HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC_Minutes_1992_01_07MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH HELD ON JANUARY 7, 1992, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Meeting called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz.
Pledge of Allegiance led by Comm. Di Monda.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
Also Present:
CONSENT CALENDAR
Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl (arrived at 7:06
p.m.), Suard and Chmn. Ketz
None
Michael Schubach; Planning Director,
Edward Lee, Assistant City Attorney;
Sylvia Root, Recording Secretary
MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Marks to approve the
following consent calendar items:
December 3, 1991 Minutes
Resolution P.C. 91-51, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #22886 AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR A TWO-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 143 MANHATTAN AVENUE.
Resolution P.C. 91-69, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUEST
TO ALLOW A REMODEL AND SECOND STORY ADDITION THAT RESULTS IN A
TWO-CAR GARAGE WITH A SETBACK OF 3.5' RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 17'
AND REDUCES THE GROUND LEVEL OPEN SPACE TO LESS THAN THE REQUIRED
200 SQUARE FEET AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 3104
INGLESIDE DRIVE. -·
Resolution P.C. 91-78, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE GENERAL AUTO REPAIR AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AT 2 6 9 7 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, "A. S. A. P. MUFFLER &
BRAKE".
Resolution P.C. 91-79, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR AN
EXCEPTION FROM SECTION 13-7(b) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW AN
ADDITION TO AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE TO EXCEED 50% OF
REPLACEMENT VALUE AT 1040 MONTEREY BOULEVARD.
Resolution P.C. 91-80, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PARKING PLAN TO
ALLOW COMMON PARKING BETWEEN 1095 AND 1063 AVIATION BOULEVARD TO
ALLOW AN ADDITION TO A RESTAURANT AT 1095 AVIATION BOULEVARD.
Resolution P.C. 91-81, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A VESTING TENTATIVE
1 P.C.Minutes 1/7/92
PARCEL MAP #23246 FOR THE DIVISION OF TWO EXISTING LOTS INTO THREE
LOTS AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PROSPECT AVENUE AND REYNOLDS LANE.
Resolution P.C. 91-82, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST FOR A
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM C-2, RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, TO
R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE PARCEL AT 64 10TH STREET.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Suard and Chmn. Ketz
None
None
Comm. Merl
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No one wished to address the Commission regarding a matter not
related to a public hearing on the agenda.
PUBLIC HEARING
PDP 91-10 --PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW A DUPLEX AT 122
FIRST STREET.
Recommended Action: To continue to February 4, 1992 meeting for
applicant to submit revised plans.
Mr. Schubach stated Staff recommends a continuance. The applicant
requested this continuance due to discovery of a nonconforming side
yard, for which the second unit's size must be reduced, chan<Jing
the plans. Comm. Di Monda asked Staff to report on the historical
value of the house at the February 4, 1992 meeting.
Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Ketz at 7:04 p.m.
No one wished to address the Commission regarding this matter.
Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 7:04 p.m.
MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Marks, to continue this
application until the February 4, 1992 Planning Commission meeting.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Suard and Chmn. Ketz
None
None
Comm. Merl
Commissioner Merl arrived at 7:06 p.m.
PDP 91-5 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 64-ROOM HOTEL AND
3,336 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT, AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW
ON-SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RESTAURANT, AND
ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 125 PACIFIC
COAST HIGHWAY, KING HARBOR HOTEL (CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 19 AND
DECEMBER 3, 1991 MEETINGS).
2 P.C.Minutes 1/7/92
Recommended Action: To continue to February 18, 1992 meeting.
Mr. Schubach stated Staff recommended continuance to allow the
applicant to revise plans in response to comments from the
Building, Public Works, Fire and Planning Departments. Mr.
Schubach described the site and the changes of the most recent plan
submittal. He stated Staff was satisfied as far as traffic
impacts, but had recommended right-turn area improvement and a
right-turn only restriction onto First Place and Pacific Coast
Highway. Mr. Schubach noted the ·applicant proposed construction of
a separate restaurant and a 64-room hotel, describing the parking
plans, hotel height and finished site plans. He stated the
applicant has requested a C.U.P. to serve alcohol at the
restaurant, which Staff would recommend approval as long as
standard conditions are applied by the bonafide restaurant.
