Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06/01/05
AGENDA ;kC CITY CLERK ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, June 1, 2005 - 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall 1315 Valley Drive MAYOR CITY CLERK J. R. Reviczky Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Peter Tucker John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Sam Y. Edgerton Stephen R. Burrell Michael Keegan CITY ATTORNEY Art Yoon Michael Jenkins CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. 1. PRELIMINARY BUDGET REVIEW a. OVERVIEW OF BUDGET CHANGES b. OVERVIEW OF REVENUE CHANGES c. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES RECOMMENDATION: Review and provide direction to staff. 2. Letter from the Hermosa Beach Historical Society requesting $10,000 funding for their museum expansion project. /744 NOTE: THIS MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED LIVE ON ADELPHIA CABLE 1 • f FUND 99 Approp 10, Transfers Appropriated fra prior designatio 2,54 *$25,000 from American i 43.015 ° soo i� Ito, 21,515,515 press donation, 11100 1110 $2,500 from 24 Hour Fitness donation 11 — Sa — UUT — TOT » Total Other Revenue ■ TOTAL REVENUE • Conservative increase o • Governor's ERAF Reducti of $326,429 included ■Decline of 16% due to loss BMW, includes conservative estimate for new Lotus dealer llit 'ili RAL ERVI ENUE • • Represents 15% of Gen 33% over 2002-03 due to revenue 0 d revenue, up mmunications i ■ Represents 8% of GenYrevenue, up 12% over 2003-04 ■ Increased 58% since 2001-0 with 2 new hotels and expansion of a third v 11 PVERV ases: • tud1.1 • inch dg Conside a • Discuss p in business • Adjust Fire Fld� F • Adjust In Lieu Par • ' ■ Adjust Sewer Conne t • Lighting/Landscapingv • Implement Metering or Pa.,� 111 VENUE nal stage her t nue incr ures for occupa 11 rogress) nd Park, Lot A • ,„,41111111111114 „,41III SII 111GEN ROP S ■ Sala ■ Contract. • Supplies, M • Equipment Pu ■ Equip Replacem Total 110 i ce 111) loil GENE ROP 111 (e1to t`�ll ing PER Benefits Contract Ser�r e! Supplies/Mate is Equipment Purc Equip Replacement li7,�►�,1 Total Appropriatio�i ncies) m • Excluding Capital Improvements/Prospect Expenditures �►PITA��II� OJE — Bad — Beac r — Concrete. Locations — Slurry/Crack • — Pier Avenue, Her — Manhattan Avenu LJMENT f6 1��rao. NTS nding nding tion at III con Locations I��CH X11 TAL con — Strand — Hermosa Longfellow, — Manhattan to In CTS O� N rTYI Lig t' ture Rep1.a th Street,. 1111111111100, s 111111TAL CTS 1AFETY — Str »Ten o 24th P c , 24th Street 19th Street, »Palm Drive, M at Vario t. to Lon o PCH ace 21St Street, Hermo Avenue e s�1 treet kihattan • ,‘,11011 TAL *WAFETY FCTS at Vario StF cont Loma' D " Cypress 19th Street, • » 2nd Street, PCI » 1St Place, Barney Avenue » 1st Street, Barney Court to Prospect Avenue ve hattan jth Street Drive enue prospect • PP • i i TAL CTS 1) StF �s cont » Barnc'% » 1St Stree 11 ve »Meyer Cout, s� • terminus — Street Improvemen Tree Project at Vario 1111II 1St pia 'ourt r ren on Blvd. Street • as TAL MENT t'd liui CTS ■ PARK IMPROV — Clark Field I i »New Field Lig t »New Irrigation » Sewer and Water Syst ROVE ovement l $2 III V 1110, �n Improvements 11 pl — Pubi a — Comm t�� — Municipa Pi Upgrades — Beach Restroom — Re -roofing of City — Exterior Painting of TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $5,600,000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM June 1, 2005 TO: Councilman Reviczky FROM: Viki Copeland, Finance Director RE: Total for EOC, Homeland Security Revenue In response to your remaining questions about the budget: • Reduction in Court Fines Revenue - A memo from the Police Chief is attached that explains the change in policy with respect to public intoxication violations. In addition, one time revenue of $43,358 related to the Fire Extinguisher fraud case was received in 2004-05. • Prop A guidelines are attached which outline the uses of Prop A Funds. It does not appear that traffic signals are an eligible expenditure, but we will check with MTA to be sure. • An Explanation of Personnel Summary spreadsheet is attached showing how the personnel in each division total to the Totals by Major Department Designation on the lower half of page 67. • The total amount in the 2005-06 Preliminary Budget for the Emergency Operating Center (EOC) is $30,820, budgeted within the Fire Department accounts 5401 ($5,720) and 5402 ($25,100), pages 143-145. • Revenue received from Homeland Security Grants is $24,892 in 2003- 04 and $34,104 in 2004-05. • A memo from the Police Chief is attached explaining the SART (Sexual Assault Response Team) program that is shown in the budget on page 166. • The increase in the cost for the South Bay Regional Communication Center (dispatching for Police and Fire) is $142,185. • A memo from Public Works is attached which explains the Mobile Plan Center found in the budget on page 186. cc: City Councilmembers C:\Data\Docs\WINWORD\2005-06 budget questions from JR.doc HERMOSA. BEACH POLICE DEPARTME ��w ti w?335 e:»ts HIEFI 44. Wednesday, June 01, 2005 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Viki Copeland, Finance Chief Michael Lavin Reduction in Criminal Violations rges regarding Public Intoxication One of our most common arrests is public intoxication (647f of the Penal Code). When a person is arrested for this offense, the arresting officer can either charge the person with the offense or detain them until they are sober and then release them with no charges pending. The California Penal Code has actually established a release authority for public intoxication (849b2 of the Penal Code). For many years we generally utilized this section when drunks were arrested holding them until they were sober and releasing them with no charges pending. In the past few years, our officers have drifted into the practice of charging all drunks. This resulted in a larger number of trials and the resulting complications that come with trials. These extra cases began filling the court docket. The fact that section 849b2 PC exists recognizes that violations of public intoxication is a very common offense in California and were not meant to be charged in every instance. We have simply returned to the practice of using 849b2 on a regular basis and charging only those habitual drunks that we encounter from time to time. This has resulted in fewer cases yielding fines for the City. • • II. PROJECT ELIGlBILITY The Proposition A and C Ordinances specify that LR funds are to be used for "public transit purposes" as defined in the following: "A proposed expenditure of funds shall be deemed to be for public transit purposes to the extent that it can reasonably be expected to sustain or improve the quality and safety of and/or access to public transit services by the general public or those requiring special public transit assistance". For simplification and user ease, project categories that share common eligibility requirements and/or project code designations are defined and listed as either Prop A and C Eligible, Prop A Exclusive, or Prop C Exclusive. Note: The following project eligibility criteria provides for general guidance only and is not the sole determinant for project approval. The authority to determine the eligibility of an expenditure rests solely with the MTA. Jurisdictions may appeal projects deemed ineligible as described in Section III, MTA's Administrative Process, page 20. A. ELIGIBLE USES OF PROPOSITION A AND C 1. PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICES - OPERATING (Codes 110,120, 130 and 140) New or expanded transit or paratransit services are subject to review under the Service Coordination Process (SCP) as detailed in Section III, page 22. The process will, in part, determine the proposed service's compatibility with the existing regional bus transit system provided by the MTA and services provided by the municipal transit operators. MTA may request that modification be made to proposed services that duplicate or compete with existing services. Proposed services must also meet the criteria outlined under Non-exclusive School Service and Specialized Transit discussed on the following page. Note that Emergency Medical Transportation is not an eligible use of LR funds. Examples of Fixed Route, Paratransit, and Recreational Transit Service projects follow: 1.1 FIXED ROUTE SERVICE (Project Code 110) • New fixed route or flexible destination bus service • Extension or augmentation of an existing bus route(s) • Contracting with a transit operator or private provider for commuter bus service • Operating subsidy to existing municipal or regional bus operator • Service enhancements related to bus/rail interface • ADA improvements to fixed route operations • Shuttle service between activity centers 1.2 PARATRANSIT SERVICE (Project Codes 120 & 130) • Expansion/ coordination of existing paratransit service • Subsidized, shared -ride taxi service for disadvantaged residents • New paratransit service Prop A & C Local Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 • • • General public paratransit service • ADA -related improvements to paratransit operations Non -Exclusive School Service Fixed -route bus services or demand -responsive services available to the general public which also provide school trips are eligible for LR funding. Exclusive school bus services are not eligible. Projects must meet the following conditions: Vehicles utilized cannot be marked "School Bus" or feature graphics that in any way indicate they are not available to the general public. Yellow paint schemes should not be for the specific purpose of meeting the vehicle code definition of a school bus • The bus headsign is to display its route designation by street intersection, geographic area, or other landmark/destination description and cannot denote "School Trip" or "Special." In cases where the service includes an alternate rush- hour trip to provide service by a school location, the dashboard sign is to indicate the line termination without indicating the school name • Timetables for such services will be made available to the general public, shall provide the given schedule and route but must not be labeled "school service" • Drivers must be instructed that such service is available to the general public and board and alight all passengers as required at designated stops • The same fare payment options must be made available to all users • The overall transportation service provided in the Jurisdiction must not be for school service hours only Specialized Public Transit The MTA will approve special -user group service or social service transit where it can be incorporated into the existing local transit or paratransit program. Jurisdictions must demonstrate that existing services cannot be modified to meet the identified user need. Projects must meet the following conditions: • The special user group identified does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, sex, disability or ethnicity • Service shall be available to all members of the general public having that specialized need and not be restricted to a specific group or program • Service shall be advertised to the general public • MTA may require, as a condition of approval, inter jurisdictional project coordination and consolidation • LR funds may only be used for the transportation component of the special user group program, i.e., direct, clearly identifiable and auditable transportation costs, excluding salaries for specialized escorts or other program aides • The designated vehicle(s) used must be made available for coordination with other paratransit programs if space permits Prop A & C Local'Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 3 • • 1.3 RECREATIONAL TRANSIT SERVICE (Project Code 140) Jurisdictions shall submit a listing of Recreational Transit Services at the end of each fiscal year. Recreational Transit Service projects must meet the following conditions: • Travel within the area of Los Angeles, Orange and Ventura Counties, and portions of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties (see map Appendix VI) are eligible expenditures. Trip segments outside of this area must be funded through other sources • Trips may be limited to certain general age groups (e.g., children under 18, senior citizens, persons with disabilities), however, trips must be made available to all individuals within that designated group Special events or destinations (e.g., city parks, concerts, special events) may be served, however, all members of the general public including individuals with disabilities must be informed of, and allowed to use, the service • LR funds may not be used to pay the salaries of recreation leaders or escorts involved in recreational transit projects 2. BUS STOP IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE (Codes 150,160 & 170) Amenities shall be integral (within eight (8) feet) to the stop. Curb cuts located on or adjacent to street segments (blocks) with bus stops are eligible. Examples of Bus Stop Improvement and Maintenance projects follow: • Concrete bus pads (i.e. bus landings) at stops • Curb cuts • Bus turn -outs • Installation/replacement and/or maintenance of bus benches or shelters including necessary concrete work Conditions: Jurisdictions shall coordinate bus stop improvements (excluding curb cuts) with affected transit operators. A letter of coordination must be submitted with the Project Description Form. Jurisdictions that propose replacing privately owned benches or shelters must notify the provider before requesting City Council project approval. The provider shall have seven (7) days to respond to the notification before the Jurisdiction takes further action. 3. PUBLIC TRANSIT - CAPITAL (Project Codes 180,190 & 200) Public Transit Capital projects will be approved only for the percentage of vehicle or equipment use, as determined by MTA staff, exclusive to public transit service. A list of sample Public Transit Capital projects follows: a. Vehicles/parts purchases and repairs • Transit vehicles for passenger service • Mechanical parts and supplies for buses or vans • Non -revenue support vehicles, i.e., supervisors cars, service trucks • ADA -related improvements to vehicles • Retrofits or additions to buses or vans, i.e. lifts, fareboxes, or radios • Security equipment, i.e., cameras on buses Prop A & C Local Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 • • b. Equipment • New or modified transit maintenance facilities • Maintenance equipment for new or existing transit or paratransit operations • Office equipment and furnishings for new and existing transit and paratransit operations NOTE: Jurisdictions shall reimburse their LR Account, in the amount of the current appraised value or purchase price from resale, for Public Transit Capital projects no longer used for public transit purposes. 4. TRANSIT SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (TSM) (Project Code 210) TSM projects are relatively low-cost, non -capacity -enhancing traffic control measures that serve to improve vehicular (bus and car) flow and/or increase safety within an existing right-of-way. Proposals must include an element demonstrating the project's benefit to public transit. A list of sample TSM projects follows: • Reserved bus lanes (no physical separation) on surface arterials • Contra -flow bus lanes (reversible lanes during peak travel periods) • Ramp meter by-pass (regulated access with bus/carpool unrestricted entry) • Traffic signal priority for buses (to allow approaching transit vehicles to extend green phase or change traffic signal from red to green) • Preferential turning lanes for buses • Other traffic signal improvements that facilitate bus movement • Arterial HOV lanes 5. TRANSIT SECURITY (Project Codes 220 & 230) Transit Security projects may include Transit Safety, Security Operations and Safety Education Programs, provided that they demonstrate a direct benefit to public transit service and do not supplant general law enforcement programs. A list of sample Transit Security Programs follows: • Local police deployment for direct and specific transit security • Private security (state licensed) deployment for transit security Contracted police services for direct and specific transit security Capital improvements for transit security Innovative and/or advanced technology transit security • Community-based policing activities in direct support of transit security • Security awareness, graffiti prevention, and/or crime prevention programs NOTE: Jurisdictions are encouraged to participate in existing local and regional transit security efforts which should be coordinated through MTA. 6. FARE SUBSIDY (Project Codes 240 & 250) Fare Subsidy programs provide residents within Jurisdictions a discount fare incentive for using public transit. The method, amount of subsidy and user group(s) Prop A & C Local Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 • _ • shall be determined by Jurisdictions. A list of sample Fare Subsidy Programs follows: • User -side subsidies (buydown of passes, tickets, or coupons) for the general public or segments of the general public (i.e., elderly, individuals with disabilities, or low-income residents) • Subsidy of bus/rail passes, tickets or tokens for transit riders 7. RIDESHARING (Project Code 260) Ridesharing projects shall be available to the general public and must be coordinated through existing rideshare programs and/or appropriate transit operators. A list of sample Rideshare Programs follows: • Vanpool/carpool formation/subsidy/operation • New rider subsidy programs • Ride -matching programs 8. TRANSIT MARKETING Transit Marketing projects may include: • Transit user guides, maps, brochures • Transit information kiosks • Transit information/pass sales centers • New rider subsidy programs (Project Code 280) 9. PARK-AND-RIDE LOTS (Project Code 290) Park -and -Ride Lot projects must be coordinated with MTA and appropriate affected transit operator(s). Additional justification including, for example, surveys or studies that provide a basis for determining the project's level of public transit use and related funding, may be requested prior to project evaluation. Park -n -Ride Lot projects shall: • be located adjacent (no greater than .25 mile away) to a fixed route service bus stop, HOV lanes and/or commuter rail stations. • be located on unimproved land unless a specific MTA waiver is granted. • have received environmental clearance by the Jurisdiction prior to MTA approval. • require a letter from the affected transit operator(s) to the Jurisdiction and MTA, as reasonable assurance, that park-and-ride lot users will be assured of continued access to services. • be used exclusively by transit/rideshare patrons during commute hours. • have appropriate exclusive -use signage posted and enforced. • be open for general parking during non -transit use time, e.g., evenings and weekends, provided that transit user demands are not adversely impacted. All revenues, (i.e. parking, advertising or related revenue) generated during the non - transit use time must be returned to the Jurisdictions' LR Account in the same proportion as the original LR investment in the facility. In the event that the facility ceases operation, the Jurisdiction shall be required to repay its LR Account as scheduled on page 32. Prop A & C Local Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 • • 10. TRANSIT FACILITIES (Project Codes 290, 300 & 310) Examples of Transit Facility projects include: • Bus -only transit malls or stations • Transit/paratransit accessible transfer centers that feature, for example, shelters, telephones, information displays/centers, and/or other related amenities) Conditions: Jurisdictions shall submit a project budget and scope of work that specifies the proposed facility's public transit and, if applicable, joint development. Additional documentation may be required to determine project eligibility and level of funding. If the facility ceases to be used for public transit purposes, LR funds used toward land purchase for a facility must be returned at the original purchase price or present appraised value, whichever is greater, to the Jurisdiction's LR Account. Repayment of facility expenditures shall be based on the schedule outlined on page 27. Prior to land and/or facility purchases, Jurisdictions shall provide the following: • Documentation of the financial resources for facility implementation, operation and maintenance Assurance(s) from the affected transit carrier(s) to provide facility service Land appraisal Assurance that the Jurisdiction will proceed with the project per the implementation schedule outlined in the application • Environmental clearance in conformance with, wherever applicable, all local, state and federal requirements. Jurisdictions preparing an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must coordinate with the MTA Regional Transportation Planning and Development Department. 11. METRO CAPITAL (Project Codes 320, 330 & 340) Metro Rail Capital projects may include, for example, Metro Red, Blue or Green Line station or line improvements, local match toward Metro Rail Capital projects, Metro Art or related Metro Rail enhancements. 12. RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS (Project Code 350) Right -of -Way Improvements or land purchases must be coordinated through MTA to ensure consistency with adopted regional corridors, priorities/or preferred alignments. Right -of -Way Improvement project proposals must also demonstrate direct, quantifiable, environmental and/or economic benefit to given transit services. 13. RAIL (Project Codes 360, 370 & 390) Rail (commuter system and station enhancement) projects must be consistent with MTA's existing and planned program of rail projects. Examples of Rail projects include: Prop A & C Local Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 7 • • Signal upgrades at rail crossings • Transit security at commuter rail stations and park-and-ride facilities (to be coordinated through MTA with regional efforts) • Signage and marketing materials to promote increased commuter rail ridership • Landscaping, lighting, fencing and environmental enhancements at or along commuter rail facilities • System safety • MTA/SCRRA safety education programs • Commuter rail station operating, maintenance, insurance, or other station -related costs 14. CAPITAL RESERVE (Project Code 380) A Capital Reserve project provides Jurisdictions the opportunity to accumulate LR funds (over and above the year of allocation and three year expenditure'requirement) to finance a large project. Projects are limited to construction of bus facilities, bus purchases, transit centers, park-and-ride lots, construction of major street improvements or rail projects along MTA's planned and adopted rail corridors. A Capital Reserve project constitutes a long term financial and planning commitment. For specific information on the Capital Reserve approval process, see Section III, MTA's Administration Process, page 23. 15. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (Project Code 410) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) projects are defined as strategies/actions intended to influence the manner in which people commute, resulting in a decrease in the number of vehicle trips made and vehicle miles traveled during peak travel periods. TDM projects require a public transit element and will be evaluated on their projected impact on reduction of single -occupancy vehicle trips and corresponding vehicle miles traveled. A list of sample TDM projects follow: Formation of vanpool and/or vanpool incentive programs (must be made available to all employers and/or residents within the Jurisdiction boundaries Community-based shuttles for employees as long as such services complement existing transit service Parking Management, i.e., parking cashouts, parking pricing strategies Employer and/or citizen ride -matching programs and subsidies • Formation and/or ongoing operation of a Transportation Management Association to administer and market local TDM programs (provided that the 20 administrative cost stipulated for Prop A and C is not exceeded) • Transit and TDM -related activities required by the Congestion Management Program"(CMP) including: preparation of TDM ordinances; administration and implementation of transit or TDM -related projects pursuant to CMP deficiency plans; and monitoring of transit standards by transit operators Prop A & C Local Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 • • Funding Transportation Management Organization's (TMO) insurance costs or individual employer's vanpool programs under the umbrella vehicle insurance policy of the Jurisdiction Jurisdictions are encouraged to adopt monitoring and evaluation performance standards for funding TDM projects. Jurisdictions are encouraged to utilize regionally adopted standards, and demonstrate, for example, how AQMP trip reduction targets are addressed through the TDM measure. In conformity with regional, state and federal air quality objectives, the MTA encourages use of alternative -fuel vehicles (e.g. LNG, CNG, Methanol) for any TDM -related shuttle, vanpool or paratransit vehicles. 16. DIRECT ADMINISTRATION (Project Code 480) Direct Administration is defined as those salaries and benefits, office supplies and equipment directly associated with administering LR operating and capital projects. Direct Administration project conditions: • All costs shall be associated with developing, maintaining, monitoring, coordinating, reporting and budgeting specific LR project(s) • The administrative portion of the project cost shall not exceed 20 percent of the LR approved project budget • Expenditures must be reasonable and appropriate to the activities undertaken by the locality • Jurisdictions are required to report all administrative charges to Direct Administration in order to verify compliance of 20% administration cap. Prop A & C Local Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 • • B. EXCLUSIVE USES OF PROPOSITION A FUNDS Projects listed below are eligible for Prop A LR funding only. Jurisdictions must certify that all project conditions will be met and include all supporting documents with submittal of the Form A. Stand alone amenities such as traffic signals, landscaping and storm drains are ineligible. Note: The following project eligibility criteria provides general guidance only and is not the sole determinant for project approval. The authority to determine the eligibility of an expenditure rests solely with the MTA. Jurisdictions may appeal projects deemed ineligible as described in Section III, page 20. 1. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (Project Code 270) Planning, engineering and design costs incurred toward the implementation of an eligible Prop A LR project are eligible when the following conditions are met: • All planning, engineering or design activities must be related to development of an eligible Prop A LR project. • Program activities must be initiated with the intent by the Jurisdiction to fund the respective developed Prop A LR project by formal submittal to the MTA. 2. SYNCHRONIZED SIGNALIZATION (Project Code 400) Synchronized Signalization projects must meet the following eligibility conditions: • Bus priority must be included as an element of the project • The project arterial must be used by a minimum of ten full-sized transit buses, counted bi-directionally, per hour, e.g., five buses hourly in each direction • Projects may be implemented only on major arterials • Documentation of coordination with affected public transit operators is required for approval (e.g., correspondence between the Jurisdiction and the transit operator with written concurrence between the transit operator and MTA) 3. FUND EXCHANGE (Project Code 405) Prop A funds may be given, loaned, or exchanged by Jurisdictions provided that the following conditions are met: • Participants are responsible for insuring that the traded funds will be utilized for public transit purposes • The exchange of funds should not result in a net loss of revenues available for public transit in Los Angeles County (i.e., trade of Prop A funds for farebox or other transit revenues) • Traded Prop A LR funds retain their original date of allocation and lapse date. Jurisdictions submitting Fund Exchange projects shall note the year of allocation on their Form A so that the fund lapse policy may be monitored. In addition, Jurisdictions shall provide the following detail in submitting Fund Exchange projects for approval: • Source of funds to be exchanged • Fund amounts to be exchanged Prop A & C Local Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 • • • Period of exchange • Assurance that the end use of Prop A LR funds will be for eligible transit uses Provision for circumstances should source of funds (one or both) become unavailable during the exchange period. Certification by participating Jurisdictions (e.g. City Council action) A sample Fund Exchange Agreement is included in Appendix V. NOTE: Jurisdictions participating as the "seller" in a Prop A Fund Exchange projects will, for two years from the date of transaction, be subject to disqualification or reduced project application scores in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Call for Projects. C. EXCLUSIVE USES OF PROPOSITION C FUNDS Projects listed below are eligible for Prop C LR funding only. Jurisdictions must certify that all project conditions will be met and include all supporting documents with submittal of the Form A. Jurisdictions are encouraged to use LR funds for improved public transit services. Stand alone amenities such as traffic signals, landscaping, storm drains are ineligible. Note: The following project eligibility criteria provides for general guidance only and is not the sole determinant for project approval. The authority to determine the eligibility of an expenditure rests solely with the MTA. Jurisdictions may appeal projects deemed ineligible as described in Section III, page 20. 1. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (Code 270) Planning, engineering and design costs incurred toward the implementation of an eligible Prop C LR project are eligible when the following conditions are met: • All planning, engineering or design activities must be related to development of an eligible Prop C LR project. • Program activities must be initiated with the intent by the Jurisdiction to fund the respective developed Prop C LR project by formal submittal to the MTA. 2. SYNCHRONIZED SIGNALIZATION (Project Code 400) Synchronized Signalization projects must meet the following conditions: • Projects shall be implemented only on major arterials • The major arterial targeted for implementation must have full-sized transit buses operating on regularly scheduled fixed route(s) • Documentation of coordination with affected public transit operators is required for approval (e.g., correspondence between the Jurisdiction and the transit operator with written concurrence from the transit operator to the MTA) 3. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) (Project Code 420) The following provides a list of sample CMP projects: • Preparation of TDM ordinances and deficiency plans Prop A & C Local Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 • • • Land use analysis as required by CMP • Computer modeling as required to support CMP land use analysis • Administration, monitoring and implementation of transit- or TDM -related projects as part of deficiency plans • Monitoring of transit standards by transit operators 4. BIKEWAYS AND BIKE LANES (Project Code 430) Bikeway projects including bike lane/way construction and maintenance, signage, information/safety programs, and bike lockers must meet the following conditions: • Shall be linked to employment sites • Shall be usable as a commuting facility • Jurisdictions must have an approved PMS (see page 17) 5. STREET IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE (Codes 440,450 & 460) Capacity enhancements, repairs and maintenance, TSM efforts and safety improvements represent a sampling of eligible Street Improvement and Maintenance Projects. Projects must meet the following conditions and reporting requirements: A. CONDITIONS: Public Transit Benefit Projects must demonstrate a public transit benefit or be performed on streets "heavily used by public transit," where such streets carry regularly - scheduled, fixed -route public transit service, and where service has operated for a minimum of one (1) year and there are no foreseeable plans to discontinue such service. If there are no fixed -route systems within a Jurisdiction, or if all the streets supporting fixed -route systems are already in a satisfactory condition as documented by the required Pavement Management System (PMS), a Jurisdiction may use LR funds for street improvements and maintenance and repair on streets within their community on which they can demonstrate that public paratransit trips (in service for a minimum of one year) concentrate. The method of demonstrating heavy -use by paratransit vehicles is to document trip pick-up and drop-off locations, including street -routing, for a consecutive three month time period. The data will be used in making a determination on which street segments have heavy -use by this form of transit. Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Requirement The goal of the Prop C LR Program is to improve transportation conditions, including the roadways upon which public transit operates. Prop A & C Local Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 • • Therefore, Jurisdictions that utilize Prop C LR funds to improve those road systems heavily utilized by public transit shall document that these funds are not being used to replace general or discretionary funds that traditionally have been used for street systems (i.e., Maintenance of Effort requirement). Prop 111, passed by the voters in June of 1990, enacted Section 2105(c) of the California Streets and Highways Code which requires Jurisdictions to maintain previous funding levels (three-year average) from their generalfunds for their street and road systems. MTA will accept the State Controller's finding of a Jurisdiction's compliance with Section 2105(c) of the Streets and Highways Codes as sufficient to demonstrate the required Maintenance of Effort during any fiscal year in which Prop C LR funds are expended for streets and roads. In cases of hardship which make it difficult for Jurisdictions to meet the MOE requirements of Prop 111, the MTA will consider exceptions to the Prop C LR MOE requirements. In these circumstances, the MTA will make a determination on a case-by-case basis. B. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Street maintenance rehabilitation or reconstruction projects may be submitted individually or as an annual program. Jurisdictions shall submit a Project Description Form listing all new project street segments prior to undertaking each annual street maintenance program. Jurisdictions will be advised as to any eligible and ineligible street segments within 30 day of project submittal. Project Description Forms and Annual Expenditure Reports must be reflected on subsequent Form B submittals (due each August 1) until the project is completed or deleted from the work program. Once deleted, a segment must be re -submitted for approval if a new street maintenance project on the segment is subsequently planned. Eligible Street Improvement and Maintenance Projects 1. Exclusive Bus Lane Street Widening Such projects are for exclusive bus lanes (physically separated) on surface arterials. 2. Street Improvement Street Improvement projects are level -of -service and/or capacity improvements or capital projects that improve safety for all vehicles, and must include a public transit element that comprises of transit vehicles on streets that are "heavily used by transit." Prop A & C Local Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 • • Examples of these projects include street widening, improved channelization or capacity enhancements. 3. Street Repair and Maintenance Eligible Street Repair and Maintenance projects are limited to pavement maintenance, rehabilitation or restoration (slurry seals, resurfacing) and reconstruction including required curb and gutter repair (storm drains) on streets "heavily used by transit." Betterments are not eligible for LR funding. 4. Americans with Disabilities Act Related Street Improvements In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the provision of curb cuts at or adjacent to bus stops and other accessible improvements on roadways "heavily used by transit" is an eligible use of Prop C LR funds. Such modifications must meet ADA and California Title 24 specifications. 6. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PMS) (Project Code 470) Sample Pavement Management System projects include: • One-time development cost of a Pavement Management System. • The ongoing cost of maintaining a PMS equal to the proportion of a Jurisdiction's eligible street mileage to total street mileage; or 50% of the PMS maintenance cost, whichever is greater. Note: Jurisdictions are required to certify that they have conducted and maintain Pavement Management Systems when proposing "Street Repair and Maintenance" or "Bikeway" projects. The requirement for a Pavement Management System (PMS) is consistent with Streets & Highways Code Section 2108.1. PMS Certifications must include the following: • Inventory of existing pavements including, as a minimum, arterial and collector routes, reviewed and updated biennially; • Inventory of existing Class I bikeways, reviewed and updated biennially; • Assessment of pavement condition including, as a minimum, arterial and collector routes, reviewed and updated biennially; • Identification of all pavement sections needing rehabilitation/replacement; and • Determination of budget needs for rehabilitation or replacement of deficient sections of pavement for current and following biennial period(s) Self -certifications (included in Appendix III) executed by the Jurisdiction's Engineer or designated, registered civil engineer, must be submitted biennially on or before June 1, to satisfy "Street Repair and Maintenance" and "Bikeway" project eligibility criteria. Prop A & C Local Return Guidelines Adopted FY99 Explanation of Personnel Summary City Manager City Council Source Reduction Information Systems City Treasurer 1.36 0.50 0.14 (City Manager & City Manager Secretary) 2.00 4.00 0.50 City Clerk 1.75 Personnel/Risk Management Personnel 1.00 Liability Insurance 0.50 Workers' Comp Insurance 0.50 2.00 Finance Administration 5.20 Cashier 5.30 10.50 General Appropriations 1.00 Fire 21.00 Police/Community Services Police 49.00 Community Services 13.00 TRAP 1.00 Community Resources Rec Transportation 63.00 3.65 0.04 3.69 Public Works Admin 5.10 Building Maintenance 2.80 Downtown Enhancement 0.50 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 1.70 Parks Division 1.80 Sewers/Storm Drains 2.85 Street Maintenance/Traffic Safety 4.35 Equipment Service 2.10 21.20 Community Development Building 5.00 Planning 4.76 Source Reduction 0.04 (Community Development Director) Commuter Express 0.02 Dial -A -Ride 0.18 10.00 Grand Total 138.64 HERMOSABEACH POLICE DEPARTMEN- 4 ':. OFFICE"OF THECHIEF OF POLICE Wednesday, June 01, 2005 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Viki Copeland, Finance Chief Michael Lavin The SART Program The SART program (Sexual Assault Response Team) is an extremely valuable investigative tool utilized' in rape investigations. The SART team at Little Company of Mary Hospital in Torrance is a highly trained team of medical professionals that conduct rape examinations. They collect physical evidence, provide detailed reports, and provide after care medical assistance to the rape victim including referrals to rape counselors. These people will also testify in court when needed. Our detectives feel that this service has become a highly valuable tool in the successful prosecution of rape suspects. SBRPCA January 20, 2005 Mr. Steve Burrell City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority 4440 West Broadway • Hawthorne,California 90250 Re: 2005-2006 Assessment for Communications Services Dear Steve: 4 FIRE 0911 0+ POLICE p ? "'NICPI‘ This letter shall serve as formal notification of the 2005-2006 communications services' assessment for the City of Hermosa Beach Police and Fire Departments. As specified in the "Agreement for Emergency Police and Fire Dispatch Services" between the City of Hermosa Beach and the South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority, last year's annual fee of $513,000 will be increased by 3.35% based on the 2004 calendar year consumer price index (CPIU) used for Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside Counties (see enclosed document). The 2005-2006 assessment will be $530,185. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (310) 973-1802 X101. Sincerel Ralph Mailloux Executive Director REM:ww Enclosure A/ed firt cc: Chief Michael Lavin Chief Russell Tingley Finance/Accounting Manager John Gilbert Financial Accountant Chellette McDonald -Harden Phone (310) 973- 1802 www.rcc 9 I 1 .org Fax (310) 978-0892 Citi of 21ernwsa Teach Inter Office Memorandum DATE: June 1, 2005 TO: Viki Copeland, Finance Director FROM: Richard D. Morgan, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Requested Budget Clarification The following information is provided in response to your request. The Mobile Plan Center and additional requested materials and equipment are needed to centralize and update plan storage; making plans easily accessible for all members of the department. MOBILE PLAN CENTER (1 each) The vertical files containing Mylar plans for past projects are filled to capacity. Due to the lack of space in the PW storage room, a mobile plan center is necessary to hold recently completed projects (within the last 5 years). The mobile center can be placed against the wall in the back of the department or in the general storage room. CUBICLE WALL RACKS (4 each) Cubicle wall racks would be useful to conveniently hang active project plans thereby clearing space on drafting tables and/or rolling plan racks. This would also make it easier for staff members to find active project plans in case anyone wants to see the plans for any reason. This would make it easy for our administrative staff locate plans for residents, other staff members, or Council Members while the engineers are in the field or in meetings. PRINT -LOCK HANGING CLAMPS (5 cartons) These clamps would be used in conjunction with the mobile plan center and cubicle wall racks. These clamps hold the plan sheets in place. DRAFTING STOOL WITH FOOT RING (1 each) We currently have two drafting tables in use with one drafting stool. Another stool is needed. 3M EXECUTIVE ANTIGLARE/ANTI-RADIATION FILTER (7 each) Long hours in front of a computer monitor put a lot of strain on the eyes. These filters block 99.9% of the radiation. We are requesting seven filters for the seven computers in our department. rbp/c/memo Legend PROPOD FY 2005-06 STREET IMPROVEME ROJECTS STREETS IN GOOD CONDITION STREETS IN NEED OF FUTURE REPAIRS CIP 04-117 MANHATTAN AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS CIP 05-413 SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (INCLUDES STREET IMPROVEMENTS) CIP 05120 STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS et_ CIP 02-104 BAY VIEW UNDERGROUNDING STREET IMPROVEMENTS CIP 5-119 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 21ST STREET, HERMOSA AVE, AND LONGFELLOWAVENUE CIP 04-116 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PIER AVENUE FROM HERMOSA AVE TO PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY CIP 02-106 BEACH DRIVE UNDERGROUNDING STREET IMPROVEMENTS - BONNIE BRAE AVENUE UUD BOUNDARY - PROSPECT AVENUE UUD BOUNDARY - BAY VIEW DRIVE UUD BOUNDARY - BEACH DRIVE UUD BOUNDARY 250125 Feel PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAY 17, 2005 • * CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BASED ON THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROJECT NUMBER: CONSTRUCTION COSTS: CIP 05-120 $1,239,015 CIP 05-119 $658,712 CIP 04-117 $600,000 CIP 04-116 $1,500,000 CIP 02-106 $86, 765 CIP 02-104 $150,000 CIP 05-413 $74,404 CIP 05-109 $56,250 CIP 05-110 $74,100 TOTAL FY05-06 PROJECTS: $4,439,246 ESTIMATE OF ALL STREETS IN NEED OF REPAIR: $15,639,861 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN STREETS IN NEED OF REPAIRS AND PROPOSED FY 05-06 PROJECTS: 30% MARK-UP: (WHICH INCLUDES ENGINEERING, STAFF, CONTINGENCIES.) $11,200,615 $3,360,185 ESTIMATE OF STREETS IN NEED OF FUTURE REPAIRS: $14,560,800 keeping local government revenue "whole". The three-month "gap" is supposed to be repaid in August 2006. Beginning in 2004-05, cities continued to receive the .67% portion \of the fee directly from the State however they have backfilled the 2% to .67% VLF reduction with an additional allocation of local property tax from County ERAF funds. This is the amount that is identified as Property Tax In -Lieu of Vehicle License Fees in the Revenue Detail by FundReport. In the future, the revenue may be merged with property tax revenue since from 2005-06 on, measurement and growth will be based upon assessed valuation instead of the original VLF valuation. (previous to 2004-05, the VLF revenue appeared in the Intergovernmental/State category of the revenue report under In Lieu Motor Vehicle) Sales Tax Estimated sales tax revenue declines by 6%. The assumption includes loss of the BMW dealership and a conservative estimate of revenue for the Lotus dealership, which remains on a portion of the property. 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 Sales Tax 1994 - 2006 f-, 414cPg(30;\e c' ootiotio A°'4,S`4,S` g9� 1gg� qgb qg^ gq°°ti'boo pb Note: For chart presentation purposes, Sales Tax and In Lieu Sales Tax were combined. less often than sales tax. Supposedly, there will be amount; there will be lost investment opportunity ho Sales tax represents 13% of total General Fund revenue. The State sales tax rate for Los Angeles County is currently 8 1/4%, distributed as follows: 6% State; 1% City of Hermosa Beach (or city point of sale, generally), County Transportation 1/4%, Proposition A Transportation 1/2%, Proposition C Transportation 1/2%. Utility User Tax Utility user tax (UUT), which applies to use of electricity, gas, water, cable, and telecom comprises 15% of General Fund revenue. The tax rate is 6%. $700,000 of the revenue is transferred to the Sewer Fund for sewer operations and maintenance. 17 As in the 2004-05 Budget, you will continue to see a line item entitled "In Lieu Sales Tax" in the revenue accounts. This is the amount of the "Triple Flip" which resulted from the Governor's ballot measure to finance 2002-03 and 2003-04 state budget deficits. Sales tax was taken from local governments to guarantee State debt in order to obtain a more favorable investment category and thereby a lower rate of interest. The funds will be paid back to local governments, using the property tax schedule, which is less advantageous for cities since property tax is paid no actual loss to the city of the principal wever, due to the cash flow impact. 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 Utility User Tax 1994 - 2006 gb 04. CO. gb gl g4 °JA oo 01 A'Io p oa i5� sx '`gr grD1, 1, b �g^1gg�, 1°°'400'L°oti bpob SCHEDULE OF REVENUE BY UND 2004-05 2003-04 Year End Actual Estimate 2u05-06 Increase Percent Budget (Decrease) Change General Fund Property Taxes Pales & Use Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Business License Tax Utilit Users Tax $5,885,480 $7,090,036 $7,573,866 2,759,037 _ 2522,137 _ .2,123,831 1,291,689 1,450,000 1,450,000 693,865 690,000 690,000 2,652,821 2,780,000 2,849,500 $483,830 6.82% 0 0 69,500 0.00% 0.00% 2.50% Other Taxe 757 794 937,0 ,000 Licenses & Permits Fines & Forfeitures Use of Property & Money Other Governments Service Charges Other Revenue 664,169 365,811 381,714 959,110 1,321,295 532,178 625,528 460,000 305,657 182,606 1,420,712 203,886 618,204 375,000 314,059 187,070 1,779,672 58,708 (7,324) -1.17% (85,000) -18.48% 8,402 2.75% 4,464 2.44% 358,960 25.27% (145,178) -71.21% Total General Fund Lighting & Landscaping Fund Downtown Enhancement Fund Parking Fund State Gas Tax Fund AB 939 Fund Prop A Open Space Fund Tyco Fund Parks/Rec Facility Tax Fund UUT Railroad Right of Way Fund Building Improvement Fund Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund Lower Pier District Administrative Expense Fund Myrtle District Administrative Expense Fund Loma District Administrative Expense Fund Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Exp Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Prop A Transit Fund Prop C Fund Grant Fund Office of Traffic Safety Grant Fund Air Quality Improvement Fund Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund California Law Enforcement Equipment Program Taskforce for Reg Authotheft Prevention Fund Sewer Fund Asset Seizure/Forfeiture Fund Fire Protection Fund Retirement Stabilization Fund Contingency Fund Capital Improvement Fund Artesia Boulevard Relinquishment Fund Lower Pier Avenue Improvement Fund Myrtle Utility Underground Improvement Fund Loma Utility Underground Improvement Fund Bayview Dr Util Undrgrndng Dist Imp Fund Beach Dr Assessment Improvmnt Fund Lower Pier District Redemption Fund Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund. Myrtle Avenue Assessment Fund Loma Drive Assessment Fund Insurance Fund * Equipment Replacement Fund * $18,264,963 $18,667,562 $456,230 953,438 2,904,002 361,801 68,131 20,558 316,079 71,537 11,865 95 0 2,807 9,290 10,189 0 579,429 327,911 240,428 89,448 15,440 22,828 102,956 1,073 112,102 141,472 9,459 98,750 4,467 59,857 43,658 11,541 1,539 223 2,239 0 12,000 450 0 0 2,309 1,592 1,444,455 1,168,050 $457,834 1,987,325 3,224,228 417,078 75,889 1,564,567 663,437 80,595 892 126 0 2,889 9,140 9,991 2,870 66,088 330,577 255,479 635,469 711,845 22,716 103,866 1,118 123,293 118,452 8,760 92,305 26,902 65,263 69,584 14,798 2,099 132 2,951 1,088,269 492,573 330 293 87 1,260 981 1,520,790 1,132,536 $18,965,910 $298,348 1.60% $457,497 1,131,748 3,270,233 380,279 75,583 598,290 369,213 82,731 971 139 3,940 2,976 9,402 10,281 2,942 228,766 332,714 267,387 132,374 0 22,740 104,206 1,294 134,531 95,290 9,050 98,037 26,579 60,296 73,358 16,039 2,265 138 3,189 1,530 4,173 325 417 93 1,345 1,066 1,659,134 1,308,494 ($337) -0.07% (855,577) -43.05% 46,005 1.43% (36,799) -8.82% (306) -0.40% (966,277) -61.76% (294,224) -44.35% 2,136 2.65% 79 8.86% 13 10.32% 3,940 87 3.01% 262 2.87% 290 2.90% 72 2.51%. 162,678 246.15% 2,137 0.65% 11,908 4.66% (503,095) -79.17% (711,845) -100.00% 24 0.11% 340 0.33% 176 15.74% 11,238 9.11% (23,162) -19.55% 290 3.31% 5,732 6.21% (323) -1.20% (4,967) -7.61% 3,774 5.42% 1,241 8.39% 166 7.91% 6 4.55% 238 8.07% (1,086,739) -99.86% (488,400) -99.15% (5) -1.52% 124 42.32% 6 6.90% 85 6.75% 85 8.66% 138,344 9.10% 175,958 15.54% Grand Total $27,944,661 $34,053,239 $29,946,965 ($4,106,274) -12.06% * Insurance Fund and Equipment Replacement Fund are internal service funds. Revenue in these funds appear as service charges in individual departments where applicable. See Appendix for General Fund revenue account detail by category. 34 lI E RMOSA 13 EACH .f 1 .. III 1111H.. 1wt? Iuuunr, �� unu I nnnl • -To acquit e. pr.-.krt...d intcrpwt hist<nictl rnLYtxnabil&[ and ,cher rtutcri b pertaining to the hbt<nr of The Gifu of l Icnnosa Beach. This colla unn shall he extethled In bli of (Might. dliin tuwni. inJ`G -hn g learning HISTORICAL SOCIETY City of Hermosa Beach Attn: Steve Burrell / City Manager 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: Historical Museum Expansion Funding Request Dear Mr. Burrell, April 27, 2005 The Hermosa Beach Historical Society is and has been actively raising funds for our museum expansion project. We are at the stage now where we are ready to commence with Stage 1 of the project. We respectfully submit that you forward our request for funding in the amount of $10,000.00 for consideration and hopefully inclusion in the upcoming City budget for next year. The funds will be considered a matching fund and used for electrical upgrade, general space lighting and safety equipment needed for legal compliance in a commercial building (emergency exit lighting, panic bar door hardware & ADA (American Disabilities Act) compliance. Our museum is a wonderful asset for our City and we wish to thank you in advance for your assistance with our request. Sincere) L. Koenig ice -President Hermosa Beach Histon Society Richard L. Koenig 1825 Manhattan Avenue, Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254 310-318-1403 Email: Rick1 aahermosaarts.orq 2 I • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: JUNE 1, 2005 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL )0 FROM: STEPHEN BURRELL, CITY MANAGER T" BUI SUBJECT: 11 STREET PROPERTY (STORAGE DING) PHASE II RESULTS RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize an additional $5000 to perform step out borings around the location where chemical was found. BACKGROUND: Converse Consultants completed the borings for Phase II Environmental Site Assessment and the lab reports of one of the borings shows detectable concentrations of semi -volatile organic compounds at 2 feet below the surface. The chemical found is PAH (Polyaeromatic Hydrocarbons) which is an oil based solvent. A copy of the proposal to do this additional work is attached. If this is approved, the consultant estimates it will take 20-25 working days to deliver a completed report. The purpose of these additional borings is to determine the size of the area that contains the chemical. The soil containing the chemical can remain until the property is developed. The cost of removing it later will be determined by the size and the method for treating this type of chemical. The cost of doing this work is $7,575.00 based on the proposal. ADDITIONAL ITEM May 31, 2005 • • Converse Consultants Over 50 Years of Dedication in Geotechnical Engineering and Environmental Sciences Mr. Sol Blumenfeld City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Subject: Proposal — Additional Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Step -out Borings 552 11th Place Hermosa Beach, California Converse Project No. 05-41-180-00 (-03) Mr. Blumenfeld: Converse Consultants (Converse) appreciates the opportunity to present this proposal to provide additional Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Phase II) consulting services for the referenced property. Based on the preliminary analytical data, one (1) boring, which was completed in the interior of the building, had detectable concentrations of semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) at 2 -feet below ground surface (bgs). The concentrations were above the Preliminary Remediation Goals for residential properties (PRG -r), and/or the PRGs for industrial properties (PRG -i). Additional step -out borings are recommended to further evaluate the extent of the contamination. Scope of Services At this time, the scope of services for soil exploration work will generally consist of the following services. • Conduct a site walk to observe the existing operating conditions at the facility, mark boring locations, and contact Underground Service Alert. 222 East Huntington Drive, Suite 211, Monrovia, California 91016-3500 Telephone: (626) 930-1200 ♦ Facsimile: (626) 930-1212 ♦ e-mail: converse@converseconsultants.com • • City of Hermosa Beach Converse Project No. 05-41-180-00 (-03) May 31, 2005 • Converse is proposing completing two sets of step -out borings using a Limited Access Geoprobe Rig (LAR). — The first set of step -out borings, which will consist of four (4) step -out boring locations, will be placed approximately 5 -feet from the original boring location (GP -1). Soil samples will be collected at 2 and 5 -feet bgs. — The second set of step out borings, which will consist of three (3) step -out boring locations, will be placed approximately 10 -feet from the original boring location (GP -1). Soil samples will again be collected at 2 and 5 -feet bgs. • Soil samples collected from the first set of step -out borings will be analyzed in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Test Method 8270 for SVOCs. The samples will be submitted to a state certified laboratory on a normal 7 -day turnaround time. • Soil samples collected from the second set of step -out borings will only be analyzed if the initial step -out borings have detectable concentrations of SVOCs. Again, the samples will be submitted to the laboratory on a normal 7 -day turnaround time and will be analyzed after receipt of the initial step -out boring results. • All soil samples will be field screened using a photoionization detector (PID). • Converse will observe standard EPA protocol, including chain -of -custody documentation. Sampling equipment will be cleaned with a phosphate -free cleanser prior to sampling, between sample intervals, and between borings to minimize the potential for cross -contamination. Cuttings and rinsate will be containerized and left on site. After the laboratory analysis is reviewed, Converse will advise the City of Hermosa Beach, Community Development Department how to manage the disposal of the investigation -derived wastes. • Prepare an addendum letter summarizing the fieldwork and laboratory results. Converse will include conclusions and recommendations. Time Frame Converse estimates the Scope of Services described will require approximately 20 to 25 business days to complete., Converse will require written authorization to proceed. Written authorization via receipt of a facsimile copy of this proposal is acceptable, provided an original copy is received at Converse's office within three business days. Verbal information can be presented as it develops during the course of the assessments. • Converse Consultants 2 • City of Hermosa Beach Converse Project No. 05-41-180-00 (-03) May 31, 2005 Fees and Conditions Converse's services will be performed in accordance with the enclosed General Conditions (GC99) and Schedule of Fees (EP2005), which form part of this proposal. Our services are for the sole benefit and exclusive use of the City of Hermosa Beach, Community Development Department in accordance with the General Conditions under which these services have been provided. The fee for the Scope of Services described is $7,575.00 and will be billed on a time and materials basis. This cost estimate includes the analytical costs for the second set of step -out borings. If additional analyses, or step -out borings are necessary, a change order request will be issued. Payment terms are net 60 days. Two copies of the report will be provided. Additional report copies are available for $90.00 each. Additional professional services, including revisions to the scope of services, meetings, consultation with other parties, composition of reliance letters or detailed cost estimates are not included in the standard fee. Requested additional services can be provided on a time -and -materials basis. Discovery and Report of Unanticipated Hazardous Materials It is agreed that discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a renegotiation of the Scope of Services or termination of services. Converse will at all times endeavor to perform in a faithful and trustworthy manner. Client understands that Client may be required by local and/or state and/or federal statute to report the discovery of hazardous materials to a government agency. Client also understands that Converse may be required by local and/or state and/or federal statute to report the discovery of hazardous materials to a government agency, and that Converse, when practical, will .do so only after notifying Client. In the event Converse discovers hazardous material that we believe poses an immediate threat to public health and safety, Converse will use its best judgment to notify appropriate emergency personnel for immediate containment. Client agrees to take no action of any kind against Converse when Converse makes a good -faith effort to fulfill legal obligations. Closure Converse carries workers' compensation insurance as required by law. This scope of services will be performed in general accordance with accepted professional environmental principles and practice. Converse makes no other warranty, either express or implied. Converse Consultants 3 1 City of Hermosa Beach Converse Project No. 05-41-180-00 (-03) May 31, 2005 Thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Should you have questions regarding this proposal, please call either Laura Tanaka at (626) 930-1261 or Norman Eke at (626) 930-1260. If it is acceptable as written, please approve and forward one signed copy of this proposal to Converse's office. Sincerely, CONVERSE CONSULTANTS Lauta'9anaka • N6'rman S. Senior Environmental Scientist Encl: General Conditions (GC99) Schedule of Fees (EP2005) Dist: 1/Addressee via Electronic Mail Managing Officer ACCEPTANCE OF AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED' Firm Name: (CLIENT)2 By: (print name) (sign name) Title: Date: Telephone No. ( ) FAX No. ( ) P.O. No./Billing Instructions3: It is understood by both contracting parties that this is not a prevailing wage project as defined in Labor Code Sections 1770-1780. 