Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES-97-5885 (COST SAVINGS & TAXPAYERS PROTECTION/OPPOSE COST SAVE)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 97-5885 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH OPPOSING THE "GOVERNMENT COST SAVINGS AND TAXPAYERS PROTECTION AMENDMENT" WHEREAS, Every day billions of dollars of critical building, engineering and design projects are underway from seismic retrofitting to flood control to schools and hospitals; and, WHEREAS, State, regional and local governments are currently allowed the flexibility to contract with private firms, on a competitive basis, to design these projects; and, WHEREAS, This process allows government the essential flexibility to use private firms to deliver a project on time and cost effectively; and, WHEREAS, The so-called "Government Cost Savings and Taxpayers Protection Amendment" completely changes the process by giving the state bureaucracy a virtual monopoly on designing every project; and, WHEREAS, This will thereby force cities, counties, schools, special districts, regional governments and even many private businesses to use the state bureaucracy to design roads, parks, hospitals, health clinics, schools, water treatment facilities, flood control walls and other critical structures - including all engineering, design, geological and environmental work; and, WHEREAS, Virtually every school and hospital has been designed by private firms, not state government; and, WHEREAS, The proposed initiative eliminates local control and forces communities to rely on the out-of-town state bureaucracy for the design work; and, WHEREAS, Local governments would not be able to hold the state bureaucracy accountable; and, WHEREAS, The initiative gives one state politician enormous power to decide who gets tens of thousands of design and building projects worth billions of dollars; and, WHEREAS, The state controller would have to analyze tens of thousands of proposed contracts per year costing taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, in additional expenses; and, 4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, To meet potential workload demands, hundreds, if not thousands, of state employees would need to be employed and paid, even if no projects were underway; and, WHEREAS, Taxpayers would pick up the tab for billions in extra costs for projects, lost jobs and more state employees to evaluate projects; and, WHEREAS, This could mean more delays on important projects such as the Bay Bridge retrofit and the Alameda Rail Corridor in Los Angeles County. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach opposes the so-called "Government Cost Savings and Taxpayers Protection Amendment" that will cost our cities, counties, special districts and economy millions and we support the efforts of the growing coalition of Taxpayers Fed Up With More State Bureaucracy (Fed Up)!. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16th day of October, 1997. PRESIDENT o f tbi City T: Y tjA or ine t.a y or riermosa neaun, t,amui iva M AP ROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ]HERMOSA BEACH I, Naoma Valdes, Deputy City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-5885 was duly and regularly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach at an Adjourned Regular Meeting of said Council at the regular place thereof on October 16, 1997. The vote was as follows: AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Mayor Reviczky NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None DATED: October 20, 1997 Deputy City Clerk