Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08/13/02
gA _1*(o • Storms matte trees take deeper roots.- - Claude McDonald AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, August 13, 2002 — 7:10 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session Hermosa Beach Community Center, Room 4 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach MAYOR Kathy Dunbabin MAYOR PRO IEM Sam Y. Edgerton COUNCIL MEMBERS Michael Keegan J. R. Reviczky Art Yoon CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman CITY MANAGER Stephen R. Burrell CITY ATTORNEY Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer. City Council agendas and staff reports are available for your review on the City's web site located at www.hermosabch.org CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF JULY 23, 2002: NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda as a business item. 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction, or to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar, may do so at this time. Comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Commentsfrom the public are limited to three minutes per speaker. Members of the audience may also speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; and, 3) during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. The City Council acknowledges receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in written communications. The Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda: Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. a. Letter from Jim Lissner regarding the City website. b. Letter from Larry Peha and petition from residents. requesting speed bumps on 24th Place. c. Letter from Jim Lissner regarding banning banner towers. d. Letter from Michael Brock and Angelina Moss requesting a zone change, General Plan Amendment and fee reduction for their property located at 1222-1230 Corona. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 4, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on June 25, 2002; and, 2) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on July 8, 2002. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. I • • (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of July 17, 2002. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #26057 for a 2 -unit condominium project at 709 & 711 1st Place. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 31, 2002. (f) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #25665 for a 2 -unit condominium project at 30 & 32 8th Street. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 31, 2002. (g) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #26290 for a 2 -unit. condominium project at 2930 & 2934 Hermosa Avenue. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 31, 2002. (h) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Ma #26299 for a 2 -unit condominium project at 617 & 619 1st Street. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 31, 2002. (i) (J) Recommendation to adopt resolution adopting and amending the existing Memorandum of Understanding with the Los Angeles County Interagency Metropolitan Police Apprehension Crime Task Force (also known as L.A. Impact). Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin dated August 6, 2002. Recommendation to adopt resolution confirming the interest of participating in the South Bay Communities and Affiliates Energy Efficiency Program (SBCA) and designating a point of contract for the City. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 30, 2002. (k) Recommendation to authorize the purchase andinstallation of Motorola brand UHF mobile and portable radio hardware and software for the Fire Department from South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority at a cost of $30,727.65 and authorize the re -appropriation of $30,728 from the 2001/2002 budget to the 2002/2003 budget to accomplish this purchase. Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated August 1, 2002. (1) Recommendation to award the Fire Department Apparatus Preventative Maintenance Program to Sepulveda's Fleet Service, Azusa, CA, in the amount of $31,655.00 and appropriate $885.00 from the Equipment Replacement Fund for the program. Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated August 1, 2002, 3 fr • (m) Recommendation to award a Professional Services Agreement to AAE, Inc. for providing City Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning Services for a not -to -exceed fee of $18,000; authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the PSA subject to approval by the City Attorney; authorize staff to negotiate an agreement with AAE, Inc. for services in FY 2003-04; and, authorize the acquisition of additional services by individual Task Order. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated August 6, 2002. (n) Recommendation to approve the request from the Beach Cities Health District to use the end of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier from 7:30am to 9:OOam for a commemorative program and the first anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks; waive fees as requested; and, approve the closure of the Pier to fishing and other uses for the duration of the set-up and event. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated August 7, 2002. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 02-1222 — "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 8.12.360, GARBAGE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL -MANDATORY FEE COLLLECTION, REMOVING THE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR FILING AN ALTERNATIVE BILLING APPLICATION (PAYMENT BY TENANT)." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 31, 2002. 4 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. a. ADOPTION OF METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MTA) LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT AND SELF CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 25, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution. • b. APPLICANT APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 1100 THE STRAND, "SCOTTY'S", AND CONSIDERATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (1HE REQUESTED AMENDMENTS WERE FOR ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL; TO ADD BAR SEATING IN THE PATIO AREA; TO ADD AMPLIFIED LIVE ENTERTAINMENT; A TAKE-OUT FOOD SERVICE WINDOW; AND 24-HOUR OPERATION.) THE APPLICANT'S APPEAL INCLUDES PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE INITIAL REQUEST TO LIMIT HOURS OF OPERATION TO BETWEEN 6:00 A.M. AND 2:00 A.M., TO LIMIT LIVE ENTERTAINMENT TO NON -AMPLIFIED, AND TO REDUCE THE BAR SEATING AREA. (Continued from meetings of May 28, 2002 and July 23, 2002) Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated August 5, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Deny requested Conditional Use Permit Amendment. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. SURFERS' WALK OF FAME — PROPOSAL FROM ROGER BACON TO INSTALL PLAQUES ON THE PIER TO RECOGNIZE THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE EARLY SURFERS TO THE HISTORY OF HERMOSA BEACH. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated August 7, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Review and consider the proposal, including the process for selection of the individuals to be honored and the placement of the plaques in the deck of the pier. b. REPORT ON THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE TAXI PROGRAM IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin dated August 5, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction to staff on the future course of the program. c. ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8.24.050 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE — PERMITTED HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 30, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Waive full reading and introduce ordinance. • • d. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY SUMMARY — MARCH 2001 -JULY 2002. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated August 6, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file report and direct staff to initiate a Code Enforcement Citation Program. e. PROJECT NO. CEP 00-630 - PIER RENOVATION, PHASE III - RECEIVE LIFEGUARD BUILDING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING REPORT AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT FOURTH AMENDMENT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated August 5, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Receive and file the structural analysis report; 2) approve the Fourth Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Purkiss•Rose — RSI for either Options 1 or 2; 3) authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to execute said amendment, upon approval as to form by the City Attorney; 4) authorize the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to make adjustments to the scope of work as necessary, not to exceed 10% of the amendment amount; and, 5) direct Staff to discuss the condition of the lifeguard building and related issues with Los Angeles County and return to City Council with more information. f. AMENDMENT TO THE STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION CONTROL ORDINANCE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 30, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt ordinance amending the storm water pollution. control for planning and construction of new development and redevelopment projects and amending and supplementing the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and declaring the urgency thereof. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS- CITY MANAGER a. AB1163 (CALDERON) — SPECIAL LEGISLATION REGARDING WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 31, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Consider taking a support position for AB1163. 6 d. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY SUMMARY - MARCH 2001 -JULY 2002. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated August 6, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file report and direct staff to initiate a Code Enforcement Citation Program. PROJECT NO. CIE' 00-630 - PIER RENOVATION, PHASE III - RECEIVE LIFEGUARD BUILDING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING REPORT AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT FOURTH AMENDMENT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated August 5, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Receive and file the structural analysis report; 2) approve the Fourth Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Purkiss•Rose — RSI for either Options 1 or 2; 3) authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to execute said amendment, upon approval as to form by the City Attorney; 4) authorize the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to make adjustments to the scope of work as necessary, not to exceed 10% of the amendment amount; and, 5) direct Staff to discuss the condition of the lifeguard building and related issues with Los Angeles County and return to City Council with more information. f. AMENDMENT TO THE STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION CONTROL ORDINANCE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 30, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt ordinance amending the storm water pollution control for planning and construction of new development and redevelopment projects and amending and supplementing the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and declaring the urgency thereof. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. AB1163 (CALDERON) - SPECIAL LEGISLATION REGARDING WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 31, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Consider taking a support position for AB1163. • BEACH CITIES COMMITTEE - POTENTIAL AREAS WHERE THE CITIES COULD DEVELOP JOINT PROGRAMS TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO RESIDENTS OF ALL PARTICIPATING CITIES Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated August 7, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Review the list of potential areas where the Beach Cities Committee could consider operating jointly or under contract to the other cities. c. UPPER PIER AVENUE STREETSCAPE AND TRAVEL LANES. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated August 8, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Review the information prepared by IBI, Inc. in 1996 and provide further direction to staff. d. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF BANNER PERMITS FEES FROM* THE HERMOSA BEACH WOMAN'S CLUB FOR THE ANNUAL PANCAKE BREAKFAST. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated August 8,-2002. RECOMMENDATION: Consider waiving the $229 banner fee. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. VACANCIES — BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS UPCOMING EXPIRATION OF TERMS Recommendation: Direct the City Clerk to immediately advertise and request application from interested parties for two Public Works Commission terms that will expire October 31, 2002, with appointments to be made at the regular Council meeting of October 22, 2002. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. NONE • ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on July 23, 2002. 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 710 Pier Avenue Negotiating Parties: City of Hermosa Beach and AT&T Compass Telecom Under Negotiation: Lease and Terms of Payment 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) a. • Name of Case: City of Hermosa Beach v. City of Redondo Beach Case Number: BS075570 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT JUL-22-02 MON 14:44 LISSNER-TBDTP 310 3762287 • P.01 ''ACSIMILE COVER SHEET AND MESSAGE Total number of pages including this cover sheet 1 Date: MON 7-22-02 Time To: City Council, City of Hermosa Beach Fax: (310) 372-6186 Voice: (310) 318-0216 From: James Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Fax: (310) 376-2287 Voice: (310) 376-4626 Venue: COUNCIL MEETING OF 8-02, WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Subject: CITY WEBSITE: MINUTES AND AGENDAS MISSING OR DELAYED Coun.cilmembers: On the City's website, the minutes and/or agendas for many commission and board meetings are incomplete, or missing, and the posting of Council agendas is often delayed. Specifically, for the Planning Commission, there are no minutes at all for the meetings of 6-18-02 and 11-20-01, and the minutes for the meetings of 2-19-02,12-5.01 and 10-16-01 are abbreviated ("action") minutes only. For the Civil Service Board, there are no minutes at all, and the latest agenda is from 2000. And, last but not least, the posting of Council agendas is often delayed to the day before, or the day of, the meeting. Would you please post the missing Planning minutes, resume posting the Civil Service materials, and get the Council agendas posted by 5 p.m. Friday? Sincerely, Important. The pages comprising this tocoimile tranemieeion contain confidential information from Jemee'Liaaner. This information is Icr ended solely for the use of the ina.idual or entity ngmod a9 the recipient hereof. is you aro not the ihtendea recipient. be aware that any diacloauro, copying eistribution, or use of the eoptente of this trariamisaion is prohibite4, It yon navy racelvaa this crams(nieaion in error, plcasa notify us Dy telephone immediately so that we day arrange to retrieve this lransmiasion an no cost to yon. IIIIMINISOMMBECCINSINa. P E H A & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE PLANNING • • July 30, 2002 Harold Williams Public Works Director City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: 24-th Place speed bumps Dear Harold, The enclosed petition is testimony to the concern of the residents of 24th Place between Valley and Park Ave. Not only has the traffic increased on our street but the speed at which the cars travel have become our main worry. We would like the city to consider the installation of speed bumps on our street. I have noticed the installation of an elongated type of speed bump in many residential areas in other cities such at Santa Monica, Beverly Hills and Rancho Palos Verdes to mention a few. We are anxious, so your quick response with direction as to what our next step in this process will be is much appreciated. 67 14:', SiREET HEROSA-A • 24th Place Elongated Speed Bum fM 1 f ' Wei the residennis of 24th Place between Valley Drive and Park Ave. are very concerned with the speed of traffic on our street. The constant cries of "Slow Down" are heard by the parents of over 50 children on this street. We would like to propose the installation of elongated speed bumpsjsimilar to those being used inities such as Santa Monica and Beverly Hills. __E,„ L., This petition is our formal request to start the process as required by the City of Hermosa Beach. Name Address roy A -N"')" - bite slo 2`I8' Place 5 ? /`,qdf,/ , 8 r n/-6 2-tk \I-6 2_411 DIAct 7f' . 550 -ay l P/ GA CkANS 3o Am 5i 0 pf , r�Uc Sni.) C-=-% 6 2P7 Pz- 4I 10 CVC CO CctvIcot ti • 24t" Place Elongated Speed Bump We the residence's of 24th Place between Valley Drive and Park Ave. are very concerned with the speed of traffic on our street. The constant cries of "Slow Down" are heard by the parents of over 50 children on this street. We would like to propose the installation of elongated speed bumps similar to those being used in other cities such as Santa Monica and Beverly Hills. This petition is our formal request to start the process as required by the City of Hermosa Beach. Name Address ua,ML, sqo (z)L14( Va� pA P SRt6-'� 2L1 z� LfL hzdft— ogr- LA-pte 1Q-tflitioce, JA`kk_i Akve, 56,Z, ztek tA)...Akek, S toff 244h SAr-r4 " ,/-/43-,.,_ 177; .s 21 • • 24th Place Elongated Speed Bump We the residence's of 24th Place between Valley Drive and Park Ave. are very concerned with the speed of traffic on our street. The constant cries of "Slow Down" are heard by the parents of over 50 children on this street. We would like to propose the installation of elongated speed bumps similar to those being used in other cities such as Santa Monica and Beverly Hills. This petition is our formal request to start the process as required by the City of Hermosa Beach. Name Address if„_ 59-Z � r 52-ci z-. • f. , . RUG -07-02 WED 11:07 jISSNER-,TSDTP 341 3762287 P.01 VACSIMILE COVER SHEET AND MESSAGE Total number of pages including this over sheet 1 Date: WED 8-7-02 Time To: City Council, City of Hermosa Beach Fax: (310) 372--6186 Voice: (310) 318-0216 From: James Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Fax: (310) 376-2287 Voice: (310) 376-4626 Venue: COUNCIL MEETING OF 8-13-02, WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Subject: BANNING BANNER TOWERS Couucalmernbey;s: The city council of Huntington Beach has drafted, and sent for final legal review, an ordinance regarding aerial banner advertising. Could we do the same? Sincerely, Important: Tha pagee comprising this facsimile tranemieaioe contain Confidential information from James Lieener. This information is intended solely for the use -of the indi"iauel or entity named as the recipient horaot. Zt you era noc the intended recipient. be aware that any disclosure. copying distribttion; or Wee of the contents of this transmission in prohibited. It you ba"e receiaed this transmission in error, plgaee notify us by telephone immediately so that 'e may arrange to retriou9 this transmission at no cost to you. August 8, 2002 Hermosa Beach City Council Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Council Members, We are preparing to submit an application for zoning change for our non -conforming residential property, located at 1222-1230 Corona Street. The property is currently zoned as commercial within the Aviation Blvd. Commercial corridor. As our property is surrounded on 3 1/2 sides by residential property, and Corona is a narrow residential street, we believe that the commercial zoning for our property is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The commercial corridor on Aviation Blvd. remains unaffected, since our property is setback 100 feet from Aviation. We are requesting to submit the zone change application and General Plan Amendment together and are asking for a reduction in the duplicate fees. We hope that the zone change and General Plan Amendment could be reviewed and addressed together and thereby result in a savings on the fees involved. We are not builders or developers, simply property investors within our community. Our purpose is to improve our property in a way that is complimentary to the neighborhood. We believe that this will not only increase our property value, but also increase the values of all residences on Corona Street. Angie and I own two businesses in Hermosa Beach (Yesterday's News and New Horizons) and we also permanently reside in Hermosa Beach. Since our takeover at the Yesterday's News location, we are continually complimented by members of the community on the improvement to the store's appearance. We plan to remain active in trying to make Hermosa Beach a better place for all of us to live. Thank you for your consideration on this request. Any help is most appreciated in allowing us to apply for zone change without the additional fees of General Plan Amendment. Best Regards, Michael Block Angelia Moss 1639 Prospect Ave Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 376-3767 ld MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at the hour of 7:18 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Art Yoon ROLL CALL: Present: Keegan, Reviczky, Yoon, Mayor Dunbabin Absent: Edgerton ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Dunbabin announced that the Council would be adjourning the meeting in memory of Jack Cunningham, former Manhattan Beach Mayor and lifeguard. Councilmember Reviczky requested that the meeting also be adjourned in memory of Jim Mance, one of the owners of Mickey's Deli, noting that his brother Michael had passed away not too long ago. Councilmember Keegan reported on the success of the Hermosa Arts Foundation telethon event which took place Sunday, June 16, noting that about 150 residents. participated, along with another 100 volunteers. Mayor Dunbabin announced: (1) the remodeled City Hall offices were now open and it was anticipated that the Council Chambers would be completed at the end of August or early September; (2) the "Skate Smart," "Bike Smart and "Drive Smart" banners had been installed on various light poles in the City and would continue throughout the summer, noting that the program to make the community safer was. sponsored by Mervyn's; (3) a coastal clean-up day from 10 A.M. to 1 P.M. on Thursday, June 27, with the invitation to children from 5 to 17 years of age to bring their parents/chaperones to the Hermosa Beach Pier for the event, noting there would be a variety of activities; and (4) the American Red Cross blood drive scheduled in Hermosa Beach on Wednesday, June 26, from 10 A.M. to 4 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: Angie (no last name given) - American Red Cross representative, said the donated blood would be provided to about 150 hospitals throughout California; said the blood drive would take place at the Clark building on Valley Drive, that it was sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce, and that there would be cookies and orange juice for the donors. CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF JUNE 11, 2002: No reportable actions. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None City 1,(1Council Minutes 06-2-02 Page 10865 . 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (q), with the exception of the following items, which were removed for discussion in item 4, but are shown in order for clarity: (I),Yoon, (n) Keegan, and (p) Reviczky. Motion Reviczky, second Yoon. The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE MEMORANDUM FROM CITY CLERK ELAINE DOERFLING REGARDING THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF MAY 28 AND JUNE 11, 2002. Action: To receive and file the memorandum, as recommended. (Edgerton absent) (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY CHECK REGISTER NOS. 29336 THROUGH 29472, NOTING VOIDED CHECK NO. 29397, AND TO APPROVE THE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NOS. 26464, 26708, 29377, AND 29382, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. Action: To ratify the Check Register, as presented. (Edgerton absent) (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file Tentative Future Agenda' Items, as presented. (Edgerton absent) (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE MAY 2002 FINANCIAL REPORTS: (1) Revenue and expenditure report; (2) City Treasurer's report; and (3) Investment report. Action: To receive and file the May 2002 Financial Reports, as presented. (Edgerton absent) (e) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE NOTICE OF CLOSED CLAIMS. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated June 11, 2002. Action: To receive and file notice of closed claims, as recommended by staff. (Edgerton absent) City Council Minutes 06-25-02 Page 10866 (f) (g) • • RECOMMENDATION TO EXTEND THE CURRENT CONTRACT FOR CITY ADVERTISING (LEGAL AND DISPLAY ADS) WITH THE EASY READER NEWSPAPER AND APPROVE CONTRACT FOR A TERM OF THREE YEARS. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated June 14, 2002. Action: To extend the current contract for City advertising (legal and display ads) with the Easy Reader newspaper and approve the contract for a term of three years, as recommended. (Edgerton absent) RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING CLAIM AND REFER IT TO THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated June 18, 2002.. Claimant: Suanne White Date of Loss: 05-25-02 Date Filed: 06-04-02 Action: To deny the above claim and refer it to the City's liability claims administrator, as recommended by staff. (Edgerton absent) (h) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 4; 2002. Action: To receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of June 4, 2002.. (Edgerton absent) RECOMMENDATION. TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 18, 2002. Action: To receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of June 18, 2002. (Edgerton absent) 0) RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR CIP 01-167, STREET IMPROVEMENTS — CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, TO DAMON CONSTRUCTION CO. IN THE AMOUNT OF $79,720; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE CHANGES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $20,280. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 18, 2002. (i) Action: To approve recommendation to: City Council Minutes 06-25-02 Page 10867 (1) Award Construction Contract for CIP 01-167, Street Improvements — Concrete Pavement Repair at Various Locations, to Damon Construction Co. in the amount of $79,720; (2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the construction contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; and (3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make changes in an amount not to exceed $20,280. (Edgerton absent) (k) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #25226 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 228 ARDMORE AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated June 18, 2002. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 02- 6208, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #25226 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 228 ARDMORE AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH,. CALIFORNIA." (Edgerton absent) (1) (m) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF A THREE-WAY STOP AT ARDMORE AVENUE AT 16TH STREET. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 17, 2002. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Yoon for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and • responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 02- 6209, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE INTERSECTION OF ARDMORE AVENUE AND 16TH STREET AS A THREE-WAY STOP CONTROL INTERSECTION," with direction to staff to 'install the stop signs in mid-August, a couple weeks before school starts. Motion Yoon, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT TO CITY MANAGER'S EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2003. Memorandum from Councilmember Reviczky and Councilmember Keegan dated June 20, 2002. City Council Minutes 06-25-02 Page 10868 • • Action: To approve amendment to City Manager's employment agreement effective January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2003, as recommended. (Edgerton absent) (n) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION FINDING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY DEMAND THAT THE AREA II PARKING PERMIT DISTRICT BE EXTENDED TO INCLUDE THE WEST SIDE OF CYPRESS AVENUE BETWEEN 11TH STREET AND PIER AVENUE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 19, 2002. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Keegan for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director Harold Williams presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to .adopt Resolution No. 02- 6210, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THE AREA II PERMIT DISTRICT BE EXTENDED TO INCLUDE THE WEST SIDE OF CYPRESS AVENUE BETWEEN 11TH STREET AND PIER AVENUE." Motion Keegan, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton. (o) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT WORK BY TORRES. CONSTRUCTION FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 01-628, COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENTS — COURTYARD; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION; AND, AUTHORIZE STAFF TO RELEASE PAYMENT TO TORRES CONSTRUCTION (10% RETAINED FOR 35 DAYS. FOLLOWING FILING OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION). Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold. Williams dated June 18, 2002. (p) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Accept work by Torres Construction for Project No. CIP 01-628, Community Center Improvements — Courtyard; (2) Authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion; and (3) Authorize staff to release payment to Torres Construction (10% retained " for 35 days following filing of Notice of Completion). (Edgerton absent) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION OF $23,997 FROM THE 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND AND AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER OF EXPENDITURES IN THE AMOUNT OF $23,997 FROM THE 150 GRANT FUND TO THE 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR City Council Minutes 06-25-02 Page 10869 (q) PROJECT NO. CIP 94-620, PIER RENOVATION— PHASE I. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 19, 2002. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Authorize the appropriation of $23,997 from the 301 Capital Improvement fund; and _ (2) Authorize the transfer of expenditures in the amount of $23,997 from the 150 Grant fund to the 301 Capital Improvement fund for Project No. CIP 94=620, Pier Renovation — Phase I; with the provision that staff contact Congresswoman Harman's office seeking assistance and obtain a definitive answer from her before sending the check. Motion Reviczky, second Yoon. The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE RENEWAL OF THE CITY'S PROPERTY INSURANCE AND AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE INSURANCE AS QUOTED THROUGH THE INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY AND PURCHASE EXCESS WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE IN JOINT PROGRAM WITH SELECTED CITIES AS PROPOSED BY WEXFORD INSURANCE AND PURSUE A POOLED SELF-INSURANCE OPTION THROUGH THE INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated June 20, 2002. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Renew the City's Property Insurance and Auto Physical Damage Insurance as quoted through the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority; and (2) Purchase excess workers' compensation insurance in joint program with selected cities as proposed by Wexford Insurance and pursue a pooled self-insurance option through the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority. (Edgerton absent) 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 2(1), (n) and (p) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. City Council Minutes 06-25-02 Page 10870 • Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. REVIEW DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ORDERING SAID DELINQUENT CHARGES BE PLACED ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILL AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. THE ASSESSMENT WOULD AFFECT ONLY THOSE PROPERTIES WITH REFUSE BILLS DELINQUENT AS OF MARCH 31, 2002. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 11, 2002. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 7:38 P.M. As no one cameforward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 7:38 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Adopt Resolution No. 02-6211, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ASSESSOR TO INCLUDE DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS FROM BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED AT THE SAME TIME AND IN. THE SAME MANNER AS COUNTY TAXES (168.85 - HERMOSA BCH DEL REFUSE BFI)"; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. 02-6212, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ASSESSOR TO INCLUDE DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS FROM CONSOLIDATED DISPOSAL SERVICE AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS COUNTY TAXES (168.85 - HERMOSA BCH DEL REFUSE CDS)." Motion Keegan, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton. At 7:40 P.M., the order of the agenda was suspended to go to item 6.b., followed by 8.a. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY PROVIDING EVALUATION OF ISSUES RAISED IN JACK JANKEN'S CORRESPONDENCE OF APRIL 22 AND City Council Minutes 06-25-02 Page 10871 APRIL 25, 2002. Two supplemental information items received June 25, 2002 from Jack Janken. City Attorney Jenkins, City Manager Burrell and Community Development Director Blumenfeld responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Jack Janken - Hermosa Beach, spoke to the issues of the retaining wall in question, a lack of enforcement of the Building Code by City staff, and a lack of responsiveness by City management to his complaints. Action: To receive and file the City Attorney's report. Motion Reviczky, second Yoon. The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton. Further Action: To direct staff to establish the following policies: (1) to immediately red -tag and stop work on any project that involves a life -safety issue, as is currently done, (2) to .allow three working days for the correction of a problem involving a nuisance complaint before red -tagging and stopping the project; and (3) to require both sides of a personnel issue --the complaint itself and the City's response --to be in writing. With Council concurrence, so ordered by Mayor Dunbabin. b. PROJECT NO. CIP 95-507, VALLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS, AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 17, 2002. Public Works Director Williams presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell and Community Resources Director Rooney also responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Pete Tucker - Hermosa Beach, said it seemed pointless to add sand; asked about the project completion date and about the donation of existing playground equipment. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Reject the bid from Ecology Construction, apparent low bidder; (2) Award the construction contract for Project No: CIP 95-507, Valley Park Improvements, to Terra -Cal Construction, Inc. of Baldwin Park, California, in the amount of $1,075,044; (3) Approve additional $196,810.20 for alternate bid items, amended to reduce the signage from two to one sign; City Council Minutes 06-25-02 Page 10872 • , (4) Approve estimated revenue of $235,214 ($178,000 from the Per Capita Grant and $57,214 from the Roberti Z'berg Grant) and appropriate the funds to this project; (5) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the construction contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; (6) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within the contingency of $130,000; and (7) Authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to execute said agreement upon approval as to form by the City Attorney. Motion Keegan, second Yoon. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote by Reviczky and the absence of Edgerton. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. DESIGNATE VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 3, 2002. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To designate Councilmember Yoon as the voting delegate and Councilmember Keegan as the alternate for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting on Saturday, October 5, 2002. Motion Reviczky, second Mayor Dunbabin. The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton. The meeting recessed at 8:10 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:35 P.M., at which time the order of the agenda returned to item 6.a. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Yoon spoke to the issue of resident concerns with regard to the 14th Street issue regarding a lack of space for a tree or bush due to the footings for the gate. City Manager Burrell .said it would be costly to move the large gate footings and suggested that staff meet with the neighbors instead to discuss the type of landscaping they might want and assist with the plant selection. Councilmember Yoon said he hoped to see results from the recent Council subcommittee meeting with merchants regarding downtown noise and spoke of the need to comply with the Code and enforce conditional use permits. City Council Minutes 06-25-02 Page 10873 Councilmember Yoon then commented on preparations for the 4th of July, and the neighborhood watch program (City Manager Burrell said that issue would come back to Council), and asked about a general status and timeline regarding undergrounding (City Manager Burrell said there were two more districts in the works). Councilmembers Keegan and Yoon moved to agendize for City Council review at the next meeting a possible change to the banner program to exclude participation by union groups. City Manager Burrell requested that the- Council add the Heart of the City case to tonight's closed session. Action: To add to the closed session the Redondo Beach Heart of the City case based on the findings that the issue arose after the posting of the agenda and required immediate action. Motion Reviczky, second Keegan. The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: a. Closed Session meeting held on May 28, 2002; and b. Closed Session meeting held on June 11, 2002. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) a. Name of Case: Gaines v. Wolcott, et al. Case Number: YC041272 b. Name of Case: Ryan v. City of Hermosa Beach, et al. Case Number: YC041782 c. Name of Case: Hallstein v. City of Hermosa Beach, et al. Case Number: CV 01-6202 RJK (Ex) d. Name of Case: Burd v. City of Hermosa Beach, et al. Case Number: CV 00-10016 CAS (CWx) City Council Minutes 06-25-02 Page 10874 e. Name of Case: Macpherson v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: BC172546 f. Name of Case: City of Hermosa Beach v. City of Redondo Beach Case Number: BS075570 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at the hour of 10:09 P.M. to a closed session. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION - The Closed Session convened at the hour of 10:10 P.M. At the hour of 10:52 P.M., the Closed Session adjourned to the Regular Meeting ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS - There were no decisions made requiring a public announcement. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned in memory of James Mance and Jack Cunningham on Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at the hour of 10:53 P.M. to the Adjourned Regular Meeting of: Monday, July 8, 2002, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. City Council Minutes 06-25-02 Page 10875 //c=yg.;-- MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Monday, July 8, 2002, at the hour of 7:20 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Pro Tern Edgerton ROLL CALL: Present: Edgerton, Keegan, Reviczky, Yoon, Mayor Dunbabin Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS - In response to a concern by Economic Development Review Committee Chairman Joe Mark about a problem with notice to Committee members and a Daily Breeze article that incorrectly stated the meeting was tomorrow night, Mayor Dunbabin suggested an initial discussion this evening with the scheduling of an additional meeting at a future date to allow greater participation. 1. PRESENTATION OF SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. COMMITTEE REPORT Chairman Joe Mark presented the Committee's report and touched on the major options that the report explored such as additional parking; cooperative efforts with property owners and incentives to encourage participation; a public transportation system to reduce the number of cars downtown; and the widening of sidewalks to make Hermosa Beach more pedestrian friendly. He cited examples used in other cities, such as having downtown employees ride to work in shuttles from remote parking areas. He asked for direction from the Council and said it would be helpful if the City began the momentum, noting that he realized all projects would have to fit into the City's budget. 2. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF PROJECTS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE The major topics discussed by the Council included: • Community meetings to get the public involved; • The concept of business improvement districts and assessment districts; • Tree planting, possibly with funds from an urban tree grant, as a trigger point with free trees and perhaps a citywide barbecue; • Welcome to Hermosa Beach signage; • The priority of making the City comfortable for residents, which in turn will make visitors comfortable; • The need for public transportation to reduce traffic, increase safety, encourage residents to frequent local businesses, and decrease the need for additional parking; • Encouraging retailers to keep sidewalks clean in front of their businesses; City Council Minutes 07-08-02 Page 10876 2a(2 • • Recognizing the "Block of the Month" on the City marquee; • The possible widening of some sidewalks to encourage a more pedestrian oriented community; • The establishment of remote parking and a determination of how far people are willing to walk; • The advantages of mixed use, especially with regard to shared parking; • The availability of MTA grants; • Medians on Pacific Coast Highway; • Incentives for residents to clean out their garages to reduce the need for on -street parking; and • The placement of notices in trash bills to keep the public informed. A subcommittee comprising of Councilmembers Keegan and Reviczky was formed to meet with Aviation Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway business owners starting in mid-September. CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Betty Ryan - Hermosa Beach, spoke of the effective use of plants in other cities and suggested a lot of landscaping to keep Hermosa Beach green; suggested local public transportation that was colorful and fun to ride; said the Committee was seeking direction from the Council; Cathy McCurdy - Hermosa Beach, spoke in support of a citywide program which could be called "Clean and Green"; suggested a public shuttle to tie the whole city together and encourage resident shopping downtown; Pete Tucker - Hermosa Beach, noted that the report had been done by residents; stressed the need to hold more meetings but also to take action soon to keep the enthusiasm alive; said plans for upper Pier Avenue had been designed but not implemented; and Ron Newman - Hermosa Beach, spoke of the need to determine the comfortable distance for people walk downtown after parking in remote areas; encouraged the establishment of a public transportation system to tie the community together and provide easy access to the downtown, get cars off the street, promote patronage of City businesses, provide transportation for students to go to school and the beach, possibly with storage areas for boogie boards, etc., and provide an opportunity for retailers to advertise on the shuttles to help underwrite the cost; suggested a citywide garage sale. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions and, as directed by the Council, said he would report back on items including parking in the alley City Council Minutes 07-08-02 Page 10877 • behind the businesses on the north side of upper Pier Avenue, mixed use development on Pacific Coast Highway and Aviation Boulevard, the planting of trees to keep the City green, parking at the Community Center, and medians on Pacific Coast Highway, in order of priority. ADJOURNMENT - The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Monday, July 8, 2002, at the hour of 9:05 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. City Clerk �� u .Dep ity Clerk City Council Minutes 07-08-02 Page 10878 VOUCHRE2 07/18/02 10:11 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS' PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 29741 07/18/02 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 001-1103 353,245.78 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 105-1103 6,528.26 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 109-1103 1,110.62 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 110-1103 31,130.50 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 117-1103 626.15 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 140-1103 807.40 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 145-1103 1,166.63 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 150-1103 76.79 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 152-1103 29.87 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 160-1103 7,791.27 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 301-1103 1,566.90 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 705-1103 2,735.51 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-02 715-1103 6,334.00 413,149.68 TOTAL CHECKS 413,149.68 VOUCHRE2 07/18/02 10:11 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER •FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 353,245.78 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 6,528.26 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 1,110.62 110 PARKING FUND 31,130.50 117 AB939 FUND 626.15 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 807.40 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,166.63 150 GRANTS FUND _ 76.79 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 29.87 160 SEWER FUND 7,791.27 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 1,566.90 705 INSURANCE FUND 2,735.51 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 6,334.00 TOTAL 413,149.68 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 07/18/02 17.36 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 29742 07/18/02 006290 AIR SOURCE INDUSTRIES 29743 07/18/02 006421 ALL STAR FIRE EQUIPMENT 29744 07/18/02 008869 HEATHER H. ALLEY 29745 07/18/02 005628 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC 29746 07/18/02 29747 07/18/02 29748 07/18/02 29749 07/18/02 008219 AON RISK SERVICES . 009500 AT&T 011632 ROSS BALLING 005167 DAVE BEEMAN 29750 07/18/02 004277 OLIN BELL 29751 07/18/02 008937 DAVID BIZUB 29752 07/18/02 010293 LAURA BLANK 29753 07/18/02 006409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS 29754 07/18/02 006461 CHRIS BOWSHER 29755 07/18/02 011620 OFFICER GEORGE BRUNN 29756 07/18/02 007109 ADAM BURT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS. • ITEM DESCRIPTION HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FEE AXE REPLACEMENT HEAD INSTRUCTOR FEE/SURF CAMP 02 INSTRUCTOR FEE/SURF CAMP 2002 APA MEMBERSHIP/7/01/02-6/30/03 APA MEMBERSHIP/7/1/02-6/30/03 AUTO POLICY 7/01/02-7/01/03 LONG DISTANCE SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS BVC-03 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS BVL -02 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS BVL -02 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS MC -03 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS MC -01 REPLACE CK#14923 LOST IN MAIL INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS PB -01 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS PB -01 TOW ASPHALT REPLACE2 CKS LOST IN MAIL REIMB. FOR POLICE SHIRT INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS MC -04 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS AT -08 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS FT -01 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS FT -02 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS YT -19 29757 07/18/02. 000034 BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORPOR DOM VIOLENCE INFO CARDS FIELD INTERVIEW CARDS 29758 07/18/02 003372 CA EMS PERSONNEL FUND 29759 07/18/02 011138 PARAMEDIC RENEWAL / A. BUSH CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE 0 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL/D.POWERS 29760 07/18/02 000014 CHAMPION CHEVROLET 29761 07/18/02 000153 CINTAS CORPORATION REFUND OF CREDIT. TAKEN UNIFORM RENTAL SUPPLIES UNIFORM RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2201-4309 001-2201-5401 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4101-4315 001-4101-4315 705-1210-4201 001-2101-4304 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-2111 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-3104-4309 001-2111 001-2101-4187, 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 150-2110-4309 001-2101-4305 001-2201-4315 001-2201-4315 715-4206-4311 001-4202-4187 001-4204-4309 001-4202-4187 PAGE 1 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 140.80 140.80 118.28 118.28 700.00 350.00 1,050.00 256.00 190.00 446.00 12,042.00 12,042.00 247.30 247.30 315.00 315.00 280.00 70.00 350.00 231.00 577.50 808.50 50.00 50.00 70.00 140.00 210.00 69.56 69.56 100.00 100.00 30.31 30.31 231.00 239.40 1,388.10 17.50 347.20 2,223.20 88.77 107.82 196.59 130.00 130.00 55.00 55.00 50.55 50.55 89.99 8.66 90.99 VOUCHRE2 07/18/02 17:36 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 29762 07/18/02 011663 CITY OF PHOENIX 29763 07/18/02 005595 COACH USA 29764 07/18/02 004928 COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FO 29765 07/18/02 005970 DENNIS' COLLINS 29766 07/18/02 009614 CONTINENTAL MAPPING SER 29767 07/18/02 008662 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 29768 07/18/02 010364 COUNTY OF ORANGE 29769 07/18/02 002971 JIM CUBBERLEY 29770 07/18/02 008855 D & D DISPOSAL, INC. 29771 07/18/02 005691 DAL -TILE 29772 07/18/02 004689 DATA TICKET, INC. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SHIRTS UNIFORM RENTAL SUPPLIES UNIFORM RENTAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES ADULT EXCURSION/L.A. GAME YOUTH EXCURSION/LEEWAY SAILING LIABILITY CLAIMS REIMB. 06/02 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS SV -05 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS SV -06 300' NOTICING PARAMEDIC ACCREDITATION FIREARMS LASER TRAINING INSTRUCTOR PYMNT #MC-05&AS-01 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS MC -02 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS AS -01 ANIMAL DISPOSAL/JUNE PLANTER BOXES REPAIR DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/JUNE '02 29773 07/18/02 010772 DELL COMPUTER CORPORATI DELL 1702FP MONITOR 29774 07/18/02 000154 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CA JUNE 02 SHELTER SERVICES 29775 07/18/02 000049 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVAT STRONG MOTION MAPPING FEE 29776 07/18/02 000267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT HWY MAINTENANCE/APRIL 02 29777 07/18/02 008242 LYNDA DESLANDES 29778 07/18/02 011659 EL CAMINO POLICE DEPT. 29779 07/18/02 011665 ELLIS, SUE 29780 07/18/02 010039 EMERGENCY SPEC.PHYS 29781 07/18/02 005509 RICK ESCALANTE INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS RG -04 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4204-4309 001-4202-4187 001-4202-4187 001-4204-4309 001-4202-4187 001-4204-4309 001-2201-4317 145-3409-4201 145-3409-4201 705-1209-4324 001-4601.-4221 001-4601-4221' 001-4101-4201 001-2201-4315 001-2101-4317 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 110-3302-4201 001-6101-4309 110-1204-4201 715-1206-5401 110-3302-4251 001-3204 105-2601-4251 001-4601-4221 PRE-EMPLOYMENT FINGERPRINTING 001-1203-4201 CLASS REFUND FIRST AID 001-2111 001-1203-4320 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS AT -24 001-4601-4221 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS AT -25 001-4601-4221 ITEM AMOUNT PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 8.87 95.44 90.99 8.87 90.99 8.87 493.67 416.49 416.49 406.18 812.35 1,218.53 5,298.54 5,298.54 950.60 105.00 1,055.60 1,223.00 1,223.00 125.00 125.00 151.00 - 151.00 931.00 423.50 315.00 1,669.50 264.00 264.00 371.03 371.03 243.74 243.74 756.67 756.67 100.16 100.16 700.58 700.58 3,363.60 3,363.60 962.50• 962.50 150.00 150.00 58.00 58.00 85.00 85.00 195.50 195.50 391.00 VOUCHRE2 07/18/02 17:36 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 29782 07/18/02 009529 FAILSAFE TESTING 29783 07/18/02 000814. GARRETT CONSTRUCTION 29784 07/18/02 011668 GENERALIS, CHRIS 29785 07/18/02 011662 GEORGE BEST 29786 07/18/02 010836 GRAINGER 29787 07/18/02 002336 MARCIA HALL 29788 07/18/02 011483 ALEXANDER W. HAY III 29789 07/18/02 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION AERIAL LADDER ANNUAL INSPECT. DOOR REPLACEMENT/CITY. YARD CLASS REFUND WORK GUARANTEE REFUND.# 3096 SUPPLIES REIMB. MICROWAVE & FRIDGE INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS SV -09 5/2/02-6/4/02 PLAN CK CONSULT. 29790 07/18/02 004108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SER WORKERS COMP CLAIMS 7/12/02 29791 07/18/02 005824 PENNY HENDRICKS 29792 07/18/02 010041 IACP MEMBERSHIP 29793 07/18/02 011001 ICRMA 29794 07/18/02 010820 JENKINS & HOGIN,LLP 29795 07/18/02 010334 GLENN JENSEN RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES/LAVIN 2002/2003 PROPERTY INSURANCE GENERAL 6/3/02-6/28/02 STOP OIL 6/20/02-6/28/02 LAND USE 6/3/02-6/27/02 TYCOM 6/3/02-6/18/02 INSTRUCTOR FEE/SURF CAMP 02 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS SCS -01 29796 07/18/02 006864 JOSEPH METAL CRAFTERS & BRAKETS INSTALL./HOCKEY RINK 29797 07/18/02 006293 KINKO'S INC. BEACH BASH EVENT MEMOS BANNERS FLYERS PLAN COPIES 4TH. OF JULY FLYERS 29798 07/18/02 000999 L.A. CO DEPT. OF PUBLIC CITYWIDE STRIPING / MAY 02 29799 07/18/02 000151 L.A. CO SHERIFF'S OEPAR PRISONER BOOKING FEES 29800 07/18/02 010932 LEXIS NEXIS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 6/02-5/03 29801 07/18/02 008445 LITTLE CO OF MARY HOSPI FIRST AID FOR G. DALE PATIENT SERVICES 29802 07/18/02 011630 LOS ANGELES AREA FIRE C REGISTRATION/TINGLEY ACCOUNT NUMBER 715=2201-4251 001-4204-4201 001-2111 001-2110 001-4202-5401 110-1204-5401 001-4601-4221 001-4201-4201 705-1217-4324 a 001-2111 - 001-2101-4317 705-1209-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-2114 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 125-8532-4201 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4305. 160-8411-4201 001-2101-4305 001-3104-4251 001-2101-4251 001-1121-4201 001-1203-4320 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4317 PAGE 3 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 175.00 175.00 4,087.00 4,087.00 120.00 120.00 1,600.00 ,1,600.00 324.22 324.22 292.25 292.25 1,039.50 1,039.50 2,487.01 2,487.01 16,785.02 16,785.02 500.00 500.00 100.00 100.00 136,698.00 136,698.00 3,192.00 312.00 1,043.00 2,010.00 6,557.00 500.00 375.00 875.00 650.00 650.00. 25.98 332.98 194.85 21.76 19.49 595.06 4,421.28 4,421.28 291.68 291.68 750.00 750.00 84.00 140.00 224.00 325.00 325.00 • VOUCHRE2 07/18/02 17:36 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 29803 07/18/02 011661 LYNETTE INGRAHAM 29804 07/18/02 011629 METRO PLAZA HOTEL 29805 07/18/02 011660 MIDDLESEX COUNTY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION REFUND ON CITATION OVERPAYMENT LODGING/OSEKOWSKY 7/22-7/26/02 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REIMB. 29806 07/18/02 008457 MINOLTA -BUSINESS SYSTEM MAY 02 COPIER SERVICE MAY 02 COPIER SERVICE MAY 02 COPIER SERVICE MAY 02 COPIER SERVICE MAY 02 COPIER SERVICE 29807 07/18/02 011669 MOLNAR, EVA 29808 07/18/02 009854 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 29809 07/18/02 011664 NO FRIENDS, ROSS 1 29810 07/18/02 011036 NOBEST, INC. 29811 07/18/02 004356 SHELDON OSEKOWSKY CLASS REFUND JUNE 02 PHONE SERVICE RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND RELEASE RETENTION RELEASE RETENTION RELEASE RETENTION PER DIEM (7/22-7/26/02) 29812 07/18/02 009513 PACIFIC COAST CONSTRUCT REINSTALL 1" COPPER LINE 29813 07/18/02 011640 DENISE PALMIERI INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS SCS -01 29814 07/18/02 007158 PEEK TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET RENTAL 29815 07/18/02 002980 POWER MAINTENANCE CORPO SERVICE AGREEMENT JUL02-4UL04 SERVICE AGREEMENT JUL02-JUL04 SERVICE AGREEMENT JUL02-JUL04 29816 07/18/02 008202 DARRYL POWERS 29817 07/18/02 009617 JAY VINCENT RAY REIMB. TRAVEL EXPENSES INSTRUCTOR PYMNT #CSC-01&TS-01 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS TS -01 29818 07/18/02 008871 LYN RILEY, EMS EDUCATIO REPLACE CK# 19376 LOST IN MAIL 29819 07/18/02 007658 MARGARITA ROJAS 29820 07/18/02 008575 ROM CORPORATION 29821 07/18/02 003353 S.B.C.U. VISA INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS FD -05 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS FD -05 REFUND/SOUND TECHNICIAN FEES RAIL ASSEMBLY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EXPENSES OFFICE EXPENSES 29822 07/18/02 007858 SAFETY KLEEN PART CLEANER SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-3302 001-2201-4317 001-3840 001-1208-4201 001-4601-4201 001-1208-4201 001-2201-4201 110-3302-4201 001-2111 001-2101-4304 001-2111 120-8171-4201 150-8171-4201 301-8171-4201 001-2201-4317 301-8172-4201 001-4601-4221 001-3104-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-1550 001-2201-4317 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-2201-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-2111 715-2201-4311 001-1201-4317 001-1101-4317 ITEM AMOUNT 60.00 269.04 325.60 197.72 67.50 103.48 67.50 13.52 63.00 985.31 100.00 1,835.80 10,285.24 11,000.00 250.00 1,000.00 175.00 600.00 1,536.00 1,024.00 2,560.00 72.27 496.80 1,016.20 1,250.00 28.00 28.00 56.00 162.59 22.16 31.45 715-4206-4201 164.70 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 60.00 269.04 325.60 449.72 63.00 985.31 100.00 23,121.04 250.00 1,000.00 175.00 600.00 5,120.00 72.27 1,513.00 1,250.00 112.00 162.59 53.61 164.70 VOUCHRE2 07/18/02 17:36 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 29823 07/18/02 009139 SECURED STORAGE 29824 07/18/02 009784 SHIFT CALENDARS, INC. 29825 07/18/02 009656 SHRED IT CALIFORNIA 29826 07/18/02 009811 WILLIAM,E. SIGLER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION STORAGE CHARGES/2ND. QRTR 02 SHIFT CALENDARS/YEAR 2003 DESTRUCTION SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS, BVL -02 29827 07/18/02 000114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CREDIT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 29828 07/18/02 009737 LESLIE SOLYMOSI BEE SERVICE BEE SERVICE 29829 07/18/02 000113 SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUI CHARGE FIRE EXTINGUISHER 29830 07/18/02 010532 SOUTH BAY FORD MASTER CYLINDER HEATER HOSE REPAIR HOSE/BELT REPAIRS AIR BYPASS & EGR VALVE BYPASS GSKS BRAKE ABS MODULE 29831 07/18/02 011317 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA YOU THEATER TCKTS SLD 6/28-29/02 29832 07/18/02 000146 SPARKLETTS 29833 07/18/02 010232 SPICERS PAPER,INC. 29834 07/18/02 009814 SPORTS -N -ACTION 29835 07/18/02 011477 DENISE STEELE WATER RECYCLED PAPER. 12 RSC DIAMOND SOFTBALLS INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS WDW-01 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS AB -03 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS AB -05 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS LB -05 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS LB -05 INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS LB -05 29836 07/18/02 010158 STEVENS-GARLAND ASSOCIA CITY TRAFFIC ENG./APR-MAY 02 29837 07/18/02 011667 STROYKE, NOELLE 29838 07/18/02 011670 SWORD, JACK CLASS REFUND DEPOSIT REFUND 29839. 07/18/02 010965 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. BUSINESS LIC. OVERPAY REFUND 29840 07/18/02 008356 VIP KAWASAKI HEADLIGHT / HELMET LOCK • ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1121-4201 001-2201-4305 001-2101-4201 001-4601-4221 001-2101-4306 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4308 110-3302-4309 001-4204-4309 110-3302-4201 110-3302-4201 001-2201-4309 715-2201-4311 715-2101-4311 715-4201-4311 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 715-2201-4311 001-4601-4221 001-2201-4305 001-1208-4305 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-3104-4201 001-2111 001-2111 001-3115 715-2101-4311 ITEM AMOUNT 48.00 305.51 85.00 350.00 135.24 55.67 2.80- 81.70 102.69 85.00 85.00 16.00 131.03- 28.68 77.02 138.30 2.21 326.87 5,390.70 1.75 930.08 454.00 112.00 140.00 224.00 56.00 70.00 28.00 3,750.00 78.00 100.00 766.57 26.79 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 48.00 305.51 85.00 350.00 372.50 170.00 16.00 442.05 5,390.70 • 1.75 930.08 454.00 630.00 3,750.00 78.00 100.00 766.57 26.79 VOUCHRE2 07/18/02 17:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 6 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME . DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 29841 07/18/02 011666 WARTER, JANIS CLASS REFUND 001-2111 29842 07/18/02 007106 JENNIFER YAMANE INSTRUCTOR PYMNT CLASS BJ -04 001-4601-4221 29843 07/18/02 011671 eKNOWLEDGE GROUP, INC. CR -ROM TRAINING COURSE 001-1203-4317 75.00 63.00 279.00 75.00 63.00 279.00 TOTAL. CHECKS 266,808.55 VOUCHRE2 07/18/02 17:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 63,517.57 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 3,363.60 110 PARKING FUND 1,225.37 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 1,835.80 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 650.00 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,218.53 150 GRANTS FUND 10,374.01 160 SEWER FUND 21.76 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 12,000.00 705 INSURANCE FUND 170,823.56 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,778.35 TOTAL 266,808.55 PAGE 7 VOUCHRE2 07/22/02 •14:55 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 29844 07/22/02 011672 BRIAN T. MC NALLY PHOTOGRAPHS/COUNCIL/CLRK/TREAS 001-1101-4305 592.00 592.00 TOTAL CHECKS 592.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/22/02 14:55 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND TOTAL AMOUNT 592.00. 592.00 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 07/25/02 17:37 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE • VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 29845 07/25/02 011684 LYNNE BOWMAN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER • FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CITATION REFUND #0800047631 29846 07/25/02 000029 A-1 COAST SANITATION, I LIGHT TOWERS RENTED/JULY 4TH 29847 07/25/02 000152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE MATS & SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/6/02 MAT & SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/6/02 SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/6/02 MATS/SHOP TOWEL SERVICES/6/02 MATS CLEANED/JUNE 2002 MATS CLEANED/6/02 MATS CLEANED/JUNE 2002 SHOP TOWEL SERVICES/6/02 MAT & SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/6/02 MAT SERVICE/JUNE 2002 MAT SERVICE/JUNE 2002 MATS CLEANED/JUNE 2002 29848 07/25/02 009836 MARGUERITE L. BAIERSKI INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/GY-01 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/GY-02 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/GY-03 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/TG-01 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/TG-03 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/GY-01 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/GY-02 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/GY-03 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/TG-01 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/TG-02 29849 07/25/02 005167 DAVE BEEMAN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SFL-02 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SFL-03 29850 07/25/02 004277 OLIN BELL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/MC-06 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/MC-08 29851 07/25/02 011673 DAVID BLANK INSTRUCTOR/PB-01 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/JULY 02 . 29852 07/25/02 006409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS ASPHALT PURCHASE/JULY 02 29853 07/25/02 008522 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL INC. MEDICAL SUPPLIES 29854 07/25/02 011678 CRAIG BORDON 29855 07/25/02 008344 SHANE BOUMA 29856 07/25/02 011683 MICHAEL BRANT 29857 07/25/02 010171 BUDGET BLINDS 29858 07/25/02 000413 BUILDING NEWS, INC. WORK GUARANTEE REFUND #2675 ROLLER HOCKEY REFEREE/5/1-30 CITATION REFUND # 0100041929 MINI BLINDS/CHIEF'S OFFICE ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-3302 109-3301-4201 001-3104-4309 001-2201-4309 715-4206-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 715-4206-4309 001-2201-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-3104-4309 001-2201-4309 001-2110 001-4601-4221 110-3302 001-2101-4305 2000 GREENBOOK/CONSTRUCTION 001-4202-4305 ITEM AMOUNT 30.00 200.68 60.51 44.39 33.86 60.51 59.00 15.83 78.77 36.41 50.49 59.00 16.83 78.77 84.00 210.00 126.00 39.20 78.40 42.00 105.00 63.00 19.60 39.20 420.00 980.00 423.50 462.00 140.00 70.00 120.63 141.25 1,600.00 187.50 30.00 193.77 72.90 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 30.00 200.68 594.37 806.40 1,400.00 885.50 210.00 120.63 141.25 1,600.00 187.50 30.00 193.77 72.90 VOUCHRE2 07/25/02 17:37 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 29859 07/25/02 011686 NICOLE BURDINE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CITATION REFUND #0400041957 29860 07/25/02 000480 CA POLICE CHIEFS ASSOC 2002-03 MEMBERSHIP DUES/LAVIN 29861 07/25/02 010612 CALIF. FIRE CHIEFS ASSO ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES/02/03 29862 07/25/02 010114 CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS REGISTRATION/RUSSELL TINGLEY 29863 07/25/02 011679 JEAN CASTALDO 29864 07/25/02 011674 LINDA CIRINCOINE 29865 07/25/02 005595 COACH USA 29866 07/25/02 002173 NANCY COOK 29867 07/25/02 011682 SIERRA COOKE 29868 07/25/02 000041 VIKI COPELAND 29869. 07/25/02 007809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 29870 07/25/02 011688 JOHN DECEW 29871 07/25/02 000604 DIVE 14, SURF 29872 07/25/02 004394 DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPL CLASS REFUND RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND TRANSPORTATION/SKATE ZONE/7/02 TRANSPORTATION/IRVINE PARK TRANSPORTATION/L.A. Z00/7/02 REIMBURSE FOR GLASSES CLASS REFUND REIMBURSE/OFFICE REFRIGERATOR OFFICE SUPPLIES CITATION REFUND HYDRO TANK/JUNE 2002 BATTERIES FOR PARKING METERS BATTERIES/PARKING METERS/7/02 BATTERIES/PARKING METERS/7/02 BATTERIES/PARKING METERS/7/02 29873 07/25/02 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. EXPRESS MAIL/JUNE 2002 29874 07/25/02 010709 FIRE MASTER .FIRE ALARM SECURITY CHECK 29875 07/25/02 009996 FUTURE INDUSTRIAL TECHN BACKSAFE TRAINING/JUNE 2002 29876 07/25/02 010239 JENNIFER GERVAIS 29877 07/25/02 011680 STEWART GILBERT 29878 07/25/02 011578 JERRY GOMEZ THEATER TECHNICIAN CLASS REFUND REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSES/6/02 29879 07/25/02 010740 HAZELRIGG RISK MANAGEME CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION/1ST QRT 29880 07/25/02 008576 HEC RAMSEY ENTERPRISES BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATIONS ONE DAY EVENT PASSES PARKING CITATION POSTCARDS 13 ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-3302 001-2101-4315 001-2201-4315 001-2201-4317 001-2111 001=2111 145-3409-4201 145-3409-4201 145-3409-4201 001-2101-4187 001-2111 001-1202-5401 001-1208-4305 110-3302 001-2201-4309 110-3302-4309 110-3302-4309 110-3302-4309 110-3302-4309 001-1203-4305 001-4204-4321 705-1217-4317 001-4601-4201 001-2111 001-2201-4317 705-1217-4201 110-1204-4305 110-1204-4305 110-1204-4305 PAGE 2 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 30.00 30.00 230.00 230.00 150.00 150.00 295.00 295.00 57.00 57.00 30.00 30.00 875.65 406.18 489.56 1,771.39 181.00 181.00 20.00 20.00 155.87 155.87 34.39 34.39 5.00 5.00 25.00 25.00 145.49 145.49 145.49 145.49 27.06 357.42 2,254.08 46.00 75.00 193.79 6,500.00 581.96 27.06 357.42 2,254.08 46.00 75.00 193.79 6,500.00 212.40 439.71 729.33 1,381.44 VOUCHRE2 07/25/02 17:37 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 29881 07/25/02 003432 HOME DEPOT/GECF 29882 07/25/02 009130 DENNIS HRBOKA 29883 07/25/02 011001 ICRMA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER . FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DAY CAMP SUPPLIES/JUNE 2002 DOOR & PLYWOOD MAINT SUPPLIES/MAY 02 MAINT SUPPLIES/MAY 02 MAINT MATERIALS/JARVIS QUICK SHADE CANOPIES MAINT MATERIALS/COMMUNITY CRT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/JUNE 02 PROGRAM SUPPLIES/JUNE 02 SCREWS/DRILL BIT/CC LIGHT PROJ INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/IBL-01 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/FB-01 EXCESS WORKER'S COMP/99/00 EXCESS WORKER'S COMP/00/01 29884 07/25/02 011237 IDYLL MOUNTAIN INTERNET WEB PAGE SERVICES/JUNE 2002 WEB PAGE SERVICE/JULY 2002 29885 07/25/02- 011689- PAUL KIM CITATIONREFUND 29886 07/25/02 007859 L.A. CO METRO TRANS AUT BUS PASS SALES/JULY 02 29887 07/25/02 007136 THE LAKES AT EL SEGUNDO INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/BG-01 29888 07/25/02 004534 LASER IMAGING 29889 07/25/02 000167 LEARNED LUMBER PRINTER SUPPLIES/JULY 2002 MOLDING/JUNE 2002 29890 07/25/02 005129 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMOR MEMBERSHIP DUES 7/1/02-6/30/03 29891 07/25/02 008445 LITTLE CO OF MARY HOSPI EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS/JUNE 02 . 29892 07/25/02 010914 LOS ANGELES ZOO 29893 07/25/02 010045 MAIN STREET TOURS 29894 07/25/02 011687 LUCILLE M MCCARTIN 29895 07/25/02 004138 KENNETH A. MEERSAND 29896 07/25/02 005848 DIANE MILLER 29897 07/25/02 011685 JUAN M MONTOYA 29898 07/25/02 011309 DANA MORRIS 29899 07/25/02 010399 MSA EXCURSION/JULY 10,2002 TRANSPORTATION/REAGAN LIBRARY TRANSPORTATION/REAGAN LIBARY CITTION REFUND/ADMIN•HEARING EXPENSE REIMBURSE/LUNCHEON EXCURSION REFUND CITATION REFUND#0100042724 RENTAL•DEPOSIT REFUND DEPOSIT REFUND . MEMBERSHIP/WILLIAMS/FLAHERTY 1N ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4601-4308 001-4204-4309 001-6101-4309 105-2601-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4601-5401 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 001-4601-4308 105-2601-4309 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 705-1217-4201 705=1217-4201 715-1206-4201 715-1206-4201 1-10-3302 145-3403-4251 001-4601-4221 715-1206-4309 105-2601-4309 001-1203-4317 001-1203-4320 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4201 145-3409-4201 110-3302 001-2101-4317 001-2111 110-3302 001-2111 001-211.1. 001-4202-4315 ITEM AMOUNT 334.80 149.89 70.12 103.87 178.60 365.89 363.46 221.65 454.44 26.79 612.50 526.75 472.00 541'.00 90.00 40.00 30.00 48.00 217.40 504.98 2.60 2,100.00 490.00 153.75 388.00 515.00 330.00 177.00 20.00 60.00 104.99 412.50 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 2,269.51 1,139.25 1,013.00 130.00 30.00 48.00 217.40 504.98 2.60 2,100.00 490.00 153.75 903.00 330.00 177.00 20.00 60.00 517.49 85.00 85.00 VOUCHRE2 07/25/02 17:37 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 29900 07/25/02 011690 MICHELLE MYERS 29901 07/25/02 011681 LORAINE NAMANNY 29902 07/25/02 011676 NEXTEL 29903 07/25/02 001649 PACIFIC SALES 29904 07/25/02 008768 QUADRANT SYSTEMS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER . FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING CLASS REFUND CELL PHONE USAGE/MAY 2002 CELL PHONE USAGE/JUNE 02 CELL PHONE USAGE/JUNE 02 CELL PHONE USAGE/MAY 02 CELL PHONE USAGE/MAY 02 MICROWAVE OVENS/JAIL ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT 02-03 29905 07/25/02 005379 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS LEGAL RE: COMPACT CITY/MAY 02 LEGAL RE: FAA/MAY 2002 LEGAL RE:FAA/JUNE 02 29906 07/25/02 011049 SHAKESPEARE BY THE SEA SHAKESPEARE BY THE SEA/7/25/02 29907 07/25/02 008220 KATHLEEN SHANNON CITATION REFUND/0300031388 CITATION REFUND/0600044818 29908 07/25/02 009656 SHRED IT CALIFORNIA DESTRUCTION SERVICES/JULY 02 29909 07/25/02 009353 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SH-01 29910 07/25/02 010532 SOUTH BAY FORD AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 2002 AUTO MAINT/JUNE 2002 29911 07/25/02 000118 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COU CITATION SUR CHARGES/MAY 02 29912 07/25/02 008812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBL SIREN REPLACED/JUNE 2002 29913 07/25/02 000018 SOUTH BAY WELDERS 29914 07/25/02 010347 STANDARD REGISTER WELDING SUPPLIES ENCODER TAPE • ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-3302 001-2111 001-2201-4304 001-4601-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 001-4202-4304 001-2101-4305 715-1206-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-4601-4201 110-3302 110-3302 001-2101-4201 001-4601-4221 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 110-3302 715-2101-4311 715-4206-4309 001-1141-4305 29915 07/25/02 009199 STONEBRIDGE PRODUCTIONS ENTERTAINMENT/SUNSET CONCERTS 001-4601-4201 29916 07/25/02 000806 SUN BADGE COMPANY 29917 07/25/02 000124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY FLAT BADGES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/7/02 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN 29918 07/25/02 010785 UNITED STORM WATER, INC STORM DRAIN SCREEN COVER 29919 07/25/02 010500 XO COMMUNICATIONS 29920 07/25/02 001206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 29921 07/25/02 011671 eKNOWLEDGE GROUP, INC. WEB HOSTING/JULY 02 SIGNS MADE/JULY 02 REFUND WORK GUARANTEE #2852. 13 001-2201-4187 160-3102-4309 001-2021 001-2022 160-3102-4201 715-1206-4201 . 001-3104-4309 001-2110 ITEM AMOUNT 330.00 80.00 80.00 189.52 39.02 534.10 38.81 425.50 1,226.95 274.96 274.96 700.00 700.00 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 330.00 19.50 223.75 50.50 293.75 600.00 600.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 102.00 102.00 1,067.20 1,067.20 144.04 186.00 16,754.50 95.00 22.50 136.82 10,000.00 120.94 215.18 4.39 4.39- 1,079.79 124.00 372.38 1,600.00 330.04 16,754.50 95.00 22.50 136.82 10,000.00 120.94 215.18 1,079.79 124.00 372.38 1,600.00 i TOTAL CHECKS 66,691.39 VOUCHRE2 07/25/02 17:37 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 30,736.21 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 718.37 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 200.68 110 PARKING FUND 19,662.90 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 2,334.39 160 SEWER FUND 1,294.97 705 INSURANCE FUND 9,767.08 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,976.79 TOTAL 66,691.39 1! PAGE 5 VOUCHRE2 08/01/02 16:40 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/_ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 29922 08/01/02 011437 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIAL A TAXI SERVICE/JUNE 2002 145-3404-4201 2,268.00 2,268.00 29923 08/01/02 011705 KAYLA AFNER CLASS REFUND 001-2111 100.00 100.00 29924 08/01/02 006827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL CRSSG GD SERV/71-12 001-2101-4201 527.10 527.10 29925 08/01/02 009620 HEATHER. ALLEY INSTRUCTOR/SURF CAMP/CSC-05 001-4601-4221 945.00 945.00 29926 08/01/02 011701 AMSTERDAM PRINTING MAILING LABELS 001-2201-4305 32.42 32.42 29927 08/01/02 011700 CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS TUITION/GLEN MAPLES 110-3302-4317 55.00 55.00 29928 08/01/02 011673 DAVID BLANK INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/PB-02 001-4601-4221 168.00 168.00 29929 08/01/02 007109 ADAM BURT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/MC-10 001-4601-4221 462.00 462.00 29930 08/01/02 011695 KEVIN CAMPBELL CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING 110-3302 30.00 30.00 P 29931 08/01/02 000986 EDWARD L. CHESSON REIMB.FOR EMT -I CERTIF/CHESSON 001-2201-4315 50.00 50.00 29932 08/01/02 005595 COACH USA YOUTH EXCURSION TRANSPORT 145-3409-4201875.65 __ 875.65 29933 08/01/02 005970 DENNIS COLLINS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SV-01 001-4601-4221 261.34 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SV-01 001-4601-4221 520.00 781.34 29934 08/01/02 007809 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES # 7798/JUNE 02 001-1208-4305 260.07 .260.07 29935 08/01/02 007700 CPRS MEMBERSHIP DUES/LISA LYNN 001-4601-4315 130.00 130.00 29936 08/01/02 000642 THE DAILY BREEZE EMPLOYMENT AD/JUNE 2002 001-1203-4201 230.28 230.28 29937 08/01/02 008242 LYNDA DESLANDES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/RG-01 001-4601-4221 315.00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/RG-02 001-4601-4221 385.00 700.00 29938 08/01/02 011702 CARLOS DIAZ CLASS REFUND 001-2111 90.00 \ 90.00 29939 08/01/02 004394 DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPL BATTERIES 110-3302-4309 145.49 BATTERIES 110-3302-4309 145.49 BATTERIES 110-3302-4309 145.49 436.47 29940 08/01/02 010909 DIVERSIFIED RISK INSURA TULIP INSURANCE/JUNE 02 001-3897 764.41 764.41 29941 08/01/02 000181 EASY READER LEGAL ADS/JUNE 2002 001-1121-4323 1,460.12 1,460.12 29942 08/01/02 006829 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH SERVICES/4/02-6/02 001-2101-4251 • DISPATCH SERVICES/4/02-6/02 110-3302-4251 DISPATCH SERVICES/4/02-6/02 001-2201-4251 29943 08/01/02 008661 EMERG SPEC PHYS MEDICAL PATIENT SERVICES/KHACHI .001-2101-4201 29944 08/01/02 011703 PAM EMERY CLASS REFUND 001-2111 ? 85,201.00 10,650.00 10,650.00 106,501.00 135.00 135.00 43.00 43.00 r• VOUCHRE2. 08/01/02 16:40 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 29945 08/01/02 001294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICE JANITORIAL SERV/JAIL/6/02 JANITORIAL SERV/POLICE/6/02 JANITORIAL SERV/CITY HALL/6/02 JANITORIAL SERV/GSA/JUNE 2002 JANITORIAL SERV/CLARK/6/02 JANITORIAL SERV/COMM CRT/6/02 JANITORAL SERV/CITY YARD/6/02 JANITORIAL SERV/JUNE 2002 JANITORIAL SERVICES/SO PK/6/02 29946 08/01/02 011694 KATHLEEN FAY WORK GUARANTEE REFUND/# 10984 29947 08/01/02 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. EXPRESS MAIL/JUNE 02 EXPRESS MAIL/JUNE 02-TYCOM EXPRESS MAIL/JUNE 02 29948 08/01/02 011691 FLAG HOUSE FURNITURE EX MAIL CART PURCHASE 29949 08/01/02 011707 FREEZE FRAME VIDEO DIGITAL CAMERA SYSTEM/JAIL 29950 08/01/02 011704 MOLLY GEE CLASS REFUND 29951 08/01/02 005125 MARIA GHASSEMI PETTY CA REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/JUNE 02 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/JUNE 02 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/JUNE 02 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/JUNE 02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE/7/02 29952 08/01/02 006797 DAWN GNADT 29953 08/01/02, 011696 KELLY LEILANI GRADY 29954 08/01/02 011693 GTO HERMOSA LLC INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/DZ-01 CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING WORK GUARANTEE REFUND #10773 29955 08/01/02 011697 MARILYN HALE REFUND CITATION LATE FEE 29956 08/01/02 011483 ALEXANDER W. HAY III INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/MC-09 29957 .08/01/02. 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. TEMP.BLDG.INSPECT/7f1-15/2002 19 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4291 001-4204-4201 001-2110 150-8630-4201 001-2114 001-4601-4305 001-1208-4305 153-2106-5402 001-2111 001-1203-4305 715-2201-4310 001-4601-4308 001-1121-4305 001-4101-4305 001-2101-4317 001-2101-4309 001-1101-4305 001-4601-4305 001-4101-4305 001-4204-4309 001-4202-4317 001-1201-4317 001-2201-4309 715-1206-4309 001-1203-4305 001-2201-4309 001-4601-4221 110-3302 001-2110 110-3302 001-4601-4221 001-4201-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 750.00 1,200.00 1,171.26 290.00 365.00 3,750.00 325.00 195.00 55.00 1,600.00 49.52 19.63 15.63 218.55 6,172.39 90.00 11.58 73.62 80.41 32.46 63.41 36.00 96.87 2.36 36.38 4.33 75.72 14.00 20.00 103.93 232.52 13.05 9.00 1,729.00 330.00 1,600.00 30.00 423.50 2,640.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 8,101.26 1,600.00 84.78 218.55 6,172.39 90.00 905.64 1,729.00 330.00 1,600.00 30.00 423.50 VOUCHRE2 08/01/02 16:40 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TEMP.BLDG.INSPECT. 7/1-15/02 PLAN CHECKS/3/6-5/30/02 PLAN CHECKS/6/4-26/02 PLAN CHECKS 6/4 - 6/26 2002 29958 08/01/02 004108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SER W/COMP CLAIMS/JULY 18 & 19 '02 29959 08/01/02 003432 HOME DEPOT/GECF 29960 08/01/02 011698 MARI HUDSON PALM TREE LATE FEE MAINT SUPPLIES/JUNE 2002 CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING 29961 08/01/02 005356 HUNTER -KENNEDY & ASSOC EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS ADMIN STORM WATER/DEC 01 ADMIN STORM WATER PRG/JAN 02 ADMIN RECYCLE PRG/JAN 02 ADMIN STORM WATER PRG/FEB 02 ADMIN STORM WATER PRG/MARCH 02 EDUCATION PROGRAM/MARCH 02 EDUCATION PROGRAM/APRIL 02 ADMIN STORM WATER PRG/APRIL 02 EDUCATION PRG/MAY 02 ADMIN STORM WATER PRG/MAY 02 EDUCATION PRG/JUNE 02 ADMIN STORM WATER PRG/JUNE 02 EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM/FEB 02 29962 08/01/02 000781 INTERNATIONAL CONF OF B PUBLICATIONS 29963 08/01/02 002551 INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL REGISTRATION/M. EARL 29964 08/01/02 010334 GLENN JENSEN 29965 08/01/02 011645 DONNA J. KIM 29966 08/01/02 010713 MICHAEL KOVERMAN INSTRUCTOR PMT/SURF CAMP INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/MC-07 CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING 29967 08/01/02 000842 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CI REGISTRATION/ROONEY 29968 08/01/02 000167 LEARNED LUMBER 29969 08/01/02 010236 ANN LEWIS DOOR PURCHASE/JULY 02 LUMBER FOR TRAILER PARK JOB 2001 ASSESSMENT REBATE 29970 08/01/02 002175 LIEBERT, CASSIDY WHITMO LEGAL FEES/JUNE 2002 LEGAL FEES/JUNE 2002 29971 08/01/02. 008445 LITTLE CO OF MARY HOSPI PATIENT SERVICES 29972 08/01/02 011630 LOS ANGELES AREA FIRE C MEMBERSHIP DUES/TINGLEY ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4201-4201 001-4201-4201 001-4201-4201' 00174201-4201 705-1217-4324 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 001-6101-4309 110-3302 150-3102-4201 160-3102-4201 160-3102-4201 •150-3102-4201 160-3102-4201 160-3102-4201 150-3102-4201 150-3102-4201 160-3102-4201- 150-3102-4201 160-3102-4201 150-3102-4201 160-3102-4201 150-3102-4201 001-4201-4317 001-1203-4317 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 110-3302 001-4601-4317 001-4204-4309 160-3102-4309 105-3105 001-1203-4201 001-1203-4201 001-2101-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 2,720.00 7,101.78 4,712.41 980.50 2,481.35 139.64 20.00 59.22 30.00 800.00 5,791.70 4,530.00 255.00 4,870.00 5,295.00 1,020.00 425.00 4,615.00 170.00 3,880.00 85.00 5,644.00 372.30 845.92 515.00 875.00 808.50 30.00 425.00 70.36 58.81 24.61 3,109.70 3,811.00 478.00 001-2201-4315 200.00 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 18,154.69 2,481.35 218.86 30.00 37,753.00 845.92 515.00 875.00 808.50 30.00 425.00 129.17 24.61 6,920.70 478.00 200.00 VOUCHRE2 08/01/02 16:40 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 29973 08/01/02 009267 LOS ANGELES BUSINESS JO SUBSCRIPTION 29974 08/01/02 011189 LYNN CARD CO. 29975 08/01/02 010805 LISA LYNN 29976 08/01/02 007144 LEON C. MILLER 29977 08/01/02 010566 MORGAN WHOLESALE ELECTR LIGHT FIXTURE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKES ELECTRIC SUPPLIES NOTE CARDS REIMBURSE DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 2001 ASSESSMENT REBATE 29978 08/01/02 007801 MOTOROLA OFFICE SUPPLIES/# 7794 JUNE 02 29979 08/01/02 002490 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO MEMBERSHI.P DUES/TINGLEY 29980 08/01/02 010961 NEXT DAY SIGNS FIREWORKS PROHIBITED SIGNS 29981 08/01/02 011706 ONE GRAND PRODUCTS,INC. CLEANING SUPPLIES 29982 08/01/02 000321 PACIFIC BELL COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/JULY '02 29983 08/01/02 011640 DENISE PALMIERI INSTRUCTOR PMT/SURF CAMP 29984 08/01/02 004573 FRANCES PARKER 2001 ASSESSMENT REBATE 29985 08/01/02 010139 PARKING CONCEPTS INC. JUNE 2002 OPERATIONS LOT A OPERATIONS/JUNE 02 29986 08/01/02 011699 BETH PETROU REFUND OVERPAYMENT/RESTITUTION 29987 08/01/02 008482 PMX MEDICAL SPECIALTY MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 29988 08/01/02 011539 PROSUM TECHNOLOGY 29989 08/01/02 007658 MARGARITA ROJAS 29990 08/01/02 010837 S.C.A.C.E.O. 29991 08/01/02 011407 SALES GUIDES 29992 08/01/02 008793 SCAN-NATOA 29993 08/01/02 009737 LESLIE SOLYMOSI DESIGN/UPGRADE COMPUTER SYSTEM INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/FD-01 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/FD-02 REGISTRATION/BOB ROLLINS PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS MEMBERSHIP DUES/ROONEY 02/03 BEE SERVICE 29994 08/01/02 008812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBL OTT SPEAKER MICS V2-10074 29995 08/01/02 007704 SOUTH BAY YOUTH PROJECT YR 2002-2003• CONTRIBUTION cI ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1141-4315 001-2201-4305 001-4601-4308 105-3105 109-3304-4309 105-2601-4309 001-2021 001-2022 105-2601-4309 001-1208-4305 001-2201-4315 001-2201-4305 001-2201-4309 001-2101-4304 001-4601-4221 105-3105 109-3304-4231 109-3305-4231 001-3301 001-2201-4309 715-1206-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4201-4317 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4315 110-3302-4201 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 69.95 199.50 168.95 24.61 625.82 298.99 5.63 5.63- 306.00 483.77 115.00 455.27 285.91 57.49 90.00 24.61 12,316.92 11,691.51 25.00 496.01 10,900.00 196.00 210.00 60.00 852.17 75.00 595.00 388.21 3,000.00 PAGE, 4 CHECK AMOUNT 69.95 199.50 168.95 24.61 1,230.81 483.77 115.00 455.27 285.91 57.49 90.00 24.61 24,008.43 25.00 496.01 10,900.00 406.00 60.00 852.17 75.00 595.00 388.21 3,000.00 VOUCHRE2 08/01/02 16:40 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 5 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 29996 08/01/02 000146 SPARKLETTS WATER 001-4601-4305 19.65 WATER 001-4601-4305 17.90 37.55 29997 08/01/02 005195 STANDARD CONCRETE PRODU YARD CONCRETE 001-3104-4309 182.35 182.35 29998 08/01/02 010158 STEVENS-GARLAND ASSOCIA CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERV. 001-3104-42011,530.00 1,530.00 29999 08/01/02 009199 STONEBRIDGE PRODUCTIONS SUMMER 02 ENTERTAINMENT 001-4601-4201 5,000.00 BALANCE DUE ENTERTAINMENT 001-4601-4201 5,000.00 10,000.00 30000 08/01/02 000124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MATERIALS 160-3102-4309 215.37 MATERIALS 001-2021 4.40 MATERIALS 001-2022 4.40- 215.37 30001 08/01/02 011102, TORRANCE WHOLESALE' NURS LANDSCAPE PLANTS 001-6101-4309 290.11 290.11 30002 08/01/02 009364 TOYS R US MONTVALE REG DAY CAMP SUPPLIES/JUNE 02 001-4601-4308 137.98 137.98 30003 08/01/02 009374 U.S. ARMOR BALLISTIC VEST 001-2101-4187 1,014.41 1,014.41 30004 08/01/02 008097 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNI JUNE 2002 SAFEKEEPING FEES 001-1141-4201 291.67 291.67 30005 08/01/02 011035 US LANDSCAPES, INC. LANDSCAPE MAINT/JUNE 02 001-6101-4201 14,595.00 LANDSCAPE MAINT/JUNE 02 109-3301-4201 250.00 LANDSCAPE MAINT/JUNE 02 105-2601-4201 675.00 15,520.00 30006 08/01/02 001938 V & V MANUFACTURING POLICE OFFICER FLAT BADGES 001-2101-4187 183.81 183.81 30007 08/01/02 000015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA JULY 02 PHONE EXP.. 001-2201-4304 32.69 32.69 30008 08/01/02 009056 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTI E-MAIL/WEB PAGE STORAGE/SEPT 715-1206-4201 74.95 74.95 30009 08/01/02 000371 WEST BASIN WATER ASSOCI MEMBERSHIP DUES 2002/2003 001-1101-4315 200.00 200.00 30010 08/01/02 007590 WILSON & HAMPTON FILE CABINETS PAINTED 001-1121-4305 414.00 414.00 30011 08/01/02 001206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES MATERIALS 001-3104-4309 430.60 SIGN PURCHASE/CHILDREN AT PLAY 001-3104-4309 378.85 809.45 30012 08/01/02 011671 eKNOWLEDGE GROUP, INC. WORK GUARANTEE REFUND # 2852 001-2110 1,600.00 1,600.00 TOTAL CHECKS 284,765.81 ZZ, VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 08/01/02 16:40 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 185,026.45 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 1,513.46 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 24,884.25 110 PARKING FUND 12,186.47 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 3,143.65 150 GRANTS FUND 3,176.82 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 6,172.39 160 SEWER FUND 34,899.88 705 INSURANCE FUND - 2,481.35 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 11,281.09 TOTAL 284,765.81 e 93 PAGE 6 VOUCHRE2 08/05/02 11:34 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR .VENDOR ITEMACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 30013 08/05/02 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 001-1103 389,740.39 PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 105-1103 9,093.85 PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 109-1103 1,224.64 PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 110-1103 41,598.78 PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 117-1103 812.49 PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 140-1103 1,229.65 PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 145-1103 1,343.61 - PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 150-1103 71.91 PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 152-1103 33.05 PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 160-1103 10,554.53 PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 301-1103 2,219.20 PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 705-1103 3,138.18 PAYROLL/7-16 TO 7-31-02 7.15-1103 8,990.28 470,050.56 TOTAL CHECKS 470,050.56 a14 VOUCHRE2 08/05/02 11:34 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 389,740.39 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 9,093.85 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 1,224.64 110 PARKING FUND 41,598.78 117 AB939 FUND 812.49 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 1,229.65 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,343.61 150 GRANTS FUND 71.91 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT,DIST FUND 33.05 160 SEWER FUND 10,554.53 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 2,219.20 705 INSURANCE FUND 3,138.18 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 8,990.28 TOTAL 470,050.56 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 08/05/02 11:34 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THEANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES 1 TOP-nINCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR -71/r-- Wi D2 ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINANC DIRECTOR 6 �, DATE V 1 51?`• PAGE 3 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council August 05, 2002 For the Meeting of August 13, 2002 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the checks listed below: #29376 — 11/10/99 — Lyn Riley - $1,250.00. The check was lost. A stop payment was placed and the check was reissued. Acct. # 001-2201-4201 #29286 — 5/30/02 — Ca Conference of Arson Investigators - $65.00. The class was cancelled. The check was not mailed. Acct. # 001-2201-4317 #29752 — 07/18/02 — Laura Blank - $210.00. Wrong vendor used. The check was not mailed. Acct.# 001-4601-4221 #29921 — 07/25/01 — eKnowledge Group - $1,600.00 Wrong vendor used. The check was not mailed. Acct.# 001-2110 #29948 — 08/01/02 — Flag House Furniture Express - $218.55 The check was issued for the wrong amount. The check was not mailed. Acct.# 001-1208-4305 #29978 — 08/01/02 - Motorola - $483.77 Wrong vendor used. The check was not mailed. Acct.# 001-1208-4305 #30012 — 08/01/02 — eKnowledge Group - $1,600.00 Wrong vendor used. The check was not mailed. Acct.# 001-2110 Concur: V�4 Step] n R.Burrell, City Manager Workman, City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director • August 8, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council xe-c/P-1-q-) YA5/0,D._ Regular Meeting of August 13, 2002 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS NO MEETING APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Public Works Commission meeting of August 28, 2002 Public Works Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of August 20, 2002 Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of August 6, 2002 July Activity Reports Community Resources Director All Departments Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of September 17, 2002 Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of September 3, 2002 August Activity Reports Community Resources Director All Departments Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of October 15, 2002 Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of October 1, 2002 Community Resources Director September Activity Reports All Departments Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Public Works Commission meeting of September 18, 2002 Public Works Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of October 15, 2002 Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of October 1, 2002 Community Resources Director September Activity Reports All Departments PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSIc MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, JULY 17, 2002 ROOM 4, COMMUNITY CENTER 710 PEIR AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 7:00 P.M. kl-c#-(1-c) MINUTES The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. 1. Roll Call Present: Also Present: Commissioners Cheatham, Howell, Koch, Lombardo Winnek arrived at 8:35 p.m. Harold Williams, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Michael Flaherty, Public Works Superintendent Rhea Punneo, Administrative Assistant, Public Works Department 2. Flaq Salute Commissioner Chris Howell led the flag salute. 3. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the May 15, 2002 meeting approved as written. 4. Public Comments None. 5. Correspondence None. 6. Items for commission consideration a. Proposed taxi zone change - Hermosa Avenue at Pier Avenue South approach to Pier Ave. Mr. Williams presented the item with the recommendation that a new taxi zone on Hermosa Avenue be established. Mr. Flaherty presented the details of the report. He noted that the biggest problem with the current location of the taxi zone is the pedestrians jaywalking to get a cab. In addition, over 200 cabs have paid fees to work in the City — a situation the Police Department will look into at a later date. At any one time, there could be 10 to 12 cabs lined up waiting to get into the legal taxi zone which creates a dangerous situation on Hermosa Avenue. He said that the change with the least amount of negative damage would include moving the zone as noted in the report, . adjusting/relocating the meters, and moving the green zone 2d while accommodating the bank's ATM machine customers. He noted that an email had been received from the MTA supporting the proposal; they'd prefer to have far side stops vs. near side stops for safety reasons. Mr. Williams requested the following changes to the report: 1. Page 2, under Alternatives, line 1, and please delete this sentence entirely. 2. Attachment 3 - delete text (convert taxi parking to 4 metered parking spaces). Discussion of the item highlighted the following: • The area was a left turn pocket before the Pier Plaza was developed. • There is concern that cabs may be turning into the residential area as they leave the City with passengers. • Cab spaces are smaller than regular parking spaces because taxis park bumper to bumper and regular parking is not done bumper to bumper — the 5 spaces allotted for taxis would be 4 spaces for regular parking. It is possible the new bus stop area could be shared with taxis — buses stop running after 10:00 p.m. • Taxi franchise does not go before the Public Works Commission, only relocation of the zone. • A review by the Chief of Police, 3 sergeants and Mike Flaherty determined that this plan was the least offensive to businesses in the area. • Signage for the area would be difficult and potentially difficult to enforce • Could put the taxi zone in the alley. • It is important the buses are able to swing in and out of the bus zone easily therefore relocated to the far side of the intersection. Suggested use of 13th Court as area for stacking with a 15 -minute green zone in front of the ice cream store — problem is some of it is no parking and there is 2 -way traffic • . Suggestion. was made to use center median,vacated by taxis as regular parking area — noted that this could become an accident prone area for cars leaving and/or backing into the spaces • There isn'tenough room to install a railing along the sidewalk to prevent pedestrians from jaywalking to the taxis. MOTION by Commissioner Howell to support the change and request that staff obtain residents' comments resident/taxi comments. Comments to be forwarded with item when sent to Council. Seconded by Commissioner Cheatham. Ayes: Cheatham, Howell Nays: Koch, Lombardo Abstain: None Absent: Winnek Motion failed. PWC Minutes 2 7/17/02 • • MOTION by Commissioner Lombardo revised to supportthe change, only after someone looks into widening the center median towards Pier and narrowing the 11th Street end, preserving the center median for parking. At this time Mr. Williams noted that a left turn pocket onto 11th could mislead a driver into thinking that the pocket is an open-ended left turn lane which could lead to rear -end collisions with cars parked in the median parking area. MOTION revised by Commissioner Lombardo to the following: Support staff's recommendation and look into the possibility of preserving or expanding center lane parking where taxis were located. Seconded by Commissioner Howell. Ayes: Cheatham, Howell, Lombardo Nays: Koch Abstain: None Absent: Winnek Motion passed. b. Review proposed speed hump policies and procedures. Mr. Williams presented the item noting that concerns for speeding on residential streets in the City have prompted the request for speed hump policies and procedures. Staff is requesting that the Commission review and comment on the policies and procedures. There are many treatments that are available but most are not desirable in Hermosa Beach. It was noted that speed humps are very different from speed bumps. Speed humps are a road treatment, not a speed control device and have been effective in many areas. Discussion of the item highlighted the following: • The residents would request the speed bumps via petition. • Removal would be at the instigation of the residents who would pay for that removal. • Commissioners would like to review the applications for speed humps as they are received — possibly as a precaution for the first year. • Policy being put into place in an effort to speed up the process. Speed humps would be installed on local streets as defined by the General Plan; streets would have to meet all criteria in the policy; speed humps would not be installed on streets with over a 5% grade. • Speed humps would not be installed on collector streets or were emergency vehicles frequently travel. • The first test case is on Hillcrest council approved the installation of speed humps without a policy being in place. Any new requests will need 65% of the neighbors to sign the petition. • The Public Works Commission would hear appeals. • The requirement that the. hump be at least 200' from an intersection would. be flexible. MOTION by Commissioner Cheatham that the Commission support the adoption of the Speed Hump Policies & Procedures and add a paragraph to the procedures noting that the PWC Minutes 3 7/17/02 application be brought to the Commission priorto going to City Council. Seconded by Commissioner Lombard. Ayes: Cheatham, Howell, Koch, Lombardo Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Winnek Motion passed. c. Summary of the Update 5 -Year Plan, 2002-03 through 2006-07 Mr. Williams presented the item noting that it was not yet complete due to 02-03 budget preparation and the move back to City Hall. Discussion highlighted the following: • The CIP's still follow the original list as prioritized by the subcommittee. • Priorities change when the time comes for funding; the City Manager makes the final decision as to which projects get to Council for funding. • Projects may have moved back because there was no available funding in the current year. • Some new projects may be added (example: 02-147 Handicap Ramp Upgrades) because specific funding is available. • TyCom project is funded and will be added to the list. 7. Commissioner's Reports Infrastructure Subcommittee The subcommittee met with a member of the City Council to ensure they were on the right track. They will meet with staff to review their materials at a date yet to be determined. 