Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/11/05ft CITY CLERK "The best preparation for tomorrow is to do today's work superbly well." - Sir William Osler AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 11, 2005 - Council Chambers, City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK Art Yoon Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER J. R. Reviczky John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Sam Y. Edgerton Stephen R. Burrell Michael Keegan CITY ATTORNEY Peter Tucker Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer. City Councilagendas and staff reports are available for your review on the City's web site located at www.hermosabch.org CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS PROCLAMATIONS & PRESENTATIONS PEAK FLEX YOUR POWER NOW! POSTER CONTEST WINNERS CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION HERMOSA BEACH YOUTH BASKETBALL LEGAL L PRESENTATION BY TEEN LEADERSHIP HERMOSA BEACH PRESENTATION ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE MAYOR'S SELECT COMMITTEE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda as a business item. 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction, or to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar, may do so at this time. Comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Comments from the public are limited to three minutes per speaker. Members of the audience may also speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; and, 3) during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. The City Council acknowledges receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in written communications. The Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 2 • • 1. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS a. Letter from Roger Creighton dated December 11, 2004 regarding underground utility hook up cost. b. Letter from Roger Creighton dated December 14, 2004 regarding the City's campaign finance law. c. Letter from Roger Creighton dated November 10, 2004 regarding business licenses for businesses doing work for the City. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the -City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 4, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on December 14, 2004. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the November 2004 financial reports: (e) 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. Recommendation to adopt a resolution acknowledging the receipt, filing and approval of the annual statement of investment policy and delegating investment authority to the City Treasurer for the year 2005. Memorandum from City Treasurer John Workman dated January 3, 2005. Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of December 15, 2004. Recommendation to receive and file Project Status Report. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated December 30, 2004. (h) Recommendation to accept the following donations: (1) Mer -Maid Restaurant — Q.L. Thelen $50.00 To be used for the New Year's celebration Ro-Al, Incorporated — Patrick Molloy's $250.00 To be used for the New Year's celebration Howard Rumsey $200.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Jeri Coates $25.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Alphonso & Mary Ocampo $25.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Bruce & Kathleen Eddy $40.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Ja77 Memorial account.) Beach Cities Entertainment/Vivian $40.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Nicholas & Rosemarie Penque $40.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Christina Scholten/ Johnny Clayton, Jr. $50.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Joseph & Lynn Callinan $100.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Willis & Kay Aiken $100.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Willis & Kay Aiken $20.00 To be used for Ja77 Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) J.E. & Flora Walker $20.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) David M. Sherr $20.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Betty Hoover $20.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Donald & Margaret Queitzsch $20.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) The Pepys Trust, Mark Pepys, Trustee $20.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Richard H. Meine — Builder $20.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Paul Salata — G.A. S. Investment Account $20.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Darlene Chan, Festival Productions $100.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Hennessey's Tavern, Incorporated $1,000.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) Beach Market, Incorporated $600.00 To be used for the D.A.R.E. program. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 30, 2004. Recommendation to reject the single bid received for Project No. CIP 02-612 Public Works Yard Renovation, Phase I — Oil Well Abandonment; waive the requirement for Labor & Material, Performance, and Bidder's Bonds; and, authorize staff to re -advertise for bids and invite the previous participating bidder to re -bid. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated January 5, 2005. 4 • • (j) Recommendation to deny the following claim and refer it to the City's Liability Claims Administrator. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated January 3, 2005. Claimant: Hauser, Julius Date of Loss: 10-15-04 Date Filed: 12-02-04 Allegation: Vehicle damaged by police car (k) Recommendation to authorize the purchase of twenty (20) Sony digital recorders for the traffic and patrol officers at a total cost of $6,968.58. Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin dated December 29, 2004. (1) Recommendation to authorize the purchase and installation of new lockers for the men and women's locker rooms in the Police Station by Engineered Storage Systems, Inc., City of Industry, California in the amount of $17,996.00 (tax included). Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin dated December 29, 2004. (m) Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of December 7, 2004. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. a. HEAR AND CONSIDER PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) AND THE REPORT, AND TO RECEIVE AND COUNT THE BALLOTS FOR AND AGAINST THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. RECOMMENDATION: Depending on result of the balloting, City Council should either: 1. Adopt resolution making determinations, confirming assessments and proceedings, and ordering the acquisition of the improvements, designating the City Treasurer to collect and receive assessments and to establish a special fund for Assessment District No. 2004-2 (Bayview Drive); or, 2. Receive and file report. 5 • • 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. REPORT ON FULL DEPLOYMENT OF WIFI SYSTEM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated January 5, 2005. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive the additional information that was requested at the 11/9/04 meeting and that the City Council determine whether or not it wishes to proceed with the full deployment of the Wifi system. If the City Council decides to proceed with the full deployment of the wifi system, direct the City Manager to sign a sole source contract with LA Unplugged based on the attached proposal dated 9/28/04; appropriate $126,496 from the Equipment Replacement Fund to cover the cost of the system; authorize the City Manager to contract with Google for online ads in exchange for ad revenue; authorize the City Manager to contract with Ad Connect; direct the City Manager to enter into a service agreement with SCE for the installation of fiber to the City Hall to carry the bandwidth for both the wifi system and the City operations. b. REDUCTION IN STREET LIGIITING CITYWIDE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated January 4, 2005. RECOMMENDATION: Receive public comment concerning the reduction of street lighting in the test area north of 27`x' Street and west of Valley Drive and determine if this test should be terminated and lights turned back on or to leave lights off and continue this lighting reduction program citywide; and, consider directing staff to begin the process of balloting residents for approval to increase their Lighting/Landscaping District assessment by an amount less than 810 per year. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND RE PORTS - CITY MANAGER NONE 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 6 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. NONE ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on October 12, 2004. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Case Number: Briley v. City of Hermosa Beach B175411 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT LEADERSHIP A Preview of Teen Leadership Hermosa Beach A class project in conjunction with the 2004 Leadership Hermosa Beach Class Created by: Samantha Bruck 1 • • October 15, 2004 Press Release - The Leadership Hermosa Class of 2004 announces the addition of a junior leadership program to commence in early 2005. With the inclusion of 1 Mira Costa senior in this year's program, Samantha Bruck, the LHB class unanimously agreed that the class and the community would benefit with the incorporation of junior members to the organization. Samantha Bruck applied for the program in January 2004. At first LHB was not sure that they would be able to manage a minor in the class- no one planned for a high school junior to be interested in the curriculum. The LHB Directors worked with both Samantha & her mother to make certain that both understood the time commitments of the program and that LHB didn't interfere with her schoolwork or water polo. Director of LHB Curriculum & Recruiting Maureen Ferguson is Samantha's mentor and supported the future leader throughout the year with various tasks including facilitating the "The Greening of Hermosa" June class. Samantha's class project was to formalize a program that would include 6 Hermosa Beach teens for the upcoming year. The class would participate in all the scheduled LHB meetings and work on their own class project to be presented to City Council. Shannon Duffy (LHB 2004) will have responsibility as class mentor for the high school students. Applications will be available at the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and at the Mira Costa & Redondo High Schools. Potential members must be Hermosa Beach residents, will need a 3.0 GPA, a letter of recommendation from a school counselor or a Teacher's assistant, submit a written essay on why they would like to get involved with Leadership Hermosa and attend an Open House with a parent or guardian. Both Juniors and Seniors are encouraged to apply. Class tuition fee is $50 for the year. Additional information of Leadership Hermosa is available on www.leadershiphermora.org For more information, please contact About Leadership Hermosa: LHB is a yearlong program launched in 2003 to develop and educate existing and potential leaders within the city. The class explores the governmental. economic. environmental. and social systems of Hermosa Beach as presented by a variety of city leaders and officials including Mayor Art Yoon, the program founder and liaison for the City. • • Teen Leadership Hermosa Beach Goal: To structure a leadership class that demonstrates the inner workings of Hermosa Beach to high school students while enabling them the opportunity to design a project that gives back to their community and further the process in becoming leaders of the future. First Year Proposal I. To encourage application A. Include teen information in the LHB publications B. Distribute fliers to Mira Costa and Redondo Union HS II. Criteria for application A. Dues to be determined B. Hermosa Beach sophomore and junior students C. GPA 3.0 and above D. High school recommendation E. Personal statement of 150 words 1. Why would you like to be part of LHB, and what could you contribute? III. Class Size A. Select 6 students. 3 sophomores and 3 juniors B. Create a teen liaison position a. The teen liaison will be a past Leadership Hermosa Beach adult member willing to monitor the classes, and act as a guide to the teens. IV. Structure of Program A. Attend LHB monthly meetings 1. Encourage teens to monitor meetings to offer public speaking opportunities 2. Plan time for teen discussion at completion of speakers 3. Attendance at one city council meeting and one school board meeting (mandatory) B. Elect officers within the teen class 1. Class project manager 2. Secretary 3. Social Chairman a. Thank you notes to speakers b. Class email correspondence • • C. Allow teens to plan an annual project 1. Examples might include: a. Organizing a beach clean-up b. Planting flowers at a public site c. Reading to elementary children d. Joining Adopt A Beach—Heal The Bay e. Volunteering with Parks and Recreation department • • Teen Leadership Hermosa Beach Application Name: Age: Address Phone Number: Best Time to Reach You: School: Grade: GPA: E-mail What extra curricular activities do you participate in? This can include sports, drama, or band at school or any other activities outside of school. What types of community service projects do you participate in? Is there a certain area of service that you are passionate about? What area would you like to improve upon in our community? In a 150 -word paragraph, explain why you would like to be a part of Leadership Hermosa Beach and describe what you could bring to the program. You may use a separate sheet of paper. Teen Leadership Hermosa Beach Counselor/Teacher Recommendation Form Name: Age: School: Teachers/Counselors Name: Grade: Leadership Hermosa Beach offers the opportunity to learn about the inner our city while planning a communityworkings of great pride in the community. The Teen project to donate to our city. Participants develop students a chance to view the community Leadership livetin from os perspective It telalso n Beach program allow them to participate in city events of political nature.pp gram will give designed to further the growth of leadership in the teens of Hermosa Beac ultimately Please evaluate the ability of this student to be a memberh of Teen Leadership Hermosa Beach. In the letter please include how the you know the student, and what can bring to the program, you feel they • Parental Consent I give my child permission to apply to the Teen Leadership Hermosa Beach program and I fully understand the time commitment that the program entails. For further information, contact TeenLHB@yahoo.com or Christian Campisi Director of Leadership Hermosa Beach -Membership at (310) 753-2238 Signature: Date: Printed Name: Telephone Number: 1949 Tfie £igfitfiousei4�Stars 1971 In 1949 a bass player, Howard Rumsey and the owner of The Gightfiouse, John Levine created a world-renowned venue for jazz. Howard led the musicians, Tfise GigFitlrouse J4�Stars, who recorded "Live at 2lie Lighthouse" These great musicians are Howard's All Stars. Bud Shank Stan Levey Milt Bernhart Bob Enevoldsen Russ Freeman Lennie Niehaus Hampton Hawes Victor Feldman Conte Candoli Claude Williamson Shelly Manne Sonny Clark Richie Kamuca Jimmy Giuffre Herb Geller. Maynard Ferguson Bob Cooper Frank Rosolino Max Roach Stu Williamson Frank Patchen Dick Shreve Jack Costanzo Carlos Vidal 1 J a' • • 1 1961 The Jazz Messengers 1980 California Jazz was spawned in Hermosa Beach. The legend was spread by The Jazz Messengers, who formed in 1953 and played annually from 1961 to 1980, featuring Art Blakey, Horace Silver, Kenny Dorham, Hank Mobley, and Doug Watkins. Later Messengers included Donald Byrd, Bill Hardman,. Freddie Hubbard, Lee Morgan, Benny Golson, Curtis Fufler, Jackie McLean, Bobby Timmons, Cedar Walton, Walter Davis Jr., Woody Shaw and Wayne Shorter. • • LIGHTHOUSE JAZZ 2005 30 PIER AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH PHONE 310-372-6911, 310-376-9833 Jan. 8 (Sat.) The Hal Willis Band l lam-3pm No Cover Jan. 9 (Sun.) Buddy Childers, Marty Harris, Kristin Korb, Lorca Hart 11am- 3pm No Cover Jan. 13 (Thurs.) Charles Owens -tenor sax, Gary Matsumoto -piano, ?-bass, Nate Wood -drums 6-8:30pm No Cover Jan. 15 (Sat.) Gabriel Alegria (Peruvian Jazz) 11 am-3pm No Cover Jan. 16 (Sun.) Gabriel Alegria (Peruvian Jazz) 1 lam-3pm No Cover Jan. 20 (Thurs.) Ron Stout -trumpet, Marty Harris -piano, Kevin Kanner - drums 5-8:30pm No Cover Jan. 22 (Sat.) The Hal Willis Band l lam-3pm No Cover Jan. 23 (Sun.) Palos Verdes Peninsusula High School Band 1 lam-3pm No Cover Jan. 27 (Thurs.) Sam Most -flute & vocals, Marty Harris -piano, Putter Smith - bass, Dick Weller -drums 5-8:30pm No Cover Jan. 29 (Sat.) The Hal Willis Band 11 am-3pm No Cover Jan. 30 (Sun.) The Phil Norman Orchestra 11 am-3pm. Donations accepted for ringside tables! RESERVE YOUR. TABLE EARLY! Join the Jazz Alumni -Donate for Jazz plaques! For more Jazz Alumni info call Ozzie 310/937-4693 or 310/372-6911 • • • JAZZ SANGRIA -JANUARY 2005 68 Pier Ave., Hermosa Beach Jan. 5th Weds. Herman Riley -tenor sax, Art Hillery -piano, Richard Simon -bass, Roy McCurdy -drums, 6:30-9:30pm Jan. 12th Weds. Gabriel Alegria Peruvian Jazz, 6:30- 9:30pm Jan. 19th Weds. David Sills -tenor sax, Jamie Rosen -guitar, Putter Smith -bass, Todd Wolf -drums, 6:30-9:30pm Jan 26th Weds. Lorca Hart -drums, Josh Nelson -piano, Ryan Cross -bass, Louis Taylor -saxes, 6:30-9:30pm Join the Jazz Alumni! You can help our jazz cause for 2005. We are also accepting donations for the Jazz plaques honoring Jazz Messengers, Woody Herman, Stan Kenton, Lighthouse Allstars and others. Make plaque checks out to THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. For more info call 310/937-4693 or cadenajazz hotmail.com. • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 6, 2005 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: STEPHEN BURRELL, CITY MANAGER RE: HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE rr Recommendation: That the City Council receive the presentation by members of the Mayor's Select Committee and provide direction to staff to return with report evaluating the proposal and its implementation. i To: The Hermosa Beach City Council Fr: Steven Pinard, Chairman of The Select Committee for the Development of a Hermosa Beach Historic Preservation Plan Re: City Council Agenda Item for the Approval of the Hermosa Beach Historic Preservation Plan Date: January 5, 2005 Attached please find the complete Hermosa Beach Historic Preservation Plan developed by the Select Committee which will be presented to the City Council for their approval and adoption at the January 11, 2005 City Council meeting. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Plan proposes that the City Council approve, via formal vote, this Plan and its three action steps which are: A) Formation of a Historic Preservation Commission B) Commit to a Historic Resource Identification Survey C) Promote Historic Preservation by adopting four Incentive Programs Other Sections of the Plan include: - a detailed Historical Summary prepared by the Hermosa beach Historical Society -additional details of the proposed Incentives, including Mills Act Program -further details of the Survey need and the preparation of the RFP - an extensive Glossary of Terms and an Addendum This Plan includes input and suggestions by the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission, and its sub -committee, as well as the City Council sub -committee, In addition, extensive input was obtained from other Cities in Southern California, the Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento, CA, and certain outside experts on Historic Preservation Plans. We look forward to presenting this to the City Council. Please feel free to call me (318- 5851) or any of the Committee members if there are any questions. • • HERMOSA BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN A VOLUNTARY PROCESS FOR PRESERVATION OF HISTORIC OR CULTURAL LANDMARKS This Plan is designed to provide a Voluntary Process for property owners to apply for a Designated Historical Preservation Status for their properties and for the City of Hermosa Beach to promote a Historic Preservation Program. It includes the establishment of a Historical Preservation Commission, the Authorization of a Historical Survey for the City, and the adoption of an Incentive Program for preservation. The proposed Historic Preservation commission could not, and would not, place any home under a historical preservation protection designation without the owner's consent. • • • MISSION STATEMENT • To promote, preserve, and increase the public awareness of, Hermosa Beach's irreplaceable historic heritage so that its vital legacy of cultural, educational, recreational, aesthetic, economic, social, and environmental benefits will be maintained and enriched for present and future generations • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN A VOLUNTARY PROCESS Prepared by: The Select Committee for the development of a Hermosa Beach Historic Preservation Plan Members: Geoff Hirsch Cathy McCurdy Rick Koenig Steve Pinard - CHAIRMAN Mark Shoemaker With assistance from: Planning Commission Sub -Committee: Kent Allen Geoff Hirsch Peter Hoffman Steve Pinard City Council Sub -Committee Sam Edgerton Geoff Hirsch Steve Pinard Peter Tucker Presented to Hermosa Beach City Council on January 11, 2005 PRESERVATION PLAN -Inside page Last printed 12/27/2004 10:53 AM Page 1 of 1 • • TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION -Historic Preservation Goals -Purpose of Plan HISTORICAL SUMMARY ACTION STEPS TO BE APPROVED BY FORMAL VOTE OF THE CITY COUNCIL A. Formation of a Historic Preservation Commission B. Commit to a Comprehensive City Survey C. Establish Preservation Incentives as Outlined CITY SURVEY MILLS ACT -Introduction -Key Points and Cost Savings Detail -California Codes Relating to Mills Act Program GLOSSARY ADDENDUM -California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) -Section 106 Review -List of other reference subjects and documents available to the City on file Table of Contents Last printed 12/27/2004 10:52 AM Page 1 of 1 • • City of Hermosa Beach Historic Preservation Plan A VOLUNTARY PROGRAM Introduction Historic preservation is a vital key to maintaining the community's character and identity. The mission of the Hermosa Beach historic preservation program is to promote and preserve Hermosa Beach's irreplaceable historic heritage so that its vital legacy of cultural, educational, recreational, aesthetic, economic, social, and environmental benefits will be maintained and enriched for present and future generations. Preservation of historic resources such as buildings, structures, sites, and areas that reflect special elements of the city's diverse architectural, artistic, cultural, historical, and political history, fosters civic and neighborhood pride, forms the basis for a unique community identity, and enhances the visual character of the city. Preservation efforts help strengthen the local economy by attracting residents, tourists, and visitors to the city, and offering educational and recreation opportunities. Historic Preservation has been shown to improve property values within historic areas, and maintaining and reusing historic buildings conserves building materials and energy resources. This plan draws upon many of the wide variety of historical preservation resources offered by state, and federal offices as well as local volunteer preservation organizations, as well as assistance from the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission, Hermosa Beach Historical Commission, and the Redondo Beach Preservation Commission. The purpose of this preservation plan is to provide a proactive means of planning for the continued protection of the community's character and heritage. The goals are to educate and inform citizens of Hermosa Beach about the city's history as reflected in the built environment, increase the community's awareness of preservation issues, provide a guideline for growth and development, create a plan for the continued identification and designation of historic properties, develop new incentives for preservation, strengthen the support for preservation policies, and promote Hermosa Beach as a city sensitive to the preservation resources for the future. • • HISTORICAL SUMMARY • • DEFINITION OF HISTORICAL CHARACTER Prepared by Hermosa Beach Historical Society — Mark Shoemaker 10/04 PURPOSE: This document identifies, and chronologically summarizes, historic periods and events in Hermosa Beach history, that will aid in the identification of significant addresses that deserve recognition, and may be candidates for preservation. Early 1900's — Sand Dunes, Beach Resort and Early Growth: Hermosa Beach was originally part of the ten -mile Ocean frontage of Rancho Sausal Redondo. In the year of 1900 a tract of fifteen hundred acres was purchased for $35.00 per acre from A. E. Pomroy, then owner of the greater part of Rancho Sausal Redondo. Messrs. Burbank and Baker, agents, bought this land for Sherman and Clark who organized and retained the controlling interest in the Hermosa Beach Land and Water Company. Hermosa was one of several beach communities that grew up on the then distant outskirts of Los Angeles in the speculative era following Southern California's "Boom of the 1880s." The first Post Office was opened in 1903 inside the Pavilion building that was located at the west end of Santa Fe (now Pier Avenue). Early developments in the city shaped its touristy image and included such beach resort fixtures as the wooden pier in 1904, and the boardwalk (now reefed to as "The Strand) was built in 1905 from planks to form a 2 -mile walk 12-16' feet wide. Also in 1904, Sherman and Clark built the first electric transportation line into the city. The line, called the Los Angeles Pacific Railway, brought a number of prospective buyers from downtown Los Angeles into the slowly developing area. Additionally, the Santa Fe railway had been running through the Hermosa Beach valley (now the "Greenbelt") into Redondo since 1888. On Christmas Eve, 1906, Hermosa Beach held its first incorporation election and chose its first city officers. Hermosa Beach was duly incorporated and received its charter from the state as a sixth class city on January 14, 1907. The deed, handed over by the Hermosa Land and Water Co., stated that the ocean frontage "was to be held in perpetuity as a beach playground and for the benefit of not only the residents of Hermosa, but also for the sea - lovers of Southern California." Hermosa Ave. was the first street to be paved. Pier Avenue, from the beach to the railroad tracks, followed soon afterwards. Both were paved with asphalt from a plant built to supply local needs, located at Eighth St. and Hermosa Ave. (the plant burned down in 1908 and was not replaced). Housing growth during this period was primarily west of what is now called Pacific Coast Highway. The majority of very early structures in Hermosa Beach, outside the small downtown business core, were relatively modest homes lacking distinctive architectural features and can best be described as "beach cottages." Builders without formal architectural training apparently constructed many of these seasonal cottages and they were often of simple board and batten construction with minimal ornamentation. The fanciful Victorian architectural styles generally associated with the first decades of the 20k" Century as well as the organic art and Document in HISTORICAL SUMMARY 102204 Last printed 12/6/2004 3:17 PM 1 • • crafts (AKA craftsman) styles indigenous to Southern California in this era were found in only a small percentage of the city's early homes. 1910's — Municipalization: By 1913, Hermosa had 900 residents and a modest downtown business section. St. Cross Episcopal was the first church building erected in the city of Hermosa Beach — services were previously held in the Pavilion. Two schools had an enrollment of more than 100 students. In 1913 Hermosa acquired its first bank, suitably called The First Bank of Hermosa Beach, and located on the present Bank of America site at Pier and Hermosa Avenues. A second bank, First National, was located at the same intersection. t:nu.e.e tht Llwe. q+: rKr 1lr,mo.. :;. �� a During 1914, Hermosa acquired a city hall; the two-story brick building replaced a series of makeshift quarters on Pier Ave. and 13th St. It was also in 1914 that Hermosa completed its second pier, a 1,000 -foot concrete structure complete with small tiled pavilions along the sides to afford shade for fisherman and picnic parties. It replaced the 500 -foot wooden effort that was washed out to sea a year earlier. 1920's - More Business Street in Hermosa Beach. — Better Roads: The Biltmore Hotel stood on the Strand near 14th The building was originally built as the private "Surf and Sand Club" in 1923. The hotel was demolished in the late 1960's to create a parking lot, however the Targe indoor swimming pool that was located in the basement was not removed but merely covered over with sand. Another mark of progress for the city was the founding of the Hermosa Kiwanis Club in 1926, and the Hermosa Rotary Club six years later. 1 •�'- ' Bungalows from the 1920s and early 1930s were built •in both the craftsman and mission -revival styles, and even a few bungalow courts - one of Southern California's most distinctive residential innovations. The Bijou building, Bank of America, Hermosa Hotel and many other prominent structures in downtown today near Pier and Hermosa Avenue, can be readily identified in historic photos from the 1920s. The Bijou building, with its distinctive terra cotta facade, is certainly the most striking of these early buildings and worthy of its official designation as the city's first historic structure, but it is not alone in its representation of the architecture of the city's early commercial history. Pacific Coast Highway in the early twenties was still known as El Camino Real. From Pier Avenue north it was a dirt trail to Rosecrans; south of Pier Avenue it was a two-lane paved street into Redondo. About 1927 it was paved along its entire length in Hermosa and widened. Document in HISTORICAL SUMMARY 102204 Last printed 12/6/2004 3:17 PM 114,4 iIMO:L If LC • • 1930's — Earthquake & Rebuilding: By 1930 Hermosa had a population of about 3,000 persons, but the wheels of progress ground to a halt at this point. The stock market crash in 1929 and the subsequent bank failures in the early thirties hit the town hard. The original housing stock, including many homes of potential architectural interest today, was significantly diminished by the 1933 Long Beach earthquake and, of course, by subsequent redevelopment within the city. In 1933 the Long Beach earthquake shook residents to their foundations. No one was injured, but several buildings toppled and "chimneys and street lights came crashing down all over town." Hardest hit was Pier Avenue School (now the Art Deco inspired Community Center), which had to be rebuilt almost to its foundations. All three Hermosa Schools at that time, North South and Pier Ave. were reconstructed according to new earthquake codes the following year. In the mid -1930's Hermosa -gradually began to grow again, and finally began to change from a summer resort and retired persons town, to a year-round city. Vacant lots in the downtown business area began to disappear. Many small stores began opening up. Young married couples began moving into the area and long neglected areas of the city began to take shape. The "no-man's-land" along Valley Drive and up on the hills above Pacific Coast Highway started building up, changing Hermosa from a coastal settlement to a full-fledged city. Recreational living became the keynote of the revitalized city, and it was well equipped to handle it. 1940's — WWII & Jazz: During the 1930s and 1940s the general slowdown in new construction associated with the Depression and WWII was somewhat offset in Hermosa Beach by the growth in war related aviation jobs, and emerging trend of year-round living at the beach. The Lighthouse Cafe on Pier Avenue was j" managed by jazz legend Howard Rumsey. It 1....!1111,, became a focal point of jazz music in the early -dr "xii'-7-` • 1940's, and became the focus of the cool jazz scene in California well into the 1960's. As the city grew during this period, an eclectic mix of generally modest homes was constructed. Many of these homes, due to their small size and general lack of architectural distinction, were prime candidates for subsequent redevelopment and today represent a relatively small percentage of the city's housing. However, some of the remaining homes from this era were constructed in idiosyncratic architectural styles and/or on lots with substantial neighborhood prominence and contribute significantly to the contemporary city's distinctive townscape. 1950's — Surfing & Beat Scene:. Numerous surfboard shapers established businesses within Hermosa Beach and spearheaded the rapid growth of surfing throughout the United Sates - and the world. None was more influential than Dale Velzy who in early 1953 went into partnership with fellow Hermosa Beach surfer Harold "Hap" Jacobs, renting a little shop space Document in HISTORICAL SUMMARY 102204 Last printed 12/6/2004 3:17 PM up the street from the Hermosa Beach pier. There, they built custom boards under the Velzy- Jacobs label. The Tim Kelly statue represents both a memorial to a local waterman and a public reminder of Hemiosa's definitive role in the creation of the California surfer lifestyle that many consider the very essence of the city. From 1958-1963 "THE INSOMNIAC" was a very. happening Beatnik coffeehouse in Hermosa Beach, California. Just up from the pier and across the street from the already legendary Lighthouse jazz club, The Insomniac presented folk music of all sorts, blues, world music (that term was probably nonexistent), 'poetry and silent films. It occupied the whole half -block on Pier Avenue, complete with the largest selling bookstore and largest art gallery on the West Coast, sidewalk 1 cafe, sketch artist, you name it. In the 1950s and 1960s, new residential construction in Hermosa Beach tended to follow the regional trend to California ranch style homes. While the small Tots of Hermosa forced architectural compromises to the rambling, one - level style associated with classic ranch homes, many excellent examples of mid-century modern style ranches and their local variants can be found in the city 1960's — Skateboarding: The first skateboard contest was held in Hermosa Beach, CA in 1963 at the Pier Avenue Junior High School. By 1964 the fad had taken off and skaters emulating surf moves took over the International Surf Festival in Hermosa Beach. 1970's - Beach Volleyball: The first Hermosa Beach volleyball tournament was played in 1970. NBC Sports made its' debut on the beach volleyball scene in 1990, broadcasting the Hermosa Beach AVP (Association of Volleyball Professionals) event. 1980's — Professionalization and Saving the Vetter Windmill: During this period, "Reaganomics" provided what seemed to be an unending supply of high paying aerospace related employment. College graduates from around the United States flocked to the South Bay to enjoy good salaries and year round recreation. Many older dwellings were replaced with larger multi -tenant buildings to accommodate the housing demand. The Vetter Windmill is a nostalgic bit of Hermosa's agricultural past. It once stood on the property of Hermann Vetter (Hermosa's first City Clerk) to provide water for his flower and vegetable gardens (in the area of Sixteenth Street and Ardmore) from the early part of the century until the late 1960s when the site was purchased for development. The Navy Seabees at the request of the City and its Improvement Commission members moved the windmill to its present site in Greenwood Park, the small triangular park on Pacific Coast Highway and Aviation. Document in HISTORICAL SUMMARY 102204 Last printed 12/6/2004 3:17 PM 4 • • ACTION STEPS ACTION STEPS TO BE APPROVED BY FORMAL VOTE OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL A. ESTABLISH THE HERMOSA BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) , COMPOSED OF FIVE MEMBERS TO BE APPOINTED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL, AND HAVING THE FOLLOWING RESPONSIBILITIES: 1) The Hermosa Beach Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) will review all Historic Preservation Applications for Certificate of Appropriateness , all nominations and designations, all rehabilitation incentive applications, and all public outreach projects or public information projects relating to historic preservation. All HPC recommendations for the designation of potential resources shall be forwarded to the City Council for final approval. All other decisions of the HPC are final unless appealed to the City Council, or unless a hearing and decision before the Planning Commission is otherwise required. HPC review shall be completed prior to the review and approval of project permits related to the historical significance of the building's use or appearance. Other duties include: a) Maintaining a City register of cultural resources, historic districts and sites within the city, including all information required for each designation; b) Recommend to the City Council the designation of historic and cultural resources owned by the City, or private resources voluntarily submitted by owners of such resources. c) Periodically update the city register (by reviewing potentially significant historic and cultural resources). d) Preparing prescriptive standards and design guidelines, based upon the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, to be used in reviewing applications for permits to construct, alter, remodel, relocate, enlarge, remove, or demolish any designated historic or cultural resource or structure. e) Issuing Certificates of Appropriateness to alter, construct, remodel, relocate, enlarge, remove, or demolish designated, and Historic Register or survey listed historic and cultural resources. f) When and if authorized to do so, by the City Council , pursue and maintain certified local government status. g) Cooperating with local, county, state, and federal governments in pursuit of historic and cultural resource preservation objectives; ACTION STEPS Page 1 of 3 Last printed 12/27/2004 11:08 AM • • h) Encourage and support efforts within the community to confer recognition upon owners of historic and cultural resources or of property within historic districts, by means of certificates, plaques, or markers. Create an annual Community Recognition Program that publicly recognizes owners of historic properties that have taken steps to apply for and receive Historic Designation status and from time to time, recommending that the City Council issue commendations to owners of cultural resources that have rehabilitated their property in an exemplary manner i) Undertaking any other action or activity necessary or appropriate to the implementation of its duties, or to fulfill the objectives of historic and cultural preservation as authorized by the City Council. j) Encourage a relationship between Historic Preservation and Education by creating a comprehensive education and publicity program that coordinates with local community service organizations and city agencies. k) Coordinate Public Works, Parks and Recreation, Building and Planning Policies and Procedures to ensure implementation of the Preservation Plan and create a consistent vision among all City departments, commissions, agencies, and schools, for the understanding of, and retention of the historic character of Hermosa Beach, and work cooperatively to achieve that vision. 1) Work with City Staff to implement a Preservation Element in the General Plan that includes the following: 1. A design approach that reflects the city's architectural diversity. 2. A commitment to recapturing and maintaining distinctive neighborhood characteristics and preserving the distinctiveness of the city's "downtown" character. 3. Promoting pedestrian friendly environment. 4. Promoting the retention of designated and potentially historically significant buildings and homes on a voluntary basis. 5. The maintaining and/or replicating existing historic street•lighting and historic fixtures where possible; 6. The use and enforcement of the City's General Plan Guidelines for the rehabilitation of historic buildings and new construction that is compatible with existing historic buildings; 7. Encourages the use of existing Ordinances and the development of new ones, for the preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, and adaptive reuse of historically significant designated commercial and residential buildings. ACTION STEPS Page 2 of 3 Last printed 12/28/2004 5:22 PM • • m) If requested to do so, work with the City Council and Staff to review the current Historical Preservation Ordinance 17.53 and recommend changes as needed to insure the voluntary nature of the Preservation Program in Hermosa Beach B. COMMIT TO A HISTORIC RESOURCE IDENTIFICATION SURVEY Conduct a survey of the City which: a) Includes a comprehensive survey to identify and evaluate potentially significant historic and cultural resources. b) Includes the development of a formal historic context statement for the City. c) The City Council officially adopts the results of the Survey as the City's Historic Resources Register. d) Authorizes the City Staff to work jointly with members of the HPC, or if not yet appointed, members of the Select Committee to develop the RFP criteria, select the city qualified bidders, and selection of Proposal to be presented to the City Council for approval e) Requires that this process be completed within 45 days of date of City Council approval of this Survey initiative C. PROMOTE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BY OFFERING INCENTIVES FOR THE VOLUNTARY PRESERVATION AND REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS AND PROMOTE THEM EXTENSIVELY. a) Establish a city process for the implementation of the Mills Act contracts and creates a process that tracks ownership changes for the monitoring of required maintenance of affected properties under the Act. b) Develop and implement a "Change of Use" policy that allow owners to apply to the Planning Commission for a discretionary approval to convert the use of a historic designated properties to a use not normally permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. c) Allow the use of the State Historical Building Code to relieve the owner of a Designated Historic property from certain city code requirements for continued development of the property while maintaining its historic character. d) Implement Permit Fee Waivers that would exempt Designated Historic Property owners from planning fees related to rehabilitation. ACTION STEPS Page 3 of 3 Last printed 12/29/2004 1:25 PM • • SURVEY RESOURCES • • CITY SURVEY The Select Committee believes strongly that an independent city-wide survey is essential for a non controversial, non political, and informed decision making process as to whether a specific property or resource does qualify for designation as a historic landmark or placement on the City Historic Register as being historically significant. There is no current official Historic Register" of existing historically or culturally significant properties in Hermosa Beach, nor has a comprehensive survey known to have been undertaken previously. Without a survey as a guide, an owner may apply for Historic Designation without knowing in advance as to whether it is a historically significant property, and the city council, in the absence of a survey, would find it difficult to properly evaluate such a request. An official survey and resulting establishment of a Historic Register, by a qualified, independent party would result in a list of such qualified properties. Such a list would enable the City to readily identify these properties, contact the owners and proactively offer to provide incentive information and assistance to them in hopes of encouraging preservation. `Currently, the criteria for determining whether a structure qualifies as being historically or culturally significant does exist in the Hermosa Beach Historical Zoning Ordinance, however many structures that might have qualified in the past have already been "demolished" in a historical sense. In an effort to learn more about this process and estimated costs involved, the Committee contacted several recognized historic preservation consultants and noted companies that were recommended by other cities involved in historic preservation. Scope of work as well as estimated costs of options were discussed. If approved by the City Council, such a survey can proceed . Our "Action Steps" requests that the Council authorize the City Staff to work jointly with members of the Select Committee or HPC, if appointed to develop an RFP , meet with potential qualified consultants and evaluate proposals for submittal to the City Council within a 45 day timeframe. It is our belief that an effective and long term Preservation Plan cannot be truly managed without such a Survey. A city-wide survey would become the foundation upon which all preservation programs would be based. CITY SURVEY Last printed 12/27/2004 11:14 AM f Page 1 of 1 • • PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS Note: The following is a list of some local preservation consultants. This list does not constitute a specific recommendation from the City to use or hire anyone on this list. Nor does the order of the consultants on this list reflect any priority or preference. Applicants are welcome to contract with other preservation consultants not on this list. Ultimately, the quality of the work of these consultants will be reviewed at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Preservation Commission and in some cases, the Planning Commission and City Council. Kaplan Chen Kaplan David Kaplan, Architect 2526 Eighteenth Street Santa Monica, CA 90405 (310) 452-7505 Pam O'Connor (310) 458-5500 Janet Ostashay Planning Consultants Research 233 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 130 Santa Monica, CA 90401 (310) 451-4488\ Teresa Grimes Historic Preservation 4211 Glenalbyn Drive Los Angeles, CA 90065 (323) 221-0942 Historic Resources Group 1728 N. Whitley Avenue Hollywood, CA 90028 (323) 469-2349 Lauren Weiss Bricker 1405 Garden Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-3759 Krakower & Associates 160 White Oak Drive Arcadia, CA 91006 (818) 355-6088 Mary Jo Winder Architectural Preservation & Planning Services 331 Fillmore Street Pasadena, CA 91106 (626) 744-6754 04/26/04 1 Myra L. Frank & Associates 811 W. 7th St., Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 627-5376 Chattel 13322 1 Valleyheart Drive South Sherman Oaks, CA 91423-3287 (818) 788-7954 SAIC Leslie Neumann 35 S. Raymond Avenue, Suite 200 Pasadena, CA 91105-1931 (626) 585-0365 Kathy Kondor Chambers Group 17671 Cowan Ave., Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 (949) 261-5414 Anne Browning McIntosh 220 Highland Place Monrovia, CA 91016 (626) 357-9395 Melvyn Green & Associates 21307 Hawthorne Blvd. Suite 250 Torrance, CA 90503 (310) 792-9252 Evan Donahey TBA West 1950 Sacramento Street #1 San Francisco, CA 94109 (415) 567-5786 s:pinliellapreservation'consult list • i Bruce Judd, FAIA Architectural Resources Group Pier 9. The Embarcadero San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 421-1680 John Westermeier Jones & Stokes 17310 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 320 Irvine, California 92614-5600 (949) 260-1080 Margurite Duncan -Abrams Historical Resource Management 544 Prescott Pasadena, CA 91104 Moore Ruble Yudell 933 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 (310) 450-1400 Don Cotton Cotton/Bridges Associates 747 East Green Street Pasadena, California 91101-2119 (626) 304-0102 Robert Selway P.O. Box 4048 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Wilidan Associates 13191 Crossroads Parkway N. #405 Industry, CA 91746 (562) 908-6200 James Wilson Thirtieth Street Architects 2821 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92663 (949) 673-2643 Diane Weir RMW Paleo Associates 23352 Madero, Suite J Mission Viejo, CA 92962 04/26/04 2 s:ph rreservatiorAconsul:list MILLS ACT DETAILS • • MILLS ACT PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT PROGRAM INTRODUCTION The Mills Act is a state sponsored legislation granting local governments the authority to directly participate in an historic preservation program. More importantly, the Mills Act is a self-directed, economic incentive program designed to provide private property owners the opportunity to actively participate in the restoration of their properties while receiving property tax relief. Economic incentives contribute to the preservation of residential neighborhoods and the revitalization of downtown commercial districts. The Mills Act is the single most important economic incentive program available -in California for use by private property owners of qualified historic buildings. Owner -occupied single family residences and income-producing commercial properties may qualify for the Mills Act program. Property owners of historic buildings may qualify for property tax relief if they pledge to rehabilitate and maintain the historical and architectural character of their properties for at least a ten-year period. Mills Act participants may realize a property tax savings of approximately 50% each year for newly improved or purchased older properties. County Assessors are required to calculate the assessed value of the property tax savings for Mills Act properties on the capitalization of income method rather than on market value. The Mills Act is a permissive program subject to approval and adoption by city and county governments. The Mills Act provides local governments the flexibility to design preservation programs to accommodate specific community needs and priorities for rehabilitating entire neighborhoods, encouraging seismic safety programs, contributing to affordable housing, promoting heritage tourism, or fostering pride of ownership. A formal agreement, generally known as a Mills Act contract, is executed between the local government and the property owner for a minimum ten-year term. Contracts are automatically renewed each year and are transferred to new owners when the property is sold. Property owners agree to protect, preserve, and maintain the property in accordance with specific historic preservation standards and conditions identified in the contract. Periodic inspections of the property by city or county officials ensure proper maintenance of the property. Local authorities may impose penalties for breach of contract or failure to protect the historic property. The contract is binding to all owners during the contract period. A qualified historic property is a property listed on any official federal, state, county, or city register, including the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, California Historical Landmarks, State Points of Historical Interest, and local survey listings. MILLS ACT PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT PROGRAM INTRO Last printed 2:02 PM 10/26/2004 Page 1 of 2 • The Office of Historic Preservation maintains a current list of cities and counties that have adopted the Mills Act and copies of successful Mills Act ordinances, resolutions, and contract agreements. MILLS ACT PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT PROGRAM INTRO Last printed 2:02 PM 10/26/2004 Page 2 of 2 7 ! THE MILLS ACT Key Points I DEFINITION A California State law that provides property owners of properly certified buildings deemed 10 have historical significance, a mechanism to reduce property taxes in exchange for a commitment to preserve the property in its historical state. II MECHANISM: The Act allows local governments (city Councils) to negotiate contracts with a term of 10 years with the property owners. TERM: contract automatically renews annually. Bi -lateral agreement: owners must agree to preserve, and if necessary, rehabilitate the historic structure. Flexibility: either property owner or City may initiate termination of the contract at the end of any particular year. III QUALIFICATION: Certification: Property must be "certified" as a local landmark, or reside in a certified local historic district. Inclusion on any official federal, state, county, or local government register required for certification. Both owner -occupied and income property qualify for inclusion. Approved lists may include: Federal - National Register of Historic places State - California Register of Historic places - State Points of Historic Interest Local Government - surveyed or designated properties. Proposal: generally, a local government Historical Preservation Commission is established to facilitate the application process through the local government departments. IV FINANCIAL CALCULATIONS Reference: State of California Revenue and Tax Code - Section 439.21 4 Components: Interest Component - determined by State Board of Equalization. Has ranged from 8% to 10% during recent years: (200-2002.) Historical Property Risk Component - owner occupied: 4%. - other properties: 2%. Amortization Component - varies by individual structure. Generally equal to the reciprocal life of the' improvements, (e.g.: 20 years or 0.05% for a frame building.) Property Taxes Component - State Code defines this as: the "percentage of the estimated tax rate applicable to the property for the assessment year tines the assessment ratio." (Generally, his equates to I% in the post -Prop. 13 environment.) THE MILLS ACT Last printed 10/26/2004 2:0I PM Page 1 of 2 V. IMPLEMENTATION Generally, a local government Commission is involved, with both professional members from applicable trades and citizen members. Duties: The Commission helps with identification of proposed properties, historical designation, review of proposed alterations, maintaining the local registry of historical properties, implementation of applicable ordinances as they relate to certified historical properties The local planning department is the final authority for plan reviews. THE MILLS ACT Last printed 10/26/2004 2:01 PM Page 2 of 2 • • CALIFORNIA STATE CODES RELATING TO MILLS ACT PROGRAM California Government Code, Article 12, Sections 50280-50290 50280. Restriction of Property use. Upon the application of an owner or the agent of an owner of any qualified historical property, as defined in Section 50280.1, the legislative body of a city, county, or city and county may contract with the owner or agent to restrict the use of the property in a manner which the legislative body deems reasonable to carry out the purposes of this article 1.9 (commencing with Section 439) of Chapter 3 of Part 2 of Division 1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The contract shall meet the requirements of Sections 50281 and 50282. 50280.1 Qualified historic property "Qualified historical property" for purposes of this article, means privately owned property which is not exempt from property taxation and which meets either of the following: a) Listed in the National Register of Historic Places of located in a registered historic district, as defined in Section 1.191-2(b) of Title 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations. b) Listed in any state, city, county, or city and county official register of historical or historical or architecturally significant sites, places, or landmarks. 50281. Required contract provision Any contract entered into under this article shall contain the following provisions: a) The term of the contract shall be for a minimum period of 10 years. b) Where applicable, the contract shall provide the following: a. For the preservation of the qualified historical property and, when necessary, to restore and rehabilitate the property to conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the Department of Parks and Recreation, the United States Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the State Historical Building Code. b. For the periodic examinations of the interior and exterior of the premises by the assessor, the Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization as may be necessary to determine the owner's compliance with the contract. c. For it to be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, all successors in the interest of the owner. A successor in interest shall have the same rights and obligations under the contract as the original owner who entered into the contract. d. The owner or agent of an owner shall provide written notice of the contract to the Office of Historic Preservation within six months of entering into the contract. CALIFORNIA STATE CODES RELATING TO MILLS ACT PROGRAM Last printed 10/26/2004 2:03 PM Page 1 of 6 2 • • 50281.1 Fees The legislative body entering into a contract described in this article may require that the property owner, as a condition to entering into the contract, pay a fee not to exceed the reasonable cost of administering this program. 50282. Renewal. a) Each contract shall provide that on the anniversary date of the contract or such other annual date as is specified in the contract, a year shall be added automatically to the initial term of the contract unless notice of nonrenewal is given as provided in this section. If the property owner or the legislative body desires in any year not to renew the contract, that party shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the contract on the other party in advance of the annual renewal date of the contract. Unless the notice is served by the owner at least 90 days prior to the renewal date or by the legislative body at least 60 days prior to the renewal date, one year shall automatically be added to the term of the contract. b) Upon receipt by the owner of a notice from the legislative body of the nonrenewal, the owner may make a written protest of the notice of nonrenewal. The legislative body may, at any time prior to the renewal date, withdraw the notice of nonrenewal. c) If the legislative body or the owner serves notice of intent in any year not to renew the contract, the existing contract shall remain in effect for the balance of the period remaining since the original execution or the last renewal of the contract, as the case may be. d) The owner shall furnish the legislative body with any information the legislative body shall require in order to enable it to determine the eligibility of the property involved. e) No later than 20 days after a city or county enters into a contract with an owner pursuant to this article, the clerk of the legislative body shall record with the county recorder a copy of the contract, which shall describe the property subject thereto. From and after the time of the recordation, this contract shall impart a notice thereof to all persons as is afforded by the recording laws of this state. 50284 Cancellation The legislative body may cancel a contract if it determines that the owner has breached any of the conditions of the contract provided for in this article or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified historical property. The legislative body may also cancel a contract if it determines that the owner has failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in the contract. 50285 Consultation with state commission No contract shall be cancelled under Section 50284 until after the legislative body has given notice of, and has held, a public hearing on the matter. Notice of the hearing shall be mailed to the last known address of CALIFORNIA STATE CODES RELATING TO MILLS ACT PROGRAM Last printed 10/26/2004 2:03 PM Page 2 of 6 2 each owner of property within the historic zone and shall be published pursuant to Section 6061. 50286. Cancellation a) If a contract is cancelled under Section 50284, the owner shall pay a cancellation fee equal to 12 '/� percent of the current fair market value of the property, as determined by the county assessor as though the property were free of the commercial restriction. b) The cancellation fee shall be paid to the county auditor, at the time and in the manner that the county auditor shall prescribe, and shall be allocated by the county auditor to each jurisdiction in the tax rate area in which the property is located in the same manner as the auditor allocates the annual tax increment in that tax rate area in that fiscal year. c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, revenue received by a school district pursuant to this section shall be considered property tax revenue for the purposes of Section 42238 of the Education Code, and revenue received by a county superintendent of schools pursuant to this section shall be considered property tax revenue for the purposes of Article 3 (commencing with Section 2550) of Chapter 12 of Part 2 of Division 1 of Totle 1 of the Education Code. 50287. Action to enforce contract. As an alternative to cancellation of the contract for breach of any condition, the county, city, or any landowner may bring any action in court necessary to enforce a contract including, but not limited to , an action to enforce the contract by specific performance or injunction. 50288. Eminent Domain. In the event that property subject to contract under this article is acquired in whole or in part by eminent domain or other acquisition by any entity authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain, and the acquisition is determined by the legislative body to frustrate the purpose of the contract, such contract shall be canceled and no fee shall be imposed under Section 50286. Such contract shall be deemed null and void for all purposes of determining the value of the property so acquired. 50289 Annexation by city In the event that property restricted by a contract with a county under this article is annexed to a city, the city shall succeed to all rights, duties, and powers of the county under such contract. 50290 Consultation with state commission. Local agencies and owners of qualified historical properties may consult with the State Historical Resources Commission for its advice and counsel on matters relevant to historical property contracts. CALIFORNIA STATE CODES RELATING TO MILLS ACT PROGRAM Last printed 10/26/2004 2:03 PM Page 3 of 6 2 • • California Revenue and Taxation Code, Article 1.9, Sections 439-439.4 439. Historical Property Restrictions: enforceably restricted property. For the purposes of this article and within the meaning of Section 8 of Article XIII of the Constitution, property is "enforceably restricted" if it is subject to an historical property contract executed pursuant to Article 12 (commencing with Section 50280) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division of Title 5 of the Government Code. 439.1 Historical Property: definitions. For purposes of this article "restricted historical property" means qualified historical property, as defined in Section 50280.1 of the Government Code, that is subject to a historical property contract executed pursuant to Article 12 (commencing with Section 50280) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Code. For purposes of this section, "qualified historical property" includes qualified historical - improvements and any land on which the qualified historical improvements are situated, as specified in the historical property contract. If the historical property contract does not specify the land that is to be included, "qualified historical property" includes only that area of reasonable size that is used as a site for historical improvements. 439.2 Historical Property; valuation. When valuing enforceably restricted historical property, the county assessor shall not consider sales data on similar property, whether or not enforceably restricted, and shall value that restricted historical property by the capitalization of income method in the following manner: a) The annual income to be capitalized shall be determined as follows: 1) Where sufficient rental information is available, the income shall be the fair rent that can be imputed to the restricted historical property being valued based upon rent actually received for the property by the owner and upon typical rentals received in the area for similar property in similar use where the owner pays the property tax. When the .restricted historical property being valued is actually encumbered by a lease, any cash rent or its equivalent considered in determining the fair rent of the property shall be the amount for which the property would be expected to rent were the rental payment to be negotiated in the light of current conditions, including applicable provisions under which the property is enforceably restricted. 2) Where sufficient rental information is not available, the income shall be that which the restricted historical property being valued reasonably can be expected to yield under prudent management and subject to applicable provisions under which the property is enforceably restricted. 3) If the parties to an instrument that enforceably restricts the property stipulate therin an amount that constitutes the minimum annual income to be capitalized, then the income to be capitalized shall not be less than the amount so stipulated. For purposes of this section, income shall be determined in accordance with the rules and regulations issued by the board and with this section and shall be the difference between revenue and expenditures. Revenue shall be the amount of money ormoney's worth, including casjh rent or its equivalent, that the property can be expected to yield to an owner -operator annually on the average from any use of the property permitted under the terms by which CALIFORNIA STATE CODES RELATING TO MILLS ACT PROGRAM Last printed 10/26/2004 2:03 PM Page 4 of 6 the property is enforceably restricted. Expenditures shall be any outlay or average annual allocation of money or money's worth that can be fairly charged against the revenue expected to be received during the period used in computing the revenue. Those expenditures to be charged against revenue shall be only those which are ordinary and necessary in the production and maintenance of the revenue for that period. Expenditures shall not include depletion charges, debt retirement, interest on funds invested in the property, property taxes, corporation income taxes, or corporation franchise taxes based on income. b) The capitalization rate to be used in valuing owner -occupied single family dwellings pursuant to this article shall not be derived from the sales data and shall be the sum of the following components: 1) An interest component to be determined by the board and announced no later than September 1 of the year preceding the assessment year and that was the yield rate equal to the effective rate on conventional mortgages as determined by the Federal Housing Finance Board, rounded to the nearest 1/4 percent. 2) A historical property rick component of 4 percent. 3) A component for property taxes that shall be a percentage equal to the estimated total tax rate rate applicable to the property for the assessment year times the assessment ratio. 4) A component for the amortization of the improvements that shall be a percentage equivalent to the reciprocal of the remaining life. c) The capitalization rate to be used in valuing all other restricted historical property pursuant to this article shall not be derived fro the sales data and shall be the sum of the following components: 1) An interest component to be determined by the board and announced no later than September 1 of the year preceding the assessment year and that was the yield rate equal to the effective rate on conventional mortgages as determined by the Federak Housibgf Finance Board, rounded to the nearest '/4 percent. 2) A historical property risk component of 2 percent. 3) A component for property taxes that shall be a percentage equal to the estimated total tax rate applicable to the property for the assessment year times the assessment ratio. 4) A component for the amortization of the improvements that shall be a percentage equivalent to the reciprocal of the remaining life. d) Unless a party to an instrument that creates an enforceable restriction expressly prohibits the valuation, the valuation resulting from the capitalization of income method described in this section shall not exceed the lesser of either the valuation that would have resulted by calculation under Section 110, or the valuation that would have resulted by calculation under Section 110.1, as though the property was not subject to an enforceable restriction in the base year. e) The value of the restricted historical property shall be the quotient of the income determined as provided in subdivision (a) divided by the capitalization rate determined as provided in subdivision (b) or (c). f) The ratio prescribed in Section 401 shall be applied to the value of the property determined in subdivision (d) to obtain its assessed value. 439.3. Historical Property; notice of nonrenewal. CALIFORNIA STATE CODES RELATING TO MILLS ACT PROGRAM Last printedl0/26/2004 2:03 PM Page 5 of 6 • • Notwithstanding any provision of Section 439.2 to the contrary, if either the county or city or the owner of restricted historical property subject to contract has served notice of nonrenewal as provided in Section 50282 of the Government Code, the county assessor shall value that restricted historical property as provided in this section. (a) Following the hearing conducted pursuant to, Section 50285 of the Government Code, subdivision (b) shall apply until the termination of the period for which the restricted historical property is enforceably restricted. (b) The board or assessor in each year until the termination of the period for which the property is enforceably restricted shall do all of the following: (1) Determine the full cash value of the property pursuant to Section 110.1 If the property is not subject to Section 110.1 when the restriction expires, the value shall be determined pursuant to Section 110 as if the property were free of contractural restriction. If the property will be subject to a use for which this chapter provides a special restricted assessment, the value of the property shall be determined as if it were subject to the new restriction. (2) Determine the value of the property by the capitalization of the income method as provided in Section 439.2 and without regard to the fact that a notice of nonrenewal or cancellation has occurred. (3) Subtract the value determined in paragraph (2) of this subdivision by capitalization of income from full cash value determined in paragraph (1). (4) Using the rate announced by the board pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 439.2, discount the amount obtained in paragraph (3) for the number of years remaining until the termination of the period for which the property is enforceably restricted. (5) Determine the value of the property by adding the value determined by the capitalization of income method as provided in paragraph (2) and value obtained in paragraph (4). (6) Apply the ratios prescribed in Section 401 to the value of the property determined in paragraph (5) to obtain its assessed value. 439.4. Historical Property; recordation. No property shall be valued pursuant to this article unless an enforceable restriction meeting the requirements of Section 439 is signed, accepted and recorded on or before the lien date for the fiscal year in which th evaluation would apply. CALIFORNIA STATE CODES RELATING TO MILLS ACT PROGRAM Last printedl0/26/2004 2:03 PM Page 6 of 6 • • INCENTIVES • • REHABILITATION INCENTIVES A. PURPOSE: The rehabilitation incentives provided by this section are intended to encourage the maintenance, preservation, and rehabilitation of cultural resources in the city, based on a recognition that maintaining and rehabilitating a cultural resource places increased burdens on the property owner of the resource. B. APPLICABILITY. Upon designation of a structure or improvement as a designated cultural resource, the property owner of the designated cultural resource, the property owner of the designated resource may apply to the HPC for aid and assistance in rehabilitating the designated resource. C. TYPES OF INCENTIVES ALLOWED. Rehabilitation incentives that may be granted by the city include: -Permit fee waivers: -Change of use -Mills Act Agreements: -Reductions in the development standards of the Zoning Ordinance: -Permitting of uses not allowed in the zone, but which are permitted in other zones D. APPLICATION CONTENT: Application shall include the following information: 1) The property owner's name; 2) The address of the cultural resource; 3) The structure of improvement designated; 4) A description of the specific rehabilitation incentive being requested; 5) Detailed, scaled drawings depicting the proposed project; 6) A plan for restoration or maintenance plan from a preservation architect who is acceptable to the city; 7) An estimate of the cost of restoration or maintenance plan from a preservation architect who is acceptable to the city; Rehabilitation Incentives -Final Last printed 10/26/2004 2:07 PM Page 1 of 3 IP • 8) • A list of any funds granted by any agency, public or private, for the purpose of restoration; 9) A statement regarding the availability of tax credits; 10) A written statement complete with a full set of architectural drawings (where appropriate) which clearly outline and depict the proposal by the applicant for rehabilitation incentives; 11) Other information deemed necessary by the HPC and City E. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF REHABILITATION INCENTIVES 1) HPC Hearing and Action. If required by the City Council, the HPC will develop a public hearing process and shall, by resolution, approve or deny any application for use of Historical Rehabilitation incentives. 2) Planning Commission Review and Action. For rehabilitation incentives which involve adaptive reuse and where the proposed use would typically require Commission approval, the Planning Commission shall be the approving authority. However the Commission's decision shall consider the recommendation of the HPC regarding the request. 3) Appeals. Appeals of the HPC final decisions shall be heard by the City Council, subject to the notice and hearing requirements of Chapter (xxxx). The appeal shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk within ten days following the date of the HPC's public action. Noticing for Mills Act request shall only require a ten-day notification to the owner of the property. The Council has final approving authority in Mills Act decisions. 4) Investigations. The HPC has the authority to request the applicant for rehabilitation incentives to furnish any material deemed necessary for properly granting a rehabilitation incentive. 5) Findings for Rehabilitation Incentives. The HPC may recommend approval of applications for use of Historical Preservation Incentives, only if all of the following findings of fact are made in a positive manner; a. Generally, 1. The incentive(s) to be granted serve(s) to compensate the property owner for the increased burden, in terms of maintenance and expense, that rehabilitation would entail; 2. The proposed incentive(s) would not impair the aesthetic, architectural, or historic integrity of the resource; Rehabilitation Incentives -Final Last printed 10/26/2004 2:07 PM Page 2 of 3 • • 3. The proposed incentive(s) would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare. b. Change of Use or Adaptive Reuse. In addition to the findings identified in (E)(5)(a.), above, the Commission shall make the following findings for an application for a change of use or adaptive reuse; 1. The change of use/adaptive reuse would occupy no more than the original square footage of the resource; 2. The proposed change of the use or adaptive reuse would not significantly impair the integrity or character of the neighborhood in which it is located; 3. The change of use or adaptive reuse would result in substantial restoration of the significant and architectural features or exterior architectural appearance of the resource or shall result in a maintenance plan for the building which will ensure the upkeep and continued maintenance of the resource over the expected life of the project. 4. In the case of a request for the reuse of a structure that has historically been residential, for a commercial use (e.g. a Bed and Breakfast Inn), the applicant has proven that an economic hardship exists such that the proposed commercial use is necessary to maintain the building. F. PERMIT FEE WAIVERS. Pending approval of the City Council , all planning fees shall be deferred, and shall be waived upon approval of the rehabilitation incentives, provided that public noticing fees shall not be waived. Rehabilitation Incentives -Final Last printed 10/26/2004 2:07 PM Page 3 of 3 • GLOSSARY • GLOSSARY Adaptive Reuse—The process of converting a building to a use other that that for which it was designed. Such a conversion may be accomplished with varying alterations to the building. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)----A state law enacted in 1971, which requires governmental agencies at all levels to consider the impact proposed projects have on the environment, including cultural and historic significance. The lead decision- making agency is responsible for determining whether a significant adverse impact may occur and whether it can be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Where evidence indicates that a significant adverse effect may occur, the lead agency is required to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) which discusses in detail the potential impact and feasible means of avoiding or reducing it. California Preservation Foundation (CPF)----A non-profit education foundation which promotes historic preservation in California. CPF sponsors workshops, holds an annual conference, and issues a quarterly newsletter. The organization is headquartered in Oakland, California. California Register of Historic Resources ----An authoritative guide to the state's significant historical and archaelogical resources. The Register was designed for use by the state and local agencies, private organizations, and citizens, to identify, evaluate, register, and protect California's significant resources. The program encourages public recognition and protection of resources of architectural, historical, archaeological, or cultural significance; identifies historical resources for state and local planning purposes; determines eligibility for state historic preservation grant funding; and affords certain protection under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As of 2004, Hermosa Beach has properties on the California Register. Certificate of Appropriateness ----A permit to proceed with new construction or alterations to a designated historic property after the proposed changes have been reviewed by the Preservation Commission. Certified Local Government (CLG)----Approval of the local historic preservation program by the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Secretary of the Interior. To be certified, a local government program must enforce appropriate state and local preservation legislation, establish and maintain a qualified historic preservation review commission, provide for adequate public participation in its activities, and maintain a system for the survey and inventory of historic properties. Is Hermosa beach a certified local government???? Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program ----A Federal assistance program authorized by Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. The funds are typically used for public works projects, economic development activities, and for the rehabilitation programs for lower income neighborhoods. However, historic GLOSSARY Last printed 10/26/2004 2:13 PM Page 1 of 5 • • preservation is a "eligible activity" under the program, and funds can be also used to rehabilitate, preserve, and restore historic properties. The CDBG program can also be used to conduct special planning studies and for special projects including conferences, seminars, and publications which address the preservation of historic buildings. Design Guidelines ----Criteria, locally developed, which identify local design concerns, drawn up in an effort to assist property owners to respect and maintain the character of the designated district of buildings in the process of rehabilitation and new construction. Historic Context Statement ----A narrative description of the broad patterns of historical development in a community or its region that is represented by historic resources. A historic context statement is organized by themes such as economic, residential, and institutional development. Historic District ----A geographically definable area possessing a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of sites, buildings, structures or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development. Historic House Museum ----A public or private educational institution, usually nonprofit, whose structure is itself of historical or architectural importance and whose interpretation relates primarily to the building's architecture, furnishing, and history. Historic Overlay Zone ----A special zoning district created over an existing zoning district which imposes design and land use guidelines designed to prevent the demolition or destruction of historic properties. Historic Resource ----Any improvement, building, structure, landscape, sign,features, site, place, or area of scientific, aesthetic, educational, cultural, architectural, or historic significance to the citizens of Hermosa Beach . Historic Resources Inventory ----The organized compilation of information on those properties evaluated as significant according to a historic resources survey. Historic Resources Survey ----A process if identifying and gathering data on a community's historic resources (including buildings, sites, structures, and districts) deserving recognition in order to provide a basis for possible official designation and help establish preservation goals and objectives. A survey includes field work -the physical search for and recording of historic resources on the ground -as well as research, organization, and presentation of the survey data. Intensive -Level Survey—Documents all historic buildings, structures, sites, and objects in sufficient details to permit their evaluation and eligibility for listing in the National Register or a state or local equivalent. Reconnaissance -Level Survey—Provides a general picture of the distribution of different types and styles of buildings and of the character GLOSSARY Last printed 10/26/2004 2:13 PM Page 2 of 5 i • of different neighborhoods. Information on individual properties is kept brief. Surveyors drive the streets and roads of a community and make notes on the buildings, structures, and landscapes characteristics as well as the general character of the area. Infill ----Descriptive of buildings that have been designed and built to replace missing buildings or otherwise fill gaps in the streetscape. Preservationists are concerned that the design of infill architecture be compatible in such elements as style, height, proportion, and materials. Interpretation ----The education methods by which history and meaning of historic sites, buildings, objects, districts, and structures are explained by use of docents, leaflets, tape recordings, signs, films, and other means. Local Landmark ----Buildings, structures, sites, districts, and objects officially determined historically significant and designated so according the Ordinance Memorandum of Understanding ----A binding agreement between the National Advisory Council for Historic Preservation, the State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO), the Certified Local Government, and the lead Federal agency initiating a project, on how cultural resources within the area affected by a project will be identified and evaluated, and how potential adverse effects of the project will be mitigated. An MOU gives the certified local government the authority to conduct Section 106 review contingent upon the conditions agreed upon with the National Advisory Council and SHPO. Mills Act ----Created by California state legislation in 1976, the Mills Act allows cities to enter into contract with owners of historic buildings to provide a method of reducing property taxes in exchange for the continued preservation of the property. Property taxes recalculated using the Mills Act assessment may be reduced by 50 percent or more. National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)----The four aspects of American history used to evaluate significance and eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places. They are: association with historic events or activities, association with important persons, distinctive design or physical characteristics or, potential to provide important information about prehistory or history. A property must meet at least one of the criteria for listing. National Register of Historic Places ----The official Federal list of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture. National Register properties have significance to the prehistory and history of their community, State, or the Nation. The register is administered by the National Park Service. Properties listed in the National Register possess significance and integrity. Significance is assessed according to the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Generally properties must be fifty years of age or more to be considered for the National Register. GLOSSARY Last printed 10/26/2004 2:13 PM Page 3 of 5 • • Neighborhood Conservation Area (NCA) ----A geographic area of the city, which can be commercial or residential, with a high concentration of historic resources. An NCA merits special consideration in the local planning process and may be under consideration for designation as a historic district. Neighborhood Conservation Area (NCA) ----A geographic area of the, city, which can be commercial or residential, with a high concentration of historic resources. An NCA merits special consideration in a local planning process and may be under consideration for designation as a historic district. Preservation Commission ----A generic term applied to a municipal agency with the basic responsibility of designating and regulating historic landmarks and districts. Rehabilitation ----The act or process of returning a property to a state of utility through repair or alteration which makes possible as efficient contemporary use while preserving those portions or features of the property which are significant to its historical, architectural, and cultural values. Restoration ----The act or process of of accurately recovering the form and details of a property and its setting as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the .removal of later work or by the replacement of missing earlier work. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation ----Standards developed by the Secretary of the Interior to assist the long-term preservation of a property's significance through the preservation of historic materials and features. The Standards pertain to historic buildings of all materials, construction types, sizes, and occupancy and encompass the exterior and interior of the buildings as well as related landscape features and the building's site environment. Many state and local municipalities use the Standards for reviewing preservation projects. The Standards are also used by the State Office of Historic Preservation in determining weather a rehabilition qualified as a "certified rehabilitation" for federal tax purposes. Section 106 ----Enacted as part of the National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106 is the Federal review process designed to ensure that historic properties are considered during federal project planning and execution. The process is administered by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, an independent federal agency responsible for advising the President and Congress on historic preservation issues. Federal activities or undertakings that are regulated by Section 106 may include construction of buildings, rehabilitation and repair projects, demolition, licenses, permits, local, grants, and federal property transfers. Properties subject to Section 106 review are eligible for or listed in the National Register of Historic Places. State Historical Building Code (SHBC)----Designed ti protect the state's architectural heritage by recognizing the unique construction problems inherent in historic buildings, and provide alternative building regulations for the rehabilitation, preservation, GLOSSARY Last printed 10/26/2004 2:13 PM Page 4 of 5 • restoration, or relocation of designated historic buildings. SHBC regulations are intended to facilitate restoration or accommodate change of occupancy while preserving a historic building's original architectural elements and features. The code also addresses occupant safety, encourages energy conservation, provides .a cost-effective approach to preservation, and facilitates accessibility issues. State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) ----Responsible for administering preservation programs set up by federal and state law. Each state has such an office, established by the National Historical Preservation Act of 1966, and headed by the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), who is appointedby the governor. California is also served by the State Historical Resourcees Commission (SHRC), a citizens group which is also appointed by the governor. GLOSSARY Last printed 10/26/2004 2:13 PM Page 5 of 5 • • ADDENDUM SECTION • • CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was enacted in 1970 for the purpose of informing decision makers and the public of the potential significant environmental impacts of proposed projects. CEQA's definition of the environment includes the historic built environment. CEQA requires that environmental protection be given significant consideration in the decision-making process. This California statute applies to all governmental agencies that initiate a project including local, regional, and state agencies; and it also applies to agency actions, including the approval or issuance of zoning permits, or any project which requires a discretionary pernlit. When the California Register of Historical Resources was established in 1992, the legislature also amended CEQA to clarify which cultural resources are significant, as well as which project impacts are considered to be significantly adverse. A "substantial adverse change" means "demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired." CEQA defines an historical resource as a resource listed in or determined eligible for listing, in the California Register of Historical Resources. All properties on the California Register are to be considered under CEQA. However, because a property does not appear on the California Register does not mean it is not significant and therefore exempt from CEQA consideration. Similar to Section 106 , and the National Register, all resources determined eligible for the California Register are also to be considered under CEQA. Other resources are subject to a rebuttable presumption of historical significance. These include locally designated properties and properties evaluated as significant in cultural resource surveys which meet California Register of Historical Resources criteria and California Office of Historic Preservation Survey Methodology. Generally, the implementation of CEQA entails three separate phases. The first phase consist of preliminary review of a project to determine whether it is a "project" under and therefore subject to CEQA. The second phase involves preparation of an Initial Study to determine whether the project may have a significant environmental effect. The third phase is preparation of an EIR if the project may have a significant environmental effect or the determination of a Negative Declaration if no significant effects will occur. CEQA does not apply to ministerial actions which may impact a cultural resource, but does apply to projects which involve discretionary actions. Most actions (in West Hollywood) are discretionary. An example of a ministerial action is a minimum interior remodel of a cultural resource. Substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource is viewed as a significant effect on the environment . CEQA prohibits the use of a categorical exemption for projects which may cause a substantial adverse change which is defined as CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Last printed 10/26/2004 2:18 PM Page 1 of 2 • • demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration activities which would negatively impact the significance and integrity of a cultural resource. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Last printed 10/26/2004 2:18 PM Page 2 of 2 r • • Section 106 Review Section 106 of the national Historic Preservation Act requires that every Federal Agency "take into account" how each of its undertakings could affect cultural resources. Section 106 refers to the Federal review process designed to ensure that cultural resources are considered during Federal project planning and execution. For purposes of Section 106 Review, cultural resources are those listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The review process is administered by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, an independent Federal agency. Section 106 Review Page 1 of 1 Last printed 10/26/2004 2:22 PM • LIST OF CALIFORNIA CITIES HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANS THAT WE HAVE COPIES OF AND USED AS RESOURCES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HERMOSA BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN City of La Verne City of Long Beach City of Los Angeles City of Monrovia City of Orange City of Redondo Beach City of San Clemente City of San Diego City of Sierra Madre City of Pasadena City of West Hollywood (also have Preservation Element to General Plan) Historic Preservation Plans List Page 1 of 1 Last printed 12/27/2004 11:33 AM F ecember 11, 2004 I asked the City Clerk for the invoices of the six or seven electric hookups the City Counsel said cost under $800.00. The City Clerk said she checked with the City Manager and he said the check register is the best place to get the costs. The City Clerk furnished me with a copy of the check register. The copy furnished has four hookups @ under $800.00. The copy furnished has six listed at: 1 $ 1,001.18 2 $ 1,850.00 3 $ 1,980.00 4 $ 2,025.00 5 $ 2,070.00 6 $ 2,745.00 If the statement by the City Counsel that the cost for the hookups were under $800.00, and the costs of six hookups were between $1,000.00 and almost $3,000.00, there may appear to be credit to the statement that the City Council membership could go to work for John Deer pushing one of those manure spreaders all day and not be bothered by doing so. Creighton la expdetl.rpt 12/01/2004 2:30PM Expenditure Detail Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/01/2000 through 06/30/2001 Page: 1 140 Community Dev Block Grant Account Number 4700 Community Dev Bik Grant 4706 Utility Underground Assistance 4706-4200 Contract Services 4706-4201 Contract Service/Privat 12/31/2000 budgetadj BA MYBGT0001-7 UTILITY UNDRGRND AID/CC 8-8-00 • 3/31/2001 aje GJ AJ0301-29 UNDRGRND ASST MGMT FEE/JAN-MAR 3/31/2001 aje GJ AJ0301-29 UNDRGRND ASST MGMT FEE/JAN-MAR 5/3/2001 invoice IN 040201 CITY PLANNER/MARCH 2001 Vendor. 10677 LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES 5/3/2001 invoice IN 040201 CITY PLANNER/MARCH 2001 Vendor. 10677 LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES 6/6/2001 Invoice IN 3741 INSTALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES Vendor. 10912 SUN -ELECTRIC COMPANY 6/13/2001 Invoice IN 3926 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES CONNECT Vendor. 10950 CHRISTMAS ELECTRIC 6/21/2001 Invoice IN 55018 UNDERGOUNDING ASSIST/818 LOMA Vendor. 10962 BORGSTROM, TERESE • 6/26/2001 Invoice IN 719 UNDERGROUND ASSISTANCE/LOMA DR Vendor. 10978 FORTUNATO ELECTRIC INC. 6/30/2001 invoice IN 3081 UNDERGROUND CONNECT/2309 MANNA Vendor. 10912 SUN ELECTRIC COMPANY 6/30/2001 Invoice IN 4037 UTIL UNDRGRND AID/814 MONTEREY Vendor. 10912 SUN ELECTRIC COMPANY Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 UTILITY UNDRGRND AID/CC 8-8-00 1,734.00 UNDRGRND ASST MGMT FEE/JAN-MAR 1,734.00 UNDRGRND ASST MGMT FEE/JAN-MAR 3,440.00 CITY PLANNER/MARCH 2001 Check # 25082 -1,840.00 CITY PLANNER/MARCH 2001 Check # 25082 2,025.00 INSTALL.UNDERGROUND UTILITIES Check # 25494 1,850.00 Ys UNDERGROUND UTILITIES CONNECT Check # 25518 1,980 00 , 3 UNDERGOUNDING ASSIST/818 LOMA Check # 25576 711.00 UNDERGROUND ASSISTANCE/LOMA DR Check # 25666 225.00 rte" UNDERGROUND CONNECT/2309 MANNA Check # 25749 2,745.00 41,1 UTIL UNDRGRND AID/814 MONTEREY Check # 26115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0C Page: expdetl.rpt 12/01/2004 2:30PM . Expenditure Detail Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/01/2000 through 06/30/2001 Page: 2 140 Community Dev Block Grant Account Number 4706-4201 Contract Service/Privat 6/30/2001 invoice IN 741 RETENTION/1040 LOMA DRIVE Vendor. 10978 FORTUNATO ELECTRIC INC. 6/30/2001 aje GJ YE01-12 TRSFR INELIGIBLE EXP FRM CDBG 6/30/2001 aje GJ YE01-12 • 6/30/2001 TRSFRaje INELIGIBLE EXP FRM CDBG GJ YE01-23A JOHN YOUNG ELEC/818 LOMA DR 6/30/2001 " aje GJ YE01-23A SUN ELEC/814 MONTEREY 4706-4201 Contract Service/Privat Total Community Dev Block Grant • Grand Total Adjusted Appropriation (Continued) Year-to-date Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances 79.00 RETENTION/1040 LOMA DRIVE Check # 26248 -3,468.00 TRSFR INELIGIBLE EXP FRM CDBG -1,600.00 TRSFR INELIGIBLE EXP FRM CDBG 220.00 JOHN YOUNG ELEC/818 LOMA DR 305.00 SUN ELEC/814 MONTEREY 25,000.00 10,140.00 25,000.00 10,140.00 25,000.00 10,140.00 10,140.00 10,140.00 10,140.00 0.00 0.00 Prct Balance Used 14,860.00 40.56 14.860.00 40.56 0.00 14,860.00 40.56 Page: 2 expdetl.rpt 12/01/2004 2:18PM Expenditure Detail Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/01/2001 through 06130/2002 Page: 4 140 Community Dev Block Grant 4706 Utility Underground Assistance Account Number 4706-4201 Contract Service/Privat 12/13/2001 invoice IN 4101-11498 UNDERGROUND UTILITY ASSISTANCE vendor. 10942 BEAR ELECTRIC 4/8/2002 Invoice IN 20727 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES Vendor. 09759 BROOKES ELECTRIC COMPANY • 6/30/2002 invoice IN 4201-12687 UNDERGROUND/744 SUNSET DRIVE Vendor. 10942 BEAR ELECTRIC 6/30/2002 invoice IN 20843 UNDERGROUNDING GRANT/1016 LOMA Vendor. 09759 BROOKES ELECTRIC COMPANY 6/30/2002 invoice IN 4201-12687 UNDERGROUND/745 LOMA DR. Vendor: 10942 BEAR ELECTRIC 6/30/2002 budgetadj BA YEBGT02-2 UNDERGRND ASSIST SAUBEN 6/30/2002 budgetadj BA YEBGT02-2 UNDERGRND ASSIST SAUBEN 6/30/2002 budgetadj BA YEBGT02-2 UNDERGRND ASSIST SAUBEN 4706-4201 Contract Service/Privat Total Contract Services Total Utility Underground Assistance • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used (Continued) 2,700.00 UNDERGROUND UTILITY ASSISTANCE Check # 27522 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES Check # 28744 1,001.18 200.00 --�� UNDERGROUND/744 SUNSET DRIVE Check # 30019 111.24 UNDERGROUNDING GRANT/1016 LOMA Check # 30087 100.00 UNDERGROUND/745 LOMA DR. Check # 30019 -29.00 UNDERGRND ASSIST SAUBEN -57.00 UNDERGRND ASSIST SAUBEN -311.00 UNDERGRND ASSIST SAUBEN 8,603.00 4,112.42 8,603.00 4,112.42 9,000.00 4,508.45 4,112.42 4,112.42 4,508.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,490.58 4,490.58 4,491.55 47.80 47.80 50.09 Page: 4 41V r4,444v6 .A.0 ez-7-nAkiktzlect" City Counsel Agenda: I was sad to have the City Attorney state the city was not enforcing the law; however, I was greatly relieved by his stating the law was going to be amended so as to make the law clear. It appears that some people have gotten four friends together and donated $1,000.00 for "cheap insurance". The states electorate voted to allow labor unions, associations, and other worker organizations to exceed the cities $249.00 limit. Is it correct that a county committee is not controlled by the cities ordinance 2.08.020? If labor unions like mine the I.U.O.E, or four people giving a $1,000.00, or county committees are not held to a $249.00, limit, why limit the voters of Hermosa Beach to such controls when you cannot control people outside the City of Hermosa Beach? lb Vd/LU'U4 i!iu;. IU:JV r:i.1. J1U .iii: U1JV CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 VALLEY DRIVE A 9025 4 HERMCSA;,BEACH, C Phone:1-31.0-318-0204 Fax: 1-310-372 6186 Fax To: , I S�, Date: Fax: a :.t Phone: Pages: 1 0 please Recycle __----- El Urgent 0 For Review ❑Please Comment 0 Please Reply From: City Clerk's Office aa, Og- March 29, 2004 Roger — This Is the answer I received from City Attorney MIKe Jenk ns in an email to ire this morning, 3/29/04. Jackie Drasco Deputy City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach "I think the best you can say to Creighhe last ton is that wdid not the info ce the $249 nance is not anus to , that we intend to amend it, but that during u pdent committees: contributions to Independent Below is the code section from the Municipai Code which applies to Campaign contribution limitations: 2.08. 020 Campaign contribution limitations. ledge or No person shall make, nor shalt any �disubscr�ptr �on�loan aive office dvance,sp r her procommittee, f accept any contribution, gift, promise of money in aid of the nomination or election of a candidate wh�hofl'ill orcause such person with respect to a single election in suppot of,su r+ the total given by ' • . .. ributions to -li nine do ars opposite to, such candidate, indeed the sum o o undred forty-nine , , a candidate to his own 49.00). This sec ion shall not apply to amounts given by campaign. (Prior code § 10.5-17) • Richard McCurd • Page 1 of l From: "Ron Newman" <ron@sharkeez.net> To: "Sam Edgerton" <Samedgerton@aol.com> Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 11:33 AM Subject: Fw: supporters to re- elect sam Original Message From: Ron Newman To: Ron Newman Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 5:42 AM Subject: supporters to re- elect sam "Join Sams club" Support and endorse Sam! "What you don't know might hurt you! It took us a lot of work to get Sam to run again. We promised him support and money for his campaign I have talked to many of you, about how much you have spent in legal expenses dealing with the city. The cost of legal expenses, time delays, plan checks remodels, construction, code enforcements and other government regulations. Their are so many behind the scenes problems that would impact your businesses and your homes that are solved without you knowing about them. Sam and art voting against the new bike path that will cost us hundreds of thousands of dollars and ruin the beauty of Hermosa beach, he voted against the hotel tax and business license tax to name a few. Their are a few involved people who spend a lot of time and money _looking oz!! for all of our interests. Without a1;y cos; to us. Sam helped build a stronger local economy, by voting for Mervyns beach bash, the fiestas, aloha days, volleyball, new years eve, st Patrick day and many other projects to encourage people to spend money in Hermosa beach. He supports the interest of business to government, His door is always open, sam will remember his supporters and help them if it is within the law and the good of all concerned. "Now its your time to show your appreciation? We need money! Have you ever heard the slogan, givers gain, without expecting anything in return, you can be a giver, Sam has been a giver, for eight years now, it is our turn to show our appreciation. please make out checks for $249.00 committee to re-elect Sam Edgerton for city council. We will also accept checks for $50.00 or $100.00, I know some e who have gpsenpur friend and donated _ $1,000.00, "cheap insurance? Having e rig person representing you on city council. We Need money now! No mananas. call me at 310 4209117. I will send someone down to pick up your check and I will give it to Sam personally. Their is going to be a debate at Sangria Friday oct 10th at 11:00 mark your calendar. Bring customers ,friend and employees to show support, also ask them if we can put a sign in their yard. we are also doing a absentee ballot campaign to sign up young voters. Greg and Mike from sangria are heading this up. Sam has a great campaign committee that is spending a lot of time to get him Re-elected come join us be with a winner. please check out his new web site getsamedgerton. com, the site will be up and running next week. Yours truly Ron Newman. P.S the other candidate to give support too is Pete tucker. 1/2/2004 Schedule A Monetary Contributions Pe.. eivGd SCHEDULE A Stect_ ..t cc crs i„G w tram 01/01/2003 � " io�F� Monetary Contributions Summary 1. Amount received this period - contributions of $100 or more. (Include all Schedule A subtotals.) 2. Amount received this period - contributions of less than $100 (Do not itemize.) $ 24 8 00 3. Total monetary contributions received this period. (Add Lines 1 and 2. Enter here and on the Stunmary Page, Column A, Line 1.) TOTAL $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 5,000.00 5,248.00 through 12/31/2003 Page 4 10• NAME OF FILER Citizens for A Better Hermosa Beach LD,NUMBER 1259783 DATE RECEIVED FULL NAME, STREET ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE OF CONTRIBUTOR (IF COMMITTEE, ALSO ENTER I.D. NUMBER) CONTRIBUTOR CODE • IF AN INDIVIDUAL, ENTER OCCUPATION AND EMPLOYER (IF SELF.EMFLOYEO ENTER NAME OF BUSINESS) AMOUNT RECEIVED THIS PERIOD CUMULATIVE CALENDAR (JAN 1 - DEC TO DATE YEAR 91) PER ELECTION TO DATE (IF REOUIRED) 11/03/2003 Bayview Properties 2541 Hermosa Ave. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 0 IND 500.00 500.00 ■ COM :"3 OTH • PTY ■ SCC 10/28/2003 10/30/2003 Roger Dane Creighton• 1070 3rd Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-5343 ^3 IND Unemployed Bulldozer Operator None 1,000.00 500.00 1,500.00 ❑ CoM ■ OTH ■ PTY ■ scc 11/03/2003 William Ruane 402 Main Street. El Segundo, CA 90245 ® IND Realtor Remax 1,500.00 1,500.00 ■ COM ■ OTH • PTY ■ scc 11/03/2003 The Deretin Group 9800 S. Sepulveda Blvd. Suite 720 Los Angeles, CA 90045 0 IND 1,500.00 1,500.00 ■ COM ® OTH ❑ FTY ■ scc • IND ■ COM ❑ OTH ■ PTY ■ SCC Monetary Contributions Summary 1. Amount received this period - contributions of $100 or more. (Include all Schedule A subtotals.) 2. Amount received this period - contributions of less than $100 (Do not itemize.) $ 24 8 00 3. Total monetary contributions received this period. (Add Lines 1 and 2. Enter here and on the Stunmary Page, Column A, Line 1.) TOTAL $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 5,000.00 5,248.00 Schedule A Monetary Contributions Received SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE Type or print In Ink. Amounts may be rounded to whole dollars. Statement covers period from iroml0(/ (f of through J l -pilo SCHEDULE A - NAME OF FILER DATE RECEIVED S a.m y. EcI9 ey-ti'op 1.0. NUMBER 5rAC,�j FULL NAME. STREET ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE OF CONTRIBUTOR (IF COMMITTEE. ALSO ENTER 1.0. NUMBER) 1A b143 01 vile) -r- -u l 339- k%CwvtC3A q 1)J1* CONTRIBUTOR CODE * IF AN INDIVIDUAL. ENTER OCCUPATION AND EMPLOYER (IF SELF-EMPLOYED, ENTER NAME OF BUSINESS) IND - ❑ COM ❑ OTH p PTY pscc AMOUNT RECEIVED THIS PERIOD CUMULAT)VETO GATE CALENDAR YEAR (JAN. 1 • DEC. 31) PER ELECTION TO DATE (IF REQUIRED) •owl -r3 .e.hanAt 5-14,z_ L Idej OSi .Au.J2. • a.6 tor -R- L i tkl • 5-01 Chciz, 64- q -' 1 tt 11.,11,,, IND ❑COM ❑ OTH PTY ❑ SCC • rt .61@00 a • (4.IND flCOM OTH OPT), CISCO y9� [IiNO ❑ COM ❑ OTH ❑ PTY ❑ SCC Q OTH ❑PTY ❑ SCC • Schedule A Summary 1. Amount received this period — contributions of $100 or more. (Include all Schedule A subtotals.) $ 2. Amount received this period — unitemized contributions of less than $100 $ 3. Total monetary contributions received this period. (Add Lines 1 and 2. Enter here and on the Summary Page, Column A, Line 1.) TOTAL $ 'Contributor Codas IND—Individual COM — Redplent Committee (other than PTY or SCC) OTH — Other PTY- Political Party SCC—Small Contributor Conmittae FPPC Form 460 (June/01) FPPc T9117EFPa pr!IAI!^e: 546lAsif;FPPd „vedule A Monetary Contributions Received SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE • NAME OF FILER DATE RECEIVED my ec)elogon FULL NAME, STREET ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE OF CONTRIBUTOR (IF COMMITTEE, ALSO ENTER 1.0. NUMBER) Type or print In Ink. Amounts may be rounded to whole dollars. CONTRIBUTOR CODE • IF AN INDIVIDUAL, ENTER OCCUPATION AND EMPLOYER (IF SELF•EMPLOYEO, ENTER NAME OF BUSINESS) Statement covers period from (D(10.(03 through 1)i-511 b3 AMOUNT RECEIVED THIS PERIOD SCHEDULE A CUMULATIVE TO DATE CALENDAR YEAR (JAN, 1 • DEC. 31) PER ELECTION TO DATE (IF REQUIRED) ID O 5 `3r;aUU(+Q9-rnac,-A A 1k e9vw.o 5, 1(.3W • `J' 03sLt A I 0-si AkrASO O G '•-111\ 5!. �ieyi 61o54 13eadA 1 C)6 q0 NO ❑ COM ❑9TH ❑ PTY ❑SCC fa r •e Wva 'lbl (a t m I crI aseL 58 /Ito r✓, ► mi t40 Loma. IDJ)4.12-LIP3 fi'enm (5 54 004 CA PR.e`) 67% 40tH; ,� 13.s- Oct1t 1Drt cA_ `:* a CD9.� I ,A H Schedule A Summary 1ND ❑ COM ❑ OTH ❑ PTY ❑SCC END [COM 00TH ❑ PTY ❑ SCC ileit S(3>165'1iA- act 7 ❑INO ❑ COM 20TH ❑ PTY ❑ scc ccgl Q', 5 .giND COM ❑ OTH ❑ PTY ❑ SCC p 0-)ne- S1Q -5pp SUBTOTALS 1. Amount received this period — contributions of $100 or more. // (Include all Schedule A subtotals.) $ �� v�a 2. Amount received this period — unitemized contributions of less than $100 $ 1 Total monetary contributions received this period. 0'7' � (Add Lines 1 and 2.' Enter here and on the Summary Page, Column A, Line 1.) TOTAL $ f�) 0'7 ' 'Contributor Codes IND - Individual COM - Recipient Committee (other than PTY or SCC) OTH — Other PTY - Political Party SCC = Small Contributor Committee FPPC Form 460 (June/01) FPFC T9II'Ffie N>?!AI!n.: 866/ASePPd City Council, November 10, 2004 Thank you so much for having Mike respond to one of my requests dated 8/23/04, copy enclosed. As Mike stated out of town business does not need a city license. Mike also most correctly states: "Further, cities are precluded by law from taxing business conducted outside the territorial boundaries of the city. See, e.g. General Motors Corp. v City of Los Angeles (1971) 5 Cal. 3d 229 (business tax cannot be levied on business with no place of business within the city where tax was levied on gross receipts solely because deliveries were shipped to addresses in city); City of San Jose v. Ruthroff & Englekirk Engineers, Inc. (1982) 131 Cal. App. 3d 462 (business tax on engineering firm invalid where firm had no office in the city and where its employees spent a total of 12 hours in the city during the taxable year working on a construction project)." Mike further states: "The work preformed by Moote was largely performed at its offices in Santa Ana. A small number of hours were spent in the City. Hence, no business license was required." Mike also correctly states taxing business conducted outside the territorial boundaries of the city is precluded by law. Mike does not state that business done inside the territorial boundaries of the city is precluded from taxing by said city. • • I suggest that the council should, (if not must), charge a business license or filing fee to all those the City does business with for the purpose of covering the City's cost of securing and filing said supplier's and or contractor's insurance policies. 1) Workman's compensation insurance a) Council may even want the City listed as also insured; 2) Liability insurance a) City as also insured so City will be notified of cancellation or non -renewal of policy; and 3) Auto insurance a) In case a company's employee has an auto accident while working on a city contract. I received no response on items 2, 3, or 4 of my request dated 9/23/04, copy enclosed. My request of 8/23/04, item 3, requests to review a copy of the contract between the City and Moote. I did not receive notice of when I could review requested contract. I am enclosing a copy of a form contract used by the City of San Leandro, so you have an example of a Contractual Services Agreement for the purpose of helping you find the one the City had with Moote, and thereby answer my public record request of 8/23/04, copy enclosed. To not have proof of proper insurance and boiler plate contracts with contractors and suppliers the City does business with, may be viewed by someone as not exercising due care or even due diligence. • 1 You, the City Council, directed Mike to answer my public records request. I presume Mike is the city employee who will set up my review of insurance policies provided by suppliers and contractors the City does business with along with the contract. Am I correct that Mike will set up an appointment for me to review the contract and proof of insurance the City had with Moote as per my public records request? (Copy enclosed) If Mike is the one, when will he contact me so as he can answer my public records requests? As a vested shareholder of the municipal corporation commonly referred to as the City of Hermosa Beach I remake my public records request for review of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th items of my public records request dated 9/23/04. 2. The insurance policy sent to the City prior to any work being done after the purchase agreement between the City and Moote Group. 3. Copies of any boiler plate contract signed by the consultant and or the City prior to any work done by the consultant referred to as The Moote Group. 4. The name of the city employee, elected or appointed, who I can ask for copies of purchase orders to review, such purchase orders issued to suppliers or contractors who the City has done business with. JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP A LAW PARTNERSHIP MICHAEL) ENKINS CHRISTI HOGIN MARK D. HENSLEY BRADLEY E. WOHLENBERG KARL H. BERGER GREGG KOVACEVICH LINDA A. BURROWS Roger Creighton 1070 Third Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 MANHATTAN TOWERS 1230 ROSECRANS AVENUE, SUITE 110 MANHATTAN BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90266 (310)643-8448 • FAX (310) 643-8441 WWW.LOCALGOVLAW.COM September 28, 2004 WRITER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: M]ENKINS@a LOCALGOVLAW.COM Re: City Contract with Paul A. Moote & Associates Dear Mr. Creighton: At its meeting of September 14, 2004, the Hermosa Beach City Council directed me to respond to your letter of August 23, 2004 regarding the above contract. In response to your inquiry, City's business license ordinance does not tax businesses that do not have a fixed place of business or that are not conducting work or services or selling goods at a fixed location in the City. Only consultants with a fixed place of business in the City are subject to a tax. See Section 5.04.200.B.1(Group 3) of the Municipal Code. Further, cities are precluded by law from taxing business conducted outside the territorial boundaries of the city. See, e.g. General Motors Corp. v. City of Los Angeles (1971) 5 Cal. 3d 229 (business tax cannot be levied on business with no place of business within city where tax was levied on gross receipts solely because deliveries were shipped to addresses in city); City of San Jose v. Ruthroff & Englekirk Engineers, Inc. (1982) 131 Cal. App. 3d 462 (business tax on engineering firm invalid where firm had no office in the city and where its employees spent a total of 12 hours in city during the taxable year working on a construction project). The work performed by Moote was largely performed at its offices in Santa Ana. A small number of hours were spent in the City. Hence, no business license was required. JENIQNS & HOGIN, LLP Roger Creighton September 28, 2004 Page 2 I trust this responds fully to your inquiry. Please let me know if you have any further questions. truly yours, ‘. 0.0 enkms City Attorney City of Hermosa Beach cc: Members of the City Council Steve Burrell Jenkins & Hogin, LLP Manhattan Towers 1230 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 110 M.anhattan Beach, CA 90266 Roger Creighton 107e Third Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 3t4 0? MAILED FROM ZIP CC>DE 111111111111111111111111i1111111111111!1111111111111111 llif • • • • Written Communication for the City Council Agenda: Date: August 23, 2004 From: Roger Creighton Re: Contract Services of Paul Moote & Associates Dear Council: On October 18, 2003 City Manger Burrell accepted and signed a "proposal" for independent Review of Building Inspection Services from Steve Murrow, Principal of the Moote Group. On January 22, 204 a Purchase Order was requested by S. Burrell for the subject "Contract Services" in the amount of $5,400.00. The City paid Moote Assoc. $2,562.63 on January 29, 2004 and $2,497.50 on April 29, 2004. A report was prepared dated March 29, 2004 directed to Stephen Burrell. My request for a business license for the party the check was made to (Moote) was that there was no business license. Why didn't the contractor have to get a City Business License per HBMC 5.04.020? Was he required to provide liability insurance, car insurance, and workers compensation insurance? Why wasn't a standard boiler plate agreement/contract prepared which would address such as: parties, terms, insurances, indemnification, notices, non-performance, litigation; attorney's fees, payment; reimbursables, expenses, etc.? Please consider this notice that inaction or allowing the city's business to be conducted in a manner not in compliance with Municipal Code requirements and other policies and procedures might be interpreted that you are not exercising required due care in the performance of your elected duties. My public records request is for you to furnish the location I can review the public records listed as # through #4: • 1. A copy of the business license issued to The Moote Group prior to The Moote Group performing any work or providing. any service to the City of Hermosa Beach; 2. The insurance policy trent to the City prior to any work being done alter the purchase order or agreement between the City and The Moote Group. 3. Copies of a boiler plate contract signed by the consultant and or the City prior to any work done by the consultant referred to as The Moote Group; and The name of the City employee, elected or appointed, I can ask for copies of purchase orders to review, such purchase orders issued to supplies or contractors who the Cit} has done business with. 06/24(04 TiiL 11:35 FAX 310 372 0186 CIT1'r0F HERMOSA BEACH City of $rmosa Teack..) PURCHASE ORDER DATE 1/22/04 ACCOUNT NUMBER • 001-4101.4201 REQUESTED 9Y S. BURRELL Mail two (2) copses of your invoices - c/o Finance Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-0299. TO: PAUL A. MOTE & ASSOC., INC. 1528 BROOKHOLLOW DR.. SUITE 57 SANTA ANA L_ CA 92705-5445 DELIVER MERCHANDISE TO P.O. APPROVAL DATE: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH C/0 Warrant Date: Warrant No.: QUANTITY UNIT FIN CE USE ONLY U B Y: _ ▪ DESCRIPTION PU R•SE ORDER 1201 - 15107 NUMBER 001 PLEASE REFERENCE PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER ON ALL PAPERWORK RELATING TO THIS ORDER. TERMS AND CONDITIONS • ACCEPTANCE: Delivery of any items or the perlormsnoe o1 eny aer.icas specnie° ,n this order constitutes acceptance by Seller of ills order upon these terns aro cordltions whether pr not accepted In w.rhino. This IMP s order is revocable at any te prior lc r_ch d& vary, or written ■ct»ptenea. • CELIVERY: Timely delivery is of tha essence of :Na order. • INSPECTION. All items ard/or services specified In thin or0er are subject to inal>ac:.on Inc SCCODtence. Buyer may reject any items that contairs defective mattrial or workmanship or does not conform to specifications or compos. In the event of reject an Buyer at Buyers option may retlrn artICIes a; Sellers expense for either Cnldit or replacement. • CANCELLATION: 11 sonar tails to make delivery of any of thio items a (piste perform any of the services specified above within the time specified herein or any ertena,on thereof granted to Buyer, Buyer May, without penally or any °pupation to solar eanan urs pun.:^.est order in whale or in part. • iNOEMNITY: Seiko shad defiant itf Buyer elects'. 