Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02/10/04
• AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 10, 2004, 6:00 p.m. - Council Chambers, City Hall 1315 Valley Drive MAYOR CITY CLERK Michael Keegan Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Art Yoon John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Sam Y. Edgerton Stephen R. Burrell - J. R. Reviczky CITY ATTORNEY Peter Tucker Michael Jenkins CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INTERVIEW APPLICANTS FOR: 1 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONS ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA PACKET FOR FEBRUARY 10, 2004 UNDER ITEM 8a APPOINTMENTS WILL BE MADE AT THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING THAT FOLLOWS THIS INTERVIEW MEETING. ADJOURNMENT 1 • • "Love is the master key that opens the gates of happiness." - Oliver Wendell Holmes AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - Council Chambers, City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK Michael Keegan Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Art Yoon John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Sam Y. Edgerton Stephen R. Burrell J. R. Reviczky CITY ATTORNEY Peter Tucker Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer. City Council agendas and staff reports are available for your review on the City's web site located at www.hermosabch.org CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2004: NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda as a business item. 1 xua'IJ ALD 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction, or to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar, may do so at this time. Comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Comments from the public are limited to three minutes per speaker. Members of the audience may also speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; and, 3) during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. The City Council acknowledges receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in written communications. The Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. a. Letter from Jennifer Alvarado, President Emeritus of the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation, regarding the "Surfin' Hermosa 2004" Art Project. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 4, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve the minutes of the Regular meeting held on January 13, 2004. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the December 2003 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to adopt a resolution acknowledging the receipt, filing and approval of the annual statement of investment policy and delegating investment authority to the City Treasurer for the year 2004. Memorandum from City Treasurer John Workman dated January 29, 2004. (h) (i) ()) Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of January 21, 2004. Recommendation to reject the only bid received for the City Hall Handrail Project No. 007-04 and authorize staff to re -advertise for bids. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated February 3, 2004. Recommendation to authorize the purchase of forty-eight (48) STI .45 caliber handguns from Shooters Connection Inc. of Middletown, Kentucky in the amount of $67,638 (includes tax and shipping) and appropriate $17,638 from the Citizens Option for Public Safety (COPS) fund. Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin dated January 29, 2004. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving_a pre-tax payroll deduction plan for service credit purchases. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 4, 2004. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving final map #26262 for a 3 -unit condo at 300 Hermosa Avenue. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 3, 2004. (k) Recommendation to receive and file a report of Customer Service Surveys/Complaints. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated February 4, 2004. (I) Recommendation to deny the following claim and refer them it the City's Liability Claims Administrator. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated February 4, 2004. Claimant: Roberts, Cecil; Roberts, Grace; Roberts, Cecil Jr.; Hur, Marvin; Hur, Connie Date of Loss: 09-20-03 Date Filed: 01-22-04 (m) Recommendation to approve Personnel Complaint Form. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated February 5, 2004. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consgnt Calendar. 3 • • 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. a. HISTORIC RESOURCE NOMINATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 100 THE STRAND AND AUTHORIZATION TO STUDY PROPERTY FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 3, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. b. DETERMINATION OF WHETHER OR NOT THE PROPERTY AT 24 EIGHTH STREET CONSTITUTES A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND CONSIDERATION OF NUISANCE ABATEMENT. (Continued from meeting ofJanuary 13, 2004. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 2, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. c. TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING LIMITATIONS OF OPEN SPACE COVERAGE FOR TRELLIS STRUCTURE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 10, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: Continue the subject hearing until the February 24, 2004 meeting. d. TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING STATE MANDATED DENSITY BONUS ORDINANCE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 4, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: Waive full reading and introduce ordinance amending Chapter 17.42 of the Zoning Ordinance (General Provisions, Conditions and Exceptional Uses), adding provisions for residential density bonuses. e. TEXT AMENDMENT TO CLARIFY THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN RESTAURANTS AND SNACK SHOPS. (Continued from meeting of -January 13, 2004) Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated January 20, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: Amend the snack shop definition by waiver of full reading and introduction of ordinance. 4 • • 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. MID YEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated January 28, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, budget transfers and fund balances as shown in the Budget Summary and Revenue Worksheet; approve a change to the year-end transfer of unspent funds to allocate amounts to the Compensated Absences Fund, the Capital Improvement Fund, the Insurance Fund and to a new Retirement Stabilization Fund; and, transfer any funds in excess of our goal in the Contingency Fund to the new Retirement Fund. . b. REPORT ON THE STRAND BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin dated February 2, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file report and enact any of the proposed recommendations in the report. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. SB744 — CONSIDERATION OF TAKING A POSITION OF OPPOSITION ON THIS PROPOSED LEGISLATION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated February 3, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: Take a position of opposition and direct that a letter be sent to the author and the City's state representatives and that staff track the bill. b. REQUEST TO REVIEW THE BANNER PROGRAM. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. VACANCIES — BOARDS & COMMISSIONS — APPOINTMENT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO FILL UNEXPIRED TERM DUE TO UNSCHEDULED VACANCY, Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated February 4, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: Appoint from among the applicants interviewed earlier this evening to fill an unexpired term ending June 30, 2004. 5 • • 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. NONE ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on January 27, 2004. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Employee Organizations: Stephen Burrell Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association Police Management Bargaining Group 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager 4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 a. Property: Two contiguous parcels fronting 2"d and 3rd Streets, APN 4188-028-070 & 073 Negotiating Parties: Stephen Burrell and Crosswind Capital, Inc. Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION • ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT 6 • EDUCATION FOUNDATION P.O. Box 864 Hermosa Beach California 90254 310.372.1785 www.HBEF.com tax i.d. #33-0522270 • January 20, 2004 Mr. Steve Burrell City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Califomia 90254 Re: Surfin' Hermosa Art Project Dear Mr. Burrell: 1 respectfully request you place this letter on the city council's agenda as written communication at the February 10, 2004 meeting, if possible. In honor of the proud tradition of the great sport of surfmg, and in celebration of the emerging status of Hermosa Beach as the art center of the South Bay, the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation and the Hermosa Arts Foundation plan to host the spectacular "SURFIN' HERMOSA 2004" project. The goal of the project is to decorate Hermosa Beach by hanging twenty originally painted surfboards throughout the downtown area. Local artists will donate their talents and use high concept art to create original designs. The use of full-size surfboards will pay homage to the historical significance of the surfing community in Hermosa Beach. These one -of -a -kind works of art will be on public display around the city for two months. The surfboards will then be auctioned and all monies raised will be donated to the non-profit organizations of the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation, which raises funds for Hermosa Beach Public Schools, and the Hermosa Arts Foundation, which raises funds for the Hermosa Beach Community Center and programs. In Chicago, "Cows On Parade," a similar event, attracted media coverage and thousands of visitors from around the world. Limited only by their imaginations, the artists decorated fiberglass cows dressed in tuxedos, depicting movies, local businesses or fairy tales, showing scenes of downtown Chicago, and a tourist cow wearing sunglasses; there was even a cow that jumped over the moon. To quote Richard M. Daley, Mayor of Chicago, " Our "Cows On Parade" demonstrate that art does not have to be either "serious" or "hands off"for it to be effective and moving." Businesses in downtown Chicago experienced a significant increase in revenue as a result of the visitor traffic generated by the "Cows on Parade" project. What better way to honor Hermosa Beach and invigorate our local economy than by celebrating the traditions that have made it a great community in which to live and work? We want you to join us for the most visual event of the year, "SURFIN'HERMOSA 2004,"and help us "hang twenty" in Hermosa Beach. I look forward to hearing from you. Please contact me at (310) 372-1785 with any questions you may have regarding the project. Very truly yours, HERMOSA B ATION FOUNDATION e iferA P sident 0 us la • Zr ey/o/d/ SURFIN' HERMOSA 2004 PRESENTED BY THE HERMOSA BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION Et THE HERMOSA ARTS FOUNDATION MISSION STATEMENT In honor of the proud tradition of the great sport of surfing in Hermosa Beach and as a celebration of the City's emerging status as an art center, the HBEF and HAF will host the spectacular event of SURFIN' HERMOSA 2004. Hermosa Beach will be decorated by hanging twenty ORIGINALLY PAINTED SURFBOARDS throughout the downtown area. Local artists will donate their talents and use high concept art to create original designs. The use of full-size surfboards will pay homage to the historical significance of the surfing community in Hermosa Beach. These one -of -a -kind works of art will be on public display around the City for two months. The surfboards will then be auctioned and all monies raised will be donated to the non profit organizations of HBEF which raises funds for Hermosa Beach Public Schools and HAF which raises funds for the Hermosa Beach Community Center and programs. In Chicago "Cows On Parade" was a similar event which attracted media coverage and thousands of visitors from around the world. Limited only by their imaginations, the artists produced fiberglass cows dressed in tuxedos, depicting movies, scenes of downtown Chicago, businesses, and local events; there was even a cow that jumped over the moon. Richard M. Daley, Mayor of Chicago was quoted as saying, " Our "Cows On Parade" demonstrate that art does not have to be either "serious" or "hands off" for it to be effective and moving." Various Sponsor Packages for SURFIN' HERMOSA 2004 will be available: from TITLE SPONSOR, which will appear in the event's title and on all advertising materials, to a ONE BOARD SPONSOR, where a painted surfboard will be named after an individual or a company. What better way to honor Hermosa Beach as a wonderful community in which to work, rest and play? Come join us for the high profile event of the year SURFIN'HERMOSA 2004 and help us hang twenty in Hermosa Beach. ,[P I lermosa Ikach Education Foundation & the Hermosa Ans Foundation I4 • • o//ploy MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, January 13, 2004, at the hour of 7:21 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Maggie Moir ROLL CALL: Present: Edgerton, Reviczky, Tucker, Yoon, Mayor Keegan Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS — Councilmember Tucker announced that the Planning Commission would conduct a General Plan Workshop on Thursday, January 22 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers and urged all citizens to attend to provide input. Councilmember Edgerton announced a Household Hazardous Waste Roundup on Saturday, January 24, at Clark Field on Valley Drive in front of the tennis courts, at which paint and other hazardous waste would be collected, as well as computer, TV, and other electronic components. Mayor pro Tempore Yoon congratulated Hermosa Beach figure skater Amber Corwin on her fourth place win last weekend at the United States figure skating championship competition in Atlanta, with the top three winners going to the Olympics. Councilmember Reviczky thanked all the residents of Manhattan Beach and Hermosa Beach for their generous donations to the 2003 Beach Cities Toy Drive, said the toys were distributed to numerous charitable organizations, and read a letter of appreciation from the Good Shepherd Shelter, one of the recipient groups. Mayor Keegan said that a good time was had by all ringing in the New Year Hermosa style at the New Year's Eve celebration on Pier Plaza. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Lisa Ryder Moore, on behalf of the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation, presented a photo collage of the businesses at the Ralph's' shopping center to Roger Bacon with an expression of appreciation for his raising $85,000 for the schools in the last three years though his administration of the banner program. Roger Bacon thanked the Foundation and also thanked the City for allowing the Banner Program. City Clerk Doerfling added that Roger does a lot for the community, including helping to raise funds for the Sister City Association to pay for a series of surgeries and other medical treatments for former Loreto exchange student Miriam Murillo. City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11312 2a • • CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF DECEMBER 9, 2003: NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS There were no written communications. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Blair Smith — Hermosa Beach, owner of a duplex on Myrtle Avenue, which the City was resurfacing; cited a problem with water collecting on the east _ side; said he asked Public Works to install a curb and gutter which most of the residents on the street (12 out of 16) had agreed to pay for, at $1,300 per property; asked if the City would pay the balance not covered by the other four property owners (City Manager Burrell was directed by the Council to work with the residents to see if this could be accomplished before work on the street was completed); Suzanne Rampay — Hermosa Beach, thanked the Council for consideration of her communications to them regarding her opposition to Segways on the Strand (agenda item 6g); said they may have been appropriate on a separate bike path but not on the current Strand; Alan Dillenbach — Redondo Beach, representing the South Bay Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation, discussed the memo he presented to the Council supporting the Segway devices; Jeff Duclos — Hermosa Beach, opposed allowing Segways on the Strand; said the conclusions drawn by Police Chief Lavin (agenda item 6c) had been reached without adequate analysis, consultation with experts, or public input; disagreed that the speed limit signs on the Strand should be removed; said the study months of October and December did not represent the peak months of Strand usage; urged the Council to direct stronger enforcement, citing success with this approach in San Diego; Jack Janken — Hermosa Beach, concurred with the previous speaker; disagreed with the distribution of his application to the Board of Appeals through Community Development Director Blumenfeld; said Council mandates were not being followed; said discussion of a new complaint form was supposed to be on tonight's agenda (City Manager Burrell said discussion of the form would be on the next agenda, and the Board of Appeals agenda packet would be distributed to its members a week before the meeting on January 26); Maria Flannigan — Hermosa Beach, Co -Chair of Hermosa Beach Education Foundation, requested that fees be waived for the banner for the spring fundraiser (City Manager Burrell said that could be handled at the administrative level); Maggie Moir — Hermosa Beach, announced the opening of a new play at the Hermosa Playhouse on January 31 called "The Crane Daughter," a City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11313 • • beautiful Japanese fairy tale; thanked the Council for their continued support of the Last Saturday Puppet Theater, now in its third year; was grateful for the possibility of wireless Internet which would help many seniors like herself on a fixed income; and Joanne Edgerton — Hermosa Beach, said continuation of the banner program was very important for Hermosa children; thanked the Council and staff for arranging a meeting with CalTrans to regain the location at Pacific Coast Highway, noting that the funds raised for the schools by the banner program were very much needed. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (m), with the exception of the following items, which were removed for discussion in item 4, but are shown in order for clarity: (h) Reviczky, (j) Tucker, and (I) Keegan. Motion Reviczky, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 7:53 p.m., the order of the agenda was suspended to go to public hearing items 5(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Regular meeting held on November 25, 2003; and 2) Regular meeting held on December 9, 2003. Action: To approve as presented the minutes of the regular meetings of the City Council held on November 25, 2003 and December 9, 2003. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY CHECK REGISTER NOS. 35087 THROUGH 35373 AND TO APPROVE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NO. 35163 AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE NOVEMBER 2003 FINANCIAL REPORTS: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) Cityjreasurer's report; and 3) Investment report. City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11314 Action: To receive and file the November 2003 financial reports, as recommended by staff. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS AND REFER BOTH OF THEM TO THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl. Claimant: Prada, Claudia Date of Loss: 08-29-03 Date Filed: 12-17-03 Claimant: Briley, Christopher; Thomas, Justin; Agner, Kenneth Date of Loss: 07-04-03 Date Filed: 12-09-03 Action: Deny the subject claims and refer them to the City's Liability Claims Administrator, as recommended by staff. (0 RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 2003. (9) Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of November 19, 2003. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE PROJECT STATUS REPORT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan. Action: To receive and file the status report of capital improvement projects that are either under design or constructions, as recommended by staff. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT DONATIONS OF $100 FROM ELAINE DOERFLING TO BE USED FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE VETERANS' MEMORIAL AND $2,215 FROM ROCKLAND FINANCIAL TO BE USED FOR A MEMORIAL BENCH FOR STEVE FISHMAN TO BE LOCATED IN VALLEY PARK. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated January 5, 2004. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting in order to acknowledge and thank the donors. Action: To accept the following donations received by the City: -$ 100 Elaine Doerfling for maintenance of Veterans' Memorial; -$2,215 Rockland Financial for a Memorial bench for Steve Fishman to be located in Valley Park City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11315 (i) Motion Councilmember Reviczky second Yoon. The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton, who left at 12:04 a.m. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS. RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 2. 2003. Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources meeting of December 2, 2003. (j) RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO ALLIANCE STREETWORKS, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 02-185 STREET IMPROVEMENTS — FIFTH STREET FROM ARDMORE AVENUE TO PROSPECT AVENUE, BASED UPON THEIR LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BID OF $176,969.00; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEYQ AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES AS NECESSARY WITHIN THE CONTINGENCY OF $9,000; AND APPROVE THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND DAVID MOMENT, PHD, FOR A FEE NOT TO EXCEED $24,000 AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated January 6, 2004. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Tucker for separate discussion later in the meeting Public Works Director Morgan responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Award the Construction Contract to Alliance Streetworks, Anaheim California, based upon their lowest responsible bid of $176,969; (2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the construction contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; (3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within the contingency of $9,000; and (4) Approve the attached Professional Services Agreement for construction inspection services between the City of Hermosa Beach and David Momeni, PhD, for a fee not to exceed $17,700 and authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest subject to approval by the City Attorney. Motion Keegan, second Yoon. The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton, who left at 12:04 a.m. City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11316 • • (k) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRACT AMOUNT PAID TO THE CITY'S LANDSCAPING CONTRACTOR, US LANDSCAPES, INC. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated January 6, 2004. (1) (m) Action: To approve an increase of $20,5000 (included in the 2003-2004 budget) in the contract amount paid to the City's landscaping contractor, US Landscapes, Inc., as recommended by staff. RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH PIMA CORPORATION TO INCLUDE PREVIOUSLY DELETED INTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON PIER AVENUE FROM THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $53,000; APPROPRIATE $125,559 FROM THE CDBG FUND TO PROVIDE NECESSARY FUNDING TO COVER THE COST OF ADDED ITEMS, CONSULTANT FEES AND TO PROVIDE A 20% CONTINGENCY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH PIMA CORPORATION; AND, AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO ISSUE CHANGE ORDERS AS NECESSARY WITHIN THE APPROVED BUDGET. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated January 6, 2004. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Keegan for separate discussion later in the meeting Public Works Director Morgan responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Amend the construction contract with Pima Corporation to include previously deleted interior improvements and street improvements on Pier Avenue from the original contract in the amount of $53,000; (2) Appropriate $125,559 from the CDBG Fund to provide necessary funding to cover the cost of added items, consultant fees and to provide a 20% contingency for the construction contract with Pima Corporation; and (3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue change orders as necessary within the approved budget. Motion Mayor Keegan, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton, who left at 12:04 a.m. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE STATUS REPORT ON THE BEACH DRIVE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; APPROVE APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,000 TO BE CONSISTENT WITH CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE CONTRACT FOR ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING; APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11317 • • NORTHCROSS, HILL & ACH IN THE AMOUNT OF $5000 TO ASSIST THE CITY IN A PRIVATE BOND PLACEMENT SHOULD THE DISTRICT PROCEED. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated January 8, 2004. City Manager Burrell said the correct assessment engineering cost was $16,000 (not $15,000 as erroneously shown in the report). Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Receive this status report on the subject of underground district. (2) Approve appropriation in the amount of $16,000 to be consistent with City Council approval of the contract for Assessment Engineers. (3) Approve agreement with Financial Advisor in the amount of $5,000 to assist the City in a private bond placement should the district proceed. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 04-1235 — "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING A NEW SUB -SECTION TO CHAPTER 17.40 TO PROVIDE STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED MIXED-USE PROJECTS IN THE C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE. For adoption. Introduced on December 9, 2003. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated December 24, 2003. Supplemental revised ordinance from Community Development Director Blumenfeld received January 13, 2004. Action: To waive full reading and re -introduce Ordinance No. 04-1235, as revised, with an additional amendment to Section 4, item 7 of the ordinance requiring the owner to provide a separate written disclosure, upon the sale or rental of the property, that the property is mixed use. Motion Reviczky, second Mayor Keegan. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote by Yoon and the absence of Edgerton, who left at 12:04 a.m. 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 2(h), (j), and (I) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown in order for clarity. At 12:10 a.m., the order of the agenda returned to item 3(a) Consent Ordinance. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION, ON OCTOBER 21, 2003, DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A GREATER THAN 250 City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11318 • • SQUARE FOOT ADDITION ON A PROPERTY CONTAINING THREE UNITS WITH LESS THAN TWO PARKING SPACES PER UNIT AT 1427 MONTEREY BOULEVARD. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld. Councilmember Tucker recused himself and left the dais because he had heard the item as a Planning Commissioner. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:20 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Bill Febbo — applicant, said he was improving his property, providing more parking, and not taking away anyone's view, said the property was unique and there should not be many requests like his, noting that similar requests should also be granted, that if approving his project set a precedent, maybe it would be a good precedent. The public hearing closed at 8:30 p.m. Proposed Action: To overturn the Planning Commission's denial and approve the variance based on Council's ability to make the required findings with the condition that the applicant provides a survey of the property. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion failed, noting the dissenting votes of Yoon and Mayor Keegan, and the absence of Tucker. The above motion did not carry due to a tie vote of 2-2 and, therefore, the Planning Commission Resolution No. 03-63 stands. Action: To direct staff to report back at a future meeting on the issue of providing an exception to the 250 -square -foot remodel rule that would allow residents to remodel their legal, nonconforming buildings without the need for a variance if they are increasing parking, and in order to preserve classic structures, with the understanding that if the City Council decided to pursue such an exception, the matter would be referred to the Planning Commission for consideration of a Code amendment at a public hearing and with a recommendation back to Council. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Keegan. The motion carried, noting the absence of Tucker. b. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION, ON OCTOBER 21, 2003, TO DENY A VARIANCE TO LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENT IN ORDER TO ALLOW AN ADDITION AND REMOVAL AND CONVERSION OF A DUPLEX TO A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING, RESULTING IN 71% City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11319 • • LOT COVERAGE RATHER THAN THE MAXIMUM 65% AT 259 31ST STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld. Councilmember Tucker was not present on the dais, having recused himself from this public hearing and the previous one because he had heard the items as a Planning Commissioner. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:59 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Larry Peha — Hermosa Beach, project architect, said his clients wanted to convert a duplex into a single-family residence and were told they had 58 square feet available to build on and still comply with the Code, which was the exact size of the proposed bathroom; said later when the lot coverage problem came to light, the only solution offered by the City was to move the exterior stairs inside the home, which was not feasible; said the proposed project would improve density and parking because there would be only one dwelling unit; Jonathan Schwartz — applicant, said when the bay window was installed in 1997, they entered into a recorded boundary line agreement with the adjacent property owner that runs with the land; said there was precedent since at least three properties on the street had variances granted for the same thing; and Stacy Schwartz — applicant, said exceptional circumstances included the small lot and narrow alley; said the improvements would fit into the current footprint and the 1936 architectural features gave the home character that they wished to maintain; said the proposed project was necessary to preserve their property rights since they were merely adding another bedroom and bathroom which would make the home a reasonable size; said they sought their neighbor's input by holding an open house and presenting their plans and had neighborhood support since a single-family residence was preferable to a duplex; that they would be reducing noise, density, and parking problems. The public hearing closed at 9:10 p.m. Action: To overturn the Planning Commission's denial and approve the appeal, thereby approving the variance, and to direct staff to prepare a resolution reflecting the Council's action this evening, along with the findings, for adoption at the next meeting. Motion Edgerton, second Yoon. The motion carried, noting the absence of Councilmember Tucker. City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11320 • The meeting recessed at 9:24 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:42 p.m., with all members present. c. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO HOLD FIESTAS HERMOSA ON MEMORIAL DAY (MAY 29, 30 & 31, 2004) AND LABOR DAY (SEPTEMBER 4. 5. AND 6, 20042 AND CONSIDERATION OF A MULTI-YEAR AGREEMENT. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated January 6, 2004. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions, explaining that this agreement provided the framework for the required event permits. The public hearing opened at 9:50 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Conn Flatlet/ — Board of Directors, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and Visitor's Bureau, said the Chamber received no City funds and the Fiestas help local businesses with 120,000 people visiting on each 3 - day weekend; said 2003 profits funded the Visitors' Bureau marketing plan, and $40,000 of those profits funded the Hermosa Beach Tourism brochure offered at hotels, restaurants, visitors' centers, car rental agencies, travel agencies, etc., all over California; said $50,000 would be spent this year advertising in newspaper travel sections and Sunset magazine; said tourism was good for hotels, restaurants, and shops, and provides sales tax for the City; said the Chamber provides free booths and donations to local charities; said additional City income comes from the $25 temporary business licenses for Fiestas vendors; Kevin McCarthy — Vice Chair of Tourism for Hermosa Beach, said that the Fiestas help the local merchants and fill hotel rooms; Carla Merriman — Executor Director, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and Visitor's Bureau, said information gathered by independent research from the 730 surveys returned by visitors after the last Labor Day Fiesta indicates that, among other facts learned, 84% of visitors patronize the local businesses, with 43% of the visitors from the South Bay area and the rest from the 3 -hour driving radius, which is the area targeted for Hermosa Beach tourism. The public hearing closed at 9:58 p.m. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Approve the request for two 2004 Fiestas, including the following additional items: waive application, banner and amplification fees as a non-profit organization and bill only for actual costs for various direct services, use of Proposition A funds for the shuttle bus, vendor booths on Pier Plaza to be removed at the end of each event day; and City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11321 • • (2) Direct staff to return at the meeting of February 24, 2004 with a multi- year agreement with the Chamber of Commerce similar to the agreement in effect during 1996-2000; with the agreement amended under Section 1, subsection d, to require the annual review within 90 days after the Labor Day Fiesta, at which time the Chamber of Commerce would provide the copies of all records and make an agendized presentation at a City Council meeting. Motion Reviczky, second Yoon. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. d. INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES A PORTION OF 22ND STREET, BETWEEN THE STRAND AND BEACH DRIVE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated January 5, 2004. Public Works Director Morgan presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 10:12 p.m. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 10:12 p.m. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 04- 6319, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES A PORTION OF 22ND STREET, BETWEEN THE STRAND AND BEACH DRIVE, AS SHOWN ON THE TRACT OF HERMOSA BEACH AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGES 25 AND 26, IN THE OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER." Motion Tucker, second Reviczky. The motion carried with a unanimous vote. e. TEXT AMENDMENT TO CLARIFY THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN RESTAURANTS AND SNACK SHOPS. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld. Action: To continue the hearing to the February 10, 2004 meeting, as recommended by staff. Motion Reviczky second Yoon. The motion carried with a unanimous vote. At 10:15 p.m., the order of the agenda moved to item 6.e. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. NUISANCE ABATEMENT OF PROPERTY AT 24 EIGHTH STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 16, 2003. City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11322 • • Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 04- 6320, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING TO DETERMINE IF THE PROPERTY AT 24 EIGHTH STREET CONSTITUTES A PUBLIC NUISANCE" setting the public hearing for February 10, 2004. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 11:50 p.m. the order of the agenda moved to item 6.f. b. FILM PERMIT POLICY AND FEE SCHEDULE. Memorandum from Community Resources Department dated December 17, 2003. Action: Council consensus was to continue the item to the next meeting of January 27, 2004, due to the lateness of the evening. c. REPORT ON THE STRAND BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin dated January 5, 2004. Action: Council consensus was to continue the item to the next meeting of January 27, 2004, due to the lateness of the evening. d. TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND SECTION 17.46.010 TO CHANGE THE ALLOWABLE SIZE AND HEIGHT OF CHIMNEYS. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated November 25, 2003. Action: Council consensus was to continue the item to the next meeting of January 27, 2004, due to the lateness of the evening. e. CITY'S BANNER PROGRAM. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated January 5, 2004. Public Works Director Morgan presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions, noted that CalTrans had agreed to a meeting with City representatives, and asked Council subcommittee members Edgerton and Yoon about their availability for a meeting later this month. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Roger Bacon — owner of Ralph's Shopping Center, said he had spoken to Coastal Netting Systems, the installers of a net at Pollywog Park in Manhattan Beach to keep baseballs out, to obtain some preliminary calculations, which indicate that replacement and/or changes were needed with the poles, banners, and fasteners; suggested that this item be tabled until representative from Coastal Netting Systems could perform thorough calculations; City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11323 • • Heidi Sanders — Co -President of the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation, said the Foundation hoped that the banner can be maintained at the Pacific Coast Highway location; and Maria Flannigan — Hermosa Beach, concurred that the location at Pacific Coast Highway was the most desirable. Action: To receive and file the report and direct staff to agendize this item again after the meeting with CalTrans, expected to be scheduled for late January 2004. Motion Mayor Keegan, second Yoon. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 10:30 p.m., the order of the agenda moved to item 6.g. f. PROJECT NO. CIP 00-630 PIER RENOVATION — PHASE 11I. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated January 5, 2004. Public Works Director Morgan presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. Action: To reject all bids, as recommended by staff, and to establish a Council subcommittee comprised of Councilmembers Edgerton and Tucker to work with staff to consider modifications to the approved plan in order to decrease the cost. Motion Reviczky, second Yoon. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 12:04 a.m., Councilmember Edgerton left the meeting, and the order of the agenda moved to item 4 for consideration of those items removed from the consent calendar. g. REGULATION OF ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICES. Memorandum from City Attorney Michael Jenkins dated January 13, 2004. City Attorney Jenkins presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: John Hales — Hermosa Beach, said that after he wrote a letter to the editor opposing Segways, Mr. Aronoff invited him to try one; said the device weighs 81 pounds with wheels 22" in diameter and inflated tires almost 3" across, and a vehicle that heavy was dangerous; said the City of San Francisco had banned them and Hermosa should find out why; said he had spent a lot of time on the Strand and felt they would be a hazard; said that some insurance companies might not cover them; City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11324 • • Joe Terry, Hermosa Beach, said he supported the experimental use of new technology and this device was revolutionary; said banning new technology sends the wrong message to children; said safety issues could be addressed and thought companies renting the devices would assume liability for injury; Bob Aronoff — Hermosa Beach, said the State of California has determined these unique devices as alternative transportation for those with limited mobility, that they were not electric skateboards or scooters, and the Council did not have to worry about opening flood gates because the $4,500 price would limit their use; said they were used by the elderly, not young kids, that they are self balancing, allow complete control, and could move at 12.5 miles per hour, but noted that control, not _ speed, was the issue because they can move around furniture and in stores and were designed to co -exist with pedestrians; Dean Francois — Hermosa Beach, Friends of South Bay Bicycles Paths, said he was opposed to paving any more of the beach because his primary concern was the environment, and the Strand was for recreation; said the devices could be used on the streets, but the Strand should be for self-propelled vehicles only; said that simple rule would eliminate the need for an ordinance; Wanda Johnston — Hermosa Beach, said the Strand was for pedestrians; said bicycles go too fast and endanger walkers, but at least they are self- propelled; said motorized vehicles do not belong on the Strand; and Jason Stunweir — Hermosa Beach, said that a Los Angeles City task force, with a diverse group of people, performed a risk management study and concluded that Segways should not be completely banned in the City of Los Angeles because of environmental benefits but should be regulated instead with common sense restrictions. Action: To waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 04-1236, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PROHIBITING THE OPERATION OF ELECTRONIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICES ("EPAMDs") ON THE STRAND, ON PIER PLAZA, AND ON SIDEWALKS IN THE COMMERCIAL ZONES OF THE CITY, AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE" as amended this evening to add Pier Plaza to the locations where the devices would be prohibited, and to appropriately change the wording of the exception from "people unable to walk" to the State language to read "any person, who by reason of physical disability, is unable to move about as a pedestrian," with the additional requirement that the person also have in his or her possession a State -issued disabled parking placard. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. h. STATUS REPORT ON WIFI/BROADBAND SYSTEM INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ON A PHASED APPROACH. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated January 8, 2004. City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11325 • • City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. At 11:28 p.m., Mayor pro Tempore Yoon recused himself from this item out of concern that there may be a conflict concerning his employment with a cable modem Internet provider. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Review and approve the proposal to install Wifi (wireless fideltity-802- 11a/g) Broadband System network in the City in a phased approach; and (2) _ Direct staff to return with agreements for the required purchases and installation services. Motion Reviczky, second Mayor Keegan. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. At 11:45 p.m., the order of the agenda moved to item 6.a. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 29, 2003. Action: Council consensus was to continue the item to the next meeting of January 27, 2004, due to the lateness of the evening. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS — JANUARY 2004. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated December 24, 2003. Action: Council consensus was to continue the item to the next meeting of January 27, 2004, due to the lateness of the evening. b. REPORT OF CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEYS/COMPLAINTS. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated January 7, 2004. Action: Council consensus was to continue the item to the next meeting of January 27, 2004, due to the lateness of the evening. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11326 • • Earlier in the evening, following public participation, City Manager Burrell requested that the Council consider adding an item to the closed session, a workers' compensation case involving the City and Michael Schubach. Action: To add to the closed session agenda (as item 5) a workers' compensation case involving Michael Schubach, based on the findings that the issue arose after the posting of the agenda and required immediate action. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on December 9, 2003. 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 a. Property: Two contiguous parcel fronting 2nd and 3rd Streets, APN 4188-028-070 & 073 Negotiating Parties: Stephen Burrell and Crosswind Capital, Inc. Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment 3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Stephen Burrell Employee Organization: Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association 4. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager 5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: WCAB Number: CLAIM Number: ACS Number: Schubach v. City of Hermosa Beach AHM 0094390 01-24846 1154-727 City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11327 • • ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION — The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at the hour of 12:14 a.m. to a closed session. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION — The Closed Session convened on Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at the hour of 12:25 a.m. At the hour of 1:40 a.m., the Closed Session adjourned to the Regular Meeting. ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS — There were no decisions made requiring a public announcement. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at the hour of 1:41 a.m. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, January 27, 2004, at the hour of 7:10 p.m. ak.L.6 De ' ut City Clerk City Council Minutes 01-13-04 Page 11328 vchlist Check Register v� Page: 1 01/22/2004 5:20:26PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35525 1/22/2004 12396 ADELPHIA 821117899000 Air Traffic Monitoring System/1/04 715-12064201 136.80 Total : 136.80 526 1/22/2004 12066 AIT 4012 Exabyte Tapes/Jan 04 715-1206-4305 4024 Laser Toner Purchase/Jan 04 715-1206-4305 4031 Toner Cartridges/Jan 04 715-1206-4309 181.24 62.71 495.41 Total : 739.36 35527 1/22/2004 00152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 586-3579526 Shop Towels/Dec 03 715-4206-4309 39.57 586-3579527 Mats/Shop Towels/Dec 03 001-3104-4309 66.92 586-3579528 Mats/Shop Towel Services/12/03 001-2201-4309 44.27 586-3579529 Mats Cleaned/Dec 03 001-2101-4309 53.58 586-3579530 Mats Cleaned/Dec 03 001-4204-4309 59.22 • 586-3579532 Mats Cleaned/Dec 03 001-4204-4309 70.45 586-3588467 Shop Towels/Dec 03 715-4206-4309 39.57 586-3588468 Mats/Shop Towels/Dec 03 001-3104-4309 66.92 586-3588469 Mats/Shop Towel Service/12/03 001-2201-4309 46.83 586-3588470 Mats Cleaned/Dec 03 001-2101-4309 53.58 586-3588471 Mats Cleaned/Dec 03 001-4204-4309 59.22 2b vchlist Check Register Page: 2 01/22/2004 5:20:26PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35527 1/22/2004 00152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 5863588473 Mats Cleaned/Dec 03 0014204-4309 70.45 586-3597710 Shop Towel Services/Dec 03 0 586-3597711 715-4206-4309 39.57 Mats/Shop Towels/Dec 03 001-31044309 66.92 586-3597712 Mats/Shop Towel Service/12/03 001-2201-4309 44.27 586-3597713 Mats Cleaned/Dec 03 001-2101-4309 53.58 586-3597714 Mats Cleaned/Dec 03 001-4204-4309 59.22 586-3597716 Mats Cleaned/Dec 03 001-4204-4309 70.45 Total : 1,004.59 35528 1/22/2004 05179 AT&T 019360838200 Long Distance Charges/Dec 03 001-2101-4304 96.52 001-4204-4321 13.59 001-22014304 34.74 001-42024304 44.59 • 0014201-4304 14.62 001-1201-4304 22.87 001-46014304 27.94 715-1206-4304 5.40 001-11214304 0.81 001-11324304 0.41 001-1202-4304 7.93 001-12034304 5.08 001-11414304 3.25 0014101-4304 3.66 110-1204-4304 4.07 110-33024304 9.71 Total : 295.19 35529 1/22/2004 12268 BEACH CITIES SCREENPRINTING 4202-15069 Friends of Dewey T-Shirts/2nd Pm Page: 2 2 - vchlist Check Register Page: 3 01/22/2004 5:20:26PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35529 1/22/2004 12268 BEACH CITIES SCREENPRINTING (Continued) 001-2160 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.00 35530 1/22/2004 09104 BLENDER, TRACY 4601-03586 Instructor Payment/#8062 001-4601-4221 956.20 • Total : 956.20 35531 1/22/2004 12459 BORDEN LABLE & DECAL 80875 PARKING PERMITS & WINDOW 1 14905 110-1204-4305 4,834.91 Total : 4,834.91 35532 1/22/2004 11423 BOTACH TACTICAL 57415 BATTERIES FOR ELECTRONIC P 14973 110-3302-4309 1,009.00 110-3302-4309 80.44 Total : 1,089.44 35533 1/22/2004 12476 BRENTON SAFETY 857419-04 PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUI 14921 150-2109-5401 26.44 150-2109-5401 1.87 Total : 28.31 35534 1/22/2004 00262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 50740 Vinyl Letters for Police Department 001-2101-4305 15.16 Total: 15.16 .535 1/22/2004 07700 CPRS 4601-03595 4601-03596 35536 1/22/2004 08855 D & D DISPOSAL, INC. 10042 35537 1/22/2004 08359 DARE AMERICA MERCHANDISE MN -22385 Conference Registration/3/10-13/ 001-4601-4317 Registration/Martinez/Coicord 001-4601-4315 Total : Dead Animal Disposal/Dec 03 110-3302-4201 Educational Materials 001-2101-4305 Total : 802.00 86.00 888.00 285.00 285.00 230.66 Page: 3 3 vchlist Check Register Page: 4 01/22/2004 5:20:26PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code: boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 35537 1/22/2004 08359 DARE AMERICA MERCHANDISE (Continued) 35538 1/22/2004 00049 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 4201-15074 PO # Description/Account Amount Total : 230.66 Strong Motion Mapping Fee/10/03- 001-3204 1,356.73 Total : 1,356.73 .5539 1/22/2004 00147 DEVELOPMENT, THE 141514 Film Developing/Arson Investigat 001-2201-4305 294.18 Total : 294.18 35540 1/22/2004 06974 EMBASSY SUITES 865 Lodging/Brian Scott 001-2201-4317 433.44 Total : 433.44 35541 1/22/2004 12510 EMBASSY SUITES SAN DIEGO BAY 861 Lodging/Gomez/2/2-2/4/04 001-2201-4317 662.67 862 Lodging/Crawford/2/2-2/4/04 001-2201-4317 662.67 863 Lodging/Garofano/Bush/2/2-2/4/04 001-2201-4317 662.67 Total : 1,988.01 35542 1/22/2004 08422 FIRE INFORMATION SUPPORT SERV 423 Record Management Upgrade 001-2201-4201 680.00 Total: 680.00 35543 1/22/2004 06344 FIRST CALL STAFFING SERVICES 0709-82301 Temporary Services/1/5-1/08/04 001-4201-4201 716.00 Total : 716.00 35544 1/22/2004 00059 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFCRS ASSN 1202-15094 Application /CAFR Achievement P 001-1202-4201 415.00 Total : 415.00 35545 1/22/2004 04108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, INC. 01/20/2004 Worker's Comp Claims/1/16/2004 705-1217-4324 7,715.13 Total : 7,715.13 Page: 4 y vchlist Check Register Page: 5 0112212004 5:20:26PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35546 1/22/2004 00065 HERMOSA BEACH CAR WASH, ZIPP, IN 12/2003 47 1/22/2004 12507 HERMOSA BEACH EDUCATION 35548 1/22/2004 06562 INTOXIMETERS 35549 1/22/2004 04908 JAMESTOWN PRESS 35550 1/22/2004 11251 KNICKERBOCKER, JANICE S. 35551 1/22/2004 00151 L.A. CO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT .552 1/22/2004 02175 LIEBERT, CASSIDY WHITMORE 35553 1/22/2004 10496 MBS, A MINOLTA KONICA MINOLTA 4202-15070 135084 4581 1202-15077 63080 39771 201883600 35554 1/22/2004 12077 MONSTER TRAK 1809588 Car Washes/Dec 03 715-3302-4311 715-2101-4311 7154202-4311 Total : Reimbursement For Banner Inst 001-3211 14.95 309.95 9.90 334.80 236.00 Total : 236.00 Mouthpieces/DUI Testing Equipme 001-21014305 Total : 22,000 Master Business Cards 001-12084305 2003 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 Total : Total : Arrestee Processing Fees/Nov 03 001-2101-4251 452.50 452.50 639.76 639.76 24.61 24.61 291.68 Total : 291.68 Legal Re: Disability Retirement 001-1203-4201 Copier Usage/Dec 03 001-4601.4201 001-1208-4201 001-2201-4201 110-3302-4201 Total : 212.40 212.40 263.93 85.55 0.05 0.47 Total : 350.00 Employment Ad/Theater Technic Page: 5 5 vchlist Check Register Page: 6 01/22/2004 5:20:26PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35554 1/22/2004 12077 MONSTER TRAK (Continued) 001-1203-4201 175.00 1809594 Employment Ad/Theater House M 001-1203-4201 175.00 Total : 350.00 35555 555 1/22/2004 08170 MUNICIPAL MAINT. EQUIPMENT 0026552 -IN Interface Cable/Go-4/Jan 04 715-3302-4311 126.70 Total : 126.70 35556 1/22/2004 01649 PACIFIC SALES 2057046 Refrigeration For Community Servi 001-2101-5401 396.20 Total : 396.20 35557 1/22/2004 11314 PALM SPRINGS FOLLIES, THE 4601-03592 Final Payment/Excursion/2/08/04 001-4601-4308 1,503.00 Total : 1,503.00 35558 1/22/2004 08760 R.P. ASSOCIATES,INC. 28653 Required Workout Apparel Purcha 001-2201-4314 1,154.59 Total : 1,154.59 35559 1/22/2004 03353 S.B.C.U. VISA 01/12/04 Service Fee • 001-1101-4319 0.05 3066 Airfarernpley/12/15/03 001-2201-4317 212.50 5812 Holiday Party/Dec 2003 001-1101-4319 3,050.00 6011 Reimbursed Cash Advance/1/2004 001-3904 42.00 Total : 3,304.55 35560 1/22/2004 09951 SANTA ANA COLLEGE 2201-15056 Repistration/Grebbien/A-1/2/2-2/6/ 001-2201-4317 125.00 Total : 125.00 35561 1/22/2004 00321 SBC 248 134-9454 Computer Hook-Ups/Jan/04 Page: 6 vchlist Check Register Page: 7 01122/2004 5:20:26PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 35561 1/22/2004 00321 35562 1/22/2004 01670 • 35563 1/22/2004 12511 35564 1/22/2004 09139 35565 1/22/2004 12349 35566 1/22/2004 06991 •567 1/22/2004 00015 SBC SCOTT, BRIAN P. SCOTT, C. MICHAEL SECURED STORAGE (Continued) 865 1141-15096 2-1518 TAUSSIG & ASSOCIATES, INC, DAVID 3120071 THOMPSON, JEAN VERIZON CALIFORNIA 14362 1202-15078 Description/Account 001-2101-4304 Per Diem/1/26-1/28 001-2201-4317 Amount Total : Total : Work Guarantee Refund/#4822 001-2110 10.56 10.56 150.00 150.00 1,600.00 Total : 1,600.00 4th Quarter Storage & Admin Fee 001-1121-4201 CONSULTING SERVICES 311-8106-4201 2003 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 310 318-0200 Phone Charges/Jan 04 Total : Total : Total : 48.00 48.00 1,303.93 1,303.93 24.61 24.61 1 Page: 7 vchlist Check Register Page: 8 01/22/2004 5:20:26PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code: boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35567 1/22/2004 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA (Continued) 310 406-2421 001-1121-4304 6.59 001-1201-4304 29.67 001-11324304 3.30 001-1141-4304 26.37 001-1202-4304 64.28 001-1203-4304 41.21 715-12064304 42.86 001-1208-4304 3.30 001-2101-4304 497.81 001-2201-4304 210.99 110-1204-4304 32.97 110-3302-4304 89.01 001-4101-4304 29.67 001-4201-4304 47.80 001-4601-4304 189.54 0014202-4304 332.96 Phone Outside PD To RCC/Jan 04 001-2101-4304 47.13 Total : 1,695.46 35568 1/22/2004 11219 WESTCHESTER MEDICAL GROUP 1203-15066 Physical Exams/Dec 03 001-1203-4320 1,500.00 • Total : 1,500.00 44 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 40,936.46 44 Vouchers In this report Total vouchers : 40,936.46 Page: 8 vchlist Check Register Page: 1 01129/2004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor 35569 1/29/2004 12482 1470 1/29/2004 06827 35571 1/29/2004 09484 35572 1/29/2004 02487 • 35573 35574 35575 Invoice PO # DescriptlonlAccount Amount 1/29/2004 11820 1/29/2004 11076 1/29/2004 08482 ACCURINT ALL CITY MANAGEMENT APWA ARCH WIRELESS BESTY ROSS FLAG GIRLS WC BOSSONIS, ANDRONIKI BOUND TREE MEDICAL,LLC 20031130 INFORMATION SERVICES - NOV 001-2101-4201 20031231 Information Services - Dec'03 001-2101-4201 Total : 947 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 7 14392 001-2102-4201 Total : 618647 Membership RenewaiN. Jackson m7896291K M7896291L 620588-C 4601-03597 860576 001-4202-4315 Pager Services/Oct 03 001-2101-4201 110-3302-4201 001-46014201 001-42024201 715-12064201 Pager Services/Nov 03 001-2101-4201 001-4601-4201 0014202-4201 715-12064201 U.S. Flags 00142044309 Instructor Payment/#8183 00146014221 Medical Supplies/Jan 04 Total : Total : Total : Total : 0.85 11.05 11.90 1,678.56 1,678.56 147.50 147.50 12.20 3.73 16.42 15.85 7.97 12.89 26.84 70.28 8.45 174.63 383.40 383.40 617.40 617.40 Page: 1 9 vchlist Check Register Page: 2 01/29/2004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptlonlAccount Amount 35575 1/29/2004 08482 BOUND TREE MEDICAL,LLC (Continued) 001-2201-4309 10.93 Total : 10.93 45576 1/29/2004 12476 BRENTON SAFETY 857418-01 PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUI 14926 150-2109-5401 366.58 857418-02 PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUI 14926 150-2109-5401 615.72 857419-05 PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUI 14921 150-2109-5401 665.99 857419-06 PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUI 14921 150-2109-5401 8,425.25 857419-07 PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUI 14921 150-2109-5401 . 3,305.53 860662-00 Credit Freight Charges 150-2109-5401 -22.16 860666-00 Credit/Freight Charges 150-2109-5401 -20.32 860667-00 Credit Freight Charges 150-2109-5401 -8.73 860669-00 Credit Freiqht Charges 150-2109-5401 -24.96 • 860673-00 Credit Freight Charges 150-2109-5401 -3.74 860674-00 Credit Freight Charges 150-2109-5401 -16.17 860703-00 Credit Freight Charges 150-2109-5401 -5.51 860705-00 Credit Freight Charges 150-2109-5401 -12.97 860706-00 Credit Freight Charges 150-2109-5401 -5.61 86077-00 Credit Freight Charges 150-2109-5401 -38.70 Total : 13,220.20 Page: 2 ID vchlist Check Register Page: 3 01/29/2004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptlonlAccount Amount 35577 1/29/2004 12469 BRITE INC/US MARKERBOARD 400106 OUTDOOR DIRECTORY BOARD 14874 001-8622-4201 493.93 Total : 493.93 35578 1/29/2004 05621 BURRELL, STEPHEN R. 866 Per Diem/2/04-2/06/04 001-1202-4317 150.00 • Total : 150.00 35579 1/29/2004 08585 BUSH, AARON 864 Per Diem/2/2-2/5/04 001-2201-4317 200.00 Total : 200.00 35580 1/29/2004 01037 CALBO 3099 CALBO EDUCATIONAL COURSE 14746 001-4201-4317 780.00 Total : 780.00 35581 1/29/2004 12230 CALIFORNIA OVERNIGHT 4185586 Express Mail/Jan 03 001-4202-4201 12.25 Total : 12.25 35582 1/29/2004 12477 CAMPBELL CONSTRUCTION, ROBERT Permit 4077 Work Guarantee Refund -Permit 4 001-2110 4583 1/29/2004 07022 CARSON, ROBERT 1202-15128 35584 1/29/2004 05595 COACH USA 90753 35585 1/29/2004 04715 COLEN AND LEE 1511 ' 35586 1/29/2004 05970 COLLINS, DENNIS 4601-03600 2003 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 1,600.00 Total : 1,600.00 Total : Rose Parade Excursion Transport 145-3409-4201 24.61 24.61 1,434.80 Total : 1,434.80 Claims Administration/Dec 03 705-1209-4201 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.00 Instructor Payment/#8224 001-4601-4221 535.50 Page: 3 1 1 vchlist Check Register Page: 4 01129/2004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35586 1/29/2004 05970 COLLINS, DENNIS (Continued) Total : 535.50 35587 1/29/2004 12116 COMERICA BANK -CA SPECIAL CORP. 3508 RETENTION HELD IN ESCROW C 13792 150-8411-4201 73.53 Total : 73.53 5588 1/29/2004 09902 CONNECT TELEVISION 80754 CALIBRATE & TEST SATELLITE F 14770 715-12064201 195.00 Total : 195.00 35589 1/29/2004 09614 CONTINENTAL MAPPING SERVICE 11204 300' Noticing/Jan 04 001-4101-4201 1,223.00 Total : 1,223.00 35590 1/29/2004 12515 COOPER, ROBERT 1204-15079 Citation Refund/Admin Hearing 110-3302 35.00 Total : 35.00 35591 1/29/2004 07809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 48082333 Credit Retumed Merchandise/1990 001-1208-4305 -4.58 48905765 Office Supplies 001-1208-4305 292.12 49029268 Office Supplies • 49128649 001-1208-4305 95.28 Credit Retumed Merchandise/0654 001-1208-4305 -200.04 49141168 Office Supplies 001-1208-4305 179.53 49175167 Office Supplies 001-1208-4305 279.39 Total : 641.70 35592 1/29/2004 12514 CPPA TREASURER, NANCY FOX 1204-15119 Membership Dues/M. Hall 110-12044315 100.00 Total : 100.00 35593 1/29/2004 02823 CRAWFORD, JAMES 862 Per Diem/2/02-2/05/04 Page: 4 is vchlist Check Register Page: 5 01/29/2004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code: boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35593 1/29/2004 02823 CRAWFORD, JAMES 35594 1/29/2004 01390 DAPPER TIRE CO. • 35595 1/29/2004 06100 DATA VAULT 35596 1/29/2004 11398 DEBILIO DISTRIBUTORS,INC 35597 1/29/2004 00267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 166177 35598 1/29/2004 08242 DESLANDES, LYNDA 0599 1/29/2004 00122 DUNCAN PARKING TECHNOLOGIES, 35600 1/29/2004 00181 EASY READER 35601 1/29/2004 01469 EL CAMINO COLLEGE DISTRICT (Continued) 331938 331941 402-57367 130655 4601-03598 19271 0268 0460637 001-2201-4317 Tire Purchase/January 04 715-2101-4311 Tire Purchase/January 04 715-2101-4311 Off Site Storage - Feb '04 715-1206-4201 Prisoner's Meals - Jan '04 001-2101-4305 200.00 Total : 200.00 Total : Total : Total : HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE - DEC 105-2601-4251 Total: 179.08 179.08 358.16 198.33 198.33 162.67 162.67 342.12 342.12 Instructor Payment/#8121 001-4601-4221 1,218.00 Total : 1,218.00 REPLACEMENT PART FOR HAN 15012 110-3302-4309 Dec '03 Legal Ads 001-1121-4323 Total : Total : 351.12 351.12 425.12 425.12 HAZMAT Class/Fall 1999 001-2201-4317 308.00 Total : 308.00 Page: 5 13 vchlist Check Register Page: 6 01/2912004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code: boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35602 1/29/2004 01294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICES INC. 1700-101B Janitorial Services/Jail/12/03 001-4204-4201 750.00 1700-105A Janitorial Services/Police Dept/12/C 001-4204-4201 1,200.00 • 1703-104 Janitorial Services/City Hall/12/03 001-4204-4201 1,245.00 1704-101 Janitorial Services/Base 3/12/03 001-4204-4201 290.00 1705-101 Janitorial Services/Clark Bldg/12/0 001-4204-4201 365.00 1706-103 Janitorial Services/Commuinity Crt 001-42044201 3,910.00 1707-101 Janitorial Services/City Yard/12/03 001-4202-4201 325.00 1861-041 Janitorial Services/Bowling Green/1 001-4204-4201 195.00 1884-028 Janitorial Services/So Park/12/03 00142044201 55.00 Total : 8,335.00 35603 1/29/2004 10668 EXXON MOBIL FLEET/GECC, ACCT # 36 4177897 Fuel Purchases/Dec 03 715-2101-4310 3,130.00 715-2201-4310 268.80 715-4201-4310 96.27 7154202-4310 62.83 715-6101-4310 195.31 715-3302-4310 278.72 715-31044310 202.96 71546014310 80.52 715-26014310 119.32 715-31024310 48.94 001-1250 41.90 Total : 4,525.57 35604 1/29/2004 06344 FIRST CALL STAFFING SERVICES 709-82465 TEMP. STAFF -WEEK ENDING 1 00142014201 716.00 Page: 6 �LI vchlist Check Register Page: 7 01/29/2004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35604 1/29/2004 06344 FIRST CALL STAFFING SERVICES 35605 1/29/2004 08652 GAROFANO, MICHAEL ,606 1/29/2004 10636 GECKO TROPHIES & ENGRAVING 35607 1/29/2004 12519 GERBRACHT, PABLO 35608 1/29/2004 11415 GHASSEMI, MARIA 35609 1/29/2004 11578 GOMEZ, JERRY 35610 1/29/2004 12311 GREMAUD, MARIE BAPTISTE 0611 1/29/2004 04108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, INC. 35612 1/29/2004 09136 HERMOSA AUTOMOTIVE (Continued) 863 1138 1202-15140 1202-15108 861 4601-03593 01/26/04 016275 016278 016282 016284 Per Diem/2/2-2/05/04 001-2201-4317 Total : Total : Roller Hockey Awards - Summer' 0014601-4308 Total : Refund Ambulance Transport 001-3840 Total : Expense Reimbursement/GFOA S 001-1202-4317 Total : Per Diem/2/2-2/05/04 001-2201-4317 Instructor Payment/#8205 001-4601-4221 Total : Total : Worker's Comp Claims/1/23/04 705-1217-4324 716.00 200.00 200.00 189.44 189.44 541.00 541.00 108.55 108.55 150.00 150.00 476.00 476.00 23,491.27 Total : 23,491.27 Smoq Check/1/04. 715-3302-4311 Smog Check/Certificate/1/04 715-61014311 Smoq Check/Certificate/1/04 715-3302-4311 Smoq Check/Certificate/1/04 715-21014311 31.00 41.00 31.00 31.00 Page: 7 (5 vchlist Check Register Page: 8 0112912004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code: boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35612 1/29/2004 09136 HERMOSA AUTOMOTIVE • (Continued) 016287 Smoq Check/Certificate/1/04 715-2101-4311 016288 Smog Check/1/04 715-6101-4311 016296 Smoq Check/1/04 715-4202-4311 016297 Smog Check/01/04 715-3102-4311 016298 Smog Check/Certificate/1/04 715-2101-4311 016304 Smoq Inspection/Certificate/1/03 715-2101-4311 Total : 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 320.00 35613 1/29/2004 12468 HYDRA INDUSTRIES 102 RUST EXTERMINATOR 14783 001-4204-4309 118.51 Total : 118.51 35614 1/29/2004 11237 IDYLL MOUNTAIN INTERNET 3308 WEB PAGE Posting/12/11-1/12/02 715-1206-4201 600.00 3309 Memorial Picture/Child Safety Pa • 001-2101-4305 30.00 Total : 630.00 35615 1/29/2004 10467 IMPERIAL RADIATOR INC. 202938 Radiator Purchase/Jan 04 715-2101-4311 342.72 203061 Compressor Parts/1 /04 715-2101-4311 291.15 Total : 633.87 35616 1/29/2004 02458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 195000-00 Electrical SuppliesfTennis Courts/1. 105-2601-4309 333.84 001-2021 6.28 001-2022 -6.28 Page: 8 vchlist Check Register Page: 9 01/2912004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code: boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35616 1/29/2004 02458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC (Continued) 195001-00 Electrical Supplies/Tennis Courts/1. 105-2601-4309 333.84 001-2021 628 001-2022 -6.28 195152-00 Electrical Supplies/Jan 04 111 001-4204-4309 275.08 001-2021 5.18 001-2022 -5.18 195153-00 Electrical Supplies/Jan 04 001-4204-4309 352.86 001-2021 6.64 001-2022 -6.64 195163-00 Electrical Supplies/Jan 03 001-4204-4309 108.38 001-2021 2.04 001-2022 -2.04 Total : 1,404.00 35617 1/29/2004 04908 JAMESTOWN PRESS 4602 BUSINESS CARDS 001-4202-4305 37.50 001-2201-4305 18.75 001-4201-4305 18.75 001-4202-4305 3.10 • 001-2201-4305 1.55 001-4201-4305 1.54 Total : 81.19 35618 1/29/2004 07032 KNAPP, RUTH 1202-15095 2003 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 35619 1/29/2004 00843 L.A. COUNTY METROPOLITAN 1040335 Bus Pass Sales/Jan 04 145-3403-4251 68.00 Total : 68.00 35620 1/29/2004 11452 LEHNER/MARTIN,INC 817333 Helium Tank Refilled Page: 9 11 vchlist 0112912004 5:36:24PM Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 10 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35620 1/29/2004 11452 LEHNER/MARTIN,INC 35621 1/29/2004 12113 LIM, LIZETTE • 35622 1/29/2004 05072 LINE MASTER 35623 1/29/2004 07236 LITTLE CO. OF MARY HOSPITAL (Continued) 116 3742 0013132461 Q013165891 0013165939 0013166340 0013182850 001319211 Q013194165 0013196320 0013196338 0013210594 Q013242917 001-4601-4309 Total : ROLLER HOCKEY LEAGUE PHO 03571 001-4601-4308 8.40 8.40 223.27 Total : 223.27 PARTS FOR PAINT SPRAY EQU 14978 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 Total : Blood Alcohol Draw/12/13/03 001-2101-4201 Blood Alcohol Draw/12/20/03 001-2101-4201 Blood Alcohol Draw/12/20/03 001-2101-4201 Blood Alcohol Draw/12/20/03 001-2101-4201 Blood Alcohol Draw/12/24/04 001-2101-4201 Blood Alcohol Draw/12/27/03 001-2101-4201 Blood Alcohol Draw/12/28/03 001-2101-4201 Blood Alcohol Draw/12/29/03 001-2101-4201 Blood Alcohol Draw/12/29/03 001-2101-4201 Blood Alcohol Draw/12/31/03 001-2101-4201 Blood Alcohol Draw/01/06/04 001-2101-4201 Total : 75.00 3.88 78.88 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 385.00 Page: 10 I$ vchlist Check Register Page: 11 01/29/2004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code: boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35624 1/29/2004 09267 LOS ANGELES BUSINESS JOURNAL 1202-15141 35625 1/29/2004 10045 MAIN STREET TOURS • 35626 1/29/2004 07133 35627 1/29/2004 01911 35628 1/29/2004 12513 35629 1/29/2004 08170 • MATSINGER, ANN MEDICAL INSTITUTE MOOTE ASSOC., INC, PAUL A. MUNICIPAL MAINT. EQUIPMENT 35630 1/29/2004 11676 NEXTEL 35631 1/29/2004 10139 PARKING CONCEPTS INC. Subscription/6/14/04-6/14/06 001-1202-4317 Total : 31429 Excursion Transportation/12/21/03 001-4601-4201 31430 Newport Boat Parade Excursion T 145-34094201 1202-15129 2003 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 179.95 179.95 881.00 435.00 Total : 1,316.00 567110550 Total : First Aid/12/26/2003 & 12/30/2003 001-1203-4320 Total : 21964 REVIEW OF BUILDING INSPECT 001-4101-4201 24.61 24.61 307.00 307.00 2,562.63 Total : 2,562.63 26553 GFI COMMUNICATION SOFTWAF 14859 715-3302-4311 224.72 715-3302-4311 17.66 Total : 242.38 551834312-02 Cell Phone Usage - Dec '03 001-4601-4304 Total : 284-1203 ANNUAL OPERATIONS FY 03/04 14447 109-33044231 285-1203 LOT A OPERATIONS 14446 109-3305-4231 35632 1/29/2004 10160 PAYNE, BOB &BARBARA 1141-15097 Settlement Agreement 154.86 154.86 13,882.36 11,486.77 Total : 25,369.13 Page: 11 �9 vchlist Check Register Page: 12 01/29/2004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code: boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 35632 1/29/2004 10160 35633 1/29/2004 11329 • 35634 1/29/2004 12516 35635 1/29/2004 11539 PAYNE, BOB &BARBARA PIZER, RONALD & TONI PORTERFIELD, GINA PROSUM TECHNOLOGY 35636 1/29/2004 08364 PVP COMMUNICATIONS,INC. • 35637 1/29/2004 08837 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF (Continued) 1141-15098 89181 Description/Account Amount 001-2110 1,100.00 Total : 1,100.00 Settlement Agreement 001-2110 1,400.00 Class Refund 001-2111 Total : Total : 10128 Consulting Services/Dec 03 001-2101-4201 9580 IT SYSTEM SUPPORT/2003-2004 14725 715-1206-4201 9873A IT SYSTEM SUPPORT/2003-2004 14725 715-1206-4201 9873B Systems Support/Nov 1-28/03 001-2101-4201 4861 15002 1,400.00 80.00 80.00 1,906.25 600.00 18.75 1,593.75 Total : 4,118.75 SET-UP FOR NEW BMW MOTOR 715-2101-5403 872.12 Total : 872.12 92825 Artesia Blvd Rehab Project/Final P 146-8174-4201 92826 Fuel Purchases - Dec '03 715-3302-4310 715-4204-4310 715-1202-4310 715-4202-4310 715-4201-4310 715-2201-4310 28,269.00 36.10 31.12 0.02 4.97 19.17 505.15 Page: 12 ao vchlist Check Register Page: 13 01/29/2004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Descrlptlon/Account Amount 35637 1/29/2004 08837 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF • 35638 35639 35640 1/29/2004 03726 1/29/2004 06473 1/29/2004 12425 •641 1/29/2004 09951 (Continued) 92836 92847 RUSHER AIR CONDITIONING 96212 RxLASER, INC. 21380 SAN DIEGO PRECAST CONCRETE 00096303 -IN SANTA ANA COLLEGE 2201-14946 2201-14948 2201-14950 2201-14952 35642 1/29/2004 00321 SBC 15021 Fuel Purchase/Oct 03 715-2201-4310 715-4204-4310 715-1202-4310 715-4201-4310 715-3302-4310 FUEL PURCHASES - NOV '03 715-2201-4310 715-3302-4310 715-4204-4310 715-4201-4310 Total : REPAIR HEATING UNIT AT CITY 0014204-4201 Tax Forms 001-1202-4305 Total : Total : TRASH/RECYCLE CONTAINERS 138.39 26.83 11.27 7.58 39.68 149.17 45.56 16.78 7.36 29,308.15 510.00 510.00 63.71 63.71 14723 117-5301-5499 10,656.04 Total : 10,656.04 Repistration/DeLos Santos/1B/2114 001-2201-4317 Registration/Glen Ewart/ 1B/2/14-21 001-2201-4317 Registration/Garofano/1 B/2/14-28/ 001-2201-4317 Registration/W iIIiams/1 B/2/14-28/0 001-2201-4317 331 254-6071 Computer Hook-Ups/Jan 04 Total : 125.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 500.00 Page: 13 aI vchlist Check Register Page: 14 01/29/2004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 35642 1/29/2004 00321 SBC (Continued) 333 267 6161 333 267 6164 • 333 267 6165 333 267-6160 333267-6155 35643 1/29/2004 12034 SHAWNAN 3508 13619 001-2101-4304 57.80 Circuit Billing/1/04 001-2101-4304 753.78 Circuit Billing/Jan 04 001-2101-4304 50.81 Circuit Billing/Jan 04 001-2101-4304 50.81 Circuit Billing/Jan 04 001-2101-4304 59.60 Circuit Billing/Jan 04 001-2101-4304 188.80 Total : 1,161.60 SEWER AND STREET IMPROVE 160-8411-4201 661.77 Total : 661.77 35644 1/29/2004 09656 SHRED IT CALIFORNIA 33330736 Destruction Services/1/04 001-2101-4201 •35645 1/29/2004 11831 SIR SPEEDY 9874 ADA Improvement Spec Books 001-8622-4201 35646 1/29/2004 10532 SOUTH BAY FORD 35619 Auto Part Purchases/Jan 04 715-2101-4311 35774 Auto Part Purchase/Jan 04 715-33024311 FXCN802432 REPLACE/REPAIR TRANSMISSI 15046 715-2101-4311 Total : Total : Total : 90.00 90.00 84.44 84.44 41.67 90.68 341.87 474.22 35647 1/29/2004 08812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC COMM 200203311 Chargers/Traffic Office/Sept 03 001-2101-4307 483.07 Page: 14 22 vchlist Check Register Page: 15 01/2912004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code: boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescrlptionlAccount Amount 35647 1/29/2004 08812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC COMM (Continued) 200304188 *48 1/29/2004 12518 TAIT & ASSOCIATES 35649 1/29/2004 10463 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 35650 1/29/2004 00124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 35651 1/29/2004 11102 4,52 1/29/2004 03209 35653 1/29/2004 07737 35654 1/29/2004 00315 #tttHNNMH 1/1/2004 00170 TORRANCE WHOLESALE NURSERY VERIZON WIRELESS -LA W ICKW IRE, ROBERT J. YAMADA COMPANY INC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 200304197 4101-15139 2213052 S1948837.001 196686 1835886746 1202-15090 1304 10210459003 Honeywell Batteries 001-2101-4307 Atlas & Thomas Guide 001-2101-4305 Total : Refund PDP/CUP Extension Filing 001-3883 Elevator Contract Service 109-3304-4201 Total : Total : Plumbing Supplies/January 04 160-3102-4309 001-2022 001-2021 Plant Purchase/11 /03 001-6101-4309 Total : Total : Cell Phone Billing/January 04 001-2101-4304 2003 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 Auto Parts 715-3102-4309 Total : Total: Total : Gas billing/11-17 to 12-17-03 354.25 87.09 924.41 287.00 287.00 517.50 517.50 206.81 -4.22 4.22 206.81 102.84 102.84 231.41 231.41 24.61 24.61 1.97 1.97 Page: 15 a3 vchlist Check Register 0112912004 5:36:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 16 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 1/1/2004 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. (Continued) 001-4204-4303 50.34 Total : 50.34 87 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 154,600.17 87 Vouchers In this report 1 hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages / to23 inclusive, of the check register for 11/Aare accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget? By Date (6421444) Finance Director 6-lit/of Total vouchers : 154,600.17 Page: 16 ay February 4 , 2004 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council February 10, 2004 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please ratify the following request for cancellation of the check listed below: #35158 —12/11/03 — Robert Campbell Construction — $1,600.00 Check was lost in the mail. A stop payment has been placed. Acct. # 001-2110 #35509 —1/15/04 — Santa Ana College — $125.00 The class was cancelled. The check was not mailed. Acct. # 001-2201-4317 Concur: / Ste. en R. Burrell, City Manager Workman, City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director • February 5, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council • ccr--/F Regular Meeting of February 10, 2004 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS I FEBRUARY 24, 2004 Consider multi-year Fiesta agreement with Chamber of Commerce City Manager Text amendment to amend Section 17.46.010 to change the allowable size and height of chimneys. Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of February 3, 2004. Community Resources Dept. Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of February 17, 2004. Community Development Director Activity Reports — January All Departments MARCH 9, 2004 Public Hearing: Special Events Community Resources Dept. Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of February 18, 2004. Public Works Director MARCH 23, 2004 Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of March 2, 2004. Community Resources Dept. Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of March 16, 2004. Community Development Director Activity Reports — February All Departments 2c • • 4°-/ Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 3, 2004 Council Meeting of February 10, 2004 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS DECEMBER 2003 Attached are the -December 2003 Revenue and Expenditure Status reports. The midyear budget review item on this agenda reviews the first half of the year and recommends adjustments to revenue and appropriations. NOTED: Respectfully submitted, -#212! Step en R. Burrell," Viki Copeland City Manager Finance Director 2d(,) h:\b95bpentrevexp dec with midyear.doc revstat.rpt 02/0212004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 1 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Seared 4,978,251.00 2,043,405.75 2,043,405.75 2,934,845.25 41.05 • 102 Current Year Unsecured 312,680.00 0.00 281,744.20 30,935.80 90.11 103 Prior Year Collections 100,000.00 -42,245.36 64,256.56 35,743.44 64.26 3106 Supplemental Roll SB813 132,000.00 37,188.56 73,589.08 58,410.92 55.75 3107 Transfer Tax 187,067.00 11,795.01 107,605.30 79,461.70 57.52 3108 Sates Tax 2,335,293.00 272,541.06 1,195,037.67 1,140,255.33 51.17 3109 1/2 Cent Sales Tx Ext 148,221.00 15,294.19 52,800.38 95,420.62 35.62 3110 Cable N Franchise 208,000.00 0.00 36,842.98 171,157.02 17.71 3111 Electric Franchise 63,000.00 0.00 0.00 63,000.00 0.00 3112 Gas Franchise 37,000.00 0.00 0.00 37,000.00 0.00 3113 Recuse Franchise 160,000.00 7,801.18 79,000.96 80,999.04 49.38 3114 Transient Occupancy Tax 1,105,321.00 0.00 378,952.59 726,368.41 34.28 3115 Business license 682,000.00 52,896.54 308,731.81 373,268.19 45.27 3120 Utility User Tax 2,098,600.00 198,548.28 974,143.47 1,124,456.53 46.42 Total Taxes 12,547,433.00 2,597,225.21 5,596,110.75 6,951,322.25 44.60 • 3200 Ucenses And Permits 3202 Dog licenses 9,000.00 445.50 7,367.50 1,632.50 81.86 3203 Bicycle Licenses 50.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 3204 Building Permits 267,400.00 28,254.37 191,794.41 75,605.59 71.73 3205 Electric Permits 56,000.00 4,318.00 30,775.00 25,225.00 54.96 3206 Plumbing Permits 40,250.00 2,840.00 20,732.40 19,517.60 51.51 3207 Occupancy Permits 8,700.00 500.00 3,350.00 5,350.00 38.51 Page: 1 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 2 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3209 Garage Sales 100.00 12.00 45.00 55.00 45.00 3211 Banner Permits 3,000.00 236.00 1,083.001,917.00 36.10 • 12 Animal/Fowl Permits 0.00 54.25 54.25 -54.25 47.8 0.006 13 Animal Redemption Fee 2,200.00 286.00 1,053.00 1,147.00 3214 Amplified Sound Permit 1,000.00 0.00 675.00 325.00 67.50 3215 Temporary Sign Permit 912.00 76.00 304.00 608.00 33.33 3216 Spray Booth Permit 125.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 3217 Open Fire Permit 100.00 53.00 106.00 -6.00 106.00 3218 Auto Repair Permit 2,514.00 518.00 4,366.00 -1,852.00 173.67 3219 Newsrack Permits 0.00225.00 225.00 -225.00 0.00 3225 Taxicab Permits 154,000.00 0.00 0.00 154,000.00 0.00 Total Licenses And Permits 545,351.00 37,818.12 261,930.56 283,420.44 48.03 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3301 Municipal Court Fines Total Fines & Forfeitures 000 Use Of Money & Property 230,000.00 48,809.97 154,961.70 75,038.30 67.37 230,000.00 - 48,809.97 154,961.70 75,038.30 67.37 3401 Interest Income 65,125.00 -14.88 15,668.27 49,456.73 24.06 3402 Rents & Concessions 300.00 0.00 18.94 281.06 6.31 3403 Pier Revenue 1,300.00 45.25 476.55 823.45 36.66 3404 Community Center Leases 64,000.00 5,219.80 31,897.08 32,102.92 49.84 3405 Community Center Rentals 35,000.00 -4,207.00 39,946.25 -4,946.25 114.13 3406 Community Center Theatre 45,000.00 6,637.50 26,459.50 18,540.50 58.80 3411 Other Facilities 12,000.00 976.25 6,088.25 5,911.75 50.74 3412 Tennis Courts 22,000.00 3,020.00 11,260.00 10,740.00 51.18 Page: 2 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3418 Special Events 40,000.00 8,958.00 19,907.00 20,093.00 49.77 3475 Investment Premium -2,206.00 -76.10 -1,103.56 -1,102.44 50.03 Total Use Of Money 8 Property 282,519.00 20,558.82 150,618.28 131,900.72 53.31 ipso° Intergovemmental/State 3504 In Lieu Off Highway 507.00 0.00 340.36 166.64 67.13 3505 In Lieu Motor Vehicle 1,040,000.00 19,958.51 174,689.10 865 31090 16.80 3507 Highway Maintenance 1,864.00 0.00 0.00 1,864.00 0.00 3508 Mandated Costs 0.00 0.00 729.20 -729.20 0.00 3509 Homeowner Property Tax Relief 70,810.00 10,499.14 10,499.14 60,310.86 14.83 3510 POST 0.00 0.00 16.00 -16.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 1,113,181.0030,457.65 186,273.80 926,907.20 16.73 3800 Current Service Charges 3801 Residential Inspection 15,000.00 1,050.00 8,650.00 6,350.00 57.67 3802 Sign Review 2,060.00 309.00 1,133.00 927.00 55.00 3803 Environmental Impact 2,262.00 377.00 377.00 1,885.00 16.67 3805 Conditional Use Permit Amendment 2,454.00 0.00 2,045.00 409.00 83.33 •806 Board Of Appeals 0.00 0.00 191.00 -191.00 0.00 3807 Refuse Uen Fees/Consolidated 737.00 3,389.86 3,438.62 -2,701.62 466.57 3808 Zone Variance Review I 4,720.00 1,180.00 4,720.00 0.00 100.00 3809 Tentative Map Review 1,175.00 1,175.00 1,175.00 0.00 100.00 3810 Final Map Review 5,740.00 0.00 3,157.00 2,583.00 55.00 3811 Zone Change/Gen Plan Amendment 0.00 3,064.00 3,064.00 -3,064.00 0.00 3812 Conditional Use Review 20,682.00 2,490.00 11,108.00 9,574.00 53.71 3813 Plan Chedc Fees 194,480.00 22,957.40 123,509.60 70,970.40 63.51 Page: 3 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 4 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3814 Planning/Zoning Appeal 618.00 0.00 618.00 0.00 100.00 3815 Public Works Services 14,000.00 4,184.00 12,796.08 1,203.92 91.40 x818 Police Services 2,500.00 156.00 465.00 2,035.00 18.60 819 Jail Services 35,000.00 1,127.00 9,972.00 25,028.00 28.49 3823 Special Event Security/Police 30,000.00 0.00 23,486.00 6,514.00 78.29 3825 Public Notice Posting 51.00 0.00 34.00 17.00 66.67 3827 Library Grounds Maintenance 8,912.00 0.00 8,912.00 0.00 100.00 3831 Street Cut Inspection 44,000.00 7,774.00 29,133.00 14,867.00 66.21 3833 Recreation Service Charges 5,000.00 647.00 2,106.19 2,893.81 42.12 3834 Encroachment Permit 120,000.00 10,784.24 67,092.35 52,907.65 55.91 3837 Returned Check Charge 1,000.00 120.00 570.00 430.00 57.00 3838 Sale Of Maps/Publications 150.00 14.00 92.6457.36 61.76 3839 Photocopy Charges 700.00 136.20 376.45 323.55 53.78 3840 Ambulance Transport 146,000.00 13,778.57 85,470.57 60,529.43 58.54 3841 Police Towing 30,000.00 6,255.00 17,820.00 12,180.00 59.40 3857 Parking Plan Application 3,525.00 1,175.00 4,700.00 -1,175.00 133.33 •859 Refuse Lien Fee/B.F.I. 0.00 0.00 -245.21 245.21 0.00 3862 Alarm Permit Fee 800.00 76.00 380.00 420.00 47.50 3863 False Alarm Fee 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 3866 Nonconforming Remodels 6,848.00 856.00 5,136.00 1,712.00 75.00 3867 Precise Development Plans 29,240.002,924.00 14,620.00 14,620.00 50.00 3868 Public Noticing/300 Ft Radius 27,896.00 3,170.00 12,680.0015,216.00 45.45 3869 2nd Party Response 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 3870 Legal Determination Hearing 1,274.00 1,274.00 1,274.00 0.00 100.00 3875 Spray Booth Inspection (Annual) 359.00 0.00 0.00359.00 0.00 Page: 4 • • revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3878 Reinspection Fee 1,680.00 224.00 224.00 1,456.00 13.33 3882 Spec Event Security/Fire 5,000.00 0.00 1,781.00 3,219.00 35.62 3883 FlnaVTentative Map Extension 861.00 0.00 287.00 574.00 33.33 I887 Voluntary Lot Merger 408.00 0.00 0.00 408.00 0.00 888 Planning Commission Appeals 2,532.00 0.00 1,688.00 844.00 66.67 3890 300 Ft Radius Noticing/Appeal to CC 3,740.00 374.00 1,208.00 2,532.00 32.30 3893 Contract Recreation Classes 250,000.00 69,972.00 174,683.63 75,316.37 69.87 3894 Other Recreation Programs 45,000.00 -58,231.00 48,190.47 -3,190.47 107.09 3897 Admin Fee/TULIP Ins Certificate 350.00 -124.19224.28 125.72 64.08 3899 C.U.P. Minor Amendment 236.00 0.00 0.00 236.00 0.00 Total Current Service Charges 1,067,390.00 102,658.08 688,343.67 379,046.33 64.49 3900 Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 500.00 0.00 199.00 301.00 39.80 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 0.00 -178.27 178.27 0.00 3903 Contributions Non Govt 5,000.00 3,515.00 62,280.00 -57,280.00 1245.60 3904 General Miscellaneous 0.00 516.66 4,683.39 -4,683.39 0.00 0909 Late Fee 100.00 -6,134.00 201.59 -101.59 201.59 3935 Use Of PERS Excess Assets 328,492.00 27,931.43 160,726.74 167,765.26 48.93 3945 InSery Firefighter Tmg Prog/El Camino 18,207.00 6,134.00 6,134.00 12,073.00 33.69 3955 Operating Transfers In 2,037,937.00 169,828.00 1,018,968.00 1,018,969.00 50.00 Total Other Revenue 2,390,236.00 201,791.09 1,253,014.45 1,137,221.55 52.42 Total General Fund 18,176,110.00 3,039,318.94 8,291,253.21 9,884,856.79 45.62 Page: 5 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 6 105 Liphtp/Landscapg Dist Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Seared 447,000.00 181,799.70 181,799.70 265,200.30 40.67 •03 Prior Year Collections 12,000.00 0.00 3,708.41 8,291.59 30.90 3105 Assessment Rebates -3,100.00 -73.83 492.20 -2,607.80 15.88 Total Taxes 455,900.00 181,725.87 185,015.91 270,884.09 40.58 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 4,332.00 0.00 481.30 3,850.70 11.11 3475 Investment Premium -147.00 -3.23 -54.11 -92.89 36.81 Total Use Of Money & Property 4,185.00 -3.23 427.19 3,757.81 10.21 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In Total Other Revenue 7,781.00 3,891.00 3,891.00 3,890.00 50.01 7,781.00 3,891.00 3,891.00 3,890.00 50.01 Total tightgllandscapg Dist Fund 467,866.00 185,613.64 189,334.10 278,531.90 40.47 Page: 6 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 7 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 16,690.00 0.00 5,125.04 11,564.96 30.71 3420 Other Interest Income 15,898.00 1,326.81 8,013.40 7,884.60 50.41 025 Ground Lease 21,000.00 1,750.00 10,500.00 10,500.00 50.00 3475 Investment Premium -565.00 -80.66 -425.60 -139.40 75.33 Total Use Of Money & Property 53,023.00 2,996.15 23,212.84 29,810.16 43.78 3800 Current Service Charges 3815 Public Works Services 3,900.00 0.00 2,675.00 1,225.00 68.59 3844 Lot A Revenue 302,000.00 17,736.00 126,485.25 175,514.75 41.88 3846 North Pier Parking Structure Revenue 676,500.00 35,064.00 309,077.75 367,422.25 45.69 Total Current Service Charges 982,400.00 52,800.00 438,238.00 544,162.00 44.61 3900 Other Revenue 3903 Contributions Non Govt 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 -10,000.00 0.00 3955 Operating Transfers In 1,285.00 643.00 643.00 642.00 50.04 Total Other Revenue 1,285.00 643.00 10,643.00 -9,358.00 828.25 • Total Downtown Enhancement Fund 1,036,708.00 56,439.15 472,093.84 564,614.16 45.54 Page: 7 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 8 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 110 Parking Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3302 Court Fines/Parking 1,193,135.00 90,455.00 617,085.50 576,049.50 51.72 • Total Fines & Forfeitures 1,193,135.00 90,455.00 617,085.50 576,049.50 51.72 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property 6,691.00 0.00 2,857.82 3,833.18 42.71 -226.00 -28.75 -193.49 -32.51 85.62 6,465.00 -28.75 2,664.33 3,800.67 41.21 3800 Current Service Charges 3842 Parking Meters 1,344,584.00 36,769.11 623,775.28 720,808.72 46.39 3843 Parking Permits/Annual 290,000.00 1,438.00 23,493.00 266,507.00 8.10 3844 Daily Parking Permits 578.00 42.00 450.00 128.00 77.85 3848 Driveway Pernits 400.00 108.00 257.00 143.00 64.25 3849 Guest Permits 1,600.00 136.00 1,182.00 418.00 73.88 3850 Contractors Permits 9,000.00 1,107.00 6,453.00 2,547.00 71.70 051 Cash Key Revenue 1,310.00 120.002,080.00 -770.00 158.78 Total Current Service Charges 1,647,472.00 39,720.11 657,690.28 989,781.72 39.92 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In Total Other Revenue 21,570.00 10,785.00 10,785.00 10,785.00 50.00 21,570.00 10,785.00 10,785.00 10,785.00 50.00 Total Parking Fund 2,868,642.00 140,931.36 1,288,225.11 1,580,416.89 44.91 Page: 8 • revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 9 115 State Gas Tax Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,936.00 0.00 93.73 1,842.27 4.84 3475 Investment Premium -66.00 -1.37 -40.39 -25.61 61.20 0 Total Use Of Money & Property 1,870.00 -1.37 53.34 1,816.66 2.85 3500 Intergovemmental/State 3501 Section 2108 Allocation 76,257.00 11 558 53 37,916.12 38,340.88 49.72 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 158,646.00 25,116.26 82,178.99 76,467.01 51.80 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 100.00 3512 Section 2105 (Prop 111) 118,248.00 18,605.55 60,922.64 57,325.36 51.52 Total Intergovernmental/State 357,151.00 55,280.34 185,017.75 172,133.25 51.80 Total State Gas Tax Fund 359,021.00 55,278.97 185,071.09 173,949.91 51.55 • Page: 9 revstat.rpt 02/0212004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 10 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 117 AB939 Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Pret Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 9,037.00 0.00 2,819.60 6,217.40 31.20 1075 Investment Premium -306.00 -42.86 -187.30 -118.70 61.21 Total Use Of Money & Property 8,731.00 -42.86 2,632.30 6,098.70 30.15 3800 Current Service Charges 3860 AB939 Surcharge Total Current Service Charges 59,020.00 4,892.50 24,481.43 34,538.57 41.48 59,020.00 4,892.50 24,481.43 34,538.57 41.48 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In 236.00 118.00 118.00 118.00 50.00 Total Other Revenue 236.00 118.00 118.00 118.00 50.00 Total AB939 Fund 67,987.00 4,967.64 27,231.73 40,755.27 40.05 Page: 10 • • . revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 11 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/112003 through 12131/2003 120 County Gas Tax Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money 8. Property 3401 Interest Income 33.00 0.00 0.58 32.42 1.76 Total County Gas Tax Fund 33.00 0.00 0.58 32.42 1.76 • Page: 11 revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page: 12 02/02/2004 5:41PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 121 Prop A Open Space Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3600 Intergovernmental/County 3606 LA Co Parks/Pier Renovation 141,723.00 0.00 0.00 141,723.00 0.00 *08 Maintenance Allocation 20,557.00 0.00 0.00 20,557.00 0.00 Total Prop A Open Space Fund 162,280.00 0.00 0.00 162,280.00 0.00 Page: 12 . revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page: 13 02/02/2004 5:41PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 122 Tyco Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 44,791.00 0.00 12,137.77 32,653.23 27.10 3426 Easement Agreement 275,000.00 0.00 0.00 275,000.00 0.00 075 Investment Premium -1,516.00 -185.85 -984.84-531.16 64.96 Total Tyco Fund 316,275.00 -185.85 11,152.93 307,122.07 3.50 • Page: 13 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 14 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund Account Number 3100 Taxes 3116 Parks & Recreation Facility Tax • Total Taxes 3400 Use Of Money & Property Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3,500.00 3,500.00 7,000.00 -3,500.00 200.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 7,000.00 -3,500.00 200.00 3401 Interest Income 14,111.00 0.00 1,247.97 12,863.03 8.84 3475 Investment Premium 477.00 -17.62 -102.71 -374.29 21.53 Total Use Of Money & Property 13,634.00 -17.62 1,145.26 12,488.74 8.40 3900 Other Revenue 3910 Park/Recreation In Ueu Fee Total Other Revenue Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund • 117,128.00 -3,604.00 13,584.50 103,543.50 11.60 117,128.00 -3,604.00 13,584.50 103,543.50 11.60 134,262.00 -121.62 21,729.76 112,532.24 16.18 Page: 14 • revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1211/2003 through 12/31/2003 126 4% Utility Users Tax Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money 8 Property 3401 Interest Income 7,742.00 0.00 254.01 7,487.99 3.28 3475 Investment Premium -262.00 -2.99 -24.09 -237.91 9.19 • Total 4% Utility Users Tax Fund 7,480.00 -2.99 229.92 7,250.08 3.07 • Page: 15 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 16 127 Building' Improvement Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 354.00 0.00 31.70 322.30 8.95 •75 Investment Premium -13.00 -0.39 -2.58 -10.42 19.85 Total Building Improvement Fund 341.00 -0.39 29.12 311.88 8.54 Page: 16 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 17 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 136 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund Account Number 3900 Other Revenue Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Pitt Revenues Balance Rcvd 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 2,775.00 2,806.70 2,806.70 -31.70 101.14 Total Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 2,775.00 2,806.70 2,806.70 -31.70 101.14 • • Page: 17 revstat.rpt 02/0212004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 18 137 Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Revd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 150.00 0.00 35.69 114.31 23.79 • Total Use Of Money & Properly 150.00 0.00 35.69 114.31 23.79 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 8,629.00 9,083.13 9,083.13 -454.13 105.26 Total Other Revenue 8,629.00 9,083.13 9,083.13 -454.13 105.26 Total Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund 8,779.00 9,083.13 9,118.82 -339.82 103.87 Page: 18 • revstat-rpt Revenue Status Report 02/02/2004 5:41PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/112003 through 12/3112003 Page: 19 138 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund Adjusted Account Number Estimate 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Total Use Of Money & Property •900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees Total Other Revenue Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund • Revenues Year-to-date Pitt Revenues Balance Rcvd 202.00 0.00 47.09 154.91 23.31 202.00 0.00 47.09 154.91 23.31 9,563.00 9,919.96 9,919.96 -356.96 103.73 9,563.00 9,919.96 9,919.96 -356.96 103.73 9,765.00 9,919.96 9,967.05 -202.05 102.07 Page: 19 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 20 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 140 Community Dev Block Grant Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Revd 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal 3715 CDBG Administration 11,609.00 4,361.00 4,361.00 7,248.00 37.57 41120 Americans with Disabilities Act 270,665.00 0.00 0.00 270,665.00 0.00 3722 Community Center Theatre Phase! 112,274.00 9,181.00 9,181.00 103,093.00 8.18 3723 Community Center Theatre/Phase 11 104,500.00 0.00 0.00 104,500.00 0.00 Total Community Dev Block Grant 499,048.00 13,542.0013,542.00 485,506.00 2.71 Page: 20 • revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 21 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 145 Proposition A Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3117 Proposition A Transit 265,406.00 23,803.88 107,626.01 157,779.99 40.55 3121 Subregional Incentives 29,584.00 0.00 10,679.46 18,904.54 36.10 • Total Taxes 294,990.00 23,803.88 118,305.47 176,684.53 40.10 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3475 Investment Premium 4,155.00 0.00 1,080.98 3,074.02 26.02 -141.00 -15.28 -82.12 -58.88 58.24 Total Use Of Money & Property 4,014.00 -15.28 998.86 3,015.14 24.88 3800 Current Service Charges 3853 Dial -A -Taxi Program 3854 Fares, Dial -A -Ride 3855 Bus Passes Total Current Service Charges Total Proposition A Fund 3,000.00 350.00 1,961.00 1,039.00 65.37 11,250.00 0.00 2,807.65 8,442.35 24.96 300.00 14.40 81.60 218.40 27.20 14,550.00 364.40 4,850.25 9,699.75 33.34 313,554.00 24,153.00 124,154.58 189,399.42 39.60 Page: 21 revstat.rpt 02102/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 22 146 Proposition C Fund Account Number 3100 Taxes 3118 Proposition C Local Return • Total Taxes Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 217,781.00 19,745.12 89,277.04 128,503.96 40.99 217,781.00 19,745.12 89,277.04 128,503.96 40.99 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 15,583.00 0.00 5,154.57 10,428.43 33.08 3475 Investment Premium -528.00 -79.69 403.39 -124.61 76.40 Total Use Of Money & Property 15,055.00 -79.69 4,751.18 10,303.82 31.56 Total Proposition C Fund 232,836.00 19,665.43 94,028.22 138,807.78 40.38 Page: 22 . revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 23 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 150 Grants Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3529 Wildlife Conservation Grant 324,000.00 0.00 0.00 324,000.00 0.00 3558 Beverage Recycling Grant 5,406.00 0.00 5,406.00 0.00 100.00 0562 State Homeland Security Grant Program 25,683.00 0.00 0.00 25,683.00 0.00 Total IntergovemmentaVState 355,089.00 0.00 5,406.00 349,683.00 1.52 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal 3738 Local Law Enf Block Grant Prog-LLEBG 11,450.00 0.00 .. 11,450.00 0.00 100.00 Total IntergovemmentaVFederal 11,450.00 0.00 11,450.00 0.00 100.00 Total Grants Fund 366,539.00 0.00 16,856.00 349,683.00 4.60 • Page: 23 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 24 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 151 Ofc of Traffic Sftv Grant Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3500 IntergovemmentaVState 3560 Be Street Smart Hermosa Grant 18,000.00 -1,401.26 4,408.93 13,591.07 24.49 Total Ofc of Traffic SR), Grant Fund 18,000.00 -1,401.26 4,408.93 13,591.07 24.49 Page: 24 revstat.rpt 02/0212004 5:41 PM Revenue Status Report Page: 25 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/112003 through 12/31/2003 152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,096.00 0.00 8.08 1,087.92 0.74 3475 Investment Premium -38.00 0.00 -3.11 -34.89 8.18 0 Total Use Of Money & Property 1,058.00 0.00 4.97 1,053.03 0.47 3500 Intergovemmental/State 3538 AOMD Emission Control AB2766 22,000.00 -85.11 5,609.01 16,390.99 25.50 Total Intergovemmentai/State 22,000.00 -85.11 5,609.01 16,390.99 25.50 Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 23,058.00 -85.11 5,613.98 17,444.02 24.35 • Page: 25 revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page: 26 02/02/2004 5:41PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 1213112003 153 Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) Account Number 3100 Taxes 3135 C.O.P.S. Allocation • Total Taxes 3400 Use Of Money & Property Adjusted Estimate Revenues 100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 3401 Interest Income 2,764.00 0.00 625.49 2,138.51 22.63 3475 Investment Premium -94.00 -9.22 -60.01 -33.99 63.84 Total Use Of Money & Property 2,670.00 -9.22 565.48 2,104.52 21.18 Total Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) 102,670.00 -9.22 100,565.48 2,104.52 97.95 • Page: 26 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 27 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 154 CA Law Enf Equip Prop Fund (CLEEP) Account Number 3400 Use Of Money 8 Property 3401 Interest Income 3475 Investment Premium 1 • Total CA Law Enf Equip Prog Fund (CLEEP) Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 1,662.00 0.00 292.16 1,369.84 17.58 -56.00 -4.39 -25.19 -30.81 44.98 1,606.00 -4.39 266.97 1,339.03 16.62 Page: 27 revstat.rpt 02102/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 28 156 Taskforce for Rea Autotheft Prev (TRAP) Account Number 3600 IntergovemmentaVCounty 3620 T.RAP. Taskforce Reimbursement • 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue Total Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prev (TRAP) Total IntergovemmentaVCounty Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 148,200.00 0.00 0.00 148,200.00 0.00 148,200.00 0.00 0.00 148,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 148,200.00 0.00 0.00 148,200.00 0.00 Page: 28 revstat.rpt 02/0212004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 29 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1211/2003 through 12131/2003 160 Sewer Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Revd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 84,956.00 0.00 12,650.94 72,305.06 14.89 3475 Investment Premium -2,877.00 -147.44 -1,078.23 -1,798.77 37.48 • Total Use Of Money & Property 82,079.00 -147.44 11,572.71 70,506.29 14.10 3500 IntergovemmentaVState 3550 CA Waste Oil Recycling Grant 5,419.00 4,877.10 4,877.10 541.90 90.00 Total IntergovemmentaVState 5,419.00 4,877.10 4,877.10 541.90 90.00 3600 IntergovemmentaVCounty 3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance Total IntergovemmentaVCounty 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 3800 Current Service Charges 3828 Sewer Connection Fee 7,670.00 901.48 5,078.99 2,591.01 66.22 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 6,000.00 1,528.00 4,011.00 1,989.00 66.85 3832 Sewer lateral Installation 7,000.00 764.00 3,820.00 3,180.00 54.57 • Total Current Service Charges 20,670.00 3,193.48 12,909.99 7,760.01 62.46 3900 Other Revenue 3917 Adopt -A -Storm Drain Donation 3955 Operating Transfers In Total Other Revenue Total Sewer Fund 4,000.00 0.00 3,680.00 320.00 92.00 716,622.00 66,648.00 358,333.00 358,289.00 50.00 720,622.00 66,648.00 362,013.00 358,609.00 50.24 831,290.00 74,571.14 391,372.80 439,917.20 47.08 Page: 29 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 30 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 170 Asset SeizurelForft Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Pitt Revenues Balance Revd 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3304 State Forfeited Funds 0.00 0.00 88.96 -88.96 0.00 Department of Justice Forfeited Funds 0.00 0.00 780.47 -780.47 0.00 Total Fines & Forfeitures 0.00 0.00 869.43 -869.43 0.00 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 4,075.00 0.00 1,141.67 2,933.33 28.02 3475 Investment Premium -138.00 -17.03 -90.78 -47.22 65.78 Total Use Of Money & Property 3,937.00 -17.03 1,050.89 2,886.11 26.69 Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 3,937.00 -17.03 1,920.32 2,016.68 48.78 Page: 30 revstat.rpt 0210212004 5:41 PM Revenue Status Report Page: 31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 1213112003 180 Fire Protection Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 10,926.00 0.00 3,128.62 7,797.38 28.63 3475 Investment Premium -370.00 45.13 -244.33 -125.67 66.04 • Total Use Of Money & Property 10,556.00 45.13 2,884.29 7,671.71 27.32 3900 Other Revenue 3912 Fire Flow Fee 67,200.00 5,433.00 41,409.00 25,791.00 61.62 Total Other Revenue 67,200.00 5,433.00 41,409.00 25,791.00 61.62 Total Fire Protection Fund 77,756.00 5,387.87 44,293.29 33,462.71 56.96 • Page: 31 revstat.rpt 02/0212004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12131/2003 Page: 32 199 Contingency Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 52,437.00 0.00 16,657.42 35,779.58 31.77 .5 Investment Premium -1,776.00 -301.35 -1,368.41 407.59 77.05 Total Contingency Fund 50,661.00 -301.35 15,289.01 35,371.99 30.18 Page: 32 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/112003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 33 301 Capital Improvement Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 47,848.00 0.00 11,310.25 36,537.75 23.64 3475 Investment Premium -1,621.00 -218.95 -1,002.01 -618.99 61.81 • Total Use Of Money & Property 46,227.00 -218.95 10,308.24 35,918.76 22.30 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In Total Other Revenue Total Capital Improvement Fund • 275,000.00 22,917.00 137,502.00 137,498.00 50.00 275,000.00 22,917.00 137,502.00 137,498.00 50.00 321 227 00 22,698.05 147,810.24 173,416.76 46.01 Page: 33 revstat.rpt 02/0212004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1211/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 34 302 Artesia Blvd Relinquishment Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 11,707.00 0.00 3,475.23 8,231.77 29.69 41,5 Investment Premium -396.00 -52.39 -272.00 -124.00 68.69 Total Artesia Blvd Relinquishment 11,311.00 -52.39 3,203.23 8,107.77 28.32 Page: 34 revstat.rpt 02/0212004 5:41 PM Revenue Status Report Page: 35 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1211/2003 through 12/3112003 305 Lwr Pier Assmnt Dist Impr Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,587.00 0.00 466.86 1,120.14 29.42 3475 Investment Premium -53.00 -7.10 -36.87 -16.13 69.57 • Total Lwr Pier Assmnt Dist Impr Fund 1,534.00 -7.10 429.99 1,104.01 28.03 • Page: 35 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41 PM Revenue Status Report Page: 36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 307 Myrtle Util Undrarnd Impr Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 436.00 0.00 31.70 404.30 7.27 .5 Investment Premium -15.00 -0.47 -3.85 -11.15 25.67 Total Myrtle Util Undrgmd lmpr Fund 421.00 -0.47 27.85 393.15 6.62 Page: 36 • revstat.rpt 02/0212004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 37 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 121112003 through 12131/2003 308 Loma Util Undrgrnd Improv Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3475 Investment Premium • Total Loma Util Undrgrnd Improv Fund • Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 2,229.00 0.00 665.18 1,563.82 29.84 -74.00 -9.98 -51.79 -22.21 69.99 2,155.00 -9.98 613.39 1,541.61 28.46 Page: 37 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 38 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 610 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income • Total Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 326.00 0.00 38.90 287.10 11.93 326.00 0.00 38.90 287.10 11.93 Page: 38 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/112003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 39 617 Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income • • Adjusted Estimate 1,265.00 Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 0.00 201.67 1,063.33 15.94 Total Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund 1,265.00 0.00 201.67 1,063.33 15.94 Page: 39 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 40 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 618 Loma Drive Assessment Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Adjusted Estimate 1,286.00 Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 0.00 178.82 1,107.18 13.91 • Total Loma Drive Assessment Fund 1,286.00 0.00 178.82 1,107.18 13.91 Page: 40 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 41 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 705 Insurance Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Revd 3800 Current Service Charges 3880 Insurance Service Charges 1,412,810.00 117,734.00 706,404.00 706,406.00 50.00 Total Current Service Charges 1,412,810.00 117,734.00 706,404.00 706,406.00 50.00 •900 Other Revenue 3902 RefundslReimb Previous Years 0.00 2,000.00 13,658.35 -13,658.35 0.00 3904 General Miscellaneous 0.00 0.00 1,225.00 -1,225.00 0.00 3955 Operating Transfers In 2,552.00 1,276.00 1,276.00 1,276.00 50.00 Total Other Revenue 2,552.00 3,276.00 16,159.35 -13,607.35 633.20 Total Insurance Fund 1,415,362.00 121,010.00 722,563.35 692,798.65 51.05 • Page: 41 revstat.rpt 0210212004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 42 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues - Balance Rcvd 3800 Current Service Charges 3885 Computer/Business Machine Charges 483,259.00 40,272.00 241,632.00 241,627.00 50.00 09 Equipment Replacement Charges 682,652.00 56,854.00 341,124.00 341,528.00 49.97 Total Current Service Charges 1,165,911.00 97,126.00 582,756.00 583,155.00 49.98 3900 Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 10,000.00 0.00 7,412.50 2,587.50 74.13 3955 Operating Transfers In 27,331.00 5,411.00 10,129.00 17,202.00 37.06 Total Other Revenue 37,331.00 5,411.00 17,541.50 19,789.50 46.99 Total Equipment Replacement Fund Grand Total 1,203,242.00 102,537.00 600,297.50 602,944.50 49.89 29,247,608.00 3,885,724.83 12,795,920.48 16,451,687.52 43.75 Page: 42 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 43 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Account Number Recap Report Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Prot Balance Rcvd 001 General Fund 18,176,110.00 3,072,795.35 8,324,729.62 9,851,380.38 45.80 105 Ughtg/Landscapg Dist Fund 467,866.00 185,613.64 189,334.10 278,531.90 40.47 •09 Downtown Enhancement Fund 1,036,708.00 56,439.15 472,093.84 564,614.16 45.54 110 Parking Fund 2,868,642.00 140,931.36 1,288,225.11 1,580,416.89 44.91 115 State Gas Tax Fund 359,021.00 55,278.97 185,071.09 173,949.91 51.55 117 AB939 Fund 67,987.00 4,967.64 27,231.73 40,755.27 40.05 120 County Gas Tax Fund 33.00 0.00 0.58 32.42 1.76 121 Prop A Open Space Fund 162,280.00 0.00 0.00 162,280.00 0.00 622 Tyco Fund 318,275.00 -185.85 11,152.93 307,122.07 3.50 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 134,262.00 -121.62 21,729.76 112,532.24 16.18 126 4% Utility Users Tax Fund 7,480.00 -2.99 229.92 7,250.08 3.07 127 Building Improvement Fund 341.00 -0.39 29.12 311.88 8.54 Page: 43 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 44 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Account Number Recap Report Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Prct Balance Rcvd 136 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 2,775.00 2,806.70 2,806.70 -31.70 101.14 al7 Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund 8,779.00 9,083.13 9,118.82 -339.82 103.87 138 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 9,765.00 9,919.96 9,967.05 -202.05 102.07 140 Community Dev Block Grant 499,048.00 13,542.00 13,542.00 485,506.00 2.71 145 Proposition A Fund 313,554.00 24,153.00 124,154.58 189,399.42 39.60 146 Proposition C Fund 232,836.00 19,665.43 - 94,028.22 138,807.78 40.38 150 Grants Fund 366,539.00 0.00 16,856.00 349,683.00 4.60 151 Ofc of Traffic Sfty Grant Fund 18,000.00 -1,401.26 4,408.93 13,591.07 24.49 Ile 152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 23,058.00 -85.11 5,613.98 17,444.02 24.35 153 Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) ' 102,670.00 -9.22 100,565.48 2,104.52 97.95 154 CA Law Enf Equip Prog Fund (CLEEP) 1,606.00 -4.39 266.97 1,339.03 16.62 156 Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prev (TRAP) 148,200.00 0.00 0.00 148,200.00 0.00 Page: 44 • - revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 45 Account Number Recap Report Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Prot Balance Rcvd 160 Sewer Fund 831,290.00 74,571.14 391,372.80 439,917.20 47.08 170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 3,937.00 -17.03 1,920.32 2,016.68 48.78 •180 Fire Protection Fund 77,756.00 5,387.87 44,293.29 33,462.71 56.96 199 Contingency Fund 50,661.00 -301.35 15,289.01 35,371.99 30.18 301 Capital Improvement Fund 321,227.00 22,698.05 147,810.24 173,416.76 46.01 302 Artesia Blvd Relinquishment 11,311.00 -52.39 3,203.23 8,107.77 28.32 305 Lwr Pier Assmnt Dist Impr Fund 1,534.00 -7.10 429.99 1,104.01 28.03 307 Myrtle Util Undrgmd Impr Fund 421.00 -0.47 27.85 393.15 6.62 008 Loma UtiI Undrgmd Improv Fund 2,155.00 -9.98 613.39 1,541.61 28.46 610 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund 326.00 0.00 38.90 287.10 11.93 617 Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund 1,265.00 0.00 201.67 1,063.33 15.94 618 Loma Drive Assessment Fund 1,286.00 0.00 178.82 1,107.18 13.91 Page: 45 revstat.rpt 02/02/2004 5:41PM Revenue Status Report Page: 46 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Prct Account Number Estimate Revenues Revenues Balance Rcvd 705 Insurance Fund 1,415,362.00 121,010.00 722,563.35 692,798.65 51.05 • Equipment Replacement Fund 1,203,242.00 102,537.00 600,297.50 602,944.50 49.89 900 Investment Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grand Total 29,247,608.00 3,919,201.24 12,829,396.89 16,418,211.11 43.86 Page: 46 ' expstat.rpt 0210312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report Page: 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 001 General Fund Account Number 1101 City Council •11014100 Personal Services 1101-4102 Regular Salaries 1101-4111 Accrual Cash In 1101-4112 PartTime/Temporary 1101-4180 Retirement 1101-4188 Employee Benefits 11014189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 11014200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 29,652.00 0.00 39,000.00 3,570.00 34,834.00 995.00 108,051.00 2,470.51 0.00 3,313.39 301.32 3,043.24 83.80 9,212.26 11014201 Contract Serv/Private 6,000.00 200.00 Total Contract Services 6,000.00 200.00 11014300 Materials/Supplies/Other 11014304 Telephone 11014305 Office Oper Supplies 11014309 Maintenance Materials 11013315 Membership le 11014317 Conference/Training 11014319 Special Events 11014396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total City Council 1121 City Clerk 11214100 Personal Services 11214102 Regular Salaries 11214111 Accrual Cash In 11214112 PartTime/Temporary 175.00 6,000.00 600.00 20,000.00 12,000.00 16,500.00 5,943.00 61,218.00 2.05 55.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,950.00 495.00 3,502.38 14,823.03 342.07 19,563.39 1,788.57 17,528.80 504.03 54,549.89 1,188.47 1,188.47 17.35 3,575.89 0.00 11,129.36 1,646.78 11,910.95 2,970.00 31,250.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,828.97 -342.07 19,436.61 1,781.43 17,305.20 490.97 53,501.11 49.99 0.00 50.16 50.10 50.32 50.66 50.49 4,311.53 28.14 4,311.53 28.14 157.65 2,424.11 600.00 8,870.64 10,353.22 4,589.05 2,973.00 29,967.67 9.91 59.60 0.00 55.65 13.72 72.19 49.97 51.05 175,269.00 12,914.64 86,988.69 500.00 87,780.31 49.92 76,176.00 3,580.00 27,648.00 6,347.76 0.00 2,304.00 38,012.34 349.98 19,008.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,163.66 3,230.02 8,640.00 49.90 9.78 68.75 Page: 1 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/112003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 2 001 General Fund Account Number 11213180 Retirement 11214188 Employee Benefits 1121-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services .1213200 Contract Services 11214201 Contract Serv/Private 11214251 Contract Services/Govt Total Contract Services 11214300 Materials/Supplies/Other 11214304 Telephone 11214305 Office Oper Supplies 1121-4315 Membership 1121-4317 Conference/Training 11214323 Public Noticing 1121-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 11214396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1121-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 1121-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 • Total Equipment/Fumiture Total City Clerk • 1131 City Attorney 11314200 Contract Services 11314201 Contract Serv/Private Total City Attorney 1132 City Prosecutor 11324100 Personal Services Adjusted Appropriation 7,777.00 17,422.00 1,581.00 134,184.00 6,544.00 50,000.00 56,544.00 300.00 5,500.00 405.00 4,650.00 10,500.00 18,676.00 4,831.00 44,862.00 Year-to-date Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances 648.06 3,882.79 1,521.29 8,755.48 125.61 832.68 10,946.72 70,841.27 1,073.11 2,700.00 3,773.11 34.03 384.90 165.00 674.70 878.75 1,556.00 403.00 4,096.38 1,926.26 0.00 1,926.26 125.13 2,219.83 380.00 725.76 4,578.08 9,336.00 2,418.00 19,782.80 Prct Balance Used 0.00 3,894.21 49.93 0.00 8,666.52 50.26 0.00 748.32 52.67 0.00 63,342.73 52.79 0.00 4,617.74 29.44 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 54,617.74 3.41 0.00 174.87 41.71 0.00 3,280.17 40.36 0.00 25.00 93.83 0.00 3,924.24 15.61 0.00 5,921.92 43.60 0.00 9,340.00 49.99 0.00 2,413.00 50.05 0.00 25,079.20 44.10 700.00 212.18 212.18 0.00 487.82 30.31 700.00 212.18 212.18 0.00 487.82 30.31 236,290.00 180,000.00 180,000.00 19,028.39 22,185.47 22,185.47 92,762.51 61,858.53 61,858.53 0.00 143,527.49 39.26 0.00 118,141.47 34.37 0.00 118,141.47 34.37 • Page: 2 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 3 001 General Fund Account Number 1132-4188 Employee Benefits Total Personal Services 11324200 Contract Services 132-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 11324300 Materials/Supplies/Other 11324304 Telephone 1132-4305 Office Oper Supplies 11324315 Membership 11324317 Conference/Training Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total City Prosecutor 1141 City Treasurer 11414100 Personal Services 11414102 11414106 11414111 • 1414112 11414180 11414188 11414189 Regular Salaries Regular Overtime Accrual Cash In Part Time/remporary Retirement Employee Benefits Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 11414200 Contract Services 11414201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 11414300 Materials/Supplies/Other Adjusted Appropriation 4,479.00 4,479.00 143,400.00 143,400.00 125.00 600.00 100.00 1,250.00 2,075.00 149,954.00 22,944.00 110.00 51.00 15,912.00 2,911.00 11,272.00 564.00 53,764.00 22,584.00 22,584.00 11414304 Telephone 821.00 Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures 382.36 382.36 2,450.00 2,450.00 12.40 0.00 100.00 0.00 112.40 2,944.76 1,943.01 0.00 0.00 1,325.50 244.80 988.75 47.43 4,549.49 291.67 291.67 2,202.76 2,202.76 42,041.85 42,041.85 48.72 0.00 150.00 133.56 332.28 44,576.89 11,239.54 0.00 0.00 7,953.00 1,437.50 5,658.30 278.52 26,566.86 5,115.47 5,115.47 Year-to-date Encumbrances 0.00 0.00 5,550.00 5,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Prct Balance Used 2,276.24 49.18 2,276.24 49.18 95,808.15 33.19 95,808.15 33.19 76.28 600.00 -50.00 1,116.44 1,742.72 38.98 0.00 150.00 10.68 16.01 99,827.11 33.43 11,704.46 110.00 51.00 7,959.00 1,473.50 5,613.70 285.48 27,197.14 48.99 0.00 0.00 49.98 49.38 50.20 49.38 49.41 17,468.53 22.65 17,468.53 22.65 99.23 366.51 0.00 454.49 44.64 Page: 3 expstat.rpt 02103/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 4 001 General Fund Account Number 11414305 Office Oper Supplies 11414315 Membership 1141-4317 Conference/Training 11414390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 11414396 Insurance User Charges IDTotal Materials/Supplies/Other Total City Treasurer 1201 City Manager 12014100 Personal Services 12014102 Regular Salaries 12014111 Acaual Cash In 12014180 Retirement 12014188 Employee Benefits 12014189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 12014200 Contract Services 12014201 Contract Sew/Private Total Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 2,240.00 120.00 1,123.00 8,595.00 2,224.00 15,123.00 136.67 0.00 0.00 716.00 185.00 1,136.90 1,265.45 0.00 367.50 4,296.00 1,110.00 7,405.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 974.55 56.49 120.00 0.00 755.50 32.72 4,299.00 49.98 1,114.00 49.91 7,717.54 48.97 91,471.00 5,978.06 39,087.79 0.00 52,383.21 42.73 179,967.00 13,108.00 13,062.00 21,777.00 2,620.00 230,534.00 13,885.28 0.00 1,005.17 1,851.53 202.26 16,944.24 83,311.65 6,550.22 6,031.04 10,883.87 1,308.49 108,085.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 96,655.35 6,557.78 7,030.96 10,893.13 1,311.51 122,448.73 46.29 49.97 46.17 49.98 49.94 48.88 2,725.00 0.00 1,345.00 575.00 805.00 70.46 2,725.00 0.00 1,345.00 575.00 805.00 70.46 12014300 Materials/Supplies/Other 001.4304 Telephone 1,000.00 110.11 425.38 0.00 574.62 42.54 12014305 Office Oper Supplies 1,500.00 156.75 377.38 0.00 1,122.62 25.16 12014315 Membership 1,500.00 0.00 1,254.00 0.00 246.00 83.60 12014317 Conference/Training 5,500.00 -55.00 1,275.70 0.00 4,224.30 23.19 12014390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 13,467.00 1,122.00 6,732.00 0.00 6,735.00 49.99 12014396 Insurance User Charges 8,877.00 740.00 4,440.00 0.00 4,437.00 50.02 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 31,844.00 2,073.86 14,504.46 0.00 17,339.54 45.55 Total City Manager 265,103.00 19,018.10 123,934.73 575.00 140,593.27 46.97 1202 Finance Administration Page: 4 • expstat.rpt • 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report Page: 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1211/2003 through 12/31/2003 001 General Fund Account Number 1202-4100 Personal Services 1202-4102 Regular Salaries 1202-4106 Regular Overtime •2024111 Accrual Cash In 12024180 Retirement 12024188 Employee Benefits 12024189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1202-4200 Contract Services 1202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1202-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 12024300 MaterialslSupplies/Other 12024304 Telephone 12024305 Office Oper Supplies 12024315 Membership 12024317 Conference/Training 12024390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 1202-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 12024396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 323,034.00 550.00 18,998.00 23,928.00 40,810.00 2,290.00 409,610.00 109,968.00 2,987.00 112,955.00 2,200.00 9,763.00 330.00 5,729.00 48,219.00 5,608.00 16,538.00 88,387.00 25,858.49 0.00 319.47 1,914.55 3,491.76 194.54 31,778.81 5,487.50 0.00 5,487.50 250.00 685.60 0.00 392.35 4,018.00 467.00 1,378.00 7,190.95 163,729.70 0.00 13,931.40 12,129.86 20,324.33 1,173.74 211,289.03 45,604.50 2,986.62 48,591.12 934.42 4,866.32 310.00 3,667.39 24,108.00 2,802.00 8,268.00 44,956.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,241.38 0.00 37,241.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 159,304.30 50.68 550.00 0.00 5,066.60 73.33 11,798.14 50.69 20,485.67 49.80 1,116.26 51.26 198,320.97 51.58 27,122.12 75.34 0.38 99.99 27,122.50 75.99 1,265.58 42.47 4,896.68 49.84 20.00 93.94 2,061.61 64.01 24,111.00 50.00 2,806.00 49.96 8,270.00 49.99 43,430.87 50.86 Total Finance Administration 610,952.00 44,457.26 304,836.28 37,241.38 268,874.34 55.99 1203 Personnel 12034100 Personal Services 12034102 Regular Salaries 12034111 Accrual Cash In 1203-4180 Retirement 12034188 Employee Benefits 12034189 Medicare Benefits 80,710.00 2,938.00 5,888.00 40,658.00 1,197.00 6,347.54 0.00 2,826.76 4,461.04 94.25 42,618.13 0.00 5,477.75 24,261.62 631.36 0.00 38,091.87 52.80 0.00 2,938.00 0.00 0.00 410.25 93.03 0.00 16,396.38 59.67 0.00 565.64 52.75 Page: 5 expstat.rpt 02103/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report Page: 6 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 001 General Fund Account Number Total Personal Services 1203-4200 Contract Services 1203-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1203-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 1203-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1203-4304 Telephone 1203-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1203-4315 Membership 1203-4317 Conference/Training 1203-4320 Medical Exams 1203-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 1203-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 131,391.00 13,729.59 72,988.86 0.00 58,402.14 55.55 64,675.00 7,000.00 71,675.00 1,470.00 5,500.00 820.00 14,900.00 17,575.00 21,435.00 4,513.00 66,213.00 1,554.89 0.00 1,554.89 195.18 268.10 280.00 2,250.00 356.00 1,786.00 376.00 5,511.28 19,710.79 0.00 19,710.79 669.85 1,055.97 579.00 5,009.00 2,700.00 10,716.00 2,256.00 22,985.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,964.21 30.48 7,000.00 0.00 51,964.21 27.50 800.15 45.57 4,444.03 19.20 241.00 70.61 9,891.00 33.62 14,875.00 15.36 10,719.00 49.99 2,257.00 49.99 43,227.18 34.71 Total Personnel 269,279.00 20,795.76 115,685.47 0.00 153,593.53 42.96 1208 General Appropriations 1208-4100 Personal Services 1208-4102 Regular Salaries iii1208-4111 Accrual Cash In 208.4180 Retirement 1208-4188 Employee Benefits 1208-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services • 1208-4200 Contract Services 1208-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 1208-4300 Materials/Supplles/Other 42,261.00 4,134.00 3,319.00 9,363.00 643.00 59,720.00 8,234.00 8,234.00 3,526.00 0.00 264.10 815.82 51.12 4,657.04 455.10 455.10 20,987.00 0.00 1,571.97 4,699.73 304.30 27,563.00 4,041.63 4,041.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,274.00 49.66 4,134.00 0.00 1,747.03 47.36 4,663.27 50.19 338.70 47.33 32,157.00 46.15 4,192.37 49.08 4,192.37 49.08 • Page: 6 • expstat.rpt 02103/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 7 001 General Fund Account Number 1208-4304 Telephone 1208-4305 Office Oper Supplies 12084390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 1208-4396 Insurance User Charges 1.1 Total Matedals/Supplies/Other Total General Appropriations 1214 Prospective Expenditures 12144300 Materials/Supplies/Other 12144322 Unclassified Total Prospective Expenditures 1299 Interfund Transfers Out Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prot Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 150.00 -31,000.00 14,014.00 2,246.00 -14,590.00 12.42 261.60 1,168.00 187.00 1,629.02 45.93 -7,862.83 7,008.00 1,122.00 313.10 0.00 549.37 0.00 0.00 549.37 104.07 30.62 -23,686.54 23.59 7,006.00 50.01 1,124.00 49.96 -15,452.47 5.91 53,364.00 6,741.16 31,917.73 549.37 20,896.90 60.84 416,363.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 416,363.00 0.00 416,363.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 416,363.00 0.00 12994300 Matedals/Supplies/Other 1299-4399 OperatingTransfers Out 756,150.00 86,413.00 378,098.00 0.00 378.052.00 50.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 756,150.00 86,413.00 378,098.00 0.00 378,052.00 50.00 2101 Police 21014100 Personal Services *1014102 Regular Salaries 21014105 Special Duty Pay 21014106 Regular Overtime 21014111 Accrual Cash In 21014117 Shift Differential 21014118 Training Officer 21014180 Retirement 21014187 Uniform Allowance 21014188 Employee Benefits 21014189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 3,140,148.00 57,432.00 268,000.00 378,857.00 6,482.00 9,700.00 1,075,854.00 30,400.00 357,957.00 37,092.00 5,361,922.00 242,722.14 1,481,285.72 4,543.50 29,875.03 7,328.48 94,762.92 43,699.41 406,477.14 467.68 2,227.03 0.00 588.00 83,499.23 552,232.06 2,180.20 13,841.32 26,984.43 153,444.65 2,993.01 21,047.16 414,418.08 2,755,781.03 0.00 1,658,862.28 47.17 0.00 27,556.97 52.02 0.00 173,237.08 35.36 0.00 -27,620.14 107.29 0.00 4,254.97 34.36 0.00 9,112.00 6.06 0.00 523,621.94 51.33 71.30 16,487.38 45.77 0.00 204,512.35 42.87 0.00 16,044.84 56.74 71.30 2,606,069.67 51.40 Page: 7 expstat.rpt 0210312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report Page: 8 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 001 General Fund Account Number 2101-4200 Contract Services 2101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2101-4251 ContractSenicelGovt Total Contract Services •01.4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 21014304 Telephone 2101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 21014306 Prisoner Maintenance 21014307 Radio Maintenance 21014309 Maintenance Materials 21014312 Travel Expense , POST 21014313 Travel Expense, STC 21014314 Uniforms 21014315 Membership 21014317 Conference/Training 21014390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 21014395 Equip Replacement Charges 21014396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2101-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 10101-5402 Equip -More Than 51,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Police 2102 Crossing Guard 21024200 Contract SeMces 21024201 Contract Serv/Private Total Crossing Guard 2201 Fire Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 305,477.00 35,250.00 340,727.00 50,000.00 19,885.00 7,500.00 3,500.00 4,600.00 10,000.00 2,600.00 14,800.00 2,205.00 22,475.00 31,263.00 297,550.00 631,543.00 1,097,921.00 36,300.00 36,300.00 9,843.98 32,886.49 0.00 27,312.84 9,843.98 60,199.33 7,725.33 31,837.33 1,608.31 7,785.33 663.80 3,262.81 0.00 534.60 107.16 1,413.17 0.00 412.00 0.00 1,373.58 142.78 2,558.11 155.00 520.00 850.00 6,875.62 2,605.00 15,630.00 24,795.00 148,770.00 52,628.00 315,768.00 91,280.38 536,740.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,573.50 0.00 1,573.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,669.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,669.56 0.00 0.00 271,017.01 11.28 7,937.16 77.48 278,954.17 18.13 18,162.67 63.67 12,099.67 39.15 4,237.19 43.50 2,965.40 15.27 3,186.83 30.72 9,588.00 4.12 1,226.42 52.83 10,572.33 28.57 1,685.00 23.58 15,599.38 30.59 15,633.00 50.00 148,780.00 50.00 315,775.00 50.00 559,510.89 49.04 36,300.00 0.00 36,300.00 0.00 6,836,870.00 515,542.44. 3,352,720.91 3,314.36 3,480,834.73 49.09 61,888.00 8,687.74 23,487.33 38,070.17 330.50 99.47 61,888.00 8,687.74 23,487.33 38,070.17 330.50 99.47 Page: 8 • expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/112003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 9 001 General Fund Account Number 2201-4100 Personal Services 22014102 Regular Salaries 2201-4106 Regular Overtime `2014108 FLSA Overtime 14111 Accrual Cash In 22014112 PartTime/Temporary 22014119 Fitness Incentive 2201-4180 Retirement 22014187 Uniform Allowance 22014188 Employee Benefits 22014189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 22014200 Contract Services 22014201 Contract Serv/Private 22014251 Contract SeMce/Govt Total Contract SeMces 22014300 Materials/Supplies/Other 22014304 Telephone 22014305 Office Oper Supplies 14309 Maintenance Materials Wir 014314 Uniforms 22014315 Membership 22014317 Conference/Training 22014390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 22014395 Equip Replacement Charges 22014396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2201-5401 Equip -Less Than 51,000 2201-5402 Equip -More Than 31,000 Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1,707,286.00 249,235.00 139,367.00 281,043.00 41,000.00 8,400.00 518,460.00 12,000.00 198,821.00 15,299.00 3,170,911.00 39,412.00 2,776.00 42,188.00 15,672.00 11,066.00 21,000.00 4,438.00 4,239.00 34,275.00 36,007.00 125,952.00 230,326.00 482,975.00 134,546.01 812,011.59 26,913.87 153,788.79 14,606.90 75,748.50 0.00 27,623.43 3,800.00 24,000.00 550.00 4,750.00 43,937.75 268,323.95 1,000.00 6,766.39 17,445.69 95,707.20 1,791.24 11,431.65 244, 591.46 1,480,151.50 2,078.75 15,562.15 0.00 3,250.00 2,078.75 18,812.15 1,694.53 6,280.95 261.67 2,864.19 1,624.29 9,016.34 33.31 1,215.41 0.00 2,375.26 1,335.00 10,881.98 3,001.00 18,006.00 10,496.00 62,976.00 19,194.00 115,164.00 37,639.80 228,780.13 0.00 895,274.41 0.00 95,446.21 0.00 63,618.50 0.00 253,419.57 0.00 17,000.00 0.00 3,650.00 0.00 250,136.05 0.00 5,233.61 0.00 103,113.80 0.00 3,867.35 0.00 1,690,759.50 11,576.25 12,273.60 0.00 474.00 11,576.25 11,799.60 0.00 9,391.05 269.54 7,932.27 0.00 11,983.66 2,706.89 515.70 0.00 1,863.74 130.00 23,263.02 0.00 18,001.00 0.00 62,976.00 0.00 115,162.00 3,106.43 251,088.44 1,230.00 61.63 1,143.57 0.00 86.43 13,789.00 0.00 7,472.41 6,542.50 -225.91 47.56 61.70 54.35 9.83 58.54 56.55 51.75 56.39 48.14 74.72 46.68 68.86 117.07 72.03 40.08 28.32 42.93 88.38 56.03 32.13 50.01 50.00 50.00 48.01 92.97 101.64 Page: 9 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 10 001 General Fund Account Number Total EqulpmenVFumiture Total Fire 3104 Traffic Safety/St. Maint. •1044100 Personal Services 3104-4102 Regular Salaries 3104-4106 Regular Overtime 3104-4111 Accrual Cash In 3104-4180 Retirement 3104-4188 Employee Benefits 3104-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 3104-4200 Contract Services 3104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3104-4251 Contract SeMce/Govt Total Contract Services 3104-4300 Materlals/Supplies/Other 3104-4303 Utilities 3104-4309 Maintenance Materials 01043395 Equip Replacement Charges 104-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Traffic Safety/St Malnt. 4101 Community Dev/Planning 4101-4100 Personal Services 4101-4102 Regular Salaries 41014111 Accrual Cash In 4101-4112 PartTime/Temporary Adjusted Appropriation 15,019.00 3,711,093.00 237,467.00 6,500.00 4,870.00 17,816.00 31,876.00 923.00 299,452.00 261,491.00 560.00 262,051.00 16,920.00 61,850.00 24,597.00 106,450.00 209,817.00 771,320.00 290,113.00 4,028.00 8,060.00 Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures 61.63 8,615.98 284,371.64 1,736,359.76 19,713.73 117,665.82 468.79 2,428.97 0.00 3,927.66 1,471.15 8,827.44 2,766.84 15,889.91 76.17 456.70 24,496.68 149,196.50 15,429.42 88,718.66 0.00 510.32 15,429.42 89,228.98 1,241.20 5,685.55 6,609.79 27,489.40 2,050.00 12,300.00 8,871.00 53,226.00 18,771.99 98,700.95 58,698.09 337,126.43 21,946.70 0.00 0.00 120,888.88 1,141.92 2,880.72 Year-to-date Encumbrances 6,542.50 21,225.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 148,538.00 0.00 148,538.00 0.00 378.30 0.00 0.00 378.30 148,916.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Prct Balance Used -139.48 100.93 47.36 1,953,508.06 119,801.18 49.55 4,071.03 37.37 942.34 80.65 8,988.56 49.55 15,986.09 49.85 466.30 49.48 150,255.50 49.82 24,234.34 90.73 49.68 91.13 24,284.02 90.73 11,234.45 33.60 33,982.30 45.06 12,297.00 50.01 53,224.00 50.00 110,737.75 47.22 285,277.27 63.01 169,224.12 2,886.08 5,179.28 41.67 28.35 35.74 Page: 10 • expstat.rpt • 02/03/2004 6:41 AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 11 001 General Fund Account Number 4101.4180 Retirement 4101-4188 Employee Benefits 4101-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1014200 Contract Services 41014201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 4101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 41014304 Telephone 41014305 Office Oper Supplies 41014315 Membership 41014317 Conference/Training 41014390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 41014396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Community Dev/Planning 4201 Community Dev/Building 42014100 Personal Services •42014102 Regular Salaries 42014111 Accrual Cash In 42014112 Part Time/Temporary 42014180 Retirement 42014188 Employee Benefits 42014189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 42014200 Contract Services 42014201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Adjusted Appropriation 24,102.00 39,079.00 4,708.00 370,090.00 46,157.00 46,157.00 1,000.00 7,000.00 1,360.00 8,120.00 26,705.00 12,052.00 56,237.00 472,484.00 311,201.00 3,584.00 8,643.00 23,152.00 32,050.00 4,519.00 383,149.00 Year-to-date Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances 1,806.01 2,592.61 353.14 26,698.46 864.50 864.50 111.64 298.81 0.00 30.00 2,226.00 1,004.00 3,670.45 31,233.41 23,628.16 0.00 1,930.87 1,782.74 2,818.60 496.70 30,657.07 10,016.32 15,052.25 2,197.43 152,177.52 14,944.38 14,944.38 407.51 2,040.67 0.00 476.02 13,356.00 6,024.00 22,304.20 189,426.10 129,553.82 1,241.22 15,177.27 9,776.74 16,903.59 2,460.65 175,113.29 302,094.00 19,443.75 157,206.34 302,094.00 19,443.75 157,206.34 Prot Balance Used 0.00 14,085.68 41.56 0.00 24,026.75 38.52 0.00 2,510.57 46.67 0.00 217,912.48 41.12 2,750.00 2,750.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,750.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,696.80 5,696.80 28,462.62 38.34 28,462.62 38.34 592.49 40.75 4,959.33 29.15 1,360.00 0.00 7,643.98 5.86 13,349.00 50.01 6,028.00 49.98 33,932.80 39.66 280,307.90 40.67 181,647.18 41.63 2,342.78 34.63 -6,534.27 175.60 13,375.26 42.23 15,146.41 52.74 2,058.35 54.45 208,035.71 45.70 139,190.86 53.92 139,190.86 53.92 Page: 11 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 12 001 General Fund Account Number 4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 42014304 Telephone 42014305 Office Oper Supplies 2014315 Membership 14317 Conference/Training 014390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 42014395 Equip Replacement Charges 42014396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Community Dev/Building 4202 Public Works Administration 42024100 Personal Services 42024102 Regular Salaries 42024106 Regular Overtime 42024111 Accrual Cash In 42024180 Retirement 42024188 Employee Benefits 42024189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 0024200 Contract Services 42024201 Contract Serv/Prfvate Total Contract Services 42024300 Matertals/Supplies/Other 42024304 Telephone 42024305 Office Oper Supplies 42024314 Uniforms 42024315 Membership 42024317 Conference/Training 42024390 Computer Replacement Chrgs Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 2,675.00 710.00 1,463.85 0.00 1,211.15 54.72 6,000.00 335.44 3,001.43 0.00 2,998.57 50.02 1,970.00 150.00 225.00 0.00 1,745.00 11.42 3,500.00 100.00 160.00 780.00 2,560.00 26.86 41,165.00 3,431.00 20,586.00 0.00 20,579.00 50.01 13,121.00 1,093.00 6,558.00 0.00 6,563.00 49.98 23,181.00 1,932.00 11,592.00 0.00 11,589.00 50.01 91,612.00 7,751.44 43,586.28 780.00 47,245.72 48.43 776,855.00 57,852.26 375,905.91 6,476.80 394,472.29 49.22 144,781.00 5,000.00 4,064.00 11,515.00 19,070.00 2,190.00 186,620.00 41,241.00 41,241.00 17,600.00 11,500.00 8,000.00 1,500.00 10,900.00 49,332.00 12,800.87 277.30 0.00 956.09 1,676.16 190.60 15,901.02 2,078.48 2,078.48 1,989.86 616.23 355.68 573.00 223.00 4,111.00 73,294.47 1,292.95 2,309.00 5,483.51 9,277.89 1,122.50 92,780.32 2,696.70 2,696.70 9,605.75 5,153.11 2,194.56 658.00 6,177.85 24,666.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71,486.53 3,707.05 1,755.00 6,031.49 9,792.11 1,067.50 93,839.68 50.62 25.86 56.82 47.62 48.65 51.26 49.72 8,522.14 30,022.16 27.20 8,522.14 30,022.16 27.20 0.00 725.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,994.25 5,621.00 5,805.44 842.00 4,722.15 24,666.00 54.58 51.12 27.43 43.87 56.68 50.00 Page: 12 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 13 001 General Fund Account Number 42024395 Equip Replacement Charges 4202-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0202-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 4202-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Public Works Administration 4204 Building Maintenance 42044100 Personal Services 4204-4102 Regular Salaries 4204-4106 Regular Overtime 4204-4111 Accrual Cash In 42044180 Retirement 4204-4188 Employee Benefits Total Personal Services 42044200 Contract Services 42044201 Contract Serv/Private •42044300 Materials/Supplles/Other Total Contract Services 4204-4303 Utilities 4204-4309 Maintenance Materials 42044321 Building Sfty/Security 42044395 Equip Replacement Charges 42044396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Building Maintenance 4601 Community Resources Adjusted Appropriation Expenditures 12,596.00 66,729.00 178,157.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 407,618.00 82,694.00 2,500.00 2,440.00 6,247.00 12,800.00 106,681.00 183,000.00 183,000.00 136,026.00 23,000.00 6,000.00 10,063.00 13,175.00 188,264.00 477,945.00 Year-to-date Year-to-date Expenditures Encumbrances 1,050.00 5,561.00 14,479.77 0.00 0.00 32,459.27 6,988.07 466.14 1,541.61 526.12 1,118.26 10,640.20 9,847.19 9,847.19 10,177.86 1,334.53 264.01 839.00 1,098.00 13,713.40 34,200.79 6,300.00 33,366.00 88,121.27 1,062.68 1.062.68 184,660.97 41,419.98 1,755.32 4,177.08 3,118.65 6,446.85 56,917.88 51,965.29 51,965.29 54,887.24 9,261.60 1,516.93 5,034.00 6,588.00 77,287.77 186,170.94 0.00 0.00 725.89 0.00 0.00 9,248.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,791.00 2,791.00 0.00 118.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 118.51 2,909.51 Prct Balance Used 6,296.00 50.02 33,363.00 50.00 89,309.84 49.87 537.32 66.42 537.32 66.42 213,709.00 47.57 41,274.02 50.09 744.68 70.21 -1,737.08 171.19 3,128.35 49.92 6,353.15 50.37 49,763.12 53.35 128,243.71 29.92 128,243.71 29.92 81,138.76 40.35 13,619.89 40.78 4,483.07 25.28 5,029.00 50.02 6,587.00 50.00 110,857.72 41.12 288,864.55 39.56 Page: 13 expstat.rpt 0210312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 14 001 General Fund Account Number 4601-4100 Personal Services 4601-4102 Regular Salaries 4601-4106 Regular Overtime 4601-4111 Accrual Cash In 0014112 Part Time/Temporary 4601-4180 Retirement 46014188 Employee Benefits 46014189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 4601-4200 Contract Services 4601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 46014221 Contract Rec Classes/Programs Total Contract SeMces 46014300 Materials/Supplies/Other 46014302 Advertising 46014304 Telephone 46014305 Office Oper Supplies 46014308 Program Materials 46014309 Maintenance Materials at6014315 Membership 6014317 Conference/Training 46014319 Special Events 46014390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 46014395 Equip Replacement Charges 46014396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4601-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 4601-5401 Equip -Less Than 51,000 4601-5402 Equip -More Than 51,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 328,433.00 15,378.68 92,013.07 2,700.00 0.00 2,129.61 10,082.00 0.00 0.00 140,000.00 8,088.29 78,731.37 24,285.00 1,157.71 6,931.17 42,421.00 1,365.03 7,854.56 17,003.00 594.43 5,641.13 564,924.00 26,584.14 193,300.91 105,830.00 2,256.04 83,448.89 202,369.00 13,805.60 112,246.14 308,199.00 16,061.64 195,695.03 28,500.00 0.00 9,330.03 9,220.00 1,034.50 4,475.13 9,000.00 1,092.36 3,418.26 41,431.00 874.01 18,460.90 2,000.00 29.90 163.42 1,100.00 36.00 896.00 5,600.00 0.00 948.34 5,108.00 0.00 2,817.43 49,861.00 4,155.00 24,930.00 12,222.00 1,019.00 6,114.00 42,920.00 3,577.00 21,462.00 206,962.00 11,817.77 93,015.51 11,473.00 888.48 1,054.75 1,677.00 0.00 0.00 13,150.00 888.48 1,054.75 0.00 236,419.93 28.02 0.00 570.39 78.87 0.00 10,082.00 0.00 0.00 61,268.63 56.24 0.00 17,353.83 28.54 0.00 34,566.44 18.52 0.00 11,361.87 33.18 0.00 371,623.09 34.22 0.00 22,381.11 78.85 0.00 90,122.86 55.47 0.00 112,503.97 63.50 0.00 19,169.97 32.74 0.00 4,744.87 48.54 0.00 5,581.74 37.98 223.27 22,746.83 45.10 0.00 1,836.58 8.17 0.00 204.00 81.45 0.00 4,651.66 16.93 0.00 2,290.57 55.16 0.00 24,931.00 50.00 0.00 6,108.00 50.02 0.00 21,458.00 50.00 223.27 113,723.22 45.05 24.99 10,393.26 9.41 1389.92 287.08 82.88 1,414.91 10,680.34 18.78 Page: 14 • expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 15 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prot Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used Total Community Resources 1,093,235.00 55,352.03 483,066.20 1,638.18 608,530.62 44.34 6101 Parks 6101.4100 Personal Services 101.4102 Regular Salaries 61014106 Regular Overtime 61014111 Accrual Cash In 61014180 Retirement 61014188 Employee Benefits 61014189. Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 61014200 Contract Services 61014201 Contract Serv/Private 61014251 Contract SeMce/Govt Total Contract Services 61014300 Materials/Supplies/Other 61014303 Utilities 61014309 Maintenance Materials 61014395 Equip Replacement Chrgs .1014396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 6101-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 6101-5402 Equip -More Than 51,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Parks 8622 ADA Compliance, City Hall 86224200 Contract Services 100,833.00 2,000.00 2,784.00 7,592.00 14,200.00 541.00 127,950.00 236,958.00 100.00 237,058.00 137,000.00 17,400.00 19,176.00 18,200.00 191,776.00 13,515.00 13,515.00 8,499.49 50,488.77 175.00 413.09 0.00 3,698.35 639.84 3,800.90 1,241.58 7,183.85 45.05 296.33 10,600.96 65,881.29 5,419.46 84,221.61 0.00 0.00 5,419.46 84,221.61 3,013.29 62,667.31 712.48 9,773.72 1,598.00 9,588.00 1,517.00 9,102.00 6,840.77 91,131.03 167.79 7,985.01 167.79 7 985 01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 149,644.77 0.00 149,644.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,344.23 50.07 1,586.91 20.65 -914.35 132.84 3,791.10 50.06 7,016.15 50.59 244.67 54.77 62,068.71 51.49 3,091.62 98.70 100.00 0.00 3,191.62 98.65 74,332.69 45.74 7,626.28 56.17 9,588.00 50.00 9,098.00 50.01 100,644.97 47.52 5,529.99 59.08 5,529.99 59.08 570,299.00 23,028.98 249,218.94 149,644.77 171,435.29 69.94 Page: 15 expstat.rpt 02/0312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 16 001 General Fund Account Number 8622-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total ADA Compliance, City Hall 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase III Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 29,497.00 0.00 740.00 493.93 28,263.07 4.18 29,497.00 0.00 740.00 493.93 28,263.07 4.18 6630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Private 385,577.00 17,981.89 38,097.65 Total Pier Renovation/Phase III 385,577.00 17,981.89 38,097.65 Total General Fund 18,798,876.00 1,359,885.14 8,436,727.76 222,694.63 222,694.63 124,784.72 67.64 124,784.72 67.64 651,797.61 9.710.350.63 48.35 Page: 16 expstat.rpt • 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/112003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 17 105 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 02994399 Operating Transfers Out 20,463.00 1,705.00 10,230.00 0.00 10,233.00 49.99 Total Interfund Transfers Out 20,463.00 1,705.00 10,230.00 0.00 10,233.00 49.99 2601 Llghting/Landscaping/Medians 2601-4100 Personal Services 26014102 Regular Salaries 2601-4106 Regular Overtime 26014111 Accrual Cash In 26014180 Retirement 26014188 Employee Benefits 26014189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 26014200 Contract Services 26014201 Contract Serv/Private 26014251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services *6014300 Materials/Supplies/Other 26014303 Utilities 26014309 Maintenance Materials 26014395 Equip Replacement Charges 26014396 Insurance User Charges Total Materiats/Supplies/Other Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians Total Liohtq/Landscapo Dist Fund 167,456.00 2,000.00 3,621.00 12,532.00 20,616.00 2,212.00 208,437.00 41,207.00 21,700.00 62,907.00 188,000.00 28,300.00 41,819.00 36,192.00 294,311.00 565,655.00 13,616.07 82,187.13 0.00 1,609.90 0.00 5,218.59 1,019.05 6,151.09 2,263.20 13,053.12 177.34 1,174.24 17,075.66 109,394.07 0.00 13,659.00 2,859.32 4,903.42 2,859.32 18,562.42 11,315.44 59,450.82 280.08 9,967.49 3,485.00 20,910.00 3,016.00 18,096.00 18,096.52 108,424.31 38,031.50 236,380.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 85,268.87 49.08 390.10 80.50 -1,597.59 144.12 6,380.91 49.08 7,562.88 63.32 1,037.76 53.08 99,042.93 52.48 27,548.00 33.15 16,796.58 22.60 44,344.58 29.51 0.00 128,549.18 31.62 0.00 18,332.51 35.22 0.00 20,909.00 50.00 0.00 18,096.00 50.00 0.00 185,886.69 36.84 0.00 329,274.20 41.79 586,118.00 39,736.50 246,610.80 0.00 339,507.20 42.08 Page: 17 expstat.rpt 02/0312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 18 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 12994300 Materials/Supplies/Other .299-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 3301 Downtown Enhancement 33014100 Personal Services 33014102 Regular Salaries 33014106 Regular Overtime 3301-4111 Accrual Cash In 33014180 Retirement 33014188 Employee Benefits 33014189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 33014200 Contract Services 33014201 Contract Sery/Private Total Contract Services 33014300 Materials/Supplies/Other *301.4309 Maintenance Materials 33014319 Spedal Events 33014396 Insurance User Charges Total Matedals/SupplieslOther 33014900 Depredation 33014901 Depredation/Math/Equip Total Depredation Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 3,334.00 278.00 1,668.00 0.00 1,666.00 5003 3,334.00 278.00 1,668.00 0.00 1,666.00 50.03 34,459.00 700.00 1,378.00 2,551.00 4,199.00 407.00 43,694.00 154,361.00 154,361.00 2,000.00 66,040.00 2,897.00 70,937.00 1,210.00 1,210.00 2,753.54 17,251.68 0.00 399.55 0.00 142.08 203.77 1,307.22 358.25 2,074.96 31.83 209.81 3,347.39 21,385.30 9,809.03 59,839.54 9,809.03 59,839.54 0.00 626.10 22,803.86 33,784.34 241.00 1,446.00 23,044.86 35,856.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,964.85 80,964.85 0.00 4,103.50 0.00 4,103.50 0.00 0.00 17,207.32 300.45 1,235.92 1,243.78 2,124.04 197.19 22,308.70 50.06 57.08 10.31 51.24 49.42 51.55 48.94 13,556.61 91.22 13,556.61 91.22 1,373.90 28,152.16 1,451.00 30,977.06 31.31 57.37 49.91 56.33 1,210.00 0.00 1,210.00 0.00 Total Dovmtown Enhancement 270,202.00 36,201.28 117,081.28 85,068.35 68,052.37 74.81 3304 North Pier Parking Structure Page: 18 expstat.rpt 0210312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1211/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 19 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund Account Number 3304-4200 Contract Services 3304-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3304-4231 Contract Serv/Pkg Lot Operator • Total Contract Services 3304-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3304-4303 Utilities 3304-4304 Telephone 3304-4309 Maintenance Materials Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3304-4900 Depredation Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 20,996.00 192,944.00 213,940.00 37,000.00 435.00 4,100.00 41,535.00 145.00 15,09Z96 15,237.96 2,310.66 70.24 0.00 2,380.90 13,365.10 71,090.66 84,455.76 11,640.58 227.08 1,263.58 13,131.24 0.00 121,853.34 121,853.