Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05/28/02
Wre.411'/(7d-a-) 744 D,P.— / 9 ))(53. U-4*to, (91-0( D'A /11e/ 0 - "One of the best things people can have up their sleeves is a funny bone." - Richard L. Weaver II AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 28, 2002 Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session Hermosa Beach Community Center, Room 4 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach MAYOR Kathy Dunbabin MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Y. Edgerton COUNCIL MEMBERS Michael Keegan J. R. Reviczky Art Yoon CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman CITY MANAGER Stephen R. Burrell CITY ATTORNEY Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer. City Council agendas and staff reports are available for your review on the City's web site located at www.hermosabch.org CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS 1 PRESENTATIONS CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION TO DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY G. ALEXIS DE LA GARZA CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF MAY 14, 2002: NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda as a business item. 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction, or to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar, may do so at this time. Comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Comments from the public are limited to three minutes per speaker. Members of the audience may also speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; and, 3) during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. The City Council acknowledges receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in written communications. The Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. a. Letter from Gary and Krista Capo requesting consideration of the installation of a three-way stop at the corner of 20th Street and Valley Park Avenue. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 4, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to receive and file memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated May 22, 2002 regarding the minutes of the regular City Council meeting of May 14, 2002. r (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the April 2002 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to accept a donation of $400.00 from Jean Lombardo to be used for the promotional materials for the City of Hermosa Beach street safety program. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated May 15, 2002. Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of May 7, 2002. Recommendation to approve request from the Dig for Kids Foundation and So. Cal. Foundation for Children, both Hermosa Beach based non-profit organizations, to conduct a Beach Volleyball Tournament on the North side of the Pier, Saturday, July 27`h, 2002 from 9am to 5pm; waive the participant/spectator fees; and, approve the event contract. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 13, 2002. (h) Recommendation to accept the $40,000 donation from the Mervyn's Beach Bash event to fund the following programs: Skate Park staffing -$10,000; Hermosa Beach Education Foundation -$10,000; Teen Center (climbing wall) -$10,000; and, Hermosa Beach Community Picnic -$10,000. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 13, 2002. (i) Recommendation to approve the Cooperation Agreement with the Los Angeles County Community Development Commission to continue funding the projects to remove architectural barriers to the disabled at public facilities and authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperation Agreement. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 9, 2002. (j) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of May 21, 2002. (k) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #26019 for a 3 -unit condominium project at 506 11th Street. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 21, 2002. (I) Recommendation to receive and file Project Status Report. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 16, 2002. (m) • • Recommendation to approve a proposal for third party administration of the City's general liability claims submitted by the firm of Colen & Lee and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract for a three year term commencing July 1, 2002 with an option to negotiate a two year extension based on performance. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated May 22, 2002. (n) Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of May 15, 2002. (o) Recommendation to approve Supplemental Agreement No. 1 between the City and Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises for $3,850.00; authorize the City Manager and the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to execute agreement; and, authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within a contingency of $500.00. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 21, 2002. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 02-1220-U — "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING PARTIES ADVERTISED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated May 23, 2002. b. ORDINANCE NO. 02-1220 — "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING PARTIES ADVERTISED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated May 22, 2002. 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4 • 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. a. REVIEW AND RECONSIDER OF PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PARKING PLAN FOR ALTERATIONS TO AN EXISTING RETAIL AND ENTERTAINMENT CENTER TO ACCOMMODATE OFFICES, A HEALTH AND FITNESS CLUB, AND RETAIL USES AND A VARIANCE TO THE 35' HEIGHT LIMIT TO ENCLOSE EXISTING DECK AREAS TO MATCH THE HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING ROOF, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1605 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HERMOSA PAVILION. (Continued from meeting of April 9, 2002). Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution sustaining the decision to approve the Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan subject to the conditions as contained in the resolution, and to sustain the decision to approve the variance to enclose the upper floor deck areas and open area of the parking structure. b. APPLICANT APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 1100 THE STRAND, "SCOTTY'S", AND CONSIDERATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (THE REQUESTED AMENDMENTS WERE FOR ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL; TO ADD BAR SEATING IN THE PATIO AREA; TO ADD AMPLIFIED LIVE ENTERTAINMENT; A TAKE-OUT FOOD SERVICE WINDOW; AND 24-HOUR OPERATION.) THE APPLICANT'S APPEAL INCLUDES PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE INITIAL REQUEST TO LIMIT HOURS OF OPERATION TO BETWEEN 6:00 A.M. AND 2:00 A.M., TO LIMIT LIVE ENTERTAINMENT TO NON -AMPLIFIED, AND TO REDUCE THE BAR SEATING AREA. Letter from Patrick Killen dated May 20, 2002 requesting a continuance to the City Council meeting of July 23, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Continue hearing to City Council meeting of July 23, 2002. 5 • c. REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MINOR AMENDMENT TO CHANGE HOURS OF OPERATION OF AN EXISTING MARKET WITH OFF -SALE BEER AND WINE FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 10:00 P.M. TO 8:00 A.M. TO 12 MIDNIGHT SUNDAY THROUGH THURSDAY, AND TO 2:00 A.M. FRIDAY AND SATURDAY AT 205 PIER AVENUE, ALTA-DENA DRIVE-IN DAIRY. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 21, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution sustaining the Planning Commission's decision to approve the request to change hours of operation. d. REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AT 142 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, THE PITCHER HOUSE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 15, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution sustaining the Planning Commission's approval. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS NONE 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. MASTER PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR CITY YARD. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 23, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Dougherty and Dougherty Architects to complete a study of feasibility to jointly using the City Yard with the School District. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request from Councilmember Reviczky to direct staff to prepare a response to the memorandum from Southern California Edison regarding a proposed rate change (Application 02-05-004). b. Request from Councilmember Yoon to direct staff to report back on a program to set up separate neighborhood parking areas with parking permits for the residents of these areas and study alternatives to enable residents to park downtown infinite hours in restricted spaces. c. Request from Councilmember Yoon to direct staff to report back on the feasibility of publishing an agenda summary in the Easy Reader prior to each City Council meeting. The summary would include Public Hearings and Municipal Matters. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on May 14, 2002. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) a. Name of Case: City of Hermosa Beach v. City of Redondo Beach Case Number: BS075570 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT 7 The Hermosa Beach Sister City Association is incorporated under the laws of California as a nonprofit corporation for certain charitable purposes: namely, to collect and disburse funds to promote friendship and understanding between the citizens of Hermosa Beach, California, and the citizens of Loreto, Mexico (particularly between school-age children of these communities) under the United States -Mexico Sister City Program, and to aid in providing relief to citizens of Mexico in case of floods, hurricanes fires, and other disasters. t A further purpose is to promote understanding and appreciation of Mexican culture and the Spanish language and thereby to help eliminate prejudice and discrimination against persons of Mexican descent in the United States. The Hermosa Beach Sister City Association is currently involved in two special projects in Loreto, as well as our on-going student exchange program. One project is the providing of training and equipment to promote emergency medical treatment for all residents of Loreto. Training is being conducted by two of Hermosa Beach's finest paramedics who have donated hundreds of hours of their own time to training doctors, police officers and regular citizens of Loreto in emergency medical services. This includes CPR, reading vital signs, administering first aid, starting IV's, operating a defibrulator and other procedures that will help save lives in situations where currently people are left without help prior to arriving at the hospital - when it is often too late. The second project helps one of our former student exchange participants from Loreto. Sixteen -year old Miriam Murillo is a beautiful young lady in need of extensive orthodontic and plastic surgery to correct a cleft palate and other facial deformities. She will need to undergo a series of surgeries and treatments at Children's Hospital of Los Angeles over the next 3 years. The doctors and surgeons have agreed to donate all of the medical services Miriam will need at no charge. The hospital expenses will be paid for by the Hermosa Beach Sister City Association and the Loreto Sister City Association. The original estimate for the expenses was $10,000; however, it is now estimated that the actual hospital expenses will be at least double that amount. The Association has raised the $10,000 and will be working over the next year to raise the remainder of the funds. All donations are tax deductible. TAX I.D. No. 95-3710987. Checks should be mailed to P. O. Box 1025, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, marked "Miriam". For more information on our activities, purpose or if you are interested in getting involved, please feel free to attend one of our monthly meetings which are held on the first Wednesday of each month at 7 p.m. in Room 4 of the Hermosa Beach Community Center, 701 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach. ELAINE DOERFLING, President RUDY LIMAS, Vice President MERNA MARSHALL, Secretary DICK McCURDY, Treasurer (310) 374-4072 GEORGE BARKS, BOARD MEMBER U.S./Mexico Sister Cities Association, Inc. (310) 379-2538 NEWAFFILIATIONS Cities or community organizations interested in becoming involved in the Sister City movement are invited to contact the US/ MEXICO Sister City Association headquarters listed on the back page. If you don't yet have a Sister City, that office can provide you with a roster of cities in Mexico wishing to establish such a program and assist you in making the initial contact. It is desirable to select a city in Mexico with whom you have something in common, i.e., similar geog- raphy, population, individual or commercial inter- est; is it farming, manufacturing, are you near the Ocean or on a river or lake? US/MSCA's list can give you chat information. Remember, this is "people -to -people", and before undertaking the establishment of an affiliation you should have an organization of citizens in your com- munity willing to fully support the effort. Your city government can play a definite and important role in this endeavor, but first and foremost, people in your community should be behind the plan. The strained relations between Mexico and the United States is obvious to all of us as we read the newspaper headlines about problems of immigration, drug imports, trade barriers, etc. More than ever, the role that Sister Cities can play to bring people of both countries to a better mutual understanding is evident. As members of Sister Cities, we are, perhaps, in a unique position to build bridges between the people of these two countries at a time when it is most needed. We all know that. Sister Cities is a people -to -people organization. We can help each other, not only in providing various types of assis- tance, but through better understanding of the situation in Mexico and the problems they face on a day-to-day basis. By building an even stronger Sister Cities organi- zation and focusing on new projects, hopefully we can build more enthusiasm among the membership and more accomplishments in the people -to -people bridge -building that we all so anxiously want to do. —Anonymous. CITIZEN DIPLOMACY - THE LEGEND OF EISENHOWER The Sister City Program is a living legacy left by the late President Dwight D. Eisenhower. He conceived the program and initiated it in 1956, as a new approach to securing peace around the world through the establishment of personal, people -to -people friendships between Americans and the peoples of other nations. President Eisenhower, who often proclaimed that he would rather be known to history for his contri- butions toward world peace than for his accomplish- ments as a President and a General, deplored the fact that throughout history, international diplo- macy had failed to keep the peace or to prevent war. He foresaw that the people -to -people idea, fostered by a Sister City program involving hundreds of thou- sands of people in cities throughout the world, could be a massive form of citizen diplomacy that might succeed in doing what the nations of the world had been unable to accomplish through diplomatic efforts. The late Ambassador George V. Allen, who, until his death served as President of People -to -People, Inc., stated in a eulogy at the time of President Eisenhower's death in 1969: "Now is the time and the opportunity for all Americans, as well as the citi- zens of the many friendly nations, to join the spirit of People -to -People, and build in Eisenhower's remembrance not just an inert monument of stone, but a living memorial that will carry on his drive to universal understanding and peace." THAT IS WHAT THE SISTER CITY PROGRAM IS STRIVING TO DO U.S./Mexico Sister Cities Association 4.11111111111111111111.111111111111111.011 Telephone number (a...1M,;'S/c ) 00.1110.1.111111, 37- X538 \NWk/ . US 1 SCA- oRg United States/Mexico Sister Cities Association, Inc. Dedicated to greater understanding and friendship between the nations of the United States and Mexico WHAT IS A SISTER CITY? A "PEOPLE TO PEOPLE" PROGRAM The Sister City program is a dedication of friendship and understanding between peoples of different cultures and different attitudes...it is an affirmation of one people's good- will toward another people...it is the Golden Rule applied to international practice...it is a recognition that we are all brothers in the human race...and it is, perhaps, a last hope for peace in our times and for -the survival of our world. The grass-roots strength of the Sister City move- ment rests on its "people -to -people" programs. Thousands of citizens in more than 250 cities throughout the United States of America and the Republic of Mexico are now participating in the direct -contact programs of the individual Sister Cities affiliations which make up the US/MSCA. These range from cultural, athletic, and student ac- tivities to professional, industrial, and commercial exchanges of every form. Each program is tailored specifically to the needs of the individual city affiliations. This is where the real efforts and goals envisioned by President Dwight D. Eisenhower are being realized, and where the bridge of true friendship and understanding lead- ing to lasting peace in the world is being built. To those engaged in the Sister City program it is much more than this. It is discovery; it is adven- ture; it is a new dimension of self-awareness and awareness of others...AND, IT IS FUN. U.S./Mexico Sister Cities Association is incorporated as a nonprofit organization under Section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. All contributions and donations to the Association are tax deductible under Section 170 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code. THE UNITED STATES/MEXICO SISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION (US/MSCA) The United States/Mexico Sister Cities Asso- ciation was established in 1962. It has a National Board of Directors which exists primarily to provide information and organizational support for cities with existing affiliations between the United States and Mexico and for those wish- ing to establish such programs. US/MSCA serves as a clearing house for information, as a reference source for its affiliated members on both sides of the border, and as an arbiter on matters of protocol. It provides assistance to new cities seeking to es- tablish Sister City relationships and for existing af- filiations which may need help in getting programs underway or in reviving those that are faltering. In the 1980's, a Mexican counterpart, Asociacion Nacional de Ciudades Hermanas, was formed. Most Sister Cities' activities are conducted on an individual, city -to -city basis, and each city is respon- sible for and autonomous in the conduct of its own relationship with its. Sister City. However, the Associations sponsor a series of major events each year in which all affiliated cities are urged to par- ticipate. The purpose of these activities is to provide a platform for strengthening the programs of all the Sister Cities by an exchange of ideas and mutual support. Now that the North American Free Trade Alliance (NAFTA) has gone into effect, both associations are making plans to accept sister -city affiliations with Canada. Grier seekingaffiationreLrewhenintheworlit outside Mexico, are invited to contact Sister Cities International in Alexandria, VA. ANNUAL MEETINGS An annual National Conference is held yearly in each country. Delegates from affiliated cities gather to discuss mutual problems, elect as- sociation officers, and plan programs for the coming year. Business matters conducted at these meetings include various workshops which offer information about con- ducting student exchanges; advice relating to customs problems which frequently arise during the exchange of equipment and other materials between Sister Cities; fund-raising advice, and any other subjects which are of general interest to the member -cities. In addition, an International Convention of U.S. Mexico Sister Cities alternates each year between the countries. These international meetings are colorful and rewarding events that greatly strengthen the spirit and resolve of all who participate in them. This is the one event at which the rank -and -file members from both coun- tries can join for a reexamination of their program goals and a reaffirmation of the broader goal for which they are all working so hard. Featured speakers at these gatherings have included U.S. Ambassadors to Mexico and other Department of State officials, educators, and journalists who know Mexico from having lived and worked there. Every year several major cities vie spiritedly to be selected as host for the coming year's meeting and a gala atmo- sphere resembling a political convention often prevails. Each conference also includes the selection of two US/ Mexico Sister Cities Youth Ambassadors, one from e• country, who reign for the next year as Sister City Queens. In addition to the national and international meetings, US/MSCA also sponsors a series of ongoing events of interest and value to all. These include a "Day of the Teacher"; art exchanges between the schoolchildren of the two countries; "Pen -Pal" programs, and a Sister City Barbecue, is held each year in the spring. The Association publishes a bi-monthly newsletter which provides news about the individual city activities in the two countries, as well as of the national organization's activities. In addition, it provides a variety of "self-help" informational brochures for member cities and prospec- tive members. May 20, 2002 Mayor Kathy Dunbabin 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mayor Dunbabin: I continue to be concerned for the safety of my son, and all other children that live and play in the Valley Park Avenue and 20th Street vicinity. Our family resides at 1948 Valley Park Avenue at the corner of 20th Street. Our lot is fenced, but there is the occasion when Dane will go over the fence to visit his friend, Chuck Livergood, who lives across the street from our house on 20th. On several occasions we have all been in the street at one time or another visiting as neighbors when a 'vehicle comes speeding down the street. We as adults have had to jump out of the way of a driver not paying attention. On several occasions we have all had an opportunity to yell at drivers, step in front of their cars asking them or pleading with some to just please slow down for the safety of all. Not just my son but all children and adults wishing to make our neighborhood a safe environment for all concerned. Drivers do not slow down as they come in either direction on 20th Street, approaching the intersection at Valley Park Avenue. As observed in your traffic study there are several children that cross at that intersection. There have been several incidents where pedestrians were nearly hit as they stepped out to cross the street. The current speed limit in residential areas is 25 miles per hour, and is still fast enough to kill or maim a pedestrian. I have addressed all other venues for the safety of my child, none of which hold the power that a STOP sign does. Please give us some peace of mind and install a three-way stop at the corner of 20th and Valley Park Avenue. Sincerely yours, Gary and Krista Capo cc: City Council members Concerned Parents City Manager • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: City Clerk DATE: May 22, 2002 SUBJECT: Minutes of the Regular meeting of May 14, 2002 The minutes of the City Council's regular meeting of May 14, 2002 will not be available at the May 28, 2002 meeting. The minutes will instead be presented for approval at the next regular meeting of June 11, 2002. Thank you. Elaine Doerfling, City 'perk. 1 VOUCHRE2 05/09/02 15:04 ---> VOID CHECKS CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 029094 VOID PAGE 1 2b VOUCHRE2 05/09/02 15:04 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 29067 05/09/02 011437 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIAL A TAXI SERVICE/MARCH 29068 05/09/02 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 29069 05/09/02 006290 AIR SOURCE INDUSTRIES 29070 05/09/02 009366 AQUA FLO 29071 05/09/02 000407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY 29072 05/09/02 011570 KATE BARRETT 29073 05/09/02 000252 BEACH TRAVEL 29074 05/09/02 008522 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL INC. 29075 05/09/02 011575 BNY WESTERN TRUST COMPA 29076 05/09/02 011076 ANDRONIKI BOSSONIS 29077 05/09/02 000163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 29078 05/09/02 011567 RENNAE BREWER 29079 05/09/02 011545 ERIC BUHLMANN 29080 05/09/02 007611 CARMEN'S UNIFORM 29081 05/09/02 000332 CRAIG CASNER 29082 05/09/02 007837 WILLIAM CHARLES 29083 05/09/02 000153 CINTAS CORPORATION BATTERY & BELT CLIP AIR TANKS FILLED/APRIL 2002 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/3/02 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/4/02 DOOR REPAIR/APRIL 2002 KEYS MADE FOR RM 4 KEY MADE/4/02 MASTER KEY MADE/COMM CTR/4/02 KEYS MADE/PHILLIPS KEY MADE/RICKEY KEYS MADE/FINANCE CITATION REFUND AIRFARE/DARRYL POWERS/6/1-11 MEDICAL SUPPLIES/MARCH 2002 LAMA ASSESSMENT PR.E PAY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/BD-03 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/BD-04 PRISONER LAUNDRY/APRIL 2002 PRISONER LAUNDRY/APRIL 2002 UNIFORM RENTAL/APRIL 2002 HAND SOAP PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 UNIFORM RENTAL/APRIL 2002 HAND SOAP/APRIL 2002 PRISONER LAUNDRY/APRIL 2002 PRISONER LAUNDRY/4/02 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND CLASS REFUND CLIPBOARDS WORK GUARANTEE REFUND # 10965 PER DEIM/5/6-5/11/02 UNIFORM RENTAL/APRIL 2002 HAND SOAP PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 UNIFORM RENTAL/APRIL 2002 HAND SOAP/APRIL 2002 ACCOUNT NUMBER 145-3404-4201 001-2201-5401 001-2201-4309 105-2601-4309 001-6101-4309 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4601-4305 001-2101-4309 001-2101-4309 001-3104-4309 110-3302 001-2201-4317 001-2201-4309 618-2253 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-4202-4187 001-4204-4309 001-4202-4187 001-4204-4309 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-3115 001-2111 001-2201-4305 001-2110 001-2101-4317 001-4202-4187 001-4204-4309 001-4202-4187 001-4204-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 308.00 200.26 140.80 349.68 203.06 70.00 17.43 3.90 15.59 23.38 3.90 3.90 52.00 148.50 36.00 8,192.93 558.60 176.40 74.37 26.70 89.99 8.66 89.99 8.66 37.45 38.26 161.00 40.00 71.34 1,600.00 300.00 89.99 8.66 89.99 8.66 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 308.00 200.26 140.80 552.74 138.10 52.00 148.50 36.00 8,192.93 735.00 374.08 161.00 40.00 71.34 1,600.00 300.00 i VOUCHRE2 05/09/02 15:04 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME • • 29084 05/09/02 000325 COAST GLASS COMPANY 29085 05/09/02 007809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 29086 05/09/02 010364 COUNTY OF ORANGE 29087 05/09/02 010724 CPRS 29088 05/09/02 000850 L. N. CURTIS 29089 05/09/02 008855 D & D DISPOSAL, INC. 29090 05/09/02 011425 DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION R 29091 05/09/02 008175 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES 29092 05/09/02 008838 JEFF FRALEY 29093 05/09/02 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIFORM RENTAL/APRIL 2002 HAND SOAP/APRIL 2002 AMBER GLASS/CLARK BUILDING OFFICE SUPPLIES/#7785/4/02 RETURNED MERCHANDISE/7785 OFFICE SUPPLIES/7785 FIREARMS LASER TRAINING TRAINING CLASS/JUNE 8 2002 SHIPPING CHARGES DUE DEAD ANIMAL DISPOSAL/4/2002 ARCHITECTS CONTRACTORS GUIDE REIMBURSE LIABLITY TRUST ACCT CITATION REFUND 005125 MARIA GHASSEMI PETTY CA REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 CASH/3/21-5/8 29095 05/09/02 011406 GLOBAL STEEL PRODUCTS C RESTROOM PARTITIONS INSTALLED 29096 05/09/02 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. TEMP BUILDING INSPECT/4/16-30 TEMP BUILD INSPECT/4/16-30/02 3 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4202-4187 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-2101-4317 001-4601-4317 001-2201-4309 110-3302-4201 001-4202-4305 705-1209-4324 110-3302 001-1101-4319 001-1121-4305 001-1101-4305 001-2101-4305 001-4202-4305 001-4202-4317 001-1202-4317 001-2201-4305 001-2201-5401 001-2101-4317 001-1203-4305 001-2101-4187 001-4601-4305 715-1206-4309 001-4101-4305 001-4101-4317 001-4201-4305 001-4201-4317 001-4204-4309 001-2101-4313 001-3904 001-4601-4317 125-6101-4201 001-4201-4201 001-4201-4201 PAGE 3 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 89.99 8.66 295.95 38.29 38.29 86.00 39.12- 39.12 86.00 302.00 302.00 45.00 45.00 6.58 6.58 264.00 264.00 59.96 59.96 5,412.80 5,412.80 55.00 55.00 100.18 16.24 11.18 33.33 5.47 127.33 17.42 10.00 21.64 35.00 34.94 82.75 78.42 75.00 91.30 30.00 31.42 65.00 72.51 48.00 34.95 27.29 1,049.37 4,012.00 4,012.00 2,640.00 3,060.00 5,700.00 VOUCHRE2 05/09/02 15:04 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 29097 05/09/02 004108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SER WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS/5/3/02 29098 05/09/02 000065 HERMOSA BEACH CAR WASH APRIL CAR WASHES APRIL CAR WASHES APRIL CAR WASHES APRIL CAR WASHES 29099 05/09/02 010820 JENKINS & HOGIN,LLP 29100 05/09/02 007556 TRAVIS JOHNSON 29101 05/09/02 011569 SUZANNE KASPEREK 29102 05/09/02 006293 KINKO'S INC. 29103 05/09/02 011571 STEVE KITSIOS 29104 05/09/02 008692 KIM KOMICK CONST 29105 05/09/02 011564 YULIA KORSOUNSKAYA LEGAL RE: LITIGATION/4/02 LEGAL RE: GENERAL/APRIL 02 LEGAL RE: ZONING ORD./4/02 LEGAL RE: ZONING ORD/4/02 LEGAL RE: LAND USE/4/02 LEGAL RE: TYCOM/4/02 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/OTL-2 CITATION REFUND COPIES/GENERAL PLAN SEWER LOACATION CARDS LAMINATING SIGNS PAPER FOAM DISPLAY/SCHUMACHER PLANS/VALLEY PARK PROGRAM COPIES/SCHUMACHER COPIES/ECONOMIC REVIEW REPORTS PLANS FOR VALLEY PARK CITATION REFUND WORK GUARANTEE REFUND #2499 CLASS REFUND 29106 05/09/02 000151 L.A. CO SHERIFF'S DEPAR PRISONER MAINT/3/02/02 29107 05/09/02 007136 THE LAKES AT EL SEGUNDO INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/BG-02 29108 05/09/02 000842 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CI CA MUNICIPAL LAW HANDBOOK 2002 29109 05/09/02 000167 LEARNED LUMBER 29110 05/09/02 29111 05/09/02 PLYWOOD/CABINET DOORS/PD LUMBER/CLARK FIELD FENCE 008445 LITTLE CO OF MARY HOSPI PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS/3/02 000077 LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVIC COPIES/ZONING MAP 29112 05/09/02 004138 KENNETH A. MEERSAND 29113 05/09/02 010668 MOBIL FLEET/GECC CITY PROSECUTOR/APRIL 2002 FUEL PURCHASES/APRIL 2002 FUEL PURCHASES/APRIL 2002 FUEL PURCHASES/APRIL 2002 ACCOUNT NUMBER 705-1217-4324 715-2101-4311 715-3302-4311 715-4202-4311 715-4201-4311 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-2114 - 001-4601-4221 110-3302 001-4101-4305 001-4202-4201 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4308 125-8507-4201 001-4601-4319 001-1101-4305 125-8507-4201 110-3302 001-2110 001-2111 001-2101-4251 001-4601-4221 001-1121-4317 153-2106-5602 001-6101-4309 001-1203-4320 001-4101-4305 001-1132-4201 715-2101-4310 715-2201-4310 715-4201-4310 ITEM AMOUNT 13,484.39 353.45 21.80 19.80 9.90 136.50 5,110.00 280.00 97.50 588.00 1,140.00 280.00 40.00 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 13,484.39 404.95 7,352.00 280.00 40.00 25.92 18.94 11.91 41.14 19.58 92.01 394.84 29.01 633.35 30.00 30.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 58.00 58.00 48.75 48.75 409.50 409.50 75.00 75.00 71.77 36.71 736.00 57.37 6,800.00 2,854.66 256.36 122.89 108.48 736.00 57.37 6,800.00 • • VOUCHRE2 05/09/02 15:04 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 29114 05/09/02 010479 ROBERT NOWLAND 29115 05/09/02 007750 BOB NUNN 29116 05/09/02 007158 PEEK TRAFFIC SIGNAL 29117 05/09/02 011568 JODY PERLMUTTER 29118 05/09/02 011566 RICKY POZOS 29119 05/09/02 007673 JAIME RAMIREZ 29120 05/09/02 011549 LINDA REED 29121 05/09/02 011077 FREDERIC W. ROBERTS,JR 29122 05/09/02 011552 CAROL SEVERANCE 29123 05/09/02 010087 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. 29124 05/09/02 000114 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL FUEL PURCHASES/APRIL 2002 PURCHASES/APRIL 2002 PURCHASES/APRIL 2002 PURCHASES/APRIL 2002 PURCHASES/APRIL 2002 PURCHASES/APRIL 2002 PURCHASES/APRIL 2002 PURCHASES/APRIL 2002 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/AK-01 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/YK-01 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/YK-02 INSTALL CEILING LIGHTS RENTAL SIGNAL CABINET/4/02 CITATION REFUND CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING PER DIEM/5/6-5/11/02 CLASS REFUND UMPIRE PAYMENT/SPRING 2002 CLASS REFUND TRUCK LOADER ANNUAL INSPECT. SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP PROGRAM SUPPLIES/SOUTH PARK SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPARTMENT PROGRAM SUPPLIES/DEDICATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES/APRIL 2002 29125 05/09/02 010532 SOUTH BAY FORD AUTO REPAIR/FEB 02 MEDICAL SUPPLIES/APRIL 2002 AUTO PARTS/MARCH 02 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 AUTO PARTS/APRIL 02 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 02 29126 05/09/02 008812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBL LABOR/REPAIR POLICE CAR 29127 05/09/02 000018 SOUTH BAY WELDERS WELDING TANKS FILLED WELDING TANKS FILLED 5 ACCOUNT NUMBER 715-4202-4310 715-6101-4310 715-3302-4310 715-3104-4310 715-4601-4310 715-2601-4310 715-3102-4310 001-1250 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4201-5602 001-3104-4201 110-3302 110-3302 001-2101-4317 001-2111 001-4601-4201 001-2111 715-3102-4201 001-4601-4308 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4308 715-2101-4311 001-2201-4309 715-2201-4311 715-2101-4311 715-3302-4311 715-2201-4311 715-2201-4311 715-2201-4311 715-2101-4311 001-2101-4309 715-2601-4311 715-2601-4311 ITEM AMOUNT 103.72 214.83 382.31 208.72 33.74 212.02 75.87 47.08 224.00 476.00 420.00 594.76 600.00 100.00 55.00 300.00 37.00 665.00 40.00 622.21 134.81 18.14 196.22 98.52 6.47 37.20 169.88 60.14 102.08 57.16 67.53 4.83 10.78 7.99 47.50 23.25 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 4,512.20 1,120.00 594.76 600.00 100.00 55.00 300.00 37.00 665.00 40.00 622.21 454.16 517.59 47.50 31.00 54.25 VOUCHRE2 05/09/02 15:04 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME • • 29128 05/09/02 000146 SPARKLETTS 29129 05/09/02 010463 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 29130 05/09/02 009153 TOSCO FLEET SERVICES 29131 05/09/02 008356 VIP KAWASAKI CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DRINKING WATER DISPENSER RENT ELEVATOR MAINT & REPAIRS MONTHLY CARD CHG/MAY 2002 MONTHLY CARD CHG/MAY 2002 MONTHLY CARD CHG/MAY 2002 MONTHLY CARD CHG/MAY 2002 MOTORCYCLE SERVICED/4/02 MOTORCYCLE REPAIRS/4/02 29132 05/09/02 011572 WARD & CREDELL REIMBURSE WITNESS FEES REIMBURSE WITNESS FEES TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2201-4305 109-3301-4201 715-3102-4310 715-2201-4310 715-2101-4310 715-4202-4310 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 ITEM AMOUNT 1.75 145.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 309.60 866.06 001-3815 - 150.00 001-3904 150.00 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 1.75 145.00 4.00 1,175.66 300.00 75,241.57 • • V0UCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 05/09/02 15:04 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 35,471.51 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 349.68 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 145.00 110 PARKING FUND 596.00 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 4,060.59 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 308.00 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 71.77 618 LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND 8,192.93 705 INSURANCE FUND 18,897.19 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 7,148.90 TOTAL 75,241.57 PAGE 7 VOUCHRE2 05/16/02 12:32 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 29133 05/16/02 011437 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIAL A TAXI SERVICE/APRIL 02 29134 05/16/02 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS ANTENNA PURCHASE/APRIL 02 EQUIP MAINT/MAY 02 EQUIP MAINT/MAY 02 29135 05/16/02 006827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL CRSSG GD SERV/4/21-5/4 29136 05/16/02 011589 AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCI CAMP STAFF TRAINING 29137 05/16/02 000152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE MAT SERVICE/04/02 MATS & SHOP TOWEL SERV/4/02 MAT SERVICE/MAR 02 SHOP TOWELS/4/02 MATS & SHOP TOWELS/4/02 MATS & SHOP TOWEL SERV/4/02 MAT SERVICE/APRIL 02 MAT SERVICE/4/02 SHOP TOWELS/4/02 MAT & SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/4/02 MATS & SHOP TOWELS/APRIL 02 MAT SERVICE/4/02 MAT SERVICE/4/02 MAT SERVICE/4/02 29138 05/16/02 009500 AT&T 29139 05/16/02 000163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 29140 05/16/02 010171 BUDGET BLINDS 29141 05/16/02 007109 ADAM BURT 29142 05/16/02 005935 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT 29143 05/16/02 006307 MARGARET CHASE 29144 05/16/02 000634 CHEVRON USA, INC. LONG DISTANCE SERVICES/MAY 02 PRISONER LAUNDRY/APRIL 02 PRISONER LAUNDRY/APRIL 02 PRISONER LAUNDRY/APRIL 02 PRISONER LAUNDRY/APRIL 02 MINI BLINDS/POLICE DEPT. MINI BLINDS/POLICE DEPARTMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/AT-05 UPPER PIER CLEANING/4/02 PIER HEAD CLEANING/4/02 DWNTWN AREA CLEANING/4/02 PIER CLEANING/4/02 STREET SPEEPING/APRIL 02 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/YS-02 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/YB-02 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/YB-03 GAS PURCHASE/MAY 02 29145 05/16/02 000153 CINTAS CORPORATION SHIRTS/MIKE FLAHERTY ACCOUNT NUMBER 145-3404-4201 110-3302-4307 110-3302-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2102-4201 001-4601-4315 001-4204-4309 001-2201-4309 001-2101-4309 715-4206-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2201-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 715-4206-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2201-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4306 - 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4601-4221 109-3301-4201 001-6101-4201 109-3301-4201 001-6101-4201 001-3104-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 715-2101-4310 001-4202-4187 ITEM AMOUNT 1,050.00 89.63 179.81 1,183.51 3,260.83 25.00 15.83 44.39 59.00 35.56 69.86 54.52 59.00 78.77 33.86 60.51 52.22 59.00 15.83 78.77 260.82 74.37 26.70 37.45 38.26 160.21 107.17 279.30 196.67 491.67 7,178.33 1,966.67 14,166.67 171.50 318.50 98.00 30.88 68.68 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 1,050.00 1,452.95 3,260.83 25.00 717.12. 260.82 176.78 267.38 279.30 24,000.01 588.00 30.88 68.68 VOUCHRE2 05/16/02 12:32 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME 29146 05/16/02 005970 DENNIS COLLINS 29147 05/16/02 011591 NICHOLE CONE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SV-03 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SV-04 CLASS REFUND 29148 05/16/02 011559 CONTINUING EDUCATION UN CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 29149 05/16/02 011582 ASHLEY CRAIG 29150 05/16/02 009461 CUSTOM TROPHY 29151 05/16/02 000642 THE DAILY BREEZE 29152 05/16/02 004689 DATA TICKET, INC. 29153 05/16/02 011400 DATALUX INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/OS-01 BLUE RIBBONS FOR DOG PARADE EMPLOYMENT AD/4/07/02 DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/APRIL 02 MOBILE DATA EQUIP MOBILE DATA EQUIP 29154 05/16/02 008453 DAVE'S MOBILE TURNOUT R TURNOUT REPAIR 29155 05/16/02 000154 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CA SHELTER SERVICE/APRIL 02 29156 05/16/02 008242 LYNDA DESLANDES 29157 05/16/02 000147 THE DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RG -03 FILM PROCESSING/APRIL 02 FILM PROCESSING/DAY CAMP FILM PROCESSING/5/02 29158 05/16/02 010909 DIVERSIFIED RISK INSURA DEPOSIT INSURANCE PREMIUM 29159 05/16/02 000181 EASY READER 29160 05/16/02 000165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO LEGAL ADS/4/04/02-05/02/02 P AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 2002 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN 29161 05/16/02 001397 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 29162 05/16/02 010297 EXECUTIVE CAR LEASING 29163 05/16/02 001294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICE UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMS/1/1-3/31 CITATION REFUND/0400044122 JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 02 JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 02 JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 02 JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 02 JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 02 9 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-2111 001-2101-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4308 001-1203-4201 110-1204-4201 154-2107-5402 154-2107-5402 001-2201-4187 110-3302-4251 001-4601-4221 001-2101-4305 001-4601-4308 001-2101-4305 705-1210-4201 001-1121-4323 715-3104-4311 715-4201-4311 715-4202-4311 715-2601-4311 715-2201-4311 715-2101-4311 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 705-1215-4186 110-3302 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 1,001.00 157.50 48.00 1,400.00 156.80 311.76 193.92 219.31 40,258.01 21,779.13 25.00 85.08 612.50 51.30 11.11 51.42 500.00 1,111.50 100.50 38.74 64.79 27.91 25.43 150.68 417.61 33.70 33.70- 282.00 30.00 750.00 1,200.00 950.00 290.00 365.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 1,158.50 48.00 1,400.00 156.80 311.76 193.92 219.31 62,037.14 25.00 85.08 612.50 113.83 500.00 1,111.50 825.66 282.00 30.00 VOUCHRE2 05/16/02 12:32 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME 29164 05/16/02 008625 EXPRESS OIL • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 02 JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 02 JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 02 JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 02 WASTE OIL REMOVAL/MAY 02 29165 05/16/02 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. EXPRESS MAIL/MAY 02 EXPRESS MAIL/MAY 02 EXPRESS MAIL/MAY 02 EXPRESS MAIL/MAY 02 29166 05/16/02 003169 STEVE FILLMAN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT CBVA-01 29167 05/16/02 007115 GILLIS & ASSOCIATES ARC ARCHITECT SERVICES/APRIL 02 29168 05/16/02 011584 GALINA GILMAN 29169 05/16/02 011483 ALEXANDER W. HAY III 29170 05/16/02 011592 WILL HIGGINS 29171 05/16/02 003432 HOME DEPOT/GECF WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SV-08 RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND/MAY 02 CEMENT PURCHASE/4/02 CIRCUIT FINDER HARDWARE SUPPLIES/4/02 VANITY/BASE 3 HARDWARE PURCHASE/4/02 SIGNS/HAZARD WASTE AREA ROOF PANELS & LUMBER PURCHASE PAINT PURCHASE/APRIL 02 PAINT PURCHASE/4/02 BUILDING SUPPLIES/4/02 RESTOCK PAINT & SUPPLIES/4/02 29172 05/16/02 011376 INTEGRATED MEDIA SYSTEM AUDIOVISUAL SYSTEM 29173 05/16/02 011577 NORMA JALOS CLASS REFUND 29174 05/16/02 011340 KATZ,OKITSU & ASSOCIATE TRAFFIC STUDY N.E. HERMOSA 29175 05/16/02 005358 KUSTOM SIGNALS 29176 05/16/02 000167 LEARNED LUMBER 29177 05/16/02 010045 MAIN STREET TOURS STEALTHSTAT RADAR PLYWOOD PURCHASE/MARCH 02 PLYWOOD PURCHASE/5/02 HINGE/2ND STREET RESTROOM EXCURSION DEPOSITS 29178 05/16/02 008457 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM COPIER USAGE/APRIL 02 COPIER USAGE/APRIL 02 COPIER USAGE/APRIL 02 10 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 715-4206-4201 160-8410-4201 001-4601-4302 001-4601-4308 160-8410-4201 001-4601-4221 001-8622-4201 001-2110 001-4601-4221 001-2111 001-3104-4309 105-2601-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4601-4308 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-6101-4309 001-3104-4309 001-8622-4201 001-2111 001-3104-4201 153-2106-5402 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-1550 001-1208-4201 001-4601-4201 001-1208-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 3,750.00 325.00 195.00 55.00 75.00 36.29 14.58 17.23 12.71 1,141.00 195.00 1,600.00 1,309.00 100.00 26.95 32.44 93.60 107.17 38.62 43.35 241.70 192.62 385.24 415.74 328.91 4,635.41 45.00 8,461.42 4,221.03 96.44 53.33 14.52 400.00 199.86 68.11 104.44 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 7,880.00 75.00 80.81- 1,141.00 195.00 1,600.00 1,309.00 100.00 1,906.34 4,635.41 45.00 8,461.42 4,221.03 164.29 400.00 VOUCHRE2 05/16/02 12:32 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION COPIER USAGE/APRIL 02 COPIER USAGE/APRIL 02 29179 05/16/02 011454 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAI DRINKING FOUNTAIN 29180 05/16/02 009854 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 29181 05/16/02 010098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 29182 05/16/02 004142 OFFICE DEPOT 29183 05/16/02 007158 PEEK TRAFFIC SIGNAL 29184 05/16/02 011585 TROY & JENNIFER PLISKA 29185 05/16/02 008482 PMX MEDICAL SPECIALTY 29186 05/16/02 011576 TERI RADFORD 29187 05/16/02 001429 RADIO SHACK 29188 05/16/02 008837 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH 29189 05/16/02 008867 SCAFO 29190 05/16/02 011583 HEATHER SCHECHNER 29191 05/16/02 007518 JULES SELTZER & ASSOC. 29192 05/16/02 009656 SHRED IT CALIFORNIA 29193 05/16/02 011586 GEORGE SHWEIRI CELL PHONE BILLING/4/2-5/1/02 CELL PHONE BILLING/4/2-5/1/02 CELL PHONE BILLING/4/2-5/1/02 CALCULATOR OFFICE SUPPLIES/APRIL 2002 SIGNAL MAINT/APRIL 02 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND/3040 MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN REFUND BUILDING REPORT CELL PHONE BATTERIES FUEL PURCHASE/3/24-4/22/02 FUEL PURCHASE/3/24-4/22/02 FUEL PURCHASE/3/24-4/22/02 FUEL PURCHASE/3/24-4/22/02 FUEL PURCHASE/3/24-4/22/02 TUITION/TEREA JOHNSON INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/OB-01 FURNITURE/POLICE DEPARTMENT DESTRUCTION SERVICES/APRIL 02 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND/3078 29194 05/16/02 011435 SOUND PACIFIC INC. PROD SOUND SYSTEM PURCHASE 29195 05/16/02 010532 SOUTH BAY FORD AUTO PART PURCHASE/FEB 02 AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAR 02 AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAR 02 RETURNED MERCHANDISE/MAR 02 11 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2201-4201 110-3302-4201 001-6101-4309 001-4601-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-4204-4309 001-2201-4305 001-3104-4201 001-2110 001-2201-4309 001-2201-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-2201-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-3801 001-2101-4305 715-2201-4310 715-2101-4310 715-3102-4310 715-4204-4310 715-1202-4310 001-2101-4317 001-4601-4221 153-2106-5402 001-2101-4201 001-2110 001-4601-5401 715-4601-4311 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 ITEM AMOUNT 68.11 13.61 2,645.68 526.88 973.53 47.99 10.81 96.33 223.55 1,600.00 169.88 33.42 .27 .27- 332.86 3.04 3.04- 39.20 86.58 347.49 5.22 59.96 1.04 5.36 80.00 134.40 13,495.76 85.00 1,600.00 481.00 14.86 188.12 213.69 184.08 - PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 454.13 2,645.68 526.88 1,021.52 107.14 223.55 1,600.00 536.16 39.20 86.58 419.07 80.00 134.40 13,495.76 85.00 1,600.00 481.00 VOUCHRE2 05/16/02 12:32 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME • • 29196 05/16/02 011471 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION AUTO PARTS/MAR 02 AUTO PARTS/APRIL 02 AUTO PARTS/APRIL 02 AUTO PARTS/APRIL 02 AUTO PARTS/APRIL 02 AUTO PARTS/APRIL 02 AUTO PARTS/APRIL 02 AUTO PARTS/MARCH 02 CUSTOM MANHOLE FRAME & COVER 29197 05/16/02 000118 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COU CITATION SURCHARGE/MARCH 2002 29198 05/16/02 011317 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA YOU INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/HBY-01 29199 05/16/02 009532 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 29200 05/16/02 011486 TERRY'S MOBILE CANVAS 29201 05/16/02 000124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 29202 05/16/02 011476 TORRANCE FIRE DEPARTMEN 29203 05/16/02 009878 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE 29204 05/16/02 000443 TRANSCONTINENTAL SALES 29205 05/16/02 000123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE 29206 05/16/02 000015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA HIGH BACK SWIVEL CHAIR HELMET I.D. SHIELDS DRINKING FOUNTAIN/22ND STREET DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN BALANCE DUE FOR MEMBERSHIP REPLACEMENT POST/CITY YARD NOMEX BRUSH JACKETS & PANTS HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 02 HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 02 HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 02 HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 02 HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 02 HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 02 HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 02 HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 02 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN PHONE BILLING/04/10-05/10/02 29207 05/16/02 008646 WIDMANN DEVELOPMENT INC WORK GUARANTEE REFUND/#2636 29208 05/16/02 007106 JENNIFER YAMANE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/BT-05 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/BT-06 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/BT-07 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/BT-08 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/DT-02 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/BJ-04 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/BJ-05 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/BJ-06 TOTAL CHECKS lg ACCOUNT NUMBER 715-2201-4311 715-2101-4311 715-3302-4311 715-2201-4311 715-2201-4311 715-2201-4311 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 160-3102-4309 110-3302 001-4601-4221 001-4601-5401 180-2202-5402 001-4204-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-2201-4315 001-3104-4309 180-2202-5402 153-2106-5602 001-6101-4309 715-3104-4311 001-2201-4309 715-4201-4311 160-3102-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4204-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-4601-4304 001-2110 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 PAGE 5 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 60.14 102.08 57.16 67.53 4.82 10.78 7.99 37.20 580.29 829.20 829.20 17,331.00 17,331.00 1,234.34 1,234.34 630.61 630.61 636.51 636.51 314.22 6.41 6.41- 314.22 50.00 50.00 941.78 941.78 442.53 442.53. 36.00 114.56 26.31 156.19 7.78 233.45 133.95 389.68 121.99 121.99- 1,097.92 90.59 90.59 1,600.00 1,600.00 252.00 189.00 252.00 94.50 315.00 126.00 283.50 94.50 1,606.50 184,424.61 • VOUCHRE2 05/16/02 12:32 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 110 PARKING FUND 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 154 CA LAW ENF EQUIP PROG (CLEEP) 160 SEWER FUND 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 705 INSURANCE FUND 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND TOTAL 73,221.70 32.44 7,375.00 17,948.44 1,050.00 17,752.79 62,037.14 1,111.65 1,079.04 782.00 2,034.41 184,424.61 PAGE 6 VOUCHRE2 05/20/02 09:45 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 29209 05/20/02 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 001-1103 285,027.61 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 105-1103 6,035.93 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 109-1103 925.32 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 110-1103 30,039.39 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 117-1103 634.93 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 140-1103 1,046.59 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 145-1103 1,140.31 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 146-1103 1,560.99 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 150-1103 53.11 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 152-1103 44.38 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 160-1103 7,870.35 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 301-1103 600.79 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 705-1103 - 2,596.23 PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-02 715-1103 5,112.29 342,688.22 TOTAL CHECKS 342,688.22 ILl • • VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 05/20/02 09:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 110 PARKING FUND 117 AB939 FUND 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 150 GRANTS FUND 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 160 SEWER FUND 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 705 INSURANCE FUND 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND TOTAL 285,027.61 6,035.93 925.32 30,039.39 634.93 1,046.59 1,140.31 1,560.99 53.11 44.38 7,870.35 600.79 2,596.23 5,112.29 342,688.22 15 PAGE 2 • • VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 05/20/02 09:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES TO _ INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE PAGE 3 • • May 21, 2002 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council May 28, 2002 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the checks listed below: #29077 — 5/09/02 — Braun Linen Service - $374.08. Acct. # 001-2101-4306 $176.78 Acct. # 001-4204-4309 $17.32 The check was made payable for the wrong amount. The check was not mailed. #28921— 4/25/02 — South Bay Ford - $517.59. Concur: Acct. # 715-2101-4311 $147.27 Acct. # 715-2201-4311 $57.16 The check was made payable for the wrong amount. The check was not mailed. Ste l'en R. Burrell, City Manager Joh orkman, City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director • May 23, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 28, 2002 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS JUN . �� 2002 TyCom Transpacific Fiber Optic Cable Project — Planned Dev. Permit & PDP amendment to utilize a Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) method of installation for the beach segment of the project in lieu of the Direct Burial method. Community Development Director Public Hearing: Adoption of 2002-03 Budget Finance Director JUNE 25 2002 Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of June 18, 2002 Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of June 4, 2002 Community Resources Director May Activity Reports All Departments ......::....MONDAY: JULY.8.. 2002. 7W0PJ1....:.: . REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT ...... JULY.9.::20az..::..... : Text Amendment for non -required off-site parking in M-1 zone. Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of June 19, 2002. Public Works Director JULY 23 2002 < Public Hearing: 1100 The Strand, Scotty's — Appeal of P.C. denial of a CUP amendment to allow on -sale general alcohol; amplified live entertainment; a take- out food service window, & 24-hour operation in conjunction with an existing restaurant and to add bar seating in the patio area & Neg. Dec (Continued from meeting of May 28, 2002) Community Development Director Expenditure of 10% of LA County CDBG funds for the general administration of projects funded through the CDBG program. Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of July 2, 2002 Community Resources Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of July 16, 2002 Community Development Director June Activity Reports All Departments 2c May 21, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 28, 2002 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS APRIL 2002 Attached are the April 2002 Revenue and Expenditure reports. General Fund revenue is 83.7% received for 83.3% of the fiscal year. Parking Fund revenue is 84.2 % received. General Fund expenditures are 78.4% expended and Parking Fund expenditures are 79.9% expended for 83.3% of the fiscal year. Respectfully submitted, Viki Copeland Finance Director NOTED: Ste City Manager 2d(1) h:\b95\open\revexp.doc ;r REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 1 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 4,243,167.00 1,309,650.31 3,709,841.05 533,325.95 87.4 3102 CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED 317,549.00 .00 277,815.77 39,733.23 87.5 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 146,517.00 360.62 136,499.90 10,017.10 93.2 3106 SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL SB813 70,000.00 11,618.93 92,024.81 22,024.81- 131.5 3107 TRANSFER TAX 155,000.00 17,555.97 137,817.66 17,182.34 88.9 3108 SALES TAX 2,764,735.00 165,600.00 2,089,765.03 674,969.97 75.6 3109 1/2 CENT SALES TX EXT 156,968.00 10,659.92 97,826.11 59,141.89 62.3 3110 CABLE TV FRANCHISE 200,000.00 .00 103,764.47 96,235.53 51.9 3111 ELECTRIC FRANCHISE 53,883.00 56,795.73 56,795.73 2,912.73- 105.4 3112 GAS FRANCHISE 55,000.00 59,749.91 59,749.91 4,749.91- 108.6 3113 REFUSE FRANCHISE 151,439.00 9,466.15 110,038.48 41,400.52 72.7 3114 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY 892,582.00 167,815.90 893,355.44 773.44- 100.1 3115 BUSINESS LICENSE 630,000.00 47,366.71 514,068.75 115,931.25 81.6 3120 UTILITY USER TAX 2,050,818.00 174,129.68 1,701,024.80 349,793.20 82.9 TAXES 11,887,658.00 2,030,769.83 9,980,387.91 1,907,270.09 84.0 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS 3202 DOG LICENSES 10,500.00 225.50 9,336.75 1,163.25 88.9 3203 BICYCLE LICENSES 50.00 .00 28.00 22.00 56.0 3204 BUILDING PERMITS 243,100.00 32,007.33 199,369.91 43,730.09 82.0 3205 ELECTRIC PERMITS 56,000.00 3,442.00 43,079.60 12,920.40 76.9 3206 PLUMBING PERMITS 40,250.00 2,349.00 27,085.40 13,164.60 67.3 3207 OCCUPANCY PERMITS 8,000.00 833.00 6,839.00 1,161.00 85.5 3209 GARAGE SALES 100.00 12.00 45.00 55.00 45.0 3211 BANNER PERMITS 3,000.00 458.00 4,082.00 1,082.00- 136.1 3212 ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS 150.00 .00 .00 150.00 0.0 3213 ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 2,000.00 275.00 2,298.00 298.00- 114.9 3214 AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT 600.00 .00 770.00 170.00- 128.3 3215 TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT 882.00 .00 512.00 370.00 58.0 3216 SPRAY BOOTH PERMIT 125.00 .00 .00 125.00 0.0 3217 OPEN FIRE PERMIT 100.00 .00 53.00 47.00 53.0 3218 AUTO REPAIR PERMIT 2,514.00 .00 2,514.00 .00 100.0 3225 TAXICAB PERMITS 60,000.00 .00 66,894.00 6,894.00- 111.5 LICENSES AND PERMITS 427,371.00 39,601.83 362,906.66 64,464.34 84.9 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3301 MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 190,000.00 16,919.67 164,982.79 25,017.21 86.8 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 192,405.00 23,586.00 130,042.70 62,362.30 67.6 3402 RENTS & CONCESSIONS 1,000.00 .00 328.47 671.53 32.8 3403 PIER REVENUE 1,000.00 199.25 1,016.25 16.25- 101.6 3404 COMM CTR LEASES 64,498.00 5,085.00 54,617.42 9,880.58 84.7 3405 COMM CTR RENTALS 55,000.00 4,918.50 31,127.00 23,873.00 56.6 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) • PAGE 2 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3406 COMM CTR THEATRE 30,000.00 6,122.50 36,218.00 6,218.00- 120.7 3411 OTHER FACILITIES 20,000.00 2,089.25 11,366.00 8,634.00 56.8 3412 TENNIS COURTS 12,000.00 1,410.00 13,544.25 1,544.25- 112.9 3418 SPECIAL EVENTS 50,000.00 1,613.00 22,213.00 27,787.00 44.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 3,154.00 109.35 2,457.08 696.92 77.9 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 1,373.00- 227.53- 1,268.90- 104.10- 92.4 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 427,684.00 44,905.32 301,661.27 126,022.73 70.5 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3504 IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 384.00 .00 444.30 60.30- 115.7 3505 IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 1,041,197.00 89,560.35 866,942.31 174,254.69 83.3 3507 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 7,774.00 .00 .00 7,774.00 0.0 3508 MANDATED COSTS 63,000.00 5,333.00 34,944.20 28,055.80 55.5 3509 HOMEOWNR PROP TX RELIEF 66,375.00 .00 33,922.85 32,452.15 51.1 3510 POST 10,000.00 307.30 3,944.18 6,055.82 39.4 3511 STC -SVC OFFICER TRAINING 4,500.00 .00 4,701.95 201.95- 104.5 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 1,193,230.00 95,200.65 944,899.79 248,330.21 79.2 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3801 RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 14,100.00 2,352.00 15,689.00 1,589.00- 111.3 3802 SIGN REVIEW 1,920.00 200.00 1,492.00 428.00 77.7 3803 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 719.00 .00 1,451.00 732.00- 201.8 3805 CONDTL USE PERMIT AMEND 1,149.00 .00 1,985.00 836.00- 172.8 3808 ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW 3,318.00 .00 2,294.00 1,024.00 69.1 3809 TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW 3,385.00 .00 3,385.00 .00 100.0 3810 FINAL MAP REVIEW 5,380.00 279.00 3,876.00 1,504.00 72.0 3811 ZONE CHANGE/GEN PLAN AMEND 1,489.00 .00 .00 1,489.00 0.0 3812 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 19,138.00 1,488.00 10,335.00 8,803.00 54.0 3813 PLAN CHECK FEES 194,480.00 25,161.80 126,086.10 68,393.90 64.8 3814 PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL 400.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 50.0 3815 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 18,000.00 700.00 11,886.00 6,114.00 66.0 3818 POLICE SERVICES 3,000.00 190.00- 1,895.00 1,105.00 63.2 3819 JAIL SERVICES 27,000.00 3,744.00 27,389.00 389.00- 101.4 3823 SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY 35,000.00 690.00 A 9,816.00 25,.184.00 2$.0 3825 PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 34.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 50.0 3827 LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 8,084.00 .00 8,084.00 .00 100.0 3831 STREET CUT INSPECTION 46,000.00 1,620.00 38,618.00 7,382.00 84.0 3833 RECREATION SERVICE CHARGES 5,500.00 631.75 6,274.53 774.53- 114.1 3834 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 110,674.00 6,175.50 100,929.90 9,744.10 91.2 3837 RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 550.00 140.00 880.00 330.00- 160.0 3838 SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIONS 232.00 20.00 277.74 45.74- 119.7 3839 PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 800.00 26.30 442.10 357.90 55.3 3840 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 120,000.00 13,152.80 125,257.59 5,257.59- 104.4 3841 POLICE TOWING 30,000.00 2,524.00 28,244.00 1,756.00 94.1 3857 PKG PLAN APPLICATION 3,303.00 .00 3,426.00 123.00- 103.7 3858 TENANT REFUSE BILLING 120.00 99.00 242.00 122.00- 201.7 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 3 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3859 REFUSE LIEN FEE 803.00 7,054.95 17,584.87 16,781.87- 999.9+ 3862 ALARM PERMIT FEE 1,000.00 139.00 730.50 269.50 73.1 3863 FALSE ALARM FEE 600.00 .00 .00 600.00 0.0 3866 NONCONFORMING REMODELS 6,626.00 832.00 9,122.00 2,496.00- 137.7 3867 PRECISE DEVLMNT PLANS 28,770.00 .00 14,108.00 14,662.00 49.0 3868 PUBLIC NOTICING/300 FT 25,360.00 1,268.00 15,850.00 9,510.00 62.5 3869 2ND PARTY RESPONSE 100.00 .00 .00 100.00 0.0 3870 LEGAL DETERMINATION HEARING 1,194.00 .00 .00 1,194.00 0.0 3875 SPRAY BOOTH INSP (ANNUAL) 359.00 .00 .00 359.00 0.0 3878 REINSPECTION FEE 1,680.00 .00 1,890.00 210.00- 112.5 3881 ROLLR HOCKEY RINK RENT INS 265.00 .00 120.00- 385.00 45.3- 3882 SPEC EVENT SECURITY/FIRE 1,790.00 138.00 749.00 1,041.00 41.8 3883 FINAL/TENT MAP EXTNSION 807.00 .00 837.00 30.00- 103.7 3884 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 616.00 .00 .00 616.00 0.0 3886 TEXT AMENDMENT PRIVATE 552.00 .00 .00 552.00 0.0 3887 VOLUNTARY LOT MERGER 396.00 198.00 198.00 198.00 50.0 3888 PLANNING COMM APPEALS 4,740.00. .00 1,640.00 3,100.00 34.6 3890 300'RADIUS NOTCG/APL CC 1,150.00 230.00 744.00 406.00 64.7 3893 CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 225,000.00 18,568.16 222,062.00 2,938.00 98.7 3894 OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS 45,000.00 1,405.00 49,983.22 4,983.22- 111.1 3896 MAILING FEE .00 .00 6.68 6.68- *** 3897 ADMIN FEE, INS CERTIF 495.00 420.38 622.05 127.05- 125.7 3899 C.U.P. MINOR AMEND. 115.00 .00 230.00 115.00- 200.0 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 1,001,193.00 89,284.64 866,709.28 134,483.72 86.6 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 1,000.00 .00 9.30 990.70 0.9 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 8,470.00 3,175.21- 57,391.83 48,921.83- 677.6 3903 CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 51,204.00 900.00 53,453.70 2,249.70- 104.4 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 7,816.00 2,063.95 11,558.81 3,742.81- 147.9 3909 LATE FEE .00 .37 73.63 73.63- *** 3920 BCHD HEALTHY CITIES FUND 50,550.00 19,439.14 37,938.76 12,611.24 75.1 3935 USE OF PERS EXCESS ASSETS 310,988.00 24,867.76 243,244.58 67,743.42 78.2 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1,167,123.00 96,784.00 975,025.85 192,097.15 83.5 OTHER REVENUE 1,597,151.00 140,880.01 1,378,696.46 218,454.54 86.3 REVENUE CONTROL 16,724,287.00 2,457,561.95 14,000,244.16 2,724,042.84 83.7 GENERAL FUND 16,724,287.00 2,457,561.95 14,000,244.16 2,724,042.84 83.7 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 4 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 446,192.00 105,658.10 384,562.39 61,629.61 86.2 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 9,000.00 .00 10,406.66 1,406.66- 115.6 3105 ASSESSMENT REBATES 4,000.00- 516.81- 1,993.41- 2,006.59- 49.8 TAXES 451,192.00 105,141.29 392,975.64 58,216.36 87.1 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 13,183.00 2,281.04 10,028.11 3,154.89 76.1 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 217.00 9.18 179.00 38.00 82.5 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 95.00- 19.11- 95.39- .39 100.4 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 13,305.00 2,271.11 10,111.72 3,193.28 76.0 REVENUE CONTROL 464,497.00 107,412.40 403,087.36 61,409.64 86.8 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 464,497.00 107,412.40 403,087.36 61,409.64 86.8 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL , 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 5 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 35,589.00 5,111.08 25,612.91 9,976.09 72.0 3420 OTHER INTEREST INCOME 16,903.00 1,363.50 14,143.69 2,759.31 83.7 3425 GROUND LEASE 21,000.00 1,750.00 17,500.00 3,500.00 83.3 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 585.00 18.60 442.72 142.28 75.7 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 255.00- 38.71- 227.63- 27.37- 89.3 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 73,822.00 8,204.47 57,471.69 16,350.31 77.9 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3815 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 6,000.00 .00 500.00 5,500.00 8.3 3844 LOT A REVENUE 266,764.00 22,561.00 175,601.00 91,163.00 65.8 3846 NO PIER PKG STRUCTURE REVENUE 551,338.00 44,747.75 378,186.25 173,151.75 68.6 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 824,102.00 67,308.75 554,287.25 269,814.75 67.3 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS .00 .00 1.00 1.00- *** 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 287.00 .00 286.11 .89 99.7 OTHER REVENUE 287.00 .00 287.11 .11- 100.0 REVENUE CONTROL 898,211.00 75,513.22 612,046.05 286,164.95 68.1 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 898,211.00 75,513.22 612,046.05 286,164.95 68.1 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 110 PARKING FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3300 3302 FINES & FORFEITURES COURT FINES/PARKING 1,009,474.00 89,650.59 PAGE 6 BALANCE % COL 840,696.71 168,777.29 83.3 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 2,794.00 2,145.52 4,279.25 1,485.25- 153.2 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 75.00 8.92 77.99 • 2.99- 104.0 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 32.00- 18.55- 50.65- 18.65 158.3 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,837.00 2,135.89 4,306.59 1,469.59- 151.8 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3842 PARKING METERS 955,000.00 92,886.25 783,022.19 171,977.81 82.0 3843 PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL 275,000.00 19,607.00 259,291.00 15,709.00 94.3 3844 DAILY PARKING PERMITS 742.00 6.00 595.70 146.30 80.3 3848 DRIVEWAY PERMITS 500.00 68.00 360.00 140.00 72.0 3849 GUEST PERMITS 1,400.00 73.00 1,160.00 240.00 82.9 3850 CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS 6,000.00 728.00 6,110.00 110.00- 101.8 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 1,238,642.00 113,368.25 1,050,538.89 188,103.11 84.8 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 69.00 .00 69.00 .00 100.0 REVENUE CONTROL 2,251,022.00 205,154.73 1,895,611.19 355,410.81 84.2 PARKING FUND 2,251,022.00 205,154.73 1,895,611.19 355,410.81 84.2 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND ! • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 7 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 9,580.00 446.48 6,113.96 3,466.04 63.8 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 160.00 2.43 123.99 36.01 77.5 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 70.00- 5.05- 59.59- 10.41- 85.1 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 9,670.00 443.86 6,178.36 3,491.64 63.9 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3501 SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 72,203.00 11,340.08 61,180.70 11,022.30 84.7 3502 SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 153,559.00 22,954.88 127,852.28 25,706.72 83.3 3503 SECT 2107.5 ALLOCATION 4,000.00 .00 4,000.00 .00 100.0 3512 SECTION 2105 (PROP 111) 116,937.00 18,194.02 97,520.13 19,416.87 83.4 3552 AB2928/TRAFF CONGESTION RELIEF 55,551.00 14,742.20 42,997.33 12,553.67 77.4 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 402,250.00 67,231.18 333,550.44 68,699.56 82.9 REVENUE CONTROL 411,920.00 67,675.04 339,728.80 72,191.20 82.5 STATE GAS TAX FUND 411,920.00 67,675.04 339,728.80 72,191.20 82.5 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 117 AB939 FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 8 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 16,277.00 3,160.90 12,903.11 3,373.89 79.3 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 265.00 11.27 211.93 53.07 80.0 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 115.00- 23.46- 114.02- .98- 99.1 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 16,427.00 3,148.71 13,001.02 3,425.98 79.1 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3860 AB939 SURCHARGE 51,546.00 5,329.09 55,188.01 3,642.01- 107.1 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB-PREVIOUS YEARS 870.00 .00 870.18 .18- 100.0 REVENUE CONTROL 68,843.00 8,477.80 69,059.21 216.21- 100.3 AB939 FUND 68,843.00 8,477.80 69,059.21 216.21- 100.3 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 9 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 2,095.00 15.03 1,204.63 890.37 57.5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 34.00 .14 23.94 10.06 70.4 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 15.00- .30- 10.76- 4.24- 71.7 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,114.00 14.87 1,217.81 896.19 57.6 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3601 COUNTY AID TO CITIES 28,720.00 .00 28,720.00 .00 100.0 REVENUE CONTROL 30,834.00 14.87 29,937.81 896.19 97.1 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 30,834.00 14.87 29,937.81 896.19 97.1 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 10 BALANCE % COL 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3608 MAINTENANCE ALLOCATION 19,097.00 .00 .00 19,097.00 0.0 REVENUE CONTROL 19,097.00 .00 .00 19,097.00 0.0 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 19,097.00 .00 .00 19,097.00 0.0 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3116 PARK REC FACILITY TAX PAGE 11 BALANCE % COL 3,500.00 3,500.00 7,000.00 3,500.00- 200.0 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 39,464.00 5,869.73 28,790.43 10,673.57 73.0 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 642.00 21.02 488.02 153.98 76.0 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 280.00- 43.74- 251.78- 28.22- 89.9 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 39,826.00 5,847.01 29,026.67 10,799.33 72.9 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3910 PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU 68,544.00 13,792.00 66,950.00 1,594.00 97.7 REVENUE CONTROL PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 111,870.00 23,139.01 102,976.67 8,893.33 92.1 111,870.00 23,139.01 102,976.67 8,893.33 92.1 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 12 BALANCE Y COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 15,811.00 2,728.79 12,030.77 3,780.23 76.1 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 260.00 9.71 202.93 57.07 78.1 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 113.00- 20.21- 106.88- 6.12- 94.6 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 15,958.00 2,718.29 12,126.82 3,831.18 76.0 REVENUE CONTROL 15,958.00 2,718.29 12,126.82 3,831.18 76.0 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 15,958.00 2,718.29 12,126.82 3,831.18 76.0 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 13 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 6,716.00 135.24 3,607.97 3,108.03 53.7 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 122.00 .47 72.05 49.95 59.1 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 53.00- .99- 31.37- 21.63- 59.2 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 6,785.00 134.72 3,648.65 3,136.35 53.8 REVENUE CONTROL 6,785.00 134.72 3,648.65 3,136.35 53.8 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 6,785.00 134.72 3,648.65 3,136.35 53.8 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 136 LOWER PIER ADMIN EXP FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3900 3925 OTHER REVENUE SPEC ASSESSMENT ADMIN FEES REVENUE CONTROL LOWER PIER ADMIN EXP FUND PAGE 14 BALANCE % COL 2,631.00 .00 2,737.70 106.70- 104.1 2,631.00 .00 2,737.70 106.70- 104.1 2,631.00 .00 2,737.70 106.70- 104.1 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 137 MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3925 SPEC ASSESSMENT ADMIN FEES REVENUE CONTROL MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND 292.00 66.92 PAGE 15 BALANCE % COL 254.08 37.92 87.0 8,544.00 .00 8,544.32 .32- 100.0 8,836.00 66.92 8,798.40 37.60 99.6 8,836.00 66.92 8,798.40 37.60 99.6 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 138 LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3X OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES '3826 APPLICATION FOR APPORTIONMENT 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3925 SPEC ASSESSMENT ADMIN FEES REVENUE CONTROL LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND PAGE 16 BALANCE % COL 394.00 81.18 332.18 61.82 84.3 1,500.00 .00 750.00 750.00 50.0 9,188.00 .00 9,394.19 206.19- 102.2 11,082.00 81.18 10,476.37 605.63 94.5 11,082.00 81.18 10,476.37 605.63 94.5 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 17 BALANCE % COL 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3715 CDBG ADMINISTRATION 14,406.00 .00 .00 14,406.00 0.0 3720 AMER DISAB ACT 573,796.00 .00 1,486.00 572,310.00 0.3 3721 UTILITY UNDERGROUND ASSISTANCE 9,000.00 .00 2,855.00 6,145.00 31.7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 597,202.00 .00 4,341.00 592,861.00 0.7 REVENUE CONTROL 597,202.00 .00 4,341.00 592,861.00 0.7 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 597,202.00 .00 4,341.00 592,861.00 0.7 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 18 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3117 PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 246,670.00 12,907.30 201,733.58 44,936.42 81.8 3121 SUBREGIONAL INCENTIVES 33,750.00 .00 6,932.76 26,817.24 20.5 TAXES 280,420.00 12,907.30 208,666.34 71,753.66 74.4 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 9,242.00 1,701.87 7,297.23 1,944.77 79.0 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 139.00 6.12 114.03 24.97 82.0 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 61.00- 12.73- 61.44- .44 100.7 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 9,320.00 1,695.26 7,349.82 1,970.18 78.9 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3853 DIAL -A -TAXI PROGRAM 200.00 160.00 350.00 150.00- 175.0 3854 FARES, DIAL A RIDE 11,050.00 .00 5,391.06 5,658.94 48.8 3855 BUS PASSES 600.00 27.20 508.80 91.20 84.8 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 11,850.00 187.20 6,249.86 5,600.14 52.7 REVENUE CONTROL 301,590.00 14,789.76 222,266.02 79,323.98 73.7 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 301,590.00 14,789.76 222,266.02 79,323.98 73.7 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3118 PROP C LOCAL RETURN FDS PAGE 19 BALANCE % COL 204,690.00 .00 152,028.95 52,661.05 74.3 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 36,974.00 5,073.93 26,001.49 10,972.51 70.3 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 634.00 17.74 451.74 182.26 71.3 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 276.00- 36.91- 227.63- 48.37- 82.5 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 37,332.00 5,054.76 26,225.60 11,106.40 70.2 REVENUE CONTROL 242,022.00 5,054.76 178,254.55 63,767.45 73.7 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 242,022.00 5,054.76 178,254.55 63,767.45 73.7 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 150 GRANTS FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 20 BALANCE % COL 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3546 COASTAL AUTHORITY GRANT 4,470.00 .00 .00 4,470.00 0.0 3555 GR19-080/COMM CTR RENOVATION 246,250.00 .00 .00 246,250.00 0.0 3557 STATE TRANSP IMPROV PROGRAM 110,000.00 .00 75,842.05 34,157.95 68.9 3558 BEVERAGE RECYCLING GRANT 5,646.00 .00 5,646.00 .00 100.