Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-09-2021 - Agenda Pkg - CC Regular MeetingTuesday, March 9, 2021 5:00 PM City of Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 City Council Mayor Justin Massey Mayor Pro Tem Michael Detoy Councilmembers Stacey Armato Mary Campbell Regular Meeting Agenda Closed Session - 5:00 PM Regular Meeting - 6:00 PM Duly Posted on March 4, 2021 at 10:40 p.m. by E.S. Executive Team Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Viki Copeland, Finance Director Marnell Gibson, Public Works Director Paul LeBaron, Chief of Police Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Vanessa Godinez, Human Resources Manager John Jones, Interim Community Resources Manager City Treasurer Karen Nowicki City Attorney Michael Jenkins Suja Lowenthal, Interim City Manager PLEASE NOTE: This is a full Packet including all pages and sub -pages, of all staff-reports and other materials of each agenda item as if physically stacked together and represents the complete agenda Packet as a single PDF file as of the date and time the agenda was initially posted (unless otherwise indicated here). It is meant to be an aid, but not intended as a replacement for the 'Living' agenda. This full Packet does not contain additions, modifications, or supplementals that have been added after the first posting of the 'Living' agenda unless indicated here. To prevent time downloading, and re-downloading, you might download this single PDF to your computer to have available for multiple reference, or to re -reference, to avoid the necessity of needing to be connected to the Internet or being held up by a slow-connection or slow server. For a particular item(s), you may desire to ensure that you are viewing all additions, modifications, or supplementals posted after the original agenda pack et's posting by utilizing the link to the 'Living' agenda as displayed on the city's website Agenda/Minutes page which for this agenda is: 03-09-21 Regular City Council Agenda Note again, that the agenda appearing below the following items' page number table may have changed and represents the page numbers to the agenda and materi als contained in this full agenda packet only. The agenda-items page number table below provides the starting page of each item in this full contiguous packet PDF file. To better utilize these page numbers, note that the Adobe Acrobat reader has a feature to display page thumb-nails down the left edge of your screen. With the page-thumbnails displayed you may click on a page's thumb - nail to immediately move to the item's starting page directly. Be aware, that as this full packet may include MINUTES of prior meetings, if searching the entire Packet for particular text, understand that when you find such text, that if it is within a MINUTES page of minutes, that are included in this agenda for approval, that it may appear to you that you are at an agenda item within the current agenda. Avoid such confusion by noting that pages that contain MINUTES included for approval are so identified at the top of each such page within this full packet. Agenda Item No. Starting Page Ending Page Agenda 116 COVID‐19 UPDATE BCHD 17 17 PROCLAMATION DECLARING MARCH 2021  AS AMERICAN RED CROSS MONTH IN  HERMOSA BEACH 18 18 CITY MANAGER REPORT COVID‐19 Update 19 19 WEST COAST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT  UPDATE 20 20 UPDATE FROM CHIEF LEBARON ON COVID‐ 19  EMERGENCY ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS 21 23 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION 24 24 UPDATES FROM AD HOC COMMITTEES 34 34 Consent Calendar 11a 35 48 11b 49 63 11c 64 73 11d 74 78 11e 79 83 11f 84 124 11g 125 138 PUBLIC HEARING 13a 139 242 13b 243 250 Municipal Matters 14a 251 255 14b 256 307 14c 308 323 14d 324 326 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 15a 327 332 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Packet March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda VIEWING OPTIONS FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS Public meetings are broadcast live on Spectrum Channel 8 and Frontier Channel 31 in Hermosa Beach. Additional viewing options are provided as a courtesy. ZOOM: Join the meeting link if available or participate by phone YOUTUBE CHANNEL: www.youtube.com/channel/UCaiZxw06ue-Tgc8DmXYzh2Q CITY WEBSITE: www.hermosabeach.gov and visit the Agendas/Minutes/Videos page ***PLEASE NOTE: IF YOU EXPERIENCE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES WHILE VIEWING THE MEETING ON ONE OF THESE PLATFORMS, PLEASE TRY ONE OF THE OTHER VIEWING OPTIONS*** Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA JOIN THE VIRTUAL MEETING AT: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87032785286?pwd=RGVVZnduNGVIVGJLOFlvaFNuYTBlUT09 OR PARTICIPATE BY PHONE: •Toll Free: 877-853-5257 •Meeting ID: 870 3278 5286, then # •Passcode: 513185 ATTENDEES WILL BE MUTED UNTIL THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PERIOD IS OPENED. If you are joining by phone, press * 6 to unmute your line. Comments from the public are limited to 3 minutes per speaker. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION a.21-0161 MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on January 12, 2021. b.21-0159 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Existing Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1) The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. a.King v. Hermosa Beach, et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: 20STCV19777 b.Hermosa Fitness LLC v. City of Hermosa Beach United States District Court, Case Number: 2:19-cv-08666-CAS-AFMx ADJOURNMENT OF CLOSED SESSION Page 3 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 6:00 P.M. - REGULAR AGENDA PUBLIC PARTICIPATION City Hall will be closed to the public until further notice. Virtual Meetings are held pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on March 17, 2020. Members of the public may email comments to Esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov or submit eComments until 4:00 p.m. on the meeting date. Members of the public may also participate by phone. JOIN THE VIRTUAL MEETING AT: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87032785286?pwd=RGVVZnduNGVIVGJLOFlvaFNuYTBlUT09 OR PARTICIPATE BY PHONE: •Toll Free: 877-853-5257 •Meeting ID: 870 3278 5286 •Participant ID: 513185 ATTENDEES WILL BE MUTED UNTIL THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PERIOD IS OPENED. If you are joining by phone, press * 6 to unmute your line. Comments from the public are limited to 3 minutes per speaker. Oral and Written Communication Persons who wish to have written materials included in the agenda packet at the time the agenda is published on the City's website must submit the written materials to the City Manager's office by email (esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov) or in person by noon of the Tuesday, one week before the meeting date. Written materials pertaining to matters listed on the posted agenda received after the agenda has been posted will be added as supplemental materials under the relevant agenda item on the City's website at the same time as they are distributed to the City Council by email. Supplemental materials may be submitted via eComment (instructions below) or emailed to esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov. Supplemental materials must be received before 4:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting to ensure Council and staff have the ability to review materials prior to the meeting. Supplemental materials submitted after 4:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting or submitted during the meeting will be posted online the next day. Submit Supplemental eComments in three easy steps: Note: Your comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information (i.e. phone numbers, addresses, etc) that you do not want to be published. 1. Go to the Agendas/Minutes/Video webpage and find the meeting you’d like to submit comments on. Click on the eComment button for your selected meeting. 2. Find the agenda item for which you would like to provide a comment. You can select a specific agenda item/project or provide general comments under the Oral/Written Communications item. 3. Sign in to your SpeakUp Hermosa Account or as a guest, enter your comment in the field provided, provide your name, and if applicable, attach files before submitting your comment. Page 4 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. CLOSED SESSION REPORT V. ANNOUNCEMENTS - UPCOMING CITY EVENTS VI. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:This is the time for the City Council to change the order in which it takes up items on this agenda, remove and/or continue agenda items and pull items from the consent calendar for separate consideration. VII. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS a.21-0148 COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT b.21-0149 PROCLAMATION DECLARING MARCH 2021 AS AMERICAN RED CROSS MONTH IN HERMOSA BEACH VIII. CITY MANAGER REPORT - The City Manager and staff may provide brief reports on pending City business. Longer oral reports to be provided are as follows: a.21-0151 COVID-19 UPDATE b.21-0153 WEST COAST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT UPDATE d.21-0152 UPDATE FROM CHIEF LEBARON ON COVID-19 EMERGENCY ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS SUPPLEMENTAL Email from Tony Higgins (Submitted 3-4-21 at 5.48 a.m.) Attachments: Page 5 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda IX. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -- ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC: This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction not on this agenda, on items on this agenda as to which public comment will not be taken (City Manager Reports, City Councilmember Reports Consent Calendar items that are not pulled for separate consideration and Future Agenda Items), on written communications, and to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar. Public comments on the agenda items called City Manager Reports, City Councilmembers Reports, Consent Calendar items that are not pulled for separate consideration and Future Agenda Items will only be heard at this time. Further, comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Members of the audience may also speak during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration; during Public Hearings; and, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. All comments from the public under this agenda item are limited to three minutes per speaker, but this time allotment may be reduced due to time constraints. The City Council acknowledges receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in oral and written communications, except that the Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda. Speakers with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are encouraged to submit those comments directly to the City Manager. a.21-0156 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council receive and file the written communication. 1. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION from Tony Higgins (Submitted 2-18-21 at 5.47 a.m.) 2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION from Tony Higgins (Submitted 2-27-21 at 7.46 a.m.) 3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION from Matt McCool (Submitted 3-2-21 at 11.51 a.m.) Attachments: X. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS: Councilmembers may briefly respond to public comments, may ask a question for clarification or make a brief announcement or report on his or her own activities or meetings attended. a.21-0154 UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES Page 6 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda XI. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following matters will be acted upon collectively with a single motion and vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. Councilmembers may orally register a negative vote on any consent calendar item without pulling the item for separate consideration prior to the vote on the consent calendar. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar, either under Approval of the Agenda or under this item prior to the vote on the consent calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item XII (12), with public comment permitted at that time. The title is deemed to be read and further reading waived of any ordinance listed on the consent calendar for introduction or adoption. a.REPORT 21-0155 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES (City Clerk Eduardo Sarmiento) Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council approve the following minutes: 1. March 03, 2021 Joint City Council and Planning Commission Meeting 2. February 23, 2021 Regular Meeting 3. September 29, 2020 Joint Meeting of the City Council and Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission 1. 03-03-21 Joint City Council & Planning Commission Mtg. Minutes 2. 02-23-21 Regular City Council Mtg. Minutes 3. 9-29-20 Joint City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission Mtg. Minutes Attachments: b.REPORT 21-0150 CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council ratify the following check registers. 1. 2-11-21 2. 2-18-21 Attachments: c.REPORT 21-0141 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE SERVICES AND AMBULANCE MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY 2021 (Emergency Management Coordinator Brandy Villanueva) Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council receive and file the January 2021 Fire and Ambulance monthly report. Fire and Ambulance Report for January 2021Attachments: d.REPORT 21-0143 ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 2, 2021 Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of February 2, 2021. PR Minutes 02.02.2021 UPDATEDAttachments: Page 7 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda e.REPORT 21-0165 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF RECLASSIFICATION OF PERSONNEL ANALYST TO HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST, CLASS SPECIFICATION FOR HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST AND CONTINUE TO ESTABLISH THE POSITION IN THE UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE GROUP (Human Resources Manager Vanessa Godinez) Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council: 1. Approve reclassification of the position of Personnel Analyst to Human Resources Analyst; and 2. Approve the class specification for Human Resources Analyst; and 3. Affirm that the bargaining unit for this classification remains with the Unrepresented Employee Group. Human Resources AnalystAttachments: f.REPORT 21-0168 VISTA SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE (Environmental Analyst Leeanne Singleton) Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Interagency Cost Sharing Agreement (Attachment 1) between the Hermosa Beach City School District (School District) and the City of Hermosa Beach (City) for the City's proportional share of work to be performed by the School District's authorized contractors. 1. Interagency Cost Sharing Agreement - HBCSD and City of Hermosa Beach NTMP Implementation Attachments: g.REPORT 21-0147 ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH ACCESS, INC. TO PROVIDE ON-CALL ADA SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $90,000 (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council: 1. Award a not-to-exceed $90,000 Professional Services Agreement to Access, Inc. to provide on-call ADA services to the City for three years; and 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the Professional Services Agreement, subject to approval by the City Attorney. 1. EXHIBIT A Scope of Work for ADA Consultant 2. PSA 20-012 DRAFT ACCESS INC for ADA Attachments: XII. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION - Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be handled separately. Public comment will be taken prior to Council deliberation and action on each item pulled from the Consent Calendar. XIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M. a.REPORT 21-0158 RECONSIDERATION OF THE DECEMBER 15, 2020 PLANNING Page 8 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE PARKING PLAN 20-4 REQUEST TO ALLOW MEDICAL CLINIC/OFFICE USES AT AN EXISTING MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING (PACIFIC PLAZA OFFICES) LOCATED AT 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BASED ON USE OF UP TO 40 SHARED PARKING SPACES WITH 2420 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (HOPE CHAPEL); AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council: 1. Reconsider the December 15, 2020 Planning Commission decision to approve Parking Plan 20-4 request to allow medical clinic/office uses at an existing multi-tenant commercial building (Pacific Plaza Offices) located at 2200 Pacific Coast Highway based on use of up to 40 shared parking spaces with 2420 Pacific Coast Highway (Hope Chapel); and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); 2. Conduct the Public Hearing; and 3. Adopt draft resolution sustaining the December 15, 2020 Planning Commission decision to approve Parking Plan 20-4. 1. Draft Resolution.docx 2. Supplemental Applicant Response to Appeal of Parking Plan 20-4.pdf 3. Technical Appendix.pdf 4. Link to November 17, 2020 Planning Commission Staff Report 5. Link to December 15, 2020 Planning Commission Staff Report 6. Applicant Submittal- Request Letter, Plans, Parking Study, Shared Parking Easement, Tenant Roster, and Photos.pdf 7. Parking Study Peer Review by Interwest.pdf 8. City Response Letter Re Medical Clinics and Parking.pdf 9. Planning Commission Resolution 81-26 (Current CUP).pdf 10. Public Notice Verfication Posters.pdf 11. 500' Radius Map and Notice.pdf 12. SUPPLEMENTAL Email from Jim Fasola (Submitted 3-2-21 at 3.26 p.m.) Attachments: b.REPORT 21-0144 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER 8.52 OF TITLE 8 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS, FOR COMPLIANCE UNDER THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) (Deputy City Engineer Lucho Rodriguez) (Deputy City Attorney Kathy Shin) Page 9 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council introduce on first reading an Ordinance amending Chapter 8.52 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Floodplain Management Regulations, for compliance under the National Flood Insurance Program 1. Floodplains Ord. 21-XXXX 2. FEMA Flood Hazard Area - Effective 4.21.21 - with zone descriptions and Strand wall Attachments: XIV. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a.REPORT 21-0145 RELEASE THE HOLD PLACED ON CIP 544-GREENBELT ACCESSIBLE PATH ASSESSMENT AND APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ACCESS, INC.’s PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council: 1. Release the hold placed on CIP 544-Greenbelt Accessible Path Assessment; 2. Authorize an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement No. 20.04 with Access, Inc. for an additional $10,000 from CIP 544 to identify and provide an assessment of alternatives for an accessible path within the Greenbelt; and 3. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the amendment to the Professional Services Agreement, subject to approval by the City Attorney. 1. STUDY 544 Greenbelt Accessible Path Assessment 2. PSA 20-004 executed 3. FIRST AMENDMENT - Access, Inc. Attachments: b.REPORT 21-0122 MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2020-21 Continued from February 23, 2021 (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council: 1. Approve the revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, budget transfers, and fund balances as shown herein and in the attached Revenue Detail Report, Additional Appropriations Report, Budget Transfers Report, and Budget Summary Report; 2. Approve the following transactions from the General Fund: a. Transfer $88,294 to the assigned fund balance for Contingencies in order to maintain the City's target of 16% of appropriations for this goal; b. Transfer $1,751,688 of unspent funds from 2019-20 from the unassigned fund balance category to the assigned fund balance category; and c. Transfer 1,823,416 of unspent funds from 2020-21 from the unassigned fund balance category to the assigned fund balance category. 3. Receive and file the attached information about City Council travel. Page 10 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 1. 2020-21 Revenue Detail Report 2. 2020-21 Additional Appropriations Report 3. 2020 -21 Midyear Budget Transfers 4. 2020-21 Midyear Budget Summary 5. 2020-21 City Council Travel Summary 6. SUPPLEMENTAL Ecomment from Dean Francois (Submitted 2-23-21 at 2 p.m.) 7. SUPPLEMENTAL Attachement 2020-21 Midyear Year Review General Fund Summary (Submitted 3-3-21 at 5.47 p.m.) 8. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation 20-21 Midyear Budget Slides (Submitted 3-3-21 at 5.47 p.m.) Attachments: c.REPORT 21-0131 AGREEMENT FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT SERVICES (Chief of Police Paul LeBaron) Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council discuss and provide direction regarding a proposed amendment to the existing agreement with Willdan Engineering ("Willdan") for pandemic related code enforcement services. The proposed amendment would provide an additional $50,000 in funding and establish a new agreement termination date of December 31, 2021. 1. WILLDAN ENGINEERING - AGREEMENT FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT SERVICES 2. Ordinance No. 20-1415U 3. Proposed 1st Amendment to Agreement Attachments: d.REPORT 21-0157 A LETTER REGARDING LAX AIRFIELD AND TERMINAL MODERNIZATION PROJECT AND DRAFT EIR (Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss) Recommendation:Staff recommends City Council approve a letter detailing the City's response to the LAX Airfield and Terminal Modernization Project draft EIR and authorize the Mayor to sign it. XV. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items and questions from Councilmembers regarding the status of future agenda items. No discussion or debate of these requests shall be undertaken; the sole action is whether to schedule the item for consideration on a future agenda. No public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The existing list of future agenda items below is for information only. a.21-0162 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Tentative Future Agenda.pdfAttachments: XVI. ADJOURNMENT Page 11 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda FUTURE MEETINGS AND CITY HOLIDAYS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS: March 9, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting March 18, 2021 - Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Joint Meeting with School Board March 23, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting April 7, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session April 13, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting April 21, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - FY 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program April 27, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting May 5, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session May 11, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting May 25, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting May 27, 2021 - Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Budget Study Session June 2, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session June 8, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting (Budget Adoption) June 22, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting July 7, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session July 13, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting July 22, 2021 - Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Joint Meeting with all Boards/Commissions July 27, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting Page 12 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - CONTINUED: August 10, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting August 24, 2021 - Tuesday - No Meeting (Dark) September 1, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session September 14, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting September 28, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting October 6, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session October 12, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting October 23, 2021 - Saturday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 9:00 AM - City Council Retreat October 26, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting November 3, 2021 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session November 9, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting (Mayor Transition) November 23, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting December 14, 2021 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting December 28, 2020 - Tuesday - No Meeting (Dark) Page 13 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 March 9, 2021City Council Regular Meeting Agenda BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS: March 16, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting March 17, 2021 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting April 5, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting April 12, 2021 - Monday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting April 20, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting May 3, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting May 4, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting May 18, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting May 19, 2021 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting June 1, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting June 7, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting June 15, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting July 6, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting July 12, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting July 21, 2021 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting July 20, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting August 2, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting August 3, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting August 17, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting September 9, 2021 - Thursday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting September 13, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting September 21, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 2021 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting October 4, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting October 5, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting October 19, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting November 1, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting November 2, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting November 16, 2021 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting November 17, 2021 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting December 6, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting December 7, 2021 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting December 13, 2021 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting CITY OFFICES CLOSED FRIDAY-SUNDAY AND ON THE FOLLOWING DAYS: January 18, 2021 - Monday - Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday February 15, 2021 - Monday - President's Day May 31, 2021 - Monday - Memorial Day July 5, 2021 - Monday - Independence Day Observed September 6, 2021 - Monday - Labor Day November 11, 2021 - Thursday - Veteran's Day November 25, 2021 - Thursday - Thanksgiving Day Page 14 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0148 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0149 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 PROCLAMATION DECLARING MARCH 2021 AS AMERICAN RED CROSS MONTH IN HERMOSA BEACH City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0151 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 COVID-19 UPDATE City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0153 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 WEST COAST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT UPDATE City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0152 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 UPDATE FROM CHIEF LEBARON ON COVID-19 EMERGENCY ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ From:tony higgins To:Eduardo Sarmiento Subject:Re: NextDoor Post - CITY RECENT EMPHASIS ON DOG BEACH ENFORCEMENT IS OUT OF STEP WITH SMALL BEACH TOWN VALUES IN SO MANY WAYS! Date:Thursday, March 4, 2021 5:48:13 AM Priorities Simply Wrong START WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: March 4, 2021 To: City Council Fm: Anthony Higgins Subject: RECENT EMPHASIS ON DOG BEACH ENFORCEMENT IS OUT OF STEP WITH SMALL BEACH TOWN VALUES IN SO MANY WAYS! The city manager & city council want to punish the dog owners and let the restaurant owners and people claiming their Covid fatigue disability entitlement subvert the county Covid safety protocols left and right at our beaches and parks in the midst of a raging pandemic. Boy has this city got its priorities twisted. But that’s what happens when you get a gentrified city council and a large enough base of people that don’t know what a small beach town culture really was. Times change I guess and every generation needs to “mark it’s spot” one way or another. Too bad we are going to end up looking like a second rate version of a tourist trap for the rich and famous if we continue down this path. Dogs will make a return to our beaches when enough people realize there is more to small town beach culture than including it in the vision statement of the cities general plan. Dogs will return to the beach when enough people realize that Hermosa can be more than a tourist attraction for the rich and wannabe famous. Dogs will return to the beach when our city realizes there are more important values and priorities than our city managers vision of making downtown Hermosa look like 2nd street in Long Beach where she served on the city council for what 10 years. Dogs will return to the beach when people realize that the restaurants and glitzy special event culture we have embarked on barely provides anyone living in Hermosa with a living-wage; but they suck the quality of life out of many of our neighborhoods. Dogs will return to the beach when this city gets its priorities straight and throws out the city council who would basically raffle off $100,000+ worth of federal Covid grants to local businesses the restaurants some of whom subverted county Covid safety dining protocols - rather than support our schools with their legitimate Covid related expenses. This is no small town beach culture. Schools would come first last and foremost if that were the case but our city council didn’t even consider that. They were too busy spending another $100,000 plus revitalizing downtown with their pet downtown single lane road diet project on Hermosa and Pier Ave. Oh and did I mention the QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS the council & city manager frittered away on that relatively ugly rendition of our city logo at the intersection Hermosa & Pier and the FAKE TAR COBBLESTONE CROSSWALKS? But it looks great from a helicopter! And finally Dogs will return to the beach when residents realize the inherent beauty of the beach and childhood memories of walking on the beach with your family and dog mean a lot more to a small town beach culture that a red carpet Teen Choice award with police snipers on our small town roofs. Don’t give in mobile warning signs. Tell the city council and the city manager you ain’t buying their priorities and you want them to find a way to return dogs to our beaches. Tell your council member that you know it takes only a couple of a thousand votes to win a council seat and if they don’t get their priorities in order your going to vote to give someone else a chance! HB City Manager Suja@hermosabeach.gov HB Mayor Jmassey@hermosabeach.gov HB CityCouncil Citycouncil@hermosabeach.gov City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0156 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the written communication. Attachments: 1.Email from Tony Higgins dated February 18, 2021 2.Email from Tony Higgins dated February 27, 2021 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ From:tony higgins To:Eduardo Sarmiento Subject:Fwd: Screenshot 2021-02-18 at 5.31.44 AM Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:51:51 AM Attachments:Screenshot 2021-02-18 at 5.31.44 AM.png From: tony higgins <tony.higgins123@gmail.com> Date: February 18, 2021 at 5:47:16 AM PST To: Eduardo Sarmiento <esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov> Cc: Dorothy Scheid <dscheid@hermosabeach.gov> Subject: Screenshot 2021-02-18 at 5.31.44 AM Please submit this Nextdoor poll on how effectively Hermosa beach is handling speeding vehicles and pedestrian safety as a written communication to the city council under the title of TRAFFIC SAFETY. In 5 days with 156 respondents the verdict is clear. The question is will the council agendize this and figure out if there are underlying causes that can be fixed. I know in my case it’s not that I’ve been hit a crosswalk; it’s the increasing frequency of near misses. Also, can you please let me know when the next State required Engineering Traffic Study (ETS) will be done. The last one was nearly 5 years ago in August of 2016. Thank You From:tony higgins To:Eduardo Sarmiento Cc:City Council; DG_ParksRecCommission Subject:Written communication to city council and parks commission Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 7:46:10 AM Dear Mr. Sarmiento Please include this as a written communication to the city council AND the Parks Commission under the title of “Valley Park Covid Enforcement” in the agendas for both meetings START WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: Dear Mr Sarmiento For the second week in a row at Valley Park I have observed a steady increase in the number of children doing what kids do, participating in organized sport activities, tugging, tackling, rolling on the ground wrestling with each other and completely ignoring the mask laws, distancing requirements, ignoring no multihousehold group activities bans. I know “bAH HUmbug!” But therewere about 120 children I observed in the park at about 4pm today. Less than 20% were wearing masks. No one was distancing. Their parents were also clustered together not wearing masks for the most part and not distancing. I don’t blame the kids. But in the face of the new more infectious variants this reckless behavior that is being condoned by parents all over valley park represents a hazard to our community. Moreover, it is clearly evident that the picnic area is being used by large multihousehold dining events regularly on Friday evening and on weekends. Distancing and masks are not being used in clear violation of plain old common sense the county ban on multihousehold group activities. There are new Covid variant is starting to take hold in LA County and across the country Infections and deaths are starting to inch up. Dr Fauci says the new more infectious strains will be dominant in LA county by the end of March. Approximately 60 percent of all Covid transmission is caused by presymptomatic individuals who hadn’t yet developed symptoms and asymptomatic people who never developed symptoms, according to the study published in Journal of the American Medical Association a highly respected peer reviewed medical journal. These are exactly the types ignoring the safety protocols at valley park. https://www.healthline.com/health-news/most-covid-19-cases-come-from-people-without- symptoms Children without symptoms carry a higher Covid viral load than adults who are in intensive care units ((ICU’s) with severe symptoms according to an article published at Harvard.edu Quote: “I was surprised by the high levels of virus we found in children of all ages, especially in the first two days of infection,” says Lael Yonker, director and lead author of the study. “I was not expecting the viral load to be so high. You think of a hospital, and of all of the precautions taken to treat severely ill adults, BUT THE VIRAL LOADS OF THESE HOSPITALIZED PATIENT’S ARE SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER THAN A ‘HEALTHY CHILD’ WHO IS WALKING AROUND WITH A HIGH SARS-CoV-2 VIRAL LOAD.” end quote https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/08/looking-at-children-as-the-silent-spreaders-of- sars-cov-2/ Now here is the thing, in the City Managers report to the City Council in the February 9, city council meeting I believe our police Chief implied the enforcement of Covid safety protocols is being effectively handled at our parks and beaches by Covid safety officers. I believe our Chief implied that the Covid safety officers regularly patrol our parks and regularly issue warnings and citations. Well i have to report I’m at valley park at least twice a day and I haven’t seen a yellow vested Covid safety officer at valley park in several months. And when I did see them iin the early Fall they just passed through. I know that’s not evidence. So accordingly I am submitting a public records request for records that will determine the actual frequency of Covid safety officers patrols in valley park and the number of verbal warnings, written warnings and mask-up citations that have actually been issued at Valley Park. I hope I’m wrong and have to apologize but like I said I haven’t seen a Covid safety officer here at valley park in months. I saw them downtown on many occasions though. If I’m right I’m not saying it’s a conspiracy to mislead the public but it’s a factual mistake that needs to be corrected and action to rectify this condition should be undertaken. Thank you. START CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST: February 26, 2021 Ed Sarmiento Hermosa Beach City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach RE: Public Records Act Request Dear Mr Sarmiento I am requesting access digital copies of records in possession or control of the of the City of Hermosa Beach and/or the Hermosa Beach Police Department pursuant to the California Public Records Act, California Government Code § 6250 et seq. (“CPRA”), and Article I, § 3(b) of the California Constitution. The specific records I seek are from October 1, 2020 through February 9, 2021, and include the following records: 1. All Covid Safety Officer patrol records that show the date time and location of all safety officer patrols at valley park. 2. All records that contain information actual verbal and written warnings, and mask violation issued at valley park 3. Copies of all written warnings and mask-up or there related Covid safety citations issued at Valley Park. As used herein, “Record” includes “Public Records” and “Writings” as those terms are defined at Government Code § 6252(e) & (g). I request digital copies of the records described below be emailed to me at tony.higgins123@gmail.com: If you contend that any portion of the records requested is exempt from disclosure by express provisions of law, Government Code § 6253(a) requires segregation and redaction of that material in order that the remainder of the records may be released. If you contend that any express provision of law exists to exempt from disclosure all or a portion of the records I have requested, Government Code § 6253(c) requires that you notify me of the reasons for the determination not later than 10 days from your receipt of this request. Government Code §§ 6253(d) & 6255(b) require that any response to this request that includes a determination that the request is denied, in whole or in part, must be in writing and include the name and title of the person(s) responsible for the City’s response. Government Code § 6253(d) prohibits the use of the 10-day period, or any provisions of the CPRA or any other law, “to delay access for purposes to public records.” In responding to this request, please keep in mind that Article 1, § 3(b)(2) of the California Constitution expressly requires you to broadly construe all provisions that further the public’s right of access, and to apply any limitations on access as narrowly as possible. If I can provide any clarification that will help expedite your attention to my request, please contact me at [provide phone or email address], pursuant to Government Code § 6253.1 at the above listed email address. Thank you for your timely attention to this matter. Sincerely, Anthony Higgins tony.higgins123@gmail.com END WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Matt McCool mccool.matt@gmail.com (310) 486-9696 March 2, 2021 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Councilwoman Stacey Armarto City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 RE: Hermosa Beach Police Department Corruption Scandal Dear Councilwoman Armato: Thank you and the City staff for all the support in my public records request during the course of my lengthy investigation into the Hermosa Beach Police Department. My two original 2018 emails to you while I was an Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commissioner are attached. (Exhibit A.) As you know this investigation was triggered because knowingly and willingly made false statements in an October 18, 2017 Easy Reader News article regarding my 2014 case. It is completely unacceptable that a member of the HBPD Command Staff would make false statements to the press regarding a City official during a City Council election in order to cover up police misconduct. The following Hermosa Beach Police Department personnel were involved in the original obstruction of justice, the cover up or the retaliation: • Former Police Chief • Lieutenant (Former Sergeant) • Lieutenant (Former Detective Sergeant) • Sergeant (Former Detective Sergeant) • Officer (Former Detective) • Officer (Former Detective) • City Prosecutor • Senior Deputy City Prosecutor • Deputy City Prosecutor (Former Law Clerk/Paralegal) As stated previously, City Attorney ’ law firm provided City Prosecution Services from November 2013 to September 2014. However, I did not find any evidence that City Prosecutor or Assistant City Prosecutor were involved in any misconduct. The likely scenario is that Detective Sergeant buried the case from prosecution until the change over to the City Prosecutor’s Office with the City of Redondo Beach. Since my investigation is concluded by naming names, it is time for the City to address this police corruption scandal. Fiat justitia ruat caelum, Matt McCool cc: Hermosa Beach City Council (via email) Hermosa Beach City Manager, Suja Lowenthal (via email) Hermosa Beach City Attorney, Michael Jenkins (via email) Hermosa Beach Police Chief, Paul LeBaron (via email) Hermosa Beach City Clerk, Eduardo Sarmiento (via email) Exhibit A ________________________________________ From: Matthew McCool [mailto:mmccool@hermosabch.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 3:26 PM To: Mayor Pro Tem Stacey Armato <sarmato@hermosabch.org> Cc: City Council <citycouncil@hermosabch.org>; John Jalili <Jjalili@hermosabch.org>; City Clerk <cityclerk@hermosabch.org> Subject: Re: Public Records Request Mayor Pro Tem Armato: Thank you very much for your assistance with my Public Records Request. Unfortunately much of what I requested was considered exempt by the Public Records Act. However I am the victim in this case, and my rights under Marsy's Law entitle me access to the records of investigation. In a October 18, 2017 Easy Reader article, LT. stated there was nothing wrong with the department’s work in the case delivered to the City Prosecutor on September 16, 2014. Additionally for the December 14, 2014 City Council meeting the Chief of Police had detailed knowledge of the case as Patrick Malloy’s was facing a potential CUP revocation hearing. If there is nothing wrong with the department’s work in the case, then there should not be an issue of releasing the case file to me. The case file should include the following: 1. My statement to the investigating detective 2. The perpetrator's statement to the investigating detective 3. A copy of the security video of the attack I believe there to be overwhelming circumstantial evidence of misconduct and corruption, which also includes motive. Therefore I am declaring my intent to file a formal complaint, and request an investigation. Upon filing my formal complaint with the City Attorney, I will submit to you my draft press release for your review. A press release is in order when a current Commissioner and former City Council Candidate files a misconduct and corruption complaint against the Police Department, the City Prosecutor's Office, the Chief of Police and the City of Hermosa Beach. At your convenience, please let me know if the case file will be made available to me or if I should move forward with a formal complaint. Very respectfully, Matt McCool Emergency Preparedness Commissioner City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dr., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 mmccool@hermosabch.org http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=105 ________________________________________ From: Matthew McCool Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 1:55 PM To: Mayor Pro Tem Stacey Armato Cc: City Council; City Clerk Subject: Public Records Request Mayor Pro Tem Armato: I hope all is well. I am following up with you regarding my October 10, 2017 email. I believe the best way to begin resolving the situation is to file a Public Records Request through you. Fortunately from the “Standing Room” incident there have been refinements to the Public Records Request process to help ensure that the community and Police Department are good partners. Along with this Public Records Request, I wish to invoke my rights under Marsy’s Law. Our City Attorney can provide further clarification of my rights. Please be advised this is a stalking case, and as in most stalking cases the victim is unaware of the stalking until it is too late. This incident was a premeditated orchestrated violent attack involving multiple people, which began with a dangerous sucker punch without warning or provocation, while I was seated. As a result of this violent attack I sustained a permanent spinal injury, and still endure chronic cervical spine and thoracic spine pain. Fortunately immediately after the attack, I had the maturity and discipline to follow procedure. Additionally I was assisted by present off-duty law enforcement to secure the security video. While being deposed, even the defense attorney conceded this incident was an attack. A finally point is that our Chief of Police stated before City Council that this would have occurred no matter where at a given point. The crux in resolving this issue hinders on two points: 1) My statement taken by the investigating detective 2) The court transcript of my victim impact statement, before the judge made a sentencing offer Upon reviewing these two items, you will fully understand the situation. Therefore I am respectfully requesting the follow as a Public Records Request: 1. The entire case file for 4SY008400, which should include the following: • My statement taken by the investigating detective • My emergency room medical records • The security video • My attorney’s deposition of my attacker (Submitted to the City Prosecutor) • A supplemental police report with refuting evidence from the initial police report • All correspondence regarding notification of the criminal justice proceedings 2. Any and all correspondence and records from Chief of Police regarding the 10-21-14 Planning Commission meeting, including all Commissioners and Mr. Fred Hahn. 3. Any and all correspondence and records from Chief of Police regarding the 12-16-14 City Council meeting, including all Councilmembers and Mr. . (I should have been invited to speak before City Council) 4. Any and all correspondence and records regarding Sergeant October 2015 civil court appearance including any correspondence from the defense attorneys. 5. Any and all correspondence and records from the defense attorneys with any Hermosa Beach Police Department personnel and City personnel, including the City Prosecutor. Upon review of these documents if you suspect misconduct or corruption, I advise reading page 93 of the deposition I provided to the City Prosecutor. I believe the motive for the mishandling of this case is identified. Please let me know if I can be any assistance in this Public Records Request. I look forward to meeting with you to reconciling the Public Records Request against my civil case records, and discussing the next steps. Very respectfully, Matt McCool Emergency Preparedness Commissioner City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dr., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 mmccool@hermosabch.org http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=105 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0154 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0155 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES (City Clerk Eduardo Sarmiento) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council approve the following minutes: 1.March 03, 2021 Joint City Council and Planning Commission Meeting 2.February 23, 2021 Regular Meeting 3.September 29, 2020 Joint Meeting of the City Council and Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission Due to staffing shortages in the City Clerk’s office, the following minutes will be provided as soon as they become available. 1.May 12, 2020 Regular Meeting 2.May 21, 2020 Special Meeting 3.May 26, 2020 Special Meeting 4.June 9, 2020 Regular Meeting 5.June 23, 2020 Special Meeting 6.October 13, 2020 Regular Council Meeting 7.October 19, 2020 Adjourned Regular Meeting 8.October 27, 2020 Regular Meeting Respectfully Submitted by: Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Joint City Council And Planning Commission Study Session: Housing Element Meeting Minutes Tuesday, March 3, 2021 Regular Session 6:00 P.M. Virtual Meeting via Zoom City Council Planning Commission Justin Massey, Mayor Rob Saemann, Chair Michael Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Marie Rice, Vice Chair Stacey Armato, Councilmember Peter Hoffman, Commissioner Mary Campbell, Councilmember Stephan Izant, Commissioner David Pedersen, Commissioner I. CALL TO ORDER The City Council Regular Meeting of the City of Hermosa Beach met via a virtual meeting held pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom March 17, 2020 on the above date. Meeting was called to order by Mayor Massey at 6:02 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was led by Mayor Massey. III. ROLL CALL Present: Planning Commissioners Hoffman, Izant, Pedersen, Vice Chair Rice, and Chair Saemann Councilmembers Armato, Campbell, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey Absent: None IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS None V. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The following members of the public provided comment: 1. Laura Pena 2. Jonathan Wicks 3. Jon David VI. Opening Remarks Madam City Manager Suja Lowenthal provided opening remarks regarding the zoning code update study session. City manager Lowenthal introduced Community Development Director Ken Robertson. Director Robertson and staff presented a detailed presentation on the zoning code update. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 3-3-21 Joint City Council & Planning Commission Meeting). VII. QUESTIONS/COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS AND COMMISSIONERS Following staff presentation, Planning Commissioners and City Council engaged in a robust discussion regarding Hermosa Beach zoning code update. The conversation focused around the various details surrounding Plan Hermosa and how the inclusion of flexibility in the zoning code can help to meet the needs of present and future Hermosa residents and businesses. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 3-3-21 Joint City Council & Planning Commission Meeting). VIII. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The following members of the public provided comment: 1. David Grethen 2. Jon David 3. Ed Hart 4. Jonathan Wicks 5. Laura Pena (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 3-3-21 Joint City Council & Planning Commission Meeting). IX. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Massey adjourned the joint meeting to the next City Council meeting on Tuesday March 9, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. for closed session and 6:00 p.m. for regular session. He also announced the next Planning Commission meeting will be held on March 16, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. The joint study session concluded at 8:46 p.m. Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Minutes Tuesday, February 23, 2021 Closed Session Canceled Regular Session 6:00 P.M. Virtual Meeting via Zoom City Council Justin Massey, Mayor Michael Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Stacy Armato, Councilmember Mary Campbell, Councilmember I. CALL TO ORDER The City Council Regular Meeting of the City of Hermosa Beach met via a virtual meeting held pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom March 17, 2020 on the above date. Meeting was called to order by Mayor Massey at 6:01 p.m. Mayor Massey took a moment to mention the grave milestone of 500,000 deaths in the United States due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. He asked all participants of the meeting to acknowledge this somber moment by participating in a moment of silence. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was led Mayor Massey. III. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers Armato, Campbell, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey Absent: None IV. CLOSED SESSION REPORT Closed session was canceled. V. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Massey reminded the community that Behavioral Health Services and the Beach Cities Prevention Community Council are hosting a free virtual marijuana prevention educational event for parents and beach cities community members Thursday, February 25th from 6:00 p.m.–7:30 p.m. He encouraged the community to visit the events calendar on the City’s website for more information and to register. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 2-23-21 Regular City Council Meeting). VI. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Campbell motioned to continue agenda item 14a to Tuesday March 9, 2021, and approve the balance of the consent calendar, seconded by Councilmember Armato. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Campbell, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey NOES: None VII. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS a. COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT b. LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS – AIRFIELD AND TERMINAL MODERNIZATION PROJECT PRESENTATION c. INTRODUCTION OF NEW HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESIDENT/CEO (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 2-23-21 Regular City Council Meeting) VIII. CITY MANAGER REPORTS City Manager Lowenthal began by providing an update on COVID-19. She shared the number of new infections, hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19 are on the decline in Los Angeles County. She added that the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health has identified at least 12 cases of the more infectious U.K. variant of the virus in County residents. She closed her COVID-19 update by sharing how the U.K. variant and other more infectious variants are circulating in the state and County and the importance of continuing to follow County health directives. City Manager Lowenthal then provided an update on outdoor dining expansion. She shared that Hermosa Beach restaurants continue to expand their outdoor dining decks into the spaces created by the City’s Lane Reconfiguration Project. Most recently, Radici, Zanes and Paisanos restaurants have expanded their dining decks. Three additional restaurants are in the process of expanding their outdoor dining. Ms. Lowenthal moved on to provide a quick reminder that small businesses in Hermosa Beach that have been impacted by the COVID -19 pandemic can apply for grants of $10,000 each to meet payroll and other operational expenses. The applications process begins on March 1 and ends March 5. The Los Angeles County Development Authority is overseeing the Small Business Grant Assistance Program. It will hold a lottery to determine which applicants receive a grant, and selected businesses will be asked to complete a comprehensive application form. This program is for Hermosa Beach businesses only. City Manager Lowenthal pivoted to share information about the upcom ing May 11, 2021 special election to fill a City Council vacancy. She shared that the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk will begin mailing ballots on April 12. The May 11 election will be conducted through the mail, which will help to ensu re safety during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Official sample ballot booklets will be mailed to registered voters on April 20. Voters may also drop off a ballot at the Vote -By-Mail drop box located behind the Hermosa Beach library across from City Hall o r at the County Registrar’s office. These ballots must be dropped off before 8 p.m. on May 11 to be counted. Any mailed ballot must arrive no later than May 14 to be counted. This date includes a three - day grace period for mail delivery. City Manager Lowenthal closed her report by sharing an update on the beach mat path. She elaborated that Hermosa Beach has installed a pilot beach path that is made of interlocking plastic tiles near 11th Street at the beginning of the summer in 2020. She added that consideration was given to the mats being used at other South Bay beaches. But through feedback from the community, it was determined that the beach tiles being utilized are a better fit for Hermosa’s needs. As continued community feedback was received, adjustments like relocating, widening, and extending the path south of the Pier were implemented. The current location of the path was selected because it is considered a high usage area. Staff continues to monitor the performance of the tiles while also meeting the requirements for Americans with Disability Act. Once the winter sand berm is removed, staff plans on extending the path further towards the water while still allowing safety and operational vehicles a path of travel. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 2-23-21 Regular City Council Meeting) IX. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS/ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS The following members of the public provided public comment: 1. Bob Atkins 2. Geoff Hirsch 3. Daniel Rittenhouse 4. Jon David (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 2-23-21 Regular City Council Meeting) a. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved receive and file written communications, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Detoy. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Campbell, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey NOES: None X. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS a. UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES Mayor Massey shared his support for the tiled mats on 11th street leading to the beach, and how it increases accessibility. He also commented on the possibility of implementing the same tiled mats to provide access from the Greenbelt for wheelchair bound individuals. Councilmember Armato provided an update from the Executive Board Contract Cities meeting she attended. She mentioned recently authored Bill SB809 which will serve as a funding mechanism for affordable housing. Councilmember Campbell reminded the community that the next Economic Development Committee meeting is March 1, 2021. She shared the meeting will include an economic market study presentation. Mayor Pro Detoy provided an update from the County Sanitation District meeting. He shared that discussion at the meeting included the new clear water tunnel which runs from the treatment plant and out to the ocean in San Pedro. Ground-breaking for this project will occur in 2021. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 2-23-21 Regular City Council Meeting) XI. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved to approve the consent calendar, seconded by Councilmember Campbell. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Campbell, Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, and Mayor Massey NOES: None a. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES b. CHECK REGISTERS c. REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, COVID-19 REVENUE TRACKING REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR DECEMBER 2020 d. CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT e. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF February 11, 2021 f. PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS g. SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD QUARTERLY SUMMARY h. APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH MIG INC. TO PREPARE CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS FOR THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN THE CALTRANS ADAPTATION PLANNING GRANT PROJECT i. CITY MANAGER CONTRACT AMENDMENT j. APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH LITTLE LEAGUE (HBLL) TO ELIMINATE THE CREDIT OPPORTUNITY THAT WOULD OFFSET HBLL’S FIELD USE FEES; AND ELIMINATION OF THE VENDOR REQUIREMENT REGARDING PREVAILING WAGES k. APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION (HBEF) FOR ITS ANNUAL HEARTS OF HERMOSA EVENT TO EXTEND IT BY ONE YEAR, EXPIRING IN MARCH 2023; UPDATES TO EVENT DATES FOR 2022 AND 2023; AND ALLOWANCE OF A SUBSTITUTE FUNDRAISING EVENT IN 2021 WITH ADDITIONAL FEE WAIVER CONSIDERATIONS AS A RESULT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC l. RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT CLAIMS XII. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION None XIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS – TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M. None XIV. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2020–21 Item continued to the March 9, 2021 City Council meeting. b. A LETTER REGARDING LAX AIRFIELD AND TERMINAL MODERNIZATION PROJECT AND DRAFT EIR MOTION: Mayor Massey moved to approve the item with the following direction. Staff will draft a letter with a budget for consultant not to exceed $1,000. Staff will reach out to consultant who assisted El Segundo in drafting their LAX Airfield letter. Staff will bring back drafted letter for review by City Council at the March 9, 2021 City Council meeting. Motion seconded by Councilmember Armato. Motion carried by majority consent. AYES: Councilmembers Campbell, Armato, and Mayor Massey NOES: Mayor Pro Tem Detoy (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 2-23-21 Regular City Council Meeting) XV. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS a. TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT Mayor Massey adjourned the City Council meeting to March 3, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. for a joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting. The Council meeting concluded at 9:13 p.m. Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Hermosa Beach Joint City Council And Planning Commission Study Session: Housing Element Meeting Minutes Tuesday, September 29, 2020 Regular Session 6:00 P.M. Virtual Meeting via Zoom City Council Parks and Recreation Commission Mary Campbell, Mayor Lauren Pizer-Mains, Chair Justin Massey, Mayor Pro Tem Barbara Ellman, Vice Chair Stacey Armato, Councilmember Jessica Guheen, Commissioner Michael Detoy, Councilmember Traci Horowitz, Commissioner Hany Fangary, Councilmember Jani Lange, Commissioner I. CALL TO ORDER The City Council Regular Meeting of the City of Hermosa Beach met via a virtual meeting held pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom March 17, 2020 on the above date. Meeting was called to order by Mayor Campbell at 6:03 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was led by Mayor Campbell III. ROLL CALL Present: Parks and Recreation Commissioners Guheen, Horowitz, Lange, Vice Chair Ellman, and Chair Pizer-Mains. Councilmembers Armato, Detoy, Fangary, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell Absent: None IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS None V. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The following members of the public provided public comment: 1. Mike Hume VI. Opening Remarks Madam City Manager Suja Lowenthal provided opening remarks regarding the study session to review the final report on the community theatre needs assessment study. City manager Lowenthal introduced Community Resources Director Kelly Orta. Director Orta and the theatre assessment team presented a detailed presentation on the community theatre needs assessment. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 9-29-20 Joint Meeting of the City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission). VII. QUESTIONS/COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS AND COMMISSIONERS Following staff presentation, Parks and Recreation Commissioners and City Council engaged in a robust discussion regarding the community theatre needs assessment. The conversation focused around the various improvement needs, maintaining the historical essence of the building, and following building code and historical directives. Cost factors and funding for the improvements was also discussed. Additional ideas were discussed regarding uses and various types of events the building could accommodate that would maximize its utilization. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 9-29-20 Joint Meeting of the City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission). VIII. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The following members of the public provided comment: 1. Janice Brittain 2. Cort Casady 3. Mike Hume 4. David Grethen 5. Ashley Chase (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link. 9-29-20 Joint Meeting of the City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission). IX. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Campbell adjourned the study session and announced that the next Park and Recreation Commission meeting will be held on Tuesday October 6, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. She then announced the City Council will adjourn to a special closed session meeting, followed by adjournment to the City Council retreat to be held on Saturday October 10, 2020 at 8:00 a.m. The joint study session concluded at 9:18 p.m. Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0150 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council ratify the following check registers. Attachments: 1.Check Register 2/11/2021 2.Check Register 2/18/2021 Respectfully Submitted by: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 02/11/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 2:52:39PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96739 2/11/2021 ACCELA INC INV-ACC53375 ACCELA AUTOMATION IMPLEMENTATION05817 715-4201-4201 1,813.33 Total : 1,813.3305817 96740 2/11/2021 ALKADIS, CHRISTOPHER TR 847 PER DIEM/ SUPERVISORY LEADERSHIP11359 001-2101-4312 150.00 Total : 150.0011359 96741 2/11/2021 AT&T 960 461-1985 555 7 PD COMPUTER CIRCUITS/FEB 2100321 001-2101-4304 109.65 Total : 109.6500321 96742 2/11/2021 AT&T MOBILITY 287298411168 PD CELL PHONES - DEC 202013361 001-2101-4304 475.56 001-3302-4304 170.20 001-2101-4304 506.04 001-3302-4304 168.68 001-2101-4304 -635.28 001-3302-4304 -211.76 Total :473.4413361 96743 2/11/2021 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 21-042 OPEB & CALPERS VALUATION REPORTS/DEC 20212387 001-1202-4201 10,570.00 001-1202-4201 885.00 Total : 11,455.0012387 96744 2/11/2021 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE Stmt Date 2/2/21 PRISONER LAUNDRY/ JAN 2100163 001-2101-4306 203.34 Total : 203.3400163 96745 2/11/2021 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 4286211111 WATER USAGE - DEC 202000016 105-2601-4303 5,640.97 001-6101-4303 17,305.65 001-4204-4303 1,294.48 001-3304-4303 109.42 Total : 24,350.5200016 96746 2/11/2021 CAPITAL WHOLESALE LIGHTING 435303 ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/ JAN 2121720 105-2601-4309 374.45 2b (1) 02/11/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 2:52:39PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96746 2/11/2021 (Continued)CAPITAL WHOLESALE LIGHTING21720 ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/ JAN 21435391 105-2601-4309 485.10 ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/ JAN 21435987 001-4204-4309 576.06 Total : 1,435.6121720 96747 2/11/2021 CONTINENTAL MAPPING SERVICE 12221 BULK MAILING SERVICE FOR NOTICES REGARDI20398 001-1201-4201 2,166.75 Total : 2,166.7520398 96748 2/11/2021 CRYSTAL LIGHTING CORP 15822 STREET LIGHT FIXTURE18401 105-2601-4201 450.00 105-2601-4201 82.06 Total : 532.0618401 96749 2/11/2021 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SL210375 HWY SIGNALS & LIGHTING MAINT/OCT-DEC 20200267 105-2601-4251 1,306.89 Total : 1,306.8900267 96750 2/11/2021 DEWEY PEST CONTROL 1233239 SEWER RAT ABATEMENT/ JAN 2111449 160-3102-4201 272.00 SEWER RAT ABATEMENT/ FEB 211233239 160-3102-4201 272.00 PEST CONTROL/JAN 21759408 001-4204-4201 749.00 PEST CONTROL/FEB 21759408 001-4204-4201 849.00 TRAPS FOR SOUTH PARK759408 001-6101-4309 250.00 Total : 2,392.0011449 96751 2/11/2021 DLT SOLUTIONS, LLC SI489062 FY 2020-21 BUDGETED AUTO CAD ANNUAL SUBS12678 715-4202-4201 411.60 Total : 411.6012678 96752 2/11/2021 EASY READER 5016 MAT REQ 708579/LEGAL ADS/JAN 2100181 001-1121-4323 779.63 Total : 779.6300181 02/11/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 2:52:39PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96753 2/11/2021 EVERBRIDGE, INC.M59298 EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION SYS/MAR 21 - FEB19114 001-1201-4201 10,221.00 Total : 10,221.0019114 96754 2/11/2021 FAMILY THEATRE INC 2002606 & 2002607 CLASS REFUNDS16932 001-2111 600.00 Total : 600.0016932 96755 2/11/2021 FEDEX OFFICE 101600012313 PRINTING SERVICES/JAN 2106293 001-4201-4305 185.96 PRINTING SERVICES/OCT 20201016095872970844 001-1101-4305 2.66 PRINTING SERVICES/DEC 20201016184577363885 001-1101-4305 1.34 PRINTING SERVICES/ DEC 20201016332167745416 001-1101-4305 1.34 Total : 191.3006293 96756 2/11/2021 FRONTIER 310-379-0652-1216195 EOC LANDLINES/ JAN 2119884 001-1201-4304 65.44 Total : 65.4419884 96757 2/11/2021 GRAHAM, KATIE 2002603.003 CLASS REFUND14421 001-2111 86.80 Total : 86.8014421 96758 2/11/2021 HONDA MD INC, STEPHAN T 00115932 DETAINEE BLOOD DRAWS/NOV 202015141 001-2101-4201 63.60 DETAINEE BLOOD DRAWS/ DEC 202000117423 001-2101-4201 190.80 Total : 254.4015141 96759 2/11/2021 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS SI00417052 MAT REQ 791305/OFFICE SUPPLIES/ JAN 2116742 001-2101-4305 23.00 Total : 23.0016742 96760 2/11/2021 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INV62471 DRINKING FOUNTAIN PARTS11454 001-6101-4309 407.00 001-6101-4309 37.24 02/11/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 2:52:39PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 444.24 96760 2/11/2021 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS11454 96761 2/11/2021 MUELLER, JAMES 2002608 & 2002609 CLASS REFUND17718 001-2111 272.00 Total : 272.0017718 96762 2/11/2021 MUENCHOW, LAURA 2002605.003 CLASS REFUND11443 001-2111 120.00 Total : 120.0011443 96763 2/11/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 148596815001 MAT REQ 874062/OFFICE SUPPLIES/JAN 2113114 001-1202-4305 148.62 001-1208-4305 2.26 MAT REQ 708576/OFFICE SUPPLIES/ JAN 21149903451001 001-1121-4305 60.68 Total : 211.5613114 96764 2/11/2021 PARKS COFFEE CALIFORNIA, INC.70050534 COFFEE SERVICE/ JAN 2122071 001-2101-4305 125.08 001-2101-4306 125.07 Total : 250.1522071 96765 2/11/2021 SBCU VISA 0693855 CC CENTRAL STORES SUPPLIES, ORDER #03353 001-1208-4305 39.53 CENTRAL STORES SUPPLIES, ORDER #5317025 CC 001-1208-4305 27.38 Total : 66.9103353 96766 2/11/2021 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 9491-1 MAT REQ 987188/PAINTING SUPP/JAN 2117903 001-3104-4309 382.21 Total : 382.2117903 96767 2/11/2021 SHOEMAKER, PHYLLIS 2002604.003 CLASS REFUND22162 001-2111 60.00 Total : 60.0022162 96768 2/11/2021 SHOREN, VIRGINIA 2821 2020 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE17645 001-6871 126.60 105-3105 24.61 02/11/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 2:52:39PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 151.21 96768 2/11/2021 SHOREN, VIRGINIA17645 96769 2/11/2021 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 5620018879 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ OCT 202007158 001-3104-4201 417.50 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ NOV 20205620032156 001-3104-4201 465.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ DEC 20205620033309 001-3104-4201 699.06 Total : 1,581.5607158 96770 2/11/2021 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, LLC 105699515-001 MAT REQ 987237/LANDSCAPING SUPP/ JAN 2119829 001-6101-4309 624.26 Total : 624.2619829 96771 2/11/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 2-00-989-7315 ELECTRICITY/JAN 2100159 001-3104-4303 5,096.28 ELECTRICITY/DEC 2020 & JAN 20212-01-414-1071 105-2601-4303 252.46 001-4204-4303 7,786.59 ELECTRICITY/ JAN 212-01-414-2152 001-6101-4303 1,192.94 ELECTRICITY/JAN 212-01-414-3994 160-3102-4201 56.59 ELECTRICITY/ DEC 2020 & JAN 20212-01-414-4281 105-2601-4303 11,865.35 ELECTRICITY/JAN 212-20-128-4825 001-3304-4303 1,652.56 ELECTRICITY/JAN 212-20-984-6369 105-2601-4303 60.58 Total : 27,963.3500159 96772 2/11/2021 SPRINT 551834312-229 CELL PHONE USAGE - CR/ DEC 202010098 001-4601-4304 164.18 Total : 164.1810098 96773 2/11/2021 THOMASZDEH, LESLIE 2002611.003 CLASS REFUND22219 001-2111 82.40 Total : 82.4022219 96774 2/11/2021 T-MOBILE 946625962 PD CELL PHONES/JAN 2119082 02/11/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 2:52:39PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96774 2/11/2021 (Continued)T-MOBILE19082 001-2101-4304 26.62 Total : 26.6219082 96775 2/11/2021 ULINE 129137584 DISPOSABLE FACE MASK FOR HEALTH ORDER EN14007 157-2702-4305 333.87 157-2702-4305 30.39 Total : 364.2614007 96776 2/11/2021 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, PARS #6746019200PO 35414 PARS/OPEB CONTRIBUTIONS/ JAN 2114528 001-1101-4190 141.00 001-1121-4190 607.00 001-1201-4190 2,349.00 001-1202-4190 1,908.00 001-1203-4190 721.00 001-1204-4190 1,062.00 001-2101-4190 14,819.00 001-3104-4190 995.00 001-3301-4190 100.00 001-3302-4190 3,197.00 001-4101-4190 1,378.00 001-4201-4190 1,414.00 001-4202-4190 2,267.00 001-4204-4190 734.00 001-4601-4190 1,095.00 001-6101-4190 944.00 105-2601-4190 199.00 160-3102-4190 257.00 161-3109-4190 179.00 715-4206-4190 536.00 Total : 34,902.0014528 96777 2/11/2021 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 71713889 VOIP PHONES - CR/DEC 202018666 001-4601-4304 143.07 Total : 143.0718666 96778 2/11/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS 9871023113 CELL PHONE USAGE - CD/ DEC 202003209 001-4201-4304 192.16 TRUNK MODEMS - PD/DEC 20209871384796 02/11/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 2:52:39PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96778 2/11/2021 (Continued)VERIZON WIRELESS03209 153-2106-4201 418.11 Total : 610.2703209 96779 2/11/2021 WESTERN GRAPHIX 53983 EMPLOYEE ID CARDS/SEP, NOV, & DEC 202002873 001-2101-4201 83.63 EMPLOYEE ID CARDS/ DEC 2020 - FEB 202154112 001-1203-4305 51.59 Total : 135.2202873 Bank total : 127,577.23 41 Vouchers for bank code :boa 127,577.23Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 41 "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 7 inclusive, of the check register for 2/11/2021 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 2/11/2021 02/18/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 5:27:18PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96780 2/18/2021 AT&T MOBILITY 287016141723X0114202 PW ADMIN/FANGARY/CELL PHONES/DEC2013361 001-4202-4304 346.12 001-1101-4304 74.29 Total : 420.4113361 96781 2/18/2021 ATHENS SERVICES 9745839 PD SHREDDING/2 BINS/JAN2116660 001-2101-4309 45.00 PD SHREDDING/2 BINS/FEB219890993 001-2101-4309 49.50 001-2026 4.50 001-2027 -4.50 Total : 94.5016660 96782 2/18/2021 BARROWS, PATRICK 35891 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT17271 001-4601-4221 849.80 Total : 849.8017271 96783 2/18/2021 BEEDY, JIM Trip Log 5697548-A REIMB/TIRE DISPOSAL AT ATLANTIS TIRE21282 715-4206-4201 250.00 Total : 250.0021282 96784 2/18/2021 CALBO 13863 CALBO F. VALLES01037 001-4201-4317 70.00 Total : 70.0001037 96785 2/18/2021 CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC 4035340875 COPIER MAINT-USAGE/1-10 TO 4-9-2110838 715-1208-4201 818.66 715-2101-4201 52.09 715-1201-4201 391.12 Total : 1,261.8710838 96786 2/18/2021 CDWG 7520211 PRINTER TONER/INK - FEB 2109632 001-2101-4305 845.13 Total : 845.1309632 96787 2/18/2021 CITY NATIONAL BANK Agreement 05-011 BAY VIEW ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOND PMT13304 609-2252 5,662.16 Total : 5,662.1613304 2b (2) 02/18/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 5:27:18PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96788 2/18/2021 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES C0009681 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES/ MARCH 2120781 001-2202-4251 458,519.00 180-2202-4251 3,589.00 001-2202-5601 30,306.00 001-2202-4111 10,630.00 Total : 503,044.0020781 96789 2/18/2021 EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING AND EQUIP 12070 CLEAN & VIDEO INSPECT SEWERS/ JAN 2107853 160-3102-4201 42,356.57 Total : 42,356.5707853 96790 2/18/2021 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 7-225-69688 EXPRESS MAIL - NV5/ DEC 2001962 001-4202-4201 63.59 EXPRESS MAIL - NV5/ JAN 217-260-22915 001-4202-4201 27.71 EXPRESS MAIL - NV5/ JAN 217-267-66438 001-4202-4201 27.71 Total : 119.0101962 96791 2/18/2021 FINISHMASTER INC 87279678 AUTO PAINT & POLISHES13353 001-3104-4309 168.84 Total : 168.8413353 96792 2/18/2021 FRONTIER 310-318-8751-0128095 CASHIER TAPS LINE/FEB2119884 001-1204-4304 57.63 EOC CABLE & INTERNET/ FEB 21323-159-2268-0924145 001-1201-4304 291.20 Total : 348.8319884 96793 2/18/2021 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS SI00418000 MAT REQ 437823/OFFICE SUPPLIES/ FEB 2116742 001-3302-4305 48.96 Total : 48.9616742 96794 2/18/2021 IPS GROUP INC INV55825 PARKING METER WIRELESS/CC FEES/DEC2019314 001-3302-4201 7,931.07 Total : 7,931.0719314 96795 2/18/2021 JLEE ENGINEERING, INC.4146 PLANNING/ZONING PLAN CHECKS/NOV2021644 001-4101-4201 2,400.00 02/18/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 5:27:18PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 2,400.00 96795 2/18/2021 JLEE ENGINEERING, INC.21644 96796 2/18/2021 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 640696 MEMBERSHIP DUES/JAN21-DEC2100842 001-1101-4315 7,105.00 Total : 7,105.0000842 96797 2/18/2021 M6 CONSULTING INC 1525-20 LAND USE PLAN CHECKS/DEC2019487 001-4201-4201 5,767.50 Total : 5,767.5019487 96798 2/18/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 152705696001 MAT REQ 791306/OFFICE SUPPLIES/ JAN 2113114 001-2101-4305 76.64 MAT REQ 437821/OFFICE SUPPLIES/ JAN 21153682665001 001-3302-4305 60.21 MAT REQ 863091/OFFICE SUPPLIES/ JAN 21153840653001 001-4201-4305 55.40 Total : 192.2513114 96799 2/18/2021 PARS 47013 ALT RETIREMENT PLAN ADMIN FEES/OCT2014693 001-1101-4185 6.04 001-1204-4185 0.56 001-3302-4185 2.80 001-4204-4185 5.23 001-4101-4185 5.85 001-4201-4185 5.85 001-4601-4185 93.68 ALT RETIREMENT PLAN ADMIN FEES/NOV2047235 001-1101-4185 6.08 001-1204-4185 0.57 001-3302-4185 2.82 001-4204-4185 5.27 001-4101-4185 5.88 001-4201-4185 5.88 001-4601-4185 94.33 Total : 240.8414693 96800 2/18/2021 POMERANITZ, EFRAT G.35897 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT19853 001-4601-4221 630.00 Total : 630.0019853 02/18/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 5:27:18PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96801 2/18/2021 RACE COMMUNICATIONS Stmt#RC457657 DEDICATED INTERNET SERVICE/FEB2122179 715-1206-4201 1,022.00 Total : 1,022.0022179 96802 2/18/2021 RED SECURITY GROUP, LLC 69456 KEYS MADE/FEB 2113255 001-2101-4305 54.20 Total : 54.2013255 96803 2/18/2021 RJ PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL 618 5,000 NO PARKING/TOW AWAY SIGNS21153 001-4202-4305 904.85 001-4202-4305 75.51 Total : 980.3621153 96804 2/18/2021 SBCU VISA 001-11664954 CC CIRCUE DU SOLIEL EXCURSION REFUND03353 001-4601-4201 -577.00 ICC MEMBER/TRAINING010721 001-4201-4317 165.00 RAPID COVID TESTING FOR PD STAFF011921 157-2702-4201 125.00 HAND SANITIZER 8.11 OZ03f-837 157-2702-4305 99.80 OFFICE SHELVES0446620 001-4601-4305 130.98 001-4601-4305 12.44 SENIOR CENTER MOVIES/MUSIC - OCT 2020101120 001-4601-4328 9.99 ENR RENEWAL1109145167 001-4101-4315 108.00 BBQ DINNER FOR PD STAFF AT TEAM BUILDING1202021 001-2101-4305 266.36 POLICE UNIFORM AND EQUIPMENT FOR NEW REC142902 001-2101-4314 527.55 POLICE UNIFORM AND EQUIPMENT FOR NEW REC142934 001-2101-4314 607.41 DEPARTMENT HOLIDAY STAFF MEETING - GIFT3549002 001-4601-4317 20.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION REFUND41932247225 CC 001-2024 -500.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION REFUND41932772817 CC 02/18/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 5:27:18PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96804 2/18/2021 (Continued)SBCU VISA03353 001-2024 -150.00 VETERANS MEMORIAL - VETERANS DAY ACTIVI455-so231635 001-2120 91.42 MASKS FOR INSPECTORS4b0-07f 157-2702-4305 299.90 NEW YEARS EVE MEAL FOR PD STAFF729136 001-2101-4305 348.65 VETERANS MEMORIAL - LETTER BOX FOR VETER8193042 001-2120 64.68 001-2120 6.14 PICKLEBALL BALLS8968263 001-4601-4308 37.98 001-4601-4308 3.60 VETERANS MEMORIAL - VETERANS DAY ACTIVIT916-so232689 001-2120 40.71 PICKLEBALL PADDLES9554 001-4601-4308 399.90 SENIOR CENTER MOVIES/MUSIC - AUG 2020ML0774XYW2 001-4601-4328 9.99 SENIOR CENTER MOVIES/MUSIC - SEP 2020ML07GJNYYH 001-4601-4201 9.99 SENIOR CENTER MOVIES/MUSIC - NOV 2020ML07Y7685N 001-4601-4328 9.99 SENIOR CENTER MOVIES/MUSIC - DEC 2020ML0853S8Q1 001-4601-4328 9.99 SENIOR CENTER MOVIES/MUSIC - JAN 21ML08DQXH4G 001-4601-4328 9.99 Total : 2,188.4603353 96805 2/18/2021 SPARKLETTS 4472788 012821 DRINKING WATER/JAN2100146 001-4601-4305 81.81 Total : 81.8100146 96806 2/18/2021 SPCALA 2021-0131 ANIMAL SHELTERING SERVICES/ JAN 2118821 001-3302-4201 875.00 Total : 875.0018821 96807 2/18/2021 SPECTRUM BUSINESS 8448300300402150 1301 HERMOSA/540 PIER CONNECT/JAN2120236 02/18/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 5:27:18PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96807 2/18/2021 (Continued)SPECTRUM BUSINESS20236 001-2101-4304 798.92 Total : 798.9220236 96808 2/18/2021 SPECTRUM BUSINESS 8448300300352413 1301 HERMOSA/540 PIER CONNECT/FEB2120236 001-2101-4304 286.98 Total : 286.9820236 96809 2/18/2021 SPECTRUM BUSINESS 8448300300350359 1301 HERMOSA/RCC CONNECT/FEB2120236 001-2101-4304 152.22 Total : 152.2220236 96810 2/18/2021 SPECTRUM BUSINESS 8448300300046247 CITY HALL/CABLE/FEB2120236 715-4204-4201 108.73 Total : 108.7320236 96811 2/18/2021 TURBODATA SYSTEMS, INC.34010 TICKET WRITER WIRELESS FESS/JAN21-APR2120670 001-3302-4201 3,750.00 Total : 3,750.0020670 96812 2/18/2021 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, PARS #674601920021621 PARS/OPEB CONTRIBUTIONS/FEB 2114528 001-1101-4190 141.00 001-1121-4190 607.00 001-1201-4190 2,349.00 001-1202-4190 1,908.00 001-1203-4190 721.00 001-1204-4190 1,062.00 001-2101-4190 14,819.00 001-3104-4190 995.00 001-3301-4190 100.00 001-3302-4190 3,197.00 001-4101-4190 1,378.00 001-4201-4190 1,414.00 001-4202-4190 2,267.00 001-4204-4190 734.00 001-4601-4190 1,095.00 001-6101-4190 944.00 105-2601-4190 199.00 160-3102-4190 257.00 02/18/2021 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 5:27:18PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 96812 2/18/2021 (Continued)UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, PARS #674601920014528 161-3109-4190 179.00 715-4206-4190 536.00 Total : 34,902.0014528 96813 2/18/2021 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE 32009 MONTHLY PRINTER MAINTENANCE/ MAR 2104768 715-1206-4201 554.45 Total : 554.4504768 5272379 2/18/2021 DEPT OF HEALTH CARE SRVS/GEMT GEM03218GR9 MED TRANSPORT QUALITY ASSURE FEE/JUL-SEP21347 001-1201-4251 5,878.60 Total : 5,878.6021347 Bank total : 631,440.47 35 Vouchers for bank code :boa 631,440.47Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 35 "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 7 inclusive, of the check register for 2/18/2021 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 2/22/2021 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0141 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE SERVICES AND AMBULANCE MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY 2021 (Emergency Management Coordinator Brandy Villanueva) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the January 2021 Fire and Ambulance monthly report. Executive Summary: City departments generate monthly reports to provide a snapshot of activities performed each month. Prior to the transition of fire and ambulance transport services to the County of Los Angeles,the Hermosa Beach Fire Department developed monthly response reports.After the transition,the monthly report was updated to include Los Angeles County Fire Department and McCormick Ambulance information and continues to be uploaded to the website.The following report provides details regarding services provided for the month of January 2021. Background: At the February 11,2020 Council meeting,City Council requested monthly reports be placed onto the City Council agenda under consent calendar.On the July 14,2020 Council agenda,the monthly reports for February through May 2020 were provided and accompanied by a detailed staff report explaining the change. This report reflects the services for January 2021. Discussion: The January 2021 monthly report provides an overview of services provided by LACoFD and McCormick Ambulance (Attachment 1:January 2021 LACoFD and McCormick Ambulance Monthly Report). General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0141 Safety Element Goal 5. High quality police and fire protection services provided to residents and visitors. Policies: 5.2 High level of response.Achieve optimal utilization of allocated public safety resources and provide desired levels of response, staffing, and protection within the community. Fiscal Impact: Fire and ambulance services are contracted and accounted for during the annual budget process. Attachments: 1.Fire and ambulance monthly report-January 2021 Respectfully Submitted by: Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Services Coordinator Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ DAY OF THE WEEK E100 S100 Total Sunday 23              15              38                Monday 18              5 23                Tuesday 16              6 22                Wednesday 22              11              33                Thursday 17              11              28                Friday 18              8 26                Saturday 31              25              56                Grand Total 145           81               226            Note: Data based on updated fireview ‐ apparatus 2021 GIS data.  Hermosa Beach units res LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT HERMOSA BEACH FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2021 UNIT RESPONSES  ‐  5  10  15  20  25  30  35 E100 S100 Submitted by: Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 1 TIME OF THE DAY E100 S100 Total 00:00:00 TO 00:59:59 4                 3                7                 01:00:00 TO 01:59:59 7                 3                 10              02:00:00 TO 02:59:59 3                 1                4                 03:00:00 TO 03:59:59 1                 1                 04:00:00 TO 04:59:59 4                 2                6                 05:00:00 TO 05:59:59 4                 1                5                 06:00:00 TO 06:59:59 4                 3                7                 07:00:00 TO 07:59:59 6                 5                 11              08:00:00 TO 08:59:59 2                 1                3                 09:00:00 TO 09:59:59 8                 4                 12              10:00:00 TO 10:59:59 10              3                 13              11:00:00 TO 11:59:59 6                 3                9                 12:00:00 TO 12:59:59 8                 6                 14              13:00:00 TO 13:59:59 6                 2                8                 14:00:00 TO 14:59:59 4                 2                6                 15:00:00 TO 15:59:59 8                 4                 12              16:00:00 TO 16:59:59 13              11             24              17:00:00 TO 17:59:59 6                 4                 10              18:00:00 TO 18:59:59 14              9                 23              19:00:00 TO 19:59:59 7                 5                 12              20:00:00 TO 20:59:59 3                 2                5                 21:00:00 TO 21:59:59 7                 2                9                 22:00:00 TO 22:59:59 8                 3                 11              23:00:00 TO 23:59:59 2                 2                4                 Grand Total 145            81             226            Note: Data based on updated fireview ‐ apparatus 2021 GIS data.  Hermosa Beach units responses. LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT HERMOSA BEACH FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2021 UNIT RESPONSES  ‐  2  4  6  8  10  12  14  16 00:00:00 TO 00:59:5901:00:00 TO 01:59:5902:00:00 TO 02:59:5903:00:00 TO 03:59:5904:00:00 TO 04:59:5905:00:00 TO 05:59:5906:00:00 TO 06:59:5907:00:00 TO 07:59:5908:00:00 TO 08:59:5909:00:00 TO 09:59:5910:00:00 TO 10:59:5911:00:00 TO 11:59:5912:00:00 TO 12:59:5913:00:00 TO 13:59:5914:00:00 TO 14:59:5915:00:00 TO 15:59:5916:00:00 TO 16:59:5917:00:00 TO 17:59:5918:00:00 TO 18:59:5919:00:00 TO 19:59:5920:00:00 TO 20:59:5921:00:00 TO 21:59:5922:00:00 TO 22:59:5923:00:00 TO 23:59:59E100 S100 Submitted by: Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 2 Ad Hoc Report: Name: Date: Description: Seizure Date Seizure Time ALI City Answer Secs Call Type ID ALI Class 1/1/2021 21:10:01 HERMOSA BEACH 6 911 Calls WPH2 1/1/2021 22:09:58 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/2/2021 07:12:36 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/2/2021 13:37:49 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/3/2021 00:46:44 HMB 17 911 Calls WPH2 1/4/2021 17:49:04 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 1/5/2021 16:39:19 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 1/5/2021 19:07:56 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 1/5/2021 22:07:26 HERM BCH 3 911 Calls WPH2 1/6/2021 16:51:15 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/6/2021 17:39:18 HERM BCH 39 911 Calls WPH2 1/7/2021 16:45:30 HERMOSA BEACH 49 911 Calls WPH2 1/7/2021 20:09:28 HB 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/7/2021 22:18:18 HERM BCH 20 911 Calls WPH2 1/9/2021 05:01:09 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/9/2021 05:03:17 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/9/2021 22:16:06 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/9/2021 22:49:22 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 1/10/2021 01:02:05 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/10/2021 16:15:08 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/10/2021 18:11:31 HERM BCH 24 911 Calls WPH2 1/11/2021 16:08:32 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 1/12/2021 01:56:16 HERM BCH 17 911 Calls WPH2 1/12/2021 10:02:14 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 1/13/2021 04:50:09 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/13/2021 05:33:29 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 1/13/2021 12:39:38 HMB 37 911 Calls WPH2 1/13/2021 13:24:56 HB 36 911 Calls WPH2 1/13/2021 20:21:48 HERMOSA BEACH 36 911 Calls RESD 1/14/2021 03:35:28 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/14/2021 05:04:06 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/14/2021 12:42:54 HERM BCH 36 911 Calls WPH2 1/14/2021 18:04:17 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 1/15/2021 11:56:16 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/15/2021 13:45:54 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/15/2021 18:58:47 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 1/15/2021 21:58:57 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/15/2021 21:59:41 HERMOSA BEACH 1 911 Calls WPH2 1/16/2021 09:07:56 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Hermosa Call Answer Time 2/1/2021 Jan-21 Los Angeles County Fire Submitted by: Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 3 1/16/2021 11:33:19 HERM BCH 73 911 Calls WPH2 1/16/2021 18:26:14 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/17/2021 01:00:00 HMB 1 911 Calls WPH2 1/17/2021 06:24:10 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/17/2021 17:59:21 HERMOSA BEACH 94 911 Calls RESD 1/17/2021 19:20:19 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 1/18/2021 08:26:32 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/18/2021 12:08:28 H B 2 911 Calls VOIP 1/18/2021 18:10:26 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/18/2021 19:06:29 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/19/2021 21:05:37 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/20/2021 09:20:02 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 1/20/2021 17:07:56 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/21/2021 14:03:00 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls BUSN 1/22/2021 07:38:20 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/22/2021 23:18:36 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 1/23/2021 02:21:15 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/24/2021 12:15:33 HMB 7 911 Calls WPH2 1/25/2021 00:21:10 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 1/25/2021 15:40:32 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/26/2021 13:08:27 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 1/27/2021 15:51:51 HERM BCH 4 911 Calls WPH2 1/27/2021 16:31:01 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/27/2021 22:41:20 HERM BCH 1 911 Calls W911 1/28/2021 19:33:43 HMB 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/29/2021 07:33:00 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/29/2021 18:28:37 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/30/2021 07:47:02 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 1/30/2021 11:29:16 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls VOIP 1/30/2021 12:47:13 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 1/30/2021 16:08:20 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 1/30/2021 16:38:52 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/30/2021 19:51:29 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/30/2021 19:52:43 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/30/2021 19:53:41 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 1/30/2021 20:28:39 HERMOSA BEACH 20 911 Calls VOIP 1/30/2021 21:01:01 HERMOSA BEACH 79 911 Calls RESD 1/31/2021 09:36:02 HERMOSA BEACH 2 911 Calls RESD 1/31/2021 17:32:48 HERM BCH 2 911 Calls WPH2 Average Call Answer Time (Seconds)9 Submitted by: Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 4 McCormick Ambulance January 2021 Total Number of Dispatched Calls Dispatched Calls Totals Transported 50 Cancelled 41 Grand Total 91 NOTE: None 50, 55% 41, 45% Total Dispatched Calls Transported Cancelled Submitted by: Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 5 Calls per the day of the week Day of the Week Completed Cancelled Total Sunday 10 6 16 Monday 3 3 6 Tuesday 4 5 9 Wednesday 7 8 15 Thursday 7 5 12 Friday 8 2 10 Saturday 11 12 23 Grand Total 50 41 91 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Completed Canceled Submitted by: Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 6 Response by the Time of Day Time of Day Total Response 00:00:00 TO 00:59:59 3 01:00:00 TO 01:59:59 6 02:00:00 TO 02:59:59 2 03:00:00 TO 03:59:59 0 04:00:00 TO 04:59:59 2 05:00:00 TO 05:59:59 1 06:00:00 TO 06:59:59 3 07:00:00 TO 07:59:59 5 08:00:00 TO 08:59:59 1 09:00:00 TO 09:59:59 4 10:00:00 TO 10:59:59 4 11:00:00 TO 11:59:59 3 12:00:00 TO 12:59:59 5 13:00:00 TO 13:59:59 5 14:00:00 TO 14:59:59 2 15:00:00 TO 15:59:59 4 16:00:00 TO 16:59:59 11 17:00:00 TO 17:59:59 3 18:00:00 TO 18:59:59 10 19:00:00 TO 19:59:59 6 20:00:00 TO 20:59:59 2 21:00:00 TO 21:59:59 3 22:00:00 TO 22:59:59 4 23:00:00 TO 23:59:59 2 Grand Total 91 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 00:00:00 TO 00:59:5901:00:00 TO 01:59:5902:00:00 TO 02:59:5903:00:00 TO 03:59:5904:00:00 TO 04:59:5905:00:00 TO 05:59:5906:00:00 TO 06:59:5907:00:00 TO 07:59:5908:00:00 TO 08:59:5909:00:00 TO 09:59:5910:00:00 TO 10:59:5911:00:00 TO 11:59:5912:00:00 TO 12:59:5913:00:00 TO 13:59:5914:00:00 TO 14:59:5915:00:00 TO 15:59:5916:00:00 TO 16:59:5917:00:00 TO 17:59:5918:00:00 TO 18:59:5919:00:00 TO 19:59:5920:00:00 TO 20:59:5921:00:00 TO 21:59:5922:00:00 TO 22:59:5923:00:00 TO 23:59:59Time of Day Responses Submitted by: Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 7 Response Times Within Allowable Time Delayed Response Cancelled Total Code 3: Response Time of 8:59 or less 9 3 0 12 Code 2: Response Time of 15:00 or less 38 0 0 38 Cancelled Responses 0 0 41 41 Grand Total 47 3 41 91 Submitted by: Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator 8 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0143 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 2, 2021 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of February 2, 2021. Attachments: Minutes of February 2, 2021 Approved: John Jones, Interim Community Resources Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ MINUTES REGULAR MEETING of the PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION February 2, 2021 – Council Chambers, City Hall 1315 Valley Drive – 7:00 P.M. Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission Lauren Pizer Mains, Chairperson Barbara Ellman, Vice Chairperson Jani Lange Jessica Guheen Traci Horowitz ************************************************************************************************************************ THIS MEETING WAS HELD PURSUANT TO EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 ISSUED BY GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM ON MARCH 17, 2020. ANY OR ALL COMMISSIONERS MAY ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE BY TELECONFERENCE/VIRTUAL MEETING. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE BY TELECONFERENCE. ************************************************************************************************************************ Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission agendas and staff reports are available for review on the City’s web site at www.hermosabeach.gov Written materials distributed to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission within 72 hours of the meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the Community Resources Department during normal business hours from Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call Present: Vice Chairperson Ellman, and Commissioners Lange, Guheen and Horowitz, Senior Recreation Supervisor Lisa Nichols, Community Resources Manager Kelly Orta, and Associate City Attorney Patrick Donegan. Absent: Chairperson Pizer-Mains. 4. Announcements 5. Presentations A. None 6. Miscellaneous Items and Reports – Community Resources Manager A. Introduction of John Jones, Interim Community Resources Manager B. COVID-19 Updates C. Updates Regarding Items Previously on the Commission’s Agenda D. Pickleball Equipment Testing E. Hermosa Beach Education Foundation Event 7. Public Comment Anyone wishing to address the Commission on items pertaining to parks and recreation that are not listed on the agenda may do so at this time. The Brown Act generally prohibits the Commission from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. Comments from the public are limited to three minutes per speaker. None. 8. Correspondence A. None 9. Consent Calendar A. Approval of the Regular Meeting Action Minutes of January 5, 2021 B. Approval of the December 2020 Activity Report Motion by Commissioner Horowitz to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Lange seconded the motion. Motion passed with a 4-0 vote. 10. Items Removed from the Consent Calendar for Separate Discussion None. 11. Public Hearings A. Approval of the Southern California Beach Volleyball (SCVA) Beach Events to the 2021 Special Event Calendar on Saturday, March 27; Saturday, April 10; and Saturday, May 8 - Sunday, May 9 on the Beach Volleyball Courts North of the Pier Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission hold a Public Hearing to make a recommendation to the City Council to approve the inclusion of the Southern California Volleyball Association’s (SCVA) beach events on the 2021 special event calendar on the beach volleyball courts north of the pier on the following dates: • Saturday, March 27 • Saturday, April 10; and • Saturday, May 8 – Sunday, May 9 Motion by Commissioner Lange to approve the Southern California Beach Volleyball (SCVA) Beach Events to the 2021 Special Event Calendar. Commissioner Horowitz seconded the motion. Motion passed with a 4-0 vote. 12. Matters for Commission Consideration A. Approval of the 2021 Impact Level II Events Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Commission approve the addition of the following Impact Level II Special Events onto the 202 1 Special Event calendar: • AAU Southern Pacific Beach Volleyball Series on the volleyball courts north of the Pier on Sunday, March 14; Sunday, April 11; Sunday, April 25; Saturday, May 1 - Sunday, May 2; Sunday, May 16; Sunday, May 23; Saturday, October 2; Saturday, October 9; Saturday, November 20; and Sunday, December 5; • Beach Tennis Tournaments on the beach tennis courts on the following Saturdays and Sundays: March 6 - March 7; April 10 - April 11; September 18 - September 19; October 16 - October 17; and October 30 - October 31; • CBVA Tournaments on the volleyball courts north of the Pier on Sunday, March 28; Saturday, April 17; and Saturday, May 15; • Community Menorah Lighting on Pier Plaza Sunday, November 28; • Easter Sunrise Mass on the beach south of the Pier on Sunday, April 4; • Endless Summer Classic Car Show on Pier Plaza on Saturday, May 1; • Hope Chapel Church Picnic at Valley Park on Sunday, September 19; • Hope Chapel Easter Egg Hunt at Valley Park on Saturday, April 3; • Hope Chapel Hermosa Beach Sunrise Service on Pier Plaza on Sunday, April 4; • Smackfest Volleyball Tournament on the volleyball courts south of the Pier on Saturday, July 31; and • Walk to End Alzheimer’s on Pier Plaza and the Strand north of the Pier on Saturday, October 2. Coming forward to address the Commission at this time: (1:01:45) Chris Brown, CBVA Tournaments Representative Ginger Young, Beach Tennis Tournaments Representative Bill Sigler, Smackfest Volleyball Tournament Representative Motion by Commissioner Lange to approve the addition of all proposed Impact Level II Special Events onto the 2021 Special Event calendar. Commissioner Horowitz seconded the motion. Motion passed with a 4-0 vote. B. Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Review Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission provide input to the City Council on Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) related to the purview of the Commission and the Community Resources Department for the City Council’s consideration of the 2021/2022 Fiscal Budget. Motion by Commissioner Horowitz to approve the review of the Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Budget. Commissioner Lange seconded the motion. Motion passed with a 4-0 vote. 13. Commissioner’s Reports A. Sub-committees i. Special Event (Lange and Ellman) ii. Community Theatre (Lange and Pizer Mains) iii. Municipal Leases (Pizer Mains and Horowitz) iv. Community Resources Department Use Policies (Ellman and Guheen) v. Clark Building Improvements (Ellman and Pizer Mains) vi. Naming Policy (Horowitz and Guheen) B. Commission Liaison Roles i. Surfers Walk of Fame (Lange) ii. South Park (Guheen) iii. Access Hermosa (Ellman) – on hold 14. Items Requested by Commissioners A. None 15. Other Matters 16. Adjournment This meeting was adjourned to the regular, March 2 meeting by Vice Chairpeson Ellman at 8:45pm. FUTURE COMMISSION MEETINGS AND CITY HOLIDAYS • PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETINGS o Tuesday, March 2, 2021 - 7:00PM o Wednesday, April 12, 2021 - 7:00PM o Tuesday, May 4, 2021 - 7:00PM o Tuesday, June 1, 2021 - 7:00PM o Tuesday, July 6, 2021 - 7:00PM o Tuesday, August 3, 2021 - 7:00PM o Thursday, September 9, 2021 - 7:00PM o Tuesday, October 5, 2021 - 7:00PM o Tuesday, November 2, 2021 - 7:00PM o Tuesday, December 7, 2021 - 7:00PM • CITY OFFICES CLOSED FRIDAY – SUNDAY AND ON THE FOLLOWING DAYS: o Monday, February 15, 2021 - President's Day o Monday, May 31, 2021 - Memorial Day o Monday, July 5, 2021 - Independence Day Observed o Monday, September 6, 2021 - Labor Day o Thursday, November 11, 2021 - Veteran's Day o Thursday, November 25, 2021 - Thanksgiving Day City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0165 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF RECLASSIFICATION OF PERSONNEL ANALYST TO HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST, CLASS SPECIFICATION FOR HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST AND CONTINUE TO ESTABLISH THE POSITION IN THE UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE GROUP (Human Resources Manager Vanessa Godinez) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1.Approve reclassification of the position of Personnel Analyst to Human Resources Analyst; and 2.Approve the class specification for Human Resources Analyst; and 3.Affirm that the bargaining unit for this classification remains with the Unrepresented Employee Group. Executive Summary: In the current Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Budget,the Human Resources Department has two positions, Human Resources Manager and Personnel Analyst.The position title of Personnel Analyst is antiquated and does not align with industry standard.Staff recommends reclassifying the position title to Human Resources Analyst to better align with the industry standard.The class specification for Human Resources Analyst was developed to ensure effective and sustainable operations within the Human Resources Department.The Hermosa Beach Civil Service Board considered and approved the class specification on March 3,2021.In order to finalize these changes,staff recommends that Council approve the reclassification of Personnel Analyst to Human Resources Analyst,approve the class specification,and affirm that the bargaining unit for this position remain with the Unrepresented Employee Group. Background: Under general direction,the position of the Human Resources Analyst would assist in administering the day-to-day operation of the Human Resource’s department;perform a variety of professional level administrative,technical,and analytical duties in the areas of recruitment and selection, employee benefit plans,workers'compensation,general liability claims,compensation and performance evaluation programs,prepare,process,and maintain employee records and data,and assist City staff and the general public.The class specification (Attachment 1)for this position was City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0165 assist City staff and the general public.The class specification (Attachment 1)for this position was approved by the Hermosa Beach Civil Service Board on March 3, 2021. General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: Governance Goal 1. A high degree of transparency and integrity in the decision-making process. ·Policy 1.2:Strategic planning.Regularly discuss and set priorities at the City Council and management level to prioritize work programs and staffing needs. Fiscal Impact: The salary and benefit costs for this position have been approved in the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Budget. Attachments: 1. Human Resources Analyst Class Specification Respectfully Submitted by: Vanessa Godinez, Human Resources Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST DEFINITION Under general direction, to perform a variety of professional level administrative, technical, and analytical duties in support of the City’s Human Resources and Risk Management Division including in the areas of recruitment and selection, employee benefit plans, workers' compensation and general liability claims, and salary and performance evaluation programs; to prepare, process, and maintain employee records and data; and to assist City staff and the general public and provide information related to specific program area of assignment. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Performs a variety of professional level administrative, technical, and analytical duties in support of the City’s Human Resources and Risk Management Division including in the areas of recruitment and selection, employee benefit plans, workers' compensation and general liability claims, and salary and performance evaluation programs; plans, coordinates and performs administrative assignments and special projects; works as a team member in a dynamic environment; recommends and implements improvements to policies and procedures; ensures accuracy, completeness and compliance with City standards, policies, and procedures; delivers outstanding internal and external customer service participates in the recruitment and selection process including responding to inquiries regarding the recruitment and selection process; drafts and places job announcement advertisements; collects applications and assists with job application screening; assists in the administration/proctoring of employment examinations; makes arrangements for testing facilities; organizes, corrects and scores exams; organizes oral interview boards and orients oral board raters; prepares and maintains eligibility lists according to established procedures; notifies candidates of results; provides new employee orientation; explains City employment policies and procedures; attends Civil Service Board meetings; processes personnel action forms; distributes employee performance review schedule; maintains personnel records; completes employment verifications; reconciles bank statements for the liability and workers’ compensation trust accounts; processes required documents for workers’ compensation and general liability claims and coordinates claims activities with third party administrators; arranges pre-employment and annual physical examinations; verifies accuracy of invoices received for physical examinations; explains employment benefits and assists in coordinating enrollment and changes in insurance plans for employees and retirees; assists in the coordination of open enrollment; conducts surveys of salary and benefits; compiles and prepares summaries of data; composes and types correspondence from oral and written instructions, and initiates/drafts routine correspondence; complies data, proofreads, and copies information pertaining to employer-employee relations including negotiations; assists in monitoring and preparation of department budget; responds to inquiries over the telephone, in person, and/or by email; participates in committees related to planning and organizing employee events including but not limited to all City employee 2 meetings, annual awards dinner, and related events; prepares, submits, performs analytic research and maintains a variety of reports; assists other clerical personnel assigned to the administrative offices; receives, sorts incoming and outgoing U.S. mail; answers the general information line for the City; performs related work as required. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Knowledge of: Operations, services, and activities of a human resources program; principles and practices of human resources administration including recruitment and selection, employee benefit plans, workers' compensation and general liability claims, and salary and performance evaluation programs; personnel policies and procedures of a municipal personnel department; principles of research, record keeping and report preparation; methods and techniques for record keeping and filing public relations techniques and procedures; conducts duties, responsibilities, tasks, and assignments with a constructive, cooperative, positive and professional attitude and demeanor; understands the importance of integrity and confidentiality and holds it to a high standard; communicates effectively orally and in writing with the public and fellow employees; methods and techniques of proper phone etiquette; exercises tact, self-restraint, and good judgement, takes initiative to achieve positive, timely results with diplomatic skills and ethical conduct; ability to use basic office equipment including computers and office applications such as word processing, spreadsheets, and statistical databases;; Ability to: perform a variety of professional level administrative, technical, and analytical duties and activities of a general and specialized nature in support of the Human Resources Division; make independent decisions; organize and prioritize work, coordinating several activities and meeting critical deadlines; research, collect, compile, and analyze a variety of data; type or enter data at a speed necessary for successful job performance; interpret and understand policies and procedures; perform clerical tasks requiring a high degree of accuracy; maintain confidential records and files; review work for accuracy and completeness; work independently in the absence of supervision; compose correspondence and compile and arrange data in a readable and comprehensible manner; understand the organization and operation of the City and of outside agencies as necessary to assume assigned responsibilities; deal successfully with the public, in person and over the telephone; operate office equipment including computers and supporting word processing, spreadsheet, and database applications; communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing; establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Education and Experience: Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: This position requires a college degree from an accredited college or university with a degree in Human Resources, Business Administration, Public Administration, or a related field and two years of increasingly responsible professional human resources administration experience, preferably in a municipal human resources department. Experience with NeoGov or similar online application tracking system is preferred. 3 Licenses/Certificates: A valid Class C California Driver's License with a safe driving record is required and must be maintained as valid during course of employment. In accordance with California Government Code Section 3100, City of Hermosa Beach employees, in the event of a disaster, are considered disaster service workers and may be asked to protect the health, safety, lives, and property of the people of the State. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be ma de to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with extensive public contact and constant interruptions. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; to occasionally stoop, bend, kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; to travel to other locations using various modes of private and commercial transportation; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. Approved by the Civil Service Board: March 3, 2021 Approved by the City Council: City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0168 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 VISTA SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE (Environmental Analyst Leeanne Singleton) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Interagency Cost Sharing Agreement (Attachment 1)between the Hermosa Beach City School District (School District)and the City of Hermosa Beach (City)for the City’s proportional share of work to be performed by the School District’s authorized contractors. Executive Summary: In June 2016,voters approved the Measure S school bond and created the Measure S School Facilities Project,which includes the reconstruction of North School (since named Vista School)and revitalization/modernization of the School District's two current schools.To comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),the School District prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)for the North School Reconstruction Project and took action to certify the Final EIR and approve the project on January 9, 2019. Following certification of the Final EIR by the School Board,the City and School District representatives met to collaborate on the conditions to be included in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)memorializing the commitment of both parties to work together collaboratively to safely manage transportation,traffic,and student loading and unloading activities,primarily through the development of a Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP)for the streets and neighborhood surrounding North School.On February 27,2019,the City Council and School Board approved the MOU. As part of the MOU,the City and District agreed to form a stakeholder group that would share information and gather public input on relevant topics to be included in the NTMP.Over the last 12 months,City and District staff and the consulting team collaborated on the evaluation of the study area and facilitation of a stakeholder working group and community workshops to inform the development of the NTMP. A draft NTMP was released in January 2020 and presented to the City Council,School Board,and City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0168 A draft NTMP was released in January 2020 and presented to the City Council,School Board,and the community for initial feedback and discussion ahead of formal action by the City Council and School Board.Community feedback on the January 2020 Draft NTMP was solicited through February 28, 2020. A revised draft NTMP was presented to the City’s Public Works Commission in July 2020.In August and September 2020,additional analysis was conducted on the revised draft NTMP by City and School District staff.The City Council and School Board adopted the NTMP in October 2020 and staff from the City and School District are working to implement the items recommended for near-term implementation in the NTMP. The School District and their contractor,Erickson Hall,are working to complete both on-site and off- site improvements including many of the near-term measures identified in the NTMP with a planned school opening date of April 12,2021.Since the costs to implement the near-term recommendations of the NTMP are shared between the City and School District,staff have prepared a Draft Interagency Cost Sharing Agreement,to identify the measures proposed for implementation and the City’s proportional share of work to be performed by the School District’s authorized contractors. Analysis: Interagency Cost Sharing Agreement The School District has retained construction contractor Erickson Hall to perform the construction work for Vista School as well as the off-site improvements to the public right-of-way adjacent to the school site.The off-site improvement work to be performed by the contractor on behalf of the School District already includes street and sidewalk improvements adjacent to the school site.The implementation of an Interagency Cost Sharing Agreement (Attachment 1)would allow the School District to pay its contractor to perform additional street and sidewalk improvements in the area around the school and allow the City to reimburse the School District for the City’s share of said costs.This arrangement would ensure that both Parties’traffic improvements would be consistent with the NTMP and result in cost and time savings. The total estimated costs to implement the striping and curb ramp upgrades as listed in Attachment 1 is $46,618.32.Of that total,the District would be responsible for $22,536.00 and the City would be responsible for $24,082.32. While the Interagency Cost Sharing Agreement does not include all of the NTMP near-term measures,it does cover those measures which the City cannot complete with existing staff resources and would otherwise need to hire a contractor to perform the work. There are two types of additional near-term measures that are not covered in the Interagency Cost Sharing Agreement and will be implemented following traffic engineering design and additional resident input-the proposed one-way conversion of 26th Street and the installation of speedhumpsCity of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 2 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0168 resident input-the proposed one-way conversion of 26th Street and the installation of speedhumps proposed for Park Avenue/25th Street,Silverstrand Avenue,and Myrtle Avenue.Further coordination with residents along these streets is expected in the coming months,and the City will implement these measures this spring or summer. Other Implementation Efforts There are additional non-infrastructure measures included in the NTMP to be implemented. Brief updates on these non-infrastructure recommendations are provided below: ·California Office of Traffic Safety Grant for Education and Enforcement Measures-the City and Hermosa Beach Police Department submitted a grant application in January 2021 to the California Office of Traffic Safety that,if awarded,would include funding for school area traffic enforcement efforts and bike and pedestrian safety curriculum/training/materials for students helping to implement safe routes to school education and enforcement recommendations included in the NTMP. ·Safe Routes to School Trip Planner-the City and School District have collaborated to develop a Safe Routes to School trip planner that identifies preferred routes based on safe routes to school infrastructure, school entrances/access points, the area of the City students are coming from, and the mode of transportation students choose to use. The tool can be used to plan routes for each of the City’s three public schools and can be found online here: <https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/1cd58235054346948624d123291ca5de> ·Crossing Guard Contract and Locations-the City’s Crossing Guard Contract,managed by the Police Department,has been updated to incorporate crossing guards as identified in the NTMP for the area around Vista School. ·Adaptive Management Program Pre-Project Traffic Counts-in February 2021,the City conducted traffic volume and speed counts on streets surrounding Vista School to supplement traffic count data collected in 2019 and 2016 as part of the project EIR.Additional counts will be conducted following school opening to inform the adaptive management program and identify where additional measures may be warranted or adjusted to facilitate traffic safety in the neighborhood surrounding Vista School. General Plan Consistency PLAN Hermosa,the City’s General Plan,was adopted by the City Council in August 2017.The development of the NTMP related to North School would help implement our collective community vision to provide exceptional local schools to the Hermosa Beach community and support several goals of the Governance Element, Land Use Element, and Mobility Element. Governance Element Goal 1 - A high degree of transparency and integrity in the decision-making process. ·1.6 Long-term considerations.Prioritize decisions that provide long-term community benefit and discourage decisions that provide short-term community benefit but reduce long-term City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 3 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0168 and discourage decisions that provide short-term community benefit but reduce long-term opportunities. Goal 2 - The community is active and engaged in decision-making process. ·2.7 Major planning efforts.Require major planning efforts,policies,or projects to include a public engagement effort. Land Use Element Goal 7 -Adequate space and appropriate integration of community and school facilities that support physical activity, civic life and social connections for residents of all ages and interests. ·7.2 Joint use with schools.Where appropriate,maintain and enhance joint use agreements with Hermosa Beach City School District to maximize community use of school facilities and expand school use of City park facilities and community space to expand opportunities for physical activity. ·7.3 School modernization upgrades.Support Hermosa Beach City School District plans to renovate and modernize school facilities to meet evolving educational needs in a manner that minimizes burdens to adjacent neighborhoods. Mobility Element Goal 2 -A public realm that is safe,comfortable,and convenient for travel via foot,bicycle,public transit,and automobile and creates vibrant,people-oriented public spaces that encourage active living. ·2.1 Prioritize public rights-of-way.Prioritize improvements of public rights-of-way that provide heightened levels of safe,comfortable and attractive public spaces for all non-motorized travelers while balancing the needs of efficient vehicular circulation. ·2.2 Encourage traffic calming.Encourage traffic calming policies and techniques to improve the safety and efficient movement of people and vehicles along residential areas and highly trafficked corridors. Goal 3 -Public rights-of-way supporting a multimodal and people-oriented transportation system that provides diversity and flexibility on how users choose to be mobile. ·3.3 Active transportation.Require commercial development or redevelopment projects and residential projects with four or more units to accommodate active transportation by providing on-site amenities,necessary connections to adjacent existing and planned pedestrian and bicycle networks, and incorporate people-oriented design practices. ·3.9 Access for emergency vehicles.Ensure that emergency vehicles have secure and convenient access to the City’s street network. ·3.10 Require ADA standards.Require that all public rights-of-way be designed per Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)standards by incorporating crosswalks,curb ramps,pedestrian signals, and other components to provide ease of access for disabled persons. Goal 7 -A transportation system that results in zero transportation-related fatalities and which minimizes injuries. ·7.1 Safe public rights-of-way.Encourage that all public rights-of-way are safe for all users at City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 4 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0168 ·7.1 Safe public rights-of-way.Encourage that all public rights-of-way are safe for all users at all times of day where users of all ages and ability feel comfortable participating in both motorized and non-motorized travel. ·7.2 Manage speeds.Monitor vehicle speeds through traffic controls,speed limits,and design features with the intended purpose of minimizing vehicle accidents,creating a pedestrian and bicycle environment, and discouraging cut-through traffic. ·7.4 Traffic safety programs.Prioritize traffic safety programs oriented towards safe access to schools and community facilities that focus on walking, biking, and driving in school zones. Fiscal Impact: The City has appropriated $100,000 in Fiscal Year 2020-21 from the Capital Improvement Fund to implement the near-term construction related recommendations and an additional $5,000 to support safe routes to school programming/implementation.The total estimated costs to implement the near- term striping,signage and curb ramp upgrades is $46,618 of which the City is responsible for $24,082.32.Other near-term measures such as the proposed one-way street conversion and installation of speed humps will be implemented at a later date utilizing the Capital Improvement Funds appropriated for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Attachments: 1.Draft Interagency Cost Sharing Agreement Respectfully Submitted by: Leeanne Singleton, Environmental Analyst Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Joanna Gin, Assistant City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 5 of 5 powered by Legistar™ 1 INTERAGENCY COST SHARING AGREEMENT This Interagency Cost Sharing Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of March , 2021 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation (the “City”) and the HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a school district (“School District”). City and School District are hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as the “Parties” or individually as a “Party.” RECITALS A. The Parties have developed a Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan (“NTMP”) for the North Elementary School, which was renamed to the Hermosa Vista School (“Vista School”) in October 2020, to address traffic concerns on nearby residential streets and implement traffic solutions/recommendations in accordance with the NTMP more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and, B. Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference describes the near-term projects that the City and School District will ach install before the Vista School opens and outlines the financial arrangement between the Parties regarding the installation of such improvements on the Vista School site and its adjacent public right-of-way; and, C. The School District has already retained construction contractor Erickson Hall (“Erickson Hall”) to perform the construction work for the Vista School Reconstruction project (“Project”); and, D. The School District will pay Erickson Hall to install the near term infrastructure improvements (“Improvements”) as described in Exhibit B, and the City will reimburse the School District for its share of costs for Erickson Hall to install the Improvements; and, E. The Parties find that the Improvements are not subject to public bidding requirements under Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment Agency, 104 Cal.App.3d 631, 636 (1980) because the advertisement for competitive bids would be undesirable and will not produce an advantage for the following reasons: the School District has already awarded its construction contract for the Vista School project to Erickson Hall, a contractor with considerable school construction experience and skills through a public bidding process; the Improvements must be installed by April 2021; the contractor is already doing similar improvements related to the project within the public right-of-way; the Vista School is scheduled to open on April 12, 2021 and requiring the Parties to satisfy additional public bidding requirements for the Improvements would delay the completion of traffic safety improvements that support the safe and efficient drop-off and pick- up of students and traffic patterns in the neighborhood surrounding the school; allowing the School District to pay its contractor to perform the Improvements and the City to reimburse the School District for said costs would ensure that both Parties’ traffic improvements would be consistent with the NTMP and result in cost and time savings by not subjecting the 2 Improvements to public bidding. F. The Parties desire to enter into this Agreement in order to share the cost for payment of the Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises, and conditions set forth in this Agreement, and for other good, valuable, and adequate consideration, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Cost Sharing Between the Parties: The City and School District shall each be responsible for the costs of infrastructure improvements as follows: (a) The School District is responsible for the share of costs of Improvements as described in Exhibit B. (b) The School District shall be initially responsible for all implementation costs of the Improvements described in Exhibit B. The City shall reimburse the School District for a portion of all actual costs of Improvements as described in Exhibit B. This compensation shall be due and payable to the School District at the time the Improvements are completed and the School District invoices the City for such reimbursement. The City agrees to pay the School District within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice. The City shall not be responsible for payment of any Improvements not listed as Improvements in Exhibit B, without the prior written consent of the City being requested to pay such additional amount. (c) If the City objects to any portion of the invoice, it shall provide written notice to the School District of said objections within ten (10) days from the receipt of the invoice and the Parties shall then engage in good faith efforts to resolve such issues through informal discussions. In the event the City does not submit such an objection to the School District within said 10-day period, the City will be deemed to have approved said invoice. In regard to any objection regarding the services performed by School District’s contractor, the Parties shall jointly seek to resolve such issues with said contractor. 