road from Alta Terra to Highland Avenue is a residential collector street (1,750-feet) with one lane of traffic in both directions. Parking is prohibited on the street except on the north side of Niguel Road from Alta Terra to Galina Way. Additional tasks included repairing curb, gutter, and sidewalk and constructing ADA compliant access ramps where required. yALE AVENUE REhABILITATION The City of irvine Majdi was the QA/QC Manager to the City of Irvine on the Yale Avenue Rehabilitation project on Yale Avenue from Deerfield Avenue to the I-5 Overpass. Yale Avenue serves as a major Northeast Southwest arterial for the City of Irvine. This segment of Yale Avenue varies between a 2-lane arterial with bike lanes to a 4-lane arterial with bike lanes and raised medians. The limits of this project were entirely within residential neighborhoods with Heritage Park and a fire station located at the northwest corner of Yale Avenue and Walnut Avenue. The first segment from Deerfield Avenue to approximately Edgmere Avenue entailed a 2” mill and a 2” Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt Type G (RHMA-G) overlay with some full depth structural sections where the street is severely deteriorated. The second segment of roadway from Edgmere Avenue to the I-5 Overpass required a 6” mill and placement of 2.5” of RHMA-G over 4” Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) in the street with a 2” to 2½” transitional grind at the bike lanes. This project also corrected ADA deficiencies for sidewalks and ramps. Our design team checked for existing roadway signs and striping for compliance with both the City standards as well as the 3R federal design requirements. Another important aspect of this project was its proximity to Caltrans right-of-way. Traffic control through the I-5 bridge overcrossing required obtaining a Caltrans Encroachment Permit. LOS NIETOS ROAD REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of santa fe springsMajdi was the QA/QC Manager to the City of Santa Fe Springs. The project consists of rehabilitating approximately 2.3 miles of roadway on Los Nietos Road between Pioneer Blvd. and Painter Ave. which was in poor condition. Widespread alligator cracking, block cracking, and potholing were observed throughout the project limits. The rehabilitation entailed available grind and overlay on the street segments and milling the full width of the street in areas where the deterioration was extensive. Our team also identified areas of isolated deterioration where digouts and milling the edges of the street may be necessary. Additional tasks include reconstructing curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalks in disrepair, as well as constructing ADA compliant driveways and curb ramps. Railroad right-of-ways intersect Los Nietos Rd. within the project limits. All design and construction activities was coordinated with the PUC and carried out in accordance with the applicable PUC Codes. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 19 QUALIFICATIONS 16 Years Of Experience BS CiViL ENGiNEERiNG CSUF, 2007 PE #78314 Registered Civil Engineer PLS #9293 Professional Land Surveyor QSD/QSP #00852 Qualified SWPPP Developer OCTA PAVEMENT REhABiLiTATiON (prior) Certification FiELDS OF ExPERTiSE ROADWAY WATER DRAINAGE ADA RAMP SEWER PARK WIDENING BIKE LANE justin smeets, PE, PLS, QSD P r OJ e c T manager BACkGROUND Justin holds 16 years of diverse experience encompassing Civil Engineering design, Municipal Engineering and Facilities design, Construction Management, and Construction Administration. Using AutoCAD Civil 3D, Justin manages and developes engineering plans, specifications and mapping, executes land development and grading design projects, conducts earthwork calculations, and incorporates industry standard designs. In his extended proficiency with federally funded regulations and his familiarity with the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM), Justin has successfully taken multiple audited federally funded construction projects from the initial federal funding application, to the Preliminary Environmental Study, to the E-76 approval, through to construction completion. With his management experience on construction projects, Justin plans and coordinates kickoff meetings with the Contractor, reviews project submittals, RFIs, and CCOs, checks and compares Contractor invoices against field quantities, and coordinates daily construction details with the Contractor and Inspector. In being a Qualified SWPPP Developer, Justin has completed multiple SWPPPs, erosion and sediment control plans per the latest Construction General Permit. With his long list of accomplishments, Justin is continuously increasing his skills in modern design software, and his knowledge of industry design and management standards. EXPERIENCE MANhATTAN BEACh BLVD./SEPULVEDA BLVD. wIDENING The City of manhattan Beach Justin was the Project Manager to the City of Manhattan Beach on the Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard Widening project. The proposed project limits include the intersection of Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard to accommodate dual left turn lanes in the northbound to westbound, eastbound to southbound, and westbound to northbound directions. The City of Lawndale is east of the project area, the City of Redondo Beach is south of the intersection, El Segundo sits to the north, and the Pacific Ocean to the west. Commercial businesses can be found throughout the project limits. The purpose of the project was to increase the operational capabilities of the intersection. This was accomplished by adding dual left turn lanes to the westbound, northbound and eastbound lanes. Northbound and southbound Sepulveda will have five travel lanes; two left turn lanes, and three through lanes. Eastbound and Westbound Manhattan Beach Boulevard will have five travel lanes; two left turn lanes, two through lanes and one dedicated right turn lane. CITywIDE ADA CURB RAMPS/PATh OF TRAVEL PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITy IMPROVEMENT The City of long Beach Justin is providing Project Management services to the City of Long Beach involving Citywide ADA Curb Ramps and Path of Travel Pedestrian Accessibility Improvements. The objective of the project is to design Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 20 and construct at least 20,000 new ADA compliant curb ramps over the next 20 years in accordance with current State and Federal accessibility codes and standards. The project is to complete 1,000 of those ramps deemed most critical for accessibility. OE’s team utilizes AutoCAD Civil 3D on 3D surfaces for the designs in compliance with the Long Beach Standard Plan No. 122 in order to satisfy the maximum allowable slopes dictated in the most current version of Caltrans Standard Plan A88A, and has had to consider other accessibility standards due to occasional unavailability of a suitable ramp case and type. The project work entails the preparation of detailed individual curb ramp construction plans with the inclusion of horizontal geometrics, design elevations and dimensions, and utility appurtenance adjustments and relocations, along with concrete infrastructure such as curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalk. The necessary reconstruction is incorporated in order to accommodate the new curb ramps, meet accessibility requirements, and maintain drainage. Additional design elements have also required consideration, which involve constructing 32”x54” size flat landings next to each pedestrian push-button at signalized intersections and installing guardrails where retaining curbs adjoin walkable hard surfaces. Due to the large volume of ramps reconstructed each year, small batches of design details and construction of the ramps are being provided to the City at regular intervals through out a continuous process, with City submittals made on a monthly basis at a scaled frequency and quality. BELLFLOwER BOULEVARD PAVEMENT REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of BellfloWer Justin was the Project Manager on the Bellflower Boulevard Rehabilitation Project for the City of Bellflower. The project scope included approximately 0.5 miles of roadway and median improvements on Bellflower Blvd. between Somerset Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue Bellflower Boulevard is a major thoroughfare in the City of Bellflower. The project called for preparing street improvement plans, striping and signing plans, traffic control plans, as well as construction specifications and the engineer’s estimate. The design phase included designated stretches of full-depth reconstruction combined with a grind and overlay of the entire roadway. Furthermore, the scope entailed the removal and replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, pedestrian push buttons, and replacement of access ramps in compliance with ADA regulations. The design required extensive coordination with utility companies and stakeholders in order to ensure full approval and compliance of all proposed improvements. The city required the submission of draft plans to utility agencies to ensure conflicts were not encountered during the design. All conflicts or needed adjustments were specified on the plans to ensure a successful construction phase. 7-yEAR ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of diamond Bar Justin provided Project Management services to the City of Diamond Bar on their annual arterial and residential roadway maintenance projects for an annual period of 7 years. Years 2010 and 2011 were awarded as separate contracts. The City awarded OE an additional 3-year contract for 2012–2014. In 2015, the City of Diamond Bar awarded OE yet another annual rehabilitation project. The project sizes and costs were: 2010: 11.8 miles of arterial & residential streets ($908 K), 2011: 19 miles of arterial & residential streets ($1.8 M), 2012: 10 miles of arterial & residential streets ($1.1 M), 2013: 13 miles of arterial & residential streets ($1.3 M), 2014: 14.5 miles of residential, arterial & collector streets ($1.8 M), 2015: 14 miles of residential, arterial & collector streets ($1.75 M) and 2016/2017: 16.6 miles of residential and collector streets ($1.58 million). The general scope of work for each year’s project included localized R&R patching, grind and overlay, cape and slurry seal, traffic loops, traffic striping, and required heavy traffic phasing and traffic control review. OE assisted the City through the project bidding phase, developing text and stipulations for the bid package to ensure contractor availability during the desired working months. Due to the proximity to freeways, OE also coordinated with Caltrans to obtain encroachment permits for the City for four of the projects, which was essential. INGLEwOOD AVENUE AT MANhATTAN BEACh BLVD STREET wIDENING PROJECT The City of redondo Beach Justin was the Project Manager for the Inglewood Avenue at Manhattan Beach Boulevard Southbound Right- Hand Turn Lane Improvements Project. In addition to design engineering services, OE had assembled a team that completed environmental analyses and right-of-way appraisal and acquisition services. The proposed project limits included the intersection of Inglewood Avenue and Manhattan Beach Boulevard. The southbound lanes of Inglewood Avenue, north of Manhattan Beach Boulevard, consisted of one left turn lane, two through lanes, and a right turn lane which operate at LOS E in the AM and LOS F in the PM. The purpose of the project was to increase the operational capabilities of the intersection. This was accomplished by adding a dedicated right-turn lane on southbound Inglewood Avenue to increase the through traffic to three lanes. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 21 QUALIFICATIONS 38 Years Of Experience BS CiViL ENGiNEERiNG, 1979 California State University, Long Beach MA MILITARy SCIENCE, 1990 Agricultural & Mechanics University US ARMy, 1989 Command & General Staff College PE #37221 Registered Civil Engineer APwA MEMBERAmerican Public Works Association ASCE MEMBERAmerican Society of Civil Engineers NSPE MEMBERNational Society Professional Engineers SAME MEMBERSociety of American Military Engineers FiELDS OF ExPERTiSE ROADWAY DRAINAGE SEWER WATER ADA RAMP PAVEMENT ludWig “ludY” s meets, PE Pr OJ e c T m anager BACkGROUND Ludy has over 38 years of civil engineering experience with focus on Project Management, as well as Construction Management. He also has experience in the design of civil engineering projects such as street, sewer, water, and storm drain projects. Ludy has management level experience working in public works departments in cities throughout Southern California. His experience includes public agency budgeting, project implementation, project design, PS&E development, contract bidding, award administration, construction management and project closure reporting. He has selected, directed and managed consultants, architects and engineers as required in order to meet public works department goals and objectives. He has supervised and trained city staff junior engineers. His many responsibilities included providing project management for federally funded projects, and state funded projects. ExPERiENCE OCEAN AVENUE AT BLUFFS STAIRCASE PROJECT The City of long Beach As the Project Manager for this CIP Ocean Boulevard at Bluffs Staircase Project in the City of Long Beach, Ludy provided plans and specifications and project construction oversight to reconstruct 6 major beach accessible pedestrian staircases. This included an approximated 50 feet to over 230 feet long bike transferable pedestrian access way, from Ocean Avenue to the beach below. Challenges included finding a way to include a bike ramp capable of accommodating all types of bikes, along with the use of paints and treatments to the staircases in a way as to discourage graffiti applications by taggers. BALL RD. AND SUNkIST ST. INTERSECTION & ROADwAy IMPROVEMENTS The City of anaheim Ludy provided Project Management services to the City of Anaheim to widen and construct improvements along the roadway in this City intersection located at Ball Road and Sunkist Street. The goal was to enhance the intersection for traffic ability through this intersection and improve access to and from the 57 freeway. This project included additional right-of-way acquisition and roadway dedication, curb realignment, pavement analysis, reconstruction, and private property on-site improvements. ORANGE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT The City of long Beach Ludy provided Design Engineering services on this Orange Avenue Street Capital Improvement Project (CIP) for the City of Long Beach. The project included the design to widen and provide pavement reconstruction of 5,400 lineal feet of roadway. Several options of improvements were provided. One option was to demolish the entire PCC pavement and replace with an asphalt over an aggregate base Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 22 over subgrade. The second option was to merely crack seal the existing PCC and add a 2.5-inch AC overlay. The third option was to crack seal the number one lane in each direction, and then grind and pave the number two and parking lane to the edge of gutter entirely throughout this nearly one-mile street segment. The third option was constructed. ARTESIA BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS The City of long Beach Ludy provided Design Management to repave, rehabilitate, and direct street reconstruction as needed throughout this arterial street segment of nearly 5,800 linear feet of Artesia Boulevard in the City of Long Beach. The roadway was both rehabilitated and reconstructed throughout this segment and included 5 major intersections. Traffic and accessibility to the adjacent businesses was a significant project challenge. BOLSA ChICA STREET ENhANCEMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS The City of Westminster As the Project Manager, Ludy provided design plans and specifications for this 6,800 lineal feet street widening and landscaped median island construction project in the City of Westminster. This project provided for a raised, fully landscaped median island, provided drainage solutions, street pavement improvements and reconstruction, as well as restriping of the intersections to accommodate additional turning pockets and free-moving right turns. CULVER DRIVE & wALNUT AVENUE INTERSECTION STUDy The City of irvine Ludy provided Project Management services for the City of Irvine to coordinate the preliminary design and project report for the proposed addition of a northbound lane on Culver Drive and an eastbound lane on Walnut Avenue. The purpose of the project was to increase the intersection capacity and reduce congestion in the area. Construction was estimated to be at $3.3 million. Important elements in determining the design concepts included right-of-way acquisition, environmental study and impact report, the relocation of existing landscaping and traffic analysis. NEwPORT BOULEVARD wIDENING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT The City of costa mesa Ludy provided Project Management services on the Newport Boulevard Widening Improvements Project for the City of Costa Mesa. The project consists of widening a portion 77 Fair Drive of southbound Newport Boulevard to accommodate a fourth through lane and improve its Level of Service from the current "F" rating (ranging from 1.10 to 1.30). The section of roadway to be enhanced extends approximately 2,700 linear feet southwest from 19th Street to the Superior Avenue turn-off located northeast of 17th Street. The project is located within Caltrans jurisdiction and requires traffic signal modifications, utility and street light relocations, and right-of way acquisitions to accommodate the additional through lane and right-turn pockets. EUCLID ROADwAy & SEwER RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT The City of fullerton Ludy provided Project Management services to the City of Fullerton on the Euclid Roadway and Sewer Reconstruction from Williamson to Fern Project. The project consisted of reconstructing or resurfacing approximately 3,700 linear feet of arterial streets between Fern Drive and Williamson Avenue and replacing approximately 1,700 feet of sewer mains between Malvern Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue. The sewer work included removing the existing 10-inch VCP and replacing it with new 12-inch VCP pipe between Commonwealth and Malvern and removing and replacing sewer north of Malvern to the end of the street project limits at Fern without upsizing. The worked also included removing the manholes at the center of the Euclid Street/Chapman Avenue intersection and establishing a new connection point approximately 50 feet to the east along Chapman Avenue as well as reconstructing the double barrel siphon and adjusting invert elevations to achieve a suitable slope. The design utilized a trenchless method to install the siphon beneath the OCPW Brea Creek Channel. Additional tasks included adjusting manhole elevations and reconnected service laterals, constructing new curb and gutter where gutter is absent, constructing ADA compliant curb ramps, and repairing curb, gutter, cross gutters, sidewalks and driveways where required. The City utilized SB1 funds for the road rehabilitation and local funds for the sewer improvements. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 23 QUALIFICATIONS 36 Years Of Experience BS: CIVIL ENGINEERING CSUF, Fullerton, 1980 PE #35217 Registered Civil Engineer TE #1183 Registered Traffic Engineer PTOE Traffic Operations Engineer FiELDS OF ExPERTiSE ROADWAY TRAFFIC DRAINAGE ADA RAMP PAVEMENT BRIDGE PARK SEWER ignacio ochoa , PE, TE , PTOE Pr OJ e c T manager BACkGROUND Ignacio Ochoa has amassed 36 years of experience in the public works sector, starting his career off in the County of Orange as a Junior Civil Engineer. In 2007, he was appointed as County Chief Engineer and Director of the Orange County Engineering Division, and in 2012 he was chosen as Interim Public Works Director and continued to serve in both roles. During his time as the Director of Orange County Engineering/Interim Public Works Director, Ignacio managed a staff of over 1,000 employees and oversaw the design, construction, and maintenance of roads and regional flood control facilities in the County of Orange. He was responsible for an annual budget of approximately $600 million. Furthermore, he directed the County of Orange’s Flood Control Division, Inspection, Operations & Maintenance, Road, Survey, PM, and Watersheds. ExPERIENCE CITy TRAFFIC ENGINEER The City of long Beach Ignacio was the interim City Traffic Engineer in the City of Long Beach. He oversaw the Design and Construction section which is responsible for monitoring the timing of approximately 550 traffic signals citywide; preparing and reviewing design plans for roadway striping, traffic signal installations and upgrades and speed humps; and reviewing traffic control requirements for utility work. Ignacio worked closely with the Traffic Operations Division which is responsible for keeping the city’s 550 traffic signals operating 24 hours a day and the maintenance of nearly 3,600 parking meters. This division provides traffic signal maintenance and parking meter maintenance and collection support to the entire city (Belmont Shore and all the Marine Bureau area parking lots included) and the City of Seal Beach. Finally, as the City Traffic Engineer, he coordinated with the Transportation Programs Division. The Division also administers the annual Rideshare Survey required by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, to promote ridesharing and carpooling to reduce emissions in the city in particular and the Los Angeles basin in general. MANhATTAN BEACh & SEPULVEDA BLVD. wIDENING The City of manhattan Beach Ignacio was the Project Manager to the City of Manhattan Beach on the Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard Widening project. The proposed project limits include the intersection of Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard to accommodate dual left turn lanes in the northbound to westbound, eastbound to southbound, and westbound to northbound directions. The City of Lawndale is east of the project area, the City of Redondo Beach is south of the intersection, El Segundo sits to the north, and the Pacific Ocean to the west. Commercial businesses can be found throughout the project limits. The purpose of the project was to increase the Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 24 operational capabilities of the intersection. This was accomplished by adding dual left turn lanes to the westbound, northbound and eastbound lanes. Northbound and southbound Sepulveda will have five travel lanes; two left turn lanes, and three through lanes. Eastbound and Westbound Manhattan Beach Boulevard will have five travel lanes; two left turn lanes, two through lanes and one dedicated right turn lane. CITy ENGINEER SERVICES The City of West covina Ignacio was the City Engineer to the City of West Covina on an interim basis. Duties included planning, organizing, directing and coordinating the various engineering functions of the City, including design, construction, and maintenance of public works; reviewing work in progress and approving final designs, specifications, estimates, and contract documents for street, sewer, storm drain, bridge, and other projects; providing direction for the Building and Maintenance divisions; approving a variety of policy and procedure changes and revisions; participating in special projects of department; reviewing actions and effectiveness of the respective divisions; directing the preparation and maintenance of records; field notes, reports, maps, plots, deeds, benchmarks, monuments, and similar engineering information and record; directing the review and approval of final subdivision maps and improvement plans; confer with subdividers, contractors, and engineers on matters relating to subdivisions and public works design and construction; providing engineering information and advice; reviewing and approving the work of engineering consultants engaged by the City; preparing and administering the annual budget for the Public Works Department; and establishing and administering programs for the continued development of the staff. 1 million gallons per day, and the bridge deck was picked up on one end to adjust cross-fall. INGLEwOOD AVENUE AT MANhATTAN BEACh BOULEVARD wIDENING The City of redondo Beach Ignacio was the QA/QC Manager for the City of Redondo Beach. In addition to design engineering services, OE has assembled a team that can complete environmental analyses, environmental, and right-of-way appraisal and acquisition services. The proposed project limits included the intersection of Inglewood Avenue and Manhattan Beach Boulevard. The southbound lanes of Inglewood Avenue, north of Manhattan Beach Boulevard, consisted of one left turn lane, two through lanes, and a right turn lane which operate at LOS E in the AM and LOS F in the PM. The purpose of the project was to increase the operational capabilities of the intersection. This was accomplished by adding a dedicated right-turn lane on southbound Inglewood Avenue to increase the through traffic to three lanes. ANTONIO PARkwAy & LA PATA AVENUE wIDENING PROJECT The County of orange Ignacio provided Construction Management supervision through the completion of the high-profile Antonio Parkway and La Pata Avenue Widening project. The $25 million project spanned 1.5 miles, from Ladera Ranch to 1,000 feet south of Ortega Highway, and included 900 LF of bridgework across San Juan Creek. Antonio Parkway was widened from four to six lanes—40 feet to accommodate the two additional lanes of traffic and a sidewalk on each side. Bridgework included parkway improvements, a raised median, channel bank revetment at the south abutment, compaction grouting, and structural testing. The widening of the bridge and roadway occurred simultaneously and included grading and cement-treated soil, 3,691 LF of RCP storm drain, riprap for environmentally friendly drainage filtering, dry utility installations, 4,993 PVC pipe, utility conduits, four fire hydrants, traffic signal improvements and loops, signing and striping, video detection, and a Class I designated bike lane with special bicycle signal loops. The construction also included 448 LF of CIDH pile retaining wall with 42,000 pounds of steel reinforcement. Furthermore, the project required the installation of domestic, reclaimed, and non-potable waterlines as well as sewer installation and mainline trunk rerouting. The scope also included a dewatering and effluent treatment system onsite that handled 1 million gallons per day, and the bridge deck was picked up on one end to adjust cross-fall. VARIOUS INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS & PLANNING The County of orange Ignacio coordinated, supervised and directed all work in the County’s Road Division. He was the County’s spokesperson in coordinating a broad range of Public Works issues with cities, state offices, Board of Supervisors, local officials, community and neighborhood associations, the media and the general public. Furthermore, he represented the County in various technical and professional groups such as OCTA, Caltrans, Orange County Building Industry, and the TCA. Ignacio oversaw the activities of the Orange County Traffic Committee and represented the County as an expert witness on road-related claims/litigation, and worked with other divisions and departments to implement respective goals and policies pursuant to the Business Plan. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 25 QUALIFICATIONS 40 Years Of Experience BS: CIVIL ENGINEERING CSU Polytechnic, Pomona, 1979 MA: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION CSU, Fullerton PE #34820 Registered Civil Engineer PAST PRESiDENT City Engineer’s Association of Orange OCTA ChAiRMAN Technical Steering Committee & TAC FiELDS OF ExPERTiSE ROADWAY TRAFFIC DRAINAGE ADA RAMP PAVEMENT BRIDGE PARK SEWER donald hoppe, PE PrOJecT manager BACkGROUND Donald is a highly motivated and goal-oriented professional with demonstrated experience in project management, organizational management, conflict resolution, team development, critical thinking, analysis, and budgeting extensively for the public works industry, with a record of achieving outstanding results. Donald credits his record of meeting all goals and objectives with the ability to manage multiple projects and meet deadlines to his highly organized approach and an extremely strong work ethic. This, combined with a total commitment to excellence in all facets of job assignment, enables him to operate as an effective team player, working effectively with the City council, City manager, executive directors, technical personnel, skilled and non-skilled employees, the public, and outside public agencies. These excellent communication and presentation skills, along with his aquired skills acumen, brings a trusted and effective project manager to the table. ExPERIENCE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING - CIP PROJECTS The City of fullerton Donald was responsible for providing all Capital Improvement Program projects for the City of Fullerton and the City’s former Redevelopment Agency, performed through an 8 year period. Along with an in-house staff of 40, Donald was involved in various fields of discipline, including public works design for all adopted CIP projects, construction management, water system design, NPDES compliance and monitoring, private development, public right of way interface, traffic engineering and traffic signal operations. In addition, Donald handled the City of Fullerton’s departmental coordination with the Engineering Director and the airport manager for Fullerton’s last remaining General Aviation Airport in Orange County. Donald’s part ensured accurate management of the airport funds, as its operation is a primary business center on the west border of the City. Donald’s involvement included: Financial Management: Preparing & presenting the department’s $24 million budget. Planning: Coordinating with the public infrastructure on behalf of the various private development projects and implementing the former RDA specific plan process. Construction Project Development: Developing the City’s 5-year CIP with a typical total cost in value ranging from $25 million to $45 million. Council Support & Interface: Attending City Council meetings, and providing direct support to City Council through the City Manager’s office. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 26 FULLERTON COMMUNITy CENTER PROJECT The City of fullerton Donald served as Project Manager for the Fullerton Community Center Project, which was one of two major projects being undertaken as part of the Civic Center Area Improvements, and included significant renovations and additions, parking and circulation improvements, and street improvements to Commonwealth Avenue. The approximate cost of the project was $29 million. Project funding was primarily by Redevelopment Agency (RDA) and bond proceeds, with additional funding from Park Dwelling Fund and from approved grants. The project scope included the demolition of the existing Senior Center and Boys and Girls Club structures, the construction of the 48,000 sq. ft. multi- purpose Community Center, and related site improvements along Commonwealth Avenue. The street work required the introduction of a new raised median island between Highland Avenue and Short Street with a signalized mid-block pedestrian crossing, hardscape and landscape improvements, the relocation of ingress/egress westerly to align with Short Street, and the relocation of traffic signals to the Commonwealth Avenue and Short Street intersection. Integration of existing parking assets was needed (including St. Mary’ s Catholic Church) and circulation routes. Improvements were also made on parking lot hardscape, landscape, lighting and signage, mid-block crossing, parking lots, and landscape renovations. The key planning element of the proposed Community Center was to maximize facility use by creating a “ shared” facility for a variety of user groups. The project was a replacement of the existing public facilities located in Amerige Park. In addition, the plan included the relocation of the Amerige Brothers’ Realty Office (a Historic Landmark). Coordination with other appointed bodies and contract agencies included the Fullerton Senior Citizens Club; the Fullerton Boys and Girls Club; the Fullerton Parks and Recreation Community Center Ad Hoc Planning Committee, the Fullerton Parks and Recreation Commission, and the Redevelopment Design Review Committee ( RDRC). While the field and park elements were an important consideration in the site planning and facility design, proposed improvements primarily consist of landscape improvements and integration. ST. COLLEGE BOULEVARD & RAyMOND AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS The City of fullerton Donald performed Project Management services for the City of Fullerton for this state and locally funded, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) oversight grade separation project. The State College Boulevard and Raymond Avenue Grade Separation Projects was located on Raymond Avenue intersecting the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad. Construction activities involved the elimination of the at-grade railroad crossing on Raymond Avenue to facilitate better traffic flow and increase the safety for vehicular commuters. This undercrossing was intended for greatly improving vehicular traffic flow due to the annual increase in train traffic. Moreover the intent was to also reduce the potential for accidents on the road. The existing horizontal roadway configuration of Raymond Avenue was continually maintained even upon completion of the project. Significant coordination with the simultaneous State College Boulevard Grade Separation project was a special project challenge that was met successfully. The initial work had involved storm drain and utility relocations. Shoring review for the BNSF railroad bridge was required and the temporary bypass road for Raymond Avenue was successfully completed. As one of seven OCTA grade separations along this busy corridor, weekly collaboration and coordination with simultaneously on-going OCTA projects was essential. COMMONwEALTh AVENUE STORM DRAIN INSTALLATION The City of fullerton Donald served as the Project Manager on the Commonwealth Avenue Storm Drain Installation Project for the City of Fullerton. The project scope included the installation of a 30-inch storm drain underneath Commonwealth Avenue between Highland Avenue and Malden Avenue that was to be connected to an existing 48-inch storm drain in Highland Avenue. Catch basins were installed at the north side of the Commonwealth Avenue and Malden intersection to reduce frequent intersection flooding. The project also included the reconstruction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, access ramps, and pavementat the northwest and northeast corners of Commonwealth Avenue and Malden Avenue. BASTANChURy ROAD wIDENING & IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT The City of fullerton Donald served as the Project Manager on the Bastanchury Road Widening Project for the City of Fullerton. The intent of the project was to construct improvements on Bastanchury Road between Harbor Boulevard and Fairway Isles Drive, a distance of approximately 1,950 feet, and to widen Bastanchury Road between Harbor Boulevard and just west of Fairway Isles Road from four to six lanes, a distance of approximately 1,693 feet. The remaining project segment of Bastanchury Road was restriped to be consistent with the widened cross section. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 27 QUALIFICATIONS 15 Years Of Experience BS: CiViL ENGiNEERiNG MiNOR:ENViRONMENTAL ENGiNEERiNG University of Calgary, 2005 PE: APEGA Registered Civil Engineer CERTiFiED AutoCAD & Civil 3D FiELDS OF ExPERTiSE ROADWAY WATER DRAINAGE ADA RAMP SEWER INTERSECTION WATER MAIN BIKE PATH rYan dennIs, PE pRojeCt eNGiN eeR BACkGROUND As a Project Engineer for OE, Ryan leads the design team by performing and coordinating detailed designs on public works projects. Ryan has over 15 years of experience. He received his degree in Civil & Environmental Engineering from the University of Calgary and is a Registered Civil Engineer in Albert, Canada. He possesses an ability to produce drawings, layouts, sketches, maps, and graphic representations of engineering designs. He also has extensive knowledge of AutoCAD Civil 3D. Ryan provides support during the overall engineering and design effort. ExPERIENCE NIGUEL ROAD STREET REhABILITATION The City of laguna niguel Ryan provided Project Engineering services for the Niguel Road Street Rehabilitation and ADA Improvement Project. The project consisted of rehabilitating an approximately 1.93 mile (10,200-foot) section of Niguel Road that extends from Alta Tera to Marina Hills Drive. Niguel Road from Highland Avenue to Marina Hills Drive (8,450 linear feet) is an arterial street with two lanes of traffic in either direction, raised center medians, centerline striping, left and right-turn pockets, and bike lanes. Niguel Road from Alta Terra to Highland Avenue is a residential collector street (1,750-feet) with one lane of traffic in both directions. A major part of this project involves the full design of the 64 ramps for the nearly 2 mile stretch hilly roadway. Parking was prohibited on the street except on the north side of Niguel Road from Alta Terra to Galina Way which required traffic management. Additional tasks included repairing curb, gutter, and sidewalk and constructing ADA compliant access ramps where required. DEL AMO BOULEVARD PAVEMENT REhABILITATION The City of cerritos Ryan was the Project Engineer for the Del Amo Boulevard Project. Del Amo Boulevard is a major arterial oriented east/west and is used as a thoroughfare to adjacent cities. The project limits consist of a total of approximately 2,900 linear feet (approximately 0.55 miles) of Del Amo Boulevard between Pioneer Boulevard and Norwalk Boulevard. The south half is under the City of Lakewood’s jurisdiction. Requirements included rehabilitation of pavement, concrete removal and replacement of damaged curb, gutter and sidewalks, identifying and addressing storm water drainage concerns, retrofitting curb access ramps with the latest ADA standards, and updating signing, striping and traffic loops. Close collaboration with the selected landscape architect was necessary to ensure all issues regarding tree root infiltration are addressed to accommodate both the civil and landscape designs and to ensure that the City receives a cohesive package of civil, landscape, and irrigation plans. The plans also included Low Impact Development (LID) Improvements to divert urban run-off from the storm drain system. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 28 wEST 17Th STREET wIDENING PROJECT The City of costa mesa Ryan performed Project Engineering services to the City of Costa Mesa for the West 17th Street Widening from Placentia Avenue to Superior Avenue. 