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 366,366.00 .00 81,488.05 284,877.95 22.2 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3732 STPL ST IMPROVEMENT REIMB 327,316.00 91,435.98 91,435.98 235,880.02 27.9 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB-PREVIOUS YEARS .00 .00 1,995.00- 1,995.00 *** 3930 BCHD DOM VIOLENCE ADV GRANT 15,000.00 250.58 1,548.33 13,451.67 10.3 OTHER REVENUE 15,000.00 250.58 446.67- 15,446.67 3.0 - REVENUE CONTROL 708,682.00 91,686.56 172,477.36 536,204.64 24.3 GRANTS FUND 708,682.00 91,686.56 172,477.36 536,204.64 24.3 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 21 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 1,247.00 302.49 1,070.20 176.80 85.8 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 19.00 1.05 16.21 2.79 85.3 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 8.00- 2.19- 9.13- 1.13 114.1 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 1,258.00 301.35 1,077.28 180.72 85.6 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3538 AOMD EMISSION CONTROL AB2766 20,700.00 .00 10,448.46 10,251.54 50.5 REVENUE CONTROL AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 21,958.00 301.35 11,525.74 10,432.26 52.5 21,958.00 301.35 11,525.74 10,432.26 52.5 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 3135 TAXES C.O.P.S. ALLOCATION PAGE 22 BALANCE % COL 100,000.00 .00 100,000.00 .00 100.0 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 6,604.00 1,134.33 5,119.96 1,484.04 77.5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 100.00 4.01 80.96 19.04 81.0 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 44.00- 8.36- 43.13- .87- 98.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 6,660.00 1,129.98 5,157.79 1,502.21 77.4 REVENUE CONTROL 106,660.00 1,129.98 105,157.79 1,502.21 98.6 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 106,660.00 1,129.98 105,157.79 1,502.21 98.6 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 154 CA LAW ENF EQUIP PROG (CLEEP) • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 23 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 6,245.00 1,172.50 4,901.03 1,343.97 78.5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 99.00 3.79 81.31 17.69 82.1 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 43.00- 7.88- 43.00- .00 100.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 6,301.00 1,168.41 4,939.34 1,361.66 78.4 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3540 CLEEP HIGH TECHNOLOGY GRANT REVENUE CONTROL CA LAW ENF EQUIP PROG (CLEEP) 35,825.00 .00 35,825.00 .00 100.0 42,126.00 1,168.41 40,764.34 1,361.66 96.8 42,126.00 1,168.41 40,764.34 1,361.66 96.8 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 160 SEWER FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 24 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 165,898.00 30,149.40 127,797.05 38,100.95 77.0 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 2,710.00 106.75 2,133.34 576.66 78.7 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 1,182.00- 222.15- 1,133.70- 48.30- 95.9 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 167,426.00 30,034.00 128,796.69 38,629.31 76.9 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3550 CA WASTE OIL RECYCLING GRANT 5,797.00 .00 5,226.10 570.90 90.2 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3602 BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANCE 2,000.00 .00 158.00 1,842.00 7.9 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3828 SEWER CONNECTION FEE 4,550.00 1,586.56 5,145.21 595.21- 113.1 3829 SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 6,000.00 372.00 4,436.00 1,564.00 73.9 3832 SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 7,000.00 186.00 5,710.00 1,290.00 81.6 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 17,550.00 2,144.56 15,291.21 2,258.79 87.1 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3917 ADOPT -A -STORM DRAIN DONATION 60,000.00 .00 4,000.00 56,000.00 6.7 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 700,044.00 58,333.00 583,374.00 116,670.00 83.3 OTHER REVENUE 760,044.00 58,333.00 587,374.00 172,670.00 77.3 REVENUE CONTROL 952,817.00 90,511.56 736,846.00 215,971.00 77.3 SEWER FUND 952,817.00 90,511.56 736,846.00 215,971.00 77.3 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 25 BALANCE % COL 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3304 STATE FORFEITED FUNDS 10,000.00 .00 3,715.91 6,284.09 37.2 3307 DEPT OF JUSTICE FORFEITED FNDS 1,283.00 .00 7,006.80 5,723.80- 546.1 3308 DEPT OF TREAS FORFEITED FUNDS 200.00 .00 1,294.15 1,094.15- 647.1 FINES & FORFEITURES 11,483.00 .00 12,016.86 533.86- 104.6 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 7,444.00 1,399.53 5,837.98 1,606.02 78.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 120.00 4.96 96.24 23.76 80.2 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 52.00- 10.33- 51.50- .50- 99.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 7,512.00 1,394.16 5,882.72 1,629.28 78.3 REVENUE CONTROL 18,995.00 1,394.16 17,899.58 1,095.42 94.2 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 18,995.00 1,394.16 17,899.58 1,095.42 94.2 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND • . • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 26 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 24,772.00 3,980.66 18,517.22 6,254.78 74.8 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 409.00 14.09 315.05 93.95 77.0 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 178.00- 29.32- 164.00- 14.00- 92.1 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 25,003.00 3,965.43 18,668.27 6,334.73 74.7 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3912 FIRE FLOW FEE 61,088.00 11,669.00 51,699.00 9,389.00 84.6 REVENUE CONTROL 86,091.00 15,634.43 70,367.27 15,723.73 81.7 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 86,091.00 15,634.43 70,367.27 15,723.73 81.7 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 199 CONTINGENCY FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 27 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME .00 15,652.74 17,932.87 17,932.87- 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3956 RESIDUAL TRANSFER -IN REVENUE CONTROL CONTINGENCY FUND 1,850,874.00 1,850,874.00 1,850,874.00 .00 1,850,874.00 15,652.74 1,868,806.87 15,652.74 1,868,806.87 *** .00 100.0 17,932.87- 101.0 17,932.87- 101.0 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 28 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 119,000.00 21,407.32 92,877.33 26,122.67 78.0 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 1,887.00 76.19 1,508.42 378.58 79.9 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 824.00- 158.55- 804.25- 19.75- 97.6 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 120,063.00 21,324.96 93,581.50 26,481.50 77.9 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 400,000.00 33,333.00 333,330.00 66,670.00 83.3 REVENUE CONTROL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 520,063.00 54,657.96 426,911.50 93,151.50 82.1 520,063.00 54,657.96 426,911.50 93,151.50 82.1 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 302 ARTESIA BLVD RELINQUISHMENT • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 29 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 7,344.00 4,099.64 9,888.05 2,544.05- 134.6 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 30.00 14.57 100.34 70.34- 334.5 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 14.00- .00 .00 14.00- 0.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 7,360.00 4,114.21 9,988.39 2,628.39- 135.7 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3556 ARTESIA BLVD RELINQUISHMENT REVENUE CONTROL ARTESIA BLVD RELINQUISHMENT 491,120.00 498,480.00 498,480.00 .00 491,120.00 4,114.21 501,108.39 4,114.21 501,108.39 .00 100.0 2,628.39- 100.5 2,628.39- 100.5 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 30 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3,131.00 556.93 2,407.18 723.82 76.9 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 51.00 1.98 40.16 10.84 78.7 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 22.00- 4.12- 21.29- .71- 96.8 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3,160.00 554.79 2,426.05 733.95 76.8 REVENUE CONTROL 3,160.00 554.79 2,426.05 733.95 76.8 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 3,160.00 554.79 2,426.05 733.95 76.8 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 31 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 910.00 149.48 657.58 252.42 72.3 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 18.00 .54 14.37 3.63 79.8 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 8.00- 1.13- 7.17- .83- 89.6 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 920.00 148.89 664.78 255.22 72.3 REVENUE CONTROL 920.00 148.89 664.78 255.22 72.3 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND 920.00 148.89 664.78 255.22 72.3 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 308 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 32 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 7,137.00 1,023.28 5,116.82 2,020.18 71.7 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 122.00 3.55 91.50 30.50 75.0 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 53.00- 7.38- 46.38- 6.62- 87.5 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 7,206.00 1,019.45 5,161.94 2,044.06 71.6 REVENUE CONTROL 7,206.00 1,019.45 5,161.94 2,044.06 71.6 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND 7,206.00 1,019.45 5,161.94 2,044.06 71.6 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 610 LWR PIER DIST REDEMPTION FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 33 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 343.00 138.46 342.68 .32 99.9 REVENUE CONTROL 343.00 138.46 342.68 .32 99.9 LWR PIER DIST REDEMPTION FUND 343.00 138.46 342.68 .32 99.9 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 617 MYRTLE AVE ASSESSMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 3401 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY INTEREST INCOME REVENUE CONTROL MYRTLE AVE ASSESSMENT FUND 1,916.00 1,916.00 1,916.00 405.76 405.76 405.76 1,549.42 1,549.42 1,549.42 PAGE 34 BALANCE % COL 366.58 80.9 366.58 80.9 366.58 80.9 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 618 LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.37. OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 35 BALANCE 7. COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 1,827.00 451.21 1,525.83 301.17 83.5 REVENUE CONTROL 1,827.00 451.21 1,525.83 301.17 83.5 LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND 1,827.00 451.21 1,525.83 301.17 83.5 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 705 INSURANCE FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3880 INSURANCE SERVICE CHARGES PAGE 36 BALANCE % COL 1,168,533.00 97,378.00 973,776.00 194,757.00 83.3 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 72.00 .00 12,572.00 12,500.00- 999.9+ 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 100,000.00 .00 100,000.00 .00 100.0 OTHER REVENUE 100,072.00 .00 112,572.00 12,500.00- 112.5 REVENUE CONTROL 1,268,605.00 97,378.00 1,086,348.00 182,257.00 85.6 INSURANCE FUND 1,268,605.00 97,378.00 1,086,348.00 182,257.00 85.6 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 3889 PAGE 37 BALANCE % COL 998,351.00 83,195.00 831,950.00 166,401.00 83.3 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 SALE OF REAL/PERS PROPERTY 20,000.00 157.50 28,152.84 8,152.84- 140.8 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB-PREVIOUS YEARS 7.00 .00 7.00 .00 100.0 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 2,834.00 248.00 2,336.00 498.00 82.4 OTHER REVENUE 22,841.00 405.50 30,495.84 7,654.84- 133.5 REVENUE CONTROL 1,021,192.00 83,600.50 862,445.84 158,746.16 84.5 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,021,192.00 83,600.50 862,445.84 158,746.16 84.5 REVPRIN2 05/22/02 08:22:04 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 38 BALANCE % COL REVENUE CONTROL 29,278,602.00 3,427,743.07 23,807,670.14 5,470,931.86 81.3 GRAND TOTALS 29,278,602.00 3,427,743.07 23,807,670.14 5,470,931.86 81.3 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 1 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE/LEGAL 1101 CITY COUNCIL 1101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 27,036.00 2,253.02 22,530.10 .00 4,505.90 83.3 1101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 264.00 .00 .00 .00 264.00 0.0 1101-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 39,000.00 3,250.00 33,043.10 .00 5,956.90 84.7 1101-4180 RETIREMENT 3,176.00 281.15 2,718.46 .00 457.54 85.6 1101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 34,061.00 2,220.85 24,410.73 .00 9,650.27 71.7 1101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,441.00 79.84 1,007.10 .00 433.90 69.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 104,978.00 8,084.86 83,709.49 .00 21,268.51 79.7 1101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,272.00 200.00 3,798.45 .00 1,473.55 72.0 1101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1101-4304 TELEPHONE 150.00 .00 80.70 .00 69.30 53.8 1101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 6,000.00 460.93 4,707.58 .00 1,292.42 78.5 1101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 15,000.00 .00 14,614.06 .00 385.94 97.4 1101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 10,500.00 29.33 6,975.16 .00 3,524.84 66.4 1101-4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 7,000.00 1,380.18 3,733.62 .00 3,266.38 53.3 1101-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 19,425.00 1,619.00 16,190.00 .00 3,235.00 83.3 1101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 6,241.00 520.00 5,200.00 .00 1,041.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 64,31,6.00 4,009.44 51,501.12 .00 12,814.88 80.1 1101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1101-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 4,750.00 .00 .00 14,250.00 9,500.00- 300.0 CITY COUNCIL 179,316.00 12,294.30 139,009.06 14,250.00 26,056.94 85.5 1121 CITY CLERK 1121-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1121-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 67,884.00 1,456.50 26,273.81 .00 41,610.19 38.7 1121-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,223.00 1,109.18 21,785.18 .00 20,562.18- 999.9+ 1121-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 29,685.00 3,151.00 34,413.10 .00 4,728.10- 115.9 1121-4180 RETIREMENT 7,078.00 345.12 4,026.19 .00 3,051.81 56.9 1121-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11,227.00 589.26 6,282.20 .00 4,944.80 56.0 1121-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,158.00 83.03 1,197.09 .00 39.09- 103.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 118,255.00 6,734.09 93,977.57 .00 24,277.43 79.5 1121-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1121-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 29,164.00 48.00 15,980.09 .00 13,183.91 54.8 1121-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 37,286.00 .00 30,785.78 .00 6,500.22 82.6 CONTRACT SERVICES 66,450.00 48.00 46,765.87 .00 19,684.13 70.4 1121-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1121-4304 TELEPHONE 275.00 17.36 244.45 .00 30.55 88.9 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 2 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1121-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 5,500.00 151.40 2,914.76 .00 2,585.24 53.0 1121-4315 MEMBERSHIP 350.00 .00 205.00 .00 145.00 58.6 1121-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 5,700.00 .00 2,230.86 .00 3,469.14 39.1 1121-4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 10,500.00 1,466.87 6,644.11 .00 3,855.89 63.3 1121-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 9,325.00 777.00 ' 7,770.00 .00 1,555.00 83.3 1121-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 3,583.00 298.00 2,981.00 .00 602.00 83.2 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 35,233.00 2,710.63 22,990.18 .00 12,242.82 65.3 1121-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1121-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 2,400.00 .00 .00 .00 2,400.00 0.0 CITY CLERK 222,338.00 9,492.72 163,733.62 .00 58,604.38 73.6 1131 CITY ATTORNEY 1131-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1131-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 180,000.00 8,204.90 143,986.56 .00 36,013.44 80.0 1131-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1131-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 100.00 .00 19.13 .00 80.87 19.1 CITY ATTORNEY 180,100.00 8,204.90 144,005.69 .00 36,094.31 80.0 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR 1132-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1132-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,219.00 300.78 2,801.47 .00 417.53 87.0 1132-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1132-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 113,600.00 9,075.00 92,118.87 .00 21,481.13 81.1 1132-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1132-4304 TELEPHONE 125.00 .57 81.97 .00 43.03 65.6 1132-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 520.00 .00 .00 .00 520.00 0.0 1132-4315 MEMBERSHIP 100.00 .00 200.00 .00 100.00- 200.0 1132-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 400.00 .00 310.12 .00 89.88 77.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,145.00 .57 592.09 .00 552.91 51.7 CITY PROSECUTOR 117,964.00 9,376.35 95,512.43 .00 22,451.57 81.0 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1141-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 21;456.00 1,622.50 15,976.54 .00 5,479.46 74.5 1141-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 155.00 .00 139.26 .00 15.74 89.8 1141-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 94.00 .00 .00 .00 94.00 0.0 1141-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 16,704.00 1,325.50 13,255.00 .00 3,449.00 79.4 1141-4180 RETIREMENT 2,940.00 220.82 2,186.85 .00 753.15 74.4 1141-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8,008.00 810.45 6,919.69 .00 1,088.31 86.4 1141-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 553.00 42.76 426.23 .00 126.77 77.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 49,910.00 4,022.03 38,903.57 .00 11,006.43 77.9 1141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 001 CITY TREASURER • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 3 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 11,125.00 3,203.63 9,428.10 .00 1,696.90 84.7 1141-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1141-4304 TELEPHONE 750.00 68.32 615.82 .00 134.18 82.1 1141-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,700.00 157.41 1,771.98 .00 71.98- 104.2 1141-4315 MEMBERSHIP 140.00 .00 145.00 .00 5.00- 103.6 1141-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 840.00 .00 663.11 .00 176.89 78.9 1141-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 1,689.00 141.00 1,410.00 .00 279.00 83.5 1141-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,979.00 165.00 1,650.00 .00 329.00 83.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 7,098.00 531.73 6,255.91 .00 842.09 88.1 CITY TREASURER 68,133.00 7,757.39 54,587.58 .00 13,545.42 80.1 LEGISLATIVE/LEGAL 767,851.00 47,125.66 596,848.38 14,250.00 156,752.62 79.6 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1201 CITY MANAGER 1201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 165,900.00 13,824.92 136,030.38 .00 29,869.62 82.0 1201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 11,280.00 .00 2,213.16 .00 9,066.84 19.6 1201-4180 RETIREMENT 12,008.00 943.24 9,432.56 .00 2,575.44 78.6 1201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 21,021.00 1,760.42 17,058.00 .00 3,963.00 81.1 1201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,272.00 189.42 1,931.81 .00 340.19 85.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 212,481.00 16,718.00 166,665.91 .00 45,815.09 78.4 1201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 675.00 .00 180.00 .00 495.00 26.7 1201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1201-4304 TELEPHONE 1,000.00 82.99 733.62 .00 266.38 73.4 1201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,500.00 32.89 1,444.27 .00 55.73 96.3 1201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,500.00 .00 1,165.00 .00 335.00 77.7 1201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 5,500.00 82.47 1,424.50 .00 4,075.50 25.9 1201-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 54,741.00 4,562.00 45,620.00 .00 , 9,121.00 83.3 1201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 6,429.00 536.00 5,357.00 .00 1,072.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 70,670.00 5,296.35 55,744.39 .00 14,925.61 78.9 CITY MANAGER 283,826.00 22,014.35 222,590.30 .00 61,235.70 78.4 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1202-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 302,253.00 23,469.36 249,658.10 .00 52,594.90 82.6 1202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,078.00 .00 139.26 .00 938.74 12.9 1202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 20,440.00 .00 15,604.12 .00 4,835.88 76.3 1202-4180 RETIREMENT 22,372.00 1,735.56 18,473.82 .00 3,898.18 82.6 1202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 37,191.00 3,019.54 29,908.43 .00 7,282.57 80.4 1202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,176.00 169.82 1,880.64 .00 295.36 86.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 385,510.00 28,394.28 315,664.37 .00 69,845.63 81.9 1202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 4 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1202-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 199,192.00 562.50 50,115.12 135,632.51 13,444.37 93.3 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1202-4304 TELEPHONE 2,550.00 166.51 1,558.14 .00 991.86 61.1 1202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 8,800.00 879.01 9,088.32 .00 288.32- 103.3 1202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 325.00 .00 300.00 .00 25.00 92.3 1202-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 5,610.00 65.00 5,804.32 .00 194.32- 103.5 1202-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 18,347.00 1,529.00 15,290.00 .00 3,057.00 83.3 1202-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 6,119.00 510.00 5,100.00 .00 1,019.00 83.3 1202-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 13,066.00 1,089.00 10,890.00 .00 2,176.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 54,817.00 4,238.52 48,030.78 .00 6,786.22 87.6 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 639,519.00 33,195.30 413,810.27 135,632.51 90,076.22 85.9 1203 PERSONNEL 1203-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1203-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 71,979.00 5,747.53 61,666.65 .00 10,312.35 85.7 1203-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,088.00 .00 806.08 .00 2,281.92 26.1 1203-4180 RETIREMENT 5,234.00 417.40 4,487.89 .00 746.11 85.7 1203-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 28,744.00 950.21 24,497.65 .00 4,246.35 85.2 1203-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,015.00 85.82 932.39 .00 82.61 91.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 110,060.00 7,200.96 92,390.66 .00 17,669.34 83.9 1203-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1203-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 83,175.00 1,811.57 72,018.28 1,500.00 9,656.72 88.4 1203-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 7,000.00 .00 1,023.00 .00 5,977.00 14.6 CONTRACT SERVICES 90,175.00 1,811.57 73,041.28 1,500.00 15,633.72 82.7 1203-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1203-4304 TELEPHONE 1,350.00 136.72 1,045.16 .00 304.84 77.4 1203-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,500.00 314.78 2,991.07 .00 1,508.93 66.5 1203-4315 MEMBERSHIP 820.00 .00 774.00 .00 46.00 94.4 1203-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 14,650.00 .00 3,787.80 .00 10,862.20 25.9 1203-4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 18,925.00 1,086.00 9,602.00 .00 9,323.00 50.7 1203-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 7,298.00 608.00 6,080.00 .00 1,218.00 83.3 1203-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 3,663.00 305.00 3,050.00 .00 613.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 51,206.00 2,450.50 27,330.03 .00 23,875.97 53.4 PERSONNEL 251,441.00 11,463.03 192,761.97 1,500.00 57,179.03 77.3 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS 1208-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1208-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 47,203.00 2,941.00 27,259.39 .00 19,943.61 57.7 1208-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,238.00 .00 .00 .00 4,238.00 0.0 1208-4180 RETIREMENT 3,535.00 220.30 2,041.89 .00 1,493.11 57.8 1208-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,415.00 653.49 5,951.17 .00 2,536.17- 174.3 1208-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 684.00 42.64 395.22 .00 288.78 57.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 59,075.00 3,857.43 35,647.67 .00 23,427.33 60.3 1208-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 5 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1208-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 11,025.00 264.28 10,124.79 .00 900.21 91.8 1208-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1208-4304 TELEPHONE 150.00 8.54 99.27 .00 50.73 66.2 1208-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 35,592.00- 1,701.18- 29,034.76- .00 6,557.24- 81.6 1208-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 4,321.00 360.00 3,600.00 .00 721.00 83.3 1208-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,861.00 155.00 1,550.00 .00 311.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 29,260.00- 1,177.64- 23,785.49- .00 5,474.51- 81.3 1208-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1208-5402 EQUIP MORE THAN $500 4,464.00 4,463.25 4,463.25 .00 .75 100.0 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS 45,304.00 7,407.32 26,450.22 .00 18,853.78 58.4 1214 PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES 1214-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1214-4322 UNCLASSIFIED 76,332.00 .00 .00 .00 76,332.00 0.0 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4398 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR OUT 1,564,296.00 .00 1,564,296.00 .00 .00 100.0 1299-4399 BUDGET TRANSFERS OUT 1,102,834.00 91,914.00 918,996.00 .00 183,838.00 83.3 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 2,667,130.00 91,914.00 2,483,292.00 .00 183,838.00 93.1 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 3,963,552.00 165,994.00 3,338,904.76 137,132.51 487,514.73 87.7 2100 POLICE 2101 POLICE 2101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 3,097,703.00 229,304.50 2,162,652.82 .00 935,050.18 69.8 2101-4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 54,405.00 3,606.50 41,543.49 .00 12,861.51 76.4 2101-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 268,040.00 19,696.91 176,145.05 .00 91,894.95 65.7 2101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 350,215.00 11,222.85 272,301.32 .00 77,913.68 77.8 2101-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 5,000.00 .00 325.00 .00 4,675.00 6.5 2101-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4,200.00 616.42 5,075.84 .00 875.84- 120.9 2101-4118 TRAINING OFFICER 9,000.00 837.45 4,845.85 .00 4,154.15 53.8 2101-4180 RETIREMENT 907,650.00 69,231.12 672,583.47 .00 235,066.53 74.1 2101-4187 UNIFORM EXPENSE 47,920.00 3,648.27 31,438.90 507.21 15,973.89 66.7 2101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 284,178.00 22,318.01 205,623.10 .00 78,554.90 72.4 2101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 26,174.00 2,626.06 25,445.42 .00 728.58 97.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 5,054,485.00 363,108.09 3,597,980.26 507.21 1,455,997.53 71.2 2101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 55,053.00 6,531.47 49,233.45 900.00 4,919.55 91.1 2101-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 386,805.00 85,346.84 299,163.56 .00 87,641.44 77.3 CONTRACT SERVICES 441,858.00 91,878.31 348,397.01 900.00 92,560.99 79.1 2101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 6 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.37. OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE Y. USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2101-4304 TELEPHONE 52,455.00 5,555.26 41,632.15 1,420.00 9,402.85 82.1 _ 2101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 32,885.00 3,558.23 25,176.93 777.56 6,930.51 78.9 2101-4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 6,000.00 528.04 4,367.80 708.60 923.60 84.6 2101-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 3,500.00 .00 2,012.85 .00 1,487.15 57.5 2101-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,600.00 156.50 3,414.32 461.12 724.56 84.2 2101-4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 10,000.00 2,086.91 8,949.02 .00 1,050.98 89.5 2101-4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 4,500.00 680.30 2,355.27 .00 2,144.73 52.3 2101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,330.00 .00 760.00 .00 570.00 57.1 2101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 17,375.00 90.50 7,876.97 .00 9,498.03 45.3 2101-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 130,536.00 10,878.00 108,780.00 .00 21,756.00 83.3 2101-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 294,896.00 24,575.00 245,750.00 .00 49,146.00 83.3 2101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 528,908.00 44,076.00 440,759.00 .00 88,149.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,086,985.00 92,184.74 891,834.31 3,367.28 191,783.41 82.4 2101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2101-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 620.00 .00 619.53 .00 .47 99.9 2101-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 19,380.00 .00 9,915.87 .00 9,464.13 51.2 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 20,000.00 .00 10,535.40 .00 9,464.60 52.7 POLICE 6,603,328.00 547,171.14 4,848,746.98 4,774.49 1,749,806.53 73.5 2102 CROSSING GUARD 2102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 60,085.00 7,807.71 42,454.76 17,630.24 .00 100.0 POLICE 6,663,413.00 554,978.85 4,891,201.74 22,404.73 1,749,806.53 73.7 2200 FIRE 2201 FIRE 2201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,511,744.00 126,446.14 1,153,475.61 .00 358,268.39 76.3 2201-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 253,370.00 16,315.50 245,989.78 .00 7,380.22 97.1 2201-4108 FLSA OVERTIME 126,500.00 8,559.35 131,857.97 .00 5,357.97- 104.2 2201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 145,278.00 3,746.66 53,171.60 .00 92,106.40 36.6 2201-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 41,000.00 2,900.00 32,400.00 .00 8,600.00 79.0 2201-4119 FITNESS INCENTIVE 10,200.00 1,500.00 4,650.00 .00 5,550.00 45.6 2201-4180 RETIREMENT 335,459.00 27,830.10 264,460.96 .00 70,998.04 78.8 2201-4187 UNIFORM EXPENSE 19,175.00 1,622.90- 19,087.58 448.78 361.36- 101.9 2201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 171,174.00 13,051.03 122,738.67 .00 48,435.33 71.7 2201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 13,514.00 1,558.76 14,956.04 .00 1,442.04- 110.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 2,627,414.00 203,530.44 2,042,788.21 448.78 584,177.01 77.8 2201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 26,931.00 3,239.05 22,927.49 3,000.00 1,003.51 96.3 2201-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 55,560.00 10,650.00 45,200.00 .00 10,360.00 81.4 CONTRACT SERVICES 82,491.00 13,889.05 68,127.49 3,000.00 11,363.51 86.2 2201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 7 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2201-4304 TELEPHONE 13,272.00 1,264.45 10,233.48 .00 3,038.52 77.1 2201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9,566.00 2,117.36 4,714.01 870.00 3,981.99 58.4 2201-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 18,887.00 912.33 16,638.34 1,165.00 1,083.66 94.3 2201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 3,580.00 375.00 1,672.47 .00 1,907.53 46.7 2201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 33,242.00 1,230.00 19,998.00 .00 13,244.00 60.2 2201-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 26,168.00 2,181.00 21,810.00 .00 4,358.00 83.3 2201-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 96,269.00 8,022.00 80,220.00 .00 16,049.00 83.3 2201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 183,348.00 15,280.00 152,794.00 .00 30,554.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 384,332.00 31,382.14 308,080.30 2,035.00 74,216.70 80.7 2201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2201-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 6,607.00 281.38 5,007.88 434.71 1,164.41 82.4 2201-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 25,624.00 .00 9,351.36 .00 16,272.64 36.5 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 32,231.00 281.38 14,359.24 434.71 17,437.05 45.9 FIRE 3,126,468.00 249,083.01 2,433,355.24 5,918.49 687,194.27 78.0 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 3104-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3104-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 212,101.00 17,867.57 179,081.64 .00 33,019.36 84.4 3104-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 3,500.00 1,135.33 5,187.80 .00 1,687.80- 148.2 3104-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,162.00 1,618.17 2,617.55 .00 544.45 82.8 3104-4180 RETIREMENT 15,823.00 1,340.68 13,429.90 .00 2,393.10 84.9 3104-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 27,267.00 2,291.05 21,979.22 .00 5,287.78 80.6 3104-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 781.00 81.94 722.88 .00 58.12 92.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 262,634.00 24,334.74 223,018.99 .00 39,615.01 84.9 3104-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3104-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 315,631.00 22,019.09 161,815.16 133,571.78 20,244.06 93.6 3104-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 20,850.00 .00 419.72 .00 20,430.28 2.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 336,481.00 22,019.09 162,234.88 133,571.78 40,674.34 87.9 3104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3104-4303 UTILITIES 17,380.00 1,723.30 12,598.30 .00 4,781.70 72.5 3104-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 58,350.00 17,365.74 47,935.63 947.19 9,467.18 83.8 3104-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 14,348.00 1,196.00 11,960.00 .00 2,388.00 83.4 3104-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 97,674.00 8,138.00 81,385.00 .00 16,289.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 187,752.00 28,423.04 153,878.93 947.19 32,925.88 82.5 3104-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3104-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 400.00 .00 399.38 .00 .62 99.8 3104-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 7,750.00 1,634.58 1,634.58 .00 6,115.42 21.1 3104-5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS 10,000.00 .00 .00 .00 10,000.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 18,150.00 1,634.58 2,033.96 .00 16,116.04 11.2 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 805,017.00 76,411.45 541,166.76 134,518.97 129,331.27 83.9 4100 PLANNING 4101 PLANNING 4101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 8 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 251,397.00 23,010.10 , 212,571.44 .00 38,825.56 84.6 4101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,257.00 .00 2,153.45 .00 4,103.55 34.4 4101-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 30,000.00 1,971.17 21,674.07 .00 8,325.93 72.2 4101-4180 RETIREMENT 22,826.00 1,873.39 17,528.48 .00 5,297.52 76.8 4101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 32,460.00 2,586.12 24,223.10 .00 8,236.90 74.6 4101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 3,423.00 300.74 3,766.57 .00 343.57- 110.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 346,363.00 29,741.52 281,917.11 .00 64,445.89 81.4 4101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 48,820.00 1,926.00 20,996.00 5,813.00 22,011.00 54.9 4101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4101-4304 TELEPHONE 950.00 76.86 931.32 .00 18.68 98.0 4101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 6,000.00 729.35 6,064.13 .00 64.13- 101.1 4101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,270.00 .00 746.00 .00 524.00 58.7 4101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 8,120.00 .00 1,095.00 .00 7,025.00 13.5 4101-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 7,409.00 617.00 6,170.00 .00 1,239.00 83.3 4101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 9,354.00 779.00 7,790.00 .00 1,564.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 33,103.00 2,202.21 22,796.45 .00 10,306.55 68.9 PLANNING 428,286.00 33,869.73 325,709.56 5,813.00 96,763.44 77.4 4200 CONST/ENG/ENF 4201 COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 4201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 206,546.00 12,277.32 131,062.64 .00 75,483.36 63.5 4201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,264.00 .00 1,911.56 .00 2,352.44 44.8 4201-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 35,000.00 2,640.53 27,562.48 .00 7,437.52 78.7 4201-4180 RETIREMENT 17,302.00 930.08 10,047.55 .00 7,254.45 58.1 4201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 35,449.00 1,958.40 17,860.95 .00 17,588.05 50.4 4201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 3,353.00 263.94 3,575.14 .00 222.14- 106.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 301,914.00 18,070.27 192,020.32 .00 109,893.68 63.6 4201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 268,377.00 14,200.00 156,420.50 14,132.50 97,824.00 63.5 4201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4201-4304 TELEPHONE 2,675.00 272.96 2,048.73 .00 626.27 76.6 4201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 5,600.00 188.33 4,596.33 159.95 843.72 84.9 4201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,720.00 .00 745.00 .00 975.00 43.3 4201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,500.00 10.00 2,050.27 .00 1,449.73 58.6 4201-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 13,335.00 1,111.00 11,110.00 .00 2,225.00 83.3 4201-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 12,118.00 1,010.00 10,100.00 .00 2,018.00 83.3 4201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 15,140.00 1,262.00 12,620.00 .00 2,520.00 83.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 54,088.00 3,854.29 43,270.33 159.95 10,657.72 80.3 4201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 9 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4201-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 200.00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 0.0 4201-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 200.00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 0.0 4201-5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 4201-5602 IMPRVMNTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 0.0 COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 627,079.00 36,124.56 391,711.15 14,292.45 221,075.40 64.7 4202 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 4202-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 110,316.00 9,405.11 93,936.78 .00 16,379.22 85.2 4202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 5,000.00 317.14 900.42 .00 4,099.58 18.0 4202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,719.00 .00 823.03 .00 1,895.97 30.3 4202-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 2,352.63 8,026.62 .00 8,026.62- *** 4202-4180 RETIREMENT 8,151.00 652.71 6,915.17 .00 1,235.83 84.8 4202-4187 UNIFORM EXPENSE 11,500.00 1,846.26 6,797.24 516.45 4,186.31 63.6 4202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 9,342.00 1,007.91 10,452.69 .00 1,110.69- 111.9 0. 4202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,600.00 312.26 1,989.34 .00 389.34- 124.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 148,628.00 15,894.02 129,841.29 516.45 18,270.26 87.7 4202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4202-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 27,460.00 4,635.40 15,074.81 3,022.75 9,362.44 65.9 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4304 TELEPHONE 17,600.00 1,557.25 13,292.49 .00 4,307.51 75.5 4202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 11,500.00 1,606.44 9,293.15 192.69 2,014.16 82.5 4202-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 4202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,350.00 50.00 965.00 .00 385.00 71.5 4202-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 11,900.00 394.01 7,365.04 180.00 4,354.96 63.4 4202-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 17,365.00 1,447.00 14,470.00 .00 2,895.00 83.3 4202-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 10,758.00 896.00 8,960.00 .00 1,798.00 83.3 4202-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 50,400.00 4,200.00 42,000.00 .00 8,400.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 120,873.00 10,150.70 96,345.68 372.69 24,154.63 80.0 4202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 825.00 .00 94.07 .00 730.93 11.4 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 297,786.00 30,680.12 241,355.85 3,911.89 52,518.26 82.4 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 75,932.00 6,397.50 63,179.70 .00 12,752.30 83.2 4204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 2,500.00 265.00 2,000.90 .00 499.10 80.0 4204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,249.00 207.86 2,754.95 .00 1,505.95- 220.6 4204-4180 RETIREMENT 5,687.00 482.03 4,760.76 .00 926.24 83.7 4204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10,366.00 900.32 8,386.22 .00 1,979.78 80.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 95,734.00 8,252.71 81,082.53 .00 14,651.47 84.7 4204-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 10 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4204-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 115,030.00 10,132.04 81,204.70 .00 33,825.30 70.6 4204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204-4303 UTILITIES 144,707.00 1,167.78 71,752.50 .00 72,954.50 49.6 4204-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 18,500.00 2,201.79 15,457.37 998.68 2,043.95 89.0 4204-4321 BUILDING SFTY/SECURITY 4,500.00 207.69 4,483.11 .00 16.89 99.6 4204-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 10,625.00 885.00 8,850.00 .00 1,775.00 83.3 4204-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 13,010.00 1,084.00 10,840.00 .00 2,170.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 191,342.00 5,546.26 111,382.98 998.68 78,960.34 58.7 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 402,106.00 23,931.01 273,670.21 998.68 127,437.11 68.3 CONST/ENG/ENF 1,326,971.00 90,735.69 906,737.21 19,203.02 401,030.77 69.8 4600 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 290,852.00 24,038.97 232,962.90 .00 57,889.10 80.1 4601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4,000.00 .00 410.00- .00 4,410.00 10.3- 4601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 8,652.00 .00 8,020.22 .00 631.78 92.7 4601-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 168,000.00 9,122.06 100,940.79 .00 67,059.21 60.1 4601-4180 RETIREMENT 21,620.00 1,849.32 17,825.66 .00 3,794.34 82.4 4601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 41,521.00 2,833.51 27,078.55 .00 14,442.45 65.2 4601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 14,960.00 716.44 6,953.52 .00 8,006.48 46.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 549,605.00 38,560.30 393,371.64 .00 156,233.36 71.6 4601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4601-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 47,921.00 1,834.04 41,851.19 .00 6,069.81 87.3 4601-4221 CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR 167,190.00 20,737.50 139,719.13 .00 27,470.87 83.6 4601-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 384.00 .00 384.00 .00 .00 100.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 215,495.00 22,571.54 181,954.32 .00 33,540.68 84.4 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4601-4302 ADVERTISING 21,000.00 289.55 16,197.47 .00 4,802.53 77.1 4601-4304 TELEPHONE 9,300.00 841.43 6,074.68 .00 3,225.32 65.3 4601-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 11,000.00 614.86 7,327.74 447.26 3,225.00 70.7 4601-4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 33,745.00 6,801.90 23,700.82 696.59 9,347.59 72.3 4601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1,803.00 .00 423.49 .00 1,379.51 23.5 4601-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,100.00 50.00 1,080.00 .00 20.00 98.2 4601-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 5,600.00 .00 1,573.50 .00 4,026.50 28.1 4601-4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 10,000.00 .00 7,602.93 .00 2,397.07 76.0 4601-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 20,069.00 1,672.00 16,720.00 .00 3,349.00 83.3 4601-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 13,406.00 1,117.00 11,170.00 .00 2,236.00 83.3 4601-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 23,900.00 1,992.00 19,920.00 .00 3,980.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 150,923.00 13,378.74 111,790.63 1,143.85 37,988.52 74.8 4601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4601-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 12,255.00 .00 3,676.16 1,418.81 7,160.03 41.6 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 11 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE 7. USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4601-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 14,997.00 .00 12,605.09 .00 2,391.91 84.1 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 27,252.00 .00 16,281.25 1,418.81 9,551.94 64.9 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 943,275.00 74,510.58 703,397.84 2,562.66 237,314.50 74.8 6100 PARKS AND RECREATION 6101 PARKS 6101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 6101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 92,618.00 7,788.34 77,333.16 .00 15,284.84 83.5 6101-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 2,400.00 74.24 301.88 .00 2,098.12 12.6 6101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,078.00 .00 2,088.11 .00 1,989.89 51.2 6101-4180 RETIREMENT 6,937.00 586.77 5,808.15 .00 1,128.85 83.7 6101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10,584.00 998.87 8,992.70 .00 1,591.30 85.0 6101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 497.00 42.54 445.02 .00 51.98 89.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 117,114.00 9,490.76 94,969.02 .00 22,144.98 81.1 6101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 6101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 229,665.00 19,159.58 168,009.49 65,678.94 4,023.43- 101.8 6101-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 610.00 .00 609.26 .00 .74 99.9 CONTRACT SERVICES 230,275.00 19,159.58 168,618.75 65,678.94 4,022.69- 101.7 6101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 6101-4303 UTILITIES 123,500.00 14,856.97 92,896.46 .00 30,603.54 75.2 6101-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 22,400.00 1,932.47 12,888.69 2,645.68 6,865.63 69.3 6101-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHRGS 19,880.00 1,657.00 16,570.00 .00 3,310.00 83.4 6101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 16,988.00 1,416.00 14,160.00 .00 2,828.00 83.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 182,768.00 19,862.44 136,515.15 2,645.68 43,607.17 76.1 6101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 6101-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 2,000.00 193.77 1,462.38 193.77 343.85 82.8 6101-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 2,400.00 .00 .00 .00 2,400.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4,400.00 193.77 1,462.38 193.77 2,743.85 37.6 PARKS AND RECREATION 534,557.00 48,706.55 401,565.30 68,518.39 64,473.31 87.9 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 239,256.00 4,995.67 54,380.14 135,424.26 49,451.60 79.3 8630 PIER RENOVATION/PHASE III 8630-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8630-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 220,000.00 4,000.00 47,752.25 122,827.59 49,420.16 77.5 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 459,256.00 8,995.67 102,132.39 258,251.85 98,871.76 78.5 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 19,018,646.00 1,350,411.19 14,241,019.18 668,573.62 4,109,053.20 78.4 GENERAL FUND 19,018,646.00 1,350,411.19 14,241,019.18 668,573.62 4,109,053.20 78.4 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 12 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 20,018.00 1,668.00 16,681.00 .00 3,337.00 83.3 2600 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 2601 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS 2601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 200,176.00 12,888.61 130,955.69 .00 69,220.31 65.4 2601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,000.00 31.81 563.39 .00 436.61 56.3 2601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,094.00 .00 5,345.45 .00 2,251.45- 172.8 2601-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 2,338.79 22,280.79 .00 22,280.79- *** 2601-4180 RETIREMENT 14,931.00 957.96 9,798.40 .00 5,132.60 65.6 2601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 21,857.00 1,769.36 17,401.50 .00 4,455.50 79.6 2601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,065.00 149.89 2,342.41 .00 277.41- 113.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 243,123.00 18,136.42 188,687.63 .00 54,435.37 77.6 2601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2601-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 37,889.00 2,160.89 38,294.10 2,025.00 2,430.10- 106.4 2601-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 20,500.00 2,003.51 10,459.72 .00 10,040.28 51.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 58,389.00 4,164.40 48,753.82 2,025.00 7,610.18 87.0 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2601-4303 UTILITIES 188,235.00 13,292.18 121,368.63 .00 66,866.37 64.5 2601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 22,300.00 2,554.65 14,518.32 .00 7,781.68 65.1 2601-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 31,566.00 2,630.00 26,300.00 .00 5,266.00 83.3 2601-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 32,925.00 2,744.00 27,440.00 .00 5,485.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 275,026.00 21,220.83 189,626.95 .00 85,399.05 68.9 2601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2601-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 400.00 .00 399.38 .00 .62 99.8 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 576,938.00 43,521.65 427,467.78 2,025.00 147,445.22 74.4 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 596,956.00 45,189.65 444,148.78 2,025.00 150,782.22 74.7 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 596,956.00 45,189.65 444,148.78 2,025.00 150,782.22 74.7 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 13 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 5,825.00 264.00 5,301.25 .00 523.75 91.0 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3301 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 3301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3301-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 31,637.00 2,479.01 26,268.22 .00 5,368.78 83.0 3301-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 700.00 .00 11.45 .00 688.55 1.6 3301-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 418.00 .00 551.76 .00 133.76- 132.0 3301-4180 RETIREMENT 2,279.00 178.75 1,940.76 .00 338.24 85.2 3301-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,827.00 271.23 2,992.34 .00 834.66 78.2 3301-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 355.00 27.66 317.43 .00 37.57 89.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 39,216.00 2,956.65 32,081.96 .00 7,134.04 81.8 3301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 134,164.00 10,025.00 89,597.69 45,975.01 1,408.70- 101.0 3301-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3301-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2,500.00 .00 94.95 .00 2,405.05 3.8 3301-4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 52,379.00 .00 44,511.70 .00 7,867.30 85.0 3301-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 2,312.00 193.00 1,930.00 .00 382.00 83.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 57,191.00 193.00 46,536.65 .00 10,654.35 81.4 3301-4900 DEPRECIATION 3301-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 463.00 .00 .00 .00 463.00 0.0 3301-4903 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 3301-4904 DEPRECIATION/IMPROVMNTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** DEPRECIATION 463.00 .00 .00 .00 463.00 0.0 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 231,034.00 13,174.65 168,216.30 45,975.01 16,842.69 92.7 3304 NORTH PIER PARKING STRUCTURE 3304-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3304-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 17,891.00 489.50 11,442.63 4,310.20 2,138.17 88.0 3304-4231 CONTRACT SERV/PKG LOT OPERATOR 148,068.00 12,151.44 115,787.76 24,780.23 7,500.01 94.9 CONTRACT SERVICES 165,959.00 12,640.94 127,230.39 29,090.43 9,638.18 94.2 3304-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3304-4303 UTILITIES 40,200.00 2,863.13 26,916.11 .00 13,283.89 67.0 3304-4304 TELEPHONE 400.00 74.55 322.67 .00 77.33 80.7 3304-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2,100.00 390.63 447.33 .00 1,652.67 21.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 42,700.00 3,328.31 27,686.11 .00 15,013.89 64.8 3304-4900 DEPRECIATION EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 14 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3304-4903 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS 116,350.00 .00 .00 .00 116,350.00 0.0 NORTH PIER PARKING STRUCTURE 325,009.00 15,969.25 154,916.50 29,090.43 141,002.07 56.6 3305 DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT A 3305-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3305-4231 CONTRACT SERV/PKG LOT OPERATOR 122,694.00 11,392.45 89,667.48 25,526.52 7,500.00 93.9 3306 CO. SHARE PKG STRUCTURE REV. 3306-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3306-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 118,327.00 .00 .00 .00 118,327.00 0.0 3307 LIFEGUARD SERV/BEACH MAINT 3307-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3307-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 55,000.00 .00 55,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 PARKING FACILITIES 852,064.00 40,536.35 467,800.28 100,591.96 283,671.76 66.7 8100 STREET SAFETY 8140 11TH PL STREET PARKING IMP 8140-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8140-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 5,325.00 .00 2,082.62 .00 3,242.38 39.1 8140-4180 RETIREMENT 399.00 .00 155.99 .00 243.01 39.1 8140-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 499.00 .00 245.87 .00 253.13 49.3 8140-4189 FICA 77.00 .00 30.21 .00 46.79 39.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,300.00 .00 2,514.69 .00 3,785.31 39.9 8140-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8140-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 203,700.00 .00 .00 .00 203,700.00 0.0 11TH PL STREET PARKING IMP 210,000.00 .00 2,514.69 .00 207,485.31 1.2 8158 DEVELOPERS REIMB/14TH ST, ETC. 8158-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8158-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 90,500.00 .00 90,500.00 .00 .00 100.0 STREET SAFETY 300,500.00 .00 93,014.69 .00 207,485.31 31.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,158,389.00 40,800.35 566,116.22 100,591.96 491,680.82 57.6 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 1,158,389.00 40,800.35 566,116.22 100,591.96 491,680.82 57.6 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 110 PARKING FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 15 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1204 FINANCE CASHIER 1204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 239,567.00 19,576.97 198,654.54 .00 40,912.46 82.9 1204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 1204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 9,078.00 .00 1,881.55 .00 7,196.45 20.7 1204-4180 RETIREMENT 17,925.00 1,465.70 14,844.16 .00 3,080.84 82.8 1204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30,515.00 2,569.99 24,366.09 .00 6,148.91 79.8 1204-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,324.00 193.60 1,944.69 .00 379.31 83.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 299,909.00 23,806.26 241,691.03 .00 58,217.97 80.6 1204-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1204-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 45,145.00 1,816.09 8,619.87 .00 36,525.13 19.1 1204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1204-4304 TELEPHONE 1,698.00 176.56 1,399.05 .00 298.95 82.4 1204-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 25,074.00 731.80 15,290.10 40.53 9,743.37 61.1 1204-4315 MEMBERSHIP 175.00 .00 150.00 .00 25.00 85.7 1204-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 4,159.00 .00 2,390.48 .00 1,768.52 57.5 1204-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 24,883.00 2,073.00 20,730.00 .00 4,153.00 83.3 1204-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 8,634.00 720.00 7,200.00 .00 1,434.00 83.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 64,623.00 3,701.36 47,159.63 40.53 17,422.84 73.0 1204-4900 DEPRECIATION 1204-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 850.00 .00 .00 .00 850.00 0.0 1204-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1204-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 300.00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 0.0 1204-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 2,000.00 .00 1,648.56 .00 351.44 82.4 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2,300.00 .00 1,648.56 .00 651.44 71.7 FINANCE CASHIER 412,827.00 29,323.71 299,119.09 40.53 113,667.38 72.5 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 579,630.00 48,303.00 483,030.00 .00 96,600.00 83.3 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 992,457.00 77,626.71 782,149.09 40.53 210,267.38 78.8 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3302-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3302-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 597,053.00 48,797.98 480,518.02 .00 116,534.98 80.5 3302-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 8,000.00 254.16 1,768.19 .00 6,231.81 22.1 3302-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 25,992.00 869.62 15,712.98 .00 10,279.02 60.5 3302-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 11,100.00 483.00 4,168.50 .00 6,931.50 37.6 3302-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 6,000.00 452.79 4,221.27 .00 1,778.73 70.4 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 110 PARKING FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 16 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3302-4118 FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 500.00 .00 408.50 .00 91.50 81.7 3302-4180 RETIREMENT 70,348.00 5,639.83 55,864.30 .00 14,483.70 79.4 3302-4187 UNIFORM EXPENSE 6,880.00 418.34 5,128.35 .00 1,751.65 74.5 3302-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 82,753.00 5,769.43 54,781.32 .00 27,971.68 66.2 3302-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 4,363.00 363.42 3,595.93 .00 767.07 82.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 812,989.00 63,048.57 626,167.36 .00 186,821.64 77.0 3302-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3302-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 12,410.00 711.83 6,339.98 .00 6,070.02 51.1 3302-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 44,100.00 10,735.96 33,832.50 .00 10,267.50 76.7 CONTRACT SERVICES 56,510.00 11,447.79 40,172.48 .00 16,337.52 71.1 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3302-4304 TELEPHONE 3,000.00 359.96 2,650.15 .00 349.85 88.3 3302-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9,500.00 95.83 4,395.23 2,579.92 2,524.85 73.4 3302-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1,600.00 .00 .00 .00 1,600.00 0.0 3302-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 14,151.00 3,511.65 9,166.32 594.94 4,389.74 69.0 3302-4315 MEMBERSHIP 375.00 .00 100.00 .00 275.00 26.7 3302-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 6,550.00 75.50- 2,918.62 .00 3,631.38 44.6 3302-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 8,419.00 702.00 7,020.00 .00 1,399.00 83.4 3302-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 91,365.00 7,614.00 76,140.00 .00 15,225.00 83.3 3302-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 80,305.00 6,692.00 66,920.00 .00 13,385.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 215,265.00 18,899.94 169,310.32 3,174.86 42,779.82 80.1 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION 3302-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 400.00 .00 .00 .00 400.00 0.0 3302-4903 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS 900.00 .00 .00 .00 900.00 0.0 3302-4904 DEPRECIATION/IMPROVMNTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** DEPRECIATION 1,300.00 .00 .00 .00 1,300.00 0.0 3302-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3302-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 900.00 .00 .00 .00 900.00 0.0 3302-5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS 209,805.00 .00 209,356.04 .00 448.96 99.8 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 210,705.00 .00 209,356.04 .00 1,348.96 99.4 3302-5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 3302-5602 IMPRVMTS OTHER THN BLDG 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 0.0 PARKING FACILITIES 1,299,269.00 93,396.30- 1,045,006.20 3,174.86 251,087.94 80.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 2,291,726.00 171,023.01 1,827,155.29 3,215.39 461,355.32 79.9 PARKING FUND 2,291,726.00 171,023.01 1,827,155.29 3,215.39 461,355.32 79.9 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 17 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 375,600.00 31,300.00 313,000.00 .00 62,600.00 83.3 8100 STREET SAFETY 8159 ST IMPRV/HILLCREST & RHODES 8159-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8159-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EXPENDITURE CONTROL 375,600.00 31,300.00 313,000.00 .00 62,600.00 83.3 STATE GAS TAX FUND 375,600.00 31,300.00 313,000.00 .00 62,600.00 83.3 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 117 AB939 FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 18 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 5300 AB939 5301 SOURCE REDCTN/RECYCLE ELEMENT 5301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 5301-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 18,305.00 1,465.50 15,078.13 .00 3,226.87 82.4 5301-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,201.00 .00 319.50 .00 881.50 26.6 5301-4180 RETIREMENT 1,327.00 108.00 1,109.09 .00 217.91 83.6 5301-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,532.00 207.90 2,022.77 .00 509.23 79.9 5301-4189 FICA 269.00 21.74 228.39 .00 40.61 84.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 23,634.00 1,803.14 18,757.88 .00 4,876.12 79.4 5301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 5301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 30,000.00 25.65 1,469.81- .00 31,469.81 4.9- 5301-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 5301-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 AB939 55,134.00 1,828.79 17,288.07 .00 37,845.93 31.4 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 55,134.00 1,828.79 17,288.07 .00 37,845.93 31.4 AB939 FUND 55,134.00 1,828.79 17,288.07 .00 37,845.93 31.4 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 119 COMPENSATED ABSENCES FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 19 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4398 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR OUT 286,578.00 .00 286,578.00 .00 .00 100.0 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 54,741.00 4,562.00 45,620.00 .00 9,121.00 83.3 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 341,319.00 4,562.00 332,198.00 .00 9,121.00 97.3 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 341,319.00 4,562.00 332,198.00 .00 9,121.00 97.3 COMPENSATED ABSENCES FUND 341,319.00 4,562.00 332,198.00 .00 9,121.00 97.3 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 20 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE Y. USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8139 HERMOSA AVE/16TH TO 26TH 8139-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8139-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 28,720.00 .00 25,848.00 2,872.00 .00 100.0 8171 ST IMPROV/ARDMORE & GOULD 8171-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8171-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 18,358.00 .00 16,522.20 1,835.80 .00 100.0 STREET SAFETY 47,078.00 .00 42,370.20 4,707.80 .00 100.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 47,078.00 .00 42,370.20 4,707.80 .00 100.0 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 47,078.00 .00 42,370.20 4,707.80 .00 100.0 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 21 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 19,097.00 2,078.00 16,398.00 .00 2,699.00 85.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 19,097.00 2,078.00 16,398.00 .00 2,699.00 85.9 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 19,097.00 2,078.00 16,398.00 .00 2,699.00 85.9 • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 22 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 6100 PARKS AND RECREATION 6101 PARKS 6101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 6101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,000.00 .00 .00 3,626.00 1,374.00 72.5 8500 PARKS 8507 VALLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS 8507-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8507-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 501,311.00 25.00 3,465.19 2,695.00 495,150.81 1.2 8529 CLARK FIELD IMPROVEMENTS 8529-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8529-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 10,000.00 .00 .00 .00 10,000.00 0.0 8530 VARIOUS PARK IMPROVEMENTS 8530-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8530-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 250.00 .00 248.06 .00 1.94 99.2 8530-4180 RETIREMENT 20.00 .00 18.58 .00 1.42 92.9 8530-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 8530-4189 FICA 4.00 .00 3.60 .00 .40 90.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 274.00 .00 270.24 .00 3.76 98.6 8530-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8530-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 63,363.00 2,065.00 35,783.36 2,284.00 25,295.64 60.1 8530-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8530-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,075.00 709.16 1,992.70 473.85 1,608.45 60.5 8530-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 8530-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 9,600.00 .00 .00 4,465.31 5,134.69 46.5 VARIOUS PARK IMPROVEMENTS 77,312.00 2,774.16 38,046.30 7,223.16 32,042.54 58.6 8531 3RD ST PARK/NEW CONSTRUCTION 8531-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8531-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 94,000.00 .00 7,500.00 .00 86,500.00 8.0 8532 SO PARK HOCKEY RINK IMPROVMNTS 8532-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8532-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 146,000.00 .00 123,148.30 13,679.20 9,172.50 93.7 PARKS 828,623.00 2,799.16 172,159.79 23,597.36 632,865.85 23.6 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8628 COMM CTR COURTYRD IMP/PAINTING 8628-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8628-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 844.00 .00 843.41 .00 .59 99.9 O EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 23 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8628-4180 RETIREMENT 64.00 .00 63.17 .00 .83 98.7 8628-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 166.00 .00 165.98 .00 .02 100.0 8628-4189 FICA 13.00 .00 12.23 .00 .77 94.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 1,087.00 .00 1,084.79 .00 2.21 99.8 8628-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8628-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 66,498.00 1,300.00 2,341.20 1,800.00 62,356.80 6.2 8628-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8628-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1,165.00 .00 1,164.76 .00 .24 100.0 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 68,750.00 1,300.00 4,590.75 1,800.00 62,359.25 9.3 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 902,373.00 4,099.16 176,750.54 29,023.36 696,599.10 22.8 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 902,373.00 4,099.16 176,750.54 29,023.36 696,599.10 22.8 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 24 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 6100 PARKS AND RECREATION 6101 PARKS 6101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 6101-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 13,753.00 .00 13,752.46 .00 .54 100.0 8500 PARKS 8507 VALLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS 8507-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8507-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 450.00 .00 446.51 .00 3.49 99.2 8507-4180 RETIREMENT 35.00 .00 33.44 .00 1.56 95.5 8507-4189 FICA 7.00 .00 6.48 .00 .52 92.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 492.00 .00 486.43 .00 5.57 98.9 8507-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8507-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 304,135.00 .00 3,598.00 22,321.57 278,215.43 8.5 VALLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS 304,627.00 .00 4,084.43 22,321.57 278,221.00 8.7 8529 CLARK FIELD IMPROVEMENTS 8529-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8529-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 10,000.00 .00 .00 .00 10,000.00 0.0 PARKS 314,627.00 .00 4,084.43 22,321.57 288,221.00 8.4 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 328,380.00 .00 17,836.89 22,321.57 288,221.54 12.2 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 328,380.00 .00 17,836.89 22,321.57 288,221.54 12.2 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 25 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 154,031.00 .00 140,987.90 13,043.10 .00 100.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 154,031.00 .00 140,987.90 13,043.10 .00 100.0 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 154,031.00 .00 140,987.90 13,043.10 .00 100.0 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 26 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 136 LOWER PIER ADMIN EXP FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1219 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES 1219-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1219-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,655.00 411.02 1,198.78 .00 456.22 72.4 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 976.00 81.00 811.00 .00 165.00 83.1 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 2,631.00 492.02 2,009.78 .00 621.22 76.4 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 2,631.00 492.02 2,009.78 .00 621.22 76.4 LOWER PIER ADMIN EXP FUND 2,631.00 492.02 2,009.78 .00 621.22 76.4 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 27 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 137 MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1219 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES 1219-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1219-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,717.00 442.81 4,873.96 .00 843.04 85.3 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 2,827.00 236.00 2,355.00 .00 472.00 83.3 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 8,544.00 678.81 7,228.96 .00 1,315.04 84.6 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 8,544.00 678.81 7,228.96 .00 1,315.04 84.6 MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND 8,544.00 678.81 7,228.96 .00 1,315.04 84.6 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 28 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 138 LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1219 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES 1219-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1219-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,957.00 523.92 5,116.77 .00 840.23 85.9 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 3,231.00 269.00 2,693.00 .00 538.00 83.3 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 9,188.00 792.92 7,809.77 .00 1,378.23 85.