Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/26/04CITY CLERK AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 6:00 p.m. - Council Chambers, City Hall 1315 Valley Drive MAYOR Art Yoon MAYOR PRO TEM J. R. Reviczky COUNCIL MEMBERS Sam Y. Edgerton Michael Keegan Peter Tucker CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman CITY MANAGER Stephen R. Burrell CITY ATTORNEY Michael Jenkins 1. SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION APPLICATIONS. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 20, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council decide whether or not to accept the following late applications for interviews and appointment consideration this evening: Ivan Mercer Application received October 17 R. Gregory McNally. Jr. Application received October 18 INTERVIEW APPLICANTS FOR: i PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION i APPLICATIONS ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA PACKET FOR OCTOBER 26, 2004 UNDER ITEM 8a APPOINTMENTS WILL BE MADE AT THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING THAT FOLLOWS THIS INTERVIEW MEETING. ADJOURNMENT 8 October 20, 2004 City Council Meeting October 26, 2004 Mayor and Members of the City Council SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION APPLICATIONS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council decide whether or not to accept the following late Public Works Commission applications (see attached) for interviews and appointment consideration this evening: Ivan Mercer Application received October 17 R. Gregory McNally, Jr. Application received October 18 Background: Pursuant to Council direction at its meeting of August 10, a notice announcing the term expiration of three seats on the Public Works Commission was posted at City Hall and on the City's web page on August 12 and was published in the Easy Reader August 19 and 26, with a filing deadline of October 5. Five applications were received during the filing period. The late applicants have been advised of the date, place and time of the scheduled interviews should the Council act at that time to accept their late applications. Elaine Doerfling, City Cl 1 • • PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION APPLICANTS Name • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATIO NAME OF COMMIISSION Address: Occupation/Profession: 1 f,Yt CN a 1 M oorvk �LY ?LUiL Woke, CErVT �'J� . OCT 1 8 2004 1-21 Crz+�.}�_ ! crtyar<• ,f R. ewer MCNalt1 fir. 201 - 2-(111k gee,+ Home Phone: to 3-14 3011 Name of Employer C1Y1 010Cf-cft-5, �� Bus. Phone: 3t0 ' 9JZO .5551 Address of Employer 1\ 6 (Q 1 S 'ANn V ic"1-e- Mrl . LOS Ano e 1 cs Co- Ot b b 4 C REFERENCES: Local: Mike, LiAct to i Professional: 'b 3 1 10,1c Other: 10'c e1r COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): Urian fel} vckcui' aSSoc ti 04 - 5ti" fvctnciseo - Pad. POO II 1o0)n Mena( t 131arL -- baht c'a44w of 6,0rylPr✓ct - PUNtL /I 4t &ark. - Pa51 Why do you wish to become a Commission//member? Dt, cot, aciivr, Vy?e 41J .{ ih Tlu COn f inu cct d tAiD p rre4& 1' l� ✓��I ?lot i P/1rl of /PNflOcu 156(.(k. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? To raM•f( araaft ic. G/( Cot/r)r���rer(I&„f )rnrfJe /r I � /rr;rrCiN. (,c>rr) rri�. /Lc(! ri; 0 �r-Y-. nrk/ (o!/mCf'. Page 1 of 2 • • Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could/be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes V No. (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. This Board/Commission meets on at any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes No p.m. Do you foresee How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? 1611 — l c 35 0,4,1 i ft (D - t r '5 e 4 Comments: C1QJ(M0c- Uu 1))f (L(, �5 +LJ (Orf✓mAniI i Was ifo l52(J ill aviz( is coko✓G r�t(y 14ite 0,0d 7 w;fl ✓a►>p au✓ Aar JhOw e` <<5 iS Phi �/Wft1 . C/41� tole f b amici alt ma11.6(5 �nnrt- arf ivel/ . Signed: i? , ,/ , /7)( Date: C'11 ht.V /2), Ua I✓l Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) A • • R. Gregory McNally Jr. 207 29`" Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310/374-3071 greg_mcnally@yahoo.com AREAS OF EXPERTISE Extensive knowledge of restaurant management and operations Restaurant site selection and lease negotiations Extraordinary ability to motivate and lead teams In-depth and successful crisis management experience Knowledge of city, county and state laws that regulate small businesses (Health codes, OSHA, board of equalization, alcoholic beverage control, labor, payroll and tax law) EXPERIENCES General Manager Daily Grill/Grill Concepts, Inc., Los Angeles, CA April 2003 to Present Grill Concepts, Inc. is a public traded restaurant company with 18 restaurants in 6 states. Successfully completed six week management training. Assigned to the Daily Grill La Cienega July, 2003. Stabilized sales levels and reduced operating costs. Successfully managed sales growth through 2003, raising net income 7% above previous year, and 7% above budget. Assigned to Daily Grill South Bay in April 2004. Developed management leadership training for senior staff in partnership with Chapman University. Completed staff certification of LEADS services training with the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Improved staff wine knowledge with Southern Wine and Spirits. Management Consultant and Interim General Manager Ein Stein's Restaurant and Brewery, Hermosa Beach, CA February 2002 to March 2003 Joined Ein Stein's Restaurant and Brewery after Board of Directors terminated the contract with their managing partners. Immediately implemented new cash control and banking systems and followed with cuts in marketing, entertainment and promotional expenses. Reduced menu size and increased quality and value. Directed brew master in increased beer quality and consistency. Worked with existing staff and management team through several levels of training. Training included beer production, menu development, service fundamentals and banquet management. Assisted owners in achieving long-term goals and exit strategy. Continued as Interim General Manager as owners searched for potential buyers. Navigated the business through sale process, transfer of permits, licensing changes and closing of accounts. Founder & General Partner, Anacapa Restaurant, Manhattan Beach, CA July 1998 to March 2002 Founder of Anacapa Restaurant, a sophisticated full service restaurant serving "coastal cuisine" in a seaside atmosphere. Developed the concept, business plan, and partnership agreement, and successfully raised capital to fund launch of operation. Ongoing responsibilities included all business decisions, marketing, promotions, community relations, accounting, purchasing and labor management. Successfully transitioned Anacapa Restaurant from full service dining focused business to special events, private parties and nightclub facility in January 2000. Completely re- designed business with an emphasis on an all-inclusive event experience, personal menu development, beverage specials, musical entertainment and personalized decorations, to maximize value of Class 1 Entertainment and Dance permit. Completed the sale of Anacapa Restaurant in March of 2002. • • Founder, Co -President & COO Oaxaca Inc. General Partner WA -HA -KA and Baton Rouge Restaurants, San Francisco, CA June 1989 to August 1999 Founder of San Francisco's Oaxaca Mexican Grill (WA -HA -KA) restaurants and the Baton Rouge Cajun Restaurant. Involved in all aspects of business, concept and business development, site evaluation, interior/exterior design, kitchen layout, operating systems, manuals and menu's. Ongoing responsibilities include strategic and tactical business decisions, marketing, promotions, community relations and all labor administration, motivation and guidance/supervision. This high- quality/quick-service multi -unit concept was met with critical and business success. This concept was one of the first of its kind, now a visible restaurant concept in every major U.S. market. MEMBERSHIPS California Restaurant Association Member, Board of Directors, Los Angeles Chapter EDUCATION Chapman University, Organizational Leadership, July 2004 to Present University of Arizona, Focus on Public Administration, August 1984 to January 1985 Santa Monica College, September 1982 to June 1984 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETEION Professional Cooking, California Culinary Academy, 1995 Serve Safe, Certified Food Handler, 2004 LEADS, Service Training, 2004 INTERESTS Food, wine, architecture and water sports PERFESSIONAL REFERENCES Dan Gordon, Owner, Gordon Biersch Brewery Bob Spivak, CEO, Grill Concepts, Inc. Selyn Yossyln, Marmalid Cafe, President, Board of Directors, CRA Los Angeles Chapter October 17, 2004 Richard D. Morgan, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Richard, I wish to submit my application for consideration for the open position of member to the Hermosa Beach Public Works Commission. I appreciate your time during my recent visit to your office. Hearing about the projects the city is currently working on was quite exciting and an effort I would like to be involved with. With twenty years of business experience as an owner and operator of small businesses, I feel I can bring a fair and .unbiased view of current and future projects. As a long time resident of Hermosa Beach I believe my involvement would be an asset to the city. I apologize for not returning my application sooner. My wife and I just had our first child and many things in my life were put on hold for a short time. I am very excited to know if the Pubic Works Commission is still in need of additional member. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Greg McNally 207-29`h Street Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Home (310) 374-3071 Mobile (310) 600-5594 Oct.11. 2004 5:56PM 4111th BaY Brokers Name • No.0135 P. 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION ii:thi;t_ Wok; ks e5510 .__Cyan Afar Address: 1731 Pot4' a'.rt thu X15! Occupation/Profession:. Pea 1 Q r 611 � om)ioa -1aaa Name of Employez 6, Ut'� E? Q��? •�+-1� • Bus. Phone:pI Address of Employer ) W ?C) Pae -r etae54'1114).9) M on4b &a, REFERENCES: j� earklik ^�Local: IA R1 S1 9 na►�Qr111D etttN fr\ Oral it 1051419" /� � 1 Professional: kk4.Xft9 LOODA 5 8 $1 &n66 & B fe 'fir /toe►afe 375 09P Home Phone: (3 ID) f7).- IN10514 tea.Gle% Other: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): 0OY1rt 0� Centum 60,1kar 5pee'&1ize titimoAl fik. wrh •, at\ vol ball nodelx,valut,l. ncligleA many b b/off efiet ;za+'cn ki)5. AVPNext 600ie#6050.'11160 IIah a klso h V �r $ S k91* Wt chat)-.- 4)16 Al oor edortJe Brno 1 va ed ma y �vc�' y �.,, 11 Why do you wish to become a Commission member? 5 , nee Y10.VQ 1avea her'.. i gefr#1195Cit tP.an1ti 1_ have 11ev% Lifer 4C I A hdL rt) V614) te re>n I� -feela.�sew, th`� /,'blhdli priertf -3 `( k 101,1A. fan ion'A6 atbov, a as�-F�✓c ea$loak -49r DKr -Fawn and ettu e, Q What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? hi It, I 1,eftople of- }der Wl.,..,. ...., r -kb k tcPrG%n-tr.A Z -Feel ;g- lum& Ice ynawij 67.16\- valuable 4ctls k4064,1 el ye a vut � -) \Me.iu e �- 5 kneltel 9 e-. Page 1. oft it�i b kW.' �3q‘ �o6e 0,4Fos�fiye -bro;hk;hg o emir comp* AH1 j Oct.17. 2004 5:56PM SoulBav Brokers • No.0735 P. 3 Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which cou d be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. Bk y1;a,rlIe44 IRuve"r' of m (FGA )01 Reievede 1 ( acivi4f t'1 1A)04,1, fr, QeA ekkiA D001 -ado 2 14 Ft 1,t.Yo9 Znoa: Vio LAW Bit 1 X . Y1�U►`�IC C; -1-y \OOct- ()Loner Opya3or )a AV f GaSSoifa41'or1off 11) $4ein4k,, - 2a0P - Arc./ t AV PN ck PIT( m,1ee 4 5vockkf. gay Bee j s � e. i 4 J, - V4eYner 6,111 ,p,# �-o rexe 4, Wit 4.64914:4 of eaf-s 4 eti,ie.s. This Board/Commission meets on'i � Iasi •64.'1• 'at , 7 00 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes )C_ No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? 'i PICC- atra Comments:ThoyK Ott �toY GOnSIAP�►i?y rn° as A eahe1,J44e '4r i1�1Q,4 AA I Work," (;orrnlr g5;an. I toil) Jo talfrel ►)Nq +h o100; 4-9 C1tf6t. a )4- ve top& epi/il<hnment and a l ear pate istr itofe totix J1mi'Ii`41 • - IL . qmin Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) Oct.17. 2004 5:55PM 'uth BaY Brokers -,ter. "�'` .M■�� A SOIUH-1 BAY BROKERS INCORPORATED No.0735 P. 1 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION DATE: /a "17" 4`4 TO: COMPANY NAME: C; o -f 1 ergeat+k FAX NUMBER: aro -371- 6 I'Uo MESSAGE: A pfIkatiol.. Vor S)V\AlL k)o 'k Pl ei►e. 1.e* Ole kv,ocu +Le. Yec 4+0 . k€»1bmIiig O 4.h\sL 4.h\ 1165 oh `t' 60eYIpIunietry NAME OF SENDER: lvO.Cr) SKp TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 3 SOUTH BAY BROKERS, INC. 1640 Pacific Coast Hwy. REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277 TELEPHONE: (310) 375.0583 FAX: (310) 375.9616 Fax rnvpr.dxr • • "Unhappiness is the ultimate form of self-indulgence." - Tom Robbins AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, October 26, 2004 - Council Chambers, City Hall 1315 Valley Drive 7:10 p.m. MAYOR Art Yoon MAYOR PRO TEM J. R. Reviczky COUNCIL MEMBERS Sam Y. Edgerton Michael Keegan Peter Tucker CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman CITY MANAGER Stephen R. Burrell CITY ATTORNEY Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer. City Council agendas and staff reports are available for your review on the City's web site located at www.hermosabch.org CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF OCTOBER 12, 2004: NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda as a business item. 1 • • 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction, or to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar, may do so at this time. Comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Comments from the public are limited to three minutes per speaker. Members of the audience may also speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; and, 3) during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. The City Council acknowledges receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in written communications. The Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. NO WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 4, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on October 12, 2004. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file memorandum from Finance Directors Viki Copeland, regarding the September 2004 financial reports. (e) Recommendation to receive and file notice of closed claims. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated October 13, 2004. (f) Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of October 19, 2004. 2 C' (g) • • Recommendation to deny the following claims and refer them to the City's Liability Claims Administrator. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated October 14, 2004. Claimant: Southern California Edison Date of Loss: 09-09-04 Date Filed: 10-07-04 Allegation: Property damage Claimant: Kim, John Y. Date of Loss: 04-21-04 Date Filed: 10-18-04 Allegation: Trip and fall Claimant: Villa, Edilberto Date of Loss: 05-12-04 Date Filed: 10-18-04 Allegation: Personal Injury (h) Recommendation to receive and file Project Status Report. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated September 20, 2004. (i) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving final map #26814 for a 2 -unit condo at 538 and 540 Manhattan Avenue. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 19, 2004. (j) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving final map #26936 for a 2 -unit condo at 1449 Monterey Boulevard. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 19, 2004. (k) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving final map #27099 for a 2 -unit condo at 1016 and 1018 17th Street. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 19, 2004. (I) (m) Recommendation to approve the plans, specifications and estimate for Project No. CIP 02-108 Street Improvements — 2"d Street between Pacific Coast Highway and Monterey Boulevard between Herondo Street and 4th Street; authorize staff to proceed to advertise for bids; and, authorize the City Clerk to post Notice Inviting Sealed Bids for said project. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated October 18, 2004. Recommendation to approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the MTA and the City of Hermosa Beach for establishing a capital reserve account for the allocation of Proposition C Local Return Program Funding toward the Pier Avenue Street Improvement Project (CIP No. 04-116) and authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated October 18, 2004. t�► • I (n) Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of October 5, 2004. (o) Recommendation to approve the expenditure of $18,861.25 for the purchase of two speed radar signs to be placed on the Strand at 11th Street and 14th Street and appropriate $20,000 from Transportation Development Act Funds for purchase and installation costs. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated October 20, 2004. (P) Recommendation to approve the implementation of a New Year's Eve Celebration on December 31, 2004 and approve proposal for musical performance conducted by "Big Band 2000" from 8:00pm to 12:15am. Memorandum from Community Resources Department dated October 19, 2004. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 04-1243: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CORRECTING ERRORS MADE IN THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 02-1221, AMENDING SECTION 17.44.090 -TO REMOVE LEASED OFF-SITE PARKING AS AN OPTION FOR REQUIRED PARKING, AND AMENDING SECTION 17.28.020 — TO REMOVE STORAGE AND MINI - STORAGE AS PERMITTED USES, AND TO REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR CERTAIN MANUFACTURING USES IN THE M-1 ZONE. For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 13, 2004. b. ORDINANCE NO. 04-1244: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A DAYTIME CURFEW FOR MINORS AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 13, 2004. 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. a. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A THREE FOOT SIDE YARD RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED FIVE FEET AT 3410 HERMOSA AVENUE AND 111 34TH STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 18, 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Deny the requested variance. • • b. CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF 2005 ST. PATRICK'S DAY PARADE AND FESTIVAL TO BE HELD SATURDAY, MARCH 12, 2005 AND SUNDAY, MARCH 13, 2005. Memorandum from Community Resources Department dated October 19, 2004. PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approve the annual Saint Patrick's Day Parade and Festival for one day only, March 12, 2005; approve the event contract and street closures; and, approve fee waiver/funding as requested. c. REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 061822 FOR AN 18,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING CONTAINING 54 COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 200 PIER AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 19, 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: To approve the project subject to conditions as contained in the resolution. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. REQUEST TO RECONSIDER OBJECTION TO DANCING AT TJ CHARLYZ. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 14, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the attached letter requesting reconsideration your action of May 25, 2004 which was to write a letter to ABC objecting to a change in the ABC license to allow dancing at TJ Charlyz. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT — SOUTH BAY CITIES COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 21, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the amendments to the Joint Powers Agreement for the SBCCOG and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. 5 .1' • • 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. VACANCIES — BOARDS & COMMISSIONS — APPOINTMENT TO PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION~ Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 20, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: Appoint from among the applicants interviewed earlier this evening to fill three expired terms ending October 31, 2008. b. VACANCIES — BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS — CABLE TELEVISION ADVISORY COMMISSION. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 20, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council schedule a meeting prior to the regular meeting of November 9, 2004 for the purpose of interviewing applicants, with appointments to be made that evening at the regular meeting. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. NONE ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, October 12, 2004, at the hour of 7:10 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Merna Marshall ROLL CALL: Present: Edgerton, Keegan, Reviczky, Tucker, Mayor Yoon Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilmember Tucker congratulated the Houston Astros for advancing to the next level in the playoffs, noting that Morgan Ensberg, who attended school and played little league in Hermosa Beach, is on the team. He said the early voting program for the November 4 election begins October 20 and the Redondo Beach Library is one of the locations. Mayor Yoon announced that October 15 is Latino Aids Awareness Day and said a proclamation prepared for recognition of this day would be mailed to organizers. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: There was no written correspondence. Coming forward at this time to address the Council were: Jean Cullen — Woman's Club of Hermosa Beach, invited the City Council and the community to the annual Pancake Breakfast Sunday, October 24, from 8 a.m. to noon at the Clark Building, with tickets at $8 each or two for $15 and children under 2 free; the Council was then presented with personalized aprons made by Club member Merna Marshall; Laura Raymond — Hermosa Beach Friends of the Parks, presented Council with Halloween treats and invitations to the second annual Pumpkins in the Park event Saturday, October 16 from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at Fort Lots of Fun, a family event with pumpkins, cookies, raffle prizes, and an opportunity to learn about the park plans and provide input; and Albert Roman — described support in the United States opposing persecution of practitioners of Falun Gong in China and invited the Council to attend an award winning film dramatizing this situation, being shown at the Crest Theatre in Westwood on October 29. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (h), with the exception of the following items, which were removed for discussion in item 4, but are shown in order for clarity: (d) Tucker and (f) Reviczky. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 10-12-04 Page 11498 ii (a) • • RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2004. Action: To approve as presented the City Council minutes of the Regular meeting of September 28, 2004. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 38033 THROUGH 38178. Action: To ratify the check register, as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file tentative future agenda items, as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2004. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Tucker for separate discussion later in the meeting for a clarification regarding item 6(b) on the Public Works Commission minutes. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of September 15, 2004. Motion Tucker, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO WAIVE THE $236 BANNER FEE FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH WOMAN'S CLUB ANNUAL PANCAKE BREAKFAST ON OCTOBER 24, 2004. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 6, 2004. (f) Action: To waive the $236 banner fee for the Hermosa Beach Woman's Club pancake breakfast on October 24, 2004, as recommended by staff. RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT DONATIONS OF 20 TWELVE MONTH GYM MEMBERSHIPS TO BE AUCTIONED OR SOLD AND USED FOR THE SUMMER 2005 CONCERT SERIES (WILL BE APPROPRIATED IN 2005) AT AN ESTIMATED VALUE OF $10,000 FROM 24 HOUR FITNESS; $90 IN AN ANONYMOUS EMPLOYEE DONATION FROM WELLS FARGO COMMUNITY SUPPORT CAMPAIGN TO BE USED, FOR TEEN PROGRAM SUPPLIES; AND, $30 IN AN ANONYMOUS EMPLOYEE DONATION FROM WELLS FARGO COMMUNITY SUPPORT CAMPAIGN TO BE USED FOR TEEN PROGRAM SUPPLIES. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated October 5, 2004. City Council Minutes 10-12-04 Page 11499 (g) • • This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky in order to acknowledge and thank the donors. Action: To accept the following donations: 1) Twenty 12 -month gym memberships to be auctioned or sold and used for the Summer 2005 Concert series (will be appropriated in 2005) at an estimated value of $10,000 from 24 Hour Fitness; 2) $90 anonymous employee donation from Wells Fargo Community Support Campaign to be used for Teen Program supplies; and 3) $30 anonymous employee donation from Wells Fargo Community Support Campaign to be used for Teen Program supplies. Motion Reviczky, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF REDONDO BEACH AND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FOR SANTA MONICA BAY BEACHES BACTERIA TMDL SHORELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated October 5, 2004. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve the Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Redondo Beach and the City of Hermosa Beach for the Santa Monica Bay Beaches Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Shoreline Water Quality Monitoring; 2) Approve funding contributions to the City of Redondo Beach for retaining the services of a private laboratory that has the expertise, qualifications and equipment to perform storm water quality monitoring services in the amount of $5,072; and 3) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL OF EMERGENCY PLANNING CONSULTANTS, SAN DIEGO, CA, TO PROVIDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH A LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN COMPLIANT WITH THE DISASTER MITIGATION ACT OF 2000 AND A MULTI -HAZARD FUNCTIONAL PLAN COMPLIANT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA STANDARDIZATION EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; AND, AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER OF $30,000 FROM THE PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNT (001-2201-4201). - Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated October 4, 2004. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Accept the Proposal of Emergency Planning Consultants, San Diego, CA, to provide the development of both a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan compliant with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and a Multi -Hazard City Council Minutes 10-12-04 Page 11500 • • Functional Plan compliant with the State of California Standardization Emergency Management System; and 2) Authorize the transfer of $30,000 from the Prospective Expenditures Account to the Fire Department Contract Services Account (001-2201- 4201). 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 2 (d) and (f) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. At 7:23 p.m., the order of the agenda went to item 7(a). 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A VARIANCE TO ALLOW GREATER THAN 65% LOT COVERAGE; TO ALLOW GREATER THAN 100% INCREASE IN VALUATION WHILE MAINTAINING A NONCONFORMING FRONT YARD; AND TO ALLOW REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NOT ADJACENT TO A PRIMARY LIVING AREA AT 311 31ST STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 4, 2004. Supplemental information received from Director Blumenfeld on October 12, 2004. Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 7:46 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Barbara Zondiros — appellant, said the small lot (30'x70') and narrow ten -foot wide alley represented exceptional circumstances; said 12 to 15 similar variances had been granted in the area, with one home receiving two variances; said they did not want to position their living quarters on the second floor because they interact with their neighbors and their children play out front and did not want to tear down the house; said a three-story house was not feasible because the height restriction would require a portion of the house to be underground; said they planned a two -car garage in the rear with additional parking space and felt the proposed plan was the best solution for providing a modest home to meet the needs of their family; said that they had the support of their neighbors; City Council Minutes 10-12-04 Page 11501 Tom Zondiros — appellant, said they simply wanted to enlarge their home to a reasonable size so they could raise their family, noting they had two small children, and had no intention of ever selling; Alan Cook — Hermosa Beach, spoke in support of his neighbor's request; said there was a real sense of community on this walk street; said the proposed remodeling would not create a very large house; Lawrence Noone — Hermosa Beach, also spoke in support of the request for enlarging the Zondiros home in this great neighborhood; John Thomas — Hermosa Beach, said he had lived in his home since 1988 and raised his family there, so he knew that homeowners need every inch of space they can get for their homes with such small lots; and Mark Wing — Hermosa Beach, spoke in support of the project; said that the Zondiros family was not proposing a huge structure. The public hearing closed at 7:54 p.m. Action: To overturn the Planning Commission decision and grant variances to the lot coverage requirement and maximum allowable valuation increase for a nonconforming structure in order to allow an addition and remodel of an existing single-family dwelling, resulting in 70.9% lot coverage rather than the maximum 65% and a 148.1% valuation increase rather than the maximum 100% at 311 31st Street, and directed staff to return with a resolution documenting this action. Motion Edgerton, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Keegan and Reviczky. Further Action: To direct the Planning Commission to review and consider a possible amendment of the building regulations for the Shakespeare Tract, specifically with regard to the issues of setbacks and open space. Motion Reviczky, second Keegan. The motion passed by consensus. b. TEXT AMENDMENT CORRECTIONS TO SECTION 17.44-090 -- OFF- STREET PARKING LOCATION AND SECTION 17.28.020 -- M-1 PERMITTED USE LIST. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated September 1, 2004. Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:14 p.m. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 8:14 p.m. Action: To waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 04-1243 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CORRECTING ERRORS MADE IN THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 02-1221, AMENDING SECTION 17.44.090 -TO REMOVE LEASED OFF- SITE PARKING AS AN OPTION FOR REQUIRED PARKING, AND City Council Minutes 10-12-04 Page 11502 • • AMENDING SECTION 17.28.020 — TO REMOVE STORAGE AND MINI - STORAGE AS PERMITTED USES, AND TO REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR CERTAIN MANUFACTURING USES IN THE M-1 ZONE." Motion Reviczky, second Keegan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. CONSIDERATION OF MEASURES TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH AB939 WASTE DIVERSION MANDATE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 6, 2004. Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Authorize staff to begin the process for joining the Los Angeles Area Regional Agency for AB 939 •diversion and disposal reporting purposes; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 04-6359, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REDUCTION AND RECYCLING OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE"; 3) Adopt Resolution No. 04-6360, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AUTOMATED COMMERCIAL RECYCLING TOTER PROGRAM AND 5% COMMERCIAL TRASH TO TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM." Motion Reviczky, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. b. ADOPTION OF TRUANCY ORDINANCE. Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin dated October 5, 2004. Police Chief Lavin presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded•to Council questions. Action: To waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 04-1244, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A DAYTIME CURFEW FOR MINORS AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." Motion Reviczky, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Edgerton. At 8:37 p.m., the order of the agenda went to item 7(c). 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Council Minutes 10-12-04 Page 11503 • a. REDONDO UNION HIGH SCHOOL CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION SPONSORSHIP. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 6, 2004. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To authorize a $1,000 donation for the Redondo Union High School Centennial Celebration. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Tucker. At 7:27 p.m., the order of agenda went to item 8(a). b. COMMUNITY ENERGY PARTNERSHIP TORCHIERE LAMP TRADE-IN PROGRAM ON NOVEMBER 20, 2004. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 6, 2004. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions, saying staff would display the lamps at a future meeting. Action: To receive and file as informational item, as recommended by staff. Motion Edgerton, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 8:52 p.m., the order of the agenda went to item 8(b). c. E -NEWSLETTER. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 6, 2004. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions Action: To approve, as recommended by staff, the recipient database list use and the general guidelines for content and approval and direct the City Manager to sign the month-to-month service agreement; and appropriate $3,500 to cover the cost of the service contract for seven months. Motion Reviczky, second Keegan. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Mayor Yoon. d. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE TERM OF THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT TO APRIL 30, 2005. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated October 7, 2004. Mayor Yoon recused himself and left the dais and the room at 8:40 p.m. due to a potential conflict of interest since his employment involves cable TV. City Council Minutes 10-12-04 Page 11504 • • City Manager Burrell presented the staff recommendation and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. Action: To deny a six-month extension and maintain service from Adelphia on a month-to-month basis. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Keegan and the absence of Mayor Yoon. At 8:50 p.m., the order of the agenda went to item 7(b), with all Councilmembers present. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. VACANCIES — BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS — EXPIRATION OF TERMS — PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 6, 2004. City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To schedule a meeting at 6:00 p.m., prior to the regular meeting of Tuesday, October 26, 2004, for the purpose of interviewing applicants, with appointments to be made that evening at the regular meeting. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 7:30 p.m., the order of the agenda went to public hearing item 5(a). b. PROPOSITION 68. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 6, 2004. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions Proposed Action: To take a position opposing Proposition 68. Motion Keegan, second Mayor Yoon. Mayor Yoon subsequently withdrew his second and the motion died for lack of a second. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL a. REQUEST FROM MAYOR YOON FOR CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF A CONFORMING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR SUNSHINE CANYON LANDFILL AND A LETTER OF SUPPORT. Action: The consensus of the Council was to monitor the situation but not adopt a resolution or write a letter of support of a conforming conditional use permit application for Sunshine Canyon Landfill. City Council -Minutes 10-12-04 Page 11505 • S ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on September 14, 2004. 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 552 11th Place, APN: 4187-020-044 Negotiating Parties: Stephen Burrell & Stephen Grossman Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION — The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, October 12, 2004, at the hour of 8:59 p.m. to a closed session. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION — The Closed Session convened on Tuesday, October 12, 2004, at the hour of 9:10 p.m. At the hour of 9:20 p.m., the Closed Session adjourned to the Regular Meeting. ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS —There were no decisions made requiring a public announcement. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, October 12, 2004, at the hour of 9:21 p.m. to an Adjourned Regular Meeting at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 26, 2004 for the purpose of conducting Public Works Commission applicant interviews, to be followed by the regular meeting of the same date to be held at 7:10 p.m. City Council Minutes ejuty City Clerk 10-12-04 Page 11506 vchlist Check Register Page: 1 10/07/2004 4:53:03PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38179 10/7/2004 00029 A-1 COAST RENTALS 353185 38180 10/7/2004 08955 AAE INC. 13573 • 38181 10/7/2004 12482 ACCURINT 1114400-2004 38182 10/7/2004 12406 ADVANCED INFRASTRUCTURE 2280 2320 Scissorlift Rental - Sept 04 001-4204-4309 228.30 Total : 228.30 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 001-3104-4201 850.00 Total : 850.00 Background Information Services/9/04 001-2101-4201 28.00 Total : 28.00 SEWER & MANHOLE EQUIPMENT REPLACEM 160-3102-4309 MANHOLD LIFTER HOOKS 160-3102-4309 217.94 215.59 Total : 433.53 38183 10/7/2004 09366 AQUA FLO 266982 Irrigation Supplies/9/04 001-6101-4309 73.86 276762 Irrigation Supplies/9/04 001-6101-4309 520.55 276895 Irrigation Supplies/9/04 • 001-6101-4309 519.94 Total : 1,114.35 38184 10/7/2004 02487 ARCH WIRELESS N7896291J Pager Services/Oct 04 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 715-1206-4201 Total : 38185 10/7/2004 00407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY 28349 Lock Repair 001-4204-4309 9067 Keys made for Comm Ctr. 001-4204-4309 1 14.06 7.49 8.14 29.69 117.40 2b vchlist Check Register Page: 2 10/07/2004 4:53:03PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38185 10/7/2004 00407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY (Continued) 9110 9182 • 6 Master Locks 001-6101-4309 Keys made 110-3302-4305 38186 10/7/2004 12843 BIRD BARRIER AMERICA 298435 BIRD SCARE FLASH TAPE 001-6101-4309 38187 10/7/2004 00034 BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORPORATIC 282011 EVIDENCE ENVELOPES 001-2101-4305 282012 EVIDENCE ENVELOPES 001-2101-4305 282016 PERSONNEL COMPLAINT FORMS 001-2101-4305 38188 10/7/2004 08338 CALIF.MFG. INFORMATION SYSTED 120503 Video Systems Consulting/9/20-9/27/04 153-2106-5402 120504 IT Systems Consulting/9/27/04 150-2113-5401 57.74 7.79 Total : 188.78 101.72 Total : 101.72 172.61 214.29 70.36 Total : 457.26 2,181.25 312.50 Total : 2,493.75 38189 10/7/2004 12861 CHEMSEARCH 042992 BUILDING MAINTENANCE MATERIALS/9/04 001-4204-4309 042993 BUILDING MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-4204-4309 Total : 348.91 117.93 466.84 38190 10/7/2004 00153 CINTAS CORPORATION 426479521 Uniform Rental - Sept 04 001-4202-4314 91.42 426482536 Uniform Rental - Sept 04 001-4202-4314 96.42 426485501 Uniform Rental - Sept 04 001-4202-4314 94.42 Page: 2 4.-...�..-a. vchlist Check Register Page: 3 10/0712004 4:53:03PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38190 10/7/2004 00153 CINTAS CORPORATION (Continued) 426488544 Uniform rental - Sept 04 001-4202-4314 98.92 Total : 381.18 191 10/7/2004 05935 CLEAN STREET 40960 CITY WIDE STREET CLEANING/9/04 001-3104-4201 15,929.42 Total : 15,929.42 38192 10/7/2004 07809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 55069685 Office Supplies/9/04 001-1208-4305 55292833 Office Supplies/9/04 001-1208-4305 55293590 9 THOMAS GUIDES 001-2201-4305 55326844 Returned Merchandise/9/04 001-1208-4305 796.59 144.08 251.61 -530.98 Total : 661.30 38193 10/7/2004 11398 DEBILIO DISTRIBUTORS,INC 156473 Prisoners Meals/9/04 001-2101-4306 114.44 158016 Prisoners Meals/10/04 001-2101-4306 184.67 Total : 299.11 1,030.61 1,030.61 38195 10/7/2004 00122 DUNCAN PARKING TECHNOLOGIE 21773 Replacement Keys for Collection Carts 110-3302-4309 186.05 Total : 186.05 38196 10/7/2004 12883 ECOLINE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 20836 ANTI GRAFFITI MATERIAU9/04 001-3104-4309 159.38 Total : 159.38 38194 10/7/2004 00267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATI 168455 Signal & Light Maint/8/04 105-2601-4251 Total : 3 Page: 3 vchlist Check Register Page: 4 10/07/2004 4:53:03PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38197 10/7/2004 00165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PART sm #25 Auto Parts Purchase/9/04 715-4202-4311 6.12 715-3104-4311 256.75 715-4206-4309 52.38 • 715-2101-4311 578.25 715-3302-4311 2.61 715-4201-4311 5.49 001-2021 17.54 001-2022 -17.54 715-4206-4311 -42.27 Total : 859.33 38198 10/7/2004 07853 EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING & EQUIP 6451 CLEAN & VIDEO CITY SEWER YSTEM/9/04 160-3102-4201 19,891.30 Total : 19,891.30 38199 10/7/2004 12729 ENFACT SOLUTIONS, INC. 1013 ADMINISTRATION OF STORMWATER PROGRJ 160-3102-4201 4,420.00 Total : 4,420.00 38200 10/7/2004 12841 ESSCO SOUTH BAY, INC. 2623464-00 LIGHT FIXTURES/COMMUNITY CRT RMS 1 & 2 001-4204-4309 1,183.02 001-2021 22.27 • 001-2022 -22.27 Total : 1,183.02 38201 10/7/2004 10709 FIRE MASTER 121256094 Fire Alarm Service/9/04 001-4204-4321 210.00 Total : 210.00 38202 10/7/2004 09531 FIRSTLINE, LLC 9882 Medical Glove Purchase/9/04 001-2201-4309 152.83 Total : 152.83 38203 10/7/2004 10306 GAGLIA, MICK 2101-16243 Lunches/Post Class/10/18-10/22/04 001-2101-4312 40.00 Total : 40.00 Page: 4 vchlist Check Register Page: 5 10/07/2004 4:53:03PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38204 10/7/2004 04108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, IN 10/06/04 Worker's Comp Claims/10/01/04 705-1217-4324 Total : 16,475.00 16,475.00 38205 10/7/2004 09136 HERMOSA AUTOMOTIVE 017829 Smog Inspection & Certification 715-2101-4311 39.25 III 017830 Smog Inspection & Certification 715-2101-4311 39.25 017831 Smog Inspection & Certification 715-2101-4311 39.25 017832 Smog Inspection & Certification 715-2101-4311 39.25 017833 Smog Inspection & Certification 715-4202-4311 39.25 017834 Smog Inspection & Certification 715-2101-4311 39.25 Total : 235.50 38206 10/7/2004 03432 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1239931 Small Tools & Janitorial Supplies/9/04 001-4204-4309 202.03 2019406 Building Supplies/8/04 301-8630-4201 472.68 2224906 Building Supplies/8/04 • 2224907 105-2601-4309 122.80 Small Hand Tools/8/04 001-3104-4309 285.96 6115466 Storage Crates/9/22 001-2201-4305 81.43 6214340 Landscape Material/ Planters 9/04 001-6101-4309 165.88 6235503 Hardware Purchases/9/04 001-6101-4309 90.39 7122036 Ladder Purchase/9/04 001-4204-4309 128.82 8238654 Electrical Supplies/9/04 105-2601-4309 213.18 Page: 5 5 vchlist V Check Register Page: 6 10/07/2004 4:53:03PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38206 10/7/2004 03432 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 8243696 Plastic Storage Containers/9/04 001-2201-4305 9207 10/7/2004 12859 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTE 264687 BATTERIES FOR HAND HELD RADIOS 001-2201-4309 Total : Total : 38208 10/7/2004 04908 JAMESTOWN PRESS 5730 CONSTRUCTION RULES SIGNS PRINTED 001-4201-4305 5739 Business Card Purchase/9/04 001-1208-4305 Total : 38209 10/7/2004 10820 JENKINS & HOGIN,LLP 11605 Legal Fees - Pitchess Motions 001-1131-4201 11606 Legal Fees - General 001-1131-4201 11607 Legal Fees - Stop Oil 001-1131-4201 11608 LEGAL FEES RE: LAND USE/ZONING/9/04 • 001-1131-4201 Total : 38210 10/7/2004 10496 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 202737230 Copier Usage/Sept 04 001-4601-4201 001-1208-4201 001-2201-4201 110-3302-4201 Total : 38211 10/7/2004 00151 L.A. CO SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT 71087 Arrestee Processing Fee - Aug 04 001-2101-4251 Total : 38212 10/7/2004 08441 LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. 2001617 APPRAISAL SERVICES 102.84 1,866.01 137.45 137.45 159.91 162.38 322.29 30.00 5,431.00 19.50 518.00 5,998.50 140.40 183.92 40.83 19.85 385.00 291.68 291.68 Page: 6 vchlist Check Register Page: 7 10/07/2004 4:53:03PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38212 10/7/2004 08441 LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. (Continued) 001-4101-4201 Total : 4,000.00 4,000.00 38213 10/7/2004 11452 LEHNER/MARTIN,INC 901496 Helium Tank Rental - Sept 04 001-4601-4308 8.40 • 995595 Helium Tank Rental/7/04 001-4601-4308 8.40 Total : 16.80 38214 10/7/2004 11403 LITTLE TYKES COMMERCIAL 044793205 REPLACEMENT TOY AT SOUTH PARK 001-6101-4309 766.72 Total : 766.72 38215 10/7/2004 11258 LOS ANGELES SHERIFF'S OFFICE 2101-16242 Tuition/Gaglia & Phillips 10/18-10/22/04 001-2101-4312 108.00 Total : 108.00 38216 10/7/2004 10681 MAYNOR, DONALD H. DHM 2257 LEGAL RE: UUT 1ST QTR 001-1202-4201 1,250.00 Total : 1,250.00 38217 10/7/2004 10324 MBIA MUNI SERVICES COMPANY UUT20000834 1ST QRT UUT COMPLIANCE/ 04/05 001-1202-4201 1,250.00 •Total : 1,250.00 38218 10/7/2004 04138 MEERSAND, KENNETH A. 10/05/04 City Prosecutor Services/9/04 001-1132-4201 9,480.00 Total : 9,480.00 38219 10/7/2004 12513 MOOTE ASSOC., INC, PAULA. 22626 INDEPENDENT REVIEW/BUILDING DEPT 001-2024 1,970.01 Total : 1,970.01 38220 10/7/2004 10098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 371554311-03 Cell Phone Usage/8/22-9/21/04 001-2201-4304 324.03 Total : 324.03 Page: 7 vchlist Check Register Page: 8 10/07/2004 4:53:03PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38221 10/7/2004 00093 OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 38222 10/7/2004 11574 PHILLIPS, LAN DON 38223 10/7/2004 11934 POWER CHEVROLET 11405 11430 2101-16244 123786 124005 124040 124484 38224 10/7/2004 08914 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS CORP. 0063704 -IN 38225 10/7/2004 03428 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION 27177065 38226 10/7/2004 11008 SHIELDS SEWER CONTRACTING 10617 38227 10/7/2004 09656 SHRED IT CALIFORNIA 38228 10/7/2004 11831 SIR SPEEDY 333364697 AUTO REPAIRS/8/04 715-2201-4311 Replace P/S Pump 715-2101-4311 Lunches/Post Class/10/18-10/22 001-2101-4312 Auto Parts Purchase - Sept 04 715-2101-4311 Auto Parts Purchase - Sept 04 715-2101-4311 Auto Parts Purchase - Sept 04 715-2101-4311 Auto Parts Purchase - Sept 04 715-2101-4311 Bench for Noble Park 001-6101-5402 Auto Parts Machine Cleaned - Sept 04 715-4206-4201 Emergency Repair/Sewer Main/9/04 160-3102-4201 Shredding Services/9/04 001-2101-4201 10792 Municipal Code Books Copied/9/04 Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : 2,146.86 172.12 2,318.98 40.00 40.00 166.94 17.41 12.99 25.77 223.11 1,451.63 1,451.63 217.34 217.34 950.00 950.00 95.00 95.00 Page: 8 8 vchlist Check Register Page: 9 10107/2004 4:53:03PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38228 10/7/2004 11831 SIR SPEEDY (Continued) 001-1121-4305 196.04 Total : 196.04 200.00 Total : 200.00 CARPET IN TRAILBLAZER REAR PANEL 715-2101-5403 77.48 Total : 77.48 2,300.00 Total : 2,300.00 83.99 38229 10/7/2004 06211 SMITH OILWELL SERVICES 10/01/04 Oil Well Maint/Sept 04 001-1101-4201 • 38230 10/7/2004 10960 SOUTH BAY AUTO UPHOLSTERY 3515 38231 10/7/2004 10764 SOUTH BAY CENTER FOR 093004 DISPUTE RESOLUTION/04/05 001-1132-4201 38232 10/7/2004 10532 SOUTH BAY FORD 48451 Auto Part Purchase/9/04 715-4201-4311 49106 Auto Part Purchase/9/04 715-2101-4311 26.18 Total : 110.17 38233 10/7/2004 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C 2-01-1471-51 Electric Billing/9/04 001-3104-4303 1,027.83 • 2-01-414-107 Electric Billing/9/04 001-4204-4303 5,807.80 2-01-414-215 Electric Bill/9/04 001-6101-4303 2,875.81 2-01-414-374 Electric Billing/9/04 105-2601-4303 35.13 2-01-414-399 Electric Billing/9/04 160-3102-4303 77.96 2-01-414-428 Electric Billing/9/04 105-2601-4303 256.44 2-23-725-442 Electric Billing - Sept 04 001-4204-4303 11,220.10 Page: 9 vchlist Check Register Page: 10 10/07/2004 4:53:03PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38233 10/7/2004 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C(3Gontinued) Total : 21,301.07 38234 10/7/2004 10412 STERICYCLE 2943802 Medical Waste Disposal - Sept 04 001-2101-4201 92.97 Total : 92.97 • 38235 10/7/2004 04162 TORRANCE LOCK & KEY 157063 Car Keys Made/9/04 001-2101-4309 103.50 Total : 103.50 38236 10/7/2004 00123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE Sept 04 Hardware Purchase - Sept 04 105-2601-4309 46.29 001-6101-4309 49.93 001-3104-4309 165.82 001-2201-4309 123.09 001-4204-4309 439.31 110-3302-4305 21.36 001-2021 93.97 001-2022 -93.97 Total : 845.80 38237 10/7/2004 08207 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 951-808-8100 Underground Service Alert/9/04 • 160-3102-4201 57.40 Total : 57.40 38238 10/7/2004 12807 UNITED RENTALS 42615627-001 TAKEUCHI MINI EXCAVATOR 301-8630-4201 2,202.66 Total : 2,202.66 38239 10/7/2004 10785 UNITED STORM WATER, INC. SW15959 STORM DRAIN & CATCH BASIN CLEANING 160-3102-4201 1,258.00 SW15961 STORM DRAIN & CATCH BASIN CLEANING 160-3102-4201 749.00 SW16218 STORM DRAIN & CATCH BASIN CLEANING 160-3102-4201 481.50 Total : 2,488.50 38240 10/7/2004 11035 US LANDSCAPES, INC., A DIVISION 0051 PALM TREE REMOVAUCOMM CRT/9/04 Page: 10 10 vchlist Check Register Page: 11 10/0712004 4:53:03PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38240 10/7/2004 11035 US LANDSCAPES, INC., A DIVISION (Continued) • 38241 10/7/2004 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 4242 001-6101-4201 2161 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 105-2601-4201 109-3301-4201 2212 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 001-6101-4201 310 167-1756 310 PLO -0347 310-372-6186 PLO- 0346 UHO-3618 10/7/2004 09056 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTIONS 59306813 38243 10/7/2004 00135 XEROX CORPORATION 005273205 424414453 9/1/2004 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 09790459003 424414456 9/1/2004 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 10210459003 Phone Charges/9/16-10/16/04 001-2101-4304 Phone Billing/9/19-10/19/04 001-2101-4304 Phone Charges - Sept 04 001-1101-4304 001-1202-4304 001-4201-4304 Circuit Billing/9/16-10/16/04 001-2101-4304 Phone Charges/T-1 Circuit/9/22-10/22/04 001-2101-4304 Internet Services/9/22-10/21/04 715-1206-4201 Copier Maint/9/04 001-2101-4201 Gas Billing/7-19 to 8-17-04 001-4204-4303 Gas Billing/7-19 to 8-17-04 001-4204-4303 Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : 1,500.00 2,500.00 900.00 400.00 5,300.00 263.28 41.57 6.34 22.07 4.57 41.57 396.97 776.37 893.00 893.00 229.21 229.21 131.70 131.70 44.05 Page: 11 11 vchlist 10/0712004 4:53:03PM Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 12 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 424414456 9/1/2004 00170 425815148 9/15/2004 00170 426510318 9/22/2004 00170 426510395 9/22/2004 00170 426510396 9/8/2004 00170 SOUTHERN SOUTHERN SOUTHERN SOUTHERN SOUTHERN boa 71 Vouchers for bank code : 71 Vouchers in this report CALIFORNIA GAS CO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO CALIFORNIA GAS CO (Continued) 11540469001 01100457009 . 14120446001 . 13910446007 Gas Billing/7-30 to 8-30-04 001-4204-4303 Gas Billing/8-5 to 9-3-04 001-4204-4303 Gas Billing/8-5 to 9-3-04 001-4204-4303 Gas Billing/8-5 to 9-3-04 001-4204-4303 Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : Bank total : Total vouchers : 44.05 59.86 59.86 45.43 45.43 13.63 13.63 13.63 13.63 139,451.27 139,451.27 Page: , 12 Ia vchlist Check Register Page: 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/14/2004 4:36:14PM Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38244 10/14/2004 12889 709 FIRST PLACE 1141-16257 1141-16258 3$245 10/14/2004 11437 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CO -O 175460 38246 10/14/2004 12066 AIT 38247 10/14/2004 12697 ALLEN, CHRISTOPHER IVAN 38248 10/14/2004 12837 AN D RAD E, CAROL 0249 10/14/2004 00407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY 38250 10/14/2004 11721 BARTLETT, DESIREE 5089 5090 4601-03939 4601-03938 28311 28368 28406 4601-03937 Work Guarantee Refund -Permit # 2889 001-2110 Work Guarantee Refund -Permit # 4035 001-2110 DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM 145-3404-4201 Ink Cartridges 715-1206-4305 Ink Cartridges 001-2101-4305 Co -Instructor Pymnt Class # 9222 001-4601-4221 Instructor Pymnt Class # 9373 001-4601-4221 Night Emergency Call 001-4204-4309 New lock for Storage Room in Gym 001-4601-4305 New Lock for Storage Closet 001-4601-4305 Instructor Pymnt Class # 8946 001-4601-4221 500.00 1,600.00 Total : 2,100.00 3,284.60 Total : 3,284.60 276.62 Total : Total : Total : 344.62 621.24 980.00 980.00 168.00 168.00 115.00 74.36 66.71 Total : 256.07 294.00 Total : 294.00 3 Page: 1 vchlist Check Register Page: 2 10/14/2004 4:36:14PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38251 10/14/2004 03190 BLUEPRINT SERVICE & SUPPLY C 112196 Map Copies 001-4202-4201 21.65 Total : 21.65 *52 10/14/2004 00163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 0387790 Prison Laundry - 09/04 001-2101-4306 78.02 0389635 Prison Laundry - 09/04 001-2101-4306 37.25 0391661 Prison Laundry - 09/04 001-2101-4306 53.39 Total : 168.66 38253 10/14/2004 05621 BURRELL, STEPHEN R. 895 Per Diem - 10/16 - 20/04 001-1201-4317 250.00 Total : 250.00 38254 10/14/2004 03372 CA EMS PERSONNEL FUND Lic # P05524 License Renewal - B. Grebbien 001-2201-4315 130.00 Total : 130.00 38255 10/14/2004 03372 CA EMS PERSONNEL FUND Lic # P05282 License Renewal - P. Hawkins 001-2201-4315 130.00 . Total : 130.00 38256 10/14/2004 12230 CALIFORNIA OVERNIGHT 4489097 Courier Services - 9/28/04 001-1202-4201 12.82 Total : 12.82 38257 10/14/2004 12896 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES 910375 12 Cans of Moly lube 715-4206-4309 128.48 Total : 128.48 38258 10/14/2004 04928 COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR THE 10/13/2004 Reimb. Liability Trust Acct - 09/04 705-1209-4324 11,163.00 Total : 11,163.00 38259 10/14/2004 07809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 55490893 Office Supplies 001-1208-4305 166.37 Page: 2 14 vchlist 10/14/2004 4:36:14PM Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 3 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38259 10/14/2004 07809 38260 10/14/2004 08855 .61 10/14/2004 00049 CORPORATE EXPRESS D & D SERVICES, INC. DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIO 38262 10/14/2004 00147 DEVELOPMENT, THE 38263 10/14/2004 11034 38264 10/14/2004 12791 38265 10/14/2004 05509 EKLUND'S BLAST OFF (Continued) 17544 Animal Shelter & Disposal - 09/04 110-3302-4201 4201-16255 148574 Strong Motion Mapping Fee 001-3204 Film Processing - 09/04 001-2101-4305 3813 Steam Cleaning - Aloha Days 109-3301-4319 ELEMENTS OF ELEGANCE INTER 523531 ESCALANTE, RICK •8266 10/14/2004 01962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 38267 10/14/2004 12891 GANS, LANNING 38268 10/14/2004 12817 GEORGE, ROBERT B. 4601-03946 7-653-40844 1202-46284 4601-03940 Total : 166.37 285.00 Total : 285.00 Total : Total : Total : ALUMINUMNINYL BLINDS/FIRE STATION 180-8610-4201 Instructor Pymnt Class # 8966 & 8977 001-4601-4221 Courier Services - 08/13/04 001-4601-4305 2003 Assessment Tax Rebate 105-3105 Instructor Pymnt Class # 9222 001-4601-4221, Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : 541.63 541.63 28.79 28.79 1,950.00 1,950.00 1,973.28 1,973.28 420.00 420.00 24.28 24.28 24.61 24.61 980.00 980.00 Page: 3 15 vchlist Check Register Page: 4 10/14/2004 4:36:14PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38269 10/14/2004 12787 GLS SPORTS 273081 .70 10/14/2004 12311 GREMAUD, MARIE BAPTISTE 4601-03936 38271 10/14/2004 06518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. 2263 38272 10/14/2004 09136 HERMOSA AUTOMOTIVE 020107 Cable for new scoreboard 715-4204-5602 290.75 Total : 290.75 Instructor Pymnt Class # 8996 & 9000 001-4601-4221 448.00 Total : 448.00 Plan Check Services - 09/04 001-4201-4201 Auto Repair - 2000 Chevrolet Impala 715-2101-4311 15,789.47 Total : 15,789.47 180.00 Total : 180.00 38273 10/14/2004 00065 HERMOSA BEACH CAR WASH, ZI Oct 01, 2004 Car Wash - Oct 04 715-4202-4311 14.90 715-2101-4311 346.70 001-1202-4305 9.90 715-3302-4311 5.95 715-4201-4311 15.85 Total : 393.30 410 38274 10/14/2004 12894 HERRERA, NAOMI 100006 HAF rental fees refund 001-2111 60.00 Total : 60.00 298.66 Total : 298.66 1,600.00 Total : 1,600.00 38275 10/14/2004 01399 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 0189-357614 Paint Purchase - 09/04 001-4204-4309 38276 10/14/2004 09895 JOHN MADISON CONSTRUCTION 1141-16256 Work Guarantee Refund -Permit # 5298 001-2110 38277 10/14/2004 06293 KINKO'S INC. 10160P002665 Courier Service - 9/23/04 001-2101-4305 48.17 Page: 4 I (0 vchlist Check Register Page: 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/14/2004 4:36:14PM Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38277 10/14/2004 06293 KINKO'S INC. 278 10/14/2004 11065 LAOLAGI, ROSE 38279 38280 38281 38282 • 38283 (Continued) 10160P002666 Courier Service - 9/23/04 001-4601-4305 9999-03934 10/14/2004 04186 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES/LA CO DIV 1201-16226 10/14/2004 00167 LEARNED LUMBER B921060 10/14/2004 07060 MARKS, AARON 10/14/2004 12897 MOORE - LIMON, LINDA 3302-16282 Instructor Pymnt-Summer 04 Classes 001-4601-4221 City Managers Meeting - 10/27/04 001-1201-4317 Lumber Purchase - 10/04 001-4204-4309 893 Per Diem - 10/18 - 22/04 001-2201-4317 10/14/2004 04142 OFFICE DEPOT 878016463000 878029424000 878148238000 Refund of Impound Fee 001-3841 110-3302-4201 Office Supplies 001-2101-4305 Office Supplies 001-2201-4305 Office Supplies 001-2201-4305 38284 10/14/2004 12795 OFFICE TEAM 11914234 Temporary Personnel - W/E 9/24/04 001-4601-4201 Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : 39.16 87.33 2,856.00 2,856.00 30.00 30.00 13.81 13.81 250.00 250.00 47.00 96.50 143.50 77.92 69.20 76.08 223.20 816.00 Page: 5 I1 vchlist Check Register Page: 6 10/14/2004 4:36:14PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38284 10/14/2004 12795 OFFICE TEAM (Continued) 11926985 Temporary Personnel - W/E 10/01/04 001-4601-4201 Total : .285 10/14/2004 00093 OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 11405a Auto Repairs Balance/Fire Chief 816.00 1,632.00 715-2201-4311 37.45 11434 Auto Repair -'01 Dodge Durango 715-2101-4311 • 269.87 Total : 307.32 38286 10/14/2004 06334 ORMONDROYD, HAROLD 1202-16283 2003 Assessment Tax Rebate 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 38287 10/14/2004 12893 POLIZZOTTO, DANIEL 99837 Cancelled Class Refund 001-2111 130.00 Total : 130.00 38288 10/14/2004 03910 PORTERS ALIGNMENT & BRAKE S 12888 Resurface Brake Drums 715-3302-4311 12.00 Total : 12.00 0289 10/14/2004 01429 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION 410752 Battery Clips 105-2601-4309 14.23 Total : 14.23 38290 10/14/2004 03282 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF 4101-16229 03-04 Wave Dial -A -Ride 4th. Qtr. 145-3401-4251 58,611.03 145-3854 -2,326.05 145-3121 -10,679.46 Total : 45,605.52 38291 10/14/2004 10837 S.C.A.C.E.O. 4201-16236 Registration - Robert Rollins 001-4201-4317 65.00 Total : 65.00 38292 10/14/2004 11751 SANTA ANA COLLEGE 2201-15261 Class Registration - Aaron Marks Page: 6 18 vchlist Check Register Page: 7 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/14/2004 4:36:14PM Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38292 10/14/2004 11751 SANTA ANA COLLEGE (Continued) 38293 10/14/2004 00839 SAXE-CLIFFORD PH D, SUSAN 4-1001-6 • 38294 10/14/2004 09353 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 460103935 38295 10/14/2004 00114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY *96 10/14/2004 12898 SOUR, DAVID 38297 10/14/2004 10532 SOUTH BAY FORD 001-2201-4317 Pre Employment Exam 001-1203-4320 Instructor Pymnt Class # 8835 001-4601-4221 83641 Cleaning Supplies for Fire Dept. 001-4204-4309 83642 Water for Strike Team Assignments 001-2201-4305 84800 Food for Prisoners - 09/04 001-2101-4306 85922 Camp Supplies 001-4601-4308 89655 Jail Supplies 001-2101-4306 4601-03941 48877 49881 49977 50016 Umpire Fees Feb - Apr 04 001-4601-4201 Auto Parts Purchase - 09/04 715-2101-4311 Auto Parts Purchase - 10/04 715-2101-4311 Auto Parts Purchase - 10/04 715-3302-4311 Auto Parts Purchase - 10/04 715-3302-4311 Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : 15.00 15.00 350.00 350.00 1,516.80 1,516.80 323.59 16.34 69.12 254.39 143.03 806.47 485.00 485.00 76.44 76.93 24.51 55.19 Page: 7 19 vchlist Check Register Page: 8 10/14/2004 4:36:14PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38297 10/14/2004 10532 SOUTH BAY FORD (Continued) ' 50072 Auto Parts Purchase - 10/04 715-2101-4311 151.97 50101 Auto Parts Purchase - 10/04 III 715-2101-4311 4.92 50210 Auto Parts Purchase - 10/04 715-2101-4311 37.70 CM49106 Returned Hose 715-2101-4311 -26.18 Total : 401.48 38298 10/14/2004 08812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC C 200405044 Strobe lights for Patrol Car 715-2101-4311 34.42 200405058 Lightbar Installed on unit HB -6 715-2101-5402 1,326.17 Total : 1,360.59 38299 10/14/2004 06060 SOUTH COAST AQMD 1625499 Spray Equipment 715-4206-4251 415.64 1626912 FY04-05 Emissions Fee 715-4206-4251 77.25 Total : 492.89 .300 10/14/2004 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C 2-00-989-691 Electric Billing - 9/07 - 10/06/04 105-2601-4303 195.84 2-00-989-731 Electric Billing - 9/01 - 10/04/04 105-2601-4303 9,751.85 2-01-836-745 Electric Billing - 9/07 - 10/06/04 105-2601-4303 11.60 2-02-274-054 Electric Billing - 9/07 - 10/06/04 001-6101-4303 14.50 2-08-629-366 Electric Billing - 9/02 - 10/04/04 001-4204-4303 115.46 2-09-076-585 Electric Billing - 9/07 - 10/06/04 105-2601-4303 18.56 Page: 8 ao vchlist Check Register Page: 9 10/1412004 4:36:14PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38300 10/14/2004 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C (Continued) • 2-10-947-982 Electric Billing - 9/07 - 10/06/04 105-2601-4303 2-19-024-160 Electric Billing - 9/07 - 10/07/04 001-6101-4303 2-20-128-482 Electric Billing - 9/07 - 10/06/04 109-3304-4303 2-20-128-547 Electric Billing - 9/02 - 10/04/04 001-4204-4303 2-20-984-617 Electric Billing - 9/07 - 10/06/04 105-2601-4303 2-20-984-636 Electric Billing - 9/02 -10/04/04 105-2601-4303 2-21-400-768 Electric Billing - 9/07 - 10/06/04 105-2601-4303 2-21-964-800 Electric Billing - 9/02 -10/05/04 105-2601-4303 2-22-267-066 Electric Billing - 9/07 - 10/06/04 109-3304-4303 2-23-687-802 Electric Billing - 09/01 - 10/04/04 001-3104-4303 .301 10/14/2004 12895 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, / 6044-8800 De -energize 47 Street Lights 105-2601-4303 Total : Total : 125.56 374.56 1,974.54 65.80 25.52 193.48 27.41 29.93 74.03 102.58 13,101.22 1,010.00 1,010.00 38302 10/14/2004 06511 SOUTHWEST SERVICE SOLUTIO 12331 & 1233 PRINTER REPAIRS/POLICE DEPARTMENT 001-2101-4309 191.00 Total : 191.00 38303 10/14/2004 00146 SPARKLETTS 9820211-61 Water Dispenser Rental - 09/04 001-2201-4305 3.75 Total : 3.75 38304 10/14/2004 00806 SUN BADGE COMPANY 253805 BADGES / ARSON INVESTIGATION 001-2201-4314 155.84 Page: 9 a1 vchlist Check Register Page: 10 10/14/2004 4:36:14PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38304 10/14/2004 00806 SUN BADGE COMPANY (Continued) Total : 155.84 38305 10/14/2004 11102 TORRANCE WHOLESALE NURSER 383473 Begonias for Planters 105-2601-4309 284.16 • 383477 Plants Purchase - 09/04 105-2601-4309 290.66 383478 Plants Purchase - 09/04 105-2601-4309 266.30 4202-16261 Plants Purchase - 09/04 105-2601-4309 259.80 Total : 1,100.92 38306 10/14/2004 03239 TURKOLU, RALPH 1202-16260 2003 Assessment Tax Rebate 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 38307 10/14/2004 11035 US LANDSCAPES, INC., A DIVISION 2056 Tree trimming and removal 001-2024 1,250.00 Total : 1,250.00 38308 10/14/2004 12892 WATANABE, DIANE 100100 Cancelled Class Refund 001-2111 60.00 • Total : 60.00 38309 10/14/2004 12806 WCIRB 11909 CHPD COMMAND CONSOLE 154-2107-5403 4,855.01 Total : 4,855.01 38310 10/14/2004 08767 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 807413714 California Codes 001-1121-4201 259.80 Total : 259.80 67 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 123,997.56 67 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 123,997.56 21 Page: 10 vchlist 10/18/2004 5:06:36PM Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 1 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38311 10/18/2004 12808 STEWART PRODUCTS INC. 0011909 CHPD Command Console 154-2107-5403 4,855.01 Total : 4,855.01 1 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 4,855.01 • 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 4,855.01 • a3 Page: 1 vchlist Check Register Page: 1 10/20/2004 7:25:55AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38312 10/20/2004 00243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACC 10152004 Payroll/10-1 to 10-15-04 001-1103 585,248.26 105-1103 7,569.70 • 109-1103 4,023.18 110-1103 51,338.47 117-1103 854.79 122-1103 1,256.22 145-1103 1,543.34 152-1103 53.15 156-1103 2,950.87 160-1103 8,290.16 170-1103 3,199.82 301-1103 723.09 705-1103 3,458.92 715-1103 9,243.56 Total : 679,753.53 1 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 679,753.53 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 679,753.53 • Page: 1 vchlist Check Register Page: 2 10/20/2004 7:25:55AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount "I hereby certify that the demands or claims vered by the checks listed on pages / to Ainclusive, of the check register for Ion — 20/0/4 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget? • By Finance Director Date Z/eC • Page: 2 October 20, 2004 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council October 28, 2004 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please ratify the following request for cancellation of the check listed below: #38309 — 10/14/04 — WCIRB — $4,855.01 The check was written to the wrong vendor. The check was not mailed. Concur; Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager Workman, City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director October 21, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of October 26, 2004 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS NOVEMBER 9, 2004 Recommendation to consider outsourcing of ambulance program and two engine staffing Fire Chief Report on WAVE/Transit Program City Manager Report on full WIFI deployment Citywide City Manager City assumption of responsibility for enforcement of the State Mobilehome Parks Act relating to Mobilehome Parks and RV Parks in the City Community Development Director Annual review of Fiestas City Manager Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of October 20, 2004. Public Works Director NOVEMBER 23, 2004 Engineers Report for proposed Bayview Underground Utility Assessment District City Manager Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of November 2, 2004. Community Resources Dept. Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of November 16, 2004. Community Development Director Activity Reports — October All Departments DECEMBER 14, 2004 Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of November 17, 2004. Public Works Director DECEMBER 28, 2004 NO MEETING 2c • • October 20, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 26, 2004 REVENUE, EXPENDITURE, CITY TREASURER'S AND INVESTMENT REPORTS SEPTEMBER 2004 The September 2004 Revenue, Expenditure, City Treasurer and Investment reports are not available at this time. Typically the reports are not available at this time due to preparation for our annual audit. Respectfully submitted, Viki Copeland Finance Director NOTED: Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager 2d F:\B95\FINANCE 1 \REV EXPnorepAudit. DOC • October 13, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 26, 2004 NOTICE OF CLOSED CLAIMS The City has resolved and closed the following claims: 1. Claimant McAndrews, Barbara Date of Loss .• 05-064 Date Filed .• 07-29-04 Damage Property damage Disposition Claim paid $5,141.00 2. Claimant Patterson, Gaspard Date of Loss .• 01-12-04 Date Filed .• 03-17-04 Damage Property damage Disposition .• .Claim paid $36,739.84 A copy of these claims are on file with the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, ur: chael A. Earl, Director Stephen R. Burrell Personnel & Risk Management City Manager 2e ACTION SHEET AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 October 19, 2004 7:00 P.M. Sam Perrotti Chairman Ron Pizer Peter Hoffman Kent Allen Richard Koenig 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call COMM.KOENIG ABSENT. 3. Oral / Written Communications Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. Section I Consent Calendar Any Planning Commissioner or public wishing to pull an item from below may request to do so at this time. 4. Approval of September 21, 2004 minutes ACTION: APPROVED (4-0). 5. Resolution(s) for adoption Section II Public Hearing(s) 6. CUP 04-2 -- Conditional Use Permit amendment to an R-1 Planned Development for four single family homes to modify the retaining wall and landscaping areas at the rear of the homes at 1911, 1921, 1931 and 1941 Power Street (continued from June 15, July 20, August 17 and September 21, 2004 meetings). 2f • • Staff Recommended Action: To require that the applicant provide a new public notice when plans and studies are completed. ACTION: CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 16, 2004 MEETING (4-0). 7. CON 04-17/PDP 04-18 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 061822 for a two -unit condominium at 85 15th Street (continued from August 17 and September 21, 2004 meetings). Staff Recommended Action: To continue to November 16, 2004 meeting. ACTION: CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 16, 2004 MEETING (4-0). 8. L-5/NR 04-2 -- Determination of the Legality of an existing garden room and continuation of a Nonconforming Remodel to allow the extension of an existing wall with a nonconforming side yard at 1085-1087 Monterey Boulevard (continued from June 15, July 20, August 17 and September 21, 2004 meetings). Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. ACTION: APPROVED (4-0). 9. CON 04-16/PDP 04-17 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 061452 for a three -unit condominium at 445 Manhattan Avenue (continued from August 17, 2004 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. ACTION: APPROVED (3-1; COMM. HOFFMAN NO). 10. L-5 -- Determination of whether there are four legal dwelling units at 1533 Manhattan Avenue and 1534 Palm Drive. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. ACTION: CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 16, 2004 MEETING (4-0). 11. CON 04-21/PDP 04-23 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 061755 for a two -unit condominium at 619 5th Street. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. ACTION: APPROVED WITH MODIFICATIONS (4-0). 12. CUP 04-5 -- Conditional Use Permit amendment to allow on -premises wine tasting in conjunction with an existing market with off -sale beer and wine at 302 Pier Avenue. Staff Recommended Action: To continue to November 16, 2004 meeting. ACTION: CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 16, 2004 MEETING (4-0). Section III 13. Staff Items a. Memorandum regarding request to interpret condition Nos. 3 and 4 of P.C. Resolution 04-14 at 30-44 Hermosa Avenue. b. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. 2 c. Community Development Department Activity Report of August, 2004. d. City Council minutes of September 14 and 28, 2004 ACTION: RECEIVED AND FILED -THE ABOVE 13A -D. 14. Commissioner Items 15. Adjournment 3 • • October 14, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council October 26, 2004 RECOMMENDATION TO DENY CLAIMS Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council deny the following claims and refer them to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: 1. Claimant: Southern California Edison Date of Loss: 09-09-04 Date Filed: 10-07-04 Allegation: Property damage 2. Claimant: Kim, John Y. Date of Loss: 04-21-04 Date Filed: 10-18-04 Allegation: Trip and fall 3. Claimant: Villa, Edilberto Date of Loss: 05-12-04 Date Filed: 10-18-04 Allegation: Personal injury A copy of these claims are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, Michael A. Earl, 'rector Personnel & Risk Manage ent Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 2g SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company CERTIFIED MAIL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 VALLEY DR HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Reference: Date of Occurrence: Location: Our File No: October 4, 2004 200406238 Hermosa Beach, City of September 09, 2004 1201 The Strand Hermosa Beach, CA 200406238 Maria E. Arredondo Claims Repre ..f `1 4 y/i �i r0:y X3 4 c ,u^ • t:.,7r \ Gentlemen: Enclosed is our Claim Against a Governmental Agency in the estimated amount of $5,000.00. When our actual costs are known, this claim will be amended. If additional forms are required for a claim of this nature, please forward copies, to my attention, in the enclosed return envelope. Please reference our file number, 200406238, on all correspondence. enclosure P.O. Box 900 Sincerely, Mariate. Arredondo 2244 Walnut Grove Ave. Rosemead, California 91770 (626) 302-1974 Fax (626) 569-2573 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company Our File No. 200406238 CLAIM AGAINST A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY The Southern California Edison Company, a corporation, is hereby presenting its claim for damage/loss to City of Hermosa Beach. 1. Date of occurrence/discovery 2. Location of occurrence 3. Cause of damage/loss September 09, 2004 1201 The Strand, Hermosa Beach, CA Underground Damage - Dig In - Unknown employees of the City of Hermosa Beach struck and damaged Edison's underground electrical facilities during excavating activities. 4. Amount or estimate of damage/loss $5,000.00 5. Name and address (if known) of public" N/A employee or agency causing damage All correspondence in regard to this claim should be addressed to: Southern California Edison Company (Claims Department), P.O. Box 900, Rosemead, California 91770, Attention: Maria E. Arredondo VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION State of California, County of Los Angeles (ss.) Maria E. Arredondo, being by me duly sworn, deposes and says: that he/she is a Claims Representative for Southern California Edison Company, a corporation, claimant; that he/she has read the foregoing claim and knows the contents thereof; and that the same is true and correct of his/her own knowledge, except as to the matters which are therein stated upon his/her information or belief, and as to those matters that he/she believes to be true. Claimant's Signature P.O. Box 900 2244 Walnut Grove Ave. Rosemead, California 91770 (626) 302-1974 Fax (626) 569-2573 • • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company STATEMENT October 4, 2004 200406238 City Of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dr Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Cost to repair and/or replace facilities damaged on September 09, 2004; located at 1201 The Strand Hermosa Beach, California. Estimated cost: $5,000.00 P.O. Box 900 2244 Walnut Grove Ave. Rosemead, California 91770 (626) 302-1974 Fax (626) 569-2573 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPERTY FILE WITH: City Clerk's Office City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 INSTRUCTIONS 1. Claims for death, injury to person or to personal property must be filed not later than six months after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 3. Read entire claim form before filing. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom. 6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. Name of Claimant John Y. Kim, Jr. Home Address Of Claimant Hermosa Beach, CA 236 Manhattan Ave., Apt.