HomeMy WebLinkAbout(HIC)_(Minutes)_(October 3, 1978)MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HERMOSA IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION HELD IN CITY
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, ON OCTOBER 3, 1978.
( 'I .,eeting called to order by Chmn. Foreman at 8:00 p. m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
Also Present:
Comm. Freese,Shiffer, Grimshaw, Freeland, Chmn. Foreman
Comm. Hen\ersen (arrived late}
Ed King, Staff and Lee Alton.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Chmn. Foreman said she had some corrections to make and suggested holding over approval
of the minutes until the end of the meeting. All the Commissioners agreed. So Ordered.
APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION HIC 78-4
Motion by Comm. Shiffer, seconded by Comm. Freeland, to approve Resolution HIC 78-4.
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Comm. Shiffer, Freeland
Comm. Freese, Chmn. Foreman
Comm. Grimshaw
Comm. Hendersen
The motion did not pass. Comm. Freeland questioned the vote. Mr. King explained that the
Commission was only voting on the wording of this resolution as to accuracy. Chmn.
Fpreman noted that everyone voted exactly as they voted in the previous meeting. She
( lded that she was appealing the action to the City Council. Comm Freeland asked what
was the purpose of voting on the resolution. Mr. Alton commented that the purpose was
to vote as to whether the resolution properly reflects the intent of the variance that
was passed. Chmn. Foreman commented that she had not changed her vote from the previous
meeting and was still opposed to the variance. She added that she would vote yes on the
resolution so that the meeting could continue, adding that in no way should her affirmative
vote be interpreted that she was in favor of granting the variance.
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Comm. Shiffer, Freeland, Chmn. Foreman
Comm. Freese
Comm. Grimshaw
Conm. Hendersen
SECTION II -Improvement Commission Items
Chmn. Foreman explained the functions of the Improvement Commission. She said that in
addition to sign and design review, the Commission acts as a recommending body to the
City Council on anything that the Commissioners or citizens feel needs improvement. She
added that the Commission selects outstanding signs and designs for awards.
Beautification Award Nominees:
Chmn. Foreman noted that the two award nominations she had made at the last meeting
were not listed on the agenda. Mr. King replied that the nominations had been left off
the agenda in error. He added that he did have slides to show of Cafe Hermosa for the
~,mmissioner's consideration. Chmn. Foreman noted that she had nominated Cafe Hermosa
HERMOSA IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MINUTES -October 3, 1978 Page 2
(------..,_r both sign and design. Mr. King commented that there had ~een a problem with a temporary
~,gn, but it had been resolved.
Motion by Comm. Freese, seconded by Comm. Grimshaw to present a beautification award to
Cafe Hermosa for design.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Comm. Freese, Shiffer, Grimshaw, Freeland, Chmn. Foreman
None
Comm. Hendersen
Comm. Henderson arrived.
Motion by Comm. Grimshaw, seconded by Comm. Shiffer, to present a beautification award to
Cafe Hermosa for sign.
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Comm. Freese, Shiffer, Grimshaw, Freeland, Chmn. Foreman
None
Comm.Hendersen
Trash Subcommittee Report
Mr. King noted that the subcommittee, composed of members of the Improvement Commission,
the City Council, the Chamber of Commerce and Browning Ferris Industries, has been
meeting every two weeks. Mr. King felt that the September 14th meeting was successful.
He said that BFI provided data on the number of containers,necessary dimensions to house
r~ntainers, type of housing and cost. Mr. King said this data would be expanded on, at
.e next meeting. He said he hoped to have some business representatives at the next
meeting. Mr. King said that a formula for the approximate cost per business had been
computed based upon all the businesses in the area, their location and how much trash
each business generates. He said that the next step, after the next meeting, would be
to expand to a wider group of businesses. He felt the subcommittee can accomplish
something that has been discussed for a long time, the establishment of centralized
trash areas. He noted that the next meeting would be held on Thursday, October 12th.
Chmn. Foreman suggested continuing the rest of the Improvement Commission items after
Sign Review because an applicant had requested to speak early. She added that if there
were no objections the Commission would review the applicant's project first. So ordered.
SECTION III -Design Review
236 -27th Street
Request by James Orland of 660 -18th Street, Manhattan Beach, for a single family dwelling.
Mr. King noted that the landscaping was not indicated on the plan. Mr. Orland requested
to supply the landscaping plans at a later date because the owner is in Europe and would
like to review the plans before they are submitted.
Comm. Freese asked if there would be enough room for trash containers. Mr. Orland said
yes. Chmn. Foreman asked if that would take away from the parking. Mr. Orland assured her
there was sufficient room.