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 9,188.00 792.92 7,809.77 .00 1,378.23 85.0 LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND 9,188.00 792.92 7,809.77 .00 1,378.23 85.0 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 29 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4700 COMMUNITY DEV BLK GRANT 4706 UTILITY UNDERGROUND ASSISTANCE 4706-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4706-4102 REGULAR SALARIES .00 .00 245.98 .00 245.98- 4706-4180 RETIREMENT .00 .00 22.82 .00 22.82- 4706-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 .00 41.51 .00 41.51- 4706-4189 FICA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 PERSONAL SERVICES .00 .00 310.31 .00 310.31- *** *** *** *** *** 4706-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4706-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 9,000.00 1,001.18 3,701.18 .00 5,298.82 41.1 UTILITY UNDERGROUND ASSISTANCE 9,000.00 1,001.18 4,011.49 .00 4,988.51 44.6 4707 CDBG PROGRAM GENERAL ADMIN 4707-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4707-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 10,485.00 .00 834.76 .00 9,650.24 8.0 4707-4180 RETIREMENT 785.00 .00 85.25 .00 699.75 10.9 4707-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 984.00 .00 68.94 .00 915.06 7.0 4707-4189 FICA 152.00 .00 .00 .00 152.00 0.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 12,406.00 .00 988.95 .00 11,417.05 8.0 4707-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4707-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 2,000.00 .00 70.20 .00 1,929.80 3.5 CDBG PROGRAM GENERAL ADMIN 14,406.00 .00 1,059.15 .00 13,346.85 7.4 COMMUNITY DEV BLK GRANT 23,406.00 1,001.18 5,070.64 .00 18,335.36 21.7 8100 STREET SAFETY 8147 CURB-CUT/HANDICAP RAMPS 8147-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8147-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 100,000.00 .00 .00 .00 100,000.00 0.0 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8622-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 11,235.00 1,046.61 3,498.17 .00 7,736.83 31.1 8622-4180 RETIREMENT 842.00 101.18 303.33 .00 538.67 36.0 8622-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,249.00 232.81 603.09 .00 1,645.91 26.8 8622-4189 FICA 112.00 19.63 34.25 .00 77.75 30.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 14,438.00 1,400.23 4,438.84 .00 9,999.16 30.7 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 459,358.00 .00 153,935.84 272,250.16 33,172.00 92.8 8622-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8622-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 473,796.00 1,400.23 158,374.68 272,250.16 43,171.16 90.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 597,202.00 2,401.41 163,445.32 272,250.16 161,506.52 73.0 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 597,202.00 2,401.41 163,445.32 272,250.16 161,506.52 73.0 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 30 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3400 PUBLIC TRANSIT 3401 DIAL A RIDE 3401-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3401-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 29,982.00 2,413.56 23,430.68 .00 6,551.32 78.1 3401-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3401-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 173,238.00 .00 101,598.20 .00 71,639.80 58.6 3401-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3401-4304 TELEPHONE 50.00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 0.0 3401-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 800.00 104.04 104.04 .00 695.96 13.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 850.00 104.04 104.04 .00 745.96 12.2 DIAL A RIDE 204,070.00 2,517.60 125,132.92 .00 78,937.08 61.3 3403 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 3403-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3403-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 375.00 43.29 279.59 .00 95.41 74.6 3403-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3403-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 2,500.00 76.00 1,252.00 .00 1,248.00 50.1 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 2,875.00 119.29 1,531.59 .00 1,343.41 53.3 3404 DIAL -A -TAXI PROGRAM 3404-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3404-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 0.0 3404-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3404-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 25,000.00 .00 .00 .00 25,000.00 0.0 DIAL -A -TAXI PROGRAM 27,500.00 .00 .00 .00 27,500.00 0.0 3408 COMMUTER EXPRESS 3408-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3408-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,008.00 93.36 972.06 .00 35.94 96.4 3408-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3408-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 5,604.00 .00 .00 .00 5,604.00 0.0 COMMUTER EXPRESS 6,612.00 93.36 972.06 .00 5,639.94 14.7 3409 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 3409-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3409-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 2,000.00 234.87 917.73 .00 1,082.27 45.9 3409-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3409-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 21,400.00 1,910.25 11,769.35 .00 9,630.65 55.0 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 23,400.00 2,145.12 12,687.08 .00 10,712.92 54.2 PUBLIC TRANSIT 264,457.00 4,875.37 140,323.65 .00 124,133.35 53.1 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 264,457.00 4,875.37 140,323.65 .00 124,133.35 53.1 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 264,457.00 4,875.37 140,323.65 .00 124,133.35 53.1 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 31 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8139 HERMOSA AVE/16TH TO 26TH 8139-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8139-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 191,133.00 .00 77,731.41 26,557.52 86,844.07 54.6 8168 HERMOSA AVE/27TH TO BOUNDARY 8168-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8168-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 9,000.00 3,489.41 5,442.90 .00 3,557.10 60.5 8168-4180 RETIREMENT 675.00 261.36 407.68 .00 267.32 60.4 8168-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,400.00 615.74 1,233.87 .00 166.13 88.1 8168-4189 FICA 131.00 50.60 78.93 .00 52.07 60.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 11,206.00 4,417.11 7,163.38 .00 4,042.62 63.9 8168-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8168-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 570,421.00 .00 290,135.30 92,046.84 188,238.86 67.0 HERMOSA AVE/27TH TO BOUNDARY 581,627.00 4,417.11 297,298.68 92,046.84 192,281.48 66.9 STREET SAFETY 772,760.00 4,417.11 375,030.09 118,604.36 279,125.55 63.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 772,760.00 4,417.11 375,030.09 118,604.36 279,125.55 63.9 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 772,760.00 4,417.11 375,030.09 118,604.36 279,125.55 63.9 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 32 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 150 GRANTS FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 9,240.00 .00 9,238.71 .00 1.29 100.0 2100 POLICE 2110 BCHD DOM VIOLENCE ADVOCACY PGM 2110-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2110-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,869.00 118.35 1,183.51 .00 685.49 63.3 2110-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 9.22 50.70 .00 50.70- *** 2110-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN .00 .00 109.41 .00 109.41- *** 2110-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 7,720.00 .00 .00 .00 7,720.00 0.0 2110-4180 RETIREMENT 138.00 8.95 91.38 .00 46.62 66.2 2110-4187 UNIFORMS 18.00 1.20 12.00 .00 6.00 66.7 2110-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 258.00 16.80 155.85 .00 102.15 60.4 2110-4189 FICA 617.00 .00 .00 .00 617.00 0.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 10,620.00 154.52 1,602.85 .00 9,017.15 15.1 2110-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2110-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,565.00 250.00 250.00 .00 1,315.00 16.0 2110-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2110-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2,815.00 .00 .00 .00 2,815.00 0.0 POLICE 15,000.00 404.52 1,852.85 .00 13,147.15 12.4 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3102 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 3102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,646.00 .00 .00 5,646.00 .00 100.0 4100 PLANNING 4104 COASTAL PERMIT AUTH GRANT 4104-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4104-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 2,551.00 .00 .00 .00 2,551.00 0.0 4104-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4104-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,615.00 .00 1,524.64 .00 90.36 94.4 4104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4104-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES 304.00 .00 .00 .00 304.00 0.0 PLANNING 4,470.00 .00 1,524.64 .00 2,945.36 34.1 8100 STREET SAFETY 8139 HERMOSA AVE/16TH TO 26TH 8139-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 150 GRANTS FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 33 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8139-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 327,316.00 .00 231,866.48 40,173.83 55,275.69 83.1 8171 ST IMPROV/ARDMORE & GOULD 8171-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8171-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 110,000.00 .00 99,000.00 15,326.69 4,326.69- 103.9 STREET SAFETY 437,316.00 .00 330,866.48 55,500.52 50,949.00 88.3 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8628 COMM CTR COURTYRD IMP/PAINTING 8628-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8628-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 246,250.00 .00 62,075.93 76,424.79 107,749.28 56.2 8630 PIER RENOVATION/PHASE III 8630-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8630-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 55,000.00 .00 .00 .00 55,000.00 0.0 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 301,250.00 .00 62,075.93 76,424.79 162,749.28 46.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 772,922.00 404.52 405,558.61 137,571.31 229,792.08 70.3 GRANTS FUND 772,922.00 404.52 405,558.61 137,571.31 229,792.08 70.3 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 34 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3701 EMISSION CONTROL 3701-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3701-4327 AQMD INCENTIVES 1,500.00 35.00 640.00 .00 860.00 42.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,500.00 35.00 640.00 .00 860.00 42.7 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 1,500.00 35.00 640.00 .00 860.00 42.7 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 35 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2100 POLICE 2106 C.O.P.S. PROGRAM 2106-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2106-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 11,852.00 109.31 11,960.66 .00 108.66- 100.9 2106-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 7,774.00 .00 7,773.44 .00 .56 100.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 19,626.00 109.31 19,734.10 .00 108.10- 100.6 2106-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2106-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 20,867.00 1,089.04 9,800.70 4,870.76 6,195.54 70.3 2106-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 90,764.00 2,343.89 7,540.29 17,716.80 65,506.91 27.8 2106-5403 VEHICLES 34,800.00 .00 18,325.44 341.45 16,133.11 53.6 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 146,431.00 3,432.93 35,666.43 22,929.01 87,835.56 40.0 2106-5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 2106-5602 IMPRVMNTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 8,286.00 126.36 6,632.96 480.94 1,172.10 85.9 POLICE 174,343.00 3,668.60 62,033.49 23,409.95 88,899.56 49.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 174,343.00 3,668.60 62,033.49 23,409.95 88,899.56 49.0 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 174,343.00 3,668.60 62,033.49 23,409.95 88,899.56 49.0 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 36 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 154 CA LAW ENF EQUIP PROG (CLEEP) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2100 POLICE 2107 HIGH TECHNOLOGY GRANT 2107-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2107-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 142,618.00 30,400.00 42,001.00 62,033.38 38,583.62 72.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 142,618.00 30,400.00 42,001.00 62,033.38 38,583.62 72.9 CA LAW ENF EQUIP PROG (CLEEP) 142,618.00 30,400.00 42,001.00 62,033.38 38,583.62 72.9 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 160 SEWER FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 37 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3102 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 3102-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3102-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 208,793.00' 16,511.03 168,092.25 .00 40,700.75 80.5 3102-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4,800.00 421.43 2,270.32 .00 2,529.68 47.3 3102-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,645.00 311.80 3,480.46 .00 164.54 95.5 3102-4180 RETIREMENT 15,325.00 1,218.28 12,539.74 .00 2,785.26 81.8 3102-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 29,064.00 2,234.78 24,055.88 .00 5,008.12 82.8 3102-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,353.00 184.56 1,952.35 .00 400.65 83.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 263,980.00 20,881.88 212,391.00 .00 51,589.00 80.5 3102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 156,270.00 3,234.65 102,631.94 41,079.78 12,558.28 92.0 3102-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOV'T 3,900.00 .00 .00 500.00 3,400.00 12.8 CONTRACT SERVICES 160,170.00 3,234.65 102,631.94 41,579.78 15,958.28 90.0 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3102-4303 UTILITIES 2,183.00 144.06 1,981.27 .00 201.73 90.8 3102-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 12,600.00 3,055.27 4,712.47 2,516.37 5,371.16 57.4 3102-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 33,673.00 2,806.00 28,060.00 .00 5,613.00 83.3 3102-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 51,531.00 4,294.00 42,940.00 .00 8,591.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 99,987.00 10,299.33 77,693.74 2,516.37 19,776.89 80.2 3102-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3102-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 5,100.00 .00 4,968.00 .00 132.00 97.4 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 529,237.00 34,415.86 397,684.68 44,096.15 87,456.17 83.5 3105 USED OIL BLOCK GRANT 3105-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3105-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,797.00 .00 .00 5,709.00 88.00 98.5 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 535,034.00 34,415.86 397,684.68 49,805.15 87,544.17 83.6 8100 STREET SAFETY 8144 HERMOSA BEACH BIKE PATH 8144-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8144-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 550.00 .00 550.00 .00 .00 100.0 8192 VARIOUS STREET IMPROVEMENTS 8192-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8192-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 90,750.00 .00 .00 .00 90,750.00 0.0 STREET SAFETY 91,300.00 .00 550.00 .00 90,750.00 0.6 8400 SANITARY SEWER 8409 MANHOLE REPAIRS 8409-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 160 SEWER FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 38 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8409-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 150,000.00 .00 .00 8,245.00 141,755.00 5.5 8410 SEWER REHAB/LOMA DISTRICT 8410-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8410-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 13,663.00 1,215.55 4,899.20 .00 8,763.80 35.9 8410-4180 RETIREMENT 1,023.00 107.44 386.20 .00 636.80 37.8 8410-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,282.00 110.28 542.11 .00 739.89 42.3 8410-4189 FICA 198.00 20.80 74.77 .00 123.23 37.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 16,166.00 1,454.07 5,902.28 .00 10,263.72 36.5 8410-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8410-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 71,743.00 .00 .00 15,193.00 56,550.00 21.2 SEWER REHAB/LOMA DISTRICT 87,909.00 1,454.07 5,902.28 15,193.00 66,813.72 24.0 8411 SEWER REHAB/RECONS-TRGT AREA 1 8411-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8411-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 20,765.00 1,215.55 5,446.20 .00 15,318.80 26.2 8411-4180 RETIREMENT 1,556.00 101.97 424.97 .00 1,131.03 27.3 8411-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,947.00 73.52 456.34 .00 1,490.66 23.4 8411-4189 FICA 301.00 19.74 82.29 .00 218.71 27.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 24,569.00 1,410.78 6,409.80 .00 18,159.20 26.1 8411-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8411-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 50,000.00 6,300.46 17,026.84 1,736.09 31,237.07 37.5 SEWER REHAB/RECONS-TRGT AREA 1 74,569.00 7,711.24 23,436.64 1,736.09 49,396.27 33.8 8412 SEWER REHAB/RECONS-TRGT AREA 2 8412-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8412-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 18,118.00 972.44 4,206.34 .00 13,911.66 23.2 8412-4180 RETIREMENT 1,357.00 83.75 356.13 .00 1,000.87 26.2 8412-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,699.00 73.52 431.32 .00 1,267.68 25.4 8412-4189 FICA 263.00 16.21 68.96 .00 194.04 26.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 21,437.00 1,145.92 5,062.75 .00 16,374.25 23.6 8412-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8412-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 50,000.00 2,560.00 11,412.00 4,408.00 34,180.00 31.6 SEWER REHAB/RECONS-TRGT AREA 2 71,437.00 3,705.92 16,474.75 4,408.00 50,554.25 29.2 8413 SEWER REHAB/RECONS-TRGT AREA 3 8413-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8413-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,760.00 .00 583.47 .00 1,176.53 33.2 8413-4180 RETIREMENT 132.00 .00 48.88 .00 83.12 37.0 8413-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 164.00 .00 79.64 .00 84.36 48.6 8413-4189 FICA 26.00 .00 9.45 .00 16.55 36.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 2,082.00 .00 721.44 .00 1,360.56 34.7 8413-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 160 SEWER FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 39 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8413-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 45,000.00 643.50 5,083.50 4,147.50 35,769.00 20.5 SEWER REHAB/RECONS-TRGT AREA 3 47,082.00 643.50 5,804.94 4,147.50 37,129.56 21.1 8414 SEWER REHAB/RECONS-TRGT AREA 4 8414-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8414-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,022.00 .00 352.51 .00 669.49 34.5 8414-4180 RETIREMENT 77.00 .00 31.86 .00 45.14 41.4 8414-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 96.00 .00 47.23 .00 48.77 49.2 8414-4189 FICA 15.00 .00 6.17 .00 8.83 41.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 1,210.00 .00 437.77 .00 772.23 36.2 8414-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8414-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 39,120.00 829.00 5,493.00 2,526.69 31,100.31 20.5 SEWER REHAB/RECONS-TRGT AREA 4 40,330.00 829.00 5,930.77 2,526.69 31,872.54 21.0 SANITARY SEWER 471,327.00 14,343.73 57,549.38 36,256.28 377,521.34 19.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,097,661.00 48,759.59 455,784.06 86,061.43 555,815.51 49.4 SEWER FUND 1,097,661.00 48,759.59 455,784.06 86,061.43 555,815.51 49.4 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 40 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 96,269.00 8,023.00 80,228.00 .00 16,041.00 83.3 2200 FIRE 2202 FIRE PROTECTION 2202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 47,780.00 19,121.63 20,206.00 3,194.67 24,379.33 49.0 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8610 FIRE STA UPSTAIRS REMODEL/ADDN 8610-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8610-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 432,810.00 .00 29,645.10 .00 403,164.90 6.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 576,859.00 27,144.63 130,079.10 3,194.67 443,585.23 23.1 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 576,859.00 27,144.63 130,079.10 3,194.67 443,585.23 23.1 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 41 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 3104-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3104-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 12,000.00 .00 .00 .00 12,000.00 0.0 8100 STREET SAFETY 8104 BAYVIEW DR UNDERGROUND DIST 8104-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8104-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 30,000.00 .00 .00 .00 30,000.00 0.0 8105 BONNIE BRAE UNDERGROUND DIST 8105-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8105-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 50,000.00 .00 .00 .00 50,000.00 0.0 8106 BEACH DRIVE UNDERGROUND DIST 8106-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8106-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 15,000.00 .00 15,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 8107 TRAFF SIGNAL/ARDMORE & 16TH ST 8107-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8107-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 75,000.00 .00 .00 .00 75,000.00 0.0 8139 HERMOSA AVE/16TH TO 26TH 8139-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8139-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,264.00 .00 1,200.62 .00 63.38 95.0 8139-4180 RETIREMENT 95.00 .00 89.93 .00 5.07 94.7 8139-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 123.00 .00 122.94 .00 .06 100.0 8139-4189 FICA 18.00 .00 17.42 .00 .58 96.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 1,500.00 .00 1,430.91 .00 69.09 95.4 8139-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8139-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 78,500.00 .00 57,848.14 9,846.86 10,805.00 86.2 HERMOSA AVE/16TH TO 26TH 80,000.00 .00 59,279.05 9,846.86 10,874.09 86.4 8154 15TH ST IMPROV/HERM AVE -BCH DR 8154-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8154-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,000.00 .00 .00 1,980.00 18,020.00 9.9 8159 ST IMPRV/HILLCREST & RHODES 8159-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8159-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 18,793.00 .00 18,015.28 .00 777.72 95.9 8159-4180 RETIREMENT 1,406.00 .00 1,349.36 .00 56.64 96.0 8159-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,844.00 .00 2,773.40 .00 70.60 97.5 8159-4189 FICA 276.00 .00 261.26 .00 14.74 94.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 23,319.00 .00 22,399.30 .00 919.70 96.1 8159-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 42 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8159-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 205,161.00 .00 20,300.00 16,660.00 168,201.00 18.0 ST IMPRV/HILLCREST & RHODES 228,480.00 .00 42,699.30 16,660.00 169;120.70 26.0 8164 VARIOUS ST IMPROVEMENTS #2 8164-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8164-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 154,450.00 .00 .00 53,440.00 101,010.00 34.6 8166 SLURRY SEALING/EAST OF PCH 8166-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8166-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 120,600.00 .00 7,020.00 .00 113,580.00 5.8 8167 VARIOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPR 8167-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8167-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 100,000.00 .00 .00 .00 100,000.00 0.0 8171 ST IMPROV/ARDMORE & GOULD 8171-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8171-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 18,426.00 .00 17,771.30 .00 654.70 96.4 8171-4180 RETIREMENT 1,380.00 .00 1,342.45 .00 37.55 97.3 8171-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,610.00 .00 683.74 .00 926.26 42.5 8171-4189 FICA 268.00 .00 259.92 .00 8.08 97.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 21,684.00 .00 20,057.41 .00 1,626.59 92.5 8171-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8171-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 150,000.00 .00 117,287.95 14,440.35- 47,152.40 68.6 ST IMPROV/ARDMORE & GOULD 171,684.00 .00 137,345.36 14,440.35- 48,778.99 71.6 8172 21ST ST IMP/VALLEY TO POWER ST 8172-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8172-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,720.00 .00 1,711.63 .00 8.37 99.5 8172-4180 RETIREMENT 130.00 .00 128.20 .00 1.80 98.6 8172-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 280.00 _ .00 276.64 .00 3.36 98.8 8172-4189 FICA 26.00 .00 24.82 .00 1.18 95.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 2,156.00 .00 2,141.29 .00 14.71 99.3 8172-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8172-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 177,425.00 .00 11,307.50 4,253.67 161,863.83 8.8 21ST ST IMP/VALLEY TO POWER ST 179,581.00 .00 13,448.79 4,253.67 161,878.54 9.9 8183 UTIL UNDRGRND/LOMA DR 8183-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8183-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 17,000.00 4,950.00 14,107.97 .00 2,892.03 83.0 8191 14TH ST LANDSCAPED PLANTERS 8191-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8191-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 36,000.00 .00 8,744.00 .00 27,256.00 24.3 8192 VARIOUS STREET IMPROVEMENTS 8192-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 43 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8192-4102, REGULAR SALARIES 23,188.00 972.46 9,810.51 .00 13,377.49 42.3 8192-4180 RETIREMENT 1,737.00 83.76 748.58 .00 988.42 43.1 8192-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,175.00 73.52 835.91 .00 1,339.09 38.4 8192-4189 FICA 336.00 16.21 144.93 .00 191.07 43.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 27,436.00 1,145.95 11,539.93 .00 15,896.07 42.1 8192-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8192-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 15,000.00 .00 .00 .00 15,000.00 0.0 VARIOUS STREET IMPROVEMENTS 42,436.00 1,145.95 11,539.93 .00 30,896.07 27.2 STREET SAFETY 1,320,231.00 6,095.95 309,184.40 71,740.18 939,306.42 28.9 8400 SANITARY SEWER 8410 SEWER REHAB/LOMA DISTRICT 8410-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8410-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 45,000.00 .00 120.42 24,394.07 20,485.51 54.5 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 684,562.00 .00 .00 622,274.00 62,288.00 90.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 2,061,793.00 6,095.95 309,304.82 718,408.25 1,034,079.93 49.8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 2,061,793.00 6,095.95 309,304.82 718,408.25 1,034,079.93 49.8 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 302 ARTESIA BLVD RELINQUISHMENT • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 44 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED, APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8174 ARTESIA BLVD REHABILITATION 8174-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8174-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 491,120.00 .00 12,180.00 .00 478,940.00 2.5 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 491,120.00 .00 12,180.00 .00 478,940.00 2.5 ARTESIA BLVD RELINQUISHMENT 491,120.00 .00 12,180.00 .00 478,940.00 2.5 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 45 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8182 UTIL UNDRGRND/MYRTLE AVE 8182-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8182-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 4,995.00 .00 4,995.00 .00 .00 100.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 4,995.00 .00 4,995.00 .00 .00 100.0 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND 4,995.00 .00 4,995.00 .00 .00 100.0 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 46 05/21/02 15:04:56 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 308 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8183 UTIL UNDRGRND/LOMA DR 8183-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8183-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 73,185.00 6,664.00 50,483.50 22,701.00 .50 100.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 73,185.00 6,664.00 50,483.50 22,701.00 .50 100.0 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND 73,185.00 6,664.00 50,483.50 22,701.00 .50 100.0 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 705 INSURANCE FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 47 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1209 LIABILITY INSURANCE 1209-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1209-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 35,990.00 2,873.72 30,832.92 .00 5,157.08 85.7 1209-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,977.00 .00 403.03 .00 1,573.97 20.4 1209-4180 RETIREMENT 2,617.00 208.63 2,243.75 .00 373.25 85.7 1209-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,560.00 441.78 4,350.35 .00 1,209.65 78.2 1209-4189 FICA 545.00 42.91 466.04 .00 78.96 85.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 46,689.00 3,567.04 38,296.09 .00 8,392.91 82.0 1209-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1209-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 202,460.00 .00 199,981.50 .00 2,478.50 98.8 1209-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1209-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 5.70 80.63 .00 419.37 16.1 1209-4315 MEMBERSHIP 345.00 .00 155.00 .00 190.00 44.9 1209-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 4,400.00 .00 908.49 .00 3,491.51 20.6 1209-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 350,000.00 60,891.09 174,861.08 .00 175,138.92 50.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 355,245.00 60,896.79 176,005.20 .00 179,239.80 49.5 LIABILITY INSURANCE 604,394.00 64,463.83 414,282.79 .00 190,111.21 68.5 1210 AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 1210-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1210-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 25,500.00 .00 24,721.00 .00 779.00 96.9 1210-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1210-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 10,000.00 .00 .00 .00 10,000.00 0.0 AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 35,500.00 .00 24,721.00 .00 10,779.00 69.6 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT 1215-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1215-4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 10,000.00 .00 4,295.00 .00 5,705.00 43.0 1217 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 1217-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1217-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 35,990.00 2,873.75 30,833.43 .00 5,156.57 85.7 1217-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,977.00 .00 403.04 .00 1,573.96 20.4 1217-4180 RETIREMENT 2,617.00 208.75 2,244.04 .00 372.96 85.7 1217-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,560.00 441.94 4,351.21 .00 1,208.79 78.3 1217-4189 FICA 545.00 42.91 466.25 .00 78.75 85.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 46,689.00 3,567.35 38,297.97 .00 8,391.03 82.0 1217-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1217-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 41,300.00 .00 37,547.00 .00 3,753.00 90.9 1217-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 5,000.00 .00 2,409.02 .00 2,590.98 48.2 CONTRACT SERVICES 46,300.00 .00 39,956.02 .00 6,343.98 86.3 1217-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 705 INSURANCE FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 48 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1217-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 3.64 10.92 .00 489.08 2.2 1217-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 0.0 1217-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 500,000.00 41,899.45 593,818.38 .00 93,818.38- 118.8 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 503,000.00 41,903.09 593,829.30 .00 90,829.30- 118.1 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 595,989.00 45,470.44 672,083.29 .00 76,094.29- 112.8 1220 LEGAL SETTLEMENTS 1220-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1220-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 165,000.00 .00 165,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1,410,883.00 109,934.27 1,280,382.08 .00 130,500.92 90.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,410,883.00 109,934.27 1,280,382.08 .00 130,500.92 90.8 INSURANCE FUND 1,410,883.00 109,934.27 1,280,382.08 .00 130,500.92 90.8 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 49 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE/LEGAL 1121 CITY CLERK 1121-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1121-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1,950.00 .00 .00 .00 1,950.00 0.0 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 275.00 .00 42.42 .00 232.58 15.4 1202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 400.00 .00 24.75 .00 375.25 6.2 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 675.00 .00 67.17 .00 607.83 10.0 1202-4900 DEPRECIATION 1202-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 2,719.00 .00 .00 .00 2,719.00 0.0 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 3,394.00 .00 67.17 .00 3,326.83 2.0 1206 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1206-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1206-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 61,803.00 4,347.00 40,068.00 .00 21,735.00 64.8 1206-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,265.00 .00 1,232.14 .00 32.86 97.4 1206-4180 RETIREMENT 4,629.00 304.30 2,804.78 .00 1,824.22 60.6 1206-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,929.00 367.29 3,271.32 .00 2,657.68 55.2 1206-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 896.00 63.04 598.94 .00 297.06 66.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 74,522.00 5,081.63 47,975.18 .00 26,546.82 64.4 1206-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1206-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 172,108.00 8,209.64 86,708.63 20,410.12 64,989.25 62.2 1206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1206-4304 TELEPHONE 6,963.00 682.55 3,507.98 .00 3,455.02 50.4 1206-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 3,600.00 11.94 3,794.52 .00 194.52- 105.4 1206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,019.00 531.08 2,419.63 .00 1,599.37 60.2 1206-4315 MEMBERSHIP 120.00 .00 120.00 .00 .00 100.0 1206-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,562.00 .00 .00 .00 3,562.00 0.0 1206-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,801.00 150.00 1,500.00 .00 301.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 20,065.00 1,375.57 11,342.13 .00 8,722.87 56.5 1206-4900 DEPRECIATION 1206-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIPMENT 87,065.00 .00 .00 .00 87,065.00 0.0 1206-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1206-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 11,483.00 .00 2,979.09 .00 8,503.91 25.9 1206-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 144,408.00 .00 41,047.37 3,974.94 99,385.69 31.2 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 155,891.00 .00 44,026.46 3,974.94 107,889.60 30.8 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 509,651.00 14,666.84 190,052.40 24,385.06 295,213.54 42.1 1208 1208-4900 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS DEPRECIATION EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 50 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1208-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIPMENT 1,189.00 .00 .00 .00 1,189.00 0.0 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 514,234.00 14,666.84 190,119.57 24,385.06 299,729.37 41.7 2100 POLICE 2101 POLICE • 2101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2101-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 28,000.00 2,528.75 21,380.43 .00 6,619.57 76.4 2101-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 35,000.00 4,632.64 29,355.77 495.34 5,148.89 85.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 63,000.00 7,161.39 50,736.20 495.34 11,768.46 81.3 2101-4900 DEPRECIATION 2101-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIPMENT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 2101-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 141,066.00 .00 .00 .00 141,066.00 0.0 DEPRECIATION 141,066.00 .00 .00 .00 141,066.00 0.0 2101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2101-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 27,760.00 434.19 24,261.15 .00 3,498.85 87.4 2101-5403 VEHICLES 117,652.00 .00 102,170.72 14,798.42 682.86 99.4 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 145,412.00 434.19 126,431.87 14,798.42 4,181.71 97.1 POLICE 349,478.00 7,595.58 177,168.07 15,293.76 157,016.17 55.1 2200 FIRE 2201 FIRE 2201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2201-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 25,253.00 .00 .00 .00 25,253.00 0.0 2201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 9,677.00 771.73 4,253.81 .00 5,423.19 44.0 2201-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 8,974.00 373.17 5,518.14 .00 3,455.86. 61.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 18,651.00 1,144.90 9,771.95 .00 8,879.05 52.4 2201-4900 DEPRECIATION 2201-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIPMENT 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 0.0 2201-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 79,502.00 .00 .00 .00 79,502.00 0.0 DEPRECIATION 79,602.00 .00 .00 .00 79,602.00 0.0 2201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2201-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 1,800.00 .00 .00 .00 1,800.00 0.0 2201-5403 VEHICLES 36,171.00 692.63 1,147.13 723.15 34,300.72 5.2 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 37,971.00 692.63 1,147.13 723.15 36,100.72 4.9 FIRE 161,477.00 1,837.53 10,919.08 723.15 149,834.77 7.2 2600 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 2601 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2,200.00 235.57 1,752.89 .00 447.11 79.7 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 51 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,560.00 719.58 2,107.84 2.11 549.95- 135.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3,760.00 955.15 3,860.73 '2.11 102.84- 102.7 2601-4900 DEPRECIATION 2601-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 21,716.00 .00 .00 .00 21,716.00 0.0 2601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2601-5403 VEHICLES 151,165.00 124,776.53 151,164.17 .00 .83 100.0 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 176,641.00 125,731.68 155,024.90 2.11 21,613.99 87.8 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3102 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 3102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 2,835.00 .00 .00 999.00 1,836.00 35.2 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3102-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2,500.00 .00 2,323.47 .00 176.53 92.9 3102-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,800.00 128.01 950.02 .00 849.98 52.8 3102-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,444.00 9.82 639.46 .00 804.54 44.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 5,744.00 137.83 3,912.95 .00 1,831.05 68.1 3102-4900 DEPRECIATION 3102-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 22,015.00 .00 .00 .00 22,015.00 0.0 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 30,594.00 137.83 3,912.95 999.00 25,682.05 16.1 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 3104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3104-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2,200.00 312.91 2,568.40 .00 368.40- 116.7 3104-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,000.00 216.92 2,102.71 .00 102.71- 105.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4,200.00 529.83 4,671.11 .00 471.11- 111.2 3104-4900 DEPRECIATION 3104-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 4,698.00 .00 .00 .00 4,698.00 0.0 3104-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3104-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 15,000.00 .00 .00 .00 15,000.00 0.0 TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 23,898.00 529.83 4,671.11 .00 19,226.89 19.5 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 54,492.00 667.66 8,584.06 999.00 44,908.94 17.6 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3302-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 5,000.00 507.15 3,611.66 .00 1,388.34 72.2 3302-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 13,000.00 549.35 7,633.34 .00 5,366.66 58.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 18,000.00 1,056.50 11,245.00 .00 6,755.00 62.5 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 52 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3302-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 22,500.00 .00 .00 .00 22,500.00 0.0 PARKING FACILITIES 40,500.00 1,056.50 11,245.00 .00 29,255.00 27.8 4200 CONST/ENG/ENF 4201 COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 4201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,000.00 123.95 954.50 .00 45.50 95.5 4201-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,100.00 10.85 246.21 .00 853.79 22.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2,100.00 134.80 1,200.71 .00 899.29 57.2 4201-4900 DEPRECIATION 4201-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 6,385.00 .00 .00 .00 6,385.00 0.0 COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 8,485.00 134.80 1,200.71 .00 7,284.29 14.2 4202 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,200.00 92.40 632.29 .00 567.71 52.7 4202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,500.00 17.80 562.72 .00 937.28 37.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2,700.00 110.20 1,195.01 .00 1,504.99 44.3 4202-4900 DEPRECIATION 4202-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 6,243.00 .00 .00 .00 6,243.00 0.0 4202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 9,943.00 110.20 1,195.01 .00 8,747.99 12.0 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 700.00 22.37 158.45 .00 541.55 22.6 4204-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,000.00 .00 7.04 .00 992.96 0.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,700.00 22.37 165.49 .00 1,534.51 9.7 4204-4900 DEPRECIATION 4204-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 3,475.00 .00 .00 .00 3,475.00 0.0 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,175.00 22.37 165.49 .00 5,009.51 3.2 4206 EQUIPMENT SERVICE 4206-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4206-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 96,451.00 9,083.78 80,118.52 .00 16,332.48 83.1 4206-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,800.00 .00 1,519.65 .00 280.35 84.4 4206-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,306.00 31.29 3,089.78 .00 783.78- 134.0 4206-4180 RETIREMENT 7,225.00 684.15 6,018.47 .00 1,206.53 83.3 4206-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 9,541.00 804.35 7,681.62 .00 1,859.38. 80.5 4206-4189 FICA 560.00 61.91 475.50 .00 84.50 84.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 117,883.00 10,665.48 98,903.54 .00 18,979.46 83.9 4206-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 53 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4206-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 2,500.00 193.77 947.80 .00 1,552.20 37.9 4206-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 350.00 .00 .00 .00 350.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 2,850.00 193.77 947.80 .00 1,902.20 33.3 4206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3,000.00 224.54 3,201.33 .00 201.33- 106.7 4206-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,600.00 .00 732.81 .00 867.19 45.8 4206-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE ' 1,100.00 55.07 609.50 .00 490.50 55.4 4206-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 15,481.00 1,290.00 12,900.00 .00 2,581.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 21,181.00 1,569.61 17,443.64 .00 3,737.36 82.4 4206-4900 DEPRECIATION 4206-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIPMENT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 4206-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4206-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 528.00 .00 372.55 .00 155.45 70.6 4206-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 6,372.00 .00 2,389.95 .00 3,982.05 37.5 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 6,900.00 .00 2,762.50 .00 4,137.50 40.0 EQUIPMENT SERVICE 148,814.00 12,428.86 120,057.48 .00 28,756.52 80.7 CONST/ENG/ENF 172,417.00 12,696.23 122,618.69 .00 49,798.31 71.1 4600 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 800.00 37.21 458.83 .00 341.17 57.4 4601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,586.00 30.63 2,218.37 .00 367.63 85.8 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3,386.00 67.84 2,677.20 .00 708.80 79.1 4601-4900 DEPRECIATION 4601-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 7,973.00 .00 .00 .00 7,973.00 0.0 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 11,359.00 67.84 2,677.20 .00 8,681.80 23.6 6100 PARKS AND RECREATION 6101 PARKS 6101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 6101-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,800.00 153.39 1,354.40 .00 445.60 75.2 6101-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 860.00 .00 103.73 .00 756.27 12.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2,660.00 153.39 1,458.13 .00 1,201.87 54.8 6101-4900 DEPRECIATION 6101-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 7,263.00 .00 .00 .00 7,263.00 0.0 PARKS AND RECREATION 9,923.00 153.39 1,458.13 .00 8,464.87 14.7 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 54 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 594,478.00 .00 316,294.75 175,145.08 103,038.17 82.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 2,086,949.00 164,473.25 996,109.45 216,548.16 874,291.39 58.1 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 2,086,949.00 164,473.25 996,109.45 216,548.16 874,291.39 58.1 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 55 ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND EXPENDITURE CONTROL 35,838,339.00 2,062,529.60 22,580,667.75 2,504,284.47 10,753,386.78 70.0 GRAND TOTALS 35,838,339.00 2,062,529.60 22,580,667.75 2,504,284.47 10,753,386.78 70.0 EXPPRIN2 05/21/02 15:04:56 DESCRIPTION • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE RECAP REPORT APRIL 2002 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 56 ADJUSTED APRIL 2001-02 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 001 GENERAL FUND 19,018,646.00 1,350,411.19 14,241,019.18 668,573.62 4,109,053.20 78.4 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 596,956.00 45,189.65 444,148.78 2,025.00 150,782.22 74.7 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 1,158,389.00 40,800.35 566,116.22 100,591.96 491,680.82 57.6 110 PARKING FUND 2,291,726.00 171,023.01 1,827,155.29 3,215.39 461,355.32 79.9 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 375,600.00 31,300.00 313,000.00 .00 62,600.00 83.3 117 AB939 FUND 55,134.00 1,828.79 17,288.07 .00 37,845.93 31.4 119 COMPENSATED ABSENCES FUND 341,319.00 4,562.00 332,198.00 .00 9,121.00 97.3 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 47,078.00 .00 42,370.20 4,707.80 .00 100.0 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 19,097.00 2,078.00 16,398.00 .00 2,699.00 85.9 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 902,373.00 4,099.16 176,750.54 29,023.36 696,599.10 22.8 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 328,380.00 .00 17,836.89 22,321.57 288,221.54 12.2 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 154,031.00 .00 140,987.90 13,043.10 .00 100.0 136 LOWER PIER ADMIN EXP FUND 2,631.00 492.02 2,009.78 .00 621.22 76.4 137 MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND 8,544.00 678.81 7,228.96 .00 1,315.04 84.6 138 LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND 9,188.00 792.92 7,809.77 .00 1,378.23 85.0 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 597,202.00 2,401.41 163,445.32 272,250.16 161,506.52 73.0 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 264,457.00 4,875.37 140,323.65 .00 124,133.35 53.1 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 772,760.00 4,417.11 375,030.09 118,604.36 279,125.55 63.9 150 GRANTS FUND 772,922.00 404.52 405,558.61 137,571.31 229,792.08 70.3 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 1,500.00 35.00 640.00 .00 860.00 42.7 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 174,343.00 3,668.60 62,033.49 23,409.95 88,899.56 49.0 154 CA LAW ENF EQUIP PROG (CLEEP) 142,618.00 30,400.00 42,001.00 62,033.38 38,583.62 72.9 160 SEWER FUND 1,097,661.00 48,759.59 455,784.06 86,061.43 555,815.51 49.4 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 576,859.00 27,144.63 130,079.10 3,194.67 443,585.23 23.1 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 2,061,793.00 6,095.95 309,304.82 718,408.25 1,034,079.93 49.8 302 ARTESIA BLVD RELINQUISHMENT 491,120.00 .00 12,180.00 .00 478,940.00 2.5 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND 4,995.00 .00 4,995.00 .00 .00 100.0 308 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND 73,185.00 6,664.00 50,483.50 22,701.00 .50 100.0 705 INSURANCE FUND 1,410,883.00 109,934.27 1,280,382.08 .00 130,500.92 90.8 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 2,086,949.00 164,473.25 996,109.45 216,548.16 874,291.39 58.1 GRAND TOTALS 35,838,339.00 2,062,529.60 22,580,667.75 2,504,284.47 10,753,386.78 70.0 - TREASURER'S REPORT - Apr -02 • FUND GENERAL 04/01/2002 04/30/2002 NUMBER ACCOUNT BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENT CHECKS ADJUSTMENT BALANCE 001 GENERAL 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 110 PARKING 115 STATE GAS TAX 117 AB939 119 COMP ABSENCES 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE 125 PARK REC FAC TAX 126 RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY 127 BUILDING IMPROVMENT FUND 136 LOWER PIER ADMIN EXP FUND 137 MYRTLE ADMIN EXP FUND 138 LOMA ADMIN EXP FUND 140 COMM DEVELOP. BLOCK GRANT 145 PROPOSITION A FUND 146 PROPOSITION C FUND 150 GRANT FUND 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DISTRICT 153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFOR SVC 154 CA LAW ENF EQUIP PROGRAM 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 170 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 199 CONTINGENCY FUND 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 302 ARTESIA BLVD. RELINQUISHMENT FUND 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDERGRND IMPR 308 LOMA UTIL UNDERGRND IMPROV 610 LOWER PIER DISTRICT REDEMP 617 MYRTLE REDEMPTION FUND 618 LOMA REDEMPTION FUND 705 INSURANCE FUND 715 EQUIP. REPLACEMENT FUND 900 INVESTMENT FUND TOTAL GENERAL ACCOUNT $2,964,014.74 $270,136.21 $605,994.95 $238,472.48 $60,388.47 $373,169.52 $391,109.61 $4,802.82 ($390,289.71) $692,788.57 $323,235.85 $15,775.58 $1,353.83 $7,346.28 $9,791.14 ($163,748.39) $199,300.56 . $592,070.92 ($339,542.27) $35,119.57 $135,430.40 $141,164.29 $3,569,355.34 $165,162.89 $472,583.21 $1,853,154.13 $2,538,081.64 $484,814.18 $65,749.82 $18,055.52 $121,361.74 $15,648.70 $46,247.64 $51,783.90 $3,268,865.45 $2,076,208.16 $0.00 $2,286,798.51 $105,658.10 $65,886.41 $219,552.88 $40,710.18 $5,329.09 $17,292.00 $242,380.43 $2,505.78 $10,873.79 $2,591.79 $27,098.80 $3,416.61 $44.06 $6,349.64 $2,958.50 $146.82 $72.48 $87.85 $13,094.50 $1,829.10 $5,415.00 $91,686.56 $323.54 $1,235.01 $1,280.73 $2,144.56 $91,504.76 $1,515.60 $11,669.00 $4,323.64 $16,913.85 $56,569.84 $4,444.21 $603.35 $162.24 $1,114.61 $7,038.31 $149.57 $26,093.46 $436.87 $37,548.48 $486.77 $97,378.00 $157.50 $83,443.00 $15,312.50 $132,109.55 ($954,661.95) ($34,969.38) ($40,178.01) ($103,063.20) ($1,431.93) ($4,099.16) ($411.02) ($442.81) ($523.92) ($1,396.80) ($4,459.36) ($3,712.67) ($382.97) ($41.36) ($3,668.60) ($30,400.00) ($36,772.75) ($19,121.63) ($5,883.84) ($6,664.00) ($108,381.48) ($158,828.73) ($412,252.77) $4,126,278.96 ($11,065.33) $332,265.38 ($1,532.97) $641,044.17 ($84,946.88) $272,607.07 ($31,433.94) $96,763.51 ($665.28) $379,818.01 ($4,562.00) $386,547.61 ($29.19) $4,817.69 ($2,078.00) ($392,367.71) ($502.63) $711,828.42 ($240.21) $325,954.14 ($12.10) $15,910.30 ($81.00) $861.81 ($241.56) $6,734.39 ($275.67) $9,079.40 ($92.30) ($165,237.49) ($616.75) $209,148.05 ($1,075.33) $592,697.92 ($8,982.28) ($257,220.96) ($26.61) $35,375.14 ($105.03) $132,891.78 ($112.32) $111,932.70 ($14,202.99) $3,612,028.92 ($121.44) $166,557.05 ($8,381.21) $461,073.01 ($1,261.11) $1,868,806.87 ($2,186.36) $2,586,581.28 ($330.00) $488,928.39 ($48.56) $66,304.61 ($13.35) $18,204.41 ($95.16) $115,717.19 (11.11) $22,825.47 ($31.11) $72,746.86 ($35.56) $89,783.59 ($1,552.78) $3,256,309.19 ($4,305.00) $1,996,674.93 ($147,422.05) $0.00 $20,914,957.74 $2,945,972.04 $799,765.79 ($1,519,495.57) TRUST BALANCE BALANCE ACCOUNTS 04/01/2002 DEPOSITS CHARGES 04/30/2002 PAYROLL CABLE TV DEPOSIT TOTAL TRUST ACCOUNTS TOTAL ALL ACCOUNTS $21,952,454.39 INVESTMENTS $564,040.02 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $3,000.00 $10,000.00 $13,000.00 $741,714.40 ($741,714.40) $741,714.40 ($741,714.40) JOH /"� . • - KMAN, CITY TREASURER $3,000.00 $10,000.00 $13,000.00 $22,413,272.06 ($740,927.94) $22,400,272.06 BANK BALANCES GENERAL $711,136.15 TRUST ACCTS $16,918.96 OUTSTANDING CHECKS $728,055.11 ($267,237.44) $460,817.67 INVESTMENTS $21,952,454.39 BALANCE $22,413,272.06 2 d(z) • • Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 21, 2002 City Council Meeting of May 28, 2002 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. Attached is a report of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of April 2002. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, Workman ity T easurer NOTED: Stephe rrell City Manager NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland Finance Director 2d(3) INSTITUTION LAIF 04/01/2002 • INVESTMENT REPORT Ape DATE OF DATE OF BOOK VALUE INVESTMENT MATURITY $17,993,459.00 $432,109.55 04/30/2002 $18,425,568.55 CORPORATE NOTES: Commercial Cr Group Inc Ford Motor Credit U.S. TREASURY BONDS/NOTES: United States Treasury Note $499,139.91 $504,471.10 U.S. GOVT AGENCY BONDS/NOTES Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp $508,930.44 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp $513,823.67 U.S. GOV'T AGCY -STATE TAX EXEMPT DISC Federal Home Loan Bank $500,000.00 Federal Home Loan Bank $499,807.26 Federal Home Loan Bank $500,713.46 INVESTMENT TOTAL $21,952,454.39 ORIGINAL COST MARKET * VALUE 08/25/2000 09/15/2002 $495,285.00 $507,880.00 05/25/2001 04/28/2003 $508,700.00 $510,325.00 03/27/2002 05/15/2004 $509,350.00 $514,845.00 04/25/2002 05/15/2004 $513,935.00 $514,845.00 05/18/2000 05/01/2002 07/25/2000 07/25/2002 07/20/2001 05/15/2003 $495,482.50 $498,345.00 $501,250.00 $3,522,347.50 $500,000.00 $505,470.00 $510,625.00 $3,563,990.00 FACE/PAR VALUE $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $3,500,000.00 In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months. Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, !WORKMAN EASURER Provided by Union'Bank of California RATE OF INTEREST 2.960% 6.375% 6.125% 5.000% 5.000% 6.750% 6.750% 4.500% 6.750% May 15, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members For the City Council Meeting of the City Council of May 28, 2002 ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council accept donations received by the City to be used as follows: Jean Lombardo Respectfully submitted: 400.00 To be used for promotional materials for the City of Hermosa Beach street safety program. Concur: Valerie Mohler Viki Copeland Accounting Supervisor c: \donation 2000.doc Finance Director Ste • hen Burrell City Manager 1?;c/.1 • ,5/47/-0 PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE MAY 7, 2002 MEETING Roll Call: Present: Chairperson Francis, and Commissioners Bell, Fishman, Hollander, and Sigler Staff: Rooney Approval of April 2, 2002 Minutes Motion: "To approve as submitted." Hollander/Fishman All Ayes Correspondence N/A Public Comment N/A Matters for Commission Consideration Hermosa Beach Historical Society Museum Expansion This item was removed from the agenda by staff to allow time for the Historical Society and staff to refine the plan. So. Cal. Foundation for Children Charity Beach Volleyball Tournament Commissioner Sigler abstained from the vote since he is one of the event organizers. Commissioner Sigler spoke on behalf of the charity event. Ms. Wong, a representative from the Southern California Foundation for Children, also addressed the Commission in support of the event. Motion: "To approve the Charity Beach Volleyball Tournament and forward the contract to City Council for final review and approval." Fishman/Hollander — Ayes: Fishman, Hollander, Francis, Bell Abstain — Sigler 2f • • Donation from Mervyn's Motion: "To accept $40,000 donation from Mervyn's to the City to fund the following programs: 1. Skate Track Staffing 2. Education Foundation 3. Teen Center (climbing wall) 4. Community Picnic BelUSigler — All Ayes $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000" Commissioners Items • Commissioner Fishman requested that staff look into the issue of foliage planted on park fences with regards to safety and visibility. • Commissioner Bell suggested that staff consider adding padding to the basketball court standards at Clark. • Chairperson Francis requested that the Commission study: (a) the possibility of adding parking adjacent to the Greenbelt near South Park and (b) amending the City ordinance related to the Municipal Pier in order to consider whether or not to allow dogs, bikes, etc. on the Pier. Staff Notes 1. Add South Park parking and Pier ordinance to next agenda. 2. Election of Officers to be added to next agenda. Motion: "To Adjourn" Hollander/Fishman — All Ayes Adjournment: 8:10 PM May 13, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 28, 2002 SO. CAL. FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN CHARITY BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT i Recommendation The Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Commission and staff recommend that Council: 1. Approve the request from the Dig for Kids Foundation and So. Cal. Foundation for Children, both Hermosa Beach based non-profit organizations, to conduct a Beach Volleyball Tournament on the North side of the Pier, Saturday, July 27th, 2002 from 9 AM to 5 PM. 2. Waive the participant/spectator fees. 3. Approve the event contract (Attachment). Background Staff has received an application from the Dig for Kids Foundation and So. Cal. Foundation for Children requesting to hold an adult Beach Volleyball Tournament in Hermosa Beach on the North side of the Pier on Saturday, July 27th, 2002. Founded and operated by local Professional Beach Volleyball Players, Eric Fonoimoana and Albert Hannemann, Dig for Kids (DFK) is an organization that combines after- school volleyball lessons with academic tutoring and mentoring. The So. Cal. Foundation for Children (SCFC) raises funds for scholarships and the purchase of gifts for children that would otherwise go without during the holiday season. Both organizations provide educational guidance and athletic opportunity to underprivileged youth in the South Bay and Los Angeles areas. Analysis This event meets the required criteria to be classified as a non-profit event as stipulated by the City of Hermosa Beach Community Resources Department, Special Event Permit Rules and Regulations. The Dig for Kids Foundation is a registered non-profit organization, while the So. Cal. Foundation for Children is recognized by the City of Hermosa Beach as a local service organization. In accordance with policy, 100% of all event proceeds will be donated to the aforementioned non-profit groups. g • • Local residents will be provided with an opportunity to enjoy Beach Volleyball at an advanced level of play, as either a participant or a spectator. The one -day Tournament will facilitate a Professional Division, 2 -person elimination format, and a Recreational Division, 4 -person co-ed teams. An estimated 200 local players are expected to draw a crowd of 200 spectators. Tournament Directors, Albert Hannemann and Bill Sigler, have proven to be successful in the operation of other local charity events and volleyball tournaments. The proceeds from the Tournament will be donated to charities benefiting youth from the South Bay and surrounding areas. Fiscal Impact: Estimated Fees $850 Attachment : Event Contract Respectfully submitted, Lisa Lynn Recreation Supervisor Concur: Mary ''money Dire or of Community Resources Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance HERMOSA BEACH CHARITY BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT SPECIAL EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on May 14,th, 2002, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between DIG FOR KIDS FOUNDATION & SO. CAL. FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN both non- profit organizations and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY) with regards to a BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT on SATURDAY, JULY 27TH 2002. FEES Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children shall pay for any direct City staff costs associated with monitoring the event. All predetermined fees shall be paid two weeks prior to event. All unanticipated costs incurred by CITY on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from CITY. Per participant/spectator fees are waived. LOCATION Competition on Beach, North of the Pier. POLICE/FIRE/SECURITY CITY shall provide Officers for the event if the Chief of Police determines that Officers are necessary to ensure event safety. CITY shall provide Fire/Paramedic personnel for the event if the Fire Chief determines that it is necessary to ensure event safety. All costs of the Officers and Fire/Paramedic personnel shall be assumed by Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children. CLEAN-UP Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children shall be responsible to clean all areas occupied or affected by the event. Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside CITY at end of event. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children desires any County services, they must process their request through CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children . INSURANCE At least ten (10) days prior to the event, Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children shall provide CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing personal injury and property damage liability insurance naming CITY, and County of Los Angeles, their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of 1 million combined single limit coverage for both dates. Said insurance shall not be canceled or altered without 30 days notice in writing to CITY and County. Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. For insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to include any and all areas occupied or affected by the event. Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children, its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. ADVERTISING CITY shall permit street banners to be posted for the event. Cost of installation shall be borne by Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children. SPECIAL EVENTS CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of said event. CITY shall have the right to deny any and all requests. Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children shall abide by all CITY rules and regulations for special events. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES OF USSF Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children shall provide CITY with copies of signed waiver forms from all event participants. Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children will be required to obtain an amplification permit. Event shall be conducted in compliance with CITY Noise Ordinances. Ordinances are on file at the Department of Community Resources. Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children will be solely responsible for event management. • • Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children will notify all affected residents/merchants about the competition and festival. Dig for Kids Foundation and the So. Cal. Foundation for Children will abide by any additional policies or appropriate fees as established by CITY. CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND AND/OR TERMINATE THIS CONTRACT AT ANY TIME. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor Date APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Date DIG FOR KIDS FOUNDATION So. Cal. Foundation for Children Director of Operations Date SO. CAL. FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN Date ATTEST City Clerk Date • May 13, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council 5/AA Regular Meeting of May 28, 2002 MERVYN'S BEACH BASH COMMUNITY GRANTS I Recommendation The Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Commission and staff recommend that Council accept the $40,000 donation from the Mervyn's Beach Bash event to fund the following programs: 1. Skate Park staffing $10,000 2. Hermosa Beach Education Foundation $10,000 3. Teen Center (climbing wall) $10,000 4. Hermosa Beach Community Picnic $10,000 Background City Council approved the Beach Bash event for June 7-9, 2002. In addition to the required City fees (estimated at $46,000), IMG, Mervyn's and co-sponsors have agreed to donate $40,000 for specific Hermosa Beach programs. Analysis In addition to being important programs to Hermosa Beach, it is crucial that the programs supported by Mervyn's and co-sponsors are relevant both to their grant program objectives (primarily youth related) and to the event itself (e.g., skate park; teen center, special event for Hermosa residents). The above submissions have been approved by IMG and Mervyn's for grant submittal and (since the allocations are similar to last year's) should be met with their approval. In addition, they each address issues of: (a) providing a direct local benefit as an answer to local impacts of the event, and (b) supporting programs that align strongly with Mervyn's corporate objectives. On the parks tour, the Commission noted that South Park lacked play equipment for older children. With the opening of the Teen Center and the residence of School District after school care, the Commissioners thought that a climbing wall may be a favorable addition to the park. The $10,000 grant would pay for the majority of the cost of this equipment. If the City decided not to buy a climbing wall, the funds would be used for an alternate item at South Park. 2h FISCAL IMPACT: $30,000 donation to the General Fund. $10,000 to the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation. 'r • • Respectfully Submitted, Mary ' •4'"-y Com nity Resources Director Concur: 4 Step . urrell City Manager i Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance • May 9, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 28, 2002 Subject: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 2003-2005 COOPERATION AGREEMENT Purpose: RENEW COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION TO CONTINUE FUNDING THE PROJECTS TO REMOVE ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS TO THE DISABLED AT PUBLIC FACILITIES. Recommendation • Approve by minute order the Cooperation Agreement with the Los Angeles County Community Development Commission (CDC). • Authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperation Agreement. Background On June 28, 1999 the City Council approved renewing the Cooperation Agreement with the Community Development Commission for funding proposed City projects under the Community Development Block Grant Program. Since 1999 the CDBG Program has been used to fund the City's compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act and for the utility undergrounding projects. In April 2002, the City Council executed a Reimbursable Contract with the CDC that will allow for the expenditure of allocated funds through June, 2003. Analysis The attached Cooperation Agreement is a renewal of the original three-year agreement to continue participation in the CDBG program. Concur: Sol Blumen Community 'rector evelopment Director Manager Michael S ubach, City Planner Cdcoop02 • • COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM, HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAMS AND ASSISTED HOUSING PROGRAMS PARTICIPATING CITY 2003-2005 COOPERATION AGREEMENT THIS Agreement is made and entered into this 1st day of July, 2003, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, hereinafter referred to as "City," and the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter referred to as "County." WITNES SETH THAT: WHEREAS, County and City desire to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking, community development, community renewal of lower income housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing, including, but not limited to, the improvement or development of housing for persons of low- to moderate -income, and other community or urban renewal activities authorized by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, the Cranston -Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (NAHA) and the U.S. Housing Act of 1937, as amended, hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Act"; and WHEREAS, the terms and provisions of this Agreement are fully authorized under State and local law, and this Agreement provides full legal authority for the County and its agents, including the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles and the Community Development Commission of the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter collectively referred to as the "County," to undertake, or assist in undertaking, essential community development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. The City and the County agree to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking, community development, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing, including, but not limited to, the improvement or development of housing for persons of low- to moderate -income, and other community or urban renewal activities authorized by the Act. 2. The City hereby authorizes the County to perform, or cause to be performed, those acts necessary or appropriate to implement the community development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing, including but not limited to improvement or development of housing for persons of low- tp moderate -income, and other community or urban renewal activities authorized under the Act specified for the City in the County's annual Housing and Community Development Plan which will be funded from annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and applicable HOME Investment Partnerships Programs ("HOME") funds from Federal Fiscal Years 2003-2005 appropriations and from any program income generated from the expenditure of such funds. County shall have final responsibility for selecting projects and annually filing its Final Housing and Community Development Plan. 3. The City and the County in the performance of this Agreement shall take all actions necessary or appropriate to assure compliance with the County's certification required by Section 104 (b) of Title I of the Act, the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Section 109 of Title I of the Act, Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, the Fair Housing Act, the Act and all other applicable laws and regulations. 1 • • 4. The City may not apply for grants from appropriations under the Small Cities or State CDBG Programs for fiscal years during the period in which it participates in the Los Angeles Urban County Program. 5. The City may participate in a HOME Program only through the Los Angeles Urban County. Thus, even if the Los Angeles Urban County does not receive a HOME formula allocation, the City cannot form a HOME consortium with other local governments. 6. The City and County agree that CDBG and HOME funding is prohibited for any activities in or in support of any cooperating City that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes the County's action to comply with its fair housing certification. 7. Pursuant to 24 CFR 570.501 (b), the City is subject to all requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement of a written Agreement set forth in 24 CFR 570.503. 8. The City shall inform the County of any income generated by the expenditure of CDBG funds received by the City. Any such program income maybe retained by the City subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Such program income may only be used for eligible activities in accordance with all CDBG requirements as may then apply. 9. 'The County shall be responsible for monitoring and reporting to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on the use of any program income; therefore, the City shall be required to maintain appropriate recordkeeping and reporting for this purpose. 10. In the event of close-out or changes in status of the City, any program income that is on hand or received subsequent to the close-out or change in status shall be reimbursed to the County. 11. All program income generated from the disposition or transfer of real property acquired or improved by the City, using CDBG and/or HOME funds or program income, during the term of this Agreement, shall be treated as described in Sections 6 through 10 of this Agreement. 