#2,90254 Business Address of Claimant P.O. Box 1288, Manhattan Beach;CA 90267-1288 Give address and telephone number to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim. • P.O. Box 1288, Manhattan Beach, CA 90267-1Z88 (310) 406-0363 Date of Damage/Loss/Injury 04/21/2004 Place of Damage/Loss/Injury Southern curbside of the 900 block 90254. tsetween ucean urive How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) See attached Were Police at scene? Were Paramedics at scene? RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP Date Of Birth Of Claimant 07/25/1967 Occupation of Claimant consultant/ actor Home Telephone Number (310) 406-0363 Business Telephone Number ( 310) 892-700n Claimants Social Security No. 361-62-5899 Time 9: 00 A M. P.M. f Montgomery Drive, Hermosa Beach and Aubrey Ct. Yes 0 Yes 0 No El No What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/injury. See attached Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: IReport No. The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this claim, is Damages incurred to date (exact): Expenses for medical $ 10 II00 _ 00+ and hospital carer Loss of earnings $ undetermined Special damages for $ undetermined $ 85,000.00 General damages Total damages incurred to date $ undetermined computed as follows: (please attach estimates/receipts) Estimated expenses for medical and hospital care Future expenses for medical and o Be Determine hospital care Future Toss of earnings STo Be Determine Other prospective special sTo Be Determine, damages Prospective general damages eTo Be Determine, Total estimate prospective 5To Be Determine damages WITNESSES to DAMAGE or INJURY: LIST ItlX PERSONS and addresses of persons known to have information: 213 41st Street Phone 310) 796-0199 Name -• 4rice. Bothell - tiauress Manhattan Beach, CA :10266 Name Scott Ehrlich Name Robert Seal Address8 21 3rd S t . Manhattan Beach, CA Address11711 Darlington #8, Los Angeles, Phone (310) 90266 rlin ton Ave. Phone (31 0) 571-3595 CA 90049 318-1949 DOCTORS and HOSPITALS: 6801 Park Terrace Ker n -Jobe Orthopaec i�gressLos Angeles, CA 9006Ae Hospitalized Hospital Phillip K. Kwong Doctor 5/13/2004 - Address -n Tube Date of Treatment present 5/19/2004— Date of Treatment pp4r//psent CA 90095 same as above Doctor Ralph A. GambardellaAddressKerlan-Jobe And4rea Cracchiolo III UCLA Medical Center nteeles, Dept. of Orthopaedic surgery, os READ CAREFULLY when you first saw City vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A-1" and location of yourself or your vehicle at the time of the accident by '13-1" and the point of impact by 'X'. NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant. 866904 For all accident claims place on following diagram names of streets, including North, East, South, and West indicate place of accident by 'X" and showing house number or distances to street comers. If .City vehicle was involved, designate by letter 'A" location of City vehicle when you e first saw it, and by '8" location of yourselfyour Signature of claimant or person filing on his behalf givinrelationshi to latnt: Typed Name: John Y. Kim, Jr. 4: 1/ v 4 a 0 0 Date: CURB 10/15/2004 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1018-1 • • GOOD, WEST & SCHUETZE 70 S. Lake Ave., Suite 600 Pasadena, CA 91101-2601 (626) 440-0000 NED GOOD STATE BAR 23129 10-13-04 7C:\=CASES=\Villa\PLEADINGS\GOVERNMENT CLAIM.wpd ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF AND CLAIMANT EDILBERTO VILLA Claim For Damages To: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA and NANCY COOK. This claim is made by the Plaintiff(s) Claimant(s) named herein, by their attorney-in- fact and at law for two million dollars or less if the injuries prove less severe. DATED: October 13, 2004 By: 1 10t7yWEST S SCHUETZE (1-11 NED GOOD Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1n1R-1 • • 10-13-04 7C:\=CASES=\Villa\PLEADINGS\GOVERNMENT CLAIM.wpd 1 Claimant occasionally referred to as Plaintiff is named hereafter: EDILBEROTO VILLA 2. Claimant(s) make this claim against each of the above-named parties (hereafter referred to as defendant(s)), arising out of this incident. 3. This claim is for: A. X PERSONAL injuries - pain and suffering, etc. X medical expenses X lost earnings and lost earning capacity X property damage, depreciation, and lost use X lost services X prejudgment interest B. X All other damages permitted by the law 4. The name and post office address of the claimants(s): EDILBEROTO VILLA CAN BE REACHED THRU THEIR ATTORNEYS: GOOD, WEST & SCHUETZE 70 South Lake Avenue, Suite 600 Pasadena, CA 91101 Phone (626) 440-0000 - Fax (626) 449-0214 5. Post office address to which person(s) presenting the claim desires all notices and communication to be sent: GOOD, WEST & SCHUETZE 70 South Lake Avenue, Suite 600 Pasadena, CA 91101 Phone (626) 440-0000 - Fax (626) 449-0214 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1n1R-1 • • 10-13-04 7C:\=CASES=\Villa\PLEADINGS\GOVERNMENT CLAIM.wpd 6. Date of Accident: MAY 12, 2004 7. Place of accident: At the Southwest corner of the intersection of N. Catalina Avenue and Gertruda Avenue. in Redondo Beach, California. 8. Circumstances of injury according to information and belief: On May 12, 2004 Edilberoto Villa was riding his bicycle northbound on N. Catalina Ave. on the west side of the Avenue and was hit by Nancy Cook while crossing Gertruda Ave. in the crosswalk. Ms. Cook was driving her Ford Mustang traveling east on Gertruda Ave. and failed to maintain a proper lookout and failed to keep her car under proper control hit Mr. Villa causing his injuries. Ms. Cook was driving her car within the course and scope of her employment as a Hermosa Beach Police Sergeant. 9. The damages claimed are a result of: A. The negligent, wanton, reckless, and unlawful operation of the vehicle Ms. Cook was operating and her failure to maintain a proper lookout and failure to keep her vehicle under proper control and failure to properly maintain her vehicle causing her to strike and injure plaintiff. 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1018-1 • • 10-13-04 7C:\=CASES=\Villa\PLEADINGS\GOVERNMENT CLAIM.wpd 10. The general description of the damages incurred so far as now known are: X A. Permanent bodily injuries and past, present and future PAIN, suffering, worry and anxiety. X B. Past, present and future MEDICAL and related expenses. X C. Past, present and future lost ability to do plaintiffs usual work and lost EARNING capacity. X D. PROPERTY damaged and/or depreciated in value and lost usage. X E. Lost use of and INTEREST on money owed to plaintiff as permitted by law: (1) On the general damages; (2) On the medical expenses incurred to judgement; (3) On the loss of earnings to judgement; (4) On the property damaged, destroyed and/or depreciated and lost usage. 4 • September 20, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of October 26, 2004 the Hermosa Beach City Council PROJECT STATUS REPORT Recommendation: It is recommended that Council receive and file this report. Summary: As of September 30, 2004 This report gives the status of capital improvement projects that are either under design or construction. Capital improvement projects not indicated in this report can be found in the department's Monthly Activity Report. Project Status: PROJECT NO. CIP 02-106 BEACH DRIVE POST-UNDERGROUNDING STREET IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS TBD PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 10/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 1/05 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 2/05 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 3/05 BID OPENING 4/05 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 05/05 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 6/05 END CONSTRUCTION 8/05 PROJECT NO. CIP 02-108 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 2MD ST. FROM PCH TO THE STRAND; MONTEREY FROM HERONDO TO 4T" ST. DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS TBD PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 05/07/03 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 08/10/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 10/04 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 10/04 BID OPENING 11/04 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 12/04 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 01/05 END CONSTRUCTION 03/05 PROJECT NO. CIP 04-112 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - SLURRY SEAL AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS DESCRIPTION STATUS TBD PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE BID OPENING TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. CIP 04-113 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - CONCRETE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS DESCRIPTION STATUS TBD PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE BID OPENING TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION 2h PROJECT NO. CIP 04-114 STREET IMPROVEMENTS- SPEED HUMPS ON 24" PLACE DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 11/04 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 7-12-04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 8-16-04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE NIA TBD BID OPENING COMPLETED 09/02/04 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 09/14/04 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION BEGUN 10/13/04 END CONSTRUCTION 10/04 PROJECT NO. CIP 04-115 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 20" ST. FROM VALLEY DR. TO POWER ST. DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 11/04 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 8-16-04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TBD TBD TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD TBD BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 04-116 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PIER AVE.. HERMOSA AVE. TO PCH DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 11/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 01/05 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 03/05 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 04-117 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - MANHATTAN AVE. 1ST ST. TO CITY LIMITS DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 10/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TBD TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 00-140 11T" PLACE ON -STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS REVISED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 12/22/02 UNDERGROUNDING DESIGN BY SCE COMPLETED 02/24/04 PLANS SPECS & ESTIMATES COMPLETED 06-15-04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW COMPLETED 10/22/03 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE (UNDERGROUNDING) ON HOLD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE (STREET IMPROVEMENTS) BID OPENING TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION 2 PROJECT NO. CIP 99409* MANHOLE REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS ON HOLD 9/14/04 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REVISED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING N/A 07-15-03 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) N/A TBD TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE N/A TBD BID OPENING COMPLETED 06/12/03 WILL BE REBID TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 00-412 SEWER REHAB/RECON TARGET AREA 2 DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS ON HOLD 9/14/04 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 09/04 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 07-15-03 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TBD TBD TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 03-418 UPGRADE OF SEWER PUMP STATIONS DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS ON HOLD 9/14/04 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 09/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 10/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 04-534 PARK IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 10/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 12/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD . TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 02-612 PUBLIC WORKS YARD RENOVATION DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING BEGUN 7/01/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TED TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD 3 PROJECT NO. CIP 02-626 COMMUNITY CENTER THEATER ADA UPGRADES PHASES 3 & 4 DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 10/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 12/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF DESIGN & SPECS 01/05 BID OPENING 02/05 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 02/05 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 03/05 END CONSTRUCTION 06/05 PROJECT NO. CIP 00-630 PIER RENOVATION. PHASE III DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REVISED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03/08/00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 08/29/03 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE - COMPLETED 05/27/03 BID OPENING COMPLETED 07/01/04 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 07/27/04 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 09/13/04 END CONSTRUCTION 08/05 PROJECT NO. CIP 02-634 CITY BUILDINGS - EXTERIOR PAINTING DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING TBD DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE BID OPENING TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION • Indicates Construction Completed *TBD — TO BE DETERMINED Respecubmitted, Richar• organ, P.E. Dire - of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Stephen R. Bi\I,fybII City Manager 4 H:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\progress reports september 04-05.doc • HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL • October 19, 2004 Regular Meeting of October 26, 2004 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP NO. 26814 (C.U.P. CON NO. 02-15, PDP NO. 02-19) LOCATION: 538 AND 540 MANHATTAN AVENUE APPLICANT(S): ROBERT S. CORRY REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map No. 26814 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a two unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No.26814 at their March 18, 2003 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. 2i Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Sol Bl menfel., Dir. tor Community D elopment Department Stephen R. City Manag lly sub 'tted Senior Planner y/f:fm538 and 540man 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 26814 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 538 AND 540 MANHATTAN AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on October 26, 2004 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 02-54 adopted after hearing on March 18, 2003; E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map No.26814 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 16, Tract No. 1074, as recorded in Book 17, Page(s) 137 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 538 and 540 Manhattan Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 26th day of October, 2004. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK 3 CITY ATTORNEY f fm538manrs MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HELD ON MARCH 18, 2003, 7:00 P.M., AT THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS The m- • was called to order by Chairman Pizer at 7:00 P.M. Commissioner Tuc - - d the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Hoffman, Ke : s _ • om, Perrotti, Tucker, and Chairman Pizer Absent: None Also Present: Sol Blumenfeld, C • • unity Developmen : ' ector Denise Both ecording Secretary ORAL/WRITT OMMUNICATIONS Non CONS ALENDAR MOTION by Commission rrotti, seconded by Vice -Ch. . Hoffman, to APPROVE the January 27, 2003 and February 18, 2 mutes as s - ed. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboo s ' rrotti, Pizer, NOES: None ABSTAIN: No ABSENT. one Director Blumenfeld advised that the project architect has completed the plans for the project, but that there will be some slight modifications to the critical points for measuring height; and that the project as submitted reflects the revisions as previously suggested by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Perrotti requested input with regard to the plans reflecting decorative pavement but noted the absence of this provision in the resolution and suggested this be a standard condition. Director Blumenfeld explained that projects must be constructed as shown on the approved plans or as stipulated by the conditions of approval; and stated that this project does include decorative concrete paving on the approved plans as approved by Commission. MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to APPROVE Resolution P.C. 02-54, approving a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #26814 for a two -unit condominium project at 538-540 Manhattan Avenue and moved to include a provision in the resolution for decorative concrete paving. This motion carried as follows: Planning Commission Minutes ; March 18, 2003 AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker None None None UBLIC HEARINGS 6. PDP 02-8/PARK 02-6 -- Precise Development Plan and Variance for a 4,500- ot expansion of an existing office building by the addition of a third Pa ing Plan to permit five tandem parking spaces, and adoption of an En Neg• 've Declaration at 824 1st Street, and adoption of an Environm Declar. ion (continued from September 17, October 15, Novemb January • , 2003 meetings). Staff Recommended ction: To receive and file. Director Blumenfeld point Planning Commission; expla redesigned; and stated that the a consistent with the Zoning Ordin been agendized over three times, renotice for another public hearing on code complying. Staff is recommending this report. out that the proposed project has been ed that during this period of time, t licant is continuing to work on ce and not require discreti irector Blumenfeld n but that no hea this time th quare- oor, and ronmental tal Negative 19, 2002 and ontinued three times at the project has evolved and been e project to ensure that it will be ary review. Since this proposal has ed that the applicant is required to g will be required if the project is fully the Planning Commission receive and file Chairman Pizer opened the public hearing. The : being no public input, Chairman Pizer closed the public hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Perrotti, conded by AND FILE PDP 02-8/PARK 02-6 -- 'recise Developme foot expansion of an existing office • uilding by the additio permit five tandem parking space , and adoption of an Enviro 1st Street, and adoption of an E • ironmental Negative Declaration. issioner Kersenboom, to RECEIVE Plan and Variance for a 4,500 -square - of a third floor, and Parking Plan to ental Negative Declaration at 824 The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Hoffman, senboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker None None Non 7. VAR 0 . -3 — Variance from the minimum lot area per dwelling unit stat lard in the R- 3 zo ' to allow the development of two units on a 2,611 -square -foot lot a • 220 Sunset D' e. Staff ' ecommended Action: To deny said request. erector Blumenfeld stated that this property is a street -to -alley through lot; that it has frontage o Planning Commission Minutes March 18, 2003 • • HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL October 19, 2004 Regular Meeting of October 26, 2004 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP NO. 26936 (C.U.P. CON NO. 03-1, PDP NO. 03-1) LOCATION: 1449 MONTEREY BOULEVARD APPLICANT(S): NICK SCHAAR REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map No. 26936 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a two unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No.26936 at their January 21, 2003 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. 2j Analysis, The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Sol Blumenfel Director Community D: elopment Department Stephen R. City Manag Respectfu submitted, en'.'son Senior Planner y/f:fm1449mont 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 26936 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1449 MONTEREY BOULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on October 26, 2004 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 03-5 adopted after hearing on January 21, 2003; E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map No.26936 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 30 and Northwest 10 feet of Lot 35, Tract No. 1069, as recorded in Book 17, Page(s) 136 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1449 Monterey Boulevard, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 26th day of October, 2004. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY f:fm1449montrs C ' . irman Pizer closed the public hearing. The Plannin: ommission expressed its pleasure with the proposal for a decre.. in density and noted support of codings to support the request for a variance. MOTION by Vice-Chai : s Hoffman, seconded by APPROVE VAR 02-4 -- Variance •m the minimum for a two -lot subdivision resulting in ingl 2,503 square feet at 836 Beach Drive; and in conjunction with the approval of . parcel map approve carried as follows: ommissioner Kersenboom, to size requirements of 4,000 square feet mily lots measuring 2,850 square feet and d staff to return with a resolution for approval a two -lot subdivision. The motion to AYES: NOES: ABST NT: Hof one None None , Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker 11. CON 03-1/PDP 03-1 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 26936 for a two -unit condominium at 1449 Monterey Boulevard. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Director Blumenfeld stated that proposed project consists of two attached condominium units, with basements below two stories; advised that each unit has 4 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms; stated that the units are contemporarily styled; that the required parking is provided in ground floor garages, each with access directly from Monterey Boulevard and Bayview Drive; advised that the standard parking spaces provided in the garages will have to be adjusted to meet the 20 - foot standard; and stated that the curb cut on Monterey Boulevard causes the loss of one on -street parking space, but that it is accounted for with the extra guest parking space that's provided on site. He added that the rear guest space will have to be adjusted to meet the standard for the minimum turning radius requirement and that the parking setback requirements will have to be adjusted to meet the 3 -foot requirement. Due to the steep decline at the break point, Director Blumenfeld expressed staff's'belief that this site has a convex slope; advised that even with the convex slope finding, the project is still slightly over height, but that staff believes this excess height can be adjusted in the project design process. He added that the lot coverage is below 65 percent and that the minimum open space requirement has been met. Chairman Pizer opened the public hearing. Elizabeth Srour, 1001 6th Street, Manhattan Beach, representing the owner/developer, advised that the rear unit and garage parking deficiency has been corrected; stated that there is plenty of room within the unit to absorb the space that's required for the extra foot needed for the garage parking; with regard to the lot configurations, she explained that there is a steep 7- to 8 -foot drop-off at the rear of this property; and that it is her belief there is sufficient evidence to support the finding of a convex lot. She noted that the building will comply with code. 14 Planning Commission Minutes January 21, 2003 Chairman Pizer closed the public hearing. The Planning Commission expressed its support for this proposal as long as the deficiencies are adjusted to meet the requirements; and noted their concurrence that the lot has a convex slope. Director Blumenfeld recommended adding a Finding No. 3 in Section 3, that the project is to be developed on a slope determined to be convex. MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to APPROVE CON 03-1/PDP 03-1 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 26936 for a two -unit condominium at 1449 Monterey Boulevard; and to add Finding No. 3, Section 3, that the project is to be developed on a slope which has been deterimed to be convex. The motion to approve carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker None None None Due to a possible conflict of interest, Vice -Chairman Hoffman excused himself from consideration of Agenda Item No. 12. CON 03-2/PDP 03-2 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan a esting Tentative Parcel Map No. 26971 for a two -unit condominium 36 M s . erey Boulevard. Staff Recommende a • ction: To approve said request. Director Blumenfeld advise of two 3 -level structures, with are approximately 2,100 square feet; home; noted that the project is contempor ground floor garages, each accessed by Mon entries are located on the streets and alleys. Boulevard will lose one guest parking space, parking space provided on site. Director Bl each unit in front of the garages and that Boulevard; and advised that the rear required for a parallel space. He however, he advised that staff elevations shown on the s out that the survey in condition, which is lot coverage an at the project is located in the R-3 zone; floors above the basement; stat t the applicant will be re styled; that th ey Bo He b wi at the proposal consists that the project unit sizes ing an existing single-family equired parking is provided in the and and Sunset Drive; and that the ed that the guest parking on Monterey e accounted for with the extra guest t the guest parking is provided for e alley and two on Monterey d to meet the minimum 30 -foot height limit, roperty corner He pointed f wall nfeld noted e space is located on est space will have to be ted that the building complies with t requesting the building submittal contain all ey and that the roof plan also contain this informatio ates the westerly corner point elevations are taken as the to ote unreasonable. He stated that the project complies with the open andscape requirements. Chairman Pizer opened the public hearing. 15 s e, Planning Commission Minutes January 21, 2003 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL October 19, 2004 Regular Meeting of October 26, 2004 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP NO. 27099 (C.U.P. CON NO. 03-13, PDP NO. 03-16) LOCATION: 1016 AND 1018 17TH STREET APPLICANT(S): VALLEY DUNES, INC. REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map No. 27099 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a two unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No.27099 at their November 18, 2003 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. 2k Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: So : lumenfeld, I irect r Community Dev opment Department 1, 61, Stephen ' urrell City Manager Z Respectfull submit ed, Senior Planner y/f:f n1016 -17th ti 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 27099 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1016 AND 1018 17TH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on October 26, 2004 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 03-64 adopted after hearing on November 18, 2003; E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map No.27099 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 14, J.M. Floores Subdivision, as recorded in Book 9, Page(s) 127 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1016 and 1018 17th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 26th day, of October, 2004. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK 3 CITY ATTORNEY f:frnl0l6-17thrs wit be providing a full 2 -car garage and 2 guest spots in front and that he will be retaining t par ng space on the street. Mr. Febbo stated that decreasing the back units to one unit woul . . e cost p hibitive for him; and explained that he is really only. adding 1 room and 2 bathroo ' . He explaine that that the existing small bedroom will be used for the stairway of the seco • story, a hallway, an for some closet space. There being no her input, Chairman Hoffman closed the public hearing. Commissioner Pizer s . ed that even with the limited size of his home an• e aspect of adding 3 more parking spaces, he 's not able to make the Finding Nos. 1 an 2. He pointed out the possibility of being able to instruct a 2 -unit condo and noted that t' -re are other 29 -foot lots in the City. He expressed his be - f that this request is more of a pr erence for livability than it is for property rights. Commissioner Perrotti stated that he c • ld not make F' s mg No. being that there are other 29 - foot lots in that area and throughout the ; and po' out that the lot just north of this one is a 29 -foot frontage that was developed in con , rman - with the City's regulations. Vice -Chairman Tucker stated that he concurs it the Commission's comments and stated that he could not make Finding Nos. 1 or 2. Chairman Hoffman reiterated his i. erest in preservin historic homes in this City; and mentioned that this City just receiv . a C- from the Los Aneles Conservancy in terms of this City's efforts with historic prese. ation. That issue aside, Chai an Hoffman concurred with the Commission's statements and : ated that he could not make Findin os. 1 or 2 in this case. MOTION by Commiss', er Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Pizer, • DENY VAR 03-6 — a variance to allow a p eater than 250 -square -foot addition on a property ntaining three units with less than two arking spaces per unit at 1427 Monterey Boulevard. Th- otion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABS 'AIN: ENT: Hoffman, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker None None Kersenboom 7. CON 03-13/PDP 03-16 — Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 27099 for a two -unit condominium at 1016-1018 17th Street. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Associate Planner Lunceford advised that the subject site is located on the south side of 17th Street, between Raymond and Prospect Avenues; that the project consists of 2 detached units containing basements with 2 stories above; stated that each unit has 3 bedrooms and 3.5 bathrooms; and that the buildings are designed in a modem style, with smooth stucco and wood - siding finishes, painted redwood fascia, raised wood window trim and stucco and wood deck 4 Planning Commission Minutes November 18, 2003 guardrails. He stated that the building is designed to comply with the 30 -foot height limit — noting that the roof plan needs to be revised to show the proper locations of the maximum height critical points. He stated that the lot coverage calculates to be 61.2 percent, which is under the City's 65 percent allowable; that all required yards are provided; that the project includes a 10 - foot front yard setback to be consistent with the prevailing setback for the block. He stated that the required parking is provided in ground floor garages for each unit with access to a common driveway; advised that the curb cut on 17th Street will not cause the loss of any on -street parking; and that guest parking will be provided for both units at the rear end of the common driveway. Associate Planner Lunceford pointed out that there is a discrepancy between the site plan and the east elevation drawing for the finished grade elevation at the bottom of the main driveway slope by approximately a half foot; and stated that staff believes this issue can be resolved as a condition of approval. He stated that the- project complies with the open space requirements, except that the rear unit does not have enough usable open space to comply with the minimum requirement of 300 square feet; that the front unit has open space provided on second story decks with enough square footage provided to meet the minimum requirement of 300 square feet; that each unit has adequately sized decks adjacent to the primary living areas, over 100 square feet each; and advised that the rear unit has open space provided on one second story deck and in an excess side yard area, which adds up to 270 square feet. He noted that there is a 56 -square -foot entry patio for the rear unit that could be counted as usable open space if the eave above it is reduced by 6 inches, thereby reducing the coverage to 50 percent over that space; and stated that this issue could also be resolved as a condition of approval. Associate Planner Lunceford stated that this project generally meets all the requirements of the Condominium Ordinance; noted that storage areas are shown in both units to comply with the requirement of providing 200 cubic feet of storage space per unit; that the plans provide for landscaping in the areas available in the front, rear and side yards, but that the plans do not show any of the proposed trees as being mature size 36 -inch box trees. Chairman Hoffman opened the public hearing. Elizabeth Srour, representing the applicants, stated that the 3 minor issues can all be resolved during the plan check phase; stated that the driveway slope will also be worked out during plan check phase as well as the eave over the entry area. She stated that this is an attractive, clean project and noted that the units are self-contained and have with good separation. Commissioner Pizer highlighted the letter (of record) from neighbor Virginia Cooke in regard to this proposed project concerning the garage layout. In response, Ms. Srour stated that the proposed driveway width does meet the requirements of the City. Commissioner Perrotti commented on Virginia Cooke's letter and her concerns with losing her privacy as a result of the decks looking down onto her property; and suggested that additional landscaping be added for screening purposes. Ms. Srour stated that they would be willing to work with staff to provide this landscaping for screening purposes, but asked that the views not be impacted. 5 Planning Commission Minutes November 18, 2003 Addressing Ms. Cooke's letter, Vice -Chairman Tucker suggested that the balcony be moved back somewhat. Chairman Hoffman pointed out that moving the balcony back will impact the open space. Ms. Srour explained that the shortage pointed out by staff can be resolved with the design of the eave over the entry area. Associate Planner Lunceford explained that if the eave over the entry patio on the rear unit can be reduced, it would resolve this issue. There being no further input, Chairman Hoffman closed the public hearing. Vice -Chairman Tucker stated that he would prefer to see more design on the elevation; and stated that the adjustment with the deck/eave and the additional landscaping should alleviate the neighbor's concern with privacy. Commissioner Perrotti asked that the applicant work with staff to screen the neighbor's property. MOTION by Vice -Chairman Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Pizer, to APPROVE CON 03-13/PDP 03-16 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 27099 for a two -unit condominium at 1016-1018 17th Street; moved that the rear balcony on the rear unit be reduced by 2 feet; that the porch eave be reduced by 6 inches to comply with the open space requirement; and that landscaping be installed along the southerly property line for screening purposes for the neighbor. The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Hoffman, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker None None Kersenboom ON 03-14/PDP 03-17 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development and Ves 1. Tentative Parcel Map No. 60519 for a four -unit condomin' at 714-722 10th Stree Staff Recommended Action: rove said request. Senior Planner Robertson stated that this proj -11,41 wolves 2 existing lots on the south side of 10th Street, just west of the Pacific Coast H.: - ay Co s cial Corridor; stated that the easterly lot, 726 10th Street, was recently ch. : • from a General Plan : - ignation of Commercial Corridor and a zoning designation • -3 to its current designation of M,1 1, ensity Residential and R- 2; advised that s riginal property owner sold the property after - iving City Council approval fo e zone change; and noted that the new owner is proposin: units on the asse I : i lots. He noted that an existing barrier is located on the front of the pro . - its that sults in making 10th Street a dead-end street, with access to the residential lots available t • 6 Planning Commission Minutes November 18, 2003 • • October 18, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 26,-2004 PROJECT NO. CIP 02-108 STREET IMPROVEMENTS — 2ND STREET BETWEEN PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND MONTEREY BOULEVARD BETWEEN HERONDO STREET AND 4111 STREET — APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES; ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve the plans, specifications, and estimate; 2. Authorize Staff to proceed and to advertise for bids; and 2. Authorize the City Clerk to post Notice Inviting Sealed Bids for said project. Summary: Project No. CIP 02-108 Street Improvements — 2nd Street between Pacific Coast Highway and Monterey Boulevard between Herondo Street and 4th Street is approved for Fiscal Year 2004-05. Staff requests that City Council approve the plans, specifications and advertising for bids. The plans, specifications and estimate for this project have been approved by the Director of Public Works and are available in the Department of Public Works for review. Background: On August 13, 2002, City Council approved the Professional Services Agreement between the City and Advanced Applied Engineering, Inc. (AAE) for providing city traffic engineering and transportation planning services and authorized staff to negotiate and procure additional services by individual Task Order. On January 09, 2003 Staff issued a Contract Task Order to AAE to provide surveying and civil engineering services for pavement rehabilitation, construction of curb and gutter, sidewalk, and drainage corrections for 2nd Street between Pacific Coast Highway and The Strand. The scope of work includes pavement rehabilitation and construction of handicap access ramps, curbs & gutters, driveways, cross -gutters, and replacement of sidewalk panels. Pavement rehabilitation will consist of a combination of strategies, which will include crack and slurry sealing, milling and asphalt overlay, concrete and/or asphalt pavement spot repairs as well as the re -construction of the gutter section along both sides of Monterey Boulevard, re -construction of the intersections at 2nd Street and Monterey Blvd, 2nd Street and Manhattan Avenue, 2nd Street at Pacific Coast Highway, and 2nd Street between The Strand and Beach Drive. Work will also include the replacement of some of the existing curbs in 2nd Street and Monterey Boulevard with monolithic curb and gutters that will address drainage deficiencies and help prolong the life of the new pavement overlay. The re -construction of driveways will be included in those areas 21 • • where the curb and gutter is being replaced. The re -construction of the gutter sections on Monterey Boulevard will consist of the excavation and removal of the existing curb and non - monolithic 7.5' wide concrete gutter that were constructed circa 1923 and replacing it with new monolithic curb and gutter. Public Notices were mailed out and a public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Public Works Commission on October 20, 2004 to review the proposed project design. The engineer's estimate is approximately $347,055 and the duration of construction should be 45 working days. Fiscal Impact: No fiscal impact at this time. Attachment: Project Vicinity Map Respectfully submitted, Frank J. Senteno Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: Richard D. gan, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Stephen ' rre City Man=ger F:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\02-108 approval to advertise 10-26-04.doc 2 t wok 101, OS 011 2\ 1► z. COAST 1- PAC�F�G av 000° L' • ;-- HERMOSA AVEC cr) a WO I «0•10 11 ISO is Its 11 001111 01111111 000 031. 1i 1 it LEGEND goo sty eV tow z z. U) woo 300 150 0 0 CIP NO. 02-108 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS VICINITY MAP STREET IMPROVEMENT LIMITS 300 Feet CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 10-12-04 ATTACHMENT • • October 18, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 26, 2004 APPROVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (MTA) AND THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO ESTABLISH A CAPITAL RESERVE FUND FOR THE PIER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the MTA and the City of Hermosa Beach for establishing a capital reserve account for the allocation of Proposition C Local Return Program Funding towards the Pier Avenue Street Improvement Project (CIP No. 04-116); and 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney. Summary: Pier Avenue is a major destination point for hundreds of thousands of visitors annually coming to Hermosa Beach, leading to the Pier Plaza and the public beach areas. The City began preliminary planning to improve this street when they prepared their Downtown Implementation Plan in 1994. The proposed project would re -construct the street, curb and gutter and sidewalks along Pier Avenue from Pacific Coast Highway to Hermosa Avenue. The City received a fund allocation of $217,781 in Proposition C Local Return funds for Fiscal Year 2003-04, bringing our Prop C fund balance to $963,277. Under the Proposition C Ordinances, Local Return funds have three years from the last day of each fiscal year in which the funds were originally allocated to expend these funds. To insure not losing $263,271 in Prop C funds last July 1, 2004, the City requested that the MTA grant approval to establish a Capital Reserve Account to accumulate funds for the improvement of Pier Avenue. The City was notified (by attached letter dated September 29, 2004) that the project qualified for Prop C funding and establishment of a Capital Reserve account was approved. Execution of the attached MOU is the final step in setting up this account. The Public Works Department will begin preliminary design this fiscal year. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact at this time. Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding 2m Respectfully submitted, Fran J. Senteno Assistant Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Cop" and Finance Director • Concur: Richard i. Morgan, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Stephen R ur City Mana er 2 Ott F:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\approve MOA MTA 10-26-04.doc Me rQpolitan IransporTaS►on womanly • Metro September 29, 2004 Mr. Richard Morgan Public Works Director City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 une Laccway nazi Los Angeles, CA 9oo2-2952 • tiy.yzz.zuuu lei rnerra.net RECEIVED OCT 1 4 2004 PUBLIC WORKS Subject: Proposition A and Proposition C Local Return Capital Reserves Dear Mr. Morgan, Enclosed is a copy of the MTA Board item that was approved by the Board on August 18, 2004. The Guidelines state that MTA Board approval is needed for jurisdictions to set up Proposition A and Proposition C Local Return capital reserves to accumulate funds for larger projects. The next step of this process is to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between our agencies for the project, as approved by the Board. Enclosed are two original MOUs. Please obtain signatures from your City Manager or designee, and your legal department (if applicable). Then return both originals to me and .1 will obtain Mr. Snoble's signature and return one of the originals to you for your files. Note that the MOU is set up for a three-year period. The capital reserves are approved until September 2, 2007. Should you need additional time, please contact the MTA for an extension, or your funds may be in jeopardy and be subject to lapse. if you have any questions, you may reach me by phone at (213) 922-3017 or email at richans@metro.net. Sincerely, Susan Richan Program Manager _10-14-04 10:26 From -110,A, STRATEGIC PLANNING • 2139223013 • T-168 P.05/06 F-631 CAPITAL RESERVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ESTABLISHING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL RESERVE FUND This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is dazed as of September 1, 2004 and is by and between the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority CMTA") and the City of Hermosa Beach (the "City"). WHEREAS, the City is prepared to commit and accumulate Proposition C Local Return-, funds, to be used exclusively for the Hermosa Beach Pier Avenue Street Improvements project, as agreed to by both parties. NOW THEREFORE, the MTA and the City agree as follows: FUNDING The City shall establish a capital reserve fund and will allocate $1,992,000 of Proposition C Local Return funds (the "Funds") for the Hermosa Beach Pier Avenue Street Improvements (the "Project") as more fully described in the &ttached Project Description Form (Form A) (the "Project"). All interest accumulated on the Funds placed in the capital reserve shall accrue to that fund and used solely for the Project. TERM/LAPSE OF FUNDS The capital reserve fund will begin as of September 1, 2004. If the Funds are not expended by September 2, 2007, then any unexpended Funds will automatically lapse unless prior to the lapsing date, the MTA has approved to extend the term of the reserve. Before the end of the three (3) years, the MTA may evaluate the Capital Reserve Account as it pertains to the status of the Project and the projected amount of funds available. If the Project is delayed, the City must request in writing for MTA approval to extend the term of the reserve account before the lapsing date. Without such approval, the unexpended Funds will automatically lapse. This MOU incorporates by reference the conditions set forth in the Proposition A and Proposition C Local Return Guidelines pertaining to the Capital Reserve process (collectively the "Guidelines"). TERMINATION If either party desire to terminate this MOU early and reprogram the Funds in the capital reserve account, either party may give 30 -days written notice of such intent subject to the conditions set forth in the Guidelines. If the MTA terminates this MOU, in addition to the requirements in the Guidelines, the Funds must be expended within three years from the time the MTA decision is made. If the.City terminates this MOU or uses the Funds for a purpose different from the Project, in addition to the requirements in 10-14-04 10:26 From-M,T,A, STRATEGIC PLANNING S 2139223013 T-168 P.06/06 F-631 the Guidelines, the Funds must be returned to the City's Local Return account and will retain the original automatic lapsing date. CONDITIONS The MTA and the City agree to abide by the requirements of the Guidelines, which are incorporated herein by reference, including without limitation: A. Submittal of Annual Project Update with updated Project Description Form; B. Reprogramming funds; and C. Annual Status Update This Memorandum of Understanding establishes the City of Hermosa Beach Capital Reserve fund. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTEE and the MTA have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the date noted below: GRANTEE: City of Hermosa Beach LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY By: By: City Manager ROGER SNOBLE Chief Execzaive Officer DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: NAME: TITLE: DATE: DATE APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the County Counsel .."f'Yttfi: Dean Francois To: hermosa beach city "" FACSIMILE COVER PAG" Date: 10/26/04 Time: 4:13:18 PM Page 1 of 1 To : hermosa beach city Sent : 10/26/04 at 4:13:16 PM Subject : RE: Item #2H - Minutes to the Parks Commission From : Dean Francois Pages : 1 (including Cover) Dear mayor & city council RE: Item #2H - Minutes to the Parks Commission Please receive and file this letter at your meeting tonight. An advisory commission does not have authority to make a decision to move volleyball courts on our public beaches. If you place this on a future council agenda item, ensure you have clarified what our commissions should be doing. They should be attempting to come up with a resolution to this minor crisis and present a recommendation to you for approval. Maybe they should look at adding some courts on the beach since they are in such demand and possibly slightly moving that court to the west (9 inches or several feet). Send this back to the commission and make them do their work. Dean Francois 310-318-3326 `a n SUPPLEMENTAL OCT. 25. 2004^ 4:25PM •EMAN FREEMAN, & SMILEY, LLP Arthur Mazirow 3415 Sepulveda Boulevard Penthouse Los Angeles, CA 90034 Phone: 310455-6114 Fax: 310-391.4042 am@ffelaw.com October 25, 2004 1 NO. 9879 P. 2/3 Via Email: Hermosa Beach Cit Council Art Yoon, Mayor artyoon@hotmail.com J. R. Reviczky, Mayor Pro Tempore jbrhbcc@aol.com Michael Keegan michaelkeegan@manhattanbread,com Sam Edgerton samedgerton@aol.com Peter Tucker peter@electpetertucker.com Re: Request for Relocation 27 Feet West from The Strand Wall of Two Existing Beach Volleyball Courts Located Just South of eferred to as the "Relocation tRequest". and The Strand, hereinafter r Dear Council Members: On March 5, 2004 I filed with the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, hereinafter referred to as "Parks and Recreation", the above Relocation Request. A hearing was held on the Relocation Request by Parks and Recreation on May 4, 2004. After approximately one hour of discussion no decision was reached by Parks and Recreation and the Relocation Request hearing was continued until October 5, 2004. On October 5, 2004, after approximately one hour of hearing and discussion, Parks and Recreation voted, three to two, to grant the Relocation Request. The minutes of Parks and Recreation are on the City Council Agenda for October 26, 2004 for approval. I have read in the newspaper that Councilman Sam Edgerton has stated that he will cause the approval of the Relocation Request to be pulled from the consent calendar and will set a hearing on the matter before the City Council at some future date. The purpose of this letter is to ask that the City Council set the hearing on the Relocation Request for some time in March 2005. The reason for the request is to allow the opponents of the Relocation Request and me to submit the issues between us to SUPPLEMENTAL 2n 4NFORM.PTIO OCT. 25. 2004 4:25PM NIEMAN, FREEMAN, & SMILEY, LLP • NO. 9879 P. 3/3 Hermosa Beach City Council Art Yoon, Mayor J. R. Reviczky Michael Keegan Sam Edgerton Peter Tucker October 25, 2004 Page 2 mediation and attempt to settle those issues before the South Bay Center Dispute Resolution Services, hereinafter referred to as the "Mediator". I have been advised that the Mediator is under contract to the City of Hermosa Beach to provide mediation services in this type of dispute. 1 have spoken to Lance Whitman of the Mediator o a he to as Request forstated to e that he would want a maximum of three persons from the pP nth Relocation to be involved in the mediation. I only have the addresses of two volleyball players, of 449 28�" Street, MichaelToole Hermosa 946 9t" Street, Hermosa Beach 90254 and Matt Williamsonfthis letter by overnight courier so that Beach 90254. I am sending to them copies they are aware of mysteps to set in motion the erson who will be representing the group. designation of the p Very truly yours, Arthur Mazirow AM:mf 4297661 fc: Member Park Re eation • mm nit Res • ur - Commis ion c/o Hem�osa Beach City Hal ; 310-372-6186 Robert Bell, Commissioner Howard Fishman, Commissioner Stephen Francis, Commissioner Christine Hollander, Commissioner Bill Segler, Commissioner ec: City Clerk cityclerk@hermosabch.org Borg II Lisa Lynn ynn©rmosabch 2-6186 Fc: Steve Burrell. City Manager 310- 310-33772-0886 Fc: Lance Witman Cc via FedEx: Michael Toole 946 9t" Street, Hermosa Beach 90254 Matt Williamson of 449 28th Street, Hermosa Beach 90254. PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 5, 2004 MEETING The meeting was called to order by Commissioner Hollander at 7:02 p.m. Roll Call: Present: Commissioners Francis, Fishman, Hollander, Bell Commissioner Sigler arrived at 7:04 p.m. Absent: None Also Present: Lisa Lynn, Michael Flaherty Pledge of Allegiance: Carla Merriman Approval of August 3, 2004 Minutes Note: September 7, 2004 meeting canceled. Motion: "To approve as submitted." Fishman/Francis — All Ayes Public Comment None Correspondence None Matters for Commission Consideration The items were addressed out of order, per agenda, but are presented in order here for clarity. 1. Banner Program Request from the Friends of the Parks community foundation for temporary hanging of commercial banners during park renovation projects: Angie Heyming, President of Friends of the Parks. The current project is Fort Lots -O -Fun and the committee devised the Banner Program to directly supplement funds for playground equipment. The banners will be placed on the fences bordering 6th and Prospect to be seen from all sides of the park during the construction phase only. There are strict guidelines regarding what will be placed on the banners. Proposed start date is December. The banners which are temporary and are only for display during the renovation project. Once the park is reopened, the banners will be removed. The proposal was drafted to allow for this program to be utilized at other City parks that may be • • refurbished. Friends of the Parks, as program stewards, will display two banners. The banners will cost approximately $500 and a design proposal must be submitted for approval first. The companies are allowed to use whatever banner company they would like to produce the banner, but again, it must conform to the strict guidelines in place. Commissioner Fishman stated that the organization is only one year old and has raised approximately $12,000 and asked Angie to talk about the upcoming event Pumpkins in the Park at Fort Lots -O -Fun. The event will be from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Saturday, October 16th. Commissioner Hollander also commended Angie for making a sign at South Park on the West side. Angie invited all to attend the Friends of the Parks meetings held the second Wednesday of each month at 710 Pier Avenue, Room 4 at 6:00 p.m. Motion by Commissioner Fishman to approve the Banner Program request from Friends of the Parks. Commissioner Francis seconded the motion. Ayes: Commissioners Fishman, Francis, Hollander, Sigler, Bell Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 2. Beach use permit request from Pacifica Surf League for Redondo Union High School: Mr. John Joseph was not in attendance. Lisa Lynn presented the request. The high school group utilizes the beach in the early morning during the week. there is no conflict with any other Community Resources Department programs. The group is requesting continued use of the beach for the duration of the school year. The approval of this request will bring current usage by Redondo Union High School compliant with City permit procedures for beach use. It will require them to provide the City with a certificate of insurance and place them into the city-wide facility reservations booking system utilized notify the County Guards. Motion by Commissioner Fishman to approve the beach use permit from Pacific Surf League for Redondo Union High School. Commissioner Francis seconded the motion. Ayes: Commissioners Fishman, Francis, Hollander, Sigler, Bell Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 3. Request from the South Bay St. Patrick's Day Weekend Committee (SBSPDC) to • • hold their annual Saint Patrick's Day Parade on March 12, 2005: Mr. Travers Devine presented the request from SBSPDC for the 11th year and stated there were no changes from last year's proposal. The following questions and concerns were presented by the Commission: Commissioner Fishman: Voiced concern that some of the same issues addressed from year to year remain unresolved. Specific items of concern are: signs that were traffic hazards, unprotected cable, incorrect utilization of Lot B and clean-up. SBSPDC answered that as the event date moves closer, items of concern will be addressed. Commissioner Fishman asked Staff if these issues had been addressed in the past. Lisa Lynn stated that at the pre- planning meeting these issues will be addressed with the priority focus on traffic control and street closures. SBSPDC answered that they have addressed some of these issues, but in trying to resolve them, they created other problems. Lisa Lynn concurred with this statement. Commissioner Francis: Also voiced concern over the length of the items that still needed resolution after 11 years. It seemed that some issues could be resolved simply, such as clean-up. Mike Flaherty stated that this is a large event and clean-up issues may be resolved with an earlier set-up of Thursday with a final clean-up on Monday. All large events produce clean-up problems, especially in the downtown area where storm drains are a part of the issue of clean-up. Mike Flaherty also stated that some of the issues listed do go back 11 years, but progress has been made. SBSPDC answered that the event ends on Sunday at 5:00 p.m. and clean-up begins immediately. SBSPDC has had a problem distinguishing their area of responsibilities for clean-up versus normal trash on Monday morning after a weekend. Also believes that the problems are miniscule for such a large event. They are currently working with all City staff to resolve said issues. Commissioner Bell: Would like to see the event as a one day event with just the parade. SBSPDC: If the event is only one day, an additional $50,000 will be needed to subsidize lost sponsors. The festival is an important aspect of the cultural event. The celebration of Irish pride is an important aspect to be considered by the committee. The SBSPDC has spoken with Steve Burrell and the Chamber of Commerce about taking over this event in the future as this may be the last year that SBSPDC organizes this event. A one day event would be preferable, but it would not produce the funds necessary to pay for this event due to the limited area in which the event is held. Lisa Lynn asked for clarification on `festival' — does this mean just the music venue/parade or does'this include the vendors also and if the vendor booths are a vital component to the event. SBSPDC: With just the music/parade, there will be fewer people in attendance. The vendors attract more people and attendance needs to be maintained. The vendor booths are not necessary, except to keep people in the downtown area. Commissioner Fishman: Has participated in this event in the past and believes the cultural aspect of the celebration is most seen in the parade. Is concerned about the impact on the City's infrastructure and the Commission needs to be mindful of two day events. • • Requested Staff investigate having this as a one day event. Lisa Lynn believed that they are within the time frame to investigate a one day event. SBSPDC: Would like this year approved as is and future events investigated as a one day event. If the event is scheduled for one day this year, it will affect the budget and the City will need to supplement the funds. Commissioner Sigler: As this is a large event, believes that SBSPDC would like to have it as simple as possible. Asked Lisa Lynn how long it would take to investigate the cost of having the event modified to one day. Lisa Lynn stated that vendor contracts would need to be looked at and other alternatives to produce events and funds. SBSPDC: Agreed. If funding in place, it is much easier to have the event on one day only but will need at minimum an additional $8,000 in funding. The SBSPDC has not been successful in obtaining large corporate sponsors. Commissioner Hollander: Asked if vendors would continue to support the event if it is reduced to one day. SBSPDC stated that they will need an additional $10,000 to do one day. They will lose approximately 40 vendors. Commissioner Bell: Asked SBSPDC about their timing. SBSPDC stated that the mailings for the events are usually prepared and ready for mailing in December. If the decision delays until November, this will create a problem. Commissioner Francis: Asked about the City's contribution to this event. Lisa Lynn stated that the City contributed approximately $9,700.00 up to $15,000.00. Usually $10,000.00 for the two day event from the DEC fund. Commissioner Francis queried Mike Flaherty regarding the impact on the City to absorb this event. Mike Flaherty stated that currently approximately $3,000 is spent outside of the normal responsibilities and if the event is City -run, then Public Works will be impacted by the cost. The costs may remain the same, but the volunteerism from the SBSPDC has no price tag. SBSPDC: Again, requested that this year's request be approved as is. Commissioner Bell clarified that this Commission does not approve the event, only makes the recommendation to the Council who is responsible for approval. Commissioner Hollander: Sympathetic to the needs of sponsorship and does not want to place undue hardship on the SBSPDC. Commissioner Hollander: Asked about the $5,000 Consulting Fee. SBSPDC explained that this is for the Event Producers which is an aspect that the committee cannot handle as volunteers. Lisa Lynn will work with SBSPDC and have analysis and present to Council for next month's meeting. • • Motion by Commissioner Francis to approve as a one day event. Commissioner Bell seconded the motion. Ayes: Commissioners Fishman, Francis, Hollander, Sigler, Bell Nays: None 1. Abstain: None 2. Absent: None 3. 4. Relocation of two (2) beach volleyball courts situated at 29"' Street and the Strand. Request for consideration is to move the courts 27 feet further west from the Strand wall. Commissioner Hollander invited the Public to speak and stated the rules of only one speaker at a time, with no repeat appearances at the microphone. Public Comments: Art Mazirow 2918 the Strand Filed the motion, was open to questions from the Commission, but opted to reserve comments until after the opposition spoke. Michael Toole, 946 9th Street 1 Attended last meeting and read goal of Community Resources from the website. 2 Focus is the enjoyment of the public beach and parks. 3 Approximately 20 people in opposition in attendance at this meeting, but there were 40 people in attendance at the last meeting and pointed out that only Mr. Mazirow was in attendance. 4 Referred to the specifics on documented dated 8/27/04 Beach Volleyball Court Relocation which charted out all volleyball distances. 5 Cited notes of last meeting of statements by Mr. Flaherty that stated 50 foot distance was a compromise reached in 1996. 6 Cited comments from Commissioner Sigler regarding the same issues of wind, lighter balls now being used and the level of play decreasing "as a result. 7 Cited comments by Commissioner Fishman that there was no way to police the issue with noise as this is a public beach. 8 Believes that the volleyball players took into consideration Mr. Mazirow's concerns and actively worked on abating noise. 9 Stated that no volleyball player would care if courts were moved further out if wind was not an issue. 10 Cited Attachment B and noted that North of 17th Street no net was placed 50' or further out, closer to the Strand the courts were 19', 32' and 35'. Believes these courts were placed at these distances due to the issue of wind. 11 Has never seen Mr. Mazirow on his deck, have seen cleaning staff and maintenance workers only. 12 Noted that volleyball is only played during the day. 13 This is a public place and believes that it is the Commission duty to protect the right to use. 14 At a meeting following the first meeting, players complained about not being able to utilize the courts and not wanting to move to another location and the • • Commission approved the creation of two new courts. Wonders why that type of congestion would be acceptable in this instance. Arturo Livas, 2411 Prospect 1 Attended the last meeting. 2 Concerned that Mr. Mazirow did not know if the volleyball players were outside of the community and then discovered that they were local residents who enjoyed the use of the courts. 3 Mr. Mazirow made no effort to resolve this matter before taking it to the Commission — before or after the first meeting. 4 Volleyball players made an effort to lower the noise during play. 5 Wind is an issue and the lighter volleyballs add to the problem. 6 If there was a concern by the resident, or a group of residents, it should have been brought to the attention of the volleyball players. 7 Have never seen Mr. Mazirow at his place of residence. 8 Wonders how one person's concern can outweigh the concerns of many. Matt Williamson, 449 28th Street 1 7 year resident. 2 Thanked Commission for their time. 3 Emphasized volleyball rules are a significant factor and affect the quality of play. 4 Wind is a factor the closer you are to the water and also causes frequent replacement of volleyball poles — which , he believes are paid for by the volleyball players, not the City. 5 Volleyball brings -a lot to the community. 6 Does respect Mr. Mazirow's ownership and his desire to enjoy his residence. 7 Does not believe that noise is only from volleyball players. Feels that this is a result of the rapid growth of the City. 8 Lives near Valley Park and now that it has been renovated. 9 Non -volleyball players who enjoy the games contribute to the noise as well, not just the players. 10 Cited two Strand residents who are in favor of the volleyball courts' location but are no longer available to comment: Mr. Charlie Welch (was instrumental in the original placement of the courts) who passed away last year and Ms. Kristy Hahn who moved away from the Strand. 11 Saw Mr. Mazirow on three occasions only. 12 If courts are moved out further, this will not allow both courts to be utilized promoting less participation. Aaron Kasdorf, 2827 Manhattan Avenue 1 Read a letter from Charlie Welch's daughters: Marsha Walland and Elaine Welch who supports the current placement of the volleyball courts. 2 Stated that the actual poles are two lots away from Mr. Mazirow's house but closer to the Welch's residence. 3 After the last meeting, all volleyball players spoke with Mr. Mazirow who voiced his concern that he thought the players were from out of the area coming into the area to create a ruckus and subsequently learned that the players were local. 4 Agreed with Mr. Mazirow that if there were any problems — he would speak to the volleyball players. Since the last meeting, there has been no communication with Mr. Mazirow and believed the matter was resolved. 5 Wants the court to remain where they are. • Dennis Fernandez, 1816 Stanford Avenue, Redondo Beach 1 Spoke at the last meeting. 2 Lived on the Strand in Manhattan Beach approximately 5 years ago. 3 Understands Mr. Mazirow's issue with the noise but you deal with it. 4 Embraced Mr. Mazirow's concerns from the last meeting and policed themselves with respect to noise. 5 Met Mr. Mazirow's great-niece one weekend and she stated that Mr. Mazirow is never at his residence and is always in Montecito where most of their time is spent. 6 Saw Mr. Mazirow and his wife one weekend. 7 Concerned that Mr. Mazirow never followed-up with volleyball players. Tom Perone, 412 29th Street 1 Resident, off and on, since 1978. 2 Has the flexibility in his job during the summer months and has rarely seen Mr. Mazirow and his wife during the months of August/September. 3 During the past summer, volleyball players have utilized the courts on Sundays no more than 2 — 3 times. Mike Coull, 1721 Monterey 1 Wants to go on record to reiterate significant points. 2 If you note the distance of two courts — they are close to the Strand due to geography. 3 If moved, second court will be compromised. 4 Wind is a factor with the lighter balls. 5 Believed that they have toned down noise. 6 Not seen Mr. Mazirow at the court since the last hearing. 7 Asked that Commission please consider geography when making their decision. Art Mazirow, 2918 the Strand 1 Full-time resident since 1978. 2 Is a lawyer and is very busy. 3 There has been an improvement in the noise level. 4 The courts are very popular. 5 Does not mean that since he is not seen, that he is not home. 6 Lived in this location since 1986 and the noise has only recently become a problem. 7 Realizes that he must share the beach. 8 Only asking that the courts be moved out 27'. 9 Stated that he was uncomfortable with being a policeman by asking the players to lower the volume. 10 Understands that the noise does not come from just the players. Comments/Questions from Commission Commissioner Sigler 1 Concerned that this issue was not resolved and has come before the Commission once again. 2 Stated that the area is densely populated and therefore, noise will be a factor. 3 Concerned that Mr. Mazirow did not try to resolve issue with the volleyball players. Mr. Mazirow stated that he did not want to be a policeman and did not recognize the players. 4 Felt that at last meeting with discussions that took place after the meeting between Mr. Mazirow and the volleyball players this matter could have been resolved without coming back to the Commission for resolution. Commissioner Hollander 1 Asked Mr. Mazirow if second court is not being used. Mr. Mazirow stated he has observed it being used, but the court closer to the Strand is preferred. Public Forum Closed Discussion Among Commissioners Commissioner Bell: 2 Questioned Mike Flaherty about why the City picked 50' for placement of courts. Mike Flaherty stated that this was a compromised placement, whether North or South. The 35' court no longer exists — Attachment B is an old list (April 2004). Commissioner Francis: 3 Very disappointed that the has come back to the Commission, thought the matter had been resolved. 4 Is in the middle of a remodel and currently living on the Strand next to 19th street courts. 5 The last two weekends, have walked past this court and did not notice any excessive noise above norm. Commissioner Fishman: 1 Both sides have issues. 2 Standards have been established, compromising at 50'. 3 Disappointed that this matter has not been resolved and is before the Commission once again. 4 Disturbed by the comments of outsiders vs. locals — the courts are for public use. 5 Has corresponded with another resident, Rob Desantis, 2909 the Strand, who believes there needs to be consistency and agrees with the relocation of the courts. 6 Will look at case on a trial basis, but knows that someone will leave unhappy. 7 Understands the wind issue for volleyball players. 8 Stated there are 65 courts throughout Hermosa Beach and courts are also available in Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach to avoid the wind factor. 9 Believes that athletes will need to adjust to the conditions of the playing environment. 10 Supports the 27' relocation of courts because this is the residence of Mr. Mazirow, along with Mr. Desantis'. Commissioner Hollander: 1 Sought clarification from staff. Mike Flaherty stated that all courts were removed in 1980 due to El Nino and the City may have not been as diligent in replacing the courts. Lisa Lynn stated that any new courts that are added are required to be placed at a distance of 50' west of the Strand wall, except for those courts that were grand fathered in — these are handled on a case-by-case basis. 2 Believes that a major move is not required as there are many courts in this general area. • • 3 In favor of the relocation of the courts. Commissioner Sigler: 1 Cited there is a problem with moving around and infringing on other courts and players. 2 Problem with seeing the olive branch extended and issue not resolved even that both parties are reasonable. 3 Court is not directly located in from of Mr. Mazirow's residence. 4 Why isn't there a problem with those residences directly in front of courts. 5 Disappointed that the issues is back again. Should have been resolved by either talking it out, calling the police or bring in other residents who are similarly affected by the current location of the courts. 6 Is opposed to the relocation of the courts, they should remain in the current location. Motion by Commissioner Fishman to relocate the two (2) beach volleyball courts located at the 29th Street and the Strand to 50'. Commissioner Bell seconded the motion. Ayes: Commissioners Fishman, Hollander, Bell Nays: Sigler, Francis. Abstain: None Absent: None Staff Report(s): Lisa Lynn reiterated the financial statistics for August 2004, as there was no meeting in September. Registration for the youth programs doubled from last year and revenue was up accordingly. The budget is $33,000 ahead from the month of August, 2003. Commissioner's Reports: Hermosa Arts Foundation - Commissioner Hollander: This week CLO is coming back. The show will run from 10/5 — 17, Late Night Catechism — sequel to the original. Invited everyone to come out and enjoy. Surfin' Hermosa — Commissioner Hollander: The event was a great success. Surf boards were auctioned off at great prices. Friends of the Park Foundation — Hollander: Big event will be held October 16, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at Fort Lots -O -Fun. Come out and enjoy. Or come out and attend meetings held the 2"d Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. in Room 4 of the Community Center. Commissioner Bell: The money raised by Friends of the Parks is going towards new park equipment, currently at Fort Lots -O -Fun. Commissioner Hollander: They are currently working on the design of the playgrounds, so all are welcomed to come out and be a part. • • Museum Subcommittee Report — Commission Fishman: The Historical Society's next meeting is Wednesday, October 20th. Meetings are held the third Wednesday of each month at 710 Pier Avenue. The Subcommittee is always looking for more people to participate in the Historical Society. They are currently planning a jazz fundraiser in February 2005, honoring Howard Rumsey, with proceeds going towards the museum expansion. They are still applying for grants. December 16-18, Jane Pieplow who runs a museum in Nevada will spend three (3) days consulting with Hermosa Beach Museum Board of Directors, assisting with collections management, taking care of artifacts and document and will consult with the Historical Society on overall improvement of the fundraising and expansion operations. Commissioner Hollander took a moment to comment on upcoming events: 1 Triathlon, Sunday, October 10th, starting at 7:00 a.m. 2 Pumpkins in the Park on Saturday, October 16th from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at Fort Lots -O -Fun (at 6th and Prospect) 3 Flashlight Trick or Treat taking place Friday, October 22nd at South Park from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. 4 Halloween Carnival at Hermosa Valley School on Friday, October 29th from 4:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Newly partnered with the School District as the previous location, the Clark Building has overrun its capacity, as is the case with all youth programs. Commissioner Sigler: Thanked Lisa Lynn for her negotiation with American Express for $75,000. A portion will be utilized for the summer concerts and a portion for park equipment. Items Requested by Commissioners Commissioner Fishman: Appreciates the Action minutes (interdepartmental preplan and after action meeting minutes) and likes the cooperation of the City Departments. Lisa Lynn stated that she will continue to provide these minutes for the Commission. At the last meeting, Commissioner Fishman requested progress reports on Fort Lots -O -Fun, Bowling Green and Edith Rodeway Park. Lisa Lynn stated that nothing has changed since the last progress report, but she will continue to provide the information in Commission packets. Commissioner Sigler: AVP next year will need to add another day for tear down and clean-up, but in the haste things are missed in the sand (chunks of cement, wood). This issue needs to be addressed as this may be a liability issue. Lisa Lynn stated that this has been recommended and AVP is in agreement. Commissioner Fishman: Need to address the security issue of people sitting in the bleachers during construction. Mike Flaherty stated that this has been observed by all departments and all have arrived at the same conclusion. Also recommended longer set-up times, as well as clean-up time. It should be noted that this is the first time AVP presented this event alone. Lisa Lynn stated that all departments work very closely together and are in agreement. Other Matters Michael Flaherty: Invited the Commissioners to take the time to visit the Pier Head and view the Pier reconstruction. Life Guard towers are almost completely torn down. Believes that construction will be completed in April or May 2005, but the actual date is July 2005. Public Comment N/A Motion: "To Adjourn at 9:00 p.m." Francis/Fishman — All Ayes 14,44 • October 20, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 26, 2004 PURCHASE OF SPEED RADAR SIGNAGE FOR THE STRAND Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the expenditure of $18,861.25 for the purchase of two speed radar signs to be placed on the Strand at 11th Street and 14th Street; and 2. Appropriate $20,000 from Transportation Development Act Funds for, purchase and installation costs. Summary: Last August, Fortel Traffic, Inc. installed a Speed Radar Traffic Calming Device at 11th Street on the Strand. This is a solar -powered unit that the company provided at our request, for a two-month trial period. This was done as part of an ongoing effort to slow bicyclists down to our newly posted 8 mph speed limit on the Strand. The sign was set to display the actual speed of the bicyclist traveling between 5 — 10 mph and then displaying the message "SLOW DOWN 8" for speeds greater than 10 mph. The reason for this being that they did not want to encourage speeding to see how fast they could go. The unit is programmable with many display options. The sign also recorded volume and speed data. For a ten-day period beginning September 26th and ending October 4th, the unit detected 47,599 pedestrians and bicyclists traveling at 5 mph or greater. They could have set the threshold for detection limit at .5 mph to get a total traffic count but unfortunately did not. Of those detected, 22,266 were "speeding" at over 8 mph and 15 were traveling at the maximum speed detected of 31 mph! Staff proposes to install one of these traffic -calming devices at each end of the "bicycle walk zone" on the Strand at 11th Street and 14th Street. They will be hard -wired and therefore will not need the expensive solar panel. The total cost for two units as used in the demonstration is $14,531.25. They also offer modified units that can also display the message 'WALK BIKE" for a total amount of $18,861.25. Staff recommends the latter option, which would help reinforce the meaning of the flashing red lights on weekends and holidays. Staff also recommends using Transportation Development Funds (TDA) funds to purchase these devices. This is a sole source purchase, as there are no other manufacturers of this type of small speed radar signage. Public Works staff will install these units and the necessary wiring. 