8. Council Agendas — April & May Minutes, June agendas a. Monthly Activity Report — April, May b. Project Status Reports — April, No May Report All received and filed. 9. Items requested by Commissioners List of updated action items presented. Discussion at this time highlighted the following: • The pedestrian sign at Pier and Bard was stolen — sign had been attached with epoxy. New signs will be bolted to the street. PWC Minutes 7/17/02 • Commission would like to be involved in the development of the requirements for the PCH median enhancements being prepared by the Economic Development Review Committee (EDRC). Staff hasn't yet received a schedule of projects as a work item but once received, it will be made available for the Commission. • There is no formal sharing of information with regard to projects being done at the City border streets. 10. Other matters Commissioner Howell said he'd like to see a Tree Sub -Committee that could develop protocol and update existing tree policies, procedures and the approved tree list. Is there a proposal to provide an up-to-date list of trees that are favorable with proper tree selections and added to the Tree Sub -Committee? It was noted that this may actually be in the purview of the Parks & Recreation Department and perhaps this could be a joint subcommittee with that commission. MOTION by Commissioner Cheatham that a Tree Subcommittee is formed. Seconded by Commissioner Lombardo. Commissioner Howell will provide the current policy and procedure information with the currently acceptable tree list. Ayes: Cheatham, Howell, Koch, Lombardo Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Winnek Motion passed. Commissioner Cheatham noted that a television special would be on the Discover Channel .. on July 27 at 9:00 p.m. It is entitled "Deadly Crossings" and may be of interest to • all Commissioners as it is about street crossings. Commissioner Cheatham asked about the status of .the newsracks and was advised that the department was having some difficulty obtaining the pricing information in writing from the manufacturer - Kjack. There had been some progress that day and it was hoped that some definite information would be available by the next Commission meeting. Commissioner Cheatham asked in a deceleration lane had been considered for the corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Pier Avenue where the new bank is being constructed. Mr. Williams advised that it had been considered but, if it was constructed, the bank wouldn't have had enough land to complete their project as planned. Commissioner_ Cheatham asked about any improvements to the traffic signal at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and 2" Street. Mr. Williams advised that the contract had been let and that Caltrans would be upgrading the signal heads, not changing the timing. Per John Hill of Caltrans, the overall coordination of the signals will not change. Second Street is the only location where the timing will be changed in order to assist with congestion at that intersection. PWC Minutes 5 7/17/02 Mr. Williams requested that the date of the August meeting be changed as he and Mr. Flaherty will notbe available. Ms. Punneo will coordinate rescheduling the meeting. 8:35 p.m. Chairman Winnek arrived. 11. Public Comments None. 12. Adjournment At 8:38 p.m. Vice Chairman Cheathamadjourned to the August meeting, date to be determined. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Public Works Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of July 17, 2002. Victor Winnek, Chairman Date Harold C. Williams, P.E., Secretary PWC Minutes 6 7/17/02 July 31, 2002 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL August 13, 2002 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #26057 (C.U.P. CON NO. 00-1.9, PDP NO. 00-22) LOCATION: 709 & 711 1ST PLACE APPLICANT(S): TOUMANJAN DEVELOPMENT CORP. REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A TWO- UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel. Map No. 26057 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a two unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No.26057 at their October 17, 2000 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. 2e Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: So : lumenfe . , t irector Community , ) evelopment Department Step. e . Burrell City Manager f Respectfully submitted/ en ' o . ertson Associate Planner y/£fm709-1st 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #26057 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 709 & 711 1ST PLACE; HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on August 13, 2002 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article . 5 (commencing with Section 65300). of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined inPlanning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 00-59 adopted after hearing on October 17, 2000; E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map No.26057 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 116, Walter Ransom Co's Venable Place, as recorded in Book 9, Page(s) 150 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 709 & 711 1st Place, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 13th day of August, 2002. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California AT 1'EST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY f:fm709-1st reso July 31, 2002 HONORABLE MAYOR and. MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL August 13, 2002 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #25665 (C.U.P. CON NO. 01-19, PDP NO. 99-31) LOCATION: 30 & 32 8TH STREET APPLICANT(S): ROBERT A. NEWSOME REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map No. 25665 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a two unit condominium project at their October 19, 1999 meeting and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No.25665 at their January 15, 2002 meeting. The project has been completed and a Certificate of Occupancy issued. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to -submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to. the City. Council and must be approved by the City Council,. "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of. approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. 2f Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: So lumenf d, I irector Community evelopment Department Stephen ' : "rell City M. er 2 Respectfully sub 't en Ro rtson Associate Planner y/f:fm32-8th 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29. RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #25665 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 30 & 32 8TH STREET , HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on August 13, 2002 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 02-1 adopted after hearing on January 15, 2002; E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Councildoes hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map No.25665 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 10, Block 8, Hermosa Beach Tract, as recorded in Book 1, Page(s) 25 and 26 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 30 & 32 8th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 13th day of August, 2002. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California A1"LEST: .. APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY ffm32-8th reso "D)//0.) --- July 31, 2002 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL August 13, 2002 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #26290 (C.U.P. CON NO. 01-5, PDP NO. 01-5) LOCATION: 2930 & 2934 HERMOSA AVENUE (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS 2935 PALM DRIVE) APPLICANT(S): ROBERT CAMPBELL REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A TWO- UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map No. 26290 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a two unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No.26290 at their April 17, 2001 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to. the City Council and must be approved.by the. City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. Analysis k The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Sol Blume ? eld, Director Communit Development Department Step urre City Manager Respectfully submitted, Associate Planner y/f:fm2935Palm 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #26290' FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 2930 & 2934 HERMOSA AVENUE (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS 2935 PALM DRIVE), HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on August 13, 2002 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. !The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 01-13 adopted after hearing on April 17, 2001; E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map No.26290 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 1, Block 106, Shakespeare Tract, as recorded in Book 9, Page(s) 190 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 2930 & 2934 Hermosa Avenue (previously known as 2935 Palm Drive), Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 13th day of August, 2002. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK • . CITY ATTORNEY . f:fm2935pahu reso July 31, 2002 a/ V0Q HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL August 13, 2002 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #26299 (C.U.P. CON NO. 01-6, PDP NO. 01-6) LOCATION: 617 & 619 1ST STREET APPLICANT(S): ROBERT CAMPBELL REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map No. 26299 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a two unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No.26299 at their March 20, 2001 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements. of [Subdivision Map Act] and any.local subdivision ordinance. applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. 2h Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: li i . 77Blume eld, '11irector Communit Development Department Step City urre anager Respe tfully sub .'tte en R. . rtson Associate Planner y/f fm617-1st 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 .29 RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #26299 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 617 & 619 1ST STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on August 13, 2002 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. Tie approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 01-7 adopted after hearing on March 20, 2001; E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to I5268(b)(3), "Approval' of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map No.26299 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 134, Walter Ransom Co's Venable Palce, as recorded in Book 9, Page(s) 150 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 617 & 619 1st Street, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 13th day of August, 2002. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California AT I't;ST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY f:fm617-1st reso Monday, August 05, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council August 13, 2002 A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT AND AMEND THE EXISTING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY INTERAGENCY METROPOLITAN POLICE APPREHENSION CRIME TASK FORCE (ALSO KNOWN AS L.A. IMPACT) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council: 1. Adopt the attached resolution , and 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the amended LA IMPACT memorandum of understanding. BACKGROUND: In August of 1991 the City Council formally adopted a resolution to participate in the newly created LA IMPACT crime task force. A MOU was adopted at that time. The major objective of LA IMPACT has been to reduce drug trafficking and investigate other major crimes in the Los Angeles region. The Hermosa Beach Police Department has assigned personnel to participate in this task force off and on over the years as staffing permitted ANALYSIS: Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 LA IMPACT will be expanding its role to include the investigation and prosecution of crimes associated with terrorist activity. The attached resolution for adoption by the City Council is to approve the amended and restated MOU relating to jointly and collectively targeting the investigation and prosecution of terrorists and criminal activity, in addition to LA IMPACT's current effort in prosecuting drug trafficking throughout Los Angeles County. Similar resolutions are being presented to the City Councils of other Los Angeles County cities as well. As there is state and federal funding that helps defray the operational costs of the team, it was originally determined that resolutions be adopted by the participating cites of Los Angeles County. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no cost associated with the adoption of this resolution. Respectfully sub 'tted: Concur: Michael Chief o ephen Burrell City Manager 2i • • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ADOPTING AN AMENDED AND RESTATED MOU AUTHORIZING L.A. IMPACT TO ALSO TARGET, INVESTIGATE AND PROSECUTE INDIVIDUALS WHO ENGAGE IN TERRORISM WHEREAS, in 1991 cities in Los Angeles County authorized participation in L.A. Impact by adopting a joint powers agreement and MOU (herein MOU); WHEREAS, L.A. Impact has been very successful in accomplishing its original mission; and WHEREAS, the original mission of L.A. Impact is stated in the MOU as: The Mission of the Los Angeles Interagency Metropolitan Police Apprehension Crime Task Force is to promote coordinated law enforcement efforts, and to address emerging criminal justice issues throughout the Los Angeles County area, encouraging maximum cooperation between all law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies, and insuring the safety of both police personnel and the public, accomplished in an efficient manner within constitutional guidelines. Initially L.A. Impact will target, investigate and prosecute individuals who organize, direct, finance, or otherwise engage in medium -to -high level drug trafficking enterprises or money laundering, placing a high priority on those subjects engaged in the importation of drugs into Los Angeles County, and to interdict such illicit supply lines and seize their drugs. L.A. Impact is also established to identify and ultimately convict medium -to -high level drug traffickers and to seize assets derived through drug trafficking through the effective methods of a task force approach; and WHEREAS, recent events of horrific historical proportions demand that law enforcement agencies respond collectively to terrorist threats; and WHEREAS, L.A. Impact has become a model of interagency cooperation and effectiveness in Los Angeles County by accomplishing its mission to target, investigate and prosecute drug traffickers who threaten our society and our youth; and WHEREAS, L.A. Impact is uniquely situated to undertake a joint and cooperative effort to confront terrorist threats to our society on a local basis; and WHEREAS, an amendment to the mission statement of L.A. Impact previously adopted by city councils is an appropriate method to create a mechanism to jointly confront terrorism in Los Angeles County on an organized basis, and WHEREAS, THE Chiefs of Police of each city in Los Angeles County are uniquely suited to develop and execute these programs and plans which are necessary to confront the significant threats to our society; and WHEREAS, state law authorizes cities to approve agreements by which they can jointly exercise powers common to cities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby adopts the amended and restated L.A. Impact MOU which shall include the following provisions: 1. "The Mission of the Los Angeles Interagency Metropolitan Police Apprehension Crime Task Force is to promote coordinated law enforcement efforts, and to address emerging criminal justice issues through the Los Angeles County area, encouraging maximum cooperation between all law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies, and insuring the safety of both police personnel and the public, accomplished in an efficient manner within constitutional guidelines. Initially, L.A. Impact will target, investigate and prosecute individuals who - organize, direct, finance, or otherwise engage in medium -to -high level drug trafficking enterprises or money laundering, placing a high priority on those subject engaged in the importation of drugs into Los Angeles County, and to interdict such illicit supply lines and seize their drugs. L.A. Impact is also established to identify and ultimately convict medium -to -high IeVel drug traffickers and to seize assets derived through drug trafficking through the effective methods of a task force approach. Additionally, L.A. Impact, as a separate and distinct mission, separately funded or as may be authorized by participating member agencies, shall cooperatively and jointly target, investigate and prosecute individuals who engaged in any activity relating to terrorism and criminal activity which threatens the public health, safety and welfare of citizens. This Amendment shall be effective when fifty percent (50%) plus one (1) of the cities with eligible police departments adopt by council action, the MOU as amended and restated herein, but only as to those cities who do so. 2. The Council authorizes the Chief of Police of the City to act as the exclusive agent and representative of the City t� the Task Force and, further authorizes the Chief; with respect to drug trafficking, to allocate personnel and financial resources in accordance with the MOU and applicable provisions of law concerning asset seizures and forfeitures; and further, with respect to terrorist and criminal activity, to allocate personnel and financial resources in accordance with the MOU and as may be funded separately or authorized by the City Council. 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2002. ATTEST: City Clerk Vote: Mayor July 30, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council /*Oc3— Regular Meeting of August 13, 2002 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE INTEREST OF PARTICIPATING IN THE SOUTH BAY COMMUNITIES AND AFFILIATES ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM (SBCA) AND DESIGNATING A POINT OF CONTACT FOR THE CITY Recommendation: Adopt resolution. Background: The SBCA has received $1.9 million in funding. The SBCA is an outgrowth of the South Bay Cities Standing Committee on Energy. A summary of the program is attached. The program, onceimplemented, would provide coupons, informational materials, partnerships with suppliers, all with the goals of reducing energy consumption. The program will be coordinated by Rita Norton & Associates, LLC and ASW Engineering Management Consultants Inc.. The South Bay Cities Council of Governments will serve as the program's community organizer. Respectfully submitted, , / tephen R. Burrell City Manager 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF '1'HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE INTEREST OF THE CITY IN PARTICPIATING IN THE SOUTH BAY COMMUNITIES AND AFFILIATES ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM (SBCA) AND DESIGNATING A POINT OF CONTACT FOR THE CITY. WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has developed a new program of funding innovative energy efficiency programs for the State's residents, businesses and public buildings; WHEREAS, the South Bay Cities Standing Committee on Energy, Rita Norton & Associates, and staff from the City of Redondo Beach worked together to develop .a proposal that would benefit the residents of South Bay Cities; WHEREAS, the CPUC awarded a grant of approximately $1.9 million for development and implementation of the South Bay Communities and Affiliates Energy Efficiency Program (SBCA), to provide energy efficiency education, outreach and financial incentives in order to achieve energy efficiency in approximately 15,000 households in the South Bay area; WHEREAS, SBCA will be implemented in South Bay cities located within the Southern California Edison (SCE) Company and Southern California Gas Company (SCG) utility service territory, with SCE as the Investor Owner Utility (IOU) contract administrator; WHEREAS, all member cities of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) are eligible to participate in the program; WHEREAS, participating cities are asked to commit to supporting the program through activities such as: providing links to the program on City web pages, distributing promotional material, assisting with outreach to local retailers, serving on program advisory committees, and facilitating _workshops at community center; WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach agrees to provide such support for the program, in return for which residents will have the opportunity to participate in rebate incentives and educational outreach programs that promote energy efficiency; WHEREAS, in order to participate throughout the planning and implementation phases of the program, the City must provide a letter or resolution of interest by August 15, 2002; -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • • NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Stephen Burrell, City Manager, is hereby designated as the point of contact for Hermosa Beach's participation in the South Bay Communities and Affiliates Energy Efficiency Program at the following address: Stephen Burrell, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Telephone: (310) 318-0216 Fax: (310) 372-6186 e-mail: sburrell@hermosabch.org Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and shall enter the same in the Book of Original Resolutions, and shall send a copy of this resolution to the City of Redondo Beach Mayor's Office, addressed as follows: Mayor Greg Hill City of Redondo Beach 415 Diamond St. Redondo Beach, CA 90277 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 13th day of August 2002. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California -2- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 • 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney -3- E. - South Bay Conznzunities and Af�tes Energy Savings Program PY 2002-2003 LOCAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS CPUC DECISION 02-05-046, RULEMAKING 01-08-028 SOUTH BAY COMMUNITIES AND AFFILIATES (SBCA) ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM Executive Summary The SBCA Program leverages the outreach and marketing strengths of local governments by offering access and incentives to Energy Usage Education and ENERGY STAR® products resulting in 15,000 households becoming more energy efficient. SBCA estimates that the coupon and financial incentive program •will .result in an annual energy savings of an estimated 33,340 Therms and 5,968,023 kWh. This program provides energy efficiency information and incentives to residential customers and residential property owners/managers necessary for the implementation of energy efficiency measures and long term behavior changes. The fmancial incentive program will serve 7,000 households, and with 3,000 households participating in the coupon redemption program and 4,000 households, residing in multi- family buildings, receiving benefits from the energy measures retrofitting the buildings in which they reside. The education component will reach an additional 8,000 individual customers with customized information helping them to achieve greater energy efficiency. The program has a Planning and Implementation phase for the SFD component. During the Planning Phase, the use of coupons for Point of Purchase retailers will be designed for implementation / redemption. On the basis of having secured participation of retailers during the planning phase, the incentives will be offered by a coupon redemption process that will be managed and implemented by SBCA and its participating local governmetit agencies in the Implementation Phase. The Implementation Phase for the Multi -Family Dwelling sector will be conducted through securing the participation of MFD property owners, and monitoring of the contractors who provide services to these properties. SBCA will offer the fmancial incentive packets to these property owners, in connection with the installation of the measures offered by SBCA. SBCA will be implemented in the South Bay Communities area located within the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and the Southern California Gas Company (SCG) utility service territory. The Investor Owned Utility (IOU) contract administrator is SCE. The SBCA program implementer is Rita Norton & Associates, LLC with ASW Engineering Management Consultants, Inc. as the program's subcontractor and with the cities of the LA South Bay, known as the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) agreeing to serve as the program's community organizer. For the purpose of this project, Rita Norton & Associates, LLC retains associates who are responsible for specific tasks and accomplishments. June 28, 2002 Page 1 of 6 L South Bay Communities and Aftates Energy Savings Program This innovative program is based on the "one-two" principle — that is education without a pull is not enough. Funding under this project supports education, "instant" rebates, and a "seamless" program of making direct contact with owners and managers, and arranging for implementation together with financial incentives. Use of these two linked elements is what catapults this outreach and education program into market adoption of new products and services. Governance, SBCA unites several organizations to achieve long term energy savings. Rita Norton & Associates, LLC will subcontract for the completion of major deliverables with ASW, the association of local governments, and CCA Management, LLC: The local governments eligible to participate include the cities and towns belonging to the South Bay Cities Council of Governments ((SBCCOG): Carson, El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood,Lawndale, Lomita, Manhattan Beach, Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, Torrance. Local government participants will have funds to set up a shared office and retain and train staff for this initiative. SBCA will form the necessary Advisory Committees to help guide and advice on outreach letters, solicitation of retailers, outreach thru city channels and use and allocation of local resources. The project will employ contract and service agreements with the use of appropriate controls, invoice payment plans, measures tracking plans and other controls to guide and control the program and use of funds. Implementation Overview The program has two target audiences: single family residential and multi -family residential. The single family residential market component involves packaging the appropriate type of incentives in order to produce effectiveenergy, savings. The multi -family component involves sustaining on-going communications with managers and owners as well as residents in order to initiate and complete the retrofit projects that are being offered. %, ' The financial incentives offered under the SBCA have been identified to be limited to the following: Programmable Thermostats (Air-conditioning) Ceiling Fans Multi -Family HVAC split-pkg units($/ton) Drinking Water Coolers Single Family Space Gas Furnaces Single Family Efficient Gas Water Heaters Single Family Lighting CFL's MFD Lighting Common Areas Dishwashers Clothes Washers Window AC Units Window Tinting SBCA will conduct both outreach and marketing elements under this program. Outreach will involve securing ENERGY STAR® Partner status, participation of retailers, multi -family property owners, allied trade groups and product manufactures and distributors. Marketing June 28, 2002 • Page 2 of 6 4 South Bay Communities and Af rates Energy Savings Program will involve providing information and education to residents so that they can take advantage of both SBCA program offering as well as those from other agencies. In a partnership with local government agencies and community based organizations, SBCA will produce and distribute marketing materials that will reinforce the message of energy efficiency and will capitalize on the natural synergy that exists between traditional energy efficiency implementers and local government agencies. The SBCA will identify high quality and useful educational materials to promote the availability of recommended energy efficiency measures, with a major emphasis on ENERGY STAR® products. New materials will be developed and printed offering incentives for the SBCA list of measures. Information regarding the "limited time only" availability of SBCA incentives related to ENERGY STAR® and other recommended products and services will be included in bill inserts, or where local government services are sought by this market segment. SBCA .will- coordinate with local government agency representatives in the design of the "coupon". Collaboration on design will assure comprehensiveness. Energy efficiency tips and in-home energy education will be offered with the coupon application/redemption forms. Preference will be given to the communities who provide "in-kind' assistance in terms of promotion in their newsletters, staffing at fairs and community events and incorporating into the day to day operations. All of the SBCCOG cities are eligible to participation. From this, the design criteria for participation include: • Letter of support • Council adoption of resolution • Willingness to have link on city web page to project • Willingness to promote project • Assistance in outreach to local retailers within their jurisdiction such as providing% master list of all applicable retailers and contact names • Introductory letter from mayor to retailers outlining program 4. Willingness to include insert in city (or under contract to city) project mailers at no cost announcing the coupon in the garbage or water bills • List of suggested MFD properties • Willingness to serve on advisory committees • Willingness to facilitate in achievement of educational objectives • Willingness to facilitate workshops at community centers • Willingness to work with project to allocate resources Marketing material will be designed for optimal coordination with the local government agency, community based organization, and local and statewide energy efficiency programs. Program materials will include, but may not be limited to the following: Program coupon . - - Program informational brochure Program flier Direct mail material - Program bill insert Point of Purchase materials (POP) Web site Workshops June 28, 2002 Page 3 of 6 South Bay Communities and Ates Energy Savings Program Informational video for group presentations Energy education: "tips" for energy conservation Imprinted "give -a ways" Event signage / banners SBCA will leverage its outreach and marketing efforts and will integrate it with local programs such as those that offer information and education through various crosscutting activities (e.g., recycling information centers, city web sites). Energy fairs will be planned to display available products and provide information of how to benefit from the information and coupon programs. SBCA will establish a toll free telephone number for interested parties to use for the duration of the program. The purpose of the telephone line if to offer interested customers the opportunity to ask specific questions about the program, and general questions about energy efficiency. The SBCA Customer Information 800 telephone number will be printed on all marketing material, program information, applications, and coupons. Customers, will be able to contact the 800 during regular business hours with general and specific questions regarding SBCA. During "off hours," the 800 telephone line will be equipped with a voice messaging system to record customer calls and messages. SBCA is committed to returning customer calls within 24 hours of the nearest business day. Program Implementation Timeline Q3 2002 (Jul -Sep) 1. Execute agreements with all Program Partners 2. Create Local Government's Energy Office 3. Complete MFD Implementation Plan and pilot test 4. Conduct Research on Coupon Feasibility 5. Complete Research on Coupon Feasibility 6. Finalize Marketing Plan L 7. Finalize Education Plan Q4 2002 (Oct -Dec) 1. Launch Financial Incentives Program Marketing for SFD and MFD Quantitative milestones: Deemed Kwhs: 615,585 Deemed Therms: 1,334 Educational Interventions: 750 01 2003 (Jan -Mar) 1. Implement Financial Incentives programs 2. Conduct special events over program months 3. Launch annual "calendar of the year" special marketing events 4. Issue regular reports to publicize results 5. Market program through associations, governments and management companies Quantitative milestones: Deemed Kwhs: 1,338,110 Deemed Therms: 8,002 Educational Interventions: 1250 Q2 2003 (Apr -Jun) June 28, 2002 Page 4 of 6 • South Bay Communities and A . tes Energy Savings Program 1. Implement Financial Incentives programs 2. Conduct special events over program months 3. Launch annual "calendar of the year" special marketing events 4. Issue regular reports to publicize results 5. Market program through associations, governments and management companies Quantitative milestones: Deemed Kwhs: 1,338,110 Deemed Therms: 8,002 Educational Interventions: 2000 03 2003 (Jul -Sep) 1. Implement Financial Incentives programs 2. Conduct special events over program months 3. Launch annual "calendar of the year" special marketing events 4. , Issue regular reports to publicize. results 5. Market program through associations, governments and management companies Quantitative milestones: Deemed Kwhs: 1,338,110 Deemed Therms: 8,002 Educational Interventions: 2000 04 2003 (Oct -Dec) 1. Implement Financial Incentives programs 2. Conduct special events over program months 3. Launch annual "calendar of the year" special marketing events 4. Issue regular reports to publicize results 5. Market program through associations, governments and management companies Quantitative milestones: Deemed Kwhs: 1,338,110 Deemed Therms: 8,002 Educational Interventions: 2000 01.2004 (Jan -Mar) 1. Program close out activities 2. Submittal of final report Budget Breakdown: SBCA for the SCE and SCG Service Territory. ITEM $ % of Total $ & (%) Electric $ & (%) Gas Labor 144,000.00 Program PGC Charge PGC Charge Benefits Budget Administrative Costs - Labor 144,000.00 7.56% $81,162.40 $62,837.60 Benefits 0.00% Travel/Conference/Training 15,000.00 0.79% 7,500 7,500.00 Overhead and General Administrative costs 74,475.00 3.91% 37,237.50 37,237.50 Subcontractor Administrative costs 476,570.00 25.02% 238,285.00 238,285.00 June 28, 2002 Page 5 of 6 South Bay Communities and Af z tes Energy Savings Program Total Administrative Costs 710,045.00 37.28% $364,184.90 (51%) $345,860.10 (49%) Marketing/Advertising/Outreach Costs 143,500.00 7.53% $52,250.00 (36%) $91,250.00 (64%) Financial Incentives: Direct Implementation 1,020,000.00 53.56% 901,250.00 (88%) 118,750.00 (12%) E M &V. Rev. Costs 20,000.00 1.05% 10,000.00 (50%) 10,000.00 (50%) Total Other Costs 11,017.00 0.58% 5,508.50 (50%) 5,508.50 (50%) Budget Grand Total 1,904,562.00 100.00% 1,333,193.40 (70%) 571,368.60 (30%) See attached worksheet for detailed budget. June 28, 2002 Page 6 of 6 Thursday, August 1, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council August 13, 2002 Regular meeting of PURCHASE OF MOTOROLA UHF RADIO EQUIPMENT FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council: 1. Authorize the purchase and installation of Motorola brand UHF mobile and portable radio hardware and software for the fire department from South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority at a cost of $30,727.64. Authorize the re -appropriation of $30,728 from the 2001/2002 budget to the 2002/2003 budget -to accomplish this purchase. BACKGROUND The current fire department radio hardware, mobile (permanently mounted in fire apparatus) and portable (handheld by personnel), is limited to operating only on the VHF band. This situation is not adequate and presents a potential firefighter safety issue. Any emergency that requires mutual aid, either provided by the Hermosa Beach Fire Department, or received from another South Bay agency to Hermosa Beach, poses a serious communication issue. Manhattan Beach, El Segundo, Torrance, and Los Angeles County Fire Departments all utilize UHF band for radio communications. Redondo Beach Fire Department utilizes the 800 band for communications. Current mutual aid emergency radio operations by the fire department rely on the sole use of (3) UHF band portables to provide communication capability with those agencies that utilize UHF band. The (3) UHF portables currently in use by the fire department are owned, and on loan, from the Manhattan Beach Fire Department. Recently the fire department has received a request to return the (3) loaned UHF portables back to Manhattan Beach Fire Department. This would leave the fire department without UHF band communication capabilities. 2k Current mutual aid emergency radio operations within Redondo Beach are dependent upon the on scene arrival issuance of a Redondo Beach Fire Department 800 band portable radio to Hermosa Beach Fire personnel for radio communications. This situation has proven to be awkward and unreliable. The current status of fire department radio communication hardware presents a potentially serious safety issue for firefighters. The fire department is actively working with South Bay and Southern California fire agencies in addressing the communication issue of fire service radio inter -operability. Regardless of the specific logistics, the fire department assessment of general fire service direction indicates that the UHF band will be the chosen common frequency band for fire agencies. The fire department anticipates coordinating the conversion from VHF band to UHF band for radio communication sometime during 2003. The City budgeted monies for the fiscal year 2001/2002 in the amount of $15,660.00 for the purchase of fire department radio equipment, $15,466 for the purchase of replacement safety equipment, and $8,700 for the purchase of safety gear turn -outs. During the fiscal year 2001/2002 the fire department did not purchase the budgeted radio equipment nor encumber all monies identified for 'replacement safety equipment and safety gear turn -outs. $30,728 is available from the remaining funds. The fire department has recently adopted specific emergency standard operating procedures that require individual firefighters to possess a means of radio communication. In addition, the immediate need to provide 800 band communications has become a priority. These factors and the likelihood of permanent conversion to the UHF band makes it necessary to increase original budgeted amount to reflect additional radio hardware. The fire department identified a minimum specific radio communication hardware need and obtained bid proposals from two of the vendors. Advanced Electronics declined to bid. Motorola and South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority responded with bid proposals. The lowest bid quotation for identified radio hardware equipment and installation was ' received from South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority. for $30,727.64. FISCAL IMPACT The funds required for the purchase of this radio hardware, software, and installation must be re -appropriated to the current year 200212003. The total cost is $30,727.64. Respectfully submitted, ELL TINGLEY, CHIEF Concur: ST -T T N B ' RELL, CITY MANAG R Fiscal Impact: VIKI COPELAND, FINANCE DIRECTOR 7-15-02;12:53 ;SOUTH BAY GIONAL Iii S. B. R. P. C. A. South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority 4440 W. Broadway Hawthorne, CA 90250-3857 (310) 973-1802 Fax: (310) 978-0892 Fed ID: 95-3142825 To HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPT 540 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA.90254 ATT: ASST. CHIEF GOMEZ ;3SERV1U x Y ;H U t5 4 Quote No : 4334 Date : 03/25/2002 Facie 1 of 1 DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT QTY 4.0 UHF 450-512MHZ 20-40 WATT 1,788.57 7,154.28 MCS2000 RADIO PACKAGE 4.0 SOFTWARE, SERVICE PLAN AND ALL 51.45 205.80 OPTIONS. 4.0 B654 REMOTE MNT KIT W/17FT CBL 187.43 749.72 9.0 UHF MTs 2000 PORTABLE 1,769.86 15,928.74 9.0 SERVICE PLAN 37.80 340.20 PRICES SUBECT TO CHANGE 5.0 MOTORLA GPX 800MHZ PORTABLE 420.00 2,100.00 6.0 MOTOROLA MTS2000 PREMIUM BATT 150 71.37 428.21 15.0 LABOR FOR INSTALL (NONMEMBER) 47.50 712.50 1..0 MOTOROLA RACK CHARGER MTS2000 756.00 756.00 Subtotal 28, 375.45 Sales Tax 2, 282.19 Shipping & Handling 70.00 TOTAL 30,727.64 Facie 1 of 1 VENDORS: A) ' COMPANY : A D Qfkivc_ei) ADDRESS: CITY, STATE: TELEPHONE: ' QUOTE BY: tDE.C-i--tai=.-ice DEO/VERY CHARGE:YES NO EXPECTED DEL DATE: OUT OF STATE•._VENDOR : REQUEST TAX ADDED TO INVOICE YES CONTRACTORS ONLY: YES WORKERS COMP INSURANCE NO BUSINESS LICENSE: YES Iy0 (CONTRACTORS, LOCAL DELIVERY) B) COMPANY : ►V\_C ADDRESS: 13 CITY, STATE: `HCAs,Lit \ P -,E- TELEPHONE: QUOTE BY : p o,.� a=,4 ?G DELIVERY CHARGE:YES X NO EXPECTED DEL DATE: OUT OF STATE VENDOR: REQUEST TAX ADDED TO INVOICE YES'< CONTRACTORS ONLY: YES WORKERS COMP INSURANCE NO BUSINESS LICENSE: YES NO (CONTRACTORS, LOCAL DELIVERY) • .Sc') v i-1 "3 4- -1 e0 C C) COMPANY : C Ako,N..) t &A—) S - -t-4.0 2- rrc-7 DELIVERY CHARGE:YES,K NO ADDRESS:` L '"1 ..7 . -Ft EXPECTED DEL DATE: CITY, STATE: _ -n4-0 F C"�.. zso TELEPHONE: QUOTE BY: 3c)C73 F 140 F -A, BUSINESS LICENSE: YES NO OUT OF STATE VENDORS: REQUEST TAX ADDED TO INVOICE - YES CONTRACTORS ONLY: YES WORKERS COMP INSURANCE_ NO (CONTRACTORS, LOCAL DELIVERY) #ITEMS 11 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION coca n Cc-► 'ter;£ rt) IAoc c_E. Y >);e MCS So�Twa,Lr 5 Gt 2G,Ltcct VENDOR A EACH 'TOTAL tr�Cic3•ti, r � i ivC 5 Zoa cP-.4710s �Cit2rAYC f-_ Aker( 0 re. \\ L. te---FiO,c>S 0042..5? -k. 1\A0 T U,z G L4 C ri- 2k6 _ DERY / TAX - VENDOR B 1 VENDOR C 1 EACH TOTAL! EACH TOTAL) 7 {'Lr4P.3\,788.57 7,/6-1• 5-05-1-23-01 /N•5 • /2' b&.2112 / 87A3 7'P7. 24 sv /6,06",5-0�..�.�E $6 L, Lfo '4,312,001 eizO,oO Z!Oo.L'4 �3,5:c� 5"Gt,co .71.37 qz8_ Zr) 573( ?S 73,75 75.e •Co ZzD• Z.S 't6 t, VENDOR TOTALS l)QLt )P Z1 .�. 1 • 1 U t"'4 t< 34$�•�r<= Z,S-57 611 25 .4., c)9 • 70,001 • 2;24.2. 4 Thursday, August 1, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular meeting of August 13, 2002 AWARD OF FIRE DEPARTMENT APPARATUS PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council: 1. Award the Fire Department Apparatus Preventative Maintenance Program to Sepulveda's Fleet Service, Azusa, CA, in the amount of $31,655.00. 2. Appropriate $885.00 from the Equipment Replacement Fund for the program. BACKGROUND A Request for Proposals (RFP) was published and mailed soliciting bids from qualified vendors to furnish the Fire Department with specific annual preventative apparatus inspection and maintenance as detailed. A proactive approach to apparatus maintenance with proper record keeping is essential to limit Department liability and ensure apparatus reliability at or when responding to emergencies or otherwise. This is a new program for the Fire Department. Sepulveda's Fleet Service was the sole bid received. FISCAL impact City Council did approve the Fire Department Apparatus Preventative Maintenance Program for the 2002/2003 annual budget in the amount of $30,770.00. An additional appropriation of $885.00 is required to meet the bid amount. Respectfully submitted, Rr SELL TINGLEY, FIE HIEF Concur:. STE : U' RELL, CITY MANAGER Fiscal Impact: VIKI COPELAND, FINANCE DIRECTOR 21 • City Of Hermosa Beach Bid Request The City Of Hermosa Beach is soliciting sealed bids from qualified vendors to furnish the Fire Department with specific annual preventative fire apparatus inspection/maintenance as described below. All bids shall include all labor and anticipated parts cost for specified inspection of each identified apparatus listed below. In addition all bids shall include the vendors responsibilitylor transport of apparatus from Hermosa Fire Station to vendors facility and back. To be considered vendors must meet the following minimum qualifications: Maintenance and Service Technicians must be certified as recommended by NFPA 1071; Standard for Emergency Vehicle Technicians (EVT) with concurrent Master Level Certification with the National Institute for Automotive Service Excellence (ASE) • s Each inspection, repair or service must be conducted as outlined in NFPA 1915; Standard for Fire Apparatus Preventative Maintenance as well as to the California Highway Patrol Motor Carrier Safety Compliance Handbook HIM 84.6 37 point inspection format. Minimum Annual Preventative Maintenance required for all specified apparatus (as appropriate): • Twice Annual Bit Inspection Type "A" • Annual Bit Inspection Type "B" • Annual Bit Inspection Type "C" • Annual Pump Test • Annual Aerial Apparatus Inspection Fire apparatus requiring Annual. Preventative Maintenance bid: 1997 Smeal 55' Aerial Ladder Detroit V6 Allison 5 Speed 1250 Single Stage Centrifugal Pump Approx. Mileage 16,000 Pump hours 1909 2000 Pierce Dash Pumper Cummins V6 Turbo Allison 5 Speed 1500 Single Stage Centrifugal Pump Approx. Mileage 7,000 Pump Hours ? SUPPLEMENTAL 21 INFORMATION 1990 Pierce Pumper Detroit V6 Allison Transmission 1500 Single Stage Pump Approx. Mileage 34,000 Pump Hours ? 1996 FORD Ambulance V8 Gasoline, Automatic Approx. Mileage 50,000 1997 FORD Ambulance V8 Gasoline, Automatic Approx. Mileage 35,000 Submission of Proposals Sealed proposals must be received in the office of the City Clerk, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California, 90254, on or before 2:00 PM Thursday, July 25, 2002. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to extend any time frame as necessary. No late proposals will lie accepted. Late proposals received after the deadline will be returned to the bidder unopened. Proposals are to be submitted in a sealed envelope with the words, "PROPOSAL FOR FIRE APPARATUS PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE", written or typed on the envelope. Questions about this proposal can be directed to Assistant Fire Chief, Jerry Gomez at (310) 3180340 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BID OPENING LOG SHEET Project Name: Date: Page / of / Bidder's Name Anlount of Bid 1) / 6 6", 0-0 2) 3) 5) 6) Attest: ice of the City Clerk - 1315 Valley Drive - Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 July 23, 2002 Sepulveda's Fleet Service Fire Apparatus Specia Assistant Chief. Jerry Gomez Hermosa Beach Fire Department 540 Pier Ave. Hermosa Beach California, 90254-3885 Dear Jerry, 722 N. McKeever. Azusa. California. t RECEIVE alL2 52002► COY OF HERMOSA BEACH Thank you, for the opportunity to be apart of your maintenance evaluation program. Please find our provided services broken out to show maintenance operations and labor hours involved. Our labor rate for the coming year will be set at $ 70.00 per hour. Each inspection, repair or service is outlined as it applies to the NFPA 1915 Standard for Fire Apparatus Preventive Maintenance as well as to the California Highway Patrol Motor Carrier Safety Compliance Handbook HPH 84.6 Our Maintenance and Service Technicians hold recognized qualifications and certifications as' recommended by the NFPA 1071 Standard for Emergency Vehicle Technicians (EVT) with concurrent Master Level Certification with the National Institute for Automotive Service Excellence (ASE) Of further benefit to your Department is the fact that we are a factory authorized service center for E -One, Bronto Skylift, Saulsbury and Superior Fire Apparatus. Sepulveda's Fleet Service has over the past 20 Years established itself as a competent and efficient , Fire Apparatus Repair Facility and enjoys an excellent rapport with many Southern California Municipal and Commercial Fire departments. We look forward to providing you with the level of service and repair that you're fleet requires and demands. Owner �LrPT ER2Isbuily 722 N. McKeever I/ :1: usa California 91; 91702 a 626 331.00300Fax 626.63:3112.1 6 c mail jscpuIvcclzemindspring.com Bit Inspection Type 'A' Follow prescribed NFPA 1915 Standards and the 37 point California Highway Patrol , inspection format. Included in the inspection and encompassed in the labor charges will be all brake adjustments, tire pressure checks, pressure adjustments as well as a functionality test on all chassis and emergency lighting. Bit Inspection Type 'A' as described will be performed twice annually. Note: This service can be performed at the respective FD Station. Bit Inspection Type 'B' Follow prescribed NFPA-1915 Standards and the 37 point California Highway Patrol inspection format. Included in the inspection and encompassed in the labor charges will be all brake adjustments, tire pressure checks, pressure adjustments as well as a functionality test on all chassis and emergency lighting. Lubrication service provided to include Lube oil, filters and grease to all applicable grease fittings. Coolant and fuel filter services are included. Also included will be pump and valve functionality testing as well as vacuum testing per NFPA 1915 Standards to include intake & discharge systems as well as instrumentation and controls. Bit Inspection Type 'B' as described will be performed once annually. Note: This service will be performed in house only. Bit Inspection Type 'C' Follow prescribed NFPA-1915 Standards and the 37 point California Highway Patrol inspection format. Included are all levels of service and inspection cited in Bit inspection Type 'B' in addition to an all wheel off brake inspection so as to qualify all braking system components for damage and wear. Air brake pressure protection and inversion valves will be tested for functionality as well as visual and operational inspection of all valves, lines, cylinders and chambers as cited in NFPA-1925 chapters 3.12.7, 3.12.10, 3.12.10.1 and 3.12.10.3 Visual and functionality qualification of frame, suspension components, axles, bearings and seals to include leaf springs, pins and spring hangers. Bit Inspection Type 'C' as described will be performed once annually. Note: This service will be performed in house only. Annual Pump Draft Test As dictated by the NFPA-1915 Standards chapter 3-1. Pump service tests shall be conducted at least annually and whenever major repairs or modifications to the pump, power train or any component of the apparatus that is used in pump operations have been made. Our staff will transport the vehicle to a NFPA Certified Test Pit. All procedures shall be performed as cited by the NFPA-1915 Chapters 3-3.1 through 3-3.7 which cite subjection of the pump to a test of 40 minutes in duration. Consisting of 20 minutes at 100% rated capacity at 150 PSI, 10 minutes of pumping at 70% of rated capacity at 200psi and 10 minutes of pumping at 50% rated capacity at 250 PSI. Inclusive to the test are the qualifications of the pressure control system, a gauge and flow meter test, and tank to pump flow rate verification. Pump Draft Test as described will be performed once annually.. • Sepulveda's 2002 Hermosa Beach FD r Annual Aerial Apparatus Inspection Follow prescribed NFPA-1915 Standards as well as specific manufacturers qualification formats. Lubricate and inspect ladder sections, booms, platforms and cradling devices for structural integrity, mounting, deformation, wear, and alignment. Further inspection and lubrication to include lifting and extension cylinders, attachments, cabling system, and holding devices as well as the turntable and rotation bearing. Also included in the inspection as dictated by NFPA-1915 chapters 5.3, 5.4, 5.4.I, 5.4.3, 55, 5.6 and 5.7 shall be the qualification and inspection of the outriggers and stabilization system, hydraulic system, pump, motor, and control systems to include hydraulic fluid and filter change, the exercise and verification of the warning system, lighting system and interlock system. This service also covers the waterway inspection and lubrication. Aerial Apparatus Inspection as described will be performed once annually. Transmission service Transmission service as dictated by NFPA-1915 Chapter 3.9.4 shall be serviced in accordance with the manufacturer's severe service recommendation. Allison Transmission's recommended severe service intervals are as follows: WT series ( World Transmission) HD or MD ; Complete fluid change with replacement of main filters at 12,000 Miles or 500 hours. Which ever comes fist. Internal Pump Filter ; change at 40,00 miles or Annually. HT Series all models ; Complete fluid change with replacement of main filters at 25,000 Miles or 600 Hotrs. Which ever comes first. Air Dryer Service Service desiccant cartridge or other drying media as per the manufacturers specification. Service associated check valves, purge valves and or cut-off valves as indicated by the air dryer model. Test System. Miscellaneous Emergency Repairs / Road Service: Will be charged at our hourly rate, portal to portal. After hours service can be provided at one and a half times our shop rate. Computer Diagnostic Repair: Available for Allison, Detroit Diesel, Cummins, and Navistar as well as most associated Fire Apparatus computer systems. Charged Hourly. Welding Service: Stainless Steel, Aluminum, Steel, Brass, Sheet Metal. Structural and Non- Structural Welding and fabrication service. Charged hourly. Major repairs: Will be quoted in accordance to your needs to facilitate budgeting and the timely return of the vehicle to service. Sepulveda's 2002 Hermosa Beach F1) Please find our pricing as dictated by type and quantity of equipment in your fleet. 