HERMOSA IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MINUTES -October 3, 1978 Page 3
,-~~m. Grimshaw asked the applicant about the exterior finish. Mr. Orland replied that he _,a not know what the owner wanted. Comm. Grimshaw asked why design approval was being
requested at this point. Mr. Orland explained that the project has to be reviewed by the
Coastal Commission. Chmn. Foreman said that ·if the Commission approves the project so it
can be presented to the Coastal Commission, then it has to be a finished plan. Mr. King
suggested that the Commission could conceptually approve the plan on the condition that
the texture finish and landscaping plans be brought back for review.
Mr. Orland requested conceptual approval. He also asked to be allowed one month to
finalize the plan.
Motion by Comm. Freeland, seconded by Comm. Shiffer to conceptually approve the request on
the condition that the applicant present final plans for the texture finish and landscaping
at the November 9th meeting.
AYes:
Noes:
Absent:
Comm. Freese, Shiffer, Grimshaw, Freeland
Comm. Hendersen, Chmn. Foreman
None
Chmn. Foreman explained that she voted no because the policy of the Commission in the
past~• has been not to approve conceptually.
Comm. Grimshaw expressed concern that an applicant could conceivably not come back for
final approval. Mr. King commented that in a case like this, the applicant would not be
issued a building permit without final approval by the Improvement Commission.
30 STRAND
Speaker, Jack Wood of 803 Loma Drive, Hermosa Beach.
Chmn. Foreman asked what type of tile was planned. The applicant answered an unglazed
clay ti'l:e. He explained that the exterior of the entire building would be Spanish style
stucco and that a minor addition was planned for the front of the second story with tile
replacing that portion of the roof. Mr. Wood was asked why the whole roof was not being
redone with tile. Mr. Wood explained that a tile roof would be twice as heavy (presenting
construction problems) and it would be a financial hardship. Comm. Freese asked about the
existing shingles. Mr. Wood said that the shingles could not be seen from the street and
would remain.
Chmn. Foreman asked if the windows in the west elevation would be stationary. Mr. Wood
said they would be sliding.
Comm. Hendersen expressed concern about the roof. Mr. Wood assured her that the shingles
could not be seen from the street. Comm. Freese noted that the apartments behind would
see them. Chmn. Foreman commented that the apartments may not always be there. Comm.
Hendersen said that if the roof was only partially being tiled because of economic
reasons, then she felt the facade was a poor cho~ce. She suggested more continuity.
Mr. Skebe, applicant/owner, said that the garage door would be done in Spanish decor. He
added that as much as possible would be done to give the structure continuity. Comm.
Hendersen asked if tile trim would be installed on all four sides. Mr. Skebe agreed.
HERMOSA IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MINUTES -October 3, 1978 Page 4
J tion by Comm. Freese, seconded by Comm. Shiffer, to accept the request with the improvements
mentioned.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Comm. Freese, Shiffer, Grimshaw, Freeland, Chmn. Foreman
Comm. Hendersen
None
Chmn. Foreman asked Mr. Wood why more roof gardens are not used. He explained that the
only good way to water proof is hot mopping. He added that 5 layers. might last 10-15
years. He said that drainage is also difficult to provide. Chmn. Foreman said that she
had been thinking about encouraging roof gardens because of the small lots in Hermosa
Beach. Mr. Alton commented that a roof garden on a third level would be required to have
two exits. He felt it would be a good idea to encourage roof gardens.
3122 Hermosa Avenue
Request by John Berrardo of 2652 Strand, Hermosa Beach. Mr. Berrardo noted that the
stairway and entryway on the north elevation would be removed because of the property
line.
Chmn. Foreman asked about the landscaping. Mr. Berrardo replied that there would be
landscaping on the front, but not on the sides.
Comm. Freeland felt the project area was somewhat barren in landscaping. He asked
about the City policy regarding trees. Mr. King advised that the City has put in trees in
·ie past. Comm.Freeland suggested that trees be put in the City right of way. Chmn.
Jreman felt that it was a good idea, but thought it should be discussed under ColTMTlissioner's
items. Mr. Berrardo cited instances where trees have been planted in the past but not
maintained.
Motion by'Comm. Freese, seconded by Comm. Freeland to approve the request as submitted.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Comm. Freese, Shiffer,Hendersen, Grimshaw, Freeland,Chmn. Foreman
None
None
1781 Valley Park Avenue
Request by Barney Kersulis, owner for addition and remodel.
Mr. Kersulis noted that grass and shrubs will be planted in the front elevation.
Motion by Comm. Freese, seconded by Comm. Grimshaw, to approve the request as submitted.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Comm. Freese, Shiffer, Grimshaw, Hendersen, Freeland, Chmn. Foreman
None
None
125 -21st Street
Request by Gary Lehman of 22745 Date Avenue, Torrance for remodel and addition. Jay
evenson of 587 -29th Street, representing the architect.