2 Invoices to be sent to Client, who shall be responsible for payment thereof, unless notified otherwise. Client has received, reviewed, and approved of Converse General Conditions GC99. 3 Billing requirements, including backup documentation, should be mutually agreed upon and indicated here. Subsequent additions or changes should likewise be mutually agreed upon and submitted in writing with appropriate authorization. ® Converse Consultants 4 COOERSE CONSULTANTS Schedule of Fees Environmental Personnel Introduction It is the objective of Converse Consultants to provide Its clients with quality professional and technical services and a continuing source of professional advice and opinions. Services will be performed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. This fee schedule is valid through January 31, 2006. Hourly Charges for Personnel Staff assignments will depend on personnel availability, job complexity, project site location and experience level required to satisfy the technical requirements of the project and to meet the prevailing standard of professional care. Field Technical Services Soils Technician $60 Senior Soils Technician 70 Supervisory Soils Technician 85 Professional Services (Field and Office) Staff Professional $65 Senior Staff Professional 75 Project Professional 90 Senior Professional 110 Principal Professional 130 Principals/Consultants 170 Office Support Clerical/Word Processing $55 Drafting 60 CAD Operator/Drafting Manager 65 An overtime charge of 50 percent of the above hourly rates (excluding Professional Services) will be added for time in excess of eight hours per day at the job site and for all time on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays. Travel time to and from the job site will be charged at the hourly rates for the appropriate personnel. Expenses 1. Exploration expenses (drilling, trenching, etc.) are charged at cost plus fifteen percent. 2. Travel and subsistence expenses (transportation, room and board, etc.) for individuals on projects requiring travel andior living away from a principal office are charged at cost plus fifteen percent. 3. Automobile and truck expenses are charged at cost plus fifteen percent (rentals) or at a rate of fifty cents per mile for company- owned vehicles traveling between principal office and project. 4. Other out-of-pocket direct project expenses (aerial photos, long-distance telephone calls, permits, outside printing services, tests, etc.) are charged at cost plus fifteen percent. Invoices 1. Invoices will be submitted to the Client on a monthly basis, and a final bill will be submitted upon completion of services. 2. Payment is due upon presentation of invoice and is past -due thirty days from invoice date. In the event Client fails to make any payment to Converse when due, Converse may immediately cease work hereunder until said payment, together with a service charge at the rate of eighteen percent per annum (but not exceeding the maximum allowed by law) from the due date. has been received. Further, Converse may at its sole option and discretion refuse to perform any further work irrespective of payment from Client in the event Client fails to pay Converse for services when said payments are due. 3. Client shall pay attorneys' fees or other costs incurred in collecting any delinquent amount. General Conditions The terms and provisions of the Converse General Conditions are incorporated into this fee schedule as though set forth in full. If a copy of the General Conditions does not accompany this fee schedule, Client should request a copy from this office. Converse Consultants EP2005 General Conditions - CONVERSE CONSULTANTS Right of Entry Client warrants to Converse that it has full legal right to authorize Converse's entry upon the real property where Converse's services are to be performed ('Site' herein) and upon all property, if any, required for ingress and egress to the Site. Client authorize, Converse to enter upon the Site and such adjoining property as is necessary to allow Converse to perform its services. Converse will take reasonable precautions to minimize any damage to the Site; however, Client acknowledges that during the normal course of the performance of Converse's services, some damage to the Site may occur. The correction of any damage to the Site (surface or subterranean) shall be the obligation of the Client Information Supplied by Client Client warrants the accuracy of any information supplied by it to Converse, acknowledges that Converse will not verify the accuracy of such information, and agrees that Converse is entitled to rely upon any such information Client shall immediately notify Converse in writing of any data, information or knowledge in the possession of or known to Client relating to the subsurface conditions existing at the Site and shall provide Converse with the location, size and depth of any and all underground tanks, piping or structures existing upon the Site. Client shall defend, 'indemnify and save harmless Converse, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, costs, suits and damages, including attorneys' fees, arising out of errors, omissions and inaccuracies in documents and information provided to Converse by Client. Ownership of Data and Documents; Samples All reports, boring logs, field data, held notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates and other documents prepared by Converse shall remain the property of Converse. Client shall have the right to the use of all data, recommendations, proposals, reports, design criteria and similar information provided to it by Converse i information' herein): provided however, that the information shall not be used or relied upon by any party other than Client, save and except as may be required by the design and licensing requirements of the project for which the information is provided; further, such use shall be limited to the particular site and project for which the information is provided Client's right to the use of the information is expressly conditioned upon Chant's prompt payment to Converse of all sums due under the Client/Converse agreement. In the event of Chest's nonpayment or partial payment of said amounts, Client agrees that it shall not use any of the information for any purpose whatsoever and shall return the same to Converse ripen demand Converse will retain all samples of soil, rock or other materials obtained in the course of performing its services for a period of thirty (30) days. Thereafter, further storage or transfer of samples to Client may be made at Clients expense upon written request from Chest to Converse received by Converse prior to the expiration of the 3D -day period. Converse shall retain permanent records relating to the Converse services for a period of five (5) years following submittal of Converse's report. during which period the records wit be made available to Client upon reasonable notice given by Client and upon payment to Converse of an amount sufficient to reimburse Converse for its necessary and reasonable expenses in making said records available. Standard of Care and Professional Responsibility Client acknowledges that the services to be performed by Converse involve the use cf tests, calculations, analyses and procedures which are in a constant slate of development, improvement and refinement and that, as such: improvements, changes in methods, and modifications of procedures have been made in the past, are now being made, and are expected to continue to be made in the future. Further, Client recognizes that, while necessary for investigations, commonly used exploration methods, such as drilling borings or excavatio trenches, involve an inherent risk For example, exploration on a site containing contaminated materials may result in inducing cross -contamination the prevention of which may not be complete using presently recognized sealing methods Client recognizes that the stale of practice, including but not limited to the practice relating to contamination of hazardous waste conditions, is changing and evolving and that standards existing at the present time may subsequently change as knowledge increases and the state of the practice continues to improve Client recognizes that projects containing contaminated materials may not perform as anticipated by Client, even though Converse's services are performed in accordance with the level of care and skit required of it. Further, certain governmental regulations relating to hazardous waste sites may purport to require achievement of results which cannot be accomplished in an absolute sense. It is recognized that a satisfactorily designed, constructed and maintained monitoring system may assist in the early detection of environments! changes allowing for early correction of problems. Unless it is specifically included in the scope of services to be performed by Converse, Client understands that Caverre Cvnr,*a' a G' 59 • Converse shall not perform such monitoring. The services to be provided by Converse pursuant to the agreement to which these General Conditions are a part shall be provided in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering, environmental, and geologic practice in the area where these services are to be rendered and at the time that services are rendered. Client acknowledges that the present standard in the engineering and geologic professions does not include. and Converse does not extend to Client, a guarantee of perfection of the work contemplated hereby. further, that even in the exercise of normal and reasonable care, errors or omissions may from time to time occur. Except as expressly set forth in these General Conditions, no other warranty. express or implied, is extended by Converse. Converse shall have no duty to supervise, coordinate or otherwise be involved in the performance of services or work by any third party consultant, contractor or subcontractor. Where Converse's services involve field observation of grading, filling and compaction (or any of them), it is agreed: a. That Converse shall in no way be responsible for the manner in which such work is performed by any third party. b. That in the event Converse is to provide periodic observation, Client acknowledges that Converse cannot be responsible for any work performed at a time or times when Converse was not performing its observation services. Converse will not provide an opinion concerning the performance of any third party, save and except to the extent that said work was in fact observed and tested by Converse during the course of construction c. That where Converse's services include continuous observation, Client agrees riot to allow grading; filling or compaction to be performed at any time or times when Converse is not physically present upon the Site and shall restrict the amount and extent of such grading, filling and compaction to that which can be properly observed by Converse personnel present on the Sire. d That in the event Ccnverse is to conduct test borings tor Client, Client acknowledges trial the accuracy of said test borings relates cnly to the specific location in which the boring itself was performed and that the nature of many sites is such that differing subsurface soil characteristics can be experienced within a small distance. As such, Client acknowledges that greater accuracy is obtained when the number of test borings is increased Indemnity of Client and Limitation of Liability Converse shall indemnify client, its officers, directors, agents or employees from any claim, demand or liability arising from personal injury or property loss or damage caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of Converse Anything to the contrary in the agreement to which these General Conditions are attached or in these General Conditions notwithstanding, Converse's liability shall be limited to the lesser of the fees charged to Client by Converse for the services performed for Client, or the sum of fifty thousand dollars. Client may. at its option, increase the maximum amount for which Converse shalt be liable by payment of an additional fee For the maximum liability sum of one hundred thousand dollars. the additional amount to be paid shall be four percent of the total Converse fee charged hereunder, for the maximum liability sum of one million dollars, the additional amount to be paid shall be five percent of the total Converse fees charged hereunder Client acknowledges that Converse has agreed to charge. Client a reduced fee for services in exchange for the above limitat,cn of liability and that said reduction in fees is consideration for said limitation Client shall defend and save harmless Converse its officers, directors, agents and employees from all liability, claims and demands, including expenses of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees arising from personal injuries, including disease and death, property loss or damage, injury to others (including personnel of Client. Converse or subcontractors performing work hereunder), and ae or ground poli+ion or environmental impairment arising out of or in any manner connected with ot related to the performance cf Converse's services. except where suoh iniur�, ,os.. r damage shall have been caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct c` Converse Client acknowledges that Converse has charged Client a reduced fee for services to be performed by it in exchange for this hold harmless and that the reduction in fees is •consideration for sad hold harmless proviscn Converse will not be Iiatle for ccnsequentrel damages of any kind, nature of description Hazardous Waste, Pollution and Health Hazard Projects ("Hazardous Projects" Herein) Prior to the commencement of services by Converse on any hazardous project. Client agrees to advise Converse in writing if any of said services are to be performed in an area where dust, fumes, gas, noise, vibrations or other particulate ': nonparticutate matter is in the atmosphere where it raises a Potential or possible health hazard or nuisance to anyone working within the area prior to the effective dale of the agreement to which these General eons arc a part, Client represents that it has advised Converse in writing of any known hazardous waste materials existing on or near the Site, said notice containing the identification of any such hazardous waste, the extent and location thereof. Anything in these General Conditions notwithstanding, Client shah indemnify and hold Converse, its officers, directors, agents, servants and employees, harmless from any claim, demand or action brought by any paq whomsoever, including employees of Converse, which claim, demand or action is based upon injury or damage caused or alleged to have been caused by hazardous wastes or hazardous materials whether or not such waste or materials were known to exist prior to the commencement of services Client agrees to be responsible for the removal and disposal of any hazardous waste uncovered as a result of the site investigation, including drilling mud, if any, used in the site investigation which may become contaminated as a result of said investigation. Client's Responsibilities Client shall immediately provide Converse with full information in writing as to Clients requirements for the services to be provided by Converse and shall designate in writing within five (5) days of the effective'date of the agreement to which these General Conduces are a part a representative to act on Client's behalf in conjunction with the services to be provided hereunder Cheat shall promptly review all documents, reports, data and recommendations submitted by Converse and shall communicate with Converse concerning such reviews for the purpose of avoiding delay in The performance of the services to be rendered by Converse - Client shalt notify any third party who may perform on the Site of the standard of care being undertaken by Converse pursuant hereto and of the limitations of liability contained herein Client shall require as a condition to the performance of any such third party a like indemnity and limitation of liability on their part against Converse Confidentiality Converse shall hold all information provided to it by Client and the results of the work performed by !t confidential and shall not disclose the same to any third party except where required by Governmental regulatory agencies or as otherwise required by law Disputes Converse shall have ;he right to bring a legal action In a state or federal court against Client for any sumo due or alleged to be due to er or for services renderer Except on this right. Converse and Client agree that as an express candler, to the cera of either party to bring a legal action against the Meet they shall first submit any dispute tri mediation conducted ,n the following manner. a The patty asserting a claim ('the Claimant') shall, as Cr: absolute condition to the right to proceed further (following the procedure being an absolute ceed:ton to the right to proceed with i tigahon) give to the other party ('the Respondent') written notice of sate claim with n a pence not to exceed thirty (30) .lays from and after first becoming aware of the facts giving rise to said clam Sae rct:ce shall contain at least the following: (i) (2) A statement setting forth with specificity the factsalleged to exist which a contends gee rise to said claim and the documents is that support salt claim. Tee Claimant shall either attach copes at said documents to the notice of claim or provide Respondent with immediate access to the documents for inspection and phatecepying Ti,•e nature, extent and dollar amount of the damages sustained or which claimant believes in geed faith may be sustained (3) The names and addresses of ail individuals who nave any knowledge. of said facts, together with a statement with respect to each such individual of the facts that the individual has knowledge of (4) The name and address of any third parties who have reviewed said claim at the request of the Claimant or anyone acting or. Claimant's behalf b The written notice of claim described in paragraph (a) above shall be given by first class certified or registered mail c. Within forty -fee (45)d s after the Claimant has mailed the notice of Claim to the Respondent as provherein, the Claimant and Respor.dvra shall confer and shall appoint, by mutual agreement a mediator in the every that, for arty teases whatsoever, the Claimant and Respondent cannot select a mutually acceptable mediator, a mediator may be appointed by any court of cornoetent jurisdiction upon' a_piirtslton cf either party. d Within e reasonable period after the appointment of the mediator, but in no event longer than one hundred eighty (1Bell days thereafter, the alleged claim elite! be submitted to mediation under such 'des arid regulations ar the inedialor specify During the mediation, the pales shalt at all lames act in good faith and utilize their best efforts to resolve the dispute that is the subject of met:alien a in the event the disputes not resolved by mediation as proaded herein, and conditioned upon full and goad faith Compliance wife eachof the provisions and procedures specified herein. then and only then the Claimant 'nay file a legal acts^.n in the anise manner and subject to inc same conditions requirements and hmitatiors as if mediation had ret occurred. ti the mediation each part; shall bear Its own attorneys' fees, costs and other oxpensee except that each party shall bc- responsible and pay for one-half Cf the coots and expenses of lie mediator Claviers Con vihurs GCe4 in the event teat ceon s required the prcvatiine party shalt be entitled is recover all of its con s incurred in connection therewith including, without limitation, staff time, court costs, attorneys' fees consultant and expert witness fees and any other related expenses. In this regard, in order to make the prevailing party whole, the parties acknowledge and agree that the prevailing party shall he entitled to recover all of its costs incurred in connection with the legal action and seal not be limited to "reasonable attorneys fees' as defined in any statute or rule of court Jobstte Safety Converse shall be responsible for its activity and that of its employees on the Site. This shall not be construed to relieve the Client its general contractor or any subcontractor of their obligation to maintain a safe jobsife Neither the professional activities nor the presence of Converse or its employees and subcontractors shall be understood to control the operations of others, nor shall it be construed tc be an acceptance of the responsibility for ,obsre safety Converse will not direct. supervise or !ay out the wore of the Client, contractor, or any subcontractors Converses services will not include a review or evaluation of the adequacy of the contractor's safety measures on or near the Site Schedules Unless otherwise specified in the agreement, Converse shalt be obligated to perform within a reasonable period to time. Converse shah not be responstle for delays in the completion of its services created by reason of any unforeseeable cause or causes beyond the control and/or without the fault or negligence of Converse. including but not restricted to acts of God or the public enemy, acts of the Government of the United States or of the several states, or any foreign country. or any of them acting in their sovereign capacity, acts of other contractors with Client. fire, hoods, epidemics, riots, quarantine restrictions sy kes, civil insurrections, freight embargoes, and unusually severe weather Should completion of any portion of the services to be rendered by Converse be delayed beyond the estimated cote of completion for any reason which is beyond the coned cf or witeme default or •nes ge,.rte of Converse, then and in that everil Client and Converse shat mutually agree on the terms and conditions upon which the services may be continued or terminated Invoices Converse she ' sb�mit monYtty pr domes invoiccs In Ghent, and a final bill shall be submitted upon completion et m e services. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of an invoice Client shall pay the felt amount of the invoice If Client detects to all or any eerrion of any invoice., t shall no notify Converse of 'sesame within fifteen (15) days from t. e date of receipt of said imdce and shall pay that porton of the invoice not :n depute. and the paries _Ha'i im:me,datele make every effort to settle the disputed portion cif tee invoice if Client fare to make paymeni within thirty (30) days after receipt of an invoice, then Client seal! pay an addtiixcel rnonihly service charge of one and one-half percent (lee h) all s. ch amounts outstaldiee The additional coarse shall not ape•iv to any .disputed portion of any invoice ie_cfv„ d in favor of Clan! to the event Ci.enl fats to say any undisputed amount to Converse when due, Converse may immediately cease wok tine sad payment together with a service charge at the rale of h A ie per month, an specified above, from the due date has been received yurther Converse may, at 'to sole abort and discret on, refuse to perform any further were irreseectrae of payment from Client in the event Mat e!t or any portion of te'ih % <errce charge provided for herein is _teemed to be an Interest charge den and in Ica e.er;t sad interest charge _hail be imited to the maximum amount legally allowed by law insurance :converse represents that it now carries, and will continue to carry during the term of the contract to which these General Conditions are a pal, Workers Ccr,pensarisn insurance and that. if requested, Converse seall pievtde ._ Chert ter,fcsres as evidence of the aforementioned insurance. Assignments Cl-ent shall of align this contracr Dr any porta thereof to any other person dr entity without the express written cath, nt o. w,uerse Nothtnq contained te this contract or any paid thereof shall be construed to create a right in any ;hind party whomsoever,and nothing harem et - ail inure to tie hereto of any thed par.. Governing Law Ties,. Corers: Ceeeiti ns seal, be governed oiv aed consumed under the iaWS the Salle fit Cnirfoinra Original Message From: Laura Tanaka(Monv.)[mailto:ltanaka@ConverseConsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 4:25 PM To: Sol Blumenfeld Subject: RE: Proposal - Step out Borings (Converse Project No. 05-41-180-00) Sol: Yes, there is a lead issue in the parking lot. I ran a second test on Friday, and just got the results back 30 minutes ago. Honestly, after running the second test, the sample usually comes out "clean" and the issue is closed...that is what I assumed would happen in this case. I was wrong. The soil sample had 5.5 milligrams per liter, which means there is a third test that needs to be run to determine if the soil needs to be treated before disposal or not. Based on this second set of results, I would like to do 3 additional step -outs in the parking lot and test for lead. If you add another $500-$600 to the step -out budget, It should cover the analytical testing. Laura Ta v t 12,a Sevu,ov Ev.vi,vov,vsievt,tflL ScievLtl-st cov,verse CovusuLtawts 0262:J30.1201 See our new Teaming Website http://www.converseassociates.com designed to make it easier and more efficient to build teams providing geotechnical and environmental engineering services. You can become part of a network of highly qualified technical specialists to provide better, more cost-effective solutions to client projects. The information contained in this e-mail message (including attachments) is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message (including attachments) may be work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY BUDGET AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2005-2006 EN No MN MIN NW NO PO mil OW MN Nom 001 Nis NO NM MN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PRELIMINARY BUDGET 2005-2006 J. R. REVICZKY MAYOR PETE TUCKER MAYOR PRO TEMPORE COUNCILMEMBERS SAM Y. EDGERTON MICHAEL KEEGAN ART YOON CITY OFFICIALS ELAINE DOERFLING, CITY CLERK JOHN WORKMAN, CITY TREASURER CITY MANAGER STEPHEN BURRELL FINANCE DIRECTOR VIKI COPELAND NU NM MR Ali MI 2imp imp NO los Ang Alit vs amm in ale TABLE OF CONTENTS Understanding The Budget Organizational Chart Certificate of Award City Manager's Budget Message Budget Summary Revenue by Fund Expenditures by Fund Budget Transfers Pie Chart -Revenue By Source Pie Chart -General Fund Revenue Property Tax Dollar Breakdown Department Requests Personnel Allocation Summary DEPARTMENT BUDGETS Pie Chart -Appropriations Pie Chart -General Fund Appropriations City Council City Attorney City Clerk/Elections City Manager Source Reduction/Recycling Information Systems Prospective Expenditures City Prosecutor City Treasurer Community Development Building Planning Block Grant General Administration Commuter Express Dial -A -Ride Community Resources/Cable TV Recreation Transportation Finance Administration Cashier Bus Pass Subsidy Bayview Drive, Lower Pier Avenue, Myrtle Avenue. Loma Drive, & Beach Drive Administrative Expense Fire Personnel Auto/Property Insurance/Bonds PAGE 1 9 11 15 23 34 35 36 41 43 45 47 67 Personnel (Continued) Emission Control (AQMD) General Appropriations Liability Insurance Unemployment Insurance Workers' Compensation Police Administration C.O.P.S. Program Community Services Crossing Guards Dial -A -Taxi L. A. Impact Autotheft Prevention (TRAP) 71 Public Works 73 Administration 76 Beverage Recycling 79 Building Maintenance 83 Downtown Enhancement 88 Lifeguard Service/Beach Maintenance 90 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 95 Parks Division 100 N. Pier Structure/Parking Lot N 104 County Share of Revenue 108 Sewers and Storm Drains Street Maintenance/Traffic Safety 112 Traffic Safety, Artesia Boulevard 114 Used Oil Block Grant 116 Equipment Service Division 118 Departmental Equipment Replacement 120 Capital Improvement Program 125 Appendix 128 City of Hermosa Beach Facts Revenue History by Fund 132 Revenue Category Detail 134 Expenditure History by Fund 136 Explanation — User Charge Allocations Vehicle Replacement Schedule Computer Replacement Schedule 138 Business Machine Replacement 142 Schedule 150 Glossary 152 Index PAGE 154 156 158 160 162 166 170 172 176 178 180 182 186 188 190 192 194 196 198 200 202 204 206 208 210 213 223 245 246 247 248 249 253 259 265 269 272 MI NM Ilia MI 11111 AIR Nil NO ea BM 11111 SW MIS all MN IS 111111 1111111 UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET BUDGET PROCESS The budget process begins each year in February when Department Heads prepare estimates of revenues and departmental expenditures for submission to the Finance Director. The City Manager and Finance Director meet with each department to review the estimates and discuss requests. From these meetings, the preliminary budget is developed. The Capital Improvement Budget, which is part of the same document, follows the same process. The City Manager is required to submit a preliminary budget to the City Council on or before May 15th of each year. One or two public workshops are held in May and June to review the budget and receive public input. One formal public hearing is held in June, prior to budget adoption. The City Council must adopt an annual budget, by resolution, on or before June 30 for the coming fiscal year (July 1 — June 30). If the budget is not adopted by that date, the preliminary budget, except for capital outlays, goes into effect until the budget is adopted. The budget may be amended during the year as necessary. A Midyear Budget Review is conducted in February, at which time adjustments to revenue estimates and appropriations are made. Expenditures may not exceed appropriations at the fund level. The City Manager may approve transfers of appropriation within funds; transfers of appropriations from one fund to another require City Council approval. Budgets are adopted for all governmental and proprietary funds (see later Explanation of City Funds) on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. BUDGET CONTENT The following areas offer quick insight into the budget. City Manager's Budget Message The City Manager's message presents the highlights and major changes in narrative form. Budget Summaries The Budget Summary contains condensed information on the budget by presenting estimated beginning and ending fund balances and projected revenues and expenditures for each fund. The Schedule of Revenues by Fund and the Schedule of Expenditures by Fund show comparisons between the 2003-04 actuals, the budget and year-end estimate for 2004-05 and the requested amount for 2005-06. Revenue A computerized listing of line items entitled "City of Hermosa Beach, Revenue Detail by Fund, 2005-06 Budget" shows each revenue item, organized by fund. The columns on the report are explained below under "Department Budgets." Personnel Authorizations These pages present a summary of the City's authorized personnel by department and provide quick reference to any new/eliminated positions and the City's total staffing. Department Budgets The Table of Contents lists the pages for all activities separately budgeted. Each Department budget begins with a department description and a summary of personnel positions. A computerized listing of line items is entitled "City of Hermosa Beach, Department Expenditure Detail, 2005-06 Budget 1 HOW TO READ THE REPORTS Numerical columns on the Revenue and Expenditure reports are explained as follows: Column No. 1 - "2003-04" Received/Expended." Reflects actual revenue/expenditures for 2003-04 fiscal year Column No. 2 - "2004-05 Total Budget" Reflects the revised budget amounts through January 31, 2005 Column No. 3 - "2004-05 Received/Expended Year -to -Date" Reflects the actual revenue/expenditures through January 31, 2005 Column No. 4 - "2004-05 Year-end Estimate" Reflects the department's best estimate of what revenue/expenditures will be incurred through year-end, June 30, 2005. Column No. 5 - "2005-06 Department Request" Represents the 2005-06 Budget Request. FINANCIAL POLICIES The City Council has adopted policies for specific funds. The policies are listed here, and again, below with the applicable fund. General Fund - Any funds remaining unspent at year-end in the General Fund transfer equally to the Contingency Fund, Insurance Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund and the Capital Improvement Fund. Contingency Fund — Goal of fund balance equal to 15% of the General Fund appropriations for economic uncertainties, unforeseen emergencies. Insurance Fund — Goal of $3,000,00 in retained earnings for claims reserves and catastrophic losses. Equipment Replacement Fund — Goal of retained earnings equal to the accumulated amount calculated for all equipment, based on replacement cost and useful life of equipment. Compensated Absences Fund — Goal of fund balance equal to 50% funding for accrued liabilities for employee vacation, sick and compensatory time. For 2004-05, a change was made to transfer any funds available at year-end in the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund, Insurance Fund, and Retirement Stabilization Fund. At midyear 2004-05, goals were reviewed and funds in excess of goal amount were reallocated as needed. DEBT SERVICE The City has not chosen to use long-term debt to pay for capital improvement or infrastructure improvement, therefore no debt service is shown in the budget. EXPLANATION OF CITY FUNDS This section explains the funds shown in the Budget Summary. Governments use fund accounting; each fund is considered to function as a separate fiscal and accounting entity. The basis for budgeting in all funds is the same as the fund type basis for accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 2 1 1 t 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - The City uses two fund types to account for governmental -type activity. These are the General Fund and Special Revenue Funds. The accounting basis for these funds is modified accrual, which recognizes revenues when measurable and available and expenditures when the liability is incurred. 001 GENERAL FUND The General Fund is the principal operating fund of the City. The estimated fund balance at 6-30-05 (as presented in the Budget Summary) of $111,831 is designated/reserved as follows: $ 111,831 Affordable Housing Funds collected (conversion fees) for affordable Housing purposes. 50,000 Sunset Concert Series, Centennial Celebration $ 161,831 "Designated" is the accounting term for the more commonly used "earmarked". Reserves, on the other hand, indicate that the funds are not available for appropriation, usually because of a legal restriction or because they represent items such as inventory or fixed assets. Funds available in the General Fund at the end of the fiscal year automatically transfer to the Equipment Replacement Fund, Insurance Fund, Contingency Fund and Capital Improvement Fund (1/4 each). SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - A Special Revenue fund is used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted or earmarked for specific purposes. 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING FUND Funds of the benefit assessment district, created pursuant to Street and Highway Code 22500-22679, are expended for lighting/median maintenance and are accounted for in this fund. 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 117 AB939 FUND City share of state gasoline tax restricted for use on public streets. Restricted Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds from Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) are also held in this fund. Recycling fees generated in connection with solid waste collection are used to implement a Source Reduction and Recycling Element and a Household Waste Element of the general plan. 119 COMPENSATED ABSENCES FUND Funds set aside to provide for liabilities associated with vacation time, sick time, etc. accumulated by employees. These funds are invested but interest is not allocated to this fund. The City Council's adopted funding level for liabilities is 50%. 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 122 TYCO FUND 123 TYCO TIDELANDS FUND Funds generated by passage of the L.A. County Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Act by county voters for the purpose of improving parks and recreational facilities. Interest is not allocated to this fund because City funds are advanced, then reimbursed by this grant. Funds received from an easement granted for construction of a transpacific, submarine fiber optic cable system originating in Japan with a landing in Hermosa Beach. The project will provide additional capacity for global voice and data transmission. Funds set aside according to the Tyco easement agreement to construct one new bathroom and repair three existing bathrooms at the beach. If funds remain, they are to be used for renovations, repair or improvement of the pier or beach. 3 125 PARK RECREATION FACILITY TAX FUND 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND Accumulation of subdivision fees and park, recreation facility tax fees on new dwellings. Generally, the funds are to be used for acquisition, improvement and expansion of park or recreational facilities. Funds cannot be used for maintenance. Funds remaining from 4% Utility User Tax used to purchase 19.5 acres of open space property. Remaining funds will be used for acquisition and maintenance of open space. 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND (Formerly the 6% UUT Fund) This fund is used to provide ongoing funds for maintenance and building improvements. 135 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND 136 LOWER PIER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND This fund temporarily holds funds for payment of administrative expenses for the assessment district. These funds are invested but interest is not allocated to this fund because it is not required by the bond documents. This fund temporarily holds funds for payment of administrative expenses for the assessment district. These funds are invested but interest is not allocated to this fund because it is not required by the bond documents. 137 MYRTLE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND Funds collected from utility undergrounding assessments in the Myrtle Avenue Undergrounding District for administration are deposited in this fund. Costs incurred by the City or its Fiscal Agent in administration of the assessments are paid from these funds. 138 LOMA DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND Funds collected from utility undergrounding assessments in the Loma Drive Undergrounding District for administration are deposited in this fund. Costs incurred by the City or its Fiscal Agent in administration of the assessments are paid from these funds. 139 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND 145 PROPOSITION A FUND This fund temporarily holds funds for payment of administrative expenses for the assessment district. These funds are invested but interest is not allocated to this fund because it is not required by the bond documents. Funds received from participation in the federal block grant program. Projects must be approved by the County Community Development (CDC) Commission. Interest is not allocated to this fund because City funds are advanced, then reimbursed by this grant. Portion of sales tax (currently 1/2%) distributed to cities on a population basis for public transit purposes. 4 146 PROPOSITION C FUND 150 GRANT FUND 152 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND Voter -approved 1/2% sales tax for transit purposes. Funds may be used for street improvements on bus routes. State and federal grants for specific projects are accounted for in this fund. Interest is not allocated to this fund because City funds are advanced, then reimbursed by these grants. Funds collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles and distributed to cities on a population basis for use in reducing air pollution. Funds received from the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) program, established by the State legislature in fiscal year 1996-97, are accounted for in this fund. Funds must be used for front line municipal police services and must supplement and not supplant existing funding. 154 CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT PROGRAM FUND 156 TASKFORCE FOR REGIONAL AUTO THEFT PREVENTION (TRAP) 160 SEWER FUND 170 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND Funds received from the state for the purchase of high technology law enforcement equipment. Funds provided by a $1 fee on vehicle registration implemented by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors for a program to deter, investigate and prosecute vehicle theft in Los Angeles County. Funds derived from a portion of the 6% Utility User Tax and miscellaneous service charges are spent on the Sewer/Storm Drain Department and capital sewer projects. Funds seized as a result of illegal activity and forfeited to the Police Department. Funds must be used for law enforcement purposes to supplement, not replace or decrease existing appropriations. Fire flow fees collected are used to upgrade and enhance the fire flow capabilities of the fire protection system. 198 RETIREMENT STABILIZATION FUND Funds set aside by the City Council for use when retirement rates are unstable and have therefore increased beyond expectations. 199 CONTINGENCY FUND 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND "Rainy day" funds set aside for unforeseen emergencies, unexpected economic events, etc. The City Council adopted goal is 15% of appropriations. Funds set aside for Capital Improvement Projects. 5 302 ARTESIA BOULEVARD RELINQUISHMENT FUND 305 LOWER PIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT FUND Funds received from California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) for relinquishment of the portion of Artesia Boulevard in Hermosa Beach. Proceeds from the sale of bonds for downtown improvements. The bonds are secured by real property in the downtown area and repaid from assessments against the property. The City is not obligated in any way with respect to the bonds. 307 MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING IMPROVEMENT FUND Proceeds from the sale of bonds for utility undergrounding in the Myrtle Avenue District. The bonds are secured by real property in the district and repaid from assessments against the property. The City is not obligated in any way with respect to the bonds. 308 LOMA DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING IMPROVEMENT FUND Proceeds from the sale of bonds for utility undergrounding in the Loma Drive District. The bonds are secured by real property in the district and repaid from assessments against the property. The City is not obligated in any way with respect to the bonds. 309 BAYVIEW DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT FUND Proceeds from the sale of bonds for utility undergrounding in the Bayview Drive District. The bonds are secured by real property in the district and repaid from assessments against the property. The City is not obligated in any way with respect to the bonds. 310 BONNIE BRAE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT FUND Funds advanced by the City for formation costs of a potential utility undergrounding district. If the district residents vote to form the district, funds advanced by the City will be recovered. 311 BEACH DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT FUND Proceeds from the sale of bonds for utility undergrounding in the Beach Drive District. The bonds are secured by real property in the district and repaid from assessments against the property. The City is not obligated in any way with respect to the bonds. 312 PROSPECT DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT FUND Funds advanced by the City for formation costs of a potential utility undergrounding district. If the district residents vote to form the district, funds advanced by the City will be recovered. PROPRIETARY FUNDS - Two fund types are used to account for a government's business -type activities, or those that receive a significant portion of their funding through user charges. These are the Enterprise Fund and the Internal Service Fund. The basis for accounting in these funds is full accrual, which recognizes revenue and expenses as they occur, not when they are received or spent. Fixed assets (land, equipment, etc.) are accounted for in these funds. 6 ENTERPRISE FUNDS - The Enterprise Fund is used to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, or where the governing body has decided that periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, and/or net income is appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability, or other purposes. 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 110 PARKING FUND Funds generated primarily from downtown parking lots and parking structure. Lot management is contracted to a private firm. Funds generated by the parking structure are shared with the County of Los Angeles, which funded the construction of the parking structure. Parking -related revenue and expenses are accounted for in this fund. Excess funds remaining at year-end transfer to the General Fund after parking related costs are paid. The year-end fund balance represents fixed assets, which are not a spendable resource. INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS - The Internal Service Fund is used to allocate the cost of providing certain centralized services among different funds. These funds are invested but interest is not allocated to these funds. 705 INSURANCE FUND The Insurance Fund is an Internal Service Fund which pays all costs of liability, workers' compensation, unemployment, and property insurance with funds generated by service charges to all departments. Service charges are calculated based on separate formulas for each type of insurance. The City Council's goal for retained earnings is $3,000,000. 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND The Equipment Replacement Fund is an Internal Service Fund established to provide ongoing funds to replace assets at the end of the asset's useful life. Vehicles, heavy equipment, computers and business machines are included in the fund. The City Council's goal for retained earnings is the "accumulated amount" calculated and shown in the Equipment Replacement Schedules. FIDUCIARY FUNDS - Governments often hold or manage financial resources in a trustee or agency capacity. A trust or agency fund type is used to account for a government's fiduciary activities. The City's fiduciary funds are all agency funds, with a modified accrual basis of accounting. AGENCY FUNDS - The Agency fund is used in situations where the government plays a limited financial management role on behalf of a third party. 610 LOWER PIER DISTRICT REDEMPTION FUND This fund is used to account for special assessment collections and debt service for the Lower Pier Avenue Assessment District Bonds. 611 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT REDEMPTION FUND This fund is used to account for special assessment collections and debt service for the Beach Drive Assessment District Bonds. 612 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESERVE FUND This fund is used to account for a reserve set aside for the Beach Drive Assessment District Bonds. 7 617 MYRTLE AVENUE ASSESSMENT FUND 618 LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND This fund is used to account for special assessment collections and debt service for the Myrtle Avenue Utility Undergrounding District Bonds. This fund is used to account for special assessment collections and debt service for the Loma Drive Utility Undergrounding District Bonds. 625 OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS POLICE FUND Funds set aside to meet the annual required contribution for Police retiree medical payments. 8 1 1 r 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ELECTORATE CITY CLERK CITY COUNCIL CITY TREASURER PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION CIVIL SERVICE BOARD BOARD OF APPEALS i PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION CITY PROSECUTOR CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY COMMUNITY RESOURCES ti PUBLIC WORKS Parks & recreation/ racilities Management Cultural/ ecreational Athletic Programming Special Events iCable T.V. Liaison 1 1 R s ENGINEERING Plan Checks Field Inspection Code Enforcement Encroachments Capital Improvement TRANSPORTATION Traffic Eng. Traffic Signals Traffic Signage Speed Survey MAINTENANCE Landscaping Irrigation Streets Sewer Storm Drain Building Maint. Vehicle Maint. POLICE Enforcement Investigation Detention Emergency Dispatch Reserves Special Investigations Record Bureau Crossing Guard COMMUNITY SERVICES Parking Enforcement nimal Control Meter Maintenance FIRE i Fire Suppression Fire Prevention Rescue Public Education Paramedics Disaster Preparedness Reserves Plan Checking Ambulance Transportation 9 PERSONNEL/ RISK MANAGEMENT I II PERSONNEL Recruitment Training Labor Relations RISK MGT Workers' Comp Claims Liability Claims City Insurance Secretarial Support FINANCE Budget Accounting Payroll Citation Processing Animal Licenses Parking Permits Business License Bus Passes COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING AND SAFETY Plan Checking Field Inspection Code Enforcement PLANNING Current Planning Advanced Planning Environmental Assessment Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) Enforcement This page intentionally left blank 10 fail Ili. Ns at* um Nit -ills lei sue as asi ems fit in am is, California Society of 4'tunicipal Jinance Officers Certificate of Award Merit in Operational Budgeting 2004 -OS Presented to City of Hermosa Beach This certificate recognizes Meritorious Achievement in Operational Budgeting and reflects a highly professional budget document and the underlying budgeting process through which the budget is implemented. February 24, 2005 AgneS'Walker Chair, Budgeting & Financial Management Dedicated to Excellence in Municipal Financial Management This page intentionally left blank 12 C) am as us no an Ns Elm OW OM VW I MR Mi OR WS I MI This page intentionally left blank 14 Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: May 2005 In accordance with the City Code, I am submitting the FY 2005-06 Combined Operating and Capital Budget for your review and approval Overview This is the first budget prepared following the passage of Proposition 1A which amended the State Constitution to restore predictability and stability to local government budgets. This constitutional amendment protects city revenues from being taken by the state to fund its programs on an ongoing basis. As a result, we have not had to guess which funds and how much the state was going to take from the City. The agreement approved last year between the state and local government does result in a loss of revenue from the City in the amount of $326,000. In accordance with that agreement, these funds will not be taken in the 2006-07 fiscal year and, in fact, the state is supposed to pay back funds that have been taken in prior fiscal years. Overall, the certainty provided by Proposition 1A is a positive development as it allows the City to approve a budget that is based on local revenues to fund local programs. The budget represents the most significant policy document that the City Council makes each year. The budget sets the City's work plan for the coming year, approves service levels for the several operating departments and details the capital investments that the City will make. This budget again reflects a lack of growth in sales tax, which is primarily the result of the loss of the BMW Dealership. This lack of growth will have long-term impact on the operation of the City and services that are provided if it is not replaced either by new businesses or increases in other revenue sources received by the City. A comprehensive review of all user fees that will provide for cost recovery through the various charges for services that the City provides will be presented to the City Council for review and approval. Adjustments to other revenue sources should be considered which could be placed on the November ballot. The two revenue sources that would help make up for the loss of the sales taxes are the business license tax and the transient occupancy tax. Staff will present an updated proposal for your consideration at the budget session. A second significant continuing factor is the increasing cost of funding our retirement programs. This is the second year that we have faced this increased cost and a portion of these costs will be paid for by funds set aside for this purpose. The additional cost for 2005-06 is $1,200,000. Funds do remain in the Retirement Stabilization Fund to cover a portion of the expected costs in the FY2006-07. Hopefully, these costs will start to level off so the level of resources spent for these programs can be shifted to other needs of the City. The budget, as proposed, is balanced and does include an assumption that additional funds will be provided through adjustments to fees and charges as a result of the User Fee Study. $300,000 has been conservatively assumed for budget purposes. 15 Utility undergrounding districts continue to be of interest to residents. The City has advanced funds for engineering on two districts, Bonnie Brae ($76,931) and Prospect ($200,000). We have assumed that the Bonnie Brae District will be approved in 2005-06, with the advance repaid. Prospect will likely be more than one year out before it is approved. The budget also contains a fairly aggressive street improvement program. The proposal contains the largest number of residential street improvements in the last 20 years. This will get us started on a program to really start addressing the condition of our streets. It is also proposed that the Parking Fund be combined with the General Fund. This is consistent with our practice of transferring to the General Fund any excess funds remaining after paying all Parking Fund costs. This would eliminate the need to make this transfer and would present a clearer picture of how General Fund costs are funded. Revenue Trends and Assumptions Since the General Fund pays for the majority of operating expenses, this analysis of revenue and expenditures will focus on that fund. Most of the revenue in the other funds is either grant funds or other one-time funds, which are restricted by use; therefore an overall comparison is not meaningful. General Fund revenue estimates predict an increase of 2% over year-end estimates for 2004-05, in spite of the Toss of our only new car dealership, which was a major sales tax generator. Secured Property Tax The estimate for current year secured property tax revenue assumes an increase of 8%, reflecting continued health in the housing market in the beach area. As is shown by the trend line, property tax continues to be a stable source of revenue for the City, with year-to-year increases averaging 10% over the past five years (excluding funds taken by the State). For the second year, the estimate reflects the take -away of $326,429 as a result of the State budget. Known as ERAF III, the provision shifts $1.3 billion in property taxes from local government to the State for the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) over two fiscal years, 2004-05 and 2005-06. Current year secured property tax represents 30% of total General Fund revenue. Please refer to the Property Tax Dollar Breakdown chart that shows how property tax is distributed among agencies. Property Tax In Lieu of Vehicle License Fees During fiscal year 2003-04, the State dropped the Vehicle License Fee (VLF) from 2% of vehicle value to .67%. Except for the first three months of the year, the State back-filled this fee reduction with other State funds, Secured Property Tax 1994 - 2006 7000000 6000000 5000000 4000000 2000000 1000000 16 keeping local government revenue "whole". The three-month "gap" is supposed to be repaid in August 2006. Beginning in 2004-05, cities continued to receive the .67% portion of the fee directly from the State however they have backfilled the 2% to .67% VLF reduction with an additional allocation of local property tax from County ERAF funds. This is the amount that is identified as Property Tax In -Lieu of Vehicle License Fees in the Revenue Detail by FundReport. In the future, the revenue may be merged with property tax revenue since from 2005-06 on, measurement and growth will be based upon assessed valuation instead of the original VLF valuation. (previous to 2004-05, the VLF revenue appeared in the Intergovernmental/State category of the revenue report under In Lieu Motor Vehicle) Sales Tax Estimated sales tax revenue declines by 19%. The assumption includes loss of the BMW dealership and a conservative estimate of revenue for the Lotus dealership, which remains on a portion of the property. 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 Sales Tax 1994 - 2006 ge. q`' ��1'c143tiq^ yqg qq'laqq�q\gq`b5:5 o'%. o. SI. o� o. �` SI. 444t hsb 4 , ,titi el, bp, Note: For chart presentation purposes, Sales Tax and In Lieu Sales Tax were combined. As in the 2004-05 Budget, you will continue to see a line item entitled "In Lieu Sales Tax" in the revenue accounts. This is the amount of the "Triple Flip" which resulted from the Governor's ballot measure to finance 2002-03 and 2003-04 state budget deficits. Sales tax was taken from local governments to guarantee State debt in order to obtain a more favorable investment category and thereby a lower rate of interest. The funds will be paid back to local governments, using the property tax schedule, which is less advantageous for cities since property tax is paid less often than sales tax. Supposedly, there will be no actual loss to the city of the principal amount; there will be lost investment opportunity however, due to the cash flow impact. Sales tax represents 13% of total General Fund revenue. The State sales tax rate for Los Angeles County is currently 8 1/4%, distributed as follows: 6% State; 1% City of Hermosa Beach (or city point of sale, generally), County Transportation 1/4%, Proposition A Transportation 1/2%, Proposition C Transportation 1/2%. Utility User Tax Utility user tax (UUT), which applies to use of electricity, gas, water, cable, and telecom comprises 15% of General Fund revenue. The tax rate is 6%. $700,000 of the revenue is transferred to the Sewer Fund for sewer operations and maintenance. 17 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 Utilit' User Tax 1994 - 2006 As shown in the chart, revenue has been stable, with the exception of 1999-2000, when long distance and out of state telephone use ceased to be subject to the tax. A conservative increase of 21/2% is estimated for 2005-06. There was tremendous growth from 2002-03 to 2003-04, primarily in the telecommunications portion of the tax. With all of the technological changes in the area of telecommunication, the stability in this portion of the tax may be questionable. To ensure our UUT ordinance keeps pace with these technological changes, an amendment is being drafted and will be brought to the City Council in the near future. 