1) Straight Pumper, Two Axle Engine. $7,470.00 for each Straight Pumper in your fleet. Total cost annually $14,940.00 for two known engines in your fleet. Included in our pricing are two Type A' Inspections, one Type B' Inspection, one Type C' Inspection and one annual pump test. > The replacement of all batteries, belts, Air Dryer service, Transmission service, as well as a full brake service to include all applicable components and parts. > All fluids and filters. II) Aerial Apparatus, Three Axle Trucks. $9,155.00 for each Aerial Truck in your fleet. Total cost annually $9,155.00 for one known Truck in your fleet. Included in our pricing are two Type A' Inspections, one Type B' Inspection, one Type C' Inspection, one Annual Pump Test and one Aerial / Service Inspection. > The replacement of all batteries, belts, Air Dryer service, Transmission service, as well as a full brakeservice to include all applicable components and parts. All fluids and filters. III) Ambulance. $3,780.00 for each Ambulance in your fleet. Total cost annually of $7,560.00 for the two known Ambulances in your fleet. Included in our pricing are two Type A' Inspections, one Type B' Inspection and one Type C' Inspection. > The replacement of all batteries, belts, Air Dryer service, Transmission service, as well as a full brake service to include all applicable components and parts. ➢ All fluids and filters. In closing please find our total calculated proposal to include items I, II, III. To be in the amount of $ 31,655.00 annually Also please note any additional repairs and or parts will be added as extra. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Recommendation: • August 6, 2002 Regular Meeting of August 13, 2002 AWARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES It is recommended that the City -Council: 1. Award a Professional Services Agreement to AAE, Inc. for providing City Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning Services for a not -to -exceed fee of $18,000; 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the attached Professional Services Agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3.. Authorize Staff to negotiate an agreement with AAE, Inc. for services in FY 2003-04; and 4. Approve the acquisition of additional services by individual Task Order. Background: The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Stevens -Garland Associates (SGA) for City Traffic Engineering Services expired on June 30, 2002. Richard Garland of SGA has taken a full time position with the City of Carson; therefore, he is no longer available to serve the City. Staff has determined that, in order to meet the required level of traffic engineering servicesfor the City, the services of a Traffic Engineering Consultant are needed. Staff sent out ten RFP's to firms Staff felt were qualified and would be interested in the assignment. Proposals were received from the following firms: FIRM CITY PROPOSED HOURLY RATE AAE, Inc. Brea, CA $80.00 NBCE, Inc. Tustin, CA $80.00 Analysis: Staff evaluated each proposal on the basis of the scope of services, similar assignments, resumes of key personnel and hourly rates. The consulting firm AAE, Inc. was chosen by Staff as the firm best able to provide the required services. 2m AAE is committing the services. of Mr. Raymond Abassi, a. registered Traffic Engineer in California with over 20 years of experience, to fulfill the duties of the City's Traffic Engineer. Mr. Abassi is also a certified Professional Traffic Operations Engineer and a registered Civil Engineer in California. He holds a Master's Degree in Transportation. AAE has worked with a number of cities assisting them as city traffic engineer in the resolution of traffic problems involving circulation, control, safety, and residential/commercial impacts. AAE has also conducted traffic studies and recommended mitigation measures fora number of public and private developments. Currently, they provide Transportation/Traffic Engineering Services to cities such as Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, El Segundo, Diamond Bar, La Puente, Baldwin park, Irwindale, Anaheim and Costa Mesa. Since AAE has the capability to provide a wide range of engineering services, Staff is requesting approval to acquire additional services by Task Order issued at the appropriate time for a Council -approved budget item. Fiscal Impact: Since the FY 2002-03 budget has provided for contracting for City Traffic Engineering Services, there will be no additional costs. The Task Orders will be charged to the specific, approved account. Attachments: 1. Sample Task Order with Hourly Rate Schedule 2. Professional Services Agreement Respectfully submitted: arold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: F:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\traffic engineering services 02-03 6-11-02.doc 2 Citi of .21ermosa rl3each TASK ORDER NOTICE To PROCEED Project Task Order No. Project No. CIP Date: , 2001 Consultant's Job No. You ARE HEREBY REQUESTED TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING SERVICES: DETAILS OF WORK: PURSUANT TO ARTICLE I - SCOPE OF WORK, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND CONSULTANT TIME OF PERFORMANCE: WORK IS AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE ON THE DATE OF THIS PROJECT TASK ORDER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED AS DIRECTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OR HIS DESIGNEE. ATTACHMENT 1 NOTICE TO PROCEED CONTRACT TASK ORDER NO. PAGE 2 COMPENSATION: PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 2, THE RATE OF COMPENSATION FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED FEE SCHEDULE. THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION SHALL NOT EXCEED WITHOUT WRITTEN AMENDMENT HERETO. UNDER PROVISIONS OF: CONTRACT NO. DATED RECEIVED: DATE: CONSULTANT: ADDRESS: BY: THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA BY: STEPHEN R. BURRELL, CITY MANAGER F:\B95\PWFILES\Tristan\Task Orders\task order blank.doc HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE AAE Incorporated As of January 1, 2002 Civil Engineering Principal -in -Charge City Engineer Corporate Chief Engineer Project Manager Sr. Engineer Associate Engineer Engineering Assistant Engineering Technician urveying Surveyor Party Chief Survey Crew - 2 person Survey Crew - 3 person Survey Analyst Man instruction agement .:: Principal -in -Charge Construction Manager Project Scheduler/Controller Resident Engineer Construction Inspector (Certified I B.S.) $ Construction Inspector $ CAD Manager CAD Operator Sr. CAD Operator $ Admin /;.Human Resources 154.00 Principal -in -Charge $ 115.00 Corporate Trainer $ 135.00 H.R. Director / Administrator $ 115.00 Sr. Analyst $ 100.00 Analyst $ 75.00 Clerk Typist $ 65.00 50.00 Traffic Engineering` 95.00 Principal -in -Charge 165.00 Sr. Traffic Engineer 190.00 Traffic Engineer 80.00 Associate Engineer Engineering Technician 154.00 200.00 120.00 85.00 70.00 52.00 154.00 100.00 85.00 75.00 50.00 Program Management ;. 154.00 Principal -in -Charge 95.00 Sr. Analyst 94.00 Public Relations Officer 90.00 Tech Writer 60.00 Clerk Typist / Word 49.00 Other;Charges 85.00 Mileage 60.00 Travel 75.00 Reimbursements 154.00 85.00 70.00 65.00 52.00 0.38/Mile Cost + 15% Cost + 15% Additional billing classifications may be added to the above list though out the year as new positions are created. The above schedule is for straight time. Overtime will be charged at 1.25 times. Sundays and Holidays are charged at 1.7 times the standard rates. • • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PSA No. 02.008 THIS AGREEMENT, made and . entered into this 13th day of August, 2002 at Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, through its duly elected, qualified and acting MAYOR, hereinafter called the CITY, and AAE, Inc., hereinafter called the CONSULTANT. WITNESSETH: That the CONSULTANT for and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the CITY herein expressed, does hereby agree to furnish to the CITY professional services and materials, as- follows: s-follows: ARTICLE I - Scope of Work CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to CITY the services set forth in the plans and specifications or the scope of work attached as Exhibit "A". ARTICLE II - Costs The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or any part of the work performed under this Agreement at the rates and in the manner established in the attached Bid Proposal. Total expenditure made under this contract shall not exceed the sum of $18,000.00. This fee includes all expenses, consisting of all incidental blueprinting, photography, travel, and miscellaneous costs, estimated . to be. accrued during the life of the contract. It also includes any escalation or inflation factors anticipated. No increase in fees will be allowed during the life of the contract Any increase in contract amount or scope shall be by express written amendment approved by the CITY and CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for costs incurred in the performance hereof as are allowable under the provisions of Part 1-14 of the Federal Procurement Regulations. ARTICLE III - Method of Payment CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed monthly in arrears based upon the hourly services provided. CONSULTANT'shall 'submit invoices in triplicate and addressed to the CITY, c/o the Finance Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254- 3884. ATTACHMENT 2 ARTICLE IV - Subcontracting CONSULTANT shall not be permitted to subcontract any portion of this contract without the express written consent of the CITY. ARTICLE V - Completion Date CONSULTANT shall commence work under this agreement upon execution of this agreement and shall complete the work according to the schedule submitted as part of Exhibit "A", however, the CITY's Director of Public Works may extend the completion -date as required by the scope of this contract. Any contract time extension shall require the express written consent of the Director of Public Works. ARTICLE VI - Accounting Records CONSULTANT must maintain accounting records and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred which records and documents shall. be kept available at the CONSULTANT's California office during the contract period and thereafter for three years from the date of final payment of Federal funds hereunder. ARTICLE VII - Ownership of Data. All data, maps, photographs, and other material collected or prepared under the contract shall become the property of the CITY. ARTICLE VIII - Termination This contract may be terminated at any time for breach and the CITY .may. terminate unilaterally and without cause upon seven (7) days written notice to the. CONSULTANT. All work satisfactorily performed pursuant to the contract and prior to the date oftermination may be claimed for reimbursement. ARTICLE IX - Assignability CONSULTANT shall not assign or transfer interest in this contract without the prior written consent of the CITY. ARTICLE X - Amendment It is mutually understood and agreed that no alteration or variation of the terms of this contract, or any subcontract requiring the approval of the CITY, shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties hereto, and approved by all necessary parties. • ARTICLE XI - Non -Solicitation Clause The CONSULTANT warrants that he or she has not employed or retained any company or persons, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this .warranty, the CITY shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. ARTICLE XII - Equal Opportunity Assurance During the performance of this contract, the CONSULTANT agrees as follows: A. The CONSULTANT will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, sex, creed, color or national origin. The CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, sex, creed, color or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising;':; layoffs or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. B. - The CONSULTANT will, in all solicitations or advertisements fora employees placed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, state that all qualified:;. applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, sex, creed, color or national origin. C. The CONSULTANT will permit access to their books, records and accounts by the applicant agency, the State, the Federal Highway Administration and/or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with this nondiscrimination clause. D. In the event of the CONSULTANT's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract, this contract may be canceled, terminated or suspended in whole or in part. ARTICLE XIII - Clean Air Act During the performance of this Contract, the CONSULTANT agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1857 et seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) as amended. ARTICLE XIV - Indemnity CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify the CITY, its officers, employees and agents against, and will hold and save each of them harmless from, any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision or other organization arising out of the negligent acts or intentional tortious acts, errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees, provided for herein. CONSULTANT will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees incurred in connection herewith. CONSULTANT will promptly pay any judgment rendered against CITY, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities. In the event CITY, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against CONSULTANT for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the sole negligence of CONSULTANT hereunder, CONSULTANT agrees to pay CITY, its officers, agents, or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by CITY, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to reasonable attorney's fees. ARTICLE XV - Insurance A. Without limiting CONSULTANT'S obligations arising under ARTICLE XIV - Indemnity , CONSULTANT shall not begin work under this Agreement until it obtains policies of insurance required under this section. The insurance shall cover CONSULTANT, its agents, representatives and employees in connection with the performance of work under this Agreement, and shall be maintained throughout the- ,.. term of this Agreement. Insurance coverage shall be as follows: i. Automobile Liability Insurance with minimum coverages of $500,000 for property. damage, $500,000 for injury to one. person/single occurrence, and $500,000 for injury to more than one person/single occurrence. ii. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance, insuring CITY its elected and appointed officers, agents, and employees from claims for damages for personal injury, including death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise from CONSULTANT'S actions under this Agreement, whether or not done by CONSULTANT or anyone directly or indirectly employed by CONSULTANT. Such insurance shall have a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000. iii. Worker's Compensation Insurance for all CONSULTANT'S employees to the extent required by the State of California. B. Deductibility Limits for policies referred to in subparagraphs A (i) (ii) and (iii) shall not exceed $5,000 per occurrence. • C. Additional Insured. City, its elected and appointed officers, agents, and employees shall be named as additional insureds on policies referred to in subparagraphs A (i) and (ii). D. Primary Insurance. The insurance required in paragraphs A (i) (ii) and (iv) shall be primary and not excess coverage. E. Evidence of Insurance. Consultant shall furnish CITY, prior to the execution of this Agreement, satisfactory evidence of the insurance required, issued by an insurer authorized to do business in California, and an endorsement to each such policy of insurance evidencing that each carrier is required to give CITY at least 30 days prior written notice of the cancellation of any policy during the effective period of the Agreement. All required insurance policies are subject to approval of the City Attorney. Failure on the part of CONSULTANT to procure or maintain said insurance in full force and effect shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement or procure or renew such insurance, and pay any premiums therefor at CONSULTANT'S expense. ARTICLE XVI - Enforcement of Agreement In the event that legal action is commenced to enforceor declare the rights::: created under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of costs:; and reasonable attorney's fees in the amount to be determined by the court. ARTICLE XVII - Conflicts of Interest No member of the governing body of the CITY and no other officer, employee, or agent of the CITY who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the. planning and carrying out of theprogram, shall have any personal financial interest,. director indirect, in this Agreement; and the CONSULTANT further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed. ARTICLE XVIII - Independent CONSULTANT The CONSULTANT is and shall at all times remain as to the CITY a wholly independent consultant. Neither the CITY nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of the CONSULTANT or any of the CONSULTANT's employees, except as herein set forth. The CONSULTANT shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the CITY. ARTICLE XIX - Entire Agreement of the Parties This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the employment of CONSULTANT by CITY and contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect such employment in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Agreement 5 • acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement or amendment hereto shall be effective unless executed in writing and signed by both CITY and CONSULTANT. ARTICLE XX - Governing Law This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable federal statutes and regulations as amended. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT MAYOR: Mayor, City of Hermosa Beach AAE, Inc. ATTEST: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 6 F:\B95\PWFILES\PSA\02.008 AAE traffic eng 8-13-02.doc SCOPE OF WORK AAE Incorporated will perform the following duties and functions related to City traffic engineering, including but not limited to: A. Perform required analyses and develop plans for traffic studies to be undertaken by the City, and make recommendations for in-house or contracted performance. Direct/ coordinate the conduct of studies and review and comment on studies. B. Review Community and Private Development Plans for traffic impact. New developments within the City will be required to have a traffic impact report. As City Traffic Engineer, AAE will coordinate the development of the traffic impact report and review/ comment on the document. C. The City Traffic Engineer will develop an understanding of potential traffic problems and provide mitigation measures for consideration by the City. D. The City Traffic Engineer may participate in City Planning Commission meetings and provide reports of current traffic improvement activities consistent with the City's General Plan. E. The City Traffic Engineer will participate in all of the Public Works Departments meetings and be prepared to discuss traffic related safety issues, and provide recommendations for improvements where applicable. F. The City Traffic Engineer will perform a semi-annual review of traffic conditions within the City, and prepare a report for the Public Works Director as to the conditions and recommendations for improved circulation and safety. Page 10 of 15 V:\AAE Pvlat;<ehng\Proposals-Brea'Herrnosa Beach Engineering Services- T EO2-01 kTEXT.doc EXHIBIT A • G. The City Traffic Engineer will provide leadership for the City Traffic Engineering staff and work with them in established procedures for traffic databank, and for compliance with City traffic issues. H. The City Traffic Engineer will provide for the preparation of traffic control plans for community and private development projects. Review and approve prepared traffic control plans consistent with City requirements. I. The City Traffic Engineer, upon request of the City Attorney, will review pending litigation, research conditions and make comments for the attorney's consideration. J. The City Traffic Engineer will perform additional duties as may be delegated by the Public Works Director or City Officials. This could include preparation of PS&E's, construction oversight, and the preparation of Request for Proposals (RFP) pertaining to traffic studies, plans and construction. K. The City Traffic Engineer will be responsible for the capital improvement projects covering signalization, signing, striping, and pavement markings: This includes the coordination, review and approval of plans created by others. L. The City Traffic Engineer will work closely with and coordinate traffic engineering activities with other city departments, as well as, County of Los Angeles, California State Department of Transportation and utilities as required. V:IAAE /WarketingProposals-Bread-lert»osa Beach Engineering Sen ices- TE02-011TEXT.doe Page 11 of 15 August 7, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 13, 2002 BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT REQUEST FOR SEPTEMBER 11 COMMEMORATIVE PROGRAM ON THE MUNICIPAL PIER Recommendation Staff recommends that Council approve the request from the Beach Cities Health District (BCHD) to: 1. Use the end of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier from 7:30 AM — 9:00 AM for a commemorative program on the first anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks. 2. Waive fees as requested. 3. Approve the closure of the Pier to fishing and other uses for the duration of the set-up and event. Background At the meeting of August 6, 2002, the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission approved the request from BCHD to hold this event. The commemorative program would consist of a flag salute, color guard, patriotic songs, and speeches, culminating in a moment of 'silence at 8:45 AM. Analysis The City has anticipated that there would be event approvals requested for this day. In addition to the BCHD event, the Civic Theater has been reserved by Harvest House Ministries for a nighttime event honoring public safety personnel. The BCHD event will provide Hermosa Beach residents with an opportunity to participate in a commemorative event in town and will providea format for civic leaders to address the community on September 11. While staff recommends fee waivers as requested, an insurance certificate and indemnifications will be required. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE Attachments: Written request and event application Respectfully submitted, Mary Direct r, Community Resources Conc Steu n'.Burre1 City Manager r4. VecteL V,ttgA-- Thtrict BCHD APUBLIC EMRY July 15, 2002 Lisa Lynn, Recreation Supervisor Department of Community Resources City of Hermosa Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Lisa: As per our conversation today, I have enclosed an Special Event Application to request the use of the Hermosa Beach Pier on Wednesday, September 11 from 8 to 8:45 a.m. I am also requesting to have the fees waived for this event. Beach Cities Health District plans to host a short program to commemorate the 1 -year anniversary of the terrorist attacks. September 11 will not be an ordinary day. We hope to offer the community an opportunity to pay their respects before continuing on with their lives and their day-to-day activities. Sam Edgerton, who will be mayor of Hermosa Beach on that day, has agreed to serve as Master of Ceremonies. Other confirmed guests include Glen Komatsu, MD, Director of Bioethics at Little Company of Mary, and the Rev. Chris Cannon, Kings Harbor Church and member of the Beach Cities Health District Board of Directors, who will give the invocation. We have also invited the Redondo Union High School Color Guard, a choir who will lead the group in patriotic songs, veteran representatives and students from a Hermosa school who will lead the group in the Pledge of Allegiance. The program will end with a moment of silence at 8:45 a.m.; the time the first plane hit the first tower. Please consider allowing the fees for this event to be waived. This event does not involve exchange of money. Participants will not be charged to attend the event and guest speakers will not be paid for their participation. We are hoping the City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources will aid in this effort by donating the use of the end of the Pier as a community service. 514 N. Prospect Avenue 3rd Floor Redondo Beach, CA 90277 (310) 374-3426 FAX (310) 376-4738 www.bchd.org BOARD OF DIRECTORS Gil Abdalian, M.S., M.B.A. Chris Cannon Carol C. Frey, M.D. Vanessa I. Poster Jo Woodward, R.N.N.P. We are excited about giving community members an opportunity to pay its respects to those impacted by this world -changing event. We hope the City of Hermosa Beach would like to join us by taking part in this ceremony. Thank you so much for your assistance in making this a meaningful event. Best wishes, 0 BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT Paula Van Doren Program Development Administrator CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0280 Fax (310)372-4333 Organization's Name: aerl r ��'� \, Q S tf-��`T''\, 15--176-et Profit Non profit J Non profit ID Address: �-� . r05632 XX City:V P. Lo 1—\ (j ,o 9 a__(:.. Phone: loo State cn- 3(0 ZIP 7 7 3-7(.147'� Contact Person/Title: Address: City: Day Phone: Brief description of event: State Eve Phone ZIP 91 t COvY1;14e � 0-41--Ye-c44, Qb.Ae,e_e Dates of Event: Location of Event: Set up /Tear down Time & Dates: Time Event will begin: (_ 7>.0 0 0 . /p7 Time event will end: Number of Participants (including volunteers): Anticipated number of spectators: Number of Vehicles/Trucks: K., 50 _\n Description of set up for this event (Attach diagram, if necessary): siy,Aiik .5+021-c ay\--Ilks. exic-J. 0f, 9-k_k_. S (AO 0 rS J �c'� tG! ,btt1Lk Additional information/requests (be specific): Art t. ca7b b Y� f u'I S f t • sfa s - tcraavli erVelk . 3.C. c a;tr5 w• lC 4 -rioe J -mom' I� • --t'o rQ • Application Fee Permit Fee Film • Set-up/Tear-down Co-sponsors Amplification Permit Banner(s) Police Fire Public Works Parking Other Costs Total Due - $500 Insurance Required (For Staff Use Only): Yes No Received Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa Beach evidence of $2 million comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees as additional insured. Permittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents, and employees, for fees or damages caused, arising but of or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICANTS' LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE, INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND OR FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH PARTIES- )v,v, Company Representative Date Permit to be processed through City Council YES NO Department of Community Resources Date Police Department Date Fire Department. Date Li e\se �? Lbs -z_ • /00 July 31, 2002 City Council Meeting August 13, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 02-1222 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 8.12.360, GARBAGE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL - MANDATORY FEE COLLECTION, REMOVING THE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR FILING AN ALTERNATIVE BILLING APPLICATION (PAYMENT BY TENANT)." Submitted for adoption and waiver of full reading is Ordinance No. 02-1222, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of July 23, 2002, the ordinance was presented to Council for consideration, was amended, and was then introduced by the following vote: AYES: Edgerton, Keegan, Reviczky, Yoon, Mayor Dunbabin NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Elaine Doerlling, City CI/k Noted: Step ' . Burrell, City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 02-1222 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 8.12.360, GARBAGE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL - MANDATORY FEE COLLECTION, REMOVING THE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR FILING AN ALTERNATIVE BILLING APPLICATION (PAYMENT BY TENANT) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 8.12.360 (B) 6. is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of the City, and shall make minutes of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 13th day of August, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council 4/64D-_. July 25, 2002 Regular Meeting August 13, 2002 SUBJECT: CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) PURPOSE: Adopt resolution certifying compliance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) pursuant to California Government Code Section 65089 Recommendation: Adopt the attached Resolution certifying compliance with Congestion Management Program. Background: Proposition 111 requires that each city adopt and implement a Transportation Demand Management Plan. As a result, cities must provide annual documentation that they are in compliance with the State mandated CMP program which provides a link between development, transportation and air quality through trip reduction and transportation measures. Analysis: Using the mathematical formulas provided by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, staff has prepared the Local Implementation Report (LIR) which indicates that the City is in compliance with State requirements (Please see attached report.). The City had a total of 8,851 credits. after subtracting the debits as a result of residential and commercial development in the calendar year 01-02, a total of 8,463 remains. Thus, at this time no transportation or traffic improvement measures are required under the Congestion Management Program. Sol Blumenfe Community CONCUR D ector velopment Department Step urrell, City Manager Attachments: 1. Resolution• 2. Local Implementation Report Michael Schubach, City Planner CmpO2report Sa CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 02- 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089 Whereas, the City Council held a public hearing on August 13, 2002 to consider oral and written testimony and made the following factual Findings: 1. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), acting as the Congestion Management Program Agency for Los Angeles County adopted the Congestion Management Program in November 1997. 2. The adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements. 3. The adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP Local Implementation Report. NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THE FOLLOWING: SECTION 1. The City has taken all of the following actions, and is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 1997 CMP as amended. 1. The City has prepared 'traffic counts for the planning period and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter. 2. The City has adopted and continues to implement a Transportation Demand Management Ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management Chapter. 3. The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program Chapter. 4. The City has adopted a Local Implementation Report, attached hereto and made a part hereof, .consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP. This report balances 29 2 4 5 6 7 8 • 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 • 25 26 27 28 29 traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City with transportation improvements, and demonstrates that the City is meeting its responsibilities under tkie County Deficiency Plan. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this l3`h day of August, 2002 President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CmpO2reso CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY HERMOSA BEACH Date Prepared: 2002 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1,2001 - MAY 31,2002 Contact: MICHAEL SCHUBACH Phone Number: 310 318-0242 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY 25 -Jul -02 2000 DEFICIENCY PLAN STATUS SUMMARY 1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal [from Section I] Exempted Dwelling Units #VALUE! • Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s) #VALUE! • (388) 2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims [from Section II] Land Use Strategy Claims 0 Capital Improvement Claims 0 Transit Claims 0 TDM Claims 0 Total Strategies Claimed 0 0 Subtotal Current Credit (Goal) 388 3. Carryover Credit from Last Year's (2001) Local Implementation Report 8,851 Net Deficiency Plan Credit Balance: 8,463 CMP0102SUM • Section I, Page 1 Hermosa Beach Date Prepared: 2002 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 2001 - MAY 31, 2002 • SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT 25 -Jul -02 PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Dwelling Units Debit Value/DU Debits Single Family Residential 42.00 x 6.80 = 286 Multi -Family Residential 12.00 x 4.76 = 57 Group Quarters 0.00 x 1.98 = 0 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Debit Value/1000SF Debits Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 22.23 = 0 Commercial. (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 17.80 = 0 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 x 66.99 = 0 NON -RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Debit Value/1000SF Debits Lodging 42.50 x 7.21 = 306 Industrial 0.00 x . 6.08 = 0 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ff.) _ 0.00 x 16.16 = 0 Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 10.50 = 0 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 7.35 = 0 Medical 0.00 x 16.90 = 0 Government 0.00 x -20.95 = 0 Institutional/Educational 0.00 x 7.68. = 0 University 0.00 x 1.66 = 0 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description (Attach additional sheets if necessar Daily Trips 0 Debit Value/Trip Debits ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x ` 0.71 = 0 Subtotal New Development Activity = 649 Adjustments (Optional) - Complete Part 2 0 = 261 Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal (Points) = (388) Section I, Page 2 Hermosa Beach Date Prepared: 25 -Jul -02 2002 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1,2001 - MAY 31, 2002 SECTION 1- NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued) Enter information where it says "Enter." If not applicable, enter "0" so it will total. PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that were.both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure within the reporting period. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Dwelling Units - Adjustment Value/DU Subtotal Single Family Residential 23.00 x 6.80 = 156 Multi -Family Residential 22.00 x 4.76 = 105 Group Quarters 0.00 x 1.98 = 0 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Adjustment Value/1000SF Subtotal Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft,) 0.00 x 22.23 = 0 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 17.80 = 0 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 x 66.99 = 0 NON -RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Adjustment Value/1000SF Subtotal Lodging 0.00 x 7.21 = 0 Industrial 0.00 x 6.08 = 0 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 16.16 = 0 Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 10.50 = 0 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 7.35 = 0 Medical 0.00 x 16.90 = 0 Government 0.00 x 20.95 = 0 Institutional/Educational 0.00 x 7.68 = 0 University 0.00 x 1.66 = 0 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Description (Attach additional sheets if necessar Daily Trips 0 Adjustment Value/Trip Subtotal ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0 ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0 Total Mitigation Goal Adjustments (Points) = 261 Section I, Page 3 August 5, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council August 13, 2002 CONTINUED FROM THE MEETING OF MAY 28, AND JULY 23, 2002 (PURSUANT TO THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST) SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 02-1 - APPEAL LOCATION: 1100 THE STRAND APPELLANT: PEIER MANGURIAN, "SCOTTY'S" RESTAURANT REQUEST: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 1100 THE STRAND, "SCOTTY'S", AND CONSIDERATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (THE REQESTED AMENDMENTS THAT WERE DENIED WERE FOR ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL; TO ADD BAR SEATING IN THE PATIO AREA; TO ADD AMPLIFIED LIVE ENTERTAINMENT; A TAKE-OUT FOOD SERVICE WINDOW; AND 24- HOUR OPERATION.) THE APPEAL INCLUDES PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE INITIAL REQUEST TO LIMIT HOURS OF OPERATION TO BETWEEN 6:00 A.M. AND 1:00 A.M, TO LIMIT LIVE ENTERTAINMENT TO NON -AMPLIFIED, AND TO REDUCE THE BAR SEATING AREA. Planning Commission Recommendation: To deny the requested Conditional Use Permit Amendment. The Commission has not reviewed the modifications to the amendment as proposed by the applicant in the appeal. Background: ZONING: C-2, Restricted Commercial GENERAL PLAN: General Commercial FLOOR AREA: 5,500 Square Feet (Approximately) PARKING: 23 Spaces (4 In Tandem) ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Mitigated Negative Declaration At their meeting of April 16, 2002 the Planning Commission voted 5:0 to deny the requested CUP amendment based on concerns regarding noise, and increased intensity of use which could increase crowds and parking demand. The appeal filed by the applicant on April 25, 2002 proposes modifications to the project denied by the Commission as follows: 5b • • ❑ To limit the hours of operation to between 6:00 A.M. and 1:00 A.M ❑ To provide non amplified entertainment only ❑ To reduce the bar area ("for dining customers only") ❑ To provide a railing at the property line along the Strand for queuing of customers within the property. At their meeting of March 14, 2002, the Staff Environmental Review Committed recommended a mitigated negative declaration based on the findings in the Initial Study. The mitigation measure pertains to potentially significant noise impacts, and would require sound -proofing the glass - enclosed patio area or limiting live entertainment to acoustic music only. History In 1985, the City Council granted, on appeal, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for beer and wine in conjunction with a restaurant at the subject location. In 1988, the Planning Commission granted an amendment to the CUP to expand the floor area of the restaurant by adding 2,000 square feet of open-air seating. In 1989, the Planning Commission approved an amendment to enclose the outside dining area. In 1993, the City Council, on appeal, approved an amendment to allow On -sale General Alcohol, live entertainment, and 24-hour operation of the facility. This approved amendment was never executed and has now expired. In 1999 the Planning Commission considered an amendment similar to the current request without the request for 24-hour operation and a walk- up takeout window and denied the request. The applicant filed an appeal and then subsequently withdrew the appeal. Analysis The applicant is proposing to amend an existing CUP that is limited to beer and wine sales, to add full general on -sale alcohol. The requested amendment includes the addition of non -amplified live entertainment and modifying the approved floor plan to add bar seating and a dance floor and a walk- up take-out window. The application also requests modification to the hours of operation (currently limited to between 7:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M. based on the 1989 CUP) to extend alcohol sales between 6:00 A.M. and 1:00 A.M. These requests involve change of operation and minor alterations to the interior floor plans, and no expansion to the building. Section 17.04 of the Zoning Ordinance defines restaurant as an establishment primarily selling prepared foods and containing kitchen facilities used for food preparation and sets out percentages for gross sales computed monthly for prepared foods and alcohol sales. To partially address the Planning Commission's concerns the applicant's appeal includes modifications as noted and a statement that the bar seating area would be reduced, but no plans have been submitted to show the extent of that reduction. The applicant is proposing to alter the interior of the existing restaurant with respect to the seating arrangement (no increase in occupancy) and to add a bar area and a piano for live entertainment. The subject building is located within the downtown district and suitable for the proposed use. It is similar to other restaurants in the area which have live entertainment. However, the use is located approximately 1/2 block to the south of the westerly end of Pier Plaza, and there is potential that the added noise from live entertainment may present a problem for surrounding residents. At the previous hearings on this matter before Planning Commission, several residents complained that noise and disturbances from restaurants at closing time have created a nuisance in the area, though the complaints were not necessarily connected to the operation of Scotty's restaurant. They also expressed concern about the number of alcohol/entertainment type establishments in the downtown area. If the application is approved, the problem of noise generated by proposed live entertainment should be addressed with appropriate mitigation measures to address these concerns. The noise from the entertainment cannot be easily mitigated given its proposed location within a glass patio enclosure, which contains sliding glass windows, and since there is no air conditioning, the sliding windows will likely be left open during the summer months. Therefore, typical Conditions of Approval for other similar establishments, that require double -glazed windows, air conditioning and that doors and windows remain shut when live entertainment occurs would not appear to be adequate. Therefore, if approved, staff would recommend that entertainment be specifically limited to acoustic music as now proposed by the applicant. The plans do not clearly show the location for the proposed take-out window, but the applicant indicates that it would be at the northwest corner of the dining area, with access directly out toward the Strand. Any lines forming at the take out window would encroach in to the Strand right-of-way. Since customers can order take-out inside from the hostess station next to the waiting area, it does not seem appropriate to create this potential conflict with bicycle and pedestrian trafficon the Strand. To address this issue the applicant indicates in the appeal request that a railing would be provided parallel with the Strand for queuing to occur within the 6 -foot building setback. No plans have been submitted to show the location of the take-out window or the proposed railing. en Robertson Associate Planner Sol B umenfel Comm nity D City anager Director velop -nt Department /,.b, / Step411. urre 1, Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution to sustain the Commission's denial 2. 4/25 appeal letter / application 3. Planning Commission Resolution & Minutes 4. Location and Noticing Map 5. Correspondence Cup 1 10Othestrand 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 115 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION, ON APPEAL, TO DENY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 1100 THE STRAND, "SCOTTY'S", FOR ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL; TO ADD BAR SEATING IN THE PATIO AREA; TO ADD AMPLIFIED LIVE ENTERTAINMENT; A TAKE-OUT FOOD SERVICE WINDOW; AND 24-HOUR OPERATION AT 1100 THE STRAND . Section 1. An application was filed by Pete Mangurian, owner of Scotty's Restaurant, seeking amendment to an existing conditional use permit to allow on -sale alcohol; live entertainment; a take- out food service window; 24-hour operation and alterations to the floor plan in conjunction with an existing restaurant. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for the Conditional Use Permit on April 16, 2002, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered. by the Planning Commission. Based on the evidence the Commission denied the requested Conditional Use Permit based on the finding as set forth in P.C. Resolution 02-18. Section 3. The applicant filed an appeal of the Commission's decision including modifications to the initial request. The modifications are to limit hours of operation to between 6:00 A.M. and 1:00 A.M., to limit live entertainment to non -amplified, to reduce the bar seating area, and to provide a property line railing at the take-out window for queuing of customers within the boundaries of the property. Section 4. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the appeal and modifications on May 28, July 23, and August 13, 2002, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the City Council. Section 5. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, and the record of the decision of the Planning -Commission the City Council agrees with and makes the findings as contained in P.C. Resolution 02-18 which are incorporated herein by reference. Section 6. Based on the foregoing, the City Council sustains the decision of the Planning Commission and hereby denies the Conditional Use Permit. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK . CITY ATTORNEY -1- STUDIO ARCHITECTURE Patrick J. Killen A.I.A. April 25, 2002 Department. of Community Development Sol Blumenfeld City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 re: Scotty's on the Strand Restaurant 1100 The Strand Hermosa Beach, Ca Dear Sol, ri1'l1elisEl 2002 CITY :Y CLERK OF NERmosA d[R.c!( As the representative of Peter Mangurian, the owner of Scotty's. We would like to appeal the Planning Commissions decision to deny CUP 02-1. After discussing this issue with Peter we have decided to amend our request to reflect a more conservative approach. * Hours of operation, 6 a.m. to 1 a.m., less than the standard 2 a.m. closing tittle prevalent in the city * Live entertainment, non amplified in order to mitigate concern for noise * Full liquor license with small bar area only. Peter's intent is to use the bar area as waiting area for dining customers. * Take out window to have railing parallel with Strand (at property line) for queuing to occur within the existing 6 foot building setback. We would like to thank you for assistance in processing this request. If you have any questions regarding any of these issues please do not hesitate to call. tfully submitted, atrick J. Killen AIA 46 ELEVENTH STREET • HERMOSA BEACH • CALIFORNIA 90254 • TEL. 310/376-9171 • FAX. 310/376-1822 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROJECT ADDRESS 1100 'Ng Si- c2,P,ND g �r RECD ` ED FEB 1 3 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT Project Name (If applicable) Sc-cfrN'S RESTAvice.ANT LEGAL DESCRIPTION L. OT.S 1 , 2 � 3 4 t-1 2.Mv.A \iU A TRACT ZONING C ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name(s) F- ETEl2 M frit•IGURIAN Phone (31°) 3Ia ."7 tS2 Mailing Address 1 WO n+C 5T ZAN O Mo s H BOAC N CA • Applicant's Relationship to Property (,EA5 �E *I have inquired about the need to obtain a Coastal Development Permit from the Coastal Commission, and understand I do do not X require a permit. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE / DATE a 025¢ PROJECT REQUEST Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) (3812) C.U.P. - Condominium of Units (3812) �? C.U.P. - Amendment/Amortization (3805) C.U.P. - Minor Amendment (3899) _ C.U.P. - Fences & Walls (3864) jC Environmental Staff Review (3803) Extension, Tentative/Final Map/CUP etc. (3883) Final Map (3 810) General Plan Amendment/Zone Change (3811) _ Height Limit Exception (3898) Lot Line Adjustment (3884) Nonconforming Remodel (3866) Parking Plan (3857) Permitted Use Request (3885) Planning Commission Appeals (3888) Precise Development Plan (3867) Tentative Map - Subdivision/Lot Split (3809) Text Amendment, Private (3886) Vacation, Right -of -Way ( ) Var. ce (3808) V luntary Lot Merger (3887) 00' Radius Noticing - 1st Noticing (3868) 300' Radius Noticing - 2nd Noticing (3890) /,397:.