12. Any real property which is acquired or improved by the City during the term of this Agreement, in whole or in part, using CDBG and/or HOME funds or program income, shall be subject to the following standards: (i) Thq County shall be notified by the City in writing of any modification or change in the use or disposition of such real property from that planned at the time of acquisition or improvement. Such notification shall be made prior to the modification or change in use or disposition. (ii) If such real property is ever sold or transferred for a use which does not qualify as an eligible use under CDBG and/or HOME regulations, the City shall reimburse to the County an amount equal to the current fair market value of the property less any portion thereof attributable to expenditures of non-CDBG and/or HOME funds. 13. The City shall make available for inspection and audit to County's representatives, upon request, at any time during the duration of this Agreement and during a period of three (3) years, thereafter, all of its books and records relating to CDBG and HOME program incomes. 2 • • 14. This Agreement shall be effective for the period of time required for the expenditure of all applicable CDBG and/or HOME funds allocated to the City from federal Fiscal Years 2003-2005 appropriations and from any program income therefrom and for the completion of the funded activities. In no event shall this Agreement be terminated before June 30, 2006 except as a result of action by HUD. The City or the County may not terminate or withdraw from this Agreement while it remains in effect. 15. The City has adopted and is enforcing: (i) A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and (ii) A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non- violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction. 16. The City shall or shall continue to provide a drug-free workplace by: (i) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the City's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; (ii) Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about: (a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (b) The City's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and (d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace. (iii) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by subparagraph (i) of this Section 16. (iv) Notifying the employee in the statement required by subparagraph (i) of this Section 16 that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will (a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (b) Notify the City in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; (v) Notifying the County in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving noticeunder subparagraph (iv)(b) of this Section 16 from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction; and the City must provide written notice, including position or title, of any City employees convicted of any criminal drug statute to every County grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a identification number(s) of each affected grant. 3 • • (vi) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (iv)(b) of this Section 16, with respect to any employee who is so convicted; (i) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (ii) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purpose by a federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency. (vii) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of subparagraphs (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), and (vi) of this Section 16. 4 • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles has caused this Contract to be subscribed by the Executive Director of the Community Development Commission, and the Operating Agency has subscribed the same through its duly authorized officers, the day, month and year first above written CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES By By MAYOR or DESIGNEE CARLOS JACKSON, Executive Director Community Development Commission of the County of Los Angeles ATTEST: By City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: LLOYD W. PELLMAN County Counsel By By City Attorney Deputy LW/COOP-2003-05 5 • ION .............. AGENDA • Q—c—/Ac2- PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER, ROOM 4 710 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 May 21, 2002 7:00 P.M. Sam Perrotti Chairman Ron Pizer Vice Chair Peter Hoffman Peter Tucker Langley Kersenboom 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call COMM.HOFFMAN ARRIVED LATE. Section I Consent Calendar Any Planning Commissioner or public wishing to pull an item from below may request to do so at this time. 3. Approval of April 16, 2002 minutes ACTION: APPROVED (4-0). 4. Resolution(s) for adoption a. Resolution P.C. 02-17 to deny a Conditional Use Permit for an existing small beer manufacturer with on -sale beer and wine to extend hours to 1:30 a.m. and to increase bar seating area; and to deny a Parking Plan amendment to use off-site parking to meet parking requirements for 58 11th Street. b. Resolution P.C. 02-18 denying a Conditional Use Permit amendment for on -sale general alcohol; live entertainment and alterations to an existing restaurant to include a dance floor for 1100 The Strand. c. Resolution P.C. 02-19 approving a Conditional Use Permit minor amendment to change hours of operation of an existing market with off -sale beer and wine from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. to 8:00 A.M. to 12 midnight Sunday through Thursday, and 2:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday for 205 Pier Avenue. d. Resolution P.C. 02-20 approving an amended Conditional Use Permit to allow t 2j general alcohol in conjunction with live entertainment at 142 Pacific Coast Highway, The Pitcher House. e. Resolution P.C. 02-21 approving a two hundred fifty square foot expansion and remodel to an existing four-plex and conversion to a duplex while maintaining nonconforming parking, lot coverage, front setback, open space, height, and land use at 802 The Strand. ACTION: APPROVED (4-0). 5. Item(s) for consideration Section II Oral / Written Communications 6. Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. NONE Section III Public Hearing(s) 7. Development Plan (PDP) No. 01-10 and an Addendum to the Certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR), to allow Tyco Telecommunications to utilize a Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) method of installation for the segment of the submarine fiber optic cable project located between Hermosa Avenue and the Strand, along Second Street, then under the beach and out to approximately 3000 feet beyond the shoreline, in lieu of the Direct Burial method approved by the City Council in December of 2001, to install the two fiber optic cables along this same alignment. An Addendum to the certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to assess any potential environmental impacts and incorporate or revise applicable mitigation measures associated with the Horizontal Directional Drilling option. All other aspects of the project are unchanged and are in accordance with the previously approved PDP and EIR. Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval to the City Council and approve the said request. ACTION: APPROVED (4-0). 8. CUP 02-5 -- Conditional Use Permit amendment to locate wireless communication antennae on an existing office building at 200 Pier Avenue, Nextel. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. ACTION: APPROVED (3-1,COMM.TUCKER NO). 9. CUP 02-6 -- Conditional Use Permit to allow additionl rooftop telecommunication equipment to an existing building nonconforming to height requirements at 2601 Pacific Coast Highway, Cingular Wireless. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. ACTION: APPROVED (4-0). 2 Section IV Hearing(s) 10. NR 02-5 -- Addition and remodel of an existing nonconforming single family residence resulting in a greater than 50% increase in valuation at 2716 Hermosa Avenue. Staff Recommended Action: To continue to June 18, 2002 meeting. ACTION: CONTINUED TO JUNE 18, 2002 MEETING. 11. NR 02-6 -- Addition and remodel to an existing nonconforming single-family dwelling resulting in a greater than 50% increase in valuation at 1557 Golden Avenue. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. ACTION: APPROVED (2-1,CHMN.PERROTTI ABSTAINED AND COMM.PIZER NO). Section V 12. Staff Items a. Memorandum regarding mezzanine addition / change of use within manufacturing building at 717 Valley Drive. ACTION: PARKING PLAN REQUIRED FOR SUBJECT CHANGE (5-0). b. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. c. Community Development Department Activity Report of March, 2002. d. City Council minutes of March 4, 12, 26, April 9 and 23, 2002. ACTION: RECEIVED AND FILED THE ABOVE 12B -D. 13. Commissioner Items 14. Adjournment 3 • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council • May 16, 2002 Regular Meeting of April 23, 2002 PROJECT STATUS REPORT Recommendation: It is recommended that Council receive and file this report. As of April 30, 2002 Summary: This report gives the status of capital improvement projects that are either under design or construction. Capital improvement projects not indicated in this report can be found in the department's Monthly Activity Report. Project Status: PROJECT NO. CIP 01-159 HILLCREST AND RHODES. 18TH ST. TO 21'T STREET DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 08-09-01 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 05-02 09-30-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW COMPLETED 01-16-02; 3-20-02 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 06-02 7-24-01 BID OPENING 07-02 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 08-02 9-11-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 09-02 COMPLETED END CONSTRUCTION 01-03 2-28-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 01-166 SLURRY AND CRACK SEALING EAST OF PCH DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING• DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 09-30-01 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) NIA COMPLETED 10-30-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 7-24-01 N/A COMPLETED TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD N/A 9-11-01 BID OPENING COMPLETED COMPLETED 11-15-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 2-28-02 COMPLETED 11-27-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 03-18-02 END CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 04-17-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 01-168 MANHATTAN AVENUE. 27TH ST. TO BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 3-20-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 7-12-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW NIA 03-14-01 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 7-24-01 BID OPENING COMPLETED 8-30-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 9-11-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 11-5-01 END CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 2-28-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 00-171 ARDMORE STREET IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 12-21-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 02-15-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW COMPLETED 03-14-01 BID OPENING COMPLETED 03-19-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 03-27-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 07-09-01 END CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 12-24-01 21 PROJECT NO. CIP 00-172 21"T STREET - VY TO POWER STREET IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS 1111111, STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03-08-00 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 12-21-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 06-25-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 05-02-01, 7-11-01, 9-12-01 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 01-08-02 BID OPENING COMPLETED 02-14-02 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 03-12-02 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 05-02 04-02 END CONSTRUCTION 07-02 06-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 00-191 14T" STREET LANDSCAPED PLANTERS DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03-08-00 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 02-15-01 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 12-06-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW COMPLETED 08-08-01 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 01-22-02 BID OPENING COMPLETED 03-07-02 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 03-26-02 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 04-02 END CONSTRUCTION 06-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 00-192 LOMA AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03-08-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 9-02 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD BID OPENING • TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 00410 LOMA AREA SEWER IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03-08-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 8-02 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 00-411 SEWER REHABILITATION. AREA 1 DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 3-27-02 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 8-02 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 00-412 SEWER REHABTION. AREA 2 DESCRIPTION STATUS Now STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 06-24-99 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 3-27-02 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TBD 03-27-01 BACK TO STAFF ; COMPLETED 2-25-02 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD 07-02 BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 00-413 SEWER REHABILITATION, AREA 3 DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 06-24-99 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 3-27-02 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TBD 03-27-01 BACK TO STAFF ; COMPLETED 2-25-02 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD 07-02 BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 00-414 SEWER REHABILITATION. AREA 4 DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 06-24-99 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 3-27-02 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TBD 03-27-01 BACK TO STAFF ; COMPLETED 2-25-02 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD 07-02 BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 95-507 VALLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 06-24-99 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 03-05-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 03-27-01 BACK TO STAFF ; COMPLETED 2-25-02 BID OPENING 04-18-02 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 06-02 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 07-02 END CONSTRUCTION 03-03 PROJECT NO. CIP 99-529 CLARK FIELD IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 02-28-02 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 10-02 TO PARKS A RECREATION COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 09-02 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 12-02 BID OPENING 01-03 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 02-03 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 03-03 END CONSTRUCTION 06-03 PROJECT NO. CIP 01-531 3RD STREET PAR DESCRIPTION STATUS _STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 04-05-01 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 05-01-01 TO PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FOR REVIEW COMPLETED 06-01-01 TO PUBLIC WORKS COMPASSION FOR REVIEW NIA 11-28-00 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 11-13-01 BID OPENING COMPLETED 12-13-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 02-12-02 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 04-08-02 11-19-01 END CONSTRUCTION 06-02 02-28-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 01-532 SOUTH PARK HOCKEY RINK IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 05-08-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 10-23-00 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW NIA CM AGREEMENT TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 11-28-00 BID OPENING COMPLETED 12-07-00 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO RE -BID COMPLETED 02-27-01 TO COUNCIL FOR SOLE SOURCE AWARD COMPLETED 07-24-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 11-19-01 END CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 02-28-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 95-622 CITY HALL REMODEL - ADA UPGRADES DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED COMPLETED DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED COMPLETED TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A N/A CM AGREEMENT TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL COMPLETED 11-28-00 COMPLETED CONSTRUCTIBILITY REVIEW COMPLETED COMPLETED RELOCATION PROGRAMMING COMPLETED COMPLETED TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS & SPECS, ADVERTISE COMPLETED . 05-22-01 11-19-01 BID OPENING COMPLETED 07-12-01 03-02 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD; ALTERNATE AWARD COMPLETED 08-28-01; 09-25-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 10-29-01 END CONSTRUCTION 06-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 01-628 COMMUNITY CENTER - COURTYARD DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 04-09-01 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 06-14-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 07-24-01 BID OPENING COMPLETED 09-17-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 10-09-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 11-19-01 END CONSTRUCTION 03-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 01-628 COMMUNITY CENTER - PAINTING DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 04-09-01 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 06-14-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 07-24-01 BID OPENING COMPLETED 10-15-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 01-08-02 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 05-02 END CONSTRUCTION 08-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 00-630 PIER RENOVATION, PHASE III DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03-08-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 12-02 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 01-03 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 01-03 BID OPENING 01-03 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 02-03 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 04-03 END CONSTRUCTION 04-04 • Indicates Construction Completed *TBD— TO BE DETERMINED Respectfully submitted, /Harold C. VViliiams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Stephe City Manager .ri \\HERMOSA\VOL1\B95\PWFILES\CCfrEMS\progress reports 1-11-02.doc • May 22, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council 57:* Regular Meeting of May 28, 2002 Approval of Recommendation for Third Party Administration of General Liability Claims Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve a proposal for third party administration of the City's general liability claims submitted by the firm of Colen & Lee and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract for a three year term commencing July 1, 2002 with an option to negotiate a two year extension based on performance. Background: The contract with the existing third party administrator, Fleming & Associates, will expire June 30, 2002. Fleming & Associates has been providing third party administration of the City's general liability claims since July 1, 1997. At that time the City entered into a three year service agreement that contained a two year extension provision. At the completion of the three year term, the extension was executed as the services performed were acceptable and Fleming & Associates agreed to continue providing the service without an increase in fees. The service fees have remained unchanged since July 1, 1997. In anticipation of the expiration of the agreement, staff prepared and advertised a request for proposals. The Notice Inviting Proposals was published on April 4 and April 11, 2002 in the Daily Breeze. The Request For Proposals was also mailed directly to thirteen companies who had either requested to be placed on a bid list or are known to provide the services desired. The City received six responses to the request. Based on an initial review of the proposals submitted, four of these companies were invited to an interview with the Personnel & Risk Management Director and the Finance Director. Analysis: The lowest bid from the proposals submitted was provided by Colen & Lee at a maximum fee of $12,000 per year for the three year term. Below is a table showing the total three year cost of the four companies interviewed. As shown, Colen & Lee's proposed fee is approximately 21% less than the fee proposed by Fleming & Associates. It should be noted that Fleming & Associates has proposed a 43% increase in fees. The City has experience in service provided by Colen & Lee, as this was the company providing liability claims administration services through June 30, 1997. Colen & Lee currently provides liability claims administration services for twelve other cities and several special districts. The company's focus is in providing service to local governments. References were also contacted with very favorable recommendations. In addition, Colen & Lee is on the list of approved claims administration service providers maintained by the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority. It is anticipated that a contract can be negotiated with Colen & Lee which will include provisions for termination should the services provided not be acceptable. A three year contract is proposed with an option for a two year renewal based on performance as recommended by the City Manager and Personnel Director. Attached is a copy of the proposal from Colen & Lee for your review and information. Copies of each of the proposals submitted are available for review in the Personnel Office. Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of approving the proposal with Colen & Lee will result in an expenditure not to exceed $13,875 in the 2002/2003 fiscal year. Over the three year proposed term, a twenty-one percent .(21%) savings will be realized over the fees proposed by the current service provider. Respectfully submitted, . _ Concur, hael A. Earl, Direct ersonnel & Risk Management /1/til Stephen Burrell City Manager Total 3 Year Cost Colen & Lee $36,019 Fleming & Associates $43,500 Advanced Risk Technologies $55,600 Ward North America $61,500 The City has experience in service provided by Colen & Lee, as this was the company providing liability claims administration services through June 30, 1997. Colen & Lee currently provides liability claims administration services for twelve other cities and several special districts. The company's focus is in providing service to local governments. References were also contacted with very favorable recommendations. In addition, Colen & Lee is on the list of approved claims administration service providers maintained by the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority. It is anticipated that a contract can be negotiated with Colen & Lee which will include provisions for termination should the services provided not be acceptable. A three year contract is proposed with an option for a two year renewal based on performance as recommended by the City Manager and Personnel Director. Attached is a copy of the proposal from Colen & Lee for your review and information. Copies of each of the proposals submitted are available for review in the Personnel Office. Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of approving the proposal with Colen & Lee will result in an expenditure not to exceed $13,875 in the 2002/2003 fiscal year. Over the three year proposed term, a twenty-one percent .(21%) savings will be realized over the fees proposed by the current service provider. Respectfully submitted, . _ Concur, hael A. Earl, Direct ersonnel & Risk Management /1/til Stephen Burrell City Manager lr • PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 2002 ROOM 4, COMMUNITY CENTER 710 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 7:00 P.M. MINUTES The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. 1. Roll Call Present: Commissioners Cheatham, Howell, Koch, Winnek Also Present: Michael Flaherty, Public Works Superintendent Rhea Punneo, Administrative Assistant, Public Works Department Not Present: Commissioner Lombardo Harold Williams, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer, 2. Flaq Salute Chairman Winnek led the flag salute. 3. Approval of Minutes - The minutes of the April 17, 2002 meeting were approved as written. 4. Public Comments None. 5. Correspondence None. 6. Items for Commission Consideration a. Request to Remove Red Zone at 1107 Loma Drive Mr. Flaherty presented the item. He had taken pictures of the red zone area in question earlier that day, showing various angles revealing a 15 -foot vehicle's bumpers exceeding both ends of the allotted space, designated by the painted T and L markings. 2n • The slopes and faces of the driveways meet all Public The requirements and standards. Public Works crews put in all the other public parking spaces citywide. Discussion of the item highlighted the following: — There are no parking spaces in the City as small as this space — Many red zones throughout the City are similar to this one. — Mr. Flaherty noted the following: 1. If the red zone is removed, the space would be left for whatever size vehicle fits safely 2. Space will not have T and L markings 3. Curb should be sandblasted so that color is clear, not painted over. — The only designated compact car spaces in the City are determined by width, not length — Staff has discussed the situation with the property owner to the north of the space who is willing to allow the red curb to be removed; the owner to the south wants it kept red — There are no ordinances at this time regarding motorcycling, only about one vehicle per metered parking space Public comments included the following: Richard Applebaum, 1106 Loma Drive Mr. Applebaum stated he has spoken to many neighbors and feels he represents them. He explained that due to the number of restaurants, businesses, and even a ball park located in the vicinity of 1107 Loma Drive, parking space is at a premium and people over time have never failed to squeeze their cars into the tightest of spaces, spaces not designated for parking, and even spaces smaller than the one in question, without ever being ticketed. So the logic goes that if these areas are safe and acceptable by parking enforcement standards for parking, the one in question ought to be as well. Mr. Applebaum claims the photos exhibited do not objectively show the true size of the curbside area, and that a compact car could easily fit. He insists that curbs are not standardized anywhere, particularly in this part of the neighborhood, and in his fifteen years there, cars have parked there without a problem. The people who purchased and built this corner unit had already taken three parking spots away. So if this spot were painted red, it would become the fourth potential parking spot taken away. As far as safety goes, the people who live there will have to back out, turn around, and be aware of cars coming down, just like every other resident on the,street. Additional Commission discussion brought out the following information and/or comments: PWC Minutes 2 5/15/02 •i significance to the T and L markings that a car that exceeds the - There is no legal s g 9 markings is not necessarily in violation of parking laws. It's a judgement call and also depends on whether complaints are made. — The 18 -foot parking length standard was issued standard based on measurements taken in Redondo and Manhattan Beach, though other lengths exist, as it is possible to deviate from the standard. — The owner of the property next to the red zone, who opposes allowing parking, had a mostly positive history with the space but ultimately ended up having to tow cars that presented a problem to the driveway. — In the future, more thought and planning should be put into the early stages of development of new spaces regarding making the most of available parking space instead of letting it go to waste, and realizing this after the fact. MOTION by Vice Chairman Cheatham that they allow a sub -compact space at this location, 13 feet long, stamped with "sub -compact only" markings. No second, motion died. MOTION by Commissioner Koch to remove red zone with the understanding that motorcycles can park there. Removal would include sandblasting the paint and removing the Ts and Ls. Seconded by Vice Chairman Cheatham. Aye: Cheatham, Koch Nay: Howell Abstain: Winnek Absent: Lombardo Motion passed. 7. Commissioners' Reports Safety Sub -Committee Commissioner Howell reported that "Be Street Smart Hermosa" campaign pole banners were approved, will be going up around town. 8. Council Agendas - April a. Monthly Activity Report - March b. Project Status Reports - March ' 4 Above items are presented for information purposes'only. 9. Items Requested by Commissioners Vice Chairman Cheatham updated the statuses of three action items: the construction standards review action item is being handled by the infrastructure guideline PWC Minutes 3 5/15/02 subcommittee; theem for developing fair and equitable and consistent development standards is also being handled by the infrastructure guideline subcommittee; and there was a Council request that the Public Works Commission submit recommendations addressing concerns on curbs and gutters, also being handled by the infrastructure guideline subcommittee; these three action items can be combined and grouped as one. 10. Other Matters Vice Chairman Cheatham noted that National Public Works Week is coming up, and that there will be a barbecue at the City Yard for City employees. Vice Chairman Cheatham brought up as a potential agenda making the long red curb painted just outside the Coffee Bean on Hermosa Avenue a green zone, with two spaces to make it easier for customers to stop by for a quick coffee pickup, instead of being ticketed for risking a few minutes of parking. The following items were noted on this matter: — The curb was specifically painted red to facilitate the making of legally designated U-turns at the intersection where this red zone is located. Cars parking there would block the space needed to complete the U-turns safely. — The curb was painted red prior to the Coffee Bean being built. — Any changes would require Council approval, which would require an agenda item going to Council from the Commission recommending the change. Commissioner Koch requested an agenda item clarifying Council's speed hump policy explaining to the Committee what exactly is the current policy. Commissioner Howell suggested having as a future agenda item doing a study to see what the minimum possible size is for a safe parking spot, specifically inquiring about spaces for sub -compact cars and motorcycles. Commissioner Howell also suggested as a future agenda item for a subcommittee the issue of planting trees near public infrastructure. He's noticed many trees growing to the point where the roots are damaging nearby structures. He would like to make sure people plant appropriate trees near their buildings. The issue would be deferred to a street tree subcommittee. 11. Public Comments None. 12. Adjournment At 8:06 p.m. Chairman Winnek adjourned to the meeting of June 19, 2002. PWC Minutes 4 5/15/02 • S CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Public Works Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of May 15, 2002. Victor Winnek, Chairman Harold C. Williams, P.E., Secretary Date PWC Minutes 5 5/15/02 • • ,5710 May 21, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 28, 2002 PROJECT NO. CIP 01-531.3RD STREET PARK — NEW CONSTRUCTION APPROVE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR ADDITIONAL WORK Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve attached Supplemental Agreement No. 1 between the City and the contractor, Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, for $3,850.00; 2. Authorize the City Manager and the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to execute Supplemental Agreement No. 1; and 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within a contingency of $500.00. Summary: Staff requests that City Council approve Supplemental Agreement No. 1 (Please see Attachment 1) between the City and Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises in the amount of $3,850 plus a contingency of $500 for Project No. CIP 01-531, construction of a permanent street barricade on 3rd Street, 100 feet east of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH). At this time, there is an existing temporary barricade at this location. The residents have requested that the temporary barricade be replaced with a permanent slump stone barricade similar to the one located on 2nd Street, 140 feet east of PCH. In February 2002, City Council approved the construction contract between the City and Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises for this project. To date, they have performed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The scope of work consists of removal of an existing temporary barricade and construction of a freestanding slump stone wall per APWA Standards, Drawing No. 601-1, Type -2 (Refer to Attachment 2). The wall will be 4 feet high by 15 feet long with 2'-10" by 12" footing. A curb will be installed at the base of the wall for drainage. The construction cost proposal from Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises in the amount of $3,850 is reasonable and fair when compared with the California Conservation Corps' (CCC) quote received in June 2001. The CCC proposal totaled $3,414.10 and does not include installation of curbs for drainage. 2o • • Per the City Municipal Code, purchases of services and supplies less than $5,000 but more than $1,000, price quotes from at least three vendors are required. In order to expedite construction, Staff recommends that the City forego this process and allow Mariposa to do the work. Fiscal Impact: Sufficient funds are available in the project budget; therefore, no additional appropriation is necessary. Attachment 1: Supplemental Agreement No. 1 2: APWA Standards, Drawing No. 601-1 Respectfully submitted, Assistant Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: Oki Copeland, , Finance Director Concur: /Harold Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Step City Manager F:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\01-531 supplemental agreement 5-28-01.doc 2 • • SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 City of Hermosa Beach Department of Public Works Date: 5-21-02 Project Title: 3rd Street Park — New Construction Project No.: CIP NO. 01-531 The changes or interpretations described and noted herein are hereby authorized. The signed original of this order is on file at the office of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. You are hereby directed to make the herein -described changes to the plans and specifications. Note: This supplemental agreement is not effective until approved by Owner, or until an authorized Field Order is executed. Show as separate numbered paragraphs: (1) Reason for change; (2) Description of change; (3) Change in contract cost; (4) Extension of contract, if warranted; (1) Reason for change: To expedite construction, the City has requested that the contractor working on 3rd Street Park install a permanent slump stone barricade on 3rd Street 100 feet east of Pacific Coast Highway. (2) Description of change: Remove an existing temporary barricade and construct a free standing slump stone wall per APWA Standards, Drawing No. 601-1, Type -2 (See attached). The wall will be 4 feet high by 15 feet long with 2'-10" by 12" footing. The curb will be installed for drainage at the base of the wall. (3) Change in contract cost: ADD: $3,850.00 (4) Extension of Contract, if warranted: 20 Working Days The contractor must provide a sample of slump stone prior to construction for approval by the City Engineer. This supplemental agreement constitutes full and complete compensation for all labor, equipment, materials, overhead, profit, any and all indirect costs, and time adjustment to perform the above described changes. All other costs are non -compensable. The specifications, where pertinent, shall apply to all changes. ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE $65,334.35 TOTAL CHANGE TO CONTRACT PRICE Add $3,850.00 REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL $69,184.35 CHANGE TO CONTRACT TIME 20 Working Days • • Recommended: , 2002 Accepted: , 2002 Authorized: , 2002 Authorized: , 2002 2 Project Manager Contractor/Mariposa Horticultural Ent. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City Manager #15M (/5) CONT. AT EACH BOND BEAM TYP. SEE NOTE 14 TOP OF FOOTING ELEV. PER PLANS (TYP.) SLOPE CONTROL POINT 2x FOOTING BARS SM 0450 mm (14 O18' o.c.) E 1 300 mm 11,1 T ii Ir l 11 MORTAR CAP B —SEE NOTE 1 TYP. A —SEE NOTE 5 150 mm (6') MIN. m x4.0 I{ 11=1 r U 1 300 mm (12') TYPE 3 MORTAR CAP 115M (p5) CONT. AT EACH BOND BEAN TYP. SEE NOTE 14 tri SEE NOTE 3 hi E L SEE NOTE 1 TYP III SEE NOTE 5 50 mm (6') 514 0 450 mm o.c. 75 mm (3_) 1## 018' o.c.) CIR. (TYP.) W1 TYPE 1 • Pal (15) CONT. AT EACH BOND BEAM TYP. SEE NOTE 14 ,r. A 11 11 hi A II i • SEE NOTE 5 01=ui II III MORTAR CAP —SEENOTE 1 2Z SEE NOTE 3 300 mm (12') SLOPE CONTROL POINT j15m0450mm /4 018' o.o.) W2 N 300 mm (12") SLOPE CONTROL POINT 175 mm (3' O.R. (TYP.) SEE NOTE 2 LEVEL OR SLOPED 1:2 (V: H) WAX SEE NOTE 3 SEE NOTE 2 1 1 TYPE 2 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER PROMULGATED TAND THED PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS INC.. GREENBOOK COMMITTEE 1993 REV. 1996 REINFORCED CONCRETE BLOCK WALL STANDARD PLAN METRIC G O 1 - 1 �J SHEET 1 OF 4 USE WITH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION May 23, 2002 City Council Meeting May 28, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 02-1220-U - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING PARTIES ADVERTISED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF." Submitted for adoption and waiver of full reading is Urgency Ordinance No. 02-1220-U, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of May 14, 2002, the City Attorney was directed to prepare an urgency ordinance on this issue so the law will be in effect before the 4th of July. A regular ordinance was introduced at that meeting and is on tonight's agenda for adoption. Note : 7 Ste n I� Burrell, City Manager Elaine Doerfling, City Cle a • • ORDINANCE NO. 02-1220-U AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING PARTIES ADVERTISED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Title 9 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended by adding thereto a new Chapter 9.28 to read as follows: "Chapter 9.28 Prohibition Against Parties Advertised and Open to the Public Sections: 9.28.10 Parties Advertised and Open to Public Prohibited 9.28.10 Parties Advertised and Open to Public Prohibited It shall be unlawful for any person to conduct or hold in any residence any party or dance at which live or recorded music is provided which is open to the general public and: (1) for which admission is charged, or, (2) for which brochures, posters, or handbills advertising the party or dance are distributed, or other advertisement made or published, or, (3) for which a charge is made for refreshments. This section shall not apply to functions organized for a charitable, religious or political purpose." SECTION 2. The City is a popular destination and venue for parties on July 4th. During the last few years, enormous crowds have descended upon the City, straining its law enforcement resources and requiring extensive crowd management. Parties in private residences, particularly along the Strand, contribute to the law enforcement challenge, because they attract large numbers of people who consume alcoholic beverages and create noise and congestion on the Strand, the beach and adjoining public rights-of-way. The music and noise from these parties also often create a nuisance to adjoining property owners. -1- • • The City has become aware that some parties are advertised to the general public or require an admission charge or a charge for alcoholic beverages, thereby converting them into commercial venues, an activity that is illegal under the City's zoning ordinance. Further, these commercialized parties attract large numbers of people beyond the capacity of the homes, creating a potentially dangerous overcrowding condition that, when combined with alcohol consumption, leads to irresponsible and sometimes violent behavior. It is extremely difficult for law enforcement safely and effectively to manage these parties and maintain public peace and order. The 4th of July holiday will occur before this ordinance would ordinarily take effect. The immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety requires that this ordinance take effect immediately. In the absence of immediate effectiveness, the widespread advertising of parties to the general public and the improper use of private residences for commercial -type parties will create conditions dangerous to residents, visitors and law enforcement personnel and a nuisance to surrounding property owners. Accordingly, this ordinance is an urgency ordinance adopted pursuant to California Government Code Section 36937 and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of May, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney -2- May 22, 2002 City Council Meeting May 28, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 02-1220 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING PARTIES ADVERTISED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." Submitted for adoption and waiver of full reading is Ordinance No. 02-1220, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of May 14, 2002, the ordinance was presented to Council for consideration and was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Edgerton, Keegan, Reviczky, Y Mayor Dunbabin NOES: None - ABSENT: neABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Noted: Stephen R. Bur ity Manager • Elaine Doerfling, City 3b • • ORDINANCE NO. 02-1220 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING PARTIES ADVERTISED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Title 9 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended by adding thereto a new Chapter 9.28 to read as follows: "Chapter 9.28 Prohibition Against Parties Advertised and Open to the Public Sections: 9.28.10 Parties Advertised and Open to Public Prohibited 9.28.10 Parties Advertised and Open to Public Prohibited It shall be unlawful for any person to conduct or hold in any residence any party or dance at which live or recorded music is provided which is open to the general public and: (1) for which admission is charged, or, (2) for which brochures, posters, or handbills advertising the party or dance are distributed, or other advertisement made or published, or, (3) for which a charge is made for refreshments. This section shall not apply to functions organized for a charitable, religious or political purpose." SECTION 2. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 3. ordinance, shall enter The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make minutes -1- e • of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of May, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney -2- • ifirsv-7Pal Honorable Mayor Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 28, 2002 SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 01-19, PARKING PLAN 01-4, VARIANCE 01 -4 --CONTINUED FROM THE APRIL 9 MEETING LOCATION: 1605 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY APPLICANT: SHOOK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 220 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 110 IRVINE, CA q24/ REQUESTS: PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN EXPANSION AND REMODEL TO AN EXISTING RETAIL AND ENTERTAINMENT CENTER, "THE HERMOSA PAVILION;" PARKING PLAN FOR SHARED PARKING TO ACCOMMODATE A HEALTH AND FITNESS FACILITY IN CONJUNCTION WITH OFFICE AND RETAIL USES; VARIANCE TO THE 35' HEIGHT LIMIT TO ENCLOSE THE UPPER FLOOR OPEN DECK AREAS AND TO ADD FLOOR AREA ABOVE THE OPEN AREA OF THE PARKING STRUCTURE Planning Commission Recommendation To sustain the decision to approve the Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan subject to the conditions as contained in the attached resolution, and to sustain the decision to approve the Variance to enclose the upper floor deck areas and open area of the parking structure. Background At the meeting of April 9, the City Council continued the hearing on this matter and directed the applicant to consider a redesign of the front of the building, and to receive more detailed height calculations from staff. Project Information As presented previously, the applicant is proposing new construction and remodeling to expand and reconfigure the uses within the existing retail and entertainment center. The existing approved use and proposed uses are summarized as follows: Prior Approved Use Allocation Proposed Project Proposed Allocation P.C. Approved 5/02 Revision Health and Fitness Club 44,300 44,300 Theatre (6-Plex) 26,680 SF Office 48,990 49,080 Retail and Restaurant 46,180 SF Retail 12,088 15,050 Total 72,860 SF Total 105,378 SF 108,430 SF For further background and project information please refer to the April 9, 2002 staff report. Analysis In response to Council direction the applicant has redesigned the front of the building to create more of an entryway, and to use the former valet lane for landscaping. The new rounded glass enclosure in the center of the building is no longer designed to extend to the ground level, and instead is opened up on the first level to open up the entry. Existing columns that define the open entry are maintained, and raised planters providing substantial landscaping and mature palm trees are provided in front of the building on both sides of the open entry. The front facade has also been enhanced with new banding material at the mid-level of to tie in with the other new 5a features of the building. These changes have slightly modified the square footage of the building and the allocation as noted above'. VARIANCE / HEIGHT CALCULATION As noted previously, the project includes enclosing open deck areas and filling in areas around the existing roof structure which were originally set aside for outdoor uses, and enclosing the open area of the parking structure, while not increasing the level of the roof A Variance is required because the height limit was changed from 45 to 35 feet when the subject property was rezoned from C-3 to Specific Plan Area 8 in 1990 making most of the existing roof area over height, including the proposed enclosed spaces. The roof as currently built appears to comply with the 45 -foot height limit in effect when the project was originally built. However, the proposed built-up roof areas will result in some of the roof exceeding a 45 -foot height measurement, because the location of the built-up areas are on the lower side of the lot. The height calculations prepared for the project indicate that the proposed building height at the critical points varies from 6" to 5.6' over the 45 -foot height limit in effect when the building was constructed. (See the attached exhibits). As shown, the enclosure of the open deck areas at the west and southwest portions of the building exceed the current 35 -foot building height and exceed the 45 -foot height limit in effect at the time of construction, as follows: The enclosure of the open decks and the open area of the parking deck that are the subject of this . Variance would cause slightly less than 1/3 of the area of the roof to exceed the 45' height limit. These enclosed areas account for approximately 12,000 square feet of -the new interior floor area. Please refer to the April 9 staff report for the discussion of the Variance findings made by the Commission, which are also contained in the Commission's resolution of ap.rov CONCUR: Sol Blumenfel. Di ctor Community De elopment Department en Robertson Assoraiate Planner / %/ 1 St.���n'v: rrel�� City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution to sustain the Planning Commission decisions 2. Height Calculation exhibits, revised square footage calcs, revised parking analysis 3. April 9 Staff Report with attachments b95/cd/cc/pdp1605cont The change while reducing total building area, has reduced common area, and increased usable floor area for retail and office (see attached square feet calculations). Also see attached revised parking analysis showing these changes have a minimal impact on parking (438 peak parking demand rather than 429 under previous plan, with 450 spaces available.) 2- . Max Height 35' Height Limit Max Height 45' Height Limit Proposed Height Amt. Over 45' Height Critical Point 1 (SW corner of building, enclosure of open deck area) 119.19 129.19 134.8 5.61 Critical Point 2 (W edge of building enclosure of open parking area) 122.55 132.55 133.5 0.95 Critical Point 3 (S edge of building, top of new rounded roof feature) 128.37 138.37 142.5 4.13 The enclosure of the open decks and the open area of the parking deck that are the subject of this . Variance would cause slightly less than 1/3 of the area of the roof to exceed the 45' height limit. These enclosed areas account for approximately 12,000 square feet of -the new interior floor area. Please refer to the April 9 staff report for the discussion of the Variance findings made by the Commission, which are also contained in the Commission's resolution of ap.rov CONCUR: Sol Blumenfel. Di ctor Community De elopment Department en Robertson Assoraiate Planner / %/ 1 St.���n'v: rrel�� City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution to sustain the Planning Commission decisions 2. Height Calculation exhibits, revised square footage calcs, revised parking analysis 3. April 9 Staff Report with attachments b95/cd/cc/pdp1605cont The change while reducing total building area, has reduced common area, and increased usable floor area for retail and office (see attached square feet calculations). Also see attached revised parking analysis showing these changes have a minimal impact on parking (438 peak parking demand rather than 429 under previous plan, with 450 spaces available.) 2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PARKING PLAN, AS AMENDED, FOR AN EXPANSION AND REMODEL TO AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING, "THE HERMOSA PAVILION;" AND TO SUSTAIN THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO THE 35' HEIGHT LIMIT TO ENCLOSE THE UPPER FLOOR OPEN DECK AREAS AND TO ENCLOSE THE OPEN AREA ABOVE THE PARKING STRUCTURE AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1605 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. Applications were filed by Shook Development Corporation owner of property at 1605 Pacific Coast Highway, known as the "Hermosa Pavilion", seeking approval of a Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan to remodel and expand an existing commercial building and to allow shared parking to accommodate a new allocation of uses within the building including a health and fitness facility, office and retail uses, seeking a Variance to the 35 -foot height limit to enclose the upper floor open deck areas and to add floor area above the open area of the parking structure. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for a Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan and Variance on February 19, 2002, and based on the testimony and evidence, both written and oral, that was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission, approved the Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan subject to conditions as set forth in P.C. Resolution 02-8 and approved the Variance subject to conditions as set forth in P.C. Resolution 02-9. Section 3. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to reconsider the decision of the Planning Commission to approve the Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan and Variance on April 9, and May 28, 2002, and heard testimony and evidence, both written and oral, that was presented to and considered by the City Council, including modifications to the plan made by the applicant based on City Council input. Section 4. Based on the record of decision of the Planning Commission and the evidence received at the public hearing, the City Council makes the following factual findings pertaining to the application for a Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan Amendment: 1. The Hermosa Pavilion retail and entertainment complex was originally approved in 1986, with said approval consisting of a Parking Plan for shared parking and a Conditional Use Permit for a 6-plex movie theatre (Resolution P.C. 86-40). The applicant is proposing changes to the allocation of uses summarized as follows: 1 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Prior Approved Use Allocation Proposed Project Proposed Allocation Health and Fitness Club 44,300 Theatre (6-Plex) 26,680 SF Office 49,080 Retail and Restaurant 46,180 SF Retail 15,050 Total 72,860 SF Total 108,430 SF 2. The existing 6 -level parking structure will be reconfigured to contain 450 parking spaces (334 standard, 116 compact size) with an additional 31 spaces if tandem parking is used and up to 514 spaces with valet assistance in the existing six -level parking structure. 3. The site is zoned S.P.A. 8 which requires a Precise Development Plan for a remodel and expansion project that exceeds 10,000 square feet and exceeds a floor areas to lot area ratio of 1:1. A Parking Plan is necessary to amend the existing approved shared parking arrangement in order to comply with the parking requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 5. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan Amendment: 1. The project is consistent with applicable general and specific plans, and is in compliance with the use and development requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The site is zoned S.P.A. 8, Specific Plan Area -Commercial, and the project and proposed use complies with the development standards contained therein. 3. Pursuant to Section 17.44.210 of the Zoning Ordinance, a reduction in the number of parking spaces required is acceptable due to the proposed mix of uses with varying peak hours of parking needs. Parking demand is projected to be satisfied by the supply within the parking structure due to the proposed new mix of uses with varying times of peak parking demand. The applicant has submitted a Shared Parking Analysis, prepared by Linscott Law and Greenspan (dated May 22, 2002) to demonstrate that the parking will be sufficient for the proposed mix of uses. The shared parking analysis shows that the proposed supply of 450 spaces is adequate to meet peak parking demand, based on projected hourly parking counts for the health and fitness club (derived from a similar operation in Costa Mesa), plus projected parking needs of the office and retail uses (based on City parking requirements). Further the 450 spaces can be supplemented with parking management. 4. Compliance with the conditions of approval will mitigate any negative impact resulting from the issuance of the Precise Development Plan. 5. The City Council concurs with the Planning Commission based on the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, based on their environmental 2 1 • • assessment/initial study, that this project will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 6. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby approves the subject Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans reviewed by the City Council at their meeting of May 28, 2002. Modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 2. To ensure compliance with the Parking Plan for shared parking the allocation of uses within the building shall be substantially consistent with the following allocation: Allocation(in square feet) Health and Fitness Facility (including 44,300 a basketball court and pool) Office 49,080 Retail 15,050 Total 108,430 Any change to this allocation requires amendment to the Parking Plan, and approval of the Planning Commission. 3. A parking operation plan shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of the building permit for the Health and Fitness Facility, ensuring maximum use of parking structure consistent with the Shared Parking Analysis (prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan, dated January 23, 2002 and revised May 22, 2002), and to ensure efficient ingress and egress to and from the structure. The parking structure shall be operated in accordance with said plan. a) A minimum of 450 single use and 30 dual use (tandem) parking spaces shall be available within the structure for employees and customers of all tenants within the building, and all parking shall be available on a first come first serve basis (i.e. no assigned parking except that tandem spaces may be assigned to employees). b) The applicant shall certify the adequacy of parking supplies and the efficiency of the parking operation program six -months after occupancy of the Health and Fitness Facility with a report submitted to the Community Development Department by the applicant's traffic engineer verifying adequate on-site parking is available. If supplies are found to be inadequate, the applicant shall provide valet assisted parking, and a detailed valet assistance program shall be provided to the City. 3 s 1 • • c) A lighting and security plan, including possible use of security personnel shall be reviewed and approved by the Police Department to ensure that the parking structure is well lit and safe for the patrons prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Architectural treatment including sign locations shall be as shown on building elevations and site and floor plans prior to issuance of building permits. Any modification shall require approval by the Community Development Director. 5. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Department and the Public Works Department. 6. Final building plans/construction drawings including site, elevation, floor plan, roof plan (with all required roof -top equipment), sections, details, signage, landscaping and irrigation, submitted for building permit issuance shall be reviewed for consistency with the plans approved by the Planning Commission and the conditions of this resolution, and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. a. The landscape plans shall include landscaping along Pacific Coast Highway and street trees and shall be consistent with the conceptual landscape plans approved by the City Council and the original landscape plans approved for the Hermosa Pavilion, subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director. b. Project plans shall include insulation to attenuate potential noise problems with surrounding residential uses. 7. All exterior lights shall be located and oriented in a manner to insure that neighboring residential property and public right-of-way shall not be adversely effected. 8. Bicycle racks shall be provided in conveniently accessible locations to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and the Community Development Director 9. The project and operation of the businesses shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 10. A Variance for exceeding the maximum height shall be required for the proposed enclosure and roofing of additional floor area. 11. The Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. 12. Each of the above Conditions of Approval is separately enforced, and if one of the Conditions of Approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. 4 6 • • 13. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 14. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. 15. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions Section 7. Based on the record of decision of the Planning Commission and the evidence received at the public hearing, the City Council Commission makes the following factual findings ;with respect to the Variance request: 1. As part of an overall remodel and expansion to an existing retail entertainment center, the applicant desires to enclose open deck areas located within gaps between existing enclosed spaces at the upper level originally set aside for outdoor uses (dining, open corridors). The building height is not being increased above existing roof heights at these locations, however, the Variance is needed because the height limit was changed from 45 to 35 feet when the subject property was rezoned from C-3 to Specific Plan Area 8 in 1990. 2. The applicant also desires to enclose open deck areas located on the southern and western side of the building and to add floor area above the open area of the parking structure at the southwestern corner of the building. This enclosure and added floor will exceed the existing building height since the deck railing and wall of the parking structure represent the highest point of the building along this edge. 3. The Variance is being requested in conjunction with a substantial remodel and expansion to an existing retail and entertainment center, "The Hermosa Pavilion" to accommodate a health and fitness facility, office and retail space. Section 8. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Variance: 5 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • 1. There are exceptional circumstances relating to the property due to the combination of the site conditions, and the open deck design on the upper floor of the building. The lot contains a fairly steep slope (a grade change of 20 feet between the upper portion on Pacific Coast Highway and westerly lower side) and is already significantly built -out to its near maximum potential with a height to its highest point (measured from the sloping grade) of about 40 feet at the front, and height of 45 feet at the back even though the back portion of the building is stepped 12 feet down feet from the highest point of the roof on the front. The original design of the building contains an open deck design on the upper level and compromises the utility of the building it was anticipated that restaurants would occupy these spaces. Most of these areas could have been enclosed at the time of original construction if an alternate use required enclosure of these areas such as the fitness club. 2. The Variance is necessary for the enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the vicinity because as the property owner is seeking to retrofit a building in order to use a portion of a largely vacant building for a viable economic purpose. This viable use that is a substantial property right (given that the building is already in place) would otherwise be denied by strict application of the height limit. 3. The requested Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity because as it permits the enclosure of gaps between existing roof lines and will negligibly effect the visual appearance of the building, and will not effect any views. Also, the enclosure of these deck areas which could be used for outside dining under the current plan will actually be beneficial to nearby residential uses as it will attenuate potential noise impacts. 4. The proposed Variance does not conflict with and is not detrimental to the General Plan as it does not result in material damage to surrounding properties, and is also consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. The General Plan encourages viable economic uses along the Commercial Corridor, and also encourages compatibility between commercial and residential uses. 5. The Planning Commission concurs with the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, based on their environmental assessment/initial study, that this project will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 9. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby sustains the Planning Commission decision to approve the Variance subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The project shall be consistent with submitted plans. Any minor modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 2. The Variance is specifically limited to the situation and circumstances that result relative to the proposed expansion and remodeling of the existing structure and is not applicable to the development of new structures or any future expansion. 6 1 • • Section 10. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan and Variance shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. The Planning Commission may review this Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan and Variance and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. Section 11. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 any legal challenge to the decision of the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 2002, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 7 i Pavilion2 Page 1 /0 The Pavilion 05/21/2002 Elev. Pt. A 82.97 Elev. Pt. A 82.97 Elev. Pt. B 102.9 Elev. Pt. B 102.9 Length A -B 290 Length A -B 290 Length A -AB' 14 Length A -AB' 14 Elev. AB': 1 83.9321379 Elev. AB': 83.9321379 Elev. Pt. C 88.7 Elev. Pt. C 88.7 Elev. Pt. D 111.02 Elev. Pt. D 111.02 Length C -D 290 Length C -D 290 Length C -CD' 14 Length C -CD' 14 Elev. CD': 89.7775172 Elev. CD': 89.7775172 Length AB' -CD' 300.4 Length AB' -CD' 300.4 Length AB'-CP1 13 Length AB'-CP1 186 Elev. CP1: 84.1851004 Elev. CP1: 87.5514474 Height Limit 35 Height Limit 35 Max. Hgt. @ CP1: 119.1851 Max. Hgt. @ CP2: 122.55145 Elev. Pt. A 82.97 Elev. Pt. B 102.9 Length A -B 290 Length A -AB' 147 Elev. AB': 93.0724483 Elev. Pt. C 88.7 Elev. Pt. D 111.02 Length C -D 290 Length C -CD' 147 EIev.CD`. 100.013931 Length AB' -CD' 300.4 Length AB'-CP1 13 Elev. CP1: 93.3728453 Height Limit 35 Max. Hgt. @ CP3: 128.372845 Page 1 /0 HERMOSA BEACH P VIL1 N Pacific Coast Highway at 16th Street 35' height limit)119.19 45' height limit) 129.19 ht 134.8 NOTE- SHADED AREA INDICATES NEW BUILT-UP ROOFS NOTE SHADED AREA INDICATES NEW BUILT-UP ROOTS Ew SKUGHI NOTE. SHADED AREA INDICATES �� BRTST.IIBE 1.(,w NEW BUIT-TIP RCUNi PROFILE VAULT NEW SLEUGHT- BRISOJIE GABLED 'RIDGELI'E' MODEL HDM WITH TINTED DUAL GLAZING E PROPOSED ROOF PLAN June 27, 2001 Keis €r Wge Archtecfi 05/22/02 11:47 $9493760 KEISKER & WIGGLE HERMOSA SF CALCULATIONS •RVCEivED u001/00-1 MAY 2 2 2002 DEPT Uvrvt. Ut4, SQUARE FOOTAGE PER LATEST PLAN 5/22/02 24 HOUR i OFFICE RETAIL I COMMON 2,765 TOTAL UPPER LEVEL 17,399 49,080 69,244 STREET LEVEL 15,851 15,050 j 1,974 32,875 LOWER LEVEL 11,050 i 1,172 12,222 TOTALS 44,300 49,080 15,050 j 5,911 114,341 SQUARE FOOTAGE PER 1/20/02 PLAN 24 HOUR OFFICE RETAIL COMMON TOTAL UPPER LEVEL j 17,069 - 48,990 2,983 69,042 STREET LEVEL 16,181 12,088 5,396 33,665 LOWER LEVEL 1 -11,050 1,172 12,222 TOTALS 44,300 48,990 12,088 9,551 114,929 _ (588) DIFFERENCES I 90 - 2,962 (3,640) 1 05/22/02 10:46 TX/RX N0.4004 P.001 05/22/02 WED WE 15:10 F 626 792 0941 LLG PASADENA • s ENGINEERS ENGINEERS & PLANNERS ■ TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION, PARKING 234 East Colorado Blvd., `•uite 400 • Pasadena, California 91101 Phone: 626 796-2322 • Fax: 626 792-0941 May 22, 2002 Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group 220 Technology Drive, Suite 110 IrVine, California 92618 Philip M. linscon, P.E. (1924.20001 jack M. Greenspan, P.E. William A. Law, P.E (Ret.) Paul W. Wilkinson, P.E. John P. Kealing, P.E. David S. Shender, P.E. John A. Boarman, P.E. Clare M. took -Jaeger, P.E. RECEIVE® MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT Subject: Parking Study Report - Hermosa Beach Pavilion 1650 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach, California Dear Gene: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, is pleased to submit this parking study report in connection with the existing l lermosa Beach Pavilion building and associated parking structure at 1650 Pacific Coast Highway, in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. It is our understanding that the project as detailed in this letter report is being submitted to the City of Hermosa Beach staff for review. Based on your direction, this parking study report has been prepared to analyze the Hermosa Beach Pavilion project as described below. Summary We find that the 3n -site parking supply of 450 standard parking spaces is sufficient to meet the projected parking demand. This is based on a shared parking analysis which takes into account the hourly variation iii parking demand of the planned health club, office and retail uses. The proposed project will utilize the 450 standard parking spaces only. As a contingency, if additional parking spaces are needed, the 31 tandem parking spaces and the 33 parallel parking spaces will be available for use with attendant assistance. Based on the proposed project, the peak parking demand is expected to occur on weekdays with 438 occupied spaces .it 5:00 PM. The peak parking demand is expected to occur during the week primarily as a result of the office component of the project along with the 24 -Hour Fitness facility. <.:uo1a :s ese - 714 641-15.17 • Sail Dido • 619 299-4090 • Las Vegas • 702 451 -1920 • Funded 1966 • An 162W8 Company I3 05/22/02 WED 15:11 FAX 1 626 792 0941 LLc rASALLINA Imo_ LINSCOTT LAW & GREENS1 AN ENGINEERS Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group May 22, 2002 Page Two It is anticipated that monthly parking passes will be available for the office personnel, the 24 -Hour Fitness staff and the retail employees. As a contingency, these employees will be encouraged to park in the tandem parking spaces. The monthly passes for the tandem parking spaces are expected to be priced at a discount over the monthly passes for the standard parking spaces. Thus, it is expected that parking passes for the tandem spaces will be purchased by office personnel, 24 -Hour Fitness staff and/or retail employees. Currently, without the tandem parking spaces, a parking surplus of 12 spaces is expected during the weekday peak parking demand. The addition of 31 tandem parking spaces on weekdays will increase the expected parking surplus to 43 spaces. Further, should the demand for the discounted monthly passes exceed the supply of tandem parking spaces, the parallel parking spaces can be utilized with additional attendant assistance. This will further increase the expected supply of available parking spaces. The addition of 33 parallel parking spaces on weekdays will increase the expected parking surplus to 76 spaces. Proposed Project The proposed pro,ect includes a total of 114,341 gross square feet of building floor area on three floors (i.e., the lower level, street level and upper level). The proposed project includes a 24 -Hour Fitness facility with a total of 44,300 net square feet split among the three levels, retail use with a total of 15,050 net square feet on the street level only and office use with a total of 49,080 net square feet on the upper level only. The common area comprises a total of 5,911 net square feet. The proposed project allocation is displayed on Table A, located at the rear of this letter report. A copy of the project site floor plan for all three levels, provided by Keisker & Wiggle Architects Inc., is included in Appendix A. The proposed project includes 450 standard parking spaces. If necessary, attendant assistance will be provided for parking vehicles in 31 tandem parking spaces and 33 parallel parking spaces thereby increasing the total parking supply to 481 and 514 parking spaces, respectively. However, these spaces are not currently proposed to be utilized. Trip Generation Comparison A trip generation comparison was prepared that examined the trip generated by the previous use, the previously approved project (from July, 1999), and the proposed project. The trip generation comparison and a list of the trip generation rates are provided in Appendix B. As shown in the trip generation comparison table (i.e., Table 1), the proposed project is expected to generate fewer trips than either the previous use or the previously approved project. 05/22/02 WED 15:12 F ' 626 792 0941 LLG PASADENA • 1®004 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Code Parking Requirement Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group May 22, 2002 Page Three The City of Hermosa Beach Code parking requirements for the proposed project are displayed on Table B. As shown. on Table B, direct application of the City Code produces a requirement of 699 parking spaces for the proposed project. However, it is recognized that the City Code parking factors represent the peak parking requirement for each individual use, and do not take into account the hourly variation in parking demand generated by different land uses. Further, fitness facility parking rates have typically decreased in recent years as more facilities incorporate uses that allow fewer members per square foot (such as basketball courts and swimming pools). Thus, a fitness facility parking demand analysis is included as part of this letter report. 24 -Hour Fitness Parking Demand To determine the hourly parking demand generated by a 24 -Hour Fitness facility at the Hermosa Beach Pavilion, a similar 24 -Hour Fitness facility in Costa Mesa was analyzed. A door count of the 24 -Hour Fitness facility in Costa Mesa was conducted and recorded hourly from 6:00 AM until 7:00 PM on a typical weekday in mid-August, 2001. The peak period for the Costa Mesafacility was determined to occur at 5:00 PM when 263 vehicles were parked. Based on a facility size of 45,000 square feet and in. luding a parking circulation factor of ten percent, the parking demand ratio for the 24 -Hour Fitness facility in Costa Mesa was calculated to be 6.43 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of building floor area. The parking demand ratio calculated above is less than the City Code requirement of 10 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet and is more consistent with the typical layout of modem fitness facilities. To be conservative, a fitness facility parking demand ratio of 6.75 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet (i.e., approximately one parking space per 150 square feet) was utilized for this parking study. Shared Parking Demand Analysis The shared parking demand analysis takes into account the hourly variation in parking demand of the planned 24 -Hour Fitness facility, the office use and the retail use. The peak parking demand for the 24 -Hour Fitness and office uses occurs during the week, which is analyzed in Table C. This analysis is based on the methodology and hourly parking adjustment factors developed by the Urban Land Institute (ULU), and on the 24 -Hour Fitness parking data (i.e., the parking demand ratio and the hourly parking adjustment factors) developed for the Costa Mesa facility. 