HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC_Minutes_1982-11-16. '
MINUTES OF THE PI.ANNING C(l.1MJSSION MEETING OF TIIE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HELD
ON NOVEMBER 16, 1982, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HAIL, AT 7: 30 P .M.
-11eeting called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Cormn. Izant
ROIL CAI.L
PRESENT: Comns. Bro;,m, Izant, Shapiro, Strohecker
ABSENI': Ganns . Loosli, Smith, Chnn. Peirce
ALSO PRESENT: Parrela Sapetto, Planning Director
Comn. Izant was appointed Chai:rman for this rre.eting.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Corrm. Shapiro, seconded by Comn. Brown, to approve the November 2, 1982,
mi.nutes, as subrrri.tted. No o~jections. So ordered. (Chnn. Izaht; abstained.)
APPROVAL OF RESOLUfIONS
Motion by Coran. Shapiro, seconded by Corrm. Strohecker, to approve Resolutions
P.C. 82-34 and 82-36. No objections. So ordered. (Chnn. Izant abstained.)
CoIIIIl. St~obecker stated that Resolution P.C. 82-35, #11, should read, "Each
unit shall provide a minim.m of 200 cubic feet of storage area." No. 12 should
read, '' . . . removal of door leading from the stairs to the den. ''
Ms. Sapetto stated that the concern was that the wall would provide a separate & private
access to the upstairs if it were left in place.
Cornn. Shapiro asked if the item in question will go before the City Council.
:Ms. Sapetto replied in the negative, adding that the Planning Corrmission approval
is final.
Chrm.. Izant re con:mended granting conditional approval , subject to the rennval of
the wall. This would expedite matters for the applicant. If it is determined
· that it is a b earing wall , the app licant will have to reappear before the Comnission.
Cbnn. Izant recoITIIEJ:lded that /fl2 read, ''The wall and the door between the stairs
and the den is to be removed."
Motion by Comn. Shapiro, seconded by Cornn. Strohecker, to approve Resolution
P.C. 82-35 with the foll?wing additions:
No. 11 should read, "Each unit shall provide a minimum of 200 cubic feet of
storage area.''
No. 12 should read, "The wall and the door between the stairs and the den is to
be rerrove d. "
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Comns . Bro;m,
None
Chnn. Izant
Conms. Loosli,
Shapiro, Strohecker
Smith, Chrm. Peirce
n
PLANNlliG COMMISSION MINUTES -Noverroer 16, 1982 Page 2
AMENDING THE ZONING CODE, CHAPI'ER 9.5, ARTICLES III & V, COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL
CONDOMINIUMS , DEVELOPMENT AND CONVERSIONS
Ms. Sapetto gave staff. report. She stated that the City Corneil reviewed the
Planning Cornnission's recorrn'Enclations with respect to arrending the comrercial
condominium ordinance. Staff had presented additional arrendrrents to the City
Corneil, and the City Corneil is TIOW' requesting that the Planning Corrmi.ssion
review those additional am:ndrrents. Staff submitted the following arrendrrents:
1. The additional requiremmt that within 30 days of submitting CC&R's
to the Los Angeles County Recorder, the applicant is to provide the
City with certified copies of the CC&R' s.
2. Section 9.5-34 has the additional requirellEilt that when the intensity
of use has increased the addition of floor area or change in use,
additional parking and loading shall be provided. Furtbemore, a
minimum of two parking spaces per unit shall be required.
Public Hearing opened and closed at 7 :55 P .M.
Motion by Cornn. Shapiro, seconded by Conm. Strohecker, to approve the additional
revisions to Section 9. 5, Articles III & V, Cornnercial & Industrial Condomi.niumc;.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Conrns. Brown, Shapiro, Strohecker, Chrm. Izant
None
Comns . Loosli, Srni_ th, Chnn. Peirce
Motion by Conm. Shapiro, seconded by Coran. Strohecker, to approve Resolution
P .c. 82-38.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CamE. Brown, Shapiro, Strohecker, Chnn. Izant
None
Conrns . Loosli , Smith , Chrm . Peirce
PRELIMINARY FILil~G FEE FDR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPl.'1ENI'S
Ms. Sapetto gave sta£f report. She stated that sta£f was recomIEI1ding that a
resolution be adopted which arrEnds the Zoning Code dealing with residential planned
clevelopnents and co:rmercial planned developrrents. The aIIEndrrent would be to
include a provision for collecting a preliminary filing fee of 10 percent of
the total application fee upon submission of a preliminary developmmt plan.
She stated that prior to this tine, the applicant was required to pay the full
application fee. The City has 30 days with which to approve an application.
After that tine, the city must assist the applicant in completing that application.
She felt it were rrore equitable to charge 10 percent of any given fee.
Chim. Izant noted that this item applies only to special c~rcial and residential
planned developments. It does not apply to the normal applications in the normal
cOIIIDercial and residential zones.
Public Hearing opened at 8: 10 P .M.
Delma Peary, 720 Eighth Street, Hermosa Beach, asked for a clairificatirn of
the filing fee.
PLANNING COMMISSION lfiNUI'ES -Novenber 16 , 19 82 Page 3
-PRELJMINARY FILING FEE FOR RESIDENTIAL 'PLANNED DEVELOR1ENTS (Cant.)
Ms. Sapetto offered that clarification , stating that a $75.00 filing fee is
required in order for the Corrmi.ssion to review a preliminary plan. Paying
10 percent of the fee would be nore equitable t o the applicant, but at the saIIE tine,
it would be equitable to the city by assuring a strong interest from the
applicant.
Public Hearing closed at 8:14 P.M.
Motion by Cornn. Brown, seconded by Corrm. Shapiro, to adopt staff's recomnendation
to streamline and implem:nt the 10 percent application fee for residential planned
developrrents and connercial planned developnents.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Conms. Brown, Shapiro, Strohecker, Chmn. Izant
None
Comns. Loosli, Smith, Chlm. Peirce
Motim by Conm. Brown, seconded by Conm. Shapiro, to approve Resolution P .C.
82-39 with the vl!EREAS' s reconnended by staff.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Corrm3. Brawn, Shapiro, Strohecker, Chnn. Izant
None
Comns. Loosli, Smith, Chim. Peirce
Ms. Sapetto stated that Item 6 of the Agenda was withdrawn because it needed an
Environmental Impact Report.
DEFINING SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS FOR OFF-STREEI' PARKING STALLS IN PRIVATE DEVELOPMENTS
Ms. Sapetto gave staff report. She stated that the Planning Corrmission had acted
to take an interpretation of the Zoning Code to include that the standard parking
stall dinEnsion for parallel parking be included on any type of developm:nt that
is off street. She stated that this item was advertised because it was not known
that the Planning Comnission would take an interpretation rather than.a Zoriing
Code amm.drrent. She stated that the Code is not clear on what the size of a
parallel parlcing diITEnsian should be when an off-street parking space is built
inside a development. The Planning Corrrnission 1 s interpretation was that it be
8': X 24'.
Public Hearing opened and closed at 8: 20 P .M.
Chmi. Izant stated that the standard size for off-street parking stalls in
private developments will be 8' x 24'.
STAFF REPORTS
None
CCM1ISSIONERS' ITEl1S
Motion to adjourn at 8:30 P.M.
• I
n
)
PLANNING CCM1ISSION MINUTES -. Novenber 16, 1982 Page 4
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and complete record of
the action taken by the Planning Corrmi.ssion of Herroosa Beach at their regular
neeting of Novenber 16, 1982.
STEPHAN IZANT, ACTING CHAIRMAN CG1M. SHAPIRO, SECRETARY
DATE