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 Transient Occupancy Tax 1994 - 2006 tet 434. gbggA°A�otio�off'44,c4. tigq� gga�1gq�qq(dqq^1qq� qq°1 p'1op1 'O• p��o��(o Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) The so-called "hotel tax" now represents 8% of General Fund revenue. The 2004-05 and 2005-06 estimates are 12% over 2003-04. Overall occupancy for the first half of 2004-05 is up and revenue is higher by 16%. Expenditures Personnel There are no significant changes proposed in service levels for any of the departments. There are not any new full time positions being proposed. Changes which are included are: • Reclassification of one Assistant Engineer position Associate Engineer • Elimination of the existing Crime Scene Investigator and addition of one Police Service Officer • Elimination of one Recreation Supervisor position • Part time staffing in the City Clerk's office is recommend to increase from 1/2 to % for the Clerk typist position to handle increased activity in providing information to the public • Addition of an intern in Public Works to enter data for the Geographic Information System (GIS) system. Labor negotiations are now underway with all city employee organizations. As negotiations are concluded, adjustments will be made to the respective departments. Lighting/Landscaping District The Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District will not generate enough revenue from the property tax assessment to cover its costs in 2005-06. The City Council has approved a contract with to proceed with a mailed ballot election for this assessment district. The 18 assessment spread and engineers report are being prepared now for a mailed ballot to be completed after the first of the year. The proposal for an increase to cover the cost of district is estimated to be $10.00 or less per year per parcel. Insurance Fund In addition to the normal user charges allocated to each department to fund insurance costs, an additional amount was added to fund future claims liabilities. The General Fund contribution was $50,000, with $7,537 contributed from other funds based on the relative share of overall costs. The Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA), which is the insurance pool to which the city belongs, has been researching ways to reduce the high cost of worker's compensation claims. They have identified two key elements of an effective worker's compensation program as 1) high-quality third party administration services and 2) implementation of a "best practices" model for risk management and safety within each organization. Additional funds have been budgeted to address these areas in an effort to ultimately reduce worker's compensation losses. Capital Improvements In our continuing effort to improve our streets, parks, sewers and buildings, this budget includes a total of $5.6 million in funding for proposed capital projects. The most notable projects (including carry-over projects) are the Pier Phase III and $1.4 million in residential street improvements. The interfund loans, relating to the 2004-05 purchase of the property next to City Hall on 11th Place, reflect in the Budget Summary, with associated lease revenue from the self - storage business on the property, reflected in the Downtown Enhancement Fund. All significant changes in fund balances shown in the Budget Summary are due to capital improvement project expenditures, which is the intended purpose of these funds. There have been no significant changes in the revenue stream for these funds. I would like to thank all the Department Directors for their work and the Finance Department staff and Finance Director, Viki Copeland for putting the budget together. This has been an extremely difficult year to develop a budget to present to the City Council and I really appreciate the extra effort that has been made by all involved. Respectfully submi Stephen R. Burre City Manager 19 This page intentionally left blank 20 Summaries UM S MI - Ile O SO MS O E IS - S - I ME I 1111111 I N op INN 1111 1.0 NM NO NIP IN Ili NMI SI 1111111 INS Me in Ile 111111 IMO This page intentionally left blank 22 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 2005-06 BUDGET LIGHTING DOWNTOWN GENERAL LANDSCAPING ENHANCEMENT PARKING FUND FUND FUND FUND 001 105 109 110 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovemmental/State IntergovemmentaVCounty IntergovemmentaVFederal Current Service Charges Other Revenue User Fee Study $15,633,197 $618,204 $375,000 $314,059 $187,070 $0 $0 $1,479,672 $58,708 $300,000 $454,631 $0 $0 $2,866 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $234,436 $0 $0 $0 $897,312 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,439,026 $10,077 $0 $0 $0 $1,821,130 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $18,965,910 $457,497 $1,131,748 $3,270,233 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $2,549,605 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $21,515,515 $457,497 $1,131,748 $3,270,233 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/05 $189,331 $89,116 $8,264,320 $384,384 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $21,704,846 $546,613 $9,396,068 $3,654,617 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $20,818,715 1 $483,420 $1,067,587 $1,953,148 Capital Outlay $24,300 $0 $0 $15,400 Capital Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $20,843,015 $483,420 $1,067,587 $1,968,548 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $700,000 $9,194 $3,721 $1,315,596 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $21,543,015 $492,614 $1,071,308 $3,284,144 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2 $0 $15,400 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/06 5161,831 (a) $53,999 58,324,760 (b) $385,873 (c)I (a) DESIGNATIONS/RESERVES OF FUND BALANCE: Affordable Housing $111,831 Sunset Concerts, Centennial Celebration $50.000 $161,831 Storage Lot Loan (reduced by lease revenue) (b) Investment In Fixed Assets $10,466,762 $2,558,274 (c) Investment In Fixed Assets $376,281 Reserve $9,592 Available Fund Balance 6/30/06 50 553,999 $416,272 50 1 Funding from 2004-05 Designations - $25,000 AMEX Donation; $2,500 24 Hr Fitness Donation. 2 Reflects increase to fund balance for fixed asset purchases in Enterprise/Intemal Service Funds. 23 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 2005-06 BUDGET COMPENSATED PROP A STATE GAS AB 939 ABSENCES OPEN SPACE TYCO TAX FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND 115 117 119 121 122 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovemmental/State Intergovemmental/County Intergovemmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue User Fee Study $0 $0 $0 $1,294 $378,985 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,233 $0 $0 $0 $64,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 • $0 $0 $0 $369,213 $0 $0 $0 $0 $598,290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $380,279 $75,583 $0 $598,290 $369,213 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $380,279 $75,583 $0 $598,290 $369,213 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/05 $23,061 $303,737 $551,047 $3 $0 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements $403,340 $379,320 $551,047 $598,293 $369,213 $0 $69,974 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $577,733 $38,826 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $10,000 $69,974 $0 $577,733 $38,826 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $368,985 $0 $64,666 $20,557 $175,000 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $378,985 $69,974 $64,666 $598,290 $213,826 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/06 $24,355 (d) $309,346 $486,381 $3 $155,387 (d) RESERVES: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Local $668 Regional $2,992 Available Fund Balance 6/30/06 $20,694 $309,346 $486,381 $3 $155,387 24 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 2005-06 BUDGET BAYVIEW DRIVE PARK/ 4% UTILITY USER DISTRICT TYCO RECREATION TAX RAILROAD BUILDING ADMINISTRATIVE TIDELANDS FACILITY TAX RIGHT OF IMPROVEMENT EXPENSE FUND FUND WAY FUND FUND FUND 123 125 126 127 135 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State IntergovemmentaVCounty Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue User Fee Study $0 $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,979 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,752 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $971 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $0 $82,731 $971 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $0 $82,731 $971 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/05 $258,000 $34,023 $28,918 $4,765 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $258,000 $116,754 $29,889 $4,904 $0 $0 $0 $139 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $139 $3,940 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,940 $0 $0 $0 $139 $3,940 $0 $3,940 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,582 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $106,754 $29,889 $4,904 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 $106,754 $29,889 $4,904 $1,582 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,354 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $0 $106,754 $29,889 $4,904 $3,936 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2 (ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/06 $258,000 $10,000 $0 Available Fund Balance 6/30/06 $258,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $4 25 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 2005-06 BUDGET BEACH DRIVE LOWER PIER MYRTLE DISTRICT LOMA DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE FUND FUND FUND FUND 136 137 138 139 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State Intergovemmental/County Intergovemmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue User Fee Study $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $232 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,976 $9,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $325 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,956 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,942 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $2,976 $9,402 $10,281 $2,942 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $2,976 $9,402 $10,281 $2,942 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/05 $285 $8,784 $11,479 ($106) TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $3,261 $18,186 $21,760 $2,836 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $1,900 $5,850 Capital Outlay $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $1,900 $5,850 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $990 $2,867 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $2,890 $8,717 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/06 $6,300 $1,550 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,300 $1,550 $3,277 $1,001 $9,577 $2,551 $371 $9,469 $12,183 $285 I Available Fund Balance 6/30/06 $371 $9,469 $12,183 $285 26 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 2005-06 BUDGET COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSITION PROPOSITION BLOCK GRANT A C GRANTS FUND FUND FUND FUND 140 145 146 150 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovemmental/State Intergovernmental/County Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue User Fee Study $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,766 $0 $0 $0 $311,578 $236,094 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,581 $31,293 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,555 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,374 $0 $127,000 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $228,766 $332,714 $267,387 $132,374 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $228,766 $332,714 $267,387 $132,374 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/05 $1 $218,559 $1,107,698 $80 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $228,767 $551,273 $1,375,085 $132,454 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $10,700 $199,617 $0 $5,374 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $218,066 $0 $93,000 $127,000 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $228,766 $199,617 $93,000 $132,374 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $228,766 $199,617 $93,000 $132,374 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/06 $351,656 $1,282,085 $80 Available Fund Balance 6/30/06 $1 $351,656 $1,282,085 $80 27 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 2005-06 BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAL CALIFORNIA TASKFORCE FOR AIR QUALITY LAW ENFORCEMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT REG AUTOTHEFT IMPROVEMENT SERVICES EQUIPMENT PROGRAM PREVENTION FUND FUND FUND FUND 152 153 154 156 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State Intergovernmental/County Intergovemmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue User Fee Study $0 $0 $0 $740 $22,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $4,206 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,294 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,531 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $22,740 $104,206 $1,294 $134,531 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $22,740 $104,206 $1,294 $134,531 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/05 $44,695 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $67,435 $18,919 $123,125 $1,118 $0 $2,412 $134,531 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $1,000 $31,500 $0 $134,531 Capital Outlay $0 $38,500 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $1,000 $70,000 $0 $134,531 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $1,000 $70,000 $0 $134,531 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/06 $66,435 $53,125 $2,412 $0 Available Fund Balance 6/30/06 $66,435 $53,125 $2,412 $0 28 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 2005-06 BUDGET ASSET FIRE RETIREMENT SEWER FORFEITURE PROTECTION STABILIZATION FUND FUND FUND FUND 160 170 180 198 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovemmental/State Intergovemmental/County Intergovemmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue User Fee Study $0 $0 $0 $42,712 $6,088 $3,000 $0 $33,740 $9,750 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 $3,050 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,077 $0 $0 $0 $0 $87,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,579 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $95,290 $9,050 $98,037 $26,579 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $700,000 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $795,290 $9,050 $98,037 $26,579 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/05 $427,619 $14,755 $93,407 $1,833,676 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $1,222,909 $23,805 $191,444 $1,860,255 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $639,275 $20,000 $0 $0 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $436,000 $0 $25,400 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $1,075,275 $20,000 $25,400 $0 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $156,397 $600,000 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $1,075,275 $20,000 $181,797 $600,000 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/06 $147,634 $3,805 $9,647 $1,260,255 Available Fund Balance 6/30/06 $147,634 $3,805 $9,647 $1,260,255 29 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 2005-06 BUDGET LOWER PIER MYRTLE UTILITY CAPITAL ARTESIA BLVD AVENUE UNDERGROUND CONTINGENCY IMPROVEMENT RELINQUISHMENT IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND 199 301 302 305 307 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovemmental/State Intergovemmental/County Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue User Fee Study $0 $0 $0 $60,296 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $73,358 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,039 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,265 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $138 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $60,296 $73,358 $16,039 $2,265 $138 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $60,296 $248,358 $16,039 $2,265 $138 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/05 $2,710,918 $3,245,278 $375,354 $72,425 $4,677 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $2,771,214 $3,493,636 $391,393 $74,690 $4,815 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $3,291,902 $387,393 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 $3,291,902 $391,393 $0 $0 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $0 $3,291,902 $391,393 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/06 $2,771,214 $201,734 (e) $0 $74,690 $4,815 Storage Lot Loan (reduced by lease revenue) ($684,391) (e) RESERVES: Advance to Utility Districts $200,000 Available Fund Balance 6/30/06 $2,086,823 $1,734 $0 $74,690 $4,815 30 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 2005-06 BUDGET BAYVIEW DRIVE BONNIE BRAE BEACH DRIVE LOMA UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUNDING UNDERGROUNDING UNDERGROUNDING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUND FUND FUND FUND 308 309 310 311 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State Intergovemmental/County Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue User Fee Study $0 $0 $0 $3,189 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,530 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $3,189 $1,530 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $3,189 $1,530 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/05 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,173 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,173 $0 $4,173 $102,799 $202,769 $0 $2,204 $105,988 $204,299 $0 $6,377 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 $0 $0 $0 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OU $0 $0 $0 $0 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/06 $105,988 $204,299 $0 $6,377 I Available Fund Balance 6/30/06 $105,988 $204,299 $0 $6,377 `Fund shows $0 balance because the assumption is that the district will be formed in 2005-06 with the advance repaid to the Capital Improvement Fund. Actual costs for the district are not known at this time. 31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 2005-06 BUDGET BEACH DRIVE BEACH DRIVE PROSPECT LOWER PIER ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT MYRTLE UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT AVENUE DISTRICT REDEMPTION REDEMPTION RESERVE ASSESSMENT FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND 312 610 611 612 617 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State Intergovernmental/County IntergovemmentaUFederal Current Service Charges Other Revenue User Fee Study $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $325 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $417 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,345 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $0 $325 $417 $93 $1,345 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $0 $325 $417 $93 $1,345 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/05 ($200,000) $4,972 $293 $87 $17,643 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE ($200,000) $5,297 $710 $180 $18,988 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/06 ($200,000) $5,297 $710 $180 $18,988 Available Fund Balance 6/30/06 ($200,000) $5,297 $710 $180 $18,988 32 1 1 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 2005-06 BUDGET OTHER POST LOMA EMPLOYMENT DRIVE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT POLICE INSURANCE FUND FUND FUND 618 625 705 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TOTAL FUND (MEMORANDUM 715 ONLY) ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovemmental/State Intergovemmental/County Intergovemmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue User Fee Study TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/05 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2 'ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/06 $0 $0 $0 $1,066 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,066 $0 $1,066 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,863 $242,463 $15,929 $242,463 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,659,134 $0 $0 $1,659,134 $0 $1,659,134 $2,723,352 $4,382,486 $1,601,597 $0 $0 $1,601,597 $0 $1,601,597 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,277,494 $31,000 $0 $1,308,494 $0 $1,308,494 $4,396,217 $5,704,711 $1,266,352 $300,364 $241,000 $1,807,716 $0 $1,807,716 $592,164 $16,742,500 $618,204 $1,820,026 $1,243,590 $599,517 $735,821 $355,766 $7,246,387 $285,154 $300,000 $29,946,965 $3,424,605 $33,371,570 $27,827,985 $61,199,558 $28,323,973 $378,564 $5,587,867 $34,290,403 $3,424,605 $37,715,008 $607,564 $15,929 $363,656 (f) $2,780,889 (g) $4,489,159 $24,213,307 Storage Lot Loan (reduced by lease revenue) (f) Includes contribution from General Fund for Police Retiree medical (shown as expenditure in the General Fund) ($937,391) (g) Investment In Fixed Assets $2,924,423 ($937,392) Available Fund Balance 6/30/06 $15,929 $363,656 $1,843,498 $627,344 $10,069,857 33 SCHEDULE OF REVENUE BY FUND 2003-04 2004-05 Year End Actual Estimate 2005-06 Increase Percent Budget (Decrease) Change General Fund Property Taxes Sales & Use Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Business License Tax Utility Users Tax Other Taxes Licenses & Permits Fines & Forfeitures Use of Property & Money Other Governments Service Charges Other Revenue $5,885,480 2,759,037 1,291,689 693,865 2,652,821 757,794 664,169 365,811 381,714 959,110 1,321,295 532,178 $7,090,036 2,692,137 1,450,000 690,000 2,780,000 767,000 625,528 460,000 305,657 182,606 1,420,712 203,886 $7,573,866 2,293,831 1,450,000 690,000 2,849,500 776,000 618,204 375,000 314,059 187,070 1,779,672 58,708 $483,830 6.82% (398,306) -14.80% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 69,500 2.50% 9,000 1.17% (7,324) -1.17% (85,000) -18.48% 8,402 2.75% 4,464 2.44% 358,960 25.27% (145,178) -71.21% Total General Fund Lighting & Landscaping Fund Downtown Enhancement Fund Parking Fund State Gas Tax Fund AB 939 Fund Prop A Open Space Fund Tyco Fund Parks/Rec Facility Tax Fund UUT Railroad Right of Way Fund Building Improvement Fund Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund Lower Pier District Administrative Expense Fund Myrtle District Administrative Expense Fund Loma District Administrative Expense Fund Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Exp Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Prop A Transit Fund Prop C Fund Grant Fund Office of Traffic Safety Grant Fund Air Quality Improvement Fund Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund California Law Enforcement Equipment Program Taskforce for Reg Authotheft Prevention Fund Sewer Fund Asset Seizure/Forfeiture Fund Fire Protection Fund Retirement Stabilization Fund Contingency Fund Capital Improvement Fund Artesia Boulevard Relinquishment Fund Lower Pier Avenue Improvement Fund Myrtle Utility Underground Improvement Fund Loma Utility Underground Improvement Fund Bayview Dr Util Undrgmdng Dist Imp Fund Beach Dr Assessment Improvmnt Fund Lower Pier District Redemption Fund Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund Myrtle Avenue Assessment Fund Loma Drive Assessment Fund Insurance Fund * Equipment Replacement Fund * $18,264,963 $18,667,562 $18,965,910 $298,348 1.60% $456,230 953,438 2,904,002 361,801 68,131 20,558 316,079 71,537 11,865 95 0 2,807 9,290 10,189 0 579,429 327,911 240,428 89,448 15,440 22,828 102,956 1,073 112,102 141,472 9,459 98,750 4,467 59,857 43,658 11,541 1,539 223 2,239 0 12,000 450 0 0 2,309 1,592 1,444,455 1,168,050 $457,834 1,987,325 3,224,228 417,078 75,889 1,564,567 663,437 80,595 892 126 0 2,889 9,140 9,991 2,870 66,088 330,577 255,479 635,469 711,845 22,716 103,866 1,118 123,293 118,452 8,760 92,305 26,902 65,263 69,584 14,798 2,099 132 2,951 1,088,269 492,573 330 293 87 1,260 981 1,520,790 1,132,536 $457,497 1,131,748 3,270,233 380,279 75,583 598,290 369,213 82,731 971 139 3,940 2,976 9,402 10,281 2,942 228,766 332,714 267,387 132,374 0 22,740 104,206 1,294 134,531 95,290 9,050 98,037 26,579 60,296 73,358 16,039 2,265 138 3,189 1,530 4,173 325 417 93 1,345 1,066 1,659,134 1,308,494 ($337) -0.07% (855,577) -43.05% 46,005 1.43% (36,799) -8.82% (306) -0.40% (966,277) -61.76% (294,224) -44.35% 2,136 2.65% 79 8.86% 13 10.32% 3,940 87 3.01% 262 2.87% 290 2.90% 72 2.51% 162,678 246.15% 2,137 0.65% 11,908 4.66% (503,095) -79.17% (711,845) -100.00% 24 0.11% 340 0.33% 176 15.74% 11,238 9.11% (23,162) -19.55% 290 3.31% 5,732 6.21% (323) -1.20% (4,967) -7.61% 3,774 5.42% 1,241 8.39% 166 7.91% 6 4.55% 238 8.07% (1,086,739) -99.86% (488,400) -99.15% (5) -1.52% 124 42.32% 6 6.90% 85 6.75% 85 8.66% 138,344 9.10% 175,958 15.54% Grand Total $27,944,661 $34,053,239 $29,946,965 ($4,106,274) -12.06% * Insurance Fund and Equipment Replacement Fund are interna service charges in individual departments where applicable. See Appendix for General Fund revenue account detail by category. I service funds 34 . Revenue in these funds appear as 1 1 SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES BY FUND 2004-05 2003-04 Year End 2005-06 Increase Percent Actual Estimate Budget (Decrease) Change General Fund City Council City Attorney City Clerk/Elections City Manager Prospective Expenditures City Prosecutor City Treasurer Community Development $163,277 160,693 210,421 269,987 0 130,270 87,877 $170,329 110,000 188,291 275,285 61,227 145,540 95,352 $174,260 160,000 277,348 309,945 753,688 151,522 102,758 $3,931 50,000 89,057 34,660 692,461 5,982 7,406 2.31% 45.45% 47.30% 12.59% 1130.97% 4.11% 7.77% Building & Safety 690,388 652,214 755,467 103,253 15.83% Planning 387,066 489,763 579,754 89,991 18.37% Community Resources/Cable TV 933,837 861,294 1,039,316 178,022 20.67% Finance Administration 565,882 601,204 626,930 25,726 4.28% Fire Department 3,558,105 4,111,315 4,473,599 362,284 8.81% General Appropriations 62,040 67,707 79,198 11,491 16.97% Personnel 228,097 232,462 270,957 38,495 16.56% Police 6,735,345 7,196,792 8,390,020 1,193,228 16.58% Crossing Guards 60,842 62,210 63,760 1,550 2.49% Public Works Administration 372,658 Building Maintenance 424,845 Parks 585,650 Street Maintenance/Traffic Safety 714,047 Capital Improvement Projects 137,264 Total General Fund $16,478,591 Lighting & Landscaping Fund $519,525 Downtown Enhancement Fund 939,576 Parking Fund 1,632,092 State Gas Tax Fund 0 AB 939 Fund 122,222 Prop A Open Space Fund 0 Tyco Fund 30,614 Tyco Tidelands Fund 0 Parks/Rec Facility Tax Fund 0 UUT Railroad Right of Way Fund 0 Building Improvement Fund 0 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 0 Lower Pier Administrative Expense Fund 1,762 Myrtle District Administrative Expense Fund 4,099 Loma District Administrative Expense Fund 4,458 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 0 Community Development Block Grant Fund 329,895 Prop A Transit Fund 310,116 Prop C Fund 48,119 Grant Fund 83,688 Office of Traffic Safety Grant Fund 15,439 Air Quality Improvement Fund 730 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund 95,681 Califomia Law Enforcement Equipment Progran 8,439 Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prevention Fund 112,102 Sewer Fund 1,753,046 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 16,000 Fire Protection Fund 79,873 Capital Improvement Fund 758,119 Artesia Boulevard Relinquishment Fund 0 Myrtle Utility Underground Improvement Fund 5,439 Bayview Dr Utility Underground Dist 8,000 Bonnie Brae Utility Underground Dist 0 Beach Dr Utility Underground Dist 15,276 Prospect Utility Underground Dist 200,000 Insurance Fund 2,151,551 Equipment Replacement Fund 975,015 443,015 469,257 550,531 800,746 307,347 $17,891,881 $554,901 $5,234,029 1,733,971 46,699 124,680 1,544,010 2,481,740 542,000 245,000 0 0 0 1,851 5,600 5,900 1,477 66,088 264,386 60,000 651,812 711,845 750 174,147 35,862 123,293 1,658,800 125,415 213,736 1,117,177 157,705 0 845,000 26,931 460,869 0 1,533,698 1,852,113 592,004 544,521 646,878 851,090 0 $20,843,015 $483,420 $1,067,587 1,968,548 10,000 69,974 577,733 38,826 0 106,754 29,889 4,904 1,582 1,900 5,850 6,300 1,550 228,766 199,617 93,000 132,374 0 1,000 70,000 0 134,531 1,075,275 20,000 25,400 3,291,902 391,393 0 0 0 0 0 1,601,597 1,807,716 148,989 75,264 96,347 50,344 (307,347) $2,951,134 ($71,481) (4,166,442) 234,577 (36,699) (54,706) (966,277) (2,442,914) (542,000) (138,246) 29,889 4,904 1,582 49 250 400 73 162,678 (64,769) 33,000 (519,438) (711,845) 250 (104,147) (35,862) 11,238 (583,525) (188,336) 2,174,725 233,688 0 (845,000) (26,931) (460,869) 0 67,899 ($44,397) 33.63% 16.04% 17.50% 6.29% -100.00% 16.49% -12.88% -79.60% 13.53% 0.00% -43.88% 0.00% -98.44% -100.00% -56.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 2.65% 4.46% 6.78% 4.94% 246.15% -24.50% 55.00% -79.69% -100.00% 33.33% -59.80% -100.00% 9.11% -35.18% 0.00% -88.12% 194.66% 0.00% 0.00% -100.00% 0.00% -100.00% 0.00% 4.43% -2.40% Grand Total $26,699,467 $40,493,366 $34,290,403 ($6,097,548) -15.06% 35 BUDGET TRANSFERS 2005-06 BUDGET TRANSFERS IN GENERAL FUND From Lighting/Landscaping Fund, Administration $9,194 From Downtown Enhancement Fund, Administration $3,721 From Parking Fund, Unused Fund Balance $1,315,596 From State Gas Tax Fund, Street Maintenance, Traffic Safety Operations $368,985 From Compensated Absences Fund, Retirement Payoffs $64,666 From Prop A Open Space Fund, Parks Maintenance Allocation $20,557 From Fire Protection Fund, Fire Equipment Replacement Charges $156,397 From Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund, Agency Administration $990 From Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund, Agency Administration $2,867 From Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund, Agency Administration $3,277 From Beach Drive Assessment Dist Admin Exp Fund, Agency Administration $1,001 From Bayview Drive Admin Exp Fund, Agency Administration $2,354 From Retirement Stabilization Fund, Y2 of 05-06 Increase $600,000 To Sewer Fund, Improvements FUND TOTALS $2,549,605 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING FUND To General Fund, Administration FUND TOTALS DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND To General Fund, Administration FUND TOTALS PARKING FUND To General Fund, Unused Fund Balance FUND TOTALS $0 TRANSFERS OUT $700,000 $700,000 $9,194 $9,194 $3,721 $3,721 $1,315,596 $0 $1,315,596 STATE GAS TAX FUND To General Fund, Street Maintenance, Traffic Safety Operations $368,985 FUND TOTALS $0 $368,985 COMPENSATED ABSENCES FUND To General Fund, Retirement Payoffs FUND TOTALS PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND To General Fund, Parks Maintenance Allocation FUND TOTALS $64,666 $0 $64,666 $20,557 $0 $20,557 TYCO FUND To Capital Improvement Fund, Street Improvements $175,000 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE FUND To General Fund, Agency Administration FUND TOTALS 36 $0 $175,000 $2,354 $2,354 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BUDGET TRANSFERS 2005-06 BUDGET TRANSFERS IN TRANSFERS OUT LOWER PIER ADMIN EXPENSE FUND To General Fund, Agency Administration $990 FUND TOTALS $0 $990 MYRTLE DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE FUND To General Fund, Agency Administration $2,867 FUND TOTALS $0 $2,867 LOMA DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE FUND To General Fund, Agency Administration $3,277 FUND TOTALS $0 $3,277 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND To General Fund, Agency Administration $1,001 FUND TOTALS $0 $1,001 SEWER FUND From General Fund, Improvements $700,000 FUND TOTALS $700,000 $0 RETIREMENT STABILIZATION FUND To General Fund, 1/2 of 2005-06 Increase $600,000 FUND TOTALS $0 $600,000 FIRE PROTECTION FUND To General Fund, Fire Equipment Replacement Charges $156,397 FUND TOTALS $0 $156,397 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND From Tyco Fund, Street Improvements $175,000 FUND TOTALS $175,000 $0 GRAND TOTALS 37 $3,424,605 $3,424,605 This page intentionally left blank 38 Revenue MN H N S MS MI M i IN i MI- UN N- E S M r CD M NO MI i M- 1111- ! V NO MN NM MO -- - E M M This page intentionally left blank 40 MS- a- - 11- w i=- I- I- a- M This page intentionally left blank 42 11111 M E- M. M-- -- N OM MO 1 0 M i NM 0 w /PERMITS OTHER REV USE/MONEY,PROP PROP TAX IN LIEU OF VL FINES SVC CHRGS This page intentionally left blank 44 THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROPERTY TAX DOLLAR BREAKDOWN * *Source: HdL, Coren and Cone $0.278 Los Angeles County General $0.204 City Hermosa Beach Tax District 1 $0.160 Educational Augmentation Fund Impound $0.084 Education Revenue Augumentation Fund $0.054 Hermosa Beach City School District $0.053 Redondo Beach Unified School District $0.028 Development Center Handicapped -Redondo Beach $0.027 El Camino Community College District $0.026 Manhattan Beach Unified School District $0.021 L A County Library - $0.0141 Development Center Handicapped -Manhattan Beach $0.0120 South Bay Cities Sanitation District Operations $0.0086 L A County Flood Control Maintenance - $0.0086 County School Services Fund Hermosa Beach - $0.0083 South Bay Hospital District - $0.0064 L A County Fire - FFW - $0.0026 Children's Institutional Tuition Fund - $0.0015- L A County Flood Control Imp. Dist. Main. - $0.0013 County School Services Fund Hermosa Beach - $0.0009 Development Center Handicapped Minors Hermosa Beach - $0.0002 L A County West Mosquito Abatement District - $0.0002 Water Replenishment District of Southern California - $0.0001 L A County Accumulative Cap Outlay $1.000 This page intentionally left blank 46 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 001 General Fund City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 5,153,719 5,301,834 2,684,511 5,301,834 5,752,095 450,261 3102 Current Year Unsecured 335,663 331,587 246,190 331,587 331,587 0 3103 Prior Year Collections 140,296 112,000 54,132 112,000 112,000 0 3106 Supplemental Roll SB813 255,802 256,000 209,009. 300,000 250,000 (50,000) 3107 Transfer Tax 243,390 245,000 141,618 245,000 245,000 0 3108 Sales Tax 2,596,135 1,730,327 1,152,381 2,020,121 1,592,873 (427,248) 3104 In -Lieu Sales Tax* 0 576,776 310,253 502,016 530,958 28,942 3109 1/2 Cent Sales Tx Ext 162,902 167,249 70,881 170,000 170,000 0 3110 Cable TV Franchise 228,532 228,000 38,391 235,000 235,000 0 3111 Electric Franchise 61,043 61,000 0 63,000 65,000 2,000 3112 Gas Franchise 49,789 49,000 0 49,000 56,000 7,000 3113 Refuse Franchise 175,040 175,000 89,714 175,000 175,000 0 3114 Transient Occupancy Tax 1,291,689 1,400,000 740,355 1,450,000 1,450,000 0 3115 Business License 693,865 682,000 356,512 690,000 690,000 0 3120 Utility User Tax 2,652,821 2,700,000 1,352,266 2,780,000 2,849,500 69,500 3122 Property Tax In -Lieu of Vehicle License Fees 0 1,044,615 522,308 1,044,615 1,128,184 83,569 Total Taxes 14.040.686 15.060.388 7.968.521 15.469.173 15.633.197 164.024 3200 Licenses And Permits 3202 Dog Licenses 9,218 9,000 8,029 9,000 9,000 0 3203 Bicycle Licenses 0 50 21 50 50 0 3204 Building Permits 375,016 267,400 207,572 347,620 340,272 (7,348) 3205 Electric Permits 62,159 56,000 25,486 56,000 56,000 0 3206 Plumbing Permits 40,602 40,250 25,466 40,250 40,250 0 3207 Occupancy Permits 7,350 7,400 4,445 7,200 7,200 0 3209 Garage Sales 78 50 27 50 50 0 3211 Banner Permits 3,776 5,000 2,387 4,000 4,000 0 3212 Animal/Fowl Permits 118 100 0 0 0 0 3213 Animal Redemption Fee 1,941 1,400 877 1,400 1,400 0 3214 Amplified Sound Permit 1,170 1,000 542. 1,000 1,000 0 3215 Temporary Sign Permit 874 912 466 912 936 24 3217 Open Fire Permit 530 320 320 320 320 0 3218 Auto Repair Permit 5,402 2,183 1,845 2,183 2,183 0 3219 Newsrack Permits 1,935 1,543 1,224 1,543 1,543 0 3225 Taxicab Franchise Fees 154,000 154,000 0 154,000 154,000 0 Total Licenses And Permits 664.169 546.608 278.707 625.528 618.204 (7.324) 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3301 Municipal Court Fines 365,811 425,000 279,044 460,000 375,000 (85,000) Total Fines & Forfeitures 365.811 425.000 279.044 460.000 375.000 (85.000) *In -Lieu Sales Tax represents the triple flip reduction of Sales Tax by the State that will be paid back via the Property tax schedule. It has been moved out of numeric sequence for presentation purposes. 47 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3402 Rents & Concessions 3403 Pier Revenue 3404 Community Center Leases 3405 Community Center Rentals 3406 Community Center Theatre 3411 Other Facilities 3412 Tennis Courts 3418 Special Events 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 68,445 44,315 17,456 46,051 54,155 8,104 I 29 0 0 0 0 0 1,070 1,070 534 1,070 1,070 0 64,951 64,000 39,557 64,000 64,000 0' 74,267 65,000 49,813 65,000 65,000 0 78,868 55,000 43,759 55,000 55,000 0 12,600 10,000 6,287 10,000 10,000 0 II 19,090 20,000 11,347 15,000 15,000 0 64,731 50,000 42,644 50,000 50,000 0 0 65 12 73 149 76 (2,337) (519) (395) (537) (315) 222 i Total Use Of Money & Property 381,714 308,931 211,014 305,657 314,059 8,402 3500 Interaovernmental/State 3504 In Lieu Off Highway 563 563 672 672 672 0 3505 In Lieu Motor Vehicle 883,625 94,941 86,430 94,941 94,941 0 3507 Highway Maintenance 1,864 1,864 0 1,864 1,864 0 I 3508 Mandated Costs 729 729 729 729 729 0 lif 3509 Homeowner Property Tax Relief 69,994 74,400 37,212 74,400 78,864 4,464 3510 POST 2,335 10,000 6,434 10,000 10,000 0 I Total Intergovernmental/State 959,110 182,497 131,477 182,606 187,070 4,464 3800 Current Service Charges 3801 Residential Inspection 17,750 15,000 9,913 15,000 15,600 600 3802 Sign Review 2,678 2,060 1,062 2,060 2,140 80 3803 Environmental Impact 754 2,737 1,955 2,737 782 (1,955) 3805 Conditional Use Permit Amendment 2,863 2,454 1,724 2,454 2,544 90 3806 Board Of Appeals 191 0 0 0 0 0 3807 Refuse Lien Fees/Consolidated 572 451 3,113 451 451 0 3808 Zone Variance Review 4,720 4,720 3,584 4,720 4,896 176 I 3809 Tentative Map Review 1,175 1,175 0 1,175 1,218 43 3810 Final Map Review 3,444 5,740 2,373 5,740 4,768 (972), 3811 Zone Change/Gen Plan Amendment 3,064 15,890 12,712 15,890 3,178 (12,712) 3812 Conditional Use Review 28,536 34,511 22,598 34,511 29,385 (5,126) 3813 Plan Check Fees 282,577 237,450 205,434. 237,450 240,677 3,227 3814 Planning/Zoning Appeal 618 618 428 618 642 24 I 3815 Public Works Services 25,048 14,000 24,417 40,000 35,000 (5,000) 3818 Police Services 2,369 4,000 3,140 4,000 4,000 0 3819 Jail Services 17,539 20,000 10,465 18,000 18,000 0 I 3823 Special Event Security/Police 42,880 40,000 21,519 40,000 40,000 0 3825 Public Notice Posting 34 51 36 51 54 3 3827 Library Grounds Maintenance 8,912 9,357 9,358 9,358 9,826 468 1 48 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 3831 Street Cut Inspection 43,106 44,000 27,729 44,000 44,000 0 3833 Recreation Service Charges 4,998 6,000 4,264 6,000 6,000 0 3834 Encroachment Permit 118,735 174,794 120,725 174,794 175,000 206 3837 Retumed Check Charge 1,070 1,000 400 1,000 1,000 0 3838 Sale Of Maps/Publications 187 200 176 200 200 0 3839 Photocopy Charges 1,003 1,000 538 1,000 1,000 0 3840 Ambulance Transport 171,069 204,000 134,470 204,000 204,000 0 3841 Police Towing 43,200 38,000 23,593 40,000 40,000 0 3852 Recreation Program Transaction Fee 0 0 0 0 82,000 82,000 3857 Parking Plan Application 5,875 122 122 122 4,872 4,750 3859 Refuse Lien Fee/B.F.I. 0 0 (1) 0 0 0 3862 Alarm Permit Fee 760 800 418 800 800 0 3863 False Alarm Fee 0 300 0 300 300 0 3866 Nonconforming Remodels 10,272 6,848 1,776 6,848 7,104 256 3867 Precise Development Plans 35,088 29,240 28,480 39,092 33,352 (5,740) 3868 Public Noticing/300 Ft Radius 22,190 27,896 21,022 27,896 27,896 0 3870 Legal Determination Hearing 1,274 3,916 3,916 3,916 1,321 (2,595) 3878 Reinspection Fee 672 224 0 224 224 0 3881 Roller Hockey Rink Rental Insurance 15 0 0 0 0 0 3882 Spec Event Security/Fire 2,784 2,536 2,536 2,536 2,536 0 3883 Final/Tentative Map Extension 861 585 883 883 894 11 3887 Voluntary Lot Merger 0 408 0 408 424 16 3888 Planning Commission Appeals 3,376 2,532 1,314 2,532 2,628 96 3890 300 Ft Radius Noticing/Appeal to CC 1,956 3,740 2,704 3,740 3,740 0 3893 Contract Recreation Classes 326,584 346,250 204,021 343,750 345,000 1,250 3894 Other Recreation Programs 80,196 82,000 63,494 82,000 82,000 0 3896 Mailing Fee 10 0 2 0 0 0 3897 Admin Fee/TULIP Ins Certificate 290 290 378 220 220 0 3899 C.U.P. Minor Amendment 0 236 0 236 0 (236) User Fee Study 0 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 Total Current Service Charaes 1.321.295 1.387.131 976.791 1.420.712 1.779.672 358.960 3900 Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 183 500 139 500 500 0 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 27,753 495 495 523 0 (523) 3903 Contributions Non Govt 79,114 111,369 101,369 111,619 24,000 (87,619) 3904 General Miscellaneous 74,922 49,255 51,165 57,036 0 (57,036) 3909 Late Fee 303 100 59 100 100 0 3920 BCHD Healthy Cities Fund 0 21,840 0 21,840 21,840 0 3935 Use Of PERS Excess Assets 328,319 0 0 0 0 0 3945 In-Sery Firefighter Tmg Prog/EI Camino 21,584 12,268 0 12,268 12,268 0 Total Other Revenue 532.178 195.827 153.227 203.886 58.708 (145.178) General Fund 18,264,963 18,106,382 9,998,781 18,667,562 18,965,910 298,348 49 105 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 3103 Prior Year Collections 3105 Assessment Rebates Total Taxes 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property 3900 Other Revenue City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase I Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) I 449,934 450,631 227,602 450,631 450,631 0 I 6,196 6,000 4,823 6,000 6,000 0 (2,018) (2,000) (541) (2,000) (2,000) 0 i 454.112 454.631 231.884 454.631 454.631 0 2,711 3,151 1,704 3,222 2,875 (347) I 0 4 1 4 8 4 (124) (20) (15) (23) (17) 6 2,587 3,135 1,690 3,203 2,866 (337; II 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years (469) 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Revenue (469) 0 0 0 0 0 Lighting/Landscaping District Fund 456,230 457,766 233,574 457,834 457,497 (337) I 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 18,386 25,916 10,279 17,232 13,168 (4,064) 3420 Other Interest Income 15,898 14,100 9,028 12,838 0 (12,838) 3425 Ground Lease 21,000 21,000 12,250 21,000 21,525 525 I 3427 Cell Site License 10,000 24,000 16,112 24,481 25,419 938 3431 Storage Facility Operating Lease 0 0 0 14,319 174,407 160,088 3450 Investment Discount 0 43 11 42 75 33 3475 Investment Premium (765) (201) (127) (199) (158) 41 Total Use Of Money & Property 64,519 84,858 47,553 89,713 234,436 144,723 3800 Current Service Charges 3815 Public Works Services 5,350 3,900 2,675 5,300 5,300 0 3844 LotA Revenue 252,483 256,591 147,097 252,142 252,142 0 3846 North Pier Parking Structure Revenue 621,662 642,511 369,549 639,870 639,870 0 Total Current Service Charges 879,495 903,002 519,321 897,312 897,312 0 3900 Other RevenueI 3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 (1,000,000) 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years (576) 0 0 0 0 0 3903 Contributions Non Govt 10,000 300 300 300 0 (300) I Total Other Revenue 9,424 300 300 1,000,300 0 (1,000,300) Downtown Enhancement Fund 953,438 988,160 567,174 1,987,325 1,131,748 (855,577) I 50 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 110 Parking Fund 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3302 Court Fines/Parking Total Fines & Forfeitures 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property 3800 Current Service Charges 3842 Parking Meters 3843 Parking Permits/Annual 3844 Daily Parking Permits 3848 Driveway Permits 3849 Guest Permits 3850 Contractors Permits 3851 Cash Key Revenue Total Current Service Charges City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 1,244,636 1,337,204 787,233 1,391,615 1,439,026 47,411 1,244,636 1,337,204 787,233 1,391,615 1,439,026 47,411 5,570 10,802 4,208 9,546 10,108 562 0 18 4 15 28 13 (254) (84) (51) (78) (59) 19 5,316 10,736 4,161 9,483 10,077 594 1,322,387 1,490,000 818,632 1,490,000 1,490,000 0 306,765 305,000 24,867 310,000 310,000 0 996 700 396 900 900 0 590 400 376 500 500 0 2,106 1,900 1,045 1,730 1,730 0 12,879 13,000 9,791 15,000 13,000 (2,000) 4,785 4,700 3,230 5,000 5,000 0 1,650,508 1,815,700 858,337 1,823,130 1,821,130 (2,000) 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 3,469 0 0 0 0 0 3904 General Miscellaneous 73 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Revenue 115 State Gas Tax Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium 3,542 0 0 0 0 0 Parking Fund 2,904,002 3,163,640 1,649,731 3,224,228 3,270,233 46,005 Total Use Of Money & Property 3500 Intergovemmental/State 3501 Section 2106 Allocation 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 3512 Section 2105 (Prop 111) 3522 TDA Article 3/Local Total Intergovemmental/State 234 1,492 713 1,398 1,298 (100) 0 2 1 2 4 2 (50) (7) (3) (6) (8) (2) 184 1,487 711 1,394 1,294 (100) 75,632 76,257 38,923 77,225 77,225 0 161,136 158,646 83,165 165,000 165,000 0 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 0 120,849 118,248 62,034 122,760 122,760 0 0 46,699 41,769 46,699 10,000 (36,699) 361,617 403,850 229,891 415,684 378,985 (36,699) State Gas Tax Fund 361,801 405,337 230,602 417,078 380,279 (36,799) 51 117 AB939 Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 1 1 1 9,394 10,993 4,538 10,486 11,267 781 I 0 18 5 18 31 13 (367) (83) (53) (83) (65) 18 I 9,027 10,928 4,490 10,421 11,233 812 3500 Intergovemmental/State 3563 CA Cons Corp/Recycle Lid Grant Reimb 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 (5,000) Total Intergovernmental/State 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 (5,000) 3800 Current Service Charges 1 3860 AB939 Surcharge 59,104 59,020 30,069 60,468 64,350 3,882 Total Current Service Charges 59,10459,020 30,069 60,468 64,350 3,882 I AB939 Fund 68,131 74,948 39,559 75,889 75,583 (306) 121 Prop A Open Space Fund 3600 Intergovernmental/County 3606 LA Co Parks/Pier Renovation 58D8-03-0856 0 221,743 0 1,544,010 577,733 (966,277) 3608 Maintenance Allocation 20,558 20,557 1 20,557 20,557 0 Total Intergovernmental/County 20,558 242,300 1 1,564,567 598,290 (966,277) II Prop A Open Space Fund 20,558 242,300 1 1,564,567 598,290 (966,277) I' 122 Tyco Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 1 3401 Interest Income 42,898 66,556 27,158 63,806 69,410 5,604 3426 Easement Agreement 275,000 600,000 450,000 600,000 300,000 (300,000) II 3450 Investment Discount 0 108 28 101 177 76 ii 3475 Investment Premium (1,819) (486) (301) (470) (374) 96 Total Use Of Money & Property 316,079 666,178 476,885 663,437 369,213 (294,224) Tyco Fund 316,079 666,178 476,885 663,437 369,213 (294,224) 52 1 1 1 a t 1 1 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 3100 Taxes 3116 Parks & Recreation Facility Tax Total Taxes 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 7,000 7,000 3,500 7,000 7,000 0 7,000 7,000 3,500 7,000 7,000 0 4,183 6,838 2,832 6,529 7,001 472 0 11 3 11 19 8 (210) (49) (31) (49) (41) 8 3,973 6,800 2,804 6,491 6,979 488 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 405 0 0 0 0 0 3910 Park/Recreation In Lieu Fee 60,159 67,104 48,239 67,104 68,752 1,648 Total Other Revenue 60,564 67,104 48,239 67,104 68,752 1,648 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 71,537 80,904 54,543 80,595 82,731 2,136 126 4% Utility Users Tax Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property 751 941 384 898 974 76 0 1 0 1 3 2 (60) (7) (4) (7) (6) 1 691 935 380 892 971 79 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 11,174 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Revenue 11,174 0 0 0 0 0 4% Utility Users Tax Fund 11,865 935 380 892 971 79 127 Building Improvement Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property Building Improvement Fund 100 137 54 126 139 13 (5) 0 0 0 0 0 95 137 54 126 139 13 95 137 54 126 139 13 53 1 City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase I Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 135 Bayview Drive District Administrative Expense Fund 3900 Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 3925 Spec Assessment Admin Fees 0 0 0 0 3,940 3,940 II Total Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 3,940 3,940 • Bayview Drive District Administrative Expense Fund 0 0 0 0 3,940 3,940 136 Lower Pier Administrative Expense Fund 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 2,807 2,889 2,889 2,889 2,976 87 Total Other Revenue 2,807 2,889 2,889 2,889 2,976 87 Lower Pier Administrative Expense Fund 2,807 2,889 2,889 2,889 2,976 87 137 Myrtle District Administrative Expense Fund I 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 207 227 115. 237 232 (5) t Total Use Of Money & Property 207 227 115 237 232 (5) 1 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 9,083 8,903 8,903 8,903 9,170 267 Total Other Revenue 9,083 8,903 8,903 8,903 9,170 267 Myrtle District Administrative Expense Fund 9,290 9,130 9,018 9,140 9,402 262 138 Loma District Administrative Expense Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 269 185 154 325 325 0 Total Use Of Money & Property 269 185 154 325 325 0 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 9,920 9,802 9,666 9,666 9,956 290 Total Other Revenue 9,920 9,802 9,666 9,666 9,956 290 Loma District Administrative Expense Fund 10,189 9,987 9,820 9,991 10,281 290 54 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 r 1 r 1 1 1 1 City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 139 Beach Drive Assessment District Administrative Expense Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Total Use Of Money & Property 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees Total Other Revenue Beach Drive Assessment District Administrative Expense Fund 140 Community Development Block Grant Fund 0 14 14 14 0 (14) 0 14 14 14 0 (14) 0 2,856 2,856 2,856 2,942 86 0 2,856 2,856 2,856 2,942 86 0 2,870 2,870 2,870 2,942 72 3700 Intergovemmental/Federal 3715 CDBG Administration 11,602 11,300 4,794 11,300 10,700 (600) 3720 Americans with Disabilities Act 249,534 0 (293) 0 0 0 3722 Community Center Theatre Phase I & II 318,293 0 0 0 0 0 3723 Community Center Theatre/Phase III -V 0 148,222 2,865 54,788 218,066 163,278 Total Intergovemmental/Federal 579,429 159,522 7,366 66,088 228,766 162,678 Community Development Block Grant Fund 579,429 159,522 7,366 66,088 228,766 162,678 145 Proposition A Fund 3100 Taxes 3117 Proposition A Transit 266,321 276,022 157,626 276,022 284,643 8,621 3121 Subregional Incentives 42,718 34,182 0 34,182 26,935 (7,247) Total Taxes 309,039 310,204 157,626 310,204 311,578 1,374 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property 4,656 7,482 3,253 7,268 7,604 336 0 12 3 12 21 9 (168) (55) (36) (56) (44) 12 4,488 7,439 3,220 7,224 7,581 357 3800 Current Service Charges 3853 Dial -A -Taxi Program 4,056 4,000 2,880 5,300 5,300 0 3854 Fares, Dial -A -Ride 9,981 6,694 0 6,694 7,100 406 3855 Bus Passes 347 600 477 1,155 1,155 0 Total Current Service Charges 14,384 11,294 3,357 13,149 13,555 406 Proposition A Fund 327,911 328,937 164,203 330,577 332,714 2,137 55 146 Proposition C Fund 3100 Taxes 3118 Proposition C Local Return Total Taxes City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 1 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase I Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 221,735 226,492 130,730 226,492 236,094 9,602 221,735 226,492 130,730 226,492 236,094 9,602 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 19,464 30,310 12,587 29,161 31,390 2,229 3450 Investment Discount 0 49 13 49 86 37 3475 Investment Premium (771) (222) (140) (223) (183) 40 Total Use Of Money & Property 18,693 30,137 12,460 28,987 31,293 2,306 Proposition C Fund 240,428 256,629 143,190 255,479 267,387 11,908 150 Grants Fund 1 1 r 1 3500 I ntergovemmental/State 3529 Wildlife Conservation Grant 0 324,000 0 324,000 0 (324,000) I 3543 Per Capita Grant 0 220,000 0 220,000 0 (220,000) 3544 Roberti-Z'Berg Grant 0 51,991 0 51,991 0 (51,991) 3558 Beverage Recycling Grant 5,406 5,374 5,374 5,374 5,374 0 3562 State Homeland Security Grant Program 24,892 0 0 0 0 0 3564 State Homeland Security Grant 2004 0 34,104 0 34,104 0 (34,104) Total Intergovernmental/State 30,298 635,469 5,374 635,469 5,374 (630,095) 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal 3732 STPL Street Improvement Reimb 0 0 0 0 127,000 127,000 3738 Local Law Enf Block Grant Prog-LLEBG 11,450 0 0 0 0 0 3739 Assistance to Firefighters Fed Grant 47,700 0 0 0 0 0 Total Intergovernmental/Federal 59,150 0 0 0 127,000 127,000 Grants Fund 89,448 635,469 5,374 635,469 132,374 (503,095) I 151 Office of Traffic Safety Grant Fund 3500 Intergovernmental/State I 3560 Be Street Smart Hermosa Grant 15,440 0 0 0 0 0 3565 Ticket Writer/Traffic Mgmt Grant 0 711,845 0 711,845 0 (711,845) 111 Total Intergovernmental/State 15,440 711,845 0 711,845 0 (711,845) Office of Traffic Safety Grant Fund 15,440 711,845 0 711,845 0 (711,845) I 56 152 Air Quality Management District Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 175 744 327 719 742 23 0 1 0 1 2 1 (9) (4) (2) (4) (4) 0 Total Use Of Money & Property 166 741 325 716 740 24 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3538 AQMD Emission Control AB2766 22,662 22,000 5,911 22,000 22,000 0 Total Intergovernmental/State 22,662 22,000 5,911 22,000 22,000 0 Air Quality Management District Fund 22,828 22,741 6,236 22,716 22,740 24 153 Supp Law Enf Sery Fund (SLESF) 3100 Taxes 3135 C.O.P.S. Allocation 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 Total Taxes 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 3,089 3,968 1,658 3,886 4,219 333 0 7 2 7 12 5 (133) (26) (16) (27) (25) 2 Total Use Of Money & Property 2,956 3,949 1,644 3,866 4,206 340 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) 102,956 103,949 101,644 103,866 104,206 340 154 California Law Enforcement Equipment Program Fund (CLEEP) 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,121 1,221 442 1,127 1,298 171 3450 Investment Discount 0 2 0 1 4 3 3475 Investment Premium (48) (11) (7) (10) (8) 2 Total Use Of Money & Property 1,073 1,212 435 1,118 1,294 176 California Law Enforcement 0 0 0 0 0 0 Equipment Program Fund (CLEEP) 1,073 1,212 435 1,118 1,294 176 57 City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 156 Taskforce for Regional Autotheft Prevention (TRAP) 3600 Intergovernmental/County 3620 T.R.A.P. Taskforce Reimbursement Total Intergovemmental/County 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years Total Other Revenue Taskforce for Regional Autotheft Prevention (TRAP) 160 Sewer Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property 112,199 123,293 30,086 123,293 134,531 11,238 112,199 123,293 30,086 123,293 134,531 11,238 (97) (97) 0 0 0 0 0 112,102 123,293 30,086 123,293 134,531 11,238 34,781 41,521 16,981 39,602 42,843 3,241 0 67 18 66 118 52 (1,869) (310) (196) (309) (249) 60 32,912 41,278 16,803 39,359 42,712 3,353 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3550 CA Waste Oil Recycling Grant 4,908 5,400 810 5,400 6,088 688 Total Intergovemmental/State 4,908 5,400 810 5,400 6,088 688 I, 3600 Intergovernmental/County 3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance 2,804 3,000 0 6,500 3,000 (3,500) 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total Intergovemmental/County 2,804 3,000 0 6,500 3,000 (3,500) 3800 Current Service Charges 3828 Sewer Connection Fee 14,212 41,312 35,061 41,312 13,740 (27,572) 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 10,123 11,000 6,697 11,000 11,000 0 II3832 Sewer Lateral Installation 9,932 9,000 4,682 9,000 9,000 0 Total Current Service Charges 34,267 61,312 46,440 61,312 33,740 (27,572) 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 59,295 0 0 0 0 0 3904 General Miscellaneous (2,890) 0 0 0 0 0 3917 Adopt -A -Storm Drain Donation 10,176 9,536 1,805 5,881 9,750 3,869 i Total Other Revenue 66,581 9,536 1,805 5,881 9,750 3,869 la Sewer Fund 141,472 120,526 65,858 118,452 95,290 (23,162) 1 58 170 Asset Seizure/Forfeiture Fund City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3304 State Forfeited Funds 1,037 400 192 1,000 1,000 0 3307 Department of Justice Forfeited Funds 4,954 3,000 1,545. 5,000 5,000 0 Total Fines & Forfeitures 5,991 3,400 1,737 6,000 6,000 0 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3,632 3,001 1,164 2,780 3,060 280 3450 Investment Discount 0 5 1 4 8 4 3475 Investment Premium (164) (25) (16) (24) (18) 6 Total Use Of Money & Property 3,468 2,981 1,149 2,760 3,050 290 Asset Seizure/Forfeiture Fund 9,459 6,381 2,886 8,760 9,050 290 180 Fire Protection Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 9,986 9,948 4,021 9,358 10,108 750 3450 Investment Discount 0 16 4 15 28 13 3475 Investment Premium (438) (79) (50) (77) (59) 18 Total Use Of Money & Property 9,548 9,885 3,975 9,296 10,077 781 3900 Other Revenue 3912 Fire Flow Fee 89,202 83,009 57,998 83,009 87,960 4,951 Total Other Revenue 89,202 83,009 57,998 83,009 87,960 4,951 Fire Protection Fund 98,750 92,894 61,973 92,305 98,037 5,732 198 Retirement Stabilization Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 4,570 27,726 12,952 27,030 26,661 (369) 3450 Investment Discount 0 42 14 43 73 30 3475 Investment Premium (103) (167) (101) (171) (155) 16 Total Use Of Money & Property 4,467 27,601 12,865 26,902 26,579 (323) Retirement Stabilization Fund 4,467 27,601 12,865 26,902 26,579 (323) 59 199 Contingency Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 1 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase I Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 1 62,425 81,954 33,764 65,738 60,555 (5,183)# 0 130 35 133 233 100 (2,568) (611) (387) (608) (492) 116 59,857 81,473 33,412 65,263 60,296 (4,967)1 Contingency Fund 59,857 81,473 33,412 65,263 60,296 (4,967)1 301 Capital Improvement Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property1 3401 Interest Income 45,599 72,136 31,125 69,977 73,584 3,607 3450 Investment Discount 0 113 33 117 202 85 3475 Investment Premium (1,941) (502) (315) (510) (428) 82 I Total Use Of Money & Property 43,658 71,747 30,843 69,584 73,358 3,774 Capital Improvement Fund 43,658 71,747 30,843 69,584 73,358 3,774 # 302 Artesia Boulevard Relinquishment Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property I 3401 Interest Income 12,048 15,800 6,396 14,891 16,089 1,198 3450 Investment Discount 0 26 7 25 44 19 3475 Investment Premium (507) (120) (76) (118) (94) 24 Total Use Of Money & Property 11,541 15,706 6,327 14,798 16,039 1,241 Artesia Boulevard Relinquishment Fund 11,541 15,706 6,327 14,798 16,039 1,241 305 Lower Pier Assessment District Improvement Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,608 2,219 911 2,111 2,272 161 3450 Investment Discount 0 4 1 4 6 2 11 3475 Investment Premium (69) (16) (10) (16) (13) 3 1 Total Use Of Money & Property 1,539 2,207 902 2,099 2,265 166 Lower Pier Assessment District Improvement Fund 1,539 2,207 902 2,099 2,265 .166 60 City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 307 Myrtle Utility Underground Improvement Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3475 Investment Premium Total Use Of Money & Property 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years Total Other Revenue Myrtle Utility Underground Improvement Fund 308 Loma Utility Underground Improvement Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3450 Investment Discount 3475 Investment Premium 105 143 59 132 139 7 (7) (1) 0 0 (1) (1) 98 142 59 132 138 6 125 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 223 142 59 132 138 6 2,336 3,116 1,280 2,969 3,199 230 O 5 1 5 9 4 (97) (23) (15) (23) (19) 4 Total Use Of Money & Property 2,239 3,098 1,266 2,951 3,189 238 Loma Utility Underground Improvement Fund 2,239 3,098 1,266 2,951 3,189 238 309 Bayview Drive Utility Undergrounding District Improvement Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Total Use Of Money & Property 3900 Other Revenue 3936 Contrib From Property Owners 3940 Cash Pmts/Util Undergrounding Total Other Revenue Bayview Drive Utility Undergrounding District Improvement Fund O 0 0 808 1,530 722 O 0 0 808 1,530 722 O 0 0 921,444 0 (921,444) O 0 52,617 166,017 0 (166,017) 0 0 52,617 1,087,461 0 (1,087,461) O 0 52,617 1,088,269 1,530 (1,086,739) 61 City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 311 Beach Drive Assessment District Improvement Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0 0 0 2,203 4,173 1,970 Total Use Of Money & Property 0 0 0 2,203 4,173 1,970 3900 Other Revenue 3936 Contrib From Property Owners 0 401,341 401,341 401,341 0 (401,341) 3940 Cash Pmts/Util Undergrounding 12,000 89,029 89,029 89,029 0 (89,029) Total Other Revenue 12,000 490,370 490,370 490,370 0 (490,370) 1 Beach Drive Assessment District Improvement Fund 12,000 490,370 490,370 492,573 4,173 (488,400) I 610 Lower Pier District Redemption Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 450 298 159 330 325 (5) 111 Total Use Of Money & Property 450 298 159 330 325 (5) Lower Pier District Redemption Fund 450 298 159 330 325 (5) II 611 Beach Drive Assessment District Redemption Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0 268 73 293 417 124 i Total Use Of Money & Property 0 268 73 293 417 124 Beach Drive Assessment District Redemption Fund 0 268 73 293 417 124 612 Beach Drive Assessment District Reserve Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0 94 38 87 93 6 Total Use Of Money & Property 0 94 38 87 93 6 1 Beach Drive Assessment 111 District Reserve Fund 0 94 38 87 93 6 617 Myrtle Avenue Assessment Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Total Use Of Money & Property 1,490 1,329 550 1,260 1,345 85 1,490 1,329 550 1,260 1,345 85 3900 Other Revenue 3904 General Miscellaneous 819 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Revenue 819 0 0 0 0 0 Myrtle Avenue Assessment Fund 2,309 1,329 550 1,260 1,345 85 62 618 Loma Drive Assessment Fund 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income City of Hermosa Beach Revenue Detail by Fund 2005-06 Budget 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 Increase Received Budget YTD (Jan) Estimate Request (Decrease) 1,592 1,030 418 981 1,066 85 Total Use Of Money & Property 1,592 1,030 418 981 1,066 85 Loma Drive Assessment Fund 1,592 1,030 418 981 1,066 85 705 Insurance Fund 3800 Current Service Charges 3880 Insurance Service Charges 1,412,810 1,450,152 845,922 1,450,152 1,659,134 208,982 Total Current Service Charges 1,412,810 1,450,152 845,922 1,450,152 1,659,134 208,982 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 30,420 0 70,638 70,638 0 (70,638) 3904 General Miscellaneous 1,225 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Revenue 31,645 0 70,638 70,638 0 (70,638) Insurance Fund 1,444,455 1,450,152 916,560 1,520,790 1,659,134 138,344 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 3800 Current Service Charges 3885 Computer/Business Machine Charges 3889 Equipment Replacement Charges Total Current Service Charges 483,259 478,904 279,356 478,904 533,996 55,092 682,252 621,382 362,474 621,382 743,498 122,116 1,165,511 1,100,286 641,830. 