17th Street is a primary arterial. The Standard roadway width for a primary arterial is a 106’ right of way. The existing configuration was a 2-lane divided highway with center two-way left turn lane. The existing land uses were mostly commercial properties with a new mixed-use development at the southeast corner of 17th Street and Pomona Avenue. There were 16 properties along West 17th Street within the limits of this widening. The properties along West 17th Street had varying R/W frontages. This meant that widening affected each property differently. The design intent for this widening was to meet the classification of four-lane Primary Arterial as described in the OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). This includes 2-lanes in each direction with a median. Fy 2017-18 SB1 STREET REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of alhamBr a Ryan provided the City of Alhambra with Project Engineering services for the FY17-18 SB1 Street Rehabilitation Project (RFP 2M18-8). The project entails the rehabilitation of a total of approximately 21,972 feet (4.2 miles) of asphalt concrete (AC) streets located within the City limits and a small portion of street located within the City of South Pasadena. The project is financed using SB1 funds with an estimated construction budget of $954,000 Initially, the City was considering reconstruction, but the cost to rehabilitate the proposed street segments is $2,227,066 based on the reported PCIs and preferred reconstruction methods. To remain within the allotted budget of $954,000, OE prepared a cost-benefit analysis to maximize the budget while utilizing multiple rehabilitation methods. Fy2018-19 CDBG RESIDENTIAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS- C.O. NO. 7150 The City of hesperia Ryan was the Project Engineer for the City of Hesperia on the FY 2018-19 CDBG Street Improvements Project. The project consists of constructing approximately 8,550 linear feet of streets. The project limits included Ash Street from Seventh Avenue to Eleventh Avenue (2,850 linear feet), Larch Street from Seventh Avenue to Eleventh Avenue (2,850 linear feet), and Wells Fargo Street from Seventh Avenue to Eleventh Avenue (2,850 linear feet). The streets are located within a residential zone and are to be upgraded from dirt roadways to 26” wide asphalt concrete pavement with an inverted crown design. Additionally, all surface utility appurtenances were to be preserved/modified to accommodate the new roadways and driveways of the adjacent residences were tied into the streets. 2017-2018 wATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT - PHASE 2 The City of sIerra madre Ryan provided the City of Sierra Madre with full Project Engineering services for the Water Main Replacement Project. The purpose of the project was to replace 18 segments of existing 2-inch to 6-inch steel water mains with ductile iron pipe. The pipes were to be installed in parallel trenches to the existing pipes to minimize road reconstruction requirements and ensure that the trench limits encompass the existing roadway patches from previous repairs. Additionally, fire hydrants, service laterals, valves, blow-offs, air release valves, and other water appurtenances needed to be reconnected, repurposed, or newly installed as necessary. The project included approximately 13,495 linear feet of water mains to be replaced. The water mains are located primarily within residential land use zones. 125 UNIQUE ADA ACCESS RAMPS DESIGNS The City of rancho cucamonga Ryan provided Project Engineering services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a consecutive 3 year period on the FY 17-20 ADA Access Ramps Projects. These projects included approximately 292 total ADA ramps which required custom designs for each ramp. The FY 17/18 project included approximately 125 ADA ramps, with 43 additional ramps added by the City. The FY 18/19 project included approximately 112 ADA ramps, with 15 additional ramps added by the City. The FY 19/20 project includes approximately 55 ADA ramps. The ramp work on these projects were completed on an expedited schedule and with short turnaround times. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 29 QUALIFICATIONS 7 Years Of Experience BS: CiViL ENGiNEERiNG, 2014 CA Polytechnic University, Pomona AS : MAT h E MAT i C S Mount San Antonio College, Walnut EIT #163008 Engineer in Training FiELDS OF ExPERTiSE ROADWAY WATER DRAINAGE ADA RAMPS SEWER PARK BEAUTIFICATION BIKE LANES & TRAILS TRILINGUAL (FLUENT) English-Mandarin-Cantonese SOFTwARE PROFiCiENCy AutoCAD-Civil3D-MicroStation Pipe Network-Flowmaster-HydroCalc Bluebeam-VisualBasic aleX ander liu, EIT, ENV SP P rOJecT engineer BACkGROUND As a Lead Engineer, Alexander continues to build his knowledge and experience in the Civil Engineering Industry. He is well adept in all aspects of civil design including grading, street improvement, drainage, site utilities (sanitary sewer, storm drain, domestic and fire water), erosion measure control, horizontal control, underground wet utilities design, storm water management, site demolition, Best Management Practice (BMP) design and hydrology study involving various high- profile development projects. Before joining the OE team, Alexander served to the San Bernardino County office of WSP USA, where he was responsible for performing project design and production from conceptual and preliminary engineering to final design. Alexander also assisted the senior management team in technical risk assessments, design planning, budgeting and proposal preparation for multiple commercial development and transportation pursuits, and he provided training to junior engineers on the design of precise grading and piping systems. Alexander served as the main contact for other design disciplines, clients and public agencies to ensure quality in drawings and collaboration of tasks. Alexander has practice and proficiency with Civil 3D, able to create surfaces, corridors, plans and profiles for project site, street, roadway and underground piping systems, from conceptual design to final engineering. ExPERIENCE NIGUEL ROAD STREET REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of laguna niguel Alexander is providing Project Engineering services for the City of Laguna Niguel on the Niguel Road Street Rehabilitation Project. The project consists of rehabilitating an approximately 1.93 mile (10,200- foot) section of Niguel Road that extends from Alta Tera to Marina Hills Drive. Niguel Road from Highland Avenue to Marina Hills Drive (8,450 linear feet) is an arterial street with two lanes of traffic in either direction, raised center medians or centerline striping, left and right- turn pockets, and bike lanes. Niguel Road from Alta Terra to Highland Avenue is a residential collector street (1,750-feet) with one lane of traffic in both directions. Parking is prohibited on the street except on the north side of Niguel Road from Alta Terra to Galina Way. Additional tasks included repairing curb, gutter, and sidewalk and constructing ADA compliant access ramps where required. PORTOLA PARkwAy & SAND CANyON AVENUE STREET RE h A BILITATION The City of irvine Alexander is providing the City of Irvine with Project Engineering services. The project consists of rehabilitating approximately 4,500 linear feet of Portola Parkway and 9,300 linear feet of Sand Canyon Avenue, as well as rehabilitating the intersections of Sand Canyon Avenue & Laguna Canyon, Sand Canyon Avenue & Trabuco Road, and Sand Canyon Avenue & Irvine Boulevard. Additional design elements include reconstructing curb ramps to meet ADA requirements where deficient. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 30 BELLFLOwER BOULEVARD COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT - HSIP FUNDED The City of BellfloWer Alexander is providing to the City of Bellflower Project Engineering services for the HSIP – Bellflower Boulevard Complete Streets Project. The project consists of enhancing approximately 2,200 linear feet (0.42 miles) of Bellflower Boulevard from Artesia Boulevard to the South City Limit, approximately 330 feet south of Rose Street. Bellflower Boulevard is an arterial street with two lanes of traffic and curbside parking in both directions, a dual left turn lane, and traffic signals at high volume intersections. The project was partially funded by Cycle 9 of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The project has an estimated cost of $1,162,100. The street enhancements included adding Class III Bike Lanes, reducing the lane widths, adding raised medians with landscaping and irrigation, upgrading and adding high visibility crosswalks, rapid flashing beacons, and pedestrian countdown heads at the intersections, bulb-outs, and road resurfacing. LOS NIETOS ROAD REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of santa fe springs Alexander is serving as Project Engineer to the City of Santa Fe Springs on the Los Nietos Road Rehabilitation Project. The project consists of rehabilitating approximately 2.3 miles of roadway on Los Nietos Road between Pioneer Blvd. and Painter Ave. The segment of Los Nietos was noted to be in poor condition. Widespread alligator cracking, block cracking, and potholing were observed throughout the project limits. The rehabilitation entailed available grind and overlay on the street segments and milling the full width of the street in areas where the deterioration was extensive. Our team also identified areas of isolated deterioration where digouts and milling the edges of the street may be necessary. Additional tasks include reconstructing curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalks in disrepair, as well as constructing ADA compliant driveways and curb ramps. Railroad right- of-ways intersect Los Nietos Road within the limits of the project. All design and construction activities within these right-of-way was coordinated with the PUC and carried out in accordance with the applicable PUC Codes. EUCLID ROADwAy & SEwER RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT The City of fullerton Alexander served as a Project Engineer to the City of Fullerton on the Euclid Roadway & Sewer Reconstruction from Williamson to Fern Project. The project consisted of reconstructing or resurfacing approximately 3,700 linear feet of arterial streets between Fern Drive and Williamson Avenue and replacing approximately 1,700 feet of sewer mains between Malvern Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue. The sewer work included removing the existing 10-inch VCP and replacing it with new 12-inch VCP pipe between Commonwealth and Malvern and removing and replacing sewer north of Malvern to the end of the street project limits at Fern without upsizing. The work also included removing the manholes at the center of the Euclid Street/Chapman Avenue intersection and establishing a new connection point approximately 50 feet to the east along Chapman Avenue as well as reconstructing the double barrel siphon and adjusting invert elevations to achieve a suitable slope. The design utilized a trenchless method to install the siphon beneath the OCPW Brea Creek Channel. Additional tasks included adjusting manhole elevations and reconnected service laterals, constructing new curb and gutter where gutter is absent, constructing ADA compliant curb ramps, and repairing curb, gutter, cross gutters, sidewalks and driveways where required. The City utilized SB1 funds for the road rehabilitation and local funds for the sewer improvements. NEwPORT BOULEVARD wIDENING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT The City of costa mesa Alexander provided Project Engineering services on the Newport Boulevard Widening Improvements Project for the City of Costa Mesa. The project consists of widening a portion 77 Fair Drive of southbound Newport Boulevard to accommodate a fourth through lane and improve its Level of Service from the current "F" rating (ranging from 1.10 to 1.30). The section of roadway to be enhanced extends approximately 2,700 linear feet southwest from 19th Street to the Superior Avenue turn-off located northeast of 17th Street. The project is located within Caltrans jurisdiction and requires traffic signal modifications, utility and street light relocations, and right-of way acquisitions to accommodate the additional through lane and right-turn pockets. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 31 QUALIFICATIONS 18 Years Of Experience BROwARD COLLEGE COURSEwORk Civil Engineering Technology & Construction Management OCTA PAVEMENT REhABiLiTATiON (prior) Certification CERTIFIED AutoCAD & Civil 3D FiELDS OF ExPERTiSE ROADWAY WATER DRAINAGE ADA RAMPS SEWER PARK WATER MAIN BIKE LANES & TRAILS daY t on lo W e Pr OJ ecT engineer BACkGROUND As a Project Engineer for OE, Dayton performs and coordinates detailed designs on arterial roadways, utility coordination for major relocations on high profile projects and assistance in coordination efforts on multiple projects. He possesses an ability to produce drawings, layouts, sketches, maps, and graphic representations of engineering designs. He also has extensive knowledge of AutoCAD, Autodesk Civil 3D, Eagle Pointe Civil package and others. Dayton provides support during the overall engineering and design effort, including the preparation of design drawings and calculations. He is experienced in developing residential, commercial, and industrial conceptual site plans from the preliminary phase to final construction documents; knowledgeable in the design of gravity sanitary sewer systems; skilled in the design of sanitary sewer pump stations and force main systems; accomplished in the design of water mains for residential, commercial and industrial projects; practiced in the design of drainage systems; talented in preparing drainage calculations for effective and efficient drainage systems; and familiar in the design of grading plans for storm water drainage and ADA compliance. Dayton is also extremely proficient in preparing and submitting packages to governmental agencies to obtain required permits for construction and in the design of roadway layouts including intersections, roundabouts, turn-lanes and travel lanes. ExPERIENCE yALE AVENUE REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of irvine Dayton provided Project Engineering services to the City of Irvine located at Yale Avenue from Deerfield Avenue to the I-5 Overpass. Yale Avenue serves as a major Northeast Southwest arterial for the City of Irvine. This segment of Yale Avenue varies between a 2-lane arterial with bike lanes to a 4-lane arterial with bike lanes and raised medians. The limits of this project were entirely within residential neighborhoods with Heritage Park and a fire station located at the northwest corner of Yale Avenue and Walnut Avenue. The first segment from Deerfield Avenue to approximately Edgmere Avenue entailed a 2” mill and a 2” Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt Type G (RHMA-G) overlay with some full depth structural sections where the street is severely deteriorated. The second segment of roadway from Edgmere Avenue to the I-5 Overpass required a 6” mill and placement of 2.5” of RHMA-G over 4” Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) in the street with a 2” to 2½” transitional grind at the bike lanes. This project also corrected ADA deficiencies for sidewalks and ramps. Our design team checked for existing roadway signs and striping for compliance with both the City standards as well as the 3R federal design requirements. Another important aspect of this project was its proximity to Caltrans right- of-way. Traffic control through the I-5 bridge overcrossing required obtaining a Caltrans Encroachment Permit. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 32 SPRING STREET AT BELLFLOwER AND LAkEwOOD BLVD. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT The City of long Beach Dayton was the Project Engineer for the City of Long Beach for two intersection widening projects along Spring Street. The first project is along Spring Street at Bellflower Boulevard and the other is along Spring Street at Lakewood Boulevard. The goal of the project was to implement congestion management and reduction strategies at these intersections to improve capacity and movement for future volumes. The project included design work for raised medians, traffic signal modifications, turn pocket extensions, utility relocation and utility adjustments. The existing conditions at the intersection of Spring Street and Bellflower Boulevard included a single left turn lane in each direction, three through lanes in each direction, and dedicated right turn pockets for all intersection legs except for the west leg. The intent at this intersection was to extend the left turn pockets for the north, east and south legs. The project also extended the southbound right turn pocket. The existing conditions at the intersection of Spring Street and Lakewood Boulevard include Dual left turn pockets in all directions, three through lanes in all directions and dual right turn lanes from southbound Lakewood Boulevard to westbound Spring Street. The future capacity required an increase in pocket lengths for the left turn pockets in each direction on Spring Street along with an increased length of the dual right turn pockets on southbound Lakewood Boulevard. DEL AMO BOULEVARD PROJECT The City of cerritos Dayton was the Project Engineer on the Del Amo Boulevard Project. Del Amo Boulevard is a major arterial oriented east/west and is used as a thoroughfare to adjacent cities. The project limits consist of a total of approximately 2,900 linear feet (approximately 0.55 miles) of Del Amo Boulevard between Pioneer Boulevard and Norwalk Boulevard. The project is limited to the north half of the street as the south half is under the City of Lakewood’s jurisdiction. The project requirements included rehabilitation of pavement, concrete removal and replacement of damaged curb, gutter and sidewalks, identifying and addressing storm water drainage concerns, retrofitting or reconstructing curb access ramps and driveways with the latest ADA standards, and updating signing, striping and traffic loops. Overgrown trees were present throughout the project limits and were significantly impacting roadway, sidewalk, and gutter conditions. Close collaboration with the selected landscape architect was necessary to ensure all issues regarding tree root infiltration were addressed to accommodate the civil and landscape designs and to ensure that the City received a cohesive package of civil, landscape, and irrigation plans. The plans included Low Impact Development (LID) Improvements to divert urban run-off from the storm drain system. CITywIDE ADA CURB RAMPS & PATh OF TRAVEL PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITy IMPROVEMENTS The City of long Beach Dayton provided Project Engineering services to the City of Long Beach involving Citywide ADA Curb Ramps and Path of Travel Pedestrian Accessibility Improvements. The objective of the project is to design and construct at least 20,000 new ADA compliant curb ramps over the next 20 years in accordance with current State and Federal accessibility codes and standards. The project is to complete 1,000 of those ramps deemed most critical for accessibility. OE’s team utilizes AutoCAD Civil 3D on 3D surfaces for the designs in compliance with the Long Beach Standard Plan No. 122 in order to satisfy the maximum allowable slopes dictated in the most current version of Caltrans Standard Plan A88A, and has had to consider other accessibility standards due to occasional unavailability of a suitable ramp case and type. The project work entails the preparation of detailed individual curb ramp construction plans with the inclusion of horizontal geometrics, design elevations and dimensions, and utility appurtenance adjustments and relocations, along with concrete infrastructure such as curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalk. The necessary reconstruction is incorporated in order to accommodate the new curb ramps, meet accessibility requirements, and maintain drainage. Additional design elements have also required consideration, which involve constructing 32”x54” size flat landings next to each pedestrian push- button at signalized intersections and installing guardrails where retaining curbs adjoin walkable hard surfaces. Due to the large volume of ramps reconstructed each year, small batches of design details and construction of the ramps are being provided to the City at regular intervals through out a continuous process, with City submittals made on a monthly basis at a scaled frequency and quality. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 33 QUALIFICATIONS 3 Years Of Experience BS: CiViL ENGiNEERiNG, 2018 CA Polytechnic University, Pomona EIT #164995, 2018 Engineer in Training SOFTwARE PROFiCiENCy AutoCAD-MicroStation-InRoads FiELDS OF ExPERTiSE ROADWAY WATER DRAINAGE ADA RAMPS SEWER PARK SIGNAL TRAFFIC Kimilee murillo, EIT Pr OJ ecT engineer BACkGROUND Kimilee is a recent graduate of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, having earned her BS degree in Civil Engineering. She has developed her engineering design skills in CAD, MicroStation and InRoads during her time working for ADVANTEC Consulting Engineering. Her design work involved plans for traffic signals & traffic control, signing & striping, street lighting and interchanges as applied to pavement and street rehabilitation, as well as City standard QA/QC plan check review and coordination. In that time, Kimilee developed a familiarity with the Caltrans Highway Design Manual and WATCH Manual, Latest Editions, utility coordination, team collaboration and training, field reviews, and regulation compliance. Kimilee has been EIT certified in Civil Engineering and is on her way to becoming a certified registered civil engineer. ExPERIENCE wEST 17Th STREET wIDENING PROJECT The City of costa mesa Kimilee is providing Project Engineering services to the City of Costa Mesa for the West 17th Street Widening Project, from Placentia Avenue to Superior Avenue. 17th Street is a primary arterial. The Standard roadway width for a primary arterial is a 106’ right of way. The existing configuration was a 2-lane divided highway with center two-way left turn lane. The existing land uses were mostly commercial properties with a new mixed-use development at the southeast corner of 17th Street and Pomona Avenue. There were 16 properties along West 17th Street within the limits of this widening. The properties along West 17th Street had varying R/W frontages. This meant that widening affected each property differently. The design intent for this widening was to meet the classification of four-lane Primary Arterial as described in the OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). This includes 2-lanes in each direction with a median. LOS NIETOS ROAD REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of santa fe springs Kimilee is providing Project Engineering services to the City of Santa Fe Springs on the Los Nietos Road Rehabilitation Project. The project consists of rehabilitating approximately 2.3 miles of roadway on Los Nietos Road between Pioneer Blvd. and Painter Ave. The segment of Los Nietos was noted to be in poor condition. Widespread alligator cracking, block cracking, and potholing were observed throughout the project limits. The rehabilitation entailed available grind and overlay on the street segments and milling the full width of the street in areas where the deterioration was extensive. Our team also identified areas of isolated deterioration where digouts and milling the edges of the street may be necessary. Additional tasks include reconstructing curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalks in Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 34 disrepair, as well as constructing ADA compliant driveways and curb ramps. Railroad right-of-ways intersect Los Nietos Road within the limits of the project. All design and construction activities within these right-of-way was coordinated with the PUC and carried out in accordance with the applicable PUC Codes. SAND CANyON & PORTOLA PARkwAy IMPROVEMENTS The City of irvine Kimilee is serving as a Project Engineer for the City of Irvine for the Portola Parkway and Sand Canyon Avenue Street Rehabilitation Project. The project consists of rehabilitating approximately 4,500 linear feet of Portola Parkway and 9,300 linear feet of Sand Canyon Avenue, as well as rehabilitating the intersections of Sand Canyon Avenue & Laguna Canyon, Sand Canyon Avenue & Trabuco Road, and Sand Canyon Avenue & Irvine Boulevard. Additional design elements include reconstructing curb ramps to meet ADA requirements where deficient. CITywIDE STREET RESIDENTIAL PROJECT The City of san BernardIno For the City of San Bernardino, Kimilee provided Project Engineering service on the Citywide Street Residential Project. The project requirements included pavement rehabilitation, concrete removal, replacement of damaged curb, gutter and sidewalks, retrofitting or reconstructing curb access ramps with latest ADA standards, and updating signing and striping. The project limits consist of a total of approximately 20,300 linear feet (3.85 miles) of roadway on residential streets. MEyER ROAD REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of santa fe sprIngs Kimilee is serving as a Project Engineer to the City of Santa Fe Springs on the Meyer Road Rehabilitation Project. The project consists of rehabilitating approximately 1,100 linear feet of roadway on Meyer Road between Shoemaker Avenue and the east City Limits. This segment of Meyer Road was noted to be in poor condition. Widespread alligator cracking, block cracking, and potholing were observed. The rehabilitation entailed a variable grind and overlay on the street segment as well as identifying areas of isolated deterioration where digouts may be necessary. Additional tasks include reconstructing curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalks in disrepair, as well as constructing ADA compliant driveways and curb ramps. NIGUEL ROAD STREET REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of laguna nIguel Kimilee is providing Project Engineering services for the City of Laguna Niguel on the Niguel Road Street Rehabilitation Project. The project consists of rehabilitating an approximately 1.93 mile (10,200-foot) section of Niguel Road that extends from Alta Tera to Marina Hills Drive. Niguel Road from Highland Avenue to Marina Hills Drive (8,450 linear feet) is an arterial street with two lanes of traffic in either direction, raised center medians or centerline striping, left and right-turn pockets, and bike lanes. Niguel Road from Alta Terra to Highland Avenue is a residential collector street (1,750-feet) with one lane of traffic in both directions. Parking is prohibited on the street except on the north side of Niguel Road from Alta Terra to Galina Way. Additional tasks included repairing curb, gutter, and sidewalk and constructing ADA compliant access ramps where required. NEwPORT BOULEVARD wIDENING IMPROVEMENTS The City of costa mesa For the City of Costa Mesa, Kimilee provided Project Engineering service on the Newport Boulevard Widening Improvements Project. The project consists of widening a portion 77 Fair Drive of southbound Newport Boulevard to accommodate a fourth through lane and improve its Level of Service from the current “F” rating (ranging from 1.10 to 1.30). The section of roadway to be enhanced extends approximately 2,700 linear feet southwest from 19th Street to the Superior Avenue turn-off located northeast of 17th Street. The project is located within Caltrans jurisdiction and requires traffic signal modifications, utility and street light relocations, and right-of way acquisitions to accommodate the additional through lane and right-turn pockets. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 35 QualIfIcatIons 3 Years of Experience BS: CiViL ENGiNEERiNG California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, 2020 AS: ARChiTECTURAL DESiGN Orange Coast College, 2016 SOFTwARE PROFiCiENCy AutoCAD-Civil 3D-Microstation-Revit- Bluebeam-HDL FiELDS OF ExPERTiSE ROADWAY WATER DRAINAGE ADA RAMP SEWER INTERSECTION WATER MAIN BIKE PATH rileY moore pRojeCt eNGiNeeR BACkGROUND Riley is a recent graduate of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona in the field of Civil Engineering. She is an active Project Engineer with a penchant for design where she makes great use of her extended proficiency in utilizing the most up-to-date engineering design software, which includes AutoCAD, Civil 3D, Microstation, Revit, Bluebeam and HDL. Her main fields of development and expertise include Architectural Design, Transportation Engineering, Structural Analysis and Fluid Mechanics. Recently, for nearly the past 3 years, Riley served the City of Clarement where she developed her skills and knowledge involving the review and processing of plan checks for residential improvements, striping plans for City streets, permitting for public works, utility, grading, and oversized transportation, construction documentation, topographic mapping, line drawing, land development solutions and improvements, and basic project take-offs. In her active role she maintains a positive influence among her peers, with a robust interest in advancing her knowledge and skills within the industry. ExPERIENCE CITywIDE ADA CURB RAMPS AND PATh OF TRAVEL PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITy IMPROVEMENTS The City of long Beach Riley is providing Project Engineering services to the City of Long Beach involving Citywide ADA Curb Ramps and Path of Travel Pedestrian Accessibility Improvements. The objective of the project is to design and construct at least 20,000 new ADA compliant curb ramps over the next 20 years in accordance with current State and Federal accessibility codes and standards. The project is to complete 1,000 of those ramps deemed most critical for accessibility. OE’s team utilizes AutoCAD Civil 3D on 3D surfaces for the designs in compliance with the Long Beach Standard Plan No. 122 in order to satisfy the maximum allowable slopes dictated in the most current version of Caltrans Standard Plan A88A, and has had to consider other accessibility standards due to occasional unavailability of a suitable ramp case and type. The project work entails the preparation of detailed individual curb ramp construction plans with the inclusion of horizontal geometrics, design elevations and dimensions, and utility appurtenance adjustments and relocations, along with concrete infrastructure such as curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalk. The necessary reconstruction is incorporated in order to accommodate the new curb ramps, meet accessibility requirements, and maintain drainage. Additional design elements have also required consideration, which involve constructing 32”x54” size flat landings next to each pedestrian push-button at signalized intersections and installing guardrails where retaining curbs adjoin walkable hard surfaces. Due to the large volume of ramps reconstructed each year, small batches of design details and construction of the ramps are being provided to the City at regular intervals through out a continuous process, with City submittals made on a monthly basis at a scaled frequency and quality. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 36 NEwPORT BOULEVARD wIDENING IMPROVEMENTS The City of costa mesa For the City of Costa Mesa, Riley provided Project Engineering service on the Newport Boulevard Widening Improvements Project. The project consists of widening a portion 77 Fair Drive of southbound Newport Boulevard to accommodate a fourth through lane and improve its Level of Service from the current “F” rating (ranging from 1.10 to 1.30). The section of roadway to be enhanced extends approximately 2,700 linear feet southwest from 19th Street to the Superior Avenue turn-off located northeast of 17th Street. The project is located within Caltrans jurisdiction and requires traffic signal modifications, utility and street light relocations, and right-of way acquisitions to accommodate the additional through lane and right-turn pockets. EUCLID ROADwAy & SEwER RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT The City of fullerton Riley provided Project Engineering services to the City of Fullerton on the Euclid Roadway and Sewer Reconstruction from Williamson to Fern Project. The project consisted of reconstructing or resurfacing approximately 3,700 linear feet of arterial streets between Fern Drive and Williamson Avenue and replacing approximately 1,700 feet of sewer mains between Malvern Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue. The sewer work included removing the existing 10-inch VCP and replacing it with new 12-inch VCP pipe between Commonwealth and Malvern and removing and replacing sewer north of Malvern to the end of the street project limits at Fern without upsizing. The worked also included removing the manholes at the center of the Euclid Street/Chapman Avenue intersection and establishing a new connection point approximately 50 feet to the east along Chapman Avenue as well as reconstructing the double barrel siphon and adjusting invert elevations to achieve a suitable slope. The design utilized a trenchless method to install the siphon beneath the OCPW Brea Creek Channel. Additional tasks included adjusting manhole elevations and reconnected service laterals, constructing new curb and gutter where gutter is absent, constructing ADA compliant curb ramps, and repairing curb, gutter, cross gutters, sidewalks and driveways where required. The City utilized SB1 funds for the road rehabilitation and local funds for the sewer improvements. MANhATTAN BEACh BOULEVARD AND SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD wIDENING The City of manhattan Beach Riley is providing Project Engineering services to the City of Manhattan Beach on the Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard Widening project. The proposed project limits include the intersection of Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard to accommodate dual left turn lanes in the northbound to westbound, eastbound to southbound, and westbound to northbound directions. The City of Lawndale is east of the project area, the City of Redondo Beach is south of the intersection, El Segundo sits to the north, and the Pacific Ocean to the west. Commercial businesses can be found throughout the project limits. The purpose of the project was to increase the operational capabilities of the intersection. This was accomplished by adding dual left turn lanes to the westbound, northbound and eastbound lanes. Northbound and southbound Sepulveda will have five travel lanes; two left turn lanes, and three through lanes. Eastbound and Westbound Manhattan Beach Boulevard will have five travel lanes; two left turn lanes, two through lanes and one dedicated right turn lane. TURTLE ROCk PARkING LOT IMPROVEMENTS The City of irvine Riley is providing Project Engineering services to the City of Irvine for the Turtle Rock Community Park Parking Lot Improvements Project. The project consists of rehabilitating the pavement on the east and west parking lots. Additional tasks include reconstructing curb ramps to meet ADA requirements where deficient, removing the circular planters in the center of the east parking lot and replacing them with diamond-shaped planters, and modifying parking stall striping to increase capacity. MEyER ROAD REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of santa fe sprIngs Riley is serving as a Project Engineer to the City of Santa Fe Springs on the Meyer Road Rehabilitation Project. The project consists of rehabilitating approximately 1,100 linear feet of roadway on Meyer Road between Shoemaker Avenue and the east City Limits. This segment of Meyer Road was noted to be in poor condition. Widespread alligator cracking, block cracking, and potholing were observed. The rehabilitation entailed a variable grind and overlay on the street segment as well as identifying areas of isolated deterioration where digouts may be necessary. Additional tasks include reconstructing curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalks in disrepair, as well as constructing ADA compliant driveways and curb ramps. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 37 QualIfIcatIons 1 Year Of Experience BS: CiViL ENGiNEERiNG (candidate) Cal State University, Long Beach MESA Math Engineering Science Achievement FiELDS OF ExPERTiSE ROADWAY WATER DRAINAGE ADA RAMPS SEWER PARK BEAUTIFICATION BIKE LANES & TRAILS BILINGUAL (FLUENT) English-Spanish SOFTwARE PROFiCiENCy AutoCAD-AutoDesk-ArcGis-MatLab amY flores Pr OJ ecT engineer BACkGROUND Amy is a Senior Civil Engineering student with strong communication skills pursing an internship program at Onward Engineering as a gateway to further enhance and increase her job-related knowledge and skills. Amy has achieved academic excellence while in her studies, having made the Dean’s list, gaining acceptance into the Scholars Honors Program, and has earned her Math Engineering Science Achievement. Amy has obtained work experience as a fabrication lead, Co-Op quality engineer, and student professional worker in providing collaboration, training, QA/QC, leadership, testing, meeting requirements, and development for the Cities of Los Angeles, South Gate, Universal City, and Long Beach. In the City of Norwalk, she participated in rover design for the NASA Space Grant: Arduino Project, presenting her findings at the regional conference. She is currently working on obtaining Fundamentals of Engineering certification by end of 2020. ExPERIENCE SAND CANyON & PORTOLA PARkwAy IMPROVEMENTS The City of IrvIne Amy is serving as a Project Engineer for the City of Irvine for the Portola Parkway and Sand Canyon Avenue Street Rehabilitation Project. The project consists of rehabilitating approximately 4,500 linear feet of Portola Parkway and 9,300 linear feet of Sand Canyon Avenue, as well as rehabilitating the intersections of Sand Canyon Avenue & Laguna Canyon, Sand Canyon Avenue & Trabuco Road, and Sand Canyon Avenue & Irvine Boulevard. Additional design elements include reconstructing curb ramps to meet ADA requirements where deficient. yALE AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS The City of IrvIne Amy is providing Project Engineering services to the City of Irvine on the Yale Avenue Rehabilitation project, located at Yale Avenue from Deerfield Avenue to the I-5 Overpass. Yale Avenue serves as a major Northeast Southwest arterial for the City of Irvine. This segment of Yale Avenue varies between a 2-lane arterial with bike lanes to a 4-lane arterial with bike lanes and raised medians. The limits of this project were entirely within residential neighborhoods with Heritage Park and a fire station located at the northwest corner of Yale Avenue and Walnut Avenue. The first segment from Deerfield Avenue to approximately Edgmere Avenue entailed a 2” mill and a 2” Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt Type G (RHMA-G) overlay with some full depth structural sections where the street is severely deteriorated. The second segment of roadway from Edgmere Avenue to the I-5 Overpass required a 6” mill and placement of 2.5” of RHMA-G over 4” Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) in the street with a 2” to 2½” transitional grind at the bike lanes. This project also corrected ADA deficiencies for sidewalks and ramps. Our design team checked for existing roadway Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 38 signs and striping for compliance with both the City standards as well as the 3R federal design requirements. Another important aspect of this project was its proximity to Caltrans right-of-way. Traffic control through the I-5 bridge overcrossing required obtaining a Caltrans Encroachment Permit. LOS NIETOS ROAD REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of santa fe springs Amy is providing Project Engineering services to the City of Santa Fe Springs on the Los Nietos Road Rehabilitation Project. The project consists of rehabilitating approximately 2.3 miles of roadway on Los Nietos Road between Pioneer Blvd. and Painter Ave. The segment of Los Nietos was noted to be in poor condition. Widespread alligator cracking, block cracking, and potholing were observed throughout the project limits. The rehabilitation entailed available grind and overlay on the street segments and milling the full width of the street in areas where the deterioration was extensive. Our team also identified areas of isolated deterioration where digouts and milling the edges of the street may be necessary. Additional tasks include reconstructing curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalks in disrepair, as well as constructing ADA compliant driveways and curb ramps. Railroad right- of-ways intersect Los Nietos Road within the limits of the project. All design and construction activities within these right-of-way was coordinated with the PUC and carried out in accordance with the applicable PUC Codes. MEyER ROAD REhABILITATION PROJECT The City of santa fe sprIngs Amy is serving as a Project Engineer to the City of Santa Fe Springs on the Meyer Road Rehabilitation Project. The project consists of rehabilitating approximately 1,100 linear feet of roadway on Meyer Road between Shoemaker Avenue and the east City Limits. This segment of Meyer Road was noted to be in poor condition. Widespread alligator cracking, block cracking, and potholing were observed. The rehabilitation entailed a variable grind and overlay on the street segment as well as identifying areas of isolated deterioration where digouts may be necessary. Additional tasks include reconstructing curb, gutter, cross-gutters, and sidewalks in disrepair, as well as constructing ADA compliant driveways and curb ramps. GREENSTONE AVENUE PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT The City of santa fe sprIngs Amy is providing Project Engineering services for the City of Santa Fe Springs for the Greenstone Avenue Pavement Reconstruction Project. The project limits are Lakeland Avenue to Sunshine Ave and Sunshine Avenue from Greenstone to Shoemaker Avenue. The surrounding business included heavy commercial and industrial with mostly large truck traffic. The existing roadway is severely distressed asphalt that has alligator cracking throughout the roadway. OE worked with the City and came up with an alternative approach to give this roadway extended life. The method of reconstruction used is Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC). It uses a machine similar to an asphalt paving machine in order to place a low slump concrete that is then compacted with a roller. This method drastically reduced the cure time of traditional concrete down to hours instead of days, limiting negative impact to the surrounding businesses. This method also lowers the downtime for residents and businesses. As a result, because it uses paving machines, it can be completed quickly and at a much lower cost per square foot. The scope of work includes 317,500 square feet of pavement reconstruction, 1,270 lineal feet of curb reconstruction, 2,700 square feet of sidewalk reconstruction, 1,510 square feet of cross gutter reconstruction, 6,800 square feet of driveway reconstruction and 26 manhole adjustments along with various other items of work. CITywIDE STREET RESIDENTIAL PROJECT The City of san BernardIno For the City of San Bernardino, Amy provided Project Engineering service on the Citywide Street Residential Project. The project requirements included pavement rehabilitation, concrete removal, replacement of damaged curb, gutter and sidewalks, retrofitting or reconstructing curb access ramps with latest ADA standards, and updating signing and striping. The project limits consist of a total of approximately 20,300 linear feet (3.85 miles) of roadway on residential streets. k AISER MEDICAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION-SwPPP REPORTS & UTILITIES PLANS The City of chino Amy served as Project Engineer for this project which consisted of the demolition of the existing Krikorian Theatre, and construction of a new Kaiser Medical Office Building, café, parking lot and two other mult-use medical business buildings. The site is approximately 2.53 acres. Alex is responsible for the preparation of SWPPP and WQMP reports, grading and onsite utilities plans (storm drain, sanitary sewer, domestic and fire water,). Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 39 Geotechnical Investigation Amir Ghavibazoo, PhD Pavement Engineer p: (562) 426-3355 2883 E. Spring St., Suite. 300 Long Beach, CA. 90806TWINING TWINING INC. develops geotechnical investigation programs that include field exploration and laboratory testing to evaluate subsurface conditions at a wide variety of sites. Field investigation methods include small and large diameter borings, cone penetration testing, down-hole logging, installation of monitoring wells, and trenching for geological/seismological hazards and fault investigations. Twining’s engineers understand the importance of communication during construction and work closely with the technicians to provide seamless testing and engineering services. Twining’s in-house laboratories ensure quick turnaround and allow their staff to provide closely monitored quality control at all times. Their experience in meeting the needs of agencies include the Division of the State Architect (DSA), Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) and other public agencies and municipalities. AMiR GhAViBAZOO, PhD PAVEMENT ENGINEER & ASPHALT MATERIAL SPECIALIST quALiFiCATiONS PhD: Civil & Environmental Engineering - North Dakota State University MS: Railways Engineering - Iran University of Science and Technology ABOuT Amir has extensive research experience and in-depth understanding on many aspects of pavement materials specifically rubberized asphalt. His experience includes characterization of rubberized asphalt binders and developing mix designs following Superpave specifications. Additionally, he has extensive experience with advanced performance testing of asphalt binder including Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR), Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR) and other asphalt binder quality control tests. During his graduate study, Amir obtained a great knowledge and expertise on Pavement Management Systems (MicroPaver), Pavement Evaluation and Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies. He is expert in calculating the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) through visual inspection following the engineering army corp. methodology as well as conducting Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) for different rehabilitation strategies for pavements. EXPERIENCE GRAPEFRUIT BOULEVARD PAVEMENT EVALUATION COACHELLA, CA As a Pavement Engineer, Amir performed pavement evaluation on 1.7 mile stretch of Grapefruit Boulevard for the city of Coachella. The surface condition assessment was performed following the Caltrans Flexible Pavement Rehabilitation Manual and ASTM Standard D6433. Also, boring and coring were performed to investing the subsurface condition of the road. Based on collected information, different rehabilitation strategies were calculated and recommended to the City of Coachella, including Cold Central Plant Recycled Asphalt Concrete Pavement (CCPRACP) and Cement Stabilized Pulverized Base (CSPB). Also, the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the section was calculated, following the Standard COLD RECyCLING AND SOIL STABALIZATION LOS ANGELES, CA Amir served as Pavement Engineer, performing several Cold Recycling and Soil Stabilization Mix Designs for LA County. Mr. Ghavibazoo is serving as pavement engineer for these projects. He is responsible for designing mixes based on the county requirements and material properties. He is also responsible for the oversight of the lab testing required to design these types of mixes. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 40 Topographic Surveying Lam Le Professional Land Surveyor p: (909) 484.4200 f : (909) 484.4229 1269 Pomona Rd. Suite 108 Corona, CA 91710 CL SURVEYING & MAPPING is a Certified DBE, MBE and SBE Land Surveying Firm. Their team of qualified and experienced surveyors provide clients the most cost efficient, professional and personalized services in the industry. For over 10 years, OE has subcontracted almost solely with CL Surveying to provide any topographic survey, legal descriptions and plats, and construction staking on our design projects, including the ones listed below. Their Principals are all experienced, licensed land surveyors; they are signatory to the labor agreement with the Operating Engineers Local 12 allowing access to a large pool of experienced surveyors to staff any size project. Working with clients in the Public and Private sector, they prepare Records of Survey, Parcel Maps and Parcel Map Exemption Applications (Lot Line Adjustments), Tract Maps, & Legal Descriptions and ALTA Surveys. LAM LE, PLS DIRECTOR OF MAPPING quALiFiCATiONS BS: Aerospace Engineering - California State Polytechnic University, Pomona ABOuT Lam has over 18 years of experience as a Project Manager, Project Surveyor and CADD operator. His technical experience includes CAD drafting using CAiCE, MicroStation InRoads, AutoCAD using SoftDesk, creating DTMs for earthwork quantities, road profiling, creating coordinate geometry figures for boundary analysis, computer-aided design and drafting. Lam’s duties include project management and coordination along with field support on multiple projects. He has provided multiple legal descriptions for easements, lot line adjustments and property descriptions and has done extensive title analysis for property establishment and ALTA Surveys. EXPERiENCE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ANAHEIM, CA As Survey Project Manager, Lam was responsible for construction surveying services required for the improvements of the State College Boulevard Corridor at Ball Road. Description of work included right-of-way engineering, preparation of legal descriptions and plat maps and coordination of field survey. Improvements to this intersection included reconstructed raised median islands, landscape improvements, off-site reconstruction, and modified traffic signal. Scope of services includes preparation of conceptual design and precise alignments, topographic mapping, environmental assessment, traffic signal design, street lighting, landscape and irrigation design, pavement investigations final design, and construction documents. RESERVOIR PLANT 19A IMPROVEMENTShEACOCk BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT MORENO VALLEY, CA As the Project Manager, Lam was responsible for Construction Surveying Services for the replacement of the existing Heacock Bridge. The City of Moreno Valley is replacing the two-lane Heacock Street Bridge, which crosses over the Perris Valley Storm Drain (PVSD) Lateral “A.” The Project area is generally located south of State Route 60 and is adjacent to the east side of March Air Reserve Base (MARB), in the southeast portion of the City of Moreno Valley, in Riverside County, California. The Project is part of an ongoing regional effort to improve circulation around MARB and March Joint Powers Authority facilities. SR-60 NASON STREET OVERCROSSING BRIDGE PROJECT MORENO VALLEY, CA As the Project Manager, Lam was responsible for provided field re-establishment of monumentation along the Caltrans Right of Way on this project. The overall purpose of the project is to provide operational improvements to facilitate traffic movement at and near the SR-60/Nason Street interchange, alleviate existing traffic congestion, increase storage capacity at the SR-60/Nason Street intersection, and to address the existing roadway and bridge deficiencies. The project is needed to improve safety, to bring the roadway and bridge features up to current standards, and to provide acceptable levels of service along the facility. Section 3.2.5: Experience and Qualifications 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite 814 Anaheim, CA. 92805 RFQ#20-06 for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements the City of Hermosa Beach 41 Potholing Chris Loera Chief Operating Officer (310) 713-7711 14280 Euclid Avenue Chino, CA. 91710 C-BELOW Subsurface Imaging offers professional locating and mapping services throughout Southern California. Their highly experienced technicians utilize the most advanced equipment in the industry to gather information for any project. Accurate information is vital in planning and can prevent costly delays from damages caused by cutting, coring, drilling or digging in areas congested by unseen hazards in concrete, masonry and underground. ChRiS LOERA CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER / PROJECT MANAGER quALiFiCATiONS CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION - East Los Angeles Skills Center REGISTERED LEVEL III - Ground Penetrating Radar Technician REGISTERED LEVEL III - Utility Locator ABOuT Chris Loera plans, organizes, directs and controls the activities of the Operations Department at C Below. He is responsible for the performance of all department functions including Research and Development, Material Management, Order Services and Engineering and Surveying. He is knowledgeable and experienced with Auto CAD, Civil 3D, SolidWorks 3D, Micro Station, InRoads Suite, and Service CEO industry software, along with many others. He has worked directly on many POLB and POLA projects, and with over 15 years of experience in the industry, Chris is proposed as a well qualified locating quality assurance specialist. EXPERiENCE RANChO LOS AMIGOS NATIONAL REhABILITATION CENTER DOWNEY, CA Chris performed oversite of all utility investigation and operations of the entire campus as Vice President of operations. The project services requirements included utility locating with use of GPR and Electromagnetic locating. Chris also performed site surveying, CAD work, and Potholing on the project. PORT OF LONG BEACh (ON-CALL)COLE AVENUE STORM DRAIN UTILITy INVESITGATION RIVERSIDE, CA Chris supervised all operations to assure they were conducted and completed as directed by the City of Riverside. Project work services included Utility locating via GPR, Electromagnetic locating, ram rod locating, potholing via vacuum excavation, surveying and AutoCAD work, and CCTV Pipe Inspection. DURFEE AVENUE POThOLING PROJECT PICO RIVERA, CA Chris supervised all operations in order to achieve the highest quality control and accuracy on Durfee Avenue for the City of Pico Rivera. Services included vacuum excavations of fifty (50) locations as directed by the City. NORTh SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT BEVERLY HILLS, CA The Santa Monica Boulevard Reconstruction Project was approved by the City Council to involve design reconstruction to the roadway and upgrading the century-old drainage system. C Below was contracted to clear and mark out existing utilities for multiple utility upgrade alignments in the road. The crews worked on the street, performing their own Traffic Control during rush hour traffic and weekends to complete the investigation and to accommodate the Cities’ traffic congestion. Over 120 pothole locations were performed, including the potholing of ramp footings that were excavated during the reconstruction. C Below’s CCTV crews also used the robotic camera to video approximately 1,260 linear ft. of storm drain lines in multiple locations. C Below’s final reporting was sent to our client in the form of a CCTV video report, and detailed pothole report. This was a large and complex project that was completed quickly in 1 month. RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3 Required Forms 6.3.1 Certification of Proposal RFQ #: _________ The undersigned hereby submits its proposal and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFQ). 1.Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Proposal, Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. 2.By submitting the response to this request, Proposer agrees, if selected to furnish services to the City in accordance with this RFQ. 3.Proposer has carefully reviewed its proposal and understands and agrees that the City is not responsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the Proposer and that the Proposer is responsible for them. 4.It is understood and agreed that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals and to waive any informality or irregularity in any proposal received by the City. 5.The proposal response includes all of the commentary, figures and data required by the Request for Proposal 6. The proposal shall be valid for 90 days from the date of submittal. 7.Proposer acknowledges that the City may issue addendums related to this RFQ and that the proposer has reviewed the following addendums which have been issued: Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ 8. Proposer further acknowledges the provisions of any addendums issued have been incorporated into their proposal. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 31 34 Onward Engineering Majdi Ataya, PE President 20-06 Majdi Ataya, PE President RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit RFQ #: _________ The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.This proposal is not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation. 2. This proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham. 3.I have not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Proposer to put in a false or sham proposal and I have not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any other Proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal or to refrain from submitting to this RFQ. 4.I have not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the proposal price or to secure any advantage against the City of Hermosa Beach or of anyone interested in the proposed contract. 5. All statements contained in the Proposal and related documents are true. 6.I have not directly or indirectly submitted the proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any person, corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, RFQ depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. 7.I have not entered into any arrangement or agreement with any City of Hermosa Beach public officer in connection with this proposal. 8.I understand collusive bidding is a violation of State and Federal law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 32 34 20-06 Majdi Ataya, PE President RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements RFQ #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with the City’s insurance requirements contained within this RFQ. The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the insurance requirements as specified in the Request for Proposal. 2.If selected, proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 33 34 20-06 Majdi Ataya, PE President RFQ 20-06 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement RFQ #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City’s Professional Services Agreement. Proposers should identify and/or indicate any exceptions to the Sample Professional Services Agreement included in Section 6.2. The City Attorney or their designee retains the discretion to accept or reject proposed exceptions or modifications to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the conditions specified in the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement. 2.Proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein with exceptions noted as follows: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 34 34 20-06 Majdi Ataya, PE President Onward Engineering agrees to all of the terms and conditions as required by the City of Hermosa Beach's RFP with no exceptions. November 19 , 2020 Submitted By: TAIT & Associates , Inc. 701 Parkcenter Drive Santa Ana, CA 714-560 -8200 www.tait.com RFQ N O . 20-0 6 : O N -C ALL E NGINEERING D ESIGN S ERVICES FOR S TREET I MPROVEMENT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Submitted To: City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk Office Attn: Romany Basilyous 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach CA, 90254 Page | 1 COVER LETTER November 19, 2020 City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk Office Attn: Romany Basilyous 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach CA, 90254 RE: Request for Qualifications (RFQ) #20-06, On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvement Dear Mr. Basilyous, TAIT & Associates, Inc. (TAIT) is pleased to submit the enclosed Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) in response to the City of Hermosa Beach’s (City) RFQ for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvement). TAIT at a Glance. At TAIT, we have provided innovative engineering solutions to our clients for more than 56 years, with local headquarters right here in Santa Ana, CA. We understand that public projects have their own specific issues, and with 200 associates, we have the right blend of professional engineers, architects, surveyors, environmental assessors, and construction personnel with the experience necessary to address critical and big picture concerns. Since TAIT was founded in 1964 in Orange County, we have built mature relationships with state and local agencies throughout Southern California, and consistently create successful partnerships with the agencies for which we work. Expertise and Experience. TAIT’s experienced personnel have expertise in the many facets of civil engineering, planning, and design services including: roadway design, drainage, water quality, surveying, mapping, water, and waste water, utilities site development, and Phase I and II environmental assessments. We have extensive relevant design experience, including recent projects such as the City of Fullerton Jacaranda Neighborhood Rehabilitation, City of Diamond Bar Bonita Canyon & Ford Road Resurfacing and Area 6 Slurry Seal and Overlay, City of Lake Forest Dimension Drive, Civic Center Drive and Portola Parkway Rehabilitation, City of Irvine Campus Drive Roadway Improvement, to name a few. Recently, TAIT has been selected by the City of Hermosa Beach to provide On-Call Design Services for Utilities (Sewer and Storm Drain) and the City of Santa Ana Public Works Division and Water Division to provide On-Call Civil Engineering Services to the City. We are a selected consultant to provide On-Call Civil Engineering Services to the County of Orange—OC Public Works, OC Facilities, OC Parks, and the Orange County Sheriff Department—The Orange County Sanitation District, Cities of Newport Beach, Lake Forest, Irvine, Lake Elsinore, and Mission Viejo, as well as providing On-call Plan Check Services to OCPW, among other agencies. Project Team. TAIT has carefully analyzed and hand selected our proposed team for this on-call contract in order to provide the best services to the City. The leadership includes Jacob Vandervis, PE, QSD/P who is the Chief Operations Officer, will be the Principal-in-Charge/Quality Assurance and Quality Control Manager. He is also a certified QSD/P and is the best candidate to review the design documents for the City to ensure they are to the standards required and free of error prior to submittal to the City. Page | 2 David Sloan, PE, Vice President and Director of Engineering for TAIT will serve as Project Manager for the City’s projects. David’s career has been rooted exclusively in the public sector. His background and experience with local federally funded public works projects will be invaluable to the City. He will be accompanied by Project Engineers Bart Mink, PE, and Chris Engelbach, EIT. In addition to the noted Key Staff, TAIT boasts a wide array of 200 associates including Engineers, Architects, Surveyors, Storm Water Practitioners, Geologists, Contractor’s, and quality design engineers. The City can be assured that the necessary support and availability of staff will be provided on each contract that is assigned to us. For our as-needed sub-consultants, we’ve teamed with tried and true partners who have worked with TAIT on numerous projects, including GMU for Geotechnical and Chambers Environmental. Scope of Work. It is understood that this engineering proposal is for an on-call contract that includes roadway engineering projects including analysis, environmental, rehabilitation and or reconstruction of the City’s roadway network based on the recently adopted pavement management program. Our team has been carefully structured to ensure the City has full service analysis and design capabilities from initial scoping, pavement analysis, environmental review (as needed), value engineering and conformance to City’s guidelines, and the preparation and management of the design and construction of the roadway improvement projects. Given the diverse nature of our project team, we also have in-house capabilities for auxiliary roadway improvement including drainage, water quality, water and sewer system, as well as any necessary architectural and mapping needs. TAIT’s noted diverse staffing and background in multifaceted projects are ideally suited for the City’s wide range of anticipated needs and projects. Upon issuance of an RFP, TAIT will actively review the project requirements and will provide a project specific proposal for the City’s consideration. Commitment to Service. We aim to act as an extension of the City’s staff and place an emphasis on Customer Service which has been and will remain one of TAIT’s Corporate Goals “To Completely Satisfy our Customers”. Jacob Vandervis is the authorized main point of contact for TAIT’s services and can be reached in our Santa Ana office at phone number 714-560-8200 ext. 677, email jacobv@tait.com, and address 701 Parkcenter Drive, Santa Ana, CA, where the contract will be managed. We thank you for this opportunity to submit our qualifications and look forward to further discussing with you our capabilities and commitment to working with the City of Hermosa Beach. Very truly yours, TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC. Jacob Vandervis, P.E. Chief Operations Officer and Vice President TAIT’s legal name is Tait & Associates, Inc., and we are a California Corporation (C0495510) headquartered at 701 Parkcenter Drive in the city of Santa Ana, CA. TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 3 FIRM PROFILE TAIT is a Southern California based, family owned engineering firm founded by Dr. Kenneth E. Tait, P.E., established in 1964, and incorporated in the State of California. TAIT began as a design consulting engineering and land surveying firm dedicated to providing a range of quality services to our clients. In the past 56 years, TAIT has grown to have 9 offices throughout the Western United States, namely our headquarter office in Santa Ana and regional offices in San Diego, San Luis Obispo, Sacramento, Norco, Boise, Denver, Atlanta, and Dallas. We have approximately 200 associates who work together as a team to provide quality design services throughout the Western United States. Each project presents new challenges, and we use them as an opportunity to learn something new and apply that knowledge to future projects. Whether it is a new technical approach, a better management system, or simply improving our communication with clients, the end result is always improved service while strengthening our existing relationships with our clients. Our goal is to determine our client’s needs while acting as an extension of their staff. Our prime objective is to provide the highest quality professional and technical services in a responsive, cost effective, timely, and personalized manner. Firm Capabilities TAIT’s multi-disciplined firm offers a full array of consulting services to public agencies and private development clients. More specifically, we offer project management, civil engineering, surveying, planning, entitlement, right of way engineering, and environmental investigation and remediation services. Within the Engineering Group, our in-house design and management services include: ✓ Roadway analysis and design (rehabilitation and new construction) ✓ Design Survey and Mapping Services ✓ Public Storm Drain Rehabilitation, and New Construction ✓ Hydrologic Calculations & Analysis ✓ Water Quality Design & Review (LID Plan, SWPPP, etc.) ✓ Preparation of Plan, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) ✓ Sewer and Water System Design ✓ Structural Design & Architectural Services ✓ Public Improvements and Development Plan Checking ✓ Construction Management, Inspection & Surveying Services ✓ Coordination with other Agencies A key component of TAIT’s strength is based upon our ability to focus on solutions that are not only cost-effective, but are also constructible. We have specific expertise in public infrastructure development, water quality management plans, best management practices design, storm drain design, and environmental management. We also understand the tight time and money constraints under which our clients frequently operate, and strive to provide unique solutions that allow our client’s projects to be completed on time and within budget. Our Corporate Headquarters—Santa Ana, CA TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 4 Recent Relevant Experience Some of the most recent projects that we are under contract for or have recently completed are: ✓ Irvine Campus Drive Pavement Rehabilitation, City of Irvine (Roadway Rehab & Reconst.) ✓ Quadrant III Water Line Replacement, City of Chino (Water Distribution) ✓ Street Overlay, Alley Reconst. & Cerritos Widening, City of Stanton (Roadway Rehab & Reconst.) ✓ Portola Parkway Resurfacing Project, City of Lake Forest (Roadway Resurfacing) ✓ FY13/14 Major Street Rehabilitation, City of Pomona (Arterial Rehabilitation) ✓ SR 395 Regional Storm Drain Improvements, City of Victorville (H&H & Storm Drain) ✓ Reagan & Peterson Park Parking Lot Rehabilitation, City of Diamond Bar (Parks & Recreation) ✓ Library of the Canyons, OC Public Library (Site Design/Facilities) ✓ OC Sheriff Headquarters Security Upgrades, OC Sheriff Department (Site Design/Facilities) ✓ OCACF Facility Design, Survey, & Construction Staking, OC Animal Care (Site Design/Facilities) ✓ Water Main Replacement Design Build Projects, Glendale Water & Power (Water Distribution) ✓ Water Main Replacement Design Build Projects, Golden State Water District(Water Distribution) ✓ Harbor Boulevard Street Reconfiguration, City of Garden Grove (Roadway Utilities) ✓ A Town Street Widening & Sewer Improvements, City of Anaheim (Sewer & Roadway) ✓ Tustin Metrolink Facility Redevelopment, OCTA (Transportation Facility) ✓ On-Call Plan Checking Services, Orange County Public Works (Plan Checking) ✓ Irvine USD Site Topography and Campus Expansion, City of Irvine (Design & Survey) ✓ Irvine City Hall UST Replacement, City of Irvine (Site Design, Survey & Environmental) ✓ Bristol St & Civic Center Dr. WQ Improvements, City of Santa Ana (Water Quality) ✓ Citywide Comprehensive Drainage Studies, City of Diamond Bar (H&H & Storm Drain) ✓ Drainage Improvement Project Phase 1 & 2, City of Diamond Bar (H&H & Storm Drain) ✓ Development Plans Drainage Analysis & Design, City of Diamond Bar (H&H & Storm Drain ✓ Pier F-G Sewer Line Improvement, Port of Long Beach (Sewer & Roadway) ✓ Newport Heights Alley & Sewer Replacement, City of Newport Beach (Sewer & Alley) Company Location & Other Facts As mentioned in our cover letter, Jacob Vandervis is the authorized main point of contact for TAIT & Associate’s services and can be reached in our Santa Ana office at phone number 714-560-8200 ext. 677, fax number 714-560-8233, email jacobv@tait.com, and address 701 Park Center Drive, Santa Ana, CA, where the contract will be managed. TAIT’s Federal Employer I.D. Number is 95-2395818, and we have never had any failures or refusals to complete a contract. TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 5 Sub-Consultant Profiles GMU Primary Point of Contact Roger Schlierkamp 23241 Arroyo Vista, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Phone: 949-546-0017 Fax: 949-888-1380 Reschlierkamp@gmugeo.com Firm Organization/Ownership GMU Geotechnical, Inc. GMU Geotechnical, Inc. is a-Corporation. Federal Employer ID Number 33-0359134 Number of Years in Business GMU has provided geotechnical services for 52 years Established in 1967, GMU Pavement Engineering (GMU) has built a long reputation as a trusted consultant for some of the most challenging and recognizable projects located in Southern California. GMU approaches each project with the objective of developing innovative geotechnical and pavement engineering solutions. We make it a personal goal to find cost-effective and implementable solutions. Client history and retention attest to GMU’s commitment to service excellence. GMU’s 50 years of service excellence has been recognized by over 50 awards and special recognition, while also providing on-time/on-budget performance. Acknowledgement of our achievements has come from national organizations such as CELSOC to regional ones such as CalGeo and local chapters of ASCE. We are continually ranked by the County of Orange as one of the top geotechnical and pavement consulting firms in Orange County. Located in Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, GMU’s office houses a 42-person team of highly qualified professional engineers, geologists, and engineering technicians with experience in all phases of pavement engineering, geotechnical engineering, engineering geology, and materials testing. GMU’s staff includes: • 8 professional and geotechnical engineers licensed in California • 4 certified engineering geologists licensed in California • Engineering technicians and registered special inspectors with an average of 15 to 25+ years of experience Engineering technicians hold certifications from Caltrans, American Concrete Institute (ACI), International Code Council (ICC), American Welding Society (AWS), and County of Orange. GMU’s in- house laboratory is approved by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), AASHTO Materials Reference Lab (AMRL), the County of Orange, and other public agencies. TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 6 CHAMBERS GROUP – ENVIRONMENTAL Primary Point of Contact Lisa Louie 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 750, Santa Ana, CA 92707 Phone: 949-261-5414 Fax: 866-261-3100 llouie@chambersgroupinc.com Firm Organization/Ownership Chambers Group, Inc. Chambers Group is an S-Corporation and owned by Chambers Group, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Trust Federal Employer ID Number 33-0283470 Number of Years in Business Chambers Group has provided environmental consulting services for 41 years Incorporated in the State of California, May 25, 1979 Celebrating 40 years of providing environmental consulting services, Chambers Group’s corporate headquarters is in Santa Ana with regional offices in Glendale, San Diego, and Riverside, California. Chambers Group, a SBE is an Employee-Owned S-Corporation, incorporated May 25, 1979. Chambers Group has 56 active employees across a range of technical fields and supporting roles. Services include: • CEQA and NEPA compliance • Biological surveys and agency consultations • Biological, Cultural, and Marine and Aquatic resources • Construction mitigation monitoring • Habitat restoration and revegetation • Geographic Information Systems (GIS) • Environmental planning and permitting Chambers Group is known for providing technically proficient experts who are exceptionally responsive and communicative with our clients. Chambers Group has built this reputation on decades of experience preparing appropriate CEQA and NEPA documents for complex projects; preparing required resource agency permit applications, preparing mitigation plans; and monitoring construction activities for compliance. Conducting environmental analyses and documentation for development projects, including complex and sensitive projects, is Chambers Group’s specialty. They have built this reputation on decades of experience preparing appropriate CEQA and NEPA documents and technical studies. Chambers Group’s staff has ongoing relationships with many State and local agencies, and the firm’s 40-year presence in California has provided an understanding of evolving environmental legislation and meeting the stringent requirements of federal, State, and local regulatory agencies. Their team of technical experts will provide scientific objectivity, environmental expertise, defensible environmental analysis, and technical documentation to support our clients in meeting target strategic and long-range planning and community development goals. TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 7 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH TO SCOPE OF WORK Statement of Project Understanding Public Works engineering contracts require careful planning, effective communication, and precise execution in order to avoid costly contract change orders or delays during the construction phase. As it relates to this contract, the City of Hermosa Beach is seeking a qualified roadway engineering civil design firm to provide on-call engineering support services on a broad range of engineering contracts. As a result, it is understood that multiple RFPs will be issued for upcoming projects based on the City’s needs. TAIT’s broad background in public works engineering (Road/Storm/Water/Sewer/Architectural) allows us to quickly support and fulfil on-call contract needs such as this one. As is the case with all on-call contracts, it is critical that the selected consultant have a strong project management plan or organize the project approach on each assignment. In an effort to ensure consistent and excellent services, TAIT will imply our proven 5 step project management protocol (UNDERSTAND→ASSIGN→ PLAN→EXECUTE→QA/QC) on each assigned project. The individual steps are described below: STEP 1 → UNDERSTAND: Understanding the City’s On-Call Needs First, to best understand the projects specifics needs, we focus on what the City’s overall needs are for this on-call contract as well as future individual design contracts that will be required as part of this Contract. Based on our review of the City’s RFQ, the following is our understanding of the City needs on this and future projects as compared to TAITs capabilities: City of Hermosa Beach Needs: The TAIT Team Has: …a Consultant to design local, collector, and arterial roadway improvement projects ranging from maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction. Further, the consultant must have experience in recommending rehabilitation approaches and auxiliary improvements required to best support the City on each Contact. …Over 56 years of extensive local public works design experience, and understands the needs for pavement engineering and