093 inciemnPy ane nolo bwer, its employees, parent company. and subsidiary companies aro assigns harmless from enc aceiret any and all lessee, damegss, Iisti:ties or expanses, claims and lawsuits i1Uu0ing, but not limited to, attorneys lees which arse out of Buyers receipt o1 or use of any dein or srxvice provider: directly or indirectly le.g. through a subcontractor; to Buyer try Sere, and/or breach of this agreement by Soler. • NO ORAL WAIVER' No waiver of any of the tonne and conditions hereof shall ore bi ndinp upon Buyer unbae came is M writn7. • LIENS ANO CLAIMS: Seller, if Seller rer.dora sarvtcae on buyers property, or en, subcontractor employed by Seller lc render seriiCeS on buyers oropef:y Shall tees l!uye,s sroperty free kern 3005, cle'ms and erCumbrences )mechanics, laborers. or othcn•isei. and. it not, ENO drsoharge the same witNn ten 110) day: after any von Cam cr lee'+r. recorded. UNIT PRICE -OTAL 1 CONTRACT SERVICES copY.. 35,400.00 $5.400.00 TOTAL $5.400.00 I hereby request thi . o der DEPARTMENT This Purchase Order is not valid without authorized signature. ORIGINAL I hereby certify that the goods or services as specified hereon have been received end that the quantities and qualities are properly stated. ay Date I hereby certify that this order is authorized • FINANCE Dl ECT.R/CITY MANA Funds Encumbered APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT This invoice approved for payment in the amount of $ Dale Date 06/24/04 THU 11:36 FAX 310 372 6186 • A FULL SEIVICE LAND MANA4EMEN1 FIRM CITY OF HERHOSA BEACH ouz FOR _•. Hoon°. F. to ►Jo F{90 -ooZ Paul A. Moote & Associates, Inc. 1525 Brookhollow Drive, Suite 57 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Tel: 714 751-5557 • Fax: (714 751-4552 • www.rnoote.cem �.� URN •._. roren=ic Enernee: ine 6• Consulting of Bund Exoneration .. Land Acquisition Set vic€s+J' ,. Consuftn;p CAA Engine. -r< ... Cnct Estrn tion 1. Construction fMManarThird Pi+r:, Revie. October 18, 2003 City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Atm; Stephen Burrell, City Manager Re: Proposal for Independent Review of Building Inspection Services Dear Mr. Burrell, Pursuant to your request I have initially reviewed the development file of two specific projects within the City of Hermosa Beach. It is my understanding that you are desirous of a third party review and analysis of the overall building and planning activities in the Development Department; including, but not limited to, evaluation of the permitting process, evaluation of the inspection services provided, evaluation of participants knowledge, fairness and reasonableness, and evaluation of participants professionalism and ethical services, relative to the specific projects. In providing such a review I will conduct interviews with building inspectors, homeowners, architects, and contractors who were involved with the specific projects. In addition, I will review plans, files, applicable zoning, planning, and building codes and regulations. I will follow guidelines as established by the code of ethics of various building inspectors' industry associations. I anticipate that the review will require approximately 40 hours of my time to review files and plans, visit the project sites, interview various participants, research and analyze the data and prepare a report. The estimated fee is $5,400.00; 40 hours at $135.00 per hour. Please allow me two weeks until Nov. 3"1 for completion. If you wish to engage our services please countersign below. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, The Mobte Group Steven M. lviurow Principal Accepted by: Date: • • CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made at San Leandro, California, as of June 5, 2000, by and between the CITY OF SAN LEANDRO, a municipal corporation ("City"), and , ("Contractor"), who agree as follows: 1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Contractor shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A. Contractor shall provide said services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A. 2. PAYMENT. City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B. The payments specified in Exhibit B shall be the only payments to be made to Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor shall submit all billings for said services to City in the manner specified in Exhibit B; or, if no manner be specified in Exhibit B, then according to the usual and customary procedures and practices which Contractor uses for billing clients similar to City. 3. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. Except as set forth in Exhibit C, Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall furnish to Contractor only the facilities and equipment listed in Exhibit C according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 4. GENERAL PROVISIONS. The general provisions set forth in Exhibit D are part of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and Standard Contractual Services Agreement Page 1 of 3 • • any other terms or conditions of this Agreement, the other term or condition shall control insofar as it is inconsistent with the general provisions. 5. EXHIBITS. All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this reference incorporated herein. 6. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered by ("Administrator"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Administrator or his or her designee. 7. NOTICES. Any written notice to Contractor shall be sent to: Any written notice to City shall be sent to: 835 East 14th Street San Leandro, CA 94577 510-577-3421 Standard Contractual Services Agreement Page 2 of 3 • • Executed as of the day first above stated: Approved as to form: Steve Meyers, City Attorney Approved as to Budget Authority: Tim Hansen, Finance Director 010-41-001-5120 CITY OF SAN LEANDRO, a municipal corporation By: By: John Jermanis, City Manager Standard Contractual Services Agreement Page 3 of 3 • • EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES The contractor shall provide planning support services in the Development Services Department for six months or until December 31, 2000, to oversee the current planning function. Contractor hours would be 9:30 am to 5:00 p.m., 6-1/2 hours per day or 32.5 hours per week at a rate of $62.00 per hour. The primary assignment will be working with the Project Planner to process various amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. Under my direction, Contractor would also be responsible for directing staff on development applications, reviewing staff reports, and attending Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustments meetings as needed. EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 1 • • EXHIBIT B PAYMENT SCHEDULE City shall pay Contractor an amount not to exceed the total sum of Fifty Two Thousand Three Hundred Ninety Dollars and No Cents ($52,390.00) for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor shall submit invoices, not more often than once a month during the term of this Agreement, based on the cost for services performed and reimbursable costs incurred prior to the invoice date. Invoices shall contain the following information. 1. Serial identifications of progress bills, i.e., Progress Bill No. 1. 2. The beginning and ending dates of the billing period. 3. A Task Summary containing the original contract amount, the amount of prior billings, the total due this period, the balance available and the percentage of completion. 4. For each work item in each task, a copy of the applicable time sheets shall be submitted showing the name of the person doing the work, the hours spent by each person, a brief description of the work, and each reimbursable expense. City shall make monthly payments, based on such invoices, for services satisfactorily performed, and for authorized reimbursable costs incurred. City shall pay the last 10% of the total sum due pursuant to this Agreement within forty- five (45) days after completion of the services and submittal to City, if all services due pursuant to this Agreement have been satisfactorily performed. Exhibit "B" Page 1 of 2 • • The total sum stated above shall be the total which City shall pay for the services to be rendered by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. City shall not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost whatsoever incurred by Contractor in rendering services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall make no payment for any extra, further or additional service pursuant to this Agreement unless such extra service and the price therefor is agreed to in writing executed by the City Manager or other designated official of City authorized to obligate City thereto prior to the time such extra service is rendered and in no event shall such change order exceed twenty-five (25%) of the initial contract price. Fees for work performed by Contractor on an hourly basis shall not exceed the amounts shown on the fee schedule of hourly billing included as Attachment B-1. Reimbursable expenses are specified on Attachment B-2, and shall not exceed N/A ($ N/A ). Expenses not listed on Exhibit B-2 are not chargeable to City. The services to be provided under this Agreement may be terminated without cause at any point in time in the sole and exclusive discretion of City. In this event, City shall compensate the Contractor for all outstanding costs incurred for work satisfactorily completed as of the date of written notice thereof. Contractor shall maintain adequate logs and timesheets in order to verify costs incurred to date. The Contractor is not authorized to perform any services or incur any costs whatsoever under the terms of this Agreement until receipt of a fully executed Purchase Order from the Finance Department of the City of San Leandro. Exhibit "B" Page 2 of 2 • • EXHIBIT B-1 FEE SCHEDULE Contractor shall be compensated at the rate of $62.00 per hour. No additional fees or charges shall be paid unless otherwise approved by the Contract Administrator. a Exhibit "B-1" Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT C City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space, as may be reasonably necessary for Contractor's use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quantity, and time of furnishing said physical facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be obligated to furnish any facility which may involve incurring any direct expense, including, but not limiting the generality of this exclusion, long-distance telephone or other communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities. Exhibit C Page 1 of 1 • • EXHIBIT D GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right to control Contractor only insofar as the results of Contractor's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which Contractor accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. 2. LICENSES; PERMITS; ETC. Contractor represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Contractor to practice its profession. Contractor represents and warrants to City that Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Contractor to practice its profession. In addition to the foregoing, Contractor shall obtain and maintain during the term hereof a valid City of San Leandro Business License. 3. TIME. Contractor shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance of Contractor's obligations pursuant to this Agreement. 4. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract "occurrence coverage" insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. The cost of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's bid. (a) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG 0001.) 2. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025. 3. Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability Insurance. Exhibit D Page 1 of 7 • • (b) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: 1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. (c) Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. (d) Other Insurance Provisions. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages. a. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor, premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor, or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of the protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. b. The Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Exhibit D Page 2 of 7 • 1 c. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. d. The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 2. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Contractor for the City. 3. Professional Liability. Contractor shall carry professional liability insurance in an amount deemed by the City to adequately protect the Contractor against liability caused by negligent acts, errors or omissions on the part of the Contractor in the course of performance of the services specified in this Agreement. 4. All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. (e) Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. Exhibit D Page 3 of 7 • • (f) Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. (g) Subcontractors. Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. (h) The Risk Manager of City may approve a variation in those insurance requirements upon a determination that the coverages, scope, limits and forms of such insurance are either not commercially available or that the City's interests are otherwise fully protected. 5. CONTRACTOR NO AGENT. Except as City may specify in writing, Contractor shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Contractor shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever. 6. ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITED. No party to this Agreement may assign any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement shall be void and of no effect. 7. PERSONNEL. Contractor shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires the removal of any such persons, Contractor shall, immediately upon receiving notice from city of such desire of City, cause the removal of such person or persons. 8. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (a) Affirmative Action in Employment, Contractor shall comply with the Affirmative Action Program and Equal Employment requirements of the City. 1. During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor agrees as follows: a. Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, handicap, age, or national origin. Contractor will take Exhibit D Page 4 of 7 • affirmative action to ensure that applicants for employment are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, handicap, sex, sexual orientation, age, or national origin. Such action shall include but not be limited to the following: employment; upgrading; demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection from training, including apprenticeship. b. Contractor will incorporate the above Affirmative Action provisions in all sub -consultants for services covered by this Agreement. (b) Minority and Female -owned Business Enterprise. In connection with the performance of this Agreement, Contractor shall comply with the City's current policies and/or use its best efforts to obtain the maximum utilization of minority-owned business enterprises based in San Leandro and ensure that minority and female -owned enterprises based in San Leandro shall have maximum practicable opportunity for subcontractor work under this Agreement. (c) General Employment Provisions Relating to Handicap/Disability Discrimination. No qualified individual with a handicap or disability shall, solely on the basis of such handicap or disability, be subjected to discrimination in employment by Contractor. (d) Reports. Contractor shall provide such reports and/or documents to City demonstrating compliance with the terms hereof. 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall perform all services required pursuant to this Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which Contractor is engaged in the geographical area in which Contractor practices its profession. All instruments of service of whatsoever nature which Contractor delivers to City pursuant to this Agreement shall be prepared in a substantial, first class and workmanlike manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing in Contractor's profession. Exhibit D Page 5 of 7 10. HOLD HARMLESS AND RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTORS. Contractor shall take all responsibility for the work, shall bear all losses and damages directly or indirectly resulting to him, to any subcontractor, to the City, to City officers and employees, or to parties designated by the City, on account of the performance or character of the work, unforeseen difficulties, accidents, occurrences or other causes predicated on active or passive negligence of the Contractor or of any subcontractor. Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, directors, employees and agents from and against any or all loss, liability, expense, claim, costs (including costs of defense), suits, and damages of every kind, nature and description directly or indirectly arising from the performance of the work. This paragraph shall not be construed to exempt the City, its employees and officers from its own fraud, willful injury or violation of law whether willful or negligent. For purposes of Section 2782 of the Civil Code the parties hereto recognize and agree that this agreement is not a construction contract. By execution of this Agreement, Contractor acknowledges and agrees that it has read and understands the provisions hereof and that this paragraph is a material element of consideration. Approval of the insurance contracts does not relieve the Contractor or subcontractors from liability under this paragraph. 11. GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Contractor shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program. 12. DOCUMENTS. All reports, data, maps, models, charts, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda or other written documents or materials prepared by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of City upon completion of the work to be performed hereunder or upon termination of the Agreement. 13. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS. Contractor shall comply with all laws applicable to the performance of the work hereunder, including, but not limited to, laws prohibiting discrimination based on race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status or sex. 14. USE OF RECYCLED PRODUCTS. Contractors shall prepare and submit all reports, written studies and other printed material on recycled paper to the extent it is available at equal or less cost than virgin paper. Exhibit D Page 6 of 7 15. • PROFESSIONAL SEAL. Where applicable in the determination of the contract administrator, the first page of a technical report, first page of design specifications, and each page of construction drawings shall be stamped/sealed and signed by the licensed professional responsible for the report/design preparation. The stamp/seal shall be in a block entitled "Seal and Signature of Registered Professional with report/design responsibility" as per sample below. Seal and Signature of Registered Professional with 1 report/design responsibility Exhibit D Page 7 of 7 • • ()-,-,2L-b-iLt- //ft/DS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, December 14, 2004, at the hour of 7:14 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE All the children receiving Bookmark Contest Awards ROLL CALL: Present: Keegan, Reviczky, Tucker, Mayor Yoon Absent: Edgerton ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky asked that the meeting be adjourned in memory of Father Ignatius Hinkle, who recently passed away in a home for Franciscan priests in the Bay area, noting that Father Ignatius had been an instructor of his at Bishop Montgomery High School, served as a pastor at Our Lady of Guadalupe Church and a missionary in Mexico, and was often seen roller skating on the Strand in his Roman collar and cross. He announced that there would be a Christmas tree recycling bin at the Clark Building parking lot beginning on December 26, with a reminder to everyone that trees would also be picked up on regular trash days as usual. Councilmember Tucker provided a phone number (1-888-382-1222) to be called from a person's cell phone to protect them from receiving solicitor phone calls. He then announced the wrapping party for the South Bay Toy Drive at the Manhattan Beach Joslyn Center, 1601 Valley Drive, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., noting that parents and children were welcome and T-shirts, entertainment and food would be provided, and requested that attendees bring scissors and tape. Mayor Yoon congratulated USC Football on going to Miami to defend its championship; reminded everyone about the City's New Year's Eve Celebration at Pier Plaza, a fun family -friendly event; and wished everyone a Merry Christmas and a Happy Kwanzaa. He said on Thursday morning, December 16, between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m., on KTLA, Channel 5, the Hermosa Valley School student council would be seen in action representing the City; and then announced the Household Hazardous Waste Round -Up event on Saturday, January 22, 2005, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at Clark Stadium on Valley Drive between 8th and 11th Streets. PROCLAMATIONS & PRESENTATIONS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PUBLIC LIBRARY 2004 BOOKMARK CONTEST WINNERS Martha Philippoff, manager of the Hermosa Beach Library, introduced Nina Peters, Youth Services Librarian who explained the contest and presented awards to the children, and Mayor Yoon congratulated each one of them and presented City pins. City Council Minutes 12-14-04 Page 11545 a • • HERMOSA BEACH HISTORY MONTH Mayor Yoon proclaimed January 2005 Hermosa Beach History Month to kick off preparations for the City's centennial celebration in 2007. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: There was no written correspondence. Coming forward at this time to address the Council were: Gene Dreher — Hermosa Beach, expressed concern about the jet traffic late at night, which appears to be coming from Long Beach rather than LAX, and asked the Council to look into the problem of aircraft noise disturbing his sleep at night (Mayor Yoon said that the Council subcommittee would make sure that their contact for LAX noise problems is made aware of the situation); and Greg Grinnell — Hermosa Beach, requested that the Council vote favorably to expand free WiFi service to the entire City and urged residents to speak at the January 11, 2005 Council meeting at which this topic will be discussed again. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (q), with the exception of the following items, which were removed for discussion in item 4, but are shown in order for clarity: (d) Keegan, (f) Tucker, (g) Reviczky, (I) Tucker, (o) Reviczky, (p) Reviczky; and (q) Tucker. Motion Reviczky, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the absence of Councilmember Edgerton. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Adjourned regular meeting held on November 23, 2004; and 2) Regular meeting held on November 23, 2004. Action: To approve as presented the City Council minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting of November 23, 2004, and the Regular meeting of November 23, 2004. (Edgerton absent) (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 38582 THROUGH 38790, INCLUSIVE. Action: To ratify the check register, as presented. (Edgerton absent) (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. City Council Minutes 12-14-04 Page 11546 Action: To receive and the file tentative future agenda items, as presented. (Edgerton absent) (d) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE DONATIONS OF $1,000 TO THE REDONDO UNION HIGH SCHOOL GRAD NIGHT COMMITTEE 2005 AND $1,000 TO THE MIRA COSTA HIGH SCHOOL G.R.A.D. BOOSTER CLUB FOR 2005. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 7, 2004. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Keegan for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Action: To approve, as recommended by staff, the following donations: 1) $1,000 to the Redondo Union High School Grad Night Committee 2005; and 2) $1,000 to the Mira Costa High School G.R.A.D. Booster Club for 2005. Motion Keegan, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Councilmember Edgerton. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS AND REFER THEM TO THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated December 6, 2004. (f) Claimant: Drucker, Steven Date of Loss: 08-17-04 Date Filed: 12-01-04 Allegation: Property damage Claimant: Myers, Diana Date of Loss: 05-23-04 Date Filed: 11-18-04 Allegation: Police Misconduct Claimant: Nolan, Robert Date of Loss: 05-23-04 Date Filed: 11-18-04 Allegation: Police Misconduct Action: To deny the above claims and refer them to the City's Liability Claims Administrator, as recommended by staff. (Edgerton absent) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 1, 2004. City Council Minutes 12-14-04 Page 11547 (g) • • This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Tucker for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of December 1, 2004. Motion Tucker, second Keegan. The motion carried, noting the absence of Councilmember Edgerton. RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT DONATIONS OF $15 FROM MILTON WEINER TO BE USED FOR VETERANS' MEMORIAL MAINTENANCE; $500 FROM THE WOMAN'S CLUB OF HERMOSA BEACH TO BE USED FOR VETERANS' MEMORIAL MAINTENANCE; $450 FROM THE WOMAN'S CLUB OF HERMOSA BEACH TO BE USED FOR THE TREE LIGHTING, SAND SNOWMAN AND BREAKFAST WITH SANTA EVENTS; $100 FROM AN ANONYMOUS DONOR TO BE USED FOR VETERANS' MEMORIAL MAINTENANCE; $50 FROM KATHARINE DAVIDSON TO BE USED FOR THE PURCHASE OF MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT; AND, $250 FROM THE HERMOSA KIWANIS FOUNDATION TO BE USED FOR THE TREE LIGHTING EVENT. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 2, 2004. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky in order to acknowledge and thank the donors. Action: To accept, as recommended by staff, the following donations: 1) $15 from Milton Weiner for Veterans' Memorial maintenance; 2) $500 from Woman's Club of Hermosa Beach for Veterans' Memorial maintenance; 3) $450 from Woman's Club of Hermosa Beach for the Tree Lighting, Sand Snowman and Breakfast with Santa events;. 4) $100 from an anonymous donor for Veterans' Memorial maintenance; 5) $50 from Katharine Davidson for the purchase of miscellaneous equipment for the Fire Department; and 6) $250 from Hermosa Kiwanis Foundation for the Tree Lighting event. Motion Reviczky, second Keegan. The motion carried, noting the absence of Councilmember Edgerton. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE LIST OF REGULAR AND ONGOING CITY BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTIVE TERMS THAT WILL EXPIRE DURING THE 2005 CALENDAR YEAR. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated December 1, 2004. Action: To receive and file the list of regular and ongoing City Board and Commission appointive terms that will expire during the 2005 calendar year, as recommended. (Edgerton absent) City Council Minutes 12-14-04 Page 11548 (i) (i) RECOMMENDATION TO CONFIRM BY MINUTE ORDER THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S SIMILAR USE DETERMINATION, PURSUANT TO SECTION 17.26.04 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ALLOW THE USE OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT FOR A CULINARY SCHOOL. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 8, 2004. Action: To confirm by minute order the Community Development Director's similar use determination, pursuant to Section 17.26.04 of the Zoning Ordinance, to allow the use of a portion of an existing restaurant for a culinary school. (Edgerton absent) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 2004. Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of November 17, 2004. (Edgerton absent) (k) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE ICRMA JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated December 9, 2004. (1) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 04- 6370, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT PURPOSES AND APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES TO THE INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY'S GOVERNING BOARD AND ITS SEPARATE RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS." (Edgerton absent) RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. 02-108 STREET IMPROVEMENTS (SECOND STREET FROM PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY TO THE STRAND AND MONTEREY BOULEVARD FROM FOURTH STREET TO HERONDO STREET) TO ALLIANCE STREETWORKS, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA BASED UPON THEIR LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BID OF $428,683; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES AS NECESSARY WITHIN THE CONTINGENCY OF $42,900; APPROVE A CHANGE IN THE SCOPE OF WORK TO REDUCE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT BY APPROXIMATELY $74,683; AND, APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND DAVID MOMENI, PHD, FOR A FEE NOT TO City Council Minutes 12-14-04 Page 11549 (m) • • EXCEED $20,080 AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated December 6, 2004. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Tucker for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director Richard Morgan responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Award the Construction Contract for Project No. 02-108 Street Improvements (Second Street from Pacific Coast Highway to The Strand and Monterey Boulevard from Fourth Street to Herondo Street) to Alliance Streetworks, Anaheim, California based upon their lowest responsible bid of $428,683; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the construction contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within the contingency of $42,900; approve a change in the scope of work to reduce the contract amount by approximately $74,683; and 4) Approve Professional Services Agreement for construction inspection services between the City of Hermosa Beach and David Momeni, PhD, for a fee not to exceed $20,080 and authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest subject to approval by the City Attorney; as amended by the Council this evening to add to the construction contract the replacement of pavement on Second Street between Beach Drive and the Strand. Motion Tucker, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Councilmember Edgerton. RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE BID AWARD TO REFURBISH THE FIRE STATION APPARATUS BAY FLOOR PER FIRE DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS TO THT FLOORING OF HAWTHORNE, CALIFORNIA AND APPROPRIATE $9,120 TO COMPLETE THE APPARATUS BAY FLOOR PROJECT FROM THE FIRE PROTECTION FUND. Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated December 7, 2004. Action: To authorize the bid award to refurbish the fire station apparatus bay floor per fire department specifications to THT Flooring of Hawthorne, California and appropriate $9,120 to complete the apparatus bay floor project from the fire protection fund. (n) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE BID AWARD TO REFURBISH THE FIRE STATION PERSONNEL SHOWERS PER FIRE DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS TO KEN LEAL PLUMBING OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA City Council Minutes 12-14-04 Page 11550 IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,600. Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated December 7, 2004. Action: To authorize the bid award to refurbish the fire station personnel showers per fire department specifications to Ken Leal Plumbing of Anaheim, California in the amount of $10,600. (Edgerton absent) (o) RECOMMENDATION TO DIRECT STAFF TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS FOR PRIVATE AMBULANCE TRANSPORT SERVICE. Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated December 7, 2004. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting. Fire Chief Tingley and City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this issue was: Aaron Marks — President of the Hermosa Beach Firefighters Association, presented, as an alternative to private ambulance transport service, a proposal to increase revenue by outsourcing billing and increasing the existing transport fees, which he said are extraordinarily low compared to other California cities, noting that the increased revenue would be enough to fund an additional firefighter per shift to enhance service to the City. (P) Action: To direct staff to proceed with the preparation of an RFP to solicit proposals for private ambulance transport service, as recommended by staff, and to include a review and analysis of the alternate proposal presented by the Firefighters Association. Motion Tucker, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Councilmember Edgerton. RECOMMENDATION TO DIRECT STAFF TO RETURN WITH A DRAFT ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.52 REGULATING NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 8, 2004. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting. Community Development Director Blumenfeld responded to Council questions. Action: To direct staff to return with a draft ordinance to amend Chapter 17.52 regulating nonconforming buildings and uses, as recommended. Motion Reviczky, second Keegan. The motion carried, noting the absence of Councilmember Edgerton. City Council Minutes 12-14-04 Page 11551 (q) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE AWARD OF THE RE -ROOFING CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. 04-633 RE -ROOFING OF CITY BUILDINGS — COMMUNITY SERVICES AND SOUTH SCHOOL TO ALL AMERICAN ROOFING CO. OF THE CITY OF PARAMOUNT IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,520; AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION OF $21,520 FORM THE 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE CONTRACT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND, AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES AS NECESSARY WITHIN THE CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $2,000. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated December 9, 2004. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Tucker for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director Richard Morgan responded to Council questions. Action: Approve staff recommendation to: 1) Authorize the award of the re -roofing contract for Project No. 04-633 Re -Roofing of City Buildings — Community Services and South School to All American Roofing Co. of the City of Paramount in the amount of $19,520; 2) Authorize the appropriation of $21,520 form the 301 Capital Improvement Fund; authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; and 3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within the contingency amount of $2,000; with additional direction to staff to look at alternatives for relocating staff currently in the Community Services building to provide a safe working environment and to avoid further expense for repairs to an old building that should be demolished. Motion Mayor Yoon, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the absence of Councilmember Edgerton. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 04-1245 — "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 17.46.101, PERTAINING TO THE ALLOWABLE SIZE AND HEIGHT OF CHIMNEYS." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated December 1, 2004. Community Development Director Blumenfeld responded to Council questions City Council Minutes 12-14-04 Page 11552 Proposed Action: To waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 04-1245. Motion Keegan, second Mayor Yoon. The motion was replaced by the following substitute motion. Action: To continue the item to the Council meeting of January 11, 2005 and direct staff to include in the ordinance a definition of "non-combustible." Motion Reviczky, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the absence of Councilmember Edgerton. 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 2(d), (f), (g), (I), (m), (o), (p) and (q) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S PLUMBING CODE REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF GREASE REMOVAL SYSTEMS FOR EXISTING FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 6, 2004. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this issue was: Rick DiCesare — MRC Technologies, Newbury Park, showed a typical grease removal device, explained its operation and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve staff recommendation to: 1) Direct staff to schedule informational meetings with the business community on the proposed requirements for grease traps and interceptors; and 2) Schedule the matter for City Council hearing in March 2005. Motion Reviczky, second Keegan. The motion carried, noting the absence of Councilmember Edgerton. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. APPROVE CHANGES IN THE WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM OPERATION WITH THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH. Memorandum from City Council Minutes 12-14-04 Page 11553 WAVE/Transit Subcommittee Mayor Yoon and Mayor Pro Tem Reviczky dated December 7, 2004. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this issue was: Darian Debellis - Hermosa Beach resident and South Bay Yellow Cab representative, assured the Council that his company could offer excellent service to senior and disabled residents should the Wave not be able to accommodate their needs in a timely manner; said that the wait time for a cab is five to ten minutes, much less than the wait time for the Wave. Proposed Action: To end the City's relationship with the Wave program as of June 30, 2005 and transfer riders to the cab system. Motion Keegan, second Tucker. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Reviczky and Mayor Yoon, and the absence of Edgerton. Action: To continue the item to the Council meeting of January 11, 2005 for consideration by the full Council. Motion Keegan, second Mayor Yoon. The motion carried, noting the absence of Councilmember Edgerton. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned in memory of Father Ignatius Hinkle on Tuesday, December 14, 2004, at the hour of 9:18 p.m. to the regular Meeting on Tuesday, January 11, 2005, at 7:10 p.m. Dept14, City Clerk CD City Council Minutes 12-14-04 Page 11554 eoic:fei,/,//os vchlist Check Register Page: 1 12/09/2004 4:49:20PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38791 12/9/2004 05817 ACCELA INC. 2005M684 Software Maint & Support/7/1-6/30/06 715-1550 16,442.80 Total : 16,442.80 38792 12/9/2004 12482 ACCURINT 1114400-2004 Background Information Services/11/04 • 001-2101-4201 34.35 Total : 34.35 38793 12/9/2004 12963 ADAMS, TODD L, 4601-04002 Lighting Technician/11/18-11/21 001-4601-4201 302.50 Total : 302.50 38794 12/9/2004 12185 AFSS SOUTHERN DIVISION 2201-16511 Registration/S. Diaz/12/14/04 001-2201-4317 25.00 Total : 25.00 38795 12/9/2004 06290 AIR SOURCE INDUSTRIES 416401 Air Tanks Filled/12/04 001-2201-4309 216.80 Total : 216.80 38796 12/9/2004 12066 AIT 5173 Toner/10/04 715-1206-4305 84.26 Total : 84.26 •'97 12/9/2004 09484 APWA 65927 2005 Agency Membership & Dues 001-4202-4315 698.13 Total : 698.13 38798 12/9/2004 00152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 586-3808013 Shop Towel Service/11/04 715-4206-4309 40.56 586-3808014 Mats & Shop Towel Services/11 /04 001-3104-4309 68.09 586-3808015 Mats & Shop Towel Services/11/04 001-2201-4309 46.45 586-3808016 Mats Cleaned/11/04 001-2101-4309 56.80 2b vchlist Check Register Page: 2 12/09/2004 4:49:20PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38798 12/9/2004 00152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 586-3808017 Mats Cleaned/11/04 001-4204-4309 62.80 • 586-380819 Mats Cleaned/11/04 001-4204-4309 74.68 586-3820010 Shop Towel Service/11/04 715-4206-4309 77.84 586-3820011 Mats & Shop Towel Service/11/04 001-3104-4309 68.09 586-3820012 Mats & Shop Towel Service/11/17 001-2201-4309 46.45 586-3820013 Mats Cleaned/11/04 001-2101-4309 56.80 586-3820014 Mats Cleaned/11 /04 001-4204-4309 62.80 586-3820016 Mats Cleaned/11/04 001-4204-4309 74.68 Total : 736.04 38799 12/9/2004 02487 ARCH WIRELESS N7896291L Pager Services/Nov 04 001-4601-4201 11.59 • 001-4202-4201 3.28 715-1206-4201 5.79 Total : 20.66 38800 12/9/2004 00407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY 28429 Zone Call & Repair Dead Bolt/11/04 001-4204-4309 50.00 28632 Door Repair/City Hail/11/04 001-4204-4309 75.00 9255 Keys Made/11/29/04 001-4204-4309 3.90 9427 Keys Made/11/04 001-4601-4305 58.46 9432 Lock Repair/11/04 715-2101-4311 10.00 Page: 2 1 vchlist 12/09/2004 4:49:20PM Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 3 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38800 38801 12/9/2004 00407 12/9/2004 03190 AVIATION LOCK & KEY (Continued) BLUEPRINT SERVICE & SUPPLY C 113798 6986 • 38802 12/9/2004 00163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 38803 4,04 12/9/2004 00261 38805 12/9/2004 12317 38806 12/9/2004 00153 0402932 0404629 0406518 0408527 0410382 12/9/2004 00034 BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORPORATIC 282278 CA PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATIO 2101-16518 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 267720 CINTAS CORPORATION 426503762 426506838 Plans Copied/11/04 001-4202-4201 Plans & Specs Copied 001-4202-4201 Prisoner Laundry/11/04 001-2101-4306 Prisoner Laundry/11/04 001-2101-4306 Prisoner Laundry/11/04 001-2101-4306 Prisoner Laundry/11/04 001-2101-4306 Prisoner Laundry/11/04 001-2101-4306 WINDOW ENVELOPES 001-1208-4305 Tuition/Higgins/Post Class 001-2101-4312 POLICE VEST/REFLECTIVE STRIP 150-2113-5401 Uniform Rental/11/04 001-4202-4314 Uniform Rental/11/04 001-4202-4314 Total : Total : 197.36 168.22 79.89 248.11 106.85 89.26 66.66 145.09 83.37 Total : 491.23 Total : 604.46 Total : 51.00 Total : 604.46 51.00 265.08 265.08 119.42 91.42 Page: 3 3 vchlist Check Register Page: 4 12/09/2004 4:49:20PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38806 12/9/2004 00153 CINTAS CORPORATION (Continued) 426509860 Uniform Rental/11/04 001-4202-4314 91.42 • 426512934 Uniform Rental/11/04 001-4202-4314 163.65 426515949 Uniform Rental/11/04 001-4202-4314 97.65 Total : 563.56 38807 12/9/2004 04928 COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR THE 12/08/04 Reimburse/Liability Trust Account/Nov 04 705-1209-4324 21,036.07 Total : 21,036.07 38808 12/9/2004 07809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 55326844 Office Supplies/9/04 001-1208-4305 530.98 56829683 Office Supplies/11/04 001-1208-4305 193.91 56901979 Office Supplies/11/04 001-1208-4305 87.10 Total : 811.99 .8809 12/9/2004 08855 D & D SERVICES, INC. 23383 Dead Animal Disposal/11/04 110-3302-4201 285.00 Total : 285.00 38810 12/9/2004 09053 DEKRA-LITE 004739 Holiday Ornaments Installed/12/04 109-3301-4319 4,271.00 Total : 4,271.00 38811 12/9/2004 00147 DEVELOPMENT, THE 150476 Film Processing/11/04 001-2101-4305 15.22 Total : 15.22 38812 12/9/2004 00165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PART 11/30/04 Auto Parts Purchase/Nov 04 Page: 4 vchlist Check Register Page: 5 12/09/2004 4:49:20PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38812 12/9/2004 00165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PART (Continued) • 715-3104-4311 77.05 715-4206-4309 287.36 715-4206-4311 260.80 715-2601-4311 26.41 715-2101-4311 530.26 715-6101-4311 55.33 715-2201-4311 93.25 715-3302-4311 206.87 001-2021 31.37 001-2022 -31.37 Total : 1,537.33 38813 12/9/2004 12729 ENFACT SOLUTIONS, INC. 1020 ADMIN OF STORMWATER PROGRAM/OCT 04 160-3102-4201 3,400.00 1023 ADMIN STORMWATER PROGRAM/NOV 04 160-3102-4201 3,720.00 Total : 7,120.00 38814 12/9/2004 10306 GAGLIA, MICK 2101-16515 Mileage Reimbursement/10/18-10/22/04 001-2101-4312 74.23 Total : 74.23 38815 12/9/2004 12934 GOLDEN BELL PRODUCTS 11584 SANITARY TREATMENT MANHOLES/ROACHE • 160-3102-4201 900.00 Total : 900.00 38816 12/9/2004 00065 HERMOSA BEACH CAR WASH, ZI 12/01/04 City Vehicles Washed/11/04 715-2101-4311 252.75 715-3302-4311 5.95 Total : 258.70 38817 12/9/2004 03432 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 3027347 Street Maint Tools/11/04 001-3104-4309 39.98 3110763 Building Supplies/Plaza Tree Stand/11/04 109-3301-4309 139.40 Page: 5 5 vchlist Check Register Page: 6 12/09/2004 4:49:20PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38817 12/9/2004 03432 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) • 5147525 Electrical Supplies/11/04 105-2601-4309 103.41 7203222 Batteries/11/04 001-6101-4309 63.42 9125831 Ceiling Tile/South Schoo1/10/04 001-4204-4309 25.10 Total : 371.31 38818 12/9/2004 12919 HOPKINS CONSTRUCTION CO., G 2 MUNICIPAL PIER REOVATION PHASE 111/10/04 121-8630-4201 20,000.00 122-8630-4201 90,000.00 125-8630-4201 10,000.00 150-8630-4201 41,500.00 160-8630-4201 20,000.00 301-8630-4201 88,804.02 302-8630-4201 40,000.00 Total : 310,304.02 38819 12/9/2004 05356 HUNTER -KENNEDY & ASSOC. HERMSC1104 ADMIN/USED OIL PROGRAM/2005 CALENDAR 160-3105-4201 950.00 Total : 950.00 38820 12/9/2004 10820 JENKINS & HOGIN,LLP 11779 Legal Re: Pitchess Motions/11/04 001-1131-4201 424.50 11780 Legal Re: Genera1/11/04 001-1131-4201 2,436.00 11781 Legal Re: Stop 011/11/04 001-1131-4201 39.00 11782 Legal Re: Land Use/11/04 001-1131-4201 966.00 Total : 3,865.50 38821 12/9/2004 01165 JOBS AVAILABLE 425041 Employment Ad/11/04 001-1203-4201 82.80 Total : 82.80 Page: 6 l0 vchlist Check Register Page: 7 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/09/2004 4:49:20PM Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38822 12/9/2004 12971 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLA ID11930021-0 38823 12/9/2004 10496 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 202992267 • 38824 12/9/2004 00999 L.A. CO DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS AR316382 38825 12/9/2004 00167 LEARNED LUMBER 38826 12/9/2004 11452 38827 12/9/2004 11984 • 38828 12/9/2004 12599 38829 12/9/2004 02648 LEHNER/MARTIN,INC LEWIS, WAYNE LOCKLEAR, DEREK BRENT LOS ANGELES COUNTY 38830 12/9/2004 12962 MCDONALDS B930041 907372 2101-16513 4601-03955 AR316323 4601-03999 Refund Ambulance Transport 001-3840 Copier Usage/Nov 04 715-4601-4201 715-1208-4201 715-2201-4201 715-3302-4201 Total : Total : ARTESIA BOULEVARD MEDIAN MAINT/10/04 105-2601-4251 Building Supplies/Pier Surf Plaques 105-2601-4309 Helium Tank Rental & Filled 001-4601-4308 Mileage & Parking Reimburse/11/15-19/04 001-2101-4312 Instructor Payment/9107-9109/9117-9118 001-4601-4221 Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : PUMP STATION INSPECTION/MAINT10/04 160-3102-4251 Total : 272.81 272.81 104.07 223.19 49.60 8.14 385.00 159.52 159.52 63.78 63.78 9.60 9.60 124.42 124.42 784.00 784.00 1,194.50 1,194.50 Food For Breakfast With Santa/12/04 001-4601-4308 292.60 Page: 7 1 vchlist Check Register Page: 8 12/09/2004 4:49:20PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38830 12/9/2004 12962 MCDONALDS (Continued) Total: 292.60 38831 12/9/2004 09715 NEW PIG CORPORATION 4277445-00 Chemical Storage Container/Nov 04 715-4206-4309 499.73 • Total : 499.73 38832 12/9/2004 10098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 269424317-03 Cell Phone Usage/11/2-12/01/04 001-2101-4304 1,063.28 Total : 1,063.28 38833 12/9/2004 12795 OFFICE TEAM 12304792 Temp SErvices/11/22-11/25/04 001-4601-4201 816.00 Total : 816.00 38834 12/9/2004 11314 PALM SPRINGS FOLLIES, THE 4601-04003 Deposit 2005 Excursion/4/30/05 001-4601-4201 250.00 Total : 250.00 38835 12/9/2004 00363 PEP BOYS 08140105929 Auto Parts/Nov 04 715-2101-4311 9.47 Total : 9.47 .8836 12/9/2004 03910 PORTERS ALIGNMENT & BRAKE S 12973 Front End Alignment/11/04 715-2101-4311 50.00 Total : 50.00 38837 12/9/2004 12924 SAPHONY 12/02/04 Temporary Website Maint/11/04 715-1206-4201 846.00 Total : 846.00 38838 12/9/2004 12970 SCPMA-HR 1203-16493 2005 Membership Dues/M. Earl 001-1203-4315 40.00 Total : 40.00 38839 12/9/2004 09656 SHRED IT CALIFORNIA 333364701 Shredding Services/12/04 001-2101-4201 129.50 Total : 129.50 Page: 8 c6 vchlist Check Register Page: 9 12/09/2004 4:49:20PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38840 12/9/2004 12581 SIBBALD, JONATHAN 2101-16514 MILEAGE REIMBURSMENT/10/4-11/1/04/POST 001-2101-4312 222.69 Total : 222.69 38841 12/9/2004 11831 SIR SPEEDY 10933 Copy & Bind/Cip02-108/11/04 001-4202-4201 52.74 • 10934 Copies of Specs/CIP02-612/Comb Binding 001-4202-4201 59.51 Total : 112.25 38842 12/9/2004 00114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 0001263 Program Supplies/11/04 001-4601-4308 97.04 0001772 Jail Supplies/Nov 04 001-2101-4306 83.86 0097491 Cleaning Supplies/11/04 001-4204-4309 ' 113.93 0098157 Jail Supplies/11/04 001-2101-4306 74.27 Total : 369.10 38843 12/9/2004 11471 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY 0060844 MANHOLE COVERS & FRAMES 160-8409-4201 2,435.63 0061137 Manhole Cover & Frames 160-8409-4201 2,706.25 . Total : 5,141.88 38844 12/9/2004 08812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC C 200405179 2 Portable Radio, Microphones & Case 150-2113-5402 4,301.75 Total : 4,301.75 38845 12/9/2004 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C 2-01-414-107 Electric Billing/Nov 04 001-4204-4303 4,254.37 2-01-414-215 Electric Billing/Nov 04 001-6101-4303 2,547.27 2-01-414-374 Electric Billing /Nov 04 105-2601-4303 34.47 Page: 9 vchlist Check Register Page: 10 12/09/2004 4:49:20PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38845 12/9/2004 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C (Continued) 2-01-414-399 Electric Billing/Nov 04 160-3102-4303 • 2-01-414-428 Electric Billing /Nov 04 105-2601-4303 2-01-414-510 Electric Billing/Nov 04 001-3104-4303 38846 12/9/2004 00146 SPARKLETTS 0566566-61 Water Dispenser Rental/Nov 04 001-2201-4309 38847 12/9/2004 10412 STERICYCLE 0003035505 Medical Waste Removal/11/04 001-2101-4201 38848 12/9/2004 06409 SULLY -MILLER CONTRACTING CO. 58455 Asphalt And Emulsion/11/04 001-3104-4309 .38849 12/9/2004 12846 TAM O'SHANTER INN 4601-04005 Excursion/12/11/04 001-4601-4201 38850 12/9/2004 00123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE 11/30/04 Hardware Purchases/11/04 001-4601-4309 105-2601-4309 715-4206-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2201-4309 001-4204-4309 001-2021 001-2022 38851 12/9/2004 08207 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 2004110296 Underground Service Alert/Nov 04 80.79 262.85 997.72 Total : 8,177.47 3.75 Total : 3.75 • 109.21 Total : 109.21 171.30 Total : 171.30 247.23 Total : 247.23 Total : 103.19 150.37 33.14 167.25 115.44 215.40 87.20 -87.20 784.79 Page: 10 �D vchlist Check Register Page: 11 12/09/2004 4:49:20PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38851 12/9/2004 08207 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (Continued) 160-3102-4201 37.80 Total : 37.80 396.97 Total : 396.97 24.61 Total : 24.61 24.61 Total : 24.61 26,949.51 Total : 26,949.51 1,600.00 Total : 1,600.00 160.58 Total : 160.58 4,895.83 Total : 4,895.83 112.86 Total : 112.86 38852 12/9/2004 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 310 UHO-3618 T-1 Circuit/11/22-12/22/04 001-2101-4304 • 38853 12/9/2004 12969 WALTER, VIRGINIA 1202-16499 2004 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 38854 12/9/2004 05990 WILMARTH, LYLE 1202-16498 2004 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 38855 12/9/2004 06098 WONDRIES FLEET DIVISION F7426 2004 EXPEDITION 715-2101-5403 38856 12/9/2004 10484 WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION, RAY 1141-15133 Work Guarantee Deposit Refund/10017 001-2110 457 12/9/2004 00135 XEROX CORPORATION 006539620 Copier Maint/Nov 04 715-2101-4201 38858 12/9/2004 12957 YEO FAIA ARCHITECT, INC., RON 04-109-1 430638953 11/1/2004 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 09790459003 CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT/PIER/10/04 301-8630-4201 Gas billing/9-16 to 10-15-04 001-4204-4303 430638954 11/1/2004 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 10210459003 Gas billing/9-16 to 10-15-04 001-4204-4303 41.29 Page: 11 vchlist 12/09/2004 4:49:20PM Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 12 Bank code : Voucher boa Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 430638954 432039655 • 432112198 432112272 432112273 • 11/1/2004 00170 11/15/2004 00170 11/17/2004 00170 11/17/2004 00170 11/17/2004 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. (Continued) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 11540469001 SOUTHERN SOUTHERN SOUTHERN boa 74 Vouchers for bank code : 74 Vouchers in this report CALIFORNIA GAS CO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 01100457009 13910446007 14120446001 Gas billing/9-29 to 10-28-04 001-4204-4303 Gas billing/10-5 to 11-3-04 001-4204-4303 Gas billing/10-5 to 11-3-04 001-4204-4303 Gas billing/10-5 to 11-3-04 001-4204-4303 Total : Total : Total : Total : 41.29 54.05 54.05 47.22 47.22 20.44 20.44 15.48 Total : 15.48 Bank total : 433,877.39 433,877.39 Total vouchers : Page: 12 ), vchlist Check Register Page: 1 12/16/2004 3:13:OOPM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38859 12/16/2004 05817 ACCELA INC. PA36580 ACCELA SOFTWARE SUPPORT 001-4201-4201 5,370.29 Total : 5,370.29 38860 _ 12/16/2004 12963 ADAMS, TODD L, 4601-04008 Theatre Lighting Technician • 001-4601-4201 567.19 Total : 567.19 38861 12/16/2004 12745 AMERICAN BINDING PRODUCTS 20493 LAMINATING POUCHES 001-4201-4305 116.99 001-4202-4305 8.85 Total : 125.84 38862 12/16/2004 05179 AT&T 055-354-2649 Finance Cashier Fax Line - 11/04 110-1204-4304 38863 12/16/2004 08884 BUDGET RENT A CAR 1204-16525 Citation Refund # 1404006299 110-3302 38864 12/16/2004 07109 BURT, ADAM 4601-04015 Instructor Pymnt Class # 9295 & 9298 001-4601-4221 38865 12/16/2004 00602 CA PARKS AND RECREATION, INC. 103530 Membership Dues -S. Donahue 001-4601-4315 Total : Total : Total : Total : 38866 12/16/2004 12622 CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURING 120507 COMMAND CAR COMPUTER CONSULT/9/04 153-2106-5402 Total : 38867 12/16/2004 00262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 52518 NAME PLATES -PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSIO 001-4202-4305 52544 Signs for Jail 001-2101-4305 82.76 82.76 35.00 35.00 735.00 735.00 130.00 130.00 4,287.50 4,287.50 54.12 99.38 Page: 1 I1 vchlist Check Register Page: ' 2 12/16/2004 3:13:OOPM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38867 12/16/2004 00262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 38868 12/16/2004 12230 CALIFORNIA OVERNIGHT • (Continued) 4543737 38869 12/16/2004 00016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 4286211111-1 38870 12/16/2004 12317 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 267566 38871 12/16/2004 01616 CALPELRA 1203-16538 48872 12/16/2004 10838 CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 3023732 4601-04016 38873 12/16/2004 06307 CHASE, MARGARET 38874 12/16/2004 00634 CHEVRON AND TEXACO CARD SE 789819208841 38875 12/16/2004 05595 COACH USA Total : 153.50 COURIER SERVICE - NOV 04 301-8630-4201 23.94 309-8104-4201 13.06 001-4202-4201 13.06 Total : 50.06 Water Service :10/15 -11/11/04 105-2601-4303 1,232.41 001-6101-4303 2,788.83 001-4204-4303 669.41 109-3304-4303 80.19 Total : 4,770.84 POLICE VEST/REFLECTIVE STRIP 150-2113-5401 516.35 Total : 516.35 2005 Membership Dues - M. Earl 001-1203-4315 255.00 Total : 255.00 Copier Maintenance - Nov 04 715-1208-4201 455.10 Total : 455.10 Instructor Pymnt Class # 9142 & 9145 001-4601-4221 462.00 Total : 462.00 Gas Card Purchases - Nov 04 715-2101-4310 217.55 Total : 217.55 109000 Transport/Glendale Ctr.Theatre Excursion 145-3409-4201 557.69 Page: 2 1'-k vchlist Check Register Page: 3 12/16/2004 3:13:OOPM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38875 12/16/2004 05595 COACH USA (Continued) Total : 557.69 38876 12/16/2004 08070 CONCERNED WOMEN IN BUSINE 203013 MEDICARE CLAIM FORMS 001-1202-4305 52.95 Total : 52.95 477 12/16/2004 07809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 56863505 Office Supplies 001-1208-4305 181.73 56978911 Office Supplies 001-1208-4305 8.72 56978912 Office Supplies 001-1208-4305 171.12 56978914 Office Supplies 001-1208-4305 8.99 57066819 Office Supplies 001-1208-4305 31.31 57141095 Office Supplies 001-1208-4305 87.26 57141096 Office Supplies 001-1208-4305 11.95 Total : 501.08 38878 12/16/2004 12856 CYGANY, INC. 2411 • 38879 12/16/2004 06100 DATA VAULT 501-62111 38880 12/16/2004 11398 DEBILIO DISTRIBUTORS,INC 165622 38881 12/16/2004 00364 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 499396 DOG BAGS FOR GREENBELT DISPENSERS 001-6101-4309 808.31 Total : 808.31 Off Site Storage - 11/04 715-1206-4201 198.33 Total : 198.33 Prisoners Meals - Dec 04 001-2101-4306 289.56 Total : 289.56 Fingerprinting Pre Employment - Nov 04 001-1203-4201 96.00 Page: 3 15 vchlist Check Register Page: 4 12/16/2004 3:13:00PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38881 12/16/2004 00364 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 38882 12/16/2004 12446 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY • 38883 12/16/2004 12903 DIVIRGILIO, DANAY 38884 12/16/2004 00181 EASY READER 38885 12/16/2004 11034 EKLUND'S BLAST OFF 38886 12/16/2004 01294 (Continued) 397642 4601-04013 120604 3825-NOV EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICES INC. 1700-112B 1700-116A 1703-117 1704-112 1705-112 1706-114 1707-112 1861-052 1884-039 Safety Equipment for City Yard - 11/04 001-4204-4321 Instructor Pymnt Class # 9305 001-4601-4221 Legal Ads - Nov 04 001-1121-4323 Total : 96.00 115.40 Total : 115.40 Total : 136.50 1,659.48 Total : 1,659.48 DOWNTOWN STEAM CLEANING-NOV 04 109-3301-4201 109-3304-4201 11/04 Janitorial 001-4204-4201 11/04 Janitorial 001-4204-4201 11/04 Janitorial 001-4204-4201 11/04 Janitorial 001-4204-4201 11/04 Janitorial 001-4204-4201 11/04 Janitorial 001-4204-4201 11/04 Janitorial 001-4204-4201 11/04 Janitorial 001-4204-4201 11/04 Janitorial 001-4204-4201 Services - Jail Service - Police Dept. Services - City Hall Services - Base III Service - Clark Bldg. Service -Comm Ctr. Services - City Yard Services -Bowling Green Services -So. Park Total : 136.50 2,345.00 225.00 2,570.00 750.00 1,200.00 1,245.00 290.00 365.00 4,160.00 325.00 195.00 55.00 Page: 4 16 vchlist Check Register Page: 5 12/16/2004 3:13:OOPM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38886 12/16/2004 01294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICES INC. (Continued) Total : 8,585.00 38887 12/16/2004 01962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 7-893-73323 Express Mail - Nov 04 001-4202-4201 87.05 001-3104-4201 40.96 Total : 128.01 4188 12/16/2004 06293 FEDEX KINKO'S INC. 101600119719 Posterboard for Holiday Events 001-4601-4305 37000021267 Signs for AYSO Parking 001-4601-4308 38889 12/16/2004 12976 GLAVE, COREY 1204-16523 Citation Refund # 1504005551 110-3302 Total : Total : 86.58 10.83 97.41 65.00 65.00 38890 12/16/2004 12748 GREENDALE, CHAD 4601-04012 Umpire Fees - Nov 04 001-4601-4201 95.00 Total : 95.00 38891 12/16/2004 10740 HAZELRIGG RISK MANAGEMENT S 2001634 Claims Admin Fees - 3rd. Quarter 705-1217-4201 Total : 092 12/16/2004 04108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, IN 12132004 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS - 12/03 & 12/10/04 705-1217-4324 38893 12/16/2004 00322 HERMOSA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 13 Emergency Vet Services / Nov 04 110-3302-4201 14 Emergency Vet Service - Dec 04 110-3302-4201 Total : 7,161.25 7,161.25 23,056.86 23,056.86 35.00 35.00 Total : 70.00 38894 12/16/2004 12977 HOLMBERG, MEGAN K 1204-16528 Citation Refund # 1504003435 110-3302 5.00 Page: 5 vchlist Check Register Page: 6 12/16/2004 3:13:OOPM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38894 12/16/2004 12977 HOLMBERG, MEGAN K 38895 12/16/2004 12243 IRVINE, CITY OF • 38896 12/16/2004 12978 KEALY CONSTRUCTION, PATRICK 38897 12/16/2004 12980 KIPLING RUTHERFORD-SAMESHIM 38898 12/16/2004 12975 KIRIK, KELCEY 38899 12/16/2004 07859 LACMTA .900 12/16/2004 12979 LAKE, AMANDA 38901 12/16/2004 10677 LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES 38902 12/16/2004 12974 MOURLOT, ROSENDO 38903 12/16/2004 10098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (Continued) 11/29/04 120416527 1204-16516 1204-16524 12040333 1204-16537 Nov 04 1204-16522 551834312 Total : 5.00 Mud Playground Excursions -6/20&30/04 001-4601-4201 320.00 Total : 320.00 Citation Refund # 1504009309 110-3302 30.00 Total : 30.00 Citation Refund # 1404006037 110-3302 35.00 Total : 35.00 Citation Refund # 0300066086 110-3302 55.00 Total : 55.00 Bus Pass Sales/Dec 04 145-3403-4251 192.00 Total : 192.00 Citation Refund/1304001918 110-3302 10.00 Total : 10.00 Staff Augmentation/11/1-12/06/2004 140-4707-4201 2,465.00 Total : 2,465.00 Citation Refund/1804007089 110-3302 20.00 Total : 20.00 CeII Phone Usage - Nov 04 715-1208-4201 .183.01 Total : 183.01 Page: 6 18 vchlist Check Register Page: 7 12/16/2004 3:13:OOPM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38904 12/16/2004 09182 NORTH STAR GRAPHICS 2430 GRAPHICS KIT INSTALLED/FORD EXPEDITIO 715-2101-4311 351.81 Total : 351.81 38905 12/16/2004 04142 OFFICE DEPOT 878114681000 Office Supplies 001-2101-4305 28.19 • 878114781000 Office Supplies 001-2201-4305 70.19 Total : 98.38 38906 12/16/2004 07619 PREMIER LIGHTING & PROD. 0012430 -IN LIGHTS FOR COMM CTR THEATRE 001-4601-5401 1,044.61 Total : 1,044.61 38907 12/16/2004 08837 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF 93143 Fuel Purchases - Oct 04 715-2201-4310 715-3302-4310 715-4204-4310 715-4201-4310 715-4202-4310 93152 FUEL PURCHASES - SEP & OCT 04 715-2201-4310 715-3302-4310 715-4204-4310 • 715-4202-4310 715-4201-4310 38908 12/16/2004 03726 RUSHER AIR CONDITIONING 102306 38909 12/16/2004 12981 SANGI, SALVATORE 1204-165.02 38910 12/16/2004 08467 SARNOFF, BRET L. 1204-16526 Total : AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS/PK'STRUCTURE 109-3304-4201 Citation Refund/Admin Hearing 110-3302 Citation Refund/1104003630 110-3302 Total : Total : 627.41 29.97 35.27 43.88 10.34 1,067.13 64.90 51.77 5.51 45.12 1,981.30 928.36 928.36 35.00 1 35.00 10.00 Page: 7 19 vchlist Check Register Page: 8 12/16/2004 3:13:OOPM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38910 12/16/2004 08467 SARNOFF, BRET L. (Continued) Total : 10.00 38911 12/16/2004 12034 SHAWNAN 35-10 SEWER REPAIR/ CIP 00-411 • 160-8411-4201 1,975.00 Total : 1,975.00 38912 12/16/2004 10532 SOUTH BAY FORD 53292 Auto Parts Purchase - Dec 04 715-2101-4311 107.15 53299 Auto Parts Purchase - Dec 04 715-2201-4311 122.85 53505 Auto Parts Purchase - Dec 04 715-2101-4311 55.89 83920 Auto Parts Purchase - Dec 04 715-2201-4311 18.52 FXCB812223 Auto Repairs - 01 Crown Victoria - 12/04 715-2101-4311 288.00 Total : 592.41 38913 12/16/2004 08812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC C 200405175 Radio Antennas For Command Console 150-2113-5401 200405199 RADIO CHARGING UNITS INSTALLED • 150-2113-5401 150-2113-5401 38914 12/16/2004 00146 SPARKLETTS 0721846-61 Drinking Water 001-4601-4305 38915 12/16/2004 12497 SUOR, DAVID 4601-04014 Umpire Fees/4/2004 001-4601-4201 38916 12/16/2004 11102 TORRANCE WHOLESALE NURSER 399259 Plants for Comm Ctr. - 11/04 001-6101-4309 399260 Plants for Comm Ctr. -11/04 001-6101-4309 115.83 606.28 51.51 Total : 773.62 55.69 Total : 55.69 315.00 Total : 315.00 243.57 284.16 Page: 8 ad vchlist Check Register Page: 9 12/16/2004 3:13:OOPM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38916 12/16/2004 11102 TORRANCE WHOLESALE NURSER (Continued) 399261 1117 12/16/2004 11209 UC REGENTS 399264 04120106 38918 12/16/2004 12899 WESTERN STATES INFORMATION 0003 Plants for Comm. Ctr. -11/04 001-6101-4309 186.74 Plants for South Park - 11/04 001-6101-4309 292.28 Total : 1,006.75 CONTINUING EDUCATION -12/04 001-2201-4201 1,736.44 Total : 1,736.44 E -NEWSLETTER SERVICES 001-1101-4319 500.00 Total : 500.00 38919 12/16/2004 01206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 72062 BRITESIDE LETTERS/PEDESTRIAN CROSSIN 001-3104-4309 920.13 Total : 920.13 61 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 80,097.32 Total vouchers : 80,097.32 61 Vouchers in this report • Page: 9 aI vchlist Check Register Page: 1 12/20/2004 7:15:15AM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38920 12/20/2004 00243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACC 12152004 Payroll/12-1 to 12-15-04 001-1103 359,745.52 4111 105-1103 7,488.95 109-1103 1,532.18 110-1103 38,067.48 117-1103 853.90 122-1103 372.18 145-1103 1,483.34 152-1103 38.62 156-1103 2,885.17 160-1103 8,777.04 170-1103 3,179.69 301-1103 3,438.22 705-1103 3,454.74 715-1103 8,962.53 Total : 440,279.56 1 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 440,279.56 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 440,279.56 • Page: 1 2-2 vchlist Check Register Page: 1 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38921 12/23/2004 12142 ADAM'S PREMIUM CAR CARE 20266 AUTO CLEANING SUPPLIES 001-2201-4309 78.35 Total : 78.35 481922 12/23/2004 12396 ADELPHIA 821117899000 Air Traffic Monitoring/12/19-1/18/05 715-1206-4201 136.80 Total : 136.80 38923 12/23/2004 11437 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CO -O 178371 TAXI VOUCHER PROGRAM/NOV 04 145-3404-4201 Total : 38924 12/23/2004 06827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 3267 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES/11/28-12/11/04 001-2102-4201 Total : 3,962.40 3,962.40 3,414.11 3,414.11 38925 12/23/2004 12697 ALLEN, CHRISTOPHER IVAN 4601-04025 Instructor Payment/#9226 001-4601-4221 1,960.00 4601-04026 Equipment Fee Reimbursed Class 9853 001-4601-4221 45.00 Total : 2,005.00 38926 12/23/2004 08482 BOUND TREE MEDICAL,LLC 50009988 Medical Supplies/11/04 • 50010006 001-2201-4309 271.46 Medical Supplies/11/04 001-2201-4309 32.28 50012489 Medical Supplies/12/04 001-2201-4309 13.03 50012580 Medical Supplies/12/04 001-2201-4309 151.30 50017045 Medical Supplies/12/04 001-2201-4309 109.01 Total : 577.08 38927 12/23/2004 12504 CACE 4201-16558 2005 Membership Dues/Bob Rollins 001-4201-4315 40.00 Page: 1 a3 vchlist Check Register Page: 2 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM 'CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38927 12/23/2004 12504 CAGE (Continued) Total: 40.00 38928 12/23/2004 00262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 52533 DATE STAMP FOR COMM CTR. • 001-4601-4305 321.50 Total: 321.50 38929 12/23/2004 12848 CAMPBELL, TOM 102190 Rental Deposit Refund 001-2111 500.00 Total : 500.00 38930 12/23/2004 09632 CDWG QA10092 ANTI VIRUS LICENSES/POLICE 715-2101-4201 458.68 Total : 458.68 38931 12/23/2004 05935 CLEAN STREET 41643 DOWNTOWN AREA CLEANING/04/05 109-3301-4201 3,039.27 001-6101-4201 8,217.39 41644 CITY WIDE STREET CLEANING/04/05 001-3104-4201 15,929.42 Total : 27,186.08 38932 12/23/2004 04715 COLEN AND LEE 1978 Liability Administration/Oct & Nov 04 • 705-1209-4324 2,000.00 Total : 2,000.00 38933 12/23/2004 12998 COMFORT SUITES 913 Lodging/James Smith 001-2101-4317 496.80 9210-16559 Lodging/James Smith/1-10-14 & 1/17-21 001-2101-4312 993.60 Total : 1,490.40 38934 12/23/2004 11497 CONSTRUCTION INSTITUTE 7 2005 Construction Membership/Malabanan 001-4202-4315 100.00 Total : 100.00 38935 12/23/2004 02173 COOK, NANCY 2101-16536 Reimbursement / Glasses Broken on Duty 001-2101-4314 462.00 Page: 2 ay vchlist 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Check Register Page: 3 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38935 12/23/2004 02173 COOK, NANCY (Continued) Total : 462.00 38936 12/23/2004 07809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 57141092 Office Supplies/12/04 001-1208-4305 170.75 57141093 Office Supplies/12/04 001-1208-4305 8.28 • 57141094 Office Supplies/12/04 001-1208-4305 21.91 57254411 Office Supplies/12/04 001-1208-4305 82.39 57254412 Office Supplies/12/04 001-1208-4305 113.90 57311838 Office Supplies/12/04 001-1208-4305 4.20 Total : 401.43 38937 12/23/2004 12997 COSMO, FLYNN 102189 Deposit Refund 001-2111 500.00 Total : 500.00 38938 12/23/2004 00642 DAILY BREEZE, THE 39220500 Employment Ads/Nov 04 001-1203-4201 607.16 Total : 607.16 039 12/23/2004 04689 DATA TICKET, INC. 10833 DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/NOV 04 110-1204-4201 264.11 Total : 264.11 38940 12/23/2004 00154 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & Oct2004 Shelter Services/Oct 04 110-3302-4251 506.62 Total : 506.62 38941 12/23/2004 11449 DEWEY PEST CONTROL 2197590 Rodent Abatement/6`h Street Storage 001-4204-4201 50.00 Total : 50.00 38942 12/23/2004 00726 DFM ASSOCIATES 1121-16551 2005 Calif Elections Code Page: 3 as vchlist Check Register Page: 4 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38942 12/23/2004 00726 DFM ASSOCIATES (Continued) 001-1121-4201 46.12 Total : 46.12 *943 12/23/2004 12747 DICKSON, DAN 4601-04024 Umpire Fees/12/01/04 001-4601-4201 95.00 Total : 95.00 38944 12/23/2004 10909 DIVERSIFIED RISK INSURANCE 4601-04019 Tulip Insurance/Nov 04 001-3897 141.49 Total : 141.49 38945 12/23/2004 12883 ECOLINE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 21005 1 CASE OF ENGINE DEGREASER 715-4206-4309 303.19 Total : 303.19 38946 12/23/2004 07853 EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING & EQUIP 6547 CLEAN & VIDEO CITY SEWER YSTEM 160-3102-4201 10,613.70 Total : 10,613.70 38947 12/23/2004 05509 ESCALANTE, RICK 4601-04021 Instructor Payment/#9242 & 9246 001-4601-4221 336.00 • Total : 336.00 38948 12/23/2004 06344 FIRST CALL STAFFING SERVICES 0709-89975 TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES FOR P.W. COMMI 001-4202-4201 95.03 Total : 95.03 38949 12/23/2004 05125 GHASSEMI PETTY CASH, MARIA 1141-16580 Petty Cash Reimbursements/11/22-12/20 Page: 4 acp vchlist 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 5 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38949 12/23/2004 05125 GHASSEMI PETTY CASH, MARIA (Continued) 38950 12/23/2004 12995 GOMEZ, TRICIA ,8951 12/23/2004 12773 HARRIS, CHERI L. 102137 20041207 001-1101-4305 4.95 001-1201-4317 40.00 001-1203-4201 88.11 001-1203-4305 30.98 001-2101-4305 9.42 001-2101-4317 63.00 001-2201-4309 16.24 001-4101-4305 47.45 001-4201-4305 25.35 001-4202-4305 7.39 001-4202-4317 66.00 001-4601-4308 319.66 110-1204-4317 22.69 110-3302-4305 9.19 001-2201-4317 5.00 001-1121-4317 48.00 Total : 803.43 Deposit Refund 001-2111 Total : PK & Rec. Minutes Transcriptions/12/07/04 001-4601-4305 38952 12/23/2004 04108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, IN 12/20/04 Worker's Comp Claims/12/13-12/17/04 705-1217-4324 38953 12/23/2004 11933 HERCULES INDUSTRIES, INC. 38459 KEYS FOR CITYWIDE PADLOCKS 001-3104-4309 Total : Total : Total : 225.00 225.00 94.50 94.50 20,737.89 20,737.89 356.96 356.96 38954 12/23/2004 12151 JAHNG, CHRISTOPHER Y. 4601-04022 Instructor Payment/9253 & 9254 001-4601-4221 430.50 Page: 5 a�► vchlist Check Register Page: 6 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38954 12/23/2004 12151 JAHNG, CHRISTOPHER Y. (Continued) Total : 430.50 38955 12/23/2004 04908 JAMESTOWN PRESS 6133 Business Cards/Lewis, Marinella, • 6173 001-1208-4305 64.95 Business Cards/ Lewis 001-1208-4305 32.48 Total : 97.43 38956 12/23/2004 12996 JOHNSON, HAROLD 102140 102141 Rental Deposit Refund 001-2111 Rental Deposit Refund 001-2111 25.01 96.26 Total : 121.27 38957 12/23/2004 12886 L AND S PAINTING 2049 COMM CTR. THEATRE LOBBY PAINTING 001-4204-4201 2,600.00 Total : 2,600.00 38958 12/23/2004 08701 L.A. COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT C0003368 96/97 Lifeguard & Beach Maint/Yr 4 Of 5 109-3307-4251 55,000.00 Total : 55,000.00 08959 12/23/2004 00842 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 25290 2005 City Membership Dues 001-1101-4315 5,629.00 Total : 5,629.00 38960 12/23/2004 00167 LEARNED LUMBER B931681 Patching Materials 001-4204-4309 10.20 Total : 10.20 38961 12/23/2004 10045 MAIN STREET TOURS 32156 Excursion Transportation/11/12/04 001-4601-4201 2,088.00 32157 Excursion Transportation/11/12/04 145-3409-4201 500.00 Total : 2,588.00 38962 12/23/2004 00183 MANHATTAN BEACH, CITY OF 16-00941 Area G VHF Radio Cache/Strike Team 001-2201-5401 227.48 Page: 6 ab vchlist Check Register Page: 7 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38962 12/23/2004 00183 MANHATTAN BEACH, CITY OF (Continued) Total : 227.48 38963 12/23/2004 06514 MAXIMUS, INC. 1010134 MANDATED COST REPORTING 2ND QTR 001-1202-4201 975.00 Total : 975.00 .64 12/23/2004 10681 MAYNOR, DONALD H. DHM 2347 LEGAL SERVICES RE: UUT AUDIT/OCT -DEC 0 001-1202-4201 1,250.00 Total : 1,250.00 38965 12/23/2004 01911 MEDICAL INSTITUTE 503281 EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS/11/9-11/30/04 001-1203-4320 361.00 Total : 361.00 38966 12/23/2004 10608 MTC ENGINEERING INC. 411903 Field Observation & Density Test 301-8630-4201 4,040.50 Total : 4,040.50 38967 12/23/2004 10098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 959814312-03 CeII Phone Usage - Nov 04 001-4202-4304 650.01 Total : 650.01 38968 12/23/2004 00220 NJP SPORTS, INC. 95876 VOLLEYBALL NETS AND STRAPS 001-6101-4309 983.01 Total : 983.01 4111t69 12/23/2004 08962 NORLAB, INC. 56137 TRACING DYE FOR SEWERS 160-3102-4309 189.60 Total : 189.60 38970 12/23/2004 12795 OFFICE TEAM 12341102 Temporary Services - W/E 12/03/04 001-4601-4201 826.20 12389543 Temp Services/12/6-12/9/04 001-4601-4201 816:00 Total : 1,642.20 38971 12/23/2004 00519 PAK WEST PAPER & PACKAGING 622984 Trash Can Bags for Recycle Program 001-6101-4309 187.70 Page: 7 a9 vchlist Check Register Page: 8 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor 38971 12/23/2004 00519 38972 12/23/2004 11635 • 38973 12/23/2004 06909 38974 12/23/2004 12006 38975 12/23/2004 10970 38976 12/23/2004 03726 Invoice Description/Account Amount PAK WEST PAPER & PACKAGING (Continued) PRESS, BRIAN 102133 PRYOR, W.T. RAMIREZ, RAQUEL ROBERTS, FREDERICK RUSHER AIR CONDITIONING 38977 12/23/2004 03353 S.B.C.U. VISA 1202-16563 4601-04020 4601-04023 101698 101933 Rental Deposit Refund 001-2111 2004 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 Instructor Payment/#9160 001-4601-4221 Umpire Fees/Sept & Nov 04 001-4601-4201 Air Cond. Repairs at Pkq. Structure 109-3304-4201 Air Cond. Repairs at Pkg. Structure 109-3304-4201 3509 Lodging/Earl/11/10-11/12/04 001-1203-4317 001-2201-4317 3640 Lodging/Marks/11/15-11/18/04 001-2201-4317 4816 Employment Ads/Admin Assistant/Clerk 001-1203-4201 5542 Gas Purchase/Dec 04 001-2201-4317 5814 Council Interview/Cable Board Applicants 001-1101-4305 7011 LODGING MARKS/1129-12/01/04 001-2201-4317 Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : 187.70 500.00 500.00 24.61 24.61 390.00 390.00 950.00 950.00 719.80 199.00 918.80 445.98 45.00 379.68 420.00 27.60 43.38 326.62 Page: 8 vchlist Check Register Page: 9 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38977 12/23/2004 03353 S.B.C.U. VISA 38978 12/23/2004 00321 SBC • 38979 12/23/2004 09656 SHRED IT CALIFORNIA 9980 12/23/2004 09268 SIGNS 4 SUCCESS 38981 . 12/23/2004 06304 SIMPSON, ROBERT 38982 12/23/2004 12619 SMITH, OFFICER J.R. (Continued) 7996 248134945446 331 254-6071 333 267-6155 333267-6160 333267-6161 3332676164 3332676165 333364702 16731 16548 2101-16560 913 Employment Ad/Administrative Assistant 001-1203-4201 Circuit Billing/Dec 04 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/Dec 04 001-2101-4304 T-1 Circuit Billing/Dec 04 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/Dec 04 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/Dec 04 001-2101-4304 Computer Hook-Ups/Dec 04 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/Dec 04 001-2101-4304 Shredding Services - Dec 04 001-2101-4201 NEW YEAR'S EVE BANNER 001-4601-4308 2004 Assessment Tax Rebate 105-3105 Meals/Post Class/1/10-1/21/04 001-2101-4312 Meals/1/3-1/7/2005 001-2101-4317 Total : 3� 80.00 1,768.26 10.61 57.65 188.31 59.44 59.44 50.69 50.69 Total : 476.83 148.00 Total : 148.00 514.19 Total : 514.19 24.61 Total : 24.61 280.00 140.00 Page: 9 vchlist Check Register Page: 10 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38982 12/23/2004 12619 SMITH, OFFICER J.R. (Continued) Total : 420.00 38983 12/23/2004 09737 SOLYMOSI, MARIE 633298 Bee Removal/12/04 110-3302-4201 85.00 • 633299 Bee Removal/12/09/04 110-3302-4201 85.00 633300 Bee Removal/12/04 110-3302-4201 85.00 Total : 255.00 38984 12/23/2004 08812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC C 200405198 DISPATCH SERVICES/3RD QTR 001-2101-4251 77,600.00 110-3302-4251 9,700.00 001-2201-4251 9,700.00 Total : 97,000.00 38985 12/23/2004 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C 2-00-989-691 Electric Billing -Nov 04 105-2601-4303 246.83 2-00-989-731 Electric Billing -Nov 04 105-2601-4303 10,181.77 2-01-836-745 Electric Billing -Nov 04 105-2601-4303 12.80 • 2-02-274-054 Electric Billing -Nov 04 001-6101-4303 16.10 2-08-629-366 Electric Billing -Nov 04 001-4204-4303 138.98 2-09-076-585 Electric Billing -Nov 04 105-2601-4303 71.45 2-10-947-982 Electric Billing -Nov 04 105-2601-4303 157.92 2-19-024-160 Electric Billing -Nov 04 001-6101-4303 232.84 2-20-128-482 Electric Billing -Nov 04 109-3304-4303 2,017.93 2-20-128-547 Electric Billing -Nov 2004 001-4204-403 32.39 Page: 10 31 vchlist Check Register Page: 11 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38985 12/23/2004 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C (Continued) 2-20-984-617 Electric Billing -Nov 04 105-2601-4303 29.04 2-20-984-636 Electric Billing -Nov 04 105-2601-4303 220.63 2-21-400-768 Electric Billing -Nov 04 •105-2601-4303 29.63 2-21-964-800 Electric Billing -Nov 04 105-2601-4303 31.59 2-22-267-066 Electric Billing -Nov 04 109-3304-4303 74.03 2-23-687-802 Electric Billing -Nov 04 001-3104-4303 104.83 2-26-686-593 Electric Billing -Nov 04 105-2601-4303 1,091.08 3-23-725-442 Electric Billing -Nov 04 001-4204-4303 2,858.24 Total : 17,548.08 38986 12/23/2004 12349 TAUSSIG & ASSOCIATES, INC, DA 4110228 ENGINEERING/BAYVIEW DRIVE/NOV 04 309-8104-4201 11,303.33 Total : 11,303.33 .987 12/23/2004 09822 TMT -PATHWAY 81116 CURB PAINT 001-3104-4309 974.25 Total : 974.25 38988 12/23/2004 00124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY S2475674.001 CITY HALL DRINKING FOUNTAIN 001-4204-4309 939.11 Total : 939.11 38989 12/23/2004 10155 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 546789 PLAZA PALMS FERTILIZATION 109-3301-4201 560.00 Total : 560.00 38990 12/23/2004 11035 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1263965122 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE/NOV 04 Page: 11 33 vchlist Check Register Page: 12 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38990 12/23/2004 11035 TRUGREEN LANDCARE (Continued) 001-6101-4201 14,465.67 105-2601-4201 675.00 . 1263965123 109-3301-4201 250.00 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 105-2601-4201 2,500.00 109-3301-4201 900.00 Total : 18,790.67 38991 12/23/2004 08097 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 18113514 Safekeeping Fees for November 2004 001-1141-4201 291.67 Total : 291.67 38992 12/23/2004 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 197-3683 Phone Charges/Nov 04 715-1206-4304 247.86 110-3302-4304 63.91 001-2101-4304 1,271.05 001-4204-4321 56.67 001-2201-4304 255.00 001-4601-4304 153.92 001-4201-4304 103.97 109-3304-4304 30.95 • 110-1204-4304 31.05 001-4202-4304 127.99 310-372-6373 Fax Line / Personnel - Dec 04 001-1203-4304 32.98 406-2421 Phone Charges/Dec 04 001-2101-4304 38.21 Total : 2,413.56 38993 12/23/2004 01206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 0071922 71660 Street Signs & Supplies/11/04 001-3104-4309 275.50 Street Signs Purchase - Nov 04 001-3104-4309 143.88 Total : 419.38 73 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 312,523.28 Page: 12 3L 1. vchlist 12/23/2004 3:42:30PM Check Register Page: 13 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher o Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 73 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 312,523.28 Page: 13 35 vchlist Check Register Page: 1 12/30/2004 3:27:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 38994 12/30/2004 09944 ACE PARTY RENTS 4601-04030 Tent Rental/New Year's Eve Event 109-3301-4319 478.35 Total : 478.35 38995 12/30/2004 05179 AT&T 372-6373 Long Distance Charges/Nov 04 001-1203-4304 23.34 Total : 23.34 38996 12/30/2004 10547 CBM CONSULTING, INC. 289001 , DESIGN & ENGINEERING/CIP NOV 04 301-8115-4201 5,757.50 Total : 5,757.50 38997 12/30/2004 09632 CDWG PY50483 Hard Copy of Anti Virus Software 715-2101-5403 29.89 Total : 29.89 38998 12/30/2004 00041 COPELAND, VIKI 1202-16581 EXPENSE REIMBURSE/LEAGUE OF CA CITIES 001-1202-4317 402.61 Total : 402.61 38999 12/30/2004 01390 DAPPER TIRE CO. 360656 Tire Purchase/Dec 04 • 360657 715-2101-4311 152.19 TIRE PURCHASE/DEC 04 715-2101-4311 152.19 Total : 304.38 39000 12/30/2004 13005 EWART, GLEN 2201-16576 Reimburse For Building Materials/Lockers 180-8610-4201 250.51 Total : 250.51 39001 12/30/2004 10668 EXXON MOBIL FLEET/GECC, ACCT 6392529 Gas Card Purchases/11/10-12/09/04 Page: 1 3� vchlist Check Register Page: 2 12/30/2004 3:27:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 39001 12/30/2004 10668 EXXON MOBIL FLEET/GECC, ACCT (Continued) • 715-2101-4310 3,905.03 715-2201-4310 297.44 715-4201-4310 127.18 715-4202-4310 81.91 715-6101-4310 268.78 715-3302-4310 245.97 715-3104-4310 466.47 715-4601-4310 130.45 715-2601-4310 499.47 001-1250 38.27 Total : 6,060.97 39002 12/30/2004 01320 GALLS/LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO 657364 Uniform Shirts/Sellan & Brunn 001-2101-4314 156.15 Total : 156.15 39003 12/30/2004 08717 GFOA R2459207 REGISTRATION FEE - V. COPELAND 001-1202-4317 80.00 Total : 80.00 39004 12/30/2004 02336 HALL, MARCIA 1204-16564 Reimburse Travel Expenses/11/9-11/04 110-1204-4317 682.70 Total : 682.70 005 12/30/2004 02102 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 032060115 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT/PIER PHASE 001-8630-4201 29,595.00 032060116 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT/PIER PHASE 001-8630-4201 28,627.69 Total : 58,222.69 39006 12/30/2004 04108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, IN 12272004 Worker's Comp Claims/12/22/04 705-1217-4324 18,030.34 Total : 18,030.34 39007 12/30/2004 01399 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 0189-361995 Paint/12/04 001-4204-4309 39.08 Page: 2 3-1 vchlist Check Register Page: 3 12/30/2004 3:27:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 39007 12/30/2004 01399 ICI,DULUX PAINT CENTERS (Continued) Total : 39.08 39008 12/30/2004 02458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECT 200057-00 Electrical Supplies/Dec 04 105-2601-4309 228.55 . 001-2021 4.30 001-2022 -4.30 Total : 228.55 39009 12/30/2004 10923 ISI TELEMANAGEMENT SOLUTION 6057443 Software Service Agreement/Call Acctq • 715-1206-4201 6057444 -IN Software Service Agreement/OSFEP 715-1206-4201 39010 12/30/2004 12852 J.C. CHANG & ASSOCIATES, INC. 04034-A Total : 758.00 420.00 1,178.00 DESIGN PLANS/ COMM. CTR ADA UPGRADES, 140-8626-4201 36,322.50 Total : 36,322.50 39011 12/30/2004 12481 LOWES 72085 1*1 CABINETS/2ND FLOOR/CITY HALL 001-8622-5602 Total : 1,531.91 1,531.91 09012 12/30/2004 13002 MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL 2101-16568 Tuition/Mccolgan 001-2101-4317 25.00 Total : 25.00 39013 12/30/2004 10324 MBIA MUNI SERVICES COMPANY UUT20000884 UUT COMPLIANCE SERVICES/2ND QRT 001-1202-4201 Total : 1,250.00 1,250.00 39014 12/30/2004 10098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 371554311 Cell Phone Usage/11/22-12/21/04 001-2201-4304 326.52 Total : 326.52 39015 12/30/2004 12933 NORBERTS ATHLETIC PRODUCTS 00412701 MATS FOR GYMNASTICS & KARATE CLASSE 001-4601-5401 2,097.31 Total : 2,097.31 Page: 3 vchlist Check Register Page: 4 12/30/2004 3:27:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 39016 12/30/2004 10139 PARKING CONCEPTS INC. lipp17 12/30/2004 12910 PIP PRINTING -284-1104 285 1104 OPERATING EXPENSES/PK STRUCTURE/NOV 109-3304-4231 OPERATION EXPENSES/LOT A /NOV 04 109-3305-4231 Total : 11426 COLOR COPIES OF MUTUAL AID RESPONSE f 001-2201-4305 39018 12/30/2004 03910 PORTERS ALIGNMENT & BRAKE S 13134 39019 12/30/2004 12681 POSITIVE SYSTEMS 39020 12/30/2004 01429 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION 415062 39021 12/30/2004 03726 RUSHER AIR CONDITIONING 101954 PSI -2728 • 39022 12/30/2004 03353 S.B.C.U. VISA 39023 12/30/2004 09656 SHRED IT CALIFORNIA 39024 12/30/2004 09955 SOUTH BAY PIPELINE 102738 5542 333364703 4202-16245 Front End Alignment/Dec 04 715-2101-4311 ORTHOFOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 001-4202-4201 Electronic Cable/11/04 001-2101-4305 Total : Total : Total : Total : AIR COND. REPAIR/ CITY HALL/10/04 001-4204-4201 EMERGENCY REPAIR -AIR COND. CITY HALL 001-4204-4201 Gas Purchase/Dec 04 715-2101-4310 Shredding Services/Dec 04 001-2101-4201 Total : Total : Total : 16,057.17 11,363.03 27,420.20 346.26 346.26 50.00 50.00 3,315.33 3,315.33 15.69 15.69 333.32 199.00 532.32 30.00 30.00 95.00 95.00 EMERGENCY MANHOLE REPAIRS 160-8409-4201 6,250.00 Page: 4 39 vchlist Check Register Page: 5 12/30/2004 3:27:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 39024 12/30/2004 09955 SOUTH BAY PIPELINE (Continued) Total : 6,250.00 39025 12/30/2004 09198 STONEBRIDGE PRODUCTIONS 4601-04028 12/31/04 Entertainment/Final Pmt 109-3301-4319 12,500.00 0 Total : 12,500.00 39026 12/30/2004 12984 SUDHAKAR COMPANY S04032-1 SLURRY SEAL FOR VALLEY DR. PKG AREA 301-8112-4201 2,000.00 Total : 2,000.00 39027 12/30/2004 04768 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE 18894 Printer Maintenance/Jan 05 715-1206-4201 619.52 Total : 619.52 39028 12/30/2004 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 310 167-1756 Phone Charges/Live Scan/12/16-1/16/04 001-2101-4304 263.50 310 175-8766 White Page Listing/12/16/04-12/16/2005 001-1203-4304 21.69 318-0200 Phone Charges/11/28-12/28/04 001-1121-4304 1.29 001-1132-4304 0.65 001-1141-4304 5.16 Ill . 001-1201-4304 5.48 001-1202-4304 12.58 001-1203-4304 8.06 001-1208-4304 0.65 001-2101-4304 97.74 001-2201-4304 41.29 001-4101-4304 5.81 001-4201-4304 9.36 001-4202-4304 65.16 001-4601-4304 37.10 110-1204-4304 6.45 110-3302-4304 17.42 715-1206-4304 8.39 PLO 0347 Circuit Billing/12/19-1/19/04 001-2101-4304 41.53 Page: 5 LD vchlist Check Register Page: 6 12/30/2004 3:27:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 39028 12/30/2004 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 39029 12/30/2004 09056 VERIZON ONLINE • 39030 12/30/2004 03209 VERIZON WIRELESS -LA 39031 12/30/2004 01206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 433518334 12/1/2004 00170 0518339 12/1/2004 00170 434916756 12/15/2004 00170 435618718 12/22/2004 00170 435618795 12/22/2004 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. (Continued) PLO -0346 63995490 68828001 73875834 1912314099 0071813 09790459003 10210459003 11540469001. 01100457009 13910446007 Circuit Billing/12/16-1/16/05 001-2101-4304 Internet Services/10/22-11/21/04 715-1206-4201 Internet Services/11/22-12/21/04 715-1206-4201 Internet Services/1/22-1/22/04 715-1206-4201 Cell Phone Billing/11/17-12/16/04 001-2101-4304 Post Caps For Signs/Nov 04 001-3104-4309 Gas Billing/10-15 to 11-16-04 001-4204-4303 Gas Billing/10-15 to 11-16-04 001-4204-4303 Gas Billing/10-28 to 12-01-04 001-4204-4303 Gas Billing/11-03 to 12-07-04 001-4204-4303 Gas Billing/11-3 to 12-7-04 Total : 41.53 690.84 893.00 893.00 893.00 Total : 2,679.00 235.70 Total : 235.70 22.08 Total : 22.08 155.99 Total : 155.99 46.23 Total : 46.23 121.36 Total : 121.36 106.14 Total : 106.14 Page: 6 L3 I vchlist Check Register Page: 7 12/30/2004 3:27:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 435618795 12/22/2004 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. (Continued) 001-4204-4303 93.24 Total : 93.24 05618796 12/22/2004 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 14120446001 Gas Billing/11-3 to 12-7-04 001-4204-4303 19.39 Total : 19.39 44 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 190,822.59 Total vouchers : 190,822.59 44 Vouchers in this report 1 hereby certify that the demands or clairps covered by the checks listed on pages / to At / inclusive, • of the check register for 1219 !311 /o f are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Date Finance Director Page: 7 Ha January 3, 2005 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council January 11, 2005 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please ratify the following request for cancellation of the check listed below: #35785 — 2/12/04 — Ray Wright Construction — $1,600.00 The check was lost in the mail. A stop payment has been placed. Concur: ��; '� �- Ste: en R. Burrell, City Manager John M. Workman, City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director January 6, 2005 • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council • Regular Meeting of January 11, 2005 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS JANUARY 25, 2005 APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE Public Hearing: Text Amendment to Chapter 17.22 Construction, Maintenance and Development - Minimum design standards requiring separate water meters. Community Development Director Public Hearing: Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocations for the following: a. An estimated $100,000 for the continuing project to retrofit the Community Theater and Center for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). b. An estimated $11,000 to administer the CDBG Program in accordance with county and federal regulations. Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of January 4, 2005. Community Resources Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of January 18, 2005. Community Development Director Activity Reports for December 2004 All Departments FEBRUARY 8, 2005 Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of January 19, 2005. Public Works Director Mid -Year Budget Review Finance Director User Fee Study Finance Director FEBRUARY 22, 2005 Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of February 1, 2005. Community Resources Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of February 15, 2005. Community Development Director Trash Can Ordinance City Manager Activity Reports for January 2005 All Departments 2c January 3, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting ofJanuary 11, 2005 the Hermosa Beach City Council REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS NOVEMBER 2004 Attached are the November 2004 Revenue and Expenditure reports. General Fund revenue is 29.1% received e� revenue wo/0 of the fiscal uld d be 40.03% ear. receAdjusting for property tax revenues, General Fun Parking Fund revenue is 45.9% received. General Fund expenditures are 42.41% the fiscal ded ed and E Parki grFu Fund o expenditures are 41.22% expended for 41.67 /o of Y necessarily occur on an incremental basis. Respectfully submitted, 1 /� , Viki Copeland Finance Director NOTED: City Manager F:\b95\Financel\rev 2d1 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 1 001 General Fund Account Number 3100 Taxes Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3101 Current Year Secured 5,165,269.00 0.00 0.00 5,165,269.00 0.00 3102 Current Year Unsecured 344,267.00 0.00 246,190.00 98,077.00 71.51 • 3103 Prior Year Collections 112,000.00 66,617.90 63,157.50 48,842.50 56.39 3104 In -lieu Sales Tax 524,375.00 0.00 - 0.00 524,375.00 0.00 3106 Supplemental Roll SB813 173,000.00 48,403.43 125,278.92 47,721.08 72.42 3107 Transfer Tax 225,000.00 12,204.49 87,610.29 137,389.71 38.94 3108 Sales Tax 1,633,126.00 190,400.00 861,982.17 771,143.83 52.78 3109 1/2 Cent Sales Tx Ext 160,000.00 13,322.95 41,708.30 118,291.70 26.07 3110 Cable TV Franchise 220,000.0038,391.14 38,391.14 181,608.86 17.45 3111 Electric Franchise 61,000.00 0.00 0.00 61,000.00 0.00 3112 Gas Franchise 49,000.00 0.00 0.00 49,000.00 0.00 3113 Refuse Franchise 170,000.00 28,404.75 73,560.98 96,439.02 43.27 3114 Transient Occupancy Tax 1,200,000.00 306,252.10 440,805.71 759,194.29 36.73 3115 Business License 682,000.00 31,932.41 242,065.96 439,934.04 35.49 3120 Utility User Tax 2,362,947.00 215,850.89 910,741.23 1,452,205.77 38.54 • Total Taxes 13,081,984.00 951,780.06 3,131,492.20 9,950,491.80 23.94 3200 Licenses And Permits 3202 Dog Licenses 9,000.00 1,186.00 7,154.75 1,845.25 79.50 3203 Bicycle Licenses 50.00 0.00 21.00 29.00 42.00 3204 Building Permits 267,400.00 47,113.71 151,689.81 115,710.19 56.73 3205 Electric Permits 56,000.00 3,379.00 17,272.00 38,728.00 30.84 3206 Plumbing Permits 40,250.00 2,713.00 18,356.00 21,894.00 45.60 Page: 1 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 2 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3207 Occupancy Permits 7,000.00 466.00 2,885.00 4,115.00 41.21 3209 Garage Sales 100.00 6.00 27.00 73.00 27.00 • 3211 Banner Permits 3,000.00 245.00 1,897.00 1,103.00 63.23 3212 Animal/Fowl Permits 54.00 0.00 66.00 -12.00 122.22 3213 Animal Redemption Fee 2,200.00 66.00 646.00 1,554.00 29.36 3214 Amplified Sound Permit 1,000.00 92.00 542.00 458.00 54.20 3215 Temporary Sign Permit 912.00 195.00 310.00 602.00 33.99 3217 Open Fire Permit 265.00 0.00 320.00 -55.00 120.75 3218 Auto Repair Permit 2,183.00 0.00 74.00 2,109.00 3.39 3219 Newsrack Permits 1,380.00 0.00 0.00 1,380.00 0.00 3225 Taxicab Franchise Fees 154,000.00 0.00 0.00154,000.00 0.00 Total Licenses And Permits 544,794.00 55,461.71 201,260.56 343,533.44 36.94 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3301 Municipal Court Fines 300,000.00 44,745.38 181,360.73 118,639.27 60.45 Total Fines & Forfeitures 300,000.00 44,745.38 181,360.73 118,639.27 60.45 • 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 42,346.00 -6.30 7,309.95 35,036.05 17.26 3402 Rents & Concessions 50.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 3403 Pier Revenue 900.00 71.50 478.75 421.25 53.19 3404 Community Center Leases 64,000.00 5,369.84 28,756.88 35,243.12 44.93 3405 Community Center Rentals 45,000.00 8,476.50 40,111.00 4,889.00 89.14 3406 Community Center Theatre 45,000.00 8,387.50 28,988.50 16,011.50 64.42 3411 Other Facilities 16,300.00 1,071.00 4,479.00 11,821.00 27.48 3412 Tennis Courts 20,000.00 2,071.00 7,856.25 12,143.75 39.28 Page: 2 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 3 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3418 Special Events 40,000.00 5,341.00 34,771.00 5,229.00 86.93 3475 Investment Premium -691.00 -4.56 -365.54 -325.46 52.90 Total Use Of Money & Property 272,905.00 30,777.48 152,385.79 120,519.21 55.84 3500 I ntergovemmental/State • 3504 In Lieu Off Highway 563.00 0.00 414.06 148.94 73.55 3505 In Lieu Motor Vehicle 1,175,836.00 19,529.52 73,459.26 1,102,376.74 6.25 3507 Highway Maintenance 1,864.00 0.00 0.00 1,864.00 0.00 3508 Mandated Costs 0.00 729.20 729.20 -729.20 0.00 3509 Homeowner Property Tax Relief 71,400.00 0.00 0.00 71,400.00 0.00 3510 POST 5,000.00 406.80 4,970.70 29.30 99.41 Total Intergovernmental/State 1,254,663.00 20,665.52 79,573.22 1,175,089.78 6.34 3800 Current Service Charges 3801 Residential Inspection 15,000.00 1,976.00 7,573.40 7,426.60 50.49 3802 Sign Review 2,060.00 107.00 741.00 1,319.00 35.97 3803 Environmental Impact 754.00 0.00 0.00 754.00 0.00 3805 Conditional Use Permit Amendment 2,454.00 -385.20 875.80 1,578.20 35.69 •3807 Refuse Lien Fees/Consolidated 572.00 39.86 39.86532.14 6.97 3808 Zone Variance Review 4,720.00 0.00 2,360.00 2,360.00 50.00 3809 Tentative Map Review 1,175.00 0.00 0.00 1,175.00 0.00 3810 Final Map Review 5,740.00 298.00 1,479.00 4,261.00 25.77 3811 Zone Change/Gen Plan Amendment 3,064.00 0.00 0.00 3,064.00 0.00 3812 Conditional Use Review 20,682.00 2,106.46 11,878.00 8,804.00 57.43 3813 Plan Check Fees 194,482.00 32,970.14 127,628.73 66,853.27 65.62 3814 Planning/Zoning Appeal 618.00 0.00 428.00 190.00 69.26 Page: 3 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 4 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3815 Public Works Services 14,000.00 6,739.00 22,456.00 -8,456.00 160.40 3818 Police Services 800.00 1,018.00 2,186.00 -1,386.00 273.25 *3819 Jail Services 20,000.00 2,254.00 9,338.00 10,662.00 46.69 3823 Special Event Security/Police 40,000.00 6,492.00 21,519.00 18,481.00 53.80 3825 Public Notice Posting 51.00 0.00 36.00 15.00 70.59 3827 Library Grounds Maintenance 9,357.00 0.00 9,357.60 -0.60 100.01 3831 Street Cut Inspection 44,000.00 1,542.00 26,769.00 17,231.00 60.84 3833 Recreation Service Charges 5,000.00 -5.00 573.81 4,426.19 11.48 3834 Encroachment Permit 174,794.00 7,241.08 89,186.20 85,607.80 51.02 3837 Retumed Check Charge 1,000.00 80.00 300.00 700.00 30.00 3838 Sale Of Maps/Publications 150.00 18.00 160.00 10.00 106.67 3839 Photocopy Charges 700.00 89.50 362.70 337.30 51.81 3840 Ambulance Transport 146,000.00 24,029.06 95,587.26 50,412.74 65.47 3841 Police Towing 38,000.00 2,559.00 11,796.00 26,204.00 31.04 3857 Parking Plan Application 4,700.00 -1,096.20 121.80 4,578.20 21.59 3859 Refuse Lien Fee/B.F.I. 0.00 -0.52 -0.52 0.52 0.00 • 3862 Alarm Permit Fee 800.00 76.00 228.00 572.00 28.50 3863 False Alarm Fee 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 3866 Nonconforming Remodels 6,848.00 0.00 0.00 6,848.00 0.00 3867 Precise Development Plans 29,240.00 1,516.00 14,836.00 14,404.00 50.74 3868 Public Noticing/300 Ft Radius 27,896.00 734.00 11,512.00 16,384.00 41.27 3869 2nd Party Response 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 3870 Legal Determination Hearing 1,274.00 0.00 3,916.00 -2,642.00 307.38 3878 Reinspection Fee 448.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 0.00 3882 Spec Event Security/Fire 1,848.00 72.00 2,536.00 -688.00 137.23 Page: 4 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 5 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3883 Final/Tentative Map Extension 287.00 0.00 287.00 0.00 100.00 3887 Voluntary Lot Merger 408.00 0.00 0.00 408.00 0.00 3888 Planning Commission Appeals 2,532.00 438.00 438.00 2,094.00 17.30 3890 300 Ft Radius Noticing/Appeal to CC 3,740.00 0.00 460.00 3,280.00 12.30 •3893 Contract Recreation Classes 346,250.00 14,061.00 182,378.09 163,871.91 52.67 3894 Other Recreation Programs 82,000.00 455.00 62,663.52 19,336.48 76.42 3897 Admin Fee/TULIP Ins Certificate 400.00 0.00 33.00 367.00 8.25 3899 C.U.P. Minor Amendment 236.00 0.00 0.00 236.00 0.00 Total Current Service Charges 1,254,480.00 105,424.18 722,040.25 532,439.75 57.56 3900 Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 500.00 0.00 139.26 360.74 27.85 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 0.00 494.63 -494.63 0.00 3903 Contributions Non Govt 0.00500.00 100,518.50 -100,518.50 0.00 3904 General Miscellaneous 0.00 10,050.07 48,370.37 -48,370.37 0.00 3909 Late Fee 100.00 0.00 43.61 56.39 43.61 3920 BCHD Healthy Cities Fund 21,840.00 0.00 0.00 21,840.00 0.00 3945 In-Sery Firefighter Tmg Prog/EI Camino 12,268.00 0.00 0.00 12,268.00 0.00 • 3955 Operating Transfers In 2,012,262.00 167,480.00 839,900.00 1,172,362.00 41.74 Total Other Revenue 2,046,970.00 178,030.07 989,466.37 1,057,503.63 48.34 Total General Fund 18,755,796.00 1,386,884.40 5,457,579.12 13,298,216.88 29.10 Page: 5 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 6 105 Lightq/Landscapq Dist Fund Account Number 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured •103 Prior Year Collections 3105 Assessment Rebates Total Taxes • 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue Total Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 447,000.00 0.00 0.00 447,000.00 0.00 12,000.00 3,353.83 4,822.86 7,177.14 40.19 -3,100.00 -49.22 -295.32 -2,804.68 9.53 455,900.00 3,304.61 4,527.54 451,372.46 0.99 1,881.00 0.00 709.91 1,171.09 37.74 -31.00 -1.13 -11.65 -19.35 37.58 1,850.00 -1.13 698.26 1,151.74 37.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 457,750.00 3,303.48 5,225.80 452,524.20 1.14 Page: 6 • • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 7 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 16,376.00 0.00 5,333.97 11,042.03 32.57 3420 Other Interest Income 14,100.00 1,285.87 6,467.82 7,632.18 45.87 3425 Ground Lease 21,000.00 1,750.00 8,750.00 12,250.00 41.67 3427 CeII Site License 24,000.00 2,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 50.00 3475 Investment Premium -266.00 -15.03 -96.46 -169.54 36.26 Total Use Of Money & Property 75,210.00 5,020.84 32,455.33 42,754.67 43.15 3800 Current Service Charges 3815 Public Works Services 3,900.00 0.00 2,675.00 1,225.00 68.59 3844 Lot A Revenue 302,000.00 19,788.00 113,605.00 188,395.00 37.62 3846 North Pier Parking Structure Revenue 676,500.00 46,356.00 292,618.00 383,882.00 43.25 Total Current Service Charges 982,400.00 66,144.00 408,898.00 573,502.00 41.62 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Downtown Enhancement Fund 1,057,610.00 71,164.84 441,353.33 616,256.67 41.73 Page: 7 • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 8 110 Parking Fund Account Number 3300 Fines & Forfeitures Adjusted Estimate 3302 Court Fines/Parking 1,193,135.00 Total Fines & Forfeitures 1,193,135.00 Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 69,058.95 628,901.87 564,233.13 52.71 69,058.95 628,901.87 564,233.13 52.71 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 5,675.00 0.00 2,640.79 3,034.21 46.53 3475 Investment Premium -92.00 -6.24 -39.94 -52.06 43.41 Total Use Of Money & Property 5,583.00 -6.24 2,600.85 2,982.15 46.59 3800 Current Service Charges 3842 Parking Meters 3843 Parking Permits/Annual 3844 Daily Parking Permits 3848 Driveway Permits 3849 Guest Permits 3850 Contractors Permits 3851 Cash Key Revenue Total Current Service Charges 1,437,000.00 98,894.58 693,235.36 743,764.64 48.24 305,000.00 2,069.50 22,398.00 282,602.00 7.34 700.00 42.00 384.00 316.00 54.86 400.00 72.00 265.00 135.00 66.25 1,900.00 61.00 848.00 1,052.00 44.63 12,000.00 1,400.00 6,795.00 5,205.00 56.63 3,000.00 500.00 2,590.00 410.00 86.33 1,760,000.00 103,039.08 726,515.36 1,033,484.64 41.28 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 Total Parking Fund 2,958,718.00 0.00 172,091.79 0.00 1,358,018.08 0.00 0.00 1,600,699.92 45.90 Page: 8 • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 9 115 State Gas Tax Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 31.00 0.00 332.68 -301.68 1073.16 3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.41 -1.34 1.34 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 31.00 -0.41 331.34 -300.34 1068.84 3500 Intergovemmental/State 3501 Section 2106 Allocation 76,257.00 13,089.18 32,621.45 43,635.55 42.78 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 158,646.00 27,752.77 69,651.74 88,994.26 43.90 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 100.00 3512 Section 2105 (Prop 111) 118,248.00 20,659.91 51,992.13 66,255.87 43.97 3522 TDA Artide 3/Local 0.00 0.00 36,844.00 -36,844.00 0.00 Total Intergovemmental/State 357,151.00 61,501.86 195,109.32 162,041.68 54.63 Total State Gas Tax Fund 357,182.00 61,501.45 195,440.66 161,741.34 54.72 Page: 9 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/3012004 Page: 10 117 AB939 Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 8,574.00 0.00 2,313.74 6,260.26 26.99 •3475 Investment Premium -139.00 -6.33 -40.49 -98.51 29.13 Total Use Of Money & Property 8,435.00 -6.33 2,273.25 6,161.75 26.95 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3563 CA Cons Corp/Recycle Lid Grant Reimb 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 -5,000.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 0.00 0.00 5,000.00-5,000.00 0.00 3800 Current Service Charges 3860 AB939 Surcharge 59,020.00 4,999.63 20,044.05 38,975.95 33.96 Total Current Service Charges 59,020.00 4,999.63 20,044.05 38,975.95 33.96 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total AB939 Fund 67,455.00 4,993.30 27,317.30 40,137.70 40.50 • Page: 10 • • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 11 121 Prop A Open Space Fund Account Number 3600 Intergovernmental/County 3606 LA Co Parks/Pier Renovation 3608 Maintenance Allocation Total Prop A Open Space Fund Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 221,743.00 0.00 0.00 221,743.00 0.00 20,557.00 0.00 0.00 20,557.00 0.00 242,300.00 0.00 0.00 242,300.00 0.00 Page: 11 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 12 122 Tyco Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 37,813.00 0.00 14,045.43 23,767.57 37.14 •3426 Easement Agreement 600,000.00 0.00 375,000.00 225,000.00 62.50 3475 Investment Premium -615.00 -38.81 -226.18 -388.82 36.78 Total Tyco Fund 637,198.00 -38.81 388,819.25 248,378.75 61.02 • Page: 12 • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 13 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund Account Number 3100 Taxes Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3116 Parks & Recreation Facility Tax 7,000.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 50.00 Total Taxes 7,000.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 50.00 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3,516.00 0.00 1,399.09 2,116.91 39.79 3475 Investment Premium -57.00 -3.93 -22.69 -34.31 39.81 Total Use Of Money & Property 3,459.00 -3.93 1,376.40 2,082.60 39.79 3900 Other Revenue 3910 Park/Recreation In Lieu Fee 41,168.00 20,653.00 48,239.00 -7,071.00 117.18 Total Other Revenue 41,168.00 20,653.00 48,239.00 -7,071.00 117.18 Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 51,627.00 24,149.07 53,115.40 -1,488.40 102.88 Page: 13 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 14 126 4% Utility Users Tax Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 617.00 0.00 196.10 420.90 31.78 •3475 Investment Premium -10.00 -0.53 -3.31 -6.69 33.10 Total 4% Utility Users Tax Fund 607.00 -0.53 192.79414.21 31.76 • Page: 14 • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 15 127 Building Improvement Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property Adjusted Estimate 3401 Interest Income 93.00 Total Building Improvement Fund 93.00 Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 0.00 28.92 64.08 31.10 0.00 28.92 64.08 31.10 Page: 15 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 16 136 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund Account Number 3900 Other Revenue Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 2,905.00 0.00 0.00 2,905.00 0.00 • Total Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 2,905.00 0.00 0.00 2,905.00 0.00 • Page: 16 • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 17 137 Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Total Use Of Money & Property 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees Total Other Revenue Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 123.00 0.00 40.28 82.72 32.75 123.00 0.00 40.28 82.72 32.75 9,400.00 0.00 0.00 9,400.00 0.00 9,400.00 0.00 0.00 9,400.00 0.00 Total Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund 9,523.00 0.00 40.28 9,482.72 0.42 Page: 17 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 18 138 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3 401 Interest Income Total Use Of Money & Property 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees • Total Other Revenue Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 185.00 0.00 59.55 125.45 32.19 185.00 0.00 59.55 125.45 32.19 10,267.00 0.00 0.00 10,267.00 0.00 10,267.00 0.00 0.00 10,267.00 0.00 Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 10,452.00 0.00 59.55 10,392.45 0.57 Page: 18 • • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 19 139 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property Total Use Of Money & Property 3900 Other Revenue Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 19 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 20 140 Community Dev Block Grant Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal 3715 CDBG Administration 11,300.00 2,482.00 4,794.00 6,506.00 42.42 0720 Americans with Disabilities Act 0.00 2,865.28 2,865.28 -2,865.28 0.00 3723 Community Center Theatre/Phase III -V 148,222.00 0.00 0.00 148,222.00 0.00 Total Community Dev Block Grant 159,522.00 5,347.28 7,659.28 151,862.72 4.80 • Page: 20 • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 21 145 Proposition A Fund Account Number 3100 Taxes Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3117 Proposition A Transit 276,022.00 43,203.84 111,997.06 164,024.94 40.58 3121 Subregional Incentives 42,268.00 0.00 10,679.46 31,588.54 25.27 Total Taxes 318,290.00 43,203.84 122,676.52 195,613.48 38.54 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3,300.00 0.00 1,630.26 1,669.74 49.40 3475 Investment Premium -54.00 -3.47 -27.04 -26.96 50.07 Total Use Of Money & Property 3,246.00 -3.47 1,603.22 1,642.78 49.39 3800 Current Service Charges 3853 Dial -A -Taxi Program 4,000.00 430.00 1,930.00 2,070.00 48.25 3854 Fares, Dial -A -Ride 11,250.00 0.00 2,326.05 8,923.95 20.68 3855 Bus Passes 300.00 90.40 300.80 -0.80 100.27 Total Current Service Charges 15,550.00 520.40 4,556.85 10,993.15 29.30 Total Proposition A Fund 337,086.00 43,720.77 128,836.59 208,249.41 38.22 Page: 21 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 22 146 Proposition C Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3118 Proposition C Local Retum 226,492.00 35,872.08 92,923.99 133,568.01 41.03 Total Taxes 226,492.00 35,872.08 92,923.99 133,568.01 41.03 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 16,131.00 0.00 6,194.26 9,936.74 38.40 3475 Investment Premium -262.00 -17.19 -103.89 -158.11 39.65 Total Use Of Money & Property 15,869.00 -17.19 6,090.37 9,778.63 38.38 Total Proposition C Fund 242,361.00 35,854.89 99,014.36 143,346.64 40.85 Page: 22 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 23 150 Grants Fund Account Number 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3529 Wildlife Conservation Grant 3543 Per Capita Grant 3544 Roberti-Z'Berg Grant 3558 Beverage Recycling Grant 3564 State Homeland Security Grant 2004 Total I ntergovemmental/State 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal Total Intergovemmental/Federal Total Grants Fund Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 324,000.00 0.00 0.00 324,000.00 0.00 220,000.00 0.00 0.00 220,000.00 0.00 51,991.00 0.00 0.00 51,991.00 0.00 5,374.00 0.00 5,374.00 0.00 100.00 34,104.00 0.00 0.00 34,104.00 0.00 635,469.00 0.00 5,374.00 630,095.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 635,469.00 0.00 5,374.00 630,095.00 0.85 Page: 23 • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 24 151 Ofc of Traffic Sfty Grant Fund Account Number 3500 Intergovemmental/State 3565 Ticket Writer/Traffic Mgmt Grant Total Ofc of Traffic Sfty Grant Fund Adjusted Estimate 711,845.00 711,845.00 Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 711,845.00 711,845.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 24 • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 25 152 Air Quality Mqmt Dist Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3538 AQMD Emission Control AB2766 Total Intergovernmental/State Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 0.00 0.00 145.73 -145.73 0.00 0.00 -0.40 -0.80 0.80 0.00 0.00 -0.40 144.93 -144.93 0.00 22,000.00 22,000.00 22,000.00 0.00 0.00 22,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,000.00 0.00 -0.40 144.93 21,855.07 0.66 Page: 25 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 26 153 Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3135 C.O.P.S. Allocation 100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 100.00 • Total Taxes 100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 100.00 3400 Use Of Money & Property • 3401 Interest Income 2,992.00 0.00 540.41 2,451.59 18.06 3475 Investment Premium -49.00 -3.20 -9.99 -39.01 20.39 Total Use Of Money & Property 2,943.00 -3.20 530.42 2,412.58 18.02 Total Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) 102,943.00 -3.20 100,530.42 2,412.58 97.66 Page: 26 • • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 27 154 CA Law Enf Equip Proq Fund (CLEEP) Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 956.00 0.00 250.48 705.52 26.20 3475 Investment Premium -15.00 -0.54 -6.07 -8.93 40.47 Total CA Law Enf Equip Prog Fund (CLEEP) 941.00 -0.54 244.41 696.59 25.97 Page: 27 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 28 156 Taskforce for Req Autotheft Prev (TRAP) Account Number 3600 Intergovernmental/County Aih3620 T.R.A.P. Taskforce Reimbursement Total Intergovernmental/County • • 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue Total Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prev (TRAP) Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 123,293.00 0.00 0.00 123,293.00 0.00 123,293.00 0.00 0.00 123,293.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 123,293.00 0.00 0.00 123,293.00 0.00 Page: 28 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 29 160 Sewer Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 35,129.00 0.00 8,722.50 26,406.50 24.83 3475 Investment Premium -571.00 -23.89 -147.35 -423.65 25.81 Total Use Of Money & Property 34,558.00 -23.89 8,575.15 25,982.85 24.81 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3550 CA Waste Oil Recycling Grant 5,400.00 0.00 0.00 5,400.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 5,400.00 0.00 0.00 5,400.00 0.00 3600 Intergovemmental/County 3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/County 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 3800 Current Service Charges 3828 Sewer Connection Fee 7,670.00 2,467.25 5,934.09 1,735.91 77.37 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 6,000.00 1,386.00 4,321.00 1,679.00 72.02 3832 Sewer Lateral Installation 7,000.00 594.00 3,098.00 3,902.00 44.26 Total Current Service Charges 20,670.00 4,447.25 13,353.09 7,316.91 64.60 3900 Other Revenue 3917 Adopt -A -Storm Drain Donation 9,536.00 0.00 1,804.80 7,731.20 18.93 3955 Operating Transfers In 700,000.00 58,333.00 291,665.00 408,335.00 41.67 Total Other Revenue 709,536.00 58,333.00 293,469.80 416,066.20 41.36 Total Sewer Fund 772,664.00 62,756.36 315,398.04 457,265.96 40.82 Page: 29 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 30 170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3304 State Forfeited Funds 400.00 192.17 192.17 207.83 48.04 0307 Department of Justice Forfeited Funds 3,000.00 1,545.33 1,545.33 1,454.67 51.51 Total Fines & Forfeitures 3,400.00 1,737.50 1,737.50 1,662.50 51.10 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3,454.00 0.00677.74 2,776.26 19.62 3475 Investment Premium -56.00 -1.69 -12.93 -43.07 23.09 Total Use Of Money & Property 3,398.00 -1.69664.81 2,733.19 19.56 Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 6,798.00 1,735.81 2,402.31 4,395.69 35.34 • Page: 30 • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 31 180 Fire Protection Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 9,314.00 0.00 2,248.82 7,065.18 24.14 3475 Investment Premium -152.00 -5.22 -39.80 -112.20 26.18 Total Use Of Money & Property 9,162.00 -5.22 2,209.02 6,952.98 24.11 3900 Other Revenue 3912 Fire Flow Fee 67,200.00 18,514.00 43,816.00 23,384.00 65.20 Total Other Revenue 67,200.00 18,514.00 43,816.00 23,384.00 65.20 Total Fire Protection Fund 76,362.00 18,508.78 46,025.02 30,336.98 60.27 Page: 31 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 32 198 Retirement Stabilization Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 7,680.00 0.006,598.71 1,081.29 85.92 .3475 Investment Premium -125.00 -18.50 -64.89 -60.11 51.91 Total Use Of Money & Property 7,555.00 -18.50 6,533.82 1,021.18 86.48 3900 Other Revenue • Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Retirement Stabilization Fund 7,555.00 -18.50 6,533.82 1,021.18 86.48 Page: 32 • • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 33 199 Contingency Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 54,992.00 0.00 17,157.45 37,834.55 31.20 3475 Investment Premium -894.00 -46.40 -292.24 -601.76 32.69 Total Contingency Fund 54,098.00 -46.40 16,865.21 37,232.79 31.18 Page: 33 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 34 301 Capital Improvement Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 40,650.00 0.00 15,853.34 24,796.66 39.00 •475 Investment Premium -661.00 -44.66 -226.20 -434.80 34.22 Total Use Of Money & Property 39,989.00 -44.66 15,627.14 24,361.86 39.08 • 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In 588,763.00 49,064.00 245,320.00 343,443.00 41.67 Total Other Revenue 588,763.00 49,064.00 245,320.00 343,443.00 41.67 Total Capital Improvement Fund 628,752.00 49,019.34 260,947.14 367,804.86 41.50 Page: 34 i revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 35 302 Artesia Blvd Relinquishment Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 10,671.00 0.00 3,417.16 7,253.84 32.02 3475 Investment Premium -173.00 -9.24 -58.07 -114.93 33.57 Total Artesia Blvd Relinquishment 10,498.00 -9.24 3,359.09 7,138.91 32.00 Page: 35 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 36 305 Lwr Pier Assmnt Dist Impr Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income •475 Investment Premium Total Lwr Pier Assmnt Dist Impr Fund • Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 1,450.00 0.00 461.78 988.22 31.85 -23.00 -1.25 -7.86 -15.14 34.17 1,427.00 -1.25 453.92 973.08 31.81 Page: 36 i revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 37 307 Myrtle Util Undrqrnd Impr Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 93.00 0.00 29.82 63.18 • 32.06 3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.08 -0.16 0.16 0.00 Total Myrtle Util Undrgrnd Impr Fund 93.00 -0.08 29.66 63.34 31.89 Page: 37 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 38 308 Loma Util Undrgrnd Improv Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 2,036.00 0.00 648.30 1,387.70 31.84 11475 Investment Premium -33.00 -1.76 -11.06 -21.94 33.52 Total Loma Util Undrgrnd Improv Fund 2,003.00 -1.76637.24 1,365.76 31.81 • Page: 38 • revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report Page: 39 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 311 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Improvmnt Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property 3900 Other Revenue 3936 Contrib From Property Owners 3940 Cash Pmts/U61 Undergrounding Total Other Revenue Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Improvmnt Fund Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 0.00 -1.32 -2.64 2.64 0.00 0.00 -1.32 -2.64 2.64 0.00 401,341.00 0.00 401,341.00 0.00 100.00 89,028.00 0.00 89,028.78 -0.78 100.00 490,369.00 0.00 490,369.78 -0.78 100.00 490,369.00 -1.32 490,367.14 1.86 100.00 Page: 39 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 40 610 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 01 Interest Income ill Total Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund • Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 278.00 0.00 37.72 240.28 13.57 278.00 0.00 37.72 240.28 13.57 Page: 40 i revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 - 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 41 611 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 41 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 42 612 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.00 18.83 -18.83 0.00 Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd • Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund • 0.00 0.00 18.83 -18.83 0.00 Page: 42 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 43 617 Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,049.00 0.00 188.27 860.73 17.95 Total Use Of Money & Property 1,049.00 0.00 188.27 860.73 17.95 . 