1,100,286 1,277,494 177,208 3900 Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 0 25,000 10,373 25,000 16,000 (9,000) 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 2,539 0 0 0 0 0 3903 Contributions Non Govt 0 7,250 3,250 7,250 15,000 7,750 Total Other Revenue 2,539 32,250 13,623 32,250 31,000 (1,250) Equipment Replacement Fund 1,168,050 1,132,536 655,453 1,132,536 1,308,494 175,958 Grand Total 27,944,661 30,053,012 16,067,044 34,053,239 29,946,965 (4,106,274) 63 This page intentionally left blank 64 Personnel Allocation Summary -- —— S-- 01111 11111 M In— N— 1101 N I NS MN PERSONNEL ALLOCATION SUMMARY This page intentionally left blank 66 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PERSONNEL ALLOCATION SUMMARY AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED 03-04 04-05 05-06 Elected 7.00 7.00 7.00 Permanent 140.70 139.70 138.64 Part-Time/Temporary 20.00 18.50 19.50 Police Reserves 20.00 0.00 0.00 Fire Reserves 26.00 26.00 26.00 TOTAL 213.70 192.20 191.14 POSITION CONTROL SUMMARY TOTALS BY MAJOR DEPARTMENT DESIGNATION The following is a departmental comparison of personnel authorizations for fiscal year 2005-06 and prior fiscal years 2003-04 and 2004-05. A separate column indicates increases and/or decreases. The figures below do not include elected, contract or part-time/temporary positions. DEPARTMENT FY 2005/06 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 DECREASE/ AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED INCREASE City Manager 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 City Treas 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 urer City Clerk 1.50 1.50 1.75 0.25 Personnel/Risk Management 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 Finance 10.50 10.50 10.50 0.00 General Appropriations 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Fire 21.00 21.00 21.00 0.00 Police/Community Services 63.00 63.00 63.00 0.00 Community Resources 5.00 5.00 3.69 -1.31 Public Works 22.20 21.20 21.20 0.00 Community Development 10.00 10.00 10.00 0.00 TOTAL 140.70 139.70 138.64 -1.06 67 This page intentionally left blank 68 Department Budgets IMO MI E- OM i MI I ma am es = ■r I- +M r OM A DEPARTMENT BUDGETS This page intentionally left blank 70 — r r NO aa r Ur r r as es r r or se on — Or r APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNCTION 2005-06 BUDGET LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC WORKS This page intentionally left blank 72 NM i- M MN OM- E NO IN O MI OM IS NO UN MN MI MI W GENERAL FUND - WHERE THE MONEY IS SPENT This page intentionally left blank 74 COUNCIL U) N - N MI M r- IS UM UM OW OM -- Ir - S S WI- CITY COUNCIL DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The City Council consists of five citizens elected at large. The Mayor is appointed from the group. The City Council's responsibilities are: to establish City-wide policy; secure revenues and adopt an annual budget; appoint members of various City Commissions and Boards; rule on such matters as prescribed by the laws of the State of California and the City of Hermosa Beach. The Council meets the second and fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:10 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. POSITION SUMMARY OBJECT CODES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Secretary to the City Manager TOTAL 4112 PART-TIME/TEMPORARY City Councilmember TOTAL GRAND TOTAL CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.50 5.50 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Holiday Decorations Installation/Removal $1,960 Holiday Flags 840 Unspecified Services 1,300 4319 Special Events Total $4,100 Employee/Commission Holiday Party Engraving Services/Plaques Donations E Newsletter Unspecified Events Total $4,000 600 2,900 3,500 1,000 $12,000 76 001 General Fund 1101 City Council 1101-4100 1101-4102 1101-4111 1101-4112 1101-4180 1101-4188 1101-4189 Personal Services Regular Salaries Accrual Cash In Part Time/Temporary Retirement Employee Benefits Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 1101-4200 Contract Services 1101-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 1101-4300 1101-4304 1101-4305 1101-4309 1101-4315 1101-4317 1101-4319 1101-4396 Materials/Supplies/Other Telephone Office Oper Supplies Maintenance Materials Membership Conference/Training Special Events Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2003-04 Expended 2004-05 Total Budget 2004-05 Expended YTD (Thru Jan) 2004-05 Year End Estimate 2005-06 Department Request 29,646 30,684 17,899 30,684 30,684 74 527 922 527 573 39,063 39,000 22,750 39,000 39,000 3,573 5,545 3,235 5,545 10,923 35,824 39,085 21,695 34,594 40,707 1,002 1,010 604 1,010 1,020 109,182 115,851 67,105 111,360 122,907 3,867 15,255 1,460 11,645 4,100 3,867 15,255 1,460 11,645 4,100 66 175 92 175 175 6,787 4,925 4,000 4,925 5,000 0 400 0 0 0 18,337 18,000 17,551 20,000 20,000 2,882 4,000 1,530 4,000 4,000 16,213 12,000 9,242 12,000 12,000 5,943 6,224 3,633 6,224 6,078 50,228 45,724 36,048 47,324 47,253 Total City Council 163,277 176,830 104,613 170,329 174,260 77 This page intentionally left blank 78 IMO w MI MS I— all r ON r— ON —— Mr MI r— 11111 — CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The City Attorney functions as legal counsel for civil matters, providing legal advice to the City Council and operating departments. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Attorney Services $160,000 80 001 General Fund 1131 City Attorney 1131-4200 Contract Services 1131-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 160,693 160,000 56,922 110,000 160,000 160,693 160,000 56,922 110,000 160,000 Total City Attorney 160,693 160,000 56,922 110,000 160,000 81 This page intentionally left blank 82 CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION & RECORDS/ELECTIONS SOURCE OF FUND: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The City Clerk is the custodian of City records and keeper of the City Seal. Among statutory duties are: conducting elections; recording proceedings of Council meetings; publishing and posting legal notices; maintaining City Code books; serving as filing officer for City (Conflict of Interest forms and campaign statements); and serving as Fair Political Practices Commission filing official. The City Clerk is charged with conducting all City elections, including the processing of initiative, referendum and recall petitions. In consolidated municipal elections, the City Clerk coordinates with the County and is responsible for performing the tasks associated with candidates and ballot measures, which include publishing required notices and processing nomination papers, candidate statements, ballot arguments and rebuttals, financial statements, campaign expenditure statements, and other related matters. OBJECT CODES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Deputy City Clerk Clerk Typist TOTAL 4112 PART-TIME/TEMPORARY City Clerk TOTAL GRAND TOTAL POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.75 1.50 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 2.75 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private State Code Supplements/Reprints $3,000 Codemaster Updates 1,600 Election Consultant 500 Off-site Microfilm Storage 200 LaserFiche Computer Technical Support and Upgrades 1,200 Phone Maintenance 49 Total $6,549 4251 Contract Services, Government Los Angeles County Cost, General Election $50,000 4323 Public Noticing Legal Advertisements for Public Hearings (Council and Commissions), Bid Requests, And Other Required Noticing $12,500 84 001 General Fund 1121 City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1121-4100 Personal Services 1121-4102 Regular Salaries 76,099 78,840 45,989 78,840 89,650 1121-4111 Accrual Cash In 1,723 4,394 2,711 4,394 4,774 1121-4112 Part Time/Temporary 32,832 28,608 16,128 28,608 33,972 1121-4180 Retirement 7,771 12,236 7,074 12,128 26,317 1121-4188 Employee Benefits 17,924 19,572 10,866 18,734 20,265 1121-4189 Medicare Benefits 1,603 1,559 941 1,613 1,863 Total Personal Services 137,952 145,209 83,709 144,317 176,841 1121-4200 Contract Services 1121-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4,208 6,546 1,002 6,546 6,549 1121-4251 Contract Services/Govt 25,369 0 0 0 50,000 Total Contract Services 29,577 6,546 1,002 6,546 56,549 1121-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1121-4304 Telephone 305 300 178 300 300 1121-4305 Office Oper Supplies 4,580 3,900 2,933 3,900 5,500 1121-4315 Membership 380 410 357 410 410 1121-4317 Conference/Training 1,466 2,025 1,552 2,025 3,325 1121-4323 Public Noticing 12,442 10,500 4,814 10,500 12,500 1121-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 18,676 14,740 8,596 14,740 16,623 1121-4396 Insurance User Charges 4,831 5,053 2,947 5,053 5,300 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 42,680 36,928 21,377 36,928 43,958 1121-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1121-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 212 500 0 500 0 Total Equipment/Furniture 212 500 0 500 0 City Clerk 210,421 189,183 106,088 188,291 277,348 85 This page intentionally left blank 86 ti 00 11111 11111 N 1111 MN 11101 N 11111 11111 MISI In NI 11111 E En NM Ma MI NI CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The City Manager is appointed by the City Council and is the Chief Executive of City operations. His major responsibilities are: to manage all municipal activities; advise the City Council on the City's financial and capital improvement needs; enforce all laws and ordinances; manage the City's properties; appoint department heads and classified civil service employees; represent management in employer-employee relations; and coordinate intergovernmental relations. POSITION SUMMARY OBJECT CODES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES City Manager Secretary to the City Manager TOTAL CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 0.93 0.93 0.43 0.43 1.36 1.36 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Special Services — Undetermined Phone Maintenance Total $2,285 215 $2,500 88 001 General Fund 1201 City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1201-4100 Personal Services 1201-4102 Regular Salaries 181,340 184,240 105,394 184,240 188,123 1201-4111 Accrual Cash In 19,752 17,927 793 17,927 19,477 1201-4180 Retirement 13,164 20,113 11,632 20,113 40,955 1201-4188 Employee Benefits 24,006 23,003 11,438 21,950 25,500 1201-4189 Medicare Benefits 2,940 2,683 1,546 2,644 3,011 Total Personal Services 241,202 247,966 130,803 246,874 277,066 1201-4200 Contract Services 1201-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 770 2,500 205 1,000 2,500 770 2,500 205 1,000 2,500 1201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1201-4304 Telephone 840 1,000 390 800 1,000 1201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 838 1,000 541 1,000 1,000 1201-4315 Membership 1,254 1,400 1,383 1,383 1,500 1201-4317 Conference/Training 2,739 4,500 3,644 4,400 5,000 1201-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 13,467 10,815 6,307 10,815 12,369 1201-4396 Insurance User Charges 8,877 9,013 5,257 9,013 9,510 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 28,015 27,728 17,522 27,411 30,379 Total City Manager 269,987 278,194 148,530 275,285 309,945 89 CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: AB939 FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Funds collected in connection with solid waste collection are used to implement the Source Reduction and Recycling Element in accordance with AB939. OBJECT CODES 4102 POSITION SUMMARY REGULAR SALARIES City Manager Secretary to the City Manager Community Development Director TOTAL CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.18 0.18 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private EXPLANATION Preparation, Annual Compliance Report Consulting Services, Compliance Issues Total $15,000 15,000 $30,000 90 117 AB939 Fund 5301 Source Reduction/Recycle Element City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget • 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 5301-4100 Personal Services 5301-4102 Regular Salaries 20,172 20,416 12,146 20,416 21,459 5301-4111 Accrual Cash In 1,710 1,845 625 1,845 2,005 5301-4180 Retirement 1,491 2,258 1,370 2,258 4,682 5301-4188 Employee Benefits 2,774 2,730 1,436 2,630 2,922 5301-4189 Medicare Benefits 324 297 190 314 341 Total Personal Services 26,471 27,546 15,767 27,463 31,409 5301-4200 Contract Services 5301-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 10,000 21,050 0 58,251 30,000 10,000 21,050 0 58,251 30,000 5301-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 5301-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0 887 0 887 1,665 5301-4315 Membership 0 3,500 0 3,500 5,400 5301-4317 Training/Conference 0 613 612 612 1,500 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0 5,000 612 4,999 8,565 5301-5400 Equipment/Furniture 5301-5499 Non -Capitalized Assets 85,751 40,000 33,967 33,967 0 Total Equipment/Furniture 85,751 40,000 33,967 33,967 0 Total Source Redctn/Recycle Element 122,222 93,596 50,346 124,680 69,974 91 This page intentionally left blank 92 INFORMATION SYSTEMS This page left intentionally blank 94 1 CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT IINFORMATION SYSTEMS DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENTFUND I 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Information Systems is responsible for the City's data processing needs such as: computer equipment, software applications, hardware equipment, personal computers, training, telephone 111 data lines, support services for hardware and software. POSITION SUMMARY I CITY MANAGER OBJECT AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED CODES 04-05 05-06 t4102 REGULAR SALARIES Information Systems Technician 2.00 2.00 ITOTAL 2.00 2.00 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT I CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Internet Access Verizon Internet $10,716 I Saphony (Web Updates) 9,900 Hermosawave (Web Hosting) 300 Hermosawave WIFI (Web Hosting) 300 I Contract Software Maintenance and Licenses: Eden - Financial System 24,158 Power -Park - Parking Citations 15,330 Hdl — Business Licences 3,800 ICLASS - Recreation Classes/Facilities Management 5,850 Prosum - Network Support 17,250 I Accela, Officelink and Workflow (Permits) 16,443 OSPlus - Phone Call Accounting System 2,023 MS Select Agreement 8,120 I Datavault - Offsite Tape Storage 2,575 Printer Maintenance 9,512 ESRI (GIS) 417 I Rocket Internet (WIFI) 8,400 Source Graphics (Scanner) 2,976 Source Graphics (Plotter) 700 ARC IMS (GIS) 2,000 I Adelphia (Airspace Monitoring) 1,642 AMN (XYMAPS-GIS) 3,000 Aether - Fire System Maintenance 1,429 I Business Computing - Animal Licenses 650 Quadrant - Cash Register 880 Autodesk (Computer Aided Design) 203 I Data Quick (Electronic Map Updates) 500 95 CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS (Continued) OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services — Private Eden Inforum/Gold Disaster Recovery Service (Continued) Needs Assessment and Inventory Study for Telephone System Replacement Symantec Edition 9.0 — Anti-spyware Upgrade Pager Service Total 5402 Equipment — Less Than $1,000 Color Laserjet Printer for General Appropriations Secretary Color Laserjet Printer for GIS and Planning Exhibits Total 4,443 5,000 1,833 80 $160,430 $800 800 $1,600 96 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 1206 Information Systems City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1206-4100 Personal Services 1206-4102 Regular Salaries 113,856 117,840 68,740 117,840 117,840 1206-4111 Accrual Cash In 4,627 6,151 1,020 6,151 6,683 1206-4180 Retirement 8,528 13,420 7,828 13,420 26,438 1206-4188 Employee Benefits 9,950 10,999 6,152 10,689 11,387 1206-4189 Medicare Benefits 1,686 1,709 1,012 1,724 1,809 Total Personal Services 138,647 150,119 84,752 149,824 164,157 1206-4200 Contract Services 1206-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 89,974 172,640 87,728 122,597 160,430 89,974 172,640 87,728 122,597 160,430 1206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1206-4304 Telephone 4,401 5,371 2,638 4,538 4,991 1206-4305 Office Oper Supplies 5,167 8,716 5,346 8,400 9,240 1206-4309 Maintenance Materials 6,013 8,382 0 5,000 5,500 1206-4315 Membership 0 300 0 300 300 1206-4317 Conference/Training 8,899 9,700 0 0 8,534 1206-4396 Insurance User Charges 4,535 4,834 2,821 4,834 5,320 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 29,015 37,303 10,805 23,072 33,885 1206-4900 Depreciation 1206-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 58,967 94,396 0 60,000 60,000 Total Depreciation 58,967 94,396 0 60,000 60,000 1206-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1206-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 3,288 62,756 0 0 6,400 1206-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 36 0 55,497 60,770 50,391 Total Equipment/Furniture 3,324 62,756 55,497 60,770 56,791 Total Information Systems 319,927 517,214 238,782 416,263 475,263 97 This page intentionally left blank 98 1 PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES 99 PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This account is designed to provide funds to cover unanticipated expenses or opportunities that arise during the fiscal year. In past years, this account has provided funds to assist in meeting the overall work plan of the City or a particular department OBJEC CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4322 Unclassified OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS EXPLANATION Funds for Unanticipated Expenses $753,688 100 001 General Fund 1214 Prospective Expenditures 1214-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1214-4322 Unclassified Total Materials/Supplies/Other City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 0 61,227 0 61,227 753,688 0 61,227 0 61,227 753,688 Total Prospective Expenditures 0 61,227 0 61,227 753,688 101 This page intentionally left blank 102 CITY PROSECUTOR CITY PROSECUTOR DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The City Prosecutor is the legal counsel for criminal matters and interacts with the Police Department regarding potential cases. The Code Enforcement Prosecutor is the legal counsel for criminal zoning violations and bootleg enforcement actions. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJEC CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private EXPLANATION Prosecutor Services Code Enforcement Prosecutor Dispute Resolution Services Total $122,000 15,000 8,000 $145,000 104 001 General Fund 1132 City Prosecutor 1132-4100 Personal Services 1132-4188 Employee Benefits Total Personal Services 1132-4200 Contract Services 1132-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 4,497 4,928 2,721 4,745 5,677 4,497 4,928 2,721 4,745 5,677 125,083 140,000 62,063 140,000 145,000 125,083 140,000 62,063 140,000 145,000 1132-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1132-4304 Telephone 134 125 129 220 220 1132-4305 Office Oper Supplies 189 200 70 200 200 1132-4315 Membership 250 150 125 125 125 1132-4317 Conference/Training 117 500 0 250 300 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 690 975 324 795 845 Total City Prosecutor 130,270 145,903 65,108 145,540 151,522 105 This page intentionally left blank 106 ti 0 am am a Oft ail me am O ale all lOp i gm ma am a or INS t I CITY TREASURER DEPARTMENT I SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET I DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: It is the responsibility of the Treasurer to receive and keep safely all money coming into the City (California Government Code 41001). It is the duty of the Treasurer to deposit those public funds in accordance with applicable laws, and to pay out money on warrants and demands made upon the City. The City Treasurer is required to submit a monthly report accounting for all receipts, disbursements, and cash balances of the City. POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER OBJEC AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED T CODES 04-05 05-06 4102 REGULAR SALARIES I Deputy City Treasurer 0.50 0.50 TOTAL 0.50 0.50 4112 PART-TIME/TEMPORARY City Treasurer 1.00 1.001 TOTAL 1.00 1.00 GRAND TOTAL 1.50 1.50 1 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJEC I CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Safekeeping Fees $3,500 Bank Service Charges 17,508111 Online Banking/Fraud Services 3,498 Office Machine Maintenance 26 Phone Maintenance 205 E Total $24,737 7 1 111 108 � 1 1 t 1 1 r r 001 General Fund 1141 City Treasurer City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1141-4100 Personal Services 1141-4102 Regular Salaries 22,898 24,132 14,077 24,132 24,132 1141-4111 Accrual Cash In (79) 176 0 176 191 1141-4112 Part Time/Temporary 15,906 16,464 9,279 15,906 15,912 1141-4180 Retirement 2,906 4,623 2,660 4,559 8,985 1141-4188 Employee Benefits 11,602 12,615 7,041 12,249 13,086 1141-4189 Medicare Benefits 563 589 339 582 584 Total Personal Services 53,796 58,599 33,396 57,604 62,890 1141-4200 Contract Services 1141-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 19,332 24,835 12,583 24,833 24,737 19,332 24,835 12,583 24,833 24,737 1141-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1141-4304 Telephone 697 821 248 538 538 1141-4305 Office Oper Supplies 2,335 2,098 1,184 2,098 2,098 1141-4315 Membership 120 120 0 120 120 1141-4317 Conference/Training 778 1,140 0 120 1,140 1141-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 8,595 7,851 4,578 7,851 9,007 1141-4396 Insurance User Charges 2,224 2,188 1,274 2,188 2,228 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 14,749 14,218 7,284 12,915 15,131 Total City Treasurer 87,877 97,652 53,263 95,352 102,758 109 1 1 1 1 1 1 This page intentionally left blank 110 AIN gi• Juni mum on OP SR ea woe MO NI sow awl ow mei COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING & SAFETY/CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The primary function of the Building & Safety Division is to enforce construction standards for the safeguarding of life, health, and property through field inspection and the checking of construction drawings for compliance with codes, zoning, use location, occupancy, materials and structural soundness. POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER OBJECT AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED CODES 04-05 05-06 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Community Development Director 0.50 0.50 Senior Building Inspector 1.00 1.00 Building Inspector 2.00 2.00 Code Enforcement Officer 0.50 0.50 Clerk Typist 1.00 1.00 TOTAL 5.00 5.00 4112 PART-TIME/TEMPORARY Clerk Assistant 0.50 0.50 Planning/Building Technician 0.50 0.50 TOTAL 1.00 1.00 GRAND TOTAL 6.00 6.00 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private EXPLANATION Plan Check $168,710 Plan Archive/Microfiche 2,500 Temporary Clerical ServiceNacations 1,168 Convert Building Index Cards to Laserfiche 1,100 Phone Maintenance 347 Total $173,825 112 001 General Fund 4201 Community Development/Building City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 4201-4100 Personal Services 4201-4102 Regular Salaries 256,296 325,492 165,078 277,148 329,065 4201-4111 Accrual Cash In 4,250 4,833 6,202 4,833 5,250 4201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 30,654 8,643 17,931 30,750 25,928 4201-4180 Retirement 19,342 36,828 19,420 30,746 76,980 4201-4188 Employee Benefits 33,862 35,596 20,106 34,958 36,943 4201-4189 Medicare Benefits 5,038 4,723 3,160 4,089 5,226 Total Personal Services 349,442 416,115 231,897 382,524 479,392 4201-4200 Contract Services 4201-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 251,389 177,578 29,341 177,578 173,825 251,389 177,578 29,341 177,578 173,825 4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4201-4304 Telephone 3,105 2,675 1,749 2,675 2,675 4201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 6,525 6,600 3,062 6,600 6,600 4201-4315 Membership 880 1,970 90 1,970 1,435 4201-4317 Conference/Training 1,580 3,500 1,125 3,500 4,000 4201-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 41,165 32,381 18,886 32,381 36,566 4201-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 13,121 19,530 11,389 19,530 22,593 4201-4396 Insurance User Charges 23,181 25,006 14,588 25,006 28,381 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 89,557 91,662 50,889 91,662 102,250 4201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 4201-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Furniture 0 450 0 450 0 0 450 0 450 0 Total Community Development/Building 690,388 685,805 312,127 652,214 755,467 113 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Planning Division is involved with six main areas of responsibilities which are the keys to forming the direction of the City; advance planning; current planning; zoning; research; environmental assessment; and administration including grant programs, e.g., transportation. The Division is also the primary administrative liaison to the Planning Commission. OBJECT CODES 4102 POSITION SUMMARY REGULAR SALARIES Community Development Director Senior Planner Planning Associate Planning Assistant Code Enforcement Officer Administrative Assistant CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 0.37 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.81 0.37' 1.002 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.893 TOTAL 4.51 4.76 4112 PART-TIME/TEMPORARY Planning Intern 0.50 0.50 Planning/Building Technician 0.50 0.504 TOTAL 1.00 1.00 GRAND TOTAL 5.51 5.76 ' Salaries not distributed to Community Development Block Grant Administration 2 Salaries not distributed to Community Development Block Grant Administration, Reduce Salary Distribution for Dial -A -Ride Administration 3 Reduce Salary Distribution for Dial -A -Ride Administration `Part-time Technician for Zone Check Plans OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private 300' Noticing, Public Hearings $29,750 Planning Commission Minutes Secretary 8,640 Temporary Clerical ServiceNacations 5,072 Plan Archive/Microfiche 2,000 Zoning/General Plan Map Updating 500 Phone Maintenance 215 Total $46,177 114 001 General Fund 4101 Community Development/Planning 4101-4100 4101-4102 4101-4111 4101-4112 4101-4180 4101-4188 4101-4189 Personal Services Regular Salaries Accrual Cash In Part Time/Temporary Retirement Employee Benefits Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 4101-4200 Contract Services 4101-4201 Contract Sery/Private Total Contract Services 4101-4300 4101-4304 4101-4305 4101-4315 4101-4317 Materials/Supplies/Other Telephone Office Oper Supplies Membership Conference/Training 4101-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 4101-4396 Insurance User Charges Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total Community Development/Planning City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2003-04 Expended 2004-05 Total Budget 2004-05 Expended YTD (Thru Jan) 2004-05 Year End Estimate 2005-06 Department Request 240,822 288,333 154,194 272,795 322,377 3,945 6,503 8,116 6,503 7,065 4,757 36,703 7,159 36,703 25,345 19,949 38,924 19,346 30,264 79,313 32,156 38,675 20,593 35,683 43,505 4,285 4,987 3,153 4,050 5,396 305,914 414,125 212,561 385,998 483,001 33,343 57,217 23,256 57,217 46,177 33,343 57,217 23,256 57,217 46,177 1,161 1,000 903 1,300 1,300 4,600 7,700 2,634 7,700 7,700 541 1,360 470 1,360 1,380 2,750 3,185 52 3,185 3,600 26,705 20,316 11,851 20,316 22,809 12,052 12,687 7,399 12,687 13,787 47,809 46,248 23,309 46,548 50,576 387,066 517,590 259,126 489,763 579,754 115 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SOURCE OF FUNDS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This department accounts for all costs associated with the general administration of the Community Development Block Grant Program. Costs include personnel costs for training, mileage and other non -project specific costs. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Contract Planner to Administer Program $10,700 116 City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 140 Community Development Block Grant Fund 4707 CDBG Program General Administration 4707-4200 Contract Services 4707-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 4707-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4707-4317 Training/Conference Total Materials/Supplies/Other 11,603 11,000 9,716 11,300 10,700 11,603 11,000 9,716 11,300 10,700 0 300 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 Total CDBG Program General Administration 11,603 11,300 9,716 11,300 10,700 117 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION — COMMUTER EXPRESS PARTICIPATION SOURCE OF FUNDS: PROPOSITION A FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This Commuter Express Program (Line 438) is currently operated by the City of Los Angeles encompassing four jurisdictions: City of Los Angeles, City of Hermosa Beach, City of Manhattan Beach, and Culver City, which offers freeway express service to downtown Los Angeles. Total ridership for 2003-04 was 13,312. OBJECT CODES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Administrative Assistant TOTAL POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4251 Contract Services, Government City of Los Angeles, Commuter Express (Freeway Express Service) $8,572 118 145 Proposition A Fund 3408 Commuter Express 3408-4100 Personal Services 3408-4102 Regular Salaries Total Personal Services 3408-4200 Contract Services 3408-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1,266 1,448 770 1,448 1,286 1,266 1,448 770 1,448 1,286 8,460 9,654 0 9,654 8,572 8,460 9,654 0 9,654 8,572 Total Commuter Express 9,726 11,102 770 11,102 9,858 119 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION — DIAL -A -RIDE SOURCE OF FUNDS: PROPOSITION A FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Dial -A -Ride program, a joint venture program between the cities of Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach, is a public curb -to -curb transit service available to residents of Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach and serving the areas of Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach and selected satellite points. Total ridership for 2003-04 was 66,149; Hermosa Beach ridership was 8,773. POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER OBJECT AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED CODES 04-05 05-06 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Community Development Director 0.09 0.09 Senior Planner 0.17 0.00' Administrative Assistant 0.17 0.09' TOTAL ' Reduce salary distribution for program administration 0.43 0.18 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4251 Contract Services, Government City's Share of the Cost in Conjunction with City of Redondo Beach Transit Service $233,448 120 145 Proposition A Fund 3401 Dial A Ride 3401-4100 Personal Services 3401-4102 Regular Salaries Total Personal Services 3401-4200 Contract Services 3401-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 3401-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3401-4305 Office Oper Supplies Total Materials/Supplies/Other City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 30,529 34,255 19,095 24,400 15,997 30,529 34,255 19,095 24,400 15,997 221,047 233,448 0 162,660 107,738 221,047 233,448 0 162,660 107,738 11 850 3 600 400 11 850 3 600 400 Total Dial A Ride 251,587 268,553 19,098 187,660 124,135 121 This page intentionally left blank 122 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 COMMUNITY RESOURCES/CABLE TV 123 This page intentionally left blank 124 I COMMUNITY RESOURCES/CABLE TV DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND �►' 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Community Resources Department plans and implements recreational, cultural and social service programs and special events in the City's parks, beaches and public facilities. The Department also manages the Community Center, Civic Theatre, Clark Building and other recreational facilities which provide rental and lease space for classes, meetings, social events and non-profit organizations. The Department serves as staff support for the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission. Cable TV is responsible for franchise administration, contract negotiations, filming City Council, Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Public Works Commission meetings, administering cable advisory board, servicing of citizen complaints, monitoring legislation and industry practices, standards and technology. POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER OBJECT AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED CODES 04-05 05-06 4102 REGULAR SALARIES I Community Resources Director 1.00 1.00 Recreation Supervisor 1.96 0.96 Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 I Clerk Typist 1.00 0.69 TOTAL 4.96 3.65 I 4112 PART-TIME/TEMPORARY Camera Operator 1.00 1.00 Theatre Technician 2.00 2.00 I Recreation Leader 7.00 7.00 Seasonal Recreation Leader 6.00 6.00 TOTAL 16.00 16.00 PGRAND TOTAL 20.96 19.65 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS IOBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION I 4201 Contract Services, Private Roller Hockey/Softball Officials $15,000 Veri-sign Secure Site License 299 MasterCardNisa Charges 5,000 Theatre Technicians 5,000 1 Excursions 15,000 Office Machine Maintenance 400 Scholarships 1,500 I Pager Service 450 Phone Maintenance 1,375 Sunset Concerts Series ($25,000 American I Express Donation, $14,000 Arrowhead/Corona Light Donations and $2,500 24 -Hour Fitness Donation) 50,000 Total $94,024 1 125 COMMUNITY RESOURCES/CABLE TV DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS (Continued) OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4221 Contract Recreation Classes EXPLANATION Recreational Class Instructors (Paid from Fees in Contract Recreation Class Revenue Account) $215,000 5402 Equipment — More Than $1,000 File Cabinets and Shelving for Front Office $7,000 Replacement Tables and Chairs for Community Center 3,000 Total $10,000 126 001 General Fund 4601 Community Resources City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 4601-4100 Personal Services 4601-4102 Regular Salaries 182,131 303,445 81,977 162,339 235,937 4601-4106 Regular Overtime 2,389 2,700 (515) 2,700 2,700 4601-4111 Accrual Cash In (1,255) 22,936 3,952 22,936 24,919 4601-4112 Part Time/Temporary 165,895 130,000 109,959 160,000 160,000 4601-4180 Retirement 13,765 36,809 11,050 18,292 59,775 4601-4188 Employee Benefits 16,172 40,630 9,273 22,513 36,691 4601-4189 Medicare Benefits 11,846 14,796 6,968 11,720 12,229 Total Personal Services 390,943 551,316 222,664 400,500 532,251 4601-4200 Contract Services 4601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 121,918 94,935 57,172 75,000 94,024 4601-4221 Contract Rec Classes/Programs 214,762 197,000 137,523 200,000 215,000 Total Contract Services 336,680 291,935 194,695 275,000 309,024 4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4601-4302 Advertising 26,877 28,500 11,428 28,500 30,000 4601-4304 Telephone 9,789 9,220 4,329 9,800 9,800 4601-4305 Office Oper Supplies 10,898 8,458 8,435 10,000 12,000 4601-4308 Program Materials 34,175 21,120 9,219 20,000 25,000 4601-4309 Maintenance Materials 618 1,000 123 0 0 4601-4315 Membership 971 1,100 735 1,100 1,100 4601-4317 Conference/Training 4,176 5,000 0 5,000 5,000 4601-4319 Special Events 3,877 0 0 0 0 4601-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 49,861 44,945 26,215 44,945 43,558 4601-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 12,222 15,925 9,289 15,925 18,782 4601-4396 Insurance User Charges 42,920 40,892 23,856 40,982 42,801 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 196,384 176,160 93,629 176,252 188,041 4601-5400 Equipment/Furniture 4601-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 8,440 9,542 7,063 9,542 0 4601-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 1,390 0 0 0 10,000 Total Equipment/Furniture 9,830 9,542 7,063 9,542 10,000 Total Community Resources 933,837 1,028,953 518,051 861,294 1,039,316 127 COMMUNITY RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECREATION TRANSPORTATION SOURCE OF FUNDS: PROP A FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides transportation for recreation activities. OBJECT CODES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Recreation Supervisor 0.04 0.04 POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 TOTAL 0.04 0.04 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private EXPLANATION Recreation Transportation for Excursions $20,000 128 145 Proposition A Fund 3409 Recreation Transportation 3409-4100 Personal Services 3409-4102 Regular Salaries Total Personal Services 3409-4200 Contract Services 3409-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1,648 3,124 1,244 3,124 3,124 1,648 3,124 1,244 3,124 3,124 14,459 21,400 11,073 20,000 20,000 14,459 21,400 11,073 20,000 20,000 Total Recreation Transportation 16,107 24,524 12,317 23,124 23,124 129 This page intentionally left blank 130 FINANCE M UN 1101 Mil ill 1110 11111111 MO MN ell NM MI IN MI IIIF IMO MO MS FINANCE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Finance Administration division of the Finance Department is responsible for the City's financial and accounting activities including financial reporting, payroll, and accounts payable/receivable. The Department assists the City Manager with the annual operating and capital improvement budgets and provides support services to the operating departments. POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER OBJECT AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED CODES 04-05 05-06 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Finance Director 0.85 0.85 Accounting Supervisor 1.00 1.00 Administrative Assistant 0.85 0.85 Senior Account Clerk 2.50 2.50 TOTAL 5.20 5.20 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Independent Audit Services $23,225 Property Tax Audit Services 5,000 State Controllers & Street Reports 4,300 Sales Tax Audit Services 4,000 Mandated Costs Claims Flat Fee 4,100 Phone Maintenance 475 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR ) Awards Application Fee 450 Budget Awards Application Fee 275 Overlapping Debt Statement (CAFR) 350 Office Machine Maintenance 100 Utility User Tax (UUT) Audit Legal Services 5,000 Utility User Tax (UUT) Audit Services 5,000 Budget Awards Application Fee (CSMFO) 25 Compliance Review and Audit of Transient Occupancy Taxes for 8 of 9 Hotels 8,000 Check Encoder Annual Maintenance 1,025 Express Mail Services 150 California Society of Municipal Finance Officers CAFR Awards Application Fee 35 Total $61,510 132 001 General Fund 1202 Finance Administration City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1202-4100 Personal Services 1202-4102 Regular Salaries 319,901 336,718 198,745 336,644 338,926 1202-4106 Regular Overtime 0 581 0 0 843 1202-4111 Accrual Cash In 18,292 22,145 17,242 22,145 24,060 1202-4180 Retirement 23,694 37,939 22,396 37,844 75,240 1202-4188 Employee Benefits 41,332 43,942 24,861 43,011 44,975 1202-4189 Medicare Benefits 2,344 2,407 1,446 2,455 2,800 Total Personal Services 405,563 443,732 264,690 442,099 486,844 1202-4200 Contract Services 1202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 70,861 90,606 36,799 89,627 61,510 1202-4251 Contract Service/Govt 2,987 0 0 0 0 Total Contract Services 73,848 90,606 36,799 89,627 61,510 1202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1202-4304 Telephone 1,928 2,200 991 1,876 2,200 1202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 9,875 9,913 5,957 9,958 10,067 1202-4315 Membership 335 350 315 340 350 1202-4317 Conference/Training 3,968 5,767 2,879 3,602 6,790 1202-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 48,219 37,031 21,602 37,031 41,792 1202-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 5,608 0 0 0 0 1202-4396 Insurance User Charges 16,538 16,671 9,723 16,671 17,377 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 86,471 71,932 41,467 69,478 78,576 Total Finance Administration 565,882 606,270 342,956 601,204 626,930 133 FINANCE DEPARTMENT CASHIER DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: PARKING FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This division of the Finance Department serves as the City's Cashier for incoming revenue. The division is responsible for the sale and record keeping for business licenses, animal licenses, various parking permits (preferential resident permits, daily permits, contractor's permits, temporary guest permits for the impacted beach area and driveway permits), bus passes and cash keys for use in the parking meters. Additionally, the division processes all parking citation payments and maintains the parking citation records. POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER OBJECT AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED CODES 04-05 05-06 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Finance Director 0.15 0.15 Administrative Assistant 0.15 0.15 Citation Records Administrator 1.00 1.00 Account Clerk 4.00 4.00 TOTAL 5.30 5.30 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private EXPLANATION MasterCardNisa Service Charges Office Machine Maintenance Fax Machine Maintenance Motor Vehicle Registration Retrieval Hardware, Software Training for Automatic Credit Card Processing through the Cast Register Local Government Sharing Program Phone Maintenance Total $14,890 90 211 3,662 2,645 500 240 $22,238 5401 Equipment — Less Than $1,000 Debit Card Processing Terminal $355 134 110 Parking Fund 1204 Finance Cashier City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1204-4100 Personal Services 1204-4102 Regular Salaries 255,655 273,397 156,577 273,397 273,902 1204-4106 Regular Overtime 0 500 0 250 500 1204-4111 Accrual Cash In 2,623 4,042 1,409 4,042 4,392 1204-4180 Retirement 19,102 31,062 17,790 31,062 61,312 1204-4188 Employee Benefits 39,613 44,826 24,909 44,826 46,195 1204-4189 Medicare Benefits 2,563 2,658 1,549 2,658 2,729 Total Personal Services 319,556 356,485 202,234 356,235 389,030 1204-4200 Contract Services 1204-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 55,150 26,763 15,105 26,104 22,238 55,150 26,763 15,105 26,104 22,238 1204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1204-4304 Telephone 2,039 1,944 1,199 2,263 2,249 1204-4305 Office Oper Supplies 19,928 25,605 17,759 26,353 26,902 1204-4315 Membership 150 175 50 150 150 1204-4317 Conference/Training 1,952 3,094 1,400 2,559 4,371 1204-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 67,879 54,430 31,752 54,430 61,277 1204-4396 Insurance User Charges 10,446 11,122 6,489 11,122 11,568 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 102,394 96,370 58,649 96,877 106,517 1204-4900 Depreciation 1204-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equip Total Depreciation 216 850 0 886 886 216 850 0 886 886 1204-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1204-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 0 0 0 0 355 Total Equipment/Furniture 0 0 0 0 355 Total Finance Cashier 477,316 480,468 275,988 480,102 519,026 135 FINANCE DEPARTMENT CASHIER DIVISION — BUS PASS SUBSIDY SOURCE OF FUNDS: PROPOSITION A FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Using Proposition A funds, the City subsidizes the sale of bus passes to Hermosa Beach residents. Passes are available to students, senior citizens, and disabled persons in the Cashier Division of the Finance Department. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4251 Contract Services, Government Bus Pass Subsidy $1,500 136 145 Proposition A Fund 3403 Bus Pass Subsidy 3403-4200 Contract Services 3403-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 744 1,000 876 1,500 1,500 744 1,000 876 1,500 1,500 Total Bus Pass Subsidy 744 1,000 876 1,500 1,500 137 FINANCE DEPARTMENT BAYVIEW DRIVE ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE LOWER PIER AVENUE ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE MYRTLE AVENUE ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE LOMA DRIVE ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE & BEACH DRIVE ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE SOURCE OF FUNDS: BAYVIEW DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND LOWER PIER AVENUE REDEMPTION FUND MYRTLE AVENUE ASSESSMENT FUND LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND & BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The fiscal agent agreements, in connection with the Lower Pier Avenue Improvement District, Myrtle Avenue Utility Undergrounding District (97-1) and the Loma Drive Utility Undergrounding District (97-2), require that the City establish these accounts for the payment of all on-going fees and charges that arise in connection with the administration of the assessments. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION Bayview Drive District Administrative Charge 4201 Contract Services, Private Assessment Administration Fees $1,582 Lower Pier Avenue Administrative Charge 4201 Contract Services, Private Assessment Administration Fees $1,900 Myrtle Avenue Administrative Charge 4201 Contract Services, Private Assessment Administration Fees $5,850 Loma Drive Administrative Charge 4201 Contract Services, Private Assessment Administration Fees $6,300 Beach Drive District Administrative Charge 4201 Contract Services, Private Assessment Administration Fees $1,550 138 City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 135 Bayview Drive District Administrative Expense Fund 1219 Administrative Charges 1219-4200 Contract Services 1219-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Administrative Charges 136 Lower Pier Administrative Expense Fund 1219 Administrative Charges 1219-4200 Contract Services 1219-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Administrative Charges 137 Myrtle District Administrative Expense Fund 1219 Administrative Charges 1219-4200 Contract Services 1219-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Administrative Charges 138 Loma District Administrative Expense Fund 1219 Administrative Charges 1219-4200 Contract Services 1219-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Administrative Charges 0 0 0 0 1,582 0 0 0 0 1,582 0 0 0 0 1,582 1,762 1,851 741 1,851 1,900 1,762 1,851 741 1,851 1,900 1,762 1,851 741 1,851 1,900 4,099 5,900 4,618 5,600 5,850 4,099 5,900 4,618 5,600 5,850 4,099 5,900 4,618 5,600 5,850 4,458 6,355 4,724 5,900 6,300 4,458 6,355 4,724 5,900 6,300 4,458 6,355 4,724 5,900 6,300 139 Beach Drive Assessment District Administrative Expense Fund 1219 Administrative Charges 1219-4200 Contract Services 1219-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services Total Administrative Charges 0 1,357 1,057 1,477 1,550 0 1,357 1,057 1,477 1,550 0 1,357 1,057 1,477 1,550 139 This page intentionally left blank 140 OM 111111 WO r - IMO - UN NI- OM- SO e- ;S IN r gm FIRE DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The function of the Fire Department is to protect life and property within the City from fires, explosions and natural disasters. The Fire Department conducts fire and life -safety inspections; enforces codes and ordinances; apprehends and assists in the prosecution of arson; investigates, gathers and preserves evidence; and provides public education. The Fire Department provides basic to advanced life support and transport of emergency medical incidents ranging from first aid to life-threatening or traumatic injuries. The Fire Department also administers the City's Hazardous Material Pian and Emergency Preparedness Program. OBJECT CODES 4102 NON -SWORN POSITIONS Administrative Assistant TOTAL POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 SWORN POSITIONS Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 Assistant Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 Fire Captain 3.00 3.00 Fire Engineer 6.00 6.00 Firefighter/Paramedic 9.00 9.00 TOTAL 4112 PART-TIME/TEMPORARY Reserve Firefighter TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 20.00 20.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 47.00 47.00 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private EXPLANATION Nurse Educator Uninterrupted Power Source Systems Maintenance Annual Fit Test (Respiratory Protection Program) Fire Information Support Services Office Machine Maintenance 142 $21,879 1,124 1,800 6,900 260 FIRE DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS (Continued) OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Annual Ladder Testing Phone Maintenance Total 2,000 1,529 $35,492 4251 Contract Services, Government South Bay Regional Communications Dispatching $53,019 Area G Disaster Preparedness 2,676 Air Filling Station Fee/Breathing Apparatus 300 4350 Safety Gear Total $55,995 Firefighter Safety Turnouts (6) $6,500 Repairs/Modifications to Turnout Safety Equipment 1,500 Replacement Firefighter Safety Turnout Boots (6) 1,236 Firefighter Safety Helmets (7) 1,400 Replacement of Firefighter Brush/Strike Team Gear (3) 1,680 Replacement of Worn 2 -Piece Foul Weather Safety Gear Sets (8) 1,800 Firefighter "Hot Shields" Filters (Required Annually) (12) 936 Firefighter Wildland Gloves (8) 120 Web Gear Accessories for Strike Team 200 Self-contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) Face Masks (4) 200 Total $15,572 5401 Equipment — Less Than $1,000 Replacement Vacuum Cleaners (2) $900 Firefighter Utility Gloves (25) 300 Replacement of Worn Hydrant Wrenches (2) 130 Replacement of Worn Nozzle Fittings (8) 275 Replacement of Worn Chains for Saws (4) 640 Auto Extrication and Forcible Entry Tool 75 Life Safety Rope 200 Absorbent for Traffic Accident Spills 500 Scene Safety Reflective Tape (12 Rolls) 300 Replacement Battery for Reciprocating Saw 125 Batteries for Thermal Imager (2) 220 Replacement Batteries for Power Tools 60 Replacement of Worn Hand Tools (Station and E13) 900 143 FIRE DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS (Continued) OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 5401 Equipment — Less Than $1,000 Dura Crib Chock Blocks/Stabilizer Blocks 110 Leader Hose Lines for Pre -connect Hose on Engines 160 Strike Team/Brushfire Gear Bags (4) 850 Hydraulic Fluid for Jaws of Life Tool 100 Embroidery for Strike Team Bags 150 Hose and Ladder Straps (6) 150 Replacement of Handy Talkie Radio Batteries 300 Triage Tarps (3) 400 Required Strike Team Equipment (Glow Sticks, Mirrors, Headlamps, Whistles, Weather Kit) 800 Parts and Repairs for Self-contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) 950 Communication Equipment for Radios (Antennas, Engraving, Batteries) 950 Protective Cylinder Sleeves for Self-contained Breathing Apparatus (14) 420 Arson Evidence Supplies (Evidence Containers, Camera Film, Recording Tapes) 950 Nickel Metal Hydride Batteries AA 75 Dormitory Emergency Alert Speakers and Installation (4) 600 Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Disaster Prep Mobile Display 500 Airpots for Emergency Operations Center (2) 120 Microwave for Emergency Operations Center 200 Lecturn for Emergency Operations Center 350 Paper Shredder for Emergency Operations Center 100 Universal Power Supply/Uninterrupted for Emergency Operations Center 500 Televisions for Emergency Operations Center (2) 900 Conventional Radio System for Emergency Operations Center 500 Phones for Emergency Operations Center 500 Desk Chairs for Emergency Operations Center 750 Task/Desk Lighting for Emergency Operations Center 350 Coffee Center for Emergency Operations Center 250 Laser Pointers for Emergency Operations Center 100 Drop Down Projector Screen for Emergency Operations Center 600 144 FIRE DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS (Continued) OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 5401 Equipment— Less Than $1,000 Replacement of Worn/Damaged Flashlights 200 Replacement of 20 Year Old Suction Unit (Medical) 600 Pulse Oximeter Essential for Primary Patient Assessment 600 Cell Phones for Captains and Premium Pay Positions 300 Total $19,010 5402 Equipment — More Than $1,000 Desks and Workspaces for Emergency Operations Center $4,000 Cubicle Walls for Emergency Operations Center 3,500 Computers for Emergency Operations Center 3,500 Emergency Radios for Emergency Operations Center 5,000 Tables for Emergency Operations Center (10) 3,000 Chairs for Emergency Operations Center (30) 1,500 Air Conditioning Units for Emergency Operations Center 2,400 File Cabinets/Storage for Emergency Operations Center 2,200 Mobile Radios for E12 and R11 (2) 2,000 Replace Worn Kitchen Refrigerators (2) 2,800 Picture Frames for Historic Fire Department Photos (12) 1,500 Replacement of Firefighter Air Paks (2) 7,200 Firefighter Down Alert Devices (2) 1,240 Radio Interface Device to Allow Use of Radio While Wearing Self-contained Breathing Apparatus Mask (6) 7,380 Replacement of Carbon Air Pak Bottles (4) 2,800 Replacement of Prossor Pump per Area "G" Wildland Equipment Protocol 1,141 Voice Amplification Devices for Use with Self-contained Breathing Apparatus (6) 1,000 Replacement of Worn/Damaged Drug Boxes and Trauma Bags (8) 1,200 Total $53,361 5405 Equipment — More Than $5,000 Monitor Defibrilator for E12 $10,000 145 001 General Fund 2201 Fire 2201-4100 Personal Services 2201-4102 Regular Salaries 2201-4106 Regular Overtime 2201-4108 FLSA Overtime 2201-4111 Accrual Cash In 2201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 2201-4119 Fitness Incentive 2201-4180 Retirement 2201-4187 Uniform Allowance 2201-4188 Employee Benefits 2201-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 2201-4200 Contract Services 2201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2201-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1,604,623 1,739,619 976,036 1,666,250 289,190 309,012 181,818 309,012 162,867 183,846 98,507 162,375 169,046 261,479 192,168 261,479 44,800 41,000 20,850 41,000 8,750 8,400 3,800 3,800 527,269 763,166 447,813 763,166 12,616 12,000 6,793 12,000 199,159 222,671 123,253 222,671 23,272 27,998 15,339 27,998 3,041,592 3,569,191 2,066,377 3,469,751 29,735 62,270 17,646 62,270 3,250 41,776 32,157 41,776 32,985 104,046 49,803 104,046 1,753,852 322,661 191,966 161,164 41,000 5,400 903,561 12,000 234,054 28,772 3,654,430 35,492 55,995 91,487 2201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2201-4304 Telephone 13,496 11,550 7,753 13,367 13,367 2201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 8,474 11,066 4,838 11,066 11,066 2201-4309 Maintenance Materials 18,858 21,000 10,403 21,000 21,000 2201-4314 Uniforms 5,723 5,600 2,135 5,600 10,400 2201-4315 Membership 3,464 3,370 3,463 3,463 3,610 2201-4317 Conference/Training 28,377 27,275 6,451 27,275 27,696 2201-4350 Safety Gear 0 0 0 0 15,572 2201-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 36,007 33,451 19,516 33,451 30,768 2201-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 125,952 143,246 83,559 143,246 187,042 2201-4396 Insurance User Charges 230,326 239,308 139,594 239,308 324,790 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 470,677 495,866 277,712 497,776 645,311 146 001 General Fund 2201 Fire City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 2201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2201-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 2,359 11,570 3,875 11,570 19,010 2201-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 10,492 28,172 11,462 28,172 53,361 2201-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0 0 0 0 10,000 Total Equipment/Furniture 12,851 39,742 15,337 39,742 82,371 Total Fire 3,558,105 4,208,845 2,409,229 4,111,315 4,473,599 147 This page intentionally left blank 148 PERSONNEL rn ■r - M- NM MB I I M MI MI N r- MO MN r- MN PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Personnel Department is responsible for recruitment, testing, training, labor relations (contract negotiations), and employee benefits. This department serves as staff liaison for the Civil Service Board. The Personnel Director also serves as the City's Risk Manager. POSITION SUMMARY OBJECT AUTHORIZED CODES 04-05 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Personnel and Risk Management Director 0.50 Personnel Assistant 0.50 TOTAL CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED 05-06 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Legal Services $30,000 Recruitment: Advertising 3,500 Oral Boards 500 Written Exams 4,000 Background Checks 5,000 Recruitment Flyers 1,000 Employee Service Pins 1,300 Phone Maintenance 320 Office Machine Maintenance 55 Total $45,675 4251 Contract Services, Government Employee Appeals Applicant Fingerprinting South Bay Cities' Council Of Governments Salary Survey Update Total $5,000 4,000 1,000 $10,000 150 001 General Fund 1203 Personnel City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1203-4100 Personal Services 1203-4102 Regular Salaries 80,703 83,460 50,636 83,460 83,460 1203-4111 Accrual Cash In 1,208 2,285 0 2,285 2,482 1203-4180 Retirement 5,887 9,265 5,627 9,265 18,254 1203-4188 Employee Benefits 38,404 39,629 30,447 39,629 42,192 1203-4189 Medicare Benefits 1,222 1,212 749 1,212 1,247 Total Personal Services 127,424 135,851 87,459 135,851 147,635 1203-4200 Contract Services 1203-4201 Contract Serv/Private 52,177 45,675 26,538 45,675 45,675 1203-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0 7,000 0 3,500 10,000 Total Contract Services 52,177 52,675 26,538 49,175 55,675 1203-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1203-4304 Telephone 1,664 1,885 1,067 1,885 1,885 1203-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1,790 4,000 2,612 3,500 4,000 1203-4315 Membership 609 820 594 820 820 1203-4317 Conference/Training 10,400 12,800 4,482 8,500 20,300 1203-4320 Medical Exams 7,907 14,100 3,921 8,000 12,600 1203-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 21,435 20,134 11,746 20,134 22,789 1203-4396 Insurance User Charges 4,513 4,597 2,681 4,597 5,253 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 48,318 58,336 27,103 47,436 67,647 1203-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 1203-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 Total Equipment/Furniture 178 0 0 0 0 178 0 0 0 0 Total Personnel 228,097 246,862 141,100 232,462 270,957 151 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS SOURCE OF FUNDS: INSURANCE FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This account reflects premium charges for the purchase of the City's insurance coverage for (1) all high-value vehicles, (2) property, and (3) required public officials bonds as specified in the Municipal Code. There are no salaries charged to this account. The City's Risk Manager is responsible for purchase of the required coverage. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private 4324 Claims/Settlements EXPLANATION Property Insurance Premium Auto Physical Damage (Includes Comprehensive and Collision Coverage for All High Value Vehicles) Bond Premiums City Treasurer (Annual) Finance Director (Annual) Blanket Public Employee Bond (Year 2 of 3) City Clerk (Year 3 of 4) City Manager (Year 1 of 3) Notary Bonds (4, Staggered 4 Year Terms) Oil and Gas Well (Year 1 of 3) Total $25,000 10,500 400 400 428 136 347 38 125 $37,374 Claims and Settlement Expenses $10,000 152 705 Insurance Fund 1210 Auto/Property/Bonds 1210-4200 Contract Services 1210-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 1210-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1210-4324 Claims/Settlements Total Materials/Supplies/Other City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 40,137 42,874 38,131 40,000 37,374 40,137 42,874 38,131 40,000 37,374 0 10,000 0 0 10,000 0 10,000 0 0 10,000 Total Auto/Property/Bonds 40,137 52,874 38,131 40,000 47,374 153 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD) SOURCE OF FUNDS: AB 2766 AIR QUALITY DEVELOPMENT FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Funds received from AB 2766/AQMD Emission Control Bill are deposited in the Air Quality Development Fund since they require separate accounting. Programs that reduce mobile source emissions are eligible for funding from these monies. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4327 AQMD Incentives Employee Incentives for Participation in Program (Ride -share, Walking, Bicycling) $1,000 154 152 Air Quality Management District Fund 3701 Emission Control 3701-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3701-4327 AQMD Incentives Total Materials/Supplies/Other City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 730 1,000 360 750 1,000 730 1,000 360 750 1,000 Total Emission Control 730 1,000 360 750 1,000 155 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: General Appropriations provides secretarial support services for all City departments. Purchases of central stores office supplies are mode from this account; charges are then made to individual departments as use occurs. POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER OBJECT AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED CODES 04-05 05-06 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Secretary 1.00 1.00 TOTAL 1.00 1.00 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Phone Maintenance $25 Office Machine Maintenance 15 Total $40 156 001 General Fund 1208 General Appropriations City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1208-4100 Personal Services 1208-4102 Regular Salaries 42,143 45,870 26,629 45,870 48,072 1208-4111 Accrual Cash In (215) 3,515 0 3,515 2,819 1208-4180 Retirement 3,157 5,224 3,032 5,224 10,786 1208-4188 Employee Benefits 9,600 10,496 5,822 9,266 10,841 1208-4189 Medicare Benefits 611 665 386 665 738 Total Personal Services 55,296 65,770 35,869 64,540 73,256 1208-4200 Contract Services 1208-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 8,807 36 36 36 40 8,807 36 36 36 40 1208-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1208-4304 Telephone 110 150 67 150 150 1208-4305 Office Oper Supplies (18,433) (20,000) (11,894) (20,000) (20,000) 1208-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 14,014 20,630 12,033 20,630 23,320 1208-4396 Insurance User Charges 2,246 2,351 1,372 2,351 2,432 Total Materials/Supplies/Other (2,063) 3,131 1,578 3,131 5,902 Total General Appropriations 62,040 68,937 37,483 67,707 79,198 157 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE SOURCE OF FUNDS: INSURANCE FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Liability Insurance account reflects charges for the purchase and maintenance of the City's liability insurance. Processing of claims filed against the City, administration of the City's contract with the liability claims administrator, litigation management, and safety programming is the responsibility of the Risk Manager. POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER OBJECT AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED CODES 04-05 05-06 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Personnel and Risk Management Director 0.25 0.25 Personnel Assistant 0.25 0.25 TOTAL 0.50 0.50 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Claims Administration Contract $15,000 Independent Cities Risk Management Authority Liability Insurance Premium 231,000 Total $246,000 4324 Claims/Settlements Claims and Settlement Expenses $350,000 The City carries excess liability insurance and maintains a self-insured retention (S.I.R.) level of $250,000. 