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,630.90 63.66 0.00 100.00 7,630.90 96.43 25,359.42 31.46 207.92 52.20 2,836.42 30.82 28,403.76 31.61 3304-4903 Depredation/Bldgs 116,350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 116,350.00 0.00 Total Depredation 116,350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 116,350.00 0.00 3304-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total North Pier Parking Structure 371,825.00 17,618.86 97,587.00 121,853.34 152,384.66 59.02 3305 Downtown Parking Lot A *305-4200 Contract Services 3305-4231 Contract Serv/Pkg Lot Operator 144,811.00 12,090.70 56,830.55 87,980.45 0.00 100.00 Total Downtown Parking Lot A 144,811.00 12,090.70 56,830.55 87,980.45 0.00 100.00 3306 Co. Share Pkg Structure Rev. 3306-4200 Contract Services 3306-4251 Contract Services/Govt Total Co. Share Pkg Structure Rev. 3307 Lifeguard Serv/Beach Maint 210,576.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 210,576.00 0.00 210,576.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 210,576.00 0.00 Page: 19 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 20 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund Account Number 33074200 Contract Services 33074251 Contract Services/Govt Total lifeguard Serv/Beach Maint 40140 11th PI Street Parking Imp 8140-4200 Contract Services 8140-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total 11th PI Street Parking Imp • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 55,000.00 55,000.00 55,000.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 55,000.00 55,000.00 55,000.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 287,502.00 287,502.00 Total Downtown Enhancement Fund 1,343,250.00 0.00 0.00 1,790.00 1,790.00 11,680.00 11,680.00 274,032.00 4.69 274,032.00 4.69 121,188.84 329,956.83 306,582.14 706.711.03 47.39 Page: 20 • expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1211/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 21 110 Parking Fund Account Number 1204 Finance Cashier 1204-4100 Personal Services 04.4102 Regular Salaries 04-4106 Regular Overtime 1204-4111 Accrual Cash In 12044180 Retirement 12044188 Employee Benefits 12044189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1204-4200 Contract Services 1204-4201 Contract Serv/Pdvate Total Contract Services 1204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1204-4304 Telephone 1204-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1204-4315 Membership 1204-4317 Conference/Training 1204-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs *2044396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1204-4900 Depredation 1204-4901 Depredation/Mach/Equip Total Depredation Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 263,881.00 500.00 6,076.00 19,717.00 36,451.00 2,564.00 329,189.00 66,684.00 66,684.00 2,201.00 23,503.00 150.00 4,386.00 67,879.00 10,446.00 108,565.00 850.00 850.00 21,563.52 128,168.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,120.76 1,611.25 9,576.54 3,490.37 18,586.90 213.37 1,280.20 26,878.51 158,732.79 1,095.73 - 17,615.16 1,095.73 17,615.16 231.74 887.57 505.59 5,914.78 0.00 0.00 892.93 1,914.43 5,657.00 33,942.00 870.00 5,220.00 8,157.26 47,878.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.431.14 20,431.14 0.00 5,057.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,057.32 0.00 0.00 135,712.61 48.57 500.00 0.00 4,955.24 18.45 10,140.46 48.57 17,864.10 50.99 1,283.80 49.93 170,456.21 48.22 28,637.70 57.05 28,63730 57.05 1,313.43 40.33 12,530.90 46.68 150.00 0.00 2,471.57 43.65 33,937.00 50.00 5,226.00 49.97 55,628.90 48.76 850.00 0.00 850.00 0.00 Total Finance Cashier 505,288.00 36,131.50 224,226.73 25,488.46 255,572.81 49.42 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Page: 21 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 22 110 Parking Fund Account Number 1299-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 3302 Community SeMces *023100 Personal Services 3302-4102 Regular Salaries 33024106 Regular Overtime 33024111 Accrual Cash In 33024112 Partlime/Temporary 33024117 Shift Differential 3302-4118 Field Training Officer 33024180 Retirement 33024187 Uniform Allowance 33024188 Employee Benefits 33024189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal SeMces 33024200 Contract SeMces 33024201 Contract Serv/Private 33024251 Contract SeMces/Govt Total Contract Services .3024300 Materials/Supplies/Other 33024304 Telephone 33024305 Office Oper Supplies 33024307 Radio Maintenance 33024309 Maintenance Materials 33024314 Uniforms 33024315 Membership 33024317 Conference/Training 33024390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 33024395 Equip Replacement Charges 33024396 Insurance User Charges Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1,210,811.00 100,901.00 605,406.00 0.00 605,405.00 50.00 1,210,811.00 100,901.00 605,406.00 0.00 605,405.00 50.00 661,188.00 53,483.85 325,381.52 6,000.00 0.00 655.58 34,863.00 0.00 18,461.21 9,216.00 210.48 2,492.48 5,000.00 426.24 2,571.52 500.00 , 0.00 0.00 84,990.00 6,539.47 41,165.65 5,880.00 490.00 2,940.00 82,693.00 7,502.35 42,555.09 4,311.00 487.32 2,461.93 894,641.00 69,139.71 438,684.98 16,581.00 370.00 4,138.18 1,800.00 237.78 810.35 18,381.00 607.78 4,948.53 3,000.00 463.59 1,605.08 9,500.00 26.30 386.92 1,600.00 0.00 425.11 14,151.00 0.00 12,550.56 3,000.00 760.95 760.95 375.00 0.00 0.00 6,750.00 1,038.75 1,829.91 56,641.00 4,720.00 28,320.00 83,339.00 6,945.00 41,670.00 102,065.00 8,505.00 51,030.00 0.00 335,806.48 49.21 0.00 5,344.42 10.93 0.00 16,401.79 52.95 0.00 6,723.52 27.05 0.00 2,428.48 51.43 0.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 43,824.35 48.44 0.00 2,940.00 50.00 0.00 40,137.91 51.46 0.00 1,849.07 57.11 0.00 455,956.02 49.03 0.00 12,442.82 24.96 0.00 989.65 45.02 0.00 13,432.47 26.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,447.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,394.92 53.50 9,113.08 4.07 1,174.89 26.57 152.49 98.92 2,239.05 25.37 375.00 0.00 4,920.09 27.11 28,321.00 50.00 41,669.00 50.00 51,035.00 50.00 Page: 22 • expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 02/0312004 6:41AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 1213112003 Page: 23 110 Parking Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used Total Materials/Supplies/Other 280,421.00 22,459.59 138,578.53 1,447.95 140,394.52 49.93 3302-4900 Depredation 3302-4901 Depredation/Mach/Equip •302-4903 Depredation/Bldgs Total Depredation 3302-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 3302-5401 Equip -Less Than 51,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Community Services 8140 11th PI Street Parking Imp 8140-4200 Contract Services 8140-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total 11th PI Street Parking Imp 1,705.00 1,185.00 2,890.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.95 160.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,705.00 1,185.00 2,890.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 339.05 32.19 339.05 32.19 1,196,833.00 92,207.08 582,372.99 1,447.95 613,012.06 48.78 9,592.00 0.00 0.00 9,592.00 0.00 0.00 Total Parking Fund 2,922,524.00 229,239.58 1,412,005.72 0.00 0.00 26,936.41 9,592.00 0.00 9,592.00 0.00 1.483.581.87 49.24 Page: 23 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 24 115 State Gas Tax Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 40299-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total State Gas Tax Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 355,488.00 29,624.00 177,744.00 0.00 177,744.00 50.00 355,488.00 29,624.00 177,744.00 0.00 177,744.00 50.00 Page: 24 • expstat.rpt 02/0312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 25 117 AB939 Fund Account Number 5301 Source Redctn/Recycle Element Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 53014100 Personal Services x301-4102 Regular Salaries 19,854.00 1,781.73 9,637.11 0.00 10,216.89 48.54 301.4111 Accrual Cash In 1,274.00 0.00 618.06 0.00 655.94 48.51 53014180 Retirement 1,443.00 131.87 711.95 0.00 731.05 49.34 53014188 Employee Benefits 2,600.00 220.57 1,295.93 0.00 1,304.07 49.84 53014189 Medicare Benefits 288.00 26.44 152.30 0.00 135.70 52.88 Total Personal Services 25,459.00 2,160.61 12,415.35 0.00 13,043.65 48.77 53014200 Contract Services 5301-4201 Contract Serv/Private 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 Total Contract Services 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 53014300 Materials/Supplies/Other 53014305 Office Oper Supplies 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 5301-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 5301-5499 Non -Capitalized Assets 156,560.00 21,312.08 21,312.08 85,247.92 50,000.00 68.06 Total Equipment/Fumiture 156,560.00 21,312.08 21,312.08 85,247.92 50,000.00 68.06 • Total AB939 Fund 213,519.00 23,472.69 33,72743 85,247.92 94,543.65 55.72 Page: 25 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/112003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 26 119 Compensated Absences Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 99-4399 Operating Transfers Out 148,972.00 12,414.00 74,484.00 0.00 74,488.00 50.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 148,972.00 12,414.00 74,484.00 0.00 74,488.00 50.00 Total Compensated Absences Fund 148,972.00 12,414.00 74,484.00 0.00 74.488.00 50.00 Page: 26 expstat.rpt 0210312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12131/2003 Page: 27 121 Prop A Open Space Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other .2991399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase 111 Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 20,557.00 1,713.00 10,278.00 0.00 10,279.00 50.00 20,557.00 1,713.00 10,278.00 0.00 10,279.00 50.00 8630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Private 141,723.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 141,723.00 0.00 Total Pier Renovation/PhaseIII 141,723.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 141,723.00 0.00 Total Prop A Open Space Fund 162,280.00 1,713.00 10,278.00 0.00 152.002.00 6.33 • Page: 27 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 28 122 Tyco Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Matedals/Supplies/Other 40299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 8108 2nd Street Resurfadng 8108-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prot Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 275,000.00 22,917.00 137,502.00 0.00 137,498.00 50.00 275,000.00 22,917.00 137,502.00 0.00 137,498.00 50.00 8108-4201 Contract Serv/Private 385,400.00 0.00 5,484.00 0.00 379,916.00 1.42 Total 2nd Street Resurfadng 385,400.00 0.00 5,484.00 0.00 379,916.00 1.42 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase III 8630-4100 Personal Services 8630-4102 Regular Salaries 8630-4180 Retirement 8630-4188 Employee Benefits 8630-4189 Fla Total Personal Services 8630-4200 Contract Services 0630-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Pier Renovation/Phase III 32,822.00 2,459.00 3,313.00 476.00 39,070.00 1,442,429.00 1,442,429.00 1,481,499.00 1,739.51 130.27 258.97 25.21 2,153.96 0.00 0.00 2,153.96 5,458.50 408.74 474.39 79.14 6,420.77 0.00 0.00 6,420.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,363.50 2,050.26 2,838.61 396.86 32,649.23 1,442,429.00 1,442,429.00 16.63 16.62 14.32 16.63 16.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,475,078.23 0.43 Total Tyco Fund 2,141,899.00 25,070.96 149,406.77 0.00 1.992.492.23 6.98 Page: 28 • expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1211/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 29 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 12994300 Materials/Supplies/Other •2994399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 4602 Comm Center Facilities Study 4602-4200 Contract Services 4602-4201 Contract Serv/Pdvate Total Comm Center Facilities Study 6101 Parks 61014200 Contract Services 61014201 Contract Serv/Private Total Parks 8507 Valley Park Improvements 85074200 Contract Services •85074201 Contract Serv/Pdvate Total Valley Park Improvements 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase III 8630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Pdvate Total Pier Renovation/Phase III Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prot Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 40,800.00 3,400.00 20,400.00 0.00 20,400.00 50.00 40,800.00 3,400.00 20,400.00 0.00 20,400.00 50.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 100.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 100.00 25,986.00 0.00 4,515.00 0.00 21,471.00 17.37 25,986.00 0.00 4,515.00 0.00 21,471.00 17.37 185,955.00 0.00 185,955.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 185,955.00 0.00 185,955.00 0.00 Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 280,241.00 3,400.00 24,915.00 • 2,500.00 252,826.00 9.78 Page: 29 expstat.rpt 02/0312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 30 136 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund Account Number 1219 Administrative Charges 1219-4200 Contract Services 4.2194201 Contract Serv/Private Total Administrative Charges 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 12994300 Materials/Supplies/Other 12994399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out Total Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1,763.00 57.08 485.65 0.00 1,277.35 27.55 1,763.00 57.08 485.65 0.00 1,277.35 27.55 1,021.00 85.00 510.00 0.00 511.00 49.95 1,021.00 85.00 510.00 0.00 511.00 49.95 2,784.00 142.08 995.65 0.00 1.788.35 35.76 Page: 30 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1211/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 31 137 Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund Account Number 1219 Administrative Charges 1219-4200 Contract Services 10219-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Administrative Charges 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1299-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out Total Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 5,718.00 80.30 2,652.02 0.00 3,065.98 46.38 5,718.00 80.30 2,652.02 0.00 3,065.98 46.38 2,959.00 2,959.00 247.00 247.00 1,482.00 1,482.00 0.00 0.00 1,477.00 50.08 1,477.00 50.08 8,677.00 327.30 4,134.02 0.00 4,542.98 47.64 Page: 31 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/112003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 32 138 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund Account Number 1219 Administrative Charges 1219-4200 Contract Services .219-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Administrative Charges 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1299-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prot Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 6,200.00 89.03 2,754.46 0.00 3,445.54 44.43 6,200.00 89.03 2,754.46 0.00 3,445.54 44.43 3,382.00 282.00 3,382.00 282.00 1,692.00 1,692.00 0.00 0.00 1,690.00 50.03 1,690.00 50.03 Total Loma Dist Admin Gro Fund 9,582.00 371.03 4,446.46 0.00 5.135.54 46.40 Page: 32 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 33 140 Community Dev Block Grant Account Number 4707 CDBG Program General Admin 47074100 Personal Services 074102 Regular Salaries 074180 Retirement 47074188 Employee Benefits 47074189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 47074200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prot Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 8,967.00 672.00 841.00 129.00 10,609.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4707-4201 Contract Serv/Pdvate 0.00 629.00 Total Contract Services 0.00 629.00 47074300 Materials/Supplies/Other 47074317 Training/Conference Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total CDBG Program General Admin 8147 Curb-Cut/Handicap Ramps 8147-4200 Contract Services *1474201 Contract Serv/Private Total Curb-Cut/Handicap Ramps 8622 ADA Compliance, City Hall 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,151.00 5,151.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,967.00 0.00 672.00 0.00 841.00 0.00 129.00 0.00 10,609.00 0.00 -5,151.00 0.00 -5,151.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 11,609.00 629.00 5,151.00 0.00 6,458.00 44.37 251,665.00 459.00 224,807.89 31,490.20 4,633.09 101.84 251,665.00 459.00 224,807.89 31,490.20 4,633.09 101.84 86224200 Contract Services 86224201 Contract Serv/Pdvate 19,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,000.00 0.00 Total ADA Compliance, City Hall 19,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,000.00 0.00 8626 ADA Comp/Comm Ctr Theatre 86264200 Contract Services Page: 33 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 34 140 Community Dev Block Grant Account Number 8626-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total ADA Comp/Comm Ctr Theatre Adjusted Appropriation Expenditures 216,774.00 216,774.00 Total Community Dev Block Grant 499,048.00 Year-to-date Year-to-date Expenditures Encumbrances 1,266.50 1,266.50 2,354.50 15,154.57 15,154.57 245,113.46 11,400.29 11,400.29 Prct Balance Used 190,219.14 12.25 190,219.14 12.25 42,890.49 211.044.05 57.71 Page: 34 expstat.rpt • 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 35 145 Proposition A Fund Account Number 3401 Dial A Ride 3401-4100 Personal Services 01.4102 Regular Salaries Total Personal Services 3401-4200 Contract Services 3401-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 34014300 Materials/Supplies/Other Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 32,235.00 2,604.80 15,366.55 0.00 32,235.00 2,604.80 15,366.55 0.00 16,868.45 47.67 16,868.45 47.67 217,094.00 0.00 57,232.77 0.00 159,861.23 26.36 217,094.00 0.00 57,232.77 0.00 159,861.23 26.36 34014305 Office Oper Supplies 850.00 0.00 8.58 0.00 841.42 1.01 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 850.00 0.00 8.58 0.00 841.42 1.01 Total Dial A Ride 250,179.00 2,604.80 72,607.90 0.00 177,571.10 29.02 3403 Bus Pass Subsidy 3403-4200 Contract Services 34034251 Contract Service/Govt 1,200.00 0.00 204.00 0.00 996.00 17.00 Total Bus Pass Subsidy 1,200.00 0.00 204.00 0.00 996.00 17.00 4/3404 Dial -A -Taxi Program 3404-4200 Contract Services 34044201 Contract Serv/Private 25,000.00 2,950.60 11,210.00 13,790.00 0.00 100.00 Total Dial -A -Taxi Program 25,000.00 2,950.60 11,210.00 13,790.00 0.00 100.00 3408 Commuter Express 34084100 Personal Services 3408-4102 Regular Salaries 1,365.00 97.26 624.46 0.00 740.54 45.75 Total Personal Services 1,365.00 97.26 624.46 0.00 740.54 45.75 Page: 35 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 36 145 Proposition A Fund Account Number 3408-4200 Contract Services 3408-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services Total Commuter Express Recreation Transportation •3409 Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 9,104.00 9,104.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,104.00 0.00 9,104.00 0.00 10,469.00 97.26 624.46 0.00 9,844.54 5.96 3409-4100 Personal Services 3409-4102 Regular Salaries 2,842.00 77.57 523.53 0.00 2,318.47 18.42 Total Personal Services 2,842.00 77.57 523.53 0.00 2,318.47 18.42 3409-4200 Contract Services 3409-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Recreation Transportation Total Proposition A Fund • 21,400.00 0.00 9,271.02 0.00 12,128.98 43.32 21,400.00 0.00 9,271.02 0.00 12,128.98 43.32 24,242.00 77.57 9,794.55 0.00 14,447.45 40.40 311,090.00 5,730.23 94,440.91 13,790.00 202,859.09 34.79 Page: 36 expstat.rpt 02103/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 37 146 Proposition C Fund Account Number 4208 Pavement Management Study 4208-4200 Contract Services 208-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Pavement Management Study 8174 Artesia Blvd Rehabilitation 8174-4200 Contract Services 8174-4201 Contract Serv/Pdvate Total Artesia Blvd Rehabilitation Total Proposition C Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 22,000.00 0.00 0.00 19,850.00 2,150.00 90.23 22,000.00 0.00 0.00 19,850.00 2,150.00 90.23 68,155.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,155.00 0.00 68,155.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,155.00 0.00 90,155.00 0.00 0.00 19,850.00 70,305.00 22.02 Page: 37 expstat.rpt 02/0312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 38 150 Grants Fund Account Number 2101 Police Department (OJP Equip Grant) 2101-5400 Equipment/Fumiture .101-5401 Equip -Less Than 31,000 Total Police Department (OJP Equip Grant) 2109 State Homeland Sec Grant/Police 2109-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 2109-5401 Equip -Less Than 31,000 Total State Homeland Sec Grant/Police 2112 Local Law Enf Block Grant (LLEBG) Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1,000.00 0.00 962.82 0.00 37.18 96.28 1,000.00 0.00 962.82 0.00 37.18 96.28 18,490.00 2,568.48 2,568.48 15,842.98 78.54 99.58 18,490.00 2,568.48 2,568.48 15,842.98 78.54 99.58 2112-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2112-5402 Equip -More Than 31,000 11,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,450.00 0.00 Total Local Law Enf Block Grant (LLEBG) 11,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,450.00 0.00 2201 Fre Department (0JP Equip Grant) 2201-5400 Equipment/Furniture .201-5401 Equip -Less Than 31,000 Total Fire Department (OJP Equip Grant) 2203 State Homeland Sec Grant/Fire 2203-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 2203-5401 Equip -Less Than 51,000 Total State Homeland Sec Grant/Fire 3102 Sewers/Beverage Recycle Grant 31024200 Contract Services 3,562.00 0.00 3,520.00 0.00 42.00 98.82 3,562.00 0.00 3,520.00 0.00 42.00 98.82 7,193.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,193.00 0.00 7,193.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,193.00 0.00 • Page: 38 • expstat.rpt 0210312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 39 150 Grants Fund Account Number 3102.4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Sewers/Beverage Recycle Grant 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase III *630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Pier Renovation/Phase III • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 8,965.00 379.95 2,412.31 6,553.45 -0.76 100.01 8,965.00 379.95 2,412.31 6,553.45 -0.76 100.01 324,000.00 0.00 324,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 324,000.00 0.00 324,000.00 0.00 Total Grants Fund 374,660.00 2,948.43 9,463.61 22,396.43 342.799.96 8.50 Page: 39 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 40 151 Ofc of Traffic Sfty Grant Fund Account Number 2108 Be Street Smart Hermosa Grant Prog 2108-4100 Personal Services 401084106 Regular Overtime Total Personal Services 21084300 Materials/Supplies/Other 21084317 Training/Conference Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2108-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2108-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Furniture • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 17,000.00 1,247.54 8,213.75 0.00 17,000.00 1,247.54 8,213.75 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 796.19 796.19 0.00 0.00 8,786.25 48.32 8,786.25 48.32 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 -796.19 0.00 -796.19 0.00 Total Ofc of Traffic Sftv Grant Fund 18,000.00 1,247.54 9,009.94 0.00 8.990.06 50.06 Page: 40 expstat.rpt 02103/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 41 152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Approprlation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 3701 Emission Control 37014300 Materials/Supplies/Other 47014327 AQMD Incentives 1,000.00 85.00 375.00 0.00 625.00 37.50 Total Air Quality Mamt Dist Fund 1,000.00 85.00 375.00 0.00 625.00 37.50 Page: 41 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 42 153 Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 11/099-4399 Operating Trsfr Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 2106 C.O.P.S. Program 2106-4200 Contract Services 2106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2106-4251 Contract Services/Govt Total Contract Services 2106-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2106-5401 Equip -Less Than 51,000 2106-5402 Equip -More Than 51,000 2106-5403 Vehicles Total Equipment/Fumiture 2106-5600 Buildings/Improvements .106-5602 Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs Total Buildings/Improvements Total C.O.P.S. Program Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 21 227 00 2,359.00 7,077.00 0.00 14,150.00 33.34 21,227.00 2,359.00 7,077.00 0.00 14,150.00 33.34 30,000.00 12,000.00 42,000.00 12,000.00 128,000.00 0.00 140,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,115.42 5,644.01 8,759.43 914.75 0.00 0.00 914.75 0.00 0.00 980.00 0.00 0.00 980.00 182,000.00 0.00 10,654.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 989.19 0.00 581.10 1,570.29 0.00 0.00 1,570.29 26,884.58 10.38 6,355.99 47.03 33,240.57 20.86 10,096.06 15.87 128,000.00 0.00 -581.10 0.00 137,514.96 1.78 -980.00 0.00 -980.00 0.00 169,775.53 6.72 Total Suoo Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) 203,227.00 2,359.00 17,731.18 1,570.29 183,925.53 9.50 Page: 42 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1211/2003 through 12131/2003 Page: 43 154 CA Law Enf Equip Prog Fund (CLEEP) Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 2107 High Technology Grant 21074200 Contract Servicesisk Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W107-5400 EquipmentlFumiture 2107-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 42,781.00 Total CA Law Ent Equip Pro' Fund (CLEEP) 42,781.00 • 0.00 0.00 6,330.39 36,450.61 14.80 0.00 0.00 6,330.39 36,450.61 14.80 Page: 43 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 44 156 Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prey (TRAP) Account Number 2115 T.RA.P.Taskforce 2115-4100 Personal Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prot Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1015-4102 Regular Salaries 64,424.00 5,201.92 31,211.52 0.00 33,212.48 48.45 15-4105 Special Duty Pay 5,112.00 425.62 2,553.72 0.00 2,558.28 49.96 2115-4106 Regular Overtime 38,000.00 0.00 2,410.65 0.00 35,589.35 6.34 2115-4111 Accrual Cash ln 0.00 0.00 3,181.08 0.00 -3,181.08 0.00 2115-4180 Retirement 27,401.00 2,283.40 13,700.40 0.00 13,700.60 50.00 2115-4187 Uniform Allowance 700.00 58.34 350.04 0.00 349.96 50.01 2115-4188 Employee Benefits 11,574.00 914.68 5,265.28 0.00 6,308.72 45.49 2115-4189 Medicare Benefits 989.00 82.46 540.89 0.00 448.11 54.69 Total Personal Services 148,200.00 8,966.42 59,213.58 0.00 88,986.42 39.96 2115-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Taskforce for Rep Autotheft Prey (TRAP) 148,200.00 8,966.42 59,213.58 0.00 88,986.42 39.96 Page: 44 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 45 160 Sewer Fund Account Number 3102 Sewers/Storm Drains 3102-4100 Personal Services 61024102 Regular Salaries 1024106 Regular Overtime 31024111 Accrual Cash In 31024180 Retirement 3102-4188 Employee Benefits 31024189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 31024200 Contract Services 31024201 Contract Serv/Pdvate 3102-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 31024300 Materials/Supplies/Other 31024303 Utilities 31024309 Maintenance Materials 31024395 Equip Replacement Charges 31024396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other •3102-5400 Equipment/Fumiture Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Sewers/Storm Drains 3105 Used Oil Block Grant 3105-4200 Contract Services 3105-4201 Contract Serv/Private Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 236,763.00 4,800.00 2,929.00 17,646.00 33,428.00 2,726.00 298,292.00 226,298.00 20,500.00 246,798.00 1,700.00 12,600.00 36,209.00 53,682.00 104,191.00 18,975.07 115,561.66 359.87 2,009.04 2,312.42 4,360.70 1,413.86 8,620.97 2,879.82 16,537.32 219.47 1,356.93 26,160.51 148,446.62 26,773.17 53,139.84 0.00 0.00 26,773.17 53,139.84 78.28 384.65 132.67 4,910.05 3,017.00 18,102.00 4,474.00 26,844.00 7,701.95 50,240.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 128,669.22 0.00 128,669.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121,201.34 48.81 2,790.96 41.86 -1,431.70 148.88 9,025.03 48.86 16,890.68 49.47 1,369.07 49.78 149,845.38 49.77 44,488.94 80.34 20,500.00 0.00 64,988.94 73.67 1,315.35 22.63 7,689.95 38.97 18,107.00 49.99 26,838.00 50.01 53,950.30 48.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 649,281.00 60,635.63 251,827.16 128,669.22 268,784.62 58.60 6,088.00 1,424.56 1,424.56 3,994.44 669.00 89.01 Total Used Oil Block Grant 6,088.00 1,424.56 1,424.56 3,994.44 669.00 89.01 Page: 45 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12131/2003 Page: 46 160 Sewer Fund Account Number 8189 St Improvements/Myrtle Area 8189-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used �89-4201 ContractServ/Private 37,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,000.00 0.00 Total St Improvements/Myrtle Area 37,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,000.00 0.00 8192 Various Street Improvements 8192-4100 Personal Services 8192-4102 Regular Salaries 8192-4180 Retirement 8192-4188 Employee Benefits 8192-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 8192-4200 Contract Services 8192-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Various Street Improvements 8409 Manhole Repairs .09.4200 Contract Services 8409-4201 Contract Sew/Private Total Manhole Repairs 8410 Sewer Rehab/Loma District 8410-4100 Personal Services t 8410-4102 Regular Salaries 8410-4180 Retirement 8410-4188 Employee Benefits 8410-4189 Medicare Benefits 6,826.00 511.00 689.00 100.00 8,126.00 552,018.00 552,018.00 861.45 64.53 81.80 12.49 1,020.27 45,629.30 45,629.30 7,378.36 552.63 501.43 106.98 8,539.40 492,492.04 492,492.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,314.18 30,314.18 -552.36 -41.63 187.57 -6.98 -413.40 108.09 108.15 72.78 106.98 105.09 29,211.78 94.71 29,211.78 94.71 560,144.00 46,649.57 501,031.44 30,314.18 28,798.38 94.86 250,264.00 0.00 950.00 0.00 249,314.00 0.38 250,264.00 0.00 950.00 0.00 249,314.00 0.38 6,826.00 511.00 689.00 100.00 276.90 20.74 40.90 4.02 4,075.58 309.92 429.14 60.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,750.42 59.71 201.08 60.65 259.86 62.28 39.97 60.03 Page: 46 expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 02/03/2004 6:41AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 47 160 Sewer Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used Total Personal Services 8,126.00 8410-4200 Contract Services 8410-4201 Contract Serv/Private • Total Contract SeMces Total Sewer Rehab/Loma District 8411 Sewer Rehab/Recons-Trgt Area 1 84114100 Personal Services 84114102 Regular Salaries 8411-4180 Retirement 84114188 Employee Benefits 8411-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 84114200 Contract SeMces 84114201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract SeMces 329,205.00 329,205.00 337,331.00 6,826.00 511.00 689.00 100.00 8,126.00 374,665.00 374,665.00 342.56 4,874.67 0.00 3,251.33 59.99 22,222.22 22,222.22 22,564.78 584.57 43.79 40.90 8.48 677.74 103,566.17 103,566.17 279,360.64 279,360.64 284,235.31 4,105.90 307.54 203.71 59.54 4,676.69 263,261.34 263,261.34 43,350.71 43,350.71 6,493.65 98.03 6,493.65 98.03 43,350.71 9,744.98 97.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,408.52 37,408.52 2,720.10 60.15 203.46 60.18 485.29 29.57 40.46 59.54 3,449.31 57.55 73,995.14 80.25 73,995.14 80.25 Total Sewer Rehab/Recons-Trgt Area 1 382,791.00 104,243.91 267,938.03 37,408.52 77,444.45 79.77 8412 Sewer Rehab/Recons-Trgt Area 2 124200 Contract Services 84124201 Contract Serv/Private 80,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,000.00 0.00 Total Sewer Rehab/Recons-Trgt Area 2 80,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,000.00 0.00 8418 Upgrade of Pump Stations Citywide 84184100 Personal Services 8418-4102 Regular Salaries 8418-4180 Retirement 84184188 Employee Benefits 8,439.00 632.00 851.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,439.00 632.00 85t00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 47 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 48 160 Sewer Fund Account Number 8418-4189 Flea Total Personal Services 8418-4200 Contract Services • 18-4201 Contract Serv/Pdvate Total Contract Services Total Upgrade of Pump Stations Citywide 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase 111 8630-4100 Personal Services 8630-4102 Regular Salaries 8630-4180 Retirement 8630-4188 Employee Benefits 8630-4189 Flea Total Personal Services 8630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Pdvate Total Contract Services Total Pier Renovation/Phase 111 Adjusted Appropriation 124.00 10,046.00 289,954.00 289,954.00 300,000.00 6,826.00 511.00 689.00 100.00 8,126.00 191,874.00 191,874.00 200,000.00 Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Year-to-date Encumbrances 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Prct Balance Used 124.00 0.00 10,046.00 0.00 289,954.00 0.00 289,954.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300,000.00 0.00 1,549.13 116.04 186.33 22.47 1,873.97 0.00 0.00 1,873.97 8,091.95 606.12 2,017.64 117.33 10,833.04 0.00 0.00 10,833.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,265.95 -95.12 -1,328.64 -17.33 -2,707.04 191,874.00 191,874.00 118.55 118.61 292.84 117.33 133.31 0.00 0.00 189,166.96 5.42 • Total Sewer Fund 2,802,899.00 237,392.42 1,318,239.54 243,737.07 1,240.922.39 55.73 Page: 48 • expstat.rpt 0210312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 49 170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other .2994399 Operating Transfers Out 40,500.00 3,375.00 20,250.00 0.00 20250.00 50.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 40,500.00 3,375.00 20,250.00 0.00 20,250.00 50.00 Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 40,500.00 3,375.00 20250.00 0.00 20.250.00 50.00 • Page: 49 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 50 180 Fire Protection Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 099-4399 Operating Transfers Out 125,749.00 10,479.00 62,874.00 0.00 62,875.00 50.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 125,749.00 10,479.00 62,874.00 0.00 62,875.00 50.00 2202 Fire Protection 2202-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 2202-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 2202-5402 Equip -More Than 51,000 Total Fire Protection 8610 Fire Sta Upstairs RemodeVAddn 8610-4200 Contract Services 5,179.00 78,074.00 83,253.00 0.00 2,504.52 2,504.52 2,305.82 23,207.44 25,513.26 0.00 16,142.10 16,142.10 2,873.18 38,724.46 41,597.64 44.52 50.40 50.03 8610-4201 Contract Serv/Private 169,417.00 0.00 3,698.15 17,927.75 147,791.10 12.76 Total Fire Sta Upstairs RemodeVAddn 169,417.00 0.00 3,698.15 17,927.75 147,791.10 12.76 Total Fire Protection Fund 378,419.00 12,983.52 92,085.41 34,069.85 252.263.74 33.34 Page: 50 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 51 301 Capital Improvement Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Pitt Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 8106 Beach Drive Underground Dist 8106-4200 Contract Services Total Beach Drive Underground Dist 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.109 Concrete Road Constnrctionwar locations 8109-4200 Contract Services 8109-4201 Contract Serv/Private 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 Total Concrete Road ConstructionNar locations 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 8110 Slurry Seal/Various Locations 8110-4200 Contract Services 8110-4201 Contract Serv/Private 120,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120,000.00 0.00 Total Slurry SeaWarious Locations 120,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120,000.00 0.00 8111 Prospect Undergrounding District 81114200 Contract Services Total Prospect Undergrounding District 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .185 5th Ardmo e/Prospct:Gentry/3rd-Prospct 8185-4100 Personal Services 8185-4102 Regular Salaries 8185-4180 Retirement 8185-4188 Employee Benefits 8185-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 736.12 55.14 72.71 10.67 874.64 9,744.89 729.90 1,401.99 141.32 12,018.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -9,744.89 0.00 -729.90 0.00 -1,401.99 0.00 -141.32 0.00 -12,018.10 0.00 8185-4200 Contract Services 8185-4201 ContractServ/Private 212,000.00 0.00 1,965.01 0.00 210,034.99 0.93 Page: 51 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 52 301 Capital Improvement Fund Account Number Total Contract Services Total 5th Ardmore/Prospd:Gentry/3rd-Prospct 8188 St Imp/10th Btwn Ocean/Prospct 188-4200 Contract Services 8188-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total St Imp/10th Btwn Ocean/Prospct 8189 St Improvements/Myrtle Area 8189-4100 Personal Services 8189-4102 Regular Salaries 8189-4180 Retirement 8189-4188 Employee Benefits 8189-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 8189-4200 Contract Services 8189-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract SeMces Total St Improvements/Myrtle Area St ImprovementsNarious #4 •8193 8193-4100 Personal SeMces 8193-4102 Regular Salaries 8193-4180 Retirement 8193-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 8193-4200 Contract SeMces 8193-4201 Contract Serv/Private Adjusted Appropriation 212,000.00 212,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 16,881.00 1,265.00 1,704.00 245.00 20,095.00 852,704.00 852,704.00 872,799.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures 0.00 874.64 0.00 0.00 830.70 62.22 81.80 12.05 986.77 0.00 0.00 986.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 266,530.00 0.00 1,965.01 13,983.11 0.00 0.00 8,583.72 642.95 778.49 124.46 10,129.62 4,060.32 4,060.32 14,189.94 307.67 23.04 4.46 335.17 Year-to-date Encumbrances Prct Balance Used 0.00 210,034.99 0.93 0.00 198,016.89 6.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,986.07 3,986.07 3,986.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 8,297.28 622.05 925.51 120.54 9,965.38 50.85 50.83 45.69 50.80 50.41 844,657.61 0.94 844,657.61 0.94 854,622.99 2.08 -307.67 0.00 -23.04 0.00 -4.46 0.00 -335.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 266,530.00 0.00 Page: 52 expstat.rpt 0210312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 53 301 Capital Improvement Fund Account Number Total Contract Services Total St ImprovementsNarious #4 8507 Valley Park Improvements *5074200 Contract Services 8507-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Valley Park Improvements 8622 ADA Compliance, City Hall 86224200 Contract Services 86224201 Contract Serv/Private Total ADA Compliance, City Hall 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase III 86304100 Personal Services 8630-4102 Regular Salaries 8630-4180 Retirement 8630-4188 Employee Benefits 8630-4189 Fica • Total Personal Services 8630-4200 Contract Services 86304201 Contract ServlPdvate Total Contract Services Total Pier Renovation/Phase III 8634 Exterior Painting/City Bldgs 86344200 Contract Services 8634-4201 Contract Serv/Private Adjusted Appropriation Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures Year-to-date Encumbrances Prct Balance Used 266,530.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 266,530.00 0.00 266,530.00 0.00 335.17 0.00 266,194.83 0.13 126,815.00 126,815.00 5,236.00 5,236.00 8,331.00 624.00 842.00 121.00 9,918.00 186,920.00 186,920.00 196,838.00 136.40 136.40 0.00 0.00 1,092.24 81.82 40.90 15.84 1,230.80 14,880.56 14,880.56 16,111.36 14,500.00 0.00 5,445.08 5,445.08 3,850.00 3,850.00 2,910.37 218.02 299.69 42.20 3,470.28 23,697.21 23,697.21 27,167.49 0.00 0.00 121,369.92 4.29 0.00 121,369.92 4.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 104,647.64 104,647.64 104,647.64 0.00 1,386.00 73.53 1,386.00 73.53 5,420.63 34.93 405.98 34.94 542.31 35.59 78.80 34.88 6,447.72 34.99 58,575.15 68.66 58,575.15 68.66 65,022.87 66.97 14,500.00 0.00 Page: 53 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 54 301 Capital Improvement Fund Account Number Total Exterior Painting/City Bldgs 8635 Community Center Shed Demolition 8635-4200 Contract Services 8635-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Community Center Shed Demolition Total Capital Improvement Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 14,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,500.00 0.00 35,000.00 35,000.00 1,969,718.00 0.00 0.00 18,109.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64,970.79 108,633.71 35,000.00 35,000.00 1,796,113.50 0.00 0.00 8.81 Page: 54 • expstat.rpt 0210312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 1213112003 Page: 55 307 Myrtle Util Undrgmd Impr Fund Account Number 8182 Util Undrgmd/Myrtle Ave Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 81824200 Contract Services •8182-4201 Contract Serv/Private 5,407.00 0.00 5,439.42 0.00 -32.42 100.60 Total Myrtle Util Undrgmd Impr Fund 5,407.00 0.00 5,439.42 0.00 -32.42 100.60 Page: 55 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 56 309 Bayview Drive Underground District Account Number 8104 Bayview Dr Underground Dist 8104-4200 Contract Services 01044201 Contract Serv/Private Total Bayview Drive Underground District Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prot Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Page: 56 expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 02/0312004 6:41AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 57 311 Beach Drive Underground District Fund Account Number 8106 Beach Drive Underground Dist 8106-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prot Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used •8106-4201 ContractSenlPrivate 4,276.00 8,136.31 11,320.62 2,955.63 -10,000.25 333.87 Total Beach Drive Underground District Fund 4,276.00 8,136.31 11,320.62 2,955.63 -10.000.25 333.87 • Page: 57 expstat.rpt 02/0312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 58 312 Prospect Undergrounding District Fund Account Number 8111 Prospect Undergrounding District 81114200 Contract Services •81114201 Contract Serv/Private Total Prospect Underprounding District Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Page: 58 expstat.rpt 0210312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 59 705 Insurance Fund Account Number 1209 liability Insurance 1209-4100 Personal Services 1209-4102 Regular Salaries 209-4111 Accrual Cash In 1209-4180 Retirement 1209-4188 Employee Benefits 1209-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1209-4200 Contract Services 1209-4201 Contract Seri/Private Total Contract Services 1209-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1209-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1209-4315 Membership 1209-4317 Conference/Training 1209-4324 Claims/Settlements Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Liability Insurance •1210 Auto/Property/Bonds 1210-4200 Contract Services 1210-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 1210-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1210-4324 Claims/Settlements Total Materials/Supplies/Other Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 40,355.00 2,556.00 2,944.00 5,635.00 598.00 52,088.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 500.00 345.00 3,200.00 350,000.00 354,045.00 3,173.71 0.00 231.20 471.30 47.15 3,923.36 0.00 0.00 22.83 0.00 0.00 41,184.14 41,206.97 21,308.81 0.00 1,556.86 2,784.94 315.87 25,966.48 285,742.00 285,742.00 48.82 100.00 0.00 96,324.43 96,473.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,046.19 2,556.00 1,387.14 2,850.06 282.13 26,121.52 52.80 0.00 52.88 49.42 52.82 49.85 4,258.00 98.53 4,258.00 98.53 451.18 245.00 3,200.00 253,675.57 257,571.75 9.76 28.99 0.00 27.52 27.25 696,133.00 45,130.33 408,181.73 0.00 287,951.27 58.64 50,640.00 50,640.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,363.00 38,363.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,277.00 75.76 12,277.00 75.76 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 Total Auto/Property/Bonds 60,640.00 0.00 38,363.00 0.00 22,277.00 63.26 Page: 59 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 60 705 Insurance Fund Account Number 1215 Unemployment 1215-4100 Personal Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prof Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used •1215-4186 Unemployment Claims 10,000.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 9,920.00 0.80 Total Unemployment 10,000.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 9,920.00 0.80 1217 Workers' Compensation 12174100 Personal Services 1217-4102 Regular Salaries 12174111 Accrual Cash In 1217-4180 Retirement 12174188 Employee Benefits 12174189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 12174200 Contract Services 12174201 Contract Serv/Private 12174251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 12174300 Materials/Supplies/Other • 12174305 Office Oper Supplies 12174317 Training/Conference 12174324 Claims/Settlements Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Workers' Compensation 40,355.00 2,556.00 2,944.00 5,636.00 598.00 52,089.00 88,500.00 5,000.00 93,500.00 500.00 2,500.00 500,000.00 503,000.00 648,589.00 3,173.75 0.00 231.20 471.31 47.15 3,923.41 6,952.50 0.00 6,952.50 2.77 0.00 63,304.66 63,307.43 74,183.34 21,309.06 0.00 1,556.86 2,784.98 315.87 25,966.77 72,131.50 0.00 72,131.50 12.61 0.00 386,740.24 386,752.85 484,851.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,045.94 52.80 2,556.00 0.00 1,387.14 52.88 2,851.02 49.41 282.13 52.82 26,122.23 49.85 0.00 16,368.50 81.50 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 21,368.50 77.15 0.00 487.39 2.52 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 113,259.76 77.35 0.00 116,247.15 76.89 0.00 163,737.88 74.75 Total Insurance Fund 1,415,362.00 119,313.67 931,475.85 0.00 483,886.15 65.81 Page: 60 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1211/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 61 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 1202 Finance Administration 1202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other •12023310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 12023311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 12024900 Depredation 12024902 DepredationNehides Total Depreciation Total Finance Administration 1206 Information Systems 12064100 Personal Services 1206-4102 Regular Salaries 1206-4111 Acaual Cash In 1206-4180 Retirement 1206-4188 Employee Benefits 1206-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services • 1206-4200 Contract Services 12064201 Contract Serv/Pdvate Total Contract Services 1206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1206-4304 Telephone 1206-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1206-4309 Maintenance Materials 1206-4315 Membership 12064317 Conference/Training Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 76.00 370.00 446.00 2,205.00 2,205.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.15 27.98 33.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.85 6.78 342.02 7.56 412.87 7.43 2,205.00 0.00 2,205.00 0.00 2,651.00 0.00 33.13 0.00 2,617.87 1.25 113,856.00 3,156.00 8,528.00 9,488.00 1,650.00 136,678.00 137,165.00 137,165.00 5,884.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 300.00 45,000.00 9,488.00 56,928.00 0.00 2,408.49 710.64 4,263.88 853.20 4,759.98 137.56 860.32 11,189.40 69,220.67 1,675.65 60,882.29 1,675.65 60,882.29 568.71 1,915.03 1.86 4,106.25 1,569.71 3,194.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,908.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56,928.00 747.51 4,264.12 4,728.02 789.68 67,457.33 50.00 76.31 50.00 50.17 52.14 50.65 23,152.50 53,130.21 61.27 23,152.50 53,130.21 61.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,968.97 393.75 1,305.44 300.00 40,091.30 32.55 91.25 70.99 0.00 10.91 Page: 61 expstat.rpt 02/0312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 62 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 1206-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1206-4900 Depredation •1206-4901 Depreciation/MadVEquipment Total Depredation 1206-5400 EquipmenVFumiture 1206-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 1206-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Information Systems 1208 General Appropriations 1208-4900 Depredation 1208-4901 Depredation/Mach/Equipment Total Depredation 1208-5400 Equipment/Tumid/re 1208-5402 EquIp-More Than $1,000 • Total Equipment/Fumiture Total General Appropriations 1299 Interfund Transfers Out Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 4,535.00 378.00 2,268.00 0.00 2,267.00 50.01 64,719.00 2,518.28 16,392.54 0.00 48,326.46 25.33 61,137.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61,137.00 0.00 61,137.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61,137.00 0.00 4,800.00 91,666.00 96,466.00 0.00 2,663.23 2,663.23 2,080.13 61,464.53 63,544.66 0.00 1,884.84 1,884.84 2,719.87 43.34 28,316.63 69.11 31,036.50 67.83 496,165.00 18,046.56 210,040.16 25,037.34 261,087.50 47.38 1,189.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,189.00 0.00 1,189.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,189.00 0.00 36,760.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,760.00 0.00 36,760.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,760.00 0.00 37,949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,949.00 0.00 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out 63,901.00 5,325.00 31,950.00 0.00 31,951.00 50.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 63,901.00 5,325.00 31,950.00 0.00 31,951.00 50.00 2101 Police 2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Page: 62 expstat.rpt 0210312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12131/2003 Page: 63 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 2101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 2101-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2101.4900 Depredation •2101.4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 21014902 DepredationNehldes Total Depredation 2101-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 2101-5402 Equip -More Than 31,000 2101-5403 Vehicles Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Police 2201 Fire 22014200 Contract Services 22014201 Contract Serv/Pdvate Total Contract Services 22014300 Materials/Supplies/Other • 22014310 Motor Fuels Md Lubes 22014311 Auto Maintenance Total Matedals/Supplies/Other 22014900 Depreciation 22014901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 22014902 DepredationNehides Total Depredation 2201-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 2201-5402 Equip -More Than 31,000 Adjusted Appropriation Expenditures 34,000.00 35,000.00 69,000.00 18,698.00 146,892.00 165,590.00 32,583.00 143,450.00 176,033.00 410,623.00 30,770.00 30,770.00 10,645.00 8,002.00 18,647.00 100.00 73,269.00 73,369.00 Year-to-date Expenditures 3,130.32 4,772.10 7,902.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,740.33 41,740.33 49,642.75 0.00 0.00 350.34 79.83 430.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,376.23 14,713.24 34,089.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,098.52 41,740.33 69,838.85 103,928.32 0.00 0.00 3,433.33 1,039.61 4,472.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 Year-to-date Encumbrances 0.00 617.03 617.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,125.80 1,324.67 2,450.47 3,067.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 568.31 568.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 Prct Balance Used 14,623.77 19,669.73 34,293.50 18,698.00 146,892.00 165,590.00 3,358.68 100,385.00 103,743.68 56.99 43.80 50.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 89.69 30.02 41.07 303,627.18 26.06 30,770.00 0.00 30,770.00 0.00 7,211.67 6,394.08 13,605.75 100.00 73,269.00 73,369.00 32.25 20.09 27.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,965.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,965.00 0.00 Page: 63 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 64 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 2201-5403 Vehicles Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Fire •2601 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 2601-4200 Contract Services 2601-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 2601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 2601-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2601-4900 Depredation 26014902 Depreciation/Vehicles Total Depreciation 2601-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2601-5403 Vehicles • Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 3102 Sewers/Storm Drains 31024200 Contract Services 31024201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 31024300 Materials/Supplies/Other 31024309 Maintenance Materials 31024310 Motor Fuels And Lubes Adjusted Appropriation 184,372.00 191,337.00 314,123.00 Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures 0.00 0.00 430.17 5,895.06 5,895.06 10,368.00 Year-to-date Encumbrances 4,511.56 4,511.56 5,079.87 Prct Balance Used 173,965.38 5.64 180,930.38 5.44 298,675.13 4.92 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 2,600.00 1,560.00 4,160.00 123.03 3.43 126.46 1,121.68 852.26 1,973.94 0.00 1,478.32 43.14 0.00 707.74 54.63 0.00 2,186.06 47.45 29,760.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,760.00 0.00 29,760.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,760.00 0.00 82,112.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82,112.00 0.00 82,112.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82,112.00 0.00 119,032.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,000.00 126.46 0.00 0.00 36.47 1,800.00 139.63 1,973.94 2,640.48 2,640.48 89.20 503.31 0.00 117,058.06 1.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,359.52 66.01 1,359.52 66.01 1,910.80 4.46 1,296.69 27.96 Page: 64 , expstat.rpt 02/0312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 65 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 3102-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3102-4900Depredation .102-4902 DepredationNehides Total Depredation Total Sewers/Storm Drains 3104 Traffic Safety/SL Maint 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3104-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 3104-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3104-4900 Depredation 3104-4902 DepredationNehides Total Depreciation Total Traffic Safety/St Maint. 3302 Community Services • 3302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 33024310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 3302-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 33024900 Depredation Adjusted Appropriation 2,300.00 6,100.00 20,392.00 20,392.00 30,492.00 2,850.00 1,600.00 4,450.00 15,249.00 15,249.00 19,699.00 5,200.00 10,000.00 15,200.00 Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures 67.87 243.97 0.00 0.00 243.97 261.24 0.00 261.24 0.00 0.00 261.24 737.83 509.67 1,247.50 33024902 DepredationNehides 22,412.00 0.00 Total Depredation 22,412.00 0.00 3302-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 3302-5402 Equip -More Than 51,000 4,763.00 0.00 204.03 796.54 0.00 0.00 3,437.02 1,522.02 511.21 2,033.23 0.00 0.00 2,033.23 3,273.37 4,177.52 7,450.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 Year-to-date Encumbrances 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 241.65 241.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 Prct Balance Used 2,095.97 8.87 5,303.46 13.06 20,392.00 0.00 20,392.00 0.00 27,054.98 11.27 1,327.98 53.40 1,088.79 31.95 2,416.77 45.69 15,249.00 0.00 15,249.00 0.00 17,665.77 10.32 1,926.63 62.95 5,580.83 44.19 7,507.46 50.61 22,412.00 0.00 22,412.00 0.00 4,763.00 0.00 Page: 65 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 66 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 3302-5403 Vehicles Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Community Services 44201 Community Dev/Building 42014300 Materials/Supplies/Other 42014310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 42014311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 42014900 Depredation 42014902 DepredationNehides Total Depredation Total Community DevBullding 4202 Public Works Administration 42024300 Materials/Supplies/Other 42024310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 42024311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other •42024900 Depredation • 42024902 DepreciationNehldes Total Depredation 4202-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 4202-5403 Vehicles Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Public Works Administration 4204 Building Maintenance Adjusted Appropriation Expenditures 57,264.00 62,027.00 99,639.00 1,200.00 450.00 1,650.00 8,205.00 8,205.00 9,855.00 1200.00 1,200.00 2,400.00 8,563.00 8,563.00 24,330.00 24,330.00 35,293.00 Year-to-date Year-to-date Expenditures Encumbrances 0.00 0.00 1,247.50 77.61 44.67 122.28 0.00 0.00 122.28 28.96 5.73 34.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.69 56,819.19 56,819.19 64,270.08 543.18 568.26 1,111.44 0.00 0.00 1,111.44 516.26 287.22 803.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 803.48 0.00 0.00 241.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Prct Balance Used 444.81. 99.22 5,207.81 91.60 35,127.27 64.75 656.82 -118.26 538.56 45.27 126.28 67.36 8,205.00 0.00 • 8,205.00 0.00 8,743.56 11.28 683.74 43.02 912.78 23.94 1,596.52 33.48 8,563.00 0.00 8,563.00 0.00 24,330.00 0.00 24,330.00 0.00 34,489.52 2.28 Page: 66 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 67 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4204-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 4204-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 700.00 1.000.00 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.68 185.04 284.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 600.32 814.96 1,415.28 14.24 18.50 16.75 4204-4900 Depredation 4204-4902 DepredationNehides 3,465.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,465.00 0.00 Total Depredation 3,465.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,465.00 0.00 Total Building Maintenance 5,165.00 0.00 284.72 0.00 4,880.28 5.51 4206 Equipment Service 4206-4100 Personal SeMces 4206-4102 Regular Salaries 4206-4106 Regular Overtime 42064111 Accrual Cash In 4206-4112 PartTime/Temporary 4206-4180 Retirement 42064188 Employee Benefits 4206-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal SeMces •42064200 Contract Services 4206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4206-4251 Contrail SeMces/Govt Total Contract Services 4206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4206-4309 Maintenance Materials 4206-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 4206-4311 Auto Maintenance 4206-4396 Insurance User Charges 86,235.00 3,000.00 5,707.00 19,000.00 6,729.00 11,318.00 1,813.00 133,802.00 9,500.00 350.00 9,850.00 3,500.00 1,600.00 1,000.00 13,245.00 5,276.81 0.00 0.00 2,950.08 397.17 641.19 225.67 9,490.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 433.80 0.00 0.00 1,104.00 47,112.26 479.75 4,997.52 2,950.08 3,549.61 5,345.18 496.24 64,930.64 849.93 0.00 849.93 1,094.47 0.00 318.35 6,624.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 597.54 0.00 597.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39 122 74 2,520.25 709.48 16,049.92 3,179.39 5,972.82 1,316.76 68,871.36 8,052.53 350.00 8,402.53 2,405.53 1,600.00 681.65 6,621.00 54.63 15.99 87.57 15.53 52.75 47.23 27.37 48.53 15.24 0.00 14.70 31.27 0.00 31.84 50.01 Page: 67 expstat.rpt 02103/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 68 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used Total Materials/Supplies/Other 19,345.00 1,537.80 8,036.82 0.00 11,308.18 41.54 4206-4900 Depredation 4206-4901 Depredation/Mach/Equipment 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 • Total Depredation 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 4206-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 4206-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 4206-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Equipment Service 4601 Community Resources 4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 4601-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4601-4900 Depredation 46014902 Depredation/Vehides Total Depredation •4601-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 4601-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Community Resources 6101 Parks 6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 6101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 61014311 Auto Maintenance 900.00 2,000.00 2,900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,026.09 1,026.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 973.91 1,873.91 0.00 51.30 35.38 166,897.00 11,028.72 74,843.48 597.54 91,455.98 45.20 800.00 2,500.00 3,300.00 5,656.00 5,656.00 6,965.00 6,965.00 95.77 0.00 95.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 472.92 21.97 494.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 327.08 59.12 2,478.03 0.88 2,805.11 15.00 5,656.00 0.00 5,656.00 0.00 6,965.00 0.00 6,965.00 0.00 15,921.00 95.77 494.89 0.00 15,426.11 3.11 2,000.00 209.02 1,125.95 0.00 874.05 56.30 800.00 0.00 117.47 0.00 682.53 14.68 Page: 68 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 69 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,800.00 209.02 1,243.42 0.00 1556.58 44.41 6101-4900 Depreciation •61014902 DepreciationNehides Total Depredation Total Parks 8622 ADA Compliance, City Hall 8622.4200 Contract Services 8622-4201 Contract Serv/Pdvate Total ADA Compliance, City Hall Total Equipment Replacement Fund 7,243.00 7,243.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,243.00 0.00 7,243.00 0.00 10,043.00 209.02 1,243.42 0.00 8,799.58 12.38 0.00 0.00 1,837,448.00 Grand Total 37,324,400.00 0.00 4,911.13 0.00 4,911.13 86,814.13 511,726.44 2,356,400.46 14,504,288.19 0.00 -4,911.13 0.00 0.00 -4,911.13 0.00 34,023.90 1,291.697.66 29.70 1,603,311.84 21,216,799.97 43.16 Page: 69 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 70 Account Number 001 General Fund General Fund • Total 105 Lightg&Landscapg Dist Fund LightglLandscapg Dist Fund Total 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund Downtown Enhancement Fund Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 18,798,876.00 1,359,885.14 8,436,727.76 651,797.61 9,710,350.63 48.35 586,118.00 39,736.50 246,610.80 0.00 339,507.20 42.08 1,343,250.00 121,188.84 329,956.83 306,582.14 706,711.03 47.39 229,239.58 1,412,005.72 26,936.41 1,483,581.87 49.24 Total 110 Parking Fund Parking Fund 2,922,524.00 Total •115 State Gas Tax Fund State Gas Tax Fund 355,488.00 29,624.00 177,744.00 0.00 177,744.00 50.00 r Total 117 AB939 Fund AB939 Fund Total 119 Compensated Absences Fund 213,519.00 23,472.69 33,727.43 85,247.92 94,543.65 55.72 Page: 70 • t expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12131/2003 Page: 71 Account Number Compensated Absences Fund Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 148,972.00 12,414.00 74,484.00 0.00 74,488.00 50.00 Total 20 County Gas Tax Fund County Gas Tax Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 121 Prop A Open Space Fund Prop A Open Space Fund Total 122 Tyco Fund Tyco Fund Total 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 280,241.00 3,400.00 24,915.00 2,500.00 252,826.00 9.78 • Total 126 4% Utility Users Tax Fund 162,280.00 1,713.00 10,278.00 0.00 152,002.00 6.33 2,141,899.00 25,070.96 149,406.77 0.00 1,992,492.23 6.98 4% Utility Users Tax Fund ' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 127 Building Improvement Fund Building Improvement Fund Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 71 expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 72 Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 136 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund •37 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 2,784.00 - 142.08 995.65 0.00 1,788.35 35.76 Total Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund Total 138 Lorna Dist Admin Exp Fund Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund Total 140 Community Dev Block Grant Community Dev Block Grant Total 145 Proposition A Fund • Proposition A Fund Total 146 Proposition C Fund Proposition C Fund 8,677.00 327.30 4,134.02 0.00 4,542.98 47.64 9,582.00 371.03 4,446.46 0.00 5,135.54 46.40 499,048.00 2,354.50 245,113.46 42,890.49 211,044.05 57.71 311,090.00 5,730.23 94,440.91 13,790.00 202,859.09 34.79 90,155.00 0.00 0.00 19,850.00 70,305.00 22.02 Total 150 Grants Fund Grants Fund 374,660.00 2,948.43 9,463.61 22,396.43 342,799.96 8.50 Page: 72 a •expstat.rpt 02103/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 73 Account Number Total 151 Ofc of Traffic Sfty Grant Fund • Ofc of Traffic Sfty Grant Fund Total 152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund Total 153 Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) Total 154 CA Law Enf Equip Prog Fund (CLEEP) CA Law Enf Equip Prog Fund (CLEEP) Total 156 Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prev (TRAP) Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prev (TRAP) Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 18,000.00 1,247.54 9,009.94 0.00 8,990.06 50.06 1,000.00 85.00 375.00 0.00 625.00 37.50 203,227.00 2,359.00 17,731.18 1,570.29 183,925.53 9.50 42,781.00 0.00 0.00 6,330.39 36,450.61 14.80 148,200.00 8,966.42 59,213.58 0.00 88,986.42 39.96 Total 160 Sewer Fund Sewer Fund 2,802,899.00 237,392.42 1,318,239.54 243,737.07 1,240,922.39 55.73 Total Page: 73 expstat.rpt 0210312004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/1/2003 through 12/31/2003 Page: 74 Account Number 170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund Asset Seizure/Fortt Fund Total • 180 Fire Protection Fund Fire Protection Fund Total 301 Capital Improvement Fund Capital Improvement Fund Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 40,500.00 3,375.00 20,250.00 0.00 20,250.00 50.00 378,419.00 12,983.52 92,085.41 34,069.85 252,263.74 33.34 1,969,718.00 18,109.17 64,970.79 108,633.71 1,796,113.50 8.81 Total 302 Artesia Blvd Relinquishment Artesia Blvd Relinquishment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 307 Myrtle Util Undrgmd Impr Fund • Myrtle U01 Undrgmd Impr Fund 5,407.00 0.00 5,439.42 0.00 -32.42 100.60 Total 308 Loma Util Undrgmd Improv Fund Lorna UM Undrgmd Improv Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 309 Bayview Drive Underground District Bayview Drive Underground District 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Page: 74 1 • • • . expstat.rpt 02/03/2004 6:41AM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1211/2003 through 12/3112003 Page: 75 Account Number Total 311 Beach Drive Underground District Fund • Beach Drive Underground District Fund Total 312 Prospect Undergrounding District Fund Prospect Undergrounding District Fund Total 705 Insurance Fund Insurance Fund Total 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Equipment Replacement Fund Total Grand Total Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 4,276.00 8,136.31 11,320.62 2,955.63 -10,000.25 333.87 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 1,415,362.00 119,313.67 931,475.85 0.00 483,886.15 65.81 1,837,448.00 86,814.13 511,726.44 34,023.90 1,291,697.66 29.70 37,324,400.00 2,356,400.46 14,504,288.19 1,603,311.84 21,216,799.97 38.86 Page: 75 - TREASURER'S REPORT - Dec -03 FUND NUMBER FUND NAME GENERAL ACCOUNT it/2003 BALANCE • CASH ADJUSTMENT CHECKS ADJUSTMENT 12/31/2003 BALANCE 001 GENERAL 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 110 PARKING 115 STATE GAS TAX 117 A8939 119 COMPENSATED ABSENCES 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE 122 TYCO 125 PARK REC FAC TAX 126 RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY 127 BUILDING IMPROVMENT 136 LOWER PIER ADMIN EXPENSE 137 MYRTLE ADMIN EXPENSE 138 LOMA ADMIN EXPENSE 140 COMM DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 145 PROPOSITION A 146 PROPOSITION C 150 GRANTS 151 OFC OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT _ 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DISTRICT 153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENF SERVICES 154 CA LAW ENF EQUIPMENT PROGRAM 158 TASK FORCE FOR REG AUTOTHEFT PREV 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 170 ASSET SEIZURE 180 FIRE PROTECTION 199 CONTINGENCY 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 302 ARTESIA BLVD. RELINQUISHMENT 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPROV 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDERGROUND IMPROV 308 LOMA UTIL UNDERGRND IMPROV 309 BAYVIEW DRIVE UNDERGROUND DISTRICT 310 BONNIE BRAE UNDERGROUND DISTRICT 311 BEACH DRIVE UNDERGROUND DISTRICT 312 ARTESIA/PCH/6TH UNDRGRND DIST FUND 610 LOWER PIER DISTRICT REDEMP 617 MYRTLE REDEMPTION 618 LOMA REDEMPTION 705 INSURANCE 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 900 INVESTMENT TOTAL GENERAL ACCOUNT 5379,041.50 ($10,345.57) $780,654.09 5188.177.21 (516.264.13) $423,728.00 $271,093.61 $205.77 (29,119.25) $1,795,877.41 $169,190.19 $29,213.15 $3,821.55 ($590.85) $2,279.24 $4,487.01 ($254,807.96) $149,008.54 $797,072.91 ($420,774.76) ($2,496.64) $399.23 188188.52 $43,052.95 ($83,271.20) $1,473,373.13 $163,796.90 $435,577.47 $2,957,933.83 $2,162,158.18 $514,266.30 $69,703.88 $4,570.59 $97,918.26 $0.00 $0.00 $1,091.94 $0.00 $5,452.27 $30,604.52 $27,296.65 $3.818,672.26 $2,313,911.73 $0.00 $2,881,950.89 $179,223.30 $54,510.16 $130,470.24 $26,269.97 $4,892.50 $6,896.00 (57.08) (80.30) (89.03) $13,542.00 $24,168.28 $19,745.12 $142,000.00 $5,609.01 $8,070.58 $5,433.00 $15,832.69 $39,742.73 $46,494.60 $2,000.00 $382,661.18 $3,891.00 $3,328.00 $32,454.87 $29,010.37 $118.00 $2,806.70 9,083.13 $9,919.96 (1,032.398.43) (33,371.54) (121,107.84) (92,975.54) (23,747.94) (1,526.24) (7,000.00) ($2,354.50) (5,718.85) (2.948.43) $5,810.19 (856.80) $5,694.12 (83.89) $3,952.48 (6.631.12) $66,648.00 (227,311.21) (2,504.52) $22,917.00 (18,933.63) $7.97 $130,679.15 $102,537.00 (8,136.31) (135,075.20) (88,520.31) (597,819.41) (9,302.76) (1,732.14) (159,496.47) (29,625.37) ($159.24) ($12,414.00) (1,713.00) ($23,204.37) (3,417.62) (2.99) (0.39) (85.00) (247.00) (282.00) (16.23) ($79.69) ($5,810.42) ($5,694.63) ($2.368.22) ($4.39) ($2,285.40) ($9,364.07) ($3,392.03) ($10,524.13) ($301.35) (482.14) (52.39) (7.10) (0.47) (9.98) (2,806.70) (9,091.10) (9,919.96) (829.52) (8,016.40) 52.013,435.73 $130,094.43 $715,652.27 $98,630.31 $9,390.84 $404,831.32 $258,679.61 $205.77 ($30,832.25) $1,771,146.80 $165,668.57 $29,210.18 $3,821.16 $2,073.77 $11,035.07 $14,035.94 ($243,620.46) $167,439.94 $816,738.34 ($281,723.19) ($3,353.47) $5,923.84 $185,820.30 $43,048.56 ($88,235.24) $1,311,416.43 $180,404.87 $427,981.82 $2,957,632.48 $2,165,659.41 $514,213.91 $69,696.78 $4,570.12 $97,908.28 $0.00 $0.00 ($7,044.37) $0.00 $18,478.26 $61,264.12 $63,871.29 $3,815,446.69 $2,321,912.02 $000 $18,484,146.43 $3,606,624.88 $811,519.12 ($1,809,201.90) TRUST ACCOUNTS BALANCE 12/12003 DEPOSITS CHARGES BALANCE 12/31/2003 PAYROLL CABLE TV DEPOSIT TOTAL TRUST ACCOUNTS TOTAL ALL ACCOUNTS INVESTMENTS $97,909.11 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $3,000.00 $1,000,293.11 ($1,002,133.11) $10,000.00 $1,160.00 $10,000.00 $13,000.00 $1,000,293.11 JOHN MAN, CITY TREASURER ($1,002,133.11) $11,160.00 $20,193,690.23 (910,558.08) $20,182,530.23 BANK BALANCES GENERAL TRUST ACCTS OUTSTANDING CHECKS INVESTMENTS BALANCE $613,915.97 $14,685.13 $628,601.10 ($334,440.57) $294,160.53 $19.899,529.70 $20,193.690.23 2 d(2) January 27, 2004 Honorable Mayor City Council Meeting and Members of the City Council of February 10, 2004 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. Attached is a report of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of December 2003. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, M. Wo man Treasurer NOTED: ..834 Steph "r"ell Viki Copeland City Manager Finance Director NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: 2dc3) INSTITUTION LAIF INVESTMENT REPORT Dec -03 RATE DATE OF DATE OF ORIGINAL MARKET * FACE/PAR OF % WEIGHTED BOOK VALUE INVESTMENT MATURITY COST VALUE VALUE INTEREST TOTAL YIELD 12/1/2003 516,191,187.75 51,700,000.00 12/31/2003 517,891,187.75 517,891,187.75 1.560% 89.945% 1.403% • U.S. GOVT AGENCY BONDS/NOTES Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 5501,618.26 3/27/2002 5/15/2004 5511,642.50 5507,190.00 5500,000.00 5.000% 2.514% 0.126% Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 5502,504.98 4/25/2002 5/15/2004 $511,642.50 5507,190.00 $500,000.00 5.000% 2.514% 0.126% Federal Nat'l Mtg Corp 5502,623.29 5/22/2002 8/15/2004 5509,430.00 5510,000.00 5500,000.00 4.500% 2.514% 0.113% Federal Home Loan 5501,595.42 11/5/2003 2/15/2006 5501,690.00 5503,125.00 5500,000.00 2.375% 2.514% INVESTMENT TOTAL 519,899,529.70 52,034,405.00 52,027,505.00 $19,891,187.75 100.00% 1.768% In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months. Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. • RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, • January 29, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council February 10, 2004 ADOPTION OF ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2004 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the annual statement of investment policy for calendar year 2004. BACKGROUND Government Code section 53646 requires the filing of an annual Statement of Investment Policy by local public agencies. ANALYSIS With safety as a focus and the primary concem being the security of principal, the investments described will continue to earn current reasonable returns. Respectfully submitted, Aft/. _/ d ePf� � Workman Ci reasurer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director NOTED: St en R. Burrell City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • • RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT, FILING AND APPROVAL OF THE ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY AND DELEGATING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE CITY TREASURER FOR THE YEAR 2004 WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53646 requires the filing of an annual Statement of Investment Policy by local public agencies; and WHEREAS, the City Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach has rendered the following Statement of Investment Policy to this City Council for the calendar year 2004: PURPOSE: This statement is intended to provide a guideline for the prudent investment of temporary idle cash, trust funds and restricted moneys and to outline a policy for maximizing the efficiency of the cash management system. Ultimate investment goals include the enhancement of economic status and the protection of pooled cash investments. OBJECTIVE: The cash management system of the City of Hermosa Beach is designed to accurately monitor and forecast expenditures and revenues, thus insuring the investment of moneys to the fullest extent possible. The city attempts to obtain highest interest yields possible as long as investments meet the criteria required for safety and liquidity. POLICY: The City of Hermosa Beach operates its investment program with State and self- imposed constraints. It does not buy stocks; it does not speculate; it does not deal in futures, options or security loan agreements. With regard to investment companies, the City will deal only with investment companies registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The City Treasurer will have sole discretion over Security Trading, except in the case of monies invested in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund(LAIF) and the Los Angeles County Pooled Investment fund(LACPIF). Longer term investments (over one year) are generally limited to maturates of 3 years or less, but will never exceed five years. 