Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC_Minutes_1982-05-04( • MINUTES OF THE PLANNING CCM1ISSICN OF HERMOSA BFACH HELD ON MAY 4, 1982, IN TIIE CITY HAIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 7:30 p.m. Meeting called to order at 7:32 p.m. by Chrrn. Izant ROIL CALL PRESENT: Conms . Cunnti.ngs , Loosli , Peirce , Rue , Smith , Chrm. Izant ABSENT: Cornn. Donnelly AI.SO PRESENT: Panela Sapetto, Planning Director Linda Brayton, TDC APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Conm. Peirce, seconded by Corrm. Smith, to approve the April 20, 1982 minutes with the following correcticn: Page 5, para. 1, should read," ... He spoke against C-3 developnent in that area. " No objection. So ordered. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS Comn~ Loosli recornrended the following verbage to replace the 11th WHEREAS in Resolution P. C. 82-12 , ',-JHEREAS, it is the developer's required responsibility to be properly infonrE.d about proper condominium construction standards." Corrrn. Peirce suggested the following verbage for the 11th WHEREAS in Resolution P.C. 82-12, "WHEREAS, the developer should have examined the developnent standards 1mre carefully to deternti.ne what he could or could not build on that property." Motion by Cornn. Peirce, seconded by Cornn. Curmrings , to approve Resolutions P.C. 82-10, P.C. 82-11, and P.C. 82-12 with the 11th WHEREAS of P.C. 82-12 reading, ''WHEREAS, the developer should have examined the developnent standards more carefully to deternti.ne what he could or could not build on that property." AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Corrms . Cunmings , Loosli , Peirce , Srni th None Coom. Rue, Crum. Izant Comn. Donnelly COMMERCIAL RECREATIOOAL DISTRICT -REVISION OF USES FOR THE C-2 ZONE Linda Brayton of TDC gave staff report. She stated t hat the Planning Comnission was given the option of doing an overlay zone or to add or PLANNING CCM1ISSION MINUIES -May 4, 1982 CCM1ERCIAL RECREATIONAL DISTRICT -REVISION OF USES FOR THE C-2 ZONE (Cont.) Page 2 delete uses from the current C-2 zoning. The Planning Connd.ssion, at their rreeting of April 7, 1982, did not wish an overlay zone. She stated that several uses in the C-2 zone would be applicable to a COIIlffircial recreation district. She added that rootels and visitor serving retail might be added to those uses, and nechanical car washes and warehouse_ storage might be deleted. Corrm. Peirce asked for the difference between a hotel and rrotel, if they are defined in the Code. Ms. Sapetto replied that the only difference is the configuration of the structure; that is , a rootel has parking by the room, and a hotel has parking a!ilay from ~e rooms. Also, nntels are in the C-3 zone, while hotels are in the C-2 zone. Parking requiren:ents for hotels and rrotels are exactly the sam:, two spaces for the managers and one space for each lil1i t. Corrm. Loosli asked if there were a definition of visitor serving retail in the C.Ode. Ms . Brayton replied in the negative. She added that many uses in the C-2 zone would qualify as visitor serving retail, such as stores geared nore towards tourists than the residents. Public Hearing opened and closed at 7 :58 p .m. Motion by Cornn. Peirce, seconded by Conm. Cunmings , to make a Resolution that, having looked at 'What is presently in the C-2 zone, the Conrnission feels that it generally covers anything that would be in cormercial recreation which would satisfy the intent of Item J of the LCP Phase 3 work program. Conrn. Smith asked for the purpose, outside of IJErely corrplying with the requiret1EI1ts of the Local Coastal Canmi.ssion, of examining the C-2 zone for comrercial recreational uses. Ms. Sapetto explained that the I.Deal Coastal Plan requires a study to determine if there are additional anendrrents that should be made to encourage cormErcial recreational uses in the C-2 zone. She stated that the Connrl.ssion nrust determine if it needed to be revised. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Corrms. Currmings, loosli, Peirce, Rue, Crum. Izant c.onm. Smi. th Corrm. Donne l _l y PIANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -May 4, 1982 COMMERCIAL RECREATIONAL DIS1RICT -REVISION OF USES FOR THE C-2 ZOOE (Cont.) Page 3 Motion by Crum. Izant, seconded by Corrm. Peirce, to make a Resolution as follows: ''WHEREAS, the Planning Comnissirn has examined the uses permitted by the C-2 zone; WHEREAS, the purpose of the examination was to determine whether or not the current zoning net the goals providing recreational and coastal-related needs to the area; NCU, THEREFORE, IT BE RESOLVED, the Planning Conmi.ssion has determined that the current C-2 zone does allow an encouraged re creational use." AYES: NOES: ABSENT : CoIIl!E. Cun:mi.ngs, Loosli, Peirce, Rue, Chirn. Izant Corrm. Smi. th Comn. Donnelly EXTENSION OF THE VALIDITY OF CONDITICNAL USE PERMITS FOR SUBDIVISIONS ro ·coINCIDE WITH THE 24..:.MQNTH VALIDITY OF TENTATIVE MAPS Ms. Sapetto gave staff report. She stated that staff recomrended that the Planning Corrmission approve Resolution P.C. 82-14, which 8lIEilds Article 18, Secticm 1801 of the City Code. She noted that the anendnEnt referred to the extension of the tine validity of conditirnal use permits (for subdivisions only) so that they can run concurrently with tentative map approval s. She st ated that the conditional use penni.t currently has a ti.Ire validity of 12 m:mths; whereas, the tentative map has a ti.Ile validity of 24 m:mths. She stated that the Planning Comnission, at their Apri l 7, 1982 neet:ing, passed a Resoluticm of Intention to arrend the City Code so that conditional use permits are consistent with the tllIE franE of tentative maps. She added that a tentative map cannot be approved without a conditional use penni.t approval. Public Hearing opened and closed at 8:12 p.m. Motion by Corrm. Peirce , seconded by Comn. Smi.. th. to approve Resolution P.C. 82-14. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Corrms. Curmri.ngs, Loosli, Peirce, Rue, Smith, Chnn. Izant None Conm. Donnelly PLANNING CCM1ISSION MINUTES -May 4, 1982 Page 4 }{[SCELIANEOUS Planning Conmission Priorities FY 82-83 Ms. Sapetto requested that the Planning Cormrl.ss ion review the tentative priority list and establish their priorities for FY 82 -83 to submit to the City Council. Comn. Peirce stated that No. 7 of the priori ties for FY 82-83 should rrention that the Planning Conmission will coordinate a s tudy and recomrendation for problem areas. Conm. Curmings asked for an update on bootleg units. Ms. Sapetto replied that the process of bootleg units has, up until this tine, been handled by the Building Departn:Ent . Corrm. Rue felt that the Highway ~rcial Corridor -Multi-Use Corridor should go under "have to" for FY 82-83. Corrm. Smith felt that the "like to" s ubjects listed for FY 81-82 should go under ''have to" for FY 82-83. He stated that No. 8 should go under ''have to . " Ms. Sapetto inforned the Planning Comrri..ssion that she had included under No. 6 that the Corrmission could detennine their role in the downtown study. Corrm. Peirce stated that the downtown study is an impact on the City. Corrm. Peirce asked how much effort is involved in the Condominiu:n Developrrent patterns. Ms . Sapetto replied that she was not certain, but that she could do a preliminary study with an intern. She added that the basic question is what effect does the condominium developnent have in the neighborhoods experiencing intense developnent. Conm. Peirce suggested deleting No. 11, relating to the Solar Elerrent. Corrm. Currmings concurred. Conrn. Rue asked if there were any provisions that protect persons' solar rights. Ms. Sapetto replied in the negative. Motion by Comn. Currmings, seconded by. Conm. Peirce, to approve the Priority List FY 82-83, as arrended. No obj ection. So ordered . Ms. Sapetto stated that she would submit the Planning Departrrent budget to the Comnissian, and she noted that she would be keeping the Corrrnission inforrred on the budget workshops. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -May 4, 1982 Page 5 Extension of Tentative Map #13437 at 1512-16 Henmsa Avenue Ms. Sapetto stated that staff recOII1TEnded granting the extension of the map for an additional six m:nths. Motion by C,orrrn. Cumn:i.ngs, seconded by Corrrn. Smith, to approve the six­ nnnth extension at 1512-16 HernDsa Avenue . So ordered. Comn. Peirce objected. STAFF REPORTS Ms. Sapetto submitted a log sheet for the Conmission as a result of Conm. Curming' s request. Chrm. Izant was not in favor of using the log sheet as an official Conmi.ssion docment. Conm. Currmi.ngs offered conposing a log sheet as his duty of Secretary of the Planning C.omnission. Ms. Sapetto requested the Corrmissioners to make note of the Planning Corrmission/City Corneil Work.shop on the Housing Elerrent for May 26, 1982, at 7:00 p.m. COIIm. Smith asked what topics will be discussed at that Workshop. Ms. Sapetto replied that they will discus s the philosophy and intent of the Housing Elenent . She stated that the Planning Comnission will hold a public hearing an Sections 2 and 3 of the Housing Elerrent at their May 18, 1982 neeting. Clmn. Izant noted the two rrerrbers of the Planning Corrmission subcorrrnittee, Mayor MacFaden and Council.nerrber Wood. Ms. Sapetto noted that on July 29, 1982, there will be a workshop on Housing. Ms. Sapetto requested input from the Comnission on-what topics they wished to schedule for the Planning Institute. Corrm. Loosli noted concern for SB 1425 (Ayala) and SB 1534 (Mello) Bills in the weal Governrrent Planning News . He asked if i t would be appropriate to hold public hearings regarding these Bills. Ms. Sapetto replied that the Comrrission is going to have a public hearing on inplerrenting the granny flat ideas. Ccnrrn. Loosli asked if the Planning Cormrl.ssion will hold a public hearing on the Mello Bill. Ms. Sapetto replied in the negative, stating that it was state legislature action. PLANNING CCM1ISSICN MINUrES -May 4, 1982 Page 6 STAFF REPORTS (Cont.) Cornn. lDosli requested that the City study the Ayala and ~11o Bills. CCM1ISSIONERS ' ITEMS None Motion to adjourn at 9:05 p.m. CERTIFICATICN I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and conplete record of the action taken by the Plamiing Corrmission of Henmsa Beach at their rreeting of May 4, 1982. ~(j ~ BCUMMINGS, SECRETARY( ------