158 705 Insurance Fund 1209 Liability Insurance City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1209-4100 Personal Services 1209-4102 Regular Salaries 40,351 41,730 25,318 41,730 41,730 1209-4111 Accrual Cash In 815 1,933 0 1,933 2,100 1209-4180 Retirement 2,944 4,633 2,814 4,633 9,127 1209-4188 Employee Benefits 5,634 5,837 3,727 6,047 7,118 1209-4189 Medicare Benefits 611 606 375 606 636 Total Personal Services 50,355 54,739 32,234 54,949 60,711 1209-4200 Contract Services 1209-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 293,742 325,000 306,199 325,000 246,000 293,742 325,000 306,199 325,000 246,000 1209-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1209-4305 Office Oper Supplies 135 500 25 150 250 1209-4315 Membership 155 350 100 350 350 1209-4317 Conference/Training 0 1,200 1,000 1,200 4,200 1209-4324 Claims/Settlements 92,781 350,000 175,556 325,000 350,000 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 93,071 352,050 176,681 326,700 354,800 Total Liability Insurance 437,168 731,789 515,114 706,649 661,511 159 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE SOURCE OF FUNDS: INSURANCE FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Unemployment Insurance account funds unemployment insurance benefits paid to eligible claimants. The Risk Manager is responsible for claims review and appeals of claims. The City is charged for the actual amount of unemployment insurance benefits paid to eligible ex-employees. (Individual Reimbursement Account Method) OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4186 Unemployment Benefits Unemployment Insurance Benefits Paid to Eligible Claimants $10,000 160 705 Insurance Fund 1215 Unemployment 1215-4100 Personal Services 1215-4186 Unemployment Claims Total Personal Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 754 10,000 0 1,000 10,000 754 10,000 0 1,000 10,000 Total Unemployment 754 10,000 0 1,000 10,000 161 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT WORKERS' COMPENSATION SOURCE OF FUNDS: INSURANCE FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Costs associated with industrial injuries and the purchase of excess workers' compensation insurance are charged to this account. The Risk Manager is responsible for administering the contract for third party claims administration and coordination of medical management and legal defense. POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER OBJECT AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED CODES 04-05 05-06 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Personnel and Risk Management Director 0.25 0.25 Personnel Assistant 0.25 0.25 TOTAL 0.50 0.50 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Claims Administration $42,000 Excess Premiums 157,000 Best Practices Consultation 20,000 Total $219,000 4324 Claims/Settlements Claims and Settlement Expenses $600,000 The City carries Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance above a Self -Insured Retention (S.I.R.) level of $500,000. 162 705 Insurance Fund 1217 Workers' Compensation City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 1217-4100 Personal Services 1217-4102 Regular Salaries 40,352 41,730 25,318 41,730 41,730 1217-4111 Accrual Cash In 815 1,933 0 1,933 2,100 1217-4180 Retirement 2,944 4,633 2,814 4,633 9,127 1217-4188 Employee Benefits 5,634 5,837 3,727 6,047 7,119 1217-4189 Medicare Benefits 611 606 375 606 636 Total Personal Services 50,356 54,739 32,234 54,949 60,712 1217-4200 Contract Services 1217-4201 Contract Serv/Private 79,084 90,250 173,181 181,000 219,000 1217-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0 5,500 0 0 0 Total Contract Services 79,084 95,750 173,181 181,000 219,000 1217-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1217-4305 Office Oper Supplies 37 500 21 100 500 1217-4317 Training/Conference 932 2,500 0 0 2,500 1217-4324 Claims/Settlements 1,543,083 500,000 419,902 550,000 600,000 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1,544,052 503,000 419,923 550,100 603,000 Total Workers' Compensation 1,673,492 653,489 625,338 786,049 882,712 163 This page intentionally left blank 164 W 0 LO. CD E i111101 M 111111 M M NM 1111 - NM MO NM 4E1 111111 I MN r M POLICE DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Police Department is responsible for preserving the peace, preventing crime and disorder by protecting life and property and the personal safety within the community through the enforcement of state laws and city ordinances, education and community services, all of which are accomplished by giving due consideration to efficient, economical, and timely operations. OBJECT CODES 4102 POSITION SUMMARY NON -SWORN POSITIONS Secretary to Department Director Police Service Officer Supervisor Police Service Officer Court Liaison Officer Crime Scene Investigator TOTAL SWORN POSITIONS Police Chief Police Captain Police Lieutenant Police Sergeant Police Officer TOTAL GRAND TOTAL ' Eliminate Position, replace with additional Police Service Officer 2 Officer no longer funded by Asset Forfeiture Funds AUTHORIZED 04-05 1.00 2.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED 05-06 1.00 2.00 8.00' 1.00 0.00' 12.00 12.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 26.00 36.00 48.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 27.002 37.00 49.00 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private EXPLANATION Uninterrupted Power Source Systems Maintenance Office Machine Maintenance Medical Services -Sexual Assault Response Team (SART) Statewide Prisoner Transportation Range Training and Equipment Medical Waste Disposal Background Investigations and Polygraph AudioNideo Tape Duplication 166 $2,248 810 11,000 2,000 15,000 650 2,500 1,500 POLICE DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS (Continued) OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Accurint Services (Information for Detectives) 350 Document Shredding Services 2,700 Phone Maintenance 3,608 Tiburon Records Management System, Annual Maintenance 17,800 South Bay Youth Project 3,000 Employee I.D. Cards 360 Total $63,526 4251 Contract Services, Government Fingerprint/Motor Vehicle/Booking Fees $4,000 South Bay Regional Communications Center, Police Dispatch Services 424,147 Total $428,147 4350 Safety Gear Ballistic Vests for Uniformed Officers (20) $17,000 167 001 General Fund 2101 Police 2101-4100 Personal Services 2101-4102 Regular Salaries 2101-4105 Special Duty Pay 2101-4106 Regular Overtime 2101-4111 Accrual Cash In 2101-4117 Shift Differential 2101-4118 Training Officer 2101-4180 Retirement 2101-4187 Uniform Allowance 2101-4188 Employee Benefits 2101-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 2101-4200 Contract Services 2101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2101-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 2,938,009 3,204,234 1,767,056 3,029,412 3,276,085 58,906 54,704 35,608 61,042 74,472 192,842 210,000 126,071 210,000 210,000 582,796 548,354 453,964 548,354 649,697 4,872 6,157 2,919 5,100 6,157 4,826 5,872 209 3,000 4,400 1,077,372 1,408,803 783,553 1,343,310 1,887,997 27,561 29,700 16,230 28,000 31,100 438,039 529,582 195,654 494,836 534,415 39,982 34,555 25,146 42,025 44,561 5,365,205 6,031,961 3,406,410 5,765,079 6,718,884 243,859 73,446 37,638 67,000 63,526 29,465 314,400 233,114 314,400 428,147 273,324 387,846 270,752 381,400 491,673 2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2101-4304 Telephone 63,363 60,000 32,678 57,000 57,000 2101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 19,453 18,294 10,500 18,294 18,294 2101-4306 Prisoner Maintenance 7,560 7,500 5,210 7,500 7,500 2101-4307 Radio Maintenance 2,097 3,500 527 3,500 3,500 2101-4309 Maintenance Materials 3,736 4,398 1,246 4,398 4,398 2101-4312 Travel Expense , POST 6,283 10,000 7,007 10,000 10,000 2101-4313 Travel Expense, STC 2,370 2,600 0 0 2,000 2101-4314 Uniforms 9,172 13,000 4,568 10,000 12,000 2101-4315 Membership 1,062 1,750 876 1,750 1,750 2101-4317 Conference/Training 10,613 14,800 2,667 11,000 15,200 2101-4350 Safety Gear 0 0 0 0 17,000 2101-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 31,263 37,086 21,637 37,086 37,420 2101-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 297,550 231,211 134,876 231,211 265,182 2101-4396 Insurance User Charges 631,543 635,134 370,496 635,134 728,219 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1,086,065 1,039,273 592,288 1,026,873 1,179,463 168 001 General Fund 2101 Police City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 2101-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 2101-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 1,677 5,444 1,117 5,444 0 2101-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 9,074 0 0 0 0 Total Equipment/Fumiture 10,751 5,444 1,117 5,444 0 2101-5600 Buildings/Improvements 2101-5601 Buildings Total Buildings/Improvements 0 17,996 0 17,996 0 0 17,996 0 17,996 0 Total Police 6,735,345 7,482,520 4,270,567 7,196,792 8,390,020 169 POLICE DEPARTMENT C.O.P.S. PROGRAM SOURCE OF FUNDS: SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) program, established by the state legislature in fiscal year 1996-97, provides funding for local agencies for the purpose of ensuring public safety. Funds must be used for front line municipal police services and must supplement and not supplant existing funding. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private 4251 Contract Services, Government 5401 Equipment — Less Than $1,000 5402 Equipment — More Than $1,000 EXPLANATION Space Needs Study $20,000 Special Event Security $10,000 Television, DVD Player, VHS Tape Player for Detective Bureau $1,500 Furniture for Police Station, Records and Jail Area $20,000 Body Wire for Detectives 10,000 Body Armor and Equipment for South Bay Platoon 4,000 Tazer Program (Purchase 6-8 Tazers and Training 4,500 Total $38,500 170 City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 153 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) 2106 C.O.P.S. Program 2106-4200 Contract Services 2106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2106-4251 Contract Services/Govt Total Contract Services 3,115 0 0 0 20,000 5,644 10,000 9,200 10,000 10,000 8,759 10,000 9,200 10,000 30,000 2106-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2106-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 2,774 5,000 4,385 5,000 1,500 2106-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 72,795 93,875 6,146 93,875 38,500 2106-5403 Vehicles 8,353 11,644 1,644 11,644 0 Total Equipment/Furniture 83,922 110,519 12,175 110,519 40,000 2106-5600 Buildings/Improvements 2106-5601 Buildings 2,020 53,628 0 53,628 0 2106-5602 Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs 980 0 0 0 0 Total Buildings/Improvements 3,000 53,628 0 53,628 0 Total C.O.P.S. Program 95,681 174,147 21,375 174,147 70,000 171 POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: PARKING FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Community Services Division is responsible for the enforcement of Municipal and California Vehicle Codes, servicing parking complaints, assisting in directing traffic, maintaining and operating parking meters. The Community Services Department is also responsible for servicing animal problems throughout the City, responding to complaints, caring for injured animals, patrolling for potential problems (i.e. prevent animal nuisance), and enforcement of Municipal and State laws. OBJECT CODES 4102 POSITION SUMMARY NON SWORN POSITIONS Community Services Field Supervisor Parking Meter Specialist Community Services Officer Parking Meter Maintenance Technician Administrative Review Investigator TOTAL SWORN POSITIONS Police Lieutenant TOTAL 4112 PART-TIME/TEMPORARY Hearing Officer TOTAL GRAND TOTAL CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 2.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 12.00 12.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 14.00 14.00 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Animal Disposal $3,540 Emergency Veterinary Service, After Hours 400 Vector Control - Bee Removal 2,550 Animal Hospital Emergency Veterinary Service 1,000 Phone Maintenance 646 Office Machine Maintenance 250 Refunds of Towing Expenses 1,600 Total $9,986 4251 Contract Services, Government Los Angeles County Animal Shelter Costs $1,800 South Bay Regional Communications Center, Dispatch Services $53,019 Total $54,819 172 I POLICE DEPARTMENT •e x'.• COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION _ r _ SOURCE OF FUNDS: PARKING FUND ►'"'� 2005-2006 BUDGET I OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS (Continued) OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 5401 Equipment — Less Than $1,000 Animal Cages and Traps $200 5402 Equipment — More Than $1,000 Office Furniture for Base 3 $10,000 9001 Parking Meters — Infrastructure Refurbished Parking Meter Heads (50) $5,400 111 I I 1 1 I 1 173 110 Parking Fund 3302 Community Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 3302-4100 Personal Services 3302-4102 Regular Salaries 635,657 675,668 375,722 655,941 682,132 3302-4106 Regular Overtime 4,927 4,000 3,600 5,500 5,000 3302-4111 Accrual Cash In 32,539 41,214 16,649 41,214 44,778 3302-4112 Part Time/Temporary 4,464 6,912 1,795 3,200 4,610 3302-4117 Shift Differential 4,957 5,325 2,647 4,600 5,325 3302-4118 Field Training Officer 0 500 152 300 500 3302-4180 Retirement 78,814 122,205 64,776 112,780 195,510 3302-4187 Uniform Allowance 5,780 5,880 3,067 5,880 5,880 3302-4188 Employee Benefits 85,364 96,017 52,511 91,777 98,811 3302-4189 Medicare Benefits 5,722 5,918 3,700 6,211 6,880 Total Personal Services 858,224 963,639 524,619 927,403 1,049,426 3302-4200 Contract Services 3302-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3302-4251 Contract Services/Govt Total Contract Services 10,853 2,299 9,835 4,088 40,600 30,911 9,835 40,600 9,986 54,819 13,152 50,435 34,999 50,435 64,805 3302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3302-4304 Telephone 3,107 3,000 1,415 3,000 3,000 3302-4305 Office Oper Supplies 5,375 5,000 4,432 5,000 5,000 3302-4307 Radio Maintenance 425 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 3302-4309 Maintenance Materials 16,686 9,553 5,388 9,553 13,000 3302-4314 Uniforms 761 2,000 0 1,000 2,000 3302-4315 Membership 100 375 0 150 200 3302-4317 Conference/Training 1,937 3,550 837 2,000 4,100 3302-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 56,641 58,801 34,300 58,801 83,262 3302-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 83,339 66,688 38,899 66,688 75,103 3302-4396 Insurance User Charges 102,065 111,167 64,848 111,167 120,001 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 270,436 261,134 150,119 258,359 306,666 3302-4900 Depreciation 3302-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equip 735 2,795 0 735 735 3302-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs 1,600 1,600 0 1,600 1,600 3302-4905 Infrastructure Depreciation 10,468 0 0 10,690 10,690 Total Depreciation 12,803 4,395 0 13,025 13,025 174 t 1, 1 1 110 Parking Fund 3302 Community Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 3302-5400 Equipment/Furniture 3302-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 161 200 0 200 200 3302-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 0 0 0 0 10,000 Total Equipment/Furniture 161 200 0 200 10,200 3302-9000 Infrastructure 3302-9001 Parking Meters - Infrastructure Total Infrastructure 0 4,447 0 4,447 5,400 0 4,447 0 4,447 5,400 Total Community Services 1,154,776 1,284,250 709,737 1,253,869 1,449,522 175 POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION — CROSSING GUARD PROGRAM SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Crossing Guard Program, administered by the Community Services Division, is responsible for the administration of the contract that provides crossing guard services to the children of Hermosa Beach. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private EXPLANATION Crossing Guard Service Contract $63,760 176 001 General Fund 2102 Crossing Guard 2102-4200 Contract Services 2102-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 60,842 62,210 22,306 62,210 63,760 60,842 62,210 22,306 62,210 63,760 Total Crossing Guard 60,842 62,210 22,306 62,210 63,760 177 POLICE DEPARTMENT DIAL -A -TAXI PROGRAM SOURCE OF FUNDS: PROPOSITION A FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Dial -a -Taxi Program provides service to seniors and disabled residents of Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach. Eligible residents purchase taxi vouchers that are good for one-way trips to selected satellite points. (The Dial -a -Taxi Program was implemented in March 2002) OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private EXPLANATION Cost of Taxi Vouchers $41,000 178 145 Proposition A Fund 3404 Dial -A -Taxi Program 3404-4200 Contract Services 3404-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 31,952 25,000 13,487 41,000 41,000 31,952 25,000 13,487 41,000 41,000 Total Dial -A -Taxi Program 31,952 25,000 13,487 41,000 41,000 179 POLICE DEPARTMENT L. A. IMPACT SOURCE OF FUNDS: ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: L. A. Impact is a regional crime suppression team that targets drug trafficking and other major felons. The team is made up of officers of the police departments of Los Angeles County. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private EXPLANATION Space Needs Study $20,000 180 170 Asset Seizure/Forfeiture Fund 2103 L. A. Impact 2103-4100 Personal Services 2103-4102 Regular Salaries 2103-4105 Special Duty Pay 2103-4180 Retirement 2103-4187 Uniform Allowance 2103-4188 Employee Benefits 2103-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 2103-4200 Contract Services 2103-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 2103-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 2103-5403 Vehicles Total Equipment/Fumiture Total L. A. Impact City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 0 70,152 41,379 70,152 0 0 5,256 2,979 5,256 0 0 38,088 22,405 38,088 0 0 700 408 700 0 0 10,115 4,207 10,115 0 0 1,104 693 1,104 0 0 125,415 72,071 125,415 0 0 0 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000 16,000 0 0 0 0 16,000 0 0 0 0 16,000 125,415 72,071 125,415 20,000 181 POLICE DEPARTMENT TASKFORCE FOR REGIONAL AUTOTHEFT PREVENTION (TRAP) SOURCE OF FUNDS: TASKFORCE FOR REGIONAL AUTOTHEFT PREVENTION 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Funds provided by a $1 fee on vehicle registration implemented by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors for a program to deter, investigate and prosecute vehicle theft in Los Angeles County. OBJECT CODES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Police Officer POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 1.00 1.00 TOTAL 1.00 1.00 182 City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 156 Taskforce for Regional Autotheft Prevention Fund (TRAP) 2115 T.R.A.P. Taskforce 2115-4100 Personal Services 2115-4102 Regular Salaries 58,949 64,296 38,069 64,296 65,280 2115-4105 Special Duty Pay 5,107 5,256 2,979 5,256 5,112 2115-4106 Regular Overtime 9,966 5,000 0 5,000 5,000 2115-4180 Retirement 26,006 35,157 20,748 35,157 45,137 2115-4187 Uniform Allowance 700 700 408 700 700 2115-4188 Employee Benefits 10,486 11,792 6,513 11,792 12,198 2115-4189 Medicare Benefits 985 1,092 601 1,092 1,104 Total Personal Services 112,199 123,293 69,318 123,293 134,531 2115-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2115-4326 Prior Year Expense Total Materials/Supplies/Other Total T.R.A.P. Taskforce (97) 0 0 0 0 (97) 0 0 0 0 112,102 123,293 69,318 123,293 134,531 183 This page intentionally left blank 184 0 al W IN 110 a. — 111111 — — — NW — .. M. air !s MN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND ENGINEERING DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and management of capital improvement projects. OBJECT CODES 4102 POSITION SUMMARY REGULAR SALARIES Public Works Director Assistant Engineer Associate Engineer Public Works Superintendent Public Works Inspector Administrative Assistant Clerk Typist TOTAL 4112 PART-TIME/TEMPORARY GIS Intern TOTAL GRAND TOTAL CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.60 1.00 0.70 0.50 0.00 2.20 0.10 0.60 1.00 0.70 4.40 5.10 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 4.40 5.60 84% of two Associate Engineers and 20% of Clerk Typist salaries are charged to Capital Improvement Projects. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Engineering Consultant $9,200 Phone Maintenance 2,415 Copy Services - Public Works Commission 9,000 Pager Service 50 Office Machine Maintenance 192 Secretarial Services - Public Works Commission 4,800 Total $25,657 5402 Equipment — More Than $1,000 Mobile Plan Center $2,000 186 001 General Fund 4202 Public Works Administration City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 4202-4100 Personal Services 4202-4102 Regular Salaries 143,151 147,822 90,468 147,822 228,105 4202-4106 Regular Overtime 2,594 7,500 1,636 7,500 7,500 4202-4111 Accrual Cash In 4,435 5,361 3,122 5,361 5,824 4202-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0 0 0 0 15,000 4202-4180 Retirement 10,700 16,781 10,274 16,781 50,707 4202-4188 Employee Benefits 17,918 18,885 10,928 18,885 29,489 4202-4189 Medicare Benefits 2,166 2,145 1,388 2,145 4,523 Total Personal Services 180,964 198,494 117,816 198,494 341,148 4202-4200 Contract Services 4202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 16,252 35,851 10,658 35,500 25,657 4202-4251 Contract Service/Govt 150 0 0 0 0 Total Contract Services 16,402 35,851 10,658 35,500 25,657 4202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4202-4304 Telephone 17,546 17,600 8,183 17,600 19,000 4202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 11,420 7,500 5,797 7,500 9,500 4202-4314 Uniforms 5,538 8,000 2,919 8,000 8,000 4202-4315 Membership 856 1,500 1,073 1,500 1,760 4202-4317 Conference/Training 7,931 7,007 618 7,000 7,900 4202-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 49,332 81,843 47,740 81,843 87,986 4202-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 12,596 15,144 8,834 15,144 17,658 4202-4396 Insurance User Charges 66,729 70,434 41,090 70,434 71,395 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 171,948 209,028 116,254 209,021 223,199 4202-5400 Equipment/Furniture 4202-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 1,968 0 0 0 0 4202-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 1,376 0 0 0 2,000 Total Equipment/Furniture 3,344 0 0 0 2,000 Total Public Works Administration 372,658 443,373 244,728 443,015 592,004 187 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BEVERAGE RECYCLING GRANT SOURCE OF FUNDS: GRANTS FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Funds received from the State of California, Department of Conservation are used for approved beverage container recycling and/or litter clean up activities. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Services, Private EXPLANATION Publicity and Education Expenses $5,374 188 150 Grants Fund 3102 Sewers/Beverage Recycle Grant 3102-4200 Contract Services 3102-4201 Contract Sery/Private Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 4,431 12,449 0 12,449 5,374 4,431 12,449 0 12,449 5,374 Total Sewers/Beverage Recycle Grant 4,431 12,449 0 12,449 5,374 189 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Building Maintenance Division is responsible for custodial care and maintenance of all City buildings, ensuring that all buildings remain in a neat and sanitary condition on a day-to- day basis. POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER OBJECT AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED CODES 04-05 05-06 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Public Works Director 0.00 0.05 Associate Engineer 0.00 0.10 Public Works Superintendent 0.15 0.15 Public Works Crewleader 0.40 0.50 Maintenance II 1.00 2.00 TOTAL 1.55 2.80 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Janitorial Services $105,000 Elevator Maintenance - City Hall 2,000 Pest Control - All City Buildings 7,100 Specialized Building Repairs 5,000 Service/Inspection Fire Extinguishers 1,500 Additional Pest Control Services 1,500 Total $122,100 5401 Equipment— Less Than $1,000 Sawz-all $200 Cordless Drill 380 Hammer Drill 250 Mobile Scaffolding 450 Total $1,280 190 001 General Fund 4204 Building Maintenance City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 4204-4100 Personal Services 4204-4102 Regular Salaries 71,176 83,292 36,323 83,292 146,841 4204-4106 Regular Overtime 3,547 2,500 1,186 2,500 2,500 4204-4111 Accrual Cash In 5,866 3,164 2,202 3,164 3,437 4204-4180 Retirement 5,359 9,521 4,165 9,521 32,898 4204-4188 Employee Benefits 11,733 15,335 6,519 15,335 27,879 4204-4189 Medicare Benefits 0 320 11 320 1,293 Total Personal Services 97,681 114,132 50,406 114,132 214,848 4204-4200 Contract Services 4204-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 142,470 171,100 79,619 171,100 122,100 142,470 171,100 79,619 171,100 122,100 4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4204-4303 Utilities 130,066 136,026 62,308 126,950 134,860 4204-4309 Maintenance Materials 23,058 26,000 15,721 26,000 26,000 4204-4321 Building Sfty/Security 3,421 6,000 1,546 6,000 6,000 4204-4390 Computer Replacement Chrgs 0 4,450 2,597 4,450 4,450 4204-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 10,063 8,095 4,578 8,095 10,416 4204-4396 Insurance User Charges 13,175 12,530 7,308 12,530 24,567 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 179,783 193,101 94,058 184,025 206,293 4204-5400 Equipment/Fumiture 4204-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 0 0 0 0 1,280 4204-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 4,911 0 0 0 0 Total Equipment/Furniture 4,911 0 0 0 1,280 Total Building Maintenance 424,845 478,333 224,083 469,257 544,521 191 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Public Works Department staff administers several contracts in the downtown area. OBJECT CODES 4102 POSITION SUMMARY REGULAR SALARIES Public Works Director Associate Engineer Public Works Superintendent Public Works Crewleader TOTAL CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 0.10 0.20 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.20 0.05 0.20 0.40 0.50 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Downtown Cleaning/Sweeping Downtown Area Steam Cleaning Palm Tree Fertilization/Maintenance, Quarterly Root Injection Fertilization Tree Trimming Landscape Maintenance Downtown Median Maintenance Hermosa and Lower Pier Avenue Additional Cleaning Services for Events Not Included in Special Events Rental of One-man Bucket Truck Total 4319 Special Events Installation/Removal of Holiday Flags, Holiday Decorations Palm Tree Light Maintenance Unspecified Events New Year's Celebration Rental Lights/Toilets - New Year's Eve Extra Clean Up - New Year's Eve St. Patrick's Day Parade Additional Rental Lights/Toilets Total $109,110 30,650 2,400 2,472 11,124 17,000 1,500 $174,256 $8,540 2,221 2,500 25,000 500 500 15,000 2,200 $56,461 192 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund 3301 Downtown Enhancement City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 3301-4100 Personal Services 3301-4102 Regular Salaries 33,914 35,647 21,353 35,647 37,210 3301-4106 Regular Overtime 812 1,200 324 1,200 1,200 3301-4111 Accrual Cash In 1,003 1,933 1,324 1,933 3,293 3301-4180 Retirement 2,540 4,013 2,405 4,013 8,302 3301-4188 Employee Benefits 4,248 4,441 2,557 4,441 5,041 3301-4189 Medicare Benefits 412 422 295 422 401 Total Personal Services 42,929 47,656 28,258 47,656 55,447 3301-4200 Contract Services 3301-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 150,375 155,361 79,906 155,361 174,256 150,375 155,361 79,906 155,361 174,256 3301-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3301-4309 Maintenance Materials 985 2,000 409 2,000 2,000 3301-4319 Special Events 42,136 56,340 36,836 56,340 56,461 3301-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0 401 231 401 466 3301-4396 Insurance User Charges 2,897 3,061 1,785 3,061 4,728 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 46,018 61,802 39,261 61,802 63,655 3301-4900 Depreciation 3301-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equip 1,318 1,328 0 1,318 1,318 3301-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs 0 3,830 0 700 8,000 Total Depreciation 1,318 5,158 0 2,018 9,318 Total Downtown Enhancement 240,640 269,977 147,425 266,837 302,676 193 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LIFEGUARD SERVICES AND BEACH MAINTENANCE DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: : Contract lifeguard services and beach maintenance provided by the County of Los Angeles. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4251 Contract Services, Government Lifeguard Services and Beach Maintenance, Fifth of Five Annual Payments for 1996-97 $55,000 194 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund 3307 Lifeguard Service/Beach Maintenance 3307-4200 Contract Services 3307-4251 Contract Services/Govt Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 Total Lifeguard Serv/Beach Maint 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 195 I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Street Lighting Division is responsible for maintenance and installation of Citywide street lighting, acts as liaison with the electric utility and maintains aesthetically pleasing landscaping for City median areas. POSITION SUMMARY I CITY MANAGER OBJECT AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED CODES 04-05 05-06 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Public Works Director 0.20 0.05 Associate Engineer 0.30 0.10 Public Works Superintendent 0.20 0.10 Public Works Crewleader 0.30 0.45 Maintenance II 2.00 1.00 TOTAL 3.00 1.70 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT I CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Contract Median Landscape Maintenance $39,243 Paint Light Poles on Hermosa Avenue 12,000 Electrical Repairs 2,000 Total $53,243 4251 Contract Services, Government Caltrans Highway Agreement $14,000 Median Maintenance, Artesia Boulevard 5,200 Los Angeles County Tax Collection 2,500 Total $21,700 I t t 196 105 Lighting/Landscaping District Fund 2601 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 2601-4100 Personal Services 2601-4102 Regular Salaries 2601-4106 Regular Overtime 2601-4111 Accrual Cash In 2601-4180 Retirement 2601-4188 Employee Benefits 2601-4189 Medicare Benefits Total Personal Services 2601-4200 Contract Services 2601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2601-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 163,574 171,980 101,294 171,980 91,939 3,215 4,000 2,435 4,000 4,000 9,680 6,239 8,829 6,239 6,779 12,242 19,571 11,529 19,571 20,580 26,696 23,058 14,780 23,058 14,523 2,282 2,266 1,502 2,266 1,364 217,689 227,114 140,369 227,114 139,185 39,059 43,600 15,725 43,600 53,243 10,210 21,700 6,084 21,700 21,700 49,269 65,300 21,809 65,300 74,943 2601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2601-4303 Utilities 148,358 160,135 78,918 163,281 174,345 2601-4309 Maintenance Materials 26,198 26,177 7,033 26,177 28,300 2601-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 41,819 33,893 19,768 33,893 39,052 2601-4396 Insurance User Charges 36,192 39,136 22,827 39,136 27,595 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 252,567 259,341 128,546 262,487 269,292 Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 519,525 551,755 290,724 554,901 483,420 197 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PARKS DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Department provides cost effective landscape maintenance and aesthetically pleasing landscape for City parks; maintains upkeep of irrigation systems in City parks and maintains and replaces play equipment as needed. POSITION SUMMARY OBJECT CODES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Public Works Director Associate Engineer Public Works Superintendent Public Works Crewleader Maintenance II TOTAL CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.70 1.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.50 1.00 1.85 1.80 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Parks Maintenance $180,341 Specialized Equipment Rental 3,000 Pier Maintenance 35,570 Tree Trimming, Trees Above 20 Feet (Biennial) 22,248 Backflow Testing 3,000 Additional Landscape Maintenance for South Park 4,000 Replace Windscreens for Tennis Courts at Community Center 5,000 Replace Windscreens for Skateboard Track 1,500 Replace Fencing for Skateboard Track 5,000 Splash Walls on Greenbelt Along Ardmore Drive at Ninth, Tenth and Fifteenth Streets 3,000 Tennis Courts Resurfacing at Clark Field 6,500 Total $269,159 4251 Contract Services, Government Department of Health Services Fee $90 5401 Equipment — Less Than $1,000 Replacement Trash Cans at Tennis Courts $900 5402 Equipment — More Than $1,000 Replacement Playground Equipment for Tot Lot $4,000 Replacement Benches at Community Center And Clark Field Tennis Courts (8) 2,400 Total $6,400 198 001 General Fund 6101 Parks City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 6101-4100 Personal Services 6101-4102 Regular Salaries 100,861 104,318 60,750 104,318 107,450 6101-4106 Regular Overtime 873 2,000 1,230 2,000 2,000 6101-4111 Accrual Cash In 3,653 4,833 2,802 4,833 5,251 6101-4180 Retirement 7,593 11,940 6,954 11,940 24,060 6101-4188 Employee Benefits 14,651 15,906 8,861 15,906 16,353 6101-4189 Medicare Benefits 573 560 378 560 641 Total Personal Services 128,204 139,557 80,975 139,557 155,755 6101-4200 Contract Services 6101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 245,239 215,542 103,670 215,452 269,159 6101-4251 Contract Service/Govt 84 0 90 90 90 Total Contract Services 245,323 215,542 103,760 215,542 269,249 6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 6101-4303 Utilities 135,821 130,000 62,859 126,684 141,672 6101-4309 Maintenance Materials 21,665 27,400 12,672 27,400 27,400 6101-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 19,176 21,450 12,509 21,450 24,234 6101-4396 Insurance User Charges 18,200 17,683 10,318 17,683 21,268 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 194,862 196,533 98,358 193,217 214,574 6101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 6101-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 0 0 0 0 900 6101-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 17,261 2,215 1,452 2,215 6,400 Total Equipment/Furniture 17,261 2,215 1,452 2,215 7,300 Total Parks 585,650 553,847 284,545 550,531 646,878 199 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT NORTH PIER PARKING STRUCTURE AND PARKING LOT A SOURCE OF FUNDS: DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: : Administration of North Pier Parking Structure, Downtown Parking Lot A and Payment of the County's share of the Parking Structure Revenue. NORTH PIER PARKING STRUCTURE OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Earthquake Insurance $13,875 Elevator Maintenance 5,500 Elevator Maintenance Beyond Preventative 2,000 Elevator Lighting System Maintenance 1,200 Landscape Maintenance Around Parking Structure 500 Annual Maintenance for Electrical and Emergency Lighting Systems 2,000 Steam Cleaning Parking Structure Stairwells 3,000 Repair and Maintenance Air Conditioning System 2,000 Repair and Testing of Fire Line Backflow Device and Valves 500 Total $30,575 4231 Contract Services, Parking Lot Parking Structure Operator Operator $194,611 DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT A OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4231 Contract Services, Parking Lot Lot A Operator Operator $148,316 COUNTY SHARE OF PARKING STRUCTURE REVENUE OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Government Payment to LA County, Share of Parking Structure Revenue $190,833 200 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund 3304 North Pier Parking Structure 3304-4200 Contract Services 3304-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3304-4231 Contract Serv/Pkg Lot Operator Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 20,615 29,761 17,818 29,761 30,575 168,441 204,036 86,856 172,670 194,611 189,056 233,797 104,674 202,431 225,186 3304-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3304-4303 Utilities 27,697 37,000 14,115 26,830 28,526 3304-4304 Telephone 436 450 185 450 450 3304-4309 Maintenance Materials 1,322 4,100 1,310 4,100 4,100 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 29,455 41,550 15,610 31,380 33,076 3304-4900 Depreciation 3304-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs 112,500 112,500 0 112,500 112,500 Total Depreciation 112,500 112,500 0 112,500 112,500 Total North Pier Parking Structure 331,011 387,847 120,284 346,311 370,762 3305 Downtown Parking Lot A 3305-4200 Contract Services 3305-4231 Contract Serv/Pkg Lot Operator 136,396 147,674 69,394 137,390 148,316 Total Contract Services 136,396 147,674 69,394 137,390 148,316 Total Downtown Parking Lot A 136,396 147,674 69,394 137,390 148,316 3306 Co. Share Pkg Structure Revenue 3306-4200 Contract Services 3306-4251 Contract Services/Govt 201,576 202,380 0 203,030 190,833 Total Contract Services 201,576 202,380 0 203,030 190,833 Total Co. Share Pkg Structure Revenue 201,576 202,380 0 203,030 190,833 201 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SEWERS/STORM DRAIN DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: SEWER FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Sewer and Storm Drain Division is responsible for maintenance of sewers, storm drains, City sanitary sewer pump stations and inspection of all sewer demos and sewer lateral hook ups. OBJECT CODES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Public Works Director Associate Engineer Public Works Superintendent Public Works Inspector Clerk Typist Public Works Crewleader Maintenance II TOTAL 4112 PART-TIME/TEMPORARY Maintenance I POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 0.40 0.50 0.20 0.40 0.50 0.60 1.00 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.40 0.50 0.45 1.00 3.60 2.85 1.00 0.00 TOTAL 1.00 0.00 GRAND TOTAL 4.60 2.85 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Hydro Flushing $125,030 Storm Drain Management Services 54,270 Storm Drain Filter Cleaning 17,160 Video Taping of Storm Drain System 7,000 Dig Alert 1,500 Monitoring of Water Quality 9,500 Outreach Program 5,000 Implementation of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 10,000 Emergencies 20,000 Total $249,460 4251 Contract Services, Government Catch Basin Clean Out Pump Station Repairs/Maintenance Water Discharge Requirement Annual Fee Sewer Connection Fee Total $500 20,000 4,500 12,000 $37,000 202 160 Sewer Fund 3102 Sewers/Storm Drains City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 3102-4100 Personal Services 3102-4102 Regular Salaries 210,388 219,710 106,100 219,710 158,079 3102-4106 Regular Overtime 3,497 4,800 1,436 4,800 5,600 3102-4111 Accrual Cash In 7,059 6,415 4,674 6,415 6,970 3102-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0 13,000 6,789 13,000 0 3102-4180 Retirement 15,673 25,350 11,992 25,350 35,372 3102-4188 Employee Benefits 31,534 37,332 18,082 37,332 26,352 3102-4189 Medicare Benefits 2,677 4,165 2,034 4,165 2,222 Total Personal Services 270,828 310,772 151,107 310,772 234,595 3102-4200 Contract Services 3102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3102-4251 Contract Service/Govt Total Contract Services 194,521 255,460 116,972 255,460 249,460 17,723 25,000 10,618 37,000 37,000 212,244 280,460 127,590 292,460 286,460 3102-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3102-4303 Utilities 971 1,700 421 960 1,025 3102-4309 Maintenance Materials 11,732 11,657 3,382 11,657 12,600 3102-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 36,209 34,796 20,307 34,796 46,227 3102-4396 Insurance User Charges 53,682 57,353 33,453 37,353 52,280 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 102,594 105,506 57,563 84,766 112,132 Total Sewers/Storm Drains 585,666 696,738 336,260 687,998 633,187 203 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREET MAINTENANCE/TRAFFIC SAFETY DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND; STATE GAS TAX TUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Street Maintenance Division is responsible for maintaining the public right of way to ensure pedestrian and vehicle safety. The division repairs and maintains streets, alleys, sidewalks, curbs and gutters; sweeping of streets and alleys is also performed. The Traffic Safety Division ensures the installation and maintenance of all mandated traffic control devices and necessary appurtenances, such as street name signs and warning devices. OBJECT CODES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Public Works Director Associate Engineer Public Works Superintendent Public Works Crewleader Maintenance II Maintenance I TOTAL POSITION SUMMARY CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.95 2.00 1.00 0.15 0.10 0.20 0.90 2.00 1.00 4.35 4.35 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Street Sweeping $209,154 Traffic Engineering 23,000 Traffic Signal Maintenance 3,000 Holiday Flag Installation and Removal 3,000 Emergency Traffic Signal Maintenance 8,000 Emergency Street Repairs 10,000 Hazardous Waste Removal 3,000 Total $259,154 4251 Contract Services, Government Air Quality Management District Equipment Permit $560 5402 Equipment — More Than $1,000 Concrete Mixer $3,800 5405 Equipment — More Than $5,000 Pavement Breaker for Use with Existing Backhoe $14,300 204 001 General Fund 3104 Traffic Safetv/Street Maintenance City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 3104-4100 Personal Services 3104-4102 Regular Salaries 234,492 245,634 141,932 245,634 237,127 3104-4106 Regular Overtime 5,130 5,000 2,551 5,000 5,000 3104-4111 Accrual Cash In 5,703 7,577 5,667 7,577 18,949 3104-4180 Retirement 17,592 28,018 16,226 28,018 53,060 3104-4188 Employee Benefits 32,541 35,071 19,134 35,071 34,327 3104-4189 Medicare Benefits 919 947 569 947 864 Total Personal Services 296,377 322,247 186,079 322,247 349,327 3104-4200 Contract Services 3104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 211,819 262,154 \ 100,566 262,154 259,154 3104-4251 Contract Service/Govt 6,775 560 0 560 560 Total Contract Services 218,594 262,714 100,566 262,714 259,714 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3104-4303 Utilities 15,019 16,920 5,834 13,250 13,991 3104-4309 Maintenance Materials 53,010 61,850 24,133 61,850 61,850 3104-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 24,597 31,264 18,235 31,264 36,743 3104-4396 Insurance User Charges 106,450 109,421 63,826 109,421 111,365 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 199,076 219,455 112,028 215,785 223,949 3104-5400 Equipment/Furniture 3104-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 0 0 0 0 3,800 3104-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0 0 0 0 14,300 Total Equipment/Fumiture 0 0 0 0 18,100 Total Traffic Safety/Street Maintenance 714,047 804,416 398,673 800,746 851,090 205 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREET MAINTENANCE/TRAFFIC SAFETY DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: GENERAL FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Traffic Safety Division is responsible for maintaining the public right of way to ensure pedestrian and vehicle safety. As a result of the State of California relinquishment of Artesia Boulevard, the City is responsible for maintenance of all traffic signals located on Artesia Boulevard within the city limits. City responsibility for Artesia Boulevard maintenance became effective January 2004. POSITION SUMMARY OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Government Los Angeles County, Maintenance of Traffic Signals on Artesia Boulevard at Meadows Avenue and Prospect Avenue $4,000 206 302 Artesia Blvd Relinquishment Fund 3104 Traffic Safety/Street Maintenance 3104-4200 Contract Services 3104-4251 Contract Services/Gov't Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 0 9,000 598 2,500 4,000 0 9,000 598 2,500 4,000 Total Traffic Safety/Street Maintenance 0 9,000 598 2,500 4,000 207 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT USED OIL BLOCK GRANT DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: CALIFORNIA USED OIL BLOCK GRANT 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This division accounts for costs related to the development, printing and distribution of promotional and educational materials for the Used Oil Recycling Program and promotion of nearby disposal facilities. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Publicity and Educational Materials Used to Promote Program $6,088 208 160 Sewer Fund 3105 Used Oil Block Grant 3105-4200 Contract Services 3105-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 6,087 5,400 2,604 5,400 6,088 6,087 5,400 2,604 5,400 6,088 Total Used Oil Block Grant 6,087 5,400 2,604 5,400 6,088 209 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT SERVICE DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS: EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Equipment Service Division provides for centralized repair and maintenance of all City vehicles and equipment. Activities range from minor repairs to major overhauls. The Division also evaluates the service life and advises vehicle replacement needs. POSITION SUMMARY OBJECT CODES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Public Works Director Public Works Superintendent Senior Equipment Mechanic Equipment Mechanic TOTAL CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED 04-05 05-06 0.00 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.05 0.05 1.00 1.00 2.05 2.10 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Services, Private Industrial Waste Removal $2,500 ALLDATA Software for Vehicle Repair 2,195 Machine Parts Cleaning 500 Total $5,195 4251 Contract Services, Government Miscellaneous Equipment Permits/Fees $500 5402 Equipment— More Than $1,000 Advanced Battery/Electrical System Analyzer $1,500 Master Scan and Scope Kit 3,000 Combination Brake Lathe 5,000 Total $9,500 210 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 4206 Equipment Service City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 4206-4100 Personal Services 4206-4102 Regular Salaries 78,565 89,755 37.951 80,005 114,109 4206-4106 Regular Overtime 1.118 3.000 1,049 2,100 2,500 4206-4111 Accrual Cash In 1.916 4.218 2.279 4.218 4.583 4206-4112 Part Time/Temporary 21,296 17,019 17.018 17,018 0 4206-4180 Retirement 5,917 12,195 4,343 9.150 25.554 4206-4188 Employee Benefits 9,201 13,731 4,575 9.683 18,829 4206-4189 Medicare Benefits 1,900 604 1,302 1,670 813 Total Personal Services 119,913 140,522 68,517 123,844 166,388 4206-4200 Contract Services 4206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2,104 6.520 4,802 6.520 5,195 4206-4251 Contract Services/Govt 211 500 493 500 500 Total Contract Services 2,315 7,020 5,295 7,020 5,695 4206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4206-4309 Maintenance Materials 3.019 3.500 2.409 3.500 3.500 4206-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 1,013 1.600 0 1,100 1.600 4206-4311 Auto Maintenance 792 1,000 584 750 1,000 4206-4396 Insurance User Charges 13,245 14.287 8,337 14.287 22,891 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 18,069 20,387 11,330 19,637 28,991 4206-4900 Depreciation 4206-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 791 773 0 791 791 Total Depreciation 791 773 0 791 791 4206-5400 Equipment/Furniture 4206-5401 Equip -Less Than $1,000 854 0 0 0 0 4206-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 1,025 0 0 0 9,500 Total Equipment/Furniture 1,879 0 0 0 9,500 Total Equipment Service 142,967 168,702 85,142 151,292 211,365 211 This page intentionally left blank 212 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND DEPARTMENTAL EQUIPMENT AND MAINTENANCE SOURCE OF FUNDS: INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 2005-2006 BUDGET DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Fuel costs, vehicle maintenance costs, heavy equipment, vehicle and business machine purchases are budgeted by department in the Equipment Replacement Fund. Computer purchases are budgeted in Information Systems Division. Vehicle, computer and business machine replacement schedules are located in the Appendix. New purchases, as opposed to replacement purchases (per the replacement schedules), and contract services are listed below. Police Department computer equipment purchases are budgeted under the Police Department in the Equipment Replacement Fund rather than in Information Systems since they purchase their own hardware, as specified by the contract for the police records management system. OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT: 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS 4201 Contract Services, Private DEPARTMENT: 2101 POLICE 4201 Contract Services, Private DEPARTMENT: 2201 FIRE 4201 Contract Services, Private 4311 Auto Maintenance Copier Maintenance (2 Canon Postage Meter Rental Postage Scale Maintenance Postage Machine Maintenance Fax Machine Maintenance Copier Maintenance (Minolta Machine) Total' Machines) Computer Maintenance Copier Maintenance Total Annual Preventative Maintenance for Department Vehicles Copier Maintenance Total Unexpected/Necessary Repairs of Department Apparatus Replacement LED Emergency Response Lightbars for El 1 and E12 Total DEPARTMENT: 2601 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS DIVISION 4201 Contract Services, Private Annual Inspection of High -Lift Truck $5,500 700 150 550 460 2,700 $10,060 $10,000 2,000 $12,000 $28,000 800 $28,800 $25,000 3,100 $28,100 $3,000 DEPARTMENT: 3102 SEWERS/STORM DRAIN DIVISION 4201 Contract Services, Private Quarterly Preventative Maintenance for Caterpillar $4,000 213 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND DEPARTMENTAL EQUIPMENT AND MAINTENANCE SOURCE OF FUNDS: INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 2005-2006 BUDGET OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS (Continued) OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT: 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES 4201 Contract Services, Private Copier Maintenance $400 Ticketwriter Repairs Outside of Warranty 500 Total $900 DEPARTMENT: 4202 ADMINISTRATION AND ENGINEERING DIVISION 5402 Equipment — More Than $1,000 Memory Upgrades for Department Computers $1,000 DVD Burners (3) 250 Total $1,250 DEPARTMENT: 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4201 Contract Services, Private AudioNideo Maintenance, Council Chambers $4,000 DEPARTMENT: 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4201 Contract Services, Private Copier Maintenance $780 5401 Equipment — Less Than $1,000 Flat Screen Monitor for Front Registration Counter $500 214 City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 1101 City Council 1101-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 15,611 5,204 Total Depreciation 15,611 5,204 Total City Council 15,611 5,204 0 0 0 15,612 15,612 15,612 15,612 15,612 15,612 1208 General Appropriations 1208-4200 Contract Services 1208-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 8,247 5,834 8,247 10,060 Total Contract Services 0 8,247 5,834 8,247 10,060 1208-4900 Depreciation 1208-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 8,712 12,488 0 12,488 12,488 Total Depreciation 8,712 12,488 0 12,488 12,488 1208-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1208-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 0 36,760 0 36,760 0 Total Equipment/Furniture 0 36,760 0 36,760 0 Total General Appropriations 8,712 57,495 5,834 57,495 22,548 2101 Police 2101-4200 Contract Services 2101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 6,450 1,591 6,450 12,000 Total Contract Services 0 6,450 1,591 6,450 12,000 2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 2101-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2101-4900 Depreciation 2101-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 42,499 16,029 0 42,499 42,499 2101-4902 DepreciationNehicles 133,860 104,622 0 128,000 128,000 Total Depreciation 176,359 120,651 0 170,499 170,499 2101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2101-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 (5,349) 0 1,326 1,326 8,780 2101-5403 Vehicles (5,925) 135,578 130,819 130,819 116,240 Total Equipment/Furniture (11,274) 135,578 132,145 132,145 125,020 46,964 39,000 28,367 48,500 48,000 39,488 32,000 18,373 32,000 32,000 86,452 71,000 46,740 80,500 80,000 Total Police 251,537 333,679 180,476 389,594 387,519 215 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 2201 Fire 2201-4200 Contract Services 2201-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 2201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2201-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 2201-4311 Auto Maintenance City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 0 28,800 6,849 28,800 28,800 0 28,800 6,849 28,800 28,800 9,525 10,645 5,676 10,645 10,645 5,495 46,379 38,095 46,379 49,479 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 15,020 57,024 43,771 57,024 60,124 2201-4900 Depreciation 2201-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 929 480 0 929 929 2201-4902 DepreciationNehicles 68,557 72,421 0 72,421 72,421 Total Depreciation 69,486 72,901 0 73,350 73,350 2201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2201-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 0 6,965 0 6,965 0 2201-5403 Vehicles 1,270 170,335 0 170,335 0 Total Equipment/Furniture 1,270 177,300 0 177,300 0 Total Fire 85,776 336,025 50,620 336,474 162,274 2601 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 2601-4200 Contract Services 2601-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services 2601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 2601-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2601-4900 Depreciation 2601-4902 DepreciationNehicles Total Depreciation 2,187 2,000 0 3,000 3,000 2,187 2,000 0 3,000 3,000 2,466 3,800 1,821 3,800 3,800 2,199 1,560 4 1,560 1,560 4,665 5,360 1,825 5,360 5,360 13,064 16,145 0 13,064 13,064 13,064 16,145 0 13,064 13,064 2601-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2601-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0 0 0 0 44,101 Total Equipment/Fumiture 0 0 0 0 44,101 Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 19,916 23,505 1,825 21,424 65,525 216 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 3102 Sewers/Storm Drains 3102-4200 Contract Services 3102-4201 Contract Serv/Private Total Contract Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 2,641 4,000 913 4,000 4,000 2,641 4,000 913 4,000 4,000 3102-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3102-4309 Maintenance Materials 249 2,000 6 1,000 2,000 3102-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 1,024 1,800 361 1,800 1,800 3102-4311 Auto Maintenance 2,232 2,300 189 2,000 2,300 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3,505 6,100 556 4,800 6,100 3102-4900 Depreciation 3102-4902 DepreciationNehicles 12,859 14,279 0 12,859 12,859 Total Depreciation 12,859 14,279 0 12,859 12,859 3102-5400 Equipment/Furniture 3102-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 0 0 0 173,525 0 3102-5403 Vehicles 0 0 0 0 8,400 3102-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0 0 0 0 44,101 Total Equipment/Fumiture 0 0 0 173,525 52,501 Total Sewers/Storm Drains 19,005 24,379 1,469 195,184 75,460 3104 Traffic Safety/Street Maintenance 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3104-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 3,786 4,350 2,120 4,350 4,350 3104-4311 Auto Maintenance 918 1,600 391 1,600 1,600 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4,704 5,950 2,511 5,950 5,950 3104-4900 Depreciation 3104-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 686 229 0 686 686 3104-4902 DepreciationNehicles 13,842 15,149 0 13,842 13,842 Total Depreciation 14,528 15,378 0 14,528 14,528 Total Traffic Safety/Street Maintenance 19,232 21,328 2,511 20,478 20,478 217 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 3302 Community Services City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 3302-4200 Contract Services 3302-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 900 123 900 900 Total Contract Services 0 900 123 900 900 3302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3302-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 3302-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3302-4900 Depreciation 3302-4902 DepreciationNehicles Total Depreciation 7,533 6,500 3,452 6,500 6,500 8,321 10,000 2,778 6,000 10,000 15,854 16,500 6,230 12,500 16,500 30,375 24,126 0 30,375 30,375 30,375 24,126 0 30,375 30,375 3302-5400 Equipment/Furniture 3302-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 0 20,763 9,011 20,763 0 3302-5403 Vehicles 0 0 0 0 15,751 Total Equipment/Furniture 0 20,763 9,011 20,763 15,751 Total Community Services 46,229 62,289 15,364 64,538 63,526 4201 Community Development/Building 4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4201-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 1,508 1,200 984 1,200 1,200 4201-4311 Auto Maintenance 1,445 800 1,068 800 800 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4201-4900 Depreciation 4201-4902 DepreciationNehicles Total Depreciation 2,953 2,000 2,052 2,000 2,000 7,516 8,023 0 7,516 7,516 7,516 8,023 0 7,516 7,516 Total Community Development/Building 10,469 10,023 2,052 9,516 9,516 218 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 4202 Public Works Administration City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 4202-4200 Contract Services 4202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 15,644 7,500 15,644 0 Total Contract Services 0 15,644 7,500 15,644 0 4202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4202-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 1,549 1,500 673 1,500 1,800 4202-4311 Auto Maintenance 1,420 1,200 323 1,200 1,200 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,969 2,700 996 2,700 3,000 4202-4900 Depreciation 4202-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 4,563 5,423 0 4,563 4,563 4202-4902 DepreciationNehicles 4,450 7,355 0 4,450 4,450 Total Depreciation 9,013 12,778 0 9,013 9,013 4202-5400 Equipment/Furniture 4202-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 0 0 0 0 1,250 4202-5403 Vehicles 0 26,250 0 26,250 12,600 Total Equipment/Furniture 0 26,250 0 26,250 13,850 Total Public Works Administration 11,982 57,372 8,496 53,607 25,863 4204 Building Maintenance 4204-4200 Contract Services 4204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 3,954 0 4,000 4,000 Total Contract Services 0 3,954 0 4,000 4,000 4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4204-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 367 700 169 700 700 4204-4311 Auto Maintenance 542 2,500 1,851 2,500 2,500 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 909 3,200 2,020 3,200 3,200 4204-4900 Depreciation 4204-4902 DepreciationNehides 3,306 3,360 0 3,306 3,306 Total Depreciation 3,306 3,360 0 3,306 3,306 4204-5600 Buildings/Improvements 4204-5602 Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs 0 4,546 4,545 4,546 0 Total Buildings/Improvements 0 4,546 4,545 4,546 0 Total Building Maintenance 4,215 15,060 6,565 15,052 10,506 219 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 4601 Community Resources City of Hermosa Beach Department Expenditure Detail 2005-2006 Budget 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 Total Expended YTD Year End Department Expended Budget (Thru Jan) Estimate Request 4601-4200 Contract Services 4601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 780 686 780 780 Total Contract Services 0 780 686 780 780 4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 4601-4311 Auto Maintenance Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4601-4900 Depreciation 4601-4902 DepreciationNehicles 1,326 800 939 1,400 1,400 709 2,500 141 500 2,500 2,035 3,300 1,080 1,900 3,900 5,773 5,577 0 5,773 5,773 Total Depreciation 5,773 5,577 0 5,773 5,773 4601-5400 Equipment/Furniture 4601-5402 Equip -More Than $1,000 0 6,965 0 6,965 500 Total Equipment/Furniture 0 6,965 0 6,965 500 Total Community Resources 7,808 16,622 1,766 15,418 10,953 6101 Parks 6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 6101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 2,379 3,000 1,725 3,000 3,000 6101-4311 Auto Maintenance 437 800 227 800 800 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 6101-4900 Depreciation 6101-4902 DepreciationNehicles 2,816 3,800 1,952 3,800 3,800 6,508 7,023 0 6,508 6,508 Total Depreciation 6,508 0 0 6,508 6,508 Total Parks 9,324 0 1,952 10,308 10,308 220 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I Capital Improvement Program NIS 1111 1011- - 1111-- EN 11111 SW 1111 N INN N- - I MI CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 221 This page intentionally left blank 222 IBM au int No NE pot gm ow gm pm mg gm INN OM MN INN WM MN MIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2005-06 PRELIMINARY BUDGET CIP NO. PROJECT NAME State Gas Tax Fund Prop A Open Space Fund Tyco Fund Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 4% Utility Users Tax Fund Building Improvement Fund CDBG Fund Prop C Fund Grant Fund Sewer Fund Fire Protection Fund Capital Improvment Fund Artesia Blvd. Relinquishment Fund Equipment Replacement Fund TOTAL CIP FUNDING 115 121 122 125 126 127 140 146 150 160 180 301 302 715 02-104 Bay View Undergrounding 205,600 205,600 02-106 Beach Drive Undergrounding 107,942 107,942 05-109 Concrete Road Reconstruction at various locations 75,000 75,000 05-110 Slurry/Crack sealing at various 95,000 95,000 04-116 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway 93,000 93,000 04-117 Manhattan Avenue Street Improvements 720,000 720,000 04-118 Strand Bikeway Light Fixture Replacement 10,000 10,000 05-119 Hermosa Ave. - 26th Street to 35th Street, Longfellow, Manhattan to Ingleside 127,000 15,000 142,000 05-120 Street Improvements at Various Locations 1,385,907 235,911 1,621,818 05-121 Street Improvements - Aviation Blvd. Street -Tree Project 151,482 151,482 SUBTOTAL 10,000 93,000 127,000 2,604,449 387,393 3,221,842 00-413 Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Target Areas 2 thru 4 436,000 438,000 874,000 SUBTOTAL 436,000 438,000 874,000 04-535 Clark Field Improvements 106,754 29,889 4,904 133,453 275,000 SUBTOTAL 106,754 29,889 4,904 133,453 275,000 99-610 Fire Station Upstairs Remodel and Addition 25,400 25,400 02-612 Public Works Yard Renovation 241,000 241,000 02-626 Community Center Theatre ADA Uoarades 218,066 218,066 00-630 Municipal Pier, Phase III - Architectural Upgrades 577,733 577,733 99-631 Beach Restrooms Rehabilitation 38,826 38,826 05-633 Re -Roofing of City Buildings 90,000 90,000 02-634 Exterior Paintina/Citv Buildinas 28.000 26.000 SUBTOTAL 577,733 38,826 218.066 25,400 116,000 241,000 1,217,025 FUND TOTALS 10,000 577,733 38,826 106,754 29,889 4,904 218,066 93,000 127,000 436,000 25,400 3,291,902 387,393 241,000 5,587,867 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Street Improvements 301-8104-4201 PROJECT NO./TITLE: 02-104 Bay View Drive Undergrounding Street Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of constructing asphalt overlay of Palm Drive and crack and slurry seal of Bay View Drive and 10th Street. This project will also address the sewer lining of both sewer mains in Palm Drive and Bay View Drive. 