1 F:B95TINANCEMES004.DOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • • Criteria for selecting investments and the absolute order of priority are: 1. Safety: The safety and risk associated with an investment refers to the potential loss of principal, interest or a combination of these amounts. Since it is the primary duty and responsibility of the Treasurer to protect, preserve and maintain cash and investments placed in his/her trust on behalf of the citizens of the City, Hermosa Beach only invests in those instruments that are considered very safe. 2. Liquidity: This refers to the ability to "cash in" at any moment in time with minimal chance of losing some portion of the principal or interest. An adequate percentage of the portfolio should be maintained in liquid short-term investments which can be converted to cash if necessary to meet disbursement requirements. Since all cash requirements cannot be anticipated, investments in securities with active secondary or resale markets is highly recommended. Emphasis should be on marketable securities with low sensitivity to market risk. 3. Yield: yield is the potential dollar earnings an investment can provide, and sometimes is described as the rate of return. It should become a consideration only after the basic requirements of safety and liquidity have been met. The City's investment philosophy is to insure the safety of principle and to provide money when needed. A high dollar yield on investments, though important, ranks third in the priority of investment strategy. Depository Services Money must be deposited in state or national banks, state or federal savings associations, or state or federal credit unions in the state. It may be in inactive deposits, active deposits or interest- bearing active deposits which are insured or collateralized as required by Government Code Section 53630 at seq. The deposits generally may not exceed the amount of the bank's shareholders' equity, the savings and loan's networth or the credit union's unimpaired capital and surplus. We require that each financial institution submit current financial statements which are evaluated prior to the investment of funds. We use the following criteria: The institution must have been in business at least three years. The institution must submit audited financial statements. In addition, examination is made of the Reserve for Loan Losses category to evaluate the financial trend of the institution's asset base. Whenever possible, the use of several year 2 F:\B95\FINANCE' \RES004.DOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • • financial data is evaluated to present a trend of activity in the institution. We also require the interest be paid to the City on a monthly basis (current state law only requires quarterly payment). Authorized Investments Generally, investments shall be made in the context of the "prudent person" rule, which states that, "investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." The City is further governed by the California Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq. Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein: Negotiable Certificates of Deposit. No more than 5% of the City's portfolio is invested in any one institution. Time Certificates of Deposits are safekept in a legally acceptable safekeeping account. Total purchases are not to exceed 30% of surplus funds. An institution must meet the following criteria to be considered by the City: 1. The institution must be located in California. 2. The institution must have current financial information, signed contract and waiver on file with the City. 3. The institution must maintain a net worth to asset ratio of a least 5%, and have a positive earnings record. 4. The institution must be at least 3 years old. U. S. TREASURIES are direct obligations of the United States Government. U.S. TREASURY BILLS are issued weekly with maturity dates up to one year. They are issued and traded on a discount basis and the interest is figured on the 360 day basis, actual number of days. They are issued in amounts of $10,000 and up, in multiples of $5,000. They are a highly liquid security. U.S. TREASURY NOTES are initially issued with two to ten years maturities. They are actively traded in a large secondary market and are very liquid. '3 F:1S95FINANCE1'RES004 OOC MEDIUM-TERM NOTES (MTNs) are corporate notes. Issuers include well recognized banks and bank holding companies, insurance companies, finance companies and industrial corporations. A large percentage of MTNs are unsecured senior debt obligations, although a number of recent issues have come to market on a collateralized or secured basis. Maturity bonds are from 9 months to one year, one year to 18 months, 18 months to 2 years, and annually thereafter. Typically, rates are established at a positive spread over a Treasury security of comparable maturity. Credit ratings on MTNs are established by nationally recognized rating services. Standard and Poor's, Moody's Investors Service and Fitch Investors Service. Credit supported MTNs typically carry the Aaa/AAA long term rating, based on the credit -worthiness of the support entity. Collateralized MTNs receive the same rating based on the over collateralization limits set by Standard and Poor's and Moodys. Although a rating of A is required for Municipal investment as per sections 53601 and/or 53635, this agency, as policy, will only consider investments with Aa/aa or better. There can be only 30% of the total surplus funds used for MTN investment as per section 53635. MTNs offer safety, yield and liquidity through a strong secondary market. BANKER'S ACCEPTANCES are negotiable time drafts drawn to finance the export, import, shipment or storage of goods, and they are termed "Accepted" when a bank guarantees to pay the face value at maturity. A Banker's Acceptance constitutes an irrevocable obligation of the accepting bank and a contingent obligation of the drawer and of any endorsees whose names appear upon it. The bank is protected by its customer's agreement to provide the necessary funds in advance of the maturity of the Acceptance and also by the pledge of documents such as bills of lading, independent warehouse of terminal receipts, and other documents evidencing ownership and the insurance of the goods so financed. Cities and other local agencies are authorized to purchase Banker's Acceptances, subject to several restrictions. First, the Banker's Acceptance must be eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System. Second, purchases of Banker's Acceptances must not exceed one hundred eighty (180) days maturity or 40% of the City's surplus money invested under Sections 53601 and/or 53635. Finally, no more than 5% of the agency's surplus funds may be invested in the Banker's Acceptances of any one commercial bank . 4 F0095\FINANCEIWE5004.DOC • • LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAT) is a pooled investment fund in the State Treasury which local agencies may use to deposit funds for investment. There is no minimum investment period and the minimum transaction is $5,000, in multiples of $1,000 above that, with a maximum of $40,000,000 for any agency. The City is restricted to a maximum of fifteen (15) transactions per month. It offers high liquidity because deposits can be converted to cash in twenty- four hours and no interest is lost. All interest is distributed to those agencies participating on a proportionate share determined by the amounts deposited and the length of time they are deposited. Interest is paid quarterly via direct deposit. The State keeps an amount for reasonable costs of making the investments, not to exceed one-quarter of one percent of the earnings. The interest rates are fairly high because of the pooling of the State surplus cash with the surplus cash deposited by local governments. This creates a multi -billion dollar money pool and allows diversified investments. In a high interest rate market, we do better than LAIF, but in times of low interest rates, LAIF yields are higher. The City continually invests in the Local Agency Investment Fund (Government Code Section 16429). LOS ANGELES COUNTY POOLED INVESTMENT FUND (LACPIF) Pursuant to Government Code Section 53684, local agencies in the County of Los Angeles may deposit excess funds in LACPIF for the purpose of investment by the county treasurer Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635; The County keeps an amount for reasonable costs of making the investments, not to exceed sixteen (16) basis points per month. The number of monthly transactions are not restricted. Safekeeping Certificates of Deposit or Receipts of Public Funds must be mailed or delivered to the City. Banker's acceptances are actual "physical" securities, meaning they are evidenced by actual certificates. All Treasury bills and most other Treasury securities are "book entry" securities, meaning they are held at the Federal Reserve Union Bank of California where only a book entry is used to denote ownership. Collateral for time deposits in banks and savings and loans are held by the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHB) or an approved Agency of Depository of the financial institution. Securities purchased from broker/dealers shall be held in third party safekeeping. 5 F 4395\FINANCEWESO04.DOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • • Public Trust All participants in the investment process shall act as custodians of the public trust. Investment officials shall recognize that the investment portfolio is subject to public review and evaluation. The overall program shall be designed and managed with a degree of professionalism that is worthy of the public trust. In a diversified portfolio it must be recognized that occasional measurement losses are inevitable, and must be considered within the context of the overall portfolio's investment return, provided that adequate diversification has been implemented. Risk Tolerance The City Council recognizes that investment risks can result from issuer defaults, market price changes or various technical complications leading to temporary illiquidity. Portfolio diversification is employed as a way to control risk. Investment Managers are expected to display prudence in the selection of securities, as a way to minimize default risk. No individual investment transaction shall be undertaken which jeopardizes the total capital position of the overall portfolio. The Treasurer shall periodically establish guidelines and strategies to control risks of default, market price changes, and illiquidity. Reporting The Treasurer or his deputy shall submit a monthly investment report to the City Council. This report will include all required elements of the monthly report as prescribed by Government Code Section 53646. Under the City's current Investment Policy, of the monthly report shall include: a. Type of investment b. Name of issuer c. Date of investment d. Date of maturity e. Amount of deposit or cost of the security f. Current market value g. Rate of Interest h A statement of compliance with California Code Section 53646, from the City 6 F:\B95WINANCEI'RESO04.DOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • • Treasurer certifying that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirement for the next six months; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach, as set forth in the recitals hereof, filed by the City Treasurer in compliance with Section 53646 (a) of the Government Code, is hereby approved. Section 2. That this policy applies to investments effective January 1, 2004. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF February 2004 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 7 FAB95\FINANCE1 RES004.DOC Acylesee PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2004 CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1315 VALLEY DRIVE 7:00 P.M. MINUTES The meeting was called to order at 7:15 P.M. 1. Roll Call Present: Commissioners, Applebaum, Beste, Cheatham, Lombardo, Winnek, Also Present: Richard Morgan, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Ray Abassi, Contract Traffic Engineer Michael Flaherty, Public Works Superintendent Rhea Punneo, Administrative Assistant, Public Works Department Absent: None 2. Flaq Salute Commissioner Lombardo led the flag salute. 3. Approval of Minutes: November 19, 2003 Minutes were approved as written. 4. Public Comments None 5. Correspondence Letter from Mr. Walter Guido (not present) was presented by Mr. Morgan. Mr. Guido's letter cited the following problems: 1. Access up and down 3rd Street and 2. Sight distance to turn out onto Ardmore creating a hazard. Mr. Flaherty measured the red curb In the area and presented the information to the Commission. Mr. Morgan asked that the Commissioners consider how to achieve a solution weighing safety versus parking. Mr. Morgan also suggested a possible solution would be to extend the red curbs much as possible. Discussion among the Commissioners included the following: • Suggestion to put this item on the Agenda for further consideration if staff deems it necessary. • Research with Fire Chief and Police Department for any accidents at this location. • Could possibly shorten the parking spaces, but not lose parking. • This is an ongoing problem with no solution at this time, investigate and bring back to Commission. 6. Items for Commission Consideration Item 6b was heard first but Items 6a and 6b are presented in order for clarity. 2f • • a. Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) left turns at Aviation Boulevard Mr. Morgan presented a summary of the problem brought to the attention of Public Works via email by Mr. Richard McCurdy dated January 8, 2004. The left turn pocket from PCH to eastbound Aviation Boulevard capacity is exceeded. This leads to congestion during peak traffic periods. Mr. Morgan then tumed the floor over to Mr. Abassi for further explanation. Mr. Abassi demonstrated the current situation and the four options presented. Mr. Abassi presented Option 4 as the best solution to the problem, which would provide a double left tum pocket. Mr. Morgan advised the Commission that Caltrans is interested in the Option 4 realignment, which would address additional public safety concems of northbound PCH right tums onto Aviation Boulevard. It would consist of taking some the land from the park at that intersection. Discussion among the commissioners included the following: • Concern was voiced regarding room for creating a second left tum lane with only minor modifications. • Resolving this problem with additional signage in the area. This will be addressed further with Caltrans. • There was an inquiry as to the existence of a study of tums into McDonald's and 11t Street. No study, but 70 — 80% of the turns are unplanned and not expected to increase. • If an additional left tum lane added, should include extending time of left tum light — may not be feasible. • Resolving with non-standard solutions — this was advised against. But will be addressed with Caltrans. • Short-term resolution of signage prohibiting left tum and extending left tum light would not alleviate the problem. • Caltrans funding of this project Mr. Richard McCurdy. 1004 9'^ Street • Congestion at this location last Wednesday at 1:45pm was extreme for that time of day and prompted his email to Mr. Morgan. • Stated that the left tum lane as depicted on the map is out of proportion, but is actually less than half the total distance. • Traffic flow is always heavy. • When traveling in the far left lane and signal, assumption is that you are tuming into Ralphs and people then proceed to pull out in front of you. Mrs. Cathy McCurdy, 1004 9"' Street • Need to address long-term major issue of people not knowing who actually has the right-of- way. • Would like to see realignment move ahead as the short-term solution. Additional discussion among the Commissioners included the following: • Estimate of time needed for completion of changes to right tum lanes on Pier/PCH. • Left tum lanes continue to be a problem. • The Artesia/PCH redesign has worked out well. Need to focus on short -tem, solution by working with Caltrans. • Long-term solution could become part of Caltrans' 5 -year plan. PWC Minutes 2 1/21/04 1 1 • • • May need to put before the voters with regard to the 10 -foot dedication of City -owned park property. • No Department of Transportation funds are available. MOTION by Commissioner Cheatham to study Option 4 with a recommendation to Council and an approval for staff to study further and explore a short-term solution while the larger study goes on. Question on Motion by Commissioner Winnek to clarify motion — Is Staff to continue to study the issue and bring it back to Commission? Motion clarified: Make Caltrans aware that there is an interest in designating property for the purpose of widening the left turn pockets and at the same time, have staff bring further studies back to Commission. Seconded by Commissioner Winnek as amended. AYES: Applebaum, Beste, Cheatham, Lombardo, Winnek NAYS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None b. Speed Humps for 24th Place between Park Ave. and Valley Dr. Mr. Morgan presented the item, noting that this request has met the criteria for requesting a speed hump. He noted that 24th Place is a sloped street with a 16% slope at the west end, a 2-3% slope in the middle and a 6% slope at the east end. Currently, two locations have been designated for speed humps, as shown on the topographical drawing. It is proposed that advance signage be placed at the top of the hill as opposed to the customary 50 feet. Staff does recommend this action, but there is a budgeting issue which may take some time to achieve. Discussion of the item included the following: • Inquiry as to whether a speed survey has been done. • Talk to all residents who are directly affected by the placement of the speed humps. • Review policy wording and its interpretation on placement. Need 100%'acceptance of the properties (immediately adjacent to) affected by speed humps. • Changing location of speed humps to avoid those who are opposed. • It was noted that the resident whose letter is Supplement 6b (513) is located in the general vicinity and not immediately adjacent to speed hump. • Additional signage placement could be beneficial. Mary Garrett. 551 24th Place Ms. Garrett is a 24 -year resident. Previous addresses were 516 and 547. Did not sign petition. Concerned about the affect on emergency vehicles. Will speed humps cause cars traveling too fast to lose control? Streets need repairs. Will speed humps attract bicyclers and skateboarders? Maybe additional signage needed (Caution Children at Play). Is aware that Daniels at 511 is opposed. This may increase traffic on the two adjacent streets. Comments by Mr. Morgan included: Speed humps versus bumps. Speed humps do not pose a hazard to driver, only discomfort. Humps are 15 feet wide and 2 5/8" high. Cars will not lose control. Commissioner Lombardo: Police and Fire Departments will need to sign off on (this request before it is implemented. It was then decided that the Commission would hold its remarks until the end. PWC Minutes 3 1/21/04 • • Gabby Rosenfeld, Julianne Rosenfeld and Ellen Rosenfeld, 541 24th Place Young children: In favor of. Want drivers to slow down. Afraid when drivers go fast. Have seen two dogs hit by fast drivers. Ed Beeles, 553 24th Place Is a 35 -year resident. Has previously tried to have street closed down. He is opposed to the hump. Doesn't believe it would reduce traffic. Would create a hazard for bicyclers and skateboarders. Requests that streets are repaired first. Who will pay for humps? Better to increase law enforcement. Andy Clifton, 525 24th Place. Also owns 512 24th Place and Manages 521 24th Place In favor of speed humps. Resides in the middle where most speeding occurs — 35 — 40 mph. Does not believe it will pose a danger for bicyclers or skateboarders. Believes 24th Place is traveled because there is a stop sign on 24"' Street and 25th Street is curvy. Dan Saks. 547 24th Place In favor of speed humps, believes they will help. Inquired about markings on speed humps. Will they be full or partial width? With parking on both sides of street, 25mph is too fast. Sarah Pettitt, 546 24th Place In favor of hump. Has seen dogs killed. There are many children outside on bikes, etc. Have stood in front of police placed speed clocks and have seen speeds as high as 50mph. Larry Peha, 520 24th Place Is a 2 -year resident. In favor of and circulated petition for humps along with Audrey Little. Has yelled at people to slow down. Again reiterated that 88% are in favor. One hump is located in front of his property and believes the locations are good. Kelly Kendall. 511 24"' Place Asked about signage look and location. Jeff Newman, 554 24th Place Wanted to point out to those who are against citing a danger to children — people with children have signed this petition. Leanne Clifton, 525 20 Place Is a 30 -year resident. In favor of. She is located in the middle of the block where most speeding occurs. Has a friend who lives on 9"' Street and is happy with the results of their speed humps. Believes the stop sign on 24th Street has increased the traffic. Tried to get solution before — but only speed bumps, not humps available. PWC Minutes 4 1/21/04 Discussion among the Commissioners included the following: • Concemed about the high rate of speeds cited on this street by its residents, requested this item goes back to staff for a speed survey and that police increase its presence in this area. • Concem that street need repaving first, then place speed humps at that time. • Staff should collect data for 521 21" Place (Manager of property — Leanne Clifton, 525 24"' Place — does not believe that residents are opposed, but will speak to them.) • Due to the steepness of this street, there is concem that the speed humps may cause flooding. • Sandbagging may be required during heavy rains. This will be monitored in the proper phase. • Policy to do speed surveys, such as on 9th and 18th Streets. Even though there were isolated speeders. No hazard to 50mph driving. • Petition appears to have met criteria and should move ahead, along with repair of street. • Hazard concern if drivers can go around speed humps. MOTION by Commissioner Lombardo to move ahead with this project, pending approval by Police and Fire Departments and verification of petitions. Seconded by Commissioner Applebaum. AYES: Applebaum, Beste, Cheatham, Lombardo NAYS: Winnek ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 7. Commissioners' Reports None 8. Council Minutes —11/12/03.11/26/03,12/9/03; Council Agenda —1/13/04 Receive and file all. No comments on a. or b. 9. Items Requested by Commissioners None at this time. 10.Other Matters Commissioner Winnek raised an issue from his Motion on page 3 of the November 19, 2003 minutes regarding sending a letter to Caltrans with the City's request for the safest situation for pedestrians. A discussion followed and it was ultimately decided that it was not a good idea to send the letter to Caltrans since they are cooperating and the City of Hermosa Beach is handling this matter responsibly. 11. Public Comments Commissioner Lombardo reminded everyone of the Hazardous Waste Round Up on Saturday, January 24, 2004 at Valley Dr. and 116' Street. In addition, Mr. Flaherty advised that Hyperion Waste Station, 7660 W. Imperial Hwy, Gate E will allow residents t'o dispose of hazardous waste, Including e -waste, every Saturday and Sunday, from 9:00 am — 3:00 pm and had requested that a flyer be sent out to Hermosa Beach residents. Commissioner Cheatham thanked Public Works for last Sunday's clean up of the new room in the Historical Museum, especially Mr. Flaherty. PWC Minutes 5 1/21/04 • 12. Adjournment • Chairman Lombardo adjoumed the meeting at 8:58 p.m. to the meeting of February 18, 2004. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Public Works Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of January 21, 2004. Jean Lombardo, Chairman Richard D. Morgan, P.E., Secretary Date PWC Minutes 6 1/21/04 S Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council fl-& dAy CITY HALL HANDRAIL PROJECT — REJECT BID Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Reject the only bid received for the City Hall Handrail Project No. 007-04; and 2. Authorize Staff to re -advertise for bids; Summary: February 3, 2004 Regular Meeting of February 10, 2004 On October 28, 2003, staff received Council authorization to solicit bids for the replacement of all exterior handrails at the City Hall, Police Department, and Library buildings. Plans and specifications were prepared and requests for bid notices were sent to five qualified contractors in addition to being advertised in the "Easy Reader; the "FW Dodge Greensheet" and on the City's website. On Wednesday, January 7, 2004, a mandatory pre-bid meeting, including a site inspection, was held, which five prospective bidders attended. On Thursday, January 22, 2004, the City Clerk received the following bid. The bid was publicly opened and read aloud. The bid result was as follows: Firm Name City Bid Amount Cranveyor Corporation South El Monte $29,840.00 Because we only received one bid, staff recommends that the Council reject the bid and re -bid the project. The plans and specifications called for the installation of a "sole source" aluminum handrail as provided by Craneveyor Corporation. The bidders were to fumish this product and competitively bid the installation work. Because of the previous dissatisfaction with the existing handrail, staff was hesitant to allow an "approved equal" substitution. The Craneveyor handrail is the one used by the County on all of their beaches and it has demonstrated its long-term durability in a marine environment. Staff received complaints from other potential bidders stating that this gave Craneveyor an unfair advantage. Staff now recommends that this project be re -bid using the Craneveyor specifications but allowing the substitution of an 'approved equal" with the requirement that. the alternate manufacturer provide an example of their railing which has existed in a marine environment for over 20 years. Fiscal Impact: None at this time. Respectfully submitted, Frank J. Senteno Assistant Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur. Richard organ, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Step City Manager 2g H:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\007.04 Reject all bids 02-10-04.doc • • (14' January 29, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council Febuary10, 2004 REQUEST TO PURCHASE HANDGUNS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council: 1. Authorize the purchase of forty-eight (48) STI .45 caliber handguns from Shooters Connection Incorporated of Middletown, Kentucky in the amount of $67,638 (includes tax and shipping). 2. Appropriate $17,638 from the Citizens Option for Public Safety (COPS) fund. (The balance of the purchase has been appropriated for this fiscal year). BACKGROUND The Hermosa Beach Police Department purchased the handguns now in use as the department's primary duty weapon in 1983. At that time the Series Eighty, Colt Government model weapon system was the state of the art. The department chose to purchase weapons constructed of stainless steel in an effort to avoid the corrosion inherent in a marine environment. The stainless steel weapons served the department well for over twenty years. Unfortunately, many of the stainless steel components that absorb shock during the normal operation of the weapon have become brittle and are prone to failure. The weapons are failing (due to metal fatigue) during use at the shooting range at an alarming rate. ANALYSIS The current department handguns cannot be repaired and must be replaced. Several months ago the police department formed a committee to consider the type and caliber of weapon that should be purchased. After several meetings the committee recommended remaining with a Colt Government model weapon system in .45 caliber. Several legitimate firearms manufacturers produce a Colt Government "Type" weapon system. After careful consideration of the weapons produced by the major firearms manufactures the committee recommended purchasing the STI .45 caliber pistol. The STI .45 caliber handgun incorporates several features that make it superior to other weapon systems in the Colt Government "Type" category. This weapon has a high capacity, (14 -round) magazine that is tapered to facilitate re -loading. The weapon comes with a fixed "night -site" and each pistol is assembled by hand ensuring smoother operation for better shot placement. 2h • • The department advertised a request for proposal (RFP) for forty-eight (48) pistols with bids due on January 22 2004. A total of four bids were received. Staff evaluated the bids and determined that Shooters Connection Incorporated of Middletown, Kentucky submitted the lowest bid. Once the new pistols are issued to the officers, the current pistols will be destroyed. FISCAL IMPACT An amount of $17,638 is to be appropriated from the Citizens Option for Public Safety (C.O.P.S.) fund. The remainder of the funds ($50,000) has been approved in the current fiscal year budget. Respectfully Submitted, Michael L Hermosa Concur hief of Police Stephen Burrell Police Department City Manager Fiscal Impact: ezicegioratti Viki Copeland Finance Director • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH — BID OPENING LOG SHEET Project Name: ✓ ' IC �a�FFQ- — pi) Date: C� z- o(1-- Page 1 of 1 Bidder's Name 1) �-sof`^ �(L" ' �. 2) Si� u�. a/6/6 3) , Sao. 094. -eau.`- -i VL�ca 5) Amount of Bid S io 6) JJ Attest: W ice of the City Clerk - 131r 5 Va ey Drive - Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 • .• Shooters Connection, Inc. P.O. Box 9 2737 North Middletown Rd North Midd&etown, KY 40357 1-800-387-4045 Orders 1-859-362-4152 Information & Administration 1-859-362-7599 Fax Email chuckbCa�shootersconnection.com Web www.shootersconnection.com January 14, 2004 City of Hermosa Beach, CA- Police Department, Formal bid for the following: 44- STI G5.0 Eagle 45 pistols blue finish, equipped with fixed tritium night sites and 3 high capacity magazines. 1295.00 each i el fes/ (J r -i JAN 2 2 2004 krmh IU LLJ t; rs;147 MY COI. :' V HENZAC7A 3EAC:i 4- STI G3.9 VIP 45 pistols blue finish, equipped with fixed tritium night sites and 3 high capacity magazines. 1295.00 each = /D Pricing is not including Federal Excise Tax. ATF rules apply for exemption. Police Departments are exempt from the tax but ATF has guidelines which must be complied with. Up to 3 magazines per gun will be tuned by the factory for each gun at no charge. Shipping Expense-$ 350.00 Sin rely, Chuck Bradley President 4 • /1,64,74,ie, _2V7 -63aS February 4, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 10, 2004 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04- APPROVING A PRE-TAX PAYROLL DEDUCTION PLAN FOR SERVICE CREDIT PURCHASES Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 04- , approving a pre-tax payroll deduction plan for service credit purchases. Background: Employees covered by the California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS) earn service credit which is one of the elements used in calculating retirement benefits. The Police Association is requesting that employees be allowed to make pre-tax deductions for service credit purchases through CaIPERS. (Service Credit may be purchased for a variety of situations, i.e., purchasing military service prior to employment.) Employees who elect the pre-tax option gain the benefit of deferring income tax liability on their service credit purchases. Analysis: In order to provide the pre-tax deduction option for employees, the City must file with CaIPERS a completed copy of the attached Resolution which allows all Miscellaneous and Safety employees to use this option. The wording of the Resolution is provided by PERS and may not be changed. The effective date for commencement of the Plan cannot be any earlier than the date the completed resolution is received and approved by CaIPERS. Once the Plan is adopted, it is irrevocable. There is no fiscal impact to the City since these service credit purchases are paid for by the employee. Respectfully submitted, Viki Copeland Finance Director NOTED: Step R. = re I City Manager 21 J J RESOLUTION NO. 04 - EMPLOYER PICKUP RESOLUTION PRE-TAX PAYROLL DEDUCTION PLAN FOR SERVICE CREDIT PURCHASES (CONTRIBUTION CODE 14) WHEREAS, The Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (Ca1PERS) at the April 1996 meeting approved a pre-tax payroll deduction plan for service credit purchases under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 414(h)(2); and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach has the authority to implement the provisions of IRC section 414(h)(2) and has determined that even though implementation is not required by law, the tax benefit offered by this section should be provided to those employees who are members of CaIPERS; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach elects to participate in the pre-tax payroll deduction plan for all employees in the following CaIPERS coverage group(s): All Miscellaneous and All Safety Coverage Groups NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the City of Hermosa Beach will implement the provisions of IRC section 414(h)(2) by making employee contributions for service credit purchases pursuant to the California State Government Code on behalf of its employees who are members of Ca1PERS and who have made a binding irrevocable election to participate in the pre- tax payroll deduction plan. "Employee contributions" shall mean those contributions reported to Ca1PERS which are deducted from the salary of employees and are credited to individual employee accounts for service credit purchases, thereby resulting in tax deferral of employee contributions. 2. That the contributions made by the City of Hermosa Beach to CaIPERS, although designated as employee contributions, are being paid by the City of Hermosa Beach in lieu of contributions by the employees who are members of CaIPERS. • • 3. That the employees shall not have the option of choosing to receive the contributed amounts directly instead of having them paid by the City of Hermosa Beach to Ca1PERS. 4. That the City of Hermosa Beach shall pay to Ca1PERS the contributions designated as employee contributions from the same source of funds as used in paying salary, thereby resulting in tax deferral of employee contributions. 5. That the effective date for commencement of the pre-tax payroll deduction plan cannot be any earlier than July 1, 1996, or the date the completed resolution is received and approved in CaIPERS, whichever is later. 6. That the governing body of the City of Hermosa Beach shall participate in and adhere to requirements and restrictions of the pre-tax payroll deduction plan by reporting pre- tax payroll deductions when authorized by CaIPERS for those employees of the above stated Coverage Group(s) who have elected to participate in this plan. PASSED and ADOPTED by the governing body of the City of Hermosa Beach this 10`h day of February, 2004. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney • HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL nr /e.t& 7/-6.sg.) 6 ,7•VidAy February 3, 2004 Regular Meeting of February 10, 2004 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP NO. 26262 (C.U.P. CON NO. 02-2, PDP NO. 02-4) LOCATION: 300 HERMOSA AVENUE APPLICANT(S): SUSAN SWERDLOFF REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map No. 26262 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a three unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 26262 at their August 20, 2002 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. 2j • Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Sol Blumenfel Community D Dir ctor elopment Department Stephe 61114 City anager Respectfully submitted, ----Ken' obertson Senior Planner y/f:fm300hermosa 1 2 3 4 RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 26262 FOR A THREE UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 300 HERMOSA AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on February 10, 2004 and made the following Findings: 6 A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; a B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is 9 consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Govemment Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 02-30 adopted after hearing on August 20, 2002; E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map No.26262 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California,.being a Subdivision of Lot 7, Block 39, First Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract, as recorded in Book 1, Page(s) 59 and 60 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a three -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 300 Hermosa Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 10th day of February, 2004. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 3 f:fn1300hermosars • February 4, 2004 Regular Meeting of February 10, 2004 Mayor and Members of the City Council REPORT OF CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEYS/COMPLAINTS Recommendation: To receive and file the report. The department names listed in this summary have been abbreviated (CD = Community Development; FC = Finance Cashier; PW = Public Works). This summary report includes surveys received by the City Clerk during the month of January 2004 (these surveys had been submitted to the City in December, and were date-stamped accordingly, but were not submitted to the Clerk's office until January). No letters were received during the month of January. The following summarizes the two surveys received: Dept(s) Date Rec'd Service Additional comments CD 12-30-03 Excellent Other cities should be as efficient and easy to deal with but thought overcautious plan checkers often caused financial and time constraint problems CD/FC/PW 12-29-03 Excellent Commended staff as friendly, helpful, and efficient; thought plan check approval was a little slow, but the rest of the process was excellent The report summarizing submittals during the month of February will be presented to the City Council at the March 9, 2004 meeting. Noted: C' fw4Stephen Bug of, rtager Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk KJ 2k 11/ •i0� ; joy February 4, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council February 10, 2004 RECOMMENDATION TO DENY CLAIM Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council deny the following claim and refer it to the City's Liability Claims Administrator 1. Claimant: Roberts, Cecil; Roberts, Grace; Roberts, Cecil Jr.; Hur, Marvin; Hur, Connie Date of Loss: 09-20-03 Date Filed: 01-22-04 Allegation: Police Harassment A copy of this claim is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, Concur: Mic ael A. Earl, Director Pe sonnet & Risk Management IUNAUA 4k6LE FDIZ. SiGt4A-rui.IC Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 21 February 5, 2004 • Cityncil Meeting of February 10, 2004 1 Approval of Personnel Complaint Form 1 Recommendation Review and approve personnel complaint form. Background At the City Council meeting of January 27, 2004 the City Council approved a personnel complaint procedure and requested that the final form be provided for approval. Attached is a draft of the final form based on the direction of the City Council. Analysis Using the original form provided to staff and the procedures approved by the City Council at their meeting of January 27, 2004, the attached form has been developed. The form incorporates the basic information requested by the complainant and outlines the complaint procedure. It is noted in the procedure that complaints may also be made by letter. Following approval, staff will implement the program and form immediately. Monthly reports on formal complaints received will be provided along with the reports on the Customer Service Survey forms. Respectfully submitted: Mic ael Ear Pe sonnei Director Concur: Stephen Burrell City Manager 2m h • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • PERSONNEL COMPLAINT FORM This form provides a method for the public to have formal complaints addressed regarding services they received by City of Hermosa Beach staff. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS FORM Please complete this form and submit it to the City Clerk's Office. The City Clerk's Office will date stamp your complaint and provide you with a copy. Your complaint may also be submitted in a letter format. Once received, your complaint will be forwarded to the Personnel Director for review and investigation. A written response will be provided to you within ten (10) days of receipt of your complaint. The City will provide you with information regarding any corrective action taken or changes in policies or procedures that are specific to your complaint. However, Information regarding personnel matters of City employees must be kept confidential. Complaints specifically regarding the City Manager or City Attorney will be forwarded directly to the City Council by the City Clerk's Office. The City Council may then schedule a closed session meeting to address those complaints. Your Name Your Address Email Address Telephone Number Signature Employee(s) Name(s) Department Explanation of the Complaint: The Complaint has been received and a copy provided to the Complainant. Date City Clerk Signature Z abed W7 LE: OT •6q�Z u /OT/Z zabeeW 'CaTO EH OZ WOHd • February 9, 2004 The Honorable Mayor Michael Keegan The Honorable Councilman Art Yoon The Honorable Councilman Sam Edgerton City of Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: 100 The Strand Gentlemen: I am writing you as a property owner affected by the above -referenced site, and hope that my input will be of some interest to you. I grew up on the Strand in the 1950's and some of my earliest childhood memories are of a rather eccentric and bohemian Hermosa Beach. The house at 100 The Strand is certainly one of those memories and I have no opposition to it as an historical site should that be the City's decision. The home, however, is not truly representative of the wonderful and innovative architecture of our early 20th century, as evidenced by some of the splendid Arts and Crafts or Wright homes of Southern California. As a volunteer with the California Architectural Conservancy, I have bad the pleasure of working on the restoration of the Ellis -Brown house (F.L. Wright) in Los Angeles and am an ardent supporter of our architectural treasures. In my opinion, 100 The Strand has been architecturally modeled, and rather crudely at that, on seaside homes of French Normandy or Brittany, and such represents someone's rather pretentious folly. I now reside at 128 Hermosa Avenue, which is situated directly center of the In Street walk way. No 100 The Strand is part of my view of the coast, and I have watched the property deteriorate year by year over the past decade to the present deplorable condition of its building and landscaping. With the extensive overgrowth of trees and shrubbery surrounding the site, my present view has been obscured by approximately 25%. I resvectfully request that this condition be addressed by the City and that my view be restored. The overgrowth and shoddy maintenance of the site landscaping was never the intent of the original builder, and should be considered as an issue separate from the historical integrity of the site. Respectfully yours, "�( /,, '%� Candace Gates l UG ;� ig/C0---/ /L%%«' 128 Hermosa Avenue 7 / IRON suPPLEME T .L 5 a 1NFOF MATI0N i4lt0 li tOOZ •01193 02/09/2004 11:19 1304749 RALEIGH STUD• PAGE 02 RALEIOHSTUDIOS HOLLYWOOD I MANNLTTAN etICN Mayor Michael Keegan Mayor Pro Tem Art Yoon Councilman Sam Edgerton City of Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 February 5, 2004 Re: 100 The Strand MICHAEL M. MOUE P*IIID(NT Dear Sirs, I speak for several property owners that are affected by the re -development quagmire surrounding 100 The Strand. We have our own opinions on the matter, which are in line with Councilman Edgerton's. However, we have one request of Council that we implore their consideration and approval of. The walk street and alley lines of the property arc covered with hedges and trees, which create a screen, and block several of the neighbor's views. I have been working with City Planning for many months on this issue. Although they have been trying to help, the change over in ownership has made it a difficult issue to wrangle. We feel we have been very patient, have worked with the city and have taken the right steps. Just when we thought a resolve was in sight, we now find ourselves back to square one. The development of this property affects the immediate property owners and our property values more than anyone. While we feel that a re -development of the property would be a positive thing for the adjacent homeowner's values, it is the tree and hedge screen that troubles us by significantly reducing our views as well as the corresponding property value. We ask that despite the outcome of this development debate that the council allow the screen to be trimmed without further delay so as not to obstruct the neighbors views. If the property owner is unwilling to pay for the trimming, we will do so. The resolve of this debate sits between the property owner and the City. Please release the neighbors from the collateral damage by letting the screening be dealt with, so we can enjoy our views, which have been diminishing month by month. Michael Moore 5300 Melrose know. Hollywood, CHNornia 90036 T6 323.466.3111 FAX 323.71.5800 1800 Romagna Avenue. Menhenan Beach. Calilumia 90256 Tn 310.727.2700 VAX 310.727.2710 www.Meleso aw,0ee.wr W FROM 13239604749 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5a TO HB City Manager 2/9/2004 10:19 AM Page 2 • Page l of l Subject: FW: Concern for "Lighthouse" house Original Message From: Chuck Thomka [mailto:chuckthom_99@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 1:08 PM To: City Clerk Subject: Concem for "Lighthouse" house I was asked by a person (a lady by name of "Dolly"), while walking the Strand, to voice my opinion of the "Lighthouse" house scheduled for demolition. I think the lost of the house would be a lost of character of the neighborhood. While I would prefer that the house remain, and restored, I also feel terrible for the new owner to lose on his speculative investment. IF, that is IF (!), he was truly blindsided in a now new determinition of the historical status of his house. However, I have now heard conflicting stories about whether or not he related what his intentions on the house were before he purchased it (was he going to renovate, or demolate?). If he truly let his intentions known that he was going to demolish the house before he actually purchased it, then it is unfair that the house now be consided being classified as a landmark. If he let people believe that he was going to save and renovate the house before the purchase, when he really wanted to demolish and rebuild on the empty lot, then TOO BAD for him. I feel that was dishonest, and I don;t mind that the house gets classified as a landmark now. Just my opinion, Chuck Thomka in south Redondo Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online SUPPLEMENTAL 5a INFORMATION 2/9/2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council v February 3, 2004 Regular Meeting of February 10, 2004 SUBJECT: HISTORIC RESOURCE NOMINATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 100 THE STRAND AND AUTHORIZATION TO STUDY PROPERTY FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION. Recommendation: That the City Council direct staff as deemed appropriate. If the City Council determines that it wants to pursue a landmark designation it should: 1. Adopt the attached resolution nominating the subject property for designation as a historic resource pursuant to Chapter 17.53 of the Zone Code; and 2. Authorize staff to obtain proposals from qualified consultants to prepare an architectural survey of the subject property to determine whether it qualifies for historic designation pursuant to the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance; and 3. Direct staff to return with a report within 45 days of execution of the survey contract for report on historic designation of the property to City Council. Background: On January 27, 2004, the City Council recommended nominating the subject property as a candidate for historic preservation under Chapter 17.53 of the Zone Code and to return with a resolution at the next City Council meeting implementing the decision. Analysis: The City's Historic Preservation Ordinance provides that a property may be designated a historic landmark if it qualifies as: A. A resource exemplifying special cultural, social economic political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history B. A resource identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history. C. A resource embodying distinctive characteristics of style, type, period, or method of construction or a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship D. A resource representative of notable work of a builder, designer or architect E. A resource with unique location, singular physical characteristics, representing an established and familiar visual feature or landmark of a neighborhood, community or the City: The Ordinance allows for nomination by either the property owner or the City. The City Council has the discretion whether or not to make the nomination. In order for the Council to proceed with the process, should it choose to do so, the property must be surveyed. Staff obtained a proposal from a qualified historic preservation consultant to provide a cost estimate for the survey and scope of work (Attachment No. 1). The minimum eligibility requirements for consideration of a landmark is that it must be: "At least 50 years old, with the exception that an historic resource of at least 30 years old may be eligible if the Council determines that the resource is exceptional or that it is threatened by demolition, igemoval, relocation, or inappropriate alteration." a Staff has notified the affected property owner of the potential historic landmark nomination pursuant to the requirements of the Ordinance. In addition to the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, the City adopted the Secretary of the Interior's Standards to provide uniform guidance on building restoration and improvements which recommends obtaining a historic preservation professional as part of the planning and approval process for historic landmarks. All landmarks must be restored pursuant to these Standards. The subject property is not recognized in the City's list of Locally Significant Resources in the Land Use Element of the General Plan (approved in 1994, Attachment No. 2). This list was compiled from the publication Castles on the Sand prior to adoption of the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance (approved in 1998) and has not been evaluated for consistency with the Ordinance.2 Sol Blumenfeld, 1 ire or Community De - lopment Department Concur: Stephurrel City Manager Attachments: 1. General Plan Land Use Element List of Historically Significant Structures. 2. General Plan Land Use Element — Historic Preservation. 3. Chapter 17.53 Zone Code —Historic Resources Preservation. 4. Resolution 5. Correspondence & Photos 6. Contract/Scope of Work. Notes 1. The Bijou Building has been restored pursuant to the Secretary of the Interiors Standards utilizing the assistance of a qualified architectural historian who reviewed all plan submittals and approved plans and conducted field inspection after an extensive historic survey and report on the historical character defining features of the property. 2. According to the City's General Plan "the Potential Candidates for Historic Resource Designation are based on discussions with representatives from the Hermosa Beach Historical Society and other interested individuals". It is "a preliminary list of properties that could be considered locally significant and potential candidates for future historic designation." PJ100TheStrant 1. • • List of Locally Significant Resources 1 Bank of America building, 90 Pier Avenue - commercial structures in downtown 2 Hermosa Hotel, 26 Pier Avenue - the oldest downtown, built before World War I 3, Bijou Theater, 1229 Hermosa Avenue - the oldest movie theater in city 4. commercial building at northeast corner of Pier and Hermosa Avenues, 1200 Hermosa Avenue - only early 20th Century brick architecture in downtown one of the oldest hotel building in Insomniac site, 49-53 Pier Avenue (now Loreto Plaza) - former site of Insomniac coffeehouse, famous poetry and jazz theater in 1950s and 1960s 6 The Lighthouse, 30 Pier Avenue 1940s 7. Del Mar Apartments, 840 Strand apartment building 8. Berth Hotel, 1042 Strand - built in 1907 and commended by the City for its beautification in 1978; now part of the Sea Sprite Motel complex famous jazz nightclub since - early 20th Century downtown 9. Sea Sprite Motel, 1016 Strand - oldest of the modern -era motor lodge in City, in continuous operation since the 1940s 10. Grannis Hotel and Apartments, 24 llth Street - built in 1911, also known as the St. Francis Hotel in the 1950s 11. Pueblo Apartments, 1912 Hermosa Avenue - architecturally distinctive adobe style dating back to 1924 12. Matteson home, 1040 Manhattan Avenue - distinctive frame architecture with gabled roof 13. Pitcher House, 142 Pacific Coast Highway - distinctive early 20th Century style brick architecture 14. old Mrs. Gooch's building, 526 Pier Avenue - early American style wood frame building, formerly the Hermosa Tabernacle Church in the 1920s 15. GTE building, 102 Pacific Coast Highway - architecture commercial building 16. Clark Stadium building, 861 Valley Drive building over 5Q years old - 135 - classic deco brick - small deco style 3 17. Community Center, nter, 710 Pier Avenue - c• sic deco building formerly used as an elementary school 18. Charlie Chaplin house, 32 10th Street - summer home for Charlie Chaplin family, featuring distinctive front porch arches 19. house, 1602 Strand - Spanish -style castle structure with art glass windows built in 1928 20. Neutra Apartments, 1608-1612 Strand - built in 1938, believed to be an early example of famous architect Richard Neutra 21. T. L. Woolwine house, 2601 Strand - Pre -World War I building, former home of Los Angeles District Attorney during early 1900s 22. Ozzie and Harriet Nelson home, 3133 Strand - summer home to famous entertainment family with an attractive wood shingle facade 23. Sprague house, 3301 Strand - home to members of the Sprague family, who were part of Nixon's "Kitchen Cabinet," distinguished by pink stucco facade and garden style layout 24. McComb house, 3409 Strand - former home of State Supreme Court Justice McComb 25. Sarah A. Beane house, 2330 Strand - quaint early bungalow house that is one of the oldest residential structures in South Bay, dated back to 1880s. Formerly the real estate office of Sarah A. Beane, the City's first postmaster 26. William W. Mathews house, 37 9th Street - large two story early California bungalow house built in 1907, formerly the home of William W. Mathews, Hermosa Beach Mayor and councilman during World War II 27. William Jennings Bryan home, 2045 Monterey Boulevard - classic California bungalow, home to the famous politician and orator during.his retirement years 28. Matteson home, 1901 Manhattan Avenue - beautiful mansion built in 1921 by noted architect Paul Williams, one of the few South Bay examples of his work Possible Historic Districts - residential neighborhood bounded by 16th Street, Strand, 20th Street, and Hermosa Avenue - Strand houses north of 26th Street - 136 - 4L Map I7 LOCALLY .SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC RESOURCES Location Map Lir POTENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR HISTORIC RESOURCE DESIGNATION Based on discussions with representatives from the Hermosa Beach Historical Society and other interested individuals, staff has prepared a preliminary list of properties and sites that could be considered locally significant and potential candidates for future historic designation (see Map 17). This list was compiled from information provided by members of the Hermosa Beach Historical Society and the publication Castles On The Sand (1977) by Patricia Gazin. The following is not meant to be a final or exhaustive representation of all community resources. TB M 11.411 _J QS1111 2 23 s: IP a_ sou , a gal rat ma ton CI 9i3 .123 CFI PJ� ®A 0S-' 1 MIN CMCD mommailim III 21 paSTIIMI 2019 fti i gift tam Al 0 1331 o llama Mrs EDI a 0 Sat 9301 • • • Mir N® • M m ORME CD "Al ••A, II IN ars Sal Milan 1 i Act HMS Mar ' mol a.3 ir HISTORIC PRESERVATION FRoti LAOD USE FLEHrarr Historic preservation can be a valuable planning tool for identifying and protecting significant community resources. Knowledge of a community's past helps in understanding emerging patterns and future expectations. In fully developed communities such as Hermosa Beach, preservation planning may be the most realistic approach to reviving or maintaining the viability of the city. A greater knowledge of local cultural resources provides a stronger base for better planning and more informed decision-making. The preservation of historic and cultural resources can have many social and economic benefits. Familiar structures and landmarks help establish a sense of permanence and community pride among local residents and property owners. These resources provide both Educational and aesthetic contributions to the local character. The economic benefits of historic preservation include the potential for increased property values, greater retail sales volumes, enhanced commercial rents, and greater tax revenues. Policy 12 of the City's Urban Design Element to the General Plan states that the City should "encourage private preservation of buildings which have historic and/or architectural merit." The specific Urban Design Element programs directly related to this City Policy are as follows: Program 5: Develop incentives for the retention and rehabilitation of houses with architectural or historic merit in all zones. Program 6: Allow nonconforming uses for buildings of architectural or historic merit for the life of the building. Program 7: Encourage and assist owners of buildings of architectural or historic merit in applying for tax relief under State programs which began in.1977. Program 8: Develop a alternative building code for historic houses. Program 9: Encourage the rehabilitation of historic buildings by providing for the preservation of the building facade when it is not economically feasible to retain the whole building. FEDERAL AND STATE LAW The preservation of historic and cultural resources has been a part of national policy throughout this century with the passage of the Antiquities Act of 1906, the Historic Sites Act of 1935, and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. The - 129 - 6 constitutional -of historic preservation qhs been affirmed by the Supreme Court in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City (1978). The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 directed the federal government to to assist local governments in expanding and accelerating local historic preservation programs and activities. This Act provided for the establishment of a historic preservation agency in each state. The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), headed by a State Historic Preservation Officer, is responsible for administering preservation programs set up by federal and state law. California is also served by the State Historical Resources Commission, a citizens group appointed by the Governor. REGISTRATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES AND SITES Local governments may conduct surveys of local historic resources either on their own or with the assistance of OHP staff. The survey results then go into the statewide inventory and becomes part of a computerized database. Once a local historic resource has been identified, it may be nominated for placement on the federal or state lists. OHP staff reviews nominations to the National Register of Historic Places, and'then submits the nominations to the State Historic Resources Commission. If approved, the nominations are sent to the Keeper of the National Register for acceptance. OHP also administers two state registration programs: (1) State Historic Landmarks, which are properties of statewide significance; and (2) Points of Historic Interest, which are properties or sites of local significance. OHP is responsible for the administration of two federal certification programs that offer differing benefits to local communities : (1) Certified Local Ordinance; and (2.) Certified Local Government. Certified Local Ordinance A local government may apply for Certified Local Ordinance status when it has adopted an ordinance that establishes a historic preservation commission which is responsible for the identification of historic properties/sites and for at least the review and comment on proposed projects affecting significant historic properties. The historic preservation commission may designate local historic districts that qualify for Certified Local District status if such districts meet the national Register of Historic Places criteria. Property owners are eligible for federal 20% investment tax credits for the costs of rehabilitation work on income-producing historic structures located within Certified Local Districts. In addition, this certification program provides eligibility for a charitable contribution tax deduction to owners of historic properties, including private residences, for donating conservation easements for historic preservation purposes. - 130 - 7. • Although there is no one standardized format for a historic preservation ordinance, the American Planning Association (APA) recommends that the ordinance contain the following ten components: 1. Purpose of the ordinance; 2. Creation of a historic preservation commission; 3. Powers and authority of the historic preservation commission; 4. Criteria for designation of historic landmarks and/or historic districts; 5. Procedures for nomination and designation of landmarks; 6. Types of actions that are reviewable by the historic preservation commission, e.g. alteration, construction, demolition, removal; 7. General criteria and specific guidelines for reviewable actions; 8. Criteria for economic hardship certification; 9. Appeal procedures for commission actions; and 10. Fines and penalties for violation of ordinance provisions. Certified Local Government Adoption of the above-described ordinance is also necessary to receive state certification as a Certified Local Government (CLG), which is based on the 1980 amendments to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. A CLG designation enables local governments to compete for federal Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) monies, which is administered in California by OHP. At least ten percent of California's annual HPF allocation is transferred to CLGs for historic preservation activities. All CLG5 are eligible to receive funds from the state CLG share of the annual HPF grant award, but the state is not required to award funds to all eligible CLGs. These funds are awarded on a competitive basis, with the intent to distribute these funds to as many eligible CLGS as possible, based on the following priorities and criteria: 1. The CLG demonstrates a clear understanding of the state and local historic preservation programs contributing toward the identification, evaluation, and protection of significant cultural resources within the jurisdiction of the local government; 2. The CLG provides adequate matching local share (50%) for the federal grant-in-aid. - 131 - p • 3. A CLG requesting an expanded level of state participation receives a higher priority in the selection process; and 4. The CLG presents realistic goals that are attainable within the funding period. In addition to HPF allocations, CLGs may receive technical assistance and training from OHP. CLGs also become part of a national technical assistance network. Local governments, e.g. cities, may submit applications for certification into the CLG program in writing from the chief elected local official, e.g. mayor. The state shall respond to the local government request within 45 days of receiving the application. A committee of OHP staff members shall review the certification applications to determine the local government's ability to meet state requirements at either one of two levels of participation: (1) threshold level of participation; or (2) expanded level of participation. When a local government's certification request has been approved in accordance with the state's approved certification process, the state shall prepare a written certification agreement for presentation to the local government. Local governments may be certified to participate in the CLG program at the threshold level of participation by complying with the following requirements: 1. Enforce appropriate state or local legislation for the designation and protection of historic properties; 2. Establish an adequate and qualified historic preservation review commission; 3. Maintain a system for the survey and inventory of historic properties; 4. Provide for adequate public participation in the local historic preservation program; and 5. Satisfactorily perform the responsibilities delegated to the CLG by the state. In addition, local governments may be certified to participate in the CLG program at the expanded level of participation by fulfilling selected elements of the following requirements: 1. The CLG shall adopt a historic preservation ordinance containing the following: (1) a declaration of policy clearly reciting the reasons for enacting the ordinance and specifically containing a general welfare clause illustrating that historic preservation is in the public interest; (2) authorization for the creation of a historic preservation commission, with specific provisions for the powers and duties of the commission; - 132 - 9 • (3) historic survey and registration provisions for compiling, updating and maintaining an inventory of local historic resources; (4) strict criminal and civic penalty provisions to ensure enforcement capability and credibility; and (5) precise operational definitions for such terms as preservation commission, historic districts, eligibility criteria, alteration and improvement standards, demolition stays, and other preservation terminology; 2. The CLG may adopt a historic preservation element for its General Plan and establish procedures for implementation of the element; 3. The CLG shall participate in the environmental review of local projects, and the commission may review and comment on permit actions affecting significant listed historic properties and other resources eligible for listing in accordance with local ordinance requirements and the California Environmental, Quality Act. 4. The CLG may participate in the review and comment on historic preservation certification applications for tax incentives; 5. The CLG may develop educational programs promoting historic preservation at the local level; 6. Commission members may act in an advisory capacity to other officials and departments within the local government and act as a liaison on behalf of the CLG to individuals and organizations; 7. The CLG may participate in the Mills Act property -tax relief program for owners of historic properties; and 8. The CLG may participate in the Marks Historical Rehabilitation Act for issuance of tax-exempt industrial development bonds, providing that the commission shall serve as all or part of the required citizen advisory board. POTENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR HISTORIC RESOURCE DESIGNATION Based on discussions with representatives from the Hermosa Beach Historical Society and other interested individuals, staff has prepared a preliminary list of properties and sites that could be considered locally significant and potential candidates for future historic designation (see Map 17). This list was compiled from information provided by members of the Hermosa Beach Historical Society and the publication Castles On The Sand (1977) by Patricia Gazin. The following is not meant to be a final or exhaustive representation of all community resources. - 133 - 1 ZONING Chapter 17.53 Historic Resources Preservation 17.53. 040 Definitions. A. Alteration means any exterior or Interior changes or modification of any landmark Including, but not limited to, exterior or Interior changes to or modifications to a structure or any of its architectural details or visual characteristics, including paint color and surface texture, grading, surface paving, and new structures. B. Certificate of Appropriateness means a certificate approving such plans, specifications, design, or statements of work, for any proposed alteration, restoration, demolition, removal, or relocation, In whole or In part, of or to improvements relative to designated landmarks, or landmarks contemplated for historic preservation designation as reflected In Planning Commission Resolution No. 98-58. C. Council means the City Council. D. Demolition means any acts that destroys In whole or in part a building, structure, or improvement. E. Exterior and Interior architectural feature means the architectural styles, design, general arrangement, components, natural features and all the outer surfaces of an Improvement, including, but not limited to, the kind and texture of the building material, the type and style of all, windows, doors, lights, signs, walls, fences, and other fixtures appurtenant to such Improvement. F. Historic resource means any Improvement, building, structure, landscape, sign, feature, site, place, or area of scientific, aesthetic, educational, cultural, architectural, or historic significance to the citizens of the City, Including, but not limited to the resources Identified In Planning Commission Resolution No. 98-58. .r,>... . G. Improvement means any_bui[ding,.structure/place, wall, fence/gate, sign, landscaping, or other objectconstituting a physical alteration of real •v..,. property, or any part of such alteration. c.:' ., a r 1I H. Landmark means any improvement that has historical, cultural, aesthetic or architectural character or value, or which represents one or more architectural periods or styles typical to the history of the City, and that has been designated as a landmark pursuant to this chapter. I. Ordinary maintenance means any cleaning, painting, or similar work that does not result in the alteration of an Improvement. J. Person means any individual, association, partnership, firm, corporation, public agency, or political subdivision. K. Relocation means the displacement of any Improvement within the same site. L. Removal means the displacement of any Improvement from the site. 14. Restoration means the act or process of accurately recovering the form and details of a property and Its setting as It appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of later work or by the replacement of missing earlier work. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.020 Purpose and intent. The purpose of this chapter Is to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare by providing for the identification, protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of historic resources such as buildings, structures, sites, and places within the City that reflect special elements of the City's architectural, artistic, cultural, historical, political, and social heritage for the following reasons: A. To safeguard the City's heritage by encouraging the protection of landmarks representing significant elements of its history; B. To foster civic and neighborhood pride and a sense of identity based on an appreciation of the City's past and the recognition and use of historic resources; C. To enhance the visual character of the City by preserving diverse architectural styles reflecting phases of the City's history and by encouraging complementary contemporary design and construction; D. To strengthen the economy of the City by protecting and enhancing the City's attractions to residents, tourists, and visitors; E. To stabilize and Improve property values within the City by recognizing historic landmarks and by protecting areas of historic buildings from encroachment by Incompatible design; 1P- F. To promote the enjoyment and use of historic resources appropriate for the education and recreation of the people of the city; G. To Integrate the preservation of historic resources and the extraction of relevant data from such resources Into public and private land management and development processes; H. To conserve valuable material and energy resources by ongoing use and maintenance of the existing built environment; and I. To take whatever steps are reasonable and necessary to safeguard the property rights of owners whose property is declared to be a landmark. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53. 030 Area of application. This chapter shall apply to all historic resources, publicly and privately owned, within the corporate limits of the City of Hermosa Beach. (Ord. 98- 1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.050 Powers and duties. The City Council shall have the following powers and duties in the Implementation of this chapter:. A. Study, review, conduct public hearings, and make decisions regarding proposed designations and removal of designations of landmarks. B. Maintain a register of landmarks within the City. C. Determine an appropriate system of markers for landmarks. D. Adopt application and subrhlttal requirements for Certificates of Appropriateness to alter, restore, demolish, remove, or relocate any landmark. E. Review and renderldeclslons regarding all alteration,. restoration, -, demolition, removal, and relocation proposals related to landmarks In /3 • • conjunction with applications for Certificates of Appropriateness pursuant to this Chapter. F. Develop, or cause to be developed, and recommend to the City Council a program of incentives for preservation of historic resources. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.060 Landmark designation criteria. For the purposes of this chapter, an historic resource may be designated a landmark, pursuant to Sections 17.53.070 through 17.53.120 of this Chapter, If It meets one or more of the following criteria: A. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history; or B. It Is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history; or C. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or Is a valuable example of the use of Indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or D. It is representative of the notable work of a builder, designer, or architect; or E. Its unique location or singular physical characteristic(s) represents an established and familiar visual feature or landmark of a neighborhood, community, or the City. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.070 Nomination and application requirements, landmark. Nominations of an historic resource as a landmark shall be made by the City, or by application of the property owner or property owners representing a majority or controlling Interest In the property on which the resource Is Iocated. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.080 Minimum eligibility requirement, landmark. In order to be eligible for consideration as a landmark, an historic resource must be at least 50 years old; with the exception that an historic resource of at least 30 years old may be eligible if the Council determines that the resource is exceptional, or that it is threatened by demolition, removal, relocation, or inappropriate alteration. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.090 Delay of work pending hearing. Once a nomination or completed application has been accepted for the designation of a landmark; no building, alteration, demolition, removal, or relocation permits for any historic resource, improvement, building, or structure relative to a proposed landmark, shall be issued until a final determination Is made regarding the proposed designation, except as provided under Section 17.53.200 of this Chapter. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.100 Council study and determination. Not more than 45 days from the nomination or the acceptance of a completed application for the designation of a landmark, a public hearing shall be scheduled before the Council to study the proposed designation and to determine its eligibility and qualifications. Notice of the date, place, time and purpose of hearings shall be given by first class mail to the owner(s) of all nominated resource(S) at least ten days prior to the date of the public hearing, using the names and addresses of such owners as shown on the latest equalized assessment rolls and shall be advertised In a newspaper of general circulation at least ten clays prior to the hearing. The Council may also give such other notice as they deem desirable and practicable. Following the public hearing, but within no more than 70 days from the date of the Initial hearing, the Council shall dedde to approve, In whole or In part, or disapprove the designation. All decisions to approve or disapprove designations shaft tie made by resolutlori, and shall set forth -the findings and reasons relied upon In making the determination. The time limit for making a dedsl'on"ma 'be &tended at#Fie' i y request orwith the concurrence of the appllcant(s)'(Ord ' 91186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.110 Notice of designation, City departments. Notice of the designation of a landmark shall be transmitted to all appropriate City departments and any other interested govemmental and civic agencies. Each City department shall Incorporate the notice of designation into its records, so that future decisions or permissions regarding or affecting a landmark shall be made with the knowledge of the designation. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.120 Removal of designation. A. In the event of substantial destruction of a landmark, the owner or owners of a landmark may apply for removal of designation. The City Council may also Initiate removal in such circumstances. The removal of a designation for this reason shall be processed and decided In the same manner as designations as set forth In this Article, with the additional requirement that the determination of substantial destruction shall be set forth in the findings of the Council. B. The complete demolition or removal of a landmark shall result In the removal of the landmark designation. C. Once a landmark designation has been removed, affected properties shall no longer be subject to any provision or regulation of this ordinance. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.130 Use of California Historical Building Code. All repairs, alterations, restorations, or changes in use of existing buildings and structures designated as landmarks may conform to the standards of the California Historical Building Code as an alternative to complying with /C building standards set forth in Title 15 of this Code, notwithstanding the fact that such buildings may be nonconforming. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.140 Certificate of Appropriateness required. A. No person shall alter, restore, demolish, remove, or relocate any interior or exterior improvement or architectural feature of a landmark or potential landmark on a list of historic resources established by City Council being considered for landmark status, or alter, restore, place, erect, remove, or relocate any permanent sign visible from a public right-of-way without being granted a Certificate of Appropriateness, except as provided under Section 17.53.200 of this Chapter. Approval of such work shall be required even if no other permits or entitlements are required by the City. B. Minor Alterations. The Council may, by resolution, adopt a list of those types of alterations that are subject to approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness that are deemed to be "minor" In nature. The Council may modify the list of minor alterations from time to time by resolution as circumstances warrant. Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness involving only minor alterations shall be reviewed pursuant to procedures in Section 17.53.150(E). (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.150 Review procedures for Certificates of Appropriateness. The following procedures shall be followed in processing applications for Certificates of Appropriateness. A. Application. An application shall be filed by the applicant with the City Clerk. B. Application Materials. Such application shall be accompanied by such materials as are required by the Community Development. Department that are reasonably necessary for the proper review of the proposed project. • C. Noticing. . 1. Minor alterations. tslo public noticing shall be required for applications for Certiflcates of Appropriateness Involving only minoralteratlons. 2.. All applications other..than minor, alterations:: Forappiicatlons involving ;.; other'than,mInoralterations; publicnotice shall be provided pursuant tosectlon,17,68.050 of the,ZonIngOrdinance.,-, Or, /9 D. Economic Hardship. In cases where the applicant intends to seek approval on the basis of economic hardship, the following material shall be submitted as part of the application: 1. For all property: a.)for-profit or not-for-profit corporation, limited partnership, joint venture, or other method; b.)The amount paid for the property, the date of purchase and the party from whom purchased, Including a description of the relationship, if any, between the owner and the person from whom the property was purchased; c.)Remaining balance on any mortgage or other financing secured by the property; d.)Estimated market value of the property both in its current condition, and after completion of the proposed demolition, relocation, or removal, to be presented through an appraisal by a qualified professional expert; e.)A report from a licensed engineer or architect with experience in rehabilitation as to the structural soundness of the structure and its suitability for rehabilitation; f.)An estimate from an architect, developer, real estate consultant, appraiser, or other real estate professional experienced in rehabilitation as to the economic feasibility or reuse of the existing structure on the property; g.)The assessed value of the land and improvements thereon according to the two most recent assessments; h.)Real estate taxes for the previous two (2) years; i.)Annual debt service, if any, for the previous (2) two years; j.)AII appraisals obtained within the previous two (2) years by the owner or applicant in connection with his purchase, financing or ownership of the property. k.)AII listing of the property for sale or rent, price asked and offers received, if any, and I.)Any consideration by the owner as to profitable adaptive uses for the property. (2) For income-produdng property: 1. Annual gross Income from the property for the previous two (2) years; 2. Itemized operating and maintenance expenses from the previous two (2) years; 3. Annual cash flow, if any, for the previous two (2) years. E. Review of Applications Involving Minor Alterations. Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness involving only minor alterations shall be reviewed by the Director of Community Development Department, subject to the following provisions: 1. The Director shall complete his/her review and mail notice to the applicant within 30 days of the date of the acceptance of a completed application of his/her dedsion to approve or conditionally approve the aRpliption or to forward the application to the Council for a dedslon. The notice of decision shall state the findings and reasons relied upon • /8 in reaching the decision. The time limit for Director action may be extended upon the request or with the concurrence of the applicant. 2. Where the decision of the Director is to conditionally approve the application, the decision of the Director shall be final and conclusive unless, within 12 days of the date of notice of the decision, the applicant files with the Planning Division a written appeal setting forth all the points of disagreement with the Director. 3. Where the application has been forwarded or appealed to the Council, the application shall be heard by the Council at Its next available regular meeting, and the Council shall complete its review and render a decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Certificate of Appropriateness within 45 days of the Initial hearing. Decisions of the Council shall be in writing and shall state the findings and reasons relied upon in reaching the decision. F. Review of Other Applications. Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness other than for minor alterations shall be reviewed by the Council, subject to the following provisions: 1. The Coundl shall complete Its review and make a decision within 75 days of the date of the acceptance of a completed application. The time limit for Council action may be extended (1) upon the request or with the concurrence of the applicant; or (2) for failure of the applicant to provide any reasonable additional information or material requested by the Council during the course of its review. 2. Decisions of the Coundl shall be in writing and shall state the findings and reasons relied upon in reaching the decision. 3. For applications for all work other than to demolish or remove a landmark or structure, the Coundl shall decide to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Certificate of Appropriateness. 4. For applications to wholly or partially demolish or remove a landmark, the Coundl shall decide to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness or to Initiate a period of delay prior to granting approval. The delay of approval shall not exceed ninety (90) days. The length of the delay shall be determined in accordance with its intended purpose (e.g. compiling photographic records or arranging for removal to another site). The Coundi may extend any period of delay for up to an additional ninety'(90),days for good cause, except in cases where it has determined,a condition of economic hardship to exist. If no ,. alternative'arrangements have been completed by the expiration of the period of delay or any extension thereof, a Certificate of;; , : ,. •Appropriateness shall be issued without the need for"further action by the Coundl. .... .. 5. For applications seeking approval on the basis of.a finding of economic hardship; the Coundi shall first revieini the application on the basis of criteria contained in Section 17.53.170(D). If theapplicable conditions are determined to not exist, then the application shall be reviewed on the basis of the criteria contained in Sections 17.53.170 (A) -(C). Prior (9 • • to making a final determination In such cases, the Council shall have the authority to invoke a period of delay. Such a period of delay shall not exceed sixty (60) days. During this delay, the Council shall Investigate alternative means to allow for a reasonable use or return from the property or to otherwise preserve the property. (Ord. 98- 1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.160 Criteria for Approval of Certificates of Appropriateness. The City Council shall Issue a Certificate of Appropriateness only when it determines the following conditions to exist as applicable in each case: A. In the case of a landmark, the proposed work (other than demolition or removal); 1. Conforms to the prescriptive standards adopted by the Council; and 2. Will not detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely affect any exterior improvement or exterior architectural feature and 3. Will retain the essential elements that make the resource significant. B. In the case of construction of a new building, structure, or improvement on a site where a landmark is located: 1. The exterior of such improvements will not adversely affect and will be compatible with the external appearance of the existing designated improvements, buildings and structures on such site. C. In the case of the whole or partial demolition or removal of a landmark: 1. The structure and/or site Is a hazard to public health or safety and repairs or stabilization are not physically possible; or 2. The site Is required for a public use which will be of more benefit to the public than the historic resource, and there Is no feasible alternative location for the public use; or 3. Removal of the resource to another site is not feasible or practical; or 4. For a partial demolition or removal, such action will not result in the loss of the essential elements that make the resource significant; or 5. Any Imposed delay of approval or extension thereof has expired. D. In the case where the applicant has requested consideration for approval on the basis of economic hardship: 1. It Is not feasible to remove the resource to another site or otherwise preserve it; and 1 as 2. The denial of the proposed work will work an immediate and substantial hardship on the applicant because of conditions peculiar to the particular improvement; and 3. The property cannot be put to a reasonable use or the owner cannot obtain a reasonable economic return therefrom without approval of the proposed work. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.170 Expiration of Certificate of Appropriateness. A Certificate of Appropriateness shall lapse and become void eighteen (18) months (or shorter period if specified as a condition of approval) from the date of final approval, unless a building permit (if required) has been issued and the work authorized by the Certificate has commenced prior to such expiration date and is diligently pursued to completion. Upon request of the property owner, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be extended by the Council for an additional period of up to twelve (12) months. The Council may approve, approve with conditions, or deny any request for extension. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.180 Revocation of Certificate of Appropriateness. A Certificate of Appropriateness may be revoked or modified for reasons of (1) noncompliance with any terms or conditions of the Certificate; (2) noncompliance with any provisions of this Chapter; or (3) a finding of fraud or misrepresentation used in the process of obtaining the Certificate. Revocation proceedings may be initiated by motion of the Council. Once revocation proceedings have been initiated, all work being done in reliance upon such Certificate or associated permits shall be immediately suspended until a final determination is made regarding the revocation. The decision to revoke a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be made by the Council following a public hearing, with written notice provided to the property owner at least ten days prior thereto..(Ord. 9873186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.190 Ordinary maintenance and repair. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any exterior Improvement or exterior architectural ar feature that does not Involve a change in design, material or external appearance thereof, nor does this Chapter prevent the alteration, restoration, demolition, removal, or relocation of any such Improvement or architectural feature when the Director certifies to the Council that such action is required for the public safety due to an unsafe or dangerous condition and cannot be accomplished under the California Historical Building Code. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53.200 Duty to keep in good repair. The owner, occupant or other person in actual charge of a landmark building structure or improvement, shall keep in good repair the exterior portions of all such buildings, structures, or improvements, and all Interior portions thereof whose maintenance Is necessary to prevent deterioration and decay of any exterior improvement or exterior architectural feature. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) 17.53. 210 Enforcement. A. It shall be the duty of the Director of Community Development Department or the Director's delegate to administer and enforce the provisions of this chapter. B. Methods of enforcement. In addition to the regulations of this chapter, other regulations of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, and other provisions of law which govern the appeal or disapproval of applications for permits, licenses or Certificates of Appropriateness covered by this chapter, the Director shall have the authority to Implement the enforcement thereof by serving notice requiring the removal of any violation of this Chapter upon the owner, agent, occupant or tenant of the improvement, building, structure or land. C. Methods of enforcement. In addition to the foregoing remedies, the City Attorney may Institute any necessary legal proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Chapter, including the ability to maintain an action for Injunctive relief to restrain or enjoin or to cause the correction or removal of any violation of this Chapter, or for an. injunction in appropriate cases. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) Z2 17.53. 220 Penalties. For any action or development covered by this Chapter that is undertaken without the Issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness or that is undertaken without full compliance with the terms and conditions of an issued Certificate of Appropriateness, the Director shall order the action stopped by written notice. It shall be a misdemeanor for any person to carry out any work on any building, structure, improvement, or property In violation of a notice stopping such work or in violation of this Chapter. (Ord. 98-1186 §4, 11/10/98) i Z3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TO NOMINATE THE BUILDING AT 100 THE STRAND AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. On January 27th 2004, the City Council conducted a public meeting to consider an urgency item for nominating the building at 100 The Strand as a historic landmark, pursuant the provision of the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, and to provide adequate notice to the property owner on the proposed nomination. Section 2. Based on the evidence received at the public meeting, the City Council determined that, pursuant to Section 17.53.080 of the Zone Code, the building located at 100 The Strand meets the minimum eligibility requirement for landmark designation of being at least 50 years old in that factual records indicate that the building was constructed in 1923 and is currently 81 years old. Section 3. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby nominates the building located at 100 The Strand to be a historic landmark pursuant to Section 17.53.070 of the Historic Building Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 27th day of January 2004 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY Rsnomt00 1 Feb 03 04 02:OOp Ja.stashay February 3, 2004 Mr. Sol Blumenfeld, Director CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Community Development Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 50.90-9451 P.2 Re: PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: PCR Services Corporation (PCR) is pleased to respond to your inquiry to provide historical consulting services for the City of Hermosa Beach. The tasks associated with the specific services requested will include the following: • Conduct site inspection/field visit, including photography, of subject property; • Compile and analyze existing research material, supplement as necessary; • Review and implement relevant federal, state, and local regulations and standards that apply to the identification and surveying of historic properties; • Evaluate subject property using federal, state, and local significance criteria. All survey work shall be consistent with procedures previously established by state and federal guidelines for conducting historic preservation work; and • Prepare a "Report of Findings' and California Historic Resources Inventory form (DPR523) for the subject property. Our proposed budget for the services outlined above, alluding meetings/public hearings, is approximately $4,450. Attendance at public hearings and/or other meetings will be billed separately at a time and material rate. Billing rates are provided as Attachment A to this proposal. In reviewing PCR's proposal, please feel free to contact the undersigned for any questions you may have regarding this scope of work. Thank you for contacting us and considering PCR. We look forward to working with you again. Sincerely, PCR SERVI .FS_ CORPORATION Jan Ostashay Director of Cultural Resources Management • One Venture, Suite 150, Irvine, California 92618 wrap= www.ptrnet.eom TEL 949.753.7001 s.: 949.753.7002 02/03/04 15:01 TX/RX NO.7604 P.002 Feb 03 04 02:OOp Jalstashay Mr. Sol Blumenfeld, Director CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH February 3, 2004 - Page 2 ATTACHMENT A 5690-9451 P.3 PCR 2004 BILLING RATES AND EXPENSE CHARGES PROFESSIONAL TIME Cultural Resources Director $ 129.00/hour Principal Historian $ 108.00/hour Senior Historian $ 103.00/hour Historian $ 93.00/hour Associate Historian $ 82.00/hour Assistant Historian $ 72.00/hour Support Graphics Specialist $ 77.00/hour Publications Specialist $ 67.00/hour Production Specialist $ 62.00/hour DIRECT EXPENSES The following direct expenses will be billed at 110.00% of actual cost: ■ Purchase or rental of project materials and special supplies; • Reproduction, printing and photographic costs; • Postage, delivery, telephone and other communication costs when requested or approved by client; • Project -related mileage necessarily incurred. 02/03/04 15:01 TX/RX NO.7604 P.003 C Feb 03 04 02:OOp Ja.stashas Mr. Sol Blumenfeld, Director CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH February 3.2004 - Page 3 561190-5451 p.4 BILLING TERMS • Unless other contractual terms are agreed upon, PCR invoices on a monthly basis and expects payment 30 days from date of invoice. • PCR's scheduling commitments are made and taken seriously. However, PCR reserves the right to modify performance schedules in instances where payment of PCR invoices falls behind agreed-upon terms. ■ PCR =calibrates its billing rata for professional time each calendar year and reserves the right to raise the billing rate for one or more professional categories by no more than 5% once in twelve calendar months. 02/03/04 15:01 TX/RX NO.7604 P.004 a7 • • Steve Page 1 of 2 From: Robin Maynard Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 7:43 AM To: Steve Subject: FW: Historic Preservation Designation of Old Houses in Hermosa Beach ----Original Message ----- From: City Clerk Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 7:27 AM To: Robin Maynard Subject: FW: Historic Preservation Designation of Old Houses in Hermosa Beach Original Message ---- From: Leanne and Andy Clifton [mailto:hermosa5@adelphia.net] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 12:17 PM To: City Clerk Cc: Andy/Leanne Clifton Subject: Historic Preservation Designation of Old Houses in Hermosa Beach Dear City Manager Steve Burrel, and Councilmen Edgerton, Tucker, Yoon, Revicsky,and Keggan; Please, DO NOT START HISTORIC PRESERVATION STATUS DESIGNATION OF OLD HOUSES IN HERMOSA BEACH BY NEIGHBORS AND THE CITY! This is a direct assault on private property rights that would allow neighbors, previous owners, and well meaning, but misguided City officials to allow confiscation of private property value from owners of properties with old houses on them, It is absolutely unfair to require a private property owner to keep his old house for the pleasure of someone who has not paid for it, who does not pay the property taxes on it, and who does not have to five in it or maintain it. If the City, or a selfish, meddling neighbor wants to keep an old house, they can and should volunteer to move the structure to Valley Park and make a museum out of It like Manhattan Beach did, or they can and should pay the property owner the full market value of the property! This is just the same as me volunteering your house's front yard or structure to be a park without paying you for it. This is unequal treatment under the law and confiscation of property without fair market compensation. This will Invite scads of lawsuits against the City and the meddling neighbors, by irate owners of old houses In Hermosa, and there are plenty of those here. If this bad idea goes forward, we will immediately bring this to the attention of the Pacific Legal Foundation (we are members), which regularly brings lawsuits against govemment agencies and entities that usurp private property rights without fair market value compensation to the victims. Thank You, Andrew and Leanne Clifton 525 24th Place 2/2/2004 2S' • / 00 1WE Sr -,C AAAR He1M40s4 r3Ete • -/ovSe 13Ul Li- /Iv iga8 .8 y V.S.7CEAsl-Ay CoA--tkoLLEE, ig/zC0/7-Et`_tv/Ll Nafro y. Same /vt4Esr/ivC frx75 AL��: CLner E>a89« Spc`N* !els P/4'51- /-&M yr1Dov 1/EA-E; S/aI?>E WAS CAkoC j,DnDAA�a. c�.vc7ioivrvC- >C/� use 2 774 z- So .5 J7' WA5 H 1-t&Ir/Mf1TE / / R`D to4/Z- x .x r' W M S 41_5E 45 A Spy }/Dvs& wP'/f 7-E-LESCopEs DJJ THS CHANNeL• y,y - nit-- gels 7-/-jE r, V Sl/euJ R/pT/DE all 1_5' p/ier gionAS`SV / E qD`s 7�1���lScovEQjr etl/twNEL is 7JOeUMLx/-rgycy CA) THE /y E C -q ?s u A/Am vsED 7Hi.s f-lovS E - rit "'sr MAaarA/'r /°SYMT / s 7-Mp r TN e -M -v--2 of h o u-st i s ve v 1' Se ccKd JA/m ocd e of o f >�iN--2 / AmPrvF,z,c. »IF/bCt or- h tbkuooD -77140 Ee 7109 r *h9 5 .. epic /v rr ,-/;#1/ / /rEs 7.,/, 4.7 <�NT/A'n p1A5-rse f4✓n "e/�/ekkn/ wi/ee'ty 2Fs• se-opzc�ta /n- is �jir-vicLL7' �z, P Yr A M- /N TO NAA -'c j� ; P /�Cnteye- LEADe /�o Ar AA' m sro,e/C Resss4 ✓A770A. e01-71-/17-7FF Loo/ /Ain 77/ e COLTiiP'R t- VALUE Or Tlt/ S aeWb77F4,4 57,01/aY/z"E --r4 E. e;ry, rr >i r,v F/RST /Vass yCV SEE CA/ >W.em S�1the-,D /vo4.27-/ / v7 -z, 1/4-7/241,05/1 r/2 o vt /�Ek oNIJa. Hint ISA $LeAUNt�JOv�eF THEPECNA �1,+[� o O R` }feMES LET ONE artist LAST LIP -rttr.euett OUR. rim aE�tS. 3� January 29, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council WE THE UNDERSIGNED support the preservation of the historic structure located at 100 the Strand in Hermosa Beach. Built in 1928, this structure was once a functioning lighthouse and eligible for preservation as such under the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the National Preservation Act. In 1939, it was the honeymoon retreat for Clark Gable and Carole Lombard. During World War II, it served our armed forces as an observation station guarding the channel. The home is made of original American Heart of Redwood and is of classic French Normandy design. It is often photographed and has been featured on numerous television shows. We urge the City to take the necessary actions to insure this structure's preservation and ask to be notified of all meetings and hearings related to the certification of this structure in accordance with Chapter 17.53 of the Historic Resources Preservation Ordinance of Hermosa Beach. 31 There are 93 signatures of concerned citizens as of February 2, 2004. 32- • sLaNC Wjt . ri-+tEfiEFORT TO 5 -TOP T vvieL-GfrINC_ BFROM TLEAREURE. 2)U6uM Tlit=, HOU 3E pow ICC THE5-1-RAND, LeZr: (biro 7-CS.crtaaar, 14 • :) Tc a 73e'tc%, , t oz -t7 1. �, I °01- � (aro, 57 3- W?3y;S"L Selma.. t1&cc l2 VE C/j SD ':111 F, i 4-e,4-k=ev T 03. lin R2e._v st / b y Pont. 3<`--L g z77 I/4YV\a.rlk Edwards 2- R' i-lec vv.osa M* W i-%5, a\ o o>5 `} S. >ni e44-lat q. 31 /oo 57zVrn, 1-1. 13. r0- u q5-1 ERCA RoDI r CtruS 3n\ pc\\ Rea -0 5 41t,‘. Do✓, 7,2 7he chask.an rkg, soosy 4. 3z1) 'AI . GWtj wag/ �i4. 917701 1411'0ctrroA 1 ms -e a3 Z g Cl•e lsea. (-4, palls domin, CA R a37 y 11.Dn � 64ClEr7a251 33 19. • Z ,,UPPoLT TH- • 1"Fory-r- To S;1'0 rci rfl MSG (3!%LL FRoIM Te_ARbvC DoWni rH-c LkUSe ,ST loorriaSrsm.uD, °° Ate. a Cer \ CrY14 e&CL 1 ,b is. !7„ f� Jr- 114----- / 7/1 r• IS. /7/1 9 s. icSki Rye dA ave you.�. &entt /fedondc Beach 90a77 to/ eK tcn Att 74 . 9o7-rfrt 34C Z SupPoPT7HE EFilkCT 70 STOp7HE WRE(•INC BALL FROM .TEARING- "DOWN -THE I3EALT IFCL House eu«T /N 192.8 AT i 00 THE STRAND, M a= P -MO A ID`. _IOD\ Tra: jr¢t„�D dui/n.>,,,�, (1" 77/C srof io). co 1146 5. T2/-+'^ c'\ �:z s az. CSR tAp, i 4r-I6r''7 si hI3 e"I `ioaSY CZ0 1d N TC.0 Scn �5c /G/.rsJ, Q1.4(444 6 I ylUcrs iv< galX0,37 /��cf, y'67 V `'' 2 /v 5. ilill74214 !Alt F; ).-9011 911e^ \coo l sf its 30. MA -e 228 Nl `knit a4 6 49 141 1 a. x I\o\ \l "S \-‘V Car «v;S 32.4nn 'T/'9ucz MOO-FCairviCW ro( N&o41 Cosmo 1 -4 -CSG V& 4° 33. lar., r. 4,G rancr 5&me 45 ftbc 'rra!) f\ARA Vii. 6 Pcec ai o2 eTA 4ct-, P11NI 4A\ kithef) b TP -B, (Pr no rfl 3S- S up p o r -r YW S F uRT rto STo p 7-4 14)4B -0-m,..- (3N « 'F POM TEAL I NC- Dbu»v -rHe HOUSE- A47 1007' E grMA'D, fSR- rn DSA /B -mc r1. l - a. 4- o `f - 7cn kmou}-Qr I 03 fluu 613724-2&( /fl. tie 411. 117 48. [Anba 11^9g9- 72e 2/sr 1/5 -371 -os -az tibm ta,\ rme, CCA; '5 v79 k\M SCE FISTAmEN.PAQE 36 1.11:f tcq WI PcarOn yCVS I FC erst t( i/. 69_6-e (-- 1V N2- 2M ate, t,:1,. 4— • i f [,Mc iC/kfb-t% &c,.�.A �. r IS NCto&sa Et bco ( Weryko�K',cc`t:t 9/6n`- - Jr# - fl w6 rr CA- VA011itrAtkelk, SM z th-k 5f-raA-4 37::. SE n-cuPaim 1 .yutfric, hit 4,,a -y. - vesi. u2Y 379 Q.2_399,00 221 f / I1440 '£S amz bt. lE)15-Sc,yj.N sal; " tw ZZ� cc° z-, L G (° 1 �,� V . ell/ y�°N 1111 II 1-I �0 �� yo -Lc d�Ofl ,it �n >A1/ 141 dit417p y)/ fr ,eTh X92— 2�la� •c&sot,iTa/±714 a'vb311s Et ill_ 00/ asnnt1 FI._ nrmQQ -DraisciaL 1^1021 -J Vg 7<v 1>03VM 3H4- dcij s al-. £ od d a a HL JJtI od d n.s 1 • SvppOR-r THE $Form -To STOP ?-H WRECKING- BALL FROM ?CARING- 17ow&'THE BEAUTI puL HOUSE GUILT av 19'22 Al- 100 THE STRAND, 1-IErQMOsA /1 1° L c(l4t ) Tuygarf 66• 67, Me yh ah 7aygar+ 69.-37k 0 K Ea q g i6s s 6-w, 51-. RrMOSG Be 0A Vaslo (a 70. 6 <RonFicr4 c B7z-7,-{7e 72, Kae-t5r5::3- /0355 GJ pAZ-12elf. 2' /74-1C�i, ce_ , :-�` 7 r � . 3 a 3/0 ^1/43 i (via (Fdt4 sr LtM 01- goo 2 c(2f- /to , /019/ / *7, G, fie, t99 o c1 l PILO t'Uc l 5 tia r.C.--efok)00 ---ctscb cio 9.02[77 ,fie47;-0` F'e`w`) `,z 3VPPOR'T E VReRv"iw u. i roc. i!tlsi�Jerc Si 1)&TIMSaE AT /Jr - 7 A ANA) 11'8. 27 t Ave- 90 Z /f Tica-6 ( I 702 ErE 5/ 2tvo #5 , ii6, (4- 1 7z Sit4--aL 7 ) me ra 102.9/ ► FA"S 4/4110- f I7t1&-pg, //erg rid � Q-Q�� beeo! ,:� /s, atS xLiV6 83. 39- 900 S• Cacr,;,, A• 1-ecn1/44 Euct,.,( go -2--n / 73,t ,l 7—a 4. Ot7/Ret 1-13cQ (.ao fl-ve- CC-end/JO- / 0-42 /n 4"6> CG /GZ��. / .� •(d i< VL nAir; en /. Vim' ziala 3z,' Mar) r -05,LN ayit Anew f$ )103 t1'3 iec sncL 3e44GVl �j GL/7 `Q^1 �9� (t 6s4 `%o 2-5Y 2-5- ktaiv q9 b►�k �,N, 155o g '` 1 - i.91 `'4 1(1 705 VICAql 1.205tv\tts41\ is‘ v1/4 h h '3 fk u3°� r 'flus,- fr443 -?cL. • • I SUPPORT THE PRESERVATION OF THE HISTORIC STRUCTURE AT 100 THE STRAND HERMOSA BEACH CM, /tooY (-)A- v\kfitAmr, \ O oks e 0 G-ro,,,, d vkt-- 9s UJct I,S s 0_ Pp (ot '7°L7 (-fret. P -t -Sr, AAA., ^a hoe . N Redcn-+da &tech c•i- 9027-7 14. IA oAri anti 1 e, S�, CA Avt . 41 / Wio,-Jlo Gok �1 �ay\ hcrLkcy t303- f SkecJ # S 98 -Da^^'"'` Novu,L., 6�t &�? oaf 133 t )4 •� �f g. scoff Gsp� 2 /1 r von f/ 'A /ooze / p0. juaro- R". 5S(4 10 tS /J 6Q'''(° LA- you a`► /or. ar5•f-avo tos /Lid( s, tom • 90001 ��' 2 �%` /a 2. rn'i or //6'l'i/(6.-CA �/ f rvf le robin,11(49- 8'4 /03 �abri Mqo `/ a it. 5 ba,uxn\o a;CA-- /05 R./) p`►""' ' s QeLc,L C3exJ o2? •1 support- -r• prt ...ry -10i or Z4c ,CSr e, s7w.cethe-fre-' tt /00 77f- St1tND, "Ei2/ ec5hl t S?1C H - Fe b `f r 4,:p0 y 1". 70e Ize-R-SrVar 30c S C,o1J D /07C ocA t S+ Re% 4 ops `f• /"qa f'Aq 3' ar Pv& f-te/mbSR- gaCL, 64 9oa3/ io9 ` e Xk . M 504v•ie•4 i S 2137-S rneyle4 St- 1-D,VaoCe Cly gtso2— fia Jkh ;rv�,►�- ' --szc\ tooa Rao; / 130 3 H "4iash ,gvim' RMos� S GlccA 90254-+/ • =. 5u 10/0 o/Y i 719L -E teEE.5 t=i2v4Yiep fe 0A,D c)*t • 1 p,= 5r,tPCTzWE gt !oo FE8. ¥, L Y 12 biSg gozhL rte Nis rt',€' c, F/4 CYC sot -.._ 5�ppc n Tfik - PR ESER V.1T/CAJ OF THE t-IIST OR IG sri Uc i UP E AT Ix 'THE c1Qii/10S -85/+0+, FE3 3 O 'l3, us -1 t-tis“, P G -G ite yih.- fly a��*� P, , d�` Vtic eaeckt., cA c10 23,1 vtot 574 tecC alv tkvoa) toe ck gasif -'.cebavi Sc 83.4. tom, ceot- '1. Vi`t tassa 0 r ` 53e-9 6� If ijet eo 'Q1030/ s u PPS'rtT E FFOKr TO -S T c, tt-{ E CLEC %N C— ALL t &OM 1E runic- towN THE House- AT 100 THE sTIQAN1D, r-4GPJ4OsA 6e,Ae-H, /9 33 Xan ----a-0- a-- , --r -c r4 Pa r Y lerds1 67t r -.fit 070 /v s , AJ s •ie, 1Qa-77 Co L7 Ai. C--' ""e isz tl -1`51- 11 - ZS s r 74Lyfl/FJ4Inr)ofZ 2F 6 7 Dj bim_t_ — 040 10. �t-E iet_ alfirtedv P 0 is 01, Z NR. 661 - Fiaea gif 9o3-77 te.0 &t eor:(gds (1 ?-6 raiatte 4- -v6 2 i 3 ep ate- �6 • • Page 1of1 Subject: FW: Landmark Beach House ----Original Message ---- From: Jbrsnowfury@aol.com [mailtoibrsnowfury@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 8:08 AM To: City Clerk Subject: Landmark Beach House Hermosa Beach City Council, Please save the old house at 100 Strand! It adds a lot of character and charm to the beach front. If you were ever to take a stand against demolition and save a house on the Strand, this is one definitely worth the effort. Thank you. JBR 2/5/2004 Edna.., a LBS,Nia ,5215 Tartar BAS Torrance,CA9osoi-4077 ; I involved pm.. -Strand home should be.preerved .n In 1970,whenIwas. a17 -year-old boy fio- teem— °="f, ranee, I fell In love with the house at 100 The Strand, : ;:.. =e with its unique "lighthouse" on the southwest corner, and pseudo-Eu•ropean-styling Idetetminedthen f;, r,:rt and there that when I became trained for a pereer 1 and joined the workforce,IWeald hut th('shouse , 'and live in it. Given real estate priceslit the late 1960s and early 1970s, this was not an unrealistic aspire- don. spira tion.Alas, the wild escalation of South Bayreal estate _.ices_ ,.-..:__.. nncea m._ tl—ielafe.1970s destrpyed that dtemtt • But the house remains, In my opinion; an embodi • ment of Hermosa Beach. Of course, I remember when The Strand was a row of biungalows and distinctive . t 'but Unpretentious housesoccupied bypeoplewith 't surfboards, wet suits, fishing poles, etc. —a far cry ; from the ostentatious fishbowl mansions that line the walkway now, which might just as well have signs On them that say." Look at ME! Look how nail rine Isthisjtistw,isifil.nostalgiaforabygoneera?Alittle,I '., guess. ButI think destroying the house at 104 The Strand, as Is planned by its current owner; would be a tragedy I Implore the current owner Please don't do it. Sell "the house to an indlvfduelld organization or entity that will preset* andr storetl.Youwvon'thavetolosea cent. I can't give you alcal intelligent or sound , business` reason to do thie.tinJustbegging °- n —JOHN LANSING San Pea 72,+ity 5tEE2E FEB: 4? Eas Rip d VOLUME 3003V, NUMBER 24 JANUARY 29, 2004 EL SEGUNDO • HERMOSA BEACH MANHATTAN BEACH • REDONDO BEACH HOMETOWN NEWS WaerFront Localism at Indicator In Palos Verdes took a bad wipe-out recently when a Superior Court Judge awarded 1450,000 to a Hermosa surfer who was allegedly assaulted by an Indicator local. Photo by Kevin Cody EXPENSIVE INDICATOR: Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ramona See has ordered Palos Verdes surfer Luke Millican to pay 1450,000 to Hermosa Beach surfer Tunonthy Banos as the result of a fight the two engaged in at Indicator beach in Palen Verdes on Jan. 4, 2002. Ina civil suit against Millican and six fellow Indicator locals,' Banns alleged that he and his son Tommy, 19, were attacked when they refused the locals' demand that they not surf at the beach. Timothy Banos, a house painter, suffered a severe knee injury dur- ing the fight. Banes' attorney Mike Sisson said Judge See entered a default judgment against Millican, who did not present a defense against the lawsuit. The suits against the six other defendants were set- tled for minor amounts, Sisson said. Neither Sisson nor Millican were avail- able for comment... CRY ME A PUDDLE: An Item before the Hermosa Beach City Council regarded ways to alleviate puddles on Myrtle Avenue. Wearing a New England Patriots football jer- sey, Councilman Sam Edgerton said, 'What are we talking about? Don't we have bigger issues to deal with? Later, a resident deliv- ered an impassioned, puddle -related address But bordered on tears.. Ger YOUR STORY STRAIGHT, MAN: A man entered through the unlocked front door of a Redondo home last week and was deep within the residence when he bumped into the homeowner. He said he was look- ing for a garage sale. The man, who police later discovered was on parole for previous burglary convictions, was carrying a box But requested donations for a sick child. Police suspected this was a ruse and arrest- ed the man on suspicion of burglary... ER Star slacker A Hermosan's utter Inability to cope is making him famous by David Rosenfeld Producers of the new reality -based television show Todd TV sifted through more than 1,200 candidates to find the most aimless, helpless and clueless. They found none quite as directionless as Hermosa Beach resident lbdd Santos. Scouring Southern California for ■ person hapless enough to surrender his entire life to the forces of television, the producers were irresistibly attract- ed to the inane lifestyle of Santos, who lives in a house on the Strand near the Redondo Beach break wall. Chosen for his extroverted charm and dim wits, Santos needed help. 'America decides. He obeys,' the show announced in its opener. The premise for the show, airing Wednesday nights on the FX network and replayed throughout the week, is that Santos has turned his life over to a televi- sion audience, which votes on his major decisions. In effect, he has turned over his free will to the combined wilt of America's TV viewing public. People with cell phones on ?mobile ser- vice can text -message vote on Santos' deci- sions about twice a day while the average viewer can either vote on-line or submit a random suggestion. Decisions are made such as whom to date (the blond or the brunette), who to room with his mother or his therapist) and how best to Cultivate his supposed musical talent (deliver singing telegrams or record with producer Bret Michaels). The show receives thousands of responses per week. Aging paperboy The circus will last another six weeks as Santos leads a parade of cameras and microphones wherever he goes, mostly throughout Hermosa Beach. What viewers know of Santos is this: at his current age of 30, he was a waiter at Michi's restaurant in Manhattan Beach with a dream of musical stardom, until the first week of filming, when viewers decid- ed he should quit his job, take up a paper Todd Santos removes unwanted hair on national television. Photo courtesy 7bdd TV route and pursue his dream. The appeal of the show may be that Santos represents a typical character in Hermosa Beach and throughout America. The shows producers peg him as a grazer, afraid of commitment with not much intel- lectual genius. 'There's a hundred guys around here just like him. A lot of slacken with no focus and no majo}job,' said Hermosa Beach res- ident Maggie Leibert, who now gets her daily newspaper delivered by Santos. The show's producers refused to make Santos available for an interview, saying that the new star is not media savvy. Rock star dreams While most of America can only laugh at Santos from a distance, the communica- tions major from Massachusetts is fairly well known locally, at popular Hermosa Beach bars. It didn't take long at a recent trip to Aloha Sharkeez on the Pier Plaza promenade to find someone who knew someone who knew Santos in college. Was he the type of guy who wanted to be on television? lb say the least,' said Hermosa Beach resident Sieve Ramos, the friend of Santo at Westfield State College in Massachusett '(bald always wanted to be a rock star.' The irony in all of television's reality based shows Is that as soon as camera appear following someone around, anothe reality takes place: that of pseudeeelebritt Whether or not Santos will become a: actual rock star is anyone's guess. Maw. former stars of reality TV shows find tha it's difficult to branch out into showbiz. 'I hope he's going to be okay. He's kin( of sensitive. I don't know what this is gain; to do to him,' Ramos said. Drawing so much attention locally may b. more than Santos bargained for. H, appeared to receive quite a heckling as hi left dateless from a Pier Plaza bar one nigh before the first 7bdd episode had even aired Hosted by George Cray, known for bein; the second host of The Weakest Link, 7bd, TV proclaims itself groundbreaking televi sion. The show comes with the standar, amount of crankiness and a few door slammed in the face of the camera crew. 'When you sign up for a reality TV shoe don't complain that the cameras are fo' lowing you around,' said Hermosan Mai >1 OVER 100 ADVERTISER COUPONS ONLINE AT WWW.EASYREADER.INFO/COUPONS 10 Patsy Reader January 29; 2004 Hermosa Beach About Town Fiesta Hermosa Booth space for this year's Memorial Day. weekend Fiesta Hermosa has become available this week, organic. ers said. Purveyors of handmade arts and crafts can rent 10 -foot square spaces for $540: ' Commercial sponsorships are available for S1,500 to 510,000. Space for food vendors is also avail- able. • 'Ib apply for a booth, artists must provide six photos of their work to the city at least four weeks prior to the fair, which takes place on the week- end of May 29. For more information call 376.0951. Union man retires Hermosan J. Travers Devine, a spearhead of the city's annual Saint Patrick's Day Parade, will retire this week from the California School. Employees Association, a union repre- senting more than 22,000 public employees. Devine has worked 18 years for the CSEA and dedicated his life to union staff work. He also was heavily involved with the California Democratic Party in the late. 60s to early 70s. He said that with his retirement, he plans to spend more time volunteering in the community. ER Police Beat Don't fight, prosecute 1Wo women got into an argument at Patrick Molloy's this weekend and one threw a haymaker, police said. The victim chose not to fight back, police said. Instead, she said she's pressing charges. Sleight of hand City may - save landmark ' lighthouse by David Rosenfeld In an unprecedented maneuver, the Hermosa Beach City Council moved to - save a historic Strand home known as the 'lighthouse.' By - enacting the city's Historic. Resource Preservation Ordnance, which was previously used only to preserve The Bijou theatre building, the council voted 4-1 Tuesday night to initiate the formal nomination of the lighthouse home as a historic resource. Never before has the Ordnance been used to preserve a resi- dence. • The move would delay demolition of the 75 -year-old landmark that was . expected in coming weeks. The owner's plans called for the home's tenants to move out this weekend. The council acted in dramatic fashion after the home's previous owner, Mary Zakary, showed photos and spoke of the . home's history. Later, City Attorney Michael Jenkins >33 Roommates gather in front of a landmark Hermosa home. The crew cele- brated the last party weekend at the lighthouse" on Saturday. Photo by David Rosenfeld Roman and Anne Pisir take to the air. Council tinkers with pier head and film permits by David Rosenfeld Architectural consultants for a project to renovate the city pier were given an additional 550,000 on Thesday to revise plans that led construction contractors to submit bids that were nearly 51 mil- lion over budget. Also at Thesday's city council meeting, the city slightly revised its film -permit policy and moved closer to keeping City Hall open five days a week. The city received only two bids for the project to revitalize the eastern end of the pier and put in a state-of-the-art life- guard facility. At 54.4 million, the lower bid was still nearly 51 million - about 25 percent - more than the city wants to spend. January 29, 2004 Easy Reader HB Lighthouse < 10 reviewed the preservation ordnance and the council moved to address the light- house issue, invoking an emergency clause in the state's open meeting law. The law allows the council to act on mat- ters not posted on its agenda if the matter came about after the agenda was publicly posted and it demands immediate atten- tion. 'If ever there was a case that fits this, it's this one; Jenkins said. Councilman Sam Edgerton, who was influential in creating the preservation ordnance to save the shell of the Bijou, cast the only dissenting vote in the deci- sion to save the lighthouse. . 'I have a real problem with preserving this house after it's already been sold,' Edgerton said. 'The owner should have done this when she owned it.' The council was scheduled to address the matter again at its next regular meet- ing Jan. 9, which will likely lead to a pub- lic hearing and possibly a court case. • Zakary, who lived in the home since 1976, said she sold her pride and joy with an informal agreement that the buyer, developer Michael Mulligan, would not tear if down. Mulligan has since sold the • house to developer William -Campbell for a reported $2.5 million. Neither Campbell nor Mulligan returned repeated phone calls seeking comment on the future of the house at First Street and the Strand, which is nick- named for its distinctive replica of a light- house turret that extends off the front" corner. Destruction planned Demolition of the house has already been approved by the California Coastal Commission, a required step in accor- ▪ dance with state law for any property within several hundred feet of the ocean. Before Thesday night's meeting, many . thought the demolition was a foregone conclusion, with nothing the city could do to ston it. ' 'It would be nice, but the cost is the real issue,' said City Manager Steven Burrell. Zakary said she kept to the tradition of renting out much of the house until she sold it about seven months ago to Mulligan, who then sold it about two months ago to Campbell. 'This house is not tear -down. I think it's going to bend the wrecking ball,' Zalcary said, referring to the home's thick plaster exterior and heart of redwood suppoi ting beams. A tour through the house revealed room for improvement, but Zakary and others said remodeling would be possi- ble. Some of the house's admirers would like to see it retrofitted while maintaining its outside complexion. Historyand.legend The home was built in the style of French Normandy, reportedly by a comp- troller for the U.S. Treasury Department in 1928 as a gift to his wife Miles of the abode abound. Once the tallest building is Hermosa "Beach, the house may have been used as an actual lighthouse to direct small airplanes in the 1930s. It is also said that during World War II it housed U.S. spies who perched from the master bedroom with binoculars, protectively surveying the entrance to the Redondo Beach harbor. The home reached legendary status when word spread of its famous guests. It reportedly hosted film stars Clark Gable and Carol Lombard on their honeymoon. Some say rock guitar icon Jimi Hendrix . may -have stayed in the house at least once. For some in the community, the destruction of the lighthouse would mark another sad loss of the city's older, charming homes. Some homes that once proudly displayed signs against such sell- outs are now being razed. Sad parting 'I'm sorry to see that one go,' John' Hales, a board member of the Hermosa Beach Historical Society and a resident >34 We guarantee your home In 90 we'll pay yo Nadra Real 1 RB/.' 310-37 Call us Propel * Property Conc • Staging WWW.Si 881 RE/Max Exe Redont tl C14:11 or 60,000 Circulation. c Best Rates in Town Guaranteed. c Don't get lost in the shuffle. lir Get results, instead! • Reach New Clients Call 372-4611 and a Easy Reader's Swat gatf C 34 Easy Reader PACIFIC CHRISTIAN CENTER "Touching Heaven... Changing Earth" • Sunday Services at 10:30 am With contemporary worship band, life application sermons, child care, and Sunday School for all ages • Special home groups and activities throughout the week • "Youth Alive" Wednesday nights at 7 pm - outstanding music and special activities for junior high and high school aged youth (Directed by Pastors Matt & Grace Kladnik) Pastors Jonathan and Diane Smith rind the entire PCC Family welcome you! Pacific Christian Center 1403 Pacific Ave. Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Tel: 310-545-8950 Web: www.pccmb.org CAS Professional Group, Inc. CAS Professional Group, Inc. offers Full Service Accounting, Bookkeeping, Payroll, Financial Planning, Employee Leasing, and Insurance Services. We prepare Income Taxes for Individuals, Corporations, Partnerships, Estatesfhusts, Sales Taxes, and HB Lighthouse <33 ' since 1947, said before the council's 'Ibesday night action. . 'Every time I walk past that house, I always stop and look at it. That was one of our very unique homes we had on the Strand. It's a sad thing to see something that 's been a classic in our community finally give way to the new high price - style mansion architecture that is real blah to me' - Campbell recently secured a $4,000 deposit from the home's current occu- pants, to safeguard against possible protest, occupants said. Plans call for the five roommates to move out by Feb. 1. In their place, they say, is planned an enor- January 29; 2004 mous home with modern architecture. The home's final residents held a 'burn- ing down the house' party Saturday evening with bands blaring in the living room. 'It's horrendous because this house has been an icon far so many years,' said resident Malt 'liens 'Even if I tell people what 16ve, they know it by the lighthnse • Roommate Todd Paavirud used to live on the third floor, which resembles an attic. The space is reached by scaling a set of narrow stairs that go straight up. From there, one can peek into the replica light- house turret or head to the roof by a rick- ety rope ladder. Paavirud said the house is haunted. 'There are things that are here, bro. There's some crazy stuff in that house, God's honest truth,' Paavirud said. ER Day Tripper <24 Harbor Boulevard to visit the S.S. Lane Victory. Along the way we'll pass a small park and memorial dedicated to the American Merchant Marines, the main mast, anchors and capstan from the decommissioned U.S.S Los Angeles, CA -135, and the Fishing Industry Memorial which reminds you that in 1892 San Pedro became the home of the first cannery in Los Angeles harbor. By 1935 as the Depression was ending, the canneries employed more than 6,000 workers. A wide bicycle path separates you from the traffic along Harbor Boulevard. The sights, sounds and smells remind us that this is one of the busiest harbors in the world. As we head north, we see the soaring Vincent Thomas Bridge carrying an unbroken line of tractor trailers high above us. Continue along Harbor to Swinford. 'loon right and follow the signs through the parking lot to the S.S..Lane Victory tied up at Berth 94. The ship was named after Isaac Lane, an African-American and former slave who became a bishop in the Methodist church and established Lane College in Tennessee A brochure published. by the U.S. Merchant Marine Veterans of World War have great views of the harbor and you'll see the 5 -inch 38, and the 20 and 40 -mil- limeter antiaircraft guns that were the sole armaments carried by the Victory ships. The Lane Victory will sail to Catalina and back six times this summer. Last year's trip included staged air and sub- marine attacks. Check out their website at www.victorylaneorg for more infor- mation. Retrace your steps to Harbor Boulevard. Here you'll be faced with a tough decision. You can either walk back to Sixth Street along Harbor Boulevard or if it's Friday -through -Monday, you can ride back to the Maritime Museum on a Pacific Electric Red Car utilizing a portion of the original right of way built by Phineas Banning in 1869. Tho of the Red Cars, No, 500 and No. 501, are replicas of cars originally built in the early 1900s. Car No. 1058 is a restored original. The fare is f 1. Plans call for the line to be continued through Ports 0' Call to Cabrillo Beach. . Leave the Red Car at the Maritime Museum station. Cross Harbor Boulevard and walk south to Seventh Street. Thm west on Seventh to continue your walk though historic San Pedro. At 327 W. Seventh St. you'll find the Whale and Ale, according to the menu the only 'authentic' English Pub in San • SOUTH BAY: Retireltreeze columnist Hannah Sampson ./A3 • www.dailybreeze.aom The South Bay's dioice for 110 years ,Ja1,.241, 2004( tZ P Hospital closure fears rise HEALTH: The looming sale of Tenet facilities, including three in the South Bay, adds to worry over loss of capacity. aLee Petioson and Gordon Smith COREY awISSae%F While Tbnet Healthcare pledged Wednes- day to take every possible step to and new miners to keep open Its 19 Southern Califor- nia hospitals up for sale, community leaden called for quick governmental action to ensure the medical centers aren't closed. Concem over sending the county's brewing medical -care capacity crisis Into a tailspin with the potential loss of the facilities — Including three In the South Bay— overrode what might have otherwise been health-care activists' pleasure at seeing the enigmatic hospital chain pull up stakes. 'Tbnet has just lobbed a big fat grenade Into the health-care system of Los Angeles County, said county Supervisor Zev Yam - slinky, who predicted that at least one-third of the 19 hospitals would be dosed for lack of a new comer stepping forward. • Tenet rocked In recent years by charges of massive overcharging at some of Its facilities, said It need, to sell the hospitals as part of a corporate restructuring. Fourteen of the 19 hospitals are In Los Angeles County. The main reason for selling these 19 hospitals Is the projected bill for bringing them up to earthquake safety standards: t1.6 billion. Tao are Daniel Freeman Memorial Hospi- tal InInglewood and Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital In Marina del Rey, which Tenet purchased for $55 million In December 2001 from the nonprofit Carondelet Health Sys- tem. Another is Centinela Hospital Medical Center in Inglewood. Tenet downplayed dire reports that I move to sell the hospitals would lead to th closures. 'We are very optimistic we'll and n owners, operators or sponsors of these facilities. These are good hospitals with gc medical staffs; said Dc Stephen Newco CEO of Thnet California. 'There are a nu ber of potential purchasers out there n have access to capital in ways that we do have access to capital. We believe almost of these hospitals will be turned over to n \j HOSPITALS4 Judge rules MB home can be sold COURTS: A class-action suit has been filed by 1,800 people over a contest In 2001 to give the house away. By bah Gromberg ednSdPetlur .: Coilyr j eldirce ,+� Wednesdaysu a saleo rejected .. a bid to halt the sale of ■ Man - batten Beach house that has become the subject of an ongo- bagcontroversy.. . - Judge Andrla Richey issued.. her decision without comment anddldnothearargumentsfrom alawyerrepresentingmore than 1,800 people in a class-action suit against Ben Waldrep, who . .. gave away the three-bedroom house in a contest but never delivered the prize. '1 was extremely surprised' . attorney David WI Brown said of the judge's riding. 'I don't know how long she reviewed the evidence. We are weighing our options. I'm going to talk with another attorney trying the case with me. We're trying to protectthe asset? Calls to Waldrep and his attorney were not returned Wednesday. Brown maintains that the house is not actually owned by Waldrep, but the man who HOUSE/A10 OVERTHE EDGE IN SAN PEDRO awMONVOSPEEM Own recover a stolen tar that appears to have been In a dernoaden derby at the bottom era cliff Sow Pam del Mr In San Pedro on Wednesday. The Volvo was toad a few days eager. The own Ws teams company paid for tie recovery, peeks seld adding that no rAdence was recovered. Allies urge Hahn to ac in LAX bid controversi .a GRAND JURY: Airport contracts continue to come under scnitiny') Some supporters say their backing f the mayor is being tested ,r,;• ;,i ly Devin Zahibr and Ian Gnit ot4...:„' Los city lobbyist �-how A Angeles lobbyist who w ■ wiretap In an Investigation of fort airport - Commissioner Leland We :appeared Wednesday_before_ the 'Cow ,r; Food Jury,.whle .aWes.of,Meyor Jen `.Hahn urged ;him .to takeonore force • %' .action truths'controversles eunound airport contractlng. • ,"1> ' ;, Davls,•a lobbyist for LAktun staid=operator W.H...Smlth;l;eppme 5; tipfonthe grand jury one day@Rerlths front wards, n -:1 bverseettth�e airort Mayor serBved w a he • relies lh'1Jahnh 2001 election ampalgr Appeaitogonq WB's 'Ask the May Hahn seldadiveids cooperated fully e the. grand fury(Th the cautioned that proceedings mey'not:Thad.to.a crlml prosecution. ' 'The fact that somebody's Investigat something doesn't mean that there's n essariiywrongdoing? Hahn said. The grand Jury Investigation is • latest development surrounding port contracts and the Board of Alrr • Commissioners, whose members appointed by Hahn. Earlier this mon Councilman Bernard Parks said he I - been approached by a half-dozen air! JURY/ S3 Daily Breeze THURSDAY January 29, 2004 SCANNING OUR CmES LOS ANGELES Pay raises OK'd for LAFD, paramedics The Los Angeles City Coun- cil on Wednesday approved a three -yeas 9 percent pay increase for firefighters and paramedics. and Mayor James Hahn is expected to give his approval Iasi week the council voted 13-1 In favor of the Increase, but because the vote was not =whims; a second vote was required. Councilman Bernard Parks, who cast the dissenting vote both limes, urged his colleagues m waft until the March election to see If the $15 billion bond measure passe; But Councilman Dennis Zino noted that police officers, other city employees and member of the Qty Council have received pay inaeases while firefighters and paramedics have not The overall package Is valued at $13 million this year and 543 million over the life of the contract. It calls for an Increase of 2 percent this yeas followed by raises of 3 percent and 4 per- cent, respectively, the following two years. EL SEGUNDO Base, developer to continue work The Los Angeles Alt Force Base and a private developer hired to renovate the aging mili- tary Instillation have signed a contract guaranteeing thatwork on a new Space and Missile Systems Center will continue as panned The SAMS Centel designed to house the satellite engineers who work on the base, by been under construction since November. But negotiations were ongoing,' even after the The developer has agreed to pay for the baa overhaul In exchange for land on which ID buildnewhome; The Los Angeles At Force Bax las long been rumored to be ■ lading contender for clo- sure In 2005, and the upgrades are seen as awsyto saveofthat possibility. South Bay Rep lane Farman lauded the signing. It is alncally Important to our nation's security, and It's essental that we have ■ modem base surrounded by the remark- able emarkable intellectual capital of the South Bay, she Said. —From staff reports Corrections A headline on Page All Wednesday about the sale of sane lad owned by the city of La;rdak korai referred to Gardens It was lawrdale oftgals who said that tri city wi reap tax benefits. Newsreleases SOTJTH BAY AND OTHER LOCAL NEWS Vote on port pollution funding is di SAN FEDROt Harbor commissioners request more information on expenditures for air quality measures. Mee Uttlefolm puteard Amid growing community concerns over port -related pollution, to Angeles harbor commissioners on Wednesday called for more documentation In the port's budget on exactly how much money Is being spent on altqualitymeasures. The request came aa commissioners postponed voting on ■ recommendation by a dtlzens panel to set aside at least 10 per- cent of the port's budget for air quality con- trol measures. 'The community Is reaching (the point of) outage, said Richard Havenlck, chair- man of the at quality subcommittee of the Port Community Advisory Comminee, which made the recommendation. 'Please, address the decline in air quality. After 2x5 years on the PCAC, I do believe this Is the No.1 issue. We have to do something bigger than what we've done In the past.' Residents hi San Pedro and Wilmington have long complained that as the port's container business has grown, so have neg- ative Industrial impacts on Its surrounding neighborhoods. Port officials point to numerous envi- ronmental program; but because they are often included under specific budget proJ - ectsand an amou 'We re Appy, di ment for up and n Harbo on the a informal how mu• saaoswassasaxss�6 A hams at 100 ria Strad In'Her .? BBads blown for,hs t stM dro 4nhegi sea toxar ws sdw8id to M read Smyty >fJ i .1 i, . City landmark saved for now HERMOSA BEAOt Council stops demolition ora home on The Strand while it considers designating it a historic dwelling. By Dent Jonson ear ledd Looking to stop the demolition of one of the city's unique oceanfront home; the 'Hermosa Beach City Council has taken the step of nominating the house at 100 The Strand for hlstortc protecrion without the property owner's consent. The three-story French Normandy - style home, a landmark because of Its distinctive lighthouse tower was scheduled to be razed Sunday to make way fora S4.5 million Italian villa that Is already being advertised do a local real estate agent's Web site. Local residents and a previous owner alerted the City Council on Thesday night to the 76 -year-old home's plight, eking B the city's historic preservation laws could be used to determine the building's cultural and historic value. • The emergency action taken by the council is expected to Ignite a controversy over the often opposing viewpoints of property rights and his- toric preservation, thrusting the city in the middle of South Bay campaigns to preserve the past Adding to the potential for contro- versy, the property's current owner Redondo Beach resident and devel- oper William Campbell, was not at the meeting when the council voted 4.1 to IANDMABXJAI1 `Fein chn seni the OBTTUAR1 everything) , before her d By Larry Albs MIMIC Retired Do son,whosew life attracted died Shewaz The lbrrar Jan. 9, died p Pamir Draw May badwsysew the I¢Nma fan atm It bane at The Strad has mads k a bitwiadaul landmark ad she belews Haman Beech Adak fined dedyste It a historic Sag to use A ban detdtt Brooklyn, N: eighth grade. 63, reviewed became este her trials anc Bay from 19E Hannah: readers who Hp Benfield edited many 'She rete mall, perha personal ant writer whose missed.' Readers re recipe for at 1n1940, Se aaosstheco • • Cff LANDMARK:: CoutiOil*ked 0.. save -home FROM PAGE A3 consider the house for a historic designation. The vote makes It the first private residence to be nominated for protection, and the second building since the city passed the law in 1997 as a way to pro- tect the downtown Bijou Theater building. Campbell did not return messages seeking com- ment In casting the onlyopposingvote, CttyCouncilman Sam Edgerton said he couldn't support the move unless the property owner was willing to preserve the home, a view that was partially supported by his colleagues who said they still felt the structure was important enough to the city to warrant an investiga- tion. Councilman admits reluctance "I'm not wedded to the idea that we're going to preserve this, but if at any point we have a building that has potential significance to our city, It should give anybody pause, CttyCouncilmanArtYoonsaid. "1 think we have to look at it not only from the emo- tional standpoint, but we have to look at it from the fairness standpoint" With the councll's action Tuesday, all demolition and construction permits were put on hold until the city can conduct a public hearing — with Campbell present — to determine whether to proceed with seeking the historic designation. The meeting Is scheduled for Feb. 10. Although property rights — and all that they entail — of the owner tttust be considered, the city also must look at the intangibles of culture and history, Yoon said. The house on The Strand's southem end Is easily recognized by anybody who has traveled the city's bike end pedestrian path. Built in 1928 by contractor G.H. Gauling for J.H. Brinkman, the building is believed to be the second house built In the area. It has changed owners ontya handful of times. Cttypropertyrecordsshowthe five-bedroomhome was owned by Margaret McGuire in 1961, Raymond Miller In 1970, Dr. Gordon S. Goei after that, and then byMary Zachary and her family,who stayed there for 26 years before selling it tolocaldeveloper MikeMul- ligan in 2002. Mulllgansoldthe house the nextyear to Campbell for S2.4 million.. It was Zachary, her friends and some former neighbors who brought the home's demolition to the council's attention. 6i: My mistake is that I did not think that anybody would ever want to tear it down completely. — MARY ZACHARY, fanner owner of French Normandy -style house in Hermosa Beach The former Redondo Union High School English teacher said she never thought about seeking his- toric status protection for the home while she owned It because Mw didn't want to burden future owners who mightwantto make changes. "My mistake is that I did not think that anybody would ever want to tear it down completely," Zachary said. House has international renown In her years living there, Zachary said the home received countless compliments from passersby. She even met people overseas who knew of Hermosa Beach and the "lighthouse house, "Where else could you live and have your house remembered as if it were an icon? she said. Zachary said that when she sold it to Mulligan, he told her he and his family were going to live there. In.October, 'theCalifomla Coastal Commission granted Mu1lI i and Joseph Schwartz permission to demolish the house and construct a new one. While he supports looking into the historic sig- nificance of 100 The Strand, City Councilman Peter Tucker said he hopes the actions don't open the city up to a lawsuit if anything, the process will raise awareness about the city's historic preservation law, Tucker said. "It'll be interesting to see what we can and can't do; he said. To be honest ... I can't tell a guy what to do with his property. "If we can save It and the owner's willing, that would be great.' Staff librarian Sam enern contributed to this artide. sec . LOCAL NEWS: RB's Super Bowl run is a `tune-up' for police, firefighters./A3 Sour-. Jas. 3J WZ"o Y PI rt • www.daifybreeze.com The South Bay's choice for 110 years State attorney general to sue 3 grocery chains ANTITRUST. Lockyerwlill ask court to bar a pact he says violates federal law and raises prices during labor dispute. By Ala Vaipa MwsoWm eta • The state Attorney General's Office said Friday it will sue the eupermahes chains Involved In a months -long labor dispute with Southern California grocery workers nen week on grounds dust their mutual -old pact violates antitrust laws. 'This action Is about protecting shoppers egalnat unlawful, anticompetitive conduct that keeps prices artificially high' Attorney General Bill Lodger weld In a statement Fri- day. 'The grocers' agreement to share costs and revenue hurts consumers by discourag- ing competitive pricing. The antitrust law airs to prevent that, and l Intend to enforce the law.' Lockyer's office Initially announced Friday it had already Bled the federal lawsuit In Las SMfWAY'S ao FEELING F'RINSURC A18l lief lades say SYx Buds zlie is berg eeoiae b lea.' and that nth win b srp Angeles, but a 'last-minute glitch' In the paperwork caused 1t to miss the Dung dead- line, saidspokeemanTbm Dressler The suit 1a expected to be filed Monday against Albertson Inc., Safeway Inc, welch owns the Voss and Pavillon chains, and two chains run by Ringer Co. — Ralph* Grocery Co. and Food 4 Lau Food Co. All the / are In the pact, but Food 4 Less work( not Involved In the labor dispute. Lockyer contends the companies' an meat which they made several week/ to entering conecdve bargaining with grocery employees, violates federal an laws, particularly the Sherman AR me suit will seek a court order bard companies from profit-sharing and der the arrangement WegaL LAWS, Jenny Mass above, do sna n at attorney John Barnett after a les Angeles Superior Court key dead- ., locked Friday In It second trW on dwgus M used exmnM fn b wetting a tent following a traffic stop In 2002. M naso photographer videotaped the '1 rest District Attorney Sava Cooly/ k not -meted to authato a did 01.4. At dr, bland redden taxa can after lin dadiodt was a mea &Sons omnNty afNkts, noting Ohm were sh only two black fu m Ms Aar different standards of pace faid black defendants Donovan Jadfa, ths teen Mase wan maned of slnmig against a car In a service satkn pnldkg lo, k blade. Month k Silts. uwawrmwhav arm COURTS: Ex-inglew000fficer again ain c face charges of excessive force against a teenager or be freed after 6-6 deadlock yDrbara ) t awrtssa k1 :!4:... M1. i�h tl 4M11 .,0 Itweslikeea-month-oldretunPrldey `Xatthe sive tone retrial of formeringlewdod pollee JeremyMorse when a second Jury annobr could not reach • verdict and the Judge da mmriaL Asked by Los Angeles Superior Court Jud nam Holnngev Orth if there was any chance discussion would break the 6-6 deadlock 1 foreman responded: 'I think there's no whatsoever' The foreman informed Hollingsworth on day afternoon that Jurors were deadlocked charge of assault by a pace officer under tl of authority, but the Judge risked them to o deliberating Friday. Alter about an hour t discussion. they still could not reach a una decwon. Tbeydeliberated about two days b Like the lint trlal, which ended in Julywi split In favor of gull, the hung Jury was n anger by a handful of community activists v Morse wasn't convicted of assaultingblackt Donovan Jackson because Justice is difi'e MO 11gq-IoaDa, - Mars rover sees . Worthless house or historic HB treasur f *rem Moue shwa, rl{+d, smiles at attorney John matt after a Ire Angela Senator Coat Jury dead- locked Friday In his second bid an drops he used sus s fora In rraitlr , a teen faaovhg a traffic .. h 2002 M anal photogadw Odaoupd tae rest District Atony Stam Co oleyevictedt evicted autlrabe a titled trial At richt resldms age tan after the deadlock wet anpoweed Some enmity advises, noting thea were Way two black members, said Mass beta?td from a system tat as differed stetdais ofJustice for Neste and blah defended'. Donovan M sa% the tam Mom vers raised of slamming against a lir In a service station pricing la, B bulk. Mom B white MAD mAveeanarasm teenager or be freed after a 6-6 deadlock. By Denise Mx ouYC !twee like a 6 -month-old ream Fridayat the aces - sive force retrial of former Inglewood police officer Jeremy Morse when a second Jury announced It could not reach a verdict and the Judge declared a mIsbtaL Asked by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Wil- liams Hollingsworth Ifthere was any chance further discussion would break the 6-8 deadlock the Jury foreman responded: eI think there's no chance whatsoever' The foreman Informed Hollingewotth on Thurs- day afternoon that Jurors were deadlocked on the charge of assault by a peace o®cer under the color of authority, but the Judge asked them to continue deliberating Friday. After about an hour of more discussion, they still could not reach a unanimous decision. They deliberated about two days In all. Like the gni Mel, which ended In July with a 7-5 split In favor of guilt, the hung Jury was met with angerbya handful of community activistswho said Morse wasg't convicted of asseulting black teenager Donovan Jackson because Justice Is different for MORSEJA14 rover sees s of mineral ver often to l in water fridges ser ler* rover Opportunity 'pled y of a mineral that typically ter — a finding that could mean dusty red planet was once wet- ebaplubiemlife. e question Opportunity and Its were sent to answer urinary discovery came hours eorlunity was to roll Its els o the mentor surface for the aglneers planned to commend roll the 10 feet oflts lander and it 12:12 a.m. today. Confirms - meted three hours later, Id the 5620 million double- Isdon should begin in earnest MARLAlO Worthless house or historic HB treasure? THE STRAND: Owner ofavintage home who wants to build a villa is surprised the city halted demolition. By DerM Johnsen Jur sen When the Hermosa Beech City Council • stepped In to Nave the home at 100 The Strand from Imminent destruction, It Jumped headfirst Into a long-standing con- flict pitting property rights against historic preservation: When this has happened before In the South Bay, history has usually ended up losing because property owner, unless they went the old preserved, often opt to cash In on their land's value. But this time could be different for two reasons: a city has Inserted Itself Into a battle usually fought between preserva- tion groups and developers, and Hermosa Beach b wielding a preservation ordinance backed by a healthy number of legal dect- dons—In partictdarfromtheU.S. Supreme Court. Whatever the outcome, the Issue Is aura to be defined by distinctly opposing views, moneyva heritage, prontve historical aes- thetic, change vs. conservation. The owner of 100 The Strand certainly knowewhere he stands. 