°= Total Fees DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (attach additional pages if necessary) • t k -Qvc5r Tifcr foccov,^'G Afiks57 /i^+"No ^rc-via' 70 771a E'x/57jC. v:4'. d 70 MilE A eV Lh» FAL Accowoc 5ezwcc C) %v /44ve 19,71,41 PleV Live E417 -6e7», frMCN: 7b Ave' A 7# kc -ev r ,erode se/awcF 4L/.4, 4.04i 4No To "-SOsc6 ,%o4.5. aF Ofeal-7/"' 7' had,..) 2¢ ffmJ/Zs of o14 g,4r(d^' FOR,,OFFICE`U: ONL°Y=.R CEIVED` OF SUBMl7 PROPERTY OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT (Signature required from current PROPERTY OWNER, not owner in escrow.) Name S tt/ -41,U' I72Y1 CJ- Signature Address 2-ta2)/ (LL)d c v meO L f Telephone . ( 7(de `a 72) (P f:\b95\cd\applicat\apply 6 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5907 C�l11lJllllllJl�lllllllJlJll./1111111111./ll./llllJl./ll./llll�llJlllllllllll�l State of rA a-r)PF County of VC -HO alf' On wail / °47i 20D2 before me, K_ 'U)l yl) khL/a) a ti PoD,, DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC &U ,l 15 kd personally appeared ❑ personally known to me - OR NALINI KHURANA Commission # 1227975 Notary Public - California Ventura County My Comm. Expires Jul 5, 2003 NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to he the persont) whose name is/a subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that htp/she/th$ executed the same in isjit /her/tir authorized capacity( :-,), and that by r/her/tl r signature?) on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person( acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. /Jab kci) OPTIONAL SIGNATURE OF NOTARY Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: TTTLE(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY IES) eiL DESCRIPTION OF -ATTACHED DOCUMENT Ps -pe, /wp evo i-- u.1-� TfTLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT 11 t1111i11 lull ll1 lti rl ritiD NUMBER OF PAGES /// 2 ATE OF DOCUMENT 24 SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN N ED ABOVE 01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91309-711344 P.C. RESOLUTION 02-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR ON - SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL, LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AND ALTERATIONS TO AN EXISTING RESTAURANT TO INCLUDE A DANCE FLOOR FOR 1100 THE STRAND, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT Section 1. An application was filed by Peter Mangurian, seeking amendment to an existing conditional use permit to allow on -sale alcohol; live entertainment; a take-out food service window; 24-hour operation and alterations to the floor plan to include a dance floor in conjunction with an existing restaurant. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit on April 16, 2002, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The business is currently operating under the terms of a Conditional Use Permit, as amended, approved in 1989, for on -sale beer and wine in conjunction with a restaurant. 2. The property is zoned C-2, with commercially zoned property to the north and immediately to the south, and public parking lot located to the east. The predominant uses to the south are residential. 3. . In 1993, the City Council approved, on appeal, a Conditional Use Permit for live entertainment, On -sale General Alcohol, and a dance floor. This permit was not executed and has now expired. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit: 1. The site is zoned C-2, and its location south of the downtown core area within close proximity to residential uses to the south is not suitable for the proposed use with the proposed amendment for live entertainment, on -sale general alcohol and a dance floor, and extended hours. These changes will increase noise levels to where they cannot be satisfactorily mitigated given that entertainment would be located with a glass patio enclosure. Further the. change will extend the hours of the business to later hours in the evening and night when noise is a greater concern to surrounding residents. -1- 1 2 3 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2. The proposed take-out window is not suitable because of the potential conflict with pedestrian and bicycle traffic along the Strand, and is not necessary as take-out orders can easily be accommodated inside the restaurant. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby denies the requested amendments to the Conditional Use Permit. Section 6. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 any legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. VOTE: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 02-18 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of April 16, 2002. Sam Perrotti, Chairman Date p 70o2 Cupr1100denial Sol Blumen eld, Secretary 8. CUP 02-1-- Conditional Use Permit amendment to allow on -sale general alcohol; amplified live entertainment; a take-out food service window; and 24-hour operation in conjunction 'with an existing restaurant and to add bar seating inthe patio area and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration at 1100 The Strand, Scotty's. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. Director Blumenfeld provided a background of the applicant's conditional use permits and requests for this facility; explained that this applicant is requesting to amend his CUP to include adding full alcohol sales and to include live entertainment; advised that the applicant will be adding some bar 'seating, a dance floor, and a walk-up takeout window; and that. a request is being made to extend the hours of operation to 24 hours, allowing alcohol sales between the hours of 6:00 A.M. and 2:00 A.M. He stated that this building is located within the Downtown district; that the use is allowed within the zone; and that the use • is similar with the other uses/businesses in the area, but that due to its location to the Pier Plaza area, there is a great potential for noise to some of the surrounding residents. He highlighted the letters which had been received from the residents living near this facility in which they address their opposition to the increase in noise; and because there aren't substantial modifications being proposed for this business, he added that the issue of noise is difficult to mitigate in this existing business — stating that the windows are not double paned and that there is no air conditioning unit being proposed. He stated that the applicant has indicated that the takeout window is likely to be located in the northwest corner of the business, directly adjacent to the Strand; and that staff believes this location would create an unsafe condition for pedestrian traffic on the Strarid. Commissioner Tucker commented on his concerns with the limited parking; questioned why a parking attendant is not being proposed; and noted his opposition to employees using the limited parking at their places of business. Director Blumenfeld noted for Vice -Chairman Pizer that the applicant is short 29 parking spaces based on current parking standards. He clarified that since there is no proposed change in use related to parking there is no change in the off street parking requirement. Director Blumenfeld noted for Chairman Perrotti that the current hours of operation are from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing in regard to this matter. Patrick Kellin, 46 11th Street, Hermosa Beach, representing the applicant, noted that the applicant is not proposing to do a lot of modifications to the building; advised that the restaurant has been operating for years with the 22 parking spaces which exist — noting that this is one of the few establishments with its own parking lot in that area; stated that a parking lot attendant is always on staff; and advised that the applicant does try to accommodate the majority of his guests in that parking lot. Mr. Kellin stated that this evening's proposal is to have the general sale of alcohol, to extend the hours of operation, to allow a piano bar, to construct a takeout window — noting that theapplicant is flexible in the placement of the takeout window. 6 P.C. Minutes 4-16-02 /o Mr. Kellin stated for Commissioner Hoffman that the sliding doors are off the ground; that as one enters in off the alley side or parking lot side, that the grade is higher than the Strand, ending up with a curbed condition; and that at this point in time, the applicant is not proposing any modification to that condition. In response to Vice -Chairman Pizer's inquiries, Mr. Kellin stated that at this time, the applicant is not considering changing the way he runs his business; and noted that the cars are stacked in the parking lot by the attendant as efficiently as possible. Mr. Kellin advised that beer and wine are currently being served at this location; that it is the applicant's intention to continue to serve food; and noted that he is located in a commercial zone. Steve Hunt, 910 Strand, advised • that he is representing various residents living nearby; noted their objection to adding additional alcohol businesses in this area, which will result in more noise and loitering; highlighted the significant changes to the Downtown area in the past years; and urged the Planning Commission to protect the residents' quality of life by denying this request. Mr. Hunt suggested that the City consider a more balanced land use and upscale use at this location. Mr. Kellin stated that he can appreciate the concerns of the residents because his office and home is located in the area and noted his interest in preserving the character of the community; and reiterated that this business has successfully operated at this site with its current parking availability. There being no further input, Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. Commissioner Hoffman expressed . his belief that this is a change in business use and that he can't support this request. Vice -Chairman Pizer concurred with Commissioner Hoffman's belief that this request is a proposed change in use; noted his opposition to the expansion of existing alcohol licenses in this city; and expressed his belief that this will help create an expansion of Pier Plaza noise and crowd activities to the south Strand area. Commissioner Tucker addressed the need to preserve the quality of life for the residents in this community; and cited his concerns with parking and noise. Commissioner Kersenboom noted his belief that this proposal is a change in use and commented on the increasing parking needs in the area. Chairman Perrotti noted his concern that the CUP will run with the land and highlighted the fact that it is not known who the future occupants of this property will be; expressed his belief that the applicant hasn't been proactive enough in mitigating the noise problems at this business; and stated that while he would support extending the hours of operation to midnight and the takeout window on the southern or eastern side of the building, he could not support the other requests. P.C. Minutes 4-16-02 1/ MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to DENY the applicant's request.. The following roll call vote reflected unanimous approval of the denial: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, .Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None AB SENT: None airman Perrotti recessed the meeting at 8:55 P.M. and reconvened the meeting at 9:06 P.M 9. CUP 02-4 -- Conditional Use Permit minor amendment to change hours of o an existing market with off -sale beer and wine from 7:00 A.M. to 10 8:01 .M. to 12 midnight Sunday through Thursday, and to 2:00. A. Satur s , at 205 Pier Avenue, Alta -Dena Drive -In Dairy. Staff Recommende ction: To approve said request. o . eration : s 1 P.M. to Friday and Director Blumenfeld exp . fined that the applicant is proposing to ext ' d his hours of operation for the existing drive-throu:h dairy from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P. ► . daily to 8:00 A.M. to 12 midnight Sunday through Thu say and until 2:00 A.M. on Frida, and Saturday; stated that some of the surrounding businesses in s e area are permitted to sta, open past 11:00 P.M. during the week; advised that both letters in susort and in oppositio o the applicant's request have been provided to the Planning Commissio , and noted that aff does not foresee the extension of hours as a problem. Director Blumenfel s stated that ere are issues withhow the site will be managed and that conditions should be inclu • -°d to e - al with loitering, littering and noise control; and suggested that if this request is approved, I .t there be a 6 -month review period following approval to determine if the applicant is in co r p : nce with the CUP. He added that there is no additional gross floor area being added to e busin: s; and advised that no formal complaints have been made regarding noise or loit: ing at this b ► Mess nor has Code Enforcement staff found a problem during a recently sch-•uled weekend eve ng inspection. Chairman Perrotti opened the pus c hearing in regard to this ma, er. Won Sam, 205 Pier Avenue done during the daytime he be given the same o reflects the great pri owner/operator of the dairy, stated that urs and that the rest is done during the even ortunity as those stores across the street; and poin he takes in his business. ne-third of his business is g hours; requested that d out that his facility Mike Anders, 13 Sunset Drive, noted that he would support the applicant's .roposal; but addressed hi concerns with people coming through his street late at night loitering a • littering; and quest' .ned if this sale of alcohol will create more of a nuisance to the neighborhood. Rob Kurstey, 3435 Wilshire Boulevard, attorney representing Nancy Yu, who manages A -'s L' or which has operated at 240 Pier Avenue for the past 20 years, expressed his client's belie at allowing an expansion of alcohol sales in this area will create a problem. P.C. Minutes 4-16-02 /Z IZ (orI ��rr I cur I 14 car A 21 ' � 22 •23 •‘24 25' 28 27 CODE - 4340 10'1 FDR ►REV. ASSMT. SEE: 4M7.4. _. Wilx1711 . b do 0 11 o s r o 19' 9 10 tt 12 13. ' 14 19 16 17 18 Q UV /8. C 8 e to @,0, ,,,,/.. 30 fr 1 : K. I I 10 ea 30 eP.6 JO 215 30 - 30 et a13, 40 40 24 40 -, ass V09JO 213 Wilx1711 .. Jo j' a/ 90 es z 'dr - — 19' 20 21ZZ '` 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 r/n•' O /8. t Q 24.4 30 10 ea 30 eP.6 JO 4187-904 St 0 v HERMOSA BEACH M. 1-25-26 L /3 /00 V. Stephen Hui 910 Strand Phone: 310- 042 Hermosa Beach Fax: 310-37:. CA 90254-4134 E-mail: Shunt@aol.com April 16, 2002 City of Hermosa beach Planning Commission and City Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RECE VI D APR 1 6 2002 COM, DEV. DEPT. Regarding request for denial for Scotty's CUP for general alcohol and entertainment Since January of 1999 a cumulative number of over one hundred residents of Hermosa Beach have attended various meetings, spoken at such meetings , and written letters tothe city and the press opposing any additional alcohol or entertainment at Scotty's restaurant. Many of us live only a few buildings from Scotty's and we continue to strongly oppose any additional alcohol or noise from Scotty's. We request that the Planning Commission please review the communications and reports already on file in this matter the last two times it was denied. We continue to have a serious problem with public drunkeness on the Strand south of the Pier Plaza and any additional alcohol on the Strand would have a negative impact and further disrupt the residential neighborhood resulting in more noise, liter, congestion, and unruly public drunkeness. In 1993 the Planning Commission staff opposed a Scotty's application for on -sale liquor and live entertainment. To quote, the staff believed that "the proposal is too intensive and will create negative impacts." Specifically mentioned were " police problems, increase in noise levels, and congestion." The only thing that changed since the staff recommended denial -in 1993 has been a tremendous increase and oversaturation of alcohol related establishments in our immediate neighborhood bringing with it the ensuing problems of noise and congestion. In 1999 the City Council and Planning. Commission denied Scotty's application based on at least three quoted factual findings: 1. "The downtown environment has changed significantly since the original request for on -sale general alcohol and a dance floor, particularly in terms of alcohol establishments and entertainment. 2. The proposed use is not compatable with nearby residential uses since it could produce a tremendous amount of sound, and if successful could generate an overflow of patrons causing congestion and general nuisances to residents. 3. The imposition of conditions would not mitigate all of the negative impacts generated on nearby residents or comercial properties." During the last year the Economic Development Committee has given much study into the planning process of balancing economic development with the rights of the existing residents. The first four key elements of the plan call for: 1. " Hermosa is a community first SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Page 2 and a visitior destination second. 2. Maintain - the beachfront business district...and adjoining residential areas. 3. Preserve Hermosa's character. and 4. Celebrate and protect our greatest asset: the beach, our community and our quality of life." We ask you to please consider the residents quality of life. We respectfully request that the Planning Commission uphold the last two denials. The decisions to deny by past Planning Commissions and City Coucils were based on thoughtful consideration of the facts. Please consider the many residents of our city who have been negatively impacted and will be more so if this CUP is not rejected. We continue to suggest that a balance in land use would benefit our city and that a more upscale development at this location would help preserve Hermosa's family character and be of more benefit to the residents of our city. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Residents For A Better Hermosa Attachment: Sample of residents opposition letters from the last denial l.� KENT BUFtroN BRAD.N. RAKER AL.BNO 1-.. LUNDY, 111 City of Hermosa Beach Planning. Department and City Council 315 Valley .Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90354 BAKER BUR1ON. CINDY February 12,1999 ATTORNEYS AT LAW A PRORR$IIONAL CORPORATION IS PIER AVENUE HaRMOSA AR'ACH CA aoa1:14.3888 TELGPHONg1 31 Q • 37454ess FACSIMILE: 310 • 376.7483 Q•MAIL„ RBL$URVLAWIAOL.COM Re: Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, I-ebruaty 16, 1999 . Opposition to Scotty's Application for Alcohol and Entertainment Permit To Whom It May Concern: I am a partner here at Baker, Burton & Lundy. My family has owned property in Hermosa Beach since the 1920's and I have lived at 934 Strand which has been our family beach house since it was built in 1939. I am an owner of this residence. My family and I are adamantly opposed to the ,- expanding number of alcohol related facilities in Hermosa Beach, and specifically on the Strand and on the promenade. / c -\?C Hermosa Beach has always had an extremely unique character and, in our hearts and minds, ha been the quintessential beach town, Our family has never opposed any application for building and/or use permits. We have appreciated and enjoyed the economic development that has typified Hermosa Beach for the past five years. Unfortunately, it gravely concerns us that Hermosa Beach has become known throughout the South Bay, and even Los Angeles area, as a bar town, • attracting individuals who frequently disturb the peace with their public drunkenness, and loud and unruly behavior on the Strand. . . . , The impact on our residence has been significant. There isn't a day that goes by that we aren't policing our front yard (adjacent to the Strand) of empty and half empty alcohol cans and bottl Our house has been subjected to vandalism, burglary, and frequent trespassers. People use our backyard and side yard for illicit conduct, including drugs, public consumption of alcohol and other criminal activities. We have made a mistake by not calling the police on every occasion. We had deemed it to be problems that we could take care of, but unfortunately didn't realize that .. making a police record would have an effect on your decision. t 3pdd 68L91-50 NOrtrr13 CNV 1:7xva cc: 1t fntnwt !R . C,t -q•.•7 /4 City of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission February 12, 1999 Page 2 p Liti.t.A)) Of particular concern is the already severely impacted parking problem. Our house is the very first single family residence south of Scotty's. We are constantly having individuals illegally park in our lot and it has recently gotten much worse. Our parking lot is not fenced in, and our garage is like a carport. Despite prominently posted no parking signs, people blithely park in our lot, sometimes taking two, and even three, spaces. For us to be able to use our own property, we are forced to ticket and tow these individuals. Recently one night we had a very serious altercation with one individual whose car we had towed, There was a strong fear for not only the safety of ourselves, but that of our property. Someone had parked his vehicle in our lot. We did everything we could to locate this individual prior to having it towed. After a considerable amount of time, we called and had theindividual's car ticketed. The individual carne back, took the ticket off his car, put it inside his car, locked his vehicle, put his "club" on the steering wheel, put his top ups and left his vehicle in our lot. Imagine this happening to you, some stranger pulling into your driveway, parldng his car in your driveway, blocking your access to your house, and leaving his car there despite not so subtle hints that he was trespassing with his vehicle. At approximately 2;00 a.m. when the bars closed this drunken individual came looking for his vehicle and started screaming obscenities arzd making physical threats to myself and the guests I had at my home. He specifically indicated that he would be seeking revenge upon both the owner and the physical property. Needless to say, it was obvious this individual was frequenting one of the many liquor establishments downtown and was very drunk. 5p; c, 5c� Our house is located at the very edge of where the spot lights which illuminate the beach and the Strand end. Therefore, drunks walking down the Strand stop in front of our house as it is the first ' /eet dark area to loiter and continue their drunken revelry. This more often than not happens around 2:00 a.m. when the bars close. These individuals usually are providing their own alcohol at this point. It is quite a dilemma as to what to do in these situaEons. Sometimes I have had to get up out of bed and simply ask the individuals to move along, and am usually respon• • to with derision and profane insults. Other times I have called the police so the • ers can i force the peace. On one particular occasion, all five cars in our parking lot wer vandalized : bsequent to the police intervention. You can imagine what a Gordian Knot we e. Mo imes we simply choose to ignore the noise and try and resume our sleep once the beer fins, y runs out. If Scotty's application is granted, we fear we will be forced to endure this same kind of activity from early evening all the way through closing. I understand that the planning commission staff recommended denial of Scotty's application for "on -sale" liquor and live entertainment six years ago, specifically indicating that the proposal was too intensive and created negative impacts. My family and I emphatically request the denial at this time. The only thing that has changed since the staff recommended denial of this type of use has been an increased adverse effect on the welfare of residents, the noise emanating from the property and drunken patrons leaving theproperty 93/.9/.SP.t4 _ vor.;rng err:v 1.77NV 9E:Ot (trout) 66. S 'fi3.3 City of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission February 12, 1999 Page3 creating a nuisance to the surrounding residential neighborhood as well as increased alcohol and public drunkenness on the Strand south of the Pier. These are specific violations of the general conditions of past approvals of conditional use permits for Scotty's and other establishments along the Pier, Although I am unable to appear at this meeting Tuesday, please rest assured that if I was available to appear I would voice my opinions probably more adamantly than I have put forth in this letter. When speaking to my friends, neighbors and clients here in Hermosa Beach, they have all unanimously been opposed to the increase in liquor and night club establishments. Hermosa Beach needs a varied economic base. We lamented the loss of Either/Or book store and urge the planning commission to bring in commercial enterprises of this and other retail nature, About the only individual I have heard voice approval of this application is the owner of Scotty's himself,, My family has eaten at Scotty's on numerous occasions and appreciate the restaurant in its current form. As it is, it contributes to the uniqueness of Hermosa Beach and -is a wonderful place to patronize. Its transformation into a bar and night club would be a violation of stated staff concerns and create further "nightmares" for our family. I will be available to answer any questions you might have. Please do not hesitate to contact me. ALLjm 5.31,9L6"0 Yours v BRO Y, III and F NO.TErIE G V 113)IVE 95: 0 t (NOVO 66 . 'SI '833 January 26, 1999 City Planning Commission Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to protest the proposed addition of a nightclub and parking structure south of the Hermosa Beach pier. Both would threaten the peace and safety of the Hermosa Beach community, serving only to line the pockets of outside commercial interests who care little for the local welfare. The proposed night club would replace Scotty's restaurant, currently an unintrusive eating establishment on the strand. While the bars and clubs on Pier Avenue have enjoyed success and brought prosperity to the city, their accompanying negative externalities are easily contained in a confined area. The strand location of the new night club is outside of this confined area, crossing the line between the commercial district and the neighborhoods, which are and always should be residential. While Scotty's was a commercial establishment, its diurnal hours and family atmosphere made it a pleasant addition to the neighborhood. A night club would bring unwanted noise and crime to the currently peaceful neighborhoods south of the pier. The proposed parking structure would mar the face of Hermosa Beach, blocking its Pacific views and destroying the picturesque landscape that define the city's identity. People who choose to reside in Hermosa Beach do so because they want to live in a community that is friendly and aesthetically pleasing rather than the urban jungle found to the east and north. With the addition of the parking structure, Hermosa Beach would begin to blend in with the urban sprawl that is becoming Southern California. In conclusion, I ask that you seriously consider the negative impact that the addition of the proposed night club and parking structure would have on the City of Hermosa Beach, both for current and future generations. Sincerely, Mary Elisabeth Cattani Resident 920 The Strand Hermosa Beach, CA RECEIVED FEB 1 1 1999 UOM. DLV. DEPT. April 12, 1999 Planning Commission City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach; CA 90254 RE: Scotty's 1100 the Strand Dear Planning Commission, RECEIVED • AP! 131.999 UOM. DEV. utjf This letter is in response to Scotty's request to add a dance floor and on -sale alcohol to their restaurant. I represent the owners of the building located at 1042 the Strand, which is directly across 11th street from Scotty's and also the Sea Sprite Motel located at 1016 the Strand We are very opposed to either on -sale alcohol or a dancefloor. If you look at our building at 1042 the strand, you will see that half the rooms face 11th street and Scotty's Restaurant with large windows, sliding glass doors or both. Several years ago, we were getting many complaints from our guests /tenants about all the noise that was coming from the eating/drinking establishments on Pier Avenue. The noise complaints centered on nighttime, when guests could not go to sleep because of all the noise. The City finally got the establishments to keep all of their back doors closed at night, established noise restrictions which they enforced, and received some cooperation from the establishments. All of these items helped to reduce the number of complaints that we were receiving; however, we still receive some complaints occasionally. I personally live on 10th street, and sometimes can hear the noise emitting from Pier Avenue at night Scotty's is not located on Pier Avenue. It adjoins all of the residential units located on 11t street, 11th court and 10th street. If you allow them to have on-site alcohol or a dance floor at their location, which is right next to all of the residential units on 11th street, 11th court and le street, you will be IMPACTING THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ALL THE RESIDENTS LOCATED IN THAT AREA. IT WILL ALSO IMPACT THE ABILITY TO RENT MOTEL UNITS AT THE SEA SPRITE MOTEL WHICH IS LOCATED AT 1016 THE STRAND. In the past, the motel had guests that would leave during the night and request a full refund because of the noise on Pier Avenue prevented them from going to sleep. I am not talking about the normal noise that is on the strand and beach at night, but the loud noise that comes from the eating / drinking establishments, especially around closing time. .2o • • Please note that a large part of the exterior building of Scottvs' Restaurant is GLASS. It will be almost impossible to stop the noise that will be emitting from the restaurant. Please do not allow the on-site sale of alcohol or a dance floor to be located so close to Residential units in Hermosa Beach. Respectfully„ Darrell Lee Greenwald 1016 the Strand Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310-345-5779 LH WPC . M ILt V - r• i Fax Transmission Date:4-11-99 To:Planning Commission !Fax Number:372-6186 From:Lawrence 0. Fordiani Our Phone:310-372-1262 :Our Fax: 310-379-1042 No. of pages including cover page:1 Il' ,I :!,•IIr11:11I� !Iif i:I.11 r !II: IR .,;•4,!:•‘ !Itll: •111.' ':'111 r Message: Re: 1100 Strand, Scottys Dear Commission Members: I own a single family residents at 710 Hermosa Ave., which is one block from the Downtown Bar & Entertainment area. I've been a Hermosa Beach homeowner for 18 years. I'm AGAINST the request for on -sale alcohol and live entertainment at Scotty's. The request would only intensify the NEGATIVE IMPACT the bars have on the surrounding residential neighborhoods. My tenants at the property and neighbors have mentioned about the noise and problems that occur when the bars are closing. I don't think the downtown area needs anymore bars. In conclusion I ask that you reject the applicants request. Yours very truly, Lawrence 0. Fordiani Ilermosa Beach Homeowner RECEIVED APR 1 7 1999 Please call if you experience any transmission problems. 22 January 1999' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPT./CITY COUNCIL 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Sirs: LOM. DtV. DEPT. It is my understanding that SCOTTY'S (on the Strand) has requested permission to have both alcohol and entertainment licenses in anticipation of changing their primary focus of business. My family and I are very concerned about the direction that the city seems to be taking vis-a-vis the increasing number of "party" type businesses. I am the majority owner of a family owned property at 934 Strand and have lived in the house off and on since it was built in 1939. There was a period about 15 years ago when we were having problems with drunks on the strand at all hours of the night, people urinating in the garage and side areas of the house, and on several occasions, breakins and robbery. Since that time, the city has done a marvelous job of making Hermosa Beach a fun and exciting and SAFE area to live in as well as to visit. It would appear that as Hermosa Beach becomes more and more the "place to go" at nights that eventually we will start drawing in some of the undesirable elements that used to plague both Manhattan and Redondo beach cities. I think that we are at about a saturation point insofar as being able to provide services for the increasing numbers of people that live and visit the city. -To further increase the number of businesses selling alcoholic beverages and entertainment will only cause problems similar to those we had in the past. Please consider this letter in your deliberations re the Scotty request. Sincerely, MICHAEL'W. RANDALL 45 Seaview Dr., South Rolling Hills Estates, California (310) 377-6080 23 National Lines Bureau, Inc. February 17, 1999 City of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE:CUP 98-9 To Whom It May Concern: I appeared before your commission last evening and made a verbal presentation and`I want to follow-up with a written statement. Many years ago my Grandfather, Dr William R Molony, purchased the property at 934 Strand and built a family beachhouse. Over the years all Molony relatives have spent wholesome and happy summers at the house. Upon my Grandfather's death some years ago, the ownership of the house was divided amongst his grandchildren. For more than fifty years I have personally enjoyed the use of the house and the tranquility of the beach and the waves. In recent years Hermosa Beach has changed the face of Pier Avenue and in doing so has attracted a large, young, energetic customer base. With the crowds has come an increase in the revenue collected by the City. But for those of us who live within two blocks of Pier Avenue the increase in business has meant an increase in rowdiness, vandalism, trespass, illegal parking, bottle and trash disposal on our property, etc. Now we are informed that Scotty's has requested a CUP amendment which would allow them to have a dance floor and live entertainment. They say that they would mitigate the on-site noise through various means, but its the noise that their departing inebriated customers make as they stroll down the Strand at closing time that concerns me. I used to enjoy sleeping in our bedroom which faces the Strand, however since the changes to Pier Avenue, I have had to move to a bedroom which faces the alley in order to minimize the jubilant sounds of drunks on their way home. If Scotty's intended to participate in the revitalization of Pier Avenue, they should have participated in the remodel, instead of being a johnny-come-lately. I recommend that the CUT be disapproved, unless we can be guaranteed that our peace will not be disturbed by its departing revelers. Siicerely, Richard Molon 'General Mana 222 West Sixth Street, Suite 725 • Post Office Box 148 • San Pedro, California 90733-0148 • (310) 832-8387 • FAX (310) 8324058 24 Hour Service i•• 40 • Thursday, March 11, 1999 City of Hermosa Beach Planning Department and City Council 315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90354 Re: CUP 98-9 Scotty's, 1100 The Strand To Whom it may concern: We live in a neighborhood in the 900 block of the Strand. This neighborhood does have more foot traffic than most, nonetheless, it's our home. There are families with children who play and sleep here. The overall ambience of our homes is being threatened at this time by:Ithe influx of patrons to the many drinking and dancing establishments in Hermosa Beach. For those of you who do not participate in the nightime scene downtown, I would invite you to stroll through the Plaza area on a Friday or Saturday night. In addition to the crowded bars you will see incredibly long lines of people out the doors of many establishments, especially those with live music and dancing. Many of the patrons waiting in line may never see the inside of the bar before last call, but will spend the entire evening socializing outside. This is the scene. It really matters not at all whether one ever gets inside because the party is outside. This is the major objection to allowing Scotty's to have a permit allowing alcohol, dancing and live entertainment. This would be bringing the Plaza scene right to our doorsteps and under our bedroom windows. The new scene will be on the Strand, outside and all night. Before the increase in the number of bars and bars with live entertainment in the downtown area, the crowds leaving after midnight and walking the Strand was acceptable with the exception of Fourth of July weekend and New Year's Eve. Now, everynight is the Fourth and New Year's Eve, beginning around midnight. Please deny the request for a permit and allow us to maintain our neighborhood. Very truly yours, Strand • • I•krinosa [4*h, (T.\ 90254-4[34 310-379-78-r 3 ICJ -379-I)034 Fax 2S LAWRENCE O. FORDIANI 3103791.042 • • LAWRENCE O. FORDIANI Date:April 8, 2002 To:Planning Commission Fax Number:372-6186 From: Lawrence O. Fordiani Our Phone: 310-372-1262 Our Fax: 310-379-1042 # of pages including cover page: 1 RECEIVED APR 0 8 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT. P.01 Re: 1100 Strand, Scottys Dear Commission Members: I own two residential properties (Palm Dr. & Hermosa Ave,) that are located one block from theg Downtown Bar & Entertainment area. I've been a Hermosa Beach Homeowner for the past 21 years. Concerning the current requests that Scotty's is bring before your commission; weren't these same request denied in early part of 1999? Same as in 1999 the request would only intensify the NEGATIVE IMPACT the bars have on the surrounding residential neighborhoods. I think it's common knowledge the problems in the area specially at closing hour. Again I ask that you reject the applicants request. Yours very truly Lawrence O. Fordiani Hermosa Beach Homeowner August 7, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council 6A3 - Regular Meeting of August 13, 2002 i SURFERS WALK OF FAME - PROPOSAL FROM ROGER BACON TO INSTALL PLAQUES ON THE PIER TO RECOGNIZE THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE EARLY SURFERS TO THE HISTORY OF HERMOSA BEACH Recommendation: That the City Council review and consider the proposal, including the process for selection of the individuals to be honored and the placement of the plaques in the deck of the pier. Background: As you are aware, Roger Bacon and others have raised over $20,000 to develop a Surfer's Walk of Fame in Hermosa Beach. The location of the walk is now proposed to be on the Pier beginning just west of the gate. The plaques would be placed near the edge of the deck at. each vertical post of the railing. They would be flush with the deck surface and made from bronze. The deck will have to be ground down in order to achieve a flush installation: A photo is attached to this report that shows where they will be placed. Roger Bacon will have the sample of how the plaques will look and the names of the people that will be honored. This location for the Walk of Fame would seem to be appropriate as it is just a short distance from the surf line. Roger Bacon and others have handled the process of selecting those to be honored and he can go into more detail at the meeting. The location also provides a chance to add others in the future using the same selection process or a modified process should the City Council be interested in it. If the location is acceptable, staff should be directed to work with the company making the plaques and develop a system for preparing the deck for the installation. The cost for this effort will be paid for from the funds raised for this purpose and will cover the cost of grinding the deck and installing the plaques. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager SURFERS WALK OF FAME HAP JACOBS CHARTER MEMBER SURFERS WALK OF FAME PIONEER DESIGNER OF LONGBOARDS AND SHORTBOARDS, ACCOMPLISHED SURFER, AND HERMOSA BEACH - BASED ENTREPRENEUR SINCE 1950. LIFETIME RESIDENT OF THE SOUTH BAY. INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 SURFERS WALK OF FAME DALE VELZY CHARTER MEMBER SURFERS WALK OF FAME INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 SURFERS WALK OF FAME DEWEY WEBER CHARTER MEMBER SURFERS WALK OF FAME INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 . • • Ln a mM N N N m 111, : 3103748997 SURFERS WALK OF FAME GREG NOLL CHARTER MEMBER SURFERS WALK OF FAME INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 SURFERS WALK OF FAME BTG COPELAND CHARTER MEMBER SURFERS WALK OF FAME INDUC I Ell NOVEMBER 2, 2002 0 • Rug. 07 2002 : 3103748997 SURFERS WALK OF FAME MIKE PURPOS CHARTER MEMBER SURFERS WALK OF FAME INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 v PHONE N0. : 3103748997 SURFERS WALK OF FAME HERMOSA BEACH WAS THE ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA LEADER OF SURFING,WITH SURFERS WHO LOVED THE SPORT AND CREATED THE EXCITEMENT OF RIDING WAVES, FOR FUN AND COMPETITION, WITH THEIR IMPROVED TECHNIQUES AND RADICAL CHANGES IN BOARD DESIGN. WE HONOR THESE 6 CHARTER MEMBERS AND 12 PIONEERS OF SURFING. INDUC'I'BD NOVEMBER 2, 2002 M a E M 401, 1 SURFERS WALK OF FAME PIONEER MEMBERS HOP MARTS DOC BALL Jim BAILEY BILL EDGARS ED EDGARS LEROY GRAMS JOHN KERWINS FRED KERWINS JIM KERWINS TED KERWINS PAUL MATHIS WARD BAKER INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 SURFERS WALK OF FAME HERMOSA BEACH WAS THE ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA LEADER OF SURFING,WITH SURFERS WHO LOVED THE SPORT AND CREATED THE EXCITEMENT OF RIDING WAVES, FOR FUN AND COMPETITION, WITH THEIR IMPROVED TECHNIQUES AND RADICAL CHANGES IN BOARD DESIGN. WE HONOR THESE 6 CHARTER MEMBERS AND 13 PIONEERS OF SURFING. INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 • SURFERS WALK OF FAME HAP JACOBS CHARTER MEMBER SURFERS WALK OF FAME • PIONEER DESIGNER OF LONGBOARDS AND SHORTBOARDS, ACCOMPLISHED SURFER, AND HERMOSA BEACH - BASED ENTREPRENEUR SINCE 1950. LIFETIME RESIDENT OF THE SOUTH BAY. INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 SURFERS WALK OF FAME DALE VELZY CHARTER MEMBER SURFERS WALK OF FAME SURFED ALL KINDS OF SURFBOARDS, SHAPED HIS OWN SURFBOARDS MADE IT EASY TO LEARN TO SURF ON A VELZY'S SURFBOARDS. NORTHSHORE SURFERS OF OHAU, HAWAII NAMED A SURFBREAK AFTER DAVE VELZY CALLED "VELZYLAND". s_.'E cenelz By v r.ZY INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 SURFERS WALK OF FAME DEWEY WEBER CHARTER MEMBER SURFERS WALK OF FAME "THE ORIGINAL HOT DOGGER"- CHAMPION SURFER, HALL OF FAME SURFER, IRONMAN SURFER AND SURFBOARD MANUFACTURER ORIGINALLY BASED IN HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 SURFERS WALK QF FAME GREG NOLL CHARTER MEMBER SURFERS WALK OF FAME_. FIRST BIG WAVE EVER RIDEN AT WAIMEA BAY AND OUTSIDE PIPELINE CAUGHT THE BIGGEST PADDLE IN WAVE AT MAKAHA, 1969, OHAU, HAWAII, INTRODUCED THE FIRST LONG BOARD TO AUSTRALIA, LARGEST PRODUCER OF SURFBOARDS, 175 A WEEK WITH 64 EMPLOYEES IN HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. GREG NOLL \J INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 SURFERS WALK OF FAME MIKE PURPOS CHARTER MEMBER SURFERS WALK OF FAME INDUC'1`ED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 SURFERS WALK OF FAME BING COPELAND CHARTER MEMBER SURFERS WALK OF FAME INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 • SURFERS WALK OF FAME PIONEER MEMBERS HOP S WARTS DOC BALL JIM BAILEY BILL EDGARS ED EDGARS LEROY GRANNIS JOHN KERWINS FRED KERWINS JIM KERWINS TED KERWINS PAUL MATHIS WARD BAKER AL HOLLAND INDUCTED NOVEMBER 2, 2002 :f Monday, August 05, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council )a:b_eg /170 Regular meeting of August.13, 2002 • REPORT ON THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE TAXI PROGRAM IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council: 1. Review this report on the status of the Taxi Program in Hermosa Beach. Provide direction to staff on the future course of the program. BACKGROUND The City of Hermosa Beach adopted Municipal Code Section 5.72 on March 19, 1998. This established the requirements for Auto for Hire companies and drivers operating in our City. Several companies applied to work under the new ordinance. As of this date, there have been eight (8) companies that have been permitted. Two of those companies did not renew their business license after the first year and presumably went out of business. We currently have six (6) companies authorized to provide taxicab service in the City of Hermosa Beach with a combined total of 232 taxicabs. Those companies and their total number of licensed vehicles are as follows: 1. America's Best Cab —10 2. All Yellow Taxi — 45 3. Ocean Yellow Cab —15 4. South Bay Yellow Cab — 99 5. Super Taxi —16 6. United Independent Taxi — 47 The City continues to be approached by new taxi companies wishing to conduct business in town. Those companies currently permitted to operate have continued over the past year to increase the number of licensed cabs in their individual fleets. In August of 2001 there were 188 licensed taxicabs. Now there are 232. As a point of reference, the City of Los Angeles only allows nine (9) companies. The City of Long Beach only uses one company with 125 licensed vehicles. The taxicab ordinance has brought in substantial revenues for the City of Hermosa Beach. For the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002, we took in $81,572 in taxicab licensing fees and $9,533 in business license fees from the six -(6) companies. This is a total of $91,105. Since the enactment of the ordinance, we have encountered some problems. At its conception, we did not put a limit the number of taxicab companies that could operate in 6b • • town nor did we limit the overall number of vehicles allowed in the City. Therefore, the program has grown so large that control is sometimes difficult. This is despite the fact that each company is investigated to make sure that it is in compliance with the municipal code. This includes making sure that the company has adequate insurance though we have had an instance where a company's policy had lapsed and they never told the City about it. We discovered this lapse by accident and ultimately their permit was suspended until they obtained adequate insurance. Each of the taxi drivers are fingerprinted and a criminal history check is completed on their background. Staff has received complaints about the taxicabs in town. They range from illegal parking practices to illegal driving practices. The police department has conducted random and directed enforcement activities and has issued citations as appropriate to violators. Staff recently implemented a new Random Drug Testing Program for taxi drivers. Drivers are now required to sign-up with Norton Medical Industries and enroll in the random testing program. The cost is slightly expensive at $75 but that does include any random tests the driver might be called for during the calendar year. Some companies have been reluctant to force their drivers to enroll in the program. As a result, the start of the random tests has been delayed. We anticipate starting the random tests in August. At the current time and in accordance with the municipal code, staff has capped the number of permits and licenses that will be issued in the future. The City will no longer issue any new. permits to new taxi companies wishing to operate in town. As noted there are currently 6 taxi companies. No new individual taxi licenses will be issued. Staff will maintain the number at 232. RECOMMENDATIONS There are various options for Council to consider for the future of the taxi program. The first is to maintain the status quo to .either cap the number of companies and taxis as illustrated above or to allow a further proliferation of permits and licenses to whomever is interested. Staff recommends that if this option is considered that the caps on permits and licenses that have been established remain in effect. Council may direct staff to consider measures to reduce the number of operating companies and taxis in Hermosa Beach to lower levels. The Council may also consider the establishment of a franchise, the selection of a single taxi company to service the City of Hermosa Beach. A single franchise would provide the City the opportunity to select a good, well run, reputable company. In the event of complaints, staff could more effectively deal with a single company to solve the problem instead of trying to figure out which of the 6 companies was responsible The Request for Proposal (RFP) would be designed to assure that Hermosa Beach would select only a taxi company that has a strong desire to meet the needs of the community and the desire to meet the standards required in the municipal code. The RFP would also allow the various companies to bid the highest price to provide taxi services to assure that there would not be a significant drop in annual revenues. If Council considers this option, a draft RFP would be returned for their review and consideration. Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL HERMOS Concur: , CHIEF OF POLICE S EPHEN BURRELL CITY MANAGER CH POLICE DEPARTMENT Honorable Mayor and Members of the July 30, 2002 Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council August 13, 2002 SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING SECTION 8.24.050 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE - PERMITTED HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION. Recommendation: That the City Council waive further reading and adopt the attached ordinance. Background: On July 23,2002 the City Council directed staff to prepare a draft revision to Section 8.24.050 of the Municipal Code regulating permissible hours of construction. Analysis: %vo/G)/) Pursuant to Council direction, the revised ordinance limits construction hours to 8:00 a.m. – 6 O -p.m— weekdays and Saturdays 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.. Construction on Sundays is prohibited. All construction for which a plumbing, electrical, mechanical, building or grading permit is required is regulated by the ordinance. Failure of the property owner or contractor to post and comply with prescribed hours of construction constitutes grounds for issuance of a Stop Work Order or suspension or revocation of the permit. Sol Blumenfe a, Director Community D velopment Department Concur: Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager Attachment: 1. Ordinance Consthrs2 �W& , PLEA s€) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REGARDING PERMITTED HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does ordain as follows: Section 1. Subsections A and B of Section 8.24.050 of Title 8, Chapter 8.24 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code are amended to read as follows: A. Permissible hours of construction. All construction for which a grading, plumbing, mechanical, electrical or building permit is required shall be conducted between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday (except' national holidays), and 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Saturdays. Construction activity as described above is prohibited at all other hours and on Sundays and national holidays. For purposes of this section, "construction" or "construction activity" shall include site preparation, demolition, grading, excavation, and the erection, improvement , remodeling or repair of structures as defined in the Uniform Building Code, including operation of equipment or machinery and the delivery of materials associated with those activities. B. Posting of notice. Prior to performing any construction activity as defined in subsection A of this section and as a condition to maintaining a valid permit, there shall be posted and at all times maintained at a prominent location clearly visible from the public right-of-way adjacent to the construction site a notice in substantially the following form: "Construction activity prohibited between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Monday through Friday, before 9:00 a.m. and after 5:00 p.m. Saturday and all day on Sundays and national holidays. [HBMC Sec. 8.24.0501" Failure of the property owner and/or contractor to post and maintain the above notice shall constitute grounds for issuance of a Stop Work Order or suspension or revocation of the permit, and further shall constitute an infraction, punishable as provided in this Code. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2002. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23• 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of the City, and shall make minutes of the proceedings of the City Council meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 22nd day of October, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney -2- Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council 0=b-4/ e2 - August 6, 2002 Regular Meeting of August 13, 2002 SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY SUMMARY — MARCH 2001— JULY 2002 Recommendation: That the City Council 1. Receive and file this report. 2. Direct staff to initiate a Code Enforcement Citation Program Background: Pursuant to City Council direction, in 2001 the City contracted for City Prosecutor services for building and zoning code enforcement and in 2002 a full time code enforcement staff person was hired. Previously code enforcement had been handled on a part-time basis with building inspection and planning staff or with part-time contract staff. Code enforcement is largely pursued on a complaint basis or when code violations are observed by the code enforcement officer or building inspectors. Over the past year 508 cases have been investigated. These cases include construction without a permit, construction of illegal units and violations of the sign ordinance. In addition, Conditional Use Permit violations are referred to the Planning Commission for permit consistency or pursued as code enforcement actions. Analysis: Code Enforcement Process Generally, upon receipt of a complaint, the code enforcement officer follows a three-step process for enforcing codes. Initially, the complaint is logged into a computer file and field inspections are conducted. The complaint is discussed with the complainant and the specific code violations are identified and documented with field notes and photos. A letter is drafted to the code violator, outlining the details of the violations relative to the Building Code or Municipal Code and the need to schedule an interior inspection if necessary. This letter includes the requirement to contact the City's code enforcement officer by a certain date (generally two weeks from issuance of the initial letter). If there is no response, a second letter is drafted reiterating the facts of the case and providing a date certain to correct the conditions. This letter will typically note that continued violation may result referral of the matter to the City Prosecutor. The more serious Building Code violations may require submittal of architectural plans and issuance of building permits. The third step typically, involves referral of a non- responsive party to the City Prosecutor. The case may be prosecuted or there may be further negotiation on the timing to correct the condition. In some instances code enforcement is simply handled by discussing the matter with the violator or by removing illegally posted signs or advertising on public property. Each week the complaint log is reviewed and updated to reflect case disposition. 6d Current Case Load There are currently 508 reported code enforcement cases as summarized below• Category Complaints No Violation Received Permit Resolved Pending Prosecuted SWO 147 10 88 15 30 4 Added Unit 82 39 0 21 22 0 Signs 127 4 40 78 3 2 CUP 41 4 1 17 17 2 Misc. 111 13 7 74 17 0 Totals 508 72 136 180 89 8 LEGEND SWO = Stop Work Order issued working without a permit and includes expired permits. Added Unit = Investigations of illegally added units. Signs = Permanent signs, banners, and sidewalk signs. CUP's = Investigations into complaints about businesses, except for signs. Misc. = Nuisance conditions related to yards, abandoned vehicles, noise, over height landscaping. Violations = Cases opened after investigation revealed a violation(s). No Violation = Investigation showed that no code violation existed. Rec'd Permit = Obtained permits or otherwise documented compliance. Removed/Resolved = Condition corrected or abated. Pending = Investigation/prosecution is on going. Prosecuted = Cases which actually went to court. All prosecutions have been successful. This does not include cases referred to the prosecutor for evaluation. Total cases reviewed by the prosecutor = 22. g Proposed Code Enforcement Citation Program for Infractions The majority of code enforcement cases are handled with voluntary compliance and without formal legal proceedings. When the City Prosecutor is involved, code enforcement requires costly and time consuming misdemeanor filings at the Torrance Superior Court. The City Prosecutor has suggested that the most efficient and expeditious way to handle the majority of infraction type cases is to use a citation program and to use the City Prosecutor to handle code enforcement related to the Building Code and illegal units. Under the proposed program, a citation will be issued after one or two warnings have been provided to a violator. The kinds of code enforcement that lends itself to citations are sign infractions, illegal dumping, storm water discharge, advertising and violations of discretionary permits. The code enforcement officer may collect fines (payable to the Finance Department similar to a parking citation). Infraction level charges can carry a penalty of $100 for the first violation, $200 for the second violation of the same law within one year. In addition, each day the violation continues is considered a new and separate offense fined at $100 for each day the offense continues. A costly fine can add up if the matter is not corrected quickly. The infraction citation may be appealed to court, however, there is no right to court appointed counsel for infraction level charges which may be heard by court commissioners rather than judges. Generally, a violator will choose to pay a fine for the types of offenses listed above rather than appeal the matter to the court. More serious code violations such as illegal units and violations of the Building Code will still require assistance from the City Prosecutor. Following issuance of a citation, the City Prosecutor will be notified of the citation and copied with correspondence sent to the violator. The Prosecutor's support staff will then file the original citation with the court. If the fine has been paid, no court appearance will be necessary and the matter will be closed if the condition has been corrected. If 2- the violator appeals the matter and pleads not guilty, then the Code Enforcement Officer will request that the matter be scheduled for the next available court date and the City Prosecutor will handle all future court appearances. This procedure will allow the City to obtain quicker compliance for minor violations while utilizing the City Prosecutor for the more serious cases. To date, the City has successfully prosecuted eight cases through the court system ranging from nuisance conditions on commercial property to unsafe building conditions and illegal units. Sometimes the cases are closed when the Prosecutor determines there is insufficient evidence to proceed. Sol Blumenfeld Di ector Community De -lopment Department Concur: Stephe t Burrel City Manager Attachment: 1. Code Enforcement Activity Log 3 codenfrpt COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT CODE ENFORCEMENT LOG CEO01 ST. NAME ST. ADD COMPLAINT OWNER FILE 1ST DATE OF NEXT OPEN LETTER BUSINESS DA E DATE FOLLOW UP outdoor storage - 1. Aviation 1055 , Casner grading permit #01-09 1/18/01 Courtirijunctionmonitor Ebersol Ryder truck 2. Aviation 1081 storage non -permitted use #00-10 3/26/01 Under review 3. Bonnie Brae 1249 Anderson no permits, SWO Likely Citation #00-28 5/2/01 plan in review ck 8/18 Shaw outdoor storage storage not a 4. Cypress 601 w/o CUP permitted use #00-17 1/24/01 aCourt 81`1'2 no permits Filed Substandard ddln 7/3`1 pssd 5. Bayview 1137 Lagerhausen 12/20 #01-08 Since 1996 recommendrfiling to CGS Feldman unsafe deck 4th & final Itr sent 6. Monterey 845-905 and much more 3/26/01 #01-11 Since 1998 nearly done ddln 8/15 stairs in setback 7. Monterey 1723 DeVillar owner in Fla. #01-12 5/30/01 rail height wrong - ck 9/1 4 a Filed Substandard 1/16/01 8. Bayview 518 - Bootleg Hixon 12/20 #01-45 5/16/01 ate18 Deck - no permit 6/5/01 ddln` 7/15 pssd ref to 9. 1st PI 1138 Lange/Rockwell court order #01-67 6/6/01 °CGS Major remodel poss. Adding dwelling - 6/6/01 10. PCH 333 SWO Louie Kona #01-68 6/7/01 Ittr sent 7/17 ck 8/15 CGS `says no strong 11. no bootleg -needs to 6/12/01 booi;legscase - notify; Monterey 1649 alter deck Gambetta #01-73 13 -Jun ompalintant Sol? Likely Citation 7/17/01 ;car rerioved, rail installed.: 12. Ardmore 1928 Junk in yard Martin #0197 7/17/01 Closed CUP junk cars - Likely Citation 7/18/01 13. Aviation 1086 landscape Vartanian/Kizirian #00-10 7/18/01 citations? Hazardous heater and 8/7/01 to apply for Variance by 14. 2nd St 136 zoning violations Anderson #01-109 8/7/01 8/21 15. 8/13/01 Manhattan 1109 Bootleg @ 1110 Palm Caldwell #01-111 8/13/01 ddln for plans 7/30 8/30/01 16. Pier 32 CUP Sangria #01-122 pending 8/30/01 17. Pier 52 CUP Sharkeez #01-123 pending 8/30/01 18. Pier 50 CUP Treas. Chest #01-124 pending 8/30/01 19. Pier, 30 CUP . Lighthouse #01-125 pending 8/6/02 1 ST. NAME ST. ADD COMPLAINT OWNER FILE 1$T DATE OF NEXT OPEN LETTER BUSINESS DATE DATE FOLLOW UP 8/30/01 20. Pier 21 CUP Pier Surf #01-126 pending 9/10/01 21. 30th St 406 SWO wood stairs Walker #01-141 9/10/01 courtorder, ddln 8/ 22. 9/12/01 Manhattan 2050 Rear Addition Williams/Hijazi #01-145 9/12/01 final ddln 8/22 text ammendment Yanez Option 10/10/01 approved needs CUP? 23. Cypress 511 PDP/CUP Questions change the code #01-162 10/11/01 Sol 24. _ 11/05/01 need to draft letter for all 4 Hermosa 542 Too many units Wattles #01-175 properties by 8/8 11/7/01 25. 17th St 1210 Illegal Shed side yard Vogel #01-183 11/7/01 Under review civil suit? Ret. Wall Neighbor 11/20/01 26. 2nd St 627 Squabble Janken/Cardes #01-185 11/20/01 he is filing court action? 27. Bonnie Another bootleg 12/20/01 Brae 1546/46 1/2 kitchen sevro/schermer #01-55 12/20/01 ddln of 7/31 past KB? 1/2/02 inspected 2nd sink to be removed by 28.Strand 16 bootleg upstairs Brill #02-01 .1/2 1/2/03 1/2/02 f 29. PCH 422 MC Shop CUPs #02-05 1/2/02 CUP application due 8/24 Learned Lumber Compliant of early 1/7/02 30. PCH 635 CUP's am noise #02-06 4/11/02Negotiating monitor a . 1/14/02 to submit height survey by 31. Strand 30 Grnhse on roof Roszyk/Baron #02-11 1/14/02 8/14 1/14/02 plans rejected again 32. Bayview 222 SWO enclsd patio Panetta #02-12 1/14/02 7/31ck on 8/20 1/16/02 work progressing under 33. Pier 405 SVVO interior re -do Daneshmand #02-15 ' 1/16/02 `permit, Ci OS D 1/16/02 34.Cypress 618 SWO rear addition James/Mantel #02-17 1/22/02 Cty mgr dealing ck 8/8 1/17/02 35. Loma 627 Bootleg & elec. Schwartz #02-19 1/22/02 final ddln 8/7 2/26/02 36. 28th St 402 Bootleg Giesregen #02-43 2/26/02 ddln to file with PC 8/15 2/26/02 37. 3rd St 843 Exp. Permit Leslien ' #02-50 2/26/02 progressing ck 7/22 38. 3/5/02 work progressing, ck on Manhattan 435 Exp. Permit Lauenstein #02-56 3/5/02 7/22 39. 3/5/02 Monterey 408 illegal shed & debris Bacharis #02-58 3/5/02 final ddln 8/5 3/5/02 40. 7th PI. 1206 Exp. Permit Bessler #02-59 3/5/02 to final by 9/1 3/11/02 no further complaints 41. PCH 1837 CUP Emergency Rd. Sunrise #02-65 3/11/02 Closed 8/6/02 2 ST. NAME ST. ADD COMPLAINT OWNER ISLE in LETTER DATE OF NEXT OPEN BUSINESS DA E DATE FOLLOW UP 3/11/02 permit issue d 5/21 exprs 42. 10th St 1070 Sub Stand. Prch Rails Ning #02-48 3/11/02 11121 3/13/02 43. Pier 433 SWO rear patio Marco #02-69 3/13/02 to re-sub plans by 8/22 44. The 3/20/02 Strand 808 hot tub no permit Coghlan #02-74 3/20/02 final ddln 8/21 3/26/02# 45.Cypress 636 CUP violations Bracy's Plumbing 02-80 3/26/02 extended ddln to 7/31 3/26/02 memo to ddln for similar use 46. Cypress 638 Non permited use Radl Painting #02-80 Sol 3/28 request 8/13 _ _ 3/27/02 47. 13th St 901 Exp. Permit Stark #02-81 3/27/01 ddln 8/22 3/27/02 48. 9th St 843 Exp. Permit Tonne #02-84 3/27/02 needs handrail ck 8/15 3/27/02 49. Palm 1635 Converted Garage Morrison #02-90 3/27/02 to submit plans by 8/15 3/27/02 50. Palm 834 RBR Bootleg Carlisle #02-91 3/27/02 working w/permits ck 7/22 a 4/2/02 decision by 7/24 plans by 51.14th St - 68 Bootleg Garge & deck Berger #02-94 4/3/02 8/12 4/2/02 phoned 7/31 plans due by 52. Strand 2140 RBR Bootleg Kaplan #02-96 4/3/02 9/26 4/10/02 53. Palm 920 Sub stand Lupi #02-98 4/10/02 to get permits by 8/3 4/15/02 53. 20th St 1201 Abandoned house Lee #02-101 4/15/02 demoed Closed. 54. 4/17/02 elec & plumbing nrly done Manhattan 429 w/o permits Panetta #02-107 4/17/02 - need plans by 8/15 55. _Work Exp. Permit/illegal 4/22/02 Raymond 1641 stairs Williams #02-108 4/22/02 to send schedule by 8/6 56. 4/25/02 Hermosa 1740 RBR Bootleg & deck Nono #02-109 4/25/02 working w/permit ck 8/20 4/25/02 57. 21 s_t St 570 Fire damage, debris Orr #02-111 4/25/02 to be demoed ck 8/15 Trying to install 4/25/02 58. 14th St 956 Bootleg Field #02-112 4/25/02 plans in ck w/KR Bad Chimney illegal T 4/29/02 59. 2nd St 219 fence Braue #02-113 4/29/02 workingrW/permit Closed 60. — — 5/2/02 Manhattan 1640 SWO Laund in Garage Holzman #02-115 5/6/02 to get permits by 8/15 5/2/02 61. 8th St 600 Bootleg Heidman #02-117 5/2/02 to submit plans by 8/14 62. 5/6/02 Manhattan . 1301 CUP Einsteins/LaPoint #02-119 ddln 8/15 8/6/02 3 ST. NAME ST. ADD COMPLAINT OWNER BUSINESS ' FILE OPEN DATE 1ST LETTER DATE . DATE OF NEXT FOLLOW UP 63. 7th PI 1245 SWO Landis 5/6/02 #02-120 64. 8th St 526 Bootleg Kiblass 5/9/02 #02-123 5/9/02 cleared escrow ddln 8/15 submitted plans 7/31 ck 8/21 65. PCH 2447 parking AIS Mgmnt 5/9/02 #02-125 need to inspect 66. Strand 1836 SWO Illegal Deck Crosby 5/8/02 #02-128 called 5/8 ck back by 8/21 working on changing deck ck 7/31 67. 15th St 825 Sub Standard Brashier 68. Golden 1723 RBR Bootleg Freeman/Kinel 69. 2nd St 439 SWO interior re -do Arrigo 5/16/02 #02-129 5/16/02 #02-130 5/16/02 #02-131 5/21/02 inspected 5/16 to inspect 8/8 posted 5/16 70. Porter 601 SWO remod Frietag 71. PCH Litter Pavillions 5/23/02 #02-134 5/9/02 #02-136 5/23/02 plans in, ck 8/18 photos 5/10 area cleaned again 7/31 monitor 72. 11th St 1210 Illegal Plumbing Filarsky/Land inv 6/4/02 #02-138 73. 8th St 74. Hermosa whole block rats, weeds & trash 6/4/02 #02-139 photos 5/29 photos 5/29 laundry still leaks - ck 8/1 monitor 1501 SWO interior re -do Yoo 75. Pier 705 Sharks Cove CUP & Signs McColgan 6/5/02 #02-140 6/6/02 #02-141 photos 6/5/ plans submitted ck 8/17 66/02 monitor 76. Monterey 721 SWO Roof deck Overman 6/12/02 #02-145 6/13/02 77. Loma 1127 Bootleg Garage Shriber 78. Braeholm 2907 SWO Rebuilding Deck Messenger 79. 35th St 118 80. Strand 802 81. Longellow 711 SWO Remod lzadpanah SWO Fence Bootleg Garage Reinagel Quinn 6/13/02 #02-146 6/13/02 #02-147 6/17/02 #02-150 6/13/02 ddln 8/5 6/18/02 #02-153_ 6/18/02 #02-155 82. 4th Ct 33 83. Hermosa 3131 84. Corona 1230 SWO Kit Remod SWO Bath remod Substand standing h2o Shannon Napoliello Block 6/20/02 #02-155 7/1/01 #02-156 7/2/02 #02-157 6/13/02 6/17/02 6/18/02 6/18/02 6/20/02 7/1/02 7/8/02 85. Pier 73 SWO Mezzanine Brewskis/Zislis 7/3/02 #02-158 got spa permit ck 8/24 need to drywall garage ck 8/19 final ddln 8/21 need owner address CGS got permit Closed working on plan submittal ck 7/31 8/6/02 ST. NAME ST. ADD COMPLAINT OWNER FILE 1ST DATE OF NEXT OPEN LETTER BUSINESS DATE DATE FOLLOW UP SWO wall - trench in 7/8/02 86. Loma 512 park Derosa #01-159 7/8/02 to KB tlilln 8/:12 7/9/02 87. Prospect 1601 SWO & Gar. Conyers. Garfield #02-160 7/9/02 ddln 7/31 7/9/02 88. 1st St 608 SWO Sub-Stand Sato #02-16.1 7/9/02 ddln 8/7 7/9/02 visited junk removed fromrear. _. 89. Pier 29 CUP Laperts #02-162 7/9/02 Closed 90. 7/11/02 Hermosa 2215 Colateral dmg? Vance #02-163 7/18/02 Ittr sent 7/17 monitor 7/15/02 applied for permit 7/22 ck 91. 26th St 249 SWO window Beste #02-164 7/16/02 7/31 7/16/02 in office 92. 28th St 506 SWO fence . Newman #02-165 7/16 got'permit--Closed- 7/16/02 93. 16th St 16 SWO stairs Stoten #02-166 7/16/02 plans in .ck 8/11 7/17/02 94. 14th St 919/921 Bootleg again Essertier #02-167 7/17/02 out of town till 8/18 7/23/02 95. Strand 402 Spa in OS-O Klein #02-168 7/23/02 ddln 8/6 - 96. 7/24/02 Longfellow 458 SWO stairs Hastings #02-169 7/24/02 ddln 7/31 7/24/02 97. Loma 726 SWO Balcony Porter #02-170 7/24/02 ddln 7/31 1820 7/24/02 98. Ardmore pprtree debris on roof Ginsburg #02-171 7/24/02 ddln 8/8 7/24/02 Spoke on 99. PCH 1000 SWO Gazebo Car wash Yap #02-172 7/24 plans rejected ck 8/7 8/6/02 5 A gust 5, 200 B//i/� Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council August 13, 2002 PROJECT NO. CIP 00-630 PIER RENOVATION, PHASE III RECEIVE LIFEGUARD BUILDING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING REPORT AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT FOURTH AMENDMENT Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council = 1. Receive and file the structural analysis report; 2. Approve the attached Fourth Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Purkiss•Rose — RSI for either Options 1 or2; 3. Authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to execute said amendment, upon approval as to form by the City Attorney; 4. Authorize the Director of Public. Works/City Engineer to make adjustments to the scope of work as necessary, not to exceed 10% of the amendment amount; and 5. Direct Staff to discuss the condition of the lifeguard building and related issues with Los Angeles County and return to City Council with more information. Background: During the April 9, 2002 City Council meeting, City Council approved Amendment No. 3 to the contract with Purkiss•Rose-RSI. Part of Amendment No. 3 included a seismic analysis of the lifeguard tower for performance evaluation under the 1997 Uniform Building Codes (UBC), providing a structural engineering report including , analysis methodologies used, findings, conclusions, sketches for any schematic structural retrofit per current code requirements, and a preliminary opinion of costs for implementation of the structural strengthening scheme. The structural engineering report is attached and ready for review. Analysis: Staff has reviewed the report and found that there is extensive damage to the lifeguard building. Although the report gives a retrofit estimate of $34,000, it only includes the work. related to the structural steel and welding. If all cost items such as mobilization, demolition, and interior architectural work were included, the cost for completely retrofitting the building may be approximately $650,000 as indicated in the attached letter from Purkiss•Rose. With the addition of the women's locker room and the exterior architectural "facelift" (approximately 6e $105,000 and $100,000), the cost increases to approximately $855,000. In comparison, a new lifeguard station with the women's locker room incorporated may cost approximately $600,000 to $750,000. The largest factor that may affect the cost of retrofitting the lifeguard station is the actual amount of deterioration behind the wall panels. The structural engineering report analyzed the building at the joints where the steel members connect and not the condition of each beam. If more deterioration is present than anticipated, the retrofit costs may dramatically increase or it may be determined that the building's condition is beyond saving. Another factor to consider is that the soil layers down to 50+/- foot depth have the potential for liquefaction. " (The term "liquefaction" is a phenomenon inwhich cohensionless soil, such as sand, loses strength and acquires a degree of mobility, similar to a liquid, as a result of strong ground shaking during an earthquake.) Therefore, the existing 40 -foot timber piles are unlikely to provide a significant advantage to the structure during a major earthquake according to the soil analysis performed by Converse Consultants. In addition, the condition of the timber piles beneath the building is unknown, but deterioration in this marine environment is very likely. If the existing building were completely renovated, it would be difficult to estimate the new expected life. Most likely, it would be more- cost effective to redesign the lifeguard building to current Uniform Building Code (UBC) requirements, incorporating the women's locker room, and placing the new building on concrete piles longer than 50 feet. Due to the higher cost to retrofit the lifeguard building, the potential of having more deterioration than anticipated, and the lack of protection against liquefaction, redesigning and constructing a new lifeguard building seems to be the better option. The attached report only involves the lifeguard station and the proposed women's locker 'room. The plaza area and restrooms remain unaffected by this structural engineering report. Design work for those portions of the project is still on schedule and the preliminary construction documents are expected to be submitted by August 20, 2002 for Staff review. A copy of the report was sent to Los Angeles County for their review and file. Options The options for the lifeguard building and proposed women's locker room are as follows: 1. Renovate the lifeguard building as planned including the structural retrofit as delineated in the structural engineering report. Authorize Staff to approve an amendment to the Purkiss•Rose contract to incorporate the retrofit and all appurtenant work into the construction documents. 2. " Design a new ,lifeguard building to current UBC requirements incorporating the women's locker room and include the demolition of the existing lifeguard building. Authorize Staff to approve an amendment to the Purkiss•Rose agreement to include the new design work in the construction documents. Probable construction costs for Options 1. and 2 are as follows: COST ITEMS A) LIFEGUARD BUILDING B) WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOM C) BUILDING "FACELIFT" D) BUILDING DEMOLITION E) TEMPORARY FACILITIES F) ABESTOS/LEAD ABATEMENT G) 20% CONTINGENCY TOTAL OPTION 1: RETROFIT OPTION 2: NEW BUILDING 650,000 750,000 105,000 0 100,000 0 0 50,000 200,000 200,000 50,000 50,000 221,000 - 210,000. $1,326,000 $1,260,000 For Option 2, the high end of the cost range was used for the lifeguard building. The figures for Cost Items C, D, E, and F are only rough estimates. The total construction cost for the project including either Options 1 or 2 is roughly $3.8M or $3.7M, respectively. The previous construction estimate for the project was approximately $2.5M. More accurate estimates will be obtained once Staff is given direction on which option for construction to pursue. Either option will impact the project schedule by approximately two (2) to three (3) months. Fiscal Impact The possible design fees for Options 1 and 2 are as follows: COST ITEMS OPTION 1: RETROFIT OPTION 2: NEW BUILDING DESIGN FEE 104,275 112,375 REPRODUCTION ALLOWANCE 3,000. 3,000 CONTINGENCY 10,728 11,538 TOTAL $118,003 $126,913 There are sufficient funds budgeted for this fiscal year to accommodate either option for addition design fees. Once Staff receives direction, additional funds for future construction costs will be requested from various agencies such as Los Angeles County and the Coastal Conservancy. 3 Attachment: 1. Structural Engineering Report - 2. Purkiss•Rose letter 3. Fourth Amendment — Option 1 4. Fourth Amendment — Option 2 Respectfully submitted, Tristan D. Malabanan Assistant Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copland, Finance Director Concur: Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur:. Stepheurre City Manager F:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\00-630 receive structural report 08-13-02.doc Structural Evaluation and Strengthening of the Hermosa Beach Lifeguard Tower Hermosa Beach, CA ABS Consulting Project No. 1094202 Prepared by: Date: July 29, 2002 onsulton ABSG Consulting Inc. 300 Commerce Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 USA Tel: 714-734-4242 Fax: 714-734-4272 ATTACHMENT 1 • Table of Contents Pace EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E-1 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Purpose 1-1 1.2 Scope of Work 1-2 1.3 Report Outline 1-2 1.4 Qualifications 1-3 1.5 Limitations 1-4 2. BUILDING DESCRIPTION 2-1 21 General 2-1 2'.21 .1 Vertical Load -Resisting System 2-2 , 4 2.1.2 Lateral Load -Resisting System 2-2 3. SITE CONDITIONS 3-1 3.1 General Conditions 3-1 32 Intensity of Shaking 3-1 — 3.3 Seismic Stability of Site Soiis 3-1 4. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND FINDINGS OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 5-1 4.1 General 5-1 . 4.2 Evaluation of Original Design Criteria 4-1 4.3 Evaluation of Existing Structural Elements 4-1 4.4 Findings of Structural Analysis 4-2 5. SEISMIC STRENGTHENING CONCEPTS 5-1 5.1 Strengthening Criteria 5-1 5.2 Description of Retrofit Scheme 5-2 LnArnericas'aZackUiermosa Beael PieAlife Guard Tort Report\ TowerRPt•Tac.dceiry I Table of Contents 6. PROBABLE RETROFIT COST 6-1 6.1 Background 6-1 6.2 Preliminary Cost Estimate 6-2 7. REFERENCES Appendices SEISMIC STRENGTHENING SCHEME B. ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE RETROFIT COST 7-1 L:V.medcaslRZaek'Hermosa Beach Pier`Lira Guard Tawer1Drah Report\TowerRpt•Toc.doe'iry Executive Summary A structural analysis was performed for the Hermosa Beach Lifeguard Tower located in Hermosa Beach, California. The purpose of this project was to determine specific weaknesses in the structure relating to seismic vulnerability and to develop conceptual strengthening measures to mitigate these weaknesses. The associated rough order of magnitude constructions costs for strengthening of the building was also developed. The result of the analysis indicates that the building could sustain significant damage during a large seismic event. Large story drifts combined with overstresses in column members (carrying gravity loads) combine to create a potentially unstable situation for the structure. Based on our analysis results, we recommend that the building be retrofitted with steel bracing members to reduce the column stresses that are associated with large horizontal displacements. To improve the horizontal seismic capacity of the floor diaphragms, we recommend additional fasteners to increase the shear transfer capacity of the metal decking to the steel floor beams. The opinion of probable construction cost to perform this work is approximately $26,000, which averages out to approximately $12.90 per square foot. If an allowance for "special working conditions" is taken into account; as discussed in Chapter 6, our opinion of probable construction cost increases to approximately $34,000, which averages out to approximately. $16.87 per square foot. Please note that this estimated cost reflects only the installation of the structural elements required for the seismic retrofit, specific cost exclusions are discussed in Chapter 6. CMOCUME-11j WEeau.0001LCCALS-11Temp5TewerRpt-Exec.dedoc E-1 LVITRNATIONAL • Chapter 1- Introduction The analysis and results are presented herein for the seismic evaluation, performed by the Structural Risk Division of ABS Consulting Inc. (ABS Consulting), for the three-story Lifeguard Tower in Hermosa Beach, California. The subject building is a three-story 25 ft by 29 ft steel frame structure that was constructed in the early 1970's. Purkiss Rose -RSI engaged ABS Consulting to perform evaluations of the building's lateral -load resisting system in order to gain a better understanding of how the building will behave during a major earthquake. A cost effective seismic strengthening scheme for the building's lateral -resisting systems is also presented in the report, along with the associated opinion of probable construction cost to implement the recommended retrofit elements. 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this report is to investigate the performance of the exiting building when subjected to lateral design Toads (seismic and wind) as currently presented .in the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). The tower analysis was separated into two (2) phases. The first phase of the analysis involved the creation a computer model (ETABS) of the subject building to investigate the performance of the existing structure when subjected to UBC defined gravity and lateral loads. The second phase, involved adding a reasonable retrofit scheme to the computer model, interpreting the results, and providing structural details in order to generate the estimated retrofit construction costs. • ■ L:,americasrRZaciaiennasa Beach PierU ile Guard Tv/er`Drat Rep ortlTowerRpt•Cht.dactiry 1-1 rgragArtomm Chapter 1 - Introduction 1.2 Scope of Work The scope of work for the seismic evaluation of the Lifeguard Tower consisted of the following items: 1. Review the original design drawings for the building to verify that the structure is generally constructed as indicated on the design - drawings. 2. Review the original soils report. 3. Provide a visual assessment of current building conditions based on photographs taken on previous visits to the site. 4. Perform engineering calculations to quantitatively identify specific areas of seismic deficiency relative to code criteria identified above. Assess strengths, weaknesses and deficiencies in.the:building's lateral force (earthquake) resisting system paying particular attention to critical and major members and connections. Note that the primary purpose of this work is to reduce the damage • and collapse potential in the event of a major earthquake. It is not the intent of this project to completely upgrade the building to current standards. Completely enhancing the building's structural systems to full UBC compliance may not be cost-effective or practical for an older building. 5. Conduct an internal discussion among ABS Consulting's senior technical staff to evaluate significance of any overstresses and excessive deflections, noted for the structure. 6. Develop a conceptual strengthening scheme to minimize potential damage and collapse potential. 7. Provide a summary of the recommended strengthening scheme, with an associated Opinion of Probable Construction Cost. I.Mmericas`RZack`Hemwsa Beach Bierel.Sfe Guard Tawer`Dra t ReparBTawerRpl•Chl.doCVry 1-2 NATIONAL Chapter 1 - Introduction 1.3 Report Outline Chapter 2 presents a description of the building and its gravity and lateral load -resisting systems. This includes descriptions of the geometry, overall dimensions and the make-up of the overall structural members in the building. Chapter 3 discusses:the general conditions of the underlying soils and site seismicity used for the structural analysis. Chapter 4 explains the evaluation criteria used and the findings of the structural analysis. Chapter 5 presents the findings and recommendations, including conceptual strengthening options recommended to satisfy the acceptance criteria. Appendix A includes sketches of the proposed seismic strengthening scheme. Chapter 6 presents an order of magnitude cost estimate for the proposed seismic strengthening scheme. Appendix B includes the detailed estimated • cost breakdown for the structural retrofit. 1.4 Qualifications ABS Consulting provides consulting engineering services worldwide and has U.S. regional offices in the San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, Salt Lake City, St. Louis, Denver, Houston, arid Boston metropolitan areas, and overseas offices in the U.K., Japan, Bulgaria, France and Singapore. Our professional staff has considerable experience in structural engineering, structural dynamics, and evaluation and strengthening of structures and equipment for natural hazards such as earthquakes and extreme winds. Our technical capabilities include formulation of seismic criteria, structural and equipment evaluation, design of hew: -structures, design of retrofit modifications for existing structures, peg �ormance. of geologic site studies, L:Umericas,RZaehViermosa Beach PierlUfe Guard tawer\Draf. ReporltTawerRpt-Cht.doc`iry 1-3 Chapter 1- Introduction post -earthquake damage assessment and repair services, and construction project management services for building and equipment upgrades. ABS Consulting engineers have extensive experience investigating earthquakes around the world. These field investigations have given us firsthand experience with the kinds of problems earthquakes cause, and the strengthening, anchoring, and bracing methods that have proven successful in preventing damage. The data accumulated from these field investigations allow us to provide our clients with a realistic projection of earthquake effects on different types of structures. ABS Consulting is very proud of our technological achievements. Our seismotechnonic models, soils databases, lifeline information, building vulnerability data, etc. remain state-of-the-art and we are always improving. For example, please visit our Internet homepageat (www.absconsulting.com). The website contains earthquake investigation . • reports from several earthquake events, including this years Nisqually Earthquake in Seattle, Washington. In addition, our website includes information about ABS Consulting's risk analyses capabilities outside of the earthquake area. For example, our 'typhoon risk analysis; chemical safety risk analysis and nuclear safety work are of equal quality. 1.5 Limitations Findings presented as part of this project are for the sole use by Purkiss Rose -RSI and their client, the City of Hermosa Beach to assist them in their evaluation of the subject building. The findings are not intended for use by other parties, and may not contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties or other uses. Our professional services are performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable consultants practicing in this field at this time. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice to be presented in this project. LMmericastRZack\Hermosa Beach FierkLife Guard Tax et Drat Repoh\TowecRpt•Cht.dodiry 1-4 • Chapter 2 - Building Description The information provided in this chapter provides a generalized overview of the layout and construction of the Lifeguard Tower in Hermosa Beach, California. The building was constructed in the early 1970's and consists of a three-story steel moment frame structure with a 25 ft by 29 ft footprint at the base. Its primary function is to house the personnel that provide the central services for the city's lifeguard network. The top and pier levels have floor to ceiling glass with a four (4) ft wide catwalk/awning on all four sides of the building. The beach level consists of 8 inch CMU block walls around the perimeter with man -doors on the north and east sides. 2.1 General The original architectural elevations and structural drawings for the building were available for review and were helpful in assessing the functionality of the lateral load' resisting system of the structure. The structure likely was designed in accordance with local building code requirements at the time of . . construction. However, building codes have changed significantly in recent years, reflecting advancements in structural engineering and lessons learned from previous earthquakes. Studies since the advent of the 1994 Northridge. Earthquake have led to some important discoveries regarding the behavior of steel moment frame buildings. Consequently, many relevant UBC provisions were revised in the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). In addition, as a result of poor performance during the 1994 Northridge Earthquake, allowable capacities for the traditional welded connections associated with ordinary steel moment frames (OMRF's) have come under scrutiny as not being "good performers". . The following sections provide a brief description of the vertical and lateral load -resisting systems for the Lifeguard Tower. L:1Amefioas4RZackWermasa 8eacn PIerlUre Guard TcwePnnal RepaMTawerRp4Cn2.Ccairy 2-1 • Chapter Building Description 2.1.1 Vertical Load -Resisting System. The roof and typical floor framing systems consist of 4 inches of concrete over 20 ga. metal decking supported by steel beams. The beams are subsequently supported by built-up, 6 inch x 6 inch steel columns. At the pier level, the upper level columns are supported by 3" diameter steel pipe columns imbedded in the corners of the .8" wide CMU wall system. The floor beams also bear continuously along the top of the CMU walls that define the perimeter of the building at the base. The foundation consists of a system of concrete grade beams, in turn, supported by a series of 40'+ long, 12" diameter timber piles which transfer the loads into the sandy soil. The bottom level floor consists of a 9 -inch thick concrete slab supported by the grade beam system. 2.1.2 Lateral Force -Resisting System. The lateral force -resisting system consists of the steel beam and column system utilized in the vertical load resisting system. The elements are connected.. to form what are known as "Ordinary Moment Resisting Frames" (OMRF's) with bolted web connectors and complete joint penetration (CJP) .. welds at the top and bottom beam flanges to the column interface. A common system for steel construction, this type of connection is often referred to as a "pre -Northridge" beam -to -column joint. This type of lateral force resisting system was designed with the intent that it would resist earthquake ground shaking based on the assumption that the connections are capable of extensive yielding and plastic deformation. without loss of strength. However, since the advent of the 1994 Northridge earthquake, the engineering community has learned through the observation of a considerable number of buildings that, contrary to the intended behavior, in many cases, brittle fractures initiated within the connections at a very low levels of plastic demand. Umedcas4Lackl4ermasa Beach Pienlife Guard Toweniinal Report \TawerR t•Ghtdac'iry 2-2 • Chapter 3 Site Conditions 3.1 General Conditions A site-specific soils report was available for the Hermosa Beach Pier Plaza area (Reference 2). Based on this report, the sub -grade soils consist of loose to medium dense sand and occasional silty -sand layers. Some dense sand layers were also encountered. The site is situated in a seismically active region. Although there are no known active faults projecting toward or extending across the building site, there are known active faults nearby, including the Palos Verdes, Compton Thrust, and Newport Inglewood, located within 0.6, 1.0, and 8.0 miles, respectively. The following sections summarize our assessment of the probable severity of ground shaking and other site hazards (liquefaction), in the event such earthquakes occur. 3.2 Intensity of Shaking' The intensity of ground shaking experienced at a particular location is commonly defined using the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale. This scale is composed of 12 categories of ground motion intensity, from I (not felt, .except.by a few.people) to XII (total damage). Intensity levels of VIII (8) and higher would. be expected at this site. This projected MMI for a particular site, along with soils characteristics can be equated to expected ground accelerations. The soils report suggests using a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.64g should be expected at this site due to a maximum credible earthquake of magnitude 6.8 associated with the Compton Thrust fault. 3.3 Seismic Stability of Site Soils Per the soils report, in addition to ground shaking, liquefactionis another potential hazard at the site. The term "liquefaction" describes a phenomenon in which cohesionless soil (sand) looses strength and acquires a degree of mobility as a result of strong ground shaking during an earthquake. The factors known to influence liquefaction potential include soil type and, depth, grain size, relative density, groundwater level, degree of saturation, and.both the intensity and duration of ground shaking. L:Wmericas,RZaucWermosa Beach Pienlife Guard Tower1. R,1al Reparacererftpt-Ch3.dee 3-1 • Chapter 4 Evaluation Criteria and Findings of Structural Analysis 4.1 General The strengthening investigation was based upon the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) (Reference 1), and the soils report guidelines (Reference 2).' The existing seismic systems were evaluated using these criteria. Where existing components were found to be critical and/or significantly deficient, strengthening measures were developed. Seismic retrofit schemes were evaluated and the most cost-effective solution is presented in this report. 4.2 Evaluation of Original Design Criteria Based on available information, the Tower was originally designed and constructed in the early 1970's to the governing building codes at that time. It should be noted that the relative seismic requirements have changed a number of times since the 1970's. In general, the level of the calculated building code earthquake forces (the building's base shear) has increased over the years due to lessons learned from various earthquakes. Moreover, progress in the fields of materials testing and structural analysis, in addition to, extensive field observations of existing systems have led to a better understanding of overall structural behavior. 4.3 Evaluation of Existing Structural Elements Without the aid of materials testing information, the condition of existing structural elements is an inexact science, at best. However, through visual observation of these elements, a better understanding of the building's condition can at least, be estimated. LUmericastRZack'Hermasa Beach Pieflite Guard Tower£ ra t RepoM1ITcwerRpt•Che.dceiry 4-1 C*liter 4 — Evaluation Criteria and Find of Structural Analysis • During a previous site visit to the Tower by ABS Consulting, it was noted that some of the interior structural steel (beam and column) elements had a fair amount of surface corrosion. The effect of this corrosion on the original strength of the elements can only be assumed without the support of materials testing analysis, which was not performed prior to this writing. Therefore, for analysis purposes, the effective stiffness of the structural beam and column elements was reduced to account for this observed condition. Another concern is the condition of the existing timber piles (not visually observed) beneath the concrete footings. Deterioration of these elements may . influence the building's ability to effectively transfer horizontal forces to the surrounding soil. The original plans suggested that there may not be a positive mechanical connection between the existing footing and the timber piles. 4.4 Findings of Structural Analysis The result of the structural analysis on the original structure shows that the building's existing lateral load -resisting system is inadequate to withstand the earthquake forces that would be generated during a major seismic event. The calculations expose several deficiencies in the lateral load -resisting system existing in both principal directions. In many respects these deficiencies can be attributed to older design and construction practices, which were based upon lower seismic code forces and less sophisticated • analysis methodologies. The most significant deficiencies in the subject building include excessive'flexural stresses in the columns and excessive lateral story drift when subjected to current design lateral loads (earthquake) Once structural elements are completely -exposed, corrosion of structural elements may also need to be added as a significant deficiency. The analysis also revealed that the lack of a positive mechanical connection from timber pile to footing does not negatively influence the stability of the structure in regards to overturning (uplift). However, other concerns Ur:.rrericas\RZach\Hermosa Beach Piedllfe Guard Towed.Graf..Report\TewerRpt-Chddec'ry 4-2 ChaC.4 Evaluation Criteria and Findings of Structural Analysis regarding the foundation -to -soil interface are highly dependant upon the present integrity of the materials used in the foundation system. L:Wmericas\FiZack\Hermosa Beach Piertile Guard TowerTraft RepoMTowerRpt-Ch4.docliry 4-3 Chapter 5 - Seismic Strengthening Concepts This chapter presents the findings and recommendations, including the conceptual strengthening scheme developed to satisfy the seismic retrofit criteria discussed in the previous chapters in this report. Sketches of the proposed seismic strengthening schemes are presented in Appendix A Since the purpose of this arialysis was to provide a cost -benefit analysis, the seismic . structural analyses were performed to specifically identify problem areas relating to seismic vulnerability. Therefore, the conceptual strengthening scheme was developed just in enough detail to identify the risks, provide information concerning strengthening details to achieve the intended seismic risk reduction and develop a rough order of magnitude retrofit cost estimate (presented in Chapter 6). The details provided in this chapter can subsequently be used to finalize the appropriate level •of strengthening (Implementation) based on both cost and overall risk reduction objectives. 5.1 Strengthening Criteria The purpose of the proposed strengthening measures is to minimize the life -safety hazards for the building in the event of a major earthquake. To achieve this objective, it is proposed that new lateral force -resisting elements be installed to supplement the existing elements. The location, quantity and size of the new elements are selected to meet the requirements of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. Strengthening of existing overstressed elements in the gravity load resisting system was not considered, except where the gravity loads combined with the earthquake loads caused major overstresses in the elements. In order to develop appropriate strengthening concepts for the building, the following items were considered and prioritized: • Strengthening of the lateral force -resisting system should be consistent with the selected seismic performance level. • Strengthening of the lateral force -resisting system should be cost-effective and where possible, the operations should be considered. riSfa r \ Americas\R2ack\4ermucr Beach Pier \Lire Guard Tuwt•AFina( Fcprt\TuwcrFPc{lv.duAir -1. Chapter 5sniic Strengthening Concepts 5.2 Retrofit Scheme The proposed strengthening concept is briefly discussed below and consists of the following major items: • Add lateral bracing (4x4x3/8" steel tubes) and associated elements to the existing steel framing system on all four (4) building elevations at upper two (2) stories. • Add shear transfer anchors to existing floor diaphragms at upper and pier levels. • Add shear transfer plates to pier level beam -to -wall connection._ Amuicac\FZack\Hi:rnios.t Beach Pier \Lire Guard Tower \Pirul to•port\ToeucFpt•Chi.dcw\ire 5-2 • Chapter 6 - Probable Retrofit Cost This chapter presents a rough order of magnitude probable cost for retrofit, which is based on the proposed building retrofit presented in Chapter 5. The rough order of magnitude cost tries to anticipate the construction cost for the work when performed by local contractors. 6.1 Background Based upon the proposed schemes, a preliminary opinion of probable costs for the installation of the retrofit measures for the strengthening was developed. Estimated costs were developed by Ascend Management Services, Inc. A summary of cost information is presented in Table 6-1 and in more detail in Appendix, B. • • The opinion of cost is approximate and is intended to provide Purkiss Rose -RSI and the City of Hermosa Beach with an overall cost impression for budget purposes only. Significant uncertainties are inherent in determining retrofit cost. These uncertainties may only be resolved reliably by completing final design and soliciting bid prices for construction. • An allowance for special working conditions is included in Table 6-1. The special working conditions may include but are not limited to: crowded conditions, operation of the facility, site access, and hours of operation. • The allowance shown in Table 6-1 is only an estimate, a value which may be adjusted based upon individual experiences. O The opinion of cost is based on the assumption of reasonable access to all areas requiring work. Our observations regarding access were factored into the opinion of cost. If access to certain areas is more L: Wmericas41ZackWennosa Beach Piertite Guard ToweP final Repor \T we,Rpt-Chd.dacfiry 6-1 ChapterProbable Retrofit Cost difficult or restricted, the suggested opinion of cost in this report could increase. Expenses associated with relocation of personnel, equipment, downtime and interruption of necessary utilities are not included in the opinion of cost. • Costs for planned architectural upgrades and finishes, relocation of glazing planes, as well as, handicap, fire or other building code upgrades, if required, are not included. The opinion represents current cost (July 2002). Higher costs may be incurred if the work is performed at a much later time. Higher costs may be incurred if other structural deficiencies or problem areas requiring attention are discovered during the final stage and/or during 'the actual construction phase. The cost does not include an allowance for the contractor overhead and profit.. In addition, expenses related to asbestos abatement, if any, and hazardous material removals, if any, are not included. The following were not included in the preliminary opinion of cost and should be considered when budgeting the project:. construction management; consulting fees; inspection and testing fees; ._ geotechnical fees; construction contingency; escalation; business interruption; relocation of equipment or personnel. 