design. Our team is exceptionally suited for the City on this contract due to our broad background and strong bench of TAIT and Sub-Consultant team members focused on pavement and roadway engineering. … a Consultant with experience utilizing local, State, and Federal grant moneys to fund the proposed design and/or construction on the roadway improvement projects. . …has experience working with all ranges of project funding including federally funded roadway improvement projects and the associated E-76 application and approval process. Regardless of the size of project, we have the experience to Support the City. …a consultant to prepare detailed and accurate roadway PS&E. …successfully completed multiple recent local and federally funded street PS&E design contracts as part of similar on-call contracts …a consultant who can maintain the proposed project schedule. … the staffing necessary to allocate the required resources to meet and exceed the City’s scheduling needs TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 8 Understanding the City’s Project Needs In addition to the City’s on-call needs, it is critical that the TAIT team take the time to understand each of the City’s assigned on-call RFP or Contracts. Upon issuance of each RFP, TAIT will conduct a review of the project limits, request and conduct a cursory review of any available records, and discuss the project with the City to ensure we have a full understanding of the City’s needs and goals on the contract. Organizational Chart STEP 2 → ASSIGN: Upon confirmation of the City’s needs and goals on a project, TAIT will carefully review the staffing needs and staff assignments for each project in order to achieve the City’s goals. Of notable importance in our approach is to assign a project-specific Project Manager who will best meet the City’s needs for the particular project assignment, and a Project Engineer who will assist and support from project inception to completion. We have further teamed with expert sub-consultants as part of this on-call proposal who have worked extensively with TAIT over the past years to successfully support local southern California agencies on similar On-Call Contracts. GMU Geotechnical will support this contract with expert pavement analysis, and Chambers Group will support this contract on any CEQA/NEPA reviews that will be required. The chart below summarizes our key personnel and their expertise and positions for this contract. Principal/QA/QC Manager Jacob Vandervis, PE, QSD/P Sub-Consultants GMU, Geotechnical Chambers, Environmental TAIT Engineering, Design & Survey Support Staff Local Project Engineers @ Santa Ana office: 7 Engineers Local Design Engineers @ Santa Ana office: 8 Engineers TAIT Assigned Roadway Project Engineers Bart Mink, PE Chris Engelbach, EIT Lead Project Manager David Sloan, PE TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 9 Approach to Work Program (Required and Optional Tasks) STEP 3 → PLAN (SCOPE OF WORK): Upon our understanding of the project (Step 1) and assignment of key project personnel (Step 2) We will prepare and submit a clear and concise scope of work, project schedule, and fee proposal that includes all necessary tasks to successfully complete each requested contracts. Key considerations in the planning phase will include the funding source (local/state/federal) and associated permitting/ documentation requirements, stakeholder requirements/needs, level of design detail desired by the City (plan/plan & profile), storm water quality requirements and anticipated impacts, coordination and meeting needs, and the overall scheduling needs. In order to provide a summary of anticipated tasks on each contract, the following outline scope of work has been provided to the City in an effort to depict and assure our understanding and experience with on-call roadway engineering contracts. The outline below only includes the titles of typical tasks, however, each proposal received from TAIT will include detailed descriptions of each task outlining our proposed scope and approach. SAMPLE OUTLINE SCOPE OF WORK Phase 1: Base/Preliminary Data Review 1.1: Preliminary Photographs 1.2: Project Base Data and Design Field Review 1.3: Topographic Survey and Base mapping (Including Control/Aerial/Boundary) 1.4: Utility Coordination and Notices 1.5: Utilities Potholing (As Needed) 1.6: Outside Agency Coordination & Approvals (Federal/Rail/Utility/Adjacent Agencies) Phase 2: Pavement Analysis, Preliminary Engineering (30%), & Reccomendations 2.1: Geotechnical/Pavement Investigation (GMU Geotechnical Sub-Consultant Task) 2.2: Preliminary Roadway/Geometric Study & Impact Review/Pricing [larger roadways] 2.3: Pavement Design Scenario Pricing and Recommendations [rehab/standard projects] 2.4: Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (BMP Design & Recommendations) 2.5: Preliminary Roadway Hydraulic Studies & Recommendations 2.6: Colored Improvement Renderings (for council/commission reviews – as needed) Phase 3: Environmental Review (Chambers Group Sub-Consultant Task): 3.1: Categorical Exclusion (CE) [Typical level of environmental support needed] 3.2: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) [if not CE Project] 3.3: Further Environmental Study & Investigation (As Needed) TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 10 Phase 4: Design Plans, Specifications, and Estimates 4.1: Construction Drawings (60%, 90%, & 100% Typical) 4.1.1 – Title Sheet 4.1.2 – Typical Cross Sections/Details 4.1.3 – Utility Composite Plan (Arterial/Major Projects) 4.1.4 – Roadway Improvement Plans (Plan or Plan & Profile Base on Needs) 4.1.5 – Drainage Improvement Plans (As Needed – Plan & Profile) 4.1.6 – Irrigation and Landscape Plans (As Needed Sub Task – Arterials) 4.1.7 – Traffic Signal Plans (As Needed Sub Task) 4.1.8 – Signing & Striping Plans 4.1.9 – Traffic Control & Staging Plans 4.1.10 – Design Cross Sections (25’ O.C. – Arterials/Profile Designs) 4.2: Project Specifications 4.3: Quantities and Cost Estimates 4.4: Mylar Routing & Final Signatures Phase 5: Right-of-Way Engineering (ROW) and Exhibits (As Needed( 5.1: Right-of-Way Requirements Determination 5.2: Right-of-Way Exhibits & Legal Descriptions (TCE or Encroachments) 5.3: Right of Way Acquisition Assistance (As-Needed Sub Consultant Task) Phase 6: Agency Permitting & Approvals 6.1 – Agency Coordination & Approvals (Adjacent City’s) 6.2 – County Flood Control Permitting (Revised lateral/CB on Roadways) 6.3 – Caltrans Encroachment Permit & Documentation (TC & Construction Permits) 6.4 – Railroad Encroachment Permit & Agreements (TC & Construction Permits) 6.5 – Federal Funding Assistance (E-76 Documentation & Approvals) 6.6 – Utility Agency Permitting/Approvals (Widening Related Relocations) TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 11 Phase 7: Meetings, Presentations and Exhibits 7.1 – Project Team Meetings and Management 7.2 – Community Stakeholder Meetings (As Needed) 7.3 – Commission & Council Presentations (AS Needed) Phase 8 Construction Engineering 8.1 – Bidding Assistance & Review 8.2 – Pre-Construction Meeting 8.3 – RFI – Request for Information 8.4 – Change Order Analysis 8.5 – Submittal Review 8.6 – Prepare As-Built Plan Roles and Responsibilities for City Staff and Additional Services The proposed TAIT project team is capable of handling the full scope of services requested in the RFQ and no exceptions are taken. With the decades of local, relevant project experience, we are confident in our selected team’s ability to service the City on this contract. Key sub-consultants for relevant areas of work have been listed and highlighted in the SOQ with relevant firm bios and key team member resumes. It is understood that based on the final scope of work on each project, additional sub- consultants may be required. Such sub-consultant work will be identified in the project understanding and assignment stages of our project management protocol listed above. Only key sub-consultants have been listed in this SOQ, however, TAIT has long standing working relationships with the following sub- consultants who will also be requested for proposals on relevant projects. Additional sub-consultant work that may be required on a contract include: • CDPC: Landscape Architect (for plant/site work or roadway work impacting medians) • TJW: Traffic Engineer (if City requests traffic control plans or signal improvements are impacted • BTL: GPR Investigation/Utility Potholing/CCTV Inspections (if data is not provided by the City) Resources and assistance that is expected from the City on the assigned contracts are: • City to provide available public roadway, utility, and right of way records • City to provide Pavement Management Plans and supporting modeling and GIS data • City to provide title report/Right of Way for site work (unless requested in the scope from consultant) Prior to submittal of each proposal, TAIT will coordinate with City staff on any additional items to ensure roles and responsibilities on each job are made clear at the start of the project. TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 12 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN TAIT’s project management plans is centered on our 5-step project management protocol which has been described in the previous section. A continuation of the 5-step protocol is as follows: STEP 4 → EXECUTE: Upon selection of TAIT on the assigned contract and issuance of the Notice to Proceed, TAIT will actively and effectively execute the scope of work for each assign contract. Our assigned project manager will stay in constant contact with the City and will remain available and responsive to the City’s needs through the life of this on-call contract. At the heart of each relationship and team member, is effective communication of the roles & responsibilities, quality requirements and scheduling needs. As part of TAIT’s approach to executing a project under this on-call contract, the selected Project Manager will work on developing a Project Management Plan (PMP) specific to the project. This PMP will layout: ✓ Project tasks. ✓ Assign team members to the task. ✓ Develop a schedule. ✓ List deliverables for each task. ✓ List budget for each task. The team assigned to the project will diligently follow the PMP to ensure that deadlines and budgets are met, along with performing the best quality of work. The Project Manager will continuously be monitoring the progress of each task and the status of the budget to ensure that each task is accomplished in a timely manner and within the budget. Lastly, a key component for a successful project is communication. TAIT will maintain communication with the City, each internal team members and sub-consultants as applicable to the project, to ensure coordination efforts and completion of task is accomplish in a smooth and timely manner. Communications Approach TAIT has built a reputation of successfully managing projects from concept to completion, with both big company expertise and small company culture dedicated to customer service. We know when to look for feedback from our clients and other approving agencies, especially when budget constraints restrict a project’s direction. When multiple solutions or options are available, a request for input/feedback along with our recommended alternative is presented to our clients ensure that our client’s sometimes limited resources and time is efficiently utilized. STEP 5 → QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM: An important feature of our design process is our Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Program. TAIT has established clearly defined quality control and quality assurance protocols set in place in the office. As part of our scope of services and fee proposal, we have set aside time to ensure that quality control is incorporated in to the contract. The following page has been provided to summarize TAIT’s QA/QC program and approach: TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program: As noted previously, an important feature of our design process is our Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Program. TAIT has established clearly defined quality control and quality assurance protocols set in place in the office. As part of our scope of services and fee proposal, we have set aside time to ensure that quality control is incorporated in to the contract. TAIT assigns a QA/QC Manager to each project to ensure reviews occur prior to making submittals to the reviewing agency and the City is provided a quality design. Mr. Jacob Vandervis, P.E. has been assigned to oversee TAIT’s QA/QC Program for this on-call contract. TAIT’s QA/QC Program focuses on the following four primary objectives: • To ensure that a quality design has been provided by following our in-house design checklists • To verify that different design disciplines have been coordinated • To verify that the proposed improvements are constructible, and • To verify that a cost-effective analysis approach was followed in achieving the client’s specific project goals and objectives. TAIT utilizes a Total Quality Management approach. - TAIT’s philosophy is that quality control begins at day one and does not end until the project is completed. Quality Control is the responsibility of each and every team member. - It includes the selection of project team members who have demonstrated the ability to understand and apply the project objectives to achieve a specific goal. It requires continuous communications between all parties, and it includes self-checks during design and development of the project. TAIT has developed internal design checklists. - Design checklists are used by our design team members as a component of our firm’s design process and not solely part of the QC process. Timely Quality Control Reviews are provided. - Before plans are submitted to outside parties, TAIT’s QA/QC Manager or his designated QC team member conducts a thorough review to verify the quality, constructability and completeness of the submittal. A typical TAIT QA/QC Program includes the following steps: • Project Manager (PM) Transmits Design Documents/Reports to the QA/QC Manager - PM initiates the QC process as agreed upon project milestones. • QA/QC Manager conducts initial review - The QA/QC Manager reviews the submittal with the PM to obtain project information and conducts a limited review on the submittal’s completeness. • Review of the Submittal – The submittal is reviewed using TAIT’s internal checklists. Necessary corrections are identified on the submittal which is returned to the PM. • PM to Addresses QC Comments - The QA/QC Manager and PM review the QC comments to set a course of action. Any proposed Value Engineering (VE) measures are reviewed to determine the appropriate next step (i.e.: implement the VE measure, review the VE measure with the City, or conduct additional analysis to determine the feasibility and potential cost savings). The reviewed submitted is then returned to the design team, who carefully makes corrections on plans, calculations and reports as needed. PM finalizes Design Documents/Reports for Submittal to the Agency - The PM meets with the design team to monitor progress and verify incorporation of the QC comments into the design documents. Deviations from the QC comment are reviewed for acceptance. TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 14 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Summary of Relevant Projects ON-CALL ENGINEERING CONTRACTS Ex: Orange County Public Works—On-Call Land Planning and Engineering Services County of Orange, CA Since 2011, TAIT & Associates, Inc. (TAIT) was retained by the County of Orange to provide On-call Land Planning and Engineering Services. TAIT also assists OCPW - OC Planned Communities in the review of development applications for new planned communities in South County, and in the evaluation of County owned properties for redevelopment opportunities. Other On-Call Engineering Contracts • On-Call Engineering, City of Santa Ana Public Works & Water • On-Call Engineering, City, County, & Port of San Diego • On-Call Engineering, City of Newport Beach • On-Call Engineering, City of Lake Forest • On-Call Engineering, City of Irvine • On-Call Engineering, Port of Long Beach • On-Call Engineering, Orange County Sanitation District • On-Call Surveying, SOCCCD • On-Call Engineering, City of Lake Elsinore • On-Call Engineering, City of Mission Viejo Street Projects JACARANDA NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION & SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT Fullerton, CA TAIT was selected by the City of Fullerton to provide civil engineering services for the Jacaranda Neighborhood Pavement Rehabilitation and Sewer Main Replacement Project. The project was located in a historic neighborhood in the City of Fullerton that included over a mile of residential roadway rehabilitation and 2,700 linear feet of sewer main replacement within the neighborhood surrounding Jacaranda Place from the western cul-de-sac to Malden Avenue. In addition to roadway reconstruction and grind and overlay operations, the roadway component of the project included the removal and replacement of over 1.5 miles of old, deteriorated, and uneven curb and driveways throughout the neighborhood with new variable height curb and gutter in order to engineer and define the roadway drainage conditions within the neighborhood. Due to the historic and unique nature of the neighborhood, the curb heights and flowline were carefully profiled in order to improve the drainage conditions while also joining the existing pavement. Reference Contact: Jose Medina (714) 738-6863 Client: City of Fullerton Construction Cost: $2.4 M Project Dates Design: 2019-2020 Construction: 2020 Project Team: PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM: David Sloan QA/QC: Todd Schmieder PE: Chris Engelbach TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 15 BONITA CANYON AND FORD ROAD RESURFACING PROJECT Newport Beach, CA TAIT was selected by the City of Newport Beach to provide civil engineering, surveying, geotechnical engineering services on the Bonita Canyon and Ford Road Resurfacing Project from Jamboree Road to SR-73. The project limits include a total of 2 miles of arterial roadway rehabilitation on Bonita Canyon/Ford Road which a 6 lane arterial roadway with raised medians and bike lanes extending through the City of Newport Beach. The project includes the design of pavement rehabilitation strategies as well as the identification and replacement of non-ADA compliant curb ramps, sidewalk, replacement of damaged curb and gutter, and the identification and adjustment/protection of utility facilities. Of critical importance on this contract was the design and coordination of the improvements and traffic control within the state of California Right of Way at SR-73. The TAIT team actively coordinated with the City and Caltrans during the review process in order to obtain project approval and permit ahead of the bidding date. Additionally, this contract was complicated due to the steep grades along the project limits. Curb ramps which could not be made ADA compliant were identified during the design review process and memos were submitted to the City in order to justify the final limits of the work. DIMENSION DRIVE, CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, & PORTOLA PARKWAY REHABILITATION PROJECT Lake Forest, CA TAIT was selected by the City of Lake Forest to provide civil engineering and surveying on a citywide arterial design project which included the design of the following three segments: • Dimension Drive from Bake Parkway to Lake Forest Drive • Civic Center Drive from Enterprise way to South End • Portola Parkway at SR-73 Overcrossing (w/in Caltrans R/W) The project encompassed a total of 6,400 linear feet of arterial/collector roadways and included full depth reconstruction of dimension drive and Civil Center drive and a 2” grind and overlay of Portola Parkway within the Caltrans R/W limits. This project required obtaining a Caltrans encroachment permit for both construction and traffic control purposes. As a result, further detail and scrutiny was required on the design to ensure Caltrans acceptance of the traffic control system as well as the overall design materials and elevations. Reference: Patricia Kharazmi, PE 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA (949) 644-3344 PKharazmi@newportbeachca .gov Client: City of Newport Beach Project Dates Design: 2019-2020 Construction: 2020 Construction Cost: $2.5 M Key Staff PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM: David Sloan QA/QC: Todd Schmieder Reference Contact: Taylor Abernathy, PE (949) 461-3490 Client: City of Lake Forest Construction Cost: $3.5 M Project Dates Design: 2018-2019 Construction: 2019-2020 Project Team: PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM: David Sloan QA/QC: Todd Schmieder PE: Chris Engelbach Geotech: GMU Traffic: TJW TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 16 AREA 6 SLURRY SEAL AND OVERLAY PROJECT Diamond Bar, CA TAIT & Associates was selected by the City of Diamond Bar to provide design engineering services for the Citywide Zone 6 Slurry Seal and Overlay Project. The project included the design of an entire neighborhood zone within the City of Diamond Bar which included the field identification, implementation, and design of over 800,000 SF of AC Grind and Overlay, and 1,200,000 SF of Slurry Seal located within the northern limits of the City of Diamond Bar. In addition to the pavement analysis, design, and implementation, TAIT was also responsible for identifying sidewalk, curb and gutter, and curb ramp improvements throughout the neighborhood including the removal and replacement of 19 curb ramps within the steep, curvilinear streets of Diamond Bar. Special attention was paid on this project to the appropriate use and identification of patching areas in order to maximize the City’s budget and to ensure constructability of the project. TAIT worked closely with City staff to identify and isolate areas of concern in order to ensure the City’s benefits were maximized on the job. CAMPUS DRIVE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Irvine, CA TAIT was selected by the City of Irvine to provide civil engineering and surveying on the Campus Drive Rehabilitation Project from Michelson Drive to University Drive. The project limits include a total of 4000 linear feet of arterial roadway rehabilitation and reconstruction on Campus Drive which is a 2 lane arterial roadway with bike lanes extending through the City of Irvine. The project includes the design of pavement rehabilitation strategies as well as the identification and replacement of non-ADA compliant curb ramps, sidewalk, replacement of damaged curb and gutter, reconstruction and re-grading of the low point of the roadway due to flooding and ponding issues, coordination with IRWD and UCI for right of way and wetlands protection, and the identification and adjustment/protection of utility facilities throughout the project limits. Careful attention was paid to the roadway profile which required modification in order to raise the low point of the roadway by more than 6”. Plan and profile for the roadway was re-designed per CA Highway Design Manual standards, and extensive coordination conducted with the City to verify that the pavement replacement scenario is in line with the proposed and revised grades. Reference Contact: John Beshay Associate Engineer (626) 682-3117 Client: City of Diamond Bar Construction Cost: $1.5 M Project Dates Design: Winter/Spring, 2018 Construction: Summer, 2018 Project Team: PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM: David Sloan QA/QC: Todd Schmieder Reference Contact: Darrell Hartman, PE 1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA 92606 (949) 724-7556 dhartman@cityofirvine.org Client: City of Irvine Construction Cost: $2.6 M Project Dates: Design: 2017-2018 Construction: 2018 Project Team: PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM: David Sloan QA/QC: Todd Schmieder PE: Chris Engelbach TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 17 OVERLAY, ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION, AND CERRITOS AVE. WIDENING PROJECT Stanton, CA TAIT & Associates was selected by the City of Stanton to provide roadway and drainage design services on three separate project areas. 1. Cerritos Avenue Widening & Drainage Improvement Project 2. Palais Alley Reconstruction Project 3. Bradford Community and Rutledge Avenue Rehabilitation Project Cerritos avenue widening project required the widening of Cerritos Avenue from Rose Ave to Flower Street which included removal and reconstruction of existing parkway improvements, relocation of power poles, fire hydrant, water meter, and roadway signs, construction of new curb and gutter, curb ramps, and alley approach, and the relocation and construction of a new storm drain catch basin and lateral. The existing storm drain lateral was discovered to be extremely shallow which required special design and consideration for the relocated condition. TAIT checked the capacity and flows of the existing inlets to ensure proposed conditions were not constrained. Palais Alley reconstruction required the full removal of existing AC paved alley surface and construction of a new PCC paved alley surface to ultimate flowline. Design of this alley segment included checking joins at driveways, design of alley approaches, and joining of existing drainage channel/course at the project limits to ensure storm water flows were conveyed adequately. NEWPORT HEIGHTS ALLEY AND SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT Newport Beach, CA TAIT was selected by the City of Newport Beach to provide civil engineering services on Newport Height Alley and Sewer Replacement Projects. The project limits spanned across an entire neighborhood in the City’s coastal community of Newport Heights and include a total of 3+ miles of alley reconstructions as well as the review and repair of existing alley sewer and lateral connections. In order to facilitate the City’s budget and timelines, the design project was split in to three phases which required separate design PS&E for each project. Phase 1 included all sewer main replacements while Phases 2 and 3 included the alley removal and replacements in the neighborhoods. The proposed design includes the preparation of design plan and profile for each alley, prepare of design cross sections at 25’ intervals for review of proposed cross falls, preparation of sewer main replacement and lateral replacement plans, field review of all alley locations to field locate existing utilities, conflicts, and join locations. Reference Contact: Allan Rigg 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA (714) 890-4203 ARigg@ci.stanton.ca.us Client: City of Stanton Construction Cost: $1.3 M Project Dates Design: Jan-May, 2017 Construction: Summer, 2017 Project Team: PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM: David Sloan QA/QC: Todd Schmieder PE: Chris Engelbach Reference Contact: Frank Tran, PE 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA (949) 644-3340 FTran@NewportBeachCa.gov Client: City of Newport Beach Construction Cost: $1.3 M (Sewer) $1.8 M (Alley) Project Dates Design: 2016 (Sewer & Alley) Construction: 2016 (Sewer TBD) 2016-2017 (Alley) Project Team: PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM: David Sloan QA/QC: Todd Schmieder PE: Chris Engelbach PE: Daniela Malott TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 18 PORTOLA PARKWAY RESURFACING PROJECT Lake Forest, CA TAIT was selected by the City of Lake Forest to provide civil engineering, surveying, geotechnical engineering and federal funding assistance services on the Portola Parkway Resurfacing Project from Alton Parkway to El Toro Road. The project limits include a total of 2 miles of arterial roadway rehabilitation on Portola Parkway which a 6 lane arterial roadway with bike lanes extending through the City of Lake Forest. The project includes the design of pavement rehabilitation strategies as well as the identification and replacement of non-ADA compliant curb ramps, sidewalk, replacement of damaged curb and gutter, and the identification and adjustment/protection of utility facilities. This project also included the relocation of an existing median at Portola Parkway and Bake Parkway in order to construct an additional left turn lane. The scope of the reconstruction included design of plan and profiles and design sections as well as the analysis of the existing and proposed traffic signal system to ensure adequate capacity is available in the existing conduits/system. REAGAN & PETERSON PARK PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROJECT Diamond Bar, CA TAIT was hired by the City of Diamond Bar to analyze, design, and provide construction management and inspection services for the expansion of two public park parking lots. The design services included topographic survey, geotechnical investigation, water quality management design, Los Angeles County Flood Control District storm drain permit processing, and the preparation of detailed PS&E for the construction of the park improvements. Design analysis included addition of handicapped parking stalls, design of optimal cross and longitudinal grades and the installation of retaining curbs to optimize the parking stall configuration. Careful attention was required while designing the parking lot expansion in order to ensure full ADA access is provided to the park while avoiding damage or impact to the existing facilities. Design of low flow and high flow diversion systems were required in order to ensure proper drainage for the site. Due to soft subgrade soils, the design also included the analysis and coordination of subgrade stabilization. The final design included the installation of stabilizing geogrids under the crushed base layer which helped provide structural stability for the pavement structure. Reference Contact: Doug Erdman, PE 25550 Commercentre Drive, Suite 100, Lake Forest, CA (949) 282-5233 derdman@lakeforestca.gov Client: City of Lake Forest Construction Cost: $1.5 M Project Dates: Design: 2015-2016 Construction: 2016 Project Team: PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM: David Sloan QA/QC: Todd Schmieder Reference Contact: John Beshay 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA (909) 839-7043 jbeshay@diamondbarca.gov Client: City of Diamond Bar Construction Cost: $575 K Project Dates Design: 2014-2015 Construction: 2015 Project Team: PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM/CM: David Sloan QA/QC: Todd Schmieder TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 19 FY 13/14 MAJOR STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT Pomona, CA TAIT was selected by the City of Pomona to provide major street rehabilitation design services on eight streets located throughout the City. The streets to be rehabilitated include two lane residential streets with on street parking and four-lane divided arterial highways. In addition to the implantation of a pavement rehabilitation program for the 7.4 miles of city streets, the project also includes improvements to pedestrian and bicycle mobility. Class II or Class III bike lanes will be added to the city streets, broken or raised segments of sidewalks and curbs will be replaced, and sidewalk access ramps will be improved to comply with state accessibility regulations. The proposed pavement rehabilitation methodologies on this contract included the use of Cold Central Plant Recycled Asphalt (CCPR-AC), Conventional AC Overlays, ARHM Overlays, and Slurry/Fog Seals. This project also required coordination as warranted with existing utility providers to avoid future utility cuts in the new refurbished streets as well as with SCRAA/Metrolink in order to obtain a railroad crossing encroachment permit for the work proposed within the crossing. HARBOR BOULEVARD WATER MAIN & STREET RECONFIGURATION PROJECT Garden Grove, CA This project included street reconfiguration (approximately 1/3-mile total length), improvements to an existing raised median, a new traffic signal, abandonment of existing 8-inch ACP and 12-inch DIP City water lines, installation of a 800 LF of 16-inch water line, and relocation of SCE and AT&T main distribution service lines. It required the installation of new public storm drains, sewer, and water services to accommodate a future redevelopment project along Harbor Boulevard from Palm Street to Lampson Avenue in the City of Garden Grove. Water line improvements also included new connections to existing City 12-inch and 8-inch water lines and the installation of two new fire hydrants. Engineering services required extensive research, review, and a potholing program for the installation of the new utilities and storm drain improvements within the existing six-lane Harbor Boulevard roadway. TAIT, working with City Water Department, identified a location where the installation of a cut-in valve could be installed to ensure continuous water service to a medical facility during the construction of the water line improvements. Reference Contact: Matthew Pilarz, PE 505 South Garey Avenue Pomona, CA (909) 620-3652 Matt_Pilarz@ci.pomona.ca.us Client: City of Pomona Construction Cost: $5 M Project Dates Design: 2014-2015 Construction: 2016 Project Team: PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM: David Sloan QA/QC: Todd Schmieder Reference Contact: Bill Murray, P.E. 13802 Newhope St Garden Grove, CA (714) 741-5379 wem@zimbra.ci.garden- grove.ca.us Client: City of Garden Grove Construction Cost: $1.4 M Project Dates Design: 2012-2013 Construction: 2013 Project Team: PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM: Todd Schmieder TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 20 STREET WIDENING AND REGIONAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AT SR 395 Victorville, CA TAIT was awarded a contract with the City of Victorville to provide engineering services for a regional storm drain improvement project within State Highway 395. This project lent itself to multiple complexities including the design of a double 8’x7’ RCB crossing a state highway, locating and avoiding multiple existing utilities, obtaining Caltrans permitting and approval, and coordinating between private and public stakeholders to ensure full satisfaction and success of the project. TAIT successfully designed this project for the City of Victorville and stayed active on the contract through the successful construction of the regional storm drain facilities. The design phase included active coordination with stake holders, field surveying, preparation of an ALTA survey for the affected properties, preparation of a hydrology study, preparation of Caltrans construction plans, and the preparation of engineers cost estimates and specifications. The final construction of the facility included jacking and boring 280’ of a double 7x8 RCB under SR 395, Construction of open trench double 7x8 RCB connectors at both ends of the system, and the construction of RCP stub outs for future connection to the drainage system. A-TOWN STREET WIDENING AND SEWER CAPACITY PROJECT Anaheim, CA TAIT has worked closely with the City of Anaheim’s Planning, Public Works, and Construction Departments to process plans for the proposed public infrastructure improvements within the City’s Platinum Triangle Development District. Engineering services included design of capacity enhancements for sewer lines in Katella Avenue, Gene Autry Way and Santa Cruz Road (approximately 2 miles on new sewer). TAIT also provided design plans for street widening to Katella Avenue, State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way (approximately one-mile total length) including a new raised landscape median in Katella Avenue, and the reconstruction of a City Changeable Message Sign as part of our consultant services associated with the A-Town redevelopment area with in the City’s Platinum Triangle. TAIT services also included coordination for the undergrounding of City electrical lines and obtaining Caltrans Encroachment Permits for street and sewer improvements within state right of way along the I-5 HOV access ramps to Gene Autry Way. Reference Contact: Brian Gengler P.O. Box 5001 Victorville, CA 92393 (760) 955-5156 bgengler@ci.victorville.ca.us Client: City of Victorville Construction Cost: $3.8 M Project Dates 2011-2012 Project Team: PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM: Thomas Hawksworth Reference Contact: Natalie Meeks, Public Works Director 200 South Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92805 (714) 756-5148 nmeeks@anaheim.net Client: City of Anaheim Construction Cost: $7.3M Project Dates 2005-2008 Project Team: PIC: Jacob Vandervis PM: Todd Schmieder TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page | 21 References 1. City of Lake Forest Taylor Abernathy, PE (949) 461-3490 tabernathy@lakeforestca.gov Project: Dimension Drive, Civic Center Drive & Portola Parkway Rehabilitation Project 2. City of Stanton Allan Rigg (714) 890-4203 arigg@ci.stanton.ca.us Project: Overlay, Alley Reconstruction, and Cerritos Ave. Widening Project 3. City of Fullerton Jose Medina (714) 738-6863 Project: Jacaranda Neighborhood Rehabilitation & Sewer Replacement Project 4. City of Diamond Bar John Beshay (909) 839-7043 JBeshay@DiamondBarCA.Gov Project: Area 6 Slurry Seal and Overlay Project 5. City of Newport Beach Patricia Kharazmi, PE (949) 644-3340 FTran@NewportBeachCa.gov Projects: Ford Road & Bonita Canyon Rehab 6. City of Irvine Darrell Hartman, PE (949) 724-7556 dhartman@cityofirvine.org Project: Campus Drive Roadway Improvement 7. City of Pomona Matthew Pilarz, PE (909) 620-3652 Matt_pilarz@ci.pomona.ca.us Project: FY 13/14 Major Street Rehabilitation Project Assignment of Key Personnel TAIT has carefully considered the City’s needs on this contract. Our local engineering team is broad and includes a total of 5 project managers, 11 project engineers, 11 design engineers, 5 surveyors & mapping personnel, and separate divisions for architectural and environmental support. In order to highlight our dedication and commitment to the City, the following table outlines the key personnel for the TAIT Team who will be consistently assigned to your projects with their positions, qualifications, and availability percentage. We understand that team members may only be substituted with written permission from the City. TAIT Team Member Name Classification/ Designation Licenses/ Registration Years of Experience Time with Firm % of Availability Jacob Vandervis, P.E., QSD/P PIC &QA/QC CA No. C46301 34 23 20% David Sloan, P.E. Project Manager CA No. C82595 13 6 20% Bart Mink, P.E., LEED AP Project Engineer CA No. 82953 22 2 50% Christopher Engelbach, EIT Project Engineer E.I.T 11 4 50% AVAILABILITY OF DESIGNER/PROJECT ENGINEER POOL OF ADDITIONAL SUPPORT/DESIGN STAFF 100% TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 22 Experience and Qualifications of Key Personnel RESUMES Jacob Vandervis, PE PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE/QA/QC MANAGER Mr. Vandervis currently serves as a Vice President/Chief Operations Officer in TAIT’s Corporate Office in Santa Ana. In addition to his management duties, he acts as the primary point of contact for several national retail and residential developers. Mr. Vandervis is a licensed civil engineer with over 34 years of experience with land development projects