'I've been riding my bike on that Strand for 20 years and I hadn't ever nodced that house unto Mike Mulligan said he had It up HISTORIUAIS Call for Iraq intelligence investigation a problem for Bush By Tana Had M MOORED PFn WASHINGTON — A full-blown Investi- gation of Iraq Intelligence failures would pose election-yearAtkafor President Hugh. No one could be certain where It would lead, who It would touch or what It would uncover But resbtlng an inwstlgetlon has has - ands, too, because that would give Demo- catic presidental rivals an opening to keep the Issue dive and questonwhetthe White House might be hiding. A blpartlean proposal for an Independent investigation is blouoming into a promi- nent Issue on the presidential campaign Iran and on Capitol Hill. The issue moved to the fore when former chief U.S. weep - Analysis ons Inspector David Pay said he believed Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction and Bush's decision to go to war was based on Inaccurate intelligence. For now, the White House appears to be BUSWAIO • a l• flt,i um: JUI11C argue neniiosa 15 !UJ111g 1LS Cll ltMlAC!j UL11Clb bay %MIMClb 11%11W come 1JL MU yea At for sale; said Wiliam Campbell. who purchased the property in September for *2.4 million. 'You look at the design and 113 not even French Normandy._ the construc- tion Ispoor. 'distend value only. The hate la worthies' The Redondo Beach resident and developer admittedly has no love for the 76 -year-old home and said the city, by nominating the house for historic preservation, b setting Itself up fora fall byblock- Ing him from tearing down the home to buid a *43 million Italian villathat'sabeadybeingadvertlaed for sale. At this point, with permit costs and the construction loan. Camp- bell said he's already into the prop- erty for about *211.000 • month. a price tag lima will continue regrow every day the house is standing after i is stalled demolition dm on Monday. ' Add thla m the price he paid for the hone and Campbell said the citybetter be prepared to pay hlm kdecidampmsuethehbmrtedes- igatloc for the tveeetory home with m landmark lighthouse 1 don't know Brm shoded (or angry); he aid. 'Why would the d t3 wont to lose so much m on ey in 'lawsuit they're going to beer Campbell said he also questions the motives of the home's owner twice removed, Mary Zachary, who sold the house to MuWgm for S23mmion in 2002. It was Zach- ary, her friends and family who brought the home's plight to the mune it mention Tuesday. Since then, the town nus been aim abed the loos d the light - house' horse that eurybody knows. but Campbell wants to know why, If Zadbery Is a enam- ored with the hale she didn't qualify it a an histone landmark whtleaM sten owned It 'The have b not appealing' he 2 said lt4 ody appealing to het' . Asir the cry lumping into the fay, he questions why officials have no. made an attempt to get historic protection far any other of ib old beach cottages and homes 1f the dry really cares about these old homes — Ind of having this ordinance they should mesa • Bat now and put these houses mthispeahen a developer comes alone the properties will be Bagged, he rid 1 would have. never purchased k ifl would have - steak medal % A public hearing ld-.. Pete 10 will dedde the b d(ihea house Until Bata, -any building Michael Jenkins said the case for the dry is fairly strong should it dedde to seek historic sons for the house, a designation that mays what an and can't be done to the Property. 'There's • substantial amount of case law coming from the U.S. Supreme Court uphdding the right of public .gender to desig- nate properties asbeing cultural or historic resources based on the fad they have either historic signifi- cance, architectural significance or some other cultural ngnlgonce,' Jenkins said. Jenkins dted the landmark 1978 Penn Central case in which the Supreme Coun sided with Few York Cm/s Landmarks Prese tion Committee in opposing • plan to build • 53soby office tower amp Gond Central Terminal The case established an tmpartant precedent In historic preservation Saute .me axes basically allow dies to prom buildings as long as some economic use an he made of the building' he eald.'Um odl- mnce Is on very firm legal gourd. 'The only real base b whether or sad fids building meets the al- tette n,bet of the ordinance or not. het because It's old is not enough Age is one possible criteria but It has tobe combined with otherf More Importantly; Jenkins said the dtyhas no finandal obligation to the Iandownee an opinion that hkelydoem'ttltwell=Campbell's *2.4 million mortgage documents While the final dedsbn will come down to the coundl's will and the hbmriai relevancy tithe house thea are many people In town who feel the situation b a Li The only real issue is whether or not this building meets the criteria of the ordinance or not. a.. Age is one possible criteria, but it has to be combined with others. !! —MIaSi JFHJaa, br .a. s heti tip many watershed moment In the drive to preserve the dryh rapidly dlap- Pliel Citing awtbtic from Qty Man- ager Steve Burrell that In the past five years more tun 1,000 new homes have been bulk in Hermosa BeachresidentkliDudossaid:ln five ran, 1,000 homes can change the complehdm of the dty. I think you make astandwhenyou haven and 1 mink were at the 'enough is enough' KM& people would ay this is a bold step others world ay Ks about time said Dudes a 25 -year resident. 1 think anybody who's spent any number of years in this community would fel the same" Dodos said he believes [lathy Is missing a sense of balance, where both the needs of developers and the wants of its ddtens are met In a dry where only the wealthy will soon be able to buy property, it's edging toward a situation pitting the haver against the have -nota he said. Ms Is a drastic change for a laid-back beach town that, until recently, edll lazed in the shadows of itsounter-culture past. If you disenfmnddse the middle class and retired people... that character gets changed com- pletely,'heald He point, out • section of the dtyvs General Pim that urges future generations to preserve the homes bulk in the 19305 and 1940s, and entourages Incentives tothose willing to mal nom and rehabilitate these architectural natures. 'Thee needs to be an aggressive stand made Dude said the good part ofthis is _ this particular cue has put this hue In the public baro In the drive toward preserva- tion. Ks the beach titles that have seen the most action oar the past deade — from the mint green Craftsman on The Esplanade hi Redondo Bach that eventu- ally fell before the bulldozers to the countless small bungalows that are regularly scraped from lob in ManhatanBeach. Even in Torrance. the results of anfailedeffort to save an old down- town movie theater are evident in the condominiums that now inhabit the lot where the former Pussycat'Dnater once stood. Aa it iswith most of these batter developers and preservadonim dashed over the intrinsic value of each structure Redondo Beach resident Ann Baker looks at these challenges from a unique prospective and. while she lives in a 10D -plus -yeas old house la one of the city's his- toric districts, she fides squarely with thepropertyownen. Baker's parents owned several homes on Gertrude Avenue and Carnelian Street that were listed as historic landmarks without their approval. In fact, she didn't even know their ram. until her nephew sold the house and the buyer backed out after earning of the homes historic designation. 'WThenyoi sebemthrwglnsome- tltmg Ile that, you really respect property owner( r Baker said 'When someone she has it much money hated in my property as I do tlsmtheysin haveaseyamr When it comes to the dty of Hermosa Beat laying any kind of claim to Campbell's oceanfront home, Baler said she didn't think h wee fair for the dry to hold him up. 1 think everybodyb emtled to do what thrysram with their own prop - ate she said If he wants to build it and the In it Small they should just hen they shouldluatbuyhfrsalonemnm 'I love old houses. but I drink people's Eight. come before any- thing else" With many old homes left in the dty, the Issue is not going to go away anytime soon, and with same residents talking about put- ting together a register of possible historic homes, Ws likely to stay Just avolatile. a musw, there am those ran . occasi here historic presava- td and property rights bappdy -. m-existinthesmoe place—eseo the multimillioadollar homes tilts line the city's beach -(root path. Fora long whlle, Hermosa Beach residents Shawn and Susan Darcy walked by the decrepit old manse et Fifth Street and The Strand, admiring It's unique shape and antiquated design. not knowing the home was tied to the Avila family, a ranching darn with links to the South Bayve original Spanish landowners Then came the chance to buy It r at auction, and after beating out developers and real estate dealers, the Partys landed the house. Using a windfall from high-tech stock., the couple spent three ye [ renovations It was a real labcc d h` DaseysaidRidayahemom' Wejua low the way the house looks nom- ' pared m what we could have built here ltwouldjustbeabigloce Since undertaking the task, Mc Dacy said he's received comtler compliment' from people saying how happy they are that he saved the have Fel even had visits from family member who used to live in the have, giving them i. tout d the completely revamped stnncnue while they sham stories about its past 'We're really happy with the '.`. 6wse, old Me Darcy. adding gut `. hemdhbfarlyplmmhveinefor- eves 'eveslthajuagdaltdchaacte 'Aa gamamtdaauc character. 'Alta alsold and done, end! '. badto dohall over agaln,lwsrddn't havedoneanythingdifierendy.' • • • Th'#' EICII I0RTFI The Community Newspaper of The Beach Cities Manhattan Beach • Hermosa Beach • Redondo Beach • El Segundo Jan. 29 • Feb. 4, 2004 (310) 372-0388, www.tbrnews.eoin Volume 27 Number 51 The Manhattan Beach.': ' CYeatlro., Aria �Cmtae; nhf'> bnte; thrones i withtont?' artists hielogbag Madludau Baal Coundlyuu ;Stan ,N.yout.mo. ,� lily:?r*^+t (•.,; ire -too. A:r i rtsCcglt ,.�fr[.i4 The above Manhattan Beach house Is now for sale by the owner, who offered It as a prize In an any contest In 2001. (pia'. by CML Miller)) Home contest house up for sale ■ Manhattan Beach home offered in contest is put up for sale by its original owner. Lawyers for class-action lawsuit file for protective order to prevent sale. .by Cindy Yoahlyama Stared the contest, said he was filing a protective order Wednesday to say and atop the sale of the house. 9 think its pretty audacious to put it up for sale when he told people he was going to lease it out," Brown said. As of Tuesday morning, ReMax Beach Cities Realtor Dana Milo confirmed the house A man who claimed he gave away his Manhattan Bach house In • 2001 essay contest this week reportedly put his house on the me: - kat for $I.1 million. David Brown, a lawyer with Huskinson and Brown, who Is representing more that 1.750 plaintiffs In • class-action suit against the homeowner, Ben Waldrep, and the couple who admin - MANHATTAN BEACH Council considers saving home ■ The former owner of a 1928 Strand home asks the council to designate It a historic building In order to save it from demolition. by Whitney Youngs Although not listed as an Item of discussion on the agenda. the Hermosa Bach City Council Tom day night agreed to nomi- nate the house at 100 The Strand for a possible designation as a historic land- mark 10 save 11 from scheduled demolition In early February. The vote was 4l- • The council agreed to nominate the structure that it will review to as if it can possibly designate it as a historic landmark at iu nut meeting. The majority of Council members expressed concern and voted to nominate 1110 house l0 save it from being destroyed before It had time to act on the matter at its next meeting. City Manager Steve Burrell, the eiry's Building Department and one of the previous Damen of the home reviewed the his- tory of the house and flied the appropriate paperwork (Please awn to Page 22) HERMOSA BEACH (Please mm to Page 3 School Board cuts felt in schools' music program by Dawnya Pring cut," said Roane Fields, who gave heir resignation at the podium after board members made their decision. The vole was 4-1, with board member Carl Clark voting no. Fields has taught kindergarten through third-grade music at (Please tuns to Page 4) Despite • board room full of protestors, Redondo Beach School Board membete=- voted to cut the hours of eight district music teachers, causing one to resign on the spa. • "1 cannot adequately prepare for class If my prep time Is being REDONDO BEACH ...Spring Weddings, Page 37...South Bay Homes for sale, Page 72 .-. The former homeowner of the above house 4 trying to enlist the City Council's help In saving It from demolition. Council considers fate of house (Continued from cover) Wednesday morning. but u of press tim The Beach Reporter had no additional infor- IETING7_ AINED IT BACK? ON YOUR DIET? matlon on the fate of the home that was built in 1928. The City Council, in effect, will ratify its action at Its next meeting scheduled for Feb. 9, when the new properly owner, William Campbell, will have the opportunity to speak on the behalf of the new purchase. According to City Attorney Mike Jenkins, the Brown Act prohibits the City Council from acting on items not listed on the agenda, with the exception of matter that come before the five elected officials after the posting of the agenda and are in need of Immediate action. According to the city's historic preser- vation resources order, the code allows a nomination to be made of any building In the city to become a historic resource to be made either by the property owner or the city," Bald Jenkina. "The code also states once a nomination has been requested for designation ofa historic landmark then no demolition, building or any other permit shall be issued until • final determination has been made regarding the proposed des. ignation. What that basically means is that if the city were to Initiate a nomination in this instance, then we would oat of necessity, re- voke any outstanding demolition or building permit of this property pending the review of the designation. You don't have enough Information in front of you tonight to make any determination as to whether this prop- erty mats the criteria of a historic designation." (Moue turn to Page 25) • Council considers fate of house (Continued from Page 22) Some items of the criteria for u historic designation pertain to the age of the struc- ture, its association with significant historic events or people, whether it embodies dis- tinctive architectural style or if it's a work of a notable architect or designer. Mary Zachary. owner of the house for 26 years. informed the council of the mailer Tuesday night. She sold the house about a year and a half ago to developer Mike Mulligan who later sold the proper) to an- other developer, William Campbell. "I'm urging the city to review the cul- tural value of this beautiful house to the city;" said Zachary. "It is the first house you see on The Strand when driving nosh in Hermosa from Herondo. Hermosa Beach would suffer a great Toss if we let one of the lase of the charming older homes slip through our fingers" According to Zachary, the house is made out of redwood and its architecture is in- spired by French Normandy designs. Famed actor Clark Cable and his new bride, Carol Lombard, spent their lint honeymoon 1t the house. In the 1930s, it served as a function- ally operational lighthouse and in the 1940s, it was used as u spy house with telescopes located on the channel. The Discovery Channel used the house for its documentary on the tsunami in the 1990s. Hermosa Beach has an ordinance in place that protects historic structures from demolition once nominated and then desig- nated under local law. The historic Bijou Theater that was built in 1923 is proteced under such an ordinance. "1 will vote to see if we can save this • house. but I'm just hoping we don't open ourselves up to a lawsuit with this devel- oper" said City Councilman Peter Tucker. 'The misinformation that some people are hearing is that the city would rather sec these old homes come down and as a city official I'm not too happy about this. As u former Planning Commissioner, who spent 10 years with the commission, we never said to a developer. 'Go ahead and tear down a house.' Instead we usually approved variances so people could fix up older houses" City Councilman Sam Edgerton, who is the owner of a historic house built in 1906, was the lone dissenter on (he matter because he fell it was unfair to nominate the struc- ture when the current owner was not present to speak on the issue. "When we initialed (his ordinance, the Thought was that if someone wanted to des- ignate their home as a historical house then they could do that," said Edgerton. "1 don't know what the house sold fur. it might have been well more than a million dollars. and the guy who bought this house is going to find out tomorrow that what he bought is not what he bargained for, and so on an ethical level, 1 have a little bit of a problem with that. It's a lovely house and I'm sure there are very fond memories (here, but, really, if one wanted to preserve this house, and pre- vent this house from ever being tom down, they should have done it when they were the owner" • • Gi No other structure says 'HERMOSA' like this one write your CITY COUNCIL today to voice your opinion... afr • 1 our: ci r. boatib sniffer" 'GREATlOWT: i:OO the STRAN co. s ,# .,:.gra HERMOSA BEACH ICON �192W Bulit by t•he U.$ 1rEasury Department Cpntrolter, In the French Normandti style. Cot hui ed�f �bfiid ',termite resistant AMERtCdN REDWOOD TIMBERS and sound, plaster and'c icken wire' lath s t .roving UGHThouse id`atid Carol Lor find fi honeymoon cottage "� ` "� c i4. I+vy"U i �' • • B-t„ry-°^' February 2, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council February 10, 2004 ;ADA/ SUBJECT: HEARING REGARDING NUISANCE ABATEMENT OF PROPERTY AT 24 8t STREET PROPERTY OWNER: GEORGE VAN DORN Recommendation: Direct as deemed appropriate. Background: On January 13, 2003 the City Council set a public hearing to consider abatement actions for the subject property. It was previously reported that over the years, the house, built in 1921, has been the subject of a number of enforcement actions. On January 27, 2004, staff spoke with the property owner, who indicated the property is now in a 45 -day escrow and is requesting that the City defer its abatement action for 120 days so that the sale can be completed. (See attached letter from Mr. Van Dorn). Staff has asked for a copy of the escrow papers to confirm the sale. These documents were not yet available as of the staff report deadline. The following provides a chronology of code enforcement activity regarding the property: 1. The Community Development Department's property file contains correction notices on the property from 1968, 1969, 1977, and 1985. The letters from 1985 indicate that the building was in disrepair at that time, including leaky roof, holes in wood floors, broken and missing windows, and handrail and stairway in an unsafe condition. 2. A discussion with Michael Flaherty, Supervisor, Public Works Department, revealed that the home has been boarded up at least three times in the past three years. The property owner did not respond to previous requests to correct deficiencies. 3. Recent code enforcement efforts include a letter, dated March 4, 2002, sent to the owner, Mr. George Van Dorn. The letter was sent in response to neighborhood complaints that the exterior stairway and landing were unstable and that the house was a nuisance. A few weeks after the letter was sent, the City Public Works Department boarded up the house and secured the stairway. As the property had been secured, no further code enforcement was pursued. 4. On December 18, 2003, staff issued a letter to the owner requesting that he take steps to correct the nuisance -related problems, as the matter will be considered for nuisance abatement by the City Council. 5. On January 5, 2004, staff called the owner to inquire what steps would be taken to correct the nuisance problems. The owner indicated that he is will to install fencing on the north and south sides of the property (walk street and alley respectively), but that he feels the owners to the east and west should be responsible for constructing their own fencing which will effectively secure the site. 6. On January 13, the City Council set a hearing for February 10 to consider formal abatement action. 5b • • The following pictures, taken in October 2003, illustrate the condition of the property: View from 8th Street (walk street) Views from 8th Court (alley) 2 The City Prosecutor has recommended using the procedures outlined in Chapter 8.28 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to address such nuisance abatement issues. The steps involved are: 1. Precise identification of violations and solutions. 2. Setting the matter for public hearing by the City Council. 3. Conducting the hearing, consideration of evidence submitted and decision by Council. 4. Implementation of the Council decision, e.g. demolition and clearing of the site. 5. Recovery of City costs to abate the nuisance (including all staff time and out-of-pocket expenses.) We are presently at Step 3 of the process, the hearing to consider evidence submitted followed by a decision by the City Council. Council is therefore being asked to conduct the public hearing and consider all relevant evidence, including testimony from owners and other interested parties and staff reports. Upon the conclusion of the hearing, the Council may determine whether the premises constitute a nuisance or it may determine that additional investigation is required (e.g. that an interior inspection is required to make a final determination). If the Council determines that a nuisance exists, it may order the nuisance abated within a reasonable time. In such case, it will adopt a Resolution of Abatement containing the findings of the Council upon which such determination of nuisance is based, ordering the abatement of the nuisance, describing the needed corrections and/or repair necessary to abate the nuisance, and specifying the time within which the nuisance is to be abated. Alternately, the Council may decide to defer taking further action pending the outcome of the sale of the subject property. The City Attorney has advised that the City cannot itself demolish the structure simply because it is an eyesore. There must be evidence that it is a threat to the public or to public property (e.g. it presents the danger of imminent collapse.) However, if the property is not an imminent threat to public safety but simply an eyesore, the City can order it secured and cleaned up under the abatement procedures of Chapter 8.28 and then recover associated costs. Analysis: The provisions of Chapter 8.28, pertaining to property causing "damage to the use or enjoyment of property" or "detrimental to the property of others", are especially relevant to the property in question.' In addition, a separate chapter of the Municipal Code establishes that any violation of the Code as a public nuisance may be summarily abated.' From an exterior inspection of the property, staff has identified the following conditions: 1. The property has been left in disrepair for several years. 2. The exterior stairway and landing have been damaged and are unsafe. 3. Property is regularly trashed and vandalized 4. Property is not properly fenced or secured from intruders 5. The building's paint is peeling and deteriorated 6. The building's wood sheathing is deteriorated 7. Property is overgrown with untended vegetation and weeds 8. The structure on the property is an eyesore 9. Greater than 75% of the building is in need of repair. The property owner contends that the property is not in major disrepair and disputes the above description of the property. He also contends that any problems will be cured with the sale and 3 subsequent redevelopment of the property. An interior inspection of the property would be required to determine the full extent of the problems identified and whether there are additional deficiencies. If the City Council decides to proceed with nuisance abatement, an inspection warrant may be required to gain access to the property to make such an inspection. Based on the above observations, documented in the included photos, the property may constitute a nuisance. Specifically, this is because: 1. The property contains a structure, the house, which is unsightly by reason of its condition and therefore detrimental to the property of others (8.28.28.020B4). 2. The condition of the property, its unsightliness and its attraction to vandals and intruders, interferes with neighbors' enjoyment of their properties (8.28.28.020B3). If the City Council determines that a nuisance exists on the property, it must adopt a resolution finding the property to be a nuisance and containing an abatement schedule. A draft Resolution of Abatement is attached. The resolution requires that abatement actions may consist of either of the following at the option of the property owner: A. Extensive repairs and rehabilitation of the house to correct all of the above-specified nuisance conditions and all Building Code and other code violations, both interior and exterior; or B. Demolition of the house. The abatement schedule requires submission of a list of repairs or declaration of intent to demolish by March 10. Repairs or demolition shall then be completed within 120 days after approval by the Community Development Director of the foregoing list of repairs and issuance of a building permit, or within 120 days after issuance of a demolition permit.; Upon expiration of the time specified for abatement, Section 8.28.070F provides for the City Attorney to notify the owner of the affected premises by registered or certified mail of such expiration, and inform the owner that abatement must be completed or a further appeal made to the City Council within ten days from the date of mailing. In addition to the above action, the City Council may also direct the City Attorney to commence a civil action to abate the nuisance or a civil action in conjunction with abatement proceedings, or to proceed with a criminal action against the owner (8.28.110). Consistent with those provisions, the attached resolution provides that if the abatement period expires with no further appeal in response to the above City Attorney's notification and if the Community Development Director determines that the owner is not making a good faith effort to comply with the order of abatement, the Director shall schedule the issue for further City Council review to determine if civil or criminal action should be initiated. { 4 4• : lumenfel • Community D elopment Department ctor Concur: Steph»• ' . Burrell City Manager Attachments: I. Resolution of Abatement 2. Correspondence Notes: 1. "The following are expressly declared to be nuisances, and any person maintaining or permitting such nuisances or any of them to be maintained or to exist on his premises whether as owner, lessee or otherwise, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable as hereinafter provided and each and every day in which the nuisance shall be permitted to be continued shall constitute a separate offense: (8.28.28.020) "...3. Actions Damaging the Use or Enjoyment of Property. Harboring or permitting any premises or permitting individuals or groups using or visiting such premises in a manner which adversely affects the use or enjoyment of surrounding properties or uses thereof (8.28.28.020133). "4. Maintaining Premises Detrimental to Property of Others. Maintaining any condition of premises which is detrimental to the property of others, including, but not limited to, keeping or depositing on the premises, or scattering over the premises, any of the following: "... d. Any fence, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its condition or its inappropriate location; (8.28.28.020134)." 27... any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any of the provisions of this code shall be deemed a public nuisance and may be summarily abated by the city, and each day such condition continues shall be regarded as a new and separate offense." (Section 1.12.010). 3. "Section 7. The abatement schedule is proposed as follows: "A. If the owner intends to repair and rehabilitate the house, submission by the owner by March 10, 2004 of: (1) written authorisation for City staff to inspect the interior of the house and (2) a list of proposed repairs to the house; or, "B. If the owner intends to demolish the house, submission by the owner of a letter by March 10, 2004 declaring the owner's intention to demolish the house "C. Repairs or demolition shall be completed within 120 days after approval by the Community Development Director of the foregoing list of repairs and issuance of a building permit, or within 120 days after issuance of a demolition permit" This schedule, upon good cause shown, may be extended by the Council. 'F:\B9ACD\LanyL\Van Dorn Abateman - CC Staff Report 13.doc 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, FINDING THAT THE PROPERTY AT 24 EIGHTH STREET CONSTITUTES A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING ABATEMENT The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. State and City statutes provide for the abatement of structures and properties determined to be a public nuisance. Section 2. Chapter 8.28 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code contains provisions allowing the City Council to conduct a public hearing to determine whether a public nuisance exists on a property and whether proceedings to abate the nuisance should be initiated. Section 3. The City Council has reviewed written and photographic evidence of substandard conditions on the property at 24 8th Street, Hermosa Beach, and determined that there is sufficient evidence of a public nuisance on the property to set a public hearing to determine if abatement proceedings should be initiated. Section 4. Based on the foregoing, the City Council held a public hearing on February 10, 2004 to determine if the above -reference property constituted a public nuisance. The hearing was duly -noticed pursuant to the procedures outlined in Section 8.28.070 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Section 5. The City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. Chapter 8.28 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code states in part: "The following are expressly declared to be nuisances, and any person maintaining or permitting such nuisances or any of them to be maintained or to exist on his premises whether as owner, lessee or otherwise, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable as hereinafter provided and each and every day in which the nuisance shall be permitted to be continued shall constitute a separate offense: (8.28.28.020) "...3. Actions Damaging the Use or Enjoyment of Property. Harboring or i permitting any premises or permitting individuals or groups using or visiting such premises in a manner which adversely affects the use or enjoyment of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 surrounding properties or uses thereof (8.28.28.020B3). "4. Maintaining Premises Detrimental to Property of Others. Maintaining any condition of premises which is detrimental to the property of others, including, but not limited to, keeping or depositing on the premises, or scattering over the premises, any of the following: "... d. Any fence, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its condition or its inappropriate location; (8.28.28.020B4)." B. From an exterior inspection of the property, the following specific nuisance conditions have been identified by City staff: 1. The property has been left in disrepair for several years 2. The exterior stairway and landing are damaged, unstable, and unsafe 3. Property is regularly trashed and vandalized 4. Property is not properly fenced or secured from intruders 5. The building's paint is peeling and deteriorated 6. The building's wood sheathing is deteriorated 7. Property is overgrown with untended vegetation and weeds 8. The structure on the property is an eyesore 9. Greater than 75% of the building is in need of repair. C. Based on the above observations, documented by photos included in the February 10, 2004 staff report to the City Council, the Council hereby finds that the subject property constitutes a public nuisance; specifically: 1. The property contains a structure, the house, which is unsightly by reason of its condition and therefore detrimental to the property of others (8.28.28.020B4). 2. The condition of the property, its unsightliness and its attraction to vandals and intruders, interferes with neighbors' enjoyment of their properties (8.28.28.020B3). Section 6. The City Council hereby orders that the above-described public nuisance be abated. Abatement actions may consist of either of the following at the option of the property owner: A. Extensive repairs and rehabilitation of the house to correct all of the above- specified nuisance conditions and all Building Code and other code violations, both interior and exterior; or B. Demolition of the house. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Section 7. The abatement schedule shall be as follows: A. If the owner intends to repair and rehabilitate the house, submission by the owner by March 10, 2004 of: (1) written authorization for City staff to inspect the interior of the house and (2) a list of proposed repairs to the house; or B. If the owner intends to demolish the house, submission by the owner of a letter by March 10, 2004 declaring the owner's intention to demolish the house. C. Repairs or demolition shall be completed within 120 days after approval by the Community Development Director of the foregoing list of repairs and issuance of a building permit, or within 120 days after issuance of a demolition permit. Section 8. Upon expiration of the time specified for abatement, the City Attorney shall notify the owner of the affected premises, and other persons having an interest therein, by registered or certified mail of such expiration and inform the owner that abatement must be completed or a further appeal made to the City Council within ten days from the date of mailing. If the abatement period expires and no further appeal is made in response to the preceding City Attorney's notification and if the Community Development Director determines that the owner is not making a good faith effort to comply with the order of abatement, the Director shall schedule the issue for further City Council review to determine if civil or criminal action should be initiated. Section 9. Upon showing of good cause by the owner, the City Council may grant time extensions to the preceding schedule. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 10th day of February 2004. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK . CITY ATTORNEY 8 • RECEIVE* JAN 2 9 2004 COM. DEV. DEPT. 'ocietp of Colonia[ dro art IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 4-w-- � g6-6/ te-) 7s2- se /2o -:714 a / e 200 V, c2G �-n---•� 5t Q v --- 5 - Ceeecu w � I Q ¥ Y A • • �F� �v -,�� ;%y d-� i /u"✓rte-� L. -74/27 10 . .� e - 910 ?t&- 2 /`' 3 Tina & Gary "ItelVE: Pagel of JAN 2 9 2004 COM. DEV DEPT From: "Tina & Gary"<tinagary@southbayrealestate.com> To: <michaelkeegan © manhattanbread.com> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 9:47 AM Subject: Problem property To: Mayor and City Council Re: 28 8th Ct., Hermosa Beach RECEIVED SEI' < < 2003 L/ek-- By this letter we hereby notice the City of hazardous conditions at the above -referenced location. These conditions have been previously reported to the Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments. Effort to board up the structure by the public works crew has slowed access to this abandoned structure. The code enforcement officer has attempted to contact the absentee owner to no avail. The residence has been uninhabited for over a decade. Although attempts by many had controlled illegal access, the property Is now a target of trespassing shelter seekers. The rodents and their droppings are a discerning sight in a residential neighborhood, as well as a hazard to the general health of the neighborhood. Equally alarming is the potential fire hazard this wood building represents. This unattended building is a health and safety issue and must be demolished. We respectfully request that the City Council declare this building a public nuisance and cause its demolition. Sincerely, Gary Brutsch and Tina Williams 310-374-4686 www.southbayrealestate.com 11 • • 11-23--t-\3 TS. t QA -4-e Oc- tkatnry.4•428044 Fewit ---06,71AJEJ N,C)sttyte- RECEIVED 3 a-- Trish- SI: NOV 2 5 2003 at rn3s4 et Rat Per S.J4cri, i-ke Mini) thee. Li I 4kn w2:crit3k) -71-hs (1 EoXeRinYli 0 c 774-E--ifilVotiv%• 5iir_i% r..117% oeWc, :1i) rya / tig.1)55F9ved ii.Ye <!Ai I. g2;, -46.1,1_-_-71,:kiAlscf icirrtona.71"1-6 77- Al s_cs-&-s, fa_iS ei-!=*.erY0.3 4,41.ct-1._i _on) s)tO S—Me _ ' h%szni-ir_S__ECsozz _Titsce- -r)-6i is tin hos 0 _eri.vit _hittF02 0.1.?1,7111-1c ke:tc, cskt_ _ _ tibt4t., 7.1-1c--,__o_P es fittf e 106 torn 04.r 7.446-rktdA4t _ _INN1/4rt, rn+ _ s :41_77\ -\reg _bm4e..),A...:11-64-tini olio; 4-Te_nt-ri .15 diceN n7 -I 44 ?CO 3 3Z- r in tool_ Dtcyfiz6•sr it3_ S -91,Q f.tP6t 3P 3 Vi P- • • Cad---lck 2.2/7)./or CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: February 10, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Sol Blumenfeld rector Community Development Department Stephen Burrell, City Manager Subject: TEXT AMENDMENT 03-5 - REVISIONS TO SECTIONS 17.04.040, 17.10.020K.2, 17.12.0808, 17.14.080B AND 17.16.080B TO DEFINE "TRELLIS" AND TO CLARIFY THE COVERED OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS IN MULTI -FAMILY ZONES Recommendation To continue the subject hearing until the February 24, 2004 meeting. • 7tcV Jai February 4, 2004 007 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Weting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission February 10, 2004 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE ADDING DENSITY BONUS PROVISIONS Recommendation: That the City Council approve the attached ordinance amending Chapter 17.42 of the Zoning Ordinance (General Provisions, Conditions and Exceptional Uses), adding provisions for residential density bonuses. Background: Pursuant to statutory requirements established by the State, each local jurisdiction is required to encourage development of affordable housing by adopting an ordinance that specifies developer incentives to construct affordable housing units. When a developer proposes a housing development that qualifies as affordable as defined under Section 65915 of the Government Code, the local jurisdiction must approve the additional units allowed under the law. Section 65915 requires the granting of density bonuses of 25 percent for 5 or more units over the base density otherwise allowed on a parcel, plus "additional incentives", for development projects that include a percentage of dwelling units which are affordable to lower income households. The City's Zoning Ordinance presently has no provisions for such density bonuses. This discrepancy was recently highlighted in the Coastal Commission staff review of the City's Local Coastal Program (LCP). The purpose of this code amendment is to add such provisions in order to bring the City's Zoning Ordinance into conformity with state law. Analysis: Section 17.42.100 is proposed to be added to the Zoning Ordinance. The new Section references the state Government Code provisions specifying the granting of density bonuses by cities and counties. The key provisions include: 1. Developments Eligible for Density Bonuses —Requirements for eligibility include: a. At least 20 percent of the total units in the project, excluding the density bonus, are restricted to rental or purchase by persons and families of lower income as defined in California Health & Safety Code Section 50105; or b. At least 10 percent of the total units in the project, excluding the density bonus, are restricted to rental or purchase by very low income households, as defined in California Health & Safety Code Section 50105; or c. At least 50 percent of the total units in the project, excluding the density bonus, are restricted to persons 62 years of age or older, or 55 years of age or older in a senior citizen housing development; or d. At least 20 percent of the total dwelling units in a condominium project, excluding the density bonus, are restricted to persons and families of moderate income, as defined in California Health & Safety Code Section 50093; or e. At least 33 percent of the total units, excluding the density bonus, of a condominium project which is a conversion from existing apartments, are restricted to the purchase 5d by persons and families of low or moderate income as defined in California Health & Safety Code Section 50093; or f. At least 15 percent of the total units, excluding the density bonus, of a condominium project that is a conversion from existing apartments, are restricted to purchase by lower income households as defined in California Health & Safety Code Section 50079.5. 2. Additional Incentives — Per the state law, the code amendment also provides for the granting of at least one of the following potential additional incentives to eligible developments. Incentives, to be granted at the discretion of the City, include: a. A reduction in site development standards, zoning code requirements or architectural design requirements which exceed the minimum building standards including, but not limited to, a reduction in setback and square footage requirements and in the ratio of vehicular parking spaces that would otherwise be required. b. Approval of mixed use zoning in conjunction with the housing project. c. Other regulatory incentives or concessions proposed by the developer or the City which result in identifiable cost reductions. Environmental Review: This code amendment is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21080.14: "Affordable Housing Projects in Urbanized Areas", because the amendment provides for the construction of affordable housing consistent with the provision of that Section. Conclusions: The attached code amendment will satisfy the requirements of state law and the state standards for General Plan Housing Elements for density bonus provisions. However, as noted in the City's Housing Element, development factors related to extremely high land values and the limited availability of undeveloped land weigh against developer interest in using the density bonus provision in the City. SoTB{umenfeld, IPirecior Community Dev opment Department Concur Burrell, , City Manager en Attachments: 1. Resolution Recommending Approval 2. Draft Ordinance Amending Municipal Code 2 DensityBonusrpt AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSE None None senboom, Perrotti .Pizer, ucker one 8. TEXT 03-14 — Text amendment regarding State mandated density bonus ordinance. Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said Text Amendment. Director Blumenfeld expressed the need to amend the Zone Code to comport with the State requirements for establishing density bonus provisions; explained that the statutory requirements encourage the goals for affordable housing in every jurisdiction; stated that every city must adopt an ordinance that specifies incentives to construct affordable housing units; and pointed out that this City's Zoning Ordinance has no provisions for such density bonuses. He mentioned that this omission was pointed out by the Coastal Commission; stated that Section 17.42.100 is the proposed section to be amended in the City's Zoning Ordinance, providing the granting of density bonuses that are consistent with State law — pointing out that these provisions have been directly taken from State law. Director Blumenfeld highlighted the developments eligible for density bonuses, which are reflected in staff report (of record); stated that per State law, there are additional incentives that would solely be at the discretion of the City; and noted that this code amendment would satisfy State law and State standards for General Plan Housing Elements. Because of the extremely high land values in this City and the limited availability of undeveloped land, Director Blumenfeld explained that these circumstances may weigh against practicality and a developer's interest in utilizing the density bonus provisions. He highlighted the HUD -based income figures and household size ranges for affordable housing. Chairman Hoffinan opened the public hearing; there being no public input, Chairman Hoffman closed the public hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to APPROVE TEXT 03-14 -- Text amendment regarding State mandated density bonus ordinance. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Hoffinan, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 9. ing_Plan to allow a vocational scho _ rapy and spa -related training with sh . sopping center at 1137 Aviation Planning Commission Minutes September 16, 2003 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION P.C. 03-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE GRANTING OF DENSITY BONUSES FOR PROJECTS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. State law requires that local jurisdictions provide for the granting of density bonuses for development projects with housing units affordable to lower income households and/or senior citizens. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to provide for the granting of such density bonuses on September 16, 2003, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby forwards the draft code amendment, attached hereto, to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. Section 4. This code amendment is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21080.14: "Affordable Housing Projects in Urbanized Areas", because the amendment provides for the construction of affordable housing consistent with the provision of that Section. VOTE: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 03-52 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of September 16, 2003. X1;1.1, YaPe er offinan 11 airman September 16.2003 Date • t ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE GRANTING OF DENSITY BONUSES FOR PROJECTS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does ordain as follows: $ECT1ON 1. State law requires that local jurisdictions provide for the granting of density bonuses for development projects with housing units affordable to lower income households and/or senior citizens. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to provide for the granting of such density bonuses on September 16, 2003, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission, whereupon the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment. SECTION 3. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider and review the code amendment and the recommendation of the Planning Commission on February 10, 2004 at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, and the record of the Planning Commission's recommendation was presented to and considered by the City Council. SECTION 4. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby ordains that Chapter 17.42 of Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended by adding thereto a new section 17.42.100 to read as follows: "17.42.100 Residential density bonuses. "As required by California Government Code Section 65915, a project of five or more units shall be allowed a density increase of twenty-five percent above the maximum permitted density in the zone if the project complies with one or more of the following criteria: "A At least twenty percent of the total units in the project, excluding the density bonus, are restricted to rental or purchase by persons and families of lower income as defined in California Health & Safety Code Section 50105; or "B. At least ten percent of the total units in the project, excluding the density bonus, are restricted to rental or purchase by very low income households, as defined in California Health & Safety Code Section 50105; or "C. At least fifty percent of the total units in the project, excluding the density bonus, are restricted to persons 62 years of age or older, or 55 years of age or older in a senior citizen housing development; or 3- "D. At least twenty percent of the total dwelling units in a condominium project, excluding the density bonus, are restricted to persons and families of moderate income, as defined in California Health & Safety Code Section 50093; or "E. At least thirty-three percent of the total units, excluding the density bonus, of a condominium project which is a conversion from existing apartments, are restricted to the purchase by persons and families of low or moderate income as defined in California Health & Safety Code Section 50093; or "F. At least fifteen percent of the total units, excluding the density bonus, of a condominium project that is a conversion from existing apartments, are restricted to purchase by lower income households as defined in California Health & Safety Code Section 50079.5. "In addition, at least one of the additional concession or incentive set forth in Government Code Section 65915(j) shall be offered for projects supplying low or moderate income housing utilizing a 25 percent density bonus, unless the decision making body finds in writing that the additional concession or incentive is not required in order to provide for affordable housing costs as defined in Health & Safety Code Section 50052.5, or for rents for the targeted units to be set as specified in Government Code Section 65915(c). Alternatively, in lieu of the above, the City may offer other incentives or concessions of equivalent financial value based upon the land cost per dwelling unit." SECTION 5. This code amendment is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21080.14: "Affordable Housing Projects in Urbanized Areas", because the amendment provides for the construction of affordable housing consistent with the provision of that Section. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 10th day of February 2004 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY i 7 • January 20, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council February 10, 2004 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 03-3 - TO CLARIFY THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SNACK SHOPS AND RESTAURANTS Planning Commission Recommendation: To recommend the City Council amend the snack shop definition by introducing the attached ordinance. Background: On February 18, 2003, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of a text amendment to clarify the definition of snack shop in order to differentiate it from restaurants. Clarifying the difference between a snack shop and a restaurant is important as it affects the required parking for the business. A restaurant is required to provide 10 spaces per 1000 square feet of floor area and a retail shop is required to provide 4 spaces per 1000 square feet of floor area. In many instances a business cannot provide all parking on site, and the parking can only be satisfied through approval of a Parking Plan by the Planning Commission to accept in -lieu parking. Since payment of in -lieu parking fees is a major cost for a business, the Planning Commission directed staff to revise the definition to eliminate ambiguity. Analysis: The Commission discussed the following items to help clarify the distinction between restaurants and snack shops in addition to the current limitation on types of food available: 1. Prohibition of table (waiter/waitress) service. 2. Limitation on the amount of seating 3. Limitation on the public service area relative to gross floor area. 4. Restriction on the types of kitchen hoods. After considering these options the Commission decided to revise the definition to prohibit table service and require limited seating and limited public service area, but rejected restricting the type of kitchen hood. r With respect to the amount of seating and public area, the Commission considered examples of some existing snack shops that have previously obtained Planning Commission approval for relief of parking requirements based on their use as a snack shop and decided to simply refer to limited service area relative to gross floor area and limited seating capacity, rather than assigning a specific limitation on the number of seats and the amount of public service area. 2 The Commission recommended amendments to both the definition section and the parking section for snack shops. Food types, and type of table service are included in the definition. Additional general language relating to seating limitations and the amount of public area are included in the parking standards as they relate to parking demand. The proposed amendment to the definition of snack shop is: "Snack shop or snack bar means a retail establishment that is distinguished from a restaurant as it does not include waiter/waitress table service and does not serve full meals or have a kitchen capable of serving meals but instead serves snacks or non-alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises or for take-out ; specifically, items sdch as donuts and other baked Roods ice cream, yogurt, coolies, coffee. tea and juices are considered snacks. and -the -Planning 5e • • The proposed amendment to parking requirements, Section 17.44.030(0), is: "The parking requirements for a snack bar and or snack shop shall be the same as that for restaurant, unless it can be shown to the Planning Commission that the characteristics of the building; its location, size and other mitigating factors such as limited service area relative to gross floor area and limited seating capacity result in less parkingdemand than for a restaurant use. In these cases the Planning Commission may consider the retail commercial requirement for parking, pursuant to Section 17.44.210 Parking Plans." CONCUR: enssiali So B umenfeld, 1 irector Community D- -lopmentDepartment Stephen R. City Manager Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. Planning Commission Resolution Minutes Notes: en Ro • ertson Senior Planner 1. The Uniform Building Code requires Type I hoods for venting over cooling units including deep fat fryers, broilers, fry grills, seam jacked kettles, hot top range oven, barbecues, rotisseries and other similar equipment that produces comparable amounts of steam, smoke, grease or heat The Commission considered modifying the definition of snack shop to prohibit Type I hoods, but recognized that would also prohibit such traditional snack shop businesses as donut shops or oxide shops. 2. The following businesses have been approved as snack shops with varing floor area, percent of public area and amount of seating Page 2 Gross floor Area (sq.ft) Public Area (sgft) ' Percent Public Area Approx. Seating Java Man 1000 650 65% 44 Espresso Wash (now vacant) 1140 600 53% 20 Starbucks, P.C.H. 1400 800 57% 30+ Starbucks, Hermosa Ave. 1500 800 53% 40 Page 2 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ORDINANCE 04 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 17.04 DEFINITIONS, AND CHAPTER 17.44 OFF-STREET PARKING PERTAINING TO THE DEFINITION AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR SNACK SHOPS. The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on February 18, 2003, to consider amending the Zoning Ordinance definition and parking requirements for snack shops to more clearly distinguish snack shops from restaurants. Section 2. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on January 27, 2004, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission to amend Sections 17.04.050 and 17.44.030(0) of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to definition and parking requirements for snack shops. Section 3. The subject text amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to the general rule set forth in Section 15061(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as there is no possibility that these modifications to the Zoning Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. Section 4. Based on the evidence considered at the public hearing and the recommendation of the Planning Commission the City Council hereby ordains that the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Title 17 -Zoning, be amended as follows: 1. Amend Section 17.04.050 Commercial Land Use Definition as follows (underlined text to be added): "Snack shop or snack bar means a retail establishment that is distinguished from a restaurant as it does not include waiter/waitress table service and does not serve full meals or have a kitchen capable of serving meals but instead serves snacks or non- alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises or for take-out usually -for specifically, items such as donuts and other baked goods, ice cream, yogurt, cookies, coffee, tea, and juices are considered snacks. and -the 2. Amend Section 17.44.030(0) to read as follows (underlined text to be added): "The parking requirements for a snack bar and or snack shop shall be the same as that for a restaurant, unless it can be shown to the Planning Commission that the characteristics of tM building; its location, size and other mitigating factors such as limited service area relative to gross floor area and limited seating capacity result in less 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 parking .. emand than for a restaurant use. In these cases the Planning Commission may consider the retail commercial requirement for parking, pursuant to Section 17.44.210 Parking Plans." PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2004, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney 4- ctor Blumenfeld noted for Commissioner Tucker that the applicants will be provided fo which .ut these new requirements for development standards. Chairman Piz - • . ened the public hearing. There being no input, the hearing wa • • sed. MOTION by Commissu • -r Kersenboom, seconded by V' -- hairman Hoffman, to APPROVE TEXT 03-5 -- Text ndment regarding limi • '.ns of open space coverage for trellis structures, that a trellis may be a • -d to cove entire open area as long as the open areas between the trellis beams are equal to o seeds the area required to remain open and uncovered. The motion carried as follows AYES: Hoffman, Ke NOES: None ABSTAIN: ABSENT. oom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker 10. TEXT 03-3 — Text amendment regarding snack shop definition. Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said text amendment. Director Blumenfeld explained that after further consideration and study, staff believes the suggestion to limit seating in snack shops to 10 would not be a workable solution and that it would be difficult for a snack shop business to adhere to this requirement and work within the 50 percent public -to -private area. Director Blumenfeld suggested the following text amendment: Prohibition of table (waiter/waitress) service; Limitation on the amount of seating; Limitation on the public service area relative to gross floor area. Director Blumenfeld highlighted the proposed amendment to the definition for snack shop: "Snack shop or snack bar means a retail establishment that is distinguished from a restaurant as it does not include waiter/waitress table service and does not serve full meals or have a kitchen capable of serving meals but instead serves snacks or non-alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises or for take-out; specifically, items such as donuts and other baked goods, ice cream, yogurt, cookies, coffee, tea, and juices are considered snacks." Director Blumenfeld noted staff's suggested amendment for the parking section: "The parking requirements for a snack bar and or snack shop shall be the same as that for restaurant, unless it can be shown to the Planning Commission that the characteristics of the building, its location, size and other mitigating factors such as limited service area relative to gross floor area and limited seating capacity result in less parking demand than for a restaurant use. In these cases the Planning Commission may consider the retail commercial requirement for parking, pursuant to Section 17.44.210 Parking Plan." He explained that this amendment should give the Planning Commission more ground rules to make its determinations; and stated that in all cases, the owners would be compelled to come before the Planning Commission for approval relative to snack shop and the retail parking requirement. He added that the Planning Commission will be leasing its determinations on a series of issues, such as limited floor to public area, limited seating 5 Planning Commission Minutes February 18, 2003 • capacity, location, and the size of the establishment. Director Blumenfeld stated for Chairman Pizer that in order to be considered a retail parking requirement, the applicant would have to have an approved parking plan; otherwise, the applicant's business facility would be considered a restaurant. Chairman Pizer opened the public hearing. There being no public input, the hearing was closed. MOTION by Commissioner Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to APPROVE TEXT 03-3 -- Text amendment regarding snack shop definition as follows: "Snack shop or snack bar means a retail establishment that is distinguished from a restaurant as it does not include waiter/waitress table service and does not serve full meals or have a kitchen capable of serving meals but instead serves snacks or non-alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises or for take-out; specifically, items such as donuts and other baked goods, ice cream, yogurt, cookies, coffee, tea, and juices are considered snacks." And to include the suggested amendment for the parking section: "The parking requirements for a snack bar and or snack shop shall be the same as that for restaurant, unless it can be shown to the Planning Commission that the characteristics of the building, its location, size and other mitigating factors such as limited service area relative to gross floor area and limited seating capacitv result in less parking demand than for a restaurant use. In these cases the Planning Commission may consider the retail commercial requirement for parking, pursuant to Section 17.44.210 Parking Plan." The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker None None None TEXT 03-1 — Text amendment regarding downtown parking require ntinued from January 21, 2003 meeting). Staff Recommen ction: To recommend approval of said text amendment Director Blumenfeld stated area; and explained that it is requirements — highlighting the propos per 1,000 in order to encourage retail deve tends to have less parking demand in the evenin have very high parking demands in the eve requirements for restaurant use would provisions currently in place in the projects of 5,000 square feet or conversion of retail res amendment for the s Page 3 of staff r would need approval to update the City's in -lieu parking requirement, which would this text amendm City's inten o redu ent would apply e t to try and ce the p ent. usively to the Downtown ance the Downtown parking g requirement for retail uses to 3 explained that the retail development opposed to restaurant uses, which tend to r Blumenfeld added that the parking except that the change of use for a credit of parking for be to discourage the proposed text fleeted on ution g. Dire ain at 10 per 1, ing Ordinance would not a — pointing out that the intent here w ant space. Director Blumenfeld stated that al Downtown Parking District requirement provisions ar rt Items A through E (of record); and he added that a separate r 6 Planning Commission Minutes February 18, 2003 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION P.C. 03-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 17.04 DEFINITIONS AND CHAPTER 17.44 OFF-STREET PARKING PERTAINING TO THE DEFINITION AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR SNACK SHOPS. The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on February 18, 2003, to consider amending the Zoning Ordinance definition and parking requirements for snack shops to more clearly distinguish snack shops from restaurants. Section 2. Based on the evidence considered at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: 1. The Zoning Ordinance contains a definition for snack shop to distinguish it from a restaurant, and contains a separate parking requirement for snack shops. 2. The definition for snack shop can be made to more clearly distinguish a snack shop from a restaurant and the parking section can provide more guidance to the Planning Commission as to when its appropriate to allow less parking for a snack shop than a restaurant. Section 3. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Title 17 -Zoning, Chapter 17.44, be amended as follows: 1. Amend Section 17.04.050 Commercial Land Use Definition as follows (underlined text to be added): "Snack shop or snack bar means a retail establishment that is distinguished from a restaurant as it does not include waiter/waitress table service and does not serve full meals or have a kitchen capable of serving meals but instead serves snacks or non- alcoholic beverages for consumption on the lfremises or for take-out usually -fee specifically, items such as donuts and other baked goods, ice cream, yogurt, cookies, coffee, tea, and juices are considered snacks. and -the 2. Amend Section 17.44.030(0) to read as follows: "The parking requirements for a snack bar and or snack shop shall be the same as that for a restaurant, unless it can be shown to the Planning Commission that the characteristics of the building; its location, size and other mitigating factors such as limited service area relative to gross floor area and limited seating capacity result in Less parkingdemand than for a restaurant use. In these cases 7 J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 i the Planning Commission may consider the retail commercial requirement for parking, pursuant to Section 17.44.210 Parking Plans." VOTE: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 03-12 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of February 18, 2003. I Ron Pizer, Chair!nan February 18, 2003 Date 1 Sol Blumenfe •, S-cretary ► City o f 2%rmosa ileacly V Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach CITY CLERK California 90254-3884 0 2 7J I 0ti1,-I EN!, .i (')U+ .j L. (-27 Jc.)(' ii\ Do (;".e.%� SL (0 J v.-1 vti t\((,..ii C ore-__ _ �� �. 2-11.AtJ °CA- -77 Mt) oq ! S- L Jr°/;-y°o % 10 (`'b'f'L,c • • Steve Page 1 of 1 From: Julian Katz [juliank@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 4:50 PM To: mikehbpw©yahoo.com; Rick Morgan; Steve Cc: kenkam2@aol.com; juliank@msn.com Subject: Hermosa Beach Lawn Bowling Club Based on my phone conversation with Steve B. today, I would like to refresh our request for funding to resod the bare places on the green. See the details below from our previous email. We will plan to attend the 10 February council meeting in support of our request. Thank you again for your consideration Gentlemen, It has been several years since we have been able to spend any funds for replacing any of the turf on the green. We realize the difficult financial situation here in California and in our city and understand that the funds to replace the complete green are not available. We would like to request that you look again and see if you could find $4,000.00 that could be used to resod the worst places on the green. Holding off the decline of the playing surface would be money well spent in light of our inabilty to afford total replacement of the surface. Thank you for your consideration. Julian Katz Vice President, HBLBC 1125 Ninth St. Hermosa Beach, Ca. Get a FREE online virus check fojyour PC here from McAfee. 2/10/2004 SUPPLEMENTAL 6a INFORMATION • a"�J"nuary 2 004 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 10, 2004 MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, budget transfers and fund balances as shown in the attached Budget Summary and Revenue Worksheet. 2. Approve a change to the year-end transfer of unspent funds to allocate amounts to the Compensated Absences Fund, the Capital Improvement Fund, the Insurance Fund and to a new Retirement Stabilization Fund. It is also recommended that we transfer any funds in excess of our goal in the Contingency Fund to the new Retirement Fund. BACKGROUND: The City has conducted a Midyear Budget Review annually since fiscal year 1981-82. The review is a good tool to ensure that assumptions and estimates originally used to prepare the budget ten months earlier remain realistic. ANALYSIS: Overview The revenue changes recommended herein reflect small net increases in both the General Fund and Parking Fund. Significant line item changes are discussed below. Revenue fsee Revenue Worksheet) The overall change in revenue in the General Fund is $427,537 or 2.7%. Though the overall change is small, there are some notable changes. Taxes The tax category, overall, increases by 5.00%. Secured Property Taxes increase 9% over 2002-03, based on the actual levy, 3% over our original estimate. This increase is consistent with the past four years' history, given the increases in residential property values and the turnover rate. Sales tax for the first two quarters is virtually flat compared to 02/03, which is good news! The Volkswagen dealership stayed at their site longer than originally anticipated and BMW new car sales have not moved to their new location yet. Even after adjusting for anticipated lower than normal supermarket sales due to the strike, the sales tax estimate is being increased by 5%. The chart below compares sales tax on major accounts for the first half of this year to the first half of last year by the top ten categories. 1 F:BUDGETMYBUDGEI 6a SALES TAX Comparison of First Half of 2002/03 to 2003/04 Top Ten Categories RANK/BUSINESS CLASS* Sales Tax IncJ % of Percent 2003-04 (Dec.) Change of Total Prev. Yr. 1. AUTO DEALERS 5342,793 $51,619 17.73% 31.54% 2. EATING/DRINKING PLACES 325,329 16,314 5.28 29.93 3. GROCERY STORES/LIQUOR STORES 102,429 (5,205) -4.84 9.42 4. LUMBER/BUILDING MATERIALS 75,819 3,510 4.85 6.98 5. SPORTING GOODS/BICYCLES 61,211 6,858 12.62 5.63 6. AUTO LEASES 58,010 (9,961) -14.65 5.34 7. SERVICE STATIONS 44,048 6,426 17.08 4.05 8. SPECIALTY STORES 31,434 2,700 9.40 2.89 9. HOUSEHOLD/HOME FURNISHINGS 30,893 4,406 16.63 2.84 10. AUTO REPAIR SHOPS 15,004 (1,965) -11.58 1.38 • Drug stores cannot be listed because there is only one Sales Tax Comparison by Geographic Area Revenue % OF Percent Revenue % Of LOCATION 2002-03 Total Change 2003-04 Total PCH 599,024 59% 10% 658,691 60% Downtown 246,172 24% 4% 256,234 24% PierNalley/Monterey 136,659 13% -5% 130,477 12% Aviation 39,909 4% -2% 39,137 4% 2003-04 MIDYEAR SALES TAX BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA Pier/Valtey/ Aviation Monterey 4% 12% Downtown PCH 24% 60% 2 F?SUDGE1WYBUDGENAIDYEAR2003O4.DOC C. Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is being adjusted up by approximately 9%. For the first half, the hotels are up by about that amount. (excluding the Hampton Inn, which had just opened in the second quarter of last year) As you can see below, the TOT revenue trend is very positive. TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX 1A00,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 op ,�K1Pyq q qe elry „pry�� t" c�' ti Utility User Tax revenue is being revised up to recognize higher revenue from both gas and wireless telephone providers. Fines and Forfeitures The estimate for Municipal Court Fines is increasing based on revenue for the first half. Revenue from the court for moving violations and other municipal code violations is up 10%. Revenue from misdemeanor court cases is up 74%. Intergovernmental/State The decline in revenue in this category is in the In Lieu Motor Vehicle Account, or the so-called "car tax", "VLF" (vehicle license fees) that has been in the news so much lately. Our share of the $1.3B reduction to local government, $280,054, is the amount estimated for the League of California Cities. A simplified history on why this reduction occurred: When vehicle license fees (VLF) were reduced in 2001, the amount was fully backfilled by transfers from the state general fund, holding cities and counties harmless. In June of 2003, when the Governor declared that there were insufficient revenues to fund the backfill, higher rates went into effect, commencing with registrations due in October. Therefore the period between June and October constituted a "gap", for which cities and counties would not receive these backfill funds. The reduction is supposedly a one-time reduction and is to be repaid by August 2006. 