6.2 Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Costs A quantity take -off, based on the retrofit concept, was made and unit prices applied to the measured quantities in order to arrive at a rough order of magnitude construction cost estimate for the proposed work. The unit prices include the material, labor, and equipment costs for each specific trade. A L•lAmericas1P2actMarmosa Beach Pie^Life Guar Tcwer Finai P.eportffowerRpl-Cao.dadiry 6-2 Chapter 6 —Probable Retrofit Cost • summary of the calculated preliminary construction cost is presented in Table 6-1. Please note that the calculated cost does not include the applicable costs of additional engineering services, building permit fees, business interruption and relocation of personnel and equipment. One should also keep in mind that a preliminary opinion of probable cost is only one way to best predict the probable construction costs and is based on available information. In estimating, one attempts to be as close as possible to the actual costs but the actual cost will not be known until the completion of the work. When estimating, there is always more than one way of measuring and pricing items and, therefore, there will always be different opinions about the estimating procedures. Table 6-1 ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE RETROFIT COST (( r f � •) rr _wa1+r�1 12> 't{ . Z... rt'J -�* j..4_ 4 B�tticlttg'`� ;Buildrng��rRetrofit -.' rlrYlSr4 .tt'.ti t " �r, t, S,A J y iL , t F tk Y t't f r _ 4 r !t /i � + 1 � � IS{4 °SI t Y r'�t�'(I th•k t ;,'(t,af Rxat5li.. {t 16 �x t'J�L1i r.. 1 i ."I}'^'1 "{L :,lMt�j�' '',...11 i3 f Area �,Cos.t (i . Ft2 Y� �!x t Yx. vs1 1 4 i !.f: h,.. I f Y.YrI . r, 4 t� „ sf �'+"t'r'lr`lt. p 'i S. i Z4 '�r4 4 P M ✓. -P... j` 1 r. I, ,�. ..'i� r.+qi•"'�L r x� ,i s t! ' khs Y( r ck t ` t i4 tl.� Int J yh .r F:M t trra 1,, w'r't'J,.�. Yr ��x Pa�y7 ypy �C ter "t, d'.� r�'j''i' 1L. Vit Y� 'T M''Z t.:Cost,`rtr ' xit { tl �.. rk 2' 3� ($f F,)<C�o ,,ff,,,, 1 / }r 5 s t ''yS.14 f'ut I�r iri: ,v }rtr. ^01,:n1}.' :ti t i . JAllowance � .Sk1 r'✓t, 't '� wf„ .•Tdrii t 'x +; i ht ; for���Yts :.-a i t Working mf y k; _S� 7 ; i h n d ttt o ns % rG `r rt`rir�s a (. tr,,+ ek f /0r� 5 13k' �r L/L 4 tt�'*�; (.Pit .�Ntl:'ir.i 4' S4 ! �.� c'1 F • djus.%d' ,rY 74 �a� it u..i=F?ui�'''IY1d}+fi y �i, 4?�Retr>oftt,YhA,cirs�ste.5., p jF�sy �M';t}7 4 �rCost� <.iT A�„?�r4 ✓�z r i P,u t ,r , tE (.$} t �� �n 4t r t 5 I ¢ ebbe �.r f l x 7ii 4t r dt d '�V 1 i' 4n,'}`^lki-, n Sfrr ot: �jy �t 4 ��'E. u I' iY,'2 '4�,i}', ,tN dF , 4 �( �, ost:;. , i • ,} r(;$IF)_ G, st �kr t"4" e„ r t1 Y'. t F +',t,t'� _Fk`dk: ✓i �.l �ri� ;1. Lifeguard Lifeguard Tower 2,016 $25,978 $12.89 30% $33,771. $16.76 Total Estimated Construction Cost $25,978 $12.89 30% $33,771 $16.76 L:'?mericasV?ZacMiermesa Saacp Pier'Lira Guam TcwerlFinat RepartgowerRpt-Cnd.doc'iry 6-3 INT g • Chapter 7 - References 1. Uniform Building Code (UBC), 1997 Edition, International Conference of Building Officials, 1997. 2. Report of Geotechnical Exploration: Proposed Upgrade of Hermosa Beach Pier Plaza, Hermosa Beach, CA, January 2, 2001. 3 "FEMA 351: Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade. Criteria for Existing . . Welded Steel Moment Frame Buildings, July 2000. 4. "FEMA 350: Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment Frame Buildings, July 2000 L:WmericaslRZackHemasa Beach PlerlLite Guard TewartFinal Repc \TcwerRpt•Ch7•dan'ity 7.1 INTERNATIONAL • Appendix A - Seismic Strengthening Scheme ■ INTERN AVONA IA ETABS v8.05 - File: Tower1.16 - July 16,2002 13:17 3-D View Kip -in Units Consulting • JOB NO. 1 OW1-02.. JOB L1c--;oft,,-F-9 CALC. NO. SUBJECT Fcz:7r rf-AM (kV:A /at' (B(1) • 12.5,t6•5 SHEET NO BY 302- DATE Siz)`2- CHK'D DATE 141-52 11__W F27 c2.) (1-9) CrIF 14 WF 5c) (B.) 14W F3t) 14514, ((34) 12.5165 firt 0 • -d co it. co t. • est 711 we- A (s) _e, -x) 5:;-/TItz.1 ABS Conwiting JOB NO t0 41 02 JOB k. 5. Ii1 6.11-)AP-.9ToW . CALC. NO SUBJECT mrd f>I 4IN.Y SHEAT NO. BY 7 DATE CHK'D DATE Covulting JOB NO. 0°AI-02-JOB moi. 5• u1%6C,UA�'0 Tov p- CALC. NO. SUBJECT '2- LVEL F AM I /A` $' • 1422 (17w9 ) I ( ) (815) (13n) 14WP3o I4wr43 (85) 0 • -(514) ct SHEET NO BY (202- DATE S%CHK'D DATE 12WF27 erre t ) (j'w3) i I1 if t • 11 1 • l} -W -1\405A 13 APOTo v1' :xi:•:•;:..�."�'-gym-- ETABS v8.05 - File: Tower2.5 - July 16,2002 13:15 3-D View - Kip -in Units Consulting • JOB NO. er-)1-/4C42-JOB 14, UP<2-I2 TO1"0- CALC. NO. SUBJECT 4:a11+-‘ eueJgri.0)3 112 -'FIT PS5t6k\ Foor 5Y2 LV 1' V1::\ LeV • 25/ • 2e. 11:11 11 SHEET NO. BY r12 -VZ DATE CHK'D DATE 1 ' L 1-- . /../ / 'Y'," ////tY 4<hr 1,e/P. / i • 1/1//// /7 ( 5 .). & ' Ti*,. 4411 v. , t•-/ , i r/ / /./ / ' " ' 11'' //e/ 1 . , • //// / i .. i .//:,:,• itAt • / :c '/// 1 /—/ , :4, //////// . . ,..,, 1 / r///:///1/4/////2////.///./.. 5 r . r-,% 1 L .• i 1 i4 \ \ • I 1 —7.-...1 / ....., . \ • 1 1 1 i I • G ---f I 1 ‘rd Vs; trZAVE; Fo;,,A4A ITT2 SL: A-11 araj S' 3.' L. 1 . . • (E) 7 INTERNATX]`:AL EQE INTERNATIONAL • SHEAT NO JOB NO. t /2131- JOB -t f3' L %uiZo f BY DATE 7. CALC. NO SUBJECT CHK'D DATE EQE INTERNATIONAL • ar-ftmr.e—k. INTERNATIONAL JOB NO it002-JOB 1-1.15; tAr-c-A4-.9 Tow 174)--- CALC:-NO SUBJECT SHEET NO. BY R°7-- DATE CHK'D DATE 110-2_ '312,Ac-•e-/;24,A (T7- 4 rt,.ras) IrarvN 4 r- EQE INTERNATIONAL ._...„..._,I. D•TMATIONAL JOB NO. 1.%1V- JOB t41 E!7 Lr.uAn Tovv_eia. • • CALC. NO. SUBJECT SHEET NO BY ta, 7. - DATE CHK'D DATE r.7 ff\r INTERNATIONAL EQE INTERNATIONAL • • SHEET NO JOB NO. LO 44O JOB H, t3. uA To W BY PbZ DATE 7���i.. CALC. NO SUBJECT CHK'D DATE (E -) i -Y cOU PIRP I) (e)14v' o • :t•:: moi: r�.,fr,'�r.- � I1 I rests • n C2 ��t16 Rim 1.0 csr c �' INTERNATIONAL EQE INTERNATIONAL • • SHEET NO JOB NO. tC,412-0.2- JOB LIPPUP-P--0 row PR BY 1202_ DATE 7/0,7 CALC. NO SUBJECT CHK'D DATE tt2 AQ491-E6 61 1716 vis1 — Typ 1 4_ , • in 1 --Cs I -6; kl; le" 13.-.."-0-4 L -1A (.1.24 Le ) ) c LD (b) peg I S. 754 (pr2e -17P-1 U -C-'47) ,411 • 147CTA:2- .P1: • Appendix B - Estimate of Probable Retrofit Cost Structural Steel Seismic Retrofit Cost Estimate Hermosa Beach Life Guard Tower .. Hermosa Beach, CA 07/26/02 Description Takeoff • Labor Labor Material Material • Equip Total Total Cony Quantity Man Hrs Amount Amount Amount Cost/Unit Amount Factor 10. STRUCT STEEL / WELDING Diag brace HSS 4x4x3/8 16.00 ea 120.00 7,252 3,266 1,135 728.34 /ea 11,653 Web stiffners, sixteen locations, Det 1, 3 16.00 ea 24.00 1.508 5.125 Ib/ea 63 - 98.16 /ea 1,571 Base plate, eight locations, Det 1, 3 16.00 ea 24.00 1,508 30.500 Ib/ea 373 - 117.58 /ea 1,881 Web stiffners, eight locations, Det 2 Bent plate at masonry, Det 4 8.00 ea 20.00 ea T 18.00 1,131 7.500 Ib/ea 46 - 147.10 /ea 1,177 30.00 1,885 16.600 lb/ea 254 - 106.94 /ea 2,139 Bent plate at floor, Parallel, Det 5 52.00 ea ' ' ' ' 39.00 2,450 2.550 Ib/ea 101 - 49.07 /ea .2,552 Bent plate at floor, Perendiicular, Det 5 44.00 ea 33.00 2,073 4.057 Ib/ea 137 - 50.23 /ea ': 2,210 Brace/Beam connection, WT6x39.5 at mid point, Det 2 8.00 ea 12.00 754 0.007 ea/lb 842 199.51 /ea 1,596 Deputy inspections 20.00 ea . 12.00 1,200 19,761 - 5,082 ' - 1,135 60.00 /ea 1,200 25,979 10. STRUCT STEEL I WELDING Labor Material Equipment ABS Consulting Estimate Totals 19,761 5,082 1,135 86.000 hrs Total 25,978 19.329 Isf 312.000 hrs Page 1 Cost Estimate. Life Guard Tower Seis Retrofit Hermosa Beach, CA 7/26/02 ESTIMATE QUALIFICATIONS: introduction This cost opinion has been prepared to reflect the probable cost for the proposed seismic retrofit at the specified lifeguard tower in Hermosa Beach, California. This cost opinion is based on the following: .1. Structural sketches eight sheets total, including Isometric dated 7/15/02; Structural floor plan and elevation dated 5/2/02; and details 1 through 5 dated 7/2/02. 2. Reasonable assumptions. Specific Exclusions: 1. Unforeseen sub -surface / unidentified hidden existing building and site conditions that may impact the proposed design and/or affect construction work, sequence and schedule. 2. General contractor general conditions. 3. General contractor overhead and profit. 4. General contractor bond and insurance costs. 5. Design and permitting costs. 6. All other consultant fees and services. 7.. All testing costs. 8. Hazardous material.and contamination abatement. 9. Removal or replacement or structural steel fireproofing. 10.AlI interior demo and remodeling work (all steel assumed accessible). Specific Inclusions: 1. All structural steel work as described in the cost estimate. 2. Structural steel inspection. Rick Hentschel, President Ascend Management Services, Inc. Page 1 of 1 ABS CONSULTING 300 Commerce Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 Telephone (714) 734-4242 FAX (-714) 734-4252 NORTH AMERICA 321 Warren Avenue Fremont, CA 94539 Telephone (510) 580-2800 FAX (800) 329-9527- 11400 29-952711400 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 425 Los Angeles. CA 90064 • Telephone (310) 478-8300 FAX (310) 478-7777 1111 Broadway, 10th Floor Oakland, CA 94607-5500`• Telephone (510) 817-3100 FAX (510) 663-1050 9275 Sky Park Court, Suite 110A San Diego. CA 92123 Telephone (858) 268-8818 28 Second Street, 4'= Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone (415) 989-2000 FAX (415) 541-9160 2942 Evergreen Parkway, Suite 302 Evergreen, CO 80439 Telephone (303) 674:2990 FAX (303) 674-8183 ,, 5301 Limestone Road, Suite 210 Wilmington, DE 19808' Telephone (302) 239-7310 FAX (302) 239-0306 7315 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 620 East Bethesda, MD 20814 Telephone (301) 907-9100 FAX (301) 907-0050 1848 Lackland HiHs Parkway St. Louis, MO 631463' Telephone (314) 994-7007 FAX (314) 994-0722 142 Portsmouth Avenue Stratham, NH 03885-2440" Telephone (603) 778=1144 FAX (603) 778-7495 1030 NW 16151 Place Beaverton, OR 97006 Telephone (503)533-4359 FAX (503) 533-4360 5 Birdsong Court Shillington, PA 19607 Telephone (610) 796-9080 FAX (610) 796-9081 1000 Technology Drive Knoxville, TN 37932-3353 Telephone (865)-966-5232 FAX (865)-966-5287 -ABSConsulti NORTH AMERICA (continued) 15600 San Pedro Avenue, Suite 400 San Antonio, TX 78232 Telephone (210) 495-5195 FAX (210) 495-5134 310 South Main, Suite 300 Salt Lake City. UT 84101 Telephone (801) 333-7676 FAX (801) 333-7677 713 Jadwin Avenue, Suite B Richland, WA 99352 Telephone (509) 943-8824 FAX (509) 943-8825 1411 4th Avenue Building. Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101-2207 Telephone (206) 623-7231 FAX (206) 624-8268 UNITED KINGDOM Johnstone House, Rose Street Aberdeen AB101UD Scotland Telephone 44-1224-640241 FAX 440-1224-631078 Castle Terrace Aberdeen United Kingdom AB11 5FA Telephone 01224-579200 FAX 01224-579259 _ EQE House, The Beacons, Warrington Road Warrington, Cheshire United Kingdom WA3 6WJ Telephone 1925-287300 FAX 1925-287301. - 1 Frying Pan Alley London United Kingdom El 7HR Telephone 020-7377-4501 FAX 020-7377-4575 - MEXICO Ciudad del Carmen, Mexico Telephone 52-938-28384 Mexico City, Mexico Telephone 52-5-203-1023 Veracruz, Mexico Telephone 52-29-892584 SOUTH AMERICA Buenos Aires. Argentina 119 South Main Street. Suite 500 Telephone 54-11-4393-6684 Memphis. TN 38103 Telephone (901) 312-9144' FAX (901) 312-9145 17850 Diana Lane Houston. TX 77058-2527 I eiephone (281) 480-3800 FAX (2811 490-0070 Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil Telephone 55-21-518-3535 Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil Telephone 55-11-3846-8611 Valparaiso. Chile Telephone 56-32-253743 ABS CONSULTING 16855 Northchase Drive Houston, TX 77060 Telephone (281) 877-5800 FAX (281) 877-5803 EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST Sofia, Bulgaria Telephone 359-2 9632049 Paris. France Telephone (33) 1-44-79-01-01 Piraeus, Greece Telephone 30-1-429-3215 Genoa, Italy Telephone 39-010-254921 Rotterdam, Netherlands Telephone 31.10-206-0777 Doha, Qatar Telephone 974-4412938 Dammam, Saudi Arabia Telephone 966.3-827-4651 • Istanbul, Turkey Telephone 90-212-245-0160 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Telephone 971-2-6391611 . Dubai, United Arab Emirates Telephone 971-4-3520371 ASIA -PACIFIC Shanghai, China - Telephone 86-21-6322-6285 • Taiwan, China Telephone 886-7-201-6422 Mumbai, India Telephone 91-22-265-8952 Jakarta'indonesia Telephone 62-21-8379-3067 Tokyo, Japan Telephone 81.03 3351-5470 Yokohama, Japan Telephone 81-45-441-1000 Pusan, Korea Telephone 82-51-469-1560 Seoul, Korea Telephone 822 539-0461 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Telephone 603-227-227-32/29 Manila, Philippines Telephone 63-2-526-1094 Singapore Telephone 65 7793375 Bangkok, Thailand Telephone 66-2-266-6160 INTERNET World Wide Web: htip:i/www.absconsulting.com August 6, 2002 Harold Williams Director of Public Works Public Works Department City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Street Hermosa Beach, California issose -lei SUBJECT: Hermosa Beach Pier Renovation Project (00-131), Authorization for. Ad litional Service Agreement, Change Order Number Four, Dear Harold: • Purkiss Rose ,R,SIis writing this correspondence at the request of the City in regards tothe : Iermosa Beach Pier Renovation Project, specifically the structural status of the existing Lifeguar l Tower Building. At the direction of the Hermosa Beach City staff, PurkissRose-RSI and the pro sct team obtained the services of the project structural engineer, ABS Consulting - EQE Engineers, tt prepare a structural analysis report for the existing Lifeguard Tower Building. This request for s lditional services was presentedand processed as a Change Order, identified as Amendment Numt .3r Three by the City. EQE Engineers completed the Structural Analysis Report, dated July 29, 20( Z, which the project team presented to the City staff during a meeting at the Public Works Departme tt.offices on Tuesday, July 30, 2002. The Structural Analysis Report, titled, "Structural Evaluation and Strengthening of the iermosa Beach Lifeguard Tower, Hermosa. Beach, Ca," has been reviewed by ,the project team with the following general conclusion: The Structural Analysis on the original structure shows :hat "the building's existing lateral load -resisting system is inadequate to withstand the earthquake f rtes that would be generated during a major seismic event. The calculations expose several deficiern ies in the lateral load -resisting system existing in both principal directions. The most significant de iciencies in the subject building include excessive flexural stresses in the columns and excessive lat :ral story drift when subjected to current design lateral loads (earthquake)." The issue with the findings of the Structural Analysis Report is the decision to either rt trofit the existing building structure or raze the existing building and construct a new : ,ifeguard Tower/Women's Locker Room Building. There are two primary factors in considering ell ier of the solutions concerning the current building. The first would be the cost of retrofitting th : existing building. The second issue would be the impact regarding the City's Coastal Developme it Permit (CDP). It is our understanding that, according to the City staff, the razing of the current ,ifeguard Tower Building and the development of a new facility would not.be a CDP issue due to tl a latitude given in the CD? concerning.the allowable development.of building square footage. G ren these issues, it appears that the primary factor is the construction cost of retrofitting the currer : building structure. Lun'Is Cap r: Arc:tlitcitI/re fiecreution and l'3 -t: 1't:nuting t i l ttotth 11 ttbr gait..v:ucl i't lIt rou. California Jlit:S'3 VAX; 1714) (t71-1 It tt t7tr.) ti7i.'1.1:111 ATTACHMENT 2 Ed WdTb:80 EWE 90 t>� •6,Wo?JA • Scenario A • Page 2 The design team has reviewed the Structural Analysis Report and has estimated a construction cost to retrofit the current building and a construction cost to build a new Lifeguard Tower/Women's locker Room Facility. The probable total construction cost to upgrade and rehabilitate the existing Lifeguard Tower Building would amount to approximately $650,000.00. This cost does not include design fees, engineering fees, permitting and all City of Hermosa Beach supplemental and administrative costs. We would recommend adding approximately 20% contingency for permitting and City of Hermosa Beach supplemental/administrative costs. The design scope of services would include a new structural building system, new exterior wall panels and glass and an elevator system. The design and engineering fees would be as follows:. Architectural Fees (includes structural, electrical and mechanical engineering): Civil Engineering Fees: Landscape Architectural Fees: Total -Scenario A .4 $90,500.00 $4,025.00 $9,750.00 5104,275.00 Scenario A fees do. not include the cost of environmental documents or Asbestos and Lead Abatement Reports. It isnot possible to determine a realistic construction cost to develop a new Lifeguard Tower facility until such time the building is programmed, designed and the amount ofbuilt in equipment, amenities and fixtures have been identified. If a new Lifeguard Tower facility were to be designed and built in the current Lifeguard Tower location, the design team would recommend that the plans for the proposed 480, square foot Women's Shower/Locker addition be abandoned . and that these improvementsbe incorporated into the new TowerBuilding. If the same program functions were to remain for the new Tower Building, the probable construction cost for a new Tower Facility would be approximately $600,000.00 to 5750,000.00. This would not include a temporary Lifeguard Facility to house the Lifeguards during construction of the new Tower, design and engineering fees, permitting and all City of Hermosa Beach supplemental and administrative costs. If we were subtracting the construction budget for the Women's Shower/Locker Room addition and the exterior "face lift" for the current Tower building of $200,000.00, the additional funds needed for the new Tower Building would be in the range of $400,000.00 to $550,000.00. We would recommend adding a 20% contingency for permitting and City of lermosaBeach supplemental/administrative costs. The design scope of services would include new design concepts (a total of two) for the new Lifeguard Tower Facility. It would also include construction documents for the Lifeguard Tower Building with approximately 3,000 square feet of building space including a woman's shower/locker room, an elevator system, offices, first aid facility, meeting rooms and sleeping quarters. The new facility would incorporate all the latest Uniform BuildingCode requirements. The design and engineering fees would be as follows: Ed WUEP:80 Z00Z 90 '6nd . '0N XdJ : WOd.d • Page 3 Architectural Fees (includes structural, electrical and mechanical engineering): $92,500.00 Civil Engineering Fees: $2,875.00 Geotechnical Supplemental Report for New Structure: $5,000.00 Landscape Architectural Fees: $12,000.00 Total -Scenario B $112,375.00 Reproduction and Delivery costs are not included in Scenarios .A or B. The design team would recommend a reproduction allowance of $3,000.00 for either Scenario. Initiating the services for Scenario's A orB would have an impact on the project schedule and would. result in extending the project schedule by two (2) to three (3) months: - • It would the recommendation of the design team that the City ofHermosa Beach 'consider Scenario B as the .program solution. The design team feels strongly that there are a number of unknown construction costs and conditions relating to the Scenario A solution which will only be discovered during the retrofitting process. These unknown conditions may impact the construction costs, design and engineering fees and supplemental costs identified in Scenario A. If either of these Scenarios appears acceptable to the City of Hermosa Beach, please sign both originals of the attached form titled "Authorization for Additional Services Request'. We have enclosed forms for both Scenarios. After signing the appropriate documents, please return both originals to Purkiss Rose -.RSI for processing. We will sign both originals and return one signed original to the City for Agency processing. Should the City have any questions regarding the different Scenarios A and B, the scope of services or the design fees, please feel free to call me at (714) $71- 3638. We look forward to a successful project for the City of Hermosa Beach, the County of Los Angeles Lifeguards and the community. Sincerely, ickel, ASLA Principal cc Triston Malabanan City of Hermosa Beach bd Ndzb:80 Z00Z 90 '611d '0N X±d : NO�IJ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOURTH AMENDMENT (OPTION 1) PROJECT No. CIP 00-630 PIER RENOVATION, PHASE Ill THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Purkiss•Rose - RSI, made and entered into this 13th day of August 2002 at Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, through . its duly elected, qualified and acting MAYOR, hereinafter called the CITY, and the Purkiss•Rose RSI, Inc., hereinafter called the CONSULTANT. WHEREAS, City entered into a'Professional Services Agreement with Purkiss•Rose - RSI, Inc. on February 8, 2000 for the preparation of detailed plans, specifications, cost estimates and otherconstruction documentsfor architectural upgrades to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier; and WHEREAS, City has determined the Project No. CIP 00-630 will require additional professional services to include design services; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of theforegoing recitals and terms and conditions, the parties agree as follows: 1. Article I — Scope of Work is amended to read: "CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to City the services set forth in the Scope of Work in attached hereto as Exhibit A and made part of this Third Amendment." 2. Article II - Costs: "The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or any part of the work performed under this First Amendment at the rates and in the manner established in Exhibit A. Total expenditure made after this contract shall not exceed the sum of $107,275 ($104,275 design work plus $3,000 reproduction and delivery cost allowance). This fee includes all expenses, consisting of all incidental blueprinting, photography, travel and miscellaneous costs, estimated to be accrued during the life of the contract. It also includes any escalation or inflation factors anticipated. No increase in fees will be allowed during the life of the contract. Any increase in contract amount of scope shall be by express written amendment approved by the CITY and CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for costs incurred in the performance hereof as are allowable under the provisions of Part 1-14 of the Federal Procurement Regulations." ATTACHMENT 3 • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • MAYOR: Mayor, City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: PURKISS•ROSE - RSI, Inc. President Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk Vice President APPROVED AS TO FORM: City.Attomey F:\B95\PWFILES\CIP\00-630\PURKISS ROSE PSA FOURTH AMENDMENT -A- 08-13-02.DOC EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK: CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS 1. Revise and modify: a) demolition plan b) original construction details c) lifeguard station building plans for civil, structural, electrical and mechanical engineering work 2. Prepare new: a) construction details b) site amenities plan c) lifeguard station building retrofit plans including floor plans, sections, and elevations d) construction cost estimates 3. Include two (2) additional meetings/presentations to the City Council and five (5) additional meetings with City Staff. . COSTS: Design services Reproduction allowances Total 104,275 3,000 $ 107,275 • • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOURTH AMENDMENT (OPTION 2) PROJECT No. CIP 00-630 PIER RENOVATION, PHASE Ill THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hermosa. Beach and Purkiss•ROSe - RSI, made and entered into this 13th day of August 2002 at Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, through its duly elected, qualified and acting MAYOR, . hereinafter called . the CITY, 'and the Purkiss•Rose RSI, Inc., hereinafter called the CONSULTANT. WHEREAS, City entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Purkiss•Rose - RSI, Inc. on February 8, 2000 for the preparationof detailed plans, specifications, cost estimates and other construction documents for architectural upgrades to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier; and WHEREAS, City has determined the Project No. CIP 00-630 will require additional professional services to include design services; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and terms and conditions, the parties agree as follows: 1. Article I — Scope of Work is amended to read: "CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to City the services set forth in the Scope of Work in attached hereto as Exhibit A and made part of this Third Amendment." 2. Article II Costs: "The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or any part of the work performed under this First Amendment at the rates and in the manner established in Exhibit A. Total expenditure made after this contract shall not exceed the sum of $11.5,375 ($112,375 design work plus $3,000 reproduction and delivery cost allowance). This fee includes all expenses, consisting of all incidental blueprinting, photography, travel and miscellaneous costs, estimated to be accrued during the life of the contract. It also includes any escalation or inflation factors anticipated. No increase in fees will be allowed during the life of the contract. Any increase in contract amount of scope shall be by express written amendment approved by the CITY and CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for costs incurred in the performance hereof as are allowable under the provisions of Part 1-14 of the Federal Procurement Regulations." ATTACHMENT 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAYOR: Mayor, City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney.. PURKISS•ROSE - RSI, Inc. President Vice President F:\B95\PWFILES\CIP\00-6301PURKISS ROSE PSA FOURTH AMENDMENT -B- 08-13-02.DOC EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK: SCOPE OF WORK: PART 1 —.DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 1) Meet with county to review and finalize the building program for the new tower 2) Develop preliminary floor plan for review and approval PART 2 — CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS 1. Revise and modify: a) demolition plan b) original construction details 2. Prepare new: a) construction layout site plan (horizontal control plan) b) construction details c) site amenities plan d) Lifeguard station building plans including floor plans, sections, and elevations e) Lifeguard station building plans to include all civil, structural, electrical, and mechanical'engineering work f); Supplemental geotechnical report for the new lifeguard station building g) construction cost estimates 3. Include two (2) additional meetings/presentations to the City Council and five (5) additional meetings with City Staff. - • COSTS: Design services $ 112,375 Reproduction allowances 3,000 Total $ .115,375 • Honorable Mayor and Members of July 30, 2002 // — Regular Meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council August 13, 2002 AMENDMENT TO THE STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION CONTROL ORDINANCE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FOR PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF amending the current Storm Water and Urban Runoff Pollution Control Regulations ordinance. Background: The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (Regional Board), issued a municipal Storm Sewer Permit to the County of Los Angeles. (Los Angeles County MS4 Permit) in July 1996. The Permit designated Los Angeles County as. the Principle Permittee, and eighty-five incorporated cities (includingHermosa. Beach), as Co -Permittees, to control and minimize the discharge of pollutants associated with storm water and urban runoff. Subsequently, on November 26, 1996, the City Council adopted Ordinance . No. 96- 1165, establishing storm water controls and regulations for the City. On January 26, 2000; the Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted Resolution No. , R00-02, enacting the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), thereby expanding the region's required storm water control and regulation responsibilities by further addressing the issues of construction and development planning. On January 9, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-1211, amending the Municipal Code, thus providing for the Implementation of Storm Water and Urban Runoff Controls for Planning and Construction of New Development and Redevelopment. Under the provisions of the Regional Board's new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit, No. CAS004001 (Order No. 01-182, dated December 13, 2001), Los Angeles County and the Co -Permittees have until September 1, 2002 to cause the new SUSMP regulations contained in the Permit to take effect. Analysis: In accordance with the terms of the Regional Board's mandate, the City Attorney has prepared the attached Ordinance for Council's review and adoption. The attached Ordinance provides the legal. authority to enforce the new SUSMP requirements contained in the Permit, which include: 6f • A. Planning Program Changes Treatment of storm water and SUSMP requirements apply to all Planning "Priority" Projects. Single-family homes are exempt from redevelopment requirements. Hillside single-family homes under one acre of surface area are exempt from the numerical design criteria. Numerical design criteria apply to projects that create 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface areas within, adjacent to or discharging directly into an environmentally sensitive area. "Maintenance Agreement and Transfer" requirements for all priority projects with structural and treatment control BMP's (Best Management Practices) to ensure their upkeep and function in perpetuity. Construction Program Changes 1. Applicants for construction sites, one acre and greater of disturbed area, are required to submit a Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (LSWPPP), on which the project engineer/architect and property owner or property owner's agent must sign statements certifying they (in essence) are in compliance with applicable storm water pollution regulations. These sites must be inspected at least once during the rainy season (October 1 April 15) and; 2. After March 10, 2003, construction sites one acre (currently five acres) or more, must obtain a State NPDES Permit and prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Fiscal Impact: Since the implementation of the SUSMP requirements in August of 2000, the direct fiscal impact on the City has been minimal. The impact of the SUSMP requirements is directly proportional to the number of projects submitted that meet the threshold of applicability (a Planning "Priority" Project), of which the City has had few. The effect of amending the Storm Water and Urban Runoff Ordinance would similarly be related to the amount of priority projects applied for in the future. Attachment: Ordinance Respectfully submitted, h4-0-. _JJ Homayo n Behboodi Associate Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Step E'urrel City Manager F:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\storm water amend ordin 8-13-02.doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION CONTROL ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FOR PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Section 8.44.020 of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "8.44.020 Findings A. The Congress of the United States (hereinafter "Congress") has determined that pollutants contained in storm water and urban runoff are responsible for the environmental degradation of oceans, lakes, rivers, and other waters of the United States. B. Congress, in 1987, amended the Clean Water Act of 1972 to reduce pollutants discharged into the waters of the United States by extending National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (hereinafter "NPDES") requirements to regulate storm water and urban runoff discharge into municipal storm drain systems. C. Storm water and urban runoff flows, from individual properties onto streets, then through storm drains to coastal waters along the City of Hermosa Beach. D. The City of Hermosa Beach is a co -permittee under the "Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Storm Water and Urban Runoff Discharges Within the County of Los Angeles, and the Incorporated Cities Therein, Except the City of Long Beach" (Order No. 01-182), NPDES Permit No. CAS00401, dated December 13, 2001, issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region, which also serves as a NPDES permit under the Federal Clean Water Act and as a co -permittee, the city is required to implement procedures with respect to the entry of non -storm water discharges into the municipal storm water system. E. In order to control, in a cost-effective manner, the quantity and quality of storm water and urban runoff to-the.maximum extent practicable, the adoption of reasonable regulations, as set forth herein, is essential." Section 2. Section 8.44.030(C) of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: -1- • "C. This chapter is also intended to provide the city with the legal authority necessary to control discharges to and from those portions of the municipal storm water system over which it has jurisdiction as required by the municipal NPDES permit and to hold dischargers to the municipal storm water system accountable for their contributions of pollutants and flows." Section 3. Section 8.44.040 of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to add the following definitions in appropriate alphabetical sequence: "Construction" means constructing, clearing, grading, or excavation that results in soil disturbance. Construction includes structure teardown. It does not include routine maintenance to maintain original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of facility; emergency construction activities required to immediately protect public health and safety; interior remodeling with no outside exposure of construction material or construction waste to storm water; mechanical permit work; or sign permit work. "Control" means to minimize, reduce, eliminate, or prohibit by technological, legal, contractual or other means, the discharge of pollutants from an activity or activities. "Development" means any construction, rehabilitation, redevelopment or reconstruction of any public or private residential project (whether single-family, multi -unit or planned unit. development); industrial, commercial, retail and other non-residential projects, including public. agency projects; or mass grading for future construction. It does not include routine maintenance to maintain original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of facility, nor does it include emergency construction activities required to immediately protect public health and safety. "Directly Adjacent" means situated within 200 feet of the contiguous zone required for the continued maintenance, function, and structural stability of the environmentally sensitive area. "Director" means the Director of Public Works of the City or the Director's designee. "Discharge" means when used without qualification the "discharge of a pollutant." "Discharging Directly" means outflow from a drainage conveyance system that is composed entirely or predominantly of flows from the subject property, development, subdivision, or industrial facility, and not commingled with the flows from adjacent lands. "Discharge of a Pollutant" means: any addition of any "pollutant" or combination of pollutants to "waters of the United States" from any "point source" or, any addition of any pollutant or combination of pollutants to the waters of the "contiguous zone" or the ocean from any point source other than a vessel or other floating craft which is being used as a means of transportation. The -term discharge includes additions of pollutants into waters of the United States from: surface runoff which is collected or channeled by man; discharges through pipes, sewers, or other conveyances owned by a State, municipality, or other person which do not lead to a treatment works; and discharges through pipes, sewers, or other conveyances, leading into privately owned treatment works. -2- "Disturbed Area" means an area that is altered as a result of clearing,grading, and/or excavation. "Environmentally Sensitive Area" ("ESA") means an area in which plant or animal life or their habitats are either rare or especially valuable because of their special nature or role in an ecosystem and which would be easily disturbed or degraded by human activities and developments (California Public Resources Code § 30107.5). Areas subject to storm water mitigation requirements are areas designated as Significant Ecological Areas by the County of Los Angeles (Los Angeles County Significant Areas Study, Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning (1976) and amendments); an area designated as a Significant Natural Area by the California Department of Fish and Game's Significant Natural Areas Program, provided that area has been field verified by the Department of Fish and Game; an area listed in the Basin Plan as supporting the Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Species (RARE) beneficial use; and an area identified by the City as environmentally sensitive. "Inspection" means entry and the conduct of an on-site review of a facility and its operations, at reasonable times, to determine compliance with specific municipal or other legal requirements. The steps involved in performing an inspection, include, but are not limited to: 1. Pre;inspection documentation research; 2. Request for entry; 3. Interview of facility personnel; 4. Facility walk-through. 5. Visual observation of the condition of facility premises; 6. Examination and copying of records as required; 7. Sample collection (if necessary or required); 8. Exit conference (to discuss preliminary evaluation); and, 9. Report preparation, and if appropriate, recommendations for coming into compliance. "Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP)" means the standard for implementation of storm water management programs to reduce pollutants in storm water, including management practices, control techniques and system, design and engineering methods, and such other provisions as the Administrator or the State determines appropriate for the control of such pollutants. See also State Board Order WQ 2000-11 at page 20. "Planning Priority Projects" mean those projects that are required to incorporate appropriate storm water mitigation measures into the design plan for their respective project, -3- including: 1. Ten (10) or more unit homes (includes single family homes, multifamily homes, condominiums, and apartments); A One Hundred -Thousand (100,000) or more square feet of impervious surface area industrial/commercial development; after March 10, 2003, one acre or more of impervious surface area industrial/commercial development; 3. Automotive service facilities (SIC 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-7534, and 7536-7539); 4. Retail gasoline outlets; 5. Restaurants (SIC 5812); 6. Parking lots Five Thousand (5,000) square feet or more of surface area or with 25 or more parking spaces; 7. Redevelopment projects in subject categories that meet Redevelopment thresholds; 8. Projects located in or directly adjacent to or discharging directly to an ESA, which meet the thresholds described herein; and 9. Those projects that require the implementation of a site-specific plan to mitigate post -development storm water for new development not requiring a SUSMP but which may potentially have adverse impacts on post -development storm water quality, and where the following project characteristics exist: (a) Vehicle or equipment fueling areas; (b) Vehicle or equipment maintenance areas, including washing and repair; (c) Commercial or industrial waste handling or storage; (d) 'Outdoor handling or storage of hazardous materials; (e) Outdoor manufacturing areas; (f) Outdoor food handling or processing; (g) Outdoor animal care, confinement, or slaughter; or (h) Outdoor horticulture activities." "Project" means all development, redevelopment, and land disturbing activities. "Runoff' means any runoff including storm water and dry weather flows from a drainage area that reaches a receiving water body or subsurface. During dry weather it is typically -4- • • comprised of base flow either contaminated with pollutants or uncontaminated, and nuisance flows. "Significant Redevelopment" means land -disturbing activity that results in the creation or addition or replacement of 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area on an already developed site." "Site" means the land or water area where any "facility or activity" is physically located or conducted, including adjacent land used in connection with the facility or activity. "Storm event" means a rainfall event that produces more than 0.1 inch of precipitation in 24 hours unless specifically stated otherwise. Section 4. Section 8.44.040 of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to substitute the following definitions for and in place of the existing definitions, as follows: "Hillside" means property located in an area with known erosive soil conditions, where the development contemplates grading on any natural slope that is twenty-five percent or greater and where grading contemplates cut or fill slopes. "Illicitdischarge" means any discharge to the storm drain system that is prohibited under local, state or federal statutes, ordinances, codes or regulations. The term illicit discharge includes all non -storm water discharges except discharges pursuant to a separate NPDES permit, discharges that are identified in Part 1, "Discharge Prohibitions" of Order 01-182, and discharges authorized by the Regional Board Executive Officer. "Municipal NPDES permit" means the "Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Storm Water and Urban Runoff Discharges Within the County of Los Angeles, and the Incorporated Cities Therein, Except the City of Long Beach" (Order No. 01-182), NPDES Permit No.CAS00401, dated December 13, 2001, issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Los Angeles Region, and any successor permit to that permit. "NPDES permit" means any waste discharge requirements issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Los Angeles Region or the State Water Resources Control Board as an NPDES permit pursuant to Water Code Section 13370 (other than the Municipal NPDES Permit). "Redevelopment" means, on an already developed site, the creation or addition of at least five thousand (5,000) square feet of impervious surfaces, as such term is defined in the current version of the SUSMP approved by the Regional Board. Redevelopment includes, but is not limited to the following activities that meet the minimum standards set forth in this definition: !(1) thetexpansion'of a building footprint or addition or replacement of a structure;: (2) structural development, including an increase in gross floor area and/or exterior construction or remodeling; (3) replacement of impervious surface that is not part of a routine maintenance activity and (4) land disturbing activities related to structural or impervious surfaces. Redevelopment does not include routine maintenance activities that are conducted to maintain -5 • • original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, original purpose of. facility or emergency redevelopment activity required to protect public health safety. "Restaurant" means a facility that sells prepared foods and drinks for consumption, including stationary lunch counters and refreshment stands selling prepared foods and drinks for immediate consumption. (SIC code 5812). Section 5. The definition of the term "Automotive Repair Shop" set forth in Section 8.44.040 of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby repealed and the following new definition is hereby added in its place to read as follows: "Automotive Service Facilities" means a facility that is categorized in any one of the following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes: 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-7534, or 7536-7539 (as amended). . Section 6. Section 8.44.060(A) of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "A. Illicit Discharges. and Connections. It is prohibited to establish, use, maintain, or continue illicit connections to the municipal storm water system, or to commence or continue any illicit discharges to 'the municipal storm water system. This prohibition against illicit connections is expressly retroactive and applies to connections made in the past but excludes improvements to real property permitted over which uncontaminated storm water runoff flows." Section 7. Section 8.44.060(D)(4) of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is herebyamended to read as follows: "4. Discharges of untreated runoff to the MS4 from storage areas of materials containing grease, oil, or other hazardous substances (e.g. motor vehicle parts), and uncovered receptacles containing hazardous materials;" Section 8. Section 8.44.060(D)(5) of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "5. The discharge of chlorinated/brominated swimming pool water and filter backwash;" Section 9. Sections 8.44.060(D)(11) and 8.44.060(D)(12) are hereby added to Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: "11. Discharge of any food or food processing wastes; and 12. Discharge of any fuel and chemical wastes, animal wastes, garbage, batteries, and other materials that have potential adverse impacts on water quality." Section 10. Section 8.44.060(F) is hereby added to Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: "F. Industrial Activities. No person shall conduct any industrial activity in the city without obtaining all permits required by state or federal law, including a NPDES general industrial activity storm water permit when required. Persons conducting industrial activities within the city shall refer to the most recent edition of the Industrial/Commercial Best Management Practices Handbook, produced and published by the Storm Water Quality Task Force, for specific guidance on selecting best management practices for reducing pollutants in storm water discharges from industrial activities." Section 11. The preamble of Section 8.44.080 of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to substitute the following in its place: "Owners and occupants of property within the city shall implement Best Management Practices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to the municipal storm water system to the maximum extent practicable. Treatment and structural Best Management Practices shall be properly operated and maintained to prevent the breeding of vectors. Implementation includes, but is not limited to:" Section 12. Existing Section 8.44.080(B) of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach. Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end of the subparagraph: " Sweeping and collection of debris is encouraged for trash disposal." Section 13. Existing Section 8.44.090 of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to designate the existing provision as subparagraph "A" and to add subparagraphs B, C and D to read as follows: "A. Each industrial discharger, discharger associated with construction activity, or other discharger described in any general storm water permit addressing such discharges, as may be issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the State Water Resources Control Board, or the Regional Board, shall comply with all requirements of such permit. Each discharger identified in an individual NPDES permit shall comply with and undertake all activities required by such permit. Proof of compliance with any such permit may required in a form acceptable to the Authorized Enforcement Officer prior to the issuance of any grading, building or occupancy permits, or any other type of permit or license issued by the city. B. Storm water runoff containing sediment, construction materials or other pollutants from the construction site and any adjacent staging, storage or parking areas shall be reduced to the maximum extent practicable. The following shall apply to all construction projects within the city and shall be required from the time of land clearing, demolition or commencement of construction until receipt of a certificate of occupancy: 1.Sediment, construction wastes, trash and other pollutants from construction activities shall. be reduced to the maximum extent practicable. • • 2.Structural controls such as sediment barriers, plastic sheeting, detention ponds, filters, berms, and similar controls shall be utilized to the maximum extent practicable in order to minimize the escape of sediment and other pollutants from the site. 3.Between October 1 and April 15, all excavated soil shall be located on the site in a manner that minimizes the amount of sediment running onto the street, drainage facilities or adjacent properties. Soil piles shall be bermed or covered with plastic or similar materials until the soil is either used or removed from the site. 4. No washing of construction or other vehicles is permitted adjacent to a construction site. No water from the washing of construction vehicle of equipment on the construction site is permitted to run off the construction site and enter the municipal storm water system. 