The project is subject to Precise Development Plan requirements and
Ordinance design guideline. Mr. Schubach stated Staff reviewed
this project for consistency, discussed the observations made and
the resultant additional conditions/changes recommended by Staff.
Mr. Schubach said Staff believes it would be premature for the
Commission to take action on this project, as the applicant needs
additional time to respond to Staff's many comments and to provide
a traffic analysis to the City's satisfaction, and to allow Staff
to consult . with other Departments. He recommended that all
concerns of the Commission be made clear in any motion made.
Chmn. Ketz asked when CalTrans is expected to respond with project
comments. Mr. Schubach stated Staff will be contacting an agency
out of the Governor office to expedite the ·response at the
Commission's direction, noting the initial response was made
approximately three months ago. Commissioner Di Monda asked that
full-sized project drawings be provided in the future and if First
Place closure was discussed. Mr. Schubach discussed previous
proposals for closure, but stated the residents were opposed.
Public Hearing opened by Chmn Ketz at 7:19 p.m.
Jeremy Yeh, applicant's representative, displayed · a proposed
project drawing, discussed with Comms. Di Monda and Marks the
manner of parking for both the restaurant and hotel, ~lan changes,
hotel and pool site location, utilization of view, building access
and the type of customers expected. He stated the plans were a
result of projected financial investment, monitoring of costs and
future profit considerations and would benefit the City of Hermosa
Beach. Comm. Marks noted traffic flow diverged onto one area.
Comms. Di Monda and Merl requested plan consideration to allow
better utilization of scenic views, swimming pool, signage design
and decrease in the appearance of restaurant separation. Comm.
Suard felt architectural significance would be experienced with the
current plan and discussed pool relocation. Chmn. Ketz felt the
access to First Place should be eliminated if it wasn't going to be
improved and expressed concerns about the type of signage.
Howard Longacre, 1221 7th Place, requested that recommendations for
continuance, it not be· printed on the public notice. He challenged
the "grandfather" clause being applied and plan changes, stating he
felt the plans were of a "motel", not a "hotel". He expressed his
concerns that CalTrans is "trashing" the town and increases in
traffic.
3 P.C.Miriutes 1/7/92
Wilma Bert, 1152 7th Street," likes the idea of a hotel but is
opposed to the changes proposed, noted the "grandfather" clause is
not applicable, and objected to additional area traffic and impact
on residents.
Robert Schubert, 553 21st Street, objected to another hotel in the
area, discussing the current economical impact on existing hotels.
Hue Lai, 3100 Marywood Drive, Traffic Engineer, stated the rate of
increased traffic due to the hotel would be low and compared the
rate to commuter and commercial traffic and the hours of impact.
After discussion with Chmn. Ketz and Comm. Marks, Mr. Lai offered
to review the on-site traffic flow and closing of First Place.
Howard Chen, owner/developer's representative, stated the project
will be over $5 1 000,000, discussed the investment potential, resell
value and previous plan reviews, resulting in the proposed plan
being presented. He stated the swimming pool was a minor problem
and could be removed from the plans.
John McQue, 718 First Place, owner of three properties on First
Place, stated he experiences parking, traffic and turning problems
on First Place and First Street. He felt closure of First Place
would be a good option and the existing 20' wall should remain to
afford blockage from commercial.
Public Hearing continued and brought back to the Commission by
Chmn. Ketz at 8:25 p.m.
Chmn. Ketz noted Staff's recommendation to continue. Comm. Di
Monda discussed the definitions of "hotel" and "motel II with Mr.
Schubach, with Mr. Schubach stating the plans meet the II hotel"
requirements. Comm. Di Monda felt it should be classified as a
"motel" since no hotel services were offered. He suggested the
Commission review the definitions, consider making First Place a
cul de sac after surveying the residents, and asked the City
Attorney to provide an opinion on the previously mentioned
grandfather clause the next time this issue is discussed.
The Commission DIRECTED Staff to contact residents through a
questionnaire obtaining their opinions as to First Place .closure at
one end.
MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Marks, to CONTINUE
PDP 91-5 to February 18, 1992, with presentation to the Commission
of full-size plans, a materials board, the City Attorney's opinion
regarding the grandfather clause being p~esented on that dat~.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl, Suard, Chmn. Ketz
None
None
None
TEXT 91-3 TEXT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW DAY CARE FACILITIES FOR MORE
THAN 12 CHILDREN AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN ALL RESIDEN-
TIAL ZONES AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
4 P.C.Minutes 1/7/92
Recommended Action: To recommend approval of the text amendment
and adoption of the Environmental Negative Declaration.
Mr. Schubach discussed the history of this Text Amendment, noting
day care centers with more than 12 children are permitted only in
the C-1, -2, and -3 zones with a C.U.P. He stated expanding day
care centers into the residential areas would allow more day care
centers, expressed concern relating to traffic and noise, noted
additional recommended conditions and suggested additional parking
requirements, and recommended approval of the Text Amendment due to
the flexibility offered for case-by-case review and determination.
Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Ketz at 8:40 p.m.
Mr. Woods, 731 Longfellow, felt this process was conducted to allow
one child care center to open in his neighborhood, stating there
are currently adequate child care centers available.
Wilma Bert, 152 7th Street, did not agree with the ability to open
child care centers any place within Hermosa Beach, no fencing is
required, nor is an age limit of six years old mentioned or
licensing required. She was against approval of the Text Amend-
ment.
Tom Goodwin, 736 Longfellow, opposed the recommended action. He
explained the parking problems experienced by his neighbors and
himself.
Jeff Barnell, 722 Longfellow, questioned the number of required
parking spaces, noting the parking problems being experienced by
residents.
Bill Beck, applicant, supported the Text Amendment.
Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 8:49 p.m.
Commissioner Suard confirmed a C.U.P. would be required if the Text
Amendment were approved. Chmn. Ketz discussed with Mr. Schubach
the State standards for open space at day care center, as well as
additional parking requirements tied to the number of teachers or
children rather than defining a specified number. Comm. Suard felt
additional requirements in terms of buffers were needed. Mr. Lee
noted under State Statute, requirements are imposed and admin-
strated by the County prior to license issuance and retention.
Comm. Di Monda commented the issues are whether to allow extended
day care use within the City with a C.U.P. and the adjacent-to-
commercial lots requirements.
MOTION by Chmm. Ketz, seconded by Comm. Merl, to ADOPT TEXT 91-3
with a change of Section 2, Number 1, to read, "A Minimum of one
parking space for every seven children" and the addition of Section
2, Number 5 to read, "All day care centers shall meet State
statutes and be licensed".
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Comms. Di Monda, Merl, Suard, Chmn. Ketz
None
Comm. Marks
None
5 P.C.Minutes 1/7/92
Mr. Schubach noted the City Council Public Hearing of this item
will be held in approximately one month, with a notice of hearing
being published in the local newspaper(s).
A recess was taken from 9:02 to 9:08 p.m.
HEARINGS
CON 90-8 A REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARC EL MAP #22100 FOR A TWO-UNIT
CONDOMINIUM AT 626 7TH STREET.
Recommended Action: To grant one year extension.
Mr. Schubach stated the applicant is requ es ting an extension due to
the present state of the economy. S taff r ecommends this extension
in order to give the applicant time to record the final map. He
noted a similar request was previously granted only a six-month
extension.
Comm. Suard determined with Mr. Schubach that the application is
within compliance with the current code.
Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Ketz at 9:10 p.m.
No one wished to speak regarding this item.
Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 9:10 p.m.
Comm. Di Monda felt the period of one-year should be reduce to
six-months as was granted to the other applicant.
MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Marks, to MOVE to
extend CUP for a six month period, to June 19, 1992.
AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl, Suard, Chmn. Katz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
NR 91-7 AN EXCEPTION FROM SECTION 13-7(b) TO ALLOW AN ADDITION
AND REMODEL RESULTING IN GREATER THAN 50% EXPANSION TO A SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING AT 1542 GOLDEN AVENUE.
Mr. Schubach described the proposed remodel, property location and
current buildings. He outlined the significant improvements
proposed by t he applicant and explained the deficienci e s of the
side y ard and garage setback, stating exceptions are nece s sary. Mr.
Schubach stated it appeared , from the site visit, i mpact is
minima l. The Commission must ma ke a Finding that the goa l s, intent
and purposes of Article 13 are being met if it approves this
request. Staff believes this finding can be made, allowing a sound
structure to be maintained and expanded with the current noncon-
formities not significant or unusual for the neighborhood.