2. Effective Date: This Agreement shall be effective on the date first written above. 3. Term and Termination: The term of this Agreement shall be from the Effective Date to the date of completion of performance of the Improvements by the School District’s contractor in accordance with Exhibit B. This Agreement shall remain in effect during the term unless earlier terminated under the following procedures: (a) Notice and Opportunity to Cure: If either Party to this Agreement believes that the other Party has failed to perform any obligation of that Party in accordance with the terms of this Agreement (“Default”), the Party alleging the Default shall provide written notice (“Default Notice”) to the other Party, setting forth the nature of the alleged Default. Unless otherwise provided by a specific term of this Agreement, the Party claimed to be in Default shall have: (i) with respect to a Default involving the payment of money, ten (10) days after its receipt of the Default Notice to completely cure such Default, and (ii) with respect to any other type of Default, thirty (30) days from the receipt of the Default Notice to completely cure such Default 3 or, if such Default cannot reasonably be cured within such thirty (30) day period, to commence the cure of such Default within the thirty (30) day period and diligently prosecute the cure to completion thereafter. If the Party claimed to be in Default does not cure such Default within the time periods and procedures as set forth herein, the Party alleging Default may then terminate this Agreement. 4. General Provisions: (a) Relationship of the Parties: Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed by the Parties or by any third person to create the relationship of principal and agent, or partnership or joint venture, or any association between the School District and the City, and none of the provisions contained in this Agreement or any act of the Parties shall be deemed to create any relationship other than as specified herein, nor shall this Agreement be construed, except as expressly provided herein, to authorize either Party to act as the agent for the other. (b) Indemnification. The School District agrees to protect, indemnify and save harmless City and its officers, officials and employees from and against all claims, demands and causes or action on account of personal injuries, property damage or death arising out of the negligent or wrongful performance of work performed by the School District hereunder. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions will survive termination of this Agreement. (c) Entire Agreement: This Agreement is intended by the Parties as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of their agreement and it supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, as to this subject matter. This Agreement may be modified only upon the mutual written agreement of the Parties hereto. (d) Notices: Written notices to be given to either Party must be given by personal delivery or by registered or certified mail addressed and delivered as set forth below. Other correspondence and invoices may be sent by first-class mail or email addressed and delivered as set forth below: City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager Email: suja@hermosabeach.gov Hermosa Beach City School District 425 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Jason Johnson, Superintendent Email: jjohnson@hbcsd.org Mail to: 1645 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (e) Representation of Authority: Each Party represents to the other that it has the authority to enter into this Agreement and that the individual signing this Agreement on behalf of 4 their respective Parties has the authority to execute this Agreement and to bind their respective Parties to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. (f) Incorporation of Recitals: The Recitals set forth above are incorporated herein and made an operative part of this Agreement. (g) Invalidity and Severability: If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by its respective duly authorized officers. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By:______________________________ Suja Lowenthal, City Manager HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT By: ______________________________ Jason Johnson, Superintendent 5 EXHIBIT A Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan Web url: https://www.hermosabeach.gov/home/showpublisheddocument?id=15435 NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 1 OCTOBER 2020 acknowledgements NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Council Mary Campbell, Mayor Justin Massey, May Pro Tem Hany Fangary Michael Detoy Stacey Armato Staff Suja Lowenthal, City Manager Leeanne Singleton, Environmental Analyst HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Board of Trustees Jennifer Cole, President Stephen McCall, Clerk Douglas Gardner Margaret Bove-LaMonica Barbara Zondiros Staff Pat Escalante, Former Superintendent Jason Johnson, Superintendent NORTH SCHOOL NTMP STAKEHOLDER GROUP Lucy Brining Scott Davey Robert Fortunato Melyssa Guerry Samantha Kuhr Steve Moseley Steve Mullins Nikki Nance Steve Peterson Christine Shultz Ralph Spargo Peter Spragg FEHR AND PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS Steve Brown Rachel Neumann Melody Wu THE HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY The City of Hermosa Beach and Hermosa Beach City School District would like to thank the community for their interest and participation in this process. Your participation in this collaborative dialogue has led to the development of a comprehensive and coordinated plan to address public safety and traffic flow in and around the North School neighborhood and we are one step closer to fulfilling our collective community vision to provide exceptional local schools to the Hermosa Beach community. table of contents 4 Hermosa Beach 1 introduction 5 2 history 7 3 planning process 9 4 ntmp recommendations 11 5 implementation 23 6 adaptive management program 27 appendices 29 1 introduction NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 5 COMMUNITY CONTEXT The City of Hermosa Beach is located within the southwestern coastal portion of Los Angeles County in what is commonly referred to locally as the “South Bay” area. The City is bounded on the north by the City of Manhattan Beach, on the south by the City of Redondo Beach, on the east by the City of Redondo Beach and the City of Manhattan Beach, and on the west by the Pacific Ocean. The city limits for Hermosa Beach encompass a relatively small land area, approximately 1.4 square miles. School Configuration The Hermosa Beach City School District provides public education in the City of Hermosa Beach providing instruction for students in Kindergarten through eighth grade. High school age residents of Hermosa Beach attend Mira Costa High School or Redondo Union High School in Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach, respectively. In June 2016 the voters of Hermosa Beach passed Measure S and the Hermosa Beach City School District created the Measure S School Facilities Program which called for the reconstruction of North School and the revitalization/modernization of the School District's two current schools, to create a three-school district in which schools are organized by grade level. Safe Routes to School Network The Mobility Element of PLAN Hermosa, the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach identifies a proposed Safe Routes to School Network that, when implemented, connects each of the District’s three school campuses, a private school located in east Hermosa Beach, and the high schools located in the city’s neighboring jurisdictions. The intended safe routes to school network was developed based on input from parents of students through a 2016 survey and through collaboration between the City and School District to encourage students and parents that wish to walk or bike to and from school. The network is provided in Figure 1 and assists in identifying locations for crossing guards, assessing capital improvement needs, and evaluating safety and enforcement measures. WHAT IS A NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN? A Neighborhood Transportation Management Program or Plan (NTMP) is a community-based process that begins and ends with residents and community members to find solutions to traffic concerns on neighborhood streets within a defined area. The objective is to provide safe, comfortable streets and improve the quality of life in our neighborhoods by developing and implementing innovative and effective transportation solutions to make residential streets safer and more comfortable for everyone to use. This program provides community members the opportunity to not only voice their concerns regarding traffic related issues such as speeding, traffic collisions, and cut-through traffic, but also work to solve traffic related concerns by considering various traffic calming solutions. As options are considered, the surrounding street network must be carefully evaluated to avoid shifting impacts from one area to another. Strategies to address these issues generally come from a large toolbox of improvements that can be implemented include updating street signs, adding pavement markers and roadway striping, increased enforcement, and items such as traffic diverters and speed lumps and are tailored based on the strategies that are likely to be most effective in addressing the specific traffic concerns of the neighborhood. The NTMP process duration varies depending on the severity of the issues, size of the neighborhood study area, level of community engagement needed, and the types of improvements recommended. For less complex issues, traffic calming improvements may be implemented within a few months. For projects that require substantial design and construction, the process may take up to a year to develop and longer to implement. Once implemented, additional data is typically collected to compare pre and post implementation scenarios and determine whether the measures implemented are effectively addressing the concerns identified in the NTMP. This iterative process provides opportunities to refine and improve the solutions implemented either in the affected neighborhood or in other similar NTMP efforts. Figure 1 – Intended Safe Route to School Network 6 Hermosa Beach Figure 2 – North School Study Area STUDY AREA North Elementary School is located at 417 25th Street in the northern part of Hermosa Beach, north of 25th Street, east of Myrtle Avenue, south of 26th Street, and west of Valley Park. Morningside Drive dead- ends at the southeast edge of the site and picks up north of the site at the intersection of 26th Street. The streets directly adjacent to the school are narrow residential streets and the nearest arterial streets are Gould Avenue to the north and Valley Drive to the east. The Study Area for the Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan includes the local streets immediately surrounding the school site and is generally bounded by Ardmore Dr to the east, 27th St/Gould Ave to the north, Manhattan Ave to the west, and 24th St to the south (with the intersection of Monterey Blvd and Park Blvd also included, as shown in Figure 2. NORTH SCHOOL PROJECT DESIGN The improvements at North School include construction of a two-story classroom and administration building (main building), multipurpose building, loading and parking areas, play areas, and associated school improvements. An asphalt playground will be developed between the two buildings, and a natural turf field will be installed in the eastern portion of the site; the field will be supported above the grade of the hillside by a retaining wall. A surface parking lot with 41 stalls will be developed in the western portion of the site, and vehicular access to the site was proposed from 25th and 26th Streets. North School is planned to serve the District’s 3rd and 4th grade students and is designed to accommodate a maximum enrollment of 510 students. While View School is under construction in 2021, North School is anticipated to accommodate the District’s 2nd, 3rd, and 4th grade students estimated at approximately 400 students in 2021. Vehicular access to the site will be from 25th street; pedestrian access would be from four access points: 25th Street with direct access from the proposed passenger loading area on 25th Street, 26th Street at the eastern perimeter of the parking lot with direct access from the proposed passenger loading area on Myrtle Avenue, 26th Street at the intersection of Morningside Drive, and end of the cul-de-sac on 26th Street in the southeast portion of the campus NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN GOALS The City of Hermosa Beach and the Hermosa Beach City School District sought the development of the Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan for the neighborhood surrounding North Elementary School to achieve the following goals: 1. Identify solutions that will enhance public safety and traffic flow at North School without causing delays in the school’s construction, which may include additional offsite loading and unloading zones on public property. 2. Maximize the efficient use of limited funds of the City and School District and leverages outside funding opportunities. 3. Utilize a collaborative process to incorporate City, School District, and community input on the design and operation of transportation facilities and traffic concerns. 4. Comply with the conditions set forth in the MOU and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the North School EIR. 5. Can be completed by March 31, 2020, including adoption of plan by both the School Board and City Council. 2 history NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 7 NORTH SCHOOL SITE HISTORY Historical maps show the project site developed as early as 1912. Two residential dwellings, including one that operated as a Baptist church, were on the western portion of the property. The dwellings eventually moved away as the school expanded. The main school building on 25th Street was constructed in 1924 after the City of Hermosa Beach passed a bond measure to build new grammar schools. In 1933, an earthquake with an epicenter in Long Beach damaged the building. Although the school reopened eight days after the earthquake, the building was restored in 1934. Two new buildings (kindergarten building and classroom building) were constructed in 1938/1939 with federal money under the New Deal Program. In 1958, the District constructed another kindergarten classroom and five-classroom building to house “Baby Boom” children. In the 1970s and ‘80s, the District experienced declining enrollment, and in 1984, North School was closed and leased to various public and private institutional entities until 2018. LONG RANGE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN The District completed a Long-Range Facilities Master Plan in June 2014 (2014 FMP). Based on feedback gathered from the FPAC, the 2014 FMP included four layouts to redevelop the North School site. All four options identified school parking along Morningside Drive at Gould Avenue. Option D of the 2014 FMP was selected as the preferred plan during the District’s 2014 Measure Q bond campaign. 2014 MEASURE Q BOND In 2014, the District placed Measure Q on the November 2014 ballot. Measure Q failed by 32 votes. It would have authorized the District to issue $54 million in bonds. With the loss of Measure Q, the District conducted a tracking poll and learned that the bond failed mainly because the Hermosa Beach community wanted to preserve the City’s limited open space; the community did not want the proposed school to encroach onto limited parkland. 2016 MEASURE S BOND With the information gathered from the tracking poll, the District conducted community envisioning workshops that ultimately resulted in two options to reconstruct the North School site within the former school’s general footprint. The new layouts were used as the preferred plans during the District’s June 2016 Measure S Bond. Measure S passed by 59.72 percent and includes $59 million dollars for facility improvements at all three District school sites. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PROJECT APPROVALS To comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the School District prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the North School Reconstruction Project and took action to certify the Final EIR and approve the project on January 9, 2019. Additional project approvals for certain elements of the project were required prior to construction commencing from: • California Department of Education, School Facilities and Transportation Services Division • California Department of General Services, Division of the State Architect • California Coastal Commission • Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board MOU AND NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Following certification of the Final EIR by the School Board on January 9, 2019, the City and School District representatives met as a team frequently to collaborate on the conditions to be included in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). On February 27, 2019 the Memorandum of Understanding was approved by both the City Council and School Board memorializing the commitment of both parties to work together collaboratively to safely manage transportation, traffic, and student loading and unloading activities, primarily through the development of a Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan (NTMP) for the streets and neighborhood surrounding North School. As part of the Memorandum of Understanding, the City and District agreed to form a stakeholder group that would share information and gather public input on relevant topics including: peak traffic conditions, speed, safety, sight distance, anticipated and proposed student loading, and parent or resident concerns that might deter walking and biking to school or use of certain routes to/from the project. Aerial View of North School Prior to 1933 Long Beach Earthquake NORTH SCHOOL 3 planning process NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 9 Beginning in summer 2019, the City of Hermosa Beach and Hermosa Beach City School District (HBCSD) embarked on a collaborative, iterative, and public process to develop the NTMP agreed upon in the MOU. The NTMP proactively addresses transportation issues and traffic safety around North School, focusing on safe student loading and unloading activities, and the spillover effects from those activities. Transportation planning firm, Fehr & Peers, facilitated the process and provided technical guidance throughout the process. The planning process (see Figure 3) included an evaluation of existing conditions, identification of issues and opportunities, creation of evaluation criteria to refine the recommendations and priorities, and ultimately development of the plan for review, adoption, and implementation. Each step in the process additionally involves various levels of community input and feedback to inform and refine the plan through an adaptive management program. EXISTING CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT The process was informed through the collection of new data on traffic and parking conditions in the vicinity of the school, including: daily traffic counts, identification of background traffic peaks, speed surveys, and an inventory and utilization assessment of street parking around Valley Park. Traffic Volume and Speeds Traffic counts and speed surveys were conducted on two weekdays of the same week (Tuesday, September 10 and Thursday, September 12). Traffic counts evaluated traffic volumes in 15-minute increments for a 24-hour period. Speed surveys identified the 85th percentile speed. They were collected at the following locations: • Gould St, from Morningside to Valley • Valley Drive, from Gould Avenue to 25th Street • Myrtle Avenue, from 26th Street to 25th Street • 25th Street, from Myrtle Avenue to 25th Street/Park Avenue Results from the data collection are shown in Figure 5. Parking Conditions Parking occupancy was collected on a weekday (Wednesday, September 11) during anticipated school operation hours. On-street and off-street parking occupancies were counted every half hour, between 7 AM to 2:30 PM at the following locations: • Gould Avenue, from Morningside Drive to Valley Drive (on- and off-street) • Valley Drive, from Gould Avenue to 25th Street (on-street) • Kiwanis/Rotary Club Lot (off-street) • 25th Street, Myrtle Avenue to 25th Street/Park Avenue (on- street) Safe Routes to School Survey HBCSD parents were also surveyed regarding their children’s mode of transportation to school, as well as the factors that affected their mode choice, including those factors which deter children from walking and/or biking to school. According to the 2019 Safe Routes to School survey from parents representing 340 students from Valley and View Schools, 87% of students live within one mile of school. On most days, 35% of school drop-off trips are by car, and similarly, 39% of school pick-up trips are by car. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT The process was shaped by a broad range of stakeholders, including the MOU Team, comprised of HBCSD school leadership, school board members, elected city officials, and city staff, and the Stakeholder Working Group, comprised of North School neighborhood residents, current and former HBCSD parents, and other Hermosa Beach residents who live adjacent to existing HBCSD schools. Public input to the process was solicited through two Community Workshops, as well as through social media and on the HBCSD and City websites. Throughout the process, other key stakeholders including the Hermosa Beach Police Department and the Department of Public Works. A regular series of meetings was scheduled throughout the 6-month NTMP development period. These included three meetings with the MOU Team, five meetings with the Stakeholder Working Group including one neighborhood walking tour, two Community Workshops, and working meetings with representatives from the Police Department and the Department of Public Works. Figure 3 – NTMP Planning Process Adaptive Management Program Community Engagement Existing Conditions Issues + Opportunities Evaluation Criteria Recommendations + Priorities Plan Development, Review + Adoption Plan Implementation + Monitoring 10 Hermosa Beach MOU Subcommittee The process kicked-off in July 2019 with a meeting of the full project team and members of the MOU Team. A brief site visit and walking tour of the North School neighborhood helped set the stage, and a productive first conversation led to an initial list of transportation issues and potential ideas for how to address those issues. The list of issues and ideas were mapped for ease of visual communication purposes. Community Workshops The first Community Workshop occurred at the end of October and members of the public were invited to participate. At the workshop, City and technical consultant staff introduced to attendees the idea categories and elements, then divided into small groups to allow for attendees to provide input. At the end of the workshop, a “dot” voting activity was conducted in which all attendees were able to vote their support for up to 10 of the ideas. Following the first Community Workshop, the project team synthesized all that they had heard over the course of the fall to develop an Evaluation Matrix. The Evaluation Matrix identified whether the idea had been previously studied in the North School EIR, feasibility, the type of benefits expected from each idea, whether the idea was intended for near-term implementation before the opening of North School, or for longer-term implementation at a later date depending on need and/or further technical evaluation, and whether the idea was supported by the community. In November, the Evaluation Matrix was vetted and refined through conversations with the MOU Team, the Stakeholder Working Group, the Police Department, and Public Works. Stakeholder support, feasibility, and implementation timeframe were updated where necessary, and a holistic package of improvements was agreed upon. This package of improvements was Community Workshop, held in early December. Following the second Community Workshop, a final round of refinements was conducted through one more meeting each with the MOU Team and the Stakeholder Working Group. Stakeholder Working Group Through the end of the summer and into the beginning of fall, the initial list of transportation issues and ideas were more fully developed and categorized through in-depth discussions with the MOU Team and the Stakeholder Working Group. The Working Group participated in a walking tour, with members of the group who lived in the neighborhood providing particularly informative insights as to potential transportation challenges. Following the walking tour, the Stakeholder Working Group met to identify priorities and preferences as to which would be the most effective. STAKEHOLDER WORKING GROUP IDENTIFIED PRIORITIES Through the series of stakeholder meetings between September 2019 and January 2020, the stakeholder working group came to collectively identify a set of priorities for the NTMP. These priorities are identified below and have been integrated into the recommendation and implementation of this plan. 1. Monitoring Program • Pre and post North School (NS) data collection • On-going analysis for monitoring post NS construction • Additional actions or reductions based on post construction analysis 2. Onsite Loading/Unloading at North School 3. Bus or Trolley for All Three Schools 4. Kiwanis/Rotary Parking Lot • Loading and unloading configuration for parking lot • Crossing to Greenbelt with stoplight (similar to Valley School) • Pathway to NS from parking lot 5. Alternate Drop-off and Pick-up Locations • Hermosa Avenue @ 25th Street • Gould Avenue @ Valley Drive (West of Valley Drive) • Gould Avenue @ Ardmore Drive (East of Ardmore) • Valley Drive adjacent Valley Park • Other options pending monitoring analysis 6. Pedestrian and Bike Access Improvements (Physical) • Valley/Ardmore Corridor • Widen sidewalks on “Safe Routes to School” • Optional sidewalks on 24th St., 24th Pl., and 25th St. (for those interested) 7. Pedestrian and Bike Access Improvements (Programs) • Walking School Bus • Parent/Student incentive programs for walk, bike or bus 8. Pre and Post School Child Care Programs • Spread out loading and unloading periods 9. Traffic Calming • Crosswalks, speedbumps, signage, one-way streets • Crossing Guards, Traffic Officers COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #2 4 neighborhood transportation management plan recommendations NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 11 The Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan (NTMP) was a collaborative process to identify potential traffic problems on nearby residential streets and develop recommendations to manage those concerns accordingly. As part of the process, the City and School District formed a stakeholder group of residents that provided local knowledge and input on concerns such as: projected traffic volumes, speed, safety, student drop-off/pick-up, and other topics that might impact walking and bicycling to school. Recommendations were developed throughout the public outreach process and grouped into the following categories: • Trip Reduction • Drop-off and Pick-up • Pedestrian Accessibility and Safety • Traffic Safety and Calming • Other TRIP REDUCTION Increasing the number students who walk, bike, bus, and/or carpool can decrease congestion during school drop-off/pick-up times, reduce vehicle emissions, and increase overall physical activity and emotional well-being levels. Carpool and Bus or Trolley Programs Opportunities to develop formal and informal carpool programs and provide alternative transportation options such as a bus or trolley that serves all three school sites would help to alleviate vehicular congestion around the schools during drop-off/pick-up times. Safe Routes to School Programs Safe Routes to School strives to create a safe, convenient, and enjoyable opportunity for your children to walk or bike to and from school. There have been declines in the number of children walking and biking to schools, a nationwide increase in childhood obesity, and a lack of physical activity among children. While Hermosa Beach enjoys a relatively high rate of walking and biking to school participation, by continuing to implement safe routes for children to get to school, we hope to increase participation in these programs to reduce traffic strain on local streets around the schools and throughout the city. Successful Safe Routes to School Programs incorporate what is known as the six E’s: evaluation, education, encouragement, engineering, enforcement, and equity. 1. Evaluation of the school district and areas around the school assist in getting the program started. Surveys of parents and students serve as a great tool for collecting information about reasons for driving children instead of allowing them to walk or ride bikes. Surveys also help identify attributes of the program that would appeal to the students to make it an enjoyable experience. 2. Education of students, parents, school staff, and other community members is important to provide opportunities to learn about bicycle and pedestrian safety. Educational programs can also be offered about following the rules of the road when driving, walking, or riding a bike. 3. Encouragement from special events and programs help get students, parents, city officials, and school staff members involved in Safe Routes to School. Contests and challenges, within classrooms or schoolwide, often provide incentives for walking and riding bikes to and from school. 4. Engineers are needed after collecting data from surveys. The data identifies concerns about street infrastructures, such as street designs, intersections, signage, etc. Audits or walk- abouts can be organized for parents and police officers to identify problems that children may encounter and discover the shortest and safest route to/from school. 5. Enforcement of traffic laws in the vicinity of schools from local law enforcement officers is very important for the safety of children and other pedestrians. They also assist in enforcing proper walking and bicycling behaviors. This can also be done through implementing the use of crossing guards and student safety patrols around school. 6. Equity is another important component of Safe Routes to School, with the goal of providing a safe, active, and healthy environment for all income levels, ethnicities, backgrounds, etc. in the community. Safe Routes to School wants to allow access to everyone in the hopes of creating safe and equitable opportunities for children, families, and other community members. DROP-OFF/PICK-UP Getting students safely to and from school is one of the primary goals of the NTMP. For those that are driven to school, the locations at which students are dropped off or picked up from school is a key consideration in the identification and implementation of other traffic calming and safety measures and providing a distributed range of options for parents and guardians to utilize helps to ensure no one street or area is disproportionately congested. In the NTMP process, there are three types of drop-off and pick-up locations considered: on-site, school site adjacent in the public right- of-way, and at remote locations around Valley Park. On-Site Loading and Unloading Dedicated space that occurs within the boundaries of the District- owned property to facilitate the loading and unloading of students before and after school. On-site configurations must meet California Department of Education standards to ensure student safety. School Site Adjacent Loading and Unloading Designated spaces within the public right-of-way or City streets that are directly adjacent to or adjoining with the school district property are also an opportunity facilitate student loading and unloading. At these locations that border the school site, parking restrictions would be necessary during school times to ensure the curb space is available to safely and efficiently facilitate drop-off and pick-up. Remote Drop-Off/Pick-Up and Parking With the school site located next to Valley Park, there are a number of on-street and off-street parking areas within the vicinity that could be considered formally or informally for parents to either drop-off and pick-up students or park for a short duration and walk with their students to the school site. At these locations, some adjustments or additions to parking restrictions may be necessary to facilitate their use as drop-off or pick- up locations. 12 Hermosa Beach PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITY AND SAFETY This section summarizes types of engineering treatments and operational programs that can help to improve pedestrian accessibility and safety around the school site and neighborhood. Crossing Guards Crossing guards help children safely cross the street at key locations and remind drivers of the presence of pedestrians. High-Visibility Crosswalks Crosswalks should be designed with continental markings to be more visible to approaching drivers and use high-visibility material, such as inlay tape or thermoplastic tape instead of paint. Raised Crosswalks Raised crosswalks are elevated to match the sidewalk to make pedestrians more visible to approaching vehicles. Typically located at midblock crossings, they encourage motorists to yield to pedestrians and reduce vehicle speed. Rectangular Rapid-Flash Beacons Pedestrian-activated flashing lights and additional signage enhance the visibility of marked crosswalks and alert motorists to pedestrian crossings. TRAFFIC SAFETY AND CALMING This section summarizes the types of treatments related to traffic safety and calming that that may be appropriate given the context of the streets within the study area. Centerline Striping Centerline striping can be used to delineate travel lanes on residential streets. As a neighborhood transportation management measure, they are often used on curves where vehicles tend to deviate outside of the proper lane, risking collision. Curb Extensions Curb extensions widen the sidewalk at intersections or midblock crossings to shorten the pedestrian crossing distance, to make pedestrians more visible to vehicles, and to reduce the speed of turning vehicles. One-Way Street Conversion Streets with limited right of way to accommodate on-street parking on both sides simultaneously with vehicular travel in both directions could be considered for conversion to a one-way street that would preserve limited parking, while improving the flow of travel. Red Curbs Red curbs indicate parking prohibitions on the streets within the City. They can enhance safety, especially on curved roads and near driveways, by improving sightlines for pedestrians and motorists. Speed Feedback Signs Real-time speeds are relayed to drivers and flash when speeds exceed the limit. Speed feedback signs are typically mounted on or near speed limit signs and can also be mobile units. Speed Lumps These traffic calming devices use vertical deflection to encourage motorists to travel at slower speeds. Speed lumps have cut-outs designed to allow large vehicles, such as emergency vehicles and buses, to pass with minimal slowing, while significantly slowing passenger cars and mid-size SUVs. Signage Signage that can be used as a neighborhood transportation management measure include: • ‘No left-turn’ signs (during school hours) • ‘No stopping’ signs (during school hours) • ‘One way’ signs • ‘15 mph Speed Limit’ signs (during school hours) • Four-way ‘Stop’ signs Targeted Enforcement Targeted enforcement may be used in conjunction with new neighborhood transportation management devices to help drivers become aware of the new restrictions. Depending on police department resources, the targeted enforcement may be limited in duration. Traffic Control Traffic control officers at strategic locations can help to improve the flow of vehicle traffic similar to a traffic signal. Traffic control officers are typically used in instances where traffic congestion may be present only during short time durations or certain times of day and a traffic signal is not warranted. = RRFBs Raised Crosswalk and Curb Extensions Speed lumps NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 13 OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS A series of other solutions identified through the process that aim to improve traffic flow, by offsetting the number of trips that are generated during a peak time period are identified below. Staggered Bell Schedule The North School Environmental Impact Report includes a mitigation measure for the District to stagger the bell schedule for school start and end times between grades at the school. This mitigation does not necessarily reduce the number of trips that occur, but helps to distribute the trips over a wider time period to reduce potential traffic congestion. Before and After School Programs Before and after school programming for students provides numerous benefits to both students and parents, but in the context of a neighborhood transportation management plan provides an opportunity similar to a staggered bell schedule to distribute the trips to and from the school so that they occur outside of peak drop-off or pick up times. Regular Monitoring and Evaluation Regular monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of the measures is key to the implementation and iterative process of the plan. The adaptive management program has been developed to establish parameters for ensuring the recommendations implemented are effective and whether additional measures are warranted based on data and analysis. RECOMMENDATION FRAMEWORK The recommendations were generated over the course of four stakeholder group meetings, two public workshops, and three meetings with the MOU subcommittee comprised of City Council and School Board members. The outreach process provided recommendations that would be most effective based on public feedback, alignment with the North School Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and the costs/benefits of implementation. While the input from stakeholder meetings and public workshops provided general priorities, the consultant team provided technical expertise on the type and placement of treatments. The comprehensive set of recommendations are shown Figure 4 and in the corresponding table. Following the graphic depiction of the set of recommendations, each recommendation is then described briefly and includes information on the implementation timeframe, any additional evaluation needed, planning level cost estimates, and where appropriate conceptual designs presented for the recommendation. Implementation Timeframe Recommendations are divided into near-term and long-term implementation projects described below. • NEAR-TERM PROJECTS that the City and School District will install before the school opens. • LONG-TERM PROJECTS that the City and School District will consider and plan for implementation as funding is available and as the adaptive management program monitoring warrants. Additional Evaluation Needed For long-term measures, areas of additional evaluation that may be needed are identified as follows: • REQUIRES ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS are projects that additional data must be gathered to assess and monitor whether the measure would be effective • REQUIRES PUBLIC CONSULTATION that the technical team determined are effective recommendations but will require petition of support from the residents on the affected street or block • REQUIRES AGENCY COORDINATION are projects that may require more time and coordination among agencies and other organizations for implementation Planning Cost Estimates Planning-level cost estimates are also included for both near-term and long-term projects. Estimated construction costs are based on available bid result information for similar types of project work. Bid result costs are compiled from projects from 2015 to 2019. Conceptual Designs For those projects that require engineering plans or designs prior to implementation, conceptual designs have been prepared to illustrate the general location and design of the proposed treatment or infrastructure needed. 14 Hermosa Beach NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 15 33 Encourage walking and all rolling mode options 1 Formal school loading/unloading along 25th St in front of school 4 Crossing guard - 25th St & Myrtle Av 3 Add pork-chop island at school driveway to restrict eastbound left-turn traffic from 25th St into school 37 Staggered Bell Schedule 34 Walking school bus on Valley Dr with enhanced stops - School to manage organization of parent volunteers 2 On-site school loading/unloading & ADA drop-off/pick-up 5 High visibility crosswalks - 25th St & Myrtle Av (E/S/W legs)8 Speed lump - midway along Myrtle Av 38 Before and After School Programs 17 Prohibit drop-off/pick-up on Morningside Av (signage)6 High visibility crosswalk - 25th St & Manhattan Av (E/W legs)9 Speed lump - midway along Silverstrand Av 39 Regularly scheduled re-evaluation of NTMP effectiveness - Built-in monitoring to evaluate NTMP 22 Gould Av on-street parking - Allocate 8 spaces for school short-term parking during school hours 7 High visibility crosswalk with stop signs - 24th St & Manhattan Av (N/S legs)10 Yellow centerline striping along 25th St/Park Ave (from Manhattan Ave to 24th St) 26 Valley Dr On-Street Spaces - Allocate 8 spaces for school short-term parking during school hours 12 High visibility crosswalk - 25th St & 25th St (E leg)11 Speed lump - 25th St 15 High visibility crosswalk - 24th Pl & 25th St/Park Av (E leg)13 Red curb - east side of 25th St/Park/24th Pl 21 Crossing guard - Morningside Ave/27th St/Gould Av 14 Speed lump - 24th Pl & 25th St/Park Av 23 Crossing guard - Gould Av/Valley Dr/ Ardmore Av 16 Speed lump - Park Av 29 High visibility crosswalk - Valley Dr & 25th St (W leg)18 One way street heading westbound for 26th St 31 High visibility crosswalk - Valley Dr & 24th St (W leg)19 “Stop Ahead” roadway marking - 26th St heading east towards school 20 15 mph speed limit around school (only during school hours) 24 Traffic control officer at Gould Av/Valley Dr/Ardmore Av 25 15 mph speed limit on Valley Dr (only during school hours) 27 Red curb - west side of Valley Dr, just north of Kiwanis Club (eliminates 2 on-street parking spaces) 28 Curb extension - Valley Dr & 25th St 30 No left-turn restriction from Valley Dr onto 25th St (only during school drop-off/pick-up hours) 32 No left-turn restriction from Valley Dr onto 24th Pl (only during school drop-off/pick-up hours) 35 Targeted traffic enforcement during school drop-off/pick-up times (when school opens) 36 Develop suggested parent travel route maps for entrance/exit to/from neighborhood NEAR-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS Trip Reduction Drop-Off/Pick-Up Around School Site Pedestrian Accessibility & Safety Traffic Safety and Calming Other 16 Hermosa Beach K Busing for all 3 schools (Valley, View & North)A Kiwanis/Rotary Club Lot - Redesign existing parking layout for formal use as drop- off/pick-up area B Pedestrian path across park from Kiwanis Club (with school monitor/volunteer)F Red curb - both sides of 25th St (diagonal segment) @ 25th St/Park Av I Gould Av on-street parking - Look into drop- off/pick-up options east of Gould Av/Ardmore Av C High visibility midblock crosswalk - across Valley Dr, in front of Kiwanis/Rotary Club Lot, with HAWK (High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk) beacon or traffic signal H Signalize Gould Av/Valley Dr/Ardmore Av (similar to 15th St/Valley Dr/Ardmore Av in Manhattan Beach) J Hermosa Av on-street parking - Use time restrictions to make available 4-5 drop- off/pick-up spaces D Pedestrian path across greenbelt to connect Kiwanis Club to greenbelt E Traffic control officer at Gould Av/Valley Dr or in front of Kiwanis Lot G Crossing guard - 25th St/Park/24th Pl L Raised midblock crosswalk with recentangular rapid-flash beacons with appropriate signage and markings)- 25th St in front of school main entrance LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS Trip Reduction Drop-Off/Pick-Up Around School Site Pedestrian Accessibility & Safety Traffic Safety and Calming Other NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 17 NEAR-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations have been identified to be implemented in the near-term, prior to the opening of North School. 1. FORMAL SCHOOL DROP-OFF/PICK-UP ALONG 25TH ST IN FRONT OF SCHOOL Description At the front of the school site, a street widening/curb cutout is proposed along 25th Street stretching approximately 200 feet to serve as a school drop-off and pick-up location directly adjacent to the main entrance of the school. This space is intended to accommodate approximately 9 vehicles at a time. A school valet program will also be implemented to assist in the efficiency of the drop-off/pick-up process. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: Included in school construction project contract Conceptual Designs: See Appendix A 2. ON-SITE SCHOOL & ADA DROP-OFF/PICK-UP Description On-site school parking lot was re-designed by the School District with help from project neighbors, the transportation consulting team, and stakeholder to revise the configuration to introduce on- site drop-off/pick-up while still complying with accessibility standards under the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) and California Division of the State Architect standards, while maintain the 41 on-site parking spaces approved by the California Coastal Commission. The on-site loading and unloading area is designed to accommodate approximately 4 vehicles at a time. A school valet program will also be implemented to assist in the efficiency of the drop-off/pick-up process. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 15,000 for design Conceptual Designs: See Appendix A 3. ADD PORK-CHOP ISLAND AT SCHOOL DRIVEWAY Description To restrict eastbound left-turn traffic from 25th Street into the school parking lot and left-turn traffic from the school parking lot back onto 25th Street, concrete “pork chop” island is recommended for installation to prohibit those turning movements. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 1,100 Conceptual Designs: See Appendix A 4. CROSSING GUARD - 25TH ST & MYRTLE AV Description Crossing guards help children safely cross the street at key locations and remind drivers of the presence of pedestrians. A crossing guard is recommended for the intersection of 25th Street and Myrtle Avenue. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $10,900 per year 5. HIGH-VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS - 25TH ST & MYRTLE AV Description Crosswalks should be designed with continental markings to be more visible to approaching drivers and use high-visibility material, such as inlay tape or thermoplastic tape instead of paint. High- visibility crosswalk markings are recommended at the intersection 25th Street and Myrtle Avenue on the east, south and west legs. In addition to striping, reconstruction of the intersection corners would be needed to mitigate the downslope, as well as installation of new directional ramps for each crosswalk and potential drainage changes. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 40,400 18 Hermosa Beach 6. HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK - 25TH ST & MANHATTAN AV Description Crosswalks should be designed with continental markings to be more visible to approaching drivers and use high-visibility material, such as inlay tape or thermoplastic tape instead of paint. High- visibility crosswalk markings are recommended at the intersection 25th Street and Manhattan Avenue on the east and west legs. In addition to striping, reconstruction of the intersection corners would be needed to mitigate the downslope, as well as installation of new directional ramps for each crosswalk and potential drainage changes. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 39,300 7. HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK WITH STOP SIGNS - 24TH ST & MANHATTAN AV Description Crosswalks should be designed with continental markings to be more visible to approaching drivers and use high-visibility material, such as inlay tape or thermoplastic tape instead of paint. High- visibility crosswalk markings are recommended at the intersection 24th Street and Manhattan Avenue on the north and south legs. In addition to striping, reconstruction of the intersection corners would be needed to mitigate the downslope, as well as installation of new directional ramps for each crosswalk and potential drainage changes. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 35,100 8. SPEED LUMP - MIDWAY ALONG MYRTLE AV Description Speed lumps use vertical deflection to encourage motorists to travel at slower speeds. Speed lumps have cut-outs designed to allow large vehicles, such as emergency vehicles and buses, to pass with minimal slowing, while significantly slowing passenger cars and mid-size SUVs. Speed lumps are recommended for installation along Myrtle Avenue midway between 24th Street and 25th Street. This recommendation will require a petition of support from the residents on the affected street. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 3,300 9. SPEED LUMP - MIDWAY ALONG SILVERSTRAND AV Description Speed lumps use vertical deflection to encourage motorists to travel at slower speeds. Speed lumps have cut-outs designed to allow large vehicles, such as emergency vehicles and buses, to pass with minimal slowing, while significantly slowing passenger cars and mid-size SUVs. Speed lumps are recommended for installation along Silverstrand Avenue midway between 24th Street and 25th Street. This recommendation will require a petition of support from the residents on the affected street. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 3,300 10. YELLOW CENTERLINE STRIPING ALONG 25TH ST/PARK AVE Description Centerline striping can be used to delineate travel lanes on residential streets. As a neighborhood transportation management measure, they are often used on curves where vehicles tend to deviate outside of the proper lane, risking collision. Centerline striping is recommended for installation along 25th Street and Park Avenue between Manhattan Avenue and 24th Street due to the curvature of the road and limited roadway width. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 400 11. SPEED LUMP - 25TH ST Description Speed lumps use vertical deflection to encourage motorists to travel at slower speeds. Speed lumps have cut-outs designed to allow large vehicles, such as emergency vehicles and buses, to pass with minimal slowing, while significantly slowing passenger cars and mid-size SUVs. Speed lumps are recommended for installation along 25th Street north of the intersection with 24th Place and Park Avenue. This recommendation will require a petition of support from the residents on the affected street. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 3,300 12. HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK - 25TH ST & PARK AV Description Crosswalks should be designed with continental markings to be more visible to approaching drivers and use high-visibility material, such as inlay tape or thermoplastic tape instead of paint. High- visibility crosswalk markings are recommended at the intersection 25th Street where it intersects with Park Avenue on the east leg. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 4,800 NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 19 13. RED CURB - EAST SIDE OF 25TH ST/PARK/24TH PL Description A red curb is proposed on the east side of the intersection between 25th Street, Park Avenue and 24th Place due to the curved roadways, unusual intersection geometry, and sloped nature of the roadway approaches to improve sightlines for pedestrians and motorists. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 210 14. SPEED LUMP - 24TH PL & 25TH ST/PARK AV Description Speed lumps use vertical deflection to encourage motorists to travel at slower speeds. Speed lumps have cut-outs designed to allow large vehicles, such as emergency vehicles and buses, to pass with minimal slowing, while significantly slowing passenger cars and mid-size SUVs. Speed lumps are recommended for installation along 25th Street at the intersection with 24th Place and Park Avenue. This recommendation will require a petition of support from the residents on the affected street. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 3,300 15. HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK - 24TH PL/25TH ST/PARK AV Description Crosswalks should be designed with continental markings to be more visible to approaching drivers and use high-visibility material, such as inlay tape or thermoplastic tape instead of paint. High- visibility crosswalk markings are recommended at the intersection 24th Place where it intersects with Park Avenue on the east leg. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 11,900 16. SPEED LUMP - PARK AV Description Speed lumps use vertical deflection to encourage motorists to travel at slower speeds. Speed lumps have cut-outs designed to allow large vehicles, such as emergency vehicles and buses, to pass with minimal slowing, while significantly slowing passenger cars and mid-size SUVs. Speed lumps are recommended for installation along Park Avenue south of the intersection with 24th Place and 25th Street. This recommendation will require a petition of support from the residents on the affected street. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 3,500 17. PROHIBIT DROP-OFF/PICK-UP ON MORNINGSIDE DR Description The southern segment of Morningside Drive which is accessed from 25th Street is a narrow dead-end street without space for proper vehicle turning. To avoid the use of that location as a drop-off or pick-up spot for students, signage will be installed that prohibits drop-off activity at the intersection of the street with 25th Street. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 1,900 18. ONE WAY STREET HEADING WESTBOUND FOR 26TH ST Description This roadway is very narrow, and with added traffic volume from the school, it will be very difficult to function as two-way with parking on both sides of the street. Converting to one-way would allow parking on both sides with sufficient space for reasonable vehicle circulation. Two-way access would be maintained on Morningside Drive, between Gould Avenue and 26th Street, to preserve alley access. Conversion of 26th Street to one-way will require a petition of support from the residents on the affected street. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 4,200 19. “STOP AHEAD” ROADWAY MARKING - 26TH ST HEADING WEST TOWARDS MANHATTAN AV Description Roadway markings such as ‘stop ahead’ are intended to warn drivers of an upcoming change to the roadway conditions. This type of roadway marking is recommended for installation along 26th Street as drivers approach the intersection with Manhattan Avenue. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 300 20 Hermosa Beach 20. SCHOOL ZONE SPEED LIMITS Description A reduction in the maximum speed limit is recommended for implementation along Valley Drive from Gould Avenue to 21st Street through designation as a School Zone speed limit, as allowed under the California Vehicle Code. The lower speed limit of 15 MPH would be limited to enforcement during school hours. Real-time speeds can be relayed to drivers and flash when speeds exceed the limit through the installation of speed feedback signs. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 4,500 21. CROSSING GUARD - MORNINGSIDE DR/27TH ST Description Crossing guards help children safely cross the street at key locations and remind drivers of the presence of pedestrians. A crossing guard is recommended for the intersection of Morningside Drive and 27th St adjacent to Valley Park. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $10,900 per year 22. GOULD AVE ON-STREET PARKING Description Designate a portion of the spaces (approximately 8 spaces) as 15- minute parking zones 30 minutes before and after school intake and dismissal. This parking is currently unrestricted and typically used by park-goers during the daytime and adjacent residents overnight. During the beginning and ending of school, these spaces are not heavily subscribed. Therefore, making them available for school-related drop-off/pick-up will benefit the neighborhood by not requiring these parents to drive on the smaller residential streets adjacent to the school. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 3,700 23. CROSSING GUARD - GOULD AV/VALLEY DR/ ARDMORE AV Description Crossing guards help children safely cross the street at key locations and remind drivers of the presence of pedestrians. A minimum of two crossing guards are recommended for the intersections of Gould Avenue where it intersects with Valley Drive and Ardmore Avenue. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $10,900 per year 24. TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER AT GOULD AV/VALLEY DR/ARDMORE AV Description Traffic control officers at strategic locations can help to improve the flow of vehicle traffic similar to a traffic signal. Traffic control officers are typically used in instances where traffic congestion may be present only during short time durations or certain times of day. In conjunction with crossing guards, a traffic control officer is recommended for the intersections of Gould Avenue where it intersects with Valley Drive and Ardmore Avenue. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $14,200 per year 25. 15 MPH SPEED LIMIT ON VALLEY DR (ONLY DURING SCHOOL HOURS) Description A reduction in the maximum speed limit is recommended for implementation along Valley Drive from Gould Avenue to 21st Street through designation as a School Zone speed limit, as allowed under the California Vehicle Code. The lower speed limit of 15 MPH would be limited to enforcement during school hours. Real-time speeds can be relayed to drivers and flash when speeds exceed the limit through the installation of speed feedback signs. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 4,500 26. VALLEY DR ON-STREET SPACES Description Designate a portion of the spaces (approximately 8 spaces) as 15- minute parking zones 30 minutes before and after school intake and dismissal. This parking along Valley Drive currently has 6-hour time restrictions and typically used by park-goers during the daytime. During the beginning and ending of school, these spaces are not heavily subscribed. Therefore, making them available for school-related drop-off/pick-up will benefit the neighborhood by not requiring these parents to drive on the smaller residential streets adjacent to the school. Throughout the outreach process, the nearby Kiwanis/Rotary Club lot was identified as a potential asset for off-site drop-off/pick-up during school hours. The lot was considered for school-related drop-off/pick-up, but is not feasible in the short-term as it will require approval from the California Coastal Commission and additional capital improvement program funding to build out an ADA-compliant pedestrian path across Valley Park. The City and District have identified other nearby locations, including the on-street spaces along Valley Drive for drop-off/pick- up that are less costly, giving more time to accumulate the funds and pursue the approvals needed for to formally utilize the Kiwanis/Rotary Club lot in the future. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 3,700 27. RED CURB - WEST SIDE OF VALLEY DR, JUST NORTH OF KIWANIS CLUB (ELIMINATES 2 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES) Description A red curb is proposed on the west side of Valley Drive, just north of the Kiwanis/Rotary Club parking lot. This red curb would result in the elimination or adjustment of two on-street parking spaces, but would improve visibility reduce conflicts between vehicles along Valley Drive and those exiting the parking lot. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 140 NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 21 28. CURB EXTENSION - VALLEY DR & 25TH ST Description A curb extension is proposed on the northwest corner of the intersection between 25th Street and Valley Drive to address pedestrian visibility, slope change, and vehicle speed concerns as southbound motorists turn from Valley Drive on to 25th Street. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 11,400 29. HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK - VALLEY DR & 25TH ST Description Crosswalks should be designed with continental markings to be more visible to approaching drivers and use high-visibility material, such as inlay tape or thermoplastic tape instead of paint. High- visibility crosswalk markings are recommended at the intersection 25th Street and Valley Drive on the west leg. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 1,050 30. NO LEFT-TURN RESTRICTION FROM VALLEY DR ONTO 25TH ST (ONLY DURING SCHOOL DROP-OFF/PICK-UP HOURS) Description Northbound left turn movements from Valley Drive onto 25th Street by vehicles attempting to access the school site have the potential to increase the volume of traffic on this street, interfere with pedestrian crossings, and delay northbound traffic on Valley Drive. Signage is proposed at this intersection to prohibit left-hand turns during school hours to address these concerns. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 465 31. HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK - VALLEY DR & 24TH PL Description Crosswalks should be designed with continental markings to be more visible to approaching drivers and use high-visibility material, such as inlay tape or thermoplastic tape instead of paint. High- visibility crosswalk markings are recommended at the intersection 24th Place and Valley Drive on the west leg. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 1,050 32. NO LEFT-TURN RESTRICTION FROM VALLEY DR ONTO 24TH PL (ONLY DURING SCHOOL DROP-OFF/PICK-UP HOURS) Description Northbound left turn movements from Valley Drive onto 24th Place by vehicles attempting to access the school site have the potential to increase the volume of traffic on this street, interfere with pedestrian crossings, and delay northbound traffic on Valley Drive. Signage is proposed at this intersection to prohibit left-hand turns during school hours to address these concerns. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: $ 465 33. ENCOURAGE WALKING AND ALL ROLLING MODE OPTIONS Description The District will encourage and support all non-auto transportation modes, including walking, biking, skateboarding, scootering, and others, through a combination of ongoing education, encouragement, and incentives. This encouragement applies to all students who utilize non-auto modes to school, not just those participating in the Walking School Bus program (see # 35, below). Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: Minimal infrastructure development costs, costs primarily related to labor. 34. WALKING SCHOOL BUS ON VALLEY DR WITH ENHANCED STOPS Description HBCSD’s existing Walking School Bus program utilizes trained adult volunteers, usually parents, to safely walk students to school along a designated Safe Route To School, with coordinated stops to allow additional students to “get on the bus” along the way. Due to the program’s voluntary nature, both in terms of the adults who supervise the walk and students participants, participation varies from school year to school year. To ensure sustained high levels of participation in the North School Walking School Bus program, appropriate incentives will be determined and offered to participants. Routes will be adjusted annually to best serve student home origin locations. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: Minimal infrastructure development costs, costs primarily related to labor. 35. TARGETED TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT DURING SCHOOL DROP- OFF/PICK-UP TIMES Description Targeted enforcement will be used as resources are available to focus safe travel behaviors by vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. Key times in which targeted enforcement may be used include: when new neighborhood transportation management devices to help drivers become aware of the new restrictions; when school schedules change or reset (back to school, school breaks); and as concerns arise regarding unsafe travel behaviors that can be reduced through traffic enforcement. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: Minimal infrastructure development costs, costs primarily related to labor. 22 Hermosa Beach 36. DEVELOP SUGGESTED PARENT TRAVEL ROUTE MAPS FOR ENTRANCE/EXIT TO/FROM NEIGHBORHOOD Description A school route map can inform parents of students about suggested driving routes to and from school depending on where they live. While the suggested driving routes are intended to make the school trips safer by identifying optimal routes, the map also identifies alternate drop-off/pick-up locations to mitigate traffic congestion around the school during peak hours and encourage more students to walk to/from school. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: Minimal infrastructure development costs, costs primarily related to labor. 37. STAGGERED BELL SCHEDULE Description The North School Environmental Impact Report includes a mitigation measure for the District to stagger the bell schedule for school start and end times between grades at the school. This mitigation does not necessarily reduce the number of trips that occur, but helps to distribute the trips over a wider time period to reduce potential traffic congestion. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: Minimal infrastructure development costs, costs primarily related to labor. 38. BEFORE AND AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS Description Before and after school programming for students provides numerous benefits to both students and parents, but in the context of a neighborhood Transportation management plan provides an opportunity similar to a staggered bell schedule to distribute the trips to and from the school so that they occur outside of peak drop-off or pick up times. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: Minimal infrastructure development costs, costs primarily related to labor. 39. REGULARLY SCHEDULED RE-EVALUATION OF NTMP EFFECTIVENESS (I.E. BUILT-IN MONITORING TO EVALUATE TRAFFIC VOLUMES) Description Regular monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of the measures is key to the implementation and iterative process of the plan. The adaptive management program has been developed to establish parameters for ensuring the recommendations implemented are effective and whether additional measures are warranted based on data and analysis. The City and School District proposed approach to regular monitoring and evaluation is described in the adaptive management program chapter of this document. Implementation Timeframe: Near-Term Planning Cost Estimates: Minimal infrastructure development costs, costs primarily related to labor. 5 implementation NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 23 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES As noted in the recommendations, each project will require funding to implement. While many of the smaller cost and short-term projects may be implemented using existing funding resources, other projects will require the City and School District to consider and apply for outside funding resources from federal, state, local, and even private granting agencies. The range of resources available are described in this chapter. FEDERAL FUNDING Safe Routes to School Program (SRTS) http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/localprograms/saferoutes/srts.htm Cycle 3 of the Federal Safe Routes to School program has been extended after the success of California’s Safe Routes to School (SR2S) program which began in 1999. Originally a five year program, extensions through continuing resolution have been enacted by Congress allowing the program to remain funded for the purpose of: 1) enabling and encouraging students in kindergarten through eighth grade (K-8), including students with disabilities, to safely walk and bicycle to school, 2) making walking and bicycling to school a more appealing mode choice, and 3) facilitating the planning, design, and implementation of projects that will improve safety, environment, and overall quality of life. Consistent with other federal-aid programs, each State Department of Transportation is held responsible for developing and implementing the program. Transportation Enhancement Activities www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/transportation_enhancements The Transportation Enhancement (TE) activities offered funding opportunities to help expand transportation choices and enhance the transportation experience through 12 eligible TE activities related to surface transportation, including pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and safety programs, scenic and historic highway programs, landscaping and scenic beautification, historic preservation, and environmental mitigation. STATE FUNDING SOURCES Active Transportation Program (ATP) https://catc.ca.gov/programs/active-transportation-program The California Transportation Commission developed program guidelines and project selection criteria for the first call for projects for the statewide Active Transportation Program (ATP) in March 2014. The ATP consolidates existing federal and state transportation programs, including the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA), and State Safe Routes to School (SR2S), into a single program with a focus to make California a national leader in active transportation. A fourth cycle of the ATP is anticipated in 2019 and expected to last through 2023. The purpose of ATP is to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation by achieving Increase the proportion of trips accomplished by biking and walking, Increased safety and mobility for non-motorized users, advance the active transportation efforts of regional agencies to achieve greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals, enhance public health, ensure that disadvantaged communities fully share in the benefits of the program, and provide a broad spectrum of projects to benefit many types of active transportation users. In addition, the Senate Bill 1 (SB1) transportation bill funds an additional $1 billion for the Active Transportation Program (ATP) over the next ten years —that’s an additional $100 million per year for cities, counties and regional transportation agencies to build more bike paths, cross- walks and sidewalks. The Safe Routes to School (SR2S) grants are awarded through the ATP, listed below: Safe Routes to School (SR25) SR2S is administered by Caltrans, and funds engineering and education projects that improve safety to/from schools. Authorized by Section 1404 of SAFETEA-LU (the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users), the SRTS Program came into effect in August of 2005. This federal funding program emphasizes community collaboration in the development of projects, and projects that incorporate elements of – education, encouragement, engineering, enforcement, and evaluation. Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program www.resources.ca.gov/grants/environmental-enhancement-and- mitigation-eem The Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (EEMP) was established in 1989 and is administered by the California Natural Resources Agency and Caltrans. The program offers a total of $7 million each year for grants to local, state, and federal governmental agencies and to nonprofit organizations, funded through gasoline taxes. EEMP Funds are allocated to projects that either directly or indirectly offset environmental impacts of modified or new public transportation facilities including streets, mass transit guideways, park- n-ride facilities, transit stations, tree planting to offset the effects of vehicular emissions, and the acquisition or development of roadside recreational facilities, such as trails. EEMP is an annual program with the next solicitation expected in April of 2019. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hsip.htm The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core federal-aid program that aims to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roads. HSIP funds can be used for projects such as bike lane or sidewalk projects on local roadways, improvements to Class I multi-use paths, or for traffic calming measures. Applications that identify a history of incidents and demonstrate their project’s improvement to safety are most competitive for funding. Program is administered by Caltrans in the State of California. California Office of Traffic Safety Grant Opportunities www.ots.ca.gov/Grants/default.asp The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) provides grants for safety programs and equipment. Drivers of motor vehicles need to share the road with pedestrians and bicyclists. OTS grantees develop programs to increase awareness of traffic rules, rights, and responsibilities among various age groups. Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety is a specifically identified funding priority. This category of grants includes enforcement and education programs, which encompass a wide range of activities, including bicycle helmet distribution, design and printing of billboards and bus posters, other public information materials, development of safety components as part of physical education curriculum, or police safety demonstrations through school visitations. 24 Hermosa Beach REGIONAL AND LOCAL FUNDING SOURCES At the regional and county level, SCAG and Metro administer much of the funds that can be used to implement active transportation projects. Metro administers several programs that are sources of funding for recommended projects. SCAG Grant Opportunities http://www.scag.ca.gov/opportunities/Pages/Grants.aspx The Southern California Association of Governments’ Grant opportunities offered by various agencies that may be pertinent to your agency’s workplan. SCAG gathers this information in order to disseminate it to all interested agencies in the SCAG region. Measure M http://theplan.metro.net/ The Measure M Expenditure Plan devotes its funds to nine transportation categories as follows: 35% to new rail and bus rapid transit construction, 17% highway/Carpool lane/Goods movement improvements, 20% Bus operations, 17% to local city transportation improvements, 5% to Metro Rail system improvements, 2% for state of good repair, 2% to keep fares affordable for seniors, students and disabled, 2% for active transportation projects, 1% for Metrolink projects. Many jurisdictions use their local Measure M funding for active transportation projects and local transportation improvements. Air Quality Improvements through Automobile Trip Reduction & Roadway Congestion Mitigation http://www.scag.ca.gov/opportunities/Pages/Grants.aspx The AQMD announces the availability to local governments of up to $5 million in grant funds for opportunities to reduce automobile trips, traffic congestion, and their associated air pollutant emissions by shifting attendees of major event center functions out of their personal automobile and onto public transportation. Traffic Mitigation Fees Some agencies have implemented development fees that can then be used to fund various types of infrastructure. For example, a fee may be adopted for each PM peak hour trip that is generated by a project. This funding is combined with funds from other projects to establish a source of funds to construct the improvements that are on an adopted project list. Based on the list of projects or other mechanisms, the traffic mitigation program can be used to fund a variety of projects that serve several travel modes. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Each year, the City allocates a portion of the general fund budget to transportation capital projects, including pedestrian-related facilities, street lighting, and traffic calming. This is typically the largest source of funds for existing communities. This is typically the largest source of funds for existing communities. While sidewalk repair and replacement are usually the responsibility of the adjacent land owner, the City is responsible for the repair of sidewalk damage caused by City-owned trees, vehicle crashes, water main breaks and natural subsidence. The majority of CIP funds, however, are for new installations associated with city streets, buildings and other infrastructure. Community Development Block Program (CDBG) CDBG Partners with rural cities and counties to improve the lives of their low- and moderate-income residents through the creation and expansion of community and economic development opportunities in support of livable communities. The CDBG program is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and through expanding economic opportunities, principally, for persons of low- and moderate-income. “Persons of low and moderate income” are defined as families, households, and individuals whose incomes do not exceed 80 percent of the county median income, adjusted for family or household size. Beach Cities Health District Beach Cities Health District offers two types of grants: our Grants for Non-Profits and our Micro Enrichment Grants for small, one-time health projects. The District funds programs that provide: • Health education and prevention • Support groups • Health promotion • Health maintenance • Efforts to develop and test new approaches to solving problems within the health field • Safety net programs for vulnerable and underserved populations (e.g., senior and homeless meal program) PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS Increasingly, innovative bicycle projects are being implemented with the assistance and funding from private entities. Examples of local projects include the provision of shared bicycles at hotels, the construction of shower and changing facilities in office buildings, and the development of bicycle storage rooms at new residential development sites. The National Institutes of Health The National Institutes of Health funds projects that “study primary and secondary prevention approaches targeting environmental factors that contribute to inappropriate weight gain in children, adolescents, and adults.” Applications may be submitted by for-profit and non- profit organizations (e.g., universities, colleges, hospitals, laboratories, units of state and local governments, and eligible agencies of the federal government). Approximately 4,000,000 dollars are committed to fund successful applications and NIH anticipates making 5 to 12 awards. The application guidelines that apply to pedestrian and bicycle programs are listed below: • Promoting walking or bicycling to school or to worksites • Increasing physical activity during, before, and after school care • Decreasing sedentary behaviors in children and adolescents • Promoting physical activity at worksites • Increasing family participation in physical activity NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 25 COST SHARING APPROACH This section specifies the financial arrangement between the Hermosa Beach School District and the City of Hermosa Beach in service of implementing the NTMP project, which considers operational and physical improvements on the school site and its adjacent public right- of-way. The physical improvements of the School District might include curb extensions, gateways, speed humps, crosswalks, lane reconfiguration, new traffic signals, site access, and tiered pick up/drop off zones. The infrastructure and operational components would be identified and evaluated after analyzing the existing and future conditions of the area, and establishing the objectives in terms of traffic management, safety, and health. Also, the District will require to develop a construction work site traffic control plan in accordance to the Mitigation TRAF-3, and must restrict equipment and construction vehicles from parking in from local streets once the construction begins, as stated in TRAF-4. Both parties would have financial responsibilities throughout the development of the project, for the planning, design, and implementation, to the on-going operational requirements and updates to the initial plan. Their level of participation will depend on their jurisdiction and defined geographical limits as it follows: • The School District is responsible for 50% of the planning and designing costs of the NTMP, and any future updates applied to the plan. Consequently, The District will pay 100% of the implementation cost of the portion of the project set within the school limits (on-site), which includes the site access and the adjacent right-of-way. All proposals for construction must first be submitted and approved by the Hermosa Beach Public Works Department; the District will assume the total cost of the fees related to such process. If any of the planned interventions, within and out of the School District limits, has a negative impact on Level of Service, the District will cover a proportional cost calculated in the planning process and based on the projects attributable increase in vehicle activity relative to existing or future vehicle activity, to help fund the projects identified. Similarly, if on-going operational support is needed during, and after the construction of the project (e.g. traffic control officers or devices), the District can request support from the City Council. However, this might entail an additional partial cost (50% of the total) for the District, as the NTMP may require an update. • The City is responsible for 50% of the planning and designing cost of the NTMP, and any future updates applied to the plan. Consequently, the City will pay for the total cost of the physical and operational interventions in the public right-of-way adjacent to the School District limits, with the exemption of the proportional cost attributable to the school, based on project generated traffic. If the project is provided with on-going operational support and/or traffic control devices during, and after the construction of the project by the City Council, the City will pay for 50% of the costs required to update the NTMP. COST SHARING BETWEEN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE CITY BREAK DOWN Cost-sharing allocations were derived from the MOU: As established in the MOU dated February 27, 2019, any costs associated with the recommendations of the NTMP that entail construction of physical improvements or implementation of traffic control devices will be assigned a proportional cost to the District relative to the level of service (LOS) impact or increased volume of traffic that would otherwise be generated by the project. PHASE THE DISTRICT THE CITY PLANNING AND DESIGN 50% 50% IMPLEMENTATION ON-SITE 100% SCHOOL SITE ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY 100% PUBLIC RIGHT-OF- WAY* 100% PLAN UPDATES + MONITORING 50% 50% 6 adaptive management program NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 27 Local traffic conditions are, by nature, fluid due to random fluctuations (from individual choices), economic conditions, technology changes, and local land development. In the case of the North School, conditions will also vary based upon enrollment and the grades being accommodated at the school. Beyond the fluid traffic conditions, estimating the success of traffic management measures is an in-exact science. The consultant team advising on this effort have used their knowledge of similar treatments at other schools, but the context of every school is different. In this case, Hermosa Beach uses a citywide approach to grade levels, which is not common to other communities. DATA COLLECTION PARAMETERS Given the uncertainty described above, it is appropriate to monitor conditions and adjust the NTMP from time to time. Moreover, some potential treatments have been identified as “long-term” due to questions about their efficacy, difficulty of implementation, or potential negative side-effects. Monitoring will help determine when/whether long-term measures are implemented. The following parameters for data collection are recommended to maximize opportunities to compare data: • Frequency: monitoring should be conducted annually for the at least the first five years after the school is reopened. • Schedule: during the school year on days when school is in session. • Duration: for a three-day period (Tues-Thurs) that is representative of an average school week (i.e. no holidays, minimum days, atypical weather conditions) DATA TO BE COLLECTED Figure 5 provides base-level data with respect to traffic volume and speed, but some additional “pre” data should be collected to fill all the categories described below: • Enrollment Numbers and Grades at School will be an essential foundation to understanding other data collected and providing a point of comparison from year to year. • Walk and Bike to School Participation Rates using the sample safe routes to school survey provided in the appendices will assist in evaluating effectiveness of programs implemented. • Traffic Collision Reports prepared by the Police Department or School Officials will be reviewed to understand patterns and primary collision factors that may be involved and identify opportunities to reduce instances of traffic collisions by addressing primary factors (speed, visibility, distraction, etc) • Traffic Volume and Speeds collected hourly and in two- directions on: o Manhattan Avenue (both north and south of 25th Street) o Gould Avenue (adjacent to park) o Valley Drive (adjacent to park) o 27th Court (between Morningside Drive and Ozone Court) o Ozone Court (between 24th Street and 27th Street) o 26th Street (between Manhattan Avenue and Morningside Drive) o 25th Street (between Manhattan Avenue and Park Avenue) o 25th Street (between 25th Street/Park Avenue to Valley Drive) o 24th Place o 24th Street (between Park Avenue and Valley Drive, and from Park Avenue to Manhattan Avenue) o Silverstrand Avenue o Myrtle Avenue (between 24th Street to 26th Street) o Park Avenue (between 25th Street and Monterey Boulevard) Existing traffic volumes from the 2018 North School Reconstruction Environmental Impact Report (EIR) included 2016 traffic volumes, as well as projected 2019 volumes with and without the opening of North School. As a point of reference for future volume counts, the table in Appendix B compares the volumes from the EIR with the 2019 volumes that were recorded as part of the NTMP. • Parking Occupancy collected hourly from 7 AM to 4 PM at: o off-street parking on the school site parking lot o off-street on Gould Avenue at park (perpendicular spaces) o Kiwanis/Rotary Club lot o on-street on Gould Avenue at park (parallel spaces) o on-street on Valley Drive along park o 27th Street (between Manhattan Avenue and Morningside Drive) o 26th Street (between Manhattan Avenue and Morningside Drive) o Morningside Drive (between 26th Street and 27th Street, and north of 25th Street) o Myrtle Avenue (between 26th Street and 24th Street) o Silverstrand Avenue o 25th Street/Park Avenue (Manhattan Avenue to 24th Street) o Park Avenue (between 24th Street and Monterey Boulevard) o 25th Street (between 25th Street/Park Avenue to Valley Drive) o 24th Place o Ozone Court (between 24th Street to 26th Street) • Queuing noted the extent and duration of vehicle queues on the streets bordering the school Figure 6 shows the location of the suggested data collection points as described above. ANNUAL REVIEW PROCESS After the annual monitoring is completed, the City and School District will summarize the results and compare to both the baseline data and any prior years (post 2020). The results will be published on both the City and School District websites and then discussed with the stakeholder group that was formed to advise on the NTMP. Given there are no absolute standards for traffic volume, speed, and parking, it is the opinion of the community that will shape any modifications to the NTMP. Any modifications developed to the NTMP, because of the annual monitoring program, will be brought to both the School District Board and City Council for consideration. 28 Hermosa Beach appendices NORTH SCHOOL Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan 29 APPENDIX A 25th Street 30 Hermosa Beach APPENDIX B Comparison of traffic volumes that were taken as part of the 2018 EIR and the 2020 NTMP. Based on the EIR, the 2016 volumes were taken at one-hour intervals during the peak period from 7:00 to 9:00 am on Thursday, November 19, 2015 and Tuesday, December 1, 2015. 2018 EIR 2020 NTMP 2016 Existing Peak (7 - 9 am) 2019 Projected Peak (7 - 9 am) 2019 Projected w/ North School Open Peak (7 - 9 am) 2019 Existing Peak (7 - 9 am) 2019 Existing (24-hour) Gould Av Bet. Morningside Dr & Valley Dr EB WB 300 240 345 279 361 287 438 534 3,609 4,042 Valley Dr Bet. Gould Av & 25th St NB SB 200 410 204 417 212 441 439 480 2,084 4,299 Myrtle Av Bet. 26th St & 25th St NB SB 25 15 25 15 69 41 35 24 182 182 25th St Bet. Myrtle Av & 25th St/Park Av EB WB 45 60 45 61 76 128 33 33 186 174 6 EXHIBIT B Near Term Infrastructure Improvements District Cost Share % City Cost Share % Total Cost District Cost City Cost 1 Formal school loading/unloading along 25th St in front of school 100% 0% - - - 2 On-site school loading/unloading & ADA drop-off/pick- up 100% 0% - - - 3 Add pork-chop island at school driveway to restrict eastbound left-turn traffic from 25th St into school 100% 0% - - - 3 Right Turn only sign 100% 0% $ 405.00 $ 405.00 $ - 5 High visibility crosswalks - 25th St & Myrtle Av (E/S/W legs) 100% 0% $8,100.00 $8,100.00 $ - 6 High visibility crosswalk - 25th St & Manhattan Av (E/W legs) 30% 70% $4,275.00 $1,282.50 $ 2,992.50 7 High visibility crosswalk - 24th St & Manhattan Av (N/S legs) 30% 70% $5,225.00 $1,567.50 $ 3,657.50 10 Yellow centerline striping along 25th St/Park Ave (from Manhattan Ave to 24th St) 100% 0% $3,035.00 $3,035.00 $ - 12 High visibility crosswalk - 25th St & 25th St (E leg) 30% 70% $2,275.00 $ 682.50 $ 1,592.50 13 Red curb - east side of 25th St/Park/24th Pl 30% 70% $ 115.00 $ 34.50 $ 80.50 15 High visibility crosswalk - 24th Pl & 25th St/Park Av (E leg) 30% 70% $2,695.00 $ 808.50 $ 1,886.50 19 “Stop Ahead” roadway marking - 26th St heading west approaching Manhattan Ave 100% 0% $ 675.00 $ 675.00 $ - 27 Red curb - west side of Valley Dr, just north of Kiwanis Club (eliminates 2 on-street parking spaces) 30% 70% $ 350.00 $ 105.00 $ 245.00 29 High visibility crosswalk - Valley Dr & 25th St (W leg) 30% 70% $2,425.00 $ 727.50 $ 1,697.50 31 High visibility crosswalk - Valley Dr & 24th St (W leg) 30% 70% $2,275.00 $ 682.50 $ 1,592.50 Install Surface Applied Truncated Dome 30% 70% $12,050.00 $3,615.00 $ 8,435.00 Modify Existing Cast-in-Place Truncated Dome (Park Ave & 25th) 30% 70% $ 250.00 $ 75.00 $ 175.00 General Contractor Fee/Insurance/Bond 30% 70% $ 2,468.32 $ 740.50 $ 1,727.82 Totals $ 46,618.32 $ 22,536.00 $ 24,082.32 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0147 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH ACCESS, INC. TO PROVIDE ON-CALL ADA SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $90,000 (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1.Award a not-to-exceed $90,000 Professional Services Agreement to Access,Inc.to provide on -call ADA services to the City for three years; and 2.Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the Professional Services Agreement, subject to approval by the City Attorney. Executive Summary: In recent years,the City has been updating its Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)program as required by federal law.In addition to requiring accessibility to City facilities and services,the federal guidelines also require that a public agency must have a Certified Access Specialist (CASP)available on staff. The City recently issued a Professional Services Agreement to Access,Inc.for services to the City to assist in responding to ADA grievances filed by residents and to provide design alternatives and assessments for a beach access path. Based on the performance received to date as well as their previous knowledge of and familiarity with the City,staff recommends that Access,Inc.be retained as the City’s CASP consultant to help with all aspects of the City’s requirements for ADA compliance. Background: On March 24,2020,the City adopted a resolution approving an ADA Grievance Procedure for the fair and prompt resolution of grievances arising under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”)and the City Manager designated a City staff member as the coordinator for compliance with the grievance procedures. Further,to comply with federal laws,the City is required to have an adopted ADA Transition Plan in place.Although preliminary work has been performed on the ADA Transition Plan,there are more efforts necessary to bring it forward for adoption.Additionally,the law requires the City to have a Certified Access Specialist (CASP)available on staff or through consultant services to assist with the City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0147 Certified Access Specialist (CASP)available on staff or through consultant services to assist with the agency’s ADA program. Discussion: In October 2020,the City hired Access,Inc.to help with assessing several grievances that the City received in 2020.In addition to responding to the grievances,the consultant identified additional needs to meet the current Federal ADA requirements.Access,Inc.’s findings show the need for completion and adoption of a citywide ADA Transition plan that would outline how the City plans to make ADA improvements to infrastructure throughout the City. Based on Access,Inc.’s performance to date in completing the recent tasks and their extensive knowledge of the City,staff recommends retaining Access,Inc.as the City’s on-call ADA consultant to perform additional needs by awarding a not-to-exceed contract of $90,000 for a three-year term.Staff prepared a scope of work for Access,Inc.,which includes assisting with the ADA grievance procedure,assisting with the completion and adoption of the ADA Transition Plan,and providing CASP services for ADA compliance (Attachment 1). General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: Mobility Element Goal 2. A public realm that is safe, comfortable, and convenient for travel via foot, bicycle, public transit, and automobile and creates vibrant, people-oriented public spaces that encourage active living. ·2.10 Prioritize public right-of-ways. Prioritize improvements of public right-of-ways that provide heightened levels of safe, comfortable and attractive public spaces for all non- motorized travelers while balancing the needs of efficient vehicular circulation. Goal 3. Public right-of-ways supporting a multimodal and people-oriented transportation system that provides diversity and flexibility on how users choose to be mobile. Policies · 3.10 Require ADA standards. Require that all public right-of-ways be designed per Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards by incorporating crosswalks, curb ramps, pedestrian signals, and other components to provide ease of access for disabled persons. Parks + Open Space Element Goal 4.Direct and accessible routes and connections to parks, recreational facilities, and open space are provided. Policies ·4.4 ADA accessible park access. Install ADA and universally accessible amenities and equipment so that all parks, beach, and trail networks are accessible to all persons. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0147 Goal 6.The coast and its recreational facilities are easily accessible from many locations and by multiple transportation modes. Policies · 6.6 Universal access. Provide resources that improve accessibility to the beach for all visitors. Fiscal Impact: This agreement would be a not-to-exceed capacity contract in the amount of $90,000. Funding is contingent upon approval of the additional appropriation request of $90,000 included in Report 21- 0122 Midyear Budget Review 2020-21 on tonight’s agenda. Attachments: 1.Scope of work 2.Draft Professional Services Agreement Respectfully Submitted by: Lucho Rodriguez, Deputy City Engineer Concur: Marnell Gibson, Public Works Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ EXHIBIT A PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK FOR ON-CALL ADA CONSULTING SERVICES (01/16/21) 1. Assist with Procedures for Grievances Estimated cost: $25,000 Tasks may include: a. Review the current grievance procedures b. Assist the City’s ADA Coordinator in developing Grievance Response Procedures that provide timely responses and resolutions to complaints (from taking the call through resolution) c. Review new grievance complaints/requests and assess d. Provide a subject matter expert opinion on future complaints. When a grievance is determined to have merit, the consultant shall provide a detailed ADA inspection of the area(s) and/or accessible element(s). The inspection shall identify all violations and include field measurements of each non- compliant element along with code references, sketches, and photo documentation in a comprehensive report. At the conclusion of the ADA inspection the consultant shall provide cost effective recommendations on the be st way to correct the violations. 2. Assist with Adoption of a Transition Plan Estimated cost: $31,000 Tasks may include: a. Assemble all ADA Reports and merge pertinent data into one document b. Review the City’s Transition Plan and provide guidance in implementing accessibility elements into projects c. Attend City Council and Commission meetings for ADA items, including report preparation and presentations (say 2 meetings) d. Attend in staff and project meetings related to ADA compliance including report preparation and presentations (say 3 meetings) e. Create an ADA Resource repository with the Transition Plan, Accessibility Reports, applicable code documents and advisories 3. Provide CASP services for ADA compliance Estimated cost: $24,000 Tasks may include: f. Provide ADA inspection and CASP support for ADA compliance tasks including signage and striping g. Provide plan checking services for ADA compliance for Capital Projects (say 3 projects) h. Review the Community Resources Special Event Policy Guide for ADA compliance i. Consult the City in providing program accessibility to all its programs; services and activities ESTIMATED COST: $80,000.00 CONTINGENCY: $10,000.00 TOTAL: $90,00.00 PSA 20.012 Page 1 of 10 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ADA CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND ACCESS, INC. This AGREEMENT is entered into this 9th day of March 2021, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a general law city a municipal corporation (“CITY”) and Access, Inc. (“CONSULTANT”). R E C I T A L S A. The City desires to retain Access, Inc. to provide ADA consulting services to the City. B. The City does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services required under this agreement and therefore, the City desires to contract for consulting services to accomplish this work. C. The Consultant represents to the City that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement. D. The City desires to contract with the Consultant to perform the services as described in EXHIBIT A of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, the City and the Consultant agree as follows: 1. CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the task orders issued under this agreement attached as EXHIBIT A. B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a not to exceed amount of $90,000 for CONSULTANT’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement. D. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. E. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, by no later than the 10th day of each month, its invoice for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous month. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT all uncontested amounts set forth in CONSULTANT’s invoice within 30 days after it is received. Page 2 of 10 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. A. CONSULTANT will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF SERVICES attached hereto as Exhibit A. B. Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall perform its services with the same degree of care and skill ordinarily used by members of the design profession practicing under similar conditions at the same time and in the same locality of the Project. 3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period in accordance with the schedule of compensation incorporated in “Exhibit A.” 4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of the CONSULTANT are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from the CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is completed to the CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in “Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing by the CITY. 5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. 6. KEY PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT’s key person assigned to perform work under this Agreement is Brad Caldwell. CONSULTANT shall not assign another person to be in charge of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City. 7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire March 9, 2024 unless earlier termination occurs under Section 11 of this Agreement, or this Agreement is extended in writing by mutual agreement as necessary to complete the project. 8. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. Page 3 of 10 9. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 10. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. 11. TERMINATION. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days before the effective termination date. In the event of such termination, the CONSULTANT shall cease services as of the date of termination, and all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. 12. INDEMNIFICATION. A. CONSULTANT shall indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, and cost (including without limitation reimbursement of reasonable attorney’s fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) to the extent CONSULTANT's negligent of wrongful performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT, but excepting such loss or damage which is caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY. CONSULTANT shall reimburse the CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation as part of CITY’s total damages based upon CONSULTANT’S proportionate percentage of fault as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. The CONSULTANT shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement. B. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 17, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification. C. Except to the extent of an indemnification obligation set forth herein, to the Page 4 of 10 maximum extent allowable under applicable law, CITY agrees that CONSULTANT shall not be liable for any monetary damages in excess of the amounts paid to CONSULTANT under this agreement. CITY agrees that CONSULTANT shall not be liable for lost profits, lost opportunities, consequential or incidental damages resulting from CONSULTANT’s performance under this agreement. 13. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT’s professional services. CONSULTANT’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only. 15. AUDIT OF RECORDS. A. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement. B. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement. 16. CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement. CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by the City to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective me asures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement. 17. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. A. The CONSULTANT, at the CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies: 1. Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. The Consultant shall Page 5 of 10 require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the CONSULTANT for City. 2. General Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. 3. Automobile Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the CONSULTANT arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. 4. Professional Liability Coverage. The CONSULTA NT shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from the CONSULTANT’S operations under this Agreement, whether such operations are by the CONSULTANT or by its employees. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-per- occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. B. Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California, or which is approved in writing by City, and shall be endorsed as follows. CONSULTANT also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. CITY agrees that Section 17.b.1, 17.B.2 and 17.B.3 shall not apply to Professional Liability or Workers’ Compensation. 1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to Page 6 of 10 liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.” 2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self-insured retention the CITY may have shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy. 3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. 4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents. 5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. 6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the CITY. A ten (10) day written notice tot CITY shall apply to non- payment of premium. CONSULTANT shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to CITY prior to implementation of a reduction of limits or material change of insurance coverage as specified herein. C. CONSULTANT agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against Consultant arising out of the work performed under this agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY. D. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. At the CITY’s option, the CONSULTANT shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. E. The CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement. F. Failure on the part of the CONSULTANT to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11 above. Page 7 of 10 G. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the Consultant (as the named insured) should Consultant fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. Consultant understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by Consultant as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City pay the SIR or deductible on Consultant’s behalf upon the Consultant’s failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any action against Consultant for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by City due to the breach. 18. USE OF OTHER CONSULTANTS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY’s prior written approval to use any sub-consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must include approval of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. 19. FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the CONSULTANT of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of the CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONSULTANT for anything done, furnished or relating to the CONSULTANT’S work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of the CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by the CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of the CONSULTANT, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by the CITY for any defect or error in the work prepared by the Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents. 20. CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the CONSULTANT shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during the City’s review of the Consultant’s report or plans. Should the Consultant fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by the CITY, and the cost thereof shall be charged to the CONSULTANT. In addition to all other available remedies, the City may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by the City or may withhold payment otherwise owed CONSULTANT under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction. 21. NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONSULTANT by CITY for services performed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of CONSULTANT’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover payment for CONSULTANT’S services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year. Page 8 of 10 22. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: CITY CONSULTANT City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ATTN: Public Works Director Access, Inc. 2901 West Coast Hwy, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92663 ATTN: Matthew D. Steele Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of notices may be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or personally delivered as specified in this Section. 23. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and represents that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide emplo yee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT represents that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. 24. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein are generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT’s or CITY’s obligations under this Agreement. 25. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County. 26. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. 27. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. 28. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment Page 9 of 10 with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY. 29. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Contract, agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission or scanned and delivered via electronic mail. Such facsimile or electronic mail copies will be treated in all respects as having the same eff ect as an original signature. 30. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other. 31. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided. 32. ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to which that party or those parties may be entitle as part of prevailing party’s total damages attributed to the non-prevailing party’s proportionate percentage of fault as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. 33. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency. 34. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. It is understood and agreed that the City shall own all documents and other work product of the Consultant, except the Consultant’s notes and work papers, which pertain to the work performed under this Agreement. The City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the Consultant, but any re-use of such documents by the City on any other project without prior written consent of the Consultant shall be at the sole risk of the City. City agrees that Consultant will not have any liability to City, or any third party, for any revision or addition to, alteration or deviation from Consultant’s documents, data, drawings, maps and/or other materials prepared by Consultant pursuant to the Agreement (“Work Product”) occurring subsequent to Consultant’s completion of services under this Agreement or earlier termination of this Agreement, or for use of Consultant’s Work Product on another project by or on behalf of City, and City shall defend, indemnify and hold Consultant harmless from and against Page 10 of 10 all liability, loss, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees and disbursements, which Consultant may at any time sustain or incur by reason of any such use, revision, addition, alteration or deviation by or on behalf of City. Notwithstanding the above, Consultant shall retain ownership rights to its standard, non-Project specific, details, design and specifications 35. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (City and Consultant initials required at the following paragraph) By their initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is not a “consultant” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of consultant in Fair Political Practice Commission Regulation 18700.3(a) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials ______ Consultant Initials ______ IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT Justin Massey, Mayor By: Matthew D. Steele, President ATTEST: City Clerk Taxpayer ID No. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Jenkins, City Attorney City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0158 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 RECONSIDERATION OF THE DECEMBER 15, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE PARKING PLAN 20-4 REQUEST TO ALLOW MEDICAL CLINIC/OFFICE USES AT AN EXISTING MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING (PACIFIC PLAZA OFFICES) LOCATED AT 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BASED ON USE OF UP TO 40 SHARED PARKING SPACES WITH 2420 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (HOPE CHAPEL); AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1.Reconsider the December 15,2020 Planning Commission decision to approve Parking Plan 20-4 request to allow medical clinic/office uses at an existing multi-tenant commercial building (Pacific Plaza Offices)located at 2200 Pacific Coast Highway based on use of up to 40 shared parking spaces with 2420 Pacific Coast Highway (Hope Chapel);and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); 2.Conduct the Public Hearing; and 3.Adopt draft resolution sustaining the December 15,2020 Planning Commission decision to approve Parking Plan 20-4. Executive Summary: At the City Council meeting held January 12,2021,Councilmember Armato requested this item, which was listed among the Planning Commission actions on the agenda,be considered by the City Council at a future public hearing. The request was supported by Mayor Pro Tem Detoy. City Staff has been working with the applicant since 2018 to provide an opportunity for the applicant to apply for some kind of City entitlement that would resolve the outstanding parking issues at the property and to allow the option for the property to convert tenant spaces to medical use.When the building was approved and built in the early 1980s,all office uses (including medical)required City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 9 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0158 building was approved and built in the early 1980s,all office uses (including medical)required parking at a ratio of 1 parking space per 300 square feet.When the parking requirements subsequently changed years later,only existing medical tenant spaces were permitted to remain as medical uses.This created a situation where the property owner could not lease to medical uses since the City could not issue business licenses for uses that intensify parking demand in a building that is nonconforming to parking per Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC)Section 17.52.035.E. The applicant applied for a Parking Plan as outlined in HBMC Section 17.44.210 that,if approved, would allow the City to issue business licenses for medical uses. Background: ZONING:Specific Plan Area-8 (SPA-8) GENERAL PLAN:Community Commercial USE EXISTING/PROPOSED:Multi-tenant commercial building/ conversion to up to 100% medical clinic LOT SIZE:27,189 sq. ft. TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA: EXISTING:29,338 sq. ft. PROPOSED:No change. PARKING SPACES: PROVIDED ON-SITE:86 spaces PROPOSED SHARED:Up to 40 spaces at 2420 PCH TOTAL PROPOSED:Up to 126 combined spaces ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:Categorically Exempt, Section 15301 Class 1 Existing Facilities, as the project involves negligible or no expansion of an existing use. The subject site at 2200 PCH is located at the northeast corner of the City,on the southeast corner of PCH and 21st Street and in the Specific Plan Area 8 (SPA-8)zone with a Community Commercial General Plan land use designation.The 27,189 square foot lot houses an approximately 29,338 sq. ft.three-story multi-tenant commercial general office building.The building is three stories with the first story consisting of a subterranean garage while office suites are provided on the second and third floor levels.There are 35 tenant spaces (Attachment 6 pp.45-46).The site provides less than the required 86 spaces parking due to changes to the City’s parking code requirements over time. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 2 of 9 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0158 To the immediate south and on the direct street corner of the subject site is an existing commercial office building occupied by Guarantee Escrow (807 21st Street)and to the south and across 21st Street are single and multi-family residences zoned R-1 and R-2.To the immediate north of the subject site is a general office building occupied by Lane Design +Build (2212 PCH)and the Hope Chapel administrative/general office building (2306 PCH).An existing office building (2205 PCH)is located west and across PCH.To the east and across Borden Avenue are single-family residences located in the R-1 zone. In 1981,the Planning Commission approved a 31-unit commercial office condominium project at 2200 PCH,approving a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)pursuant to Planning Commission (PC) Resolution 81-26 (Attachment 9).The building was conceptually approved,and permits were issued in 1981 and construction was completed in 1985. At that time,the City zoning code required retail and office uses to provide one (1)parking space for each 300 square feet of gross floor area and did not distinguish between a higher parking requirement for medical clinics.The approved plans for 2200 PCH identify 92 required parking spaces based on the prior City code.The on-site parking supply has since been reduced to 86 on- site parking spaces in order to accommodate ADA required parking spaces. Since the building was built,the City’s parking standards have changed,rendering the building nonconforming to current parking standards (even for general office and retail use).Pursuant to HBMC Section 17.44.030,general office and retail uses now require one (1)parking space for every 250 square feet in gross floor area,whereas medical clinics require one (1)parking space per 200 square feet in gross floor area. The City has been working with the property management company for 2200 PCH (Vectra Management Group)since April of 2018 to find solutions to resolve the parking issues with the established medical clinic uses which,under current code,require more parking than general office uses.The City received a letter from the property owner’s representative on November 26,2019, addressing the City’s inability to approve additional medical clinic business license applications at the general commercial building located at 2200 PCH due to the current on-site parking supply.The City sent a letter responding on January 28,2020 (Attachment 8)and suggested that the property located at 2200 PCH apply for consideration of a Parking Plan before the Planning Commission. APPLICANT REQUEST The applicant requests consideration of a parking plan to accommodate existing and future medical clinic uses through utilizing up to 40 shared parking spaces located at 2420 PCH (Hope Chapel)at the southernmost end of the parking lot/structure (Attachment 6 pp.56-59)to accommodate up to 100 percent medical clinic/office uses at 2200 PCH.The building would remain unaltered as part of this request.No additional square footage would be added,the building envelope (height and mass)City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 3 of 9 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0158 this request.No additional square footage would be added,the building envelope (height and mass) would not be increased and the building design would remain unchanged.The existing parking space configuration and number of spaces would also remain unchanged. The applicant,represented by Srour &Associates,has provided a “Response to Appeal of Parking Plan 20-4” (Attachment 2). Past City Actions Date Description January 28, 2020 City sent letter to applicant with suggestion to apply for Parking Plan pursuant to HBMC 17.44.210 to resolve problem approving business licenses for medical uses. November 17, 2020 Planning Commission consideration of Parking Plan 20 -4; Planning Commission requested additional information regarding conversion of up to 100 percent medical use and parking management, including provision of available visitor parking and minimizing spill over to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. December 15, 2020 Planning Commission approval, with a vote of 2 -1, with two members recusing themselves due to nearby property interests. Analysis: At the November 17,2020 Planning Commission meeting,additional information was requested by the Commission regarding the applicant’s application for its parking plan that would allow for the conversion of up to 100 percent medical use and parking management,including provision of available visitor parking and minimizing spillover to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The applicant proposed additional information and plan elements in an attempt to alleviate these concerns.Specifically,through proposed parking management strategies,including reserved visitor parking,notification and encouragement of employees to park in the Hope Chapel off-site structure, and added signage within the parking areas requesting visitors and tenants not to park on neighboring residential streets.At the December 15,2021 Planning Commission meeting,the Planning Commission voted to approve the Parking Plan and included in the Resolution of Approval Conditions to further mitigate neighborhood impacts. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 4 of 9 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0158 Parking Management to Mitigate Neighborhood Impacts The applicant recommended,and the Planning Commission approved at its December 15,2021 meeting,the following actions to efficiently manage parking for the building,included as Conditions 6 and 8 in the proposed Resolution. Condition 6. All parking shall be shared (not designated)and shared parking use signage shall be established in all parking areas.Use of 40 parking spaces at 2420 Pacific Coast Highway shall be used by employees of tenants of 2200 Pacific Coast Highway except in circumstances when patrons of one or more tenants require overflow and spaces at 2420 Pacific Coast Highway when available. Condition 8. a)All parking spaces in the surface lot/deck (19 spaces)and the west subterranean parking garage (18 spaces)will be limited to visitor parking only.Signs shall be installed at the entry and inside the lot indicating that parking is for 2200 PCH visitors only with no employee or tenant parking. b)The Applicant shall make tenants aware of the availability of additional parking at 2420 PCH and request that they not park on neighboring streets. c)Signs shall be installed inside each of the three on-site parking lots indicating that additional parking is available at 2420 PCH during the hours of 7am to 6pm, Monday through Friday. d)Signs shall be installed inside each of the two subterranean parking lots requesting visitors and tenants not to park on neighboring streets. Existing Parking Conditions Parking for 2200 PCH is provided in the form of a surface parking lot/deck and subterranean parking (Attachment 6 pp.60-62).The property provides 86 on-site parking spaces-62 spaces are standard (4 of which are provided in tandem),24 spaces are compact,and 2 spaces are disabled (ADA compliant) spaces. There are currently three medical clinic businesses with a combined floor area of 2,756 sq.ft.which occupy 9.3%of the total gross floor area.The remaining 26,852 sq.ft.in gross floor area (90.7%)is occupied by general office and/or psychologist businesses (non-medical).The remaining 10,238 sq. ft.of gross floor area is used as common access corridors (elevators,stairs,and halls)and balconies and are therefore excluded from the gross floor area for parking calculation purposes pursuant to the definition of “gross floor area” provided in HBMC Section 17.44.010. The building contains 29,338 square feet of gross floor area which includes leasable tenant space, City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 5 of 9 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0158 restrooms, storage, and mezzanines on the third floor. It should be noted that there are no pending or immediate business license applications that would shift the building to increased medical use.Approval of the requested parking plan does not mean that the building would become all medical clinic/office use,but rather that it is the maximum use in terms of parking impacts permitted.It is expected that medical uses would increase incrementally with new leases for medical offices. Parking Plan HBMC Section 17.44.210 provides that a parking plan may be approved by the Planning Commission to allow for a reduction in the number of spaces required.The applicant shall provide the information necessary to show that adequate parking will be provided for customers,clients,visitors and employees.Factors such as the following may be taken into consideration:van pools,bicycle and foot traffic,common parking facilities,varied work shifts,valet parking,unique features of the proposed uses,peak hours of the proposed use as compared with other uses sharing the same parking facilities, and other methods of reducing parking demand. ADA Accessibility There are three main parking lots,all of which are ADA accessible through ramps or elevators ( Attachment 6 pp.60-62).The surface parking lot (19 spaces)and the West Subterranean Parking Garage (18 spaces),both accessible from PCH,are reserved for visitor parking.The East Subterranean Parking Garage (45 spaces) is accessible from 21st Street. Parking Study and Parking Analysis Existing Parking Demands and Surpluses The applicant submitted a parking analysis prepared by Linscott Law &Greenspan,dated October 19,2018 (Attachment 6 pp.22-32).Staff reviewed the parking analysis and concurs with the conclusion of the parking analysis which,taking into account the parking needs for 2200 PCH (based on actual parking counts conducted in July 2018),and a future scenario of 100%medical office use, the conversion to 100 percent medical office use would be adequately served by the 126-space supply for the 2200 PCH Building. Future/ Proposed Parking Demand and Surpluses The parking study indicates that the weekday peak demand for 100 percent medical office use would be 86 spaces (at 5:00 PM).Comparing this 86-space demand against the 126-space supply available for use by 2200 PCH yields in a future surplus of 40 spaces. The surplus is an estimate because it was derived from the application of City Code ratios which are conservative in nature to ensure no parking deficiencies.This aspect is illustrated by actual parking demand compilations from other sources,and detailed study of the actual parking demands of similarCity of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 6 of 9 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0158 demand compilations from other sources,and detailed study of the actual parking demands of similar sites.Parking Generation,published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)1 as well as articles published in ITE Journal provide additional sources for parking ratio information. Peer Review of Parking Study Completed An independent peer review was conducted on the applicant’s submitted parking analysis and staff’s analysis by the City’s parking and traffic consultant firm Interwest Group (Attachment 7).After review of the November 17,2020 staff report and October 19,2018 parking study by Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineer),the Interwest Group concluded that “the parking study prepared for this project conservatively concludes that future parking demand will be adequately accommodated by the existing 86 onsite spaces and 40 offsite shared-use spaces.” Additional analysis is provided in the Technical Appendix (Attachment 3),including:HBMC definitions,non-conforming Code sections,private parking agreement information with Hope Chapel, and parking analysis methodology. Environmental Determination: Staff finds the project to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act defined in CEQA Section 15301 Class 1 Existing Facilities,as the project involves negligible or no expansion of an existing use. The 27,189 square foot lot houses an approximately 29,338 sq.ft.three-story multi-tenant commercial general office building.The applicant requests consideration of a Parking Plan to accommodate existing and future medical clinic uses through utilizing up to 40 shared parking spaces located at 2420 PCH (Hope Chapel)at the southernmost end of the parking lot/structure to accommodate up to 100 percent medical clinic/office uses at 2200 PCH.The building would remain unaltered as part of this request.No additional square footage would be added,the building envelope (height and mass)would not be increased and the building design would remain unchanged.The existing parking space configuration and number of spaces would also remain unchanged. General Plan Consistency: PLAN Hermosa,the City’s General Plan,was adopted by the City Council in August 2017.The Parking Plan at 2200 Pacific Coast Highway supports several PLAN Hermosa goals and policies that are listed below. Land Use Element Goal 1.Create a sustainable urban form and land use patterns that support a robust economy and high quality of life for residents. Policies: ·1.1 Diverse and distributed land use pattern.Strive to maintain the fundamental pattern ofCity of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 7 of 9 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0158 ·1.1 Diverse and distributed land use pattern.Strive to maintain the fundamental pattern of existing land uses,preserving residential neighborhoods,while providing for enhancement of corridors and districts in order to improve community activity and identify. ·1.3 Access to daily activities.Strive to create sustainable development patterns such that the majority of residents are within walking distance to a variety of neighborhood goods and services,such as supermarkets,restaurants,churches,cafes,dry cleaners,laundromats, farmers markets, banks, personal services, pharmacies and similar uses. ·1.4 Diverse commercial areas.Promote the development of diversified and unique commercial districts with locally owned businesses and job- or revenue-generating uses. ·1.5 Balance resident and visitor needs.Ensure land uses and businesses provide for the needs of residents as well as visitors. ·1.7 Compatibility of uses.Ensure the placement of new uses does not create or exacerbate nuisances between different types of land uses. Goal 3. A series of unique, destination-oriented districts throughout Hermosa Beach. Policies: ·3.1 Unique districts.Encourage the development of local and city-wide districts and centers that address different community needs and market sectors and complement surrounding neighborhoods. ·3.4 Emerging employment sectors.Strive to create districts that support increased employment activity, particularly for growing or emerging economic sectors. Goal 13. Land use patterns that improve the health of residents. ·13.2 Social and health needs.Support the continuation of existing and new uses that enhance the social and health needs of residents. ·13.4 Private health uses.Allow for the development of private recreation,cultural, educational,institutional and health care uses along Corridors and Districts,where they are compatible with existing uses. Mobility Element Goal 4.A parking system that meets the parking needs and demand of residents,visitors,and employees in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Policies: ·4.1 Shared parking.Facilitate park-once and shared parking policies among private developments that contribute to a shared parking supply and interconnect with adjacent parking facilities. ·4.3 Reduce impacts.Reduce spillover parking impacts due to employee parking and seasonal and event-based demands. ·4.8 Ensure commercial parking.Ensure that prime commercial parking spaces are available City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 8 of 9 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0158 for customers and other short-term users throughout the day. ·4.11 Consolidated parking facilities.Consider the development of new small-scale parking structures or shared facilities outside of the Downtown core and incorporate adaptability standards so that they may serve other uses in the future. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Attachments: 1.Proposed City Council Resolution 2.Supplemental Information Provided by Applicant “Response to Appeal of Parking Plan 20-4” 3.Technical Appendix 4.November 17, 2020 Planning Commission Staff Report 5.December 15, 2020 Planning Commission Staff Report 6.Applicant Submittal -Request Letter,Plans,Parking Study,Shared Parking Easement,Tenant Roster and Photos (Provided as Attachments to November 17, 2020 Staff Report) 7.Parking Study Peer Review by Interwest 8.City Response Letter Re Medical Clinics and Parking at 2200 Pacific Coast Highway dated January 28, 2020 9.Planning Commission Resolution 81-26 (Current CUP) 10.Public Notice Poster Verification 11.Radius Map Respectfully Submitted by: Christy Teague, Senior Planner Concur: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 9 of 9 powered by Legistar™ RESOLUTION 21 –xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF DECEMBER 15, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE PARKING PLAN 20-4 REQUEST TO ALLOW MEDICAL CLINIC/OFFICE USES AT AN EXISTING MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING (PACIFIC PLAZA OFFICES) LOCATED AT 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BASED ON USE OF UP TO 40 SHARED PARKING SPACES WITH 2420 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (HOPE CHAPEL); AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. An application was filed by 2200 Associates LLC (C/O Raju Shah) on July 20, 2020, requesting approval of a Parking Plan 20-04 to allow for, but not mandate, 100 percent medical clinic/office uses at an existing multi-tenant commercial building (Pacific Plaza Offices) located at 2200 Pacific Coast Highway based on use of up to 40 shared parking spaces with 2420 Pacific Coast Highway (Hope Chapel). SECTION 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on November 17, 2020 and on December 15, 2020, at which time testimony and evidence, both oral and written, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission and Parking Plan 20-4 was approved by a 2-1 vote, with two Planning Commissioners recused due to financial interests in their property near the subject property. SECTION 3. On January 12, 2021, the City Council removed Parking Plan 20-04 from the Planning Commission List of Approved Actions on the Consent Calendar for reconsideration by the City Council at a Public Hearing. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on March 9, 2021. SECTION 4. The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act defined in CEQA Section 15301 Class 1 Existing Facilities, as the project involves negligible or no expansion of an existing use. The 27,189 square foot lot houses an approximately 29,338 sq. ft. three-story multi-tenant commercial general office building. The applicant requests consideration of a Parking Plan to accommodate existing and future medical clinic uses through utilizing up to 40 shared parking spaces located at 2420 PCH (Hope Chapel) at the southernmost end of the parking lot/structure to accommodate up to 100 percent medical clinic/office uses at 2200 PCH. The building will remain unaltered as part of this request. No additional square footage will be added, the building envelope (height and mass) will not be increased and the building design will remain unchanged. The existing parking space configuration and number of spaces will also remain unchanged. SECTION 5. Based on the testimony and evidence received, the City Council makes the following factual findings pertaining to the application for a Parking Plan pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 17.44.210: In 1981 the City zoning code required retail and office uses to provide one parking space for each 300 square feet of gross floor area and did not distinguish between a higher parking requirement for medical clinics. Since the building was built, the City’s parking standards have changed, rendering the building nonconforming to current parking standards. The proposed Parking Plan (PARK 20-4) to allow up to 100 percent medical clinic/office uses at an existing multi-tenant commercial building (Pacific Plaza Offices) located at 2200 Pacific Coast Highway based on use of up to 40 shared parking spaces with 2420 Pacific Coast Highway (Hope Chapel); as conditioned, is consistent with the zoning code and PLAN Hermosa through: 1) Applying the City’s non-conforming parking methodology which concludes that converting to 100 percent medical uses would require 27 net additional parking spaces which can be met though use of up to 40 shared spaced at 2420 PCH and with 2) Technical evidence provided through the parking analysis/study which concludes that the conversion to 100 percent medical office use would be adequately served by the 126- space supply due to the actual demand being 86-spaces yielding a future surplus of 40 spaces. SECTION 6. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby approves the proposed Parking Plan 20-04 subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The approximately 29,338 sq. ft. three-story multi-tenant office building shall be substantially consistent with plans and application submitted and approved by the Planning Commission on December 15, 2020 and City Council on March 9, 2021, authorizing up to 100 percent medical clinic uses. The Community Development Director shall review and may approve minor modifications that do not otherwise conflict with the Municipal Code or requirements of this approval, provided that the use is not changed, intensity of use is not increased and the arrangement of space would not increase negative impacts. Any substantial deviation, changes to the floor plan, site plan, building exterior or addition to the hours which alter the primary function of the use as a general commercial office and medical clinic building shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 2. Prior P.C. Resolution 81-26 pertaining to the subject property at 2200 Pacific Coast Highway shall remain in full force and effect. 3. An ‘Acceptance of Conditions’ affidavit shall be filed with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department stating that the applicant/property owner is aware of, and agrees to accept, all of the conditions of this permit of approval. 4. The parking access agreement shall be perpetually maintained. Future amendments to the existing parking access agreement between 2200 PCH and 2420 PCH and any new parking access agreements that in any way reduce the amount of available parking at 2200 PCH or 2420 PCH shall require approval of a Parking Plan Amendment by the Planning Commission prior to implementation. 5. 2200 PCH shall maintain a minimum of 86 parking spaces on-site during all hours of operation. 6. All parking shall be shared (not designated) and shared parking use signage shall be established in all parking areas. Use of 40 parking spaces at 2420 Pacific Coast Highway shall be used by employees of tenants of 2200 Pacific Coast Highway except in circumstances when patrons of one or more tenants require overflow and spaces at 2420 Pacific Coast Highway when available. 7. The two rear tandem spaces (four total spaces) shall be reserved for use of long-term visitors and employees. 8. The applicant shall implement parking management actions to efficiently manage parking, including: a) All parking spaces in the surface lot/deck (19 spaces) and the west subterranean parking garage (18 spaces) will be limited to visitor parking only. Signs shall be installed at the entry and inside the lot indicating that parking is for 2200 PCH visitors only with no employee or tenant parking. b) The Applicant shall make tenants aware of the availability of additional parking at 2420 PCH and request that they not park on neighboring streets. c) Signs shall be installed inside each of the three on-site parking lots indicating that additional parking is available at 2420 PCH during the hours of 7am to 6pm, Monday through Friday. d) Signs will be installed inside each of the two subterranean parking lots requesting visitors and tenants not to park on neighboring streets. 9. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation hereafter adopted that is applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. 10. The Planning Commission may review this Parking Plan and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood or to the public safety and welfare resulting from the subject use pursuant to the procedures for modification/revocation in the HBMC. 11. Approval of this permit shall be effective upon the permittee/owner providing evidence to the City of recording of the signed Acceptance of Conditions’ affidavit with the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office. SECTION 7. This permit shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owner of the property involved provide evidence to the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department of recording of the signed Acceptance of Conditions’ affidavit with the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this permit. The Parking Plan shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a business license. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. To the extent permitted by law, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Hermosa Beach, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the “indemnified parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any permit or approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney’s fees and costs in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this permit. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. Section 7 Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the final decision on this Parking Plan (either by the Planning Commission, or the City Council should they take jurisdiction of the project), must be made within 90 days after the final decision. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of March, 2021. MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ ____________________________________ City Clerk City Attorney 1 SROUR & ASSOCIATES Real Estate Development Services Group, Inc 2447 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 200 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 brandon@esrour.com 310/372-8433 February 22, 2021 Response to Appeal of Parking Plan 20-4 Mayor Massey Mayor Pro Tem Detoy Council Member Amato Council Member Campbell This submittal is in support of the Planning Commission’s action on December 15, 2020, approving a parking plan for the Pacific Plaza Offices at 2200 Pacific Coast Highway (2200 PCH). Background The building at 2200 PCH has 35 office suites and 86 on-site parking spaces. The office suites are accessed by outdoor balconies and walkways that face open-air courtyards. The City approved construction of the building in 1981 for general office use. At that time, general office use included medical offices, so both medical and non-medical offices were subject to the same parking requirement -- one parking space per 300 square feet of gross floor area. The City’s zoning code subsequently changed the parking requirement for medical offices to one parking space per 250 square feet. Beginning in 2018, the City has been denying business licenses to new medical office tenants at 2200 PCH, for lack of required on-site parking. Currently, only two of the 35 tenant spaces are occupied by medical offices (both are psychiatric practices). In 2018, the Applicant began working with the Department of Community Development and the City Attorney to address this issue. In a letter dated January 28, 2020, the City suggested that the Applicant apply for a Parking Plan pursuant to City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (“HBMC”) section 17.44.210. The Parking Plan was intended to include the use of 40 off-site parking spaces at 2420 PCH (Hope Chapel). The Applicant has the right to use these parking spaces on weekdays pursuant to a reciprocal easement with Hope Chapel. Over the next several months, the Applicant worked with the Community Development Staff to create a parking plan that meets the requirements of the City’s existing parking code. The Code has a specific provision that allows “non-conforming” parking to meet current standards through the addition of parking spaces, on- or off-site. Under the Code, the Applicant is required to provide 113 parking spaces in order to accommodate 100 percent medical office use at 2200 PCH. The Applicant is proposing to provide 126 parking spaces. 2 Parking Plan Application On July 20, 2020, the Applicant formally submitted an application for approval of a parking plan that would include a total of 126 parking spaces: 86 on-site spaces and 40 off-site parking spaces at 2420 PCH (Hope Chapel). The application included a parking study by Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers concluding that 100 percent medical office use would be adequately served with the addition of the 40 off-site spaces. The City’s parking and traffic consultant firm, Interwest Group, completed a peer review of the Linscott parking study that concurred with its findings. Planning Commission Approval The Planning Commission considered the application at hearings on November 17, 2020 and December 15, 2020. At the December 15 hearing, the Planning Commission approved the Parking Plan, with several conditions intended to minimize impact on the surrounding neighborhood. These included: 1) All parking spaces in the surface lot/deck (19 spaces) and the west subterranean parking garage (18 spaces) will be limited to visitor parking only. Signs shall be installed at the entry and inside the lot indicating that parking is for 2200 PCH visitors only with no employee or tenant parking; 2) The Applicant shall make tenants aware of the availability of additional parking at 2420 PCH and request that they not park on neighboring streets; 3) Signs shall be installed inside each of the three on-site parking lots indicating that additional parking is available at 2420 PCH during the hours of 7am to 6pm, Monday through Friday; and 4) Signs will be installed inside each of the two subterranean parking lots requesting visitors and tenants not to park on neighboring streets. Neighborhood Concerns Prior to the December 15, 2020 Planning Commission hearing, some neighbors voiced concerns about spillover parking in their neighborhood and the workability of the proposed off- site parking. The Planning Commission addressed those concerns in its conditions of approval. For instance, one commenter questioned whether off-site parking was suitable for visitors to a medical office. Under the conditions of approval, 37 of the on-site spaces would be for visitor parking only. These 37 spaces are in parking lots immediately adjacent to either the building’s main entrance or an elevator opening to the main entrance. Each of these access points is fully ADA accessible. The 40 off-site parking spaces will be available to tenants and visitors, if needed. A concern was also raised that approval of 100 percent medical use could lead to use of the building by a single tenant such as Kaiser Permanente. However, this scenario could not occur without City approval even with the permitted 100% medical office use. The current building design makes a single-tenant medical operation infeasible. The building is divided into 35 office condo units, the common walkways are outdoors, and major infrastructure 3 improvements would be required to accommodate an integrated medical facility. Moreover, reconfiguration of the existing condominium units would require City approval. The City’s consideration of these types of changes would come with a review of the adequacy of parking. Maintaining Economic Vitality and Access to Local Medical Services The significant shift in work routines and workspace usage over the past 12 months raises a concern regarding the local demand for general office uses going forward. There will be a shrinking pool of general office tenants in the near future. Medical offices can fill the gap, while maintaining the availability of medical services in the community. This was the intent of the zoning code in 1981, when the building was approved for up to 100 percent medical office use, as a subset of general office use. Although the City subsequently changed the parking requirement for medical offices, the Applicant, through the proposed parking plan, will meet the code requirements to regain the medical office use capability that was originally approved in 1981. Conclusion The Parking Plan, which originated as a solution suggested by the City, has the support of the Community Development Department, the City Attorney, and the Planning Commission. Moreover, parking plans like this are not only envisioned by the City’s Municipal Code (see HBMC, § 17.44.210), they also are encouraged by the City’s General Plan. The General Plan consistently encourages property owners to explore shared parking arrangements with other uses. (General Plan, Goal 4, Mobility Chapter [“[w]ith emphasis on residential parking needs, public and shared parking supply, and seasonal peak parking demands, services need not be one size fits all. Innovative parking supply solutions will be used to provide a variety of services tailored to different users in addition to adopting policies that will incentivize targeted business and commercial development of shared parking solutions.”.]) For the foregoing reasons, among others, we ask that you uphold the Planning Commission’s approval of Parking Plan 20-4, because it meets the requirements of the Zoning Code, it includes provisions that address concerns of neighborhood spillover parking, and it would not lead to a single-tenant medical operation in the building. In addition, your approval will be a step toward maintaining economic vitality in the City and preserving the availability of medical services in the Hermosa Beach. TECHNICAL APPLENDIX TO STAFF REPORT Information Originally Included in November 17, 2020 Staff Report City Code Definitions Provided below are the City commercial land use definitions and general definitions Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) Section 17.04) which include the following related classifications. "General office" means facilities where, as a primary use, the administrative activities of a business are performed. General office includes but is n ot limited to: D. Personal improvement services offices, including but not limited to counseling, tutoring and similar services. Excludes gymnasium/health and fitness center, educational institutions, medical office, beauty shops, massage therapy businesses, and similar uses. "Medical or dental clinic" means a place that provides patient care services on an outpatient basis. The City has been able to approve various business licenses for counselors and psychologist offices at 2200 PCH without requiring additional parking. This is because the use is classified as general office (and uses the parking standard for general office, not medical clinic). The City interprets Psychologists as general office because Psychologists focus extensively on psychotherapy and treating emotional and mental suffering in patients with counseling and behavioral intervention. Based on the code definition, the distinction is that “counseling” does not involve medical treatment, medical devices, medical testing, presence of nurses, and other aspects of a medical office. As articulated in the code, psychologists providing counseling services is a general office use. A Psychiatrists office, on the other hand, is a medical clinic since psychiatrists are trained medical doctors, they can prescribe medications, and they spend much of their time with patients on medication management as a course of treatment (which also may include scales, blood pressure and other medical tests to properly prescribe medication). Therefore, the city interprets Psychiatrists office as a medical clinic and not a general office. The city has also been able to approve various psychiatrists at 2200 PCH if the prior tenant space was occupied by a previously City approved med ical clinic. However, when a space is converted from office or retail to medical clinic, that change requires additional parking as set out in HBMC 7.52.035(E). Non-Conforming Sites- Changes to a More Intense Use with a Higher Parking Requirement The following limitations apply to buildings in commercial zones nonconforming as to parking. HBMC Section 17.52.035(E) states, “When the use of an existing commercial, manufacturing or other non-residential building or structure is changed to a more intense use with a higher parking requirement the requirement for additional parking shall be calculated as the difference between the required parking as stated in Section for that particular use as compared to the requirement for the existing or previous use, which shall be met prior to occupying the building unless otherwise specified in Chapter. In order for uses with higher parking requirements to operate on site, the building would need to provide additional parking spaces for the net increase in required parking. This is important for two reasons. First, if a tenant space was occupied by a prior medical clinic, which was issued a valid business license from the City, then a new medical clinic business could be approved for that same tenant space without providing the additional parking spaces. This is because the change in tenant is not an intensification for that space. However, due to the deficient code required parking at 2200 PCH, if the tenant space were previously occupied by a non -medical general commercial use (such as general office or retail) then a business license for a new medical clinic business could not be approved until additional parking could be provided for the higher parking intensive use (or through approval of a Parking Plan), which is the mechanism needed to authorize less than required parking such as through use of common/shared parking facilities. For these reasons, the current use mixture which includes various medical clinics must be properly permitted through 1) approval of a Parking Plan and then 2) approval of business license applications. Additionally, the November 2019 letter references a connection between parking at Hope Chapel and parking at 2200 PCH. In recent years, Hope Chapel has come in to the city for various entitlements and changes of use, which change the parking requirement for the site. The Hope Chapel site has received a Parking Plan, which is the mechanism provided in the HBMC for the city to authorize a reduced amount of parking based on the finding that the site is adequately parked. Private Parking Agreement History and City Approved Parking Plan Records In 2010 the property owner of 2200 PCH authorized Hope Chapel (2420 PCH) and the prior youth center (2510 PCH) to use parking at 2200 PCH on limited days and during limited hours. In 2010 the Planning Commission approved the shared parking plan through PC Resolution 10-6. The 2010 parking plan authorized Hope Chapel and the previous youth center (now Lazy Acres grocery store) to use shared parking at 2200 PCH. The approved parking plan did not authorize 2200 PCH to use parking at 2420 PCH, 2510 PCH or 950 Artesia Blvd to meet parking requirements at 2200 PCH. In 2017 the church owned properties received approval of a shared parking plan where all parking was provided on the church owned properties (2420 PCH, 2510 PCH and 950 Artesia Blvd). As such, the church and grocery store parking at 2200 PCH was no longer necessary, and PC Resolution 10-6 was rescinded and no longer in effect. Therefore, none of the 2200 PCH parking spaces are reserved for use by the neighboring church and grocery store properties. The 40 off-site shared parking spaces at 2420 PCH can be accessed from the sidewalk along PCH (Attachment 6 pgs. 63-64) so that people can move from one shared parking lot to another by foot. The City acknowledged the existence of the private parking agreement (Attachment 6 pgs. 35-44) between 2200 PCH and the Hope Chapel properties within the Parking Plan Resolution (PC Resolution 18-14).The Parking Study was updated accordingly, based on use of up to 40 spaces Monday through Friday from 7am to 6pm at Hope Chapel by the office tenants at 2200 PCH, and the Parking Study concluded that adequate parking will still be provided for the Hope Chapel, Lazy Acres and 950 Artesia Blvd on-site uses. This Parking Plan, however, only regulates the use of the buildings that were part of that application. Essentially the City found that even if tenants from 2200 PCH use up to 40 of the spaces during certain times of the day, the church and grocery store would still be adequately parked. The approved parking plan did not authorize 2200 PCH to use parking at 2420 PCH, 2510 PCH or 950 Artesia Blvd to meet parking requirements at 2200 PCH. Parking Study and Parking Analysis Methodology: Net Increase Parking Methodology for Existing Non-Conforming Buildings 29,338 sq. ft. (gross floor area) 2,756 sq. ft. (existing medical) / (1:200 medical ratio) = 14 parking spaces 26,582 sq. ft. (existing non-medical) / (1:250 non-medical ratio) = 106 parking spaces Total non-conforming code required parking = 120 parking spaces Request to convert 26,582 sq. ft. (existing non-medical) to medical (1:200) = 133 parking spaces 133 (required for medical conversion) - 106 (existing non-medical parking credit) = Net increase in 27 parking spaces required. Going from 26,852 sq. ft. of general office uses to 100 percent medical uses would require 27 net additional parking spaces from the 86 parking spaces currently provided on-site at 2200 PCH. Therefore, the net increase in code required parking can be met though use of up to 40 shared spaced at 2420 PCH. Existing Parking Demands and Surpluses The applicant submitted a Parking Analysis prepared by Linscott Law & Greenspan, dated October 19, 2018 (Attachment 7 pgs. 22-32). Planning Staff reviewed the Parking Analysis and concurs with the conclusion of the Parking Analysis which, taking into account the empirical parking needs for 2200 PCH (based on actual parking counts conducted in July 2018), and a future scenario of 100% medical office use, the conversion to 100 percent medical office use would be adequately served by the 126- space supply for the 2200 PCH Building. . Parking demand surveys were conducted on Wednesday, July 25, 2018, and Saturday, July 27, 2018, to determine the existing parking needs of the existing tenants at the 2200 PCH Building. The Building was at 100% tenancy (i.e., fully occupied) when the parking demand counts were performed. As indicated on Table 2, the weekday peak demand observed for 2200 PCH was 41 spaces (at 3:00 PM). Comparing this 41-space demand against the on-site supply of 85 spaces for 2200 PCH results in an existing, actual/operational surplus of 44 spaces1. Based on this, the current parking needs of the 2200 PCH building are fully met by spaces on site, without having to rely on the use of off-site parking spaces (i.e., up to 40 spaces at 2420 PCH). Under weekday conditions presented on Table 2, the total weekday peak demand for 2200 PCH and the Hope Chapel structure is 127 spaces (at 11:00 AM). Comparing against the total supply of 210 spaces, the 127-space peak demand results in a surplus 83 spaces2. Table 3 indicates an actual surplus of 182 spaces at the minimum. Future/ Proposed Parking Demand and Surpluses The applicant is interested in implementing development Scenario 2 (100 percent medical). Table 5 indicates that the weekday peak demand under development Scenario 2 would be 86 spaces (at 5:00 PM). Comparing this 86-space demand against the 125-space supply available for use by 2200 PCH yields in a future surplus of 39 spaces3. The 39-space surplus under Scenario 2 is a conservative estimate because it was derived from the application of City Code ratios. The actual parking requirements for medical offices have been found to be less than the City Code requirement of 5 spaces per 1,000 SF. This aspect is illustrated by actual parking demand compilations from other sources, and detailed study of the actual parking demands of similar sites. Parking Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)1 as well as articles published in ITE Journal provide additional sources for parking ratio information. In addition, other jurisdictions in Los Angeles County and that are near the City of Hermosa Beach all have code parking ratios for medical office buildings that are less, as follows: • Redondo Beach (for chiropractic, physical therapy, psychotherapy): 3.33 • spaces per 1,000 SF • Rancho Palos Verdes: 4 spaces per 1,000 SF • Santa Monica: 4 spaces per 1,000 SF • Hawthorne: 3.33 spaces per 1,000 SF • Culver City: 2.86 spaces per 1,000 S See Attachment 3 Applicant Supplemental Memo Clarifying Parking Space Adjustments Over Time 1 86 actual spaces based on current conditions resulting in an actual surplus of 45 spaces (see applicant supplemental memo dated 10-28-20 clarifying parking count adjustments over time) 2 211 actual spaces based on current conditions resulting in an actual surplus of 84 spaces (see applicant supplemental memo dated 10-28-20 clarifying parking count adjustments over time) 3 126 actual supply yields an actual surplus of 40 spaces (see applicant supplemental memo dated 10 -28-20 clarifying parking count adjustments over time) ATTACHMENT 1 1 SROUR & ASSOCIATES Real Estate Development Services Group, Inc 2447 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 200 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 brandon@esrour.com 310/372-8433 Request for Approval of Parking Plan and Acknowledgement of Four Tandem Parking Spaces at 2200 Pacific Coast Highway Attachments: Universal Planning Application 2200 PCH Office Floor Plans 2200 PCH Parking Floor Plans 2200 PCH Parking Photos 2200 PCH Tenant Roster 2420 PCH Parking Floor Plans 2420 PCH Parking Photos Path of Travel 2200 to 2420 PCH 2200 – 2420 Parking Easement Agreement Parking Study for 2200 PCH PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2200 Associates, LLC (“applicant”) hereby requests that the City of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) formally approve a Parking Plan for 2200 Pacific Coast Highway (“PCH”) pursuant to City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (“HBMC”) section 17.44.210 (“Parking Plan”). The applicant also requests that the approval acknowledge four existing tandem parking spaces at 2200 PCH. By seeking a Parking Plan approval, the applicant seeks formal acknowledgment that the Property complies with City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) parking requirements for 100 percent medical office use based on the existence of 86 on-site parking spaces and 40 off-site parking spaces. 1. Justification for 100 Percent Medical Office Use with Current Available Parking Original City Approval 2200 (PCH) is a commercial building built in 1981, approved for general office use. At that time, the HBMC required three parking spaces per 1,000 s.f.., or 92 parking spaces, for the building. 2 Existing Parking Ratios under the HBMC The HBMC bases parking requirements on the proportion of a building’s “gross floor area.” 1 occupied by a particular type of use. Whereas in 1981, the HBMC considered medical office use as a subset of general office use, and therefore subject to the same parking requirement, the code now imposes different parking requirements for general office and medical office uses. General office use now requires four spaces per 1,000 s.f. (or 1:250). Medical office use now requires five spaces per 1,000 s.f. (or 1:200). (See HBMC, § 17.44.030.). The Existing Mix of Uses at 2200 PCH is 9.3% Medical and 90.7% General Office 2200 PCH has a gross floor area of 29,338 s.f., based on a floor plan survey of each office prepared by Lasertech in July 2017 (Attachment 2 of the application). Per the HBMC, the building’s gross floor area is calculated as the aggregate gross floor area of all offices plus the gross floor area of all restrooms. The City considers an office to be a medical office if it involves the provision of services by a medical doctor. To determine how much of the gross floor area of 2200 PCH currently is occupied by medical offices, versus general office space, we matched up the gross floor area of each office with its tenant and identified whether the tenant’s business involved the provision of services by a medical doctor. Based on such a survey, we determined the medical/general office usage to be as follows: Medical Offices: 1147.8 sq. ft. Wellness Institute of Southern California (Suite 217) 753.9 sq. ft. Kelly Waggoner and Michele Blume (Suite 215) 855.1 sq. ft. Alann Dingle, Jacqueline Mills, and Elizabeth Cowart (Suite 218) 2,756 sq. ft. Building Gross Floor Area: 29,338 s.f. Total Medical Use: 2,756 sq. ft. or 9.3% Medical Office Use Total General Office Use: 26,582 s.f. or 90.7% General Office Use This analysis is based on the current tenant roster set forth below. 1 The term “gross floor area” means “the total area occupied by a building or structure, excepting therefrom only the area of any inner open courts, corridors, open balconies (except when utilized, e.g., restaurant seating or similar usage), and open stairways. Such total area shall be calculated by measuring along the outside dimensions of the exterior surfaces of such building or structure.” HBMC, § 17.44.010. 3 No. of Tenant Spaces Unit No. Current Tenant Roster Medical Use (S.F.) Non-Medical Use (S.F.) Floor Plan Page No. 1 101 Easy Reader 662.6 2 2 102 Sepideh Bassi 445.7 2 3 103 Vacant – Previously General Office 629.3 2 Restroom 137 2 4 200 Garee Gasperian 354.2 6 5 201 Cheryl Morrow and Diana Lipson-Burge 902.9 6 6 203 Hirsch Entertainment Group 1183.5 6 7 204 Behrens Racing 252 6 8 205A Christopher O'Hara 316.4 6 9 205B Ann Christensen and Naomi Resnik 257.8 6 10 206 Leah Niehaus 254.7 6 11 207 Bobbie Lesser, Robert Rutman, and Karin Tamura 757.5 6 12 209 Kate Mosier and Jennifer Jordan 621.2 6 13 210 Megan McCormick and Maureen Jennings 1073.9 6 14 212 Mary Klem and Bill Klem 378.5 6 15 214 Tina Hartney, Kamala Horwitz and Carol Kole 764.2 6 16 215 Kelly Waggoner and Michele Blume 753.9 6 17 217 Wellness Institute of Southern California 1147.8 6 18 218 Alann Dingle, Jacqueline Mills, and Elizabeth Cowart 855.1 6 19 219 Christopher Stretch, Danielle Borah and Allen Berger 617.7 6 20 220 Oliver & Oliver Associates 523.3 6 Restroom approx. 250 6 21 301 Vacant – Previously PHR Management 1181.6 9 22 302 Law Offices (Barrington/Poliner, Ronnie) 1646.9 9 23 304 Quartz Events 759.3 9 24 304A/306 Recovery Now/Positive Counseling Center 827.5 9 25 305 CAP Investment Properties 2110.0 9 26 307 Quartz Events 1267.3 9 27 308 Vacant – Previously Kentwood Bancorp. 1253.7 9 28 310 Coldwell Banker 959.9 9 29 312 Dawn Strachan, CEA, CDFA 1289.4 9 30 312A Jon Kramer and Kim Davidson 246.9 9 31 314 Chatten-Brown & Carstens 318.4 9 32 316 Highland Partners 1653.6 9 33 317 Total Success Staffing Services 812.8 9 34 318 Chatten-Brown & Carstens 1303.9 9 35 320 Salomon Forensics 317.8 9 Restroom approx. 250 9 Total = 35 Total S.F. = 29,338 2,756 26,582 113 Parking Spaces are Required for a Change to 100 Percent Office Use The parking requirement for medical office use is greater than that required for general office use. Therefore, a change from 9.3% medical office use to 100% medical office use triggers a change in the required parking. 4 Under HBMC 17.52.035(E), when the use of an existing commercial building is changed to a more intense use with a higher parking requirement, the requirement for additional parking is the difference between the currently required parking for that particular use and the existing available parking. In order for uses with higher parking requirements to operate on site, the building would need to provide additional parking spaces for the net increase in required parking. In this case, the gross floor area subject to the change in use is 26,582 sq. ft. of general office space. The current required parking for 26,582 sq. ft. of general office spaces is 106 parking spaces. The required parking for 26,582 sq. ft. of medical office space is 133 parking spaces. The net increase for required parking is 27 parking spaces. Therefore, to support a change in use to 100% medical office space, the required parking is 86 spaces (current) plus 27 spaces (net increase), which equals 113 parking spaces. 2200 PCH has 126 Available Parking Spaces 2200 PCH has 86 on-site parking spaces and access to 40 off-site parking spaces. 2 Four of the on-site spaces are tandem spaces. The site has access to the additional 40 off-site spaces at 2420 PCH by way of an easement agreement (“Parking Easement”) with the property owner, International Church of the Four Square Gospel (Hope Chapel). The City has acknowledged the existence of the Parking Easement. (See, Planning Commission Resolution 18-14, enclosed herewith.) The City noted if 2200 PCH used the 40 spaces subject to the easement, Hope Chapel would still be adequately parked. (Id.) An easement is a property right. (See People v. Kubic (1967) 254 Cal.App.2d 470.) The Parking Easement permits access to the 2420 PCH parking stalls on Mondays through Fridays, from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm. Those times are consistent with the peak hours for uses on the 2200 PCH and the off-peak times for 2420 PCH. The Parking Easement also sets forth maintenance obligations on the 2420 PCH. (See, Parking Easement, at p. 2.) Such obligations ensure that the parking stalls will be maintained in accordance with the intent of HBMC section 17.44.060, governing “common parking facilities.” The Property has enjoyed the right to use the additional parking spaces at 2420 PCH since the early 1980s, either through a parking easement or the original joint ownership of the two parcels. Notably, 2200 Associates granted Hope Chapel a similar easement for the benefit of 2420 PCH to use 40 parking stalls at 2200 PCH from 6:00 PM on Fridays to 12:00 AM on Sundays. The two easements therefore appear to be reciprocal. The 2018 Parking Analysis In 2018, Linscott, Law & Greenspan prepared a parking analysis finding that with the combined 126 on-site and off-site parking spaces, 2200 PCH had a sizable surplus of parking compared to parking demand. We note that the Linscott Analysis had certain assumptions that varied from those in our application. For instance, the Linscott Analysis used a “net building area” of 27,406 sq. ft. and identified only 85 parking spaces on site. As to the number of parking spaces, the Linscott Analysis lists 46 spaces in the gated east subterranean parking garage for tenants. A current survey of that garage shows only 45 spaces, because one of the spaces is 2 The reduction in on-site spaces of 92 in 1981 to 86 at present is the result of re-striping to incorporate ADA spaces and the loss of spaces due to the installation of equipment partially blocking spaces. 5 blocked by mechanical equipment. The Linscott Analysis lists only 2 tandem spaces, though both the current parking survey and the original site plans show 4 tandem parking spaces. Furthermore, the Linscott Analysis did not find any existing medical offices on site, but we are not aware of whether Linscott investigated whether any were occupied by medical doctors. Notwithstanding these issues, we believe that the findings of the Linscott Analysis remain applicable to the parking conditions on the site, given the large surplus of available spaces identified by the Analysis. 2. Conclusion The total available parking for 2200 PCH is 126 spaces, exceeding both the 92 spaces required by the 1981 City approval and the 113 spaces required by a change in use under the current code. We request that the Planning Commission formally approve a Parking Plan pursuant to HBMC section 17.44.210, including acknowledgment of four tandem parking spaces, thereby finding sufficient parking for 100 percent medical office use at 2200 PCH. ATTACHMENT 2 OFFICE AREA OFF WOM MEN OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE AREA DN DN DN UP DN UP DN 22'-8"17'-6"9'-10"9'-10" 9'-7"20'-2" 24'-8" 6'-6" 9'-11" 9'-4" 9'-11" 30'-0" 12'-1"13'-5"10'-11" 7'-6" 13'-6" 20'-7" 101 103 102 DN SCALE 0 5 10 15 20 Survey Accuracy: +/-%0.10 PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA TEL:(888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved 21st STBORDEN AVE PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FLOOR PLAN (As Measured: June 2017) (Last Updated: July 2017) FIRST FLOOR *Measured Area: 2,782 s.f. Exterior Area: 837 s.f. Parking Area: 20,250 s.f. Note: All dimensions shown are rounded to the nearest inch, for informational purposes only. All measurements are recorded to 1/8" accuracy as documented in the final CAD drawing supplied. *Measured Area represents the footprint of the floor, and is used solely for billing purposes. It is NOT to be used for leasing purposes. PAGE 1 OFFICE AREA OFF WOM MEN OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE AREA DN DN DN UP DN UP DN 101 103 102 DN SCALE 0 5 10 15 20 Survey Accuracy: +/-%0.10 PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved 21st STBORDEN AVE PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (As Measured: June 2017) (Last Updated: November 2017) FIRST FLOOR Exterior Walkway: 646 s.f. Stairs: 191 s.f. LEASE PLAN PAGE 2 DN DN DN UP DN UP Parking Exterior Parking Area DN 22'-8"17'-6"9'-10"9'-10" 9'-7"20'-2" 24'-8" 6'-6" 9'-11" 9'-4" 9'-11" 30'-0" 12'-1"13'-5"10'-11" 7'-6" 13'-6" 20'-7" Exterior Walkway Building Storage 27'-0"26'-1"27'-0"27'-0"27'-0"27'-1"27'-1"26'-10" 53'-4" 17'-4" 27'-0" 17'-6" 63'-6" 79'-8"73'-1" 80'-0"21st STPACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 57'-8" 98'-5" 79'-5" DN 61'-11" 17'-11" 8'-3" 8'-6" 20'-0" SCALE 0 5 10 15 20 Note: All dimensions shown are rounded to the nearest inch, for informational purposes only. All measurements are recorded to 1/8" accuracy as documented in the final CAD drawing supplied. PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved BORDEN AVE (As Measured: June 2017) (Last Updated: July 2017) FIRST FLOOR PARKING PLAN Survey Accuracy: +/-%0.10 PAGE 3 DN DN DN UP DN UP DN DN 5 98 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 28 27 26 17 PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved BORDEN AVE PHOTO KEYMAP (As Measured: June 2017) FIRST FLOOR 21st STPACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY PAGE 4 14'-2" OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE MEN DN OFFICE OFF OFFICE OFFICE KIT OFFICE WAITING RM WAITING RM MASSAGE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE WAITING OFFICE N/A OFFICE OFFICE OFFICEOFFICE AREAWAITING OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE WAITING KIT OFFICE OFFICE AREA FAX/COPY AREA WAITING KITCHEN STORAGE Tel/ Comm MASSAGE Meters WAITING MASSAGE EXAM STRG OFFICE EXAM OFFICE OFFICEOFFICE KITCHEN WOMEN OFFICE OFFICE EXAM KIT OFF KITCHEN KITCHEN OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFF OFFICE AREA RECEP Waiting Rm Balcony Courtyard Balcony Trash Strg DECK Meters Patio Planter Planter (Open To Above) 207 205A 205B 209 200 204212 206 210 203 214 217 218 219 215 220 DN UP DN UP DN DN DN UPDNUP UP UP 16'-9" 9'-8" 12'-0" 14'-5" 6'-3"13'-8"12'-1"11'-5"11'-9"17'-6"11'-8" 10'-3" 10'-4" 11'-4" 12'-3" 7'-0" 10'-6" 19'-4" 11'-4" 11'-7" 12'-0" 11'-10"12'-2"11'-6"11'-4"11'-7"14'-2" 11'-8" 8'-5" 25'-0" 10'-7" 15'-9" 9'-4" 17'-1" 20'-9" 12'-2" 8'-1"11'-9" 11'-1" 6'-8" 12'-3" 18'-0" 12'-5" 11'-7"11'-7"17'-9" 13'-3" 10'-2" 10'-7" 8'-0" 12'-8" 16'-10"12'-0" 13'-2" 15'-8" 12'-9" 9'-6"28'-6" 10'-5" 11'-6" 14'-2"15'-0" 15'-1" 9'-11" 15'-2" WAITING 17'-3" 19'-6" OFFICE 9'-2" 9'-3" 11'-10"14'-5" 10'-1" 10'-1" 11'-1" 15'-1" 11'-4" 11'-6"11'-6"17'-7" 13'-0"11'-7"10'-0" 10'-5" 10'-2" 10'-2" 11'-4" 20'-9" 10'-2" 10'-2" 11'-9" 14'-1"11'-9"7'-7" 12'-1" 16'-3" 8'-8" 26'-7" 13'-8" 10'-0" 8'-7" 14'-11" 12'-5" 12'-1"14'-0" 13'-10" 8'-0" 8'-9" 17'-10" 11'-0" 9'-7" 15'-1" 26'-2" 49'-10" 5'-5" 5'-2" 8'-3" 5'-5" 202 Balcony (Open To Above)Balcony OFFICE AREA 210-BALCONY 210-BALCONY 207-BALCONY 203-BALCONY 218-BALCONY 219-BALCONY Balcony 25'-6" 4'-5" 18'-8" 4'-1" 5'-6" 19'-1" 5'-7" 32'-2" Balcony 5'-8" 5'-9" CTYD-2 CTYD-1 Courtyard Courtyard (Open To Above) 20 SCALE 150 5 10 353025 40 FLOOR PLAN Survey Accuracy: +/-%0.09 Note: All dimensions shown are rounded to the nearest inch, for informational purposes only. All measurements are recorded to 1/8" accuracy as documented in the final CAD drawing supplied. PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved *Measured Area represents the footprint of the floor, and is used solely for billing purposes. It is NOT to be used for leasing purposes. (As Measured: June 2017) SECOND FLOOR *Measured Area: 18,068 s.f. Exterior Area: 622 s.f. PAGE 5 OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE MEN DN OFFICE OFF OFFICE OFFICE KIT OFFICE WAITING RM WAITING RM MASSAGE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE WAITING OFFICE N/A OFFICE OFFICE OFFICEOFFICE AREAWAITING OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE WAITING KIT OFFICE OFFICE AREA FAX/COPY AREA WAITING KITCHEN STORAGE Tel/ Comm MASSAGE Meters WAITING MASSAGE EXAM STRG OFFICE EXAM OFFICE OFFICEOFFICE KITCHEN WOMEN OFFICE OFFICE EXAM KIT OFF KITCHEN KITCHEN OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFF OFFICE AREA RECEP Waiting Rm Balcony Courtyard Balcony Trash Strg DECK Meters Patio Planter Planter (Open To Above) 207 205A 205B 209 200 204212 206 210 203 214 217 218 219 215 220 DN UP DN UP DN DN DN UPDNUP UP UP WAITING OFFICE 202 Balcony (Open To Above)Balcony OFFICE AREA 210-BALCONY 210-BALCONY 207-BALCONY 203-BALCONY 218-BALCONY 219-BALCONY Balcony Balcony CTYD-2 CTYD-1 Courtyard Courtyard (Open To Above) 20 SCALE 150 5 10 353025 40 LEASE PLAN PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved Survey Accuracy: +/-%0.09 (As Measured: June 2017) (Last Updated: November 2017) SECOND FLOOR Stairs: 187 s.f.Stairs: 98 s.f.Planter: 144 s.f. Planter: 125 s.f.Balcony: 23 s.f. Balcony: 35 s.f. Balcony: 11 s.f. AREAS COMPUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI/BOMA (Z65.1) 2017 OFFICE STANDARD, METHOD A (Multiple Load Factors Method). PAGE 6 DN DN UP DN UP DN DN DN UPDNUP UP UP PHOTO KEYMAP PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved 37 38 3536 34 99 33 31 32 0 40 39 41 30 1 29 2 (As Measured: June 2017) SECOND FLOOR PAGE 7 OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICEOFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFF OFFICE OFFICEOFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE Open To Below Open To Below Open To Below Open To Below Void Open To Below Open To Below Open To Below Open To Below Open To Below O To B Void Open To Below Void Open To Below Open To Below Open To BelowOpen To BelowOpen To Below 305-MEZZ 316-MEZZ Strg TEL/COMM STRG OFF AREA Strg 301-MEZZ OFF AREA OFF AREA WAITING RM OFFICE AREA OFF AREA OFFICE AREAKIT OFF AREA OFFICE AREA WAITING RM KIT OFF AREA WOMEN MEN WAITING RM WAITING RM OFFICE AREA BREAK RM KIT KIT OFF AREA Balcony OFFICE STORAGE Balcony CONF RM TEL/COMM/HVAC/STRGTEL/COMM 307-MEZZ 302-MEZZ 318-MEZZ 321-MEZZ 310-MEZZ 312-MEZZ304-MEZZ CONF RM CONF RM TEL/COMM BREAK RM TEL/COMM 304A/306 304 305 307 302 316 310 314 318 312 312A 320 321 1'-7"8'-7" 4'-0" DN DN DN DN UP UP UP To Mezz UP UP DN DN DN DNDN UP UP UP DN DN UP UP DN DN DN UP UP DN DN DNDNDNDN DN UP To Mezz SL SL UP SL DN SL DN SL DN SL DN SL DN SL DN SL DN SL DN SL DN SL DN 11'-4" 12'-0" 12'-6" 11'-1" 7'-11" 8'-1" 8'-0" 11'-1" 13'-5" 20'-9" 9'-1" 20'-9" 9'-9" 13'-3" 10'-5" 9'-9" 19'-6" 9'-5" 14'-2"12'-0" 13'-0" 6'-3" 6'-0" 14'-6"9'-11" 13'-3" 10'-0" 10'-8" 9'-6" 11'-9"11'-6" 10'-2" 10'-2" 5'-6" 30'-0" 13'-5" 13'-5" 11'-7" 9'-5" 10'-8" 30'-3" 11'-6"17'-7" 11'-10" 20'-0"30'-3" 11'-6"11'-10" 14'-5" 11'-8" 11'-8" 14'-5" 10'-8" 6'-1" SL DN 14'-9" 14'-10" 11'-7" 9'-4"11'-7" 7'-10" 27'-6" 12'-1" 5'-5" 5'-7" 32'-2" 20'-2" 8'-7" 13'-5" 12'-10" 13'-0" 13'-3" 14'-2"11'-10"11'-5"14'-9" 11'-9"14'-3" 30'-9" 8'-10" 15'-1" 11'-9" 17'-3" 11'-9"18'-4"17'-2"14'-3" 13'-9"11'-4"23'-9" 11'-5" 8'-3" 8'-1" 9'-6" 18'-1" 5'-5" 10'-8" 9'-7" 20'-7" 5'-6" 9'-4"16'-10" 20'-8" 11'-5" 20'-9" 6'-4" 30'-3" 11'-7"14'-5" 20'-7" 17'-6" 8'-5" 14'-7" 7'-9" 11'-5" 8'-6"11'-1" 11'-7" 20'-7" 17'-6"23'-7"11'-5" 5'-5" 9'-3" 9'-0" 11'-7" 9'-5" 10'-11" 14'-3" 11'-7"11'-5"8'-7" 17'-6" 13'-7" 12'-11" 11'-6"5'-4"11'-0"15'-1" 9'-5" 18'-11" 17'-4"11'-8" 5'-3" 7'-1"5'-5" 19'-1" 20'-11" 26'-8" 5'-5" 14'-11" 19'-3" 13'-0" 11'-7" 16'-2" Balcony To Mezz UP To Mezz To Mezz UP To Mezz To Mezz UP To Mezz UP To Mezz To Mezz To Mezz Balcony Balcony Attic Attic Attic OFF AREA OFFICE O To B Void 301-BALCONY 302-BALCONY 318-BALCONY 321-BALCONY 4'-0" 18'-7" 5'-8" 5'-9"5'-6" 11'-7" 5'-8" 11'-9"5'-10" 308-MEZZ 301 308 308-BALCONY Balcony Balcony BALC-1 BALC-2 BALC-3 20 SCALE 150 5 10 353025 40 FLOOR PLAN Survey Accuracy: +/-%0.09 Note: All dimensions shown are rounded to the nearest inch, for informational purposes only. All measurements are recorded to 1/8" accuracy as documented in the final CAD drawing supplied. PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved *Measured Area represents the footprint of the floor, and is used solely for billing purposes. It is NOT to be used for leasing purposes. (As Measured: June 2017) THIRD FLOOR *Measured Area: 20,945 s.f. Exterior Area: 627 s.f. 8'-9"Spot Height AFF: ELEVATION LEGEND PAGE 8 OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICEOFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFF OFFICE OFFICEOFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE Open To Below Open To Below Open To Below Open To Below Void Open To Below Open To Below Open To Below Open To Below Open To Below O To B Void Open To Below Void Open To Below Open To Below Open To BelowOpen To BelowOpen To Below 305-MEZZ 316-MEZZ Strg TEL/COMM STRG OFF AREA Strg 301-MEZZ OFF AREA OFF AREA WAITING RM OFFICE AREA OFF AREA OFFICE AREAKIT OFF AREA OFFICE AREA WAITING RM KIT OFF AREA WOMEN MEN WAITING RM WAITING RM OFFICE AREA BREAK RM KIT KIT OFF AREA Balcony OFFICE STORAGE Balcony CONF RM TEL/COMM/HVAC/STRGTEL/COMM 307-MEZZ 302-MEZZ 318-MEZZ 321-MEZZ 310-MEZZ 312-MEZZ304-MEZZ CONF RM CONF RM TEL/COMM BREAK RM TEL/COMM 304A/306 304 305 307 302 316 310 314 318 312 312A 320 321 DN DN DN DN UP UP UP To Mezz UP UP DN DN DN DNDN UP UP UP DN DN UP UP DN DN DN UP UP DN DN DNDNDNDN DN UP To Mezz Balcony To Mezz UP To Mezz To Mezz UPTo Mezz To Mezz UP To Mezz UP To Mezz To Mezz To Mezz Balcony Balcony Attic Attic Attic OFF AREA OFFICE O To B Void 301-BALCONY 302-BALCONY 318-BALCONY 321-BALCONY308-MEZZ 301 308 308-BALCONY Balcony Balcony BALC-1 BALC-2 BALC-3 20 SCALE 150 5 10 353025 40 PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved Survey Accuracy: +/-%0.09 (As Measured: June 2017) (Last Updated: November 2017) THIRD FLOOR Attic:54 s.f. Exterior Area: 11 s.f. Exterior Area: 22 s.f. Attic:49 s.f. Stair:118 s.f.Stair:115 s.f. Balcony: 35 s.f. Balcony: 11 s.f. Balcony: 23 s.f.Balcony: 22 s.f.Exterior Area: 10 s.f. Exterior Area: 42 s.f. LEASE PLAN Attic:79 s.f. Balcony: 35 s.f. AREAS COMPUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI/BOMA (Z65.1) 2017 OFFICE STANDARD, METHOD A (Multiple Load Factors Method). PAGE 9 DN DN DN DN UP UP UP To Mezz UP UP DN DN DN DNDN UP UP UP DN DN UP UP DN DN DN UP UP DN DN DNDNDNDN DN UP To Mezz To Mezz UP To Mezz To Mezz UPTo Mezz To Mezz UP To Mezz UPTo Mezz To Mezz To Mezz 50 51 52 53 5455 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 05 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 7 42 43 4446 45 47 PHOTO KEYMAP PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved (As Measured: June 2017) THIRD FLOOR PAGE 10 ELEV RM JAN RM Elec Rm Bldg Strg Parking Garage 13'-2" 7'-9" UP SCALE 0 5 10 15 20 FLOOR PLAN Survey Accuracy: +/-%0.09 Note: All dimensions shown are rounded to the nearest inch, for informational purposes only. All measurements are recorded to 1/8" accuracy as documented in the final CAD drawing supplied. PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA (As Measured: June 2017) LOWER LEVEL TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved *Measured Area: 676 s.f. Parking Area: 6,161s.f. *Measured Area represents the footprint of the floor, and is used solely for billing purposes. It is NOT to be used for leasing purposes. PAGE 11 ELEV RM JAN RM Elec Rm Bldg Strg Parking Garage UP SCALE 0 5 10 15 20 LEASE PLAN Survey Accuracy: +/-%0.09 PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved (As Measured: June 2017) (Last Updated: November 2017) LOWER LEVEL AREAS COMPUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI/BOMA (Z65.1) 2017 OFFICE STANDARD, METHOD A (Multiple Load Factors Method). FLOOR SUMMARY SQ.FT. Total Rentable 0 Total Occupant Storage 0 Total Usable 0 Total Tenant 0 Total Ancillary 0 Total Occupant 0 Load Factor 0.0000 Capped Load Factor 0.0000 Floor Service 0 Building Service 605 Inter-Building Service 0 Building Amenity 0 Inter-Building Amenity 0 Total Vertical Penetration 0 Total Unenclosed Covered Gallery 0 Total Parking 0 PAGE 12 ELEV RM JAN RM Elec Rm Bldg Strg Parking Garage 13'-2" 7'-9" UP UP PARKING 17'-10"27'-0"27'-0"26'-9" 17'-11" 27'-0" 18'-0" 98'-7" 62'-11" SCALE 0 5 10 15 20 PARKING PLAN Survey Accuracy: +/-%0.09 Note: All dimensions shown are rounded to the nearest inch, for informational purposes only. All measurements are recorded to 1/8" accuracy as documented in the final CAD drawing supplied. PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA (As Measured: June 2017) (Last Updated: July 2017) LOWER LEVEL TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved PAGE 13 UP UP PHOTO KEYMAP PREPARED FOR: 2200 Associates, LLC 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy Hermosa Beach, CA Tel (310) 781-8264 2200 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA (As Measured: June 2017) (Last Updated: July 2017) LOWER LEVEL TEL: (888) 393-6655 FILE: 17-280 LASERTECH® is a registered US trademark of Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd. Copyright 1998 Lasertech® Floorplans Ltd., All Rights Reserved 50 48 49 PAGE 14 ATTACHMENT 3 N:\4000\2184010 - 2200 PCH, Hermosa Beach\4010-ltr 10-19-18.docx October 19, 2018 Ms. Sarah Chionis Mar Ventures, Inc. 721 N. Douglas Street El Segundo, CA 90245 LLG Reference: 2.18.4010.1 Subject: Parking Study for 2200 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach, California Dear Ms. Chionis: As requested, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this parking study for the 2200 Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) building located in the City of Hermosa Beach. The existing building is 27,406 square feet (SF) in size, consisting of 18,217 SF of general office, 1,007 SF of massage therapist/acupuncture uses, a 1,135-SF wellness center, and 7,047 SF of therapist offices. This study was conducted to assess the feasibility of increasing medical office uses within the 2200 PCH Building by converting from existing general office space. In addition to the existing land use mix, two future development scenarios were evaluated, with each tabulation incrementally adding more medical office uses by reducing general office uses in the 2200 PCH Building. The existing on-site supply for 2200 PCH totals 85 spaces, consisting of 46 spaces in a gated parking garage for tenants, 19 spaces on a visitor parking lot, 18 spaces on a subterranean level below the visitor parking lot, and 2 spaces in tandem on one of the project driveways. In addition, this study accounts for up to 40 spaces in the adjoining Hope Chapel parking structure that the 2200 PCH Building may use from 7:00 AM until 6:00 PM on Monday through Friday (not on Saturday or Sunday). The total existing parking supply for 2200 PCH is therefore 125 spaces (85 on site, plus 40 off site/at Hope Chapel). Briefly, our findings indicate that the City Code-based parking requirements for the existing land use mix, and development Scenario 1, would be adequately served by 2200 PCH’s current supply of 125 spaces. The City Code-based requirements under development Scenario 2 would exceed the 125-space supply by 12 spaces. Taking into account the empirical parking needs for 2200 PCH (based on actual parking counts conducted in July 2018), the existing land use mix, and each of the two future Scenarios 1 and 2 would be adequately served by the 125-space supply for the 2200 PCH Building. Ms. Sarah Chionis October 19, 2018 Page 2 N:\4000\2184010 - 2200 PCH, Hermosa Beach\4010-ltr 10-19-18.docx PROJECT DESCRIPTION Table 1 presents the existing development summary, as well as two future scenarios for the 2200 PCH Building, with each tabulation incrementally adding more medical office by reducing general office uses in the 2200 PCH Building. The following presents a land use breakdown for the existing and future scenarios: Land Use Existing Scenario 1 Scenario 2 General Office 66% 36% 0% Massage Therapist & Acupuncture 4% 4% 0% Wellness Center 4% 4% 0% Therapist Office 26% 26% 26% Medical Office 0% 30% 74% PROJECT CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENTS The lower portion of Table 1 presents the City Code parking calculations for the existing and future scenarios for the 2200 PCH Building, based on the application of City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code requirements outlined in Chapter 17.44 – Off Street Parking. Under the existing land use mix, the City Code requirement totals 117 spaces, which corresponds to a Code-based surplus of 8 spaces when compared against the total supply of 125 spaces for the 2200 PCH Building. The City Code requirement for Scenario 1 totals 125 spaces, which would exactly match the 125-space total supply. The City Code requirement for Scenario 2 totals 137 spaces. Compared against the 125-space supply, the 137-space Code requirement would result in a Code-based deficiency of 12 spaces. EXISTING PARKING CONDITIONS Parking demand surveys were conducted on Wednesday, July 25, 2018, and Saturday, July 27, 2018, to determine the existing parking needs of the existing tenants at 2200 PCH Building. It should be noted that the Building was at 100% tenancy (i.e., fully occupied) when the parking demand counts were performed. The parking utilization survey results for weekday and Saturday conditions are summarized in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Ms. Sarah Chionis October 19, 2018 Page 3 N:\4000\2184010 - 2200 PCH, Hermosa Beach\4010-ltr 10-19-18.docx The left-hand portion (in yellow) of Tables 2 and 3 present a comparison of observed demand against supply focused to the 85 on-site spaces in Zones 1 through 4 at 2200 PCH. The right-hand portion (in green) of Tables 2 and 3 then adds the demand observed in the adjoining 125-space parking structure owned by Hope Chapel (categorized by the 24 spaces located closest to 2200 PCH, and the remainder of 101 spaces). The right-hand columns (in blue) of Tables 2 and 3 report the totals for 2200 PCH and Hope Chapel’s parking structure. As indicated on Table 2, the weekday peak demand observed for 2200 PCH was 41 spaces (at 3:00 PM). Comparing this 41-space demand against the on-site supply of 85 spaces for 2200 PCH results in an existing, actual/operational surplus of 44 spaces. Surpluses are greater during all other hours of the weekday. Based on this, the current parking needs of the 2200 PCH Building are fully met by spaces on site, without having to rely on the use of off-site parking spaces (i.e., 40 spaces in the adjoining Hope Chapel parking structure). Under weekday conditions presented on Table 2, the Hope Chapel parking structure has an existing peak demand of 95 spaces (at 11:00 AM), which corresponds to a surplus of 30 spaces compared to Hope Chapel’s 125-space supply in the structure. The total weekday peak demand for 2200 PCH and the Hope Chapel structure is 127 spaces (at 11:00 AM). Comparing against the total supply of 210 spaces, the 127- space peak demand results in a surplus 83 spaces. Table 3 indicates that parking demand on a Saturday are significantly less than weekday conditions for both the 2200 PCH Building and the Hope Chapel parking structure, resulting in an actual surplus of 182 spaces at the minimum. FUTURE PARKING DEMAND Starting with the observed demand in the 85-space on-site supply for 2200 PCH (based on the July 25, 2018 parking demand counts), then accounting for the future conversion from existing general office to future medical office, Tables 4 and 5 were developed to identify future surplus or deficiency. The middle portion of each table reports parking needs for specific suites in the 2200 PCH Building, as its current use as general office, then as future medical office. The demand values reported under these column headings were estimated based upon the application of City Code parking ratios for general office (4 spaces per 1,000 SF) and medical office (5 spaces per 1,000 SF), and the hourly demand profiles from the Urban Land Institute’s (ULI’s) Shared Parking (Second Edition) publication. The hourly demand values for the general office to be replaced are subtractive, and those in the future medical office category are additive. Ms. Sarah Chionis October 19, 2018 Page 4 N:\4000\2184010 - 2200 PCH, Hermosa Beach\4010-ltr 10-19-18.docx Table 4 indicates that the weekday peak demand under development Scenario 1 would be 61 spaces (at 11:00 AM). Comparing this 61-space demand against the 125-space supply available for use by 2200 PCH results in a future surplus of 64 spaces. Table 5 indicates that the weekday peak demand under development Scenario 2 would be 86 spaces (at 5:00 PM). Comparing this 86-space demand against the 125-space supply available for use by 2200 PCH yields in a future surplus of 39 spaces. The 39-space surplus under Scenario 2 is a conservative estimate because it was derived from the application of City Code ratios. The actual parking requirements for medical offices have been found to be less than the City Code requirement of 5 spaces per 1,000 SF. This aspect is illustrated by actual parking demand compilations from other sources, and detailed study of the actual parking demands of similar sites. Parking Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)1 as well as articles published in ITE Journal provide additional sources for parking ratio information. “Land Use 720: Medical-Dental Office Building” of Parking Generation covered 18 sites that resulted in an average parking demand ratio of 3.53 spaces/1,000 SF, with an 85th percentile value of 4.30 spaces/1,000 SF. Further, an ITE Journal article on medical office buildings2 concluded that 4.5 parking spaces/1,000 SF should be provided for medical office buildings. Other sources for medical office parking ratios come from actual experience at equivalent sites, or in the case of medical office uses, overall medical center sites where the medical office parking needs were isolated from the total medical center parking demand by detailed field study and analysis. One such study was that for the Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Medical Center in Santa Clarita. A 2007 study by LLG (with final report dated May 19, 2008) isolated the parking needs for approximately 95,000 SF of existing medical office space at 4.64 spaces/1,000 SF. In addition, other jurisdictions in Los Angeles County and that are near the City of Hermosa Beach all have code parking ratios for medical office buildings that are less, as follows:  Redondo Beach (for chiropractic, physical therapy, psychotherapy): 3.33 spaces per 1,000 SF  Rancho Palos Verdes: 4 spaces per 1,000 SF  Santa Monica: 4 spaces per 1,000 SF  Hawthorne: 3.33 spaces per 1,000 SF  Culver City: 2.86 spaces per 1,000 SF 1 4th Edition, Washington, DC, 2010. 2 “Parking Requirements for Medical Office Buildings”, John W. Dorsett and Mark J. Lukasik, ITE Journal, August 2007 Ms. Sarah Chionis October 19, 2018 Page 5 N:\4000\2184010 - 2200 PCH, Hermosa Beach\4010-ltr 10-19-18.docx Based on the above, we conclude that taking into account the empirical parking needs for 2200 PCH (based on actual parking counts conducted in July 2018), the existing land use mix, and each of the two future Scenarios 1 and 2 would be adequately served by the 125-space supply for the 2200 PCH Building. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this analysis. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to call me at (949) 825-6175. Sincerely, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Trissa (de Jesus) Allen, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer Suite Tenant101 Administrative Office Newspaper 683683683683 683 683102 Administrative Office for Tutoring 428428428428 428 428103 Insurance 590590590590 590 590200 Attorney 337337337337 337 337201 Therapist 849849849849849849203 Administrative Office for Entertainment 1,2601,2601,2601,260 1,260 1,260204 Therapist 225225225225225225205 Massage Therapist 288288288288 288 288206 Social Worker 257257257257257257207 Therapist 751751751751751751209 Therapist 549549549549549549210 Therapist 1,1301,1301,1301,1301,1301,130212 Therapist 342342342342342342214 Acupuncturist 719719719719 719 719215 Therapist 695695695695695695217 Wellness Center 1,1351,1351,1351,135 1,135 1,135218 Therapist 862862862862862862219 Therapist 643643643643643643220 Accountant 499499499499 499 499301 Administrative Office for Event Planning 1,1391,1391,1391,139 1,139 1,139302 Attorney 1,7431,743 1,743 1,743 1,743 1,743304 Administrative Office for Event Planning 662662662662 662 662305 Real Estate Investment 1,8701,870 1,870 1,870 1,870 1,870307 Administrative Office for Event Planning 1,2431,2431,2431,243 1,243 1,243308 Vacant (presumed general office) 1,1401,1401,1401,140 1,140 1,140310 Real Estate 718718718718 718 718312 Social Worker/Attorney 1,4941,494 1,494 1,494 1,494 1,494316 Commercial Broker 1,5271,527 1,527 1,527 1,527 1,527317 Administrative Office for Event Planning 830830830830 830 830314/318 Attorney 1,5181,518 1,518 1,518 1,518 1,518320 Forensic Accountant 279279279279 279 279205B Therapist 256256256256256256304A Therapist 745745745745745745PROJECT TOTAL 18,217 1,007 1,135 7,047 0 27,406 10,065 1,007 1,135 7,047 8,152 27,406 0 0 0 7,047 20,359 27,406Land Use % Breakdown 66% 4% 4% 26% 0% - 36% 4% 4% 26% 30% - 0% 0% 0% 26% 74% - CITY CODE PARKING RATIOS [a]1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space - 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space - 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space -per per per per per per per per per per per per per per per250 SF 250 SF 250 SF 200 SF 200 SF 250 SF 250 SF 250 SF 200 SF 200 SF 250 SF 250 SF 250 SF 200 SF 200 SF[b] [c] [d] [b] [c] [d] [b] [c] [d] CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS 73 4 5 35 0 117 40 4 5 35 41 125 0 0 0 35 102 137 EXISTING PARKING SUPPLY (spaces)On-Site (w/out Hope Chapel Spaces) - - - - - 85 - - - - - 85 - - - - - 85On-Site + 40 Hope Chapel Spaces - - - - - 125 - - - - - 125 - - - - - 125 CODE PARKING SURPLUS OR (DEFICIENCY) (Supply minus Code Requirement)On-Site (w/out Hope Chapel Spaces) - - - - -(32)-----(40)-----(52)On-Site + 40 Hope Chapel Spaces - - - - - 8 - - - - - 0 - - - - -(12)Notes:[a] Source: City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.44 - Off-Street Parking.