HERMOSA IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MINUTES -October 3, 1978 Page 5
/-•..,\lln. Foreman asked about the existing landscaping in the front. Mr. Stevenson said
_,(at the Oleander bushes will be removed but everything else will remain. He added that
the front entry way will be remodled and low shrubs will be planted around the front.
Motion by Comm. Shiffer, seconded by Comm. Hendersen, to accept the plan as submitted.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Comm. Freese, Shiffer, Grimshaw, Hendersen, Freeland, Chmn. Foreman
None
None
735 Manhattan Avenue
Jay Stevenson of 587 -29th Street representing the architect presented the precise land-
scaping plan. He noted that grass with low plants and low ground cover, shru~s and trees
would be used. Corrnn. Freese commented on the lack of flowering plants used by landscape
architects.
Motion by Comm. Freese, seconded by Comm. Shiffer to approve the plan as requested.
AYes:
Noes:
Absent:
65 Pier Avenue
Corrnn. Freese, Shiffer, Grimshaw, Hendersen, Freeland, Chmn~ Foreman
None
None
Request by Paul Engle, owner for a roof sign.
Chmn. Foreman questioned the size of the sign. Mr. Engle explained that the sign is only
65 square feet and consists of freestanding letters measuring 2 feet by 18 inches. He
added that if the sign was any smaller then it might break because of the design of the
letters. He noted that the letters would be stacked and the sign would measure 5 feet by
13 feet.
Comm. Freese also expressed cone ern about the size of the sign. Mr. Engle felt it was
the right size for the roof. He said that they were trying for a 11 Cape Cod 11 effect by
using white lettering and a white ban around the window.
Motion by Comm. Freese, seconded by Comm. Grimshaw to approve the request.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
MARCH BEAUTIFUL
Comm. Freese, Shiffer, Grimshaw, Hendersen, Freeland, Chmn. Foreman
None
None
Chmn. Foreman suggested a March Beautiful program in conjunction with the mandatory trash
enclosure ordinance. She suggested also making the annual award for outstanding design
and sign. Comm. Grimshaw asked if the Chamber of Corrnnerce would be involved in the March
Beautiful Program. Chmn. Foreman said the Chamber of Commerce is usually involved but
the time and wark is the responsibility of the Commissioners.
HERMOSA IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MINUTES -October 3, 1978 Page 6
.-·-)ln. Foreman described a sidewalk scrub done in the past as a promotional 11 kick-off11
,or March Beautiful. The Commissioners discussed the possibility of painting poles and
taking out weeds. Chmn. Foreman said that it would have to be a group effort. She suggested
voting on it at the next meeting. Comm. Freeland said he would rather donate his time
to the promotional aspect of the campaign.
Councilwoman Tyson spoke about revitalizing the Merchant's Association. Chmn Foreman
said she also had been trying to get it started again. Councilwoman Tyson said she was
trying to get Rudy Guiterrez to sponsor the meetings. Chmn. Foreman suggested the
Improvement Commission be the sponsor if Mr. Gutterrez could not. Comm. Grimshaw suggested
sending letters to the merchants. Councilwoman Tyson felt it would be better to have
morning meetings. She added that she would set up a meeting with Mr. Guiterrez and inform
the Commission. Chmn Foreman noted that based on past experience, merchants seem to prefer
7:30 a.m. morning meetings.
REGULATORY ORDINANCE
Chmn. Foreman explained that there had been several complaints by residents about the
direction the downtown area is taki_ng. She said this proposed ordinance would regulate
business use in C-1, C-2 and C-3 zones. CormJ. Shiffer asked if this would affect existing
businesses. Chmn. Foreman said no.
Comm. Freeland expressed concern for ligitimate businesses. Chmn. Foreman explained that
the ordinance would not prevent businesses from establishing in the City but would
prevent concentrations of specific businesses in a given area .
. . Alton commented on the huge problem with the cost of police work being way out of
line with other areas. • •
Co1T111. Freeland felt there was a conflict with state laws controlling places that serve
liquor. Comm. Shiffer stated that there is no alcohol control by state or enforcement by
city. He added that no more liquor licenses are betng issued. Councilwoman Tyson noted
that licenses are still being issued with conditional use permits. She said that the
laws control when there is a change of ownership. She said the problem is the climate of
use that is being created. She felt that this kind of regulatory ordinance is needed.
Comm. Freeland felt that it is a radical
ways of regulating.
ord1nince, and that there might be other
Motion by Comn. Freese, seconded by Comm. Shiffer to recommend sending the proposed
ord i na nee to the City Counc i 1,.
Mr. Alton suggested recommending that the City Council consider it an emergency ordinance.