05/22/02 WED 15:13 F i•626 792 0941 LLG PASADENA 4100.5 9 • UNSCOTT' LAW (St GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group May 22, 2002 Page Four The key measures for the shared parking demand analysis are the hourly parking adjustment factors, the hourly parking demand generated by each use, the hourly shared parking demand and the hourly parking surplus or deficiency (if any). For this analysis, the hourly parking surplus or deficiency is measured against the planned supply of 450 parking spaces (i.e., including the 450 standard parking spaces and excluding the 31 tandem and 33 parallel parking spaces). As shown on Table C, the weekday peak shared parking demand for the proposed project is in the evening. At 5:00 PM, a need for 438 parking spaces is projected, leaving a 12 space surplus (based on a supply of 450 parking spaces). AA indicated above, the 450 standard parking spaces are expected to satisfy the peak parking demand for the proposed project. However, there may be an opportunity to utilize the tandem (and if necessary the parallel) parking spaces during the week when the peak parking demand is primarily a result of the office component. If necessary, discounted monthly parking passes for the tandem (and parallel) parking spaces can be provided to the office personnel, 24 -Hour Fitness staff and retail employees. This will increase utilization of the tandem and parallel parking spaces thereby increasing availability of the standard parking spaces for office visitors, 24 -Hour Fitness members and retail patrons Findings and Conclusions Based on he shared parking analysis, we project a peak parking demand of 438 spaces for the proposed project during the week. With an on-site parking supply of 450 standard parking spaces, we conclude that sufficient parking is provided to meet the expected demand for the proposed project. • The tandem and parallel parking spaces are not required for the proposed project as the 450 standard parking spaces will provide a parking supply that satisfies the weekday peak parking demand. 1lowever, attendant assistance can be provided during the week thereby increasing the parkin_; supply to 481 spaces through the use of the tandem parking spaces. It is expected that discos inted monthly parking passes can be provided to attract office personnel, 24 -Hour Fitness stl.ff and retail employees to utilize the tandem parking spaces. • If necessary, the parallel parking spaces can be utilized during the week with additional attendant assistance increasing the parking supply to 514 spaces. This will further increase the availability of the standard parking spaces for office visitors, 24 -Hour Fitness members, and retail patrons. rc� 05/22/02 �D 15:13 FA 626 792 0941 LLG PASADENA • 4U006 I LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group May 22, 2002 Page Five We welcome the opportunity to be of further service. Should there be any questions regarding this parking study report for the Hermosa Beach Pavilion project, please do not hesitate to call me at 626.796.2322, or contact me directly via e-mail at greenspan@llgengineers.com. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers k M. Greenspan, P.E. rincipal JMG/MSH:ci Attachments c: Mr. Richard Garland, City of Hermosa Beach Traffic Engineering Department Mr. Ken Robertson, City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department O:UOB FILE\3024\052202.3024RPT.WPD 7 05/22/02 WED 15:14 FAX 626 792 0941 LLG PASADENA 1¢J 097 LINSCOTT LAW (St GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Table A SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOCATION [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion VD, LLI LUVL LOCATION 24-HOUR FITNESS GENERAL RETAIL GENERAL OFFICE COMMON AREA TOTAL Lower Level 11,050 SF 0 SF 0 SF , 1,172 SF 12,222 SF Street Level 15,851 SF 15,050 SF 0 SF 1,974 SF 32,875 SF . Upper Level 17,399 SF 0 SF 49,080 SF 2,765 SF 69,244 SF TOTAL NET 44,300 SF 15,050 SF 49,080 SF 5,911 SF 114,341 SF [1]Source: Keisker & Wiggle Architects Inc. (8 05/22/02 WED 15:14 FA 626 792 0941 LLG PASADENA • e�uuts LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Table B CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENT [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion U IL I Vvc PROPOSED USE SIZE CODE REQUIREMENT REQUIRED PARKING 24 -Hour Fitness 44,300 SF 1 space per 100 SF 443 spaces General Retail 15,050 SF 1 space per 250 SF 60 spaces yGeneral Office 49,080 SF 1 space per 250 SF 196 spaces TOTAL 108,430 SF 699 spaces [11 Parking code requirements per City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. �9 05/22/02 WED 15:14 FAX 1 26 792 0941 L(NSCOTT' LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS LLG PASADENA 400.9 Table C WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion ubTzuzuuL LAND USE [31 24-HOUR FITNESS 4 GENERAL RETAIL 4 GENERAL OFFICE SHARED PARKING DEMAND [71 PARKING SURPLUS OR DEFICIENCY SIZE [2] PARKING RATE 44.30 KSF 6.75 IKSF [5] . 15.05 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] 60 SPACES 49.08 KSF 4.00 IKSF [6] 196 SPACES GROSS SPACES 299 SPACES TIME OF DAY % OF PEAK # OF SPACES % OF PEAK # OF SPACES % OF PEAK # OF SPACES 6:00 AM 31% 93 0% 0 3% 6 99 351 7:00 AM 31% 93 8% 5 20% 39 137 313 8:00 AM 26% 78 18% 11 63% 123 212 238 9:00 AM 32% 96 42% 25 93% 182 303 147 10:00 AM 32% 96 68% 41 100% 196 333 117 11:00 AM 40% 120 87% 52 100% 196 368 82 NOON 47% 141 97% 58 90% 176 375 75 1:00 PM 29% 87 100% 60 90% 176 323 127 2:00 PM 25% 75 97% 58 97% 190 323 127 3:00 PM 35% 105 95% 57 93% 182 344 106 4:00 PM 60% 179 87% 52 77% 151 382 68 _ 5:00 PM 100% 299 79% 47 47% 92 438 12 45 357 93 6:00 PM 88% 263 82% 49 23% 7:00 PM 81% _ 242 89% 53 7% 14 309 141 _ 8:00 PM 57% 39% 170 87% 61% 52 7% 14 236 214 37 3% 6 160 290 _ 9:00 PM 117 344 _ . _ .. 10:00 PM 27% 81 32% 19 3% 6 106 11:00 PM_ MIDNIGHT 0% 0 13% 8 0% 0 8 442 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 450 PARKING NEED NEED WITHOUT WITH SHARED USE 438 SPACES PARKING SHARED USE 555 SPACES 01:45 PM NOTES. [1] Based on methodologies presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute. 1983. [2] Based on information provided by Keisker & Wiggle Architects Inc. [3) Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages from studies by LLG, including the 24 -Hour Fitness facility in Costa Mesa. [4] Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute, 1983. [5) Based on parking studies of the 24 -Hour Fitness facility in Costa Mesa by LLG. [6] Based on the City of Hermosa Beach Off -Street Parking Municipal Code. [7) Based on a proposed parking supply of 450 spaces (i.e., including 450 standard spaces and excluding 31 tandem and 33 parallel parking spaces). 05/22/02 WED 15:15 rA7C,626 792 0941 LLG PASADENA Q UIU Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX A Project Site Floor Plan r PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL PLAN NA IL:m] wgge ncfilect. wi• Vis: 01 J H ERM O S A REACH YA.V1L10N Parilir Com 11iShsas el 161h Sired Hermosa Bead% Gllbrna SHOOK DEVELOPMENT 0 N PV 0 VNHUVSVd DTI •••44,•41111111111*40, PROPOSED STREET LEVEL FLOOR PLAN . r 1� abs 4. at,. HERMOSA 8 E A C H PAVILION PKIEc Cavil Miahwa! h IEIh Street Hermosa leads. California NM AY. SNOOK DEVELOPMENT J VNaUVSVd DTI 6 C H n w .1.'11111611111 nm 4111111111 ilio. PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN • >r 21 2tt`2 • 0, 1 HERMOSA B EAC H PAVILION Pacific Coast Highway at 1611, Street Hermosa (cath. Callornis SHOOK DEvELOPPrENT VN3aYSVd Dli 05/22/02 WED 15:18 F 626 792 0941 LLG PASADENA • g1014 Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX B Trip Generation Comparison 05/22/02 WED 15:18 FAX,626 792 0941 LLG PASADENA ors LINSCOTT IAN & GREENSPAN E N G I NEER S Table 1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion LAND USE SIZE DAILY TRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 12] ' PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES [2] IN OUT I TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Previous Use AMC Theatre [3] 26,680 GSF 2,134 3 3 6 120 51 171 Retail [4] 27,680 GLSF 1,188 17 11 28 50 54 104 Restaurant [5] 18,500 GSF 2,411 89 82 171 121 80 201 • SUBTOTAL 72,860 GSF 5,733 109 96 205 291 185 476 7/99 Protect (Expired) Fitness Club [6] 44,476 GSF 1,779 43 28 71 96 64 160 Retail [4] 64,121 GLS1 5,122 75 48 123 225 244 469 SUBTOTAL 108,597 GSF 6,901 118 76 I 194 , 321 i 308 629 Proposed Use Fitness Club [6] 44,300 GSF 1,772 43 28 71 95 64 159 Retail [4] 15,050 GLSF 646 9 6 15 27 29 56 Office [7] 49,080 GSF 540 67 ` 9 76 12 61 73 SUBTOTAL 108,430 GSF 2,958 119 43 I 162 134 I 154 288 NET NEW TRIPS (PROPOSED USE (2,775) 10 (53) (43) (157) (31) (188) LESS PREVIOUS USE) 1 NET NEW TRIPS (PROPOSED USE (3,943) 1 I (33). (32) (187) (154) (341) LESS 7/99 PROJECT) I [1] Sources: ITE "Trip Generation; 6th Edition, 1997 and SANDAG "Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates," 1993. [2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. [3] SANDAG Land Use RECREATION (Theaters[Multiplex]) trip generation rates. [4] ITE Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center) average trip generation rates. [5] ITE Land Use Code 832 (Sit -Down Restaurant) average trip generation rates. [6] SANDAG Land Use RECREATION (Racquetball/Health Club) trip generation rates. 171 ITE Land Use Code 710 (General Office Building) average trip generation rates. 05/22/02 WED 15:18 F 626 792 0941 LLG PASADENA • la 016 LINSCOTT Li\W & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Table 2 TRIP GENERATION RATES (1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion SOURCE CODE SANDAG OR ITE LAND USE TRIP RATE AND PERCENTAGE DAILY [2] TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR [2] PM PEAK HOUR [2I TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT SANDAG CODE RECREATION Theaters[Multiplex] 80.00 0.24 50% 50% 6.40 70% 30% RECREATION Racquetball/Health Club 40.00 1.60 60% 40% 3.60 60% 40% ITE CODE LAND USE 710 General Office Building 11.01 1.56 88% 12% 1.49 17% 83% LAND USE 820 Shopping Center 42.92 1.03 61% 39% 3.74 48% 52% LAND USE 832 Sit -Down Restaurant 130.34 9.27 52% 48% 10.86 60% 40% [1] Sources: ITE "Trip Generation," 6th Edition, 1997 and SANDAG "Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates," 1993. [2] Daily, AM, and PM peak hour totals are trips per 1,000 SF. e 2-7 VACATION OF A PORTION OF EIGHTH STREET BETWEEN T STRAND AND HERMOSA AVENUE. Memorandum from Public orks Di : tor Harold Williams dated March 27, 2002. Public WorDirector Williams presented the staff repoand responded to Council questio City Manager Burrell and Ci a ttorney Jenkins also ' responded to Counci estions. The public hearing opened at 7:55 P. this issue was: Diane last name indi ct - He of the prop • ed vacation. The public hearing cl d at 7:59 P.M. g forward to address the Council on osa Beach, asked about the effect Actio•. Mayor Dunbabin directed, with the consensus of the ouncil, that t - resolution be presented for adoption when the deeds are corn. -ted, as recommended this evening by staff. c. REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF THE PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PARKING PLAN FOR ALTERATIONS TO AN EXISTING RETAIL AND ENTERTAINMENT CENTER TO ACCOMMODATE OFFICES, A HEALTH AND FITNESS CLUB, AND RETAIL USES, AND A VARIANCE TO THE 35' HEIGHT LIMIT TO ENCLOSE EXISTING DECK AREAS TO MATCH THE HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING ROOF, AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1605 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HERMOSA PAVILION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 1, 2002. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. z: The public hearing opened at 8:07 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this issue were: Jerry Wiggle - Keisker & Wiggle Architects, reviewed the proposal, noting that the new plan incorporated valet parking service in the parking garage, with the drop off and retrieval at the same place; said the original drop-off area in front of the building would be cemented in, but the deceleration lane on Pacific Coast Highway would be retained; Gene Shook - president of Shook Development, property owner, said it would be dangerous to use the front of the building for valet parking service or as a drop-off and pick-up area; said the building should have had at least parking spaces; said they would require employees to use tandem spaces; City Council Minutes 04-09-02 Page 10800 • • Kevin McGuire - commercial retail broker, said the proposal would work with a reasonable amount of parking, noting that tenants liked vibrancy; said 24 -Hour Fitness was anxious to get into the new facility; and Shirley Cassell - Hermosa Beach, opposed granting a height variance; said there would be no sales tax from the proposed fitness club and office usage. The public hearing closed at 9:05 P.M. Proposed Action: To grant the height variance for the envelope of the building to even out the height on the east side to match the height of the existing roof. Motion Edgerton, second Yoon. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Keegan, Reviczky and Mayor Dunbabin. Preliminary Action: To direct a redesign to the front of the building by eliminating the proposal to extend the building forward, and instead creating more of an entryway, and to use the valet lane for landscaping purposes. Motion Edgerton, second Keegan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Action: To continue the item to the second meeting in May for the purposes of receiving height calculations from staff and of receiving from the applicant a redesign of the front of the building per the previous motion, with the public hearing continued open to allow for public comment on those issues. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. meeting recessed at 9:42 P.M. The = -ting reconvened at 10:04 P.M. d. TEXT NDMENT FOR FRONT YARD REQUIREMENT - ' N THROUGH LOTS BE EN THE STRAND AND THE SERVIC ' OAD PARALLEL TO HERMOSA ENUE APPROXIMATELY B EEN 27TH STREET AND 35TH STREET. ► emorandum from Co nity Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated Apn 2002. Community Development Director menfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions The public hearing opened at :20 P.M. As no one e forward to address the Council, the public hearin• • osed at 10:20 P.M. Action: T. . pprove the staff report to waive full reading . nd introduce Ordinan - No. 02-1218, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF TH ITY OF HE OSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 17.46. OF E ZONING ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE FRONT YA City Council Minutes 04-09-02 Page 10801 • • April 1, 2002 Honorable Mayor Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 2002 SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: REQUESTS: RECONSIDERATION OF PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 01-19, PARKING PLAN 01-4, AND VARIANCE 01-4 1605 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY SHOOK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 220 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 110 IRVINE, CA 90025 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN EXPANSION AND REMODEL TO AN EXISTING RETAIL AND ENTERTAINMENT CENTER, "THE HERMOSA PAVILION;" PARKING PLAN FOR SHARED PARKING TO ACCOMMODATE A HEALTH AND FITNESS FACILITY IN CONJUNCTION WITH OFFICE AND RETAIL USES; VARIANCE TO THE 35' HEIGHT LIMIT TO ENCLOSE THE UPPER FLOOR OPEN DECK AREAS AND TO ADD FLOOR AREA ABOVE THE OPEN AREA OF THE PARKING STRUCTURE Planning Commission Recommendation To sustain the decision to approve the Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan subject to the conditions as contained in the attached resolution, and to sustain the decision to approve the Variance to enclose the upper floor deck areas and open area of the parking structure. Project Information The applicant is proposing new construction and remodeling to expand and reconfigure the uses within the existing retail and entertainment center. The existing approved use and proposed uses are summarized as follows: Prior Approved Use Allocation Proposed Project Proposed Allocation Health and Fitness Club 44,300 Theatre (6-Plex) 26,680 SF Office 48,990 Retail and Restaurant 46,180 SF Retail 12,088 Total 72,860 SF Total 105,378 SF ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: LOT SIZE: FLOOR AREA RATIO: SPA 8 - Specific Plan Area Commercial Corridor 19,460 Square Feet 1.25 5 0 PARKING PROVIDED: • 450 spaces -334 standard, 116 compact 481 (if 31 tandem spaces used) Up to 514 with valet parking ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Recommended Negative Declaration The Hermosa Pavilion was constructed in 1987. At that time the building was constructed in compliance with zoning requirements in effect at that time, which included a height limit of 45 feet. The intended use was a mix of theatre, restaurant and retail uses. The building is currently vacant, and only the theatre and a small portion of the retail and restaurant uses were occupied. At their meeting of February 19, 2002, the Planning Commission granted approval of the Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan by a 4:1 vote subject to conditions as contained in the attached Planning Commission Resolution. The project was approved based on the shared parking analysis, and the changes that increased retail square footage and reduced parking demand conflicts between the health club and office uses. The Variance was approved by a 3:2 vote based on findings as contained in the attached Planning Commission Resolution. The findings involved consideration of topography of the steeply sloping site and the reuse and utility of the existing building. The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of January 10, 2002 considered the environmental impacts of the proposed project, and based on the initial study check -list (attached), recommended a mitigated Negative Declaration. The finding that parking and traffic impacts are less than significant was based on an amended and updated parking and traffic analysis prepared by Linscott, Law, and Greenspan. The project and allocation of space yithin the building has been slightly modified since the initial study, slightly increasing the square footage of each use but also increasing the parking supply by 10 spaces. These changes are minor and do not require modifying the initial study. Project History ❑ July, 1986: Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan for shared parking were originally approved for theater, retail and office use with valet assisted parking. (Total square feet 72,860 - Theatre 26,680, retail and restaurant, 46,180) ❑ January, 1999: The Planning Commission approved a Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan for shared parking and Variance for expansion and remodel to the Hermosa Pavilion to accommodate a health and fitness center and expanded retail floor area, and to allow enclosure of the upper deck to exceed the height limit. (Total square feet 99,150 - Theatre 26,680, retail and restaurant 26,280, health club, 46,190) ❑ July, 1999: The Commission approved an amendment to above project with the theatre use eliminated and additional retail floor area. (Total square feet 108,597 — health club 44,476, retail 64,121) The project was never implemented and the Precise Development Plan expired. ❑ August, 1999: The Planning Commission approved a Variance, as amended, for the expanded enclosure of the upper deck. ❑ July, 2001: The City Council concurred with the Planning Commission and denied a project application to expand and remodel the facility under a revised development 2 3/ i program with Total square feet 106,000—office 56,000, health club 45,000 and retail 5,000. The Council concurred with the Commission decision to deny a slightly larger project. o The 1999 approvals for the Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan, and Variance have all expired. o At their meeting of February 19, 2002 the Planning Commission approved the requested Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan, and Variance, for the new development program, which is the subject of this reconsideration. Analysis The proposed plan revision involves interior alterations and additions to remove restaurant and theaters uses and replace them with the health and fitness club, offices, and retail at the ground floor. The fitness club will include a pool and basketball court and will be similar to the "24 - Hour Fitness Club" in Costa Mesa identified as a similar facility in the applicant's parking study. The building frontage will be extended to the street edge at the ground level and the upper floor deck areas and open corridors will be enclosed. Additional floor area is proposed above the open area of the parking deck at the northwest corner of the building. PARKING Parking is projected to be satisfied with the existing supply within the parking structure due to the proposed new mix of uses with varying times of peak parking demand. The applicant has submitted a revised and updated Shared Parking Analysis (dated January 25, 2002), prepared by Linscott Law and Greenspan. The shared parking analysis demonstrates that the existing parking supply will be sufficient for the proposed mix of uses based upon peak and off-peak usage. Barking spaces within the parking structure will be striped to provide 450 parking spaces (334 standard size, and 116 compact size). If necessary, attendant assistance could be provided for parking vehicles in 31 tandem spaces and 33 parallel aisle -parking spaces, for a possible total of 514 spaces. The original project of 72,860 square feet was approved with 540 parking spaces. (474 standard and compact, and 66 valet assisted) The analysis shows that based on the City's parking requirements the proposed mix of uses results in a total aggregate parking requirement of 687 spaces (Table B). This calculation is based on net floor area, and excludes common areas/internal circulation within the office area. This calculation, however, does not take into account the peak parking requirements and hourly variation in parking demand for each individual use in a mixed-use project. Therefore, the study includes a shared demand parking analysis based on the methodology and hourly parking adjustment factors developed by the Urban Land Institute (Table C and D). The parking demand rates used for the health club are less than the code required 1 space per 100 square feet and are instead based on a study of a 24-hour fitness facility in Costa Mesa in August, 2001 (6.75 spaces required per 1000 square feet at peak times). The parking rates for the office and retail uses are based on the parking requirements in the Zoning Code (4 spaces per 1,000 square feet). The study states that the 45,000 square foot health club with similar uses in Costa Mesa generated a parking demand of 6.43 spaces per 1,000 square feet. To be more conservative a factor of 6.75 was used in the subject study. 3 Parking Tabulation: Proposed Use Allocation Code Requirement Number Peak Shared Weekday 5:00 P.M Fitness Club 44,300 SF 10 per 1000 sq. ft 443 299* Retail 12,088 SF 4 per 1000 sq. ft 48 38 Office 48,990 SF 4 per 1000 sq. ft 196 92 Total 105,378 SF 687 429 *Based on parking rate of 6.75 spaces per 1000 square feet. The City's Traffic Engineer reviewed this parking study, and found the theory and premise of the shared parking analysis acceptable, but questions the transferability of the parking demand rates found in Costa Mesa for the health club analyzed, which are less than the City's parking requirements. His conclusion is that the study is valid only if it can be confirmed that the facility used for comparison has similar membership and patronage, and is in a similar type of location where most of the patrons will drive to the facility. Staff has investigated the Costa Mesa club and found that it is a similar type of fitness club with similar amenities and very close in size to the proposed club. Both structured and surface parking is available. The location near the 405 and 55 Freeways, however, is not comparable as it is in a high employment commercial district while a residential community surrounds the proposed location. On a Thursday, February 2, 2002 staff found that the facility and the immediate area was very congested and parking was not readily available in the surface parking lot near the fitness club. However, it should be noted that parking was available on the top floor of the parking structure and in surface lots further from the club. The parking demand study of the Costa Mesa facility was limited to an analysis of demand rates to be used in the ULI shared parking analysis. It is not intended to verify or support the shared parking relationships and adjustment factors developed by ULI, nor is it intended to serve as an example of how the parking relationships will work on this site. The transferability of the demand rates to this location are also limited, as described above, because the immediate surroundings differ. If anything, the demand at the Costa Mesa location would probably peak earlier in the afternoon because of its proximity to more employment sites, while here the peaks may occur later in the afternoon and evenings since the facility is closer to the patrons homes. Further information and details regarding the parking demand study of the Costa Mesa club are attached. The conclusion of the shared parking analysis for the project is that the highest shared parking demand occurs weekdays at 5:00 P.M. for the combination of uses and is projected at 429 spaces and is satisfied by the on-site supply of 450 spaces. While the supply can be increased to 514 spaces with tandem and valet assisted parallel parking behind the standard stalls the increased supply is unnecessary given the parking needs of this project. The study does indicate that these extra parking spaces could be made available during weekdays when parking demand is largely due to the office use, by the use of discount parking passes to office personnel and other employees. 4 33 1 • PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT/ S.P.A. 8 ZONE COMPLIANCE The Specific Plan Area zone includes two sets of development standards. This two tier approach was established to allow development that complies with the first tier standards as a matter of right without a Precise Development Plan. In this case, the project exceeds first tier standards for bulk (greater than 1:1 F.A.R.), and maximum size (greater than 10,000 square feet). Thus, the Precise Development Plan review is required for the project to exceed these first tier standards. Also, the plan requires a Variance, as previously granted, to exceed maximum building height. Pursuant to the specific standards of the S.P.A. 8 zone and the underlying C-3 zoning, other than the need for approval of a Parking Plan to comply with parking requirements and a Variance to comply with height, the project conforms with the S.P.A. 8 zoning requirements. As described in the previous PDP for this project, the proposed revised expansion is generally within the existing building footprint (a portion of the building entry will be reconfigured and is achieved by remodeling within the building, and enclosing some outdoor deck areas). The remodeling includes converting a large portion of existing retail and restaurant spaces for use as an office or the health and fitness club; converting the existing service loading and storage areas to a pool and basketball court; and, adding internal stairways to internally connect the three level health and fitness club. On the most visible elevations on P.C.H. and 6th Street, the building facade is to be completely remodeled. A contemporary design is, proposed to replace an existing eclectic mix of rooflines and materials. The proposed design includes curved architectural features, storefront glass and standing seam arched metal roof to help articulate the building facade. These improvements are carried to the south and east building elevations. The proposed plan revisions are consistent with the previously approved project design. The new proposed plan revisions modify the central retail corridor/arcade and eliminate the escalators. The second floor retail corridor/arcade would also be modified and reduced for the office level. These changes result in a total of 30,000 square feet more of interior space than the 1987 plan. No additional building coverage, reduction of landscaping, or changes to building setbacks are proposed. The building contains only nominal landscaping on the P.C.H. frontage which is nonconforming to4andscape standards of S.P.A. 8. Existing building setbacks adjacent to residential uses are 14 feet from the rear property line and 12 feet from the north side property line. The parking structure is proposed to be maintained with respect to overall parking supplies but will be improved and made more attractive with new lighting, paint, directional signing and new striping under the revised plans. Conditions of approval are included to ensure that the parking area is well lit and secure, based upon police department review of a security plan for the facility. The impact on local traffic was also evaluated by Linscott, Law and Greenspan, and it was found that the expected trip generation for the proposed project is less than half of the potential that could have been generated if the 1987 approved project was ever fully realized (2,830 total trips for the current proposal, vs. 5,733 for the approved mix of uses under the 1987 plan) The trips generated during the P.M. peak hour was found to be approximately 60% of the trips under the 1987 approved plan (278 P.M. peak hour trips for the current plan as compared to 5 3t/ 476 potential under the 1987 project.). The high number of trips for the 1987 project was partially due to the expected restaurant uses that never materialized. VARIANCE In order to grant a Variance the following findings must be made: 1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, limited to the physical conditions applicable to the property involved. 2. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question. 3. The granting of the Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located 4. The Variance is consistent with the General Plan The project includes enclosing open deck areas located within gaps between existing enclosed spaces at the upper level originally set aside for outdoor uses (dining, open corridors). The building height is not being increased above existing roof heights at these locations. However, a Variance is required because the height limit was changed from 45 to 35 feet when the subject property was rezoned from C-3 to Specific Plan Area 8 in 1990 making most of the existing roof area over height, including the proposed enclosed spaces. t The Variance is also needed to exceed the existing building height along the western side of the building. Currently the deck railing, and top of the wall of the open area of the parking structure represent the highest points of the building along this edge. The enclosure of these exterior spaces is being requested to maximize the utility of the building for the upper floor office space. The enclosure of the open decks and the open area of the parking deck that are the subject of this Variance account for approximately 12,000 square feet of new interior floor area. Discussion of findings made by the Commission: Staff believes there are two distinct parts to the Variance request: 1) The part involving enclosing existing open decks already surrounded on at least two sides by fully enclosed spaces, not increasing the height of the building; and, 2) The part involving the enclosure located along the west edge of the building which increases the building height relative to the sloping maximum height line. Each of these portions should be addressed with respect to required findings. Finding 1. The lot contains a fairly steep slope (a grade change of 20 feet between the upper portion on Pacific Coast Highway and westerly lower side) and is already significantly built -out 6 3.- • • to its near maximum potential. To its highest point (measured from the sloping grade) the building measures about 40 feet at the front, and height of 45 feet at the back, even though the back portion of the building is stepped down from the highest point of the roof on the front. The building is thus currently nonconforming to the 35 -foot height limit. The original design of the building contains open deck areas on the upper level, which have not shown any economic utility since the building was completed. It was anticipated that restaurants would occupy these spaces. These areas could have been enclosed at the time of original construction if an alternate use required enclosure of these areas such as the fitness club. The combination of the site conditions and the open deck design on the upper floor of the building were found to be exceptional and extraordinary by the Planning Commission. Finding 2. The property owner is seeking to retrofit a building in order to exercise a property right to use a portion of an existing vacant building for a viable purpose. Use of the existing upper floor deck is arguably a property right (given that the building is already in place) which would otherwise be denied by strict application of the height limit. Making this finding for the portion of the building that increases the building height is more difficult since deck areas could be maintained for the health and fitness club, and/or the total interior square footage of the health and fitness club could be reduced at this upper floor. However the applicant has argued that the proposed development program is the minimum project that can be successfully developed given the existing building configuration and the site. Finding 3. The portion of the Variance, which does not increase the existing height of the building, as it encloses gaps between existing rooflines, will clearly not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. It will negligibly effect the visual appearance of the building, and will not effect any views. Also, the enclosure of these deck areas, which could be used for outside dining under the current plan, will actually be beneficial to nearby residential uses, as it will attenuate potential noise impacts. This finding is tempered by the condition that a portion of the project will actually increase the building height and be visible from properties located to the southeast of the building. The view analysis provided by the applicant, however, shows the view impacts will not be substantial, and arguably not material. The interior clearance from floor to ceiling at the western end of the building is proposed to be 10 feet, and as high as 12 -feet, to keep a consistent roofline. As such, it would be possible to reduce the ceiling height to reduce the overall visual impact, but that would result in a less satisfactory building roof line and building architecture. Finding 4. If it is determined pursuant to Finding 3 that the proposed Variance does not result in material damage to surrounding properties, then it is also consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. The General Plan encourages viable economic uses along the Commercial Corridor, and also encourages compatibility between commercial and residential uses. 7 36 The Commission reviewed the findings shown in the staff report, discussed the original findings for 1999 project approval involving enclosure of the upper floor deck, and noted that the enclosed deck areas were not materially different from the project Variance approved previously. Based upon their review of the findings and conditions of the building and site, the Commission approved the Variance. CONCUR: Sol Blumen eld, Director Communit Development Department Stephe► u.''rrell City Manager en Ro s ertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution to sustain the Planning Commission decisiions. 2. P.C. Resolution for Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan 3. P.C. Resolution for Variance 3. Location Map 4. Negative Declaration & Initial Study 5. Parking and Traffic Study 6. Parking demand study of the Costa Mesa facility 7;. Correspondence b95/cd/cc/pdp1605 8 37 • r - (E) COLUMNS 1 w C� C a,,,,_,4 , ,, � r 0.4 slyoulm.? (1 P- r--1:-.1 v v i „,:Red . . *It* FRONT OF (E) TILE GABLE ROOF tl PROPOSED FOOTPRINT (E) FOOTPRINT (E) OVERHANG /� REQ'D SIDEWALK / PROPERTY LINE EDGE • (E) SIGN ` (E) VALET LANE CURB PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PAVILION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18k 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PARKING PLAN, AS AMENDED, FOR AN EXPANSION AND REMODEL TO AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING, "THE HERMOSA PAVILION;" AND TO SUSTAIN THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO THE 35' HEIGHT LIMIT TO ENCLOSE THE UPPER FLOOR OPEN DECK AREAS AND TO ENCLOSE THE OPEN AREA ABOVE THE PARKING STRUCTURE AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1605 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. Applications were filed by Shook Development Corporation owner of property at 1605 Pacific Coast Highway, known as the "Hermosa Pavilion", seeking approval of a Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan to remodel and expand an existing commercial building and to allow shared parking to accommodate a new allocation of uses within the building including a health and fitness facility, office and retail uses, seeking a Variance to the 35 -foot height limit to enclose the upper floor open deck areas and to add floor area above the open area of the parking structure. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for a Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan and Variance on February 19, 2002, and based on the testimony and evidence, both written and oral, that was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission, approved the Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan subject to conditions as set forth in P.C. Resolution 02-8 and approved the Variance subject to conditions as set forth in P.C. Resolution 02-9. Section 3. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to reconsider the decision of the Planning Commission to approve the Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan and Variance on April 9, and May 28, 2002, and heard testimony and evidence, both written and oral, that was presented to and considered by the City Council, including modifications to the plan made by the applicant based on City Council input. Section 4. Based on the record of decision of the Planning Commission and the evidence received at the public hearing, the City Council makes the following factual findings pertaining to the application for a Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan Amendment: 1. The Hermosa Pavilion retail and entertainment complex was originally approved in 1986, with said approval consisting of a Parking Plan for shared parking and a Conditional Use Permit for a 6-plex movie theatre (Resolution P.C. 86-40). The applicant is proposing changes to the allocation of uses summarized as follows: SUPPLEMENTAL Sti 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18! 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Prior Approved Use Allocation Proposed Project Proposed Allocation Health and Fitness Club 44,300 Theatre (6-Plex) 26,680 SF Office 49,080 Retail and Restaurant 46,180 SF Retail 15,050 Total 72,860 SF Total 108,430 SF 2. The existing 6 -level parking structure will be reconfigured to contain 450 parking spaces (334 standard, 116 compact size) with an additional 31 spaces if tandem parking is used and up to 514 spaces with valet assistance in the existing six -level parking structure. 3. The site is zoned S.P.A. 8 which requires a Precise Development Plan for a remodel and expansion project that exceeds 10,000 square feet and exceeds a floor areas to lot area ratio of 1:1. A Parking Plan is necessary to amend the existing approved shared parking arrangement in order to comply with the parking requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 5. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan Amendment: 1. The project is consistent with applicable general and specific plans, and is in compliance with the use and development requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The site is zoned S.P.A. 8, Specific Plan Area -Commercial, and the project and proposed use complies with the development standards contained therein. 3. Pursuant to Section 17.44.210 of the Zoning Ordinance, a reduction in the number of parking spaces required is acceptable due to the proposed mix of uses with varying peak hours of parking needs. Parking demand is projected to be satisfied by the supply within the parking structure due to the proposed new mix of uses with varying times of peak parking demand. The applicant has submitted a Shared Parking Analysis, prepared by Linscott Law and Greenspan (dated May 22, 2002) to demonstrate that the parking will be sufficient for the proposed mix of uses. The shared parking analysis shows that the proposed supply of 450 spaces is adequate to meet peak parking demand, based on projected hourly parking counts for the health and fitness club (derived from a similar operation in Costa Mesa), plus projected parking needs of the office and retail uses (based on City parking requirements). Further the 450 spaces can be supplemented with parking management. 4. Compliance with the conditions of approval will mitigate any negative impact resulting from the issuance of the Precise Development Plan. 5. The City Council•concurs with the Planning Commission based on the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, basedon their environmental i 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1e' 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 assessment/initial study, that this project will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 6. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby approves the subject Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans reviewed by the City Council at their meeting of May 28, 2002. Modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 2. To ensure compliance with the Parking Plan for shared parking the allocation of uses within the building shall be substantially consistent with the following allocation: Allocation(in square feet) Health and Fitness Facility (including 44,300 a basketball court and pool) Office 49,080 Retail 15,050 Total 108,430 Any change to this allocation requires amendment to the Parking Plan, and approval of the Planning Commission. 3. A parking operation plan shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of the building permit for the Health and Fitness Facility, ensuring maximum use of parking structure consistent with the Shared Parking Analysis (prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan, dated January 23, 2002 and revised May 22, 2002), and to ensure efficient ingress and egress to and from the structure. The parking structure shall be operated in accordance with said plan. a) A minimum of 450 single; use and 30 dual use (tandem) parking spaces shall be available within the structure for employees and customers of all tenants within the building, and all parking shall be available on a first come first serve basis (i.e. no assigned parking except that tandem spaces may be assigned to employees). b) The applicant shall certify the adequacy of parking supplies and the efficiency of the parking operation program six -months after occupancy of the Health and Fitness Facility with a report submitted to the Community Development Department by the applicant's traffic engineer verifying adequate on-site parking is available. If supplies are found to be inadequate, the applicant shall provide valet assisted parking, and a detailed valet assistance program shall be provided to the City. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 c) A lighting and security plan, including possible use of security personnel shall be reviewed and approved by the Police Department to ensure that the parking structure is well lit and safe for the patrons prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Architectural treatment including sign locations shall be as shown on building elevations and site and floor plans prior to issuance of building permits. Any modification shall require approval by the Community Development Director. 5. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Department and the Public Works Department. 6. Final building plans/construction drawings including site, elevation, floor plan, roof plan (with all required roof -top equipment), sections, details, signage, landscaping and irrigation, submitted for building permit issuance shall be reviewed for consistency with the plans approved by the Planning Commission and the conditions of this resolution, and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. a. The landscape plans shall include landscaping along Pacific Coast Highway and street trees and shall be consistent with the conceptual landscape plans approved by the City Council and the original landscape plans approved for the Hermosa Pavilion, subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director. b. Project plans shall include insulation to attenuate potential noise problems with surrounding residential uses. 7. All exterior lights shall be located and oriented in a manner to insure that neighboring residential property and public right-of-way shall not be adversely effected. 8. Bicycle racks shall be provided in conveniently accessible locations to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and the Community 'Development Director 9. The project and operation of the businesses shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 10. A Variance for exceeding the maximum height shall be required for the proposed enclosure and roofing of additional floor area. 11. The Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. 12. Each of the above Conditions of Approval is separately enforced, and if one of the Conditions of Approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18' 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 13. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense.•If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 14. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. 15. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and anylaw, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions Section 7. Based on the record of decision of the Planning Commission and the evidence received at the public hearing, the City Council Commission makes the following factual findings with respect to the Variance request: 1. As part of an overall remodel and expansion to an existing retail entertainment center, the applicant desires to enclose open deck areas located within gaps between existing enclosed spaces at the upper level originally set aside for outdoor uses (dining, open corridors). The building height is not being increased above existing roof heights at these locations, however, the Variance is needed because the height limit was changed from 45 to 35 feet when the subject property was rezoned from C-3 to Specific Plan Area 8,1n 1990. 2. The applicant also desires to enclose open deck areas located on the southern and western side of the building and to add floor area above the open area of the parking structure at the southwestern corner of the building. This enclosure and added floor will exceed the existing building height since the deck railing and wall of the parking structure represent the highest point of the building along this edge. 3. The Variance is being requested in conjunction with a substantial remodel and expansion to an existing retail and entertainment center, "The Hermosa Pavilion" to accommodate a health and fitness facility, office and retail space. Section 8. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Variance: 1 • 1. There are exceptional circumstances relating to the property due to the combination of site conditions and the open deck design on the upper floor of the building. The lot is exceptional in that it is severely sloping with an average slope differential of 21.15', as measured from the corner point elevations, which is more excessive than any other commercial lot in the vicinity and zone. The building is constructed to its near maximum height of 45', although it is stepped down 12 feet from the highest point of the roof at the rear of the property. The original building construction includes substantial portions of open deck on the upper level, which compromises the utility of the building, as it was originally designed for open patio seating. Consequently, the severely sloping site and the existing design of the building are unique and exceptional and should be considered relative to the reuse and development of the property. 2. The Variance is necessary for the enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the vicinity because the property owner is seeking to retrofit the building for reuse and a viable purpose. The retro -fit requires enclosing the upper level open deck. Strict application of the height limit would, in this instance, severely restrict full reuse of the existing building, since the upper deck could not be enclosed. This would deny the owner the opportunity for full use of the property and deny a substantial property right possessed by others in the vicinity and zone. 3. The Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare of injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity because it permits enclosure of gaps between existing roof lines and will negligibly effect the visual appearance of the building and will not effect any views. Also the enclosure of these deck areas which could be used for outside dining under the current plan will actually be beneficial to nearby residential uses as it will attenuate potential noise impacts. 4. The Variance does not conflict with and is not detrimental to the General Plan as it does not result in material damage to surrounding properties and is also consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. The General Plan encourages viable economic uses along the Commercial Corridor and encourages compatibility between commercial and residential uses. Section 9. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby sustains the Planning Commission decision to approve the Variance subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The project shall be consistent with submitted plans. Any minor modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 2. The Variance is specifically limited to the situation and circumstances that result relative to the proposed expansion and remodeling of the existing structure and is not applicable to the development of new structures or any future expansion. Section 10. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. 1 The Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan and Variance shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully' in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. The Planning Commission may review this Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan and Variance and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. Section 11. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 any legal challenge to the decision of the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 2002, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY • FITNESS@ May -28T-2002 To: City of Hermosa Beach From: Bill Oughton, Director of Real Estate, 24 Hour Fitne Re.: Proposed Hermosa Beach 24 Hour Fitness 24 Hour Fitness would be prepared to build an Ultra Sport facility in the City of Hermosa Beach, under the right economic deal with the developer/landlord. An Ultra Sport is typically larger than a Sport club at 60,000 to 80,000 square feet and typically has the following upgrades: Executive Locker Rooms Towel Service Squash Courts Racquetball Courts Juice Bar Tanning facilities Expanded Kids Club The finish packages in an Ultra Sport are significantly higher quality than a Sport club. 575 Anton Boulevard, Suite 700 • Costa Mesa, CA 92626 • (800) 411-7410 • Fax (800) 866-9178 05/28/Q2 TU36 FAX 1 6.26 792 0941 LLG PASADENA Lp.1uu1 • • LINSCO LAW& GREENS 1 FAX COVER PAGE ENGINEERS ENGINEERS & PLANNERS - TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION, PARKING 234 East Colorado Boulevard, Suite 400 Pasadena, California 91101-2212 Phone: 626.796.2322 Faa.: 626.792.0941 Email: greenspan@llgengineers.com FAX MULTIPLE MESSAGE COVER SHEET Costa Mesa 714.641.1587 San Diego 619.299.3090 Las Vegas 702.451.1920 Date: 28May02 Project: Time: Hermosa Beach Pavilion From: Jack Greenspan J?ji Job No. 1-01-3124-1 Pages: 3 (including cover) TO THE FOLLOWING: Name: Fax No. Gene Shook 949-450-0500 Company: ITC Recipient No: Name: Fax No. Gary Wiggle 949-388-2760 Company: Keisker & Wiggle Recipient No: Name: Fax No. Company: Recipient No: Name: Fax No. Company: Recipient No: Name: Fax No. Company: Recipient No: MESSAGE Gene/Gary: Here is the revised Table C for a 68,000 SF 24 -Hour Fitness parked at 5.5 spaces/1000 SF and at 5.0 spaces/1000 SF, with a supply of 481 spaces (450 first access + 31 valet assisted tandem spaces). We will not send this to the City until you have determined which rate to go forward with, and authorized release to the City. See you tonight. 05/28/02 TUE 09:37 FAX 1 626 792 0941 LLG PASADENA IJuu2 COTT ENSPAN. ENCINEERS Table C WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion - - - LAND USE [3] 24-HOUR FITNESS [4] GENERAL RETAIL [4] GENERAL OFFICE SHARED PARKING DEMAND [7] PARKING SURPLUS OR DEFICIENCY SIZE [2] PARKING RATE 68.00 KSF 5.50 /KSF [51 374 SPACES 15.05 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] 60 SPACES 25.38 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] 102 SPACES GROSS SPACES TIME OF DAY % OF PEAK # OF SPACES % OF PEAK # OF SPACES % OF PEAK # OF SPACES 6:00 AM 31% 116 0% 0 3% 3 119 362 7:00 AM 31% 116 8% 5 20% 20 141 340 8:00 AM 26% 97 18% 11 63% 64 172 309 9:00 AM 32% 120 42% 25 93% 95 240 241 10:00 AM 32% 120 68% 41 100% 102 263 218 11:00 AM 40% 150 87% 52 100% 102 304 177 NOON 47% 176 97% 58 90% 92 326 155 1:00 PM 29% 108 100% 60 90% 92 260 221 2:00 PM 25% 94 97% 58 97% 99 251 230 3:00 PM 35% 131 95% 57 93% 95 283 198 4:00 PM 60% 224 87% 52 77% 79 355 126 5:00 PM 100% 374 79% 47 47% 48 469 12 6:00 PM 88% 329 82% 49 23% 23 401 80 7:00 PM 81% 303 89% 53 7% 7 363 118 8:00 PM 57% 213 87% 52 7% 7 272 209 9:00 PM 39% 146 61% 37 3% 3 186 295 10:00 PM 27% 101 32% 19 3% 3 123 358 11:00 PM 0% 0 13% 8 0% 0 8 473 MIDNIGHT 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 481 PARKING NEED WITH SHARED USE 469 SPACES PARKING NEED WITHOUT SHARED USE 536 SPACES NOTES: [1] Based on methodologies presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute, 1983. [2] Based on information provided by Keisker & Wiggle Architects Inc. [3] Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages from studies by LLG, including the 24 -Hour Fitness facility in Costa Mesa. [4] Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land institute, 1983. [5] Based on parking studies of the 24 -Hour Fitness facility in Costa Mesa by LLG. Adjusted to account for executive club layout. [6] Based on the City of Hermosa Beach Off -Street Parking Municipal Code. [7] Based on a proposed parking supply of 481 spaces (i.e., including 450 standard spaces and 31 tandem parking spaces). 05/28/02 TUE 09:37 FAX 1 626 792 0941 l� Corr ENSPAN E N C. 1 N E E R S LLG PASADENA g003 Table C WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion LAND USE 24-HOUR FITNESS GENERAL RETAIL GENERAL OFFICE SHARED PARKING DEMAND PARKING SURPLUS OR DEFICIENCY SIZE [2] PARKING RATE 68.00 KSF 5.00 /KSF [5] 340 SPACES 15.05 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] 60 SPACES 25.38 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] 102 SPACES GROSS SPACES TIME OF DAY % OF PEAK # OF SPACES % OF PEAK # OF SPACES % OF PEAK # OF SPACES 6:00 AM 31% 105 0% 0 3% 3 108 373 7:00 AM 31% 105 8% 5 20% 20 130 351 8:00 AM 26% . 88 18% 11 63% 64 163 318 9:00 AM 32% 109 42% 25 93% 95 229 252 10:00 AM 32% 109 68% 41 100% 102 252 229 11:00 AM 40% 136 87% 52 100% 102 290 191 NOON 47% 160 97% 58 90% 92 310 171 1:00 PM 29% 99 100% 60 90% 92 251 230 2:00 PM 25% 85 97% 58 97% 99 242 239 3:00 PM 35% 119 95% 57 93% 95 271 210 4:00 PM 60% 204 87% 52 77% 79 335 146 5:00 PM 100% 340 79% 47 47% 48 435 46 6:00 PM 88% 299 82% 49 23% 23 371 110 7:00 PM 81% 275 89% 53 7% 7 335 146 8:00 PM 57% 194 87% 52 7% 7 253 228 9:00 PM 39% 133 61% 37 3% 3 173 308 10:00 PM 27% 92 32% 19 3% 3 114 367 11:00 PM 0% 0 13% 8 0% 0 8 473 MIDNIGHT j 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 481 PARKING NEED WITH SHARED USE 435 SPACES PARKING NEED WITHOUT SHARED USE 502 SPACES NOTES [1] Based on methodologies presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute, 1983. [2_ Based on information provided by Keisker & Wiggle Architects Inc. [3 Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages from studies by LLG, including the 24 -Hour Fitness facility in Costa Mesa. [4: Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute, 1983. [5- Based on parking studies of the 24 -Hour Fitness facility in Costa Mesa by LLG. Adjusted to account for executive club layout. [6 Based on the City of Hermosa Beach Off -Street Parking Municipal Code, [7 Based on a proposed parking supply of 481 spaces (i.e., including 450 standard spaces and 31 tandem parking spaces). 05/20/2002 00:14 3103761822 i STUDIO ARCHITECTURE Patrick J. Killen A.I.A. May 20, 2002 Department of Community Development Sol Blumenfeld City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Re: Scotty's on the Strand. Restaurant 1100 The Strand Hermosa Beach, Ca Dear Sol, STUDIO 90NE2 (7 n,cV rl11iE l� 1 • „5/7.{0,) -- RECEIVIM MAY 2 Q 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. I would like to request a continuance for the Appeal of the Planning Commission decision. Peter and I are investigating other alternatives to mitigate some of the concerns raised by the Planning Commission. We feel with some additional time might allow us to better answer these issues. Therefore, we would like to set this issue aside on the Council's calendar until the second meeting of July 2002.. We would like to thank you for assistance in processing this request If you have any questions regarding any of these issues please do not hesitate to call Co 310.376.9171. Respectfully submitted, Pab46k J. Killen AIA 46 ELEVENTH STREET • HERMOSA BEACH • CALIFORNIA 90254 • TEL. 310/378.9171 • FAX. 310/376-1822 05/20/02 11:18 TX/RX NO.3980 5b May 21, 2002 30-0D___, Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 28, 2002 SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MINOR AMENDMENT 02-4 205 PIER AVENUE WON SAM & KATSUKO Y. AHN ALTA-DENA DAIRY 205 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE A REQUEST TO CHANGE HOURS OF OPERATION OF AN EXISTING MARKET WITH OFF -SALE BEER AND WINE FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 10:00 P.M. TO 8:00 A.M.TO 12 MIDNIGHT SUNDAY THROUGH THURSDAY, AND TO 2:00 A.M. FRIDAY AND SATURDAY. Planning Commission Recommendation To sustain the Commission's decision to approve the request to change hours of operation. Background At their meeting of April 16, 2002, the Planning Commission voted 4:1 to approve the subject request, citing that no record or registered complaints existed in connection with the business operation. Staffs recommendation was to approve the C.U.P. minor amendment subject to Standard conditions of approval, and review of the project by the Planning Commission in six months to determine if any violation of the conditions of approval and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code has occurred. PROJECT INFORMATION: ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: C-2, Restricted Commercial General Commercial Categorically Exempt Class 1 Finding On July 12, 1983, the City Council granted a Conditional Use Permit for the sale of beer and wine in conjunction with a market at this location. On October 16, 1990, the Planning Commission approved a CUP Amendment request to extend the hours of operation to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and add 250 square feet. The property is located on the northeast corner of Manhattan and Pier Avenues with commercially zoned property to the north and east. The drive- thru dairy use has been in operation at the subject location since 1981. Sc • • Analysis The existing use is appropriate to the commercial zoning and the General Plan. The applicant is requesting to extend the hours of operation for the subject drive-thru dairy use from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily to 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. (midnight) Sunday through Thursday and 2:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday. Section 17.26.030 of the Hermosa Beach Zone Code requires Conditional Use Permit approval for off -sale alcohol establishments in all commercial zones if such establishments stay open between 11:01 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. The drive-thru dairy stays open until 10:00 p.m. daily as a condition of their existing C.U.P. even though current land use regulations allow off -sale alcohol establishments by right in all commercial zones to close at 11:00 p.m. There are two similar uses nearby, Abe's Liquor and Food Bar (formerly Simpson's Market), which have Conditional Use Permits allowing them to stay open past 11:00 p.m. every night of the week. The use is conforming to current parking requirements, providing 8 parking spaces (2 regular and 6 drive-thru spaces) when only 4 spaces are required. Also, there are no police reports of business complaints. Therefore, the majority of the Planning Commission felt that extending the hours of operation for the use, as mitigated with conditions in the attached resolution, will not be detrimental to the surrounding residential neighborhood and is compatible with surrounding commercial uses. These conditions of approval include adequate staffing to prevent loitering and littering, noise control, and review of the project by the Planning Commission in six months to determine if any violation of the conditions of approval and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code has occurred. 1 knor Scott ceford CONCUR: Sol Blumef- d, I irector Community evelopment Department I'll Stephe'R : urre 1, City Manager Planning Assistant Attachments 1. Draft Resolution to sustain the Commission's approval 2. P.C. Minutes / Resolution 3. Location Map 4. Correspondence SUcup205pier 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • RESOLUTION 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MINOR AMENDMENT TO CHANGE HOURS OF OPERATION OF AN EXISTING MARKET WITH OFF -SALE BEER AND WINE FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 10:00 P.M. TO 8:00 A.M. TO 12 MIDNIGHT SUNDAY THROUGH THURSDAY, AND 2:00 A.M. FRIDAY AND SATURDAY FOR 205 PIER AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 49, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH TRACT Section 1. An application was filed by Won Sam & Katsuko Y. Aim, seeking a minor amendment to an existing conditional use permit to change hours of operation of an existing market with off -sale beer and wine from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. to 8:00 A.M. to 12 midnight Sunday through Thursday, and to 2:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit on April 16, 2002, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the appeal of the application for the Conditional Use Permit on May 28, 2002, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the City Council. Section 4. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The business is currently operating under the terms of a Conditional Use Permit, as amended, approved in 1990, for on -sale alcohol (beer/wine) in conjunction with a market with hours of operation from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. daily. 2. The property is zoned C-2, with commercially zoned property to the north and east. Section 5. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings pertaining to the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit: 1. The site is zoned C-2, and is suitable for the proposed use with the proposed amendment for extended hours with off -sale alcohol; 2. The proposed use with extended hours is compatible with surrounding commercial uses; 3. The imposition of conditions as required by this resolution will mitigate any negative impacts on nearby residential or commercial properties; 4. The amendment is Categorically Exempt from the requirement for an environmental assessment pursuant to Section 15301 class 1 (involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing) of the California Environmental Quality Act. -1- 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • Section 6. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby sustains the approval for the Conditional Use Permit minor amendment subject to the following Conditions of Approval; 1. The plans shall remain in substantial conformance with plans submitted and approved at the October 16, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. 2. Operating hours shall be limited to between 8:00 A.M. and 12:00 A.M. Sunday through Thursday, and 2:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday. 3. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 4. The business shall provide adequate staffing, management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, littering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business and in nearby public areas. 5. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments. 6. The exterior of all the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained free of graffiti at all times. 7. The operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 8. The operation of the business shall be reviewed in six months. Any violation of the Conditions of approval and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be grounds for a public hearing for revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. Section 7. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed a the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. The City Council may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. Section 8. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby sustains approval of a Conditional Use Permit minor amendment to an existing conditional use permit to change hours of operation of an existing market with off -sale beer and wine from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. to 8:00 A.M. to 12 midnight Sunday through Thursday, and to 2:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 28th day of May 2002 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY -3- ON by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to applicant - - t. The following roll call vote reflected unanimous ap AYES: Hoffma NOES: None ABSTAIN: N ABS ► . one enboom, Pe • - zer, Tucker e denial: Chairman Perrotti recessed the meeting at 8:55 P.M. and reconvened the meetm:. ' :06 P.M. 9. CUP 02-4 -- Conditional Use Permit minor amendment to change hours of operation of an existing market with off -sale beer and wine from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. to 8:00 A.M. to 12 midnight Sunday through Thursday, and to 2:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday at 205 Pier Avenue, Alta -Dena Drive -In Dairy. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Director Blumenfeld explained that the applicant is proposing to extend his hours of operation for the existing drive-through dairy from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. daily to 8:00 A.M. to 12 midnight Sunday through Thursday and until 2:00 A.M. on Friday and Saturday; stated that some of the surrounding businesses in the area are permitted to stay open past 11:00 P.M. during the week; advised that both letters in support and in opposition to the applicant's request have been provided to the Planning Commission; and noted that staff does not foresee the extension of hours as a problem. Director Blumenfeld stated that there are issues with how the site will be managed and that conditions should be included to deal with loitering, littering and noise control; and suggested that if this request is approved, that there be a 6 -month review period following approval to determine if the applicant is in compliance with the CUP. He added that there is no additional gross floor area being added to the business; and advised that no formal complaints have been made regarding noise or loitering at this business nor has Code Enforcement staff found a problem during a recently scheduled weekend evening inspection. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing in regard to this matter. Won Sam, 205 Pier Avenue, owner/operator of the dairy, stated that one-third of his business is done during the daytime hours and that the rest is done during the evening hours; requested that he be given the same opportunity as those stores across the street; and pointed out that his facility reflects the great pride he takes in his business. Mike Anders, 1313 Sunset Drive, noted that he would support the applicant's, proposal; but addressed his concerns with people coming through his street late at night loitering and littering; and questioned if this sale of alcohol will create more of a nuisance to the neighborhood. Robert Kurstey, 3435 Wilshire Boulevard, attorney representing Nancy Yu, who manages Abe's Liquor which has operated at 240 Pier Avenue for the past 20 years, expressed his client's belief that allowing an expansion of alcohol sales in this area will create a problem. 8 P.C. Minutes 4-16-02 • • Terry Klinger, 1203 Monterey, stated that his residence is located across from Alta Dena Dairy; that his car has been vandalized; expressed his dissatisfaction with the noise, littering and people urinating on his property; and urged the City to not allow further expansion of liquor licenses/sales. Jason LaPointe, 145 Pier Avenue, expressed his support of the applicant's request; stated that this property is well -manicured; stated that the applicant is not responsible for the noise, vandalism, littering and other problems in the area; noted that the applicant should have the same opportunity to run his business as that of his competitors; and urged the Planning Commission's support of this request. Eric Kosella, 1405 Manhattan Avenue, commented on the benefit and convenience of this business which is enjoyed by many residents in the area; stated that the applicant runs a decent, friendly and clean business; and noted his support of the applicant's request. Bill Drewer stated that he has a business across the street from this dairy; expressed his belief that because the applicant is outside running his business operations, it tends to discourage illegal activity — noting that the applicant has reported illegal activities on several occasions; and noted his support of the applicant's proposal because of its benefit to the community. Jim Krinaught, 1706 Manhattan Avenue, 23 -year resident and neighbor, noted that the applicant runs a decent operation; expressed his support of the applicant's request; pointed out that this is one of the few remaining dairies in the South Bay area; stated that he feels safer with the applicant being outside and keeping an eye on what is going on in the area; and he encouraged the Planning Commission to support the applicant's request. There being no further input, Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kersenboom noted his support for fair competition; stated that this facility is a clean facility; and highlighted his support for extending the hours of operation. Commissioner Tucker stated that he would agree to extending the hours to midnight with a 1 - year review period; and in order to mitigate traffic concerns, he suggested that cars only be permitted to turn left to exit this facility. <: Vice -Chairman Pizer noted his support for the applicant's request. Commissioner Hoffman commented on the effectiveness of businesses remaining open late and the reduction in loitering or illegal activity. Chairman Perrotti highlighted the fact that there is no record or registered complaint as a result of this business's operations; and noted his support for a 6 -month review period. Commissioner Tucker reminded the Planning Commission that this business has no record of being open past 10:00 P.M. and, therefore, it is not known what problems may occur. 9 P.C. Minutes 4-16-02 • • Director Blumenfeld, in response to Commissioner Tucker's comment, stated that staff could provide a progress report if the Planning Commission so desires; and advised that if there were a problem, the matter could be set for hearing and the CUP reviewed for modification or revocation. Commissioner Tucker reiterated his concern with traffic, suggesting that the vehicles only be permitted to exit in one direction. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Vice -Chairman Pizer, to APPROVE the applicant's request. The following roll call vote reflected approval of the applicant's request: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer Tucker None None 10. CUP 02-3 -- Conditional Use Permit amendment to allow on -sale general alcohol at 142 Pacific Coast Highway, The Pitcher House. ff Recommended Action: To approve said request. City P . ner Schubach stated that from July 1997 through April 2002, there have only bee - o noise co aints from the music at this establishment and one complaint regardi ► loud individuals r- : •rted to the Police Department; advised that the applicant is reques : to only change the type . :.lcohol that will be served at this establishment. Responding to Chairm. ' errotti, he noted that this building does have ai • nditioning, but that it's not adequate for the si •.. f the building; advised that the windows - not open when there is live entertainment; and pointe sut that one of the conditions for .proval is to require that an adequate air conditioning system installed to enable the bus' ss to close doors and windows during live entertainment activities. Gary Cullen, owner/operator of the Pitche location for the past 52 and a half years; stated past 6 and a half years; and explained that thl fan blowing the cool air into the bar are north side of the building facing the side of the building; and mention to 10:30 P.M. on Thursday nights; and pointed out t noted his interest in b the problem imm experiencing a is r. Culle idents; advised t at live music is played is and from 9:00 P.M. to 1:1 occasionally, there is live entertainm a good neighbor; advised that if something tely; and stated that because he is not able to vised that this business has been at this e has been the owner of this business for the air conditioning unit above the stage with a tated that there are no windows on the - the door is kept closed on the north ee nights a week, from 9:00 P.M. M. on Friday and Saturday on Sundays. Mr. Cullen s wrong, he deals with ixed drinks, he is uction in business. se Commi • ner Kersenboom stated that the applicant should abide by the City's cod ade• : e sized air conditioning unit should be provided. 