[b] City Code does not provide parking ratios for massage therapists and acupuncturists. Based on LLG's prior parking studies for similar facilities, an empirical parking ratio of 1 space per 250 SF was applied.[c] City Code parking ratio for health and fitness centers was applied.[d] Therapist was presumed to provide outpatient care services and able to prescribe medication. City Code parking ratio for medical office was applied.TABLE 1PROJECT DEVELOPMENT TABULATION & CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS2200 PCH, HERMOSA BEACHExisting GFA (SF) Scenario 1: Future GFA (SF) Scenario 2: Future GFA (SF)General OfficeMassage Therapist, AcupunctureWellness Center TherapistMedical Office TOTALGeneral OfficeMassage Therapist, AcupunctureWellness Center TherapistMedical Office TOTAL TherapistMedical Office TOTALGeneral OfficeMassage Therapist, AcupunctureWellness Center Time of DayDemand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus7:00 AM 8 38 0 19 0 18 0 2 8 77 2 22 14 87 16 109 24 1868:00 AM 9 37 1 18 2 16 0 2 12 73 2 22 19 82 21 104 33 1779:00 AM 10 36 3 16 7 11 0 2 20 65 3 21 28 73 31 94 51 15910:00 AM 12 34 8 11 11 7 0 2 31 54 14 10 76 25 90 35 121 8911:00 AM13 33 9 10 9 9 1 1 32 5319 5 76 25 95 30 127 8312:00 PM 14 32 11 8 9 9 1 1 35 50 12 12 52 49 64 61 99 1111:00 PM 14 32 13 6 7 11 1 1 35 50 8 16 32 69 40 85 75 1352:00 PM 16 30 12 7 9 9 0 2 37 48 8 16 31 70 39 86 76 1343:00 PM 20 26 10 9 11 7 0 2 41 447 1728733590761344:00 PM 16 30 11 8 9 9 0 2 36 49 6 18 23 78 29 96 65 1455:00 PM 17 29 11 8 7 11 0 2 35 50 2 22 17 84 19 106 54 1566:00 PM 10 36 7 12 4 14 0 2 21 64 2 22 22 79 24 101 45 1657:00 PM 5 41 4 15 0 18 0 2 9 76 1 23 17 84 18 107 27 1838:00 PM 4 42 4 15 0 18 0 2 8 77 0 24 10 91 10 115 18 1929:00 PM 2 44 4 15 0 18 0 2 6 79 0 24 7 94 7 118 13 197OBSERVED PEAK DEMAND (2200 PCH): 41 OBSERVED PEAK DEMAND (Hope Ch.): 95PARKING SUPPLY: 85 PARKING SUPPLY: 125EXISTING SURPLUS OR DEFICIENCY (-):44EXISTING SURPLUS OR DEFICIENCY (-):30Supply = 24 Sp. Supply = 101 Sp. Supply = 125 Sp.TABLE 2EXISTING WEEKDAY PARKING DEMAND(per Wednesday, 7/25/18 survey)2200 PCH, Hermosa BeachHope Chapel Parking StructureSpaces Closest Remaining Spc. Total in Hopeto 2200 PCH in Structure Chapel Str.Gated Tenant Visitor LotSupply = 46 Sp. Supply = 19 Sp.Zone 1Zone 2Zone 3Tenant below Z2Supply = 18 Sp.Zone 4Tandem on DwySupply = 2 Sp.Supply = 210 Sp.TOTAL (2200 PCH + Hope Chapel Structure)2200 PCH On-site ParkingSupply = 85 Sp.Zones 1 thru 4Total Time of DayDemand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus Demand Surplus9:00 AM 3 43 1 18 0 18 0 2 4 81 1 23 10 91 11 114 15 19510:00 AM 3 43 7 12 0 18 0 2 10 75 1 23 17 84 18 107 28 18211:00 AM 3 43 7 12 0 18 0 2 10 751 23 13 88 14 111 24 18612:00 PM 3 43 4 15 2 16 0 2 9 76 1 23 3 98 4 121 13 1971:00 PM 3 43 4 15 2 16 0 2 9 76 1 23 2 99 3 122 12 1982:00 PM 3 43 3 16 1 17 0 2 7 78 1 23 2 99 3 122 10 2003:00 PM 3 43 0 19 1 17 0 2 4 81 0 24 4 97 4 121 8 2024:00 PM 3 43 0 19 1 17 0 2 4 81 0 24 4 97 4 121 8 2025:00 PM 3 43 0 19 1 17 0 2 4 81 0 24 6 95 6 119 10 200OBSERVED PEAK DEMAND (2200 PCH): 10 OBSERVED PEAK DEMAND (Hope Ch.): 18PARKING SUPPLY: 85 PARKING SUPPLY: 125EXISTING SURPLUS OR DEFICIENCY (-):75EXISTING SURPLUS OR DEFICIENCY (-):107TABLE 3EXISTING SATURDAY PARKING DEMAND(per Saturday, 7/28/18 survey)2200 PCH, Hermosa Beach2200 PCH On-site Parking Hope Chapel Parking StructureTOTAL (2200 PCH + Hope Chapel Structure)Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Total Spaces Closest Remaining Spc. Total in HopeGated Tenant Visitor Lot Tenant below Z2 Tandem on Dwy Zones 1 thru 4 to 2200 PCH in StructureSupply = 210 Sp.Chapel Str.Supply = 46 Sp. Supply = 19 Sp. Supply = 18 Sp. Supply = 2 Sp. Supply = 85 Sp. Supply = 24 Sp. Supply = 101 Sp. Supply = 125 Sp. TABLE 4 SCENARIO 1 WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS 2200 PCH, Hermosa Beach Land Use Size (8.152)KSF 8.152 KSF Surplus or Pkg Rate 4.00 /KSF 5.00 /KSF Deficiency Gross (33)Spc. 41 Spc. Total based on Spaces Shared 125-space Number of Number of Parking Total Existing Time of Day Spaces Spaces Demand Supply 6:00 AM -- -- 7:00 AM 1 124 8:00 AM 22 103 9:00 AM 30 95 10:00 AM 53 72 11:00 AM 61 64 12:00 PM 42 83 1:00 PM 53 72 2:00 PM 53 72 3:00 PM 58 67 4:00 PM 53 72 5:00 PM 58 67 6:00 PM 42 83 7:00 PM 19 106 8:00 PM 12 113 9:00 PM 5 120 10:00 PM -- -- 11:00 PM -- -- 12:00 AM -- -- PEAK PARKING DEMAND: 61 PARKING SUPPLY (85 on site + 40 in Hope Chapel Structure): 125 SURPLUS OR (DEFICIENCY):64 Note: [a] Demand for 2200 PCH presumed to include spaces occupied in the Hope Chapel structure that are located closest to the 2200 PCH pedestrian access. --(1)0 Existing Parking Demand (per Wednesday, 7/25/18 survey) [a] Scenario 1: General Office to be removed Scenario 1: Future Medical Office Number of Spaces 10 (9)0 14 (24)32 23 (31)38 45 (33)41 51 (31)41 47 (27)22 43 (28)38 45 (33)41 48 (31)41 42 (27)38 37 (15)36 23 (8)27 10 (3)12 8 (2)6 6 (1)0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 TABLE 5 SCENARIO 2 WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS 2200 PCH, Hermosa Beach Land Use Size (20.359)KSF 20.359 KSF Surplus or Pkg Rate 4.00 /KSF 5.00 /KSF Deficiency Gross (81)Spc. 102 Spc. Total based on Spaces Shared 125-space Number of Number of Parking Total Existing Time of Day Spaces Spaces Demand Supply 6:00 AM -- -- 7:00 AM (13)138 8:00 AM 38 87 9:00 AM 43 82 10:00 AM 66 59 11:00 AM 75 50 12:00 PM 32 93 1:00 PM 67 58 2:00 PM 66 59 3:00 PM 72 53 4:00 PM 68 57 5:00 PM 86 39 6:00 PM 73 52 7:00 PM 32 93 8:00 PM 18 107 9:00 PM 4 121 10:00 PM -- -- 11:00 PM -- -- 12:00 AM -- -- PEAK PARKING DEMAND: 86 PARKING SUPPLY (85 on site + 40 in Hope Chapel Structure): 125 SURPLUS OR (DEFICIENCY):39 Note: [a] Demand for 2200 PCH presumed to include spaces occupied in the Hope Chapel structure that are located closest to the 2200 PCH pedestrian access. --(2)0 Existing Parking Demand (per Wednesday, 7/25/18 survey) [a] Scenario 2: General Office to be removed Scenario 2: Future Medical Office Number of Spaces 10 (23)0 14 (57)81 23 (75)95 45 (81)102 51 (78)102 47 (69)54 43 (71)95 45 (81)102 48 (78)102 42 (69)95 37 (39)88 23 (19)69 10 (8)30 8 (5)15 6 (2)0 --(1)0 -- 0 0 -- 0 0 ATTACHMENT 4 From:Brandon Straus To:joey.iside@hopechapel.org Subject:Notice of Application for Parking Plan Approval by the City of Hermosa Beach Date:Wednesday, September 23, 2020 9:37:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Joey Iside Operations Manager Hope Chapel 2420 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. Iside: I represent 2200 Associates, LLC, the owners of 2200 Pacific Coast Highway (PCH), Hermosa Beach, 90254. There is currently in effect a recorded reciprocal parking easement between 2200 PCH and 2420 PCH, which is owned by International Church of the Four Square Gospel (Hope Chapel). The parking easement permits 2200 PCH to use up to 40 parking stalls in the southern half of the parking lot at 2420 PCH on Mondays through Fridays, from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm. The easement permits 2420 PCH to use up to 40 parking stalls at 2200 PCH from 6:00 PM on Fridays to 12:00 AM on Sundays. 2200 Associates, LLC, has applied to the City of Hermosa Beach (City) for approval of a Parking Plan governing the site at 2200 PCH. The application constitutes a request for the City to formally recognize use of the shared parking by 2200 PCH on the lot at 2420 PCH, as set forth in the recorded parking easement. The purpose of this email is to obtain affirmative confirmation that the owner of 2420 PCH is aware of the pending Parking Plan application. Therefore, I would greatly appreciate if you would respond to this message, acknowledging receipt. This will not be the only notice that is provided. Prior to any hearing on the Parking Plan, properties within 500 feet of 2200 PCH will receive notice from the City of the hearing. I look forward to hearing from you. Best Regards, Brandon Straus 2447 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 200 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 372-8433 Email: brandon@esrour.com www.srourandassociates.com ATTACHMENT 5 ATTACHMENT 6 2200 Pacific Coast Highway Tenant Roster No. of Tenant Spaces Unit No. Current Tenant Roster Medical Use (S.F.) Non-Medical Use (S.F.) Floor Plan Page No. 1 101 Easy Reader 662.6 2 2 102 Sepideh Bassi 445.7 2 3 103 Vacant – Previously General Office 629.3 2 Restroom 137 2 4 200 Garee Gasperian 354.2 6 5 201 Cheryl Morrow and Diana Lipson-Burge 902.9 6 6 203 Hirsch Entertainment Group 1183.5 6 7 204 Behrens Racing 252 6 8 205A Christopher O'Hara 316.4 6 9 205B Ann Christensen and Naomi Resnik 257.8 6 10 206 Leah Niehaus 254.7 6 11 207 Bobbie Lesser, Robert Rutman, and Karin Tamura 757.5 6 12 209 Kate Mosier and Jennifer Jordan 621.2 6 13 210 Megan McCormick and Maureen Jennings 1073.9 6 14 212 Mary Klem and Bill Klem 378.5 6 15 214 Tina Hartney, Kamala Horwitz and Carol Kole 764.2 6 16 215 Kelly Waggoner and Michele Blume 753.9 6 17 217 Wellness Institute of Southern California 1147.8 6 18 218 Alann Dingle, Jacqueline Mills, and Elizabeth Cowart 855.1 6 19 219 Christopher Stretch, Danielle Borah and Allen Berger 617.7 6 20 220 Oliver & Oliver Associates 523.3 6 Restroom approx. 250 6 21 301 Vacant – Previously PHR Management 1181.6 9 22 302 Law Offices (Barrington/Poliner, Ronnie) 1646.9 9 23 304 Quartz Events 759.3 9 24 304A/306 Recovery Now/Positive Counseling Center 827.5 9 25 305 CAP Investment Properties 2110.0 9 26 307 Quartz Events 1267.3 9 27 308 Vacant – Previously Kentwood Bancorp. 1253.7 9 28 310 Coldwell Banker 959.9 9 29 312 Dawn Strachan, CEA, CDFA 1289.4 9 30 312A Jon Kramer and Kim Davidson 246.9 9 31 314 Chatten-Brown & Carstens 318.4 9 32 316 Highland Partners 1653.6 9 33 317 Total Success Staffing Services 812.8 9 34 318 Chatten-Brown & Carstens 1303.9 9 35 320 Salomon Forensics 317.8 9 Restroom approx. 250 9 Total = 36 Total S.F. = 29,338 2,767 26,571 ATTACHMENT 7 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT | PLANNING DIVISION 1315 VALLEY DRIVE | HERMOSA BEACH | CA 90254 FOR QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT PLANNING@HERMOSABEACH.GOV OR CALL (310) 318-0242 Office Hours: Monday to Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. UNIVERSAL PLANNING APPLICATION The Universal Planning application is intended for all permits issued by the Planning Division. The submittal requirements contained herein are a centralized list of all application components required by the City of Hermosa Beach Planning Division; however, the City may require additional information to be submitted. IMPORTANT NOTICE: COMPLETE AND ACCURATE SUBMITTALS ARE REQUIRED. PRIOR TO ACCEPTING AN APPLICATION FOR REVIEW, YOU MUST MEET WITH A PLANNER AT THE COUNTER TO DETERMINE IF THE APPLICATION IS ACCEPTABLE TO CONDUCT REVIEW. IF THE APPLICATION IS MISSING REQUIRED INFORMATION THEN THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. TO DETERMINE HOURS OF OPERATION OF THE COUNTER, CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT (310) 318-0242, MONDAY – THURSDAY, 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM. Once the application is accepted for review, it will be assigned to a Planner. The Planner will review the application within 30-days of acceptance to determine if the application is complete. During the initial 30-day review period, the Planner may schedule a site inspection, which may include an interior inspection. If the application is incomplete, the Planner will provide you with a list of missing/incomplete information needed to deem the application complete. This packet includes the following: PART I: PLANNING APPLICATION PART II: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM PART III: PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE PART IV: SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS PART V: REQUIRED NUMBER OF SUBMITTAL ITEMS PART VI: SAMPLE PLANS NON-STANDARD APPLICATIONS The following applications have their own submittal requirements. Please click on the links below or visit https://www.hermosabeach.gov/our-government/community-development/applications-forms- handouts for the submittal requirements for the following application types: •Preliminary Housing Project (SB 330) •Sign Permit (Permanent & Temporary) •Temporary Minor Special Event Permit •Short-Term Vacation Rentals •Portable A-frame Sign Permit •Limited Live Entertainment Permit •Historic Landmark Nomination Application* (This item requires both this application and the supplemental form) For more information on the process, call (310) 318-0242, Monday – Thursday, 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM, to speak to a Planner. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT | PLANNING DIVISION 1315 VALLEY DRIVE | HERMOSA BEACH | CA 90254 FOR QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT PLANNING@HERMOSABEACH.GOV OR CALL (310) 318-0242 Office Hours: Monday to Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. PART I: PLANNING APPLICATION Please note that all information submitted becomes public record SECTION A: PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: SITE ADDRESS/LOCATION: ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER:— — BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SECTION B: APPLICANT NAME: COMPANY: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: EMAIL: PHONE: MOBILE PHONE: SECTION C: CONTACT Check this box if contact is same as applicant and skip to Section IV NAME: COMPANY: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: EMAIL: PHONE: MOBILE PHONE: This box to be completed by City Staff only Date Submitted: Case Number: 4 1 8 4 0 1 4 0 3 8 Application for parking plan approval and acknowledgement of 4 existing tandem parking spaces 2200 Associates, LLC 1528 6th Street, Suite 100, Santa Monica, CA 90401 bbarnes@vestra.com 310-400-6579 Brandon Straus Srour & Associates 2447 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 200 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Brandon@esrour.com 310-372-8433 to 0 7 2 2200 Associates, LLC 3 SECTION D: PROPERTY OWNER NAME: COMPANY: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: EMAIL: PHONE: MOBILE PHONE: SECTION E: APPLICATION(S) (select all that apply) ☐Amendment to Planning Entitlement ☐Appeal to the Planning Commission ☐Conditional Use Permit ☐Condominium ☐CC&R's Review ☐Extension of Time for Planning Entitlement ☐Final Map ☐General Plan Amendment ☐Height Limit Exception ☐Minor Historic Review/Cert. of Appropriateness ☐Major Historic Review/Cert. of Appropriateness ☐Historic Landmark Nomination ☐Limited Outdoor Seating ☐Lot Line Adjustment ☐Mural Review ☐Parking Plan ☐Planning Commission Interpretation ☐Precise Development Plan ☐Sign Variance ☐Similar Use Determination ☐Slope/Grade Height Determination ☐Tentative Map ☐Zoning Code Text Amendment ☐Variance ☐Zone Change ☐Categorical Exemption ☐Negative Declaration / Initial Study ☐Environmental Impact Report Refer to the Planning Fee Schedule (pages 10 and 11) for current application fees. Be advised, multiple fees may apply to your application (e.g. a CUP application may include a CUP fee, categorical exemption fee, public noticing fee(s), and technology fee). SECTION F: CERTIFICATION 1.I certify that to, the best of my knowledge, the information in this application and all plans and submittals are true, accurate and correct; this application is made with my consent; and misrepresentation of factual information may invalidate development entitlements granted by the City. 2.I understand that work pertaining to the project shall not begin prior to final City approval. 'Final City approval' means approval by the final decision-making authority on the application, following any appeal period set forth in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Please contact the Community Development Department at (310) 318-0242 or City Clerk’s office at (310) 318-0239 with any questions on the approval process. 3.I understand that property development is complex and responsibility for understanding and abiding by all legal requirements pertaining to this project lies with myself, the property owner and project developers. I understand that unknown conditions and requirements may arise during the development process, which may result in unanticipated time, cost, requirements, or project denial. I understand that my project may be subject to requirements of other City departments, such as the Public Works or Los Angeles County Fire Departments and have inquired about them, or other local, state or federal, or utility company requirements. 4.I hereby authorize employees of the City of Hermosa Beach to enter upon the subject property, as necessary to enable the City to process this application and upon providing reasonable notice, to inspect the premises and post public hearing notices. 5.I understand that any decision of the Planning Commission may be reviewed by the City Council and some applications are subject to appeal. Appeals must be filed in writing with the City Clerk within ten calendar days from the date of the subsequent City Council meeting. Same as Applicant PART II: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM 1. Describe the project site, as it currently exists, including size of buildings and improvements, existing uses, number of parking spaces, square footage of landscaping etc. (use separate sheet if necessary) Existing Proposed 2. What is the General Plan Land Use Designation for the site? 3. What is the Zoning for the Site? 4. Is the site in the Coastal Zone?Yes: No: 5.Will the project be developed or constructed in phases? If yes, include a phasing plan in the detail project description.Yes: No: 6. Are you proposing any other development, uses, or alterations of the site that are not included in this application?Yes: No: 7.Has the project or site received previous or other approvals? (If so, an amendment may be required.)Yes: No: 8.Is any part of the site subject to any lease, agreement, covenant, association, easement, or other encumbrance?Yes: No: 9.Have you conducted any pre-submittal community outreach? If yes, please include a narrative of the results of the outreach, including any opposition. Yes: No: 10.Describe adjacent land uses, including business names: To North: To South: To East: To West: 11.Lot coverage and surfaces: Type Existing (sq ft) Proposed (sq ft) Net Change (sq ft) Buildings Lot coverage* Paved area Landscaped area Unimproved area Pervious surfaces *Lot coverage: area of lot covered by foundations of all buildings and structures, cantilevers projecting from a building, decks and stairs >30" above grade. Excluded: Architectural projections, eaves, unenclosed balconies open on > 2 sides including portions under another balcony projecting <5' from a building face; nonstructural stairs, patios, walkways and planters establishing finish grade; fences and walls. (Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 17.04 ) 12.Will any buildings be demolished? If yes, complete 13a and 13b.Yes: No: 12a. Number of buildings to be demolished? 12b. Gross floor area of buildings to be demolished. 13.Will any dwelling units be demolished? C and 14b.Yes: No: Please see attached project description. C-3 C-3 Commercial Commerical X X X X X X C-3 R-1 and R-2 SPA-8 R-1 X X 6 29,338 Approx. 23,850 0 0 Approx. 2,468 Approx 9620 Approx. 962 29,338 Approx. 23,850 Approx. 2,468 Approx 962 0 Approx. 962 0 00 0 7 13a. Number of dwelling units currently on property. 13b. number of dwelling units to be demolished. 14.Are any temporary uses or structures proposed?Yes: No: 15.Will fences, walls /retaining walls, or similar elements be installed or altered?Yes: No: 16.Are any roof decks proposed? If yes, complete 17a.Yes: No: 17a. Size of roof deck 17.Are electrical transformers, fire hydrants, antennae, rooftop elements, solar photovoltaic energy systems, tanks, or similar improvements proposed/required? Yes: No: 18.Will any structure, architectural projection, stairs, decks, utilities, or other elements encroach into a setback as a result of the project?Yes: No: 19.Will any signs be installed or altered in connection with the use or building?Yes: No: 20.Will trash/recycling facilities be installed or altered?Yes: No: 21.Will any part of the project, or its use, encroach on the public right-of-way (during or after construction or operation)?Yes: No: 22.Will exterior lighting on any building or site be installed or altered?Yes: No: 23.Number of Proposed Parking spaces Type Existing Proposed Net Change Required Covered spaces Regular space Compact Disabled Loading/other Guest (residential) 24.Are any parking spaces located offsite or shared with other uses or businesses on the site? If yes, include a narrative in the project description Yes: No: 25.Are any parking spaces located offsite or shared with other uses or businesses on the site? If yes, include a narrative in the project description. Yes: No: 26.Will any driveways or access ways be constructed or altered?Yes: No: 27.Will drainage be altered or increased? If yes, please describe.Yes: No: 28.Is a Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan required? (Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 8.44)Yes: No: 29.Are any trees, unique environmental conditions, or cultural elements located on the site or an adjacent site?Yes: No: 30.Will any trees be removed, or will construction, trenching, construction materials, or vehicles encroach within the drip line of existing trees? Yes: No: 31.Will any vegetation or planters be removed, altered or installed?Yes: No: 32.Is site grading or contouring proposed?Yes: No: Cut (cubic yards): Fill (cubic yards): Cubic yards export: Cubic yards import: Maximum height fill slope (feet): Maximum height cut slope (feet): RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS (Skip to Question 33 if not a residential project) 33.Type of units Type Number of units Bedrooms per unit Unit size (sq ft) - except garages Garage– per unit (sq ft) Total size– all units (sg ft) Single-family Duplex Multi-family Condominiums Accessory or other 1 1 X X X 167 s.f. X X X X X X 62 62 N/A X X X X X X X X X0 0 0 0 0 0 24 24 0 N/A 0 N/A N/A N//A 63 5 2 2 0 8 34.Will affordable or special need housing be provided?Yes: No: 35.Will any amenities be provided?Yes: No: COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, INSTITUTIONAL, OTHER (Skip to Acknowledgements if inapplicable) 36.Provide details on the following criteria: Existing Proposed Days and hours of operation: Shifts per day: Employees on largest shift: Estimated total number of employees: Number of seats (for restaurants, schools, theaters, etc.): 37.Specify any outdoor activities (dining, storage, etc.): 38.Will machinery other than typical office equipment be used? If yes, please describe:Yes: No: 39.Will any flues, filtration systems, ventilation or similar equipment be installed or altered (e.g., affecting air, water, grease or oil trap)? If yes, please describe: Yes: No: 40.Will any hazardous or dangerous materials be used? If yes, please describe:Yes: No: 41. Will the use create any noise or vibration that will heard/felt off the site? If yes, please describe:Yes: No: 42. How is the project consistent with, and meet the goals of, the City’s General Plan? The General Plan can be found at https://www.hermosabeach.gov/our-government/community-development/plan-hermosa. ATTACHMENT 8 2420 PCH Surface Parking Deck on East side of PCH 2420 PCH Enclosed Parking (Easement Spaces in Southern Half of Lot) Pacific Coast Highway ADA ADA ADA (Southerly Half of the Lot) 2420 PCH Parking Lot 120 Spaces Total COMPACT SPACES ATTACHMENT 9 DN DN DN DN DN DN UP 102 UP 101 103 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 26’ aisle width 3 2 1 7 6 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 8 9 19 18 17 4 ADA 30 32 38 37 36 35 34 33 44 43 41 40 39 29 42 31 26 27 28 24 25 45 10 9 8 23 22 11 12 13 15 14 16 17 18 21 19 20 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 18’ 10’ 8.5’ 5 ADA 21’ aisle width 9’ 10 9 8 11 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 16 15 14 13 12 18 17 25’ aisle width 8.3’ 8.3’ 8.3’ 8’ 10’ 16’ 8.5’ 18’ 3 2 1 4 10’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5 ‘8.5 ‘ 8.5 ‘ 8.5’8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5 ‘ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5 88 ’8 18’ 8.5’ 18’ 18’ 18’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.5’ 8.3’ 8.5’ 9’ 9’ 9’ 9’ 9’9’ 9’ 9’ 9’ 9’ 9’ 9’ 9’ 9’9’ 9’ 8.5’ APPLICATION FOR PARKING PLAN APPROVAL 2200 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Applicant: 2200 Associates, LLC 1528 6th Street, Suite 100 Santa Monica, CA 90401 BORDEN AVE. Page 1 East Subterranean Parking Garage West Subterranean Parking GarageSurface Parking Lot/Deck 2200 PCH East (subterranean) parking garage, entering from the South at 21st Street 2200 PCH 4 Surface tandem spaces looking north from 21st Street 2200 PCH East Facade along Borden Street 2200 PCH East (subterranean) parking garage, at midpoint, looking north 2200 PCH West (subterranean) parking garage, looking towards the entrance from PCH 2200 PCH Upper deck/surface parking lot, looking south down PCH 2200 PCH Upper deck/surface parking lot, looking east accross PCH ATTACHMENT 10 Travel Path from 2420 PCH Easement Parking to 2200 PCH 2200 PCH 2420 PCH PCH Looking South (Hope Chapel) 1 Jenner, Suite 160 Irvine, CA 92618 714.899.9039 December 8, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Christy Teague, AICP Senior Planner Community Development Department City of Hermosa Beach FROM: Nicole Jules, PE, Consulting Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Peer Review of 2200 PCH Parking Plan The purpose of this memo is to review and provide comment regarding the proposed parking plan prepared for 2200 Pacific Coast Highway for a proposed conversion of general office use to medical office use by utilizing on-site parking and exercising a shared-use parking strategy with a nearby property to satisfy the HBMC parking requirements. The following documents were reviewed as part of this peer review: • November 17, 2020 Planning Commission Staff Report • Applicant submittal with explanation and LLG October 2018 Parking Study Existing Conditions 2200 Pacific Coast Highway is a 29,338 square foot commercial building consisting of medical and general office uses. The property is located on the north east corner of Pacific Coast Highway at 21st Street. Both Pacific Coast Highway and 21st Street are public streets with on- street public parking and sidewalks. Page 2 of 3 2200 Pacific Coast Highway Parking Study Peer Review The subject location provides 86 on-site parking spaces and 40 offsite shared parking spaces located at 2420 Pacific Coast Highway, for a total of 126 available parking spaces. The off-site shared parking arrangement is established by a reciprocal parking easement between private parties that was recorded with the County on September 10, 2013. Existing Parking Demand: In review of the October 2018 parking study prepared by LLG, inconsistent information was found between the LLG Study, the application and staff’s determination. Of particular disparity is the number of parking spaces reported in the LLG study compared to other documentation submitted and field conditions. In July 2018, a parking demand study was conducted to determine the utilization of existing available parking spaces. While there was no issue with the study outcome, there is inconsistent information regarding the actual number of parking spaces. The table below summarizes the parking space discrepancy. Table 1 Number of Existing Parking Spaces LLG Study Existing ONSITE Gated 46 45 Surface Lot (Visitor) 19 19 Subterranean 18 18 Tandem 2 4 Onsite Sub-total 85 86 OFFSITE 2420 Pacific Coast Hwy 40 40 Total 125 126 While the number of spaces reported in the study was incorrect by one space, the resulting conclusion that there is a surplus of on-site parking during existing conditions is supported. Proposed Parking Requirement The applicant is requesting to increase medical use from 9.3% to 100%. The parking requirements associated with this shift in use is greater than the current use and therefore is subject to greater parking requirements. In accordance with HBMC Section 17.44.210 the net increase in parking spaces required for this shift in use is 27 spaces. With 86 existing spaces Page 3 of 3 2200 Pacific Coast Highway Parking Study Peer Review on site and the available 40 shared-use spaces at 2420 PCH, the required 27 spaces can be met. Parking Requirements for Existing Non-Conforming Buildings HBMC 17.44.210 Required Parking Spaces by Use Use Sq. Ft. Spaces Required Use Sq. Ft. Spaces Required EXISTING PROPOSED Medical 2,756 14 Medical 26,582 133 Non-medical 26,582 106 Non-Medical - -106 Total 29,338 120 Total - +27 Converting the non-medical use (general office) to 100% medical use would require 27 additional parking spaces. Therefore, the code required parking spaces of 27 additional spaces can be satisfied through use of the 40 shared spaces located at 2420 PCH. Proposed Parking Demand The LLG Parking Study conservatively estimated that the proposed project utilizing 100% medical use would result in a surplus of 39 spaces. This conservative estimate was derived based on utilizing City Code parking ratio of 5 spaces per 1,000 SF of medical office space. While this parking ratio is higher than industry standard rates suggested by ITE Parking Generation Manual as well as other nearby municipalities, this conservatively empirical estimate would be sufficiently served by the 126 parking spaces available from onsite and off- site parking. Conclusion A peer review of the proposed parking plan for 2200 Pacific Coast Highway was completed and concludes that the proposed conversion of general office uses to 100 percent medical uses would require 27 additional parking spaces which can be satisfied through use of 40 offsite shared-use parking spaces located at 2420 Pacific Coast Highway and that the parking study prepared for this project conservatively concludes that future parking demand will be adequately accommodated by the existing 86 onsite spaces and 40 offsite shared-use spaces. End of report Public Notice Poster Verification View from Pacific Coast Highway View from 21st Street IMPORTANT PUBLIC NOTICE 2200 Pacific Coast Highway Assessor Parcel Number 4184-014-038 Reconsideration of the December 15, 2020 Planning Commission decision to approve Parking Plan 20-4 request to allow medical clinic/office uses at an existing multi-tenant commercial building (Pacific Plaza Offices) located at 2200 Pacific Coast Highway based on use of up to 40 shared parking spaces with 2420 Pacific Coast Highway (Hope Chapel); and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach will hold a virtual public hearing on Tuesday, March 9, 2021 to consider the request described above. SAID PUBLIC HEARINGS shall be held virtually at 6:30 PM, or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. THIS MEETING IS HELD PURSUANT TO EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 ISSUED BY GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM ON MARCH 17, 2020. ANY OR ALL PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS MAY ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE BY TELECONFERENCE/VIRTUAL MEETING. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE BY TELECONFERENCE. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate and speak at these hearings at the above time. Written materials pertaining to matters listed on the agenda of a Regular Planning Commission meeting must be submitted by noon of the Tuesday, one week before the meeting in order to be included in the agenda packet. However, written materials received after that deadline will nonetheless be posted under the relevant agenda item on the City’s website at the same time as they are distri buted to the City Council by email and provided to the City Council and public at the meeting. Written comments may be mailed to the City Manager’s Office, City of Hermosa Beach, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 or emailed to esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION City Hall will be closed to the public until further notice. Members of the public may submit eComments (instructions below) or email comments to esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov until 12:00 PM on the meeting date. Please see the meeting agenda for teleconference participation details. Written comments may also be submitted via eComment in 3 easy steps: 1) Go to the Agendas/Minutes/Video webpage and find the meeting on which you’d like to comment; 2) Find the agenda item on which you’d like to comment; and 3) sign in to your SpeakUp Hermosa Account or sign in as a guest, enter your comment in the field provided, provide your name, and if applicable, attach files before submitting your comment. IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at the City Manager’s office at, or prior to, the public hearing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the City Clerk at the City Manager’s office, at (310) 318-0239 or esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov. The Department operates from 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday through Thursday. A copy of the agenda and staff reports will be available for public review 72 hours in advance of the meeting on the City’s website at www.hermosabeach.gov. Relevant Municipal Code sections are also available on the website. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Eddie Sarmiento City Clerk From:jim@fasolaarchitects.com To:Eduardo Sarmiento Subject:2200 PCH Date:Tuesday, March 2, 2021 3:25:52 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png image004.png image005.png City Manager: Please send this letter to all Councilmembers, regarding the 2200 PCH Parking Plan, for the City Council meeting of March 9, 2021. March 1, 2021 Subject: 2200 Pacific Coast Highway, Parking Plan 20-4 To the Hermosa Beach City Council, My family and I are strongly and absolutely opposed to the proposal for medical office use at 2200 Pacific Coast Highway and the proposed parking sharing with 2420 Pacific Coast Highway. The existing tenants of 2200 PCH already fill our local streets (Borden Ave, 21st Street, and Rhodes Street) every workday with their overflow cars. There is a shortage of available parking for that office building, and the small streets of our neighborhood are clogged because of it. To allow this more intensive use will make things even worse. The idea of having tenants or visitors park at 2420 PCH, and walk to 2200 PCH is absurd. The distance from the Hope Chapel parking lot to the entry stair of 2200 PCH is over 600 feet- a very long walk, and on very steep grades. The proposed walking route from Hope Chapel is down a steep vehicular driveway, without even a pedestrian lane (violating the current building code). Because the parking lot is not connected to the building lot, the walking route along PCH crosses two commercial driveways of unaffiliated businesses. Finally, the entrance to 2200 PCH is up a steep, narrow driveway, without a pedestrian path (again violating current code). There's not even a dedicated pedestrian path to the main entry of 2200 PCH; one must walk through the vehicle parking lot (another code violation). This "path" would be extremely dangerous. Also, the route is so steep that it would violate the most basic state disabled access requirements (California Building Code section 11B- 206.2.1). And critically, because of the danger, driveways like the ones at 2200 PCH and 2420 PCH, where pedestrians are forced to walk through vehicular driveways, have not been allowed in California for decades. The City would put itself in a precarious legal position by permitting a new violation of the Building Code. The City should NOT suggest that this route is either safe or allowable. This proposal should never have made it to the Planning Commission. People will avoid taking this route, and they will park on our small streets instead. I hope that each Councilmember will walk along this proposed pathway, and see how awkward and dangerous it really is. Jim Fasola Architect and resident 2024 Rhodes Street, Hermosa Beach On March 2, 2021 3:21 PM Eduardo Sarmiento <esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov> wrote: Test Best, Eddie Sarmiento | City ClerkOffice of the City ClerkCity of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254Direct: 310.318.0204 | City Hall: 310.318.0239Connect with us on Social Media: ­­­ Website: www.hermosabeach.gov City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0144 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER 8.52 OF TITLE 8 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS, FOR COMPLIANCE UNDER THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) (Deputy City Engineer Lucho Rodriguez) (Deputy City Attorney Kathy Shin) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council introduce on first reading an Ordinance amending Chapter 8.52 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Floodplain Management Regulations, for compliance under the National Flood Insurance Program Background: In 2017, as part of the its Open Pacific Coast Study, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) updated the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (“FIRM” or “flood maps”) for communities located along the California coast, including Hermosa Beach. The revised maps do not substantially change the City’s flood hazard determinations. However, when FEMA issues a community new or revised flood maps, the community must revise its floodplain regulations for consistency under the National Flood Insurance Program (“NFIP”). (44 CFR § 60.3(e).) Analysis: Attachment 1 contains FEMA’s suggested revisions to the City’s floodplain management ordinance (codified in Chapter 8.52 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code). The City’s consultant, Schaaf and Wheeler, have affirmed that FEMA’s proposed edits conform with the NFIP and recommend that the edits be adopted in their entirety. Apart from a few non-substantive edits, the proposed amendments principally clarify the construction requirements in the Special Flood Hazard Area (“SFHA”), the area in a floodplain subject to a 1 percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. Specifically, consistent with the requirements of the NFIP and the California Building Code, the proposed ordinance requires all new and substantially improved residential development, including manufactured homes, in the SFHA to be City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0144 elevated by at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation (“BFE”). The BFE refers to the height floodwaters are expected to reach during a 1 percent annual chance flood, as designated in FEMA flood maps. In other words, residential development in the SFHA require a minimum elevation of BFE and one foot of freeboard. (“Freeboard” refers to a factor of safety expressed in terms of structural feet above the BFE.) According to FEMA’s revised flood maps, the City’s SFHA remains predominantly west of the Strand wall. Under the NFIP, jurisdictions are required to revise their floodplain management regulations according to FEMA’s BFE determinations by the effective date of any revised map. The City’s revised flood maps take effect on April 21, 2021. General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: Public Safety Element Goal 1. Injuries and loss of life are prevented, and property loss and damage are minimized. Policies ·Evaluate risks.Buildings and infrastructure will be periodically evaluated for seismic, fire, flood, and coastal storm hazard risks and identified risks will be minimized by complying with California Building Code standards and other applicable regulations. ·1.5 Minimize coastal flooding.Natural interventions, green infrastructure, and infiltration systems will be utilized to minimize damage from coastal flooding. Fiscal Impact: There are no fiscal impacts associated with the amendment of the Flood Plain Management ordinance . Attachments: 1.Ordinance No.21-XXXX 2.Flood Map Exhibit Respectfully Submitted by:Lucho Rodriguez, Deputy City Engineer Concur:Marnell Gibson,Public Works Director Legal Review:Kathy Shin, Deputy City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ ORDINANCE NO. 21-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER 8.52 OF TITLE 8 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS, FOR COMPLIANCE UNDER THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does ordain as follows: Section 1. Section 8.52.050 of Chapter 8.52 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, “Definitions,” is hereby amended to add or amend the following definitions in alphabetical order: “Dune” means a continuous or nearly continuous mound or ridge of sand with relatively steep seaward and landward slopes immediately landward and adjacent to the beach and subject to erosion and overtopping from high tides and waves during major coastal storms. The inland limit of a primary frontal dune occurs at the point where there is a distinct change from a pronounced mound of sand to a relatively mild slope. "Existing manufactured home park or subdivision" means a manufactured home park or subdivision for which the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to be affixed (including, at a minimum, the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads) is completed before August 8, 2006. “New construction" for floodplain management purposes, means structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after August 8, 2006 and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures. “New manufactured home park or subdivision" means a manufactured home park or subdivision for which the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to be affixed (including at a minimum, the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads) is completed on or after August 8, 2006. “Special flood hazard area (SFHA)" means an area in the floodplain subject to a 1 percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. It is shown on an FHBM or FIRM as Zone A, AO, A1-A30, AE, A99, AH, V1-V30, VE or V. Section 2. Section 8.52.120 of Chapter 8.52 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, “Flood Damage Prevention Permit,” is hereby amended to read as follows: A flood damage prevention permit shall be obtained before any construction or other development, including manufactured homes, within any area of special flood hazard established in Section 8.52.070. Application for a flood damage prevention permit shall be made on forms furnished by the City of Hermosa Beach. The applicant shall provide the following minimum information: A. Plans in duplicate, drawn to scale, showing: 1. Location, dimensions, and elevation of the area in question, existing or proposed structures, storage of materials and equipment and their location; 2. Proposed locations of water supply, sanitary sewer, and other utilities; 3. Grading information showing existing and proposed contours, any proposed fill, and drainage facilities; 4. Location of the regulatory floodway when applicable; 5. Base flood elevation information as specified in Section 8.52.070 or Section 8.52.140.C; 6. Proposed elevation and one-foot freeboard in relation to mean sea level, of the lowest floor (including basement) of all structures; and 7. Proposed elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any nonresidential structure will be flood-proofed, as required in Section 8.52.160.C.3 of this chapter and detailed in FEMA Technical Bulletin TB 3-93. B. Certification from a registered civil engineer or architect that the nonresidential flood- proofed building meets the flood-proofing criteria in Section 8.52.160.C.3. C. For a crawl-space foundation, location and total net area of foundation openings as required in Section 8.52.160.C.2 of this chapter and detailed in FEMA Technical Bulletins 1-93 and 7-93. D. Description of the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development. E. All appropriate certifications listed in Section 8.52.140.E of this chapter. Section 3. Subsection (C), paragraph (1) of Section 8.52.160 of Chapter 8.52 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, “Standards of Construction,” is hereby amended to read as follows: C. Elevation and Flood-proofing. 1. Residential construction. All new construction or substantial improvements of residential structures, including manufactured homes, shall have the lowest floor, including basement: a. In AE, AH, A1-30 Zones, elevated to or above the base flood elevation and one-foot freeboard. b. In an AO zone, elevated above the highest adjacent grade to a height equal to or exceeding the depth number specified in feet on the FIRM, or elevated at least 2 feet above the highest adjacent grade if no depth number is specified, and one-foot freeboard. c. In an A zone, without BFE’s specified on the FIRM [unnumbered A zone], elevated to or above the base flood elevation and one-foot freeboard; as determined under Section 8.52.140.C. Section 4. Section 8.52.190 of Chapter 8.52 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, “Standards for Manufactured Homes,” is hereby amended to read as follows: A. All manufactured homes that are placed or substantially improved, on sites located: (1) outside of a manufactured home park or subdivision; (2) in a new manufactured home park or subdivision; (3) in an expansion to an existing manufactured home park or subdivision; or (4) in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision upon which a manufactured home has incurred "substantial damage" as the result of a flood, shall: 1. Within Zones A1 30, AH, and AE on the community’s Flood Insurance Rate Map, be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is elevated to or above the base flood elevation and one-foot freeboard and be securely fastened to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse, and lateral movement. 2. Within Zones V1 30, V, and VE on the community’s Flood Insurance Rate Map, meet the requirements of Section 8.52.210. B. All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved on sites in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision within Zones A1 30, AH, AE, V1 30, V, and VE on the community’s Flood Insurance Rate Map that are not subject to the provisions of Section 8.52.190 will be securely fastened to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse, and lateral movement, and be elevated so that either the: 1. Lowest floor of the manufactured home is at or above the base flood elevation and one-foot freeboard; or 2. Manufactured home chassis is supported by reinforced piers or other foundation elements of at least equivalent strength that are no less than 36 inches in height above grade. Upon the completion of the structure, the elevation of the lowest floor including basement shall be certified by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor, and verified by the community building inspector to be properly elevated. Such certification and verification shall be provided to the Floodplain Administrator. Section 5. Section 8.52.210 of Chapter 8.52 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, “Coastal High Hazard Areas,” is hereby amended to read as follows: Within coastal high hazard areas, Zones V, V1-30, and VE, as established under Section 8.52.070, the following standards shall apply: A. All new residential, manufactured homes, and non-residential construction, including substantial improvement/damage, shall be elevated on adequately anchored pilings or columns and securely anchored to such pilings or columns so that the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member of the lowest floor (excluding the pilings or columns) is elevated to or above the base flood level and one-foot freeboard. The pile or column foundation and structure attached thereto is anchored to resist flotation, collapse, and lateral movement due to the effects of wind and water loads acting simultaneously on all building components. Water loading values used shall be those associated with the base flood. Wind loading values used shall be those required by applicable state or local building standards. B. All new construction and other development shall be located on the landward side of the reach of mean high tide. C. All new construction and substantial improvement shall have the space below the lowest floor free of obstructions or constructed with breakaway walls as defined in Section 8.52.050 of this chapter. Such enclosed space shall not be used for human habitation and will be usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage. D. Fill shall not be used for structural support of buildings. E. Man made alteration of sand dunes which would increase potential flood damage is prohibited. F. The Floodplain Administrator shall obtain and maintain the following records: 1. Certification by a registered engineer or architect that a proposed structure complies with Section 8.52.210.A; and 2. The elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member of the lowest floor (excluding pilings or columns) of all new and substantially improved structures, and whether such structures contain a basement. Section 6. Severability. If any provision of this ordinance is declared to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any remaining provision hereof. The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance despite any partial invalidity. Section 7. Environmental Review. The City Council finds that adopting the foregoing amendments to the City’s floodplain management regulations is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3).) This Ordinance adopts amendments identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) as necessary to ensure that the City’s building standards account for the risk of regional flood hazards, consistent with the National Flood Insurance Program. The amendments are thus administrative in nature and designed to improve and not degrade environmental quality. As such, there is no possibility that adopting this ordinance would adversely affect the environment in any manner that could be significant for purposes of CEQA. The measure also qualifies for the Class 8 exemption for agency actions taken to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment. 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15308. By regulating construction in flood hazard areas, the ordinance ensures the protection of the City’s build environment. Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption pursuant to California Government Code section 36937. Section 9. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be published or posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of _____________ 2021. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ______________________________________________________________ MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________ City Clerk City Attorney ZONE VEZONE VEZONE AEZONE VEArdmoreAvePacificCoastHwyArtesiaBlvd Mont e r eyBlvdPierAve 1stSt 27thSt 8thSt Longfellow A v e 22nd St 2ndStHermosaAveArdmoreAveHermosaAveManhattanAve 2nd StGo ul dAv eLongfello w A v e Val l eyDrZONE VE2nd St 8thSt 1stSt HermosaAveManhattan AveZONE VEZONE VEHermosaAveManhattanAve22nd St HermosaAveZONE VEZONE VEZONE AEManhattanAveHermosa AveLongfellow A v e Greenw ichV illageOverview of City Coastline and Flood Hazard Area City Boundary Flood Hazard Area - Effective 04.21.21 The Strand Wall City Coastline and Flood Hazard Area Southern City Boundary to the Pier City Coastline and Flood Hazard Area The Pier to north of 22nd St City Coastline and Flood Hazard Area 22nd St to Northern City Boundary ¯ Zone AE - Areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual chance-flood event determined by detailed methods. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements and floodplain management standards apply. ZONE VE - Areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual- chance flood event with additional hazards due to storm-induced velocity wave action. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements and floodplain management standards apply. Special Flood Hazard Areas - Effective April 21, 2021 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0145 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 RELEASE THE HOLD PLACED ON CIP 544-GREENBELT ACCESSIBLE PATH ASSESSMENT AND APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ACCESS, INC.’s PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1.Release the hold placed on CIP 544-Greenbelt Accessible Path Assessment; 2.Authorize an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement No. 20.04 with Access, Inc. for an additional $10,000 from CIP 544 to identify and provide an assessment of alternatives for an accessible path within the Greenbelt; and 3.Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the amendment to the Professional Services Agreement, subject to approval by the City Attorney. Executive Summary: CIP 544-Greenbelt Accessible Path Assessment (Attachment 1)needs to be released from the on- hold list for staff to initiate work on this project. Staff recommends amending the existing contract with Access,Inc.to authorize work on this study which would include assessing alternatives and identifying any potential impacts. Background: In 2017,Capital Improvement Project (CIP)544 was created as a study for the feasibility of installing an accessible path on the Greenbelt.This project was later put on hold by Council due to the large number of projects active and the low availability of staff to work on all the projects. Access,Inc.,an accessibility specialist,was retained by the City on October 9,2020 to assist the City with the assessment of pending ADA grievances and to assist with design guidelines and performance assessment of the accessible path on the beach (Attachment 2). City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0145 Discussion: In order to begin work on Capital Improvement Project CIP 544,the project would need to be released from the on-hold status.This action would then facilitate the issuance of a task order to a consultant to begin the analysis. The scope of work of the study is currently described as “Determine the feasibility of installing an accessible surface path on the Greenbelt to provide a firm,natural looking path that increases accessibility for the disabled and boosts accessibility for all”(Attachment 3). In October 2020,the City retained the services of an ADA access specialist,Access,Inc.,under Professional Services Agreement (PSA)20-004 for $30,000,and was executed under the City Manager’s authority.The original scope of work for Access,Inc.was primarily to provide expert evaluation of ADA grievances that have been filed with the City,and to assist with providing a design and ADA compliance recommendations for an access path on the beach. To further the ongoing efforts of increasing accessibility throughout the City,the services of Access, Inc.,were retained based on their expertise and knowledge with the regulations as well as their familiarity with the City of Hermosa Beach.Retaining their continued services to provide an assessment of alternatives for an accessible path within the Greenbelt requires an amendment to the current PSA.Amendment 1 would require funding of up to $10,000 which is available in CIP 544 project. This would bring the total PSA to a new Not-to-Exceed amount of $40,000. General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendations have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Applicable policies are listed below: Mobility Element Goal 3. Public right-of-ways supporting a multimodal and people-oriented transportation system that provides diversity and flexibility on how users choose to be mobile. Policies · 3.10 Require ADA standards. Require that all public right-of-ways be designed per Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards by incorporating crosswalks, curb ramps, pedestrian signals, and other components to provide ease of access for disabled persons. Parks + Open Space Element Goal 4.Direct and accessible routes and connections to parks, recreational facilities, and open space are provided. Policies ·4.4 ADA accessible park access. Install ADA and universally accessible amenities and equipment so that all parks, beach, and trail networks are accessible to all persons. Goal 6.The coast and its recreational facilities are easily accessible from many locations and by multiple transportation modes. Policies City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0145 · 6.6 Universal access. Provide resources that improve accessibility to the beach for all visitors. Fiscal Impact: Funding for Amendment No. 1 in the amount of $10,000 is available in the Capital Improvement Fund for CIP 544 Greenbelt Accessible Path Assessment, account 301-8544-4201. Attachments: 1.CIP 544 Project Sheet 2.PSA 20-004 3.Amendment No. 1 Respectfully Submitted by: Lucho Rodriguez, Deputy City Engineer Concur: Marnell Gibson, Public Works Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Charlotte Newkirk, Accounting Manager Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STUDY REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Study 301-8544-4201 STUDY NO./TITLE: 544 Greenbelt Accessible Path Assessment STUDY DESCRIPTION: Determine the feasibility of installing an accessible surface path on the Greenbelt to provide a firm, natural looking path that increases accessibility for the disabled and boosts accessibility for all. JUSTIFICATION: Increase accessibility and enjoyment on the Greenbelt. STATUS: On Hold Secure services of design firm to provide a conceptual design/feasibility of a path on the Green Belt. COST TO COMPLETE STUDY REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS Study $10,000 301 Capital Improvement Fund $10,000 CURRENT REQUEST STUDY TOTAL: $10,000 TOTAL FY 20-21 STUDY FUNDING: $10,000 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ADA CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND ACCESS, INC. This First Amendment to the Agreement to provide On-Call Professional Engineering Design Services (“First Amendment”) is entered into by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Access, Inc., a California corporation (“Consultant”) as of March 9, 2021. RECITALS A. City and Consultant are parties to Agreement 20.004 dated October 9, 2020 (the “Agreement”) by which City engaged Consultant to provide Professional Engineering Services. B. City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement in order to increase the agreement amount by $10,000 to have sufficient funds to engage consultant on additional projects. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Agreement is amended as follows: 1. Section 1 (C) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a total not to exceed of $40,000, for CONSULTANT’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement. Except as above modified, in all other respects the Agreement is hereby reaffirmed in full force and effect. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT ________________________________ _______________________________ Justin Massey, Mayor Access, Inc. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ ____________________________________ Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Michael Jenkins, City Attorney City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2020-21 Continued from February 23, 2021 (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1.Approve the revisions to estimated revenue,appropriations,budget transfers,and fund balances as shown herein and in the attached Revenue Detail Report,Additional Appropriations Report, Budget Transfers Report, and Budget Summary Report; 2.Approve the following transactions from the General Fund: a.Transfer $88,294 to the assigned fund balance for Contingencies in order to maintain the City’s target of 16% of appropriations for this goal; b.Transfer $1,751,688 of unspent funds from 2019-20 from the unassigned fund balance category to the assigned fund balance category; and c.Transfer 1,823,416 of unspent funds from 2020-21 from the unassigned fund balance category to the assigned fund balance category. 3.Receive and file the attached information about City Council travel. Executive Summary: With an estimated revenue increase of 4.9%or $1,773,914 and changes in the General Fund balance for General Plan Maintenance Fees and Frontier Public Educational and Government (PEG)Grant,funds are available to cover the midyear requests for additional appropriations of $237,769,an increase to the Contingency (Rainy Day Fund)of $88,294,and assign the remaining balance of $1,823,416 for use in the 2021-22 Annual Budget, if needed. Background: The City has conducted a Midyear Budget Review annually since fiscal year 1981-82.The review is a good tool to ensure that assumptions and estimates originally used to prepare the budget ten months earlier remain realistic.All revisions will be recorded as of January 31,2021 so that midyear revisions for revenue and appropriations will reflect in the 2020-21 Budget worksheets used for preparation of the 2021-22 Budget. The City Council Conference/Travel Summary was requested by City Council in 2014-15 and continues to City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 13 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 be provided. See Attachment 5. Analysis: OVERVIEW The 2020-2021 Budget was compiled assuming that COVID-19 impacts would continue through December, with the second half of this year returning to “normal”. That seemed very conservative at the time; however, it is now known that COVID-19 may well continue through June 2021 and beyond. The Midyear revenue and appropriations were prepared with the assumption that COVID-19 will continue through June 30, 2021. While COVID-19 continues to impact revenue, the Midyear Budget Review estimates an increase in revenue of 4.9% or $1,773,914. Staff recommends that the City’s Contingency (Rainy Day Fund) be adjusted to the goal of 16% of appropriations for operations by adding $88,294. In addition, staff recommends that any remaining funds be assigned for the 2021-22 Budget. During budget preparation, staff will evaluate if there are sufficient funds available to transfer according to the City’s fund balance policies outlined later in the staff report or if these funds should be used in the 2021-22 Budget. REVENUE (Refer to Attachment 1, Midyear Revenue Detail Report, for individual revenue accounts.) Revenue is estimated to increase 4.9%over the 2020-21 Budget,but is still 3.5%below 2019-20 actual revenue and 10%below 2018-19 actual revenue.The following chart shows revenue by category and the following graphs show trends for the largest tax revenue sources. 2020-21 2020-21 Increase % General Fund Revised Budget Midyear Revision (Decrease)Change Property Taxes 20,224,054 20,284,810 60,756 0.3% Sales Taxes 2,750,820 2,750,820 0 0.0% Utility User's Tax 2,147,057 2,065,046 (82,011)-3.8% Transient Occupancy Tax 1,440,460 1,836,531 396,071 27.5% Other Taxes 1,682,535 2,032,316 349,781 20.8% Licenses and Permits 905,881 902,093 (3,788)-0.4% Fines & Forfeitures 1,033,230 1,978,497 945,267 91.5% Use of Money & Property 886,438 635,452 (250,986)-28.3% Intergovernmental/State 143,510 126,895 (16,615)-11.6% Current Service Charges 4,674,001 5,022,541 348,540 7.5% Other Revenue 66,145 93,044 26,899 40.7% Total 35,954,131 37,728,045 1,773,914 4.9% 2020-21 Midyear Revenue by Category City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 2 of 13 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 TAXES Property Tax The estimate for secured property tax revenue is increased by 0.3%to reflect growth of 5%over 2019-20 actual revenue;the original budget assumed growth of 5.4%over the 2019-20 Budget.The new estimate is $15,992,604. Growth for the prior four years was 5.6%, 8%, 8%, and 7% respectively. Sales Tax Sales tax revenue remains at the original budgeted amount of $2,750,820.Based on first quarter revenue,the budget estimate would be a bit high;however,revenue will be received from the new auto dealership due to a sales tax sharing agreement with Redondo Beach so the estimate is unchanged.The estimate is essentially at the 2019-20 level and is 15% under 2018-19 due to COVID-19. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 3 of 13 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 As shown in the charts on the following page,the category with the highest sales tax overall is still Eating/Drinking Places,which decreased 34.3%from the prior year followed closely by the County/State Pool which grew by 47%over last year.This reflects the increase in internet sales since more people are shopping remotely.The categories with the highest dollar increase are County/State Pool and Other Retail. The following charts compare sales tax on major accounts for only the first quarter of this year to the first quarter of last year for the top ten business classes and by geographic area.Detailed information on sales tax is only available for the first quarter due to the one quarter lag in information from the State. Sales Tax Comparison of First Quarter of 2019-20 to 2020-21 % OF TOTAL Retail Group Eating/Drinking Places 194,440 ($101,328)-34.26%25.64% Other Retail 74,115 $11,776 18.89%9.77% Food Stores 64,794 $7,636 13.36%8.54% Building Materials 64,016 ($4,680)-6.81%8.45% Auto Dealers & Supplies 36,286 $554 1.55%4.78% Apparel Stores 27,203 ($5,341)-16.41%3.59% All Other Retail 20,340 $1,876 10.16%2.68% Service Stations Drug Stores Furniture/Appliance 15,994 $208 1.32%2.11% Total Retail Group 534,532 ($103,380)-16.21%70.48% County/State Pool 174,705 $55,697 46.80%23.03% Total Manufacturing 28,362 $2,706 10.55%3.74% & Wholesale Total Business, Service, 20,807 ($11,427)-35.45%2.74% Repair Total Non-Store/Part Time 48 ($1,266)-96.35%0.01% Retailers/Adjustments * Threshold for inclusion, $300 per quarter CONFIDENTIAL: Business class sales tax information is deemed confidential if there are four or less businesses in a class or if a single class member's share is a disproportionate percentage of the total. RANK / BUSINESS CLASS*INC/(DEC)% CHANGE PREVIOUS YEARSALES TAX 2020-21 -- CONFIDENTIAL -- -- CONFIDENTIAL -- City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 4 of 13 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 % OF TOTAL Retail Group Eating/Drinking Places 194,440 ($101,328)-34.26%25.64% Other Retail 74,115 $11,776 18.89%9.77% Food Stores 64,794 $7,636 13.36%8.54% Building Materials 64,016 ($4,680)-6.81%8.45% Auto Dealers & Supplies 36,286 $554 1.55%4.78% Apparel Stores 27,203 ($5,341)-16.41%3.59% All Other Retail 20,340 $1,876 10.16%2.68% Service Stations Drug Stores Furniture/Appliance 15,994 $208 1.32%2.11% Total Retail Group 534,532 ($103,380)-16.21%70.48% County/State Pool 174,705 $55,697 46.80%23.03% Total Manufacturing 28,362 $2,706 10.55%3.74% & Wholesale Total Business, Service, 20,807 ($11,427)-35.45%2.74% Repair Total Non-Store/Part Time 48 ($1,266)-96.35%0.01% Retailers/Adjustments * Threshold for inclusion, $300 per quarter CONFIDENTIAL: Business class sales tax information is deemed confidential if there are four or less businesses in a class or if a single class member's share is a disproportionate percentage of the total. RANK / BUSINESS CLASS*INC/(DEC)% CHANGE PREVIOUS YEARSALES TAX 2020-21 -- CONFIDENTIAL -- -- CONFIDENTIAL -- Sales Tax Comparison by Geographic Area Revenue % of % Revenue % OF LOCATION 2019-20 Total Change 2020-21 Total PCH 268,011$ 44%-7%249,462$ 49% Downtown 251,425 41%-35%162,256 31% Pier/Valley/Monterey 71,142 11%3%73,303 14% Aviation 23,894 4%22%29,267 6% City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 5 of 13 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 Revenue % of % Revenue % OF LOCATION 2019-20 Total Change 2020-21 Total PCH 268,011$ 44%-7%249,462$ 49% Downtown 251,425 41%-35%162,256 31% Pier/Valley/Monterey 71,142 11%3%73,303 14% Aviation 23,894 4%22%29,267 6% Transient Occupancy Tax Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT)receipts for the first half are 27.5%higher than budget.Occupancy of 30%was assumed in the original budget and at midyear is now at 50.7%.The projection is based on first half tax receipts.The new estimate is lower than 2019-20 by 29%and lower than 2018-19 by 44%based on the first half. Occupancy was 81.4% for the first half of 2019-20 . In November 2019,the voters passed Measure H which increased the Transient Occupancy Tax from 12% to 14%, effective January 1, 2020. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 6 of 13 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 Utility User Tax The estimate for Utility User Tax (UUT)revenue is reduced by 3%from the original budget,consistent with 2019-20 revenue.Revenue for the first half is within 1%of 2019-20.The largest reductions for the first half continue to be cellular and cable due to price reductions,bundling,and transfers to non-taxed services. Other Tax This category increased 20.8%primarily due to higher than expected revenue for business licenses.A revenue decrease that was anticipated in the budget did not transpire.The new budget estimate for business licenses is still lower than 2019-20 by 6%. Frontier Cable Franchise Fees are being revised down 31% based on the first half. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 7 of 13 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 Licenses and Permits This category is down by less than 1%. Fines and Forfeitures The largest change is in this category,an increase of $945,267 or 91.5%.The original budget assumed parking fines would decrease 56%due to cessation of street sweeping and issuance of other citations.Ultimately the street sweeping had to be resumed for purposes of trash collection. Estimated revenue is still 4% less than 2019-20 and 10% less than 2018-19. Use of Money and Property This category is down by 28.3%primarily due to revenue reductions in Community Center rentals, theatre and special events for a total amount of $123,720.Interest income is revised down 32%or $382,818 overall based on declining interest rates.The General Fund reduction is ($129,456)with a new estimate of $92,171.Adjustments to interest are made between funds according to the actual cash balances for each fund. Intergovernmental/State Estimated reimbursements for the category were decreased $16,615,primarily due to a decrease in Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST)reimbursement to reflect postponed and cancelled trainings due to COVID-19. Current Service Charges User fees or service charges are up 7.5%.There are many accounts in this category,some increase and some decrease.Parking demand was higher than anticipated overall except for the Parking Structure, which was closed for a longer period of time than other parking lots.The most notable revisions are below,highlights of which include:some building-related revenue increasing,recreation programs other than contract classes not offered due to COVID-19,fewer ambulance transports,and no need for special event security. Building-related Plan Check $73,400 and Residential Inspection Fees Parking Lot A $67,128 Parking Lot B $31,521 Contract Recreation Programs $72,430 Parking Meters $336,755 Credit Card Processing Fee $45,589 Special Event Security, Police ($52,000) Ambulance Transport ($72,213) Parking Structure ($47,591) Other Recreation Programs ($144,810) City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 8 of 13 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 Building-related Plan Check $73,400 and Residential Inspection Fees Parking Lot A $67,128 Parking Lot B $31,521 Contract Recreation Programs $72,430 Parking Meters $336,755 Credit Card Processing Fee $45,589 Special Event Security, Police ($52,000) Ambulance Transport ($72,213) Parking Structure ($47,591) Other Recreation Programs ($144,810) Other Revenue The increase in this category is primarily due to funds received in the General Miscellaneous, Reimbursement/Refund and Contribution (donations)accounts.No revenue is assumed in the original budget for these revenue sources.Appropriations have already been added where a donation is intended to be spent. ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS (Attachment 2) Additional appropriations are shown on the attached spreadsheet,2020-21 Additional Appropriations Report.While overall appropriations in the General Fund increased,there are several reductions related to Community Resources programs and Crossing Guard Services impacted by COVID-19. Several new grants have been awarded to the City.Revenue estimates have been adjusted and additional appropriations have been requested accordingly. Several Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs)have been reduced due to 2019-20 actual revenue being lower than originally estimated in several funds.Proposition A,C,Measure M Transit Funds,Measure R Transportation Funds,and Measure W Clean Water Funds are all sales tax based and are expected to decrease.Additional funding has been added to two CIPs from the Capital Improvement Fund and a new project,CIP 603 South Park Slope and Irrigation Repairs,was created to address sloped areas around the playground area at South Park. RESULT OF CHANGES As a result of changes to estimated revenue,appropriation revisions,General Plan Maintenance Fees, and the Frontier PEG Grant, a balance of $1,911,710 is available in the General Fund. Staff recommends that those funds be used in the following manner: City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 9 of 13 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 ·Assign additional funds of $88,294 from the balance available in the General Fund to bring the Contingency up to the goal amount of 16% of General Fund operating appropriations. ·Assign the remaining available balance of $1,823,416,for the 2021-22 Budget.Due to the ongoing uncertainties from COVID-19 and the previous measures taken to balance the 2020-21 Budget, staff recommends reserving the available balance for the 2021-22 Budget process,at which time it will be determined if the funds need to remain in the General Fund or should transfer to meet funding goals, in accordance with the financial policies listed below. FINANCIAL POLICIES The City Council’s adopted fund balance policies are: General Fund Any funds remaining unspent at year-end in the General Fund transfer equally to the Contingency Balance,Insurance Fund,Equipment Replacement Fund,the Capital Improvement Fund,and Capital Facility Reserve.The City Council may change these transfers annually as necessary.For 2019-20,the unspent funds of $1,751,688 remained in the General Fund and are currently unassigned.Due to the ongoing budget implications from COVID-19,staff recommends reserving the funds in the General Fund along with the funds remaining from the Midyear Budget adjustments.Once the 2021-22 Budget estimates are reviewed,recommendations will be made regarding the 2019-20 unspent funds and any unappropriated funds from 2020 -21. Use of these funds will be determined in conjunction with the 2021-21 budget requests. Contingency Balance The goal is to maintain an amount equal to 16%of the General Fund operating appropriations to be used in the event of economic uncertainties or unforeseen emergencies. Compensated Absences Balance The goal is to maintain 25%of the funding needed for accrued liabilities for employee vacation, sick, and compensatory time. Retirement Rate Stabilization Balance These funds were set aside in the 2004-05 Budget for use during times of rate volatility.The 2018- 19 Budget approved that the existing balance of $1 million be used for the creation of a retirement trust however that action is on hold pending COVID-19. The current balance is $1,021,575. Insurance Fund The goal is to maintain $3,000,000 in net position for claims above recorded claims liabilities or City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 10 of 13 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 The goal is to maintain $3,000,000 in net position for claims above recorded claims liabilities or catastrophic losses. Equipment Replacement Fund The goal is to maintain net position equal to the accumulated amount calculated on the equipment replacement schedule for all equipment, based on replacement cost and useful life. Progress on Funding Goals Fund Name Goal Estimated Fund Balance 12/31/2020 Estimated Fund Balance 6/30/2021 After Midyear Change Over/(Under) Goal Amount Compensated Absences Balance $267,950 $0 $267,950 ($53,965) Contingency Balance $88,294 1 $6,300,710 $0 Equipment Replacement Fund $2,170,911 $1,745,888 ($29,132)2 $1,716,756 ($454,155) 1 From General Fund available fund balance. 2 Additional appropriations requested by department, net of revenue revisions. $2,433,099 ($566,901)Insurance Fund Recommended Midyear Change $6,300,710 16% of Operating Budget $321,915 25% of Current Liability $3,000,000 $2,643,797 $6,212,416 ($210,698)2 As shown in the Over/(Under)Goal Amount column,the Contingency Balance goal is at the target amount after the recommended changes.Due to the annual adjustment to the claims liabilities and additional appropriations recommended at Midyear for litigation,unemployment and insurance premiums, the balance in the Insurance Fund is currently under the $3,000,000 goal.Claims liabilities will be adjusted in the Insurance Fund at year end based on actuarial reports typically received in May for Worker’s Compensation and General Liability Claims.The Equipment Replacement Fund (ERF)is also under the goal amount at this time.Fund balances will be evaluated again with the 2021-22 Budget and a recommendation made for the Insurance Fund and ERF balance at that time.As previously noted,a recommendation for the year end transfer of unspent funds will also be evaluated during the 2021-22 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 11 of 13 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 recommendation for the year end transfer of unspent funds will also be evaluated during the 2021-22 budget process. UPCOMING/ONGOING CHALLENGES With approval of the Midyear changes by the City Council,staff will move forward with preparation of the 2021-22 Budget.Due to the ongoing uncertainty due to COVID-19,budget projections continue to be challenging. As always, staff will remain conservative in its approach to the budget process for next year. 2021-22 BUDGET WORKSHOP The Capital Improvement Plan Study Session is planned for April 21,2021.The Budget Study Session is scheduled for May 27, 2021 at 6:00 pm, with adoption planned for June 8, 2021. General Plan Consistency: PLAN Hermosa,the City’s long-range planning document,was adopted by the City Council in August 2017,and envisions a future where “Hermosa Beach is the small town others aspire to be;a place where our beach culture,strong sense of community,and commitment to sustainability intersect.”One of the guiding principles to achieve the vision is to make decisions and take actions that help contribute to the City’s economic and fiscal stability. A focus of the Governance chapter in the General Plan is to ensure that decision-making and leadership is conducted in an ethical,transparent,and innovative manner that reflects community values.Goal 1 of the Governance chapter speaks to maintaining a high degree of transparency and integrity in the decision -making process. Other relevant General Plan policies are listed below: Infrastructure ·1.2 Priority investments.Use City Council established priorities and the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to identify and allocate funding for projects identified in the infrastructure plan. Public Safety ·5.2 High level of response.Achieve optimal utilization of allocated public safety resources and provide desired levels of response, staffing, and protection within the community. Fiscal Impact: The Midyear budget revisions increase revenue estimates in the General Fund by $1,773,914 and appropriations by $237,769.The Contingency (Rainy Day Fund)meets the 16%funding goal.The City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 12 of 13 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0122 appropriations by $237,769.The Contingency (Rainy Day Fund)meets the 16%funding goal.The Compensated Absences balance,Insurance Fund,and Equipment Replacement Fund balances are all below the target funding goals but will be evaluated as a part of the 2021-22 Budget process. Attachments: 1. 2020-21 Revenue Detail Report 2. 2020-21 Additional Appropriations Report 3. 2020-21 Budget Transfers Report 4. 2020-21 Midyear Budget Summary Report 5. 2020-21 City Council Travel Summary Respectfully Submitted by: Viki Copeland Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 13 of 13 powered by Legistar™ 2020-21 Revenue Detail Report Funds Funds Name Acct Code Account Name 2020 Actual 2020 YTD Through December 2021 YTD Through December 2021 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Estimate Increase/ (Decrease) % Change 001 General Fund 3101 Current Year Secured 15,231,923.10 6,049,285.43 6,421,537.30 15,939,215.00 15,992,604.00 53,389.00 0.33% 001 General Fund 3102 Current Year Unsecured 579,187.76 510,150.31 505,089.61 572,826.00 535,331.00 (37,495.00) -6.55% 001 General Fund 3103 Prior Year Collections 33,485.28 108,843.84 195,882.15 - - - N/A 001 General Fund 3106 Supplemental Roll SB813 401,143.34 176,349.71 156,934.24 332,773.00 317,435.00 (15,338.00) -4.61% 001 General Fund 3107 Transfer Tax 313,330.96 113,746.09 170,136.20 252,800.00 313,000.00 60,200.00 23.81% 001 General Fund 3108 Sales Tax 2,722,468.33 1,080,631.21 1,073,686.47 2,750,820.00 2,750,820.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3109 1/2 Cent Sales Tx Ext 239,965.25 89,004.83 90,815.16 226,706.00 233,270.00 6,564.00 2.90% 001 General Fund 3110 Spectrum Cable TV Franchise 181,079.67 45,039.55 44,211.73 180,000.00 180,000.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3111 Electric Franchise 77,789.54 - - 77,790.00 77,790.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3112 Gas Franchise 40,597.04 - - 40,597.00 40,597.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3113 Refuse Franchise 271,752.39 111,939.08 125,645.66 254,418.00 285,459.00 31,041.00 12.20% 001 General Fund 3114 Transient Occupancy Tax 2,597,953.26 1,517,308.35 1,004,512.33 1,440,460.00 1,836,531.00 396,071.00 27.50% 001 General Fund 3115 Business License 1,162,016.66 452,401.86 427,119.07 732,024.00 1,097,066.00 365,042.00 49.87% 001 General Fund 3120 Utility User Tax 2,093,902.50 898,063.83 890,066.19 2,147,057.00 2,065,046.00 (82,011.00) -3.82% 001 General Fund 3122 Property tax In-lieu of Veh Lic Fees 2,874,078.65 19,300.65 18,564.77 3,126,440.00 3,126,440.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3123 Frontier Cable Franchise Fee 151,525.51 40,560.82 32,850.32 171,000.00 118,134.00 (52,866.00) -30.92% Total Taxes 28,972,199.24 11,212,625.56 11,157,051.20 28,244,926.00 28,969,523.00 724,597.00 001 General Fund 3202 Dog Licenses 19,874.50 14,978.00 20,928.50 18,000.00 25,541.00 7,541.00 41.89% 001 General Fund 3204 Building Permits 482,610.45 275,131.06 248,746.41 688,000.00 688,000.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3205 Electric Permits 81,166.00 39,038.00 28,777.00 67,200.00 67,200.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3206 Plumbing Permits 67,398.94 39,439.00 25,759.00 58,800.00 58,800.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3207 Occupancy Permits 12,096.00 7,016.00 6,441.00 16,000.00 11,000.00 (5,000.00) -31.25% 001 General Fund 3208 Grease Trap Permits 2,841.00 1,118.00 1,483.00 2,380.00 2,380.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3209 Garage Sales 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3211 Banner Permits 1,328.00 600.00 56.00 980.00 56.00 (924.00) -94.29% 001 General Fund 3213 Animal Redemption Fee 259.00 153.00 - 400.00 - (400.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3214 Amplified Sound Permit 5,261.00 3,500.00 (204.00) 2,868.00 (204.00) (3,072.00) -107.11% 001 General Fund 3215 Temporary Sign Permit 1,290.00 765.00 - 440.00 - (440.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3217 Open Fire Permit 449.00 265.00 - -- - N/A 001 General Fund 3219 Newsrack Permits - - 112.00 162.00 112.00 (50.00) -30.86% 001 General Fund 3225 Taxicab Franchise Fees - - - - - - N/A 001 General Fund 3226 Outdoor Seating Permit/Private Property 513.00 - 513.00 - 513.00 513.00 N/A 001 General Fund 3227 Mechanical Permits 49,128.00 26,179.00 16,264.00 46,200.00 46,200.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3228 Concealed Weapons Permit - - - 100.00 100.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3230 Temporary Minor Special Event Permit 2,535.00 1,509.00 - 2,565.00 - (2,565.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3236 Drone Permit Fee 2,470.00 1,525.00 1,380.00 1,450.00 2,325.00 875.00 60.34% 001 General Fund 3239 A-Frame sign Permit 332.00 - - 266.00 - (266.00) -100.00% Total Licenses & Permits 729,621.89 411,286.06 350,325.91 905,881.00 902,093.00 (3,788.00) Attachment 1 1 2020-21 Revenue Detail Report Funds Funds Name Acct Code Account Name 2020 Actual 2020 YTD Through December 2021 YTD Through December 2021 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Estimate Increase/ (Decrease) % Change 001 General Fund 3301 Municipal Court Fines 59,665.39 30,915.32 21,918.16 - 39,351.00 39,351.00 N/A 001 General Fund 3302 Court Fines /Parking 1,966,079.01 1,183,788.35 1,135,346.45 1,004,230.00 1,893,396.00 889,166.00 88.54% 001 General Fund 3305 Administrative Fines 128,900.00 5,800.00 30,815.01 7,000.00 32,000.00 25,000.00 357.14% 001 General Fund 3306 Nuisance Abatement-Restrooms 5,600.00 3,100.00 8,250.00 22,000.00 13,750.00 (8,250.00) -37.50% Total Fines & Forfeitures 2,160,244.40 1,223,603.67 1,196,329.62 1,033,230.00 1,978,497.00 945,267.00 001 General Fund 3401 Interest Income 217,578.31 102,485.79 24,594.55 201,627.00 92,171.00 (109,456.00) -54.29% 001 General Fund 3402 Rents & Concessions 466.08 466.08 - - - - N/A 001 General Fund 3404 Community Center Leases 20,116.60 12,706.80 8,277.39 36,479.00 33,294.75 (3,184.25) -8.73% 001 General Fund 3405 Community Center Rentals 145,265.49 82,102.75 32,456.50 103,430.00 72,000.00 (31,430.00) -30.39% 001 General Fund 3406 Community Center Theatre 57,542.00 47,997.50 - 46,150.00 - (46,150.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3418 Special Events 90,863.60 83,559.60 5,410.50 52,540.00 6,400.00 (46,140.00) -87.82% 001 General Fund 3422 Beach/Plaza Promotions - - - 30,000.00 11,771.00 (18,229.00) -60.76% 001 General Fund 3425 Ground Lease 39,381.60 19,690.80 19,690.80 40,366.00 47,891.00 7,525.00 18.64% 001 General Fund 3427 Cell Site License 40,051.47 19,764.96 20,390.82 44,291.00 41,291.00 (3,000.00) -6.77% 001 General Fund 3428 Cell Site License - Verizon 33,721.00 16,693.56 17,194.38 34,733.00 34,733.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3429 Inmate Phone Services 634.71 285.75 - 1,000.00 50.00 (950.00) -95.00% 001 General Fund 3431 Storage Facility Operating Lease 180,000.00 90,000.00 120,000.00 240,000.00 240,000.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3432 Film Permits 55,650.66 41,470.66 5,431.00 55,760.00 55,760.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3450 Investment Discount 76.85 40.07 26.06 62.00 89.90 27.90 45.00% Total Use of Money & Property 881,348.37 517,264.32 253,472.00 886,438.00 635,451.65 (250,986.35) 001 General Fund 3507 Highway Maintenance - - - 2,300.00 2,300.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3508 Mandated Costs 10,387.00 10,387.00 7,991.38 11,000.00 7,991.00 (3,009.00) -27.35% 001 General Fund 3509 Homeowner Property Tax Relief 81,196.32 12,179.46 11,831.59 82,723.00 81,196.00 (1,527.00) -1.85% 001 General Fund 3510 POST 10,693.86 5,234.96 - 24,579.00 12,500.00 (12,079.00) -49.14% 001 General Fund 3511 STC-Service Officer Training 10,695.00 990.00 267.24 7,200.00 7,200.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3575 VLF Coll Excess of $14m-Rev code 11001.5 15,707.91 - - 15,708.00 15,708.00 - 0.00% Total Intergovernmental/State 128,680.09 28,791.42 20,090.21 143,510.00 126,895.00 (16,615.00) 001 General Fund 3801 Residential Inspection 52,381.20 29,372.20 36,986.00 50,600.00 76,000.00 25,400.00 50.20% 001 General Fund 3802 Planning Sign Permit/Master Sign Program 12,918.00 10,275.00 3,936.00 10,185.00 4,646.00 (5,539.00) -54.38% 001 General Fund 3803 Environmental Impact / Negative Declaration - - - 3,503.00 - (3,503.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3804 General Plan Maintenance Fees 93,522.00 53,286.00 41,412.00 180,100.00 160,000.00 (20,100.00) -11.16% 001 General Fund 3805 Amendments (Panning Entitlement / Conditional Use Permit)20,092.25 12,919.50 22,070.00 26,484.00 26,484.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3808 Zone Variance Review - - - 3,861.00 - (3,861.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3809 Tentative Map Review 2,340.50 4,681.00 4,821.00 19,284.00 19,284.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3810 Final Map Review 1,402.00 1,402.00 722.00 2,888.00 2,184.00 (704.00) -24.38% 2 2020-21 Revenue Detail Report Funds Funds Name Acct Code Account Name 2020 Actual 2020 YTD Through December 2021 YTD Through December 2021 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Estimate Increase/ (Decrease) % Change 001 General Fund 3811 Zone Change - - 1,044.00 4,176.00 1,044.00 (3,132.00) -75.00% 001 General Fund 3812 Conditional Use Permit - Comm/Other 29,622.00 14,592.00 - 15,030.00 5,070.00 (9,960.00) -66.27% 001 General Fund 3813 Plan Check Fees 369,019.95 208,080.48 181,837.51 252,000.00 300,000.00 48,000.00 19.05% 001 General Fund 3814 Planning/Zoning Appeal - - - - - - N/A 001 General Fund 3815 Public Works Services 102,489.47 57,878.38 64,579.71 84,430.00 95,000.00 10,570.00 12.52% 001 General Fund 3816 Utility Trench Service Connect Permit 142,362.13 31,311.50 59,310.73 96,568.00 96,568.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3817 Address Change Request Fee 3,637.00 2,165.00 1,736.00 2,480.00 2,480.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3818 Police Services 6,170.00 5,268.00 2,154.00 2,400.00 3,000.00 600.00 25.00% 001 General Fund 3819 Jail Services 1,649.00 795.00 - 2,730.00 - (2,730.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3821 Daily Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 45,322.00 30,163.00 14,415.00 26,167.00 29,574.00 3,407.00 13.02% 001 General Fund 3823 Special Event Security/Police 71,885.19 69,127.51 - 52,000.00 - (52,000.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3824 500' Noticing 21,824.00 12,136.00 9,688.00 19,376.00 16,693.00 (2,683.00) -13.85% 001 General Fund 3825 Public Notice Posting 4,620.00 2,745.00 2,618.00 4,675.00 3,752.00 (923.00) -19.74% 001 General Fund 3827 Library Grounds Maintenance 9,130.00 - 9,586.00 9,586.00 9,586.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3831 Non-Utility Street Excavation Permit / Street Cut Inspection 51,175.64 31,180.00 23,096.00 41,640.00 41,640.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3834 Encroachment Permit 235,551.57 123,895.53 2,626.85 - 5,428.00 5,428.00 N/A 001 General Fund 3836 Refund Transaction Fee 1,245.00 975.00 1,125.00 465.00 1,500.00 1,035.00 222.58% 001 General Fund 3837 Returned Check Charge 873.00 773.00 50.00 1,000.00 200.00 (800.00) -80.00% 001 General Fund 3838 Sale of Maps/Publications 57.00 57.00 - - - - N/A 001 General Fund 3839 Photocopy Charges 298.00 122.80 139.00 300.00 300.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3840 Ambulance Transport 717,106.22 354,890.28 256,400.34 597,213.00 525,000.00 (72,213.00) -12.09% 001 General Fund 3841 Police Towing 86,810.00 41,610.00 48,357.00 84,750.00 85,226.00 476.00 0.56% 001 General Fund 3842 Parking Meters 1,812,847.38 1,069,962.26 869,271.42 1,216,953.00 1,553,708.00 336,755.00 27.67% 001 General Fund 3843 Parking Permits-Annual 380,916.00 27,006.00 26,878.00 387,000.00 387,000.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3844 Daily Parking Permits 1,666.00 943.00 1,685.00 2,000.00 3,700.00 1,700.00 85.00% 001 General Fund 3845 Lot A Revenue 395,539.00 259,027.25 207,932.00 250,014.00 317,142.00 67,128.00 26.85% 001 General Fund 3846 North Pier Parking Structure Revenue 456,686.25 342,692.00 155,306.75 320,896.00 273,305.00 (47,591.00) -14.83% 001 General Fund 3847 In Lieu Fee / Parking Facility - - 57,800.00 57,800.00 57,800.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3848 Driveway Permits 3,508.00 1,942.00 1,754.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3849 Guest Permits 1,103.00 916.00 159.00 622.00 622.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3850 Contractors Permits 55,828.00 38,216.00 23,426.00 40,000.00 40,000.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 3851 Cash Key Revenue (48.00) (35.75) 142.50 - - - N/A 001 General Fund 3852 Recreation Program Transaction Fee 30,427.37 21,495.00 17,910.00 26,475.00 47,000.00 20,525.00 77.53% 001 General Fund 3855 Bus Passes 507.25 370.50 - 900.00 - (900.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3856 500' - 2nd Noticing 2,691.00 2,691.00 - 1,653.00 1,116.00 (537.00) -32.49% 001 General Fund 3857 Parking Plan Application 3,467.25 4,623.00 9,246.00 9,246.00 13,924.00 4,678.00 50.59% 001 General Fund 3858 Monthly Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 100,920.00 60,822.00 36,952.00 47,393.00 61,412.00 14,019.00 29.58% 001 General Fund 3859 Admin Permit - Abandon CUP - - - 662.00 - (662.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3862 Alarm Permit Fee 3,386.00 2,321.00 2,478.00 5,565.00 3,150.00 (2,415.00) -43.40% 3 2020-21 Revenue Detail Report Funds Funds Name Acct Code Account Name 2020 Actual 2020 YTD Through December 2021 YTD Through December 2021 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Estimate Increase/ (Decrease) % Change 001 General Fund 3863 False Alarm Fee - - - - - - N/A 001 General Fund 3865 Lot B Revenue 74,199.25 45,928.00 50,579.50 47,328.00 78,849.00 31,521.00 66.60% 001 General Fund 3867 Precise Development Plans 10,944.00 - 10,406.00 16,147.00 10,406.00 (5,741.00) -35.55% 001 General Fund 3868 Public Noticing/300 Ft Radius 808.00 1,616.00 4,992.00 4,160.00 6,676.00 2,516.00 60.48% 001 General Fund 3877 Business License Application Fee 12,814.00 7,039.00 5,347.00 6,166.00 9,700.00 3,534.00 57.31% 001 General Fund 3879 Business License Renewal Fee 37,251.78 17,727.00 21,493.00 14,231.00 30,000.00 15,769.00 110.81% 001 General Fund 3880 Insurance Service Charges - - - 2,080.00 - (2,080.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3881 Tobacco Retailer Renewal - - - 4,956.00 - (4,956.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3883 Final/Tentative Map Extension 1,016.00 - 1,016.00 1,016.00 2,044.00 1,028.00 101.18% 001 General Fund 3884 Lot Line Adjustment - - - 6,874.00 - (6,874.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3886 Text Amendment/Private - - - 5,847.00 - (5,847.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3888 Slope/Grade Height Determination, Appeals 15,979.00 4,327.00 2,913.00 8,739.00 8,809.00 70.00 0.80% 001 General Fund 3890 300 Ft Radius Noticing/Appeal to CC - - - 248.00 251.00 3.00 1.21% 001 General Fund 3891 Appeal of Plng Comm Action to Council - - - 2,577.00 - (2,577.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3893 Contract Recreation Classes 344,542.05 208,930.80 218,454.00 266,570.00 339,000.00 72,430.00 27.17% 001 General Fund 3894 Other Recreation Programs 137,480.73 65,251.40 3,975.00 153,810.00 9,000.00 (144,810.00) -94.15% 001 General Fund 3895 Zoning Information Letters 392.00 193.00 - 597.00 201.00 (396.00) -66.33% 001 General Fund 3896 Mailing Fee - - - -- - N/A 001 General Fund 3897 Admin Fee/TULIP Ins Certificate 1,161.72 589.26 - 750.00 - (750.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 3899 Condo - CUP/PDP 10,102.00 10,102.00 14,937.50 20,812.00 35,998.00 15,186.00 72.97% Total Current Service Charges 5,979,638.15 3,294,395.90 2,533,763.81 4,527,478.00 4,804,972.00 277,494.00 001 General Fund 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 5,324.00 5,487.00 - - 7,320.00 7,320.00 N/A 001 General Fund 3903 Contributions Non Govt 4,767.00 4,764.00 - - 500.00 500.00 N/A 001 General Fund 3904 General Miscellaneous (31,607.32) 442.27 6,237.70 - 6,388.00 6,388.00 N/A 001 General Fund 3907 Pkg Str Utility Reimb From Beach House 5,652.62 1,793.42 1,879.24 4,100.00 5,600.00 1,500.00 36.59% 001 General Fund 3908 Hermosa Sr Ctr Donations/Memberships 5,665.50 3,452.00 437.50 3,045.00 600.00 (2,445.00) -80.30% 001 General Fund 3914 Planning EIR Admin Reimbursement 27,612.41 6,974.34 954.95 5,000.00 1,410.00 (3,590.00) -71.80% 001 General Fund 3938 Solid Waste Contract Admin Fee 51,780.55 23,339.90 23,844.05 54,000.00 57,226.00 3,226.00 5.97% 001 General Fund 3960 Frontier PEG Grant-formerly Verizon 8,671.25 - - - 14,000.00 14,000.00 N/A Total Other Revenue 77,866.01 46,252.93 33,353.44 66,145.00 93,044.00 26,899.00 001 General Fund 6801 Mural Review 1,558.00 1,558.00 484.00 3,210.00 968.00 (2,242.00) -69.84% 001 General Fund 6803 General Plan Amendment/ Map or Text - - 991.75 5,341.00 992.00 (4,349.00) -81.43% 001 General Fund 6804 Temporary Use Permit 533.00 533.00 - - - - N/A 001 General Fund 6808 Request for Reasonable Accomodation 895.00 895.00 - - - - N/A 001 General Fund 6809 Categorical Exemption 2,853.00 1,689.00 2,509.00 4,825.00 4,825.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 6810 Deed Restriction/Covenant Review 2,807.00 1,372.00 2,121.00 11,312.00 11,312.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 6811 Landscape Plan Review 6,236.00 3,234.00 3,952.00 6,080.00 6,080.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 6813 Zoning Code Interpretation Review 2,764.72 1,040.00 931.00 1,995.00 1,995.00 - 0.00% 4 2020-21 Revenue Detail Report Funds Funds Name Acct Code Account Name 2020 Actual 2020 YTD Through December 2021 YTD Through December 2021 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Estimate Increase/ (Decrease) % Change 001 General Fund 6818 New/Modified Business Zoning Review 8,942.00 4,682.00 3,896.00 9,900.00 9,900.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 6819 Historic Resource Review 2,273.00 - 839.00 - 839.00 839.00 N/A 001 General Fund 6820 Appeal to the Planning Commission - - - - - - N/A 001 General Fund 6821 Solar Plan Check/Inspection 4,175.54 2,129.56 3,144.00 2,086.00 5,000.00 2,914.00 139.69% 001 General Fund 6822 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 128.00 128.00 132.00 330.00 330.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 6825 Clean Bay Restaurant - NPDES Inspection - - 8,800.00 20,600.00 20,600.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 6828 Public Improvement Plan Check 50,765.00 24,062.00 34,351.00 37,913.00 50,000.00 12,087.00 31.88% 001 General Fund 6832 DUI Collision Response 772.88 772.88 858.76 1,039.00 1,039.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 6834 Citation Sign-off 337.00 288.00 49.00 735.00 249.00 (486.00) -66.12% 001 General Fund 6836 Police Business Background Check - - - 281.00 - (281.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 6837 Deceased Animal Pickup 59.00 59.00 61.00 122.00 123.00 1.00 0.82% 001 General Fund 6839 Pet Home Quarantine Review - - - 61.00 62.00 1.00 1.64% 001 General Fund 6840 Multiple Dog Review 339.00 224.00 345.00 460.00 461.00 1.00 0.22% 001 General Fund 6847 Document Certification - - - - - - N/A 001 General Fund 6851 Business License State Mandated Fee 9,297.20 4,905.40 5,231.40 4,095.00 9,623.00 5,528.00 134.99% 001 General Fund 6860 Refuse Lien Fees/Athens 1,802.49 2,133.73 5,071.71 336.00 336.00 - 0.00% 001 General Fund 6861 Oversized Vehicle Permits 609.00 258.00 485.00 660.00 755.00 95.00 14.39% 001 General Fund 6866 Records Technology Fee - - - - - - N/A 001 General Fund 6867 Credit Card Processing Fee 71,542.71 38,480.09 43,640.58 31,111.00 76,700.00 45,589.00 146.54% 001 General Fund 6871 Sewer Service Charge Rebate (11,314.29) (5,108.42) (4,778.60) (14,743.00) (11,000.00) 3,743.00 -25.39% 001 General Fund 6873 Impound Fee- Bicycle, Scooters & Wheeled - - - 139.00 - (139.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 6874 Limited Live Entertainment Permit Fee - - - 514.00 - (514.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 6881 Public Tree Removal Permit - - - - 800.00 800.00 N/A 001 General Fund 6883 Stort-term Vacation Rental Permit - - 3,470.00 17,350.00 5,226.00 (12,124.00) -69.88% 001 General Fund 6884 M-1 Limited Event Permit - - - 771.00 - (771.00) -100.00% 001 General Fund 6885 Temporary Outdoor Dining/Retail Permit 4,062.68 - 15,940.00 - 15,940.00 15,940.00 N/A 001 General Fund 6886 Minor Conditional Use Permit - - - - 4,414.00 4,414.00 N/A Total Current Service Charges Cont.161,437.93 83,335.24 132,524.60 146,523.00 217,569.00 71,046.00 001 General Fund Total General Fund 39,091,036.08 16,817,555.10 15,676,910.79 35,954,131.00 37,728,044.65 1,773,913.65 4.93% 105 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 3101 Current Year Secured 452,437.85 183,739.56 183,921.94 456,000.00 453,000.00 (3,000.00) -0.66% 105 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 3103 Prior Year Collections 4,076.01 3,062.53 4,184.85 5,000.00 4,000.00 (1,000.00) -20.00% 105 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 3105 Assessment Rebates (2,977.91) (1,230.58) (1,181.28) (3,200.00) (2,900.00) 300.00 -9.38% 105 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 3401 Interest Income 367.70 34.95 261.79 - 122.47 122.47 N/A 105 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 3450 Investment Discount 0.19 0.09 0.08 - 0.12 0.12 N/A 105 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund Total Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 453,903.84 185,606.55 187,187.38 457,800.00 454,222.59 (3,577.41) -0.78% 5 2020-21 Revenue Detail Report Funds Funds Name Acct Code Account Name 2020 Actual 2020 YTD Through December 2021 YTD Through December 2021 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Estimate Increase/ (Decrease) % Change 115 State Gas Tax Fund 3401 Interest Income 8,559.60 3,823.39 3,762.21 7,041.00 5,265.70 (1,775.30) -25.21% 115 State Gas Tax Fund 3450 Investment Discount 2.96 1.47 2.04 2.00 5.14 3.14 157.00% 115 State Gas Tax Fund 3501 Section 2106 Allocation 62,217.84 34,215.47 32,381.77 68,816.00 63,542.00 (5,274.00) -7.66% 115 State Gas Tax Fund 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 127,836.35 68,288.72 72,673.93 136,189.00 134,375.00 (1,814.00) -1.33% 115 State Gas Tax Fund 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 - 0.00% 115 State Gas Tax Fund 3512 Section 2105 (Prop 111)101,241.24 55,772.92 52,633.39 114,075.00 105,865.00 (8,210.00) -7.20% 115 State Gas Tax Fund 3513 Sec 2103 Higher Mtr Veh Excise Tax(HUTA)136,852.38 82,669.06 77,180.17 175,950.00 153,591.00 (22,359.00) -12.71% 115 State Gas Tax Fund 3522 TDA Article 3/Local 32,149.00 - - - - - N/A 115 State Gas Tax Fund 3566 Coastal Conservancy Grant 22,312.38 - - - - - N/A 115 State Gas Tax Fund 3567 Road Maintenance Rehab Account 343,747.53 126,879.74 121,600.00 374,847.00 354,189.00 (20,658.00) -5.51% 115 State Gas Tax Fund Total State Gas Tax Fund 838,919.28 375,650.77 364,233.51 880,920.00 820,832.84 (60,087.16) -6.82% 117 AB939 Fund 3401 Interest Income 1,378.19 1,277.76 (100.43) 2,128.00 1,396.54 (731.46) -34.37% 117 AB939 Fund 3450 Investment Discount 0.85 0.45 0.51 1.00 1.36 0.36 36.00% 117 AB939 Fund 3860 Car2Go Parking Fee / AB939 Surcharge 65,585.12 27,321.63 26,174.29 61,528.00 61,528.00 - 0.00% 117 AB939 Fund Total AB939 Fund 66,964.16 28,599.84 26,074.37 63,657.00 62,925.90 (731.10) -1.15% 121 Prop A Open Space Fund 3608 Maintenance Allocation - - - 20,557.00 51,160.22 30,603.22 148.87% 121 Prop A Open Space Fund Total Prop A Open Space Fund - - - 20,557.00 51,160.22 30,603.22 148.87% 122 Tyco Fund 3401 Interest Income 30,707.65 16,368.34 10,399.87 26,379.00 15,494.37 (10,884.63) -41.26% 122 Tyco Fund 3426 Easement Agreement 337,932.00 168,966.00 168,966.00 348,070.00 348,070.00 - 0.00% 122 Tyco Fund 3450 Investment Discount 9.54 5.30 5.65 8.00 15.11 7.11 88.88% 122 Tyco Fund Total Tyco Fund 368,649.19 185,339.64 179,371.52 374,457.00 363,579.48 (10,877.52) -2.90% 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 3116 Parks & Recreation Facility Tax 7,793.00 - - - - - N/A 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 3401 Interest Income 8,787.75 4,942.38 2,672.99 8,107.00 4,070.20 (4,036.80) -49.79% 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 3450 Investment Discount 2.79 1.65 1.47 2.00 3.97 1.97 98.50% 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 3910 Park/Recreation In Lieu Fee 17,216.00 12,606.00 66,010.00 78,616.00 78,616.00 - 0.00% 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 33,799.54 17,550.03 68,684.46 86,725.00 82,690.17 (4,034.83) -4.65% 135 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 3401 Interest Income 108.41 48.89 30.10 93.00 52.13 (40.87) -43.95% 135 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 3450 Investment Discount - - - - 0.05 0.05 N/A 135 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 - 0.00% 135 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund Total Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 4,608.41 4,548.89 4,530.10 4,593.00 4,552.18 (40.82) -0.89% 138 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 3401 Interest Income 80.25 66.70 - 131.00 3.12 (127.88) -97.62% 138 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 80.25 66.70 - 131.00 3.12 (127.88) -97.62% 6 2020-21 Revenue Detail Report Funds Funds Name Acct Code Account Name 2020 Actual 2020 YTD Through December 2021 YTD Through December 2021 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Estimate Increase/ (Decrease) % Change 139 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 3401 Interest Income 96.22 45.44 24.67 85.00 43.91 (41.09) -48.34% 139 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 3450 Investment Discount - - - - 0.04 0.04 N/A 139 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 - 0.00% 139 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 3,596.22 3,545.44 3,524.67 3,585.00 3,543.95 (41.05) -1.15% 140 Community Dev Block Grant 3720 Americans with Disabilities Act 150,572.95 - - 172,487.00 130,337.00 (42,150.00) -24.44% 140 Community Dev Block Grant Total Community Dev Block Grand Fund 150,572.95 - - 172,487.00 130,337.00 (42,150.00) -24.44% 145 Proposition A Fund 3117 Proposition A Transit 382,263.01 202,129.24 194,719.82 418,330.00 366,972.00 (51,358.00) -12.28% 145 Proposition A Fund 3401 Interest Income 9,926.06 5,282.10 3,985.26 19,807.00 5,452.46 (14,354.54) -72.47% 145 Proposition A Fund 3450 Investment Discount 4.42 3.06 2.15 - 5.32 5.32 N/A 145 Proposition A Fund 3853 Dial-A-Taxi Program 3,350.00 2,360.00 510.00 3,500.00 728.00 (2,772.00) -79.20% 145 Proposition A Fund 3855 Bus Passes 316.70 204.90 - 500.00 - (500.00) -100.00% 145 Proposition A Fund Total Proposition A Fund 395,860.19 209,979.30 199,217.23 442,137.00 373,157.78 (68,979.22) -15.60% 146 Proposition C Fund 3118 Proposition C Local Return 317,088.16 167,667.50 161,513.72 346,993.00 304,404.00 (42,589.00) -12.27% 146 Proposition C Fund 3401 Interest Income 22,512.99 11,194.69 8,220.53 21,725.00 12,270.29 (9,454.71) -43.52% 146 Proposition C Fund 3450 Investment Discount 6.04 2.71 4.50 7.00 11.97 4.97 71.00% 146 Proposition C Fund Total Proposition C Fund 339,607.19 178,864.90 169,738.75 368,725.00 316,686.26 (52,038.74) -14.11% 147 Measure R Fund 3119 Measure R Local Return Funds 237,475.80 125,664.06 121,504.11 260,272.00 230,352.00 (29,920.00) -11.50% 147 Measure R Fund 3401 Interest Income 10,531.04 6,603.56 2,580.25 13,914.00 4,036.86 (9,877.14) -70.99% 147 Measure R Fund 3450 Investment Discount 3.83 2.64 1.38 4.00 3.94 (0.06) -1.50% 147 Measure R Fund 3970 Measure R SBCCOG South Bay Highway - - - - 243,000.00 243,000.00 N/A 147 Measure R Fund Total Measure R Fund 248,010.67 132,270.26 124,085.74 274,190.00 477,392.80 (39,797.20) -14.51% 148 Measure M 3131 Measure M Local Return Funds 267,088.86 140,976.75 138,129.93 294,944.00 261,747.00 (33,197.00) -11.26% 148 Measure M 3401 Interest Income 3,192.52 1,515.65 1,138.68 4,547.00 1,728.25 (2,818.75) -61.99% 148 Measure M 3450 Investment Discount 1.36 0.87 0.62 1.00 1.69 0.69 69.00% 148 Measure M Total Measure M Fund 270,282.74 142,493.27 139,269.23 299,492.00 263,476.94 (36,015.06) -12.03% 149 Measure W Fund 3132 Measure W Local Returns - - 157,164.43 160,000.00 160,000.00 - 0.00% 149 Measure W Fund 3401 Interest Income - - 44.85 - 18.64 18.64 N/A 149 Measure W Fund 3450 Investment Discount - - 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 N/A 149 Measure W Fund Total Measure W Fund - - 157,209.30 160,000.00 160,018.66 18.66 0.01% 150 Grant Fund 3558 Beverage Recycling Grant 5,203.00 - - 5,300.00 5,300.00 - 0.00% 150 Grant Fund 3562 State Homeland Security Grant Program 63,640.00 - - 70,199.00 169,516.00 99,317.00 141.48% 150 Grant Fund 3566 Coastal Conservancy Grant - - - - - - N/A 150 Grant Fund 3585 BSCC Mental Health Training - - - 1,970.00 1,970.00 - 0.00% 7 2020-21 Revenue Detail Report Funds Funds Name Acct Code Account Name 2020 Actual 2020 YTD Through December 2021 YTD Through December 2021 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Estimate Increase/ (Decrease) % Change 150 Grant Fund 3590 SB 2 Zoning Ord Update Grant - - - 240,000.00 160,000.00 (80,000.00) -33.33% 150 Grant Fund 3591 Local Early Action Planning - - - 65,000.00 65,000.00 - 0.00% 150 Grant Fund 3592 Coastal Conservancy Grant- Lot D - - - 499,650.00 499,650.00 - 0.00% 150 Grant Fund 3736 Bulletproof Vest Partnership - - - 2,400.00 2,400.00 - 0.00% 150 Grant Fund 3750 Dept of Justice- Body Worn Cameras - - - - - - N/A 150 Grant Fund 3751 DOJ Tobacco Law Enforcement Grant 7,752.82 1,810.64 - - - - N/A 150 Grant Fund 3971 LA Country Library - - - 60,000.00 - (60,000.00) -100.00% 150 Grant Fund 3973 Caltrans Cooperative Agreement PCH&2nd 188,193.58 - - - - - N/A 150 Grant Fund 3984 Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program - - - 36,656.00 36,656.00 - 0.00% 150 Grant Fund 3985 California Green Business Program 20,000.00 20,000.00 18,581.77 27,500.00 - (27,500.00) -100.00% 150 Grant Fund 3986 Caltrans Adaptation Planning Grant - - - - 247,050.00 247,050.00 N/A 150 Grant Fund 3992 BCHD-Domestic Violence Advocate Grant - - - - 10,000.00 10,000.00 N/A 150 Grant Fund 3992 BCHD-Domestic Violence Advocate Grant - - - - 10,000.00 10,000.00 N/A 150 Grant Fund 3562 State Homeland Security Grant Program - - - - - - N/A 150 Grant Fund 3971 LA Country Library - - - - - - N/A 150 Grant Fund 3985 California Green Business Program - - - - - - N/A 150 Grant Fund Total Grant Fund 284,789.40 21,810.64 18,581.77 1,008,675.00 1,207,542.00 198,867.00 19.72% 152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 3401 Interest Income 643.86 86.26 456.39 388.00 623.96 235.96 60.81% 152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 3450 Investment Discount 0.20 0.03 0.24 - 0.61 0.61 N/A 152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 3538 AQMD Emission Control AB2766 25,019.61 6,437.45 6,554.39 25,000.00 25,000.00 - 0.00% 152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 3551 MSRC Discretionary Matching Funds 36,000.00 - - - - - N/A 152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 61,663.67 6,523.74 7,011.02 25,388.00 25,624.57 236.57 0.93% 153 Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)3135 C.O.P.S. Allocation 128,413.99 101,317.33 102,245.64 100,000.00 102,246.00 2,246.00 2.25% 153 Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)3401 Interest Income 8,042.01 4,218.79 2,439.13 7,076.00 3,908.19 (3,167.81) -44.77% 153 Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)3450 Investment Discount 2.56 1.40 1.34 2.00 3.81 1.81 90.50% 153 Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)Total Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)136,458.56 105,537.52 104,686.11 107,078.00 106,158.00 (920.00) -0.86% 160 Sewer Fund 3401 Interest Income 155,624.03 93,417.60 30,230.42 153,280.00 56,593.80 (96,686.20) -63.08% 160 Sewer Fund 3450 Investment Discount 49.88 31.07 17.52 47.00 55.20 8.20 17.45% 160 Sewer Fund 3550 CA Waste Oil Recycling Grant - - - 5,475.00 5,475.00 - 0.00% 160 Sewer Fund 3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance 10,222.10 - - 8,000.00 8,000.00 - 0.00% 160 Sewer Fund 3828 Sewer Connection Fee 10,604.00 5,994.00 3,656.00 27,000.00 14,000.00 (13,000.00) -48.15% 160 Sewer Fund 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 2,624.00 1,161.00 1,330.00 2,302.00 2,302.00 - 0.00% 160 Sewer Fund 3832 Sewer Lateral Installation 15,111.00 9,792.00 7,697.00 14,768.00 14,768.00 - 0.00% 160 Sewer Fund 6861 Sewer Service Charge 1,081,397.39 442,276.96 447,346.60 1,080,269.00 1,071,875.00 (8,394.00) -0.78% 160 Sewer Fund Total Sewer Fund 1,275,632.40 552,672.63 490,277.54 1,291,141.00 1,173,069.00 (118,072.00) -9.14% 8 2020-21 Revenue Detail Report Funds Funds Name Acct Code Account Name 2020 Actual 2020 YTD Through December 2021 YTD Through December 2021 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Estimate Increase/ (Decrease) % Change 161 Storm Drains 3401 Interest Income 38,621.61 21,485.69 14,604.18 31,754.00 20,038.10 (11,715.90) -36.90% 161 Storm Drains 3450 Investment Discount 5.35 - 7.20 10.00 19.54 9.54 95.40% 161 Storm Drains Total Storm Drains Fund 38,626.96 21,485.69 14,611.38 31,764.00 20,057.64 (11,706.36) -36.85% 170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 3307 Department of Justice Forfeited Funds 75,240.75 - 3,774.10 - 3,774.00 3,774.00 N/A 170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 3401 Interest Income 14,279.35 7,669.77 4,412.74 12,718.00 6,925.56 (5,792.44) -45.55% 170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 3450 Investment Discount 4.50 2.53 2.49 4.00 6.75 2.75 68.75% 170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 89,524.60 7,672.30 8,189.33 12,722.00 10,706.31 (2,015.69) -15.84% 180 Fire Protection Fund 3401 Interest Income 1,015.62 680.17 97.53 1,212.00 261.77 (950.23) -78.40% 180 Fire Protection Fund 3912 Fire Flow Fee 10,294.23 5,680.53 6,482.93 40,517.00 35,000.00 (5,517.00) -13.62% 180 Fire Protection Fund Total Fire Protection Fund 11,309.85 6,360.70 6,580.46 41,729.00 35,261.77 (6,467.23) -15.50% 190 RTI Undersea Cable 3401 Interest Income 11,073.80 5,908.40 4,969.66 9,642.00 6,463.71 (3,178.29) -32.96% 190 RTI Undersea Cable 3426 Easement Agreement 67,500.00 22,500.00 45,000.00 90,000.00 90,000.00 - 0.00% 190 RTI Undersea Cable 3427 Cell Site License - - 264,000.00 18,000.00 18,000.00 - 0.00% 190 RTI Undersea Cable 3428 Cell Site License - Verizon - - - 253,000.00 253,000.00 - 0.00% 190 RTI Undersea Cable 3450 Investment Discount 3.48 1.93 2.46 3.00 6.30 3.30 110.00% 190 RTI Undersea Cable Total RTI Undersea Cable Fund 78,577.28 28,410.33 313,972.12 370,645.00 367,470.01 (3,174.99) -0.86% 191 RTI Tidelands 3401 Interest Income 6,306.30 3,486.77 2,796.47 5,790.00 3,593.45 (2,196.55) -37.94% 191 RTI Tidelands 3426 Easement Agreement - - 192,000.00 184,000.00 184,000.00 - 0.00% 191 RTI Tidelands 3450 Investment Discount 1.80 1.02 1.34 2.00 3.50 1.50 75.00% 191 RTI Tidelands Total RTI Tidelands Fund 6,308.10 3,487.79 194,797.81 189,792.00 187,596.95 (2,195.05) -1.16% 301 Capital Improvement Fund 3401 Interest Income 236,994.09 127,058.00 65,663.81 203,336.00 109,491.48 (93,844.52) -46.15% 301 Capital Improvement Fund 3450 Investment Discount 72.13 39.72 36.93 63.00 106.79 43.79 69.51% 301 Capital Improvement Fund 3913 In-Lieu Fee/Street Pavement 11,245.00 11,245.00 - - - - N/A 301 Capital Improvement Fund Total Capital Improvement Fund 248,311.22 138,342.72 65,700.74 203,399.00 109,598.27 (93,800.73) -46.12% 313 Greenwich Village N Utility Undergrnd Im 3940 Cash Payments/Utility Undergrounding - - 62,324.80 - 120,898.00 120,898.00 N/A 313 Greenwich Village N Utility Undergrnd Im Total Greenwich Village N Utility Undergrnd Im - - 62,324.80 - 120,898.00 120,898.00 N/A 609 Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2 3401 Interest Income 2,478.65 1,211.39 589.30 2,390.00 1,119.58 (1,270.42) -53.16% 609 Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2 3450 Investment Discount - - - - 1.09 1.09 N/A 609 Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2 Total Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2 2,478.65 1,211.39 589.30 2,390.00 1,120.67 (1,269.33) -53.11% 610 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund 3401 Interest Income 77.67 42.93 21.79 71.00 35.27 (35.73) -50.32% 610 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund 3450 Investment Discount - - - - 0.03 0.03 N/A 610 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund Total Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund 77.67 42.93 21.79 71.00 35.30 (35.70) -50.28% 9 2020-21 Revenue Detail Report Funds Funds Name Acct Code Account Name 2020 Actual 2020 YTD Through December 2021 YTD Through December 2021 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Estimate Increase/ (Decrease) % Change 611 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund 3401 Interest Income 1,172.94 568.09 370.25 1,157.00 626.03 (530.97) -45.89% 611 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund 3450 Investment Discount - - - - 0.61 0.61 N/A 611 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund 1,172.94 568.09 370.25 1,157.00 626.64 (530.36) -45.84% 612 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund 3401 Interest Income 114.06 63.07 32.01 105.00 51.81 (53.19) -50.66% 612 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund 3450 Investment Discount - - - - 0.05 0.05 N/A 612 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund 114.06 63.07 32.01 105.00 51.86 (53.14) -50.61% 619 Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2 3401 Interest Income 374.53 207.08 105.07 344.00 170.11 (173.89) -50.55% 619 Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2 3450 Investment Discount - - - - 0.17 0.17 N/A 619 Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2 Total Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2 374.53 207.08 105.07 344.00 170.28 (173.72) -50.50% 705 Insurance Fund 3880 Insurance Service Charges 2,707,639.00 1,353,834.00 1,375,128.00 2,750,236.00 2,750,236.00 - 0.00% 705 Insurance Fund 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 203,000.00 200,000.00 - - - - N/A 705 Insurance Fund 3904 General Miscellaneous - - - - - - N/A 705 Insurance Fund Total Insurance Fund 2,910,639.00 1,553,834.00 1,375,128.00 2,750,236.00 2,750,236.00 - N/A 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 3822 Building Maintenance Service Charges 101,556.00 50,778.00 50,778.00 101,556.00 101,556.00 - 0.00% 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 3885 Comm Equip/Business Mach Charges 843,689.00 421,848.00 423,906.00 847,796.00 847,796.00 - 0.00% 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 3889 Vehicle/Equip Replacement Charges 879,458.01 420,636.00 444,750.00 889,508.00 889,508.00 - 0.00% 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 38,879.19 29,095.57 867.50 - 868.00 868.00 N/A 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years - - - - - - N/A 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 3904 General Miscellaneous - - - - - - N/A 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 3962 Election/SCE Reimbursement - - - - - - N/A 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 6866 Records Technology Fee 88,420.70 49,219.51 47,834.87 87,973.00 87,973.00 - 0.00% 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Total Equipment Replacement Fund 1,952,002.90 971,577.08 968,136.37 1,926,833.00 1,927,701.00 868.00 - 10 Account Department Account Name Description 2020-21 Requests 001 General Fund 001-1121-4251 City Clerk Contract Services/Govt Estimate from the County for May 11, 2021 Special Election to fill vacant City Council position. 101,000.00 001-1201-4201 City Manager Contract Serv/Private The ambulance transport fees are based on the flat rate contract with McCormick Ambulance. The estimated January-June 2021 transport cost is $163,680 (372 transports x $440 per transport fee). Combining that estimate with the first half cost of $144,480 results in a total of $301,160, therefore an increase in the amount of $31,325 is requested. 31,325.00 001-1204-4201 Finance Cashier Contract Serv/Private Credit Card Merchant fees have increased with the shift from over the counter transactions and checks to credit card payments. Additionally, because revenue amounts exceeded expectations, correspondingly fees have increased. 39,664.00 001-2102-4201 Crossing Guard Contract Serv/Private Budget reduction to Crossing Guard Services as a result of Covid- 19 school closures. Although there is limited information regarding when Hermosa Beach schools will fully return to in- person instruction, schools are scheduled to return to limited in- school instruction starting February 2021. Based on the provided information, students from grades K through 2 will return on staggered schedules, requiring crossing guard services for at least 4.5 hours a day for 4 days a week. Additionally, the Hermosa Beach School District recently announced the opening of North School in April 2021, which will require additional guards for this location. The number of guards and hours per day is yet to be determined. The return of 3rd through 8th grade students is still unknown. However, based on current information, staff estimates an expenditure of ​up to $​120,000 ​to cover crossing guard expenditures through June 30, 2021. (80,970.00) 001-4202-4201 Public Works Admin Contract Serv/Private Request for funding to be used for ADA Consulting Services, which are critical to further development of a citywide ADA Program and compliance with Federal ADA mandates. 90,000.00 2020-21 Midyear Budget Review Additional Appropriations Report Attachment 2 1 Account Department Account Name Description 2020-21 Requests 001-4601-4201 Community Resources Contract Serv/Private Decrease contract services due to the cancellation of excursions ($10,000) and closure of the Community Theatre and 2nd Story Theatre no longer needing ticketing service ($250) through June 2021 due to COVID-19. (10,250.00) 001-4601-4302 Community Resources Advertising Decrease to advertising budget by eliminating budgeted amount for Surfers Walk of Fame ad. (1,000.00) 001-4601-4308 Community Resources Program Materials Decrease Programming Materials budget to $8,000 by removing $2,000 budgeted for the Postive, Active, Recreation for Kids! (PARK) After School Program and Excursions supplies due to cancellation of programs through June 2021 due to COVID-19. (2,000.00) 001-6101-4201 Parks Contract Serv/Private The Parks account was underbudgeted for the the annual landscape maintenance services agreement with Merchants Landscape. Due to a clerical error, tree trimming, replacing the ball field mix and replacing the wood chips on the Greenbelt were omitted. It should be noted that staff is pursuing revenue from Measure A (formerly Prop A Open Space) in the amount of $51,160. Documents are being submitted to LA County to receive the funds. The revenue was not anticipated at the beginning of the year and is being requested to cover costs for the maintenance of the Greenbelt. Funds for this maintenance usage were used in previous fiscal years. 70,000.00 General Fund Total 237,769.00 150 Grant Fund 150-1201-4201 City Manager Contract Serv/Private Consultant Services for Caltrans Adaptation Planning Grant. See agenda item 21-0118 on this agenda's Consent Calendar 247,050.00 150-2120-4201 St Homeland Security Prg- Radio Upgrades Contract Serv/Private Proposed 2019 State Homeland Security Grant award of $51,788 for radio upgrades. 51,788.00 150-2122-4112 BCHD- Domestic Violence Advocate Grant Part Time/Temporary Grant funds awarded to the City from Beach Cities Health District (BCHD) for a Domestic Violence Program. 10,000.00 Grant Fund Total 308,838.00 2 Account Department Account Name Description 2020-21 Requests 705 Insurance Fund 705-1133-4201 City Attorney- Litigation Contract Serv/Private Increase the Litigation budget based on the expenditures for the first five months of the year. The City spent $82,000 in five months or approximately $16,400 per month on cases expected to be ongoing the rest of the fiscal year. There is an available balance of $44,800, so the recommended increase is $70,000. 70,000.00 705-1209-4201 Liability Contract Serv/Private Increased cost of insurance premiums and claims administration over 2020-21 Budget estimate.104,120.00 705-1210-4201 Auto/Property/Bonds Contract Serv/Private Increased cost of insurance premium over 2020-21 Budget estimate.3,091.00 705-1215-4186 Unemployment Unemployment Claims Increase to Unemployment Benefits account based on claims year-to-date. Part time employees unemployment claims have risen due to Covid-19. 33,486.93 Insurance Fund Total 210,697.93 715 Capital Improvement Fund 715-2101-4311 Police Auto Maintenance Technical repairs for police department vehicles that are not able to be resolved by Public Work's staff are referred to the South Bay Regional Communications Authority (SBRPCA) for service. Historically, SBRPCA has invoiced the City for parts required to complete vehicle repairs. Labor for these repairs were provided as part of the City's contract with SBRPCA for dispatching services rather than in the repair invoice. In August 2020, the City entered into a new contract with SBRPCA which included a new cost allocation model for dispatch services, including quarterly invoicing from their Technical Services Division. Labor costs are now included in vehicle repair invoices. 26,000.00 715-3302-4311 Comm Services Auto Maintenance South Bay Regional Communications Authority (SBRPCA) labor costs for vehicle repairs. See description above. 4,000.00 Equipment Replacement Fund Total 30,000.00 3 Account Department Account Name Description 2020-21 Requests 147 Measure R Fund 147-8143-4201 CIP 143, PCH Mobility Improvement Project Contract Serv/Private Reduce project funding based on available Measure R funds.(130,000.00) Measure R Fund Total (130,000.00) 148 Measure M Fund 148-8191-4201 CIP 191, Annual Street Improvements Contract Serv/Private Reduce project funding based on available Measure M funds.(5,000.00) Measure M Fund Total (5,000.00) 190 RTI Fund 190-8695-4201 CIP 695, Parking Lot A Improvements Contract Serv/Private Reduce project funding based on available RTI funds. The timing of one cable activation changed. (40,000.00) RTI Fund Total (40,000.00) 191 RTI Tidelands Fund 191-8692-4201 CIP 692, 14th Street Beach Restroom Rehab Contract Serv/Private Reduce project funding based on available RTI Tideland funds. See above. (190,000.00) RTI Tidelands Fund Total (190,000.00) 301 Capital Improvement Fund 301-8160-4201 CIP 160, PCH Traffic Improvements Contract Serv/Private Project was estimated to be completed and closed out last fiscal year (2019-2020) so funds were not reappropriated. Funds are needed to complete the project which includes traffic improvements on PCH (at Pier Ave. and Aviation). Additional funding will address unforeseen conditions and added scope of work due to regulatory requirements. 160,000.00 301-8602-4201 CIP 602, Citywide ADA Improvements Contract Serv/Private Additional funds requested to purchase ADA tiles to be used for beach path extension during the summer months. 22,000.00 301-8603-4201 CIP 603, South Park Slope and Irrigation Repairs Contract Serv/Private This is a new CIP to address sloped areas around the playground area at South Park. This funding would be utilized to install interim measures in order to open up the area to the public and while the City pursues more permanent measures for repairs required of the entire park, including irrigation and landscaping. 