2o Staff has received numerous comments from residents that thought the signs were effective. Sgt. Thompson of the Police Department also observed some calming affect and Chief Lavin supports this purchase. The signs could also facilitate periodic police enforcement of speeding on the Strand. Another idea for Council consideration would be to seek out volunteers from the community to serve as a Hermosa Beach Volunteer Patrol Officers that could help encourage observing the posted speed limit. With the aid of these speed signs, a uniformed individual could easily request individual speeders to slow down. Many cities utilize this resource for these types of issues. Fiscal Impact: A total of $18,861.25 would be expended of Transportation Development Act funds. The City has a total of $36,844 of available TDA funds. Attachments: Vcalm Product Information Sheet Respectfully submitted, Richard ',organ, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director 2 Concur: Steph R.urre City nager H:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\speed signage 10-26-04. Fo�iel Traffic,nc. "Improving the safety of our streets" VCALMTM Traffic Calming Device Fortel Traffic, Inc., the leader in traffic calming devices for school zones and high speed areas has developed VCa1mTM. VCaImTM has 16" lower digit displays that can be seen upwards of 1100 feet away. VCaImTM comes with custom software and count capabilities. VCa1mTMs large storage for vehicle data allows for up to 100,000 counts a day for 30 days which makes VCaImTM #1 in the market. Specifications Dimensions: Overall: 45"(h) x 28.5"(w) x 4.5"(d) Letters: 6"(h) x 4"(w) Amber LED's Numerals: 16"(h) x 9"(w) Amber LED's Messages: "Speed Limit", "Your Speed", "Slow Down", and Blank 9 programmable combinations offered, custom combinations avaiable. Power: 120v AC (1.2 amps) (Model 120VAC19HW) 240v AC (.525 amps) (Model 240VAC 19HW) 24v DC Solar (.096 kw/hr) (Model 024VDC19HW) ForTcl Traffic, Inc. 837 Industrial Drive. #4 Hollister. CA 95023 Phone: (831) 636-7800 Fax: (831) 636-8627 url: www.forteltraffic.com email: sontact(fortcltrafiic.com MUTCD Approved Radar: Low Power - K -Band Part 15 Certified No operating license required Weight: 48 lbs. Construction: Frame: Heavy Duty (.090 Gauge) Welded Aluminum Lens: 3/8" Poly Carbonate. 1/2" Available. Brightness Control: Dimming control allows user to brighten or dim the displays as needed. Options, Communication: 1. Infrared Port for PDA devices. 2. PC RS -232 Port for PDA, Personal, or other portable type computer device. 3. Wireless Modem for remote access via internet. Oct�t20 04 11:08a Fortel Traffic • Forte) Traffic. Inc 1559 Harmony Cede Anaheim, CA 92807 Phone: (714) 701.9800 Far. (714) 6938627 un: www forteUratfc Com em* tonlaral(onelMarnn cern Name / Address City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Rick Morgan 7146938627 • p.1 Quote Date Quote # 10/20/2004 2036 RFQ # Terms Rep FOB Project Fax No. email 1% 20 Net 30 LJC Destination 2036-VCalm... 310-937-5015 Item Description Qty Rate Total VCALM-120-... VC -PDA -01P Labor -01 VCaIm(tm), 120 VAC, 45" X 28.5" X 4.5"( Standard Legend -Your Speed & Slow Down) Programmer, PDA w/ VSpeed(tm) Software Labor - installation Available 2 1 2 t.., 6,000.00 500.00 500.00 i •Thank 12,000.00T 500.00T 1,000.00 you for the R.F.Q. Subtotal $13,500.00 Sales Tax (8.25%) $1,031.25 Total $14,531.25 I —i Oct 20 04 11: 08a Foriil Traffic Fortel Traffic, Inc. 1559 Harmony Circle Anaheim. CA 92807 Phone: (714) 701-9800 Fax: (714) 693-8627 urt: YOZthitere&agn email: otnlasatar eltraftic com Name / Address City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Rick Morgan Item Rep FOB 714938627 p.2 Quote Date Quote # 10/20/2004 2037 Project Fax No. 1% 20 Net 30 LJC Destination 2037-walk/bi... 310-937-5015 RFQ # Terms VCALM-120-... VC -PDA -01P Labor -01 Description VCalm(tm), 120 VAC, 45" X 28.5" X 4.5" - Special optional Legend to say "Walk Bike" Programmer, PDA w/ VSpeed(tm) Software Labor -installation Available Thank you for the R.F.Q. Qty 2 1 2 Rate 8,000.00 Subtotal 500.00 500.00 email Total 16,000.00T 500.00T 1,000.00 $17,500.00 Sales Tax (8.25%) $1,361.25 Total $18,861.25 • Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council 1111 October 19, 2004 Regular Meeting of October 26, 2004 NEW YEAR'S EVE CELEBRATION – DECEMEBR 31, 2004 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the implementation of a New Year's Eve Celebration. 2. Select entertainment venue proposal for musical performance conducted by "Big Band 2000" from 8:00 PM to 12:15 AM. Background The New Year's Eve Celebration on Pier Plaza was first produced in 1999, to commemorate the new millennium. Each year thereafter, live musical performances of "Big Band 2000" have attracted thousands of spectators to the plaza. Analysis In coordination with City staff, Gerald Ishibashi of Stonebridge Productions has repeatedly produced this event to include musicians, amplified sound, lighting, stage, generator, operations crew and technicians. This is the same production company utilized for the Sunset Concert series. The concert production fee for New Year's Eve is $22,500. An additional $3,500 is expended for portable toilets, clean-up crews, and peripheral lights. Fiscal Impact: $26,000 budgeted from DEC fund - Special Events Attachments: A. Professional Services Agreement Respectfully submitted, ' ASD I A�— Lisa Lynn, Supervisor Community Resources Department Concur, Step a Burre l Ci y Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director p City of Hermosa Beach PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT: STONEBRIDGE PRODUCTIONS 2004-2005 NEW YEAR'S EVE CELEBRATION ARTICLE I — Scope of Work STONEBRIDGE PRODUCTIONS (STONEBRIDGE) shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to CITY to produce a 2004-2005 New Year's Eve big band performance on the Downtown Pier Plaza. STONEBRIDGE SHALL PERFORM THE FOLLOWING: (a) produce a show featuring an 18- piece big band called "Big Band 2000" who will perform on the Pier Plaza from 8:00 PM - 12:15 AM on December 31, 2004 — January 1, 2005. STONEBRIDGE shall: (a) negotiate and will be solely responsible to fulfill the conditions and payments of all performance contracts and technical contracts for the performance including all licensing requirements, (b) provide and assemble the stage, lighting equipment, and all sound equipment necessary for the performance (set-up times to be scheduled by mutual agreement between CITY and STONEBRIDGE), (c) provide a generator adequate to supply power for all performance -related electrical needs, (d) provide two (2) security guards to be stationed behind the stage, and, (e) remove all staging and concert equipment from the Plaza by January 3, 2005. STONEBRIDGE shall take adequate measures to protect performers and equipment in the event of mild inclement weather. In the event of inclement weather that would impede the performance as to make it impractical, STONEBRIDGE will be responsible to pay all expenses associated with producing the event. Should that occur, CITY will pay no more than $2,000 to reimburse STONEBRIDGE for the purchase of event cancellation insurance, or to assist with production expenses incurred by STONEBRIDGE. Should the event be cancelled, all deposits paid by CITY to STONEBRIDGE shall be returned to CITY by January 6, 2005. CITY agrees to pay $22,500 to STONEBRIDGE as follows: (a) a progress payment of $10,000 once STONEBRIDGE provides sufficient evidence that the entertainment and technical contract(s) have been secured and (b) final payment of $12,500 upon performance completion on December 31, 2004. ARTICLE II — Indemnity STONEBRIDGE agrees to indemnify CITY, its' officers, employees and agents against, and will hold and save each of them harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision or other organization arising out of the negligent acts or intentional tortious acts, errors or omission of STONEBRIDGE, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees, provided for herein. STONEBRIDGE will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees incurred in connection herewith. STONEBRIDGE will promptly pay any judgement rendered against CITY, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities. In the event CITY, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against STONEBRIDGE for such damages or other claims arising out of or in I connection with the sole negligence of STONEBRIDGE hereunder, STONEBRIDGE agrees to pay CITY, its officers, agents, or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by CITY, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees. ARTICLE III — Insurance STONEBRIDGE shall obtain and retain Worker's Compensation Insurance for all STONEBRIDGE employees to the extent required by the State of California. STONEBRIDGE shall provide CITY with a Certificate of Insurance for general liability with minimum coverage's of $1,000,000 per occurrence, $1,000,000 for injury to one person/single occurrence, and $2,000,000 aggregate. This certificate shall name the CITY of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees as additional insured. Automobile liability insurance with minimum coverages of $1,000,000 for property damage, $1,000,000 for injury to one single person/single occurrence, and $2,000,000 for injury to more than one person/single occurrence. For any claims related to this project, STONEBRIDGE insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects CITY, its trustees, officers, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the CITY, its trustees, officers, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of STONEBRIDGE insurance and shall not contribute with it. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to CITY. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A: VII. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STONEBRIDGE PRODUCTIONS Stephen Burrell, City Manager Gerald Ishibashi, Promoter • • October 13, 2004 City Council Meeting October 26, 2004 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 04-1243 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CORRECTING ERRORS MADE IN THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 02-1221, AMENDING SECTION 17.44.090 — TO REMOVE LEASED OFF-SITE PARKING AS AN OPTION FOR REQUIRED PARKING, AND AMENDING SECTION 17.28.020 — TO REMOVE STORAGE AND MINI -STORAGE AS PERMITTED USES, AND TO REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR CERTAIN MANUFACTURING USES IN THE M-1 ZONE." Submitted for adoption and waiver of full reading is Ordinance No. 04-1243, relating to ' the above subject. At the meeting of October 12, 2004, the ordinance was presented to the City Council for consideration and was introduced by the following vote: Noted: AYES: Edgerton, Keegan, Reviczky, Tucker, Mayor Yoon NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None • Stephen R. Burkll, � anag Elaine Doerfling, City CI 3a ORDINANCE NO. 04-1243 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CORRECTING ERRORS MADE IN THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 02-1221, AMENDING SECTION 17.44.090 -TO REMOVE LEASED OFF-SITE PARKING AS AN OPTION FOR REQUIRED PARKING, AND AMENDING SECTION 17.28.020 — TO REMOVE STORAGE AND MINI - STORAGE AS PERMITTED USES, AND TO REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR CERTAIN MANUFACTURING USES IN THE M-1 ZONE. The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on October 12, 2004 to correct an error in Ordinance No. 02-1221, approved July 27, 2002, regarding the leasing of required parking and changes to the M-1 permitted use list. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on August 17, 2004 to correct the errors in Ordinance No. 02-1221, approved July 27, 2002, regarding the leasing of required parking and changes to the M-1 permitted use list. SECTION 3. Based on the evidence considered at the public hearing, the City Council makes the following findings: 1. The City Council previously considered the proposed text amendment regarding off- site parking and determined that providing leased off-site parking creates problems relative to enforcement of parking regulations. 2. The City Council previously adopted Ordinance .99-1193 which established a new M-1 permitted use list which did not include storage and mini -storage uses as permitted uses, determining that it would help maintain suitable locations for manufacturing uses, and also included conditional use permits for certain uses. When Ordinance No. 02- 1221 was adopted to change the M-1 permitted use only to add parking lots and structures to the M-1 permitted use and no other changes, these 1999 amendments regarding storage and mini -storage uses, and conditional use permit requirements for 1 04-1243 • certain manufacturing uses were inadvertently not included in the final adopted ordinance. 3. The proposed text amendment will correct the errors, which occurred with adoption of Ordinance No. 02-1221. 4. The subject text amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to the general rule set forth in Section 15061(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as there is no possibility that the modification to the text may have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 4. Based on the foregoing, the City Council amends the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Title 17 -Zoning, as follows: 1. Amend Section 17.28.020 to read as follows: "Sec. 17.28.020 Permitted Uses In the following matrix, the letter "P" designates use classifications permitted and the letter "U" designates use classifications permitted by approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Use classifications not listed are prohibited. Section numbers listed under "see section" reference additional regulations located elsewhere in the Zoning Ordinance or Municipal Code. M-1 ZONE, LAND USE REGULATIONS P = Permitted U = C.U.P. Required (See Article 10) Administrative offices accessory to a primary permitted use I (listed below), not exceeding twenty-five percent of the gross floor area 2 04-1243 2' 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 f USE ISee Section Artist studio P Audio/Visual recording studio P Motor Vehicle and equipment service: • General repair, service, installation of parts and accessories • Body repair and painting U U Chapter 17.40 Chapter 17.40 Manufacturing, fabrication, assembly, testing, repair, servicing and processing of the following products and materials: Coated, plated and engraved metal products Die cut paper, paperboard, cardboard Machinery Equipment and supplies Surfboards U Chapter 17.40 Manufacturing, fabrication, assembly, testing, repair, servicing and processing of the following products and materials Apparel Audio/Visual products Awnings Bakery Products Communications Equipment P 3 04-1243 • • USE See Section Confectionery and related products Electronic components, computers, and accessories Electric lighting and wiring equipment Stone and cut stone products Furniture and fixtures Glass products Household tools and hardware Jewelry, silverware, and plated ware Luggage Motor vehicle parts and accessories Musical instruments and parts Office and household machines and appliances Office products Paperboard containers and boxes Pharmaceutical Products Photographic and optical goods, watches and clocks Hardware, plumbing, heating equipment and supplies Pottery and related products Professional, scientific and controlling instruments Toys, amusements, sporting and athletic goods (including surfboards) Wooden containers 4 04-1243 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 USE II il 0 i See Section Parking lots and/or structures P Wholesale distribution of the products and materials listed above, and including the following: Packaged groceries and related products P Warehousing P 2. Amend Section 17.44.090 to read as follows: "Section 17.44.090 Off-street Parking Location All off-street automobile -parking facilities shall be located as follows: A. All required parking spaces shall be located on the same lot or building site as the use for which such spaces are provided; provided however, that such parking spaces provided for commercial, business, industrial or warehouse uses may be located on a different lot or lots, all of which are less than three hundred (300) feet distant from the use for which it is provided, and such lot or lots are under common ownership with the lot or building site for which such spaces are provided. Where the buildings are situated on one lot and the parking is situated on another lot, the owner shall file with the Community Development Department an affidavit recorded by the office of the Los Angeles County recorder that these lots are held in common ownership for the use specified. Such distance shall be measured along a straight line drawn between the nearest point on the premises devoted to the use served by such parking facilities and the nearest point on the premises providing such parking facilities. 5 04-1243 • • It is further provided that uses located within the boundaries of an established off- street parking district, organized pursuant to action by the city council, shall be waived by the requirements of this subsection." SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Hermosa Beach in the manner provided by law. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. vote: PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 26th day of October, 2004 by the following AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney 6 04-1243 • • October 13, 2004 City Council Meeting October 26, 2004 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 04-1244 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A DAYTIME CURFEW FOR MINORS AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." Submitted for adoption and waiver of full reading is Ordinance No. 04-1244, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of October 12, 2004, the ordinance was presented to the City Council for consideration and was introduced by the following vote: Noted: AYES: Keegan, Reviczky, Tucker, Mayor Yoon NOES: Edgerton ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Stephen R. B rrll, i y ' anager Elaine Doerrling, City Cle 3b • • ORDINANCE NO. 04-1244 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A DAYTIME CURFEW FOR MINORS AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Title 9 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended by adding thereto a new Chapter 9.32 to read as follows: Chapter 9.32 DAYTIME JUVENILE CURFEWS Sections: 9.32.010 Definitions. 9.32.020 Prohibited Act. 9.32.030 Exemptions. 9.32.040 Infraction Penalty. 9.32.050 Hearing requirement parental obligations to attend. 9.32.060 Penalty may be sent aside for first infraction Section 9.32.010 Definitions Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the terms used in this Chapter will be defined as follows: "Establishment" means any privately owned place of business operated for a profit to which the public is invited, including without limitation, places of amusement or entertainment, retail stores and eating places. "Guardian" means a person who, under court order, has legal charge or custody of a minor. "Minor" means any person under eighteen (18) years of age. "Public Place" means any place to which the public has access, including without limitation, public buildings, public parks, playgrounds, the beach, schools (other than the school at which the minor is enrolled), and common areas of condominiums and apartment buildings, office buildings and transportation facilities. 1 04-1244 • • 4 "Public Street" means any public street, highway, road, avenue, sidewalk, alley, parkway or other right-of-way. Section 9.32.020 Prohibited act. It shall be unlawful for any minor to be present in or remain in or upon any public street, public place, or any establishment, vacant lot or other unsupervised place during the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. of the same day on days when said minor's school is in session. It shall also be unlawful for a parent or guardian of a minor to knowingly permit, or by insufficient control, allow a minor for whom they are responsible, to remain in any public place or on the premises of any establishment within the City during these daytime curfew hours. Section 9.32.030 Exemptions. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply under any one of the following circumstances: A. The minor has in his or her possession a written excuse from the minor's parent(s), legal guardian(s), or other adult person(s) having the legal care or custody of said minor, which excuse provides a reasonable explanation, as determined by the court, for the minor' s absence from school; B. The minor is accompanied by his or her parent(s), legal guardian(s), or other adult person(s) having the legal care or custody of the minor; C. The minor is upon an emergency errand directed by said minor's parent(s), legal guardian(s), or other adult person(s) having the legal care or custody of the minor; D. The minor is going to or returning directly from a medical appointment; E. The minor has permission to leave campus and said minor has in his or her possession a valid, school -issued, off -campus permit; F. The minor is going to or returning directly from a public meeting, or place of public entertainment, such as a movie, play, sporting event, dance or school activity, provided such meeting, event or activity is a school -approved activity for the minor or is otherwise supervised by school personnel of said minor's school; 2 04-1244 G. The presence of the minor in said place or places is connected with or required by a school - approved or school -related business, trade, profession or occupation in which said minor is lawfully engaged; H. The minor, due to split sessions or year round school, is not required at the time he or she is found, to be in attendance at school; I. When the minor is exempt by law from compulsory education or compulsory continuation education; J. When the minor is authorized to be absent from his school pursuant to the provisions of California Education Code Section 48205 or any other applicable State or Federal law; K. The minor is emancipated pursuant to law; L. The minor is in a motor vehicle involved in interstate travel; or M. The minor is engaged in an activity protected by the United States or California constitutions. Section 9.32.040 Infraction - Penalty. Violation of this Chapter shall constitute an infraction punishable by a fine as provided for in Section 1.12.010(B) of this Code. Section 9.32.050 Hearing requirement - Parental obligation to attend. A minor cited for an infraction for violation of a provision of this Chapter must attend a court hearing on the infraction and must be accompanied at the hearing by all of the persons (or person) having the legal care or custody of said minor. If any such person fails to attend the hearing with the minor, and unless the interests of justice would otherwise be served, the court shall continue the hearing and shall issue a citation to said person directing said person to appear at the continued hearing with the minor. Section 4.124.060 Penalty may be set aside for first infraction. Notwithstanding the provisions of this chapter, the court may set aside the fine imposed by this Chapter, or any portion thereof, if the fine is based on the minor's first infraction under this Chapter and provided the minor produces proof satisfactory to the court that the following has 3 04-1244 • • occurred during the period between the initial hearing on the infraction and any subsequent hearing set by the court: A. The minor has had no unexcused absences from school; and, as directed by the court, either or both of the following: B. The minor has performed ten (10) hours of court -approved community service during times other than said minor's hours of school attendance; and/or C. The minor's parent(s), legal guardian(s), or other adult person(s) who have the legal care or custody of said minor, has or have attended a parenting class or a series of parenting classes approved by the court. SECTION 2. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. vote: PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 26th day of October, 2004 by the following AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney 4 04-1244 RECEIVED OCT 21 2004 COM. DEV. DEPT. 3410 HERMOSA AVE. PROPOSED ADDITION COM. DEV. Daly Genik 1666 1016 81.13664C 3.4114 O 0401.06 ▪ 310.066.91W IF: 3101E6.3163 4•1o60•60.6.1." 34TH STREET PROJECT .,S)-Le446—A 101-alloci-, et. itui-V • • REASONS FOR CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE VARIANCE 04-03 BASIC PREMISE: AFFIRMATIVE FINDINGS CAN BE MADE IN SUPPORT OF THE APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE TO MAINTAIN A 3 -FOOT SIDE YARD SUSEQUENT TO THE MERGER OF TWO 30 -FOOT WIDE LOTS. REASONS/FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF PREMISE: 1. Although the subject lots are typical of surrounding properties, what is unique and exceptional is that when combined, the side -yard requirement increases even though the circumstances of the surrounding lots and development pattern do not change. Finding #1: Application of the 5 -foot side yard minimum to an existing condition that is otherwise consistent with the prevailing side yard requirements of the neighborhood is an extraordinary circumstance and creates an unnecessary hardship to the applicant (strict application of the new set -back standard requires removal of 51 feet of the existing home). 2. Although other options may be available to the applicant to exercise its property right to construct an addition, the City Council should approve a variance that supports the best alternative available to the applicant to exercise his property right to expand his home. Finding #2: The exercise and enjoyment of the applicant's property right to expand an existing single-family home is best served by preserving the architecturally significant home and approving the retention of the 3 -foot side yard that is otherwise typical for all other 30 - foot wide lots in the surrounding vicinity. 3. Although planning policy makers are always cautious in granting variances that set a precedent, in the instant matter, the granting of the requested variance is good public policy and would set a precedent that, if emulated by others, would be a benefit to the immediate neighborhood and to the City of Hermosa Beach. • The proposed addition is smaller in scale than allowed by code and results in a much lower build -out density than is otherwise possible in the surrounding neighborhood. • The reduced scale and bulk of the proposed project will afford and preserve better ocean views and light/air circulation for project neighbors and allow for more landscaped and open space area at the corner of Hermosa Avenue and 34th Street. • The project includes one garage space and two guest parking spaces, thus substantially reducing the need for on -street parking. CONCLUSION: As stated in the staff report, "a Variance is not intended to be a grant of a special privilege, but a means to address unique conditions, while ensuring that there is parity with surrounding properties." The subject variance meets this standard and should be supported and approved by the City Council in order to promote the benefits outlined above. at ..P t! -a -vv _ ' 5"A 3w�K�• .ai3Se-/St • • October 18, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council October 26, 2004 SUBJECT: VARIANCE 04-3, APPEAL 3410 HERMOSA AVENUE (AND 111 34Th STREET) APPELLANT: LASALLE BANK, 401 B STREET, SUITE 320 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 REQUEST: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 3 -FOOT SIDE YARD FOR AN EXISTING BUILDING, RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 5 -FEET, WITH THE INCREASED SETBACK REQUIREMENT CAUSED BY MERGING TWO LOTS. Planning Commission Recommendation To deny the requested Variance. Background The applicant is proposing to merge two existing 30 -foot wide lots together, and maintain the existing dwelling at 3410 Hermosa Avenue with its current 3 -foot north side yard. The Planning Commission considered the Variance request at their August 17, 2004 meeting and the majority voted to deny the request because they could not find that the property was denied a substantial property right possessed by others in the vicinity and zone. The Commission felt the applicant has the option to maintain the property as two separate lots, and build a detached guest home eliminating the need for a Variance. Project Information ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: EXISTING LOT SIZE: PROPOSED LOT SIZE (MERGED LOTS) EXISTING/PRIOR USES: PROPOSED USE: EXISTING FLOOR AREA (3410 HERMOSA): PROPOSED ADDITION: PERCENT INCREASE IN VALUATION: R-3 High Density Residential 2550 Square Feet (30' X 85') 5100 Square Feet (60' X 85') Two separate single-family homes Single family dwelling w/ addition 4,431 Square Feet 680 Square Foot guest room, garage, terrace and pool 25% The three-story home at 3410 Hermosa Avenue was constructed in 1982, in conformance with the 3 - foot side yard requirements for a 30 -foot wide lot, and in accordance with the 35 -foot height limit in effect at that time. The building is nonconforming to the current 30 -foot height limit and to the front yard and parking setback requirement, as the existing dwelling exceeds 30 -feet in height, the front yard is 7 feet rather than the required 10 -feet, and the garage is setback 11.5 feet rather than 17 feet from the sidewalk. These nonconforming conditions are not being changed, and therefore the project is subject to Chapter 17.52 and is limited to an increase of 50% in valuation. Analysis The Variance is required because of the proposed design of the project. The appelant is proposing to merge two existing 30 -foot wide lots, and maintain the existing dwelling with its current 3 -foot north side yard in order to construct a connecting guest room with a bridge at the second floor level. The 1 • • merger of the two lots increases the side yard requirement from 3 feet to 5 feet, (10% of the lot width, up to a maximum of 5 -feet). The project also includes demolishing the existing dwelling at 111 34th Street (which has already occurred), and constructing and connecting an addition to the existing dwelling at 3410 Hermosa Avenue extending south over the former 111 34th Street property. The addition includes a guest room, terrace, pool and additional garage parking. The proposed addition is in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, and consists of less than 50% increase in valuation. The lot merger is needed to accommodate the applicant's plan to connect the southerly addition to the existing dwelling with a bridge, rather than constructing a detached separate dwelling on the property with access at grade. The lot merger creates the need for the Variance. The appellant argues that there are special circumstances related to restoration of the Lawrence House, considered an architecturally significant building (Modern Architecture style) designed by the architecture firm Morphosis. The appellant notes that the 5 -foot setback on the north side of the Lawrence House cannot be achieved_ without demolition of a significant portion of the house. In order - to complete the addition to the south, a Variance must be granted that allows the setback on the north side of the building to remain at 3 feet (actually 2'10" based on the survey). A Variance is not intended to be a grant of a special privilege, but a means to address unique conditions, while ensuring that there is parity with surrounding properties. In order to grant a Variance, the City Council, must make the following findings: 1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, limited to the physical conditions applicable to the property involved 2. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question. 3. The granting of the Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. 4. The Variance is consistent with the General Plan. Discussion of findings: Finding 1: The subject lots are typical of surrounding properties, and do not contain any unique physical conditions that might be considered extraordinary or exceptional. They are two 30 -foot wide lots, which is the prevailing width of lots along Hermosa Avenue. Therefore the standard side yard for all lots in this situation is 3 feet. What is unusual, however, is that when these lots are combined the side yard requirement increases, since a 60 -foot wide lot requires a 5 -foot side yard, even though the circumstances of the surrounding lot and development pattern do not change. Application of this 5 - foot side yard to an existing condition that is otherwise consistent with prevailing side yard requirements would seem to be an extraordinary and exceptional circumstance, and creates an unnecessary hardship for this applicant, since approximately 51 feet of the existing home must be removed. One of the reasons for basing the size of the side yard on the lot width, is to create consistency with the prevailing neighborhood lot pattern, and arguably the proposed merger of lots maintains the prevailing lot pattern in the neighborhood. Finding 2: The owner wishes to exercise a property right to expand an existing single-family home to take advantage of the purchase of an adjacent property. While the Variance is necessary for the addition to be connected as proposed by the applicant, there are other options available to exercise the property right to construct an addition and achieve parity with the neighborhood that would not require a Variance. For example, the applicant could develop a "detached" new single-family home for a guest 2 home, complying with the IPack requirements between the two lots, wi access between the main dwelling and the "guest" house only on the ground. In connection with the parity issue, the Council, however, may want to consider the other unique circumstances that surround this case relating to the historical and architectural significance of the property, and the fact that the subject of the Variance is limited to the right to maintain a 3 -foot side yard (which is otherwise typical of side yards on other properties with 30 -foot lots.) Finding 3: The project will not likely be materially detrimental to property improvements in the vicinity and zone since the project complies with all other requirements of the Zoning Code, and does not involve a major expansion. In fact, the proposed expansion is substantially less in density, scale, and building height than if a new home were proposed for the adjacent property. Further, parking will be increased well in excess of the standard requirement for a single-family dwelling and no on -street parking will be lost. Finding 4: Plan. The project is otherwise in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and the General Staff recommends if the Variance is granted that a condition of approval be included to require that the roof plans and elevations for the project be revised to comply with the 30 -foot height limit. Concur: Blumenfeld, Dire or Community De elopment Department Stephen City Manager Attachments 1. Planning Commission Resolution and Minutes 2. Correspondence 3. Location Map 4. Zoning Analysis 5. Photographs 3 Ken Robertson Senior Planner 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 04-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUESTED VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 3 -FOOT SIDE YARD RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 5 -FEET FOR A MERGED LOT AT 3410 HERMOSA AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK 101, SHAKESPEARE TRACT The Planning Commission does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by LaSalle Bank owner of the property located at 3410 Hermosa Avenue and 111 34th Street, seeking a Variance to allow two existing lots to merged while maintaining a 3 -foot side yard rather than the required 5 -feet for the merged lots. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for a Variance on September 21, 2004, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. Based on the evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The three-story home at 3410 Hermosa Avenue was constructed in 1982, in conformance with the 3 -foot side yard requirements for a 30 -foot wide lot. 2. The Variance is needed because the applicant is proposing to merge two existing 30 -foot wide lots together, and maintain the existing dwelling with its current 3 -foot north side yard. The merger of the two lots increases the side yard requirement from 3 feet to 5 feet, as the side yard requirement is 10% of lot width, up to a maximum required 5 -feet. 3. The project also includes demolishing the existing dwelling at 111 34th Street, and constructing an addition to the existing dwelling at 3410 Hermosa Avenue extending south over the former 111 34th Street property. 4. The addition includes a guest room, terrace, pool and additional garage parking. The proposed addition is in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, and consists of less than 50% increase in valuation. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Variance: 1. The owner wishes to exercise a property right to expand an existing single-family home to take advantage of the purchase of an adjacent property. While the Variance is necessary for this dwelling addition to be connected as proposed by the applicant, there are other options available to the applicant to exercise their property right that would not require a Variance. For example, the applicant could develop a "detached" new single-family home to serve as a guest home, honoring the setback requirements between the two lots, with access only on the ground. Therefore the . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • Variance is not necessary to exercise a substantial property right, which is one of the four required findings for approval of a Variance. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, and since the Planning Commission cannot make all 4 required finding as required by Section 17.54.020 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission hereby denies the requested Variance. VOTE: AYES: Allen, Koenig, Pizer NOES: Hoffman, Perrotti ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 04-31 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of August 17, 2004. 7 G am Perrotti, Chairman Date F:\B95\CD\PC\2004\09-21-04\varreso3410.doc S Sol Blumenfel retary NOES: AB ' AIN: ABSE None None None 10. CO 4-16/PDP 04-17 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Developme9t' Plan and Vesting entative Parcel Map No. 061452 for a three -unit condo thium at 445 Manhatta l • venue. Staff Recommended Ac n: To continue to September 21, 2004 meeting. Director Blumenfeld stated th the applicants are requesting to co nue this matter in order to allow more time to make corrects s to the plans. Chairman Perrotti opened the public h- : •ng. Kevin Souza, 501 Manhattan Avenue, note down; addressed his concern with parking limi noise, and migrating dirt/debris from the project. be constructed during construction and that the s conce with another beach cottage being torn ion during the construction phase, construction e requested that a temporary retaining wall wet down during grading activities. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, se 04-16/PDP 04-17 -- Conditional Use Parcel Map No. 061452 for a three - carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: RECESS AN Allen, Hof None None None nded by Vice- rmit, Precise Develo condominium at 445 airman Pizer, to CONTINUE CON ent Plan and Vesting Tentative attan Avenue. The motion , Koenig, Pizer, Perrotti CONVENE Chairm. 'errotti recessed the meeting at 9:00 P.M. and reconvened the meeting at 9:07 P. 11. VAR 04-3 — Variance to allow a three-foot side yard rather than the required five feet at 111 34th Street and 3410 Hermosa Avenue. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. Director Blumenfeld advised that this three-story home was constructed in 1982; stated that the building is currently nonconforming to the 30 -foot height limit and current parking setback requirement since the existing setback is 11.5 feet as opposed to 17 feet, as required under the code; noted that these nonconforming conditions are not proposed to change with the improvements; and explained that the variance is necessary because the applicant is proposing to merge the two existing 30 -foot wide lots together, which would now require a 5 -foot side yard requirement — pointing out that this side yard condition is not proposed to increase. He advised G Planning Commission Minutes August 17, 2004 RESOLUTION NO. 04-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUESTED VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 3 -FOOT SIDE YARD RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 5 -FEET FOR A MERGED LOT AT 3410 HERMOSA AVENUE, I ' ALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK 101, SHAKESPE • ' TRACT The Planning C. ission does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An app cation was filed by LaSalle Bank owner of the pro . -rty located at 3410 Hermosa Avenue and 111 3' Street, seeking a Variance to allow two exist' • : lots to merged while maintaining a 3 -foot side yarather than the required 5 -feet for the merg- ' lots. Section 2. The Planning ommission conducted a duly noti the application for a Variance on eptember 21, 2004, at whic written and oral, was presented to an• considered by the Plannin public hearing to consider testimony and evidence, both ommission. Section 3. Based on the evidenc: received at the pu• is hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The three-story home at 3410 Hermos. • ven was constructed in 1982, in conformance with the 3 -foot side yard requirements for a 30-f• de lot. 2. The Variance is needed because the app 'can. is proposing to merge two existing 30 -foot wide lots together, and maintain the existing d ening th its current 3 -foot north side yard. The merger of the two lots increases the side yar. equiremen . om 3 feet to 5 feet, as the side yard requirement is 10% of lot width, up to a m.. mum requir- . 5 -feet. 3. The project also includes demishing the existing dw: ling at 111 34th Street, and constructing an addition to the existin: dwelling at 3410 Hermosa Avenue extending south over the former 111 34th Street property. 4. The addition includes a est room, terrace, pool and additio :1 garage parking. The proposed addition is in compli.. ce with the Zoning Ordinance, and co sts of less than 50% increase in valuation. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Plannin following findings pertag to the application for a Variance: ssion makes the 1. The owner hes to exercise a property right to expand an existing single- .. 'ly home to take advantage of - purchase of an adjacent property. While the Variance is necess. for this dwelling addition o be connected as proposed by the applicant, there are other options a ' . "'able to the applicant to - ercise their property right that would not require a Variance. For examp : the applicant coul ' develop a "detached" new single-family home to serve as a guest home, hono the setback requirements between the two lots, with access only on the ground. Therefore the g ired all 4 inning he it that the applicant is also proposing to demolish the existing dwelling at 111 34th Street, proposing to construct an addition to the existing dwelling at 3410 Hermosa Avenue; and stated that the addition will create one single-family home over the two lots. Director Blumenfeld noted that the proposed merger creates the need for a variance and that the lot merger is needed to accommodate the applicants' plan to connect the southerly expansion to the existing dwelling for a guest room rather than constructing a detached separate dwelling on the property. He advised that the applicants are attempting to restore what they consider to be a historically and architecturally significant building. Director Blumenfeld stated that the applicant argues the required 5 -foot setback on the north side of the existing Lawrence House, which was designed by a noted architect, cannot be achieved without demolition of the existing house; stated that the setback is not the result of the modification to -the -Lawrence House on the side in question, but is due to the proposed expansion to the south and the merging of the two lots. He commented on the meeting of the four primary findings for a variance, as noted in staff report 1) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, limited to the physical conditions applicable to the property involved; 2) the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question; 3) the granting of the Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and 4) the Variance is consistent with the General Plan. With respect to Finding No. 1, Director Blumenfeld stated that the subject lots in their current configuration are fairly typical of surrounding properties and that they do not contain any unique physical conditions; that they are two 30 -foot wide lots, and the prevailing lot width in the area is 30 feet; therefore, he stated that the standard yard for all lots in this situation is 3 feet. He pointed out that what's unusual in this case is that when the two lots are combined, the side yard requirement increases; since the lot will now be 60 feet wide, he indicated that the new side yard requirement for the lot is 5 feet; that application of the 5 -foot side yard requirement to the existing condition is inconsistent with prevailing side yard requirements in the area and would seem to be extraordinary and exceptional; and that this arguably creates an unnecessary hardship for this property. With respect to Finding No. 2, Director Blumenfeld stated that the owner wishes to exercise a property right to expand an existing single-family home to take advantage of the purchase of an adjacent property; and while the variance is necessary for this dwelling addition to be connected, as proposed by the applicant, he stated that there are other options available to the applicants to exercise their property right that would not require a variance, such as developing a detached single-family home. He pointed out that the Commission may wish to consider the unique circumstances that surround this case relating to the historical conditions of the property and the fact that the subject variance is limited to the right to maintain a 3 -foot side yard, which is typical of side yards on other properties in the area characterized by 30 -foot lots. With respect to Finding Nos. 3 and 4, Director Blumenfeld stated that the project will not be materially detrimental to property improvements in the area; and, in fact, it's unique in that one building will be developed where conceivably two separate buildings can be developed; and Planning Commission Minutes 7 August 17, 2004 concluded that the project is otherwise in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. Commissioner Hoffman stated that this is a nonconforming remodel at its most basic element; that one could create a condition of approval that this project, as configured, shall remain one dwelling and that the lot shall not be unmerged. He questioned the possibility of future expansion on this property. Director Blumenfeld explained that the valuation is based on the existing building versus the proposed project, that it's a cumulative calculation. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing. Kevin Dailey, project architect, provided the Commission with additional drawings to reflect the overall scale of the development; stated that staff report was comprehensively written; explained that one of the reasons for developing this project was to provide the existing house with some outdoor space; and stated that the proposed project will increase the neighbors' views, will increase air circulation in this area of the block; and he pointed out that this is a low density project. Chairman Perrotti asked for input on the exterior use of the stainless steel., In response, Mr. Dailey stated that the zinc coated stainless steel will quickly oxidize to a pale color. Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. Commissioner Hoffman expressed his belief that the applicants have created an extraordinary situation given the combination of the two lots; stated that it is a reasonable expectation of anyone that an existing home would not be torn down so that one might acquire an additional lot; and that the reasonable expectation would be that an existing home, were someone to purchase the adjacent property, would be able to remain with the existing footprint; and stated that he could make Finding No. 1. Vice -Chairman Pizer stated that he is not able to make Finding Nos. 1 and 2 because there are other options available to exercise their property rights. Commissioner Koenig stated that he is able to make Finding No. 1, but that he is not able to make Finding No. 2, expressing his belief that there are other options available. Commissioner Allen noted his concurrence with Vice -Chairman Pizer's and Commissioner Koenig's comments. Chairman Perrotti stated that the circumstances are unique, noting that this situation does not often happen in Hermosa Beach where one has two separate lots becoming merged; and he noted his support in making all four findings. He stated that this is an opportunity for the City to 8 Planning Commission Minutes August 17, 2004 • approve something that's not only unique, but also increases open space and air circulation, and decreased density. MOTION by Vice -Chairman Pizer, seconded by Commissioner Koenig, to DENY VAR 04-3 -- Variance to allow a three-foot side yard rather than the required five feet at 111 34th Street and 3410 Hermosa Avenue. The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Allen, Koenig, Pizer Hoffman, Perrotti None None CON 04-17/PDP 04-18 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan : nd Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 061822 for a two -unit condominium at 8 15th treet. Staff Reco ended Action: To continue to September 21, 2004 meeting. Director Blumen noted the applicant's request for a continuance. Chairman Perrotti open the public hearing. MOTION by Commissione offinan, seconded by Commissio CON 04-17/PDP 04-18 -- Co itional Use Permit, Precise Tentative Parcel Map No. 061822 . • r a two -unit condomini carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Allen, Hoffman, Koenig, P None None None tti, Pizer r Koenig, to CONTINUE velopment Plan and Vesting at 85 15th Street. The motion 13. Text amendment corrections to : ections 17.4' .190 -- Off -Street Parking Location and 17.28.020 -- M-1 Permitte ' se List. Staff Recommended Action: To re- ommend approval of said text endment corrections. Director Blumenfeld explaine . that it is necessary to make corrections t • hese code sections due to errors made during the ext amendment process; in the course of m..'ng a change to the Parking Ordinance and t• the M-1 Permitted Use List, he explained that there ere some clerical errors made; advised at changes to the Parking Ordinance were approved thallowed non - required parking to • e permitted as an option for offsite parking; noted that Co it had also considered, and ejected, adding leased parking as an option for providing requireparking offsite; and th• direction by Council was not carried forward in the Ordinance. He no -d that the current ode includes the option for leased parking, along with other changes that ere approved by Council in that Ordinance, and that it incorrectly shows storage and ministorage 9 Planning Commission Minutes August 17, 2004 • • STEVE KAPLAN ATTORNEY AT LAW October 20, 2004 City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Appeal of Variance 04-3 3410 Hermosa Avenue and 111 34th Street Members of the City Council: 6+. ei tip ;' 7, TA OCT 2 fl 20O4 COM. DEV. DEPT The undersigned represents the owner of the above captioned property. This letter is written with reference to the appeal of the Planning Commission's action of August 17th and in support of my client's variance request. By reason of the Variance Application Narrative filed (7/21/04) by project architects Daly Genik; the discussion of findings contained in the Planning Department's staff report (dated 8/10/04); and the 9/9/04 letter submitted by The Katherman Company, more than adequate findings have been presented in order for the City Council to support the subject side yard variance filing. A majority of the Planning Commission, however, could not find a reason for making the finding that exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the subject property thereby justifying the granting of the variance. I disagree with the Commission's decision and detail below a different perspective from which to evaluate the matter before you. In addition to the findings offered in the various correspondence and reports detailed above, a significant and compelling reason exists to support our variance filing. Although planning policy makers are always cautious in granting variances that set a precedent, in the instant matter, the granting of the requested variance is good public policy and would set a precedent that, if emulated by others, would be a benefit to the immediate neighborhood and to the City of Hermosa Beach. The approval of the requested variance, and the development of the proposed guest quarters, pool and garden areas and additional parking, would result in the below listed benefits: • The proposed addition is smaller in scale than allowed by code and results in a much lower build -out density than is otherwise possible in the surrounding neighborhood. 1219 MORNINGSIDE DRIVE SUITE 212 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 PHONE (310) 802.1230 FAx (310) 802.0060 E-MAIL SIKREATTY@AOL.COM /o • • City Council October 20, 2004 Page 2 • The reduced scale and bulk of the proposed project will afford and preserve better ocean views and light/air circulation for project neighbors and allow for more landscaped and open space area at the corner of Hermosa Avenue and 34th Street. • The project includes one garage space and two guest parking spaces, thus substantially reducing the need for on -street parking. I submit to the members of Council that approving the subject variance request is the type of precedent that should be put forth and supported by the City Council in order to promote the city-wide benefits outlined above. Accordingly, request is hereby made for the City Council to reverse the decision of the Planning Commission and to approve Variance 04-3. Respectfully sub St aplan cc: Kevin Daly, Daly Genik Architects Rob Katherman, The Katherman Company Virginia P. Croudace, Croudace & Dietrich I/ The Kath m ttrn Co. October 19, 2004 City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 rICCEDVED OCT 2 r 2004 COM. DEV. DEPT, Subject: Appeal of Variance 04-3 denial - 3410 Hermosa Ave. (and 111 34th St.) To the honorable members of the Hermosa Beach City Council: On behalf of the Harris family we walked the immediate neighborhood to meet with the Harris' neighbors and discuss the Harris' request that the City Council grant a yard Variance to allow the non -conforming 3 -foot setback to remain after the merger of the two 30 -foot wide lots to accommodate the construction of an additional guest room / children's bedroom, an outdoor play area, and a new one -car garage. All of the neighbors we spoke with were supportive of the Harris family's plans to add the additional bedroom. Most expressed support for the rights of the property owner, for lower density development, and for improved parking conditions. Many signers also indicated no strong feelings about the issue. The following table shows the addresses of the neighbors who signed the petition. :Street Address 1# Signed :34th Street :121 34th Street 1 1123 34th Street I 2 125 34th Street 1 133C 34th Street :144 34th Street :122 34th Street :110 34th Street Hermosa Ave :3414 Hermosa Ave :3418 Hermosa Ave Totals 13430 Hermosa Ave 1 p411-1/2 Hermosa Ave 2 1 Several residents were not home during our visits. At these homes, we left letters explaining the purpose of our visit and invited them to contact us. 1 1218 El Prado Avenue, Suite 128 - Torrance, CA 90501 Phone: (310) 618-1999 - Fax: (310) 618-3745 Z Page 2 The maps depicted in the following figures show the location of the neighbors we visited. Figure 1 /3 6 Page 3 A copy of the petition and signatures collected is attached. We hope that the Council will find that the findings outlined in our letter dated September 9, 2004 and the show of support from the Harris' neighbors wholly satisfactory in granting Variance 04-3. Respectfully, • Neighborhood Petition OCT 2 r 2004 COM. DEV. DEPT. We, the undersigned, are neighbors of 3410 Hermosa Avenue and 111 34th Street properties. We have reviewed the plans for the 700 square foot guest bedroom addition, which will be located on the corner lot next to the existing home. The connection between the existing home and the new bedroom and bath will require the 2 lots to be merged into one lot. We further understand that this new double lot will require a 5 -foot side yard setback for the northerly side of the existing home rather than the existing 3 -foot setback, which is the normal side yard in the neighborhood. Accordingly, the retention of the existing home will require a minor yard variance. The new guest room will observe the new 5 -foot side yard requirement along 11t Street. We believe that the project will benefit -the neighborhood by reducing the intensity of development and reducing the need for on street parking, while preserving the views and character of the neighborhood. We therefore support the Variance (04-3) and urge the City Council to allow the Harris family to build the guest room and keep the north side yard as it exists. Date Name Address Signature 34717LL i74 -7-g 1� '7q14.3 ttitA DA CO-terrroirt v`b i .r 9 - Z6 oil 6s67►����.� r� • • Neighborhood Petition We, the undersigned, are neighbors of 3410 Hermosa Avenue and 111 34th Street properties. We have reviewed the plans for the 700 square foot guest bedroom addition, which will be located on the corner lot next to the existing home. The connection between the existing home and the new bedroom and bath will require the 2 lots to be merged into one lot. We further understand that this new double lot will require a 5 -foot side yard setbabk for the northerly side of the existing home rather than the existing 3 -foot setback, which is the normal side yard in the neighborhood. Accordingly, the retention of the existing home will require a minor yard variance. The new guest room will observe the new 5 -foot side yard requirement along l 1th Street. We believe that the project will benefit the neighborhood by reducing the intensity of development and reducing the need for on street parking, while preserving the views and character. of the neighborhood. We therefore support the Variance (04-3) and urge the City Council to allow the Harris family to build the guest room and keep the north side yard as it exists. Date 041c4 (001/. Name 1),441)0 5414d✓L441 Address Signature 3LI I( z -�,E S 44.4) Frt.if F L4(d1S al 34e J : (( The Katherman Company 1218 El Prado Avenue, Suite 128 — Torrance; CA 90501 Telephone: (310) 618-1999 — Fax: (310) 618-3745 — email: rob@katherco.com September 15, 2004 City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RECEIVED SEP 2 1 2004 COM. DEV. DEPT. Subject: Appeal of Variance 04-3 denial - 3410 Hermosa Ave. (and 111 34th St.) To the honorable members of the Hermosa Beach City Council: On behalf of the Harris family we are submitting this letter appealing the planning commission's denial of the Variance to maintain an existing 3 -foot side yard rather than the required 5 -feet for a merged lot. The Harris family purchased their 2 -bedroom home at 3410 Hermosa Avenue two years ago. The home is an early noteworthy project known as the Lawrence House, designed by Thom Mayne of the renowned Los Angeles -based architecture firm Morphosis. It was built in 1983 in conformance with the requirements at the time. The existing home is a 2 -bedroom single family home; the Harris family includes two children who are now old enough to need separate bedrooms. The Harris family has spent substantial time and money restoring the Lawrence House, and finding another, larger home is not an option due to the disruption it would cause the family and particularly the children. In order to add an additional bedroom, the Harris family purchased the adjacent lot this year (111 34th St.), on which they hoped to add a guest room / children's bedroom, an outdoor play area, and a new one - car garage. However, adding directly to the existing Lawrence House would require that the new construction cross the property line that separates the two lots. As a consequence, the proposed addition to the south requires the merging of the two 30 -foot wide lots to make a single lot. The reconfigured property is subject to a larger, 5 -foot side yard setback on the north side of the existing Lawrence House, even though no footprint modification of the existing structure is proposed. Bringing the existing structure into compliance would require demolition of the historically important structure. The city code (17.52. 030) governing non -conforming buildings requires that "expansions" (emphasis added) must conform to current codes. Since the proposed addition conforms to current codes and does not involve a remodel or expansion of the existing structure, we request /7 that the City Council grant the yard Variance to allow a non -conforming 3 -foot setback to remain on the Lawrence House lot after the merger of the two 30 -foot wide lots'. To grant a Variance, the following findings must be made: Finding 1. Exceptional circumstances applicable to the property involved; The subject lots in their current configuration are 30 -foot wide lots, which is the prevailing width of lots along Hermosa Avenue. The standard side yard for these lots is 31 feet. However, when these lots are combined the side yard requirement increases to 5 -feet, even though the circumstances of the surrounding lot and development pattern do not change. Application of this 5 -foot side yard to an existing condition that is otherwise consistent with prevailing side yard requirements would create an unnecessary hardship for the Harris family. One of the reasons for the side yard standard is _tocreateconsistency within a neighborhood that has a prevailing lot pattern, and the proposed merger of parcels does not change the prevailing pattern. The merging of lots and building of an addition to an existing house, rather than the tearing down of an existing house and building of a new house, is an exceptional circumstance. If a new house were to be built on the merged 60 -foot wide lot, a 5 -foot side yard would be entirely reasonable. It should be noted that the proposed new addition meets all zoning requirements, including the S - foot side yard requirement at the south property line. Finding 2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the vicinity of the subject property; In the last five years, similar variances have been granted to other properties in Hermosa Beach: • Var. 99-9: A variance was granted to allow an expansion of greater than 50% (up to 100%) of a non -conforming building with a side yard of only 3.2 feet (4 feet is the requirement). • Var. 01-3: A variance was granted to allow a 750 square foot 20 story addition to a house with only 1 parking space and a side yard setback of less than 3 feet. • Var. 99-3: A variance was granted to allow new construction with a 3 foot rear yard rather than the required 5 feet and a garage with a less than code; depth due to the irregularity of the lot size. • Var. 99-2: A variance was granted to maintain and expand an existing nonconforming sideyard of 2.6 feet rather than the required 10% of lot width due to the irregularity of the lot shape as well as the non -parallel alignment of the existing structure and the property lines. A varying setback range was noted by a representative of the applicant. It is worth noting that in many of these examples, the need for the Variance arose from new construction or other expansion activities. However, in the case of the Harris home, there is no new construction or remodeling of the existing structure, but rather the new construction is being done as an additional structure primarily on the newly purchased lot with an above ground passageway connecting the existing home to the new bedroom and bathroom, and planned at a significantly lower square foot density than allowed under regulations. l8 Furthermore, as in Var. 99-2, the north face of the existing Lawrence House features a varying setback range due to its irregular shape and non -parallel orientation to the boundary. Only 26 feet of the first story of the house would encroach 2 -feet into the 5 -foot setback along with a minor additional length of the 2 -foot encroachment on the second story of the house. The balance of the existing house is currently 5 feet or more from the north property line. Finding 3. That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; Planning staff have found that the project will not likely be materially detrimental to property improvements in the vicinity and zone since the project complies with all other requirements of the Zoning Code, and does not involve a major expansion. In fact, the proposed expansion is substantially less than if a new home at full legal size development were proposed for the__.__ adjacent property. Further, parking will be increased well in excess of the standard requirement for a single-family dwelling and no on -street parking will be lost. In fact, the addition includes one garage space, and two guest parking spaces, thus reducing the need for on -street parking substantially. Finding 4. That the granting of the variance will not conflict with the provisions of, or be detrimental to, the general plan. The project is otherwise in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. Finally, given the staff findings that the proposed addition would not change the prevailing lot pattern or be materially detrimental to other property owners in the neighborhood, we suggest that the project fully complies with the spirit and intention of the setback requirements, if not the letter of the requirements, and therefore should be given full consideration for a Variance. Respectfully, Rob Katherman r9 � x SSA AVE. cP:1soo4181 _ 3 HERMOSA 411k ZONING CHECK LIST f (rtcA Itt39',^l / ADDRESS 10 l� eArw1(1Sa. ANC A — ZONE .17---_ -- 3 OWNER/ARCHITECT 7x1 H<<GENERAL PLAN i-1- 1) (.f.- `+,- vr 1-) PROJECT TYPE 5v- ah v tov\ DATE S I �I l 04 ITEMS CHECKED NEED CORRECTION 1) ALLOWABLE DENSITY u''"h. EXISTING DENSITY 2- PROPOSED 1 ' "`I— f' +.. Int q� of _X 2) ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT 3o EXISTING �3d PROPOSED 3d cP3• wj r.sa.....,1►c S ... MAXIMUM HEIGHT INFORMATION PROPERLY SHOWN ON ROOF PLAN/ELEVATIONS: A 1' ' 1 COASTAL ZONE YES NO *IF YES, A COASTAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. PC ELEVATIONS No CRITICAL POINT MAX AND PROPOSED 1.0 DISTANCES TO C.P.'S ►+ a � c..c 3) NO. OF STORIES EXISTING 3 4) MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE (&7i EXISTING PROP ED /X. .5.-0 5) 6) PROPOSED Z Nov► REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK Io iEXISTIN 7 PROPOSED 10 4". 14-44A) r / REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK, 1ST FL. 3 2ND FL I A EXISTING 3' 3 ► PROPOSED S' 1,0,41 t REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK S EXIST MULTIPLE ROW DWELLINGS YES NO X REQUIRED SIDE -YARD EXISTING & S PROPOSED 3 PROPOSED 8) REQUIRED PARKING SPACES STANDARD 2- GUEST EXISTING SPACES STANDARD 2 GUEST v PROPOSED SPACES STANDARD GUEST Z- & S' 9) PARKING SPACES MINIMUM SIZ 8 X200 1 �v s- x�✓ 1 ,a Zc>>v STANDARD INSIDE GARAGE 17 (-)EXISTING 14q.• " PROPOSED v GUEST SPACE(S) OUTSIDE Y> X 17 EXISTING 4\ ��`s� PROPOSED Z 10) GARAGE OR PARKING SETBACK REQUIRED 11 EXISTING VZ PROPOSED I1 t t" 1 ► 11) MIN. GARAGE DOOR/CEILING CLEARANCE 7 EXISTING PROPOSED 1 12) TURNING AREA REQUIRED Z3 EXISTING PROPOSED 2 13) DRIVEWAY: I REQUIRED WIDTH 9 EXISTING PROPOSED 1 1 MAXIMUM SLOPE I 2,41 EXISTING PROPOSED MINIMUM CLEARANCE 7 r EXISTING PROPOSED S f-4- 2( r I 14) REQUIRED USABLE PEN SPACE 3o EXISTING. �ROPOSED 3 ae -1--I- MINIMUM DIMENSION REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED MAXIMUM COVERAGE ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED MINIMUM ADJACENT TO PRIMARY LIVING AREA (R-2, R-3 OR R-1 SMALL LOT) OR MINIMUM REQUIRED ON GRADE (R-1 & R -1A) oo EXISTING PROPOSED 160 ic-f" 15) MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS: N- MAIN BUILDINGS EXISTING PROPOSED MAIN BUILDING AND ACCESSORY EXISTING PROPOSED 16) ARCHITECTURAL ENCROACHMENTS INTO REQUIRED YARDS: N MINIMUM EAVE SETBACK EXISTING PROPOSED MINIMUM BAY WINDOW SETBACK EXISTING (PROPOSED MINIMUM COLUMNS/CHASES ETC. SETBACK EXISTING I PROPOSED MINIMUM FIREPLACE SETBACK EXISTING PROPOSED 17) MAXIMUM STAIRWAY/BALCONY FRONT SETBACK ENCROACHMENT r' EXISTING PROPOSED 18) STAIRWAY IN SIDEYARD: ABOVE 1ST LEVEL YES NO X Ki EXTEND IN BOTH DIRECTIONS YES MAXIMUM HEIGHT EXISTING PROPOSED 19) PERIMETER WALLS/FENCES --LOT TYPE: Co rV1Pi1� INTERIOR CORNER K REVERSED CORNER i FRONT HEIGHT MAXIMUM q2 r EXISTING PROPOSED Z f I o..te„ V'' cAD--L SIDE HEIGHT MAXIMUM ‘1Z EXISTING PROPOSED -IVACO S Sof 64`G- S r REAR HEIGHT MAXIMUM to, EXISTING PROPOSED t0 20) CHIMNEY/VENTS PROJECTION ABOVE HEIGHT LIMIT Web i(E+^J FLAT ROOF SLOPED ROOF MAXIMUM PROJECTION ABOVE ROOF EXISTING PROPOSED CHIMNEY BULK: MAX DIMENSION EXISTING PROPOSED 21) SOUND TRANSMISSION INSULATION BETWEEN WALLS (CONDOMINIUMS) N et MIN. S.T.C. RATING BETWEEN FLOORS PROPOSED MIN. S.T.C. RATING BETWEEN COMMON WALLS PROPOSED NO PLUMBING FIXTURES IN COMMON WALLS Z.Z 22) NONCONFORMING REMODEL STRUCTURE: (PARKINGMINIMUM SPACE SIZE: 8'/: FT. W x 18 FT. D) MAX. EXPANSION (PERCENTAGE VALUATION) BY RIGHT 5 0 Vo PROPOSED S- '3/0 ONE PARKING SPACE PER DWELLING UNIT MAX. EXPANSION PROPOSED LESS THAN 1 PARKING SPACE PER UNIT MAX. EXPANSION PROPOSED MAXIMUM DEMOLITION 3o'iv PROPOSED >%t,1�-51.- 23) REVIEW CARD FILE AND MASTER FILE OPEN PERMITS YES NO k CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTION PENDING YES NO ) OPEN COMPLAINTS YES NO PREVIOUS ADDITION TO NONCONFORMING REMODEL NO ? YES IF YES, % 24) CORNER VISION CLEARANCE YES NO 25) SCREENED TRASH FACILITY YES NOf 5 (nc i ✓+ 26) SIGNED DOCUMENTS CONNECTED WITH DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL h -A— NEEDED RECEIVED ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS AFFIDAVIT NOTICES OF PENDING CONSTRUCTION AFFIDAVIT CC & R'S FOR RECORDATION ASSUMPTION OF RISK IF SUMP PUMP 27) HISTORIC LANDMARK OR RESOURCE ? .28) NOMINATED DESIGNATED CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS *IF A COASTAL APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT IS REQUIRED, 2 SETS OF CONCEPTUAL PLANS AND A COASTAL PERMIT APPLICATION NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AFTER ZONE CHECK APPROVAL. CONTACT PLANNING STAFF FOR INFORMATION (310) 318-0242. 29) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS F:\B95\CD\zonecheck2003.doc revised 3/04 Z3 3410 Hermosa Avenue R-1 height calculation template -, USE FOR R-1 ZONE ONLY Address: 3410 Hermosa Av i 08/011/2004 Elev. Pt. A 100.62 Elev. Pt. B 112.59 Length A -B 85 Length A-AB145 Elev. AB': Elev. Pt. C 100.17 Elev. Pt. D 111.48 Length C -D 85 Length C -CD' 14.5 . _ . Elev.CD': Length AB' -CD' 60, Length AU-CP1 14.5' 102.6619412Elev. 102 0993529 Elev. Pt. A 100.62 Elev. Pt. B 112.59 Length A -B 85' ' Length A -AB' 22.6 AB': 103.788529 Elev. Pt. C 100.17- Elev. Pt. D 111.48 Length C -D 85 Length C -CD' 22.5 Elev.CD': Length AB' -CD' 60 103.163824 _. . Length AB'-CP1 25 'Elev. CP1: 102.5259824 Elev. CP1: 103.528235 Height Limit 30 Height Limit 30 L Max. Hgt. @ CP1: , 132.5259824, Max. Hgt. @ CP2: I 133.528235 I 1 Elev. Pt. A 100.62, Elev. Pt. B112.59, ' --,-- Length A -B 851 Length A -AB' 30.5' Elev. AB': Elev. Pt. C 100.171 Elev. Pt. D 111.481 Length C -D 85 104.9151176 Length C -CD' , 30.51 ' ,Elev.CD': 104.2282941 . _. Length AB' -CD' 60. Length AB'-CP1 26.51 r - Bev. CP1: ;I64.6117706 , Height Limit30, Max. Hgt. @ CP3: 134.6117706: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT NONCONFORMING/UNDERGROUNDING VALUATION WORKSHEET ADDRESS 3 410 4eirM c,S cL EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR AREAS LIVABLE 3 $0 Ce x GARAGE 3(v x Z7 /6 DATE 8' id/ J _ /A 4,13 DECKS Z47 v 2 - EXISTING VALUE 50% OF EXISTING VALUE 413'7I�1 PROPOSED PROJECT ADDED FLOOR AREAS LIVABLE ( c) X //U _ 15-3005 GARAGE 440 X 29 _ ) 2.. 3 c7 DECKS 12 `i 0 X I _ �. ZI Co 0 0 REMODELED AREA LIVABLE X " _ GARAGE X = DECKS X TOTAL VALUE 1 01 2� PERCENTAGE OF VALUE OF PROJECT TO EXISTING BUILDING 1 Zc— % UNDERGROUND UTILITIES REQUIRED YES/NO * ANY GARAGE EXPANSION FOR VEHICLE PARKING SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN ALLOWABLE EXPANSION / REMODELING (SEC. 13-3(B) & 13-7(B)) 11134th Street (to be demolished) Mau.) 136140L IS wi Et, A • October 19, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council • Regular Meeting of October 26, 2004 SAINT PATRICK'S DAY PARADE AND FESTIVAL: SATURDAY, MARCH 12 AND SUNDAY, MARCH 13, 2005 Recommendation The Parks, Recreation and Community Advisory Commission recommends that City Council: I. Approve the request from the South Bay St. Patrick's Day Weekend Committee (SBSPDC) to hold their annual Saint Patrick's Day Parade and Festival for one day only, March 12, 2005. 2. Approve the event contract (Attachment A) and street closures. 3. Approve fee waiver/funding requests as follows: • $15,000 allocation from the Downtown Enhancement Fund to cover Direct Costs for City services, not to exceed $15,000. • $2,000 from Proposition A Transportation Funds for shuttle bus service from the Mira Costa parking lot to the Festival. • Waiver of indirect City fees: parking fees, banner fees, and amplification sound permit fees. • Billing for Police, Fire and Public Works services at actual hourly cost. • Approval to utilize the City Parking Lot A for a Kiddy Carnival and Petting Zoo; 11th Street between Beach Ave. and Hermosa Ave. for a Food Court, and Parking Lot B between 13`h St. and 13`h Court for operations compound. • Closure of Valley Drive from 8`h St. to Pier Avenue from 7:00 am to 1:00 pm Saturday, March 12`h for parade line up. • Closure of Hermosa Avenue from 13th St. to 8th St. from 10:00 am to 12:30 pm Saturday, March 12`h for the parade. • Closure of 11`h St. from Hermosa Avenue to the parking lot entrance from 7:00 am Saturday, March 12th to 7:00 pm. Sb • • Background On August 8, 2004, staff received a request for a special event permit from the SBSPDC to hold their 11`'' Annual Saint Patrick's Day Parade and Festival. The event consists of a one -day parade and two-day festival featuring vendor booths, carnival, and Food Court. Attachments B -D contain the event outline, budget and site plans. Analysis The parade staging area will be located on Valley Drive from Pier Avenue to 8th Street using: • City Hall Parking Lot, • Valley Drive, • the Greenbelt, and • beyond 8th Street on the Greenbelt Parking Lot. This staging area plan has worked successfully in past years to minimize the impacts of street closures by confining operations to the south side of Pier Avenue. The parade route will begin on Valley Drive at Pier Avenue and will proceed westbound to Hermosa Avenue where it will turn southbound (on the east side of Hermosa Avenue) and end at 8th Street. As a two-day event, staff recommends vendor booths, the kiddy carnival and petting zoo, and the festival be located as follows: • 11 °i Street west of Hermosa Avenue to Beach Drive and Parking Lot A. • Pier Plaza between Hermosa Avenue and the Strand. • Two stages at Pier Plaza — one on the east side of the strand and one near Hermosa Avenue. Since street closures are determined solely by City Council, staff and Commission defer that decision to Council. Observations In order to secure placement of elected officials in parade line-up, staff recommends that all vehicle assignments and sequential order of parade entrants be solidified one (1) week prior to event day. Documentation stating these specific details should be provided to the Community Resources Department by said deadline to alleviate any miscommunications. 