10 d that an P.C. Minutes 4-16-02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • P.C. RESOLUTION 02-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MINOR AMENDMENT TO CHANGE HOURS OF OPERATIONOF AN EXISTING MARKET WITH OFF - SALE BEER AND WINE FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 10:00 P.M. TO 8:00 A.M. TO 12 MIDNIGHT SUNDAY THROUGH THURSDAY, AND 2:00 A.M. FRIDAY AND SATURDAY FOR 205 PIER AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 49, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH TRACT Section 1. An application was filed by Won Sam & Katsuko Y. Ahn, seeking a minor amendment to an existing conditional use permit to change hours of operation of an existing market with off -sale beer and wine from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. to 8:00 A.M. to 12 midnight Sunday through Thursday, and 2:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit on April 16, 2002, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The business is currently operating under the terms of a Conditional Use Permit, as amended, approved in 1990, for on -sale alcohol (beer/wine) in conjunction with a market with hours of operation from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. daily. 2. The property is zoned C-2, with commercially zoned property to the north and east. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit: 1. The site is zoned C-2, and is suitable for the proposed use with the proposed amendment for extended hours with off -sale alcohol; 2. The proposed use with extended hours is compatible with surrounding commercial uses; 3. The imposition of conditions as required by this resolution will mitigate any negative impacts on nearby residential or commercial properties; 4. The amendment is Categorically Exempt from the requirement for an environmental assessment pursuant to Section 15301 class 1 (involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing) of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves amendments to the Conditional Use Permit, subject to the following Conditions of Approval, which supersede the Conditions contained in P.C. Resolution 90-85: -1- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 lI 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1. The plans shall remain in substantial conformance with plans submitted and approved at the October 16, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. 2. Operating hours shall be limited to between 8:00 A.M. and 12:00 A.M. Sunday through Thursday, and 2:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday. 3. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 4. The business shall provide adequate staffing, management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, littering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business and in nearby public areas. 5. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's Noise Ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments. 6. The exterior of all the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained free of graffiti at all times. 7. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 8. The project and operation of the business shall be reviewed in six months. Any violation of the Conditions of approval and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be grounds for a public hearing for revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. Section 6. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit Amendment shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate -2- to 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedures Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. VOTE: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: Tucker ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 02-19 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular me ting of April 16, 2002. Sam Perrotti, Chairman Date 111 es. -3- Blum d, Secretary Cupr02-4 • • BACKGROUND MATERIAL L MAP 25 26 33 .09 „ n ILO o ,56, m $27 Jim P. M 253_5 ,KSg \4.19 ,4y1 26 ,, M 29.09 29 37 30 0 1909 J il tP1 33 et - 40 s /o csi 1.09 N N 29 .56 00• oo� SA 9 . vaj1 ,4)-1 290 29.09 36 39: 190 38 B 40 900 �' 2909 1'4� 30.01 cn W N 138 34 0 30 26 7 1903 37 v 34 ,610* )-111 678 ate.. 10 33 p3.6 R. 30 30 40 190 87.16 'A./0 1.1 16TH CT S4 7 53 6 .52 5 N `431 '43). 50Q 5 2 40 11-5 I$ 40 IyOD Lai ct 60 40 013 40 40 3g 40 40 L,ly %12 40 14 395 soo 40 30 •15- 30 Is %..vtvu8MINIUM PARCEL MAP CONDOMINIUM PARCEL MAP CONDOMINIUM PARCEL MAP Ada CONDOMINIUM PARCEL MAP 69 II 10 ,331- 133L r., 68 9 30 40 23 /27 3' 8 16 4,0 311 40 67 7 „ 19 6 N Ilya CONDOMINIUM PARCEL, 45-'11 131 20M a /4 4> • 4• 4$' 441 fM. /76 14TH CT. O F 131-14 ST. QI /0224 • „ AVE. CONDOMINIUM PARCEL MAP 40 t>00 .M.212177 r, P. M;.229:82-83 P. M. 245-26 PM -285-3 P:,M. 298- 91-9,a 00 4.41e 10 CONDOMINIUM PARCEL MAP /95 /961 BK ZG 187 705 P. P.M.198-• • • Altadena Dairy Wonsam Ahn, proprietor RECEIVED APR 1 1 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT I would like the community's support in extending my hours of operation to Sunday thru Thursday, 8:00 am to 12:00 am; Friday and Saturday, 8:OOam to 2:00 am, excluding holidays. If you are a member of the Hermosa Beach Community and are in favor of my extended operating hours, please sign this petition to be presented to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission for consideration. Name G► t,DMY` J ~-0 Vkt O1 Ste-V(1n GaI4ni Address 1c - �3 (13(0 (,ovii .* 14.0. 14 F/ims-Ge,1 2D0 P&I4uL 41.3 2O2- ecu- 4-0i.e61-44 nl «o-tMoNf0. Ave Aid -4 Mto-q---/46 ,*,ea//\/ 33V /o -A4,57-: 45en§57.9 /C/o /)/, Arr/77 1 1A,(11 kmvgu �_1 t h/rvc:,z 2 ©o ,fc Sv/76'/ 2. • j aWACPiu+n ZC12.616rwv0U_ $h 1' ti 025‘{ 52-5 3Ved" 2-3-1 I7'snh6 /JJ /u25 7l ‘ i ke . n 1 Nf 3(, t(fl4 lJr # (-1I 1035444c):: `r ,,rr ,►5` 520J�P i✓�2A,, 1�6ie.5EsT.J< ejoz.ly t Ff rn cr 0-444( 10 (3 d k (1:ti (l _ ._ (j h IA 6-4 ?-0(ae_6[ 54, C,,�rr►t 1 s7 q 114 9N b 90_255 Th-ttyKift IlteVefr (LIP' P.C. 1\ 42 q_025 7 (3 • . Altadena Dairy Wonsam Ahn, proprietor RECEIVED APR 1 1 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. I would like the community's support in extending my hours of operation to Sunday thru Thursday, 8:00 am to 12:00 am; Friday and Saturday, 8:OOam to 2:00 am, excluding holidays. If you are a member of the Hermosa Beach Community and are in favor of my extended operating hours, please sign this petition to be presented to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission for consideration. Name Address /'/4r, AOS . 7 ___e_a,kaP_s_r(-L4-1-- vs- 4.4 t) A 192A4A1 1 fl) 1-/r4 rte, c,sc_i_si„( ale i (711-1 ST L IRw,^ -610 Z `-ir. IH B C. 4/001/4A-�C /5-L/Li "lw.i,114/4" J /s6 2 L i-te,- , -1i c', 6.,a G /(3') � .* 3/ e 5 2 24( tout pr. yt I. �it,ef (630 vtea, N f C oC s -r *tote tu-11-1 (1\0.,-1 11\i y- 3 "3 v R1t41 n^Y c %/ k.T f 1' 1g. Signature • • Altadena Dairy Wonsam Ahn,. proprietor I would like the community's support in extending my hours of operation to Sunday thru Thursday, 8:00 am to 12:00 am; Friday and Saturday, 8:00am to 2:00 am, excluding holidays. if you are a member of the Hermosa Beach Community and are in favor of my extended operating hours, please sign this petition to be presented to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission for consideration. ciko2it& ame Address ).31(4, 1-ktkNosA 47 H.1 G a►J W 3)-1 ? o tAve ZG; o Lam- , Ij P) 4 t O P-14hR1Yotati3 Pa. rk-f to.nrter,6 p (3 3 I f kOtAkA t Pkw, !�� AI.a `:. 4. 6cv-5, 6kerzAirsi Rib AtzDinnoce 465 ioz--c-`4 6P -Ce.. _ 1305 ?ALM \-1t 162S4-- .244 icco/ `i“i e._e 4/f) �� '-moi e" SIV /5"39 al(?AvmA8 y,//5 fez 3'-i ,.%rte. y/94. e 7,-.1FitiP7ir zeo segnaircher 1p'i Minh „ Ave . H. P 4)5'1 1 Signature 'OWN YAP Agre Z.A.t4A,4 ray 0 Ray vi Pit_ it -0 \)(,1 rz oL 6,12{. 2.cto 62 s a (bas4v143,0 •b,(-• ?, iS • • Altadena Dairy Wonsam Ahn, proprietor 1 would like the community's support in extending my hours of operation to Sunday thru Thursday, 8:00 am to 12:00 am; Friday and Saturday, 8:OOam to 2:00 am, excluding holidays. If you are a member of the Hermosa Beach Community and are in favor of my extended operating hours, please sign this petition to be presented to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission for consideration. Name Address Gn-1 C W Fait/ (C° Y fl o lVT i e J f Bice 30/0o ti 72"'CS,4 AT H/tW- td -27 ( /t -cEI i A-ePt . f°h ! 1 c& r %0A0 dart - 17.r1145 S cutv awl (Po.hr ttiCAblwas E • ri 1 vea.4 Signature 3 a C !'ice-' /�- ort. t-ufs r0440 -1e4 dye 44 - ace A p 4 � 10c( MilAvkicti-v.v. five, qS Rer /Aie e, .14a ebg PaCiutgin .41r3 ZS'1' s •-//$ . Nan- -halm -. ,Yeo 4 Pxak, /111)5- 4,4,'/97y-4 totple S /o i • • Altadena Dairy Wonsam Ahn, proprietor I would like the community's support in extending my hours of operation to Sunday thru Thursday, 8:00 am to 12:00 am; Friday and Saturday, 8:OOam to 2:00 am, excluding holidays. If you are a member of the Hermosa Beach Community and are in favor of my extended operating hours, please sign this petition to be presented to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission for consideration. Name Address (7'l7 /4-1.4ei epi a / f r1- / 7010 11u w -g e . S-3 I PI Ilk r4U, ?1' v-1-1 mokert / F v d KleVi:ra.viSe 4,‘ un�e�J;S ite, elks c1 {v\tq--uA 411..\ S16.e���.w �c� t cf• L rv` v Loud c r) /e \z2 -Lk 1 �5 ?s h 1 s( - *W -+ ( z 47(4, orlTn- 512 BeCtej U? 1444 5Lv VA PO /14 7:-(j /4-2- 13 e -i z., J %uxN ttn wA M %via t9biOvA►N& "6,co Si nature /1' • • Altadena Dairy Wonsam Ahn, proprietor I would like the community's support in extending my hours of operation to Sunday thru Thursday, 8:00 am to 12:00 am; Friday and Saturday, 8:OOam to 2:00 am, excluding holidays. If you are a member of the Hermosa Beach Community and are in favor of my extended operating hours, please sign this petition to be presented to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission for consideration. Name Address /111W '0( 21:N e H.a 566fTAYA ru59y 153 zoiti A *. Ce,{ -f tiv1Cert— 3° I roar �� - � j ,g :Tedvely )43 , t -7 Avg H, / 4444. C cn..t-5 5 c9.Qve#i ,..)ac^" ctaiwuNr 1,'313 fel*4t4 Peva [IS is okN A wools Nim A-Tt vi -� Yce or .A • • • Off, N t//' // ///P�.-moo -� `na Svl 9t S��f '/ ellarwir" /1 B Ma44,01100194 %e©"c'zr (76,17,,-z /477 riA„L., j71 4 P . //B Signature _4 eritrziArfte .1410. ,/ 11 4IWZ I !% i J1 Ifr-VrAel � v 0 1 4t1y rn I..(7 4 %- 000-k1eP uos,- -44-0 (S26 olc-^t-...� 4kk.'e_ /T )v4L)1 rn9i T . //1'' fl Gr- la- Qm- • irrim /// i • • Altadena Dairy Wonsam Ahn, proprietor I would like the community's support in extending my hours of operation to Sunday thru Thursday, 8:00 am to 12:00 am; Friday and Saturday, 8:00am to 2:00 am, excluding holidays. If you are a member of the Hermosa Beach Community and are in favor of my extended operating hours, please sign this petition to be presented to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission for consideration. Name Address /ed/cr Zi�- 048e ff.//2.66. & ' ineA 2f ' 3 -�l4hg— R_,Gdod 9VY gm- °,g 7/&M v /M- / PGQdK GVL4 ) 1 I N Lf NA-FtJN ��vtS '�'I/13. brig- v,tr (9-6 fvW•Qlt` , 1 G ‘"ta 0o.taa-,-Vcve- e e 11,N k 712- hilj N v -e 14 . it' is" & voIX 141 Na,c-meNil 61_4b_ , 1-1 oloq Et p k [APA Pty + ,AiR 9 oz( Cock( t, 162 Lon Dr ot- c\02S9 571 -L -- K l z -s4 Nek1N4 134% mo4161-Han Are MC N$ 96 72131 (Awk-c-,¢ f- t1711 ivt01,64,q il2WD . b *4 Signature gge-x-Z.4 I3 • • Altadena Dairy Wonsam Ahn, proprietor I would like the community's support in extending my hours of operation to Sunday thru Thursday, 8:00 am to 12:00 am; Friday and Saturday, 8:OOam to 2:00 am, excluding holidays. If you are a member of the Hermosa Beach Community and are in favor of my extended operating hours, please sign this petition to be presented to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission for consideration. Name Address Q, Pdtriii4ATAivtiv 15-kttoka ale. VLI \vS Fer P D . � T-• 4( 440 Itfsi Vi(54k' ftPD ti4t dpa\ f4t4LtcL,. 1Z.P)- 8fyt A/ /a /'v /-48. Li4Ti Pr 14tet z)tarvw P�t2_1an, Awn& 4 rt,ttiw 170 J'7- ' - gel> (0(Ab ( ' dr. 4'' 4-0 (442 13' 47 vt,� elamk h.-�����7 V ,2/I L et. ►� v( 4- 1. �i - �i.�Mfri. aviL gosio I/1/4* 9Vg ?*21- I )46 z 12 35 Mi 4t rraffS Ate, /B 117ot -s-r /Lk a t gA-E-(L 70 • • Altadena Dairy Wonsam Ahn, proprietor I would like the community's support in extending my hours of operation to Sunday thru Thursday, 8:00 am to 12:00 am; Friday and Saturday, 8:00am to 2:00 am, excluding holidays. If you are a member of the Hermosa Beach Community and are in favor of my extended operating hours, please sign this petition to be presented to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission for consideration. Name MICfif - 1i.1lE 'cnt.) 4-1 gi.4ti-µ {.v Qr fill) /7/^ Mick/6y! W! k JAL Address ao 11 I A / v1 Ww L)%1- Hr/2,1/03lt 43c i( is -777 0 ti ,ems 31 0C -.Q t U J 6./ /4:, 0-3 CVO O )3 ll' S keii440s4 dud 6)3 GI's Sr. i o5,4 6c(1. 1 "OS 1 1�!''Lk - " '-t ( g, l A / 1 )o 6 v f -i CA Signature I -Ail- .pit 7 7 NP,c?fi - (Sw '42 MA L)h- 73(e f o 14er-e ('6l v� \cI\RNMo'?. \jtvi2'1 . 4' S�— te _,.��i►.rr, i i1/ LrI _ ! i 011". 1 0. (CI iP.s /1I5 �1 h k;t1 c v,(3(4. 644,, ►� v -t' ` :lA.l 2 `l U S I Ve--',11- 11AP }tir ii -n Q/ ii l% lova rY `-J 117,r''" 1- - r &r,1-, -St V'f`C%-) P-i-IS\r- o(„, INI\ALAN Owe- 1-16„"koso, • S r. t)0 4 21 1 • Altadena Dairy Wonsam Ahn, proprietor 1 would like the community's support in extending my hours of operation to Sunday thru Thursday, 8:00 am to 12:00 am; Friday and Saturday, 8:OOam to 2:00 am, excluding holidays. if you are a member of the Hermosa Beach Community and are in favor of my extended operating hours, please sign this petition to be presented to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission for consideration. Name Address tfa 3 q'�. ? . are6e��+ 1; 7 /' foAe/ /Z/v) /n/9I1li-x) 5a3 -asrti s -T 34- I AA 014.1.6.6e.....• C4(4 Ciev-6 a AV`s , cI 0 vvki, -t- yrs J CA- t 3 (a A,A0IJ Al2) //►vto,2 ). ,74 /ry�« ? 1, Z OA ST .,31 '.Svc v c< NP 21i s- . Signature /3, nZ a?v, x 2,-tA) PIO- —, (c. H.13 3 22 -pa 401 PA -Liv\ Vs/1 ayi'L P1 N sho \ 1!, ca q0 z - r -717 1h174iil , 7 /6 22- • • John & Janet Mullins 1444 Manhattan Ave Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 April 9, 2002 Community Development Department Planning Division City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 CEtiltfED APR ib 209/ COM. °EV,, DEPT. Re: Planning Commission Hearing, CUP minor amendment, Alta Dena Drive-in Dairy To Whom It May Concern: As a Hermosa Beach resident, frequent customer and neighbor of Alta Dena Drive-in Dairy, I wish to express my SUPPORT for a CUP amendment to allow later opening hours for this fine local establishment. My rationale follows, Customer Service: Alta Dena is run by its owners providing an exceptional level of personalized and friendly service to local customers. I am recognized and greeted when I shop there and frequently enjoy a friendly chat with the owner. Other similar stores w �� immediate area are open late but are not as friendly and not as customer focused in my opinion. I personally will no longer shop at one of these stores after very negative experiences with their staff. Competitiveness: Many potential customers for Alta Dena stay late at Hermosa Beach's fine restaurants and bars on the weekends. By having to close early these potential customers buy from other convenience stores. I would be personally inconvenienced if Alta Dena were forced to close as a result of this proposal's failure to pass. Noise: Alta Dena is immediately across the street from Einstein's which is open late and is a quite popular bar. Einstein's customers are in the area late anyway, so I perceive no additional noise generated by later hours for Alta Dena. Neighborhood Safety: The Alta Dena owners are diligent in their application of the ID laws with regard to sale of alcohol and tobacco products. I have witnessed many occasions when possibly underage customers are asked for their ID. I believe the late night presence of a responsible person, such as the Alta Dena owner, would have a positive influence on the security of my neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration of my comments and my support of this amendment. Sincerely, 7 73 Icy1E lI ;S-41-i4-rvs 6 N A o.S/1 ie/G(f/ C. APR ri 3 2002 QOM. DEV. DEPT. E V e /of ri L u'tr- De 7- , ( C e)/ (11 (it" TY- p fvf A, /1/9/ 60/vcc. 4.,/, \ / 5r (N TS I / (��; eiv70), 71tE WJEA/M b �`1Z�/ C/E ( vs G /. b W JV r` 2 M . L-, -Ws Pp r9�P F',/y LAI /74o vN Xr- E W/ r firtmkc; 6 Fid f 'Lo ri rt v .v %T y" o F 71' i S qv 5 y AREA ` -4T- �i S Los ;7'14 E iv( / \E'er Family 5rylcmo`ofo/ki rte/ (.4714 -FIFE 06 NO X 1 o, S 9Ar2S AN!D C o/:p02ATE 4/4 EE/ (AVE/Co/"7E-o) .4r(e(Lis ccA7-3s 94F6-411 W%f� v5 'Off - DA i' 2 y " 4 4.)/9- 7 5 14 -/vi rw 1' ; e, f S � Jg N C�� '� "T S V z c. is T O ^J / y i‘ 714 "'ly pLift b 1-c 4 v i ti /iv w i T71/ Kiwi)C 6 Ai V41 -7/(C4 -7',.J ND G I4 l E - I v✓/E 6 c F'(,0k^1 . 27LE 10"/ 4 O VI/ 'EJ • I+o i e -Tyr 1 v/71,0 /s . r,J y3 •71/ 1 S Q v { Ty .c_ -ye t < < A. � 0^-� /yr/ 'dr?' (_;0-701-0‘)-9 ) S 7--D / . In nk catz w4/ r) y r,2 ,'/61s 1 , ,. ro y7i-f DA 1' 12 f ' (3j e 'To 1y. E T /9 1 6 o r7`' 6./2-0 /5 6 5 PC T 111/-5GeNrLe , �vi5-piEsS. r- NIS y J 14NO / V • • To: Hermosa Beach Community Development/Planning Commission From: KC Irwin & Family: 510 24th Place, Hermosa Beach Subject: Alta Dena Dairy: NE Corner of Pier Ave. & Manhattan Ave. To whom it may concern: April 16, 2002 RECEIVED APR 1 6 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. This short note is to voice our support for the continued operation with extended hours for the Alta Dena Dairy. As 17 year residents & homeowners in Hermosa Beach we have come to know Juan at Alta Dena and appreciate his friendly conversation, service and smile. We consider Juan & Alta Dena as long time & important members of the Hermosa community. When I noticed Alta Dena closed early I first feared something bad had happened to Juan. It can't go without notice that Juan and his family work very hard & long to make a decent living with their Alta Dena Dairy. We would hate for them and Hermosa Beach to lose the Alta Dena Dairy/Juan because of restrictions on his hours of business. The extra hours Juan wants to stay open are significant hours that have helped Alta Dena Dairy be profitable in the past. These are the hours when the downtown area is the busiest and foot traffic past Alta Dena's corner is highest (wether or not Alta Dena Dairy is open). I pass by Alta Dena on my bike frequently on Friday & Saturday nights and can assure you that the crowds (and their noise) are downtown to have fun, not hang out and create problems at/around the Alta Dena Dairy. We support the proposed extended hours for Alta Dena Dairy especially when you go by it at 10:30 PM, it's closed and every other bar, restaurant & liquor store in the area is still open and there are potential customers everywhere. Unless someone is trying to force Juan to close down Alta Dena Dairy so it can have a couple of condos or apartments built in its place, we do not see any reason to unreasonably restrict its hours of operation. We don't imagine how the late night noise & crowds in the area will be any different with or with out extended hours for Alta Dena. Have you ever seen the crowd in front of Ein Stien's on a Friday or Saturday night? We need Juan, his family and Alta Dena to remain a part of our Hermosa Beach Community & hope you grant their request for extended hours. Please support the continued existence of Alta Dena Dairy. Thanks for your consideration of this matter. KC Irwin SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION • • April 15, 2002 Community Development Department Planning Division City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 RECEIVED APR 1 5 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. Re:Conditional Use Permit Minor Amendment to Change Hours for Altadena Drive -In Dairy To Whom It May Concern: First of all, let me begin by saying that I am opposed to this proposed minor amendment for the following reasons: 1) It seems the only purpose for changing the hours of operation is to have the opportunity to sell more alcohol to the people that frequent the bars and restaurants in the immediate area. 2) The immediate area is already oversaturated with places that sell alcohol (Abe's Liquor Store on Monterey, Einstein's on Manhattan Avenue, and the Altadena Drive -In Dairy right across the street from Einstein's. This is not counting the bars on Hermosa Avenue and Pier Plaza. 3) Einstein's which is located directly across the street from AltaDena Drive -In Dairy recently requested an amendment to their hours of operation and how they operate. This would allow them to have a cover charge and only let in people 21 years of age and older into their establishment. I live next to the office building on the comer of Manhattan Avenue & Pier Avenue and I see first hand the drinking that goes on in the parking lot next door. In the mornings I find cans and bottles of beer and alcohol strewn about my property and the parking lot next door. I also see and hear the commotion when the bars let out between 1:00 a.m. and 2:30 a.m. I have had tenants move out because of the noisy conditions every weekend and prospective tenants always ask about the noise in the area. I tell them it is noisy on the weekends but that sometimes is an understatement. I have seen and heard people coming from the bars banging on the news paper racks and making all kinds of noise as they depart the area I have also seen the recent vandalism of a concrete, trash receptacle broken in half laying on the sidewalk. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION • • Re:Conditional Use Permit Minor Amendment to Change Hours for Altadena Drive -In Dairy Page 2 These are the results of people under the influence of alcohol who are left to do what they will. Imagine what will happen if you allow one more place to change their hours of operation so that they can sell more alcohol.Do we really need another place of business to sell alcohol? I think not. I propose that you take into consideration the possibility of the city having more of a police presence in the immediate area (Hermosa Avenue, Manhattan Avenue and Monterey Avenue) from 1:00 a.m. to 2:30 a.m.to ensure that people act in an orderly manner and do not disturb the peace or vandalize the neighborhood as they depart. You have an open invitation to come to my place to see first hand what goes on after the bars let out on the weekends. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Dean Bakolas 1158 - 1160 Manhattan Avenue Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (310) 3794290 aq • • Donna D. Verret RECEIVED 1401 Manhattan Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 MAY 2 2 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. May 18, 2002 Community Development Department, Planning Division CIO City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Review and Reconsideration of the Planning Commission Approval of a Conditional Use Permit Minor Amendment to Change Hours of Operation of an Existing Market with Off -Sale Beer and Wine from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. to 12 midnight Sunday through Thursday, and to 2:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday at 205 Pier Avenue, Alta -Dena Drive-in Dairy Dear Planning Commission Members: Regarding the above matter, I would like to ask you to consider permitting the Alta -Dena market to operate in the requested timeframes. I realize that there are certain restrictions that are needed in order to ensure community safety and wellbeing, but in the case of the Alta -Dena store, there are no issues or problems resulting from the store hours. I live only 1/2 block from the store and it is a tremendous asset to our neighborhood. The owners are extremely conscientious and provide a service that many of us depend on. For those of us who work late hours, the store is a convenient stop. The store provides easy access and a friendly face at the end of a long day. At 11:00 p.m. I do not want to have to stop at a mega -grocery store or at a liquor , store simply to get a coke, a pint of ice-cream or a newspaper. The store does not create any disruption or problem by being open late. To my knowledge, there have been no issues associated with noise or gatherings of people at the local Alta -Dena. To the contrary, the store permits parking off of the street and has only a few customers at a time. The storeowners know this neighborhood and the folks who live here. I have on many occasions gone to the store late in the evening and encountered the owner carrying on a wonderful conversation with a delusional street person. Where else would a homeless person get that type of communication late in the evening? Besties? The Hermosa Saloon? Lastly, the store being open late at night provides a sense of comfort and safety to my family. Living on the corner of 14th Street and Manhattan Avenue is a bit of a challenge at times due to the bar noise, the weekend carousing, drunken brawls and cars speeding up and down the streets. I realize that when we choose to live at the beach, we buy into the lifestyle, but having Juan, the storeowner there at night gives us an added sense of safety. Juan is a watchful vendor who is concerned about the safety of the neighborhood. He is vigilant and keeps an eye out for those of us who live here. I have no doubt that if he saw something unusual around my house at 1:00 a.m. on a Saturday, he would report it in an instant. I believe that is the case for all of us. 2F • • • Page 2 May 18, 2002 In summary, we have little left of small business America. The Alta -Dena store is a true asset to our community and offers that special neighborhood service that is rare nowadays. It is convenient and does not in any way create a problem for the neighborhood by being open later than usual. I cannot imagine why there would be an objection to this wonderful service for the night owls who live here. I would greatly appreciate your consideration of permitting the alternate hours for Alta -Dena. Sincerely, Donna D. Verret Hermosa Beach Resident ,29 /04,vc,66 (4/ cy--7 6 310 3/ 8--/5-c* 238 Pier Ave.. Hermosa Beach -CA On9n4 (111nt 010_ 30 • RECERVEC MAY 22 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT I- A" 5'1)120 il 17 ev,vve 1 eiie \Ael 4‘ t)a VIA- A 1-g_dt, 4_ (12)y ,,,,-vi,......e_ 417,--r ez, twl.ors- /dz. 4 qi,".--4 Y-.2-4--c-sql 14 0 I M 0)5-e... 6t d ril 11' a-5 X ,) "yeiligkele.... 1-- th mot 10.11,111- .1I14?„1y. ko14,1 5 '112 k,._ POrAte-t f -164-11400/k "aI4'-C14 '31 S • J lelE Ac7 - %!T j J/ belfry, AV� 1+601(‘.- Ai/OR-7- /WE &6J 6 y_L A e �otilC i � f-va eoriz UUe5 -pIA,3t Yov C0847471— T56( yV) rs U) t(t 1-w/44oz:A CA. 67Grz zi 3/o 761-45L-6 FtECEIVED MAY 22 21102 COM. DEV DEPT 3v vvo( 4-yvvvilk \AA- 04(Af\-t-, 1A\invVo 0 (k, euv\--(k J via v\;l \;t -e/ \m^^ e ONNZA1\\(\ eli\fr-- wcvWn 1HU D� Wi") �v\i\i\Na Qx,wrly\-1')0 \ "CLEWED MAY 2 2 200? COM. DEV. DEPT 4A7 4/9/14hogatz_ 47— /4'7 ArViVr-Est,ttsv 421/27 (17/4 1-e- 51&/ 2/Z /99/loy /9-4/z) /91-7:0 Dfivi9 32:2" 6 ,e2"/9Ci /2/2,1/116.5- 4-nestc • A/0 vki) 7-22:47Y) T&Ati)/416, RECEIVED MAY 22 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT /11/9-4e //#7 4.194--67.-774 kew /-716/1agq 6'0-1 47ai.c.; 3 77, 4; ekelyz> �QfR.(� (1"k (x- ji, k -b ° [ o -C M �'. b u'�- au r of • Gc �. 'j° `t-' r (UG�' 10tta�a.(�i ofl a ®n sLc��.�-fid IN Ah,e. e�-t�ded d rr ok)fkcoGo( n3 Fr0.4 1 Gt...at d m tau/JIG\ .fkl ir, oA& CICS e..01 task -our f)`1-- +k RECEIVED MAY 2 2 no COM. DEV. DEPT f 310 Mfot.-I "r Bid 651,0_53-16- 9 3� /5 /3 ft he) rtecepvieD COM MAY 2 2 ?no DEv DEP.T. rierieteei„,.11 Ji 7ci— Airt_ fJ 31, • iftEcEN•ED MAY 2 2 2fln? COM. DEV DEPT o; 47cH few e a4,,a, \ // 0 7 G{ ;c L( b ij�,c c5 fry 64,c1 725 inei4kec7 (3/; • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 15, 2002 Regular Meeting of May 28, 2002 SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT (CUP) 02-3 — PITCHER HOUSE 142 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY REQUEST: TO ALLOW ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AT AN EXISTING ON -SALE BEER AND WINE ESTABLISHMENT WITH LIVE ENTERTAINMENT. Recommendation Adopt the attached Resolution sustaining Planning Commission's approval. Background PROJECT INFORMATION: ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: FLOOR AREA: PARKING: MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Commercial SPA 7 Commercial Corridor 2,793 Square Feet 8 Spaces 233 Patrons Categorically Exempt Class 1 Finding On April 16, 2002, the Planning Commission unanimously approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) amendment to allow on -sale general alcohol for the business which has operated for well over thirty years. According to business license records dating back to 1971, during the period of 1971 to 1978 and 1981 to 1985 licenses had been issued for on - sale general alcohol . (Please see attached chronology). The business was originally established prior to the requirements for a conditional use permit and operated as a legal nonconforming use until 1989. In July 1989, the Planning Commission approved a CUP requested by the applicant for beer and wine as required pursuant to Section 17.52.060. According to this Code provision, all existing establishments with alcohol sales, which did not have a CUP were required to obtain one within two years. Notices were sent to all business with on -sale and off -sale alcohol in the City that were established prior to the CUP requirement. In November 1997, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit Amendment for live entertainment. The premises are currently used for billiards, video games, shuffleboard, foosball, table tennis, live entertainment, and dancing in conjunction with on -sale beer and wine sales and some food service. The use is nonconforming to parking, providing 8 spaces located behind the business, whereas 50 spaces are required under current parking requirements. Most parking is provided on Pacific Coast Highway or on 2"d Street. • • Analysis The applicant is requesting an amendment to the current CUP for full service alcohol. The proposed use is appropriate to the commercial zone and consistent with the General Plan The business is considered a restaurant with a full kitchen pursuant to Resolution 97-65 which also permits live entertainment. The proposed interior changes relocate the dance floor and stage to a more central location and maintain the kitchen facilities. The occupant load for the business is unchanged. The interior layout of the business includes a bar with stools, tables, billiard and game area, dance floor, stage, dining room, kitchen, restrooms, and office. Conditions of Approval require that an acoustical study be prepared and that an air handling system be provided so that the doors and windows can remain shut during live entertainment. The applicant has submitted a report on the acoustical conditions during live musical entertainment; however, it was not prepared by an acoustical engineer. The latest Planning Commission CUP approval includes the requirement that a new acoustical study be prepared by an acoustical engineer. According to police records from July 1997 to April 2002, only two loud music complaints have been received in 1998 and one complaint was received regarding loud persons in November 2001. The police department has advised that there appear to be few operating nuisance problems reported for the business. No one spoke in opposition to the requested CUP amendment at the Planning Commission hearing, although two letters in opposition were received for the appeal hearing. (Please see attached). The attached resolution includes standard conditions for on -sale general alcohol and live entertainment including noise attenuation requirements for the business. Given that the use has operated for many years with on -sale beer and wine and general alcohol sales and that there have been few reported problems associated with the current business owner, staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the CUP as amended with special requirements for assessing and mitigating noise impacts related to live entertainment. Sol Blumenfeld Diictor Community D velopment Department Concur: City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Planning Commission Resolution 3. Photographs 4. Location map 5 Business license chronology 6 Correspondence Cup02-3f 1 C.C. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, TO ALLOW ON -SALE OF GENERAL ALCOHOL IN CONJUNCTION WITH LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AT 142 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 44, AND NORTHERLY 50.69 FT. OF LOTS 45 & 46 HOME BUILDERS PLACE TRACT. The City Council does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Gary Cullen, business owner of the Pitcher House located at 142 Pacific Coast Highway, seeking approval of an amended Conditional Use Permit to allow on -sale general alcohol. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the subject application on April 16, 2002, at which time testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. The City Council conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to reconsider the Planning Commission's approval of the CUP Amendment on May 28, 2002, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the City Council. Section 4. Based on the evidence received at the public hearing, the City Council makes the following factual findings: 1. The applicant is proposing to change from beer and wine to an on -sale general alcohol establishment. 2. General alcohol and entertainment with a Conditional Use Permit and the dance floor are permitted uses in the zone the property is located, commercial Specific Plan Area number 7. 3. The proposed relocation of the dance floor and stage complies with all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The project is Categorically Exempt from the requirement for an environmental assessment, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 • 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Sections 15303c, Class 1 project with the finding that the project involves negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby sustains the decision of the Planning Commission and approves the Conditional Use Permit subject to the Conditions stated in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. 02-20. PASSED AND APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 2002 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CUP02-3r CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 ector Blumenfeld, in response to Commissioner Tucker's comment, stated that staff coul provie ..rogress report if the Planning Commission so desires; and advised that if there -re a problem, t - I atter could be set for hearing and the CUP reviewed for me ' ' 'ication or revocation. Commissioner Tucker reiterate permitted to exit in one direction. s concern with traffic, sug_ - - 'ng that the vehicles only be MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seco Vice -Chairman Pizer, to APPROVE the applicant's request. The following roll vote reflecte oval of the applicant's request: AYES: Ho i • . n, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: ucker ABS : None SENT: None 10. CUP 02-3 -- Conditional Use Permit amendment to allow on -sale general alcohol at 142 Pacific Coast Highway, The Pitcher House. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. City Planner Schubach stated that from July 1997 through April 2002, there have only been two noise complaints from the music at this establishment and one complaint regarding loud individuals reported to the Police Department; advised that the applicant is requesting to only change the type of alcohol that will be served at this establishment. Responding to Chairman Perrotti, he noted that this building does have air conditioning, but that it's not adequate for the size of the building; advised that the windows are not open when there is live entertainment; and pointed out that one of the conditions for approval is to require that an adequate air conditioning system be installed to enable the business to close doors and windows during live entertainment activities. Gary Cullen, owner/operator of the Pitcher House, advised that this business has been at this location for the past 52 and a half years; stated that he has been the owner of this business for the past 6 and a half years; and explained that there is an air conditioning unit above the stage with a fan blowing the cool air into the bar area. Mr. Cullen stated that there are no windows on the north side of the building facing the residents; advised that the door is kept closed on the north side of the building; and mentioned that live music is played three nights a week, from 9:00 P.M. to 10:30 P.M. on Thursday nights and from 9:00 P.M. to 1:15 A.M. on Friday and Saturday nights; and pointed out that occasionally, there is live entertainment on Sundays. Mr. Cullen noted his interest in being a good neighbor; advised that if something goes wrong, he deals with the problem immediately; and stated that because he is not able to sell mixed drinks, he is experiencing a reduction in business. Commissioner Kersenboom stated that the applicant should abide by the City's code and that an adequate sized air conditioning unit should be provided. 10 P.C. Minutes 4-16-02 s Mr. Cullen expressed his belief that his facility is adequately cooled, but stated that he would install a larger unit if required. He added that on the weekends, he has at least four doormen and two managers in the bar. Bill Bastion, owner of Patrick Malloys, stated that he supports the applicant's request and noted that he should be afforded the same opportunity to compete with similar businesses in the area. Ian Fortuti, soundman for the bar, stated that the bands are instructed when they need to lower the volume of their music. Pat Irwin, south Hermosa Beach resident, expressed his support of the applicant's request. There being no further input, Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kersenboom stated that the applicant should conform to the conditions of approval and noted that he is in support of the request. Commissioner Tucker pointed out the limited number of complaints and highlighted his support of the applicant's request. Vice -Chairman Pizer noted that while he is opposed to expanding alcohol licensing, in this case there doesn't appear to be a high density of bars in this area as compared with that of lower Pier Avenue; expressed his belief that the applicant is losing potential business because of his limited sales of alcohol; and stated that it is time for this 52 -year old business to change with the times. Commissioner Hoffman noted his concurrence with the Planning Commission's statements. Chairman Perrotti expressed his support for staff to determine whether there is sufficient air conditioning in this building to enable doors and windows to remain closed during periods of live entertainment and noted his support of the request. Commissioner Tucker suggested that the use of other systems be considered, such as a swamp cooler — noting his preference that a cooling system not be limited to an expensive system, but one that is adequate; and expressed his belief that the patrons will drive the comfort zone inside the building. Responding to Commissioner Hoffman's inquiry, Director Blumenfeld stated that Condition No. 5 requires that an adequately sized air conditioning system be installed to enable the owner to keep doors and windows closed during periods of live entertainment; and stated that staff would research an alternate cooling system, if that was the direction of Commission. Commissioner Hoffman noted that it would be in the best financial interest of the applicant to make his facility comfortable for his patrons. Director Blumenfeld suggested that Condition No. 5 be amended to reflect that an air conditioning system or alternate cooling system shall be installed to adequately condition the entire building prior to any entertainment activity being conducted on the premises and to ensure that all doors and windows shall remain closed during entertainment activity. 11 P.C. Minutes 4-16-02 • • MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to APPROVE the applicant's request; and moved to include the amendment to the end of Condition No. 5 to enable doors and windows to remain closed during entertainment. This motion carried as reflected by the following roll call vote: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None ARING(S) 11. R 02-1 (PDF file) -- A nonconforming remodel to remodel/expand 100 squ . e foot a reduce the number of dwelling units from four units to three units a 02 The Stra (continued from February 19 and March 19, 2002 meetings). Staff Recommend Action: To approve said request. City Planner Schubach n. ed that the revised plan reflects a reduction in units and includes a 250-sqare-foot expansion, which the code will one parking space will be ay.'lable for each of the two units. Tucker that the stairway is locate, on the north side in the side y be replaced, it would have to confor with the City's zoning but that it is otherwise permitted to be t -re as it currently stds. nsity from 4 units to 2 rmit; and explained that e noted for Commissioner d; that if the stairway were to de for noncombustible materials, City Planner Schubach explained for Chairma • Perro that there is 100 square feet of countable open space up on the roof, noted for Vice-Chai . Pizer that if this were a new building, the north stairway would not be permitted. Charles Reinagel, applicant, stated that family wi live in this house; stated that with considerable expense, he has improve, he aesthetics of • s property with landscaping and upgraded the real estate; and noted t :t he is working towards ;.etting this property closer into conformance with the City's code f• density along the Strand. Mr. Reinagel noted for Vice - airman Pizer that he is willing to inves ' tate a feasible way of eliminating the north stai : y; and noted the difficulty of relocating the staff . ay due to a lawsuit between he and his neige 'or over a 50 -foot long by 3 -foot wide easement area. Patricia Cochlan, 8 e : The Strand, commented on the legal restrictive easement that • e had sued Mr. Reinagel ov- -- pointing out that she had taken care of the land between the two airways for 22 years; . d she questioned where the proposed 250 square feet will be placed. City Pla • ner Schubach advised that the 250 square feet is up on the top westerly level, towards the fr. t of the building; and stated that the spiral staircase will be located inside the building. 12 P.C. Minutes 4-16-02 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • P.C. RESOLUTION 02-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, TO ALLOW GENERAL ALCOHOL IN CONJUNCTION WITH LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AT 142 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 44, AND NORTHERLY 50.69 FT. OF LOTS 45 & 46 HOME BUILDERS PLACE TRACT. The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Gary Cullen, business owner of the Pitcher House located at 142 Pacific Coast Highway, seeking approval of an amended Conditional Use Permit to allow general alcohol. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the subject application on April 16, 2002, at which time testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The applicant is proposing to change from beer and wine to on -sale general alcohol establishment. 2. General alcohol and entertainment with a Conditional Use Permit and the dance floor are permitted uses in the zone the property is located, commercial Specific Plan Area number 7. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Conditional Use Permit: A. The establishment is already approved for on -sale beer and wine and the applicant is requesting an amendment to have on -sale general alcohol; B. The site is zoned Commercial Specific Plan Area, and is suitable for the proposed use with the proposed amendment; C. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding commercial uses; D. The imposition of conditions as required by this resolution will mitigate any negative impacts on nearby residential or commercial properties; 1 Y 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17` 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • E. The amendment is Categorically Exempt from the requirement for an environmental assessment pursuant to Section 15301 class 1 ("...involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing....") of the California Environmental Quality Act Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the subject Conditional Use Permit, subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans received and reviewed by the Commission at their meeting of April 16, 2002. Any minor modification shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. This Resolution supercedes Resolution P.C. 97- 65. 2. The hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00 A.M. and 2:00 A.M. daily. 3. Entertainment shall be limited to the "entertainment stage" as shown on submitted plans on file. An acoustical study shall be prepared by an acoustical engineer, including proposed sound dampening features to baffle and direct sound away from the entrance/exit and window areas to ensure compliance with the noise ordinance. Said study and sound dampening features shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and shall be implemented in the building. A. The acoustical study shall be based on the worst-case scenario, or on a sound level that will not be exceeded at any given time. B. Management shall be responsible for the music/entertainment volume levels. C. During the performance of any live entertainment, the exterior doors and windows shall remain closed. 5. An air handling system shall be installed of an adequate size to condition the entire building, prior to any entertainment activity being conducted on the premises, to enable doors and windows to remain closed during entertainment. 6. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 7. The business shall prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business, or in the immediate area. 8. The Police Chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may, subject to the review of the Planning Commission, direct the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to eliminate the problem. If the problem persists the Chief then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, which will automatically initiate a review of this Conditional Use Permit by the Commission. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 s 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25° 26 27 28 29 • • 9. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained free of graffiti at all times. 10. The project and the continued operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 11. The hours for live entertainment shall be limited to the hours between 4:00 P.M. to 1:15 A.M. Monday through Friday, and from 9:00 A.M. to 1:15 A.M. on Saturday, Sundays, and Federal and State Holidays, Cinco De Mayo, and St. Patrick's day. 12. Management shall be responsible for the music/entertainment volume levels. 13. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the city's noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments. Section 6 This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid an enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or„annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. 3 /4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. Section 7 The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. Section 8 Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legalchallenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. VOTE: AYES: Pizer, Tucker, Hoffman, Kersenboom, Chmn. Perrotti NOES: none ABSENT: none ABSTAIN: none CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 02- 20 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of April 16, 2002. Sam Perrotti, Chairman Date Cupr02-3 4 // I-] • '42. -••• 0',4•11:A , e Paril*.r 7 r= 60' f 59 1 9 9 i1 FOR PREV. ASSMT. SEE: 4186 - 26 /0 TRS /3 • • BUSINESS LICENSE CHRONOLOGY PITCHER HOUSE, 142 Pacific Coast Highway DATE LICENSE TYPE 1971-1978 1978-1981 1981-1985 1985-1987 1987-1999 1999-2002 B-24 On -sale General Alcohol B-22 Restaurant with Beer and Wine B-24 On -sale General Alcohol B-22 Restaurant with Beer and Wine B -25E Beer and Wine B -25F Beer and Wine with Entertainment • • BACKGROUND MATERIAL May 17, 2002 Community Development Department Planning Division c/o City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 To Whom it May Concern: ReCziveD NAY 2 2 2002 COM. DEV, DEPT I am writing in reference to your public notice regarding the Pitcher House's request for a general liquor license. My issue is not necessarily regarding the liquor license request in particular, but I thought that this would be an opportune time to bring up the noise problem my family, the neighbors and I are experiencing. In my research I have found a clause in the Municipal Code stating that continuous, repeated or sustained noise should not be heard from the property line of residential dwellings from adjacent commercial establishments between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. The Pitcher House has live music most every Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights, and we can plainly hear it from our master bedroom. In speaking to our neighbors, we have found that the noise bothers them as well but they had no idea that they were able to do something about it, hence the fact that there are no formal complaints on file. I am relatively new to the area and I am very excited to be a new member of the Hermosa Beach community. I would very mush like to see this issue resolved, beginning with a chance to be included on your agenda on May 28th. I realize that the Pitcher House has been around for 50+ years, and it is not my wish to inhibit their business in any way or cause ill feelings, but to be proactive in sound- proofing the establishment for the betterment of the neighborhood. I also feel that coming to you first instead of calling the police when this happens would be a less hostile way of dealing with the problem. I hope to resolve this matter in a peaceful and neighborly fashion, and I look forward to attending your hearing on May 28t". Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Pi' r Layton 845 2"d Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 /.- 1 925 Second Street Hermosa Beach, California • MAY 2 2 2002 ^(�M. DEV. DEPT Community Development Department, Planning Division Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 May 20, 2002 Re: Review and Reconsideration of On -Sale General Alcohol Permit at 142 Pacific Coast Highway, The Pitcher House Because I live just a few houses east of The Pitcher House I am all too painfully aware of its presence, especially on weekends. In the evening, the crowds outside its door make it difficult to walk on the sidewalk. One cannot help feeling menaced when she does attempt to pass because the customers are quick to offer comments upon looks, age and, in their minds, general unsuitability to be in the vicinity. One can smell the alcohol fueling the unpleasant laughter that accompanies these remarks. Alcohol also feeds an implicit threat of violence. The only conclusion a reasonable person can draw from this experience is that The Pitcher House is not a safe place. Consequently, my street is not safe. This feeling is reinforced on weekends. Fridays and Saturdays, the crowds get noisy early and stay noisy so that very late at night one can hear loud laughter, yelling and screaming. Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish whether the screaming and yelling are from pleasure or from fear. Because its customers park on my block this noise is often right outside my door. I hope that no windows will be broken, graffiti scrawled on walls and broken bottles left on lawns. This latter hope is often futile. Morning brings bottles, glasses, cigarette butts, napkins—all the accouterments of alcohol drinking. Moreover, although there is only parking on one side of the street, patrons of this establishment solve their parking dilemma by using both sides of the street so that the road is unsafe. It is not unusual to see cars drive the wrong way up the hill on the one- way street. While I cannot prove that these drivers came for The Pitcher House, because alcohol stimulates dangerous impulses it is not an unfair inference. • • All these conditions exist now when The Pitcher House has only a limited alcohol license. One can only cringe at the idea that a general license will be issued. The equation is simple: more alcohol means more problems for Hermosa Beach residents in the immediate area. Additionally, one most answer the question of what the issuance of yet another alcohol permit will mean to Hermosa Beach in general. Hermosa Beach is no longer known for its beautiful beach, its sense of community, the excellence of its schools or its casual style of living. Instead, it is the `Party Town", the "Beach of Bars", the place where members of other communities come to carouse and get drunk. The prime police problems in this city are public drunkenness, DUI, public urination and violation of personal property laws. The solution to this problem is not to add yet another bar to the many we already have. I am well aware that The Pitcher House has been on its corner for many years. However, Hermosa Beach, itself, is changing. So far, the changes look positive and the area is becoming an even more desirable place to live than before. Nothing should be done to destroy this image. Hermosa Beach does not need to be the Beach Bar capital of the South Bay. The Pitcher House should not be issued an on -sale general alcohol permit. Sincerely, Sandra Canter Cc: Michael Keegan City Council Members J 7 • • May 18, 2002 To the Honorable Hermosa Beach City Council: I have been a patron of the Pitcher House since 1995. I like it because it is more of a neighborhood establishment than the bars on Pier Avenue. I believe it is important to support long-established neighborhood businesses such as the Pitcher House, and I do patronize many local businesses. The Pitcher House has been a social and financial asset to Hermosa Beach for over a half century. Although it has always been a beer and wine establishment, a full liquor license is required to insure its financial competitiveness with all of the new bars and restaurants in the area, most of which have the full bar. The Pitcher House has good management and employees. They are very good at defusing situations before they get out of hand For these reasons, I recommend that you provide this old, established neighborhood business with the upgraded license to compete in today's market. Thank you. Respectively, James Lemont 1516 Campana St Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 cetv' May 3:ita coo oEv °"1 FROM : PERFORMANCE ALLOYS PHONE NO. : 3105460459 0 May. 21 2002 03:22AM F1 CREATIVE PERFORMANCE AGENCY Date: May 20, 2002 ATTN: LIQUOR BOARD RE: PITCHER HOUSE Dear SIR, Good afternoon! We would like to offer our support to The Pitcher House in their efforts to obtain a full liquor license. The owner and staff have always been very supportive to our bands and the venue is a great assert to the music community here in the South Bay. A permit for a full liquor license would allow The Pitcher House to offer "the perfect" venue for any band and their fans, also becoming more competitive with the LA market.....added results, bringing more patrons and business to the South Bay. Please feel free to contact me with any questions, comments and suggestions. Best Regards, Cindy Keitz Touring Executive 1212 Highland Avenue Manhattan Bch, CA 90266 310-528-5225 310-546-8459(fax) RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. /9 AII0FROM : PERFORMANCE ALLOYS C PHONE NO. : 3105468459 May. 21 2002 03:22AM P2 Subj: Pitcher House Date: 5121/02 10.29;42 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: CALI info To: Fellx43228 To Whom It May Concern, The band CALI and all of it's members would like to lend It's support to the Pitcher House in it's attempts to secure it's liquor license. We realty enjoy the atmosphere there. They offer a wide variety of games to play such as pool, loos ball, shuffleboard, pinball, and darts. The crowd and staff are always friendly. It is a really fun place for a band to play. The only thing the Pitcher House is lacking is liquor. That is what Is needed to make an almost perfect atmosphere, perfect. I hope the decking people(s) on this matter take into consideration the wishes of the people who patronize this estab&shment. We wish the Pitcher house to hake it's liquor license, Thank You Bass player for CALI and registered voter, Lance Woodruff • RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT 1 • May 18, 2002 To the Honorable Hermosa Beach City Council: I have been a patron of the Pitcher House since 1974. I like it because it is more of a neighborhood establishmem than the bars on Pier Avenue. I believe it is important to supportlong-established neighborhood businesses such as the Pitcher House, and I do patronize many local businesses. The Pitcher House has been a social and financial asset to Hermosa Beach for over a half century. Although it has always been a beer and wine establishment, a full liquor license is required to insure its financial competitiveness with all of the new bars and restaurants in the area, most of which have the full bar. The Pitcher House has good management and employees. They are very good at defusing situations before they get out of hand. For these reasons, I recommend that you provide this old, established neighborhood business with the upgraded license to compete in today's market Thank you. Respectively, Gerald McGowen 1440 Campana St Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 s RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. zl Local Music Scene Magazine&Guide from the South Bay of Los Angeles To the City Council of Hermosa Beach, RECEIVED MAY 2 3 20P2 COM. DEV. DEPT With respect, the expansion of the liquor license to allow the Pitcher House in Hermosa Beach to serve cocktails is a deserved and well earned upgrade for the establishment. As publisher of a local music magazine I have been attending musical events at the Pitcher House in Hermosa Beach for the few of years. What the Pitcher House means to myself and a lot of the readers of my magazine harkens back to the public houses of yesteryear. There is a sense of community at the Pitcher House. And a pronounced sense of local respect. A well known neighbor to the Pitcher House is the Hermosa Saloon. The "Saloon" is a like spirited establishment. In fact many of the patrons that visit this corner of Hermosa Beach consider both locations with high regard. A separating distinctions between these two businesses is in the flavors of libations that are available at one but not the other. Where the Pitcher House purveys beer and wine the Hermosa Saloon has a board of fair that is expansive and includes cocktails. For many seeking an evening of socializing these added choices are attractive. There is a respectable number of patrons who will set out for a night at the Pitcher House, to enjoy the atmosphere, gaming tables and live entertainment, only to find themselves travelling to and fro for a cocktail at the Hermosa Saloon. The Pitcher House is a well run organization. The interior Of the establishment, while appearing chaotic is actually a highly designed and well maintained environment. The main rooms in the bar, with ceilings in excess of 25 feet high, are well ventilated. The musical performances that are presented are monitored and regulated to not exceed acceptable sound levels. This is a nightly concern and by no means assumed to be a fail safe situation. The effort that has gone into the business at the Pitcher House is immense. With an expanded liquor license the effort that will be needed to maintain this high level of professionalism will be commensurate. Knowing the owner and staff at the Pitcher House as I do I know that they are up to this task. Expanding the liquor license to allow for the serving of cocktails at the Pitcher House will serve the local community as well as allow a local business to be competitive in the market place. The Pitcher House is a piece of Hermosa Beach history. David Moore ShadowBand Magazine Many Moore Designs ZZ PETITION • � TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and . civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SI ► ATURE M l 2416 At P UN RF -3 A,', -BILL NIL roil IL -RiPLey lave -- / / �-. ogc� 8a view Dive- • . 115 I4cd 5112 fir 1 evc i- Lk, I/ i.'T'-: 401 Wi2.7i 4"03 Pt c % COC_ D&3/ 2i ei ,- , �� r & i� / I/ --e C( 4,L--.- / 4'00 ha;ki/tatiatA. Rectok it vct 1 ' ^ I .0,/ i -'.' &'abr;e,le i 6v0la doe 7 / o Ave 1 ` 5-/i (�% LDAVfi OX, . /3/ ,'# 4?/3f / 1 I 2,/t orim A D K lot r i� r /5 f AV/r?1 a /_ V All /4 (0,612‘).-) ,Xle ,/;/-L,/ c_---- -mow\-\� CAK \. tireli si\ / /4;e / Wkell / /Li 7 le* -/ OC: 0 Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement WhP.n rmmrtlPYP fhic. fnrrn will M nroconforl fn fho In,,.,, Posh I`ih. I`notnril \AIo ..till rm. "A.4 ..n...m -.nr1 ..d.f............... N.:.. 4...«.... a 2-3 • • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL RFCEiVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIG ATURE 7-zW.9'V7Y/'9 ,- --.ENi'/N.S .Shy z'sPz,9"/,6 . /O3 4,600NDU Bu.9C'//, Ci9 9'0277 / ,%i '//4 AGE x A . 1-tuuvz_ t, c4 3 w 141 sr ;414w• Ace. Ne CA . g'oz-So I / . G. 12-e outAs 640 tVL-- he , / i K-61414437-14 l LC A 2.-3rz-2_ c- eNz_poac- ii ,Z 4-17.-( CA- C! 0-4- t 0 / `1 L. Se-n/wt- G �.?l0 7 ..,2 5/ 4:-''' sem• 1.047, e.4 907x7 ��/.0, 0 r / ��\\11 27 50 Nat. fin, 41 -LA `Cov,�ae C 13-,�'l d'� ev P a. ,,o s o AJ 60 77077, sr. C so,1, c' g1,7 y,— ` 4(kot S ' X33 .rag4-broole- Ave. l a Keu)ooce, CO0? 13 . L0 pet. P -`f a 9 �Giifjr,,rI A 4-1--it-7-#7 Sow Pedro, e . O tab) 14-B D 1% wcank S -c' -A t0 CR -a i obazeduccott. -letarli�bS ` � i C(4 - (16 5 iNtet‘4\ L41.14'Oso rr � - Lp�,v1;r._eke � t. (.14_ 0 J %14 ) riUtryvz Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL E'VED MAY 2 32002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE �� �.1p0 1y. amioo 005 4. 5 tet, c,oa q/Q-,7, ,/,',' �� a,„ RPh Lei �i d f � � g`pz.�y /21 �i //.�6 // .: . L.i.v. o ev-i- W ((o at A.,, pc,,,e. St ' • N0,1\ci( 14 CG ^" .117- 4�a , 11 ---w"'/,� �l4 /1 teaca•e/ /`/1"/ '7r�r") TV--- e#,/, (',1124'S 2-6 fit (If. io I .6.4/4 1 L')L7 4 �- — ;�! 3 ' i\pat (666 04Ur,'o ir Ai __f -- I i r,r. ..?_20-1-..„.. -6"%3.90 �fy CI -al( ,I415tA GYICALO 1.1 %, GOMA/ dtA, W 6 ' . ; a R. 0 fr/Qs �c i �(/l w /v 2�Pid"11 ie Matt Zilll �2(q)q- yA,/ 10'6 ?Pict- ;(/-,- (/-' - j 6A -6\c_ t-3tL-i I_ornm 00 ft 9 • pe-'1'7, 40, ,r."11 we g(.11 (c. / if \ 1 \ c c rag -1W66ts,,, ‘lo &IAS V\-eF-“ -ick �e 6 ii'• 4 / _ •tom/ ir IN ,4L1 c (a.Gtt 4 5� ,-t/L4-y1�CSti l 1 f4kis1.rS ZC /1A-"-1 ;A) S'61-( 1-( '>*+- 1.',/ /N/c-74\ Af---t,---- (")t-� 'u-- L LI 1 iL( ti,, v) v, e1/4/-1 )-Iv'-1My'5t // i' Y ,----4 v'`^e, •A— 2 S 1 o At, -c,4-,•.s-k-• +PL .-g R _ ( _ /t., L_ - ______2_______ Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement When complete, this form will be presented to the Hermosa Beach City Council. We will not add names and addresses on this form to x<y 1 PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL IlikegiVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME dfins ADDRESS SIGNATURE C N (Z LS Vget [(-1 e1- (9.A,4l (L )L ( v 02.-wc. t� (toi.r- , l "7 ---tet. .'&d ...F r`f I k- lei 2 vlz.ci /-14(2eC-40 pi/ISL( f 2 ,0f;94,ec% ciC. L r:_t_CD(_)e-- 2_0 Na G) rt 14--L--c)-./...e— pick_ Lc -,,,,,Er( 2 c( 3 (w 5e-di.,0 719/44-1 64(1 7 rH s.......,c....„..._ A6 Z _ Jr- S4' _v 0 Lir A+ • 151 i L r, # b ► I Of ct s�4,4ro k 323 Sibr.A4t.;rr� ,747 (�AC,goz77 Y ' �% -" � ri-reJ4 ,: , S4 A ,/S lir Q /o 3f 7 S gs .�, �r.1, I /A' _ Q Valtt J ININ- i iti.":)/Lii-i'di .4._, // filfiRr&II • - 721 L( 36 `7 1 3 , i1- S #11!,4401'lltb '), Cv1 l.(Cov- P WIf�\ V 4 61� �`— �32D 1, 54. re 1/14 " ' _ ;..'45 1 ease send completed petition f to The Pitcher House, 14 CH, Cosa Beac Privacy statement When complete. this form will be precnnt d tn the I.l ,mn¢rtf./ t'.,...,ai we ..♦u . ,. .. • PETITION TION /AVCr 111) 14.e "CEIVEID MAY 2 3 2002 TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS IiiiTU ' E bd ' aa (/ t 9 5? FS %'''' lettifieliD gq 0 ick PiC a a r La :IQ vi'I m 1A) ei.he-r 53 � /I 61, /-/� ;,4'- t -w -t 2 IA-- aG _ , iva,LScrv7' 2-9'51.Eyid He ._ E - c (V THE Sr4ivd lig 6-74,„, g;,,,i, //,77 /„4 /,,, ie I/6 e,7_41.,” ZIOC- 5?i r _ vf'Z/ Vfr I p z i tsg ' 6MvVcZIiy(oI �•�' /7 i -. H -I 3 goS.1- . rnp,,,, ,A")_ M fiyio , r. 1,000/44 T IA, k /l7 3g ;11,7).0 Alt //® 9e Lt1\ Vie r0,4dSi ' i :-(;-\ g -7 1 vla( si, c , 0 -at) )tri^ 0 1 5fi -I ► � �• ,. r4 . It.l1-E3.)1e.1Pr,.:S . P°'YvkQ)(5'c, kite -7 a Eft -6- '�-�-ik.„--,N66 Ak/ .i-_____--� ,E24.2_ /li %-cA %/ / -io Yid. 42/ --__--: /, _ — __:;• -2 435' .�" Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 Phi;1(ermosa Beach Privacy statement When complete, this form will be presented to the Hermosa Beach City Council. We will not add names and addresses on this form to L) PETITION • • Live j w Nom, MAY 2 3 2002 TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neigwooIr n�EV. DEPT communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS , SIGNATU E _/_c'=__C1i�An\ I—I Ij N�r�s r� �o 8 � A . \1A . "%!L 0 0D 0 / 100D 0 /j/Gt'C‘\/ //r/ado- a T tom, clro /// ,� - ., 1, MAr/w/ /uoo, 9/5 r1 e sr yg NJ 410 /0-049 i t N-er lef5/v i-i AP ;Av., & Vc, .1.6„.., MAN tutitpid itrj .,,(.64- 1 i' eliav WC (1 70 PfaMatAtie c ' ;. , .... ,\()'�-- 3C r Ste- Hg. .II. il yptii -5f03 pck 6 ua5- ,--, .f 5i- . 2 6e. IA ifrlitt40 — !Jw"i %►-4-,y)c--ii c .. S-6 .i1A & . . J ' ..0.'<.* ja --) ti O s • ,x(4-WOly L....___ Ag r Ci6 /(- Zel c(' r 7 10 q,rd 04 0-60,- _ :, I.e-- ha C .1,,, --Aegar tiaLia ) 0 / 1 s1--, ,`3 qIC r(fitotlpo kr Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement When rmmrtlnfa thic fnrm will he !`i•.. n_......a .•• ...0 _�• _�� ----- -_ _ 2' • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL OtECEOVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department; and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NE ADDRESS SIGNATURE � al . I l l(7ij / c --d /!'"- 6C0-- • -A-t-k . -J.' s ? 15 v SII "'AA* Ti r'1. NITt &)1,-1-1.-- 4 t''�/ &cw E/ ff5 /‘45. //7n' ‘ 4 /jv eciz4nA �� 621 11,1 s' 42,1 ,, �,, N),, / d,sse:A 101 `Leve l��(/�( f/l j m LvJ ! bb • Lt a : rcl �' •!il /LiiLt tb liGt-'76 r 1 -2 -1) -Lb '41t. ' :I' 0.1i Pjlir 1 ea OC.0 Nt*It_c -1:',-.5?'4 4.1,t.k. t.,e, \o, /A PAUL -Low- 9-05 "r -of -CAO . 9a,..C-- Tnl jF.i2-{2 4/I) MOM; (/5%tic, -tel' /W Li5P (L sE /lei k._(,41) � D k 8. 5.0L r el"- 6Akgx,tfyi/swt, R51--tutcv-A tib f)-7 1 , �,�-r Nnb dr ►�-t-r ,, �3c.,c. e�l F (� r y Usz I 'W 0,),\;(X-- Oa --t-- 180S )11,(z,,,:Vst, . tA/k6 IZ T r /4/;7/3--tc/ 4r i .L A-ellOeN r aiM S �.f( Oin ES.(\goit af.WA-v 1 Pleas nd completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH,1imosa Bea Privacy statement U/han rmmniPto this f,,.,, s.rill ha nraeantai to the Hermcca Reach City Council. We will not add names and addresses on this form to I PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL S RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE <-- id i «1. — 414—s •N'' a o STN si 1 go, 0_0, Tui./ i 0 i 1 i;, 1--/(2./ (.2L)Cili.- 5i; -17-3rmiC4 clos-o- „/Q. E, a 37r'l2 ?ten 141ii61,oi01-� -‘ - -i, ,• Vc� c(oKi� \ \ \ \ \\ N . ,..,,' ,,L... /Or .•. —4../ 0 1 _!.f L.A... /, . // '46,1 222 ►- gee s Pivei ' /0 , .44 „. 49.)(-L, 4 (11 e jtil '\' aCe ' y'in€,t alanoe • %tv, .17Y/LO ., t.M\lk. O \ r/ ; licik OtaL -ACJ 'IS I.A\K. TJ Ac%(_i3Oi, o 4061 k.D914.11%)S .k.I - 1, cle- ./foci el 4 le+a ' \ si_ . :M ft r-, f of fin p 1 Q J o'A V' o 4 tv 0-fli e P4' °+ "if ' , Cr? -.e0A,AQ) P 471 f _--Zvr w,Sro2 0.J \o-tZ rim Lt r A,1 t l: ft\bil''''111 \V -V 0,C,\5 V561 Tte‘ S 4 - 4*t 0-0" &- 1 Vk\V/17 v`��t It'd 7 - Please send coripleted petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa BBach Privacy statement 3i • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL 111 RECEIVgD MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE _SoHN (4ft(cT146 159 1.0-l4. y.e 77 e xi 4% - AL( c jA KoLA 5 2.5-- I S at. - f4.4 OA-�� e CIA/ - , — X JA- .,,2 5` zi P.c.u. /1.fl r'<--r_c).1_ �,) r -C/ti % P/� ��Srn ,)- iti i yl � s /i/�G� /17/ �QQc keS ]� ( `��`1 /S-1 S- J ti�+� ca %�� IGO//�� ;0_- S ` �_\01j JCC ,c-,� \ Q 9 51- 15* 54 i-1 \_) c S) I y$ (J--14 Mc.4. '/ _ • 1 i vSN TOtel1Lr&o rrifir i'. LIT 6-1 _ 6,- rolesT (ci2k,/ 17,44 sti. 6" Pte, 4 I L L C I, JI Q i 0 f :6'; - 1:, :zl. C i SAiztic,1 '')/\,E_kY ;----- 6 /'l e ,1 I / -0 %� �t,o�l'�,c'+�]k�h J l / /� , b 7�-� !��a�1 rl G �C��? /���t // y �����r p X/e,t'ffq- QAP0 19,-IsU \ek Pc4 \./At)e f\' C) C11-150 1( )c ( 0:-L 4 I^ 1 c.,r \ r `k zJ 1-1 b (1 L / 5 l 1 n 16 5d- \--i-?) / A-. (Ii beAcum-o1 11c) \C,AA 4} _ (2.0442-----__ 0 _ Please sen completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCI-'ermosa Bbach Privacy statement When complete. this form will be presented to the Hermosa Reach City Council. We will not add names and addresses nn this form to PETITIONRECERVED • MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners -and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the H osa Beach Planning. Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. ft3. TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL NAME ADDRESSSIGNATURE c= IV T M C /?6-2X-ArA) 5V/ 3 /' rC1�-e T/&Rt'la 6)4 (3efIrC (1 S AS&1 JAN•, 0-6' S`i1 3r 54-. 1-1 eivwb s gtticin �� -Tina �r o OS i- 1 til ti-iN Her %��‘ *Fl -i., Aye • + C.14 40?SSS c1� ) I Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement When complete. this form willbeixesented to the Hermosa Beach City Council. We will not add names and addresses on this form to • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL • deaf MAY 2 3 2002 COM. if -7v. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS ' • TURF Nap o. S5-2-C©e -e i ,4,/jet.� / il /?c,_c' ke4 (''f- (L /7 or - -Ce �i Cti e i _ 42 x.5 R/QeViikw q < <a 7 Y\ r.-- --i,ff- ow_a--61Ns otticc Pckt 1A€2,,t4ovv? (gym '(\11(\ r\ ; 1 YU S gtisce.c\- �� SOA .fli /41/C4 iC./Lj?t :Al :372) SI C'5 CtI—/,3/ fit CLUJke �V./_ 3t, C' f/X k "51% 64 • , (11o►rk 60,t),,Aer /120 WI' srt, 1-ke,rot614 112 eacI\ O ,,,,,L:d I/) /E-iM s, . /t.' �Pc �� S, ,ii,((, ,,4()/ (A,,..(,,,,k!,,-. r\ ) \ pi-( L . "� V I , r S « I't 0i,? -1_,‘, L:'1,1-671:',1 i ;, /i (. •l �.r; y (;���. 1_�. sr rte; -r/ � ,y .,�� ; Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement When complete. this form will be presented to the Hermosa Beach City Council. We will not arid names and act - fresco* Olio fest. fn 33 PETITION • Li • TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL iiRCEMED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SI ATURE /-os.o•4e. , c....k_ \7.* \,V" 1-facki at i, tc, tri ye_ L.w ��.iye,., '%L Tlt S;i%s,�,a If , ;3- ,;'•.- ; Nr ,v t .„------_ % Z TLitf 5784,-,, -F' 3 22-t...--_-_::........_ 140,0 i g c ky, c/i ?Li. ri — kH-7 rt ernioc, (IN coaS L. 3"i �-, Hal) � s l 1 6 a -1 (,r-o.ol )4_,-,,_,,,,g. -1 , cif . ,cam y .� N r 1. J ?i • Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement When complete, this form will be presented to the Hermosa Beach City Council. We will not add names and addresses on this form to • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL RFerzilvED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SI ATURE _� N,M 01 g - r%43 --1-1--e S-re-A.-rsl� (D, O1 '--N 4, 4 t -c hri- �5A.C�� , tciLL tc ( �a L Vi Mk- St vavket ,V,,„,,,l '„A -,!+ „A ... Ulr>1� J,,i L.„1.. sJ e. N f - , ...._ ,7 k Q /"1 `” °"' i Z 7 -1 -its S '24' 1=1' S Pk! PA tJA 4( (12. 7cs1 r7 2 IAn ('-'Ot77-7-�' ec'mns�. f3eQ,l,,y A `iDaS't ll% �`� .3-i �-, Hal) °%1 (r.p1 & -i1,,e S� g.,,,,o -6,c, c ivy /.....___ , -,Cs`=�rawi tell\'rl\ �.........e-.---- v. ,` J 4 Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement When cmmntete this form will he nracontP.i to the NPtr„nea Roarh Cifv Rnttnrif rface. sac ..,. 4... • • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE i____ -,.,f f(Ua (�4 C1�t /--, �� / , (! SPO ,c , 5-1,2„_, Lam-,) c , , AJ : �0 -(C �-�: i�r p,., 7r Q1bG1Q B� Y o !-77 c \ / e► t z V20 0.)GfeV N du \ 0,, yylp . � ►,., i. 4,_ z«.. Niau :, e, ,(4-.P, ,,ie. q 7� QIex sans , 2(10 s . 3 ioc,✓,i f OB 0.2.wi' ---r6,;,„0L,-R,„ 1413/ &6 s . J� + - «7 r-l- / SCOTT & c. 4 3l6 2 i t {c Clot- UlL lez ' . ..:ri/ _._,_41 c 6e A -;k.-) Tb vCa.).c C r� Ca 90e, ; .iia.,. cosetr fi4QrcQ zczg- to, 253"1 -ST LoMrrA 907( fr W,//1 A ►')l ( r1% Biu 07 /3051. / S U/5 . %Dg /0.5 f� (11. /G- /,) N/92 6, , 5107yp /Uva elee7,Z/c /9G'l-.569Z/3L`9ly 2 �. VA(4 TRUJii-LO 05) SPKEcKLfS L.A►4c oA i—il (G` (-tAtkt ; 2-767kJe1:1)0 qve-,) ttL( 1(2-',,e0):7,-/, V() iLiilin 4C,7W-sr,! 1,51V .Tz 51, Unit -A 90 :Z77 clsw\ of\ s‘S 72 l(c: l441\N* .tki\ 11. 11' '(-Ye--51`(--<ae7�G7(6.:Jl (7d C (nc. , c,}_cos-FA R.1 d77 1 . sr--- :__ 4: r i - AlLt Ca I --;26P1 I 0 4,' 4 /TLI-c---Kx720A,„7 ce)--1- '(_—, /1 2.__q it 1 4 4W) ' $ f • Mt.t%\/(-- k) e Pl�, end completed petition Forms to The'Pitcher House, 142 P Privacy statement 36 • PETITION O uTs i o TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 5e4/1 14/7/ti //0 Il 644 -al i KA / 1 4k DeI CE -4- 24o. .CS/t; ALOD keeemcto �. 4 'kC :OA Z.C) aI141- 11- 5 1 I ie ili ? TN ' 5 54. 2 t/ , :- ,, , � .' , l )MV Pei/7e_ ///s/C4A.Yy, Blvd - j3.// i-71-47,,,,, `�.,rk1l�/1 c4ki ud-4- A - 4-c_.S‘ ti 1 v -._ i 4,. ii.),ts,,04. NO -1/C34 N5 4u,iod tt(cq Q6 L . 1 9 - ./" �. o :._ _• .„ a : _ C ..,. ... S . fcuvka lam( lean 40400- /4.1. 41r/i.• ��. L � l,eR 0 , _sou ,J171,05-tbr, A0c k3 5oo i '7 , ... I 6Odiii z .27739Arait.-407,;`r. r. 6A(1 -`f dVIFMIJ _gq(3MI 4KLLLo(2- P o-. i444_/. �1 t\1 CONIai ( �I albRAnc1%vA,,� As6,,D4),;_etAnN- ` .,/. it Vpi0 ' Ceiti �4Jl i `tet Ply e 0; —7 ti f • �•, 5+_. u o q.7. --in( '7s Jt4 (drat' r► fr TAMiAcr Bio., • .1.k—A11471 /<hN &,V/J\( 69Aj, -A/f�,���M f /4? - u.. -L --ic 5ge/ I _---60 VII- 1)&1_ /-roN-76-( ,"tom., Gitt%ov, . , 1# ' ci-e Je �v a 61 q E( a. a 6 c.. 5OL )i/ 41i/ -r;44),‘ au Of- e SA v.,) %,,e,Akt ow - .' 9 - " ' ' ./A ) Please Send completed petition forms to. The Pitcher Huse, 142 PGI ermosa Privacy statement 1AR.en ni.mnlnsn .1. i.. 5...... .... ...... 