0 y E. CYPRESS AVE. I - LOMA DR. LO JUSTIFICATION: The CityDistrict No's contribution2004-2for tounder Assgessment . roundin the overhead utilities on Bay View Drive and adjacent streets. i SUNSET DR. o 1--- 1:11 1 r- A\ F4 MONTEREY BLVD. -r,. BAY VIEW DR. o1 PROJECT MANHATTAN AVE. LOCATION \ STATUS: \ PALM DRIVE I HERMOSA AVE. 14thCT. N L M t M PIER AVE. 12th CT. pz N U N 0 U 0 THE STRAND I I le --1, COST ESTIMATE ICURRENT REQUEST Project Management 10,000 Engineering 15,000 Construction Services 15,600 Construction 150,000 Contingencies 15,000 FUND SOURCE 05-06 - 301 Capital Improvement Fund 205,600 Total 205,600 224 1 1 1 t 1 i 1 0 1 1 1 i 1 1 t 1 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Street Improvements 301-8106-4201 PROJECT NO.ITITLE: 02-106 Beach Drive Undergrounding Street Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 45 This project consists of constructing asphalt 24TH ST overlay of the streets and alleys with reconstruction as necessary. 27 18 m w 17 71 16 ®cn JUSTIFICATION: 0 15 4 < The City's contribution to Assessment 25 District No. 2004-1 for undergrounding the 26 overhead utilities on Beach Drive and 23RD ST adjacent streets. 7 8 9 pi= 6 33 10 4 11 y z 3 12 0 2 13 m 1 14 STATUS: 22ND ST 33 32 31m 30 > 39 Z_ 9 o i 40 28 73 41 7 36 42 t. VI 44 43 21ST ST COST ESTIMATE I CURRENT REQUEST Project Management 5,000 FUND SOURCE 05-06 Engineering 5,000 301 Capital Improvement Fund 107,942 Construction Services 2,500 Construction 86,765 Contingencies 8,677 Total 107,942 225 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: STREET IMPROVEMENTS 301-8109-4201 PROJECT NO./TITLE: CIP 05-109 Street Improvements — Concrete road reconstruction at various locations N/A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Concrete road reconstruction at various locations as designated by the Public Works Director. JUSTIFICATION: Deteriorated streets need reconstruction. STATUS: COST ESTIMATE I CURRENT REQUEST Project Management Engineering Construction Services Construction Contingencies Total 2,625 4,125 4,500 56,250 7,500 FUND SOURCE 05-06 301 Capital Improvement Fund 75,000 75,000 226 1 0 1 1 1 f 1 1 t r 1 1 1 1 t 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: STREET IMPROVEMENTS 301-8110-4201 PROJECT NOJTITLE: CIP 05-110 Street Improvements — Slurry and crack sealing at various locations N /A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Slurry seal pavement at various locations as designated by the Public Works Director. JUSTIFICATION: Slurry sealing provides an emulsified asphalt coating to street surfaces in an effort to extend the life of the pavement. STATUS: COST ESTIMATE I CURRENT REQUEST Project Management Construction Services Construction Contingencies Total 4,750 7,125 74,100 9,025 FUND SOURCE 05-06 301 Capital Improvement Fund 95,000 95,000 227 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Street Improvements 146-8116-4201 PROJECT NO.ITITLE: CIP 04-116 Street Improvements – Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway 1 1 L__1 L___11 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project calls for the reconstruction of existing pavement, curbs, and gutter to correct serious flooding problems, sidewalks to improve pedestrian access, and construct transit facility improvements including bus pads, transit shelters, bicycle racks, and wider sidewalk to meet handicapped access landing for wheelchair lift mechanism on buses. PACIFIC COAST HCNW"Y .L - — '1''�'::'1M-`'"'° JUSTIFICATION: This major arterial street has experienced many street failures, and has been identified by the City's Pavement Management report and via Service Requests as a candidate for reconstruction. y CENTER • $ PROJECT BARO 5T LOCA TIONProgram . s & . CYPRESS AVE I - LOMA OR. gEOMA . SUNSET OFL oR. k MONTEREY BLVD. STATUS: Design is scheduled to begin this year. Construction is scheduled for completion in FY 2006-2007. Prop C funding available July 2005 is $1,108,848 plus the FY 05-06 allocation of $236,094. �$ BAY VIEW DR. � 111111 IIIIIIIIIIW M""""'T"" AVE. ,� HERMOSA AVE. r, n 1-171 I—1 1111 I-1 1- 1 r--1 r --i r1 COST ESTIMATE 1 CURRENT REQUEST Project Management 35,000 Engineering 93,000 Construction Services 100,000 Construction 1,500,000 Contingencies 260,000 FUND SOURCE 05-06 146 Prop C Fund 93,000 Total 1,988,000 Total 93,000 228 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: STREET IMPROVEMENTS 301-8117-4201 PROJECT NOJTITLE: CIP 04-117 Manhattan Avenue Street Improvements �► ��` `O j"S •�� •'�•� 4, v.1.4,\ ♦ PROJECT��.,1 LOCA TION il •• ..'•.,,.. 4 'so • ! e 1 i V vsc- 4 \#s y v ���� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project proposes cold milling of existing pavement, crack sealing and placement of AC overlay on Manhattan Avenue between 1st 1 Street and Greenwich Village. �� � > \ . • o �� ��STATUS: � . 04 - %Alt‘ v ,\Nik, JUSTIFICATION: Street condition warrants rehabilitation. COST ESTIMATE 1 CURRENT REQUEST Engineering Design Survey Construction Services Construction Contingencies 20,000 15,000 25,000 600,000 60,000 FUND SOURCE 05-06 301 Capital Improvement Fund 720,000 Total 720,000 229 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Street Lighting Improvements 115-8118-4201 PROJECT NO.ITITLE: CIP 04-118 Strand Bikeway Light Fixture Replacement N/A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace twelve -year-old Strand light fixtures between Herondo Street and 24th Street. JUSTIFICATION: Replacement of these fixtures is necessary due to the harsh environment that the light fixtures are exposed to. The light fixtures will be replaced with increased energy efficiency lighting fixtures. STATUS: The majority of these fixtures were replaced in FY 04-05. COST ESTIMATE ICURRENT REQUEST Construction Total 56,700 FUND SOURCE 05-06 115 State Gas (TDA- Article 3 Tax Fund 10,000 Local Return Fund) 56,700 Total 10,000 230 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 f CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: STREET IMPROVEMENTS 150-8119-4201 301-8119-4201 PROJECT NO. TITLE: CIP 05-119 Street Improvements — 21St Street from Ardmore to Prospect, Hermosa Avenue from 26th Street to 35th Street and Longfellow Avenue from Manhattan Avenue to Ingleside Avenue =' �, �' �QD��/� 111/...". VQ � & ,0 �` V/ �; ,, �y a r� ammar-�=_ L ` �7 a� !'R•J �deficiencies. t •C' ONS `� IO ti, ��� !1IIIm.. `1 ` �,� ,�, cr. �/ _ �I � O � .. r , ' \I 44 PROJEC m» LOCATION ." = � ° . �� '� '" ti Zbegin O t C /".-,C74. '''l 1 A4, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project proposes the cold milling of existing pavement and placement of AC overlay. It also includes replacement of sub - standard and/or deteriorated PCC sidewalk, curb and gutter. Included in this work is the installation of infiltration basins along Hermosa Avenue in order to mitigate surface runoff and ponding and correction of drainage JUSTIFICATION: Thesestreetshave been identified by the Pavement Management Report as being in need of overlay and slurry seal. Additionally, these roadways are part of Caltrans Highway Performance Monitoring Program (HPMS) and therefore qualify under STP -L funding. HPMS is a federally mandated inventory system and planning tool, designed to assess the nation's highway system. HPMS is used as a management tool by State & Federal governments and local agencies to analyze the system's condition and performance. STATUS: Design to begin FY 05-06. Construction on 21St Street to also begin in. FY 05-06. Construction on Hermosa Avenue and Longfellow Avenue to as STP -L Funds become available. Current funding source reflects an 11.5% City Match. COST ESTIMATE 1 CURRENT REQUEST Construction Support 50,000 Construction 658,712 Contingencies 50,000 Project Management 25,000 Engineering 30,000 FUND SOURCE 05-06 150 STP -L 301 Capital Fund 127,000 Improvement Fund 15,000 Total 813,712 Total 142,000 231 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: STREET IMPROVEMENTS 301-8120-4201 302-8120-4201 PROJECT NO.ITITLE: CIP 05-120 Street Improvements at Various Locations :-i,`- '': -=;`, f..' - '- "yam \`•.\O \ �.. . T. PALM DR '_'+- MOBS- TO 21ST S7T TO 21ST 15i sr '4.`_'� HERMOSA2AY£ TO _ 'E""n°" �` I" JDTH J „ t 24TH PARK 2170 ARDMORE - 4, P`hown 57 rD LONCTEIDN AVEAYE PL Alf TO PCH ST AVE TO PCH 19711 ST PCH TO RHODES 5T _ ....mac. --- •_. -or.' i 3 \\h` , - -= \ > __ , ` , F 1 y — PL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project proposes pavement resurfacing of or application of slurry seal to the streets in the adjacent map. The project will also address limited quantities of deteriorated concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter, and cross gutters. yy I �l , I — �� Y V-- MANHATTAN AVE y SORA .-,-. .. y ir' s MONTEREY OMA J ' -- t, 1 J!. , l - 1 f-9 - - 91. TO LOMA DR-= .- DR � i y � '_ 1 y ' ' C Mr5 AVE =.. L i — JUSTIFICATION: These streets have been identified bythe City's Pavement Management Program Report as having a PCI range of 0 to 10. (Pavement Condition Index, a numerical index ranging from 0 for failed pavement to 100 indicating pavement in perfect condition.) F _ F F EF I 1 '- I — - - I r ' 2N0 -- ST ' \ AYE \ ! 'ST ". - Alf '\ 1 A - CT 15T ST TO IST STATUS: Design and Construction to begin FY 05-06. 11 TO PROSPECT -75T. PL AND 1ST BARNEY CT TO PROSPECT 00,11'• IST STIBARNEY PCH TO BARNEY CT MEYER CT COST ESTIMATE 1 CURRENT REQUEST Project Management Engineering Construction Services Construction Contingencies Total 35,000 100,000 123,901 1,239,015 123,902 1,621,818 FUND SOURCE 05-06 301 Capital Improvement 302 Artesia Relinquishment Fund 1,385,907 Fund 235,911 1,621,818 Total 1,621,818 232 t i f 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 r l i t r t t 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: STREET IMPROVEMENTS 301-8121-4201 PROJECT NO. TITLE: CIP 05-121 Aviation Boulevard Street Tree Project �,,, ^ "" .g. — g t AIL a PROJECT DESCRIPTION: • Replace existing street trees on Aviation Boulevard between Harper Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway with 69 Queen Palm trees and repair irrigation. • Provide newatewa signage and 9 Y 9 na 9 landscaping near Harper Avenue. CORONA n Milk NIIlk ROJECT \ LOCA TIO oviosso s. '� JUSTIFICATION: Existing trees are in poor health due to damaged irrigation system. o r g BONNIE BRAE ST. all CEAFT 6� y OR. L 11:1 s STATUS: PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 5I ISI r_ t I ISI COST ESTIMATE I CURRENT REQUEST Construction 126,235 Contingencies (20%) 25,247 ; FUND SOURCE 05-06 301 Capital Improvement Fund 151,482 Total 151,482 233 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Sewer Improvements 160-8413-4201 301-8413-4201 PROJECT NO./TITLE: CIP 05-413 Sewer Improvements — Target Areas 2-4 N/A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Sanitary sewer reconstruction/rehabilitation that also require street improvements: • Loma Dr. from 19th St. north to the end of the line at MH132 • Palm Dr. from 16th St. to 19th St. • Porter Lane from Ardmore Ave. to east of MH No. 732 • 21St Street from Ardmore to PCH Sanitary sewers that require lining and spot repairs: • Easement between properties from 25th St. to 24th St., MH509 to MH508 • Circle Dr. from Manhattan Ave. to Manhattan Ave. • 21St St. from Manhattan Ave. to Palm Dr. • Valley Dr. at 8th St. — MH 701 to MH 610 • 11th Street from PCH to Ardmore • Ardmore from 10th Street to 11th Street • Hopkins from 5th Street to 3`d Street • Ardmore from 6th Street to 8th Street • 8th Street from Ardmore Avenue to Valley Drive • 1st Street from Strand to Beach Drive • Easement area south of Longfellow from MH No. 81 east to MH No. 80 north to MH No. 79 on Longfellow JUSTIFICATION: Several segments of the sanitary sewer in areas (2-4) are over capacity and are causing maintenance problems as a result of the low velocities. Potential for backup. STATUS: Preliminary engineering, including an engineering report, was completed in FY 2001-02. Design and construction is scheduled this fiscal year (2005- 2006). Trenchless technology for sewer rehabilitation will be utilized whenever possible. COST ESTIMATE CURRENT REQUEST Project Management Engineering Const. Services Construction Contingencies 40,000 60,000 60,000 600,000 114,000 I FUND SOURCE 05-06 160 Sewer 301 Capital Fund 436,000 Improvement Fund 438,000 Total 874,000 Total 874,000 234 r 1 I r r 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Park Improvements 125-8535-4201 126-8535-4201 127-8535-4201 301-8535-4201 PROJECT NO.ITITLE: CIP 04-535 Clark Field Improvements I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Install new field lighting 2. New irrigation 3. Sewer and water system improvements LI I LJ 1 ill__ N k € �. NOV COW MOM F I 2 JUSTIFICATION: 1. Existing lighting is very old and not energy efficient. 2. New irrigation system is required due to the existing system being inadequate to maintain the field sufficiently irrigated. Existing sewer and water lines are in need of repair and or replacement. —Mint —71/E. i,. r•�► i >" _ g S CLARK FIELD3. 1 E. �� 1 NM-..-", STATUS: Construction in FY 05-06. ..� IMIK I`I 1 I°tl OW W, ORM r II /l 12 M _4,,w. we k� I.N. OAK 1 §C ]I 1 C -it . .�FRHH]R'[I•s COST ESTIMATE 1 CURRENT REQUEST Construction: Lighting 180,000 Irrigation 50,000 Sewer/Water replacement 25,000 Contingencies 20,000 FUND SOURCE 05-06 125 Parks & Recreation Fund 106,754 126 4% UUT Fund 29,889 127 Building Improvement Fund 4,904 301 Capital Improvement Fund 133,453 Total 275,000 Total 275,000 235 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT CATEGORY: FIRE PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: Public Buildings and Grounds 180-8610-4201 PROJECT NO./TITLE: CIP 99-610 Fire Station Renovation N /A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The EOC remodel for 2005-06 includes the following items: • Construction and material costs to repair floor & kitchen area - $15,000 •Refurbish windows - $2,500 • Replace window coverings - $2,200 • Replace worn carpet - $3,500 • Ceiling fans - $2,200 JUSTIFICATION: The City is currently preparing its Disaster Mitigation Plan and updating the Emergency Operations Plan. Upgrades to the Emergency Operations Center are necessary to accommodate disaster preparedness. The Emergency Operations Center is in need of refurbishing, including windows, window coverings, carpet, and ceiling fans. STATUS: COST ESTIMATE I CURRENT REQUEST Construction 25,400 FUND SOURCE 05-06 180 Fire Protection Fund 25,400 Total 25,400 236 1 i t 1 1 1 t 1 r 1 1 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Public Buildings and Grounds Improvements 715-8612-4201 PROJECT NOJTITLE: CIP 02-612 Public Works Yard Renovation — Phase 2 J I I I I I 111 \ I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Phase 2 entails construction of a new metal building (72' L x 50' D x 16' H) abutting the existing structure extending westerly. This building will be for the mechanics shop, paint shop, and sign shop. Phase 2 also includes construction of office space, mezzanine storage, restrooms, and installation of two hydraulic vehicle lifts. PACIFlC COAST HIGHWAY s n :1I 6 X JUSTIFICATION: The current levels of operation and efficiency are constrained by the old facilities and the site layout. Consequently, it is difficult to conduct maintenance operations in a cost- effective manner. • "' .. s PRO,ICT OCA T O STATUS: The oil well abandonment and site restoration was completed in FY 04-05. In FY 05-06 construction of Phase 2 will be completed. Phase 2 completion will allow for demolition of old, deteriorated buildings and site improvements to develop a master plan for the City Yard. This work will be performed in FY 06-07 and FY 07-08. AVE = r.- DRNE SUNSET DRIVE ,yo;c„ I I r MONTEREY BLVD. uoHTEREr BAYVIEW DRNE1 DAY NEW Id of MANHATTAN AVE MANHATTAN PAW DRIVE I f I A. I II I g, n F f, R HERMOSA AVE n o m I ,3 _pi ^ r- r --- COST COST ESTIMATE I CURRENT REQUEST Architectural/Engineering 15,000 Construction Services 5,000 Construction 201,000 Contingencies 20,000 FUND SOURCE 05-06 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 241,000 Total 241,000 237 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Public Buildings and Grounds Improvements 140-8626-4201 PROJECT NO.!TITLE: CIP 02-626 Community Center Theater ADA Upgrades N /A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will provide architectural upgrades to the Community Center Complex as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act. The scope of work will include but not be limited to the following: Paths -of -Travel: General accessibility to facility, i.e., ramps, rails and thresholds Accessibility: Access to particular spaces and/or areas, i.e., administration offices, restrooms, and gymnasium, etc. Finishes: Carpet, non-skid and tactile surfaces Signage: Accessibility signs and Braille surfaces JUSTIFICATION: The Americans with Disabilities Act requires that public buildings meet established requirements for handicapped access. This project will meet those goals. STATUS: Phases 1 and 2 (theater upgrade and exterior access) were completed in FY 03-04. Design of Phases 3, 4 and 5 were completed in FY 04-05. Construction of Phase 3 was partially completed and the remaining portion of Phase 3 will be completed in FY 05-06. COST ESTIMATE I CURRENT REQUEST Architectural 5,000 Construction 530,000 Construction Service 40,000 Project Management 20,000 FUND SOURCE 05-06 140 CDBG 218,066 Total 595,000 238 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Public Buildings and Grounds 121-8630-4201 PROJECT NOJTITLE: CIP 00-630 Municipal Pier Renovation - Phase III - Architectural Upgrades 1 11 11 1 L Li L PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Municipal Pier Architectural Upgrades will provide major aesthetic and practical improvements to the pier, pier plaza and lifeguard facilities. New restrooms, pavement, lighting, utilities room, handrails, 911 room, and lifeguard budding are to be provided by this project. ,, , .4-1 -I 1: II INS - " WO n CJUSTIFICATION: project is Phase III of a three-phase project calling for the renovation of the pier. Phase III will include the plaza, lifeguard facilities and restroom improvements. Phase I, which called for the repair of the pier structure, was completed in May 1999. Phase II, which consists of deck surface repair work, work related to the installation of a new lighting system and safety railing along the pier, was completed in November 2000. aThis j- ( 9.�r ( ISI 1 "° .� AVE. DR. \ \ Iu E IWIHAISVI NE ( \ I E \E —r',--K— g HERMOSA 3G i »E k-- gd i --6 6 s r —K— g: g 6 g: g —6 € g c STATUS: Completion of the project is anticipated by August 2005. r PROJECT OCA TION PACIFIC OCEAN COST ESTIMATE CURRENT REQUEST Project Management 400,000 Architectural 600,000 Construction Services 40,000 Construction 3,500,000 Contingencies 681,000 FUND SOURCE 05-06 121 Prop A Fund 577,733 Total 5,221,000 239 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Public Buildings and Ground Improvements 122-8631-4201 PROJECT NO./TITLE: CIP 99-631 Beach Restrooms Rehabilitation )V ` 00�improvements O ' % PROJEC ` - ` `� LOCA TION '��040),t % `'��� %Q �. ? . . ` • \ * o O Q®O, 00 A% PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of interior and exterior to the restrooms located at: • 2`d Street and The Strand • 14th Street and The Strand • 22nd Street and The Strand JUSTIFICATION: These restrooms are over 30 years old and in great need of repair. Restrooms became the City's responsibility as part of the contract with L.A. County Lifeguards. STATUS: Design in FY 2005-06 COST ESTIMATE ICURRENT REQUEST Project Management Engineering and Architectural Construction Services Construction Contingencies 21,000 33,000 36,000 300,000 60,000 FUND SOURCE 05-06 122 Tyco Fund 38,826 Total 450,000 240 r 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 t i f 1 1 t CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Public Buildings and Grounds Improvements 301-8633-4201 PROJECT NOJTITLE: CIP 05-633 Re -Roofing of City Buildings N /A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Re -roofing of City buildings: • Community Center $46,000 • City Yard Metal Building, $35,000 Project includes total removal and replacement of roof material. JUSTIFICATION: The roofs have exceeded design life and need replacement. The last several years of patchwork have extended the lives of the roofs but the leaks continue to appear and damage the building interiors. Most of the roofs listed are 25 years old. STATUS: Re -roofing of the Community Services Building, Fire Department. and South Schools Building was completed in FY 04-05. The Community Center and the City Yard metal building re -roofing will be completed in FY 05-06. COST ESTIMATE I CURRENT REQUEST Construction Contingencies 81,000 9,000 FUND SOURCE 05-06 301 Capital Improvement Fund 90,000 Total 90,000 241 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Public Buildings and Grounds Improvements 301-8634-4201 PROJECT NO./TITLE: CIP 05-634 Exterior Painting of the Clark Building, Community Services Building, Bowling Green Building N /A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of repairing, patching, waterproofing, and painting the exterior of the Clark Building, the Lawn Bowling Facilities, and the two storage building/facilities at Bicentennial Park and at 61" St./Prospect Ave. JUSTIFICATION: These buildings have not been painted in over 10 years; the paint is cracked, peeling, and faded. All buildings are in poor condition and are not a positive reflection of the City. STATUS: Exterior painting of the Community Services Building was completed in FY 04-05. Clark Building - Painting of this building will be completed in FY 05-06. COST ESTIMATE 1 CURRENT REQUEST Construction Contingencies 23,700 2,300 FUND SOURCE 05-06 301 Capital Improvement Fund 26,000 Total 26,000 242 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix MO UM MAI MNI 11111 OW UMI MN NMI OM all co N OD alli 111111 1110 IIIIII MS MO MI NI MO IMO INS UM SIB ill This page intentionally left blank 244 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FACTS & FIGURES • Date of Incorporation January 14, 1907 • Form of Government Council - City Manager • Location Four miles south of Los Angeles International Airport • Area 1.3 square miles • Population 19,549 • Parking Meters 1,714 • Public Safety One Police Station, 39 safety personnel One Fire Station, 20 safety personnel • Parks & Public Facilities Beach - 36.52 acres Twenty parks - 21.70 acres Hermosa Greenbelt — 19.50 acres (Open space park) One Community Theatre • Libraries One Los Angeles County Branch Library • Employees Full-time 139 • Climate Average Temperature 70° F Summer, 55° F Winter • Assessed Valuation $2.80 Billion Source: City of Hermosa Beach, Finance Department HdL Coren & Cone 2003-04 2 State of California Department of Finance 245 Lasnipet0T \Intam071.1 ce® tw.-ti.y .,e: Santa Monica Bay Pacitk Ocean .00.3 Kmsolt G? 412007 IR`TM.wroprom.ni. l M�raWt` MapP°int wutnry ewd -1 + Westmont. Marine Ave;. Manhattan e1 I Beach 1190254 -741— HaxmssaA ,_-�!4.. tifk 107- Redondo Be e - .gwrrce-Blvd--...— } TOrranlFe R 1 Yj '_'...`. Pats Verdes/- __ II .. EslRes z+mdo"w•ra}mit+ +0�e. Bird ... -Bantlq <' .. , . Verdes E*teteenins . • Miles of streets Forty miles of streets • Number of Street Lights 588 (city owned) 818 (electric utility) • Sanitary Sewers 34 miles • City Storm Drains 1 mile • Parcels' 6,909 Residential — 6,271 Commercial — 367 Vacant — 120 Other —151 • Housing Units2 9,916 • Persons Per Household2 2.0362 REVENUE HISTORY BY FUND 2002-03 Actual 2001-02 Actual 2000-01 Actual 1999-00 1998-99 Actual Actual General Fund Revenue from Property Taxes Revenue from Sales & Use Tax Revenue from Transient Occupancy Tax Revenue from Business License Tax Revenue from Utility Users Tax Revenue from Other Taxes Revenue from Licenses & Permits Revenue from Fines & Forfeitures Revenue from Use of Property & Money Revenue from Other Governments Revenue from Service Charges Other Revenues $5,282,147 $4,861,793 $4,450,847 $4,074,852 $3,614,162 2,658,800 2,658,955 2,698,726 2,381,067 2,127,364 1,054,272 918,165 793,818 711,929 549,858 689,270 661,790 627,987 568,501 592,228 2,137,975 2,092,916 1,896,613 1,720,936 1,840,513 679,451 811,290 776,605 766,046 731,652 571,682 445,673 579,608 558,456 567,607 276,786 210,554 177,977 195,481 204,884 365,940 432,423 695,192 554,760 536,617 1,195,416 1,162,706 1,179,120 1,056,398 953,644 1,165,490 1,032,763 1,070,067 1,015,653 1,076,447 2,017,661 476,392 377,173 1,164,390 116,240 Total General Fund Lighting & Landscaping Fund Downtown Enhancement Fund Parking Fund State Gas Tax Fund AB 939 Fund County Gas Tax Fund Prop A Open Space Fund Tyco Fund Parks/Rec Facility Tax Fund UUT Railroad Right of Way Fund Building Improvement Fund Lower Pier District Administrative Expense Fund Myrtle District Administrative Expense Fund Loma District Administrative Expense Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Prop A Transit Fund Prop C Fund Grant Fund Office of Traffic Safety Grant Fund Air Quality Improvement Fund Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund Califomia Law Enforcement Equipment Program Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prevention Fund Sewer Fund Asset Forfeiture Fund Fire Protection Fund Contingency Fund Capital Improvement Fund Artesia Boulevard Relinquishment Fund Lower Pier Avenue Improvement Fund Myrtle Utility Underground Improvement Fund Loma Utility Underground Improvement Fund Lower Pier District Redemption Fund Myrtle Avenue Assessment Fund Loma Drive Assessment Fund Insurance Fund Equipment Replacement Fund $18,094,890 $460,638 844,132 2,514,622 406,089 74,826 30 19,977 1,941,281 103,397 64,880 363 2,775 8,875 9,874 36,695 310,071 230,306 376,488 57,310 23,189 103,732 20,151 38,026 849,784 6,919 101,107 670,093 1,141,306 15,590 2,091 1,711 2,946 590 1,954 2,036 1,885,782 1,130,629 $15,765,420 $469,996 778,687 2,304,534 406,829 74,719 30,001 18,199 0 126,834 16,291 3,861 2,738 8,885 10,586 450,467 285,138 233,702 644,308 0 23,020 106,334 41,657 0 204,579 23,152 91,477 42,171 120,925 507,470 3,279 902 6,467 720 2,596 2,733 1,281,105 998,488 $15,323,733 $14,768,469 $12,911,216 $479,096 663,937 1,840,802 516,650 86,771 1,455 812,011 0 322,346 30,449 13,307 2,631 8,967 11,686 56,661 299,530 286,548 158,796 0 22,915 108,108 114,147 0 358,022 20,124 205,092 0 153,438 0 5,381 12,433 22,907 1,451 5,604 4,754 1,177,805 835,935 $489,856 512,563 1,794,111 380,112 77,204 1,115 1,461,451 0 231,341 25,806 9,346 0 4,534 5,733 1,448 275,465 243,781 1,129,986 0 31,923 45,016 0 0 233,989 18,499 159,734 0 51,937 0 3,738 1,567,601 1,733,825 781 4,670 3,628 1,069,083 697,853 $497,344 364,467 1,973,658 355,468 76,138 5,999 4,507,569 0 202,108 79,651 10,892 0 0 0 3,063 270,853 220,897 242,866 0 21,448 45,158 0 0 207,894 15,643 177,959 0 8,544 0 5,994 0 0 899 0 0 996,237 496,214 Grand Total $31,555,155 $25,088,270 $23,963,492 $27,034,598 $23,698,179 246 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 REVENUE CATEGORY DETAIL 2005-06 Schedule of Revenues by Fund and Revenue History by Fund The following General Fund revenue accounts are included for each revenue category on the Schedule of Revenues by Fund and the Revenue History by Fund: Property Taxes Current Year Secured Current Year Unsecured Prior Year Collections Supplemental Roll SB813 Sales and Use Tax Sales Tax In -Lieu Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Business License Tax Utility Users Tax Property Tax In -Lieu of Vehicle License Fees Other Taxes 1/2 Cent Sales Tax Extension Transfer Tax Cable TV Franchise Electric Franchise Gas Franchise Refuse Franchise Licenses and Permits Fines and Forfeitures Use of Money and Property Other Governments I ntergovernmentaVState Service Charges Other Revenues 247 EXPENDITURE HISTORY BY FUND 2002-03 2001-02 2000-01 1999-00 1998-99 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual General Fund City Council City Attorney City Clerk/Elections City Manager Prospective Expenditures City Prosecutor City Treasurer Community Development Building & Safety Planning Community Resources/Cable TV Information Systems * Finance Administration Fire Department General Appropriations Personnel Police Crossing Guards Public Works Administration/Parks Building Maintenance Street Maintenance/Traffic Safety Capital Improvement Projects Total General Fund Lighting & Landscaping Fund Downtown Enhancement Fund Parking Fund State Gas Tax Fund AB 939 Fund County Gas Tax Fund Compensated Absences Fund Prop A Open Space Fund Tyco Fund Parks/Rec Facility Tax Fund UUT Railroad Right of Way Fund Building Improvement Fund Lower Pier Administrative Expense Fund Myrtle District Administrative Expense Fund Loma District Administrative Expense Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Prop A Transit Fund Prop C Fund Grant Fund Office of Traffic Safety Grant Fund Air Quality Improvement Fund Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund California Law Enforcement Equipment Program Taskforce for Reg Autotheft Prevention Fund Sewer Fund Asset Forfeiture Fund Fire Protection Fund Capital Improvement Fund Artesia Boulevard Relinquishment Fund Lower Pier Avenue Improvement Fund Myrtle Utility Underground Improvement Fund Bayview Dr Utility Undergrounding District Bonnie Brae Underground District Beach Dr Utility Undergrounding District Loma Utility Underground Improvement Fund Insurance Fund Equipment Replacement Fund $172,690 $172,379 $204,214 $194,952 $217,899 279,261 243,449 225,789 131,600 234,779 182,201 184,647 138,015 162,536 132,942 258,608 284,607 236,816 232,039 195,500 0 0 0 0 0 113,715 150,377 95,302 89,466 82,601 84,290 67,263 62,551 59,565 55,842 524,765 493,396 483,765 471,863 454,866 414,414 386,990 370,985 321,502 289,560 974,848 888,734 725,387 744,245 662,438 0 0 0 0 145,599 637,934 492,617 460,595 459,771 421,117 3,191,429 2,950,206 2,750,457 2,420,774 2,471,558 46,487 36,080 49,317 24,449 41,727 253,164 236,381 221,590 178,478 140,442 6,699,025 5,944,320 6,147,152 5,290,153 4,998,907 54,247 59,704 54,660 51,552 51,643 841,315 806,328 679,287 622,244 589,211 424,487 362,019 346,796 396,783 365,095 711,198 740,303 588,132 535,465 498,891 156,033 178,391 437,038 107,906 3,500 $16,020,111 $14,678,191 $14,277,848 $12,495,343 $12,054,116 567,716 527,619 598,028 701,811 444,776 939,016 933,797 724,740 715,214 166,464 2,512,482 1,577,319 1,301,344 1,136,550 1,072,985 490,989 143,322 80,095 16,910 52 35,135 32,210 33,528 35,224 29,977 0 47,078 0 70,582 1,790 44,263 0 0 0 0 155,356 0 872,057 1,334,611 4,507,608 33,101 0 0 0 0 518,588 328,589 255,204 59,776 61,717 365,194 18,767 70,672 226,130 1,046,890 0 153,686 15,025 745 18,445 2,753 1,688 1,618 0 0 8,587 5,472 5,718 26 0 9,231 5,898 8,003 26 0 36,695 450,399 56,661 1,448 3,062 302,906 263,641 231,754 318,169 298,842 103,090 443,345 372,174 46,528 18,155 368,366 643,761 147,725 1,140,708 242,866 57,310 0 69,219 825 720 445 80,402 116,464 34,812 51,904 42,123 90,092 0 0 38,026 0 0 0 2,196,368 631,420 780,551 519,843 0 0 0 34,936 88,451 53,068 0 24,933 788,723 1,324,089 104,562 193,584 0 12,180 0 0 0 0 0 25,522 0 4,995 504,986 1,042,506 30,000 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 23,724 0 0 0 0 69,604 0 1,112,538 0 1,799,829 1,168,500 2,432,447 1,202,263 1,287,881 816,529 791,580 1,021 30,192 0 0 688,835 24,233 21,309 193,098 0 112,504 15,233 0 0 0 15,233 536,184 454,956 Grand Total $27,180,188 $25,645,229 $22,462,854 $24,530,039 $22,060,543 *Information Systems was moved to the Equipment Replacement Fund in Fiscal year 1999-00. 248 e r t 1 t 1 1 EXPLANATION OF USER CHARGE ALLOCATIONS Computer Replacement Charges: Departments are charged user charges for the replacement of computer equipment, peripheral equipment, and business machines. The current useful life for personal computers is 3 years, while peripherals range from 4 to 6 years. The useful life for business machines is 7 years. The allocation is distributed based on the following weighted formula: Annual amortization + percent of Information Systems equipment amortization + percent of total Information Systems Division costs + business machine amortization. Equipment Replacement Charges: Departments are charged user charges for the replacement of vehicles, heavy equipment, and general small equipment. The useful life for vehicles and heavy equipment ranges from 3 to 25 years. The allocation is distributed based on the following weighted formula: Percent of Equipment Service Division costs + Department Parts & Fuel + Department vehicle amortization + Department specific services. Insurance User Charges: Departments are charged user charges for liability, worker's compensation, unemployment, and property and bonds. Costs are allocated using the following weighted formulas: Liability Percent of losses for 3 years x per cent of payroll + per cent of vehicles x Liability Department costs. Worker Compensation Percent of Payroll x Workers Compensation Department costs. An additional amount was added to department charges to fund future claims liabilities. The General Fund contribution was $50,000, with $7,537 contributed by other funds based on the relative share of overall costs. Auto/Property/Bonds Property — Premium based on percent of occupied square footage. Auto — Direct charge for vehicles Bonds — Number of employees as ratio of total employees + direct charge for department specific bonds. Unemployment Percent of Payroll x Unemployment Department costs. 249 This page intentionally left blank 250 i N Ws — INS a r .-111110— MS M MI r M— -- al i This page intentionally left blank 252 1 1 1 DEPT 4201 1 1 ii 4601 1 12201 1 1 1 2101 (a) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE VEHICLES SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT 2005-06 BUDGET 2005-06** REPLACEMENT FY*** AMOUNT ACCUM. TOTAL REPL 2005-06 THROUGH REPL IGROUPI ITEM COST IN SVC1 LIFE YR CHARGE 6/30/2006 COST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - BUILDING ✓ Ford Ranger Pickup $18,385 2001 10 2011 $1,838 $9,190 $18,385 ✓ Ford Ranger Pickup $18,385 2001 10 2011 $1,838 $9,190 $18,385 ✓ Ford F150 CNG Pickup $19,054 2003 10 2013 $1,905 $5,715 $19,054 ✓ Toyota Camry (CNG) $27,215 2000 10 2010 $2,722 $16,332 $27,215 COUNT: 4 SUBTOTAL: $83,040 $8,304 $40,427 $83,039 COMMUNITY RESOURCES ✓ Ford F350 Van $33,289 2001 10 2010 $3,329 $16,645 $33,289 ✓ Ford F150 4WD Pickup $24,434 2003 10 2013 $2,443 $7,329 $24,434 ✓ GEM Electric Vehicle (donated) $0 2003 NOT TO BE REPLACED COUNT: 3 SUBTOTAL: $57,724 $5,772 $23,974 $57,723 FIRE ✓ Pierce Fire Engine $265,893 1990 20 2010 $13,295 $212,720 $265,893 ✓ Smeal Fire Engine $353,419 1997 20 2017 $17,671 $159,039 $353,419 ✓ Pierce Fire Engine (delivery 6-00) $312,862 2000 20 2020 $15,643 $93,858 $312,862 ✓ Ford Crown Victoria (Code 3 Eq added $27,383 2001 10 2011 $2,738 $13,690 $27,383 ✓ Ford F350 Truck $33,379 1994 15 2009 $2,225 $20,025 $33,379 ✓ Ford Ambulance $64,663 1997 7 2004 $9,746 $64,663 $64,663 ✓ Ford Explorer (Code 3 Eq added) $32,770 2003 10 2013 $3,277 $9,831 $32,770 ✓ Ford Ambulance $64,663 1997 7 2004 $9,746 $64,663 $64,663 COUNT: 8 SUBTOTAL: $889,139 POLICE ✓ Ford Crown Victoria (HB5) ✓ Ford Crown Victoria (HB1) ✓ Ford Crown Victoria (HB2) $30,768 2003 4 2007 $30,768 2003 4 2007 $30,768 2003 4 2007 $74,341 $425,769 $889,139 $7,692 $7,692 $7,692 $14,864 $30,768 $14,864 $30,768 $14,864 $30,768 ✓ Ford Crown Victoria (HB8) $29,060 2002 4 2006 $7,265 $29,060 $29,060 ✓ Ford Crown Victoria (HB6) $29,060 2002 4 2006 $7,265 $29,060 $29,060 ✓ Ford Crown Victoria (HB10) $29,060 2002 4 2006 $7,265 $29,060 $29,060 ✓ Ford Crown Victoria (HB3) $29,060 2002 4 2006 $7,265 $29,060 $29,060 ✓ Ford Expedition - Patrol ✓ Dodge Durango 4 X 4 (Beach Patrol) ✓ Dodge Durango 4 X 4 $37,119 2005 4 2009 $9,280 $9,280 $32,601 2001 10 2011 $3,260 $16,300 $32,601 $28,519 2001 10 2011 NOT TO BE REPLACED $37,119 253 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE VEHICLES SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT 2005-06 BUDGET 2005-06** REPLACEMENT FY*** AMOUNT ACCUM. TOTAL REPL 2005-06 THROUGH REPL DEPT IGROUP' ITEM COST IN SVC1LIFE YR CHARGE 6/30/2006 COST 2101 POLICE (continued) (c) V BMW Motorcycle (includes set-up) (c) V BMW Motorcycle (includes set-up) ✓ Dodge Intrepid - Gray (Detectives) ✓ Chevrolet Impala - Tan (Detectives) ✓ Ford F150 Pickup (Detectives) ✓ Ford Crown Victoria (Silver) ✓ Kawasaki Motorcycle ✓ Kawasaki Motorcycle ✓ Chevy Silverado for LA Impact Officer ✓ Chevy Trailblazer ✓ Pontiac Grand Prix ✓ 2004 Ford Crown Victoria (Green) ✓ 2002 Ford Crown Victoria (Blue) $13,316 2004 3 2007 $4,439 $8,878 $13,316 $13,316 2004 3 2007 $4,439 $8,878 $13,316 $23,909 2000 7 2007 $3,416 $20,496 $23,909 $23,909 2000 7 2007 $3,416 $20,496 $23,909 $26,420 2001 7 2008 $3,774 $18,870 $26,420 $27,118 2001 7 2008 $3,874 $19,370 $27,118 $9,533 2002 5 2007 $1,907 $11,442 $9,533 $9,533 2002 5 2007 $1,907 $11,442 $9,533 $19,455 2005 7 2012 $2,779 $2,779 $18,797 $27,189 2005 7 2012 $3,884 $3,884 $27,189 $26,773 2005 7 2012 $3,825 $3,825 $26,773 $24,632 2005 7 2012 $3,519 $3,519 $24,632 $24,632 2005 7 2012 $3,519 $3,519 $24,632 COUNT: 23 SUBTOTAL: $576,520 $109,373 $323,810 $547,345 2104 OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT - SPEED ENFORCEMENT/EDUCATION PROGRAM ✓ Speed Check Trailer ✓ Speed Check Trailer 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES $13,640 1997 5 * NOT TO BE REPLACED $17,428 2003 5 * NOT TO BE REPLACED COUNT: 2 SUBTOTAL: $31,068 ✓ Ford Ranger 4 X 4 Pickup ANIMAL TRANSPORT UNIT/AC TRUCK * $20,736 1999 10 2009 $2,074 $14,518 $20,736 $7,606 1997 10 2007 $761 $6,849 $7,606 V Ford Ranger Pickup $15,751 1996 10 2006 $1,575 $14,175 $15,751 ✓ GO -4 (CNG) ✓ GO -4 (CNG) ✓ GO -4 (Gas) ✓ GO -4 (Gas) ✓ GO -4 (Propane) ✓ GO -4 (Propane) ✓ Ford Ranger 4X4 Pickup ✓ GO -4 (Propane) $30,075 2004 10 2014 $3,008 $6,016 $30,075 $30,075 2004 10 2014 $3,008 $6,016 $30,075 $22,906 2001 10 2011 $2,291 $11,455 $22,906 $22,906 2001 10 2011 $2,291 $11,455 $22,906 $25,646 1998 10 2008 $2,565 $20,520 $25,646 $25,646 1998 10 2008 $2,565 $20,520 $25,646 $22,149 1997 10 2007 $2,215 $19,935 $22,149 $25,646 1997 10 2007 $2,565 $23,085 $25,646 COUNT: 11 SUBTOTAL: $249,142 $24,915 $154,544 $249,142 254 1 1 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE VEHICLES SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT 2005-06 BUDGET 2005-06** REPLACEMENT FY*** AMOUNT ACCUM. TOTAL REPL 2005-06 THROUGH REPL DEPT (GROUP' ITEM COST IN SVC( LIFE YR CHARGE 6/30/2006 COST PUBLIC WORKS FLEET 4202 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION (b) 1 V Ford Ranger Pickup (60%) $21,000 1996 10 2006 $1,260 $21,000 $21,000 ✓ Toyota Camry (CNG) ✓ Chevrolet Astrovan $27,215 2000 10 2010 $2,722 $16,332 $27,215 $26,250 1989 10 2005 $2,625 $26,250 $26,250 COUNT: 2.6 SUBTOTAL: $74,465 $6,607 $63,582 $74,465 I4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE ✓ Ford F250 Truck (CNG) $34,776 2000 15 2015 $2,318 $13,910 $34,776 I(b) V (40%) Ford F350 Utility Truck in Sewers 1996 20 2016 $660 COUNT: 1.4 SUBTOTAL: $34,776 $2,979 $13,910 $34,776 13301 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT (b) V (5%) Ford F150 Pickup in Parks 1997 15 2012 $109 III(b) V (5%) Ford F250 Utility Truck in Traffic Sfty 2001 10 2011 $146 COUNT: 0.1 SUBTOTAL: $254 1 6101 PARKS (b) V Ford F150 Pickup King Cab 4 X 4 (55% $31,516 1997 15 2012 $1,157 $18,736 $31,516 ✓ Ford F350 DumpTruck $33,689 1995 20 2015 $1,684 $18,524 $33,689 II (b) V Dodge Durango (50%) $32,537 2005 10 2008 $1,627 $26,030 $32,537 (1998 transferred from PD 04-05) (b) V Ford F250 Utility Truck (70%) $31,608 2001 15 2011 $1,475 $21,072 $31,608 1 1 3102 SEWERS ✓ Ford F450 Dump Truck I(b) V Ford F350 Utility Truck (60%) (b) V (20%) Ford F150 Pickup in Parks (b) (b) COUNT: 2.75 SUBTOTAL: $129,350 V (40%) Ford Ranger Pickup in PW Admin 1 1 1 ✓ Dodge Durango (30%) (1998 transferred from PD 04-05) H Eq Caterpillar (Front Loader) $33,780 2001 20 2021 $31,891 1996 20 2016 1997 15 2012 $5,942 $84,362 $129,350 $1,689 $8,445 $33,780 $958 $15,945 $31,891 $420 1996 10 2006 $840 2005 10 2008 $173,525 2005 10 2015 $1,010 $17,353 $17,353 $173,525 H Eq Backhoe (50%) $44,101 1986 20 2006 $2,205 $41,895 $44,101 COUNT: 4.0 SUBTOTAL: $283,298 255 $24,474 $83,638 $283,298 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE VEHICLES SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT 2005-06 BUDGET 2005-06** REPLACEMENT FY*** AMOUNT ACCUM. TOTAL REPL 2005-06 THROUGH REPL DEPT 'GROUPS ITEM COST IN SVCI LIFE YR CHARGE 6/30/2006 COST 2601 STREET LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS V (b) V (b) V (b) V V V H Eq Ford F250 Utility Truck (20%) Ford F150 Pickup in Parks (30%) Ford F250 Utility Truck in Parks Dodge Durango (20%) (1998 transferred from PD 04-05) Ford F150 Pickup Truck Chevrolet 6500 Hi Lift Truck Hyster Forklift $34,413 2001 15 2016 $2,294 $11,470 $34,413 1997 15 2012 $435 2001 15 2011 $654 2005 10 2008 $674 $23,909 1996 15 2011 $132,072 2003 20 2023 $19,562 1995 20 2015 $1,594 $15,940 $23,909 $6,604 $19,812 $132,072 $978 $10,758 $19,562 H Eq Backhoe (50%) $44,101 1986 20 2006 $2,205 $41,895 $44,101 COUNT: 5.20 SUBTOTAL: $254,056 $15,438 $99,875 $254,056 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY ✓ Ford F250 SD Stake Bed Truck $27,996 2002 10 2012 $2,800 $11,200 $27,996 (b) V Ford F250 Utility Truck (95%) $28,236 2001 10 2011 $2,682 $14,118 $28,236 ✓ Ford F450 Dump Truck $31,539 2001 25 2026 $1,262 $6,310 $31,539 ✓ Ford F450 Custom Paint Truck $73,416 2002 10 2012 $7,342 $29,368 $73,416 Heq Generator $14,532 2004 10 2014 $1,453 $2,906 $14,532 COUNT: 4.95 SUBTOTAL: $175,717 $15,538 $63,902 $175,718 GRAND TOTALS COUNT: 72.00 TOTAL: $2,807,228 $293,937 $1,377,793 $2,778,052 GROUP LEGEND V = Vehicle H Eq = Heavy Equipment NOTE: EQUIPMENT SERVICE VAN IS INCLUDED IN PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION BECAUSE AMOUNT IS TOO SMALL TO ALLOCATE TO ALL DEPARTMENTS. FUNDED BY OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT. NOT INCLUDED IN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES. THERE WAS A 3.5% INCREASE TO THE NEW VEHICLE CPI FROM JAN 2004 TO FEB 2005; THEREFORE VEHICLE REPLACEMENT VALUES WERE INCREASED BY THAT AMOUNT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-05. REFLECTS INCREASE OF 1.50% TO REFLECT INTEREST THAT WOULD BE EARNED IF INTEREST WAS ALLOCATED TO THIS FUND. ALL POLICE VEHICLES INCLUDE "SET UP" IN REPLACEMENT COSTS. Effective 7/1/04 Public Works vehicles are being allocated to all departments based on personnel allocation of primary user. Reflects original cost ($23,282) less buyback from BMW ($10,416) + CPI increase for current year INDICATES VEHICLE SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT IN 2004-05 VEHICLES LISTED IN BOLD SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT BUT NOT YET PURCHASED OR DISPOSED OF. REPLACEMENT VALUES FOR THESE VEHICLES WERE NOT ADJUSTED. 256 EN* g '4 F 14 1-4 a114 vwLo sex oar w� OM NO - 11111 OM r MN ON I I ON-- I- - ON N- This page intentionally left blank 258 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE COMPUTERS SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT 2005-06 BUDGET AMOUNT FY ACCUM. TOTAL REPL 2005/06 THROUGH REPL DEPT I GROUP ITEM IQTYI COST IINSVCILIFE YR CHARGE 06/30/06 COST 1121 CITY CLERK PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer Printer HP LaserJet 4050 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 1 $1,400 2000 6 2006 $233 $1,400 $1,400 Printer HP LaserJet 2200 Scanner HP 6270A Scanner 1141 CITY TREASURER 1 $1,662 2003 6 2009 $277 $831 $1,662 1 $1,000 2000 4 2004 $250 $1,000 $1,000 COUNT 5 $6,662 $1,626 $5,831 $6,662 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 1201 CITY MANAGER ** COUNT 2 $2,600 $866 $2,600 $2,600 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 Printer Printer HP LaserJet 2200 HP 656 C Deskjet *1206 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1 $1,662 2003 6 2009 $277 $831 $1,662 1 $510 2003 6 2009 $85 $255 $510 COUNT 4 $4,772 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer Laptop Dell Printer HP LaserJet 4 Plus Novell Network Quantum tape drive Network Battery backup Network Poweredge File Server - Comm Resources E -Commerce Network Poweredge File Server - Eden Inforum Gold Network Poweredge File Server - Active Directory Network 400 Mhz Computer System w/PC Anywhere $1,228 $3,686 $4,772 $1,078 2005 3 2008 $359 $359 $1,078 $1,078 2005 3 2008 $359 $359 $1,078 $2,714 2005 3 2008 $905 $905 $2,714 $1,300 1999 4 2003 $325 $325 $1,300 $4,329 2004 6 2010 $722 $1,444 $4,329 $500 2000 4 2004 $125 $500 $500 $5,971 2002 6 2008 $995 $3,980 $5,551 $5,810 2002 6 2008 $968 $3,872 $5,390 $5,810 2002 6 2008 $968 $3,872 $5,390 $1,300 NOT TO BE REPLACED Network Dell Pentium 4 Computer (Handhelds download) 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 Network Epson 570 Printer Printer HP Photosmart 1215 Printer Network Poweredge File Server - T2 Laptop Dell Laptop Computer Laptop Dell Laptop Computer (used by Chad) Laptop Pentium 650 Mhz Gateway Computer Laptop Pentium 650 Mhz Gateway Computer Laptop Pentium 650 Mhz Gateway Computer Network Poweredge File Server - SunPro Network Poweredge File Server - Class Network Poweredge File Server - Norton AntiVirus Network Poweredge File Server - AntiVirus Network Poweredge File Server - Exchange Network 266 Mhz Computer Sys/EDEN backup (Joe) $800 $464 $6,499 $2,515 $2,515 $2,604 $2,604 $2,604 $5,236 $5,236 $1,943 $2,341 $5,810 $1,300 NOT TO BE REPLACED 2002 6 2008 $77 $308 $464 2004 6 2008 $1,083 $2,166 $6,079 NOT TO BE REPLACED NOT TO BE REPLACED NOT TO BE REPLACED NOT TO BE REPLACED NOT TO BE REPLACED 2002 2002 2002 2005 2002 2001 6 2008 $873 6 2008 $873 6 2008 $324 6 2011 $390 6 2008 $968 3 2004 $484 $3,492 $3,492 $1,296 $390 $3,872 $1,300 $4,816 $4,816 $1,523 $2,341 $5,390 $1,300 Network Dell Optiplex GX260T 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 259 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE COMPUTERS SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT 2005-06 BUDGET AMOUNT FY ACCUM. TOTAL REPL 2005/06 THROUGH REPL DEPT I GROUP ITEM IQTYI COST IN SVCILIFE YR CHARGE 06/30/06 COST 1206 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (continued) Laptop Laptop Laptop Network Printer Printer Printer Pentium 100 Mhz Patriot Computer Pentium 100 Mhz Patriot Computer Pentium 100 Mhz Patriot Computer Fileserver cabinet HP LaserJet 2200 Printer HP LaserJet 2200 PURCHASED BUT NOT INSTALLED HP 870 CXI DeskJet Printer $4,000 NOT TO BE REPLACED $4,000 NOT TO BE REPLACED $4,000 NOT TO BE REPLACED $2,135 2002 5 2007 $427 $1,662 2003 6 2009 $277 $1,662 2003 6 2009 $277 $300 NOT TO BE REPLACED $1,708 $831 $831 $2,135 $1,662 $1,662 ACC Bar Code Reader 1 $300 1999 7 2006 $43 $300 $300 COUNT 31 $93,020 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION $12,688 $38,202 $62,418 PC PC PC PC PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer System Dell Pentium 4 Computer System Dell Pentium 4 Computer System Dell Pentium 4 Computer System Dell Pentium 4 Computer System $1,300 2003 $1,300 2003 $1,300 2003 $1,300 2003 $1,300 2003 3 3 3 3 3 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 $433 $433 $433 $433 $433 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 • PC 333 Mhz Computer System(Call Accounting) -- Printer HP LaserJet 2 (call accounting) 1 1 1 $1,300 2000 6 2006 $217 $1,300 $1,300 1 $1,300 2000 6 2006 $217 $1,300 $1,300 1 $1,300 2000 3 2003 $800 1998 4 2002 $433 $200 $1,300 $800 $1,300 $800 Printer HP LaserJet 5N Printer HP LaserJet 4 Printer HP LaserJet 4100 $2,516 2003 6 2009 $419 $1,258 $2,516 Printer HP LaserJet 5N Printer HP LaserJet 4 1 $1,300 2000 6 2006 $217 $1,300 $1,300 1 $1,300 2000 6 2006 $217 $1,300 $1,300 1203 PERSONNEL PC Dell Laptop Computer COUNT 12 $16,316 1 $2,584 2002 3 2005 $4,085 $861 $15,058 $16,316 $2,584 $2,584 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer Dell Pentium 4 Computer Tower (training) 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 Shamrock Monitor 1 1 $1,300 2000 6 2006 $217 $1,300 $1,300 1 $350 NOT TO BE REPLACED Printer HP LaserJet 4 Plus Printer HP LaserJet 2200 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS $1,662 2003 6 2009 COUNT 6 $8,496 $277 $2,221 $831 $1,662 $7,315 $8,146 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 Printer HP 1215 Photosmart Scanner HP Scanjet 5490 CXI 2101 POLICE DEPARTMENT PC PC PC PC Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers COUNT 260 1 $464 2003 6 2009 $77 $231 $500 2003 4 2007 $125 $375 3 $2,264 $635 $1,906 $1,325 2004 3 2007 $442 $884 $1,325 2004 3 2007 $442 $884 $1,325 2004 3 2007 $442 $884 $1,325 2004 3 2007 $442 $884 $464 $500 $2,264 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 1 1 i EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE COMPUTERS SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT 2005-06 BUDGET AMOUNT FY ACCUM. TOTAL REPL 2005/06 THROUGH REPL DEPT I GROUP I ITEM I QTY I COST IIN SVCILIFE YR CHARGE 06/30/06 COST 2101 POLICE DEPARTMENT (continued) PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC Printer Printer Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 1.0 gb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 266 mb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 266 mb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 266 mb computers Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz; 512 mb computer Dell Mini Tower 350 Mhz Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4Ghz; 512mb Computer Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.6Ghz; 1.0 gb Computer Dell GX400 Computer (add on for Sergeants office) HP LaserJet 4050 HP LaserJet 4200N $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,155 $1,155 $1,155 $1,020 $1,202 $1,126 $1,000 $2,518 $4,800 $1,809 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2004 3 2004 3 2004 3 2004 3 2007 $385 2004 3 2007 $340 NOT TO BE REPLACED 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 $442 $442 $442 $442 $442 $442 $442 $442 $442 $442 $442 $442 $442 $385 $385 $884 $884 $884 $884 $884 $884 $884 $884 $884 $884 $884 $884 $884 $770 $770 $770 $680 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,325 $1,155 $1,155 $1,155 $1,020 2004 3 2007 $375 $750 $1,126 2004 3 2007 $333 $666 $1,000 NOT TO BE REPLACED 2001 6 2007 $800 $4,000 $4,800 2003 6 2009 $302 $906 $1,809 Laptop Dell Latitude 133 Mhz Computer 3 $8,780 2002 4 2006 $2,195 $8,780 $8,780 Printer Printer Printer Printer Server Server HP Deskjet (add on for Sergeants office) HP Deskjet 970 HP Deskjets HP Color LaserJet 4550 Hub Dell Server for Tiburon Records Management System DTC 16MX Server 2201 FIRE DEPARTMENT if PC PC PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer Dell Pentium 4 Computer Dell Pentium 4 Computer 1 4 4 1 1 1 1 $220 $2,000 $1,011 $2,000 $3,000 $5,682 $5,681 COUNT 45 $67,839 1 1 1 2002 2002 2002 2002 2004 2004 2002 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 2008 2008 2008 2008 2010 2010 2008 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $1,078 2005 3 2008 $38 $333 $169 $333 $500 $947 $947 $152 $1,332 $507 $1,332 $1,000 $1,894 $3,788 $220 $2,000 $1,011 $2,000 $3,000 $5,682 $5,681 $16,281 $43,125 $64,119 $433 $433 $359 $866 $866 $359 $1,300 $1,300 $1,078 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer Laptop Toshiba PS113U-05X 1 1 $1,078 2005 3 2008 $1,350 2004 3 2007 $359 $450 $359 $1,078 $900 $1,350 Printer HP LaserJet 4050 Printer HP LaserJet 5N 1 $1,400 2000 6 2006 $233 $1,400 $1,400 1 $800 2000 6 2006 $133 $800 $800 Printer Canon 5830 Printer HP LaserJet 2200 Printer HP LaserJet 3 Printer HP DeskJet 990 CXI 1 $453 2003 1 $1,662 2003 1 $800 1998 1 $467 2003 COUNT 12 $12,988 261 6 2009 6 2009 $277 4 2002 6 2009 $76 $228 $831 $800 $78 $232 $453 $1,662 $800 $467 $3,264 $8,941 $12,988 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE COMPUTERS SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT 2005-06 BUDGET AMOUNT FY ACCUM. TOTAL REPL 2005/06 THROUGH REPL I DEPT 1 GROUP ITEM QTY1 COST IIN SVCI LIFE YR CHARGE 06/30/06 COST 4101 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 PC PC PC Printer Printer Printer Dell Pentium 4 Computer Dell Pentium 4 Computer Pentium 200 Mhz Computer System HP LaserJet 4 HP LaserJet 4 HP 970 CSE DeskJet 4201 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/BUILDING fir $1,300 2004 $1,300 2004 $1,300 2001 $1,300 2001 $1,300 2001 $300 1999 COUNT 7 $8,100 3 2007 3 2007 3 2004 6 2007 6 2007 4 2003 $433 $433 $433 $217 $217 $75 $866 $866 $1,300 $1,085 $1,085 $300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $300 $2,241 $6,802 $8,100 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 PC PC PC PC PC Printer Printer Dell Optiplex GX270T 2.4 Ghz 33 Mhz Computer System Pentium 300 Mhz Computer System Pentium 266 Mhz Computer System Pentium 300 Mhz Computer System HP IIIP LaserJet HP LaserJet 2200 4202 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 1 $1,415 2004 1 $1,000 1994 1 $1,300 2000 1 $1,300 2000 1 $1,300 2000 1 $1,300 1999 1 $1,662 2003 COUNT 9 $11,877 3 3 3 3 3 4 6 2007 2002 2003 2003 2003 2003 2009 $472 $333 $433 $433 $433 $325 $277 $944 $1,000 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $831 $1,415 $1,000 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,662 $3,572 $10,575 $11,877 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer 1 $1,300 2004 3 2007 $433 $866 $1,300 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer (Engineering Tech) 1 $1,141 2003 3 2006 $380 $1,141 $1,141 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer PC Dell Precision 340 Computer (Auto -Cad) Scanner Vidar Select Scanner (Auto -Cad) Printer HP DesignJet 800PS 42" (Auto -Cad) Printer HP LaserJet 2200DTN Printer HP LaserJet 5100 Printer HP Photosmart 1215 Printer Printer HP LaserJet 2200DN Scanner HP ScanJet 5490CXI Scanner Printer HP 825C DeskJet (temporary use for consultant) 1 $1,300 2004 3 2007 $433 1 $2,841 2004 3 2007 $947 1 $10,416 2004 6 2010 $1,736 1 $8,568 2004 6 2010 $1,428 1 $1,662 2004 6 2010 $277 1 $2,650 2003 6 2009 $442 1 $464 2003 6 2009 $77 1 $1,662 2004 6 2010 $277 1 $500 2003 4 2007 $125 1 NOT TO BE REPLACED $866 $1,894 $3,472 $2,856 $554 $1,326 $231 $277 $125 $1,300 $2,841 $10,416 $8,568 $1,662 $2,650 $464 $1,662 $500 COUNT 15 $37,704 $8,287 $18,808 $37,704 262 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE COMPUTERS SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT 2005-06 BUDGET AMOUNT FY ACCUM. TOTAL REPL 2005/06 THROUGH REPL DEPT I GROUP I ITEM QTY I COST IIN SVCILIFE YR CHARGE 06/30/06 COST 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES PC PC PC PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer Dell Pentium 4 Computer Dell Pentium 4 Computer Dell Pentium 4 Computer 1 1 1 1 $1,078 2005 3 2008 $1,078 2005 3 2008 $1,078 2005 3 2008 $1,078 2005 3 2008 $359 $359 $359 $359 $359 $359 $359 $359 $1,078 $1,078 $1,078 $1,078 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer 1 $1,300 2003 3 2006 $433 $1,300 $1,300 PC Printer Printer Printer Printer Printer Pentium 333 Mhz Computer System HP LaserJet 4 HP LaserJet 4 Plus HP LaserJet 2200 HP LaserJet 2200 HP 882C DeskJet Uninterrupted Power Supply 1204 FINANCE CASHIER ** PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC Printer Printer Printer 1 1 1 1 1 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,662 $1,662 $300 $300 2001 1999 1998 2003 2003 1998 1999 3 4 4 6 6 4 5 2004 2003 2002 2009 2009 2002 2003 $433 $325 $325 $277 $277 $75 $60 $1,300 $1,300 $800 $831 $831 $300 $300 $1,300 $1,300 $800 $1,662 $1,662 $300 $300 COUNT 13 $14,736 $4,074 $9,698 $14,236 Optiplex GX270T, 2.4 Ghz computers Optiplex GX270T, 2.4 Ghz computers Optiplex GX270T, 2.4 Ghz computers Optiplex GX270T, 2.4 Ghz computers Optiplex GX270T, 2.4 Ghz computers Pentium 233 Mhz Computer System - Cash Register Optiplex GX270T, 2.4 Ghz computers Optiplex GX270T, 2.4 Ghz computers Dell Mini Tower & Monitor (350 Mhz) HP LaserJet 2200DN HP LaserJet 4 Epson DFX-8500 Printer & accessories 1 1 1 1 $1,532 2004 3 2007 $511 $1,022 $1,532 $1,532 2004 3 2007 $511 $1,022 $1,532 $1,532 2004 3 2007 $511 $1,022 $1,532 $1,532 2004 3 2007 $511 $1,022 $1,532 $1,532 2004 3 2007 $511 $1,022 $1,532 $1,000 1999 3 2002 $333 $1,000 $1,000 $1,532 2004 3 2007 $511 $1,022 $1,532 $1,532 2004 3 2007 $511 $1,022 $1,532 $1,200 1997 3 2002 $400 $1,200 $1,200 $1,662 2004 6 2010 $277 $554 $1,662 $1,300 1994 4 1998 $325 $1,300 $1,300 $2,663 2004 6 2010 $444 $888 $2,663 Printer HP LaserJet 4050 ACC Epson Model M128C Receipt printer 1 $1,400 2000 6 2006 $233 $1,400 $1,400 1 $1,050 1999 7 2006 $150 $750 $1,050 ACC ACC ACC ACC ACC Bar Code Reader Bar Code Reader Bar Code Reader Bar Code Reader Bar Code Reader 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES ** PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer PC Dell Pentium 4 Computer Printer HP LaserJet 2200DN Printer HP 812C DeskJet Printer HP LaserJet 2200DN 1 1 1 1 1 COUNT 18 263 $372 $372 $372 $372 $372 $22,487 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 7 7 7 7 7 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 $53 $53 $53 $53 $53 $6,004 $106 $106 $106 $106 $106 $14,670 $372 $372 $372 $372 $372 $22,487 1 $1,300 2004 3 2007 $433 $866 $1,300 1 $1,300 2005 3 2008 $483 $1,300 $1,200 1 $1,300 2005 3 2008 $483 $1,300 $1,200 1 $1,662 2004 6 2010 $277 $554 $1,662 1 $800 1999 4 2003 $200 $800 $800 1 $1,662 2005 6 2011 $277 $277 $1,662 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE COMPUTERS SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT 2005-06 BUDGET AMOUNT FY ACCUM. TOTAL REPL 2005/06 THROUGH REPL DEPT I GROUP ( ITEM I QTY( COST (IN SVC(LIFE YR CHARGE 06/30/06 COST 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES (continued) ACC Hand Held Citation Writer & Accessories ACC Hand Held Citation Writer & Accessories ACC Hand Held Citation Writer & Accessories ACC Hand Held Citation Writer & Accessories ACC Hand Held Citation Writer & Accessories ACC Hand Held Citation Writer & Accessories ACC Hand Held Citation Writer & Accessories ACC Hand Held Citation Writer & Accessories ACC 8 port Hand Held Communications Base ACC Parking Meter Handheld ACC Parking Meter Handheld GRAND TOTALS 1 $3,684 2004 5 2014 $737 $1,474 $3,684 1 $3,684 2004 5 2014 $737 $1,474 $3,684 1 $3,684 2004 5 2014 $737 $1,474 $3,684 1 $3,684 2004 5 2014 $737 $1,474 $3,684 1 $3,684 2004 5 2014 $737 $1,474 $3,684 1 $3,684 2004 5 2014 $737 $1,474 $3,684 1 $3,684 2004 5 2014 $737 $1,474 $3,684 1 $3,684 2004 5 2014 $737 $1,474 $3,684 1 $3,607 2004 5 2014 $721 $1,442 $3,607 1 $5,778 2005 5 2010 $1,156 $1,156 $5,778 1 $5,778 2005 5 2010 $1,156 $1,156 $5,778 COUNT 17 $52,659 $11,082 $20,643 $52,459 COUNT 199 $357,748 $78,156 $207,861 $327,149 * All Information Systems department equipment is allocated to departments in computer replacement charges based on % of total computer equipment owned by each department. • Equipment listed In bold indicates equipment scheduled for replacement but not yet purchased. Indicates equipment scheduled for replacement in FY 2005-06 NOTE: The useful life of all printers and servers was changed to 6 years which resulted in a change to the printers scheduled for replacement in fiscal year 2003-04. 