in the western United States. His areas of expertise include site design, grading design, drainage studies, water pollution control plans, erosion & sediment control plans, as well as street improvement plans. He is experienced in site design of all sizes for commercial development, involved in preliminary design to develop cost estimates & due diligence packages, as well as experienced in the entitlement phase of projects. His surveying experience includes the preparation of ALTA and topographic surveys, parcel maps, record of survey and legal descriptions. He is a certified Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD), Certified Development, Design & Construction Professional (CDP) and Certified Retail Property Executive (CRX) Campus Drive Roadway Improvement Project, City of Irvine, Principal-In- Charge, 2017-2018 Principal-in-Charge of the work being conducted by all TAIT staff to provide civil engineering and surveying on the Campus Drive Rehabilitation Project from Michaelson Drive to University Drive. The project limits include a total of 4000 linear feet of arterial roadway rehabilitation and reconstruction on Campus Drive which is a 2 lane arterial roadway with bike lanes extending through the City of Irvine. The project includes the design of pavement rehabilitation strategies as well as the identification and replacement of non-ADA compliant curb ramps, sidewalk, replacement of damaged curb and gutter, reconstruction and re-grading of the low point of the roadway due to flooding and ponding issues, coordination with IRWD and UCI for right of way and wetlands protection, and the identification and adjustment/protection of utility facilities throughout the project limits. Overlay, Alley Reconstruction, and Cerritos Ave. Widening Project, City of Stanton, Principal-In-Charge, 2017 Principal-in-Charge of the work being conducted by all TAIT staff to provide roadway and drainage design services on three separate project areas: 1. Cerritos Avenue Widening & Drainage Improvement Project; 2. Palais Alley Reconstruction Project; 3. Bradford Community and Rutledge Avenue Rehabilitation Project. Cerritos avenue widening project required the widening of Cerritos avenue from Rose Ave to Flower Street which included removal and Education B.S. - Civil Engineering California State University, Long Beach Year of TAIT Team Enlistment 1997 Total Experience 34 Certifications Registered Professional Engineer, Civil – California, Oregon, Arizona, Utah, Nevada, North Dakota, Washington, Hawaii, and Alaska. Professional Engineer California No. C46301 TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 23 reconstruction of existing parkway improvements, relocation of power poles, fire hydrant, water meter, and roadway signs, construction of new curb and gutter, curb ramps, and alley approach, and the relocation and construction of a new storm drain catch basin and lateral. The existing storm drain lateral was discovered to be extremely shallow which required special design and consideration for the relocated condition. TAIT checked the capacity and flows of the existing inlets to ensure proposed conditions were not constrained. Newport Heights Alley and Sewer Replacement Project, City of Newport Beach, Principal-In-Charge, 2016-2017 TAIT provided civil engineering services on Newport Height Alley and Sewer Replacement Projects. The project limits spanned across an entire neighborhood in the City’s coastal community of Newport Heights and include a total of 3+ miles of alley reconstructions as well as the review and repair of existing alley sewer and lateral connections. In order to facilitate the City’s budget and timelines, the design project was split in to three phases which required separate design PS&E for each project. Phase 1 included all sewer main replacements while Phases 2 and 3 included the alley removal and replacements in the neighborhoods. Portola Parkway Resurfacing Project, City of Lake Forest, Principal-In-Charge, 2015-2016 TAIT provided civil engineering, surveying, geotechnical engineering and federal funding assistance services on the Portola Parkway Resurfacing Project from Alton Parkway to El Toro Road. The project limits include a total of 2 miles of arterial roadway rehabilitation on Portola Parkway which a 6 lane arterial roadway with bike lanes extending through the City of Lake Forest. The project includes the design of pavement rehabilitation strategies as well as the identification and replacement of non-ADA compliant curb ramps, sidewalk, replacement of damaged curb and gutter, and the identification and adjustment/protection of utility facilities. Reagan & Peterson Park Parking Lot Expansion Project, City of Diamond Bar, Principal-In-Charge, 2014-2015 Principal-in-Charge of the work being conducted by all TAIT staff to provide major street rehabilitation design services on eight streets located throughout the City. The streets to be rehabilitated include two lane residential streets with on street parking and four-lane divided arterial highways. In addition to the implantation of a pavement rehabilitation program for the 7.4 miles of city streets, the project also includes improvements to pedestrian and bicycle mobility. Class II or Class III bike lanes will be added to the city streets, broken or raised segments of sidewalks and curbs will be replaced, and sidewalk access ramps will be improved to comply with state accessibility regulations. The proposed pavement rehabilitation methodologies on this contract in lude the use of Cold Central Plant Recycled Asphalt (CCPR-AC), Conventional AC Overlays, ARHM Overlays, and Slurry/Fog Seals. FY 13/14 Major Street Rehabilitation Project, City of Pomona, Principal-In-Charge, 2014-2016 Principal-in-Charge of the work being conducted by all TAIT staff to analyze, design, and provide construction management and inspection services for the expansion of two public park parking lots. The design services included topographic survey, geotechnical investigation, water quality management design, Los Angeles County Flood Control District storm drain permit processing, and the preparation of detailed PS&E for the construction of the park improvements. TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 24 David Sloan, P.E. PROJECT MANAGER As a Project Manager, David is responsible for supervising staff at TAIT on the preparation of public and private development projects. David has performed and coordinated detailed designs on federally funded arterial roadways, conducted utility coordination for major relocations on high profile projects and conducted project management efforts on multiple projects throughout the Sothern California region. David has designed and managed the construction for multiple projects in the southern California region and is an ideal candidate to manage this project for the City. David is an effective communicator and actively stays in contact with his clients throughout the life of his projects. David has also managed multiple public works construction projects and understands the methods and costs of construction. Campus Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Project, City of Irvine, Project Manager, 2017-2018 As Project Manager, David provided civil engineering and surveying on the Campus Drive Rehabilitation Project from Michaelson Drive to University Drive. The project limits include a total of 4000 linear feet of arterial roadway rehabilitation and reconstruction on Campus Drive which is a 2 lane arterial roadway with bike lanes extending through the City of Irvine. The project includes the design of pavement rehabilitation strategies as well as the identification and replacement of non-ADA compliant curb ramps, sidewalk, replacement of damaged curb and gutter, reconstruction and re-grading of the low point of the roadway due to flooding and ponding issues, coordination with IRWD and UCI for right of way and wetlands protection, and the identification and adjustment/protection of utility facilities throughout the project limits. Overlay, Alley Reconstruction, and Cerritos Ave. Widening Project, City of Stanton, Project Manager, 2017 As Project Manager, David provided roadway and drainage design services on three separate project areas: 1. Cerritos Avenue Widening & Drainage Improvement Project; 2. Palais Alley Reconstruction Project; and 3. Bradford Community and Rutledge Avenue Rehabilitation Project. Cerritos avenue widening project required the widening of Cerritos avenue from Rose Ave to Flower Street which included removal and reconstruction of existing parkway improvements, relocation of power poles, fire hydrant, water meter, and roadway signs, construction of new curb and gutter, curb ramps, and alley approach, and the relocation and construction of a new storm drain catch basin and lateral. The existing storm drain lateral was discovered to be extremely shallow which required special design and consideration for the relocated condition. TAIT checked the capacity and flows of the existing inlets to ensure proposed conditions were not constrained. Education B.S. - Civil Engineering Tau Beta Pi Honor Society & Chi Epsilon, University of Southern California BS Physical Science, Biola Year of TAIT Team Enlistment 2014 Total Experience 13 Certifications Professional Engineer California No. 82595 TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 25 Newport Heights Alley and Sewer Replacement Project, City of Newport Beach, Project Manager, 2016-2017 As Project Manager, David provided civil engineering services on Newport Height Alley and Sewer Replacement Projects. The project limits spanned across an entire neighborhood in the City’s coastal community of Newport Heights and include a total of 3+ miles of alley reconstructions as well as the review and repair of existing alley sewer and lateral connections. In order to facilitate the City’s budget and timelines, the design project was split in to three phases which required separate design PS&E for each project. Phase 1 included all sewer main replacements while Phases 2 and 3 included the alley removal and replacements in the neighborhoods. Portola Parkway Resurfacing Project, City of Lake Forest, Project Manager, 2015-2016 As Project Manager, David provided civil engineering, surveying, geotechnical engineering and federal funding assistance services on the federally funded arterial pavement rehabilitation project which included design engineering, geotechnical engineering, surveying, and federal documentation/ approvals. The project included the rehabilitation of the arterial roadway as well as the identification and replacement of non-ADA compliant or non-functional PCC sidewalk, curb ramp, curb and gutter and other improvements. The design also included the replacement and updating of the roadway and bike lane striping throughout the project limits. The project also included the relocation and reconstruction of an existing median at Bake parkway in order to construct an additional left turn pocket. Reagan & Peterson Park Parking Lot Expansion Project, City of Diamond Bar, Project Manager, 2014- 2015 As Project Manager/Construction Manager, David analyzed, designed, and provided construction management and inspection services for the expansion of two public park parking lots. The design services included topographic survey, geotechnical investigation, water quality management design, Los Angeles County Flood Control District storm drain permit processing, and the preparation of detailed PS&E for the construction of the park improvements. Design analysis included addition of handicapped parking stalls, design of optimal cross and longitudinal grades and the installation of retaining curbs to optimize the parking stall configuration. FY 13/14 Major Street Rehabilitation Project, City of Pomona, Project Manager, 2014-2016 David acted as the Project Manager to the City of Pomona for their annual major street rehabilitation project. The project included the rehabilitation of eight arterial and collector segments of roadway throughout the City. The project required analysis of the existing pavement conditions, recommendation of alternate rehabilitation methods by use of recycled pavement options, obtaining an SCRRA railroad encroachment permits, upgrading of 4 roadway segments in add new bike lanes and the analysis and replacement of all curb ramps along the project limits. TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 26 Bart Mink, PE, LEED AP PROJECT ENGINEER Bart Mink, PE, LEED AP, a registered civil engineer in California and LEED AP certified brings 22 years of multidisciplinary experience to our team. Bart is results-driven and detail-oriented. He is proficient in many facets of civil engineering, including the municipal, industrial, commercial and residential fields. Bart is proficient in water hydraulic modeling utilizing KY Pipe and WaterCAD. He is also proficient in wastewater modeling using SewerCAD. Bart has in depth knowledge and experience in water/wastewater treatment and design. He is skilled in state and federal funding policies and procedures and is efficient with Autodesk Civil 3D including grading, corridors, and pipe networks. Bart is experienced and knowledgeable in hydrology and hydraulics utilizing such programs as TR-55 and HEC-RAS. He is also knowledgeable with FEMA Letters of Map Amendment and Map Revision procedures. Pavement Rehabilitation Ximeno Avenue and Redondo Avenue, City of Long Beach, CA, 2017 Project Engineer for engineering services for the pavement rehabilitation of Ximeno Avenue (from Atherton Street to Los Coyotes Diagonal) and Redondo Avenue (from Reservoir Drive to Stearns Street). Services included support during construction, and the supervising, coordinating, monitoring and reviewing of design plans and specifications for conformance with local agency standards, policies and procedures. Phase 2 Neighborhood Street Rehabilitation, City of La Mirada, 2017-2018 Project Engineer for roadway improvements, street resurfacing and infrastructure repairs. The intent of this project was to renovate the roadway pavement and hardscape leaving the neighborhood with a “like new” appearance. Final pavement rehabilitation included a recommendation was to mill 0.5” of the existing pavement (avoiding impacting the existing macadam), construct 2” of new pavement for much of the roadway, remove 4” of the outside six feet of A.C./macadam, and construct 4” of new A.C. pavement which ultimately resulted in significant cost savings to the City based on their prior to the approach used in previous years for street rehabilitation. 7th Street Waterline and Sewer Replacement, Seal Beach, CA, 2017 Utilities Engineer for PS&E for designing replacement of approximately 450 linear feet of existing 6” water and sewer mains. In conjunction with the utility replacement, rehabilitation of approximately Firestone Boulevard Median Project, Downey, CA, 2017-2018 Project Engineer for raised median islands, entry monument sign, street rehabilitation and water facilities improvements on Firestone Boulevard Education B.S. - Civil Engineering, Arkansas State University Year of TAIT Team Enlistment 2018 Total Experience 22 Certifications Professional Engineer California No. 82953 Arkansas No. 12169 2009/LEED Accredited Professional Associations American Public Works Association, US Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, American Society of Civil Engineers Past Memberships: National Society of Professional Engineers, American Water Works Association, Arkansas Water Works, and Water Environment Association TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 27 between Old River School Road and West City Limits. Work includes preparation of traffic study, complete plans, technical specifications and estimate (PS&E) for the proposed improvements, providing the bidding document, suitable for bidding and award of a formal unit price public works construction contract, and construction support. Lincoln Avenue Widening, Anaheim, CA, 2017-2018 Performed hydrology and hydraulic calculations as well as catch basin sizing due to the moving of existing catch basins in Lincoln Avenue. Brookshire Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation, Downey, CA, 2015-2016 Served as Project Engineer responsible for assisting the project engineer on the road rehabilitation project for the City of Downey, CA. The project included rehabilitation of the street to a new centerline profile while utilizing the existing curb and gutter location and elevation. Sidewalk Evaluation and Analysis, Santa Fe Springs, CA, 2016 Served as Project Engineer responsible for assisting the project team and the City of Santa Fe Springs by analyzing sidewalk inspection data, developing a representative unit price cost estimate for repairs, preparation of a summary report and incorporation of the evaluation into the City’s existing GIS system. Richmond Street Arterial Improvements, El Segundo, CA, 2016 Project Engineer responsible for providing engineering services for Richmond Street arterial improvements located between El Segundo Blvd. and Holly Ave. within the downtown area for 1,600 lineal feet with 60 feet of street and sidewalk width. Design work includes street, sidewalk, parking, survey, traffic and landscape improvements. On-Call Engineering/Plan-Check Services, Orange County Public Works, Plan Review Team Lead, 2018- Present Provides On-call Plan Check Services to OCPW Planned Communities for the review of Developer Submittal for a project in Ladera Ranch Covenant Hills and multiple developer projects in the PA 1 of the Ranch Plan. Serving as the Team Lead for TAIT’s consultant team of reviewers plan review submittals have ranged from Tentative Maps, Site Development Plans, Water Quality Management Plans, Rough and Precise Grading Plans, Public and Private Street Improvement Plans, Storm Drain Plans and Technical Reports, Wall and Fence Plans, Model Complex Plan, Building Master Plans, Building Repeat Plans, Landscape Plans, Park Plans, Non-residential structural submittal plans, Geotechnical Investigation Reports and Final Maps. Responsibilities as the Team Lead, in addition to conducting technical plan acceptance reviews and actual plan checks, includes coordination of the TAIT team members, coordination with the County’s management and QA/QC staff members and coordination with the Applicant and their design consultants. 6th Street Storm Drain, City of Long Beach, CA, 2017-2018 Project Engineer for the final design of this key relief storm drain system in the City of Long Beach. The project included an extensive potholing effort, hydrology, hydraulics, traffic control and obtaining encroachment permits from the County. TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 28 Christopher Engelbach, E.I.T. PROJECT ENGINEER Mr. Engelbach is an experienced Project Engineer in design, approval, and quality control of Public Works projects as well as private residential and commercial land development. He has extensive experience in preparation of storm drain, street, sewer, water, rough grading, precise grading, and erosion control plans. He has extensive experience in preparing hydrology and hydraulic analysis utilizing AES, Civil-D and WSPG for a variety of public works and private development projects. Additionally, he has experience with developing and designing Water Quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) WQMP, report preparation, coordination with clients, sub-consultants, site managers, contractors, and survey crew. Mr. Engelbach’s technical skills, abilities and engineering experience allow him to assist on all areas of a project. Jeronimo Road Widening, City of Lake Forest, Project Engineer, 2020-Current The Jeronimo Road Widening Project will correct the current roadway geometry of Jeronimo Road at the Intersection with El Toro Road in the City of Lake Forest. Mr. Engelbach is the Project Engineer handling the roadway widening design which includes vertical and horizontal design, drainage, relocation of existing public and private improvements, reconstruction of existing roadway medians and construction of a new retaining wall. In addition to engineering services Mr. Engelbach supports coordination with the client, land owners, and appropriate utility purveyors. Balboa Peninsula Alley Reconstruction and Sewer Repair Project, City of Newport Beach, Project Engineer, 2020-Current The Balboa Peninsula Project will extend the existing alley, provide needed additional width, correct existing drainage, provide accessible paths of travel, and repair damaged portions of the existing public sewer line. Mr. Engelbach’s familiarity with the City’s standards along with his knowledge of roadway design and drainage are an asset in facilitating the client’s budgetary and scheduling needs. Trabuco Road Median, City of Lake Forest, Project Engineer, 2020-Current The Trabuco Road Median Project will provide a safe left turn to and from the Ascension Cemetery Located in the City of Lake Forest. This project includes the design of a new acceleration lane and redesign of existing medians. Mr. Engelbach is the Project Engineer handling the roadway design which includes vertical and horizontal design while maintaining existing drainage patterns. Dana Point Harbor, Project Engineer, 2018-Current The Dana Point Harbor Project includes the redesign of entire guest experience at the Harbor. Mr. Engelbach is the Project Engineer providing design solutions for the harbor which includes an all new retail and dining area, roadways, Education B.S. Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Year of TAIT Team Enlistment 2016 Total Experience 11 Certifications E.I.T. TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 29 parking fields, boater services, as well as updated drainage management facilities and wet utilities. Mr. Engelbach’s knowledge of Civil 3D, drainage, grading and roadway design are providing the client the best possible solutions for their vision of the new Dana Point Harbor Experience. Campus Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Project, City of Irvine, Project Engineer, 2017-2018 The Campus Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Project, included the redesign of Campus Drive from University Drive to Carlson Ave. As part of this project Mr. Engelbach, assisted as the Project Engineer for the design of the pavement rehabilitation strategies as well as the identification and replacement of non-ADA compliant curb ramps, sidewalk, damaged curb and gutter, reconstruction and re-grading of the low point of the roadway due to flooding and ponding issues. As part of the design team he supported the coordination with IRWD and UCI for right of way and wetlands protection, and for the identification, adjustment and protection of utility facilities throughout the project limits. Mr. Engelbach’s ability to create a Civil 3D Corridor model for this project provided the client a better solution for the street design, streamlined the design process and plan production. Overlay, Alley Reconstruction, and Cerritos Ave. Widening Project, City of Stanton, Project Engineer, 2017 Project Engineer for the roadway and drainage design services on three separate project areas: 1. Cerritos Avenue Widening & Drainage Improvement Project; 2. Palais Alley Reconstruction Project; 3. Bradford Community and Rutledge Avenue Rehabilitation Project. Cerritos Avenue widening project required the widening of Cerritos avenue from Rose Ave to Flower Street which included removal and reconstruction of existing parkway improvements, relocation of power poles, fire hydrant, water meter, and roadway signs, construction of new curb and gutter, curb ramps, and alley approach, and the relocation and construction of a new storm drain catch basin and lateral. The existing storm drain lateral was discovered to be extremely shallow which required special design and consideration for the relocated condition. TAIT checked the capacity and flows of the existing inlets to ensure proposed conditions were not constrained. Newport Heights Alley and Sewer Replacement Project, City of Newport Beach, Project Engineer, 2016-2017 Project Engineer for the services on Newport Height Alley and Sewer Replacement Projects. The project limits spanned across an entire neighborhood in the City’s coastal community of Newport Heights and include a total of 3+ miles of alley reconstructions as well as the review and repair of existing alley sewer and lateral connections. In order to facilitate the City’s budget and timelines, the design project was split in to three phases which required separate design PS&E for each project. Phase 1 included all sewer main replacements while Phases 2 and 3 included the alley removal and replacements in the neighborhoods. Portola Parkway Resurfacing Project, City of Lake Forest, Project Engineer, 2015-2016 Project Engineer for the civil engineering, surveying, geotechnical engineering and federal funding assistance services on the Portola Parkway Resurfacing Project from Alton Parkway to El Toro Road. The project limits include a total of 2 miles of arterial roadway rehabilitation on Portola Parkway which a 6 lane arterial roadway with bike lanes extending through the City of Lake Forest. TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 30 TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 31 TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 32 TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 33 TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 34 TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 35 TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 36 TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 37 REQUIRED FORMS Certification of Proposal TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 38 Non-Collusion Affidavit TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 39 Compliance with Insurance Requirements TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 40 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement TAIT & Associates, Inc. On-Call Design for Street Improvement Page 41 FEE SCHEDULE Per the RFQ requirements, the fee schedule has been submitted in a separately sealed envelope. On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 0 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com PREPARED FOR: City of Hermosa Beach Attn: City Clerk 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 PREPARED BY: Civil Works Engineers, Inc. 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714.966.9060 www.civilworksengineers.com Fee Schedule for the On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements RFQ# 20-06 November 19, 2020 On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 1 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com November 19, 2020 ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS (RFQ 20-06) City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk Office Attn: Romany Basilyous 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: Fee Schedule for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements (RFQ 20-06) Please find attached the fee schedules for Civil Works Engineers, as well as those of our consultant team. Rates and fees for key personnel is guaranteed for the term for an agreement (if a warded). CWE looks forward to the opportunity to provide our services to the City of Hermosa Beach. Sincerely, Marie Marston, P.E. President Civil Works Engineers, Inc. mmarston@civilworksengineers.com On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 2 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com Fee Schedule Hourly Rates by Classification Principal 175 Project Manager 150 Senior Engineer 140 Engineer 115 Senior Designer 110 Junior Engineer/Designer 95 Junior Designer/CADD Technician 85 Clerical 65 Reimbursable Expenses Reproduction Cost Consultant Services Cost + 10% Mileage $0.58 / mile Plots Cost Delivery, Courier Cost Agency Fees Cost Commercial Travel Cost Hourly Rates by Classification Project Director 265 Technical Director 240 Senior Technical Analyst 230 Managing Consultant 215 Senior Consultant III 200 Senior Consultant II 175 Senior Consultant I 160 Associate Consultant III 150 Associate Consultant II 145 Associate Consultant I 125 Associate Consultant 115 Administrative Technician 75 Technician 75 On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 3 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com Hourly Rates by Classification 1-person crew 198 2-person crew 290 3-person crew 370 1-person crew – Overtime 228 2-person crew – Overtime 336 3-person crew – Overtime 435 Prevailing Wage Field Surveying Services 1-person crew 201 2-person crew 296 3-person crew 379 1-person crew – Overtime 231 2-person crew – Overtime 341 3-person crew – Overtime 444 Licensed Land Surveyor and Mapping Services+ (OT to be billed at 1.25%) Licensed Land Surveyor/Senior Project Manager 193 Senior Project Surveyor 173 Chief of Parties/Field Coordinator 163 Survey6 Analyst 143 Survey Aide/Clerical/Courier 123 Miscellaneous Fees Well Monument installation – includes drilling company, dig alert coordination, sand, concrete, asphalt and clay pipe – does not include monument casing - does not include monument casing $1,850 - includes monument casing $2,250 The following services are billed at our cost plus 15% Sub consultant services Map Check, filing and Agency fees paid in advance by Saddleback Surveys, Inc. Transportation, meals and lodging if needed for an out of area job Commercial Delivery services Plotting and blueprinting services, if not billed to client account. Any fees or materials purchased for a specific job-related need. Non field crew mileage will be billed at the current rate established by the IRS Notes: There will be a 2-hour minimum for Field Crew time On-Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements City of Hermosa Beach 4 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1, Costa Mesa CA 92626 714.966.9060 p | 714.966.9085 f | www.civilworksengineers.com Hourly Rates by Classification Technician I 89 Technician II / Special Inspector 99 Senior Technician / Senior Special Inspector 113 Prevailing Wage (field soils / materials tester) 147 Prevailing Wage (Special Inspector) 153 Prevailing Wage (Source Inspector, NDT and soil remediation O&M) 157 System Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Specialist 143 Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) 157 Deputy Inspector 113 Field / Laboratory Supervisor 150 Source Inspector 135 City of Los Angeles Deputy Building (including Grading) Inspector 160 Project Administrator/Word Processor/Dispatcher 82 Information Specialist 110 CAD Operator 125 GIS Specialist 140 GIS Analyst 165 Staff Engineer / Geologist / Scientist 153 Senior Staff Engineer / Geologist / Scientist / ASMR 168 Operations / Laboratory Manager 185 Project Engineer / Geologist / Scientist 190 Senior Project Engineer / Geologist / Scientist / SMR 210 Associate 230 Principal 250 Senior Principal 295 OE pays all Construction Inspectors prevailing wage rates in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). TRAFFIC ENGINEER $150 hourly QA/QC MANAGER $150 hourly PERMIT TECHNICIAN $50 hourly CLERICAL STAFF $55 hourly PLAN CHECKER $110 hourly PROJECT MANAGER $135 hourly CONSTRUCTION MANAGER $140 hourly COMMUNITY COORDINATOR $75 hourly PROJECT ENGINEER $115 hourly CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR $115 hourly $150 hourly/OT $180 hourly/OTx2 additional services (as-needed basis) design smarter. build bet- FEE RATES for ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT (RFQ 20-06) Schedule of Fees 1. Employee Classification Hourly Rate 06 - Engineering Assistant ........................................................................................................................ 70.00 18 - Project Administrator ......................................................................................................................... 100.00 04 - Engineering Designer I ...................................................................................................................... 120.00 10 - Engineering Designer II ..................................................................................................................... 145.00 03 - Project Engineer/Project Manager .................................................................................................... 165.00 25 - Project Engineer II ............................................................................................................................. 175.00 02 - Professional Engineer/Licensed Surveyor ........................................................................................ 190.00 17 - Senior Professional Engineer/Surveyor ............................................................................................ 205.00 52 - Principal II………………………………………………………………………………………………….245.00 01 - Principal ............................................................................................................................................. 215.00 15 - Structural Engineer ............................................................................................................................ 220.00 05 - Permit Expediter I .............................................................................................................................. 95.00 11 - Permit Expediter II ............................................................................................................................. 110.00 09 - Project Coordinator ............................................................................................................................ 130.00 07 - Surveyor ............................................................................................................................................. 110.00 08 - Senior Survey Specialist/ Party Chief ................................................................................................ 150.00 00 - Two man survey crew* ...................................................................................................................... 325.00* 22 - One Man Survey Crew with Robotics* .............................................................................................. 225.00* 90 - Project Manager I .............................................................................................................................. 145.00 54 - Entitlement Director ……………………………………………………………………………............. 175.00 125 - Assistant Project Manager………………………………………………………………………………130.00 91 - Project Manager II………………………………………………………………………………………... 165.00 *Prevailing Wage Rates based on current State of California Prevailing Wage Rate Schedule and the assigned project office location. The hourly rate for client authorized overtime and for representation at hearings and meetings after 6:00 p.m. will be invoiced at 1.5 times the posted rate. The above rates are inclusive of phone charges, fax charges, software and licensing fees, and photocopying charges. 2. Mileage, Travel and Per Diem Auto Mileage: IRS Rate plus 15 percent Air Travel and Auto Rental: Actual cost plus 15 percent Per Diem: Actual cost of lodging and meals, plus 15 percent 3. Materials and Supplies Office and CADD supplies are included in the hourly rates. Prints, plots and reproductions are charged at cost plus 15 percent from commercial blueprint companies. In-house reproduction charges are as follows: Prints Plots Color Plots Bond $ .95/s.f. $.95/s.f. $6.00/s.f. Vellum 1.35/s.f. 1.65/s.f. 7.50/s.f. 4. Reimbursable Expenses Will be billed at cost plus 15 percent. Client will pay directly for all permit and agency fees; otherwise cost plus 15%. Subconsultant invoices will be billed at cost plus 15%. 5. Insurance Coverage General Liability: $5,000,000 Errors/Omissions: $1,000,000 California Workers' Compensation - Statutory Certificates of insurance coverage will be provided upon request. Fee Schedule: 2020SC Escalation Rate: 3% per year 2020 SCHEDULE OF CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Document Preparation and Project Services $ 97.00/hour CAD/GIS Design Engineer $ 117.00/hour Staff Engineer or Geologist $ 150.00/hour Senior Staff Engineer or Geologist $ 175.00/hour Project Engineer or Geologist $ 195.00/hour Senior Engineer or Geologist $ 230.00/hour Associate Engineer or Geologist $ 245.00/hour Principal/Director $ 270.00/hour FIELD INSPECTION & TESTING SERVICES Staff Engineering Technician $ 105.00/hour* • Services provided under direct supervision of a Senior Engineering Technician Senior Engineering Technician $ 117.00/hour* • Inspections for soils/grading, asphalt, concrete, batch plants, piles/caissons, etc. • Certifications by ACI, ICC, Caltrans, local jurisdictions, etc. Registered Special Inspector (No 4-hour minimum) $ 117.00/hour* • Certifications by ACI, ICC, Caltrans, local jurisdictions, etc. • Reinforced concrete, Post-Tension, Masonry, Welding, Bolting, Fireproofing Instrumentation Engineer $ 150.00/hour • Slope inclinometer and Piezometer monitoring • Manometer for floor-level surveys • Stormwater turbidity & pH meter • Groundwater monitoring - pressure transducer, datalogger, water chemistry meter, etc. • Pipeline video camera for drains, wells, etc. Engineering Seismological Technician (includes 3-channel seismograph) $ 150.00/hour • Blast vibration monitoring • Construction vibration & noise monitoring (pile driving, drilling, demolition, etc.) *Notes: (1) Rates include vehicle, nuclear density gauge, and equipment for testing, inspection, and sampling. (2) No 4-hour minimum charges apply. (3) Overtime is charged at 1.5 times the base rate. Overtime is defined as time worked on the project in excess of 8 hours per day and all time on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. (4) Additional hourly surcharge for Prevailing Wage projects for Field Personnel per CA Labor Code §1720, et seq. Add $ 25.00/hour LABORATORY TESTING SERVICES Laboratory Testing $ 120.00/hour (For special materials testing and laboratory costs on a per-test basis, see GMU’s Laboratory Fee Schedule) OTHER CHARGES Outside Services Cost + 15% Reimbursables & Reprographics Cost RFQ No. 20-02. On-Call Engineering Design Services for Utilities City of Hermosa Beach 9 63556 Fee Schedule Billing Title 2021 Bill Rate 2022 Bill Rate Sr. Director $225.00 $231.75 Director $200.00 $206.00 Project Manager 3 $190.00 $195.70 Project Manager 2 $165.00 $169.95 Project Manager 1 $140.00 $144.20 Environ. Planner 6 $185.00 $190.55 Environ. Planner 5 $154.00 $158.62 Environ. Planner 4 $134.00 $138.02 Environ. Planner 3 $114.00 $117.42 Environ. Planner 2 $104.00 $107.12 Environ. Planner 1 $93.00 $95.79 Cultural Resources Specialist 6 $165.00 $169.95 Cultural Resources Specialist 5 $134.00 $138.02 Cultural Resources Specialist 4 $118.00 $121.54 Cultural Resources Specialist 3 $103.00 $106.09 Cultural Resources Specialist 2 $92.00 $94.76 Cultural Resources Specialist 1 $73.00 $75.19 Biologist / Botanist 6 $185.00 $190.55 Biologist / Botanist 5 $149.00 $153.47 Biologist / Botanist 4 $129.00 $132.87 Biologist / Botanist 3 $113.00 $116.39 Biologist / Botanist 2 $103.00 $106.09 Biologist / Botanist 1 $93.00 $95.79 GIS Technician 4 $147.00 $151.41 GIS Technician 3 $122.00 $125.66 GIS Technician 2 $107.00 $110.21 GIS Technician 1 $99.00 $101.97 The three selected ﬁrms recommended by staff are highlighted Hourly Billing Rate Fee Schedule Table for On Call Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements #Firm Name Project Manager CADD Technician 1 Civil Works Engineers (CWE)$150 $85 2 CSG Consultants, Inc.