1 "_.._ _.. u._ .._n _ _. _ _ ___ _ • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL • RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE /141qAMPal 1-Agatee,4 4) R6 if d Ka 4c rte - Cr 1,CA //)"N Ni-e 1^,�„0�G :� 0-96q N ,C 1$it.s,\, /ee fro, `ate I l A1 A- 33 3 ct /4 kAl AL1 KC,. T?M fi9 Fc . �-� / �► / / . ins er 3 33g iictild R.d L ff/t at‘'frl,e' - 2Loi Co 1y l aTTH-s bv-e - �� WO ...elt .. i•, utoti, aire. _t2410Atwok-kric- 001-ov- 4 r W7#o 0 ' 17226 0a, i, ,(i�1�.�, 3c 4/e4 ,4 c (0/ qw dbi.re 5 -.1<R —a-ro - 27 'fffi)W! C� �AkiJ v24 -In o � la 11 . C� 1�J4zl1,,,, L..,..„...., 2 1-i6 z 36 sr i d i -o 4 ,i0:19,4 Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement 3c PETITION • TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL • RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE S' '01 -e -e? agAst-C--q? -mak , ( 624 . PA-c-tRe..., ile ..-:16p--- � e.w 4/y-wdOtA4 %/-r,.,.<< / _,. Le w T?2 /Qom 11,-,6,1A._ _AvE 14 c.,12-svtv„,„.,), (weEaS 4hq'''1 IN S. C ,I� (\et Ave. . CA ' •-#'..\ fJ /Ie,L 3`/2 6sea De l„17l�` ,r�4-7.6-1-, _ 1-All 1-1AU-1_, L v,�C.j Vetesil4 f4-olite":“.;L'ci.kL. 9Z ba ; 3) 1f, 23 2 7 /'-e i.17 D/L-/� L-O,'4f' Gi4 7o 7/ 7 1 �i m<a ' --16-4,\oulocK) .P rptAtio-vAA46. OW qcq-DC 40 �r ' ! 0- 1 ''. 'fioFratnc'e CA- Sic, `� `_ _:► ��ishi, 7 am 06.411- n /tri l J1� c5en J ,tris i4n��Jer, !�9 °looZj JI3� /�2os5e2 .4��. ##'1�Z _ReitA mow,— lk Piefi_i43 431v0. ( S-�� t C.�Q fog V�, 1- •� ',;,. FP" (Or/ % /d,11 M 4f3i/btfs 0 A W ORO rAreiMPOPO/249 it.).. 3l. w6t2pdbA iiz3b L 9 c,.(A'‘e.\ Z AEA j 3\p Q -&i iD ' ' „ • l I I dor_ -40401 43- MIA- d--�p ' 7--PAI /ariP �L;/ Osio nb if r c7 cf vi k/ Cr �`(� c ;•+ ova W>a � / 2187 Gi4e. /-G,4- � L /,J/ t Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beac Privacy statement When complete, this form will be presented to the Hermosa Beach City Council. We will not add names and addresses on this form to any database or mailina list. nor disclose them to any other Dartyunless reauired by law. • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIIVU§ decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher Houle,one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SI NA URE `r ( 14 Mt k,r€ ktbl [, (Moo si -t-( F. US7 zs'/ 621)4/ - i .p«- e/-- it ' 1 r l -Wit'( ( Citi e-KrZi f\.o/LM (z tc 14 1f9 g d -f ` s7 ---e At. a3, 17tL / eriTi4- I � tAI2zo +J , a gL o `z B n9A,N/4 Ts14/ 4c -i „ a , 6 (LI ii n) )l E q q 6 -by 't19 AL PEL 6 CtI_ /h- A/6- ., ALLow Avet&k-s m,--- as L.4 I/ I, 4 Sr' �\ f23 y \ ; 3sAka,\Awc,,t-- ,) ctGZ77 Lip S • zn.QQ ..ta,y.g- Lt ' C- . ../ Pad el 11 OUrili ADM/ 9 etath q:81)3 "1 / it , __IN6N fn ` jdP02-cye S? 1 3:Te e ceczt 6'-.e.nZ ce?' 4 dit4JA. 1V % C4s fol 3 E L-1 5, CL Sc� J , 9,2_,,c • ` . A 4 _ ;.t 1 akv:db'°' 67 R44" d q C✓ l -r L5 .L!a IA, 6.1y i S f „Li, u 4 v_t i 'GA 94we / 7 ----a7r G eftw,li (1241c 163=-44 /-4 A/440401 U\' i,poiNJO OINK u\ c.A 4t6rA3 . 4 -,QJ n -d-c)-() \ \4- 1 94,08 . i. (cacir\ act_93„( -ics),Q uccyt1000-3 Ckurf6. 6Guerwv Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hosa Beach Privacy statement When complete, this form will be presented to the Hermosa Beach City Council. We will not add names and addresses on this form to • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL ORECEiVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, busine-ss owrierl taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the -Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE CA7e----FIB. -011, d -A, ,, - "to. . r`t IIGCOWL _i ai_ � i 1-)(3N ),.9' rn !(�LTj � Nos_gy-1-,61.s_ca Nv4 C6 .- , S74v,t__ ,,tic.„1.,,— /6 0 s--- c_c,v,c c.../2-d�. /(.(V/6 o. h -4 % ia. 01/71/11)04/4/u if t 'ltwt '` S� �1-firc iie- _rn&tggai 400 vs- cwt trv/I dvr- c-- _ iii aW� �aA L�..et� (,Sel tc�t `13 Lora. V1,0-�- b i! _,,45'7414111. t li% Dec Ica IS" CVCo,, i'1 e Give 6arctoa fa, 6 gye-A.- Pi tirc_lt gIq ,.Y6 1,14, d. 4 1► • 1T°.V ICI .let. 64.1/b'° f . z �wiegs. '� 1 S ',fir 6,60., _G�. Q S 4,-; /yd y Sc- 77 /rd ----/ — l Q. `,-7 ` ....4 ---fir ./—P / /1/a,G----- 195-4L \kl,;(*c (A 60e-/ 5---f-----e5< Cf-uil B14 41,� a I0b C � 44 l-ii,loZ�P,/3.C4.. -. - �.�: edira. 11 / E tA'r --^e • ,, 4 ?AI A-0,.-11‘-. Gil - tt. 12.. ,3 . P'j V4 u.,„ iaG4 N' /?v C- fit 41*-01Ailaa licr0,10? erahlti(01, rtgir U h Please send completed petition forms to The Pit r House, 142 PCH,'rmosa Beach Privacy statement ...._ _ ______._'� ._ _ ... ___ ___ n___.. n:....._..__oI ...""neve nn.1 a.1.bncene nn 4hie fnrm to • • • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME Please ADDRESS SIGNATURE b ow- cvizzeik Yr( S^ ° /6.2A, 5 441ae attP kc;S_4 /09 5. #e/Aeeilo GHQ hicvdo 7 �l ok(��� n�. 6( 3geo I A �,I",,oJ g(#f t's, x� f c S intia- V%0o4za q1K 14. exos(2 /hoc if--6e--A-91)0s- '7 >s 0,0tAkc t Al eeu q 11 Nl, 2 ±fve• 264 oz7 (40-7/6--- 4/... / l /(d (it t*r e d• 1 .1._. )L /' 1 (OB n( • 14t(hOs( 5 c Sri $01 S- 1.oce,c,n2_4* 30(fl) LIA- CtA? - A '7"— -E-1-3C__ k,(0,,/‘ -2r1Vtnole/"2-,e_ ) aaa > (CAM& 6r L4, C4 50007 Y.1,..... �L &4J e. - 116 4,1Jit& �eytr. L,1, k6. C4 94278 All 12 A ��Af at. 6C�Oui1 11617, 40 A 4jcb?v 40 y / " r 3 410 nt ,4019, f'1"-1._=-____ w, 302 L( C4-4 : ° 7 z. /,'„/-4, A1 ►lh 'met 01 5‘40•44.7.v 44$G 10515- vioc05, - (A f07,31/ S 0,1k6,4 ----,,,„,,,,at_ 41 _5kr,1 69 u. itke,v,v, \ \ I if\11, Mwkj KMak m °1 v i f\ um Ajak rm,do?k k' Z---- 9.Lo( LS 3 v. E VIS �Z � �� �v �� send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement \Ab.nn rmmrilnfo 8,ic f ,..,, ,..:u I.e ..rucenlnrl fn fit. tJs........... n.,.,..1. /�N.. lir.... w:1 I��.... a1 ....4 wJJ .........., w�J .JJ...... u.:. i......... • PETETION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of theHermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. r NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE WMA Scfa4,5 ZS s. (iratwoviLP r^ A vbr2. p_ti. V3ir-,L04,v -! ( s 2-> (2Z S. . 4,-( otTly6 ----ov---__, OK4 WooDLOf l21) ,7//51,/tic-F- /92 enc mcuo_,rrc -t, 2g.2y leerrkhaq el;t7//e/e14 frnciieo Cov)erc no 90/ kNog HI II At ill? ?a O P90' _ —`4? ('1/,'(G 4ipl. hs -I q 3.2- /,V ±6 M4 &vl 40271 gQ.-k 146 eic,z.s 6t,1_ S. Ca-,%(--cut<cc'..,- ,_,A. - ,-- Pc►'r sczo : . • ► al D,y l CO 1 SD Pia csZ ,, ,:.Am. , .�.l�_ P.1 / -, .._ , �c `,A -t070,3 c , Ji,,,,„, -b-;,.% 1 _, D._ ...AL 2/G /IFI S ?�' ,,,w...- :. ..„*. fild1 �Ir, ..p -F-- cA,m--- --?-K--- c___tc-z---- X40 M \fy 20` (3IUWni•.,fl� k� eicir,12(Am-2 _tS(111- qoe fib -7.-.11Aliarivad lin-Zaio "agur ' i' lar-:-.:th -1:10 -1-/ tfilt? DWfSAJc �� 4&:10 Ow -10 d'i ' i Ai , E j r pd Al A -- 41 `: _ ' 24. /�� Mrood /al Vi ease smpleted petition forms to The Pitcher House, 14 CH, I ermosa B, Privacy statement When rmmnlafa fhic inr.....Au I., ..rnen.hn.i f.. H... u....._--- ^--.w na.. .._ ..:os --' .t,_ . r �3 • PETITION • RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 0 TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL COM. DEV. DEPT. We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGN • RE t -i-\ L\wcolp, (oa(ri K\ Almk6 Ar-, 6e„ - Auer NW -;ice.. 1 of Nc.) \.v cv ...,0-er- 16-Er20-0-tH64- N-((. .6 ik5ek 7iUt- If ►C�(w D2a)\R_t 1 A0 W . (04 L t56Ps (SD11 LI L (1 C(QS r . Ii /.---_ -rvIIC 4AEE ek-4ZTL LIS --11 I00cAo sT 4r 9,1u -De vii-&. V 13' TUB/`/ -V✓/moi •.l_' 1 , ' cf v -e ek(k c(S 31 I -t— 3* N. X \ ��h f4, ca-1,helf,vn KRIS e01-1---045 Yt C+-- j i I< ,1- cg S I 3 -"51- Per440.13 R-tc23e-e,c- cif\ pil IA. 1----7ek, ct tvP ir ki,33 z$�'`154 - :-c 1 AIP reAr /, (fel. ��� 3 R2P f PACiS AnZ 131 c. $ 4 9 • show i u/ 40, , `W. Q, , u)\--.( 44-\00, A, 6' '‘)0.4:( 4 , , f36( -C I C(.0 (., e (44-5. Si?. Q.C. 1 4 - L lit L / ^ ` ' ` -PA z /9//-,3 A)<:c awif ve - ,77-3'�� a <._, , ./ / e/(si e Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PC Privacy statement- ermosa Beach • PETITION TO.T,E HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL • RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. We, -the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring • commu 'ties, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business xpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCI4, HermBeach Privacy statement When complete, this form will be presented to the Hermosa Rrarh nit./ Council. We will not add names and addr .... +4,.o .,... . NAME ADDRESS a3073 M4iic /6y4,0 Ce *ro/ 7?L : r kc kot vsc 3oc . 0411)(460-1_ 'M. R. ct266 J0114/ FORM zlii-o 44(ot% 0_-g 92 . IV114-14k lo -60 nedm Ca n i uta titkycWie-fritO(a(q244, C k A vv i2- qPI g- /0/l4- 4v‘ ia/J �s . 'EOecc,l,r9--ik," 2 t t22. 2 P7- Kov:-,. A -ii, A-ii ,0d1 ?‘,:,, 4rAot P42414 Lkoi 1 i Oe doo ill q m44116 61"..4d -eit - - ( bita 4 -1 -?,it i," 3 LAG likTr=gi) 10 P - 6 - - - - t — ivI.Ae YJ-k-AA-t.ia 5-0(.(c_.5-(1-, ti--,,_mp&v3_,:o.,,(:.', 1 ,. I�Autk I4-c� � ovt. 1 �i �l t SI- 4: (C:n 0113 ' t oggaic (AtVithla Plell MD 'Re IN./ Dirt/ ' CA. 102-19— 1 - g - df LAC IlAd /%C6/i1 �a3vilf/oBua-cr/C- fA r902.77 / , 11741: AYwi Slater 103'3 ,'t/ G i?eclondo i3 Acw- - 9c Z .lOir / �r- cca / Sh, f g36 f -1-,-c S i o,vio$eoe � C , o z 7 7 -,J r)(1 - 7 v / b'41‘1, rliwr14 Oi /1/(,,A-1-4,1 J \J #I"a �• .o i,/;--ec-,,,4t;c3/=qoz Y, -/ Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCI4, HermBeach Privacy statement When complete, this form will be presented to the Hermosa Rrarh nit./ Council. We will not add names and addr .... +4,.o .,... . • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL • MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS . N •• 6p14,71-uoy,b Jr ( IN ' .� 11` ,��"� 1 /►N �` .�i , I3YeJ2IYcJ1I a Ig iM hmstrve R'edr0 ,0; i A/ 14.04(A. EIdv1AU,w 2926 (-0 6"115 L,1/ e -i -Ac 'D, C/-' 1-1,/Cf /. R C Y-- L� w s 400 z tottumv.-b 1k -k .talo 1 1 z---Peagiv._ .L.0_9,-Vt..-\ 6-ralwAitykk,\Iik--0,L,Ve%11a.-- Of % ...410i 1'' • ''A e•- dir 691-7. a/M1gvvs r 4.793 )ST L (A.-,Ptctro , I '/ feiiiiii-Cog,(Y !7o1fiwLN,1p7f ' .-o744017 grit1 .,—= � ,, , ,./. // ''a a/ 1/ /41A lektro50,1. 4t) b7aN7r06 t%v/`'lA(h10247 _,_ 917 i,r4 a raV r&do,do,rc L • La 50711- ,,,-,frixor iY//?n?/ 0147 2,SZ PG g a, �,��J 27, /1D1 ?i b 32 l- CAtiVE S I t Lri IJo CA il • IIr -5 N), -D .-,wA- 3-10 q-.-7-) ►-7.„0 -if (r,but----v ease send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement C> 11/ PETITION , RE�=EEVED MAY 2 3 2002 TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. 'Qic5cfc,N Dem {l✓e94/ -11)wi P\Q*& Grill q150v 857 VerJ-v %,7 j'& ///7Lr-AAaq 3 ,e6,,da Ikea gm*u �IeuFi)pitlei 1Z4(4 Cu .,,, Pew) 6ze aelff,911 £4ONkinsN > Vt%lov.oki 1/wnid trek -6 3310 Eypii L1V4F/141-Pazfu�/1FirtCf 92831 g3ov( 13 W ,iloshere, . veni-u'zt,, 101vick ' Lo t 3g_ r • 01-'•612t LAS . 153g(A)�Z�'s I LwN.2_ 1/11( I- L11;3[ /79Z G Vti/ & DP j1i Sova gl R SER,/A�r S al i Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermoh Privacy statement When complete, this form will be presented to the Hermosa Beach City Council. We will not add namF+c ani+ • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL • RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS \ t A ;IRE .off nAkz -Z__‘,10 T 7°U- ik__ f6«— lit I Yi Ula-5ijk; failke i4''t 11'411 zkThlkt 510 Go/M KS/ ome 4° _ air _ slirj‘ 154-- An v%j«4- /yam f,, A- s-/- At, -/R, c i4- Pirl `' 1 iiticti Qic% V c-+OrS.Vo^ r 0(,Fe:9/)7.,, /� %��q ��C/'�'//� f�`•, j�i����. ,�/ i` -, 1. �� 7 4/ 4 1 4, i 1 , gek vim. Szt VQ-c4a--.AgcL I -ix. r• # ' fs$ i. rArk tek 1=leit4A;i2te 4441 it\1 6011%- 1(64,1/ ' A l'•4, i 0/24K AW CALI a 544-1 64_ 94 "ro) CA11151 7,,,-/,f,,, /,/ / - r Ci-rz,s ei,rfel2 2 yo7 - G re -4-" ` `y -vx- D4 I' CI Co 1 u d (` ZZ o 1. 612-041/40-1 ' -O a .1. t %\ z 14644C/ rro4t a __ / 0 a----qa, L, ,,, 361 ?O ri 24L- g— AM"1 ' ,w• yeteei c£4I c 0V g w'r' 1S'oC Fl/ ioii4%U' LA 011/ MO1'rto : A1:y_:.., i Er L L .o. .i r 011 A� 7/ 7 m kJ e1r`S (poi L iiZEN74- A•vf, Ric Vt»ew `kill) C 4 I00, isoh "1ctK Ave 6 eecvroo di34),AcleN * z..._ ease send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beac Privacy statement P � ETITIO N TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL 41/ RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE L ' ,_ . n_ %� 1` 464 �c,cQ G.- l cc...l'�.�s • -.—•ft+• GP , -y e -t\1 0 _rep.. 2'-c 6 -its-y (417.16- C um►i 1 ►L i co -440 /rdfr 2__LS', • &,c5--(4•Al-de-65e- ('7 (0 STian(`-T E, , L TOa rwle.. MO 9_62a_ -E- rr i Than co_ ra , Lh\u R t\L- tt ii 0 ELSot) Av.8, VANN &IA•ilcukALR P4N VAL:wrr t 1 '7 / S - uv2 s °Av L.A. w .-.--e itCfrit^ iclb4-- re-- i 3 ,Mi (4 L7 k /f 14-1i - - E(c/ frdl (566 41 L5/ /1„ I°I\)? Di V(9 62(0 d1. i(WO°P5 -fr-' I [7p Di cafe 3ig Corocec rk (=1 Y ,4,1 ---791tez•tkRug-t ,c),91_ .*r-ofteit,Lu E )1 1 Gi 1 Ui o^ Gog ��.)z2- airr o ,,,� U R , 4�$I o. Roe/ to* ...z.-/ Atrrat41.44 t, K : (4 Cv i '` 4- . ,../„___3_.e_e /s1 i.; /v ; • • . _ ,ri_ .G. 5e , aa((W 'L' mimic.. 1?� �' 1 .......„).1,.., ��• /;! .',J . Lb III[i.. " Tl____ ___A __• 'L' 4# , ,1 a�' ; pleted petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement When complete, this form will be presented to the Hermosa Beach City Council. We will not add names and addresses on this form tn �9 •• P IT 0 J" S • I D S - ie ET ION Rc 1111► TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL MAY 2 3 2002 We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa CBeacn DEVa�Eneighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE -Tim l ick Cs- AArili (ire 4- Jv,1 o YJi CA . '' 71 Cathc12ini ?ems ow r- ta,,lrc.� iaB rte,, t --^,0t-`Kor.00,4A``I(\� (9-a-0 S Csam.ELs‘A Lam. c10 -Ar eikscsAl\mA REED a0606 J\& -Thy -ToRizi cF 4 C( t 5 001140(2A1- 5 13 C_t_ v s; . /AQ (_61 04-0_.&Ck \ QA \ 0 A, to 1/73 c-,41-0,))63',-, (,6 i2'6,6 IiI 4deXiSA-1 iwf? 2100SVeffl v 1C�. i e -y'. - s 1._g_Unard peePF I I y -y- w.23 rd sf 'SP* P 7j CA `1073( [4.,&(/)- -us-i-vo Ii -c DBC s 9 7y► w 160714 s -I- ,oar (t .' io, PA., C) Ameo 444- I V (-Ds r - A r` k, ii -40,11„... PIam * .ews po.Qox gs2A a (osv ddow / , / . Sna)16,--- 0 II o2 ffi/(a_T-Tiw,DT i& 73C,k. / G 1111/. Mo c.`y,.d 'Igo() Plctut cif:P athc t: SOD °(eSu . 0_,0 Yife lu,S Oil -at) 2 2-13 Fz slr-_v Lt Wed , L...tsPc totk 2-.z%3 Fs i- Cr Q. aao to Pr A I ii /; re L 11 ei & • ; IA lf� .m k. 4,,,1/ttea, Gto , j to ue (/o 2 7- -2- i A4 (Le. --S 4 b m l j 41 i-,,,„ &ts' Nif^Tr-N,©_ i ,Z --- ease send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement When complete this form will be nrecenterl to the ri„ rn..n..0 we ..,.0 n..+ ,AAA ._z ._ PETITION • ou-t K. 5 • REaEevE4 MAY 2 3 2002 TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL COM. DEV DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGNAT RE y�� /►iAAT,N wWaYe,AR0, 1-700D s ws7W/V ASL G�/s, 20--r'1 ' f ell- cr 2 e--r'14/436' /24i • '241 1 & Q y 1i£, c4 9ao8 /y\' ,,��,,4�II c ei eXatirl IWU S. et' t # 1 eedon-10 Oetar h. aid 9OZ l yntie., ' -vt e)c'Oc � _c e� 11 5.� --\ 'ked.0,, Q o...sc c 4o- - -- 63 ' '40 GurkIlei W,IIoa`D &„ 'Nal �1/ Aare() Oorq-e-2_ Moo f �I. e^-4,: x ft 'os ib eopiwo,o54,,,,,q;s ?I `f 1--C 7oz77 /' t s\; Sd35/4--vvia,,•41,0e.- re,ceic 4o xrcfL. Acts- a 32._OP r iii i 1` 3/ -1474 pit 4--,04 res/ 7;R�.✓c.t ,,�. Je>1 v=im , 7 �� C -11 /.: �,% `, ;4-5'o zyviax2/� pg "Art or/ ,f .. G too 63 /Lt r. cL IV /I Let F / re5Q rya/ / c9 4m t mi }a c a� _. �. /I D 1\ C O (.I 0 6iA-a v� L9 T cwt ,,,r- �% 141414% ,...3.(11- 3 A )---Aenctr•Irjl`q135,0PA . 0„0‘e--3 -6 ' .4% NI vo,10.01*, �. 11 )1S5 2� 13+ # A I ' (.7210 ( �`'�/ 6 ‘IT‘e, - ,..' . a ./, 9-7:P- A In fai-)-44-6 44..)--2AP,- , r IV !ri pe p Av. ,zi._(- 71- c-,-/-- oatg 0.-k) It), 6" /...tioWTV PA' PU*1� - • , :\i oe_ --_____EgLi-1--AcAlA___ -1/0.--,ArrAi 7 Please send comple{ed petition forms to The PitcTier House, 142 PC fl II rmosa. Beach Privacy statement When complete thio fnrm will ha nracontarl to the 4lermnce Gn . 1 .. (`ro mall ure ..an . a as .....l aa. - __ •- 5/ • PETITION RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS - N TUR (w,gnr- 7)e. / CI t *Oki �C�S(nva v`'l0Vd- a TC04- n 4 I raved ` / j4 , L.'.1 , it1. D.ek '1°4'27 W SIOPr 5.S7 4W pp- 5.1z `r'1 YlP ) Al 109 N Brood R.B. goa-ri i‘Ak-iiek zni?) -Few. thi. LuvDiCil cAl ci k42 s 6Ly Sts1 5-24 s c Aiodho Ile 0 . b•---1- Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Privacy statement When complete, this form will be presented to the Hermosa Beach City Council. wp win --A osa Beach SZ • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL • RECE64/E® MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and -civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS, NAT • E F7, -P �Y ziZ�,vitzsd-4/ � �a7� .r, , ; , --% "ic4+ u) ' Z m L(J (L Z I 02-0 /MOF.: ,. qkl E__ AP ri `ivso3 /; a do 13t 2 FsP 1a naaga_f(01/41CA- , / "I4 � (4n y l 4 L 1 2�-zy i),, . I gni Qa.tcm -C �12 n � vD0 A p0 �x S L(1 �:.�a�-��o�2c�1n°I�L.�? 'Q�� ` t 444k €r i k f L 7 g„ 3-q- 3 S-eiik e al. itrc, ( 9D 051 d ji�- EST -WV au vit0 &750 WR-L/4/PO RP Kt{R,Yv!u, - i ` / k asotl Jtd-r re, 13dx 316) Ah}ik'lrat✓ B&di ;TS ii) VI 411C4ket /4cv,ii-I- 3selosv-vt14'/Avcl, `Ztig t/eo%' yy,2�.-- A' SAACTRV11A,v. I w1)M4l FraptIkvi .-14.e,. -01170),/ t`' C:R771-e 54 d�-ge g /t/� S y '!J' i�4 7vikeyea.tivia- P (L Ali a ��! ,-7� C\i`65 '.7fr>7hc y 96 15Ig iNti/%roIlSr e<< i J71 1403 FsP lanc a T.5. ,; ,/1•, git(kb dt(ckt)6. 74. Nth kiik UN i R k. /FPO) - ey"4 ,_ fr11.5 . r`�sz, /-7'501,) Fa I eo7 1�✓e . /�i,-cio S / C i- S 2.I1J(CL •P 1 lie . Z� �1oY l-1 . L _ 9 . , (n caii.Jl 2 . 4iii 'C tide, - Com,- t' J tie'.J l/ l i ki,fit ti .Qt'v l r_l--/ ' .62eAry1714-Fir Please send completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, rmdsa Beac Privacy statement When complete, this form will be presented to the Hermosa Beach City Council. We will not add names and addresses on this form to • • PETITION TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE _ a .._I Jo aliM Mie/14011 l L/off Z.s LJ.e A o.lc�o e� 4 o z, zt9c OIZcg, e4L#e .g �� ,r� ,aetiON.p' / Itj t;'\(\ --fl \ I \ 1\()Crt 2 g 54C t414A94‘;1:4C- _ OP 'cJ�Aaf C• 1_ 4 •241.-0( Allb..k.... 1___kpf-_,_, it _ P IL •if\-tv 61 w ,o -r -c -,q a 1Wo WM/ .lid ccs e 0 ei-ertl- ‘, • . Ata S • rre , r 0y ' . (dl F s 2(-(I 4561 /rte , 9`9127 . ► 1L. NililAillakri 102/ 3LI UhpvCI Li4 1) fill G C5 ,p,,rvv, ••. :1 c' /S 6-g_&.(-0 I f I 0 won A-✓., - 7s" N 12 2/ Ediond 177 tih Y7s6s4a.. ��t /,�^ .I, eA emiliflaf - l,727 2�� 14 i.7/7 ik .: ►� W t klf-vr 2,iS fs,) . .Ato.y,,x4/ or .,,,_41/n VA qol- 3z_ Avk Mpos•hi\r4 .71 j_4=1 co3roz1f) (f_t\C-IA CeNCI123-7 Icct A&1 U (k i- `LjA t k 0 Mr, Oda_ i i\i\NW ()Oa \ V "P(6 • P' .;r te ease send completed petitioii'forms to 'the Pitcher House, 142 PC ermosa Beach Privacy statement WhP_n rmmnIete this form will ha nrnconlnrl fn flhn 4Aarmncn -J --- LL:. S--- �_ • PETITION ji • TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL JEOk MAY 2 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT We, the undersigned, as concerned residents of Hermosa Beach and neighboring communities, patrons of The Pitcher House, community and civic leaders, business owners and taxpayers, URGE the City Council to adopt the UNANIMOUS decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Department, and GRANT The Pitcher House, one of our oldest business establishments, a full liquor license. NAMEtt�� ADDRESS SIGNATURE rIc&i / /G< c "ft.:42.7'r ,she.,,,.., Dak 09 ,q,/-43 X , ,i—eel O/� J10 r -1 Lr r(jo-fto a Ito COr,MIIr. -I. q, TOS' ivor iio1(Y��ci CA- Mu� / f �y N I � • . � , I sd7 "' I ua IN:- n o r'1 11' I !AZ C 90 07 --� �� .: -1� - y/ ' /1./.....-..--.-- ��- /- �} 5t i &j lvkV1G, Ai. - - '% /,,,/, Y ;/,,y2l %-ff Si, c€ -f- P14,4 ,,,-, Irl ¶c,.1 . / . �..v� Ca c� , _i3(.,./i� Li �� Ai '4 j)e .. f) CAA...) l� or lit It MT 5 `)[}-3i'd.. ,1. ^1 Part -.r/. 7.4 n 7.3C /2�.St) geg 44,1114i1;1,1 $Cater%, M 9Q- p Yez.010 & ac 7 S^ 2-a DC7 tip•( rY°ti _Si #�( J _ . 0114F° Q rvIf II _ • L ease sena completed petition forms to The Pitcher House, 142 PCH, Hermosa Beach Privacy statement When complete, this form will be presented to the Hermosa Beach City Council. We will not add names and addresses on this form to any database or mailing list. nor disclose them tr, r,thA..,�.$ May 23, 2002 • • TO: Kathy Dunbabin, Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council of Hermosa Beach FROM: James Curnutt Hermosa Beach Resident RE: Review and Reconsideration of the Planning Commission's approval of a minor change to the Conditional Use Permit for Alta Dena Dairy With regard to the proposed change of hours for the Alta Dena Dairy's Conditional Use Permit, I wholeheartedly support allowing this business to extend hours of operation. As a resident of Hermosa Beach for 22 years, residing in the 1700 block of Manhattan Avenue, a mere 1 ''A blocks from the Dairy, I feel qualified to give you a fair and unbiased opinion. Since 1981, the owner, Won Sam Ahm (Won), has continued to maintain and upgrade his building and grounds. He has remained steadfast in turning a rundown, shabby business location into today's clean, well-run local market offering dairy products as well as fresh fruit, sundries, ice cream, beer and wine. No doubt the last two items are the only troublesome items. I am asking for your approval for the proposed change in hours for the following reasons: 1. Convenience - Local residents can walk or bike to shop at a local market. 2. Community Security — This business provides a well -lit corner that I find to be somewhat like a "community watch." Knowing that Won is there, later in the evening, watching out for my neighborhood is comforting. He has summoned the Police on several occasions when they were needed. 3. Beer and Wine — Opponents to extended hours, including an adjacent liquor store, say this change could add to the alcohol-related problems of downtown Hermosa. The young adults frequenting the downtown bars and restaurants cause the noise and disruption as they leave these establishments. I don't see them dropping into Alta Dena Dairy for a can of beer or a bottle of wine while looking for their cars. If anything, they will go to Robert's Liquors on the promenade or Abe's Liquors on Pier Avenue where they can purchase pints, half-pints, or individual shots of liquor. I know, I watch the parade of people walking down my street, Manhattan Avenue, in search of their cars. I strongly urge you to approve the extended hours for Alta Dena Dairy. This is a "Mom and Pop" local market, staffed solely by the owners. I have faith in Won to continue running a respectable business even at 2 am on Saturday. He has invested 21 years of his life making this market respectable and truly deserves your support. His business is an asset to our City providing convenience as well as watching out for our community and its security. I have watched the changes in my neighborhood for 22 years and feel confident in my assessment in this matter. Unfortunately, I had a conflict and cannot attend this meeting or you would have heard my reasons in person. Thank you for considering my opinions in the course of your deliberation. SUPPLEMENTAL 5c INFORMATIONN! 05/24/2002 15:23 3107983015 925 Second Street Hermosa Beach, Californi. MBE #1419 PAGE 02/03 Community Development Department, Planning Division Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 May 20, 2002 • Re: Review And Reconsideration of On -Sale General Alcohol Permit at 142 Pacific Coast Highway, The Pitcher House Because I live just a few houses east of The Pitcher House I am all too painfully aware of its presence, especially on weekends. In the evening, the crowds outside its door make it difficult to walk on the sidewalk. One cannot help feeling menaced when she does attempt to pass because the customers are quick to offer comments upon looks, age and, in their minds, general unsuitability to be in the vicinity. One can smell the alcohol fueling the unpleasant laughter that accompanies these remarks. Alcohol also feeds an implicit threat of violence. The only conclusion a reasonable person can draw from this experience is that The Pitcher House is not a safe place. Consequently, my street is not safe. This feeling is reinforced on weekends. Fridays and Saturdays, the crowds get noisy early and stay noisy so that very late at night one can hear loud laughter, yelling and screaming. Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish whether the screaming and yelling are from pleasure or from fear. Because its customers park on .my block this noise is often right outside my door_ I hope that no windows will be broken, graffiti scrawled on walls and broken bottles left on lawns. This latter hope is often futile. Morning brings bottles, glasses, cigarette butts, napkins --all the accouterments of alcohol drinking. Moreover, although there is only parking on one side of the street, patrons of this establishment solve their parking dilemma by using both sides of the street so that the road is unsafe. It is not unusual to see cars drive the wrong way up the hill on the one- way street. While I cannot prove that these drivers came for The Pitcher House, because alcohol stimulates dangerous impulses it is not an unfair inference_ All these conditions exist now when The Pitcher House has only a limited alcohol license. One can only cringe at the idea that a general license will be issued.. The equation is simple: more alcohol means more problems for Hermosa Beach residents in the immediate area. Additionally, one most answer the question of what the issuance of yet another alcohol permit will mean to Hermosa Beach in general. Hermosa 1 of 2 5/24/2002 11:59 AM SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 05/24/2002 15:23 3107983015 MBE #1419 Beach is no longer known •r its beautiful beach, its sen• of community, the excellence of its schools.or its casual style of living. Instead, it is the `party Town", the "Beach of Bars'', the place where members of other communities come to carouse and get drunk. The prime police problems in this city are public drunkenness, DuI, public urination and violation of personal property laws. The solution to this problem is not to add yet another bar to the many we already have. I am well aware that The Pitcher House has been on its corner for many years_ However, Hermosa Beach, itself, is changing. So far, the changes look positive and the area is becoming an even more desirable place to live than before. Nothing should be done to destroy this image_ Hermosa Beach does not need to be the Beach Bar capital of the South Say. The Pitcher House should not be issued an on -sale general alcohol permit. Sincerely, Sandra Canter Cc: Michael Keegan City Council Members 2of2 5/24/2002 11:59 AM Play 26 02 08:OOp Thomas M. Costales • • • (3101 379-4980 p-1 THOMAS M. COSTALES 1018 2' STREET HERMOSA BEACH. CA 90254 (310) 379-4980 tcostalesadelphia.net facsimile transmittal To: Hermosa Beach City Council Fax: (310) 372-6186 From: Tom Costales Fax: (310) 379-498(1 Re: Pitcher House Liquor Permit Pages: 1 Date; 5/26/2002 El urgent El For Review 0 Please Comment D Please Reply • w • • • • • • • Ladies and Gentleman: Please do not allow the Pitcher House to obtain a full liquor permit They are bad enough as it stands. About six months ago, one of their patrons spent the night on my front lawn. He was very obnoxious when I asked him to get off my property in the morning. Messrs. Reviczky, Yoon, Keegan and Ms. Dunbabin, I voted for all of you last year. Please take care of this and don't let me down. I also hope that you, Mr. Edgerton, stop this liquor license which hurts my neighborhood. Sincerely, Tom Costales SUPPLEMENTAL S INFORMATION 05/28/2002 08:22 3102606496 May 28, 2002 Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 THE TRILLIUM GROUP • • Re: Pitcher House liquor permit. PAiaL U2 Dear Hermosa Beach City Council Members, My wife, Cheryl, and I live a few doors up 2nd street from the Pitcher House. This bar is a constant source of noise, litter and beer bottles in front of our home and in our street. The current situation would deem that this establishment and its patrons should be policed more diligently. The issuance of a general liquor license will only serve to further deteriorate an already bad situation. As Hermosa Beach residents and homeowners, we urge you to reject their request for this permit. We need to protect the quality of life in our community. Thank you. Michael & Cheryl DeMucci 905 2nd Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 376-8258 SUPPLEMENTAL 5d INFORMATION MAY -28-2002 03:19 PM EMDOWNS May 28, 2002 13103728125 • • Eleanor Downs 1 diad MaPits d, 372 bEwni lisoh. CA 00264 14 FAX 310 372 8125 Eoowms36C4014om TO: Hermosa. Beach City Council Tonight on the Agenda there is a hearing for the Pitcher House to have a full liquor permit. As a resident on 2nd Street for 30 years I do not agree that a full liquor permit is in the best interest of the residential area that surrounds the Pitcher House. The additional business that might entail from this new permit would only cause the situation that now exists, ie. lack of parking, their customers hanging out on the sidewalk until late hours of the night, to expand. In addition, it is common at closing of the Pitcher House to have their customers drive full speed up Second Street, in which driving down Second Street only is permitted. When the present owner purchased the business he knew that wine and liquor only was permitted and that is what he is entitled to. Sincerely, gym• �)o— SUPPLEMENTAL S fNFOFiAhA71oN F'. N1 From: Judith Metzen To: Hermosa Beach City Council Date: 5/28/2002 Time: 10:54:08 AM FACSIMILE COVER PAGE • rage i at 1 To : Sent : Subject : Hermosa Beach City Council 5/28/2002 at 10:54:06 AM Pitcher House Liquor Permit From : Pages : Judith Metzen 1 (Including Cover) Council Members: I live on 2nd. St. about 50 yards East of the Pitcher House. Several times a month we are awakened at closing time by extremely loud patrons of that establishment. I have called the police who have come out to the house, but too late to encounter the noisemakers. Furthermore, customers park in front of our houses and drive the wrong way on the street to get a parking place. They leave debris on our property, beer bottles and other trash. I have been to this establishment at the invitation of the owner. It is clear to me that no "upscal'e patrons will attend this bar, even if a full liquor permit is granted. We don't need more traffic or crime related to drunken individuals at all hours of the day and night in our neighborhood. We petition you to REFUSE THE PERMIT FOR A FULL LIQOUR LICENSE! Respectfully Submitted, Judith & Phillip Metzen 920 2nd. St. SUPPLEMENTAL 5d INFORMATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 P.C. RESOLUTION 97-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, TO ALLOW ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE BEER AND WINE, AT 142 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 44, AND NORTHERLY 50.69 FT. OF LOTS 45 & 46 HOME BUILDERS PLACE TRACT. The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Gary Cullen, business owner of the Pitcher House located at 142 Pacific Coast Highway, seeking approval of an amended Conditional Use Permit to allow entertainment. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the subject application on October 21, 1997, at which time testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The applicant is proposing to add an entertainment stage and dance floor to an existing alcohol establishment. 2. The proposed entertainment with a Conditional Use Permit and the dance floor are permitted uses in the zone the property is located, commercial Specific Plan Area number 7. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Conditional Use Permit: A. The subject premises is already approved for on -sale beer and wine and the applicant is requesting an amendment to modify the interior floor plans to add an entertainment stage ; B. The site is zoned Commercial Specific Plan Area, and is suitable for the proposed use with the proposed amendment; C. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding commercial uses; D. The imposition of conditions as required by this resolution will mitigate any negative impacts on nearby residential or commercial properties; 5d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 E. The amendment is Categorically Exempt from the requirement for an environmental assessment pursuant to Section 15301 class 1 ("...involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing....") of the California Environmental Quality Act Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the subject Conditional Use Permit, subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans received and reviewed by the Commission at their meeting of October 21, 1997. Any minor modification shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 2. The hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00 A.M. and 2:00 A.M. daily. 3. Entertainment shall be limited to the "entertainment stage" as shown on submitted plans on file. 4. Live entertainment shall be limited to using non -amplified instruments such as a piano guitar, violin, etc. If entertainment is to include amplified (use of electrical amplifier) musical instruments, an acoustical study shall be prepared by an acoustical expert, including proposed sound dampening features to baffle and direct sound away from the entrance/exit and window areas to ensure compliance with the noise ordinance. Said study and sound dampening features shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and shall be implemented in the building. A. The acoustical study shall be based on the worst-case scenario, or on a sound level that will not be exceeded at any given time. B. Management shall be responsible for the music/entertainment volume levels. C. During the performance of any live entertainment, the exterior doors and windows shall remain closed. 5. An air conditioning system shall be installed of an adequate size, to air condition the entire building, prior to any entertainment activity being conducted on the premises. SECTION VI General operating and standard conditions: 1. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 2. The business shall prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business, or in the immediate area. 3. The Police Chief may determine thata continuing police problem exists and may, subject to the review of the Planning Commission, direct the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to eliminate the problem. If the problem persists the Chief then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 which will automatically initiate a review of this Conditional Use Permit by the Commission. 4. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained free of graffiti at all times. 5. Any changes to the interior layout which alter the primary function of the restaurant shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 6. The project and the continued operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 7. The hours for live entertainment shall be limited to the hours between 4:00 P.M. to 1:15 A.M. Monday through Friday, and from 9:00 A.M. to 1:15 A.M. on Saturday, Sundays, and Federal and State Holidays, Cinco De Mayo, and St. Patrick's day. 8. Management shall be responsible for the music/entertainment volume levels. 9. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the city's noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments. SECTION VII This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the 'conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid an enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation'of these conditions. Section VIII The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. VOTE: AYES: Comm. Perrotti, Merl, Schwartz, Pizer, Chmn. Tucker. NOES: none ABSENT: none ABSTAIN: none CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 97-65 is a true and complete record of the action taken the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular mee 'ng f October 21, 1 •7. Peter Tucker, Ch firman Sol lume •ld, ' ecretary //-4-97 Date 4 cur979r i • May 23, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council • Regular Meeting of May 28, 2002 MASTER PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR CITY YARD Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Dougherty and Dougherty Architects to complete a study of feasibility of jointly using the City Yard for both agencies. Background: The City Council received a report at the April 23, 2002 meeting concerning the joint use of the City Yard by the City and School District maintenance operations. Staff was directed to return with a proposal to determine whether or not the concept is feasible. The School District has agreed to pay half of the cost of the Master Plan Study. I have attached a proposal from Dougherty and Dougherty to perform the work. Dougherty and Dougherty is the firm now working with the School District on their building needs. The proposal is $5,750 plus the costs of reimbursed expenses. I received a second proposal at a cost of $15,000 from another firm that the City worked with on the Fire Station. The fact that Dougherty and Dougherty already has a working knowledge of the School District's needs contributes to difference in the cost. Dougherty and Dougherty has been well received by the School District for their work on the School District Project. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 7a Dougherty+Dougherty Architects LLP Architecture Planning Interior Design 3194 D Airport Loop Costa Mesa California 92626-3405 Tel: 714.427.0277 Fax: 714.427.0288 www.ddaia.com • • Dougherty:: Dougherty May 9, 2002 Mr. Stephen Burrell City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Re: Master Planning and Programming Services for City of Hermosa Beach and Hermosa City School District Maintenance Facility Dear Steve: Dougherty + Dougherty is pleased to submit this proposal for Planning and Programming Services to study the proposed combined City of Hermosa Beach and Hermosa City School District Maintenance Facility. We understand that the concept is for these facilities to occupy a shared site, but to maintain their operational and administrative autonomy. The key elements of this study include: • Articulation of the space and operational needs for a shared City and School District Maintenance Facility. The goal is to both create a shared facility and to gain some economies through this sharing. • Create a conceptual plan that demonstrates the relationships of the program needs, addresses any special equipment needs and represents the operational organization of the site to meet the joint needs of the two user groups. • Develop a list and description of all special equipment needs and systems needs associated with a maintenance type facility including those code required elements for environmental protection. • Recommend implementation strategies that include both re use of the existing facility and the creation of a new facility. Dougherty + Dougherty, through our relationship with the Hermosa City School District, has previously developed an understanding of the Maintenance Facility needs for the School District. Personal interviews will be utilized to develop a similar assessment of the needs for the City. This joint assessment will be translated into a project program that will determine square footage requirements, relationships between various functions, operational and scheduling issues in a joint use facility, opportunities for shared economies of operation, special equipment and systems along with conceptual costs for the alternative project approaches. The final report will be presented to the City in a forum selected by the City Manager. • • PROPOSAL FOR JOINT USE CITY/SCHOOL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE FACILITY May 9, 2002 Page 2 The proposed fee to achieve the above noted scope of work is a fixed fee of $5,750 plus reimbursable expenses. These reimbursables are limited to reproduction and delivery/messenger costs incurred in the direct implementation of this scope of work. The reimbursables will be billed on a monthly basis as they are incurred at direct cost plus 15%. We are prepared to proceed immediately upon receipt of authorization from the City of Hermosa Beach. We look forward to the opportunity to be of services. If there are any questions please feel free to call. Sincerely/ 1 Brian Paul Dougherty, FAIA Partner BPD:abs w:\2002 projects\20201 hermosa beach usd\proposalcity of hermosa facility 5-9-02.doc • • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON� An EDISON INTERNATIONAL® Company MAY , . f 2002 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT PROPOSED RATE CHANGE Application 02-05-004 On May 3, 2002, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) filed a General Rate Case (GRC) Application with the California Public Utilities Commission (Commission) . In this application, SCE asks for authority to collect base rate revenues of $3.065 billion, effective in 2003. Base rate revenues are revenues required to pay for all of SCE's operation and maintenance expenses (excluding fuel and purchased power expenses) , as well as depreciation expenses, income taxes, and other taxes, and to provide a return on invested capital. If approved by the Commission, our request would result in a $286 million increase or 10.3 percent over currently authorized revenues. However, approval of our request would not increase overall customer rates, due to a settlement agreement between SCE and the Commission. We are making this request now because the Commission requires us to file a GRC Application one year before the effective date of the revenue change. In addition to the proposed 2003 revenue change, SCE's application also proposed an estimated base rate revenue decrease of $78 million (-2.2%) in 2004 and a $116 million increase (3.23%) in 2005. The actual increase or decrease in these years will be determined by the Commission prior to the beginning of each year. In this GRC, the Commission will determine the reasonable level of our investments and certain expenses for the three-year period 2003- 2005, (fuel and purchased power expenses are reviewed in a separate proceeding) . The Commission will use the amount of expenses, investments, and a rate of return (which it determines annually) to • • calculate Edison's base rate revenues. The Commission will then set customer rate levels that will allow Edison to recover the calculated base rate revenues. SCE requests that certain customer service fees be increased as well. Specifically, SCE requests an increase in the charges for Returned Checks, Service Establishment or Reconnection and Field Assignment charges. SCE also requests the establishment of a Residential Late Payment Charge. In addition, SCE has proposed an increase in Added Facilities rates for specific customer requests beyond installation of standard facilities. Summary of Reasons Supporting SCE's Request This application is necessary to establish authorized revenues for service effective in 2003. The key reasons for SCE's requested increase are: 1. We are making substantial capital investments to replace aging distribution infrastructure and business systems. 2. We are experiencing increased costs to remove and dispose of utility distribution infrastructure, such as poles and transformers that are no longer useful. 3. We are experiencing high rates of inflation in the costs of health care and other benefits. How Our Request May Affect Customer Revenues Shown below is an estimate of how revenue from various customer classes will be affected. Estimated Impact Of This Request 2003 2003 Increase Effect on Increase Over Total 2003 Customer Group $ Million Revenue (%) Rates (%) Domestic (Residential) 112.2 3.2 0.0 Lighting - Small & Medium Power 101.1 2.4 0.0 Large Power 62.6 2.1 0.0 Agricultural & Pumping 9.3 2.7 0.0 Street & Area Lighting 1.2 1.2 0.0 TOTAL 286.4 2.6 0.0 2 • • This application does not address how the Commission should allocate GRC revenues among customer classes. The allocation of costs among classes of customers will be addressed in a subsequent phase. Also, as stated above, the increased revenues will come from current rates. The increases for the years 2004 and 2005 will be based on the revenue allocation and rate design procedures adopted by the Commission in a later phase of this proceeding. Evidentiary Hearings on Our Request The Commission will be conducting evidentiary hearings on our request. At these hearings, representatives of the Company, interested parties, and the Commission's independent Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) will present testimony. The Commission Welcomes Your Participation and Comments The Commission will issue decisions on our application after public participation hearings and formal evidentiary hearings. Both types of hearings are conducted before an Administrative Law Judge, who is sometimes joined by one or more of the Commissioners. The public participation hearings allow members of the public an opportunity to express their opinions on our application. At the more formal evidentiary hearings, sworn testimony is heard from Edison representatives, interested parties, and the ORA. The ORA employees include engineers, accountants, economists, attorneys, and other professionals. They independently evaluate utility proposals and present their analyses and recommendations to the Commission. The Commission can accept, reject, or modify the recommendations of any of the parties. Therefore, the approved rates or the adopted ratemaking mechanisms may differ from those requested. After the public participation hearings are scheduled, we will notify you of their time and place. For Further Information If you want advice on how to participate in these hearings, or wish to make comments to the Commission, please write to: The Public Advisor's Office California Public Utilities Commission 320 West Fourth Street, Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90013 E -Mail: Public.advisorlagcpuc.ca.gov • • Your letter will be sent to the Commissioners and become part of the formal correspondence file for Application No. 02-05-004. If you have questions or need further information, please indicate you would like a response; otherwise no reply will be sent. When writing, please mention Application No. 02-05-004. If you wish further information from Edison regarding this application, please write to: Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, CA 91770 Attention: Russell G. Worden General Rate Case Project Manager For Further Information In addition to contacting the CPUC at the address listed above, if you want more information about Application 02-05-004 please see our Web site at sce.com or write to SCE at: SCE, Corporate Communications, P.O. Box 800, Rosemead, CA 91770. You may review a copy of our application and related exhibits at our corporate headquarters (2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, Rosemead, CA 91770) , or at the Los Angeles office of the CPUC at the address show above, or at any of SCE's business offices listed below: 30553 Rimrock Rd., Barstow, CA 92311 374 Lagoon St., Bishop, CA 93514 505 W. 14th Ave., Blythe, CA 92225 1 Pebbly Beach Rd., Avalon, CA 90704 3001 Chateau Rd., Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 510 S. China Lake Blvd., Ridgecrest, CA 93555 26364 Pine Ave., Rimforest, CA 92378 41694 Dinkey Creek Rd., Shaver Lake, CA 93664 421 W. J St., Tehachapi, CA 93561 6385 Adobe Rd., Twentynine Palms, CA 92277 120 Woodland Dr., Wofford Heights, CA 93285 6999 Old Woman Springs Rd., Yucca Valley, CA 92284 Para solicitar una copia en espanol de esta notification por favor escriba a Southern California Edison, 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, Quad 4A, Rosemead, CA 91770, a la attencion de Corporate Communications. 11073 5/02 4 • May 20, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council • Regular Meeting of May 28, 2002 Department of Community Resources Activity Report for April 2002 The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of April 2002: Recreation Programming: Registration for the spring session of classes and programs continued steadily. Spring Break camp programs and adult excursions proved most popular. Spring Break Day Camps: A program for children 6-11 years of age, Day Campers participated in a variety of recreational activities at South Park. A team of experienced Camp Counselors led participants through an action -packed schedule of events that included sports, group games, arts and crafts, skit performances, scavenger hunts, and an excursion to Surf City Skate Zone in Huntington Beach. Teen Extreme Day Camp, a program for youth 11-14 years of age, joined the younger camp for select combined activities and participated in programs designed specifically for young teens in the South Park Teen Room. Corky Bell's Basketball Camp: Corky's Spring Basketball Camp focused on technique, drills, and game performance. Participants aged 6-12 received individual instruction and coaching from a dynamic instructor who encouraged them during skill development exercises and game play. Skate Track: Many skaters took advantage of extended public skate hours during the week of Spring Break.. Weekend rentals continued to be a popular birthday party venue. Civic Theater Events: April 3 Church of Christ held religious services. April 5 American Theater for the Arts held two performances of Pippi Longstocking for a full house of 500 students. April 5/6 Will Fund, a local non-profit, philanthropic organization, held a special event to kick off their public service programs to an audience of 350. • • April 7 Sokka Gakkai International held religious services. April 9/10/12 Sandpiper Debs, a high school sect of the Sandpiper organization based in the South Bay, held rehearsals and produced a Fashion Show for 500 attendees. April 13 Scottish Fiddlers of Los Angeles held a concert highlighting traditional Scottish music and dances. Attendance including all performers was 500. April14-30 Civic Light Opera of South Bay began set load -in, rehearsals and performances for the April 23 -May 5 run of Driving Miss. Daisy. Special Events: Endless Summer Car Show: Classic American cars from the 1940's through 1970's were prominently displayed on Pier Plaza for one day. No fees were charged. Hermosa Beach Tennis Classic: The City of Hermosa Beach hosted a USTA Sanctioned Tennis competition. Approxi- mately 225 participants including singles, doubles, youth, and adults, competed in the tournament. CBVA Volleyball Tournament: Forty-five adult participants competed the local day long beach volleyball tournament located on the north side of the Pier. Pass-through Event: Richstone Family Center Fundraiser Pier -to -Pier Walkathon using the Hermosa Pier as a turn around point, raised money for the non-profit group that counsels families in need. Excursions: Twenty-nine participants attended the senior excursion to the Palm Springs Follies. The trip included admission to the play, transportation, and time for lunch and shopping downtown. 2 Upcoming Events: May 20 May 25-27 May 25-26 May 28 June 1 June 3 June 7-9 June 16 June 17 June 22 June 24 June 24 June 27 • • Resident Mail -in Registration Begins Fiesta Hermosa CBVA Volleyball Tournament Resident Walk-in Registration Begins Moonlight Horseback Ride Excursion Open Registration Begins Mervyn's Beach Bash Art Beat of Hermosa Telethon Recreation Classes Begin EVP Pro Am Beach Volleyball Tournament Summer Camp Programs Begin Youth Sports Programs Begin Youth Coastal Clean Up DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current Month This Month Last Fiscal Year $41,383 $25,093 Fiscal Year To Date $448,074 Last FY To Date $403,881 REVENUE FY 2001-02 for 83% of the Fiscal Year is: $448,074 or 88% of the projected figure of $512,242 DONATIONS (in addition to Department Revenue): EXPENDITURE FY 2001-02 for 83% of the Fiscal Year is: $677,040 or 75% of the projected figure of $911,838 Respectfully Submitted, Lisa Lynn Recreation Supervisor Concur: $40,413.70 Mary C. Rooney Director, Community Resources Step n Burre City Manager Donor Fiscal Year 01-02 DONATION? Event Date Amount CHEVRON PRODUCTS CO. CHEVRON SURF CAMP JULY, 2001 $4,000.00 SURFRIDER FOUNDATION CHEVRON SURF CAMP JULY, 2001 $1,250.00 MERVYN'S TEEN EXTREME CAMP JULY, 2001 $10,000.00 ANHEUSER-BUSCH SUNSET CONCERTS JULY, 2001 $10,000.00 HAWTHORNE SAVINGS SUNSET CONCERTS JULY, 2001 $10,000.00 WOMEN'S CLUB OF HERMOSA HALLOWEEN HOWL OCTOBER, 2001 $100.00 WOMEN'S CLUB OF HERMOSA TREE LIGHTING OCTOBER, 2001 $100.00 WOMEN'S CLUB OF HERMOSA SAND SNOWMAN CONTEST OCTOBER, 2001 $100.00 ROTARY CLUB OF HERMOSA HALLOWEEN HOWL OCTOBER, 2001 $100.00 HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS HALLOWEEN HOWL OCTOBER, 2001 $250.00 HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS TREE LIGHTING NOVEMBER, 2001 $250.00 SO BAY YOUTH PROJECT TEEN EXTREME SUPPLIES NOVEMBER, 2001 $2,813.70 HAWTHORNE SAVINGS TREE LIGHTING DECEMBER, 2001 $200.00 WOMEN'S CLUB OF HERMOSA EGG HUNT MARCH, 2002 $100.00 HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS EGG HUNT MARCH, 2002 $250.00 CONSOLIDATED DISPOSAL EGG HUNT MARCH, 2002 $500.00 HAWTHORNE SAVINGS EGG HUNT MARCH, 2002 $400.00 $40,413.70 J-Ierriosa's ThanKYou • Hermosa Beach residents David and Margaret Schu- macher were honored with a plaque Saturday for con- tributing $1 million which will help remodel the_ area be- -tween the base of the pier and the downtown plaza. SCH.UMAlailAIR PLAZA.; DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF PAUL WILLIAM SC1 WIMIACHER ' 1919 — 1971 Pictured from the top is David and Margaret Schumacher next to the plaque dedicated to them and David's twin brother, Paul; Mayor Kathy Dunbabin speaks in front of the crowd on the Pier Plaza; and Dunbabin dedicating the plaza to the Schumachers. (photos by Chris Miller) by Whitney Youngs The Hermosa Beach City Council this Saturday af- ternoon will honor residents David and Margaret Schumacher for their generous donation to the pier reno- vation project by dedicating a plaque on the city's downtown pier plaza. As residents of Hermosa Beach for, more than 40 years, the couple in 1999 contributed $1 million Iwhich will be spent on remodeling the area between the base of the pier and the downtown plaza. Hermosa Beach Mayor Kathy Dunbabin will pre- : sent the plaque, which has been dedicated- to the memory of David's twin brother, Paul. The city has yet to begin construction on the proj- ect, which will consist of a new observatory and an amphitheater with granite and brass designs. The city will install the plaque _when the ,project nears completion: "It's so nice to 'see community} support;' said' Dunbabm `They have showed such wonderful ..'gerierosity�-and it's iso ;. HERMOSA BEACH wonderful that they.aie`giving back to the community. They are so proud of this city." Shumacher, _ now 82, has never considered his monetary gift as a donation but more as away of ac: knowledging a city thathe credits with helping him to procure a great deal of wealth: "This city has thebest people and the best climate., in the world, he said "I'came •here. in 1960 and bought one piece of beachfront -property, and Contin- ued to buy six more from 1960 to 1965." At the age of 40, Schumacher had lost most of his money in the 1952 commodities market and traveled (Please turn to Page 5) Schumacher (Continued from cover) to Hermosa Beach, parlaying his remaining funds into a beachfront property along The Strand. Now,' after acquiring properties all over the South. Bay, Schumacher has seen a $15 million return through his real estate in- vestments. He still lives in the' very same house he first purchased in Hermosa Beach. Schumacher, who earned his Ph.D. in philosophy and real estate at Pacific Western University, published the 1992 book, "The Buy & Hold. Real Estate Stra- tegy: How to Secure. Profits in any Real Estate Market," in which he shares his ad- vice on successful real estate ventures. Schumacher then published a second book less than a year ago entitled, "Buy and Hold: 7 Steps to a Real Estate Fortune," which outlines key tips in securing valuable property. Born and raised in Los Angeles, Schu- macher recalled his time as a child vaca- tioning in Hermosa Beach with his family. "It would get very warm during the sum- mer where we lived," he said. "So, my fa- ther would take my brother and me down to Hermosa Beach where he rented a house during that time." Shumacher's gift is the largest sum of money ever given to the city. His donation was generated from the partial interest on a property located at 302 The Strand. Schumacher anticipated the rising costs, associated with the pier renovations and felt his donation would best be served for such a project. Architectural drawings of the pier project will be on displayduring the ceremony. . "The Schumachers are so excited and pleased to give back to the community," added-Dunbabin: "It's -going to be a beauti- fulplaza that willattract the community members to spend time in the downtown." The ceremony will take place on the pier ,plaza, Saturday, April 20, at noon. For more information, call 318-0216. Contributions- make some wonder if Mervyn's is buying the beach ® Officials say donations :to``:city programs are a gesture of good :will. y Whitney Youngs When approving special beach events :such asthe Mervyn's Beach Bash, Hermosa Beach "city .officials have always had to balance concerns about -the beach environment with the desire tosupport popular corn--; munity events. ,This: -.year, -lin in _approving :the Beach 4; Bash,=city' officials scaled back'.the`eveiii to address': concerns that it; was simply getting too;big t Despite this,=<some -in the city are wondering` HERMOSA BEACH whether annual donations by Mervyn's are helping gain approval for an event that otherwise might be more :controversial.. Mervyn's is -giving $40,000 to Hermosa Beach, which will fund _city -sponsored pro- t grams and events."This is `above 'andbeyond the fees actually bein paid for the'Beach Bash itself. Some see "the $40,000 as'a wayfor Mervyn's to support noteworthy causes.: Others seeit as buyin the city's good will r, Yt 3 g`'4jc Parks '.and Recreation --Commissioner =Howard :(Please: turn to Page 4) .... 1 Beach B sh Continued roni e r f ) Fishman considers Mervyn's $40,000 dona- tion a way for it to display its gratitude to the city in allowing it to hold the Beach Bash. Fishman understands that the com- pany would like to be a model neighbor while it occupies the beach in June. "The $40,000 donation proposed to the city is certainly an opportunity for Mer- vyn's to promote and create community good will," he explained "It's not uncom- mon for major corporations to provide grants and funds to cities and schools for that purpose. Mervyn's certainly wants to create publicity and in return this generates business for it. They are up front about their donation and their dealings with the city." The Mervyn's Beach Bash is scheduled for June 7 through June 9 where organizers will occupy the beach for 13 days. The three- day event will highlight extreme sports such as skateboarding, in-line skating and BMX bicycling, and a professional volleyball tour- nament with stadium seating. The $40,000 donation will most likely be used -for various youth programs coordi- nated by the city's Community Resources Department along with the projects and events sponsored by city commissions. Last year, Mervyn's paid the city ap- proximately $86,000 to hold the event, $46,000 of which went to the city for event fees (approximately $18,000 of this amount went to overhead costs). The remaining $40,000 served as a donation that' went to the city's skate park, a teen program and a• city picnic sponsored by the Parks and Recreation Commission. It was the Parks and Recreation Commission which recom- mended approval of the Beach Bash to the City Council. Both Mayor Kathy Dunbabin and Coun- cilman Michael Keegan voiced their oppo- sition to the event this year, although the council eventually green -lighted the event. They contended that the Beach Bash gener- ates an inordinate amount of traffic and con- gestion in the city, and reduces available parking on neighborhood streets. Keegan said that the donation was not a factor when casting his vote. "I do think the donation bought the city's good will," said Keegan. "But it didn't buy my vote and I don't think any amount of money would do it for me. To me, it's not about the money, it's about the quality of life." Due to concerns about the amount of time the Beach Bash occupies the beach be- fore and after the event, the council this year reduced the time allowed for setup and tear -down from 17 to 13 days. IMG is scal- ing back the event by eliminating live enter; . tainment - the Contour Park. the Levi's` semitruck parked next to the city's pier plaza, and all of the rtising booths and displays located soul the pier. Organi- zers will begin setting up the event May 31 and have promised to vacate the beach by June 13. This year, the city's Public Works Com- mission has proposed a new program re- lated to IMG and the Beach Bash. The com- mission has proposed a safety program which would allow Mervyn's to display banners promoting the company on one side while reminding children and adults to bike, skate, walk and drive safely on the other. The commission suggested that the city could hang these Mervyn's signs during the summer months along Hermosa Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway at no cost to the city. Fishman said that such a program could benefit many Hermosa Beach families and children. "About $10,000 each could be allocated to the city's skateboard park, the teen center climbing wall, the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation and a community picnic," he said. "Clearly, this money is going toward city activities and educational causes that benefit a considerable segment- of egmentof residents." During their March meeting, Coun- cilmen Art Yoon, J.R. Reviczky and Sam Edgerton all expressed their support for the Beach Bash. . Yoon said he really can't say whether Mervyn's and IMG are trying to buy their Way into the,city. However, he considers the donation to be an investment in a city that hosts" an event which he - feels promotes beach life. - "Maybe Mervyn's is trying to buy some friends in Hermosa Beach, I really can't say one way or another. If that is its intent, it will. not hold water with me," said Yoon. "I'm glad they are investing in the city but it has no effect on my vote. I didn't vote for the Beach Bash because I wanted to see a . $40,000 donation go to the city. If I think the event is still too successful after this year, then I will have no problem in voting against it next year." Keegan said that prior to getting a seat on the council last November, he was a big supporter of the Beach Bash. He said that during his campaign, however, he met a large number of Hermosa Beach voters who wanted this event eliminated. Aside from his dissenting vote, Keegan won't sponsor this year's event through his business as he has done in previous years. "I think the commission's safety pro- gram is a good thing considering the coun- cil: has already approved the event," added Keegan. "Maybe Mervyn's is thinking, the more money the better, and I can only spec- ulate that they are trying tobuild additional good .-ill for next year."_ Herma (2Iassic The third annual Endless Summer Classic Car Show took place April 27 on the pier plaza in Hermosa Beach. The show featured numerous cars from the golden age of car design. Hermosa Beach This 1940 Packard One Twenty is owned by Bill Roberts. John Trelchel stands in front of his 1957 Corvette. (photos by Phyllis Gamm) . About Town ,Summery classic The third , annual "Endless Summer"" Classic Car Show takes place 10:a:rn to'3 p.m. Saturday,- April 27 on the Pier Plaza, featur- ing entriesfrom: the car club I Great Autos -of Yesteryear:' More than -40 classic convert- ibles and. surf, wagons were expected. For :information call ( 323) 290-3639. .- Hermosa classic car This 1960 Lincoln Continental Mark V convert- ible was also fea- tured at the car show. ow April 27 The -third annual Endless Summer Classic Car Show will be held Saturday, April 27, from 10,a.m.jto 3 p.m. on the pier plaza in Hermosa Beach. The show is sponsored by the city of Hermosa Beach and Great Autos -of YesterYear, and will feature cars from many eras. Advance registration for classic cars is required.. Admission is free. For more informa- tion, call (323)290-3639. Report nty lead to a beer HistoricaTSociety museum by Whitney Youngs After about three months of waiting, the Hermosa Beach Historical Society Board of Directors recently received a comprehen- sive analysis of its museum from a consul- tant who visited the facility in January. Board members say they are now studying the recommendations in the hope of im- proving the museum's ability to serve the serve of $23,000, the Hermosa Beach Historical Society is a nonprofit organiza- tion aimed at acquiring, preserving and in- terpreting historical artifacts specific to the city of Hermosa Beach. One of Moore's first suggestions high- lighted in her report was to revise the group's mission statement. Moore also thought the organization should enlist the expertise of a strategic planning consultant by using a small por- tion of the society's fi- nancial reserves. "It is possible that a current member, may have that background and would be willing to volunteer his or. her services or provide them for a small sti- pend," she wrote. John Heyning, who is a Hermosa Beach resident and the deputy director of resources .' and collection and the curator of mammals for the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, has shown an interest in providing the society with his expertise iri,`;> the area of strategic planning. "The report has provided a nice blueprint; for the Historical Society lo move forward on changes it wants to implement,": Heyning. "The future looks bright fors; them." Moore also suggested that the society:: create more -exposure for the museum'by- exhibiting • historic photographs at public.: places like banks. She also recommended.`..` hiring a consultant to address the museum's :..: physical structural limitations and provide exhibit designs that best highlight the co)lections. Moore also proposed that the society im- plement a volunteer training program` for. the members who donate their time to the museum during its operation hours and pro-:.. vide visitors with an official brochure..:. "When I stepped into the museum,=it took me several minutes to realize that I was in the museum itself, not a storage space," wrote Moore. - "There is no logical flow or direction -for viewing the exhibits, and the organization and arrangement of exhibits seem random - and chaotic. As a peer reviewer, I find this area difficult to address in an objective (Please turn to next page) `The sac etyand: its bo rd of directors' have a greaiWeat ofWitthusiasm to ema -brave the ele,n"ents3:of f ie report novel, hrxt ; he game:thee; same reat tchae kes are oing - °manths =Iiaaardshman Li�II "COS1i3I1; community. In January, Edra Moore visited Hermosa Beach's museum to analyze how its- mis- sion, collections and administration could be improved. In her final report, Moore pro- vided dozens of suggestions. Moore's visit was funded by a $1,775 grant from the national Museum Assess- ment Program. "I know that the board members are going to review the number of issues con- tained in the report during this month's meeting," said Hermosa Beach Parks and Recreation Commissioner Howard Fish- man, who prepared the grant on behalf of the society. "The society and its board of directors have a great deal of enthusiasm to embrace the elements of the report now that the game plan is laid out for them. I think some great changes are going to start to take place in the next few months." Moore, from Lancaster, Calif., earned her master's degree in anthropology from California State University Hayward. She now works as a .museum curator at the Antelope Valley Indian Museum, specializ- ing in artifact preservation and cataloging along with coordinating exhibit exchange programs with other museums. Founded in 1987, with a current mem- bership of 150 members and a budget re- -wry. e- • Historical Socidity (Continued from previous page) manner because the society possesses in- credible interpretative potential in terms of not only materials but of human re- sources as well." With regard to collection stewardship, Moore contended the society's current policies on artifact acquisition were too flexible, which she felt could cause dis- agreements over what items the organi- zation should accept or reject. Moore also said that the museum space = formerly a locker room — ad- versely affects the collection process be- cause some of the ceramic tile walls limit the potential exhibit space. The 1,200 - square -foot museum — comprising ex- hibit, storage and administrative space Aloha Days — currently houses an estimated 1,000 photographs and 200 items. Lastly, Moore advised the society to create detailed job descriptions of volun- teers, members and the curator along with an expansive ethics policy. Many of Moore's recommendations involve improving the museum facility itself, something the society is already in the process of doing. Historical Society Vice President Rick Koenig, for instance, has agreed to head an effort to seek the approval of the city for more museum space and the possible remodel of exist- ing spaces. - "This report is'veryinclusive and very well-done," Koenig said "Edra has done by Whitney Youngs The Hermosa BeachCity�`- Council Tuesday -night; unanr `� -snously agreed to allow organizers' k to ;host the annual Aloha Days_ event scheduled for early August in the downtown: ` - The two-day surfing contest and Hawaiian festival on the city's beach and downtown pier plaza will begin Aug. .10 and end Aug. 11. The city may possibly;) host yet another Navy portcall during this same weekend. Now in its sixth year, the event is organized by Abel Ybarra and is aimed at raising money for a surf- ..-1 ing museum. This year, Ybarra has said he will donate all of the event (Please turn to Page 10) a wonderful job with her recom- dations and analysis. I hope to really go over the report in depth during our: next meeting." Last year, the city formed a subcom- mittee aimed at possibly combining the Historical Museum with proposed surf- ing and jazz collections. Koenig's efforts_ to increase the size of the museum could help make that a reality. Furthermore, Aloha Days organizer Abel Ybarra recently joined the group as a director, and hopes to incorporate his surf- ing collection into the Historical Museum. Ybarra, who has organized the two- day surfing contest and festival to raise money for a new surfing museum, has agreed to donate a portion of the money from the event to the society's budget. The society has also expressed a need in coordinating additional fund-raising events. Aloha Days :(Continued from cover) funds to the Hermosa ;:Beach` Historical Society in the hopes of expanding its din'i"' seum to include.new surfing exhibits Ybarra said he" expects that' about 12,000 >? people will come to Aloha Days this year Several musical groups will perform live,. and the event will also feature Polynesian,:) and Hawaiian dancing, and a beach fash o ; . show featuring merchandise and clothri g _j from local merchants `. The event has' already raised apPro`xi ; mately. $10,000 for the�;possible,construe tion of a new museum in. town and ;Marta expects to raise even more tlus'year According to ' City ;.Councilman Reviczky, the port call is still in the plan ping stages. 1 THEATER review Driving Miss Daisy by Joseph Sirota Driving Miss Daisy, at the Hermosa Beach Playhouse, is about as fine a play with inspired performances and production values as we're likely to find. James Blackman, of the Civic Light Opera of South Bay Cities, quips that this is part of his plan to take over live entertainment in Southern California (or was it the world?), and even skeptics must admit that this is another admirable step forward. Director Michael Michetti, producer Steven Ullman, and a terrific cast of three (Marcia Rodd, Lance E. Nichols and Time Winters) combine to make this Miss Daisy a woman and theatrical event worth reckoning with. Driving Miss Daisy is a skillfully constructed play in terms of conveying universal portraits of the human condition. At the same time, it brings audiences equally impressive servings of charming, laughter -laden interchanges. Playwright Alfred Uhry won a Pulitzer Prize for it in 1988, and in 1989 his adapted screen- play powered the film version, which starred the brilliant Jessica Tandy, Morgan Freeman Theater <i53 and Dan Akroyd, to an Oscar for Best Picture. Uhry's other widely hailed play, Last Night at Ballyhoo, also garnered many drama critics awards and is a perennially popular produc- tion'. Alhough both Miss Daisy and Ballyhoo center on Jewish families living in the South about half a century ago, Uhry reaches out for and achieves greater universality, 'exploring the issues and heart of all minorities or strug- gling groups, trying to survive, prosper, and fit-iri, while still retaining their cultural roots. Although punctuated with laughter, the story line is heartfelt and touching. Widow Daisy Werthan, 72, is the aging matriarch of her Atlanta Georgia family, a hardworking middleclass family that's risen from humble beginnings via three generations of hard work, building up a'successful printing busi- n.:ce naic'.'e motor'ckillc are now fading as >54 we learn from the opening family hubbub over her wrecking her new 1948 Packard, by lapsing into reverse gear. Concerned son Boolie counsels his still strong-willed, self determined _mother that enough is enough, and it's time for a driver to get her around safely (the community's safety as well as hers, as she's also taken out a two -car garage, tool - shed, and row of bushes in her wake). 'Rouble is, the fiercely independent Daisy doesn't want to recognize the encroaching limitations' and frailty of aging, and even less wants to have another 'stranger" in her house. Complicating matters, this stranger is also a "colored" man, and although Daisy's cook/housekeeper of many years is a black woman who's long been a close part of Daisy's daily life, Daisy seems more than a bit uneasy with a man of color there in her house, interrupting her privacy daily. Reluctantly, Daisy puts up with son Boolie's hiring Hoke, . a warm, wise, black man of inner strength and lots of driving experience, offers to chauffer or help her in any way. Uhry paints, through a series of vignettes, the agonizing (but very funny) baby steps in the acceptance journey between Daisy and Hoke. This lifelong passage begins with a five minute reluctant drive to the local Piggly- Wiggly and extends to 25 ensuing years of blossoming, deepening friendship and warm interdependence between these two 'strangers' of different gender, race, religion, and cultural background. Along the way Miss Daisy, a retired schoolteacher, teaches Hoke to read and write (succeeding, despite beginning in. his "50s), while _ Hoke, in turn, becomes Daisy's indispensable lifeline and,in even her own cantankerous words, "my best friend." Along this nostalgic personal path we see reflected the socio-political changes of the times, chipping away at stubborn societal bar- riers. Time Winters is warmly wise, patient and comically frustrated in his delightful portrayal of well-intentioned, ' put-upon son, Boolie. T,anre F. Nichols is outstanding as Hoke an ever winning blend of flexibility and giving, balanced by maintaining an unfailing sense of inner dignity and strength of character. As the title player, Marcia Rodd is sheer magic, bringing into focus the dichotomy of the feisty Matron, so tough and independent on the out- side, yet so fragile, vulnerable, and frightened within. It's a great performance. Set design by Larry Sousa is inventive and effective, with a myriad sliding on and off stage set pieces that create the effect of over a dozen individual settings plus the inevitable passage of time: Raun Yankovich's lighting, John Feinstein's sound work, and Deanne Johnson's makeup and wigs all contribute to the success of this richly satisfying produc- tion. Driving Miss Daisy will be performed through Sunday at the Hermosa Beach Playhouse, on the corner of Pier Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway in Hermosa Beach. Show times, tonight through Saturday at 8 p.m., and Sunday at 2 and 7 p.m. Tickets, $35 in advance and $40 at the door. 372-4477. ER The Pier Avenue 2nd Story Theatre 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, California Presents ' • The bgt sister acter . . best show for everyone Prom 9 to II everyone loves., .