2 Fiscal Impact: $15,000 maximum allocation from the Downtown Enhancement Fund $ 2,000 allocation from Proposition A Funds $ 300 Administration Fee deposited into the General Fund Direct costs for Police, Fire, Public Works and Parking Lot rentals to be reimbursed by SBSPDC. Alternatives for Consideration to facilitate reduced impact: A. One day (Saturday only) Parade B. Restrict Festival area to Pier Plaza (11`x' St. remains open) Attachments: A. Event Contract B. Letters of Request C. 2005 Projected Operations Budget and 2004 Operations Budget D. Diagram of Parade Route and Vendor Booths E. Public Works Memo Respectfully Submitted, Concu Lisa Lynn, Supervisor Community Resources Department City Manager 6t . rr 1 Stepn Bu 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONTRACT WITH SOUTH BAY SAINT PATRICK'S DAY COMMITTEE, INC. 1 This contract is entered into on October 26, 2004 at Hermosa Beach, California by and between SOUTH BAY SAINT PATRICK'S DAY COMMITTEE, INC. (SBSPDC) a non-profit organization and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY), with regards to the "SAINT PATRICK'S DAY PARADE" Special Event on March 12-13, 2005. FEES Event administration fee shall be: $300 In addition, direct costs for Police, Fire and Public Works at actual hourly costs. All predetermined fees shall be paid two weeks prior to Event. All unanticipated costs incurred by CITY on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from CITY. CITY shall allocate $15,000 from the Downtown Enhancement Fund for this event. The funds shall be paid to SBSPDC on a reimbursement basis and shall be used first to offset all CITY fees and next to pay for professional event management services. CITY shall allocate $2,000 from Proposition A transportation funds, which shall be used solely for event shuttle bus public transportation. PARADE ROUTE & VENDOR BOOTHS Parade staging area shall be on Valley Drive adjacent to City Hall. Participants will be instructed by SBSPDC to park at the Community Center or other public lots. Busses will be permitted to park at the southeast City Hall lot. The northeast lot shall remain available for library and general public parking. ➢ The Parade route shall begin from City Hall down Pier Avenue to Hermosa Avenue (west -side) south to 8th Street and east to disband. ➢ Festival vendor spaces will be located on Pier Plaza (on the east side of the strand). The Kiddy Carnival and Petting Zoo will be located in Parking Lot A and the Food Court will be on 11`h Street between Beach Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. ➢ Two stages with live entertainment will be on the Pier Plaza (one on the east side of the strand and one near Hermosa Avenue). SECURITY CITY shall provide Officers for the parade route between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on March 12, and Officers for the celebration activities on both days from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. The Chief of Police shall determine the number of officers necessary to ensure event safety and traffic control. CITY shall provide two (2) Fire/Paramedicpersonnel for the event or as many firefighters as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief. All costs of the Officers and Fire/Paramedic personnel shall be assumed by SBSPDC. Responsibility for unarmed event security shall be assumed by SBSPDC. 1 Attachment A PARKING/BARRICADES SBSPDC will post temporary "No Parking" signs 24 hours in advance of the restrictions as required by CITY. CITY requires SBSPDC to provide adequate signage to parking and notice to residents of 7th and 9th Courts regarding street closures. SBSPDC shall provide a shuttle bus service from a major satellite point(s) on the outskirts of or outside of Hermosa Beach. SBSPDC shall provide directional signs and advertisements, which shall be approved in advance by CITY. Temporary No Parking signs will be posted by SBSPDC: 1. Valley Drive from 8th Street to Pier Avenue from 7 AM — 1 PM, Saturday, March 12. 2. Hermosa Avenue from 14th Street to 10th Street: times to be determined. 3. I lth Street from Hermosa Avenue to the parking lot entrance: times to be determined. 4. Any other locations as directed by the City. CLEAN-UP The streets and Plaza shall be cleaned by SBSPDC to meet the conditions as specified by CITY staff. SBSPDC shall be responsible to provide adequate trash receptacles and portable toilets as necessary to accommodate the event. SBSPDC shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside CITY at end of event. INSURANCE SBSPDC shall provide CITY with a certificate of insurance providing liability insurance naming CITY, its officers, employees, and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. SBSPDC agrees to defend, indemnify and hold CITY harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by negligent or wrongful act or omission of the event organizers or its agents, officers and employees, including but not limited to personal injury, bodily injury, death, and property damage. ADVERTISING CITY shall permit three (3) street banners to be posted for the Event. SPECIAL EVENTS CITY shall review all requests for any special events requested as part of said event. CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES CITY staff shall allow SBSPDC the opportunity to sell concession items per certain conditions. All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to the event. MISCELLANEOUS RESPONSIBILITIES OF SOUTH BAY SAINT PATRICK'S DAY COMMITTEE SBSPDC will be required to obtain an amplification permit. SBSPDC will be solely responsible for event management. 2 Attachment A •. SBSPDC shall produce documentation that outlines vehicle assignments for elected officials and sequential order of parade entrants to the Community Resources Department one (1) week prior to event day. SBSPDC will notify all affected residents/merchants about the parade and festival. Hermosa Beach merchants will have first priority to reserve vendor booth space. No food vendors will be allowed on the Pier Plaza. Merchants on lower Pier Avenue will be permitted to display wares and/or create outdoor dining areas for the duration of the event at no charge to the merchants. SBSPDC is responsible to ensure that all relevant Health Department and CITY codes are adhered to. Twenty -foot (20') fire lanes shall be maintained in the booth areas as specified by the Fire Chief. CITY reserves the right to amend booth locations as necessary for emergency access and fire safety purposes. SBSPDC shall be responsible for posting "No Alcohol" signs prohibiting the use of alcohol on lower Pier Avenue. No items will be thrown from the parade entrants to the viewing public. A traffic control plan shall submitted by SBSPDPC at least three (3) weeks prior to the event for approval by the Public Works and Police Departments. Barricades, cones, and related equipment shall be provided and posted by SBSPDC. Detour signs shall be included in parade route areas. SBSPDC will abide by any additional policies or appropriate fees as established by CITY. Event shall be conducted in compliance with CITY Noise Ordinances. Ordinances are on file at the Department of Community Resources. CITY RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION (S) OF SAID CONTRACT. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor Date APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Date SOUTH BAY SAINT PATRICK'S DAY COMMITTEE Director of Operations Date ATTEST City Clerk Date 3 Attachment A Saint Patrick's Day �). Parade and Festival ;7") Hermosa Beach CA Executive Board Jean Cullen Co -Chair . J. Travers Devine Co -Chair • Thomas Hansen -O'Shaughnessy Corporate Clerk Carole Melton Secretary Vincent Schmeltzer Treasurer Tony Sotos Communications Directors John Bowler Gina Cook -Nyman Bonnie Davis Matt Duffy Mike Ludwig Jim Fucile John Grace Steve Kinney Mike McLaughlin Steve Poirier Susan Preston Marie Ryan Amy Scaccianoce Virginia Scaccianoce Colleen Stanovich Chuck Tipton Abel Ybarra Corinne Ybarra nee Rae, • South Bay • St. Patrick's Day Weekend Committee A California Non Profit Corporation IRS E!N 33-0650362 — C1942595 P.O Box 1529 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-1529 (310)374-1365 fax (310)374-4972 w ww. stpatricksday. org August 8, 2004 Honorable Christine Hollander, Chair Parks and Recreation Commission City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach CA 90254 Dear Chairperson Hollander and Members of the Commission: Please find attached a copy of the request to the City Council for a public hearing on the proposal for the 2005 St. Patrick's Day Parade & Festival, our 11th Annual event: Our Committee respectfully requests the Commission to review our requests and support our proposal to the City Council. We will be pleased to attend the Commission meeting to answer any questions any member of the Commission may have. The 2005 events are a mirror image of the 2004 events with only minor changes. Again this year, we are proposing that the Council set aside monies to pay for City fees and actual costs as the Cities Sponsorship donation to the event. This method has worked well for our events the last two years with no City funds actually leaving the City or accruing to our Committee. As is our custom, Qur financial figures from the 2004 events are contained as a part of the package along with our projections for 2005. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Co -Chair Attachment B Saint Patrick's Day ‘o,Aarade and Festival Hermosa Beach CA Executive Board Jean Cullen Co -Chair J. Travers Devine Co -Chair Thomas Hansen -O'Shaughnessy Corporate Clerk Carole Melton Secretary Vincent Schmeltzer Treasurer Tony Sotos Communications Directors John Bowler Gina Cook -Nyman Bonnie Davis Matt Duffy Mike Ludwig Jim Fucile John Grace Steve Kinney Mike McLaughlin Steve Poirier Susan Preston Marie Ryan Amy Scaccianoce Virginia Scaccianoce Colleen Stanovich Chuck Tipton Abel Ybarra Corinne Ybarra nee Rae • • South Bay St. Patrick's Day Weekend Committee A California Non Profit Corporation IRS EIN 33-0650362 P.O Box 1529 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-1529 (310)374-1365 fax (310)374-4972 www.stpatricksday. org September 8, 2004 Honorable Art Yoon, Mayor City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 RE: 2005 St. Patrick's Day Parade & Festival Dear Mayor Yoon and Members of the Council: The St. Patrick's Day & Festival Committee would like to request a public hearing for consideration of the enclosed proposal for our 2005 St. Patrick's Day Parade and Festival. For the third year in a row, the actual Parade and Festival lost money. The success of our organization in working the Chamber of Commerce sponsored Fiesta Beer and Wine Garden provided us with more than enough capital to off set the losses of the events and allow us to continue to promote the St. Patrick's Day events that are so much a labor of love for us. As an -off season event, the Parade draws a large crowd, and the Festival provides reason for those crowds to remain, providing customers for our stores, restaurants and taverns that would not otherwise be present in our downtown on a weekend in March. While it is true that the taverns will always be crowded on St. Patrick's Day weekend that is not true of boutiques, jewelry stores, restaurants and other businesses. Our purpose has always been and continues to be a combination of the celebration of our Irish heritage with a family event and to promote additional business in downtown Hermosa Beach through a major event in the off-season. i • For the second year in a row, we did not receive the financial breakdown of costs from the City. We are operating under the assumption that the monies set aside by the City Council to cover the actual City expenses related to the Parade and Festival were adequate and would again request $15,000 be set aside by the City Council to pay for Police, Fire and Public Works overtime, City fees and loss of revenue from parking lots as the City contribution as a Major Sponsor of the Parade and Festival. We also request $2,000.00 from transportation funds for shuttle service from Mira Costa to the Parade and Festival. We propose that the Parade will continue with the traditional route from City Hall down Pier Avenue to Hermosa Avenue South (on the east side of Hermosa Avenue) to 8th Street and east to disband. Pier Avenue from Manhattan to Beach and Hermosa Avenue from 13th Street to 8th Street would be closed to traffic from 10:00 A.M. to 12:30 P.M. as needed and coordinated by the Hermosa Police Department. Our stage will be placed on Pier Plaza at the Pier head. The Committee will, as usual, encourage all business in Hermosa Beach to participate in the parade. We are requesting the following items for approval: City sponsorship not to exceed $15,000 for City Fees and Services related to the Parade & Festival Parking Fees, Street Banner Fees, Amplification Permit fees and other City Fees, and billing at actual cost for Public Works, Police and Fire Department and Parking lot fees, to be paid out of the City sponsorship monies set aside above. Approval to utilize the City Parking Lot on 11th Street for a Carnival and Petting Zoo and one half of the City Parking Lot on 13th Street for a staging compound. Closure of Valley Drive from 8th Street to Pier Avenue from 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. (for Parade line up) Saturday, March 12th. Closure of Hermosa Avenue from 13th street to 8th street from 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. Saturday March 12th for the Parade Closure of 11th Street from Hermosa Avenue to Beach Drive from 7:00 A.M. Saturday March 12th to 7:00 P.M. Sunday March 13th Approval of expenditures, not to exceed $2,000.00 from the City Transportation fund for shuttle bus service from the Mira Costa Parking Lot to the Festival. • • Event Outline Event: St. Patrick's Day Parade and Festival Purpose: Celebrate St. Patrick, Irish and Irish American culture, and to promote the City and all Hermosa Beach businesses. Date: Saturday, March 12, 2005 for the Parade - Saturday and Sunday March 13, 2004 for the Festival Time: Parade from 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Saturday March 12th and Festival from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. both days. Location: - Under the direction of Conte Productions, the Parade will step off at Valley and Pier Avenue; continue west on Pier Avenue to the west side of Hermosa Avenue where it will turn south and continue to Eighth Street. Vendors: Open to all Hermosa Beach businesses. Irish imports, Arts and crafts booths on Pier Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and the Strand. Cost: Free to the public. Parade Entries free for all non-profit agencies $100.00 - $200.00 for business entries displaying logos and promotions $500.00 for Corporate entries and floats. Festival Vendor space of 10' by 10' for $200.00. Food Court Vendor fee $700.00 Parade: Parade will consist of not more than 125 entries. High School Marching Bands, Bagpipe Bands, VIP's, Clowns, Irish Dancers, etc. Festival: Food: One stage with live Entertainment will be at the Pier Head and will feature performances of Colm Gallagher, the Misty Isle Bagpipe Band and traditional Irish Step Dancers from the Kelly School of Irish Dance. The Kiddy Carnival and Petting Zoo will again be in the Parking lot on 11th Street with the food Court on 11th Street. Participating Hermosa Beach restaurants can have outdoor sidewalk cafe seating, following all City, Health Department and ABC requirements. A limited number of fast food cart vendors will be allowed. Food vendor prices are structured to provide a substantial discount to • Hermosa Beach Restaurants. • • Parking: Large parking signs directing cars to remote parking, will be posted at 14th Street and Pier and at Pier Avenue and Manhattan Avenue. Professional security will be provided to guide customers of the Mermaid and the Beach Hotel, seeking access to Beach Drive. Remote parking and shuttle service will be available and advertised in advance and signs will be posted on Pacific Coast Highway and Pier Avenue; PCH and 8th Street; PCH and Artesia Boulevard. Event Info: An Information booth will be set up on Pier Plaza at Hermosa Avenue and will be staffed throughout the event. Site management during the event will be provided by paid security and volunteer staff. Promotion: The St. Patrick's Committee will promote the event through newspapers, radio and television and in the Irish newspapers and radio programs. The Committee has 2 banners, which will hang across Pacific Coast Highway and/or Aviation Blvd. or Pier Avenue. Insurance: St. Patrick's Day Committee will provide $2 million liability insurance . Cleanliness: The Committee will arrange to have temporary trash receptacles along the parade route as well as at the vendor location. Temporary toilets will be provided. The Committee will hire a maintenance and clean-up crew to pick up trash along the parade route immediately following the parade and clean the vendors' site immediately at the close of the event Saturday and Sunday evenings, normal City street sanitation contractor will be responsible from the close of the event Saturday and Sunday. Traffic Coordinated between Mark Conte Productions and the Hermosa Beach Police Department, the Committee will utilize a combination of professional security officers, volunteers and off duty Police in a ratio acceptable to the HBPD. The St. Patrick's Day Committee hopes that this event will continue to provide wonderful Irish entertainment and an appreciation for Irish culture to the residents of the community, as well as increased sales for our business community, and the promotion of city pride. Sincerely, J. Travers Devine Co -Chair South Bay St. Patrick's Day Weekend Committee Saint Patrick's Day , j Parade and Festival Hermosa Beach CA Executive Board Jean Cullen Co -Chair J. Travers Devine Co -Chair Thomas Hansen -O'Shaughnessy Corporate Clerk Carole Melton Secretary Vincent Schmeltzer Treasurer Tony Sotos Communications Directors John Bowler Gina Cook -Nyman Bonnie Davis Matt Duffy Mike Ludwig Jim Fucile John Grace Steve Kinney Mike McLaughlin Steve Poirier Susan Preston Marie Ryan Amy Scaccianoce Virginia Scaccianoce Colleen Stanovich Chuck Tipton Abel Ybarra Corinne Ybarra nee Rae, • I • South Bay St. Patrick's Day Weekend Committee A California Non Profit Corporation IRS EIN 33-0650362 — C1942595 P.O Box 1529 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-1529 (310)374-1365 fax (310)374-4972 www. stpatricksday. org October 6, 2004 Mayor Art Yoon & Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach Dear Mayor Yoon: The proposal of the St. Patrick's Day Committee for our event will be before you on the Council Agenda October 26th. The Parks and Recreation Commission heard our proposal on Tuesday October 5, 2004 and their recommendation to the Council will be for a one day event, not the two day event that our Committee proposed. Our Committee is still requesting the City Council approve our proposal for a two day event in 2005. We do not believe that a Parade with a one day Festival is feasible in 2005 given the limited time in which to properly plan. The fixed costs would remain — one day or two, with the income from vendors, food court and Carnival cut in half. In addition, with St. Patrick's Day in the middle of the week, there would be absolutely no reason for anyone to come to downtown Hermosa Beach and utilize the businesses in town on Sunday March 13th unless there is an Irish Festival to attract their interest. Additionally, what sponsor money we have been able to generate would likely be reduced by the fact that the event would be one and not two days and in some cases, sponsors might not be willing to contribute at all. The idea of a one day event for this coming year is counterproductive and frankly, our Committee is not interested in doing all the work associated with the event on a one day basis. I would point out that two years ago rain postponed the first day of our event and only the beautiful sunny Sunday allowed us to recoup any money. Even with Sunday, the events would have been over $6,000 in the red had it not been for the opportunity for our Committee to work the Chambers's Fiesta Beer Garden which netted us enough money to break even. The risk with a one day event is just too great for a group of volunteers in an independent committee to take. It was our intention that 2005 would be the last year that our Committee would produce the St. Patrick's Day Parade and Festival as an independent committee. We were looking forward to opening discussion with the City Departments, Chamber of Commerce and other organizations in town to see who might have interest in taking over the functions of the Parade and Festival with the assistance of our Committee members, perhaps with some of our • • Committee members becoming members of a subcommittee for whatever organization took over the events. This would allow for an orderly transition and allow our Committee to protect our interest in maintaining the Parade and Festival as an event that promoted Irish culture and heritage. We would prefer that the Council grant us their approval for our two day event in 2005 and allow for open discussion throughout next year to determine the future of the event. If, however, the members of the Council prefer to adopt the position of the Parks and Recreation Commission for a one day event, we will sadly have to decline to produce the events in 2005 and be satisfied that for ten years we produced an event that our Committee and the entire Community could be proud of. I, personally, have gotten old and grouchy over the last ten years and have no intention of appearing before the Council to grovel, beg or negotiate. My days of being diplomatic went by the wayside when I retired from my job. I believe we have done something of value and you either want it or you don't. If you don't, I will turn over to the City all the lists of previous Parade participants, Festival Vendors, Food Vendors, Entertainers, etc. and wish you luck. Sincerely, J Travers Devine Co -Chair, SBSPDC Main Stag Street Type H baracades Basch • 10th Annual St Patrick's Day Weekend Festival March 13 & 14, 2004 Strand Bathrooms c) ureguard StatCn Strand Beach Onva Petting Zoo Ent. Exp. LJ Kiddy Carnival O1c 5 0 0.-A Kiddy Carnival Street Closure Type II Baracades Beach Club LIghtHouse Shirt Tails Zippy's Pizza Treasure Chest Patrick Molloy's Aloha Sharkeez Sangria Roberts Liquor B of I Santini MN K.Eanh 101 20 5. Shin cads Treasure Chest • • m S 0 ElFamty Names ❑ Major sponsor Beachwear HO Five Spyder Daily Breeze Hermosa Avenue 24 25 2s Immo 1. 27 2s 21 Eli I1! • • • 35 40 Committee Information 8 sales Beach Mermaid Poop Deck Good Stuff Beach Drive Cantina Real Pier Surf LappeRs Avank Bakery Beccaclo Beach Wear High Flve Spyder Surf Brewskrs Cid Bank Parking tot "B" Conte compound s Band Parking St. Patrick's. Day Layout - Street Closures - Set up 7:00 AM 10:30 AM Ardmore Parade Line Up Green belt 5 Ardmore Parade Entrance & street closure` Lt v ■r v •► •r NV 0 .0J v ® e Valley Dr. 's .• •• •r NV NA v •• v •. v •• •,• I• •k I• •• I• •• A► v V IV v NA •• v Parade Check In •• N► s► v A• NV NV A• NI Fire Police City Hall Bard St. Bard St. v t• v 41, •• v AA AA Ak Ak Alk %/ v N• iP V Street closure type II baracades Ik •r 4- •V AV •,R NV •• NV •► •• •1 v •r Valley Dr. City Basketball/ Clark building Tennis building Clark Field co • • St. Patrick's Day Parade Route Line up on Valley Drive between Pier Ave and 8th Street. Step off at Valley and Pier Avenue; continue west on Pier Avenue to Hermosa Avenue where it will turn south on the west side of Hermosa Avenue and continue to 8`h Street. 2004 Actual Parade & Festival Income Hennessey's Tullamore Dew Civic Organizations Parade Entry Fees Festival Vendor Fees* Food Court Carnival and Petting Zoo Display Vendors Committee Fund Raising Fiesta Beer Garden City Transportation Funds Daily Breeze Irish News K -Earth Consolidated Waste City of Hermosa Cash $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,200.00 $7,400.00 $8,200.00 $3,784.00 $5,500.00 $3,627.00 $8,197.00 Totals $40,908.00 2004 Actual Parade & Festival In -Kind Cash In -Kind Supplies, Expenses, Printing $300.00 Advertising, flyers, non sponsor ads $840.00 Event Insurance $2,595.00 Irish News $500.00 $6,000.00 . Postage $222.00 Mira Costa Parking $580.00 Waste Disposal $1,050.00 $2,000.00 Sanitation Facilities $1,920.00 Security $4,515.00 Power $1,248.00 Shirts/ Street Banners $3,340.00 Event Consulting $5,000.00 Parade (cones, barricades etc) $1,550.00 Festival (stages, sinks, rentals etc) $4,243.88 Parade Bagpipe bands $1,450.00 Festival Entertainment $7,000.00 Clean up $1,200.00 Parade Radios and carts $1,280.00 Daily Breeze K -Earth Transportation Charitable Contributions (80% Profits) $20,000.00 $38,833.88 $2,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.00 (no actuals) $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.00 $20,000.00 • The city allocated no more than $15,000 to pay for City fees and actual city costs — no actual accounting has been received from the City by the committee. Please Note: The actual Parade and Festival raised $32,711.00 and spent 38,833.00 — a loss of $6,122.00. As a result of our Committee's hard work in the Chamber of Commerce sponsored Fiesta Beer and Wine Garden, we earned $8,197.00 which allowed us to end our 2004 year in the black. 2005 Projected Parade & Festival Revenue 2005 Projected Parade & Festival Expenditures Hennessey's Tullamore Dew Patrick Malloy's Civic Organizations Parade Entry Fees Festival Vendor Fees* Food Court Carnival and Petting Zoo Display Vendors Committee Fund Raising Fiesta Beer Garden City Transportation Funds Daily Breeze Irish News K -Earth Consolidated Waste City of Hermosa Totals This projection makes the assu to be utilized for City Fees and Cash In -Kind $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,200.00 $7,000.00 $8,200.00 $2,500.00 $5,500.00 $3,500.00 $8,000.00 $39,900.00 $2,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.00 (no actuals) Supplies, Expenses Advertising flyers, non sponsor ads Printing Event Insurance Irish News Postage Mira Costa Parking Waste Disposal Sanitation Facilities Security Power Shirts/ Street Banners Event Consulting Parade (cones, barricades etc) Festival (stages, sinks, rentals etc) Parade Bagpipe bands Festival Entertainment Clean up Parade Radios and carts Cash In -Kind $300.00 $500.00 $600.00 $2,595.00 $500.00 $6,000.00 $222.00 $480.00 $1,050.00 $2,000.00 $1,920.00 $4,515.00 $1,248.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,550.00 $4,000.00 $1,450.00 $7,000.00 $1,200.00 $1,280.00 Daily Breeze $5,000.00 K -Earth $5,000.00 Transportation $2,000.00 Charitable Contributions (80% Profits) $20,000.00 $37,910.00 $20,000.00 mption that the City will again sponsor the Parade and Festival with and `in-kind' donation not to exceed $15,000.00 actual costs of Police, Fire and Public Works overtime. The Committee began the 2005 Committee $8,000.00 bringing Fiscal year with a balance of $2,075.00. Participation in the Memorial Day Fiesta Beer and Wine Garden netted the our current balance to 10,075.00 in preparation for the 2005 Parade & Festival. • Citi Of 2lermosa Teach Office cilletprantlum To: Lisa Lynn, Recreation Supervisor From: Michael Flaherty, Public Works Superintendent Date: May 11, 2004 Re: St. Patrick's Day Parade 2004 — Comments & Billing Below are some of my concems and/or observations regarding the 2004 St. Patrick's Day Parade and Festival. Photos are provided to illustrate our concerns. Billing for the event is also included. Comments: 1. In the early moming, the signs at 8th St. and Valley Dr. were placed in the street and became a traffic hazard because the signs were left out all night in the staging area (see attached photo). 2. The entrance to the staging area was not monitored. There were several non- registered groups that drove in and got in the parade line (see attached photo). 3. The initial lay out for the NPDES required storm drain protection was good put did not work well in practice. The precautions needed to be removed prior to opening the lot for vehicle parking. Lot B continues to be a problem (see attached photo). 4. Locks and bolts for the bollards at Beach Drive were not put back in place. 5. What firm provided the dumpsters? They say Briggeman Disposal — is this a division of Consolidated? (See attached photo.) 6. The parking signs need to be approved and may be obtained from Public Works prior to the event as part of the permit (see attached photo). 7. The_continuing maintenance of traffic devices must be a priority during the entire event. Private signs blocking must be removed immediately (see attached photo). 8. The rented truck was left on Hermosa Ave. with minimal traffic control with full open traffic for several hours after the end of the parade. It should have been removed once the parade ended and before reopening the street (see attached photo). 9. Cable protection was unacceptable throughout the event. This is a serious hazard. Cable boxes are the only authorized method (see attached photo). Attachment E 10. Lot B was not utile correctly. Parking was coned off Rout authorization. Lot B will not be available for headquarters. Lot A will be available for that purpose (see attached photo). 11. Please return all City equipment. This includes barricades, traffic signs, etc. (see attached photo). 12. There remains the problem of clean up of Lot A and 11ll' Street on Monday morning through early afternoon (see attached photo). * This issue must be addressed. At the very least, all materials need to be consolidated so that the area can be put back into normal use (see attached photo). 13. Spray chalk on the street and/or the Plaza is no longer permitted. 14. Councilman Tucker provided photos that also address these issues (see attached photos). Billing: Banner installation and removal: 2 each @ $236.00 $ 472 Downtown/Plaza Cleaning 1,950 Superintendent field inspection: 4 hours @ $ 80.00 320 Storm Drain preparation 2 men x 4 hrs @ $ 51.00 408 Total $ 3,150 HAB951PWFILESUNTEROFF1st. pats day 2004.doc • Page 2 • • 27 September 2004 1052 Bayview Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Mayor Art Yoon and City Council Members 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Subject: 200 Pier Avenue Office Condominium Project Recommendations & Petition CC: Planning Commission Members Dear Mayor and Council Members, OVERVIEW The Planning Commission agenda on Tuesday 21 September 2004 included the subject proposed project at 200 Pier Avenue for public hearing (Item 10 on that agenda). The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to approve the project subject to the stars recommendations on unassigned parking and some other minor details. The project itself is a 54 Unit Commercial Condo complex of 333 sq feet each with 56 parking spaces. No CCR's have yet been submitted for city and resident review according to city staff. These condos are intended to be individually sold, but the owner admits many may be bought by one entity or the whole complex bought and managed as an entity. The existing structure at 200 Pier will be demolished and a new project with four buildings will be built. Parking will be via two ingress and egress points on Bayview and Manhattan Ave. We have concerns that were not addressed by staff or the commission that are addressed in this letter and signed by a number of residents. Let us first say, we are very supportive of a project that is good for the city, good for the owner, and an improvement over the existing structure, that resides at 200 Pier. In the planning commission's public hearing, the members, in the end, really ignored any of the resident concerns who spoke. Had the planning commission tried to lessen the perceived impact or instructed staff to study some mitigation measures, this letter would have been unnecessary. They did not and we feel unheard. Four residents in the affected area stated their concerns for parking and traffic, bulk and density, and trash. These residents were a former member of the Hermosa planning commission who lives on Bayview, a 30 year resident of Bayview, myself a 5 year resident of Bayview who is also a 25 year resident of Hermosa & Manhattan, as well as and a resident on Manhattan Ave. Many residents who watched it on cable supported our notions. SUPPLEMENTAL 5INFORMATION • • indefinitely by whatever means appropriate. Any intended or future use like this would invalidate any environmental impact on its face. Bulk. Density, and Landscaping Bayview is a narrow street. Landscaping has been a focus on Pier and Manhattan Avenue at the suggestion of city staff and very minimal on Bayview. Bayview is the maximum point of residential interface at the closest proximity. Bayview is a residential street. This project increases the bulk mostly on Bayview. There should therefore be a great focus here. The existing structure has quite a bit of light and air because parking is open on the ground. The city staff suggested that this is a "lower profile" project than the current structure. This is a project that increases space by 50% (12000 to 18000 sf) and adds a parking structure. It is hardly viewed as lower profile by residents and will be quite bulky and constricting from the Bayview perspective. Condition Whoever (city or owners) is required to install and maintain the landscaping must ensure that VERY mature and sufficient planting is installed and maintained fronting on Bayview. The city, the property owner and subsequent office condo association must maintain these plantings and ensure they are attractive and healthy indefinitely. This is the city's responsibility or the office condo associations depending on who is responsible for this landscaping. City staff suggested options on both sides. Trash and Property Maintenance The existing complex is poorly maintained and there is always bulk trash such as TV's, large boxes, couches, etc on Bayview that are unsightly and detract from local property values. The trash receptacle(s) in the new complex can't be visible from the street and must be contained in the complex. After the public hearing had closed, in answering questions, the project architect said it would be inside the building and rolled out weekly in time for pickup. Condition The CCR's need to have this trash containment addressed in the body of it, as well as an onsite person that performs this function and maintains the property. No individual owner will be doing this. The office condo association must have an onsite person to handle trash coordination, minor maintenance and cleaning, and handle the 56 potential owners which may be having unit issues or desire to modify condo configurations (which would require city approval), etc. This will mitigate issues of all kinds for the future tenants/owners, the city, and residents. The State of California requires residential complexes greater than 16 units to have an onsite residential manager. 56 office condos need to have an onsite person to handle duties of the building. There will be a number of things for the onsite person to do. • • Conditions There are mitigations to any increased traffic with the project in its current size and scale: 1. Turn restrictions. Signs posted that allow no left turn into the Bayview ingress point of 200 Pier heading northbound from 10th street. As well as, no right turn out of the complex onto Bayview headed southbound towards 10th street. All traffic must be forced to enter and exit via Pier, not through the residential portion of the street. The city will need to step up monitoring and enforcement via patrol officers and/or parking attendants on Bayview and probably in the complex itself. 2. Tenant Mix. There is no control of tenant mix. The CUP and the CCR's (not yet submitted) should have a tenant mix requirement. It can't be exceeded at initial sale or at any point in the future given the then current mix. It can't exceed for instance, N% retail, Y% professional, Z% medical professionals, X% other, etc. This controls the type of traffic and the number of spaces needed to support such. Although not probable, a 100% retail environment would generate much more load and invalidate any parking and traffic study. There is currently nothing to preclude this besides the market. Think ahead and restrict it. 3. Businesses Using Residential Passes. The city must get control of only residents getting on street residential parking. Businesses should be precluded from getting these. The residential parking area on the street in the affected area is full. In general, this issue is independent of this project. However, no one who purchases these office units at this building should be able to obtain passes unless they also live in the affected area. 56 office condos with increased visitors and traffic have to use the parking that is planned there. Office owners can't park in residential areas. There are currently local business employees that have passes that park in the area. 4. Traffic Measurement. The city will measure traffic on Bayview before the project completes and yearly for at least 5 years after project completion. The city will undertake any necessary expense to monitor traffic. The city will fund any expense to correct any traffic related issues on Bayview that exceeds by some margin the traffic profile before the project. 5. Other Parking Uses. The new parking structure here can never be leased, shared or used by other businesses than those at the 200 Pier complex. This was alluded to by the Chairman of the Planning Commission is his remarks after the public hearing closed. This concerns us more than the project itself. Such a suggestion is clearly an indication we were not heard. The parking structure at this project is not to solve the city's or any other businesses parking issues now or at any point in the future. The owner indicated his intent that the parking not be after-hours, which we appreciate, but the condition needs to be assured that the current owner, future condo owners and/or associations cannot lease or share this parking under any kind of written or verbal agreement. This use needs to be precluded • • The commission concluded after the public hearing had closed that the project is good for the city and is a big improvement over what's there now. That conclusion would be easy to come by given what is there now. The residents also want what's good for the city, we want local business to excel, for the city to have an increased revenue sources, and to attract professional, upscale businesses. We also want Mr. Shaar, as the property owner, to realize the property's highest and best use and benefit in such. However, we also want the project because of its size and scale, not to impact the residents that live in the area. We believe a win-win is possible that emphasizes great business, great neighbors, and great city benefits. RECOMMENDATIONS In light of such, there are a number of things that can be done to mitigate the impact to the residents and still allow this project to proceed in its current state. These are items the planning commission should have heard us on and items that the city staff should make as part of their recommendations for the project to proceed. These are items that need to be addressed. Parking and the Traffic on Bayview. Apparently the city just approved the parking regulations/specifications in the last 12 months which encourage this type of building. We agree that the property owner shouldn't be penalized by what the city has encouraged, but do strongly encourage the city to revisit this parking code independently of this project. However, every resident who spoke at the public hearing on this project believes the parking is woefully insufficient and that traffic will increase substantially more than that estimated in the traffic study and concurred with by city staff. Bayview in particular is a narrow street. Many homes reside on the street now with front door access. Many of the other properties, whose front door resides elsewhere, use it as their front door regularly because their garage is on Bayview. Bayview is narrow and poorly maintained. Bayview will not support increased traffic of a project this magnitude. It's difficult to get by now with two cars traveling. Anyone who thinks 54 upper -scale, attractive looking units with upscale professional and retail owners, with 50% more space and 12 more units, with two ingress/egress points with one on Bayview, will not encounter more significant traffic on Bayview is really not seeing reality. There are several uses that could occur which will have more than one employee per unit as suggested in the parking and traffic study. The traffic model doesn't work and we don't buy into it. There most definitely will be an environmental impact to residents particularly on Bayview with the projects current state. • • SUMMARY The owners and residents of affected parcels on Bayview request the above changes to staff recommendations that may be the cities responsibilities to implement and/or affect the conditions or CCR's tied to the property. We have affixed our signatures to attest to such. Let us come to quick agreement on such so that the project owner, the city, the affected residents, and all of Hermosa can benefit in the project as planned. Thank you for taking the time to hear us. We look forward to being and being treated as good neighbors, increasing business opportunities for all, and creating more opportunities for the city. Sincerely yours, Bob Dunn and the Impacted Residents of Bayview (attached) Owner & Residentt Pier Project Petition J` �trtton .� .'"'_'-----Tom.-•��.,..... 09/ 7/(M id 11_r� IJ .kc- r4c/ih6 /h -r4.. _4..__ o_c. , ,--.. l t Lit, ' .r . TAM 1040 ivi ti I ) _ o_e, i?-- _ bk d'ia�0.1 4 J4 L L .. 4. :0& -C :M 4a. ¢ i'. �"}Rr /+r4_:2_lF y _ett,W]4i2.r-.k:shkei sxSA. I a e1 M'1_61yr goes eqreo 441. NO t ovre,z'y /0e7 1.11 ^- -� r qat C .' ()kin --t - -fi ro-,1 rt • Owner & Resident 200 Pier Project Petition • 09127/04 • iM .Gz,,,.„-t.. ice- ,.r - 1 1� ice.- _ rit.40 I I g Ay IJ 1 4,A.,. —1 I I } 1 d`1(t � { 1 7 - } r �W } } 1 1 • Jackie Drasco Page 1 of 1 From: ERICSONBCH@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 2:59 PM To: City Clerk Subject: 200 Pier ave development Please present this to the council for there consideration of this project 10-26-2004. October 26, 2004 Hermosa Beach City Council Members C/o City Clerk Re, 200 Pier Ave Hermosa Beach Council Meeting October 26th 2004 I'm writing in support of the development proposed for 200 Pier Ave. I am a property owner at 239 Pier Ave., Hermosa Beach. This project has a "Heart of the City Location" which has the potential to be an anchor development for the upper Pier Avenue area and could be the first of other redevelopments or remodels to the aging commercial corridor. The concept of developing a commercial condominium complex will have the added benefits of bringing 50 plus news owners to the city, all who will have a vested interest in the buildings maintenance and appearance. The businesses have the potential to be long term, and the hours of operation would probably tend to be normal workday business hours, reducing the stress between residential and late night commercial uses. It is my understanding that the project meets or exceeds all of the development requirements, and has met the parking requirements through agreements with other local commercial owners. This seems to be a better use of Pier Avenue land than to have excessive parking spaces unused in the evenings. I believe many of the older commercial building owners are watching the Planning and Council actions on this project to see which way the wind is really blowing, before upgrading or redeveloping their own properties. Thanks for your consideration of my comments. Dan Ericson 2461 Silverstrand Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 e* SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPLE ENTAL wrnomisTinnt 10/26/2004 • • 200 Pier Ave Hermosa Beach Council Meeting October 26th 2004 I'm writing in support of the development proposed for 200 Pier Ave. ✓ It has a "Heart of the City Location" has the potential to be an anchor locale for Pier Ave Redevelopment ✓ Attract New Daytime Business to the Pier Ave Corridor ✓ Condo Concept will create a locale with Businesses that will have a vested interest & Ownership in the property, (not just a single absentee owner) ✓ Association maintenance and upkeep ✓ Appears to meet or exceed development requirements ✓ Project is not buying into the Parking District, providing its own parking to code I believe many of the older commercial building owners are watching the Planning and Council actions on this project to see which way the wind is really blowing, before upgrading or redeveloping their properties. LEGAL DATA Project A . 200 Pier Avenue each, CA 90254 Zoning: C-2 Maximum Building Haight: 30'-0' Prososed Floor Awa Maximum: 54 loaceoblo units 6 333 op. ft. 2 locker rooms + 1 conference room total now floor aren Parking: 56 apneas (16 compnct, 40 atandnrd) A.P.N.: 4167009-038 Legal Info: Lots 15 thru 18 6 N'LV 10.00' of Lot 14, Block 48 First Addition to Hermosa Boesch M.B. 1-5960 Lot Siro: 17.559 oqunro foot Setbacko: Frontyerd: 0'-0" Sidoynrd: 0%0" Rearyard: 5'-0" PROJECT DATA Owner: Sohaar Homes, Inc. 800 Manhattan Bosch Blvd., #204 Manhattan Gooch, CA 90254 (31 0) 937.5161 office contact: Nick Scheer Architect Growdon+Cllns Architocts, Inc. 211 E. Thompson Blvd. venture, CA 93001 (805) 652-0824 concoct: Bill Growdon, AIA - 17.982 s.f. - 666 s,f. 18,648 s.f. Daaignnrc Starr Design Group. Inc. 215 War Avonuo, suite B Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 3766997 contact: Jonathan Starr CMI Englnoor: Dann Engineer° 3014 Dal Amo Blvd.. 921 Torrance, CA 80503 (310) 542-9433 200 pier ave. commercial infill Growdon+Cline a"- wr CCorchliocrt. corn AI. 4 4 ff4ae0ital 04:444 54.2124 /43402401 hermosa beach, ca n project by ochaor homes. Inc. rt t" • • • ylg. MVO /..J (i.AM• _ M1.L. l[•R• N.W. 14.1 64.a 1Ml 1WK AMY "M."� t. __ - _.jUIiir:::.1 — — • — Y-tIQ47 ..p..07 \ —• .. \ ' \'\ .� \ \ \ •\ \ \ \ �` \ •\ \� V ii • \ • ♦ \ s • , 111 I\ _. \ i 7 1 i ,`6') 4 i. 7. `) '----' )...-'1. -. i,-_ \ aa \) 1 /\\ �\ �. /; / 200 pier ave. commercial infill hermosa beach, ca a pr c act by echoer homes. Inc. t /jr 1/8" scale /" • � • $ j • • 21 spaces between Monterey and Manhattan Ave 5taken 16 open Parking condition 10:30 am Tuesday 200 pier ave. commercial infill hermosa beach, ca praiect by .char Mantas. inc._ Growdon+Cline arclitedia— ilidieorlebAullermOrwlepnwl www QCorehitivi.Con, 1111 otamacw041.0mtnestX101 1.44-142.4241-110$4524123 • •••••• htliV manhattan avenue proposed liner bldgs. 200 pier ave. commercial infill hermosa beach. ca a project by echoer hornets. Inc. Growdon+Cline arehlteet8"- SOIRPHOIANI•61/Milletrafle wwOCOMMtett$412" earmemlolatoarnellta 0-11014324424 401412403 • •••• atICV 200 pier ave. commercial infill hermosa beach, ca a project by =hear homes. Ina Growdon+Cline uchltectse. dedgMeheleallendevelliperent www.0Cochttocts.e•nt 211•tunisoliblviasseen101 o40$404424 140$41244123 uij tn. atuve f11?IVIS w Iii «.111D1 parking area level 1 28 standard spaces net t'kW waling odpcenl building na*�l fw 1p. •'Ot fl e4 'l we, '4'40 G gn1Aq VI I'Ose141CO0{. WYamir p,o wok, o *MIL" .a..o VOM OW bS pl�'t Ic.ipeY AI+ O12.111 pail- are. tol[4. n1 COW Immo Woo e -oto Auery omit MK-/OCare C.V.OSl Ow hOe mo* COW°,1%p t O**** Irmo on* boa Ko,h moo COV ormrs*'Kaon coe.. [wood fere 11.0yOrt rod Voe+tP manhattan ave. site/ landscaping lower street level – - -- — -- -1 200 pier ave. commercial infill hermosa beach, ca o project by achaar hom{oe. iae4 Growdon+Cline BPChitOCtS"- w. C CofC hI l O o a f.0 O r11 21I {M441N14000X01 O410*4U4S212412{ **0{4114127 I�b]d bM wUCFO .. ..4na. A. catecIOltil "A tn064.11.f t „c -IO OCeM1 noe a wean eV beg N).c nyeccoy. boa* pawn' Cat. bu?O6 000.10.160 Mcv110wF Col•V iucvt u0'wx site/landscaping upper street level - 1 200 pier ave. commercial infill hermosa beach, ca a project by echoer homes. inc. Growdon+Cline architects— .. CCorc MIOCI4cpm AtNeleene I.M 4 041054$24114041054$24114i? -017t 1-001457-02O 0173 • • 3rd floor plan 200 pier ave. commercial infill Growdon+Cline �ctr ... GCoechnnicti..con otonr+raU3 os sso4014$240124 r.�oSesow hermosa beach, ca a protect by echear homes. inc. • • Tadrtne 4th floor plan 200 pier ave. commercial infill hermosa beach, ca • priyact by oaha•r homes, Inc. Growdon+Cline architects ...y..00oc....c,co 6Coronu�eneom Tr•r4U4*ai.4/ 4at0o0t ►eos��stea. r•.s�s:aao t�uyl11uNxrrn�t �y� aii■ismum a■In■i ii61 iel ral ■t ?eta, i!! - 73, uskIL;1kifij � ,Isx 1491 ttit OR(1aa �rw�sa� i►11111t11I4I flli1tt1111111111t1111 11[11111HII'1 " �iw1Si ���tutwlStttrl�it�����■■■4■�r z_ � f .1'x _,�, wr.rryrrrur ar�r. �~ t1Y11.i unuttunru,u�nti■uuuMltltfllttttt�utuii' _at", ; _ cPl1�Ilhlil = i^,'. �■� enc �ar -��2. Itll HanoalI.aai■yi..ai�a.LMil. ..4A•11'' 200 pier ave. commercial infill hermosa beach, ca a proiact by achaar homes. Inc. 1/8' scale .OP - EI.E/AIi!'ih Growdon+Cline architects roc- te o r1w.GCara Iaa i.-om ohrowernbloi-1OD7 p -1108.452.0112p-1108.452.01124 e-1105-45 201123 • building cross section 200 pier ave. commercial infill hermosa beach, ca a prajrct by echoor homes. inc. scale: 1/8" = 1,-0" • .V.,' • int* Growdon+Cline e1ct11teC an 6C•,�bi,.C4.C.m iti..:icww.••al0.i P.6.1?4C4 1401 4S74W inc i gonial view at Domer of pier and manhatton eve. olloy view toward pier eve. view at pier ave etrwteCape comer of pier and manhattan eve. ahoy view from pier eve. aerial Wow 200 pier ave. commercial infill Growdon+Cline archutects .aco�° n I.e wd ww0 m.anpa 0411114.6241123 N 4$2 ®1 ...If.f»Op4 l.fKiA,p3 hermosa beach. ca a prgeet by echoer homes. Inc. We Support the Redevelopment of 200 Pier Avenue We support new office space in downtown Hermosa Beach We think that the required parking (3 spaces per 1000 square feet) is adequate We recognize the Architect's proposed design has met all zoning and planning requirements We appreciate the added consumers during day that the new office spaces will provide We recognize many unused parking spaces during the daytime business hours, especially in the area of the proposed building.. We believe the tenants of the new building should increase business activity in the downtown area. We support proposed building because it is a healthy addition to downtown encouraging non -alcohol related consumers. Name Address/Business Name Signature ? Ave . 0 S IZ Pcp-i cu— &1► bpci-Z 1-4�-9+1-7 s 555 42e J Kon C�Qa �kr Itis Qt y- AU(U 1/6;T4.1.41- 7 . — >-0 5-- Pi E P Lq v . Ss� Fu'�,v �avU ataLir k¢_ io /of-. -x.e:�:2 -nd-pb- . Name Address/Business Name • N 2-1 5- /9f c Ave # Lace. 1 Q5 2 3 pVi a e 4)f 3 a 0 pRsv • o Av• c Roe CLL b(7)1 „ r al(s-e%r1 65 555 cr,✓ -3z/A 4/ Mo. 4 p, -p- ` H ,\,„_,,,,,u,--,..._. s,5_ (Pe 4,____ /dlZ7 -)i/ /r 7- . � c-�- I -?9. ,.r 4_,14 (,Lj d /J Li,10 p,e.�-" T/f�,5,/.frs,,P LI' -0 f/ =>Z 61-ech Po 4-0-4 f-,,,,, *L. C._:.(r_hce, 1 o__ 4,2, 0 v-- Oh, v %40 L71 SSU 148 / • • October 19, 2004 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council October 26, 2004 SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 04-16, CON 04-15 200 PIER AVENUE APPLICANT: NICK SHAAR, 800 MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 902664 REQUESTS: PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 061290 FOR AN 18,648 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH 54 COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS. Planning Commission Recommendation To approve the project subject to conditions as contained in the attached resolution. Background The applicant is proposing to construct a new commercial building containing 54 commercial condominium units and replace an existing three-story commercial office building of approximately 12,500 square feet with 42 rental units and 44 parking spaces. The Planning Commission unanimously approved the project at their September 21, 2004 meeting. Project Information ZONING: C-2 Restricted Commercial GENERAL PLAN: General Commercial LOT SIZE: 17,559 Sq. Ft. PROPOSED BUILDING SIZE: 18 648 Gross Square Feet FLOOR AREA RATIO: 1.06 REQUIRED PARKING: 56 Spaces PARKING PROVIDED: 56 Spaces ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Negative Declaration (recommended) Analysis The proposed project involves demolition of the existing structure located on south side of Pier Avenue at Manhattan Avenue and construction of a commercial office complex, containing over 18,000 square feet in four buildings, connected by a two -levels of parking and common open space. The buildings will contain 54 commercial condominiums of 333 square feet. The buildings are designed to maximize the number of commercial units with direct street frontage on Pier Avenue or Manhattan Avenue, and to maximize westerly ocean views. This is achieved by locating the parking towards the east and southerly property lines, so the buildings front on the major streets, and by stepping the buildings to follow the slope to take advantage of ocean views. The project is designed as an "office campus" with a contemporary style that includes a stepped building facade, standing seam metal roofs, smooth plaster and wood exterior finishes, exposed beams, and open decks. Sc • • PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Pursuant to Chapter 17.58 of the Zone Code, a Precise Development Plan (PDP) is required with new construction. The PDP requirements are conformance with minimum standards of the zone, and general review of the project relating to compatibility with surrounding uses. The project meets the basic zoning requirement of the C-2 zone. It provides a 5 -foot building setback adjacent to the residential property to the south and complies with the 30 -foot height limit providing a lower profile from the street than the existing three-story development. Beyond these basic standards, the project will substantially improve the area and help revitalize a prominent location in the City's downtown. The proposed commercial and professional office use is compatible with surrounding uses, and consistent with the general objectives of the City Council to balance existing restaurant and bar uses with office and retail uses. The plans also depict locations for a wireless antenna and exit stairs in the require setback which are not permitted. A separate C.U.P. application must be approved for the antennae. Staff does not support the antenna location within the required yard adjacent to residential uses. TRAFFIC AND PARKING Vehicle access to the site will be from Manhattan Avenue to access the lower level of the parking garage and from the alley (Bay View Drive), to access the upper level consistent with the current access to parking for the existing building. Each level will contain 28 parking spaces. An existing curb cut will be eliminated on Pier Avenue adding up to five public parking spaces. The traffic analysis submitted by the applicant shows that the impacts of the proposed project are insignificant relative to the current use. The project is expected to generate a net AM and PM peak trip increase of 6 vehicle trips and a net overall increase of 40 vehicle trips on a typical weekday based upon the building occupancy. It is further concluded that no significant traffic impacts are forecast for the nearby study intersections that require mitigation. Also, the existing parking on Bay View Drive, which directly backs into the alley will be replaced by the proposed driveway entrance into the parking structure, allowing cars to enter and exit without backing into the alley. This will improve safety and reduce congestion along this section of Bay View Drive. Based on the current parking ratio in the downtown of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of office or retail space, the proposed 18,648 square foot building requires 56 parking spaces. ' The applicant is proposing 56 spaces in two parking levels that complies with parking requirements. The required parking must not be assigned and must be available to all building users in order to ensure maximum parking efficiency during peak and non -peak occupancy periods of the building. If parking spaces were assigned to a specific owner or tenant, it would preclude others from using that space thereby diminishing parking for all building users. For example, assigned parking for Unit A would be unavailable to Unit B even if Unit A was unoccupied at the time. Therefore given the current parking requirement that applies to the project, it would be unwise to assign parking. 2 • • The applicant has submitted a parking analysis prepared by Linscott, Law and Greesnspan to address the issue of parking for office condominiums. According to this separate analysis, the office condominiums will be marketed to sole proprietors, seeking the benefits of owning versus leasing office spaces. The assumption is that tenants will be non-medical professional offices and businesses. With an assumed 90% occupancy rate, and a visitor rate of one per 5 businesses the total demand would be 53 spaces. Due to the unique size of the proposed condominium units, the traffic engineer was unable to find comparable projects. By assigning a portion of the demand to visitors, the analysis also assumes that the parking will be in a common unassigned parking facility. It should be noted that the addition of five public on -street parking spaces helps to mitigate a possible increase in on -street parking demand that can occur during peak use of the commercial building. Further the peak use of the project will typically be during the daytime on weekdays, when public on -street parking is most available. In addition some of the common areas such as the proposed locker room and the conference room, totaling 670 square feet, will not contribute to the parking demand, but have been included in the gross floor area parking calculation. COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUMS The condominium form of ownership for commercial buildings is subject to the requirements as set forth in Section 17.22.080 through 17.22.140 of the Zoning Ordinance, including the requirement for a Conditional Use Permit. Also, it requires the approval of a condominium tract map. The guidelines are similar to those required for the Precise Development Plan, with the additional requirement that Covenants Codes and Restrictions (CC&R's) be included in the project to "ensure that potential problems resulting from lack of continuous and centralized management, do not impact upon the public health, safety and welfare." The project is designed to contain 54 small ownership units, of 333 square feet each. The target market for buyers will be local residents who are sole proprietors who operate business within the area, and/or work out of their homes. Whether this projected ownership profile will be realized, however, is only speculation. A larger business may wish to purchase several units, or an investor may purchase units to lease to start-up businesses. Another scenario is that the units may all be sold to one entity, and the building may be operated as a more traditional office space, with centralized management. (This was the result of the City's only other commercial condominium project on 2200 P.C.H2). Approval of the condominium tract map will make condominium sales an option for the developer, but certainly does not require or guarantee that each individual unit will be sold to separate "sole proprietors". The following conditions were imposed by the Planning Commission, in addition to standard conditions for commercial projects and condominiums: 1. The location and installation of wireless communication facilities are subject to review of a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 17.46.240. 2. All available parking shall be shared among the occupants of the buildings on site, and owned in common, which shall be clearly set forth in project CC & R's, and no parking spaces shall be assigned for exclusive use by any owner, occupant, or tenant. 3. Submittal of a parking management plan to ensure owners/occupants have priority parking on site (i.e. a parking sticker or card) and to address parking lot signage. 3 • • 4. CC&R's must be submitted for review and approval by the City. 5. A 5 -foot setback, clear from ground to sky, must be provided along the south property line. 6. Tree planting and accent landscaping in the pedestrian entry on Pier Avenue. 7. Provision of a minimum of 7 street trees and tree grates on the Pier Avenue sidewalk as approved by the Public Works Department, or deposit of funds in an amount to cover the cost of the improvement in accordance with the Downtown Implementation Plan. 8. Provision of 4 street trees on Manhattan Avenue. 9. Decorative paving surfaces for the pedestrian entry, and entries into the parking areas. 10. Any major changes require Planning Commission approval and minor changes may be approved by the CD Director subject to confirmation of the Commission. 11. Provision of a decorative block wall along southerly property line adjacent to residential uses. Concur: Sol : lumenfeld Dire tor Community De elopment Department Stephen " B ell, Ci Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution to sustain the Commission decision 2. P.C. Resolution and Minutes 3. Location Map 4. Traffic and Parking Study 5. Initial Study Checklists 6. Photos 7. Correspondence o . ertsoti Senior Planner 1. Pursuant to Section 17.44.040, the parking requirement in the downtown area for retail and office uses of was reduced from 4 per 1000 to 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area as approved by the Coastal Commission and the City Council on February 24, 2004. This reduced requirement is in effect for 3 years unless the City conducts further parking studies to justify this lower standard per requirements of the Coastal Commission. 2. The project constructed in 1981-82 contains 31 office condominium units, with an average size of 700 square feet, all are currently owned by the same owner, and the units are rented out under centralized management. F:\B95\CD\CC\PDP-200PIER.doc T 1 • • RESOLUTION 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO SUSTAIN THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 061290 FOR AN 18,648 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING CONTAINING 54 COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 200 PIER AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS NW 10 -FEET OF LOT 14, AND ALL OF LOTS 15, 16, 17 & 18, BLOCK 48, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and -order as -follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Nick Shaar owner of property at 200 Pier Avenue seeking approval of a Precise Development Plan to construct an 18,648 Square foot commercial building complex and parking structure, a Conditional Use Permit and vesting tentative tract map for 54 commercial condominium units. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the subject application for on September 21, 2004, and considered testimony and evidence. Based on the testimony and evidence received the Planning Commission approved the project subject to conditions as set for the in P.C. Resolution 04-34. Section 3. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to reconsider the decision of the Planning Commission to approve the Precise Development Plan on October 26, 2004, and heard testimony and evidence, both written and oral, that was presented to and considered by the City Council. Section 4. Based on the record of decision of the Planning Commission and the evidence received at the public hearing, the City Council makes the following factual findings pertaining to the application for a Precise Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Tentative Tract Map: 1. The applicant is proposing to construct a commercial building for a office and commercial condominiums containing 18,648 square feet with two levels of parking, which requires a Precise Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 17.58 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The buildings on the site contain 54 separate commercial units intended to be sold separately as condominium units. Commercial condominiums require a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 17.22.100 of the Zoning Ordinance and approval of a tentative tract map. 3. The subject site is located on the south side of Pier Avenue at its intersection with Manhattan Avenue in the downtown district. The property currently contains a 12,500 square foot commercial building. The proposed project involves the demolition of all existing structures and the construction of a new commercial building and two levels of parking. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 s s 4. Since the project is located in the downtown district, it is subject to the parking requirements of Section 17.44.040 which require 3 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area. Section 5. Based on the foregoing factual findings and consistent with the findings of the Planning Commission the City Council makes the following findings pertaining to the subject application: 1. The project and map are consistent with applicable general and specific plans and is in compliance with the use and development requirements of the Zoning Ordinance; 2. The site is zoned C-2 and is physically suitable for the -type and -density of proposed development and the project and proposed use comply with the development standards contained therein; 3. The subdivision or types of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; 4. The subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; 5. Design of the proposed subdivision is compatible and consistent with applicable elements of the City's General Plan, and is compatible with the immediate environment; 6. The project, as conditioned, will conform to all zoning and condominium laws and criteria and will be compatible with neighboring residential properties; 7. The project provides all required off-street parking. 8. The general criteria of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 17.58.030 for granting or conditionally granting a Precise Development Plan have been considered. In making this finding, the Planning Commission has determined that: a. The proximity of the project to existing commercial and residential uses in the downtown area will not result in negative effects with incorporation of the conditions below. b. The project will not have a negative impact on ocean views from residential areas, as the building height will be lower than the existing building. c. The amount of proposed off-street parking is sufficient for actual need and consistent with the parking requirements for the Downtown District. Further, the closure of an existing curb cut will result in up to 5 additional on -street parking spaces.. 1 28 29 • • d. The use proposed is compatible with each other and with the area. e. The capacity and safety of the streets serving the area is adequate for the traffic volume estimated to be generated by the project as shown by the traffic impact analysis prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan, which demonstrates that traffic generation will not significantly increase as compared to the existing uses on the site, and the increase will not result in significant impacts on nearby intersections. f. The proposed exterior signs and decor are sufficiently compatible with existing establishments in the area with incorporation of the conditions below. g. Building and driveway orientation is appropriate to minimize noise and traffic impacts on nearby residential areas. h. The project will not result in adverse noise, odor, dust or vibration environmental impacts. i. The proposed use will not result in an adverse impact on the City's infrastructure and/or services. 9. The criteria of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 17.58.030(C) for denial of a Precise Development Plan are not applicable. In making this finding, the Planning Commission has determined that: a. The project will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity, or interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in such area, because of excessive dissimilarity or inappropriateness of design in relation to the surrounding vicinity. a. The project will not have significant environmental adverse impacts Section 6. Environmental Review. 1. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Staff Environmental Review Committee prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the proposed project. Based upon the Initial Study, the Committee determined that there was no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. City staff thereafter prepared a Negative Declaration for the project and duly provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration. A copy of the Initial Study and Negative Declaration are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. The City Council has reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative Declaration. Based on the whole record, the City Council finds that: (i) the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) there is no substantial evidence that the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment. Based on 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • these findings, the City Council, in concurrence with the Planning Commission, hereby adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for the proposed project. Section 7. Based on the foregoing, the City Council sustains the decision of the Planning Commission and hereby approves the subject Precise Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Vesting Tentative Tract Map subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be substantially consistent with submitted plans as reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting of September 21, 2004, incorporating all revisions as required by the conditions below. Any major modification, including changes in the layout of the condominium units, shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission. Minor ---- --modifications may be approved by the Community Development Director but -shall -- not be final until confirmed by the Planning Commission as a consent calendar item on the Commission agenda. 2. Final plans for building permit issuances shall be revised to incorporate the following. a. A five-foot setback, clear from ground to sky shall be provided along the south property line. b. The plan shall clearly depict parking lot lighting, and all light fixtures shall be located such that property line walls or building walls shield the light source from residences to the southwest, with light directed downward to minimize off-site glare in all directions. c. A decorative block wall shall be provided along the southerly property line. 3. A revised detailed landscape plan for on-site, and off-site landscaping, consistent with the conceptual plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits incorporating the revisions below: a. Tree planting and accent landscaping shall be provided in the pedestrian entry court along Pier Avenue b. A minimum of 7 street trees with tree grates shall be planted along the sidewalk on the Pier Avenue frontage in accordance in accordance with requirements of the Public Works Department, or, alternatively, a deposit of funds in an amount to cover the cost of such planting. c. A minimum of 4 street trees with tree grates shall be planted along the sidewalk along the Manhattan Avenue frontage as approved by the Puublic Works Department. d. Decorative paving surfaces shall be provided at driveway entry areas and at the pedestrian entry court on Pier Avenue. e. Bicycle parking shall be provided in a convenient location, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 1 5 • • 4. All parking shall be shared amongst the occupants and patrons of the buildings on site, and owned in common, which shall clearly be set forth in project CC & R's, and not parking spaces shall be assigned for exclusive use by any owner, occupant, or tenant. A limited number of spaces may signed for short term parking for delivery couriers and short-term visitors. 5. A parking management plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director, setting forth a program to ensure priority parking for the occupants/owners of the building through the use of identification stickers, or passes, or other method, and said plan shall include how the parking plan will be enforced including the signage to be posted in the parking facilities. 6. Architectural treatment.of the building shall be as shown on building elevations and site and floor plans. Any modification shall require approval by the Community Development Director. 7. A detailed comprehensive sign plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director incorporating the following revisions: a. One free-standing sign is permitted, and shall be limited to a monument sign with a maximum height of ten (10) feet. b. A comprehensive sign program shall be submitted for review and all individual tenant or owner signs shall be consistent with that plan. 8. The use of the building and the individual condominium units shall be limited to office and retail commercial uses allowed in the C-2 zone, and shall not include medical or dental clinics, or any other uses subject to greater parking requirements. 9. The location and installation of wireless communication facilities are subject to submittal and approval of separate Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 17.46.240 of the Zoning Ordinance. 10. The project shall meet all requirements of the Condominium Ordinance. a. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions in compliance with the Condominium Ordinance Section 17.22.120 shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. b. Proof of recordation of approved CC & R's shall be submitted to the Community Development Director thirty (30) days after recordation of the Final Map. 11. A detailed drainage and (SUSMP) Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan is required for approval by the Public Works Department, prior to the issuance of building permits and implemented on site, demonstrating best management practices for stormwater pollution control, and for sediment control and erosion control during construction. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • 12. The applicant is responsible for all off-site right-of-way construction required by the Public Works Department, or alternatively, may deposit funds in amount to cover the cost for future right-of-way construction for the Pier Avenue frontage. 13. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Department. 14. Final building plans/construction drawings including site, elevation, floor plan, sections, details, signage, landscaping and irrigation, submitted for building permit issuance shall be reviewed for consistency with the plans approved by the Planning Commission and the conditions of this resolution, and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. 15. All roof equipment shall be located and designed to be screened from public view and any portion that exceeds the height limit shall not cover more than 5% of the roof area. 16. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 17. The Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. 18. Each of the above Conditions of Approval is separately enforced, and if one of the Conditions of Approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. 19. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 20. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. 21. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other le • • regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. Section 8. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. Section 9. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 2004, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1/ 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • P.C. RESOLUTION 04-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 061290 FOR AN 18,648 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING CONTAINING 54 COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 200 PIER AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS NW 10 -FEET OF LOT 14, AND ALL OF LOTS 15,16,17 & 18, BLOCK 48, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Nick Shaar owner of property at 200 Pier Avenue seeking approval of a Precise Development Plan to construct an 18,648 Square foot commercial building complex and parking structure, a Conditional Use Permit and vesting tentative tract map for 54 commercial condominium units. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the subject application for on September 21, 2004, and considered testimony and evidence. Based on the testimony and evidence received the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The applicant is proposing to construct a commercial building for a office and commercial condominiums containing 18,648 square feet with two levels of parking, which requires a Precise Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 17.58 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The buildings on the site contain 54 separate commercial units intended to be sold separately as condominium units. Commercial condominiums require a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 17.22.100 of the Zoning Ordinance and approval of a tentative tract map. 3. The subject site is located on the south side of Pier Avenue at its intersection with Manhattan Avenue in the downtown district. The property currently contains a 12,500 square foot commercial building. The proposed project involves the demolition of all existing structures and the construction of a new commercial building and two levels of parking. 4. Since the project is located in the downtown district, it is subject to the parking requirements of Section 17.44.040 which require 3 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area. Section 3. Based on the foregoing factual findings the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Precise Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1. The project and map are consistent with applicable general and specific plans and is in compliance with the use and development requirements of the Zoning Ordinance; 2. The site is zoned C-2 and is physically suitable for the type and density of proposed development and the project and proposed use comply with the development standards contained therein; 3. The subdivision or types of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; 4. The subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; 5. Design of the proposed subdivision is compatible and consistent with applicable elements of the City's General Plan, and is compatible with the immediate environment; 6. The project, as conditioned, will conform to all zoning and condominium laws and criteria and will be compatible with neighboring residential properties; 7. The project provides all required off-street parking. 8. The general criteria of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 17.58.030 for granting or conditionally granting a Precise Development Plan have been considered. In making this finding, the Planning Commission has determined that: a. The proximity of the project to existing commercial and residential uses in the downtown area will not result in negative effects with incorporation of the conditions below. b. The project will not have a negative impact on ocean views from residential areas, as the building height will be lower than the existing building. c. The amount of proposed off-street parking is sufficient for actual need and consistent with the parking requirements for the Downtown District. Further, the closure of an existing curb cut will result in up to 5 additional on -street parking spaces.. d. The use proposed is compatible with each other and with the area. e. The capacity and safety of the streets serving the area is adequate for the traffic volume estimated to be generated by the project as shown by the traffic impact analysis prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan, which demonstrates that traffic generation will not significantly increase as compared to the existing uses on the site, and the increase will not result in significant impacts on nearby intersections. /3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • f. The proposed exterior signs and decor are sufficiently compatible with existing establishments in the area with incorporation of the conditions below. g. Building and driveway orientation is appropriate to minimize noise and traffic impacts on nearby residential areas. h. The project will not result in adverse noise, odor, dust or vibration environmental impacts. i. The proposed use will not result in an adverse impact on the City's infrastructure and/or services. 9. The criteria of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code,Section 17.58.030(C) for denial of a Precise Development Plan are not applicable. In making this finding, the Planning Commission has determined that: a. The project will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity, or interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in such area, because of excessive dissimilarity or inappropriateness of design in relation to the surrounding vicinity. a. The project will not have significant environmental adverse impacts Section 4. Environmental Review. 1. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Staff Environmental Review Committee prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the proposed project. Based upon the Initial Study, the Committee determined that there was no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. City staff thereafter prepared a Negative Declaration for the project and duly provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration. A copy of the Initial Study and Negative Declaration are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative Declaration. Based on the whole record, the Planning Commission finds that: (i) the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) there is no substantial evidence that the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for the proposed project. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the subject Precise Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Vesting Tentative Tract Map subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be substantially consistent with submitted plans as reviewed by thePlanning Commission at their meeting of 1 September 21, 2004, incorporating all revisions as required by the conditions below. Any major modification, including changes in the layout of the condominium units, shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission. Minor modifications may be approved by the Community Development Director but shall not be final until confirmed by the Planning Commission as a consent calendar item on the Commission agenda. 2. Final plans for building permit issuances shall be revised to incorporate the following. a. A five-foot setback, clear from ground to sky shall be provided along the south property line. b. The'"plan shall clearly depict parking lot lighting, and all light fixtures shall be located such that property line walls or building walls shield the light source from residences to the southwest, with light directed downward to minimize off-site glare in all directions. c. A decorative block wall shall be provided along the southerly property line. 3. A revised detailed landscape plan for on-site, and off-site landscaping, consistent with the conceptual plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits incorporating the revisions below: a. Tree planting and accent landscaping shall be provided in the pedestrian entry court along Pier Avenue b. A minimum of 7 street trees with tree grates shall be planted along the sidewalk on the Pier Avenue frontage in accordance in accordance with requirements of the Public Works Department, or, alternatively, a deposit of funds in an amount to cover the cost of such planting. c. A minimum of 4 street trees with tree grates shall be planted along the sidewalk along the Manhattan Avenue frontage as approved by the Puublic Works Department. d. Decorative paving surfaces shall be provided at driveway entry areas and at the pedestrian entry court on Pier Avenue. e. Bicycle parking shall be provided in a convenient location, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 4. All parking shall be shared amongst the occupants and patrons of the buildings on site, and owned in common, which shall clearly be set forth in project CC & R's, and not parking spaces shall be assigned for exclusive use by any owner, occupant, or tenant. A limited number of spaces may signed for short term parking for delivery couriers and short-term visitors. 5. A parking management plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director, setting forth a program to ensure priority parking for the occupants/owners of the building through the use of identification /S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • stickers, or passes, or other method, and said plan shall include how the parking plan will be enforced including the signage to be posted in the parking facilities. 6. Architectural treatment of the building shall be as shown on building elevations and site and floor plans. Any modification shall require approval by the Community Development Director. 7. A detailed comprehensive sign plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director incorporating the following revisions: a. One free-standing sign is permitted, and shall be limited to a monument sign with a maximum height of ten (10) feet. b. A comprehensive sign program shall be submitted for review and all -•- individual tenant or owner signs shall be consistent -with that plan. 8. The use of the building and the individual condominium units shall be limited to office and retail commercial uses allowed in the C-2 zone, and shall not include medical or dental clinics, or any other uses subject to greater parking requirements. 9. The location and installation of wireless communication facilities are subject to submittal and approval of separate Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 17.46.240 of the Zoning Ordinance. 10. The project shall meet all requirements of the Condominium Ordinance. a. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions in compliance with the Condominium Ordinance Section 17.22.120 shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. b. Proof of recordation of approved CC & R's shall be submitted to the Community Development Director thirty (30) days after recordation of the Final Map. 11. A detailed drainage and (SUSMP) Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan is required for approval by the Public Works Department, prior to the issuance of building permits and implemented on site, demonstrating best management practices for stormwater pollution control, and for sediment control and erosion control during construction. 12. The applicant is responsible for all off-site right-of-way construction required by the Public Works Department, or alternatively, may deposit funds in amount to cover the cost for future right-of-way construction for the Pier Avenue frontage. 13. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Department. 14. Final building plans/construction drawings including site, elevation, floor plan, sections, details, signage, landscaping and irrigation, submitted for building permit issuance shall be reviewed for consistency with the plans approved by the Planning (6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • Commission and the conditions of this resolution, and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. 15. All roof equipment shall be located and designed to be screened from public view and any portion that exceeds the height limit shall not cover more than 5% of the roof area. 16. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 17. The Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. 18. Each of the above Conditions of Approval is separately enforced, and if one of the Conditions of Approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. 19. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 20. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. 21. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. Section 6. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. 7 • i Section 7. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. VOTE: AYES: Allen, Hoffman, Koenig, Pizer, Perrotte NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. No. 04-34 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regu,ar meeting of September 21, 2004. Sam Perrotti, Chairman /D--ia-v ei Date F:\B95\CD\PC\2004\09-21-04\PDPR200Pier.doc • 10. CON 04-15/PDP 04-16 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 061290 for an 18,000 -square -foot commercial building containing 54 commercial condominium units, and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration at 200 Pier Avenue. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request and adopt the Environmental Negative Declaration. Senior Planner Robertson stated that this proposed project is located in the Downtown area on the south side of Pier Avenue at its intersection with Manhattan Avenue; advised that the existing three-story building on the site is a commercial building occupied predominantly by professional offices; that it contains approximately 12,500 square feet, 42 rental units, and 44 parking spaces; and advised that this building will be demolished as part of this project. He explained that this project involves the construction of a commercial building complex containing over 18,000 square feet in four buildings, connected by a two-level parking structure; and stated that the buildings will contain 54 commercial condominium units, each one containing 333 square feet. He advised that the buildings are designed to maximize the number of commercial units with direct street frontage on Pier Avenue or Manhattan Avenue and to maximize the westerly ocean views; and explained that this will be achieved by locating the parking towards the easterly and southerly properly lines, that the commercial buildings will front on the major streets and by stepping the buildings to follow the slope to take advantage of ocean views. He stated that the project is organized in four buildings to create an office campus setting with a contemporary style, with standing seam metal roofs, smooth plaster, wood exterior finishes, exposed beams and open deck areas with decorative railings. Senior Planner Robertson stated that the project as submitted meets the basic requirements of the C-2 Zone; that a 5 -foot setback is provided adjacent to the residential property to the south; that the building is designed to comply with the 30 -foot height limit at the critical points on the roof — with one exception: the proposed exit stairs and cellular antenna locations proposed along the south property line cannot be allowed in the required 5 -foot yard. Senior Planner Robertson explained that the project plans show a substantial improvement that will help revitalize Upper Pier Avenue and a prominent location in the City's Downtown, while providing a lower profile building than the existing three-story development. He stated that the commercial uses will predominantly be professional office uses, will be compatible with surrounding uses and will be consistent with the general objectives of City Council to balance the existing restaurant and bar uses with office and retail uses. He advised that a separate conditional use permit application will have to be submitted and approved to give final approval for the wireless antennas, noting that staff does not support the proposed location within the required yard along the south properly line adjacent to residential uses. Senior Planner Robertson stated that vehicle access to the site will be from Manhattan Avenue to access the lower level of the parking garage and from the alley to access the upper level, each level containing 28 parking spaces; and noted that an existing curb cut will be eliminated on Pier Avenue, adding up to 5 metered public parking spaces. He stated that the applicant has submitted a traffic analysis which clearly indicates that the impacts of the proposed project are insignificant as compared to the current use on site; advised that the project is expected to Planning Commission Minutes September 21, 2004 • generate a net increase of 6 vehicle trips during the AM and PM peak hours and a net increase of 40 vehicle trips on a typical weekday, based upon the building occupancy; and that it further concludes that no significant traffic impacts are forecast for the nearby study intersections. He added that the proposed building requires 56 parking spaces and that the applicant is proposing to meet that parking requirement; he added that the parking will be available in common and will be shared amongst all legitimate users of the building; and added that staff is recommending no assigned parking be provided in the parking structure. He advised that the applicant submitted a parking analysis to address this issue; explained that the office condominiums will be marketed, according to this parking analysis, to sole proprietors seeking the benefits of owning versus that of leasing office space; that the assumption is there will be no medical offices; and that with an assumed 90 percent occupancy rate and 15 percent for alternate modes of transportation to these office condominiums and a visitor rate of 1 per 5 businesses, the parking analysis shows that the demand will be 53 parking spaces. He mentioned that the proposed locker room and conference room, totaling 670 square feet, will not contribute to the parking demand, but are included in the gross floor area parking calculation. Senior Planner Robertson stated that according to the developer the target market for buyers will be local residents who are sole proprietors and operate their business within the area and/or work out of their homes; but that a larger business may wish to purchase several units or an investor may purchase units to lease to start-up businesses or that the units may be sold to one entity and the building operated more in a traditional office space with centralized management. Senior Planner Robertson highlighted staff's recommendation for the following conditions of approval: 1) The location and installation of wireless communication facilities are subject to review of a conditional use permit. 2) All available parking shall be shared amongst the occupants of the building on site and owned in common, which shall clearly be set forth in project CC&R's, and no parking spaces shall be assigned for exclusive use. 3) CC&R's must be submitted for review and approval by the City. 4) A 5 -foot setback area adjacent to the residential zone shall be maintained clear from ground to sky. 5) Tree planting and accent landscaping in the pedestrian entry on Pier Avenue. 6) Provision of a minimum of 7 street trees and tree grates on the Pier Avenue frontage, or alternatively the applicant may deposit funds in an amount to cover the cost of the City doing these improvements in accordance with the Downtown Implementation Plan. 7) Provision of 4 street trees on Manhattan Avenue. 8) Decorative paving surfaces for the pedestrian entry and entries into the parking areas. 9) Provision of a decorative block wall be provided along the southerly property line adjacent to residential uses, consistent with the architecture of the building. Commissioner Hoffman asked for clarification in what type of situations a change in design would come back before the Planning Commission, such as someone who buys three units and wants to put three connecting doorways. Director Blumenfeld stated that in that case, the matter would be referred to the Commission for consideration per the resolution. ao Planning Commission Minutes September 21, 2004 • • Chairman Perrotti asked that appropriate street trees be planted, highlighting the work done by the Public Works Department and the task force. Vice -Chairman Pizer noted his concern that there is not enough parking for this number of units. Director Blumenfeld explained that the parking analysis assumed the number of visitors per unit when the project has a maximum occupancy of 90 percent. This is the peak occupancy period in the study; and pointed out that the City approved a new parking . standard of 1 space per 333 square feet, consistent with one space per unit on the plans. He further stated that the City is trying to encourage office development in the Downtown area and explained that by not assigning the parking, the maximum utility of the parking area can be achieved; and that based on the parking analysis and the City's desire to attract office/retail developments in the Downtown area and based on the City's parking requirement in the Downtown area, he stated that this project is commensurate with the City's goals. Addressing Commissioner Koenig's concern with the possibility of a VCR television repair business going into this complex, Director Blumenfeld explained that a number of different uses may occupy the building with the exception of medical office which has a higher parking demand; and stated that as long as a business has a parking demand consistent with office or retail, it will not exceed the required parking for the project. Senior Planner Robertson noted for Commissioner Koenig that some of the frontage units on Pier Avenue might lend themselves to a retail operation, which would be acceptable, but the intent is for most of the building to be office uses; and added that if the use is consistent with the same parking requirement as the office uses, it doesn't matter. He clarified that the CC&R's would reflect no medical office uses. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing. Bill Growdon, project architect, provided a power point presentation highlighting the project design, elevations, and parking areas. He pointed out that this project is gaining five street parking spaces; and noted his hope that many of the owners will be walking or riding a bike to work. He asked that the conditions be flexible enough to accommodate future needs of tenants and changing trends and asked that assigned parking be permitted. Mr. Growdon stated that there will be bicycle parking at the front location. Vice -Chairman Pizer expressed his pleasure with the design/concept of this project. Mr. Growdon noted for Commissioner Koenig that each unit will have a toilet and sink; and stated that there are common restrooms on each floor. Addressing Chairman Perrotti's inquiry regarding the location of the wireless antennas, Mr. Growdon stated that the alternate location for the wireless antennas will have to be worked out with the wireless companies; and he added that these locations will be properly screened from view. 21 Planning Commission Minutes September 21, 2004 • • Nick Schaar, 800 Manhattan Beach Boulevard, project developer, commented on the parking analysis and the anticipated vacancy rate and expressed his belief that the 90 percent figure in the studies is a good estimate. He urged the Commission to allow for assigned parking, believing that it will have a negative impact upon the unit owners. Bob Dunn, 1052 Bayview Drive, neighbor across the street from this project, asked that the side facing his house from the alley be more aesthetically pleasing than what currently exists; addressed his concern with the traffic from Manhattan and Pier Avenues and the limited parking in this area. Dean Micholus, 1158 Manhattan Avenue, neighbor adjacent to the proposed project, noted his concern with limited parking in this area; asked that the elevation which faces his house be visually pleasing; expressed his belief that the design is too industrial for this area; and urged the Planning Commission to be sensitive to the neighbors' concerns. James Patterson, 1068 Bayview Drive, addressed his concerns with the limited parking in this area; expressed his belief that this project does not have adequate parking; and urged the Planning Commission to increase the parking requirements to 1.5 spaces per unit. Jim Rosenberger, 1121 Bayview Drive, owner of one of the new structures built on this alley/street, stated that more parking is needed with this project; and he noted his support for assigned parking to deter parking abuses. Carla Merriman, Executive Director of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, noted her support for this project and noted her support for assigned parking or to designate space for their customers; and stated that the City should separately address the shortage of parking throughout the City. Mr. Dunn asked for input on where the trash will be stored. Mr. Growdon noted for Mr. Dunn that the trash will be maintained in the parking structure until the day of trash pickup; explained that the back of the building has been beautifully designed; and pointed out that this project is providing more on -street parking spaces. He explained that planters will line the back elevation, along with a fabric mesh that will eventually be covered with greenery that will block the view to the parking structure. Chairman Perrotti questioned if this parking will be secured in the evening. Mr. Schaar noted that there will be no parking access at night and that the site will be enclosed with some type of security gating. He added that this is a daytime use. Commissioner Koenig stated that "No parking" signage should be posted for those who aren't part of this complex. Chairman Perrotti suggested that a parking sticker be utilized for the tenants. 7 2 - Planning Commission Minutes September 21, 2004 • • There being no further input, Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. In response to the concerns with the adequacy of parking, Director Blumenfeld explained that City Council approved this parking requirement over the last 12 months, that it was deemed to be appropriate to the downtown; that this use has been encouraged by City Council and that it meets the parking standards. He explained that staff recommends that parking is not assigned because it will have less utility in that parking area; and stated that the question is whether the parking can be managed to accommodate the number of users to meet the code requirement and added that it is up to the building's management to make sure the parking is being properly utilized. He reiterated that staff believes the only way to adequately manage this parking is to not assign any spaces. Commissioner Allen complimented the applicant on this project; and stated that he would support no assigned parking but that some type of parking identification should be implemented. Commissioner Koenig noted his support not to assign parking; suggested that parking stickers be utilized and also suggested that restrictive parking signs be posted on site to deter illegal parking. Vice -Chairman Pizer stated that he would prefer assigned parking. Commissioner Hoffman stated that the proposed building will enhance this area; and commented on the established parking requirements for this facility. Chairman Perrotti commented on the recent change to the parking criteria to increase office and retail use and noted that the applicant has followed this criteria. MOTION by Commissioner Allen to APPROVE CON 04-15/PDP 04-16 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 061290 for an 18,000 - square -foot commercial building containing 54 commercial condominium units, and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration at 200 Pier Avenue. Director Blumenfeld noted the following proposed changes to the resolution: Condition 2C, eliminate split -face concrete masonry from the condition and replace it with decorative block wall; include "The development and continued use of the property shall be substantially consistent with the submitted plans as reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting of September 21, 2004, incorporating all revisions as required by the conditions below. Any major modifications, including changes in the layout of the condominium units, shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission"; and minor modifications may be approved by the Director but shall not be final until confirmed by the Planning Commission as a Consent Calendar item on the Commission agenda following the Director's determination. He suggested the submittal of a parking management plan that could include parking signage and to provide some method to ensure the tenants have parking on site, either through a parking sticker or plaque. Commissioner Allen noted his concurrence with the changes to the resolution. Vice -Chairman Plarming Commission Minutes a 3 September 21, 2004 Pizer seconded the motion. The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Allen, Hoffman, Koenig, Pizer, Perrotti None None None CESS AND RECONVENE Chai . Perrotti recessed the meeting at 9:40 P.M. and reconvened the meeting at 9:49 11. L-5 - Determination of the legality on whether four dwelling unit nonco orming at 67 18th Street. Staff Recommend kitchen. Action: To determine that the fourth unit is legal Senior Planner Robertson one -bedroom units and a de stated that the one -bedroom um unit building was constructed in three units and a bachelor; and no definition for bachelor unit, but it appe with kitchens and one unit without a kitch add a kitchen to the fourth unit, which was tated that the subject property is a two -s ched three -car garage that is access are between 582 and 630 squar 54 in accordance with a b d that the Municipal the intention of , which is 'thdra that a kitchen had been installed and requir removed, and the case was closed. He noted application or approval for a kitchen in the b that a residential building report from 1 5 violations." at el indic are legal may contain a ry building containing 4 from the alley to the rear; feet each; advised that the 4 - ding permit that was issued for ode in 1954 did not contain any e original permit was for three units erscored by a 1956 variance request to , and stated that in 1961, the City found removal of the kitchen sink, which was no other City records show any permit unit, assumed to be Unit 71A; and added es four units and states "no building In summary, Senior Planner Roberts. stated that there reall 's no dispute as to the number of units on the property, as the City d : issue a permit for four units, hat the only issue in dispute is the intent of the three units and .. achelor, whether or not that bach or was to exclude a kitchen; and stated that it should be co .idered whether the exclusion of a kitch really serves any public purpose since the City o erwise authorized the construction and . ubsequent rental and occupancy of the unit for . separate tenant. He advised that the applicant . submitted records to show how the prop - has been used for the last 30 years; that all the ev . ence does reflect there has been a kitc • en; and that it has been rented as a separate unit. Since the bachelor is not connected to the is that have a kitchen, he stated that it could be argued thimpacts on parking, densit . d other considerations are no different with or without a kitchen. Without a clear and su.. orting definition that distinguishes a bachelor unit from a dwelling um . or that does not al . w a kitchen in a bachelor unit, he stated there is a record of continuous use . four units an• ere does not appear to be a practical reason to exclude a kitchen from the fourth t, and th staff is recommending granting this legal determination and allowing the continued us as a • it with a kitchen. Planning Commission Minutes September 21, 2004 • BACKGROUND MATERIAL a 9 0 .10.041171 L 0 u 6I r a 0 4187- oo6 J I AQO 1 op ...to 32. k i II o LI4 ri XI Q1. 4" I O or '791b.174i • W 1^11Vd orz, 9 0* f1 CPt 0 0* i 0e r S: f1 I fly MANHATT N v1 N tT BAY VI 4187-006 4i 91 -009 AVE O N A '3AV OD z`� O's•p1• os 18 - p{' or , OD OD �� CoA z ' • $ 61 91 Z, 'EZ LI 91 COLO SI • I elf G. �� OD OD ! Of " or OP D Iow N V+ Oo$ti0t, tr 4,4 NINO N h ‘35% i3AV O`: Pp. OOP xv �. t OP ..Q —� ..407.1 .sZc AVE. WF V 0 !!N 00 9"FP' 9 w /!9 MONTEREY o b o 95 OP • • W. /4t�looct E 4197- on. 0 4191- oil 00 1 '119 I p. 9 1/ i I. /r 1 8 Aos OF 6 0 0 sirs BLVD.= sirs zI CI ores O Cr' e 9 h D'i'e _Tr. s or 13SNf1Sc 1 K __ I 13SNfS kw*. i 901 u:1 7� QA1 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: PDP 04-16, CON04-15; VTTM #06290 Construction of an 18,000 square foot commercial building for office and retail uses containing 54 commercial condominiums. Demolition of the existing 12,500 square foot office/retail building located on the property. 2. Project Location: 200 Pier Avenue 3. Project Sponsor: Nick Schaar 800 Manhattan Beach Blvd Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 4. Lead Agency : City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 5. Contact Person: Ken Robertson, Senior Planner - (310) 318-0242 6. General Plan Designation: General Commercial 7. Zoning: C-2 8. Description of Project: To construct a commercial building complex, with approximately 18,000 square feet in three buildings connected by a central parking structure, and containing 54- commercial condominium units of approximately 340 square foot each. The site currently contains a 12,500 square foot office building with a few retail tenants. All existing structures are proposed to be demolished. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: Commercial uses are located to the east and west, and across Pier Avenue to the north. High density residential uses are located to the south, containing a mix of multi- family projects. Pier Avenue is a downtown pedestrian -friendly commercial district located in an urban setting, consisting of restaurants, shops, and some offices. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Geological Problems ❑ Energy and Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Water and Water Quality El Hazards El Cultural Resources ❑ Air Quality El Noise El Recreation ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, that there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environmental, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. / gnature Date g'&104 e -V1 i� beriG n StatCf CnV TQApe,w�evtnw� i t+ c Printed Name For El Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low income or minority community)? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ Cl ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ I -a thru e: The project site is deisgnated General Commercial and zoned C-2 Restricted Commercial. The proposed use is a permitted use in the zone, consistent with the General Plan designation, and will be a compatible commercial use with other uses along Pier Avenue. Sources: City of Hermosa Beach General Plan, City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructures? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ Iia -c The project will replace an existing commercial use with a slightly larger commercial use, which will in include commercial condominium use — thereby resulting in no impact on population and housing. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? b) Seismic ground shaking? c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? e) Landslides or mudflows? f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? h) Expansive soil? I) Unique geologic or physical features? P Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ III -a There are no known fault lines in the City and the locations of past epicenters do not indicate the presence of fault areas in Hermosa Beach.. III -b During the life of the project it may be subject to a major earthquake, which may cause damage to the proposed residential dwellings and present a hazard to residents. Existing Building regulations such as the UBC address these seismic hazards, and City review of construction plans for compliance with all applicable regulations is considered adequate to reduce risks to less -than -significant. III -c The site has not been surveyed for susceptibility to seismically induce hazards such as liquefaction. Geotechnical studies required as part of the development review process will address these potential hazards. It is expected the such hazards will be adequately addressed through compliance with the UBC and through implementation of the recommendations set forth in required geotechnical studies. III -d There is no potential for either seats or volcanic activity, or a tsunami at the subject site. III -e The project site is in a developed area which is characterized by low topographic relief Landslides and mudflows are thus not considered to be hazards in the project area. Z9 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 111-fThe project will involve grading, excavation, and filling which could result in erosion or unstable soil • conditions. Geotechnical studies required as part of the plan review process would address the potential for erosion or unstable soil conditions and would include measures to reduce or eliminate these hazards. III g Subsidence as well as other potential geotechnical hazards will be evaluated and addressed by geotechnical studies required as part of the plan review process. It is expected that any such hazards can be addressed through routine engineering design employed in the area. III -h The potential for encountering expansive soils at the project site is considered to be low, as sandy soils, such as those characterizing the project area, are not considered expansive. III -i The project site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Sources: City or Hermosa Beach General Plan, Seismic Safety Element U.S. Geological Service Map, Redondo Beach Quadrangle 7.5 Minute Series (Topography) IV. WATER AND WATER QUALITY. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? f) Storm water system discharges from areas for materials storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage delivery or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? g) A significantly harmful increase in the flow rate or volume of storm water runoff? 3c ❑ ❑ ❑ Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): °Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact h) i) j•) k) A significantly harmful increase in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? Storm water discharges that would significantly impair the beneficial uses of receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefits (e.g. riparian corridors, wetland, etc.)? Harm to the biological integrity of drainage systems and water bodies? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? 1) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? m) Impacts to groundwater quality? n) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ IV -a The proposed project will cover a significant portion of the subject property with impervious surfaces, as is currently the situation with the existing use and only change the pattern and negligibly change the amount of runoff The project, however, is considered a priority project as it is a redevelopment project with over 5,000 square feet of impervious surface, and therefore a SUSMP (Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan) will be required, and minimum best management practices for sediment control and erosion control will be required during construction. These requirements will further mitigate any potential impacts on water quality. IV -b -n There are no impacts anticipated to these items V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any chance in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? '31 0 El CI CI Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): ( •Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact V -a The proposed will result in the generation of mobile source emissions from the traffic expected. Since the number of vehicle trips expected from the proposed use is expected to be only slightly greater than the existing trips from the site no impacts on air quality is expected. V -b No impacts anticipated V -c No potential exists to alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate. V -d The project is not expected to result in the generation of objectionable odors. VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp ❑ ❑ ❑ El curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El VI -a The timing, volume, and pattern of vehicle trips will be altered, but pursuant to the attached study prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan the proposed use will generate an insignificant increase in trips than the existing use of the property, and thus will not have any significant adverse impact on nearby streets and intersections. VI -b No significant changes in traffic patterns are expected that would impact safety or create traffic hazards. VI -c Emergency access would be available to the site.. VI -d On site parking is provided to comply with the City parking requirements for retail and office uses located in the downtown district. The attached study from Linscott, Law and Greenspan confirms that parking will be adequate based and also evaluates the parking impacts of the commercial condominiums, and finds that the proposed parking will be adequate, and also notes that the revised locations for accessing the parking will create 4 additional on -street public spaces on Pier Avenue. 32 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact VI -f The proposed project would be designed to comply with any applicable policies supporting alternative transportation. VI -g The proposed project would not effect rail, waterborne, or air traffic. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats ❑ ❑ ❑ El (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees) ? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Locally designed natural communities (e.g. oak forest, ❑ ❑ ❑ El coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? ❑ ❑ ❑ El e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 ❑ El VII -a -e The project site is located in an urban setting, and contains negligible vegetation or habitats for any flora or fauna, and the proposed project would not cause any adverse impacts to biological resources. VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful an inefficient manner? c) Results in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the and the residents of the state? O ❑ 0 El O 0 ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ VIII -a The proposed project would be required to be constructed to comply with energy conservation standards in the State's Uniform Building Code. VIII -b The size of the project and the nature of the use will involve significant or wasteful use of non-renewable resources. Application of the existing regulations are considered adequate to ensure that non-renewable resources would not be used in an inefficient or wasteful manner. 33 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact VIII -c There have been no significant amount of mineral deposits identified at this site, or in the City of Hermosa Beach. Should there be potential for encountering sub -surface oil deposits, development of the site with residential uses would not preclude or significantly effect future exploitation of these resources if it was desired. Source: City of Hermosa Beach General Plan, Conservation Element IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ❑ ❑ ❑ IZI IX -a Construction of the project may involve the use of diesel oil, and pesticides on landscaping. The use of these substances is typical of most construction projects and the risk of accidental explosion or release is considered negligible. IX -b The size and location of the project would not interfere with City-wide emergency response and evacuation plans.. IX -c No anticipated impact. IX -d The is no anticipated exposure to existing health hazards other than noted above.. IX -e The area is not characterized by existing flammable brush, grass, or trees, and the project would be constructed in compliance with fire safety standards. X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 34- Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): •Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X -a The proposed project is expected only to negligibly affect the pattern and volume of existing noise levels. Construction noise will temporarily impact noise levels, typical for a project of this size and scale which is not considered significant. X -b No impact anticipated. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e) Other governmental services? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ XI -a -e The increase in commercial floor area will marginally change the need for all these services. This is considered to be less than significant, as most of these services are already necessary for the operation of the commercial business in the area, and the marginal changes, should be easily accommodated by existing resources and facilities that area already available in this highly urbanized area. These impacts are also partially mitigated by various City required fees imposed on new construction, and the taxes that will be generated from this project, which contribute towards the continued provision of these services. XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste disposal? 3S • Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): 1 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact g) Local or regional water supplies? XII -a -g The increase in commercial square footage will marginally change the total demand and the pattern of demand of all these utilities and service systems. This is considered to be less than significant, as these utilities and service systems are already necessary for the operation of the commercial business in the surrounding area, and the marginal changes, such as need for more phone lines, possible increases in sewer use and solid waste generation should be accommodated by existing utility and service systems that are already available in this highly urbanized area. These impacts are also partially mitigated by various City required fees imposed on new construction, and the taxes that will be generated from this project which contribute towards maintenance and upgrading of these systems-. XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c) Create light or glare? XIII -a -b No impacts anticipated. ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ® ❑ XIII -c The development may introduce new sources of light in the area, and change the pattern of lighting. This is not expected to be significant. XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? •._ c) Affect historical resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 IZ XIV -a -e there are no known cultural resources associate with this project site. XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: 3 l� Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ❑ D ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ XV -a No increased demand anticipated given the proposed commercial use. XV -b The proposed project will not impact any existing recreational opportunities. XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods`of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? • ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 El ❑ 0 0 El a) Supporting Information Sources. (The following are sources used and referred to in the initial study, and are incorporated herein by reference. All are available for review in the Community Development Department, Planning Division of the City of Hermosa Beach) 3� Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): . Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach (Land Use Element revised 1994) 2. City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 3. Preliminary project plans and traffic/parking analysis submitted by the applicant c:ckltl55pch 3$ Type or Print Legibly Date Filed • NATURAL RESOURCES (State Designated Form) ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Tobe. completed by applicant) nEcEivr.ri 3 N 2 3 2064 COM. DEV. DEPT GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: 6c -1(-454.-(2- g 2 8 0 0 tik g ado .20 9- t 1A r 6 -N j e A -ct oaS 2. Address of Project: 20 o ek &w' 3. Name, address, and telephone. number of person to be. contacted concerning this project: N kyL lG 5c41AP 500 i1g wn . 47 k./3. o� ci3-T - si () I Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: I List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for thiI project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: C--0Alikt- Cr-IAA1 S S L./ Existing zoning district: C 7.. Proposed use of site (Protect for which this form is filed): (vtdj Imo- Gd tap a PROJECT DESCRIPTION 8. Site size: t- 5 1 S F 9Square footage: ' o ( 4' S S� 10. Number of floors of construction: 2 51:6 E f o J&% 2 >'E E 1--5 or -PA(4K 1 a G 11. . Amount of off-street parking provided } S AS 12. Attach plans. Proposed scheduling: (t -k• 01-(4-5 ett- C° OP -le 00 . 14. Associated projects: 0–* 15. Anticipated incremental development: 16. If residential, include the number of InlitS, schedule of unit sizes, and type of household size expected: ( 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally orientated square footage of sales area; and loading facilities: VE (c04424-0-0 D I g. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: — 19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, 1.1 loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: 20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: CoKsD1 11 • ,34.,C 6 Pet- CAI 00 0 eit-o()0S t -f) • Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO ir 21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills OT substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. • Change in scenic yiews or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 23. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 25.. Cbmgc indust. as staok, Daus Qr Qdors it_ vkinity. 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 4-0 • / /27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. 10., Use or disposal or potentially hazardous thaterials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, ete.). 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, -natural gasi etc.). 32. Relationship ta a larger project or series. af projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe atty existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or I • polaroid photos will be accepted. I'-- Xk r awn gl v.0( k COE9 ef-f) ( o oFfi cols() o_ -Ai I- F ot • ek,t't LD, 96e -r r• 11,4-& S‘ tY-L,ICANJ 4-CS-r)ttic -re, 34. Describe the sum:mm.4 properues, incuicurig information on plants and animals and any cultural, histOrical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc), intensity of laird use avartmetit houses, &hop, dortrtnient StoreS, ate.). Attacli pliatagrapIS of the .viCinity. . Snapshotsor polaroid photos will be accepted. CERTIFICATION'. I lierebY c&hl5r that the statemthi Tumishid ib�vc and in the attached eifluHbits present e data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the faCtS,.staternentsi and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge 1,itti belief Si hciitr Cited: Sections 21803 and 21807, Futile Resources Code. Reference :Sections 21000-21176, Public Resources Code (4- f:b95\cd\oplicatenVckliA 200 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach Environmental Setting June 23rd, 2004 • • 200 Pier Ave Description • Originally designed as a hotel in the early 1960's. g Y g Current usage is for commercial office space (zoning H BC2YY ) • Building square footage is 12,240sgft • Lot size is 17,559 sqft. • Th e property has potential ocean views that the current p p Y building it's does not take advantage of in current form • 200 Pier is in the heart of the revitalized downtown business district. The current structure does not fit in with the city's new image as a cultural center in the South Bay Land Usage to the North • 'Properties to the north of 200 Pier are primarily retail including a restaurant/bar, drive thru mini -mart, health spa and retail shops • There is high density residential units within a block of the subject property • Pier Avenue, a busy two lane street separates the subject property from properties to the north Land Usage to the South • Properties to the south of 200 Pier are primarily high density residential properties including many apartments and condominiums • To the southwest is retail space including restaurants and shops • Pier Avenue is adjacent to a rental property and is separated from the retail properties by Manhattan Ave. i • Land Usage to the West • Properties to the west of 200 Pier are primarily retail space including restaurants, shops and the Hermosa Promenade • 200 Pier is separated from the retail properties by Manhattan Ave and Pier Ave. Land Usage to the East • Properties to the East of 200 Pier are a mixture of retail space and high density residential • 200 Pier is separated from the eastern properties by an alley. There is a vacant house formerly used as a -F retail space on the corner -43 • There are apartment buildings opposite the subject property on the alley • )mimunity Development Department anning Division ity of Hermosa Beach 315 Valley Drive ermosa Beach, CA 90254 IIPORTANT PUBLIC NOTICE 00 PIER AVENUE • FM \ 9 sLa 61 OCCUPANT 318 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH CA 90254 rrI III t1II I i1 I I1irlirr!lrtliIII 1 I t I III IIrII II► RECEIV*p SEP 132004 "� COM. DEV. DEPT. 10 . is (O016 N s p€St A WV -7)A 1 i K11 &)12._)-\ op , U3E. (iii=. -(0\--7/ (v1 oYZ COliv\ w\ O- C I A-. "i%`' �� - 11.(Z CTN1 TO v\ � ) ? 5\v okA October 14, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of October 26, 2004 REQUEST TO RECONSIDER OBJECTION TO DANCING AT TJ CHARLYZ Recommendation: That the City Council consider the attached letter requesting reconsideration your action of May 25, 2004 which was to write a letter to ABC objecting to a change in the ABC license to allow dancing at TJ Charlyz. Background: TJ Charlyz has submitted a letter asking the City Council to reconsider its decision to file a letter of objection to the ABC license amendment to allow dancing at this business. Copies of the letter of objection, the May 25, 2004 staff report, minutes, and a memo from the Police Chief are attached for your information on the request. The memo from the Police Chief basically states that the problems and concerns that came from this business have been greatly reduced since they have discontinued dancing. This seems to indicate that at least some of the problems that had been observed at the business were associated with dancing. The Police Chief feels that it is likely thaf with the reintroduction of dancing that we will see the problems again. This is a concern because once the ABC license is granted it is very difficult to have the license changed to prohibit dancing. The concerns that the Police Department expressed in May have been addressed and the business is operating now without any particular problems. Staff, appreciates the efforts made by the business owner, but feels that with the addition of dancing we will see a return of the problems and therefore recommends that the,City Council not consider withdrawing the objection filed as the result of the City Council action on May 25, 2004. Respectfully submitted, of 11' Stephen R. Burrel City Manager 6a • • Richard D. Warren Attorney at Law BY FACSIMILE AND MAIL September 27, 2004 Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 929 Fresno Avenue, Berkeley CA 94707 Tel 510.528.4423 Fax 510.528.1123 rickwarren@pacbell.net RECEIVED SEP 2 8 2004 Per RE: Steve Dandah T J Charlyz 1332 Hermosa Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 REQUEST TO RECONSIDER OBJECTION TO DANCING AT T J CHARLYZ Dear Mr. Burrell: T J Charlyz and its owner, Steve Dandah, request that the Hermosa Beach City Council reconsider its decision at the May 25, 2004 meeting to object to removing the "no dancing" condition on T J Charlyz' ABC license. For the reasons stated below, we request that the City Council reply to the ABC that it does not object to dancing at T J Charlyz. Mr. Dandah and I understand that the City's reason for objecting to removing the prohibition on dancing was not related to any objection to dancing itself. Instead, you and Chief Levin expressed concerns about the overall operation of T J Charlyz and the type of clientele it was attracting. Working cooperatively over the past three months with you and the police department, the problems at T J Charlyz have gone away. The ABC has, at our request, kept its action on hold to see if we could satisfy the City that T J Charlyz' operations are no ionger a problem and that the City would remove its objection to eliminating the "no dancing" condition on the ABC license. Because the operational concerns no longer exist, T J Charlyz should be permitted to have dancing the same as many other restaurants in the neighborhood. BACKGROUND In 1996, when T J Charlyz was licensed by the ABC the ABC insisted that T J Charlyz agree to a condition prohibiting dancing.' In the spring, when T J Charlyz was under intense police scrutiny because of other problems related to its clientele, it was cited for permitting dancing. Mr. Dandah then petitioned the ABC to remove the condition that prohibited dancing. The ABC requested that the City respond whether it objected to permitting dancing at T J Charlyz. ' Condition 5 states: "There will be no dancing allowed on the premises." a • • Steve Burrell, City Manager September 27, 2004 Page 2 That prompted you and Chief Levin to issue a report on May 20, 2004 recommending that the City object to dropping the "no dancing" condition. In that report, it was stated that: "While the Police Department is not opposed to dancing in general, the Police Department is concerned about the daily operation of this particular nightclub considering its past." At its meeting on May 25th, the City Council accepted your recommendation and voted to request that the ABC deny the request to drop the "no dancing" condition. Immediately afterwards, Mr. Dandah engaged me and I called you to invite a meeting to address the City's larger concerns about the operation of T J Charlyz. On June 10, 2004, Mr. Dandah and I met with you, Chief Levin and several patrol officers to discuss what T J Charlyz could do to alleviate the problems the police reported. We developed a detailed list of steps that T J Charlyz would take. T J Charlyz immediately implemented all of the policies and procedures agreed upon. A different relationship of trust, communication and responsiveness has evolved over the past three months and is now established. Since our meeting in June, T J Charlyz acted with resolve to eliminate the problems identified by the City and they have gone away. When we met on June 10th, we agreed that if T J Charlyz could turn things around in three months so it was no longer a problem for the police, then it would be permitted to ask that the City'reconsider its objection to permitting dancing. The ABC has agreed to defer its decision on the petition to eliminate the "no dancing" restriction to see if we could accomplish that. We have done so. Therefore, we request that the City Council reconsider its decision, and now vote that it does not oppose dancing at T J Charlyz. CONCLUSION We ask that this request be placed on the City Council's agenda as soon as possible. We also request that you and Chief Levin report to the Council that the concerns identified in your May 20th report have been resolved, and that you and the police department no longer recommend objection to deleting the prohibition on dancing at T J Charlyz. Please let me know if you, Chief Levin or any members of the City Council have any questions. I look forward to hearing from you. Many thanks for your cooperation in this Richard D. Warren May 27, 2004 • • City of 2lermosa 73eacL' Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Ms. Phillis J. Crippen, District Administrator Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Inglewood District Office 1 Manchester Blvd. P.O. Box 6500 Inglewood, California 90306 Dear Ms. Crippen: The Hermosa Beach City Council, at its meeting of May 25, 2004, reviewed your letter of May 4, 2004 concerning the application filed to TJ Charlyz to amended its ABC license to permit dancing. The City Council received a report from the Police Chief regarding the ABC license application and, following review of the information, unanimously voted to request that the ABC deny the application to allow dancing at TJ Charlyz. If I can be of further assistance or answer any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me Monday through Thursday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. at (310) 318-0216 or by email at sburrell@hermosabch.org. Sincerely, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager SRB:rem APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN RELATION THERETO." Motion Reviczky, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. The meeting recessed at 8:38 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:50 p.m., with item 6(a). 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL CONCERNING TJ CHARLYZ (1332 HERMOSA AVENUE) REQUEST TO ADD DANCING TO THEIR LICENSE. Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin dated May 17, 2004. Supplemental information, P.C. Resolution No. 03-14 was received on May 25, 2004. Police Chief Lavin presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To recommend to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control the rejection of the application by TJ Charlyz Nightclub and Restaurant to change their existing alcohol license to allow dancing in their establishment. Motion Reviczky, second Keegan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. b. DEPLOYMENT OF POLICE PERSONNEL FOR THE FOURTH OF JULY HOLIDAY. Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin dated May 17, 2004. Police Chief Lavin presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file the report. Motion Reviczky, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. c. AWARD OF BID OF THE WIFI HERMOSA BEACH PROJECT; REPORT OF BIDS; REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 20, 2004. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Mayor Yoon recused himself and left the dais due to a potential conflict of interest since his employer is a provider of high-speed internet. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: City Council Minutes 05-25-04 Page 11411 Wednesday, October 06, 2004 TO: Stephen Burrell, City Manager FROM: Michael Lavin, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Modification of ABC License for TJ Charlyz (1332 Hermosa Avenue) At its regular meeting of May 25, 2004 the City Council voted to make a recommendation to the Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) to reject the application by TJ Charlyz Nightclub and Restaurant to change their existing alcohol license to allow dancing in their establishment I have attached the original agenda item from that meeting regarding this matter. It was the position of the police department at that time that such a negative recommendation be rendered. The police department was experiencing several problems at this nightclub and it was felt that the dancing that was occurring was contributing to the problem. TJ Charlyz obtained their alcohol license in 1996. One of the conditions of their license was that there was to be no dancing. It was during the beginning months of this year that TJ Charlyz began allowing dancing, a violation of their alcohol license. It was at this same time that our officers began experiencing numerous problems with TJ Charlyz as outlined in the agenda item from last May. Since the May 25 meeting, TJ Charlyz has not had dancing. As anticipated, the problems associated with TJ Charlyz subsided. In fact, TJ Charlyz is no longer a problem for our officers. Since June 1 of this year there has been a total of 25 calls associated with TJ Charlyz however of that number, there were only 3 disturbance calls. I understand that Mr. Dandah would like the City Council to reconsider its position on this matter. In speaking with the members of my staff, the consensus has not changed. It is felt strongly that if dancing were allowed at TJ Charlyz, the problems that we encountered at the beginning of the year will simply start up once again. When the dancing was stopped, the problems that required so many police responses stopped. Why would we support a change at this time that will restart the same problems once again? The police department has no reason to believe that Mr. Dandah would operate any differently if dancing were permitted. Respectfully submitted. Michael Lavin,f of Police • • May 20, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council May 25, 2004 RECOMMENDATION TO DENY DANCING AT TJ CHARLYZ (1332 HERMOSA AVENUE) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council: 1. Make a recommendation to the Department of the Alcoholic Beverage Control to reject the application by TJ Charlyz Nightclub and Restaurant to change their existing alcohol license to allow dancing in their establishment. BACKGROUND TJ Charlyz Nightclub and Restaurant at 1332 Hermosa Avenue was issued a type 47 alcohol license by the ABC in December of 1996. One of the conditions of the license (condition #5) was no dancing allowed on the premises. Recently, officials of the ABC working with members of the Hermosa Beach Police Department observed that TJ Charlyz was allowing dancing in their establishment. The owner, Mr. Steve Dandah, was advised by the ABC of the violation of this condition. During April of 2004, Mr. Dandah applied to the ABC to modify his alcohol license to allow dancing in his establishment. The ABC has formally notified the City of this request to change the license and the City has the opportunity to file a written objection to the modification of this license if it so desires. The Police Department objects to the change in Mr. Dandah's alcohol license. ANALYSIS The Police Department has become very concerned with the operations of the nightclub TJ Charlyz. Long before the police department became aware that TJ Charlyz was prohibited from having dancing, our officers have become very concerned about the rowdy behavior at this business. Officers have encountered a number of confrontational patrons. As a result our police officers have had to deal with a number of situations at this establishment. Recently on March 27, 2004 a large fight broke out at TJ's and a crowd of about 100 persons were dispersed from the area of the bar. Our officers have found and cited persons under the age of 21 drinking inside of the business. The police department has also received information from neighboring police departments regarding gang members patronizing this nightclub. The owner has expressed concern to our officers about the difficulty of his business competing with the other popular bars and nightclubs of the downtown area. Our foot patrol officers must make a point to monitor activities inside of this particular nightclub because of the rowdy behavior. This is not the case at other adjacent nightclubs such as the Cafe' Boogaloo and Sharks Cove where a more noticeably different and well- behaved clientele patronize these businesses. 6a • • The applicant has been aware of the fact that he was not to have dancing since 1996. However, our officers can attest to the fact that there has been dancing at TJ Charlyz for the past few months. Even after TJ Charlyz was informed of the fact that they could not have dancing, dancing continued. Our officers observed dancing inside TJ's over the weekend of May 15-16, 2004. This is an example of the applicant's disregard to the conditions imposed by his alcohol license. • While the Police Department is not opposed to dancing in general, the Police Department is concerned about the daily operation of this particular nightclub considering its past. It is felt that if the applicant is allowed to have dancing in the establishment, the same type of rowdy crowd will continue to show up as patrons. Therefore, the Police Department objects to changing this condition in this alcohol license. Respectfully submitted, G/2rlr MICHAEL CHIEF OF POLICE 's EPHEN BURRELL HERMOSA : H POLICE DEPARTMENT Concur: CITY MANAGER I TO: STEVE BURRELL, CITY MANAGER I FROM: SOL BLUMENFEL CTOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: CUP AND MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE AT TJ CHARLYZ, OCTOBER 2, 2004 DATE: 10/07/2004 On October 2, 2004, Bob Rollins, Code Enforcement Officer, accompanied by Sgt. Paul Wolcott, conducted observations along Pier Plaza and Hermosa Avenue. At TJ Charlyz, 1332 Hermosa Avenue, a live band was playing loudly, and the doors and windows of the establishment were open. CUP conformance was checked relative to closing of doors and windows during live entertainment. Per PC Resolution 03-14, (copy attached) Conditions of Approval, item 6 c, the exterior doors and windows shall remain closed during live entertainment. P.C. RESOLUTION 03-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS AMENDED TO RECONFIGURE THE FLOOR PLAN, TO ALLOW OUTDOOR SEATING IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, AT 1332 HERMOSA AVENUE, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 10, 11 & 12, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH TRACT Section 1. An application was filed by Dustin Gregg seeking an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor seating in conjunction with an existing restaurant with on - sale general alcohol and live entertainment. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit on March 18, 2003, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The original C.U.P. granted in 1983, permitted on -sale beer and wine in conjunction with a restaurant. At the February 13, 1996 meeting, the City Council approved a C.U.P. amendment to allow on -sale general alcohol and live entertainment in conjunction with the existing restaurant. The proposed amendment does not alter the existing and approved primary use as a restaurant with on -sale general alcohol and live entertainment. 2. The site is located in the downtown district, which has several similar restaurants with on -sale general alcohol; 3. The site is zoned C-2 allowing the existing on -sale alcohol use with a Conditional Use Permit. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit: 1. The site is zoned C-2, and the continued operation of the restaurant with the proposed modifications is suitable for the proposed location. 2. The imposition of conditions as required by this resolution to address noise and nuisance concerns will mitigate any negative impacts on, and will improve its compatibility with, nearby residential or commercial properties within the downtown district; 3. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15323, Class 23 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Normal operations of existing facilities for public gatherings for which the facilities were designed, where there is a past history of the facility being used for the same kind of purpose. • • Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the requested amendments to the Conditional. Use Permit and Precise Development Plan, subject to the following Conditions of Approval, which supersede the conditions contained in C.C. Resolution 96-5789: 1. Interior and exterior building alterations and the continued use and operation of the restaurant shall be substantially consistent with the plans submitted and reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 18, 2003. A. The outdoor railing shall be redesigned to create a cue along the south side of the building. 2. The hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00 A.M. and 2:00 A.M. daily. Outdoo dining, seating and any use of the outdoor patio area shall not be allowed later than 11:0 PM. No patrons shall be seated on the patios beginning an hour before these times. 3. The hours for live entertainment shall be limited to the hours between 4:00 PM to 1:15 A Monday through Friday, and from 9:00 AM to 1:15 AM on Saturdays and Sundays Federal and State holidays, Cinco De Mayo and St. Patrick's day. 4. Live entertainment shall be limited to the interior dining room only. 5. A code complying seating plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior t issuance of building permits. 6. An acoustical study shall be prepared by an acoustical engineer, including proposed soun dampening features to baffle and direct sound away from the entrance/exit and windo areas to ensure compliance with the noise ordinance. Said study and sound dampenin features shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior t the issuance of building permits and shall be implemented in the building. A. The acoustical study shall be based on the worst-case scenario, or on a soun level that will not be exceeded at any given time. B. Management shall be responsible for the music/entertainment volume levels. C. During the performance of any live entertainment, the exterior doors an windows shall remain closed. D. The air conditioning system shall be of an adequate capacity to air condition th entire restaurant. 7. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 8. The business shall provide adequate staffing, management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business and in nearby public areas. 9. The Police Chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists, and may authorize the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to eliminate the problem, and then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, which will automatically initiate a review of this conditional use permit by the Commission. 10. The exterior of all the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained free of graffiti at all times. -2- 11. Any changes to the interior or exterior layout which would alter the primary function of the business as a restaurant shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 12. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 13. No live entertainment shall be permitted in the outside seating area, and the volume level of any amplified music in the outside seating area shall be controlled by management to ensure compliance with the noise ordinance. 14. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the city's noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments. Noise emanating from the property shall be monitored to verify compliance with the noise ordinance in response to any complaints. 15. The Planning Commission shall review the operation of the restaurant and the parking facility for compliance with conditions of approval and compliance with the Noise Ordinance 6 months from the opening of the new outdoor seating area, and in response to any complaints thereafter. Section 6. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed a the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The grant for live entertainment shall not be in effect until the acoustical study is complete and approved by the Community Development Director, and all sound proofing measures are implemented in the building pursuant to Condition Nos. 12, 14, and 16. The Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan Amendment shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. -3- The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. Section 7. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. VOTE: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 03-14 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of March 18, 2003. Ron Pizer, Cha' an March 18, 2003 Date CUPR1332 (03-1) -4- ��• Sol Blume eld, ecretary October 21, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of October 26, 2004 AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE SOUTH BAY CITIES COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Recommendation: That the City Council approve the amendments to the JPA for the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. Background: The SBCCOG has been working on updating the JPA and Bylaws over the last several months. The attached information details the changes approved by the Board of Directors of the SBCCOG and it is now ready for each of the cities to approve them. Respectfully submitted, /.17(AA1r) Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 7a • i South Bay Cities Council of Governments October 7, 2004 TO: SBCCOG Cities FROM: Jacki Bacharach, SBCCOG Executive Director RE: Recommended JPA & Bylaws Changes Over the last few months the SBCCOG has been reviewing its Bylaws and Joint Powers Authority agreement. Changes were recommended in order to have these documents conform to practices that have evolved over time such as letting alternates participate in SBCCOG meetings when they attend and designating one delegate and the rest of the council as alternates. The recommended changes were approved by the Board on September 23, 2004. The Bylaws changes are now in effect. The amendments to the Joint Powers Authority agreement will need to be approved by all member cities. A summary of the proposed changes is as follows: Joint Powers Authority Agreement ■ Page 5 — Section 5a1 — Allows legislative body or Mayor if so designated to appoint delegate & alternate ■ Page 5 — Section 5a.2 — Designation of Alternate — only allows for one person. • Page 6 — Section 7a. Voting and Participation — Alternates can only participate in the absence of the Delegate • Page 7 — Section 11— Vice -Chair (Finance) is the name of the 2"d officer, not 2"d Vice Chair. • Page 7 — Section 11— 2"d paragraph — Elections to be held in May and terms expire June 30. We have been holding elections in June with nominations in May. • Page 8 — Sections 13 & 14 — our Treasurer is doing very little of this. A version of the previous JPA agreement with highlighting the above changes is also attached. • • FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT "SOUTH BAY CITIES COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS" (A JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY) This First Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement ("First Amended and Restated Agreement"), which is dated for identification purposes July 1, 1998, is made and entered into by and between the public entities (collectively, "Members") whose names are set forth on Exhibit A, pursuant to Section 6500 et se . of the Government Code and other applicable law: WITNESSETH: The parties hereto do agree as follows: Section 1. Recitals. This First Amended and Restated Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the following facts. a. In 1977, a group of cities, commonly known as the South Bay Cities, entered into that certain Joint Powers Agreement, Phase III (Implementation) South Bay Corridor (Transportation) Study in the County of Los Angeles (the "South Bay Corridor JPA"). The South Bay Corridor JPA has subsequently been amended and extended so that the current membership consists of the agencies whose names are set forth on Exhibit B. The current termination date of the South Bay Corridor JPA is June 30, 1998. b. Historically, the South Bay Cities also participated in an unincorporated association known as the South Bay Cities Association. The South Bay Cities Association played a valuable role in serving as a forum for the exchange of ideas and information among its member cities; however, the growing need for the South Bay Cities to develop and implement their own subregional policies and plans and voluntarily and cooperatively to resolve differences among themselves required a more representative and formal structure. c. The public interest required a joint powers agency to conduct studies and projects designed to improve and coordinate the common governmental responsibilities and services on an area -wide and subregional basis. The Members believed that the existing South Bay Corridor JPA as presently constituted was inadequate to satisfy these purposes and that they might c:'ulocunn^nts and settinws`:robirtylocal settings temporary itllernet filestolk2v.5.O8 jpa amended aereentent - su�restcd ehanges.duec: N4in 10 S I rtp'.slx tt3a3Aloe x:'data i:t~w vord'.sbceog'.fibe—}pa4:t#c 05/28/98 better be satisfied through the establishment of a joint powers agency of broader scope, to be known as a council of governments. d. The public interest required that such an agency explore areas of inter- governmental cooperation and coordination of government programs and provide recommendations and solutions to problems of common and general concern to its Members. e. The public interest required that an agency with the aforementioned goals not possess the authority to compel any of its Members to conduct any activities or implement any plans or strategies that the Member did not wish to undertake (except for the payment of dues). f. Each Member is a governmental entity established by law with full powers of government in legislative, administrative, financial, and other related fields. g. Each Member, by and through its legislative body, determined that a subregional organization to assist in planning and voluntary coordination among the cities in the South Bay was required in furtherance of the public interest, necessity and convenience. h. Each Member, by and through its legislative body, independently determined that the public interest, convenience and necessity required creation of a joint powers authority to be known as the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. J. In the Spring of 1995, each Member, by and through its legislative body approved the execution of the joint powers agreement by and on behalf of each such Member. Following execution by 10 of the Eligible Public Entities, the South Bay Cities Council of Governments was formed effective as of April 1, 1995. A Notice of Joint Powers Agreement was filed with the California Secretary of State as of June 22, 1995, and assigned file number 1450. In 1997, the Members determined that it would be advantageous to establish a formal, elected position of Vice -Chair (Finance) and circulated a First Amendment to Agreement Establishing the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (A Joint Powers Authority.) The First Amendment was approved by 2/3 of the legislative bodies of the Members and became effective May 1, 1997. c:\docurnents and settii . s\\robin\focal settings`.temporary iiernct fi les \\oIk2`5.98 ipa amended ap:re m.:nt - Su2:1Ct,d Change s.doci ::-rti-iws`.tc.mp'ishe ipa3.(locx:\data\la«\.woi eg\sbc_ jpa3.doc. 05/28/98 • • • k. The Members now desire to further amend the joint powers agreement to establish a mechanism by which the total voting membership for quorum and voting purposes would consist only of Members not on inactive status. Creation of Separate Legal Entity. A separate legal entity is created within the meaning of Section 6503.5 of the California Government Code; this entity shall exercise its powers in accordance with the provisions of this First Amended and Restated Agreement and applicable law. Section 2. Section 3. Name. The name of this separate legal entity shall be the South Bay Cities Council of Governments ("Council"). Section 4. Purpose and Powers of the Council. a. Purpose of Council. The purpose of the Council is to provide a vehicle for the Members to engage voluntarily in regional and cooperative planning and coordination of government services and responsibilities, to assist the Members in the conduct of their affairs. It is the express intent of the members that the Council shall not possess the authority to compel any Member to conduct any activity or to implement any plan or strategy that the Member does not wish to undertake (except for the payment of dues). The goal and intent of the Council is one of voluntary cooperation among cities in the South Bay for the collective benefit of all. b. Common Powers. The Council shall have, and may exercise, the following powers: (1) Serve as an advocate in representing the Members of the South Bay Cities at the regional, state and federal levels on issues of importance to the South Bay Cities; (2) Serve as a forum for the review, consideration, study, development and recommendation of public policies and plans with subregional or regional significance; (3) Assemble information helpful in the consideration of problems peculiar to the Members; (4) Employ Member resources or presently -existing, single -purpose public/private groups to carry out its programs and projects; c: documents and settint s robin\local settims`,temporary it3ternct 'file olk2.; 9 ipa arnend d altreement - s12�,c.sted slitr c .duce-i-wind(Ws.....tt{p\sbc spa3.,ciiK:x:`t ataTliw`Averd\slx;cou skie-jpa3AFx 05/28/98 (5) • • Explore practical avenues for voluntary intergovernmental cooperation, coordination and action in the interest of local public welfare and improving the administration of governmental services; (6) Assist in coordinating subregional planning efforts and in resolving conflicts among the cities in the South Bay as they work toward achieving planning goals; (7) Build a consensus among the Members on the implementation of policies and programs for addressing subregional and regional issues; (8) Serve as a mechanism for obtaining regional, state, and federal grants to assist in financing the expenditures of the Council; (9) Make and enter into contracts, including contracts for the services of engineers, consultants, planners, attorneys and single purpose public/private groups; (10) Employ agents, officers and employees; (11) Apply for, receive and administer a grant or grants under any regional, state, or federal program; (12) Receive gifts, contributions and donations of property, funds, services and other forms of financial assistance from persons, firms, corporations and any governmental entity; (13) Lease, manage, maintain, and operate any buildings, works, or improvements; and (14) Delegate some or all of its powers to the Executive Director as provided below. c. Exercise of Powers. The Council shall, in addition, have all implied powers necessary to perform its functions. It shall exercise its powers only in a manner consistent with the provisions of applicable law, this First Amended and Restated Agreement and the Bylaws. For the purposes of determining the restrictions to be imposed on the Council in its manner of exercising its powers pursuant to Government Code Section 6509, reference shall be made to, and the Council shall observe, the restrictions imposed upon the City_of _Lomita . c: documents and settings'\rohin`•..local settings`,t mporary i4ernct files,o1k2'5.9S ipa amended an2reement - su ucsti cl cI.ian_,;es.do _windatemp\\sh m jpa 3.-docx:\chat-a ; wer4skeetl sbc ipa3.dee 05/28/98 • I Section 5. Creation of Governing Board and General Assembly. a. Creation of Governing Board. A Governing Board for the Council ("Governing Board") is created to conduct the affairs of the Council. The Governing Board shall be constituted as follows: (1) Designation of Governing Board Representatives. The legislative body (OR THE MAYOR IF AUTHORIZED) of each of the Members shall IN WRITING designate one person as the Member's representative on the Governing Board ("Governing Board Representative")._ (2) Designation of Alternate Governing Board Representatives. The legislative body (OR THE MAYOR IF AUTHORIZED) of each of the Members shall designate IN WRITING one OR MORE PERSONS TO SERVE persen as the Member's alternate representative on the Governing Board ("Alternate Governing Board Representative"). (3) Eligibility. No person shall be eligible to serve as a Governing Board Representative or Alternate Governing Board Representative unless that person is, at all times during the tenure of that person as a Governing Board Representative or Alternate Governing Board Representative, a member of the legislative body of one of the appointing Members. Should any person serving on the Governing Board fail to maintain the status required by this Section 5, that person's position on the Governing Board shall be deemed vacated as of the date such person ceases to qualify pursuant to the provisions of this Section 5, and the Member shall be entitled to appoint a qualified replacement. b. Creation of General Assembly. A General Assembly for the Council ("General Assembly") is created to discuss issues and make recommendations to the Governing Board. All elected officials of the legislative bodies of all Members shall be members of the General Assembly. The Chair of the Governing Board shall be the Chair of the General Assembly. A General Assembly may be called by the Chair of the Governing Board or by a majority of the Governing Board representatives. Section 6. Use of Public Funds and Property. The Council shall be empowered to utilize for its purposes, public and/or private funds, property and other c:.documents and sewrinmsyrobitr.local settings'temporarV iLiernet jpa amended 32d -cement sum.sted ehan es.d cc '.windows temp-sbe jpa3.tocx:\data\Iaw\\word\sbcco_`.sbc_jpa3.doc 05/28/98 • • resources received from the Members and/or from other sources. Where applicable, the governing Board of the Council may permit one or more of the Members to provide in-kind services, including the use of property, in lieu of devoting cash to the funding of the Council's activities. Section 7. Functioning of Governing Board. a. Voting and Participation. Through its Governing Board Representative, each Member may cast only one vote for each issue before the Governing Board. An Alternate Governing Board Representative may participate or vote in the proceedings of the Governing Board only in the absence of that Member's Governing Board Representative. A Governing Board Representative or Alternate Governing Board Representative seated on the Governing Board shall be entitled to participate and vote on matters pending before the Governing Board only if such person is physically present at the meeting of the Governing Board and if the Member which that Governing Board Representative or Alternate Governing Board Representative represents is not on inactive status (as defined in Section 21.b of this First Amended and Restated Agreement). b. Proxy Voting. No absentee ballot or proxy shall be permitted. c. Quorum. A quorum of the Governing Board shall consist of not less than fifty percent (50%) plus one (1) of its total voting membership (as defined in Section 21.b of this First Amended and Restated Agreement). d. Committees. As needed, the Governing Board may create permanent or ad hoc advisory committees to give advice to the Governing Board on such matters as may be referred to such committees by the Governing Board. All committees shall have a stated purpose before they are formed. Standing committees shall remain in existence until they are dissolved by the Governing Board. Ad hoc committees shall be dissolved upon completion of their designated functions. Committees, unless otherwise provided by law, this First Amended and Restated Agreement, the Bylaws or by direction of the Governing Board, may be composed of representatives to the Governing Board and nonrepresentatives to the Governing Board. e. Actions. Actions taken by the Governing Board shall be by not less than fifty percent (50%) plus one (1) of the voting representatives of the Governing Board which are present with a quorum in attendance, unless by a provision of applicable law, this First Amended and Restated Agreement, c:`,docurnents and settinilslrobin' local salines':tenrporary- it6crnet f ilesvolk2 5.()S jpa amended awreement - sut!�cstcd di in cs.docc:'.w in<lows'tt nmp+she jpa?.<f<hi: -1aw fek- sbc__jpa3.do t 05/28/98 Section 8. • • the Bylaws or by direction of the Governing Board, a higher number of votes is required to carry a particular motion. Duties of the Governing Board. The Governing Board shall be deemed, for all purposes, the policy making body of the Council. All of the powers of the Council, except as may be expressly delegated to others pursuant to the provisions of applicable law, this First Amended and Restated Agreement, the Bylaws or by direction of the Governing Board, shall be exercised by and through the Governing Board. Section 9. Roberts Rules of Order. The substance of Roberts Rules of Order shall apply to proceedings of the Governing Board, except as may otherwise be provided by provisions of applicable law, this First Amended and Restated Agreement, the Bylaws or by direction of the Governing Board. Section 10. Meetings of Governing Board. The Governing Board shall, by means of the adoption of Bylaws, establish the dates and times of regular meetings of the Governing Board. The location of each such meeting shall be as directed by the Governing Board. Section 11. Election of Chair and Vice -Chairs. The Chair of the Governing Board shall conduct all meetings of the Governing Board and perform such other duties and functions as required of such person by provisions of applicable law, this First Amended and Restated Agreement, the Bylaws or by direction of the Governing Board. The 1ST Vice -Chair shall serve as Chair in the absence of the Chair and shall perform such duties as may be required by provisions of applicable law, this First Amended and Restated Agreement, the Bylaws, or by the direction of the Governing Board or the Chair. The 2ND Vice -Chair (Finance)_ shall serve as Chair in the absence of the Chair and the 1S1 Vice -Chair and shall perform such duties as may be required by provisions of applicable law, this First Amended and Restated Agreement, the Bylaws, or by the direction of the Governing Board or the Chair. In addition, the 2ND Vice -Chair (Finance) shall supervise the Treasurer and Auditor in the performance of the duties assigned to them by Section 14 of the First Amended and Restated Agreement. A Governing Board Representative shall be elected annually to the position of Chair of the Governing Board, a second Governing Board Representative shall be elected to the position of Vice -Chair of the Governing Board and a third Governing Board Representative shall be elected to the position of Vice -Chair (Finance) of the Governing Board, at the first regular meeting of the Governing Board held in JUNE May of each calendar year. The terms c:Adocuments and scttinjs'rohin local settim2,s''temporary it ernet frles',o1lk2vv5.Q8 jpa amended a_reement - suecesied elianrges,(10CC:W111(10WfitctI sl e J 3.(10C— tiat-a37ia-VANVO� r�,i ;i. .pa -3, -doe 05/28/98 • • of office of the Chair, 1sT Vice -Chair and 2ND Vice -Chair (Finance) shall commence on July 1 and expire of the succeeding June 30. If there is a vacancy, for any reason, in the position of Chair, Vice -Chair or Vice -Chair (Finance), the Governing Board shall forthwith conduct an election and fill such vacancy for the unexpired term of such prior incumbent. Section 12. Executive Director. The Governing Board may appoint by a vote of fifty percent (50%) plus one (1) of the total voting membership a qualified person to be Executive Director, on any basis it desires including, but not limited to, a contract or employee basis. The Executive Director shall be neither a Governing Board Representative, nor an Alternate Governing Board Representative, nor an elected official of any Eligible Public Entity (as defined in Section 21(c) of this First Amended and Restated Agreement). The Executive Director shall be the chief administrative officer of the Council. The Executive Director shall receive such compensation as may be fixed by the Governing Board. The Executive Director shall serve at the pleasure of the Governing Board and may be relieved from such position at any time, without cause, by a vote of fifty percent (50%) plus one (1) of the total voting membership of the Governing Board taken at a regular, adjourned regular or special meeting of the Governing Board. The Executive Director shall perform such duties as may be imposed upon that person by the provisions of applicable law, this First Amended and Restated Agreement, the Bylaws, or by the direction of the Governing Board. Section 13. Designation of Treasurer and Auditor. The Governing Board shall, in accordance with applicable law, designate a qualified person to act as the Treasurer of the Council and a qualified person to act as the Auditor of the Council. If the Governing Board so designates, and in accordance with provisions of applicable law, a qualified person may hold both the office of Treasurer and the office of Auditor of the Council. The compensation, if any, of a person or persons holding the offices of Treasurer and/or Auditor shall be set by the Governing Board. RE. -WRITE TO REFLECT CURRENT PRACTICE WITHIN THE LAW Section 14. Duties of Treasurer and Auditor. The person holding the position of Treasurer of the Council shall have charge of the depositing and custody of all funds held by the Council. The Treasurer shall perform such other duties as may be imposed by provisions of applicable law, including those duties described in Section 6505.5 of the Government Code, and such c:Adocuments and settingstrobin1ocal settirt svtemporary iiaerncrfil�c`c�11 2`�. )S " a arnendeci a<recu nt cad rl es_docc_vvindowi_tt}{tpi she _ipa?does:`,data\I 05/28/98 • • duties as may be required by the Governing Board. The Council's Auditor shall perform such functions as may be required by provisions of applicable law, this First Amended and Restated Agreement, the Bylaws and by the direction of the Governing Board. RE -WRITE. TO REFLECT CURRENT PRACTICE WITHIN THE LAW Section 15. Designation of Other Officers and Employees. The Governing Board may appoint or employ such other officers or employees as it deems appropriate and necessary to conduct the affairs of the Council. Section 16. Obligations of Council. The debts, liabilities and obligations of the Council shall be the debts, liabilities or obligations of the Council alone. No Member of the Council shall be responsible, directly or indirectly, for any obligation, debt or liability of the Council, whatsoever. Section 17. Control and Investment of Council Funds. The Governing Board shall adopt a policy for the control and investment of its funds and shall require strict compliance with such policy. The policy shall comply, in all respects, with all provisions of applicable law. Section 18. Implementation Agreements. When authorized by the Governing Board, affected Members may execute an Implementation Agreement for the purpose of authorizing the Council to implement, manage and administer area -wide and regional programs in the interest of the local public welfare. The costs incurred by the Council in implementing a program, including indirect costs, shall be assessed only to those Members who are parties to that Implementation Agreement. Section 19. Term. The Council created pursuant to this First Amended and Restated Agreement shall continue in existence until such time as this First Amended and Restated Agreement is terminated. This First Amended and Restated Agreement may not be terminated except by an affirmative vote of not less than fifty percent (50%) plus one (1) of the then total voting membership of the Governing Board. Section 20. Application of Laws to Council Functions. The Council shall comply with all applicable laws in the conduct of its affairs, including, but not limited to, the Ralph M. Brown Act. (Section 54950 et seq., of the Government Code.) Section 21. Members. c:yv.docurnents and sci ine,syrobiny.local scttingsvtemporary ir9ernct files'-o1k2\5.98 jpa amcndcdm ftcni nr --.112,Le,rcci chaives.docc . w ndo s`letwsbc tpa?.docN to\law\wordlsbccot txttipa-3,tice 05/28/98 S • • a. Withdrawal. A member may withdraw from the Council by filing its written notice of withdrawal with the Chair of the Governing Board 60 days before the actual withdrawal. Such a withdrawal shall be effective at 12:00 o'clock a.m. on the last day of that 60 -day period. The withdrawal of a Member shall not in any way discharge, impair or modify the voluntarily - assumed obligations of the withdrawn Member in existence as of the effective date of its withdrawal. Withdrawal of a Member shall not affect the remaining Members. A withdrawn Member shall not be entitled to the return of any funds or other assets belonging to the Council, until the effective date of termination of this First Amended and Restated Agreement, except that a withdrawn Member shall be entitled to the balance of the annual dues paid for the year by that Member which were intended for the remaining part of that year. Withdrawal from any Implementation Agreement shall not be deemed withdrawal from the Council. b. Total Voting Membership/Inactive Status. The total voting membership shall consist of all Members, except those that have withdrawn or are on Inactive Status. A Member will be placed on Inactive Status if either of the following events occurs: (1) Non -Payment of Dues. If a Member fails to pay dues within three months of the annual dues assessment as required under- Section 23 of this First Amended and Restated Agreement and the Bylaws, and after a 30 -day written notice is provided to that Member, the Member shall be deemed to be suspended from this First Amended and Restated Agreement and the Council. When a Member is suspended, no representative of that Member shall participate or vote on the Governing Board. Such a Member shall be readmitted only upon the payment of all dues then owed by the Member, including dues incurred prior to the suspension and during the suspension. (2) Failure to Attend Meetings. If a Member is not represented by its Governing Board Representative or Alternate Governing Board Representative for three consecutive regular meetings of the Governing Board, that Member will be placed on Inactive Status until such time as its Governing Board Representative or Alternate Governing Board Representative next attends a regular meeting of the Governing Board. c. Admitting Eligible Public Entities. Eligible public entities whose names are set forth on Exhibit C to this First Amended and Restated Agreement ("Eligible Public Entities") shall be admitted to the Council by 1) adopting c:'vdocnrnents and sctt-int2s\robirr;local settings\temporary i1iQ'rnct filesy.olk2v5.98 IN amended atlracrnent - su2122.ested than 4es.docc wv_inclo ste-n*ksbc _tpa;.doE-x:`:elata\liw.4 ofd\.sbccog`sberi:pa 41{4e 05/28/98 • • this First Amended and Restated Agreement by a majority vote of the legislative body of the Eligible Public Entity and 2) properly signing this First Amended and Restated Agreement. An Eligible Public Entity may be admitted regardless of whether it adopted and signed this First Amended and Restated Agreement before or after the Effective Date (as defined in Section 28 of this First Amended and Restated Agreement). No vote of the Governing Board shall be required to admit an Eligible Public Entity. d. Admitting Additional Members. Additional Members who are not Eligible Public Entities may be admitted to the Council upon an affirmative vote of not less than fifty percent (50%) plus one (1) of the total voting membership of the Governing Board provided that such a proposed new Member is a city whose jurisdiction, or part thereof, lies immediately adjacent to one or more of the Eligible Public Entities. Admission shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the Governing Board may deem appropriate. Section 22. Non -Interference with Function of Members. The Governing Board shall not take any action that constitutes an interference with the exercise of lawful powers by a Member of the Council. Section 23. Limitation of Liability. All agreements entered into by the Council shall contain a limitation of liability provision, providing that, except as voluntarily assumed by a particular Member, Members shall not be liable to employees, contractors and other third parties. Section 24. Dues of members. The Members of the Council shall be responsible for the payment to the Council, annually, of dues in the amounts periodically budgeted by the Governing Board, as and for the operating costs of the Council ("Dues"), as provided in the Bylaws. Section 25. Disposition of Assets. Upon termination of this First Amended and Restated Agreement, after the payment of all obligations of the Council, any assets remaining shall be distributed to the Members in proportion to the then obligation of those Members' obligation to participate in the funding of the Council. Section 26. Amendment. This First Amended and Restated Agreement may be amended at any time with the consent of two-thirds (2/3) of all of the legislative bodies of the Members. c:'docurnents and settinp,sohirivlocal settamts en�oa +ry ilaiernet filesvoll 2y5.9S ipa amended a��reernci Lban , :.dmmcc:'‘1 irxiow` ft mp she _ p a3 it,L-ddta'asw'<WOffI'sbcc og sbc tpa Ac€ 05/28/98 ,,u::sacstc'ai • • Section 27. Incorporation by Reference. Each Exhibit to this First Amended and Restated Agreement is incorporated into the agreement by this reference, as though it were fully set forth in the body of the agreement. Section 28. Effective Date. The effective date ("Effective Date") of this First Amended and Restated Agreement shall be the first day of the first month following the date on which two-thirds (2/3) of the legislative bodies of the Members adopt and sign this First Amended and Restated Agreement. That the Members of this First Amended and Restated Agreement have caused this agreement to be executed on their behalf, respectively, as follows: Mayor, City of Carson Date: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Mayor, City of Gardena Date: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney c:'docuntenta and settintsvtobin`loeal ;ettinj;,tenipowary i1i inct ttIes'oIk2 5.9S pa amended xtreemenr - cI anLs.doce:. windows temp she J -pa .doex: data\law\wt l'sbeco .'shc_ Jpa?' flee 05/28/98 _(:;ted • • Mayor, City of El Segundo Mayor, City of Hawthorne Date: Date: ATTEST: ATTEST: 'City Clerk City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City Attorney Mayor, City of Hermosa Beach Mayor, City of Lomita Date: Date: ATTEST: ATTEST: City Clerk City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City Attorney c:=documenis and settinus,robin\local setiings temporary ildernct tilesvolk2v5.9S spa amended aueement - s11214ostec{ c han L:s.docc-_winc ows te�ic}vcl�c Jpa3.k.l cx: tial` aw\woriP4c:co� sti Hulce 05/28/98 Mayor, City of Inglewood Mayor, City of Los Angeles Date: Date: ATTEST: ATTEST: City Clerk City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City Attorney Mayor, City of Lawndale Mayor, City of Manhattan Beach Date: Date: ATTEST: ATTEST: City Clerk City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City Attorney c:'.docurnents and settings rohin\local setfings`tempor-ary i14 rnet files'oIk2'5.QS jpa amended aereernent Su99.ested chan9es.docc w-indovk,tEiatp sbc, 1pa._tloe*:`chatallaw'.worEf=sl-?c:cog sbc_ a cdc 05/28/98 • • Mayor, Palos Verdes Estates Mayor, City of Rolling Hills Date: Date: ATTEST: ATTEST: City Clerk City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City Attorney Mayor, Rancho Palos Verdes Mayor, City of Rolling Hills Estates Date: Date: ATTEST: ATTEST: City Clerk City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City Attorney c: docurnents and settings robin'vylocal settinus'Aen porary illkrnct files 011,2 5.QS jpa amended ;.u_lreentent �u",�Stcri c:han;les.cl(,cc—w-indo `.data=Nam<iaerdsbec{jg=4467 pa3:Elc e 05/28/98 • • Mayor, City of Redondo Beach Mayor, City of Torrance Date: Date: ATTEST: ATTEST: City Clerk City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City Attorney c: documents and settinc4sv.robin\ ocal settirr,s.ternporary il6rnct files ;olk2;5.98 spa amended ancement - su^_t2.dsted clran.gcs.docf_'ww-tndo ww, • tcmp,s 1pa?.doc-datalaw*we{d\sbccog'sbc jpa3.doc 05/28/98 EXHIBIT A [List of Member Agencies] Carson El Segundo Gardena Hawthorne Hermosa Beach Inglewood Lawndale Lomita Los Angeles (15th Council District Representative) Manhattan Beach Palos Verdes Estates Rancho Palos Verdes Redondo Beach Rolling Hills Rolling Hills Estates Torrance c:\documents and settinus'.robin \local scaings,temporary iligernet tiles olk2'..5.QS pa arnendc(1 JJCcrfleIit sw,n2xStai Chail2cS.cli)cC:'‘‘ jpa3.docdat-a4a-erfkbccog'.sbc7jpa-_-3,dee 05/28/98 • • EXHIBIT B [List of Member Agencies in South Bay Corridor JPA] Carson City of Los Angeles El Segundo Manhattan Beach Gardena Palos Verdes Estates Hawthorne Rancho Palos Verdes Hermosa Beach Redondo Beach Inglewood Rolling Hills Lawndale Rolling Hills Estates Lomita Torrance c:'.docurnents and settinilsv.rohin local sctttncstemporary i1t&nrnct filesyolk2':5.Q8 j anr:ndc'd \, in<]<i�ks tcrt�li s>� tpa _doc—c:`.data la l.sbccog43c-tpaz.-doc 05/28/98 .0 • EXHIBIT C [List of Eligible Public Entities] Carson El Segundo Gardena Hawthorne Hermosa Beach Inglewood Lawndale Lomita Los Angeles (15th Council District Representative) Manhattan Beach Palos Verdes Estates Rancho Palos Verdes Redondo Beach Rolling Hills Rolling Hills Estates Torrance County of Los Angeles c:\doeurnents and sen.int.ls\robin\local settings\temporan, iWrnet files\olk2\5.98 ipa amended auccmcnt snf4gestiect c ha n ,;!.c s. d occ :' indoW S'.t. crop sbc, J pa 3 .doc x: \data \law\ wordsbc-av_2. \sbe—jpa-3,doc 05/28/98 October 20, 2004 City Council Meeting October 26, 2004 Mayor and Members of the City Council VACANCY - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - APPOINTMENT TO PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council appoint from among the applicants interviewed earlier this evening to fill three expired terms on the Public Works Commission. Background: Three terms on the Public Works Commission will expire October 31, 2004. At its meeting of August 10, 2004, the City Council directed that the City Clerk advertise for applicants for the three seats. Notice was posted at City Hall and published in the Easy Reader August 19 and 26, with an October 5 deadline for submitting applications. All three appointments will be for full four-year terms ending October 31, 2008. At its meeting of October 12, the Council scheduled a meeting for 6:00 p.m. prior to the October 26 regular meeting for the purpose of interviewing the five applicants — all were notified by telephone and mail of the date, time and place of the scheduled interviews. Five applications are on file at this time for the three seats (see attached). The applicants are: Noted: Stephen Richard Applebaum Michael DiVirgilio Geoffrey Hirsch Jean Lombardo Daniel Marinelli Elaine Doerfling, City Crf rk 8a • • PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION APPLICANTS • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION Name /Z I GN /10 Address: /i,(o D/� Occupation/Profession: Name of Employer Address of Employer REFERENCES: Local: ‘/f/4Y /t✓J/4n/-- /40-ftdfr6(40 f& t,4 /7 - 37/- r97� Professional: /&/MCL 4 / 4--7-- oz -5 //YSax/fi'✓c 7'). -`//IJ do4Tit /` & 600 7V Other. A1C Az -e -K. 3 2. /OW g f37 -35Z3 Home Phone: 3 79- 717 Bus. Phone: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): /gcic vve2K5641011S,S Alere_ 1 Lirre. ®-gg/zYle5/, m' _ - b�DRL�y. CoASH Koos SPoQTs - rom GirrceZ coo' ,13r9s467.6/f«-, /�a1c tee -y -nvo /Z4 r5r,Jg - 9400 a 692 /co e)-13 DSV Why do you wish to become a Commission member? i Woldo G/le TO �^.i N' 7-70.01,O.2-11 4.3y ,ms5/5-,?„/6 -77/6---- "W. De4.52, ;ifr, Z ' 4 / /7E.n.i, /Ay Ni'/ eve /4440 ,9t T�c,4ES4O6-r✓T�' &/ �-'--,1os1 /n//4 ,-9/1t/' tpfr- /vrE,ze r What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? 7.--/K—e". �ES�o/✓S�/�l�/T�ES �6 //7-7-6-71/, f 7-34 /5 &5 7 /t'EZ r7-/ /JIr0,e' v"15� QEG(i/�/on/S,/i✓ .</,'t, -7z-7-7/1/6 Tg-e- /f 2 1/1/04-K s STf/GF. R I4 / 2,0 A- Pi-6734vM • Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes o If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. l�ivly[ 5 /r y �f 5.gwr, 74/11/c4 J749i�n5 e2-' s�4/1-(1/Yt-Isyc1/04e6Y-h✓9906eE- L �z y ST�rLrvrn'r'/ . /�%/f 6exiIer .-if/i'1d,4/i Wo/v5 /41-41x-erLl/vv%i//47744/5 /l77 �ESl4�>YT �WNEI'L 1.1,4,1970677/176 K /1/ /49- 4L1 '- 46cri emv/✓6 MfearY Awye - im✓E Ocvy /�✓� /1Fco/vsi/' ' 7 o Sc-v� � � J /&/ /�/�uro/�✓6 i ����1�2cl�tL B cc-�BvI4_,ING , - e "tX,eizi -e' 14//r, t��/� 5, t /6i/✓�r/V6 A-401.5 ��e3 - � �✓ v Rte/qiay , c%NuNG This Board/Commission meets on V147,Nt5,4Y at 7'©42 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes TX No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? _Z 3 Ye -77 - Comments: 7bComments: vi3Ol/K�D .4S (55(o/Ve (mG 45 W A45 FoYe9>z ,4// /C ,9w iMl/c 6moG' r/4/,e 5i�/0//✓6 if‘es Xe- f (/�6->I7e QTS Ao,a/✓5llf6/7? (kg_ L HA✓&- /41 bozo 7 /&N /P Wi%/f MicC'ilt41 P4 /Va i /7v& Y✓�a: D i 6e -e- 7-0 /v /ir/,/c O&A/g2/11 77,l7,, �4/e726y 'TD Sc'M9' 7Vv"i /fes ���/5��� F 72 f//6/YY? 6.-00 Signed: Date: 129— ' o (4/23/01) Page 2 of 2 OCT. 5. 2004 4:26PM Name • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 1019 P. 1 6_1- NAME OF COMMISSION QUI 1 k Works- C00444.1 SS; c,, Home Phone: /. — 7 Address: 4 6 a a"c) Sf. / / /4 CE U� 0,t'; I- 7 - I Fs i Occupation/Profession: S M r- e k c�cJ I/'Gsesi L Name of Employer Co S,T kio,v ct- TTCJns Piaronav\ Bus. Phone: d 93- 36 36 Address of Employer Pia/ , Rost (parr Atk- 1‘,/k 3017 0 REFERENCES: Local: I� roc k keen Professional: Pi k4e'( kee3ck.•1 r 7�T 8 ^ as69 Other: L l rl G'� �U I; ., �� - 6 089. - COMMUNITY PARTICIPATIONAND SERVICE (past and present): J vc le -eq -e ({cftc -f,, offere o F S�c.�d 7 19°-)1 Henrt6SG Ar+su11 44.17'6el / &rd caGird/laI ' �C�/1 Cc Vo/oh leer f/ i CG atr7 t/aq o 'J9' 4s we.,(( 1/O(On1Cerc) 1-.)/7-4 tib P1440 • n) awn,'sr 07 (j'C = 6e4ex book, 4 Why do you wish to become a Commission member? T w id 4 i» .6e come q Co -,i, , Ss/o4er fa At A'? .0"‹ �va1&A i , is, Ply 44601411034 Bpac�. Q. 4c.eS2.e e/4 re 1ta /rv'e_ also wo��ci Co�7S'c�uie o /vf o -f 1-» / f4ert y� bd ter kla- Ma f. "kJ k01811;74 401811 i' What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? u e Ccs Curl- c ► IN a escf i fc`. _ • -r iront e c (co / SJ/ten • e,( i s 4 ',len/Zce.v ,'e /IA 4.1c to ,/o -ie bes•f-Pols, io4 a4 ot.//eF(i nrf. erred ve / Ab /,''c G,Jor k 4r' elr` kos✓''s'r dem. Gine( eH-ipewerrr� cefy Page 1 oft rovn cc to /cif roen�G �ar Ciiy_ OCT. 5. 2004 4:27PM • • NO. 1019 P. 2 Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, me nbetships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. E Bcc/ JOir c f ScScince , r� �c c.tlin,(CA ( ,�teerr 7 � 15;J) • r l wo✓`�e) 41- 7'1 /`ee Coi7`oef4rsS (14141ehgeti J/04 Ce .rent yrcc flcrt4. I�Pcf-itr Ari ek) i 2is7,eerin� er,1 4-ecii#.2-4/ (cr. c l// - 15'4 3 - a -UO • Wor kec9 as Faer2.J tJec'id l`CPIigen I1 ectut. fi3 ye v _ �` / / /f • (r- � c,; f cn -1-1-e4 1^e CIS v[ firms Q'i' po0/0-2-015 ,p /X�l (au/j c2 0,144;2-464,s u5 �t rmss✓� o'f n�� Curre�f en l�!ke4t, This Board/Commission meets on ed J1esY 5 at -'OO p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? __Yes _No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? / years jt $ .44044 -Ls Comments: Signed: ' Date: (dc's , moo'( Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION. \9)>>`‘ ' " NAME 0/VOMMISSION19e/ k r` C /41 hs, -,,,..:._„„_...,,.., Name 6ThQ0 frfiVi/0,4 Home Phone( .>(°)1 76)''- reW Address: S" / fier I'e. 10 -A4g C qa so Occupation/Profession: t7'f'Q�Z��ere S� l Bus. Phonir : i) g�L� V Name of Employer -`'c Address of Employer REFERENCES: Local. ' / C' 0/ )409 efr fr• Y Professional: � fe9ePiwie Otheri� ho.S W '�'N again ' iVeP1(/ (o COMMUNITY PARTICIPATIO ANp SERVICE (past and present): 5-0-e C Why do y u wish o become a Commission member? k i- I What do you eel . the duties and responsibilities of a Commissioninember? r (� Ge9 '�a � / Q& eGtez i poiikcY-- _ I��1 "I1(7 C44" 4)0 • • Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes l To (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. Board/Commission meets onW11'd d, at ! .00 p.m. Do you foresee This any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach 17 Comments: d.'1!4 4 !� �I I �� /G " r if / M1817 o9 irarm,arionwevEr' )1pr Signed: Ill� " AY/ Date: /�' :�1 �' Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) a • • cev 1-/;P5b °eft 5-\ .0s0 ff(/c-i-a7 Co&iteeo Y.ek-1/./ce tapkici 5/* 2 R70 � qu�s a‘r re ei-e4 4i'oq aiernewidei• piekt'c rew47 Leq (ice "��l�� .e -.Q./(, (�qoj) __ pc_221 A 0: Z) /e. eq - 53')I-regl- C c oo - ff. A .g U .9Kkeeel q4-tfrK,/"Lko T,--0---e-t ` ligr1tte�f6iqe oi'�f sfoc/q. psy0, Cgireci)op) A 6 lbPke As I" tt?}1.z/ f‘,/i4.PI.ee C'��- fx� c�i�- ._ _Irl _ e- - C r�.ca� 1. il e Vegi -m2w )1- ,Jc2 W, ( ..e Oteftife lice 6'eYAlqf 4t a�P.Wy (>,0G2 �c7od1, 200 � P42 k &pip 01 1,vofero / it c? vf-d 0 P 5, tee r yeqr s' Itf,ee/ C7 /4- Yelefe / ,-/0--'14 pe G € , 0 /if Pl--S cc‘te ciiieig VI -4r ite -e ri 9T-1,_ y (7,ea# Cc/qI'f)*ePr � � C`47 a � X f€7,17 -e , ,O'c-. 5/ z -eg vete / tt7 eY5'P (/ I )e - Op iC /W7 Cie IC aW l<>7 Sei/u�--cam J�11' Co.1) I le/C? k dep, c�wld�'� U!n Ie/aQL� -r-‘ st-4.Qctihr"-sw-IICI 1775));L* c )14, t4) eo /0"-e Cn • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION NAME OF COMMISSION Name /---*O/i f.3A XP o Address: a? 7' to s /z,VER S %-AA/p �;^2��2001,' r p1� �R140SA Cl";` C"' 1'BEA�'Fi Ir' APPLICATION CITN Of �.1� lvoR�s /'. Occupation/Profession: �� Name of Employer Address of Employer REFERENCES: Local: ate. - e i ��:���� ��` 7' • Professional:11 /c1, s� �QP%�% & M 9/'(a a Other. C:Yi/JXLZ Jd" ` Yoe JL - / ea Gam- % Home Phone: 4- v� . Bus. Phone: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): Why do you wish to become a Commission member? What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? Page 1 of 2 • • Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes /V No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member This Board/Commission meets on 341 ���'ear at "r= p.m. Do you foresee any schedillingproblems that might make you miss meetingYes V No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Comments: Signed: Date: Page 2 of 2 (4/23/0.1) • • APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION Attachment_ Jean Lombardo 2465 Silverst-rand Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 374-5389 ieanlombardol a►,adelphia.net Education Completed Grades one thru twelve at Kansas City, Missouri public schools Four years at Kansas City Institute of Art Two years at University of Missouri Three years at Otis Parsons School Design /, Employment Legal secretary for U.S. District Attorney for Missouri 1955 —1957 Engineering Secretary for Litton Industries at Woodland Hills, CA 1962 Engineering Secretary and Tape Librarian for Scientific Computer at Litton Industries 1963 —1968 Cost Accountant for Canoga Electronics, Canoga Park, CA 1969 —1972 Head Fashion Designer at D.B.A.L.A. a wholesale apparel manufacturer 1975 —1980 Freelance Fashion Designer for various wholesale garment manufacturers 1980 —1988 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE Four years on the Hermosa Beach Public Works Commission, one year as Chairman of the Public Works Commission, Arts in the Community Chairman for California Federation of Women's Clubs, First Night, Founding member of Project Touch Car Show, Hermosa Beach celebration of the Olympics, Sister City and Hermosa Beach 90th birthday celebration, H.B. Sister City Convention, H.B. Woman's Club Art Contest for elementary school students, Friends of the Library Fortieth Anniversary, St. Patrick's Day Parade, Candidate's Forum for 1999 H.B. City Council election, YWCA 1996 Citizen of the Year, Hermosa Beach Woman of the Year. MEMBERShIIF Woman's Club of Hermosa Beach, past president - Hermosa Beach Friends of the Library - Hermosa Beach Sister City Assoc - Project Touch, former board member - Seize the Day, former board member - Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce - California Federation of Women's Clubs, current executive committee member and Chairman of Arts in the Community - CFWC Marina District, past president - Beach Cities League of Women Voters. I would like to remain on the Public Works Commission to continue my work as a member of the Tree Committee and the Gateway project. My concerns are for the quality of life for the citizens of Hermosa Beach. I feel the duties and responsibilities of a Public Works Commissioner are to consider the needs of the citizens of Hermosa Beach, and to make recommendations accordingly to the Hermosa Beach City Council. The duties include being financially responsible, taking direction from the City Council and recommending items for determination at their pleasure. Thank you for your consideration. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION 0 C T 0 5 'GO4 NAME OF COMMISSION PUD 1 i C. Wc,k.S Comsor Name 1 J0.(\ t e t )0ce.01 t'\os i rt c i 1 t Address: 1D 07 Lon3'ctto,J Avenue_ Rrm s& ac6,1 CA. c10354L( 1 Occupation/Profession:TieViSiOn CCRmtro, roof rcrsole V,c3to f,1bcluc.lio/1S Bus. Phone: Ccti 3t0 (on - (057 Home Phone: 310) 379 -11 d( 3 Name of Employer S Cr' 4o j Cc - Address of Employer JG M e. as above. REFERENCES: Local:cvin MCCarik General fraud e.rfBtac�, t-lou� k0{c.t K y. 5 Professional: Sieue �m Vire.c�b`' /\B C Spnck, CGrlStack (P l&ecic%nr1n Beat kn City Count; Other: 1 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present):Z km1C._ Loe,1e OA SAcccsScull C.rc l cin intuSM c+VC enkiirontt. tAANcrc� (idckeS crop\ ail parkics t i ,A 1 (� 1 L 1� 11ac� t u.* iMc ko S4u�e iktir Uic.1iS `io'1 rc icitras td k 1} Crccxtt� ya.Afr irvkftS` �n 1he total �+ot,t cc..1 proccS5. I �i Why do you wish to become a Commission member? TO Conk i (WC ko be Par C i% C1vic QO erAisu,c, makes ktrnoSa CStac,t-. (out _ What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? 4 r` a J C (Jc oin Ort uA,uC hoSi i rI.otAcv,ti km() Park Or & CotAN;sSic)n 1,Jiir Ike T oMM' ' o �� ' • ' e Page 1 of 2 Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could construed as a conflict of ybeing interest our with a board/commission member? Yes No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience th t you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. Ik kc S A VACctSL cina a. Gskl d t 1'tsu"t futrthAll o. r t es O j Ntesitk_ as k L16i S (t(ut> , �C xerMnso. acl, kisioriCoA Shit ►o L . 5CCrSSCuill grac1LaktrI Cton' r iftutuotral LCAcitrsLri) Vktfr",osw Ckss o cool driss tteDP MC Intro A r • tn►t. U•ot 0Aa RChC,tc Kola" Ct.►«A0r oc PO.t .. W \ 103t\s WC haul arN‘tctl a OCIA fa ft.crucl1iS% 1 4[ i'itt 1( aycsr j S4'rtc{t� J1•k StoAaa In d �1.t own�'own arca. n J J �� s Z Q jw.t on rollow ► n i\►is ( nkrr Dave ng a. Adc0 a S r c ttlLPtc x omits -10 �fot Ucia,1ionak rc att5 CurrtA boa * CitiiCI ralitornio. orCcr.1 Shall Cohnvni\;ts 10 reSnrk non-tmai}iona1 kLocs uncsoLL ht QoSj ,is_ This Board/Commission meets on hi WfA.nt_ScialS at p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes X No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? I1/4).11\4. 1 ems Comments: 1 To.) v? In a i6.1 en(,3ururt Civic 1nJulvtraeni Col ServccA yturS 1OCA rerr,tAtia &'s CovnCii N1CM6tr5 wo(Mcnbtr5 (iv IC CIubS in11olvccA to cUncc' jc* Sers (, J. C'urriies. Pi ritic4t 41 Oc CoMM�? UnY - ocicAca 15 0. (lak'uea\ Cxxi°rowk, UeA,rin5ir Signed: Date: Ddo\- . r Si 2,00'i Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) J. • • DANIEL J. MARINELLI 607 Longfellow Avenue Hermosa Beach, California 90254 310/379-1793 310/617-6387 (cell) danie118@gte.net www.33118.com CAMERA OPERATOR SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS— Emphasizes sound analysis and professionalism, solid major sports coverage expertise and skill at utilizing a proactive, team approach to the set-up, camera operation and breakdown of high -visibility, remote sports production assignments at the multi-million dollar network/independent syndication level. Areas of particular skill and proficiency include— Overview—Superior, detailed knowledge of camera work (game, hand-held POV), processes, techniques, equipment, procedures and methods used to televise major sports and special event activities; Strong, highly organized work philosophy that couples focused task achievement with thoroughness, precision and quality remote video photography; Technically experienced problem -solver with complete comprehension of coverage assignment and follow-up that requires minimal supervision; Experience—Coverage Formats—Professional sports coverage of championship, league playoff, weekly regional, Grand Prix, Derby, tournament, pro tour and scheduled Game -of -the -Week network, corporate - sponsored, international foreign broadcast and independent/syndicated events; Sports—Professional golf, tennis, track and field, downhill skiing, horse racing, auto racing, baseball, basketball, football, Super Bowl football, hockey, figure skating. Outlets/Production Units—New York, Pittsburgh and Los Angeles -based free-lance assignments for ABC SPORTS, ESPN TELEVISION, TRANSWORLD INNTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL MOBILE TELEVISION and NEP Broadcast on ABC, NBC, CBS, ESPN, NHK (Japan), FOX SPORTS and USA NETWORK. Equipment—Video Cameras and Lenses—IKEGAMI HL -55A with FUJINON 18:1 zoom; IKEGAMI HK -355 with FUJINON AH -55:9.5 zoom; IKEGAMI HK -366 with FUJINON AH -66:9.5 SESM zoom; IKEGAMI HK -377 with FUJINON 18:1 zoom; KEGAMI HK-377P/SE377 with FUJINON AH -66:9.5 SESM zoom. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY— August 1990 to Present NETWORK AND INDEPENDENT TELEVISION SPORTS COVERAGE • Free -Lance Camera Operator Los Angeles, California / New York, New York / Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania - Presently assuming a range of free-lance sports coverage assignments through primary ongoing relationships with TRANSWORLD INTERNATIONAL, New York, New York, NATIONAL MOBILE TELEVISION, Torrance (Los Angeles), California, and NEP, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Attends pre -production meetings and logistics planning sessions. Participates in major sports coverage of events at key stadiums, tracks, indoor/outdoor facilities and venues in the United States/Hawaii, Mexico and Japan. Recent production credits include - 87th Indianapolis 500 ABC SPORTS (2003) • Camera Operator—ABC Super Bowl XXXVII ABC SPORTS (2003) • Camera Operator—ABC Battle of the Network Stars NBC (2003) • Camera Operator—TWI United States Figure Skating Championships ABC SPORTS (2002) • Camera Operator—ABC Rose Bowl National Championship Game ABC SPORTS (2002) • Camera Operator—ABC The Games of the XXVII Olympiad„ Sydney, Australia NBC SPORTS (2000) • Camera Operator—SYDNEY OLYMPIC BROADCASTING ORGANISATION • r DANIEL J. MARINELLI Page 2 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY (Continued)— August 1990 to Present (Continued) NETWORK AND INDEPENDENT TELEVISION SPORTS COVERAGE • Free -Lance Camera Operator (Continued) Recent production credits (Continued) Opening the Tombs of the Golden Mummies: Live!, Bahareya, Egypt FOX (2000) • Camera Operator—FOX. XVIII Winter Olympics, Nagano, Japan TNT (1998) • Camera Operator—CHARTER BROADCAST NA MTV's Motel California, Rancho Palos Verdes, California MTV (1997) • Camera Operator—MTV NFL on NBC NBC SPORTS (1996) • Camera Operator—Weekly regional coverage ABC's College Football ABC SPORTS (1996) • Camera Operator—Seasonal coverage and Aloha Bowl The Games of the XXVI Olympiad 1996, Atlanta, Georgia AOB (1996) • Camera Operator—ATLANTA COMMITTEE FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES EDUCATION— UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania • Bachelor of Arts—Communications (August 1990) AFFILIATIONS— INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THE THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES (IATSE)/LOCAL 600 Los Angeles, California • Member NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCAST EMPLOYEES & TECHNICIANS (NABET)/LOCAL 57 Hollywood, California • Member Professional and Personal References Furnished on Request r. S EDUCATION: 1/79 Completed the Xerox Professional Selling Skills, and successfully developed the skills necessary to compete in a contemporary market. California State University Northridge, California Bachelor of Science Degree- December 1978 Major — Business Administration (Marketing) San Diego State University, San Diego, California Los Angeles Valley College, Van Nuys, California Associate of Arts Degree, June 1975 5/76 to 12/78 6/75 to 5/76 6/73 to 6/75 References on Request 4 J • STAN K. LEVINE 1707 Pacific Coast Highway Unit 223 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (310) 529-7201 or Stanlevine@adelphia.net OBJECTIVE: Maximize Sales Cultivate new clients Immediate — Territory Sales EXPERIENCE: State Farm Insurance 3/04 to the present 6/03 to 8/03 Department of Homeland Security, Washington DC. Inspector Position against Terrorism 1981 to 2002 Chicken Factory and More Inc., Torrance California CEO successfully and operated three independent restaurants. Responsibilities included employee relations, recipe formulations, account payables, account receivables, payroll, marketing and prom- otions, etc. 1/79 to 9/81 Kellogg's Sales Company, Orange, California Accounts Manager — In charge of Ralph's Grocery Headquarters, Market Basket Headquarters (now Vons), and various jobbers. Involved with promotion as well as sales. Exceeded goal incentative program by almost double in 1980. 1/76 to 8/78 DeSilva Health Products, Inc., Glendale, California Vitamin Distributor Sales position (6 months)- Initiated first sales in San Diego County and Generated substantial sales as a territory representative. Operations Manager - Subsequently was assigned recruiting of territory representatives and was responsible for training of new representatives. Vice President — Involved with promotion of products as well as sales. Designed advertising for radio, nationwide newspapers and magazines. Position offered opportunity to develop strong skills in the area of sales, office management, public relations and advertising. Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could bp'construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes ✓ No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experienc tha,t you feel ‘74/91)14quali yo a Board/Commission membe . G /� fa ik, a ylP 4J� s ,t/A/ fee Ate -4%e �ie,,e-d. � (5SJJ jfJ //j uel1 (51✓N/9 ,J 7z)L kJF/ G 76--79/ - G /ec-S i x.e /..J‘ sal t�A7 v� /9,/- 3 , A6erar? f' Ad? 694 ‘ 7.f14, 1 E? Td 6 t A s7A This Board/Commission meets on at any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes No p.m. Do you foresee How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? a.CyS Comments: Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION L'f4! l.. l�DV1,S0� Name S7 / Lf1'- Home Phone: 31i 37L-067$ wz SSroS -7244 /.T Address: /707 4pei*4 6 Co"; S T /7`wY• -.2.013 / hie C A Occupation/Profession: fi4u0Je-e c 4-7 f 1-10") -vJ 7 )l&, Bus. Phone: (.'& S 24 701-0i Name of Employer Address of Employer C5AM REFERENCES: Local: J1C/W�/ Professional: e/77 i'G/-" i &— Other: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): lS�� cel C T,(e5 -0457145 Q 7 J39 paQ/'.S — stare/yi Why do you wish to become a Commission member? /i2 f 1 /NeSJ 7a 1?/i C%,'n UwJ What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? //El/ 77t COhi/ri v,), 77 /N Ga J"-4 L lv Page 1 of 2 • Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? ? Yes No (If yes, please e plai ) lithAvdee.4- kos•e-v,...11 ifeea4..Dc14 /100fte- poil;4-Theioz.4-4-4.-4-t-1- • Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/ ommission member. • AA. S r -,:b/ S'e /c...4 se— f 0A401.441.,44-. Ode % Lt L'. , rG (%t .J c, /.3 ye4AA-d .6 74/452.45��/i.td-0.'it- - 144d et{ e2,0.4.,14..-14 ...:,)5 d /451..f'S &Ale,ote4,44-4, J....4z /e /p4 �_Fst s t�f4 ei4 �.G-sr, £ -f-C c., . . adoks-f II y.. 1D, A1Ae.1ses 7/ BSS', 4) ex. s gym. ....: Of b -) ` �sh-fAiD, This Board/Commission meets on at p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling rpblefl that might make you miss meetings? Yes No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? S c- 17 gb - 2 Comments: Signed: Date: /v Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION • cE �U �F OCT 1 8 2004, NAME OF COMMISSION C2 , W C l Y 0,,,,,,ftss,p,,) Name , A)4f Zt-0e6//40e- Address: 0e6//40tAddress: / 2 %l 2 Se )e nP/ k 1D Ca' Occupation/Profession: l ;Os u- 4444' Home Phone: 3/037(/-/04_3 Name of Employer k S n� Bus. Phone:3 (0 31N-/ 063 of Employerf � 2. S2 r L1 / r C�A-[.L f G/'4s 41 ", �''�'s' Lao Address REFERENCES:J Local: ���,.1 �D�IGv, ,/.IL, /eco i�Gp� � � Yom' - V qr� 4. e_ Professional:% Other: 104., 1,4014.4) COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERRVICE (past and present): /L•I�a. i' �c ec ///'/S,b Why do you wish to become a Commission member? 7 L, ✓-e /A.) 14)/11) 4.4),fk 77. What do you feel re the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? `fir T46 si b A .de �' d• �- - Page 1 of 2 • s CABLE TELEVISION ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICANTS i • October 20, 2004 City Council Meeting October 26, 2004 Mayor and Members of the City Council VACANCY - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS CABLE TELEVISION ADVISORY COMMISSION Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council take one of the following actions: 1) Direct staff to proceed with the cable franchise renewal process without an advisory commission; 2) Appoint a two -member commission, comprised of the two applicants; or 3) Direct the City Clerk to once again re -advertise for additional applications. Background: At its meeting of March 23, 2004 the City Council took action to establish a short-term Cable Television Advisory Commission. A notice inviting applications was posted on August 2 and was published in the Easy Reader twice (August 5 and 12) with a filing deadline of September 8. Only one application was submitted during that filing period and the Council subsequently directed the City Clerk to re -advertise for additional applications. The notice re -advertising the vacancies and inviting applications was posted on September 15 and was published in the Easy Reader twice (September 23 and 30) with a filing deadline of Tuesday, October 19, 2004, at 6:00 p.m. One additional application was received. Two applications are on file at this time (see attached). The applicants are: Gene H. Dreher Stan Levine Noted: Stephen R rre , City Manager Elaine Doerfling, City C k 8b CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION SEPTEMBER, 2004 MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT NUMBER OF PERMITS TYPE OF ACTIVITY CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE BUILDING 53 64 149 190 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 50 55 104 130 ELECTRIC 32 35 80 99 PLAN CHECK 18 24 77 69 SEWER USE 1 1 4 2 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 18 32 82 108 PARKS & RECREATION 0 1 0 1 IN LIEU PARKS &REC 1 0 4 3 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 0 SIGN REVIEW 3 1 5 4 FIRE FLOW FEES 8 9 24 26 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 0 1 2 4 COMMERCIAL INSPECTION 0 1 TOTALS 184 223 FEES COLLECTED 532 636 TYPE OF FEE CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE ' BUILDING $22,130 $28,905.58 $67,887.33 $90,522.72 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 5,507 4,527 12,230 12,265 ELECTRIC 3,801 7,494 8,477 17,043 PLAN CHECK 15,542.30 36,782.20 77,325.13 74,550.60 SEWER USE 601.22 2,311.48 2,844.84 2,654.02 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 940.40 1,600 4,141.40 5,400 PARKS & RECREATION 0 3,500 0 3,500 IN LIEU PARKS & REC 6,896 0 20,690 10,292 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 0 SIGN REVIEW 321 103 527 412 FIRE FLOW FEES 5,300.50 7,753 17,930.50 22,925.50 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 0 38 76 152 COMMERCIAL INSPECTION 0 225 TOTALS $61,039.42 $93,014.26 $212,354.20 $239,716.84 1 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 2004 TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS DWELLING UNITS VALUATION 1 101 NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES DETACHED 2 2 $792,015.75 2 102 NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES ATTACHED 1 2 $635,569.42 3 103 NEW TWO FAMILY BUILDINGS 4 104 NEW 3 OR 4 FAMILY BUILDINGS 5 105 NEW 5 OR MORE FAMILY BUILDINGS 6 213 NEW HOTELS/MOTELS 7 214 NEW OTHER NON HOUSEKEEPING 8 318 NEW AMUSEMENT & RECREATION 9 319 NEW CHURCHS/OTHER 10 320 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS 11 321 NEW PARKING GARAGES. 12 322 NEW SERVICE STATIONS/REPAIR GARAGES 13 323 NEW HOSPITALS/OTHER INSTITUTIONAL 14 324 NEW OFFICES/BANKS 15 325 NEW PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITY BUILDINGS 16 326 NEW SCHOOLS/OTHER EDUCATIONAL 17 327 NEW STORES/OTHER MERCH BLDGS. 18 328 NEW OTHER NON RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS 19 329 NEW STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BUILDING 2 $44,000 20 434 ADD/ALTER DWELLING/POOLS 38 $609,384.45 21 437 ADD/ALTER NON RESIDENTIAL 2 $1,069,372 22 438 RESIDENTIAL GARAGES/CARPORTS 23 645 DEMOLITION -SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES 6 6 $3,000 24 646 DEMO 2 -FAMILY BUILDINGS 1 2 $500 25 647 DEMO 3-4 FAMILY BUILDINGS 26 648 DEMO 5+ FAMILY BUILDINGS 27 649 DEMO ALL OTHER BUILDINGS 52 $3,153,841.62 TOTAL UNITS ADDED FY 2004-05 TO DATE: 12 TOTAL UNITS DEMOLISHED/LOST FY TO DATE: 13(See Attached List) TOTAL NET UNITS FY TO DATE: -1 FY 2002-03 Total New Dwelling Units: 59 Total Demolished Units: 59 Net Units: 0 2 FY 2003-04 Total New Dwelling Units: 58 Total Demolished Units: 63 Net Units: -5 A • Dwelling Units Demolished/Lost as of September, 2004 ADDRESS TYPE PERMIT DATE PERMIT No. No. OF UNIT 619 10th Street SFR 7/13/04 B04-342 1 111 34th Street 2 -Unit Apartment 7/28/04 B04-379 2 3116 The Strand SFR 8/9/04 B04-392 1 226 31st Street SFR 8/18/04 B04-416 1 634 7th Street SFR 9/9/04 B04-451 1 602 Manhattan Avenue SFR 9/14/04 B04-457 1 2232 Hermosa Avenue Duplex 9/15/04 B04-460 2 2844 El Oeste Street SFR 9/23/04 B04-477 1 1255 10th Street SFR 9/28/04 B04-487 1 430 Longfellow Avenue SFR 9/29/04 B04-488 1 434 Longfellow Avenue SFR 9/29/04 B04-489 1 Total Units Demolished 13 • • October 14, 2004 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL October 26, 2004 ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION SEPTEMBER, 2004 STAFF REPORT PREPARED ., +" SUBJECT • ;. ,+: ..'„ •'' THIS MONTH' , .. .... ; ' THIS MONTH, , ,VAST EY .•x TF,Y To, i.'(DATE, , , ..LAST F,Y ' TO DATE' APPEAL / RECONSIDERATION 0 0 0 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) - CONDOMINIUMS 3 0 6 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) - COMMERCIAL 0 0 0 2 C.U.P./PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2 1 4 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 0 0 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MAP EXTENSION 0 0 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 0 0 FINAL MAP 1 2 1 5 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 0 3 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 0 0 0 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 0 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 0 1 3 5 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 0 1 1 PARKING PLAN 0 1 0 1 SPECIAL STUDY 0 0 0 0 SUBDIVISION 0 0 0 0 TEXT AMENDMENT 0 3 2 7 TRANSIT 0 0 1 1 VARIANCE 0 0 2 0 ZONE CHANGE 0 1 0 3 MISCELLANEOUS 7 9 12 17 TOTAL REPORTS PREPARED 14 18 33 52 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP *Ridership number is counted using different method. 4 PASSENGERS `` ' ''t "' . ` THIS MONTH ' , ,...w P;THIS MONTH„ ,: LAST,:FY , FY To _DATE ,- , ;LAST FYI I,iTo DATE; HERMOSA BEACH 749 637 2,397 2,540 REDONDO BEACH 3,626 4,338 12,976 16,147 SATELLITE 379 399 948 979 *Ridership number is counted using different method. 4 CONCUR: Sol : umenfeld Dire tor Community De elopment Department NOTED: Stephen City Mana f:\b95\cd\activity 5 Respectfully submitted, Y/ -Yin g`Ting Administrative Assistant • November 9, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council • Regular Meeting of October 26, 2004 Department of Community Resources Activity Report for September 2004 The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of September 2004: Recreation Programming: Registration for the Fall/Winter activities and classes opened this month, with many classes full to participant capacity by month's end. Recreation Classes & Programs The most popular youth classes for the first month of registration were `Parent & Me' toddler classes, which included music, dance, and gymnastic specialties. Each of these classes quickly filled to capacity. The most favored adult activities for the first month of registration were Super Star Fitness Boot Camp and the Slow Pitch Softball League. The Friday Night Teen Club reopened its doors this month at the South Park Teen Room. An average of 20 youth participate each evening. Special Events: Fiesta Hermosa The annual Labor Day weekend of festivities took place downtown along Hermosa Avenue, Pier Avenue, and Pier Plaza. The three-day event organized by the Chamber of Commerce, included over three hundred vendors, food booths, children's rides, entertainment stages, and beer garden. California Coastal Clean Up In coordination with Heal the Bay, Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors, and California Coastal Commission, the 20th annual California Coastal Cleanup Day was held. Hermosa Beach participated in the clean up effort as one of 50 sites in Los Angeles County. This annual event made possible by Heal the Bay and hundreds of volunteers is free to the public. The goal is to collect trash and recyclables off the beach to raise awareness and encourage a spirit of community. Star 98.7 was on hand to provide music and prizes to volunteers while they clean up the beach. Over 300 were in attendance. • • America's Walk for Diabetes This annual pass through event is free and open to the public starting and ending in Veterans Park in Redondo Beach. Over 1500 south bay residents participate each year to raise funds and awareness for diabetes. Civic Theatre Events Fees Charged Rentals September 2 Nobel Laureatte Dr. Louis Ignarro held a seminar on heart health and his discovery of the benefits of Nitric Oxide. 200 community members were in attendance. September 12/19/26 Church of Christ held religious services utilizing 8 classrooms and the theater. Over 500 were in attendance for each rental day. Fees Waived Kennedy O'Regan, Adult Basketball September 13- 18 & 23-26 September 27 September 22 Hermosa Arts Foundation Usage:57.5 Kings & Clowns held rehearsals and performances of Romeo & Juliet (54.5) Hermosa Arts Foundation Meeting (3) Beach Cities Christian Fellowship, 80`h Anniversary Celebration (4) Skate Track Hours Rentals 0.00 Private Rentals 186.00 Public Skate Hours Community Center Gymnasium Fee Charged Total Hours Private Rental 9.00 Mike Gooding, Adult Basketball 8.00 Kennedy O'Regan, Adult Basketball 8.00 John Fielder, Adult Basketball 8.00 Oscar Rivera, Adult Basketball 8.00 Steve Kingdon, Adult Basketball 6.00 Emiliano Ortiz, Adult Basketball 8.00 Fred Zaguski, Adult Basketball 6.00 Mike Aaker, Adult Basketball 8.00 Ron Price, Adult Basketball 6.00 David Gordon, Adult Basketball 8.00 John Thuotte, Adult Basketball 1.50 Park Lee, Adult Basketball 4.00 Rick Wood, Adult Basketball 8.00 Paul White, Adult Basketball 8.00 Viet To, Adult Basketball 104.50 Total Hours Fees Charged Fee Waived Mike Campagna 14.00 ARC 8.00 Easter Seals 14.00 Hermosa Beach Fire Department 16.75 Sports League 52.75 Total Hours Fess Waived Community Center Tennis Courts Total Hours Private Rental 50.50 Jeff Abbey 123.00 Adam Burt 39.00 Mike Campagna 22.00 Rick Escalante 42.50 Dave Mahoney 28.00 Scott Smith 38.00 Joe Testa 343.00 Total Hours Fees Charged *Public court use outside of reserved time is first come first serve Community Center Room Rentals Private Rentals Rentals 392.75 Community Center Rooms Lease Agreements Public Skate Hours ARC Rooms 1, 2 & 15 (Not available for rent) Easter Seals Room 4 (Not available for rent) South Bay Youth Project Room 6A (Not available for rent) Hours Rentals 0.00 Private Rentals 261.00 Public Skate Hours Valley Park Picnic Reservations Hours Rental 100.00 20 Resident Bookings Clark Complex Clark Building 34.50 Private Rentals Athletic Field Private Rental 131.50 AYSO 42.00 City Adult Recreation League South Park No Fee Hours Rental 6.00 Private Rental 12.00 Adult Flag Football League 12.00 Youth Volleyball League Excursions: Santa Ynez Windmills & Wineries Tour The Santa Inez Valley is full of blankets of green pastures, peaceful vineyards, historic windmills, horse ranches and orchards, against a backdrop of spectacular mountains. This tour included a private tasting at the Gainey Winery, lunch ir, Solvang, and finally private tasting and guided tour of Fess Parkers Winery and gardens. Thirty-one excursion guests along with our city host attended this excursion. Film Permits: Project Dates Film Days Still Photo September 27-28 2 TV Series September 30 1 Sports Leagues & Tournaments: All fall sports leagues began in the month of September. The City offers five adult sports leagues year round: Basketball, Men's Flag Football, Co -Ed Flag Football, Co-ed Beach Volleyball, Men's Softball, and a series of one day tournaments. Over 400 adults are registered in fall sports leagues with 8 teams in Football, 8 teams in Basketball, 12 teams in Softball, 12 teams in Volleyball, and an average of 50 registered in each tournament. • • Upcoming Events: November 11 November 12 November 28 December 2 December 4 December 11 December 11 December 11 December 31 Veterans Memorial Service Reagan Library Excursion World Aids Day Tree Lighting Ceremony Sand Snowman Contest Sea Slug Youth Surf Series Glendale Centre Theatre Excursion Breakfast with Santa New Year's Eve Celebration 04-05 Donations Donor Event Date Amount Wells Fargo Community Support Campaign Wells Fargo Community Support Campaign Team Program Supplies Sep -04 :$90.00 Team Program Supplies Sep -04 $ 0.00 $120.00 DEPARTMENT REVENUE CURRENT Month THIS MONTH Last Fiscal Year FISCAL YEAR To Date LAST YEAR To Date $93,564 $37,858 $425,613 Revenue FY 2004-05 for 25% of the Fiscal Year is: $425,613 or 64% of the projected figure of $663,950 Donations (in addition to Department Revenue): Expenditures FY 2004-05 for 25% of the Fiscal Year is: $226,960 or 22% of the projected figure of $1,013,593.00 (Respectfully\ Submitted, Chris Valente Administrative Assistant Concur: 1 1 Lisa Lynn Supervisor $248,669 $120.00 Fa Q L. Ns)... • , Coastal€leaflUP picks up 70,000 pounds of trash (CNS) More than 70,000 pounds of trash and 5,000 pounds of . recyclables were picked up from area beaches and waterways Saturday during Heal the Bay's 20th annual California Coastal Cleanup event. About 10,000 volunteers fanned out along more than 50 Los Angeles County beaches and waterways between 9 a.m. and noon. Los Angeles Mayor Jim Hahn and his son, Jackson, 11, helped clean up Dock- weiler State Beach in El Segundo, which is adjacent to Ballona Creek, the Westside's largest watershed and significant conduit for runoff pollution. "It's important that the trash on the beach does not stay on the beach," Hahn said. "We have an obligation to make sure our air is healthy, and our beaches are safe and clean. Thanks to Heal the Bay and all the volunteers for making Coastal Cleanup Day a huge success." The water -quality group concentrated its efforts on inland sites, especially Compton - Creek, one of Los Angeles County's most polluted waterways, according to Mark Gold, the group's -executive director. "Cleanups like this, benefit our commu- nities, as well as our rivers and creeks, and help stop .trash from entering the ocean," Gold said. Among the more unusual items found` were a 6 -foot -tall teddy bear at the Los Angeles River, three coconuts at Dock- weiler state beach, and a bag of pennies and wrenches in Malibu. The California cleanup is part of an in temational Coastal Cleanup event that is observed in all 50 states and more than 10O, nations, according to the state Coastal Commission. For a look at the local effort, see Page 23. Fiesta Hermosa returns (Continued from previous page) on pier plaza and the other in the beer and wine garden. "People come to Fiesta Hermosa again and again for not only the arts, but the music which is always of the highest caliber," -added Merriman. "Our popular beer and wine gar- den offers the microbrews from Union Cattle Company, as well as wine coolers and Cali- fornia wines. All the Fiesta Hermosa ele- ments combine to create an unforgettable weekend for patrons, artists and everyone involved." "This event has been a really popular thing for people of all ages. We wanted bands that appeal to everyone and keep our family focus," explained Merriman. The event will also consist of a petting zoo; a rock -climbing wall; and a kiddie area with rides, games and face -painting booths. The event is free to the public. Although the Hermosa Beach Police will be directing traf- fic, officers recommend walking or riding a bike to the event. The city will turn many parking spaces, normally available along Pier and Hermosa l' avenues into tow -away zones several daystl .. prior to the event so that vendors may set up= their booths. '1 li "t �, For those peole driving; -the city sug ' 3 gests parking at either the Northrop? Grumman lot at the corner of Manhattan' Beach Boulevard and Doolittle Street.iri.i Redondo Beach or at Mira Costa High School in Manhattan Beach. People whe park in these areas may use the free shuttle); service that runs every 15 minutes froi i these locations to the event on all three;;; days from 7:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. The event is scheduled this Labor Day.;; weekend, Sept. 4, 5 and 6, from 10 a.m. to``. 6 p.m. on all three days. For more information on the event, visit.. www.fiestahermosa.com. • • Coastal Cleanup Top, Pat Love, left, and Hermosa Beach Mayor Art Yoon volunteer for last.` Saturday's Heal the Bay Coastal Cleanup next to the Hermosa Beach pier. Above,`;;:. Hermosa Beach residents Amelia and Gillian Moberg help pick up trash left on;, Hermosa Beach. Participants collected more than 70,000 pounds of trash along beaches of Los Angeles County. More than 10,000 volunteers took part (photon by Chris Miller) // Artist Sara Foster shows off the board she cre- ated for the Surfin' Hermosa 2004 art proj- ect benefitting the Hermosa Education Foundation and Hermosa Arts Foundation. The boards were auctioned off to the public last week. (photo by Chris Miller) Surfboards auctioned off (Continued from cover) artists range from 12 years old to 82 years old and, of course, all 20 of the boards were very well-received." Known as the Surfin' Hermosa 2004 project, members of the Hermosa Educa- tion Foundation and the Hermosa Arts Foundation coordinated a - grass-roots art exhibit effort that featured a group of 20 surfboards that were designed by local and nationally recognized artists. "I'd like to publicly thank all the partici- pants and especially the artists who made our project possible," added Koenig. The 20 boards were all auctioned off last Thursday and several of the new owners in- clude Councilman Peter Tucker, who pur- chased two, and the McCurdy family who bought the board painted by Koenig's mother. The project took shape in April thanks to the vision of Shawn Smith, a sixth -grade teacher and assistant principal at Hermosa Valley School. He thought of bringing the idea to the city when he had the chance to observe a similar program in Chicago that began in the summer of 1999. During that time, tourists descended upon Chicago to view an art effort centered on the exFihition of hundreds of fiberglass cows decorated and painted by local members of the city's thriving art community. Dubbed by Chicago city officials as "Cows on Parade," art on the 320 cowl highlighted various themes such, as movies fairy tales and the universe, or were spiredby places, books and famous people,. Both foundations began work on •,the project in February and recruited local artists along with well-known Los Angelett and national artists to design theesign • The groups did so with the help of the proj-.'• ect's main sponsor, Gallery C. As a wayof recognizing the creative donations of thoseii artists who participated in the event, "the foundations hosted an event in honor ipf4, • them at Gallery C in June. Those in atten?F�;. dance had a chance to talk with the artis sem: and learn about the concepts that inspired, their work. "All of the boards are very high-concepfa. art .and they are all very, very different;>': said Arts Foundation board member Jane" Stuart. "We have one board that was done_ by a tattoo artist, we have avant-garde: artists who did some boards for us who have done very well at Gallery C with open inns there. We had some illustrators, too, so we really had an incredible range of art- work that was on display." The Beach Reporter • September 2, 2004. 17 EPT: 4, 5, b Pier and Hermosa ;Avenues The Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau proudly presents the 32nd year of FIESTA HERMOSA LABOR DAY 2004 "The largest arts and crafts show in Southern California" There's something for everyone at Fiesta Hermosa! You can shop till you drop with over 270 artists, and craftsmen, including painters, photographers, jewelers, glassblowers, clothiers, ceramic artists, sculptors, and more! You'll find your favorite artists from past shows, as well as a host of new, and different artists who are new to our area. Plus, don't miss these other attractions! Beer and Wine Garden Local non-profit organiza- tions Rotary, Kiwanis, and Aloha Days will be serving up local microbrens.by Union Cattle Company and your favorite premium wines and refreshing cool- ers. It's the place to see and be seen, and is always rocking to the live music onstage. The South Bay's favorite tribute bands will be rockin' live onstage from 11 to 7 daily. Restaurant Cantina Some folks claim that tthe food is the best p f the fair! We've got Thai, Chinese, Pizza, Tri -Tip, Burgers, Greek, Sausages, and the Hermosa Beach Lifeguard's Famous Fish Tacos. Plus, we've got Street Vendors with Candy Apples, Popcorn, Ice Cream, Lemonade, roasted corn on the cob, Cotton Candy, and more.! Bring your appetites! Carnival Rides & Games The kids will enjoy the variety . of rides, amuse- ments, and street \Pns, bal- loon perform- ers including Zoon artists and face - painters. Crafters with games and. costumes are located near the amuse- ment section, which is located on 11th Court just south of the Restaurant Cantina and only one block from the Beach. Petting Zoo for the Kids Our ever -popular petting zoo is the place for dads with cameras and kids who love to snuggle with furry and fantastic creatures. From small creatures like baby goats, sheep, and piggies to large animals like camels and ponies, the Entertainment Schedule: iii kids will love getting "up close and personal" with their barnyard favorites. den 11th St. &Strand Pier Plaza Sta Beer= Saturday September 4 11-2 "HARD RAIN" - Popular local favorites Andy and Renee 3-6. "CLASSIC ROCKERS" - Tunes of the 60's and 70's Sunday September 5 11-2 "GREG- WRIGHT" - Rockin' Louisiana Blues. 