264 BUSINESS MACHINE REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE This page intentionally left blank 266 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE BUSINESS MACHINES SCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT 2005-06 BUDGET AMOUNT FY ACCUM. TOTAL REPL 2005/06 THROUGH REPL DEPT I GROUP ITEM QTY I COST IN SVCILIFE YR CHARGE 06/30/06 COST 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS Copier Canon Model 6050 (2nd Floor City Hall) 1 $13,600 1997 7 2004 $1,943 $13,600 $13,600 Copier Canon Model 6050 (1st Floor City Hall) 1 $13,600 1997 7 2004 $1,943 $13,600 $13,600 Copier Minolta Model EP2080 (Public Works Department 1 $6,965 1997 7 2004 $995 $6,965 $6,965 Fax Canon Laser 7500 Fax Machine (2nd Floor City H 1 $2,595 1997 7 2004 $371 $2,595 $2,595 Postage Neopost IJ65 Postage Meter 1 $4,200 2003 7 2010 $600 $1,800 $4,200 Postage Postage Scale 1 $950 2001 7 2008 $136 $6,806 $950 Projector Multimedia Projector & Accessories 1 $4,464 2002 7 2009 $638 $2,552 $4,464 COUNT 7 46,374 6,626 47,918 46,374 2101 POLICE DEPARTMENT Copier Xerox Document Center 555 Digital Copier 1 $12,978 2003 7 2010 $1,854 $5,562 $12,978 COUNT 1 $12,978 $1,854 $5,562 $12,978 2201 FIRE DEPARTMENT Copier Minolta Model EP2080 (Fire) 1 $6,965 1997 7 2004 $995 $6,965 $6,965 COUNT 1 $6,965 $995 $6,965 $6,965 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE Other Equip Scoreboard/Community Center Gym 1 $4,500 2005 10 2015 $450 $450 $4,500 COUNT 1 $4,500 $450 $450 $4,500 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES Copier Minolta Model EP2080 (Community Resources) 1 $6,965 1997 7 2004 $995 $6,965 $6,965 COUNT 1 $6,965 $995 $6,965 $6,965 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES Copier Minolta ModeL EP2010 (Community Services) 1 $4,763 1997 7 2004 $680 $4,763 $4,763 COUNT 1 $4,763 $680 $4,763 $4,763 GRAND TOTALS COUNT 10 $78,045 $11,600 $72,173 $78,045 EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN AREAS SPECIFIC TO A SINGLE DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN CHARGED TO THE DEPARTMENT WHERE IT IS LOCATED. REPLACEMENT COSTS ADDED TO COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHARGES IN FISCAL YEAR 2002-03. Effective 7/1/2004, maintenance costs for these machines have been moved to the Equipment Replacement Fund. Gym Scoreboard added to schedule 7/1/2004 Items listed in bold scheduled for replacement but not yet purchased or disposed of. Amortizaton for 2005-06 is based on budgeted replacement cost. 267 This page intentionally left blank 268 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ADA: Americans with Disabilities Act Appropriation: Legal authorization by the City Council to make expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes. Assessed Valuation: A dollar value placed upon real estate or other property, by Los Angeles County, as a basis for levying property taxes. Beginning Fund Balance: Fund balance available in a fund, from the end of the prior year, for use in the following year. Budget: The financial plan for the operation of a program or organization that includes an estimate of proposed expenditures for a given period of time and the proposed means of financing those expenditures. CDBG: Community Development Block Grant CDS: Continuous Deflection Separator. Clarifier unit to improve quality of storm water runoff. CUP: Conditional Use Permit Capital Improvement Project (CIP): Physical improvements which typically cost over $5,000 and will have a useful life of a year or more. Capital Improvement Projects typically improve City owned assets such as buildings, parks, streets and other infrastructure components. Capital projects often span more than one fiscal year. Capital Outlay: A budget category which accounts for all furniture, vehicles and equipment having a unit cost of $1,000 or more and a useful life of more than one year. Department: An organizational unit comprised of divisions or programs. The City of Hermosa Beach has thirteen departments: City Attorney, City Manager, City Clerk/Elections, City Council, City Prosecutor, City Treasurer, Finance, Personnel, Community Resources, Police, Fire, Community Development and Public Works. Designation: A portion of the fund balance that is "earmarked " for specific use but is still spendable. Division: An organizational unit within a department that handles a specific area of responsibility assigned to that department. 269 Expenditure: The cost of goods received or services rendered for the government unit. Fiscal Year: A 12 -month period of time to which an annual operating budget applies. The City of Hermosa Beach's fiscal year is July 1 through June 30. Fixed Asset: Tangible property items such as land, buildings, vehicles and equipment which have a value over $1000 and a life over one year. Fund: A self -balancing set of accounts. Governmental accounting information is organized into funds, each with separate revenues, expenditures and fund balances. There are four major types of funds: General, Proprietary, Special Revenue, and Trust & Agency. Definitions of these funds are found under "Explanation of City Funds on page 2. Fund Balance: The difference between a fund's assets and liabilities. Portions of the fund balance may be reserved, such as for encumbrances, or designated, such as for contingencies. Gann Appropriation Limit: Article XIIIB of the California Constitution was amended by Proposition 4, "The Gann Initiative," in 1979. This article limits the growth of governmental spending by multiplying the limit for the prior year tax proceeds by a growth factor. The 1979 base year limit amount consists of all tax proceeds appropriated in that year. Each subsequent year, the City Council adopts the revised appropriation limit annually, based on changes in the City or County population and changes in the California per capita (PCI) or nonresidential new construction. Grant: Contributions or gifts of cash or other assets from another entity. Grants are typically to be used or expended for a specific purpose. General Fund: The primary fund of the City, used to account for all revenues and expenditures of the City not legally required to be accounted for in another fund. ICRMA: Independent Cities Risk Management Authority Infrastructure: The underlying foundation or basic framework of a system or organization, such as the roads, sewers, storm drains, etc. Internal Service Charge: A charge to department budgets designed to provide for the operation, maintenance and replacement of some shared City function. The City of Hermosa Beach uses internal service charges to provide for its City-wide computer network, operation and replacement of its vehicle fleet and allocation of insurance costs. MTA: Metropolitan Transit Authority Operating Budget: The financial plan, excluding capital expenditures, for the operation of a program or organization that includes an estimate of proposed expenditures for a given period of time and the proposed means of financing those expenditures. 270 Revenue: Item or source of income, such as from taxes, licenses, permits, etc. Reserve: A portion of the fund balance that is not available for appropriation because it does not represent spendable cash or because of legal restrictions. TDA: Transportation Development Act Total (Memorandum Only) Column: The total column of the City of Hermosa Beach Budget Summary captioned "Total (Memorandum Only)" does not present consolidated financial information and is presented only to facilitate financial analysis. Interfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. Transfer: Moneys appropriated from one fund to another, in order to reimburse the fund for expenses or to finance the operation of the other fund. Transfers between a Proprietary Fund and a Governmental Fund, as in the case of the Insurance Fund, are budgeted as revenues and expenditures in the various funds, to comply with governmental accounting principles. 271 Auto/Property Insurance/Bonds Autotheft Prevention (TRAP) Beverage Recycling Block Grant General Administration Budget Summary Budget Transfers Bus Pass Subsidy Business Machine Replacement Schedule Capital Improvement Program Certificate of Award City Attorney City Clerk/Elections City Council City Manager City Manager's Budget Message City Prosecutor City Treasurer Community Development -Building Community Development -Planning Community Resources/Cable TV Community Services Commuter Express Computer Replacement Schedule C.O.P.S. Program Crossing Guards Departmental Equipment Replacement Department Requests Dial -A -Ride Dial -A -Taxi Downtown Enhancement Emission Control (AQMD) Expenditure History by Fund Expenditures by Fund Explanation — User Charge Allocation Finance Administration Finance Cashier Fire Department General Appropriations INDEX PAGE PAGE 152 Glossary 269 182 Hermosa Beach Facts 245 188 Information Systems 95 116 L. A. Impact 180 23 Liability Insurance 158 36 Lifeguard Service/Beach Maintenance 194 136 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 196 265 Bayview Drive, Lower Pier, Myrtle Avenue, Loma 223 & Beach Drive Administrative Expense 138 11 North Pier Structure/Parking Lot N 79 County Share of Revenue 200 83 Organizational Chart 9 76 Personnel 150 88 Personnel Allocation Summary 67 15 Pie Chart -Appropriations 71 104 Pie Chart -General Fund Appropriations 73 108 Pie Chart -General Fund Revenue 43 112 Pie Chart -Revenue by Source 41 114 Police Administration 166 125 Property Tax Dollar Breakdown 45 172 Prospective Expenditures 100 118 Public Works Administration 186 259 Public Works -Building Maintenance 190 170 Pub Works -Equipment Service Division 210 176 Public Works -Parks Division 198 213 Public Works -Sewers and Storm Drains 202 47 Public Works -Street Maint./Traffic Safety 204 120 Recreation Transportation 128 178 Revenue By Fund 34 192 Revenue Category Detail 247 154 Revenue History by Fund 246 270 Source Reduction/Recycling 90 248 Traffic Safety, Artesia Boulevard 206 249 Understanding The Budget 1 132 Unemployment Insurance 160 134 Used Oil Block Grant 208 142 Vehicle Replacement Schedule 253 156 Workers' Compensation 162 272 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Draft Adopted Date Prepared under contract with: Emergency Planning Consultants San Diego, California Carolyn J. Harshman, President Special Recognition The Disaster Management Area Coordinators (DMAC) of Los Angeles County prepared planning guidance that was utilized by the City of Hermosa Beach in preparing this Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. The DMAC planning guidance was based on the Mitigation Plan from Clackamas County, Oregon. The City of Hermosa Beach extends special recognition to DMAC Coordinator Michael Martinet for his editing contributions to the Hazard -Specific Sections. The City of Hermosa Beach is grateful to DMAC and the Clackamas County Natural Hazards Mitigation Committee for their contributions to this project. Special Thanks Hazard Mitigation Planning Team: City of Hermosa Beach - Russell Tingley, Fire Chief, Fire Department - Brian Scott, Captain, Fire Department - Tom Thompson, Sergeant, Police Department - Sol Blumenfeld, Director, Community Development Department - Sam Perrotti, Planning Commissioner - Rick Morgan, Director, Public Works Department - Ken Robertson, Senior Planner, Community Development Department Office of Disaster Management, Area G: Mike Martinet, Executive Director Acknowledgements Stephen Burrell, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach City Council - J.R. Reviczky, Mayor - Peter Tucker, Mayor Pro Tempore - Art Yoon, Councilmember - Sam Edgerton, Councilmember - Michael Keegan, Councilmember Mapping In addition to public internet-sourced maps, the City of Hermosa Beach provided all of the maps included in this plan. Consulting Services Project Management and Planning Services for this project were provided under contract by Emergency Planning Consultants - Project Management Services: Carolyn J. Harshman, President Planning Services: Carolyn J. Harshman, President Eric Acacio, Assistant Timothy W. Harshman, Assistant ii List of Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Tables, Maps, and Photos # Type of Table, Map, or Photo Section of the Plan Map 1-1 District Area Map of City of Hermosa Beach Section 1: Introduction Table 4-1 Federal Criteria for Risk Assessment Section 4: Risk Assessment Table 4-2 City of Hermosa Beach Critical and Essential Facilities Vulnerable to Hazards Section 4: Risk Assessment Table 5-1 Earthquake Events In Southern California Section 5: Earthquake Figure 5-1 Causes and Characteristics of Earthquakes in Southern California Section 5: Earthquake Map 5-1 Seismic Zones in California Section 5: Earthquake Map 5-2 Major Fault System of Los Angeles Basin Section 5: Earthquake Table 5-2 Liquefaction and EQ -Induced Areas in the City of Hermosa Beach — Venice Quadrangle Section 5: Earthquake Table 5-3 Liquefaction and EQ -Induced Areas in the City of Hermosa Beach — Redondo Beach Quadrangle Section 5: Earthquake Table 6-1 Major Floods of the Los Angeles River Section 6: Flood Table 6-2 Tropical Cyclones of Southern California Section 6: Flood Map 6-1 Floodplains in the City of Hermosa Beach Section 6: Flood Table 6-3 Dam Failures in Southern California Section 6: Flood Photo 6-1 Baldwin Hills Dam Section 6: Flood Table 7-1 Tsunami Events in California 1930-2004 Section 7: Tsunami Figure 7-1 Tsunami Formation Section 7: Tsunami Figure 8-1 Santa Ana Winds Section 8: Windstorms Table 8-1 Fujita Tornado Damage Scale Section 8: Windstorms Table 8-2 Santa Ana Wind Events in 2003 Section 8: Windstorms Table 8-3 Major Windstorms in the Vicinity of the City of Hermosa Beach , Section 8: Windstorms Table 8-4 Major Tornado-like Events in the Vicinity of the City of Hermosa Beach Section 8: Windstorms Table' 8-5 Beaufort Scale Section 8: Windstorms Note: The maps in this plan were provided by the City of Hermosa Beach or were acquired from public Internet sources. Care was taken in the creation of these maps, but they are provided "as is". The City of Hermosa Beach cannot accept any responsibility for any errors, omissions or positional accuracy, and therefore, there are no warranties that accompany these products (the maps). Although information from land surveys may have been used in the creation of these products, in no way does this product represent or constitute a land survey. Users are cautioned to field verify information on this product before making any decisions. iii City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Index Title Page Acknowledgments ii List of Maps iii Index iv Part I: Mitigation Actions Executive Summary Attachment 1: Mitigation Actions Matrix Section 1: Introduction Section 2: Plan Maintenance Part II: Hazard Analysis Section 3: Community Profile Section 4: Risk Assessment Section 5: Earthquakes Section 6: Flooding Section 7: Tsunami Section 8: Windstorm Part III: Resources Appendix A: Plan Resource Directory Appendix B: Public Participation Appendix C: Benefit/Cost Analysis Appendix D: List of Acronyms Appendix E: Glossary iv 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Executive Summary: Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan includes resources and information to assist City residents, public and private sector organizations, and others interested in participating in planning for natural hazards. The mitigation plan provides a list of activities that may assist the City of Hermosa Beach in reducing risk and preventing loss from future natural hazard events. The action items address multi -hazard issues, as well as activities for earthquakes, flooding, tsunamis, and windstorms. How is the Plan Organized? The Mitigation Plan contains a Mitigation Actions Matrix, background on the purpose and methodology used to develop the mitigation plan, a profile of the City of Hermosa Beach, sections on three natural hazards that occur within the City, and a number of appendices. All of the sections are described in detail in Section 1, Introduction. Who Participated in Developing the Plan? The City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan is the result of a collaborative planning effort between the City of Hermosa Beach, citizens, public agencies, non-profit organizations, the private sector, and regional and state organizations. Public participation played a key role in development of goals and action items. Interviews were conducted with stakeholders across the City, and public outreach activities were conducted to include the City of Hermosa Beach residents in plan development. The Plan was presented to the City Council at a public meeting on June 14, 2005. A Planning Team guided the process of developing the plan. The Planning Team was comprised of the following representatives: City of Hermosa Beach Russell Tingley, Fire Chief Fire Department Brian Scott, Captain Fire Department Tom Thompson, Sergeant Police Department Sol Blumenfeld, Director Community Development Department Sam Perrotti, Planning Commissioner Planning Commission Rick Morgan, Director Public Works Department Ken Robertson, Senior Planner Community Development Department Office of Disaster Management Mike Martinet, Executive Director Office of Disaster Management Area "G" Executive Summary - 1 Emergency Planning Consultants Carolyn J. Harshman, President What is the Plan Mission? The mission of the City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan is to promote sound public policy designed to protect citizens, critical facilities, infrastructure, private property, and the environment from natural hazards. This mission can be achieved by increasing public awareness, documenting the resources for risk reduction and loss - prevention, and identifying activities to guide the City towards building a Disaster Resistant Community. What are the Plan Goals? The plan goals describe the overall direction that City of Hermosa Beach agencies, organizations, and citizens can take to work toward mitigating risk from natural hazards. The goals are stepping -stones between the broad direction of the mission statement and the specific recommendations outlined in the action items. Protect Life, Environment and Property Implement activities that assist in protecting lives by making homes, businesses, infrastructure, critical facilities, and other property more resistant to losses from natural hazards. Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events while promoting insurance coverage for catastrophic hazards. Improve hazard assessment information to make recommendations for discouraging new development in high hazard areas and encouraging preventative measures for existing development in areas vulnerable to natural hazards. Public Awareness Develop and implement education and outreach programs to increase public awareness of the risks associated with natural hazards. Provide information on tools; partnership opportunities, and funding resources to assist in implementing mitigation activities. Natural Systems Balance natural resource management, and land use planning with natural hazard mitigation to protect life, property, and the environment. Preserve, rehabilitate, and enhance natural systems to serve natural hazard Executive Summary - 2 mitigation functions. Partnerships and Implementation Strengthen communication and coordinate participation among and within public agencies, citizens, non-profit organizations, business, and industry to gain a vested interest in implementation. Encourage leadership within public and private sector organizations to prioritize and implement local and regional hazard mitigation activities. Emergency Services Establish policy to ensure mitigation projects for critical facilities, services, and infrastructure. Strengthen emergency operations by increasing collaboration and coordination among public agencies, non-profit organizations, business, and industry. Coordinate and integrate natural hazard mitigation activities, where appropriate, with emergency operations plans and procedures. How are the Action Items Organized? The action items are a listing of activities in which City agencies and citizens can be engaged to reduce risk. Each action item includes an estimate of the timeline for implementation (see Executive Summary, Attachment 1: Mitigation Actions Matrix). The action items are organized within the following matrix, which lists all of the multi - hazard and hazard -specific action items included in the mitigation plan. Data collection and research and the public participation process resulted in the development of these action items (see Appendix B: Public Participation). The matrix includes the following information for each action item: Funding Source. The action items will be funded through a variety of sources, possibly including, operating budget/general fund, development fees, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Capital Improvement Program (CIP), Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), other Grants, private funding, and other funding opportunities. Coordinating Organization. The Mitigation Actions Matrix assigns primary responsibility for each of the action items. The hierarchies of the assignments vary- some are positions, other departments, and others Committees. No matter, the primary responsibility for implementing the action items falls to the entity shown as the "Coordinating Organization". The coordinating organization is the public agency with regulatory responsibility to address natural hazards, or that is Executive Summary - 3 willing and able to organize resources, find appropriate funding, or oversee implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. Coordinating organizations may include local, county, or regional agencies that are capable of or responsible for implementing activities and programs. Timeline. Action items include both short and long-term activities. Each action item includes an estimate of the timeline for implementation. Plan Goals Addressed. The plan goals addressed by each action item are included as a way to monitor and evaluate how well the mitigation plan is achieving its goals once implementation begins. The plan goals are organized into the following five areas: Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services How Will the Plan be Implemented, Monitored, and Evaluated? The Plan Maintenance Section (Section 2) of this document details the formal process that will ensure that the City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan remains an active and relevant document. The plan maintenance process includes a schedule for monitoring and evaluating the Plan annually and producing a plan revision every five years. This section describes how the City will integrate public participation throughout the plan maintenance process. Finally, this section includes an explanation of how the City of Hermosa Beach government intends to incorporate the mitigation strategies outlined in this Plan into existing planning mechanisms such as the City's General Plan, Capital Improvement Plans, and Building & Safety Codes. Plan Adoption Adoption of the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan by the local jurisdiction's governing body is one of the prime requirements for approval of the plan. Once the plan is completed, the City Council will adopt the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. The local agency governing body has the responsibility and authority to promote sound public policy regarding natural hazards. The City Manager will have authority to update and revise the plan in order to properly reflect natural hazard risks and exposures in the community. The approved Plan will be significant in the future growth and development of the community. Coordinating Body The City of Hermosa Beach Hazard Mitigation Committee will be responsible for coordinating implementation of Plan action items and undertaking the formal review Executive Summary - 4 process. The City Manager will assign representatives from City agencies, including, but not limited to, the current Hazard Mitigation Planning Team members. Convener The City of Hermosa Beach City Council will adopt the Mitigation Plan and the Hazard Mitigation Committee will take responsibility. for plan implementation. The City Manager will serve as a convener to facilitate the Committee meetings, and will assign tasks such as updating and presenting the Plan to the members of the Committee. Plan implementation and evaluation will be a shared responsibility among all of the Hazard Mitigation Committee members. Implementation through Existing Programs The City of Hermosa Beach addresses statewide planning goals and legislative requirements through its General Plan, Capital Improvement Plans, and City Building & Safety Codes. The Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan provides a series of recommendations that are closely related to the goals and objectives of these existing planning programs. The City of Hermosa Beach will have the opportunity to implement recommended mitigation action items through existing programs and procedures. Economic Analysis of Mitigation Projects The Federal Emergency Management Agency's approaches to identify costs and benefits associated with natural hazard mitigation strategies or projects fall into two general categories: benefit/cost analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Conducting benefit/cost analysis for a mitigation activity can assist communities in determining whether a project is worth undertaking now, in order to avoid disaster -related damages later. Cost- effectiveness analysis evaluates how best to spend a given amount of money to achieve a specific goal. Determining the economic feasibility of mitigating natural hazards can provide decision makers with an understanding of the potential benefits and costs of an activity, as well as a basis upon which to compare alternative projects. Formal Review Process The Mitigation Plan will be evaluated on an annual basis to determine the effectiveness of programs, and to reflect changes in land development or programs that may affect mitigation priorities. The evaluation process includes a firm schedule and timeline, and identifies the local agencies and organizations participating in plan evaluation. The convener will be responsible for contacting the Hazard Mitigation Committee members and organizing the annual meeting. Committee members will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the progress of the mitigation strategies in the Plan. Continued Public Involvement The City of Hermosa Beach is dedicated to involving the public directly in the continual . Executive Summary - 5 review and updates of the Mitigation Plan. Copies of the plan will be catalogued and made available at City Hall, Police, Fire, City Clerk, and at the public library located in the City of Hermosa Beach. The existence and location of these copies will be publicized in City e -newsletter and on the web. The Plan also includes the address and the phone number of the Community Development Department, responsible for keeping track of public comments on the Plan. Comments received by the Community Development Department shall be forwarded to the Hazard Mitigation Committee. In addition, copies of the Plan and any proposed changes will be posted on the City website. This site will also contain an email address and phone number to which people can direct their comments and concerns. Executive Summary - 6 I INIII N 1 IIIIII OM MN I I N N I NM M City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard 8 ::Cia 10 C. © u Coordinating Organization C � 8 H Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services Multi -Hazard Action Items MH #1-1 Integrate the goals and action items from the City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan into existing regulatory documents and programs, where appropriate. Hazard Mitigation Committee 1-5 years X X X X X MH #1-2 Identify and pursue funding opportunities to develop and implement local mitigation activities. Finance, Public Works, Community Development Department, Police, and Fire Ongoing X X X X X MH #1-3 Establish a formal role for the Hazard Mitigation Committee to develop a process for implementing, monitoring, and evaluating local mitigation activities. Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X MH #1-4 Identify, improve, and sustain collaborative programs focusing on the real estate and insurance industries, public and private sector organizations, non-profit organizations, and individuals to avoid activity that increases risk to natural hazards. Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X X X X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 1 City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard 8 co w 00b O u d' Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services MH #1-5 Develop inventories of at -risk buildings and infrastructure and prioritize mitigation projects. Hazard Mitigation Committee 1-2 years X X X MH #1-6 Strengthen emergency services preparedness and response by linking emergency services with natural hazard mitigation programs and enhancing public education on a local scale. Fire and Police Department Ongoing X MH #1-7 Develop, enhance, and implement education programs aimed at mitigating— natural hazards, and reducing the risk to citizens, public agencies, private property owners, businesses, and schools. -Finance, Public Works, Community Development Department, Police, and Fire Ongoing X X MH #1-8 Incorporate the requirements of the National Incident Management System (NIMS) into various aspects of the City's emergency response organization. Fire Department 2 years X MH #1-9 Promote public education to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities by providing a response/reply section on the website where residents can Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X X X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 2 I MN I M INIII I M NM MI N = M I 110111 I I MN M MN 111111 M NE N I M IINI 1 I IIIII N M City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard E CI) 0* a 0 ...1 C.) Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services comment on the current mitigation plan. Residents will be encouraged to make suggestions to future revisions of the plan. MH #1-10 Develop and implement education and outreach programs to increase public awareness of the risks associated with natural hazards. Develop a "how to" mitigation display booth to be used at special events. This display would include pictures and information, such as that contained in FEMA's Retrofitting for Homeowners Guide, Elevating Your Flood Prone Home, how to elevate critical structures and utilities and information on the NFIP. Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X X X MH #1-11 Develop a Business Continuity Planning Display. The display will be designed to raise the awareness level of why it is important to have a Business Continuity Plan, how to develop a plan, and will encourage businesses to make sure that Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X X X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 3 City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard E ° U Coordinating Organization I E F Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services their plan fits in with the City's plan. This display will be appropriate for use at local Chamber of Commerce meetings and activities, civic group gatherings and other business-related gatherings. MH #1-12 Seek funding and complete improvements to the City's EOC. Once facility upgrades and improvements are complete, train staff in changes to facility and any revisions in Standard Operating Procedures. Significant population increases during summer days should be a primary consideration as EOC upgrades and improvements are implemented. Hazard Mitigation Committee 1 year X X X X X MH #1-13 Develop an Animals In Disaster Display that will be used at the SPCA, 4-H Clubs, Agricultural Fair, in Veterinarians Offices, pet stores and other places that animal owners may gather. The display will have Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X X X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 4 NW I ININ NM N N I EN N N N NW EN I NE I NM MN ME NM I O N 11111 Ea EN 1 1 OM N E N 1 M 11111 City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard E a) 0 0 u Q' Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services information about preparing animals for disasters by making a disaster plan and a disaster supply kit for each animal. The display will encourage animal owners to decide ahead of time where animals will be sheltered. MH #1-14 Provide the City Emergency Preparedness Guidebook to hotels to be available in each room or lot for visitor's information. Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X X X Mil #1-15 Educate the public on existing self-help agencies available within the City. Create a public speaking series on hazard related topics and utilize the media for the distribution and publication of hazard information. Finance, Public Works, Community Development Department, Police, and Fire Ongoing X X X X MH #1-16 Promote and encourage Board of Education members to attend the Multi - Hazard Program for Schools through the Emergency Management Institute. Promote and expand the Mitigation Project to high school students in the Fire and Police Departments _ Ongoing X X X X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 5 City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard E co 1-4 0 0 CO Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services City. The Project focuses on mitigation projects and disaster preparedness public awareness. Provide business continuity workshops for business owners to learn the importance of disaster mitigation and how to create an emergency operations plan for their business. Maintain resource centers in City Hall. Display racks include the Emergency Preparedness Guidebook, FEMA's Are You Ready, the Special Needs Survey, brochures on disaster supplies kits and plans, etc. . MH #1-17 Identify potential funding sources outside of the City Government to continue a program of building and maintaining community partnerships, planning, public awareness and education and disaster mitigation and preparedness. Hazard Mitigation Committee 1-2 years X X X X MH #1-18 Identify opportunities for partnering with citizens, private contractors, and Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X X X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 6 N M 11111 I I I I ININ 1111 I I EN INNI I I I MN MN 11111 1111111 1111111 M MO OM V M 101111 M M MI IIIIII M IIIIIII M r City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard 8 ae N ° '... u d Coordinating Organization 41.) — to w .. H Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services other jurisdictions to increase availability of equipment and manpower for efficiency of response efforts. MH #1-19 Develop and maintain community emergency response teams (CERT). Emergency Services, Fire Department, and Police Department Ongoing X X X MH #1-20 Familiarize public officials of requirements regarding public assistance for disaster response. Hazard Mitigation Committee 1 year X X MH #1-21 Develop and complete a baseline survey to gather perceptions of private citizens and the business community regarding natural hazard risks and identify mitigation needs. Repeat the survey in five years to monitor successes and failures of natural hazard mitigation programs. Hazard Mitigation Committee 6 months/5 years X X MH #1-22 Coordinate the maintenance of emergency transportation routes though communication among the City roads department, neighboring jurisdictions, Fire and Police Departments Ongoing X X X -X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 7 City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard E 4) a 0 c0 d Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services and the County's Department of Transportation. MH #1-23 Enhance weather monitoring to attain earlier severe storm warnings. Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X X X X MH #1-24 Conduct a full review of the Natural Hazards Mitigation Action Plan every 5 years by evaluating mitigation successes, failures, and areas that were not addressed. Hazard Mitigation Committee 5 years X X X X X MH #1-25 Establish a committee representative of all areas of the City that will include vets, pet store owners, the Humane Society, animal shelters, the Extension Office and other interested parties to work on animal -specific evacuation and sheltering needs. Develop informational literature on animal disaster plans and supply kits and have them available in veterinary clinics and pet stores. Animal Control Ongoing X X X X MH #1-26 Determine what kinds of minor repairs and temporary protection activities (e.g.' temporary roofing, protect against loss Fire Department and Public Works X X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 8 EN 11111 EN 11111 INN MIN 11111 11111 11111 MI 11111 MN Ell NE III1 — s NM r-- E 1 EN In M MI EN NE MI E M NM MB City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard E d 0..•' O u Coordinating Organization °' a a� 8 d' F Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services of life/injury, shoring, protect contents) can be done in the immediate aftermath of a disaster. MH #1-27 Establish and implement the National Incident Management System (NIMS) in each agency/department. Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X X X X MH #1-28 Incorporate the training goals and objectives used by fire/EMS, law enforcement, public works, healthcare providers and other support personnel into selected hazardous material teamOngoing training. This will foster the unified command relationship that will serve as the incident management blueprint for all disaster response. Police, Fire,and Public Works X X X MH #1-29 Assess availability of backup power resources (generators) of hospitals, nursing homes, and fire, police, rescue, and emergency management personnel; upgrade resources as necessary. Police and Fire Department Ongoing X X MH Enhance response capability of City and Hazard Mitigation Ongoing X X X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 9 City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard E 0 a 0 .,. U Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services #1-30 municipal fire, police, and emergency medical services personnel to special populations. Committee MH #1-31 Routine maintenance of the community's infrastructure will be done to minimize the potential for system failure because of or during a disaster. Finance, Public Works, Community Development Department, Police, and Fire Ongoing X X X X MH #1-32 Continue to provide disaster preparedness information to the public. Police and Fire Departments Ongoing X X MH #1-33 Equip existing buildings so they can be used as shelters. Public Works Department 1-3 years X X X MH #1-34 Install and improve back-up power in critical facilities. Public Works Department 3-5 years X MHHazard #1-35 Review priorities for restoration of the community's infrastructure and vital public facilities following a disaster. Mitigation Committee 1 year X X MH #1-36 Determine which building owners (and their contractors) are responsible for hauling construction and demolition debris to proper landfills. Public Works Department 1 year X MH Determine how, when, and under what Public Works and 1 year X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 10 IIIIII N IIIIII OM NM M M 111111 1111111 IIIIII I M N I M M MI OM i 1 S S i I 1— N MO OM I N s r N— — City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard 8 a) 0.1 a S u d Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services #1-37 circumstances the government will demolish structures. Community Development Department MH #1-38 Conduct damage assessment to determine if structures are safe and capable of being used. Public Works and Community Development Department Ongoing X X MH #1-39 Review observed damage with a view toward revising codes to help mitigate damage from future disasters. Public Works and Community Development Department Ongoing X X MH #1-40 Purchase a complete GIS/GPS setup and provide training on said setup to all pertinent community personnel. Public Works Department Ongoing X X X X MH #1-41 Utility and communications systems supporting emergency services operations will be retrofitted or relocated to withstand the impacts of disasters. Public Works Department 3 years X MH #1-42 Encourage the development of mutual aid systems at the local level, including the Emergency Management Assistance Compact. Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X X X MH #1-43 Identify new sources of support such as philanthropic foundations, community Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 11 City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard 8 au mol a 0 co Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services foundations, and professional organizations such as the Urban Land Institute or American Planning Association who might be able to provide technical or financial support for recovery planning. MH #1-44 Ensure repairs or construction funded by Federal disaster assistance conform to applicable codes and standards. Community Development Department Ongoing X MH #1-45 Conduct interim planning to locate, set up, and manage temporary sites where business and government functions can continue their operations during recovery. Community Development Department, Police, and Fire 2-3 years X MH #1-46 Determine `abandoned structure' policy to determine in what instances government will demolish structures and what the process will be to accomplish this task. Community Development Department p X MH #1-47 Determine temporary protection measures; install plastic sheeting on roofs, cover exterior openings such as Community Development and Public Works Departments Ongoing X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 12 111111 N me me am gm am me me me um am um-- I am me am IIIII N 1 OM IIIII I I 1 1 M E = = I N IMIII 1 1 I City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard El 0 Cs) d' Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services windows or doors, draining trapped water in ceilings or draining accumulated flood waters, temporary shoring to avoid imminent building collapse or damage. MH #1-48 Utility and communications systems supporting emergency services operations will be retrofitted or relocated to withstand the impacts of disasters. Public Works and Fire Departments 3 years as funding allows X X MH #1-49 Adoption of updates to Uniform Building Code by municipality and adopt amendments as necessary for hazard mitigation. Community Development Department Ongoing X MH #1-50 Establish policy to ensure mitigation projects are in place to safeguard critical facilities. Public Works Department Ongoing X MH #1-51 Develop policy for government to determine what reconstruction criteria should be applied to structures damaged during a disaster. Community Development Department Ongoing X MH Integrate the goals and action items from Community Development Ongoing X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 13 City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard E av 1.0 a 0 v Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services #1-52 the City's Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan into existing regulatory documents and programs, where appropriate. Department MH #1-53 Use the mitigation plan to help the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan meet State Land Use Planning Goal designed to protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards through planning strategies that restrict development in areas of known hazards. Community Development Department Ongoing X MH #1-54 Develop public and private partnerships to foster natural hazard mitigation program coordination and collaboration in the City. Fire Department Ongoing X MH #1-55 Work with State's Office of Planning & Zoning to review regulations pertaining to the City to make sure that adequate zoning regulations are in place to reduce future development in high hazard areas. Community Development Department Ongoing X MH #1-56 Strengthen emergency operations by increasing collaboration and coordination among public agencies, Community Development Department Ongoing X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 14 E N I = NM M N OM E M MB N IIIIII 1 I I I M M N I N NM I I NM N NE I NM EM City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard E a,) .r a ' P. Q Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services non-profit organizations, business, and industry. MH #1-57 Establish measurable standards to evaluate mitigation policies and programs and provide a mechanism to update and revise the mitigation plan. Community Development Department Ongoing X MH #1-58 Encourage construction and subdivision design that can be applied to steep slopes to reduce the potential adverse impacts from development. Community Development Department Ongoing X MH #1-59 Coordinate and integrate natural hazard mitigation activities, where appropriate, with emergency operations plans and procedures. Community Development Department Ongoing X MH #1-60 Develop inventories of at -risk buildings and infrastructure and prioritize mitigation projects. Community Development Department Ongoing X MH #1-61 Encourage the development of unifying organizations to ensure communication and dissemination of natural hazard mitigation information. Community Development Department Ongoing X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 15 City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard E 6) ---� O Coordinating Organization a) ra H Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services MH #1-62 Improve communication between County DOT and City road departments to work together to prioritize and identify strategies to deal with road problems. Public Works Department Ongoing X MH #1-63 Identify critical facilities at risk from natural hazards events. Community Development Department Ongoing x MH #1-64 Support/encourage electrical utilities to use underground construction methods where possible to reduce power outages from windstorms. Community Development Department Ongoing X MH #1-65 Use technical knowledge of natural ecosystems and events to link natural resource management and land use organizations to mitigation activities and technical assistance. Community Development Department Ongoing X MH #1-66 Establish clear roles for participants, meeting regularly to pursue and evaluate implementation of mitigation strategies. Community Development Department Ongoing X MH #1-67 Improve efficiency and effectiveness of the existing City EOC through purchase of equipment, improved processes, and Hazard Mitigation Committee ASAP X X X X X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 16 I I I IIIIII IIIII MN OM OM I I I N EM = MN ME MN OM MN OM MO = M IIIMI 11110 OM I N I City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard E a.) 0 c o. ., Coordinating Organization a) c E F Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services delivery of required training. MH #1-68 Conduct a detailed vulnerability assessment in the future in order to accurately identify the extent of damages to vulnerable buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities. Hazard Mitigation Committee 1 year X X X Earthquake Action Items _ EQ #2-1 Integrate new earthquake hazard mapping data for the City of Hermosa Beach and improve technical analysis of earthquake hazards. Community Development Department Ongoing X X EQ #2-2 Identify funding sources for structural and nonstructural retrofitting of structures that are identified as seismically vulnerable. Hazard Mitigation Committee Ongoing X X EQ #2-3 Continue City strength evaluations of critical facilities in the City to identify vulnerabilities for mitigation of public infrastructure and critical facilities to meet current seismic standards. Community Development Department and Public Works Ongoing X X EQ Direct the retrofitting of un -reinforced Community Development Complete Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 17 City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard a 4) a 0 d Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services #2-4 masonry structures that are owned by the City. Department EQ #2-5 Require earthquake retrofit (tie downs) for residential improvement projects (using a 50% improvement threshold). Building Division 1 year X EQ #2-6 Tie downs required at the Marine World Mobile Home Park. Building Division 1 year X EQ #2-7 Encourage California Water Services (owner) to maintain structure integrity of water tanks. Public Works Department 1 year X X EQ #2-8 Develop and implement a public awareness campaign to retrofit homes. Hazard Mitigation Committee 1-5 years X X EQ #2-9 Minimize earthquake damage risk by retrofitting critical facilities. Public Works Department 5 years X X EQ #2-10 Integrate new earthquake hazard mapping data for the City and improve technical analysis of earthquake hazards. Public Works Department Ongoing X X EQ #2-11 Encourage reduction of nonstructural and structural earthquake hazards in homes, schools, businesses, and government offices. Community Development Department and Public Works Ongoing X X EQ Provide demonstration programs or Community Development 1-3 years X X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 18 I I I I N NIN I I N = N NM I MN M M I M M M N I NM N M 1 E I M MO City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard , E a) o0 U <i Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services #2-12 brochures regarding retrofitting the home for earthquake safety. Department and Building and Safety Division EQ #2-13 Encourage seismic strength evaluations of critical facilities in the City to identify vulnerabilities for mitigation of schools and universities, public infrastructure, and critical facilities to meet current seismic standards. Community Development Department Ongoing X Flooding Action Items FLD #3-1 Analyze each repetitive flood property within the City of Hermosa Beach and identify feasible mitigation options. Public Works Department 1-2 years X X FLD #3-2 Recommend revisions to requirements for development within the flood -prone areas, where appropriate. Community Development Ongoing X FLD #3-3 Identify and inventory City -owned flood -prone areas. Public Works Department 3 years (as funding allows) X FLD #3-4 Prepare and adopt a storm runoff ordinance. Public Works Department 1 year X X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 19 City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix Natural Hazard E 0 a 0 i v d Coordinating Organization Timeline Plan Goals Addressed Protect Life and Property Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services FLD #3-5 Record all structures within the floodplain, as well as, areas of repetitive losses due to flooding. Public Works Department 1-2 years X X X FLD #3-6 Prohibit or limit below grade construction in low-lying areas by the beach. Community Development and Public Works Departments Ongoing X FLD#3 -7 Minimize the risk of erosion through policy development. Community Development Department Ongoing X Tsunami Action Items TS#4- 1 Maintain existing warning siren systems in the Fire Station located at 540 Pier Avenue. Fire Department Ongoing X X X X X TS#4- 2 Warning Signs of Beach Public Works Department As funding allows X X X X X TS#4- 3 Tsunami Public Education Campaign Fire Department Ongoing X X X X X TS#4- 4 Install Tsunami signs and warning sirens into public education facilities. Hazard Mitigation Committee 1 year X X X TS#4- 5 Prohibit or limit below grade construction in low-lying areas by the Community Development and Public Works Ongoing X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 20 NE MN NE I E 1 I = NE I N EN NE MN EN EN NE N EN 11111 MN N M NM IN M M I NM N NEI 1 I I 11111 N 1 City of Hermosa Beach Mitigation Action Matrix et Action Item Coordinating Organization Plan Goals Addressed H CL)xE 4, as ^.a 0,-.a z 4.et: a1 4)ft to a 5z 0 v a, v 6 e) w beach. Departments TS#4- 6 Conduct a study to determine sufficient information to identify disaster -prone areas such as floodplains, earthquake fault lines, storm surge zones, etc. Community Development Department Ongoing X -, Windstorm Action Items WS #5-1 Continue to implement programs to keep trees from threatening lives, property, and public infrastructure during windstorm events. Public Works Department Ongoing X X X WS #5-2 Enhance strategies for debris management for windstorm events. Public Works Department Ongoing X X WS #5-3 Support/encourage electrical utilities to use underground construction methods where possible to reduce power outages from windstorms. Community Development Department Ongoing X X WS #5-4 Continue enforcement of wind -resistant building siting and construction codes. Community Development Department Ongoing X X WS #5-5 Develop and implement programs to keep trees from threatening lives, property, and public infrastructure Public Works Department Ongoing X Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •Executive Summary: Attachment 1- Page 22 Natural Hazard during windstorm events. Action Item Coordinating Organization Timeline Protect Life and Property Plan Goals Addressed Public Awareness Natural Systems Partnerships and Implementation Emergency Services Section 1 Introduction Throughout history, the residents of the City of Hermosa Beach have dealt with the various natural hazards affecting the area. Photos, journal entries, and newspapers show that the residents of the area have dealt with or been concerned about earthquakes, flooding, tsunamis, and windstorms. Although there were fewer people in the area, the natural hazards adversely affected the lives of those who depended on the land and climate conditions for food and welfare. As the population of the City continues to increase, the exposure to natural hazards' creates an even higher risk than previously experienced. The City of Hermosa Beach is located in the southwest quadrant of Los Angeles County, and offers the benefits of living in a Mediterranean type of climate. The City is characterized by the unique and attractive landscape that makes the area so popular. However, the potential impacts of natural hazards associated with the terrain make the environment and population vulnerable to natural disasters. The City is subject to earthquakes, flooding, tsunamis, and windstorms. It is impossible to predict exactly when these disasters will occur, or the extent to which they will affect the City. However, with careful planning and collaboration among public agencies, private sector organizations, and citizens within the community, it is possible to minimize the losses that can result from these natural disasters. A significant factor in analyzing the population and characteristics of Hermosa Beach is the summer daytime population. On a typical summer day, beach goers increase the City's population by as many as 50,000. The influx of population from the average of 20,000 to a summer average of 70,000 creates a particular challenge for the City's emergency response agencies. The City of Hermosa Beacli most recently experienced large-scale destruction during the 1983 El Nino storms and the 1994 Northridge Earthquake. The City received a Presidential Disaster, Declaration as a result of the 1994 Northridge Earthquake which resulted in federal assistance for the recovery effort. Why Develop a Mitigation Plan? As the cost of damage, from natural disasters continues to increase, the community realizes the importance of identifying effective ways to reduce vulnerability to disasters. Natural hazard mitigation plans assist communities in reducing risk from natural hazards by identifying resources, information, and strategies for risk reduction, while helping to guide and coordinate mitigation activities throughout the City. The plan provides a set of action items to reduce risk from natural hazards through Introduction - 1 education and outreach programs and to foster the development of partnerships, and implementation of preventative activities such as land use programs that restrict and control development in areas subject to damage from natural hazards. The resources and information within the Mitigation Plan: (1) Establish a basis for coordination and collaboration among agencies and the public in City of Hermosa Beach. (2) Identify and prioritize future mitigation projects; and (3) Assist in meeting the requirements of federal assistance programs. The mitigation plan works in conjunction with other City plans, including the SEMS Emergency Operations Plan. Whom Does the Mitigation Plan Affect? The City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan affects the entire City. Map 1-1 shows major roads in the City of Hermosa Beach. This plan provides a framework for planning for natural hazards. The resources and background information in the plan is applicable City-wide, and the goals and recommendations can lay groundwork for other local mitigation plans and partnerships. Map 1-1: Base Map of the City of Hermosa Beach (Source: Yahoo!) Introduction - 2 10:51/4mi 02004 Yahoo! kw Introduction - 3 Natural Hazard Land Use Policy in California Planning for natural hazards should be an integral element of any City's land use planning program. All California cities and counties have General Plans and the implementing ordinances that are required to comply with the statewide planning regulations. The continuing challenge faced by local officials and state government is to keep the network of local plans effective in responding to the changing conditions and needs of California's diverse communities, particularly in light of the very active seismic region in which we live. This is particularly true in the case of planning for natural hazards where communities must balance development pressures with detailed informationonthe nature and extent of hazards. Planning for natural hazards, calls for local plans to include inventories, policies, and ordinances to guide development in hazard areas. These inventories should include the compendium of hazards facing the community, the built environment at risk, the personal property that may be damaged by hazard events and most of all, the people who live in the shadow of these hazards. Support for Natural Hazard Mitigation All mitigation is local, and the primary responsibility for development and implementation of risk reduction strategies and policies lies with local jurisdictions. Local jurisdictions, however, are not alone. Partners and resources exist at the regional, state and federal levels. Numerous California state agencies have a role in natural hazards and natural hazard mitigation. Some of the key agencies include: • The Governor's Office of Emergency Services (OES) is responsible for disaster mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery, and the administration of federal funds after a major disaster declaration; • The Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) gathers information about earthquakes, integrates this information on earthquake phenomena, and communicates this to end-users and the general public to increase earthquake awareness, reduce economic losses, and save lives. • The California Division of Forestry (CDF) is responsible for all aspects of wild land fire protection on private, state, and administers forest practices regulations, including landslide mitigation, on non-federal lands. • The California Division of Mines and Geology (DMG) is responsible for geologic hazard characterization, public education, the development of partnerships aimed at reducing risk, and exceptions (based on science -based refinement of tsunami Introduction - 4 Inundation zone delineation) to