HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution 154-654Name: Madelyn Jonnson
Location: Part of lot 5, block 83, 2nd addition to Hermosa Beach tract
Rezone from R-1 to R-3 To Permit:
Date: Apr i 1 1 , l 968
RESOLUTION P.C. 154-654
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL CERTAIN ACTION REGARDING PROPERTY
LOCATED BETWEEN TWENTY-FIRST STREET AND ARTESIA, ON THE WEST SIDE
OF PROSPECT AVENUE IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, there was filed with this Commission, application for zone amendment
by Madelyn Johnson, affecting property located between Twenty-first street and
Artesia on Prospect Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on March 4, 1968, at a duly advertised public
hearing adopt Resolution P.C. 154-643, denying the application for zone amendment
on that property described as follows:
That portion of lot 5, block 83, of the second addition to Hermosa Beach
tract, beginning at the northeast corner of said lot 5, thence southerly
112.5 feet on the easterly line of said lot 5, thence 351 .8 feet in a
westerly direction to the westerly line of said lot 5, thence northerly
along said westerly 1 ine 112.S feet to the northerly line of said lot,
thence in an easterly direction along said northerly line 345 feet to
the point of beginning; and
WHEREAS, this denial was appealed to the City Counci 1 by the applicant, and
reconsideration of the application has been requested by the City Council
of the City of Hermosa Beach,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, after review of this action, it is the
recorrmendation of the Planning Commission that said appl icant 1 s request for
zone change to re-zone from R-1 to R-3 the property above described, be granted
for the reason that after reconsideration of this particular parcel relative
to the entire area, and to the General Plan, it appears that, at this time,
this is the only practical zoning for said parcel. Further, it is hoped by the
Commission that a new R-3 (R) zone might be adopted in the future, which would
insure the City of the proper develo~ment with respect to this area and other
like areas. The Commission has felt, and does feel, that the general area of
this parcel should be re-zoned to multiple use, but at the time the application
was presented,the Commission did not believe the City had the proper controls
for good development under our presenti~i3RZ6ning:ng.
The foregoing resolution was adopted by the P1anning Commissionat a regular
meeting held on the 1st day of April, 1968, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT;
Comm. Reeves, Noble, Stabler, Hamilton, Boice (Vice-chairman)
Comm. Armer
Chairman Viault
Planning Commission Pg 2 P .c . 154-654
COllVll. Arme r gave his reaso n for voting 11 no11 as fol lows: While I agree with
the resolution, I f eel there are more safe standard s in preventing premature
and inadvi sa ble deve lopment by maintaining the R-1 zo ne at this time.
CERTIFIC ATION
I he reby c e rtify that the foregoing resolution P.C. 154-654, was adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of He rmosa Beach at a regular meeting held on
April 1, 1968. _d §
Dat e < b -?/--/.-f' ~/2tftc ~~
.:/ ~;, Rob?rt Boice, Vice Chairman ,;?Jlt~-lJ, /4tj J/C--?;' /'
/~9hn Ar mer , Secreta ry ·~ .. /