$220 - 3 David Evans and Associates Inc. $329.37 $95 4 Huitt-Zollars $200 $110 5 JMC2 Team $185 $120 6 Kabbara Engineering $175 $95 7 KCG $200 $110 8 NV5 $180 $118 9 Onward Engineering $135 - 10 PacRim Engineering $220 $125 11 PSOMAS $180 $117 12 TAIT $165 $117 Agreement No. 21.001 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND CIVIL WORKS ENGINEERS (CWE), INC. This AGREEMENT is entered into this 9th day of February 2021, by and between the CITY OF Hermosa Beach, a general law city a municipal corporation (“CITY”) and Onward Engineering, Inc. (“CONSULTANT”). R E C I T A L S A. The City desires to obtain Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements on an On- Call basis with Civil Works Engineers (CWE), Inc. for City projects. B. The City does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services required under this agreement and therefore, the City desires to contract for consulting services to accomplish this work. C. The Consultant warrants to the City that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement. D. The City desires to contract with the Consultant to perform the services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, the City and the Consultant agree as follows: 1. CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as EXHIBIT A. B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a total not to exceed $300,000, for CONSULTANT’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement, in accordance with the hourly rate schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. D. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. E. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each month, its invoice for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous month. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT all uncontested amounts set forth in CONSULTANT’s invoice within 30 days after it is received. Agreement No. 21.001 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. A. CONSULTANT will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF SERVICE attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. B. Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. 3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period in accordance with the schedule of compensation incorporated in “Exhibit A.” 4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of the CONSULTANT are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from the CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is completed to the CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in “Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing b y the CITY. 5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. 6. KEY PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT’s key person assigned to perform work under this Agreement is . CONSULTANT shall not assign another person to be in charge of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City. 7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on February 9, 2024 unless earlier termination occurs under Section 11 of this Agreement, or this Agreement is extended in writing in advance by both parties. 8. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. 9. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 10. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. Agreement No. 21.001 11. TERMINATION. A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing. B. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days before the effective termination date. C. In the event of such termination, the CONSULTANT shall cease services as of the date of termination, and all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination. D. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. 12. INDEMNIFICATION. To the extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature to the extent caused by CONSULTANT's negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct in the performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) with respect to claims determined by a trier of fact to have been the result of the CONSULTANT’s negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct. CONSULTANT shall reimburse the CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation to the extent such fees, costs and all other costs are determined by the court of competent jurisdiction to have been caused by the actual negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the Consultant. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement. 13. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT’s professional services. CONSULTANT’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only. 15. AUDIT OF RECORDS. A. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or Agreement No. 21.001 designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement. B. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement. 16. CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement. CONSU LTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by the City to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective measures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement. 17. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. A. The CONSULTANT, at the CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies: 1. Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. The Consultant shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the CONTRACTOR for City. 2. General Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain commerci al general liability insurance in an amount of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate li mit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. 3. Automobile Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injur y and property damage for all activities of the CONSULTANT arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. 4. Professional Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from the CONSULTANT’S operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by the CONSULTANT or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this i nsurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual Agreement No. 21.001 aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. B. Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California, or which is approved in writing by City, and shall be endorsed as follows. CONSULTANT also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.” 2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self-insured retention the CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy. 3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. 4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents. 5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. 6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the CITY. C. CONSULTANT agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY. D. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. At the CITY’s option, the CONSULTANT shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. E. The CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance Agreement No. 21.001 shall be filed with the CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement. F. Failure on the part of the CONSULTANT to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11 above. G. The commercial general and automobile liabilit y policies required by this Agreement shall allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the Consultant (as the named insured) should Consultant fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. Consultant understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by Consultant as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City pay the SIR or deductible on Consultant’s behalf upon the Consultant’s failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any action against Consultant for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by City due to the breach. 18. USE OF OTHER CONSULTANTS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY’s prior written approval to use any sub-consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must include approval of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. 19. FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the CONSULTANT of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of the CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONSULTANT for anything done, furnished or relating to the CONSULTANT’S work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of the CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by the CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of the CONSULTANT, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by the CITY for any defect or error in the work prepared by the Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents. 20. CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the CONSULTANT shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during the City’s review of the Consultant’s report or plans. Should the Consultant fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by the CITY, and the cost thereof shall be charged to the CONSULTANT. In addition to all other available remedies, the City may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by the City or may withhold payment otherwise owed CONSULTANT under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction. 21. NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONSULTANT by CITY for services preformed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of CONSULTANT’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover payment for CONSULTANT’S services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year. Agreement No. 21.001 22. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: CITY CONSULTANT City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ATTN: Romany Basilyous Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of notices may be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or personally delivered as specified in this Section. A. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. B. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT’s or CITY’s obligations under this Agreement. C. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County. D. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. E. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. F. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY. 23. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Contract, agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission Agreement No. 21.001 or scanned and delivered via electronic mail. Such facsimile or electronic mail copies will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 24. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other. 25. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided. 26. ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled. 27. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency. 28. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. It is understood and agreed that the City shall own all documents and other work product of the Consultant, except the Consultant’s notes and workpapers, which pertain to the work performed under this Agreement. The City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the Consultant, but any re-use of such documents by the City on any other project without prior written consent of the Consultant shall be at the sole risk of the City. 1. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (City and Consultant initials required at one of the following paragraphs) By their respective initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is a “consultant” for the purposes of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties would require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions set forth in Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation 18701(a)(2) or otherwise serves in a staff capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were Consultant employed by the City. Consultant hereby acknowledges his or her assuming-office, annual, and leaving-office financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at his or her expense. Prior to consultant commencing services hereunder, the City’s Manager shall prepar e and deliver to consultant a memorandum detailing the extent of Consultant’s disclosure obligations in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials Consultant Initials OR Agreement No. 21.001 Page 9 of 9 By their initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is not a “consultant” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of consultant in Fair Political Practice Commission Regulation 18701(a)(2)(A) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials Consultant Initials __ 29. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first herein above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT Justin Massey, Mayor By: Onward Engineering, Inc. ATTEST: Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Jenkins, City Attorney Agreement No. 21.002 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND ONWARD ENGINEERING, INC. This AGREEMENT is entered into this 9th day of February 2021, by and between the CITY OF Hermosa Beach, a general law city a municipal corporation (“CITY”) and Onward Engineering, Inc. (“CONSULTANT”). R E C I T A L S A. The City desires to obtain Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements on an On- Call basis with Onward Engineering, Inc. for City projects. B. The City does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services required under this agreement and therefore, the City desires to contract for consulting services to accomplish this work. C. The Consultant warrants to the City that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement. D. The City desires to contract with the Consultant to perform the services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, the City and the Consultant agree as follows: 1. CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as EXHIBIT A. B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a total not to exceed $300,000, for CONSULTANT’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement, in accordance with the hourly rate schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. D. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. E. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each month, its invoice for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous month. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT all uncontested amounts set forth in CONSULTANT’s invoice within 30 days after it is received. Agreement No. 21.002 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. A. CONSULTANT will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF SERVICE attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. B. Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. 3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period in accordance with the schedule of compensation incorporated in “Exhibit A.” 4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of the CONSULTANT are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from the CITY and shall continue until all authorized work i s completed to the CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in “Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing b y the CITY. 5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. 6. KEY PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT’s key person assigned to perform work under this Agreement is . CONSULTANT shall not assign another person to be in charge of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City. 7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on February 9, 2024 unless earlier termination occurs under Section 11 of this Agreement, or this Agreement is extended in writing in advance by both parties. 8. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. 9. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 10. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. Agreement No. 21.002 11. TERMINATION. A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing. B. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days before the effective termination date. C. In the event of such termination, the CONSULTANT shall cease services as of the date of termination, and all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination. D. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. 12. INDEMNIFICATION. To the extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature to the extent caused by CONSULTANT's negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct in the performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) with respect to claims determined by a trier of fact to have been the result of the CONSULTANT’s negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct. CONSULTANT shall reimburse the CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation to the extent such fees, costs and all other costs are determined by the court of competent jurisdiction to have been caused by the actual negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the Consultant. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement. 13. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT’s professional services. CONSULTANT’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers whi le under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only. 15. AUDIT OF RECORDS. A. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or Agreement No. 21.002 designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for th e purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement. B. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement. 16. CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement. CONSULTA NT will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by the City to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective measures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement. 17. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. A. The CONSULTANT, at the CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies: 1. Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. The Consultant shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the CONTRACTOR for City. 2. General Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. 3. Automobile Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injur y and property damage for all activities of the CONSULTANT arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. 4. Professional Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from the CONSULTANT’S operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by the CONSULTANT or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual Agreement No. 21.002 aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. B. Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California, or which is approved in writing by City, and shall be endorsed as follows. CONSULTANT also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.” 2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self-insured retention the CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy. 3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. 4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents. 5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. 6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the CITY. C. CONSULTANT agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY. D. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. At the CITY’s option, the CONSULTANT shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. E. The CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance Agreement No. 21.002 shall be filed with the CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement. F. Failure on the part of the CONSULTANT to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11 above. G. The commercial general and automobile liabilit y policies required by this Agreement shall allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the Consultant (as the named insured) should Consultant fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. Consultant understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by Consultant as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City pay the SIR or deductible on Consultant’s behalf upon the Consultant’s failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any action against Consultant for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by City due to the breach. 18. USE OF OTHER CONSULTANTS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY’s prior written approval to use any sub-consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must include approval of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. 19. FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the CONSULTANT of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of the CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONSULTANT for anything done, furnished or relating to the CONSULTANT’S work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of the CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by the CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of the CONSULTANT, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by the CITY for any defect or error in the work prepared by the Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents. 20. CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the CONSULTANT shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during the City’s review of the Consultant’s report or plans. Should the Consultant fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by the CITY, and the cost thereof shall be charged to the CONSULTANT. In addition to all other available remedies, the City may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by the City or may withhold payment otherwise owed CONSULTANT under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction. 21. NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONSULTANT by CITY for services preformed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of CONSULTANT’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover payment for CONSULTANT’S services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year. Agreement No. 21.002 22. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: CITY CONSULTANT City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ATTN: Romany Basilyous Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of notices may be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or personally delivered as specified in this Section. A. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. B. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT’s or CITY’s obligations under this Agreement. C. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County. D. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. E. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. F. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY. 23. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Contract, agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission Agreement No. 21.002 or scanned and delivered via electronic mail. Such facsimile or electronic mail copies will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 24. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other. 25. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided. 26. ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled. 27. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency. 28. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. It is understood and agreed that the City shall own all documents and other work product of the Consultant, except the Consultant’s notes and workpapers, which pertain to the work performed under this Agreement. The City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the Consultant, but any re-use of such documents by the City on any other project without prior written consent of the Consultant shall be at the sole risk of the City. 1. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (City and Consultant initials required at one of the following paragraphs) By their respective initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is a “consultant” for the purposes of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties would require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions set forth in Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation 18701(a)(2) or otherwise serves in a staff capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were Consultant employed by the City. Consultant hereby acknowledges his or her assuming-office, annual, and leaving-office financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at his or her expense. Prior to consultant commencing services hereunder, the City’s Manager shall prepar e and deliver to consultant a memorandum detailing the extent of Consultant’s disclosure obligations in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials Consultant Initials OR Agreement No. 21.002 Page 9 of 9 By their initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is not a “consultant” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of consultant in Fair Political Practice Commission Regulation 18701(a)(2)(A) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials Consultant Initials __ 29. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first herein above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT Justin Massey, Mayor By: Onward Engineering, Inc. ATTEST: Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Jenkins, City Attorney Agreement No. 21.003 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ON-CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC. This AGREEMENT is entered into this 9th day of February 2021, by and between the CITY OF Hermosa Beach, a general law city a municipal corporation (“CITY”) and TAIT & Associates, Inc. (“CONSULTANT”). R E C I T A L S A. The City desires to obtain Engineering Design Services for Street Improvements on an On- Call basis with TAIT & Associates, Inc. for City projects. B. The City does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services required under this agreement and therefore, the City desires to contract for consulting services to accomplish this work. C. The Consultant warrants to the City that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement. D. The City desires to contract with the Consultant to perform the services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, the City and the Consultant agree as follows: 1. CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as EXHIBIT A. B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a total not to exceed $300,000, for CONSULTANT’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement, in accordance with the hourly rate schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. D. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. E. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each month, its invoice for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous month. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT all uncontested amounts set forth in CONSULTANT’s invoice within 30 days after it is received. Agreement No. 21.003 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. A. CONSULTANT will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF SERVICE attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. B. Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. 3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period in accordance with the schedule of compensation incorporated in “Exhibit A.” 4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of the CONSULTANT are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from the CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is completed to the CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in “Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing b y the CITY. 5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. 6. KEY PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT’s key person assigned to perform work under this Agreement is DAVID SLOAN, P.E. . CONSULTANT shall not assign another person to be in charge of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City. 7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on February 9, 2024 unless earlier termination occurs under Section 11 of this Agreement, or this Agreement is extended in writing in advance by both parties. 8. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. 9. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 10. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in co nnection with the performance of services under this Agreement. Agreement No. 21.003 11. TERMINATION. A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing. B. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days before the effective termination date. C. In the event of such termination, the CONSULTANT shall cease services as of the date of termination, and all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination. D. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. 12. INDEMNIFICATION. To the extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature to the extent caused by CONSULTANT's negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct in the performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) with respect to claims determined by a trier of fact to have been the result of the CONSULTANT’s negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct. CONSULTANT shall reimburse the CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation to the extent such fees, costs and all other costs are determined by the court of competent jurisdiction to have been caused by the actual negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the Consultant. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement. 13. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT’s professional services. CONSULTANT’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers whi le under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only. 15. AUDIT OF RECORDS. A. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or Agreement No. 21.003 designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for th e purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement. B. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement. 16. CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement. CONSULTA NT will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by the City to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective measures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement. 17. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. A. The CONSULTANT, at the CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies: 1. Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. The Consultant shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the CONTRACTOR for City. 2. General Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. 3. Automobile Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injur y and property damage for all activities of the CONSULTANT arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. 4. Professional Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from the CONSULTANT’S operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by the CONSULTANT or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual Agreement No. 21.003 aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. B. Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California, or which is approved in writing by City, and shall be endorsed as follows. CONSULTANT also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.” 2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self-insured retention the CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy. 3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. 4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents. 5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. 6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the CITY. C. CONSULTANT agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY. D. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. At the CITY’s option, the CONSULTANT shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. E. The CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance Agreement No. 21.003 shall be filed with the CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement. F. Failure on the part of the CONSULTANT to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11 above. G. The commercial general and automobile liabilit y policies required by this Agreement shall allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the Consultant (as the named insured) should Consultant fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. Consultant understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by Consultant as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City pay the SIR or deductible on Consultant’s behalf upon the Consultant’s failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any action against Consultant for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by City due to the breach. 18. USE OF OTHER CONSULTANTS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY’s prior written approval to use any sub-consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must include approval of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. 19. FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the CONSULTANT of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of the CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONSULTANT for anything done, furnished or relating to the CONSULTANT’S work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of the CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by the CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of the CONSULTANT, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by the CITY for any defect or error in the work prepared by the Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents. 20. CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the CONSULTANT shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during the City’s review of the Consultant’s report or plans. Should the Consultant fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by the CITY, and the cost thereof shall be charged to the CONSULTANT. In addition to all other available remedies, the City may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by the City or may withhold payment otherwise owed CONSULTANT under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction. 21. NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONSULTANT by CITY for services preformed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of CONSULTANT’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover payment for CONSULTANT’S services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year. Agreement No. 21.003 22. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: CITY CONSULTANT City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ATTN: Romany Basilyous TAIT & Associates, Inc. 701 Parkcenter Drive Santa Ana, CA, ATTN: Jacob Vandervis. P.E. Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of notices may be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or personally delivered as specified in this Section. A. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. B. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT’s or CITY’s obligations under this Agreement. C. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County. D. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. E. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. F. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY. 23. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Contract, agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission Agreement No. 21.003 or scanned and delivered via electronic mail. Such facsimile or electronic mail copies will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 24. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other. 25. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided. 26. ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled. 27. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency. 28. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. It is understood and agreed that the City shall own all documents and other work product of the Consultant, except the Consultant’s notes and workpapers, which pertain to the work performed under this Agreement. The City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the Consultant, but any re-use of such documents by the City on any other project without prior written consent of the Consultant shall be at the sole risk of the City. 1. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (City and Consultant initials required at one of the following paragraphs) By their respective initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is a “consultant” for the purposes of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties would require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions set forth in Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation 18701(a)(2) or otherwise serves in a staff capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were Consultant employed by the City. Consultant hereby acknowledges his or her assuming-office, annual, and leaving-office financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at his or her expense. Prior to consultant commencing services hereunder, the City’s Manager shall prepar e and deliver to consultant a memorandum detailing the extent of Consultant’s disclosure obligations in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials Consultant Initials OR Agreement No. 21.003 Page 9 of 9 By their initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is not a “consultant” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of consultant in Fair Political Practice Commission Regulation 18701(a)(2)(A) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials Consultant Initials __ 29. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first herein above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT Justin Massey, Mayor By: TAIT & Associates, Inc. ATTEST: Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Jenkins, City Attorney City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0100 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 UAS (DRONE) PROGRAM (Police Chief Paul LeBaron) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1.Authorize the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the City of Redondo Beach for an Unmanned Aerial Support (UAS) program; and 2.Approve the expenditure of $30,000 to join Redondo Beach Police Department’s UAS program. Executive Summary: The Hermosa Beach Police Department continuously explores new technologies to operate more efficiently and further enhance the safety of the community. In recent years, there have been great advances in the technology of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) and their use in public safety. UAV technology, also known as drones, provides valuable information to public safety personnel in multiple scenarios such as critical incidents and pre-planned events. Staff began exploring UAV technology in 2019 by publishing a Notice Inviting Bids (NIB) for contract drone services. The NIB resulted in one response from Flying Lion, LLC. Upon review of the proposal, the vendor invited Hermosa Beach to explore, and potentially join, an improved Unmanned Aerial Support (UAS) program they were working on with Redondo Beach Police Department. After a demonstration and thorough assessment of the proposed UAS program with Redondo Beach, staff determined that it met and exceeded the NIB requirements for drone services in Hermosa Beach. Based on the success of Redondo Beach PD’s Drone First Responder (DFR)program,and the current ability to expand that program to Hermosa Beach,staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the MOU and to approve the expenditure of $30,000 for Hermosa Beach PD to join Redondo Beach PD’s UAS program. Background: During any significant event, it is very important for public safety personnel to have a good City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0100 understanding of the situation which commonly includes an aerial view. Historically, aerial views were provided to the Hermosa Beach Police Department via helicopters from nearby partners such as Hawthorne PD, Long Beach PD and Los Angeles PD. Unfortunately, helicopter support from neighboring agencies is not always available and when this occurs, the Police Department is required to work without aerial views. In addition, helicopters are not commonly approved for pre-planned events such as the annual Fiesta Hermosa, Concerts on the Beach, and July 4 th deployment. With technology advances, many law enforcement agencies are now using UAV as another tool to provide aerial support during significant events. While UAV cannot replace helicopter support in certain situations, they do have some advantages which include: ·Lower operations costs ·Greater availability ·Ability to provide a live video feed to the operator, who can then share with officers in the area and any established command post ·Reduced downtime when swapping drones versus a helicopter which may need to return to base to refuel ·Ability to fly longer durations versus helicopters which have limited flying time ·Improved ability to fly without detection by potential suspects ·Reduced air and noise pollution impact to the community The use of drones has proven to be incredibly useful for public safety as an alternative to the use of helicopters. Discussion: The cost for drone services was approved in the 2019-2020 fiscal year. Staff published a NIB in August 2019 for a contract for drone services. Deputy City Clerk Cowley indicated that only one proposal had been received from Flying Lion, LLC. Flying Lion, LLC currently has a similar contract for drone services with the City of Redondo Beach and the City of Manhattan Beach. While working on the language of an hourly contract with Flying Lion, LLC, Hermosa Beach PD learned of a new DFR program with Flying Lion, LLC, in Redondo Beach, which has several advantages over a contract for hourly services. Redondo Beach PD conducted a 4-week pilot program which demonstrated a significant reduction in response times, the ability for the UAV to clear multiple calls without the need to use field patrol resources, the ability to locate subjects and direct patrol officers to them and a very successful case where the UAV located a fleeing robbery suspect and directed officers to his location. Below is a summary provided by Redondo Beach PD of its current DFR program.. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 2 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0100 Redondo Beach PD has utilized a UAS program since 2017. In 2019, the technology significantly improved involving UAS’s in law enforcement and in 2020, the Novel Coronavirus pandemic began, resulting in the evaluation of UASs to provide a more efficient, effective, safer and healthier way to provide law enforcement services. The initial step in the evaluation was to convene a working group which could gauge the capabilities of UASs, infrastructure, the use of UASs in other police jurisdictions and the fiscal impact of operating a DFR program. The group quickly identified the Chula Vista Police Department, in California as an agency who has extensively tested and utilize UASs for law enforcement purposes. In October 2018, the first DFR was implemented in the City of Chula Vista. The Chula Vista Police Department management team describe the program as a transformational method of policing and has demonstrated the ability to increase officer and community safety while reducing overall police response times. The DFR program consists of a Remote Pilot in Command (RPIC), which is staffed by Flying Lion, LLC., operating the UAS from a building rooftop while a trained Teleoperator, staffed by a police officer, can manipulate the UAS and communicate critical intelligence to the ground units. Next, infrastructure was evaluated. The rooftop of the Beach Cities Health District (BCHD) rooftop is a tall platform which allows for line of site observation for the UAS into North Redondo Beach, South Redondo Beach and the City of Hermosa Beach. A dedicated internet line was installed at the rooftop site which allows for maximum internet connection to the UAS. Additionally, LIVE911, a software which allows the Teleoperator to view live incoming emergency calls, in real time, as they are being called in. This technology allows the Teleoperator to launch the UAS and fly to the call for service, many times prior to it being dispatched to the ground units. This technology adds a significant layer of efficiency to our service. Finally, The UAS group chose a web-based application (C.A.P.E.) which integrates the UA onto a mapping program. The C.A.P.E. system allows for management and supervisors to monitor the UAS while in flight. This is particularly an added benefit during high risk operations and incidents requiring greater oversight. On April 14th, 2020, the Redondo Beach Police Department began a 4-week pilot program to determine the value of a UAS program. The core concept of the UAS program involved sending Unmanned Aerial Vehicles directly to calls-for-service to provide rapid air support for officers in the field. These UASs were generally utilized in the same manner that law enforcement helicopters are utilized today. The lower cost of UAS usage allowed for the same type of aerial coverage for calls-for-service that did not previously meet the threshold to justify the cost and liability of a helicopter. It should be noted that the UAS only responded to calls-for -service. At no time was the UAS utilized for surveillance or investigative purposes, nor was it utilized to support patrol operations by proactively initiating detentions. Flight boundaries were tested, as well, which showed the UAS could cover nearly every portion of Redondo Beach City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 3 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0100 and Hermosa Beach. The privacy of our (Redondo Beach) community members was a vitally important consideration for the usage of UAVs. In order to maintain that privacy, and to keep the trust of the community, the following steps were taken during the pilot program: •The usage of a UAV was limited to responding to calls-for-service from community members, or “higher than normal” risk traffic and pedestrian stops initiated by patrol officers •At no time was the UAV utilized for surveillance or investigative purposes, nor was it utilized to support patrol operations by proactively identifying suspicious persons or vehicles that may have satisfied probable cause for detention •Cameras on the UAV were pointed towards the direction of travel as the UAV traveled to and from launch sites. This was to prevent any unnecessary viewings of people, vehicles or properties that were irrelevant to calls-for-service. •Aerial imagery (through photographs and video) was only recorded and saved for pertinent calls-for-service that required it •All footage recorded through the UAV was subjected to the policies and procedures set forth by Redondo Beach Police Department Policy Manual, Section 450 •All flight missions were documented, and available for audit if required The average response time for Priority 1 calls without Unmanned Air Support was 2 minutes and 51 seconds. The average response time for Priority 1 calls with Unmanned Air Support was 1 minute and 39 seconds. UAS decreased response times to Priority 1 calls by 42.1%. The average response time for Priority 2 calls without Unmanned Air Support was 5 minutes and 22 seconds. The average response time for Priority 2 calls with Unmanned Air Support was 1 minute and 29 seconds. UAS decreased response times for Priority 2 calls by 72.3%. The average response time for Priority 3 calls without Unmanned Air Support was 12 minutes and 51 seconds. The average response time for Priority 3 calls with Unmanned Air Support was 3 minutes and 12 seconds. UAS decreased response times for Priority 3 calls by 75.1%. Of the 177 flight missions conducted as a response to calls-for-service during the 4-week period, 55 calls-for-service were cleared without requiring patrol resources. As the program began to optimize, the team saw an average of 51 flight missions a week, with 17 calls cleared per week. That means that roughly 33% of calls-for-service were being cleared without requiring patrol resources. It should be noted that of the 55 calls-for-service cleared by UAS, 19 were regarding a COVID-19 issue. This will likely affect the call clearance rate after the pandemic is resolved. Unmanned Air Support was able to successfully locate 22 subjects and direct patrol units detain them. Each subject was relevant to a call-for-service generated by a community member. Most of the subjects detained were involved in calls generated for disturbing the peace or suspicious circumstances. The most impactful detention made by Unmanned Air Support during the pilot program was of a suspect fleeing the scene of a robbery that had just City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 4 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0100 occurred. A UAV was deployed, and the suspect was located in a moving vehicle, 1.3 miles away from the scene of the crime. The suspect was successfully taken into custody after Air Support Officers directed units to his location for a high-risk vehicle stop. During the pilot period, no formal complaints were made by residents regarding UAS usage. Several members of the community did contact the Department via phone and email to inquire about the increased usage. In those cases, members of the Department answered their questions and provided them with more information about the UAS program. Redondo Beach PD invited Hermosa Beach PD to a demonstration of their DFR and after review of the DFR program, staff believes that it is a more effective and efficient use of a UAV program. Redondo Beach PD invited Hermosa Beach PD to consider joining their DFR program. If approved, the Hermosa Beach Police Department would follow the same guidelines as Redondo Beach PD and only utilize the UAS in response to a call-for-service or a “higher than normal” risk contact by police officers. Hermosa Beach PD would respect the privacy concerns of the community and would not use the UAS for surveillance, nor would the Department utilize it to support patrol operations by proactively initiating detentions. Hermosa Beach PD presented the DFR program and the possible partnership with Redondo Beach PD to the Community Police Advisory Board (CPAB) and asked for their feedback. The CPAB was in support of the program and the advantages to this service. The CPAB raised some of the same concerns regarding privacy and video recordings which are discussed above. Hermosa Beach PD recently implemented a UAS Operations policy which addresses concerns of privacy and evidence retention. The UAS Operations policy is attached to this report for reference. With the ability to clear some calls for service without sending a uniformed officer, the CPAB also discussed how the DFR program may affect police services. Hermosa Beach PD emphasized that the DFR program is a tool for officers and it would not replace the need to send uniformed officers to calls for service. Hermosa Beach PD is committed to respond to all calls and if any calls can be cleared with a UAV, we would provide feedback to the caller(s) to let them know what actions were taken. If approved, Hermosa Beach PD would join with Redondo Beach PD to participate in a joint law enforcement task force called the Unmanned Air Support Unit. The UAS Unit would operate out of the Redondo Beach police station where they would be able to respond to any calls for service in either Redondo Beach or Hermosa Beach. The UAS Unit would operate four days a week for a total of 40 hours. Hermosa Beach PD would have access to the UAS Unit during those hours. Due to the current interoperability of radio communications in the South Bay, both agencies can communicate with each other in real time during significant incidents. To help support the UAS Unit Hermosa Beach PD would provide an officer one day (10 hours) per week, if staffing levels permit, to serve as the Teleoperator, also known as the Air Support Officer (ASO). Redondo Beach PD would provide all the equipment, infrastructure and ASO training for Hermosa Beach personnel. Those officers City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 5 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0100 authorized to work as an ASO would also receive training to become an FAA-licensed UAV Pilot. The UAV Pilot training would be provided by the Hermosa Beach Police Department. Using the current technology and software provided by Redondo Beach PD, Hermosa Beach PD supervisors and command staff would have the ability to view live footage at a command post, desktop computer or smartphone. The UAS Unit would commence upon execution by both Parties of the MOU and will continue until one party decides to no longer participate in the joint unit. The MOU can be terminated by either party with no less than 60 days written notice. General Plan Consistency: PLAN Hermosa, the City’s General Plan, was adopted by the City Council in August 2017. PLAN Hermosa was divided into seven elements, each with multiple goals. The contract for drone services will help accomplish several goals of the Governance, Mobility, Sustainability and Conservation and Public Safety Elements. Governance Element Goal 3 - Excellent customer service through the use of emerging technologies. ·Implementation Action 3 - Identify and implement opportunities to utilize technology and digital resources to improve delivery of services to the community. Mobility Element Goal 8 - Facilitate sustainable, effective, and safe movement of goods and commercial vehicles. ·8.5 Utilize technology. Encourage commercial vehicles to utilize technologies that minimize air pollution, fuel use, and greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainability and Conservation Element Goal 1 - Hermosa Beach is a low-carbon municipal organization, reducing greenhouse gas emissions at a rate that meets or exceeds 80% below 2005 levels by 2030. ·1.9 Equipment sharing.Explore opportunities to share, lease, or jointly utilize equipment for City operations. Goal 2. Hermosa Beach is a low-carbon community meeting State greenhouse gas reduction goals by 2040. ·2.7 Emerging technologies. Regularly evaluate new and emerging technology changes that can help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and encourage the use of such technology when it is demonstrated to be effective at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and a fiscally responsible investment. Goal 3. Improved air quality and reduced air pollution emissions. ·3.7 Regional air quality.When possible, collaborate with other agencies within the region to improve air quality and meet or exceed State and Federal air quality standards through regional efforts to reduce air pollution from mobile sources, including trucks and passenger City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 6 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0100 vehicles and other large polluters. Public Safety Element Goal 5. High quality police and fire protection services provided to residents and visitors. ·5.3 Use of technology.Provide and use smart surveillance technology and communication systems to improve crime prevention and inform the community regarding actions to take in case of emergency.5.7 Collaborate with neighboring jurisdictions.Cooperate and collaborate with neighboring jurisdictions and social services to maximize public safety and emergency services. Fiscal Impact: The cost to participate in a joint UAS program with the City of Redondo Beach is $30,000 per year. This fee goes towards Redondo Beach’s costs related to managing the UAS program such as personnel time spent on the program, annual contract fees with Flying Lion, LLC for RPIC staff time, drone equipment, and annual contract fees with Motorola Inc. for software support. This program is a much higher level of service than the original contract for hourly services. In fiscal year 2019-2020, City Council approved $18,000.00 from the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) for drone services which was based on anticipated hourly services for special events or significant events. Only $2,325.00 of those funds were used and $15,675 was reappropriated to the 2020-21 budget to implement a drone program. In fiscal year 2020-21, City Council approved $18,000 from the SLESF for drone services. The department used $2,700.00 for drone operations on July 4, 2020, leaving the Department with $30,975 available funds for drone services. Staff recommends using the available funds in fiscal year 2020-21 to pay for year one costs of this program. Future annual costs will be requested as part of the regular budget process. Agreement Request Request Amount FY 2020-21 Budget Dept. Account #Total Contract Amount $30,000 153-2106-4201 $30,000 Attachments: 1. MOU for unmanned aerial support cooperation 2. Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations policy Respectfully Submitted by: Landon Phillips, Lieutenant Concur: Paul LeBaron, Chief of Police City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 7 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0100 Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 8 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Policy O3.73 Page 1 of 3 HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT O3.73 UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM (UAS) OPERATIONS Effective 02/01/2021 Updated PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for the use of an unmanned aerial system (UAS) and for the storage, retrieval and dissemination of images and data captured by the UAS. DEFINITIONS Definitions related to this policy include: Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) - An unmanned aircraft of any type that is capable of sustaining directed flight, whether preprogrammed or remotely controlled (commonly referred to as an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)), and all of the supporting or attached systems designed for gathering information through imaging, recording or any other means. POLICY Unmanned aerial systems may be utilized to enhance the department’s mission of protecting lives and property when other means and resources are not available or are less effective. Any use of a UAS will be in strict accordance with constitutional and privacy rights and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations. PRIVACY The use of the UAS potentially involves privacy considerations. Absent a warrant or exigent circumstances, operators and observers shall adhere to FAA altitude regulations and s hall not intentionally record or transmit images of any location where a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g., residence, yard, enclosure). Operators and observers shall take reasonable precautions to avoid inadvertently recording or transmitting images of areas where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. Reasonable precautions can include, for example, deactivating or turning imaging devices away from such areas or persons during UAS operations. PROGRAM COORDINATOR The Chief of Police will appoint a program coordinator who will be responsible for the management of the UAS program. The program coordinator will ensure that policies and procedures conform to current laws, regulations and best practices and will have the following additional responsibilities: Policy O3.73 Page 2 of 3 • Coordinating the FAA Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) application process and ensuring that the COA is current. • Ensuring that all authorized operators and required observers have completed all required FAA and department-approved training in the operation, applicable laws, policies and procedures regarding use of the UAS. • Developing uniform protocol for submission and evaluation of requests to deploy a UAS, including urgent requests made during ongoing or emerging incidents. Deployment of a UAS shall require authorization of the authorized designee or Watch Commander, depending on the type of deployment. • Developing protocol for conducting criminal investigations involving a UAS. • Implementing a system for public notification of UAS deployment during critical incidents. • Developing an operational protocol governing the deployment and operation of a UAS including, but not limited to, safety oversight, use of visual observers, establishment of lost link procedures and secure communication with air traffic control facilities. • Developing a protocol for fully documenting all deployments. • Developing a UAS inspection, maintenance and record-keeping protocol to ensure continuing airworthiness of a UAS, up to and including its overhaul or life limits. • Developing protocols to ensure that all data intended to be used as evidence are accessed, maintained, stored and retrieved in a manner that ensures its integrity as evidence, including strict adherence to chain of custody requirements. Electronic trails, including encryption, authenticity certificates and date and time stamping, shall be used as appropriate to preserve individual rights and to ensure the authenticity and maintenance of a secure evidentiary chain of custody. • Developing protocols that ensure retention and purge periods are maintained in accordance with established records retention schedules. • Facilitating law enforcement access to images and data captured by the UAS. • Recommending program enhancements, particularly regarding safety and information security. • Ensuring that established protocols are followed by monitoring and providing periodic reports on the program to the Chief of Police. USE OF UAS Only authorized operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate the UAS. The UAS is intended to be used as a tool to enhance police response to calls for service. The UAS will assist responding officers with situational awareness and other safety concerns. Policy O3.73 Page 3 of 3 Use of vision enhancement technology (e.g., thermal and other imaging equipment not generally available to the public) is permissible in viewing areas only where there is no protectable privacy interest or when in compliance with a search warrant or court order. In all other instances, legal counsel should be consulted. UAS operations should only be conducted within FAA regulations. PROHIBITED USE The UAS video surveillance equipment shall not be used: • To conduct random surveillance activities. • To target a person based solely on actual or perceived characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, economic status, age, cultural group, or disability. • To harass, intimidate, or discriminate against any individual or group. • To conduct personal business of any type. • The UAS shall not be weaponized. RETENTION OF UAS DATA Data collected by the UAS shall be retained as provided in the established records retention schedule. APPROVED: Paul LeBaron Chief of Police City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0103 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 2020 LOCAL AGENCY BIENNIAL NOTICE REGARDING THE CITY’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE (City Clerk Eduardo Sarmiento) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving and adopting the amended Conflict of Interest Code pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974. Executive Summary: Pursuant to the Political Reform Act (the “Act”),the City Council directed staff to:(1)conduct a review of the City’s Conflict of Interest Code (“Code”)to determine if a change in the Code was necessary; (2)file a biennial notice regarding the results of the review no later than required deadline;and (3) amend the City’s Code pursuant to the act, if necessary. During the review process,staff found that updates and amendments to the City’s Conflict of Interest Code were necessary. A legislative version of the proposed amended Code is attached. Background: The Political Reform Act of 1974,Government Code Section 81000 et seq.(the “Act”),requires all public agencies to adopt and maintain a Conflict of Interest Code.The Act further requires that agencies regularly review and update their Codes as necessary as directed by the code-reviewing body or when change is necessitated by changed circumstances (Sections 87306 and 87306.5).The City Council is the City’s code-reviewing body.As the code-reviewing body,the City Council directed that the Code be reviewed as required under the Act.During this review,staff found that amendments to the Code are necessary. Attached is a redlined legislative version of the proposed amended Code.The proposed revisions are based on:the establishment and recognition of new positions that must be designated;the revision of titles of existing positions;the revision of disclosure categories;the deletion of titles of positions that had been abolished and/or positions that no longer make or participate in making governmental decisions;the inclusion of language regarding e-filing with the FPPC;declaration of officials who must file pursuant to Section 87200 of the Political Reform Act,including officials who manage public investments;and declaration of those that shall review ethics training as required pursuant to City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0103 Government Code section 523235 (AB 1234). Attachments: 1.2020 Conflict of Interest Code 2.2020 Legislative Version of Proposed Amended Conflict of Interest Code. 3.Resolution of adoption of 2020 Conflict of Interest Code 4.2020 Local Agency Biennial Notice Submitted by: Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Concur: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 65270.00001\33390535.3 BBK – December 2020 CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 65270.00001\33390535.3 - 1 - BBK – December 2020 CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (Amended February 9, 2021) The Political Reform Act (Gov. Code § 81000, et seq.) requires state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest codes. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation (2 Cal. Code Regs. § 18730) that contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code which can be incorporated by reference in an agency’s code. After public notice and hearing Section 18730 may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission to conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act. Therefore, the terms of 2 California Code of Regulations section 18730 and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission are hereby incorporated by reference. This incorporation page, Regulation 18730 and the attached Appendix designating positions and establishing disclosure categories, shall constitute the conflict of interest code of the City of Hermosa Beach (the "City"). The Mayor, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney and the City Treasurer, shall electronically file their annual statements of economic interests directly with the Fair Political Practices Commission. All other officials and designated positions required to submit a statement of economic interests shall file their statements with the City Clerk as the City’s Filing Officer. The City Clerk shall retain the original statements filed by all other officials and designated positions and will make all retained statements available for public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours. (Gov. Code § 81008.) All officials and designated positions required to submit a statement of economic interests shall receive ethics training as required pursuant to Government Code section 53235 (AB 1234). The City’s Filing Officer shall annually provide all filers with information on training available to meet the requirements of Section 53235, and maintain required records indicating the dates that filers satisfied the training requirements and the entity that provided the training. These records shall be retained for five years after the date of training and are public records subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act. (Gov. Code § 53235.2.) LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 65270.00001\33390535.3 App. A-1- BBK – December2020 APPENDIX CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (Amended February 9, 2021) PART “A” The Mayor, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney, the City Treasurer, and all Other City Officials who manage public investments, as defined by 2 Cal. Code of Regs. §18700.3, are NOT subject to the City’s Code but must file disclosure statements under Government Code section 87200 et seq. [Regs. § 18730(b)(3)] OFFICIALS WHO MANAGE PUBLIC INVESTMENTS It has been determined that the positions listed below are Other City Officials who manage public investments1. These positions are listed here for informational purposes only. Finance Director Accounting Manager 1 Individuals holding one of the above-listed positions may contact the Fair Political Practices Commission for assistance or written advice regarding their filing obligations if they believe that their position has been categorized incorrectly. The Fair Political Practices Commission makes the final determination whether a position is covered by § 87200. LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 65270.00001\33390535.3 App. A-1- BBK – December 2020 DESIGNATED POSITIONS GOVERNED BY THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE Administrative Review Investigator 5 Assistant City Attorney (not filing under GC 87200) 1, 2 Assistant City Prosecutor 1, 2 Assistant Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6 Assistant to the City Manager 4, 7 Associate Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6 Associate Planner 1, 2 Building Inspector 2, 3, 5, 6 City Clerk 5 City Prosecutor 1, 2 Code Enforcement Officer 2, 3, 5, 6 Community Development Director 2, 3, 5, 6 Community Resources Manager 2, 5, 6 Community Services Division Manager 5 Deputy City Clerk 5 Deputy City Engineer 2, 3, 4, 6 Deputy City Manager 1, 2 Emergency Management Coordinator 4, 7 Environmental Analyst 3, 5, 7 Finance Cashier Supervisor 4, 7 Human Resources Manager 5 Management Analyst 4, 7 Personnel Analyst 5 Planning Assistant 5, 6 Planning Manager 1, 2 DESIGNATED POSITION’ TITLE OR FUNCTION DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES ASSIGNED LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP DESIGNATED POSITION’ TITLE OR FUNCTION DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES ASSIGNED 65270.00001\33390535.3 App. A-2 BBK – December 2020 Police Captain 5 Police Chief 5, 6 Police Lieutenant 5 Public Works Director/City Engineer 2, 3, 4, 6 Public Works Inspector 2, 3, 4, 6 Recreation Coordinator 5 Senior Building Inspector 2, 3, 5, 6 Senior Recreation Supervisor 5 Works Superintendent 2, 3, 4, 6 MEMBERS OF BOARDS, COMMITTEES & COMMISSIONS Board of Appeals 1, 2 Civil Services Board 1, 2 Parks, Recreation & Community Resources Commission 1, 2 Public Works Commission 1, 2 Consultants and New Positions2 2 Individuals serving as a consultant as defined in FPPC Reg. 18700.3 or in a new position created since this Code was last approved that make or participate in making decisions must file under the broadest disclosure set forth in this Code subject to the following limitation: The City Manager may determine that, due to the range of duties or contractual obligations, it is more appropriate to assign a limited disclosure requirement. A clear explanation of the duties and a statement of the extent of the disclosure requirements must be in a written document. (Gov. Code §. 82019; FPPC Regs. 18219 and 18734.). The City Manager’s determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. (Gov. Code §. 81008.) LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 65270.00001\33390535.3 App. B-1 BBK – December 2020 PART ”B” DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES The disclosure ca tegories listed below identify the types of economic interests that the designated position must disclose for each disclosure category to which he or she is assigned.3 Such economic interests are reportable if they are either located in or doing business in the jurisdiction, are planning to do business in the jurisdiction, or have done business during the previous two years in the jurisdiction of the City. Category 1: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, inclu ding gifts, loans and travel payments, that are located in, do business in or own real property within the jurisdiction of the City . Category 2: All interests in real property which is located in whole or in part within, or not more than two (2) miles outside, the boundaries of the City, including any leasehold, beneficial or ownership interest or option to acquire property. Category 3: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income , including gifts, loans and travel pa yments, that are engaged in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property within the jurisdiction of the City. Category 4: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income , including gifts, lo ans and travel payments, that provide services, products, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the City. Category 5: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income , including gift s, loans and travel payments, that provide services, products, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the designated position’s department, unit or division. Category 6: All investments and business positions in busin ess entities, and sources of income , including gifts, loans and travel payments, subject to the regulatory, permit, or licensing authority of the designated employee's department, unit or division. Category 7: All investments and business positions in b usiness entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, or income from a nonprofit organization, if the source is of the type to receive grants or other monies from or through the City or its subdivisions. 3 This Conflict of Interest Code does not require the reporting of gifts from outside this agency’s jurisdiction if the source does not have some connection with or bearing upon the functions or duties of the position. (Reg. 18730.1) LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 65270.00001\33390535.2 BBK – December 2020 LEGISLATIVE VERSION (SHOWS CHANGES MADE) CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 65270.00001\33390535.2 - 1 - BBK – December 2020 CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (Amended October 23, 2018 February 9, 2021) The Political Reform Act (Gov. Code § 81000, et seq.) requires state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest codes. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation (2 Cal. Code Regs. § 18730) that contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code which can be incorporated by reference in an agency’s code. After public notice and hearing Section 18730 may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission to conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act. Therefore, the terms of 2 California Code of Regulations section 18730 and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission are hereby incorporated by reference. This incorporation page, Regulation 18730 and the attached Appendix designating positions and establishing disclosure categories, shall constitute the conflict of interest code of the City of Hermosa Beach (the "City"). The Mayor, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney and the City Treasurer, shall electronically file their annual statements of economic interests directly with the Fair Political Practices Commission.All other officials and designated positions required to submit a statement of economic interests shall file their statements with the City Clerk as the City’s Filing Officer. The City Clerk shall make and retain a copy of all statements filed by the Mayor, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney and the City Treasurer, and forward the originals of such statements to the Fair Political Practices Commission. The City Clerk shall retain the original statements filed by all other officials and designated positions and will make all retained statements available for public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours. (Gov. Code § 81008.) All officials and designated positions required to submit a statement of economic interests shall receive ethics training as required pursuant to Government Code section 53235 (AB 1234). The City’s Filing Officer shall annually provide all filers with information on training available to meet the requirements of Section 53235, and maintain required records indicating the dates that filers satisfied the training requirements and the entity that provided the training. These records shall be retained for five years after the date of training and are public records subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act. (Gov. Code § 53235.2.) LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 65270.00001\33390535.2 App. A-1- BBK – December2020 APPENDIX CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (Amended October 23, 2018 February 9, 2021) PART “A” The Mayor, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney, the City Treasurer, and all Other City Officials who manage public investments, as defined by 2 Cal. Code of Regs. §18700.3, are NOT subject to the City’s Code but must file disclosure statements under Government Code section 87200 et seq. [Regs. § 18730(b)(3)] OFFICIALS WHO MANAGE PUBLIC INVESTMENTS It has been determined that the positions listed below are Other City Officials who manage public investments1. These positions are listed here for informational purposes only. Finance Director Accounting Manager 1 Individuals holding one of the above-listed positions may contact the Fair Political Practices Commission for assistance or written advice regarding their filing obligations if they believe that their position has been categorized incorrectly. The Fair Political Practices Commission makes the final determination whether a position is covered by § 87200. LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 65270.00001\33390535.2 App. A-1- BBK – December 2020 DESIGNATED POSITIONS GOVERNED BY THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE [For ease of reference the positions have been listed alphabetically and separation of departments have been removed] Administrative Review Investigator 5 Assistant City Attorney (not filing under GC 87200) 1, 2 Assistant City Prosecutor 1, 2 Assistant Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6 Assistant to the City Manager 4, 7 Associate Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6 Associate Planner 1, 2 Building Inspector 2, 3, 5, 6 City Clerk 5 City Prosecutor 1, 2 Code Enforcement Officer 2, 3, 5, 6 Community Development Director 2, 3, 5, 6 Community Resources Manager 2, 5, 6 Community Services Division Manager 5 Deputy City Clerk 5 Deputy City Engineer 2, 3, 4, 6 Deputy City Manager 1, 2 Emergency Management Coordinator 4, 7 Environmental Analyst 3, 5, 7 Finance Cashier Supervisor 4, 7 Hearing Officer (part-time) [Consultant position does not need to be designated] 1, 2 Human Resources Manager 5 Management Analyst 4, 7 Personnel Analyst 5 DESIGNATED POSITION’ TITLE OR FUNCTION DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES ASSIGNED LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP DESIGNATED POSITION’ TITLE OR FUNCTION DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES ASSIGNED 65270.00001\33390535.2 App. A-2 BBK – December 2020 Planning Assistant 5, 6 Planning Manager 1, 2 Police Captain 5 Police Chief 2 , 5, 6 Police Lieutenant 5 Public Works Director/City Engineer 2, 3, 4, 6 Public Works Inspector 2, 3, 4, 6 Recreation Coordinator 5 Senior Building Inspector 2, 3, 5, 6 Senior Recreation Supervisor 5 Works Superintendent 2, 3, 4, 6 MEMBERS OF BOARDS, COMMITTEES & COMMISSIONS Board of Appeals 1, 2 Civil Services Board 1, 2 Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission 1, 2 Parks, Recreation & Community Resources Commission 1, 2 Public Works Commission 1, 2 Consultants and New Positions2 2 Individuals serving as a consultant as defined in FPPC Reg. 18700.3 or in a new position created since this Code was last approved that make or participate in making decisions must file under the broadest disclosure set forth in this Code subject to the following limitation: The City Manager may determine that, due to the range of duties or contractual obligations, it is more appropriate to assign a limited disclosure requirement. A clear explanation of the duties and a statement of the extent of the disclosure requirements must be in a written document. (Gov. Code §. 