The motion was modified to reflect the 11 emergency 11 nature of the recommended ordinance.
Chmn. Foreman suggested meeting with police and department heads. She felt the urgency was to get started.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Comm. Freese, Shiffer, Grimshaw, Hendersen, Chmn. Foreman
Comm. Freeland
None
HERMOSA IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MINUTES -October 3, 1978 Page 7
.,~"'11m. Foreman noted that the next meeting was scheduled for November 7th, which is also
t:1ection night.
Motion by Chmn. Foreman, seconded by Comm. Hendersen to change the next Improvement
Commission meeting to Thursday November 9th. So ordered. Chmn. Foreman asked Mr. King
to inform Mr. Orland (applicant for 236 -27th Street) of the change.
Mr. King reported on a communication from the City Council regarding proposed changes in
notification of sign violations. He added that the City Council agreed with the idea of
printing each agenda in the newspaper.
Mr. King spoke about complaints from residents about improper noticing especially in
regard to corner property. Councilwoman Tyson said the Council felt that publication was
a good idea but she said they were appealing to newspapers to do the printing as a public
service. She felt that adjacent neighbors could also be notified and signs could be
posted in different places. She mentioned that noticing requirements are becoming very
expensive.
Mr. King reported on a memo he sent to the City Council relating to appeals on the 4th
can for the sign at Pacific Park Plaza. Mr. King said that he tried to give the City
Council some idea of past events. He noted that the applicant has appealed the Commission's
decision on allowable sign area.
Mr. King spoke about sign enforcement. He said that no citations had been issued. He
explained that 15 letters were sent out today about violations.
reference to the project at 236 -27th Street, Mr. Alton noted that the roof deck is
a third floor~nd the applicant will be required to provide an additional exit. Comm.
Shiffer askedAthe applicant could put in a fire escape to meet the requirement. Mr. Alton
commented that sometimes the Board of Appeals allows alternate methods if the roof deck is small.
COMMISSIONER ITEMS
Comm. Freeland commented that someone had appealed the Improvement Commission's decision
to grant a variance for the fourth can. He felt that the Commissioners should go along
with majority vote and hoped that no one on the Commission had made the appeal. Chmn.
Foreman advised him that she had made the appeal after checking with staff to make sure
that it was appropriate for her to do so. She felt that there were many inconsistancies
that should be brought to the attention of the City Council. She said that she had requested
an ordinance change to require that comprehensive plans be submitted for shopping center
developments. She added that in this case signs were presented in a piece meal fashion.
She felt the Commission must look at complete, consistant plans. She noted that the address
which was a main cone ern of the tenants is not included in the Park Pacific Plaza plan.
Comm. Shiffer added that Mr. Bacon also wanted a Fata Mat sign, which also is not included
in the plan. Chmn. Foreman commented that there are other large projects coming up.
She felt that it was necessary to make everyone aware of what would be required in the
future.
Chmn. Foreman asked staff for a definition of frontage, Mr. King recommended the Webster
• :tionary's definition. Chmn. Foreman felt that it should be included in the ordinance.
tTifnn. Foreman said that it would be helpful to have the lot size included in the analyses.
"" • I ~·
HERMOSA IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MINUTES -October 3, 1978
-;PROVAL OF MINUTES
Chmn. Foreman made the following corrections to the minutes of September 19, 1978:
1. Page 4, Paragraph 1 -to read Chmn. Foreman asked Mr. King to send a letter
to the Public Works Department recommending sign removal and relocation so as
not be in front of any property.
2. Page 4, 426 -31st Street -Paragraph 2 to read, Chmn. Foreman asked the
applicant if he would consider a facia beam between the 1st and 2nd story,
or the west side elevation.
3. Page 6, Sign Review -Paragraph 1 to read, She added that additional
temporary signs may be applied for a period of 30 days.
4. Page 7, Motion -Number 2 finding to read, There is an expressed hardship
without signing on Pacific Coast Highway, on tenants of the shoppin center.
Page 8
Motion by Comm. Freeland, seconded by Conm. Shiffer, to approve the September 19, 1978
minutes as corrected.
AYes:
Noes:
Comm. Freese, Shiffer, Hendersen, Freeland, Chmn. Foreman
None
Abstained:
Absent:
Comm. Grimshaw
None
1t ion by Comm. Freese, seconded by c'omm. Grims haw, to adj oun the meeting. So ordered.
The meeting adjourned at 10:20 p. m.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes were approved by the Hermosa Improvement
Cammi ss i o.) on OctoJ~g 17, 1978
",:-cgJ,,nM~t. -t:?2.t&?a7✓J
ROSEMARY FOREMAN, CHAIRMAN ~ /~-/f -7F
DATE