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 Total Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund 1,049.00 0.00 188.27 860.73 17.95 • Page: 43 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 44 618 Loma Drive Assessment Fund Account Number 3400 Use Of Money & Property Adjusted Estimate dik3401 Interest Income 1,018.00 Mr Total Loma Drive Assessment Fund 1,018.00 0.00 108.11 909.89 10.62 Revenues Year-to-date Prot Revenues Balance Rcvd 0.00 108.11 909.89 10.62 • Page: 44 • s revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 45 705 Insurance Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3800 Current Service Charges 3880 Insurance Service Charges 1,450,152.00 120,846.00 604,230.00 845,922.00 41.67 Total Current Service Charges 1,450,152.00 120,846.00 604,230.00 845,922.00 41.67 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Insurance Fund 1,450,152.00 120,846.00 604,230.00 845,922.00 41.67 Page: 45 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report Page: 46 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Prct Revenues Balance Rcvd 3800 Current Service Charges 3885 Computer/Business Machine Charges 478,904.00 39,908.00 199,540.00 279,364.00 41.67 W889 Equipment Replacement Charges 620,377.00 51,698.00 258,490.00 361,887.00 41.67 Total Current Service Charges 1,099,281.00 91,606.00 458,030.00 641,251.00 41.67 3900 Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 15,000.00 0.00 10,372.80 4,627.20 69.15 3903 Contributions Non Govt 0.00 500.00 1,000.00 -1,000.00 0.00 3955 Operating Transfers In 13,470.00 923.00 7,015.00 6,455.00 52.08 Total Other Revenue 28,470.00 1,423.00 18,387.80 10,082.20 64.59 Total Equipment Replacement Fund 1,127,751.00 93,029.00 476,417.80 651,333.20 42.24 Grand Total 31,575,543.00 2,154,784.53 10,493, 013.79 21,082,529.21 33.23 Page: 46 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 47 Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Prct Account Number Estimate Revenues Revenues Balance Rcvd 001 General Fund 18,755,796.00 1,386,884.40 5,457,579.12 13,298,216.88 29.10 105 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 457,750.00 3,303.48 5,225.80 452,524.20 1.14 • 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund 1,057,610.00 71,164.84 441,353.33 616,256.67 41.73 110 Parking Fund 2,958,718.00 172,091.79 1,358,018.08 1,600,699.92 45.90 115 State Gas Tax Fund 357,182.00 61,501.45 195,440.66 161,741.34 54.72 117 AB939 Fund 67,455.00 4,993.30 27,317.30 40,137.70 40.50 120 County Gas Tax Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121 Prop A Open Space Fund 242,300.00 0.00 0.00 242,300.00 0.00 411 122 Tyco Fund 637,198.00 -38.81 388,819.25 248,378.75 61.02 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 51,627.00 24,149.07 53,115.40 -1,488.40 102.88 126 4% Utility Users Tax Fund 607.00 -0.53 192.79 414.21 31.76 127 Building Improvement Fund 93.00 0.00 28.92 64.08 31.10 Page: 47 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 48 Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Prct Account Number Estimate Revenues Revenues Balance Rcvd 136 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 2,905.00 0.00 0.00 2,905.00 0.00 07 Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund 9,523.00 0.00 40.28 9,482.72 0.42 138 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 10,452.00 0.00 59.55 10,392.45 0.57 140 Community Dev Block Grant 159,522.00 5,347.28 7,659.28 151,862.72 4.80 145 Proposition A Fund 337,086.00 43,720.77 128,836.59 208,249.41 38.22 146 Proposition C Fund 242,361.00 35,854.89 99,014.36 143,346.64 40.85 150 Grants Fund 635,469.00 0.00 5,374.00 630,095.00 0.85 • 151 Ofc of Traffic Sfty Grant Fund 711,845.00 0.00 0.00 711,845.00 0.00 152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 22,000.00 -0.40 144.93 21,855.07 0.66 153 Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) 102,943.00 -3.20 100,530.42 2,412.58 97.66 154 CA Law Enf Equip Prog Fund (CLEEP) 941.00 -0.54 244.41 696.59 25.97 156 Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prev (TRAP) 123,293.00 0.00 0.00 123,293.00 0.00 Page: 48 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 49 Account Number Recap Report Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Prot Balance Rcvd 160 Sewer Fund 772,664.00 62,756.36 315,398.04 457,265.96 40.82 170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 6,798.00 1,735.81 2,402.31 4,395.69 35.34 0 180 Fire Protection Fund 76,362.00 18,508.78 46,025.02 30,336.98 60.27 198 Retirement Stabilization Fund 7,555.00 -18.50 6,533.82 1,021.18 86.48 199 Contingency Fund 54,098.00 -46.40 16,865.21 37,232.79 31.18 301 Capital Improvement Fund 628,752.00 49,019.34 260,947.14 367,804.86 41.50 302 Artesia Blvd Relinquishment 10,498.00 -9.24 3,359.09 7,138.91 32.00 305 Lwr Pier Assmnt Dist Impr Fund 1,427.00 -1.25 453.92 973.08 31.81 0 307 Myrtle Util Undrgmd Impr Fund 93.00 -0.08 29.66 63.34 31.89 308 Loma Util Undrgmd Improv Fund 2,003.00 -1.76 637.24 1,365.76 31.81 311 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Improvmnt Fund 490,369.00 -1.32 490,367.14 1.86 100.00 610 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund 278.00 0.00 37.72 240.28 13.57 Page: 49 revstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:51 PM Revenue Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 50 Account Number Recap Report Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Prct Balance Rcvd 611 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1112 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund 0.00 0.00 18.83 -18.83 0.00 617 Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund 1,049.00 0.00 188.27 860.73 17.95 618 Loma Drive Assessment Fund 1,018.00 0.00 108.11 909.89 10.62 705 Insurance Fund 1,450,152.00 120,846.00 604,230.00 845,922.00 41.67 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 1,127,751.00 93,029.00 476,417.80 651,333.20 42.24 900 Investment Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grand Total 31,575,543.00 2,154,784.53 10,493,013.79 21,082,529.21 33.23 Page: 50 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report Page: 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 001 General Fund Account Number 1101 City Council 1101-4100 Personal Services ill1101-4102 Regular Salaries 1101-4111 Accrual Cash In 1101-4112 Part Time/Temporary 1101-4180 Retirement 1101-4188 Employee Benefits 1101-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1101-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 30,684.00 527.00 39,000.00 5,545.00 39,085.00 1,010.00 115,851.00 2,557.02 922.00 3,250.00 462.11 3,049.19 97.61 10,337.93 12,785.04 922.00 16,250.00 2,310.52 15,245.92 434.92 47,948.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,898.96 -395.00 22,750.00 3,234.48 23,839.08 575.08 67,902.60 41.67 174.95 41.67 41.67 39.01 43.06 41.39 1101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 15,255.00 203.46 1,059.91 8,000.00 6,195.09 59.39 Total Contract Services 15,255.00 203.46 1,059.91 8,000.00 6,195.09 59.39 1101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1101-4304 Telephone 1101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1101-4309 Maintenance Materials 1101-4315 Membership 1101-4317 Conference/Training •1101-4319 Special Events 1101-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total City Council 1121 City Clerk 1121-4100 Personal Services 1121-4102 Regular Salaries 1121-4111 Accrual Cash In 1121-4112 Part Time/Temporary 175.00 4,925.00 400.00 18,000.00 4,000.00 12,000.00 6,224.00 45,724.00 176,830.00 78,840.00 4,394.00 28,608.00 24.99 492.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 519.00 2,536.62 13,078.01 6,569.80 396.90 2,304.00 65.04 3,125.01 0.00 11,322.12 1,529.98 3,660.03 2,595.00 22,297.18 71,305.49 32,849.00 1,366.56 11,520.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,250.00 0.00 2,250.00 10,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 109.96 1,799.99 400.00 6,677.88 2,470.02 6,089.97 3,629.00 21,176.82 95,274.51 45,991.00 3,027.44 17,088.00 37.17 63.45 0.00 62.90 38.25 49.25 41.69 53.69 46.12 41.67 31.10 40.27 Page: 1 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report Page: 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 001 General Fund Account Number 1121-4180 Retirement 1121-4188 Employee Benefits 1121-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services .121-4200 Contract Services 1121-4201 Contract Sery/Private Total Contract Services 1121-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1121-4304 Telephone 1121-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1121-4315 Membership 1121-4317 Conference/Training 1121-4323 Public Noticing 1121-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 1121-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1121-5400 Equipment/Furniture Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 12,236.00 19,572.00 1,559.00 145,209.00 6,546.00 6,546.00 300.00 3,900.00 410.00 2,025.00 10,500.00 14,740.00 5,053.00 36,928.00 1121-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 500.00 • Total Equipment/Fumiture 500.00 Total City Clerk 189,183.00 1131 City Attomey 1131-4200 Contract Services 1131-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total City Attomey 1132 City Prosecutor 1132-4100 Personal Services 160,000.00 160,000.00 1,010.56 1,529.17 134.59 11,945.02 5,052.80 7,645.85 663.98 59,098.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,183.20 11,926.15 895.02 86,110.81 41.29 39.07 42.59 40.70 0.00 487.90 0.00 6,058.10 7.45 0.00 487.90 ' 0.00 6,058.10 7.45 41.77 248.29 271.68 395.00 340.50 1,228.00 421.00 2,946.24 122.22 1,852.63 356.68 712.48 2,445.70 6,140.00 2,105.00 13,734.71 0.00 570.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 570.72 177.78 1,476.65 53.32 1,312.52 8,054.30 8,600.00 2,948.00 22,622.57 40.74 62.14 87.00 35.18 23.29 41.66 41.66 38.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 14,891.26 73,320.80 570.72 115,291.48 39.06 12,989.00 42,466.85 0.00 117,533.15 12,989.00 42,466.85 0.00 117,533.15 26.54 26.54 Page: 2 • expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 3 001 General Fund Account Number 1132-4188 Employee Benefits Total Personal Services 1132-4200 Contract Services 1132-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 1132-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1132-4304 Telephone 1132-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1132-4315 Membership 1132-4317 Conference/Training Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total City Prosecutor 1141 City Treasurer 1141-4100 Personal Services 1141-4102 Regular Salaries 1141-4111 Accrual Cash In 1141-4112 Part Time/Temporary 1141-4180 Retirement 1141-4188 Employee Benefits • 1141-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1141-4200 Contract Services 1141-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 1141-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1141-4304 Telephone 1141-4305 Office Oper Supplies Adjusted Appropriation 4,928.00 4,928.00 140,000.00 140,000.00 125.00 200.00 150.00 500.00 975.00 145,903.00 24,132.00 176.00 16,464.00 4,623.00 12,615.00 589.00 58,599.00 18,397.00 18,397.00 821.00 2,098.00 Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures 382.36 382.36 9,480.00 9,480.00 24.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.31 9,886.67 2,011.01 0.00 1,325.50 379.92 991.67 48.42 4,756.52 291.67 291.67 79.37 257.70 1,911.80 1,911.80 41,441.80 41,441.80 91.90 70.36 125.00 0.00 287.26 43,640.86 10,055.03 0.00 6,627.50 1,899.61 4,958.42 242.10 23,782.66 6,208.30 6,208.30 199.83 911.65 Year-to-date Encumbrances 0.00 0.00 5,700.00 5,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Prct Balance Used 3,016.20 38.79 3,016.20 38.79 92,858.20 33.67 92,858.20 33.67 33.10 129.64 25.00 500.00 687.74 73.52 35.18 83.33 0.00 29.46 96,562.14 33.82 14,076.97 176.00 9,836.50 2,723.39 7,656.58 346.90 34,816.34 41.67 0.00 40.25 41.09 39.31 41.10 40.59 12,188.70 33.75 12,188.70 33.75 0.00 621.17 24.34 0.00 1,186.35 43.45 Page: 3 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18 PM Expenditure Status Report Page: 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 001 General Fund Account Number 1141-4315 Membership 1141-4317 Conference/Training 1141-4390Computer Replacement Chrgs .41-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total City Treasurer 1201 City Manager 1201-4100 Personal Services 1201-4102 Regular Salaries 1201-4111 Accrual Cash In 1201-4180 Retirement 1201-4188 Employee Benefits 1201-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1201-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 120.00 1,140.00 7,851.00 2,188.00 14,218.00 0.00 0.00 654.00 182.00 1,173.07 0.00 0.00 3,270.00 910.00 5,291.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 1,140.00 0.00 4,581.00 41.65 1,278.00 41.59 8,926.52 37.22 91,214.00 6,221.26 35,282.44 0.00 55,931.56 38.68 184,240.00 17,927.00 20,113.00 23,003.00 2,683.00 247,966.00 15,056.30 792.92 1,661.66 1,011.88 230.66 18,753.42 75,281.42 792.92 8,308.21 7,810.73 1,107.68 93,300.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2,500.00 0.00 204.75 0.00 Total Contract Services 2,500.00 0.00 204.75 0.00 201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other ai '1201-4304 Telephone 1201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1201-4315 Membership 1201-4317 Conference/Training 1201-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 1201-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total City Manager 1202 Finance Administration 1202-4100 Personal Services 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,400.00 3,500.00 10,815.00 9,013.00 26,728.00 277,194.00 98.05 17.85 0.00 720.53 901.00 751.00 2,488.43 21,241.85 318.18 312.59 1,383.20 3,298.03 4,505.00 3,755.00 13,572.00 107,077.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 108,958.58 17,134.08 11,804.79 15,192.27 1,575.32 154,665.04 40.86 4.42 41.31 33.96 41.29 37.63 2,295.25 8.19 2,295.25 8.19 681.82 687.41 16.80 201.97 6,310.00 5,258.00 13,156.00 170,116.29 31.82 31.26 98.80 94.23 41.66 41.66 50.78 38.63 Page: 4 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report Page: 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 001 General Fund Account Number 1202-4102 Regular Salaries 1202-4106 Regular Overtime 1202-4111 Accrual Cash In 1202-4180 Retirement 1202-4188 Employee Benefits • 1202-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1202-4200 Contract Services 1202-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 1202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1202-4304 Telephone 1202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1202-4315 Membership 1202-4317 Conference/Training 1202-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 1202-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Finance Administration 1203 Personnel • 1203-4100 Personal Services 1203-4102 Regular Salaries 1203-4111 Accrual Cash In 1203-4180 Retirement 1203-4188 Employee Benefits 1203-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1203-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 336,718.00 581.00 22,145.00 37,939.00 43,942.00 2,407.00 443,732.00 90,606.00 90,606.00 2,200.00 9,913.00 350.00 5,767.00 37,031.00 16,671.00 71,932.00 606,270.00 83,460.00 2,285.00 9,265.00 39,629.00 1,212.00 135,851.00 36,241.85 0.00 12,188.55 4,093.41 3,519.34 218.80 56,261.95 1,250.00 1,250.00 218.97 1,044.21 0.00 153.63 3,086.00 1,389.00 5,891.81 63,403.76 11,254.52 0.00 1,261.64 5,796.87 165.35 18,478.38 144,703.77 0.00 15,708.09 16,309.65 17,596.44 1,040.47 195,358.42 28,671.39 28,671.39 746.40 4,455.25 315.00 1,882.38 15,430.00 6,945.00 29,774.03 253,803.84 37,508.64 0.00 9,967.68 28,531.97 554.79 76,563.08 0.00 192,014.23 42.97 0.00 581.00 0.00 0.00 6,436.91 70.93 0.00 21,629.35 42.99 0.00 26,345.56 40.04 0.00 1,366.53 43.23 0.00 248,373.58 44.03 19,547.50 19,547.50 0.00 57.32 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 137.32 42,387.11 53.22 42,387.11 53.22 1,453.60 33.93 5,400.43 45.52 35.00 90.00 3,804.62 34.03 21,601.00 41.67 9,726.00 41.66 42,020.65 41.58 19,684.82 332,781.34 45.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45,951.36 44.94 2,285.00 0.00 -702.68 107.58 11,097.03 72.00 657.21 45.77 59,287.92 56.36 Page: 5 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18 PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 6 001 General Fund Account Number 1203-4201 Contract Sery/Private 1203-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 903-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1203-4304 Telephone 1203-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1203-4315 Membership 1203-4317 Conference/Training 1203-4320 Medical Exams 1203-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 1203-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Personnel 1208 General Appropriations 1208-4100 Personal Services 1208-4102 1208-4111 1208-4180 AIN208-4188 Wi 208-4189 Regular Salaries Accrual Cash In Retirement Employee Benefits Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1208-4200 Contract Services 1208-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 1208-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1208-4304 Telephone 1208-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1208-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs Adjusted Appropriation 45,675.00 7,000.00 52,675.00 1,885.00 4,000.00 820.00 12,800.00 14,100.00 20,134.00 4,597.00 58,336.00 246,862.00 45,870.00 3,515.00 5,224.00 10,496.00 665.00 65,770.00 36.00 36.00 150.00 -20,000.00 20,630.00 Year-to-date Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances 2,496.41 0.00 2,496.41 240.55 1,415.63 0.00 253.20 150.00 1,678.00 383.00 4,120.38 25,095.17 3,830.00 0.00 436.14 820.48 55.54 5,142.16 0.00 0.00 20.83 -939.11 1,719.00 21,004.73 0.00 21,004.73 828.24 1,970.33 299.00 3,036.20 2,334.00 8,390.00 1,915.00 18,772.77 116,340.58 18,969.00 0.00 2,160.14 4,100.10 275.07 25,504.31 574.24 574.24 51.72 -8,056.06 8,595.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 604.47 0.00 Prct Balance Used 24,670.27 7,000.00 31,670.27 1,056.76 2,029.67 521.00 9,763.80 11,766.00 11,744.00 2,682.00 39,563.23 130,521.42 26,901.00 3,515.00 3,063.86 6,395.90 389.93 40,265.69 45.99 0.00 39.88 43.94 49.26 36.46 23.72 16.55 41.67 41.66 32.18 47.13 41.35 0.00 41.35 39.06 41.36 38.78 -538.24 1,595.11 -538.24 1,595.11 98.28 -12,548.41 12,035.00 34.48 37.26 41.66 Page: 6 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 7 001 General Fund Account Number 1208-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total General Appropriations 1214 Prospective Expenditures • 1214-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1214-4322 Unclassified Total Prospective Expenditures 1299 Interfund Transfers Out • 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1299-4399 OperatingTransfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 2101 Police 2101-4100 2101-4102 2101-4105 2101-4106 2101-4111 2101-4117 2101-4118 2101-4180 2101-4187 2101-4188 2101-4189 Personal Services Regular Salaries Special Duty Pay Regular Overtime Accrual Cash In Shift Differential Training Officer Retirement Uniform Allowance Employee Benefits Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 2101-4200 Contract Services 2101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2101-4251 Contract Service/Govt Adjusted Appropriation Expenditures 2,351.00 3,131.00 68,937.00 196.00 996.72 6,138.88 Year-to-date Expenditures 980.00 1,570.66 27,649.21 Year-to-date Encumbrances 0.00 604.47 604.47 Prct Balance Used 1,371.00 41.68 955.87 69.47 40,683.32 40.98 68,807.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,807.00 0.00 68,807.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,807.00 0.00 734,273.00 734,273.00 3,222,230.00 54,704.00 210,000.00 548,354.00 6,157.00 5,872.00 1,408,803.00 29,700.00 529,582.00 34,555.00 6,049,957.00 77,182.00 314,400.00 60,989.00 60,989.00 307,345.00 307,345.00 263,351.05 1,264,258.76 5,209.59 25,528.15 14,244.52 87,963.75 33,807.65 425,649.67 443.76 2,207.79 0.00 208.94 117,279.20 561,268.66 2,318.54 11,592.70 27,429.59 136,522.62 3,112.71 18,870.13 467,196.61 2,534,071.17 1,093.60 0.00 16,165.15 155,513.68 0.00 0.00 426,928.00 426,928.00 41.86 41.86 0.00 1,957,971.24 39.24 0.00 29,175.85 46.67 0.00 122,036.25 41.89 0.00 122,704.33 77.62 0.00 3,949.21 35.86 0.00 5,663.06 3.56 0.00 847,534.34 39.84 0.00 18,107.30 39.03 0.00 393,059.38 25.78 0.00 15,684.87 54.61 0.00 3,515,885.83 41.89 0.00 61,016.85 20.94 155,200.00 3,686.32 98.83 Page: 7 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report Page: 8 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used Total Contract Services 391,582.00 1,093.60 171,678.83 155,200.00 64,703.17 83.48 2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 01-4304 Telephone 60,000.00 4,931.08 23,436.21 0.00 36,563.79 39.06 X1101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 18,000.00 2,256.058,617.44 238.37 9,144.19 49.20 2101-4306 Prisoner Maintenance 7,500.00 385.72 3,393.58 0.00 4,106.42 45.25 2101-4307 Radio Maintenance 3,500.00 0.00 526.66 0.00 2,973.34 15.05 2101-4309 Maintenance Materials 4,398.00 107.16 767.41 0.00 3,630.59 17.45 2101-4312 Travel Expense , POST 5,000.00 891.00 4,266.98 0.00 733.02 85.34 2101-4313 Travel Expense, STC 2,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,600.00 0.00 2101-4314 Uniforms 13,000.00 15.63 3,516.77 0.00 9,483.23 27.05 2101-4315 Membership 1,750.00 400.00 675.00 0.00 1,075.00 38.57 2101-4317 Conference/Training 14,800.00 504.68 1,915.43 0.00 12,884.57 12.94 2101-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 37,086.00 3,091.00 15,455.00 0.00 21,631.00 41.67 2101-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 231,211.00 19,268.00 96,340.00 0.00 134,871.00 41.67 2101-4396 Insurance User Charges 635,134.00 52,928.00 264,640.00 0.00 370,494.00 41.67 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1,033,979.00 84,778.32 423,550.48 238.37 610,190.15 40.99 2101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2101-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 1,402.00 0.00 1,117.24 Total Equipment/Fumiture 1,402.00 0.00 1,117.24 • Total Police 7,476,920.00 553,068.53 3,130,417.72 2102 Crossing Guard 2102-4200 Contract Services 2102-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Crossing Guard 2201 Fire 2201-4100 Personal Services 2201-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 0.00 155,438.37 62,210.00 6,220.98 15,484.62 46,725.38 62,210.00 6,220.98 15,484.62 46,725.38 1,739,619.00 284.76 284.76 4,191,063.91 79.69 79.69 43.95 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 151,369.90 711,955.44 0.00 1,027,663.56 40.93 Page: 8 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 9 001 General Fund Account Number 2201-4106 2201-4108 2201-4111 2201-4112 2201-4119 •2201-4180 2201-4187 2201-4188 2201-4189 • Regular Overtime FLSA Overtime Accrual Cash In Part Time/Temporary Fitness Incentive Retirement Uniform Allowance Employee Benefits Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 2201-4200 Contract Services 2201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2201-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 2201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2201-4304 2201-4305 2201-4309 2201-4314 2201-4315 2201-4317 2201-4390 2201-4395 2201-4396 Telephone Office Oper Supplies Maintenance Materials Uniforms Membership. Conference/Training Computer Replacement Chrgs Equip Replacement Charges Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2201-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 2201-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 2201-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Fire Adjusted Appropriation 309,012.00 183,846.00 261,479.00 41,000.00 8,400.00 763,166.00 12,000.00 222,671.00 27,998.00 3,569,191.00 62,270.00 41,776.00 104,046.00 11,550.00 11,066.00 21,000.00 5,600.00 3,370.00 27,275.00 33,451.00 143,246.00 239,308.00 495,866.00 11,520.00 28,172.00 39,692.00 4,208,795.00 Year-to-date Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances 28,370.19 137,305.23 13,018.12 66,458.92 10,314.82 154,669.02 2,950.00 14,900.00 3,800.00 3,800.00 68,808.96 319,888.39 950.00 4,818.37 16,694.57 85,244.59 2,349.87 10,708.52 298,626.43 1,509,748.48 1,736.44 0.00 1,736.44 13,113.29 22,457.00 35,570.29 942.89 5,483.13 595.52 3,498.07 2,155.85 7,694.13 252.66 1,538.33 0.00 2,883.06 906.76 4,321.20 2,788.00 13,940.00 11,937.00 59,685.00 19,942.00 99,710.00 39,520.68 198,752.92 1,093.08 3,304.41 8,368.81 11,462.11 9,461.89 14,766.52 349,345.44 1,758,838.21 Prot Balance Used 0.00 171,706.77 44.43 0.00 117,387.08 36.15 0.00 106,809.98 59.15 0.00 26,100.00 36.34 0.00 4,600.00 45.24 0.00 443,277.61 41.92 0.00 7,181.63 40.15 0.00 137,426.41 38.28 0.00 17,289.48 38.25 0.00 2,059,442.52 42.30 14,691.52 19,400.00 34,091.52 0.00 0.00 687.79 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,287.79 0.00 2,303.23 2,303.23 34,465.19 44.65 -81.00 100.19 34,384.19 66.95 6,066.87 47.47 7,567.93 31.61 12,618.08 39.91 3,461.67 38.18 486.94 85.55 22,953.80 15.84 19,511.00 41.67 83,561.00 41.67 139,598.00 41.67 295,825.29 40.34 8,215.59 28.68 14,406.66 48.86 22,622.25 43.01 37,682.54 2,412,274.25 42.68 Page: 9 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 10 001 General Fund Account Number 3104 Traffic Safety/St. Maint. 3104-4100 Personal Services •• 104-4102 Regular Salaries 3104-4106 Regular Overtime 3104-4111 Accrual Cash In 3104-4180 Retirement 3104-4188 Employee Benefits 3104-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 3104-4200 Contract Services 3104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3104-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3104-4303 Utilities 3104-4309 Maintenance Materials 3104-4395 Equip Replacement Charges .104-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Traffic Safety/St. Maint. 4101 Community Dev/Planning 4101-4100 Personal Services 4101-4102 Regular Salaries 4101-4111 Accrual Cash In 4101-4112 Part TimelTemporary 4101-4180 Retirement 4101-4188 Employee Benefits 4101-4189 Medicare Benefits Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 245,634.00 5,000.00 7,577.00 28,018.00 35,071.00 947.00 322,247.00 262,154.00 560.00 262,714.00 16,920.00 61,850.00 31,264.00 109,421.00 219,455.00 804,416.00 308,026.00 6,503.00 28,060.00 38,924.00 38,675.00 4,987.00 22,549.84 460.11 3,766.67 2,572.16 2,782.08 111.81 32,242.67 33,034.12 0.00 33,034.12 1,099.11 9,770.49 2,605.00 9,118.00 22,592.60 87,869.39 20,786.02 8,115.48 1,121.60 2,618.90 2,911.14 540.48 102,745.73 1,600.60 5,001.37 11,756.73 13,904.30 423.61 135,432.34 83,089.38 0.00 83,089.38 3,592.39 16,211.50 13,025.00 45,590.00 78,418.89 296,940.61 106,644.29 8,115.48 3,591.34 13,421.15 14,552.92 2,118.88 0.00 142,888.27 41.83 0.00 3,399.40 32.01 0.00 2,575.63 66.01 0.00 16,261.27 41.96 0.00 21,166.70 39.65 0.00 523.39 44.73 0.00 186,814.66 42.03 130,580.28 0.00 130,580.28 0.00 2,647.04 0.00 0.00 2,647.04 133,227.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,484.34 81.51 560.00 0.00 49,044.34 81.33 13,327.61 21.23 42,991.46 30.49 18,239.00 41.66 63,831.00 41.66 138,389.07 36.94 374,248.07 53.48 201,381.71 34.62 -1,612.48 124.80 24,468.66 12.80 25,502.85 34.48 24,122.08 37.63 2,868.12 42.49 Page: 10 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 11 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used Total Personal Services 425,175.00 36,093.62 148,444.06 0.00 276,730.94 34.91 4101-4200 Contract Services 4101-4201 Contract Sery/Private 46,167.00 1,866.00 19,718.75 0.00 26,448.25 42.71 Total Contract Services 46,167.00 1,866.00 19,718.75 0.00 26,448.25 42.71 • 4101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4101-4304 Telephone 1,000.00 169.68 694.31 0.00 305.69 69.43 4101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 7,700.00 331.01 2,031.93 0.00 5,668.07 26.39 4101-4315 Membership 1,360.00 0.00 470.00 0.00 890.00 34.56 4101-4317 Conference/Training 3,185.00 52.00 52.00 0.00 3,133.00 1.63 41.67 4101-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 20,316.00 1,693.00 8,465.00 0.00 11,851.00 4101-4396 Insurance User Charges 12,687.00 1,057.00 5,285.00 0.00 7,402.00 41.66 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 46,248.00 3,302.69 16,998.24 0.00 29,249.76 36.75 Total Community Dev/Planning 517,590.00 41,262.31 185,161.05 0.00 332,428.95 35.77 4201 Community Dev/Building 4201-4100 Personal Services 4201-4102 Regular Salaries 325,492.00 22,170.12 4201-4111 Accrual Cash In 4,833.00 6,202.26 4201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 8,643.00 2,229.34 4201-4180 Retirement 36,828.00 2,605.82 •4201-4188 Employee Benefits 35,596.00 2,832.18 4201-4189 Medicare Benefits 4,723.00 495.93 Total Personal Services 416,115.00 36,535.65 4201-4200 Contract Services 4201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 175,808.00 2,939.03 Total Contract Services 175,808.00 2,939.03 4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4201-4304 Telephone 2,675.00 320.21 114,661.76 6,202.26 12,576.99 13,491.72 14,160.70 2,233.73 163,327.16 21,471.11 21,471.11 1,293.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,600.56 3,600.56 210,830.24 -1,369.26 -3,933.99 23,336.28 21,435.30 2,489.27 252,787.84 150,736.33 150,736.33 35.23 128.33 145.52 36.63 39.78 47.29 39.25 14.26 14.26 0.00 1,381.19 48.37 Page: 11 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 12 001 General Fund Account Number 4201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 4201-4315 Membership 4201-4317 Conference/Training 801-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 01-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 4201-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4201-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 4201-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Community Dev/Building 4202 Public Works Administration 4202-4100 Personal Services 4202-4102 Regular Salaries 4202-4106 Regular Overtime 4202-4111 Accrual Cash In 4202-4180 Retirement 4202-4188 Employee Benefits .02-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 4202-4200 Contract Services 4202-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 4202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4202-4304 Telephone 4202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 4202-4314 Uniforms 4202-4315 Membership Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 6,600.00 1,970.00 3,500.00 32,381.00 19,530.00 25,006.00 91,662.00 268.41 0.00 20.00 2,698.00 1,627.00 2,084.00 7,017.62 2,305.42 50.00 605.00 13,490.00 8,135.00 10,420.00 36,299.23 450.00 0.00 0.00 450.00 0.00 0.00 684,035.00 46,492.30 221,097.50 147,822.00 5,000.00 5,361.00 16,781.00 18,885.00 2,145.00 195,994.00 35,851.00 35,851.00 17,600.00 7,500.00 8,000.00 1,500.00 15,418.99 243.44 2,697.71 1,751.89 1,854.63 267.21 22,233.87 -162.55 -162.55 1,524.87 1,290.76 371.68 0.00 64,957.76 1,469.59 2,789.48 7,377.33 7,604.37 1,008.65 85,207.18 6,391.15 6,391.15 5,781.42 3,759.27 1,964.63 85.00 116.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 116.62 0.00 0.00 4,177.96 36.70 1,920.00 2.54 2,895.00 17.29 18,891.00 41.66 11,395.00 41.65 14,586.00 41.67 55,246.15 39.73 450.00 0.00 450.00 0.00 3,717.18 459,220.32 32.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,880.67 6,880.67 85.19 34.15 0.00 0.00 82,864.24 43.94 3,530.41 29.39 2,571.52 52.03 9,403.67 43.96 11,280.63 40.27 1,136.35 47.02 110,786.82 43.47 22,579.18 37.02 22,579.18 37.02 11,733.39 33.33 3,706.58 50.58 6,035.37 24.56 1,415.00 5.67 Page: 12 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 13 001 General Fund Account Number 4202-4317 Conference/Training 4202-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 4202-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 4202-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Public Works Administration • 4204 Building Maintenance 4204-4100 Personal Services 4204-4102 Regular Salaries 4204-4106 Regular Overtime 4204-4111 Accrual Cash In 4204-4180 Retirement 4204-4188 Employee Benefits 4204-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 4204-4200 Contract Services 4204-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other •4204-4303 Utilities 4204-4309 Maintenance Materials 4204-4321 Building Sfty/Security 4204-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 4204-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 4204-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Building Maintenance 4601 Community Resources Adjusted Appropriation 7,007.00 81,843.00 15,144.00 70,434.00 209,028.00 440,873.00 83,292.00 2,500.00 3,164.00 9,521.00 15,335.00 320.00 114,132.00 161,100.00 161,100.00 136,026.00 23,000.00 6,000.00 4,450.00 8,954.00 12,530.00 190,960.00 466,192.00 Year-to-date Year-to-date Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances 77.00 6,820.00 1,262.00 5,870.00 17,216.31 39,287.63 5,052.04 296.71 2,202.34 578.44 882.63 0.00 9,012.16 10,817.71 10,817.71 6,875.20 1,403.71 173.86 371.00 746.00 1,044.00 10,613.77 30,443.64 117.00 34,100.00 6,310.00 29,350.00 81,467.32 173,065.65 25,260.18 686.15 2,202.34 2,892.05 4,413.14 0.00 35,453.86 44,072.43 44,072.43 38,912.00 11,719.34 1,030.98 1,855.00 3,730.00 5,220.00 62,467.32 141,993.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 119.34 7,000.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,345.00 11,345.00 0.00 827.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 827.30 12,172.30 Prct Balance Used 6,890.00 1.67 47,743.00 41.67 8,834.00 41.67 41,084.00 41.67 127,441.34 39.03 260,807.34 40.84 58,031.82 30.33 1,813.85 27.45 961.66 69.61 6,628.95 30.38 10,921.86 28.78 320.00 0.00 78,678.14 31.06 105,682.57 34.40 105,682.57 34.40 97,114.00 28.61 10,453.36 54.55 4,969.02 17.18 2,595.00 41.69 5,224.00 41.66 7,310.00 41.66 127,665.38 33.15 312,026.09 33.07 Page: 13 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 14 001 General Fund Account Number 4601-4100 Personal Services 4601-4102 Regular Salaries 001-4106 Regular Overtime 1-4111 Accrual Cash In 4601-4112 Part Time/Temporary 4601-4180 Retirement 4601-4188 Employee Benefits 4601-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 4601-4200 Contract Services 4601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4601-4221 Contract Rec Classes/Programs Total Contract Services 4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4601-4302 Advertising 4601-4304 Telephone 4601-4305 Office Oper Supplies 4601-4308 Program Materials 001-4309 Maintenance Materials 01-4315 Membership 4601-4317 Conference/Training 4601-4319 Special Events 4601-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 4601-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 4601-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4601-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 4601-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Furniture Total Community Resources Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 331,460.00 2,700.00 22,936.00 130,000.00 36,809.00 40,630.00 14,796.00 579,331.00 66,220.00 197,000.00 263,220.00 28,500.00 9,220.00 9,000.00 21,120.00 2,000.00 1,100.00 5,000.00 0.00 44,945.00 15,925.00 40,892.00 177,702.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 1,029,253.00 10,497.16 56,543.25 -600.00 -515.38 3,566.77 3,951.88 12,337.41 82,012.48 1,410.31 7,728.34 986.51 5,740.49 821.12 5,197.56 29,019.28 160,658.62 9,375.79 23,797.26 33,680.80 126,001.45 43,056.59 149,798.71 0.00 8,454.63 843.12 3,200.87 540.19 5,518.89 2,335.43 9,550.90 19.91 19.91 0.00 605.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 3,745.00 18,725.00 1,327.00 6,635.00 3,408.00 17,040.00 22,218.65 79,750.20 600.36 600.36 94,894.88 1,139.04 1,139.04 391,346.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 618.50 1,080.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,699.16 3,169.00 3,169.00 4,868.16 274,916.75 3,215.38 18,984.12 47,987.52 29,080.66 34,889.51 9,598.44 418,672.38 42,422.74 70,998.55 113,421.29 20,045.37 6,019.13 2,862.61 10,488.44 1,980.09 495.00 5,000.00 -10,000.00 26,220.00 9,290.00 23,852.00 96,252.64 4,691.96 4,691.96 633,038.27 17.06 19.09 17.23 63.09 21.00 14.13 35.13 27.73 35.94 63.96 56.91 29.67 34.72 68.19 50.34 1.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 41.66 41.66 41.67 45.83 47.87 47.87 38.50 Page: 14 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 15 001 General Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 6101 Parks 6101-4100 Personal Services 6101-4102 Regular Salaries •6101-4106 Regular Overtime 6101-4111 Accrual Cash In 6101-4180 Retirement 6101-4188 Employee Benefits 6101-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 6101-4200 Contract Services 6101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 6101-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 6101-4303 Utilities 6101-4309 Maintenance Materials 6101-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 6101-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other • 6101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 6101-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Parks 8534 Park Improvements 8534-4200 Contract Services 104,318.00 2,000.00 4,833.00 11,940.00 15,906.00 560.00 139,557.00 215,458.00 84.00 215,542.00 130,000.00 26,400.00 20,591.00 17,683.00 194,674.00 2,215.00 2,215.00 551,988.00 8,642.30 43,211.41 196.71 779.05 2,801.46 2,801.46 989.32 4,946.30 1,246.58 6,233.10 90.11 282.56 13,966.48 58,253.88 20,949.21 75,788.42 0.00 0.00 20,949.21 75,788.42 10,420.20 49,776.50 393.14 6,416.33 1,716.00 8,580.00 1,474.00 7,370.00 14,003.34 72,142.83 0.00 1,451.63 0.00 1,451.63 48,919.03 207,636.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 134,645.58 0.00 • 134,645.58 0.00 5,501.25 0.00 0.00 5,501.25 0.00 0.00 140,146.83 61,106.59 1,220.95 2,031.54 6,993.70 9,672.90 277.44 81,303.12 5,024.00 84.00 5,108.00 80,223.50 14,482.42 12,011.00 10,313.00 117,029.92 763.37 763.37 204,204.41 41.42 38.95 57.97 41.43 39.19 50.46 41.74 97.67 _ 0.00 97.63 38.29 45.14 41.67 41.68 39.88 65.54 65.54 63.01 8534-4201 Contract Serv/Private 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 Page: 15 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 16 001 General Fund Account Number Total Park Improvements 8622 ADA Compliance, City Hall 022-5400 Equipment/Furniture 8622-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture 8622-5600 Buildings/Improvements 8622-5602 Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs Total Buildings/Improvements Total ADA Compliance, City Hall 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase III 8630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Pier Renovation/Phase III Total General Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 4,813.00 4,813.00 0.00 0.00 4,813.00 277,724.00 277,724.00 19,300,282.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,812.60 4,812.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 99.99 0.00 0.40 99.99 1,531.91 1,531.91 -1,531.91 0.00 -1,531.91 0.00 0.00 4,812.60 1,531.91 -1,531.51 131.82 0.00 0.00 1,531,738.99 0.00 0.00 7,605,027.68 0.00 0.00 579,320.01 277,724.00 277,724.00 11,115.934.31 0.00 0.00 42.41 Page: 16 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 17 105 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1299-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out .2601 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 2601-4100 2601-4102 2601-4106 2601-4111 2601-4180 2601-4188 2601-4189 Personal Services Regular Salaries Regular Overtime Accrual Cash In Retirement Employee Benefits Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 2601-4200 Contract Services 2601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2601-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 2601-4300 • 2601-4303 2601-4309 2601-4395 2601-4396 Materials/Supplies/Other Utilities Maintenance Materials Equip Replacement Charges Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians Total Lightq/Landscapg Dist Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 17,198.00 17,198.00 171,980.00 2,200.00 6,239.00 19,571.00 23,058.00 2,266.00 225,314.00 43,600.00 21,700.00 65,300.00 109,410.00 28,300.00 33,570.00 39,136.00 210,416.00 501,030.00 518,228.00 1,433.00 1,433.00 16,354.84 84.31 6,653.78 1,861.66 2,077.82 316.97 27,349.38 3,175.00 1,019.05 4,194.05 12,731.12 362.07 2,798.00 3,261.00 19,152.19 50,695.62 52,128.62 7,165.00 7,165.00 72,588.80 2,085.33 8,163.63 8,261.89 10,383.04 1,111.80 102,594.49 12,700.00 2,212.76 14,912.76 51,457.31 5,569.45 13,990.00 16,305.00 87,321.76 204,829.01 211,994.01 0.00 10,033.00 41.66 0.00 10,033.00 41.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,400.00 13,631.45 39,031.45 0.00 194.85 0.00 0.00 194.85 39,226.30 39,226.30 99,391.20 114.67 -1,924.63 11,309.11 12,674.96 1,154.20 122,719.51 5,500.00 5,855.79 11,355.79 57,952.69 22, 535.70 19,580.00 22,831.00 122,899.39 256,974.69 267,007.69 42.21 94.79 130.85 42.21 45.03 49.06 45.53 87.39 73.01 82.61 47.03 20.37 41.67 41.66 41.59 48.71 48.48 Page: 17 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 18 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 099-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 3301 Downtown Enhancement 3301-4100 Personal Services 3301-4102 Regular Salaries 3301-4106 Regular Overtime 3301-4111 Accrual Cash In 3301-4180 Retirement 3301-4188 Employee Benefits 3301-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 3301-4200 Contract Services 3301-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 301-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3301-4309 Maintenance Materials 3301-4319 Special Events 3301-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 3301-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3301-4900 Depreciation 3301-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equip 3301-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs Total Depreciation Total Downtown Enhancement Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 3,565.00 297.00 1,485.00 3,565.00 297.00 1,485.00 0.00 2,080.00 41.65 0.00 2,080.00 41.65 35,647.00 1,200.00 1,933.00 4,013.00 4,441.00 422.00 47,656.00 155,361.00 155,361.00 2,000.00 56,040.00 401.00 3,061.00 61,502.00 1,328.00 3,830.00 5,158.00 269,677.00 3,950.41 0.00 991.66 446.14 362.35 62.31 5,812.87 21,774.78 21,774.78 32.01 6,820.26 33.00 255.00 7,140.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,727.92 15,493.84 5.84 991.66 1,745.44 1,811.90 199.00 20,247.68 59,881.95 59,881.95 269.96 38,484.16 165.00 1,275.00 40,194.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 120,323.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,153.16 1,194.16 941.34 2,267.56 2,629.10 223.00 27,408.32 43.46 0.49 51.30 43.49 40.80 47.16 42.49 95,078.01 401.04 99.74 95,078.01 401.04 99.74 0.00 830.00 0.00 0.00 830.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95,908.01 1,730.04 16,725.84 236.00 1,786.00 20,477.88 1,328.00 3,830.00 5,158.00 53,445.24 13.50 70.15 41.15 41.65 66.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.18 Page: 18 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 19 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund Account Number 3304 North Pier Parking Structure 3304-4200 Contract Services 3304-4201Contract Serv/Private • 3304-4231 Contract Serv/Pkg Lot Operator Total Contract Services 3304-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other • 3304-4303 Utilities 3304-4304 Telephone 3304-4309 Maintenance Materials Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3304-4900 Depreciation 3304-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs Total Depreciation Total North Pier Parking Structure 3305 Downtown Parking Lot A 3305-4200 Contract Services 3305-4231 Contract Serv/Pkg Lot Operator Total Downtown Parking Lot A 3306 Co. Share Pkg Structure Rev. 3306-4200 Contract Services 3306-4251 Contract Services/Govt Total Co. Share Pkg Structure Rev. 3307 Lifeguard Serv/Beach Maint 3307-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 26,654.00 204,036.00 230,690.00 37,000.00 450.00 4,100.00 41,550.00 112,500.00 112,500.00 384,740.00 147,674.00 147,674.00 202,380.00 202,380.00 450.00 0.00 450.00 2,110.04 30.96 0.00 2,141.00 0.00 0.00 15,521.02 28,700.14 44,221.16 9,626.94 123.52 1,310.12 11,060.58 0.00 0.00 2,591.00 55,281.74 0.00 0.00 23,415.20 23,415.20 3,550.00 175,335.86 178,885.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 178,885.86 124,258.80 124,258.80 7,582.98 0.00 7,582.98 27,373.06 326.48 2,789.88 30,489.42 112,500.00 112,500.00 150,572.40 71.55 100.00 96.71 26.02 27.45 31.95 26.62 0.00 0.00 60.86 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202,380.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 19 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 20 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund Account Number 3307-4251 Contract Services/Govt Total Lifeguard Serv/Beach Maint I* 108 2nd Street Resurfacing 108-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 55,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55,000.00 0.00 55,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55,000.00 0.00 8108-4201 Contract Serv/Private 6,748.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,748.00 0.00 Total 2nd Street Resurfacing 6,748.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,748.00 0.00 8140 11th PI Street Parking Imp 8140-4100 Personal Services 8140-4102 Regular Salaries 8140-4180 Retirement 8140-4188 Employee Benefits 8140-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 8140-4200 Contract Services 8140-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services • Total 11th PI Street Parking Imp Total Downtown Enhancement Fund 11,334.00 1,291.00 1,210.00 165.00 14,000.00 447,288.00 447,288.00 461,288.00 1,531,072.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,615.92 14,625.06 1,665.50 2,210.13 212.06 18,712.75 0.00 0.00 18,712.75 219,218.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,880.00 1,880.00 1,880.00 400,932.67 -3,291.06 129.04 -374.50 129.01 -1,000.13 182.66 -47.06 128.52 -4,712.75 133.66 445,408.00 0.42 445,408.00 0.42 440,695.25 4.46 910,920.89 40.50 Page: 20 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 21 110 Parking Fund Account Number 1204 Finance Cashier 1204-4100 Personal Services 1204-4102 Regular Salaries •1204-4106 Regular Overtime 1204-4111 Accrual Cash In 1204-4180 Retirement 1204-4188 Employee Benefits 1204-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1204-4200 Contract Services 1204-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 1204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1204-4304 Telephone 1204-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1204-4315 Membership 1204-4317 Conference/Training 1204-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 1204-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1204-4900 Depreciation Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 273,397.00 500.00 4,042.00 31,062.00 44,826.00 2,658.00 356,485.00 26,763.00 26,763.00 1,944.00 25,605.00 175.00 3,094.00 54,430.00 11,122.00 96,370.00 23,993.00 0.00 1,408.58 2,726.38 3,509.14 221.24 31,858.34 949.95 949.95 271.75 322.84 0.00 0.00 4,536.00 927.00 6,057.59 111,989.23 0.00 1,408.58 12,723.74 17,551.89 1,106.24 144,779.68 11,937.14 11,937.14 883.88 6,681.17 0.00 695.00 22,680.00 4,635.00 35,575.05 1204-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equip 850.00 0.00 0.00 Total Depreciation 850.00 0.00 0.00 Total Finance Cashier 480,468.00 38,865.88 192,291.87 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 161,407.77 500.00 2,633.42 18, 338.26 27,274.11 1,551.76 211,705.32 40.96 0.00 34.85 40.96 39.16 41.62 40.61 0.00 14,825.86 44.60 0.00 14,825.86 44.60 0.00 5,359.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,359.92 0.00 0.00 5,359.92 1,060.12 13,563.91 175.00 2,399.00 31,750.00 6,487.00 55,435.03 850.00 850.00 282,816.21 45.47 47.03 0.00 22.46 41.67 41.67 42.48 0.00 0.00 41.14 Page: 21 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 22 110 Parking Fund Account Number 1299-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 3302 Community Services 002-4100 Personal Services 3302-4102 Regular Salaries 3302-4106 Regular Overtime 3302-4111 Accrual Cash In 3302-4112 Part Time/Temporary 3302-4117 Shift Differential 3302-4118 Field Training Officer 3302-4180 Retirement 3302-4187 Uniform Allowance 3302-4188 Employee Benefits 3302-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 3302-4200 Contract Services 3302-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3302-4251 Contract Services/Govt Total Contract Services *302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3302-4304 Telephone 3302-4305 Office Oper Supplies 3302-4307 Radio Maintenance 3302-4309 Maintenance Materials 3302-4314 Uniforms 3302-4315 Membership 3302-4317 Conference/Training 3302-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 3302-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 3302-4396 Insurance User Charges Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1,200,425.00 1,200,425.00 675,668.00 4,000.00 41,214.00 6,912.00 5,325.00 500.00 122,205.00 5,880.00 96,017.00 5,918.00 963,639.00 9,835.00 40,600.00 50,435.00 3,000.00 5,000.00 1,000.00 14,000.00 2,000.00 375.00 3,550.00 58,801.00 66,688.00 111,167.00 100,035.00 100,035.00 500,175.00 500,175.00 52,161.06 270,766.39 0.00 3,380.04 0.00 14,119.74 221.55 1,307.15 361.92 1,853.76 0.00 152.00 9,148.86 46,398.94 418.32 2,233.52 7,481.82 37,406.97 509.63 2,690.86 70,303.16 380,309.37 370.00 3,146.65 231.32 20,576.95 601.32 23,723.60 339.32 1,100.78 109.22 4,311.52 0.00 0.00 31.13 2,715.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 488.21 4,900.00 24,500.00 5,557.00 27,785.00 9,264.00 46,320.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,400.00 19,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 700,250.00 700,250.00 404,901.61 619.96 27,094.26 5,604.85 3,471.24 348.00 75,806.06 3,646.48 58,610.03 3,227.14 583,329.63 6,688.35 623.05 7,311.40 1,899.22 688.48 1,000.00 11,284.79 2,000.00 375.00 3,061.79 34,301.00 38,903.00 64,847.00 41.67 41.67 40.07 84.50 34.26 18.91 34.81 30.40 37.97 37.99 38.96 45.47 39.47 31.99 98.47 85.50 36.69 86.23 0.00 19.39 0.00 0.00 13.75 41.67 41.66 41.67 Page: 22 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 23 110 Parking Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prot Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used Total Materials/Supplies/Other 265,581.00 3302-4900 Depreciation 3302-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equip 3302-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs 4110 3302-5400 Equipment/Fumiture Total Depreciation 3302-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Community Services 8140 11th PI Street Parking Imp 8140-4200 Contract Services 8140-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total 11th PI Street Parking Imp Total Parking Fund 2,795.00 1,600.00 4,395.00 200.00 200.00 1,284,250.00 20,200.67 107,220.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91,105.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 511,253.69 15,112.00 0.00 0.00 15,112.00 0.00 0.00 2,980,255.00 230,006.03 1,203,720.56 0.00 158,360.28 40.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,400.00 2,795.00 1,600.00 4,395.00 200.00 200.00 753,596.31 0.00 15,112.00 0.00 15,112.00 24,759.92 1,751,774.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.32 0.00 0.00 41.22 Page: 23 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 24 115 State Gas Tax Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 111199-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total State Gas Tax Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 357,151.00 357,151.00 29,763.00 29,763.00 148,815.00 148,815.00 0.00 0.00 208,336.00 208,336.00 41.67 41.67 Page: 24 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 25 117 AB939 Fund Account Number 5301 Source Redctn/Recycle Element 5301-4100 Personal Services 5301-4102Regular Salaries •5301-4111 Accrual Cash In 5301-4180 Retirement 5301-4188 Employee Benefits 5301-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 5301-4200 Contract Services 5301-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 5301-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 5301-4305 Office Oper Supplies 5301-4315 Membership Total Materials/Supplies/Other 5301-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 5301-5499 Non -Capitalized Assets Total Equipment/Fumiture • Total AB939 Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 20,416.00 1,845.00 2,258.00 2,730.00 297.00 27,546.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 1,500.00 3,500.00 5,000.00 40,000.00 40,000.00 82,546.00 1,672.42 625.25 188.59 157.95 33.97 2,678.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,653.30 12,653.30 15,331.48 8,363.01 625.25 943.05 996.59 133.63 11,061.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,966.81 33,966.81 45,028.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,052.99 40.96 1,219.75 33.89 1,314.95 41.76 1,733.41 36.51 163.37 44.99 16,484.47 40.16 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 6,033.19 84.92 6,033.19 84.92 0.00 37,517.66 54.55 Page: 25 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 26 119 Compensated Absences Fund Account Number 1299 interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 099-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Materials/Supplies/Other • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 63,732.00 63,732.00 5,311.00 5,311.00 26,555.00 26,555.00 0.00 0.00 37,177.00 41.67 37,177.00 41.67 Total Compensated Absences Fund 63,732.00 5,311.00 26,555.00 0.00 37,177.00 41.67 Page: 26 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 27 121 Prop A Open Space Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1299-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out •8630 Pier Renovation/Phase III 8630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Pier Renovation/Phase III Total Prop A Open Space Fund • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 20,557.00 1,713.00 8,565.00 0.00 11,992.00 41.66 20,557.00 1,713.00 8,565.00 0.00 11,992.00 41.66 221,743.00 221,743.00 242,300.00 . 0.00 0.00 221,743.00 0.00 0.00 221,743.00 1,713.00 8,565.00 221,743.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 11,992.00 95.05 Page: 27 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 28 122 Tyco Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other .299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase III 8630-4100 Personal Services 8630-4102 Regular Salaries 8630-4180 Retirement 8630-4188 Employee Benefits 8630-4189 Fica Total Personal Services 8630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Pier Renovation/Phase 111 Total Tyco Fund • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 275,000.00 275,000.00 32,383.00 3,690.00 3,459.00 468.00 40,000.00 2,166,740.00 2,166,740.00 2,206,740.00 2,481,740.00 22,917.00 22,917.00 1,535.30 174.79 75.41 22.22 1,807.72 60,962.93 60,962.93 62,770.65 85,687.65 114,585.00 114,585.00 9,557.71 1,088.20 706.07 138.37 11,490.35 60,962.93 60,962.93 72,453.28 187,038.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,845,037.07 1,845,037.07 1,845,037.07 1,845,037.07 160,415.00 160,415.00 41.67 41.67 22,825.29 29.51 2,601.80 29.49 2,752.93 20.41 329.63 29.57 28,509.65 28.73 260,740.00 87.97 260,740.00 87.97 289,249.65 86.89 449,664.65 81.88 Page: 28 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 29 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund Account Number 8534 Park Improvements 8534-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 8534-4201 Contract Sery/Private 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 Total Park Improvements 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 •8630 Pier Renovation/Phase III • 8630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Pier Renovation/Phase 111 Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 150,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 85,238.00 54,762.00 63.49 150,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 85,238.00 54,762.00 63.49 165,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 85,238.00 69,762.00 57.72 Page: 29 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 30 136 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund Account Number 1219 Administrative Charges 1219-4200 Contract Services .19-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Administrative Charges 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1,807.00 0.00 392.11 0.00 1,414.89 21.70 1,807.00 0.00 392.11 0.00 1,414.89 21.70 1299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 1,057.00 88.00 440.00 0.00 617.00 41.63 Total Interfund Transfers Out 1,057.00 88.00 440.00 0.00 617.00 41.63 Total Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 2,864.00 88.00 832.11 0.00 2,031.89 29.05 • Page: 30 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 31 137 Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund Account Number • 1219 Administrative Charges 1219-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 5,861.00 0.00 4,146.36 0.00 1,714.64 70.74 Total Administrative Charges 5,861.00 0.00 4,146.36 0.00 1,714.64 70.74 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1299-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 3,063.00 255.00 3,063.00 255.00 1,275.00 1,275.00 0.00 0.00 1,788.00 41.63 1,788.00 41.63 Total Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund 8,924.00 255.00 5,421.36 0.00 3,502.64 60.75 Page: 31 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 32 138 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund Account Number 1219 Administrative Charges 1219-4200 Contract Services *219-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Administrative Charges 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1299-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 6,355.00 6,355.00 3,500.00 0.00 4,159.02 0.00 4,159.02 292.00 3,500.00 292.00 1,460.00 1,460.00 0.00 2,195.98 65.44 0.00 2,195.98 65.44 0.00 0.00 2,040.00 41.71 2,040.00 41.71 Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 9,855.00 292.00 5,619.02 0.00 4,235.98 57.02 Page: 32 • expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 33 139 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund Account Number 1219 Administrative Charges 1219-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00 401.33 0.00 -401.33 0.00 Total Administrative Charges 0.00 0.00 401.33 0.00 -401.33 0.00 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Interfund Transfers Out Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401.33 0.00 -401.33 0.00 Page: 33 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 34 140 Community Dev Block Grant Account Number 4707 CDBG Program General Admin 4707-4200 Contract Services *707-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 4707-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4707-4317 Training/Conference Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total CDBG Program General Admin 8626 ADA Comp/Comm Ctr Theatre 8626-4200 Contract Services 8626-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total ADA Comp/Comm Ctr Theatre Total Community Dev Block Grant • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 11,000.00 11,000.00 300.00 300.00 11,300.00 148,222.00 148,222.00 159,522.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,794.00 4,794.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,206.00 43.58 6,206.00 43.58 300.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 4,794.00 0.00 6,506.00 42.42 3,068.50 3,068.50 5,933.00 5,933.00 3,068.50 10,727.00 48,430.00 48,430.00 48,430.00 93,859.00 93,859.00 100,365.00 36.68 36.68 37.08 Page: 34 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 35 145 Proposition A Fund Account Number 3401 Dial A Ride 3401-4100 Personal Services 3401-4102 Regular Salaries Total Personal Services • 3401-4200 Contract Services 3401-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 3401-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3401-4305 Office Oper Supplies Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Dial A Ride 3403 Bus Pass Subsidy 3403-4200 Contract Services 3403-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Bus Pass Subsidy 3404 Dial -A -Taxi Program • 3404-4200 Contract Services 3404-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Dial -A -Taxi Program 3408 Commuter Express 3408-4100 Personal Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 34,255.00 2,704.56 13,644.54 0.00 20,610.46 39.83 34,255.00 2,704.56 13,644.54 0.00 20,610.46 39.83 233,448.00 0.00 58,611.03 0.00 174,836.97 25.11 233,448.00 0.00 58,611.03 0.00 174,836.97 25.11 850.00 0.36 2.82 0.00 847.18 0.33 850.00 0.36 2.82 0.00 847.18 0.33 268,553.00 2,704.92 72,258.39 0.00 196,294.61 26.91 1,000.00 108.00 472.00 0.00 528.00 47.20 1,000.00 108.00 472.00 0.00 528.00 47.20 25,000.00 0.00 9,524.80 15,475.20 0.00 100.00 25,000.00 0.00 9,524.80 15,475.20 0.00 100.00 3408-4102 Regular Salaries 1,448.00 105.96 550.98 0.00 897.02 38.05 Total Personal Services 1,448.00 105.96 550.98 0.00 897.02 38.05 Page: 35 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 36 145 Proposition A Fund Account Number 3408-4200 Contract Services 3408-4251 Contract Service/Govt • Total Contract Services Total Commuter Express 3409 Recreation Transportation 3409-4100 Personal Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 9,654.00 9,654.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,654.00 0.00 9,654.00 0.00 11,102.00 105.96 550.98 0.00 10,551.02 4.96 3409-4102 Regular Salaries 3,124.00 Total Personal Services 3,124.00 3409-4200 Contract Services 3409-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Recreation Transportation 8116 Pier Ave/Hermosa Ave to PCH 8116-4200 Contract Services 40116-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Pier Ave/Hermosa Ave to PCH Total Proposition A Fund • 21,400.00 21,400.00 24,524.00 187.34 187.34 739.43 739.43 857.08 857.08 8,320.59 8,320.59 0.00 0.00 375.00 375.00 926.77 9,177.67 375.00 2,266.92 27.44 2,266.92 27.44 12,704.41 40.63 12,704.41 40.63 14,971.33 38.95 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 390,179.00 3,845.65 91,983.84 15,850.20 282.344.96 27.64 Page: 36 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 37 146 Proposition C Fund Account Number 8116 Pier Ave/Hermosa Ave to PCH 8116-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 8116-4201 Contract Sery/Private 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 Total Proposition C Fund 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 • • Page: 37 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 38 150 Grants Fund Account Number 2112 Local Law Enf Block Grant (LLEBG) 2112-5400 Equipment/Furniture 12-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 2112-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 Total Local Law Enf Block Grant (LLEBG) 2113 State Homeland Security Grant 2004 2113-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2113-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 2113-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 Total State Homeland Security Grant 2004 3102 Sewers/Beverage Recycle Grant 3102-4200 Contract Services 3102-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Sewers/Beverage Recycle Grant 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase III 630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Pier Renovation/Phase III Total Grants Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 268.00 9,000.00 9,268.00 3,344.00 30,760.00 34,104.00 0.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 168.22 4,971.55 5,139.77 0.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 1,105.72 9,951.05 11,056.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,164.72 374.53 2,539.25 268.00 0.00 268.00 73.56 20,434.42 20,507.98 0.00 100.00 97.11 97.80 33.57 39.87 12,449.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,449.00 0.00 12,449.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,449.00 0.00 595,991.00 595,991.00 651,812.00 0.00 0.00 595,991.00 0.00 0.00 595,991.00 14,139.77 20,056.77 598,530.25 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 33,224.98 94.90 Page: 38 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 39 151 Ofc of Traffic Sfty Grant Fund Account Number 2114 Ticket Writer/Traffic Mgmt Grant 2114-4200 Contract Services 2114-4201 Contract Sery/Private Total Contract Services 402114-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2114-4317 Training/Conference Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2114-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2114-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Ofc of Traffic Sftv Grant Fund • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 525,845.00 525,845.00 16,000.00 16,000.00 170,000.00 170,000.00 711,845.00 0.00 0.00 487,300.00 0.00 0.00 487,300.00 0.00 760.30 14,000.00 0.00 760.30 14,000.00 0.00 0.00 170,000.00 0.00 0.00 170,000.00 0.00 760.30 671,300.00 38,545.00 92.67 38,545.00 92.67 1,239.70 92.25 1,239.70 92.25 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 39.784.70 94.41 Page: 39 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 40 152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund Account Number 3701 Emission Control Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 3701-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other .01-4327 AQMD Incentives 1,000.00 30.00 260.00 0.00 740.00 26.00 Total Air Qualitv Mgmt Dist Fund 1,000.00 30.00 260.00 0.00 740.00 26.00 • Page: 40 expstat.rpt 12/1'5/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 41 153 Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) Account Number 2106 C.O.P.S. Program 2106-4200 Contract Services 2106-4251 Contract Services/Govt Total Contract Services • 2106-5400 Equipment/Furniture • 2106-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 2106-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 2106-5403 Vehicles Total Equipment/Furniture 2106-5600 Buildings/Improvements 2106-5601 Buildings Total Buildings/Improvements Total Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 10,000.00 10,000.00 5,000.00 93,875.00 11,644.00 110,519.00 71,624.00 71,624.00 192,143.00 0.00 9,199.49 0.00 800.51 91.99 0.00 9,199.49 0.00 800.51 91.99 0.00 1,271.90 0.00 1,271.90 0.00 0.00 1,271.90 3,804.99 3,453.15 1,643.51 8,901.65 0.00 0.00 572.64 0.00 0.00 572.64 0.00 0.00 18,101.14 572.64 622.37 90,421.85 10,000.49 101,044.71 71,624.00 71,624.00 173,469.22 87.55 3.68 14.11 8.57 0.00 0.00 9.72 Page: 41 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 42 154 CA Law Enf Equip Prog Fund (CLEEP) Account Number 2107 High Technology Grant 2107-5400 Equipment/Furniture 107-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 2107-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 2107-5403 Vehicles Total CA Law Enf Equip Proq Fund (CLEEP) • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 7,200.00 23,427.00 5,235.00 35,862.00 427.59 0.00 0.00 427.59 427.59 0.00 4,855.01 5,282.60 0.00 0.00 380.00 380.00 6,772.41 5.94 23,427.00 0.00 -0.01 100.00 30,199.40 15.79 Page: 42 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 43 156 Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prey (TRAP) Account Number 2115 T.R.A.P. Taskforce 2115-4100 Personal Services 2115-4102 Regular Salaries 2115-4105Special Duty Pay •2115-4106 Regular Overtime 2115-4180 Retirement 2115-4187 Uniform Allowance 2115-4188 Employee Benefits 2115-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Taskforce for Req Autotheft Prey (TRAP) • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 64,296.00 5,256.00 5,000.00 35,157.00 700.00 11,792.00 1,092.00 123,293.00 5,438.36 425.62 0.00 2,963.96 58.34 915.88 85.88 9,888.04 27,191.80 2,128.10 0.00 14,819.80 291.70 4,579.40 429.40 49,440.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,104.20 42.29 3,127.90 40.49 5,000.00 0.00 20,337.20 42.15 408.30 41.67 7,212.60 38.83 662.60 39.32 73,852.80 40.10 Page: 43 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18 PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 44 160 Sewer Fund Account Number 3102 Sewers/Storm Drains 3102-4100 Personal Services 102-4102 Regular Salaries 3102-4106 Regular Overtime 3102-4111 Accrual Cash In 3102-4112 Part Time/Temporary 3102-4180 Retirement 3102-4188 Employee Benefits 3102-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 3102-4200 Contract Services 3102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3102-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 3102-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3102-4303 Utilities 3102-4309Maintenance Materials .102-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 102-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Sewers/Storm Drains 3105 Used Oil Block Grant 3105-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 219,710.00 4,800.00 6,415.00 13,000.00 25,350.00 37,332.00 4,165.00 310,772.00 235,460.00 25,000.00 260,460.00 1,700.00 12,600.00 33,853.00 57,353.00 105,506.00 676,738.00 3105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 5,400.00 17,274.59 162.29 3,251.89 1,525.86 1,951.85 2,505.93 400.71 27,073.12 14,409.40 3,749.60 18,159.00 84.49 256.29 2,822.00 4,779.00 7,941.78 53,173.90 78,818.38 897.22 3,343.65 1,525.86 8,906.49 12,495.20 1,240.98 107,227.78 67,439.62 3,749.60 71,189.22 247.80 2,108.31 14,110.00 23,895.00 40,361.11 218,778.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 117,734.70 16,250.40 133,985.10 0.00 189.60 0.00 0.00 189.60 134,174.70 140,891.62 3,902.78 3,071.35 11,474.14 16,443.51 24,836.80 2,924.02 203,544.22 50,285.68 5,000.00 55,285.68 1,452.20 10,302.09 19,743.00 33,458.00 64,955.29 323,785.19 35.87 18.69 52.12 11.74 35.13 33.47 29.80 34.50 78.64 80.00 78.77 14.58 18.24 41.68 41.66 38.43 52.16 0.00 0.00 5,400.00 0.00 100.00 Total Used Oil Block Grant 5,400.00 0.00 0.00 5,400.00 0.00 100.00 8409 Manhole Repairs Page: 44 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 45 160 Sewer Fund Account Number 8409-4200 Contract Services 8409-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Manhole Repairs 8411 Sewer Rehab/Recons-Trgt Area 1 • 8411-4200 Contract Services 8411-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Sewer Rehab/Recons-Trgt Area 1 8412 Sewer Rehab/Recons-Trgt Area 2 8412-4200 Contract Services • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 244,315.00 244,315.00 0.00 5,850.00 7,193.75 231,271.25 0.00 5,850.00 7,193.75 231,271.25 5.34 5.34 2,200.00 0.00 0.00 2,200.00 0.00 100.00 2,200.00 0.00 0.00 2,200.00 0.00 100.00 8412-4201 Contract Serv/Private 76,290.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76,290.00 0.00 Total Sewer Rehab/Recons-Trgt Area 2 76,290.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76,290.00 0.00 8418 Upgrade of Pump Stations Citywide 8418-4100 Personal Services 8418-4102 Regular Salaries 8418-4180 Retirement 8418-4188 Employee Benefits 8418-4189 Fica Total Personal Services 8418-4200 Contract Services 8418-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Upgrade of Pump Stations Citywide 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase III 8630-4100 Personal Services 14,486.00 1,321.00 1,497.00 212.00 17,516.00 445,306.00 445,306.00 462,822.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,379.72 157.12 0.00 20.01 1,556.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,106.28 1,163.88 1,497.00 191.99 15,959.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 445,306.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 445,306.00 9.52 11.89 0.00 9.44 8.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,556.85 0.00 461,265.15 0.34 Page: 45 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 46 160 Sewer Fund Account Number 8630-4102 Regular Salaries 8630-4180 Retirement 8630-4188 Employee Benefits .630-4189 Fica Total Personal Services 8630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Pier Renovation/Phase 111 Total Sewer Fund • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 16,191.00 1,844.00 1,729.00 236.00 20,000.00 174,674.00 174,674.00 194,674.00 1,662,439.00 800.70 91.15 19.01 11.61 922.47 0.00 0.00 922.47 54,096.37 9,104.78 1,036.84 632.47 132.04 10,906.13 0.00 0.00 10,906.13 237,091.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 298,968.45 7,086.22 56.23 807.16 56.23 1,096.53 36.58 103.96 55.95 9,093.87 54.53 24,674.00 85.87 24,674.00 85.87 33,767.87 82.65 1.126.379.46 32.25 Page: 46 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 47 170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund Account Number 2103 L. A. Impact 2103-4100 Personal Services 2103-4102Regular Salaries • 2103-4105 Special Duty Pay 2103-4180 Retirement 2103-4187 Uniform Allowance 2103-4188 Employee Benefits 2103-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 70,152.00 5,256.00 38,088.00 700.00 10,115.00 1,104.00 125,415.00 5,911.26 425.62 3,200.66 58.34 514.52 92.74 10,203.14 29,556.30 2,128.10 16,003.30 291.70 3,108.26 507.84 51,595.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,595.70 42.13 3,127.90 40.49 22,084.70 42.02 408.30 41.67 7,006.74 30.73 596.16 46.00 73,819.50 41.14 Page: 47 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 48 180 Fire Protection Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 0299-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 2202 Fire Protection 2202-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2202-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 2202-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 Total Fire Protection 8610 Fire Sta Upstairs Remodel/Addn 8610-4200 Contract Services 8610-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Fire Sta Upstairs Remodel/Addn Total Fire Protection Fund • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 154,316.00 154,316.00 995.00 61,135.00 62,130.00 142,486.00 142,486.00 358,932.00 12,860.00 64,300.00 12,860.00 64,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,079.52 5,079.52 17,939.52 0.00 35,021.62 35,021.62 17,465.91 17,465.91 116,787.53 0.00 90,016.00 41.67 0.00 90,016.00 41.67 0.00 19,968.81 19,968.81 12,506.65 12,506.65 32,475.46 995.00 6,144.57 7,139.57 112,513.44 112,513.44 209,669.01 0.00 89.95 88.51 21.04 21.04 41.59 Page: 48 • • expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 49 198 Retirement Stabilization Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Retirement Stabilization Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 260,000.00 260,000.00 260,000.00 21,667.00 21,667.00 21,667.00 108,335.00 108,335.00 108,335.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 151,665.00 151,665.00 151,665.00 41.67 41.67 41.67 Page: 49 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 50 199 Contingency Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other *99-4399 Operating Trsfr Out Total Contingency Fund • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 32,457.00 2,705.00 13,525.00 0.00 18,932.00 41.67 32,457.00 2,705.00 13,525.00 0.00 18,932.00 41.67 Page: 50 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 51 301 Capital Improvement Fund Account Number 8106 Beach Drive Underground Dist 8106-4100 Personal Services 8106-4102 Regular Salaries 408106-4180 Retirement 8106-4188 Employee Benefits 8106-4189 Fica Total Personal Services 8106-4200 Contract Services 8106-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Beach Drive Underground Dist 8108 2nd Street Resurfacing 8108-4100 Personal Services 8108-4102 Regular Salaries 8108-4180 Retirement 8108-4188 Employee Benefits 8108-4189 Fica Total Personal Services 8108-4200 Contract Services 8108-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total 2nd Street Resurfacing 8112 St Improv/Slurry & Crack Sealing -Various 8112-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 4,048.00 461.00 432.00 59.00 5,000.00 100,442.00 100,442.00 105,442.00 17,001.00 1,937.00 1,816.00 246.00 21,000.00 436,992.00 436,992.00 457,992.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,048.00 461.00 432.00 59.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,600.00 0.00 96,842.00 3.58 0.00 3,600.00 0.00 96,842.00 3.58 0.00 3,600.00 0.00 101,842.00 3.41 4,139.18 471.38 573.01 60.02 5,243.59 5,380.93 612.77 941.36 78.02 7,013.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,620.07 1,324.23 874.64 167.98 13,986.92 139.02 139.02 0.00 436,852.98 139.02 139.02 0.00 436,852.98 5,382.61 7,152.10 0.00 450,839.90 31.65 31.64 51.84 31.72 33.40 0.03 0.03 1.56 8112-4201 Contract Serv/Private 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 Page: 51 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 52 301 Capital Improvement Fund Account Number Total St Improv/Slurry & Crack Sealing -Various 8113 St Improv/Concrete Rd Recons -Various 13-4200 Contract Services 8113-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total St Improv/Concrete Rd Recons -Various 8114 St Improv/Speed Humps -Various 8114-4200 Contract Services 8114-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total St Improv/Speed Humps -Various 8115 20th StNalley Dr to Power St. 8115-4200 Contract Services 8115-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total 20th StNalley Dr to Power St. 8117 Manhattan Avenue Street Improvements .117-4200 Contract Services 8117-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Manhattan Avenue Street Improvements 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase III 8630-4100 Personal Services 8630-4102 Regular Salaries 8630-4180 Retirement 8630-4188 Employee Benefits 8630-4189 Fica Total Personal Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prot Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 12,500.00 7,470.00 7,470.00 830.00 4,200.00 66.40 12,500.00 7,470.00 7,470.00 830.00 4,200.00 66.40 149,500.00 149,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 149,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 149,500.00 35,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,000.00 28,335.00 3,229.00 3,026.00 410.00 35,000.00 1,201.01 136.80 28.52 17.42 1,383.75 8,686.25 989.24 667.60 125.97 10,469.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,648.75 2,239.76 2,358.40 284.03 24,530.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.66 30.64 22.06 30.72 29.91 Page: 52 expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 12/15/2004 1:18PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 53 301 Capital Improvement Fund Account Number 8630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Pier Renovation/Phase III •8634 Exterior Painting/City Bldgs 8634-4200 Contract Services 8634-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Exterior Painting/City Bldgs Total Capital Improvement Fund • Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1,700,990.00 1,700,990.00 1,735,990.00 14,500.00 14,500.00 2,710,924.00 62,852.44 62,852.44 64,236.19 0.00 0.00 77,088.80 97,013.40 1,065,126.27 97,013.40 1,065,126.27 107,482.46 1,065,126.27 0.00 0.00 125,704.56 0.00 0.00 1,065,956.27 538,850.33 538,850.33 563,381.27 68.32 68.32 67.55 14,500.00 0.00 14,500.00 0.00 1,519,263.17 43.96 Page: 53 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 54 302 Artesia Blvd Relinquishment Account Number 3104 Traffic Safety/St. Maint. Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 3104-4200 Contract Services .04-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 Total Traffic Safety/St. Maint. 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 8630 Pier Renovation/Phase Ill 8630-4200 Contract Services 8630-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Pier Renovation/Phase Ill Total Artesia Blvd Relinquishment • 500,000.00 500,000.00 509,000.00 11,422.55 11,422.55 11,422.55 11,422.55 11,422.55 11,422.55 464,767.45 464,767.45 464,767.45 23,810.00 95.24 23,810.00 95.24 32.810.00 93.55 Page: 54 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM • • Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 55 309 Bayview Dr Utiltiy Undergrnding Dist Account Number 8104 Bayview Dr Underground Dist 8104-4200 Contract Services 8104-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Bayview Dr Utiltiv Undergrndinq Dist Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 45,000.00 45,000.00 4,334.89 4,334.89 4,334.89 40,665.11 0.00 100.00 4,334.89 40,665.11 0.00 100.00 Page: 55 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18 PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 56 310 Bonnie Brae Utility Undergrnding Dist Account Number 8105 Bonnie Brae Underground Dist Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 8105-4200 Contract Services •1054201 Contract Serv/Private 26,931.00 0.00 26,930.53 0.00 0.47 100.00 Total Bonnie Brae Utility Undergrnding Dist 26,931.00 0.00 26,930.53 0.00 0.47 100.00 • Page: 56 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 57 311 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Improvmnt Fund Account Number 1299 Interfund Transfers Out 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1299-4399 Operating Transfers Out Total Interfund Transfers Out • 8106 Beach Drive Underground Dist • 8106-4200 Contract Services 8106-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Beach Drive Underground Dist Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Improvmnt Fund Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 460,869.00 460,869.00 463,369.00 0.00 385,595.50 0.00 385,595.50 0.00 388,095.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 75,273.50 75,273.50 75,273.50 83.67 83.67 83.76 Page: 57 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 58 705 Insurance Fund Account Number 1209 Liability Insurance 1209-4100 Personal Services 10209-4102 Regular Salaries 1209-4111 Accrual Cash In 1209-4180 Retirement 1209-4188 Employee Benefits 1209-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1209-4200 Contract Services 1209-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 1209-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1209-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1209-4315 Membership 1209-4317 Conference/Training 1209-4324 Claims/Settlements Total Materials/Supplies/Other • Total Liability Insurance 1210 Auto/Property/Bonds 1210-4200 Contract Services 1210-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 1210-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1210-4324 Claims/Settlements Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Auto/Property/Bonds Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 41,730.00 1,933.00 4,633.00 5,837.00 606.00 54,739.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 500.00 350.00 1,200.00 350,000.00 352,050.00 731,789.00 42,874.00 42,874.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 52,874.00 5,627.22 0.00 630.92 569.65 82.73 6,910.52 0.00 0.00 1.15 100.00 0.00 50,200.48 50,301.63 57,212.15 18,754.05 0.00 2,086.01 2,565.58 277.57 23,683.21 306,199.00 306,199.00 10.51 100.00 0.00 143,827.10 143,937.61 473,819.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,975.95 1,933.00 2,546.99 3,271.42 328.43 31,055.79 44.94 0.00 45.03 43.95 45.80 43.27 18,801.00 94.22 18,801.00 94.22 489.49 250.00 1,200.00 206,172.90 208,112.39 257,969.18 2.10 28.57 0.00 41.09 40.89 64.75 0.00 37,852.00 0.00 5,022.00 88.29 0.00 37,852.00 0.00 5,022.00 88.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 37,852.00 0.00 15,022.00 71.59 Page: 58 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18 PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 59 705 Insurance Fund Account Number 1215 Unemployment 1215-4100 Personal Services 1215-4186 Unemployment Claims • 1217 Workers' Compensation Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 Total Unemployment 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 1217-4100 Personal Services 1217-4102 Regular Salaries 1217-4111 Accrual Cash In 1217-4180 Retirement 1217-4188 Employee Benefits 1217-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1217-4200 Contract Services 1217-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1217-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 1217-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other •1217-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1217-4317 Training/Conference 1217-4324 Claims/Settlements Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Workers' Compensation Total Insurance Fund 41,730.00 1,933.00 4,633.00 5,837.00 606.00 54,739.00 90,250.00 5,500.00 95,750.00 500.00 2,500.00 500,000.00 503,000.00 653,489.00 1,448,152.00 5,627.26 0.00 630.93 569.65 82.73 6,910.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.74 0.00 89,426.83 89,430.57 96,341.14 153,553.29 18,754.31 0.00 2,086.04 2,565.60 277.57 23,683.52 166,020.00 0.00 166,020.00 15.80 0.00 310,574.80 310,590.60 500,294.12 1,011,965.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,975.69 1,933.00 2,546.96 3,271.40 328.43 31,055.48 -75,770.00 5,500.00 -70,270.00 484.20 2,500.00 189,425.20 192,409.40 153,194.88 436,186.06 44.94 0.00 45.03 43.95 45.80 43.27 183.96 0.00 173.39 3.16 0.00 62.11 61.75 76.56 69.88 Page: 59 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 60 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 1101 City Council Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1101-4900 Depreciation • 101-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 5,204.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,204.00 0.00 Total City Council 5,204.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,204.00 0.00 1206 Information Systems 1206-4100 Personal Services 1206-4102 Regular Salaries 117,840.00 1206-4111 Accrual Cash In 6,151.00 1206-4180 Retirement 13,420.00 1206-4188 Employee Benefits 10,999.00 1206-4189 Medicare Benefits 1,709.00 Total Personal Services 150,119.00 1206-4200 Contract Services 1206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 171,140.00 Total Contract Services 171,140.00 1206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1206-4304 Telephone 5,371.00 1206-4305 Office Oper Supplies 8,716.00 1206-4309 Maintenance Materials 8,382.00 1206-4315 Membership 300.00 1206-4317 Conference/Training 9,700.00 1206-4396 Insurance User Charges 4,834.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 37,303.00 1206-4900 Depreciation 1206-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 94,396.00 Total Depreciation 94,396.00 9,820.00 49,100.00 1,019.77 1,019.77 1,118.32 5,591.60 867.52 4,337.60 157.18 726.78 12,982.79 60,775.75 3,086.52 80,338.78 3,086.52 80,338.78 426.87 1,912.04 1.02 3,247.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 403.00 2,015.00 830.89 7,174.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,149.60 1,149.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,740.00 5,131.23 7,828.40 6,661.40 982.22 89,343.25 89,651.62 89,651.62 3,458.96 5,468.43 8,382.00 300.00 9,700.00 2,819.00 30,128.39 94,396.00 94,396.00 41.67 16.58 41.67 39.44 42.53 40.49 47.62 47.62 35.60 37.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.68 19.23 0.00 0.00 Page: 60 • expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 61 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 1206-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1206-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Information Systems 1208 General Appropriations 1208-4200 Contract Services Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 45,225.00 45,225.00 498,183.00 1208-4201 Contract Serv/Private 8,247.00 Total Contract Services 8,247.00 1208-4900 Depreciation 1208-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 12,488.00 Total Depreciation 12,488.00 1208-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 1208-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 36,760.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 36,760.00 Total General Appropriations 57,495.00 1299 Interfund Transfers Out • 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out Total Interfund Transfers Out 2101 Police 2101-4200 Contract Services 185,701.00 185,701.00 0.00 44,532.13 0.00 44,532.13 16,900.20 192,821.27 633.35 633.35 3,803.02 3,803.02 1,986.04 1,986.04 3,135.64 0.00 0.00 -1,293.17 -1,293.17 302,226.09 102.86 102.86 39.33 4,443.98 46.11 4,443.98 46.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,488.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,488.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,760.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,760.00 0.00 633.35 3,803.02 0.00 53,691.98 6.61 15,475.00 15,475.00 77,375.00 77,375.00 0.00 0.00 108,326.00 108,326.00 41.67 41.67 2101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 6,450.00 160.58 160.58 0.00 6,289.42 2.49 Total Contract Services 6,450.00 160.58 160.58 0.00 6,289.42 2.49 2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Page: 61 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 62 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 2101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 2101-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 101-4900 Depreciation 2101-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 2101-4902 DepreciationNehicles Total Depreciation 2101-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 2101-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 2101-5403 Vehicles Total Equipment/Furniture Total Police 2201 Fire 2201-4200 Contract Services 2201-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services •22014300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2201-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 2201-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2201-4900 Depreciation 2201-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 2201-4902 DepreciationNehicles Total Depreciation 2201-5400 Equipment/Fumiture Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 39,000.00 32,000.00 71,000.00 16,029.00 104,622.00 120,651.00 0.00 135,578.00 135,578.00 333,679.00 28,800.00 28,800.00 10,645.00 46,379.00 57,024.00 480.00 72,421.00 72,901.00 5,370.51 4,459.76 9,830.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,314.29 1,314.29 11,305.14 17,771.46 17,771.46 ' 404.53 -7,055.41 -6,650.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,998.46 12,000.30 31,998.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,326.17 80,823.28 82,149.45 114,308.79 6,518.45 6,518.45 3,324.95 20,855.67 24,180.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,958.49 1,958.49 19,001.54 51.28 18,041.21 43.62 37,042.75 47.83 0.00 16,029.00 0.00 0.00 104,622.00 0.00 0.00 120,651.00 0.00 0.00 51,917.81 51,917.81 53,876.30 8,929.17 8,929.17 0.00 752.00 752.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,326.17 0.00 2,836.91 97.91 1,510.74 98.89 165,493.91 50.40 13,352.38 53.64 13,352.38 53.64 7,320.05 31.23 24,771.33 46.59 32,091.38 43.72 480.00 0.00 72,421.00 0.00 72,901.00 0.00 Page: 62 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 63 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 2201-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 2201-5403 Vehicles Total Equipment/Fumiture Total Fire • 2601 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 2601-4200 Contract Services 2601-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 2601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 2601-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2601-4900 Depreciation 2601-4902 DepreciationNehicles Total Depreciation Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 6,965.00 170,335.00 177,300.00 336,025.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 2,600.00 1,560.00 4,160.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,965.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 170,335.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 177,300.00 0.00 11,120.58 30,699.07 9,681.17 295,644.76 12.02 0.00 0.00 413.34 5.82 419.16 0.00 0.00 1,077.53 -22.22 1,055.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 1,522.47 41.44 1,582.22 1.42 3,104.69 25.37 16,145.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,145.00 0.00 16,145.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,145.00 0.00 Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 23,305.00 419.16 1,055.31 0.00 22,249.69 4.53 3102 Sewers/Storm Drains • 3102-4200 Contract Services 3102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4,000.00 912.60 912.60 269.40 2,818.00 29.55 Total Contract Services 4,000.00 912.60 912.60 269.40 2,818.00 29.55 3102-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3102-4309 Maintenance Materials 3102-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 3102-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,000.00 1,800.00 2,300.00 6,100.00 6.31 80.23 64.81 151.35 6.31 293.90 57.06 357.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,993.69 0.32 1,506.10 16.33 2,242.94 2.48 5,742.73 5.86 Page: 63 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/112004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 64 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 3102-4900 Depreciation 3102-4902 DepreciationNehicles 14,279.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,279.00 0.00 111 Total Depreciation 14,279.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,279.00 0.00 Total Sewers/Storm Drains 24,379.00 1,063.95 1,269.87 269.40 22,839.73 6.31 3104 Traffic Safety/St. Maint. 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3104-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 3104-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,850.00 1,600.00 4,450.00 379.20 25.30 404.50 1,346.27 304.76 1,651.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,503.73 1,295.24 2,798.97 47.24 19.05 37.10 3104-4900 Depreciation 3104-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 229.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 229.00 0.00 3104-4902 DepreciationNehicles 15,149.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,149.00 0.00 Total Depreciation 15,378.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,378.00 0.00 Total Traffic Safety/St. Maint. 19,828.00 404.50 1,651.03 0.00 18,176.97 8.33 3302 Community Services .3302-4200 Contract Services 3302-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 3302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3302-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 3302-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3302-4900 Depreciation 3302-4902 DepreciationNehicles Total Depreciation 900.00 900.00 6,500.00 10,000.00 16,500.00 24,126.00 24,126.00 33.76 33.76 469.75 333.36 803.11 33.76 33.76 2,294.49 2,334.25 4,628.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 866.24 3.75 866.24 3.75 4,205.51 35.30 7,665.75 23.34 11,871.26 28.05 24,126.00 0.00 24,126.00 0.00 Page: 64 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status, Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 65 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 3302-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 3302-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Fumiture Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prot Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 20,763.00 20,763.00 9,011.35 9,011.35 9,011.35 9,011.35 2,545.05 2,545.05 9,206.60 55.66 9,206.60 55.66 Total Community Services 62,289.00 9,848.22 13,673.85 2,545.05 46,070.10 26.04 • 4201 Community Dev/Building 4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4201-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 4201-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4201-4900 Depreciation 4201-4902 DepreciationNehicles Total Depreciation Total Community Dev/Building 4202 Public Works Administration 4202-4200 Contract Services 4202-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services S4202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4202-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 4202-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4202-4900 Depreciation 4202-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 4202-4902 DepreciationNehicles Total Depreciation 1,200.00 800.00 2,000.00 8,023.00 8,023.00 10,023.00 15,644.00 15,644.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 2,400.00 5,423.00 7,355.00 12,778.00 153.85 84.46 238.31 0.00 0.00 614.62 1,029.09 1,643.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 585.38 51.22 -229.09 128.64 356.29 82.19 8,023.00 0.00 8,023.00 0.00 238.31 1,643.71 0.00 8,379.29 16.40 0.00 0.00 126.33 0.00 126.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 540.38 232.43 772.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 644.00 95.88 644.00 95.88 659.62 45.03 967.57 19.37 1,627.19 32.20 5,423.00. 0.00 7,355.00 0.00 12,778.00 0.00 Page: 65 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 66 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 4202-5400 Equipment/Furniture 4202-5403 Vehicles 26,250.00 411 Total Equipment/Fumiture 26,250.00 Total Public Works Administration 57,072.00 4204 Building Maintenance 4204-4200 Contract Services 4204-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4204-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 4204-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4204-4900 Depreciation 4204-4902 DepreciationNehicles Total Depreciation 04204-5600 Buildings/Improvements 4204-5602 Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs Total Buildings/Improvements Total Building Maintenance 4206 Equipment Service 4206-4100 Personal Services 4206-4102 Regular Salaries 4206-4106 Regular Overtime 4206-4111 Accrual Cash In 4206-4112 Part Time/Temporary 4,000.00 4,000.00 700.00 1,000.00 1,700.00 3,360.00 3,360.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 13,560.00 106,774.00 3,000.00 4,218.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26,250.00 0.00 126.33 772.81 15,000.00 41,299.19 27.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.82 5.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 81.71 298.92 380.63 0.00 0.00 4,545.03 4,545.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 757.75 757.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 618.29 -56.67 561.62 11.67 105.67 66.96 3,360.00 0.00 3,360.00 0.00 -45.03 101.00 -45.03 101.00 5.82 4,925.66 757.75 7,876.59 41.91 5,409.42 291.88 2,279.20 2,784.14 27,047.14 917.20 2,279.20 15,709.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79,726.86 25.33 2,082.80 30.57 1,938.80 54.04 -15,709.18 0.00 Page: 66 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 67 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 4206-4180 Retirement 4206-4188 Employee Benefits 4206-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 4206-4200 Contract Services W4206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4206-4251 Contract Services/Govt Total Contract Services 4206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4206-4309 Maintenance Materials 4206-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 4206-4311 Auto Maintenance 4206-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4206-4900 Depreciation 4206-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment Total Depreciation Total Equipment Service 4601 Community Resources .4601-4200 Contract Services 4601-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 4601-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4601-4900 Depreciation Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 12,195.00 13,731.00 604.00 140,522.00 6,520.00 500.00 7,020.00 3,500.00 1,600.00 1,000.00 14,287.00 20,387.00 773.00 773.00 168,702.00 780.00 780.00 800.00 2,500.00 3,300.00 619.12 643.25 212.98 12,239.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 507.45 0.00 246.28 1,191.00 1,944.73 0.00 0.00 14,184.72 117.59 117.59 195.73 0.00 195.73 3,095.50 3,216.23 1,201.74 53,466.19 4,454.68 492.89 4,947.57 1,031.56 0.00 307.14 5,955.00 7,293.70 0.00 0.00 65,707.46 117.59 117.59 658.87 59.89 718.76 0.00 9,099.50 25.38 0.00 10,514.77 23.42 0.00 -597.74 198.96 0.00 87,055.81 38.05 119.54 1,945.78 70.16 0.00 7.11 98.58 119.54 1,952.89 72.18 303.19 2,165.25 38.14 0.00 1,600.00 0.00 0.00 692.86 30.71 0.00 8,332.00 41.68 303.19 12,790.11 37.26 0.00 773.00 0.00 0.00 773.00 0.00 422.73 102,571.81 39.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 662.41 15.08 662.41 15.08 141.13 82.36 2,440.11 2.40 2,581.24 21.78 Page: 67 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through_ 11/30/2004 Page: 68 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Account Number 4601-4902 DepreciationNehicles Total Depreciation Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 5,577.00 5,577.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,577.00 0.00 5,577.00 0.00 0601-5400 Equipment/Furniture 4601-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 6,965.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,965.00 0.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 6,965.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,965.00 0.00 Total Community Resources 16,622.00 313.32 836.35 0.00 15,785.65 5.03 6101 Parks 6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 6101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 6101-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 6101-4900 Depreciation 6101-4902 DepreciationNehicles Total Depreciation 2,000.00 800.00 2,800.00 7,023.00 7,023.00 310.36 72.46 382.82 0.00 0.00 1,173.90 171.35 1,345.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 826.10 58.70 628.65 21.42 1,454.75 48.04 7,023.00 0.00 7,023.00 0.00 Total Parks 9,823.00 382.82 1,345.25 0.00 8,477.75 13.69 .8612 Public Works Yard Renovation 8612-4200 Contract Services 8612-4201 Contract Serv/Private 79,858.00 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 79,858.00 0.00 Total Public Works Yard Renovation 79,858.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79,858.00 0.00 Total Equipment Replacement Fund 1,901,748.00 82,421.42 511,888.45 85,688.04 1,304,171.51 31.42 Grand Total 39,613,972.00 2,468,034.12 12,482,524.52 6,519,840.84 20,611,606.64 47.97 Page: 68 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 69 Account Number 001 General Fund General Fund Total • 105 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund Total 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund Downtown Enhancement Fund Total 110 Parking Fund Parking Fund Total 115 State Gas Tax Fund State Gas Tax Fund Total 117 AB939 Fund AB939 Fund Total 119 Compensated Absences Fund Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 19,300,282.00 1,531,738.99 7,605,027.68 579,320.01 11,115,934.31 42.41 518,228.00 1,531,072.00 2,980,255.00 357,151.00 82,546.00 52,128.62 211,994.01 39,226.30 267,007.69 48.48 37,615.92 219,218.44 400,932.67 910,920.89 40.50 230,006.03 1,203,720.56 24,759.92 1,751,774.52 41.22 29,763.00 148,815.00 0.00 208,336.00 41.67 15,331.48 45,028.34 0.00 37,517.66 54.55 Page: 69 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 70 Account Number Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 0.00 37,177.00 41.67 Compensated Absences Fund 63,732.00 5,311.00 26,555.00 Total 4121 Prop A Open Space Fund Prop A Open Space Fund 242,300.00 1,713.00 8,565.00 221,743.00 11,992.00 95.05 Total 122 Tyco Fund Tyco Fund Total 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 2,481,740.00 165,000.00 85,687.65 187,038.28 1,845,037.07 449,664.65 81.88 10,000.00 10,000.00 85,238.00 69,762.00 57.72 Total 126 4% Utility Users Tax Fund • 4% Utility Users Tax Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 136 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 2,864.00 88.00 832.11 0.00 2,031.89 29.05 Total 137 Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund 8,924.00 255.00 5,421.36 0.00 3,502.64 60.75 Total Page: 70 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 71 Account Number 138 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 9,855.00 292.00 5,619.02 0.00 4,235.98 57.02 Total `139 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 0.00 0.00 401.33 0.00 -401.33 0.00 Total 140 Community Dev Block Grant Community Dev Block Grant Total 145 Proposition A Fund Proposition A Fund Total 146 Proposition C Fund Proposition C Fund 159,522.00 390,179.00 60,000.00 3,068.50 10,727.00 48,430.00 100,365.00 37.08 3,845.65 91,983.84 15,850.20 282,344.96 27.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 Total 150 Grants Fund Grants Fund 651,812.00 14,139.77 20,056.77 598,530.25 33,224.98 94.90 Total 151 Ofc of Traffic Sfty Grant Fund Ofc of Traffic Sfty Grant Fund 711,845.00 0.00 760.30 671,300.00 39,784.70 94.41 Page: 71 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 72 Account Number Total 152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund Total 153 Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) Total 154 CA Law Enf Equip Prog Fund (CLEEP) CA Law Enf Equip Prog Fund (CLEEP) 1110 Total 156 Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prey (TRAP) Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prey (TRAP) Total 160 Sewer Fund Sewer Fund Total 170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund Asset Seizure/Forft Fund Total Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 1,000.00 192,143.00 35,862.00 123,293.00 1,662,439.00 125,415.00 30.00 260.00 0.00 740.00 26.00 1,271.90 18,101.14 572.64 173,469.22 9.72 427.59 5,282.60 380.00 30,199.40 15.79 9,888.04 49,440.20 0.00 73,852.80 40.10 54,096.37 237,091.09 298,968.45 1,126,379.46 32.25 10,203.14 51,595.50 0.00 73,819.50 41.14 Page: 72 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 73 Account Number 180 Fire Protection Fund Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used Fire Protection Fund 358,932.00 17,939.52 116,787.53 32,475.46 209,669.01 41.59 Total 198 Retirement Stabilization Fund Retirement Stabilization Fund Total 199 Contingency Fund Contingency Fund Total 301 Capital Improvement Fund Capital Improvement Fund 260,000.00 32,457.00 2,710,924.00 21,667.00 108,335.00 0.00 151,665.00 41.67 2,705.00 13,525.00 0.00 18,932.00 41.67 77,088.80 125,704.56 1,065,956.27 1,519,263.17 43.96 Total 302 Artesia Blvd Relinquishment Artesia Blvd Relinquishment 509,000.00 11,422.55 11,422.55 464,767.45 32,810.00 93.55 Total 307 Myrtle Util Undrgrnd Impr Fund Myrtle UtiI Undrgmd Impr Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 309 Bayview Dr Utiltiy Undergmding Dist Bayview Dr Utiltiy Undergmding Dist 45,000.00 4,334.89 4,334.89 40,665.11 0.00 100.00 Page: 73 1 expstat.rpt 12/15/2004 1:18PM Expenditure Status Report CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/1/2004 through 11/30/2004 Page: 74 Account Number Total 310 Bonnie Brae Utility Undergrnding Dist • Bonnie Brae Utility Undergrnding Dist Total 311 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Improvmnt Fund Beach Dr Assessment Dist Improvmnt Fund Recap Report Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used 26,931.00 463,369.00 0.00 26,930.53 0.00 0.47 100.00 0.00 388,095.50 0.00 75,273.50 83.76 Total 312 Prospect Utility Undergrounding Dist Prospect Utility Undergrounding Dist 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 705 Insurance Fund Insurance Fund 1,448,152.00 153,553.29 1,011,965.94 0.00 436,186.06 69.88 110 Total 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Equipment Replacement Fund 1,901,748.00 82,421.42 511,888.45 85,688.04 1,304,171.51 31.42 Total Grand Total 39,613,972.00 2,468,034.12 12,482,524.52 6,519,840.84 20,611,606.64 31.51 Page: 74 FUND (UMBER FUND NAME GENERAL ACCOUNT • - TREASURER'S REPORT - Nov -04 11/1/2004 BALANCE • CASH ADJUSTMENT 11/30/2004 CHECKS ADJUSTMENT BALANCE 001 GENERAL 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 110 PARKING 115 STATE GAS TAX 117 AB939 119 COMPENSATED ABSENCES 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE 122 TYCO 125 PARK REC FAC TAX 126 RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY 127 BUILDING IMPROVMENT 136 LOWER PIER ADMIN EXPENSE 137 MYRTLE ADMIN EXPENSE 138 LOMA ADMIN EXPENSE 139 BEACH DR ASSMNT ADMIN EXP FUND 140 COMM DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 145 PROPOSITION A 146 PROPOSITION C 150 GRANTS 151 OFC OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DISTRICT 153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENF SERVICES 154 CA LAW ENF EQUIPMENT PROGRAM 156 TASK FORCE FOR REG AUTOTHEFT PREV 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 170 ASSET SEIZURE 180 FIRE PROTECTION 198 RETIREMENT STABILIZATION FUND 199 CONTINGENCY 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 302 ARTESIA BLVD. RELINQUISHMENT 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPROV 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDERGROUND IMPROV 308 LOMA UTIL UNDERGRND IMPROV 309 BAYVIEW DRIVE UNDERGROUND DISTRICT 310 BONNIE BRAE UNDERGROUND DISTRICT 311 BEACH DRIVE UNDERGROUND DISTRICT 312 PROSPECT UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT 610 LOWER PIER DISTRICT REDEMP 612 BEACH DR ASSMNT DIST RESERVE FUND 617 MYRTLE REDEMPTION 618 LOMA REDEMPTION 625 OTHER POST EMPL BENEFITS FUND -POLICE 705 INSURANCE 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 900 INVESTMENT TOTAL GENERAL ACCOUNT $258,851.21 $64,131.62 $855,233.61 $354,912.75 $23,263.88 $359,998.61 $922,265.06 ($27,405.71) $2,207,624.31 $223,636.31 $29,864.25 $3,915.92 ($457.93) $3,156.08 $5,596.79 ($401.33) ($63,923.20) $197,492.53 $978,178.77 ($230,626.62) ($760.30) $22,673.01 $181,982.38 $30,805.60 ($58,781.05) $1,358,879.74 $96,370.24 $296,743.28 $1,052,139.41 $2,639,821.18 $2,540,841.78 $525,920.42 $71,261.25 $4,670.23 $100,173.85 $44,244.78 $0.47 $75,272.96 $0.00 $6,038.51 $3,018.83 $26,089.79 $11,514.29 $0.00 $4,315,392.17 $2,588,816.57 $0.00 $1,280,175.07 $3,353.83 $62,829.16 $234,424.31 $30,060.43 $4,999.63 $24,153.00 $63,632.00 $43,724.24 $35,872.08 $245,438.00 $4,880.78 $1,737.50 $18,514.00 $38.19 $33.46 $238,529.32 (994,808.52) (32,995.69) (33,013.95) (88,150.78) $8,949.00 $315.72 $31,441.43 $58,333.00 $49,064.00 $128,644.00 $120,846.00 $500.00 $104,679.51 (14,508.39) (63,528.16) (10,000.00) (3,068.50) (3,163.98) (14,039.21) (30.71) (130.58) (427.59) (6,863.25) (24,346.78) (6,935.49) (4,375.91) (75,128.32) (11,422.55) (3,579.67) (166,178.13) (44,412.09) (624,017.38) (9,098.12) (1,328.43) (138,908.09) (29,763.41) (195.29) (5,311.00) (1,713.00) (23,223.31) (3.93) (0.53) $22,098,436.30 $2,054,365.68 $740,801.98 ($1,601,108.25) TRUST ACCOUNTS BALANCE 11/1/2004 BALANCE DEPOSITS CHARGES 11/30/2004 PAYROLL CABLE TV DEPOSIT TOTAL TRUST ACCOUNTS TOTAL ALL ACCOUNTS $21,794,015.27 INVESTMENTS $99,346.40 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE 74-7/771* ORKMAN, CITY TREASURER $3,000.00 $10,000.00 $13,000.00 $982,645.70 ($982,645.70) $3,000.00 $10,000.00 $982,645.70 ($982,645.70) $13,000.00 $22,378,960.14 (88.00) (255.00) (292.00) (4.78) (17.19) (0.41) (3.20) (0.54) (2,965.96) (9,189.59) (3,204.00) (12,865.22) (21,685.50) (2,751.40) (564.51) (9.24) (1.25) (0.08) (1.76) (1.32) (7,373.56) (734.49) (30,964.08) (926,535.57) $158,729.70 $25,391.64 $892,669.39 $362,593.91 $55,002.33 $350,294.56 $916,954.06 ($29,118.71) $2,120,872.84 $237,785.38 $29,863.72 $3,915.92 ($545.93) $2,901.08 $5,304.79 ($401.33) ($3,359.70) $238,048.01 $1,014,033.66 $772.17 ($760.30) $22,641.89 $181,848.60 $30,377.47 ($68,610.26) $1,388,557.15 $87,968.25 $298,016.15 $1,030,453.91 $2,637,069.78 $2,514,212.95 $514,488.63 $71,260.00 $4,670.15 $100,172.09 $40,665.11 $0.47 $75,271.64 $0.00 $6,038.51 $3,018.83 $26,127.98._ $11,547.75 $121,270.44 $4,269,325.55 $2,618,619.91 $0.00 22,365,960.14 BANK BALANCES GENERAL TRUST ACCTS OUTSTANDING CHECKS INVESTMENTS BALANCE $691,794.85 $22.451.69 $714,246.54 ($129,301.67) $584,944.87 $21.794,015.27 $22,378,960.14 2d(2) • • December 28, 2004 Honorable Mayor City Council Meeting and Members of the City Council of January 11, 2005 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. Attached is a report of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of November 2004. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, J •. Workman ity reasurer NOTED: NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Step f%f=urr-II Viki Copand Finance Finance Director City Manager 2d(3) INSTITUTION LAIF 11/1/2004 INVESTMENT REPORT Nov -04 RATE DATE OF DATE OF ORIGINAL MARKET * FACE/PAR OF % WEIGHTED BOOK VALUE INVESTMENT MATURITY COST VALUE VALUE INTEREST TOTAL YIELD $20,588,947.81 ($300,000.00) 11/3004 $20,288,947.81 U.S. GOVT AGENCY BONDS/NOTES $20,288,947.81 1.560% 93.116% 1.453% Federal Home Loan $500,906.63 11/5/2003 2/15/2006 $501,690.00 $496,405.00 $500,000.00 2.375% 2.295% 0.055% Federal Home Loan $503,996.20 4/19/2004 9/15/2006 $505,385.00 $498,125.00 $500,000.00 2.875% 2.295% 0.066% Federal Home Loan $500,164.63 7/21/2004 8/15/2006 $500,200.00 $496,875.00 $500,000.00 2.750% 2.295% 0.063% $21,794,015.27 $1,507,275.00 $1,491,405.00 $21,788,947.81 100.00% 1.636% In compliance with the Califomia Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months. Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. • RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, CITY TREASURER 1 • ‘,27) � a January 3, 20 5 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council January 11, 2005 ADOPTION OF ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2005 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the annual statement of investment policy for calendar year 2005 BACKGROUND Government Code section 53646 requires the filing of an annual Statement of Investment Policy by local public agencies. ANALYSIS With safety as a focus and the primary concern being the security of principal, the investments described will continue to earn current reasonable returns. Respectfully submitted, NOTED: j91 1 a 4. lig4 t a 'JoIoSte ' . = urrell Ci • �I • '-asurerman City Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT, FILING AND APPROVAL OF THE ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY AND DELEGATING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE CITY TREASURER FOR THE YEAR 2005 WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53646 requires the filing of an annual +Statement of Investment Policy by local public agencies; and WHEREAS, the City Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach has rendered the following Statement of Investment Policy to this City Council for the calendar year 2005: PURPOSE: This statement is intended to provide a guideline for the prudent investment of temporary idle cash, trust funds and restricted moneys and to outline a policy for maximizing the efficiency of the cash management system. Ultimate investment goals include the enhancement of economic status and the protection of pooled cash investments. OBJECTIVE: The cash management system of the City of Hermosa Beach is designed to accurately monitor and forecast expenditures and revenues, thus insuring the investment of moneys to the fullest extent possible. The city attempts to obtain highest interest yields possible as long as investments meet the criteria required for safety and liquidity. POLICY: The City of Hermosa Beach operates its investment program with State and self- imposed constraints. It does not buy stocks; it does not speculate; it does not deal in futures, options or security loan agreements. With regard to investment companies, the City will deal only with investment companies registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The City Treasurer will have sole discretion over Security Trading, except in the case of monies invested in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund(LAIF) and the Los Angeles County Pooled Investment fund(LACPIF). Longer term investments (over one year) are generally limited to maturates of 3 years or less, but will never exceed five years. 1 F:\B95\FINANCEI\RES005.DOC 1 Criteria for selecting investments and the absolute order of priority are: 2 1. Safety: The safety and risk associated with an investment refers to the potential loss of principal, 3 interest or a combination of these amounts. Since it is the primary duty and responsibility of the 4 Treasurer to protect, preserve and maintain cash and investments placed in his/her trust on behalf of 5 the citizens of the City, Hermosa Beach only invests in those instruments that are considered very safe. 6 2. Liquidity: This refers to the ability to "cash in" at any moment in time with minimal chance of 7 losing some portion of the principal or interest. An adequate percentage of the portfolio should be 8 maintained in liquid short-term investments which can be converted to cash if necessary to meet 9 disbursement requirements. Since all cash requirements cannot be anticipated, investments in 10 securities with active secondary or resale markets is highly recommended. Emphasis should be on 11 marketable securities with low sensitivity to market risk. 12 3. Yield: yield is the potential dollar earnings an investment can provide, and sometimes is described 13 as the rate of return. It should become a consideration only after the basic requirements of safety and 14 liquidity have been met. 15 The City's investment philosophy is to insure the safety of principle and to provide money when 16 needed. A high dollar yield on investments, though important, ranks third in the priority of investment 17 strategy. 18 Depository Services 19 Money must be deposited in state or national banks, state or federal savings associations, or 20 state or federal credit unions in the state. It may be in inactive deposits, active deposits or interest- 21 bearing active deposits which are insured or collateralized as required by Government Code Section 22 53630 at seq. The deposits generally may not exceed the amount of the bank's shareholders' equity, 23 the savings and loan's networth or the credit union's unimpaired capital and surplus. We require that 24 each financial institution submit current financial statements which are evaluated prior to the 25 investment of funds. We use the following criteria: 26 The institution must have been in business at least three years. The institution must submit audited 27 financial statements. In addition, examination is made of the Reserve for Loan Losses category to 28 evaluate the financial trend of the institution's asset base. Whenever possible, the use of several year 2 F:\695\FINANCE1 \RES005.DOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 financial data is evaluated to present a trend of activity in the institution. We also require the interest be paid to the City on a monthly basis (current state law only requires quarterly payment). Authorized Investments Generally, investments shall be made in the context of the "prudent person" rule, which states that, "investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." The City is further governed by the California Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq. Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein: Negotiable Certificates of Deposit. No more than 5% of the City's portfolio is invested in any one institution. Time Certificates of Deposits are safekept in a legally acceptable safekeeping account. Total purchases are not to exceed 30% of surplus funds. An institution must meet the following criteria to be considered by the City: 1. The institution must be located in California. 2. The institution must have current financial information, signed contract and waiver on file with the City. 3. The institution must maintain a net worth to asset ratio of a least 5%, and have a positive earnings record. 4. The institution must be at least 3 years old. U. S. TREASURIES are direct obligations of the United States Government. U.S. TREASURY BILLS are issued weekly with maturity dates up to one year. They are issued and traded on a discount basis and the interest is figured on the 360 day basis, actual number of days. They are issued in amounts of $10,000 and up, in multiples of $5,000. They are a highly liquid security. U.S. TREASURY NOTES are initially issued with two to ten years maturities. They are actively traded in a large secondary market and are very liquid. 3 F:1B95\FINA NCEI\RES005.DOC 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MEDIUM-TERM NOTES (MTNs) are corporate notes. Issuers include well recognized banks and bank holding companies, insurance companies, finance companies and industrial corporations. A large percentage of MTNs are unsecured senior debt obligations, although a number of recent issues have come to market on a collateralized or secured basis. Maturity bonds are from 9 months to one year, one year to 18 months, 18 months to 2 years, and annually thereafter. Typically, rates are established at a positive spread over a Treasury security of comparable maturity. Credit ratings on MTNs are established by nationally recognized rating - services. Standard and Poor's, Moody's Investors Service and Fitch Investors Service. Credit supported MTNs typically carry the Aaa/AAA long term rating, based on the credit -worthiness of the support entity. Collateralized MTNs receive the same rating based on the over collateralization limits set by Standard and Poor's and Moody's. Although a rating of A is required for Municipal investment as per sections 53601 and/or 53635, this agency, as policy, will only consider investments with Aa/aa or better. There can be only 30% of the total surplus funds used for MTN investment as per section 53635. MTNs offer safety, yield and liquidity through a strong secondary market. BANKER'S ACCEPTANCES are negotiable time drafts drawn to finance the export, import, shipment or storage of goods, and they are termed "Accepted" when a bank guarantees to pay the face value at maturity. A Banker's Acceptance constitutes an irrevocable obligation of the accepting bank and a contingent obligation of the drawer and of any endorsees whose names appear upon it. The bank is protected by its customer's agreement to provide the necessary funds in advance of the maturity of the Acceptance and also by the pledge of documents such as bills of lading, independent warehouse of terminal receipts, and other documents evidencing ownership and the insurance of the goods so financed. Cities and other local agencies are authorized to purchase Banker's Acceptances, subject to several restrictions. First, the Banker's Acceptance must be eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System. Second, purchases of Banker's Acceptances must not exceed one hundred eighty (180) days maturity or 40% of the City's surplus money invested under Sections 53601 and/or 53635. Finally, no more than 5% of the agency's surplus funds may be invested in the Banker's Acceptances of any one commercial bank . 