Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC_Minutes_1991_10_15MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HELD ON OCTOBER 15, 1991, AT 7 :00 P.M. IN THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Meeting called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chrnn. Ketz. Pledge of Allegiance led by Comm. Merl. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Also Present: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl, Chrnn. Ketz None Ken Robertson, Associate Planner, F. Paul Corneal, Building Inspector, Sylvia Root, Recording Secretary CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION by Comm. Mel, seconded by Comm. Di Monda to approve the following Consent Calendar items: Resolution P.C. 91-57, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #22916 AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A TWO-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 228 ARDMORE AVENUE. Resolution P.C. 91-60, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST FOR AN EXCEPTION FROM SECTION 13-7(b) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE TO EXCEED 50% OF REPLACEMENT VALUE AT 2010 MONTEREY BOULEVARD. Resolution P.C. 91-63, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO AUTHORIZE AUTO SALES IN CONJUNCTION WITH AUTO- MOTIVE REPAIR, AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, BUGGE BUILDERS. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl and Chmn. Ketz None None None COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Ms. June Williams, Manhattan Avenue, commented she supports Agenda Item 10. She was informed by Chmn. Ketz that agenda items must be discussed in order, not during "Communications". 1 P.C.Minutes 10/15/91 PUBLIC HEARING LEGAL DETERMINATION HEARING TO DETERMINE THE LEGALITY OF AN EXISTING DUPLEX LOCATED AT 2104 MONTEREY BOULEVARD. Recommended Action: To determine said property to be legal for a single-family dwelling and require conversion of the existing duplex to a single-family dwelling. Inspector Corneal, representing the Building Department, discussed the zoning history and information pertaining to this property, stating the change from single to dual dwelling was not done through permit documentation, al though completed many years ago. Additionally, the dishwashers and an electrical panel are in substandard condition. Removal of one kitchen and installation of an interior stairway are recommended to accomplish the requested conversion to a single-family dwelling. Comm. Marks stated the property dimensions on the drawing supplied to the Commission are inaccurate and requested drawing accuracy. Mr. Corneal stated the Assessor's map was utilized. Comm. Marks and Mr. Corneal discussed the actual footage of the land and building. Comm. Merl and Mr. Corneal discussed the fact that the property owner had previously signed a deed restriction in 1981. Public Hearing was opened by Chmn. Ketz at 7:10 p.m. Mr. John ~oodwin, 2104 Monterey Blvd., stated at the time of his purchase 1.n 1968, he was told the property was a nonconforming duplex. He gave his experience history in dealing with the City as a result of the construction of a bedroom over the garage, his signing of an "inaccurate" deed restriction, an evicted tenant's complaints against him and the problems, legal fees and other costs relating to his efforts to retain his duplex as a duplex. He asked that the application be approved, allowing him to retain the duplex, not requiring conversion to a single dwelling. Chmn. Ketz and Comms. Merl and Di Monda discussed the one-dwelling building permit and deed restriction form signed by Mr. Goodwin, who explained these forms were misinterpretations, signed by him out of frustration and lack of an attorney being present. The property assessor's records, permit requirements, Mr. Goodwin's previous tax returns, property usage and the existence of neighboring duplexes were discussed with Comms. Merl and Marks. Comm. Di Monda asked about the research conducted to obtain variance records, to which Mr. Corneal outlined his research efforts. Comm. Di Monda discussed the disqualification of the lot for two units under the old law resulting from it's being under 30 feet with Mr. Goodwin, with Mr. Goodwin questioning the measure- ments and requirement. Mr. Corneal stated an inspection had previously been requested and denied by Mr. Goodwin, to which he disagreed, stating he had repeatedly made his home available for inspection of which was never performed. 2 P.C.Minutes 10/15/91 Mr. Gustoff Verner, 2026 Monterey Blvd., stated Mr. Goodwin good neighbor who improves the entire neighborhood as maintaining his own property in excellent condition. Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 7:46 p.m. J.S a well Comms. Marks requested accurate information as to property building location. Comm. Merl stated the property usage is the basic question, noting the documents state "single-family dwelling", commenting the Commission must be concerned with the legal use of the property, to which Chmn. Ketz agreed. Comm. Di Monda discussed the purchase history of the property and lack of legal conversion with Mr. Goodwin. MOTION by Chmn. Ketz, seconded by Comm. Merl, to approve Staff's recommendation and determine the property is a legal single-family dwelling. AYES: NOES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl and Chmn. Ketz None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CON 91-5/PDP 91-7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #22886, AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A TWO-UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 143 MANHATTAN AVENUE (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 17, 1991 MEETINGS) Recommended Action: amendment. To approve said Conditional Use Permit Assoc. Planner Robertson stated the recommendation was based upon the understanding additional, detailed renderings would be received from the applicant, which if not received, the recommendation is for continuance. Previously, the Commission stated concern and requested clarification for architectural features, side yard level, ground floor bedroom and interior stairway. Mr. Robertson noted revisions have been submitted raising the ground floor and exterior feature description, but has not addressed changing the ground floor plan. Staff feels this ground-floor • plan is not inconsistent with ones previously approved. Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Ketz. at 7:56 p.m. Mr. Ron Riggs, 143 Manhattan Avenue, stated he could not afford another art rendering, but has given a revised plan to the Commission. Mr. B. Barsoum, project architect, discussed changes made to the decorative materials, costs, and landscaping. Comm. Marks noted his feeling that this is a three-story building and discussed the grading from the street to the alley with Mr. Barsoum, establishing a 3-foot difference. Messrs. Riggs and Barsoum noted their con- fusion as to what the Commission is requesting prior to approval. 3 P.C.Minutes 10/15/91 Comm. Di Monda noted objection to creating a retaining wall, setting a precedent, suggesting the plans might be flipped to alleviate this problem. Mr. Riggs objected to this idea, as well as any changes to the downstairs area, while agreeing to changes in grading and landscaping requirements, with Mr. Barsoum's concurrence, after discussion with Comm. Di Monda. Comms. Marks and Di Monda objected to a raised grade, retaining wall and the quality of the drawings provided and requested new concise, clear, accurate drawings be submitted to the Commission. Mr. Riggs explained the efforts he and Mr. Barsoum have made trying to comply with the Commission's requests and requested clear definition in order to receive Commission approval. Chmn. Ketz felt the issues should be clearly addressed to alleviate any misunderstanding. Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 8:28 p.m. Comms. Marks and Di Monda responded to the request for clarity by stating: (l) submitting architectural renderings for review by the Comrntssion, (2) resolve the potential of a downstairs rental unit, (3) minimization of retaining walls, (4) window-size indication and more detail on elevations, and (5) accurate and internally consistent set of plans. Comm. Merl concurred with concerns relating to the downstairs configuration and the retaining wall. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Marks, to continue this application to allow the applicant the opportunity to address the issues in question and to respond to the Commission. AYES: NOES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl and Chmn. Ketz None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None A break was taken from 8:26 to 8:40 p.m. CON 85-15 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR AN ADDITION OF A MEZZANINE LEVEL TO AN EXISTING FOUR-UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 1107 LOMA DRIVE. Recommended Action: amendment. To approve said Conditional Use Permit Assoc. Planner Robertson stated Staff is recommending approval, subject to conditions, defining the building and zoning requirement history, and explained the requested building additions. Staff is recommending the exterior stucco and windows match the existing structure and the decks be widened to 7 feet to bring open space up to code, noting the addition is less than 50% and may be approved with the 5 '4" decks. Comm. Marks discussed parking requirements with Mr. Robertson Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Ketz at 8:45 p.m. Mr. Jerry Compton, 1200 Artesia Blvd., Ste. 300, architect, stated the four owners have agreed to the building changes, disagreed with 4 P.C.Minutes 10/15/91 the open space (deck) area requirement and definition of "open space" and stated the building height would not be increased above the roof peak. He explained the excellent construction and stress control of the original construction of the building, stating the addition would "build onto" this original construction. Comm. Marks discussed agreement of the owners, egress and footing/wall compensation with Mr. Compton. Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 8:58 p.m. Comm. Di Monda agreed with Mr. Compton regarding open space adjacent to a living area is more valuable than in other areas and felt the Commission should review this concept in the immediate future. MOTION by Chmn. Ketz, seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to approve Staff's recommendation to approve the modification to the Conditional Use Permit, except that no change to the width of the mezzanine deck is required. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Coffllns. Di Monda, Marks, Merl and Chmn. Ketz None None None CUP 91-20 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE SALE OF THE SANDWICHES AND SIDE DISHES IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING BAKERY LOCATED AT 517 PIER AVENUE, HERMOSA CAFE. Recommended Action: To approve Conditional Use Permit amendment. Assoc. Planner Robertson stated Staff is recommending approval, subject to conditions, and denial of the sale of side salads. He described the site accommodations and business, including defining "snacks", amount of display space allowed, the requirement that food be preprepared, and no waitresses or menus utilized to alleviate progression into a restaurant. Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Ketz at 9:05 p.m. Mr. Jim Lienghot, 517 Pier Avenue, described his background, his employment history, his current bakery business and his desire to increase the menu to his customers. He stated most of his customers are "walk-in". Chmn. Ketz asked if he agreed with all the conditions, to which he replied, "Yes." Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz. Comm. Di Monda asked Staff about the parking requirements of this business and restaurants. Mr. Robertson stated the requirements are based upon square footage, not the number of tables. Chmn. Ketz and Comm. Di Monda and Mr. Robertson discussed the "snack" definition vs. "a meal", and display case requirements. Comm. 5 P.C.Minutes 10/15/91 Merl requested the Commission be open regarding the type of food to be served as long as the display area is less that 50%, commenting the issue of floor space vs. square footage to establish parking requirements should be reviewed. Comm. Di Monda observed that general parking is available to this and other local area businesses, and felt the Commission should address this parking situation in the future. Comm. Marks established with Mr. Lieng- hot that his primary business is baking. MOTION by Comm. Merl, seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to approve Staff recommendation, except Condition 3 be changed from "meat and cheese filled croissants and baguettes" to "sandwiches" and the percentage of display window be changed to 50%. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Conuns. Di Monda, Marks, Merl and Chmn. Ketz None None None CUP 91-23/PARK 91-4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW OUTDOOR DINING, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 37 14TH STREET, LA PLAYITA. Recommended Action: To approve said Conditional Use Permit amendment and Parking Plan, and adopt the Environmental Negative Declaration. Assoc. Planner Robertson stated La Playita recently moved to this new location and the Staff Environmental Review Committee had recommended a mitigated environmental negative declaration with four measures. Applicant has requested expansion with an outdoor patio, four striped parking spaces, use of City right-of-way for landscaping and bicycle parking. Staff recommends out-door dining be limited to from 9:30 a.m. to sunset, management is responsible for noise level, landscaping be submitted for approval and the maximum area possible be used for bicycle parking. Staff also believes a finding can be made for less than required parking because of the location, which results in a high incidence of walk-in or bicycle traffic. Comm. Di Monda questioned the hours of operation, noting other local restaurants open earlier and discussed the proposed area location with Mr. Robertson Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Ketz at 9:25 p.m. Mr. Harold Cohen, applicant and restaurant owner, introduced his architect, Larry Peha, who discussed parking and bicycle racks with Comm. Marks. Comm. Di Monda established Mr. Cohen would prefer to open the outside patio at 8~30 a.m. with landscaping in the form of colored flowers and a tree. Chmn. Ketz established the applicant had read and agrees with the CUP conditions. Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 9:29 p.m. 6 P.C.Minutes 10/15/91 MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm Marks, to approve CUP 91-13/PARK 91-4 with a change in Condition 2, changing opening business hours from 9:30 to 8:30 a.m. AYES: NOES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl and Chmn. Ketz None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None STAFF ITEMS MEMORANDUM REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF A BASEMENT. Comm. Marks noted the definition of basement should be discussed at length, by the Commission, looking at the Los Angeles Zoning Code, to assist the Commission in determining and agreeing upon a correct zoning and third-floor definition. Chmn. Ketz requested this item be presented in the November 19, 1991 agenda. DRAWING FROM AN AREA RESIDENT REGARDING THE BILTMORE SITE. Chmn. noted this proposes a restaurant built over a restricted beach. Received and Filed. TENTATIVE FUTURE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA. Chmn. Ketz noted the meeting date of Thursday, November 7, 1991 agenda is filled. Comm. Di Monda asked if an emissions ordinance for the City of Hermosa Beach is progressing, to which Mr. Robertson responded City Council, Tuesday, October 22, 1991, will consider the Commission's request to direct Staff to study this issue. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 24, 1991. Receive and File. COMMISSIONER ITEMS Comm. Merl requested Staff be directed to investigate (l) the issue of open space and directly accessible open space to assure usability, compatibility and livability, comparing other cities ordinances, and ( 2) restaurant parking requirement determination guidelines. He stated customer volume should be the critical factor, to which Comm. Di Monda agreed. Mr. Robertson noted the pending ballet measure which may enable a more comprehensive review of residential standards. Comm. Di Monda didn't feel the ballot should delay or effect open space apportionment. Comm. Di Monda also asked if Staff would be presenting the 50% remodel ordinance to the Commission. Mr. Robertson was not aware of any such plans. Comm. Di Monda noted dissatisfaction with the current ordinance, discussing this ordinan~e and value determination with Chmn. Ketz. 7 P.C.Minutes 10/15/91 MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Merl, to adjourn at 9:48 P.M. No objections; so ordered. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of October 15, 1991. ~b~ Secretary Date 8 P.C.Minutes 10/15/91