5. Trash receptacles must be situated at convenient locations on construction sites and must be maintained in such a manner that trash and litter does not accumulate on the site nor migrate off site. 6. Erosion from slopes and channels must be controlled through the effective combination of Best Management Practices. C. The owner -or authorized representative of the owner must certify in a form acceptable to the Director or duly authorized representative that Best Management Practices to control runoff from construction activity at all construction sites will be implemented prior to the issuance of any Building or Grading permit, D. A Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and Wet Weather Erosion Control Plan for construction sites one acre or greater shall be developed consistent with the municipal NPDES permit. Suchplans must be submitted tothe city for review and approval prior to the issuance of building or grading permits." Section 14. Existing Section 8.44.095(A) of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "A. Projects Requiring a SUSMP. The following projects for New Development and Redevelopment, if subject to Discretionary Project approval in the Zoning Ordinance of the City, shall require a Storm Water Mitigation Plan that complies with the most recent SUSMP and the current Municipal NPDES Permit: 1. Ten or more unit homes (includes developments of single family homes, condominiums and apartments); 2. A One Hundred Thousand (100,00) or more square feet of impervious surface area industrial/commercial development; after March 10, 2003, one acre or more of impervious surface area industrial/commercial development; 3. Automotive Service facilities (SIC 5013, 5014, 5542, 7532-7534 and 7536-7539); 4. Retail gasoline outlets; -8- i 5. Restaurants (SIC 5812); 6. Parking lots Five Thousand (5,000) square feet or more of surface area or with twenty-five (25) or more parking spaces; 7. Redevelopment projects in subject categories that meet Redevelopment thresholds; 8. Any New Development or Redevelopment project located in or directly adjacent to or discharging directly into an Environmentally Sensitive Area (as defined herein), where the development will: i. Discharge storm water and urban runoff that is likely to impact a sensitive biological species or habitat; and ii. Create 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface area." Section 15. Existing Section 8.44.095(B) of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "B. Incorporation of SUSMP into Project Plans. (1) An applicant for a New Development or a Redevelopment Project identified in paragraph A of this Section shall incorporate into the applicant's project plans a Storm Water Mitigation Plan ("SWMP"), which includes those Best Management Practices necessary to control storm water pollution from construction activities and facility operations, as set forth in the SUSMP applicable to the applicant's project. Structural or Treatment Control BMP's (including, as applicable, post - construction Treatment Control BMP's) set forth in project plans shall meet the design standards set forth in the SUSMP and the current Municipal NPDES Permit. (2) If a Project applicant has included or is required to include Structural or Treatment Control BMP's in project plans, the applicant shall provide verification of maintenance provisions. The verification shall include the applicant's signed statement, as part of its project application, accepting responsibility for all structural and treatment control BMP maintenance until such time, if any, the property is transferred. (3) A new single-family hillside home development or Redevelopment shall include mitigation measures to: (a) Conserve natural areas; (b) Protect slopes and channels; (c) Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage; -9- • (d) Divert roof runoff to vegetated areas before discharge unless the diversion would result in slope instability; and (e) Direct surface flow to vegetated areas before discharge unless the diversion would result in slope instability. (4) Numerical Design Criteria: Post -construction Treatment Control BMPs for all projects must incorporate, at a minimum, either a volumetric or flow based treatment control design standard, or both, as identified below to mitigate (infiltrate, filter or treat) storm water runoff: (a) Volumetric Treatment Control BMP The 85th percentile 24-hour runoff event determined as the maximized capture storm water volume for the area, from the formula recommended in Urban Runoff Quality Management, WEF Manual of Practice No. 23/ ASCE Manual of Practice No. 87, (1998); or ii. The volume of annual runoff based on unit basin storage water quality volume, to achieve 80 percent or more volume treatment by the method recommended in California Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook — Industrial/ Commercial, (1993); or iii. The volume of runoff produced from a 0.75 inch storm event, prior to its discharge to a storm water conveyance system; or iv. The volume of runoff produced from a historical -record based reference 24-hour rainfall criterion for "treatment" (0.75 -inch average for the Los Angeles County area) that achieves approximately the same reduction in pollutant loads achieved by the 85th percentile 24-hour runoff event. (b) Flow Based Treatment Control BMP i. The flow of runoff produced from a rain event equal to at least 0.2 inches per hour intensity; or ii. The flow of runoff produced from a rain event equal to at least two times the 85th percentile hourly rainfall intensity for Los Angeles County; or iii. The flow of runoff produced from a rain event that will result in treatment of the same portion of runoff as treated using volumetric. standards above. -10- (5) • • Applicability of Numerical Design Criteria: The numeric design criteria listed above shall apply to the following categories of projects required to design and implement post -construction treatment controls to mitigate storm water pollution: (a) Single-family hillside residential developments of one (1) acre or more of surface area; (b) Housing developments (including single family homes, multifamily homes, condominiums, and apartments) of ten (10) units or more; (c) A 100,000 square feet or more impervious surface area industrial/ commercial development; after March 10, 2003, one acre or more of impervious surface area industrial/commercial development; (d) Automotive service facilities (SIC 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-7534 and 7536-7539) [5,000 square feet or more of surface area]; (e) Retail gasoline outlets (5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area and with projected Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 100 or more vehicles). [Subsurface Treatment Control BMP's which may endanger public safety (i.e., create an explosive environment) are considered not appropriate]; (f) Restaurants (SIC 5812) [5,000 square feet or more of surface area]; (g) Parking lots 5,000 square feet or more of surface area or with 25 or more parking spaces; (h) Projects located in, adjacent to or discharging directly to an Environmentally Sensitive Area that meet threshold conditions identified above in Section 8(a); and Redevelopment projects in subject categories that meet Redevelopment thresholds. (i) (6) The following categories of Projects which otherwise do not require a SUSMP, but which may potentially have adverse impacts on post -development storm water quality, shall be designed to include post -construction Treatment Controls to mitigate storm water pollution and the implementation of a site-specific plan to mitigate post -development storm water for New Development and Redevelopment where one or more of the following Project characteristics exist: (a) Vehicle or equipment fueling areas; (b) Vehicle or equipment maintenance areas, including washing and repair; (c) Commercial or industrial waste handling or storage; -11- e, y (d) Outdoor handling or storage of hazardous materials; (e) Outdoor manufacturing areas; (f) Outdoor food handling or processing; (g) Outdoor animal care, confinement, or slaughter; or (h) Outdoor horticulture activities. (7) A SUSMP, or site-specific requirements, including post -construction storm water mitigation, shall be required for all Planning Priority Projects (as defined herein) that undergo Significant Redevelopment (as defined herein) in their respective categories. (8) Existing single family structures are exempt. from the Redevelopment requirements set forth in this Chapter." Section 16. Existing Section 8.44.095(C) of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "C. Issuance of Discretionary Permits. No discretionary permit maybe issued for any New Development or Redevelopment Project identified in paragraph A of this Section until the Authorized Enforcement Officer confirms that the project plans comply with the applicable stormwater mitigation plans and enumerated design criteria requirements. Where Redevelopment results in an alteration to more than fifty percent (50%) of impervious surfaces of a previously existing development, and the existing development was not subject to post -development storm water quality control requirements, the entire Project must be mitigated. Where Redevelopment results in an alteration to less than fifty percent (50%) of impervious surfaces of a previously existing development, and the existing development was not subject to post -development storm water quality control requirements, only the alteration must be mitigated, and not the entire development. Existing single family structures are exempt from the redevelopment requirements." Section 17. Section 8.44.100(C) of Title 8, Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to read: "C. Authority to Conduct Samplings and Establishing Sampling Devices. With the consent of the owner or occupant or pursuant to an inspection warrant, any authorized enforcement officer may establish on any property such devices as necessary to conduct sampling and monitoring activities necessary to determining the concentrations of pollutants in stormwater and/or non-stormwater runoff. The inspections provided for herein may include but are not limited to: 1. Inspecting efficiency or adequacy of construction or post construction BMPs; -12- 2. Inspection, sampling and testing any area runoff, soils in areas subject to runoff, and or treatment system discharges; 3. Inspection of the integrity of all storm drain and sanitary sewer systems, including the use of smoke and dye tests and video survey of such pipes and conveyance systems; 4. Inspection of all records of the owner, contractor, developer or occupant of public or private property relating to BMP inspections conducted by the owner, contractor, developer or occupant and obtaining copies of such records as necessary; 5. Identifying points of stormwater discharge from the premises whether surface or subsurface and locating any illicit connection or discharge." Section 18. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, portions, or phrases of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion, or phrase without regard to whether any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion, or phrase of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 19. Declaration of Urgency. This Ordinance is an urgency ordinance for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety and welfare and therefore shall become effective immediately upon its adoption pursuant to Government Code section 36937. This Ordinance must be adopted and must become effective immediately in order to ensure compliance with the storm mitigation measures prescribed in the new Municipal NPDES Permit adopted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in December 2001 as part of the municipal storm water program to address storm water pollution from new development and redevelopment by the private sector. The City is required by the new Municipal NPDES Permit to modify its existing SUSMP ordinances or resolutions by August 1, 2002, to take effect no later than September 2, 2002. Failure to comply with that deadline could jeopardize the City's compliance with the Permit. Accordingly, it is necessary for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare that this Ordinance become effective immediately. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2002 ATTEST: City Clerk -13- MAYOR July 31, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 13, 2002 AB1163 (CALDERON) — SPECIAL LEGISLATION REGARDING WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Recommendation: That the City Council considertaking a support position for AB1163. Background: This bill will direct that the Water Replenishment District follow a process that would include the public in the development and approval of the capital improvement budget for the district. In addition, the bill includes a formula for determining the amount of replenishment water the district may purchase each year. A copy of the bill and the request from the West Basin Water Association is attached. Res. ectfully submitted, I ephen R. Burrell City Manager AB 1163 Assembly Bill - Statu. CURRENT BILL STATUS MEASURE : A.B. No. 1163 AUTHOR(S) Calderon. TOPIC Water Replenishment District of Southern California. HOUSE LOCATION SEN +LAST AMENDED DATE 06/28/2002 TYPE OF BILL : Active Non -Urgency Non -Appropriations Majority Vote Required State -Mandated Local Program. Fiscal Non -Tax Levy LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 07/02/2002 LAST HIST. ACTION In committee: Hearing postponed by committee. COMM. LOCATION SEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT HEARING DATE 08/07/2002 TITLE An act to amend Sections 60233.5 of the Water Code, 'relating to water. Page 1 of 1 http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1163 bill 20020709_status.html 7/31/02 A1! 1163 Assembly Bill - Histo COMPLETE BILL HISTORY BILL NUMBER : A.B. No. 1163 AUTHOR : Calderon TOPIC Water Replenishment District of Southern California. TYPE OF BILL : Active Non -Urgency Non -Appropriations Majority Vote Required State -Mandated Local Program Fiscal Non -Tax Levy Page 1 of 1 BILL HISTORY 2002 July 2 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee. June 28 Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L.GOV. June 27 From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on L.GOV. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 27). June 19 From committee chair, with author's amendments: 'Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on AGR. & WAT. RES. June 17 Joint Rule 61(b)(12) suspended. June.10 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. May 29 Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Coms. on AGR. & WAT. RES. and L.GOV. May 28 Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. May 21 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., C. & I. T. 2001 June 27 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee. May 21 Referred to Coms. on B., C. & I. T. and JUD. May 10 In Senate. Read first time. 'To Com. on RLS. for assignment. May 10 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1520.) May 8 Read second time. To Consent Calendar. May 7 Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading. May 3 Froth committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (May 2). Apr. 17 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 16). Apr. 5 Re-referred to Com. on B. & F. Apr. 3 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended. Apr. 2 Referred to Com. on B. & F. Feb. 26 Read first time. Feb. 25 From printer. May be heard in committee March 27. Feb. 23 Introduced. To print. http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1163 bill 20020702 history.html 7/31/02 • AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 28, 2002 AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 19, 2002 AMENDED IN SENATE MAY 21, 2002 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 7, 2001 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 3, 2001 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE -2001-02 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1163 Introduced by Assembly Member Calderon February 23, 2001 An act to amend Section 60233.5 of the Water Code, relating to water. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1163, as amended, Calderon. Water Replenishment District of Southern California. (1) Existing law, the Water Replenishment District Act, authorizes the formation of water replenishment districts for the replenishment of groundwater within a district. The act requires the State Auditor to perform an audit with regard to the operations and management of the Water Replenishment District of Southern California and to submit a related report to the Legislature. The act provides that these provisions will be repealed on January 1, 2003. This bill would require the State Auditor to submit its report to the Legislature not later than January 30, 2007. The bill would require the cost of the audit to be reimbursed by the district's ratepayers. The 94 AB 1163 —2— • (2) The act prohibits the district from incurring any indebtedness on or after January 1, 2001, authorizes the district to increase its annual water replenishment district assessment under certain circumstances, requires the district to pay for any capital project undertaken by the district with existing reserves or with funds generated from the imposition of water replenishment assessment, and requires the district to consult with a technical advisory committee for certain projects relating to water quality improvement. The This bill would delete these provisions and would instead require the district to establish the amount of groundwater to be replenished in the basins within the boundaries of the district and to develop a 5 -year capital improvement project in accordance with certain requirements, including a requirement that the district and its ratepayers meet and confer in good faith regarding the project, and that the district obtain an advisory vote of the ratepayers regarding the project. The bill would provide that these provisions will be repealed on January 1, 2008. The This bill would impose a state -mandated local program by -extending certain duties of, and imposing new duties on; the district. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement, including the creation of a State Mandates Claims Fund to pay the costs of mandates that do not exceed $1,000,000 statewide and other procedures for claims whose statewide costs exceed $1,000,000. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State -mandated local program: yes. The people of the State' of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the 2 following: 3 (a) The waters of the state are a limited and renewable resource 4 subject to increasing demands. 94 -3— AB 1163 1 (b) Groundwater resources are of critical importance to 2 meeting the water supply needs of the more than 3.5 million people 3 that live and work on the Southern Coastal Plain of Los Angeles 4 County. 5 (c) The Central and West Coast Basins are adjudicated 6 groundwater basins that currently supply almost 40 percent of the 7 water supply used in the area. 8 (d) The Water Replenishment District of Southern California 9 (district) was established in 1959 for the purpose of replenishing 10 the groundwater supplies of the Central and West Coast Basins. 11 (e) The district's ratepayers, which include numerous cities, 12 special districts, and retail water purveyors, have rights and 13 interests in the Central and West Coast Basins. These ratepayers 14 include many cities in western Los Angeles County, including the 15 Cities of Cerritos, Commerce, , Compton, Downey, Hawthorne, 16 Lakewood, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, 17 Montebello, Pico Rivera, Santa Fe Springs, Torrance, and 18 Whittier. These ratepayers are directly accountable to the public 19 and are responsible for providing reliable, cost-effective potable 20 water service to their communities. 21 (f) The State Auditor, in its May 2002 report on the district, 22 found that the district does not have a current strategic plan or 23 capital improvement program that identifies and prioritizes the 24 implementation of its capital improvement projects. 25 (g) Disputes have arisen between the district and its ratepayers 26 regarding the development of a long-range plan for managing the 27 resources of the Central and West Coast Basins, including but not 28 limited to, the components of a capital improvement program to 29 accomplish the statutory purpose of the district. 30 (h) The State Auditor also found that improved 31 communications between the district and its ratepayers is essential 32 to the district's ability to successfully carry out its statutory 33 purpose. 34 (i) The Department of Water Resources serves as watermaster 35 in both the Central and. West Coast Basins and has requested that 36 all interested parties work together in a facilitated process in an 37 effort to develop a mutually agreeable long-range water 38 management plan. 39 (j) It is intent of the Legislature to assist the district's ratepayers 40 in creating a long-term solution to managing the resources of the 94 AB 1163 • • —4- 1 Central and West Coast Basins and to ensure accountability to, and 2 collaboration with, the district's ratepayers. 3 SEC. 2. Section 60233.5 of theWaterCode is amended to 4 read: 5 60233.5. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this 6 division, this section applies to the Water Replenishment District 7 of Southern California. 8 (b) (1) The State Auditor shall perform an audit with regard to 9 the operations and management of the district. 10 (2) The audit shall include an evaluation of the extent to which 11 the district has complied with the recommendations of the report 12 prepared by the State Auditor, dated May 2002, relating to the 13 district. 14 (3) The State Auditor shall prepare and submit to the 15 Legislature, not later than January 30, 2007, a report that includes 16 its findings and recommendations resulting from the audit 17 performed pursuant to this subdivision. 18 (4) The cost for the audit shall be reimbursed by the district's 19 ratepayers. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 groundwater production, in excess of the assumed safe yield of the ba3ins, within the boundaries of the district, calculated as an -average over the three immediately prcccding water years. (c) (1) For the purposes of Section 60221, and subject to paragraph (2), the district shall establish the amount of groundwater to be replenished in the basins within the boundaries of the district to equal the amount of groundwater production, less natural inflows, within the boundaries of the district, calculated as an average over the six immediately preceding water years. (2) (A) In addition, the district may replenish the amount of water necessary to reduce accumulated overdraft, calculated as an average over the six immediately preceding water years, plus up to 5 percent of any overdraft accumulated prior to the six immediately preceding water years. (B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the amount of water that the district may replenish pursuant to subparagraph (A) may not result in an increase in the replenishment assessment of more than 15 percent of the previous year's replenishment assessment. 94 • 1 — 5 — AB 1163 1 (3) Except as provided in paragraphs (1) and (2), this 2 subdivision does not affect Section 60221. 3 (d) The district shall develop a five-year capital improvement 4 project according to all of the following procedures: 5 (1) The district and its ratepayers shall meet and confer in good 6 faith in an effort to reach agreement regarding the project. 7 (2) The district, or any of its ratepayers, may request that a 8 mediator be appointed to assist the parties in developing the 9 project. The mediator shall be selected by an agreement of the 10 district and its ratepayers and the cost of the mediated process shall 11 be shared by both parties. 12 (3) Prior to final approval of the capital improvement project, 13 the district shall obtain an advisory, nonbinding vote of the 14 district's ratepayers regarding whether the project should be 15 adopted as proposed by the district. The vote of each ratepayer 16 shall be weighed in proportion to the total replenishment 17 assessment paid by each ratepayer in the water year preceding the 18 vote. 19 (4) The requirements of this subdivision shall apply to any 20 updates or amendments to any proposed or adopted project and to 21 any capital expenditures subject to Part 8 (commencing with 22 Section 60600). 23 (5) For the purposes of this section, a "ratepayer" is an owner 24 or operator of a water -producing facility upon whom the district 25 levies a replenishment assessment. . 26 (6) Nothing in this section is intended to alter the district's 27 ultimate decisionmaking authority with regard to capital 28 improvement projects. 29 (e) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 30 2008, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, 31 that is enacted before January 1, 2008, deletes or extends that date. 32 SEC. 2. Notwithstanding Section 17610 of the Government 33 Code, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this 34 act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local 35 agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant 36 to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 37 2 of the Government Code. If the statewide cost of the claim for 38 reimbursement does not exce'ed one million dollars ($1,000,000), 94 AB 1163 — 6 — 1 reimbursement shall be made from the State Mandates Claims 2 Fund. 0 94 P August 7, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 13, 2002 BEACH CITIES COMMITTEE — POTENTIAL AREAS WHERE THE CITIES COULD DEVELOP JOINT PROGRAMS TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO RESIDENTS OF ALL PARTICIPATING CITIES Recommendation: That the City Council review the following listing of potential areas where the Beach Cities Committee could consider operating jointly or under contract to the other cities. Background: Council Member Yoon, at the 7/23/02 meeting, discussed the idea that the Beach Cities Committee could become the vehicle for increased cooperation between the cities by jointly operating or contacting with each other for various services. Staff was directed to return with some potential service areas that could be considered at the next Beach Cities Committee meeting. The following is a listing that staff has developed that might be worth considering: • Animal Control enforcement • Animal Control housing • Sewer line maintenance • Traffic signal maintenance contracts • Parks maintenance contracts • Beach and ocean safety • Joint purchasing of supplies • Information System back-up/disaster recovery plans The list can probably cover most services and operations that each of the cities are willing to consider providing in some other fashion either with a single participating city, group of cities, or private contractor. There are a number of joint efforts underway now that seemed to have worked well. The biggest operation is the combined dispatch center with El Segundo. We purchase fuel from Redondo Beach. Several of the cities have the same basic financial software and we have done joint training and share experiences in keeping the systems running. Under an agreement, all 15 South Bay Cities participate in the Area G Disaster Response Program, and this program allows sharing of equipment and personnel in times of disasters. It would seem that this would be a good starting point for a discussion to determine whether or not there is interest from the others to move forward in one or more the service areas listed. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Bu ell City Manager 7b August 7, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council ,/1,3A) Regular Meeting of August 13, 2002 i UPPER PIER AVENUE STREETSCAPE AND TRAVEL LANES i Recommendation: That the City Council review the attached information prepared by IBI, Inc. in 1996 and provide further direction to staff. Background: This issue was discussed at the 7/23/02 meeting. Staff was directed to return with the materials that were developed in 1996 for further City Council review and direction to staff. The concept for upper Pier Avenue from Bard Street to Hermosa Avenue included only two travel lanes, keeps most, if not all, of the parking and provides for wider side sidewalks and a small median strip to allow the landscaping theme to continue the entire length of Pier Avenue. This concept was reviewed and accepted when the City Council reviewed the overall plan for Lower Pier Avenue. No further work was done as the City's effort was spent on Lower Pier Avenue and hotel site and parking structure. If the City Council is interested in pursuing this conceptual plan, staff would suggest a series of meetings and/or workshops to ensure that the conceptual plans will meet the needs of the community. In addition, staff has been directed to begin work on the feasibility of adding parking behind the north side of Pier Avenue between Bard Street and Loma Drive, which would work well with a renovated upper Pier Avenue. The overall effort would also need to include possible funding sources including property owner assessment district, addition of parking meters and possible grants. The City Council would also want to consider this effort in light of others that have been discussed including Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation corridor. If the City Council wishes to proceed with this project, staff should be directed to return with a program that will include the community review, funding, timeline, etc.. Respectfully submitted, / Step en R. Burrell City Manager • • C.UPPER PIER AVENUE Two alternative streetscape concepts were developed for Upper Pier Avenue to the greenbelt, shown on Page I1-25. The preferred alternative, which emerged from a public meeting held on September 21, 1994 shows an expanded sidewalk (to 15') with enhanced planting to soften the streetscape. There is no raised median and one 12' -wide drive lane with an 8' -wide waiting/pull-out lane. A plan and section of a portion of Upper Pier Avenue showing this alternative was developed at 1" = 40' and are shown on Page II -23. Conceptual construction estimates for each of these alternatives are shown on pages II -32 - 11-33 - II -34. Enhancing the existing condition results in a cost of $1,065,540 (D1); expanding the sidewalk to 15' would cost $1,412,242 (D); and retaining the existing 10' -wide sidewalk but adding a 10' -wide median would cost $1,452,460 (D2). Each of these alternatives assumes that the existing sidewalk is removed and replaced with enhanced materials; sidewalk plantings and street furniture are also upgraded (at a minimum) to create a more attractive and pedestrian -friendly streetscape. The main issues discussed at the public meeting sponsored by the Downtown Enhancement Commission were: • Parking • Traffic flow • Sidewalk width • Landscaped medians • Sidewalk landscape improvements The need to maintain parking at existing levels was deemed critical to the future vitality of the area. In addition, it was agreed that, because of the shallowness of the commercial lots, it was essential to widen the existing sidewalk to accommodate outdoor seating and dining. The preferred streetscape concept includes landscape enhancements at. all intersections (popouts) to minimize pedestrian discomfort while crossing this 100' right-of-way. It is anticipated that along with "popout" tree plantings the flood control problems experienced along Upper Pier Avenue will be eliminated. A comprehensive street tree program for this part of Downtown will further reduce the perception that this roadway is too wide and uncomfortable for pedestrians. SUPPLEMENTAL 0. ORMATi(M Hermosa Beach Downtown Implementation Plan—Conceptual Design 7c • IMPLEMENTATION STREET SECTION IMPROVEMENTS: 1. Convert 2 lanes of traffic each way to 1 lane of traffic each way. Transition to be made west of green belt. 2. Widen concrete sidewalks to 15' to allow for dining and pedestrian activity. Integrate cast shell fragments in an informed manner to provide detail continuity with Lower Pier Avenue. LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS: 3. Reduce lane width at greenbelt and add landscaped median of Canary Island palms (See details in Section III, Urban Design Guidelines, Gateways and Focal Points). 4. Create landscape median at both edges of greenbelt and plant a row of Canary Island palms. 5. Reconfigure landscape knuckles and incorporate benches, Canary Island palms and pots with color and shrub plantings (See detail on following page). 6. Plant canopy tree, Ficus microcarpa, along curb edge in 6' tre wells, both sides of Upper Pier Avenue form Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue. 7: 'Install pedestrian post lighting similar to those on Hermosa Avenue, approximately 30' o/c. 8. Replace existing street lights with recommended alternaitve (See Section III, Urban Design Guidelines, Lighting Details). HIGHLIGHTS • Widen sidewalks to 15' • Landscaped median at greenbelt • 1 -way traffic each way • 45° angle parking remains UPPER PIER AVENUE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Implementation Plan—Conceptual Design Page 11-23 AUG -11-02 SUN 22:56 LISSNER-TSDTP; 310 3762287 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET AND MESSAGE Total number of pages including this cover sheet 1 Date; SAT 840-02 Time P-01 To: City Council, City of Hermosa Beach Fax: (310) 372-6186 Voice: (310) 318-0216 From: James Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Fax: (310) 376-2257 Voice: (310) 376-4626 Venue: COUNCIL MEETING OF 8-13-02, MISC. ITEMS CITY MANAGER, #3, PIER AVE. Subject: WHITHER PCB? Conncilrnembers: From City Manager Burrell's staff report for this meeting: "The City Council would also want to consider this effort in light of others that have been discussed including Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation corridor." To wit: From minutes, goal setting session of 1-18-96: "Councilmember Oakes said that Pacific Coast Highway should be one of the Council's priorities and suggested that median strips be considered and that signage and a more attractive presentation be done at the Community Center." "Mayor Bowler said that he would place the creation of a task force for Pacific Coast Highway on the agenda for the next meeting." From minutes, council meeting of 3-26-96: "Action: To receive and file the memorandum containing the Planning Commission's suggested topics for discussion at the joint meeting scheduled for April 30, 1996, at the hour of 7:00 P. M. The topics consist of: _.. 4) overall goals for the City and Pacific Coast Highway development." From minutes, goal setting session of 5-15-97: "Council also asked that a process such as R/UDAT, with an outside facilitator and a great deal of public input be started for the Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation commercial corridor_" From minutes, goal setting session of 34-02: "Goal 16 (set-up of task force to work on Pacific Coast Highway and Aviation Boulevard improvements)... [was] kept on the list." PCII brings in the majority of sales tax to the city coffers. With the new motels, it will bring in the majority of bed tax that is a large part of your budget. Yet PCH has been neglected - the subject "PCH" comes up ever so briefly once a year (see above)_ Compared to working on upper Pier, you have nothing left to lose, and much more to gain - higher motel occupancy, and the flourishing and possible retention of the remaining car dealerships - by working on PCH/Aviation. Why shuffle it to the bottom of the pile year after year, in favor of sexier projects that have little potential to increase city revenue and a great potential to increase expenditures for police and fire services? SUPPLEMENTAL. 7c !%J ORMATION August 8, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 13, 2002 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF BANNER PERMIT FEES FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH WOMAN'S CLUB FOR THE ANNUAL PANCAKE BREAKFAST Recommendation: That the City Council consider waiving the $229 banner fee for the pancake breakfast on October 20, 2002. Background: I have attached a request to waive the banner fee for the pancake breakfast on October 20, 2002. The City Council has waived this fee in this past. Respec „i, y submitted, Step en 7 Burrell City Manager 7d • August 8, 2002 r311•147O.J115LMS CLUB O ERMOS.?t BEACH Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 The Woman's Club of Hermosa Beach is gearing up for its 10th annual Pancake Breakfast on October 20 at the Clark Building. As usual, we have requested a permit to hang a banner at Pier Avenue and Valley Drive for the two weeks prior to the event informing the public of the date. We would appreciate the City Council's consideration of waiving the $229 banner fee for this year's event, which would enable our Club to donate more of its proceeds to our many philanthropies. We appreciate your past support and your consideration of this year's request. Sincerely, Elaine Doerfling, President Woman's Club of Hermosa Beach (310) 374-4932 Post Office Box 43, 3fermosa Beach, California 90254 Mayor and Members of the City Council July 30, 2002 City Council Meeting August 13, 2002 VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS UPCOMING EXPIRATION OF TERMS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council direct the City Clerk to immediately advertise and request applications from interested parties for two Public Works Commission terms that will expire. October 31, 2002, with appointments to be made at the regular Council meeting of October 22, 2002. Background: Two terms on the Public Works Commission will expire October 31, 2002. Following established procedure, this matter is being brought to the attention of Council at this time for direction with regard to advertising the upcoming term expiration. Traditionally, Council has directed that all seats on all boards and commissions be advertised. The seats are currently held by Brian Koch, who has served on the Commission since September 12, 2000, and Victor Winnek, who has served on the Commission since September 26, 2000, when they were appointed to two-year terms on the then newly established commission. If interested in reapplying, both would be eligible for reappointment. Appointment will be for a four-year terms ending October 31, 2006. The vacancy will be advertised with an application -filing deadline of 6 p.m., Wednesday, October 2. I will report back at the meeting of October 8 on the number of submitted applications to enable the Council to schedule adequate time for interviews prior to the October 22 regular meeting. Noted: -�:At r1/ Step ' R. Burrel , qty Manager Elaine Doerfling, City Cl ONE. PARCEL 4,600 S.F. SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL VAP NO. 26299 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 134, OF WALTER RANSOM CO'S VENABLE PLACE, AS PER MAPS RECORDED IN BOOK 9, PAGE 150 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE. SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. bvth RO6ERT CAMPBELL SUBDIVIDER RECORD OWNER: ROBERT CAMPBELL THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 2 UNITS WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ON .. E _5r 2oOZ SS. PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, CLI LL .&M.A14.6.0 A NOTARY Rom � T I ? g5E LL N.O. 11284 EXP. 12-31•-04 PERSONALLY KNOWN. TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED. THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED 'CAPACITY(IES) AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. NOTARY PUBIC IN AND FOR SAID ,STATE NAME: CLHERNI.. A. vit_klEo MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1.A.:05 EASEMENT OF WARREN GILLELEN, FOR WATER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617, PAGE 47 OF DEEDS. SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. I RKRER /!RTX THAT SECURITY IN THE AMOUNT OF: $ r 7 ! .� HAS SEEN FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AS SECURITYFOR THE PAYMENT OF TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES ON THE LANDVOWN "IN MAP OF. TRACT . NO /PARCEL MAP NO. CO y AS REQUIRED BY LAW. EXECUTIVE OFFICER -CLERK OF THE BOARD OF' SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, , TATE OF'C A IFORNIA Ad. by DEPUTY 7� e -aL. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL CERTIFICATES HAVE BEL PILED AND DEPOSITS HAVE BEEN MADE THAT ARE REQUIRED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 6649k AND 66493 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT . EXECUTIVE OFFICER -CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELESOFA BY 0.0 -/S7 (1/i / -23') DEPUTY J U L 3 0.2002 COM. DEV DEPT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT ' THIS MAP' WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF ROBERT CAMPBELL . ON 01-28-02 I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR' CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. EDWARD G. SHWEIRI R.C.E. 11284 EXPIRATION: 12-31-04 RECORD DATA WAS TAKEN FROM WALTER RANSOM CO'S VENABLE PLACE, M.B. 9-150. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF' HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN 'PAID IN FULL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION . ORDINANCES. OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED • WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. JAMES A. NOYES CITY, NGINEER• DEPUTY R.C.E. 4`20&.73 COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE 2oo22. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP, THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP: AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY 'CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER COUNTY ENGINEER BY DEPUTY DATE RCE NO. EXPIRES' CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE DAY OF , 20__ APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 200 SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE. SCALE: 1" =20' SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL VAP \O. 26299 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES a INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP. W'LY LINE OF LOT 134 PER * AND E1LY LINE OF '. 0 N SLY LINE OF LOT 130 PER * N 76°34'00"E 40.00 0 0 co N TY) z 1 4,600 S.F. 41 cD N 0 z N♦76°34'00" E 40.0=' * WALTER RANSOM CO'S VENABLE PLACE M. B. 9-150 SEM .TRACT NO. 46903 M. B. 1168-35-36 W'LY LINE OF LOT 135 PER * FDL&TPER** ON C/L PROD .0, �•. ONE PARCEL 3,060 S.F. SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL VAPNO0 26290 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 106 SHAKESPEARE, AS pEz r'A R GUIZDD g 2I' PAGE 190 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. igabe 1 ] CAMPBELL 1 SUBDIVIDER RECORD OWNER: WILLIAM CAMPBELL THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 2 UNITS WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ON -UN E 5+.2QQZ.- BEFORE ME, Gi}ERkl A. Yetitzkin, A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED [iiME.OT C_Akt fezteLL QQOF E S S l O4f �Q G. SyW Lij c� No. 11284 ui EXP. 12-31-04 PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES) AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURES) ON THE INSTRUMENT. THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. NOTARY PUBkI FOR SAID S4A'TE IN AND NAME: •aHL is...vAR1Lrli MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS. IS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1-18-05 HERRM CERTIFY THAT SECURITY IN THE AMOUNT OF 32. 00 HAS BEEN PILED WITH THE OLERX OF T BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF t•OS ANGELES AS SECURITY FOR THE PAYMENT OF TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES ON THE LAND 11}1_, ON MAP OF TRACT NO. /PARCEL MAP NO. 62-9p _ AS REQUIRED BY LAW. EXECUTIVE OFFICER -CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE 'COUNTY OF LOS ANG , STATE OF CALIFORNI BY G AALIA-0-) DEPUTY 7//G/O 1 IigNEB.Y CERTIFY THAT ALL CERTIFICATES HAVE BEEtl WILED AND -DEPOSITS HAVE BEEN. MADE THAT ARE • REQUIREDUNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 66492 AND 68493 OF THE,SUBDIVIS ION MAP ACT. EXECUTIVE OFFICER -CLERK OF THE BOARD. .OF SUPERVISORS' OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGEL , ;STATE OF CALIFORN A • TWPTTTY o54-IS1 (4181-/D) 7%6/17 f COS, c'1* 17,. 9, CIVIL OF CAL IFO W 0.5W Hoo_ 0 No.020273 .Exp, 9.30• AWED JUL 3 0 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF CAMPBELL ON 01-29-02 I HEREBY STATE . THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. EDWARD G. SHWEIRI R.C.E. 1 1284 EXPIRATION: 12-31-04 RECORD DATA WAS TAKEN FROM SHAKESPEARE, M.B. 9-190. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF, THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF. IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. JAMES A. NOYES. CITY ENGINEER (1 -Nr -2). 1 / DEPUTY Q R.C.E. 02 0273 EXPIRES - jO—Ot DATE COUNTY ENGINEER'S. CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP, THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER COUNTY ENGINEER BY DEPUTY DATE RCE NO. EXPIRES CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION. ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE DAY OF 20__ APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 200_ SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE SCALE: 1" =2O' SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL VAP \O. 26290 BLOCK 106 SHAKESPEARE M.B. 9-190 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES FD WELL MON PER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH F.B. 36 70' 70' 0 30TH STREET 9 0' 20' 111 N Z 9 0' 20' FD WELL MON PER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH F.B. 36 0 N" N 65°07'00"E N 65°07'00"E 85.00' a INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP i a rir • • i A= 3,060 SO FT a a I N 65°07'00"E 85.00' N'LY LINE. OF LOT 2 N 65°07'00"E W 8 1 50f m 7.5 7.5' I� 3 -J 8 Q ci. N 7.5 5' 7.5' 29TH STREET I PARCEL 2,850 S.F. PARCEL VAP..\O.02.663 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 10, BLOCK 8 OF HERMOSA BEACH AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK I PAGES 25 AND 26 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT 1 HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. A ROBERT A. NEWSOME SUBDIVIDER RECORD OWNER: ROBERT A. NEWSOME & DIANE E. NEWSOME TRUSTEES OF THE NEWSOME TRUST THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 2 UNITS WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ON % ' ""I : � "*''' , BEFORE ME, {,', FP.:1 t. . vik e. f: ti^, . A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE .SAME IN. HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(ITES) AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. NOTARY PUpLJ'C IN AND FOR SAID 'STATE NAME: CA -I Ct`v 9_. A . MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES gm/Ito/14oC.a'stAk2A---) 7-ZL-°Z EASEMENT OF WARREN GILLELEN, FOR WATER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617, PAGE 47 OF DEEDS. SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. 05¢-/57 atAmovuda 4167.- /5 Lo w cc 0“. s s J o, G . S/-r�\ �,P No. 11284 EXP. I2-31-00 C/ VI CAL IF Q 1m m SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS RECEIVED JUL 25 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE .REQUEST OF ROBERT NEWSOME ON 02- 18-00 I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. EDWARD G. SHWEIRI R.C.E. 11284 EXPIRATION: 12-3I -00 RECORD DATA WAS TAKEN FROM HERMOSA BEACH, M.B. I -25-26 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT .IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA ,BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME. OF AP_ PROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. JAMES A. NOYES CITY ENGINEER DEPUTY R.C.E. 020273 pv•-sc) Z�22�o Z EXPIRES 9-30-05 COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP, THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER COUNTY ENGINEER BY DEPUTY DATE RCE NO. EXPIRES CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE DAY OF , 20 APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 20 SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE SCALE: I 2O SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL VAP \O. 25665 * BLOCK 8 HERMOSA BEACH TRACT. M.B. 1-25-26 * PM NO. 18804 P.M.B. 204-77 FD LB&T (NO REF.) IN LIEU OF SPK PER ** IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES Q s d INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP 0 M 8TH STREET 0 N 77°30'00"E N 77°30'OO"E 30.00' FD L8T LS 4142 ACCEPTED AS POINT ON Cit 0 E'LY LINE OF LOT 9 0 N r r 4 '8 u) a) 33p A= Z,850 SQ FT O O 0 N z a 0 0 N N 77°30'00"E 30.00' N 77°30'00"E 8TH COURT 0 N 0 W'LY LINE OF LOT I I w z W Q 0 W SCALE: 1"=30' 1 PARCEL 4,600 SQ. F. PAS EL v AP 0. 26057 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH , COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 116, WALTER RANSOM CO'S VENABLE PLACE AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 9 PAGE 150 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES PIAT ENGINEERING INC. SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT: I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. MICHAEL :.,TUMANJAN, (SUBDIVI STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS. COUNTY OF LOS ANGEL S ON THIS lkiA DAY OF 2002 , BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, PERSONALLY APPEARED MICHAEL TUMANJAN, PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON 45 WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS AUTHORIZED CAPACITY, AND THAT. BY HIS SIGNATURE ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON, OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. NOTARY PUBLIC— E o zaV)e A k (` C ry PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES — -'� • �Z. CONDOMINIUM NOTE: THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR TWO UNITS, WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. RECORD OWNER: 709 FIRST PLACE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION EASEMENT NOTE: WARREN GILLELEN, SUCCESSOR OR ASSIGNS, EASEMENT HOLDER FOR WATER PIPE PURPOSES PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617 PAGE 47 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. LEGEND a a a INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP * WALTER RANSOM CO'S VENABLE PLACE M.B. 9-150. FD. L&T PER P.M. No. 18414, P.M.B. 203-42. 2ND STREETS -1/ N76'34'00'E S'LY LINE OF LOT 99, * _-! 40.00' 0 0 0 i N76'34'00'E i r 4,600 SQ. FT. • 0 0 Lei 0 (p 0 r � N7S'34'00 E 40.00' a -�-ti-� N76° 3 4-: o o` E. 054-157 (4188-22) 0 FIRST PLACE 0 N FD. L&T PER P.M. I No. 18414, P.M.B. 203-42. SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET JUL 30 2002 COM. DEV. DEPT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF MICHAEL TUMANJAN IN FEBRUARY, 2002. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. VICTOR J. AI, R.C.E. 20327 EXPIRES: O,I '-30-05 RECORD DATA NOTE: RECORD DATA IS FROM WALTER RANSOM CO.'S VENABLE PLACE, M.B 9-150. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. DATE: -11211 [©v JAMES A. NOYES CITY ENGINEONA-& DEPUTY: R.C.E. No. 02'0/ 73 EXPIRES: 9 -30 •�,s SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE.: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF 1S SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. DATE: CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE:: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE DAY OF 2001, APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. DATE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF 2000. DATE SECRETARY OF PLANNING COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE.: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP, THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER. COUNTY ENGINEER DATE: BY: DEPUTY R. C. E. No. EXPIRES: $ QsO, vG RAS 6.CEN FILE'" • �u E.:... TERITTI ORS OF TAR LOS ANG.411;. 5 , . t7 7 - s ,: r ava PAY -54T OF TA ES as 1t?,.:.4 1 . 1. r: L. A _ n � .. i; P9 .:.1; , � r, L � a 26 7 J.etitre,.Axxaj, 7-29-0 2 --i(A-Ar4 7-z9-'2