4 F:\B95\FINANCEI \RESO05.DOC • • 1 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) is a pooled investment fund in the State 2 Treasury which local agencies may use to deposit funds for investment. There is no minimum 3 investment period and the minimum transaction is $5,000, in multiples of $1,000 above that, with a 4 maximum of $40,000,000 for any agency. The City is restricted to a maximum of fifteen (15) 5 transactions per month. It offers high liquidity because deposits can be converted to cash in twenty - 6 four hours and no interest is lost. All interest is distributed to those agencies participating on a 7 proportionate share determined by the amounts deposited and the length of time they are deposited. 8 Interest is paid quarterly via direct deposit. The State keeps an amount for reasonable costs of making 9 the investments, not to exceed one-quarter of one percent of the earnings. The interest rates are fairly 10 high because of the pooling of the State surplus cash with the surplus cash deposited by local 11 governments. This creates a multi -billion dollar money pool and allows diversified investments. In a 12 high interest rate market, we do better than LAIF, but in times of low interest rates, LAIF yields are 13 higher. The City continually invests in the Local Agency Investment Fund (Government Code Section 14 16429). 15 LOS ANGELES COUNTY POOLED INVESTMENT FUND (LACPIF) Pursuant to Government 16 Code Section 53684, local agencies in the County of Los Angeles may deposit excess funds in 17 LACPIF for the purpose of investment by the county treasurer Government Code Sections 53601 and 18 53635; 19 The County keeps an amount for reasonable costs of making the investments, not to exceed sixteen 20 (16) basis points per month. The number of monthly transactions are not restricted. 21 Safekeeping 22 Certificates of Deposit or Receipts of Public Funds must be mailed or delivered to the City. Banker's 23 acceptances are actual "physical" securities, meaning they are evidenced by actual certificates. All 24 Treasury bills and most other Treasury securities are "book entry" securities, meaning they are held at 25 the Federal Reserve Union Bank of California where only a book entry is used to denote ownership. 26 Collateral for time deposits in banks and savings and loans are held by the Federal Home Loan Bank 27 (FHB) or an approved Agency of Depository of the financial institution. 28 Securities purchased from broker/dealers shall be held in third party safekeeping. 5 F:\B95\FINANCE1\RESO05.DOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Public Trust All participants in the investment process shall act as custodians of the public trust. Investment officials shall recognize that the investment portfolio is subject to public review and evaluation. The overall program shall be designed and managed with a degree of professionalism that is worthy of the public trust. In a diversified portfolio it must be recognized that occasional measurement losses are inevitable, and must be considered within the context of the overall portfolio's investment return, provided that adequate diversification has been implemented. Risk Tolerance The City Council recognizes that investment risks can result from issuer defaults, market price changes or various technical complications leading to temporary illiquidity. Portfolio diversification is employed as a way to control risk. Investment Managers are expected to display prudence in the selection of securities, as a way to minimize default risk. No individual investment transaction shall be undertaken which jeopardizes the .total capital position of the overall portfolio. The Treasurer shall periodically establish guidelines and strategies to control risks of default, market price changes, and illiquidity. Reporting The Treasurer or his deputy shall submit a monthly investment report to the City Council. This report will include all required elements of the monthly report as prescribed by Government Code Section 53646. Under the City's current Investment Policy, of the monthly report shall include: a. Type of investment b. Name of issuer c. Date of investment d. Date of maturity e. Amount of deposit or cost of the security f. Current market value g. Rate of Interest h. A statement of compliance with California Code Section 53646, from the City 6 F:\B95\FINANCE1\RES005.DOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • • Treasurer certifying that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirement for the next six months; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach, as set forth in the recitals hereof, filed by the City Treasurer in compliance with Section 53646 (a) of the Government Code, is hereby approved. Section 2. That this policy applies to investments effective January 1, 2005. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11th DAY OF January 2005 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 7 F:\B95\F INANCE1 \RESO05.DOC • • Ac/je--&-- PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2004 CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1315 VALLEY DRIVE 7:00 P.M. MINUTES The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. 1. Roll Call Present: Commissioners Beste, DiVirgilio, Marinelli, Winnek Also Present: Richard Morgan, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Tristan Malabanan, Associate Engineer Rhea Punneo Administrative Assistant, Public Works Department 2. Flaq Salute Commissioner Beste led the flag salute. 3. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the meeting of November 17, 2004 were approved as written. 4. Public Comment At this time Commissioner Lombardo announced that the Beach Cities Toy Drive would be wrapping toys at the Jocelyn Center in Manhattan Beach on Saturday, December 18th at 11:00 a.m. All are invited to help wrap gifts. 5. Correspondence None at this time. 6. Items for Commission Consideration a. Project No. CIP 04-115 Street Improvements — 20th Street from Valley Drive to Power Street, Plan Review Tristan Malabanan, PW Associate Engineer, presented this item. He went over the main scope of the project, which includes fully reconstructing some areas, recompacting the soil and adding a center swale. 2f • • Highlights of public commentary included: • Construction would most likely begin in late March and go on for two to three months. • It will be done in phases; at most, driveway access will be unavailable for two weeks. • It will be combined with some needed sewer work. • It would be wiser to underground utilities after this work is completed. • Contractor's personnel will assist with residents' trash removal during construction. • The .5% slope is sufficient to remove water in the concrete swale. Swale will start at 581 20th St., west of manhole. • Dry weather flow will be alleviated. • The amount of sewer work will determine how long residents will be inconvenienced. • Occasionally, the County flushes out their systems, which causes water to flow down this street. Once project is completed, the "lake" at the bottom of the street will not occur. All will go down to Power. • Emergency vehicles will be able to respond to calls — have parked at either end of a street during previous projects. • The narrowness of the street precludes doing one side of the street ata time. • The project is in the preliminary design phase and more details will be available in January. Highlights of Commissioner commentary included: • The engineers would be reviewing the possibility of putting down base material beneath the asphalt paving. • Many parking problems can be eased or waived for the duration of the project. • Adding base could be an option as base could be drivable. No action was necessary and the Chairman thanked Mr. Malabanan for the presentation. b. Loma Drive Parking Enforcement Mr. Morgan presented the item, noting the unique parking opportunities long-term residency has allowed. Mr. Morgan noted that Police Department representatives were present and would be available for questions. He advised that many calls have been received voicing concerns about perpendicular parking blocking street access. The developing question was: how could Public Works help the Police Department enforce parking restrictions in a uniform manner? This proposal would allow residents to continue parking up to the red line on private property. The red line would be in alignment with the existing T's and L's, which are already painted on the street for public parking. What's being proposed is that the red line would be painted everywhere there are no T's and L's. If the Public Works Commission supports the proposal, it would be taken to Council for final approval. PWC Meeting Minutes 2 12/5/04 • • Mr. Morgan introduced Lt. Lance Jaakola of the Police Department. Lt. Jaakola advised that one of the problems officers have on Loma Dr. is determining what is or isn't a clear parking violation. One very good thing about this proposal is that everyone knows what a red line means. Public commentary highlighted the following: • The red line would be a boundary indicating parking limitations. • Many residents are in favor of the clear indication of where and where not to park. • As a general rule, T's and L's line up 7' from the curb. • To legally park perpendicular to the line, wheels have to be inside the red line. • The T's and L's are only where public parking is allowed. • The T's and L's would only be added with new developments. • The red line wouldn't be put in place unless supported by the commissioners and then forwarded to the City Council for final approval. • Consistency of enforcement is important. • Public parking would only be permitted in T's and L's. • Earliest in effect would be in January, after the first Council meeting of the month. • Some locations will have to looked at closely, Mr. Morgan will investigate • Some residents may have difficulty with parking • When there is a curb, there'd be public parking. Discussion among the commissioners highlighted the following: • Necessary to get continuous walk area; currently cars are being parked across sidewalks • Enforcement is challenging at best • Tickets would be written if there is a clear hazard regardless of position • Should be clear to all that if wheels are on the red line or over is inviting a citation • There are concerns about treating all vehicles equally • Call is more subjective when vehicle hanging into the street • Red line would be a limit line, cars should not extend farther than a parked car • Is of primary importance to have parity between Parking Enforcement and residents to make sound decisions • The red line is a good attempt to make something work in this area • Parking across sidewalks is a citable offense MOTION by Commissioner Lombardo to support staffs recommended proposal to stripe a red parking limit line on the west side of Loma Drive (south of Pier Avenue) seven feet east of the edge of the roadway. Commission Marinelli seconded the motion. AYES: Lombardi, Marinelli, DiVirgilio NAYS: Beste, Winnek ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None This item will now be forwarded to Council for approval. PWC Meeting Minutes 3 12/5/04 • • c. Additional parking on south side of Pier Avenue between Sunset Dr. and Loma Dr. Mr. Morgan presented the item noting that it included replacing the red curb in front of the former White & Day Mortuary on the south side of Pier Avenue east of Sunset Drive with one metered parking space and one 15 -minute green parking space. Discussion of the item among the commissioners included the following: • Could another green parking spot be installed? • No - had previously put a green parking space on Sunset but it was removed — can't put a commercially used spot on a residential street MOTION by Commissioner Marinelli to support staffs recommendation to replace the red curb in front of the former White & Day Mortuary on the south side of Pier Avenue east of Sunset Drive with one metered parking space and one 15 -minute green parking space. Commissioner DiVirgilio seconded the motion. AYES: Lombardi, Marinelli, DiVirgilio NAYS: Beste, Winnek ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 7. Commissioners' Reports No reports. 8. Public Works Department Reports Mr. Morgan noted that 50 yards of concrete had been poured for the Pier renovation. 9. Items Requested by Commissioners No reports. 10. Other Matters No announcements 11. Public Comment: Anyone wishing to address the Commission on other items pertaining to Public Works may do so at this time. There were no public comments at this time. 12. Adjournment Commissioner Beste adjourned the meeting at 8:32 to the meeting of January 19, 2005. PWC Meeting Minutes 4 12/5/04 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Public Works Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of December 15, 2004. Robert Beste, Chairman Richard D. Morgan, P.E., Secretary Date PWC Meeting Minutes 5 12/5/04 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council PROJECT STATUS REPORT Recommendation: It is recommended that Council receive and file this report. Summary: December 30, 2004 Regular Meeting of January 11, 2004 As of November 30, 2004 This report gives the status of capital improvement projects that are either under design or construction. Capital improvement projects not indicated in this report can be found in the department's Monthly Activity Report. Project Status: PROJECT NO. CIP 02-106 BEACH DRIVE POST-UNDERGROUNDING STREET IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS TBD PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 12/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 01/05 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 02/05 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 03/05 BID OPENING 04/05 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 05/05 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 06/05 END CONSTRUCTION 08/05 PROJECT NO. CIP 02-108 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 2'a ST. FROM PCH TO THE STRAND: MONTEREY FROM HERONDO TO 471 ST. DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS TBD PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING TBD PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 05/07/03 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 08/10/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW COMPLETED 10/20/04 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 10/26/04 BID OPENING COMPLETED 12/02/04 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 12/14/04 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 01/05 END CONSTRUCTION 03/05 PROJECT NO. CIP 04-112 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - SLURRY SEAL AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS TBD PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING TBD DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE BID OPENING TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. CIP 04-113 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - CONCRETE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS DESCRIPTION STATUS TBD PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE • BID OPENING TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION • END CONSTRUCTION 2g PROJECT NO. CIP 04-115 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 20T" ST. FROM VALLEY DR. TO POWER ST. DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 8-16-04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 12/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 12/04 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 01/05 BID OPENING 02/05 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 03/05 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 03/05 END CONSTRUCTION 05/05 PROJECT NO. CIP 04-116 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PIER AVE., HERMOSA AVE. TO PCH DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 01/05 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 03/05 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 05/05 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 04-117 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - MANHATTAN AVE. 1 ST ST. TO CITY LIMITS DESCRIPTION STATUS REVISED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 10/26/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 03/05 02/24/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 04/05 t TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TBD 10/22/03 BID OPENING TBD 06/12/03 WILL BE REBID TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 00-140 11Th PLACE ON -STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS REVISED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 12/22/02 UNDERGROUNDING DESIGN BY SCE COMPLETED 02/24/04 PLANS SPECS & ESTIMATES COMPLETED 06-15-04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW COMPLETED 10/22/03 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE (UNDERGROUNDING) ON HOLD 06/12/03 WILL BE REBID TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE (STREET IMPROVEMENTS) TBD BID OPENING TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. CIP 99409* MANHOLE REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION STATUS REVISED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING N/A DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) N/A TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE N/A BID OPENING COMPLETED 06/12/03 WILL BE REBID TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD 2 PROJECT NO. CIF, 00-412 SEWER REHAB/RECON TARGET AREA 2 DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS ON HOLD 9/14/04 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 09/04 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 07-15-03 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TBD COM 11/4/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 03/05 BID OPENING N/A TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD BID OPENING 12/04 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 03-418 UPGRADE OF SEWER PUMP STATIONS DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS ON HOLD 9/14/04 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 09/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 10/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TBD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COM 11/4/04 BID OPENING N/A TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD N/A BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 03/05 END CONSTRUCTION N/A PROJECT NO. CIP 04-534 PARK IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS BOWLING GREEN E. RODAWAY PARK FORT LOTS OF FUN PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COM 10/7/04 TBD TBD DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COM 11/4/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A N/A 03/05 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE N/A TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD BID OPENING 12/04 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD POSTPONED TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION - TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 02-612 PUBLIC WORKS YARD RENOVATION DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 9/30/04 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 7/01/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 11/01/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE N/A 03/05 BID OPENING 12/23/04 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBD END CONSTRUCTION TBD PROJECT NO. CIP 02-626 COMMUNITY CENTER THEATER ADA UPGRADES PHASES 3 & 4 DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 9/30/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 12/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF DESIGN & SPECS 01/05 BID OPENING 02/05 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 02/05 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 03/05 END CONSTRUCTION 06/05 3 PROJECT NO. CIP 00-630 PIER RENOVATION, PHASE III DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REVISED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03/08/00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 08/29/03 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 05/27/03 BID OPENING COMPLETED 07/01/04 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 07/27/04 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 09/13/04 END CONSTRUCTION 08/05 01/31/05 PROJECT NO. CIP 02-633 CITY BUILDINGS - RE -ROOFING CLARK BUILDING AND SOUTH SCHOOL DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING TBD PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 11/04/04 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 11/18/04 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE N/A BID OPENING COMPLETED 12/09/04 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 12/14/04 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 01/18/05 END CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE 01/31/05 PROJECT NO. CIP 02-634 CITY BUILDINGS - EXTERIOR PAINTING DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING TBD DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE BID OPENING TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION • Indicates Construction Completed *TBD — TO BE DETERMINED Respectfully submitted, Richard D o . rgan, P. . Director • Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Steph=u re City ager 4 A H:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\progress reports november 04-05.doc • Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council • /////6,E December 30, 2004 For the City Council Meeting of January 11, 2005 ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council accept donations received by the City to be used as follows: Mer -Maid Restaurant — Q. L. Thelen Ro-Al, Incorporated — Patrick Molloy's Howard Rumsey Jeri Coates Alphonso & Mary Ocampo Bruce & Kathleen Eddy Beach Cities EntertainmentNivian Nicholas & Rosemarie Penque Christina Scholten/Johnny Clayton, Jr. Joseph & Lynn Callinan 1 $50.00 To be used for the New Year's celebration. $250.00 To be used for the New Year's celebration. $200.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) $25.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) $25.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) $40.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) $40.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) $40.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) $50.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) $100.00 To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) c: \donation 2000.doc Zr, • Willis & Kay Aiken Willis & Kay Aiken J.E. & Flora Walker David M. Sherr Betty Hoover Donald & Margaret Queitzsch The Pepys Trust, Mark Pepys, Trustee Richard H. Meine — Builder Paul Salata — G.A. S. Investment Account Darlene Chan, Festival Productions Hennessey's Tavern, Incorporated Beach Market, Incorporated 2 $100.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $100.00 $1,000.00 $600.00 • To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) To be used for Jazz Memorial Plaques. (Recorded in Jazz Memorial account.) To be used for the D.A.R.E. program. c: \donation 2000.doc Respectfully submitted: thitte..) (ikiakt..J Valerie Mohler Accounting Supervisor Concur: Viki Copeland Finance Director API . ►,fll� .. St / hen Burre City Manager c: \donation 2000.doc • /fr/O_S January 5, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 11, 2005 PROJECT NO. CIP 02-612 PUBLIC WORKS YARD RENOVATION OIL WELL ABANDONMENT - REJECT ALL BIDS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Reject the single bid received for Project No. CIP 02-612 Public Works Yard Renovation, Phase I -. Oil Well Abandonment; 2. Waive the requirement for Labor & Material, Performance, and Bidder's Bonds; and 3. Authorize Staff to re -advertise for bids and invite the previous participating bidder to re -bid. Summary The decision to reject all bids is based on the fact that only one responsive bid was received and it was approximately 150% above the engineer's estimate. The project was advertised in a local newspaper and The Green Sheet (McGraw-Hill Construction Publishing Co.) and the Notice Inviting Bids was faxed to ten prospective bidders. BIDDER BID AMOUNT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE MMI Services, Inc. $140,412 $55,000 Staff contacted bidders who didn't submit bids for this project and was told that Performance Bonds and Labor & Material Bonds are not usual or customary in this field. These firms are paid upon completion of a project and they provide a release from labor, equipment and material suppliers at that time. Therefore, Staff recommends that the existing requirement for these bonds be waived by Council in this instance and allow that the contractor be paid upon completion of the project to the satisfaction of the City. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. Respectfully submitted, H /fiehGy " Homayoun ehboodi Associate Engineer Concur: Richard .. organ, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Stephe City M- ger ell H:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\00-630 Reject all bids REVIS 2i 1/4a//7if----C.-4- • / January 3,/2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council January 11, 2005 RECOMMENDATION TO DENY CLAIM Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council deny the following claim and refer it to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: 1. Claimant: Hauser, Julius State Farm Insurance Date of Loss: 10-15-04 Date Filed: 12-02-04 Allegation: Vehicle damaged by police car A copy of this claim is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, Concur: Michael A. Earl, Director a phen R. Burrell City Manager Personnel & Risk Management 2j CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPERTY FILE WITH: City Clerk's Office City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 INSTRUCTIONS 1. Claims for death, injury_to person or to personal property must be filed rot iater than six months after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 3. Read'entire claim form before filing. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom. 6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. Name of Claimant Julius Hauser Home Address Of Claimant 2094 Manhattan Ave . , Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Business Address of Claimant Give address and telephone number to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim. Same as above Date of Damage/Loss/Injury In front of 1212 Montero 10/15/04 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Place of Damage/Loss/Injury As line above specific) How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be See attach filed with the Manhattan Beach Police Police scene? Yes ►a No ■ Were at Yes ■ No I. Were Paramedics at scene? What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/ See attached 4 page statement. Oer fficer RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP DEPT. NO. Date Of Birti 9U -C ai 10/03/1919 Occupation of Claimant Retired CA CPA Home Telephone Number ((319) 3740504 Business Telephone Number ( ) --- Claimant's Social Security No. 545-24-9762 y Blvd A.M. Time About 2 P.M. d. 4 page Victim/wi tnPGG Gt atPm® epartment. Also see 14 photograph taken by icer,..Ic e Report No. DR# 04-O1996T injury. Lobie's violation of ction 22517 3r1i Sof City em loyee ) causing the damage/loss/injury: Ur CLanie $100.00 deductible - State Farm policy #577 -2484 -C05 -75K The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this claim, is computed as follows: (please attach estimates/receipts) PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN CLAIM FORM claimfrm.doc nt s nlau Damages incurred to date (exact): Estimated expenses for medical and hospital care Expenses for medical Future expenses for medical andN/k and hospital care $ hospital care _ Loss of earnings $ Future Toss of earnings $ Special damages for $ Other prospective special $ damages General damages $ 100.00. Prospective general damages $ Total damages incurred to date Total estimate prospective $ 1 fl n no damages WITNESSES to DAMAGE or INJURY: LIST ALL PERSONS and addresses of persons known to have information: Name See page 7 of 7 Address Phone Manhattan Beach P.D. Traffic Cn11i ca Report -gid 10/16/04, file Name Address Phone Name DR # 04-03956T Address Phone DOCTORS and HOSPITALS: None — no injuries Hospital Address Doctor Doctor Address Address Date Hospitalized Date of Treatment Date of Treatment READ CAREFULLY when you first saw City vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A-1" and location of yourself or your vehicle at the time of the accident by "B-1" and the point of impact by "X". NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant. For all accident claims place on following diagram names of streets, including North, East, South, and West; indicate place of accident by "X" and showing house number or distances to street corners. If City vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City vehicle when you first saw it, and by 'B" location of yourself or your vehicle SIDEWALK CURB -f See diagram, Manhattan Beach P.D., of Traffic_G91 \ page 2 of 7 CURB @port datPcl 1n/16/0d PARKWAY \` SIDEWALK Signature of claimant or person filing on his behalf giving relationship to Claimant: Typed Name: Julius Hauser Date: 12/02/04 PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN CLAIM FORM claimfrm.doc " 1111 75-A885-689 IU CITY OFHERMOSA BEACH CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPERTY FILE WITH: City Clerk's Office City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive • Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 INSTRUCTIONS 1. Claims for death, injury to person or to personal property must be filed not later than sbc Months after the•accurrenco. • (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 3. Read entire claim form before filing. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom. 6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. Name of Claimant - . /7� T I M �5 r .5 0 �J , 1 Is. S C, ✓5 Pi Ho e A dress O laeman F j vr's 51 A -t GIPS (A -3341t) 99.1 3 Business Address of Claimant 1 RESERVE FOR FILING.STAMP Date Of Birth Of Claimant Occupation of Claimant Give address and telephone number to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim. tet , CAt -c1.35e11,) - 619.13 Home Telephone Number ( ) Business Telephone Number (3 O) 561- 5?A3 Claimant's Social Security No. Date of Damage/Lossllnjury Oen 4 Place of Damage/Loss/Injury -‘.eXc,N b\V c� Pyr r(\49 C-4 kr,--1‘) 2,-R{ ♦ How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) 4-0V/KO-A\ s cO1 X(o 1 v -1•A Av.-• Time A.M. �'.o3 P.M. Were Police at scene? Were Paramedics at scene? Yes Er Yes 0 No ❑ No ❑ 1 1t 1� \�Fi7r Report No. c:244-258 r5� T n- 'cst,,( lob, cV. e_ u� �l d2.�,-v �o What particular act or omission do you claim caUsed the damage/loss/inju �� Gv`. X502 V �t.(� cv� b`G �.\AANn.\n ♦ "Cc Same of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: I 0 1 `ti -v • L c:Ant-t e. - kr\.-e-lcwcps e - The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this claim, is computed as follows: (please attach estimates/receipts) PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN CLAIM FORM claimfrm.doc • Damages incurred to date (exact): Expenses for medical and hospital care Loss of earnings Special damages for General damages Total damages Incurred to date -7-A5Ss Estimated expenses for medical and hospital care Future expenses for medical and hospital care Future loss of eamings Other prospective special damages Prospective r • - al damages S Total e ate prospective d- -ges $ WITNESSES to DAMAGE or INJURY: LIST ALL PERSONS and addresses of persons known to have information: Name Address Phone Name Name Address Address Phone Phone DOCTORS and HOSPITALS: Hospital Doctor Doctor Address Address Address Date Hospitalized Date of Treatment Date of Treatment RE For all accident claims place on following diagram names of streets, including North, East, South, and West; indicate place of accident by 'X' and showing house number or distances to street comers. N City vehicle was involved, designate by letter 'A' location of City vehicle when you first saw it, and by'B' location of yourself or your vehicle AD CAREFULLY when you first saw City vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A-1' and location of yourself or your vehicle at the time of the accident by "8-1" and the point of impact by X. NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant. culls :} SIDEWALK PARKWAY SIDEWALK Signature of claimant or person filing on his behalf • giving relationshito Claimant: //,� Typed Name: J CURB F ctivIS 1"..)ENTRilt !;irlli PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN CLAIM FORM ciaimtrm.doc • • State Farm Insurance Companies November 22, 2004 Julius Hauser Charlotte S Hauser 2094 Manhattan Ave Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-2862 RE: Insured: Claim Number: Date of Loss: Dear Mr. & Ms. Hauser: Julius Hauser 75-A885-689 October 15, 2004 Culver City Auto Claims Operation P.O. Box 22257 Bakersfield, CA 93390-9973 Enclosed is a claim form from the City of Hermosa Beach. Please complete and return to the City Clerk's Office for your deductible and any additional out of pocket expenses you have incurred as a result of this loss. Sincerely, Fa D. Woo Claim Representative (310) 568-5243 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company HOME OFFICES: BLOOMINGTON, ILLINOIS 61710-0001 Filed w Manhattan Beach Poli D 3rtment. VICTIM/WITNESS STATEMENT DR# 04-03956T NAME Julius Hauser ADDRESS2094 Manhattan Ave. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-2862 PHONE(310) 374-0506USINESS C31 n) 374-0504 DRIV LIC Y0001532 DOB 10/03/1919 INVOLVED PARTY ® (# 1 ) WITNESS ONLY 0 INCIDENT LOCATION Front of eX1212 Monterey Blvd., Hermosa Beach, CA INCIDENT DATE 10/15/04 STATEMENT DATE 11/18/04 STATEMENT LOCATION-STADSCENEDOTHER X PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY DIAGRAM FOR TRAFFIC ACCIDENT ON BACK SEE STATEMENT ATTACHED 4 PAGES STATEMENT RECEIVED BY SER N DATE • TRAFFIC ACCIDENT STATEMENTS ONLY I AGREE. WITH DIAGRAM SHOWN ON PAGE 2 TRAFFIC .COLLISION REPORT DATED 10/15/.04, MANHATTAN BEACH LOCAL REPORT NO. 04-03956T PREPARED BY OFFICER C ENCHENLAUB, BADGE NO. 283. DIAGRAM I CERTIFY THAT THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. DATE 11/18/04 _-. INDICATE NORTH odi 1117IGS Pflf,9 sm I, Julius Hauser, am a retired c t certified public accountant, andac :n a resident of the City of Hermosa Beach for about 35 years. I am thoroughly familiar with the speed limits and ariving conditions one encounters in our city, particularly driving on the narrow streets throughout the area, which requires extreme caution. I have never been stopped or cited for a traffic infraction by a Hermosa Beach police officer. Furthermore, during 69 years of driving experience, I have never sideswiped or hit the side of a vehicle while passing. On Friday afternoon, October 22, 2004, I picked up from Sgt. Bryan Klatt at the Manhattan Beach Police Department, the Traffic Collision Report, and copies of the 14 photographs taken by Manhattan Beach officer C. Eichenlaub at the scene of the accident. After the review of the report and photographs, I found that certain facts related to the accident were incorrect and/or omitted from the report. I have returned to the scene of the accident several times and have reconstructed the details of this unfortunate encounter. I was driving my Lincoln, with my wife in the passenger seat, north on Monterey Boulevard in the City of Hermosa Beach at approximately 2 p.m. on Friday, October 15. The posted residential speed limit was 25 mph and the driving conditions were ideal. As I approached 11th street, there was a Consolidated Disposal truck parked on the right side of the street. I recall this vividly because my wife remarked to me about the truck ahead. I reduced my speed and carefully passed the truck well below the speed limit. Continuing down Monterey, just past 11th street, I observed a police car, emergency lights flashing, parked at an angle to the curb, on the right side of the street. Due to the angle of the police car, the rear end was sticking out into the driving lane. I cautiously started to pass the left side of the police car. The door to the police car was closed. If the door had been open, I would have immediately turned any steering wheel to the left and would have avoided an accident. When traveling on the narrow streets of Hermosa Beach, I am constantly on the alert for a driver opening his door as I am approaching the rear of the vehicle. While making my pass, and after the line -of -sight to my right through the windshield and front passenger door window had already passed the area of impact on my Linclon, I felt a crunch. At that instant, I had no idea what caused the disturbance. Immediately, not slamming on my brakes, but rather gradually applying the brakes, I pulled over to the right side of the road and stopped approximately 111 feet from the area of impact. At that point, the front of the Lincoln, as shown in picture #5, was approximately 103 feet from the south curb of Pier Ave. (AOI, area -of impact, to Pier Ave., 214 feet as stated in .._ the police report minus 111 feet, AOI to the point were Lincoln stopped.)• I remained in my automobile until officer Loboe, the driver of the police car, approached and requested to see my driver's license and vehicle registration. He returned to his police car and I had no further conversation with him until I later walked down to where he was standing near his vehicle. I respectfully asked him if he had looked in his side view mirror prior to opening his door. His only response to me was, "it was an accident." (In my reconstruction, a couple of days after the accident, I parked my Lincoln at the same angle as officer Loboe's police car, as shown in pictures # 3 and #4 taken at the scene by officer Eichenlaub. I looked in my side view mirror, and just as officer Loboe stated, as described in the accident report, did not see anyone. At the angle to the curb that the police car was parked, you could only see to the rear about 30 feet. Any distance beyond that was cut off, obscured by the rear of the car.) It is unfortunate that officer Loboe did not park his vehicle more parallel to the curb. Had he done so, he would have been able to see my automobile approaching to his left in his rear view mirror, avoiding opening his door into my car. I talked to other Hermosa Beach police officers who gathered at the scene, and it was acknowledged that there was a vehicle code which covered this identical type of accident; namely, code section 22517, stating as follows: "No person shall open the door of a vehicle on the side available to moving traffic unless it is reasonably safe to do so and can be done without interfering with the movement of such traffic, nor shall any person leave a door open upon 1 • • the side of a vehicle available to moving traffic for a period of time longer than is necessary to load or unload passengers." No mention of this code section was made in the Traffic Collision Report. Regarding the approximate speed the Lincoln was traveling at the point of impact, the police report states that the police concluded that the Lincoln was traveling somewhere between 30-35 miles per hour. Reference is made to the 2004 Driving In California booklet published by the Automobile Club of Southern California, page 52, paragraph entitled Stopping Distance: "Stopping Distance If something is in your path, you need to see it in time to be able to stop. Estimates for stopping distances vary. The DMV indicates, assuming you are alert and that you have good tires, good brakes, and dry payment that, . at 55 mph it takes 400 feet to react to something you see and to bring the car to a complete stop. . at 35 mph it will take 210 feet to react and to bring the car to a a complete stop. According to the DMV, if you can't see at least 400 feet ahead, it means you can't drive safely at 55 mph. if you can't see at least 210 feet ahead, you can't drive safely at 35 mph. By the time you see an object in your path, it would be too late to stop without hitting it. Conditions are rarely ideal, so allow yourself extra space." The Traffic Collision Report, page 5, under the caption AOI , states the area of impact was 214 feet south of the south curb line prolongation of Pier Ave., by 11 feet west of the east curb line of Monterey Blvd. According to the DMV analysis, quoted above, if the Lincoln was traveling at 35 mph, it would take 210 feet to bring the car to complete stop. Based on the actual facts, a conclusion could be made that inasmuch as the AOI was. 214 feet from the south curb of Pier Ave., the Lincoln could not be stopped until it reached 4 feet from the south curb. Actually, after applying the brakes gradually in a normal non -emergency manner, the Lincoln was stopped 111 feet from the AOI, 99 feet lesser in distance than indicated by the DMV analysis. If it takes 210 feet to stop traveling at 35 mph according to DMV, then by interpolation you can reasonably conclude that the approximate stopping distance from AOI traveling at: (1) (2). (3) Miles DMV Approximate Post Accident Actual Emergeney Per Hour Stopping Distance Stopping Distance Reconstructed Formula: 20 40 feet 36 feet (3) 36 (2) 40 (1) 20 equals 18 mph Result: Lincoln was traveling approximately 18 miles per hour at AOI, area of impact. 2 • • Officer Lobue has stated that "He got out of the car with the door slightly open (with his left hand on it), and lifted his body up off of the seat." He states he "was standing just outside of the car with his left hand still on the door and his left foot on the ground when it was hit by V-1 (Lincoln) traveling north on Monterey. In order to verify this statement, I have endeavored to get my left leg out of my Lincoln (essentially the same door opening specifications as a Ford Crown Victoria) with the door slightly open, but was unable to get my leg out of the door. My leg could not be placed on the ground until the door was at least 3/4 open. The door to my Lincoln, when fully opened, measures 40 inches from the body of the car. Using this analogy, (door 3/4 open) his door would have been opened and extended outward about 30 inches. The Traffic Collision Report summary states that P-1 (Hauser) hit the driver's side door of V-2 (Ford), while it was stopped. ---- My analysis, borne out by the photographs of damage to the Lincoln (refer to pictures #6 and #7), and damage to the Ford (refer to pictures #8 through #14), shows that Hauser did not hit the Ford's door. But rather as the police car's door was opened wide after the front part of the Lincoln had passed the area of impact, the edge of the left front door and molding on the Ford started to impact the right front door molding of the Lincoln just under the rear of the door handle, extending to the back door. The report further concludes that the extent of the damage to the vehicles appeared to have been caused by the Lincoln traveling at a speed somewhere between 30-35 mph. The above -noted DMV Stopping Distance analysis shows that the Lincoln's speed approximated 18 mph. I have been told by Mr. Bob Reid, owner of South Bay Auto in Redondo Beach, (where I had the Lincoln repaired) that the damage to the vehicles, under the same set of circumstances, could have been the same regardless whether the passing vehicle was traveling 10 mph or 60 mph. This is not a case where the Lincoln moved to the right (turning movement), hitting the door of the Ford, as inferred by the officer citing Hauser for violation of Vehicle Code Section 22107: "Turning Movements and Required Signals No person shall turn a vehicle from a direct course or move right or left upon a roadway until such movement can be made with reasonable safety and then only after the giving of an appropriate signal in the manner provided in this chapter in the event any other vehicle may be affected by the movement." This Vehicle Code Section clearly does not apply. The Lincoln had not turned from a direct course. The Lincoln was traveling in a straight path down the roadway as it passed the Ford. There is no reason why the Lincoln would have veered to the right into the Ford's door. It must be noted (picture #3 and #4) that the Ford was parked at an angle, and not parallel, to the curb in back of the vehicle the police officer had traffic stopped. In this position, with the rear of the Ford jutting out into the roadway, the Lincoln, if too close to the Ford at the beginning of its pass, would have collided with the rear fender of the police car. It is evident that the Lincoln had already cleared the rear fender of the Ford when the front door of the Ford was inadvertently opened and extended into the side of the Lincoln. The Report also states that the Lincoln was in violation of Vehicle Code Section 22350 -- unsafe speed for conditions. Hauser was fully aware that the rear of the police car extended into the roadway and that the emergency lights were flashing. It is the contention of Hauser that he was passing the Ford at a safe speed under the circumstances, approximately 18 mph, as determined by the DMV Stopping Distance analysis set forth above. The Report states that it appeared that Hauser was traveling at a speed somewhere between 30-35 mph. It is stated that this same speed was approximated by both officer Lobue and the witness, Grosch. It is difficult to understand how both Lobue and Grosch came to the same approximate speed estimate. Lobue stated that he was standing just outside of the car when the impact occurred. Grosch stated that he was leaning over to get his driver's license and information for officer Lobue. Under these traumatic conditions, in the flash of a moment, how can a person instantly turn one's head quickly enough to accurately approximate the speed of a vehicle passing by. 3 • • Pictures #3 and #4 show a newspaper and scattered papers on the dashboard. At the time of the accident, the newspaper was on my wife's lap and the miscellaneous papers were in the glove compartment. These papers were placed on the dashboard after the accident occurred. The view through the windshield was unobscured at the time of the accident. An observation: The police report under the caption SUMMARY, line 30, refers to picture #1. A comparison of pictures #1 and #2 with #3 and #4 reveals that after Hauser's and Grosch' s automobiles had left the scene of the accident, pictures #1 and #2 were taken, apparently to show that the Ford's emergency lights were on and visible from the rear. It appears that the police car may have been moved from its original position at the time of the accident, closer to curb with the rear of the car much nearer to the curb than shown in pictures #3 and #4. It is assumed that the Ford may have been moved closer to the curb to change the prior position of the police car's rear end jutting out hazardously' into the roadway, as shown in pictures #3 and #4. No mention in the report is made that pictures #1 and #2 were taken after the Ford's original position may have been changed. When analyzing pictures #1 and #2, this change in position, if in fact the police car was moved nearer to the curb, may alter conclusions made as to the conditions on the roadway at the time of the accident. The Traffic Collision Report places the blame for the accident on Hauser. Nothing is said that officer Lobue, in fact, opened his front door into the side of the Lincoln, clearly in violation of California Vehicle Code Section 22517, just as Hauser was passing in a straight path down the driving lane. End of Statement 4 • • Wednesday, December 29, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council Jan 11th, 2005 PURCHASE OF NEW DIGITAL RECORDERS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council: ////4--s- 1. Authorize the purchase of twenty (20) Sony digital recorders for the traffic and patrol officers at a total cost of $6,968.58. Background The Police Department is currently purchasing the first phase of a digital recording/storage system that will eventually include: 1) A Police Station (Jail/Lobby) digital recording and digital storage system. 2) Digital patrol car cameras. 3) Personal digital audio recording devices. The Sony digital recorders listed above will initially be used as the primary audio recording devices for the officers to record police/public contacts in the field.. These devices will later become back-up recorders when we move to a device that transmits digital audio data back to the patrol car where it is stored with the digital image from the car camera. This purchase is being made directly from Sony which is the sole source for this device. FISCAL IMPACT The funds required for the purchase of these recorders have been appropriated in the COPS Fund for the 2004/2005 fiscal year as a portion of the Digital patrol car camera system. Twenty (20) Sony digital recorders at a cost of $5,399.20 with Twenty (20) 128 MB Memory Sticks at a cost of $899.80 plus tax and shipping of $669.58 equals a total cost of $6968.58. This price includes a government purchase discount. Resp = tf � y s r,• itted, C Michae _ in St �%' e' : urre Chief • r olive City Manager Hermosa Beach Police Department Fiscal Impact, i o Finance director 2k Sony E Solutions Company 10900 Stouelske Ord. 8210 Austlu, TX 78759 Prepared For:; e-mai):• IttcheCOlbettrtaaehch Phone::. 310-:318-0302: g < Faxc.. 310•.798-8926 Olt! .Eckettt Hcrmosa•Bc'acli ?slice Dcpatiincnt :1315 ,Valley. Dtive •:• ; Heirrtose Haack CA 9tlZ54: Th.tnk you tar dw opportunity to quote. This quotation u valid fix thirty (10) days from are date Lased and may not be extended. 1TE111 QTY 1 20 MODEL ICD-BM1 2 20 MSH -128 *Opeu market price DESCRIPTION • Quote Date: 12/29/04 Quote Number 122904 Special Comments: Submitted By: Shawn Guzman EducstioneLCoc l Government • Sony glectroNps Deed Sales Division 666.639.9424 6e6.646.9744 F3X aignagadialtn.aenv.cem Sony Digital Voice Recorder Slide control malts* operation Includes one 10M0 Memory Stilt* Compellble with Dragon Naturally Speaking Proferred Yoke to Print Software Voice e -mall function Alarm playback function 128 MB Memory Stick Media !:;13Kt JJNIT PRIC ; EXIEASOIN OW $269.96 $5,399.20 oM• 544.99 "'PLEASE NOTE THAT STATE/LOCAL TAXES MAY APPLY**** lilt Softy Qovoflnuern Ctmtracta terms and condition, along with dm following (if nuked) comprise the tams and conditions upon which acts prielng k predicatot. P;tymem terms are Nit 10, ou approved erndtt. 711 ',i nN sed SUB TOTAL SHIPPING COST TAx TOTAL 8899.80 16,299.00 $149.92 $51.9.66 !16,968.58 Wd 8521 03M b00Z-6Z-O34 December 29, 2004 • Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council January 11, 2005 REQUEST TO PURCHASE LOCKERS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Authorize the purchase and installation of new lockers for the men and women's locker rooms in the Police Station by Engineered Storage Systems, Inc. City of Industry, California in the amount of $17,996.00 (tax included) BACKGROUND: The basement of the police department was remodeled in 1994. This included the men and women's locker rooms. However the new lockers were too small and this has been a continuing problem for officers storing their equipment and uniforms. Two lockers were issued to each officer to accommodate the equipment. But the narrow width prevented officers from storing their duty bags and other larger equipment It has been the desire of the police department for several years to replace the small lockers with larger lockers that would accommodate the officer's needs. ANALYSIS: The police department prepared and published a RFP for new lockers on December 1, 2004. The bids were opened on December 23, 2004. Three bids were received from Engineered Storage Systems ($17,996.00), McMurray Stems ($30,763.00), and Rusco, Inc. ($22,261.00). All three proposals were evaluated and Engineered Storage Systems submitted the lowest price and fulfilled the requirements of the RFP. Engineered Storage deals with Republic Lockers, which is the same brand as the lockers we currently have. Engineered Storage will be taking our old lockers in trade and added a credit into their bid price. It is recommended that Engineered Storage be awarded the bid. FISCAL IMPACT: The monies for this project were appropriated in the 2004/2005 FY budget under the COPS Grant program. Respectfully ub 14 Mich - = Lan ephen urrell Chief of P • ice City Manager Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director 21 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH — BID OPENING LOG SHEET Project Name: P4 2tio Zee.. a 3, 09-00Y Date: Bidder's Name 1) 21 i4 LIfic 2) LIP c 771 GlA/ 4 �� 3) EP Page /of Amount of Bid i7J 99t, Do 50, 7&3 , 0-41. Uv +, 4) 5) 6) Attest: DEC 2 3 2004 G� ;X: -.11K CITY Of HERMOSAbfACH Office of the City Clerk - 1315 Valley Drive - Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 • oVoLs PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 7, 2004 MEETING The meeting was called to order by Commissioner Hollander at 7:02 p.m. Roll Call: Present: Commissioners Fishman, Hollander, Bell, Sigler. Absent: Francis Also Present: Lisa Lynn Pledge of Allegiance: Agnes Slater Approval of October 5, 2004 Minutes Motion: "To approve as submitted." Fishman/Sigler — All Ayes Public Comment None Correspondence None Matters for Commission Consideration A. Fort Lots -o -Fun Playground Proposal: Ken Bergeron, 522 Prospect Mr. Bergeron, a member on the board of Friends of the Park, an organization started in 2003, gave a slide presentation, briefly highlighted below: • History: Fort Lots -o -Fun is located at 6th and Prospect, built in 1956 and originally attached to the school. The original equipment is still in use, except for some minor renovations. • Mission: Areas of concern for Friends of the Park are to bring the community together, in an effort to provide safe outdoor environments. The goal is to 1 2m understand the needs of the- community which includes parents, children and businesses. • Pumpkins in the Park: In October 2003, 75 pumpkins were given away with 500 guests in attendance and donations exceeded expectation. During this event, attendees where polled on suggestions for Fort Lots -o -Fun. October 2004, 250 pumpkins were given away with in excess of 700 guests. During this event, Friends of the Park compiled suggestions for improvement which focus on landscaping, irrigation and equipment. The group met with several playground equipment vendors. During these two events, approximately $5,000 was raised toward the Park Project. • Culled from various proposals, the main focus of the renovation is to have a fun park, a safe park and a park that adds value to the community. • A diagram image was shown to summarize community concerns: larger play equipment, grass area, tricycle track, tree preservation and irrigation system. Safety issues included entering/exiting the park, fences and overall compliance per ADA (American Disabilities Act). Friends of the Park is looking for more involvement/memberships and ideas. The monthly meetings are held on the second Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. in the Community Center, Room 4. Once this project is completed, Friends of the Park plans to move to other parks within Hermosa Beach. Mr. Bergeron also issued a challenge to business to help parks. Discussion/Questions from the Commission: Commissioners Hollander and Bell thanked Mr. Bergeron for his presentation. Both commented on the groups dedication, energy and spirit. Commissioner Fishman gave a summation: Friends of the Park is seeking Commission's recommendation to City Council to approve the proposed renovation project. It was also stated that the decision for no swings was made out of a need for greater space/usability. Friends of the Park will give the city $10,000 towards the renovation project. The Friends of the Park has raised $13,500 toward park renovation projects and they are hoping the City Council will approve additional money. Mr. Bergeron added there are other fundraising activities in progress, such as the banner program, which will raise additional money from advertisement and is primarily geared towards Fort Lots -o -Fun. Commissioner Fishman asked about the bike path which was not mentioned in the presentation. Mr. Bergeron stated that more grass was requested and due to the layout of the park it is underutilized. It has been requested that a path along the perimeter (if landscaping is done right) can be used for kids — tricycles, scooters, toddlers — keeping safety in mind. 2 P&R 12/7/04 Minutes Angie Heyming, 330 Culper Court 1. Current President 2. The current design is a result of lots of work, meetings, talking with residents, community ideas and suggestions 3. A good project for the Commission to support Agnes Slater, 1146 %2 6th Street 1. Lives near park 2. Excited about the renovation as she has small children and utilizes the park frequently 3. The play structure is a perfect size Motion by Commissioner Fishman to approve the Fort Lots -o -Fun renovation project as submitted. Commissioner Bell seconded the motion. Ayes: Commissioners Fishman, Hollander, Sigler, Bell Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None B. Beach Volleyball Net Sponsorship: Lisa Lynn presented this item to Commission for consideration. Throughout the year Community Resources has received numerous requests from commercial groups to place their names on the nets which they provide as an advertising tool. As there is a small budget for nets, posts and maintenance, this has always been a welcomed request and historically, there has been no fee associated with these requests. Staff recommends implementing a $1,000 fee per net, per year. The area encompasses 10th to 14th Streets. The advertising group would supply the net with their logo and would be responsible for installation (per City standards) and at the end of the year, the nets become the property of the City. Discussion/Questions from Commission: 1. Commissioner Hollander: Has proposal been submitted to potential sponsors? Lisa Lynn - Yes and they are very willing. Placement at North Courts will augment maintenance, repair and replacement cost. One commercial group has agreed to purchase all 10 nets north of the pier. 2. It was asked if users of courts bring their own nets. No, all nets stay throughout the year. 3. Courts on 2"d Street nets experience theft and there are some nets which are replaced by the City and some nets which are installed by residents/users. 4. Sponsors of tournaments would be allowed to remove sponsor nets and replace at end of event. 5. If sponsor nets are stolen, they are replaced by the City. 6. It was agreed that a monitoring system be implemented for net removal/replacement during event. It was suggested that one person is responsible for all removals and 3 P&R 12/7/04 Minutes replacement to facilitate monitoring. All nets are the same price on a first come, first served basis with a one (1) year contract. 7. Commercial groups are allowed to pick which nets/locations they would like to purchase. This program is similar to the banner program already in place. 8. Suggested buying two nets at a slightly reduced price and split up locations. 9. Noted that this program also includes the South Courts. 10. It was stated that all wording on nets will be reviewed by Staff. 11. All nets will have `Property of Hermosa Beach'. 12. Commissioner Sigler stated that he has a potential 'net czar' for consideration. 13. Clarified that this is for net sponsorship only as poles are provided by the City. Motion by Commissioner Sigler to approve the proposal for annual sponsorship of nets as provided by Staff. Commissioner Fishman seconded the motion. Ayes: Commissioners Fishman, Hollander, Sigler, Bell Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None Carline Beste, 26th Street 1. Lines damaged 2. Replace lines and add wording (advertisements) 3. Expressed concern regarding alcohol or tobacco wording on nets 4. Agrees with $1;000 fee for 10th to 14th street - 5. Suggested $500 for City courts on other streets near 22nd Street and suggested that business between 2nd Street might be willing to advertise as well Commissioner Sigler asked about money that is not used for maintenance, can it be used for line replacement and what happens with the money if it is not all used. Lisa Lynn stated that the money in the proposal, the lines, equipment, balls, etc. are included and any money that is not used during that year will remain in the budget. Staff Report(s) Lisa Lynn gave the following report for September and October: Fall registration has declined, as is usual compared to the Summer months. Parenting classes are the most popular with waiting lists. Revenue is still ahead. September is $15,000 ahead from last year and October is relatively the same at approximately $3,000 ahead from last year. Year-to-date is $46,000 over from last year. As people are already asking about next year's camp, the camp has been extended to 9 weeks. Registration will be included in the Summer Celebration event next year, the same as this year. The goal is to get the brochure out early, beginning of May, for summer which will match other surrounding cities. The Hermosa Beach's brochure is 4 P&R 12/7/04 Minutes printed only three (3) times per year and not four (4). The number of recreation leadership staff will need to increase in order to meet demand for youth programs. Commissioner's Reports: Hermosa Arts Foundation - Commissioner Hollander: There is a new board in place with lots of activities planned. There is a grant writer working on a grant. There have been many requests from the community for the use of the theater. Check your calendar often for new events. Friends of the Park Foundation — Hollander: Thanked the attending members of the Friends of the Park for their informative presentation already given and looking forward to Edith Rodaway Park renovation once Fort Lots -o -Fun is completed. Museum Subcommittee Report — Commission Fishman: A book company has contacted the Historical Society to do a pictorial on Hermosa Beach. The contract includes royalties and the opportunity to buy the finished books in books at a reduced cost and resell. The books will be marketed throughout the United States. The rant surveyor, Jane Pieplow will be in town for consulting beginning December 16 — 18t with the Museum Collection Department to discuss taking better care of museum items. Ms. Pieplow's services were paid for by a grant. Commissioner Hollander: Volunteers are needed at the Christmas Tree lot run by Kiwanis. All proceeds go to local charities. Commissioner Sigler: Casino Night (with fake money), December 10th at Sangria. Admission is $50. Proceeds will go towards toys for underprivileged children in the surrounding communities. Breakfast with Santa, December 19th, co-sponsored with Kids with Cancer at the Kiwanis Club. Lisa Lynn: December 11th, Breakfast with Santa in the Park is sold out. Youth Surf Competition, Saturday, December 1 lth New Years Eve Celebration, 8:00 p.m., Pier Plaza. Entertainment provided by Big Band 2000. Items Requested by Commissioners None Other Matters 5 P&R 12/7/04 Minutes None Public Comment N/A Motion: "To Adjourn at 7:48 p.m." Fishman/Sigler — All Ayes 6 P&R 12/7/04 Minutes FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES January 11, 2005 Prepared for CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Prepared by DAVID TAUSSIG & ASSOCIATE -s, -INC. 1301 Dove Street, Suite 600 Newport Beach, CA 92660 • ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY. VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913," being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with the Resolution of Intention, being Resolution No. 04-6368, adopted by.the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach (the "City Council"), STATE OF CALIFORNIA, in connection with the proceedings for ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (Bay View Drive) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"), the undersigned herewith submits the Report for the Assessment District (the "Report"), consisting of six (6) parts ("Parts") as follows: PART I - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements are on file in the Offices of the City Clerk and the Director of Public Works/City Engineer of the City of Hermosa Beach (the "City") and are referenced herein and incorporated as if attached and a part of this Report. This Part also contains a description of the proposed improvements to be installed by the Assessment District. PART II - IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE This Part contains an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith. PART III - ANNUAL ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS This Part contains the maximum annual amount to be assessed to pay costs associated with the administration and collection of assessments, administration or registration of bonds, and/or reserve -er-other related funds. PART IV - ASSESSMENT ROLL This Part contains the following information: 1. A proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the proposed improvements upon the several subdivisions of land within the Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such subdivisions, from said improvements, as set forth upon the assessment roll filed herewith and made a part thereof; and 2. A proposed maximum annual assessment upon the several subdivisions of land within the Assessment District to pay costs incurred by the City and not otherwise reimbursed which result from the administration and collection of assessments. Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 fr • • PART V - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM This Part contains a diagram showing the Assessment District, the boundaries and the dimensions of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention, and is filed herewith and made a part hereof, and part of the assessment. PART VI - REPORT UNDER PART 7.5 OF DIVISION 4 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE This Part satisfies the requirements of Part 7.5 of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931," which is Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. This Part identifies the total principal amount of all unpaid special assessments required or proposed to be levied, the total true value of the parcels within the Assessment District, and the total amount of the principal sum of unpaid special assessments proposed by this Assessment District. PART VII - CERTIFICATES This Part shall consist of sub -parts with the following information: A. Rights-of-way certificate; and B. Environmental certification. Dated this /1 day of ,/l ^ , 2005. NQ. C23473 i m C'/`/ F� / C ENG\ 4'v David Taussig & Associates, Inc. Assessment Engineer City of Hermosa Beach State of California Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 3 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 f �► PRELIMINARY APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ON THE DAY OF , 2005. City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach State of California FINAL APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ON THE DAY OF , 2005. • City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach State of California Preliminary Engineer's Report City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 Page 4 January 11, 2005 s • ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PART I PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS The plans and specifications which describe the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements for the Assessment District are on file in the Offices of the City Clerk and the Director of Public Works/City Engineer of the City and are referenced herein and incorporated as if attached and a part of this Report. A general description of the improvements is set forth below. DESCRIPTION OF WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT The works of improvements to be financed by the Assessment District will include the undergrounding of overhead electric, telephone, and cable services. The undergrounding work will involve the removal of poles and overhead wires, guys and anchors, and the installation of streetlights, conduit, and electric, telephone, and cable services, appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith. The existing overhead utilities which will be undergrounded run southerly along Bay View Drive and Palm Drive from Pier Avenue to just south of 10th Street. Certain overhead telephone utilities along 10th Street between Palm Drive and Monterey Boulevard will also be removed. Generally, the underground utility service will be installed in Bay View Drive and Palm Drive between Pier Avenue and just south of 10th Street. In Palm Drive the utilities will be undergrounded south of 10th Street to the second existing utility pole. In Bay View Drive the electric facilities will be undergrounded to 10th Street and telephone facilities will be undergrounded approximately to the south property line of the first lot south of 10th Street. In addition, underground utilities will be extended in 10th Street between Bay View Drive and just west of Monterey Boulevard to serve the property located at the southeast corner of 10th Street and Monterey Boulevard. Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 5 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 • • ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PART II IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE This Part presents the estimated cost of the works of improvements. Table 11-1 shows the cost of the works of improvements. Pursuant to California Public Utilities Commission Rule 20B, Southern California Edison provides a subsidy to the cost of works of improvement in an amount equal to the cost of an equivalent overhead electric system, plus the cost of removing the existing overhead system. In addition, the City will fund the cost of repairing and resurfacing the streets after the utilities have been undergrounded. The costs shown in Table II -1 are net of the contributions from Southern California Edison and the City. The estimated assessment amount corresponding to the net cost of the works of improvements is shown in Table II -2. The net improvement costs will be assessed to each property in accordance with the Method of Assessment presented in Exhibit A. The Assessment Roll identifying each parcel of real property within the Assessment District and its assessment is included in Exhibit B. As with the description of the improvements, the improvement costs are preliminary estimates. Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 6 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 1 • TABLE II -1 UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT BAY VIEW DRIVE GROSS IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE Net Costs Assessed I. Construction Costs A. Utility Undergrounding Improvements & Street Lights i. Electric $390,633 ii. Telephone $408,052 iii.Cable 11,500 Subtotal Construction $810,185 B. Construction Contingencies $157,615 Total Construction Costs $967,800 II. Right of Way Acquisition III. Design A. Design i. Electric $30,000 ii. Telephone 8,000 iii.Cable 3,000 Subtotal Design $41,000 B. Design Contingencies $8,200 Total Design $49,200 TOTAL $1,017,000 Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 7 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 • • TABLE II -2 UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT BAY VIEW DRIVE BOND ASSESSMENT ESTIMATE Estimated Costs and Expenses As Preliminarily As Description Approved Confirmed I. Construction Costs A. Utility Undergrounding Improvements & Street Lights i. Electric ii. Telephone iii.Cable Subtotal Construction B. Construction Contingencies Total Construction II. Right of Way Acquisition III. Design A. Design i. Electric ii. Telephone iii.Cable Subtotal Design B. Design Contingencies Total Design IV. Assessment District Procedural and Formation Costs V. Bond Issuance Costs A. Capitalized Interest B. Reserve Fund C. Underwriter's Discount D. Professional Services Total Bond Issuance Costs Total Amount to Assessment $390,633 $390,633 $408,052 $408,052 11,500 11,500 $810,185 $810,185 $162,037 $157,615 $972,222 $967,800 $30,000 8,000 3,000 $41,000 $8,200 $49,200 $30,000 $34,050 10,000 0 39.528 $30,000 8,000 3,000 $41,000 $8,200 $49,200 $30,000 $33,913 10,000 0 39,528 $83,578 $83,441 $1,135,000 $1,130,441 Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 8 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 • • Recapitulation — Bay View Drive Utility Undergrounding Improvements Estimated Costs and Expenses As Preliminarily As Description Approved Confirmed I. Construction Costs $972,222 $967,800 II. Right of Way Acquisition 0 0 III. Design 49,200 49,200 IV. Assessment District Procedural and Formation Costs $30,000 30,000 V. Bond Issuance Costs $83,578 $83,441 Total Amount to Assessment $1,135,000 $1,130,441 Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 9 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 i ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PART III ANNUAL ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, an Annual Administrative Assessment shall be levied on each parcel and subdivision of land within the Assessment District to pay for the necessary costs and expenses incurred, and not otherwise reimbursed, resulting from the administration and collection of assessments and from the administration or registration of any bonds and/or reserve or other related funds. The maximum amount of such Annual Administrative Assessment for the Assessment District shall not exceed a total of $7,500 which may increase annually at a compound rate beginning January 1, 2005, by the lesser of (i) five percent (5%), or (ii) the annualized positive change, if any, in the U.S. Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, for Los Angeles — Riverside — Orange County, as of January 1 of each year. The Annual Administrative Assessment for each such parcel of land shall be computed based on that parcel's proportionate share of the total annual assessment (exclusive of the Annual Administrative Assessment). The Annual Administrative Assessment is in lieu of the $8.00 per assessment installment allowed by law. Preliminary Engineer's Report City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 Page 10 January 11, 2005 1 • • ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PART IV ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, on November 23, 2004, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, did, pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913," being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California and as amended, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 04-6368, for the construction of certain improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 2004-2 (Bay View Drive) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and, WHEREAS, said Resolution of Intention, as required by law, did direct the appointed Assessment Engineer to make and file a Report, consisting of the following: 1. Plans; 2. Specifications; 3. General Descriptions; 4. Cost estimate; 5. Assessment Diagram showing the Assessment District and the subdivisions of land contained therein; and 6. A proposed assessment of the costs and expenses of the works of improvement levied upon the parcels and lots of land within the boundaries of the Assessment District. For particulars, reference is made to the Resolution of Intention as previously adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, I, the undersigned, authorized representative of David Taussig & Associates, Inc., the duly appointed ASSESSMENT ENGINEER, pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913," do hereby submit the following: 1. Pursuant to the provisions of law and the Resolution of Intention, I have assessed the costs and expenses of the works of improvements to be performed in the Assessment District upon the parcels of land in the Assessment District benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C; 2. As required by law, the Assessment Diagram is hereto attached, showing the Assessment District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 11 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 • • parcels and subdivisions of land within said Assessment District as the same existed at the time of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots respectively have been identified by Assessor's Parcel Number and Assessment Number upon said Assessment Diagram and in said Assessment Roll; 3. The subdivisions and parcels of land and the numbers shown on the respective Assessment Diagram as attached hereto correspond with the numbers as appearing on the Assessment Roll as contained herein as Exhibit B; 4. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that serial bonds to represent unpaid assessments, which bear interest at a fixed or variable interest rate and term of not to exceed twelve percent per annum or such higher maxim interest rate as may be permitted by law, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided in Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code (the Improvement Bond Act of 1915) and the last installment of such bonds shall mature in not to exceed 39 years from the second of September next succeeding 12 months from their date. The alternate procedure for collecting assessments and advance retirement of bonds as set forth in Part 11.1 of Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code shall apply herein. Pursuant to Section 8650.1 of said Code, the City Council may determine to issue said bonds so that other than an equal annual proportion of the principal amount shall mature each year; 5. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, an annual assessment shall be levied on each parcel and subdivision of land within the Assessment District to pay for the necessary costs and expenses incurred, and not otherwise reimbursed, resulting from the administration and collection of assessments and from the administration or registration of any bonds and/or reserve or other related funds (the "Annual Administrative Assessment"). The maximum amount of such Annual Administrative Assessment for the Assessment District shall not exceed a total of $7,500 which may increase annually at a compound rate beginning January 1, 2005, by the lesser of (i) five percent (5%), or (ii) the annualized positive change, if any, in the U.S. Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, for Los Angeles — Riverside — Orange County, as of January 1 of each year. The Annual Administrative Assessment for each such parcel of land shall be computed based on that parcel's proportionate share of the total annual assessment (exclusive of the Annual Administrative Assessment). The Annual Administrative Assessment is in lieu of the $8.00 per assessment installment allowed by law; 6. By virtue of the authority contained in said "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" and by further direction and order of the legislative body, I hereby make the following Assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the works of improvements for the Assessment District based on the costs and expenses as set forth below: Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 12 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 • • i BAY VIEW DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING IMPROVEMENTS As Preliminarily Approved As Confirmed I. Construction Costs $972,222 $967,800 II. Right of Way Acquisition 0 0 III. Design 49,200 49,200 IV. Assessment District Procedural and Formation Costs 30,000 30,000 V. Bond Issuance Costs 83,578 83,441 TOTAL BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT $1,135,000 $1,130,441 7. The Method of Spread of Assessment is as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto, referenced and so incorporated. ,q' R& David Taussig & Associates, Inc. co v 2� No. C23473 Assessment ngineer City of Hermosa Beach State of California Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 13 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 • • ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PART V DIAGRAM OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram (8.5 inches by 11 inches) is attached hereto as Exhibit C. A full-size copy of the Assessment Diagram (18 inches by 26 inches) is on file with the Office of the City Clerk of the City. Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 14 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 • • ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PART VI REPORT UNDER PART 7.5 OF DIVISION 4 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE Pursuant to the aforesaid Resolution of Intention, it has been provided that the requirements of Division 4 of the California Streets and Highways Code shall be satisfied with Part 7.5 of said Division 4. Accordingly, the following is presented: The total amount, as near as can be determined, of the total principal amount of all unpaid special assessments and special assessments required or proposed to be levied under any completed or pending assessment proceedings, other than contemplated in the instant proceedings is: $13,690 The total true value, as near as may be determined, of the parcels of land and improvements which are proposed to be assessed in the instant proceedings, as determined by the full cash value of the parcels as shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of the County of Los Angeles is: $51,024,380 The total amount of the principal sum of the special assessments proposed to be levied in the instant proceedings is: $1,135,000 The total amount of the principal sum of unpaid special assessments levied against the parcels proposed to be assessed, as computed pursuant to paragraph 1 above, plus the principal amount of the special assessment proposed to be levied in the instant proceedings from paragraph 3 above is: Dated: No. C23473 m $1,148,690 vid Taussig & Associates, Inc ENGv-<" Q : GAIr\4� Assessment ' ngineer City of Hermosa Beach State of California Preliminary Engineer's Report City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 Page 15 January 11, 2005 • • ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PART VII (A) RIGHTS-OF-WAY CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH The undersigned hereby CERTIFIES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY that the following is all true and correct. ' At all times herein mentioned, the undersigned was, and now is, the duly appointed DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER of the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California. That there have now been instituted proceedings under the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913," being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain improvements in a special Assessment District known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 2004-2 (Bay View Drive) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"). THE UNDERSIGNED STATES AND CERTIFIES AS FOLLOWS: All easements, rights-of-way, or land necessary for the accomplishment of improvements for the above referenced Assessment District will be in the possession of the Assessment District prior to the ordering of the works of improvements. EXECUTED this day of , 2005, at City of Hermosa Beach, California. City Engineer City of Hermosa Beach State of California Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 16 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 • • ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PART VII (B) CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEEDINGS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH The undersigned, under penalty of perjury, CERTIFIES as follows: 1. That I am the person authorized to prepare and process all environmental documentation as needed as it relates to the formation of the special assessment district being formed pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913," being Division 12 of the .Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 2004-2 (Bay View Drive) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); 2. The specific environmental proceedings relating to this Assessment District that have been completed are as follows: The Assessment District qualifies for a categorical exemption to the CEQA; and 3. I do hereby certify that all environmental evaluation proceedings necessary for the formation of the Assessment District have been completed to my satisfaction, and that no further environmental_ roceedings are necessary. EXECUTED this day of , 2005, at City of Hermosa Beach, California. Planning Manager City of Hermosa Beach State of California K:\Clients2\Hermosa Beach\Bay View AD\Bayview Final Engineer's Report 8.doc Preliminary Engineer's Report Page 17 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 i • EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH METHOD OF SPREAD OF ASSESSMENT Assessments levied pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") must be based on the benefit which each property receives from the improvements. As a result of Proposition 218, more stringent standards have been imposed for determining benefit. For example, Proposition 218 requires that special and general benefits be separated, with the amount of any assessment limited to the special benefits so conferred. Neither the Act nor Proposition 218 specifies the method or formula for apportioning benefit or distinguishing special from general benefits. Identification of the benefit that the improvements will render to the properties in the Assessment District is the first step in developing the assessment spread methodology. The next step is to determine if the properties in the Assessment District receive a direct and special benefit from the improvements which is distinct from benefit received by the general public. For this Assessment District these determinations were made by David Taussig & Associates, Inc. ("DTA"), the Assessment Engineer. Special and General Benefit The utility undergrounding improvements to be funded by the Assessment District specially benefit the properties within the Assessment District by enhancing the local streetscape and neighborhood appearance and the installation of a new and modernized utility infrastructure system. There is no general benefit as the Assessment District qualifies only as a "Rule 20B" undergrounding project. The California Public Utilities Commission's ("CPUC") Rule 20 sets policies and procedures for the conversion of overhead power lines and other equipment to underground facilities. As noted in CPUC Decision 01-12-009 dated December 11, 2001, undergrounding projects which are in the general public interest are funded pursuant to Rule 20A. Rule 20A criteria is as follows: • Unusually heavy concentration of overhead electric facilities; • The street or road or right-of-way (in which the utilities will be undergrounded) is extensively used by the general public and carries a heavy volume of pedestrian or vehicular traffic; and/or • The street or road or right-of-way (in which the utilities will be undergrounded) adjoins or passes through a civic area or public recreation area or an area of unusual scenic interest to the general public. In the case of the Assessment District, there is not an unusually heavy concentration of overhead electric facilities; civic, public recreation, or scenic areas adjoining Bay View Drive or Palm Drive, Preliminary Engineer's Report Page A-1 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January ll, 2005 • • and Bay View Drive and Palm Drive are narrow, local streets. In addition, the Assessment District will not bear the full burden of the undergrounding costs as Southern California Edison is required under Rule 20B to provide a subsidy in an amount equal to the cost of an equivalent overhead electric system, usually about twenty percent (20%) of the total undergrounding project cost, plus the cost of removing the existing overhead system, which can be five to twenty percent (5% — 20%) of the total cost and the City will fund the cost of repairing and resurfacing the streets after the utilities have been undergrounded. Assessment Methodology DTA has apportioned the utility undergrounding benefits on the basis of street frontage. This is a traditional assessment methodology and logically, the greater the frontage the greater the benefit conferred. In the case of condominiums, frontage is allocated equally to each condominium located on the original parcel. Note, the properties in the Assessment District are principally served from overhead utilities running along Bay View Drive and Palm Drive, and therefore, only frontage along these streets is assessed. Undergrounding benefits are weighted as follows: • 50% Streetscape Benefit: Enhanced streetscape and neighborhood'appearancet and • 50% Utility Benefit: New and modernized utility infrastructure system. Assessments are determined for each property within the District based upon the above benefits received. The following properties were determined to receive less than full benefit in one or both of these categories: • Assessment Numbers 77 through 85: The electric service has already been undergrounded for the commercial properties located on the west side of Palm Drive between Pier Avenue and 10th Street2. Therefore, these properties are given a fifty percent (50%) reduction with respect to the utility benefit since their electric transmission service is already undergrounded. These properties will receive the full streetscape benefit. • Assessment Numbers 1, 34, 42, 44, 51, 53, 61, 66, and 70: The original "street to street" lots corresponding to these assessment numbers have been subdivided resulting in "back" lots which do not front and do not take access from either Bay View Drive or Palm Drive. Therefore, these properties are not assessed for the streetscape benefit, but will receive the full utility benefit with the exception of Assessment Number 1. The utility services for Assessment Number 1 are not fed by the transmission facilities to be undergrounded in Bay View Drive, and therefore is not assessed. Frontage is allocated equally between these subdivided parcels for purposes of assessing for the utility benefit. • Assessment Number 76, 87, and 88: A fifty percent reduction to the streetscape benefit is given to Assessment Number 76 as a new down guy pole will be located approximately at its Note, the City of Hermosa Beach has no view ordinance and this report assumes•that none will be adopted during the life of the district. 2In addition, while certain utilities have been undergrounded in Pier Avenue, the electric service for Bay View Drive properties with frontage along Pier Avenue extends northerly from a vault in 10`h Street. Preliminary Engineer's Report Page A-2 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 - January 11, 2005 • • southern property line and be guyed back north along Palm Drivel. A one hundred percent reduction to the streetscape benefit is given to Assessment Number 88 as overhead facilities will run from an existing utility pole north across the property to the new down buy pole. Comparable credit is given to that portion of Assessment Number 87 located opposite of Assessment Numbers 76 and 78. • Assessment Numbers 35 and 55 through 58: These properties are given a fifty percent 50% reduction to the streetscape benefit as the remaining existing pole within the District will be guyed back north across these properties along Bay View Drive. These properties are also given a fifty percent 50% reduction to the utility benefit; while telephone utilities will be extended south of 10`h Street, electric facilities will not. While service to Assessment Number 34 will be undergrounded, service to Assessment Number 35 will remain overhead. Several properties have undergrounded the utility service connection to their properties; however these properties receive the full streetscape and utility benefit as the underground service connection does not alleviate the need to install new underground utility infrastructure nor has it resulted in the elimination of the existing overhead utility facilities. 'Note, the frontage for Assessment Number 87 which is south of Assessment Number 76 is not assessed as it lies beyond the undergrounding termination point. Preliminary Engineer's Report Page A-3 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January 11, 2005 In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for the above-referenced Assessment District have been spread in direct accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the works of improvement. ,re�pF tSti— 0'-- /1 2005. �<v4��Q�& N 4. ,<\\ Dated:, 16 cc co c� ��\ Davi Taussig & Associ . ; s, Inc. No. C23473 1 e. �._ ENGV:(c OF CAt.. Assessm t Engineer City of Hermosa Beach State of California I, , as CITY CLERK of the City of Hermosa Beach, CALIFORNIA do hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with the Diagram attached thereto, was recorded in my office on the day of , 2005. City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach State of California I, as CITY CLERK of the City of Hermosa Beach, CALIFORNIA do hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with the Diagram attached thereto, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City on the day of , 2005. City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach State of California I, , as DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER of the City of Hermosa Beach, CALIFORNIA do hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with Diagram attached thereto, was recorded in my office on the day of , 2005. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Hermosa Beach State of California Preliminary Engineer's Report Page A-4 City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 January II, 2005 • • EXHIBIT B ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ASSESSMENT ROLL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AD 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) ASSESSMENT ROLL APN 4187-006-003 4187-006-004 4187-006-005 4187-006-006 4187-006-007 4187-006-008 4187-006-009 4187-006-010 4187-006-011 4187-006-012 4187-006-013 4187-006-014 4187-006-015 4187-006-017 4187-006-018 4187-006-019 4187-006-020 4187-006-021 4187-006-023 4187-006-024 4187-006-025 4187-006-026 4187-006-027 4187-006-028 4187-007-001 4187-007-002 4187-007-003 4187-007-004 4187-007-030 4187-007-031 4187-008-001 4187-008-002 4187-008-056 4187-008-057 4187-008-058 4187-008-059 4187-009-001 4187-009-004 4187-009-005 4187-009-006 4187-009-007 4187-009-008 4187-009-011 4187-009-012 4187-009-013 4187-009-014 4187-009-017 4187-009-018 4187-009-020 4187-009-022 4187-009-023 ASSESSMENT NUMBER 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 59 60 61 62 63 65 66 67 68 69 72 73 70 71 85 64 74 75 76 88 87 86 34 35 55 56 57 58 54 49 48 47 46 45 40 39 12 13 16 17 20 23 24 STREET ADDRESS FRONTAGE UNADJUSTED TOTAL STREETSCAPE BENEFIT 1034 HERMOSA AVE 1042 HERMOSA AVE 1106 HERMOSA AVE 1110 HERMOSA AVE 1120 HERMOSA AVE 1128 HERMOSA AVE 1140 HERMOSA AVE 1144 HERMOSA AVE 1131 MANHATTAN AVE 1130 PALM DR 1125 MANHATTAN AVE 1128 PALM DR 0 1106 PALM DR 1045 MANHATTAN AVE 1046 PALM DR 1035 MANHATTAN AVE 1025 MANHATTAN AVE 1011 MANHATTAN AVE 131 10TH ST 1021 MANHATTAN AVE 1020 PALM DR 1014 HERMOSA AVE 1109 MANHATTAN AVE 150 IOTH ST 931 MANHATTAN AVE 928 PALM DR 921 MANHATTAN AVE 934 HERMOSA AVE 950 HERMOSA AVE 947 MONTEREY BLVD 226 10TH ST 214 10TH ST 210 10TH ST 220 IOTH ST 216 IOTH ST 1002 MANHATTAN AVE 1028 MANHATTAN AVE 1040 MANHATTAN AVE 1048 MANHATTAN AVE 1102 MANHATTAN AVE 1112 MANHATTAN AVE 1138 MANHATTAN AVE 1142 MANHATTAN AVE 1101 MONTEREY BLVD 1085 MONTEREY BLVD 1068 BAYVIEW DR 1057 MONTEREY BLVD 1047 MONTEREY BLVD 1035 MONTEREY BLVD 1027 MONTEREY BLVD 80.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 54.10 61.70 50.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 120.00 40.00 60.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 80.66 69.34 42.50 55.00 13.75 13.75 13.75 13.75 40.00 4000 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 37.00 43.00 29.09 29.09 29.09 29.09 29.09 GROSS 1 CREDIT 1 NET 40.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 27.05 30.85 25.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 20,00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 60.00 20.00 30.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 40.33 34.67 21.25 27.50 6.88 6.88 6.88 6.88 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.50 21.50 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (50.00%) (100.00%) (55.79%) 0.00% (100.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 00% 0.00% 40.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 27.05 30.85 25.00 0.00 15.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 60.00 20..00 30.00 15.00 7.50 0.00 17.83 34.67 0.00 13.75 3.44 3.44 3.44 3.44 2000 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.50 21.50 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 UTILITY BENEFIT GROSS 1 CREDIT 1 NET 40.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 27.05 30.85 25.00 7.50 7.50 20.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 60.00 20.00 30.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 40.33 34.67 10.63 13.75 6.88 6.88 6.88 6.88 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.50 21.50 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (50.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 20.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.53 30.85 25.00 7.50 7.50 20.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 30.00 20.00 30.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 40.33 34.67 10.63 6.88 3.44 3.44 3.44 3.44 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.50 21.50 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 ADJUSTED TOTAL 60.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 40.58 61.70 50.00 7.50 22.50 40.00 40,00 10.00 3000 40 00 40.00 40.00 40.00 10.00 30.00 90.00 40.00 60.00 30.00 22.50 15.00 58.16 69.34 10.63 20.63 6.88 6.88 6.88 6.88 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 37.00 43.00 29.10 29.10 29.10 29.10 29.10 AS PRELIMINARY APPROVED $24,533.20 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $16,590.58 $25,228.31 $20,444.34 $3,066.65 $9,199.95 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 $36,799.80 $16,355.47 $24,533.20 $12,266.60 $9,199.95 $6,133.30 $23,780.85 $28,352.20 $4,346.47 $8,433.29 $2,813.14 $2,813.14 $2,813.14 $2,813.14 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $15,128.81 $17,582.13 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $11,898 60 $11,898.60 AS CONFIRMED $24,533.20 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $12,266 60 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $16,590.58 $25,228.31 $20,444.34 $3,066.65 $9,199.95 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $4,088 87 $12,266.60 $36,799.80 $16,355.47 $24,533.20 $12,266.60 $9,199.95 $6,133.30 $23,780.85 $28,352.20 $4,346.47 $8,433.29 $2,813.14 $2,813.14 $2,813.14 $2,813.14 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $15,128.81 $17,582.13 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AD 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) ASSESSMENT ROLL APN ASSESSMENT NUMBER STREET ADDRESS 4187-009-024 25 1021 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-026 51 1022 MANHATTAN AVE 4187-009-027 50 1021 BAYVIEW DR 4187-009-028 41 1126 MANHATTAN AVE 4187-009-029 42 1126 MANHATTAN AVE 4187-009-030 43 1121 BAYVIEW DR 4187-009-031 44 1120 MANHATTAN AVE 4187-009-032 52 1011 BAYVIEW DR 4187-009-033 53 1012 MANHATTAN AVE 4187-009-034 14 1075 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-035 15 1069 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-036 38 1150 MANHATTAN AVE 4187-009-037 37 1158 MANHATTAN AVE 4187-009-038 36 200 PIER AVE 4187-009-039 2 238 PIER AVE 4187-009-040 I 240 PIER AVE 4187-009-041 3 1221 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-042 4 1215 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-043 5 1201 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-044 6 1137 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-045 7 1123 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-046 11 1103 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-048 8 1111 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-049 9 1113 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-050 10 1115 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-052 18 1051 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-053 19 1052 BAYVIEW DR 4187-009-055 26 1019 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-056 27 1017 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-057 28 1015 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-058 29 1013 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-059 30 1011 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-060 31 1009 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-061 32 1007 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-062 33 1005 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-064 21 1041 MONTEREY BLVD 4187-009-065 22 1042 BAYVIEW DR TOTAL FRONTAGE UNADJUSTED TOTAL STREETSCAPE BENEFIT GROSS 1 CREDIT 1 NET 29.09 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 29.10 29.09 40.00 30.00 235.00 44.60 44.60 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40,00 13.33 13.33 13.33 14.55 14.55 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 14.55 14.55 3,352.54 14.55 20.00 20.00 20,00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 14.55 14.55 20.00 15.00 117.50 22.30 22.30 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 6.67 6.67 6.67 7.28 7.28 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 7.28 7,28 0.00 (100.00%) 0.00% 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% UTILITY BENEFIT GROSS 1 CREDIT 1 NET 14.55 14.55 0.00 10.00 20.00 10.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 20 00 10.00 0.00 10.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 14.55 14.55 14,55 14.55 20.00 20.00 15.00 15.00 117.50 117.50 22.30 11.15 0.00 11.15 20,00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20,00 20.00 20.00 20.00 6.67 6.67 6.67 6.67 6.67 6.67 7.28 7.28 7.28 7.28 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6,82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6,82 6.82 6.82 6.82 7.28 7.28 7.28 7,28 ADJUSTED TOTAL AS PRELIMINARY APPROVED AS CONFIRMED 0.00% 14.55 29.10 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 0.00% 10.00 10.00 $4,088.87 $4,088.87 0.00% 10.00 30.00 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 0.00% 10.00 30.00 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 0.00% 10.00 10.00 $4,088.87 ' $4,088.87 0.00% 10.00 30,00 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 0.00% 10.00 10.00 $4,088.87 $4,088,87 0.00% 10.00 30,00 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 0.00% 10.00 10.00 $4,088.87 $4,088.87 0.00% 14.55 29,10 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 0.00% 14.55 29.10 $11,898,60 $11,898.60 0.00% 20.00 40.00 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 0.00% 15.00 30.00 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 0.00% 117.50 235.00 $96,088.38 $96,088.38 0.00% 11.15 33.45 $13,677.26 $13,677.26 (100.00%) 0.00 0.00 $4,559.09 $0.00 0.00% 20.00 40.00 $16,355,47 $16,355,47 0.00% 20.00 40.00 $16,355.47 $16,355,47 0.00% 20.00 40.00 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 0.00% 20.00 40.00 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 0.00% 20.00 40.00 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 0.00% 20.00 40,00 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 0.00% 6.67 13.34 $5,454.56 85,454,56 0.00% 6.67 13.34 85,454,56 $5,454.56 0,00% 6.67 . 13.34 $5,454.56 85,454,56 0.00% 7,28 14.56 $5,953 39 $5,953.39 0.00% 7.28 14.56 $5,953.39 $5,953.39 0.00% 6.82 13.64 $5,577.21 $5,577.21 0.00% 6.82 13.64 $5,577,21 $5,577.21 0.00% 6.82 13.64 $5,577.21 85,577,21 0.00% 6.82 13.64 $5,577.21 $5,577.21 0.00% 6.82 13.64 $5,577.21 $5,577.21 0.00% 6.82 13.64 $5,577.21 $5,577.21 0.00% 6.82 13,64 $5,577.21 $5,577.21 0.00% 6.82 13.64 85,577,21 $5,577.21 0.00% 7.28 14,56 $5,953.39 $5,953.39 0.00% 7.28 14.56 $5,953.39 $5,953.39 1,339.38 2,764.68 $1,135,000.00 $1,130,440.91 • • EXHIBIT C ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM SHEET 1 OF 2 Filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach this day of 200_ Elaine Doerfling City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach Reference is hereby made to the Assessor mops of the County of Los Angeles for a description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW UNDERGROUNDING) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA An assessment was levied by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach on the lots, pieces, and parcels of land shown on this assessment diagram. Said assessment was levied on the _th day of 200 . Said assessment diagram and the assessment roll were recorded in the office of the City Clerk of Hermosa Beach on the day of 200 Reference is made to the assessment roll recorded in the office of the Hermosa Beach City Clerk for the exact amount of each assessment levied against each parcel of land shown on this assessment diagram. Elaine Doerfling City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach Prepared by David Taussig & Associates. Inc, Filed this day of 200_, at the hour of o'clock _m, in Book of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page and as Instrument No. in the office of the County Recorder in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. Conny B. McCormack Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk, County of Los Angeles By Deputy Fee Exempt recording requested, per CA Government Code §6103 z JequrnN lueuJssessy -< 0 0 0 g Z C o 3 LLA 0' 0 > N LON 0 1 > CI w 0 0 r V J rn z and 4187-006-010 4187-006-009 4187-006-011 P 0 4187-006-012 4187-006-008 - 4187-006 .014 N O 4187-006-007 co 4187-006.006 w N 4187-006-005 - p q 4187-006-004 •per p, Q . S 4' 7g 4187-006 -013 0- 4187-006-015 r 4187-006-028 0- 4187-006-017 rd 4187-006-003 4187-006-027 4187-006-020 co co 4187-006-021 10TH CO U 4187-007-031 CO 4187-007-030 4187-006-023 N 4187-006-024 r 4187-007-001 4187-007-002 0' 4187-007-003 ' 4187-007.004 m NVflVHNVW 4187-009-038 u 4187-009-037 V L' 4187-009-036 m 4187-009-012 to o �C 4187.009-011 % y��rl W '9 4I87.009-030 4187-009-008 r 4187-009-007 0• r 4187-009-006 r 4187-009-005 c" r 4187-009-004 •0 r 4187-009-001 ST. 4187-008-056 0'N 4187-008-057 p, 4187-008-058 4187-008-059 VLn m O O N 0 rto 060-600-L816 19 4187-009-041 r 4187-009-042 01 4187-009-043 P 4187-009-044 4187-009-045 4187-009-048 0' 4187.009-049 ,0 4187-009.050 4187-009.046 4187-009-013 w 4187-009-014 4187-009-034 r 4187-009-035 01 4187-009-017 0' 4187-009-018 V 4187-009-052 m 4187-009-053 ,p 4187-009-020 c> 4187-009-064 4187-009-065 N 4187-009-022 c+' N 4187-009-023 r 4187-009-029 0' 4187-009-055 4187-009-056 4187-009-057 4187-009-058 4187-009-059 4187-009-060 4187-009-061 4187-009-062 a m N u N u u w 01 4187-008 -002 4187-008 001 cr r 0 H co r zAoz± HS ocD •+J '1] m aa����yyyy /w m ILCCC+7]] tmi 1001 W‘IJOn3000 -rad. a�xzN o N 4. "t , • Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council January 3, 2005 Regular Meeting of January 11, 2005 PROPOSED BAY VIEW DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2, REVIEW PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS, TABULATION OF BALLOTS Purpose: This report recommends that City Council hear and consider all comments and protests relating to the proposed proceedings such as: • The improvements proposed to be constructed and installed, • The extent of the Assessment District, • The estimate of costs and expenses, • The proposed Diagram of Assessment, • To consider and finally determine whether the public interest and convenience require the improvements, Following the receipt of any comments or protests and the receipt of any additional ballots, it is suggested that the City Council close the public comment portion of this hearing and recess so that staff can tabulate the ballots. Once the tabulation has been completed the City Council will reconvene and hear the results of the ballots. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAKING DETERMINATIONS, CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEEDINGS, AND ORDERING THE ACQUISITION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, DESIGNATING THE CITY TREASURER TO COLLECT AND RECEIVE ASSESSMENTS AND TO ESTABLISH A SPECIAL FUND FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE). Analysis: During the public hearing, the City Council shall consider all evidence for and protests against the proposed assessment and shall tabulate the ballots. The City Council shall not impose an assessment if there is a majority protest. A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the hearing, (1) there is a majority protest as set forth in Section 2930 of the Streets and Highways Code (the 1931 Act) or (2) ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots shall be weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. 5a • S • • After the approval and confirmation of the District, the Assessment Diagram and Notice of Assessment will be recorded at the County of Los Angeles. In addition, the Notice of Assessment with instructions for payment will be mailed to each property owner. Property owners will have the option to pay for their assessment costs in full within the 30 -day cash payment period following the approval of the district. Fiscal Impact: All construction costs and incidental expenses such as engineering design, contract administration and inspection, special bond counsel, bond servicing, and bond discount/special reserve fund will be repaid by an assessment to the property owners -, within the District. The total amount to be funded is $1,135,000.00. Attachments:1. Resolution of the City Council making determinations 2. Notice of Recordation 3. Certificate of City Clerk as to results of balloting 4. Affidavit of mailing notice 5. Southern California Edison Agreement 6. Verizon Agreement Respectfully submitted, Frank J. Senteno Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: 41011" Richard D. ligan, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Stell City anager F:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\BAYVIEW UUD 01-11-05.doc RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAKING DETERMINATIONS, CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEEDINGS, AND ORDERING THE ACQUISITION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, DESIGNATING THE CITY TREASURER TO COLLECT AND RECEIVE ASSESSMENTS AND TO ESTABLISH A SPECIAL FUND FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore adopted Resolution No. 04-6368 (the "Resolution of Intention") declaring its intention to order the acquisition and construction of the improvements described in the Resolution of Intention (the "Improvements") and to form Assessment District No. 2004-2 (Bay View Drive) (the "Assessment District") under the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code, "the Act"); and WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore approved a report prepared by David Taussig & Associates., Inc. (the "Assessment Engineer") under and pursuant to the Act and, in particular, Section 10204 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Engineer's Report"); and WHEREAS, this City Council fixed January 11, 2005, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. at the regular meeting place of the City, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California, as the time and place of hearing protests and objections to the improvements proposed in the Engineer's Report to be made, the extent of the Assessment District proposed to be created, and/or to the proposed assessment; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has caused notice to be given of the passage of the Resolution of Intention, the filing of the Engineer's Report and the time and place and purpose of said hearing, all as required by the Act and by Section 53753(c) of the California Government Code and Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution ("Article XIIID"); and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has filed with this City Council an affidavit of the Assessment Engineer setting forth the time and manner of the compliance with the requirements of the Act for mailing of said notice; and ATTACHMENT 1 • WHEREAS, a final Engineer's Report (the "Final Report") has been prepared setting forth the Improvements to be acquired and constructed and the adjusted assessments, if any, and the Final Report has been filed with the City Council and has been available for review by the property owners within the proposed Assessment District; and WHEREAS, on January 11, 2005 at the time and place stated in the aforesaid notice, a hearing was duly held by this City Council and, during the course of said hearing, the Final Report was duly presented and considered, all written protests and objections received, if any, were duly presented, read, heard and considered and all persons appearing at said hearing and desiring to be heard in the matter of said Final Report were heard, and a full, fair and complete hearing has been conducted; and WHEREAS, this City Council has received all ballots filed with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing, and the Assessment Engineer on behalf of the City Clerk has counted all ballots for and against the formation of the Assessment District as provided in Article XIIID; and WHEREAS, this City Council has considered the assessment proposed in the Final Report and the evidence presented at said hearing; and WHEREAS, it appears that the City Treasurer is covered by a blanket fidelity bond covering the faithful performance of the duties imposed by law in an amount deemed by this City Council to be adequate; and WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 10424 of the California Streets and Highways Code, funds collected by the City Treasurer pursuant to an assessment under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 are required to be placed in a special improvement fund designated by the name of the assessment proceeding; and WHEREAS, there has been presented to this City Council an agreement with Southern California Edison (the "Edison Agreement") meeting the requirements of Section 5896.9 of the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, there has been presented to this City Council an agreement with Verizon (the "Verizon Agreement") meeting the requirements of Section 5896.9 of the Streets and Highways Code; 2 • NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER as follows: SECTION 1. The public hearing referred to in the recitals hereof has been duly held, and each and every step in the proceedings prior to and including the hearing has been duly and regularly taken. This City Council is satisfied with the correctness of the Final Report, including the assessment and diagram and the maximum annual assessment for administrative expenses, the proceedings and all matters relating thereto. SECTION 2. The property within the Assessment District to be assessed as shown in the Final Report will be benefited by the Improvements. SECTION 3. This City Council overrules and denies any and all protests, objections and appeals made in regard to these proceedings. The City Council further finds and determines that a majority of the ballots received are in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots were weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. SECTION 4. This City Council orders the proposed Improvements to be acquired and constructed in accordance with the Final Report and these proceedings. SECTION 5. The amount of the assessments shown in the Final Report and the proposed maximum annual assessment per parcel for administrative expenses shown are confirmed and are fixed in said amounts. SECTION 6. The amounts to be assessed against the individual parcels shown on the assessment diagram contained in the Final Report are hereby approved and confirmed; and the City Council is authorized and directed to endorse the fact and date of such approval on the Final Report. SECTION 7. The assessment diagram and assessment is to be placed on file in the office of the Superintendent of Streets, and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to record, or cause to be recorded, the assessment diagram and assessment in the office of the County Recorder as required by Sections 3114, 10401 and 10402 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and the City Clerk shall record, or cause to be recorded, a Notice of Assessment as required by Section 3114 of said Code. 3 • • SECTION 8. The Superintendent of Streets is authorized and directed to give notice of the recordation of the assessment, as provided in Section 10404 of said Code. SECTION 9. The City Treasurer is designated to receive the assessments paid during the 30 day cash payment period which shall commence on the date of recording the assessment diagram with the County Recorder. SECTION 10. The Edison Agreement and Verizon Agreement are approved and the City Manager is authorized on behalf of the City to execute the Edison Agreement and Verizon Agreement. SECTION 11. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. ATTEST: City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach 4 • • I, , City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach held on the 11`h day of January, 2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach 5 I, as follows: CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE , City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby certify The foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at an adjourned meeting of the City Council of said City duly and regularly and legally held at the regular meeting place of the City on January 11, 2005, of which meeting all of the members of said City Council had due notice and at which a majority thereof were present. At said meeting said resolution was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers: Noes: Councilmembers: Absent: Councilmembers: I have carefully compared the same with the original minutes of said meeting on file and of record in my office, and the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted at said meeting and entered in said minutes. Said resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded since the date of its adoption, and same is now in full force and effect. Dated: January 11, 2005 (Seal) City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach 6 • • NOTICE OF RECORDATION OF ASSESSMENT, STATEMENT OF AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENT AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) Pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code), NOTICE IS GIVEN that an assessment on the property described in the material attached to this notice was recorded in the office of the Superintendent of Streets of the City of Hermosa Beach, on the day of January, 2005 and on said date the assessment and diagram was recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, County of Los Angeles, Book _ of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page . The The assessment can be paid by the owner of the property in cash on or before 5:00 p.m. on February _, 2005 in full satisfaction of the assessment. If the assessment is paid in cash on or before February _, 2005, the amount of your assessment.will be reduced by %. THE AMOUNT OF YOUR ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPERTY IS DESCRIBED ON THE ADDENDUM ATTACHED HERETO. PLEASE MAKE PAYMENT OR MAIL CHECK FOR ASSESSMENT TO: City of Hermosa Beach c/o City Treasurer 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 IF ASSESSMENTS ARE NOT PAID ON OR BEFORE 5:00 p.m. on 2005 bonds will thereafter be issued upon the unpaid assessments in accordance with the provisions of the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 and Resolution No. 04-6368, the Resolution of Intention. NOTICE NO PAYMENTS ACCEPTED WITHOUT THIS STATEMENT. THIS STATEMENT MUST BE PRESENTED ON PAYMENT. IF YOU ARE NOT THE OWNER OF THIS PROPERTY, PLEASE NOTIFY US OR FORWARD THIS STATEMENT TO THE PRESENT OWNER. Dated: , 2004 Superintendent of Streets ATTCHMENT 2 Owner's Name • • ADDENDUM Address 2 Assessment Assessment Parcel Amount • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) LIMITED OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS SERIES 2005 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK AS TO THE RESULTS OF BALLOTING I, Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, do hereby certify that I have examined the Official Ballots returned to the City on or before the close of the public hearing of the City Council on January 11, 2005 with respect to the authorization to levy an assessment on property in City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 (Bay View Drive) (the "Proposition"). I further certify that a weighted majority of the ballots were in favor of the Proposition ( for, against). In tabulating the ballots, the ballots were weighted by the Assessment Engineer according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. Copies of the executed ballots are on file with the City Clerk. Dated this 11`h day of January, 2005. Elaine Doerfling City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTACHMENT 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) LIMITED OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS SERIES 2005 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK AS TO THE RESULTS OF BALLOTING I, Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, do hereby certify that I have examined the Official Ballots returned to the City on or before the close of the public hearing of the City Council on January 11, 2005 with respect to the authorization to levy an assessment on property in City of Hermosa Beach Assessment District No. 2004-2 (Bay View Drive) (the "Proposition"). I further certify that a weighted majority of the ballots were against the Proposition ( for, against). In tabulating the ballots, the ballots were weighted by the Assessment Engineer according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. Copies of the executed ballots are on file with the City Clerk. Dated this 11`h day of January, 2005. Elaine Doerfling City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTACHMENT 3 • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE OF HEARING AND NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION OF INTENTION AND OF FILING OF MAP OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) The undersigned declares as follows: I am now and at all times hereinafter mentioned the employee of David Taussig & Associates, Inc., the Engineer of Work for Assessment District No. 2004-2 (Bay View Drive). On behalf of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, I mailed, or caused to be mailed, postage prepaid, a notice of the City Council adoption of the Resolution of Intention applicable to the above - captioned Assessment District to all persons owning real property which is proposed to be assessed to pay any part of the cost of the work described in said resolution, whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized assessment roll used for the assessment and collection of general ad valorem taxes or on the State Board of Equalization assessment roll at the addresses shown thereon, or as known to me. Said mailing was completed prior to November 26, 2004, and a copy of said notice of adoption as so mailed is attached hereto and made a part hereof. On the original and one copy of the map of said Assessment District heretofore approved by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, the City Clerk endorsed her certificate evidencing the date and adoption of the resolution describing the proposed boundaries of said Assessment District and that the original of said map was filed in the office of the City Clerk. I further declare that I caused a copy of said map to be filed with the County Recorder of the County of Los Angeles on , 2004 in Book _ of Maps of Assessment and County Facilities Districts at Page . Ideclare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. DATED: , 2004 DAVID TAUSSIG & ASSOCIATES, INC. By: ATTACHMENT 4 f • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AD 2004-2 BALLOT TABULATION IN FAVOR $497,866.60 OPPOSED $404,182.47 TOTAL $902,049.07 % IN FAVOR % OPPOSED 55.19% 44.81 % CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AD 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) ASSESSMENT ROLL VOTE WEIGHTING YES NO APN ASSESSMENT NUMBER STREET ADDRESS FRONTAGE UNADJUSTED TOTAL STREETSCAPE BENEFIT UTILITY BENEFIT GROSS I CREDIT I NET GROSS I CREDIT I NET ADJUSTED TOTAL AS PRELIMINARY APPROVED AS CONFIRMED NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-006-003 84 N $0.00 $12,266.60 4187-006-004 83 NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-006-005 82 N $0.00 $12,266.60 4187-006-006 81 NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-006-007 80 NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-006-008 79 N $0.00 $12,266.60 4187-006-009 78 N $0.00 $16,590.58 4187-006-010 77 N $0.00 $25,228.31 4187-006-011 59 N $0.00 $20,444.34 4187-006-012 60 N $0.00 $3,066.65 4187-006-013 61 Y $9,199.95 $0.00 4187-006-014 62 Y $16,355.47 $0.00 4187-006-015 63 NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-006-017 65 1NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-006-018 66 Y $12,266.60 $0.00 4187-006-019 67 N $0.00 $16,355.47 4187-006-020 68 'NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-006-021 69 Y $16,355.47 $0.00 4187-006-023 72 N $0.00 $16,355.47 4187-006-024 73 Y $4,088.87 $0.00 4187-006-025 70 Y $12,266.60 $0.00 4187-006-026 71 N $0.00 $36,799.80 4187-006-027 85 Y $16,355.47 $0.00 4187-006-028 64 N $0.00 $24,533.20 4187-007-001 74 N $0.00 $12,266.60 4187-007-002 75 N $0.00 $9,199.95 4187-007-003 76 Y $6,133.30 $0.00 4187-007-004 88 !NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-007-030 87 N $0.00 $28,352.20 4187-007-031 86 !NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-008-001 34 Y $8,433.29 $0.00 4187-008-002 35 N $0.00 $2,813.14 4187-008-056 55 NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-008-057 56 NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-008-058 57 NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-008-059 58 Y $16,355 47 $0.00 4187-009-001 54 N $0.00 $16,355.47 4187-009-004 49 N $0.00 $16,355.47 4187-009-005 48 Y $16,355.47 $0.00 4187-009-006 47 NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-009-007 46 NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-009-008 45 N $0.00 $16,355.47 4187-009-011 40 N $0.00 $16,355.47 4187-009-012 39 Y $15,128.81 $0.00 4187-009-013 12 Y $17,582.13 $0.00 4187-009-014 13 Y $11,898.60 $0.00 4187-009-017 16 Y $11,898.60 $0.00 4187-009-018 17 Y $11,898.60 $0.00 4187-009-020 20 Y $11,898.60 $0.00 4187-009-022 23 Y $11,898.60 $0.00 4187-009-023 24 Y $11,898.60 $0.00 4187-009-024 25 NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-009-026 51 NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-009-027 50 N $0.00 $12,266.60 4187-009-028 41 N $0.00 $4,088.87 4187-009-029 42 N $0.00 $12,266.60 4187-009-030 43 N $0.00 $4,088.87 4187-009-031 44 N $0.00 $12,266.60 4187-009-032 52 NO BALLOT] $0.00 $0.00 4187-009-033 53 NO BALLOT $0.00 $0.00 4187-009-034 14 Y J $11,898.60 $0.00 4187-009-035 15 1034 HERMOSA AVE 1042 HERMOSA AVE 1106 HERMOSA AVE 1110 HERMOSA AVE 1120 HERMOSA AVE 1128 HERMOSA AVE 1140 HERMOSA AVE 1144 HERMOSA AVE 1131 MANHATTAN AVE 1130 PALM DR 1125 MANHATTAN AVE 1128 PALM DR 0 1106 PALM DR 1045 MANHATTAN AVE 1046 PALM DR 1035 MANHATTAN AVE 1025 MANHATTAN AVE 1011 MANHATTAN AVE 131 10TH ST . 1021 MANHATTAN AVE 1020 PALM DR 1014 HERMOSA AVE 1109 MANHATTAN AVE 150 10TH ST 931 MANHATTAN AVE 928 PALM DR 921 MANHATTAN AVE 934 HERMOSA AVE 950 HERMOSA AVE 947 MONTEREY BLVD 226 10TH ST 214 10TH ST 210 10TH ST 220 10TH ST 216 10TH ST 1002 MANHATTAN AVE 1028 MANHATTAN AVE 1040 MANHATTAN AVE 1048 MANHATTAN AVE 1102 MANHATTAN AVE 1112 MANHATTAN AVE 1138 MANHATTAN AVE 1142 MANHATTAN AVE 1101 MONTEREY BLVD 1085 MONTEREY BLVD 1068 BAYVIEW DR 1057 MONTEREY BLVD 1047 MONTEREY BLVD 1035 MONTEREY BLVD 1027 MONTEREY BLVD 1021 MONTEREY BLVD 1022 MANHATTAN AVE 1021 BAYVIEW DR 1126 MANHATTAN AVE 1126 MANHATTAN AVE 1121 BAYVIEW DR 1120 MANHATTAN AVE IOl1 BAYVIEW DR 1012 MANHATTAN AVE 1075 MONTEREY BLVD 1069 MONTEREY BLVD 80.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 54.10 61.70 50.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 120.00 40.00 60.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 80.66 69.34 42.50 55.00 13.75 13.75 13.75 13.75 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 4000 40.00 40.00 37.00 43.00 29.09 29.09 29.09 29.09 29.09 29.09 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 29.10 29.09 40.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 27.05 30.85 25.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 60.00 20.00 30.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 40.33 34.67 21.25 27.50 6.88 6.88 6.88 6.88 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.50 21.50 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 14.55 14.55 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 (100.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (50.00%) (100.00%) (55.79%) 0.00% (100.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% (100.00%) 0.00% 0.00% 40.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 27.05 30.85 25.00 0.00 15,00 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 60.00 20.00 30.00 15.00 7.50 0.00 17.83 34.67 0.00 13.75 3.44 3.44 3.44 3.44 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.50 21.50 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 0.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 14.55 14.55 40.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 27.05 30.85 2500 7.50 7.50 20.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 60.00 20.00 30.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 40.33 34.67 10.63 13.75 6.88 6.88 6.88 6.88 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.50 21.50 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 1000 10.00 10.00 10.00 14.55 14.55 (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (50.00%) 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) (50.00%) 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 20.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.53 30.85 25.00 7.50 7.50 20.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 30.00 20.00 30.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 40.33 34.67 10.63 6.88 3.44 3.44 3.44 3.44 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 2000 20.00 18.50 21.50 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 14.55 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 14.55 14.55 60.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 40.58 61.70 50.00 7.50 22.50 40.00 40.00 10.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 10.00 30.00 90.00 40.00 60.00 30.00 22.50 15.00 58.16 69.34 10.63 20.63 6.88 6.88 6.88 6.88 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 37.00 43.00 29.10 29.10 29.10 29.10 29.10 29.10 10.00 30.00 30.00 10.00 30.00 10.00 30.00 10.00 29.10 29.10 $24,533.20 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $ 12,266.60 $12,266.60 $16,590.58 $25,228.31 $20,444.34 $3,066.65 $9,199.95 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 $36,799.80 $16,355.47 $24,533.20 $12,266.60 $9,199.95 $6,133.30 $23,780.85 $28,352.20 $4,346.47 $8,433.29 $2,813.14 $2,813.14 $2,813.14 $2,813.14 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $15,128.81 $17,582.13 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $ 11,898.60 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 $4,088.87 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $24,533.20 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $16,590.58 $25,228.31 $20,444.34 $3,066.65 $9,199.95 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 S16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 $36,799.80 $16,355.47 $24,533.20 $12,266.60 $9,199.95 $6,133.30 $23,780.85 $28,352.20 $4,346.47 $8,433.29 $2,813.14 $2,813.14 $2,813.14 $2,813.14 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 SI 5,128.81 $17,582.13 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 $12,266.60 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 $4,088.87 $12,266.60 $4,088.87 $11,898.60 $11,898.60 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AD 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) ASSESSMENT ROLL VOTE WEIGHTING YES NO APN ASSESSMENT NUMBER STREET ADDRESS FRONTAGE UNADJUSTED TOTAL STREETSCAPE BENEFIT UTH,ITY BENEFIT GROSS 1 CREDIT 1 NET GROSS 1 CREDIT 1 NET ADJUSTED TOTAL AS PRELIMINARY APPROVED AS CONFIRMED Y N Y Y NO BALLO Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y NO BALLO Y Y Y Y NO BALLO NO BALLO NO BALLO NO BALLO $16,355.47 $0.00 $96,088.38 $13,677.26 $0.00 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $16,355.47 $0.00 $0.00 $5,454.56 $5,454.56 $5,454.56 $5,953.39 $5,953.39 $5,577.21 $0.00 $5,577.21 $5,577.21 $5,577.21 $5,577.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4187-009-036 $12,266.60 4187-009-037 $0.00 4187-009-038 $0.00 4187-009-039 $0.00 4187-009-040 $0.00 4187-009-041 90.00 4187-009-042 $0.00 4187-009-043 $0.00 4187-009-044 $16,355.47 4187-009-045 $16,355.47 4187-009-046 $0.00 4187-009-048 $0.00 4187-009-049 $0.00 4187-009-050 $0.00 4187-009-052 $0.00 4187-009-053 $0.00 4187-009-055 $0.00 4187-009-056 $0.00 4187-009-057 $0.00 4187-009-058 $0.00 4187-009-059 $0.00 4187-009-060 $0.00 4187-009-061 $0.00 4187-009-062 $0.00 4187-009-064 $0.00 4187-009-065 TOTAL 38 1150 MANHATTAN AVE 37 1158 MANHATTAN AVE 36 200 PIER AVE 2 238 PIER AVE 1 240 PIER AVE 3 1221 MONTEREY BLVD 4 1215 MONTEREY BLVD 5 1201 MONTEREY BLVD 6 1137 MONTEREY BLVD 7 1123 MONTEREY BLVD 11 1103 MONTEREY BLVD 8 1111 MONTEREY BLVD 9 1113 MONTEREY BLVD 10 1115 MONTEREY BLVD 18 1051 MONTEREY BLVD 19 1052 BAYVIEW DR 26 1019 MONTEREY BLVD 27 1017 MONTEREY BLVD 28 1015 MONTEREY BLVD 29 1013 MONTEREY BLVD 30 1011 MONTEREY BLVD 31 1009 MONTEREY BLVD 32 1007 MONTEREY BLVD 33 1005 MONTEREY BLVD 21 1041 MONTEREY BLVD 22 1042 BAYVIEW DR 40.00 30.00 235.00 44.60 44.60 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 13.33 13.33 13.33 14.55 14.55 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 14.55 14.55 3,352.54 20.00 0.00% 15.00 0.00% 117.50 0.00% 22.30 0.00% 22.30 (100.00%) 20.00 0.00% 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 6.67 6.67 6.67 7.28 7.28 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 7.28 7.28 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 20.00 15.00 117.50 22.30 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 6.67 6.67 6.67 7.28 7.28 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 7.28 7.28 20.00 15.00 117.50 11.15 11.15 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 6.67 6.67 6.67 7.28 7.28 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 7.28 7.28 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.003 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 20.00 15.00 117.50 11.15 11.15 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 6.67 6.67 6.67 7.28 7.28 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 6.82 7.28 0.00% 7.28 1,350.53 40.00 30.00 235.00 33.45 11.15 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 13.34 13.34 13.34 14.56 14.56 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 14.56 14.56 2,775.83 516,355.47 912,266.60 996,088.38 S 13,677.26 94,559.09 S16,355.47 S 16,355.47 916,355.47 916,355.47 916,355.47 $16,355.47 55,454.56 95,454.56 95,454.56 55,953.39 $5,953.39 95,577.21 55,577.21 95,577.21 95,577.21 95,577.21 95,577.21 95,577.21 95,577.21 95,953.39 95,953.39 $1,135,000.00 $16,355.47 912,266.60 996,088.38 913,677.26 90.00 916,355.47 516,355.47 916,355.47 916,355.47 916,355.47 916,355.47 95,454.56 55,454.56 55,454.56 55,953.39 55,953.39 55,577.21 55,577.21 95,577.21 55,577.21 95,577.21 95,577.21 95,577.21 95,577.21 95,953.39 95,953.39 $1,130,440.91 • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2004-2 (BAY VIEW DRIVE) INSTRUCTIONS FOR HEARING HEARING JANUARY 11, 2005 1. Mayor announces: "It's 7:30 p.m., this is the time and place fixed for the 1913 Act Assessment Hearing of Protests, Objections or Appeals with respect to the Bay View Underground Utility District assessment pursuant to Resolution of Intention, Resolution No. 04-6368." 2. City Clerk presents Affidavit of Mailing Notice of Hearing filed with the City Clerk. 3. Mayor calls upon the Assessment Engineer to present the final 1913 Act Report and to explain the proposed boundaries of the assessment district, the nature of the work, a general statement that all property within the assessment district will be benefited. 4. City Clerk to read or summarize the written protests received. 5. Mayor announces that the City Council will hear "any person or his or her representative who wishes to protest the proceedings or who are in favor of the proceedings?" (Hear all persons responding.) 6. Mayor calls upon the Assessment Engineer to make a statement regarding the benefit of each property where the owner has made a protest if the Assessment Engineer has not responded to the protestants during the course of the hearing. The Mayor shall ask if anyone who has not done so desires to submit his/her ballot to the City Clerk. 7. If all persons have been heard and there are no other persons present indicating a desire to be heard, the City Council may adjourn the hearing to another date if the City Council needs more information. If there are any changes in the proceedings which would increase any persons assessment or add property to the assessment district a new hearing must be held on those questions. 8. At the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may wish to recess the hearing to allow the City Clerk to count the votes. When the votes are counted the City Clerk will inform the City Council of the votes received in favor and against the assessment district. A majority protest (by weighted votes) is necessary to abandon the District formation proceedings. If there is no need for an adjourned hearing the City Council will then close the hearing by motion and voice vote. If there is an equal number or greater number of votes in favor as opposed then the following action should be taken: Adopt the resolution confirming assessments and designating the City Treasurer to collect assessments. NOTES 1. The minutes should show the names and addresses of all protestants, including a very brief resume of oral objections. 2. After the confirmation of the assessment by the City Council, (i) the City Clerk, and (ii) Superintendent of Streets should sign the assessment diagram and date it January 12, 2005, January 13, 2005 or January 14, 2005, if it is not convenient to record the assessment diagram in the office of the County Recorder on January 12, 2005. On the same date, the Superintendent of Streets will record the diagram and assessment in his office. Appropriate entries will be found on the assessment diagram to indicate recordation. 3. On the same date as the filing in the office of the Superintendent of Streets, the City Clerk or the Assessment Engineer on behalf of the City Clerk files a copy of the assessment and diagram in the office of the County Recorder. 4. On the same date, the City Clerk or the Assessment Engineer on behalf of the City Clerk executes and records in the office of the County Recorder the Notice of Assessment with the names of the assessed owners as they appear on the latest secured assessment roll attached thereto. 5. City Clerk or the Assessment Engineer completes the affidavit of recording and sends a copy to Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth. 2 H:\B95\PWFILES\UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICTS\BAYVIEW\Bay View Instructions for Hearing 1-11-05.DOC SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® An EDISON INTERNATIONAL® Company • November 16, 2004 STEPHEN BURRELL CITY OF HERMOSA BCH. 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA Subject: SCE Project Number: 6444-7195, 27103 Project location: BpYVIEW/PALM HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Thank you forati the opportunity to assist you with your electrical needs. the directions so that your project The information provided below indicates requirements needed to complete your project. Please read and follow may be completed in a timely manner. of the invoice o Enclosed are two copies �f our invoice. Return one copy with your payment o Please return all applications and/or agreements fully completed. o An Edison Inspector must approve all underground systems. Call (310)783-9352 prior to construction. a ent in the enclosed self-addressed Please return the documents and/or pa documents, your project will be envelope. After receipt of the requiredquestions, feel free to scheduled for construction. If you have any q call me at (310)783-9303. Sincerely, TOMMY CROSS Customer Service Planner Enclosures ATTACHMENT 5 1924 Cashdan St Compton, CA 90220 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON' An EDISON INTERNATIONAL® Company • • November 16, 2004 SALES INVOICE NAME: CITY OF HERMOSA BCH. PROJECT LOCATION: HERMOSA/PALM BEACH, CA 90254 PLEASE MAIL PAYMENT TO: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ATTN: TOMMY CROSS 505 MAPLE AVE TORRANCE, CA 90503 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2-7103-INSTB.LCUUGT FAILTC OONCONVERT TO UG PER RULE 20 All prices are applicable for a period of 90 days from this date and are subject to change thereafter. CUSTOMER INVOICE INFORMATION SCE ACCOUNTING Cust Adv Non -Ref - No ITCC NON-REFUNDABLE : 142.110 = $ 420,633.00 Relocation Advance $ 420,633.00 . TOTAL = $ 420,633.00 . LESS ADVANCE $ 30,000.00 . PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT $ 390,633.00 . 1924 Cashdan St ti Compton, CA 90220 : LESS ADVANCE : TOTAL $ 30,000.00 $ 390,633.00 : SCE PROJECT NUMBER: : 6444-7195, 27103 : C.W.O.# C.J.O.# : Name: CITY OF HERMOSA BCH. : Prj Loc BAYVIEW/PALM HERMOSA BEACH, CA 9025 • . AGREEMENT FOR REPLACEMENT'. OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES (Installation by Utility) THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of •10 between SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, a corporation, hereinafter called "Utility", and the party or parties whose names are subscribed hereunder as "Applicants", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Applicants have requested Utility, pursuant to Section B. of Utility's Rule No. 20, Replacement of Overhead with Underground Distribution Facilities, to replace Utility's existing overhead with underground distribution facilities at the location or locations in the County of T,r G An cge 1 e s , State of California, substantially described as follows: Bayview Drive and Palm Drive between Pier Avenue and 10th Street City of Hermosa Beach and as shown on the map attached hereto and made a part hereof; and -WHEREAS , a. It is necessary for all property owners served from Utility's overhead facilities to be removed to agree in writing to perform the wiring changes on owners' premises so that service may be furnished from Utility's underground distribution system in accordance with Utility's rules and that Utility may discontinue Utility's overhead service upon completion of Utility's underground facilities, or b. Suitable legislation is in effect requiring such property owners to make such necessary wiring changes and authorizing Utility to discontinue Utility's overhead service; and WHEREAS, Applicants have requested Utility to furnish and install the pads and vaults for transformers and associated equipment, conduits, ducts, boxes, and electrolier bases and to perform other work related to structures and substructures including breaking of pavement, trenching, backfilling, and repaving required in connection with installation of the underground system; and WHEREAS, Underground service connections to each applicant from Utility's underground distribution system will be installed and maintained as provided in Utility's rules applicable thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and of the mutual promises and covenants of the parties hereto, hereinafter contained, it is mutually agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows, viz.: I. Applicants will pay to Utility concurrently with the execution hereof the nonrefundable amount of $ 192,188.70 , which is the excess, if any, of the estimated costs, including breaking of pavement, trenching, backfilling, and paving required in connection with installation of the underground system, and of S 228,444.30 , the excess, if any, of the estimated costs including transformers, meters, and services, of completing the underground system and building a new equivalent overhead system. The amount contributed by each of said Applicants is shown hereinafter. 2. Utility will complete the undergrounding of said overhead distribution facilities, provided, however, Utility has been granted rights of way therefor satisfactory to and without cost to Utility. SCE CSO 156-1 REV 11101 Penton an rIcycnod pease • • 3. Said underground distribution facilities will be and will remain the property of Utility. 4. Applicants each agree Applicants will perform necessary wiring changes on Applicants' premises so that service may be furnished from Utility's underground distribution system in accordance with Utility's rules, and Utility may discontinue Utility's overhead service upon completion of Utility's underground facilities. 5. This contract is subject to the Rules of Utility. 6. This contract shall at all times be subject to such changes or modifications by the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California as said Commission may, from time to time, direct in the exercise of its jurisdiction. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day and year first above written. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANTS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY By South Bay REGION OR DIVISION MANAGER REGION OR DIVISION AMOUNT ADDRESS CONTRIBUTED TOTAL .•$ 420,633:00 Witness Address 6444-7195, 2-7103 6044-7102, 3-7102 156-1 —2— • 0 S P ENGINEERING November 15, 2004 City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90250 verizop 2819 W. 182nd Street, CAYO6NC Redondo Beach, CA 90278 Reference: Under grounding District Bayview and Palm / Pier Ave. to Tenth St. Verizon Work Order 874-8P001 KD Attn: Stephen Burrell The estimated cost of the work you have requested from Verizon California Inc. is $408,051.41. As stated, this figure is an estimate and only covers the costs to relocate Verizon facilities. Any other utilities occupying the poles may separately request reimbursement from you for their expenses. (This sentence is included for pole work only). Your agreement with Verizon is to pay for the actual cost of the work, which may be greater or less than the estimated cost listed above. If the actual cost is greater than the estimated cost, you will be billed the additional charges. If the actual cost is Tess than the estimated cost, you will receive a refund. In accordance with Verizon Calif. Inc. and the Cal. PUC No. RULE 40 governing the recovery from customers of the actual costs of facility rearrangements, I am required to collect the full amount of the estimated cost of your work in advance before any work can begin. During our performance of the requested work, an additional advance payment could be required should you alter the scope of work, take other action which would cause us to incur additional costs, or if we encounter unforeseen events or obstructions. If you agree to these terms, please sign below as accepted and forward this signed letter of agreement along with a check for $408,051.41 made payable to Verizon California Inc. to the address above. Upon receipt of your signed agreement and check I will complete your work order and release it to our Construction Department for scheduling. Verizon will attempt to complete the work for which it is responsible under this agreement within 90 days after receipt of payment and a fully executed copy of this agreement and attached agreements if applicable. However, no damages or other liability shall accrue against Verizon in favor of the Customer if the work is not completed within said period due to Verizon's action or the action of other utilities, agencies, or other companies, which may have become involved in this project. ATTACHMENT 6 Page 2 November 15, 2004 WO 874-8P001 KD The costs and engineering specifications will be null and void if this letter is not signed and returned within 30 days from this date or if customer requests a new engineering study. Any questions regarding the work can be directed to me at (310) 793-4186. /fri Michael Kenway Outside Plant Engineer 2819 W. 182nd Street Redondo Beach, CA 90278 ACCEPTED: DATE: ± - -- January 4, 2005 OAS Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of January 11, 2005 the Hermosa Beach City Council REDUCTION IN STREET LIGHTING CITYWIDE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Receive public comment concerning the reduction of street lighting in the test area north of 27th Street and west of Valley Drive and determine if this test should be terminated and lights turned back on or to leave lights off and continue this lighting reduction program citywide; and 2. Consider directing staff to begin the process of balloting residents for approval to increase their Lighting/Landscaping District assessment by an amount less than $10 per year. Summary: OPTION 1 — REDUCED STREET LIGHTING At its regularly scheduled meeting held on August 10, 2004, Council approved a test project to remove 50% of the streetlights within an area north of 27th Street and west of Valley Drive. This was undertaken as an option to balance the deficit in the Lighting /Landscaping District budget. With the help of the Council subcommittee (Reviczky and Tucker), the area was walked at night and 52 out of a total of 161lights were selected for elimination (a 32% reduction). See the attached area map showing all of the lights to remain and to be removed (Attachment 1). During the month of October, 2004, Edison turned off their lights and placed burlap bags over the luminaries and City maintenance personnel similarly turned off the City lights on Hermosa Avenue. Staff has received 29 letters in opposition to the light reduction and 4 letters in favor (Attachment 2). The main concerns expressed were that residents felt more vulnerable to crime and difficulties when walking at night. There are 680 properties in the test area. After reviewing the impacts of this test staff made the following findings: • It may be very difficult to achieve greater than a 25% reduction citywide. • Anticipated annual savings is between $50,000 to $60,000. This alone would not be enough to balance the District's budget. • While the number of residents complaining is a small percentage overall, the opponents have very strong feelings regarding personal safety issues that are difficult to appease. • Turning off streetlights is a very time consuming effort for staff in dealing with the unhappy residents. It is always possible to remove individual lights that residents consider un -necessary on a case-by-case basis. Staff suggests a policy requiring that a petition from the neighborhood affected be submitted with a super -majority in support of its removal. Glare shields are also available upon request for a $150 charge when an Edison light is involved. The actual cost savings from spot removals requested by residents would not remedy the budgetary needs of the District. Therefore, staff suggests the following option be considered for a long-term solution. OPTION 2 - INCREASED ASSESSMENTS FOR LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING DISTRICT If Council determines that turning off streetlights is not a desired option for balancing the District's budget, then another option to consider is increasing the assessment to property owners. The Lighting/Landscaping District is funded by a tax levy of $455,000 per year. The assessment amount to each dwelling unit is $41.45 per year. There is a total of 10,982 dwelling units in the city. This'assessment has not changed since FY 97-98, when park landscaping was eliminated from the District budget. The assessment prior to this was set at $54.82 per year in FY 95-96. The District's budget for FY 04-05 and 05-06 was balanced utilizing an estimated transfer of $141,738 from the General Fund. Staff has reviewed all expenditures charged to the District and determined that we could reduce personnel allocations in FY 05-06 so that the estimated fund balance on June 30, 2006 (including the General Fund transfer) will be approximately $1,000. After that the District will be running a deficit of approximately $100,000 per year, plus any cost increases in water and electric. It is recommended that ballot proceedings be held to approve an increase in the assessment amount for FY 05-06 by an amount less than $10 per year. This would create a fund balance at the end of FY 05-06 of approximately $100,000, which would cover the costs of assessment proceedings and balloting which is estimated to be $50,000 (mailing costs alone are over $20,000), plus provide a small contingency amount for unanticipated expenses. Under Proposition 218 guidelines, the new District may include an annual CPI adjustment, which will provide for future increases in the cost of utilities. The annual assessment is set based upon actual expenditures but the "allowable assessment amount", which includes the annual CPI adjustment, is tracked each year. When expenditures justify the need, you can increase the assessment up to this "allowable amount" without re -balloting. 2 With Council's approval, staff will bring back contracts for assessment engineering services to begin proceedings to increase assessments. The District is supposed to be self-sustaining, with the tax levy equaling expenditures. If residents vote down this increase in assessment, then staff would recommend revisiting the option of reduced services. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Resident correspondence packet Respectfully submitted, Richard :. Morgan, P.E. • Director of Public Works/City Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: Concur: Viki Copland S City Manager Finance Director 3 H:\695\PWFILES\CCITEMS\streetlighting reduction 1-11-05.doc 5.5I.4.1 I • ••.. LEGEND e SCE LIGHTS. (COUNT = 74) SCE LIGHTS TO BE REMOVED. (COUNT = 45) 0 CITY OWNED STREET LIGHTS. (COUNT = 35) ' CITY LIGHTS TO BE REMOVED, (COUNT = 7) • - CITY —BOUNDARY 'F';'t7t).;441`• parcels selection ne Litet12.2thns I 3.13 1300 211_22_112.1-13421,'' 234 • NOI 331•3 !le a" i 422 0 12. 3 ..... ii .. 45, .,. .. 442 or 42.1 414 410 —.- 00 NI NS 02 ,,. 427 412 4N T INGLESIDE OR au MORNINGSIDE DR 1.• jo 2.22 .A. .110 114 14I . en .. Jos NS 31111 320 ame in 333 in 31. 311 rTh NO 3111 In S.•-•1 Me —..- N1 NI /If NI 43, 433 00 02 421 • , 324 rA. Le, 3/0 —40 445• 232 IN p5• 75 f0 in 132 NM. 3423 3417 TRAND HERMOSA AVE .:. FOR ADDRESS AGAINST ADDRESS June Mikrut 230 35th St. Leona M. Anderson not provided Brigitte Avary 225 34th St. Nancy E. Wolf 244 29th St. Cheri Cusumann 401 29th St. Ria Deuerlein 236 34th St. Brad Smith 445 29th St. Ramanda C. Zaia 400 block 29th St. Jeffrey & Dee Jay Cooper 316 29th Ct. Sylvia Simmons 2111/2 32nd PI. Glen West 400 block 29th St. Bill Frishette* 426 29th St. C. L. Frishette* - 426 29th St. Norine Havard 30th St. & Manhattan Ave. Bernard Zaia 437 29th St. . Britt & Dolly Johnson. 321 28th St. Virginia Shaal not provided Brad Levin 434-436 29th St. Cindy & lan Logan 2804 Ingleside Dr. Anna Jung 35th Place Dinny Miller ' 29th St. Julie -Ann Forney not provided Todd Calish 650 10th St. - Concerned about Strand lighting being turned off. Michael Cassidy 20th St. - Concerned about Strand lighting being turned off but agrees should be tried in other areas... Ron Felsing 27th St. between Morningside & Manhattan Lee Hennis 2216 Monterey Blvd. Carrol Beals, David O'Leary 231 29th St. Gwen Reese 223 Valley Dr. Merle Jaque & Sarah Jaque 1954 Bay View Dr. Robert Shaal 263 Valley Dr. Aileen Martin 329 31st St. Elli & John Horne 409 Gould Ave. Milo Sutton 415 2nd Street TOTAL FOR 4 TOTAL AGAINST 29 *Individual emails H:\B95\PWFILES\street correspondence\streetlight for and against 12-29-04.doc • • From: Jackie Drasco on behalf of City Clerk Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 10:44 AM To: 'Brigitte Prince' Cc: Rhea Punneo; 'mflaherty@hermosabch.org' Subject: RE: street lights Thank you for contacting the City of Hermosa Beach regarding the street lighting. I am forwarding your email to our Public Works Department so they will know that you:; appreciate their work. Again, thank you for contacting the City and if you have any additional questions or if the City may be of assistance to you in the future, please let us know. Original Message From: Brigitte Prince(mailto:omaopaprince@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 3:41 PM To: City Clerk Subject: street lights I want to thank you for turning off the street light at 225-34 St. I now notice the evening stars and the neighborhood house lights.It gives a cosy feeling.Now I know what it must feel like to live in Palos Verdes Estates that does not have one street light to disturb the environment.The idea of turning off some of the lights also helps you save money for your electric bill that could be used elsewhere in the city budget --road and sewer repair --hope hope. Thanks again Brigitte Avary 08/30/2004 12:27 310372476 41 ikA-4 l3is itbAAem.4, 0,1f v t t(' 'iwPTA: stm44(.4/ P17 - CHARLES CUSUMANO PAGE 01/01• 71i- 4,2 ,/7 P,,u, z ov Ala& ticitia Page 1 of 3 Rick Morgan To: Brad Smith Subject: RE: street lights At this time, we are planning on un -bagging the Tight in front of 424 29th St but Ramanda informed me that this resident also liked the light off! I'm not sure what to do? Rick Original Message From: Brad Smith [mailto:bradsmith1964@adelphia.net) Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 11:37 AM To: Rick Morgan Subject: RE: street lights Rick, Update to our previous email exchange. I love it, others hate it, as you would expect. I did have a conversation with my neighbor (and friend) Ramanda Zaia in which she mentioned her conversation with you and here distress that both lights inside our block had been bagged. You confirmed with her that it was a mistake and that the light in front of 424? 29th Street was not to be bagged - ok with me since I'm at 445 29th Street but did want to make sure that at least for the duration of the experiment, that the light in front of 445 stay bagged. Please advise. I would like to explore shielding opportunities should the decision in January be to go back to all lights on. I've seen the shields used elsewhere and was not excited as they seemed too small and inadequate to direct light down in the street instead of through front windows. They seemed more designed for 2nd stories. I'd be happy to fashion something out of sheet metal if necessary. I did find it ironic that some of the justification Ramanda used for having the light on was that when her husband came home late, and the neighbor's porch light was not on, he found it hard to see since Ramanda has usually switched off their front light since it shines too much inside their house let me get this straight, you want to put a streetlight on that shines into my house because your own porch light shines inside your house - strange. I suggested (nicely) that Ramanda get a spot light and attach it to her front gate. Please confirm which light will stay bagged. Hope all is well, have a good day, Brad At 03:46 PM 8/26/2004, you wrote: That's great Brad. I'm not sure all your neighbors will agree with you but please give me an email after lights out to balance out some of those who will be upset...thanx...Rick Original Message From: Brad Smith [mai!to:bradsmith1964@adelphia.net] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 10:31 AM 11/17/2004 • To: Rick Morgan ` Subject: RE: street lights Thanks Rick, We do live in that area between Ingleside and Morningside and are in front of one of the mid -block lights. My dreams of BB guns, slingshots, paint brush's on a pole, climbing spikes, cherry pickers, rocks, chain saws and other assorted fantasy remedies are coming true. I don't know a single person who has a light in front of their house that doesn't dream of getting rid of it. Thanks again, Brad At 09:09 AM 8/26/2004, you wrote: Brad - It will take approximately 3 -months to start seeing lights out with bags in the first test area (27th St. north and Valley Dr. west). Are you between Ingleside and Momingside? If so, both midblock lights are proposed for removal...Rick Original Message From: Brad Smith [mailto:bradsmith1964 a.adelphia.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 4:48 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: street lights Rick Morgan, I'm sure I'm not the first to ask, but can the streetlight in front of my house at 445 29th Street be the first one turned off. I am so happy the city is doing this and I'm hoping that it becomes permanent. I have not seen any time line on when this will take place - any info would be appreciated. Thanks, 11/17/2004 Page 2of3 • �/5 • • Brad Smith 310-374-5267 bradsmith1964@adelphia.net Brad Smith 310-374-5267 bradsmith1964@adelphia.net Brad Smith 310-374-5267 bradsmith1964@adelphia.net 11/17/2004 Page 3 of 3 • • Rick Morgan Page 1 of 2' From: Brad Smith [bradsmith1964@adelphia.net] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 10:31 AM To: Rick Morgan Subject: RE: street lights Thanks Rick, We do live in that area between Ingleside and Morningside and are in front of one of the mid -block lights. My dreams of BB guns, slingshots, paint brush's on a pole, climbing spikes, cherry pickers, rocks, chain saws and other assorted fantasy remedies are coming true. I don't know a single person who has a light in front of their house that doesn't dream of getting rid of it. Thanks again, Brad At 09:09 AM 8/26/2004, you wrote: Brad - It will take approximately 3 -months to start seeing lights out with bags in the first test area (27th St. north and Valley Dr. west). Are you between Ingleside and Morningside? If so, both midblock lights are proposed for removal...Rick Original Message From: Brad Smith[mailto:bradsmith1964@adelphia.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 4:48 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: street lights Rick Morgan, I'm sure I'm not the first to ask, but can the streetlight in front of my house at 445 29th Street be the first one turned off. I am so happy the city is doing this and I'm hoping that it becomes permanent. I have not seen any time line on when this will take place - any info would be appreciated. Thanks, Brad Smith 310-374-5267 8/26/2004 Rick Morgan From: Brad Smith [bradsmith1964@adelPhia.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 4:48 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: street lights Rick Morgan, I'm sure I'm not the first to ask, but can the streetlight in front of my house at 445 29th Street be the first one turned off. I am so happy the city is doing this and I'm hoping that it becomes permanent. I have not seen any time line on when this will take place - any info would be appreciated. Thanks, Brad Smith 310-374-5267 bradsmith1964@adelphia.net • Rick Morgan Page 1 of 1 - From: Leona Anderson [leonaanderson@msn.com] Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 2:58 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Reduction of Hermosa Beach Street Lights Dear Mr. Morgan: Per our telephone conversation this morning (December 20, 2004), I am writing this email to be a hard copy in order for my opinion to count regarding the reduction of street lighting. I have no idea how others feel about the reduction, but my feeling is that where there is light, there is less crime. I am somewhat confused (since I was out of town and did not read the prefacing newspaper articles on the issue); however, if I heard it correctly that it is an either/or choice, something seems wrong. It is like comparing oranges and apples, but if there is truth to that argument, my vote certainly would go with the lighting. DSL is about half the price it was a year ago. Let's 'keep Hermosa Beach a safe place. Leona M. Anderson 12/20/2004 Rick Morgan , From: 4caliva-wolf@verizon.net Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 12:42 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Light in 200 Block of 29th Street Dear Mr. Morgan: I reside at 244 29th Street, Hermosa Beach and have lived here for the past 28 years. This is the first time in all these years that I have felt the need to put in writing my concerns about the action of our city government. Specifically, I am very concerned that the street light across from my home was turned off and "bagged" with no notice to the residents or survey of the residents PRIOR to this action. Without this street light, it is extremely dark in the area resulting in an unsafe situation for people arriving home in the dark, and for those unfamiliar with the area. Further, this is a one-way street which needs the most lighting possible to avoid driver confusion. If the city needs to save money, might I suggest that the residents be polled on the possiblities and that no action be taken that may result in injury or accident. Thank you for your attention to this matter ---please turn the light back on!! Sincerely, Nancy E. Wolf 1 • • A note m . kt13/0,..\ Ria Oeuerlein 5- • • Vr G GO/ ;N.^Q: r 'C CSR • Q: S cA, a ��VC —,O 2 ''• vv W.. -S t cr1. \--t Ria R. Deuetlein 236 34th St. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 _ ', --1 z. -11 65 • Page l of l Rick Morgan From: Razaia@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 9:05 AM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Lights Dear Rick: As you requested, I am writing to document my complaint regarding the bags that were placed on both street lights on the 400 block of 29th street. You stated that only one Tight on my street was to have been turned off as part of this test, so I request that at least one light be reinstated immediately. As for the ludicrous idea that not all streets need lights I invite you to visit mine anytime after dark. You will see what an invitation the extreme darkness could be to anyone wishing to secret themselves in the bushes and trees across from my home. In myopinion this "test" and the subsequent mistake made in it's execution are miserable failures and should be tossed in the "dumb ideas" file. I look forward to seeing at least one of the lights working very soon and I thank you in advance for quickly making right the wrong. I am available to do whatever it takes to make sure that we have safely lit streets and will gladly attend any public hearings on the matter. hope to hear from you very soon. Best regards, Ramanda C. Zaia 11/10/2004 • Rick Morgan • Page l of l From: PaxilDog@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 10:31 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: street lights Dear Richard, Good to meet you today and I am sorry if i seemed upset at you personally regarding this issue of turning certain streets lighths off to save some loot!!! Or to raise taxes 5 bucks per property owner 11? We just paid almost 900 thousand for our beach Shanty and my front door is on the Court,well,Alley is more like it!! Now,the city wants us to live in darkness,except for my lights that are now kept on in -order for us not to stumble over the poor condition of the PAVEMENT Also,we are aware that crime and darkness are synonymous...Good' lighting is always a deterrent against crime!! In any event,if this city of Hermosea beach is in such poor financial shape that STEET LIGHTS MUST BE TURNED OFF,then we made a major mistake buying in this community!!! I am equally shocked that the city council WOULD put the city in possible legal jeopardy over this issue.!! There must be other ways to make up the deficit needed to not resort to such a drastic measure of TURN OFF CERTAIN CITY LIGHTS!!!! I know other neighbors are disturbed by this reckless action and hope that some solution will turn the LIGHTS BACK ON SOON. Sincerely, Jeffrey and Dee Jay Cooper 316 29th Court - 310- 798-8879 11 n ni,nnA Ai6 Rick Morgan From: SylEll@aol.com Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 10:18 AM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Stupid Streetlight Experiment I wrote to you before this foolhardy experiment actually took place and now that it has been implemented, I am writing again. The light on Manhattan Ave and 32nd Place is out as well as the first light east of Manhattan on 32nd P1, it is incredibly dark. Where I park on Longfellow is DARK, I have to walk home from my car in the dark, I don't feel safe and I have never felt this way before. I cannot understand why or how the city can find the money to fund the WiFi project to the tune of $133,000.00 with a monthly cost of $3500.00 and we can't pay for streetlights for the safety and peace of mind of our residents. You told me when I talked to you on the phone last week that it was felt that light from the streetlights on the next street over would filter over to light the streets with their lights out. Do you people not pay attention to the houses that are being approved by the city and built that are taller than the streetlights - tell me how the light from these filter through a house? For the first time in over twenty years of living in Hermosa I think perhaps it may be time to look elsewhere for a place to live that doesn't place the safety of its citizens far beneath ,, free Internet service. Don't get me wrong, I think the WiFi project is great if we can have it with streetlights intact. This is a penny wise pound foolish experiment that will cost the city dearly if one person is hurt because of this. Please reconsider and turn the lights back on. Sylvia Simmons 211 1/2 32nd Place 1 REC NOV 1 9 200; PUBLIC WORKS Message Rick Morgan Page 1 of 1 From: West, Glen [GIen.West@bestsoftware.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 11:55 AM To: Rick Morgan Cc: Ramanda Cole Zaia Subject: Lighting on the 400 block of 29th street Dear Rick: was given your contact information as the person to direct feedback regarding plans to eliminate some or all of the streetlights in the 400 block of 29th Street. As an owner of two lots on 29th street I am first writing to document my complaint regarding the bags that were placed on both street lights. I request that at least one light be reinstated immediately. Secondly, am expressing my concern over any plan that would eliminate either of the lights on our street. Our one way street allows parking on both sides at night and has a very limited number of sidewalks. Our block is at the bottom of a large hill that dramatically reduces the amount of city light we receive. These issues mandate pedestrians travel on the street surface and with the many children and animals on the block, reducing the lighting will most likely increase the probability of an accident. The numerous studies performed over the last 50 years by police, safety and insurance organizations on the inverse relationship of lighting and crime are indisputable. Lighting goes up and crime goes down. Lighting goes down and crime goes up. Their recommendations are consistent, If you want to increase the security of your home or neighborhood, add outside lighting or leave your interior lights on. Proposing to reduce street lighting on an already dark street in Los Angeles County seems to invite trouble. Glen West 11/15/2004 Rick Morgan , 1 • From: Frishette, Bill [Bill.Frishette@nike.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 12:00 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: 400 block of 29th Street Lights Dear Mr. Morgan, It has come to my attention you are the person who may be able to eliminate the burlap bags over both the street lights on the 400 block of 29th Street. As the owner of the 426 29th street residence, I am surprised and shocked the city would eliminate both lights. In addition to the obvious security issues a completely dark street presents, the hazards of simply walking down the street in the dark (there are�no sidewalks) are very dangerous. Because there are no sidewalks, pedestrians must walk down the street to get to the greenbelt, for example, when walking dogs at night. Cars come around the corner faster than they should with nothing but a dark street. Also, the street itself has several large cracks that present hazards to pedestrians even in daylight. Currently at night there is no chance to see these potential stumbling hazards. I. would think from a potential litigation standpoint alone you would want to rethink this blackout policy immediately. I invite you to walk down our street tonight and then tell me if you think this darkened street is appropriate for the quality of life Hermosa Beach represents. Sincerely, Bill Frishette 426 29th Street Hermosa Beach 310 374 1653 1 0 • Rick Morgan • Page 1of1 From: Clfrish@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 7:02 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: (no subject) bear Mr. Morgan, I have been informed that not only are you the guy to help us with our street light problems, but that my husband, Bill Frishette, has already written to you with some concerns. I would like to add my own. We have 8 children on this block, normally capable of walking over to their friend's house in the evening. But with the street dark I don't feel this is safe anymore. Secondly, if the city of Hermosa Beach has enough money to afford the convenience and luxury of WI -FI then most certainly we have enough money to keep our streets safe. Lastly, I would like very much to know who's idea this was in the first place...I understand that the council all voted, but someone had to put this idea on the table, and I'm sure I can track down who eventually, but you can probably answer very quickly. Please, walk our street at 10:00pm and tell me if you feel safe. Thanking you in advance for all of your considerations, C.L. Frishette 426 29th St. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 11/15/2004 Rick Morgan From: norine havard [norinered@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 2:34 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Tight testing Hello Mr Morgan: I am a Hermosa Beach resident at 30th Street & Manhattan Ave & I am concerned about the recent testing going on in our neighborhood. There are at least two lights on 31 Place that have recently been "turned off" making our street dark & unsafe. ' I understand trying to save money on utility costs but at the risk of HB residents' safety? I urge the city council to take a walk & another look at the dark neighborhoods at night, I think you'll see what I'm talking about. Thanks, Norine Havard 227 30th St HB Norine Havard Operations Manager Revolver Films, LLC 2022A Broadway Santa Monica,, CA 90404 norine@revolverfilmsla.com Ph:310-829-2441 Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com 1 ») • • Page 1 of 2 Rick Morgan From: Bernie Zaia [Bzaia@barrington.com] Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 10:11 AM To: Rick Morgan Cc: bill.frishette@nike.com; brad@Ieadpros.com; Bemie Zaia; cswanberg@northwestatlantic.com; Clfrish@aol.com; ggrinnell@adelphia.net; Glen.West@bestsoftware.com; MGrinnell@adelphia.net; jennifer@evolution.com; jwoodie@manhattan.kl2.ca.us; IMLEVIN@msn.com; Ievinbrad@yahoo.com; saraloos@hotmail.com; SLoos@GSN.COM; MsBru21Jan@aol.com; Iisaoberst@hotmail.com; rebeccarosen176@hotmail.com; Iesleyl@adelphia.net; Lynne.bozajian@adelphia.net; Kellypwest@msn.com; glen.west@idysys.com; rdwoodie@adelphia.net; Razaia@aol.com Subject: Street Lights!!!! Rick — Here is a story that appeared in today's LA Times. This is one of the things we are concerned about happening in Hermosa, obviously there are other bad things that could occur resulting from turning off street lights, but here is an example of what actually happened in Des Moines, Iowa when they implemented a similar policy — let's not let this happen in Hermosa Beach! Please turn the street lights back on pronto! Streetlights Reactivated After Death of a Child From Times Wire Reports The hit-and-run death of a 10 -year-old boy on a darkened street last week prompted officials in Des Moines to reverse a decision that turned off nearly one in five streetlights to save money. "It's a safety issue," Mayor Frank Cownie said. By turning off 4,200 of its 23,543 streetlights, the city estimated it would save about $700,000 annually. To pay for keeping the lights on, officials said they would increase property taxes. Bernard I. Zaia Managing Director Barrington Associates 11755 Wilshire Boulevard; 22nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90025 P: 310-473-5335 0 Page 1 of 1 Rick Morgan From: Bernie Zaia [Bzaia@barrington.com] Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 6:50 AM To: Rick Morgan Cc: bill.frishette@nike.com; brad@leadpros.com; Bernie Zaia; cswanberg@northwestatlantic.com; Clfrish@aol.com; ggrinnell@adelphia.net; Glen.West@bestsoftware.com; MGrinnell@adelphia.net; jennifer@evolution.com; jwoodie@manhattan.kl2.ca.us; IMLEVIN@msn.com; levinbrad@yahoo.com; saraloos@hotmail.com; SLoos@GSN.COM; MsBru21Jan@aol.com; lisaoberst@hotmail.com; rebeccarosen176@hotmail.com; lesleyl@adelphia.net; Lynne.bozajian@adelphia.net; Kellypwest@msn.com; glen.west@idysys.com; rdwoodie@adelphia.net Subject: Street Lights on 29th Street (and North Hermosa) Rick - My wife informed me that you are the appropriate person to correspond with regarding the recent "sacking" of the street lights on 29th street (and others in North Hermosa) and, consequently, I am sending this email to you. I find it absurd that Hermosa Beach would conclude that shutting down street lights is an intelligent way to save money and was shocked when I heard it was effecting this test (especially a few days before Halloween when lots of kids were to be present). As a result of the burlap bags, our street is pitch dark at nights and, in my opinion, unsafe in many respects. Motorists cannot see pedestrians, children are now basically precluded from being outside after dark and bad guys have a bevy of places they can set up shop, ranging from behind cars to behind bushes — psychologically and practically, if I was someone who wanted to commit a crime, I would gravitate to a darker location as opposed to one with street lights. This is why in high crime areas they have much higher watt street lights, I am sure you have observed this in your travels. I have never walked around afraid of being attacked, mugged or robbed, even in some very bad neighborhoods across the country, but I have to admit, when I park my car at night, I now feel uncomfortable in my own neighborhood and can imagine how some of the women on our street feel. The City fathers have made a lot of good decisions over the years in Hermosa which have resulted in a vibrant town economy, influx of good people to our community, investment in real estate, building of attractive recreation facilities and parks and a general well being of the community — with this town's revenue base, I find it hard to believe the that savings from shutting off street lights add up to a meaningful amount of dollars — and even if they do, turning them off is the WRONG decision. You are in a position of responsibility here, make the right decision and get this thing fixed. If you want to speak to me about this, my contact information is below. Best regards, your neighbor, Bernie Zaia. Bernard I. Zaia 437 29th Street 310-376-1203 E: bzaia@baib.coin 11/15/2004 • November 17, 2004 Rick Morgan 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 1 7 " PUL OR S Dear Mr. Morgan: This is a follow-up (second) letter to our first letter (dated October 28, 2004) requesting the street lights in front of, and in the alley behind, 321 28th Street be turned back on. As mentioned in our first letter our concern for the Halloween trick -or -treaters turned out to be dangerous for the children running from house-to-house. Many of the parents commented on how dark it was outside our house. We were very diligent in warning the children and their parents about watching their step in the dark. Several of our neighbors walk their dogs in the alley behind our house and find it hard to avoid pot holes and uneven ground in the dark. They have complained to us about how dark it is behind our house, not realizing it was the city's idea to put us in the dark. During one of Mayor Sam Edgerton's walks near our house we informed him of our complaint and he asked us to send him a copy of our first letter and any follow- up letters we write. Therefore, he is cc'd on this letter. We again urge the city to reconsider turning out our street lights as a cost saving measure. It is unsafe and encourages crime in our area. Thank you again for taking our complaint seriously. Britt & Dolly Johnson 321 28th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 379-8972 cc: Mayor Sam Edgerton r October 28, 2004 Rick Morgan 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 • • R:E EWED OCT 2 3 2004 PUBLIC WORKS Dear Mr. Morgan: As long time residents on 28th Street in Hermosa Beach, we would like to register a complaint about turning -out the street light in front of our house on Wednesday, 10/27/04. Added to this complaint is the fact that you also turned -off the lightin the alley behind our house leaving us virtually in the dark. We have already had two robberies of our house and now feel very vulnerable for a third episode. In addition to the robberies my husband's truck was broken into last December 26th, while parked in front of our house, when the same street light on 28th Street was out. He filed a police report, but none of the valuable tools or products stolen were ever recovered. . We know the City is looking for ways to cut costs, but turning -out street lights isn'.t the best solution. We are also concerned about the young children who will be trick -or -treating this Sunday, 10/31/04. The time changes on Saturday, 10/30/04, makes it dark at .an .earlier :t.ime :and..we,.doe `.t want to have any children hurt because they are excited, usually running from house-to-house, and will trip or miss steps in their pursuit of holiday treats. Please take this complaint under advisement and consider turning these two lights back on to prevent any more problems. Feel free to contact us if you need to discuss this or require more explicit information. Thank you for considering our complaint/request. Britt & Dolly Johnson 321 28th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 379-8972 Rick Morgan Page 1 of 1 From: Virginiashaal@cs.com Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 4:28 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Re: Street Lights. I want the street lights to be left on. I feel it is unfair to the residents of Hermosa to have give up safety for the wi- fi. Virginia C. Shaal 11/3/2004 • Rick Morgan Page 1 of 1 • From: Virginiashaal@cs.com Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 1:53 PM To: artyoon@hotmail.com; Rick Morgan Cc: gobblese@sce.com; bradkemail@yahoo.com; Selfreliantone@aol.com Subject: Reduction of Hermosa Street Lights First, I wish to say thanks to Michael Flahery (Head of Public Works) for his telephone calls. I do not have his E- mail address. Perhaps Rick Morgan will forward this message to him? I hope so. I walked to the North end of town this morning. I am trying to recover from the South Bay Virus, and I want to get my strength back. I noticed that the Walk Streets in the North End of Hermosa do not have every other street light covered with a bag. Why? The lights in the Test Area that are covered with bags start on Hermosa Avenue. I also noticed that there are different light styles in some of the walk streets (for example the 18th & 17th walk streets have different style of fixtures). Is this because some of Hermosa's lights are owned and maintained by Southern Cal Edison? Or did the residences pay for the different style of light fixtures? I have learned from the Head of Public Works that some of our fixtures in the City are owned and maintained by So. Cal. Edison. I also learned that SBC is lowering their DSL coverage to approx. $20 per month. I know that strain of economics, believe me! I would expect that other providers of DSL lines will soon lower their rates to be competitive. Also, since the City now contracts out the maintenance of keeping up the parks and other public areas, is it possible that the contracting out of the street lights might save the City money? I do realize the City budget has to balance. I also do realize that this would cause some folks to lose their jobs. Why am I so concerned? One I have lived in Hermosa over 30 years, and I like to walk. Also, until approx. March of 2004, there was a gang element living in our complex. Please check of the Redondo Beach Police Department about their "Show of Force" on Sunday of President's Weekend in February of 2004. This element was here by default. Two members of the Pacifica Villa Board of Directors went and talked to the owner of the residence. Fortunately the owner was responsible, and the element disappeared (at least for the time being). It was spooky— graffiti painted on the walls of the complex, very strange cars around the residence, etc. As I mentioned to Rick Morgan, the employees at the New Sav-On (on 2nd & PCH) are certainly concerned about the proposed lighting reduction. There is a Security Guard on duty on the weekends. And God bless the folks working at 7-11 on 5th & PCH. They must feel like "living targets." Don't these businesses bring in tax revenue to the City? • We had an incident at Second and Valley last Sunday with helicopters, etc. Two suspects were involved. The incident was well documented in the BREEZE, the EASY READER, and THE BEACH REPORTER. I truly believe we will have more incidents like this with a reduction of street lights. do hope one other Councilperson will vote for NOT turning off every other street light in the City and covering the lights with bags. We will look like a third -world country, BUT with a Wi-Fi line. God Willing, I will be able to come to the Meeting in January or February of 2005 to see Mayor Yoon "duke it out" with Council Persons Revizcky and Keegan. Also again, I wish to acknowledge Sam Edgerton for being aware of possible expenses involved in maintaining the Wi-Fi. My thanks to all. Virginia C. Shaal 11/29/2004 Rick Morgan • • From: Art Yoon [artyoon@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:37 AM To: Virginiashaal@cs.com; gobblese@sce.com Cc: - Rick Morgan Subject: RE: Reduction of Street Lights in Hermosa Beach To be clear, wifi is not the reason why the street lioghts are being truned off. It is not one or the other. The council majority made this move before voting on wifi and at no time was there a debate over which should be the priority. From: Virginiashaal@cs.com To: gobblese@sce.com CC: artyoon@hotmail.com, Rmorgan@Hermosabch.org Subject: Reduction of Street Lights in Hermosa Beach Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:17:39 EST Thank you for sending me the information package about the various lighting choices available for street lighting. I stopped by your office and spoke with your Adm. Assistant, and I think that is the reason you sent the package to me. I have been informed that there will be a meeting to address the reduction of lighting in Hermosa Beach either in January or February 2005. I do hope that you or one of your assistants are able attend the meeting. The reduction in lighting is being made necessary by the finances caused by Wi-Fi• installation that the City Council has decided upon. I do hope that you will let Rick Morgan (Hermosa Beach City Manager) know of your interest in attending. Rick's E-mail address is Rmorgan@Hermosabch.org. Art Yoon is our mayor. I do not want a reduction of street lights in the city. The Public Works Department has advised me that Edison owns and maintains a portion of our street lights. Thank you. Virginia Shaal 1 • Rick Morgan Page l of l From: Brad Levin [levinbrad@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 4:55 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Lights - 29th st. Mr. Morgan, As the owner of two properties on 29th Street (434-436, 435 29th street) I too would like to voice an opinion that request too have the lights back for many of the same reasons you have already heard. -Should you have any questions I can be reached at 310 538-6728. Thanks Brad Levin Do you Yahoo!? Discover all that's new in My Yahoo! 11/23/2004 From: Jackie Drasco Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 7:48 AM To: Rhea Punneo Subject: FW: Tamp posts RHEA - RIGHT AFTER I SAID I HAD RECEIVED NO COMPLAINTS, HERE IS ONE! Jackie Original Message From: cindy Whitehead[mailto:cindy.whitehead©verizon.net] Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 6:30 AM To: City Clerk Subject: lamp posts Dear City/Director of Engineering, etc., We live at 2804 Ingleside Drive in Hermosa. we are right at the corner of the 28th place alley where the city decided to cover/turn off the street lights to save on money. The problem is we already have issues with theft and people rummaging through the trash in this alley and now it is very unsafe as its completely dark as well. The other street light in our area that has been turned off is in the back of our property which faces Valley Drive. This area is now enveloped in complete darkness too and leaves the back area of our home quite vulnerable which makes me feel quite unsafe as my bedroom is back there. I understand the cities need to save money but doing so by turning off these street lights creates an unsafe situation for all of us. I have lived in HB for 42 years (all my life!) and never felt unsafe, but this situation is really making me feel uncomfortable in my own home. I know that most of my neighbors also feel this way (like older resident Mimi French at 2802 Ingleside Drive) but not all of them have access to computers to let you know about this problem - is there a form they can pick up & fill out so this matter can get the attention it deserves? Thank you! Cindy & Ian Logan 310-379-3113 2804 Ingleside Drive Hermosa Beach \1 • Ahs -\.t TutT wctjS f; boiP14- ONA 3pO. 4,4/-42 C�° Burlap on the Street Lights o Rick Morgan th Street • Page 1 of 1 From: dinny [dinny@imageworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 2:10 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Burlap on the Street Lights on 29th Street I have just returned from a trip and noticed that the street lights on 29th Street are covered with BURLAP! Can you please tell me what this is supposed to accomplish? I thought the purpose of having lighted streets was for safety, protection and security. Now this is no longer TRUE. I would appreciate hearing from you at your earliest convenience so that this problem can be rectified ASAP?, pinny Miller 11 i)i')nna Rick Morgan • • From: julieann.forney@southbaybrokers.com Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 5:49 AM To: Rick Morgan Subject: [Fwd: street lighting in H.B.] Missed the "r" on your email address the first time From: <julieann.forneyOsouthbaybrokers.com> Date: 2004/08/12 Thu AM 05:46:41 PDT To: <morgan@hermosabch.org> Subject:. street lighting in H.B. Hi, I've lived in Hermosa for 20 years now. While I -sympathize with the residents that are bothered by lights coming in their windows I feel strongly that street. lights are an. important safety feature that we should keep in Hermosa. Perhaps you could investigate the lights that bother people and turn those off? All I know is that in the last 20 years things have gotten more and more perilous...not just in H.B. but in neighboring cities as well. What about the cars that are vandalized and stolen from Hermosa Ave.? Don't you think that the number will go up if there is less lighting? What about other crimes? I vote for keeping the lights. Thanks, Julie -Ann Julie -Ann Forney, South Bay Brokers julieann.forney@southbaybrokers.com 310-374-7334 Direct 310-721-8628 Cell 310-375-0583 ext. 623 Office Julie -Ann Forney, South Bay Brokers julieann.forney@southbaybrokers.com 310-374-7334 Direct 310-721-8628 Cell . 310-375-0583 ext. 623 Office 1 • Page l of l Rick Morgan From: Todd Calish [toddcalish@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 1:07 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Lights I am concerned about light removal on the Strand. Already if a lamp goes out on a fixture and there is a dark zone between working fixtures, pedestrians are uncomfortable in the darkness when strangers are approaching and you can't tell whether they are potentially threatening or not. I would like to keep all of the existing Strand lights working. Why is this test being limited to Valley Drive to the east? I'm sure there are plenty of streets east of that boundary where the residents would be happy to have the number of street lights reduced. - Todd Calish 650 10th Street 310-379-2674 11 hi)nna 1 Rick Morgan • • From: Cassidy, Michael [mcassidy@colliers-seeley.com] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:31 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street lights Rick, Thanks for asking! I think it would be wise to leave all of the Strand lights on for safety and security. There is a lot of mixed traffic there and it is hard to see even with the existing lights. There are numerous lights that the majority of residents would like to see eliminated' because they shine right into peoples windows. This is true of the strand also but that is more dangerous and widely traveled particularily at night on bikes without lights. We live on 20th st between Hermosa and the Strand and any light you would like to eliminate around us would be fine. There is one in the alley on 21st court that you would receive a standing ovation for removing. 20th st has one which looks hideous and has not worked for more than 2 years in the last 10. No complaints there. 20th and Beach would be at the top our neighbors and our list. There has never been a kind word said about that light. I think your startegy of covering them temporarily is sound. It allows everyone to experience the change and make comments. Unfortunately people find it easier to complain so if you get a lot of static on individual lights make sure you survey all of the neighbors. The response will be positive in most cases because we live soo close together: If you want to kick off your program please try the lights I mentioned. 1 • Rick Morgan Page 1 of 4 From: r f [rf90254@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:43 AM To: Rick Morgan Cc: citycouncil@hermosabch.org Subject: RE: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article WED 10-27-04 Rick - I don't appreciate being lied to. You stated "ALL will remain on 27th St (Gould)". EDISON just covered up the street lamp at the southeast corner of 27th and Manhattan Ave. I would have fought this at City Council if I had been told the truth. Ron Felsing Rick Morgan <rmorgan@hermosabch.org> wrote: I walked entire area with Councilmembers Tucker and Revicsky...They agreed with you, one light will remain midblock on 28th Ct also ALL will remain on 27th St (Gould)...Rick Original Message From: r f [mailto:rf90254@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 11:57 AM To: Rick Morgan Subject: RE: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article Read in Sunday's DAILY BREEZE that Hermosa will be $75,000 richer from American Express cancelling the Sheryl Crow concert, donating the money to the city. I would like to see this money go to keeping our street lights lite. For safety reasons, I still would like to see ALL lights kept lite on narrow 27th Street. There are 2 street lamps in 28th Court. Please keep the one in the 200 block lite in the experimental program. • - Rick Morgan <rmorgan@hermosabch.org> wrote: Of course I discussed with Police, City Attorney as well. I thought you'd like to hear direct from the Chief. Your tax bill has an assessment of $41.45 per year for Lighting/Landscaping District. This pays for street lighting and median/parkway landscaping maintenance. The District has been running a deficit of about S140,000 per year and that is why Council is investigating the option of reduced lighting. This is a test and your comments are important to evaluating its success or failure. Rick Original Message o From: r f [mailto:rf90254@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 6:04 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: RE: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article 11/2/2004 S This wasn't discussed with Chief Lavin prior to this "experimental program"??! I could be mistaken, but isn't there a seperate tax for city lighting on our tax bill? I feel "safe" here in our community. Cost me a little more money? that's okay. Rick Morgan <rmorgan hermosabch.org> wrote: Ron - I'll forward this question direct to the Chief Lavin for his response. ...Rick Original Message From: r f [mailto:rf90254@yahoo.com) Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 4:02 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: RE: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article Rick - I am curious to know the Police Chiefs thoughts on this matter of darkening the street lights? Any crime statistics from other communities on the matter? I don't mind seeing my tax dollars paying for such lighting. Ron Felsing Rick Morgan <rmorgan@hermosabch.org> wrote: Thank you for your comments in support of keeping lights on. The Council has directed staff to implement this lighting reduction in a test area (NW portion of City, North of 27th, West of Valley). We will be turning off approximately 30% of these lights within the next 3 months. We invite public comment which we will take back to Council to determine if we will continue city-wide or abandon this project and turn the lights back on. Your response will be included in that report to Council. As to your option of using energy efficient lights, the majority of lights in the City are already Sodium Vapor which is the most energy efficient light used for street lighting....Thanks again, Rick Original Message ---- From: r f [mailto:rf90254@yahoo.com] 11/2/2004 Page 2 of 4 s Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 1:11 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Lights - DAILY BREEZE article Mr. Morgan, I am on 27th Street, between Morningside and Manhattan Ave. For traffic safety sake, I hope all the street lights between Morningside and Manhattan Ave are kept on. Drivers from the east have had wide Artesia, then wide Gould along the 2 blocks west from PCH/Sepulveda. Then the street narrows at Morningside, after Valley Park, when it becomes 27th. Most drivers from the west have come from double lanes Hermosa Ave. Couple months ago was even a hit-and-run sideswipe during the daylight hours. Any time I have seen a lamp out between Moringside and Manhattan Ave I have given the city a call to report it. Is there such a thing as more energy efficient street lamps? I wouldn't mind our 27th Street to be an experiment to try those out. So, no, to blacking -out any of our street lamps. 11/2/2004 Page 3 of 4 • Ron Felsing Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now. Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now. ;Do you Yahoo!? -Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. >o You Yahoo!? 'fired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around ttp://mail.yahoo.com 11/2/2004 Page 4 of 4 • Page l of 2 Rick Morgan From: Mike Lavin Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 7:48 AM To: Rick Morgan; 'r f Subject: Street Lights on 27th Mr. Felsing: I do not have any statistics on the impact of reducing street lights on residential streets. When it comes to burglary suppression, we have always preached about the methods of strengthening homes from intruders. One of the best things to do around a house is to install good lighting at all entrances and ill" secluded areas around the home where a burglar could lie in wait without being seen. For years people have been installing the lights around their homes with motion detectors (they light up when there is - movement in the vicinity). Ofcourse in addition to lighting, there are measures such as making sure doors and windows have good locks. Alarm systems are very helpful as well as long as all other measures are taken. Burglary is generally a crime of opportunity. People are constantly leaving doors unlocked and windows open and therefore become vulnerable to intruders. I stand back and look at my own home and try and figure out how I would break in if I had to and then I strengthen those potential points of entry. Each home has to be evaluated. If a burglar looks at a home and it appears to be well lighted and locked up, they usually will continue on looking for the easy entry. They don't want to spend a lot of time trying to get in to a home that has beefed up security. They risk making noise or being spotted by a neighbor who hopefully would call the police. Lighting is important as long as additional measures are taken to enhance security. I hope this long answer is of some help. Mike Lavin, Chief of Police Cc: Mike Lavin Subject: RE: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article Ron - I'll forward this question direct to the Chief Lavin for his response. ...Rick Original Message From: r f [mailto:rf90254@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 4:02 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: RE: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article Rick - I am curious to know the Police Chiefs thoughts on this matter of darkening the street lights? Any crime statistics from other communities on the matter? I don't mind seeing my tax dollars paying for such lighting. 8/24/2004 Page 1 of 2 Rick Morgan From: Rick Morgan Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 8:12 AM To: 'r f Subject: RE: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article Of course I discussed with Police, City Attorney as well. I thought you'd like to hear direct from the Chief. Your tax bill has an assessment of $41.45 per year for Lighting/Landscaping District. This pays for street lighting and median/parkway landscaping maintenance. The District has been running a deficit of about $140,000 per year and that is why Council is investigating the option of reduced lighting. This is a test and your comments are important to evaluating its success or failure. Rick Original Message From: r f [mailto:rf90254@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 6:04 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: RE: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article This wasn't discussed with Chief Lavin prior to this "experimental program"??! I could be mistaken, but isn't there a seperate tax for city lighting on our tax bill? I feel "safe" here in our community. Cost me a little more money? that's okay. Rick Morgan <rmorgan( Jhermosabch.org> wrote: Ron - I'II forward this question direct to the Chief Lavin for his response. ...Rick 8/24/2004 Original Message From: r f [mailto:rf90254@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 4:02 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: RE: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article Rick - I am curious to know the Police Chief's thoughts on this matter of darkening the street lights? Any crime statistics from other communities on the matter? I don't mind seeing my tax dollars paying for such lighting. Ron Felsing Rick Morgan <rmorgan :ermosabch.org> wrote: Thank you for your comments in support of keeping lights on. The Council has directed staff to implement this lighting reduction in a test area (NW portion of City, North of 27th, West of Valley). We will be turning off approximately 30% of these lights within the next 3 months. We invite public comment which we will take back to Council to determine if we will continue city-wide or abandon this project and turn the lights back on. Your response will be included in that report to Council. As to your option of using energy efficient lights, the majority of lights in the City are already Sodium Vapor which is the most energy efficient light used for street • Page 2 of 2 Ron Felsing Rick Morgan <rmorgan hermosabch.org> wrote: Thank you for your comments in support of keeping lights on. The Council has directed staff to implement this lighting reduction in a test area (NW portion of City, North of 27th, West of Valley). We will be turning off approximately 30% of these lights within the next 3 months. We invite public comment which we will take back to Council to determine if we will continue city-wide or abandon this project and turn the lights back on. Your response will be included in that report to Council. As to your option of using energy efficient lights, the majority of lights in the City are already Sodium Vapor which is the most energy efficient light used for street lighting....Thanks again, Rick Original Message From: r f [mailto:rf90254@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 1:11 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article Mr. Morgan, I am on 27th Street, between Morningside. and Manhattan Ave. For traffic safety sake, I hope all the street lights between Morningside and Manhattan Ave are kept on. Drivers from the east have had wide Artesia, then wide Gould along the 2 blocks west from PCH/Sepulveda. Then the street narrows at Morningside, after Valley Park, when it becomes 27th. Most drivers from the west have come from double lanes Hermosa Ave. Couple months ago was even a hit-and-run sideswipe during the daylight hours. Any time I have seen a lamp out between Moringside and Manhattan Ave I have given the city a call to report it. Is there such a thing as more energy efficient street lamps? I wouldn't mind our 27th Street to be an experiment to try those out. So, no, to blacking -out any of our street lamps. Ron Felsing Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from. Yahoo! Enter now. R/-4/,nna • Rick Morgan Page 1 of 2 From: r f (rf90254@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 4:02 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: RE: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article Rick - I am curious to know the Police Chiefs thoughts on this matter of darkening the street lights? Any crime statistics from other communities on the matter? I don't mind seeing my tax dollars paying for such lighting. Ron Felsing Rick Morgan <rmorgan hermosabch.org> wrote: Thank you for your comments in support of keeping lights on. The Council has directed staff to implement this lighting reduction in a test area (NW portion of City, North of 27th, West of Valley). We will be turning off approximately 30% of these lights within the next 3 months. We invite public comment which we will take back to Council to determine if we will continue city-wide or abandon this project and turn the lights back on. Your response will be included in that report to Council. As to your option of using energy efficient lights, the majority of lights in the City are already Sodium Vapor which is the most energy efficient light used for street lighting. ...Thanks again, Rick Original Message From: r f [mailto:rf90254@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 1:11 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article Mr. Morgan, I am on 27th Street, between Morningside and Manhattan Ave. For traffic safety sake, I hope all the street lights between Morningside and Manhattan Ave are kept on. Drivers from the east have had wide Artesia, then wide Gould along the 2 blocks west from PCH/Sepulveda. Then the street narrows at Morningside, after Valley Park, when it becomes 27th. Most drivers from the west have come from double lanes Hermosa Ave. Couple months ago was even a hit-and-run sideswipe during the daylight hours. Any time I have seen a lamp out between Moringside and Manhattan Ave I have given the city a call to report it. Is there such a thing as more energy efficient street lamps? I wouldn't mind our 27th Street to be an experiment to try those out. So, no, to blacking -out any of our street lamps. Ron Felsing 8/23/2004 • lighting. ...Thanks again, Rick Original Message From: r f [mailto:rf90254@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 1:11 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Lights- DAILY BREEZE article • Page 2 of 2 Mr. Morgan, I am on 27th Street, between Morningside and Manhattan Ave. For traffic safety sake, I hope all the street lights between Momingside and Manhattan Ave are kept on. Drivers from the east have had wide Artesia, then wide Gould along the 2 blocks west from PCH/Sepulveda. Then the street narrows at Morningside, after Valley Park, when it becomes 27th. Most drivers from the west have come from double lanes Hermosa Ave. Couple months ago was even a hit-and-run sideswipe during the daylight hours. Any time I have seen a lamp out between Moringside and Manhattan Ave I have given the city a call to report it. Is there such a thing as more energy efficient street lamps? I wouldn't mind our 27th Street to be an experiment to try those out. So, no, to blacking -out any of our street lamps. Ron Felsing Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now. Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now. 8/24/2004 Page 1 of 1 Rick Morgan From: Ihennis [Ihennis@bnet.org] Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 6:47 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Turning Off Streetlights - BAD IDEA As the Daily Breeze lead said: "...open invitation to criminals?" That's my opinion of what will result from this penny wise, pound foolish idea. The only people who like it are star gazers (until they get mugged in their dark front yard or alley), those to cheap to buy drapes for their $lmil+ home, and, of course, the criminals. Charge everyone in the city about $6/year more and we'll keep our streets well lit and safe. Lee Hennis 2216 Monterey Blvd. Hermosa Beach PS: As a property owner, I pay a "Light Maint Dist" assessment on my property tax. Where does this money go and, if it isn't enough, why don't you raise the fee? Since it's a tax, we would probably have to vote on it, but then, at least, the majority (or 2/3) of the voters would govern the outcome. 4. 8/23/2004 v Rhea Punneo From: Jackie Drasco on behalf of City Clerk Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 3:27 PM To: 'Djoceb@aol.com' Cc: Rhea Punneo Subject: RE: street lights I am forwarding your email to our Public Works Dept for a response. Jackie Drasco Deputy City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach :XE1'6 0J OCT2 8 236-1 PUBLIC; WORKS Original Message From: Djoceb@aol.com [mailto:Djoceb@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 2:54 PM To: City Clerk Subject: street lights For reasons unknown, city workers have placed a "very attractive" burlap bag over the street Tight at 231 29th St. The effect is that the street is extremely dark, creating both the risk of injury and lack of security. Furthermore, 29th St. is one way, marked by nearly invisible signs at the each end of the street. It is not uncommon for drivers to proceed the wrong way up the street. Increased darkness exacerbates the opportunity for accident and City liability. What's the point? Save money in a way.that makes sense, not jeopardizes the security and safety of residents. Carrol E. Beals, David J. O'Leary GWEN W. REESE RECEIVED SEP 1 3 2004 Per 223 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach. CA 90254 376-3319 Seltreliaiuone (r aol.com September 8, 2004 Stephen Burrell 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. Burrell, I am writing to protest the decision to turn off some street lights in Hermosa. Although I do understand „, that you have budget constraints, I hope that you will reconsider your decision. Hermosa Beach seems to be a very safe place to live. Many of us so enjoy being able to walk downtown in the evenings and will be,more reluctant to do so with reduced lighting. Also, we feel more protected from the threat of burglary with good lighting. Our townhouse complex has recently increased the lighting with the installation of new fixtures. Please help us to keep Hermosa Beach safe. Sincerely, J\ 4. 4 4)9-A -6441 g21(/ 2-•__L___,L'')""4"-' v24._____c(--et-A-e-:a7--c- • g - g—ca /Le) e4/ tt,o UA -e_ Ag -d -e) /6e-ez-‘47,4zda &GL4v LA -Lea tP 6(1e4Z- fq:e o m_z&s_ • Robert K. Shaal 263 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310-798-2335 shaalr@cs.com July 16, 2004 Steve Burrell, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RECEIVED JUL 1 9 2004 Per • Dear Mr. Burrell: The Easy -Reader had a recent article regarding the city's plan to save money by removing half of the streetlights. I disagree with this economy measure. One of the advantages of living in Hermosa Beach is that you can walk to most things. Many of us walk at night. Reducing the number of streetlights makes this more difficult and more dangerous. Please let me know the appropriate venue to protest this change. Thank you. Sincerely, • • ci6t& c<lem- ci6a4/-* • 329 c% Ad c Amada �caab, wh„... 90254 .ydcgel rc • r 54;),), 44/L6-A-a't(/.6ixoL go Ce /1/7)161Adife-aK )}eqe47(/6 att4, 35irf& iLer 67.- p ,Oe� ,,,,apn,,, dpi„Ao� c� J%- L,/7'oqh1A1/.Phe-) ta , / • ww 967m -u ;i// , J / la6 .7L Ay: Ji/c,(17/11 r5. c Gth_ itual U -L APAIA:x o e L A-t,e9 ,edev ey i-Z4Y,/Ae- Lt_11 7/&`k7rit- ' frL GrvrAJ 9ZrA-ez-Z- d_eJe-rp„J %ee74:- .1/41,z.ee6 D`7(A) 4:,X /6ad /-7.,e,y_ze/-- te.e6 cdc4- 7Lee6t fi ,/K26A-efe_-) -re -c L4z ce)P4- /o- dzcz_ "._&0 6T-vaza_. - 2 — Aa - /CA -6 22z-4'21-6- e-6)-.2zez-4,--xe 0 iJ 0.:;1-14;x4 ALL). e8e.x/L) d4 - RECEIVED DEC 2 PUBLIC WORKS Rick Morgan From: sutton@bnet.org Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 8:45 PM To: artyoon@hotmail.bnet.org; Rick Morgan; gobblese@sce.com; selfreliant@aol.com Subject: Street Lighting Please add my endorsement to those who have sent E-mails regarding Hermosa Beach street lighting. I would ask the Council to check reasons why other cities emphasize ample street lighting in their crime -fighting programs. Criminals don't like lighted streets; law-abiding citizens do. Milo Sutton 415 Second Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ 1 FOR ADDRESS AGAINST ADDRESS Brent & Beth Harris 3410 Hermosa Ave. & 111 34th St. John Cologne 340 30th St. Glenn Cole 253 31st St. Bud & Joanne Gottesman not provided "(in the test area)" Stephen Brown 121 28th St. Gary & Margot Knight 407 30th St. James last name and address withheld William Jones 243 31St St. Arthur Mazirow 2918 The Strand Donna Cox 348 28th St. JoAnn Lach 521 31St St. Alyse Laemmle 2840 The Strand Diana Weatherly 3101 Valley Drive TOTAL — SUPPLEMENTAL 3 TOTAL — SUPPLEMENTAL 10 TOTAL FOR 4 TOTAL AGAINST 29 COMBINED TOTALS 7 39 Additional comments received from: Ron Felsing, 1/10/05 Original comments included in first packet. 6arnnm SUPPLEMENTAL • • January 7, 2005 Richard D. Morgan, P.E., Director of Public Works 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Subject: Street Light Reduction Test Dear Mr. Morgan, .JAN i [i 2005 3 My wife and family who live at both 3410 Hermosa Avenue and 111 34th Street (2 parcels) wanted to voice our strong support of making the street light reductions permanent. Particularly valuable have been those extinguished lights on Palm between 34th & 35th Street, east side, the light at the edge of the steps to the Strand, and in front of 111 34th Street, in the median strip - - though we support all reductions being made permanent. I don't understand the proposed assessment, but it is very nominal, and I'm sure it would be well spent. I would support the proposed increased assessment for both our parcels and would favor even higher assessments in the future for the betterment of our neighborhood. Thank you for your forward thinking in reducing lighting pollution in our neighborhood. We appreciate it. Sincerely, Brent & Beth Harris Rick Morgan • • From: Glenn Cole [glenn@72sunny.com] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:23 AM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Lighting Reduction hello Mr. Morgan. my name is glenn cole. i am a Hermosa homeowner at 253 31st street. i got your email address from the public notice regarding this tuesday's hearing (jan 11) on the street lighting reduction test project. unfortunately i will not be able to attend tuesday's meeting in person but i want to express my support for the project and hope it becomes permanent and citywide. i have not noticed or felt any reduction in safety as a result of the test and in fact, have been greatly relieved (and even better rested) with the reduced light in our neighborhood, namely the alleys, towards which most of our bedrooms face. And it is simply relieving to have less light pollution in general. if this requires an approval to increase a local assessment for Lighting/Landscaping by $10/year, i am in total support of it. It is well worth it. if there is any other way you would recommend i express support for this project without the abililty to be in attendance, please inform me. thanks very much. glenn cole 253 31st Street 310.376.4057 1 • • Rick Morgan Page 1 of 1 .. From: stephen [stephen@fang-fashion.com] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 1:48 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: STREET LIGHTING REDUCTION Rick,my name is Stephen Brown ,i live at 121 28st Hermosa Beach C.A 90254,we had a conversation earlier to day regarding the reduction of street lighting in Hermosa Beach,my cross street is 28 st and Palm,i was very happy when the horrible street light that is directly outside my house was turned off, it is bad enough with all the disgusting phone lines that virtually hit me in the face as i sit on my deck.Please,Please ,keep the lights off. regards Stephen Brown 1/10/2005 • • Rick Morgan Page 1 of 1 From: JKOLN@aol.com Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 3:32 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Lighting I am a "senior" citizen and the first thing that I would do would be to rescind the street lighting rebates to seniors. I don't know the reason for the rebates - cancel them! This would help with to keep the costs down on street lighting. I feel that maybe a few lights on some of the large streets, such as Manhattan Avenue, could be removed from the Edison poles. I have noted that the "alleys" - 30th Place, 31st Plane, etc are very, very dark; it's not safe. Let's put the lights back on. A less that $10 yearly assessment should be more that acceptable to any reasonable person. John Cologne 340 30th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 1/10/2005 Rick Morgan • • From: Budandjo@aol.com Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 3:10 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: street lights a lighting reduction plan in the city of hermosa beach is absolutely crazy...access us and at least make an effort to keep our streets safe!!! bud and joanne gottesman (in the test area) 1 • • Rick Morgan Page 1 of 1 From: Margot Knight [mbk.knight@mindspring.com] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 2:49 PM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Light's To whom it may concern: There is no lighting on Morningside and 31st and 30th Place; we would like to have the lights reinstalled. Sincerely, Gary and Margot Knight 407 -30th Street Hermosa Beach, Ca 90254 310 374 2552 1/10/2005 Rick Morgan From: scific@earthlink.net Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 11:28 AM To: michael@manhattanbread.com; samedgerton@aol.com; peter@electpetertucker.com; jbrhbcc@aol.com; artyoon@hotmail.com Cc: Rick Morgan Subject: Comments about Street Lighting Project! Dear Public Servant, This afternoon, I received a Public Notice informing me that the City Council will consider the Street Lighting Reduction Test project, tomorrow at 7 PM. One can only wonder why the city feels that a 24 hour notice for this event is sufficient! With this email, I would like to inform you about my comments on the Lighting Reduction Test Project. For the past few weeks, my family and I have been subjected to a darken street where we are forced to walk in the street in complete darkness at night. I do not mean on the sidewalk but actually in the street itself. The reason that we have to walk in the street is due to the careless permits the city has allocated to various citizens to build fences on the city easements. Even when appealed this permits have been given without regard to public safety. Once can only imagine the liability of the city if and when a citizen is hit by a car when forced to walk in a pitch-black street. One dead or serious injury could make the city liable for sums that my reach in the million dollars. I would respectfully appeal your decision to disconnect city lights and would also suggest that you start an investigation to determine who is/was responsible for allowing some of the citizens to build fences or patios on the city easements thus practically removing the side walk. The combination of no sidewalk and no light is a very dangerous one, which could make the city liable for any accident happening due to this combination! If you would like to investigate this further, I suggest that you walk a night in the 400th block of 30th Street and experience this for yourself. Sincerely, James Name and address withheld 1 Rick Morgan From: Sent: To: Subject: Mr. Morgan: William Jones [wmbee@adelphia.net] Monday, January 10, 2005 7:55 AM Rick Morgan Street Lighting Reduction Don't you think it would have been Hermosa that there was a reason we alleys for the last few months? Of out of it for you people. We might terminate your little game early. polite to inform us guinea pigs in North have been stumbling blindly down dark course that would have taken all the fun have complained and you might have had to I did complain to Edison a couple of months ago about the three (3) street lights near me that weren't working, two consecutive ones on 32nd place and one on Longfellow. You will be happy to know that they kept your little secret. I have been procrastinating on complaining to the city in part because I didn't know who to complain to. Now I do. As to a $10 increase in fees, it seems to me that you could have used the money you spent on the extensive and unnecessary remodeling of Valley Park for this purpose. And in any case, the people south of 27th street who haven't been subjected to this experiment should have to pay any extra fees first. I don't know if I will be able to attend the city council meeting tomorrow. I may well be spending the time watching the surrounding housescrumble into the two story deep sink -hole that the city allowed to be dug three doors down the street from me. William B. Jones 243 31st Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 • • January 10, 2005 VIA FACSIMILE: 310-372-6186 And Email: rmorgan@hermosabch.org Richard D. Morgan, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Re: Hearing before the City Council of Hermosa Beach on January 11, 2005 to consider the Street Lighting Reduction Test Project Dear Mr. Morgan: I live at 2918 The Strand, Hermosa Beach which is at 30th Place and Hermosa Avenue. I am in receipt of the public notice of the above hearing and I have the following comments: 1. The test should be terminated and the lights turned back on for the following reasons: a. Hermosa Avenue north of 27th Street has not been a well lighted area, even before the lighting reduction experiment went into effect. The street lamps north of 27th Street are single lamps and when alternate street- lamps are not lighted the alley and the sidewalk adjacent to Hermosa Avenue as well as Hermosa Avenue become dark and dangerous. The street lamps south of 27th Street on Hermosa Avenue have double lamps. b. The alley, sidewalks adjacent to Hermosa Avenue and the automobile driving street of Hermosa Avenue are in use not only during the day but at night as well. By night I mean after sunset and before sunrise. I also want to call to your attention that the area on Hermosa Avenue north of 27th Street also contains a bicycle path. With the street lights not giving sufficient illuminate, such as exists south of 27th Street, the affected area is dark and makes joggers, bicycle riders, walkers and automobile drivers uncomfortable because of the darkness and shadows that exist. The lack of adequate lighting has resulted in many joggers and bike riders, women as well as men, jogging and riding their bikes in the middle of the automobile driving street, going against traffic at night. c. I leave my home at approximately 5AM each business day and I have personally observed the conditions that I have described. The result of the lighting reduction, in my opinion, has resulted in a very dangerous condition to exist. The city cannot rely upon the exterior lighting of buildings adjacent to Hermosa Avenue giving sufficient lighting because not every house has exterior lighting facing Hermosa Avenue and none of them have been designed to provide proper lighting for the street. Richard D. Morgan, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Hermosa Beach January 10, 2005 Page 2 • • 2. I would vote for increasing the Lighting/Landscaping District assessment to cover the additional cost of providing adequate lighting. Very truly yours, Arthur Mazirow 3415 Sepulveda Boulevard Penthouse Los Angeles, CA 90034 Phone: 310-255-6114 Fax: 310-390-4042 Email: am@ffslaw.com AM:mf 437890-1 City of Hermosa Beach Department of Public Works ATTN: Richard D. Morgan, P.E. Director of Public Works January 9,2005 RE: Reduction of street lighting In bagging the steet lights, I feel that the city is being penny- -wise and pound foolish. This year we have been very lucky not to have had the usual thick ground -hugging fogs that we have had in the past. However, has the city considered the liability if there is an accident and the complaint is that they could not see where they were going because there were no lights? My house is located in a section of the alley where two lights in a row have.been bagged. Because of the hill and the taller homes around me I feel that I am living in a black hole. While it is nice to be able to stargaze on clear nights I would be willing to pay a small yearly assessment. This would also lower my monthly light bill as I now have to turn on some outside lights and leave them on all night. I noticed that my neighbors were also doing the same thing. I have also heard comments by some of my neighbors that they did not feel as safe when walking after dark. Thank you, Donna Cox 348 - 28th St. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310-379-1457 Rick Morgan • • From: JLach@lacountyda.org Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 7:29 AM To: Rick Morgan Subject: Street Lighting Reduction Test Project (corrected memo) Importance: High As a Hermosa Beach homeowner, taxpayer, and resident for over 13 years, I wish to protest the continuation of the Street Lighting Reduction Test Project. I am writing this email because I am unable to attend the January 11, 2005, City Council meeting; however, I want to make my objections known and hope this email will be passed along to the appropriate decision -makers. I live at 521 31st Street (west of Valley) and have been adversely affected by the street lighting reduction. I work in downtown Los Angeles and leave and come back from work early in the morning (5 am) and late at night (6:30 pm) when it is dark. My alley light on 31st Place by my car garage has been eliminated, causing me (as a lone woman traveler) to fear for my personal safety from possible assailants hiding in the bushes in the alley or following me home. At times, I also take the pre -dawn bus to downtown and have to walk along the now darkened 400 block of 31st Street, again in fear of my safety from traffic, assailants, animals (cats, raccoons, possums) or debris. I will pay any assessment amount to get the lights turned back on!!! It is a matter of my personal safety. Furthermore, as an attorney, I know that the City will face the prospect of civil liability should anything happen to me because of the lack of proper lighting. Accordingly, I urge those in charge to reinstate the lighting as a matter of public safety. Sincerely, JoAnn.Lach (tel. 310 374-1102). 1 1-6-05 I'm grateful for thi irst opportunity to PROTEST the decreased lighting in the. • • - ea of m residence 2840 The Strand. I'm co ced this also: decreases �"� basic se ; ty in d' proportion any ecrease in lighting.' .-, g oermosaeac� �rf ora ' . �: "x 1 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS If ourbudget is strained, there have to be any number of other ways tosave„ money which= have` less potential"impact . on the security of all our- tiny' city:'=S.c:Pt �9tso • iron citizens.���'�EASE NOTE THAT IF A SINGES CITIZEN,IS MUGGED, OR ROBBED,;.ORMOLESTED AIN DE ANY WAY ARE WHICH MIGHT H � VELA Fi �woa LIGHTING BEEN TOTALLY . 4ALL PLEASE ACCEPT THIS AS MY VOTE AND AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE MY ASSESSMENT SO AS TO REINSTATE THE LIGHTING LE .- - J ' :0 : • :0 1: • � • r • .2 • • • _ RsTHE . a - �'' e R C ka �. ,' a. •....-- -aid. 3a.L.;r --t:.1 e•+* •1Y,,:}H•�;C'j.->. -a.."-� F - . i. STREET LIGHTING REDUCTION TEST PROJECT `• `- �I' m age �8 8; vi so,. attendance at ,,the. City Council , meeting. where thusmatter y, is to . be�•discusse&ls, problematical,~ for me BUT: it you- decide,,,that,�it, ,iso essential wM1 \"W=�A'S "BEING DISCUSSED:* }. _ ri !"):=:147-:1! e.�th' c�e, :ttKM; iYI••:attewl ust; call,,- ant',t61.1-'me=,.0fs....and I,,�1;,managextd � PLEASE PLACE''.MY4,g VOTE FOR REINSTATEMENT F ; THE' FORMER.: M1,1,...,0' • D EQUA ►' IGHTING ...:. The City Council • will: ''' LEVEL.- THROUG : e iAi-" RM O 4' 0 CA` - $ "i `aT ank.•: y �, = --,4.--A' ?''y44r '^ i` a ltg-34.1' .D a, yY,4, Si r , s e of r 'a: =• "'9 1 ,Receiveipubliccommert concernin the eduction `of s t lift in he et starea north'ofip.. t?r��. +� j g, w , ,,ar.ga, i a„q. y�,.es ;+ot a. ki• ts� ' fa ,-.1,4- .) „ T . 27"' -Street and west of Valley Drive and determine if thisstest s • • uld;beterminated and � w .4 ts�,,2 RAQr ; 1• : I S"'' lights turned back: on or to leave lights'offarid.continue this ig ng.re • u ion program?:,./4-e.,,--,f•-.1.•,,s7- ' 3. q• • ,t I},-� sL..t =.u: r','` �+ '+: V st 4,, R w.',4"-'..,-;.;'=:-.:';';`:!, ,.�. 1 W''•`E� .'aa - `+,.. .t=...Sa ....J rt:, �.. � .. �!r�4 e S.? '^,`.x... �y,,,3 +r ,;9`ik 4N.,[ , -,: t..,,1 �« • citywide; and` r_ .t � ;...,_.. 2. Consider directing staff to begin the process of balloting residents. for approval to increase , s'�, , :. their Lighting/Landscaping District assessment by an amount lessthan; $10 per year r :„.';',;•, ' I•'vote,YES: tO.,,this. WHY THIS NOTICE: ortunity to voice your'support or. and/or an increase is assessment. T• o be held at the regular City Council meeting on Tuesday; January 11, 2005 in City. Hall Council•,, ' -Chambers;,1315.VaIley Drive, Hermosa Beach=; CA• 90250The Council meeting begins at 7 00 t; ;p.m..and-this item�is scheduled under Municipal Matterswhich will follow,the Public Hearing �5 , r - X : --:$-:11 ,,a•r ...r '4',.121-• ,}•:.a1 T 2.ej..`C` ...to ' r ` • t1 t _ J`" 4."111'..,'-'f. .: ' matters; which begin_s`at 7:30 p.m - ' f, � 6:4, t -:ice- ' .x-1; ; j z ,,.;�. 'ltts 1,-� t7 .3 wl, +.•• rel# ii rt+-, c' ry,. r ,� r.:i,.S, �'Wr ...ai S -'v ,v: `".G = p I\ t, _ CONTACT: - .:,; 7 �',L 'j1.4,i.� re rs�`y+y'il.+J.i,r•-t%.'�.F�1X 'n '`�i Iy Ex+•SF k. t . 4t( t1,- ' L, - tomi • j11.". t1Y44•,••1-. - ... I :'C ,'It I- .r s . (401:t:., a r,:•. 'r `: s Ttie'City's.contactperson is Richard D: Morgan; P E:,aDirectorof Public;Works;•.310/318�02i1 4, F ? _ � r,�t ;miorgan@herrnosabch.org.• , :.� hr`s J.•.. - •. , �+ rY• LT •xyii 7. -i 1, 1. JE.S'-..`J1f/. v3 3Jv� pit p ib, '.,r• r.,wgb K. Y'. p."i t =� ? .. C-I ,el "I'''i/ 4.- _ • i^:d A. r ' 1 • '?^ IIan' • y dt' P Ilii• C# i Cs;e. p rM ;L. Atyse laemmte 2840 The Strang! 5fermosa Beach, CA 90254-2425 +rho a inumUeri• 3a ' 3~rt -4nt fi'r..`+yy...�aE1t'..�:`9,a•'3,.= a�LY.6..'I.iId-s .{ • fi -..- 1s ". M t4 C17t^ hK' 'ceai '.1?� a,•.� t i ^L%I 44:',V):14 . . . C F '4Y(14i.14i ,. Ut ,-'i}.j•1 t"j •-��.0.e.�+;(ssr.,4f.�- f,t.�... • hrr %c•-! Yr • Re_ itae, s fi 3// y CED JAN 1 1 2005 PUBLIC WORKS es. c4/Are__ al 3/ orn) ork _z- a,yki id;Aez-) • • Original Message From: r f [mailto:rf90254@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 11:26 AM To: City Clerk Subject: Council Meeting - Street Lamps 1/06/05 It seems like this test program has brought this area of the city into a 3rd World status. Luckily, with some neighbors help, we were able to get one the street lamp that was going to be covered, switched with one that was going to remain on. I don't even walk that part of 28th Court anymore at night with the covered one. So unsafe. Run any search on-line about "street lamp safety" and police departments around the world always suggest parking one's. vehicle under a street lamp or how lighting is of safety. For years the sign at Valley Park was unlit. Was it really necessary to have 3 lights shining on it after the park's renovation? For the amount I pay for street lighting, I would prefer the street ones remained on. And for months, the one on the left was just pointed towards the ground. One morning I had woken up quite early, I drove along the Green Belt to the Redondo Beach post office on Catalina to get something in the mail. I couldn't believe how many lamps I saw between Pier Avenue and 8th Street on both sides. Some poles even had lamps on each side. These were just parking areas, not where residents live. Is it really necessary to have every lamp on in the parking lot area of the old Pier Avenue School all night long? Isn't there some type of sensor to turn the lamps on at dusk and then a timer to shut them off? How much money would be saved between 12 midnight and the morning right in that one parking lot? Activities at the center cease before midnight, and that would be if a show was in the theater that night. One council meeting aired on cable, I heard JR relate how the city is like a business. So why isn't it run like one? I worked for PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES in the early 1980s. PLAYBOY had lost their all gambling interest which make up a high percentage of the company's profits. I received a 22.5% pay cut. How many city salaries have just been frozen or rolled back? I am always reading where the airlines are cutting salaries. Our city manager should lead the example of big businesses and volunteer to cut his salary. Use the saved funds for the residents' security of keeping the street lamps on. The street lamp at the southeast corner of 27th/Manhattan Ave was covered but the one at the northwest comer remained on. The covered one so near the dangerous pullout from Ozone Court. The northwest corner one has the 3 stories apartment building there with ample outside lighting all night. Seemed like there was no logic in the covering of lamps. Nope, the experiment of covering the lamps didn't work. Come up with some other solutions than dimming the lamps in the residential areas. Ron Felsing Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION NOVEMBER, 2004 MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT NUMBER OF PERMITS TYPE OF ACTIVITY CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE BUILDING 58 52 270 308 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 25 32 163 195 ELECTRIC 22 29 122 159 PLAN CHECK 29 21 127 107 SEWER USE 4 0 9 4 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 38 19 148 152 PARKS & RECREATION 1 0 1 1 IN LIEU PARKS &REC 5 0 10 5 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 0 SIGN REVIEW 1 1 7 8 FIRE FLOW FEES 15 4 43 40 DETERMINATION 0 0 0 0 _LEGAL ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 4 1 7 6 COMMERCIAL INSPECTION 0 0 1 0 TOTALS 202 159 FEES COLLECTED 908 985 TYPE OF FEE CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE. BUILDING $46,680.79 $17,150.97 $150,821.82 $162,447.69 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 2,713 2,446.40 18,356 17,892.40 ELECTRIC 3,379 4,166 17,272 26,457 PLAN CHECK 33,091.60 9,592.60 127,750.19 100,552.20 SEWER USE 2,467.25 0 5,934.09 4,177.51 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 1,976 950 7,573.40 7,600 PARKS & RECREATION 3,500 0 3,500 3,500 IN LIEU PARKS & REC 20,653 0 48,239 17,188 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 0 SIGN REVIEW 107 103 741 824 FIRE FLOW FEES 18,514 4,408 43,816 35,976 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 195 38 310 228 COMMERCIAL INSPECTION 0 0 225 0 TOTALS $133,276.64 $38,854.97 $424,538.50 $376,842.80 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2004 TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS DWELLING UNITS VALUATION 1 101 NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES DETACHED 10 10 $3,375,603.61 2 102 NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES ATTACHED 1 2 $565,045.05 3 103 NEW TWO FAMILY BUILDINGS 4 104 NEW 3 OR 4 FAMILY BUILDINGS 5 105 NEW 5 OR MORE FAMILY BUILDINGS 6 213 NEW HOTELS/MOTELS 7 214 NEW OTHER NON HOUSEKEEPING 8 318 NEW AMUSEMENT & RECREATION 9 319 NEW CHURCHS/OTHER 10 320 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS 11 321 NEW PARKING GARAGES. 12 322 NEW SERVICE STATIONS/REPAIR GARAGES 13 323 NEW HOSPITALS/OTHER INSTITUTIONAL 14 324 NEW OFFICES/BANKS 15 325 NEW PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITY BUILDINGS 16 326 NEW SCHOOLS/OTHER EDUCATIONAL 17 327 NEW STORES/OTHER MERCH BLDGS. 