3-6 "TOTALLY 80'S" - Your favorite R&R hits from the 80's Monday September 6 11-2 "SOUL SACRIFICE" - Santana tribute band 3-6 "2ND MANASSAS" - Credence Clearwater Revival e - Pier Ave & Strand Saturday September 4 11-2 "DIA OND CUTTERS _ - Neil Diamond tribute band 3-6 "DANNY D. ORCHESTRA" - Frank Sinatra tribute band Sunday September 5 '11-2 "PRETZEL LOGIC" - Steely Dan tribute band 3-6 "PEACE FROG" - Doors tribute band Monday September 6 Stills & Nash tribute band 11-2 "4 WAY STREET" - Crosby,elfin tribute band 3-6 "LED ZEPAGAIN" - Led Zeppelin tribute band from the TRW/Northrup Grumman Parking Shuttle buses run from 7:30 am to 7:30 pm on all three days! Free parking and shuttles are available Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Doolittle Streets from the Mira Costa High School Lot on Artesia at Peck. Lot on M The following are proud s Arc of Life Chiropractic Daily Breeze Flashcast I & E Cabinets International Creative Artists Inside Out Chiropractic Virtually Wireless Kari Hawkins, Chiropractor Richard Schwarz, Chiropractic 24 Hour Fitness ponsors of Fiesta Hermosa: Los Angeles Times Marriott Vacation Club National Association d of the • Self -Employed Premier Laser Sight Senegence/Lipsense Globo International Shell Vacation Club Orange Super Chamois The Kitchen Connection Uuacanlie toncer 2lockwise from above, concert organizer Tom Campbell addresses the crowd before und-raising concert Tuesday at the Hermosa Beach Playhouse; performer Sam Phillip ,pened the show; and Bruce Cockburn followed with an acoustic set. (photos b)• Chris Miiie. • • Fiesta Hermosaret111'11Labor Day weekend s by Whitney Youngs Roughly 100,000 people will make their way down to Hermosa Beach this Labor Day weekend as the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce will once again host the biannual Fiesta Hermosa that draws crowds to the city's downtown area. Now in its 32nd year, the three-day af- fair will feature 270 arts and crafts vendors, live entertainment and a smorgas- bord of diverse food. This year's event is set for Sept. 4, 5 and 6. The festivities are expected to attract an estimated 40,000 people each day to areas along lower Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue and on pier plaza. "With the majestic ocean as a backdrop, Hermosa Beach is an ideal place for a sum- mer festival," said Carla Merriman, the chamber's executive director. "It combines the best fine artisans and crafters with ad- ditional opportunities to swim, bike, fish or just relax on the beach." . The Fiesta Hermosa is held on both Memorial and Labor Day weekends, and serves as the chamber's primary source of income which funds overhead costs of the.organization. According to Merriman, the: chamber nets more than $100,000 during Memorial ,Day weekend and hopes to raise the same amount during the Labor Day:holiday._,-: "The"=money goes to fundour daily operations," explained Merriman. "We are hopeful that this fair will be as profitable and the more people who come, the better?' The event also enables various local nonprofit groups to set up booths free of charge and raise money for their causes. Last year, these organizations raised an estimated $20,000. "We have given free booth space to Aloha Days, the Hermosa Beach Historical Society, the St.- Patrick's Day Parade committee and the Sister City Association along with the Police and Fire depart- ments?' said Merriman. "It has become a really good fund-raiser for This Labor Day weeken Fiesta Hermosa that att d, the Chamber of Commerce will once again host othe biannual by Chris Miler) racts thousands to town. the Hermosa Beach -based charities." The arts and crafts -booths will feature jewelry, ceramics, wood- work, hand -blown and stained glass pieces, sculptures, leather acces- sories, oil and watercolor paintings, and photography. About 30 food booths located in parking lot "A" near 11th Street just west of Hermosa Avenue will feature a medley of diverse dishes from local restaurants. "Those in attendance will have the chance to taste ethnic favorites, barbecue and dishes from some of the most popular restaurants in Hermosa Beach," said Merriman. Numerous bands play the blues, country, funk, jazz -fusion and R&B with the music of popular artists featured by way of a Frank Sinatra, Neil Diamond, Steely Dan, The Doors, Led Zeppelin and Crosby, Stills and Nash, Santana and Credence Clearwater Revival tribute band. The live music will take place on two sound stages, one (Please turn to next page) The last of three Hermosa Art Walks will be held Thursday, Aug. 26, from 5 to 9 p.m. in the 300, 400 and 500 blocks of Pier Avenue. Pat Turner, left, and Mike Woodward displayed their work at the first walk. owe beach concert scrapped • her l . Ycement rOn- af.or sically cancel the show due to what it de- .t3�S'{ syv e -. s loo vas. i . 'F7 -at e w111 0t •sl • I Eth= sun Beach tlus<fth at_ oou' veelc‘that•lm ress,w 11 i free public:concer at he each. Sept. 23. Although American Express decided to ba- HERMOSA BEACH x`Rome'o and Juliet'+ ' Romeo and Juliet, willbe presented by Kings ;and Clowns•nn Tranung''outh theater group at the Hermosa ,Beach` Playhouse, 710 Pier Ave., Hermosa Beach Show;tifile s are 7:30 p.m. ;Sept 24;aiid 25;'2:30 pt#nSept. 26. Tickets are $15.adults, -$10 students and seniors. Call 3741075 for more information. scribed as, "... a shift in a number of key busi- ness priorities for fall 2004, including new projects that require us to reallocate our mar- keting resources," it did agree to make good on its commitment to pay the city $75,000 for hosting the event. "We greatly appreciate the city of Hermosa (Please turn to Page 25) H.B. bus trip to Santa Ynez Sept. 18 The city of Hermosa Beach is organizing a bus trip to two Wineries in the Santa Ynez Valley for Saturday, Sept. 18, from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. The cost is $45 for Hermosa residents and $50 for nonresidents. Lunch will he available in Solvang. The deadline to register is Sept. 6. Sign up at the Community Center, 710 Pier Ave. or call 318-0265 for more information. I.B. concert cancelled (Continued from cover) Beach's support of the project, and value the extensive efforts of individuals like you to help bring the event to fruition," stated Nancy Smith, vice president of Global Media and Sponsorship for American Express. "Further, we realize the inconvenience of postponing community activities and proj- ects in order to accommodate our event, and are sensitive to the disappointment of the community that the event will not go on as intended." At a special meeting Aug. 13, the Hermosa Beach City Council unanimously voted to approve the free concert that would have featured Grammy -winning singer/songwriter Sheryl Crow and a few of her friends that could have included guitarists/singers Eric Clapton and John Mayer, singer Sarah McLachlan or the country pop trio The Dixie Chicks. At the meeting. the council added into the agreement an amendment that the city receive a minimum of.$75,000 to host the Thursday evening show, along with $25,000 for over,. head costs. "I'm sorry to see the concert canceled but I am pleased that American Express will still' meet its commitment," said Coun- cilman J.R. Reviczky. "This speaks very highly of it. Maybe we could not have another one (joked Reviczky). I know that many of our' merchants are disappointed and that most of the hotels were sold out for that evening. Maybe next time." IMG, American Express and Momentum were to sponsor and organize the "Blue Beach" concert that_ was supposed to take place on the north side of the city's pier. ' - At its regular meeting Aug. 10, the council agreed to fur- ther discuss the idea of a free concert during a special meeting following James Leitz's, IMG's Los Angeles division vice president, last-minute_ submittal for IMG, the marketing com- pany in charge of organizing the event. Since the proposal was not a formal item on the regular agenda but required immediate action .because of the time - sensitive nature of the event, the council voted to host the spe- cial meeting which barely fell into adherence with its 72 -hour deadline of noticing public city forums. In a 4-0 vote, the City Council OK'd the event. However, it included in its motion a few condition of its own. With its vote of approval, council members' required that the city re- ceive at least $75,000 and requested the drafting of two or three different contingency plans that would be ready for im- plementation if more people than expected showed up for the concert. If the overhead costs amounted to more than $25,000 the City Council was to hold IMG responsible for the added costs. Councilman and full-time lawyer Sam Edgerton was not present at the meeting since he abstained from the vote at the recommendation of City Attorney Mike Jenkins since one of the concert's sponsors, American Express, is a client of Edgerton's. With a 10,000 to 20,000 anticipated drawl, IMG agreed to hire at least 60 unarmed security guards specializing in concerts. The event was -supposed to be general admission seating in a makeshift venue of 240,000 square feet equipped with a backstage area, general seating, and VIP and media areas. IMG was not selling any seats to the concert but earmarked a section of the venue as VIP that would have been reserved for American Express cardholders and anyone else sponsors wished to invite: The opening act was set to perform at 6:30 p.m. with Crow and friends going on at 8:20 p.m. and playing until 10 p.m. • ' . 'The same -event was organized in New York City's Central Park and Chicago's Grant Park. American Express Blue spon- sors the concert as a way to feature a popular beach locale and famed musicians to bring awareness of its fund-raising effort called Blue for Music. The series of free concerts began five years ago with Sheryl Crow and a few friends in Central Park, a live performance that was later released on CD. This year's performance is aimed at celebrating the five-year mark by re-creating the con- cert on the West Coast. American Express Blue works with the VH1 Save The Music Foundation, an effort dedicated to ensuring that all children have access to a quality., education which entails music. The VH1 Save The Music'Eoundation has provided more than $25 million worth of instruments to public schools in 80 cities nationwide delivering musical instruction to 500,000 elementary school students. • Church's 80th (Continued from previous page) the Church of the Nazarene, which was es- ' tablished in the early 1800s. According to longtime and former mem- bers, one of the most noteworthy aspects about Beach Cities Christian Fellowship is its impressive music program. The church is also known for its outreach programs aiding the less fortunate, Sunday school and youth groups. Pastor James Goss became a member of the church in 1956 after moving to. Califor- nia at the age of 18. He graduated from Pasadena Nazarene College and his first job was as pastor at a church in El Segundo that is no longer in existence. At that time, the music program was under the supervision of music director John Umphrey, who: hosted his own music radio program that_broadcast in Los Angeles. "Many men my age who were members of the church at the time were called in :the ministry by Wayne C. Jones," said'Goss. "The most special physical aspect ;of the church is the baptistery where I.was;bap- tized. Of course, the music program was al- ways wonderful. We had an organist who was'a concert pianist." Longtime resident Dorothy Heaton•origi- nally from Kansas, migrated to the South Bay and joined the church. She remembers when the membership dwindled down. to -10 for a short time. "The woman who lived across the .street from my husband and I, her name ,was „Alice and she was a member .who had a beautiful voice, and we used to love to hear her sing in church," she recalled. . The celebration is slated this Saturday, Sept. 19, from 3:30 to 5 p.m. The services at the Playhouse will follow with a reception at the church. The 20th annual Coastal Cleanup Day will be held Saturday, Sept. 18, from 9 a.m. to - noon. In the beach cities, cleanup sites are at Dockweiler Beach at Imperial and Vista del Mar, the south side of the Manhattan Beach pier, the Hermosa Beach pier and the first tower south of the Redondo Beach pier. For more information, call Heal the Bay at (800) 432-5229. 24 • The Beach Reporter • September 23, 2004 Victor ns lowship Come join as:in(`experiencing the, uncompromising and living Word of God. 'Learn how to tap -into the power of God and overcome life -'s obstacles. • Victory in Christ Fellowship Where: Hermosa Beach Community Center, 2"d F1oor,Rm. 4 When: Tuesday nights at 7:00 p.m. (310) 610-0084 The first Hermosa Beach Shorts Film Festival was held last weekend at the Hermosa Beach Playhouse. On hand for the festivities were, at left seated, Maggie Moir, Sherrill Paris and Rick Koenig, and standing Megan Moir -Waddell, Gerard Ravel, Matt Raymond, Christine Hollander and Laura Raymond; pictured above from left are Sheri Clemente, Simon Cohen, Leigh Folsom and Robb Boyd. (photos by Chris Miller) • • Local churchtelebrates 80 yews this Sunday by Whitney Youngs ncorporated in January of 1907, Hermosa Beach has grown_ from a tiny seaside town to a thriving beach community.• , Many of its organizations, traditions and buildings have survived along the way. One of those groups and buildings is Beach Cities Christian Fellowship Church, which has been around almost as long as the city and will celebrate its 80th birthday this Sunday at the Hermosa Playhouse. "Mayor Art Yoon is attending with a proclamation, and we have two former pastors who will be there. One who was pas- tor for 10 years, his name is Scott Bullock, and one who was the pastor about 30 years ago, his name is Chuck Smith;' said the church's current pastor, Steve Lewis. "We will have a lot of upbeat music and the two pastors will talk about the days when they were here. I will speak, as well, on the future of the church" According to Lewis, who has been with this particular church for the past three years, the church building itself was built in September of 1924. It has yet to undergo any major renovations and church officials are currently involved in a planning phase to remodel it. Smith, who presided over the church from 1976 to 1979 and now lives and continues to pastor in the San Fernando Valley, lived in orie of the two houses adjacent to the church. The church has since sold that land as a way to pay for the remodel of its parking lot. "Over the years, many leaders have come out of that church. Some have gone on to become pastors themselves," said Smith. "As the- • years moved on and with the rise in property values, many people, es- peciallyelderly widows, left town for other cities and that was diffi- cult for the -congregation. The church was very blessed to always have had a wonderful music program, which I think_ helped in gaining new 'limbers." The church was originally called Hermosa Beach Church of the Senior pastor Steve Lewis and associate pastor Mike Maynard will host the 80th birthday celebration of the Beach Cities Christian Fellowship Church at the Hermosa Playhouse this Sunday. (photo by Chris Miller) Where Far Art Thou? 'Romeo and Juliet,' will be performed by Kings and Clowns in Training, a community theater group for students -ages 13-20, at the Hermosa Beach Playhouse. A special school preview will be held at 6:30 p.m. with a question and answer session. 55. Additional showings are at 7:30 p.m. Sept. 17,18, 24 and 25. 2:30 p.m. Sept. 26. 515 adults. $10 students. (310) 542-8193. Nazarene and about 13 years ago the name was changed to its current title. The church currently has a membership of about 180 people with an average of 160 attending services every week. Lewis has been a member of the Church of the Nazarene for the past 30 years. "Last Easter, we had a Good Friday service in which we, our con- gregation, carried an 8 -foot cross down Pier Avenue to the beach and performed a community service," said Lewis. "It's good feeling to know the church has been here a long time and to know that there is that kind of security here" According to Smith, this particular denomination is affiliated with (Please turn to next page) ■ `Romeo and Juliet' "Romeo and Juliet" will be presented by Kings and Clowns in Training youth theater group at the Hermosa Beach Playhouse, 710 Pier Ave., Hermosa Beach. Show times are 7:30 p.m. Sept. 17, 18, 24 and 25; 2:30 p.m. Sept. 26. Beach cleanup Mayor Art Yoon has invited anyone and everyone to meet at the city pier for a beach cleanup 9 a.m. to noon Saturday, Sept. 18. Heal the Bay staff and volun- teers will be on hand for the Coastal 'Cleanup Day.: 411 cleanup supplies will be provided. Star 98.7 radio planned to broadcast live from the pier dunng -the event, Yoon said. For more information call 937-4275. Tournament football °n the Sand football 7ournnd 2 girls) flag nyyleifemale . 4 a 4 co-ed 12 guys l sign-ups welcome, malel at ran- dom Individual All teams picked teed a rrur�i- dDraw.encouraged.e guaranteed filled. co-registrationd Draw• Teams arg dom via two Registration is open until on-site mum of two games. unity Center 310) at the Community t and the Beach (143. Register early 14th B 877-3 , day at the beach. Chris Jhang t pees: 7-3 48. Lo 0280. Director. the Strand 10th Street and n game day. I player 520 per play ' player or WALKING THE TALK SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA'S ONLY Boot Camp Spearheaded, Owned and Operated by a Vi Armed Forces Physical Fitness School Graduate ::: (g Year Army Combat Veteran) IIl�TI4S,��II superSTAR FITNESS' Our training environment inspires maximum participation, promotes personal satisfaction and supports and moulds healthy lifestyles. WHEN: 6:ooam - 7:ooam & 7:15am - 8:15am WHERE: Hermosa Beach & South Redondo Beach 4 WEEKS @ 3 DAYS PER WEEK = MEASURABLE RESULTS! GET IN THE BEST SHAPE OF YOUR LIFE AND HAVE LOTS OF FUN DURING THE PROCESS! CLASSES ARE FORMING NOW! CLASS SIZES ARE LIMITED Our mission and passion at superSTAR FITNESS is to educate, motivate and assist you in achieving the results you desire and then take you one step beyond". "NEVER QUIT"! Our fitness programs produce unmatched RESULTS that you will see and feel in as little as four weeks! superSTAR FITNESS Boot Camp is a co-ed, outdoor, fun and challenging total body Fitness program designed and proven to deliver maximum results in the shortest amount of time possible. We focus on "TBF-Total Body Fitness to include: C.O.R.E & Functional Training, Cardiorespiratory Conditioning, Body Sculpting/Toning, Flexibility Enhancement and Muscular Strength & Endurance. DESIGNED FOR ALL FITNESS LEVELS • One -On -One Personal Training Available WWW.SSFITNESS.COM FOR MORE INFO! • - ALEC`HUNTER .: ; • Chief instructor/Founder;• S ARMY MASTER FITNESS TRAINER Intc;n; onaliy acdaimed celebiity fitness consultant as • featured in CLEO Magazine, Aug. zoo4 CALL 310.226-2800•OR LOGON TO California Coastal Clean Up Hermosa Beach is one of the 50 sites in LA County participating in this Statewide clean up effort. Meet at the Hermosa Beach Pier and join many families, friends, organizations, boatels, and kayakers making a difference at your local beach! Plastic gloves and trash bags are provided. For more information con- tact Heal the Bay at 1 -800 -HEAL -BAY. m Coastal Cleanup Day The 20th annual Coastal Cleanup Day will be held Saturday. Sept. 18, from 9 a.nt. to noon. In the beach cities. cleanup sites are at Dockueiler Beach at Imperial and Vista del Mar, the south side of the Manhattan Beach pier. the Hermosa Beach pier and the first tower south of the Redondo Beach pier. For more information, call Heal the Bay at (800) 432-5229. Volleyball classes begin today Bill Sigler's Beach Volleyball classes today from 6-7:30 p.m. at Eighth Street in Hermosa Beach. Classes are held every Thursday for six weeks. The beginner/intermediate group works on passing, setting, serv- ing and some hitting. The advanced group works on shots and hitting, side out strategy, hand setting and defense. For more details see www.SmackSportswea-F-com/pro- mos.html. 0 M Youth basketball programs taught in Hermosa Indiana University basketball player Matt Hermes, along with former colle- giate hoopster and certified teaching is s instructor Adam Burt, arebasketball fundamentals class in BagSept.inning Thebof the Theprogram coversall aspect game: from passing, shooting and ball handling to lplayerseand mee teamwork. 6 -9 -year-old from 3-4 p.m.; 10 -12 -year-olds from 4-1 p.tin. at the Hermosa Beach Communitl Center Gym. Participants must bring basketball to every class. - Fees are $72/$67 resident discooubt f c the six-week class, with a minimum 15 students tact class. 393 ore i form; st tion, http://www.adamburt.com. Winery Excursion Registration closes for City of Hermosa's tour to Santa Ynez Windmills & Wineries. This tour will include stops at wineries and lunch. $50 non -Hermosa resident. $45 for Hermosa residents. Trip will be Sept. 18. from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. (310) 318-0265. "Surfing Safari,- by Hermosa gallery owner Ken Klade (rightjis4 among the 20 surfboard canvases that will be auctioned p4f;-1; tonight at Sangria restaurant on Hermosa's Pier Plaza. Proce;l will benefit the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation and OF -1 Hermosa Beach Arts Foundation. Tickets are $10. Reservation may be made by visiting www.hbefcom Saturday, Sept. 4 Fiesta Hermosa The annual Labor Day weekend of festiviti• es' will take place in downtown Hermosa along; Hermosa Avenue, Pier Avenue and Pier Plaza:4 The three-day event, organized by the i Chamber of Commerce, will include over 300.11 vendors, food booths, children's rides, enter.] tainment stages and beer garden. For more I information contact (310( 374-9773 or visit the -:x website at www.fiestahermosa.com. • Learn From The Pros Bill Sigler's Beach Volleyball class begins again. Bill has been teaching beach VB since 1994 and has coached all levels, includ-" ing some of the top pros. For more details or to sign up visit wwwSmackSportswear.com/pro= mos.html. 5. Sunday Sept. 12 t'1 CBVA Beach Volleyball Tournament The California Beach Volleyball Association presents'.' tournaments on the North side of the Hermosa Pier '; t' Contact League Director Chris Brown for more information at (310) 374-5902 or visit the website for upcoming events at www.cbva.com. 10 Hermosa Beach About' Town Fiesta Hermosa The Chamber of Commerce is geared for the bi-annual Fiesta Hermosa downtown arts and crafts fair. The largest of its kind in Southern California, according to the chamber, handles 270 vendors who sell things from fine art to hand craft- ed refrigerator magnets. Other booth space is sold to sponsors to . pay for the event, said Carla Merriman, Chamber of Commerce president. The fair includes two music stages, one at the Pier head and another in a Fiesta beer garden, fea- turing music of all genres through- out the three-day event. There are also small carnival rides for the kids as well as a petting zoo. Fairgoers are offered the option of parking out of town and taking a shut- tle bus downtown throughout the event, which spans the three-day weekend. Wave busses will shuttle passengers from the TRW/Northrop Grumman R-5 parking lot at the inter- section of Manhattan Beach Boulevard .. and . - Doolittle Drive, Redondo Beach. Shuttle bus parking also is available at Mira Costa High School. WiFi Hermosa Beach Class Get Connected to WiFi Hermosa Beach. This free class will teach you how to connect to and use the City Wireless Internet Bandwidth. Learn more about how the system works and where the system ' works. 7 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach. This class will be televised live on Adelphia - Channel 8. For more info: www.wifihermosabeach.corn Surfboard Auction 20 Surfin' Hermosa 2004 surfboards will be sold to the highest bidder at the live auction featuring auc- tioneer John Kunkle. 7 to 9 p.m. at Sangria,68 Pier Ave., Hermosa Beach. Make your reservation at i www.hbef.com. Reservations are $10 per person. Reserve early as seating is limited. If you are unable to attend the auction and would like to submit a bid, please visit our website, www.hbef.com, for infor mation. All proceeds from the auction will benefit the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation and the Hermosa Arts Foundation. Garden Club A presentation entitled 'Salvias' by landscape designer Rick Dykseul will be at the Hermosa Garden Club. 10 a.m. Clark Stadium, 861 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach. 22 • The Beach Reporter • September 10, 2004 Fiesta Hermosa brings the heat (photos by Clir•is Miller) Sweltering heat did not deter tens of thousands from jamming the streets of Hermosa Beach for last weekend's annual summer farewell bash Fiesta Hermosa. At left, from top to bottom, arts and crafts and other consumer goods were displayed under hot and sunny skies Above, from top to bottom, Andy and Anika Donatelli, and friend Rosemary Clifton, befriend little lambs at the Fiesta Hermosa petting zoo; patrons on the Pier Plaza enjoy the music of Steely Dan as performed by the Steely Dan Cover Band; and Nico Ruffolo collects his numbered frog in the children's game arca. Valley's parkin:.': (Continued from' Page 10) "Some. type of restriction to create turnover is needed. I think there is a prob- lem because those spots are always filled up so people look for spots in the neigh-: borhood,' aid Commissioner Robert Beste. The time limit restriction would only be in effect weekends from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m: The commission's vote serves as a recom- mendation to the City Council which :re- serves final judgment on the matter. "During the week there really is no problem. It's only on the weekend and if there is nothing wrong then there is no rea= son to fix something," said resident Alan Carter who lives in the immediate area. "Everyone in this room is fully aware that in Hermosa Beach parking is a real prob. lem so if you are considering something): suggest it just be for the weekend." According to Morgan, on the south: side of Gould Avenue there are about 25 90 -degree stalls and five parallel spots; along the curb adjacent to Valley Drive:_; The latter are spots which were created: with the park renovation. "The parking has been there a long timet and the residents have enjoyed that.:Ob2A viously there is a lot of concern ajliput,- parking in that area, so it's a sensitive_ it and I wanted to hear from the pubhc<on this," Morgan said. "We want to talk about options that would satisfy everybodjr� think any option for parking restrictions•. would include still allowing residence 1: parking overnight." Valley Park reopened last September: following a multimillion -dollar renovation project that added a full-size basketball: court, a regulation -size soccer field, ADA --A compliant walkways, park benches aid tables. . "I would like to state one thing I learned:, in speaking to residents in the area. The:- park is wonderful and we all enjoy it butit has created a problem now that everyone'js, visiting the park from different areas:,: There is an enormous problem with people'' looking for spots by the park on ours blocks," said 27th Street resident Jerry Vasquez. Also a part of the project, the city funded the construction of two different playground areas, one for toddlers and one for older children that comprise swings,` jungle gyms with slides and ladders. "My wife and I built our house here 50 years ago so we've been around for a few years and Hermosa -Beach has a parking problem." said Gould Avenue resident John Horn. "I don't think you need to change the parking in the area but I don't think it's fair to take away.ourparking in a sense be cause "we don't have arty on ourstde of th, street and a lot of-us;;do;utilize the spot quite often." Cointiiissioners Victor'.Winnek an, ' :Richard Applebaum were absent from las ;Wednesday's meeting. A •.;bY..Whitfley YOUngg cation benefit oard auction " • The Hermosa Arts Foundation .and the 7Hetmosa EdaddtiOn•Foim-._: dation celehratedgreat . success last *eel( Niihen the • two -•hcinpiofits •-• • - • tioned off 20 custom-designed surfboards, rakingin a gross,amount of about. $37,000.• The earnings earnings;V011•,.he•plit amonghe two •;• :• organizations. "Our ultimate goal was to benefit our children's education and the arts -in Hermosa," said Arts Foundation Presi- dent Rick Koenig. "Hermosa Beach witnessed firsthand the wealth of artists' tal- ents we have here in our community. Our (Please turn to Page 21) HERMOSA BEACH '..'11111Hermosa Garden Club -The Hermosa Garden Club will meet at 10 a.m. .--,NVednesdaY,-.Sept. 15, at Clark Stadium, 861 will be a .4.yalley..Drive,-.1-1ennosa Beach..There "i-esentaiion on growing salvias'. For more in :... ! formation; call Diane at530::6992. _ • '1 • '. • , - i . ,cdi-':. ,....0.N.1: : 1 nC::11:11:7:1.: 1?!:s, ::i:1 19' .efil..41ts .1.:7'inif' " a:. . e15!1 fat.iwrth:/. Ile, . .gr h.?tlai:' s' '''':itI' 11: a:;*;. 7 ' r,,. :-.:- i ne' :' s:7:ti::::: ":hi:::::y:Y:O.:1,utr.„,pn.,,g.bsipc.11fp •"-X - ,,,..., 40:23'0. v:iiie. p:ii1:::isi ii:::::nlitft51t:§:cills.:ate: i : • , :::::':;::::::P:Elbfili::&:ti;tt:argilaelk ir: II apgYijardsf_1::::::::!E;111:7:1u7:::;:i i-fi4:iiiV.,:#066liA....,0ty..,111y,:P4.,1. a tpthflar'!reel'ihssn!:7lb,:.el:.n.,1::?abl'3g.,77:1:;::-..g.r:ei:sityndce::ft:pRar 1: 'll'i etiand,that th11aJ au; ..).: , '43'4'51(=i- ciavailad, . hig'spaces r,'e-1.11(en11P .,, - .• .: ing;fio rn ihe'siirrounding • PublicWOrks Director= Richard l'Adigg. :area,":sta7, 1 The commission agr,e6dta a‘for711194u1::; , amp limit 'foik.spaces along ValleY:rilik; .• frorii"the Kis'vanisClub to Gould A •Iieliii!", ,...along with f;i7, new spaces that 1,verCcre: project , ated -inithe Walley :Pa,r1c'.i-en6:7,a,ifip - • - (Pleaseturnto Page Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, SEPTEMBER 2004 October 18, 2004 City Council Meeting of October 26, 2004 STATISTICAL SECTION Finance Administration CURRENT,. THIS MONTH. LAST FY - 4 .-FISCALE.YEAR: TODATE• • LASTRISCAL MONTH YR,,TO:DATE rAVERAGETOT OCCUPANCWRATE .1. 'Quarter- •, # •(November _ • " " 4,••• e kr' INVOICES/ACCOUNTS., • ,‘ LRECEIVABLE * 75 -261 IIMAPPPR•e.9* •••••••••• ••••••41•••••••••••••••••••.,.x,.-,....,- '.211 b '... - "2 658. ' . ' ,-, - -,2 456.- - ‘..,..i' 41: 80081 CASH -REGISTER, .71,T ' •i 4,-1'03e WS C T1 N 5. f •-••••••.4•89,1.,MT , r.••••••••••••••.10,1r,11, te,..r,•,,tran,70...oramou .,CHECKSASSUED,,:.:•*,„ -10�i7 1,008 ree eeeeee-e..4 1411ktHAttbRDERS' . , , -.125• 154 ' "- • ``:".1":*- 48Z- • •, 543 *Of •••••,...• DISCOUNTS TAKEN $210:44 "34!.t $143180 '6383.45 r - LANDSCAPE/ST. LIGHT r • .2 • „, •• .„,.- • 13, a I 16 • REBATES (200 Tax Yr.) . 4 I ,•1 lUUT EXEMPTIONS T9. DATE PAYROLL – — Full Time Employees ' • - 1 , Part Time Employees .(*". (3)1 ,4171,.,, 2Y1,379 • 130 59 • 1 137 43 • IA, f/b95/finance 1 /finactivityTOT.doc Finance Cashier .-61-TATION PAYME CURPENT1' , • •-• MONTH 1THIS:MONTI-V '-.0-1:AsT FY r FISCAL YEAR, Tti DATE - LASTFISCAL YR. TO,DATE, '3 346me+ • 3463 11 065 •;..; 10,701 - ,,,,,, ,T ' It,,,,,-.04,..1.4,-TY'IrT", , ''T ...I PAYTITO.TTY••••,1/0"1.,.. • .I. . I.,...ir VOPP ••.....' T •1,4 ••••,••• 1,070 : DMV PAYMENTS . - „, - ,e .. ''6-• ,.. r , ' .„,:- . ......,..-: .,DELINQUENTI,..NOTICES. 4. , . ' ' ,,. '.r"..-',1";-. 1 ' 'ut Mt ,, T. 2,243 1,801 6,575 6,293 284 ,,,......., ..... 176 741 726 .......,.,....„....— 52.••••7- . ,.. 1 977' '' ., - 7116. E. ‘ i DISMISSALS,„ „ . J.,.,. • . •269 210. . ,- 824•-: • - 753 ...........„ _,___.__„,„„,,f.....„.....„............ _-- rElOOTING" REVENUE. -.., -. , `-----7..-. ..- .$7172 $1 881 --'.----$11i66irr ' 92,88i '- ..... . r•,,......_ ... ..., ..............i.s.......--,-.-..-o•*.-vel..-a,t-r.re.....r•:o....aL..,.....,#i.:sg*......- ..........-21.-.-sts•41, cr. r- .. •.i ' 4,-... P... 4. P Salk,. a wt., rliAkkr0 PEAMITS7-77"—r."--''.7'-. '7774 --"1"-.7—, ---7,1- r—"" ...4i Driveway 2 2 12 Guest Party Passes 365 3691,783 2,082 Temp. Res. Passes 0 0 40 465 Contractor 43 37 161 151 Daily 6 9 _ 19 42 Annual:Preferential, . ..-- il..,2, L. ..--P,....................... Transferable 80 43 210 218 Vehicle 176 134 441 448 F-------11---.,7-TOTAL: .” "'r . ..". 1 256 ' --;, ,- 77 1 • .,. , —..-- -- ,651 - rt 666 I ,,,,,, .4;.4. rorometv..41,4n4......r—aez,,,,,m4,4..44lawn-,..,4,..-- T".•••••••••••••••T,r..." ..,,T , .e.,,,r4.......*•••••••• • I. 4-..,..........- gn1:6___.....,...........—...-.n.....i. .4..............:: ,.... ...A. a..,-.......... ....... 4 i 1 r t • ' • '/-- ,.. 44' California Out of State ,„ MTA ,SES AO "Li, 10 1:71-1.7-V6V6FIE11--"--"S°L:D " IT 3 01. 20,-, TtmA3t I VOUCHERS USED ."4- 302- 3014 ,- 761 CASH KEYS:SOLD 1. '1„6 _ _ 28, *MOO. 'CASH -KEY REVENUE $160 $140 $1 290 ,ANIMAL LICENSES. - • : 270- 118 :313. 156 BUSIPESS LICENSES Licenses Issued 203 307 618 762 ednue $42 ,86472'2 St7,6:11 --$164,916724 --$188;995174 ; ••••••••••• NOTED: 7 r, Steph rrell, City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted: iki Copeland, Finance Director f:/b95/finance I /finactivityTOT.doc • • HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2004 SEPTEMBER AMBULANCE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 SEPTEMBER INV BILL .� ,STTJSTICS. THIS MO. THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION FOR EMS MO. LAST F/Y DATE ORIGINAL INSPECTION MO. DATE TO DATE RES. COMMERCIAL 18 91 22 341 ASSEMBLY 0 0 0 5 INSTITUTIONS • 0 0 0 3 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 0 21 APARTMENTS 0 2 0 65 RE -INSPECTION COMMERCIAL 0 23 23 119 ASSEMBLY 0 0 0 1 INSTITUTIONS 0 0 0 4 INDUSTRIAL 0 1 0 11 APARTMENTS 0 8 1 63 OCCUPANCY LOAD 0 0 0 2 CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 0 5 1 _ _ AMBULANCE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 SEPTEMBER INV BILL THIS THIS MO. F/Y TO LAST F/Y THIS F/Y TO LAST F/Y FOR EMS MO. LAST F/Y DATE TO DATE MO. DATE TO DATE RES. 41 37 117 113 $11,521 $32,117 $30,623 NON -RES. 25 17 80 32 $14,025 $43,780 $35,706 TOTALS 66 54 197 145 $25,546 $75,897 $66,329 Respectfu y Submitted: RUSSEL GLEY, FIRE CHIEF Noted: it STEVE BURgELL, I ANAGER • • Incidents by Time of Day Date Range: From 01/01/2004 To 09/30/2004 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 Time of Day Number of Incidents 00:00:00 to 00:59:59 01:00:00 to 01:59:59 02:00:00 to 02:59:59 03:00:00 to 03:59:59 04:00:00 to 04:59:59 05:00:00 to 05:59:59 06:00:00 to 06:59:59 07:00:00 to 07:59:59 08:00:00 to 08:59:59 09:00:00 to 09:59:59 10:00:00 to 10:59:59 11:00:00 to 11:59:59 12:00:00 to 12:59:59 13:00:00 to 13:59:59 14:00:00 to 14:59:59 15:00:00 to 15:59:59 16:00:00 to 16:59:59 17:00:00 to 17:59:59 18:00:00 to 18:59:59 19:00:00 to 19:59:59 20:00:00 to 20:59:59 21:00:00 to 21:59:59 22:00:00 to 22:59:59 23:00:00 to 23:59:59 53 61 50 29 21 24 34 43 46 62 63 72 72 90 87 94 80 78 70 82 68 70 61 49 1,459 f N °d' ,�cP,1,9° ,�° b°° y°° 6• AcP to"ocP ,,o° ,'c<,bo° b9V/1°° 00° , 9 ,cP ,b INC015 (3.00) Page 1 of 1 Printed 10/19/2004 at 08:35:57 • • Incidents by Time of Day Date Range: From 09/01/2004 To 09/30/2004 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Time of Day Number of Incidents 00:00:00 to 00:59:59 01:00:00 to 01:59:59 02:00:00 to 02:59:59 03:00:00 to 03:59:59 04:00:00 to 04:59:59 05:00:00 to 05:59:59 06:00:00 to 06:59:59 07:00:00 to 07:59:59 08:00:00 to 08:59:59 09:00:00 to 09:59:59 10:00:00 to 10:59:59 11:00:00 to 11:59:59 12:00:00 to 12:59:59 13:00:00 to 13:59:59 14:00:00 to 14:59:59 15:00:00 to 15:59:59 16:00:00 to 16:59:59 17:00:00 to 17:59:59 18:00:00 to 18:59:59 19:00:00 to 19:59:59 20:00:00 to 20:59:59 21:00:00 to 21:59:59 22:00:00 to 22:59:59 23:00:00 to 23:59:59 5 6 4 2 3 3 2 10 5 9 3 6 9 12 10 8 5 14 6 8 8 8 7 7 160 Nom. N INC015 (3.00) Page 1 of 1 Printed 10/19/2004 at 08:36:10 • • Incidents by Day of Week Date Range: From 09/01/2004 To 09/30/2004 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 Day of the Week Number of Incidents Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 25 23 20 23 21 21 27 CJ�yaa1 ceq" Ake - fir° INC014 (3.00) Page 1 of 1 Printed 10/19/2004 at 08:32:34 Incidents by Day of Week Date Range: From 01/01/2004 To 09/30/2004 280 260 240 220 200 180 160 Day of the Week Number of Incidents Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 266 218 172 188 182 206 227 N .\ /. INC0I4 (3.00) Page 1 of 1 Printed 10/19/2004 at 08:30:47 h' Incident Type Count Report Date Range: From 01/01/2004 To 09/30/2004 Selected Station(s): All Incident Type Description Count Station: 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 3 0.21% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 3 50.00% 411 - Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 1 0.07% 463 - Vehicle accident, general cleanup 1 0.07% Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 2 33.33% 742 - Extinguishing system activation 1 0.07% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 1 16.67% Total for Station 6 0.41% Station: 11 100 - Fire, other 1 0.07% 110 - Structure fire, other 2 0.14% 111 - Building fire 8 0.55% 112 - Fires in structures other than in a building 1 0.07% 113 - Cooking fire, confined to container 1 0.07% 142 - Brush, or brush and grass mixture fire 2 0.14% 151 - Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 1 0.07% Total - Fires 16 5.37% 210 - Overpressure rupture from steam, other 1 0.07% Total - Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat - no fire 1 0.34% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 169 11.58% 3210 - EMS Call on the Strand 7 0.48% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 10 0.69% 323 - Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Ped) 2 0.14% 331 - Lock -in (if lock out , use 511) 1 0.07% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 189 63.42% 400 - Hazardous condition, other . 1 0.07% 440 - Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 3 0.21% 444 - Power line down 3 0.21% 460 - Accident, potential accident, other 1 0.07% 463 - Vehicle accident, general cleanup 2 0.14% 482 - Threat to burn 1 0.07% Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 11 3.69% 510 - Person in distress, other 1 0.07% 520 - Water problem, other 1 0.07% 522 - Water or steam leak 1 0.07% 540 - Animal problem, other 1 0.07% 550 - Public service assistance, other 4 0.27% 553 - Public service 7 0.48% 554 - Assist invalid 1 0.07% Total - Service Call 16 5.37% INC065 (3.01) Page 1 of 5 Printed 10/19/2004 08:32:59 • Incident Tvpe Description Count Station; 11 - (Continued) 600 - Good intent call, other 7 0.48% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 33 2.26% 632 - Prescribed fire 1 0.07% 650 - Steam, other gas mistaken for smoke, other 1 0.07% 651 - Smoke scare, odor of smoke 2 0.14% 671 - Hazmat release investigation w/ no hazmat 1 0.07% Total - Good Intent Call 45 15.10% 700 - False alarm or false call, other 5 0.34% 713 - Telephone, malicious false alarm 1 0.07% 730 - System malfunction, other 6 0.41% 733 - Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 3 0.21% 735 - Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 1 0.07% 743 - Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 1 0.07% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 17 5.70% 900 - Special type of incident, other 1 0.07% 911 - Citizen complaint 2 0.14% Total - Special Incident Type 3 1.01% Total for Station 298 20.42% Station: 101 100 - Fire, other 1 0.07% 111 - Building fire 8 0.55% 112 - Fires in structures other than in a building 1 0.07% 113 - Cooking fire, confined to container 3 0.21% 114 - Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue 1 0.07% 118 - Trash or rubbish fire, contained 6 0.41% 131 - Passenger vehicle fire 1 0.07% 142 - Brush, or brush and grass mixture fire 1 0.07% 150 - Outside rubbish fire, other 1 0.07% 151 - Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 2 0.14% 154 - Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire 1 0.07% 161 - Outside storage fire 1 0.07% 162 - Outside equipment fire 1 0.07% Total - Fires 28 2.99% 231 - Chemical reaction rupture of process vessel 1 0.07% Total - Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat - no fire 1 0.11% 300 - Rescue, emergency medical call (EMS) call, other 2 0.14% 311 - Medical assist, assist EMS crew 1 0.07% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 582 39.89% 3210 -EMS Call on the Strand 18 1.23% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 40 2.74% 323 - Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Ped) 10 0.69% 331 - Lock -in (if lock out , use 511) 1 0.07% 353 - Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 1 0.07% 357 - Extrication of victim(s) from machinery 1 0.07% 371 - Electrocution or potential electrocution 1 0.07% 381 - Rescue or EMS standby 1 0.07% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 658 70.37% 40 - Hazardous condition, other 1 0.07% 1NC065 (3.01) Page 2 of 5 Printed 10/19/2004 08:32:59 Incident Type Description Count Station; 101 - (Continued) 400 - Hazardous condition, other 18 1.23% 410 - Flammable gas or liquid condition, other 3 0.21% 411 - Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 1 0.07% 412 - Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 6 0.41% 413 - Oil or other combustible liquid spill 2 0.14% 420 - Toxic condition, other 1 0.07% 422 - Chemical spill or leak 2 0.14% 440 - Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 3 0.21% 444 - Power line down 4 0.27% 445 - Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 8 0.55% 471 - Explosive, bomb removal (for bomb scare, use 721 1 0.07% Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 50 5.35% 500 - Service Call, other 6 0.41% 51 - Person in distress. 1 0.07% 510 - Person in distress, other 4 0.27% 511 - Lock -out 9 0.62% 512 - Ring or jewelry removal 1 0.07% 520 - Water problem, other 9 0.62% 522 - Water or steam leak 23 1.58% 531 - Smoke or odor removal 7 0.48% 541 - Animal problem 5 0.34% 551 - Assist police or other governmental agency 3 0.21% 553 - Public service 3 0.21% 554 - Assist invalid 2 0.14% 561 - Unauthorized burning 3 0.21% Total - Service Call 76 8.13% 600 - Good intent call, other 7 0.48% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 42 2.88% 651 - Smoke scare, odor of smoke 5 0.34% 652 - Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 1 0.07% 653 - Barbecue, tar kettle 3 0.21% 671 - Hazmat release investigation w/ no hazmat 3 0.21% Total - Good Intent Call 61 6.52% 700 - False alarm or false call, other 7 0.48% 714 - Central station, malicious false alarm 1 0.07% 730 - System malfunction, other 5 0.34% 733 - Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 7 0.48% 735 - Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 8 0.55% 740 - Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 4 0.27% 741 - Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 4 0.27% 743 - Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 4 0.27% 744 - Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 1 0.07% 745 - Alarm system sounded, no fire - unintentional 13 0.89% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 54 5.78% 900 - Special type of incident, other 2 0.14% 911 - Citizen complaint 4 0.27% Total - Special Incident Type 6 0.64% UUUT - Test Call - No Incident 1 0.07% 0.11% INC065 (3.01) Page 3 of 5 Printed 10/19/2004 08:32:59 • • Incident Type Description Count Total for Station 935 64.08% Station: 201 11 - Structure Fire 1 0.07% 111 - Building fire 4 0.27% 113 - Cooking fire, confined to container 2 0.14% Total - Fires 7 8.75% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 57 3.91% 3210 - EMS Call on the Strand 1 0.07% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 3 0.21% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 61 76.25% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route Total - Good Intent Call 12 0.82% 12 15.00% Total for Station 80 5.48% Station: 202 • 11 - Structure Fire 1 0.07% 110 - Structure fire, other 1 0.07% 111 - Building fire 2 0.14% 131 - Passenger vehicle fire 2 0.14% Total - Fires 6 8.22% 32 - Emergency medical service (EMS) 1 0.07% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 45 3.08% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 4 0.27% 323 - Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Ped) 1 0.07% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 51 69.86% 600 - Good intent call, other 1 0.07% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 13 0.89% Total - Good Intent Call 14 19.18% 700 - False alarm or false call, other 1 0.07% 742 - Extinguishing system activation 1 0.07% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 2 2.74% Total for Station 73 5.00% Station: 3Q1 142 - Brush, or brush and grass mixture fire 1 0.07% Total - Fires 1 100.00% Total for Station 1 0.07% Station: 601 111 - Building fire 4 0.27% 118 - Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1 0.07% Total - Fires 5 17.86% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 11 0.75% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 1 0.07% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 12 42.86% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 11 0.75% Total - Good Intent Call 11 39.29% Total for Station 28 1.92% INC065 (3.01) Page 4 of 5 Printed 10/19/2004 08:32:59 • • Incident Type Description Count Station: 901 121 - Fire in mobile home used as fixed residence 1 0.07% Total - Fires 1 100.00% Total for Station 1 0.07% Station: UNK 111 - Building fire 2 0.14% 143 - Grass fire 1 0.07% Total - Fires 3 8.11% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 16 1.10% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 3 0.21% 353 - Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 1 0.07% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents. 20 54.05% 511 - Lock -out Total - Service Call 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route Total - Good Intent Call 1 0.07% 1 2.70% 13 0.89% 13 35.14% Total for Station 37 2.54% 1,459 100.00% INC065 (3.01) Page 5 of 5 Printed 10/19/2004 08:32:59 • • Incident Type Count Report Date Range: From 09/01/2004 To 09/30/2004 Selected Station(s): All Incident Type Description Count Station: 11 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 21 13.13% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 1 0.63% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 22 64.71% 444 - Power line down 1 0.63% Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 1 2.94% 554 - Assist invalid 1 0.63% Total - Service Call 1 2.94% 600 - Good intent call, other 1 0.63% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 6 3.75% 671 - Hazmat release investigation w/ no hazmat 1 0.63% Total - Good Intent Call 8 23.53% 700 - False alarm or false call, other 1 0.63% 730 - System malfunction, other 1 0.63% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 2 5.88% Total for Station 34 21.25% Station: 101 118 - Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1 0.63% 151 - Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 1 0.63% Total - Fires 2 2.13% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 62 38.75% 3210 - EMS Call on the Strand 2 1.25% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 3 1.88% 323 - Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Ped) 1 0.63% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 68 72.34% 400 - Hazardous condition, other 2 1.25% 413 - Oil or other combustible liquid spill 1 0.63% 444 - Power line down 1 0.63% 445 - Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 4 2.50% Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 8 8.51% 500 - Service Call, other 1 0.63% 511 - Lock -out 2 1.25% 522 - Water or steam leak 2 1.25% Total - Service Call 5 5.32% 600 - Good intent call, other 1 0.63% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 4 2.50% Total - Good Intent Call 5 5.32% 733 - Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 1 0.63% 735 - Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 2 1.25% 741 - Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 1 0.63% 1NC065 (3.01) Page 1 of 2 Printed 10/19/2004 08:33:15 • Incident Type Description Count Station; 101 - (Continued) 745 - Alarm system sounded, no fire - unintentional 2 1.25% Total - Fats Alarm & False Call 6 6.38% Total for Station 94 58.75% Station: 201 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 12 7.50% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 2 1.25% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 14 87.50% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 2 1.25% Total - Good Intent Call 2 12.50% Total for Station 16 10.00% Station: 2Q2 11 - Structure Fire 1 0.63% 131 - Passenger vehicle fire 1 0.63% Total - Fires 2 22.22% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 5 3.13% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 5 55.56% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 2 1.25% Total - Good Intent Call 2 22.22% Total for Station 9 5.63% Station: 6Q1 111 - Building fire 2 1.25% 118 - Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1 0.63% Total - Fires t 3 75.00% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 0.63% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 1 25.00% Total for Station 4 2.50% Station: 9Q1 121 - Fire in mobile home used as fixed residence 1 0.63% Total - Fires 1 100.00% Total for Station 1 0.63% Station: UNK 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 0.63% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 1 50.00% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 1 0.63% Total - Good Intent Call 1 50.00% Total for Station 2 1.25% 160 100.00% 1NC065 (3.01) Page 2 of 2 Printed 10/19/2004 08:33:15 • • HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALEND R YEAR 2004 3 ... FIRE STATISTICS_ ..` THIS MO. THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION LAST F/Y TO DATE RES. 41 '�' 31 ORIGINAL INSPECTION 1111 2 I 2. % 1 L37� 5 (o Z COMMERCIAL / ' '7 ! x-/- 4:7-a ,34I ASSEMBLY %`� 0 �� TOTALS CO o INSTITUTIONS �Y 5 $ Z554 1 & C l utt_sA INDUSTRIAL 0 O 2— I APARTMENTS i 2 0 (0 S RE -INSPECTION COMMERCIAL 2..'& �'�i f � y ASSEMBLY .. 0 INSTITUTIONS 0 D INDUSTRIAL 0 D i APARTMENTS 3 OCCUPANCY LOAD C 2 CITATIONS ISSUED V Q . AMBULANCE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2Q4/ 05 INV BILL FOR EMS THIS MO. THIS MO. LAST F/Y F/Y TO - DATE LAST F/Y TO DATE THIS MO. F/Y TO DATE LAST F/Y TO DATE RES. 41 '�' 31 111 1111 2 I 2. % 1 L37� 5 (o Z NON -RES. 2 1 1 46032.14026 TOTALS CO o 541611 5 $ Z554 1 & C l utt_sA Respectfully Submitted: RUSSELL TINGLEY, FIRE CHIEF Noted: STEVE BURRELL, CITY MANAGER • • October 19, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 26, 2004 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT September 2004 STATISTICS CURRENT THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY MONTH LAST YEAR DATE TO DATE Workers Comp Claims Claims opened 1 1 5 1 Claims closed 0 2 10 5 Total open 53 50 Current Employee 34 35 Lost time (hours) Safety Fire 0 60 .240 377.50 972 Police 60 Non -Safety 0 0 0 0 Liability Claims Claims opened 1 1 18 4 Claims closed 11 1 15 6 Total open 31 28 Employee -Involved Vehicle Accidents Safety 0 0 0 0 Non -safety 0 0 0 0 Employee Turnover Safety Non -Safety 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 Respectfully submitted, Noted: Michael A. Earl, Director Stephen R. Burrell City Manager Personnel & Risk Management Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 18, 2004 Regular Meeting of October 26, 2004 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT — SEPTEMBER 2004 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City. Manager; this includes engineering and management of Capital Improvements Projects. NON-CIP PROJECTS PLAN CHECK FOR CONST. ENVIRON. PLAN REVIEW SEWER LATERAL SEWER DEMO. STREET EXCAV. BANNERS DUMPSTER/ MISC. UTIL. CO. CUTS ENCR./C.U.P. ETC. CURRENT MONTH 13 2 1 7 8 2 24 16 2 YEAR TO DATE 28 16 11 10 21 16 72 42 4 NON-CIP PROJECTS STAFF HOURS DESCRIPTION CURRENT PREVIOUS YEAR TO MONTH DATE Field Investigations 41 38 93 Inspections 130 134 385 NPDES Permit/City Storm Water Management Program 17 29 56 General Office Engineering 83 42 191 Grant Applications 4 2 10 Projects 14 22 52 Meetings - Other Public Agencies 10 10 30 NPDES Investigations 13 5 20 TOTAL HOURS .312 282 525 SERVICE REQUESTS RECEIVED CURRENT MONTH COUNTS* COMPLETED YTD DESCRIPTION RECEIVED YTD Building Maintenance 61 191 154 Medians 0 3 1 Parks 27 100 74 Sewers 5 14 11 Storm Drains 5 10 6 Street Lighting 7 57 35 Street Maintenance 49 113 87 Traffic Safety 41 113 80 Vehicle Maintenance 20 91 91 Other 26 98 62 Call -Outs (Services provided after hours and/or on weekends) ** 3 14 14 TOTALS 244 804 615 76% completed ENGINEERING •The Capital Improvement Proiects currently in progress or completed are: COMPLETED PROJECT NO. TITLE 04-05 BUDGET AMOUNT TOTAL COMPLETED UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 04 - 114 00 - 630 TITLE Speed Humps Pier Renovation, Phase III TOTAL UNDER CONSTRUCTION 04-05 BUDGET AMOUNT 12,500 -, 4,109,360- 4,121,860 ,109,3604,121,860 OUT TO BID PROJECT NO. TITLE 04-05 BUDGET AMOUNT TOTAL OUT TO BID UNDER DESIGN PROJECT NO. 99 - 409* 03 - 418** 02 - 106 02 - 108 04 - 115 00 - 140 99 - 610 02 - 626 TITLE Manhole Repair/Reconstruction Pump Station Upgrades ON HOLD Beach Drive Undergrounding/Street Improvements 2nd Street Resurfacing Street Imp. — 20th St., Valley Dr. to Power St. 11th St. On Street Parking Improvements — ON HOLD Fire Station Upstairs Remodel & Additions Community Center ADA Upgrades, Phases 3 & 4 TOTAL TO BE DESIGNED 04-05 BUDGET AMOUNT 244,315 452,776 105,442 464,740 149,500 190,898 80,550 148,222 1,686,943 TO BE DESIGNED PROJECT NO. 04 - 112 04 - 113 04 - 116 04 - 117 00 - 412 04 - 534 02 - 612 02 - 634 TITLE Slurry/Crack Sealing at Various Locations Concrete Road Reconstruction at Various Locations Street Imp. — Pier Ave., Hermosa Ave. to PCH Manhattan Ave. Street Improvements Sewer Improvements* Park Improvements Public Works Yard Renovation Exterior Painting of City Buildings TOTAL TO BE DESIGNED 04-05 BUDGET AMOUNT 100,000 100,000 120,000 35,000 76,290 25,000 79,858 14,500 700,148 *03-04 Budget — Projects to be completed 04-05 **Includes amount to be reappropriated 2 • MAINTENANCE The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: • Building Maintenance • Equipment Service • Parks/Medians • Sewers/Storm Drains • Street Lighting • Street Maintenance/Traffic Safety Building Maintenance: Installed electrical in new modules in Police Department, removed graffiti from beach restrooms; repaired restroom fixtures at City Hall; installed new fountain in City Hall; started project Kiwanis project in Room 1 and Room 2 at the Community Center; repaired fixtures in the Police Department; replaced old scoreboard at the Community Center; ongoing Council Chamber setting up. Equipment Service Division: Replaced defective utility boxes; started crawler repairs; stated smog checks; replaced drive shaft on Chevrolet; continued entering inventory and other info into new program; ongoing vehicle repairs. Parks/Medians Division: Repaired irrigation in Valley Park and the Greenbelt; repaired the main line in Clark Field; re -landscaped the Fire Dept. planters; repaired City volleyball poles on the beach; set up soccer fields for the season; removed a palm tree from the Community Center lawn. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Inspected pump stations; started design for pump stations; coordinated sewer clean out citywide. Street Lighting Division: Installed 5" conduit for temporary lifeguard station as part of Pier project; did USA survey; repaired City streetlights on 35th St.; rebuilt timers for flashing lights on the Strand; build communication trailer for Pier project. Street Maintenance/Traffic Safety Division: Rebuild showers and fountain at the Pier Head; removed graffiti; repaired bollard at the Pier project; pothole repairs citywide; repaired sidewalks; repainted school crosswalks; started new crosswalk project; installed lids for recyclable items to bring into recycling program. FY 04-05 MONTH Graffiti Removal: HOURS FY 03-04 MONTH HOURS JULY 31.5 JULY 30.0 AUGUST 38.0 AUGUST 29.5 SEPTEMBER 19.0 SEPTEMBER 39.5 OCTOBER OCTOBER 23.0 NOVEMBER NOVEMBER 28.0 DECEMBER DECEMBER 24.5 JANUARY JANUARY 17.0 FEBRUARY FEBRUARY 6.5 MARCH MARCH 28.0 APRIL APRIL 11.5 MAY MAY 167.5 JUNE JUNE 51.0 TOTALS 88.5 456.0 3 • Respectfully submitted: Rhea B. Punneo Administrative Assistant Noted: Stephen R. B rrel City Manager Concur: • Rich., . D. Morgan, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer H:\B95\PWFILES\Activity Reports\Activity Report 04-05 September.doc 4 �,y� t� 1 ll�lli ►-..i� . hl ilt wig 1.\1 Vti! 'r 111�rP' Ti1Ti, i III Ilk I 1:111111- larIIIMINN,MIIIIMII,IMM■ i(rj!ijA1II �11,a\�11'(i1'.�:c1►: viii -■ VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST 34TH STREET PROJECT: VARIANCE APPLICATION OWNER: LaSalle Bank, N.A., Trust No. 01-3475 401 B Street, Suite 9990 San Diego, CA 92101 T 619.744.2720 F 619.238.8146 ARCHITECT: Day, Genik 1558 10th Street Santa Monica, CA 90401 Contact: Kevin Day 310.656.3180 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Gilsanz Murray Steficek 523 West 6th Street, Suite 810 Los Angeles, CA 90014 Contact: Anders Carlson 213.943.4850 CML ENGINEER: Sukow Engineering 7101 Baird Ave. Suite 204 Reseda, CA 91335 Contact: Mel Sukow 818.654.0675 LANDSCAPE DESIGN: Landscapes 2027 Talmadge Street Los Angeles, CA 90027 Contact: Kathleen Ferguson 323.666.1665 SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APRROVAL IN CONCEPT 5/11/04 VARIANCE APP. 0721/04 SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE CONTRACTOR: Winters -Schram Associates 1660 Euclid Street Santa Monica, CA 90404 Contact: Jim Schram 310.396.0555 Daly Genik 1558 10th St Sults C Santa Monica, CA 90401-2806 34TH STREET PROJECT T: 310.656.3160 111 34TH ST. F. 310.856.3183 HERMOSA BEACH, CA E. info@dalygenlk.com 92054 3410 HERMOSA AVE. HERMOSA BEACH. CA 92054 Tink COVER SHEET RUDE 072164 "A0.00 i ELECTRICAL DRAWING INDEX MECHANICAL DRAWING INDEX 0 I SHEET DRAWING TIRE SHEET DRAWING FIRE g SIGNAGE/GRAPHICS DRAWING INDEX S SHEET DRAWING TRE PLUMBING DRAWING INDEX 4 SHEET DRAWING TIME S s I STRUCTURAL DRAWING INDEX ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING INDEX continued ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING INDEX GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS SHEET DRAWING TRE APPROVAL IN CONCEPT 091104 S SHEET DRAWING TTRE 1 SHEET DRAWING TITLE S S b I S MEET DRAWING TTIE S PS9 S j S S A1.01 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PIAN (ROOF PIAN) • • A0.01 *0.02 SHEET ILEX PROJECT INFORMATION • • • • A0.03 GENERAL AGES • • A201 GARAGE PLAN • • *202 TERRACE PLAN • • A2D GUEST ROOM RAN • • A2.0N CONNECTION PLAN AND SECTION • • AIDS ROOF PLAN • • LONGI URINAL SECTION • • A3.12 TRANSVERSE SECTION • • A.T.21 SOUTH ELEVATION • • A3.22 NORTH ELEVATION • • /0323 WEST ELEVATION • • A320 EAST ELEVATION • • DEMOLITION DRAWING INDEX SHEET DRAWING TIRE S A 3 I g CML DRAWING INDEX a 0 SHEET DRAWING TITLE ARDAHRECTUSAL SURVEY • • Col CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN • • CNR BURDEN; XSECTIQE • • LANDSCAPE DRAWING INDEX SHEET DRAWING TITLE A S I S 3 Lat LANDSCAPE RAN • • SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APRROVAL IN CONCEP15/11)04 SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE VARIANCE APP. 07/21/04 Daly Genik 1558 109, St Suite C Sante Monica, CA 90401-2806 T: 310.656.3180 F: 310.656.3183 E inlo©Gelypenik.com 34TH STREET PROJECT 111 34TH ST. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 3410 HERMOSA AVE. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 IDOL SHEET INDEX 15 012104 E`' A0.01 III ISI III III III .IJ. PROJECT DATA iii8 a I i A ILa15 .5 Lot B, Bock 101, ShNmspean Trac e ; 9 ! N 1 1 1 ! m a 5 ; 2 1. k 3 Q [qi RIF € Mi PROJECT NAME: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: .. g g .. .. Es mgzt co Cu w%* $222222§ Ere iia & g t°h � 3 gg LL Es F N vi PROJECT TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE BY FLOOR uNg O 0 OUTDOOR SPACE O LEGENDS & SYMBOLS ABBREVIATIONS M ti II m4.1 HIM ai h »d 5LL000 tipdq ad 3��3g3333�3 MATERIALS KEY 1 II= II= II Illi •11- ii is 11 'i - 7 II y b i I 3iiiii i lii _ i 111111 iii11JJH1JJfli; d • 0 g hhh4zu dZa bzizaOdd8J ;0 $(.4 , 0 A dgddM0rrhd a I I 11 11 Ni Ih r7 g El9 o�iJ! !!!" a 41SSaY1almNNNNY)N FHFI- 1-�1-�F-1pp-1-1-1- a ci uLd LAM t pg > maI-Ir Ydddddddu Yimw1 wcou)4 N NNmNNNNNNa)mNNNN aI aINNbN HF F dd dcf d 0 =mi5y9m2ta;mdaichw 13h1111 hh 1 1 W1 111111111 11 cS >t Y pptt ziti�cf �d 0 d • dtgehggal ci ddddd aiddp4x cifJgJ�y p gn oIatig oS�ZdJQ pihpkp J dJ ggghxyx ,12E iYgAJ�doop�pd& aicj9uYiigi dp lhqF= �+ d1�2aI {CaO.aV�Uihe_ i`��`mmmmmm �UUU�UUUUVBUUUUUU III IIIWWW�WWWWWW� LLLL�LLIL IL IL LL4 JLLIiLLLLLLLL�LL �U(7 U'UUmUU =S�SSZ2S2�'-=ZZ�` a SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE 34TH STREET PROJECT U qs t12 ;Cm a A a DATE Daly Genik TE GENERAL NOTES 1 5.M 1-2SSC C 34TH STREET PROJECT °TmAT.. 80401-2806 - T: 310.656.3180 111 34TH ST. 3410 A AVE. IIRR. An o o - F. 310.656.3103 HERMOBA BEACH, CA HERMOSA OSA BEACH, CA E info(Bdalypenik.corn 92054 92054 1 111 111III�`; 11111_ llUhgg al _ 3F. � � � r it 41101 i! 1Ii I '1k 11 X511 7' o�R_ 1 II ;1�Iaf7 ill:ill 74 q 11, 1 0 ill III 17 ill !I 111r 'Iaan a qalit �� =a11 iri0 7 z cr t t > 5s fi21ET! 11 6 I [IIZI! fa II 1 1 III jtI! s id Rif � I I a PLANTED IIEDWI HERMOSA AVENUE ASPHALT PAWN? PRININIV 1 0 MU! I:1 411 •4 IIIIIIOmC CONTROL A9 POINT X91 drFj lT I FD LAT I N0 TAG 110010 WALKWAY STONES 36"r 18 (TTP) rp 816 10422 1/4.24 106.23 L /1524 TW 10566 lG 11725 R (/424 lF 11623 /W 17823 11207 NEW STAINLESS S/EEL FENCE 15' MGR 10110 R 76576 (111.48) FS X/ POST (111.50) FS / DOWNSPOUT HOSE 818 10018 Rl 2'N" $000 HEADER EX. PLANTER (99.95) TC (99.45) FL 999 FRAME R 06.10 EXISTING FOUR STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 3410 HERMOSA AVE. SCALE: 1" = 4' EX. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 109.50 FS 111.75 FS EX. CONCRETE GARAGE 117.00 TW (111.88) FS JOIN (100.04) TC (99.54) FL SET L8T LS 3447 97" 0/S 988/ TG 1Nk I COVE 10011AV _ 100.50 99J/ 98. 5_ 100.0 100.28 TWPA 87'7F TCB $71NV. O 104.50 TD 100.50 INV 109.00 FG 109.00 FG HP 109.00 TS 108.60 TG 104.60 INV. 117.00 TW (112.00) FS SET d4 LS ' 47 712CD (111.84) FL (111.91)FS f 109.00 FG 109.00 FG 110.507W 110.50 TW 109.00 FG 117.Od TW (111.85) FL 117.00 1W (11191)FS 100.14TC I • 10024 FS PA 104.50 TC 162 00 TC 110.50 FS 104.50 TW 104.50 BW 107.00 TW / (105.33)13W 112.007W / (108.45) BW 13.75 TW (110.34) BW 115.507W / (112.03)8W EX. CONCRETE WALK EX CONCRETE WALK 1�1•'' �Oi �%�I�ddd lel 1�1�1�1�1�1�en lililililhIn i1hi1hi1iMAYAY (105.20 TC 104.70) FL (100.21) FL EX- CONC. GUI/ER (108.35 TC r (107.05 FL ( 0.23) TC (109.61) FL 7/7.24 EC 712.01 f(C (11122) 115.5d TW (112.5r) TC &1GF- I Rah CHAIR I (112.47)TC RAMP I / (112.45).3S I It 1T "Mfn aDAATEIDDENTIFIER (112.20) Fl. 05/09/04 METERED PARKING METERED PARKING I METERED PARKING FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTES SEE SHT. C-02 34TH ST. SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE 34TH ST. DATE Daly Genik PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: MEL VIN SUKOW R.C.E.22673 SUKOW ENGINEERING 7101 BAIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4204, RESEDA , CALIFORNIA 91335 (818) 654-0675 FAX: (818) 708-9616 LAND PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING 155/31011 St 5uile C Sante Monica, CA 90401-2806 T: 310.858.3180 F: 310.858.3183 E: .Ro6d,909, c.cam CONCRETE PAVING 34TH ST. PROJECT 111 34TH ST. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 MEM MOMMEMII WM WI MN IrAd MI MI 111.11111110 1 1 O WM IWO =_ ■M��t�', ■_�j _ .,,. Ia=NE1iN!- ���s.■ -- MIMI!0LE-- •.1111 M� JW 1111��I� wIIIIILo nos 1111rI -� 1111—AMN� I!RT..�L NI=IN MENDIP 11NC11•1 =■EM' ! 1111C!!11111MMIM=■111111I� NNI111111111H��■� — •IWWI= ITWORNWWII NM RI III! MAN MAN MI mi.1.2.-.,IMENNIMMINIM NItaMi'IIIIIiiIMME■EM■■RIII1MMILIM F11�'1 ummou.. sImum II ■■miIIINI\NM. �� MI ��111I1, ■I �IIINI�h III =111E1IIIIII■�� Al III=111111� UI=1111101ikIl■��� •11(11FMEM� u■■s111'l_ - -- X - SECTION DETAIL MI___I___■■■s3■� ____I•••••�-■■■� ■■ommum1 MIMI MN111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIk1■■■■� MBE =1=IMINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIki■■■■� 1 ' �M i M I 1. I I IMI UMM 111111111111111111111WINEN I MIN �I WREN 1I __MEM .IR■_II min — � !RI MI■■IIIPI—MII �III,, •• I \WIII MINI—WMm--=NMI !IRA =MMEN -M--- MIME -- 11-_� �M� m, LEMINIIIIIMIIIII iIlimell11e:mfriiii me =Num ----- -- mi■7mum imam�■I>• \AIWA— M. MN= —=Rims Km" --Nw.—u INEM iRlrr MIMIIAN WWI DM NM l_lr _. •.►.!. — —, IMIBM \—IMEINIMINOWN ��I►��I=eisminmr!.�ilr�NARWI=— MMIRIWAIMUJIMI=E= MEWED IRM — — IR IOWN, AAII!lriPW --L _L►w err_ migiwrio MP' GUN FOOTING BEYOND IYa,-f,al& Sola nd ,7,171 I=111=11. m.wm IT I=1 r 1= 00.50 D"p&15 1 s; 15 4 rpt. IiI=III=III= - r..r 41,1-1 c. I 1-1 11= 7, �'i• A-470 a.p:.ara to um ax. o 771 -111=11 -41 hfge rar ET S •Yekw1 iq q YP. •. e�'aaai°a al '6 4 •• I' I e►▪ T • WRTEMIP" a t',„,..°7 oa�GdaN:Nbd. ./t7 \•0 a• t,,,, Eolbm et,. 1I11 111111111111=11111111 III le 0:* DRY WELL DRAIN • i 0 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CONSTRUCT 3"X 9" RECTANGULAR C.I. PIPE CURB DRAIN. 9 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE DRY WELL PER DETAIL 10 SAW CUT AND JOIN 11 PROP. CONC. STEPS AND SLABS SEE ARCHITECT PLAN 12 PROP. RET.WALL SEE ARCHITECT PLAN CONSTRUCT 6" PCC CURB & GUTTER (a=1.5') PER STD. PLAN CONSTRUCT 6" PCC DRIVEWAY PER STD. PLAN CONSTRUCT 4" PCC WALK OVER COMPACTD SUBGRADE CONSTRUCT 4" AC OVER 6" CMB CONSTRUCT 4" PVC PIPE (SDR 35) CONSTRUCT 6" PVC PIPE (SDR 35) CONSTRUCT CONCRETE (9110) CATCH BASIN PER DETAIL N.T.S X -SECTION DETAIL N. T.S — 5- — -5-- - - 5-- 0 ORD LEGEND: = EXISTING SEWER LINE = EXISTING WATER LINE = EXISTING GAS LINE = FLOWLINE = STORM DRIAN PIPE = RIDGE LINE = AREA DRAIN = ROOF DRAIN = CATCH BASIN O I = PROP. AC PAVING = PROP. PCC (WALK, STEPS,& SLAB) = PROP. PCC DRIVEWAY = CONSTRUCTION NOTE = 1"x 6" SLOT (UNDERGROUND UTILITIES: THE EXISTING LOCATIONS OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES OR STRUCTURES HAVE NOT BEEN SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY LINES AND ANY OTHER LINES NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY DIGALERT AT (800) 422-4133, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY ON-SITE WORK. DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST IWO DAYS BEFORE YOU OIC UUER01110 8URD AUDI Q A11OOI COM SET SPECIRC ISSUE DATE APRROVAL N CONCEP75/11/04 VARIANCE APP. 0721/04 SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE Daly Genik 1558 10th St Sults C Santa Monica, CA 90401-2806 T: 310.658.31E10 F: 310.656.3103 E: A4o@dalypenIk.eom EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: CUT FILL 80.0 CY 00.0 CY *QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE FOR PLAN CHECK PURPOSES AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR BID PURPOSES CONTRACTOR SHOULD RUN THEIR OWN QUANTITIES AND BID A COMPLETE JOB. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 0.06 ACRE MAP DAcTEIDEoTIFIER 105/09/04 BY: JN I R x nta oa4T l 05/09/04 34TH STREET PROJECT 111 34TH ST. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 3410 HERMOSA AVE. HERMOSA BEACH. CA 92054 unk BUILDING X-SECT1ONS WOG 071211.04 NW CORNER OF PROPERTY sr,v1t.r ‘40 @ 0 0 0 0 eir,4 ® ® M ritar 11 0 0 ® ® ® 0 ® ILIIii16..... DE) PLANT 01111111111111 fr amosilig00013.0.011:011110:0111.010-0-0.40.1:r I 41301011000041000000010M ,,„,„04:44.001000.400.00. reirgireCarlf.P.""ji. f A00411000000000000.0,01400_00 SW CORNER OF PROPERTY J714443,4, HiCES EWE 0?i3M LM ALL PLANTING WIThIN SETBACK NOT TO EXCEED 42" SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLAN scale: 1/1.=P-0' NE CORNER OF PROPERTY ALLEY ELEV.. +111_9 • • •• • ••• • •• • •• .••• • • •• • ESITChla •Assneas.., Roser son }O • SE CORNER OF PROPERTY Kathleen Ferguson LANDSCAPES 2021 Talmadge Street Los Angeles, CA 90021 323 666 1665 > tel 323 417 4739 > fax flearthlink.net > ail Only the individuals contracted to ante or prodoce this damned are resFasible for its contents. All drayings and written material herein constitute anginal and unpablished material and la not be ..licated yithout the P* i1• HARRIS 3410 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 RE KE 5.23,04 Nett! . SCHEMAT C DESIGN 1 m 0 CO 3'-0" SIDE SETBACK 5'-0"j REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK WITH LOT TIE FD L&T NW CORNER OF P 100.10 F- (N) PLANTING AREA TURNWG RADIUS 0 TURNING RADIUS 2r - 5-0' REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK WITH LOT TIE 4 O x (E) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 0 ACTUAL SETBACK 7-10• PER ARGHTECIURN. SURVEY TERRACE 132.14 LINE OF GARAGE DOOR BELOW 1 132.22 133.43 134.70 EXPANSION JOINT SLOPE VARIES 130.1E 130.2E ZINC COATED STAINLESS STEEL ROOF V 132.14 130.1E FOR GROUND LEVEL ELEVATIONS SEE A2.02 TERRACE PLAN SW CORNER OF PROPERTY' 21'-0 I/2' FD L&T 100.58 6'-1 1/2• (0) SIDEWALK (E) METERED PARKING 10'-0' FROM SE1EACI( 34 TH STREET 01 SITE PLAN 114. -1'f/ 17-0' 06R106 DOOR sumac (N) STREET TREES (E) METERED PARKING (N) PLANTING AREA (E) METERED PARKING N (N) PLANTING AREA 3.-o• TEAR SETBACK • SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APPROVAL IN CONCEPTS/11p4 VARIANCE APP. 07/21104 SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE Daly Genik 11259 SE CORNER Sed' aiasC ° 34TH STREET PROJECT 90401-2808 T: 310.858.3180 F: 310.858.3183 E: Inio®dely9en lk. cOm 111 34TH ST. HERMOSA BEACH. CA 92054 3410 HERMOSA AVE. HERMOSA BEACH. CA 92054 U (E) ROLLING GATE (E) FENCE (N) 6'0" FENCE TAP. (N) CONCRETE RETAINING WALL BELOW FENCE PROPERTY Tmt SITE PLAN ism o 2.0 A1.01 5,- (E) 3'-0" SIDE SETBACK FD L&T +100.10' 85'-0 SET LAT LS .3447 111.48 SETB (E) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE //////////////////////////////////// /////////////////7///��������42 TURNING RADIUS 44'-2" (E) ROOF DRAIN 102.10 ..r /" Y I I PLANTED AREA I I IM I it q",V1-,• -k"--.%tit-%9 iigiV:il .Zatkt14:1.61i0K70,,11%??: . D0:05 TG L__VAFAP or 40 MININIINIo. yew! s w 1 e• ALL OF REFLECTING POOL EARTH TURMNG RADIUS 27'-2' CONC. FLOOR r ROLL UP GARAGE DOOR REQUIRED SIDE K WITH LOT TIE EDGE OF TERRACE ABO 4 POOL AND SPA WALL PLANTED AREA 102.10 CONC. RETAINING WALL PLANTED AREA (N) CONC. RETAINING WALL i 34 TH STREET CONC. GUTTER (E) BRICK PAVING (N) STREET TREE METERED PARKING 8'-1 1/2' (E) SIDEWALK 01 GARAGE PLAN yr-ra 22'-10 1/2' 34TH ST. SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APRROVAL IN CONCEPTS/11p4 VARIANCE PPP. 07/21/04 SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE Daly Genik 1558 1081 St Soho C S.I.I. Monica, CA 90401-2808 T: 310.658.3180 F. 310.658.3183 E: info@dalygonIk.com RENT iSERUM i NE CORNER >F PROPERTY 112.59 SE CORNER OF EDGE OF RETAINING WALL FOOTING ABOVE (TVP.) PROPERTY U mI a (31 tiAIiAGE PLAN HERMOSA BE 34TH STREET PROJECT Inn OM, /04 9Q[1: 3410 OSA BE AVE. A2.01 ACH, CA 92054 111 34TH ST. HERMOSA BEACH. CA 92054 i (E) 3'-O" SIDE SETBACK FD L&T S:T L&T 1.S 3447 171.48 100.10 5'-O" REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK WITH LOT TIE (E) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 109.60 EDGE OF CONC. REE J ( (N)) TREE ALLEY ql NE CORNER OF —(E) FENCE N) WD. GATE �-{N) 6'O' FENCE TYP. I� CONC. STEPS LINE OF CONC. RETAINING WALL 100.05 TC WATER WALL CONC. COUNTER/BALUSTRADE VARIES EDGE OF GUEST ROOM ABOVE CONC. STEPS EDGE OF CONC. 109.10 109.60 110.10 1110.39 5-0" REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK WITH LOT TIE PLANTED AREA PLANTED AREA PLANTED AREA 109.1 (N) WD. GATE PLANTING AR-E—A—"--10 1$I�k!DN 109.1 (N) WD. FENCE —�� PLANTING AREA SW CORNER OF PROPERTY rC ALL LANDSCAPE WALLS LESS THAN 42- ABOVE GRADE SET L&T LS 3447 11201 CONC. STEPS WO. SLAT FLOOR 1 SHOWER PROPERTY CONC. PAVING CONC. PAVER TYP. (N) WD. GATE PROPERTY CONC. GUTTER HERMOSA AVE. (E) BRICK CONC. CURB PAVING TYP. (N) STREET TREE METERED PARKING METERED PARKING (E) PARKWAY (N) STREET TREE METERED PARKING LINE OF (E) SIDEWALK TYP. (N) STREET TREE 10'-0' FRONT SEI91CI( 34 TH STREET 17-0' GIRD DOOR SE19AC6 T CONC. PAVING 22'-2 of TERRACE LEVEL PLAN C. 17/ SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APPROVAL N CONCEPTS/1104 VARIANCE APP. 072104 SHEET SPEOFIC ISSUE DATE -,0- SET t Daly Genik S 1 G 34TH STREET PROJECT 90401-2806 T: 310.856.3180 F: 310.656.3183 E: In1O®tleypenik.corn 111 34TH ST. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 3410 HERMOSA AVE. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 WHEEL CHAIR RAMP a 0I nu& TERRACE PLAN MITE 0'/21,04 ' A2.02 1 (E) 3'-O" SIDE SETBACK 5'-O" REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK WITH LOT TIE 5'-O" REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK WITH LOT TIE (E) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 3 UP 121.43 CABINETS CLOSET GLASS LINE OF GLASS ABOVE GUEST ROOM 650 SF POOL BELOW O//000/Dm/%/gym// t0 3 Z D7 GUEST ROOM PLAN „r=het 34 TH STREET 1D'-0. FRONT SETBACK 14'-8' SET SPECIRC ISSUE DATE APRROVAL IN CONCEPTS/11/04 VARIANCE APP. 0721/04 SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE Daly Genik 1558 101h St. Suite C Santa Monica, CA 90401-2806 T: 310.656.3160 F: 310.656.3183 E: Into@datygenkAcm r -o• REAR SETBACK MIL GUEST ROOM PLAN 34TH STREET PROJECT ME =KEET: A2.03 111 34Th ST. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 3410 HERMOSA AVE. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 i LANDING INSIDE (E) HOUSE ELEVATION = +127.18' LANDING 0 T.O. BRIDGE STAIR ELEVATION - +126.02' BEDROOM F.F. ELEVATION = +121.43• LMNG ROOM F.F. ELEVATION = +120.68' T.O. BALUSTRADE ELEVATION = +114.10' SE CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION = +112.59' NE CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION = +111.48' TERRACE ELEVATION = +110'.60• REAR YARD F.G. ELEVATION = +109.1D' OCONNECTION SECTION IR-1'xr 71 WO BALUSTRADE STAIR 3 GUEST ROOM BEYOND CAST—IN—PLACE CONC. r rET ''a �i- ..r+` .r•r.4= 3z+u't.L e �....'`; :. } . �� ..::�,'f. r, �...._ T, ,t �, ?,.3,: '•5 *o iia '�. .. a3 94, 127.02 (E) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (N) STEP 127.18 127.78 07 CONNECTION PLAN p• -r-0 GUEST ROOM 650 SF SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APPROVAL IN CONCEPTS/11/04 SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE VARIANCE APP. 0721,04 Daly Genik 1558 1091 SL Sidle C Serve Monica, CA 90401-2806 T: 310.658.3180 F: 310.850.3183 E: Into®ealyyenik.00m 34TH STREET PROJECT 111 34TH ST. HERMOSA BEACH. CA 92054 3410 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH. CA 92054 11ne CONNECTION PLAN AND SECTION ISM 095104 '1""A2.04 (E) 3'-0" SIDE SETBACK 5-0" REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK WITH LOT TIE r ,• ••• .• .•• ,•• ,• . . 5'-0 REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK WITH LOT 11E HERMOSA AVE. 1 34 TH STREET ®ROOF PLAN .14 (E) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 00 133.43 EXPANSION JOINT IC's,132.14 132.22 SLOPE VARIES 130.18 130.28 ZINC COATED STAINLESS STEEL ROOF 132.14 1 130.18 L SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APRROVAL IN CONCEP75/11,04 VARIANCE APP. 07121,04 SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE Daly Genik 1558 10875t Suite C Santa Monica, CA 90401-2806 IE REAR SETBACK 34TH STREET PROJECT T: 310.656.3180 111 34TH ST. F: 3100503183 HERMOSA BEACH, CA E: ntoeclalygenlk.corn 92054 3410 HERMOSA AVE. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 Tink ROOF U'A2.05 M 078,04 daLANDING INSIDE (E) HOUSE ELEVATION - +127.18' ALANDING C T.O. BRIDGE STAIR ELEVATION = +126.02' BEDROOM F.F. ELEVATION = +121.43' LIVING ROOM F.F. ELEVATION = +120.68' AT.D. BALUSTRADE ELEVATION = +114.10' ASE CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION = +112.59' 66 NE CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION = +111.48' TERRACE ELEVATION = +110'.60' cik REAR YARD F.G. ELEVATION - +109.10' ASW CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION -+100.56' AAVERAGE FOR BUILDING ENVELOPE ELEVATION = +100.33' 4 NW CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION =+100.10' (E) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 1'-0• BACK SETBACK ABD+E FIRST FLOOR MAX BUILDABLE yiN�V�iY+E.