3 FWBUDGETMYBUDGETMIDYEAR200304.DOC C. Additional Appropriations The following additional appropriations are requested: GENERAL FUND (001) City Clerk Part-time/Temporary $5,184 Election premium was not included in original budget request. TOTAL GENERAL FUND $5,184 PARKS/REC FACILITY TAX FUND (125) Community Center Facilities Study Contract Services/Private ($25,000) Reduction due to midyear revenue estimate. Public Works CIP 507 Valley Park Improvements Contract Services/Private ($21,471) Project has been completed. Public Works CIP 630 Pier Renovation/Phase III Contract Services/Private ($7,702) Reduction due to midyear revenue estimate. TOTAL PARKS/REC FACILITY TAX FUND ($54,173) PROPOSITION C FUND (146) Public Works CIP 174 Artesia Boulevard Rehabilitation Contract Services/Private ($39,885) Project costs will be less than anticipated. TOTAL PROPOSITION C FUND ($39,885) GRANT FUND (150) Public Works Sewers & Storm Drains (Beverage Recycling Grant) Contract Services/Private Fire Assistance to Firefighters Grant Equipment more than $1,000 $2,542 Additional costs for grant administration. $47,700 Grant for diesel exhaust air cleaning 4 F: BUDGETMYBUDGENADYEAR2003W.DOD 6• TOTAL GRANT FUND OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT FUND (151) Be Street Smart Hermosa Grant Overtime Conference/Training Equipment less than $1,000 TOTAL OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT FUND SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES (COPS) FUND (153) C.O.P.S. Program Equipment more than $1,000 TOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND FIRE PROTECTION FUND (180) Public Works CIP 610 Fire Station Upstairs Remodel/Addition Contract Services/Private TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (301) Public Works CIP 189 Street Improvements/Myrtle Area Contract Services/Private CIP 507 Valley Park Improvements Contract Services/Private CIP 622 City Hall Remodel Contract Services/Private TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND MO system for Fire station. $50,242 ($2,356) Expended more in 2002-03 than ($1,000) anticipated. $797 OTS rearranged funding in 2003-04. ($2,559) ($60,000) Document imaging system no longer needed due to change in records management system provider. ($60,000) ($47,700) Grant approved for diesel exhaust air cleaning system for fire station. ($47,700) ($202,704) Project costs will be less than anticipated. ($121,369) Project has been completed. ($1,386) Project has been completed. ($325,459) 5 F:BUDGETMYBUDGEIWIDYEM2003-04.DOC MYRTLE UNDERGROUND DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUND (307) Utility Undergrounding/Myrtle Avenue Contract Services/Private TOTAL MYRTLE UNDERGROUND DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUND The City Council's adopted policies are: $33 Actual cost higher than estimate. Adjust Budget to prevent expenditures in excess of appropriations at the fund level. $33 Financial Policies General Fund - Any funds remaining unspent at year-end in the General Fund transfer equally to the Contingency Fund, Insurance Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund and the Capital Improvement Fund. Contingency Fund — Goal of fund balance equal to 15% of the General Fund appropriations for economic uncertainties, unforeseen emergencies. Insurance Fund — Goal of $3,000,00 in retained eamings for claims reserves and catastrophic losses. Equipment Replacement Fund — Goal of retained eamings equal to the accumulated amount calculated for all equipment, based on replacement cost and useful life of equipment. Compensated Absences Fund — Goal of fund balance equal to 50% funding for accrued liabilities for employee vacation, sick and compensatory time. For 2002-03, the transfer from the General Fund was changed, on a one-time basis, to transferl/3 each to the Contingency Fund, CIP Fund and the Insurance Fund. Progress on Goals Fund Name Goal Compensated Absences Fund $448,271 50.00% Contingency Fund $2,635,133 15.0% Insurance Fund $3,000,000 Equipment Replacement Fund Balance $184,192 20.54% $3,003,603 17.10% $1,743,941 Over/Under Goal Amount ($264,079) -29.46% $368,470 2.10% ($1,256,059) $1,849,864 $1,303,754 ($546,110) 6 FABUDGErvttBUDGE1 WIOYEAR200344.DOC The Challenge for Next Year Although the midyear review is positive, with a net increase to the General Fund fund balance of $383,436, there are several factors affecting next year's budget that will make it more of a challenge to balance: • The Governor's proposed budget would transfer $1.36 in property tax from local government to the State. The impact to Hermosa Beach would be $287,478. This number could change, of course, depending on what the Legislature does. • Replacement of the Volkswagen dealership with a Savon Drug Store will produce Tess revenue. • BMW new car sales, if not the entire dealership, will be moving to their new location. • Retirement costs will increase by approximately 62%. 38% of the increase is due to changes in the rates and 24% is because the Miscellaneous Employee Plan is no longer superfunded (we were using these excess funds to pay PERS costs). The increase is estimated to be about $1.2 million. • Dispatching costs with the South Bay Regional Communications Center (RCC) increase next year by approximately $80,000 (you will recall that we recognized substantial savings in 2003-04 by making the change to RCC). The increased costs for next year are still lower than they would have been had we not made the change). • The balance in the Lighting and Landscaping District will be almost depleted by year-end, necessitating either a return to the voters for an increase in funding or a sizable reduction in services. Some steps have already been taken to address the above. To name a few - some positions have been frozen, plans for reducing the fleet have been developed, and a user fee review is in the final stage. Staff has also started developing a list of other alternatives that could be implemented to address the shortfall. Conclusion We have reached our goal of 15% for the Contingency Fund. We are actually at 17%, with excess funds of $368,470 projected. However, we are below our goal in the Compensated Absences Fund due to employees terminating or retiring. Recognizing the challenges we are facing for next year, it is recommended that we transfer any funds available at year-end in the General Fund to the Compensated Absences Fund, the Capital Improvement Fund, the Insurance Fund and to a new Retirement Stabilization Fund. It is also recommended that we transfer any funds in excess of our goal in the Contingency Fund to the new Retirement Fund. Those funds could then be used to offset the increased retirement costs for next year. 2004-05 budget preparations begin immediately after the midyear revisions are approved. /' � Respectfully submitted, Co cur: Viki Copeland Stephen -.=urreil Finance Director City Manager 7 F:WUDGEPMYBUDGE1WIDYE 2003-0o.DOC revilex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksheet Page: 1 4 02105/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 001 General Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 2,043,406 1,851,703 4,689,427 4,978,251 5,123,901 145,650 3102 Current Year Unsecured 281,744 247,985 308,196 312,680 308,211 4,469- 3103 Prior Year Collections 64,257 42,378 112,090 100,000 112,000 12,000 3106 Supplemental Roll SB81373,589 51,369 172,434 132,000 173,000 41,000 3107 Transfer Tax 107,605 88,395 194,035 187,067 225,737 38,670 8 Sales Tax 1,195,038 1,186,884 2,508,346 2,335,293 2,452,641 117,548 09 1/2 Cent Sales Tx Ext 52,800 48,940150,453 148,221 160,000 11,779 3110 Cable TV Franchise 36,843 52,627 215,436 208,000 220,000 12,000 3111 Electric Franchise 0 0 62,518 63,000 60,000 3,000- 3112 Gas Franchise 0 0 37,247 37,000 37,000 0 3113 Refuse Franchise 79,001 77,159 170,215160,000 160,000 0 3114 Transient Occupancy Tax 378,953 552,784 1,054,272 1,105,321 1,201,445 96,124 3115 Business License 308,732 314,846 689,270 682,000 682,000 0 3120 Utility User Tax 974,144 978,430 2,137,976 2,098,600 2,237,851 139,251 Total Taxes 5,596,112 5,493,500 12,501,915 12,547,433 13,153,986 606,553 3200 Licenses And Permits 3202 Dog Licenses 7,368 7,230 8,9769,000 9,000 0 3203 Bicycle Licenses 0 35 49 50 50 0 04 Building Permits 191,794 156,097 300,433 267,400 267,400 0 05 Electric Permits 30,775 26,119 45,537 56,000 56,000 0 3206 Plumbing Permits 20,732 19,506 36,512 40,250 40,250 0 3207 Occupancy Permits 3,350 4,460 8,560 8,700 7,000 1,700- 3209 Garage Sales 45 51 81 100 100 0 3211 Banner Permits 1,083 1,173 3,2973,000 3,000 0 3212 Animal/Fowl Permits 54 64 128 0 54 54 3213 Animal Redemption Fee 1,053 1,097 1,985 2,200 2,200 0 3214 Amplified Sound Permit 675 617 1,023 1,000 1,000 0 3215 Temporary Sign Permit 304 187 1,660 912 912 0 . Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 1 revflex.rpt ZUus-U4 1wlayear Kev vvOrrcSneet 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 001 General Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3216 Spray Booth Permit 0 0 0 125 0 125- 3217 Open Fire Permit 106 53 53 100 106 6 3218 Auto Repair Permit 4,366 0 0 2,514 4,366 1,852 3219 Newsrack Permits 225 0 0 0 1,800 1,800 3225 Taxicab Permits 0 9,388 163,388 154,000 154,000 0 • Total Licenses And Permits 261,930 226,077 571.682 545,351 547.238 1,887 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3301 Municipal Court Fines 154.962 103,086 276,786 230,000 280,000 50,000 Total Fines & Forfeitures 154,962 103,086 276,786 230,000 280,000 50.000 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 15,668 34,021 85,446 65,125 50,592 14,533- 3402 Rents & Concessions 19 152 241 300 300 0 3403 Pier Revenue 477 592 1,149 1,300 1,300 0 3404 Community Center Leases 31,897 31,610 64,526 64,000 64.000 0 3405 Community Center Rentals 39,946 23,238 68,849 35,000 45.000 10,000 3406 Community Center Theatre 26,460 24,993 68,388 45,000 45,000 0 3411 Other Facilities 6,088 8,941 11,730 12,000 10,000 2,000- 3412 Tennis Courts 11,260 14,457 19,460 22,000 20,000 2,000- 18 Special Events 19,907 18,983 51,041 40,000 40,000 0 450 Investment Discount 0 135 135 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 1,104- 2,448- 3,949- 2,206- 2,004- 202 Total Use Of Money & Property i 150,618 154,674 367,016 282,519 274,188 8,331- 3500 Intergovemmental/State 3504 In Lieu Off Highway 340 309 507 507 507 0 3505 In Lieu Motor Vehicle 174,689 537,649 1,109,279 1,040,000 759,946 280,054- 3507 Highway Maintenance 0 0 1,864 1,864 1,864 0 3508 Mandated Costs 729 729 729 0 729 729 3509 Homeowner Property Tax Relief 10,499 10,413 69,423 70,810 70,000 810 - Note = Memorandum Budge 4 Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 2 5 revflex.rpt ZUus-U4 Midyear rev vvort(sneut • -a-• 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH v • 001 General Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3510 POST 16 2,350 8,081 0 2,500 2,500 3511 STC -Service Officer Training 0 0 5,533 0 0 0 Total Intergovemmental/State 186,273 551,450 1,195,416 1,113,181 835,546 277,635- 3800 Current Service Charges 3801 Residential Inspection 8,650 8,695 19,595 15,000 15,000 0 3802 Sign Review 1,133 915 2,666 2,060 2,060 0 05 Environmental Impact 377 2,251 3,382 2,262 2,262 0 Conditional Use Permit Amendment 2,045 2,442 4,487 2,454 2.454 0 3806 Board Of Appeals 191 0 0 0 191 191 3807 Refuse Lien Fees/Consolidated 3,439 2,316 737 737 572 165- 3808 Zone Variance Review 4,720 4,687 8,227 4,720 4,720 0 3809 Tentative Map Review 1,175 0 1,175 1,175 1,175 0 3810 Final Map Review 3,157 3,125 4,273 5,740 5,740 0 3811 Zone Change/Gen Plan Amendment 3,064 6,128 13,788 0 3,064 3,064 3812 Conditional Use Review 11,108 16,435 25,053 20,682 20,682 0 3813 Plan Check Fees 123,510 103,656 192,490 194,480 194,480 0 3814 Planning/Zoning Appeal 618 618 618 618 618 0 3815 Public Works Services 12,796 5,277 15,698 14,000 14,000 0 3818 Police Services 465 729 5,719 2,500 1,000 1,500- 3819 Jail Services 9,972 22,408 29,337 35,000 20,000 15,000- .3 Special Event Security/Police 23,486 29,883 57,985 30,000 35,000 5,000 5 Public Notice Posting 34 51 51 51 51 0 3827 Ubrary Grounds Maintenance 8,912 8,488 8,488 8,912 8,912 0 3831 Street Cut Inspection 29,133 28,638 49,898 44,000 44,000 0 3833 Recreation Service Charges 2,106 2,329 4,266 5,000 5,000 0 3834 Encroachment Permit 67,092 58,000 102,859 120,000 120,000 0 3837 Retumed Check Charge 570 540 1,010 1,000 1,000 0 3838 Sale Of Maps/Publications 93 40 140 150 150 0 3839 Photocopy Charges 377 593 1,101 700 700 0 3840 Ambulance Transport 85,471 66,879 142,164 146,000 146,000 0 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 3 /0 revflex.rpt ZUUJ-U4 Ivuayear tcev vvul nm teei. 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 001 General Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3841 Police Towing 17,820 20,024 43,018 30,000 35,000 5,000 3857 Parking Plan Application 4,700 2,284 4,634 3,525 4,700 1,175 3859 Refuse Lien Fee/B.F.I. 245- 4,026 1,034 0 0 0 3862 Alarm Permit Fee 380 412 1,020 800 800 0 3863 False Alarm Fee 0 0 0 300 300 0 3866 Nonconforming Remodels 5,136 3,376 8,512 6,848 6,848 0 7 Precise Development Plans 14,620 25,826 31,674 29,240 29,240 0 68 Public Noticing/300 Ft Radius 12,680 17,118 27,262 27,896 27,896 0 3869 2nd Party Response 0 0 0 100 100 0 3870 Legal Determination Hearing 1,274 1,274 1,274 1,274 1,274 0 3875 Spray Booth Inspection (Annual) 0 0 0 - 359 0 359- 3878 Reinspection Fee 224 878 1,774 1,680 448 1,232- 3881 Roller Hockey Rink Rental Insurance 0 105- 105- 0 0 0 3882 Spec Event Security/Fire 1,781 609 6,632 5,000 1,781 3,219- 3883 FinaVTentative Map Extension 287 1,124 1,985 861 861 0 3884 Lot Line Adjustment 0 0 658 0 0 0 3886 Text Amendment/Private 0 0 568 0 0 0 3887 Voluntary Lot Merger 0 606 606 408 408 0 3888 Planning Commission Appeals 1,688 832 2,942 2,532 2,532 0 3890 300 Ft Radius Noticing/Appeal to CC 1,208 3,308 5 552 3,740 3,740 0 3 Contract Recreation Classes 174,684 160,758 263,083 250,000 250,000 0 4 Other Recreation Programs 48,191 42,151 67,078 45,000 50,000 5,000 3896 Mailing Fee 0 6 6 0 0 0 3897 Admin Fee/TULIP Ins Certificate 224 1,092 438 350 350 0 3898 Height Limit Exception 0 0 409 0 0 0 3899 C.U.P. Minor Amendment 0 233 233 236 236 0 Total Current Service Charges 688,346 660,955 1,165,494 1,067,390 1,065,345 2,045- 3900 Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 199 0 554 500 500 0 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 178- 11,873 21,405 0 0 0 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrt 0 = revenue Page: 4 di 11 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev vVorKsneet 02+05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH '001 General Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3903 Contributions Non Govt 62,280 39,540 42,605 5,000 62,280 57,280 3904 General Miscellaneous 4,683 5,436 40,043 0 4,683 4,683 3909 Late Fee 202 25 97 100 202 102 3935 Use Of PERS Excess Assets 160,727 158,371 312,753 328,492 328,492 0 3945 In-Sery FirefighterTmg Prog/EI Camino 6,134 11,064 16,905 18,207 13,250 4,957- • Total Other Revenue 234,047 226,309 434,362 352,299 409,407 57,108 Total General Fund 7,272,288 7,416,051 16,512,671 16,138,173 16,565,710 427,537 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 5 I v revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev vvorKsneet 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH I CAU V 105 Liahtp/Landscape Dist Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 181,800 181,651 447,499 447,000 447,000 0 3103 Prior Year Collections 3,708 5,106 10,318 12,000 12,000 0 3105 Assessment Rebates 492- 468- 3,027- 3,100- 3,100- 0 Total Taxes 185,016 186,289 454,790 455,900 455,900 0 fip Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 481 1,8866,187 4,332 1,977 2,355- 3450 Investment Discount 0 10 10 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 54- 144- 260- 147- 93- 54 Total Use Of Money & Property 427 1,752 5,937 4,185 1,884 2,301 - Total Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 185,443 188,041 460,727 460,085 457,784 2,301 - Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 6 /3 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev WorKsneet 02"05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH r 09c. 1 '109 Downtown Enhancement Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 5,125 7,115 22,944 16,690 19,363 2,673 3420 Other Interest Income 8,013 6,891 16,529 15,898 15,898 0 3425 Ground Lease 10,500 10,500 21,000 21,000 21,000 0 3450 Investment Discount 0 27 27 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 426- 548- 948- 565- 794- 229- 0 Total Use Of Money & Property 23,212 23,985 59,552 53,023 55,467 2,444 3800 Current Service Charges 3815 Public Works Services 2,675 0 4,825 3,900 3,900 0 3844 Lot A Revenue 126,485 117,745 237,931 302,000 302,000 0 3846 North Pier Parking Structure Revenue 309,078 251,320 532,110 676,500 676,500 0 Total Current Service Charges 438,238 369,065 774,866 982,400 982,400 0 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0 9,900 9,900 0 0 0 3903 Contributions Non Govt 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 Total Other Revenue 10,000 9,900 9,900 0 10,000 10,000 Total Downtown Enhancement Fund 471,450 402,950 844,318 1,035,423 1,047,867 12,444 • Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyr1 0 = revenue Page: 7 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Key vvorksneet 0210512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 110 Parking Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3302 Court Fines/Parking Total Fines & Forfeitures 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 4.3 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property 3800 Current Service Charges 3842 Parking Meters 623,775 529,960 1,082,058 1,344,584 1,344,584 0 3843 Parking Permits/Annual 23,493 26,353 304,805 290,000 300,000 10,000 3844 Daily Parking Permits 450 366 624 578 700 122 3848 Driveway Permits 257 222 476 400 400 0 3849 Guest Permits 1,182 1,086 1,926 1,600 1,900 300 3850 Contractors Permits 6,453 5,133 11,694 9,000 12,000 3,000 3851 Cash Key Revenue 2,080 670 2,300 1,310 3,000 1,690 617,086 582,002 1,099,447 1,193,135 1,193,135 0 617,086 582,002 1,099,447 1,193,135 1,193,135 0 2,858 3,502 10,258 6,691 8,455 1,764 0 17 17 0 0 0 194- 286- 438- 226- 338- 112- 2,664 3,233 9,837 6,465 8,117 1,652 Total Current Service Charges 657,690 563,790 1,403,883 1,647,472 1,662,584 15,112 0 Other Revenue 04 General Miscellaneous 0 0 205 0 0 0 Total Other Revenue 0 0 205 0 0 0 Total Parking Fund 1,277,440 1,149,025 2,513,372 2,847,072 2,863,836 16,764 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyri 0 = revenue Page: 8 /S revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Kev Vvorksneet 02105/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH r ayc 115 State Gas Tax Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 94 836 1,899 1,936 94 1,842- 3450 Investment Discount 0 3 3 0 _ 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 40- 62- 96- 66- 40- 26 Total Use Of Money & Property 54 777 1,806 1,870 54 1,816- 3500 I ntergovemmental/State III Section 2106 Allocation 37,916 38,769 74,85276,257 76,257 0 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 82,179 82,738 157,251 158,646 158,646 0 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 0 3512 Section 2105 (Prop 111) 60,923 61,811 118,610 118,248 118,248 0 3552 AB2928/Traffc Congestion Relief 0 6,556 49,602 0 0 0 Total Intergovernmental/State 185,018 193,874 404,315 357,151 357,151 0 Total State Gas Tax Fund • 185,072 194,651 406,121 359,021 357,205 1,816 - Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 9 Ib revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksheet 02/0512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH rout. iv 117 AB939 Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 2,820 3,904 12,713 9,037 10,222 1,185 3450 Investment Discount 0 14 14 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 187- 289- 516- 306- 378- 72 - Total Use Of Money & Property 2,633 3,629 12,211 8,731 9,844 1,113 0 Current Service Charges 3860 AB939 Surcharge 24,481 15,905 58,654 59,020 59,020 0 Total Current Service Charges 24,481 15,905 58,654 59,020 59,020 0 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0 0 4,059 0 0 0 Total Other Revenue 0 0 4,059 0 0 0 Total AB939 Fund 27,114 19,534 74,924 67,751 68,864 1,113 Note' = Memorandum Budge fit Format Name(s): S = mdyrt 0 = revenue Page: 10 17 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev WorKsneet 0:405/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH I- QUO. .I '120 County Gas Tax Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1 33 33 33 1 32- 3475 Investment Premium 0 2- 2- 0 0 0 Total Use Of Money & Property 1 31 31 33 1 32 - Total County Gas Tax Fund 1 31 31 33 1 32- • • Note • = Memorandum Budge Page: 11 Format Name(s): S = mdyr1 0 = revenue I revflex.rpt YUU3-04 Miayear Key vvorKsneet 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 121 Prop A Open Space Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3600 I ntergovemmentaVCounty 3606 LA Co Parks/Pier Renovation 0 580- 580- 141,723 141,723 0 3608 Maintenance Allocation 0 0 20,557 20,557 20,557 0 Total IntergovemmentaVCounty 0 - 580- 19,977 162,280 162,280 0 • Total Prop A Open Space Fund 0 580- 19,977 162,280 162,280 0 Note' = Memorandum Budge a • Format Name(s): S =rdyr1 0 = revenue Page: 12 9 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev vvorKsneet 0210512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 122 Tyco Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 12,138 0 42,022 44,791 44,818 27 3426 Easement Agreement 0 1,900,000 1,900,000 275,000 275,000 0 3475 Investment Premium 985- 0 859- 1,516- 1,828- 312 - Total Use Of Money & Property 11,153 1,900,000 1,941,163 318,275 317,990 285 - Total Tyco Fund 11,153 1,900,000 1,941,163 318,275 317,990 285 - Note • = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 13 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksheet 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH rage. 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3100 Taxes 3116 Parks & Recreation Fadlity Tax 7,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 7,000 3,500 Total Taxes 7,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 7,000 3,500 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,248 6,201 14,757 14,111 4,292 9,819- 00 Investment Discount 0 23 23 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 103- 470- 730- 477- 182- 295 Total Use Of Money & Property 1,145 5,754 14,050 13,634 4,110 9,524- 3900 Other Revenue 3910 Park/Recreation In Lieu Fee 13,585 39,574 86,044 117,128 41,168 75,960 - Total Other Revenue 13,585 39,574 86,044 117,128 41,168 75,960 - Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 21,730 48,828 103,594 134,262 52,278 81,984 - Note * = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl O = revenue Page: 14 n i revflex.rpt 2003-U4 Midyear Rev vvorKsneel 0210512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Co • •126 4% Utility Users Tax Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 254 3,513 7,670 7,742 770 6,972- 3450 Investment Discount 0 12 12 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 24- 256- 395- 262- 37- 225 Total Use Of Money & Property 230 3,269 7,287 7,480 733 6,747 - Total 4% Utility Users Tax Fund 230 3,269 7,287 7,480 733 6,747- • Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyr1 0 = revenue Page: 15 as revflex.rpt 2003-114 Mlayear Rev vvortesneet 0210512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ..y• 127 Building Improvement Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 32 184 388 354 109 245- 3450 Investment Discount 0 1 1 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 3- 13- 20- 13- 5- 8 Total Use Of Money & Property 29 172 369 341 104 237 - Total Building Improvement Fund 29 172 369 341 104 237 - Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 16 43 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Key woncsneet 02/0512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 136 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 2,807 2,775 2,775 2,775 2,807 32 Total Other Revenue 2,807 2,775 2,775 2,775 2,807 32 Total Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 2,807 2,775 2,775 2,775 2,807 32 • • Note • = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 17 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Key vyorKsneet 02/0512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 137 Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 36 51 248 150 139 11 - Total Use Of Money & Property 36 51 248 150 139 11- 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 9,083 8,629 8,629 8,629 9,083 454 • Total Other Revenue 9,083 8,629 8,629 8,629 9,083 454 Total Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund 9,119 8,680 8,877 8,779 9,222 443 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 18 As revfiex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksheet 020512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH r090. ro 138 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Total Use Of Money & Property 3800 Current Service Charges Total Current Service Charges 4111) Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees Total Other Revenue Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund • 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 47 68 313 202 202 0 47 68 313 202 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,920 9,563 9,563 9,563 9,920 357 9,920 9,563 9,563 9,563 9,920 357 9,967 9,631 9,876 9,765 10,122 357 Note • = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 19 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev WorKsneet 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 140 Community Dev Block Grant 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3700 I ntergovemmental/Federal 3715 CDBG Administration 4,361 0 12,321 11,609 11,609 0 3720 Americans with Disabilities Act 0 0 15,313 270,665 270,595 70- 3722 Community Center Theatre Phase I 9,181 0 9,061 112,274 150,000 37,726 3723 Community Center Theatre/Phase II 0 0 0 104,500 192,335 87,835 • Total Intergovernmental/Federal 13,542 0 36,695 499,048 624,539 125,491 Total Community Dev Block Grant 13,542 0 36,695 499,048 624,539 125,491 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue a7 Page: 20 revflex:rpt 2003=04 Midyear Rev WorKsneet 02)0512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 145 Proposition A Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3100 Taxes 3117 Proposition A Transit 107,626 127,082 251,942 265,406 265,406 0 3121 Subregional Incentives 10,680 15,305 37,395 29,584 29,584 0 Total Taxes 118,306 142,387 289,337 294,990 294,990 0 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3 01 Interest Income 1,081 1,734 5,918 4,155 3,789 366 - Investment Discount 0 6 6 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 82- 130- 236- 141- 152- 11 - Total Use Of Money & Property 999 1,610 5,688 4,014 3,637 377- 3800 Current Service Charges 3853 Dial -A -Taxi Program 1,961 1,440 3,180 3,000 4,000 1,000 3854 Fares, Dial -A -Ride 2,808 2,996 10,899 11,250 11,250 0 3855 Bus Passes 82 168 302 300 300 0 Total Current Service Charges 4,851 4,604 14,381 14,550 15,550 1,000 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0 0 707 0 0 0 Total Other Revenue 0 0 707 0 0 0 • Total Proposition A Fund 124,156 148,601 310,113 313,554 314,177 623 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyll1 0 = revenue Page: 21 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksheet 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH r aya. ac 146 Proposition C Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 - 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3100 Taxes 3118 Proposition C Local Return 89,277 82,227 208,939 217,781 217,781 0 Total Taxes 89,277 82,227 208,939 217,781 217,781 0 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 5,155 6,710 22,403 15,583 18,877 3,294 It Investment Discount 0 23 23 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 403- 491- 905- 528- 757- 229 - Total Use Of Money & Property 4,752 6,242 21,521 15,055 18,120 3,065 Total Proposition C Fund 94,029 88,469 230,460 232,836 235,901 3,065 • Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = md1 0 = revenue Page: 22 revflqx.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksheet 02105/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH r a9G. Lo 150 Grants Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3500 IntergovemmentaVState 3529 Wildlife Conservation Grant 0 0 0 324,000 324,000 0 3543 Per Capita Grant 0 0 178,000 0 0 0 3544 Roberti-Z'Berg Grant 0 057,214 0 0 0 3545 Coastal Conservancy Grant 0 52,198 52,198 0 0 0 3546 Coastal Authority Grant 0 0 356 0 0 0 3558 Beverage Recycling Grant 5,406 10,730 10,730 5,406 5,406 0 • GF 19-122Nalley Park Renovation 0 068,950 0 0 0 3562 State Homeland Security Grant Program 0 0 0 25,683 25.683 0 Total Intergovernmental/State 5,40662,928 367,448 355,089 355,089 0 3700 IntergovemmentaVFederal 3732 STPL Street Improvement Reimb • 0 0 87 0 0 0 3737 Ofc of Justice Programs Fed Equip Grant 0 0 4,562 0 0 0 3738 Local Law Ent Block Grant Prog-LLEBG 11,450 0 0 11,450 11,450 0 3739 Assistance to Firefighters Fed Grant 0 0 0 0 47,700 47,700 Total Intergovernmental/Federal 11,450 0 4,649 11,450 59,150 47,700 3900 Other Revenue 3930 BCHD Dom Violence Advocacy Grant 0 980 4,391 0 0 0 • Total Other Revenue 0 980 4,391 0 0 0 Total Grants Fund 16,856 63.908 376,488 366,539 414,239 47,700 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 23 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksheet 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH r4lc 151 Ofc of Traffic Sftv Grant Fund 2003-04 Account Number Thru Dec 03 3500 I ntergovemmental/State 3560 Be Street Smart Hermosa Grant Total IntergovemmentatfState Total Ofc of Traffic Sfty Grant Fund 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 4,409 0 57,310 18,000 15,441 2,559- 4,409 0 57,310 18,000 15,441 2,559- 4,409 0 57,310 18,000 15,441 2,559 - Note = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl O = revenue Page: 24 31 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksheet 0210512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH rays. 152 Air Quality Mamt Dist Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 8 467 1,185 1,096 8 1,088- 3450 Investment Discount 0 2 2 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium - 3- 34- 58- 38- 3- 35 Total Use Of Money & Property 5 435 1,129 1,058 5 1,053- 3 0 Intergovernmental/State iiiAQMD Emission Control AB2766 5,609 5,561 22,074 22,000 22,000 0 Total Intergovernmental/State 5,609 5,561 22,074 22,000 22,000 0 Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 5,614 5,996 23,203 23,058 22,005 1,053- • Note = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrt 0 = revenue Page: 25 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev WorKsneet 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 153 Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3100 Taxes 3135 C.O.P.S. Allocation Total Taxes 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3 01 Interest Income Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property Total Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 626 609 3,899 2,764 3,076 312 0 3 3 0 0 0 60- 74- 151- 94- 123- 29- 566 538 3,751 2,670 2,953 283 100,566 100,538 103,751 102,670 102,953 283 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrt_ 0 = revenue Page: 26 revflex rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksneet 02)05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 154 CA Law Enf Equip Prop Fund (CLEEP) Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 292 671 2,071 1,662 1,118 544- 3450 Investment Discount 0 2 2 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 25- 50- 85- 56- 46- 10 Total Use Of Money & Property 267 623 1,988 1,606 1,072 534- 3500 Intergovernmental/State • CLEEP High Technology Grant 0 18,181 18,181 0 0 0 Total Intergovernmental/State 0 18,181 18,181 0 0 0 Total CA Law Enf Equip Prog Fund (CLEEP) 267 18,804 20,169 1,606 1,072 534- • Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = and rt . 0 = revenue Page: 27 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev VvorKsneet 02105/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 156 Taskforce for Rep Autotheft Prev (TRAP) 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3600 Intergovemmental/County 3620 T.R.A.P. Taskforce Reimbursement Total I ntergovemmental/County 0 0 38,026 148,200 148,200 0 0 0 38,026 148,200 148,200 0 3900 Other Revenue • Total Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prev (TRAP) 0 0 38,026 148,200 148,200 0 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyr1 0 revenue Page: 28 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Miayear Rev vvorKsneet 0210512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH '160 Sewer Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 12,651 36,933 111,860 84,956 43,887 41,069- 3450 Investment Discount 0 134 134 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 1,078- 2,737- 4,770- 2,877- 1,884- 993 Total Use Of Money & Property 11,573 34,330 107,224 82,079 42,003 40,076- 3500 I ntergovemmental/State • CA Waste Oil Recycling Grant 4,877 7,857 7,898 5,419 5,419 0 Total IntergovemmentaVState 4,877 - 7,857 7,898 5,419 5,419 0 3600 I ntergovemmentaVCounty 3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance 0 851 3,943 2,500 2,500 0 Total IntergovemmentaVCounty 0 851 3,943 2,500 2,500 0 3800 Current Service Charges 3828 Sewer Connection Fee 5,079 4,965 13,286 7,670 7,670 0 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 4,011 7,173 11,757 6,000 6,000 0 3832 Sewer Lateral Installation 3,820 1,719 5,730 7,000 7,000 0 Total Current Service Charges 12,910 13,857 30,773 20,670 20,670 0 3900 Other Revenue • Adopt -A -Storm Drain Donation 3,680 0 960 4,000 8,896 4,896 Total Other Revenue 3,680 0 960 4,000 8,896 4,896 Total Sewer Fund - 33,040 56,895 150,798 114,668 79,488 35,180 - Note • 5,180• Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 29 36 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksneet 02105/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3304 State Forfeited Funds 89 109 225 0 200 200 3307 Department of Justice Forfeited Funds 781 893 1,302 0 1,500 1,500 3308 Department of Treasury Forfeited Funds 0 0 22 0 0 0 Total Fines & Forfeitures 870 1,002 1,549 0 1,700 1,700 • Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,142 1,760 5,641 4,075 4,134 59 3450 Investment Discount 0 6 6 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 91- 131- 231- 138- 168- 30 - Total Use Of Money & Property 1,051 1,635 5,416 3,937 3,966 29 Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 1,921 2,637 6,965 3,937 5,666 1,729 • Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 30 revflex.rpt 2UO3-04 Midyear Rev vvorKsneet 02(0512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH '180 Fire Protection Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3,129 4,665 15,032 10,926 11,202 276 3450 Investment Discount 0 17 17 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 244- 352- 621- 370- 453- 83 - Total Use Of Money & Property 2,885 4,330 14,428 10,556 10,749 193 3900 Other Revenue • Fire Flow Fee 41,409 45,305 86,800 67,200 67,200 0 Total Other Revenue 41,409 45,305 86,800 67,200 67,200 0 Total Fire Protection Fund 44,294 49,635 101,228 77,756 77,949 193 • Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrlg0 = revenue Page: 31 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear key vvorKsneet 02/0512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 199 Contingency Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property • Total Contingency Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 16,657 23,123 74,139 52,437 64,014 11,577 1,368- 0 1,042- 1,776- 2,590- 814- 15,289 23,123 73,097 50,661 61,424 10,763 15,289 23,123 73,097 50,661 61,424 10,763 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 32 revflex.rpt 'CUU.1-04 INIOyear Kev vvorKStreet 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 301 Capital Improvement Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 11,310 21,376 63,184 47,848 45,564 2,284- 3450 Investment Discount 0 72 72 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 1,002- 1,530- 2,650- 1,621- 1,886- 265 - Total Use Of Money & Property 10,308 19,918 60,606 46,227 43,678 2,549- 3900 Other Revenue • General Miscellaneous 0 0 3,670 0 0 0 Total Other Revenue 0 0 3,670 0 0 0 Total Capital Improvement Fund 10,308 19,918 64,276 46,227 43,678 2,549- • Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 33 40 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksneet 02/0512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH r a9c. .S+ 302 Artesia Blvd Relinquishment 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3,475 5,061 16,180 11,707 12,632 925 3450 Investment Discount 0 18 18 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 272- 189- 478- 396- 508- 112 - Total Use Of Money & Property 3,203 4,890 15,720 11,311 12.124 813 Total Artesia Blvd Relinquishment 3,203 4,890 15,720 11,311 12,124 813 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyr)o = revenue Page: 34 / revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev WorKsneet 02105/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH r 09C. JJ 305 Lwr Pier Assmnt Dist Impr Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money 8 Property 3401 Interest Income 467 687 2,196 1,587 1,705 118 3450 Investment Discount 0 3 3 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 37- 51- 90- 53- 69- 16 - Total Use Of Money 8 Property 430 639 2,109 1,534 1,636 102 • Total Lwr Pier Assmnt Dist Impr Fund • 430 639 2,109 1,534 1,636 102 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 = revenue Page: 35 I revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev WorKsneet 02)05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH r (AUG'. ..i 307 Myrtle Util Undrurnd Imola Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 32 185 592 436 135 301- 3450 Investment Discount 0 1 1 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 4- 14- 25- 15- 7- 8 Total Use Of Money & Property 28 172 568 421 128 293- 0 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0 0 1,149 0 0 0 Total Other Revenue 0 0 1,149 0 0 0 Total Myrtle Util Undrgmd Impr Fund 28 172 1,717 421 128 293 - Note * = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyr1 a= revenue Page: 36 revflex.rpt 2003-U4 Midyear Rev VVorKsneet 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 308 Loma Util Undrarnd Improv Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 665 972 3,096 2,229 2,419 190 3450 Investment Discount 0 4 4 0 0 0 3475 Investment Premium 52- 72- 127- 74- 97- 23 - Total Use Of Money & Property 613 904 2,973 2,155 2,322 167 . Total Loma Util Undrgmd Improv Fund • 613 904 2,973 2,155 2,322 167 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrt - O; revenue Page: 37 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksheet 02105/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH rage. ao 610 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Total Use Of Money & Property Total Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund 39 56 598 326 245 39 56 598 326 245 39 56 598 326 245 81- 81- 81 - Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyr1,72,pvenue Page: 38 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev WorKsneet dro 120b4 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 617 Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Total Use Of Money & Property Total Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 202 396 1,975 1,265 1,027 238- 202 396 1,975 1,265 1,027 238- 202 396 1,975 1,265 1,027 238 - Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl O =revenue - Page: 39 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksheet 0210512004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH rays. -tu 618 Loma Drive Assessment Fund Account Number 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 179 366 2,061 1,286 978 308 - Total Use Of Money & Property 179 366 2,061 1,286 978 308 - Total Lorna Drive Assessment Fund 179 366 2,061 1,286 978 308- • • Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 47.1/venue Page: 40 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Rev Worksheet 02/05/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH rage. de 705 Insurance Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3800 Current Service Charges 3880 Insurance Service Charges 706,404 641,568 1,283,133 1,412,810 1,412,810 0 Total Current Service Charges 706,404 641,568 1283,133 1,412,810 1,412,810 0 3900 Other Revenue 3902 RefundslReimb Previous Years 13,658 10 5,180 0 13,658 13,658 4 General Miscellaneous 1,225 0 0 0 1,225 1,225 Total Other Revenue 14,883 10 5,180 0 14,883 14,883 Total Insurance Fund 721,287 641,578 1,288,313 1,412,810 1,427,693 14,883 Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyrl 0 revenue Page: 41 revflex.rpt 2003-04 Midyear Key vvoncsneet 02105/2004 6:34AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 2003-04 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Increase Account Number Thru Dec 03 Thru Dec 02 Thru Year -End Revised Budget Dept Revision (Decrease) 3800 Current Service Charges 3885 Computer/Business Machine Charges 241,632 210,588 421,178 483,259 483,259 0 3889 Equipment Replacement Charges 341,124 315,168 630,347 682,652 682,652 0 Total Current Service Charges 582,756 525,756 1,051,525 1,165,911 1,165,911 0 00 Other Revenue 1 Sale of ReaVPersonal Property 7,413 0 0 10,000 10,000 0 Total Other Revenue 7,413 0 0 10,000 10,000 0 1,051,525 1,175,911 1,175,911 0 590 169 Total Equipment Replacement Fund525,756 Grand Total 11254,284 13,096,339 26,865,652 26,157,294 26,685,599 528,305 • Note' = Memorandum Budge Format Name(s): S = mdyr1 O = revenue Page: 42 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04 GENERAL FUND 001 LIGHTING LANDSCAPING FUND 105 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 109 PARKING FUND 110 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovemmental/State Intergovernmental/County Intergovemmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/03 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $13,153,986 $547,238 $280,000 $274,188 $835,546 $0 $0 $1,065,345 $409,407 $16,565,710 $2,054,701 $18,620,411 $455,900 $0 $0 $1,884 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $457,784 $7,781 $465,565 $692,816 $167,077 $19,313,227 5632,642 $17,567,555 $65,281 $415,074 r $18,047,910 $1,139,586 $19,187A96 $565,655 $0 $0 $565,655 $20,463 $586,118 $0 $0 $0 $55,467 $0 $0 $0 $982,400 $10,000 $1,047,867 $1,285 $1,049,152 $7,335,531 $8,384,683 $1,052,414 $0 $287,502 $1,339,916 $3,334 $1,343,250 $0 $0 $1,193,135 $8,117 $0 $0 $0 $1,662,584 $0 $2,863,836 $21,570 $2,885,406 $241,684 $3,127,090 $1,702,121 $0 $9,592 I $1,711,713 $1,227,575 $2,939,288 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/04 (a) $125,731 $46,524 (b) $7,041,433 (c) $187,802 (a) DESIGNATIONS/RESERVES OF FUND BALANCE: Affordable Housing $111,831 $3,900 $10.000 $125,731 Trash Containers/Downtown Teen Program/Climbing Wall (Decision Pending) Funding carried forward from 02-03 ,so (b) Investment In (c) Investment In Fixed Assets Fixed Assets $6,487,766 $187,802 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04 COMPENSATED COUNTY PROP A STATE GAS AB 939 ABSENCES GAS TAX OPEN SPACE TAX FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND 115 117 119 120 121 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State Intergovemmental/County Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 $54 $357,151 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,844 $0 $0 $0 $59,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $162,280 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $357,205 $68,864 $0 $1 $162,280 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $236 $95,859 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $357,205 $69,100 $95,859 $1 $162,280 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/03 $3,591 $409,408 $333,164 $152 $2 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $360,796 $478,508 $429,023 $153 $162,282 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $0 $56,959 $0 $0 $0 Capital Outlay $0 $156,560 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,723 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 $213,519 $0 $0 $141,723 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $355,488 $0 $148,972 $0 $20,557 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $355,488 $213,519 $148,972 $0 $162,280 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/04 $5,308 (d) $264,989 $280,051 $153 $2 (d) RESERVES: Transportation Development Act • Local $655 (TDA Regional $2,936 5/ 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04 TYCO FUND 122 PARK/ RECREATION FACILITY TAX FUND 125 4% UTILITY USER TAX RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND 126 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 127 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property IntergovemmentaVState Intergovemmental/County Intergovemmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/03 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT 30 50 30 $317,990 30 30 50 $0 30 57,000 50 50 $4,110 30 $0 50 50 $41,168 3317,990 $52,278 30 30 $317,990 $52,278 31,908,180 3173,790 52,226,170 3226,068 30 $0 31,866,899 51,866,899 $275,000 32,141,899 52,500 30 3182,768 3185,268 540,800 5226,068 30 30 30 3733 50 30 30 30 30 3733 50 3733 $16,402 $17,135 30 30 30 30 $0 30 30 30 30 $104 30 30 30 30 30 $104 50 3104 $4,572 34,676 30 30 $0 50 $0 50 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/04 384,271 30 517,135 $4,676 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04 LOWER PIER MYRTLE DISTRICT LOMA DISTRICT COMMUNITY ADMINISTRATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE BLOCK GRANT FUND FUND FUND FUND 136 137 138 140 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovemmental/State IntergovemmentaVCounty IntergovemmentaVFederat Current Service Charges Other Revenue 50 50 50 $0 50 50 50 5139 50 50 50 $0 50 50 - 50 50 52,807 59.083 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 52,807 59.222 510,122 5624.539 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 50 $0 50 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE 52,807 59,222 510,122 $624,539 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/03 5263 56,094 58,579 $70 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 53,070 515,316 518,701 5624,609 $0 50 50 5202 50 $0 50 50 59,920 50 50 50 50 $0 50 5624,539 50 50 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget 51,763 55.718 Capital Outlay 50 50 Capital Improvements 50 50 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 51,763 55,718 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT 51,021 52.959 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT 52,784 58,677 56,200 511,609 50 50 50 $613,000 56,200 5624,609 $3,382 $0 59,582 5624,609 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30104 $286 $6,639 $9,119 $0 53 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04 PROPOSITION PROPOSITION OFC OF TRAFFIC "A" "C" GRANTS SAFETY GRANT FUND FUND FUND FUND 145 146 150 151 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State Intergovemmental/County IntergovemmentaVFederal Current Service Charges Other Revenue $294,990 $0 $0 $3,637 $0 $0 $0 $15,550 $0 $217,781 $0 $0 $18,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $402,789 $0 $11,450 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $314,177 $235,901 $414,239 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $314,177 $235,901 $414,239 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,441 $0 $0 $0 $0 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/03 $136,650 $727,375 $10,663 $0 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $450,827 $963,276 $424,902 $15,441 APPROPRIATIONS • Operating Budget $311,090 $22,000 $100,902 $15,441 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $28,270 $324,000 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $311,090 $50,270 $424,902 $15,441 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $311,090 $50,270 $424,902 $15,441 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/04 $139,737 $913,006 $0 $0 59 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04 SUPPLEMENTAL CALIFORNIA TASKFORCE FOR AIR QUALITY LAW ENFORCEMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT REG AUTOTHEFT IMPROVEMENT SERVICES EQUIPMENT PROGRAM PREVENTION FUND FUND FUND FUND 152 153 154 156 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property IntergovemmentavState Intergovemmental/County IntergovemmentalFederal Current Service Charges Other Revenue 30 3100,000 30 $0 30 30 35 52,953 322,000 50 30 30 $0 30 30 $0 30 $0 30 30 30 31,072 30 30 30 30 $0 30 30 30 30 30 3148,200 30 30 30 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 322,005 3102,953 31,072 $148.200 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 30 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE 322,005 $102,953 31,072 $148,200 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1103 3773 3103,733 343,751 $0 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 322,778 $206,686 344,823 $148,200 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements 31,000 $42,000 $0 $148,200 30 380,000 $42,781 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 31,000 3122.000 $42,781 3148,200 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT 30 321,227 30 30 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT 31,000 $143,227 $42,781 $148,200 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/04 $21,778 $63,459 52,042 $0 55 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04 ASSET FIRE RETIREMENT SEWER FORFEITURE PROTECTION STABILIZATION CONTINGENCY FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND 160 170 180 198 199 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovemmental/State Intergovernmental/County IntergovemmentaVFederal Current Service Charges Other Revenue 50 30 30 30 50 30 30 30 30 $1,700 30 30 342,003 $3,966 $10,749 50 35,419 30 30 50 32,500 50 50 30 30 $0 30 30 320,670 30 30 30 38,896 30 367,200 30 $0 $0 $0 $61,424 30 $0 30 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 379,488 35,666 377,949 30 361,424 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 3716,622 30 30 $464.329 50 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE 3796,110 35,666 377,949 3464,329 361,424 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/03 32,173,576 $179,482 3479,122 30 52,942,179 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 32,969,686 3185,148 3557,071 3464,329 33,003,603 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget 3655,369 30 30 30 $0 Capita! Outlay 30 30 383,253 50 30 Capital Improvements 32,147,530 30 5121,717 30 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 32,802,899 50 5204,970 50 30 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT 50 540,500 $125,749 30 3368,470 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT 32,802,899 540,500 5330,719 30 $368,470 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/04 5166,787 3144,648 (e) 3226,352 5464,329 52,635,133 (e) DESIGNATIONS: Department of Justice Funds 317,370 Department of Treasury Funds 56 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04 LOWER PIER MYRTLE UTILITY CAPITAL ARTESIA BLVD AVENUE UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENT RELINQUISHMENT IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT FUND FUND FUND FUND 301 302 305 307 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property IntergovemmentaVState IntergovemmentatlCounty Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue $0 30 $0 $43,678 30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 312,124 $1,636 $0 $0 $0 30 $0 30 $0 30 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $43,678 $12,124 31,636 30 30 30 3128 30 30 $0 $0 30 3128 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 5370,859 30 30 30 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE 3414,537 312,124 51,636 3128 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/03 32,413,889 $510,961 $69,366 39,803 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 32,828,426 3523,085 371,002 39,931 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget 30 30 $0 $0 Capital Outlay 30 30 30 30 Capital Improvements $1,644,259 30 $0 35,440 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 31,644,259 30 $0 35,440 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT 30 30 30 30 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT 31,644,259 30 $0 35,440 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/04 31,184,167 3523,085 371,002 34,491 S� CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04 LOMA UTILITY BAYVIEW DRIVE BONNIE BRAE BEACH DRIVE UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT FUND FUND FUND FUND 308 309 310 311 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovemmentat/State IntergovemmentaVCounty Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue 50 50 50 $2,322 $0 $0 50 50 50 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 52,322 50 $0 50 50 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 50 50 $0 50 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 50 $0 50 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE 52,322 50 50 50 $0 $0 50 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/03 598,413 (530,000) ($50,000) (523,724) TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $100,735 ($30,000) (550,000) (523,724) APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OLT 50 50 $0 50 50 50 50 50 50 58,000 $0 $4,276 50 58,000 $0 54,276 50 $0 $0 50 58,000 50 $0 54,276 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 5/30/04 $100,735 (538,000) ($50,000) (528,000) 58 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04 PROSPECT LOWER PIER .MYRTLE LOMA UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT AVENUE DRIVE DISTRICT REDEMPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FUND FUND FUND FUND 312 610 617 618 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovemmentat/State Intergovemmental/County Intergovemmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue 50 $0 50 50 50 50 50 5245 50 50 50 50 50 50 $0 50 50 50 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 50 5245 $0 $0 50 51,027 $0 50 50 $0 $0 50 50 50 $978 $0 50 $0 50 $0 51,027 5978 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 50 $0 50 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE 50 5245 $1,027 $978 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/03 50 54,447 514,837 513,167 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 50 54,692 515.864 514,145 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget 50 50 50 Capital Outlay 50 50 50 Capital Improvements 5200,000 50 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 5200,000 $0 50 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT 50 50 50 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $200,000 50 50 $o $0 $o $o $o $o ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6130/04 ($200,000) $4,692 515,864 514,145 59 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2003-04 EQUIPMENT INSURANCE REPLACEMENT TOTAL FUND FUND (MEMORANDUM 705 715 ONLY) ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State IntergovemmentaVCounty Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 $o $0 SO $o 51,412,810 $14,883 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 51,165,911 $10,000 514,229,657 $547,238 51,474,835 $878,900 51,638,346 5312,980 5635,989 $6,384,290 $583,364 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 51,427,693 51,175,911 $26,685,599 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 598,411 $27,331 $3,858,984 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $1,526,104 $1,203,242 $30,544,583 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/03 $1,743,941 $4,613,962 $27,487,741 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $3,270,045 $5,817,204 $58,032,324 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget 51,415,362 51,099,417 524,783,275 Capital Outlay $0 $674,130 $1,102,005 Capital Improvements $0 $0 $8,000,050 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $1,415,362 $1,773,547 $33,885,330 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $63,901 $3,858,984 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $1,415,362 $1,837,448 $37,744,314 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/04 $1,854,683 $3,979,756 (f) $20,288,010 (f) Investment In Fixed Assets $2,676,002 60 • • INTERFUND TRANSFERS Midyear 2003-04 TRANSFERS IN TRANSFERS OUT GENERAL FUND From Lighting/Landscaping Fund, Administration $20,463 From Downtown Enhancement Fund, Administration $3,334 From Parking Fund, Unused Fund Balance 51,227,575 From State Gas Tax Fund, Street Maintenance, Traffic Safety Operations $355,488 From Compensated Absences Fund, Retirement Cashouts 5148.972 From Prop A Open Space Fund, Parks Maintenance Allocation $20,557 From Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund, Upgrade classrooms for dance classes 515,000 From Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund, Replace skate track fence $2,000 From Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund, Replace Lawnbowling green fence $4,300 From Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund, Replace tables & chairs - Recreation facilities $10,000 From Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund, Theatre lighting equipment $1,500 From Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund, Historical Society Donation 58,000 From Fire Protection Fund, Fire Equipment Replacement Charges $125,749 From Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund, Agency Administration $1,021 From Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund, Agency Administration 52,959 From Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund, Agency Administration $3,382 From Asset Seizure Fund, Heating & Air Conditioning Modifications at the Police Department 540,500 From Equipment Replacement Fund, Additonal funding for Permitting Software 559,901 From Equipment Replacement Fund, Council Media System Maintenance $4,000 To Sewer Fund, Improvements $700,000 To Lighting/Landscaping Fund, MOU Increases $7,781 To Downtown Enhancement Fund, MOU Increases $1,285 To Parking Fund, MOU Increases $21,570 To AB939 Fund, MOU Increases $236 To Sewer Fund, MOU Increases $16,622 To Compensated Absences Fund, Unexpended Balance transfer $95,859 To Retirement Stabilizaton Fund, Unexpended Balance transfer $95,859 To Capital Improvement Fund, Unexpended Balance transfer $95,859 To Insurance Fund, Unexpended Balance transfer $95,859 To Insurance Fund, MOU Increases $2,552 To Equipment Replacement Fund, MOU Increases 56,104 FUND TOTALS $2,054,701 $1,139,586 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING FUND From General Fund, MOU Increases To General Fund, Administration FUND TOTALS $7,781 $7,781 520,463 $20,463 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND From General Fund, MOU Increases $1.285 To General Fund, Administration $3,334 FUND TOTALS $1,285 53,334 PARKING FUND From Parking Fund, MOU Increases 521,570 To General Fund, Unused Fund Balance $1227,575 FUND TOTALS $21,570 $1,227,575 STATE GAS TAX FUND To General Fund, Street Maintenance, Traffic Safety Operations $355,488 FUND TOTALS $0 $355,488 s • • INTERFUND TRANSFERS Midyear 2003-04 AB939 FUND From General Fund, MOU Increases FUND TOTALS COMPENSATED ABSENCES FUND TRANSFERS IN TRANSFERS OUT $236 $0 $236 $0 To General Fund, Retirement Cashouts $148,972 From General Fund, Unexpended Balance transfer 595,859 FUND TOTALS $95,859 $148,972 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND To General Fund, Parks Maintenance Allocation TYCO FUND To Capital Improvement Fund, Street Improvements PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 520,557 FUND TOTALS $0 $20,557 $275,000 FUND TOTALS $0 5275,000 To General Fund, Upgrade classrooms for dance classes 515,000 To Genera! Fund, Replace skate track fence $2,000 To General Fund, Replace Lawnbowling green fence $4.300 To General Fund, Replace tables & chairs - Recreation facilities $10,000 To General Fund, Theatre lighting equipment $1,500 To General Fund, Historical Society Donation $8,000 FUND TOTALS $0 540,800 LOWER PIER ADMIN EXPENSE FUND To General Fund, Agency Administration MYRTLE DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE FUND To General Fund, Agency Administration LOMA DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE FUND To General Fund, Agency Administration SUPP LAW ENF SERVICES (COPS) FUND $1,021 FUND TOTALS $0 $1,021 $2,959 FUND TOTALS $0 $2,959 $3,382 FUND TOTALS $0 $3,382 To Equipment Replacement Fund, Motorcycle Purchase -CC 10/28/03 $21,227 FUND TOTALS $0 $21,227 SEWER FUND From General Fund, Improvements 5700,000 $0 From General Fund, MOU Increases $16,622 FUND TOTALS $716,622 $0 6.2 • s INTERFUND TRANSFERS Midyear 2003-04 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND To General Fund, Heating & Air Conditioning Modifications at the Police Department FIRE PROTECTION FUND To General Fund, Fire Equipment Replacement Charges FUND TOTALS FUND TOTALS TRANSFERS IN TRANSFERS OUT $40500 $0 $40,500 $0 $125,749 $0 $125,749 RETIREMENT STABILIZATION FUND From Contingency Fund, Transfer excess over goal $368,470 From General Fund, Unexpended Balance transfer $95,859 $0 FUND TOTALS $464,329 $0 CONTINGENCY FUND To Retirement Stabilization Fund, Transfer excess over goal CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND From Tyco Fund, Street Improvements From General Fund, Unexpended Balance transfer INSURANCE FUND From General Fund, MOU Increases From General Fund, Unexpended Balance transfer FUND TOTALS $0 $368,470 $0 $368,470 $275,000 $0 $95,859 $0 FUND TOTALS $370,859 $0 FUND TOTALS $2,552 $95,859 $98,411 $0 $0 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND From SLESF (COPS) Fund, Motorcycle Purchase -CC 10-28-03 $21,227 From General Fund, MOU Increases $6,104 To General Fund, Additonai funding for Permitting Software $59,901 To General Fund Fund, Council Media System Maintenance $4,000 FUND TOTALS $27,331 563,901 GRAND TOTALS 53,858,984 53,858,984 63 • • Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council REPORT ON THE STRAND BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT February 2, 2004 Regular meeting of February 10, 2004 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council: 1. Receive and file this report. 2. Consider enactment of any of the proposed recommendations in this report. BACKGROUND The Strand is a wide sidewalk that affronts the beach the entire length of Hermosa Beach. The Strand is wide enough for two vehicles to pass one another in both directions. The Strand has many uses that includes walking, running, rollerblading, skateboarding, walking leashed dogs and bicycling. The Strand becomes very congested during warm days especially on warm weekends that can and do occur all year round. There has been concern expressed by members of the community regarding the variety of uses of the Strand and in particular, bicyclists that travel too fast on the Strand for conditions. There are a variety of municipal code sections that regulate the uses of the Strand. In regards to wheeled vehicles, motorized bicycles and motor vehicles are prohibited on the Strand. (HBMC 12.20.220) Skateboards, rollerskates and pedal powered, non -motorized bicycles or tricycles are permitted on the Strand. (HBMC 12.20.224 and 12.20.230) There are subsections in 12.20.230 that deal with right of way, group and trick riding, speed and designated walk zones. Subsection (E) regulates dangerous speeds and designates a speed limit of 10 MPH on the Strand. Subsection (F) designates a "Walk Zone" for bicycles and skateboards from 10`h Street to 15th Street on the Strand. The walk zone is activated when an automatic timer tums on the flashing red lights on the weekends. ANALYSIS The Police Department has conducted a study of Strand Activities for the past few months. This has included the use of our "Stealth Radar" machine and the random observation and enforcement of the Strand throughout the week. The Stealth Radar was deployed on October 2-4, 2003 at 8'" and Strand. It was utilized two more times in December at 18th and Strand and 19`h and Strand on December 5-7, 12-14, 2003. Unfortunately, this radar unit along with all handheld radar units can only register moving vehicles at 11 MPH and above. In these surveys of the Strand, the radar would record anything, including pedestrians, traveling at 11 MPH or higher. The October survey recorded a total of 1653 vehicles with an average speed of 13.37 MPH. The December survey captured a total of 731 vehicles with an average speed of 13.36 MPH. The third survey recorded 1121 vehicles with an average speed of 13.29 MPH. There were vehicles recorded travelling between 15 MPH and 25 MPH. 6b • • The police department has conducted more directed patrols of the Strand in the past few weeks. Officers have been assigned to work the Strand at random times to observe conditions generally and to wam and advise persons travelling too fast for conditions. Officers have also monitored the walk zone and one citation was issued to a violator who was warned three times to dismount in the walk zone. The traffic officers were given the assignment of conducting daily speed surveys during the Christmas holiday season using hand-held radar units. Generally, most people observed were traveling at leisurely speeds of 6-10 miles per hour. Those traveling over 10 MPH were recorded between 11-13 MPH at most of the locations monitored. The north end of the Strand (around 30th Street) saw average speeds of 13-16 MPH. The Strand seems to self regulate itself. When the Strand is crowded most people slow down and/or walk their bikes because of conditions. When the Strand is less crowded or open, people will travel faster. The Fire Department compiled statistics over a five-year period (1998-2002) regarding accidents occurring on the Strand. (See attachment A) There were a total of 128 accidents during this period of time on the Strand that prompted a fire paramedic response. Of the 128 accidents, only 20 accidents or 15.6% Involved a bicyclist or skater versus another bicyclist, pedestrian or skater. Most of the accidents that occurred on the Strand were solo accidents (84.3%). It is also interesting to note that the number of accidents on the Strand have steadily declined over this five year period. (33 accidents in 1998 to 21 accidents in 2002) The Redondo and Manhattan Beach Police Departments were contacted regarding speed limits along the strands in their cities. The "bike path" in Redondo Beach south of the pier that affronts the beach (along the Esplanade) does not have a speed limit. There is a permanent walk zone through the Redondo Pier area but despite all of the signs and traffic calming measures, the zone still requires a great deal of enforcement. The Strand in Manhattan Beach does not have a speed limit and they do not have a walk zone as there is in Hermosa Beach. The police department does set up temporary "walk your bike" signs during busy beach days and special events at the Manhattan pierhead as needed. RECOMMENDATIONS It is the opinion of staff that the speeding on the Strand is not a major problem. While it certainly does occur, it does not occur to the extent that it might be perceived and has not resulted in numerous accidents and injuries. However, in reviewing the existing conditions on the Stand and the municipal code sections that regulate activities on the Strand, staff makes the following recommendations: • Eliminate the 10 MPH speed limit language in section 12.20.230 (E) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. This speed limit is very arbitrary. Based on experience and observations, there are times when 15 MPH would be safe and there are times when 8 MPH is too fast. There is very adequate language in Section 12.20.230 (E) to allow officers to cite violators that are traveling at unsafe speeds based upon existing conditions or for reckless and careless operation of any wheeled vehicle. Additionally, most officers are not equipped with radar. Radar is assigned to traffic officers who operate these units on public streets. Without a radar gun, an officer is left to his own observations and opinion as to what is over or under 10 MPH. This could prove difficult in court for an officer to testify as to an absolute speed. In the event that the Council does not wish to eliminate the speed limit, the signage along the Strand is very poor and needs to be improved for better visibility. • • • Reduce the walk -zone from the current 10t and 15th Streets to 11th and 14th Streets. Staff feels that this walk zone is too Targe and unreasonable. The areas in front of Noble Park and the Seasprite Hotel should not be apart of the walk zone. Staff also feels that the signage and lighting for the walk zone is poor and needs to be re -engineered for better visibility. The walk zone also creates some confusion for bicyclists and skateboarders that can ride legally on Pier Plaza yet illegally as they cross onto the Strand into the walk zone area. If this recommendation is adopted by Council, it will require a modification to Section 12.20.230 (F) of the Municipal Code by changing the language designating 10th to 15th Streets as the walk zone to 11th to 14th Streets. • Another altemative for the Council to consider is the total elimination of the walk zone from 11th to 15th Streets. The walk zone is difficult to enforce on a consistent basis. The police department does not have the resources to assign officers to this area on a regular basis. Fortunately, most people slow down and/or walk their bikes through this area when it is crowded. Thus the Strand is generally self regulating. The signage and lighting is confusing. While the locals might be familiar with the walk zone, people from out of town are completely confused. Additionally, as the red flashing lights are on a timer, the lights come on automatically even when the Strand is empty causing further confusion to users. Finally, there exists sufficient language in the Municipal Code to deal with speed issues along this area of the Strand. Section 12.20.230 (E) allows the police to cite violators observed anywhere on the Strand that are traveling either too fast for conditions or in a reckless and careless manner. Adoption of this recommendation will require the modification of Section 12.20.230 (F). If this option is chosen, It is further recommended that the main body of language in this section remain. Staff feels that it would be helpful for the Council to continue to designate temporary walk zones that could be useful in connection with certain events that take place along the Strand. The only language that would need to be eliminated is the last sentence of the section that designates the current walk zone (10th to 15th Streets). Respectfully submitted, Concur: MICHAEL HIEF OF POLICE STEPHEN BURRELL HERMOSA ,LII:%H POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY MANAGER ATTACHMENT A HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT RESPONSE TO STRAND ACCIDENTS 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Bike vs. Skater 4 1 0 0 1 Fall from Skates 13 13 4 5 4 Skater vs. Ped. 1 0 0 0 0 Bike vs. Ped. 2 1 2 2 1 Bike vs. Bike 3 1 0 1 0 Solo fall from Bike 5 8 10 7 5 Pedestrian Fall 3 1 6 4 1 Dog bite jogger 1 0 0 0 0 Fall from skateboard 1 2 1 3 5 Runner ill 0 0 1 0 0 Child fall from stroller 0 1 0 0 0 Walker ill 0 0 0 0 2 Dog bite -bicyclist 0 0 0 0 1 Dog bite -skater 0 0 0 0 1 12.20.160 • C. No person shall place any garbage or rubbish accumulating on any private premises in any public garbage or rubbish container or receptacle placed upon the beach or strand which has been furnished for the use of the general public. (Prior code § 5-17) 12.20.170 Hazardous areas --Designation. Whenever any lifeguard finds that because of extra high surf, riptide or other hazardous conditions, it is unsafe for the average person to swim or bathe within a certain area of the waters of the Pacific Ocean adjacent to the beach, during the time such hazardous conditions exist such lifeguard may instruct all persons not to swim or bathe in such area. Every person shall comply with such instructions. (Prior code § 5-18) 12.20.180 Inflated equipment. No person shall use in the Pacific Ocean adjacent to the beach any inflated equipment of any kind except a standards surf mat which is: A. Constructed of a durable material with a nonslippery surface; and B. So constructed that, when inflated for use, it will not fold in any direction; and C. Not smaller than twenty-four (24) inches by forty (40) inches; and D. Not larger than thirty (30) inches by sixty (60) inches; and E. Equipped with a safety rope. (Prior code § 5-19) 12.20.190 Lifeguards and police officers. No person shall fail or refuse to obey any reasonable command, order, instruction or direction of any lifeguard or police officer given in connection with or with reference to the use, operation, manipulation or handling of any boat, surfboard, paddleboard or other surf or wave riding equipment or device, or fail or refuse to remove the same from the surf or waters of the Pacific Ocean adjacent to the beach when requested to do so by any of such lifeguards or police officers. (Prior code § 5-21) 12.20.200 Lifesaving apparatus. No person shall unwind or remove or in any way tamper with a buoy or lifeline, or rope, reels or Supp. 9A (12100) • other paraphernalia connected with the lifesaving apparatus on any portion of the beach or strand or any lifeguard station or tower or similar facility except to use the same for the purpose for which they are intended, and only for the purpose of attempting to rescue or save any person in actual or apparent danger. (Prior code § 5-22) 12.20.210 Loitering. No person shall loiter on any portion of the beach or strand at any time during the hours of twelve midnight and six a.m.'of the following day. (Prior code § 5-23) C12.20.220 1 Motorized bicycles and motor. vehicles. No pedal -powered motorized bicycle, or motorized vehicle of any kind other than those used for the purpose of protecting life or property, shall be ridden, pedaled, walked, carried onto or otherwise enter any portion of the Strand walkway or beach at any time. A violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-24) 12.20.224 1 Designated recreational areas The following areas are designated recreational areas in which in-line skating is permitted: 1.. The Strand: and, 2. The bike path between 24th Street and the northern city limit. (Ord. 98-1183, Added, 09/10/98) 12.20.230 1 Wheeled vehicles or devices on Strand walkway. A. Prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to ride or operate any wagon, box on wheels, or any other method of riding or locomotion on wheels on any portion of the Strand walkway; except the following: 1. Roller skates; 2. Skateboards; 3. Pedal -powered, non -motorized bicycles or tricycles with a width of not more than thirty-six (36) inches used for recreational purposes; 4. Conveyances for persons unable to walk. (12-20) 4 • B. Required to Yield Right -of -Way to Pedestrians. Under all circumstances, the rider or operator of a wheeled vehicle or device, including bicycles, skateboards and roller skates, on the Strand walkway shall yield the right-of-way to pedestrians, and due and proper care shall at all times be exercised by the rider or operator for the pedestrians. C. Group Riding. When more than two persons in a group are riding or operating wheeled vehicles or devices, including bicycles, skateboards and roller skates, on the Strand walkway, no more than two shall ride side by side. D. Racing—Trick riding. It is unlawful for any person riding or operating any wheeled vehicle or device to race any other such vehicle or device or person along the Strand walkway, or to indulge in any kind of trick or unsafe riding or operating. E. Dangerous Speed—Penalty. It shall be deemed reckless and dangerous if any person rides or operates any wheeled vehicle or device permitted on the Strand walkway, including bicycles, skateboards and roller skates, in excess of ten miles per hour, at an unsafe speed under existing conditions, or operates such vehicle or device permitted on the Strand walkway in such a reckless, wanton or careless manner as to constitute unsafe riding or operating, and any person so operating or riding said vehicle or device shall be guilty of an infraction of the law as set forth in Sections 19c and 19d of the Penal Code of the state of California. F. Designated Walk Zones. The city council by a majority vote, may designate certain areas of the Strand walkway as hazardous for bicycling and skateboarding, based on appropriate studies and/or staff recommendations, and may designate those areas as walk zones by amendment to this subsection and ordering the placement of appropriate signs, barricades, markings, flashing lights, delineations or devices signifying "Walk Zone Ahead" at least fifty (50) feet prior to the designated zone; and the placement of appropriate regulatory signs at the beginning of the walk zone such as, "Walk Bikes and Skateboards when Flashing." The end of the walk zone shall be designated by signs indicating "resume riding beyond this point." It is unlawful to ride a bicycle • 12.20.230 or skateboard when the following designated walk zone is in effect: The Strand walkway between the centerline of 10th Street and 15th Street. G. Parking. No person operating any wheeled vehicle or device on the Strand walkway shall park said vehicle or device in front of any entrance to the public beach or to public or private property, or in any way hinder, delay or obstruct the movement of pedestrians or emergency vehicles or other wheeled vehicles or devices upon the surface of said walkway. H. Applicability of Traffic Regula- tions. Every person riding a bicycle on the Strand walkway shall be granted all the rights and be subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle by Title 10, except those provisions which by their very nature can have no application to such persons. I. Violation. Violation of any provision of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-24.5) 12.20.240 Overnight camping. No person shall camp on or use for overnight sleeping purposes any portion of the beach or strand, or bring a house trailer or similar vehicle onto the beach or strand, and a violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5- 25) 12.20.250 Pollution of water. A. Oil Pollution. No person shall deposit, throw, divert or in any manner dispose of, or cause or permit to be deposited, placed, thrown, diverted or in any manner disposed of within the city, any petroleum, refined petroleum, engine oil or any oily by-product thereof, or any tar or any product containing tar, or any oily substance into or upon the waters of the Pacific Ocean, or into or upon the waters of any lagoon, bay, inlet or tributary thereof; or shall deposit, throw, place, divert or in any manner dispose of, or cause or permit to be deposited, thrown, placed, diverted or in any manner disposed of, any crude petroleum, refined petroleum or any oily substance upon any beach, tideland, or submerged land or any portion thereof, within the city. (12-20) 5 Supp. SA (17100) • • TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: Jeff Duclos DATE: January 22, 2004 RE: REPORT ON THE STRAND BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT It is my understanding that discussion and action on agenda item 6c of the last City Council meeting has been deferred to the meeting of Tuesday, January 27, 2004. As a resident of Hermosa Beach (to be referred to as "the City"), I am adding my public comment on the memorandum by the Police Department regarding safety issues on the Strand and Police Chief Michael Lavin and City Manager Steve Burrell's recommendations regarding this issue. While I understand the principles behind the basic speed law, and the problems associated with enforcement of the posted speed limit on the Strand, I am troubled that the City's primary "safety" officer would propose the elimination of the posted 10 MPH speed limit as a measure to solve the problem of `wheels vs. heels" conflicts on the Strand, and for alleviating community concerns regarding safety issues caused by wheeled traffic speeding along this mixed use corridor. The Police Department's own monitoring has demonstrated that wheeled traffic on the Strand is moving at an average of more than 13 MPH, with some traffic traveling at as much as 25 MPH. Feeding into the Strand is more than a mile of narrow walk streets. Reaction time for wheeled traffic at speeds in excess of 10 MPH is reduced proportionate to the speed at which the traffic is traveling. This is a key consideration when establishing basic speed laws. Consider this scenario: Racing bike enthusiasts riding side by side on the Strand, two or more, with two or more riders right behind them at speeds in excess of 13 MPH. Not an uncommon sight. Now consider another scenario: A small child, entering the Strand from a walk street, breaks away from its parents, and runs out into this mixed use area. If such an event were to occur coincidental with one of these packs moving down the Strand, the danger is obvious -- regardless of the amount of activity on the Strand at the time. It is why I strongly disagree with the report's conclusion that there are times when 15 MPH is a safe speed on the Strand. It is a mixed use area where, by law, pedestrians have the right of way. If the City Council wants to deliver the appropriate message to wheeled traffic on the Strand, then I recommend considering lowering the speed limit to 8 MPH, which is consistent with the speed limit established by other beach communities, San Diego being an example, for mixed use paths along the beach. • • I also urge you to take the following actions: • Maintain or lower the posted speed limit on the Strand. Without a consistent presence of law enforcement on the Strand, a highly visible posted speed limit, and other signage, is the only restraint we have in controlling wheeled traffic. • The immediate readjustment of signage along the Strand. The Caltrans Traffic Manual recommends a minimum height for signs in an area like the Strand be 2.1m from the bottom of the sign to the pavement. Signage currently posted on the Strand is more than twice the recommended level. This should be a reasonable and easy fix for the City, but it won't happen unless the City Council explicitly requires it. • Creation of new, more eye-catching and aesthetic signs along the Strand. We are competing for people's attention with sophisticated advertising messaging; the City needs to put more attention into the visual presentation of its message. I also recommend the creation of additional signs that convey this message, such as "Watch For Children." • More strategic positioning of signage along the Strand. Part of the problem stems from "Bike Only" lanes to the north and south that feed traffic into Hermosa Beach's mixed use Strand. Better and more signage is needed at these key points, as well as the Pier Plaza area. • Maintain a "Walk Zone" in the City's downtown area. • Establish a stronger Police Department presence along the Strand, including periodic interception and ticketing for speeding and reckless behavior. When the San Diego City Council mandated such actions by its police department last summer, along its mixed use Mission Beach Boardwalk, speeds and accidents along the Boardwalk decreased. Enforcement works. It creates public awareness and a sense of consequence for unsafe actions. In the long-term, I also support the Surfrider Foundation's recent request that Hermosa Beach begin exploration of the options, benefits and impacts of extending the dedicated bike path that currently ends at 24th Street and Hermosa Avenue to Herondo Avenue and the City's southern border with Redondo Beach. By re -directing non -motor wheeled traffic that wishes to travel at street speeds from the Strand onto a dedicated corridor on the street, traffic congestion on the Strand will be lessened and overall safety on the Strand will be enhanced. This action is consistent with Policy 21 of the Hermosa Beach General Plan, which calls for the development of bicycle trail ways within the city that will encourage increased rider ship, address noise, speed and traffic calming issues, while beautifying and enhancing the character of the city. It is consistent as well with the recommendations of • • final report of the city's Economic Development Review Committee which states as a goal the improvement of pedestrian safety and circulation by deemphasizing the need of automobiles to circumnavigate the city. As the report states, the city needs to expand bike routes throughout the city as an incentive measure, as well as to "...support and tie the community together." I request that the City Council take the following action: • Commission a scoping study to analyze potential bike routes, expressways, lanes or paths within the City as part of a citywide alternative transportation plan. Such a study, conducted by a reputable consultant such as Palo Alto's Bicycle Solutions (www.bicyclesolutions.com) will qualify the City for restricted state funds reserved for bicycle transportation projects, such as the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA). As identified by Economic Development Review Committee this project would also qualify the City for other funding sources such as Main Street USA, as well as grants for urban beautification available through the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Thank you for your time and consideration. ### • February 3, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council e ,2hD/Dy Regular meeting of February 10, 2004 SB744 (DUNN) — CONSIDERATION OF TAKING A POSITION IN OPPOSITION TO THIS PROPOSED LEGISLATION Recommendation: That the City Council take a position of opposition to SB744 (Dunn) and direct that a letter be sent to the author and the City's state representatives and that staff track the bill. Background: A copy of SB744 is attached for your review. This bill, if enacted, would allow the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) the authority to overturn local land use decisions after hearing appeals from local developers who were either denied or approved with conditions by the City. The proposed legislation would allow the HCD to override the City's decision. The League of California Cities is urging that each City take a position on this bill. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager League of California Cities • • Page 1 of 2 News and Information > Newsroom > News Updates > SB 744 (Dunn) Moves From the Senate to the Assembly SB 744 (Dunn) Moves From the Senate to the Assembly Posted: 01/30/04 The Senate approved SB 744 (Dunn) by a vote of 21-12 on Monday, January 26th. This measure gives the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) the authority to overtum local land use decisions after hearing appeals from housing development applicants who were previously denied approval or granted approval with conditions by a local agency. HCD is empowered to overrule local decisions that it views as "not reasonable or consistent with local housing needs." The League had hoped that SB 744 would remain in the Senate to allow negotiations on Housing Element reform to continue at HCD without political pressure. We understood, however, that Senator Dunn had the ability to move SB 744 to the Assembly no matter what. A prominent member of the Senate, Senator Dunn was also working closely with the powerful California Building Industry Association (CBIA) to lobby the bill on the Senate floor. However, city efforts to educate their legislators about the flaws in this legislation had an effect: we were able to pick up a few key Democratic opponents to the bill (Senators Chesboro, Sher, Speier and Kamette) as well as many Republicans. Roll call votes on SB 744 are included below. NOW THE ASSEMBLY: WE NEED YOUR HELPI Anti -local government rhetoric is frequently a part of the debate on controversial housing legislation such as SB 744. Therefore, it is imperative that local officials continue to remind state legislators of the importance of local democracy, particularly where land use decisions are concerned. As the fight against SB 744 moves to the Assembly, here are things your city can and should do to help: 1. Say Thank You (Where Appropriate). If your Senator voted against SB 744 or abstained from voting, take the time to thank them and make sure their commitment to local governments on this issue remains firm. 2. Send an opposition letter on SB 744 to Your Assembly Member. Visit the advocacy section on the League's website to find your representative. A sample letter is available. • Copy the Chair of the Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee and the Chair of the Assembly Local Government Committee at their Committee offices. Addresses below. Assemblyman Alan Lowenthal Chair, Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee 1020 N St., Room 167A Sacramento, CA Committee Office Phone: 916.319.2085 Committee Office Fax: 916.319.3182 Assemblyman Simon Salinas, Chair, Assembly Local Government Committee 1020 N St., Room 157 Sacramento, CA - Committee Office Phone: 916.319.3958 Committee Office Fax: 916.319.3959 • Copy the League of California Cities, attn: Dan Carrigg. Address below. League of California Cities Attn: Dan Carrigg, Legislative Representative 1400 K St., Suite 400 http://www.cacities.org/doc.asp?printable=yes&ID=8000 2/2/2004 • League of California Cities • Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240 • Page 2 of 2 3. Maintain Contact With Your Legislators. Even if your Senator voted in favor of SB 744, do what you can to reconnect with him or her and explain your serious reservations about the legislation. NOTE: The League is maintaining a list of cities on record in opposition to SB 744. Thus far we have received copies of opposition letters from the following cities: Arcadia, Arcata, Chino Hills, Cotati, Daly City, Davis, El Cajon, Elk Grove, Fairfield, Fremont, Grass Valley, Lafayette, Lakewood, Merced, Napa, Ontario, Redding, Roseville, San Bemardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Clara, St. Helena, and Windsor. If you have taken a position on SB 744 and are not listed here, please fax or email a copy of your letter to Jessica Mullan with the League. Please don't hesitate to contact Dan Carg [916.658.8222, or Jessica Mullan, 916.658.8243, fax 916.658.8240] If you have additional questions on SB 744. Senate Floor Votes - Roll Call On SB 744 (Dunn): Date: 01/26/2004 (Ayes 21. Noes 12.) (Pass) AYES: Alarcon, Alpert, Burton, Cedillo, Ducheny, Dunn, Escutia, Figueroa, Florez, Hollingsworth, Kuehl, Machado, McPherson, Murray, Ortiz, Perata, Romero, Scott, Soto, Torlakson, Vincent NOES: Ackerman, Battin, Chesbro, Denham, Karnette, Knight, McClintock, Morrow, 011er, Poochigian, Sher, Speier ABSENT, ABSTAINING, OR NOT VOTING: Aanestad, Ashbum, Bowen, Brune, Johnson, Margett, Vasconcellos http://www.cacities.org/doc.asp?printable=yes&ID=8000 2/2/2004 • • AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 3, 2003 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 21, 2003 SENATE BILL No. 744 Introduced by Senators Dunn and Ducheny (Principal coauthor: Senator Hollingsworth) (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Steinberg) (Coauthors: Senators Burton and Florez) February 21, 2003 An act to add Section 65585.4 to the Government Code, relating to planning. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 744, as amended, Dunn. Planning: housing. Existing law requires each city, county, or city and county to prepare and adopt a general plan for its jurisdiction that contains certain mandatory elements, including a housing element. One part of the housing element is an assessment of housing needs and inventory of resources and constraints relevant to meeting these needs. The assessment includes the locality's share of regional housing needs which is determined by the appropriate council of governments, subject to revision by the Department of Housing and Community Development. This bill would -establish -within require the department -a -Housing specified, to hear appeals of city, county, or city and county decisions on applications for the construction of housing developments that meet specified affordability requirements. 97 r • SB 744 — 2 — Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State -mandated local program: no. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Section 65585.4 is added to the Government Code, to read: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1l 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 : :: :. . department. 25 (b) Any applicant who proposes to construct a housing 26 development that meets the criteria of subdivision (c) and whose 27 application is either denied or approved with conditions that in his 28 or her judgment render the provision of housing infeasible, may 29 appeal the decision of the city, county, or city and county to the 30 -. department. However, 31 32 33 34 35 respective department or -office to serve on the committee. The 65585.4. (a) The department shall hear appeals pursuant to this section eemmittee. The department shall conduct the hearings in accordance with rules and regulations established by the conditions or mitigation measures impose pursuant to a local coastal permit or an environmental review required by the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code) may not be appealed. 97 P • —3— SB 744 1 (c) An applicant may file an appeal with the 2ommiitcc 2 department if both of the following criteria are met: 3 (1) The proposed housing development will meet any of the 4 following affordability requirements: 5 (A) Five percent of the total housing of the housing 6 development is available at affordable housing cost to extremely 7 low income households whose household income is Tess than or 8 equal to 30 percent of the area median income. 9 (B) Ten percent of the total housing of the development is 10 available at affordable housing cost to very low income 11 households, as defined in Section 50105 of the Health and Safety 12 Code. 13 (C) Twenty percent of the total housing of the development is 14 available at affordable housing cost to lower income households, 15 as defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code. 16 (D) Fifty percent of the total housing of the development is 17 available at affordable housing cost to moderate -income 18 households, consistent with Section 50052.5 of the Health and 19 Safety Code. 20 (2) Either of the following criteria is met as of the date on which 21 the application to the city, county, or city and county is deemed 22 complete: 23 (A) The city, county, or city and county has adopted a housing 24 element that the department has determined pursuant to Section 25 65585 to be in substantial compliance with the requirements of this 26 article, and the proposed housing development, exclusive of any 27 density bonus granted pursuant to Section 65915, is consistent 28 with both the density allowed by the jurisdiction's zoning 29 ordinance and the general plan land use designation as specified 30 in any element of the general plan as of the date the application was 31 deemed complete, provided that consistency shall not be required 32 with the zoning ordinance or land use designation if the 33 jurisdiction has not amended the ordinance or the designation to 34 conform to the adopted housing element. 35 (B) The city, county, or city and county has not adopted a 36 housing element that the department has determined pursuant to 37 Section 65585 to be in substantial compliance with the 38 requirements of this article, and the proposed housing 39 development; is located on a site that is designated for residential 97 P • • SB 744 1 or commercial uses in any element of the general plan as of the date 2 the application was deemed complete. 3 (d) An applicant may file an appeal with the committee 4 department within 20 days after the date of the decision by the 5 local agency to deny the application or approve the application 6 with conditions that render the provision of housing infeasible. 7 The committee department shall notify the local agency of the 8 filing of sueh an appeal within 10 days, and the local agency shall, 9 within 10 days of the receipt of the notice, transmit a copy of its 10 decision and the reasons therefor to the eemmitteedepartment. 11 The appeal shall be heard within 30 days after receipt of the request '12 for an appeal by the applicant. The 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 beard -appeal hearing may be conducted by the department or a hearing officer appointed by the director of the department. A stenographic record of the proceedings shall be kept. At ita next Within 30 days of the appeals hearing, the department shall render a written decision, based upon a majority vote, stating its findings of fact, its conclusions and the reasons therefor. The hearing by the Committee department shall be limited to the issue of whether, in the case of the denial of an application, the decision of the city, county, or city and county was reasonable and consistent with meeting local housing needs as determined pursuant to Section 65584 and, in the case of an approval of an application with conditions and requirements imposed, whether those conditions and requirements render the provision of housing infeasible and whether they are reasonable and consistent with meeting local housing needs as determined pursuant to Section 65584. If the committee department finds, in the case of a denial, that the decision of the local agency is not reasonable or consistent with meeting local housing needs, it shall vacate the decision and shall direct the local agency to issue any necessary approval or permit to the applicant. If the committee department finds, in the case of an approval with conditions and requirements imposed, that the decision of the board renders the provision of housing infeasible and is not reasonable or consistent with meeting local housing needs, it shall order the local agency to modify or remove any such condition or requirement so as to make the project no longer 97 P • • —5— SB 744 1 infeasible and to issue any necessary permit or approval. Decisions 2 or conditions and requirements imposed by a local agency that are 3 consistent with meeting local housing needs shall not be vacated, 4 modified, or removed by the eommittcc department 5 notwithstanding that those decisions or conditions and 6 requirements have the effect of rendering the provision of housing 7 infeasible. 8 (e) In any appeal before the committee department, the 9 applicant shall have the initial burden of proof to show that it has 10 met the requirements of subdivision (c). In a case of approval with 11 conditions or requirements imposed, the applicant shall also have 12 the burden of proof to show that the conditions and requirements 13 render the provision of housing infeasible. If the applicant meets 14 the initial burden of proof, then the city, county, or city and county 15 shall have the burden of proof to show that its action was 16 reasonable in that denial of the project or the failure to implement 17 the conditions and requirements, as proposed, would have a 18 specific, adverse impact, as defined in Section 65589.5, upon the 19 public health or safety, the physical environment, or on any real 20 property that is listed in the California Register of Historical 21 Resources, that there is no feasible method to satisfactorily 22 mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the 23 project infeasible, and that the mitigation or avoidance of such 24 impacts outweigh local housing needs. 25 (f) The • • ' department or the 26 applicant shall have the power to enforce the orders of the 27 eemmittce-department at law or in equity in the superior court. 28 The city, county, or city and county shall carry out the order of the 29 - . . department within 30 days of 30 its entry and, upon failure to do so, the order of the-eetutttittee 31 department shall for all purposes, be deemed to be the action of the 32 local agency, unless the applicant consents to a different decision 33 or order by the local agency. 34 (g) The department may charge a fee to cover actual costs 35 directly related to the activities of theHousing-Ateettotability 36 etc -department in administering this section. The fee shall 37 initially be paid by the applicant. If the committee -department 38 orders approval of the proposed development or modifies or 39 removes any conditions or requirements imposed upon the 97 • SB 744 — 6 — 1 applicant, the city, county, or city and county shall reimburse the 2 applicant for the fee paid pursuant to this subdivision. 3 (h) (1) For the purposes of this section, "housing 4 development" means a development project consisting of one or 5 more residential dwelling units or an emergency shelter facility. 6 (2) For the purposes of this section, an adopted housing 7 element that has been self -certified pursuant to Section 65585.1 8 shall be deemed to have been approved by the department, unless 9 a court finds that the jurisdiction's housing element does not 10 substantially comply with this article. 11 (i) The remedies provided in this section are in addition to any 12 other remedy provided by law. 0 97 P • January 5, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 13, 2004 CITY'S BANNER PROGRAM Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the following report regarding the City's Banner Program. Summary: The City presently has banner poles at five locations: Hermosa Avenue at Lyndon Avenue, Pier Avenue at Valley Drive, 10th Street at PCH, Aviation Boulevard at Prospect Avenue, and PCH at 1st Street. These poles were installed in the early '80's and were primarily used for civic related non-profit events. Approximately five years ago the City adopted a commercial banner program, which allowed commercial advertising at a rental rate of $2,500 per month. Commercial banners were restricted to two sites: PCH at 1st Street and Aviation Boulevard at Prospect Avenue. The City used this program to raise funds for special projects such as the Vetter Windmill and others. Over the past two years they have primarily been used for generating funding for the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation. A number of issues have developed which this report will address. The first issue is the structural capability of the poles to handle the increased size of the banners. The second issue came last summer when Caltrans informed the City that it could not display commercial - advertising on PCH. Issue No. 1 – Structural analysis of Banner Poles: There have been two incidents over the last year and a half that have caused staff concern that the banners are exceeding the capability of the existing poles. The first incident occurred in late 2002 when extreme wind loading caused a cable to break at Aviation and Prospect and damaged some car windshields. The second incident occurred in March, 2003 when extreme winds caused the poles at 1st and PCH to sway back and forth, loosening the anchor bolts and damaging the concrete foundation cap. Because of the safety concerns these two incidents raised, staff determined that a review of the size requirements for banners and methods of attachment was necessary. The banner poles are 20-25 years old and have attachment points for banner cables welded by J the manufacturer at the top of the poles spaced at 3 -feet apart. The pole manufacturer's - 4 recommendations were most likely for a 3 -foot tall banner to be supported with attachments to a F c cable at the top (with a 5 -degree sag – not taut!) and the bottom corners attached to the bottom 4` P connection point on the pole with a tether. This method of hanging the banner was to minimize w wind loading transferred to the poles. o Q Li - Over the years these poles were modified with attachment points spaced 4 -feet apart to = accommodate the 4' x 40' banner. In addition to this change a second cable was added at the CI) — bottom and both cables were tightened very taut. These changes were made to make the 6c banner more rigid minimizing the bouncing and flapping which made them difficult to read. -1 b • • • Unfortunately this rigidity also means that they induced much higher stresses in the poles. The next change that was implemented was to install two banners, one above the other. This was done at the Pier/ Valley location and the Aviation/Prospect location, where demand was the highest. This of course greatly exceeded the anticipated wind Toads on the banner poles. Staff contacted Ameron International Pole Company, the major manufacturer of these types of steel poles, to determine the original design requirements. It was requested that they run the calculations based upon design standards in place in the 1980's. The major difference was that the maximum wind velocity was set at 60 mph with a 1.3 gust factor. The present design standard requires an 80 mph wind velocity with same gust factor. The 4' x 40' banner still far exceeded allowable stresses (see attached structural calculations). These calculations assume worst case, solid and rigid banner installation Due to safety concerns, staff has implemented the following changes to the banner program: o No double banners are allowed on banner poles o Bottom of banners is attached to pole with rope tethers only o 4' x 40' banners are required to be open mesh fabric o Maximum size of a solid banner material is 3' x 30' Issue No. 2 — Commercial Banner Program: Caltrans has issued the City a new encroachment permit for installation of banners at the PCH and 1st Street location. The banners are restricted from displaying any private advertisements (see attached copy of permit). The City has been working with State Assemblymember George Nakano's office to set up a meeting to review this requirement, but has not as yet confirmed a date. Staff recommends that the City continue the commercial program utilizing the Aviation at Prospect site, as already authorized by City Council. The original need for two locations never seemed to materialize. Granted, PCH was the preferred location with 60,000 average daily traffic (ADT). Aviation has a 30,000 ADT, Pier Avenue has a 19,500 ADT and Hermosa at Lyndon has a 14,800 ADT. Staff recommends that the Education Foundation's request (letter dated December 10, 2003 attached) to use the Pier at Valley location be denied. The large majority of civic oriented banner requests (see attached memo dated January 5, 2004) received in 2003 want the Pier Avenue location. The Council has guaranteed the Education Foundation at least 6 months per year for their banner, which would eliminate the majority of these other requests. Staff also considered the Education Foundation's request to move the Aviation and 10th Street banner poles to span the northbound PCH right turn lane to eastbound Aviation. The thinking here is that this location would also be very visible to traffic on PCH. Staff recommends against this request and submits the following comments: o The median island appears to all be in Caltrans' right-of-way and therefore could not be permitted. o There are serious concerns regarding adding any further distractions to the drivers in this high-speed right turn lane due to potential conflicts with the pedestrian crosswalk and the parked vehicles and driveways immediately east of this location. This is a very high accident location. o There is not adequate clearance from overhead power lines. o Maintenance crews would have to close the ramp to all traffic to raise and lower banners. 2 • • o Potential view impacts to nearby Hotel and businesses would require a public hearing. o Cost of $50-75,000 to meet present building codes. Fiscal Impact: None at this time. Attachments: 1. Structural calculations 2. Caltrans Permit 3. Memo dated 1/5/04 Respectfully submitted, Concur: Imo% Richard D ' organ, P.E. StephAe11111 Director of Public Works/City Engineer City Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Cope and Finance Director 3 H:\895\PW FILESCCITEMSbanner Info update 1.13-04.doc December 10, 2003 EDUCATION Mr. Steve Burrell FOUNDATION City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 DearSteve, heeding in au i1t...uwe�linq I au jutnx '0. Box 864 lermosa Beach :alifornio )0254 310.372.1785 vww.HBEF.com DX i.d. #33-0522270 RECEIVED DEC 1 1 2003 Per.... ....:. We look forward to attending the meeting you have planned with Cal Trans • next week to discuss the re-establishment of a banner at PCH and First. Street. Our Banner Program has generated over $80,000 and because the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation is run entirely by volunteers, 100% of the money we raise goes to our schools. The banner location of PCH and First St. is prime and many of our contributors request that location for their advertising. We cannot lose this valuable source of income to our schools! .. We request to be on the agenda for the Hermosa Beach City Council meeting to be held January93, 2004. We would like to ask the Council: 1 -To vote on putting a banner at Valley Drive and Pier Avenue. 2 -To vote on moving the banner poles from Aviation and 10th St. to 'Aviation at PCH. We request the Public Works Department to perform an in-depth study of the poles at the above named sites. 1 -Give us a detail of the age of the poles. 2 -Study the connectors of the banner to the tendons of the pole's. 3 -Consider the installation of a partial collapse system in the event of high winds. 4 -Increase the size of the banner to 4' x 40'. Thank you for your support Steve. Our Banner Program is a very important source of revenue for us. We look forward to hearing from you soon about the meeting with Cal Trans. Sincerely, p tf deL& Ceivt--- Heddi Sanders Marra Fof n an Co -president - Co -president HERMOSA BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION DEC -22-2003 10:00 AMERON INTERNATIONAL PROJECT; CITY OF Pfic Lighting Sales BANNER POLES (DESIGN IS BASED ON 1994 MSHTO - FANNER POLE ANALYSIS INPUT DATA; WIND V:=60.0 (MPH) P:=(V.13)2..00256 P= 15.6(PsF) CABLE: SP '=100.Q (FT) We :=1.5 (LBS/VT) Cp:= 2.0 (LBS/FT) SG.=0.05•SP SG = 5 (FT) MPH WINO) BANNER: L :=40.0 (FT) BH:=4.0 (FT) BA :=1....13H.1.0 BA is 160 (SO. FT.) Wb :=480.0 (LBS) CD:=1.] xi := SP - L 2 2 X1 . 30 (PT) X2:=SP+L 2 2 X2 a 70 (FT) TENSION DUE TO DEAD LOAD. [Wb 2P� Ry J SP Ty Ry 2P-1(Wc 2P) 4P+i 2b2 4/J SG TENSION DUE TO LIVE LOAD' {BA•P.CD•(X1 +X2)1 t (CP ZP) LL SP J Rx Tx SP (((( 2 Rx 2 -L1� 2Pl11 4P+IBA•2•CD.1l 1 POLE: H:=30.0 (FT) H1:=29.6 (FT) H2.=25.6 (FT) Db :=10.75 (IN) Dt :=Db - H-0 Dt = 10.75 (IN) T:=.5 (IN) Vd-V•Db+Dt 2.12 Vd = 53.75 Cd :=0.45 Ry = 240.25(Les) Ty = 1552.5 (LBS) Rx • 210.402 (LBS) SG 'RESULTANT TENSION' ( (7k)217 Tr = 4632.316 PETERMINEMOMENT ® EASE OF POLE: Tx = 4364.412 (LBS) (LOAD TR C Hi AND TX @ H2 TO DETERMINE EASE MOMENT) Mb :=Tr•H1 t Tx•H2 t t Db t Dt P Cd 2.12 2} Mb as 245939.697 (FT -185) 49953949 597 1753 P.01 PAGE 1 OF 2 BY: G. MACKEY DATE; 124-03 pEFINITION2 BA = banner area BH = banner height CD = drag coefficient for banner Cd = drag ceefcient for pole Cp a wind pressure on cable per ft CSR = combined etress ratio Db • pole DMB die • Dt = pole top dia lb = bending stress Fb = allowable bending stress Fy = yield stress H = po!e height Ht = attachment ® top of banner 112 • attachment 'SIP bottom of banner L • length of banner Mb = pole base moment P = wind pressure Rx • live load reaction Ry• load load reaction S = whom modulus SG = 5% sag SP = span between poles T = pole wall thickness Tr = resultant tension Tx = live load tension Ty = dead bad tension V = wind velocity Wb v banner weight We = weight of cable per ft. of span ATTACHMENT 1 DEC=22-2003 10:01 P is Lighting Sales PAGE 2 OF2 STRESS ANALYSIS: 5'Dbk2 T12•T S = 41.237 (IN'3) fb = Mb 12 fb = 72441.596 S COMBINED STRESS RATIO. Fy:=36000.0 Fb :=Fy 0.66 Pb = 23760 fb CSR:= CSR= 2.178 < 1.0 4 Fb•1.4 BASE PLATE AND ANCHOR BOLT ANALYSIS INPUT. (TRY 1.75- DIAMETER ANCHOR BOLT ASTM A307) SQ :=16.0 (IN) A =1.9 (SQ. IN.) BC:=14.25 (IN) N:=4 (NUMBER OF BOLTS) BL:=M6.12.4 (BL =LOAD PER BOLT) BC•N BL = 209633.429 (LBS) BS := BL (BS = BOLT STRESS) A BS = 110333.384 (PSI) 13y :=36000 (P51) (YIELD STRESS) BA.=By.0.5.1.4 BA = 25200 (PSD BARBS THEREFORE 2.0" DIA. BOLT IS NOT OK e FIND THICKNESS REQUIRED FOR BASE PLATE; (BASE PLATE YIELD STRESS IS 30000PSI) W (2 .SQ2/`3 - Db W = 11.877 (IN) BC- Db C, - C=1.75 ON) 2 T B1 -45•C2 ;36000•.66-1.4.W T = 2.36 (IN) (,MINIMUM BASE PLATE REQUIRED) THEREFORE USE 22' 50 t 2.25" THK BASE PLATE IN/ 27' BOLT CIRCLE 9953949 597 1753 P.02 TOTAL P.03 PEC -24-2003 10:53 • STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT Or 1RANSPORTAI1ON ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 7X-0120 (NEW SN2) Deni: N• P.01/06 703-NBR-2600 In compliance with (check one) : X Your application of December 14 2003 TO: DisvtoifuVVPM 07 -LA -1-20.621/21.341 nix December 24, 2003 Utility Notice No of Agreement NO of R/W Contract No. . of CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH , CA 90254 ATTN: MICHAEL FLAHERTY PHONE: (310) 318-0259 Fee Paid EXEMPT Deposit EXLaMPT Performance Rood Amount (I) S Payment Bond Amount (7) f bond Company Dotal Number (1) blond Number(2) PERMITTEE RiECEENISED [� 212(103" AND SUBJECT TO THE GENERAL PROVISIONS AND THE FOLLOWING, PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: ENCROACH WITHLN STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF RENEWAL OF ANNUAL PERMIT NUMBER 702•NBR-0559 TO INSTALL BANNERS ACROSS PACIFIC COAST HIGIIWAY (STATE ROUTE 1) NEAR l" STREET FOR VARIOUS CITY SPONSORED EVENTS AND TO DISPLAY CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ALONG PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (STATE ROUTE 1) BETWEEN PIER AVENUE AND HERONDO STREET (07 -LA -I-20.62 I/21341), WITH ALL INSTALLATIONS BEING PERFORMED UNDER THIS ANNUAL PERMIT, IN TILE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACII; ALL 174 ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT STATE SPECIFICATIONS AND T1i2 ATTACHED SPECIAL PROVISIONS. . PERMITTEE SHALL NOTIFY PERMIT INSPECTOR BY CALLING LARRY TOICUYAMA AT (310) 609-0354 BETWEEN 0700 AND 0900, A MINIMUM OF TEN WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE INITIAL START OF WORK AND THREE WORKING DAY PRIOR TO CLOSING TRAFFIC LANES. PERMITTEE SHALL ARRANGE A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THEIR CONTRACTORS AND THE PERMIT INSPECTOR TO INSURE A COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORK AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BY ACCuuANCS M' TMD. Famma. II IR MkrahUNOCASTAND.S AND Mi*rb$ TO *LIAIOW' 1k) 1IAT5 FOA ANY AND Au. (USX INCUYALO wok NAVINU WGRLCTh6 SOAR • PUUORMACO ST THC STAte FORCES UR UNDER CONTRACT IN TMS &VENT THAT TIIF. Ii kMnTER. HIS CONTMCT*O4 OA SUBCONTRACTOR IAM. TO INSTALL. RrJLACI. IEPAlk RI STURE. OR RSMOYB PACIIITISS IO STATS SIKmCATIONS W R TMG IMMEDIATE. SAFE OrCRATION OF THE MONW AT ASD SATCPACTORY COMPLETION OF ALL PERMIT WDk K. Sr IS UNDMST000 THAT The ABOv5 CHARCIS ARE N ADDITIONTO ANY PEAMrT Pus AND THAT TIM FFRwn', ES WIU. OC BILLED NIR Snit/CHARM AFTER SATISFACTORY COMFtLTON DPAU, WOIIR 'Ihc following onaehmcnts arc 3110 included u pan of shit permit. - In addition to fee the permittee will he • (Check spptkabk): billed acetal costs for: X .Yes General Provisions Yes X No Utility Maintenance Provisions X Yes No Special Provisions A, Q 8 S Yet X No A Cel -OSHA permit rtquireJ prior In beginning work; Yes X No Review Yu X No Ilupection X Yes No Field Work (if any Caltrans effort Expended) Yes X No The imbmuuon in the envimnmental documentation bat bear Itvicwed and considered prior lo apprord of this permit. This permit is void unless the work is completed before December 31. 2004. Tho permit is to be strictly construed and another work Hun specifically mentioned it hemby authorised. No projrcl mirk shall be tom minced until all other heaters permits and environnumsl Or:winces here been obtained. WEST REGION TORRANCE TOKUYAMA (INSPECTOR) MARIN (INFO.) APPROVED: Hector b• a. DistrictPer ftEJineer- D y: Mi ATTACHMENT2 ieh. ssis Di DEC -24-2003 1053 , 703-NBR-2600 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page 2 of 3 SPECIAL PROVISIONS • P.02'06 1. THE BANNERS AND AMERICAN FLAGS SHALL NOT CONTAIN PRIVATE ADVERTISEMENT NOR BE OFA POLITICAL NATURE. 2. THE DISPLAY MAY NOT BE IN PLACE MORE THAN TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO THE EVENT AND SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED AFTER THE EVENT. HOWEVER, THE TOTAL PERIOD OF DISPLAY SHOULD NOT EXCEED SIX WEEKS. THE ANNUAL PERMIT FOR BANNERS WILL BE LIMITED TO THE INSTALLATION OF BANNERS FOR EVENTS SPONSORED BY THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ONLY, INSTALLATION BY ALL OTHER NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS CAN ONLY BE PERFORMED BY OBTAINING A SEPARATE PERMIT FROM CALTRANS. • 3 THE STATE PERMIT INSPECTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF BANNERS ALLOWED. 4. IF THE WORK AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT IS TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTORS FORCES, THE PERMITTEES CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH THE STATE WITH A SIGNED APPLICATION REQUESTING A SEPARATE CALTRANS PERMIT (DOUBLE PERMIT) AUTHORIZING THE CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM THE WORK WITHIN THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE PERMITTEE. THE PERMIITEE'S CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO REIMBURSE THE STATE FOR THE COST INCURRED FOR ENGINEERING INSPECTION OF THE WORK WITHIN THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ALL OTHER PERMIT RELATED WORK PERFORMED BY CALTRANS' MAINTENANCE FORCES WHEN, AS DETERMINED BY CALTRANS, IT BECOMES NECESSARY. THE PERMITTEES CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE THE SIGNED ORIGINAL PERMIT AND DOUBLE PERMIT OR COPIES WITH ALL SPECIAL PROVISIONS AT THE JOB -SITE AT ALL TIMES WHILE WORK IS BEING CONDUCTED. 5. PERMITTEE SHAIL.MAKE ARRANGEMENTS WITH LOCAL POLICE TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL WHILE BANNERS ARE BEING INSTALLED OR REMOVED. B. NO WORK THAT INTERFERES WITH PUBLIC TRAFFIC SHALL BE PERFORMED BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 06:00 AM. AND 09:00 A.M. AND AFTER 03:00 P.M. UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE STATE PERMIT INSPECTOR. 7. SUSPENSION OR INSTALLATION ON STATE OWNED TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES OR OTHER STATE OWNED FACILITIES IS PROHIBITED. 8 THE LOWER EDGE OF THE BANNERS OR FLAGS SHALL BE AT LEAST 5.49M (16) ABOVE THE HIGHWAY PAVEMENT AT ITS CLOSEST POINT. 9. PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR AND PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES. 10. ORANGE VEST AND HARD HAT SHALL BE WORN AT ALL TIMES WHILE WORKING WITHIN THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. 11. PERMITTEE SHALL SE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEANUP OF ALL DEBRIS ASSOCIATED WITH THE WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS PERMIT IN THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT -0F -WAY, AS DIRECTED BY THE STATE PERMIT INSPECTOR 12. THE PERMITTEE SHALL FURNISH THE NECESSARY INSPECTION TO PROVIDE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AND TO INSURE THAT ALL WORK WITHIN OR AFFECTING THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. THE WORK AUTHORIZED UNDER THIS PERMIT WILL BE MONITORED BY AND WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE STATE PERMIT INSPECTOR. DEC -24-2003 1 :53 703-NBR-2600 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page 3of3 • P.03/Eh 13. ALL WORK PERFORMED PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE AUTHORITY AND APPROVAL OF THE STATE PERMIT INSPECTOR. 19. PERMITTEE MAY RE -APPLY FOR RENEWAL ANNUALLY, ONE MONTH IN ADVANCE OF THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS PERMIT, IF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY IS TO CONTINUE INTO THE NEXT YEAR. THE ATTACHED DISTRICT STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS ARE GENERALIZATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND ARE INCLUDED ONLY AS A PERMITTEE CONVENIENCE. PERMITTEES ATTENTION I5 DIRECTED TO THE CURRENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMPLETE, UNABRIDGED SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. City of 21ermosa Teach Inter Office Memorandum DATE: January 5, 2004 TO: Rick Morgan, Director of Public Works FROM: Michael Flaherty, PW Superintendent SUBJECT: 2003 Banner Users at Pier Avenue/Ardmore AvenueNalley Drive There were many users of the Pier Avenue and Valley Drive banner location during calendar year 2003. They included: SPONSOR EVENT(S) HB Chamber of Commerce 2 Fiestas, Farmers Market HB Public Works Christmas decorations, Hazardous Waste Pick -Up HB Arts Foundation Puppet Shows HB Women's Club . Pancake Breakfast HB Education Foundation Dinner Dance HB Fire Department Fireworks/Pancake Breakfast HB Community Center Sand & Strand Run, Surfers Walk of Fame, Summer Concerts, St. Patrick's Day Parade, Picnic in the Outfield; Movies on the Beach, Christmas Tree Lighting, New Year's Eve Celebration; Aloha Days, Toys for Tots Hennessey's Paddleboard Contest Jewish Community Center After School Program Sandpipers Home Tour, Food & Wine Tasting Our Lady of Guadalupe Spring Fiesta IMG Beach Bash EVP Pro Volley Ball AAU Amateur Volley Ball Beach Cities Health District International Surf Festival Mira Costa High School Booster Club Please note that each banner was up for a period of two weeks. On occasion, two banners were up at one time. In 2003, there were 33 separate banners and/or decorations rotating throuugh both stations at this location. v/3 ei #tt bor%Ikr‘ c ree' tS It is anticipated that the majority of last year's users will also want to use this location in 2004. Please note it is recommended that only one banner be up at any given time rather than two. This will impact greatly the availability of this location. CAWINWORD\MFWck pier ardmore valley banner Info 1-5-04.doc ATTACHMENT 3 City of Jlernwsa Teach Inter Office Memorandum DATE: January 5, 2004 TO: Rick Morgan, Director of Public Works FROM: Michael Flaherty, PW Superintendent SUBJECT: Traffic Counts at Banner Locations As you know, the most current traffic counts available are from 1998. Counts for the banner locations were: PCH at 1st St. 60,000/day Aviation at Prospect 30,000 PierNalley/Ardmore 19,500 Linden at Hermosa 14,800 PCH at 10th St. 54,500 • Mr. Roger Bacon Ralph's Shopping Center P 0. Box 282 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 JUDGE NETTING, INC. 23425 No. 39th Drive, Suite 104-148 Glendale, Arizona 85310 Phone: 800-955.8788 PROPOSAL & CONTRACT February 10, 2074 rite -77i> 7 Dear Roger We propose to supply the material, labor, and equipment necessary to replace four steel banner poles. The new poles will be 16" diameter galvanized steel poles installed 25' above ground, designed to withstand 80 mph wind load. We will also install 3/8" stainless cable ready to receive your 4' banners. Proposal Price: $26,950.00 Add $1,200.00 if stamped engineering Is required. Exceptions: This proposal does not include permits or associated costs. Customer responsible for traffic control. Price frm for acceptance for a period of 60 days. Judge Netting is not responsible for locating any private underground utilities or damage to utilities caused from construction. Excavations MI be based on adequate soil conditions and reasonable access and all excavated material will be spread next to the hole (or excavation) Should rocky, sandy, or wet conditions be encountered, the additional charge will be cost plus 10%. Should this project be stopped for lack o" permits or any other reason by client, all work and materials will be invoiced to date and a $2,500.00 remobilization fee will be charged. Damage to driveways, park ng lots, tennis courts, irrigation system, or sod, that may be caused by our equipment as it enters or leaves the work area. Judge Netting makes no warranty, either expressly or impled, as to the protective capaoilities of netting or structures, including height requirements. Terms of Payment: 30% deposit due upon acceptance of contract, and rema ning ba'ance due upon completion. Invoices not paid when cue are subject to a service charge of 1-1/2% per month. This is an annual percentage rate of 18%. Should suit be instituted to enforce the provisions of this Proposal and Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attomey's fees and court costs as determined by the court or other tribunal hearing the matter. We look forward to working with you and express our appreciation for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Please feel free to call us with any questions. ACCEPTED BY PURCHASER JUDGE NE :NIG, By: BY 400. Date: Date: February 10 2004 California Headquarters Phone: 909-7934088 Fax: 909.793.9097 • < />< PVD/or February 4, 2004 City Council Meeting February 10, 2004 Mayor and Members of the City Council VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - APPOINTMENT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO FILL UNEXPIRED TERM DUE TO UNSCHEDULED VACANCY Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council appoint from among the Planning Commission applicants interviewed this evening to fill an unexpired term ending June 30, 2004. Background: At its meeting of January 27, 2004, the City Council scheduled a meeting prior to the regular meeting of February 10 for the purpose of interviewing Commission applicants for the unscheduled vacancy, with appointment to be made during the regular meeting. All applicants were immediately notified by phone and by mail of the scheduled 6 p.m. interview meeting. Attached are copies of the four applications on file. Kent Allan Michael Cassidy Richard Koenig. Lynne Pope Elaine Doerfling, City CI-rk Noted: Stephen R. B ' = 1' 'i y anager 7 8a PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION: PLANNING COMMISSION Name Kent Allen Address: 1523 Golden Ave Home Phone: 310-937-1011 Occupation/Profession: Civil Engineer/Real Estate Manager Name of Employer: British Petroleum (ton) Bus. Phone: Address of Employer: REFERENCES Name Local: Linda Beck Greg Breen Mike Koverman Jennifer Alvarado Jennifer Rosenfeld John Dzus Professional: Dick Spake Gary Simning Ken Lanz US Convenience Retail BP West Coast Products LLC 4 Centerpointe Drive La Palma, CA 90623 Position Board of Trustees of the FIB City School District - President Board of Trustees of the HB City School District HB Baseball Commissioner HB Ed Foundation VP HB Ed Foundation AYSO Commissioner J^-rrrnF 1, �.. �. 310-379-6602 310-864-9124 cell Former Asset Manager (& Boss) ARCO Former Real Estate Manager (& Boss) for ARCO & British Petroleum Former Construction Manager (& Boss) for ARCO Phone 310-379-8637 310-374-5698 310-372-7224 310-372-4346 310-318-2917 310-318-5204 661-268-1543 949-448-0997 360-222-3093 • • COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): • I volunteered every other Friday in my son's classroom from ls` to 3rd grade and plan on dong the same for my daughter • I am a member and contributor of the Hermosa Beach Ed Foundation • Assistant coach for my son's Soccer team for two years Why do you wish to be a Commission member? • I want to give back to the community. • I want to be directly involved in both shaping and preserving our community. • I believe that I have the aptitude, educational background, work experience and temperament to add real value as a planning commissioner. • I believe that all residents should seek out places where they can use their experience and skills to benefit their community. I believe that my skills and interests are well suited to being a planning commissioner. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? • To carefully review all issues brought before the commission and to understand the staff recommendations. • To apply sound logic in making decisions brought before the commission, while understanding the long-term implications of making such decisions. • To be involved in the shaping of our city's future. Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with being a board/commission member? No Please give us your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. I hold a BS degree in Civil Engineering and for the past 23 years been involved in a wide variety of construction and real estate projects. Attached you will find my resume which details all my past positions and accomplishments. I hold licenses as both a real estate broker and general contractor. I am also a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) and regularly attend their meetings. • • In addition to all the items listed in my resume, I believe my background is well suited for an appointment to the commission because: • I have worked with and spoken before numerous city counsels and planning commissions throughout Southern California over the past 14 years while working with the development and construction of ARCO AM/PM's. • I have personally managed a wide variety of construction development projects including residential, condominiums, apartment buildings and retail outlets. • I have a good understanding of the building process, plan development, reading plans and construction specifications. I also have experience at negotiating and writing contracts. • I am outgoing and work well with all types of people. • I take great pride in saying that I live in Hermosa Beach and that I plan on being a part of its future. This board/Commission meets on the 3rd Tuesdav at 7:00 pm. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? No. How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? I have lived in Hermosa Beach for a total of 9 years. Comments: I moved to my current residence at 1523 Golden Ave in June of 1996. I am a lifelong resident of the South Bay, having grown up in Manhattan Beach. I first moved to Hermosa Beach in 1977 when my parents built a home on 151 Street. I later rented my first apartment on Valley Drive in Hermosa after completing my BS Degree. I later moved to El Segundo when I got marred to my wife of 17 years. In July of 1987 I moved to Redondo Beach where I purchased my first home. I lived in Redondo for 10 years before moving back to He osa in 1996. Signed: Date: /2/z2/D3 • • KENT JOHN ALLEN 1523 Golden Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 cell: 310-864-9124 home: 310-937-1011 email: allenk3@bp.com QUALIFICATIONS • Over 22 years of progressively responsible experience in the construction, real estate, petro -chemical and engineering industries. • Expertise in estimating, bidding, and budget preparation. • Hands-on manager with proven ability to supervise and motivate all levels of personnel including union workers, contractors, sub -contractors, A & E Firms and direct reports. • Proven experience in working with vendors, contractors, as well as local and state agencies. • Thorough knowledge of construction practices, codes, principles and safety requirements. WORK EXPERIENCE BRITISH PETROLEUM (BP acquired ARCO in 412000) 6/90 -present Site Acquisition Manager 10/00 - present Develop new retail business by opening new ARCO gas stations and AM/PM convenience stores in Orange, San Diego and Imperial Counties. My responsibilities include site selection, economic analysis, negotiating the land purchase, gaining management approval, plan development, obtaining site entitlements and building permits and seeing the projects through to completion. ARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY Western Regional Construction Manager 1/96 — 9/00 Managed all construction activities for Retail Sales. This included the construction of all new AM/PM mini markets in the 6 -state region and Canada. Managed all major upgrades, tank replacement projects, ADA upgrades, and major maintenance repairs at all of ARCO's facilities. Managed 8 direct reports, 3 contract engineers and worked closely with administrative staff to monitor budgets and control field activities. Results achieved: • Recognized by senior management in '96 for outstanding performance by successfully completing the largest marketing program in AM/PM history on time and under budget. • Successfully deployed over $200 million of capital over a 5 year period in new site construction and major building renovations. • Received the 'Top Performer" award for outstanding performance in '00. • Promoted to New Site Acquisition Manager Environmental Engineer • 5/95 -12/95 Managed all liability associated with hydrocarbon releases at operating retail facilities at my assigned territory (approximately 300 sites). This effort involved negotiating with local and state agencies and working with outside consultants to determine cost effective solutions for environmental remediation. I bid out and managed the construction activities of contractors for the installation of remediation systems • Promoted to Construction Manager • • Field Engineer 6/90 - 5/95 Managed all construction activities in my assigned territory (San Diego, Arizona, and the Inland Empire). This included the construction of 37 new facilities, approximately 40 tank replacement projects as well as the management of all major maintenance projects in this area. Managed all issues surrounding these projects, including interacting with local municipality's managed budgets, negotiated change orders and coordinated with the sales department. THE BROOKS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1189 - 6190 Project Manager Managed new construction projects including 5 new custom luxury beach homes, one medical facility and tenant improvement projects. Managed all work activities, schedules, preparation of budgets and negotiated all contracts with sub -contractors. Maintained existing accounts with past clients for facilities maintenance and modifications. Helped evaluate real estate purchases for in-house projects. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION 5/82-1/89 Sr. Proiect Engineer Part of the management team responsible for a $300MM expansion project. Responsible for the smooth turnover of all equipment to the end user, including purchasing of all spare parts (approx. $3MM). Established and impleme3nted procedures and budget for maintenance of the new facilities. Determined training needs for maintenance personnel. Reliability Engineer Created and maintained programs designed to reduce maintenance expenses including preventative maintenance programs. Trouble -shoot equipment problems. Proiect Engineer Wrote specifications for varied projects. Reviewed requests from other departments. Developed schedules and cost estimates for capital projects. Monitored budgets. Coordinated drafting and construction for such projects. EDUCATION BS - Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 1980 Continued education in master's level courses in civil engineering, Cal State Long Beach LICENSES AND CREDENTIALS Califomia licensed Real Estate Broker California General Building Contractor Certified Engineer in Training (EIT), June 1980 pc irlf/Pch JAN 0 g 2004 F - i CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION L CRY G.t,;fly; r_; �? NAME OF COMMISSION Planning Commission Name Michael W. Cassidy' • _ _. Home Phone: (310) 374-4689 Address: 43 20th Street, Hermosa Beach, CA Occupation/Profession: Commercial Real Estate Broker Name of Employer Colliers Seeley International Bus. Phone: (310) 381-2434 Addressof Employer 2050 W. 190th Street, Suite 101, Torrance, CA 90504 REFERENCES: Local: Sam Edgerton, Art Yoon Professional: Kathy Hole, Controller — CCH Incorporated Other: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): (1) Chairman - Hermosa Beach LAX Impact Advisory Committee (current) (2) Vice Chairman — LAX Community Noise Round Table (current) (3) Chairman — Flight Tract SubCommittee LAX Round Table (current) Why do you wish to become a Commission member? To further serve my community. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? To deli entl review, research and pursue the enhancement of the community. Page 1 of 2 • • Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? _Yes x No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. Chairman - Hermosa Beach LAX Impact Advisory Committee Vice Chairman - LAX Community Noise Round Table Chairman - Flight Tract Subcommittee LAX Round Table USC Graduate - B.S. Finance Senior Vice President - Colliers Seeley International, Inc. /16 years Donor Hermosa Beach Education Foundation Member American Industrial and Office Realtors Association the third Tuesday This Board/Commism sion eets on of each month at 7:00 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? _Yes x No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Since 1993 Comments: Signed: Date: Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) • BOARD/COMMISSION APIIICATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH NAME OF COMMISSION: PLANNING Name: Richard L. Koenig Home Phone: 310-318-1403 Address: 1825 Manhattan Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Occupation/Profession: Building Contractor/ Designer Name of Employer: CIA Design & Construction (Owner) Bus. Phone: 310-990-0673 Address of Employer: P.O. Box 144, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 REFERENCES: Local: Richard & Cathy McCurdy 310-374-4072 Professional: Robert Mc Eachen 310-376-9042 Other: Thelma Greenwald 310-376-3429 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): 2003-2004 Hermosa Beach Man of the Year President: Kiwanis Club of Hermosa Beach Vice -President: Hermosa Arts Foundation Vice -President: Hermosa Beach Historical Society Member: Hermosa Beach Sister City Association Member. Hermosa Beach Coordinating Council Member. Economic Development Review Committee Chairperson: Numerous fundraisers and regularly scheduled events in Hermosa Beach. Ongoing monetary and in-kind donations to local charities and programs within our City. Past Director. Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Past Director; Souh BAnti DruQCoaiitlon. 1vmy ao you wishto become a ommission member? feel strongly that if appointed to The Hermosa Beach Planning Commission, I will be able to make a positive impact with respect to the future direction and managed growth of Hermosa Beach. My family has seen 5 generations in our fair City and I have no intention of living anyplace else. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? The Planning commission is governed in all respects and performs duties as prescribed by applicable state and local laws. The primary purpose of the Commission is to maintainlad enhance the environment of the community, which entails advance or long-range planning (updating of the General Plan and specific elements), current planning (short-range projects), and land use controls (administering to the code and review of all subdivisions and zoning petitions). The Commission serves as an advisory board to the City Council on all matters pertaining to zoning, conditional use permit process, etc. riefilh DEC 2 3 2003 ccrcF Heraca a; Page 1 of 2 Do you have any current obligations or responsibiliti 1, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes_ No X(If yes, please explain) Due to the fact that I am a contractor who works in Hermosa Beach, I am sure that at some point there could be an issue before the Planning Commission that may require me to recuse myself. However, I am not a residential or commercial developer and have no interest in building new homes. The majority of my work entails residential and commercial aesthetic improvements. Please givea.resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. have spent the last 30+ years as a working contractor. My expertise includes all facets of the construction industry including but not limited to, design, finding alternative methods of implementing proposed client needs to insure client / neighbor harmony, blueprint preparation, working with and defining property lines and height limitations, the Uniform Building Code, dealing with a multitude of City, State, and Federal authorities with respect to permits, variances, conditional use permits, environmental issues etc... I have extensive hands on knowledge in ALL of the building trades, (framing, concrete & masonry, electrical, plumbing, roofing, drywall, cabinetry & finish work, etc...). Due to the fact that I know personally and professionally, a great many of the local contractors, developers, and residents of Hermosa Beach, I have a "behind the scenes' knowledge of the sometimes subversive methods of presentation that have been used in an attempt to convince the Commission of their own personal agendas. This Board/Commission meets on Tuesday at 7 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Most of my 51 years Comments: I appreciate your consideration in this matter for the appointment to the positior of Hermosa Beach Planning Commissioner. When appointed, I will serve with the best interes of Hermosa Beach as my primary criteria. Thank You In • dv- ce. Signed( Date: 1 - - - mber 20, 2003 (12/20/03) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION /� NAME OF COMMISSION }tE1M054 $6401/ PCtn�/✓lA o bp/gigs/4g Name /^^J AJAJE- PO S' ,, I Home Phone:WO 379 %S7 7 / Address: 20 i Haw 4tq, /tint 494.44nt 17 494.44 CA- 9025 7 �/ APR 1 7 2003 CITY CLERK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Occupation/Profession:Name of Employer _ W L LLI 4r t 5 i ete-g..,.:„;n > : a 1?-an:esti O lD 3.757 2 500 Stol / /7PyR- 4- 3,G ,2q TJGa-C�l Address of Employer ASO S at/l44 e/ r t r REFERENCES: Local: //S 4iee% t41- 4. -1144M(-OS& '32 6 - a y ?•3-. Professional: a - Professional: AL 3/3 • i0 3 8r8• t/7. o o a--. cit,k- 1 //amok Other: NLI•L COMMyyUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE(past and present): - Matt' gc*f'e % /%y aAzar £4a8toOva. b-& tk p'✓ottevnc.ao6O :2201 al d: e,, 4, So>'8 nerateka- 4 10-8 /t ',ia-' Why do you wish to become a Commission member?d �attettiA-W'. y What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? -7)e o -t carag pa/r o se. 4 /0 mc?4i. /wvc. Y the .041-Nentitni.o oar a1 A101412oca 4eite,4 . 7Aii 4 74) / , as / ; a el -Yin -013n_, / l�G���� Page 1 of 2 '� � d.L! Abeele4At-a y R.- GCA' OciAGPAN (/ % R.� ..• �ti 617 _ / /l t n . C /d.LDS • 7 Lb • • Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? _Yes /No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. a tt4 e/2ed . 3 t2 2a e -h At rr71. This Board/Commission meets on 7D esd 71 at 7: OzV p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? _Yes X No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? (o 6 7 Comments: v/ uyan/1 re -1724- / /lug'_•' / /I1 ✓... , • 44,E (P ,teems citAlfrk Signed: Date: Page 2 of 2 k(ef,fJda-Z `'v r (4/23/01) • • To the City of Hermosa Beach: I have long wanted to participate in my community. It is finally possible. My 23 years of experience in Corporate Interior design should be helpful in understanding the concerns and leadership of our city. My parents were educators. Public servants, my mother a high school English would say. They instilled a great sense of value in doing my best for others and the Golden Rule. A big life change: Seventeen years of commuting out of Hermosa Beach has ended for Lynne Pope. I drew a line and said it must be possible to gain back three hours of driving away. My granddaughter is in Hermosa Valley School and lives with us. My children have all bought homes in the area. One lives in Hawthorne, one in El Segundo and one in Redondo Beach. They all wished for Hermosa. The film Industry- though fascinating was not a perfect match for me. Six years of work and learning has given me understanding and appreciation for many people. The variable income was not for me. Real Estate -I joined Beverly Schaeffer & Associates. She has been the best teacher and mentor in my life. I finally feel balanced in my shoes. This is creative work, teamwork and people that I love. That's the Color of my Parachute! Remember that book; it was about finding the work that you love. I am doing well and getting involved right where I live. I am a past President of a Century City Service Club. We worked with schools and a scholarship program. I have taught Sunday school for 23 years. I have lived in Hermosa Beach since 1987 with my Interior Designer and surfer husband Bob Pope who moved here in 1960, and graduated from Mira Costa. We have three considering children iildrerinnd myfupplication. r grandchildren. I'm ready for our community. Thank you Sincerely, t�. Lynne Pope r c—e---_ • • LYNNE POPE 2044 Manhattan Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310-379-7571 863-7582 cell Interior Design L.A. Fitness- New Design prototype for 80 new buildings interiors 2002 Hughes, Citicorp, and Arco, Project Management Systems, Furniture and Art Move 1997 Panel Concepts -New Furniture Systems designed, Gold Medal Design Winner, NeoCon 1999 Gulfstream Aerospace and Clay Lacy Aviation Interior Design Projects Levi Strauss Interior Design, Apparel Marts and Corporate Offices in all major cities 1980-92 Princess Cruises Interior Design, Construction, furniture, finishes, and millwork 1976-94 World Cup Soccer Org, Design for LA and NYC offices with Alan Rothenberg1990-92 Automotive Showrooms in Irvine, Atlanta and Newark Pope and Associates Interior Space Planning and Design, Inc. 1986 -current Designers Adcock and Stock Inc.1976-1986 Vice President Interior Design CCIDC and NCIDC certification designation Interior Design, California and National Columbia School of Film and Television Executive Director of Work Study and Student Internship Program Instructor: Art Direction and Costume Design Loyola Law School: Assistant to Director of Work Study Television,Film and Commercials Development Assistant to Writer, Director, Producer Leetle Feesh Productions Read scripts, research and wrote coverage, finding co -writers on film projects, music Involved in casting, production and editing, worked with Agents, Managers and Producers Locations, LA, San Diego, Salt Lake City, Australia, France FOX Television Pilot 2002 USA Studio TV pilot development 1999-2002 COVER ME Universal/USA 1999 Shaun Cassidy Producer ALLIES Paramount/CBS Pi1ot1998 Anita Addison Co -Producer ROAR Universal/Fox 1997 Shaun Cassidy Producer AND THEN YOU DIE CBS Pilot 1996 Paul Kuria Producer Sundance Film Nominee, Production Designer/996 IN THE VINEYARD, Forrest Murray Producer, Casting CLOCKWATCHERS, Jill Sprecher Director, Set Painter Winfield Racing Team, NNDB Needham Australian Commercial, Art Director FX Commercial, and Women in Film -PSA, Art Director Academy Award Winning Thesis Film, Best Live Action Short 2000, Art Director 23 student films worked in all areas of production, costumes, visual, location, casting, music, editing Creator of film shown at AFI Graduation DGA and over 60 International Awards for films as Art Director, Production Design and Casting Play reading, Stanley Donen, Dir. Elaine May, Lee Grant and Marisa Tomei in New York 2002 Play readings, Joyce Van Patten, Milton Justice, Jack Heifner Sheila Levine is Living and Dead in New York, featured S.A.G. Awake and Sing- Dramalogue Award Set design 1996 Education American Film Institute, Masters of Fine Arts, 1997 Production Design Real Estate Licensed Agent, 2003 California State University, Los Angeles, BFA Fine Arts and Theatre Southern Methodist University and University of South Florida, Scholarship in Theatre and Art ONE PARCEL 4,000 S.F. SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL VAP \O. 26262 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 7, BLOCK 39, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGES 59 AND 60 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. SUSAN J. SWERDLOFF SUBDIVIDER RECORD OWNER : HEgmoSA OCEAN VILLAS, LLC.) A CALI ooRk)!R LIM.IrED LIA51L.ITY C01\ARW THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 3 UNITS WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ON APR._1~ _I} 2043 BEFORE ME, 6.•qE L ilk. ‘,/, ik441 A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED SLl4AJ . SA,4,1e L F PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES) AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. NOTARY PU FOR SAID E IN AND NAME: C#4ER4 L A. V�►R1, 'o MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 7 -'05 EASEMENT OF WARREN GILLELEN, HIS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGN EASEMENT HOLDER FOR WATER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617, PAGE 47 OF DEEDS. SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. EASEMENT OF WESTATES PETROLEUM COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION EASEMENT HOLDER FOR BORING WELL HOLES BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1962, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 3313. SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. t MBREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL CERTIFICATES HAVE BE FILED AND DEPOSITS HAVE BEEN MADE THAT ARE REQUIRED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 68492 AND 66493 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. EXECUTIVE OFFICER -CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGE S, STATE OF 9ALIFORNIA BY DMPUTy /Z- Z 2 - 03 /s7 w 0:Ess' 044< No. 30826 EXP. 03-31-04 C/V1L F CAL RECEIVED JAN 2 6 2004 COM. DEV. DEPT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF SUSAN J. SWERDLOFF ON 10-30-02 I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. GARY J. ROEHL R.C.E. 30826 EXPIRATION: 03-31 -04 RECORD DATA WAS TAKEN FROM THE FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, M.B. 1 -59-60 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. JAMES A. NOYES CITY ENGINEER .vf z'a3 DEPUTY R.C.E. d 202-73 EXPIRES 9-34 COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP, THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER COUNTY ENGINEER BY DEPUTY DATE RCE NO. EXPIRES CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE DAY OF , 20 APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 200 SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE SCALE: 1"=.20' SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS 3RD STREET BAR EL VA \O. 2626? IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA *e BLOCK 39 FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH M.B. 1 -59-60 TRACT NO. 31373 M. B. 836-11-12 50' 50' N 12°10'00"W 50' w w HERMOSA 50' FOR CONDOMINIUV PURPOSES N 77°50'00"E 4TH STREET S'LY LINE OF LOT 8 * AND S'LY LINE 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 N • • • • N 77°50'00"E 100.00' • 4,000 S.F. N 77°50'00"E • 100.00' • 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 N Z N'LY LINE OF LOT 6* 2ND STREET 2 0' 10' 0 0 0 N 2 0' 10' FD PK NAIL PER ** 10' w aa 10' FD SPK (NO TAG) PER **