18 328 NEW OTHER NON RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS 19 329 NEW STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BUILDING 5 $97,000 20 434 ADD/ALTER DWELLING/POOLS 31 $493,102.99 21 437 ADD/ALTER NON RESIDENTIAL 3 $10,800 22 438 RESIDENTIAL GARAGES/CARPORTS 23 645 DEMOLITION -SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES 4 4 $2,000 24 646 DEMO 2 -FAMILY BUILDINGS 1 2 $500 25 647 DEMO 3-4 FAMILY BUILDINGS 26 648 DEMO 5+ FAMILY BUILDINGS 27 649 DEMO ALL OTHER BUILDINGS 55 $4,544,051.65 TOTAL UNITS ADDED FY 2004-05 TO DATE: 27 TOTAL UNITS DEMOLISHED/LOST FY TO DATE: 28 (See Attached List) TOTAL NET UNITS FY TO DATE: -1 FY 2002-03 Total New Dwelling Units: 59 Total Demolished Units: 59 Net Units: 0 2 FY 2003-04 Total New Dwelling Units: 58 Total Demolished Units: 63 Net Units: -5 • Dwelling Units Demolished/Lost as of November, 2004 • ADDRESS TYPE PERMIT DATE PERMIT No. No. OF UNIT 619 10th Street SFR 7/13/04 B04-342 1 111 34th Street 2 -Unit Apartment 7/28/04 604-379 2 3116 The Strand SFR 8/9/04 B04-392 1 226 31st Street SFR 8/18/04 B04-416 1 634 7th Street SFR 9/9/04 B04-451 1 602 Manhattan Avenue SFR 9/14/04 604-457 1 2232 Hermosa Avenue Duplex 9/15/04 B04-460 2 2844 El Oeste Street SFR 9/23/04 B04-477 1 1255 10th Street SFR 9/28/04 604-487 1 430 Longfellow Avenue SFR 9/29/04 804-488 1 434 Longfellow Avenue SFR 9/29/04 804-489 1 817-819 6th Street Duplex 10/6/04 B04-522 2 315 Hopkins Avenue SFR 10/7/04 B04-523 1 1849 Valley Park Avenue SFR 10/11/04 B04-529 1 598 1st Street SFR 10/11/04 604-530 1 232 1st Court Duplex 10/18/04 604-545 2 92 16th Street SFR 10/27/04 B04-570 1 1802 Rhodes Street SFR 10/28/04 B04-580 1 321 Monterey Blvd. Duplex 11/1/04 B04-586 2 1212 Loma Drive SFR 11/3/04 604-593 1 706 24th Place SFR 11/18/04 604-617 1 216 33rd Place SFR 11/18/04 B04-618 1 245 33rd Street SFR 11/18/04 604-624 1 Total Units Demolished 28 • • December 6, 2004 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of Regular Meeting of January 11, 2005 HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION NOVEMBER, 2004 STAFF REPORT PREPARED i t ' SUB,lECT ' ,• THIS 11AON• THISMONTH LAST EY, _ FY TO' . DATE ' LAST FY. TO DATE, APPEAL / RECONSIDERATION 0 0 3 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) - CONDOMINIUMS 2 2 10 8 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) - COMMERCIAL 0 0 0 2 C.U.P./PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 4 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 0 0 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MAP EXTENSION 0 0 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 0 0 FINAL MAP 1 1 5 10 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 0 3 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 0 0 0 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 0 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 0 0 4 5 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 0 1 1 PARKING PLAN 0 0 0 1 SPECIAL STUDY 0 0 0 0 SUBDIVISION 0 0 0 0 TEXT AMENDMENT 1 2 4 10 TRANSIT 0 0 1 1 VARIANCE 0 1 2 3 ZONE CHANGE 0 0 0 3 MISCELLANEOUS 5 6 21 26 TOTAL REPORTS PREPARED 9 12 56 80 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP rv, ,; - . .• .-,:.%.-0 k r" [• : `, P SENGERS •A {__ _ ; y T TH` ." ..11./1.2.N:1.4.,,,,,,.. THisMoNTH -,,a, T kt s - FY Tot,-; sz.. DATE1 i; .LAST FYt fTo DATE. HERMOSA BEACH 604 596 3,656 3,946 REDONDO BEACH 3,233 3,961 19,829 24,768 SATELLITE 318 345 1,627 1,750 *Ridership number is counted using different method. 4 CONCUR: Sol Blumenfeld Dir: tor Community De elopment Department Stephen City Manager f:\b95\cd\activity Respectfully submitted, itc- Yu-Ying Tin Administrative Assistant December 7, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 11, 2005 Department of Community Resources Activity Report for November 2004 The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of November 2004: Recreation Programming: - Winter session classes continued to run full to registration capacity. Recreation Classes of & Programs Many of the dance classes began rehearsals for their end of session dance recitals this month. The "Teen Extreme" program expanded to include Mondays increasing the total number of participants to 56. The most favored activity for adults was the 4th Annual Hermosa Beach Open with 120 participants. Special Events: Veterans Memorial Service South Bay veterans along with the City of Hermosa Beach held memorial services with special guest speaker who was a Prisoner of War for a number of years during the Vietnam War. Activities included: choral performance, speeches by community leaders, and a police/fire honor guard. Election Day Community Center classrooms and the Clark Building served as an all -day voting station for the municipal election. Beach Cities Toy Drive In coordination with the Woman's Club and High Five Boutique the annual holiday Toy Drive was held at Sangria restaurant on Sunday evening to raise monetary funds and collect toy donations. Co -Ed Sand Football Tournament Co -Ed 4 -on -4 flag football tournament was held at 10`h Street. The tournament is sponsored by the Community Resources Department and directed by Chris Jahng. Sixty participants enjoyed recreational flag football. World Aids Day South Bay Family Health Care Center held this annual event on pier plaza. Festivities included live entertainment, motivational speakers, dramatic readings, and information booths. Excursions: Reagan Library Tour The trip began with a traditional White House luncheon served on china with linens. Following the luncheon excursion guests enjoyed a guided tour highlighting the events that molded Ronald Reagan's character, rediscover the 1980's and the world that President Reagan shaped during his eight years in the oval office. On the tour was an exact replica of the Oval Office and a piece of the Berlin Wall. Price included transportation, luncheon and guided tour. Fifty-three registrants attended the excursion and one excursion host. Film Permits: Project Dates Feature -D -War November 1 Still Photo -Blue Cactus November 11 Civic Theater Events: Film Days 1 1 Fees Charged November 10,11,13 ' Saptha Bhumi, Sri Lankan Cultural Association, held rehearsals and . performances. Total attendance was 500 for all 3 days November 15 King Harbor Church, Redondo Beach, held two showings of the film Noah's Arc with a total attendance of 250 for both showings November 18-20 Mentors In Motion, a non-profit organization held rehearsals and performances of 'At the Lincoln Center' to an audience of 150 November 21 Hype Studio, Hermosa Beach, held a winter dance recital featuring various dance styles for youth 18 and under to a full house of 500 November 14,21,28 Church of Christ held religious services utilizing 8 classrooms and the theater. Over 500 were in attendance for each rental day Fees Waived November 3 Sandpiper Debs held a monthly meeting in the 2nd Story Theatre. (2) 10.00 Hermosa Arts Foundation Facility Usage: 50 Hours November 2-8 Civic Light Opera of South Bay conducted load out activities and performances of the "Around the World in a Bad Mood" (35) November 22 Hermosa Arts Foundation Meeting (2) November 29-30 Kings and Clowns in Training conducted load in and rehearsals for their performance of "A Christmas Carol" (13) Community Center Gymnasium Fees Charged Total Hours Private Rental 10.00 Kennedy O'Regan, Adult Basketball 10.00 John Fielder, Adult Basketball 8.00 Oscar Rivera, Adult Basketball 4.50 Emiliano Ortiz, Adult Basketball 6.00 Fred Zaguski, Adult Basketball 4.50 Mike Aaker, Adult Basketball 2.00 Steve Kingdon, Adult Basketball 8.00 Ron Price, Adult Basketball 6.00 David Gordon, Adult Basketball 8.00 John Thuotte, Adult Basketball 1.50 Park Lee, Adult Basketball 2.00 Rick Wood, Adult Basketball 10.00 Paul White, Adult Basketball 8.00 Simon Katchadourain, Basketball 88.50 Total Hours Fees Charged Fees Waived 20.00 ARC 8.00 Easter Seals 14.00 Hermosa Beach Fire Department 42.00 Total Hours Fess Waived Community Center Tennis Courts Total Hours Private Rental 54.00 Jeff Abbey 74.75 Adam Burt 30.00 Mike Campagna 8.00 Rick Escalante 39.50 Dave Mahoney 24.00 Scott Smith 37.00 Joe Testa 48.00 Tennis Tournament 21.00 Resident Reservations 336.25 Total Hours Fees Charged *Public court use outside of reserved time is first come first serve Clark Complex Clark Building Rentals 77.00 Private Rentals Athletic Field Public Skate Hours 174.00 AYSO 172.00 Hermosa Beach Little League Community Center Room Rentals Private Rentals Rentals 423.50 Community Center Rooms Lease Agreements Public Skate Hours ARC Rooms 1, 2 & 15 (Not available for rent) Easter Seals Room 4 (Not available for rent) South Bay Youth Project Room 6A (Not available for rent) Skate Track Hours Rentals 0.00 Private Rentals 144.00 Public Skate Hours Valley Park Picnic Reservations Hours Rental 103.00 20 Resident Bookings 204.00 AYSO South Park No Fee Hours Rental 12.00 Private Rental 16.00 Adult Flag Football League 12.00 Youth Volleyball League Upcoming Events: December 31 January 1 January 23 February 7 February 13 February 21 February 26 February 27 New Year's Eve Celebration Rose Parade Excursion Palm Springs Outlet and Casino Excursion Registration for Spring Classes Begins Adult Softball Begins Spring Session of Recreation Classes Begins Bear Mountain Ski Trip Excursion , 515t Annual Sand & Strand • • DEPARTMENT REVENUE FOR NOVEMBER 2003 Current This Month Fiscal Year Last Year Month Last Fiscal Year To Date To Date $46,554 $28,779 $391,937 $356,672 Revenue FY 2004-05 for 42% of the Fiscal Year is: $391,937 or 59% of the projected figure of $663,950 Donations (in addition to Department Revenue): $450.00 Expenditures FY 2004-05 for 42% of the Fiscal Year is: $390,476 or 39% of the projected figure of $1,013,593.00 Respectfully Submitted, Concur: Chris Valente Lisa Lynn Administrative Assistant Community Resources Director Stephe City anager rre • Donor • 04-05 Donations Event Date Amount 24 Hour Fitness Sunset Concerts Jul -04 $2,500.00 FW Magazine Sunset Concerts Jul -04 $10,000.00 Vineyard Bank Sunset Concerts Jul -04 $10,000.00 Wells Fargo Community Support Campaign Teen Program Supplies Sep -04 $90.00 Wells Fargo Community Support Campaign Teen Program Supplies Sep -04 $30.00 American Express Recreation Programs Oct -04 $75,000.00 Hermosa Beach Women's Club Holiday Events Nov -04 $450.00 $98,070.00 vers have strong . ailt :' rmosa Beach 'r'e: ... -lament showcased of .-st talent in southern : ornia ' ii::o many local play - Joshua Rosen of Manhattan Beach placed second in the Boys 8 Singles, Shuhei Shibahara finished second in the Boys 12 Singles, and Ryan Sass of Manhattan Beach beat Chance Finley of Hermosa Beach to win the Boys 16 Singles championship. In the girls divisions, Sarah Gong of Hermosa Beach finished second to Gardena's Melanie Scott in the Girls 12 Singles, Caitlin Bartlett of Palos Verdes Estates won the Girls 14 Singles, and Julie Chung of Torrance was runner-up in the Girls 16 Singles division: , HERMOSA BEACH -, Pier Plaza to host' World AIDS Day The South Bay's annual :observation of World ;AIDS, Day will be held at Herriiosa Beach's Pier Plaza on Sunday at 1 p.m., presented by :the , South Bay AIDS Network; The event, designed to, raise AIDS awareness, brings .various service groups to,the plaza to provide information and answer questions for,the public. A candlelight vigil will be held at 5:30 p.m. at the nearby Hermosa Beach Pier to conclude the event. The official World AIDS Day is Dec. 1, and this year's theme is Women, Girls, HIV and AIDS, to reflect an increase in the HIV rate among females. 4th Annual Hermosa beach Open tennis tournament,; finals this weekend - With the junior events now sanc- tioned by the USTA, the fall version of the Hermosa Beach Open tennis tour- nament features some of the top play- ers from the Los Angeles area. The event concludes Saturday and Sunday at the Hermosa Beach Community Center, 710 Pier Ave. • Divisions include Men's Singles & Doubles - Open, 5.0, 4.5, 4.0, 3.5;_ Women's Singles & DoublesT B, C; Mixed Doubles - B, C; Boy's & Girl's Satellite Singles & Doubles - 8, 10, 12, 14and 16. Tennis Fourth Annual Hermosa • Beach Open'': Terinis- ' Championships. Fall Tennis Championships today and i tomorrow at the Community Center Tennis Oourts:1 `.Contact: (310) 798-3939 or adam@adambuit.coni.'v`; ' ■ World AIDS Day World AIDS Day will be observed from 1'to` 5 p:m�;Sunday, Nov. 28, at the Hermosa Beach; Pier„with an evening of :presentations, poetp' . entertainment, informational booths and free;- HIV.anonymous testing followed by a cand1eS. light vigil at 5:30 p.m. For more inforniationzi call Robert Rojas at 318-2521, Ext. 236.• • ■ World AIDS Day. World AIDS Day will be observed from 5 p.tn: Sunday, Nov. 28, at the Hermosa Beach Pier, with an evening of presentations, poetry; entertainment, informational booths and free HIV anonymous testing followed by a candle:,,'; light vigil at 5:30 p.m. For more information. call Robert Rojas at 318-2521, Ext. 236. World AIDS Day Celebration of Life. Hermosa Beach Pier. 1 to_ 5 p.ni: 318-2521 x236. • With the junior events now sanc- tioned by the USTA, the fall version of the Hermosa Beach Open tennis tourna- ment will feature some of the top play- ers from the Los Angeles area. The event scheduled for the weekends of Nov. 13- 14 and 20-21 at the Hermosa Beach Community Center, 710 Pier Ave. Divisions include Men's Singles & Doubles - Open, 5.0, 4.5, 4.0, 3.5; Women's Singles & Doubles - 8, C; Mixed Doubles - B, C; Boy's & Girl's Satellite Singles & Doubles - 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16. Fees are $30/$25 for resident dis- count for singles and $35/530 resident discount for doubles. Entry deadline is Thursday, Nov. 4 at 6 p.m. Sign-ups are available on-line at www.usta.com using the tournament ID# 651701604 and at http://www.adarnburt.com. Entry forms are also available at the Hermosa Beach Community Center. AIDS day observed A South Bay 'observance of World AIDS Day takes place 1.to 5 p.m. Sunday, Nov. 28 with poetry, information booths and free anonymous_HIy testing at the foot of the Hermosa Beach Pier. A candlelight -vigil .will;#ollow at 5:30 -p.m. ,.`. For more information':call 318-2521 ext. 236. Sunday; Nova 28 Commemorating World.AIDS.Day 2004 Hent The South Bay Annual world AIDS Day entitled 'A Celebration of Life ;will be held from 1 5 p.m. at the Hermosa Beacb'Pier Head. There will : be entertainment, poetry, present tions, information booths and free HIV anonymous testing. The day 'will conclude with a candlelight vigil at 5:30 p.m. More info: (310) 318-2521 ext. 236. • 1 AIDS Day observed A South Bay observance of the 16th annual World AIDS Day takes. place 1 to 5 p.m. Sunday, :Nov.28 with poetry, information booths •and free, anony- mous HIV testing at the foot of the Hermosa Beach Pier.::'A candlelight -vigil will follow at 5:30 p:m. The event is organiied by the South Bay AIDS Network. For more informa- tion call 318-2521 ext. 236. Co -Ed 4on4c beach. co-regist. dom via mum of t Register e. : •Immunity Center or on-site • day at the . 1);:c.ctor: Chris Jhang (310) i77- 3148. 9 a.t .. at ICth Street and the Strand- Fees: d15 per player S20 per player on game day. For more information, call 1310) 318-0280. Arnament : ;irk) flag football on welcome, male/female • All teams picked at ran - .^.•s are guaranteed a Mini•_: ;, 3tration is open until filled: Women's Flag Football on the sands of Hermosa Beach - The final Women's Flag Football Tournament of the year will be held. at 10 a.m. Saturday in Hermosa Beach. . ' The 'cost of the five -on -five, passing only, no contact tournament is $150 per. team if pre -registered and $175 the day of the tournament. Registration as a team is a must, with a maximum of 10 players per team. Check in is from 9- 9:30 a.m. the day of the tournament. For information, visit www.pranlanon- key.org. . 'l nti'.:; ® Free surf film The \Vest Coast premiere of the surf_:fiElm,: ti. "Noah's Arc" will be shown at 6 and 9;p;m:. Monday, Nov. 15, at the Hermosa Playhouse 710 Pier Ave. Some of the surfers in theFilm and the producer will be in attendance.:] Admission is free; ._ ;d Old Skool South Bay Local photographers: Robi Hutas and JW Milleiy ill present their photography exhibition entitled,''.Old Skool South Bay' at Hermosa Beach lGwaniiClub, 2515 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach. Come to_theii opening reception tonight from 7.10 p.m. The.eihi;:, bition will continue through Nov. 14. - ¢ -Sign u • Women's Flag Football on the beach The final Women's Flag Football Tournament of the year will be held at 10 a.m. on Saturday, Nov. 20 in Hermosa Beach. The cost of the five -on -five, passing only, no contact tournament is $150 per team if pre -registered and $ 175 the day of the tournament. Registration as a team is a must, with a maximum of 10 players per team. Check in is from 9-9:30 a.m. the day of the tournament. For information, visit www.prankmon- key.org. ER Little League season The Hermosa Beach Little Leagile has ongoing registration for its 2005 baseball, girls' softball and Pony season. Rates are.discounted for registration through Dec. 15. Tryouts will be held in January. For more information, call 372-6916. • k,' Monday; =Nov 15 s ' ti Free,Suri film :. ;_ ... .: From the film; makers who brought .j U1. the acclaimed surf frini :'The Outsiders are, now,proud to release the West Coast Premier of 'NoahsArc Sec highquality surf footage of world•eiass?urfers; including 2001 World Champion CJ Hobgood Jesse' i! H;nei, Damien'Hobgood, and Matt BeachamsMeet Pro-surfers'arid the Producer Brian Jn e�-k how this must see film was made Tvo sn s 6 'y and 9 p.m: at Hermosa Pla`yHouse,',710`)' r Awe Heiviosa Beach.Free gifts'Free pia:(6i ing only)._Free to all. Co-ed Dodgeball on the beach Tournament set for Saturday Get ready to jump, slide, dodge, duck, throw, catch and humble on the sand as a co-ed Dodgeball on the Beach Tournament comes to Hermosa Saturday. Held at 10th Street and The Strand, games in the blind -draw tournament culminate with the winners bombarding players of the losing team with a barrage of water balloons. Teams will be instructed on tourna- ment specific rules at registration and prior to commencement of the games. Day of event registration and check in is from 9:30 a.m. to 10 a.m.; with games beginning promptly at 10:15 a.m. Late entries may be placed on a waiting list. To ensure even teams, participants are asked to sign up with an opposite sex co -entry. Cost of the tournament is $15 per person if pre -registered and $20 the day of the event: Registration forms may be picked up at the Hermosa Beach Community Center,. 710 Pier Ave. ER ;;; ' Sports.editof; RANDY ANGEL;: eanbe reached at randy@easyreadeyifio ■ Hermosa Garden Club The Hermosa Garden Club will meet at:10'a:m. Wednesday;'Nov. 17, at Clark •Stai#it in 861 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach: There will be a presentation by a representative of Tree'People. For more information, call Diane -at 530:6992. • ermosa Beach SCANNING UR CITIES HERMOSA BEACH Kiwanis to open Christmas tree lot Kicking off its 18th year, the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club 1 tree lot will open Friday. All proceeds benefit charities such as 1736 House, Project Touch and Richstone Center in Hawthorne. The club plans a luncheon and tra- ditional "Blessing of the Trees" onWednesday. Located at Pier Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway, the lot offers 2,000 trees as well as a selection of wreaths, garlands and door swags. The lot will be open seven days a week from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. until Dec. 23. Remembering the veterans Andy Johns of Redondo Beach lights a candle during a Veterans Day mony last Thursday night in Hermosa Beach. (photo by Darryl • 1 sr'41, t'r ette (above) holds a candle with f his mom Bev at Hermosa's annu- erans -Day ceremony last Thursday at ...e . . e etgans Memorial on the east lawn of ,{1.,.., . •- N Ali'e3Hil1f1osa Beach Community Center. At 0...itlint•L4.-:`,4•,--,,., tr,.,r) the flame burning from <4 s. • • Kris Kovac was Slim Jim and Miles Gretsky :lressed as his clad Neil at the Hertnosa Valley Halloween Festival. Photo by Elisa Losson tet• . Patric): Compton was Papa Smurf. Photo by, Elisa Losson Lauren LeBlanc sho'.'s her darker side in the Haunted House at the Hermosa Valley School Hallowerill Festival. Photo by Rob Fulcher _.„ .3, ;•:<: --, • • :1 ileY .5iiidents strikea very sayy pose Hallow. ein'tht doWn. Picture.d oeb to a,e Charlie Hoffrrtart: :David Rerdt,',Rtiquel Pei 1 in, .irin:er Delh, Ch, R'pepan ,McNamee, • Riley Ramirez, Georgia Mizell, Aa 9, Back, 1:ick hew: One -woman show charms audience Rene Foss takes off in 'Around the World in a Bad Mood: Con- fessions of a Flight Attendant' at the Hermosa Playhouse. • • Inc Foss and her one - woman show, "Around the World in a Bad Mood: Confessions of a Flight Attendant," has touched down at the Hermosa Beach Playhouse for a two-week lav - over. If "Coffee. Tea, or Me" was a tantalizin_ peek behind the first-class curtain of the glam- orous life of flight attendants, Foss brims those high -flying fantasies down to Earth for a three-point landing. Overbearing pilots, trash, rude passengers, trash, unfashionable and uncomfortable uniforms, trash and, oh, yeah, more trash is the focus here. An "F/A's" job is a dirty job and it takes more than poise, charm and sensible shoes to survive. He or she must be armed with wit, humor and a toothy grin that can withstand any passenger's degrading abuse. Renaissance woman Foss is a review by Kent Stoddart ters that never fall into stereo;:: type. Her pi passengers aid. attendants are rger than a 747; yet they are grounded with an in rightful truth that leaves the au T. dience guffawing. "Being a flight`.. attendant is much like being waitress on a Greyhound bus -; with no tips," she quips. ' Though Foss sharply pokes fun. at her profession, there is 'an un- - dercurrent of love and respect that:, floats past the footlightst\and: charms her audience, particularly;;: the presently employed and retiigd, attendants who filled the seats'at::' last Sunday's matinee perform ance. The author/performer edu s` cates her audience on attendant;` hand signals, terminology;? acronyms, subtext, life lessons; and what to pack: Travel light. :.:w1 Director Ross Myerson has: Foss moving like her plane was; delayed, and she might miss here:, connecting flight. The sho i4. moves at a brisk pace and Foss;is oftentimes left catching her breath. Costume changes and musical transitions are.: masked with satiric air- line video presentation"s t, and clips of Foss' aspic,*F_ ing acting career – she .. played a doomed flight; attendant on "As °tlie�` World Turns" Her showW; has been successfully produced in Minneapolis and New York as well as other malorir;. cities. . Foss comes well-equipped toy the West Coast to present' herr, show — with poise, charm, senf, sible shoes, big smile and a': sparkle in her eye that is full of mischief. writer, actor and 20- year veteran flight attendant who pulls no punches. She has penned a clever, insightful and satiric look at one of the most unappreciated and demanding jobs in the serv- ice industry. From the interview and training process to some sur- real first flights around the United States, Foss creates an array of broadly painted charac- !1 `Around the World in a Bad Mood' "Around the World in a Bad Mood" will be pre- sented by the Civic Light Opera of South Bay Cities through Nov. 7 at the Hermosa Beach Playhouse, 710 Pier Ave., Hermosa Beach. Show times are 8 p.m. Tuesday through Satur- day; 2 and 7 p.m. Sunday. Tickets range from S35 to 545. Call 372-4477 for more information. r • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, NOVEMBER 2004 January 3, 2005 City Council Meeting of January 11, 2005 STATISTICAL SECTION Finance Administration CURRENT MONTH • THIS'MONTH:- LAST F 1 FISCAL YEAR'_ • TO' DATE 'LAST FISCAL .YR TO DATE AVERAGE'T.OT. OCCUPANCY RATE INVOICES/ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE CASH REGISTER - TRANSACTIONS CHECKS ISSUED -- 78.2% 75.8% (7/1/04-9/30/04 (7/1/04-9/30/04 Reporting Period) Reporting"Period) 59. -2,334 -' 278 PURCHASE ORDERS 147 DISCOUNTS TAKEN $136:39, LANDSCAPE/ST. LIGHT REBATES (2002 Tax Yr.). UUT EXEMPTIONS (1) 1,419 TO DATE PAYROLL Full Time Employees 130 Part Time Employees 67 1 ,55 .. 2,928 78,:2% 75.8% 404 392 12,842 13,623 282 ' , 1,557 — 1,623 134 765 825 $233.51 • $778.33 $752.68 18 ' 29 (2) 1,384 135 44 f:/b95/finance l /finactivityTOT.doc •• Finance Cashier CURRENT MONTH •. r THIS.4MONTH LAST FY „ F.ISCAu,Y,EAR '3 CITATION :. LAS..T;FISCAL. CITATION PAYMENTS DMV PAYMENTS DELINQUENT NOTICES SENT: California Out of State TOTAL: DISMISSALS BOOTING- REVENUE— PARKING PERMITS: Driveway Guest Party Passes Temp. Res. Passes Contractor Daily Annual Preferential Transferable Vehicle TOTAL: ,• MTA BUS PASSES TAXI VOUCHERS SOLD ' TAXI VOUCHERS USED CASH KEYS'SOLD CASH•KEY REVENUE ANIMAL LICENSES BUSINESS LICENSES Licenses Issued Revenue .3,324 418 1,157 141 1,298_ 269 $897 1 143 0 56 8 33 95 128 y A 2,107 342 µ 18,497 _.� 543 _ .. 83 626 N� $575 2 212 0 38 6 29 47 76 . 12 BUS`STRIKE 450- 332 13- $450, 3$450 79 300 .199 6 $380 93 153 156 $31,932.41 $28,134.14 1,758 - - ,n... 10,174 1,082 11,256 — $21',294 14 2,133 40 254 32 286 637 923 • 1,960 1,476 31 $25,500 , 747 15,862 1;735 8,410 986 ' 9,396 ,✓ , ;1,059 $15,861 7 2,501 465 224 53 299 604 903 13 1,630- .1,208 42 $2,015 698 944 1,109 $242,065.96 $255,835.27 NOTED Step ' tAtifd"W= urre I, City ! anager 2 Respectfully submitted: Viki Copeland, Finance Director f:/b95/finance 1 /finactivityTOT.doc • HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2004 NOVEMBER _,FIRE,STATISTICS THIS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION LAST F/Y FOR EMS MO. LAST F/Y ORIGINAL INSPECTION TO DATE MO. DATE TO DATE COMMERCIAL 72 94 94 483 ASSEMBLY 0 1 0 6 INSTITUTIONS 1 0 1 3 INDUSTRIAL 1 0 1 4 APARTMENTS 23 27 23 106 RE -INSPECTION COMMERCIAL 1 25 24 160 ASSEMBLY 0 0 0 1 INSTITUTIONS 0 0 0 4 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 0 11 APARTMENTS 0 3 1 72 OCCUPANCY LOAD 0 0 0 2 CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 0 5 `i •i1' AMBULANCE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 INV BILL THIS THIS MO. F/Y TO LAST F/Y THIS F/Y TO LAST F/Y FOR EMS MO. LAST F/Y DATE TO DATE MO. DATE TO DATE RES. 38 31 186 173 $10,678 $51,516 $46,883 NON -RES. 20 26 123 89 $11,220 $67,903 $66,543 TOTALS 58 57 309 262 $21,898 $119,419 $113,426 Respectfully Submitted: RUSSELL TINGLEY, FIR CHIEF Noted: STEV :f '4" L, 0 MANAGER Incidents by Day of Week Date Range: From 11/01/2004 To 11/30/2004 28 26 24 22 20 18 Day of the Week Number of Incidents Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 27 25 25 18 18 18 28 yaal yaa� 4s° • e eacm • ,SpA � .ccs • ae.‘ INC014 (3.00) Page 1 of 1 Printed 01/04/2005 at 08:06:03 • • Incidents by Day of Week Date Range: From 01/01/2004 To 11/30/2004 340 320 300 280 260 240 220 200 Day of the Week Number of Incidents Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 325 256 219 229 223 262 288 INC014 (3.00) Page 1 of 1 Printed 01/04/2005 at 08:06:22 • • Incidents by Time of Day Date Range: From 11/01/2004 To 11/30/2004 12 10 8 6 4 2 Time of Day Number of Incidents 00:00:00 to 00:59:59 01:00:00 to 01:59:59 02:00:00 to 02:59:59 03:00:00 to 03:59:59 04:00:00 to 04:59:59 06:00:00 to 06:59:59 07:00:00 to 07:59:59 08:00:00 to 08:59:59 09:00:00 to 09:59:59 10:00:00 to 10:59:59 11:00:00 to 11:59:59 12:00:00 to 12:59:59 13:00:00 to 13:59:59 14:00:00 to 14:59:59 15:00:00 to 15:59:59 16:00:00 to 16:59:59 17:00:00 to 17:59:59 18:00:00 to 18:59:59 19:00:00 to 19:59:59 20:00:00 to 20:59:59 21:00:00 to 21:59:59 22:00:00 to 22:59:59 23:00:00 to 23:59:59 8 5 11 5 2 2 3 6 8 10 10 9 9 11 11 5 9 4 6 6 6 6 7 159 i o° cc) o°o°o°o°o°o°o°cPo°o°o°OC) o°o°o OC) o°ooOC) Q. ^ do 'b• a• 6 A• ° ,c5* Ny...`O• �• °' �°j' 19' ti'`' (Or tib' INC0I5 (3.00) Page 1 of 1 Printed 01/04/2005 at 08:07:00 • • Incidents by Time of Day Date Range: From 01/01/2004 To 11/30/2004 120 100 80 60, 40 20 Time of Day Number of Incidents 00:00:00 to 00:59:59 01:00:00 to 01:59:59 02:00:00 to 02:59:59 03:00:00 to 03:59:59 04:00:00 to 04:59:59 05:00:00 to 05:59:59 06:00:00 to 06:59:59 07:00:00 to 07:59:59 08:00:00 -to 08:59:59 09:00:00 to 09:59:59 10:00:00 to 10:59:59 11:00:00 to 11:59:59 12:00:00 to 12:59:59 13:00:00 to 13:59:59 14:00:00 to 14:59:59 15:00:00 to 15:59:59 16:00:00 to 16:59:59 17:00:00 to 17:59:59 18:00:00 to 18:59:59 19:00:00 to 19:59:59 20:00:00 to 20:59:59 21:00:00 to 21:59:59 22:00:00 to 22:59:59 23:00:00 to 23:59:59 72 71 73 42 23 30 41 47 62 76 87 88 95 105 103 114 94 96 81 97 82 86 75 62 1,802 CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CPCPo°CPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCP'•CP CP INC015 (3.00) Page 1 of 1 Printed 01/04/2005 at 08:07:19 Incident Type Count Report Date Range: From 11/01/2004 To 11/30/2004 Selected Station(s): All Incident Type Description Station: 11 Count 111 - Building fire 3 1.89% 151 - Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 1 0.63% Total - Fires 4 10.53% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 22 13.84% 22 57.89% 460 - Accident, potential accident, other 1 0.63% - Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 1 2.63% 510 - Person in distress, other 1 0.63% Total - Service Call 1 2.63% 600 - Good intent call, other 1 0.63% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 5 3.14% Total - Good Intent Call 6 15.79% 700 - False alarm or false call, other 1 0.63% 730 - System malfunction, other 2 1.26% 731 - Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 1 0.63% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 4 10.53% Total for Station 38 23.90% Station: 1Q1 110 - Structure fire, other 1 0.63% 131 - Passenger vehicle fire 1 0.63% 151 - Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 1 0.63% Total - Fires 3 3.06% 311 - Medical assist, assist EMS crew 2 1.26% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 61 38.36% 3210 - EMS Call on the Strand 2 1.26% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 6 3.77% 3220 - Vehicle accident without injuries 2 1.26% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 73 74.49% 400 - Hazardous condition, other 1 0.63% 411 - Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 2 1.26% 480 - Attempted burning, illegal action, other 1 0.63% Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 4 4.08% 50 - Service call, other 1 0.63% 520 - Water problem, other 1 0.63% 522 - Water or steam leak 2 1.26% 553 - Public service 2 1.26% Total - Service Call 6 6.12% 600 - Good intent call, other 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 1 0.63% 2 1.26% INC065 (3.01) Page 1 of 3 Printed 01/04/2005 08:08:22 • • Incident Type Description Count Station; 101 - (Continued) Total - Good Intent Call _ 3 3.06% 730 - System malfunction, other 2 1.26% 735 - Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 1 0.63% 74 - Unintentional system/detector operation - no fire 2 1.26% 743 - Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 2 1.26% 745 - Alarm system sounded, no fire - unintentional 1 0.63% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 8 8.16% 900 - Special type of incident, other Total - Special Incident Type 1 0.63% 1 1.02% Total for Station 98 61.64% Station: 201 11 - Structure Fire 1 0.63% Total - Fires 1 20.00% 32 - Emergency medical service (EMS) 1 0.63% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 0.63% 3210 - EMS Call on the Strand 1 0.63% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 3 60.00% 571 - Cover assignment, standby, moveup 1 0.63% Total - Service Call 1 20.00% Total for Station 5 3.14% Station: 202 111 - Building fire 1 0.63% Total - Fires 1 20.00% 32 - Emergency medical service (EMS) 1 0.63% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 0.63% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 2 1.26% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 4 80.00% Total for Station 5 3.14% Station: 601 111 - Building fire 1 0.63% Total - Fires 1 16.67% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 5 3.14% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 5 83.33% Total for Station 6 3.77% Station: 901 731 - Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 1 0.63% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 1 100.00% Total for Station 1 0.63% Station: UNK 11 - Structure Fire 1 0.63% 110 - Structure fire, other 1 0.63% 111 - Building fire 1 0.63% 163 - Outside gas or vapor combustion explosion 1 0.63% Total - Fires 4 66.67% 1NC065 (3.01) Page 2 of 3 Printed 01/04/2005 08:08:22 • • Incident Type Description Count Station; UNK - (Continued) 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 0.63% Total - Rescue & Emers;encv Medical Service Incidents 1 16.67% 73 - System or detector malfunction 1 0.63% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 1 16.67% Total for Station 6 3.77% 159 100.00% 1NC065 (3.01) Page 3 of 3 Printed 01/04/2005 08:08:22 • • Incident Type Count Report Date Range: From 01/01/2004 To 11/30/2004 Selected Station(s): All Incident Type Description Count Station: 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 3 0.17% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 3 50.00% 411 - Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 1 0.06% 463 - Vehicle accident, general cleanup 1 0.06% Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 2 33.33% 742 - Extinguishing system activation Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 1 0.06% 1 16.67% Total for Station 6 0.33% Station: 11 100 - Fire, other 1 0.06% 110 - Structure fire, other 2 0.11% 111 - Building fire 12 0.67% 112 - Fires in structures other than in a building 1 0.06% 113 - Cooking fire, confined to container 2 0.11% 142 - Brush, or brush and grass mixture fire 2 0.11% 151 - Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 2 0.11% Total - Fires 22 5.79% 210 - Overpressure rupture from steam, other 1 0.06% Total - Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat - no fire 1 0.26% 311 - Medical assist, assist EMS crew 1 0.06% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 212 11.76% 3210 - EMS Call on the Strand 9 0.50% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 13 0.72% 3220 - Vehicle accident without injuries 2 0.11% 323 - Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Ped) 2 0.11% 331 - Lock -in (if lock out , use 511) 1 0.06% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 240 63.16% 400 - Hazardous condition, other 2 0.11% 440 - Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 3 0.17% 444 - Power line down 4 0.22% 460 - Accident, potential accident, other 2 0.11% 463 - Vehicle accident, general cleanup 2 0.11% 482 - Threat to burn 1 0.06% Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 14 3.68% 510 - Person in distress, other 2 0.11% 520 - Water problem, other 3 0.17% 521 - Water evacuation 1 0.06% 522 - Water or steam leak 1 0.06% 540 - Animal problem, other 1 0.06% 550 - Public service assistance, other 4 0.22% 553 - Public service 8 0.44% 1NC065 (3.01) Page 1 of 5 Printed 01/04/2005 08:08:44 • • Incident Type Description Count Station; 11 - (Continued) 554 - Assist invalid 1 0.06% Total - Service Call 21 5.53% 600 - Good intent call, other 8 0.44% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 40 2.22% 632 - Prescribed fire 1 0.06% 650 - Steam, other gas mistaken for smoke, other 1 0.06% 651 - Smoke scare, odor of smoke 3 0.17% 671 - Hazmat release investigation w/ no hazmat 1 0.06% Total - Good Intent Call 54 14.21% 700 - False alarm or false call, other 6 0.33% 713 - Telephone, malicious false alarm 1 0.06% 730 - System malfunction, other 10 0.55% 731 - Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 1 0.06% 733 - Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 3 0.17% 735 - Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 1 0.06% 743 - Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 1 0.06% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 23 6.05% 812 - Flood assessment 1 0.06% Total - Severe Weather & Natural Disaster 1 0.26% 900 - Special type of incident, other 2 0.11% 911 - Citizen complaint 2 0.11% Total - Special Incident Type 4 1.05% Total for Station 380 21.09% Station: 101 100 - Fire, other 1 0.06% 110 - Structure fire, other 1 0.06% 111 - Building fire 8 0.44% 112 - Fires in structures other than in a building 1 0.06% 113 - Cooking fire, confined to container 3 0.17% 114 - Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue 1 0.06% 118 - Trash or rubbish fire, contained 6 0.33% 131 - Passenger vehicle fire 2 0.11% 142 - Brush, or brush and grass mixture fire 1 0.06% 150 - Outside rubbish fire, other 1 0.06% 151 - Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 3 0.17% 154 - Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire 1 0.06% 161 - Outside storage fire 1 0.06% 162 - Outside equipment fire 1 0.06% Total - Fires 31 2.68% 231 - Chemical reaction rupture of process vessel 1 0.06% Total - Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat - no fire 1 0.09% 300 - Rescue, emergency medical call (EMS) call, other 2 0.11% 311 - Medical assist, assist EMS crew 3 0.17% 32 - Emergency medical service (EMS) 1 0.06% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 708 39.29% 3210 - EMS Call on the Strand 22 1.22% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 51 2.83% 3220 - Vehicle accident without injuries 4 0.22% INC065 (3.01) Page 2 of 5 Printed 01/04/2005 08:08:44 • Incident Type Description Count Station; 101 - (Continued) 323 - Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Ped) 10 0.55% 331 - Lock -in (if lock out , use 511) 1 0.06% 353 - Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 2 0.11% 357 - Extrication of victim(s) from machinery 1 0.06% 371 - Electrocution or potential electrocution 1 0.06% 381 - Rescue or EMS standby 1 0.06% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 807 69.75% 40 - Hazardous condition, other 1 0.06% 400 - Hazardous condition, other 24 1.33% 410 - Flammable gas or liquid condition, other 3 0.17% 411 - Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 3 0.17% 412 - Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 6 0.33% 413 - Oil or other combustible liquid spill 2 0.11% 420 - Toxic condition, other 1 0.06% 422 - Chemical spill or leak 2 0.11% 440 - Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 3 0.17% 441 - Heat from short circuit (wiring), defective/worn 1 0.06% 444 - Power line down 4 0.22% 445 - Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 10 0.55% 471 -Explosive, bomb removal (for bomb scare, use 721 1 0.06% 480 - Attempted burning, illegal action, other 1 0.06% Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 62 5.36% 50 - Service call, other 1 0.06% 500 - Service Call, other 6 0.33% 51 - Person in distress. 1 0.06% 510 - Person in distress, other 6 0.33% 511 - Lock -out 9 0.50% 512 - Ring or jewelry removal 1 0.06% 520 - Water problem, other 13 0.72% 522 - Water or steam leak 32 1.78% 531 - Smoke or odor removal 8 0.44% 541 - Animal problem 5 0.28% 550 - Public service assistance, other 1 0.06% 551 - Assist police or other governmental agency 3 0.17% 553 - Public service 6 0.33% 554 - Assist invalid 3 0.17% 561 - Unauthorized burning 3 0.17% Total - Service CaII 98 8.47% 600 - Good intent call, other 8 . 0.44% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 50 2.77% 651 - Smoke scare, odor of smoke 5 0.28% 652 - Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 1 0.06% 653 - Barbecue, tar kettle 3 0.17% 671 - Hazmat release investigation w/ no hazmat 3 0.17% Total - Good Intent Call 70 6.05% 700 - False alarm or false call, other 7 0.39% 711 - Municipal alarm system, malicious false alarm 1 0.06% 714 - Central station, malicious false alarm 1 0.06% 730 - System malfunction, other 9 0.50% 733 - Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 10 0.55% INC065 (3.01) Page 3 of 5 Printed 01/04/2005 08:08:44 • • Incident Type Description Count Station; 101 - (Continued) 735 - Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 12 0.67% 736 - CO detector activation due to malfunction 1 0.06% 74 - Unintentional system/detector operation - no fire 2 0.11% 740 - Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 4 0.22% 741 - Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 5 0.28% 743 - Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 6 0.33% 744 - Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 1 0.06% 745 - Alarm system sounded, no fire - unintentional 19 1.05% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 78 6.74% 900 - Special type of incident, other 4 0.22% 911 - Citizen complaint 5 0.28% Total - Special Incident Type 9 0.78% UUUT - Test Call - No Incident 1 0.06% 1 0.09% Total for Station 1,157 64.21% Station: 201 11 - Structure Fire 2 0.11% 111 - Building fire 4 0.22% 113 - Cooking fire, confined to container 2 0.11% Total - Fires 8 9.09% 32 - Emergency medical service (EMS) 1 0.06% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 60 3.33% 3210 - EMS Call on the Strand 2 0.11% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 3 0.17% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 66 75.00% 571 - Cover assignment, standby, moveup Total - Service Call 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route Total - Good Intent Call 1 0.06% 1 1.14% 13 0.72% 13 14.77% Total for Station 88 4.88% Station: 2Q2 11 - Structure Fire 1 0.06% 110 - Structure fire, other 1 0.06% 111 - Building fire 4 0.22% 131 - Passenger vehicle fire 2 0.11% Total - Fires 8 9.76% 32 - Emergency medical service (EMS) 2 0.11% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 49 2.72% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 6 0.33% 323 - Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Ped) 1 0.06% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 58 70.73% 600 - Good intent call, other 1 0.06% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 13 0.72% Total - Good Intent Call 14 17.07% 700 - False alarm or false call, other 742 - Extinguishing system activation 1 0.06% 1 0.06% INC065 (3.01) Page 4 of 5 Printed 01/04/2005 08:08:44 • • Incident Type Description Station; 202 - (Continued) Total - Fals Alarm & False Call Count 2 2.44% Total for Station 82 4.55% Station: 301 142 - Brush, or brush and grass mixture fire 1 0.06% Total - Fires 1 100.00% Total for Station 1 0.06% Station: 601 111 - Building fire 6 0.33% 114 - Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue 1 0.06% 118 - Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1 0.06% Total - Fires 8 19.51% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 18 1.00% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 1 0.06% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 19 46.34% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 14 0.78% Total - Good Intent Call 14 34.15% Total for Station 41 2.28% Station: 901 111 - Building fire 1 0.06% 121 - Fire in mobile home used as fixed residence 1 0.06% Total - Fires 2 66.67% 731 - Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 1 0.06% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 1 33.33% Total for Station 3 0.17% Station: UNK 11 - Structure Fire 1 0.06% 110 - Structure fire, other 1 0.06% 111 - Building fire 3 0.17% 143 - Grass fire 1 0.06% 163 - Outside gas or vapor combustion explosion 1 0.06% Total - Fires 7 15.91% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 17 0.94% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 3 0.17% 353 - Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 1 0.06% Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 21 47.73% 511 - Lock -out 1 0.06% Total - Service Call 1 2.27% 611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 13 0.72% 652 - Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 1 0.06% Total - Good Intent Call 14 31.82% 73 - System or detector malfunction 1 0.06% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 1 2.27% Total for Station 44 2.44% 1,802 100.00% INC065 (3.01) Page 5 of 5 Printed 01/04/2005 08:08:44 • January 6, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 11, 2005 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT November 2004 STATISTICS CURRENT THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY MONTH LAST YEAR DATE TO DATE Workers Comp Claims Claims opened 2 2 9 5 Claims closed 1 0 11 0 Total open 56 52 Current Employee 37 30 Lost time (hours) Safety Fire 240 478 384 1093.50 1596 Police 0 Non -Safety 151 0 151 0 Liability Claims Claims opened 1 1 21 5 Claims closed 1 2 17 9 Total open 31 26 Employee -Involved Vehicle Accidents Safety 0 0 0 0 Non -safety 0 0 0 0 Employee Turnover Safety Non -Safety 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 2 Respectfully submitted, Noted: Michael A. Earl, Dire tor St-phen R. B rrell Personnel & Risk Ma agement City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 28, 2004 Regular Meeting of January 11, 2005 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT — NOVEMBER 2004 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; this includes engineering and management of Capital Improvements Projects. NON-CIP PROJECTS PLAN CHECK FOR CONST. ENVIRON. PLAN REVIEW SEWER._ LATERAL SEWER DEMO. _.STREET EXCAV. BANNERS DUMPSTER/ MISC. UTIL. CO. CUTS ENCR./C.U.P. ETC. CURRENT MONTH 28 2 3 5 8 7 28 30 2 YEAR TO DATE 59 21 16 21 36 26 125 78 9 NON-CIP PROJECTS STAFF HOURS DESCRIPTION CURRENT PREVIOUS YEAR TO MONTH DATE Field Investigations 32 32 157 Inspections 131 123 639 NPDES Permit/City Storm Water Management Program 16 10 82 General Office Engineering 103 83 377 Grant Applications 8 9 27 Projects 88 40 180 Meetings - Other Public Agencies 11 10 51 NPDES Investigations 3 11 34 TOTAL HOURS 392 318 1,155 SERVICE REQUESTS RECEIVED CURRENT MONTH COUNTS* COMPLETED YTD DESCRIPTION RECEIVED YTD Building Maintenance 66 302 268 Medians 3 6 3 Parks 26 135 110 Sewers 5 24 17 Storm Drains 0 19 16 Street Lighting 19 85 55 Street Maintenance 34 181 145 Traffic Safety 66 198 163 Vehicle Maintenance 27 159 158 Other 29 148 123 Call -Outs (Services provided after hours and/or on weekends) ** 7 27 27 TOTALS 282 1,284 1,085 85% completed ENGINEERING •The Capital Improvement Projects currently in progress or completed are: COMPLETED PROJECT NO. TITLE 04-05 BUDGET AMOUNT 04 - 114 Speed Humps 12,500 TOTAL COMPLETED 12,500 UNDER 04-05 CONSTRUCTION BUDGET PROJECT NO. TITLE AMOUNT 00 - 630 Pier Renovation, Phase III 4,109,360 TOTAL UNDER CONSTRUCTION 4,109,360 OUT TO BID PROJECT NO. TITLE 04-05 BUDGET AMOUNT 02 - 108 2nd Street Resurfacing 464,740 TOTAL OUT TO BID 464,740 UNDER 04-05 DESIGN BUDGET PROJECT NO. TITLE AMOUNT 02 - 106 Beach Drive Undergrounding/Street Improvements 105,442 04 - 115 Street Imp. — 20th St., Valley Dr. to Power St. 149,500 00 - 140 11th St. On Street Parking Improvements — ON HOLD 190,898 99 - 409* Manhole Repair/Reconstruction 244,315 00 - 412 Sewer Improvements* 76,290 03 - 418** Pump Station Upgrades ON HOLD 452,776 04 - 534 Park Improvements 25,000 99 - 610 Fire Station Upstairs Remodel & Additions 80,550 02 - 612 Public Works Yard Renovation 79,858 02 - 626 Community Center ADA Upgrades, Phases 3 & 4 148,222 TOTAL TO BE DESIGNED 1,552,851 TO BE 04-05 DESIGNED BUDGET PROJECT NO. TITLE AMOUNT 04 - 112 Slurry/Crack Sealing at Various Locations 100,000 04 - 113 Concrete Road Reconstruction at Various Locations 100,000 04 - 116 Street Imp. — Pier Ave., Hermosa Ave. to PCH 120,000 04 - 117 Manhattan Ave. Street Improvements 35,000 02 - 634 Exterior Painting of City Buildings 14,500 TOTAL TO BE DESIGNED 369,500 *03-04 Budget - Projects to be completed 04-05 **Includes amount to be reappropriated 2 MAINTENANCE • The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: • Building Maintenance • Equipment Service • Parks/Medians • Sewers/Storm Drains • Street Lighting • Street Maintenance/Traffic Safety Building Maintenance: Repaired plumbing in Strand restrooms; started mold removal at Base III; replaced floor tiles in Base III; developed specs for roof repairs at Base III and South School; moved boxes to storage; set up and took down tables/chairs in Council Chambers; repaired plumbing in Community Center; replaced ceiling tiles, repaired windows in City Hall. Equipment Service Division: Prepared police vehicles for auction; repaired CNG vehicles; repaired steed trailer; repaired van doors; replaced rear axles; on-going vehicle maintenance; warranty work with dealers. Parks/Medians Division: Installed and removed flags for Veterans Day; prepped Veterans Memorial for service; installed Christmas lights at Greenwood; repaired drinking fountains; repaired irrigation on Pier Ave.; installed Christmas decorations at Pier, along PCH, Pier Plaza and along Aviation; replaced volleyball news at City courts; removed Targe pine tree from Community Center Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Continued sewer line cleaning citywide; rebuilt manhole at Pier Ave. and Palm to recover tool; responded to sewer overflow at 33`' and Ingleside pump station. Street Lighting Division: Rebuilt all Christmas decorations; continuing USA markings; started test area for electrical savings at north end of the City; installed new palm tree lights on Plaza. Street Maintenance/Traffic Safety Division: Started signal relamping at Pier Ave. and Hermosa Ave; set up and took down barricades for polling locations; constructed new Christmas tree platform; installed surfer plaques on pier; red -lined all north -end alleys; removed graffiti; repaired potholes citywide; replaced all signs on Manhattan Ave. in project area. FY 04-05 MONTH Graffiti Removal: HOURS FY 03-04 MONTH HOURS JULY 31.5 JULY 30.0 AUGUST 38.0 AUGUST 29.5 SEPTEMBER 19.0 SEPTEMBER 39.5 OCTOBER 9.5 OCTOBER 23.0 NOVEMBER 6.0 NOVEMBER 28.0 DECEMBER DECEMBER 24.5 JANUARY JANUARY 17.0 FEBRUARY FEBRUARY 6.5 MARCH MARCH 28.0 APRIL APRIL 11.5 MAY MAY 167.5 JUNE JUNE 51.0 TOTALS 98.0 456.0 3 Respectfully submitted: Rhea B. Punneo Administrative Assistant Noted: MP' i4 Ste •Li n ' . Burrell City Manager Concur: Richard D. M. rgan, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer H:\B95\PWFILES\Activity Reports\Activity Report 04-05 November.doc 4 c e"- January 5, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 11, 2005 /X/A5 REPORT ON FULL DEPLOYMENT OF WIFI SYSTEM RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive the additional information that was requested at the 11/9/04 meeting and that the City Council determine whether or not it wishes to proceed with the full deployment of the Wifi system. If the City Council decides to proceed with the full deployment the wifi system, direct the City Manager to sign a sole source contract with LA Unplugged based on the attached proposal dated 9/28/04; appropriate $126,496 from the Equipment Replacement Fund to cover the cost of the system; authorize the City Manager to contract with Google for online ads in exchange for ad revenue; authorize the City Manager to contract with Ad Connect; direct the City Manager to enter into a service agreement with SCE for the installation of fiber to the City Hall to carry the bandwidth for both the wifi system and the City operations. BACKGROUND: The City Council, at the 11/9/04 meeting, directed staff to return with additional information concerning the Wifi Program. The requested information included a review of the franchise option; an amortization schedule for the wifi equipment so that it is set up on a reasonable replacement schedule, and whether or not the costs of system could be recovered during the life of the equipment. A copy of the minutes of that meeting are attached for reference. Franchise Process I have attached, as part of this report, examples of other cities that have chosen to use the franchise process in order to provide wifi coverage in their cities. The only one that has actually been deployed has been the City of Cerritos. The franchise/agreement with the City df Cerritos is attached for you review. The agreement provides for an exclusive use of right of way and other City of Cerritos facilities to the holder of the franchise. The residents and businesses that sign up for the service in Cerritos pay a monthly fee of $29.99 for wifi system broadband service. The interest by the City of Cerritos in assisting and entering into the agreement was to encourage the development of a broadband service. Prior to the development of the agreement, neither the telephone company nor the cable company provided high-speed bandwidth to the entire city. This was at least one of the reasons that the franchise holder, AirMesh, was interested in building the system, as at least for some timeframe they would be the only provider offering high-speed bandwidth. The business plan for AirMesh is to offer service (pb broadband in areas that are not serviced by telephone or cable companies. They have a number of installations and are working on others that meet their business plan. The motivation of providing the only high-speed bandwidth also has been a driving force in other areas where either the telephone company or cable companies have not chosen to offer the high-speed service. Whether a company would be willing to build and operate a system in the city under a franchise is hard to know. Our residents and businesses have access to both high-speed bandwidths from both the telephone company and cable company and each have a number of users. They charge anywhere from $29.95 to $59.95 depending on other services purchased as part of a package or special offers. The only way we would really know is to put the proposal out to bid and see if anyone is interested. A bid process for the city would take about 6 months. The other two RFP's that I have received are currently out to bid now. In additional, the City of West Hollywood has proposals out to build a system similar to ours. The approach that they are taking is to start with a pilot or test area and expand later. Costs The costs for the full deployment of the wifi system will total $126,496. This amount includes a $20,000 cost to bring fiber connection to the city hall. This fiber line will serve both the city operations and the wifi system. This cost will be treated separately and not included in the equipment replacement fund as the ongoing responsibly for the line will be SCE not the City's. The cost of the equipment for the wifi project considering both Phase I and the Full Deployment will total $141,026.00. This total includes $36,530.00 for Phase I and $104,496 for the full deployment costs. Staff was directed to set the replacement costs and include them in the ongoing monthly expenses for the wifi system. Using a total cost of the wifi system of $141,026.00, the replacement schedule has been set up on a 90 month or 7.5 years program. This results in a monthly cost of $1567.00. This cost becomes the replacement component of the expenses of the system. I have discussed the replacement schedule with our contractor and the timeframe for equipment replacement was determined to be reasonable. This replacement schedule would allow the accumulation of funds to service the system following the 1 year limited warranty period. One of the potential service providers at the last meeting offered to provide a warranty period longer than offered by the manufactures warranty. The offer that they made is in connection with providing a broadband service connection for the system. The city currently uses a different company to provide this service. The warranty offered was for the equipment that they use to provide the service. Broadband Costs The cost of purchasing bandwidth to the Internet is the largest ongoing cost that the system has. The approach for full deployment includes moving to a fiber optic line. This 'D would also allow us to change over our two T-1 lines and share the new fiber line. The full deployment will start with a bandwidth of 10 Mbps. This will have a cost of $1500 per month. This includes a loop charge and the bandwidth. The line would have a capacity of 45Mbps but that would not be needed at first, if ever. In any case, the costs for increased bandwidth could be tied to revenue growth or users. This cost represents one of the ongoing cost components at $1500 per month. The others are $500 for system support and $500 for the hardware support. The total ongoing operational charges are $2500. per month. If the existing T-1 line is transferred over to the fiber line and those charges ($750.00 per month) used to offset the cost of the fiber line the ongoing cost for the broadband is $750 per month. This then brings the total monthly operational component to $1750.00 Revenue Model The proposal' that I have received shows an estimated revenue of stream of $4800.00 per month. The number of signed contracts now totals 10 (this represents 5 new contracts in addition to the 5 that have signed up during Phase I). There are two additional contracts that are expected. These are agreements are for $250.00 per month and may be cancelled with 60 days notice to the City. This represents a total of $2500.00 per month of committed revenue. A spreadsheet is attached that goes into detail for each potential source of revenue. The purpose of entering into a contract with an advertising broker is to have them continue to seek the ads and revenue without impacting city staff. Maintaining the revenue stream will require ongoing work, which will be handled by the broker. This will reduce the time city staff might have to spend on this aspect of the system. MONTHLY ONGOING OPERATING COSTS System Replacement Cost ($141,025.96 over 90 months) T-1 Line (10Mbps to start) (50/50 share for City Hall usage) System Support (L.A. Unplugged) $1,567.00 $750.00 $500.00 Hardware Support $500.00 TOTAL COSTS $3,317.00 The current amount of committed revenue is $2500, which is $817 short of the monthly costs. The revenue may grow once it is operational and, in fact, may represent a chance to market the system and gain additional revenue in a manner similar to the proposal contained in the letter from Organix Worldwide, LLC involving creation of outdoor digital media along with the WiFi portal, home page and other outlets. This proposal is worth pursuing also and could end up part of the evolution of the wifi system. The lead z. A time to develop an agreement and complete service offering can be done while the wifi is being fully deployed and the community issues concerning placing a "lighthouse" on the Plaza is more fully explored. Respectfully submitted, ephen R. Burrell City Manager WiFi Hermosa Beach Revenue Projections Worksheet Basic Assumptions Low Users/day Uniques/month Pages/session Page views/mo Revenue Sponsorships Classifieds Travel Shopping Yellow Pages Dating Google Local News News Weather Sports High Expectation 2,000 5,000 3,000 2,000 10,000 - 5,000 2 10 7 120,000 1,500,000 Projections per source $2,000 $ 100.00 $ 105.00 $ 25.00 $ 96.00 $ 50.00 $ 120.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,137.50 $ 625.00 $ 427.50 $ 250.00 $ 3,750.00 630,000 $ 2,500.00 $ 250.00 $ 700.00 $ 125.00 $ 181.50 $ 100.00 $ 945.00 $ 2,496.00 $ 9,690.00 $ 4,801.50 Sponsors (AdJungle) 2 Zones with 10 slots each. One Banner and one Skyscraper. Fee can be set and modified at any time. Assume fee at start is $150 for the banner and $180 for the skyscraper. Low use assumes 20% sold, high 100%, and expected 70% sponsor slots sold. Fees of $250 per slot (and 20 slots) give a maximum gross revenue of $5,000, less fees results in a net of $3,500. Banner $ 1,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,250.00 Skyscraper $ 1,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,250.00 Total $ 2,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,500.00 Classifieds (AdConnect) Community classifieds for the portal offering free private party ads with upsells for various features. Businesses will pay a fee for classifieds with the same upsells for features. Assume one ad per 10 months from all users and average $1 per ad placed based on network experience. Revenue share 50/50. $ 100.00 $ 500.00 $ 250.00 Travel (Orbitz) Exclusive deal with Orbits to be the only provider of travel services resulting in a better deal. $7 per booking. Earnings are based on $7 per ticket and a peak of 325 tickets purchased by all Hermosa Beach residents during a popular travel month, and 150 during off-peak months. The site could capture 10% to 25% of these, but it could also double this if it could attract buyers from other travel services. For Expected, 100 tickets per month. $ 105.00 $ 1,137.50 $ 700.00 Shopping (77BIue) 4 50% revenue share on all affiliate income from close to 1,000 stores. Custom branded shopping portal can attract 5% to 10% of visitors. Average income per visitors is 50 cents. Assume 5% (low side) to 25% (high side) of the population uses the service. For expected, assume 10% use the shopping portal. $ 25.00 $ 625.00 $ 125.00 Yellow Pages (CitySearch) CitySearch pays 3 cents per local search, 15 cents per click on ads to local businesses, and $15 per advertiser who sign up for their service. Estimates beased on 1% of the unique users doing a search, 5% clicking on an ad, and from 5 (low) to 10 (expected) to 25 (high) businesses signing up for an ad. Search $ 6.00 $ 15.00 $ 9.00 Clicks $ 15.00 $ 37.50 $ 22.50 Ads $ 75.00 $ 375.00 $ 150.00 Total $ 96.00 $ 427.50 $ 181.50 Dating (Match.com) 100% of first time revenues ($24.95). Currently they have -1,000 members from Hermosa Beach. Assuming anywhere from a 2 to 5 year turnover, and 10% to 25% share of new subscriptions results in the low and high numbers. 2 and 5 year turnover means as many as 40 as as few as 15-20 new subscriptions per month from Hermosa. Bottom line from 2 (low) to 10 (high) per month, with a reasonable expectation of 4 memberships per month. $ 50.00 $ 250.00 $ 100.00 Google (AdSense and Search Earnings are from clicks on ads and from clicks on ads after a search is made. Click earnings vary by category, and click rates vary by audience. Taking this to a bottom line number can be done by going to the effective earnings per thousand pageviews. These numbers are not available (per Google Terms of Service), but low and high numbers are assumed from market experience. CPM $ 1.00 $ 2.50 $ 1.50 Local News (?) News (?) Weather (?) Sports (?) January 5, 2005 The Honorable Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager and the Hermosa Beach City Community Organix Worldwide, LLC presents to the Honorable Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, the City Council Members, the City Manager and the Hermosa Beach Community an exciting partnership that will secure the WiFi funding operating costs for the City of Hermosa Beach. Organix Proposal to the City of Hermosa Beach Organix Worldwide proposes a 2 -year services agreement with the City of Hermosa Beach that will secure the city's actual WiFi operating costs (currently estimated by the City to be between $3,600.00 and $5,000.00 per month). Our partnership with the City is aligned with the city's vision of offering free wireless Internet service for its constituents and visitors. In concert with this service agreement with the City, comprising both free WiFi service and the ability to create a value-added digital media network, Organix Worldwide would require the exclusive right to manage the city's website homepage, WiFi portal and all services introduced over the WiFi network and portal. Organix Worldwide would be the exclusive digital media service provider for the city's digital signage network, including but not limited to, the city's Digital Lighthouse (a digital signage application) with naming rights and the encompassing ad concession for outdoor and bathroom advertising. We are of the opinion that the WiFi network's operating expense cannot be guaranteed without the services that Organix plans to introduce over the portal and digital network. Advertising alone will not secure the funds required to cover these expenses. Organix Worldwide Business Model Organix Worldwide will maximize the business model by advocating Hermosa Beach businesses, South Bay businesses and even national brands to advertise over the portal and outdoor network. Organix will complement the advertising model by offering Hermosa Beach businesses Organix's existing digital media business services, (including, but not limited to: print, direct mail, email campaigning, coupon creation, SMS Text marketing, CRM management). Services that extend beyond this platform will be introduced as both opportunity and need arise. Organix is recommending a phased implementation approach that will ensure orderly sequence of service ramp -up. Phase 1 will be focused on the management and development of the WiFi portal and Hermosa Beach home page. The advertising platform and layout will be introduced and advertising solicitation will commence. In addition, a business directory will be built and business services will be offered. Phase 2 will begin in conjunction with the launch of the citywide, WiFi network. A Digital Media network will be launched, and the construction of a Digital Signage structure, conceptually reviewed with members of the Hermosa Beach City Council, termed "The Hermosa Beach Lighthouse" to be centered on Pier Plaza, will begin. A competitive solicitation for the "naming rights" on The Hermosa Beach Lighthouse will be managed by Organix. A full marketing campaign will commence announcing the new city branding, with the current concept conceived by Organix as "America's Beach City". Phase 3 and beyond will be determined by our success in Phase 1 and 2. Our expectation is that we will continue to introduce new services and enhance the quality of the community experience per our City "ESP" (Experience Service Provisioning) model. Background Organix is a digital media service provider. Our legacy and core competency lies in the ability to deliver an instance of digital content (from static print to full motion video) over the right platform (internes, digital display screens, mobile devices) to the right location, at the right time, in a secure fashion. Organix Worldwide and our partners bring together an expansive range of skill sets and through our Lifecyle Management Consulting Methodology we optimize digital media convergence for our clients. We believe that each of our clients has a different way of benefiting from the use of digital media and we work with them to find the right blend of services and solutions for their needs. To date, we have had the opportunity to meet with several City Council Members and elected officials to introduce our capabilities and demonstrate how our services can enable the overall vision for a WIFI-enabled Hermosa Beach community. We are impressed with the members, their vision for what a free WiFi network will mean for the city's constituents, and we are excited by the possibility of working with the city. Conclusion Organix Worldwide is excited to partner with the City of Hermosa Beach and is prepared to secure 2 years of WiFi operating expenses. The partnership hinges though on the commitment by the city of Hermosa Beach to the full vision presented above. We look forward to our meeting on the 11th of January, 2005. Sincerely, Ian McKee Organix Worldwide, LLC November 3, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 9, 2004 PROPOSAL FOR THE FULL CITY WIDE DEPLOYMENT OF THE WIFI SYSTEM, INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL ANTENNAS; CONTRACTS FOR ADVERTISING TO DEVELOP REVENUES TO COVER THE SYSTEMS ONGOING COSTS; AND APPROPRIATION OF $126,496 TO COVER THE COST OF THE SYSTEM. Recommendation: That the City Council approve the city wide deployment of the wifi system; direct the City Manager to sign a sole source contract with LA Unplugged based on the attached proposal dated 9/28/04; appropriate $126,496 from the Equipment Replacement Fund to cover the cost of the system; authorize the City Manager to contract with Google for online ads in exchange for ad revenue; authorize the City Manager to contract with Ad Connect; direct the City Manager to enter into a service agreement with SCE for the installation of fiber to the City Hall to carry the bandwidth for both the wifi system and the City operations. Background: The City has been working on the wifi system for over one year. The City Council approved the design and installation of the system in May 2004 and the system was operational in August of 2004. Since the system has been operational, we have had 300 to 500 users on a regular basis. Users have been able to have download speeds exceeding that of DSL or Cable service of most of the time. The system has worked well and, while there have been a few down times, the problems have been identified and solutions implemented. The system has been well received by those that have been able to take advantage of it and probably the most asked question of staff is when will the system be deployed city wide. Overall, the Phase I deployment has been a success and the things that we have learned in the last several months about the system are being integrated into the citywide deployment. This is proposed as a sole source purchase to move forward from the Phase I contract and make sure that the system is fully integrated. There have been three wifi classes and each of them have packed the council chambers with residents and business operators that were interested in learning how they could take advantage of the system. The classes will resume once the city wide deployment is approved and completed. The contractor can complete the installation by the March 1, 2005 assuming that the proposal is approved at this meeting. The City Council, in approving the Phase I deployment, also directed staff to try to develop revenue sources from sponsorships and advertisements. There are presently 5 sponsorships at $250.00 per month for a total of $1,250 per month. It is expected that 6b with citywide deployment it will be easier to sign up others as the exposure will be much greater. There are a number of other options that will, in total, generate somewhere between $3,000 and $5,000 per month. These options include Google, Adsense and Adsearch; Homepage ads, Classifieds, Sponsor Ads and Portal Affiliated buying page. These ads would be placed and handled by a third party rather than City staff. The revenue clearly would cover the on-going monthly costs for the system. The ongoing monthly costs for the system are estimated to total $4,500. These monthly costs are mainly for bandwidth, which will run between $2,000 for 10MB to $3,500 for 45MB. We will start will 10MB and move toward 45MB once the user count is up. The installation in the city wide deployment includes the cost of bringing fiber to City Hall which will allow the use of the fiber for city operation and therefore eventually drop the separate costs that we have for the two TI lines that we have now. These two lines run a total of $1,483 per month. If we allocated the same cost of the T1 lines the to the monthly operating costs of the wifi system the net cost would be $3,017. Revenue from ads will further reduce the monthly costs. Other costs include system maintenance through LA Unplugged at $500 per month and $500 for hardware maintenance not covered in the warranty or other ongoing services. If we do better than estimated in the revenue side, it could be directed to system replacement. The system should be usable for at least 10 years. The proposal for citywide deployment includes 12 additional nodes to cover the rest of the city. It is possible that there will be some geographic areas that will be more difficult to serve and staff has included a contingency in the overall appropriation to cover this issue. The capital cost of the citywide deployment is $114,996 plus $11,500 as a contingency for a total of $126,496. This would provide for the citywide deployment to be completed and operational by March 1, 2005. I have attached a breakdown of the costs for your information. It is suggested that the funding for this be appropriated from the Equipment Replacement Fund. There is enough funding to cover this expenditure. It is estimated that once fully deployed citywide, there will be between 2000 to 4000 residential users and 50 to 250 visitors. This compares with the present usage of 300 to 500 residential users and 20 to 50 visitors each day. The citywide system will incorporate some of the items that we found will improve the performance. This includes a fail over system that will allow the users of the system to continue using it when the main bandwidth system is down or is in a maintenance mode. Fail over is being provided at each of the super nodes and this will allow remote monitoring and restart. Respectfully subpitted, Zai tephen R. Burrell City Manager WIFI CITYWIDE DEPLOYMENT — CAPITAL COST 12 Super Nodes dated 9/28/04 ($6,000 removed and shifted to ongoing monthly costs) $78,351.00 Fail Over System $5,845.00 Fail Over Nodes $4,800.00 Rack Server Computer $2,000.00 SCE Fiber Connection $20,000.00 Subtotal $114,996.00 Contingency $11,500 TOTAL $126,496 LA Unplugged, PO Box 396, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Quote Date: 9/9/04 Project Networking Backup, Redundanc7 Auto Reboots • Company Contact: Eric Black Ph: 310-600-0699 Fx: 310-388-3239 ericc LAunptuooed.net Qty. Notes _ Items Unit . Price Extended Amount 1 2 4 Telephony Room )(roads Edge SB -150 provides DSL Failover & Load Balancing $ 1,250 $ 1,250 Fire Tower to Basement Telephony Room Plenum Rated Data Cable 2 separate runs $ 150 $ 300 Auto Power Cycler - Internet Enabled $ 385 $ 1,540 Hardware $ 3,090 Sales Tax 8.25% Maintenance and Warranty (1 year) Electrical Contractors Hardware Installation & Networking Configuration Total 1. Errors and Omissions accepted. 2. LA Unplugged Confidential. No unauthorized duplication or distribution. $ 266 $ 600 $ 600 $ 1,600 $ 6,846 1 2 1 2 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 1 2 2 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 1 WM11A WM11G WM11A WM11G Base Module Mesh Network Module 802.11a Radio Module Cable Assembly - LMR200 802.11a Mesh Antenna 802.11a Combiner/Splitter 802.11g Radio Module Cable Assembly - LMR400 WISPer 802.11g AGC Strix Outdoor Enclosure Base Module 802.11a Radio Module Cable Assembly - LMR200 802.11a Mesh Antenna 802.11a Combiner/Splitter 802.11g Radio Module Cable Assembly - LMR400 WISPer 802.11g AGC Strix Outdoor Enclosure $ 125.00 $ 899.00 $ 150.00 $ 160.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 350.00 $ 125.00 $ 899.00 $ 150.00 $ 160.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 350.00 $ $ 375.00 $ 899.00 $ 150.00 $ 480.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 1,050.00 $ $ 375.00 $ 899.00 $ 150.00 $ 480.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 1,050.00 {1; 'f'*:;•; 16 7 „ x3 :y''�y -..',-1-1 _,, a =, K'054 OOf 3 2 Base Module $ - 1 Mesh Network Module $ - 2 WM11A 802.11a Radio Module $ - 3 Cable Assembly - LMR200 $ 125.00 $ 375.00 1 802.11a Mesh Antenna $ 899.00 $ 899.00 1 802.11a Combiner/Splitter $ 150.00 $ 150.00 3 WM11G 802.11g Radio Module $ - 3 Cable Assembly - LMR400 $ 160.00 $ 480.00 1 WISPer $ 2,100.00 $ 2,100.00 3 802.11g AGC $ 350.00 $ 1,050.00 1 Strix Outdoor Enclosure $ - 4 x 2 Base Module $ -1 2 WM11A 802.11a Radio Module $ - 3 Cable Assembly - LMR200 $ 125.00 $ 375.00 1 802.11a Mesh Antenna $ 899.00 $ 899.00 1 802.11a Combiner/Splitter $ 150.00 $ 150.00 3 WM11G 802.11g Radio Module $ - 3 Cable Assembly - LMR400 $ 160.00 $ 480.00' 1 WISPer $ 2,100.00 $ 2,100.00 3 802.11g AGC $ 350.00 $ 1,050.00 1 Strix Outdoor Enclosure $ - . t 7tia.ti ..• 5 Er , 1100 .'M %Aa:V74 . 1 ~*.tkik ^ at .. n3r r x --C4:4Ai ;AiSfr n::t -1 /F2:, .S 0 a Base Module $ - Monterey 0 WM11A 802.11a Radio Module $ - 6 Cable Assembly - LMR200 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 2 802.11a Mesh Antenna $ 899.00 $ 1,798.00 2 802.11a Combiner/Splitter $ 150.00 $ 300.00 :m �a i __ v,, i... ' 1,=; , nr ,t =i t. ` '�1 .1, Base Module !t<.`t ', '' _ _, $,00 6 fire tower 2 $ - 4 WM11A 802.11a Radio Module $ - 6 Cable Assembly - LMR200 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 2 802.11a Mesh Antenna $ 899.00 $ 1,798.00 2 802.11a Combiner/Splitter $ 150.00 $ 300.00 6-B2 1 Strix Outdoor Enclosure $ - _:._ j Ii<,"_�.��:M�_"'r""' �`- . G.r' .. a Z__&_ 7 2 Base Module $ - 2 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 10 1 4 6 2 2 3 3 1 3 WM11A WM11G 802.11a Radio Module Cable Assembly - LMR200 802.11a Mesh Antenna 802.11a Combiner/Splitter 802.11g Radio Module Cable Assembly - LMR400 WISPer 802.11g AGC Strix Outdoor Enclosure WM11A WM11G WAWA- '.9' ".1: . Base Module Mesh Network Module 802.11a Radio Module Cable Assembly - LMR200 802.11a Mesh Antenna 802.11a Combiner/Splitter 802.11g Radio Module Cable Assembly - LMR400 WISPer 802.11g AGC Strix Outdoor Enclosure -•'U'r a _. 3 4 6 2 2 3 3 1 3 1 2 1 2 3 WM11A WM11G • Base Module 802.11a Radio Module Cable Assembly - LMR200 802.11a Mesh Antenna 802.11a Combiner/Splitter 802.11g Radio Module Cable Assembly - LMR400 WISPer 802.11g AGC WM11A Strix Outdoor Enclosure Base Module Mesh Network Module 802.11a Radio Module Cable Assembly - LMR200 $ $ 125.00 $ 375.00 $ 899.00 $ 899.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $ $ 160.00 $ 480.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 350.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 125.00 $ 899.00 $ 150.00 $ 160.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 350.00 :'.414** $ 125.00 $ 899.00 $ 150.00 $ 160.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 350.00 $ - $ - $ $ 750.00 $ 1,798.00 $ 300.00 $ $ 480.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 1,050.00 $ z $ $ 750.00 $ 1,798.00 $ 300.00 125.00 $ $ 480.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 375.00 Hardware $ 59,983.00 Unplugged Discount Reflecting Strix Systems Partnership $(12,500.00) Sales Tax @ 8.25% $ 3,917.35 1 1 3 3 1 3 1 WM11G 802.11a Mesh Antenna 802.11a Combiner/Splitter 802.11g Radio Module Cable Assembly - LMR400 WISPer 802.11g AGC Strix Outdoor Enclosure $ 899.00 $ 150.00 $ 160.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 350.00 $ 899.00 $ 150.00 $ - $ 480.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 1,050.00 $ - :i^. 4?'/ ti VW/ 'K ) '',11 : x." Ark. 7 rwJ r :: iF 'OP'.?w a a "K je `_..�-{� i ?yh \•F r ,t 054 V0 F 11 2 Base Module $ 2 WM11A 802.11a Radio Module $ - 3 Cable Assembly - LMR200 $ 125.00 $ 375.00 1 802.11a Mesh Antenna $ 899.00 $ 899.00 1 802.11a Combiner/Splitter $ 150.00 $ 150.00 3 WM11G 802.11g Radio Module $ - 3 Cable Assembly - LMR400 $ 160.00 $ 480.00 1 WISPer $ 2,100.00 $ 2,100.00 3 802.11g AGC $ 350.00 $ 1,050.00 1 Strix Outdoor Enclosure $ - itiff*14 ...,. ORM 12 Hope Chapel 2 Base Module $ - 1 Mesh Network Module $ - 2 WM11A 802.11a Radio Module $ - 3 Cable Assembly - LMR200 $ 125.00 $ 375.00 1 802.11a Mesh Antenna $ 899.00 $ 899.00 1 802.11a Combiner/Splitter $ 150.00 $ 150.00 3 WM11G 802.11g Radio Module $ - 3 Cable Assembly - LMR400 $ 160.00 $ 480.00 1 WISPer $ 2,100.00 $ 2,100.00 3 802.11g AGC $ 350.00 $ 1,050.00 1 Strix Outdoor Enclosure $ - 12-B1 $. �'! ,rG A. e; ° :^'�yt li' 1 u�hN �k�� ,W..�:+:� = TETRAD iir-1 } �*.;�?7,7 , ;"- J{7+,fa2S.Y'�'�..�.�hl +.�.� ' y*} y � '�..�138.A+4Iiw $ 899.00 �yjMr' �� ( M71-'..AL7�w5 $ 899.00 '` �1�.1:.� -�., �$ SwW. 5 953:00 Hardware $ 59,983.00 Unplugged Discount Reflecting Strix Systems Partnership $(12,500.00) Sales Tax @ 8.25% $ 3,917.35 Maintenance and Warranty (1 year) $ 6,000.00 Less Phase 1 and Wireless Transport Warranty $ (2,050.00) Electrical Contractors $ 4,000.00 Engineering $ 25,000.00 Totalj $ 84,350.35 WIFI CITYWIDE DEPLOYMENT — MONTHLY COST Bandwidth $3,500.00 10 MB - $2,000 45 MB - $3,500 . System Maintenance $500.00 LA Unplugged Hardware Maintenance $500.00 TOTAL $4,500.00 'Council Minutes -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA City of Hermosa Beach Homepage Local Government City Officials City Departments Administration City Clerk City Manager Community Development Community Resources Finance Fire Department Personnel Police Department Public Works CasSes and Act vities For Residents For Visitors For Businesses Page 1 of 14 Local Government Home > De'artments > Cit Clerk > Agendas and Minutes > e1 mota Council Minutes Bids & Proposals City Council Agendas City Council Minutes Elections Municipal Code Notices Homepage Search,Agendas and Minutes,, • City Council Agendas City Council Minutes MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, November 9, 2004, at the hour of 7:10 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Pat Love ROLL CALL Present: Edgerton, Keegan, Reviczky, Tucker, Mayor Yoon Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilmember Tucker thanked everyone who voted at the November 2 election and those who volunteered to work in the precincts. He also thanked everyone who contributed to the successful annual Beach Cities Toy Drive Fashion Show fundraiser November 7 at Sangria. He mentioned that the Mira Costa and Redondo football game will take place Friday, November 12 and encouraged everyone to see these traditional rivals compete. Councilmember Edgerton thanked those who attended and donated prizes for the Beach Cities Toy Drive Fashion Show. Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky announced the 20th Annual Candlelight Veteran's Day Ceremony being held on Thursday, November 11, at 6:30 p.m. at the City's Veteran's Memorial near the Community Center on Pacific Coast Highway. http://www.hermosabch. org/departments/cityclerk/agenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 Council Minutes -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 2 of 14 Mayor Yoon reminded everyone about the November 20 torchiere lamp trade-in and encouraged all to take advantage of the opportunity to receive a new energy-efficient, safer Tamp in exchange for the dangerous energy -wasting lamps. He cheered on his former school Andover in its upcoming game with rival Exeter. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: There was no written correspondence. Coming forward at this time to address the Council were: Craig Cadwallader - Hermosa Beach, invited everyone to Cruz Island Beach 2004, a Surf, Skate & Hawaiiana Expo, on Saturday, November 13, from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., at Aviation Park, which will include a silent auction to raise funds for the Hermosa Beach Surf Legends Memorial Fountain, and exhibits by the Hermosa Beach Historical Society, the Los Angeles County Lifeguards, and the Surfriders Foundation; and Leslie Neff - asked for the community's support of a fundraiser for the Peter Zippi Animal Adoption Foundation on Sunday, November 14, from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on the second level of the VCA coast Animal Hospital, with a silent auction, a boutique and Tots of cats and kittens. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (i), with the exception of the following items, which were removed for discussion in item 4, but are shown in order for clarity: (e) Edgerton, (f) Reviczky, and (h) Keegan. Motion Reviczky, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 7:20 p.m., the order of the agenda was suspended to go to item 8(b). a. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON OCTOBER 26, 2004. Action: To approve as presented the City Council minutes of the Regular Adjourned meeting of October 26, 2004. b. RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 38313 THROUGH 38448, AND TO APPROVE THE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NO. http://www.hermosabch. org/departments/cityclerk/agenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 'Council Minutes -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 3 of 14 38348, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. Action: To ratify the check register, as presented. c. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.(PDF File). Action: To receive and file tentative future agenda items, as presented. d. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE SEPTEMBER 2004 FINANCIAL REPORTS: (PDF File) 1. Revenue and expenditure report ; 2. City5reasurer's report ; and, 3. Investment report . Action: To receive and file the September 2004 financial reports: e. RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT THE WORK BY NEWTECH ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, INC., GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 04-114 24TH PLACE SPEED HUMPS; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION; AND, AUTHORIZE STAFF TO RELEASE PAYMENT TO NEWTECH ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. (10% RETAINED FOR 35 DAYS FOLLOWING FILING OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION). Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated November A., 2004. (PDF File) . This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1. Accept the work by Newtech Engineering and Construction, Inc., Glendale, California, for Project No. CIP 04-114 24th Place Speed Humps; 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion; and 3. Authorize staff to release payment to Newtech Engineering and Construction, Inc. (10°k retained for 35 days following filing of Notice of Completion). Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Yoon. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. http://www. hermosabch. org/departments/cityclerk/agenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 Council Minutes — City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 4 of 14 f. RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT DONATION OF $75,000 FROM AMERICAN EXPRESS TO BE USED FOR FUTURE SUNSET CONCERT SERIES EVENTS.Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated November 3, 2004.(PDF File). g• This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky in order to acknowledge and thank the donor. Proposed Action : To accept the donation of $75,000 from American Express to be used for future Sunset Concert Series events and place the funds into an endowment account for future concerts. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. Discussion ensued regarding the use of the funds, and the motion was subsequently withdrawn. Action : To accept the donation of $75,000 from American Express and direct staff to report back at a future agenda on options for use of the funds for Council consideration. Motion Reviczky, second Keegan. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Edgerton and Tucker. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 20, 2004.(PDF File). Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of October 20, 2004. h. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROPRIATE $37,603 FROM THE CITIZEN'S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) PROGRAM TO ASSIST IN THE PURCHASE OF STATION/JAIL CAMERAS, VEHICLE CAMERAS AND THE ASSOCIATED DATA STORAGE SYSTEMS; APPROPRIATE $30,627 FROM THE CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT PROGRAM FUND (CLEEP) FOR THE PURCHASE OF NEW GENERATION UNITROLS AND MOBILE DIGITAL COMPUTER (MDC) RACK MOUNTS FOR THE POLICE PATROL CARS; AND, APPROPRIATE $268 FROM THE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) PROGRAM FOR THE PURCHASE OF APPROXIMATELY THREE "PEN HOLE" CAMERAS. Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin dated November 1, 2004.(PDF File). This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Keegan for separate discussion later in http: //www. hermosabch. org/departments/cityclerk/agenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 Council Minutes -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 5 of 14 the meeting. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1. Appropriate $37,603 from the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) program to assist in the purchase of station/jail cameras, vehicle cameras and the associated data storage systems; 2. Appropriate $30,627 from the California Law Enforcement Equipment Program Fund (CLEEP) for the purchase of new generation Unitrols and mobile digital computer (MDC) rack mounts for the police patrol cars; and 3. Appropriate $268 from the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) program for the purchase of approximately three "pen hole" cameras. Motion Keegan, second Tucker. The motion carried by a - unanimous vote. i. RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION REVERSING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION AND APPROVE A VARIANCE TO THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK AT 3410 HERMOSA AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated November 3, 2004.(PDF File). Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 04-6365, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 3 -FOOT SIDE YARD FOR AN EXISTING BUILDING, RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 5 -FEET, WITH THE INCREASED SETBACK REQUIREMENT CAUSED BY MERGING TWO LOTS AT 3410 HERMOSA AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK 101, SHAKESPEARE TRACT." 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES None 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 2(e) and (f) were heard at 7:22 p.m. and item 2(h) was heard at 10:23 p.m., but they are all shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. http;//www. hermosabch.org/departments/cityclerklagenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 Council Minutes -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 6 of 14 At 7:29, the order of the agenda went to item 6(c). 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. CONSIDER WHETHER TO ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY OVER ENFORCEMENT OF THE STATE MOBILEHOME PARKS ACT, WITH RESPECT TO CONSTRUCTION, USE AND MAINTENANCE OF STRUCTURES WITHIN THE MARINELAND MOBILEHOME PARK AT 531 PIER AVENUE AND THE RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK AT 725 10TH STREET.Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated November 2 2004.(PDF File). Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 7:42 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: John Carr - Hermosa Beach RV Park resident, asked that the Council listen to the concerns of the fine people who live in the park, a very nice low-income housing facility; Pat Love - Marineland Mobilehome Park resident, cited problems with the previous park management; said all systems, gas, water, electrical, drainage, etc., are in compliance with the code and things have been running smoothly since Millennium purchased the park; asked the Council to vote no on the. City's assuming responsibility from the State for inspections; Mark Lea - Marineland resident, said theirs is a close-knit community and that the park is clean and in compliance with codes; said it was not necessary for the City to take responsibility for inspections; Chris Bradison - Hermosa Beach RV Park owner, said it was a simple matter for the park to be well maintained and in compliance and urged the Council not to take responsibility for inspections; Sam Durant - Marineland resident, said he and his partner had repaired and rebuilt many units in the park and they always complied with codes; said the City could help Marineland by diverting water from Pier Avenue which always ends up in the lowest spot in the park and by widening Ardmore and Victoria because the bushes made passing other cars difficult (Mayor Yoon asked that Public Works Director Morgan investigate those http: //www. hermosabch. org/departments/cityclerk/agenmin/cca20041109/minutes. html 12/28/2004 Council Minutes -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 7 of I4 problems); Geoff Hirsch - Marineland resident, concurred about the drainage problems, with about seven home sites being flooded during thanked the Council for their past assistance in maintaining low-income housing; said even though management was much better, some residents, including the elderly, disabled, or single mothers, were struggling financially, noting that rents have increased by 40% with the recent sale; suggested that the City's most helpful role would be helping Marineland find financing to make needed repairs, including improved drainage; and Karen Bruns - Marineland resident, requested that the City address the following three issues: (1) positive identification of lot lines for the park and an explanation of the three-foot clearance from lot lines for vehicles; (2) why cats were allowed freely to roam through the park when it was stated that all animals must be on a leash or in a fenced yard; and (3) the subject of low-cost housing and the recent 40% rent increase which forced her neighbor to move out of the park after living there for 25 years. The public hearing closed at 7:53 p.m. Action: To not assume responsibility over enforcement of the State Mobilehome Parks Act, with respect to construction, use and maintenance of structures within the Marineland Mobilehome Park at 531 Pier Avenue and the Recreational Vehicle Park at 725 10th Street Motion Edgerton, second Keegan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. ANNUAL REVIEW OF FIESTAS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated November 3, 2004. (PDF File). City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this issue were: Conn Flatley - Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, described details of the Chamber's successful marketing campaign, noting a 27% increase in hotel tax revenues http://www. hermosabch.org/departments/cityclerk/agenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 Council Minutes -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 8 of 14 to the City in the last year; encouraged the Council to look at the expanded travel section on the Chamber website; said he looked forward to working with the City on future Fiestas; Carla Merriman - Executive Director of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and Visitors' Bureau, requested that the Council approve the 2005 Fiestas, noting the success this year as family events and as fundraisers; said the City received $37,000 and increased sales tax, the restaurants and shops had much more business, and three local charities shared $36,000 over Labor Day weekend for manning the beer garden; said Police, Fire and Public Works were pleased with the Chamber's safety, traffic control and cleanup efforts; said there had never been a Fiesta -related Police incident in the event's 33 -year history and, in fact, Police Chief Lavin believes the Fiestas have a calming effect on what otherwise might be two unruly weekends Action: To approve the 2005 Memorial Day and Labor Day Fiestas, as recommended by staff. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. General direction was given to staff to decrease trash proliferation in the downtown area throughout the year, not necessarily Fiesta -related. The meeting recessed at 8:15 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m. At 9:40 p.m., the order of the agenda went to item 8(a). b. PROPOSAL FOR FULL CITYWIDE DEPLOYMENT OF THE WIFI SYSTEM, INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL ANTENNAS; CONTRACTS FOR ADVERTISING TO DEVELOP REVENUES TO COVER THE SYSTEMS ONGOING COSTS; AND APPROPRIATION OF $126,496 TO COVER THE COST OF THE SYSTEM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated November 3, 2004.(PDF File). Mayor Yoon recused himself and left the dais and the room at 8:25 p.m. due to a potential conflict of interest since his employment involves Internet access. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions http://www. hermosabch. org/departments/cityclerklagenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 Council Minutes -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 9 of 14 Coming forward to address the Council on this issue were: Brad Waller - representing Ad Jungle, who provided data for the City Manager's staff report, described his business and explained how the City's WiFi website could be set up to earn revenue from business and classified ads, as well as links to other revenue -generating sites. Janice Chase - a former database administrator for BizRate.com, a shopping portal, concurred that advertising revenue could support the cost of WiFi; said she was a Marineland Mobilehome Park resident and had written an article in their newsletter and the response from park residents indicated their great level of interest; said she would endure potholes in the streets as a tradeoff for free WiFi; Ann Sullivan - Hermosa Beach, said that free WiFi was the best thing the City had done since purchasing the railroad right of way for the greenbelt; said she appreciated this potential savings in light of other uncontrollable increases in day-to-day living expenses; Julian Katz - Hermosa Beach, said that his career was high tech and he saw tremendous benefits for the City and felt sure there would be revenue sources; Craig Cadwallader- Hermosa Beach business owner, said he was a marketing consultant for website design; agreed that revenue sources were available; congratulated the City for being forward -thinking; Roberta Moore - Hermosa Beach, said she was very happy about free WiFi but also wanted the potholes fixed; suggested that funds to support this project could be raised by increasing the Utility Users' Tax; Eric Lawrence - Hermosa Beach, said he wholeheartedly supported free WiFi and looked for it when he traveled with his laptop, said this would benefit City businesses, particularly the hotels, and he looked forward to the savings for his family; said free WiFi would increase the value of homes in the City as well; Leslie Neff - Hermosa Beach, said this benefit would be very valuable to the City and its residents in the long run; Stan Levine - Hermosa Beach, said free WiFi is a http://www.hermosabch. org/departments/cityclerk/agenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 Council Minutes - City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 10 of 14 progressive benefit that will bring in visitors and will help the businesses in the City; said maybe a very small fee or donations could contribute to the project's funding; said he was happy to have an Internet access alternative other than Adelphia; Ken Orr - Hermosa Beach, said he thought this would be a great benefit to the City, now and even more in the future, even considering the cost; Laura Guneau - Hermosa Beach, said this access would bring people to the City, which would benefit the businesses and increase home values; Jeremy Stern - representing Adelphia Communications, said he had been practicing communications law for 24 years; said technology has been advancing at a remarkable pace and, as wonderful as wireless internet access is, it was not necessarily a good idea for municipalities to provide the service; cited financial risks, due to the large initial cost and ongoing maintenance costs, and the risk of owning an outdated System, with new technology being developed all the time, said this was a significant policy issue for the City Council to consider; Bruce Gelb - Hermosa Beach, spoke in support of free WiFi and commended the City for its vision; said this was the kind of thing that makes Hermosa Beach a treasure; Mordy Benjamin - Hermosa Beach, said he attended the WiFi classes and had never seen such excitement in the community; said this was a true community service and one of the most beneficial projects the City could fund; Larry Hoskinson - Hermosa Beach, said his reception was wonderful; the class had been helpful and installation was easy; said friends in other cities said they had read articles about free WiFi in Hermosa Beach; suggested that the American Express donation go toward funding this project; John Bowler - Hermosa Beach, said this was one of those unusual moments for the Council to provide a service that would reflect on the City for a long time; said partial funding could be provided by increasing the transient occupancy tax at hotels in the City because WiFi will increase their business; Gene Dreher - Hermosa Beach, said although the cost http://www.hermosabch. org/departments/cityclerk/agenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 Council Minutes -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 11 of 14 seems high, this infrastructure feature would pay for itself, in part, because of savings at City Hall; said the streets in need of repair actually slow down traffic so he is willing to trade paving for free WiFi; Offir Schwartz - representing one of the local companies bidding to provide bandwidth for the City's WiFi network, said he was impressed by the optimism of the community; made a tentative offer, subject to his CEO's approval, to provide free network maintenance for life; and Joe Terry - Hermosa Beach, said he loved living in Hermosa Beach and urged the Council to approve this expansion of free WiFi to the rest of the City. Proposed Action : To approve staff recommendation to: 1. Approve the citywide deployment of the WiFi system, 2. Direct the City Manager to sign a sole source contract with LA Unplugged based on the proposal dated September 28, 2004; 3. Appropriate $126,496 from the Equipment Replacement Fund to cover the cost of the system; 4. Authorize the City Manager to contract with Google for online ads in exchange for ad revenue; 5. Authorize the City Manager to contract with Ad Connect; 6. Direct the City Manager to enter into a service agreement with SCE for the installation of fiber to the City Hall to carry the bandwidth for both the WiFi system and the City operations, and 7. Give staff authority to negotiate with contractors possibly offering free month maintenance. Motion Keegan, second Reviczky. The motion failed, noting the dissenting votes of Edgerton and Tucker, and the absence of Mayor Yoon. Action : To continue the item and direct staff to report back with details on the issues raised this evening, including advertising revenue, the amortization of all costs, confirming the speaker's offer for free maintenance; as well as the possibility of having a franchise, Motion Edgerton, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Keegan and the absence of Mayor Yoon. The meeting recessed at 10:05 p.m. http://www.hermosabch. org/departments/cityclerk/agenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 Council Minutes -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 12 of 14 The meeting reconvened at 10:12 p.m. with the return of Mayor Yoon to discuss removed consent calendar item 2 (h). c. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT TO JOIN THE LOS ANGELES AREA REGIONAL AGENCY (LARA). Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 26, 2004.(PDF File). Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action : To authorize the Mayor to execute a Joint Powers Agreement to join the Los Angeles Area Regional Agency (LARA) for AB939 waste diversion and disposal reporting purposes and authorize appropriation of $3,500 for FY 04/05 from the solid waste diversion budget account for membership in LARA. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 7:30 p.m., the order of the agenda went to public hearing item 5(a). 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER None 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS OF SIGNATURE VERIFICATION OF AN INITIATIVE PETITION PROPOSING TO PROHIBIT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON THE BEACH AND ON THE GREENBELT. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated November 3, 2004. (PDF File). City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To direct the City Clerk to prepare the documents required to submit the ordinance, without alteration, to the voters at the next regular municipal election occurring not less than 88 days after the date of the order. Motion Edgerton. The motion was replaced by a http://www. hermosabch. org/departments/cityclerk/agenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 Council Minutes -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 13 of 14 substitute motion. Action: To order a report pursuant to California Elections Code 9212, to be brought back at the next Council meeting of November 23, at which time the Council shall either adopt the ordinance within 10 days or order an election. Motion Keegan, second Mayor Yoon. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 10:23, the order of the agenda went to item 9(a). b. ST. PATRICK'S DAY PARADE & FESTIVAL SUBCOMMITTEE — APPOINTMENT OF COUNCILMEMBERS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated November 3, 2004.(PDF File). City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To appoint Councilmember Tucker and Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky to a subcommittee to work on the St. Patrick's Day Celebration for 2006. Motion Edgerton, second MayorNoon. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 8:22 p.m., the order of the agenda went to item 4, consent calendar items removed for discussion. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL None a. REQUEST BY COUNCILMEMBER KEEGAN TO HAVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDER A CHANGE IN THE CONDOMINIUM ORDINANCE TO REQUIRE SEPARATE WATER METERS FOR EACH UNIT. Councilmember Keegan spoke to his request. Action: To direct the Planning Commission to consider a change in the Condominium ordinance to require separate water meters for each unit. Motion Keegan, second Reviczky. ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, November 9, 2004, at the hour of 10:25 p.m. to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on Tuesday, November http://www.hermosabch. org/departments/cityclerklagenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 Council Minutes -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA Page 14 of 14 23, 2004, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. for the purpose of interviewing Cable Television Commission applicants, to be followed by the Regular Meeting scheduled to place at 7:10 p.m. Homepage City Council Agendas City Council Minutes FAQ Site Map Contact Us Links Feedback Web Cams Search 1 City of Hermosa Beach, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0239 http://www.hermosabch. org/departments/cityclerk/agenmin/cca20041109/minutes.html 12/28/2004 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council - -FROM: Art Gallucci, City Manager INITIATED BY: John H. Saunders, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Annie Luger, Public Information Manager DATE: November 24, 2003 SUBJECT: BACKGROUND CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL BY AIIRNET WIRELESS, LLC TO INSTALL LOW POWER, WIRELESS RADIO TRANSMITTERS ON TRAFFIC SIGNAL SAFETY LIGHTS AND OTHER CITY -OWNED STRUCTURES AS PART OF A WIRELESS NETWORK IN CERRITOS TO PROVIDE HIGH-SPEED INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE Cerritos residents have expressed to the City their frustration with the limited availability of high-speed Internet access service in the community. As the City Council is aware, Verizon americast does not offer cable modem service in Cerritos. Despite the City's repeated written and verbal requests for cable modem service, the company stated it would not make the investment necessary to upgrade its system since it was attempting to exit the cable television business. The company Knology Broadband of California, Inc. recently acquired the system and has not yet planned an upgrade. In addition, some homes in Cerritos are unable to obtain DSL service due to their distance from a Verizon central office or inadequate telephone line quality. In response to the requests from Cerritos residents, the City Council has directed staff during the past several years to research methods of making high-speed Internet access available in the community. On October 24, 1996 the City Council approved a proposal by Metricom to install a wireless network and radio transmitters in Cerritos to provide Internet access. The City reported the upcoming launch of Metricom's wireless Internet access service Ricochet in the October 2000 issue of "The Cerritos News." Metricom filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in July 2001 and subsequently canceled the Ricochet service in Cerritos. The City Council received a report titled "Review of Cable Modem Status and Other High - Speed Internet Access Services" on April 22, 1999. A follow up "Report on High -Speed Internet Access Services and Evaluation of Improvements Required for Cerritos Cable Television System to Offer Cable Modem Service" was presented to the City Council on March 8, 2000. This year, the City has written to Verizon americast urging the company to again consider offering cable modem service. The City also wrote to Verizon Communications Inc. t0 share Consideration of a Proposal by Aiirnet to Install a Wireless Network for Internet Service November 24, 2003 Page 2 residents' disappointment with their inability to obtain DSL service in areas of Cerritos. Verizon representatives met with the City in July 2003 and the company was able to resolve technical issues for some customers, but other residents' homes were deemed too far from a central office to receive service. Verizon also indicated the company would consider the addition of equipment in Cerritos to make DSL more widely available when planning future capital improvement projects. In October 2003, Verizon said a new GoDigital product, which extends the reach of DSL service, will be made available in Cerritos in January 2004. In the fall of 2002, news media reports stated the Ricochet wireless Internet access service had been reactivated in Denver, Colorado and in San Diego, California by a company called Aerie .Networks: On October -3172002, City staff contacted Aerie Networks and asked the company to consider reactivating the Ricochet service in Cerritos. City staff then sent Cerritos demographic information and computer usage statistics to Aerie Networks to encourage the company to enter the Cerritos market. The City and Aerie Networks continued discussions until February 2003 when the company concluded it did not have sufficient resources to reactivate the Cerritos Ricochet service. In March 2003 the City was contacted by Frank Saya and John Griebling, former Aerie Networks and Ricochet employees, who described their plan to start a new wireless broadband service. Cerritos' demographics, high rate of computer usage and limited broadband access made it an attractive location to launch the new service. Mr. Saya and Mr. Griebling partnered with the Woodland Hills -based venture capital firm Global Marketing Partners, Inc. to form a new company called Aiirnet Wireless, LLC. FINDINGS Aiirnet has proposed the installation of low -frequency radio transmitters throughout Cerritos which would link to the Internet through wired connections located in Cerritos, La Mirada and possibly Artesia. Customers would connect to the Internet through wireless fidelity (Wi-Fi) 802.11b technology. The speed of the service would be comparable to DSL or cable modem services. Aiirnet representatives have stated "Cerritos is the chosen market to become the first and largest unwired community wide Internet service in the country." Aiirnet would use a variety of facilities to deploy its distributed wireless mesh micro -cell network. These facilities would include the City's traffic intersection safety lights, City building rooftops, and ball field light poles at City parks. Pending agreements with the appropriate individuals, companies and organizations, Aiirnet would also utilize streetlights, school district buildings, commercial buildings and residences. Some 20 micro -cell radios per square mile could be required to provide ubiquitous indoor and outdoor coverage. A photo of a micro -cell radio is attached. In larger office buildings, coverage indoors might require indoor network equipment to fill coverage holes or provide additional capacity in areas with higher user density. Aiirnet's business plan is to serve the residential market with a Wi-Fi based form of broadband access that will serve as an alternative to DSL. The Aiirnet Community Broadband service would be unique because it would also be portable, and may be used anywhere in the community. Aiirnet would also offer its service to businesses, the City, public utility companies and public safety agencies. A wide range of computers and operating systems can be used with the Aiirnet service. Any standard Wi-Fi (80211.b or 802.11g) device may be used to connect to the Aiirnet network. These devices are available from such retailers as Best Buy and Office Max, or through on- t, Consideration of a Proposal by Alimet to Install a Wireless Network for Internet Service November 24, 2003 Page 3 line merchants Amazon.com or Page Computers. The specific computers and operating systems customers may use to connect to the network will vary depending on the type of device used by the customer and if applicable, the operating system software drivers supported by the Wi-Fi equipment manufacturer. Typical Wi-Fi devices include Ethernet adapters, USB adapters, PCI cards, PCMCIA cards, compact flash cards and embedded Wi-Fi modules. Residential customers connecting multiple computers in their home to Aiirnet's service would possibly be required to purchase a device such as the ZyXel ZyAIR B-420 Wi-Fi access point and router. Prior to a citywide launch, Aiirnet would train sales staff at the focal Office Depot, Staples and Gateway Country stores, as well as independent computer -equipment resellers, on the type of equipment needed for use with Aiirnet service. Aiirnet would not install the service or equipment in customers' homes. Customers could purchase equipment at local stores or through the Internet, and install the service themselves, or hire an Aiirnet certified installer agent. Residents could contract with the independent certified installer agents for home network design, installation, configuration and support services. Customer service would be offered 24 hours a day, seven days a week through a toll-free telephone number. Tier 1 customer service would provide technical assistance with installing and configuring typical Wi-Fi client devices for common computer systems. This tier would also provide customer service for billing, product and service questions. Tier 2 customer service would be available for escalation of Tier 1 issues. Tier 2 service would be available during regular business hours. For severe issues, the Tier 2 service would be available at any time of day. Local field operations support for network infrastructure installation and maintenance support would be available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to restore service during network outages. Aiirnet would provide several layers of security for system users. All users of Aiirnet services would be authenticated before being permitted to connect to the network. Internet traffic would also be routed through security gateways at the edge of the Aiirnet network. The security gateways would provide firewall features to monitor and prevent unauthorized external access to the Aiirnet network. Additionally, Aiirnet would use an intrusion detection system to monitor traffic on the network and identify and respond to unauthorized attempts to access the network. Aiirnet would not implement virus -protection software on subscribers' computers. Subscribers would also be responsible for installing Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) security features if they are using a wireless network in their homes. Subscribers could contract with the independent certified installer agents to install firewalls and virus - protection software. Aiirnet has provided the following information about service plans for residents and businesses. The company has stated the features and pricing for these service plans are not yet finalized. Service Plan Recurring Charge Activation Fee Installation Fee ' Equipment Fee AilrLink At-HQnneT $39.99 per none $99.99 $99.99 Downlink Speed; up to Monthly Consideration of a Proposal by Aiirnet to Install a Wireless Network for Internet Service November 24, 2003 Page 4 Subscription Annual Prepaid Subscription month $29.99 per month (prepaid annually) none $99.99 (Ethernet Adapter) $99.99 (Ethernet Adapter) 500 Kbps Uplink Speed: up to 250 Kbps Customer or local certified installer agents install and activation. Ethernet adapter required to establish demarcation for AiirLink At -Homer'''. AlirLink II-1ownr" $4.99 per hour $8.99 per day $17.99 per week $39.99 per month $29.99 per month (prepaid annually) none none none none none none none none none none none none none none none Downlink Speed: up to .,Sac Kbps Uplink Speed: up to 250 Kbps Customer self -install and activation. Any standard Wi-Fi (802.11b or 802.11g) client device or Ethernet adapter may be used to connect. Hourly Subscription Daily Subscription Weekly Subscription Monthly Subscription Annual Prepaid Subscription AiirLink Business $249.99 per month $249.99 per month $249.99 per month $99.99 none none $149.99 none none $499.99 $499.99 none Downlink Speed; up to 1 Mbps symmetric. Installation and customer purchased equipment required. Includes one (1) AiirLink In-TownT monthly subscription at no charge. Eel Monthly Subscription 1 Year Contract 2 Year Contract Aiirnet has stated the speeds listed above for the various services are objectives and not exact. The approximate speeds are based on engineering performance estimates for the technology and anticipated network load. Speeds would also vary based on the service plan, the customer's location when using the service, and the type of client device the customer is using to access the network. Speeds would not be contractually guaranteed for any of the services. Aiirnet would provide a Service Level Agreement (SLA) for the Business Pro product which will give the customer specific rights to obtain credits In the event of network outages and the right to cancel the service if it does not consistently meet advertised performance levels. Based on demand and customer usage patterns, Aiirnet may offer additional services and packages in the future. Examples of future possible features include e-mail, personal web space, remote storage and backup, multiple -account bundles and lower speed services. Aiirnet has conducted a beta test of its service in two areas within Cerritos. One test area is located in the southern portion of Cerritos near Coyote Creek and the border with La Palma. Verizon's DSL service is unavailable in this neighborhood. The second test area is located in a northern portion of the City near Cerritos Park East. City staff attended a demonstration test of the service in both areas. The service connected successfully at high speeds, but did exhibit problems which are characteristic of Wi-Fi technology. As part of the test, the City Council meeting video archive was accessed through the Cerritos web site. The video stream ran smoothly at one home, but displayed a buffering Consideration of a Proposal by Aiirnet to Install a Wireless Network for Internet Service November 24, 2003 Page 5 effect at another home. The connection lacked the speed and consistency necessary to continuously play the video. At the third home, some buffering was detected, but the overall performance was good. Staff also distributed a survey to the 10 Cerritos residents whose households participated in the beta test of Aiirnet's service. The respondents' replies are attached and included positive reports about the service. The beta testers described the service as excellent or good and said they were pleased to have access to a broadband service. Most respondents stated they would subscribe to the service if it became available beyond the beta test. Aiirnet plans to deploy the network and offer service throughout Cerritos in phases. The timeline for deployment would begin upon the City Council's approval of the attached Attachment Permit Agreement. In Phase 1, Aiirnet would deploy the service with 80 percent coverage in outdoor public areas throughout Cerritos. Phase I would also include coverage in neighborhoods which currently do not have broadband access, including the southern beta test area. Coverage is also planned for the retail portions of the Cerritos Towne Center. In addition, Phase 1 would offer service to business customers seeking an alternative to DSL or Ti line service. Aiirnet would also accommodate the City's request for service at public facilities during this phase. Aiirnet would plan to launch the service commercially starting January 1, 2004. Phase 2 would begin 60 days after Aiirnet launches commercial service in Cerritos. Phase 2 would incrementally expand the more dense indoor residential and business coverage on demand. Phase 3 would begin once Aiirnet secures an agreement with Southern California Edison to attach its radio transmitters to streetlights in Cerritos. Phase 3 would provide complete citywide dense indoor coverage. Aiirnet has stated its original plan to deploy service throughout Cerritos neighborhoods has been derailed by the extremely high charges Southern California Edison is requiring for attachments to its streetlight poles. Aiirnet has indicated to the City that SCE has demanded Aiirnet pay an attachment fee that would be impossible to recover with the service fees Aiirnet plans to charge its subscribers. City staff met with SCE representatives and asked the company to reconsider its fee in the interest of providing the community with an opportunity to obtain broadband access. An SCE representative replied the company would not accommodate the City's request. Aiirnet has reported the company's management team has had extensive involvement in Internet engineering and communications since the inception of the Internet, dating to the original National Science Foundation network and original bulletin board system. The team has been founders or held executive positions in development, engineering, sales, marketing and finance for some of the nations largest communications companies. They have been key contributors to the establishment of companies Mustang Software, Inc. (Wildcat BBS), Prodigy, Netcom, Mindspring, Qwest Communications, Levet 3, Riverstone Networks, Ricochet Networks, MFS Communications, GeoNet, Compression Labs, ROLM Communications and Global Marketing Partners. The City has made a sustained, Tong-term effort to improve the availability of high-speed Internet access in Cerritos. Staff has worked with Alirnet to facilitate the launch of its service in Cerritos in an attempt to achieve the goal of widely available broadband service. City staff proposes allowing Aiirnet to attach radio transmitters free-of-charge to City-owned structures and traffic signal safety lights. Once the Aiirnet service is operational throughout Cerritos, Consideration of a Proposal by Aiirnet to Install a Wireless Network for Internet Service November 24, 2003 Page 6 the City would obtain 60 subscriptions at a cost of $34.95 per month. The City obtained a legal opinion about this arrangement and was informed it was acceptable. In addition, the City Attorney's Office has reviewed the Attachment Permit Agreement. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Attachment Permit Agreement between the City of Cerritos and Aiirnet Wireless, LLC. Ah Attachments City of Cerritos Attachment Permit Agreement This Attachment Permit Agreement (the "Permit") is dated as of November 24, 2003 and entered into by and between the CITY OF CERRITOS, a California municipal corporation (the "City") and Aiirnet Wireless, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company ("Aiirnet"). Recitals A. Under California law the City has the right and power to regulate the time, location and manner of attachment, installation, operation and maintenance of wireless digital communications radios in the public right-of-way within the limits of the City. B. Aiirnet wishes to attach, install, operate and maintain a wireless digital communications radio network on facilities located in the public right-of-way for purposes of operating a wireless digital communications radio network (the "Network"). Agreement Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to the following covenants, terms and conditions: 1 Definitions. The following definitions shall apply generally to the provisions of this agreement: 1.1 Agency. "Agency" means any govemmental or quasi -governmental agency other than the City, including the FCC and the PUC (as such terms are defined below). 1.2 City. Unless otherwise noted, "City" means the City of Cerritos, California or the Cerritos Redevelopment Agency. 1.3 City Property. "City Property" means City -owned poles or other City - owned property, whether located within or outside of the Public Right of Way, including (without limitation) City -owned street light poles, traffic safety lights, illuminated street sign poles, and light poles in City ballparks and other public parks. As used herein, the term City Property shall also include buildings and edifices owned by the City. The term City Property shall not indude any decorative City -owned poles of any type. 1.4 Effective Date. "Effective Date" means the date on which Aiirnet hangs Its first Radio on the permanent network as provided below, or, if earlier, the date on which this Permit is finally approved by the City Council of Cerritos. 1.5 FCC. "FCC" means the Federal Communications Commission. 1.6 Fee. "Fee" means any assessment, license, charge, fee, imposition, tax (but excluding any utility users' tax or franchise fees), or levy of general City of Cerritos Attachment Permit Agreement AiiRNET Wireless, LLC Page 2 application to Persons doing business in the City lawfully imposed by any governmental body. 1.7 Laws. "Laws" means any and all statutes, constitutions, ordinances, resolutions, regulations, judicial decisions, rules, tariffs, administrative orders, certificates, orders or other requirements of the City or other governmental agency having joint or several jurisdiction over the parties to this Permit, in effect either at the time of execution of this Permit or at any time during the presence of Radios on the Public Right of Way. 1.8 Alirnet. "Aiirnet" means Aiirnet Wireless, LLC, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and its lawful successors, assigns and transferees. 1.9 PUC. "PUC" means the California Public Utilities Commission. 1.10 Permit. "Permit" means this nonexclusive Attachment Permit Agreement and may also refer to the associated right to encroach upon the public right-of-way conferred hereunder. 1.11 Person. "Person" means an individual, corporation, a limited liability company, a general or limited partnership, a sole proprietorship, a joint venture, a business trust, or any other form of business entity or association. 1.12 Provision. "Provision" means any agreement, clause, condition, covenant, qualification, restriction, reservation, term or other stipulation in the Permit that defines or otherwise controls, establishes, or limits the performance required or permitted by any party to this Permit. All Provisions, whether covenants or conditions, shall be deemed to be both covenants and conditions. 1.13 Public Right of Way. "Public Right of Way" means in, upon, above, along, across and over the public streets, roads, lanes, courts, ways, alleys, boulevards, and places, including all public utility easements and public service easements as the same now or may hereafter exist that are under the jurisdiction of the City. This term shall not include any property owned by any Person or Agency other than the City except as provided by applicable Laws pursuant to an agreement between the City and any such Person or Agency or pursuant to an easement, dedication, or other property interest granted in favor of the City. 1.14 Radio Month. "Radio Month" means a calendar month during which a Radio occupies space on a piece of City Property, even if such occupancy is less than the entire month. 1.15 Radio. "Radio" means the radio equipment, whether referred to singly or collectively, to be installed and operated by Ailmet hereunder and more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto. 1.16 Services. "Services" means the wireless digital communications services provided by Aiirnet to subscribers with billing addresses within the City. City of Cerritos Attachment Permit Agreement AiiRNEf Wireless, LLC Page 4 existence and operation of any and all public and private rights of way, sanitary sewers, water mains, storm drains, gas mains, poles, aerial and underground electrical and telephone wires, electroliers, cable television, and other wired telecommunications, City and public safety telecommunications systems. Aiirnet warrants that all usage will be in compliance with FCC regulations. 3.4 Compliance with Laws. Aiirnet shall comply with all applicable Laws in the exercise and performance of its rights and obligations under this Permit. 3.5 Modification of Service Voltage. The City reserves the right to modify the service voltage delivered to or at any street light pole or utility pole on which a -Radio -may -be -located. Aiimet shall replace or modify any Radio that will be affected by such voltage modifications within thirty (30) days of receiving prior written notice of voltage modifications. In the event that Aiirnet fails to replace or modify any Radio within the thirty -day notice period before the voltage modification, the City may disconnect any such Radio until Aiimet performs and completes the necessary work and advises City accordingly. 4. City Subscription to Service. The City of Cerritos will obtain 60 subscriptions from Aiirnet. 4.1 Adequate Service Quality. Aiirnet's wireless Internet service must provide a minimum transmission speed of 400 Kbps per user or the City may cancel its 60 subscriptions with 30 days notice. 4.2 License Restrictions. City shall use all subscriptions and equipment provided pursuant to this § 4 solely for its own use, and shall not be entitled to resell, distribute or otherwise permit the use of the same by any other party. 4.3 Subscriber Threshold. The City may cancel its 60 Aiimet service subscriptions with 30 days notice once Aiirnet has gained 600 paying subscribers with addresses located in the City of Cerritos. 5. Potential Utility Users' Tax. Aiimet acknowledges and agrees that the City may require users of revenue-producing services such as the Services to pay a utility users' tax ("Utility Tax") to the City pursuant to City's Municipal Code. If the City determines that the Services are subject to the Utility Tax, Aiirnet agrees to collect the tax from Service users and remit such tax to the City in accordance with City'S Municipal Code. 6. Removal and Relocation of Radios. City understands and acknowledges that Aiimet will be deploying a wireless mesh network that requires, from time to time, the installation of additional radios, replacement of radios and relocation of radios to maintain or enhance network performance and service to the City, residents, and businesses using the network: (a) The City will make best effort to provide additional locations as outlined in paragraph 6.1; (b) prior to authorizing installation of other wireless equipment on City Owned property by a third party, the City will provide Aiimet a ninety (90) day review period to assess interference City of.Cerritos Attachment Permit Agreement AiiRNET Wireless, LLC Page 5 impacts or determine the need for that location to improve or maintain capacity and network performance standards. Aiirnet understands and acknowledges that City may require Aiirnet to relocate one or more of its Radios, and Aiirnet shall promptly at City's direction relocate such Radios at Aiirnet's sole cost and expense, whenever City reasonably determines that the relocation is needed for any of the following purposes: (a) to facilitate or accommodate the construction, completion, repair, relocation or maintenance of a City project or one undertaken by its redevelopment agency, if any; (b) because the Radio is interfering with or adversely affecting proper operation of City light poles, traffic signals or other City facilities where an Aiirnet Radio is attached; or (c) to project or preserve the public health, safety or welfare. If Aiirnet shall fail to relocate any Radios as -requested by -the City in accordance with the foregoing - provision, City shall be entitled to relocate the Radios at Aiirnet's sole cost and expense, without further notice to Aiirnet. 6.1 Aiirnet Desires Relocation. In the event Aiimet desires to relocate any Radios from one piece of City Property to another piece of City Property, Aiirnet shall so advise City in accordance with § 8. City will use its best efforts to accommodate Aiirnet by making another functionally equivalent piece of City• Property available for use in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Permit, with particular reference to the requirements of § 3.1. 6.2 Discontinuation of Service. In the event that any Radio subject to this Permit is abandoned and no longer placed in service for a period of six (6) months or more, Aiirnet promptly shall notify the City, and the City, at its option, may require Aiimet promptly to remove the abandoned Radio(s) at Aiirnet's sole cost and expense or dedicate the same to the City. The City shall not remove or dedicate the radios, unless and until the City first gives fifteen (15) days' prior written notice to Aiirnet. If Aiirnet shall fall to remove the Radios as required by the City, the City shall be entitled to remove the Radios at Alirnet's sole cost and expense. Aiimet shall execute such documents of title as will convey all right, title and interest in the abandoned Radios, but in no other Aiirnet property, intellectual or otherwise, to the City. 6.3 Damage to Right -of -Way. Whenever the removal or relocation of Radios is required under this Permit, and if during such removal or relocation any City Property is damaged, Aiirnet, at its sole cost and expense, shall promptly repair and return such City Property upon which the Radios are located to an original and satisfactory condition in accordance with applicable Laws and subject to the reasonable approval of the City's Director of Public Works, normal wear and tear excepted. If Aiirnet does not repair the site as just described, then the City shall have the option to perform or cause to be performed such reasonable and necessary work on behalf of Aiirnet and to charge Aiirnet for the proposed costs to be incurred or the actual costs incurred by the City at City's standard rates. Upon the receipt of a demand for payment by the City, Aiirnet shall reimburse the City for such costs. 7. Encroachment or Other Permit. In the event that the attachment, installation, operation, or maintenance of Radios shall require any construction work in the Public Right of Way, Aiirnet shall apply for and obtain the appropriate City of Cerritos Attachment Permit Agreement AiiRNET Wireless, LLC Page 6 encroachment or other permits required by Law prior to the attachment, installation, operation or maintenance of any such Radios. 8. As -Built Documentation. Upon the completion of the installation of any. Radio(s), Aiirnet promptly shall furnish to the City, in hard copy and in Aiimet's electronic format, suitable documentation showing the exact location of the Radios in the Public Right of Way. 9. indemnification. Aiirnet agrees to indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), protect, and hold harmless the City, its council members, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, fines, charges, penalties, administrative and judicial proceedings and orders, Judgments, -remedial -actions of any kind, all costs and cleanup actions of any kind, and all costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of defense (collectively, the "Losses") arising, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, out of the entry by the parties into this permit or activities or facilities described in this Permit, including (without limitation) Aiirnet's equipment and Radios, the installation, relocation, and/or removal activities, any and all Aiirnet operations, including (without limitation) health, safety, environmental, or hazard claims, the City Property, and infrastructure of all kinds, except to the extent arising from or caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its council members, officers, employees, agents, or contractors. 9.1 Waiver of Breach. The waiver by the City of any breach or violation of any Provision of this Permit by Aiirnet shall not be deemed to be a waiver or a continuing waiver by the City of any subsequent breach or violation of the same or any other Provision of this Permit by Aiirnet. 9.2 Waiver of Claims. Aiirnet waives any and all claims, demands, causes of action, and rights it may assert against the City on account of any loss, damage, or injury to any Radio or any loss or degradation of the Services as a result of a sudden or gradual loss or change of electrical power caused by, among other things, any of the following: an Act of God; an event or occurrence which is beyond the reasonable control of the City; a power outage; a lightning strike; a modification of City -supplied service voltage; the City's right to require the removal or relocation of Radios pursuant to § 7; or damage occasioned by the installation, maintenance, replacement, or relocation of any City -owned facility or third -party -owned facility to which such Radios attached. 9.3 Limitation of City's Liability. The City shall be liable only for the cost of repair to damaged Radios arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of City or its employees or agents, and the City shall not be responsible for any damages, losses, or liability of any kind occurring by reason of the acts of third parties or by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the City or by any third party, including damages, losses, lost profits, consequential damages or liability arising from the issuance or approval by the City of a permit to any third party or any interruption in Services. 10. Insurance. Aiirnet shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this Permit comprehensive general liability insurance and comprehensive automobile t City of Cerritos Attachment Permit Agreement AiiRNE i' Wireless, LLC Page 7 liability insurance protecting Aiirnet in an amount of not Tess than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence (combined single limit), including bodily injury and • property damage, and in an amount of not Tess than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) aggregate for each personal injury liability, products -completed operations, and each accident. Such insurance shall name the City, its council members, officers, employees, and agents as additional insureds as respects any liability arising out of Aiirnet's performance under or taking the benefits of this Permit. Coverage shall be provided in accordance with the limits specified and the Provisions indicated herein. Claims -made policies are not acceptable. When an umbrella or excess coverage is in effect, coverage shall be provided in the aforesaid form. Such insurance shall not be canceled or materially altered to reduce coverage until the City has received at least thirty (30) days' advance written notice of such cancellation or change.-Aiirnet shall -be responsiblefor-notifying-the City of such change or cancellation. Aiirnet further covenants and agrees that it will not permit any 'gap' in insurance coverages required hereunder to occur at any time during the term hereof, unless such insurance becomes commercially unobtainable or unavailable and the City has been given at least thirty (30) days' advance written notice of such unavailability. In any such case, the City shall have the right to terminate this Permit upon at least twenty (20) days' advance written notice to Aiimet. 10.1 Required Certificates of Insurance. Aiirnet shall file the required original certificate(s) of insurance with endorsements with the City, subject to the City's prior approval, which shall clearly state all of the following: (a) Policy number; name of insurance company; name, address, and telephone number of the agent or authorized representative; name, address, and telephone number of insured; project name and address; policy expiration date; and specific coverage amounts; (b) A provision stating that the insurer would endeavor to provide thirty (30) days' prior notice of cancellation to the City; and (c) A provision stating that Alimet's insurance is primary as respects any other valid or collectible insurance that the City may possess, including any self-insured retentions the City may have; and any other insurance the City does possess shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not be required to contribute with this insurance; and (d) The City, its council members, officers, employees, and agents are named as additional insureds as respects any liability arising out of Aiimet's performance under or taking the benefits of this Permit. The certificate(s) of insurance with endorsements and notices, shall be mailed to the City at the address specified in § 12 below: 10.2 Workers' Compensation Insurance. Aiimet shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this Permit statutory workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance in such other amounts as required by California law, and shall furnish the City with a certificate showing proof of such coverage, when required by California law. City of Cerritos Attachment Permit Agreement AIIRNET Wireless, LLC Page 8 10.3 Insurer Criteria. Any insurance provider of Aiirnet shall be admitted and authorized to do business in California and shall be rated at least A:X in A.M. Best & Company's Insurance Guide. Insurance certificates issued by non -admitted insurance companies are not acceptable. 10.4 Severability of Interest. "Cross liability," "severability of interest," or "separation of insureds" clauses shall be made a part of the comprehensive general liability and comprehensive automobile liability policies. 10.5 Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles and/or self-insured retentions greater than $50,000 must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate any deductible or self-insured retention -as respect --the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers or Aiirnet shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation, claim administration and defense expenses. 10.6 Subcontractors. Aiirnet shall provide and maintain that all of its subcontractors maintain the programs of insurance specified in this Permit. 11. Notices. All notices which shall or may be given pursuant to this Permit shall be in writing and delivered personally or transmitted (a) through the United States mail, by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid; (b) by means of prepaid overnight delivery service; or (c) by facsimile transmission, if a hard copy of the same is followed by delivery through the U.S. mail or by overnight delivery service as just described, addressed as follows: if to the City: City of Cerritos Attn: Director of Public Works 18125 Bloomfield Avenue P.O. Box 3130 Cerritos, CA 90703-3130 If to Aiirnet: AIIRNET WIRELESS, LLC 20335 Ventura Blvd. Suite 425, Woodland Hills, CA 91364 Telephone: (818)673-1897 Notices shall be deemed given upon receipt in the case of personal delivery, three (3) days after deposit in the mail, or the next day in the case of overnight delivery. Either party may from time to time designate any other address for this purpose by written notice to the other party delivered in the manner set forth above. 12. Termination. This Permit may be terminated by either party upon forty-five (45) days' prior written notice to the other party upon a default of any material covenant, bankruptcy, whether voluntary or involuntary by Aiirnet, or term hereof by such other party, which default is not cured within forty-five (45) days of receipt of written notice of default (or, if such default is not curable within forty-five (45) days, City of Cerritos Attachment Permit Agreement AiiRNET Wireless, LLC Page 9 if the defaulting party fails to commence such cure within forty-five (45) days or fails thereafter diligently to prosecute such cure to completion), provided that the grace period for any monetary default shall be ten (10) days from receipt of notices. (In any such case, Aiimet shall remove its Radios at its sole cost and expense as provided in § 5 above and shall restore affected Public Property to the extent required under § 5.3. 13. Assignment. This Permit shall not be assigned by Aiirnet without the express written consent of the City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Any attempted assignment in violation of this § 14 shall be void. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the transfer of the rights and obligations of Aiirnet hereunder to a parent, subsidiary, or other affiliate of Aiimet, or to any successor -in -interest or entity acquiring fifty-one percent (51%) or more -of --Ali net's stock or assets, shall not be deemed an assignment or transfer for.the purposes of this Permit, provided that any such transferee will have a financial strength after the proposed transfer at least equal to that of Aiirnet prior to the transfer, shall acquire such interest in or control of Aiimet with the intent of and for the purpose of operating the System as a continuing business concern operating in the same or similar fashion as prior to such transfer and, if requested by the City, gives the City reasonable assurances of such intent and capability and such successor in Interest entity agrees in writing to terms, conditions and obligations created by this permit. If any proposed transferee will have a financial strength after the proposed transfer at least equal to that of Aiirnet prior to the transfer, it shall not be deemed reasonable for the City to withhold its consent to the proposed transfer unless the proposed transferee has a record of performance under similar agreements which is unacceptable to the City under a reasonable standard of evaluation. Lack of prior specific experience in administering a system providing the Services described in this Permit shall not, by itself, be deemed a reasonable basis for refusing or conditioning the City's consent. Aiimet shall give to the City thirty (30) days' prior written notice of any transfer, which notice shall include the name of any proposed transferee and such evidence as the City may reasonably require of such transferee's ability to perform under this Permit. Any transferee shall be subject to all the terms and provisions of this Permit, including the insurance requirements specified above. In any case where the City's consent is required for a transfer of this Permit, the City's consent shall be conditioned upon the transferee's compliance with such insurance requirements. 14. Miscellaneous Provisions. The provisions which follow shall apply generally to the obligations of the parties under this Permit. 14.1 Nonexclusive Use. City understands that Aiirnet will be operating in licensed or unlicensed (for which no license from the FCC is required) band of the frequency spectrum. Ailmet understands that this Permit does not provide Aiirnet with exclusive use of any City Property and that City shall have the right to permit other providers of telecommunications services to Install equipment or devices on City Property; however, City agrees promptly to notify Aiirnet of the receipt of a proposal for the installation of communications equipment or devices on City Property, regardless of whether a license is required by the FCC for the operation thereof. In addition, City agrees to advise such other providers of telecommunications services of the presence or planned deployment of the Radios on City Property. City of Cerritos Attachment Permit Agreement .AiiRNET Wireless, LLC Page 10 14.2 Amendment of Permit. This Permit may not be amended except pursuant to a written instrument signed by both parties . 14.3 Severability of Provisions. If any one or more of the Provisions of this Permit Shall be held by court of competent jurisdiction in a final judicial action to be void, voidable, or unenforceable, such Provision(s) shall be deemed severable from the remaining Provisions of this Permit and shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Permit. 14.4 All -Hours Contact. Aiirnet shall be available to the staff employees of any City department having jurisdiction over Aiirnet's activities twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week, regarding problems or complaints __ .__.____resulting from the attachment, installation, operation, maintenance, or removal of the Radios. The City may contact by telephone the network control center operator at telephone number (303) 378-5456 regarding such problems or complaints. 14.5 Power Restoration and Repairs. The City agrees that, in the case of loss of power or repairs to damaged City facilities carrying Aiimet radios or equipment, to give best -effort prioritization to restore such facility and return power or facility to previous condition. 14.6 Governing Law; Jurisdiction. This Permit shall be governed and construed by and in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In the event that suit is brought by a party to this Permit, the parties agree that trial of such action shall be vested exclusively in the state courts of California, County of Los Angeles, or in the United States District Court, Central District of California in the County of Los Angeles. 14.7 Attorneys' Fees. Should any dispute arising out of this Permit lead to litigation, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorneys' fees and expert witness fees. 14.8 Exhibits. All exhibits referred to in this Permit and any addenda, attachments, and schedules which may from time to time be referred to in any duly executed amendment to this Permit are by such reference incorporated in this Permit and shall be deemed a part of this Permit. 14.9 Successors and Assigns. This Permit is binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 14.10 Rules, Regulations, and Specifications. Aiimet acknowledges that the City may develop rules, regulations, and specifications for the attachment, installation, and removal of Radios and any similar purpose radios on City Property, and such rules, regulations, and specifications, and when finalized, shall govern Aiirnet's activities hereunder as If they were in effect at the time this Permit was executed by the City; provided, however, that in no event shall such rules, regulations or specifications materially interfere with or affect Atirnet's right to install Radios, or Aiirnet's ability to transmit or receive radio signals from Radios installed, pursuant to and in accordance with this Permit, and shall not materially Increase Aiirnet's obligations hereunder. City of Cerritos Attachment Permit Agreement AiiRNET Wireless, LLC Page 11 14.11 Advice of Displacement. To the extent the City has actual knowledge thereof, the City will attempt to inform Aiirnet of the displacement of any pole on which any Radio is located. 14.12 Consent Criteria. Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, in any case where the approval or consent of one party hereto is required, requested, or otherwise to be given under this Permit, such party shall not unreasonably delay or withhold its approval or consent. 14.13 Independent Contractor Status. Aiirnet is an independent contractor. This Permit is not intended and shall not be construed to create the -relationship of agent, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association as between City and Aiimet, Aiirnet's employees, agents, and subcontractors or the subcontractors' employees and agents. The employees and agents of one party are not the employees and agents or the other party for any purpose whatsoever. Aiirnet shall be solely liable and responsible for providing all compensation and benefits to, or on behalf of, all persons performing work pursuant to this Permit. The City shall have no liability or responsibility for the payment of any salaries, wages, unemployment benefits, disability benefits, Federal, State or local taxes, or other compensations, benefits or taxes for any personnel provided by or on behalf of Aiimet. Aiimet agrees to indemnify, defend with counsel acceptable to the City and hold City harmless for any action or proceeding regarding the subject of this provision. 14.14 Entire Agreement. This Permit contains the entire understanding between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein- There are no representations, agreements or understandings (whether oral or written) between or among the parties relating to the subject matter of this Permit which are not fully expressed herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. City: CITY OF CERRITOS, a Califomia municipal corporation By: [name typed] Its: Aiirnet Aiirnet Wireless, LLC., a Delaware corporation By: ...In partnership with the Michigan Broadband Development Authority, the Michigan Economic Development Corporation and the Michigan State Housing Development Authority Request for Proposals Digital Divide Investment Program HSIIDA parameters. Also, this pricing is for residential customers only. Market pricing for business customers is left up to the discretion of the service provider. 1.5 Program Funding Priorities Vendors are asked to identify their expenditures and outline the type of connections and new investment necessary for them to extend broadband service to households in the investment area—breaking out and allocating separate costs for the eligible grant communities. Selection, in part, will be determined by the proposed monthly end user charges along with estimated quality of service, marketing plans for LMI households and total project investment among other factors. Selected vendors -must -also -guarantee a monthly user price ceiling to residential customers only for at least 3 years (from the date service is activated in the entire investment area). Failure to maintain such a residential price ceiling will result in breech and require the vendor to return all grant and loan monies in full. 2.0 Loan Application To qualify for this grant program, an MBDA loan application (for the capital needs of the investment area) must be received by the MBDA. A copy of the Investment Area Loan Application can be found in Appendix B. It can be accessed electronically at NOTE: Applicants must submit an application for MBDA financing in addition to submitting the DDIP proposal to the County. To assure confidentiality, the Investment Area Loan Application should be sent separately to the Michigan Broadband Development Authority—see Section 4 below. 3.0 Award Information One hundred percent of the connection expenses associated with bringing service into an eligible grant community and LMI residences are potentially reimbursable. These expenditures can include last mile and customer premise equipment expenses as well as an allocable portion of local loop and/or backhaul fees that support service in the eligible grant communities. A lump sum reimbursement will be made based upon the survey information for these communities as outlined above. 3.1 Grant Award Amount/Loan Award Amount The maximum eligible grant award shall not exceed $2,216,000. The anticipated loan amount would, at a minimum, equal the amount proposed by the vendor as 5 new investment in the entire investment area. However, since the MBDA has the ability to lend for other purposes (refinancing etc.) the loan amount could be higher. There is NO cap on the loan amount a vendor may receive. 3.2 Type of Funding Instrument(s) The funding instrument will be in the form of an MBDA "Investment Area" loan and subsequent CDBG reimbursement for "Eligible Grant Communities" that lie within the "Investment Area." 3.3 Eligibility Information - .Eligible applicants include for-profit telecommunications providers of -any kind, - including but not limited to local exchange carriers, cable companies, satellite companies, wireless Internet service providers, or broadband over power -line carriers. 3.4 Cost Sharing Grant recipients under this program will be required to secure initial capitalization via an MBDA loan (which may also require an appropriate equity contribution depending upon the financial condition of the borrower) for all costs associated with constructing or upgrading their broadband network in the investment area and eligible grant communities. See MBDA loan application for additional loan eligibility requirements with regard to financial requirements (e.g., owner equity and other balance sheet items). 4.0 DDIP Proposal AND Loan Submission Information Applicant Submission: Completed DDIP Proposals (original, signed and in hard copy) must be received at the following address no later than 3:00p.m. Eastern Standard Time on Friday, January 14, 2005: Lynn Zatalokin Muskegon County Purchasing Office Central Services Building 141 East Apple Avenue Muskegon, MI 49442 231.724.6520 NO LATE DDIP PROPOSALS WILL BE ACCEPTED and 6 Completed Loan Applications (original, signed and in hard copy) must be received at the following address no later than 3:OOp.m. Eastem Standard Time on Friday, January 14, 2005: Robert Filka Chief Operating Officer MBDA 735 E. Michigan Avenue Lansing, MI 48912 517.241.2121 NO LATE LOAN APPLICATIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED Please note: We cannot ensure protection of sensitive loan application information unless the loan application is sent separately and directly to Robert Filka at the address above. DEADLINE: Both proposals and loan applications must be received at the above addresses no later than 3:OOp.m. Eastern Standard Time on Friday, January 14, 2005. NO LATE PROPOSALS OR LOAN APPLICATIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED. 4.1 Vendor Inquiry Mechanism All questions must be submitted electronically. They must be e-mailed to the following address: no later than December 10, 2004. All questions and answers will be posted at: 5.0 Content and Form of DDIP Proposals: All proposals must be submitted in hard copy form. Please submit one (1) original and three (3) copies of materials as outlined above. Each proposal must contain the following required elements: 1. Company Name (signature of company officer authorizing submission) 11. Company Address Street: City: State: Zip Code: Phone: Fax: 7 III. Company Lead Contact Name: Title: Direct Phone: Email: Fax: IV. Detailed Project Description—this should include: • Executive Summary/Project Narrative • Company background • Map • Detail type of technology to be used • Equipment vendors • Specific equipment list for proposed project grid • Speeds/capacity of services to be provided • Detailed network architecture • Continuing support and maintenance V. Estimated Project Budget -- A standardized budget form (Appendix D) is attached. • Provide estimates for entire investment area. • Breakout specific information pertaining to costs associated with eligible grant communities. • In instances where backhaul or other costs are supporting both eligible grant communities and non -eligible grant areas, allocate or distinguish the portion of such costs associated with each. • Provide timeline for completion, assuming award notification in mid - to late -February '05. Detail any constraints or timing issues that could impact installation. VI. Pricing • Describe end-user pricing plans for the entire investment area and how long you are willing to make service available at these prices if you are awarded a grant and loan via DDIP. VII. Describe plans for LMI customer marketing and retention. NOTE: If applicant does not submit a complete loan application to the MBDA, the applicant's DDIP Proposal will be rejected. 8 5.1 Confidentiality Request—FOR LOAN APPLICATION ONLY Because of the high level of public interest in projects supported by the CDBG program, the MBDA anticipates receiving requests for copies of successful applications. Applicants are hereby notified that the applications they submit are subject to the Michigan Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). To apply for confidentiality protection from the MBDA in accordance with the provision of section 6 (7) of the Michigan Broadband Development Authority Act for "trade secrets, commercial, financial or proprietary" information submitted to the Authority, you must complete the form (Appendix C) to specifically identify all information sought to be protected. Requests that identify the "entire application or proposal" will not be granted protection. If an entire document is requested to be granted confidentiality (such as an audit report or pro forma financial statements) it is not necessary to highlight or mark the entire record, however, the document should be specifically listed below and the category of its confidentiality indicated. if the project is approved, and the financing is provided through either the issuance of taxable -or tax exempt bonds offered through a public offering or a private placement, certain information may be deemed material and will be required to be disclosed in order to successfully market the offering. Applicants should also note that the above process applies only to confidentiality requests and FOIA requests submitted to the MBDA. These requests made to the applicable unit of general local government, other state agencies and the federal government will likely be responded to in a manner that differs significantly from the above. Therefore, your loan application should only be submitted to the MBDA. 6.0 Proposal Review Criteria A selection committee comprised of representatives from the designated county, MEDC, MBDA and MSHDA will analyze and rate each proposal using the following criteria. • Monthly end user rates • Quality of service in terms of capacity and speeds to end users • Plan for marketing services to LMI households • Project feasibility --proposed technology solution/network capacity for the region --financial viability of the vendor and ability to pay back MBDA loan • Project budget —ability to allocate and clearly distinguish eligible grant area costs • Total investment leveraged by grant 9 7.0 Award Notices and Timeline The selected vendor(s) will be notified in writing by the Michigan Broadband Development Authority and Muskegon County. It is anticipated that such notification will be provided in February 2005. RFP Issued• November 1, 2004 Questions Due December 10, 2004 DDIP Proposal and Loan Application Due January 14, 2005 Vendor Selected February 11, 2005 8.0 Final Review Process Dependent upon the nature of responses to this RFP, the DDIP Review Team may include a verification process with applicants before making a final vendor selection. 8.1 Right to Accept/Reject Proposals The Board of Commissioners of Muskegon County reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals, or to withdraw or cancel this RFP at its discretion at any time prior to the execution of a contract, or to waive any minor or technical deviations as it may deem fit and proper. It also reserves all rights granted to it by law, reserves the right to waive formalities and to take such action as it deems necessary in the best interest of Muskegon County. 9.0 Administrative and National Policy Requirements Standard rules governing the use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) will be followed. These include but are not limited to those listed below. 9.1 Environmental Review Prior to the commitment of any project funds, incurring any project costs, and state disbursement of grant funds, the Grantee (Muskegon County) shall submit to the State CDBG Grant Administrator (MBDA) a copy of the complete Environmental Review Record (including the Environmental Assessment), and secure written approval by the Grant Administrator of the Request for Release of Funds and Certification. The Request for Release of Funds and Certification represents local completion of the environmental review procedures and requirements as set forth in 24 CFR Part 58, "Environmental Review Procedures for Title 1 Community Development Block Grant Program," issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Project costs include costs to be paid by grant funds or other local, public or private funds. 10 9.2 Federal Labor Standards If the project involves construction activities using grant funds, the Grantee shall provide for approval by the Grant Administrator a copy of all bidding documents or other evidence of compliance with federal labor standards for all construction activities financed in whole or in part with CDBG funds. Such approval must be secured prior to state disbursement of grant funds for relevant construction activities. If the project involves the installation of machinery and/or equipment purchased with CDBG funds, and the cost to install the machinery and equipment is more than incidental (13% or more of the cost of the equipment), then federal labor .-----standardswill apply to the installation. Prior to disbursement of CDBG funds, the --- Grantee shall submit documentation indicating whether the cost of equipment installation is more than incidental. If the cost to install equipment is more than incidental, the Grantee shall provide evidence of compliance with federal labor standards. Please see for prevailing wage rates. 93 Uniform Relocation Act If the project involves acquisition of private real estate, permanent easements or right-of-ways, or the relocation of persons, families or farms, the Grantee shall provide for approval by the Grant Administrator documentation of compliance with the Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Such approval must be secured prior to state disbursement of grant funds for acquisition or relocation. 9.4 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility, Voluntary Exclusion Lower Tier Covered Transactions This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, 20 CFR Part 98, Section 98.510, Participants' Responsibilities. The regulations were published as Part VII of the May 26, 1988, Federal Register (pages 19160-19211). (1) The prospective recipient of federal assistance funds certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency. (2) Where the prospective recipient of federal assistance funds is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. 11 9.5 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Muskegon County operates on an equal opportunity/affirmative action basis in its quoting policy (Title Vll of Civil Rights Act of 1964, Equal Opportunity Clause, Executive Order 11246, Chapter 60, Subpart A, 60-1.4, Revised Order No. 4). Quoting is open to all interested parties in compliance with National, State and Local Laws. 12 SPEAKER SIGN-UP SHEET FOR WIFI SYSTEM — AGENDA ITEM 6.a. HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11, 2005 Please print your name clearly 1 On( l(6k/c4 2 VV" `tAk/ 3 ck \LA AP,(20,- 4 /44-F;yei-c),-E_ 5Qr J f ,qr(1 moi.✓.=,%► 6 7 -1 c_wR N -q t.6 8 9 11)6aP F--/t),114-in 10 ?j-Crs baMd1(__' 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 q.n Q. -t, oze) qe //ham S()//iivAL 11"" LA Cit of residence 0-g upigqiivich 19 ©hc()600 a/ 20 , )�A 1G C\Aow/9-6-cia silGC,kdz, `16 rcf-5 HE In Favor Opposed X (tc SPEAKER SIGN-UP SHEET FOR WIFI SYSTEM — AGENDA ITEM 6.a. HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11, 2005 Please print your name clearly City of residence In Favor Opposed 27% Ivo er V A-cs4cAi- 1W—A _; c ft. YS >C. 23 G / �/ �'IG�-�� ��J `7 24 ..) C- 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 SPEAKER SIGN-UP SHEET FOR WIFI SYSTEM — AGENDA ITEM 6.a. HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11, 2005 Please print your name clearly 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 City of residence In Favor Opposed ffermoa Art Foundation a non-profit. 501c3 or8anization 710 Pier Avcnuc, Iicrmom Bcach, California 90254 310-798-2100 Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members, RECEIVED DEC 1 6 2004 Per ............. December 2, 2004 The Board of Directors of the Hermosa Arts Foundation felt compelled to let our City council members know how excited we all are regarding the full City -Wide deployment of Internet signal. Your free'City-Wide Wi-Fi Project will be a great asset to our Community Center building and'our 501c3 non profit organization. We polled our board at a recent meeting and discussed uses and benefits to the building and all the programming that is housed at 710 Pier Avenue, known as "The Hermosa Beach Community Center" and, without any dissent we agreed to write this letter of support. We also know that other non -profits that use the building will be among the benefactors of such strong visionary leadership. The Hermosa Arts Foundation has money set aside to augment the City signal deployment to insure that signal is reached to all areas of the building. As you know, most organizations that use the community center are non-profit. This service will only expand the uses of the building, classrooms and physical plant. There are 100 + clients daily that benefit from the various programs and services offered here and a yes vote from you will insure that they are connected to the World Wide Web. The Internet has not only become an intregal part of all of all of our lives. Our group looks forward to the implementation of free wireless Internet signal at the Community Center and throughout our fine City. On behalf of our entire board, thank you in advance for your leadership and approval of the Free Wireless Internet Project. Sincerely, Aprrd L. Koenig v • esident Hermosa Arts Foundation CC: Board, File RLK/rlk SUPPLEMENTAL .6b INFORMATION Dear Hermosa Beach City Council Members; This letter is regarding the wireless issue. If time grows too short to read full document, please read pages 4 — 7 before voting. Thank You. Sincerely; Patrick McCormick Hermosa Beach SUPPLEMENTAL � 1 INFORMATION ID Patrick McCormick P.O. Box 3031 Redondo Beach, Ca. 90277 patmac@onebox.com 415-902-2982 January 11t 2005 Greetings, most honorable City Council of Hermosa Beach. I approach you this day to address this issue of municipal internet access. My partner Abra and I are social design consultants who create community enhancement and urban renewal programs that best emulate the spirit and character of a given city or neighborhood. Since 1994, I have also written letters for the King of Hawaii to various world -leaders, where we lived for 10 years before moving here. We came here in September of 2003 and liked it so much we decided to stay. Of all the areas in LA, we feel that Hermosa Beach best embodies what we want. With one of the most pristine beaches and a friendly neighbor -like attitude, this is truly one of those rare gems of a community. Upon hearing the Council consider free wireless internet access for all of Hermosa, we thought it very apropos for this beach -side community to provide that much needed service to its residents. For not only does it fulfill the original promise of special concessions for the people when they allowed a large transoceanic fiber-optic cable to land here, it also continues to keep this town on the cutting edge of technological advancement. It is that forward thinking of the elected officials that continues to make Hermosa such a great place to live. The nature of public office affords opportunities for progressive individuals such as yourselves to continue providing the quality of living Hermosa is synonymous for. A reputation of that nature draws the quality of individual we want to live and visit here. As one who has written his share of letters to multitudes of local and international leaders, I have found the common thread which weaves all those in such position together is the duty of being in service to the people. Though certain members of public office may at times stray from such responsibility, the nature of the office entrusted makes it easy to remind them of their duty. Wi-Fi Letter to Hermosa Brach City Council -11-05 Page I 47 Although it is the character of the individual the people believe in that is elected to public office, personal agenda has no place in such office when it conflicts with the interest of duty. In this we find confidence that personal opinion does not get in the way of beneficial public policy. Which leaves us with an objective consideration of the issue at hand. Looking upon the facts of the matter, it is understandable that this Council, as with all public officials, must weigh practical economic and logistical consideration while embracing future vision. Often that has meant a manner of compromise. But I wish to remind the Council that those practicalities are easily met given the proper mindset. In fact, it is those visionary leaders who see apparent problems as solutions from which legacy is made. Personally we have never been content with accepting what the current social condition advocates as a necessary compromise in the quality of life for the people. The nature of our 18 years of social research affords us this insight in which we can construct a remedy for any dilemma presently promoted by mainstream thinking as necessary. Therefore we do not come to you as someone who wishes to merely make a statement in support of free wireless internet access for the city of Hermosa Beach. We wish to present to you an opportunity that if accepted, will take Hermosa Beach to the next level. For we see Hermosa Beach as a world- class destination, and the internet is the vehicle to get us there. In order to embrace this possibility, we ask all members of the Council to see this opportunity not with the eyes of a pragmatic public official, but to lay those sensibilities aside to consider the greater vision for our fair city and beyond; The first thing to consider are the natural assets of our community. Some of those are; Amazing Natural Beach and Oceanfront Vista; set along one of the most pristine coastlines, Hermosa is one of the most sought-after destinations for beach -goers. The Strand; this amazing walkway is a stunning traverse across this gentle coastal hamlet, flanked by beautiful oceanfront residences on one side and clean extensive sand on the other. Multitudes of friendly people all enjoying themselves in this health -oriented community. Valuable Oceanfront Property; some of the most expensive and sought after real estate in California exists right here in Hermosa. Wi-Fi Letter to Hermosa Beach City Council 1-1 1-05 Page 2 of 7 Healthy Activities; A multitude of health -focussed events occur all year long. From recreational volleyball and championships to marathon and health runs, Hermosa is a healthy community. Active Nightlife; The Pier bustles with night-time activity on the weekends, gathered from miles around. Anyone looking for a parking spot near downtown can attest to this. Civic and Socially Beneficial Events; Many beneficial organizations focus their activities in this area, making for a very supportive community for those in need. Pleasant Shops and Stores; Shopping and dining in Hermosa is a pleasant experience, with a wide variety of products and services to choose from, geared towards the beach life-style. Clean Infrastructure; The city streets, storefronts and residences are well -kept in a safe and secure environment. Friendly Neighbors; The walls which separate property lines are indicative of the mentality in an area. Hermosa has low walls, making it easy to socialize with your neighbor. Upper -Income Bracket Residents; many of whom have mobile home offices. These forward - moving individuals represent a diverse and successful demographic of society, making for a higher quality of life. Festivals and Celebrations; Held throughout the year, these celebrations embrace the spirit of the community, while celebrating life in all its diversity. Incredible Local Talent; Many world-class talent perform in the local nightclubs and entertainment venues here in our community. That being said, we now present a vision as to how this can all be made better, using a properly designed municipal technology infrastructure. Wi-Fi Letter to Hermosa Beach City Council 1-11-05 Page 3 of7 HERMOSA BEACH IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM A PROPOSED VISION TO THE CITY COUNCIL USING TODAYS TECHNOLOGY AS A VEHICLE Hermosa City Government as a Gateway of Choice With the world only getting more and more technologically advanced, as a part of our everyday lives, the internet can make today's living quite easy if properly applied. Go down any chosen street in Hermosa with your wireless card on, and you will find a plethora of private wireless portals pouring into the streets. The citizens did not wait for the local government to provide them with internet access, it is already here, but they are paying additional unnecessary expense. Hermosa has a grand opportunity to create the standard allowing all these existing networks to easily combine and utilize a common architecture, capturing a great many extra participants in the process. And if they all use the Hermosa Beach portal, the advertising revenues will more than pay for itself while providing a profit. We see this as a perfect fit for those who have adopted the mobile -home -office lifestyle. Creative Financing Opportunities But that is not all. Multitudes of other methods exist to finance a municipal network. With a creative application of a combination of state and federal funding, advertising, and a strategic design of the commercial application of this network, consistent passive income exists, without being obtrusive. Those who want to be advertised to will seek out that advertising, while those who just want a pleasant internet experience will have the freedom to do so. By commissioning a Creative Financing Team, various funding sources can be creatively applied to generate more than enough revenue. Hermosa's Position is Guaranteed If we broaden our horizons to embrace this groundfloor opportunity, it is guaranteed to be beneficial for all, and quite financially lucrative. If Hermosa waits for other communities to take the lead in this matter, it shall lose its position. By working together, we can all make Hermosa a destination multitudes shall visit. The Laguna Journal, a local internet site, has been known to have 75,000 hits per day. Asking one of the participants why it has such traffic, they said it was because the world wanted to find out about Southern California. By utilizing such natural draws to the world as the image that Southern California, Hollywood and Los Angeles represent, and you have fabulous promotional opportunities. Wi-Fi Letter to Hermosa Beads City Council 1-1 I -05 Page 4 of 7 If the council decides to embrace this opportunity in its development stage, then it will help set the standard that other future municipal networks will gauge their own systems by. Such legacy will undoubtedly be a great boon to our local economy. Web Portal Design We propose to create an image for Hermosa that the world wants to come to. To create one of the world's best internet destinations with large traffic flows, a design contest would invite local and international web portal talent to create leading edge features to the Hermosa Beach portal, and the cost would be minimal, for many of them would do it for the exposure. Latest Leading Edge Technology With new technologies such as Macromedia's minimal -code Flash and Fireworks program, you can have exciting pull-down menus and graphics that stun, that even dial-up users can enjoy. Add ColdFusion, and you have access to back -end databases that provide extensive education and research applications for the users to access the world's information. A new search technology called Grokker organizes information by color, shape and custom application. Live Events To embody the spirit and character of Hermosa, there are many exciting applications available. This beautiful southern California location is a perfect pristine venue for live events, such as broadcast of live concerts by famous performers on the beach. Imagine Neil Young, Sting or Bonny Raitt giving a free live performance against the breathtaking backdrop of Hermosa's Strand and Beach. Make it a benefit concert for some cause they believe in, and they will show up. Local Opportunity, Global Exposure, Huge Advertising Revenue This not only allows local talent to be the cover bands for such shows, but it gives socially beneficial organizations a showcase otherwise unavailable for their services. As far as revenue generation for the local government, do you think Coke or Banana Republic would hesitate to pay high dollar for high traffic exposure, especially when they can be tied in with the cause, giving them an impeccable public image? A 60 -day cancellation policy is perfect for drawing advetisers in. But once here, who would want to leave? Once the local public's best and brightest are invited in a design contest to Wi-Fi Letter to Hermosa Beach Ciry Council 1-1 1-05 Page 5 of 7 "put Hermosa on the map of internet destination sites", you will undoubtedly have one of the greatest portals with the latest technology, with high traffic volume. Live Broadcast of Civic Events and Festivals Another aspect important to this puzzle is live broadcast of festivals, contests and events, such as marathons, bike events and surfing contests, and you have a place visitors can come to time and time again. Add live webcams, and people will tune in just to check the weather, or see how busy the Pier is on a weekend night. Live Local Government/Public Interactive Broadcast We also propose a live -link to local government meetings and events which affect the public, both on public tv and the internet, whose interests are truly in the center of discussion. Add live polling and call-in to this, and local government officials can get real-time information regarding important issues, and the opinions of their local constituency, which assures they perform in a manner which the people prefer. There is no better way to secure your position as a public official but to perform as the people want you to. Proposal to the Federal Government This also leads us to our recommendation regarding broader government opportunity. Considering the fact that Hermosa Beach is one of the first municipalities which could implement a city-wide network service to its residents, there is a grand opportunity to call this to the attention of the United States Congress. We as Social Design Consultants could facilitate the drafting of The Municipal Networks Act Bill to place on the House Floor to make it easier to secure a mixture of both federal and state funds for performing this public service. Proposal to the Internet Protocols Standard Another consideration is that, as far as networks go, to have a local government implement a free network for its city, we can also draft a proposal to ICANN, the internet protocols society, to consider Hermosa Beach a testbed for municiple network prototyping. Imagine having government funding to build the foundation networks, designed by the architects of the internet. Wi-Fi Letter to Hermosa Beach City Council 1-1 1-05 Page 6 of 7 Addressing the Security Issues Security issues are not a problem anymore. Previous wireless technology prevented so many corporations from trusting secure commercial transactions, for they could be compromised. Such concerns have now been mitigated with a new technology in which a VPN (Virtual Private Network) is wrapped in an encrypted pipe, and each packet is also wrapped in an encrypted envelope. This double -layer security makes it almost impossible (and definitely not feasible) for intruders to access. With so much going on, and advertisers placing their products and services online in our portal of choice, in this ever-increasing valuable site there will be substantial commercial activity. Future Growth in Hermosa Beach As Hermosa becomes more and more popular with the online community, and there is an increase in physical visitors here, we see the making of a few larger Design and Internet Cafes, which allow designers a place to do their work, people to cruise the internet, and a Gaming Center which will give the local youth a place to gather. Combine this with the aforementioned applications of this technology now available, and you have a running success for all. Our Proposal to the Council In conclusion, as we have presented much to the City Council today, we realize it will take more research into the viability of making this a reality. As Social Design Consultants, we specialize in such research. If the Council would like to get more information, we can do a Feasibility Study for the Council, and submit a budget to you for approval. In our opinion, Hermosa Beach literally has the potential to become the internet destination of beach communities. But as Plato once said, "To begin is the most important part of any quest, and by far, the most courageous". Now is that time, for the opportunity is now at hand. By taking that brave first step, this Council can leave a legacy to be proud of for all future generations. Thank you. SiQcerely; Patrick McCormick Social Design Consultant Wi-Fi Letter to Hermosa Beach City Council 1-11-05 Page 7 of 7 Message Page 1 of 3 Steve Burrell From: Eric Black [eric@LAunplugged.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 2:58 PM To: Steve Burrell Subject: FW: WiFi Hermosa - consider this before voting Importance: High Steve, Here's my response to your questions. -Eric 1. Adequate coverage. I was once a member of a radio architecture team that designed WiFi (802.11 a/b/g) and Bluetooth radios. WiFi (802.11 a/b/g) was never designed to operate at 150 to 300 feet, it was designed to operate over many miles. In fact, last summer a wifi-shoot out contest was held in which the winning team demonstrated a reliable WiFi (802.11 b/g) link at 55.1 miles (www.wifi-shootout.com). Line -of -sight is not an access requirement. If it were, then users would not be able to access WiFiHermosa in City Hall, the City Library, or on the Community Center lawn. All of which are obstructed: the first two by the roofs of the buildings; the last by the trees of the green belt. Mr. Davis fails to mention that there are two categories of WiFi access points: consumer and enterprise. Consumer access points have ranges around a 100 feet only because at that range their price points are affordable to the average consumer. Enterprise access points like those used in WiFiHermosa easily have a range of a few thousand feet. Currently Hermosa has 6 enterprise access points. After the build -out there will be 36 enterprise access points. Without an external antenna for example coverage around the firetower is 700 to 1200 feet. With an external antenna it is considerably further. Most areas of the city will be very well covered once the build -out has been completed. With simple indoor external antennas (available for $50 to $100 at local electronics stores) coverage will be nearly ubiquitous. 2. Interference issues. WiFiHermosa places its backhaul in the 5 GHz spectrum. Because its coverage is in a separate spectrum at 2.4 GHz, performance in terms of throughput, delay, and interference is greatly improved. Mr. Davis fails to mention that WiFiHermosa uses 802.11a (5 GHz) radios in addition to 802.11g radios. 3. Revenue. This has been handled directly by the city and not LA Unplugged. 4. Other Technologies. An important consideration in LA Unplugged's recommendation of Strix Systems is that their mesh networking hardware is highly modular. In their poduct line, radios come in modules that can be easily replaced. LA Unplugged has made sure that this can be done without the need to move or replace exisiting cables, enclosures, or antennas. The WiFi-plus WISPER antennas recommended actually work at several bands including 2.4 and 5 GHz. The upgradability afforded by Strix's modularity is now impossible to achieve with mesh networking hardware from any other manufacturer. Nor does any other manufacturer offer the range of radios that Strix does. Right now Strix Systems makes radio modules for all current standards (802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11a, and Bluetooth) and is committed to making additional radios modules for any new standard that comes on the market including WiMax. Eric C. Black President LA Unplugged, Inc. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Cell: 310-600-0699 Fax: 310-388-3239 1/11/2005 SUPPLEMENTAL. itiFOB }QTc 0,1,1 6b Message Page 2 of 3 Original Message From: Mark Davis [mailto:mdavis@commspeed.net] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 9:03 AM To: peter@electpetertucker.com; samedgerton@aol.com; artyoon@hotmail.com; jbrhbcc@aol.com; michael@manhattanbread.com; sburrell@hermosabch.org Subject: WiFi Hermosa - consider this before voting Importance: High TO: Hermosa Beach City Council Members Date: January 10, 2004 As a former resident of Hermosa Beach and an operator of one of the largest broadband wireless services in the nation, I have been following your wireless deployment test with great interest. On January 11 you will be considering City Manager Steve Burrell's recommendation of January 5 to spend $126,496 for a "full deployment." I strongly recommend that you consider the following factors, and vote NO. 1. Inadequate coverage. There is no detail in Mr. Burrell's report as to the number of access points that would be installed for the full deployment. I know from experience that $126K will be woefully inadequate to provide indoor service within your city limits of 1.3 square miles. Here's why — WiFi (802.11b and 802.11g) is a technology designed to operate within a range of 150 to 300 feet. Read the comments by your residents, posted at www.wifihermosabeach.com/support to see that the current two access points are useable only when one is within a very short distance, AND has clear line of sight. Note the degree of frustration by potential users who cannot get service within a block or two of your existing access points. Providing indoor coverage for 1.3 miles would require 130 to 260 access points, perhaps more. How many access points have been budgeted by Mr. Burrell? Note the comment below written by All -City Computers, who has been working to support the test. Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2004 4:11 pm Post subject: Where are we? Where are they? All- City.Computers "Ordinary notebook Antennas and PDA's must be very close ... additional equipment, in my opinion, namely external antennas indoors or outdoors, are required for a good signal, outside of a very limited radius around the existing nodes." So, is it possible to for your residents to get service further from access points by mounting an external antenna? To answer this question, I can rely on five years of experience in deploying similar networks here in Northern Arizona. The answer is a very qualified "maybe." The qualification is this — "only with an absolutely clear line -of - sight." Here in Arizona we have very few trees which block line -of -sight and are therefore able to service some customers by installing outdoor antennas. Having lived in Hermosa, I know there are neighborhoods with very heavy tree coverage. Has Mr. Burrell provided an estimate of the number of households that would be unable to receive service, even with an outdoor antenna? I suspect that you will end up spending $126K to service a very select few locations. 2. Interference issues. The proposed expanded network would operate using unlicensed spectrum in the 1/11/2005 Message Page 3 of 3 2.4GHz band. These frequencies are subject to interference from the hundreds of home wireless networks your residents are currently using. Interference is also caused by microwave ovens, portable wireless phones, and other devices. My company had to stop deploying 2.4GHz networks due to these interference issues. It is simply not reliable. Here, too, you can refer to www.wifihermosabeach.com/support to see that interference issues have been plaguing the test in Hermosa Beach, frustrating your residents because of intermittent service. 3. Flawed Revenue Model. Mr. Burrell should be applauded in his attempt to build a budget that would make the network self-supporting via advertising revenue. You should question the long term viability of this revenue stream. How many advertisers would continue to support a service that reaches a limited number of residents and businesses and is available only intermittently. 4. Impending disruptive technologies. You should visit www.wimaxforum.orq. This is an organization led by Intel and over 100 wireless equipment manufacturers. They are developing new technologies which will solve some of the range and interference issues described above. Standards are being developed which will be released in 2005 and 2006. The new standard, called 802.11 e. The WiFi (802.11 b and 802.11 g) equipment you are being asked to buy will not be compatible with WiMax. Are you prepared to make a substantial investment in equipment that provides inadequate coverage, provides intermittent service due to interference, will soon become antiquated? Please consider these issues, and vote accordingly. Mark Davis mdavis@commspeed.net Vice President & General Manager CommSpeed www.commspeed.net 7411 E. Addis Ave. Prescott Valley, AZ 86314 928-772-1111 x105 Fax 775-2809 1/11/2005 WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 101 E. Wilson Street, 9th Floor P.O. Box 7869 Madison, WI 53702-7869 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) For CITYWIDE WIFI ACCESS And DESIGN, INSTALL, OPERATE, MANAGE, MAINTAIN AND MARKET A COMMON WIRELESS ACCESS SYSTEM (CWAS) for DANE COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT RFP #041210-det PROPOSALS ARE TO BE MAILED OR HAND -DELIVERED DIRECTLY TO: WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION ATTN: ELIZABETH SNIDER 101 EAST WILSON STREET, 9TH FLOOR POST OFFICE BOX 7869 MADISON, WISCONSIN 53702-7869 608.264.7895 (office) PROPOSALS RECEIVED AFTER 2:00 PM CENTRAL TIME ON JANUARY 10, 2005 WILL NOT BE EVALUATED. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Purpose of the Request for Proposals (RFP) 1 Questions about the RFP 1 Pre -Proposal Vendor Conference 1 Timeline 1 1. VISION 2 1.1 Coverage 2 1.2 Nature of Service- Government, Business, Home, Visitor 2 1.2.1 Government 2 1.2.2 Business 2 - 1.2.3 Home 2 1.2.4 Visitor 2 1.2.5 Splash Page/Walled Garden 3 2. SCOPE OF WORK 3 2.1 Strategic Partnership 3 2.2 Duration of Partnership 3 2.3 Assets 3 2.4 Needs 3 2.4.1 General System Needs 4 2.4.2 Subscriber Access Devices and Equipment Options 4 2.4.3 Billing and Charge Back 4 2.4.4 Coverage and Towers 4 2.4.5 Operation, Maintenance, and System Evolution 4 3 PROPOSAL PROCESS 5 3.1 Statement of Need 5 3.2 Process 5 3.2.1 Proposal Format 5 3.2.2 Oral Presentation 5 3.3 Proposal Content 5 3.3.1 Cover Page 5 3.3.2 Letter of Transmittal 5 3.3.3 Table of Contents 6 3.3.4 Description of the Vendor's Firm / Company 6 3.3.5 Proposal Components — General 6 3.3.6 General System Needs 6 3.3.7 Subscriber Access Devices and Equipment Options 7 3.3.8 Billing and Charge Back 7 3.3.9 Coverage and Towers 7 3.3.10 Operation, Maintenance, and System Evolution 7 3.3.11 Contract Terms 7 4 EVALUATION CRITERIA 7 4.1 Award Criteria 8 4.2 Contract Award and Development 8 4.3 Multiple Awards 8 4.4 Proposal Content part of Contract 8 4.5 Performance Guarantee 8 EVALUATION CRITERIA 9 AMENDMENTS TO THE RFP 9 CONSTRAINTS 9 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL 10 APPENDIX A 12 AIRPORT SECTION 12 Introduction Travelers and businesses increasingly have come to expect and depend upon reliable and sustained wireless connectivity that is relatively free of interference. Wireless applications in the public environment are on the rise. The State of Wisconsin, the City of Madison, Dane County and the Dane County Regional Airport recognize that public wireless systems will evolve more in the future and have joined together in a substantial effort to provide wireless access to complement existing cellular services in areas of limited physical scope. Purpose of the Request for Proposals (RFP) The purpose of this RFP is to solicit for citywide Wi-Fi access as well as design, install, operate, manage, maintain and market a common wireless access system (CWAS) for the Dane County Regional Airport. In addition to establishing a wireless network the State requires responding vendors to explicitly address the ability to provide high levels of availability, flexibility and customer responsiveness. The successful vendor must be able to adjust to an ever-changing business environment. It is important that we have the flexibility to take full advantage of new technologies as they evolve without financial or technical penalties. As an integral part of this proposal, each of the entities above will execute documents covering their unique sites with the successful vendor. Questions about the RFP Written questions about the RFP will be accepted until 3:00 PM Central Time on Tuesday, December 14, 2004. Please email questions to: Elizabeth.Sniderdoa.state.wi.us or fax to Elizabeth Snider at (608) 264-9500 by 3:00 PM Central Time, Tuesday, December 14, 2004. Pre -Proposal Vendor Conference A pre -proposal vendor conference will be held on Wednesday, December 15, 2004 at 10:00 AM Central Time. The conference will be held in the Robert B. Skuldt Conference Room of the Dane County Regional Airport Terminal Building, 4000 International Lane, Madison, Wisconsin. The purpose is to discuss the requirements and objectives of this RFP. Airport representatives, State, County and City staff will be available to answer questions. During the conference, State, County, City and Airport representatives will attempt to answer all questions submitted prior to and during the conference. A summary of the questions and answers, as well as a list of all attendees, will be made available in the form of an amendment to this RFP and forwarded to all individuals or companies that received a copy of the RFP. Potential proposers may wish to conduct a physical tour of the Airport. Tours of the Airport facility will be conducted immediately following the vendor conference. That will be the only time available for touring the Airport facility. Timeline Estimated Timetable of Events Milestone Date Issue RFP December 10, 2004 Submission of written questions by Proposers Due December 14, 2004 Pre -proposal conference December 15, 2004 State Response to Proposers' Questions — RFP Addenda December 17, 2004 Proposals due January 10,2005 Vendor interviews complete January 20, 2005 Notice of Intent January 24, 2005 1 • Timing and sequence of events resulting from this RFP shall ultimately be determined by the State in collaboration with the affected stakeholders. 1. VISION The City of Madison, the County of Dane, and the State of Wisconsin are interested in procuring a seamless wireless network that would be available to residents, businesses, and travelers to the Madison area and later to other parts of Dane County and Wisconsin. The goal of this project is a single constant Internet experience throughout the city, and eventually the rest of Dane County and other communities in the State of Wisconsin that will facilitate the use of a wireless network and minimize redundancy, expense, and inconsistency of coverage. 1.1 Coverage ------ -- --------The network should completely cover at a minimum a 1.5 mile radius from the State Capitol, with-arr emphasis on the Capitol Square, State and Local Govemment Offices, and State Street. Coverage will include the interior of buildings. A Zink to the Airport must be included, with provisions for adding a hot spot at the Monona Terrace and the Alliant Energy Center either initially, or within a year to allow for unique concerns at each facility to be worked out. Within the duration of the contract, these facilities will be included in the network. In addition, we require a plan for completely covering the city of Madison within the timeframe of the contract so that the city can plan to migrate municipal applications to the network. We encourage proposals to include a geographic coverage area greater than the minimum described in the RFP. 1.2 Nature of Service- Government, Business, Home, Visitor The network must be able to accommodate the different needs of the potential users within the coverage area. 1.2.1 Government Wireless capability must be available in all govemment buildings within the initial coverage area and must be planned for the entire city of Madison. Use of the network for mobile emergency response and public health purposes must be a priority and be provided at minimal or no cost. Public spaces, such as city parks and the Capitol grounds within the coverage area must be accessible. Governments, such as Dane County or the City of Madison, must have the option of paying for the usage of discreet coverage areas, making that area free to the end user. An example would be an economically disadvantaged neighborhood, allowing the municipality to help bridge the digital divide. 1.2.1.1 Airport Attachment A contains the specific requirements for the Airport. For the response to be accepted, all of the requirements for the Airport must be met. 1.2.2 Business Bandwidth and service levels must be sufficient to encourage business within the coverage area to use the network for daily work purposes. a) Develop and propose bulk usage rates for businesses that would extensively use the network (this provision includes the airport). 1.2.3 Home The network must be accessible to home users within the coverage area. a) Provide a rate structure for home users at different bulk increments including monthly and annual discount rates. 1.2.4 Visitor A major objective of the network should be the convenience of the visitor to Madison. The business traveler, for example, should be able to rely on one network to the greatest extent possible while visiting Dane County. In addition, the resources that the visitor may need while in this community should also be presented and made available to them on the network. a) Present the network from the perspective of the visitor to Dane County, including heavily used travel destinations. 1.2.5 Splash Page/Wailed Garden The customer should be able to access the system from a Splash page that has features on it that are available for free to all citizens within the coverage area (walled garden). At a minimum those free Internet sites should include all local and state govemment web sites and critical visitor information. a) Please propose, in detail, what elements on the site will be made available to public free of charge and how the site will be designed including advertising revenue. Consideration should be given to partnering with the Greater Madison Visitor and Convention Bureau and the Greater Madison Chamber of Commerce_.. b) Describe the billing process for those areas of the network that are/would be fee for service. 2. SCOPE OF WORK 2.1 Strategic Partnership This project is to establish a long and enduring relationship with one or more telecommunications provider(s) that is/are willing to become a stakeholder in Wisconsin and assist in improving the State's communications infrastructure. We believe there is a strong need for one or more companies to enter into a public-private partnership with govemmental entities in the State of Wisconsin. We seek to establish a win-win partnership where the citizens of the State are offered better services and the provider(s) experience a prosperous business environment that fosters continued technological telecommunications advancements. 2.2 Duration of Partnership Specifically, the State of Wisconsin seeks to enter into agreement for a term of 3 years with two one year renewal options, under which one or more prospective strategic partners will provide services as set forth in a contract agreement. 2.3 Assets The State, County and City will allow access to their infrastructure for the installation of equipment and towers to maximize the coverage of the network. a) The proposal should detail what infrastructure would be used and in what manner. The vendor will be responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of their equipment on municipal property. b) The proposal should detail what City infrastructure the Proposing vendor would like to use and in what way; and also supply diagrams and specifications of any devices to be placed on City infrastructure. c) Describe the maintenance required on devices attached to City infrastructure and how that maintenance will be performed. Vendor will be responsible for removing their devices from City Tight poles when City chooses to replace the pole and also replacing the devices on the new light poles. 2.4 Needs Listed below are the various needs we have identified for the State, County and City. Services should be designed to serve indoor and outdoor clients. 2.4.1 General System Needs a) Wireless Internet access services b) Dynamic and static IP addressing c) Classes of service suitable for business, residential, public safety and special projects d) Availability of always on, always connected, VLANs (or acceptable alternatives) that can be dedicated to specific applications (i.e., one VLAN per major application) e) Availability of prioritized quality of service by VLAN (or acceptable alternatives) for types of traffic flows (i.e., voice, data, video) f) Support IP mobility for vehicles moving at traffic speeds as they pass through the coverage areas, or cells, so that connections are maintained. The system shall be capable of delivering wireless voice, data, and video communications services to patrons and visitors as they occupy or roam through defined authorized access areas state, city and county facilities. g)__local .peering connection for local survivability of communications and to minimize -data transit time. The local point -of -presence should have the intelligence to route local data locally. In the event the Internet backbone fails, we should still be able to communicate locally. h) Provide data backbone capabilities between designated locations. i) Quality of Service suitable for voice, data, and video applications — explain system latency, jitter, bandwidth and other QoS parameters provided to support multiple users and applications. 2.4.2 Subscriber Access Devices and Equipment Options a) Inside wireless access device with choice of inside and outside antennas b) Equipment for portable applications is desired 2.4.3 Billing and Charge Back a) Billing procedures and capabilities, including separate invoicing for the State, County and City. b) Proposed rate structure for private end users. Including daily, monthly and annual rates. Including corporate bulk usage rates. c) Revenue sharing plan for the State, County and City including Dane County Regional Airport, Monona Terrace and Alliant Energy Center. 2.4.4 Coverage and Towers a) Phase la should be near 100% coverage for the Dane County Regional Airport. b) Phase lb should be near 100% coverage of a mile and a half radius around the State Capitol building and the Alliant Energy Center. c) Second phase is to provide service to all of the Madison Area. d) The proposed system spectrum, capacity, penetration, and interference issues need to be managed - explain the proposed solution details. 2.4.5 Operation, Maintenance, and System Evolution a) Provide system performance measurement, monitoring, repair, and maintenance on a 24/7 basis, or as negotiated b) Maintain good performance levels, or as negotiated c) Provide network survivability if a tower, or site, is lost d) Provide equipment that can be remotely updated, configured, and maintained with a minimum of service disruption e) Plan for upgrading infrastructure, capacities, and services as technologies advance so that they do not become obsolete, or are no longer competitive, while minimizing and controlling costs .f) Marketing Plan describing the promotion of available services and future expansion. 4 3 PROPOSAL PROCESS 3.1 Statement of Need The State invites interested telecommunications providers ("Vendors") to submit proposals describing how they can meet the State's goals for ensuring that the community benefits from new and advanced information technologies, how a creative partnership can be used in that effort, and how they can meet the goals articulated in the previous section. 3.2 Process 3.2.1 Proposal Format Vendors should follow the format set forth herein and provide all of the information requested. Proposals that do not adhere to these formatting requirements may be considered non- responsive. Proposals should be submitted in a sealed envelope with the name of the vendor and the relevant RFP name and number on the front. Responses must be submitted with one original and two copies. All proposals submitted will become the property of the State and will not be retumed. Proposals must remain open and valid for six months from the opening date, unless the time for awarding the contract is extended by mutual consent of State and the vendor. 3.2.2 Oral Presentation The Vendors may be required to give an oral presentation of its proposal to the State/City/County evaluation committee. This will provide an opportunity for the Vendor to clarify or elaborate on the proposal. The Team will schedule the time and location of such presentations. Presentations are at the option of the Team and may not be conducted. Therefore, proposals should be complete. 3.3 Proposal Content 3.3.1 Cover Page This must include the RFP number, title and the complete vendor name and mailing address 3.3.2 Letter of Transmittal Proposals must include the name and telephone number of the person the State should contact regarding the proposal. Proposals must confirm that the organization will comply with all the provisions of this RFP, and include a statement describing any potential conflict of interest. Any exceptions to the State contract's general terms and conditions should be discussed in the statement. The vendor must provide a brief description of the organization including history; number of years the organization has been in business; type of services provided; legal status of vendor organization, i.e. corporation, partnership, sole proprietor; Federal employer ID number. The vendor must submit a copy of its most recent audited or compiled financial statements, with the name, address and telephone number of a contact in the company's principal financing or banking organization. The financial statements must have been completed by a Certified Public Accountant. A vendor representative authorized to make contractual obligations must sign the cover letter. 5 3.3.3 Table of Contents Provide sufficient detail so reviewers can locate all the important elements of the document readily. Identify each section of the response as outlined in the proposal package. NOTE: YOUR RESPONSE SHOULD CLEARLY ADDRESS HOW YOU PROPOSE TO MEET OR EXCEED THE FOLLOWING 3.3.4 - 3.3.10 3.3.4 Description of the Vendor's Firm 1 Company The description should include the following elements: a) Type of entity b) Where headquartered c) History d) Principals e) f) 9) h) i) Financial strength (include a complete copy of Proposer's audited financial statements prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Practices, for the two (2) most recent fiscal years, showing complete operations and a statement of any significant financial events occurring subsequent to the closing date of the most recent financial statement. The financial statements shall be audited statements certified by an independent Certified Public Accountant (CPA). If audited financial statements are not available, reviews or compilations by an independent CPA shall be submitted. Technical qualifications and expertise to meet the State's telecommunications needs (include copies of relevant federal and state licenses and certificates) Personnel who would be assigned to work on the Project with resumes and relevant work experience Related experience Team Relationships - If Vendor is a team of more than one entity, provide a detailed description of the relationship between and responsibilities of the entities. 3.3.5 Proposal Components — General a) The terms upon which the Vendor desires to use the State, County, City's existing infrastructure b) The nature and structure of the "partnership" being proposed c) The financial and other benefits to the State, County, City including reduced costs, new revenue opportunities, economic development, and enhanced service capabilities d) A description of the ways in which the Vendor would assist the State, County, City to accomplish its telecommunications goals and vision A discussion of the proposal's compliance with all relevant legal requirements Proposal to offer data, voice, and Internet services to the State and other public entities e) f) 3.3.6 General System Needs a) b) c) d) e) f) 9) h) Wireless Internet access services Dynamic and static IP addressing Classes of service suitable for business, residential, public safety and special projects Availability of always on, always connected, VLANs (or acceptable altematives) that can be dedicated to specific applications (i.e., one VLAN per major application) Availability of prioritized quality of service by VLAN (or acceptable alternatives) for types of traffic flows (i.e., voice, data, video) Support IP mobility for vehicles moving at traffic speeds as they pass through the coverage areas, or cells, so that connections are maintained A local peering connection for local survivability of communications and to minimize data transit time. The local point -of -presence should have the intelligence to route local data locally. In the event the Internet backbone fails, we should still be able to communicate locally. Provide data backbone capabilities between designated locations 6 i) Quality of Service suitable for voice, data, and video applications --explain system latency, jitter, bandwidth and other QoS parameters provided to support multiple users and applications j) Support user access to all available licensed and unlicensed wireless services operating in duly authorized and allocated frequency bands in a neutral, non-discriminatory manner k) Include all hardware and software needed to operate in accordance with contract requirements, such as the uplink or downlink RF, power systems, power backup, antennas, base stations, towers, multiplexers, personal computers, cable/fiber and associated systems 3.3.7 Subscriber Access Devices and Equipment Options a) Inside wireless access device with choice of inside and outside antennas b) Equipment for portable applications is desired 3.3.8 Billing and Charge Back a) Billing procedures and capabilities, including separate invoicing for the State, County and City. b) Proposed rate structure for private end users. Including daily, monthly and annual rates. Including corporate bulk usage rates. c) Revenue sharing plan for State, County and City including Dane County Regional Airport, Monona Terrace and Alliant Energy Center. 3.3.9 Coverage and Towers a) Phase la should be near 100% coverage for the Dane County Regional Airport. b) Phase 1b should be near 100% coverage of a mile and a half radius around the State Capitol building and the Alliant Energy Center. c) Second phase is to provide service to all of the Madison Area d) The proposed system spectrum, capacity, penetration, and interference issues need to be managed - explain the proposed solution details 3.3.10 Operation, Maintenance, and System Evolution a) Provide system performance measurement, monitoring, repair, and maintenance on a 24/7 basis, or as negotiated b) Maintain good performance levels, or as negotiated c) Provide network survivability if a tower, or site, is lost d) Provide equipment that can be remotely updated, configured, and maintained with a minimum of service disruption e) Plan for upgrading infrastructure, capacities, and services as technologies advance so that they do not become obsolete, or are no longer competitive, while minimizing and controlling costs f) Marketing Plan describing the promotion of available services and future expansion. 3.3.11 Contract Terms a) Negotiated service periods, with renewals b) Meet service availability and installation timelines c) Provide service at designated locations that are within the coverage areas previously described under "Coverage and Towers' d) Provide affordable solutions for residents and businesses that are competitively priced with DSL and Cable 4 EVALUATION CRITERIA The State may choose to enter into negotiations with more than one Vendor in any specific area or to issue a follow up RFP to a short list of Vendors. 7 4.1 Award Criteria The State will evaluate proposals in accordance with the following criteria. a) Able to facilitate to the State the goals stated in section 2 of this RFP b) Able to deliver the Walled Garden stated in section 1 of this RFP c) Ability to meet the State's current and future telecommunications needs d) Prior experience in providing telecommunications services e) Technical and management experience of personnel f) Range, quality, and timeliness of telecommunications services offered g) Cost of service to the State and reasonableness of price proposed for services h) Responsiveness to the RFP i) Special qualifications j) Suitability of services for the State's purposes k) Customer service practices I) Previous projects, descriptions, and references m) Operations and maintenance of facilities n) Long-term viability of the "partnering" arrangement and its value to the State o) Level of service to be provided to the community p) Compensation to be provided to the State in exchange for the use of State assets, including increased revenue to the State, services, cash, or other valuable consideration 4.2 Contract Award and Development The competitive negotiation method of selection, as described by the State of Wisconsin Procurement Code will be used to determine the most qualified Vendor among those submitting proposals. Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the proposal evaluation criteria in this RFP. The State is eager to move forward quickly and will, therefore, complete the proposal -evaluation and contract award - and -development processes as rapidly as possible. At the time the Agreement is executed, the successful vendor is required to submit performance guarantee in the amount of $10,000 in the form of a Certified Check, Cashier's Check, or Money Order made payable without condition to the Wisconsin Department of Administration. 4.3 Multiple Awards The State is willing to negotiate with more than one Vendor to satisfy the various aspects of the State's request. Vendors may submit joint proposals. The State may, during the course of evaluating the proposals, suggest that one or more Vendors cooperate and form alliances to satisfy the State's requests. 4.4 Proposal Content part of Contract The content of the RFP and the successful Vendor(s)' proposal will become an integral part of the contract, but may be modified by provisions of the contract. Vendors must be amenable to inclusion in a contract of any information provided either in response to this RFP or received subsequently during the selection process. The information received will be considered contractual in nature and will be used in evaluation of proposals and in subsequent contractual action. 4.5 Performance Guarantee At the time the Agreement is executed, the successful vendor is required to submit performance guarantee in the amount of $10,000 in the form of a Certified Check, Cashier's Check, or Money Order made payable without condition to the Wisconsin Department of Administration. 8 EVALUATION CRITERIA Proposals will be evaluated on the following criteria. A. Technical Design and Implementation The clarity, quality and completeness of Proposer's proposal with respect to the Technical Design and Implementation requirements stipulated in Section 2. B. Management and Operations Plan The quality, clarity and completeness of Proposer's proposal with respect to the Management and Operations Plan as cited in Section 2. C. Experience and Qualifications of Key Personnel Quality and quantity of experience of the Proposer and its key personnel as required by Section 2. D. Financial Offer and Financial Ability to Perform The percentage of Gross Receipts proposed to be paid to the Airport, the reasonableness of the Pro Forma with full supporting details, and reasonableness of the proposed pricing to wireless providers as required in Section 2. E. Timelines Particular initiatives that will provide the most efficient installation and implementation in the environments identified in this RFP. 30% 25% 15% 15% 15% TOTAL: 100% AMENDMENTS TO THE RFP Any pertinent information relative to this RFP developed on or after December 10, 2004 and that is subsequent to issuance and prior to the established date for the receipt of the Proposals will be issued to all prospective Proposers on record in the form of a written amendment. Failure to acknowledge receipt of an amendment may result in the rejection of the Proposal. CONSTRAINTS The State will require the successful vendor to complete the Airport CWAS installation and implementation and the citywide Wi-Fi access within 90 consecutive calendar days from executing an Agreement. The 90 -day consecutive calendar days will begin within three (3) business days of the fully executed agreement. Failure to meet the completion date provides a basis for invoking the Performance Guarantee. A share of the Proposer's Gross Receipts will be paid to the State, Airport City, County in exchange for the privileges granted under Agreement. The State shall have the right to reject any or all proposals and to reject a proposal not accompanied by any required data, or to reject a proposal, which is in any way incomplete or irregular. The State shall reject all proposals from vendors where there is evidence of collusion among the vendors. 9 In the event there are inconsistencies between the general conditions and other terms or conditions contained herein, the former will take precedence. The State's terms and conditions of contract, including the Hardware Rider, apply to the Airport and other "non -state" agencies. The State shall have the right to waive any informality or irregularity in any proposal received and to advertise for new proposals where the acceptance, rejection, waiving, or re -advertising is determined by the State to be in its own best interest. No oral conversations or agreements with any official, agent, or employee of the State, City, County or Airport shall affect or modify any terms of this RFP. Any alleged oral agreement or arrangement made by a potential vendor with any department, agency, official or employee of the State, City, County or Airport shall be superseded by the Contract that results from this RFP process. Oral communications to a potential vendor shall not be binding on the State, nor shall any written materials provided by any person other than the State's official contact in this process. In the event of a contract award, all sales, supporting material and other documentation submitted to this process becomes property of the State. If this process does not result in an award, all sales, supporting material and other document will be destroyed, unless the vendor requests they be returned. Any work product, whether acceptable or unacceptable, developed under a contract with the State is to be the sole property of the State unless stated otherwise. The State will monitor all terms and conditions carefully and throughout the relationship with the selected vendor may make amendments to the contract, in concert with the vendor, for reasons including but not limited to improving communications, ensuring opportunities to address pricing based on market conditions and calibrating service performance. The successful vendor shall comply with all employment laws and regulations regarding safety. The successful vendor shall ensure all staff is properly trained in safe work practices and procedures. The State requires the successful vendor's agreement that the contract resulting from this RFP can become available to other municipalities in the State of Wisconsin that want to sign on to the project in the future. This will be through a piggyback arrangement subject to approval by the State Department of Administration. Submission of a Proposal shall constitute a valid offer that may be accepted for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days following the date specified for submission of Proposals. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS A. Proposal An original hardcopy (marked as such and including signature pages) plus eight (8) CD-ROMs or 3.5" diskettes of the Proposal must be submitted in a manner that conforms to detail specified in this RFP. Please clearly mark and submit the portion related to fees on a separate sheet and on separate CD-ROM or 3.5" diskette. The original hardcopy proposal must contain appropriate signatures by an authorized official of the Proposer's company. Enclosed the Proposal in a sealed envelope or package, and mail or hand deliver to the name and address on the cover page of this RFP. All Proposals must be received no later than 2:00 pm on January 10, 2005 to be eligible for consideration. Proposals or modifications received subsequent to the noted date and time shall be considered late Proposals" and will not be evaluated. 10 B. Proprietary Data It is incumbent upon the Proposer to indicate clearly what portions of the Proposal, if any, contain proprietary information that the Proposer would not wish to disclose to persons outside the Airport. The Airport will consider all Proposals to be confidential in nature during the solicitation process, but those portions of the selected Proposer's Proposal which are not marked proprietary and that are incorporated into the Agreement, shall become public information when the Agreement is executed with the selected Proposer. Proposals shall not be returned to the Proposers. C. Deviations from Requirements All Proposers are advised that significant deviations from this RFP may result in reduced evaluation scores. "Significant deviations" are terms inconsistent with or substantially varied from the financial and operational terms set forth in this RFP. Further, the Airport reserves the right to reject any Proposal that does not provide the information requested in the RFP. D. Proposal Format 1. Each proposal will be typewritten, using a 12 -point font, on a standard 8 1/2" X 11" page format, in a three-ring binder and accompanied by a cover letter on the Proposer's letterhead. The pages must be numbered and a Table of Contents should be provided. The body of the Proposal shall be no more than 50 one-sided pages in length, double-spaced, and shall provide all information requested herein. Proposers must organize their Proposals so that they address each of the elements stated herein in the same order as listed. 2. The Proposal shall include the following mandatory exhibits for the Airport and all other locations as applicable, which shall not be included in the 50 -page limit: a) System Design; b) Preliminary Description of Equipment; c) Preliminary Equipment Space Site Plan; d) Preliminary Head -end Space Site Plan; e) Preliminary Wireless Access Point Locations; f) Test Plan. 3. Additional optional data and exhibits may be included under separate cover if the Proposer deems them important to the presentation. 4. If the Proposal does not comply with these conditions, it may be considered non-responsive by the Evaluation Committee and may be rejected without further consideration. These constraints are intended to provide uniformity in Proposers response formats. 11 APPENDIX A AIRPORT SECTION DESIGN, INSTALL, OPERATE, MANAGE, MAINTAIN AND MARKET A COMMON WIRELESS ACCESS SYSTEM (CWAS) AT DANE COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT IN MADISON, WI SECTION I - PURPOSE A. This section (Airport Section) requires a point -by -point response from interested and qualified vendors to design, install, operate, manage, maintain and market a Common Wireless Access System (CWAS) at the Dane County Regional Airport (the Airport). It is imperative that a point - by -point response be provided. Proposals that do not contain a point -by -point response to the Airport Section will be considered incomplete. B. The primary purpose of the CWAS is to offer providers of wireless communications services with a means of extending their services to customers located at the Airport. The Airport is served by multiple cellular and PCS carriers, and other public and private wireless services also exist or are coming soon. These services include wireless fidelity, or "Wi-Fi", and other unlicensed services. Travelers and businesses at the Airport increasingly depend upon, and have come to expect, reliable and sustained connections relatively free of interference. Rather than trying to find space for new sites and new equipment for each of these providers, the Airport believes that allowing providers nondiscriminatory access to shared infrastructure, in the form of a CWAS is a better way to advance the mutual interests of the public, the providers and the Airport. C. The CWAS must be capable of transmitting two broad classes of services, which for the purposes of this RFP are designated as "commercial services" and "private services", are defined as follows: 1. Commercial Services include, without limitation: (i.) licensed commercial Wireless Telecommunications Services as defined in 47 C.F.R. Part 1.F., delivered by means of cellular, PCS, paging and conventional and enhanced specialized mobile radio technology or other radio technology; (ii) licensed wideband local multipoint distribution service; and (iii) unlicensed wireless Internet access services using the IEEE 802.11 protocol, or comparable technology. 2. Private services include, without limitation: land mobile radio services used by Airlines and other airport tenants, and potentially the Airport itself, for operations, security and public safety. D. The Airport is seeking a company to provide a CWAS that will enable multiple service providers to offer Commercial Services to the public at the Airport. The successful Proposer will be expected to actively seek commercial wireless providers interested in improving cellular phone and other wireless service coverage within the Airport terminal building. The Proposer will also be expected to market its services to Airport tenants and other users of Private Services. The Airport does not guarantee the existence of any market or customer base for any of the services a CWAS might provide. The Airport intends to grant the successful Proposer the non-exclusive right to install and maintain a CWAS at the Airport, but the Airport does not purport to grant or offer exclusive access to any market or class of customers. The successful vendor will work with Commercial Wireless Providers' equipment within specified Airport facilities. 12 E. The specific goals for the CWAS are: 1. To allow members of the public to obtain reliable, seamless wireless communications coverage at the Airport, from the providers of their choice. 2. To allow providers of Commercial Services nondiscriminatory access to a single facility capable of extending such services throughout the Airport. 3. To offer members of the public high speed Wi-Fi Internet access. 4. To offer airlines and other Airport tenants access to a comprehensive wireless communications infrastructure, for the transmission of Private Services. 5. To minimize disruption to the infrastructure of the Airport and make the most efficient use of physical space at the Airports. 6. To provide the Airport with fair compensation for the use of the Airport's property in connection with the delivery of communications services, and the other privileges granted by a CWAS Agreement. 7. To accommodate the existing technological and capacity requirements for wireless communications services with the capability to add capacity and to support emerging technologies as the need arises. SECTION II - COMPANY RESPONSIBILITIES A. The selected Proposer shall be responsible for the design, installation, operation, management, and maintenance of a CWAS at the Airport, and for marketing the services of the CWAS. The CWAS shall be designed to accommodate Targe numbers of simultaneous users over several radio bands, as described in Section III. During the term of the Agreement, the selected Proposer shall own and maintain the CWAS at its expense. At the conclusion of the Agreement, the Airport shall have the option to take ownership of the CWAS or to require its removal. B. CWAS design requirements must be based on the collected technical and coverage requirements of the Airport, the commercial telecommunications service providers, and the users of private wireless services who can reasonably be anticipated to utilize the system. The system should also be capable of supporting the needs of the Airport, airlines and other Airport tenants. The CWAS must comply with all applicable rules, regulations and license requirements of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Airport. C. The design, installation, operation, management, maintenance and marketing of the CWAS shall be financed by the selected Proposer at no cost to the Airport. Similarly, the Proposer will be solely responsible for all costs associated with upgrading the CWAS infrastructure to provide continuous access to existing and new wireless technologies as they emerge and become commercially viable. D. The Airport terminal building is equipped with an existing cabling infrastructure, and to the maximum extend possible, this existing backbone should be utilized for the proposed CWAS. The Proposer shall submit a detailed wiring plan for review and approval by the Airport prior to the installation of any additional cables or equipment. All cabling shall be installed using existing wire trays, and the installation of cables and other equipment required for the proposed CWAS shall be provided by the selected Proposer at no expense to the Airport. The interconnection of the landline network facilities shall be at a telecommunications demarcation point as determined 13 by the Airport. The demarcation point(s) may be relocated in the future as determined by the Airport. E. The selected Proposer will be required to ensure that the installation and operation of the proposed CWAS will not interfere with FAA operations and equipment or other existing licensed users, including the Airport's radio systems, or with any tenant's private wireless requirements. If any such interference occurs, the selected Proposer shall be responsible for taking any steps needed to eliminate or mitigate the interference. Significant interference may be cause for shutting down the CWAS and for terminating the Agreement. F. The selected Proposer will be required to cooperate and coordinate its installation, maintenance and operation of the CWAS with the Airport, the Airport's designated telecommunications management consultants and Dane County Information Management staff. G. The selected Proposer will be required to develop and implement a plan to migrate any existing or legacy wireless systems to the CWAS. Certain existing wireless systems conducted by Airport tenants may be interested in using the CWAS rather than separate systems or equipment. The selected Proposer will be expected to prepare a list of existing wireless systems in operation at the Airport within forty-five (45) days after the execution of the Agreement awarded as a result of this RFP. H. As one component of its marketing efforts, the selected Proposer shall diligently contact and offer nondiscriminatory access to the CWAS to all providers currently offering or providing wireless services within a five -mile radius of the terminal building of the Airport, and shall continue to pursue such opportunities diligently for the duration of the Agreement. The selected Proposer shall also provide non-discriminatory access to any other provider that requests it. The selected Proposer may engage in negotiations with individual providers, as necessary to meet the unique needs of such providers, provided that the fundamental terms of contracts with providers do not result in unreasonable discrimination among providers. The selected Proposer shall develop a legal or contractual mechanism by which the diverse and evolving needs of multiple telecommunications service providers can be addressed in a neutral, non-discriminatory manner. The Airport retains the right to approve the selected Proposer's proposed pricing for access to the CWAS. All agreements executed by the selected Proposer shall be assigned to the Airport at the expiration or termination of the Agreement. Each contract with a commercial wireless provider shall permit its assignment without approval of the commercial wireless provider. SECTION III - SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS A. The CWAS shall be capable of delivering wireless voice, data, and video communications services to Airport passengers, tenants, employees, patrons, and visitors while on Airport property or within Airport facilities, as they occupy or roam through defined authorized access areas. B. The CWAS to be provided by the selected Proposer must use technology designed to accommodate the technological and capacity requirements of multiple wireless carriers in a non- discriminatory manner. Its design and installation must be performed in a manner that will make efficient use of space at the Airport. In addition, the Airport desires to minimize the amount of copper and fiber optic cabling placed at the Airport facilities. C. The system's infrastructure must accommodate all existing and/or reasonably foreseeable emerging commercial RF services, unlicensed RF services and technologies, to include, but not limited to, (a) cellular telephones; (b) Personal Communications Systems (PCS); (c) pagers; (d) 14 wireless Internet devices; (e) two-way radio; and (f) other wireless devices in demand by the traveling public and users at the Airport. D. The installation and operation of the CWAS must not interfere with FAA operations and equipment or other existing licensed users, including, without limitation, the Airport's UHF or other radio systems and any tenant's private wireless requirements. E. The proposed CWAS should be capable of accommodating both Commercial Services and Private Services, including existing wireless systems identified in the selected Proposer's migration plan. F. The proposed CWAS must be capable of permitting, to the maximum extent desirable, the co - location of multiple commercial wireless providers and access system equipment at identified locations within the Airport's facilities or on the Airport's property. SECTION IV — AIRPORT PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Each Proposal must include complete and detailed written responses to the following items in the order stated below. Each response will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria stated in the RFP. A. TECHNICAL DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 1. The selected Proposer shall be responsible for the design and implementation of the CWAS. The Proposer shall provide a recommended conceptual system design and implementation plan with its response to this RFP, including a description of the proposed system using illustrations, renderings and/or schematic plans for the location of all proposed CWAS equipment. The Proposal shall include descriptions, pictures and quantities of all equipment recommended for the proposed CWAS. The Airport anticipates that the successful Proposer will require (i) head -end space for locating its principal transmitting and receiving equipment; (ii) space in one or more equipment rooms for locating additional equipment and for interconnecting with wireline facilities to be installed by the Proposer within the Airport, and for interconnecting with existing land line connections to off -Airport locations; (iii) multiple locations for locating wireless Internet access equipment and microcell transceivers; and (iv) limited access to ducts and conduits for placement of intemal wireline connections. Accordingly, Proposals shall include exhibits addressing the following topics: (i) system engineering design; (ii) description of equipment; (iii) equipment space site plan; (iv) head -end space site plan; and (v) wireless access point locations. 2. The Proposer shall address each of the following technical requirements in its proposal submission: a. Describe how the CWAS will accommodate each provider of Commercial Services using the following criteria: • Frequency Range/Spectrum • Modulation • Multiple Access Method b. Describe how the CWAS may accommodate Private Services. c. To the extent not expressly addressed in paragraphs 2a and 2b above, describe how the CWAS will accommodate Legacy Systems. 15 d. Describe the proposed CWAS infrastructure as it refers to supported coverage areas, frequencies, power supply, performance, capacity, hand off with micro/overlay networks and the commercial wireless provider interface. e. Describe how the proposed CWAS has been designed to integrate with the migration of emerging wireless technologies, spectrum, standards and protocols. f. Describe how the proposed CWAS design and implementation will accommodate, to the maximum extent possible, the co -location of multiple service providers and access system equipment at identified locations within the Airport's facilities or on Airport's property. g. Describe how the proposed CWAS will ensure that the installation of its RF system will not interfere with FAA operations and equipment or other existing licensed users, including the Airport's radio systems and the existing private wireless operations of tenants. h. Describe how the Proposer shall resolve any interference caused by the CWAS to any of the Airport's radio systems or to other existing wireless systems operating at the Airport. Detail if the suitable resolution may require the purchase and installation of filters and/or the relocation of cabling or other infrastructure. i. Describe the types of RF interference that might arise at the Airport as a result of the installation and operation of the CWAS and provide information pertinent to the methodology that would be employed to resolve any such interference in the following situations: J. 1. Interference with the Airport's radio systems. 