*Z , .,... NOW PLAYING! EVERY FRIDAY THRU SUNDAY NEW PERFORMANCES ADDED WEEKLY • FRI. 8 P.M. $35 SAT. 8 P.M. $35 SUNDAY 2 P.m. $35 CALL NOW! (310) 372-4477 ORDER ON THE WEB ' 'i.. f'iviiiv.hermosabea'chi.17!!?use.com. • PACCOAST HIGHWAY • •••,-. • •• . „ 1 ...: _ fc • '.!. 7nd StoryTheatre • . , .. N -7-5 ri Our new Intimate theatre . • sv ; located down the hall from The Remise Beech Playhouse. Report to Rootn 71 - - - VICKI QUADE MARIPAT DONOVAN "The longest running,' comedy in the history.. of Los Angeles." losangtlrg Canes • 1111'lizie Nite Catechism!: The Pier Ave. 2nd Story Theatre presents 'Late Nite Catechism' in an open-ended run Thurs- days through Saturdays at 8 p.m. and Sundays at 2 p.m. The theater is located at -710 Pier Ave. in Hermosa Beach. Tickets are $35 and may be purchased by calling 372-4477. Hermosa Beach Playhouse : S.W. corner of Pier Ave. and Pacific Coast Hwy., Hermosa Beach. 372-4477. • Late Nite Catechism is being performed at 8 p.m. from Thursday through Saturday, and at 2 p.m. on Sunday in The Pier Avenue 2nd Story Theatre. Weekly until surnmerAickets,':, $35 , Driving Miss Daisy, with an -unlikely: alliance at its core, is in previews bfiens tomorrow. Through May 5. The Pier Avenue 2nd StoryTheatre 710 Picr Avenue Hermosa Beach, California "The longest running comedy in the history of Los Angeles." 3Cog 21ngt t8 Tuna eVUIOWNW! AUIWATOONOVAN NOW PLAYING! FRI RPM • SAT RPM • SUN 2PM $35 CALL NOW FOR TICKETS (310) 372-4477 www.hermosabeaehplayhouae.com . '.,. BRING YOUR FRIENDS & FAMILY BACK.... EVERY SHOW IS DIFFERENT! BECAUSE LAUGHTER IS GOOD FOR YOUR SOUL!! .The Pier Avenue 2nd StoryTheatre 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, California "The longest running NOWA SUNNG comedy in the history CALL NOW FOR TICKETS of Los Angeles." (310) 372-4477; 1.08 nQflt8 �tm2Pi www. hermosabeachplayhouse.00m'- Palm Springs bus trip April 14 The city of Hermosa Beach is organiz- ing a bus trip for seniors to the Palm Springs Follies for Saturday, April 14, from 9:30 a.m. to 7 p.m. The cost is $45 for Hermosa residents and $48 for nonresidents, which -includes admission and bus transportation. The registration deadline is Thursday, April 4. Register at. the Community Center, 710 Pier Ave.; or call 318-0265 for more information. ':'',- ..-.'..,,.?'''.;.,:'',..'•':.',.h..,'.i.:'l.:,'.e,' 4Y:9f.: ...He;..--.1".'.17('2,'''a"Be.•.,....,.:,;,a'i..,c!..r.:-:,!,-:,!'':.' ::, !'' .,'11. w-a':.',...1.,k ing'rPgTtiipsf9ii149;i17sPri..4:.1reaK4Yic4951hicl4111take-place1;fHIAiiil1tirlg10:4e; SPrii4tbr:k::y';M3'is'forc::::6eCAee1t"ege1:9ga::1:.a:‘;1ir offeiuch'a::1y;§:.anes,'spor;;l75 andcrafts, da14o)cu1sjo, ca—pw111)e'frOm30 ato :;,Fe#19saj4ppy,?41k44eapst is$80iforresid7ts:1c$907fOrcnOnrqidents ,Ae9n7c4mpforchIldre&betWeepthei,' .ages Of11aic14"Willa1Sobe offered:;;. .,, • ',,,,, ..... Registrationfor the'camps•is'ongoing at -- the Community Center, 710 Pier Ave: For more information, ' -call 318-0247. • • ' Beach co-ed flag football k.blind draw ..co-ed ,flag football tournament is ,being. held Saturday, April 20 at10thiStreet -and.the Strand in Hermosa teach'. Individuals: are.. welcome ind,nO".exPerience'iS4ce'SL- teams.will be picked at ran 'dom andeach team.will:play a rninV" mum a two gaings:',I.RegistratiOn- and check-in is from 9-9:30 a.m. Games will begin ' promptly :at Tournapent'cost is $15:per person if pre registered and $20 the day of the tournament. To -ensUre:.'even::tearciN:::, sin up with an opposite.seico-entry Registration forms are at the Hermosa. Beach ,Community ,Center, 710 Ave. 2144538. `ER • • ne tournament The city of'Hermosa Beach is accepting teams for an over-the-linersoftball'iourna- ment;'SatUrday,-MaY4, at Hermosa Beach pier The entry fee is $50 per team and each team is guaranteed to play at least three games There are :men's coed and high school divisions' with play beginning at 9 a.m: The entry deadline is 'four days'be- fore the•event::' ' • , For more information, call the city at 318-0280 or Russ Johnson at (562) 866- ermosa 1 . over -the -line tournament _Thecifyofliertno§a Beach is accept- '1.ing.'tearns for "an over-the-Iine softball tournament,. Sunday, April 14, at the ("..11ermosa'Beachpier. The entry fee is $50 per team and each (,..teamis guaranteed to play at least three games. There are -men's, coed and high school divisions with play beginning at ( 9 a.m.".The entry deadline is four days be- fore the event. For more information, call the city at ( 318-0280 or Russ Johnson at (562) j 866-8685. • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, APRIL 2002 May 20, 2002 City Council Meeting of May 28, 2002 STATISTICAL SECTION Finance Administration (ed'ouarter-Report) 3rd Quarter) ret tNvotogstAccotINTs :St 34 684 570 RECEIVABLE 1,560 1,161 20,279 18,586 TRANSACTIONS CHECKS iSSUED . . . . . ....... DISCOUNTS TAKEN $135.05 $211.23 $2,814.53 $2,151.81 . 347 244 3,262 3,175 211 146 1,689 1,566 LANDSCAPE/ST. UGHT REBATES (2001 Tax Yr.) • • T EXEMPTIONS .ODATE (3) 1,336 (4) 1,281 • AYROLL Full Time Employees 135 132 Part Time Employees 44 61 1 f:/b95/open/fmactivityTOT.doc • Finance Cashier ENTS E California 1,175 1,489 Out of State 150 329 409 9,09 30,1 3 SM 15,451 1,933 14,967 2,314 17,81': E... 2,487 ;2,36'1 X34 954: X26,207':: Driveway Guest Party Passes Contractor Daily nnuai PreIerentia Transferable 265 227 318 31.2. 2 227 27 1 2 232 29 3 Vehicle...:.::: M A<.BU VOUCHERS MAL LICENSES.....:: 2...:: :::..... 1i SII ESS LICENSES . . Licenses Issued ::.. Revenue 17 3,238 283 39 20 3,035 222 13 3,914 3,554 4,556 ......................................4,;6:7::9: 210 223 2,315 6 71. $7 $ 9.61 2,209 NOTED: Stephen R. Bq/e City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted: Viki Copeland, Finance Director f:\b95\open/finactivityNO V 99. doc t •� HERASA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2002 APRIL ,_ ;r.9 �. ... -. .' ., .t _L:FIRE;STATISTICSL_ T:a ,, -_,..._,1 , , .— ' . .rti_ ,._...,... _ THIS MO. THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION FOR EMS MO. LAST F/Y DATE ORIGINAL INSPECTION MO. DATE TO DATE RES. COMMERCIAL 69 78 147 130 ASSEMBLY 0 0 1 0 INSTITUTIONS 0 1 0 1 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 1 21 APARTMENTS 9 5 46 34 RE -INSPECTION COMMERCIAL 15 23 41 39 ASSEMBLY 0 0 1 0 INSTITUTIONS 0 0 2 0 INDUSTRIAL 5 2 10 2 APARTMENTS 10 5 22 21 OCCUPANCY LOAD 0 3 22 21 CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 2 1 AMBULANCE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 APRIL INV BILL THIS THIS MO. F/Y TO LAST F/Y THIS F/Y TO LAST F/Y FOR EMS MO. LAST F/Y DATE TO DATE MO. DATE TO DATE RES. 21 22 268 225 $5,334 $67,818 $63,150 NON -RES. 22 12 145 152 $11,154 $82,641 $79,532 TOTALS 43 34 413 377 $16,488 $150,459 $142,682 Respectfully Submitted: '4ht tr\./4-A 1 RUSSELL TINGLEY, FIRE CHIEF Noted: STEVE' : 17 L, , TY MANAGER HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 1 05/15/2002 • INCIDENT RECAP Dates: 04/01/2002 to 04/30/2002, Incidents: All Description Number Average Loss Value Response All 118 3.68 Fires 6 4.33 1,700 Structure Fires 3 4.00 Medical Emergencies (with patients) 78 2.78 Other (includes mutual aid) 34 5.87 NOTES: 1. Since incidents can be coded with multiple situations found, an incident may be counted more than once. 2. Average response time calculations exclude cancelled calls. HERMOSA HBEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 1 05/15/2002 • • INCIDENT RECAP Dates: 01/01/2002 to 04/30/2002, Incidents: All Description Number Average Loss Value Response All 529 3.69 Fires 17 3.71 530,630 Structure Fires 8 .3.63 528,700 Medical Emergencies (with patients) 304 2.92 Hazardous Materials 2 4.00 Other (includes mutual aid) 206 5.01 NOTES: 1. Since incidents can be coded with multiple situations found, an incident may be counted more than once. 2. Average response time calculations 'exclude cancelled calls. HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 1 05/15/2002 • • RECAP OF PRIMARY SITUATION FOUND All Incidents Dates: 04/01/2002 to 04/30/2002, Incidents: All Code Number Percent Description 1 10 1 0.85 FIRE UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 11 4 3..39 STRUCTURE FIRE 14 1 0.85 VEHICLE FIRE 16 1 0.85 REFUSE FIRE OUTSIDE 7 5.94 3 31 3 2.54 EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSIST 32 77 65.25 EMERGENCY MEDICAL CALL 39 1 0.85 RESCUE, EMS NOT CLASSIFIED 81 68.64 4 44 2 1.69 ELECTRICAL ARCING, SHORTED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 49 1 0.85 HAZARDOUS CONDITION NOT CLASSIFIED 3 2.54 5 51 1 0.85 PERSON IN DISTRESS 52 3 2.54 WATER PROBLEM 53 3 2.54 SMOKE, ODOR PROBLEM 55 2 1.69 PUBLIC SERVICE ASSISTANCE 57 1 0.85 COVER ASSIGNMENT, STANDBY AT FIRE STATION, MOVE -UP 59 1 0.85 SERVICE CALL NOT CLASSIFIED 11 9.32 6 60 1 0.85 GOOD INTENT CALL UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 61 4 3.39 INCIDENT CLEARED PRIOR TO ARRIVAL 66 1 0.85 EMS CALL, TRANSPORTED/LEFT SCENE PRIOR TO ARRIVAL 69 1 0.85 GOOD INTENT CALL NOT CLASSIFIED 7 5.94 7 70 1 0.85 FALSE CALL UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 73 5 4.24 SYSTEM MALFUNCTION 74 2 1.69 UNINTENTIONAL 8 6.78 9 99 1 0.85 NOT CLASSIFIED 1 0.85 118 100.01 HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 1 • • 05/15/2002 RECAP OF PRIMARY SITUATION FOUND All Incidents Dates: 01/01/2002 to 04/30/2002, Incidents: All Code Number Percent Description 1 10 1 0.19 FIRE UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 11 13 2.46 STRUCTURE FIRE 14 2 0.38 VEHICLE FIRE 16 3 0.57 REFUSE FIRE OUTSIDE 17 1 0.19 OTHER OUTSIDE FIRE 19 2 0.38 FIRE NOT CLASSIFIED 22 4.17 3 31 8 1.51 EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSIST 32 320 60.49. EMERGENCY MEDICAL CALL 33 1 0.19 LOCK -IN 35 2 0.38 PEOPLE TRAPPED, CAUGHT, BURIED 39 2 0.38 RESCUE, EMS NOT CLASSIFIED 333 62.95 4 40 2 0.38 HAZARDOUS CONDITION UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 41 2 0.38 FLAMMABLE GAS OR LIQUID CONDITION 44 9 1.70 ELECTRICAL ARCING, SHORTED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 46 6 1.13 VEHICLE ACCIDENT, POTENTIAL ACCIDENT 49 8 1.51 HAZARDOUS CONDITION NOT CLASSIFIED 27 5.10 5 50 1 0.19 SERVICE CALL UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 51 5 0.95 PERSON IN DISTRESS 52 16 3.02 WATER PROBLEM 53 19 3.59 SMOKE, ODOR PROBLEM 55 10 1.89 PUBLIC SERVICE ASSISTANCE 57 2 0.38 COVER ASSIGNMENT, STANDBY AT FIRE STATION, MOVE -UP 59 6 1.13 SERVICE CALL NOT CLASSIFIED 59 11.15 6 60 7 1.32 GOOD INTENT CALL UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 61 29 5.48 INCIDENT CLEARED PRIOR TO ARRIVAL 63 1 0.19 CONTROLLED BURNING 64 1 0.19 VICINITY ALARM 65 2 0.38 STEAM, OTHER GAS MISTAKEN FOR SMOKE 66 1 0.19 EMS CALL, TRANSPORTED/LEFT SCENE PRIOR TO ARRIVAL 67 1 0.19 HAZMAT INVESTIGATION, NO HAZARDOUS CONDITION FOUND 69 7 1.32 GOOD INTENT CALL NOT CLASSIFIED 49 9.26 7 70 3 0.57 FALSE CALL UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 73 17 3.21 SYSTEM MALFUNCTION 74 13 2.46 UNINTENTIONAL 79 2 0.38 FALSE CALL NOT CLASSIFIED 35 6.62 9 91 1 0.19 CITIZENS COMPLAINT 99 3 0.57 NOT CLASSIFIED 4 0.76 529 100.01 HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 1 • 05/15/2002 411 DAY OF WEEK/DISPATCH TIME RECAP All Incidents Dates: 04/01/2002 to 04/3Q/2002, Incidents: All Time Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Total 0000 2 2 1 1 1 1 8 0100 1 1 1 3 2 8 0200 1 1 1 3 0300 1 1 1 3 0500 1 1 0600 1 1 0700 1 1 2 0800 2 1 1 1 5 0900 1 1 1 1 4 1000 1 1 1100 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 10 1200 1 2 2 1 2 8 1300 2 1 1 4 1400 1 1 2 1 1 6 1500 1 2 2 5 1600 1 1 1 1 4 1700 2 1 1 2 1 1 8 1800 3 3 2 1 1 10 1900 2 2 2 2 8 2000 1 1 1 3 2100 1 1 2 2200 2 1 1 4 8 2300 1 1 1 1 2 6 18 19 17 19 12 15 18 118 HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 1 05/15/2002 • • DAY OF WEEK/DISPATCH TIME RECAP All Incidents Dates: 01/01/2002 to 04/30/2002, Incidents: All Time Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Total 0000 4 3 4 1 4 1 6 23 0100 8 2 3 3 3 4 6 29 0200 2 2 4 1 2 3 14 0300 2 2 1 1 2 2 10 0400 3 1 3 1 8 0500 2 1 3 5 1 12 0600 4 3 3 1 3 4 2 20 0700 3 4 1 4 1 1 14 0800 5 1 2 3 3 14 0900 1 4 2 1 2 6 3 19 1000 2 6 4 2 2 4 3 23 1100 6 5 3 5 4 6 6 35 1200 3 7 4 2 5 1 8 30 1300 4 6 2 6 4 6 4 32 1400 3 8 5 2 5 2 4 29 1500 6 3 7 7 4 1 3 31 1600 3 3 9 5 3 3 4 30 1700 4 4 4 3 2 5 2 24 1800 5 5 2 1 5 6 6 30 1900 6 4 5 1 1 2 7 26 2000 3 4 2 4 4 1 18 2100 6 2 1 4 4 2 1 20 2200 2 3 2 1 5 6 19 2300 4 1 1 1 7 5 19 88 80 77 62 61 77 84 529 • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 8, 2002 Regular Meeting of May 28, 2002 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT — APRIL 2002 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration. function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; this includes engineering and management of Capital Improvements Projects. PLAN CHECKS STAFF HOURS PERMITS CURRENT PREVIOUS YEAR TO MONTH DATE STREET PARCEL SEWER SEWER STREET BANNERS DUMPSTER/ UTIL. BUILDING ENCR./C.U.P. PLANS MAP LATERAL DEMO. EXCAV. MISC. CO. DEPT. ETC. 82 CUTS CURRENT 10 1 2 2 6 2 12 26 0 2 MONTH Projects 27 60 607 Meetings - Other Public Agencies 9 ' 2 63 NPDES Investigations 0 YEAR TO 26 1 24 22 69 26 136 115 0 31 DATE NON-CIP PROJECTS STAFF HOURS DESCRIPTION CURRENT PREVIOUS YEAR TO MONTH DATE Field Investigations 2 15 201 Inspections 70 82 1008 NPDES Permit/City Storm Water Management Program 7 10 116 General Office Engineering 96 43 382 Grant Applications 0 0 7 Projects 27 60 607 Meetings - Other Public Agencies 9 ' 2 63 NPDES Investigations 0 5 80 TOTAL HOURS 211 217 2464 ENGINEERING •The Capital Improvement Projects currently in progress or completed are: COMPLETED PROJECT NO. 00 - 139 01 - 168 00 - 171 97 - 182 99 - 306 TITLE Hermosa Ave./Manhattan Ave., 16th St. to 26th St. Manhattan Avenue, 27th St. to Boundary Ardmore between 1S` to Gould Myrtle Ave. Undergrounding Catch Basin Inserts TOTAL COMPLETED COST 360,000 430,000 323,500 1,315,660 21,918 2,451,078 UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 01 - 166 97 - 183 00 - 191 01 - 531 01 - 532 95 - 622 01 - 628 TITLE Slurry & Crack Sealing, east of PCH Loma Dr. Undergrounding 14th St. Landscape Planters 3rd Street Park South Park Roller Hockey Rink Improvements City Hall Remodel, ADA Upgrade Community Center Courtyard TOTAL UNDER CONSTRUCTION EST. COST 120,600 1,307,457 25,000 70,000 135,000 1,595,446 140,000 3,393,503 OUT TO BID PROJECT NO. 00 - 172 95 - 507 01 - 628 TITLE 21St Street Improvements Valley to Power Valley Park Improvements Community Center Painting TOTAL OUT TO BID EST. COST 221,682 2,095,200 151,120 2,468,002 UNDER DESIGN PROJECT NO. 01 - 159 00 - 192 99 - 305 00 - 410 00 - 411 00 - 412 00 - 413 00 - 414 99 - 610 00 - 630 TITLE Hillcrest & Rhodes, 18th to 21st Loma Area Street Improvements Installation of CDS Units CANCELLED Loma Area Sewer Improvements Sewer Rehab — Target Area 1 Sewer Rehab — Target Area 2 Sewer Rehab — Target Area 3 Sewer Rehab — Target Area 4 Fire Station Upstairs Remodel & Additions Pier Renovation, Phase III TOTAL UNDER DESIGN EST. COST 368,406 1,000,000 0 600,000 908,900 800,900 1,048,000 644,100 432,810 1,500,000 7,303,116 TO BE DESIGNED PROJECT NO. 00 - 140 01 - 154 01 - 164 01 - 167 99 - 409 99 - 529 TITLE 11th St. On Street Parking Improvements 15th Street between Hermosa Ave. & Beach Drive Various Street Improvements #2 Various Concrete Pavement Repairs Manhole Repair/Reconstruction Clark Field Improvements TOTAL TO BE DESIGNED EST. COST 210,000 20,000 1,597,000 100,000 150,000 357,100 2,434,100 2 • MAINTENANCE . The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: • Building Maintenance ♦ Sewers/Storm Drains • Equipment Service • Street Lighting • Parks/Medians • Street Maintenance/Traffic Safety Building Maintenance: Changed marquee, repaired doors at Community Center, repaired lights at Community Center; repaired doors at Base III; repaired floor at Community Center; removed graffiti from Clark Field buildings; repaired beach restrooms — doors and plumbing; repaired vandalism at the Community Center. Equipment Service Division: Ongoing vehicle and equipment maintenance. Parks/Medians Division: Irrigation repaired at Noble Park; ongoing median maintenance, repaired drinking fountain at Greenwood Park; repaired South Park equipment; installed new median plants; removed overhead wires at the Community Center; installed Clark Field restroom partitions. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Started emergency repairs at 25'h and Ozone and Bard; checked pump stations; repaired plumbing in beach restrooms; repaired plumbing in jail cells; inventoried all lighting citywide; repaired plumbing at Community Center; removed graffiti. Street Lighting Division: Put up and took down banners; assisted with Loma Underground project; constructed stands for ceremony; repaired lights in parking lot C; repaired street lights citywide; removed wires from Community Center roof; repaired lights in Police Department offices; re-bulbed all City traffic signals. Street Maintenance/Traffic Safety Division: Repaired stop signs at the south end of Hermosa Avenue; repaired potholes citywide; ground sidewalks; repaired street signs; repaired Cypress encroachment; rebuilt yard pole storage; painted mechanic's building; marked new equipment; took confined space training; painted red curbs; repaired bollards; removed graffiti. Graffiti Removal: FY 01-02 FY 00-01 MONTH HOURS MONTH HOURS JULY 46.0 JULY 37.5 AUGUST 31.0 AUGUST 21.5 SEPTEMBER 19.0 SEPTEMBER 26.0 OCTOBER 42.0 OCTOBER 55.0 NOVEMBER 9.5 NOVEMBER 13.0 DECEMBER 8.0 DECEMBER 38.5 JANUARY 25.0 JANUARY 48.0 FEBRUARY 22.5 FEBRUARY 1.0 MARCH 21.5 MARCH 20.5 APRIL 21.0 APRIL 28.0 MAY MAY 52.0 JUNE JUNE 81.0 TOTALS 245.5 422.0 3 Respectfully submitted: Rhea B. Punneo Administrative Assistant Noted: Stephen :ur City Manager Concur: /aroId C. Williams, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer de ' 4 F:\B95\PWFILES\Activity Reports\Activity Report 01-02 April.doc DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE .AND CONTROL REPORT OF ACTIVITIES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MONTH OF MARCH, 2002 AMOUNT OF SERVICE YEAR TO LAST YEAR SERVICE PROVIDED THIS MONTH DATE TO DATE ` SERVICE REQUEST 0 1 4 FIELDHOURS* 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 DOG IMPOUNDED 2 29 16 CAT IMPOUNDED 1 23 14 OTHER IMPOUNDED 0 8 15 CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 0 PRIVATE VETERINARIAN CARE 0 0 0 OBSERVATION 0 0 0 DEAD ANIMAL 0 1 1 HUMANE INVESTIGATIONS 0 0 0 COURT APPEARANCES (hours) 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 ANIMALS PLACED IN NEW HOMES 2 19 7 ANIMALS RETURNED TO OWNERS 0 6 4 LICENSED SOLD 0 0 0 DOG LICENSE CANVASSING 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 *Includes humane education hours ~ �� �� �� �� DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL REPORT OF ACTIVITIES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MONTH OF APRIL, 2002 AMOUNT OF SERVICE YEAR TO LAST YEAR SERVICE PROVIDED THIS MONTH DATE TO DATE . SERVICE REQUEST 221 1 4 FIELD HOURS* O110:00 00000:00 00000:00 DOG IMPOUNDED 22 31 17 CAT IMPOUNDED 82 25 14 OTHER IMPOUNDED 23 8 15 CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 0 PRIVATE VETERINARIAN CARE 1 0 O OBSERVATION 1 0 0 DEAD ANIMAL 1 1 HUMANE INVESTIGATIONS 0 0 0 COURT APPEARANCES (hours) OOOO:OO OOOOO:OO OOOOO:OO ANIMALS PLACED IN NEW HOMES 25 19 8 ANIMALS RETURNED TO OWNERS 5 6 4 LICENSED SOLD 34 0 0 DOG LICENSE CANVASSING OOOO:OO 00000:00 00000:00 *Includes humane education hours • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION APRIL, 2002 MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT NUMBER OF PERMITS TYPE OF.ACTIVIT CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FrEli.; 'FY TO DATE `> BUILDING 55 44 528 482 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 25 37 314 355 ELECTRIC 22 35 232 269 PLAN CHECK 26 18 192 221 SEWER USE 3 0 10 28 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 48 24 323 288 PARKS & RECREATION 1 0 2 2 IN LIEU PARKS & REC 4 0 17 33 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 0 SIGN REVIEW 2 1 15 16 FIRE FLOW FEES 10 5 53 92 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 1 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 0 7 14 13 TOTALS 196 171 FEES COLLECTED 1,700 1,800 TYPE OF .....: .. ..... ......:.....::.......::...::...............::..........:::..... FEE ... CURRENT ; _ MONTH THIS MONTHLAST LAST FY FY TO DATE FY TO DATE BUILDING $32,078.12 $17,342.22 $207,355.83 $303,075.58 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 2,325 e 3,436 27,061.40 36,083 ELECTRIC 3,466 6,375 43,103.60 56,741 PLAN CHECK 25,161.80 12,128.40 130,506.10 228,088.45 SEWER USE 1,586.56 0 5,145.21 27,355.06 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 2,352 1,128 15,689 13,473.20 PARKS & RECREATION 3,500 0 7,000 7,000 IN LIEU PARKS & REC. 13,792 0 66,950 219,182 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 0 SIGN REVIEW 200 96 1,492 1,527 FIRE FLOW FEES 11,669 5,107.50 51,699 120,910.50 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 1,194 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 0 252 512 467 TOTALS $96,130.48 1 $45,865.12 $556,514.14 $1,015,096.79 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF APRIL, 2002 TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS DWELLING UNITS. VALUATION 1 101 NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES DETACHED 9 9 $2,385,461.64 2 102 NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES ATTACHED 3 103 NEW TWO FAMILY BUILDINGS 4 104 NEW 3 OR 4 FAMILY BUILDINGS 5 105 NEW 5 OR MORE FAMILY BUILDINGS 6 213 NEW HOTELS/MOTELS 7 214 NEW OTHER NON HOUSEKEEPING 8 318 NEW AMUSEMENT & RECREATION 9 319 NEW CHURCHS/OTHER 10 320 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS 11 321 NEW PARKING GARAGES. 12 322 NEW SERVICE STATIONS/REPAIR GARAGES 13 323 NEW HOSPITALS/OTHER INSTITUTIONAL 14 324 NEW OFFICES/BANKS • 15 325 NEW PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITY BUILDINGS 16 326 NEW SCHOOLS/OTHER EDUCATIONAL 17 327 NEW STORES/OTHER MERCH BLDGS. 18 328 NEW OTHER NON RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS 19 329 NEW STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BUILDING 3 0 $65,520.00 20 434 ADD/ALTER DWELLING/POOLS 33 $564,846.36 21 437 ADD/ALTER NON RESIDENTIAL 3 $162,500.00 22 P 438 RESIDENTIAL GARAGES/CARPORTS 23 645 DEMOLITION -SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES 3 3 $1,500.00 24 646 DEMO 2 -FAMILY BUILDINGS 25 647 DEMO 3-4 FAMILY BUILDINGS 26 648 DEMO 5+ FAMILY BUILDINGS 27 649 DEMO ALL OTHER BUILDINGS TOTAL 54 $3,179,828.00 TOTAL UNITS ADDED FY 2001-02 TO DATE: 45 TOTAL UNITS DEMOLISHED/LOST FY TO DATE: 41 (See Attached List) TOTAL NET UNITS FY TO DATE: 4 FY 1999-00 Total New Dwelling Units: Total Demolished Units: Net Units: FY 2000-01 92 Total New Dwelling Units: 97 Total Demolished Units: -5 Net Units: 2 102 62 40 • Dwelling Units Demolished/Lost as of April, 2002 ADDRESS ; :. . TYPE PERMIT DATE PERMIT No. No OF UNIT 122 2nd St. SFR 7/12/01 B01-310 1 822 6th St. SFR 7/12/01 B01-316 1 2935 Palm Dr. SFR 7/19/01 B01-331 1 600 The Strand SFR 8/14/01 B01-384 1 2115 Hermosa Av. SFR 8/22/01 B01-388 1 1504 Silver St. SFR 8/29/01 B01-409 1 707 Longfellow Av. SFR 8/30/01 B01-415 1 43 20t" St. SFR 9/5/01 B01-421 1 633 21st St. SFR 9/5/01 B01-422 1 1641 Golden Av. SFR 9/10/01 B01-427 1 2341 Hermosa Av. DUPLEX 9/5/01 B01-423 2 40 21St St. SFR 10/16/01 B01-507 1 2804 Hermosa Av. DUPLEX 10/25/01 B01-533 2 300 28th St. SFR 11/20/01 B01-585 1 1831 Hillcrest Dr. SFR 12/17/01 B01-621 1 935 Monterey BI. SFR 12/19/01 B01-631 1 1216 Loma Dr. DUPLEX 1/7/02 B02-003 2 814 Bayview Dr. DUPLEX 1/14/02 B02-020 2 153 Lyndon St. DUPLEX 1/24/02 B02-036 2 106 8 " St. TRIPLEX 1/23/02 B02-032 3 415 Hopkins Ave. SFR 2/4/02 B02-054 1 645 24t St. SFR 2/4/02 B02-056 1 1738 Manhattan Ave. SFR 2/7/02 B02-067 1 1704 Loma Dr. SFR 2/19/02 B02-075 1 30 19th St. CONY. 4 TO 3 UNITS 2/28/02 B02-034 1 644 10th St. SFR 3/21/02 B02-140 1 638 Manhattan Av. DUPLEX 3/11/02 B02-123 2 425 11th St. DUPLEX 3/11/02 B02-131 2 344 31s1 St. CONY. DUPLEX TO SFR 3/21/02 B01-528 1 236 Prospect Av. SFR 4/10/02 B02-182 1 65 17th St. SFR 4/11/02 B02-188 1 652 Porter Ln. SFR 4/18/02 B02-192 1 Total Units Demolished 41 • HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL May 2, 2002 Regular Meeting of May 28, 2002 ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION APRIL, 2002 STAFF REPORT PREPARED •SUBJECT m CHIS MONTM•LASTFV ti4040 0.4 ' 1=x/' '6.... DATE LAS'C:FY To.DATE APPEAL / RECONSIDERATION 1 0 2 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) - CONDOMINIUMS 0 1 8 24 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) - COMMERCIAL 1 0 9 2 C.U.P./PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 3 1 6 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 0 0 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MAP EXTENSION 0 0 4 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 0 0 FINAL MAP 1 0 16 14 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 0 4 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 0 0 0 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 0 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 1 0 11 2 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 0 7 2 PARKING PLAN 0 0 0 1 SPECIAL STUDY 0 0 1 0 SUBDIVISION 0 0 4 0 TEXT AMENDMENT 2 3 9 11 TRANSIT 0 0 0 0 VARIANCE 0 1 2 7 ZONE CHANGE 0 0 0 0 MISCELLANEOUS 3 4 47 59 TOTAL REPORTS PREPARED 12 10 126 140 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP PASSENGERS ` THIS MONTH. OW:Mt** LA .. .. ' FY"To DATE UsI FY To DATE... HERMOSA BEACH 811 787 7,219 8,535 REDONDO BEACH 4,599 4,834 45,575 50,612 SATELLITE 368 334 3,059 3,333 4 CONCUR: Sol Blumenf Community NOTED: Stephen . B City Manager f:\b95\cd\activity Id, Director evelopment Department Respectfully submitted, Administrative Assistant May 22, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 28, 2002 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT April 2002 STATISTICS Workers Comp Claims CURRENT THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY MONTH LAST YEAR DATE TO DATE Claims opened 3 2 27 16 Claims closed 5 1 36 1 Total open 50 50 Current Employee 39 30 Lost time (hours) Safety Fire 0 417 144 6962 2816 Police 417 Non -Safety 178 160 1733 489 Liability Claims Claims opened 3 2 19 20 Claims closed 0 0 21 15 Total open 22 20 Employee -Involved Vehicle Accidents Safety 0 0 0 4 Non -safety 0 0 0 1 Employee Turnover Safety Non -Safety 0 0 0 1 4 2 3 5 Respectfylly submitted, Not (chael A. Earl, Director ersonnel & Risk Management Stephen R. Burrell City Manager HERMOSA BEACH P LICE AND COMMUNITY SERV GES UtI'AK I MtN 15 ONTHY ACTIVITY REPORT F THE CALENDAR YEAR 20 POLICE DEPARTMENT APRIL APRIL YTD YTD 2002 2001 2002 2001 OFFENSES REPORTED MURDER 0 0 0 0 RAPE 1 0 2 3 ROBBERY 4 0 6 2 ASSAULT 7 4 44 36 Burglaries(Vehicle) 6 9 21 18 Burglaries(Residential) 1 4 15 15 Burglaries(Commercial) 0 1 5 3 BURGLARY(Total) 7 14 41 36 LARCENY 29 46 154 142 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 4 4 15 19 DUI 5 17 40 55 ALL OTHER OFFENSES 119 84 369 293 PERSONS ARRESTED ADULTS 59 59 269 221 JUVENILES 0 2 5 15 CRIMINAL CITATIONS 79 36 216 128 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORTS Fatal 0 0 0 0 Injury 4 3 23 9 Property Damage Only 13 15 58 54 TRAFFIC CITATIONS 230 197 822 556 DISTURBANCE CALLS 305 220 1,064 870 POLICE CALLS FOR SERVICE 2,647 2,202 9,781 8,411 Page 1 HERMOSA BEACH POLICE AND COMMUNI I Y StKVIILtumrikm 1 1V1ry 1 0 ONTHY ACTIVITY REPORT Mk THE CALENDAR YEAR 20172 COMMUNITY SERVICES APRIL APRIL YTD YTD 2002 2001 2002 2001 CITATIONS ISSUED 3943 3,249 5,052 12,928 BOOTS 4 I 1 14 3 VEHICLE IMPOUNDS 43 20 170 106 CALLS FOR SERVICE 198 1 161 1 900 1 581 ANIMAL CONTROL CITATIONS ISSUED 1 9 9 35 39 (CALLS FOR SERVICE 1 88 1 65 268 228 ANIMAL PICK UPS 35 28 94 85 OF THESE RETURNED TO OWNER 6 2 29 14 TAKEN TO SHELTER 1 1 9 9 INJURED, TAKEN TO VET 12 3 14 7 DECEASED 14 14 39 41 RETURNED TO WILD 1 4 2 6 ADOPTED 1 4. 1 8 Respecfully Submitted to: City Manager - Steve Burrell By:Chief of Police Michael Lavin Prepared by: Records Administrator - R. Miller Content approved by: Division Commanders Lt. Tom Bohlin Lt. Tom Eckert Page 2 PROPOSAL for ADMINISTRATION of a GENERAL AND AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY CLAIMS PROGRAM for the City of Hermosa Beach Presented By COLEN & LEE, INC 1470 South Valley Vista Drive, Suite 230 Diamond Bar, California 91765 (909) 861-0816; (909) 860-3995 Submitted April 25, 2002 ,2411. COLEN AND LEE 1470 South Valley Vista Drive, Suite 230, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Telephone (909) 861-0816 Risk Management Services April 25, 2002 Michael Earl Director of Personnel and Risk Management 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. Earl: We are pleased to present, to the City of Hermosa Beach, Colen and Lee's Proposal to Provide General and Automobile Liability Claims Administration Services. Colen and Lee is uniquely qualified to provide these services to Hermosa Beach due to a client base that is comprised mainly of public entities. Furthermore, Colen and Lee is the claims administrator for nine cities that are members of ICRMA. As such, we are well acquainted with the memorandum of coverage and litigation management guidelines that must be adhered to. In fact, the undersigned was on the committee that recently updated the memorandum of coverage. Colen and Lee provides quality work at a reasonable fee ($50.00 per open claim per month or $900.00 per month, based upon 18 open claims). When that is coupled with the experience that we have, it is clear that Colen and Lee can be a valuable tool for the City of Hermosa Beach. We look forward to discussing our claims program with you and should you have any . - ion , please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincer ChristopherM' . lard Liability Un' Manager /ny.41486 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 1 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ..................... ............Page 1 CLAIMS HANDLING PHILOSOPHY......... Page 1 COMPANY INFORMATION ............... Page 1 CLIENT REFERENCES...... ............. Page 2 ' GENERAL CLAIMS MANAGEMENT...... Page 2 LITIGATION MANAGEMENT............ Page 3 FEES......... Page 3 STATISTICAL REPORTS .......................................... Page 4 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS... Page 4 RESUMES ............... ATTACHMENT A 1 CLIENT REFERENCES... ATTACHMENT B SAMPLE REPORTS......... ATTACHMENT C CERTIFICATES of INSURANCE ............... ATTACHMENT D 1 1 1 1 1 Minimum Proposal Requirements 1) Knowledge and Experience Colen and Lee is a third party claims administrator that handles liability claims on behalf of our many clients, 93% of which are public entities. As a result of this client base, we are very familiar with the various nuances that are associated with liability filed against public entities. As far as experience is concerned, the average claims handling experience for the members of our liability department is 18+ years. Therefore, we feel that we have the background and experience to assist Hermosa Beach with its liability claims. 2) Experience and Qualification of Assigned Personnel The liability unit of Colen and Lee is comprised of one manager, two administrators and one clerk. We propose that the Liability Unit Manager, Christopher Millard, handle the claims for Hermosa Beach. Please see Attachment A for Mr. Millard's resume. 3) Claims Handling Philosophy We, at Colen and Lee, believe that each administrator be assigned accounts as opposed to claims. In doing so, the administrator builds a rapport with each individual client contact and learns the claims philosophy of those clients. Additionally, the administrators become familiar with the personnel of each individual client, which enables a faster and more efficient claims operation. At Colen and Lee, we strive for an average caseload of 250 files per administrator. We feel that this is the maximum case load that an administrator can handle comfortably and still attend client meetings, settlements, mediations etc. Most of the claim investigations will be performed from our offices in Diamond Bar, Ca. over the phone. However, there are occasions where the administrator will need to perform some outside investigation. With a caseload of 250 claims, we feel that this can be accomplished and still provide excellent service to our clients. 4) Corporate History Colen and Lee was founded on September 1, 1982 by Gary Lee and Bernard Colen. The offices were originally established in West Covina but subsequently moved to Diamond Bar, Ca. 1 Mr. Lee spent two years with an insurance company before moving into the self-insured arena. He then spent five years with a self-insured administrator before he co-founded Colen and Lee. He has been with Colen and Lee for 19 years. Bernard Colen has also been with Colen and Lee for 19 years. Prior to that, he spent five years working for a self-insured employer before working for two different self-insured administrators for 7 years. Mr. Colen's total experience withy self-insured entities is approximately 31 years. 5) Client References Please see Attachment B 6) General Claims Management If awarded the contract for Liability Claims Administration Services by the City of Hermosa Beach, we would perform the following: A) Review each new claim to determine whether it adheres to the reporting requirements as set forth in the California Government Code. B) Set up all new claims within 48 hours of receipt at Colen and Lee. C) Contact the claimant and/or their counsel within 48 hours of receipt of claim. This would be either through the telephone or correspondence. D) Commence investigation of claim. This would entail obtaining statements of claimants and witnesses, obtaining photographs of loss location, identifying third party contractors, obtaining whatever information city personnel would have on the matter. E) Perform an index check on the claimant(s). F) Determine liability and whether case is one to accept or reject. G) If case to reject, send letter to city recommending same. H) If case is one to accept, gather all damages documentation and evaluate case for settlement. I) Negotiate settlement. J) If case becomes litigated, refer case to approved defense counsel. Refer to approved attorney panel issued by ICRMA. K) Follow case with defense and ensure that defense counsel adheres to the litigation management guidelines. L) Attend Mandatory Settlement Conferences/Mediations. M) Work with defense counsel to determine if case can be resolved through motions etc. 2 N) If case qualifies, report case to ICRMA and keep ICRMA administrator up to date with timely status reports. 7) Litigation Management It is no secret that in today's litigious society, the legal fee's that can be incurred on a single litigated file, let alone a whole claims program, can be enormous. As such, it is imperative that a sound Litigation Management Plan be in place to handle litigated files. We at Colen and Lee have experienced claims administrators that handle both litigated and non -litigated files. As a result, our claims administrators are very familiar with litigation management guidelines. In fact, several of our client cities belong to excess pools that have litigation management guidelines that are similar to those that have been set forth in the Hermosa Beach proposal. In order to implement those guidelines, we would review, in detail, those guidelines with the handling administrators to make sure of their familiarization with them. Also, as part of our on-going file review process, the supervisor periodically reviews and audits the administrators files to ensure that quality work is being performed. As part of that process, litigation management is one of the area's that is reviewed and commented on by the supervisor. If any areas are identified that require additional training, those are brought to the attention of the administrator. As far as working with defense counsel, we would provide each attorney/law firm with copies of the litigation management guidelines. We would request that they review the guidelines and then state, in writing, that they have reviewed and agree to abide by those guidelines. Then, those guidelines would be forwarded with every lawsuit transmittal as a reminder to the attorneys that the guidelines must be followed. Furthermore, the administrator handling the particular file will work with defense counsel to ensure compliance with those guidelines. 8) Fees In reviewing the proposal, we note that the City of Hermosa Beach currently has 18 open claims. Assuming that this is a yearly average, we would propose to perform claims administration services for $ 50.00 per open claim per month or, $ 900.00 per month. As far as an annual fee is concerned, this would compute to $10,800.00 per year. We do not anticipate any increase in the fee in years two and three of the contract. 3 9) Statistical Reports Please see Attachment C Should a need arise for ad hoc reports, we will provide those at no additional charge. However, should these requests require computer programming, then the programming shall be charged at the rate of $ 125.00 per hour. 10) Program Conversion Upon being chosen as the Third Party Administrator for the City of Hermosa Beach, we would immediately contact the current administrators and request an advance tape so that we can begin the conversion process to our computer format. Barring lack of cooperation from the current administrators, we anticipate that the total conversion will be finished between 6-8 weeks from the date of the data transfer. The conversion will be charged at the rate of $ 125.00 per hour. 11) Status Meetings We agree to attend regularly scheduled status meetings at the City at no additional extra charge. We understand that these meetings will be held tri -annually. 12) Loss Control and Prevention We would provide training in the area of trip and fall on city sidewalks, transfer of risk, claims involving tree limbs and their avoidance etc. These would be provided at no cost to the City of Hermosa Beach. 13) Insurance Requirements Please see Attachment D 4 ATTACHMENT A ASSIGNED PERSONNEL RESUMES 5 I IColen and Lee (909) 861-0816 1470 S. Valley Vista Drive, email cmillard@colenandlee.com Suite 230 IDiamond Bar, Ca 91765 Christopher Millard I I I Experience 1997—Present Colen and Lee Diamond Bar, Ca Liability Unit Manager • Responsible for quality control and client relations. II. Manage staff and perform recruiting/hiring/training functions. • Prepare all new business proposals for liability dept I1988-1997 Colen and Lee Diamond Bar, Ca Claims Administrator I. Responsible for the handling of all liability claims filed against my clients. I■ Responsible for client relations with day to day contacts. • Assumed manager duties when Liability Division Manager was absent. I1986-1988 CNA Insurance Brea, Ca Senior Claims Adjuster I . Investigated and handled both litigated and non -litigated files. • Handled Bad Faith claims/lawsuits filed against company. I. Worked directly with Home Office on claims involving coverage questions. I1985-1986 Greystone Medical Assoc.. Montclair, Ca Marketing Director I • Developed and implemented a marketing program for a Workers Compensation medical evaluation firm. I. Reviewed medical reports to assure accuracy. IEducation 1976-1980 California State College San Bernardino, Ca • B.A. Business Administration with a concentration in Management. References Furnished upon request. 1 I I ATTACHMENT B CLIENT REFERENCES 6 GENERAL & AUTO LIABILITY CLIENT REFERENCES CITY OF ARCADIA 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, California 91006 (818) 574-5407 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, California 91706 (818) 960-4011 CITY OF BELL 6330 Pine Street Bell, California 90201 (323) 588-6211 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 350 Main Street El Segundo, California 90245 (310) 322-4670 Since July 1, 1987 Lisa Melendez Paralegal Since September 1, 1982 Michelle Alves Personnel Analyst Since November 15, 1995 Robert Rizzo City Manager Since July 1, 1988 Bret Plumlee Risk Manager GARDEN GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 10331 Stanford Avenue Garden Grove, California 92640 (714) 663-6133 CITY OF INDUSTRY Post Office Box 3366 City of Industry, California 91744 (818) 333-2211 1 Since October 1, 1988 Sue McCann Assistant Superintendent of Business Since July 1, 1988 Philip Iriarte City Manager CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH 1400 Highland Avenue Manhattan Beach, California 90266 (310) 545-5621 CITY OF MONROVIA 415 South Ivy Avenue Monrovia, California 91016-2888 (818) 359-3231 CITY OF MONTEBELLO 1600 Beverly Boulevard Montebello, California 90640 (213) 725-1200 CITY OF POMONA 505 South Garey Avenue Pomona, California 91769 (909) 620-2296 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH 415 Diamond Street Redondo Beach, California 90277 (310) 372-1171 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 (909) 396-2038 CITY OF UPLAND 460 North Euclid Avenue Upland, California 91786 (909) 982-1352 CITY OF VERNON 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, California 90058 (323) 583-8811 YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES 625 South New Hampshire Avenue Los Angeles, California 90005-1371 (213) 351-2207 2 Since October 1, 1984 Howard Fishman Risk Manager Since May 1, 1988 Theresa St. Peter Director of Human Resources Since January 1, 1987 Ron Chan Risk Manager Since January 1, 1984 Julie Their! Risk Manager Since October 1, 1983 Jill Buchholz Risk Manager Since July 1, 2000 William Johnson Risk Management Since July 1, 1988 Jane Fleenor Personnel Director/Risk Manager Since October 1, 1986 Joan Francone Risk Manager Since November 1, 1993 Doug Grogan Senior Vice President ATTACHMENT C STATISTICAL REPORTS 1 MI- UN EN M- NM EN- NM EN s NIS I- 1 1 111111 CITY OF YOURTOWN GENERAL & AUTO LIABILITY CLAIMS MANAGEMENT REPORTS AS OF MARCH 31, 1988 for Jane Doe at City of Yourtown 11- NM N M I 1 I OM M M- N I M M MO r MARCH 31. 1988 PAGE 1 CITY OF YOURTOWN GENERAL & AUTO LIABILITY CLAIMS MANAGEMENT REPORTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 1 General Information 2 Summary by Year and Loss Type 3 Voucher/Check Register 4 Claims Opened this Month 5 Claims Closed this Month 6 Claims in Litigation 7 Claims Listed by Allocation 8 Claims Listed by Year and Claimant 10 Claims Listed by Loss Type and Claimant 12 Claims Listed by Severity 18 Summary by Year and Allocation 19 Summary by Allocation and Year 20 Claims Listed by Year and Claim Number 21 Claims Listed by Allocation and Employee 23 PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE 11111 I all N M = = = I ME NM EN EN M MN 1 N N MARCH 31. 1988 PAGE 2 CITY OF YOURTOWN GENERAL & AUTO LIABILITY CLAIMS MANAGEMENT REPORTS GENERAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION LIST 1. Jane Doe. City of Yourtown. 100 North Main Street, Yourtown. CA 90001 KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS ABI = Auto Bodily Injury APD = Auto Property Damage ABI/PD = Auto Bodily Injury OBI = Other Bodily Injury OBI/PD = Other Bodily Injury with Property Damage OPD = Other Property Damage with Property Damage C = Closed L = Litigated E = Excess Insurers Notified SIR = Self Insurance Retention ASL = Aggregate Stop Loss INFORMATION CONTACT PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE Christopher Millard c/o Colen & Lee. 1470 South Valley Vista Drive, Suite 230, Diamond Bar, California 91765, telephone (909) 861-0816 I MI M M I N M = OM I M IIIIII NM N = OM MARCH 31. 1988 PAGE 3 CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS SUMMARY BY YEAR AND LOSS TYPE PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE TYPE TOTAL OPEN TOTAL OPEN BODILY PROPERTY EXPENSE PAYMENT LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE PAYMENT & OF CASES CASES LEGAL LEGAL INJURY DAMAGE TOTAL RESERVE RESERVE TOTAL RESERVE LOSS CASES CASES LOSS LOSS TOTAL 1986-87 (250,000 SIR, 1,000.000 ASL) APD 1 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OBI 3 2 2 2 0.00 0.00 977.22 977.22 0.00 9,022.78 9.022.78 10,000.00 OBI/PD 1 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 348.50 348.50 52.000.00 9,651.50 61,651.50 62,000.00 SUBTOTAL 5 3 3 3 0.00 0.00 1,325.72 1,325.72 52,000.00 18,674.28 70,674.28 72,000.00 1987-88 (500,000 SIR, NO ASL) ABI 1 1 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 500.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 ABI/PD 1 1 0 0 500.00 0.00 15.00 515.00 3,250.00 485.00 3,735.00 4,250.00 OBI 1 1 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 OPD 2 1 0 0 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 525.00 SUBTOTAL 5 4 0 0 500.00 25.00 15.00 540.00 8,750.00 3,485.00 12,235.00 12,775.00 TOTAL 10 7 3 3 500.00 25.00 1,340.72 1,865.72 60,750.00 22,159.28 82,909.28 84,775.00 r - - M - r - - - - - - - OM MN MN NU - - MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 4 CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER NUMBER DATE AMOUNT PAYEE DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE CLAIMANT YEAR CASE NO. 00001 03/01/88 832.22 HILLIARD & JOHNSON LEGAL FEES/COSTS CHESTER, ROD 86 OO1A 00002 03/01/88 145.00 M & M COURT REPORTERS COURT REPORTER FEES CHESTER, ROD 86 OO1A 00003 03/04/88 250.00 DONALD HUBER M.D. MEDICAL EXPERT FEES DOUGLAS. CONNIE 86 002A 00004 03/06/88 25.00 KATHERINE CONNERS PD LOSS CONNERS, KATHERINE 87 OO1A 00005 03/10/88 15.00 COMPEX SYSTEMS PHOTOCOPY EXPENSE BARRIS, JENNIFER 87 004A 00006 03/15/88 98.50 R. J. FRASCO AGENCY INVESTIGATION FEES DOUGLAS. CONNIE 86 002A TOTAL 1.365.72 INN I NW NM NM I NM r it NM EN N I I NM I r N MN MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 5 YR CLAIMANT 87 APPLE, JOHN 87 BARRIS, JENNIFER 87 MENCY, WILLIAM CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS OPENED THIS MONTH PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE LOSS DATE ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS CODE TYPE LOSS EXPENSE TOTAL STATUS RESERVE RESERVE RESERVE 12/25/87 SEWER BACK-UP 0020 OPD 500.00 0.00 500.00 12/17/87 CAR REARENDED BY CITY TRUCK 0020 ABI/PD 3,250.00 485.00 3,735.00 12/24/87 CITY TRUCK RAN RED LIGHT AND BROADSIDED CAR 0020 ABI 5,000.00 500.00 5,500.00 IIIII M I MI N I- r i I MI MI MI M MI M M ON I MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 6 CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS CLOSED THIS MONTH PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE YR CLAIMANT LOSS DATE ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS CODE TYPE LOSS EXPENSE TOTAL STATUS 86 ABLE, JOHN 09/30/86 FELL ON UNEVEN SIDEWALK 0020 OBI 0.00 0.00 0.00 C 86 BAKER, MARY 07/04/86 POLICE CAR HIT PARKED CAR 0010 APD 0.00 0.00 0.00 C 87 CONNERS. KATHERINE 09/22/87 CAR WAS MISTAKENLY IMPOUNDED BY POLICE 0010 OPD 25.00 0.00 25.00 C - N NM- OM MI -- N I MI r I V- V 8 1 1 MARCH 31. 1988 PAGE 7 CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS IN LITIGATION PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE CLAIMANT LOSS DATE ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS MSC TRIAL LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE TOTAL DEFENSE FIRM - HILLIARD & JOHNSTON CHESTER. ROD 12/15/86 FALSE ARREST CHESTER, SAM 12/15/86 FALSE ARREST TOTALS FOR FIRM NUMBER OF CASES = 2 DEFENSE FIRM - PETTIFOGGER & SMITH DOUGLAS, CONNIE 08/23/88 09/23/88 08/23/88 09/23/88 08/22/86 INTERSECTION COLLISION/DESIGN DEFECT 02/01/89 03/04/89 TOTALS FOR FIRM NUMBER OF CASES = 1 0.00 977.22 6,522.78 7,500.00 0.00 0.00 2.500.00 2.500.00 0.00 9,022.78 977.22 10,000.00 0.00 348.50 61,651.50 62,000.00 0.00 61,651.50 348.50 62,000.00 M N M S 1111111 MI N M M I M I MI O I I MI M NM MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 8 LOSS DATE CLAIMANT DEPARTMENT 0010 - POLICE 07/04/86 BAKER, MARY 12/15/86 CHESTER, ROD 12/15/86 CHESTER, SAM 05/09/87 FUZZ, CLARENCE 09/22/87 CONNERS, KATHERINE CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY ALLOCATION PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS TYPE LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE TOTAL STATUS POLICE CAR HIT PARKED CAR APD FALSE ARREST OBI FALSE ARREST OBI ALTERCATION WITH POLICE OBI CAR WAS MISTAKENLY IMPOUNDED BY POLICE OPD TOTALS FOR DEPARTMENT 0010 C 977.22 6,522.78 7,500.00 L 2,500.00 2,500.00 L 2,500.00 2,500.00 25.00 25.00 C 25.00 11,522.78 977.22 12,525.00 NB N MI 11111 NM I MN M NM EN S 1 NM MI MI N MN MN 11111 MARCH 31. 1988 PAGE 9 LOSS DATE CLAIMANT DEPARTMENT 0020 - PUBLIC WORKS 08/22/86 DOUGLAS, CONNIE 09/30/86 ABLE. JOHN 12/17/87 BARRIS. JENNIFER 12/24/87 MENCY, WILLIAM 12/25/87 APPLE, JOHN CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY ALLOCATION PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS TYPE LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE TOTAL STATUS INTERSECTION COLLISION/DESIGN DEFECT OBI/PD FELL ON UNEVEN SIDEWALK OBI CAR REARENDED BY CITY TRUCK ABI/PD 500.00 CITY TRUCK RAN RED LIGHT AND BROADSIDED CAR ABI SEWER BACK-UP OPD TOTALS FOR DEPARTMENT 0020 348.50 61.651.50 62,000.00 L E 15.00 3,735.00 4,250.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 71.386.50 363.50 72,250.00 C M N— I MN MI I r N I— N i all M NM M M 1111111 MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 10 CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY YEAR AND CLAIMANT PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE CASE CLAIMANT DATE CODE TYPE BODILY PROPERTY EXPENSE BODILY PROPERTY EXPENSE TOTAL STATUS NO. ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS OF OF INJURY DAMAGE INJURY DAMAGE RESERVE LOSS LOSS LOSS LOSS RESERVE RESERVE 1986.87 (250,000 SIR, 1,000,000 ASL) 004A ABLE. JOHN 09/30/86 0020 OBI FELL ON UNEVEN SIDEWALK 003A BAKER, MARY 07/04/86 0010 APD POLICE CAR HIT PARKED CAR OO1A CHESTER, ROD 12/15/86 0010 OBI FALSE ARREST OO1B CHESTER, SAM 12/15/86 0010 OBI FALSE ARREST 002A DOUGLAS, CONNIE 08/22/86 0020 OBI/PD INTERSECTION COLLISION/DESIGN DEFECT (END OF LIST FOR THIS PERIOD) 977.22 6,522.78 7,500.00 L 2,500.00 2,500.00 L 348.50 50.000.00 2,000.00 9,651.50 62,000.00 L E C C 11111 1 N E— 1— ! I— — NM In MI 1 r — I an MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 11 CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY YEAR AND CLAIMANT PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE CASE CLAIMANT DATE CODE TYPE BODILY PROPERTY EXPENSE BODILY PROPERTY EXPENSE TOTAL STATUS NO. ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS OF OF INJURY DAMAGE INJURY DAMAGE RESERVE LOSS LOSS LOSS LOSS RESERVE RESERVE 1987-88 (500.000 SIR, NO ASL) 003A APPLE, JOHN 12/25/87 0020 OPD SEWER BACK-UP 004A BARRIS, JENNIFER 12/17/87 0020 ABI/PD 500.00 CAR REARENDED BY CITY TRUCK OO1A CONNERS, KATHERINE 09/22/87 0010 OPD CAR WAS MISTAKENLY IMPOUNDED BY POLICE 002A FUZZ, CLARENCE 05/09/87 0010 OBI ALTERCATION WITH POLICE 005A MENCY, WILLIAM 12/24/87 0020 ABI CITY TRUCK RAN RED LIGHT AND BROADSIDED CAR (END OF LIST FOR THIS PERIOD) 25.00 500.00 15.00 2.500.00 750.00 5.000.00 500.00 485.00 4,250.00 25.00 C 2,500.00 2.500.00 500.00 5,500.00 MI OM I M UM = M 1 M MI INIII I I IIMII 111111 IIIII I N N MARCH 31. 1988 PAGE 12 LOSS DATE CLAIMANT LOSS TYPE - ABI 12/24/87 MENCY, WILLIAM CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY LOSS TYPE AND CLAIMANT PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS CODE LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE TOTAL STATUS CITY TRUCK RAN RED LIGHT AND BROADSIDED CAR 0020 5,500.00 5,500.00 TOTALS FOR LOSS TYPE ABI 5,500.00 5,500.00 E MN E NM ME -= OM -= OM= NM r M- - E MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 13 LOSS DATE CLAIMANT LOSS TYPE - ABI/PD CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY LOSS TYPE AND CLAIMANT PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS CODE LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE TOTAL STATUS 12/17/87 BARRIS, JENNIFER CAR REARENDED BY CITY TRUCK 0020 500.00 15.00 3,735.00 4,250.00 TOTALS FOR LOSS TYPE ABI/PD 500.00 3,735.00 15.00 4,250.00 IMI N N N NIII I I NM 111111 N MN 11111 EN I I 111111 1 I I MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 14 LOSS DATE CLAIMANT CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY LOSS TYPE AND CLAIMANT PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS CODE LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE TOTAL STATUS LOSS TYPE - APD 07/04/86 BAKER, MARY POLICE CAR HIT PARKED CAR 0010 C TOTALS FOR LOSS TYPE APD MN 11111 IMN MN NM M I N ME MN INM = NM N N ME E 10111 11111 MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 15 LOSS DATE CLAIMANT LOSS TYPE - OBI CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY LOSS TYPE AND CLAIMANT PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS CODE LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE TOTAL STATUS 09/30/86 ABLE, JOHN FELL ON UNEVEN SIDEWALK 0020 C 12/15/86 CHESTER, ROD FALSE ARREST 0010 977.22 6,522.78 7,500.00 L 12/15/86 CHESTER, SAM FALSE ARREST 0010 2.500.00 2,500.00 L 05/09/87 FUZZ, CLARENCE ALTERCATION WITH POLICE 0010 2,500.00 2,500.00 TOTALS FOR LOSS TYPE OBI 11,522.78 977.22 12,500.00 EN 111111 MN 1 MB 1 EN MN N 1IN I I 1 N MB I S MI NE MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 16 LOSS DATE CLAIMANT LOSS TYPE - OBI/PD 08/22/86 DOUGLAS, CONNIE CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY LOSS TYPE AND CLAIMANT PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS CODE LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE TOTAL STATUS INTERSECTION COLLISION/DESIGN DEFECT 0020 348.50 61,651.50 62,000.00 L E TOTALS FOR LOSS TYPE OBI/PD 61,651.50 348.50 62.000.00 N MN E- MI i NM I NM MI N MI ON - -- IN NM NM MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 17 LOSS DATE CLAIMANT LOSS TYPE - OPD 09/22/87 CONNERS, KATHERINE 12/25/87 APPLE. JOHN CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY LOSS TYPE AND CLAIMANT PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS CODE LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE TOTAL STATUS CAR WAS MISTAKENLY IMPOUNDED BY POLICE 0010 25.00 25.00 C SEWER BACK-UP 0020 500.00 500.00 TOTALS FOR LOSS TYPE OPD 25.00 500.00 525.00 11111 11111 I N EN I INII 1111 EN 11111 NM NE INII I MN I I MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 18 LOSS DATE CLAIMANT 08/22/86 DOUGLAS. CONNIE CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS OVER $10,000 IN ORDER OF SEVERITY PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS TYPE LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE TOTAL STATUS INTERSECTION COLLISION/DESIGN DEFECT OBI/PD 348.50 61,651.50 62,000.00 L E TOTALS 61.651.50 348.50 62,000.00 N 1 E MO w- N M E g M 1 N N N S E ■r ■■ MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 19 CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS SUMMARY BY YEAR AND ALLOCATION PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE CODE TOTAL OPEN TOTAL OPEN BODILY PROPERTY EXPENSE PAYMENT LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE PAYMENT & NO. CASES CASES LEGAL LEGAL INJURY DAMAGE TOTAL RESERVE RESERVE TOTAL RESERVE CASES CASES LOSS LOSS TOTAL 1986-87 (250.000 SIR. 1.000.000 ASL) 0010 3 2 2 2 0.00 0.00 977.22 977.22 0.00 9,022.78 9,022.78 10,000.00 0020 2 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 348.50 348.50 52,000.00 9,651.50 61,651.50 62,000.00 SUBTOTAL 5 3 3 3 0.00 0.00 1,325.72 1,325.72 52,000.00 18,674.28 70,674.28 72,000.00 1987-88 (500.000 SIR. NO ASL) 0010 2 1 0 0 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,525.00 0020 3 3 0 0 500.00 0.00 15.00 515.00 8,750.00 985.00 9,735.00 10,250.00 SUBTOTAL 5 4 0 0 500.00 25.00 15.00 540.00 8,750.00 3.485.00 12,235.00 12,775.00 TOTAL 10 7 3 3 500.00 25.00 1.340.72 1,865.72 60,750.00 22,159.28 82,909.28 84.775.00 IIIMI 1 1 NM N 11111 1 IIIN N I MN I N IIIIN 1 N 1111M M MN MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 20 CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS SUMMARY BY ALLOCATION AND YEAR PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE YEAR TOTAL OPEN TOTAL OPEN BODILY PROPERTY EXPENSE PAYMENT LOSS EXPENSE RESERVE PAYMENT & CASES CASES LEGAL LEGAL INJURY DAMAGE TOTAL RESERVE RESERVE TOTAL RESERVE CASES CASES LOSS LOSS TOTAL DEPARTMENT 0010 - POLICE 1986-87 3 2 2 2 0.00 0.00 977.22 977.22 0.00 9,022.78 9,022.78 10,000.00 1987-88 2 1 0 0 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,525.00 SUBTOTAL 5 3 2 2 0.00 25.00 977.22 1,002.22 0.00 11,522.78 11,522.78 12,525.00 DEPARTMENT 0020 - PUBLIC WORKS 1986-87 2 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 348.50 348.50 52,000.00 9,651.50 61,651.50 62,000.00 1987-88 3 3 0 0 500.00 0.00 15.00 515.00 8,750.00 985.00 9.735.00 10,250.00 SUBTOTAL 5 4 1 1 500.00 0.00 363.50 863.50 60,750.00 10,636.50 71,386.50 72,250.00 TOTAL 10 7 3 3 500.00 25.00 1,340.72 1,865.72 60,750.00 22,159.28 82,909.28 84,775.00 NM E 11.11 r NM MO ME MN =I N NM N M MI M WM MI IIIII I MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 21 CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY YEAR AND CLAIM NUMBER PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE CASE CLAIMANT DATE CODE TYPE BODILY PROPERTY EXPENSE BODILY PROPERTY EXPENSE TOTAL STATUS NO. ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS OF OF INJURY DAMAGE INJURY DAMAGE RESERVE LOSS LOSS LOSS LOSS RESERVE RESERVE 1986-87 (250,000 SIR, 1,000.000 ASL) OO1A CHESTER. ROD 12/15/86 0010 OBI 977.22 6,522.78 7,500.00 L FALSE ARREST OO1B CHESTER. SAM 12/15/86 0010 OBI 2,500.00 2,500.00 L FALSE ARREST 002A DOUGLAS. CONNIE 08/22/86 0020 OBI/PD 348.50 50.000.00 2,000.00 9,651.50 62,000.00 L E INTERSECTION COLLISION/DESIGN DEFECT 003A BAKER. MARY 07/04/86 0010 APD C POLICE CAR HIT PARKED CAR 004A ABLE, JOHN 09/30/86 0020 OBI C FELL ON UNEVEN SIDEWALK (END OF LIST FOR THIS PERIOD) r I MI w I I UN MI N NS NM M MI M 1 I M MARCH 31. 1988 PAGE 22 CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY YEAR AND CLAIM NUMBER PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE CASE CLAIMANT DATE CODE TYPE BODILY PROPERTY EXPENSE BODILY PROPERTY EXPENSE TOTAL STATUS NO. ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS OF OF INJURY DAMAGE INJURY DAMAGE RESERVE LOSS LOSS LOSS LOSS RESERVE RESERVE 1987-88 (500.000 SIR. NO ASL) OO1A CONNERS, KATHERINE 09/22/87 0010 OPD CAR WAS MISTAKENLY IMPOUNDED BY POLICE 002A FUZZ. CLARENCE 05/09/87 0010 OBI ALTERCATION WITH POLICE 003A APPLE, JOHN 12/25/87 0020 OPD SEWER BACK-UP 004A BARRIS, JENNIFER 12/17/87 0020 ABI/PD 500.00 CAR REARENDED BY CITY TRUCK 005A MENCY. WILLIAM 12/24/87 0020 ABI CITY TRUCK RAN RED LIGHT AND BROADSIDED CAR (END OF LIST FOR THIS PERIOD) 25.00 15.00 2,500.00 500.00 2,500.00 750.00 485.00 5,000.00 500.00 25.00 C 2.500.00 500.00 4,250.00 5,500.00 W WM NW WM WIII WM WM W W OW NW WI N WM r I NW NW MARCH 31. 1988 PAGE 23 CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY ALLOCATION AND EMPLOYEE PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE EMPLOYEE LOSS DATE CLAIMANT ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS LOSSES EXPENSES STATUS DEPARTMENT 0010 - POLICE SMITH. ROBERT 07/04/86 BAKER. MARY POLICE CAR HIT PARKED CAR 0.00 0.00 C MI MI EN M IN N r I A MI N NM r NM- r NM NM NM MARCH 31, 1988 PAGE 24 CITY OF YOURTOWN LIABILITY CLAIMS LISTED BY ALLOCATION AND EMPLOYEE PREPARED BY COLEN & LEE EMPLOYEE LOSS DATE CLAIMANT ALLEGED CAUSE OF LOSS LOSSES EXPENSES STATUS DEPARTMENT 0020 - PUBLIC WORKS JONES, PETER SMITH, MARK 12/17/87 BARRIS, JENNIFER 12/24/87 MENCY, WILLIAM CAR REARENDED BY CITY TRUCK CITY TRUCK RAN RED LIGHT AND BROADSIDED CAR 500.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 ATTACHMENT D INSURANCE CERTIFICATES 8 I740 PROFESSIONALS. t t 1 CERTIFICATE OF INSURAN' This is to certify that the -policy of insurance listed below has been issuedto the Named` Insured. This certificate is.. issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the Certificate Holder. This certificatedoes not amend, extend :or alter the coverage afforded by the policy listed below. Limits shown may have been reduced by paid: claims. Named Insured and Mailing Address: Coten and Lee, Inc: 1470 South Valley Vista Drive Suite 230 Diamond Bar., California 91765 Company affording coverage:.. Gulf Insurance Company Type of insurance: Professional Liability and General Liability Policy.. Policy No.:', IG0644562 Policy Period: Effective date October 5, 2001 Expiration date October 5, 2002 12:01 A.M.,Standard Time at the Mailing Address stated above. Limits of Liability.forISPP Errors and Omissions Liability: Each Wrongful Act $2,000,000 Policy; Aggregate $2,000,000 Limits of.Liability for ISPP-General Liability: General Aggregate Limit Products -Completed -Operations Aggregate Limit Advertising Injury. Limit, Each Occurrence Limit Fire Damage Limit Retroactive Date: October 5, 1985: I Schedule. of Professional Services insured: Insurance claims administration services. 1 1 1 Certificate Holder Name and. Address: City of.Alhambra. 111 South First Street Alhambra, California 91801 Attn: Carolyn Yup City Clerk $2,000,000 $2,000,'000. $2,0.00,00.0. $2;00:0,000 $50,000 NOTE: If the Named Insured is thesame as the above named Certificate Holder, written. Notice of Cancellation will be provided to the Named, Insured in accordance with the provisions ofthe policy and any applicable state law:. CANCELLATION Should theabove described policy be cancelled or coverage reduced before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will mail 30 days written notice to the above named Certificate Holder. Certificate Holder is named: as an Additional Insured Date Certificate Issued:-. September 13, 2001- "CLAIMS:MADE AND: REPORTED POLICY" I ACOREA. CERTIFICAA" VIM 1111111 OF LIABI ODUCER irlton & Company License #0008309 5 S. Los Robles Ave, Ste 105 ><sadena CA 91101 1f:1.one:626-799-7000 Fax:626-441-3233 LURED Colen & 1470 S. No. 230 Diamond Lee Inc. Valley Vista Drive Bar CA 91765 LITY INSUr \NC DEL �2 LP THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. DATE (MM/DD/YY) 09/24/01 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER A: Fidelity & Deposit Co. INSURER B: INSURER C: INSURER 0: INSURER E: )VERAGES IrHE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING 4NY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR NAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH 3OLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE (MM/DD/YY) POLICY EXPIRATION//YY T)) LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE OCCUR IAUTOMOBILE LIABILITY GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: 7 POLICY n JE Tn LOC I 1 I EACH OCCURRENCE $ FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) MED EXP (Any one person) PERSONAL & ADV INJURY GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE UABIUTY ANY AUTO AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: EA ACC AGG EXCESS LIABIUTY 7 OCCUR DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION $ CLAIMS MADE EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE $ $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' UABIUTY WCS1AFU- TORY LIMITS 01H - ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT OTHER Fidelity Bond 06106351 10/13/01 10/13/02 $1,000,000 1 SCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS ERTIFICATE HOLDER I N I ADDITIONAL INSURED; INSURER LETTER: CANCELLATION 0000000 City of Alhambra Carolyn Yup, City Clerk 111 S. First Street Alhambra CA 91801 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILLCNBCi4MOR44MAIL 3 0 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, RFIGABSGIZIAZDISSi- AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Bolton & Company , -zt-L 72 Oet% ' - CORD 25-S (7/97) ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 144'-9" (E) AND PROPOSED NEW STANDING SEAM ROOF AND FASCIA NEW STOREFRONT GLAZING 145-8" (E) AND PROPOSED (E) PARAPET 151'-6" (E) AND PROPOSED D.LiDN. ELa 13i 6' 6Eta:D FLOG[ FIRST FLOOR EAST ELEVATION (E) ROOF BEYOND NEW STOREFRONT GLAZING 134'-10" 142'-6" NEW CONCRETE RAISED PLANTERS SKYLIGHT BEYOND 134'-10" ALUCOBOND PANELS LOUVRES (E) PARKING DRIVEWAY NEW PARKING EXIT NEW PARKING ACCESS SOUTH ELEVATION (16th STREET) 147'-3" — STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF 143'-6" NEW STOREFRONT NEW OVERHEAD DOOR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF 140'-6" IIIII111111111111111 Ill ' III .iii i (E) TRANSFORMER 136'-0" 110.7 — 132'-3" BALCONY 133'-8" SECOND f-LOOR EL=121'-6" FIRST _ =107_0" PARKING EL= 97-0" «Oro FLo NORTH ELEVATION ROOFS BEYOND —133'-6" 131'-6" PAC „G 6? PARky. EL. 1,6.6' 134'-10" — PAF.4NO 45 OP WEST ELEVATION FINISH FLOOR L I3, 10 Dno P \RYIN 046 RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM, DEV. DEPT. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 4' H l I f Keis<cr WIC0c Architects-= I 1 (E) PARKING DRIVEWAY NEW PARKING EXIT NEW PARKING ACCESS SOUTH ELEVATION (16th STREET) 147'-3" — STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF 143'-6" NEW STOREFRONT NEW OVERHEAD DOOR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF 140'-6" IIIII111111111111111 Ill ' III .iii i (E) TRANSFORMER 136'-0" 110.7 — 132'-3" BALCONY 133'-8" SECOND f-LOOR EL=121'-6" FIRST _ =107_0" PARKING EL= 97-0" «Oro FLo NORTH ELEVATION ROOFS BEYOND —133'-6" 131'-6" PAC „G 6? PARky. EL. 1,6.6' 134'-10" — PAF.4NO 45 OP WEST ELEVATION FINISH FLOOR L I3, 10 Dno P \RYIN 046 RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2002 COM, DEV. DEPT. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 4' 8' 16' 32' May 21, 2002 Keis<cr WIC0c Architects-= HERMOSA �r BEACH 2(961 om,n o de _strep] CCoplgr'cto. Beach P.._4= 58 2tirF.0 ' =`' r. ,.?'e3275J E. &mai'' CD V.v,-erchitecis.ce.. Pacific Coast Highway at 16th Street Hermosa Beach, California C Keisker & Wiggle Architects, Inc. A copyright is claimed on this unpublished material by Keisker & Wiggle Architects, Inc. No publication or furhter distribution is allowed without 5 N x ; :t.tti ,< „Fs 4r H e AL S T A T r CROUP the written permission of Keisker & Wiggle Architects, Inc. All rights reserved. LT (949) 450-0100 �„ -I— F a) ^a) W) r I Of 1 q, tk?�l r SHOOK DEVELOPMENT 220 Technology Drive, Suite 110 • Irvine, CA 92618 • FAX: (949) 450-0800 - 3 k ri/lrarAI AlrAtall'aillIr Mr"' / TrAir IP lel* . ;poig 7 . #00 4pr,.. ASS "mi,E ms s. oissimmag ImMINKIMSiv 4 e 111 i 1 0 0 /0 v vl/ / , p2iTo�♦:o♦:ais� A 0ieen1 "IF AN 01- 1 ZISUSIZIIMMISIM MAW 4IZIAZI 4t ammo3am:1am :ammoAZZISFISIGNISIZIR 411. a$ pro: �♦♦+ � e*Agat °. JAPOPPDA4 i • ii tiz; PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL PLAN o 4' May 23, 2002 8' 16' 32' HERMOSA BEACH 2.O961 942/3881 P. 949/383-27.50 C. ecla:i Cciskcr WIC O fr6 AcnCtAV�LUSN C•on"lin.o de Estrella ""t `y'' C�pstrcnoEVa--h �.8'fP. 2EID <2a l"l {..w.crchitects.corn C Pacific Coast Highway at 16th Street Hermosa Beach California - s -p _ 0 Keisker & Wiggle Architects, Inc. A copyright is claimed on this unpublished material by Keisker & Wiggle Architects, Inc. No publication or furhter distribution is allowed without the written permission of Keisker & Wiggle Architects, Inc, All rights reserved. E4 " r1 E A 4 .STATE GROUP (949) 450-0100 R • 0SHOOK W!� J Of I � DEVELOPMENT � x. 220 Technology Drive, Suite 110 • Irvine, CA 92618 • FAX: (949) 450-0500 PARKING LEVEL 5A DOWN PARKING LEVEL 6B OPEN TO BELOW SIM 1111111111 ya..-Y•- •-• rY S le 4 I) .040440 froastai , *ninon makitsimmminommommommml �■Ufa■ffffff■ffuffffu::.>.�_ �:.'•.') 11111111111111111111•1111111111111111111111111111111111k_„ :: fffffffufft'fffuff■ffffff■ff■■fff■ffffffff ■■ffffIIIIIIIMIL ffffffffffn������ff ■ffffffff� fufffu■f MIMS — off --°II ffff■ufffuff f■ �7 �.ffffff■fffN ff rw INN N I M■•■ NMI :� .: _fff■f EF 96.15 (E) step ■ fffuf■f ■•�--�fccfr-• M•saga, WWIr' I■Iff- UaUUUUans. a SW MI Ififf I SMIIIIIIMIIIIIII1y2AMIIIIIIMMEIIIIIIMINIIIMMISSIMINIMIMIIIIIM ::! ff fffuu■fuuf la mill1M1111111111MI lin I ufff ff 1111111111ff■■ffufu u■u411:; ,.-lffvfuf■f■ �uf■fff■► ::::.::.:::::"::::::' aff ■t .asi —#w 1111111111111M1 11111.. __ SAM riff■ .�,...'L"�■■■. uf," .regia C11eir NEW RAISED CONCRETE PLANTERS - SEAT HEIGHT NEW PALM TREES WITH FLOWERS AND SHRUBS BELOW SECOND FLOOR OVERHANG NEW DECORATIVE EXISTING RAISED PAVING PLANTER CITY SIDEWALK PROPOSED STREET LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 0 4' 8' 16' 32' May 23, 2002 Ccis<er ArcnitcctsJ c HERMOSA BEACH PAVILION 25261 Camino Ce Estrena " t r �' . . t`C Reach .c-1 LS12E0 c:4 F. 49/38: 2760 E citta:''. C kw-orchtects.ccrn Pacific Coast Highway at 16th Street Hermosa Beach, California m Keisker & Wiggle Architects, Inc. A copyright is claimed on this unpublished material by Keisker & Wiggle Architects, Inc. No a ,.z publication or furhter REAL G E T A T E OR O U P distribution is allowed without the written permission of Keisker . & Wiggle Architects, Inc. All rights reserved. • (949) 450-0100 a �;Ea�1 W t�I- SHOOK DEVELOPMENT ""' `` 220 Technology Drive, Suite 110 • Irvine, CA 92615 • FAX: (949) 450-0500 � Of 14 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Vc,t May 21, 2002 Regular Meeting of May 28, 2002 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #26019 (C.U.P. CON NO. 00-14, PDP NO. 00-15) LOCATION: 506 11TH STREET APPLICANT(S): STEVEN R. LEGARE REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #26019 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a three unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #26019 at their November 21, 2000 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A, County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. 2k Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: of Blumenfe Community , D ector evelopment Department Stephen R. Burrell City Manager k�fuV��V Respectfully subm' ted s, • ertson Associate Planner y/f:fm506-11th 1 2 3 4 5 RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #26019 FOR A THREE UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 506 11TH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on May 28, 2002 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 00-47 adopted after hearing on November 21, 2000; E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #26019 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of a portion of Lot 10, Knutsen Tract, as recorded in Book 20, Page 185 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a three -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 506 11th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 28th day of May, 2002. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California AT LEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY f fm506-11thrs ONE PARCEL 4,698 S.F. SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL VAP \00 26019 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 10, OF KNUTSEN TRACT, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20, PAGE 185 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID ND SUB.B+5SION. STEVEN R. LEGARE SUBDIVIDER RECORD OWNER: STEVEN R. LEGARE AND ALICE LEGARE THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 3 UNITS WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ON A-2/2000/ BEFORE MEI, / ee JP/ 46A/,SpIV A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED 6ThJV • ,Le__6 ))RE PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HEF:/THEIR ,AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES) AND THAT BY HIS/ HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE III' WILKINSON Commission # 1297358 z Notary Public - California > Los Angeles County My Ccxrm. l xpires Mar 16. arils NAME: ,,Lee /A,12, /J MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES .3./6 EASEMENT OF WARREN GILLELEN, FOR WATER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617, PAGE 47 OF DEEDS. SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. L HEREBY CERTIFY THAT SECURITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 6, 0 HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AS SECURITY FOR THE PAYMENT OF TAXES AND SPEC IAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES ON THE LAND SHOWN ON MAP OF TRACT NO./PARCEL MAP NO. Z 6 O 19 AS REQUIRED BY LAW. EXECUTIVE OFFICER -CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANE (1/7 G , STATL�,T AFORN DEPUTY c 5/4576 Y 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL CERTIFICATES HAVE BEE;i+ FILED AND DEPOSITS HAVE BEEN MADE THAT ARE REQUIRED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 66492 AND 66493 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. EXECUTIVE OFFICER -CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGE STATE OF CALIFORNI BY DEPUTY 054-is7 (4187-18) �76/oz RECEIVign MAY 2 0 2.002 COM. DEV. DEPT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCES AT THE REOUEST OF STE\/EN R. LEGARE ON 04- I I -0! I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. EDWARD G. SHWEIRI R.C.E. 1 1284 EXPIRATION: 12-31-04 RECORD DATA WAS TAKEN FROM KNUTSEN TRACT, M.B. 20- 185 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH: AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. JAMES A. NOYES CITY ENGINEER DEPUTY R.C.E.OZ,2273 EXPIRES f—,5'0 —0 3" COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP, THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER COUNTY ENGINEER BY DEPUTY RCE NO. DATE EXPIRES CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE DAY OF , 20__ APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 200_ SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE SCALE: I " =.20' PARCEL SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS VAP \O. 26019 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS \GELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSE FD NAIL 8 TIN PER TRACT NO. 33760 M.B. 893-7-8 W z W U) W fY CD a e e INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP 0_ ELY LINE OF LOT I I *� W'LY LINE OF DEED REC. JULY 24, 1953 AS DOC. NO. 816 AND ELY LINE OF P.M. NO. 21234 P.M.B. 241-53 2.42' 12°50'00"W 125.00' 0 0 N IITH STREET N 77°50'00"E 0 o 0 N N 77°50'00"E 40.00' 37.58' i A= 4,698 SO FT. �. • 37.58' e N 77°50'00"E 40.00' • • • • V 0 0 N 12°50'00"W W'LY LINE OF LOT 9 S'LY LINE OF LOT 10 KNUTSEN TRACT M.B. 20-185 FD 4 CHIS "X" ON RIM OF M.H. PER TRACT NO. 33760, M.B. 893-7-8 t