Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution 89-341 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 89-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE BILTMORE SITE TASK FORCE COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION AND FURTHER RECOMMENDING THAT IT BE IMPLEMENT IN THE FORM OF A SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND RECOMMENDING ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 18, 1989, and made the following Findings: A. The Task Force reommendation meets the need to resolve the future use of the publicly owned portion of the porperty known as the Biltmore Site; B. The land uses proposed are compatible and complimentary to each other and to the adjacent uses; C. The limitations and restrictions proposed will mitigate possible negative impacts to adjacent properties and to the community as a whole; D. The best method to implement the Task Froce reommendation is with a Specific Plan area General Plan designation and zone change; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend adoption of the Task F orce recommendation as shown in attached Exhibit A, and further recommends implementing said recommendation with a Specific Plan Area General Plan amendment and zone change with the additional provision that any commercial use must be reviewed by the Planning Commission to ensure compatibility with the open space, urban plaza, and the surrounding residential area. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Comms.Ingell,Ketz,Rue,Chmn.Peirce None None Comm.Edwards -1 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 '--..,/ 2 7 28 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 89-34 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, Ca~lifornia at their regular meeting of_ April 18, 1989. ..,..,.7. .d.. -::: A_/2 4 ~ :Jc~ ~~~ ~='=== Ja~rce, Chairman Mi ch 'ael Schubach, Secretary vAJ~y t()N Date T/pcrsbilt -2 - ( ( ·-· •.•.•-· . ~ : ..... .: GENERAL PLAN A>AEND>AEN-r & zoNE CHANGE AREA a1u>AORE si-rE (PUBLICLY oW ,iED poR-rioNl SPA~ specific plan Area MD: MediUID, uensitY so: _aigh _oensitY os: open space ~ GC: General commer::cia,i cR : commercial Recreation I ==:;;;-;:..._DD~=--~=--===-LJ \G~'\ H;o.,, 80tJl£V/t.e..D ' ' -~, . :;; I HD--~=-~ GC -MANHATTAN GC~ .- 1 AVeN~ G_~ • ~ HD 1~ ~ H.EffMOSA i [ AVENUE:. ~-- GC ·[3 STRANO 05 OS Uf . .,. EXHIBIT A March 21, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of Marc~ 28, 1989 of the Hermosa Beach City Council RECOMMENDATION OF THE BILTMORE SITE CITIZENS• ADVISORY TASK FORCE The Biltmore Site Task Force voted not to elaborate in its recom­ mendat"ion on 'history,_ backgrou~d. ·or rational·e. This .information is available from the written and taped record of·the Task Force's work.· All recommendations of .· the Task 'Force were ap­ proved either unanimously or by at least twb-thirds of the Task . Force. Recommendation: Pursuant to Council direction at your meeting of December 13, 1988, the Biltmore Site Task Force has met its charge and submits the following recommendation: The appropriate use of the Biltmore Site is (l)open space to be used for an urban public plaza, and (2) restricted C-2 Comme~­ cial. Per the attached map, parcel I is to be open space (site's western boundary·to eastern edge of vacated Beach Drive) with remaind~r to be restricted C-2 Commercial. a. Urban public plaza to be defined as a public park/plaza of a passive recreational nature designed by a landscape architect to be compatible with the surrounding downtown and beach area which could include both soft scape and hard scape, . b . C-2 (1) (2) (3) uses to be further rest~icted so that: no hotel/motel to be allowed, eating and/or drinking establishments to be required to meet 65 to 35% food to alcohql gross sales standard, • • only retail and/or restaurant uses not exceeding 30 1 in height and requiring landscaping set back, to be allowed. The now vacated portion of 15th Court is not to be sold and is to be maintained in City ownership. Section of 14th street adjoining .the site is not to be sold and is to be maintained in City ownership. The restricted C-2 Commercial area, parcels #2 and #3, are to be sold (not leased) for private development. Proceeds from the sale of parcels #2 and #3 are to be ear-­ marked for development of the open space portion of ·the site; the balance of the funds to be applied for reductin of any indebted­ ness incurred with acquisition of .the right-of~way. 4- • • C- Any minority report(s) not submitted with this recommenda­ tion shall be submitted no later than the second Council meeting in April. !l-l'd~~. J ~~~; i-£i/ .. ;, ~ ! ~-7'. /'7 ?L-<. G~org . Schmeltzer, airman • -5-