2.Interference between commercial wireless providers using the CWAS; 3.CWAS interference with existing Airport and tenant radio systems; and 4.CWAS interference with off -Airport wireless facilities. Describe how the proposed CWAS will provide coverage and capacity to all public areas at the Airport, including without limitation, how the CWAS design will fill wireless service coverage area gaps that are identified within the Airport's facilities and into which service providers require or desire access for their current and anticipated subscribers. k. Describe the alarm, support services and response procedures provided in the proposed CWAS infrastructure. I. Describe how the proposed CWAS will benefit the Airport and any additional capabilities it may provide for security, safety, redundancy, etc. m. Describe how the proposed CWAS can provide greater capacity if and when required. n. Describe how the proposed CWAS will manage unlicensed spectrum for maximum throughput, minimum interference and open access for all applications. Further describe which 2.4 GHz Internet/LAN standard the proposed CWAS would use to provide maximum throughput with minimal interference. 16 o. Describe the essential technical standards that will be required of all of the commercial wireless entrants to gain access to the proposed CWAS as they apply to the items below. • Radios • Isolators • Filters • Antennas • Combiners • Conductors • Connectors • Grounding • Shielding • Power Limits p. Describe how the Proposer intends to conduct interference testing and monitoring. 3. Detail the proposed capital expenditures planned by the Proposer for the full buildout of its proposed CWAS. Projected dates for the CWAS build -out and all major capital expenditures must be included. B. MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS 1. The Proposer must describe how it will manage all activities and operations pertaining to the proposed CWAS including, but not limited to, the design, installation, operation, management, maintenance and, marketing of the system. The Proposer shall demonstrate that its plan will provide the necessary management expertise, sound business practices and competent, trained staff to support all classes of service inhabiting the system. The selected Proposer will be expected to develop an Operating and Procedures Manual prior to the start of CWAS operations and, to address relevant quality assurance, safety, security, system testing, and maintenance issues at initiation of the project as well as periodically during the term of the agreement. Proposals shall therefore include exhibits setting forth (i) the construction standards to be used in installing the CWAS; and (ii) a test plan for ensuring that the CWAS complies with the proposed system design. 2. The Proposal shall describe the location, functions, and operation of its local Project Management Office. The successful Proposer shall be required to establish such an office within reasonable proximity to the Airport to permit service issues to be responded to at the airport within one hour from the time the issue has been reported. A project manager shall be named in the Proposal whose resume shall be included in the Proposal. The local project manager shall be responsible for the implementation and management of all aspects of the day-to-day operation of the CWAS. The project manager will handle all wireless related requests, as well as routine and non -routine maintenance of the system. The proposal shall state how the project manager will identify system failures and how the prompt response and repair of such failures can be accomplished. This individual must have at least three (3) years of continuous experience in the wireless industry. This individual shall also be the single point of contact (POC) for the Airport and shall be responsible for the fulfillment of the requirements outlined herein. The project manager shall attend meetings with Airport personnel, including those addressing routine and emergency maintenance issues as required by the Airport. 3. The Proposer must provide an implementation plan to include a schedule detailing all major events and time of completion for each event. Completion of the CWAS will be defined as the date and time when all system components are fully installed and operational according to manufacturer specifications. Any critical assumptions regarding implementation must be described in the Proposal. 17 4. To the maximum extent possible, the implementation and operation of the CWAS will be undertaken so as to minimize disruption to the Airport's facilities and operations. Installation of the necessary infrastructure must be coordinated and approved by the Airport. 5. The Proposer must describe the account management and billing system that the Proposer is proposing to use in tracking, verifying, and invoicing for revenues due to the Proposer and the Airport. 6. The Proposer shall provide a Marketing Plan that it is proposing to use in developing revenue from potential users of the CWAS. 7. The Proposer shall describe the fee structure the Proposer propose(s) for the CWAS services the Proposer plans to offer, including commercial services and, if applicable, private services. 8. The Proposer shall describe the process by which it intends to conduct negotiations with potential users and afford such users nondiscriminatory access to the CWAS. 9. The Proposer must: (a) identify the person or persons who will be responsible for equipment maintenance; (b) provide an equipment maintenance schedule; (c) identify a response time to address equipment failure, service problems, etc. for all hours of each day; and (d) provide a maintenance and service log for each piece of equipment. If maintenance is to be subcontracted, the Proposer shall provide the name and location of the proposed subcontractor. 10. It shall be the sole responsibility of the Proposer to demonstrate in its proposal that it will provide adequate services, material equipment and labor to perform the services as described in the RFP. The Airport shall not be responsible for any omissions or errors made in the proposal. The Proposer shall be equally responsible for conducting all surveys and research required to gain a complete understanding of this RFP. C. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS 1. The Proposer's proposal must demonstrate that the Proposer, its managers, and other designated key personnel assigned to this project are sufficiently experienced and fully qualified to manage all aspects of the CWAS project as described in Section IV. A -B, of this RFP. 2. The Proposer must describe its experience in the design, installation, operation, management, maintenance and marketing of a CWAS or comparable facility similar in size and complexity to that required by this RFP. This includes, as applicable, providing the length, status and scope of any existing or prior CWAS or similar installation it has designed, installed, operated, managed, maintained and marketed. The Proposer must also provide similar information for all locations in which its principals, owners or, its proposed management personnel have performed similar functions for a CWAS operation, or a comparable facility within the last five (5) years. Names and current telephone numbers of references relative to any current or prior CWAS operations must be provided. If any of the current or prior operational locations are or were at airports, this information must be specifically noted to include length of service and scope of operations. The aforementioned entities may be contacted by the Airport to obtain information regarding the Proposer's operation and performance, including, but not limited to, such subjects as effectiveness and quality of the operation, the record of complaints, financial status, timeliness of payments and overall satisfaction with performance. 18 3. The Proposer must provide in its proposal a list of all key personnel to be assigned to perform this Agreement, including their individual experience and qualifications. The Proposer must also identify the proposed time commitment of the key personnel assigned to this agreement. 4. In the event the Proposer anticipates the establishment of a new business entity, or a subsidiary or a spin-off of an existing entity to perform the services contemplated under this RFP, sufficient data must be provided to demonstrate the financial capability of the proposed entity including letters of credit in an adequate amount to finance the operations required under this RFP. The Airport reserves the right to request a guarantee from a parent company(ies) that proposes to establish a new business entity. 5. If the Proposer is a joint venture, the above information must be supplied for each venturer. If the Proposer contemplates offering certain elements of the CWAS pursuant to subcontracts, sufficient data with respect to each subcontractor must be provided to demonstrate that it has the requisite experience to perform the functions described herein, and provide assurances to the Airport of the financial capability of the proposed subcontractor to perform the specified function. 6. The Proposer must be qualified to do business in the State of Wisconsin at the time of execution of the Agreement. 7. The Proposal must state whether, a) the Proposer; b) any corporation or other entity which has either directly or indirectly a controlling interest in the Proposer; c) any subsidiary corporation or other entity in the Proposer has a controlling interest; or d) any other affiliate of the Proposer has, a) filed for bankruptcy or reorganization with the past seven (7) years, and if so, explain the circumstances and status of the proceeding; b) been suspended or barred from bidding on govemment (federal, state, local) or airport contracts, and if so, explain the current status of said suspension or debarment, or, c) had any contract(s) terminated either voluntarily or involuntarily within the past five (5) years, and if so, identify the contract(s). If the Proposer is a joint venture, then the above information must be provided for each participant in the joint venture. D. FINANCIAL OFFER & FINANCIAL ABILITY TO PERFORM 1. Each Proposer must provide a detailed Pro Forma for each year of the proposed Agreement detailing expected revenues and expenses of the CWAS with supporting business assumptions. The Pro Forma will be in sufficient detail as to allow for the ( evaluation of the Proposers proposed financial offer. Proposers are expected to provide a financial proposal that is consistent with its proposed fee structure, including the amount the Proposer intends to charge each wireless provider for access to the CWAS. The Airport's preferred revenue sharing approach calls for agreements with wireless providers to include provisions that will enable the Proposer to adequately and reliably report the fees to which the Airport is entitled. 2. Each Proposer must provide a financial offer to the Airport in the form of a percentage of Gross Receipts received by the Proposer in the operation of the CWAS applied against forecasted revenues in the Proposers Pro Forma. The Proposer with the highest percentage of Gross Receipts will receive the highest score and the remaining Proposers' scores will be prorated based on their percentage proposed. 3. Proposers are expected to provide in their proposal a discussion of the form of agreement they believe to be the appropriate vehicle to govem the relationship between the selected Proposer and the wireless providers; and, to provide the terms that will govem the obligation to report the preferred usage information. 19 .Cautionary words about Wi-Fi DailyBreeze.com Thursday, January 06, 2005 Cautionary words about Wi-Fi Page 1 of 2 PRINTTHIS With the Hermosa Beach City Council set to vote next week on creating a citywide wireless Internet system for its residents, some public policy analysts are offering some cautionary words about such Wireless Fidelity, or Wi-Fi, networks. Researchers at the Chicago -based Heartland Institute and the New Millennium Research Council, which analyzes telecommunications and technology, contend that U.S. cities have a poor track record when it comes to telecommunications. In addition, "there also are other reasons that make it unlikely that the promised Wi-Fi utopia will ever materialize." Wi-Fi boosters argue that offering city residents "free" Internet access will expand local economies and help those who currently can't afford broadband or, at least up until now, have not been motivated to tap into the new technology. In a briefing paper titled "Why City -Run 'Free' Wi-Fi Access Won't Work," the researchers note that Tacoma, Wash., and Ashland, Ore., each attempted to create public broadband networks. Tacoma initially estimated capital costs at $40 million, but by 2002 the city had spent more than $100 million. Ashland, which hoped to have its system running at a profit by 2004, now projects a 10 -year loss. The authors conclude that claims about wireless technology being cheaper and easier than "wired" systems remain unproved. And they question whether "free" wireless Internet access would really benefit lower income residents who can't afford other options, such as DSL. Would-be users, the authors say, may need some basic training, not to mention equipment such as wireless network cards, to receive the service. Hermosa officials have estimated that a user's set-up costs would run between $75 and $150. We don't mean to short-circuit Hermosa's hopes for a municipal wireless Internet system. Certainly, if the city can offset the ongoing costs of a Wi-Fi system with advertising money or other private sources, and if most of the residents are computer -savvy and bullish about the idea, the city may indeed make a go of it. But we would urge city officials to make sure their plans are on sound financial footing. Innovation, for sure, is something to be encouraged. But years ago, in Gardena, a municipal insurance company and a first-time homeowners program were also labeled innovative. Today, the debts that piled up from those ideas continue to place a cloud over the city's future. Hermosa residents need to determine whether Wi-Fi will put them on the crest of technological progress or leave them subject to unacceptable financial risks. http ://www.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=Cautionary+words+about+Wi... 1/6/2005 3100 Ocean Park Blvd., Suite 300 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Adelphia Writer's Direct: (310) 314-8922 Fax: (310) 314-8979 Internet: www.adelphia.com E-mail: tom.carlock@adelphia.com January 5, 2005 Mr. Steve Burrell City Manager City of Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Municipal Wi-Fi Project Dear Mr. Burrell: I am writing on behalf of Adelphia Communications to discuss the City of Hermosa Beach's proposed Wi-Fi project. I had hoped to attend in person the November 15, 2004 City Council meeting in which the project was discussed, but unfortunately my schedule did not permit me to do so. Our outside counsel, Jeremy Stern, briefly expressed the company's legal and policy concerns about the City spending its own money to invest in a new communications system in a very competitive market. This letter is written as a follow up to provide you with some additional information and to raise several issues that should be addressed before the City steps out of its governmental role and into its "proprietary" role by taking on the very risky venture of trying to build and operate a new broadband system in an already intensely competitive market. To begin, we have seen over the years many municipal efforts to enter the private sector in a proprietary capacity and try to compete in the marketplace fail miserably. The experience of the City of Gardena entering the insurance business is a very recent (and close) example of what can happen when market conditions change and business projections are not met. Gardenia now faces a $26 million budget deficit and the prospect of bankruptcy.' Cities have not faired much better in their efforts to enter the competitive telecommunications or video arena. Many studies conducted over the years have confirmed that: 1) municipal broadband systems are not profitable; 2) municipal H. Becerra, Debt Has City on the Ropes, Los Angeles Times, Part B., p.1 (Dec. 10, 2004) Letter to Steve Burrell January 5, 2005 Page2of2 broadband systems require increased taxes or financial contributions from general funds to cover operating losses; 3) revenue is typically overestimated and expenses are under-estimated.2 Because of the lackluster performance of "municipalized" broadband systems, the entire community ends up paying a "broadband tax" for a service which, unlike water, gas and electric service, not all Hermosa Beach residents will use. Beyond the tax and fiscal implications of Hermosa Beach's proposed city-wide Wi-Fi project, there are many other policy, practical and policy implications to the venture that the City should consider during deliberations on the matter in January. First, as a Wi-Fi provider, the City would become subject to the full range of compliance obligations under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. For example, as an ISP, Adelphia regularly receives "take down" notices from parties that believe that particular conduct over the Internet is illegal. ISPs have costly compliance obligations, and if they do not fulfill those obligations, then under the DMCA the ISPs could be subject to substantial copyright liability. In addition, ISPs have obligations under the PATRIOT Act and CALEA, federal statutes that require ISPs to cooperate with law enforcement in criminal cases, including those involving national security. These obligations all involve additional cost and risk that the City may not have factored into its analysis yet. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. I also hope that we may have an opportunity to meet in person and discuss this matter in greater detail. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Thomas E. Carlock Vice President Law and Public Policy Enclosure 2 The most recent study was prepared by the Heartland Institute, a copy of which I have attached for your reference. No. 105 — October 2004 Municipally Owned Broadband Networks: A Critical Evaluation (Revised Edition) This analysis. revised and updated to reflect national and local changes during the past two years, finds the case for municipal ownership of broadband networks is even weaker than it was then. Broadband services that were scarce two years ago are now plentiful and reasonably priced. New data from communities that attempted to build and operate municipal broadband systems suggest taxpayers would be very much at risk, even under financing schemes involving certificates of participation. A broadband initiative in Illinois' Tri -Cities arca (Batavia. St. Charles. Geneva) continues to be a useful case stud and precautionary lesson for other communities with similar plans. 1. Advocates of municipally owned broadband networks claim they would produce a long list of benefits. Critics say telephone and cable companies are moving too slowly to offer affordable high-speed broadband services to many parts of the country, particularly rural areas and small towns. Public construction and operation of broadband systems. they say, can fill the gap. Among the alleged benefits of municipally owned broadband networks are ubiquitous service, greater efficiency, a boost to economic development efforts, lower prices, and access to enhanced broadband services. 2. Broadband services are already available to virtually everyone who wants them. Unlike two years ago. today virtually everyone who wants broadband services can get Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) service from their telephone company or cable modem service from their cable company. Cable. telephone. and wireless broadband providers have spent billions of dollars rolling out service in areas that were previously underserved. T-1 service is available to businesses over existing telephone lines and Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) service is available from DirecTV and EchoStar. MDS (multipoint distribution service). or wireless cable. is wider deployed in smaller toy% ns. and starting next year. WiMax will be deployed in communities across the country. 2 Municipally Owned Broadband Networks 3. The speed of broadband services is rising and the price is falling. Critics say platforms other than fiber -to -the -home (FTTH) fail to provide an acceptable level of speed and quality, but this too has changed with time. Most broadband platforms operate at speeds dramatically faster than two years ago. DSL now can reach 3 to 6 Mbps (largely in support of video applications), and an enhancement to the standard that can accommodate up to 15 Mbps will begin deployment in 2005. Cable modems provide high-speed data distribution between 500 Kbps and 4 Mbps, and commercial cable modem services can go even higher. Wireless broadband can reach 54 Mbps, depending on several factors. WiMax will offer speeds of between 17 Mbps and 75 Mbps. depending on distance from the tower and other factors. Most broadband platforms operate at speeds dramatically faster than two years ago. While speeds have increased, prices have fallen. SBC offers DSL "Express' service for $26.95/month and "Pro- service for $36.99/month. and T-1 service for around $250.00 per month. Comcast offers free cable modems and Internet access for $42.95/ month. DirecTV offers satellite broadband service for between $99/month and $129/month; after 15 months you own the equipment and the price falls to between $59/month and $89/month. When WiMax arrives, it is likely to cost $25 a month for broadband and $40 to $50 for a package that includes unlimited telephone service. 4. Municipal broadband is not a boon to economic development efforts. Consultants often try to sell municipalities on the idea of building broadband networks by claiming they are essential to economic development efforts, but their reports invariably present no evidence of a Zink between broadband and economic growth. In fact, econometric research consistently finds subsidies to corporations—whether in the form of cheap access to land, sewers, or broadband --are an unreliable and often counterproductive strategy for economic development. Cities and states that make these expenditures do not create jobs or increase personal income at higher rates than cities and states that don't. The expected private benefits of a few users do not justify the cost of connecting every business and household in the community with expensive fiber-optic lines. 5. It is unlikely a public utility would operate as efficiently as competing private companies offering telecommunications services. Another claim commonly made by advocates of municipalization is that public utilities operate more efficiently than private companies. However. research on the costs and quality of public services produced via municipal ownership versus private provision is extensive and conclusive. it shows pr-ivatizanion. not municipalization. delivers significant cost savings. greater accountability and responsiveness to consumers or elected officials. and a level of quality equivalent or superior to public -sector delivery. The claim that municipalization is more efficient than relying on private companies fails on empirical grounds. Municipally Owned Broadband Networks 6. Cities that have attempted to build and operate broadband networks often report Targe losses borne by taxpayers or ratepayers. Of some 55,000 towns and municipalities in the U.S.. only about 200, or 0.5 percent, operate municipal broadband networks. Many communities that have taken the plunge have experienced large losses that must be paid for by taxpayers or ratepayers. For example, Iowa Communications Network "consistently requires large subsidies to continue in business"; California's CALNET system was some $20 million in debt when it was privatized in 1998; Lebanon, Ohio originally projected the cost of building its FTTH network at $5 million and ended up spending $9 million and later had to authorize $14.8 million in mortgage revenue bonds to cover than $35 million operating its municipal broadband network Systems in September 2004. 3 "That's why we should not be in this business—you have to keep reinvesting. ft's negative cash flow once you consider reinvestment of capital." — Bill Dunaway, Mayor Marietta Georgia operating losses; and Marietta, Georgia lost more before it was sold (at a loss) to American Fiber 7. Municipal broadband networks are very risky ventures. Municipal broadband utilities most commonly fail or run deficits because the cost of construction exceeds initial projections and burdens the utility with high debt retirement costs; legal restrictions prevent cities from subsidizing their municipal broadband networks directly with tax dollars or by raising rates for other utilities; optimistic projections of the number of customers delivered by contract -seeking consultants have misled many city officials; and the failure to find content consumers will pay for limits the appeal of municipal networks. Consultants and municipal officials tend to focus exclusive- ly on bandwidth and the technological advantages of fiber -to -the -home instead of understanding broadband is part of the larger and very competitive entertainment and business services industries. 8. Certificates of participation do not offer a promising alternative form of financing for municipal FTTH networks. Advocates of municipalization have sought ways to reassure voters that their tax dollars would not be at risk in the event the broadband utility begins to lose money or is forced into bankruptcy. One way to do this is to suggest the use of certificates of participation rather than general revenue bonds to finance construction. But it appears no broadband network in the U.S. has ever been financed by certificates of participation. probably because investors view such proiects'as being too risky. In a market where broadband services are already ubiquitous and inexpensive. the\ are almost certainl\ correct. The use of certificates of participation may offer some\ hat more protection to taxpayers than using revenue bonds. but there is a price to pay for that protection. Generally in such cases. ownership of the 4 Municipally Owned Broadband Networks asset is held by the lender while the client—in this case the local governments—pays down the loan. This means the network will not be "community owned" but only leased by local governments from investors. Those investors, in turn, are free to sell the network to other investors or, as one consultant told a group of municipalization advocates on July 7, "we will sell it to Comcast if it doesn't work." Finally, it would be misleading to imply that arranging for private financing of the construction of the FTTH network means taxpayers and ratepayers won't later find themselves "on the hook" to pay for operating costs and upgrades to the system. One of the lessons from other cities that have tried to make municipal broadband networks work but failed is that operating costs per customer are often higher than expected, resulting in the need for annual subsidies. Using certificates of participation would not protect taxpayers and ratepayers from having to pay more to keep the utility operating in the years ahead. 9. Generally speaking, municipal ownership of broadband networks is probably not in the best interests of residents and most businesses. Generally speaking, municipal ownership of broadband networks is probably not in the best interests of residents and most businesses, even in communities not well served today by private providers. Access to broadband services is more plentiful than advocates of municipalization claim or admit, suggesting the real issue is not availability but price and who should pay it. Access to broadband services is more plentiful than advocates of municipalization claim or admit, suggesting the real issue is not availability but price and who should pay it. It is unlikely that more than a small number of residents would benefit from a municipally owned broadband network, that their benefits would justify the steep cost, or that it is fair to force other residents and businesses to subsidize them. It is fanciful to imagine that municipal broadband is a cost-effective way to promote economic development. Very few cities attempt to build and own broadband networks because the costs and financial risks are too great. Cities that have taken the leap simply illustrate the riskiness of the venture, costing their taxpayers and ratepayers millions of dollars in subsidies with no end in sight. Threatening to build a municipal broadband network may have been a good strategy two years ago. to prompt incumbent cable and telephone companies to make good on past promises. Following through with municipalization, however, is not a good idea. Based on Hear/lund Policy Study 1:105. "Municipally Owned Broadband Networks: A Critical Evaluation (revised edition). by Joseph L. Bast. Copies are available from The Heartland Institute for S10 each. Copyright 2004 The Heartland Institute. Nothing in this Ie ecus ve Summary should he construed as reflecting the \ ices of The heartland institute. nor as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of am legislation. Permission is hereby given to reprint or quote from this E.xecuthe Summar: please send tearshecc to The 11eartland Institute. 19 South LaSalle Sura i\,903. Chicago. Illinois 60603. OOOestions' Call us at 312!377-4000 or isit our \\ eb site 31 PYA/'\.heanland.org. No. 105 — October 2004 Municipally Owned Broadband Networks: A Critical Evaluation (Revised Edition) By Joseph L. Bast' Introduction Two years ago, in 2002, 1 weighed in on the pros and cons of municipal ownership of broadband networks. 1 used as a case study a fiber -to -the -home (FTTH) plan that was the subject of a referendum in three suburban Chicago communities --Geneva. St. Charles. and Batavia, the so-called Tri -Cities. At the end of the.22-page analysis, 1 wrote: This analysis finds the case for municipal ownership is even weaker than it was two years ago. Generally speaking. municipal ownership of broadband networks is probably not in the best interests of residents and most businesses, even in communities not well served today by private providers. Access to broadband services in the Tri -Cities is more plentiful than advocates of municipalization claim or admit, suggesting the real issue is not availability but price and who should pay it. 1 commended elected officials in the Tri -Cities "for moving cautiously so far" and discussing their options with companies in their area, studying other cities, and commissioning a study of the municipalization option. ] warned. "they will need to greet the finished study with healthy skepticism. since the consultants have a financial interest in advocating municipalization, but the report should provide some valuable guidance nonetheless." 'Joseph Bast is president of The Heartland Institute, a national nonprofit research organization based in Chicago. A brief biography appears on page 30. Neither the author nor The Heartland Institute has a financial interest in the outcome of this debate. © 2004 The Heartland Institute. Nothing in this report should be construed as necessarily representing the views of The Heartland Institute nor as intended to aid or oppose passage of legislation. For more information about The Heartland Institute, see page 30 of this report Despite what I thought was the moderate tone of my report, local officials were swift and harsh in their criticism of its As l predicted, the consultants produced an uncritical report calling for a taxpayer -financed broadband system. Rather than show the "healthy skepticism" 1 had recommended, local officials embraced the consultants' report. But voters, not consultants and city bureaucrats or even mayors, had the last word on this subject. They rejected the broadband initiative at the polls by a vote of 60 percent to 40 percent on April 1, 2003.3 This year, the advocates of municipal broadband are back again, flogging another consultant's report and once again asking voters to approve the plan by referenda. This year, the advocates of municipal broadband are back again, flogging another consultant's report and once again asking voters to approve the plan by referenda." This time, the plan relies on a different funding mechanism, called certificates of participation, which its advocates claim will immunize the area's taxpayers from liability in the event of cost overruns or bankruptcy. This analysis. revised and updated to reflect national and local changes since the original analysis, finds the case for municipal ownership is even weaker than it was two years ago. Broadband services that were scarce two years ago are now plentiful and reasonably priced. New data from communities that attempted to build and operate municipal broadband systems suggest taxpayers would be very much at risk, even under the new financing scheme. The Tri -Cities proposal continues to be a useful case study and precautionary lesson for other communities with similar plans. Summary of findings Advocates of fiber -to -the -home (FTTH) municipal broadband systems claim a long list of benefits would accrue to local businesses and residents, including "ubiquitous' access to higher speed and more reliable broadband services, lower prices, more efficient operation of municipal utilities. and a boost to local economic development efforts. However. this analysis finds little proof to support those claims and considerable evidence in support of the following conclusions: 2 See Tona Kunz, "Municipal cable service knocked by think tank," Daily Herald, November 2, 2002; Brenda Schory, "Report: Broadband Will Not Work," Kane County Chronicle, October 31, 2002; Brenda Schory, "Geneva Officials Set Private Broadband Meeting," Kane County Chronicle, November 17, 2002. 3 Brenda Schory, "Voters Reject Broadband, Broadband Goes Down in Flames," Kane County Chronicle, April 2, 2003. ' Approval of the referenda is required, but each city council must also take action to authorize the creation of the new utility. Oddly, voters in the city of Geneva face three referenda, none of which uses the words "broadband," "fiber optic," or "Internet." Instead, they ask voters to authorize a "community antenna television system." "a public utility for telephone service," and/or "operate for hire a public telephone service." # Broadband services sufficient to meet the needs of residents and business are now available to nearly every residence and business in the U.S., including previously under -served areas such as the Tri -Cities. # The speed of broadband services is rising and the price is falling, revealing the presence of fierce competition, major new investments, and continuous technological change. # There is no evidence showing municipal investments in broadband lead to faster economic growth or higher personal incomes. # Very few cities attempt to build and own broadband telecommunications networks, and those that have taken the plunge report higher than expected costs and large operating losses borne by taxpayers. # Municipal broadband networks are very risky ventures owing to the cost and time required to construct the systems. legal restrictions on subsidies from other utilities. inaccurate projections of the number of consumers, and other common errors. Generally speaking, municipal ownership of broadband networks is probably not in the best interests of residents and most businesses. # Certificates of participation offer an alternative form of financing for municipal F ITH networks that appears to reduce the risk faced by taxpayers, but this method of financing has problems and risks of its own. # Generally speaking, municipal ownership of broadband networks is probably not in the best interests of residents and most businesses. 1. A municipal broadband proposal In May 2002. city officials from the Tri -Cities agreed to pay $97.500 to United Telesystems Inc. (UTI), a Georgia -based consulting finm, to study the feasibility of the municipalities constructing and managing their own broadband infrastructure system.' As expected. the UTI report called for the Tri -Cities to capitalize, construct. and operate a fiber -to -the -home (`FTTH") broadband network to provide the following services: # Broadband Video Services (Cable Television) # High Speed Broadband Internet Access # Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Telephone Service # Long Distance Telephone Service Tona Kunz. "Tri -Cities to Study Plan to Create Its Own Cable Company," Daily Herald, May 7, 2002. - 3 - # Local and Wide Area Telecommunications Networking # Fiber Optic Transport # Utility Managements In Batavia, for example, UTI called for running 117 miles of cable past 10,098 potential residential and business customers and predicted 5,258 would become actual customers. UTI predicted most potential residential customers would sign up for TV (34 percent), while 13.1 percent would sign up for high-speed data and 7.5 percent for telephone service. Seventeen -and - a -half percent of potential commercial customers would sign up for high-speed data services and 11.3 percent for telephone service. UTI predicted 41.5 percent of potential residential consumers and 23.3 percent of commercial units would subscribe to at least one service. Also according to the UTI proposal, building the new utility would cost between $57 million and $62 million. The "total projected capital per customer service unit" for Batavia would be $3,539. The operating cash flow statement for Batavia projected positive EBITA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation. and amortization) starting in the second year and continuing through the tenth year. Total fund equity (total assets minus liabilities), however, would be negative for the entire 10 -year period. Building the new utility would cost $62 million. The "total projected capital per customer service unit" for Batavia would be $3,539. Since the last referendum was defeated in April 2003, the organization campaigning for municipalization, Fiber for Our Future,' has revised the plan to address what seemed to be referendum opponents' strongest argument, that local taxpayers would be at risk should the utility prove unable to compete with private broadband service providers. While the UTI proposal appears to remain the plan under consideration, a neve consultant, Aggregate Networks LLC, was asked to come up with an alternative financing vehicle. Aggregate Networks is a small business located in Lisle, Illinois that advises private and public entities and brokers financing for broadband networks and initiatives. Instead of relying on general obligation bonds, Aggregate Networks says the plan could be financed privately by certificates of participation,' an unsecured debt instrument in which the lender typically retains title to the asset while the lease is paid down by the municipality on an agreed-upon schedule. The asset itself serves as collateral. 6 United Telesystems, Inc., "Broadband Network Initiative," September 20, 2002. See www.tricitiesbroadband.com for various position statements posted by Fiber for Our Future. 'Rick Kaufmann. cofounder of Aggregate Networks, remarks on July 7, 2004 at a briefing sponsored by Fiber for Our Future held at the Batavia City Hall. His recorded presentation is available at www.tricitiesbroadband.com. -4- 2. Why consider municipal ownership? According to the Web site of The Merton Group, a subsidiary of Merton Capital, a corporation that has arranged financing for FTTH networks in several communities in the United States, municipalities "should consider building and operating their own broadband infrastructure because broadband access to homes has not been met [sic] in suburban/rural America and is not likely to be niet in the near future by incumbents primarily due to the following reasons: # "The current economic environment and incumbent health, especially as regards to telecom, makes such deployment highly unlikely in the near future. # "Regulatory and legal delays caused by the 1996 Telecom act and initiated by the RBOCs - have resulted in institutional stalemates and excessive cost factors to make a corporate environment the most inefficient path to broadband deployment.' The same Web site then goes on to present the alleged benefits to communities that build and operate municipal FTTH networks: # "Ubiquitous Coverage: The current business economic climate will not permit incumbents to establish and operate fiber -to -the -home type broadband networks. especially in sparsely populated areas. A mission -driven initiative by a town to bring broadband to its citizens appears to be the only solution to the quandary. Advocates of municipal broadband networks claim a long list of benefits accrue to local businesses and residents. # "Efficiency: A town -private enterprise partnership may be able to leverage Rights of Way and existing fiber strands installed by a municipally owned power utility, as well as corresponding telecommunications systems and facilities like backup power equipment, network monitoring systems, remote terminals and associated real estate. # "Enhanced Sen'ices: Through unbundling of its broadband network to service providers, the town could spur a diversity of value-added products including Voice over IP. flexible bandwidth. digital cable, video on demand, streaming media. etc. # "Economic Development: A broadband network could act as a magnet to businesses. A common concern for both new technology as \\ ell as traditional businesses is the presence of a reliable high-speed communications system. http://mertongroup.com/fagmbn.html # "A Community Asset: A local pervasive broadband system operating profitably could improve the tax base and be a real asset to the town. It could also favorably change the property taxes in the area as well as improve the credit standing of the town so that cost of borrowing is reduced. # "Competition: It is a common fact that a town, by operating its own broadband network, can favorably influence the pricing as well as quality of communications service provided by private operators to its citizens. # "Lower Life Cycle Costs: By installing an open -access fiber broadband system that is marginally over -engineered, the need for future upgrades and installations can be minimized. In addition, street -diggings can be avoided as well since fiber cables have a life span of 20 years. # "Improved Government IT Integration and E -Government: Govemment data systems could be better integrated and business/technical processes standardized. E-govemment services such as tax collection, payroll, utility services and billing could be offered online in a broadband environment. # "Security: The need for an integrated high-speed communications infrastructure at both a national and a local level has taken on new meaning after September 11th, 2001. No local government can ignore the importance of having a reliable broadband communications network connecting hospitals, schools, businesses and broadcast companies to provide notification and rapid response in the event of emergencies." "The number one reason to vote yes," according to Annie Collins, "is for economic development." Annie Collins, chairwoman of Fiber for Our Future, echoed this rationale in comments to the Batavia Chamber of Commerce in September 2004, saying the new network would offer such possibilities as telemedicine and remote meter reading by the cities' electric utilities. "The number one reason to vote yes," according to Collins. "is for economic development. Economic development comes from having an infrastructure in place that allows local businesses to excel and encourages new businesses to locate in the Tri-Cities."10 Terrence McCarty and Ravi Bhagavan, two principals with The Merton Group. attempted to make the case for municipal broadband in a 2002 policy paper." They claimed. in the conclusion of their essay. that "it is clear from this analysis that a municipal broadband network is very 0 Jan Ramming. "Chamber Endorses Municipal Broadband," The Sun [Batavia], September 29, 2004. ' Terrence P. McGarty and Ravi Bhagavan, "Municipal Broadband Networks: A Revised Paradigm of Ownership." The Merton Group, 2002. http://www.mertongroup.com/Municipal%20Broadband%20Networks.pdf -6- viable. In fact, it may be the only way certain areas will be able to get such broadband facilities. If a town views the existence to broadband [sic] as both a social imperative as well as an essential element to retain and attract businesses, then the ability of the town to implement this service will be critical.' The Merton Group paper does not, in fact, support any of those conclusions. The authors, for example, make no attempt to document the link between broadband access and economic development. present no data on the success or failure of communities that have attempted municipalization, and do not discuss the cost and risks associated with municipalization. Most of The Merton Group paper consists of attacks on the motives and litigation tactics of the Baby Bells, andlit ends with a superficial overview of the steps local officials should take when considering municipalization. In any case, as will be reported below, developments of the past two years have proven them to be wrong. The Merton Group paper does not, in fact, support any of those conclusions. In any case, as will be reported below, developments of the past two years have proven them to be wrong. 3. Access, quality, and price of broadband services How ubiquitous is broadband currently, and how do its quality and price compare to that promised by the advocates of F l"1 H networks? These questions address three of the nine alleged benefits claimed by The Merton Group. Ubiquity of broadband access In 2001. a survey of residents in the Tri -Cities showed 79.3 percent had cable service and 77.4 percent had Internet access, but of those with Internet access, 95.2 percent relied on dial-up modems. which by definition is not high-speed access. Digital Subscriber Line (DSL)13 was available only within 3.3 miles of SBC Ameritech's switching station in Geneva.14 AT&T- Comcast's cable network was not upgraded to accommodate cable modems.15 12 Ibid., p. 33. 13 Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) provides high-speed digital modem technology via a conventional telephone line using signal frequencies above those used by voice or fax, so the DSL signal does not interfere with telephone conversations or faxes. 14 Eric Schelkopf, "City explores cable needs," Kane County Chronicle, August 21, 2001. t5 A cable modem is designed to operate over cable TV lines. Because the coaxial cable used by cable TV provides much greater bandwidth than telephone lines. cable modems are much faster than dial-up modems -7- • Today. according to SBC and Comcast, virtually 100 percent of the region can sign up for DSL and access the Internet via cable modems. In addition. T-1 service16 is available to businesses throughout the Tri -Cities over existing telephone lines and wireless service is available from several dealers, all at significantly lower prices than were being charged just two years ago. Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) service is also available throughout the Tri -Cities from DirecTV and EchoStar. Satellite service has emerged as a serious competitor to cable in recent years, with DirecTV and EchoStar now having some 21.1 million subscribers. Cable companies have spent billions of dollars in the past two years upgrading their systems to provide cable modem service, including approximately $20 million by Comcast just in the Tri -Cities area. water towers, giving virtually the entire village access Another form of wireless broadband service, called MDS (multipoint distribution service), or wireless cable, involves using antennas mounted on water towers or high buildings to deliver high-speed (up to 1.5 million bits per second. or Mbps) Internet access to users. In 2002. South Elgin, for example, contracted with St. Charles -based MCC Technology/Data Moving Company to place antennas on four municipally owned to broadband. The latest entry in wireless broadband is WiMax. WiMax is similar to \k7i-Fi, which coffee shops and hotels use to create "hot spots' for wireless Internet access, except while Wi-Fi serves only a 300 -foot radius, WiMax can reach up to 30 miles. AT&T, MCI, Covad Communications, EarthLink, BellSouth, and Qwest Communications all are apparently considering getting into the WiMax business. According to a recent news story, "The first version of WiMax, expected next year. would beam signals to rooftop antennas. The second phase, slated for 2006. would let customers mount antennas indoors, cutting installation costs. The third phase. in 2007. would put chips in laptops and handhelds, allowing connections anywhere reached by an antenna.."" Intel apparently plans to have WiMax chips in most laptops in three years. Broadband is more widely available in 2004 than in 2002 for several reasons. More bandwidth -hungry content such as on-line movies, Web -cams, and video conferencing is now available to consumers who sign up for broadband, fueling demand for the services. A new technology called voice over Internet Protocol—VoIP—has emerged that allows phone calls to be made over the Internet, giving competitors of telephone companies a new platform from which to offer competitive service.18 i6 A T-1 line is a dedicated phone connection consisting of 24 individual 64 Kbps channels. each of which can be configured to carry voice or data traffic. Telephone companies typically allow customers to lease a fraction of the line. known as fractional T-1 access. 17 Paul Davidson, "Inventive Wireless Providers Go Rural," USA Today, July 14, 2004. *Joseph L. Bast. "VoIP and the End of Monopoly." BYTE.com, April 19, 2004, "Study Predicts VoIP Sector Will Grow 100 -fold by 2008." Telecommunications Report, August 31. 2004. -8- A third and especially important reason for the explosion of broadband services is public policy. Prior to 2002. AT&T and other major cable companies were hesitant to make new investments in expanding cable modem service due to the threat that regulators would require them to share their facilities with competitors. But in March of that year, the FCC ruled cable modems are an "information service" rather than a form of "telecommunications' or "video," and therefore cable companies are exempt from line -sharing requirements. Since then, cable companies have spent billions of dollars upgrading their systems to provide cable modem service, including approximately $20 million by Comcast just in the Tri -Cities area, according to the company.19 SBC Ameritech and other Regional Bell Operating Companies (the so-called "Baby Bells') have been similarly hesitant about investing in expanding DSL and fiber -based broadband services until regulators send a clear signal that they, too, will not be required to share new facilities with competitors. Such regulations currently require phone companies to sell access to their infrastructures using a formula called TELRIC, Prior to 2002, AT&T and other major cable companies were hesitant to make new investments in expanding cable modem service due to the threat that regulators would require them to share their facilities with competitors. for "total element long -run incremental costs." In May 2002 and again in March 2004, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia struck down FCC rules regarding the terms and prices under which Baby Bells must share their lines with competitors. In June 2004 the Bush administration said it would not seek to have the court's ruling overturned, and on October 14 the FCC issued rules saying the Baby Bells do not have to share new "fiber -to -the -curb (FTTC) loops, where fiber is extended within 500 feet of a customer's premises." Since then, SBC and other telephone companies have announced major new investment initiatives in fiber, DSL. and other broadband platforms,20 while companies such as AT&T that had previously relied on the regulations to gain access to the Baby Bell's infrastructure have announced plans to shift their business plans to wireless and Internet - based telephony.21 19 Leigh Ann Hughes, Comcast, personal communication, October 13, 2004. 20 "SBC Communications Announces Advances in Initiative to Develop IP -Based Residential Network for Integrated Video. Internet, VoIP Services," news release, SBC Communications Inc., June 22, 2004; Christopher Rhoads, "Bringing Fiber Home," The Wall Street Journal, August 19, 2004, "SBC to Rapidly Accelerate Fiber Network Deployment in Wake of Positive FCC Broadband Rulings," news release, SBC Communications Inc., October 14, 2004. 21 Ellen Simon. "AT&T Pins Hopes on Technology for Business." Associated Press. August 1. 2004; Almar Latour, "AT&T. Cable Providers Join Forces.' The Wall Street Journal, August 19, 2004. -9- • Speed and quality of FTTH alternatives While the spread of broadband services in the past 24 months was impressive, advocates of municipalization say current offerings are still not fast enough or good enough. A FTTH network, according to a FAQ on the Geneva Web site, "transmits data at a speed up to 100 Mbps, two times faster than the fastest wireless, 50 times faster than a cable modem, and almost 75 times faster than DSL.'42 WiMax, the same document points out, currently cannot offer local (analog) television stations, offers only one or two digital cable channels at a time, and "is not impervious to eavesdropping or interference from other devices, and performance is affected by distance, additional subscribers and line of sight." Those claims overlook the dramatic increase in speed of FTTH alternatives compared to two years ago. Those claims are wrong for several reasons. First, they overlook the dramatic increase in the speed of FTTH alternatives compared to two years ago. Most of the alternatives are now sufficient to meet the demands of most of the residential and business markets, with individual consumers choosing the right service provider based on their needs and the strengths, weaknesses, and prices offered by the competing providers. In 2002, DSL allowed downloads at speeds up to 768,000 bits -per -second and uploads at speeds of 128,000 bits -per -second. Today. DSL can reach 3 to 6 Mbps largely in support of video applications. ADSL 2+, an enhancement to the standard, can accommodate up to 15 Mbps and will begin deployment in 2005.23 These speeds can handle more data -intensive digital applications including video and the large data downloads (e.g., for software upgrades) that telecommuting requires. Cable modems provide data distribution to residences of between 500 Kbps and 4 Mbps and commercial cable modem services can go even higher.24 Wireless broadband can reach 54 Mbps, depending on several factors.25 WiMax will offer speeds of between 17 Mbps and 75 Mbps, depending on distance from the tower and other factors 26 All of these broadband platforms are reporting advances in speed due to technological improvements and the deployment of new lines and more substations and transmitters. All of these FTTH alternatives can deliver high-speed Internet services and telephony. which require downstream speeds of about 1.5 Mbps, though some, such as wireless email. have 22 http://www.geneva.il.us/bb/FAQ.htm 23 Steve Titch, personal correspondence. 24 Ibid. 25 Geneva's Web site, supra note 22. ae "WiMax: How Far? How Fast?' Unstrung, July 8, 2004, citing numbers from Intel Corp. - 10 - functionality limits that are expected to be addressed in the near future. The size of the broadband pipeline beyond 1.5 Mbps is important, but only because it is required for consumer cable TV, which is "where the money is" in broadband these days. Recall that the UTi report predicted 34 percent of potential residential customers would sign up for TV while only 13.1 percent would sign up for high-speed data and 7.5 percent for telephone service. Most of the revenue for the FTTH utility would come from cable TV subscribers, not Internet users. This is why cable companies have a distinct advantage in the current marketplace—they can devote just 10 percent of their cables to Internet services and the rest to TV—and why telephone companies are negotiating partnerships and marketing deals with satellite TV companies (e.g., SBC and EchoStar. BellSouth and Verizon with DirecTV) and investing billions in fiber -coaxial hybrid networks27 and increasing the capacity of their DSL services. WiMax, right now at least, looks like a weak competitor in the telecommunications world because of its limited capacity to broadcast television, but it could become the "killer app- in providing low-cost Internet access and Internet telephone service. A i -I"1 H platfonn can provide TV, telephony, and Internet services through a single pipe. But as the many competing providers of various broadband services described above make apparent. this capacity. is not necessary for a business plan to succeed. The absence of competitors offering FTTH demonstrates just the opposite fact, that a FTTH plan is not currently competitive because of its high capital and maintenance costs. It is not meaningful to say, as one panelist did at a July 7 rally by municipal broadband advocates in the Tri -Cities. that "DSL is an intermediate technology, everyone knows this.'48 All broadband technologies are "intermediate" technologies. in the sense that they are rapidly evolving and likely to be displaced sometime in the future. This applies to fiber-optic networks no less than to DSL. Indeed. because DSL is so much less expensive to install and has improved in speed so rapidly in just the past two years, the case can he made that fiber optic is more vulnerable than DSL to competition from wireless and other emerging broadband platforms. Consumers currently receive telecommunications services from separate providers using competing platforms. This is partly a legacy of regulatory policies that treat service providers differently based on the technology they use, but it is also the result of marketplace realities. Consumer needs and willingness to pay vary. and investors and entrepreneurs apparently believe All of these FTTH alternatives can deliver high-speed Internet services and telephony, which require downstream speeds of about 1.5 Mbps. 2i Almar Latour, Andy Pasztor, and Peter Grant, "SBC, EchoStar Plot Online Movie Venture," The Wall Street Journal, August 19, 2004: SBC Communications, supra note 20. 28 Jim Bailer, principal with Baller, Herbst Law Group, speaking at "Why Municipal Broadband is Good for the Tri -Cities." July 7. 2004. hosted by Fiber for Our Future at the Batavia Town Hall. The presentation was recorded and is available at www.tricitiesbroadband.com most consumers today are unwilling to pay a high enough price to recover the cost of financing, installing, and maintaining the FTTH platform. Virtually every home now has a land -wire telephone line and a cable connection, and most also have one or more wireless telephones and handheld devices. Nearly 80 percent of people living in the U.S. have a choice of five or more wireless companies competing for their business 29 Many now also have a satellite dish for digital TV or high-speed Internet access. How many families or business owners would be willing to pay to have yet another line run to their premises to offer services that differ little from what they are already getting? And what is the "social benefit" of having local governments provide that additional line? Price of FTTH alternatives Advocates of municipal broadband networks claim the existence of a government -run utility will force private companies to improve their services and lower their prices. But this assumes a lack of competition currently allows prices to be higher than necessary, and it further assumes the goverrvnent-nun utility would be able to set its own prices low enough to be competitive. The UTI proposal projects monthly rates for cable TV, telephone, etc. based on estimates of market penetration, cost of content. maintenance expenses, cost of retiring debt, and apparently the rates charged by private competitors. The projected rates are necessarily speculative and, as will be shown below, are probably too low to make the utility financially self-supporting. This is especially worrisome because the price of FI "1H alternatives is low and falling fast. As this was written (October 11, 2004), Comcast's Web site was offering cable modem service for the "first 6 months for $19.99/month; FREE Modem, $50 Cash Back Rebate, No Contract!" SBC now offers DSL "Express" service with downstream speeds of 384 Kbps - 1.5 Mbps and upstream speed of 128 Kbps for $26.95/month. "Pro' service has downstream speeds of 1.5 Mbps - 3.0 Mbps and upstream speed of 384 Kbps and costs $36.99/month. For a static IP address (necessary for VOIP). add $38.00/month to each price.' As this was written (October 11. 2004), Comcast's Web site was offering cable modem service for the "first 6 months for $19.99/month, FREE Modem, $50 Cash Back Rebate. No Contract!" Maximum downstream speed is 3.0 Mbps. The standard non -sale price in the Tri - Cities appears to be $42.95 per month. 29 Sonia Arrison, "Something Happened on the Way to Wireless Broadband." TechNewsWorld, May 21, 2004. 35 http://www05.sbc.com/DSL_new/content/1„18,00.html?SRC=http%3A%2F%2Fsw51 - 1 2 - SBC offers T-1 line service supporting data rates of 1.544 Mbps in Illinois for between $112.50 and $291.00 per month. depending on area and length of contract. If the T-1 crosses wire center boundaries. a channel mileage charge of between $13.84 and $25.00 per month per mile and a channel mileage termination charge of between S24.80 and $82.00 apply.31 Woodstock - based Other World Computing advertises T-1 for "as low as $399/month.» In the 2002 edition of this report. the advertised price for T-1 was $700/month. DirecWay, part of the DirecTV Group, offers satellite broadband service in the Tri -Cities area with downstream speed of 500 Kbps and upload speed of 75 Kbps for a $49.99 set-up fee and then $99/month (Horne Plan) or $129/month (Professional Plan, Static IP) for 15 months. After 15 months you own the equipment and the cost of service falls to $59/month (Home Plan) or $89/month (Professional Plan). DirecWay also has a commercial plan with downstream speed averaging 1 Mbps and upload speed of 100 Kbps for $99/month (Static IP, 5 email boxes) or $129/month (Static IP, 10 email boxes).33 Woodstock -based Other World Computing offers a satellite dish, installation. receiver card for a computer. five email accounts, and technical support for high- speed Internet access for between $29.95 and $149.95 a month.34 Back in 2002. when MCC Technology/Data Moving Company was wiring South Elgin for MDS. it said rates were expected to range from $69.95 to $149/month. In October 2004. according to the company's Web site, actual rates range from S39.99 to $99.99.35 As these prices suggest, competition and falling prices, not monopoly, are the rule in the broadband industry in the Tri -Cities. When WiMax comes to the Tri -Cities, it too is likely to be inexpensive. Clearwire, a business recently acquired by cellular phone pioneer and billionaire Craig McCaw, expects to offer a "WiMax-like service" in as many as 40 cities in 2005. McCaw has said he expects to charge $25 a month for broadband and $40 to $50 for a package that includes unlimited telephone service 36 As these prices suggest. competition and falling prices. not monopoly, are the rule in the broadband industry in the Tri -Cities. The evidence is clear that broadband prices in the Tri -Cities area are modest and falling. 3t DSI Service prices as reported in SBC Tariff issued June 6, 2003, III. C.C. No. 19, Part 15, Section 3. 32 http://www.owc.net/broadband.html 33 http://www.direcway.bz/pages/11/index.htm 34 S.A. Mawhorr, "Satellite Dish Speeds Up Internet Connection." Daily Herald, August 26, 2002. 35 http://www.datamoco.com/b_pricing.htm 3E Paul Davidson, supra note 17 - 1 3 - The same is true nationwide and has been true since the beginning of the industry. According to an FCC rulemaking in 2001, "The record before us, which shows a continuing increase in consumer broadband choices within and among the various delivery technologies—xDSL, cable modems, satellite, fixed wireless, and mobile wireless—suggests that no group of firms or technology will likely be able to dominate the provision of broadband services.'97 The FCC, so often wrong in the way it has chosen to interpret the 1996 Telecom Act and regulate the telecommunications industry, was right that time. Conclusion Not all of the broadband platforms described above are as fast or reliable as the fiber -to -the - home network envisioned by advocates ofa municipally owned broadband network. and some may cost more than a typical small business owner wants to spend. But they are widely available now to residents and businesses in the Tri -Cities at affordable prices. often for much less than they cost two years ago. More choices and even lower prices lay ahead as Comcast. SBC. and their competitors expand their offerings and technology continues to evolve. Advocates of municipal broadband say being without a state-of-the-art broadband platform places the economies of small cities and rural communities at great risk. justification for taking on the expense and risk involved broadband network. Why. then, should the city invest now in an expensive FTTH infrastructure? One can guess that the purpose is to subsidize a small number of community residents and businesses who want the highest quality broadband services but aren't willing to pay the full price for them. As the discussion below shows, this indeed is the only plausible in building a municipally owned 4. Broadband and economic development Advocates of municipal broadband say being without a state-of-the-art broadband platform places the economies of small cities and rural communities at great risk. Access to broadband is an important consideration to high-tech businesses choosing to relocate or expand, they say, and to high-tech workers looking to telecommute. In 2002, Peter Collins. Geneva's infomiation systems supervisor. wrote in a letter to the editor ofa local newspaper. "The Kane County Economic Development Board commissioned a Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, and 25 of the Commission's Rules to Establish Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Service and Fixed Satellite Services, 15 FCC Rcd 11,857, at 1119 (2001), cited by testimony of Thomas Tauke, senior vice president, Verizon Communications, on the Internet Freedom and Broadband Deployment Act of 2001 before the House Energy and Commerce Committee. April 25, 2001. http://newscenter.venzon.com/policy/broadband/ - 14 - study to assess telecommunications assets throughout the county. That study ... to no one's surprise, found a lack of affordable telecommunications assets and in fact encouraged what the Tri -Cities are trying to accomplish.'A8 The claim that a municipal FTTH network would be a boon for economic development efforts remains at the center of Fiber for Our Future's campaign. What evidence do the advocates present to support their claim? A report that appears on Batavia's Web site, edited by John Garvey for Convergence Research, Inc., says: As medium and smaller sized municipalities struggle to compete with large cities, and as metropolitan suburbs compete with the city core, access to broadband is increasingly necessary to retain current businesses and attract new start-ups. Lack of high-speed Internet access—a reality and a dilemma in rural communities and in outlying suburban areas—contributes to the difficulty municipalities have in recruiting engineering firms, software houses and other businesses that rely on broadband access.39 Typical of other research papers making similar claims. Garvey's report presents no data or proof of a link between broadband and economic growth. Moreover, there is a conflict of interest that is also commonplace in the pro -municipalization literature: Convergence Research, Inc. is a consulting firm that specializes in advocating municipalization and makes money by acting "as the primary operator offering reliable cable and telephone communication services to residents over this publicly owned network.' ° The for- profit firm, which operates out of a post office box in Geneva, apparently has produced just one publication. the "white paper" advocating municipalization. Advice on economic development from consulting firms. whether from Garvey's fine or the one used by the Kane County Economic Development Board, should be steeply discounted. Virtually all such firms tell their clients what they want to hear: That they can become high- growth areas for high-tech companies by investing. or investing more. in subsidies to new businesses. Today it's telecommunications infrastructure: yesterday it was workforce training and free land. Typical of other research papers making similar claims, Garvey's report presents no data or proof of a link between broadband and economic growth. A decade ago. SRI International made millions of dollars by convincing scores, perhaps hundreds. of communities that they could become "the next Silicon Valley' by dangling Peter Collins. "Underserved in Internet." letter to the editor, The Kane County Chronicle, June 29, 2002. John Garvey, "Municipal Broadband Networks: Unleashing the Power of the Internet," Convergence Research. Inc., March 2002, p. 4. `= Convergence Research. Inc.'s Web site. htlp://www.c-r-inc.com/ subsidies in front of corporate CEOs. Today, McKinsey & Company is doing the same thing, producing in 2001 a report for the City of Chicago titled "A New Economy Growth Strategy for Chicagoland." Econometric research consistently finds subsidies to corporations—whether in the form of cheap access to broadband. skilled labor, or land—are an unreliable and often counterproductive strategy for economic development. In fact. econometric research consistently finds subsidies to corporations—whether in the form of cheap access to land, sewers, or broadband—are an unreliable and often counterproductive strategy for economic development. Cities and states that make these expenditures do not create jobs or increase personal income at higher rates than cities and states that don't.' Edwin Mills, professor emeritus of real estate at Northwestern University and one of the country's leading urban economists, recently wrote about Chicago's aspirations to attract high-tech firms: By any reasonable definition, high-technology research, development. and manufacturing are the most footloose of industrial sectors. By and large, they locate where their highly educated and high -paid employees want to live. Mostly that is not adjacent to inner-city universities—a fact many local governments have learned at some cost to them. High-tech activities tend to locate in distant suburbs of metropolitan areas with fine universities (Route 128, Silicon Valley, Research Triangle Park). Almost no high-tech concentrations have been mainly the result of government planning. (Research Triangle Park is a partial exception.) More often, governments have jumped on the wagon after the band has been formed and most employment growth has finished.42 Because the vast majority of residents of most communities are now well -served by private broadband providers, a municipal broadband network would benefit only a small number of high-end users of broadband services. It is hardly surprising that these potential beneficiaries would organize and lobby for such a subsidy. But this is no reason why voters and taxpayers should support their scheme. The expected private benefits of a few users do not justify the cost of connecting every business and household in the community with expensive fiber-optic lines. 41 Samuel R. Staley and ,Michael LaFaive, "State Economic Development: Feeding Sparrows Through A Horse," ALEC Policy Forum, American Legislative Exchange Council, September 1, 2002; Amy K. Frantz, "Markets, Not Government, Should Determine Economic Winners," Institute Brief, Public Interest Institute at Iowa Wesleyan College, November 1, 2002; Peter S. Fisher and Alan H. Peters, "Tax and Spending Incentives and Enterprise Zones," New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. March/April 1997; Timothy J. Bartik, Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies? (Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute, 1991). 42 Edwin S. Mills. "Dreams, Plans & Reality: A Critique of Chicago Metropolis 2020." Heartland Policy Study No. 97, February 2002. - 1 6 - 5. Public versus private provision: efficiency considerations Another claim commonly made by advocates of municipalization is that public utilities operate more efficiently than private companies. Kathryn Grondin, a writer for the Daily Herald, believes a municipally owned broadband network would benefit consumers because "without shareholders to satisfy, savings can go to the customer."43 James Volk, speaking for members of his pro -municipalization group, told a reporter, "We are looking at it as a business and will make business decisions on whether we go forward." 44 Would a municipally owned broadband network really be more efficient than any of the competing private broadband services in existence now or coming on the scene? More broadly, can elected officials and public employees run a government enterprise as efficiently as a business? Answers to this question often are motivated by ideology (conservatives tend to say no;' liberals tend to say yes) or based on a few favorite anecdotes. What do the data say? Research on the costs and quality of public services produced via municipal ownership versus private provision is extensive and conclusive:* Activities and services that have moved from public to private provision since 1980 include such sophisticated enterprises as multi -billion - dollar insurance funds, airports, hospitals. ports and harbors. prisons, railroads, and water works. They also include parks, golf courses, sports stadiums and arenas, police and fire services, and 'building maintenance. Often the switch is attributable to complaints of high costs and poor service, making continued reliance on the public sector a liability for elected officials. The research shows privatization, not municipalization. delivers significant cost savings, A comprehensive survey of more than 100 independent studies of privatizations in a wide variety of fields ... found cost reductions of between 20 and 50 percent. 43 Kathryn Grondin, "St. Charles to Survey Businesses on Need for Fiber Optic Network," Daily Herald, October 14, 2000. 44 Tona Kunz, "Why Officials From Tri -Cities Visited a Small Town in Iowa," Daily Herald, January 17, 2002. Geoffrey Segal, editor, Annual Privatization Report 2004, 18th Edition (Los Angeles, CA: Reason Foundation, 2004), htp://www.rppi.org/apr2004/anpr2004.pdf; William D. Eggers and John O'Leary, Revolution at the Roots: Making Our Government Smaller, Better. and Closer to Home (New York, NY: Free Press, 1995); General Accounting Office, Privatization: Lessons Learned by State and Local Governments (Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office, 1997); Robert Poole, Cutting Back City Hall (New York, NY: Universe Books, 1980); Carl F. Valente and Lydia D. Manchester, Rethinking Local Services: Examining Alternative.Delivery Approaches, Management Information Service Special Report No. 12 (Washington, DC: International City Management Association. 1994); Charles Wolf Jr., Markets or Governments: Choosing Between Imperfect Alternatives (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1988): E.S. Savas. Privatizing the Public Sector (Chatham. NJ: Chatham House Publishers, Inc.. 1982); E.S. Savas, Privatization and Public -Private Partnerships (New York: NY: Chatham House Publishers, 2000). - 17 - greater accountability and responsiveness to consumers or elected officials, and a level of quality equivalent or superior to public -sector delivery. A comprehensive survey of more than 100 independent studies of privatizations in a wide variety of fields, conducted by John Hilke for the Reason Foundation, found cost reductions of between 20 and 50 percent.' Other surveys have documented average savings in the same range 47 E.S. Savas, Barbara Stevens, and other experts identify, less bureaucracy and higher worker productivity attributable to better supervision. less paid time off. and superior equipment as the reasons why private -sector fines are typically able to produce higher -quality goods and services at a lower cost than government agencies48 Those factors are more common in the private sector because firms must compete to produce higher quality and lower costs or they lose business to more efficient competitors. Because they do not need to compete to survive, government agencies can remain indifferent to these considerations. By this reasoning, towns should begin manufacturing cars and trucks because they own roads, or perhaps own and operate restaurants and bars because they own sidewalks. Unlike most cities. the Tri -Cities own and operate their own electric utilities. This means they have personnel and assets that could be used to reduce the cost and risk associated with building and maintaining a municipally owned broadband system. Peter Collins summarized the possibilities in 2002: The tri -cities, unlike most communities. own their electric utilities. The rights-of-way and the poles are owned and maintained by the cities themselves. We can build and run our own facilities much easier than towns without such an infrastructure. And if you're building facilities to serve Internet and data services to residents and businesses, you might as well offer cable and telephone services also. It's an economy of scale49 By this reasoning, towns should begin manufacturing cars and trucks because they own roads, or perhaps own and operate restaurants and bars because they own sidewalks. This "comparative advantage" comes only from denying equal access to these public goods to private competitors who should be assumed to be better equipped to manufacture a good or provide a service than is 'John Hilke, Cost Savings from Privatization: A Compilation of Study Findings (Los Angeles, CA: Reason Foundation, 1993). 47 James T. Bennett and Manuel H. Johnson, Better Government at Half the Price (Ottawa, IL: Caroline House Publishers, Inc., 1981); T.E. Borcherding, ed., Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1977); E.S. Savas. Privatization and Public- Pnvate Partnerships, supra note 45. Chapter 6. 48 E.S. Savas, supra note 45; Barbara Stevens. Delivering Municipal Services Efficiently: A Comparison of Municipal and Private Service Delivery (New York, NY: Ecodata, Inc., 1984), pp. 15ff. 49 Peter Collins, supra note 38. - 18 - the municipality. Giving government-owned utilities tax and regulatory advantages over private companies distorts the marketplace and discourages private companies from investing in the region. As Jeffrey Eisenach, in a 2001 report on government-owned telecommunications utilities, observes: As a result of this basket of subsidies and other advantages, most of them hidden from view and difficult or impossible to quantify, the one thing public utilities never do is provide an accurate gauge of the true costs of providing any service. Instead, because these hidden subsidies permit public utilities to undercut the prices charged by private competitors, they distort the marketplace, deter entry by real competitors. and thus prevent the marketplace from setting cost -based prices.' Tri -Cities officials seem uncertain about whether the new utility would have to comply with the same rules as apply to private cable and telephone companies. A 2003 memorandum on one of the community's Web sites says "the new utility would probably be subject to franchise fees and taxes like the incumbents.' But how can city officials present detailed price estimates for cable TV, telephone, and broadband services —as they do on their Web sites—without knowing if the utility would have to pay these fees and taxes? Tri -Cities officials seem uncertain about whether the new utility would have to comply with the same rules as apply to private cable and telephone companies. The claim that municipalization is more efficient than relying on private companies fails on empirical grounds. In the next section we will review the experiences of other cities that have attempted to get into the cable and broadband businesses. 6. Experiences of other cities Offering telephone, cable, and Internet services is far more complex and difficult than collecting trash or cleaning parks. Telephone service requires switching equipment. secure facilities, backup power generation, and a trained staff of customer service agents. Customers don't simply sign up on their own: Advertising campaigns must be managed, billing systems and debt collection procedures put in place, and prices set and revised competitively. Not surprisingly, then, few communities attempt to do it: Of some 55.000 towns and municipalities in the U.S.. about 200 Jeffrey Eisenach, "Does Government Belong in the Telecom Business?' Progress on Point, The Progress and Freedom Foundation, January 2001, p. 15. From "Further questions regarding the feasibility study and project and answers from the broadband Consultant (1-9-03)," in a memorandum by Bill McGrath, city manager. to Jim Volk, telecommunications chair, posted on the City of Batavia Web site on January 9, 2003. -19- operate municipal broadband networks, for a penetration rate of about 0.5 percent.' Even cable by itself is surprisingly difficult to provide. Small cable firms many of them many times larger than what the Tri -Cities is envisioning—have gone out of business because they couldn't negotiate terms with content providers as favorable as those given to such giants as Comcast. Marketing. maintenance, and service calls are all labor-intensive and expensive. Eisenach provides the following summary of research by Ronald Rizzuto and Michael Wirth at the University of Denver on municipal cable systems in four small cities: The study concluded that the first three systems "have been poor investments from a pure business perspective" and the fourth (Cedar Falls), though too new for a conclusive evaluation, "has a large financial deficit to overcome in order to become profitable." Indeed, the study concluded that the three systems that had been in operation long enough to permit a conclusion had cumulative losses of $6.6 million and that "the Glasgow and Paragould investments will never reach payback, and it will take Negaunee 23 years to pay back its initial investment.' Building and operating a broadband infrastructure is much more expensive and risky than managing a cable system. Rizzuto and Wirth. according to Eisenach. found "Glasgow's cable system loses money even after the benefits of lower cable rates for Glasgow residents are taken into account," and they refer to the consumer benefits of lower cable rates as "an illusion because, as noted earlier, the municipal cable system is not self-sustaining.'' Building and operating a broadband infrastructure is much more expensive and risky than managing a cable system. Spencer, Iowa. population 11,000, spent $17 million to create its fiber- optic network and run coaxial cable to 4,500 homes. This is $1.545 per resident and $3,777 per household,55 close to the construction cost estimate of $3.539 per customer that appeared in the UTI report for the Tri -Cities. Communities in Utah, Wisconsin, and Washington have 52McGarty and Bhagavan, supra note 11, p. 3. 53 Jeffrey Eisenach, supra note 50; pp. 12-13. The original study is Ronald J. Rizzuto and Michael O. Wirth, Costs. Benefits: and Long -Term Sustainability of Municipal Cable Television Overbuilds (Deriver, CO: GSA Press, 1998). u Ibid., p. 14. ss Spencer's municipal utility had reserve funds sufficient to loan the new entity $8 million and to spend $8 million itself on the fiber network, which it owns. The new entity leases the fiber from the utility. James Volk and Randy Recklaus, "Re: Tri -City Broadband - Spencer Iowa Site Visit." memorandum on the Batavia Web site dated January 22, 2001. - 20 - collectively built or are about to build F1"1 H networks 56 Other communities are considering municipal WiMax networks.57 Spencer expected (and still expects) to "break even" on its investment by charging residents and businesses for telecommunications services, but many communities that have taken the plunge have not. Most operate at a loss, forcing ratepayers for other utilities or local taxpayers to pay more to pick up the losses. For example: # Iowa Communications Network "consistently requires large subsidies to continue in business. For the fiscal year ending in June 1999, for example, the system lost $24.5 million on an operating budget of $53.3 million. Even after subsidies of over $23 million, it sustained a net loss of over $5.8 million.'�6 # California 's CALNET system. designed to connect state agencies and other public entities, was some $20 million in debt when it was privatized in 199859 # Marietta, Georgia lost more than $35 million operating "FiberNet," a 210 - mile fiber-optic system with some 200 paying customers that it launched in 1996. It finally sold the system to American Fiber Systems in September 2004 for about $8 million. "a fraction of what FiberNet has cost the city in losses.'" Marietta Mayor Bill Dunaway told the Atlanta Journal -Constitution the town could no longer afford to make equipment upgrades to keep the network competitive. "That's why we should not be in this business—you have to keep reinvesting. It's negative cash flow once you consider reinvestment of capital.' "That's why we should not be in this business—you have to keep reinvesting. It's negative cash flow once you consider reinvestment of capital." — Bill Dunaway. Mayor Marietta. Georgia # Lebanon. Ohio originally projected its cost at $5 million and ended up spending $9 million. In May 2001. the city increased electric rates to cover broadband losses and authorized John Wohlstetter, "Municipal Networks: Raising Taxes Beats Raising Rates," Competitive Enterprise Institute, January 14, 2004. 5' David Caruso. "Philly Considers Wireless Internet for All," Associated Press, September 1, 2004. Jeffrey Eisenach, supra note 50, p. 14. 59 Ibid. w Robin Yamakawa. "Price Holds at $11.2M for Company," Marietta Daily Journal, September 1, 2004. Brenden Sager. "Marietta to Lose Millions in Sale of Web Service." Atlanta Journal -Constitution, July 29. 2004. -21- $14.8 million in mortgage revenue bonds to cover operating losses62 Lebanon then passed a law requiring all new homes and offices to connect to the municipal broadband network and requiring competitors to purchase broadband capacity from the municipality and pay the city $1,250 to $2,000 for every customer they sign up.63 The town is now being sued by Time - Warner and developers. The Tacoma, Washington Power Utility launched it's Click! Network in 1997. By 2000 it had lost $15.7 million. Projections of cost, time to construct, number of customers, earnings, and net profit were all overly optimistic. # The Tacoma, Washington Power Utility launched it's Click! Network in 1997. By 2000 it had lost $15.7 million. "Combined with the $86.5 million in capital expenses already dedicated, the system has spent a total of $105 million since its inception. As a public entity. TPU must cover its losses with revenue from ratepaying electricity customers. So far TPU's cable system losses have added about $709 in new costs for each of the utility's 148,000 power customers.' Projections of cost, time to construct, number of customers, earnings, and net profit were all overly optimistic. "At present it does not appear that the Click! Network can become profitable within the foreseeable future.' In an October 2001 report published by the Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University, economist David Tuerck and colleagues present case studies of "five communities that have had a disappointing experience with the cable/Internet business," including Tacoma. Washington and Lebanon, Ohio, mentioned above.66 The following excerpt from the executive summary of their report presents their findings: # "Tacoma, Washington has failed to break even after building its Click! Network. Costs have exceeded expectations, and the city has had to increase electric rates in order to cover its cable/Internet losses. # "Paragould. Arkansas is losing money and may have to increase property taxes in order to pay off bonds floated to shore up its faltering cable business. 62 David Tuerck et al., "Cashing in on Cable: Warning Flags for Local Government," BHI Policy Study, Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University, October 2001. 63 Ben Charny, "Time Warner Broadband Suit Advances," CNET News.com, September 2, 2004. Paul Guppy, "When Government Enters the Telecommunications Market,' Policy Brief, Washington Institute Foundation, June 2001. 65 Ibid. David Tuerck et al., supra note 62. # "Ashland, Oregon attempted to diversify and expand its electric department's customer base by entering the cable/lntemet business. It has had trouble attracting customers. however, because of unanticipated price competition from the incumbent private -sector cable provider. # "Lebanon, Ohio built its own cable system to provide residents with lower rates. Now, sinking into debt and suffering financial losses. Lebanon has raised its own rates and finds itself up against stiff competition from the incumbent provider. # "Scottsboro. Alabama also went into the cable business to offer lower rates. Then, when it experienced unexpected price competition, it went to court to prevent its competitor from cutting its rates." In March 2004. Tuerck and the Beacon Hill institute revisited the issue in another report.' This time they found a proposed municipal broadband network for Concord. Massachusetts stood a 60 percent probability of losing money. with an expected loss of some $542,000. The authors also updated their reports on other cities, presenting as "cautionary tales" the experiences of Tacoma, Washington; Ashland, Oregon; Lebanon, Ohio; and Braintree, Massachusetts. All were having difficulty facing new competition from private broadband providers. The point should be clear: Experiences in other cities reveal that municipal broadband utilities often fail. Besides all of the examples cited above, newspaper articles easily found on the Internet report similar financial troubles facing municipal broadband and cable networks in many other towns and cities. including such places as Forsyth, Georgia; Glasgow, Kentucky; Morganton, North Carolina; Negaunee. Michigan; and Trion, Georgia. The point should be clear: Experiences in other cities reveal that municipal broadband utilities often fail. 7. Why municipal broadband is so risky Why have so many municipalities experienced financial problems with their municipal broadband networks. forcing them to raise prices. cross -subsidize their consumers. suspend expansion plans. or even sell the networks at huge losses to private companies? The obvious answer is that telecommunications is a risky business. Adopting a financing scheme that relies on private investors. while a proper move. is probably insufficient to genuinely protect taxpayers and ratepayers. E; David Tuerck and John Barrett, "Municipal Broadband in Concord: An In -Depth Analysis,' BHI Policy Study. Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University, March 2004. -2;- Risk factors The frequent failure of municipal broadband utilities must partly be due to the fact that operating an integrated telecommunications business is not one of the "core competencies' of elected officials or the administrators they hire. But there are other reasons as well. Seven risk factors are most clearly evident: Many communities that experienced financial losses from their municipal broadband systems did so because construction costs were higher than original estimates. # Cost of construction: FTTH is the most expensive way to deliver broadband service, which immediately makes it the most vulnerable platform in the fiercely competitive broadband industry. Other competitors either spend very little on infrastructure or already have it in place and paid for, making it a "sunk cost," whereas the FTTH utility must charge prices high enough to include debt repayment. Many communities that experienced financial losses from their municipal broadband systems did so because construction costs were higher than original estimates. # Time to construct: 1t takes between one and two years to build a FTTH network, during which time the utility is spending money but not earning revenues. United Telesystems Inc. apparently told Tri -Cities officials, "We have seen clients get their systems launched within 7 to 8 months from when they have closed on their bond issues, however, it typically takes 10 to 12 months.'s8 But during the July 7 rally, Aggregate Networks' cofounder and principal Rick Kaufmann twice referred to "two years" of construction with "no revenue" coming in to the utility. This was one reason, he said, why investors view municipal broadband networks as start-up ventures and so demand higher interest rates. # Legal restrictions on subsidization: The municipal entity cannot be subsidized without triggering legal challenges under Section 253 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act.69 Cities that have tried to subsidize their municipal broadband networks by raising rates for other utilities or forcing residents and businesses to use the municipal service have been taken to court. if the municipal utility begins to lose money and cannot make its loan payments. the only legal route is sale of the assets to a private firm. either prior to or following bankruptcy. Taxpayers and ratepayers in towns and cities across the country have lost millions of dollars when this has occurred. 66 From "Further questions regarding the feasibility study and project and answers from the broadband Consultant (1-9-03)." supra note 51. 69 47 U.S.C. §253(a). "In General—No State or local statute or regulation or other State or local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service.' -24- # Questionable penetration rates: Many municipalities that suffered losses from their broadband ventures received from their consultants inflated estimates of the number of potential customers who would sign up for services. There are obvious incentives for consultants to inflate those numbers while simultaneously under -estimating construction cost and time. A good example is the telephone survey supposedly showing latent demand for broadband services in the Tri -Cities. "A total of 300 completed calls (100 for each cities) were randomly made to residents of Batavia. Geneva. and St. Charles and 50 to businesses. Of the business calls. one city had 16 completed business calls and the other two had 17." 70 On its face this is too small a sample to determine if there is sufficient consumer support for a service costing $57 million - $62 million just to launch. As mentioned earlier, consumers currently use the bulk of bandwidth for cable TV, not for faster Internet access. FTTH may make 100 Mbps available for interactive video, high-speed computing, or voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) applications. and a few businesses may use the network this way, but the vast majority of potential customers would be satisfied with standard Internet access at 1.5 Mbps and the rest of the bandwidth devoted to consumer cable TV. if they already receive cable TV from another source, then getting Internet access from the cable company, telephone company, or a wireless company will probably be cheaper and no less convenient than switching to the FTTH network. This makes the high penetration rates predicted by the Tri -Cities' consultants highly unlikely. # Finding content consumers iawill pay for: Focusing on how many bits per second a technology can deliver is misleading because bandwidth is only one part ofa successful business plan. More important is the ability to create, market, and deliver the applications consumers want. Big cable and telephone companies are able to negotiate deals with well-known content providers—for example. DirecTV has an exclusive pay-per-view "Sunday Ticket` deal with the NFL, and AT&T has partnered with Comcast. Cox, and Time Warner to deliver Vo1P service. Aggregate Networks LLC and consulting firms like it have few contacts and little expertise in arranging for content. # Technological change: New technologies such as \\Wax and VoIP present a fundamental challenge to all business plans in the telecommunications sector, whether private or public. Businesses must be prepared to sell or abandon facilities and operations that have become obsolete. and the quicker they can make the decision and act on it. the better off their investors and consumers will be. Municipalities are unlikel\ to be able to act as quickly as private firms. creating the specter of taxpayers or ratepa\ers being forced to subsidize obsolete services for several years after superior alternatives become available. Aggregate Networks LLC and consulting firms like it, however, have few contacts and little expertise in arranging for content. i0 From "Further questions regarding the feasibility study and project and answers from the broadband Consultant (1-9-03)," supra note 51. - 25 - An example of an emerging technology not already mentioned in this report is broadband over power line (BPL), which allows Internet access over household electricity lines." Such technology would allow Internet service providers to reach every house and business using the existing power grid. Even if BPL is capable of operating only at relatively slow speeds, as may be the case, it could still provide the remote metering function advocates of FTTH claim as one of its benefits.72 On October 14. the FCC approved rules expected to boost the spread of BPL nationwide.73 Many of the consulting firms in this business are start-ups with few clients and assets of their own. It is unlikely they will still be around to take the blame when a municipal broadband utility begins to cost taxpayers and ratepayers money. # Financial viability of partners: Municipal broadband networks rely heavily on consultants and contractors, making the financial viability of these partners crucial to the success of the business plans. But how viable are those partners? RCN, a major builder of municipal cable networks, announced plans to file for Chapter 11 in February 2004. According to David Tuerck_ "Other firms have suffered bankruptcies, buildout freezes and abandonments. These include Western Integrated Networks/WINFirst (bankrupt), Altrio (frozen). American Broadband (abandoned). Utilicom (frozen), and SNETamericast (abandoned).' Many of the consulting fines in this business are start-ups with few clients and assets of their own. It is unlikely they will still be around to take the blame when a municipal broadband utility begins to cost taxpayers and ratepayers money. Certificates of Participation Voters in the Tri -Cities rejected the municipal broadband initiative in 2003 in part because they believed their tax dollars were put at risk. Does the new plan, which relies on certificates of participation rather than general revenue bonds, deserve a second look from voters? 71 David LaGesse, Piggybacking on power lines," U.S. News & World Report, August 12, 2002, p. 51; Judith B. Warrick, "Are You Ready for the Revolution?" Global Electricity Strategy, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, April 12, 2001. 72 "We expect that [BPL] will be mainly used at home controlling and remote metering because it has the low speed of 1 Mbps or less and it will be rarely used at the field needing the high speed data transmission. However, if the limit on the power line frequency usage is solved, the high speed data communication will be possible. So it has the brightest promise than [sic] any other home networking technologies." Samsung Technical Support, on Samsung's Web site accessed on October 12, 2004. http://www.samsung.com/HomeNetwork/SupportServices/Technicalinfo/wired/PLC.htm 73 Ben Charny and Jim Hu, "FCC Eases High -Speed Network Rules," CNET News.com, October 14. 2004. David Tuerck and John Barrett, supra note 67. -26- According to Annie Collins, the new financing arrangement means "this will be no risk at all for the taxpayer.i75 The Fiber for Our Future Web site proclaims, "ZERO IMPACT ON YOUR TAXES GUARANTEED!" [all caps in original]76 It says "this year's referendum question will again ask for you to grant authority to the TriCities to build and operate a municipal fiber optic broadband utility in a manner which carries ZERO TAX RISK. [all caps in original] There are several possible financing methods available to the TriCities. \\'J1ile these methods may require a longer repayment period or a higher interest rate than last year's proposal, the utility will remain 100 percent independent of your tax dollars." [bold face in original] But Aggregate Networks hardly has the track record that should inspire such confidence. It is reportedly involved in just two other municipal FTTH projects—Truckee Donner Public Utility District in California and Crawfordsville Electric Light & Power in Indianapolis—and it has yet to announce a financing package for either of its clients. Indeed, it appears no broadband network in the U.S. has ever been financed by certificates of participation. probably because investors view such projects as being too risky. In a market where broadband services are already ubiquitous and inexpensive, they are almost certainly correct. The use of certificates of participation may offer some protection to taxpayers that using revenue bonds does not, but there is a price to pay for that protection. Generally in such cases, ownership of the asset is held by the lender while the client—in this case the local governments—pays down the loan. This means the network will not be "community owned," but only leased by local governments from Aggregate Networks' investors. Those investors, in turn, are free to sell the network to other investors. In fact, Aggregate Networks' Rick Kaufmann, speaking at the July 7 rally in Batavia, said "we will sell it to Comcast if it doesn't work." Historically. certificates of participation emerged as a way for local governments to avoid caps and restrictions on their ability to raise taxes and issue revenue bonds. They are most effective where the economic value of the asset involved is readily assessed and likely to be stable. Municipal broadband networks do not fit this definition. The value of an expensive FTTH system is not determined by the cost of building it. but the ability of entrepreneurs to use it as part of a successful business plan. There is simply no precedent for that being done. Consequently, it is highly unlikely that Aggregate Networks or any other consulting firm will be able to arrange this kind of financing for municipal broadband utilities. Finally. it would be misleading to imply that arranging for private financing of the cons/ruction of the FTTH network means taxpayers and ratepayers won't later find themselves "on the hook' to pay for operating costs and upgrades to the system. One of the lessons from Aggregate Networks has yet to announce a financing package for either of its two FTTH municipal clients. Jan Ramming, supra note 10. www tricitybroadband.com. October 10, 2004. -27- • other cities that have tried to make municipal broadband networks work but failed is that operating costs per customer are often higher than expected, resulting in the need for annual subsidies. There is nothing in the Tri -Cities referenda that would protect taxpayers and ratepayers from having to pay more to keep the utility operating in the years ahead. Conclusion Two years ago, in the first edition of this report. I wrote: A municipal broadband network may start service by charging "competitive` or even below-market fees, but once full -spectrum (DSL, cable, and wireless) competition arrives, prices for access will fall to the cities' operating costs or less, leaving them unable to pay off the bonds issued to cover the up -front investment in fiber. Businesses and residents cannot be treated as captive customers and charged more than what competitors would charge, first because of the existence of technological alternatives to the fiber-optic network and second because municipalities are barred from subsidizing their public telecommunications enterprises. Bankruptcy is a likely scenario. Municipal broadband utilities clearly place taxpayers and ratepayers at substantial risk, regardless of how their construction is financed. Developments since October 2002 have largely supported this analysis. Private competitors have returned to the field following deregulation of cable and telephone companies. Prices for broadband services are being driven downward by strong competition. As unlikely as it was in 2002 that a broadband utility could have put together a viable business plan, it is even less likely today. Municipal broadband utilities clearly place taxpayers and ratepayers at substantial risk. regardless of how their construction is financed. Conclusion Generally speaking, municipal ownership of broadband networks is probably not in the best interests of residents and most businesses, even in communities not well served today by private providers. Access to broadband services is more plentiful than advocates of municipalization claim or admit. suggesting the real issue is not availability but price and who should pay it. The chief advantages of a municipal broadband network are that it would speed up access to high-quality broadband services by six months or a year and subsidize this access for the small number of businesses and individuals who most want it. It is unlikely' that more than a small number of residents would benefit from this speed-up. that their benefits would justify the steep cost. or that it is fair to force other residents and businesses to subsidize them. It is fanciful to imagine that municipal broadband is a cost-effecti \ e way to promote economic development. - 28 - Vere few other cities attempt to build and own broadband networks precisely because the costs and financial risks are too great. Cities that have taken the leap simply illustrate the riskiness of the venture, costing their taxpayers and ratepayers millions of dollars in subsidies with no end in sight. It is no secret or surprise that public provision of services tends to be Tess efficient in the long run than private provision. Telecommunications services—complex, ever-changing, and intensely competitive—are unlikely to be an exception to this rule. Claims that consumers would benefit because governments don't make profits, or that public officials can run government agencies "like businesses," simply aren't plausible in light of the record. Building and operating a }-1"I H network would be expensive and risky. Because of large economies of scale. the telecommunications industry is dominated by national and global companies. The Tri -Cities would be competing with giants such as Comcast and DirecTV and technologies that require Tess up -front investment than fiber optic. Comcast. SBC. and other competitors could easily cut their prices and thereby reduce the municipal entity's revenues. Bankruptcy of the municipal entity in a few years is a real possibility. Threatening to build a municipal broadband network may have been a good strategy two years ago to prompt AT&T and SBC to make good on past promises. Following through with municipalization, however, is probably not in the best interests of Tri -Cities residents or the business community. Cite officials would have to be prepared to quickly sell the network—at a Toss—once competition emerges. It appears to be inevitable that such competition will emerge. thanks in part to the removal of regulatory barriers by the FCC and the courts. Threatening to build a municipal broadband network may have been a good strategy two years ago. to prompt the incumbent cable and telephone companies to make good on past promises. Following through with municipalization, however. is probably not in the best interests of Tri -Cities residents or the business community. About the Author Joseph L. Bast is president and CEO of The Heartland Institute, a national nonprofit research center founded in 1984 and located in Chicago, Illinois. He is the coauthor of seven books, including Why We Spend Too Much on Health Care (1992), Eco -Sanity: A Common -Sense Guide to Environmentalism (1994), and Education & Capitalism (2003). His writing has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Investor's Business Daily, USA Today, Human Events, and many of the country's largest -circulation newspapers. Mr. Bast was the founding publisher of IT Update, a monthly newsletter on information technology and telecommunications regulation issues, and four monthly newspapers: School Reform News, Environment & Climate News, Health Care News, and Budget & Tax News. He has been recognized frequently for his contributions to public policy research and debate, including being named one of "The 88 to Watch in 1988" by the Chicago Tribune; recipient of the 1994 Roe Award from State Policy Network and of the 1996 Sir Antony Fisher International Memorial Award; and elected a member of the Philadelphia Society in 2002. He and his wife, Diane, reside in Palatine, a suburb of Chicago. About The Heartland Institute The Heartland Institute is an independent national nonprofit organization based in Chicago. Founded in 1984. it originally focused on Illinois issues. Over the years, Heartland evolved into a regional and now a national organization providing infonnation to the nation's 8.300 state and national elected officials. It has a full-time staff of 13 and a 2004 budget of about $2.1 million. Heartland operates PolicyBot, a Web -based clearinghouse for the work of some 350 think tanks and advocacy groups. Approximately 13,700 documents are available from the service for free. Heartland publishes four monthly newspapers and a monthly newsletter on telecommunications policy, as well as occasional books, policy studies, and shorter essay's. Some 425 elected officials serve on Heartland's Legislative Advisory Board, and 100 academics and economists serve on a Policy Advisory Board. Heartland welcomes your support as a Member or donor. Memberships start at _just $29 a year. and additional contributions are tax deductible. For more information. visit its Web site at www.heartland.org. call 312/377-4000. or write to The Heartland Institute. 19 South LaSalle. Suite 903_ Chicago. Illinois 60603. ©2004 The Heartland Institute Distributed by The Heartland Institute, a nonprofitand nonpartisan public policy research organization. Nothing in this report should be construed as reflectingtheviews ofThe Heartland Institute, nor as an attemptto aid or hinder the passage of legislation Additional copies of this study are available for $10 from The Heartland Institute.19South LaSalle Street#903,Ch cago,IL60603,phone 312/377-4000.tax 312/377- 5000: email think@heartland org Web http //www heartland.org AMY D/SPARTE 2044 Prospect Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA January 4, 2005 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90245 RECEIVED Per Honorable Mayor and Council Members; Attached is the petition I circulated supporting expansion of WiFi to my neighborhood. I petitioned 20th Pl, 20th St, and 21g St east of Prospect. I also petitioned my immediate neighbors on Prospect. My intent was to convince you that you should provide WiFi in our neighborhood by gathering many signatures without stirring emotions. It was very easy to gather signatures, everyone wants WiFi access, and most thought it had been approved for the entire City (and would be coming soon to our neighborhood.) However, passion is running high on this issue and I do not want to cause problems. Therefore, I decided to only solicit signatures in my immediate neighborhood, on a smaller scale than I originally planned. It should be noted that everyone I solicited, except one, signed my petition. When I told neighbors that only those in line of sight had access at this point and expansion Citywide was pending a cost review, it was upsetting to them. Many lived here in the 70's and remember `There is no life east of Sepulveda'. They are extremely sensitive to idea that the west side of our City has an opportunity we do not have. The general consensus up here was, 'What do you mean the west side has it and we don't? and 'How can they provide this service to some and not all?' I found myself explaining • your position that all have access if you are in line of sight. This explanation was unsatisfactory to most and I think it is weak. The point is to have a City sponsored high- speed internet provider in your home and realize the savings opportunity. If you must travel to line of sight, it is not the same. I have been a Flight Attendant for 26 years and traveled throughout the world. As a professional traveler you should know that I choose hotels, bars, and restaurants based on WiFi Availability and feel that this access would enhance all businesses in Hermosa Beach. I agree with Councilman Edgerton that cost to the City is an important consideration, however, he has been in municipal government long enough to have a clear understanding that this objection should have been presented at the beginning of this project. Putting the brakes on WiFi after it is available to only a small portion of residents is mismanagement. Additionally, it is difficult to predict the revenues a new application of technology will produce and I am confident that all Council Members were aware of the WiFi cost unpredictability in the initial stages of this project. It is unlikely that I will be present at your Jan 11th meeting, but if you happen to look out to your audience and see a uniformed Flight Attendant, that would be me with the good fortune to land at LAX on time and attend your meeting. If so, I will be happy to answer any questions you have about my petition or my position. Thank you for your time and attention to this forward thinking issue. E /.7eir-yz 2 a j9 7/7 x-x,s../ii6 to, Przospc,-- Ark The City of Hermosa Beach provides free access to the their WiFi Network for Residents who live within line -of -sight of one oftwo antennas. We would like WiFi access in our area. NAME 4z, ayt Y vPc 4 ,s71,o( k AA/ 61,t1/0(k) /444 y .81u6ho \414 -45a a-11( Lf ko6,50A) ADDRESS &OW tQrai- 1P e 2-D�(11©S/¢i L / ;133 Zv�� I'Z3 2 SI /2.7f s77C 1..�-ate Z(121 Shrec=, iG LID c- A 0 1-L1I-k(r) Qi Ave-. Pzosp figT:— do,141 PI- tjLZ if;4- Hg. eicz;3-(1 /If Cif :qC 1167 vri )7a ei sL. JIB t 6-fotri 4 1" . .__-• (rictr t-- • vt.0 Q_ •3 ( &U.? i'Vit (.• /...._- -----. t 11-- ;---; / /I/ e. 6I rz)A17/7 111) 2 .5 p 71 12_22-1- J-Ist six k-16 „/_-2s-s-- 2/ 7-7 4- / 1 LOT 7,203 S.F. TRACT NO. 060189 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, IN BLOCK 41, OF THE FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1 PAGES 59 AND 60 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES OWNER'S STATEMENT WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF OR ARE INTERESTED IN THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND WE CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. 30 HERMOSA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA,O���LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY /" - )rLP--%;*-*L I - R. Gl��"t[/iOWNE� 031 -RAO )t Ziht&s ' iii Ati40+66'7r MSYM CA_ THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR UNITS, WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF (,3 ' A ,6 d --E7 ) ON °VA VEfrt 41) '140o}cr BEFORE ME, cat"( �5► *' � 1� +�l �1, A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED ScLtirrat, / V q* .4 /AP /4 r o,m PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO' ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) kS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT 14E/SIIC/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN kIIS-/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES) AND THAT BY +1IS/H€IR/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND: NAME: 'Aew V / PRINT NAME OF NOTARY ESS/ -J. R mo. 30826 03-31-06 r MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS NOTARY PUIW IN AND IS IN L COUNTY FOR SAID STATE MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SE/ /!' 4'O("' ENGINEER'S STATEMENT: +� JAN 0 6 'nni COM. DEV. DEPT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF JAY R. 5C1-IOS1E2 ON 04-14-04. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, THAT THE MONUMENTS OF THE CHARACTER AND LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN PLACE (OR WILL BE IN PLACE WITHIN TWENTY FOUR MONTHS FROM THE FILING DATE OF THIS MAP); THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. GARY J. ROEHL / R.C.E. 30826 EXPIRATION: 03-31-06 BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE BEARING N 12'10'00" W OF THE SIDELINE OF HERMOSA AVENUE AS SHOWN ON FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, M.B. 1-59-60. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. DONALD L. WOLFE CITY ENGINEER �No-ne�wr-tc DEPUTY R.C.E. ozoz73 CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE EXPIRES 7-30 -o, /?,5 LI - DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE DAY OF , 20_ APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 20___. SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE THE SIGNATURE OF WARREN GILLELEN, EASEMENT HOLDER, AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617, PAGE 47, OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, HAS BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436(a)(3)(A)(I-VIII) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. THE SIGNATURE OF MACPHERSON OIL COMPANY, OWNER OF OIL RIGHTS, PER DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1984 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 84-1350148, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS HAS BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436(a)3C OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNAUTRE IF NOT REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. SCALE: 1" = 20' TRACT NO. 060189 fr► D 1 = I I VARIES VARIES IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 10 FD L&T RCE 20327 NO REF 02 SET L&T RCE 30826 5 0' NOTHING FD NOTHING SET No— SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS • • • INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP FIRST STREET N 77'49'30"E 137.78' 1 30.00' TRANSIT LINE PER FM 21190 00' + 5 0' 30' 111 .n111 5 0' 18.00' FD L&T NO REF 0 H 2 0' 30' 20' 30' D Z w VARIES ANGLE POINT ESTAB AT REC. ANGLE AND DIST. PER FM 21190 FROM C/L 1ST STREET VARIES M,00,01.Z1 N 89.78' N 77'49'30"E 79.80' NOTA PART OF THIS SUBDIVISION S'LY LINE OF LOT 4, BLOCK 41, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, M.B. 1-59-60, ESTAB. BY PRORATION N 7748'37"E 79.90' z N 0' FD L&T NO REF. ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE INTERSECTION 2 0' 10' 10' N 81'43'28"E 1.08' 5 0' 20' L VARIES 1 z v1 Cr) VARIES cn CI 5.01' ESTAB. INTERSECTION PER TIES C.E.F.B. NO. 151 N N v O • 0 N A = 7,203 SQ. FT. 79.98' N 7747'45"E 79.51' N 77'47'45"E 114.28' • 0 N 1 1 c0 O O c0 1 ■ FIRST COURT w 1 10' 10' Lo ▪ 2 0' ro 0 z� 0 < 1 2 0 10' P1 0' 10' FD L&T PER P.M. NO. 26479 P.M.B. 315-3-4 109.27' `r -14 LYN D O N STREET FD L&T PER PM NO. 26479 P.M.B. 315-3-4 ESTAB. INTERSECTION PER TIES C.E.F.B. 61 (109.27') FROM L&T C/L OF PALM DRIVE