Comm. Marks asked that a longitudinal study be included for review,
noting first floor columns separated by a pool. Comm. Di Monda
6 P.C.Minutes 1/7/92
discussed Mr. Grove's comments, noting the plans do not reflect
noted changes. Mr. Schubach stated the changes will be made, as a
condition in meeting the requirements. Comm. Di Monda wished to
see final plans prior to making a decision. Comm. Suard requested
more information regarding the setback and adjacent properties.
Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Ketz at 9:21 p.m.
Larry Peha, 67 14th Street, architect, stated the foundation will
be a pad footing below the pool level, explained the lack of stress
on the pool walls, and noted the addition of reverse windows on
both stories. He noted the shifting of the area homes, with the
last survey being completed in the early 1900's. Comm. Marks and
Mr. Peha discussed extending the landing length in front of the
door way for safety and usage.
Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 9:26 p.m.
Comm. Marks as if everything was in conformance to present
standards, to which Mr. Schubach responded on those item mentioned
in the Staff Report are not in conformance as far as zoning
requirements.
MOTION by Comm. Merl, seconded by Comm. Suard, to APPROVE NR 91-7,
allowing an addition and remodel greater than 50% expansion to a
single family dwelling location at 1542 Golden Avenue.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ss 86-12
Comms. Di Monda, Merl, Suard, Chmn. Ketz
Comm. Marks
None
None
SPECIAL STUDY REGARDING ADULT USES.
Recommended Action: To set for public hearing for text amendment
to the zoning ordinance.
Mr. Schubach stated this study was requested by the Planning
Commission and considered a priority. He stated Staff reviewed the
legal case law regarding adult uses, other cities and most current
model ordinance provided by the American Planning Association and
are presenting to the Commission suggested changes pertaining
mainly to adult theater, book store and video store uses which
cannot be prohibited from the City. Definitions, conditions of
approval and permitted uses reviewed and updated by Staff. Mr.
Schubach defined additional changes relating to massage parlors and
out-call services (with are not protected by the First Amendment
and not being protected by the City), which have been referred to
the City Attorney, who will furnish Staff with a legal opinion.
Mr. Schubach asked for suggestions and recommendations from the
Commission.
Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Ketz at 9:31 p.m.
Wilma Bert, 1152 7th Street, questioned the priorities of items
being addressed by the Commission and stated her adamant oppos-
7 P.C.Minutes 1/7/92
ition ordinances being opened for "cruddy" businesses on Pacific
Coast Highway, such as massage parlors, pawn shops, check cashing
or bail bonds businesses. She stated C.U.P.'s are unorganized and
unchallenged.
Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 9:36 p.m.
Chmn. Ketz noted the Commission is amending the current ordinance
and the City is restricted by law and must allow these businesses.
Mr. Lee commented the text changes relating to video stores which
had adult materials are part of the reason the issue was-raised,
explaining Staff's and the Attorney's Offices intent is to assure
restrictive ordinances on the books that will withstand attack and
to regulate adult business uses. Mr. Schubach responded the
amendment will make the ordinance much tougher. Comm. • Di Monda
stated the Commission is not inviting those businesses into the
City.
Chmn. Ketz commented that 100 feet from the exterior wall should be
increased to 200 feet, as it is in other cities. She felt parking
requirements should be included in the report and C.U.P.'s should
be required of the video rental stores. Mr. Lee explained the 100
feet recommendation which complies with a case law which discusses
having a reasonable opportunity within zoning to allow for First
Amendment protected businesses. After discussion, the Commission
requested that Staff return with a report defining the meaning as
far as land available for potential uses if an increase from 100 to
200 fe et were adopted and supply infor.mation as to what other,
neighboring cities are doing. Mr. Schubach agreed the distance
would be changed to linear rather than radius. . The Commission
discussed "adult use zone clustering" with Messrs. Schubach and
Lee, deciding not to direct Staff to investigate further. The
Commission DIRECTED Staff to report the •percentage of commercial to
residential property in the Renton Case city, in order to conduct a
comparison with Hermosa Beach.
MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Marks, to direct Staff
to prepare the Text Amendment, prepare and present the requested
reports relating to changing the 100 feet to 200 feet and the
Renton Case for further study.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
STAFF ITEMS
Comms. Di Monda, Merl, Suard, Chmn. Ketz
Comm. Marks
None
None
MEMORANDUM REGARDING PLANNING COMMISSION LIAISON TO JANUARY 14,
1992 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
Chmn. Ketz stated at the City Council Meeting (1) the Test
Amendment to require relocation impact reports for displacement of
mobile homes, (2) the Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision
relating to a Master Conditional Use Permit Amendment for paint at
spray booth at 501 and 555 Pacific Coast Highway, European
8 P.C.Minutes 1/7/92
Bodyshop, and (3) reconsideration of the Planning Commission's
approval of a Variance to allow a remodel and second-story addition
at 3104 Ingleside Drive will be discussed.
No one wished to discuss these items at this time.
Receive and File.
LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS FOR INSPECTION.
Chmn. Ketz stated in the past Commissioners have requested a
listing of project addresses upon project completion so that a
plan/project comparison may be done.
TENTATIVE FUTURE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA.
Chmn. Ketz stated two hearings are scheduled at the Planning
Commission's January 21, 1992 meeting and a large agenda scheduled
for the February 4, 1992 meeting.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 26, 1991.
Receive and File.
COMMISSIONER ITEMS
Chmn. Ketz asked if, since the height requirement is changed from
40 feet to 35 feet, must the requirements be changed in the S.P.A.
areas, to which Mr. Schubach responded that had been done.
Comm. Di Monda noted the differences between the hotel and
Mr. Schubach noted the definitions are in the Land Use Revision,
along with modification to require the same amount of parking
requirements for both hotels and motels. After discussion, the
Commission DIRECTED Staff to revise the hotel and motel defin-
itions, as well as parking requirements, and present them to the
Commission as part of the Land Use Revision, projected for
presentation in June 1992.
Comm. Di Monda and Mr. Schubach discussed a car dealership which
has an "auto pawn" sign which Staff is requesting removed.
Comm. Suard and Chrnn. Ketz discussed Mr. Longacre' s complaint,
noting that once an item is agendized, the Commission must open it
for testimony whether it is continued or not. Comm. Merl suggested
rewording of the Public Hearing Section. Mr. Schubach commented
that an item recommended by Staff for continuation may not be
continued and testimony taken. The Commission DIRECTED Staff to
include a general statement on Public Hearings saying that
testimony will be accepted for all Public Hearings that are Noticed
if interested parties who would like to give testimony are unable
to attend the scheduled Continued Public Hearing meeting.
9 P.C.Minutes 1/7/92
Chmn. Ketz discussed with Mr. Schubach applicant and Staff
preparations to be completed prior to setting of a public hearing.
Mr. Schubach confirmed that due to required time limits, public
hearings are noticed well in advance, but after notice and during
review, if problems arise or the applicant wishes to change his
plans, a request for Continuance is made. Comm. Merl expressed his
concern regarding the public's participation being unnecessary
limited due to item continuances, resulting in the public's
perception that testimony is not necessary invited. Chmn. Ketz
noted that testimony is welcomed even if an item is continued.
Comm. Di Monda stated it is best for all if the Commission is able
to review plans as soon as possible to allow the applicant to
become aware of what the City is looking for and alleviate future
changes and problems, thereby decreasing the applicants' risks.
Mr. Lee noted and explained the due process requirements for
applicants and suggested the applicants bring _Plans to Staff,
asking for Staff input, suggesting the public hearing should be set
after the applicant has received Staff input and feels he/she is
ready for public hearing. Mr. Schubach stated Staff has been in-
formed by City Council and the previous City Manager to be very
cautious as to what is told to people over the counter and pointed
out the need for additional communication from the Commission as to
what the Commission wants and is looking for. Mr. Lee stated Staff
is well within its limits by noting to applicants concerns
expressed by the Commission in the past on similar projects. At
the public hearing, the Commission evaluates and makes its
determination.
MOTION by Chmm. Ketz, seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to adjourn at
10:30 P.M. No objections; so ordered.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and
complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of
Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of January 7,
1992.
Christine Ketz, Chairman Michael Schubach, Secreta'.'ry
Date
\ I
10 P.C.Minutes 1/7/92