82019; FPPC Regs. 18219 and 18734.). The City Manager’s determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. (Gov. Code §. 81008.) LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 65270.00001\33390535.2 App. B-1 BBK – December 2020 PART ”B” DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES The disclosure categories listed below identify the types of economic interests that the designated position must disclose for each disclosure category to which he or she is assigned.3 Such economic interests are reportable if they are either located in or doing business in the jurisdiction, are planning to do business in the jurisdiction, or have done business during the previous two years in the jurisdiction of the City. Category 1: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that are located in, do business in or own real property within the jurisdiction of the City. Category 2: All interests in real property which is located in whole or in part within, or not more than two (2) miles outside, the boundaries of the City, including any leasehold, beneficial or ownership interest or option to acquire property. Category 3: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that are engaged in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property within the jurisdiction of the City. Category 4: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that provide services, products, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the City. Category 5: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that provide services, products, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the designated position’s department, unit or division. Category 6: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, subject to the regulatory, permit, or licensing authority of the designated employee's department, unit or division. Category 7: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, or income from a nonprofit organization, if the source is of the type to receive grants or other monies from or through the City or its subdivisions. 3 This Conflict of Interest Code does not require the reporting of gifts from outside this agency’s jurisdiction if the source does not have some connection with or bearing upon the functions or duties of the position. (Reg. 18730.1) 65270.00001\33501953.1 RESOLUTION NO. _____ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING AN AMENDED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE PURSUANT TO THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1974 WHEREAS, the State of California enacted the Political Reform Act of 1974, Government Code Section 81000 et seq. (the “Act”), which contains provisions relating to conflicts of interest which potentially affect all officers, employees and consultants of the City of Hermosa Beach (the “City”) and requires all public agencies to adopt and promulgate a Conflict of Interest Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Conflict of Interest Code (the “Code”) in compliance with the Act which was last amended October 23, 2018; and WHEREAS, subsequent changed circumstances within the City have made it advisable and necessary pursuant to Sections 87306 and 87307 of the Act to amend and update the City’s Code; and WHEREAS, the potential penalties for violation of the provisions of the Act are substantial and may include criminal and civil liability, as well as equitable relief which could result in the City being restrained or prevented from acting in cases where the provisions of the Act may have been violated; and WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of a public meeting on, and of consideration by the City Council of, the proposed amended Code was provided each affected designated employee and publicly posted for review; and WHEREAS, a public meeting was held upon the proposed amended Code at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 9, 2021, at which all present were given an opportunity to be heard on the proposed amended Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach that: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby adopt the proposed amended Conflict of Interest Code, a copy of which is attached hereto and shall be on file with the City Clerk and available to the public for inspection and copying during regular business hours; and SECTION 2. The said amended Conflict of Interest Code shall become effective immediately after the date of its adoption and approval. 2 65270.00001\33501953.1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach at a regular meeting held this 9th day of February, 2021 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _________________________________________ _________________________, MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________________ ___________________, CITY CLERK __________________________________________ _________________________ 2020 Local Agency Biennial Notice Name of Agency: Mailing Address: Contact Person: Phone No. Email: Alternate Email: Accurate disclosure is essential to monitor whether officials have conflicts of interest and to help ensure public trust in government. The biennial review examines current programs to ensure that the agency’s code includes disclosure by those agency officials who make or participate in making governmental decisions. This agency has reviewed its conflict of interest code and has determined that (check one BOX): ❑An amendment is required. The following amendments are necessary: (Check all that apply.) Include new positions Revise disclosure categories Revise the titles of existing positions Delete titles of positions that have been abolished and/or positions that no longer make or participate in making governmental decisions Other (describe) ❑The code is currently under review by the code reviewing body. ❑No amendment is required. (If your code is over five years old, amendments may be necessary.) Verification (to be completed if no amendment is required) This agency’s code accurately designates all positions that make or participate in the maki ng of governmental decisions. The disclosure assigned to those positions accurately requires that all investments, business positions, interests in real property, and sources of income that may foreseeably be affected materially by the decisions made by those holding designated positions are reported. The code includes all other provisions required by Government Code Section 87302. Signature of Chief Executive Officer Date All agencies must complete and return this notice regardless of how recently your code was approved or amended. Please return this notice no later than October 1, 2020, or by the date specified by your agency, if earlier, to: (PLACE RETURN ADDRESS OF CODE REVIEWING BODY HERE) PLEASE DO NOT RETURN THIS FORM TO THE FPPC. www.fppc.ca.gov FPPC Advice: advice@fppc.ca.gov (866.275.3772) Page 1 of 1 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0105 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 COUNCILMEMBERS ARMATO AND CAMPBELL REQUEST THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADD TO THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AN ITEM TO CONSIDER SUBMITTING A COMMENT LETTER FOR THE LAX LANDSIDE ACCESS MODERNIZATION PROGRAM DRAFT EIR City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 1 SBCCOG Board of Director’s Briefing January 28, 2021 2 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 33 PROJECT ELEMENTS Airfield Improvements Terminal Improvements Roadway Improvements ▪Improves runway exit configurations to enhance safety and meet FAA design standards ▪Extends taxiways to better manage airfield operations and to meet FAA standards Reduces airfield wait times and reduces aircraft idling, decreasing air pollutant emissions ▪Adds Concourse 0 as an easterly extension of Terminal 1 ▪Adds Terminal 9, with a passenger bridge connection to Terminal 8 ▪Replaces most of the West Remote Gates Provides new, state-of-the-art facilities that will improve the passenger experience ▪Reconfigures the roadways used to enter and exit the airport terminals, and creates direct roadway access for Terminal 9 ▪Reduces congestion on public thoroughfares and neighborhood streets ▪Adds a new Automated People Mover train station at Terminal 9 Redirects airport traffic from local streets to new dedicated roadways 4 AIRFIELD IMPROVEMENTS Airfield Improvements North Airfield Runway Exit Improvements North Airfield Taxiway Improvements –West End ▪Reconfigure taxiways to meet current FAA design standards ▪Improve the runway exit configurations to enhance the safety of aircraft crossings and improve pilot visibility ▪Extend taxiways to improve airfield efficiency and accommodate the new Concourse 0 and Terminal 9 5 CONCOURSE 0 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN Concourse 0 Conceptual Site Plan ▪11 gates (two would be removed for a total of 9 net new gates) for mid-size aircraft ▪Between 750,000 and 1.2 million square feet in size (optional office space above the concourse facilities) ▪International capability (Federal Inspection Services) ▪Pedestrian corridor to future East Central Terminal Area Automated People Mover station ▪No curb access -passengers would be processed through Terminal 1 Concourse 0 6 TERMINAL 9 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN Terminal 9 Terminal 9 Conceptual Site Plan ▪12 gates for large aircraft ▪Up to 1.5 million square feet in size ▪International capability (Federal Inspection Services) ▪Pedestrian corridor to new Automated People Mover station ▪Pedestrian corridor to Terminal 8 in the Central Terminal Area (CTA) over Sepulveda Boulevard ▪Parking facility ▪Access to/from roadway system 7 CONCEPTUAL VIEW OF ROADWAY SYSTEM Conceptual View of Roadways ▪Aerial view from Sepulveda Blvd. south of Lincoln Blvd., looking southeast across proposed roadway system ▪Illustrates new elevated roadways providing access to and from the Central Terminal Area ▪Automated People Mover (currently under construction) is shown on the left ▪Concourse 0 is shown on the right side of the image ▪Terminal 9 is shown in the background, south of Century Blvd. and to the left of Terminal 8 8 CONCEPTUAL VIEW OF ROADWAY SYSTEM Conceptual View of Roadways ▪Aerial view looking southwest across proposed roadway system from 96th St. between Vicksburg Ave. and Jenny Ave. ▪This view shows the elevated roadways that would provide access to and from the Central Terminal Area (CTA), away from the existing bottleneck around Sepulveda Blvd. and Century Blvd. ▪Terminal 9 is in the background on the left side of the image, and Concourse 0 can be seen on the right 9 ▪Reduces busing from remote gates ▪Contact gates provide a better passenger experience ▪More seating, concessions, and retail ▪Seamless transition between international and domestic flights ▪Reduces traffic congestion ▪Promotes sustainability ▪Less aircraft idling improves air quality ▪Connection to the Automated People Mover train and regional mass transit ▪Enhances operational management which reduces delays and enhances safety ▪Reduces airfield wait times ▪Removes most of the remote gates ▪Improves taxiways ▪Enhances aircraft movement ▪Promotes local jobs during construction and operations ▪Provides additional concessions (restaurants and shops) ▪Increases business opportunities for local and small businesses Improves Passenger Experience Improves Community Experience Enhances Safety & Carrier Experience Increases Business Opportunities KEY PROJECT BENEFITS 1010 CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONAL JOBS ▪Over 6 billion dollars for Project construction ▪Creation of short-term employment opportunities during Project construction and long-term employment opportunities once the Project begins operations ▪Creation of local and small business opportunities during both the construction and the operation periods Timeframe: 2021 –2028 Types: ▪Terminal, Concourse, Airfield, APM Facilities ▪Roadway Improvements ▪Inspections Construction Jobs Timeframe: 2028 + Types: ▪Concessions ▪Operations Operational Jobs Timeframe: 2021 –2028 + ▪LAWA First Source Hiring Program ▪Local and Small Business Participation Goals Increased Local and Small Business Opportunities Photo courtesy of Los Angeles World Airports Photo courtesy of Los Angeles World Airports 1111 CEQA Process 1212 PRELIMINARY EIR RESULTS 1313 AIR QUALITY AND GHG EMISSIONS ANALYSIS ▪GHG Emissions •GHG emissions from construction and operations would be higher than current emissions levels, resulting in a significant impact •Most of the increase in GHG emissions would result from increased aircraft operations, over which LAWA has no authority and which would be the same in 2028 with or without the Project ▪Air Quality •Construction would result in significant impacts from construction activities and from temporary runway closures •Project would result in significant impacts from aircraft operations, vehicle traffic, and roadway dust •Most of increase in emissions would result from increased aircraft operations, over which LAWA has little or no authority and which would be the same in 2028 with or without the Project What We Found ▪Construction: Emissions from construction equipment and emissions during runway closures ▪Operations: Air pollutant emissions from operations at Project buildout in 2028 What We Studied 1414 AIR QUALITY AND GHG EMISSIONS ANALYSIS Photo courtesy of Los Angeles World Airports Photo courtesy of Los Angeles World Airports Air Quality and GHG Mitigation Measures ▪LAWA identified the following measures to reduce impacts from air quality and GHG emissions: •Use an on-site rock crushing operation (located away from residential areas) •Use renewable diesel fuel in construction equipment •Provide cool roof treatment on Terminal 9 parking facility to reduce energy use •Update LAWA’s Electric Vehicle (EV) Purchasing Policy •Include additional EV charging stations in the Terminal 9 parking facility •Implement solar energy technology, where feasible 1515 AIR QUALITY AND GHG EMISSIONS ANALYSIS Photo courtesy of Los Angeles World Airports Photo courtesy of Los Angeles World Airports Additional GHG Mitigation Measures ▪LAWA identified additional measures to address impacts from GHG emissions. These measures focus on reducing waste and reusing resources, which contribute to lower GHG emissions: •Require contractors to recycle or salvage a minimum of 85 percent of construction and demolition waste •Implement LAWA’s Organic Waste Collection Program at Concourse 0 and Terminal 9 •Adopt a Green Procurement Policy for LAX •Enhance LAWA’s existing recycling program and include tenant diversion goals •Use only non-potable water for Project landscaping ▪Even with mitigation, construction and operational air quality and GHG emissions impacts cannot be reduced to levels below the significance thresholds 1616 NOISE ANALYSIS Photo courtesy of Jay Berkowitz Photo courtesy of Los Angeles World Airports Photo courtesy of Los Angeles World Airports What We Studied ▪Noise from aircraft due to temporary runway closures during construction and long- term operations ▪Noise from roadway traffic ▪Noise from construction traffic and construction equipment ▪Vibration from construction equipment 1717 AIRCRAFT NOISE ANALYSIS Short-Term Aircraft Noise Impacts ▪Short-term closures of the north airfield runways during construction cause a temporary, significant aircraft noise impact during the runway closures (approximately 4.5 months in duration for each of the two north airfield runways) Short-Term Aircraft Noise Mitigation Measures ▪No mitigation measures are available to mitigate temporary aircraft noise impacts ▪Short term impacts would be significant What We Found Long-Term Aircraft Noise Impacts ▪Long-term increases in aircraft noise are projected to occur 2 to 5 miles east of LAX due to an increase in future aircraft operations, which is forecasted to occur with or without the proposed Project Long-Term Aircraft Noise Mitigation Measures ▪Update the LAX Noise Exposure Map (NEM) prior to Project completion Continue to work with FAA and appropriate jurisdictions on Sound Insulation Programs for eligible noise-sensitive uses newly exposed to noise levels that are above the standards 1818 CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS Photo courtesy of Los Angeles World Airports Construction Noise -What We Found ▪The proposed Project would have a significant, but mitigable, impact on nearby hotels during construction from construction- related equipment noise ▪The proposed Project would not have a significant noise impact on homes or residences ▪Impacts from construction-related traffic and vibration would be less than significant Construction Noise Mitigation Measures ▪Development of noise control plans for construction activities ▪Schedule noisiest on-site construction activities during the day, as feasible ▪Locate noisiest equipment away from sensitive land uses, as feasible ▪With mitigation, construction noise impacts would be less than significant 1919 TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS What We Studied ▪CEQA was revised in 2019 to shift focus of transportation analysis away from congestion (i.e., LOS) and instead towards Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), which better measures impacts to the environment (i.e., AQ/GHG)* ▪Following new State CEQA and LADOT guidelines, the impacts of additional Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) were evaluated in the Draft EIR ▪VMT considers number of vehicle trips and trip length ▪VMT analysis evaluated: •Employee VMT •Passenger VMT •Induced VMT ▪A Project Travel Demand Model was developed to calculate impacts Image courtesy of Fehr & Peers 2020 TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS Image courtesy of CDM Smith Photo courtesy of Los Angeles World Airports What We Found ▪Significant VMT impacts would be generated as a result of: •Additional employees traveling to Concourse 0 and Terminal 9 for work (these impacts would be less than significant with mitigation) •Increased passenger trip lengths along the new, dedicated airport roadway system •The redirection of airport traffic to the new roadway system may induce more short- term and long-term local trips 2121 TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS Transportation Mitigation Measures ▪LAWA will implement a comprehensive mitigation program to mitigate the VMT impacts from the Project ▪Components of the VMT Reduction Program include the following strategies: •Expand LAWA’s rideshare program •Formalize employee telecommuting program •Provide on-demand micro-transit shuttle •Market and promote alternative transportation options Adobe stock photo Photo courtesy of Los Angeles World Airports 2222 TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS Transportation Mitigation Measures (continued) ▪Additional strategies that could be implemented include the following: •Conduct study to price parking to reduce VMT •Expand employee incentives and commuter benefits including carpools, transit subsidies, guaranteed ride home, and vanpool support •Evaluate modifications to FlyAway service •Explore incentive measures from LAWA Mobility Strategic Plan, including airline partnerships for integrated ticketing and partnership with TSA for expedited screening for FlyAway and transit users •Evaluate congestion pricing in the CTA Adobe stock photo Photo courtesy of Los Angeles World Airports 23 CEQA PROCESS The Draft EIR for the LAX Airfield and Terminal Modernization Project was released on October 29, 2020 for public review and comment. LAWA will accept public comments on the Draft EIR until March 15, 2021. For more information please go to www.LAWA.org/ATMP 2424 Thank You El Segundo discussion items: Los Angeles World Airports - South Bay COG Background • Los Angeles World Airports is a quasi-independent agency of the City of Los Angeles. It is governed by a 7-member commission appointed by the LA Mayor. It runs LAX and Van Nuys Airport. • LAWA has been engaged in a massive expansion plan at LAX for the last 10 years. There are two major components to the expansion. o The first, which is approved and underway, is the LAMP, the Landside Access Modernization Plan. The main features of this plan are the people mover to connect the Crenshaw and Green light rail lines to the Central Terminal Area, which stops at new parking garages and a new consolidated rental car facility. o The second, is an expansion of the terminals. This plan is known as the Airfield Terminal Modernization Program. The main features of this plan are a new terminal, a new concourse, and a new satellite concourse, plus a plethora of new roadways to serve these new facilities. In addition, there are a few improvements and expansions to a variety of taxiways. • These improvements, taken together, will allow the airport to handle tens of millions of additional passengers per year. Accommodation or Inducement • LAWA has claimed for years that these expansion projects are simply an accommodation of growth that is coming to LAWA regardless of whether the projects are done or not. LAWA claims that the result of not doing the project is simply a bad passenger experience but that the growth would occur regardless. • However, this position belies logic. Of course, creating gleaming new facilities, improving access and significantly expanding capacity will induce growth in traffic. If you make it easy to use LAX, there is less incentive to use the many alternative airports in the region. • But this is not a simply philosophical argument. By taking the position that they are not “inducing” growth, LAWA may claim under CEQA that the project does not require mitigations for the impacts, because the Project, in and of itself, does not produce any. LAWA is using a legal fiction to avoid the impacts of its expansion projects. Impacts of Growth • This growth in air traffic will result in similar increases in air pollution, noise, and traffic, putting additional stress on roads in and around the airport, including the 405, Sepulveda, La Cienega, and Aviation. Noise and air pollution will affect the south Bay in varying degrees. • The brand new terminal (to be known as Terminal 9) will be primarily for the use of United Airlines and its Star alliance partners. The terminal will be massive, and will be the first terminal to be located east of Sepulveda Boulevard, representing a serious expansion of the central terminal area footprint. It will be located on the south side of Century Boulevard. It will be accessed from Century Boulevard, but LAWA is planning on providing temporary access from Sepulveda as well. • The new concourse is also a very large facility. Known as Concourse 0, it will be attached to Terminal 1 (the Southwest Airlines Terminal) and will not have direct access from the CTA road. In order to build this the access road to the upper and lower levels from southbound Sepulveda will be demolished and the concourse will be built on that land, plus all of the old Park One lot (which has been closed for a year or two). • The planned Concourse 0 and Terminal 9 will receive reallocated, lightly used, gates currently located midfield and create high utilization, high capacity, gates in the main area. • In addition, there is a project called the Midfield Satellite Concourse, which will provide additional capacity, especially for international travelers. • The expansion will have major impacts on the residents of the City of El Segundo and the surrounding communities. • The Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Project was released in November, and comments are due next month. Mitigation of Impacts • In addition to the legal fiction of “accommodation” versus “inducing” of growth, LAWA is also using the shift in state law from Level Of Service (LOS) to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) to claim that it cannot study impacts to intersections throughout the South Bay. Again, the addition of 10 of millions of passengers annually will undoubtedly negatively impact the South Bay. • Regardless of whether it is technically required under CEQA or NEPA, LAWA needs to consider ways to address these unavoidable traffic impacts. • Potential ideas could be to improve the Flyaway system and to implement a Transportation Management Organization for the South Bay (especially for airport-related employment) Cargo • While not specifically addressed in this project, the south Bay should be deeply concerned about LAWA’s plans to increase its cargo operations, which bring additional air traffic (with noise and pollution), and significant truck traffic. • Increased cargo operations are not compatible with the densely populated Westside and South Bay, and LAWA should seriously consider discouraging cargo growth at LAX. Other airports in the region, especially Ontario International, are better suited to serve not only the national goods movement market, Southern California as well. Next Steps • El Segundo is preparing a detailed comment letter to express its concerns about the project and has been negotiating with LAWA on changes El Segundo would like to see. • It is our understanding that the Los Angeles Department of Transportation is conducting a project review of the ATMP and that the Westchester Neighborhood Council has requested a 60-day extension of the DEIR comment period in order to have the benefit of that review. El Segundo believes this extension makes sense and that the COG should also echo that extension request. • As you know, LAWA is a powerful and well-funded organization. Significantly, even with airline traffic continuing to be down by more than half since the start of the pandemic, LAWA is moving full-speed ahead with environmentally clearing this project. It is not clear how the pandemic will affect construction schedules. • Both the LAMP project and the ATMP appear to be much more concerned about traffic on the southbound 405 than with the northbound 405 or the westbound 105. There are very few improvements to access to the LAMP facilities or the new terminals from the northbound 405. • El Segundo is particularly concerned about congestion on the 405, Sepulveda/PCH (including the Sepulveda Tunnel), Aviation, and other north-south routes. In particular, El Segundo is concerned that LAWA will attempt to open the new United Terminal 9 prior to the completion of the associated roadway network. • It is not clear that, given the pandemic, that these projects are in fact necessary at this time. Terminal 9, in particular, seems outsized and potentially unnecessary. LAWA should consider scaling back or eliminating Terminal 9. • In addition, El Segundo would prefer that Southwest Concourse 0 be constructed first, and Terminal 9 go second. • If Terminal 9 is built, it is critical that the roadways intended to serve the project be completed and opened before Terminal is opened to operations. This would eliminate the need for any access from Sepulveda and would ensure that the Sepulveda Tunnel and other local streets are not subjected to frequent gridlock conditions. • Finally, El Segundo is very concerned about construction impacts, including haul routes, and wants such haul routes to avoid El Segundo and the South Bay as much as possible. City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0104 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information. Attachments: Tentative Future Agenda Items City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ February 4, 2021 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 9, 2021 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS FEBRURARY 23, 2021 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION FEBRUARY 23, 2021 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT CITY MANAGER REPORTS COVID-19 Update Update from Chief LeBaron on COVID-19 Emergency Enforcement Measures CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS Updates from City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees and Standing Committee Delegates/Alternates CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Finance Director Ongoing Revenue Report, Expenditure Report and CIP Report by Project Finance Director Ongoing Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) Finance Director Annual City Treasurer’s Report and Cash Balance Report City Treasurer Ongoing Cancellation of Certain Checks City Treasurer Ongoing Public Works Project Status Report Public Works Director Ongoing Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Items Community Development Director Ongoing South Bay Workforce Investment Board Quarterly Summary Chris Cagle Quarterly PUBLIC HEARINGS – 6:30 PM Parking Plan 20-4 request to allow medical clinic/office uses at an existing multi-tenant commercial building (Pacific Plaza Offices) located at 2200 Pacific Coast Highway based on use of up to 40 shared parking spaces with 2420 Pacific Coast Highway (Hope Chapel); and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Community Development Director Council Direction Jan. 12, 2021 MUNICIPAL MATTERS Midyear Budget Review for Fiscal Year 2020–21 Finance Director Annual Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan Implementation Environmental Analyst Staff Request Jan. 7, 2021 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Tentative Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing 2 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 3, 2021 @ 6:00 PM JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION: ZONING CODE UPDATE MARCH 9, 2021 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION MARCH 9, 2021 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT CITY MANAGER REPORTS COVID-19 Update Update from Chief LeBaron on COVID-19 Emergency Enforcement Measures CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS Updates from City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees and Standing Committee Delegates/Alternates CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Finance Director Ongoing Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of February 2, 2021 Community Resources Manager Ongoing Los Angeles Fire Services and McCormick Ambulance Monthly Report for January 2021 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing PUBLIC HEARINGS – 6:30 PM Mandatory Organics Recycling Ordinance Environmental Programs Manager Staff Request Jan 11, 2021 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing 3 THURSDAY, MARCH 18, 2021 @ 6:00 PM JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND SCHOOL BOARD MEETING MARCH 23, 2021 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION MARCH 23, 2021 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT CITY MANAGER REPORTS COVID-19 Update Update from Chief LeBaron on COVID-19 Emergency Enforcement Measures Update from Jim Fasola – City Delegate to the Los Angeles County West Vector & Vector-Borne Disease Control District Board of Trustees CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS Updates from City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees and Standing Committee Delegates/Alternates CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Finance Director Ongoing Revenue Report, Expenditure Report and CIP Report by Project Finance Director Ongoing City Treasurer’s Report and Cash Balance Report City Treasurer Ongoing Cancellation of Certain Checks City Treasurer Ongoing Public Works Project Status Report Public Works Director Ongoing Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of January 20, 2021 Public Works Director Ongoing Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of March 16, 2021 Community Development Director Ongoing Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Items Community Development Director Ongoing MUNICIPAL MATTERS Leadership Hermosa Beach Class of 2021 Class Project City Manager Annual FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Tentative Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing 4 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 7, 2021 @ 6:00 PM STUDY SESSION APRIL 13, 2021 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION APRIL 13, 2021 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT CITY MANAGER REPORTS COVID-19 Update Update from Chief LeBaron on COVID-19 Emergency Enforcement Measures CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS Updates from City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees and Standing Committee Delegates/Alternates CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Finance Director Ongoing Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of March 2, 2021 Community Resources Manager Ongoing Los Angeles Fire Services and McCormick Ambulance Monthly Report for February 2021 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing Approval of Resolution authorizing the preparation of a report for the annual Levy of Assessments within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District during Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Public Works Director Annual MUNICIPAL MATTERS Board/Commission Vacancies – Upcoming expiration of three terms on the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission City Clerk 4-Year Terms FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing 5 PENDING STRATEGIC PLAN ITEMS STATUS / TENTATIVE MEETING DATE Update Personnel Policies Human Resources Manager Beach Policy/Regulations (Continued from meeting of October 27, 2016) Community Resources Manager On hold by Council Alternative Fuel Transportation Report, Nov. 2016 Environmental Analyst CCA Direction, Dec. 2016 Environmental Programs Manager PENDING NEW ITEMS STATUS / TENTATIVE MEETING DATE Consideration of re-establishing, on an as needed basis, both funding and discretion for the director of Public Works to contract services to pump major beach storm outfalls drains prior to anticipated major storm events (supported by Duclos, Armato and Petty) Initiated by: Other Matters Feb. 14, 2017 Public Works Director Staff to provide an update on storm drain maintenance and provide details on hydrodynamic separators (CIP 435) at the following CIP study session Policy discussion regarding city responsibilities and expectations when donations are made to city Initiated by: Council Direction May 24, 2017 Finance Director Will be discussed at the Revenue Strategy Study Session Approval of the Municipal Lease Policy Initiated by: Staff Request Jun. 12, 2018 Community Resources Manager Document Retention Policy Initiated by: Staff Request Nov. 28, 2018 City Clerk Pending City Clerk Appointment Consent for use of “Lot B” for construction staging area for Pier/Strand project Initiated by: Staff Request Dec. 17, 2018 Community Development Director On hold per developer Landscape and Street Lighting District Assessment Adjustment (mail-in election authorization) Initiated by: Council Direction Jul. 9, 2019 Public Works Director Add to Revenue Strategy Study Session Final Parcel Map No. 82295 for a two-unit residential condominium project at 1602 Loma Drive. Initiated by: Staff Request Oct. 10, 2019 Community Development Director Pending Coastal Development Permit Public Records Request Guidelines Initiated by: Staff Request Oct. 14, 2019 City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager Pending City Clerk Appointment Emergency Services Municipal Code Chapter 2.56 Update Initiated by: Staff Request Jan. 15, 2020 Emergency Management Coordinator Waiting for State to review proposed language changes Return to Council to discuss a full ban on tobacco sales and to include all available data related to other communities who have adopted complete bans. Initiated by: Council Direction Jan. 28, 2020 Community Development Director Council directed staff to bring item back in June 2021 Consideration of licensing agreement/fees for use of City logo Initiated by: Council Direction Jun. 9, 2020 City Attorney Discussion on Potential Establishment of a City Council Subcommittee Regarding City Finances (supported by Detoy, Armato, Fangary) Initiated by: Other Matters Jun. 9, 2020 Finance Director/Assistant to the City Manager Request to Renew the Agreement to Purchase Parking Meter Equipment and Related Services Initiated by: Staff Request August 11, 2020 Police Chief Follow-up on Mayor’s Pledge Initiated by: Council Direction August 25, 2020 City Manager’s Office/Police Chief Approval of First Amendment to Agreement with the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation for its Annual “Hearts of Hermosa” Event Initiated by: Staff Request December 7, 2020 Community Resources Manager Updating Resolution 15-6988, Rules for the Conduct of City Council Meetings. Initiated by: Staff Request Dec. 12, 2020 City Attorney/City Clerk