Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution 06-13 - (1311 Hermosa Ave)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2s 29 P.C. RESOLUTION NO.06-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA , BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE LOCATION OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ON AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING AT 1311 HERMOSA AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 29, BLOCK 14, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT. The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Cingular Wireless seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit for installation of wireless telecommunications facility pursuant to the requirements of Section 17.46.240 of Zoning Ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for the Conditional Use Permit Amendment on February 21, 2006, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission; Section 3. Based on the evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The applicant is proposing to install four (4) antennas (48 inches tall by 8.5 inches wide on the widest side) on the northeast and southeast corners of the building, and on the west building fagade facing the City parking structure. Most of the other equipment for the wireless facility will be placed within a room on the third floor of the office building, except for two roof -mounted condensing (HVAC) units. The antennas will not exceed the height of the building. The applicant indicates that the antennas are required to service the western portion of the city. 2. The subject lot is zoned C-2, Restricted Commercial. Section 4. Based on the foregoing the Planning Commission finds: 1. The proposed wireless telecommunications facility will be co -located with an existing commercial office building that is constructed on City owned property under a long -tern ground lease. 2. The proposed antennas shall not exceed the height of the existing commercial building. 1 J. D 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 I The proposed location of the facilities will not be materially detrimental to property or improvements in the vicinity and zone. 4. Section 17.46.240 requires that the City consider the extent to which the proposed facility is screened or camouflaged by existing or proposed new topography, vegetation, buildings, or other structures. Section S. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the subject Conditional Use Permit subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The installation of the wireless telecommunications facility located on City owned property shall be subject to lease approval by the City Council. 2. An RF Environmental Evaluation Report shall be prepared by the applicant indicating that the proposed wireless telecommunications facility meets FCC regulations and standards for construction, maintenance and operations ten days after installation of the facility and every two years thereafter the telecommunications service provider must submit a certification report attested to by a licensed RF engineer that the facility is compliant with applicable FCC regulations for RF emissions. 3. The antennas shall be screened by screen walls that will be painted, textured and designed to be architecturally compatible with the existing building facades, and to blend with surrounding materials and colors. No logos or other commercially identifying graphics shall be installed on the wireless communication facility. 4. The proposed roof -mounted condensing (HVAC) units shall be screened in a similar fashion as the existing roof -mounted HVAC units. Section 6. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought 10 I1 12 13 i' 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2s 26 27 28 29 within the applicable time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. VOTE: AYES: Allen, Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. No. 06-13 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of February 21, 2006. Peter Hoffman, Februpa 21 2006 Date