35,000.00 301-8692-4201 CIP 692, 14th Street Beach Restroom Rehab Contract Serv/Private Reduce appropriation to CIP 692, 14th St Beach Restroom to cover the increase to CIP 602 Citywide ADA Improvements listed above. (22,000.00) Capital Improvement Fund Total 195,000.00 Capital Improvement Projects 4 TRANSFERS IN TRANSFERS OUT GENERAL FUND From Lighting/Landscaping Fund , Administration $11,054 From State Gas Tax Fund, Street Maintenance, Traffic Safety Operations $360,763 From Prop A Open Space Fund, Parks Maintenance Allocation $20,557 From Loma District Administrative Expense Fund, Agency Administration $34 From Beach Drive Assessment District Administrative Expense Fund, Agency Administration $1,891 From Bayview Drive Administrative Expense Fund, Agency Administration $2,307 From Sewer Fund, Return of Funds Transferred in 2014-15 $3,000,000 To Lighting/Landscaping Fund, Cover Deficit $291,002 To 2015 Lease Revenue Bond Fund, Bond Payment $785,699 To Storm Drain Fund, From Utility User Tax $700,000 FUND TOTALS $3,396,606 $1,776,701 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING FUND To General Fund, Administration $11,054 From General Fund, Cover Deficit $291,002 FUND TOTALS $291,002 $11,054 STATE GAS TAX FUND To General Fund, Street Maintenance, Traffic Safety Operations $360,763 FUND TOTALS $0 $360,763 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND To General Fund, Parks Maintenance Allocation $20,557 FUND TOTALS $0 $20,557 SEWER FUND To General Fund, Return Fund Transferred in 2014-15 $0 $3,000,000 FUND TOTALS $0 $3,000,000 BUDGET TRANSFERS 2020-21 MIDYEAR BUDGET 1 Attachment 3 TRANSFERS IN TRANSFERS OUT BUDGET TRANSFERS 2020-21 MIDYEAR BUDGET BAYVIEW DRIVE ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND To General Fund, Agency Administration $2,307 FUND TOTALS $0 $2,307 LOMA DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND To General Fund, Close out fund $34 FUND TOTALS $0 $34 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND To General Fund, Agency Administration $1,891 FUND TOTALS $0 $1,891 STORM DRAIN FUND From General Fund, From Utility User Tax $700,000 FUND TOTALS $700,000 $0 2015 LEASE REVENUE BOND FUND From General Fund, For Bond Payments $785,699 FUND TOTALS $785,699 $0 GRAND TOTALS $5,173,307 $5,173,307 2 Major Fund LIGHTING GENERAL LANDSCAPING STATE GAS FUND FUND TAX FUND 001 105 115 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes $28,969,523 $454,100 $0 Licenses/Permits $902,093 $0 $0 Fines/Forfeitures $1,978,497 $0 $0 Use of Money/Property $635,452 $123 $5,271 Intergovernmental/State $126,895 $0 $815,562 Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 Current Service Charges $5,022,541 $0 $0 Other Revenue $93,044 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $37,728,045 $454,223 $820,833 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $3,396,606 $291,002 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $41,124,651 $745,225 $820,833 FUND BALANCE 7/1/20 $13,122,834 $15,798 $512,852 CIP Carry Forward TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $54,247,485 $761,023 $1,333,685 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $39,379,438 $737,748 $0 Capital Outlay $59,741 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $322,395 $0 $942,627 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $39,761,574 $737,748 $942,627 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $1,776,701 $11,054 $360,763 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $41,538,275 $748,802 $1,303,390 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/21 $12,709,210 (a)$12,221 $30,295 (a) CLASSIFICATIONS OF FUND BALANCE: Restricted Previous Balance Current Balance General Plan Maintenance Fee -$93,344 $13,388 Verizon PEG Grant $26,932 $70,969 Chamber Donation- Christmas Decorations $19,909 $0 CASP Fees $28,587 $38,204 Marquee Donation $50,000 $50,000 Committed In Lieu Fee/ Parking Facility $86,700 $86,700 Assigned Contingencies $6,212,416 $6,300,710 Unspecified Contingencies $90,739 $0 Retirement Rate Stabilization $1,021,575 $1,021,575 Retirement Trust- Continue to fund at 73%$829,060 $829,060 $267,950 $267,950 Prop A Fund Exchange- Engineer Funding $579,194 $455,549 $152,746 $0 Reserve for Future Facility Costs (PERS Savings)$86,113 $0 $9,358,577 $9,134,105 Unassigned (19-20)$1,751,688 Available Fund Balance 6/30/21 $1,823,416 $12,221 $30,295 Compensated Absences Reserve for Future Facility Costs (TOT Increase) Special Revenue Funds 2020-21 2020-21 Midyear Budget CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 1 Attachment 4 PROP A AB 939 OPEN SPACE TYCO FUND FUND FUND 117 121 122 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes $0 $0 $0 Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 Use of Money/Property $1,397 $0 $363,579 Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/County $0 $51,160 $0 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 Current Service Charges $61,528 $0 $0 Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $62,925 $51,160 $363,579 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $62,925 $51,160 $363,579 FUND BALANCE 7/1/20 $118,810 $14,360 $1,405,161 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $181,734 $65,520 $1,768,740 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $19,599 $0 $0 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $0 $1,261,856 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $19,599 $0 $1,261,856 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $20,557 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $19,599 $20,557 $1,261,856 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/21 $162,135 $44,963 $506,884 Available Fund Balance 6/30/21 $162,135 $44,963 $506,884 Special Revenue Funds 2020-21 2020-21 Midyear Budget CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 2 PARK/BAYVIEW DRIVE LOMA DISTRICT RECREATION DISTRICT ADMIN ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITY TAX EXPENSE EXPENSE FUND FUND FUND 125 135 138 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes $0 $0 $0 Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 Use of Money/Property $4,074 $52 $3 Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 Current Service Charges $0 $0 $0 Other Revenue $78,616 $4,500 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $82,690 $4,552 $3 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $82,690 $4,552 $3 FUND BALANCE 7/1/20 $355,925 $3,938 $31 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $438,615 $8,490 $34 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $0 $1,400 $0 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $337,031 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $337,031 $1,400 $0 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $2,307 $34 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $337,031 $3,707 $34 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/21 $101,584 $4,783 $0 Available Fund Balance 6/30/21 $101,584 $4,783 $0 Special Revenue Funds 2020-21 2020-21 Midyear Budget CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 3 BEACH DRIVE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMMUNITY / DEV PROPOSITION PROPOSITION EXPENSE BLOCK GRANT A C FUND FUND FUND 139 140 145 146 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes $0 $0 $366,972 $304,404 Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $0 Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $0 Use of Money/Property $44 $0 $5,458 $12,282 Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $130,337 $0 $0 Current Service Charges $0 $0 $728 $0 Other Revenue $3,500 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $3,544 $130,337 $373,158 $316,686 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $3,544 $130,337 $373,158 $316,686 FUND BALANCE 7/1/20 $3,122 $4,671 $407,357 $1,061,016 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $6,666 $135,008 $780,515 $1,377,702 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $1,550 $0 $198,296 $0 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $135,008 $0 $1,260,000 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $1,550 $135,008 $198,296 $1,260,000 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $1,891 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $3,441 $135,008 $198,296 $1,260,000 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/21 $3,225 $0 $582,219 $117,702 Available Fund Balance 6/30/21 $3,225 $0 $582,219 $117,702 Special Revenue Funds 2020-21 2020-21 Midyear Budget CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 4 MEASURE R MEASURE M MEASURE W GRANT FUND FUND FUND FUND 147 148 149 150 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes $230,352 $261,747 $160,000 $0 Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $0 Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $0 Use of Money/Property $4,041 $1,730 $19 $0 Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 $901,436 Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 $2,400 Current Service Charges $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Revenue $243,000 $0 $0 $303,706 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $477,393 $263,477 $160,019 $1,207,542 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $477,393 $263,477 $160,019 $1,207,542 FUND BALANCE 7/1/20 $279,026 $78,134 $0 $425,731 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $756,419 $341,611 $160,019 $1,633,273 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $0 $0 $0 $899,613 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $756,139 $339,572 $140,000 $676,469 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $756,139 $339,572 $140,000 $1,576,082 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $756,139 $339,572 $140,000 $1,576,082 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/21 $280 $2,039 $20,019 $57,191 Available Fund Balance 6/30/21 $280 $2,039 $20,019 $57,191 2020-21 2020-21 Midyear Budget CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 5 2020-21 SUPPLEMENTAL AIR QUALITY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSET SEIZURE/ IMPROVEMENT SERVICES SEWER STORM DRAIN FORFEITURE FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND 152 153 160 161 170 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes $0 $102,246 $0 $0 $0 Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Use of Money/Property $624 $3,912 $56,649 $20,058 $10,706 Intergovernmental/State $25,000 $0 $5,475 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $8,000 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Current Service Charges $0 $0 $1,102,945 $0 $0 Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $25,624 $106,158 $1,173,069 $20,058 $10,706 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $25,624 $106,158 $1,173,069 $720,058 $10,706 FUND BALANCE 7/1/20 $76,278 $339,327 $5,327,584 $1,733,256 $637,078 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $101,902 $445,485 $6,500,653 $2,453,314 $647,785 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $48,000 $107,611 $491,362 $437,260 $6,175 Capital Outlay $0 $33,993 $0 $0 $58,259 Capital Improvements $0 0 $2,472,822 $1,975,287 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $48,000 $141,604 $2,964,184 $2,412,547 $64,434 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $48,000 $141,604 $5,964,184 $2,412,547 $64,434 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/21 $53,902 $303,881 $536,469 $40,766 $583,351 Available Fund Balance 6/30/21 53,902 $303,881 $536,469 $40,766 $583,351 Special Revenue Fd 2020-21 2020-21 Midyear Budget CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 6 RTI FIRE RTI UNDERSEA CABLE PROTECTION UNDERSEA CABLE TIDELANDS FUND FUND FUND 180 190 191 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes $0 $0 $0 Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 Use of Money/Property $262 $367,470 $187,597 Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 Current Service Charges $0 $0 $0 Other Revenue $35,000 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $35,262 $367,470 $187,597 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $35,262 $367,470 $187,597 FUND BALANCE 7/1/20 $28,889 $470,818 $257,035 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $64,151 $838,288 $444,632 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $43,062 $0 $0 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $828,952 $440,000 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $43,062 $828,952 $440,000 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $43,062 $828,952 $440,000 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/21 $21,089 $9,336 $4,632 2021-22 Fire Equipment Conversion Costs (Payments 43-48 of 60)21,089.00 Available Fund Balance 6/30/21 $0 $9,336 $4,632 Special Revenue Fd 2020-21 2020-21 Midyear Budget CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 7 Debt Service Fd BAYVIEW DRIVE LOWER PIER 2015 CAPITAL GREENWICH DISTRICT DISTRICT LEASE REVENUE IMPROVEMENT VILLAGE N UNDERGROUND REDEMPTION REDEMPTION BOND FUND FUND UTILITIES FUND FUND 201 301 313 609 610 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Use of Money/Property $0 $109,598 $0 $1,121 $35 Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Current Service Charges $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Revenue $0 $0 $120,898 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $0 $109,598 $120,898 $1,121 $35 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $785,699 $0 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $785,699 $109,598 $120,898 $1,121 $35 FUND BALANCE 7/1/20 $143 $9,269,544 $0 $130,962 $3,224 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $785,842 $9,379,142 $120,898 $132,083 $3,259 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $0 $219,000 $0 $0 $0 Capital Outlay $0 $363,672 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $5,497,978 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 $6,080,650 $0 $0 $0 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $0 $6,080,650 $0 $0 $0 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT $785,712 $0 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/21 $130 $3,298,492 $120,898 $132,083 $3,259 Reserved for New Corporate City Yard Construction (with contingency)$953,000 Reserve for Capital Facilities $904,296 Available Fund Balance 6/30/21 $130 $1,441,196 $120,898 $132,083 $3,259 Special Revenue Fund Agency Funds 2020-21 2020-21 Midyear Budget CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 8 BEACH DRIVE BEACH DRIVE MYRTLE LOMA DISTRICT DISTRICT AVENUE DRIVE REDEMPTION RESERVE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FUND FUND FUND FUND 611 612 617 618 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes $0 $0 $0 $0 Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $0 Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $0 Use of Money/Property $627 $52 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 $0 Current Service Charges $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $627 $52 $0 $0 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $627 $52 $0 $0 FUND BALANCE 7/1/20 $64,991 $4,617 $42,787 $82,558 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $65,618 $4,669 $42,787 $82,558 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 $0 $0 $0 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/21 $65,618 $4,669 $42,787 $82,558 Available Fund Balance 6/30/21 $65,618 $4,669 $42,787 $82,558 Agency Funds 2020-21 2020-21 Midyear Budget CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 9 BAYVIEW DRIVE EQUIPMENT RESERVE INSURANCE REPLACEMENT TOTAL FUND FUND FUND (MEMORANDUM 619 705 715 ONLY) ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes $0 $0 $0 $30,849,344 Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $902,093 Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $1,978,497 Use of Money/Property $170 $0 $0 $1,792,405 Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 $1,874,368 Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $59,160 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 $132,737 Current Service Charges $0 $2,750,236 $1,927,701 $10,865,679 Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 $882,264 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $170 $2,750,236 $1,927,701 $49,336,547 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $5,173,307 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $170 $2,750,236 $1,927,701 $54,509,854 FUND BALANCE 7/1/20 $14,730 $2,643,790 $8,715,513 $47,651,889 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $14,900 $5,394,026 $10,643,214 $102,161,743 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $0 $2,960,927 $2,070,286 $47,621,327 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $1,050,815 $1,566,480 Capital Improvements $0 $0 $151,010 $17,537,146 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 $2,960,927 $3,272,111 $66,724,953 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $5,173,307 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $0 $2,960,927 $3,272,111 $71,898,260 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT $785,712 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR $1,050,815 $1,050,815 FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/21 $14,900 $2,433,099 $8,421,918 $30,528,586 Designated Building Maintenance Funds $628,441 Investment in Fixed Assets $5,999,459 Assigned reserve for Police Department Radio Equipment/South Bay $77,262 Interoperability Project. Anticipate completion in 2019-20 Available Fund Balance 6/30/21 $14,900 $2,433,099 $1,716,756 $9,235,829 Agency Fund Internal Service Funds 2020-21 2020-21 Midyear Budget CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 10 FY 2020-2021 CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE/TRAINING BUDGET SUMMARY CONFERENCE/TRAINING MASSEY DETOY ARMATO CAMPBELL FANGARY TOTAL ICA SUMMER SEMINAR (CANCELLED) (July 2020) CSUDH ANNUAL SOUTH BAY ECONOMIC FORECAST (VIRTUAL)$53.55 (10/1/20) LEAGUE OF CA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE & DIVISION MEETING (VIRTUAL)$50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 (10/7/20 - 10/9/20) CCCA SACRAMENTO LEGISLATIVE TOUR (VIRTUAL) (1/12/20, 1/21/20, 1/28/20, 2/4/20) ICA WINTER SEMINAR (VIRTUAL)$25.00 (2/20/20 - 2/23/20) SBCCOG GENERAL ASSEMBLY (VIRTUAL) (3/18/20) TOTAL EXPENSE:$103.55 $0.00 $75.00 $50.00 $50.00 $278.55 BUDGET:$5,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $17,000.00 REMAINING:$4,896.45 $3,000.00 $2,925.00 $2,950.00 $2,950.00 $16,721.45 Attachment 5 From:noreply@granicusideas.com To:Eduardo Sarmiento; City Council; Suja Lowenthal Subject:New eComment for Regular Meeting - 6:00 PM Closed Session - CANCELED Duly Posted on February 19, 2021 at 10:15 p.m. by E.S. Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:00:43 PM SpeakUpNew eComment for Regular Meeting - 6:00 PMClosed Session - CANCELED Duly Posted onFebruary 19, 2021 at 10:15 p.m. by E.S. dean francois submitted a new eComment. Meeting: Regular Meeting - 6:00 PM Closed Session - CANCELED Duly Posted on February 19, 2021 at 10:15 p.m. by E.S. Item: a. REPORT 21-0122 MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2020-21 (Finance Director Viki Copeland) eComment: Overall it looks like we are in good shape as it relates to revenues. I hope we do not see a backlash yet from the economic downturn. It would greatly help if the budget was more transparent and easier for residents to understand. While I understand why it is needed, the continual movement of funds between accounts is puzzling. Nevertheless, I have a few observations. The est. revenues is 37,728,045. But one should be able to easily find the est. expenditures. To compare. The estimated revenue increase of 4.9% is $1,773,914. This is over the 2020-21 Budget, but is still 3.5% below 2019-20 actual revenue and 10% below 2018-19 actual revenue. This does not follow. It would help if this was explained further? And the TOT is lower than 2019-20 by 29% and lower than 2018-19 by 44%., yet states that it is 27.5% higher than budget. Details would be helpful on this as well. I have provided Ms Copeland with more details on some issues, so she is better to address this at the meeting. View and Analyze eComments This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com. Unsubscribe from future mailings General Fund Revenue & Expenditure Summary $1,773,786 (237,769) 287,399 (a) $1,823,416 (b) $% $20,284,810 $60,756 0.3% 2,750,820 0 0.0% Utility User's Tax 2,065,046 (82,011)(3.8%) 1,836,531 396,071 27.5% $26,937,207 $374,816 1.4% $2,032,316 $349,781 20.8% 902,093 (3,788)(0.4%) 1,978,497 945,267 91.5% 635,452 (250,986)(28.3%) 126,895 (16,615)(11.6%) 5,022,541 348,540 7.5% 93,044 26,899 40.7% $10,790,838 $1,399,098 14.9% $37,728,045 $1,773,914 4.9% $3,396,606 ($128)0.0% $41,124,651 $1,773,786 4.5% General Fund Expenditures $ % Personal Services $21,978,209 $0 0.0% Contract Services 11,564,948 240,769 2.1% Capital Improvement Projects 322,395 0 0.0% Material/Supplies/Other 5,836,281 (3,000)(0.1%) Equipment/Furniture 59,741 0 0.0% Building/Improvements 0 0 N/A Total Expenditures $39,761,574 $237,769 0.6% Transfers Out $1,776,701 $0 0.0% Total Expenditures and Transfers Out $41,538,275 $237,769 0.6% (a) Includes changes to General Plan Maintenance Fees, Frontier PEG Funds, and Contingency. (b) Recommendations will be made regarding the 2019-20 unspent funds and any unappropriated funds from 2020-21 in conjunction with the 2021-22 Budget. (c) The Adjusted Budget includes Council approved changes to revenue and expenditures since budget adoption as well as reappropriations carried forward from the prior year. Total Revenue $35,954,131 Budget Increase/(Decrease) Total Revenue and Transfers In Transfers In $3,396,734 $1,776,701 $41,300,506 Budget Increase/(Decrease) $39,523,805 $21,978,209 11,324,179 322,395 5,839,281 59,741 0 Subtotal Other Revenue $9,391,740 Use of Money & Property 886,438 Intergovernmental/State 143,510 Current Service Charges 4,674,001 2020-21 Midyear Budget Review General Fund Summary Other Taxes $1,682,535 Licenses and Permits 905,881 Subtotal Major Revenue $26,562,391 Other Revenue by Category Projected Surplus/(Deficit) Sales & Use Tax 2,750,820 Transient Occupancy Tax 1,440,460 2,147,057 General Fund Revenue Major Revenue Property Tax $20,224,054 Adjusted Budget (c) 12/31/2020 Midyear 2021 Budget Total Projected Increase in Revenue Less Total Projected Increase In Expenditures Plus Total Changes in Fund Balance Budget Midyear 202112/31/2020 Adjusted Budget (c) Fines & Forfeitures 1,033,230 $39,350,865 Other Revenue 66,145 2020-21 Midyear Budget Review 1 General Fund Revenue Overview Top Tax Revenue Sources 2020-21 Revised Budget 2020-21 Midyear Revision $ Change % Change Property Tax $20,224,054 $20,284,810 $60,756 0.3% Sales Tax $2,750,820 $2,750,820 $0 0% TOT $1,440,460 $1,836,531 $396,071 27.5% Utility Users Tax (UUT)$2,147,057 $2,065,046 ($82,011)(3.8%) Top Tax Total $26,562,391 $26,937,207 $374,816 1.4% 2 3 General Fund Revenue Overview Secured Property Tax $ 15,939,215 $15,992,604 15,000,000.00 15,500,000.00 16,000,000.00 Secured Property Tax 2020-21 Revised Budget 2020-21 Midyear Revision 4 General Fund Revenue Overview Sales Tax $ 2,750,820 $2,750,820 2,600,000.00 2,700,000.00 2,800,000.00 Sales Tax 2020-21 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Revision 5 General Fund Revenue Overview Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) $ 1,440,460 $1,836,531 1,200,000.00 1,400,000.00 1,600,000.00 1,800,000.00 2,000,000.00 TOT 2020-21 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Revision 6 General Fund Revenue Overview Utility User Tax (UUT) $ 2,147,057 $2,065,046 1,800,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,200,000.00 2,400,000.00 2,600,000.00 2,800,000.00 UUT 2020-21 Revised Budget 2021 Midyear Revision General Fund Revenue Overview (Continued) 7 Revenue Sources 2020-21 Revised Budget 2020-21 Midyear Revision $ Change % Change Other Taxes $1,682,535 $2,032,316 $349,071 20.8% Licenses/Permits $905,881 $902,093 ($3,788)(0.4%) Fines/Forfeitures $1,033,320 $1,978,497 $945,267 91.5% Use/Money and Property $886,438 $635,452 ($250,986)(28.3%) Intergovt/State $143,510 $126,895 ($16,615)(11.6%) Service Charges $4,647,001 $5,022,541 $348,540 7.5% Other Revenue $66,145 $93,044 $26,899 40.7% Total General Fund Revenue $35,954,131 $37,728,045 $1,773,914 4.9% Progress Towards Funding Goals 8 Fund balances will be evaluated again with the 2021–22 Budget and a recommendation made for the Insurance Fund and ERF balance at that time. Fund Name Goal Estimated Fund Balance 12/31/2020 Estimated Fund Balance 6/30/2021 After Midyear Change Over/(Under) Goal Amount Compensated Absences Balance $267,950 $0 $267,950 ($53,965) Contingency Balance $88,294 1 $6,300,710 $0 Equipment Replacement Fund $2,170,911 $1,745,888 ($29,132)2 $1,716,756 ($454,155) 1 From General Fund available fund balance. 2 Additional appropriations requested by department, net of revenue revisions. $2,433,099 ($566,901)Insurance Fund Recommended Midyear Change $6,300,710 16% of Operating Budget $321,915 25% of Current Liability $3,000,000 $2,643,797 $6,212,416 ($210,698)2 2020-21 General Fund Estimated Remaining Fund Balance 9 Revenue-2020-21 Revised Budget $35,954,131 Revenue-2020-21 Midyear Revision $37,728,045 Revenue Increase $1,773,914 Additional Appropriation Requests ($237,769) Increase to Contingency (Rainy Day Fund)($88,294) Changes to Fund Balance Reserves $375,565 Estimated Remaining Balance at Midyear $1,823,416 Recommendations will be made regarding the 2019–20 unspent funds of $1,751,688 and any unappropriated funds from 2020–21 in conjunction with the 2021–22 Budget. City Council Questions/Comments 10 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0131 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 AGREEMENT FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT SERVICES (Chief of Police Paul LeBaron) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council discuss and provide direction regarding a proposed amendment to the existing agreement with Willdan Engineering (“Willdan”)for pandemic related code enforcement services.The proposed amendment would provide an additional $50,000 in funding and establish a new agreement termination date of December 31, 2021. Executive Summary: The City Manager/Director of Emergency Services entered into an agreement for services with Willdan on August 4,2020,to provide code enforcement services related to the pandemic.The code enforcement officers provided by Willdan have been instructed to enforce Ordinance No.20-1415U, which established fines for failing to wear a face covering in specified areas of the City.The agreement with Willdan provides for a not to exceed amount $125,000,which is expected to be exhausted on approximately March 28, 2021. Background: Ordinance No.20-1415U was adopted by Council on July 28,2020,and established administrative fines of $100,$200,and $500,for failure to wear face coverings while using the sidewalks of specified areas of Hermosa Avenue,Pier Avenue,Pier Plaza,the Strand,as well as all City parks and beach. Willdan staff was originally assigned to the City four days a week,with one team on weekdays and two teams on weekend days.The first teams were deployed August 8,2020.Between August 8th and November 10th,Willdan staff issued more than 600 citations and distributed approximately 1,500 masks. A total of 88 citations have been contested. During the November 10th Council meeting,City staff provided an oral report and noted an increased level of compliance with the urgency ordinance,particularly as downtown businesses began using more robust reservation systems.The Willdan staff scheduling was subsequently paused.Following concerns raised by the community and the possibility of virus spread during the holidays,Willdan City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0131 staff was scheduled to return to enforcement activities on November 27th. The Willdan staff is currently scheduled during the weekends and is primarily directed to the areas of greatest concern,such as Pier Plaza and the Strand.At this time,one team per weekend day are assigned to the City,and each team contacts approximately 100-175 individuals a day to remind them to wear a mask.Staffing hours have been adjusted as seasonal sunset patterns have changed. While every effort is made to maintain consistent staffing with the same Willdan staff members assigned to the City,there is no guarantee of hours for the Willdan staff,and any unspent funds remain the property of the City when the agreement sunsets. The current agreement with Willdan includes a not to exceed amount of $125,000 and sunsets June 30,2021.The per hour,per staff fee is $65,and staffing one team per day costs the City $1,040,with each weekend costing $2,080.The per hour fee is not the amount paid directly to the Willdan staff, but the amount paid to Willdan for all associated costs,including contract administration,payroll, required state and federal payroll taxes and any mandatory old-age,survivors,and disability insurance program contributions.As of March 9,2021,the contract will have an approximate balance remaining of $8,000. Discussion: The presence of Willdan staff on weekends in high visibility locations does appear to encourage the use of face coverings by the public.While recent surges in hospitalizations and the appearance of COVID-19 variants may have served to convince a larger number of individuals to wear face coverings,the activity reports of the Willdan staff clearly indicate that their presence is valuable in ensuring the public remains vigilant in wearing face coverings.Willdan staff find that most individuals now carry face coverings on their person,but still contact approximately 100 individuals per day to remind them to utilize their face covering appropriately.The majority of face coverings distributed by Willdan staff are now to individuals that have a soiled face covering due to vigorous outdoor activity or beach sand and request a clean face covering. The remaining agreement balance is sufficient to continue staffing one Willdan team each weekend day through approximately March 28,2021.Any extension of the existing agreement will still provide scheduling flexibility and allow the City to engage with Willdan project managers to increase staffing or reduce staffing. Any unspent funds remain the property of the City when the agreement sunsets. The following two alternatives are presented for Council consideration.Staff recommends that Council approve Alternative 2: Alternative 1:Not extend the agreement with Willdan.The last day of service is anticipated to be March 28,2021.There are currently no City staff available to perform the service that Willdan staff provide. Alternative 2:Amend the existing agreement to provide an additional $50,000 in funding (establishing a new not to exceed amount of $175,000)and extend the agreement termination date through December 31,2021.This amendment would provide an additional 48 days of service.Based City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0131 through December 31,2021.This amendment would provide an additional 48 days of service.Based upon the current scheduling calendar,it is anticipated that this alternative would allow the Willdan staff to be scheduled through approximately September 12, 2021. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description July 28, 2020 Authorized the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services to enter into an agreement with a vendor for code enforcement personnel.Adopted Ordinance No. 20-1415U: Established a face covering requirement and associated fines for failure to comply within specified areas of the City. Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact to the City depends on the duration of the agreement.Should Council approve one of the alternatives listed above, the estimated additional cost is as follows: ·Alternative 1: $0 if the existing contract sunsets. ·Alternative 2: $50,000 for an additional 48 days of service. It is important to note that the additional days of service listed above are estimates and may change if more than one team per day is required, or additional days of service are required. The City of Hermosa Beach initially incurs all costs related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, but will submit requests for cost recovery to the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) reimbursement. Attachments: 1.Agreement with Willdan Engineering, effective August 4, 2020. 2.Ordinance No. 20-1415U. 3.Proposed 1st Amendment to Agreement. Respectfully Submitted by:Peter Ahlstrom, Community Services Division Manager Concur:Paul LeBaron, Chief of Police Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 20-1415U AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TEMPORARILY SUSPENDING LOCAL ZONING TO PERMIT SPECIFIED BUSINESSES TO OPERATE OUTDOORS, PERMIT CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS TO OPERATE WITHOUT A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOCATION AND REQUIRE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO WEAR A FACE COVERING DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS, AND SETTING FORTH THE FACTS CONSTITUTING SUCH URGENCY The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. A. On March 15, 2020, City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) Mayor Mary Campbell declared a local emergency to ensure an effective City response to a respiratory disease which has been named “COVID-19.” At a special meeting on March 16, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 20-7230, approving and confirming the declaration of emergency. B. On March 19, 2020, the Governor of the State of California, issued Executive Order N- 33-20, an Order of the State Public Health Officer ordering all individuals living in California to stay home or at their place of residence except as needed to maintain continuity of operations of outlined federal critical infrastructure sectors. C. Evidence in late April and early May demonstrated that state and local orders slowed the increase of community transfer of the disease by limiting interactions amongst people. As a result, on May 7, 2020, Governor Newsom, announced a four-staged framework, titled “Resilience Roadmap” that was intended to guide the state’s gradual modification of its Safer at Home Order to reopen California. The state also issued sector specific guidance to help specified businesses reopen under new restrictions, which require businesses to, among other things, implement social distancing measures. D. In line with the State’s health guidance, the Los Angeles County Public Health Officer issued a revised order on May 13, 2020 entitled “Continuation of Safer at Home Order that begins to move the County of Los Angeles into Stage 2 of the County’s Roadmap to Recovery,” that authorized some limited retail and outdoor recreation venues to reopen subject to among other things, social distancing measures to prevent the further spread of COVID-19. The Order was updated again on May 26th, May 29th, June 11th and June 18th, 2020 to continue to allow the gradual reopening of additional sectors including bars, hair salons, personal care services, gyms and fitness facilities subject to social distancing measures. E. The May 29th Order for example, permitted restaurants and food facilities to remain open and offer limited dine-in seating. The Order also encouraged restaurants to          1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 expand outdoor seating where possible in compliance with local zoning codes to comply with social distancing requirements. F. On June 18, 2020, Governor Newsom along with the State Health Officer released mandatory health guidance that requires Californians, subject to limited exceptions to wear face coverings when outside the home. In line with the mandatory guidance, the Los Angeles County Health Officer issued a revised order on the same date to require all persons to wear a face covering over both the nose and mouth whenever they leave their place of residence and are or can be in contact with or walking near or past others who are non-household members in both public and private places whether indoors or outdoors. According to State and County Health officials, wearing face coverings reduces the risk of transmission to others who do not have symptoms and do not know that they’re infected. G. To assist in the economic recovery of local businesses and restaurants, on May 26, 2020, the City Manager issued Executive No. 2020-05 to temporarily suspend City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050 (B), (C) and 17.44.030 regarding off-street parking requirements for commercial and business uses. Many surrounding cities, including Los Angeles, Pasadena, and Long Beach also implemented similar rules and regulations to assist in the economic recovery of these businesses during the COVID-19 crisis. H. Since that time, the State and County have seen a sharp increase in confirmed COVID- 19 cases and hospitalizations, and the timing of these increases is in line with the reopening of “high risk” businesses where individuals may congregate with members who are not part of the same household and remove their face coverings to eat and drink. As a result, the County Health Officer issued a revised Order on July 1, 2020 to backtrack on the County’s gradual reopening to prohibit indoor dining and order the immediate closure of bars, wineries and winery tasting rooms. I. On July 13, 2020, the State Public Health Officer issued a state-wide order to require the immediate closure of: (1) indoor and outdoor operations of bars, pubs, brewpubs and breweries; and (2) indoor operation of restaurant dining, movie theatres, zoos, museums, cardrooms, wineries and tasting rooms. The order also imposes more stringent requirements on specified counties, including Los Angeles County that have appeared on the State’s Monitoring List for three consecutive days to order the immediate closure of indoor operations of the following sectors: gyms and fitness facilities, places of worship, indoor protests, offices for non-critical infrastructure sectors, personal care establishments, hair salons, barbershops, and malls. J. The following day, on July 14, 2020, the County Health Officer issued a revised Order to coincide with Governor’s July 13th Order and requiring the closure of indoor operations of the following establishments: malls, shopping centers, hair salons, barbershops, fitness facilities, and personal care establishments. K. Under the recent State and County Health Orders, local gyms, fitness centers, hair salons, barbershops, and personal care establishments that are unable to shift their operations outdoors have been forced to shut down for the second time during the          1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COVID-19 pandemic. Many of these businesses were struggling to financially recover following the first mandatory closure in March, and some may not be able to survive a second closure. This Order is intended to assist the economic recovery of these establishments and to permit them to continue to operate outdoors under State and County Health Orders by temporarily suspending local zoning regulations during the COVIID-19 crisis. L. California Business and Professions Code section 7317 requires that all barbershops, hair salons and cosmetology services including specified personal care services, must be performed in a licensed establishment. This Ordinance is further intended to permit the outdoor operation of these establishments as may be permitted by the State Board of Barbering and Cosmetology. M. On July 17, 2020, the City Manager issued Executive Order No. 2020-09 to temporarily suspend specified City of Hermosa Beach zoning regulations to permit gyms and fitness facilities to operate outdoors. The Order also permitted hair salons and barbershops to operate outdoors as permitted by the State Board of Barbering and Cosmetology. N. To assist in the safe outdoor operation of hair salons, barbershops, and personal care establishments, on July 20, 2020, Governor Newsom along with the State Health Officer released mandatory guidance on the safe outdoor operation of these establishments as permitted under its July 13th Order. Consistent with this updated State Guidance, the County Health Officer also updated its reopening protocol for personal care establishments, hair salons and barbershops in Appendices R and H of its order, respectively. O. As a result of State and County Stay-At-Home Orders, all non-essential office work spaces were ordered to close in an effort to slow the spread of COVID-19. City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code section 17.08.020(D)(14) prohibits professional offices in residential zones, that include but are not limited to: the healing arts, law, accounting, real estate, clergy, insurance and similar professional or semi-professional offices, unless the person engaged in such home occupation maintains a principal licensed office in an area permitting such activity as a principal use. Section 17.08.020(D)(14) clearly impedes on these businesses’ ability to continue their home occupations in light of State and County Stay-At-Home-Orders that have forced them to close their commercial office spaces. P. This Ordinance is necessary to supplement the City Manager’s Executive Order No. 2020-09, to (1) temporarily suspend City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050(B), 17.44.030, 17.38.550(B) and 17.08.020(D)(14) regarding uses permitted within commercial zones, off-street parking requirements for commercial and business use, and home occupation permits to the extent they conflict with this Ordinance. Q. This Ordinance also adopts additional measures to require members of the public to wear face coverings whenever they leave their place of residence.          1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 R. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Government Code section 36937, for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety of residents living within the City, and finds urgency to approve this Ordinance immediately based on the facts described herein and detailed in the staff report. SECTION 2. The provisions of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050 (B), 17.44.030, 17.38.550(B) and 17.08.020(D)(14) regarding uses permitted within commercial zones, off-street parking requirements for commercial and business uses within commercial zones, and home occupation permits are hereby temporarily suspended, to the extent they conflict with this Ordinance, to allow for the implementation of items A and B below on a temporary basis during the term of the City, State and Los Angeles County COVID-19 emergency orders: A. Gyms, fitness centers, hair salons, barbershops and personal care establishments (to the extent permitted by the State Board of Barbering and Cosmetology) may operate outdoors to assist in their economic recovery in accordance with the “Outdoor Commercial Uses Operational Standards” attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. B. Consistent with the Los Angeles County Health Officer Reopening Protocol for Personal Care Establishment in Appendix R, “personal care services” shall include: nail salons, tanning salons, esthetician, skin care, cosmetology services and massage therapy (in a non-healthcare setting). Electrology, tattooing, microblading, permanent make-up and piercing may not operate outdoors because they are invasive procedures that require a controlled hygienic environment to be performed safely. Mobile or in- home personal care services are not allowed. C. Professional offices, including but not limited to the healing arts, law, accounting, real estate, clergy, insurance and similar professional or semiprofessional offices may render their services from their residence with a home occupation permit regardless if they comply with Municipal Code section 17.08.020(D)(14), to allow them to continue to operate and pursue their livelihoods while complying with California and Los Angeles County Health orders in response to COVID-19. SECTION 3. The following emergency measures are adopted: A. All persons shall wear a face covering over both the nose and mouth whenever they are present in the following locations within the City: a. The Beach. b. Downtown Hermosa Beach, defined as (i) the area bounded by the southerly edge of the 10th Street right-of-way on the south, the northerly edge of the 14th Street right- of-way on the north, the easterly edge of the Strand on the west and the easterly edge of the Hermosa Avenue right-of-way on the east, and (ii) Upper Pier Avenue (inclusive of sidewalks) from Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive. c. The Greenbelt. d. All City parks. e. Pier Plaza.          1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 f. The Strand. B. All persons shall wear a face covering over both the nose and mouth whenever they leave their place of residence and are or can be in contact with or walking near or past others who are non-household members in both public and private places whether indoors or outdoors, in all locations in the City other than those locations described in and subject to the proscription set forth in paragraph A of this Section 3. C. Paragraphs A and B of this Section 3 shall not apply to: a. Persons younger than two years old; b. Persons who have been instructed by a medical provider not to wear a face covering due to a medical condition, mental health condition, or disability that prevents wearing a face covering; c. Persons who are hearing impaired, or communicating with a person who is hearing impaired, where the ability to see the mouth is essential for communication; d. Persons who are swimming or engaged in other water-based activities; and e. Healthcare workers, first responders, and others whose work requires close contact with people who are ill. D. For purposes of this Ordinance, “face covering” shall mean: fabric coverings, such as cloth masks, scarves, bandanas, tightly woven fabric such as cotton t-shirt, and some types of towels that cover the nose and mouth. Medical-grade masks and N-95 respirators are not required. E. Persons who are seated at a restaurant or other establishment that offers food or beverage service shall wear a cloth face covering over both the nose and mouth unless they are eating or drinking. F. With respect to persons on the beach, this Ordinance supersedes Section 2(c)(ii) of City Manager Executive Order No. 2020-06. G. The provisions of this Section 3 shall be enforced by way of issuance of administrative citations pursuant to HBMC Chapter 1.10. SECTION 4. In addition to enforcement remedies available to the City as provided in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, emergency executive orders issued by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services and confirmed by City Council, and emergency ordinances, orders and resolutions adopted by the City Council shall be enforceable by way of: A. Imposing an administrative citation pursuant to HBMC Chapter 1.10. B. Prosecuting a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not to exceed one thousand ($1,000) dollars or by imprisonment for not to exceed six months, or both.          1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance is found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 6. Environmental Review. The City Council finds that adoption and implementation of this ordinance is not a “project” for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as that term is defined by CEQA guidelines (Guidelines) sections 15061(b)(3), and 15378(b)(5). The effect of the proposed amendment will be to maintain the status quo. No new development will result from the proposed action. No impact to the physical environment will result. The City Council also alternatively finds that the adoption and implementation of this ordinance is exempt from the provisions of CEQA as an administrative activity by the City of Hermosa Beach, in furtherance of its police power, that will not result in any direct or indirect physical change in the environment, per sections 15061(b)(3), and 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA , Guidelines, as well as CEQA Guidelines section 15064(e) (economic regulations). SECTION 7. Urgency Declaration; Effective Date. The City Council finds and declares that the adoption and implementation of this Ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation and protection of the public peace, health and safety as detailed above by the City, pursuant to Government Code section 36937. As a result of State and County stay at home orders, local gyms, fitness facilities, hair salons and barbershops were forced to close. The rapid, immediate and unexpected loss of revenue following the first wave of mandatory closures was devastating to these local businesses. Many of these businesses are still struggling to financially recover, and some may not be able to survive a second closure. Additionally, home occupations that render certain professional services, are unable to pursue their livelihoods while complying with local zoning regulations and State and County health orders. The recent increase in confirmed cases and hospitalizations demonstrates how easily and rapidly the disease can spread form person-to person. By requiring members of the public to wear face coverings while outside of their places of residence helps reduce the risk of community transfer of the disease. This Ordinance is intended to assist the economic recovery of these establishments and to permit them to continue to operate under State and County health orders by temporarily suspending specified local zoning regulations during the COVIID-19 crisis. This Ordinance is also conducive to the public health because it requires businesses to follow the directives of State and County public health officials to prevent the further spread of the disease. This Ordinance must be passed by four-fifths of the City Council and shall take effect immediately after passage. SECTION 8. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be published or posted in the manner required by law.          1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 2020 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell NOES: Councilmember Fangary PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________ ___ Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Michael Jenkins, City Attorney          Executive Order No. 2020-09, Exhibit A šŠ‹„‹–      Ǥ    Ǥ Š‡—–†‘‘”‘‡”…‹ƒŽ•‡•‡•‹‰ƒ†’‡”ƒ–‹‘ƒŽ–ƒ†ƒ”†•ƒ”‡ ƒ†‘’–‡†’—”•—ƒ––‘š‡…—–‹˜‡”†‡”ʹͲʹͲǦͲͻ‹‘”†‡”–‘‡•–ƒ„Ž‹•Š •’‡…‹ˆ‹…†‡•‹‰ƒ†‘’‡”ƒ–‹‘ƒŽ…”‹–‡”‹ƒˆ‘”–‡’‘”ƒ”›‘—–†‘‘” …‘‡”…‹ƒŽ—•‡•‹’—„Ž‹…ƒ†’”‹˜ƒ–‡ƒ”‡ƒ•Ǥ  Ǥ ‘—–†‘‘”…‘‡”…‹ƒŽƒ”‡ƒ‹•ƒ’Žƒ…‡‘’”‹˜ƒ–‡’”‘’‡”–›ǡ’”‹˜ƒ–‡ ’ƒ”‹‰•–ƒŽŽ•’—„Ž‹…’ƒ”‹‰•–ƒŽŽ•ǡ’—„Ž‹…‡–‡”‡†’ƒ”‹‰•’ƒ…‡• ™Š‡”‡’ƒ–”‘•ƒ›…‘†—…–…‘‡”…‹ƒŽƒ…–‹˜‹–‹‡••—…Šƒ•„—–‘– Ž‹‹–‡†–‘‰›Ȁˆ‹–‡••ƒ†’‡”•‘ƒŽ•‡”˜‹…‡„›ƒƒ†Œƒ…‡– …‘‡”…‹ƒŽ„—•‹‡••Ǥ  Ǥ Š‡•‡•–ƒ†ƒ”†•ƒ†’”‘…‡†—”‡•”‡‰—Žƒ–‡–Š‡†‡•‹‰ƒ†‘’‡”ƒ–‹‘‘ˆ –‡’‘”ƒ”›‘—–†‘‘”…‘‡”…‹ƒŽƒ”‡ƒ•Ǥ ‘™‡˜‡”ǡ–Š‡›†‘‘–’”‘˜‹†‡ ‹ˆ‘”ƒ–‹‘‘ƒŽŽ–Š‡‰‘˜‡”‡–ƒ‰‡…›”‡“—‹”‡‡–•ˆ‘”•–ƒ”–‹‰ƒ ‡™„—•‹‡••‘”‡š’ƒ†‹‰ƒ‡š‹•–‹‰‘‡Ǥ—•‹‡••‘™‡”•—•– •‡…—”‡–Š‡ƒ’’”‘’”‹ƒ–‡Ž‹…‡•‡•ƒ†’‡”‹–•‘•‰‡Ž‡•‘—–› ‡ƒŽ–Š‡’ƒ”–‡–ǡ–Š‡‹–›‘ˆ ‡”‘•ƒ‡ƒ…Š‘—‹–› ‡˜‡Ž‘’‡–‡’ƒ”–‡–ƒ†—•‹‡••‹…‡•‡ˆˆ‹…‡Ǥ  Ǥ ‡’‘”ƒ”›‘—–†‘‘”…‘‡”…‹ƒŽƒ”‡ƒ••ŠƒŽŽ„‡’‡”‹––‡†–‘‘’‡”ƒ–‡ ˆ‘”–Š‡†—”ƒ–‹‘‘ˆ–Š‡–ƒ–‡‘ˆƒŽ‹ˆ‘”‹ƒǯ•‡”‰‡…›”†‡”•ˆ‘”  ǦͳͻǤ‡”‹••‹‘ˆ‘”–‡’‘”ƒ”›‘—–†‘‘”…‘‡”…‹ƒŽƒ”‡ƒ•™‹ŽŽ ‡š’‹”‡‹‡†‹ƒ–‡Ž›—’‘‘—–›ƒ†–ƒ–‡ƒ’’”‘˜ƒŽ–‘”‡‘’‡ƒ– …ƒ’ƒ…‹–›Ž‡˜‡Ž•‡•–ƒ„Ž‹•Š‡†’”‹‘”–‘–Š‡ Ǧͳͻ’ƒ†‡‹…Ž‹‹–•Ǥ  Ǥ Š‡•‡”‡‰—Žƒ–‹‘•ƒ’’Ž›–‘‘—–†‘‘”…‘‡”…‹ƒŽƒ”‡ƒ•‘’”‹˜ƒ–‡ ’”‘’‡”–›ƒ†–Š‡’—„Ž‹…”‹‰Š–Ǧ‘ˆǦ™ƒ›Ǥ  Ǥ     Ǥ ‡’‘”ƒ”›‘‡”…‹ƒŽƒ”‡ƒ•–Šƒ–ƒ„‹†‡„›–Š‡•–ƒ†ƒ”†•ƒ† ’”‘…‡†—”‡•‹–Š‹•‡šŠ‹„‹–•ŠƒŽŽ‘’‡”ƒ–‡„›”‹‰Š–†—”‹‰–Š‡†—”ƒ–‹‘‘ˆ –Š‡–ƒ–‡‘ˆƒŽ‹ˆ‘”‹ƒǯ•‡”‰‡…›”†‡”•ˆ‘” ǦͳͻǤ  Ǥ ƒ’’Ž‹…ƒ–‹‘ˆ‘”–Š‡–‡’‘”ƒ”›…‘‡”…‹ƒŽƒ”‡ƒ•ŠƒŽŽ„‡’”‘˜‹†‡† –‘–Š‡‘—‹–›‡˜‡Ž‘’‡–‡’ƒ”–‡–’”‹‘”–‘‘’‡”ƒ–‹‘Ǥ  Ǥ ‡…”‘ƒ…Š‡–’‡”‹–•ŠƒŽŽ„‡”‡“—‹”‡†ˆ‘”‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒ•‹–Š‡ ’—„Ž‹…”‹‰Š–Ǧ‘ˆǦ™ƒ›Ǥ”‘‘ˆ‘ˆ‡”–‹ˆ‹…ƒ–‡‘ˆŽ‹ƒ„‹Ž‹–›‹•—”ƒ…‡•ŠƒŽŽ„‡ Executive Order No. 2020-09, Exhibit A ’”‘˜‹†‡†–‘–Š‡—„Ž‹…‘”•‡’ƒ”–‡–ǡ™‹–Š–Š‡‹–›‘ˆ ‡”‘•ƒ ‡ƒ…Šƒ‡†ƒ•††‹–‹‘ƒŽŽ› •—”‡†ǡ’”‹‘”–‘‹••—ƒ…‡‘ˆƒ ‡…”‘ƒ…Š‡–’‡”‹–Ǥ  Ǥ    Ǥ Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒ•ŠƒŽŽ„‡’‡”‹––‡†‘’”‹˜ƒ–‡’”‘’‡”–›ǡ’—„Ž‹…•–”‡‡– ’ƒ”‹‰‘”Ž‘–•ƒ†Œƒ…‡––‘–Š‡„—•‹‡••Ǥ ˆ–Š‡„—•‹‡••Šƒ•‘Ǧ•‹–‡ ’ƒ”‹‰ǡƒ’‘”–‹‘‘ˆ–Š‡’”‹˜ƒ–‡’ƒ”‹‰ƒ›„‡—•‡†ˆ‘”–Š‡‘—–†‘‘” ƒ”‡ƒǤ  Ǥ Š‡ƒš‹—ƒ”‡ƒ‘ˆ‡‹–Š‡”’”‹˜ƒ–‡‘”’—„Ž‹…ƒ”‡ƒ•ƒ›‘–‡š…‡‡† –Š‡Ž‘••‘ˆ…ƒ’ƒ…‹–›‘ˆ–Š‡‹–‡”‹‘”ƒ”‡ƒ‘ˆ–Š‡„—•‹‡••Ǥ  Ǥ Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒ•ŠƒŽŽ„‡ƒ……‡••‹„Ž‡–‘–Š‡†‹•ƒ„Ž‡†ǤŠ‡„—‹Ž†‹‰• ƒ†Œƒ…‡––‘–Š‡•‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒ••ŠƒŽŽƒ‹–ƒ‹„—‹Ž†‹‰‡‰”‡••ƒ• †‡ˆ‹‡†„›–Š‡‹ˆ‘”—‹Ž†‹‰‘†‡ƒ†‹–Ž‡ʹͶ‹•ƒ„Ž‡†……‡•• –ƒ†ƒ”†•Ǥ  Ǥ Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒ•ŠƒŽŽ‘–„‡Ž‘…ƒ–‡†™‹–Š‹–™‡–›ˆ‡‡–‘ˆƒ ‘—–†‘‘”ˆ‘‘†‡•–ƒ„Ž‹•Š‡–Ǥ  Ǥ    Ǥ ƒ””‹‡”••ŠƒŽŽ…‘ˆ‘”–‘–Š‡—„Ž‹…‘”•‹”‡…–‘”̵•‹•–ƒŽŽƒ–‹‘ •–ƒ†ƒ”†•ƒ†„‡”‡‘˜ƒ„Ž‡Ǥƒ””‹‡”•‡‡†‘–„‡”‡‘˜‡†‡ƒ…Š ‡˜‡‹‰ǡ„—–•ŠƒŽŽ„‡…ƒ’ƒ„Ž‡‘ˆ„‡‹‰”‡‘˜‡†Ǣ‹ˆ‹„‡††‡†‹–‘–Š‡ ’ƒ˜‡‡––Š‡›—•–„‡ˆ‹š‡†–Š”‘—‰Š–Š‡—•‡‘ˆ”‡…‡••‡†•Ž‡‡˜‡•ƒ† ’‘•–•ǡ‘–Š‡”™‹•‡„›™Š‡‡Ž•–Šƒ–…ƒ„‡Ž‘…‡†‹–‘’Žƒ…‡‘”™‡‹‰Š–‡† ‹’Žƒ…‡Ǥ‘•‹‰•‘”„ƒ‡”•‘ˆƒ›‹†•ŠƒŽŽ„‡’Žƒ…‡†ǡ†‹•’Žƒ›‡†‘” ‡”‡…–‡†‘„ƒ””‹‡”•  Ǥ Š‡ƒ’’‡ƒ”ƒ…‡•Š‘—Ž†„‡ƒ†‡ƒ––”ƒ…–‹˜‡™‹–Š’‘––‡†’Žƒ–•‘”‘–Š‡” †‡…‘”ƒ–‹˜‡‡Ž‡‡–•–‘’”‘˜‹†‡ƒ‡Šƒ…‡†ƒ†‹˜‹–‹‰‘—–†‘‘” ‡˜‹”‘‡–Ǥ  Ǥ ‘ƒ††‹–‹‘ƒŽ’ƒ”‹‰•ŠƒŽŽ„‡”‡“—‹”‡†ˆ‘”–Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒǤ‘–Š‡ ‡š–‡–ˆ‡ƒ•‹„Ž‡ǡ‹ˆ‡š‹•–‹‰’ƒ”‹‰‹•ƒ˜ƒ‹Žƒ„Ž‡ǡ’ƒ”‹‰•’ƒ…‡••Š‘—Ž† …‘–‹—‡–‘„‡ƒ˜ƒ‹Žƒ„Ž‡–‘…—•–‘‡”•Ǥ  Ǥ     Ǥ ƒƒ‰‡‡–‘ˆ–Š‡…‘‡”…‹ƒŽ‡•–ƒ„Ž‹•Š‡–‹•”‡•’‘•‹„Ž‡ˆ‘” ”—‹‰ƒ†‘’‡”ƒ–‹‰–Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒƒ†•ŠƒŽŽ‘–†‡Ž‡‰ƒ–‡‘” ƒ••‹‰–Šƒ–”‡•’‘•‹„‹Ž‹–›Ǥ—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒ••ŠƒŽŽ„‡…‘–‹—‘—•Ž› Executive Order No. 2020-09, Exhibit A •—’‡”˜‹•‡†„›ƒƒ‰‡‡––‘‡•—”‡•‘…‹ƒŽ†‹•–ƒ…‹‰‰—‹†‡Ž‹‡•ƒ”‡ „‡‹‰‡–Ǥ  Ǥ ƒƒ‰‡‡–•ŠƒŽŽ‡‡’–Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒ…Ž‡ƒ”‘ˆŽ‹––‡”ƒ†ˆ‘‘† •…”ƒ’•Ǥ Ǥ ƒƒ‰‡‡–•ŠƒŽŽ„‡”‡•’‘•‹„Ž‡ˆ‘”ƒ‹–ƒ‹‹‰‘‹•‡˜‘Ž—‡•ƒ– ”‡ƒ•‘ƒ„Ž‡Ž‡˜‡Ž•Ǥ  Ǥ ––Š‡‡†‘ˆ‡ƒ…Š„—•‹‡••†ƒ›ǡ‡•–ƒ„Ž‹•Š‡–•ƒ”‡”‡“—‹”‡†–‘…Ž‡ƒ ȋ•™‡‡’ƒ†™ƒ•ŠȌ–Š‡ƒ”‡ƒ‹ƒ†ƒ”‘—†–Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒƒ† ”‡‘˜‡–Š‡†‡„”‹•–‘ƒ…Ž‘•‡†”‡…‡’–ƒ…Ž‡Ǥ‘†‡„”‹••ŠƒŽŽ„‡•™‡’–ǡ ™ƒ•Š‡†ǡ‘”„Ž‘™‹–‘–Š‡•‹†‡™ƒŽǡ‰—––‡”‘”•–”‡‡–‹…‘ˆ‘”ƒ…‡ ™‹–Š–Š‡‹–›̵•”‡‰—Žƒ–‹‘•Ǥ  Ǥ ’‘–‡”‹ƒ–‹‘‘ˆ–Š‡‘—–†‘‘”…‘‡”…‹ƒŽ—•‡ǡ–Š‡„—•‹‡••‘™‡” •ŠƒŽŽ‹‡†‹ƒ–‡Ž›”‡‘˜‡–Š‡„ƒ””‹‡”•ƒ”‘—†–Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒǡ ”‡–—”–Š‡•‹†‡™ƒŽ–‘‹–•‘”‹‰‹ƒŽ…‘†‹–‹‘ǡƒ†”‡‘˜‡ƒŽŽ’‡”•‘ƒŽ ’”‘’‡”–›ǡˆ—”‹•Š‹‰•ǡƒ†‡“—‹’‡–ˆ”‘–Š‡•‹†‡™ƒŽǤ›’‡”•‘ƒŽ ’”‘’‡”–›”‡ƒ‹‹‰‘–Š‡’”‡‹•‡••ŠƒŽŽ„‡”‡‘˜‡†’—”•—ƒ––‘–Š‡ Žƒ™•‘ˆ–Š‡–ƒ–‡‘ˆƒŽ‹ˆ‘”‹ƒǤ  Ǥ Š‡ƒŽŽ‘™ƒ„Ž‡Š‘—”•‘ˆ‘’‡”ƒ–‹‘•ŠƒŽŽ„‡Ž‹‹–‡†–‘ͺǣͲͲƒǤǤ–‘͸ ’ǤǤ͹†ƒ›•ƒ™‡‡Ǥ  Ǥ ’Ž‹ˆ‹‡†‡–‡”–ƒ‹‡–•ŠƒŽŽ„‡•–”‹…–Ž›’”‘Š‹„‹–‡†‹‘—–†‘‘” …‘‡”…‹ƒŽƒ”‡ƒ•Ǥ–‘–‹‡ƒ›‘‹•‡Ž‡˜‡Ž•‘ˆƒ…–‹˜‹–‹‡•…‘†—…–‡† ‹–Š‡†‡•‹‰ƒ–‡†‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒ•…‘•–‹–—–‡ƒ—‹•ƒ…‡‘”˜‹‘Žƒ–‡–Š‡ ‘‹•‡‘–”‘Ž”†‹ƒ…‡‹Šƒ’–‡”ͺǤʹͶǤ  Ǥ —–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒ•ˆ‘”ˆ‹–‡••—•‡•ƒ”‡Ž‹‹–‡†–‘Šƒ†ǦŠ‡Ž†ˆ‹–‡•• ‡“—‹’‡–Ǥƒ”‰‡ˆ‹–‡••‡“—‹’‡–•—…Šƒ•„—–Ž‹‹–‡†–‘•“—ƒ–”ƒ…• ƒ†ˆ‹–‡••–‹”‡•ƒ”‡’”‘Š‹„‹–‡†Ǥ‡‹‰Š–†”‘’’‹‰•ŠƒŽŽ„‡•–”‹…–Ž› ’”‘Š‹„‹–‡†Ǥ  Ǥ Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒ•ŠƒŽŽ‘–ƒ†˜‡”•‡Ž›ƒˆˆ‡…––Š‡™‡Žˆƒ”‡‘ˆ–Š‡ ”‡•‹†‡–•ǡƒ†Ȁ‘”…‘‡”…‹ƒŽ‡•–ƒ„Ž‹•Š‡–•‡ƒ”„›Ǥ   Ǥ    Ǥ ‘–‹…‡‘ˆ˜‹‘Žƒ–‹‘‘ˆ–Š‡‘—–†‘‘”…‘‡”…‹ƒŽ—•‡†‡•‹‰•–ƒ†ƒ”†•‘” •–ƒ†ƒ”†•‘ˆ‘’‡”ƒ–‹‘•ŠƒŽŽ„‡ƒ†‡‹™”‹–‹‰–‘–Š‡„—•‹‡••‘™‡” „›ƒ›‘†‡ˆ‘”…‡‡–ˆˆ‹…‡”ǡ—„Ž‹…‘”• •’‡…–‘”ǡ—‹Ž†‹‰ •’‡…–‘”ǡ‘Ž‹…‡‡’ƒ”–‡–ˆˆ‹…‹ƒŽǡ‘” ‹”‡‡’ƒ”–‡–ˆˆ‹…‹ƒŽ‘ˆ –Š‡‹–›Ǥ…‘’›‘ˆ–Š‡‘–‹…‡•ŠƒŽŽ„‡ˆ‹Ž‡†™‹–Š–Š‡—„Ž‹…‘”• ‹”‡…–‘”ǤŠ‡„—•‹‡••‘™‡”•ŠƒŽŽ‹‡†‹ƒ–‡Ž›…—”‡–Š‡˜‹‘Žƒ–‹‘ Executive Order No. 2020-09, Exhibit A —’‘”‡…‡‹’–‘ˆ‘–‹…‡Ǥ ˆ–Š‡˜‹‘Žƒ–‹‘‹•‘–…—”‡†™‹–Š‹–‡ȋͳͲȌ †ƒ›•ƒˆ–‡”‹••—ƒ…‡‘ˆ–Š‡‘–‹…‡–‘–Š‡„—•‹‡••‘™‡”ǡ–Š‡‹”‡…–‘” ƒ›•—•’‡†‘””‡˜‘‡–Š‡…”‘ƒ…Š‡–‡”‹–Ǥ  Ǥ –Š‡…ƒ•‡‘ˆ‘Ǧ…‘’Ž‹ƒ…‡™‹–Š…‘†‹–‹‘•‘ˆƒ’’”‘˜ƒŽǡ•—„•–ƒ–‹ƒŽ †‹ˆˆ‹…—Ž–‹‡•”‡•—Ž–‹‰ˆ”‘–Š‡‘’‡”ƒ–‹‘‘ˆ–Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒǡ‘”‘–Š‡” —ˆ‘”‡•‡‡’”‘„Ž‡•™‹–Š–Š‡‘’‡”ƒ–‹‘‘ˆ–Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒǡ–Š‡ ‘—‹–›‡˜‡Ž‘’‡–‹”‡…–‘”Šƒ•–Š‡”‹‰Š––‘”‡‡˜ƒŽ—ƒ–‡–Š‡ „—•‹‡••‘™‡”•„›Ǧ”‹‰Š–‘’‡”ƒ–‹‘‘ˆ–Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒǢƒ†ǡ‹ˆ–Š‡ ‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒŠƒ•…”‡ƒ–‡†‡‹‰Š„‘”Š‘‘†ǡ‘Ž‹…‡‘”‘†‡ˆ‘”…‡‡– ’”‘„Ž‡•ǡ…‘–‹—‡†‘’‡”ƒ–‹‘•‘ˆ–Š‡‘—–†‘‘”ƒ”‡ƒƒ›„‡ ’”‘Š‹„‹–‡†Ǥ FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND WILLDAN ENGINEERING This First Amendment to the Agreement Between the City of Hermosa Beach and Willdan Engineering for code enforcement services is entered into by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and WILLDAN ENGINEERING., a California corporation (“CONTRACTOR”), as of ________________, 2021. RECITALS A. CITY and CONTRACTOR are parties to an Agreement for code enforcement services dated August 4, 2020. B. CITY and CONTRACTOR now desire to amend the Agreement for a first time to engage and compensate the CONTRACTOR for an additional term and establish a not to exceed amount of_________________________. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Agreement is amended a first time as follows: 1. Section 2 of the Agreement entitled “TERM OF AGREEMENT” is amended to read as follows: TERM OF THE AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on _____________________, unless earlier termination occurs under Section 9 of this Agreement or this Agreement is extended in writing in advance by both parties. 2. Section 3 of the Agreement entitled “COMPENSATION” is amended to read as follows: COMPENSATION. The CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR for services rendered pursuant to the Agreement the sum of $65.00 per hour, per officer; not to exceed the sum of $_______________ through ____________________, absent a written amendment to this AGREEMENT. The rate is comprehensive and includes project management and any additional costs incurred by CONTRACTOR in performance of this contract (e.g., mileage, uniforms and officer equipment, or supplies). CONTRACTOR shall not be entitled to reimbursement for any expenses. Any expenses incurred by CONTRACTOR that are not expressly authorized by this AGREEMENT will not be reimbursed by CITY. Except as above modified, in all other respects the Agreement is hereby reaffirmed in full force and effect. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WILLDAN ENGINEERING By__________________________ By Suja Lowenthal, CITY MANAGER TITLE APPROVED AS TO FORM ATTEST By___________________________ By Michael Jenkins, CITY ATTORNEY Eduardo Sarmiento, CITY CLERK City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 21-0157 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 A LETTER REGARDING LAX AIRFIELD AND TERMINAL MODERNIZATION PROJECT AND DRAFT EIR (Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council approve a letter detailing the City’s response to the LAX Airfield and Terminal Modernization Project draft EIR and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Executive Summary: Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA)is moving forward with a modernization and expansion plan for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).In response to these plans,Council directed staff to craft a letter detailing its response to the draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Background: LAWA has unveiled plans and a draft EIR for modernization and expansion at LAX including,but not limited to a new terminal east of Sepulveda Boulevard,a new concourse,and a number of airfield improvements.Staff has been in discussion with neighboring agencies about the issue and seeks Council’s final direction on a possible response. Comments on the draft EIR are due March 15, 2021. Discussion: The proposed modernization and expansion plan for LAX is a $6 billion project that will add over 2 million square feet of new buildings and a number of changes to the airfield. It will also add a people mover and the first terminal east of Sepulveda Boulevard. The City of El Segundo is drafting a detailed letter expressing their concerns with the impacts of the project on the area and the perceived inadequacy of the project’s mitigation plans. El Segundo contends there are flaws with LAWA’s argument that this project is simply an “accommodation” of inevitable growth as opposed to “inducing” more growth. El Segundo response to the draft EIR will address these concerns as well as their contention that additional traffic mitigations should be made. Staff has been in contact with staff from other local agencies about their own concerns and potential responses. This includes communications with the cities of El Segundo and Manhattan Beach as well City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0157 as the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. At its February 23, 2021 meeting, Council heard a presentation from LAWA about the scope of the project and its draft EIR. At this same meeting, staff brought forth an item seeking direction from Council on a possible response letter. Council discussed this item and directed staff to speak with the City of El Segundo about cooperating with their ongoing efforts to draft a response and bring back a draft letter for Council review at this March 9 meeting. Attached is a draft letter that captures many of the concerns Council raised as well as those of many of our neighboring agencies. It has been reviewed by the City Attorney to ensure the City has the option to challenge the adequacy of the Final EIR on the issues raised in the letter, if the City is not satisfied that they have been addressed in the Final EIR. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description February 9, 2021 Directed staff to bring back an item to discuss potential response to LAX Expansion Project Draft EIR February 23, 2021 Directed staff to bring back a draft letter regarding the project EIR for discussion and approval General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendations have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: Governance Goal 4. A leader and partner in the region. Policies: ·4.3 Collaboration with adjacent jurisdictions.Maintain strong collaborative relationships with adjacent jurisdictions and work together on projects of mutual interest and concern Fiscal Impact: The cost of the City Attorney review,not to exceed $1,000,will be paid from the City Attorney’s budget. Attachments: 1.Draft Letter (to be provided as a supplemental attachment prior to the Council meeting) City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 21-0157 Respectfully Submitted by: Doug Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 21-0162 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2021 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information. Attachments: Tentative Future Agenda Items City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/5/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ March 3, 2021 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 9, 2021 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS MARCH 23, 2021 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION MARCH 23, 2021 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT CITY MANAGER REPORTS COVID-19 Update Update from Chief LeBaron on COVID-19 Emergency Enforcement Measures Update from Jim Fasola – City Delegate to the Los Angeles County West Vector & Vector-Borne Disease Control District Board of Trustees CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS Updates from City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees and Standing Committee Delegates/Alternates CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Finance Director Ongoing Revenue Report, Expenditure Report and CIP Report by Project Finance Director Ongoing City Treasurer’s Report and Cash Balance Report City Treasurer Ongoing Cancellation of Certain Checks City Treasurer Ongoing Public Works Project Status Report Public Works Director Ongoing Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of January 20, 2021 Public Works Director Ongoing Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of March 16, 2021 Community Development Director Ongoing Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Items Community Development Director Ongoing 2020 Annual Housing Element Progress Report Community Development Director Staff Request Feb. 25, 2021 Second Reading - Floodplain Management Ordinance Update Public Works Director Council Direction Mar. 9, 2021 Replacement of three existing electric vehicle chargers Environmental Programs Manager Staff Request Feb. 17, 2021 MUNICIPAL MATTERS Approval Agreement with Leadership Hermosa Beach for its Class of 2021 Project Including Renovations to the Eastern BBQ Area at Valley Park Interim Community Resources Manager Staff Request Feb. 11, 2021 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Tentative Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing 2 APRIL 13, 2021 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION APRIL 13, 2021 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 2021 AS DONATE LIFE MONTH IN HERMOSA BEACH PRESENTATION FROM CALRECYCLE ON SB1383 - MANDATORY ORGANICS RECYCLING REGULATION CITY MANAGER REPORTS COVID-19 Update Update from Chief LeBaron on COVID-19 Emergency Enforcement Measures CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS Updates from City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees and Standing Committee Delegates/Alternates CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Finance Director Ongoing Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) Finance Director Annual Los Angeles Fire Services and McCormick Ambulance Monthly Report for February 2021 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing Approval of Resolution authorizing the preparation of a report for the annual Levy of Assessments within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District during Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Public Works Director Annual PUBLIC HEARINGS – 6:30 PM Mandatory Organics Recycling Ordinance Environmental Programs Manager Staff Request Jan 11, 2021 MUNICIPAL MATTERS Board/Commission Vacancies – Upcoming expiration of three terms on the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission City Clerk 4-Year Terms FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing 3 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 21, 2021 @ 6:00 PM FISCAL YEAR 2021–22 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY SESSION APRIL 27, 2021 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION: LITIGATION QUARTERLY UPDATE APRIL 27, 2021 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT CITY MANAGER REPORTS COVID-19 Update Update from Chief LeBaron on COVID-19 Emergency Enforcement Measures CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS Updates from City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees and Standing Committee Delegates/Alternates CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Finance Director Ongoing Revenue Report, Expenditure Report and CIP Report by Project Finance Director Ongoing City Treasurer’s Report and Cash Balance Report City Treasurer Ongoing Cancellation of Certain Checks City Treasurer Ongoing Public Works Project Status Report Public Works Director Ongoing Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of April 20, 2021 Community Development Director Ongoing Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Items Community Development Director Ongoing Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of March 2, 2021 Interim Community Resources Manager Ongoing MUNICIPAL MATTERS Police Department Policy Review- Privacy of Recorded Images Police Chief Council Direction Feb. 9, 2021 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Tentative Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing 4 TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2021 SPECIAL ELECTION FOR CITY COUNCIL SEAT THURSDAY, MAY 13, 2021 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION THURSDAY, MAY 13, 2021 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT RECOGNIZING NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK MAY 16–22, 2021 CITY MANAGER REPORTS COVID-19 Update Update from Chief LeBaron on COVID-19 Emergency Enforcement Measures CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS Updates from City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees and Standing Committee Delegates/Alternates CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Finance Director Ongoing Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of April 12, 2021 Community Resources Manager Ongoing Los Angeles Fire Services and McCormick Ambulance Monthly Report for March 2021 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing PUBLIC HEARINGS – 6:30 PM Public Hearing on the Annual Levy for the Sewer Charge and Engineer’s Report Public Works Director Annual FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing 5 PENDING STRATEGIC PLAN ITEMS STATUS / TENTATIVE MEETING DATE Update Personnel Policies Human Resources Manager Beach Policy/Regulations (Continued from meeting of October 27, 2016) Community Resources Manager On hold by Council Alternative Fuel Transportation Report, Nov. 2016 Environmental Analyst CCA Direction, Dec. 2016 Environmental Programs Manager PENDING NEW ITEMS STATUS / TENTATIVE MEETING DATE Consideration of re-establishing, on an as needed basis, both funding and discretion for the director of Public Works to contract services to pump major beach storm outfalls drains prior to anticipated major storm events (supported by Duclos, Armato and Petty) Initiated by: Other Matters Feb. 14, 2017 Public Works Director Staff to provide an update on storm drain maintenance and provide details on hydrodynamic separators (CIP 435) at the following CIP study session Policy discussion regarding city responsibilities and expectations when donations are made to city Initiated by: Council Direction May 24, 2017 Finance Director Will be discussed at the Revenue Strategy Study Session Approval of the Municipal Lease Policy Initiated by: Staff Request Jun. 12, 2018 Community Resources Manager Document Retention Policy Initiated by: Staff Request Nov. 28, 2018 City Clerk Pending Deputy City Clerk Appointment Consent for use of “Lot B” for construction staging area for Pier/Strand project Initiated by: Staff Request Dec. 17, 2018 Community Development Director On hold per developer Landscape and Street Lighting District Assessment Adjustment (mail-in election authorization) Initiated by: Council Direction Jul. 9, 2019 Public Works Director Add to Revenue Strategy Study Session Final Parcel Map No. 82295 for a two-unit residential condominium project at 1602 Loma Drive. Initiated by: Staff Request Oct. 10, 2019 Community Development Director Pending Coastal Development Permit Public Records Request Guidelines Initiated by: Staff Request Oct. 14, 2019 City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager Pending Deputy City Clerk Appointment Emergency Services Municipal Code Chapter 2.56 Update Initiated by: Staff Request Jan. 15, 2020 Emergency Management Coordinator Waiting for State to review proposed language changes Return to Council to discuss a full ban on tobacco sales and to include all available data related to other communities who have adopted complete bans. Initiated by: Council Direction Jan. 28, 2020 Community Development Director Council directed staff to bring item back in June 2021 Consideration of licensing agreement/fees for use of City logo Initiated by: Council Direction Jun. 9, 2020 City Attorney Discussion on Potential Establishment of a City Council Subcommittee Regarding City Finances (supported by Detoy, Armato, Fangary) Initiated by: Other Matters Jun. 9, 2020 Finance Director/Assistant to the City Manager Request to Renew the Agreement to Purchase Parking Meter Equipment and Related Services Initiated by: Staff Request August 11, 2020 Police Chief Follow-up on Mayor’s Pledge Initiated by: Council Direction August 25, 2020 City Manager’s Office/Police Chief Approval of First Amendment to Agreement with the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation for its Annual “Hearts of Hermosa” Event Initiated by: Staff Request December 7, 2020 Community Resources Manager Updating Resolution 15-6988, Rules for the Conduct of City Council Meetings. Initiated by: Staff Request Dec. 12, 2020 City Attorney/City Clerk Approve the Second Amendment to Lease Agreement Between the City of Hermosa Beach and STAR Education to Temporarily Reduce Insurance Liability Limits Initiated by: Council Direction February 9, 2021 Community Resources Manager Waiting for STAR organization to find suitable solution