� ENVELOPE ZINC COATED STAINLESS STEEL ROOF CONC. SLAB STAIR 1 CONC. COUNTER BARBECUE INSIDE COUNTER PLANTER CONC. BENCH PLANTING BEYOND NEW CONCRETE. DRIVE GARAGE 10'-0• FRONT SETBACK 01 LONGITUDINAL SECTION 114"-1'-0 17•-0" WAGE DOOR SE713K7C \\ \\ CONC. FOUNDATION COLUMN FOOTING BEYOND SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APRROVAL IN CONCEPTS/11,04 SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE VARIANCE APP. 0721,04 3'-0• RENO SETBACK Daly Genik 1558 10111 St. Suite C Sante Monica, CA 90401-2806 T: 310.656.3180 F: 310.656.3183 E: i to@dalygenik.com (N) WD. GATE (N) WD. 6•-D" FENCE (N) STEPS TO REAR YARD (N) CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 34TH STREET PROJECT 111 34TH ST. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 3410 HERMOSA AVE. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 TrILL LONGITUDINAL SECTION IROS O7R1p4 `A3.11 i diLANDING INSIDE (E) HOUSE ELEVATION = +127.18' di LANDING 0 T.O. BRIDGE STAIR ELEVATION = +126.02' SW CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION =+100.56' NW CORNER OF PROPERTY (01 TRANSVERSE SECTION 114' 1'4J ELEVATION =+100.10' (E) SDE SETBACK (E) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZINC COATED STAINLESS STEEL CONC. COLUMN W/ STAIR INSIDE WD. FENCE BEYOND TYP. BEDROOM F.F. $ ELEVATION = +121.43' T.O. BALUSTRADE AL ELEVATION = +114.10' (E) SIDEWALK TERRACE ELEVATION = +110'.60' 5-0' REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK WITH LOT nE CONC. FOUNDATION 5'-0T REQUIRED SDE SETBACK WITH LOT 11E SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APPROVAL IN CONCEPT5/11434 SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE VARIANCE APP. 07/21/04 Daly Genik 1558 10th St Suite C Santa Monica, CA 90401-2806 34TH STREET PROJECT T: 310.656.3180 111 34T1 -I ST. 3410 HERMOSA AVE. F: 310.656.3183 HERMOSA BEACH, CA HERMOSA BEACH, CA E: into@dalygenik.com 92054 92054 MIL TRANSVERSE SECTION ism 07/21 /OS 'REE`:A3.12 LANDING INSIDE (E) HOUSE ELEVATION = +127.18' LANDING C T.O. BRIDGE STAIR ELEVATION = +126.02' BEDROOM F.F. ELEVATION = +121.43' LIVING ROOM F.F. ELEVATION = +120.68' T.O. BALUSTRADE ELEVATION = +114.10' SE CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION = +112.59' NE CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION = +111.48' 66 TERRACE F.F V ELEVATION = +110'.60' 66 REAR YARD F.G. ELEVATION = +109.10' SW CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION =+100.56' AVERAGE FOR BUILDABLE ELEVATION =+100.33 44, NW CORNER OF PROPERTY TY ELEVATION =+100.10' r (E) SINGLE—FAMILY RESIDENCE BEYOND BRIDGE CONNECTION — — — � `O HOUSE BEYOND it REAR SETBACK ABOVE 1ST FLOOR tJVELOOE — MAX BUIL DABLE E. ZINC COATED STAINLESS' STEEL PANELS (N) WOOD FENCE BEYOND 5' -0 - SETBACK `8! 0 z 0 m C 0 0 w 0 m �IIIIYIV� PLANTER CAST—IN—PLACE CONCRETE WD. BALUSTRADE CONC. RETAINING WALL i IP�;''m1:►;iti , I ;i ',lila il�lilulllil��IIl kIlll',I'IA 1111 TO' —Tr FROM SMACK D1 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/r. TO CONC. PLANTER I'I ` I INE OF GARAGE BEYOND UNE OF DRIVE BEYOND CONC. PLANTER LINE OF (E) SIDEWALK GRADE SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APRROVAL IN CONCEPTS/11AM VARIANCE APP. 0721,04 SLEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE s-cr REAR SETBACK AT 1ST FIBOR Daly Genik 1558 10th St. Suite C Sento Monica, CA 90401-2806 T. 310.858.3180 F: 310.656.3183 E. MfoWdeyylenec.000, i SE CORNER OF PROPERTY }, ELEVATION = +112.59' AVERAGE FOR BUILDABLE ENVELOPE ELEVATION = +112.02' NE CORNER OF PROPERTY h ELEVATION = +111.48' 34TH STREET PROJECT 111 34TH ST. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 3410 HERMOSA AVE. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 1m SOUTH ELEVATION ISSUE 07/21,1 PIMA3.21 dik LANDING INSIDE (E) HOUSE .� ELEVATION = +127.18' di LANDING C T.O. BRIDGE STAIR ELEVATION = +126.02' BEDROOM F.F. ELEVATION = +121.43' LIVING ROOM F.F. ELEVATION = +120.68' SE CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION = +112.59' AVERAGE FOR BUILDABLE ENVELOPE ELEVATION = +112.02' NE CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION = +111.48' dik REAR YARD F.G. ELEVATION = +109.10' MAX BUILDABLE ENVELOPE 1'-0' RENT SETBACK ABOVE 1ST FLOOR L1 WD. FENCE MAX BUILDABLE ENVELOPE CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE akSW CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION =+100.56' diNW CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION =+100.10' ZINC COATED STAINLESS o. NORTH ELEVATION WATER WALL FLOOR LINE BEYOND WD. BALUSTRADE 111 ll • LINE OF GARAGE BEYOND ___/11 LINE O DRIVE BEYOND CONC. BALUSTRADE MAX BUILDABLE ENVELOPE CONC. PLANTER BEYONDI 10'-0' FRONT YARD SETBACK SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APPROVAL IN CONCEPT5/11A04 VARIANCE APP. 07/21/09 SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE Daly Genik 1558 1 Oth St Suite C Santa Monica, CA 90401-2606 T.O. BALUSTRADE ELEVATION = +114.10' TERRACE F.F. ELEVATION = +110'.60' SW CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION =+100.56' AVERAGE FOR BUILDABLE ENVELOPE AL ELEVATION =+100.331-1FRA1ncA AVFr NW CORNER OF PROPERTY 06„ ELEVATION =+100.10' "IF 34TH STREET PROJECT T. 310.656.3180 111 34TH ST. 3410 HERMOSA AVE. F: 310.656.3183 HERMOSA BEACH, CA HERMOSA BEACH. CA E: intOWdelygenk.corn 92054 92054 Tn12 NORTH ELEVATION IRIE: 0721A14 s'A3.22 QD WEST ELEVATION yr-ra i (5) GALVANIZED STEEL SIDING (5) CEMENT BOARD ddik LANDING INSIDE (E) HOUSE ELEVATION = +127.18' 06, ADDITION LANDING O T.O. STAIR 11 ELEVATION = +126.02' NW CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION =+100.10' I I I I I I I I (E) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION (N) EXPANSION JOINT (N) GLAZING (N) CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE (N) ZINC COATED STAINLESS STEEL LOT 5 LOT 8 PROPOSED LOT TIE 5'-0' REWIRED SDE SETBACK WINK LOT 11E 1 SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APRROVAL IN CONCEPT5/11/04 VARIANCE APP. 0721/04 SHEET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE ADDITION BEDROOM F.F. ELEVATION = +121.43' (N) WD FENCE BEHIND (N) CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE (N) CONCRETE PLANTER ADDITION T.O. BALUSTRADE AL ELEVATION = +114.10' 5-4r REQUIRED SOE SIDE SMACK WOR LOT TIE 34TH STREET Daly Genik 1Sante Monica5561°x' B7., ButtCAe ° 34TH STREET PROJECT 90401-2806 T: 310.656.3180 F: 310.656.3183 E in10@deyge k.corn 111 34TH ST. HERMOSA BEACH. CA 92054 3410 HERMOSA AVE. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 ADDITION TERRACE F.F. ELEVATION = +110'.60' SW CORNER OF PROPERTY 461, ELEVATION = +100.56' TOIL WEST ELEVATION 6SHE 0721KM A3.23 LANDING INSIDE (E) HOUSE ELEVATION = +127.18' ADDITION LANDING ® T.0. STAIR ELEVATION = +126.02' ADDITION BEDROOM F.F. ELEVATION = +121.43' (N) CONC. COLUMN AND FLOOR SLAB N) WD. FENCE (N) CONC. PLANTER 9X� cik SE CORNER OF PROPERTY IV ELEVATION = +112.59' 34TH STREET PROPOSED ADDRION (E) SINGLE—FAMILY RESIDENCE (E) GALVANIZED STEEL SIDING (E) CEMENT BOARD (N) EXPANSION JOINT (N) ZINC COATED STAINLESS STEEL \ (N) GLAZING REOUIFD SIDE SETBI CK YIITH IDT TE LOT 6 1 LOT 5 (E) WD. FENCE PROPOSED LOT TIE DD EAST ELEVATION t14 =1'.0 1 SET SPECIFIC ISSUE DATE APRROVAL IN CONCEPTS/11/04 VARIANCE APP. 07/21/04 SHEET SPECWC ISSUE DATE Daly Genik (E) SETBACK 5'-0' REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK WITH 1E NE CORNER OF PROPERTY ELEVATION = +111.48 155610th 51.5uIteG 34TH STREET PROJECT Sante Monica, CA 90401-2806 T: 310.656.3180 F: 310.656.31133 E Into@delygenik.corn 111 34TH 5T. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 3410 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054 TIDE EAST ELEVATION ISSUE 07rzlpa A3.24 z 0- ° czi U w _ce U — NM N MN --= N-- 11111_ IN N In M TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS 200 PIER AVENUE PROJECT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Schaar Homes 800 Manhattan Beach Boulevard, No. 204 Manhattan Beach, California 90266 Prepared by: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 234 East Colorado Boulevard, Suite 400 Pasadena, California 91101 Phone: 626.796.2322 Fax: 626.792.0941 Email: pasadena@llgengineers.com Prepared under the Supervision of: k M. Greenspan, P.E. cipal September 13, 2004 1-043487-1 vAtiCSIVID Std, S 2.5A COM DEQ DEpi. LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Section TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary iv 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Project Description 3 2.1 Existing Project Site 3 2.2 Proposed Project Description 4 3.0 Site Access and Circulation 7 3.1 Existing Site Access 7 3.2 Proposed Project Site Access 8 4.0 Project Parking 10 4.1 Office Condominium Use 10 4.2 General Office Use 11 5.0 Existing Street System 13 6.0 Local Public Transit Services 17 6.1 MTA Metro Bus Transit Service 17 6.2 LADOT DASH Bus Transit Service 17 7.0 Traffic Counts 19 8.0 Project Traffic Generation 23 8.1 Project Trip Generation Forecast 23 9.0 Project Trip Distribution 25 10.0 Cumulative Development Projects 29 10.1 Ambient Traffic Growth Factor 29 11.0 Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology 35 11.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds 35 11.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios 37 12.0 Traffic Analysis 39 12.1 Existing Conditions 39 12.2 Existing With Ambient Growth Conditions 39 12.3 Future Pre -Project Conditions 39 12.4 Future With Project Conditions 44 13.0 Congestion Management Program Traffic Impact Assessment 47 13.1 Intersections 47 13.2 Freeways 48 14.0 Conclusions 49 O: 'JOBFIL E\3487ireport13487-To1C2. wpd 200 Pier Avenue Project i City of Los Angeles, California LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Figure TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 1 Vicinity Map 2 2A Level 1 Site Plan 5 2B Level 2 Site Plan 6 3 Existing Lane Configurations 14 4 Existing Public Transit Routes 18 5 Existing Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Commuter Hour 21 6 Existing Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Commuter Hour 22 7 Project Trip Distribution 26 8 Project Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Commuter Hour 27 9 Project Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Commuter Hour 28 10 Location of Related Projects 31 11 Related Projects Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Commuter Hour 33 12 Related Projects Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Commuter Hour 34 13 Existing With Ambient Growth Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Commuter Hour 40 14 Existing With Ambient Growth Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Commuter Hour 41 15 Future Pre -Project (Existing, Ambient Growth, and Related Projects) Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Commuter Hour 42 16 Future Pre -Project (Existing, Ambient Growth, and Related Projects) Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Commuter Hour 43 17 Future With Project (Existing, Ambient Growth, Related Projects and Project) Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Commuter Hour 45 18 Future With Project (Existing, Ambient Growth, Related Projects and Project) Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Commuter Hour 46 O: UOB_FILEt3487 ✓eport k3487-To/C2. wpd 200 Pier Avenue Project li City of Los Angeles, California LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Table Page 1 Existing Traffic Volumes 20 2 Project Trip Generation Summary 24 3 List of Related Projects 30 4 Related Projects Trip Generation 32 5 Intersection Impact Threshold Criteria 36 6 Level of Service Summary 38 Appendices A Manual Traffic Counts B ICU and Levels of Service Explanation Project ICU and HCM Data Worksheets: C HCM and Levels of Service Explanation Project ICU and HCM Data Worksheets: AM and PM Peak Commuter Hours AM and PM Peak Commuter Hours O:'JOB_FIL E134871report\3487- TofC2. wpd 200 Pier Avenue Project 111 City of Los Angeles, California LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEER S TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS 200 PIER AVENUE PROJECT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This traffic and parking analysis has been conducted to identify and evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed 200 Pier Avenue project. The proposed project is situated in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. The project site is located at 200 Pier Avenue in the Downtown area of Hermosa Beach. The proposed 200 Pier Avenue project site is generally bounded by Pier Avenue to the north, existing residential housing development to the south, Bayview Drive to the east, and Manhattan Avenue to the west. The proposed 200 Pier Avenue project will contain approximately 18,500 square feet of floor area in three building levels, with the ground floor level facing Manhattan Avenue. A total of 54 for -sale units will be provided within the office condominium building. It is anticipated that the proposed project will be built and occupied by the year 2006. The proposed project is expected to generate a net increase of six vehicle trips (five inbound trips and one outbound trip) during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, the proposed project is expected to generate a net increase of six vehicle trips (one inbound trip and five outbound trips). Over a 24-hour period, the proposed project is forecast to generate a net increase of 40 daily trip ends during a typical weekday (20 inbound trips and 20 outbound trips). O:4UO8FILF_ 13487 reportt3487-Rp1wpd iv Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW & GR[ENSPAN ENGINEERS The traffic analysis follows the City of Hermosa Beach traffic study guidelines and is consistent with traffic impact assessment guidelines set forth in the 2002 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County. This traffic analysis evaluates potential project -related impacts at four study intersections in the vicinity of the proposed project site. The study intersections were determined in consultation with City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department staff. The Intersection Capacity Utilization and Highway Capacity Manual methods were used to determine Volume -to -Capacity ratios and Levels of Service for the study intersections. Based on City of Hermosa Beach threshold criteria, it is concluded that no significant traffic impacts will occur at the study intersections following the construction and occupancy of the proposed project. Incremental, but not significant impacts are forecast at the study intersections during the morning and afternoon peak commuter hours. It is concluded that as a total of 56 on-site parking spaces is planned to be provided as part of the proposed project, the parking supply meets the Coastal Zone requirement of 56 parking spaces for general office use. As an office condominium use, a requirement for 54 parking spaces is forecast for the proposed project. In addition, based on the removal of the existing site driveway on Pier Avenue, it is anticipated that the City of Hermosa Beach will be able to provide additional on -street angle meter parking spaces (approximately four spaces) on the south side of Pier Avenue adjacent to the project site. O:`JOB FILE1.34871reportt3487-Rpt2.wpd v Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS 200 PIER AVENUE PROJECT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 1.0 INTRODUCTION This traffic analysis has been conducted to identify and evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed 200 Pier Avenue project. The proposed project is situated in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. The project site is located at 200 Pier Avenue in the Downtown area of Hermosa Beach. The proposed 200 Pier Avenue project site is generally bounded by Pier Avenue to the north, existing residential housing development to the south, Bayview Drive to the east, and Manhattan Avenue to the west. The proposed project site and general vicinity are shown in Figure 1. The traffic analysis follows the City of Hermosa Beach traffic study guidelines and is consistent with traffic impact assessment guidelines set forth in the 2004 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County. This traffic analysis evaluates potential project -related impacts at four study intersections in the vicinity of the proposed project site. The study intersections were determined in consultation with City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department staff. The Intersection Capacity Utilization and Highway Capacity Manual methods were used to determine Volume -to -Capacity ratios and Levels of Service for the study intersections. In addition, a review was conducted of Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority intersection and freeway monitoring stations to determine if a Congestion Management Program transportation impact assessment analysis is required for the proposed 200 Pier Avenue project. This study I) presents existing traffic volumes, ii) forecasts future traffic volumes with the related projects, iii) forecasts future traffic volumes with the proposed 200 Pier Avenue project, iv) determines proposed project -related impacts, and v) identifies mitigation measures, where necessary. O. UOB_FIL E13487,report 13487-Rpt2. wpd 1 Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project City of Hermosa Beach, California — 111111 MN Al N an 1 N /I EN M 1 11111 N M M NM N o:\job_file\3487\dwg\fl.dwg LOP 13:58:23 09/13/2004 rodriquez 133r08d 3f1N3AV ZI3Id OOZ n z -n GRetA, , '----, • 1{ _ t .1,,i r.f-ri 'e, ..` ,r �da�> . -'.-.;I: 4" - ittlittlill°1410C11111,-.10114!1.101111.15111111PCiwv41111.-0100. c=' tip 110 -� 1• „�� Hy ^� ,gyp 4-r✓nom.. a X11 ,' , �4 1' fa It . . o . , . i1L1. is 0,Pte' * �'1, W tj ► .4,- - :ism K 1• Q :•.1 .nr' +70 4ytr p+ �• `.` ; ,• �, `b . 1 tr 1.,„ •111 R;T~ it `' ` 0! N' k. ,3, 1 ' . PLI:, 03 n Q0 NA.._gxl � ,4 ° 1r .ilii C .Hrf. _ \ ;,."•'R"4 pP16 3 (G1. iso 1� 0.\� e�� d+ 1 ` s3i '— ?I'. �Q� f ,' �� r ��0;1 1 ,t`.3., R� �%'•A �-+ KUHN J VD7.4 F. 2.. o VA .�� d y 44\ N w "-�. C �D J� AY Sk�/ ,��� �, `. �+ ` m 1 2 �'`i 3b� �A1�d n� _ .,ei(lQ o �13� S_ 1S 11tH • • ),53� +d rfti l f 1_ v � n � S I,, ALM kY-� �Av �� =jx o, MEA ,,� e1©y Q�� .clR� 49 O 3s iTlj yt ' 1 d> CMZ' \CO . p� it « E,00 g_ %v dam/ J',. ,� _... •+ ...�,'O F• 'EEQ Sf Avk m C g : a `+ t WI ;' o0$t DSXON ST 8 m •1p s - Aar. /.� ani .+° „ " r> r Yj _ Iv • t�'� iir •r. r. � ' HERRIN ST ' �"-_ LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Schaar Homes seeks to obtain entitlements to construct an office condominium project in the Downtown area of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. The project site is located at 200 Pier Avenue in the Downtown area of Hermosa Beach. The proposed 200 Pier Avenue project site is generally bounded by Pier Avenue to the north, existing residential housing development to the south, Bayview Drive to the east, and Manhattan Avenue to the west. 2.1 Existing Project Site The existing project site is currently occupied by a three-story, for -rent office building with surface parking areas provided along the Manhattan Avenue and Bayview Drive property frontages. The existing building includes 42 rental units within approximately 12,500 square feet of building floor area. This building will be removed in order to accommodate the proposed 200 Pier Avenue office condominium project. Access to the existing site is provided via one driveway on Pier Avenue and one driveway on Manhattan Avenue, as well as via Bayview Drive. Circulation within the existing project site (i.e., between the Manhattan Avenue and Pier Avenue driveway) is currently one-way with the Manhattan Avenue driveway one-way inbound and the Pier Avenue driveway one-way outbound. A total of 45 parking spaces is currently provided on the site, including one handicap accessible space. Of this total, 21 parking spaces are provided on the west side of the building and 24 parking spaces are provided on the east side of the building adjacent to Bayview Drive. The parking spaces provided along the east side of the existing building extend perpendicular from Bayview Drive and are directly accessed from the roadway. O:'JOB FILE134871repoR13487-Rpt2wpd 3 Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 2.2 Proposed Project Description The proposed project consists of the development of an office condominium building at 200 Pier Avenue in the Downtown area of the City of Hermosa Beach. The proposed 200 Pier Avenue project will contain approximately 18,500 square feet of floor area in three building levels, with the ground floor level facing Manhattan Avenue. A total of 54 for -sale units will be provided within the office condominium building. It is anticipated that the proposed project will be built and occupied by the year 2006. The 200 Pier Avenue level one (i.e., Manhattan Drive level) and level two (i.e., Bayview Drive level) site plans are illustrated in Figures 2A and 2B, respectively. Access to the proposed project site is planned to be provided via one driveway on Manhattan Avenue and one driveway on Bayview Drive. These driveways will provide access to and from the internal site driveway aisles and project parking spaces. A total of 56 parking spaces is planned to be provided as part of the proposed 200 Pier Avenue project. Further discussions of the site access and project parking are provided in following sections of this report. O:`JOB FILE13487repor`.3487.Rpt2.wpd 4 Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project City of Hermosa Beach, California I S r S— —— 1 s all MI S S— e M r N— o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f2a.dwg LDP 13:56:39 09/13/2004 rodriquez 114.2 at ,415*.5M :sol Wrp i �K�4 leorc to.11,7.4.f poll.; C.0041XC'KY CK+'04 yeta ..n I,0 '. -'y IYOO!te0: MANHATTAN AVENUE so-son..j.* LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGIINEERS SOURCE: GROWDON + CLINE ARCHITECTS, INC. NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 2A LEVEL 1 SITE PLAN 200 PIER AVENUE PROJECT 1 SIM fill ilia NS Mill MEI SIB 11111 OM NM MIN Mill SIN MN SIMI NIB CfN cr 0 a a v.) a N 4 0 .0 -o N co 0 7 0 ff) 47. LINSCOTT LAW esi GREENSPAN ENGONEERS SOURCE: GROWDON + CLINE ARCHITECTS, INC. NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 2B LEVEL 2 SITE PLAN 200 PIER AVENUE PROJECT LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 3.0 SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION The site access and internal circulation scheme for the proposed 200 Pier Avenue project is presented in Figure 2A and 2B. Vehicular access to the project site will be provided via two site driveways: one driveway on Manhattan Avenue and one driveway on Bayview Drive. Brief descriptions of the existing and proposed project site driveways are provided in the following subsections. 3.1 Existing Site Access Access to the existing site is provided via one driveway on Pier Avenue and one driveway on Manhattan Avenue, as well as via Bayview Drive. Brief descriptions of the existing project site driveways are provided in the following paragraphs. Existing Site: Manhattan Avenue Driveway This driveway is located on the east side of Manhattan Avenue at the southwest corner of the project site, south of Pier Avenue. The existing Manhattan Avenue driveway presently accommodates only left -turn and right -turn ingress vehicle turning movements, as the driveway is designated and signed for one-way inbound only access. Internal vehicular circulation on this portion of the existing project site (i.e., between Manhattan Avenue and Pier Avenue) is currently one-way with the Manhattan Avenue driveway one-way inbound and the Pier Avenue driveway one-way outbound. This driveway provides access to 21 parking spaces currently provided on the west side of the existing building. Existing Site: Pier Avenue Driveway This driveway is located on the south side of Pier Avenue at the northwest corner of the project site, east of Manhattan Avenue. The existing Pier Avenue driveway presently accommodates only right -turn egress vehicle turning movements, as the driveway is designated and signed for one-way outbound only access. Further, this driveway is limited to right -turn only egress vehicle turning movements based on the lane geometrics of Pier Avenue adjacent to the driveway. This driveway accommodates egress from the 21 parking spaces currently provided on the west side of the existing building. O:'..;OR....Fi1..F13487‘report 3487-Rpt2.wpd 7 Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Existing Site: Bayview Drive Access Vehicular access to and from the 24 parking spaces currently located on the east side of the existing building is provided directly via Bayview Drive. Bayview Drive borders the project site to the east, and the parking spaces provided along the east side of the existing building extend perpendicular from Bayview Drive. The parking spaces are directly accessed from the roadway. 3.2 Proposed Project Site Access The site access and internal circulation scheme for the proposed 200 Pier Avenue project is presented in Figure 2A and 2B. Vehicular access to the project site will be provided via two site driveways: one driveway on Manhattan Avenue and one driveway on Bayview Drive. The existing site driveway on Pier Avenue will be removed as part of the proposed project. It is anticipated that this will allow the City of Hermosa Beach to provide additional on -street angle meter parking spaces (approximately four spaces) on the south side of Pier Avenue adjacent to the project site. Brief descriptions of the proposed project site driveways are provided in the following paragraphs. Proposed Site: Manhattan Avenue Driveway This driveway will be located on the east side of Manhattan Avenue at the southwest corner of the project site, south of Pier Avenue. The proposed Manhattan Avenue driveway will be located at the same location as the existing site driveway on Manhattan Avenue. The proposed Manhattan Avenue driveway is planned to accommodate both left -turn and right - turn ingress and egress vehicle turning movements. This driveway will accommodate access to and from the parking spaces to be provided in parking area level one. The proposed Manhattan Avenue driveway will be constructed to City of Hermosa Beach standards. 0:! IDB_._ FILF13487reportt3487-Rp12wpd 8 Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Proposed Site: Bayview Drive Driveway This driveway will be located on the west side of Bayview Drive, south of Pier Avenue. The proposed Bayview Drive driveway will accommodate left -turn and right -turn ingress vehicle turning movements and, due to the angle of the driveway, left -turn egress vehicle turning movements only. This driveway will accommodate access to and from the parking spaces to be provided in parking area level two. The proposed Bayview Drive driveway will be constructed to City of Hermosa Beach standards. O:UOB_FILE134871reporf 3487-Rp12wpd 9 Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 4.0 PROJECT PARKING The resource typically utilized by the City of Hermosa to determine parking requirements for development projects is Chapter 17.44, Off -Street Parking, of the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Zoning Code. However, in this instance, the Zoning Code does not provide parking rates for a land use comparable to the proposed office condominium project. Therefore, based on conversations with City of Hermosa Beach Community Development staff, it was determined that it would be appropriate to develop a parking rate applicable for the proposed 200 Pier Avenue project. 4.1 Office Condominium Use As previously discussed, the proposed project consists of an office condominium type land use with a total of 54 for -sale units. Based on discussions with the project development team, the target market for buyers will be local residents who operate businesses within the Hermosa Beach area and/or work out of their homes. It is anticipated that the office condominium units will be marketed to non-medical professional/business tenants (sole proprietors) who are receptive to the benefits that owning versus leasing office space provides. Additionally, it is expected that the local resident business professional will welcome the opportunity to buy property in the Downtown Hermosa Beach area without the expense of purchasing land, while benefitting from significant tax advantages, building equity, property appreciation, etc., as well as being in a prime location. In order to develop a parking rate applicable for the proposed 200 Pier Avenue project, a profile was formulated for the office tenants and expected travel modes based on the proposed land use and anticipated unit ownership characteristics. The following assumptions have been assumed to provide a conservative forecast of the parking required for the proposed project: Buyers typically will be local resident non-medical professional/business tenants (sole proprietors) 90 percent peak occupancy (i.e., not all office occupants will be present at the same time) Few visitors, if any, are expected on-site 15 percent of occupants will utilize alternative modes of travel such as walking, bicycling, ridesharing, and transit O ?JOB._FIL E134871report 13487 -Rpt 2. wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 10 City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Based on the assumptions set forth above, the peak parking demand is forecast to be 54 spaces. The parking demand calculation is as follows: • Tenant Spaces 54 [Units] x 0.90 [Occupancy] = 48.6 x 0.85 [15% Alt. Travel Mode] = • Visitor Spaces Plus visitor spaces at 1.0 visitor space per 5 units; 54 [Units] ± 5 = • Total Demand 42 Spaces 11 Spaces 53 Spaces Office Condominium Parking Rate Parking Ratio = 53 [Total Spaces] - 54 [Units] = 1.0 Spaces/Unit (rounded on a per unit basis) Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed office condominium parking demand is one (1.0) parking space per office unit (approximately 343 square feet on average). As a total of 56 on-site parking spaces is planned to be provided as part of the proposed 200 Pier Avenue project, the parking supply is anticipated to meet forecast demand. As part of the total parking supply, the project will also provide a minimum of two handicap accessible spaces, one of which will be a van accessible space. This complies with current American with Disabilities Act requirements of a minimum of two handicap accessible spaces for parking facilities with 51 to 75 spaces, with one in every eight handicap spaces being van accessible. 4.2 General Office Use In as much as there is always the future potential that the proposed office condominium project could be converted to general office use, the project parking requirement has been determined based on the Coastal Zone requirement of three (3.0) spaces per 1,000 square feet. On this basis, a total of 56 parking spaces are required as shown below: • (18,500 SF ± 1,000 SF) = 18.5 x 3.0 SP/1,000 SF = 56 Spaces O: IJOB__FIL F13487ireport 13487 -Rpt?. wpd 11 Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS With a proposed total of 56 on-site parking spaces, the project parking supply meets the parking requirement for general office use. It should also be noted that as a result of the proposed project, the existing site driveway on Pier Avenue will be removed as part of the proposed project. This will allow the City of Hermosa Beach to increase the supply of parking available to the public by approximately four on -street angle meter parking spaces on the south side of Pier Avenue. o:\\,toB F1LE\3487\ eJ o r 487.Rpt2. vpd 12 Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW & GEENSPAN ENGINEERS 5.0 EXISTING STREET SYSTEM Immediate access to the 200 Pier Avenue project site is provided via Pier Avenue to the north, Bayview Drive to the east, and Manhattan Avenue to the west. Among the key roadways that provide access to the 200 Pier Avenue study area are the following: • North-South Roadways: ► Hermosa Avenue ► Manhattan Avenue ► Monterey Boulevard East-West Roadway: ► Pier Avenue The following four study intersections were selected for analysis of potential impacts due to the proposed project: 1. Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue. 2. Manhattan Avenue/Pier Avenue. 3. Bayview Drive/Pier Avenue. 4. Monterey Boulevard/Pier Avenue. Three of the four study intersections selected for analysis are controlled by stop signs. Study intersection number 1, Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue, is currently traffic signal controlled. The existing lane configurations at the four study intersections are displayed in Figure 3. A brief description of the important roadways in the project vicinity is provided in the following paragraphs. C:'./OR3., f I1.F`,3487'•.report;3487-Rpt2.14pd 13 Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project City of Hermosa Beach, California o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f3.dwg LDP 13:59:23 09/13/2004 rodriquez OSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OU UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 3 EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS 200 PIER AVENUE PROJECT 14 LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Hermosa Avenue is a north -south oriented roadway that is located west of the project site. Hermosa Avenue provides primary north -south circulation through the Downtown Hermosa Beach area. Two through travel lanes are provided in each direction on the roadway within the project study area. The Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue intersection is currently traffic signal controlled, with separate left - turn phasing provided for the southbound left -turn movement. Three hour metered parking on Hermosa Avenue is generally allowed on both sides of the roadway and in force seven days a week from 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM. Hermosa Avenue is posted for a 25 miles per hour speed limit near the project site. Manhattan Avenue is a north -south oriented roadway that borders theprojectsite to the west. Manhattan Avenue provides local north -south traffic access in the vicinity of the project site. One through travel lane is provided in each direction on the roadway within the project study area. The Manhattan Avenue/Pier Avenue intersection is currently stop sign controlled, with the stop signs facing the Manhattan Avenue approaches. Through north -south vehicle travel movements on Manhattan Avenue at Pier Avenue are precluded based on the design and configuration of the intersection. South of Pier Avenue, one hour parking from 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM is generally allowed along both sides of Manhattan Avenue near the project site. Between Pier Avenue and 14`h Street, three hour metered parking on Manhattan Avenue is generally allowed on both sides of the roadway and in force seven days a week from 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM. North of 14th Street, one hour parking from 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM is generally allowed along both sides of Manhattan Avenue. Manhattan Avenue is posted for a 25 miles per hour speed limit near the project site. Bayview Drive is a north -south oriented roadway that borders the project site to the east. Bayview Drive, which is essentially an alley way, provides local north -south traffic access to properties in the vicinity of the project site. One through travel lane is provided in each direction on the roadway within the project study area. The Bayview Drive/Pier Avenue intersection is currently stop sign controlled, with the stop signs facing the Bayview Drive approaches. Parking is prohibited along both sides of Bayview Drive near the project site as the roadway provides direct access to parking garages and spaces. Speed limit signs are not posted on Bayview Drive in the project vicinity, thus it is assumed to be a prima-facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour, as stated in the State of California Vehicle Code. O: iJOB_FILEi3487veporit3487-Rpt 2. wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 15 City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW GRFFNSPAN ENGINEERS Monterey Boulevard a north -south oriented roadway that is located east of the project site. Monterey Boulevard provides local north -south traffic access in the vicinity of the project site. One through travel lane is provided in each direction on the roadway within the project study area. The Monterey Boulevard/Pier Avenue intersection is currently all -way stop sign controlled. One hour parking from 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM is generally allowed along both sides of Monterey Boulevard in the project study area. Monterey Boulevard is posted for a 25 miles per hour speed limit near the project site. Pier Avenue is an east -west oriented roadway that borders the project site to the north. Pier Avenue provides primary east -west circulation through the Downtown Hermosa Beach area, extending between Hermosa Avenue to the west to Pacific Coast Highway to the east. Two through travel lanes are provided in each direction on the roadway within the project study area. Three hour metered parking on Pier Avenue is generally allowed on both sides of the roadway and in force seven days a week from 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM. Pier Avenue is posted for a 25 miles per hour speed limit near the project site. O:JOB_FILE048Treport 3487-Rpt2.wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 16 City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 6.0 LOCAL PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICES Local public transit service in the vicinity of the project is currently provided by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) and Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT). The existing public transit routes in the 200 Pier Avenue project site vicinity are illustrated in Figure 4. A summary of the existing transit routes, including the route, destinations, and the peak hour headways is presented in the following subsections. 6.1 MTA Metro Bus Transit Service MTA provides bus transit service along Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue within the traffic analysis study area. MTA Route 130 operates along Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, and provides service between Redondo Beach and Cerritos. MTA Route 130 provides headways of 1 to 2 buses during the morning and afternoon peak commuter hours. MTA Route 439 operates along Hermosa Avenue, and provides service between Redondo Beach and the Patsaouras Transit Plaza in Los Angeles. MTA Route 439 provides headways of 2 buses during the morning and afternoon peak commuter hours. 6.2 LADOT DASH Bus Transit Service LADOT provides bus transit service within the study area with its DASH shuttle bus service. Commuter Express Route 438 operates along Hermosa Avenue, and provides service between Redondo Beach and Downtown Los Angeles. Commuter Express Route 436 provides headways of 3 to 4 buses during the morning and afternoon peak commuter hours. OrJOB FILE134871report13487-Rp12.wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 17 City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN_ o:\job_file\3487\dwg\t4.dwg LDP 13:59:51 09/13/2004 rodriquez Dockweiter State Beach 1412124 MX3 riGRAND CE574 125 EL SEGUNDO EL EL SEGUNDO 125 434 CEO/ Manhattan State Beach ROSECRANS 439 CE431 124 125 6261 124 C1438 SKI co 124 442 BROADWAY HA M EL 1 SEOUNDO 232 EL SEGUNDO DOUGLAS MARINE M M 135TH 18 CE574 125 MX3X 0 ROSECRANS Ia 2 1u HAW ORNI 48 135TH 340 442 s 211 a. 125 4, F REDONDO BEACH MANHATTAN BEACH 6113 126 126 14143MANRATTAN BEACH BL v s g 232 ARTESIA El 215 LWRES 4X31 \ 124 6A1 LWEX 6A1 DALE LW1fS MANHATTA 215 1412 131 NNW 40 340 442 LWRES 439 131 \W38 1�1 H MOSA BEACH v esI 439 oto 215 44 GRANT South• , at GALLERIA AT SOUTH TAY 14X2 32 1TOTH DEL ANO 215 & T2 14x2 REDONDO BEACH 1 232 130 211 124 6A3 131 21 6 TORRANCE B Redonda Slate Beach W T6 732 12i T4 4Cr T7 T6 ARTESIA IL 444 1$ T1 T2 T3 9elAmo a` Euhiain Cenfa, 11X33 100TH TORRA T6 to O 39 NAPLI 444 EPULbEDA TB T4 T9 P412 T4 T1 MAP SOURCE: METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ENGINEERS NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 4 EXISTING PUBLIC TRANSIT ROUTES 200 PIER AVENUE PROJECT 18 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 7.0 TRAFFIC COUNTS Manual counts of vehicular turning movements were conducted at each of the four study intersections during the weekday morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) commuter periods to determine the peak hour traffic volumes. The manual counts were conducted by a traffic count subconsultant, City Traffic Counters, at the four study intersections from 7:00 to 9:00 AM to determine the AM peak commuter hour, and from 4:00 to 6:00 PM to determine the PM peak commuter hour. Traffic volumes at the four study intersections show the morning and after peak periods typically associated with peak commuter hours in the metropolitan area. The existing weekday AM and PM peak commuter period manual counts of turning vehicles at the four study intersections are summarized in Table 1. The existing traffic volumes at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak commuter hours are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. Summary data worksheets of the manual traffic counts of the study intersections are contained in Appendix A. O:1JOB_.FIL Ei34871report 13487-Rpt2. wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 19 City of Hermosa Beach, California t 1 LINSCOTT LAVV& GREENSPAN F: N (, I N C E R S Table 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES [1] 200 Pier Avenue Project 13 -Sea -2004 NO. INTERSECTION DATE DIR AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR BEGAN VOLUME BEGAN VOLUME 1 Hermosa Avenue/ 07/22/04 NB 8:00 619 5:00 582 Pier Avenue SB 430 754 EB 0 0 WB 377 367 2 Manhattan Avenue/ 07/22/04 NB 8:00 119 5:00 194 Pier Avenue SB 61 66 EB 422 473 WB 322 410 3 Bayview Drive/ 07/22/04 NB 8:00 16 5:00 6 Pier Avenue SB 6 2 EB 363 447 WB 396 419 4 Monterey Boulevard/ 07/22/04 NB 8:00 138 5:00 171 Pier Avenue SB 100 114 EB 403 512 WB 496 614 [1] Counts conducted by City Traffic Counters 20 ON —— I w ON NM N NM— I N NM ON MN EN i N— N o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f5.dwg LDP 14:00:13 09/13/2004 rodriquez T z C3 z Mni H C')1— Fi Zi Z0 D Z Z >0 '0 1l O �m >c<m cm I -r G) m X C C gEMM INS all all a= Oa M M M— V 1 N an a— all N N N o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f6.dwg LDP 14:00:47 09/13/2004 rodriquez z z Y1 1 7e iO3PO2Id 3f1N3AV 2f3Id OM m X Z -0 -v� om 0 < m G, c c O cm m LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 8.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION Traffic volumes expected to be generated by the proposed project during the AM and PM peak hours, and over a 24-hour daily period were estimated using trip generation rates provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation publication, 6`h Edition, 1997. ITE Land Use Code 710 (General Office Building) trip generation average rates for number of employees was utilized in the project trip generation forecast. For purposes of the project trip generation forecast, it was assumed for both the proposed project and the existing site use that there is one employee for each for-sale/for-rent unit. This approach is consistent with the Trip Generation manual, which indicates that the most reliable forecast of trips for most land uses can be calculated based on occupancy figures (e.g., based on the number of employees for office buildings, or based on the number of students for schools, etc.). It should be noted that the basis for the number of employees per unit is based on the average unit size of approximately 343 square feet (i.e., 18,500 square feet ± 54 units = 343 square feet) and 298 square feet (i.e., 12,500 square feet _ 42 units = 298 square feet) for the proposed project and existing site use, respectively. 8.1 Project Trip Generation Forecast The proposed 200 Pier Avenue project trip generation forecast is summarized in Table 2. As presented in Table 2, the proposed project is expected to generate a net increase of six vehicle trips (five inbound trips and one outbound trip) during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, the proposed project is expected to generate a net increase of six vehicle trips (one inbound trip and five outbound trips). Over a 24-hour period, the proposed project is forecast to generate a net increase of 40 daily trip ends during a typical weekday (20 inbound trips and 20 outbound trips). O: JOt3_,F/LF13487\\report 3487-Rpt2.wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 23 City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN NGINE FRS Table 2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY [1] 200 Pier Avenue Project 13 -Sep -2004 LAND USE SIZE DAILY TRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES [2] PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES [2] IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Proposed Project Office Condominium 54 [3] Employees 179 23 3 26 4 21 25 Subtotal Proposed 179 23 3 26 4 21 25 Less Existing Use General Office 42 [3] Employees 139 18 2 20 3 16 19 Subtotal Existing 139 18 2 20 3 16 19 NET INCREASE 40 5 1 6 1 5 6 [1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 6th Edition, 1997. [2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. [3] ITE Land Use Code 710 (General Office Building) trip generation average rates for number of employees. For purposes of the trip generation forecast, it was assumed for both the proposed project and existing use that there is one employee per unit. This approach is consistent with the "Trip Generation" manual, which indicates that the most reliable forecast of trips for most land uses can be calculated based on occupancy figures (e.g., based on the number of employees for office buildings, or based on the number of students for schools). It should be noted that the basis for number of employees per unit is based on the average unit size of approximately 343 square feet (i.e., 18,500 squaree / 54 units = 343 square feet) and 298 square feet (i.e., 12,500 square feet / 42 units = 298 square feet) for the proposed project and existing use, respectively. 24 LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 9.0 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION Project traffic was assigned to the local roadway system based on a traffic distribution pattern that reflects the proposed project land use, the existing site and proposed project site access schemes, existing traffic movements, characteristics of the surrounding roadway system, and nearby residential areas. The trip generation forecasts for the proposed 200 Pier Avenue project were assigned to the surrounding local roadway systems based on the previously described distribution pattern. The project traffic distribution percentages forecast for the four study intersections are provided in Figure 7. The forecast project traffic volumes for study intersections during the AM and PM peak commuter hours are displayed in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. O: AJOB _FIL Ei3487ireport'.3487-Rpt2. wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 25 City of Hermosa Beach, California MI MN NS I s all N In— UN I— r Ng MI MN NM MI MI N ON o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f7.dwg LDP 14:01:21 09/13/2004 rodriquez T z a Z T T 70 N 1O3POad 3f1N3AV 2131d OOZ -0 x 2. m 0 H x --a0 x -n cc Om z -.I 1 I E UN S E N I NB— ! S 1 M-- N i 11111 o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f8.dwq LOP 14:01:32 09/13/2004 rodriquez T z n z m in 70 1O3POad 311N3AV Z13Id OOZ V 70 0 C m n vo� on m Or G) C c m m (n Co S NM 11111 N 1111 1 111111 N M NM I I all 11111 1 NM MN EN I N 00 o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f9.dwg LDP 14:01:44 09/13/2004 rodriquez T z CI z rn rn Pe N 1.93PO2ld 3f1N3AV Id3Id OOZ V X 0 C m n - a-I - D 071 mn c m� 73C C O� cmm XI V) co LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 10.0 CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS A forecast of on -street traffic conditions prior to the occupancy of the proposed project was prepared by incorporating the potential trips associated with other known development projects (related projects) in the area. With this information, the potential impact of the proposed project can be evaluated within the context of the cumulative impact of all ongoing development. The related projects research was based on information provided by City of Hermosa Beach staff. The list of related projects in the project study area is presented in Table 3. The location of the related projects is displayed in Figure 10. Traffic volumes expected to be generated by the related projects were estimated using accepted generation rates published in the ITE Trip Generation manual. The related projects' respective traffic generation for the weekday AM and PM peak commuter hours, as well as on a daily basis for a typical weekday, is presented in Table 4. The anticipated distribution of the related projects' traffic volumes at the four study intersections during the AM and PM peak commuter hours is illustrated in Figures 11 and 12, respectively. 10.1 Ambient Traffic Growth Factor In order to account for unknown related projects not included in this analysis, the existing traffic volumes were increased at an annual rate of one percent (1.0%) per year to the year 2006 (i.e., the anticipated year of project build -out). The ambient growth factor was based on review of the background traffic growth estimates for the South Bay area published in the 2004 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County, which indicate that existing traffic volumes would be expected to increase at an annual rate of approximately 1.0 percent (1.0% per year) between 1998 and 2010. Application of this annual growth factor accounts for ambient growth of future traffic volumes in the area associated with unknown related projects and those related projects located outside of the study area. Application of this annual ambient growth factor in addition to the forecast traffic generated by the related projects allows for a conservative worst case forecast of future traffic volumes in the area. C'JOA._F1 t. E;3487;report13487-Rpt2. wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 29 City of Hermosa Beach, California 1 t t LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN I N c, I N I U P ti Table 3 LIST OF RELATED PROJECTS [1] 200 Pier Avenue Project 13 -Seo -2004 MAP NO. PROJECT NAME LOCATION LAND USE SIZE STATUS 1 Hermosa Pavilion 1605 Pacific Coast Highway Mixed -Use [2] 102,100 SF Under Construction 2 P.C.H. Office Building 2900 Pacific Coast Highway General Office 5,000 SF Approved 3 Say -On Drugstore 155 Pacific Coast Highway Drugstore 13,200 SF Completed 4 Office Expansion 824 First Street General Office 1,100 SF Pending 5 Commercial/ Residential Mixed -Use 30 Hermosa Avenue Mixed -Use 2,300 SF Pending [1]Source: City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department. [2] The Hermosa Pavilion project includes health club, retail, office and restaurant land uses. 30 0 w u_ LOCATION OF RELATED PROJECTS 200 PIER AVENUE PROJECT Z r U UJ z�Lej -i-3V H at W W z z W zanbppoJ 400Z/£ l/60 09:L0:41 dal 6M3"0 LJ\6MP\L94£\0Ii1—qo!\:o 1111 111111 NM MI NW 11111 NMI MI IMO IMP 111111 11111 NM ER NMI MI t t 1 e t t t m 1 LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN N C; I N F F K ti Table 4 RELATED PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION [1] 200 Pier Avenue Project 13 -Sep -2004 LAND USE SIZE DAILY TRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES [2] PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES [2] IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL 1 Health Club [3] 45,000 GSF 2,778 6 7 13 118 . 75 193 General Office [4] 16,000 GSF 176 22 3 25 4 20 24 Restaurant [5] 4,000 GSF 521 19 18 37 26 17 43 Retail [6] 16,500 GLSF 708 10 7 17 30 32 62 Less 50% Pass -by [7] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spa [3] 11,600 GSF 348 2 2 4 30 19 49 Medical Rehab. [8] 9,000 GSF 325 17 4 21 9 24 33 Subtotal No. 1 4,856 76 41 117 217 187 404 2 General Office [4] 5,000 GSF 55 7 1 8 1 6 7 3 Drugstore With Drive -Through 13,200 GSF 145 18 2 20 3 16 19 Service Lane [9] Less 50% Pass -by [7] (73) (9) (1) (10) (2) (8) (10) Subtotal No. 3 72 9 1 10 1 8 9 4 General Office [4] 1,100 GSF 12 2 0 2 0 1 1 5 Retail [6] 1,150 GLSF 49 1 0 1 2 2 4 Less 50% Pass -by [7] (25) (1) 0 (1) (1) (1) (2) General Office [4] 1,150 GSF 13 2 0 2 0 1 1 Subtotal No. 5 37 2 0 2 1 2 3 TOTAL 5,032 96 43 139 220 204 424 [1] Source: ITE 'Trip Generation", 6th Edition, 1997. [2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. [3] ITE Land Use Code 493 (Health Club) trip generation average rates. [4] ITE Land Use Code 710 (General Office) trip generation average rates. [5] ITE Land Use Code 832 (High -Turnover [Sit -Down] Restaurant) trip generation average rates. [6] ITE Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center) trip generation average rates. [7] Pass -by trip reduction based on City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation policy on pass -by trips. [8] ITE Land Use Code 720 (Medical -Dental Office Building) trip generation average rates. [9] ITE Land Use Code 881 (Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive -Through Window) trip generation average rates. 32 w 1111111 O 111111 UN O U MD M I 1111111 O WI AI R M MN E o:\job_lfle\3487\dwg\111 dwg LDP 14:03:16 09/13/2004 rodr'iquez 133102id 3f1N3AV 2i3Id OOZ xJ v Dn • w C7 M O -n C7 -n m0 c u o m cm i-- NM NS NM N MO NM— N E _INN, O S OK — NM NS W o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f12.dwg LDP 14:03:27 09/13/2004 rodriquez 103f OHd 3f1N3AV L131d OOZ LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 11.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND METHODOLOGY The four study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method of analysis which determines Volume -to -Capacity (v/c) ratios on a critical lane basis. The overall intersection v/c ratio is subsequently assigned a Level of Service (LOS) value to describe intersection operations. The Levels of Service vary from LOS A (free flow) to LOS F (jammed condition). A description of the ICU method and corresponding Levels of Service is provided in Appendix B. The unsignalized study intersections were also analyzed using methodology included in the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209 (HCM), published by the Transportation Research Board, 2000. According to the HCM, the level of service for an unsignalized intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. For a two-way stop controlled intersection, although delay values are not defined for the intersection as a whole, they can be calculated. The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, geometrics, traffic and incidents. Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during conditions with ideal geometrics and in the absence of incidents, control, traffic, or geometric delay. The HCM quantifies only that portion of total delay attributed to traffic control measures, either traffic signals or stop signs. This delay is called control delay and includes initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Average control delay for any particular movement is a function of the capacity of the approach and the degree of saturation. A description of the HCM method of analysis and Levels of Service explanation is provided in Appendix C. 11.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds The relative impact of the added project traffic volumes expected to be generated by the proposed 200 Pier Avenue project during the AM and PM peak commuter hours was evaluated based on analysis of future operating conditions at the four study intersections, without and then with the proposed project. The previously discussed capacity analysis procedures were utilized to evaluate the future volume -to -capacity relationships and service level characteristics at each study intersection. O: AJOBFIL Ei3487'✓epoiit3487-Rpt2. wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 35 City of Hermosa Beach, California 1 1 1 1 1 1 LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS The significance of the potential impacts of project generated traffic at each study intersection was identified using the traffic impact criteria employed in previous analyses for projects in the City of Hermosa Beach. A significant transportation impact is determined based on the sliding scale criteria presented in Table 5. Table 5 INTERSECTION IMPACT THRESHOLD CRITERIA 200 Pier Avenue Project Final v/c Level of Service Project Related Increase in v/c >0.81-0.90 D - signalized equal to or greater than 0.02 >0.91 or greater E/F - signalized equal to or greater than 0.01 Drop in LOS by one level D/E - unsignalized equal to or greater than 0.01 As indicated in Table 5, the project -related increase in v/c ratios for the signalized intersections which defines a significant impact varies with LOS. At LOS D the threshold of significance is an increase of 0.02 or greater in the v/c ratio for signalized intersections. This is reduced to 0.01 or greater under LOS E and F. Similarly, for the unsignalized intersections, a decrease in LOS by one level or more is considered significant for those locations operating at LOS D, E, or F. The ICU calculations use a lane capacity of 1,600 vehicles per hour (vph) for left -turn, through and right -turn lanes, and a dual turn lane capacity of 2,880 vph. However, for those study intersections where protected left -turn phasing has been installed (e.g., Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue), a lane capacity of 1,200 vph was utilized. A clearance interval of 0.10 is also included in the ICU calculations. O:'.JO13..._FII.E;3467eeport43487-Ro 2 wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 36 City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS As previously mentioned, an annual one percent (1.0%) ambient growth rate was assumed so as to account for unknown related projects in the vicinity of the proposed project. Additionally, it was assumed that the build -out of the proposed project including both components will be complete and the building fully occupied by the end of the year 2006. 11.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios Level of Service calculations have been prepared for the following scenarios: (e) (0 (g) (h) (i) Existing traffic conditions. Condition (a) plus one percent (1.0%) ambient traffic growth up through year 2006. Condition (b) with completion and occupancy of the related projects. Condition © with completion and occupancy of the proposed project (year 2006). Condition (d) with implementation project mitigation measures, where necessary. The traffic volumes for each new condition were added to the volumes in the prior condition to determine the change in capacity utilization at the four study intersections. Summaries of the v/c ratios and LOS values for the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak commuter hours are shown in Table 6. The proposed project ICU data worksheets for the analyzed intersections during the AM and PM peak commuter hours are contained in Appendix B. The proposed project HCM data worksheets for the unsignalized study intersections during the AM and PM peak commuter hours are provided in Appendix C. O 'JOB_FIL E0487''report13487-Rpt2. wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 37 City of Hermosa Beach, California t 1 1 1 1 t 1 LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN f N (; INF ER ti Table 6 ICU & HCM SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS AND LEVELS OF SERVICE AM AND PM PEAK HOURS 200 Pier Avenue Project 13 -Seo -2004 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION (ICU) NO. INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR [1] YEAR 2004 EXISTING V/C LOS [2] YEAR 2006 W/ AMBIENT GROWTH V/C LOS [3] YEAR 2006 FUTURE PRE -PROJECT V/C LOS [4] YEAR 2006 W/ PROPOSED PROJECT V/C LOS CHANGE SIGNIF. V/C IMPACT [(4)-(3)] (A) 1 Hermosa Avenue/ Pier Avenue AM PM 0.540 A 0.522 A 0.548 A 0.530 A 0.552 A 0.544 A 0.553 A 0.545 A 0.001 NO 0.001 NO UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM) NO. INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR/ APP. [1] YEAR 2004 EXISTING Delay LOS [2] YEAR 2006 W/ AMBIENT GROWTH Delay LOS [3] YEAR 2006 FUTURE PRE -PROJECT Delay LOS [4] YEAR 2006 W/ PROPOSED PROJECT Delay LOS CHANGE SIGNIF. V/C IMPACT [(4)-(3)] (A) 2 Manhattan Avenue/ Pier Avenue AM NB SB PSI NB SB 14.0 B 9.7 A 15.9 C 10.8 B 14.3 B 9.7 A 16.4 C 10.8 B 14.4 B 9.8 A 16.9 C 11.0 B 14.4 B 9.8 A 17.0 C 11.0 B 0.0 NO 0.0 NO 0.1 NO 0.0 NO 3 Bayview Drive/ Pier Avenue AM NB SB EM NB SB 10.0 A 11.0 B 11.6 B 9.5 A 10.0 A 11.1 B 11.7 B 9.5 A 10.0 A 11.1 B 11.9 B 9.5 A 10.0 A 11.2 B 11.9 B 9.5 A 0.0 NO 0.1 NO 0.0 NO 0.0 NO 4 Monterey Boulevard/ Pier Avenue AM PM 11.61 B 14.55 B 11.79 B 12.79 B 11.92 B 15.67 C 11.94 B 15.70 C 0.02 NO 0.03 NO [A] The intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows: Final v/c LOS >= 0.81 - 0.90 D - signalized >= 0.91 or greater E/F - signalized Drop LOS by one level D/E/F - unsignalized 38 Project Related Increase in v/c greater than 0.02 equal to or greater than 0.02 equal to or greater than 0.01 LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 12.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 12.1 Existing Conditions As indicated in Column [1] of Table 6, all four study intersections are presently operating at LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak commuter hours under existing conditions. As previously mentioned, the existing traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak commuter hours are displayed in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. 12.2 Existing With Ambient Growth Conditions Growth in traffic due to the combined effects of continuing development, intensification of existing development, and other factors, were assumed to be one percent (1.0%) per year through year 2006. This ambient growth incrementally increases the Volume -to -Capacity ratios at all of the study intersections. As shown in Column [2] of Table 6, all four study intersections are expected to continue operating at LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak commuter hours with the addition of ambient growth traffic. The existing with ambient growth traffic volumes at the study intersections for the AM and PM peak commuter hours are displayed in Figures 13 and 14, respectively. 12.3 Future Pre -Project Conditions The Levels of Service at all four study intersections are incrementally increased by the addition of traffic generated by the related projects listed in Table 3. As presented in Column [3] of Table 6, all four study intersections are expected to operate at LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak commuter hours with the addition of growth in ambient traffic and the traffic due to the related projects. The future pre -project (existing, ambient growth and related projects) traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak commuter hours are shown in Figures 15 and 16, respectively. O .IO8 IC. E\3487'\repor1,3487-Rpt2. wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 39 City of Hermosa Beach, California WO N-- OW OW NW s NW M s— all WO OW WM WO E MI 0 o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f13.dwg LDP 14:03:40 09/13/2004 rodriquez T z z T ITS 7a m X 0) Z C) v I 13 T>Tvo N 1 gOnZ T DC C°— ?m�XIC o=C0m i c m _a 2JCAiw r — MI all an r — i all MS r a— -- all N MS o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f14.dwg LDP 14:03:59 09/13/2004 rodriquez rn*Z rnv' ,3c2,0 D Z m CnX H Z 0 D 2 N NM M 1 r r N NM IN NB MN N 111111 S M MN NM all o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f15.dwg LDP 14:04:09 09/13/2004 rodriquez m z z m m Po N rn�Z rn<c (39-10 -vz NX71 m %.• s 0 n913m SFO; m� �G) CL� oomm mC mO (!) -I CJS S M M MN M MN 1 I MI OM 1 N M IIIIII r M MI an N o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f16 dwg LDP 14:04:21 09/13/2004 rodriquez '1 C Urn N � m mmC Qomm mCal0 LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 12.4 Future With Project Conditions As shown in column [4] Table 6, application of the City's threshold criteria to the "With Proposed Project" scenario indicates that the proposed project is not expected to create significant impacts at any of the eight study intersections. Incremental but not significant impacts are noted at the study intersections as indicated in Table 6. As there are no significant impacts, no traffic mitigation measures are required or recommended for the study intersections. The future with project (existing, ambient growth, related projects and project) traffic volumes at the study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours are shown in Figures 17 and 18, respectively. 4/ 8,_. FI i. F_ ;3437\report '3487 -Rpt 2. wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 44 City of Hermosa Beach, California MI r— Oa M I I— MI S N N MN I N all S— i J1 o:\job_fi a\3487\dwg\f 17 dwg LDP 14:04:32 09/13/2004 rodriquez '1 C > r- mC - m N: -* 8Om_I mmn <71 COxG) mmrOC ooKmm me mQ S N N r M I MI OM M 1 i M M MO OM I r 1 MI a' o:\job_file\3487\dwg\f18.dwg LDP 14:04:42 09/13/2004 rodriquez m T C V 1 1 Um pN ,i ` om m m n ,l C 0G) mrn rQC C`7J ooEmm me mC)-1. 9x C/)—IOo LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 14.0 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT The Congestion Management Program (CMP) is a state -mandated program that was enacted by the State Legislature with the passage of Proposition 111 in 1990. The program is intended to address the impact of local growth on the regional transportation system. In Los Angeles County, the CMP is administered by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. As required by the 2004 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County, a Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) has been prepared to determine the potential impacts on designated monitoring locations on the CMP highway system. The analysis has been prepared in accordance with procedures outlined in the 2004 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County, County of Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, July, 2004. 14.1 Intersections The following CMP intersection monitoring location in the project vicinity has been identified: CMP Station Int. No. 22 Intersection Pacific Coast Highway/Artesia Boulevard -Gould Avenue The CMP TIA guidelines require that intersection monitoring locations must be examined if the proposed project will add 50 or more trips during either the AM or PM weekday peak periods. The proposed project will not add 50 or more trips during the AM or PM peak hours at the three CMP monitoring intersections which is the threshold for preparing a traffic impact assessment, as stated in the CMP manual. Therefore, no further review of potential impacts to intersection monitoring locations which are part of the CMP highway system is required. 0'..10B FILE134871report 3487-Rpt2.wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 47 City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 14.2 Freeways There are no CMP freeway monitoring locations in the project vicinity. Further, the CMP TIA guidelines require that freeway monitoring locations must be examined if the proposed project will add 150 or more trips (in either direction) during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours. The proposed project will not add 150 or more trips (in either direction) during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours to the CMP freeway monitoring locations which is the threshold for preparing a traffic impact assessment, as stated in the CMP manual. Therefore, no further review of potential impacts to freeway monitoring locations which are part of the CMP highway system is required. O:UOr3.,-FILE 3J8 eport \348 %-Rpt 2. wpd Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 48 City of Hermosa Beach, California LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 15.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on City of Hermosa Beach threshold criteria, it is concluded that no significant traffic impacts will occur at the study intersections following the construction and occupancy of the proposed project. Incremental, but not significant impacts are forecast at the study intersections during the morning and afternoon peak commuter hours. It is concluded that as a total of 56 on-site parking spaces is planned to be provided as part of the proposed project, the parking supply meets the Coastal Zone requirement of 56 parking spaces for general office use. As an office condominium use, a requirement for 54 parking spaces is forecast is required for the proposed project. In addition, based on the removal of the existing site driveway on Pier Avenue, it is anticipated that the City of Hermosa Beach will be able to provide additional on -street angle meter parking spaces (approximately four spaces) on the south side of Pier Avenue adjacent to the project site. O LJOI3 FIL EIS,: Traffic and Parking Analysis 200 Pier Avenue Project 49 City of Hermosa Beach, California OCT i 'I ?Om 1 PARCEL 2,900 S.F. SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT OM DSV DEpT SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL MAP NO. 26814 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 16 OF TRACT NO. 1074, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 17 PAGE 137 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. ROBERT S. CORRY SUBDIVIDER'S RECORD OWNER: ROBERT S. CORRY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ROBERT S. CORRY FAMILY TRUST, DATED APRIL 29, 2003, AS MAY BE AMENDED AND THE SPOUSE OF ROBERT S. CORRY THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 2 UNITS, WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. EASEMENT OF WARREN GILLELEN, FOR WATER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617, PAGE 47 OF DEEDS. SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SS. 0 L. ON U1 ; 2 CPA : FORE ME, ‘'Ltti A NOTAR PUBLIC, PERSONA LY APPE RED PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY TH EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSONS) WHOSE NAME) IS/ftRE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WI IN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT E/6 -K ----/-THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/IjTHCIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(.I€S)-AND THAT BY HIS/H€R/E4R SIGNATURE - ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. ENGINEER'S STATEMENT ro,u WITNESS MY HAND: PRINT NAME OF NOTARY CS1-4V---kitY-PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS NOTARY' PUBLIC IN AND / FOR SAID STATE IS IN MY COMMISSION EX OUNTY THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF ROBERT S. CORRY ON 09-18-03. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. GARY J. ROEHL R.C.E. 30826 EXPIRATION: 03-31-06 RECORD DATA WAS TAKEN FROM TRACT NO. 1074, M.B. 17-137 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. [Gov,4,0 PONAI,P. L. ‘10Ll& /waft( CITY ENGINEER DATE DEPUTY R.C.E. O2.02-73 EXPIRES 9-31-lJS-- COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP; THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER. COUNTY ENGINEER BY DEPUTY R.C.E. NO. EXPIRES CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE ____ DAY OF , 20___ APPORVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 20_ . SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE SCALE: 1" = 20' SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL NAP NO. 26814 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES • • • INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP * TRACT NO. 1074 M.B. 17-137 30' 30' W z W MANHATTAN fFD WELL MON. PER PARCEL MAP NO. 25900 P.M.B. 298-45 6 0' N1 2°10'00"W 6 0' 30' 30' 0 O Z 6TH STREET N77'S0'00"E S'LY LINE OF LOT 17 * N7T50'00"E III 0 O N • 100.00' 1 2,900 SQ. FT. • 100.00' • • •� 0 0 O 0r N N 4z N7750'00"E N'LY LINE OF LOT 15 * AND PARCEL MAP NO. 25900 P.M.B. 298-45 4TH STREET FD P.K. PER TRACT NO. 33370 M.B. 882-79 2 0' 10' 10' 2 10' N12'10'00"W W 0 W 0' 10' ONE PARCEL 3,009 S.F. PARCEL NI SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS AP NO. 26936 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 30 AND A PORTION OF LOT 35 OF TRACT NO. 1069, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 17 PAGE 136 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. RECORD OWNER: 1449 MONTEREY, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY SUBDIVIDER THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 2 UNITS WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY1OF { �'�.� ON V�K no BEFORE ME, t i r Jc- A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSLLY APPEARED C a PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE B IS OF SATIS EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES) AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. Lk (' DNr: r - FACTORY TO THE WITHIN THE SAME IN SIGNATURE(S) WHICH THE WITNESS MY HAND: L NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE NAME: z,CAct4P-CAel ( INT NAME OF NOTARY MY PRINCIPAL , LACE 0 BUSINESS IS IN L COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES �' Zc_- CT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT OCT 1 2 2004 COM. DEV. DEPT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF DENNIS HARTLEY ON 04-10-03 I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. GARY J. ROEHL R.C.E. 30826 EXPIRATION: 03-31-04 RECORD DATA WAS TAKEN FROM PARCEL MAP NO. 25265, P.M.B. 298-91-92 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY ENGINEER'S CERETIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. JAMES A. NOYES CITY ENGINEER DEPUTY R.C.E. EXPIRES ____ COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP, THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER. COUNTY ENGINEER BY DEPUTY RCE NO. DATE EXPIRES ___________ CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE ____ DAY OF 20__ APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 200_. SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE SCALE: 1"=20' SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL N AP \0. 26936 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES • • • INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP * TRACT NO. 1069 M.B. 17-136 N 12-10'00"W 10' w 0 w CO 10' 2 2 0' 0' 10' 0 O O 10' FD S&W PER PM NO. 25265 P.M.B. 298-91-92 16TH STREET N 7750'00"E S'LY LINE OF LOT 29 * N 77-50'00"E O N'LY LINE OF LOT 35 * O 0 100.00' 100.00' 1 A = 3,009 SQ FT • 0 0 • 0 m O 0 0 M N • N 7750'00"E S'LY LINE OF INST. NO. 03-0363110, R.E.C. 02-06-03, O.R. z 40' 40' 8 0' 8 0' FD SPIKE PER PM NO. 25265 P.M.B. 298-91-92 BOULEVARD -8 MONTEREY 40' 1 PARCEL 5,606 S.F. SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL NAP NO. 27099 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14 OF J.M. FLOORES SUBDIVISION, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 9, PAGE 127 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. KEN ZIEGLER L, SUBDIVIDER RECORD OWNER: VALLEY DUNES, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 2 UNITS, WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF J SS. Q,Lua) ON (-ThN A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(Sr WHOSE NAMES)- IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY 'EXECUTED THE SAME I HIS/H.ER/THEtR' AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(4ES) 'AND THAT BY HIS/I-FER/THEIR SIGNATURECS)` ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND: NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE ENGINEER'S STATEMENT O C r 0 6 2804 COM. DEV. DEPT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF KEN ZIEGLER ON 05-17-04. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. GARY J. ROEHL / R.C.E. 30826 EXPIRATION: 03-31-06 RECORD DATA WAS TAKEN FROM J.M FLOORES SUBDIVISION, M.B. 9-127 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. V NAME: 1 2 -L� e \A • > rG Vl PRINT NAME OF NOTARY MY PRINCIPAL LACE Of BUSINESS IS IN L.GS El IA 9 e5 COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ;1._' �'j ' C i CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH. RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. DONALD L. WOLF CITY ENGINEER DEPUTY R.C.E. OZUZ 73 EXPIRES 9-3O —OS COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE to%4 DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP; THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER. COUNTY ENGINEER BY DEPUTY R.C.E. NO. EXPIRES CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE ____ DAY OF , 20___ APPORVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 20___. SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE 4 SCALE: 1" = 20' SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL VAP NO. 27099 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES • • • INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP * J.M. FLOORE'S SUBDIVISION M.B. 9-127 17TH STREET 0 0 N76'34'00"E N76'34'00"E 0 0 N E'LY LINE OF LOT 15 * z • 40.00' • • • 1 O cn 5,606 SQ. FT. 40.00' • O Ut • • N 76'34'00" E S'LY LINE OF LOT 14 * z (-•1 N a) O O FD SPK IN LIEU OF PK NAIL PER PM NO. 25320 P.M.B. 293-88-89 W'LY LINE OF LOT 13 * 16TH STREET FD PK NAIL PER PM NO. 25320 P.M.B. 293-88-89 111