state mandated tsunami zone restrictions; and • The California Division of Water Resources (DWR) plans, designs, constructs, operates, and maintains the State Water Project; regulates dams; provides flood protection and assists in emergency management. It also educates the public, serves local water needs by providing technical assistance. Plan Methodology Information in the Mitigation Plan is based on research from a variety of sources. Staff from the City of Hermosa Beach conducted data research and analysis, facilitated Planning Team meetings and public outreach activities, and developed the final mitigation plan. The research methods and various contributions to the plan include: Input from the Planning Team: The Planning Team convened six times to guide development of the Mitigation Plan. The Team played an integral role in developing the mission, goals, and action items for the Mitigation Plan. The Team consisted of representatives of seven local government agencies, including: City of Hermosa Beach Fire Department City of Hermosa Beach Police Department City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department City of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission City of Hermosa Beach City Council City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Department City of Hermosa Beach Planning Division Office of Disaster Management, Area G Stakeholder Interviews: City distributed copies of the Draft Mitigation Plan to individuals and specialists from organizations interested in natural hazards planning. The interviews identified common concerns related to natural hazards and identified key long and short-term activities to reduce risk from natural hazards. A complete listing of all stakeholders is located in Appendix B: Public Participation. State and federal guidelines and requirements for mitigation plans: Following are the Federal requirements for approval of a Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan: • Open public involvement, with public meetings that introduce the process and project requirements. • The public must be afforded opportunities for involvement in: identifying and assessing risk, drafting a plan, and public involvement in approval stages of the Introduction - 5 plan. • Community cooperation, with opportunity for other local government agencies, the business community, educational institutions, and non -profits to participate in the process. • Incorporation of local documents, including the local General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, the Building Codes, and other pertinent documents. The following components must be part of the planning process: • Complete documentation of the planning process • A detailed risk assessment on hazard exposures in the community • A comprehensive mitigation strategy, which describes the goals & objectives, including proposed strategies, programs & actions to avoid long-term vulnerabilities. • A plan maintenance process, which describes the method and schedule of monitoring, evaluating and updating the plan and integration of the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan into other planning mechanisms. • Formal adoption by the City Council. • Plan Review by both State OES and FEMA These requirements are spelled out in greater detail in the following plan sections and supporting documentation. Public participation opportunities were created through use of the City's website, and the City Council public meeting. In addition, the makeup of the Planning Team insured a constant exchange of data and input from outside organizations. Through its consultant, Emergency Planning Consultants, the City had access to numerous existing mitigation plans from around the country, as well as current FEMA hazard mitigation planning standards (386 series). Other reference materials consisted of county and city mitigation plans, including: Disaster Management Area Coordinators Planning Guidance Clackamas County (Oregon) Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Six County (Utah) Association of Governments Upper Arkansas Area Risk Assessment and Hazard Mitigation Plan Urbandale -Polk County, Iowa Plan Hamilton County, Ohio Plan Natural Hazard Planning Guidebook from Butler County, Ohio Hazard specific research: City of Hermosa Beach staff collected data and compiled research on three hazards: earthquakes, flooding, and tsunamis. Research materials came from the City General Plan and state agencies including OES and CDF. The City of Hermosa Beach staff identified current mitigation activities, resources and programs, and potential action items from research materials and stakeholder interviews. Introduction - 6 Public Input "6. The City of Hermosa Beach encouraged public participation and input in the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan by posting the public meetings and distributing a questionnaire. The City distributed 50 natural hazards questionnaires in City Hall and the Fire Station. See Appendix B — Public Participation for a summary of results. During the review period for the Draft Plan, copies of the Plan were available for review by interested citizens. Citizens were encouraged to review public copies of the Plan Draft and participate in the City Council public meeting which was held on June 14, 2005. Following is a summary of the public comments gathered during the City Council meeting: The resources and information cited in the Mitigation Plan provide a strong local perspective and help identify strategies and activities to make City of Hermosa Beach more disaster resistant. How Is the Plan Used? Each section of the mitigation plan provides information and resources to assist people in understanding the City and the hazard -related issues facing citizens, businesses, and the environment. Combined, the sections of the plan work together to create a document that guides the mission to reduce risk and prevent loss from future natural hazard events. The structure of the plan enables people to use a section of interest to them. It also allows City government to review and update sections when new data becomes available. The ability to update individual sections of the mitigation plan places less of a financial burden on the City. Decision -makers can allocate funding and staff resources to selected pieces in need of review, thereby avoiding a full update, which can be costly and time- consuming. New data can be easily incorporated, resulting in a natural hazards mitigation plan that remains current and relevant to City of Hermosa Beach. The Mitigation Plan is organized into three parts. Part I contains an Executive Summary, Mitigation Actions Matrix, Introduction, and Plan Maintenance. Part II contains a Community Profile, Risk Assessment, and Hazard -Specific Sections. Part III includes Resources and Appendices. Each section of the plan is described below. Introduction - 7 Part I: Mitigation Actions Executive Summary: Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The Hazard Mitigation Action Plan provides an overview of the mitigation plan mission, goals, and action items. Attachment 1: Mitigation Actions Matrix The plan action items are included in this section, and address multi -hazard issues, as well as hazard -specific activities that can be implemented to reduce risk and prevent loss from future natural hazard events. Section 1: Introduction The Introduction describes the background and purpose of developing the mitigation plan for City of Hermosa Beach. Section 2: Plan Maintenance The Plan Maintenance Section provides information on plan implementation, monitoring and evaluation. Part II: Hazard Analysis Section 3i Community Profile The Community Profile presents the history, geography, demographics, and socioeconomics of the City of Hermosa Beach. It serves as a tool to provide an historical perspective of natural hazards in the City. Section 4: Risk Assessment The Risk Assessment provides information on hazard identification, vulnerability and risk associated with natural hazards in City of Hermosa Beach. Sections 5-8: Hazard -Specific Sections Hazard -Specific Sections on the four chronic hazards is addressed in this plan. Chronic hazards occur with some regularity and may be predicted through historic evidence and scientific methods. The chronic hazards addressed in the plan are: Section 5: Earthquakes Section 6: Flooding Section 7: Tsunamis Section 8: Windstorms Introduction - 8 Each of the hazard -specific sections includes information on the history, hazard causes, hazard characteristics, and hazard assessment. Part III: Resources The plan appendices are designed to provide users of the City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan with additional information to assist them in understanding the contents of the mitigation plan, and potential resources to assist them with implementation. Appendix A: Plan Resource Directory The resource directory includes City, regional, state, and national resources and programs that may be of technical and/or financial assistance to the City of Hermosa Beach during plan implementation. Appendix B: Public Participation This appendix includes specific information on the various public processes used during development of the plan. Appendix C: Benefit/Cost Analysis This section describes FEMA's requirements for benefit cost analysis in natural hazards mitigation, as well as various approaches for conducting economic analysis of proposed mitigation activities. Appendix D: List of Acronyms This section provides a list of acronyms for City, regional, state, and federal agencies and organizations that may be referred to within the City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. Appendix E: Glossary This section provides a glossary of terms used throughout the plan. Introduction - 9 Section 2: Plan Maintenance The Plan Maintenance Section of this document details the formal process that will ensure that the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan remains an active and relevant document. The plan maintenance process includes a schedule for monitoring and evaluating the Plan annually and producing a plan revision every five years. This section describes how the City will integrate public participation throughout the plan maintenance process. Finally, this section includes an explanation of how the City of Hermosa Beach government intends to incorporate the mitigation strategies outlined in this Plan into existing planning mechanisms such as the City's General Plan, Capital Improvement Plans, and Building and Safety Codes. Monitoring and Implementing the Plan Plan Adoption The City Council will be responsible for adopting the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. This governing body has the authority to promote sound public policy regarding natural hazards. Once the plan has been adopted, the City's Fire Chief will be responsible for submitting it to the State Hazard Mitigation Officer at The Governor's Office of Emergency Services. The Governor's Office of Emergency Services will then submit the plan to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for review. This review will address the federal criteria outlined in FEMA Interim Final Rule 44 CFR Part 201. Upon acceptance by FEMA, the City will gain eligibility for Hazard Mitigation Grant Program funds. Coordinating Body The City's Mitigation Committee will be responsible for coordinating implementation of plan action items and undertaking the formal review process. The City Manager will assign representatives from City agencies, including, but not limited to, the current Hazard Mitigation Planning Team members. Initially, the Hazard Mitigation Committee will consist of the following City staff members: City of Hermosa Beach Russell Tingley, Fire Chief Fire Department Brian Scott, Captain Fire Department Tom Thompson, Sergeant Police Department Sol Blumenfeld, Director Community Development Department Sam Perrotti, Planning Commissioner Planning Commission Plan Maintenance - 1 Rick Morgan, Director Public Works Department Ken Robertson, Senior Planner Community Development Department The City's Mitigation Committee will convene annually to discuss the implementation of the Plan. These meetings will provide an opportunity to discuss the progress of the action items and maintain the partnerships that are essential for the sustainability of the Mitigation Plan. Convener The City Council will adopt the Mitigation Plan, and the Committee will take responsibility for plan implementation. The City Manager (or designee) will serve as a convener to facilitate the Committee meetings, and will assign tasks such as updating and presenting the Plan to the members of the Committee. Plan implementation and evaluation will be a shared responsibility among all of the Committee members. Implementation through Existing Programs The City addresses statewide planning goals and legislative requirements through its General Plan, Capital Improvement Plans, and City Building and Safety Codes. The Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan provides a series of recommendations - many of which are closely related to the goals and objectives of existing planning programs. The City will have the opportunity to implement recommended mitigation action items through existing programs and procedures. The City's Building & Safety Department is responsible for administering the Building & Safety Codes. In addition, the Mitigation Committee will work with other agencies at the state level to review, develop and ensure Building & Safety Codes that are adequate to mitigate or present damage by natural hazards. This is to ensure that life -safety criteria are met for new construction. The goals and action items in the mitigation plan may be achieved through activities recommended in the City's Capital Improvement Plans (CIP). Various City departments develop CIP plans, and review them on an annual basis. Upon annual review of the CIPs, the Committee will work with the City departments to identify action items in the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan consistent with CIP planning goals and integrate them where appropriate. Economic Analysis of Mitigation Projects At the Hazard Mitigation Advisory Committee's first implementation meeting, the STAPLEE Tool (Plan Maintenance — Attachment 1) or some other prioritizing tool will be utilized to prioritize the action items identified in the Mitigation Actions Matrix Plan Maintenance - 2 (Executive Summary — Attachment 1). In addition, appropriate funding sources will be identified for the "top ten" priority action items. FEMA's approaches to identify the costs and benefits associated with natural hazard mitigation strategies, measures, or projects fall into two general categories: benefit/cost analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Conducting benefit/cost analysis for a mitigation activity can assist communities in determining whether a project is worth undertaking now, in order to avoid disaster - related damages later. Cost-effectiveness analysis evaluates how best to spend a given amount of money to achieve a specific goal. Determining the economic feasibility of mitigating natural hazards can provide decision -makers with an understanding of the potential benefits and costs of an activity, as well as a basis upon which to compare alternative projects. Given federal funding, the Mitigation Committee will use a FEMA -approved benefit/cost analysis approach to identify and prioritize mitigation action items. For other projects and funding sources, the Committee will use other approaches to understand the costs and benefits of each action item and develop a prioritized list. For more information regarding economic analysis of mitigation action items, please see Appendix C: Benefit/Cost Analysis. Evaluating and Updating the Plan Formal Review Process The Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan will be evaluated on an annual basis to determine the effectiveness of programs, and to reflect changes in land development or programs that may affect mitigation priorities. The evaluation process includes a firm schedule and timeline, and identifies the local agencies and organizations participating in plan evaluation. The convener or designee will be responsible for contacting Committee members and organizing the annual meeting. The Committee members will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the progress of the mitigation strategies in the Plan. The Committee will review the goals and action items to determine their relevance to changing situations in the City, as well as changes in State or Federal policy, and to ensure they are addressing current and expected conditions. The Committee will also review the Risk Assessment portion of the Plan to determine if this information should be updated or modified, given any new available data. The coordinating organizations responsible for the various action items will report on the status of their projects, the success of various implementation processes, difficulties encountered, success of coordination efforts, and which strategies should be revised. Plan Maintenance - 3 The convener will assign the duty of updating the plan to one or more of the Committee members. The designated members will have three months to make appropriate changes to the Plan before submitting it to the Committee members, and presenting it to the City Council (or other authority). The Committee will also notify all holders of the City's Plan when changes have been made. Every five years the updated Plan will be submitted to the State Hazard Mitigation Officer and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for review. Continued Public Involvement The City is dedicated to involving the public directly in review and updates of the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. The Committee members are responsible for the annual review and update of the plan. The public will also have the opportunity to provide feedback about the Plan. Copies of the Plan will be catalogued and kept at all of the appropriate agencies in the City. The existence and location of these copies will be publicized in the City e -newsletter, which reaches every household in the City. The plan also includes the address and the phone number of the Community Development Department, responsible for keeping track of public comments on the Plan. In addition, copies of the Plan and any proposed changes will be posted on the City's Website. This site will also contain an email address and phone number to which people can direct their comments and concerns. A public meeting will also be held after each annual evaluation or as deemed necessary by the Mitigation Committee. The meetings will provide the public a forum for which they can express its concerns, opinions, or ideas about the Plan. The Mitigation Committee will be responsible for using City resources to publicize the annual public meetings and maintain public involvement through the public access cable channel, Website, and local newspapers. Plan Maintenance - 4 Plan Maintenance — Attachment 1: Simplified STAPLEE Worksheet Simplified STAPLEE Worksheet — Prioritizing Mitigation Actions (Social, Technical, Administrative, Political, Legal, Economic, Environmental) 1. Fill in the goal. Use a separate worksheet for each goal. The considerations under each criterion are suggested ones to use; you can revise these to reflect your own considerations. 2. Fill in the action items associated with the goal. 3. Scoring: For each action item, indicate a plus (+) for favorable, and a negative (-) for less favorable. When you complete the scoring, add up the positives to establish your priorities. For STAPLEE categories that do not apply, fill in N/A for not applicable. Only leave a blank if you do not know an answer — seek the input of an expert. Goal: STAPLEE Category S (Social) T (Technical) A (Administrative) P (Political) Categories (right) Action Items (below) Ac eptance Effect on Segment of Population Technical Feasibility tCommuny o m. SImpactsry Solution Staffing Allocated FundingMainten Operations / Political Support Local Champion Public Support 1. 2. , 3. 4. . ..........................._............ .. 5. 6. Plan Maintenance - 5 IMO 11111 NM 1111 N 1111111 111111 11111 N N NM N NE 11111 N 11111 111111 N I ! NM M I I I M M N-- -- N M 1= IMO STAPLEE Categories L (Legal) E (Economic) E (Environmental) Categories (right)Contributes Action Items (below) State Authority Existing Local Authority Potential Legal Challenge Benefit of Action Cost of Action to Economic Goals Outside Funding Required Effect on Land/ Water, Effect on Endangered Species Effect on HAZMAT/Waste Sites Consistent with Community Environmental Goals Consistent with Federal Laws 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Plan Maintenance - 6 Section 3: Community Profile Why Plan for Natural Hazards in City of Hermosa Beach? Natural hazards impact citizens, property, the environment, and the economy of the City of Hermosa Beach. Earthquakes, flooding, tsunamis, and windstorms have in the past or have the potential to expose Hermosa Beach residents and businesses to the financial and emotional costs of recovering after natural disasters. The risk associated with natural hazards increases as more people move to areas affected by natural hazards. Even when a community is essentially "built -out" i.e., they have little or no vacant land remaining for development; population density continues to increase when low density housing is replaced with medium and high density development projects. The inevitability of natural hazards, and the growing population and activity within the City creates a growing need to develop strategies, coordinate resources, and increase public awareness to reduce risk and prevent loss from future natural hazard events. Identifying the risks posed by natural hazards, and developing strategies to reduce the impact of a hazard event can assist in protecting life and property of citizens and , communities. Local residents and businesses can work together with the City to create a natural hazards mitigation plan that addresses the potential impacts of hazard events. Geography and the Environment The City of Hermosa Beach has an area of 1.35 square miles and is located in the southwest quadrant of Los Angeles County, bounded on the north by Manhattan Beach, on the west by the Pacific Ocean, on the east and on the south by Redondo Beach. Elevations in the City range from a high of 200 feet above sea level to a low of 0 feet at sea level. The terrain of the City is combination of both hills and flat plains. Community Profile The City of Hermosa Beach is a coastal community rich in recreational resources. Over the past decade, Hermosa Beach has grown in population and presently stands at 18,566. The area comprising the City of Hermosa Beach was first settled in 1900 and the City itself was incorporated on January 14, 1907. Historically, the development of Hermosa Beach was primarily based on agriculture and farming. Hermosa Beach is a close-knit beach community which prides itself in maintaining its cultural history through historic preservation. There are nearly 30 structures within the City that have been designated as historical resources. The preservation of historic and cultural resources can have many social and economic benefits. Familiar structures and landmarks help in establish a sense of permanence and community pride among local Community Profile - 1 residents and property owners. These resources provide both educational and aesthetic contributions to the local character. The economic benefits of historic preservation include the potential for increased property values, greater retail sales revenue, enhanced commercial rents, and greater tax revenues. The City is served by the San Diego Freeway (I-405). The major arterial highway is Pacific Coast Highway 1 (PCH -1) which runs north and south through the City. The western terminus of State Road 91 (Artesia Boulevard) is at Pacific Coast Highway. There are no active railroad lines servicing the City of Hermosa Beach. Decades ago, railroad service was provided by Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railroad (AT&SF) with tracks between Valley Drive and Ardmore Avenue throughout the City. All railroad service and activity along that path has been abandoned and tracks removed. The Old Pacific Electric Railway (Red Cars) used to run north and south down the center of Hermosa Avenue. Those tracks have since been removed. At the peak of the Electric Railway, it was possible to travel to locations throughout Los Angeles County. A variety of passenger transportation opportunities exist in the City. Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD) operates/provide five transit routes through, to, and from Hermosa Beach; WAVE, a joint operation between Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach, is 'a public response paratransit that serves both Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach; private taxis, and shuttle bus services are accessible by residents and visitors to Hermosa Beach. Major Rivers There are no major rivers with immediate potential impact on the City of Hermosa Beach. Climate Temperatures in Hermosa Beach range from 48-67 degrees Fahrenheit in the winter months to 64-77 degrees Fahrenheit in the summer months. However the temperatures can vary over a wide range, particularly when the Santa Ana winds blow, bringing higher temperatures and very low humidity. The climate of Hermosa Beach, which is to the south of the San Gabriel Mountains, is considered subtropical. Furthermore, actual rainfall in Southern California tends to fall in large amounts during sporadic and often heavy storms rather than consistently over storms at somewhat regular intervals. In short, rainfall in Southern California might be characterized as feast or famine within a single year. Because the metropolitan basin is largely built out, water originating in higher elevation communities can have a sudden impact on adjoining communities that have a lower elevation. Community Profile - 2 Minerals and Soils The characteristics of the minerals and soils present in City of Hermosa Beach can indicate potential types of hazards that may occur. Rock hardness and soil characteristics can determine whether or not an area will be prone to geologic hazards such as earthquakes and liquefaction. The surface material includes unconsolidated, fine-grained deposits of silt, sand, gravel, and recent flood plain deposits. Torrential flood events can introduce large deposits of sand and gravel. Sandy silt and silt containing clay are moderately dense and firm, and are primarily considered to be prone to liquefaction, an earthquake related hazard. Basaltic lava consists mainly of weathered and non -weathered, dense, fine-grained basalt. Though the characteristics of this lava may offer solid foundation support, landslides are common in many of these areas where weathered residual soil overlies the basalt. Understanding the geologic characteristics of City of Hermosa Beach is an important step in hazard mitigation and avoiding at -risk development. Other Significant Geologic Features Hermosa Beach, like most of the Los Angeles Basin, lies over the area of one or more known earthquake faults, and potentially many more unknown faults, particularly so- called lateral or blind thrust faults. The major faults that have the potential to affect the greater Los Angeles Basin, and therefore the City of Hermosa Beach are the: Avalon -Compton San Andreas Palos Verdes Santa Monica Newport -Inglewood The Los Angeles Basin has a history of powerful and relatively frequent earthquakes, dating back to the powerful 8.0+ 1857 San Andreas Earthquake which did substantial damage' to the relatively few buildings that existed at the time. Paleoseismological research. indicates that large (8.0+) earthquakes occur on the San Andreas Fault at intervals between 45 and 332 years with an average interval of 140 years'. Other lesser faults have also caused very damaging earthquakes since 1857. Notable earthquakes include the 1933 Long Beach Earthquake, the 1971 San Fernando Earthquake, the 1987 Whittier Earthquake and the 1994 Northridge Earthquake. In addition, many areas in the Los Angeles Basin have sandy soils that are subject to liquefaction. The City of Hermosa Beach has liquefaction zones and those zones are Peacock, Simon M., http://aamc.geo.Isa.umich.edu/eduQuakes/EQpredLab/EQprediction.peacock.html Community Profile - 3 discussed in Section 5: Earthquakes. Population and Demographics City of Hermosa Beach has a population of about 18,566 in an area of 1.3 square miles. The increase of people living in City of Hermosa Beach creates more community exposure, and changes how agencies prepare for and respond to natural hazards. For example, more people living on the urban fringe can increase risk of fire. Wildfire has an increased chance of starting due to human activities in the urban/rural interface, and has the potential to injure more people and cause more property damage. But a wildland fire is not the only exposure to the City of Hermosa Beach. In the 1987 publication, Fire Following Earthquake issued by the All Industry Research Advisory Council, Charles Scawthorn explains how a post -earthquake urban conflagration would develop. The conflagration would be started by fires resulting from earthquake damage, but made much worse by the loss of pressure in the fire mains, caused by either lack of electricity to power water pumps, and /or loss of water pressure resulting from broken fire mains. Furthermore, increased density can affect risk. For example, narrower streets are more difficult for emergency service vehicles to navigate, the higher ratio of residents to emergency responders affects response times, and homes located closer together increase the chances of fires spreading. Natural hazards do not discriminate, but the impacts in terms of vulnerability and the ability to recover vary greatly among the population. According to Peggy Stahl of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Preparedness, Training, and Exercise Directorate, 80% of the disaster burden falls on the public, and within that number, a disproportionate burden is placed upon special needs groups: women, children, minorities, and the poor.2 According the 2000 Census figures, the demographic make up of the City is as follows: The ethnic and cultural diversity suggests a need to address multi -cultural needs and services. The percentage of citizens living in poverty in the City of Hermosa Beach is about 4.6% according to the 2000 Census. Of those, 3.1% are under 18 years old, and 3.0% are over 65. 2 www.fema.gov 1 Community Profile - 4 City of Hermosa Beach Caucasian 89.6% Hispanic 6.7% African American 0.08% Asian 4.4% Native American 0.04% The ethnic and cultural diversity suggests a need to address multi -cultural needs and services. The percentage of citizens living in poverty in the City of Hermosa Beach is about 4.6% according to the 2000 Census. Of those, 3.1% are under 18 years old, and 3.0% are over 65. 2 www.fema.gov 1 Community Profile - 4 Vulnerable populations, including seniors, disabled citizens, women, and children, as well as those people living in poverty, may be disproportionately impacted by natural hazards. Another significant factor in analyzing the population and characteristics of Hermosa Beach is the summer daytime population. On a typical summer day, beach goers increase the City's population by as many as 50,000. This influx of population from under 20,000 to 70,000 creates a particularly challenging scenario for the City's emergency response agencies. Examining the reach of hazard mitigation policies to special needs populations may assist in increasing access to services and programs. FEMA's Office of Equal Rights addresses this need by suggesting that agencies and organizations planning for natural disasters identify special needs populations, make recovery centers more accessible, and review practices and procedures to remedy any discrimination in relief application or assistance. The cost of natural hazards recovery can place an unequal financial responsibility on the general population when only a small proportion may benefit from governmental funds used to rebuild private structures. Discussions about natural hazards that include local citizen groups, insurance companies, and other public and private sector organizations can help ensure that all members of the population are a part of the decision-making processes. Land and Development Development in Southern California from the earliest days was a cycle of boom and bust. The Second World War however dramatically changed that cycle. Military personnel and defense workers came to Southern California to fill the logistical needs created by the war effort. The available housing was rapidly exhausted and existing commercial centers proved inadequate for the influx of people. Immediately after the war, construction began on the freeway system, and the face of Southern California was forever changed. Home developments and shopping centers sprung up everywhere and within a few decades the central basin of Los Angeles County was virtually built out. This pushed new development further and further away from the urban center. The City of Hermosa Beach General Plan addresses the use and development of private land, including residential and commercial areas. This plan is one of the City's most important tools in addressing environmental challenges including transportation and air quality; growth management; conservation of natural resources; clean water and open spaces. The environment of most Los Angeles County cities is nearly identical with that of their immediate neighbors and the transition from one incorporated municipality to another is seamless to most people. Seamless too are the exposures to the natural hazards that affect all of Southern California. Community Profile - 5 1 Housing and Community Development Employment and Industry of City South Bay Economic Development City of Hermosa Beach Development Designations* High Density Residential (33 dwelling units/acre) 98 acres Medium Density Residential (25 dwelling units/acre) 113 acres Low Density Residential (13 dwelling units/acre) 240 acres Mobile Home Park 4 acres Commercial 84 acres Industrial 7 acres Open Space 58 acres *General Plan land use designations (acres) Housing Type Single -Family 37.5% Multi -Residential (20+ units) 11.7% Mobilehomes 0.08% Housing Statistics Total Available Housing Units 9,813 Owner -Occupied Housing 42.9% Average Household Size 2.23 Average Home Value* $850,000 Employment and Industry of City South Bay Economic Development Community Profile - 6 City of Hermosa Beach Principal Employment Activities Management (professional and related occupations) 61.2% Service Occupations 6.9% Sales and Office Occupations 25.4% Construction 3.2% Production, Transportation, and Material Moving 3.3% Community Profile - 6 Major Industries Education, Health & Social Services 15.1% manufacturing 12.2% Retail Trade 8.0% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 10.5% Mitigation activities are needed at the business level to ensure the safety and welfare of workers and limit damage to industrial infrastructure. Employees are highly mobile, commuting from surrounding areas to industrial and business centers. This creates a greater dependency on roads, communications, accessibility and emergency plans to reunite people with their families. Before a natural hazard event, large and small businesses can develop strategies to prepare for natural hazards, respond efficiently, and prevent loss of life and property. Transportation and Commuting Patterns Private automobiles are the dominant means of transportation in Southern California and in the City of Hermosa Beach. However, the City of Hermosa Beach meets its public transportation needs through the Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD), WAVE, and various taxi/shuttle services. SCRTD provides bus service to the City of Hermosa Beach and to the Los Angeles County metropolitan area. In addition to this service, the City promotes alternative transportation activities. According to the 2000 Census, the City has a population of 18,566. The mean travel time to work for the residents of the City of Hermosa Beach is 32.8 minutes. As stated in the City's General Plan, the City of Hermosa Beach is served by the I-405, connecting the area to adjoining parts of Los Angeles County. As daily transit rises, there is an increased risk that a natural hazard event will disrupt the travel plans of residents across the region, as well as local, regional and national commercial traffic. Localized flooding can render roads unusable. A severe winter storm has the potential to disrupt the daily driving routine of hundreds of thousands of people. Natural hazards can disrupt automobile traffic and shut down local and regional transit systems. Community Profile - 7 1 Section 4: Risk Assessment What is a Risk Assessment? Conducting a risk assessment can provide information: on the location of hazards, the value of existing land and property in hazard locations, and an analysis of risk to life, property, and the environment that may result from natural hazard events. Specifically, the five levels of a risk assessment are as follows: 1) Hazard Identification The Planning Team considered a range of natural hazards facing the region including: Earthquake, Flooding, Earth Movement, Windstorms, Wildfire, Tsunami, and Drought. The attached Ranking Your Hazards- Attachment 1 handout guided the Team in prioritizing the natural hazards with the highest probability of significantly impacting the City of Hermosa Beach. The Team agreed that any hazards receiving a Team score of "3" or higher would be included in the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. Utilizing the ranking technique, the Team identified Earthquakes, Windstorms, Flooding, and Tsunami as the most prominent hazards facing the community. This- is the description of the geographic extent, potential intensity and the probability of occurrence of a given hazard. Maps are frequently used to display hazard identification data. The City of Hermosa Beach identified four major hazards that affect this geographic area. These hazards - earthquakes, flooding, tsunamis, and windstorms - were identified through an extensive process that utilized input from the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team. The geographic extent of each of the identified hazards has been identified by the City of Hermosa Beach utilizing the maps contained in the City's General Plan and Internet resources are illustrated in the tables, maps, and photos listed on page iii. 2) Profiling Hazard Events This process describes the causes and characteristics of each hazard and what part of the City's population, infrastructure, and environment may be vulnerable to each specific hazard. A profile of each hazard discussed in this plan is provided in each hazard section. For a full description of the probability and history of hazard specific events, please see the appropriate Hazard- Specific Sections. Refer to Vulnerability: Location, Extent, and Probability: Risk Assessment- 1 Probability* Hazard Location (Where) Extent (How Big) Probability (How Often)* Earthquake Entire Project Area According to USGS, there is a 60% chance in the next 30 years of an earthquake measuring greater than 6.7 occurring in Southern California ' Moderate Flood Isolated Locations in the Project Area Urban Flooding Low Windstorm Entire Project Area 50 Miles per hour or greater Moderate Tsunami Coastal Area Data Not Available Low *Probability is defined as: Low = 1:500 years, Moderate = 1:100 years, High = 1:10 years The maps help to describe the causes and characteristics of each hazard and what part of the City's population, infrastructure, and environment may be vulnerable to each specific hazard. A profile of each hazard discussed in this plan is provided in each hazard section. For a full description of the history of hazard specific events, please see the appropriate hazard sections. 3) Vulnerability Assessment/Inventorying Assets This is a combination of hazard identification with an inventory of the existing (or planned) property development(s) and population(s) exposed to a hazard. Critical facilities are of particular concern because these facilities provide critical products and services to the general public that are necessary to preserve the welfare and quality of life in the City and fulfill important public safety, emergency response, and/or disaster recovery functions. The critical facilities have been identified and are illustrated in Risk Assessment Table 4-2. 4) Risk Analysis Estimating potential losses involves assessing the damage, injuries, and financial costs likely to be sustained in a geographic area over a given period of time. This level of analysis involves using mathematical models. The two measurable components of risk analysis are magnitude of the harm that may result and the likelihood of the harm occurring. Describing vulnerability in terms of dollar losses provides the community and the state with a common framework in which to measure the effects of hazards on assets. For each hazard where data was available, quantitative estimates for potential losses have been included in the hazard assessment. Data was not available to make vulnerability determinations in terms of dollar losses. The Mitigation Actions Matrix (Executive Summary — Attachment 1) includes an action item to conduct such an assessment in the future. 5) Assessing Vulnerability/ Analyzing Development Trends This step provides a general description of land uses and development trends within the community so that mitigation options can be considered in land use planning and future land use Risk Assessment- 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :c. decisions. This plan provides comprehensive description of the character of the City of Hermosa Beach in the Community Profile. This description includes the geography and environment, population and demographics, land use and development, housing and community development, employment and industry, and transportation and commuting patterns. Analyzing these components of the City of Hermosa Beach can help in identifying potential problem areas and can serve as a guide for incorporating the goals and ideas contained in this mitigation plan into other community development plans. Hazard assessments are subject to the availability of hazard -specific data. Gathering data for a hazard assessment requires a commitment of resources on the part of participating organizations and agencies. Each hazard -specific section of the plan includes a section on hazard identification using data and information from City, County or State agency sources. Regardless of the data available for hazard assessments, there are numerous strategies the City can take to reduce risk. These strategies are described in the action items detailed in each hazard section of this Plan. Mitigation strategies can further reduce disruption to critical services, reduce the risk to human life, and alleviate damage to personal and public property and infrastructure. Action items throughout the hazard sections provide recommendations to collect further data to map hazard locations and conduct hazard assessments. Federal Requirements for Risk Assessment Recent federal regulations for hazard mitigation plans outlined in 44 CFR Part 201 include a requirement for risk assessment. This risk assessment requirement is intended to provide information that will help communities to identify and prioritize mitigation activities that will reduce losses from the identified hazards. There are three hazards profiled in the mitigation plan, including earthquakes, tsunamis, and flooding. The Federal criteria for risk assessment, and information on how the City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan meets those criteria is outlined in Table 4-1 below. Risk Assessment- 3 Table 4-1: Federal Criteria for Risk Assessment Section 322 Plan Requirement How is this addressed? Identifying Hazards Each hazard section includes an inventory of the best available data sources that identify hazard areas. , To the extent data are available; the existing maps identifying the location of the hazard were utilized. The Executive Summary and the Risk Assessment sections of the plan include a list of the hazard maps. Profiling Hazard Events Each hazard section includes documentation of the history, and causes and characteristics of the hazard in the City of Hermosa Beach. Assessing Vulnerability: Identifying Assets Where data is available, the vulnerability assessment for each hazard addressed in the mitigation plan includes an inventory of all publicly owned land within hazardous areas. Each hazard section provides information on vulnerable areas in the City of Hermosa Beach in the Community Issues section. Each hazard section also identifies potential mitigation strategies. Assessing Vulnerability: Estimating Potential Losses: The Risk Assessment Section of this Mitigation Plan identifies key critical facilities in the City of Hermosa Beach and includes a map of these facilities. Vulnerability assessments have been completed for the hazards addressed in the plan, and quantitative estimates were made for each hazard where data was available. Assessing Vulnerability: Analyzing Development Trends The Community Profile Section of this Plan provides a description of the development trends in the City of Hermosa Beach, including the geography and environment, population and demographics, land use and development, housing and community development, employment and industry, and transportation and commuting patterns. Critical and Essential Facilities Facilities critical to government response and recovery activities (i.e., life safety and property and environmental protection) include: 911 centers, emergency operations centers, police and fire stations, public works facilities, communications centers, sewer and water facilities, hospitals, bridges and roads, and shelters. Also, facilities that, if damaged, could cause serious secondary impacts may also be considered "critical." A hazardous material facility is one example of this type of secondary impact critical facility. Essential facilities are those facilities that are vital to the continued delivery of key government services or that may significantly impact the public's ability to recover from the emergency. These facilities may include: buildings such as the jail, law enforcement center, public services building, community corrections center, the courthouse, and juvenile services building and other Risk Assessment- 4 1 i public facilities such as schools. Table 4-2 illustrates the critical and essential facilities serving the City of Hermosa Beach. Table 4-2: City of Hermosa Beach Critical and Essential Facilities Vulnerable to Hazards* *D to not available to dete*m�ne the extent of damages to the critical and essential facilities. WA. WI PW CI OA b 0 w y 'CS 3 'E el 0 H Facility Address X X X X Pier Pier Avenue X X X Downtown District 800-1500 Hermosa Avenue X X Water Tower 1600 Golden X X X Hermosa Valley Elementary School 1645 Valley X X X City Lifeguard 1201 The Strand X X City Yard 600 Valley Drive X X Ralph's Shopping Center 1100 Pacific Coast Highway X X Vons Shopping Center 715 Pier Avenue X X Sunrise Assisted Living 1837 Pacific Coast Highway X X Community Center 710 Pier Avenue X X Albertsons 2510 Pacific Coast Highway X X Hermosa View School K-2 1800 Prospect X X Our Lady of Guadalupe 320 Massey X X X X Marine Land Motor Home Park 531 Pier Avenue X X X Seven Pump Stations 3500 The Strand X X Verizon Switching Station 102 Pacific Coast Highway X X Little Company of Mary Hospital X X Torrance Memorial X X Harbor General Hospital Summary Natural hazard mitigation strategies can reduce the impacts concentrated at large employment and industrial centers, public infrastructure, and critical facilities. Natural hazard mitigation for industries and employers may include developing relationships with emergency management services and their employees before disaster strikes, and establishing mitigation strategies together. Collaboration among the public and private sector to create mitigation plans and actions can reduce the impacts of natural hazards. Risk Assessment- 5 Risk Assessment - Attachment 1 Ranking Your Hazards It is important to keep in mind that your rankings should be based on a hazard event that would overwhelm your jurisdiction's ability to respond effectively. For each hazard listed assign a score. Place a number in the appropriate box. Hazard Scoring,... 1 An event of that magnitude is not likely to occur 2 There is a slight chance that an event of that magnitude will occur 3 It is possible that an event of that magnitude will occur 4 An event of that magnitude has occurred here in the past and is likely to occur again 5 There is a high probability that an event of that magnitude will occur Identify any additional hazards for the jurisdiction at the end of the list labeled as "Other Hazard." Hazard Score Earthquake Flooding Wildfire Windstorm Earth Movement (Landslide/Debris Flow) Tsunami Drought Other Hazard Other Hazard Other Hazard Other Hazard Other Hazard Other Hazard Risk Assessment- 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Section 5: Earthquake Hazards in the City of Hermosa Beach Why Are Earthquakes a Threat to the City of Hermosa Beach? Earthquake — Attachment 1 Southern California Earthquake Fault Map plots the various major faults in the region. A list of Earthquake Probable Events gathered from the Southern California Earthquake Data Center is located in Earthquake — Attachment 2". The list includes various faults and projected magnitude earthquakes likely to impact the region. The Southern California Earthquake Data Center predicts that somewhere in southern California (not everywhere -many residents would not be affected) should experience a magnitude 7.0 or greater earthquake about seven times each century. About half of these will be on the San Andreas "system" (the San Andreas, San Jacinto, Imperial, and Elsinore Faults) and half will be on other faults. The equivalent probability in the next 30 years is 85%. Hermosa Beach is bounded on the southwest by the Palos Verdes Fault and on the northeast by the Newport -Inglewood Fault. Both faults are less than 5 miles from the center of the City of Hermosa Beach. The Newport -Inglewood Fault has been the source of several earthquakes in the last 70 years. The largest of these was the 1933 Long Beach quake - a magnitude 6.4 quake that caused surface fault rupture. The most recent significant earthquake event affecting Southern California was the January 17th 1994 Northridge Earthquake. At 4:31 A.M. on Monday, January 17, a moderate but very damaging earthquake with a magnitude of 6.7 struck the San Fernando Valley. In the following days and weeks, thousands of aftershocks occurred, causing additional damage to affected structures. 57 people were killed and more than 1,500 people seriously injured. For days afterward, thousands of homes and businesses were without electricity; tens of thousands had no gas; and nearly 50,000 had little or no water. Approximately 15,000 structures were moderately to severely damaged, which left thousands of people temporarily homeless. 66,500 buildings were inspected. Nearly 4,000 were severely damaged and over 11,000 were moderately damaged. Several collapsed bridges and overpasses created commuter havoc on the freeway system. Extensive damage was caused by ground shaking, but earthquake triggered liquefaction and dozens of fires also caused additional severe damage. This extremely strong ground motion in large portions of Los Angeles County resulted in record economic losses. However, the earthquake occurred early in the morning on a holiday. This circumstance considerably reduced the potential effects. Many collapsed buildings were unoccupied, and most businesses were not yet open. The direct and indirect economic losses ran into the 10's of billions of dollars. Historical and geological records show that California has a long history of seismic events. Southern California is probably best known for the San Andreas Fault, a 400 mile long fault running from the Mexican border to a point offshore, west of San Francisco. "Geologic studies show that over the past 1,400 to 1,500 years large earthquakes have occurred at about 130 year intervals on the southern San Andreas Fault. As the last large earthquake on the Southern San Andreas occurred in 1857, that section of the fault is considered a likely location for an earthquake within the next few decades.' But San Andreas is only one of dozens of known earthquake faults that crisscross Southern California. Some of the better known faults include the Newport -Inglewood, Whittier, 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Chatsworth, Elsinore, Hollywood, Los Alamitos, Puente Hills, and Palos Verdes Faults. Beyond the known faults, there are a potentially large number of "blind" faults that underlie the surface of Southern California. One such blind fault was involved'iri the October 1987 Whittier Narrows Earthquake. Although the most famous of the faults, the San Andreas, is capable of producing an earthquake with a magnitude of 8+ on the Richter Scale, some of the "lesser" faults have the potential to inflict greater damage on the urban core of the Los Angeles Basin. Seismologists believe that a 6.0 earthquake on the Newport -Inglewood would result in far more death and destruction than a "great" quake on the San Andreas, because the San Andreas is relatively remote from the urban centers of Southern California. For decades, partnerships have flourished between the USGS, Cal Tech, the California Geological Survey and universities to share research and educational efforts with Californians. Tremendous earthquake mapping and mitigation efforts have been made in California in the past two decades, and public awareness has risen remarkably during this time. Major federal, state, and local government agencies and private organizations support earthquake risk reduction, and have made significant contributions in reducing the adverse impacts of earthquakes. Despite the progress, the majority of California communities remain unprepared because there is a general lack of understanding regarding earthquake hazards among Californians. Table 5-1: Earthquake Events in the Southern California Region Southern California Region Earthquakes with a Magnitude 5.0 or Greater 1769 Los Angeles Basin 1916 Tejon Pass Region 1800 San Diego Region 1918 San Jacinto 1812 Wrightwood 1923 San Bernardino Region 1812 Santa Barbara Channel 1925 Santa Barbara 1827 Los Angeles Region 1933 Long Beach 1855 Los Angeles Region 1941 Carpenteria 1857 Great Fort Tejon Earthquake 1952 Kern County 1858 San Bernardino Region 1954 W. of Wheeler Ridge 1862 San Diego Region 1971 San Fernando 1892 San Jacinto or Elsinore Fault 1973 Point Mugu 1893 Pico Canyon 1986 North Palm Springs 1894 Lytle Creek Region 1987 Whittier Narrows 1894 E. of San Diego 1992 Landers 1899 Lytle Creek Region 1992 Big Bear 1899 San Jacinto and Hemet 1994 Northridge 1907 San Bernardino Region 1999 Hector Mine 1910 Glen Ivy Hot Springs Source: http://geology.about.com/gi/dynamic%offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fpasadena.wr.usgs.gov %2Finfo%2Fcahist_eqs.html To better understand the earthquake hazard, the scientific community has looked at historical records and accelerated research on those faults that are the sources of the earthquakes occurring in the Southern California region. Historical earthquake records can generally be divided into records of the pre -instrumental period and the instrumental period. In the absence of instrumentation, the detection of earthquakes is based on observations and felt reports, and is dependent upon population density and distribution. Since California was sparsely populated in the 1800s, the detection of pre -instrumental earthquakes is relatively difficult. However, two very large earthquakes, the Fort Tejon in 1857 (7.9) and the Owens Valley in 1872 (7.6) are evidence of the tremendously damaging potential of earthquakes in Southern California. In more recent times two 7.3 earthquakes struck Southern California, in -Kern County (1952) and Landers (1992). The damage from these four large earthquakes was limited because the occurred in areas which were sparsely populated at the time they happened. The seismic risk is much more severe today than in the past because the population at risk is in the millions, rather than a few hundred or a few thousand persons. History of Earthquake Events in Southern California Since seismologists started recording and measuring earthquakes, there have been tens of thousands of recorded earthquakes in Southern California, most with a magnitude below three. No community in Southern California is beyond the reach of a damaging earthquake. Figure 5-1 describes the historical earthquake events that have affected Southern California. Figure 5-1: Causes and Characteristics of Earthquakes in Southern California Earthquake Faults "ft"""'"� •r.......... - A fault is a fracture along between blocks of the earth's crust — where either side moves relative to the other along a parallel plane to the fracture. Strike -slip Strike -slip faults are vertical or almost vertical rifts where the earth's plates move mostly horizontally. From the observer's perspective, if the opposite block looking across the fault moves to the right, the slip style is called a right lateral fault; if the block moves left, the shift is called a left lateral fault. Dip -slip Dip -slip faults are slanted fractures where the blocks mostly shift vertically. If the earth above an inclined fault moves down, the fault is called a normal fault, but when the rock above the fault moves up, the fault is called a reverse fault. Thrust faults have a reverse fault with a dip of 45 ° or less. 4 Dr. Kerry Sieh of Cal Tech has investigated the San"Andreas Fault at Pallett Creek. "The record at Pallett Creek shows that rupture has recurred about every 130 years, on average, over the past 1500 years. But actual intervals have varied greatly, from less than 50 years to more than 300. The physical cause of such irregular recurrence remains unknown." " Damage from a great quake on the San Andreas would be widespread throughout Southern California. Earthquake Related Hazards Ground shaking, landslides, liquefaction, and amplification are the specific hazards associated with earthquakes. The severity of these hazards depends on several factors, including soil and slope conditions, proximity to the fault, earthquake magnitude, and the type of earthquake. Ground Shaking Ground shaking is the motion felt on the earth's surface caused by seismic waves generated by the earthquake. It is the primary cause of earthquake damage. The strength of ground shaking depends on the magnitude of the earthquake, the type of fault, and distance from the epicenter (where the earthquake originates). Buildings on poorly consolidated and thick soils will typically see more damage than buildings on consolidated soils and bedrock. Earthquake -Induced Landslides Earthquake -induced landslides are secondary earthquake hazards that occur from ground shaking. They can destroy the roads, buildings, utilities, and other critical facilities necessary to respond and recover from an earthquake. Many communities in Southern California have a high likelihood of encountering such risks, especially in areas with steep slopes. Liquefaction Liquefaction occurs when ground shaking causes wet granular soils to change from a solid state to a liquid state. This results in the loss of soil strength and the soil's ability to support weight. Buildings and their occupants are at risk when the ground can no longer support these buildings and structures. Many communities in Southern California are built on ancient river bottoms and have sandy soil. In some cases this ground may be subject to liquefaction, depending on the depth of the water table. Amplification Soils and soft sedimentary rocks near the earth's surface can modify ground shaking caused by earthquakes. One of these modifications is amplification. Amplification increases the magnitude of the seismic waves generated by the earthquake. The amount of amplification is influenced by the thickness of geologic materials and their physical properties. Buildings and structures built on soft and unconsolidated soils can face greater risk."' Amplification can also occur in areas with deep sediment filled basins and on ridge tops. 5 Map 5-1: Seismic Zones in California Earthquake Hazard Assessment Seismic Zones In California e. e Darker Shaded Areas indicate Greater Potential Shaking Source: USGS Website Hazard Identification In California, many agencies are focused on seismic safety issues: the State's Seismic Safety Commission, the Applied Technology Council, Governor's Office of Emergency Services, 6 United States Geological Survey, Cal Tech, the California Geological Survey as well as a number of universities and private foundations. >-s: These organizations, in partnership with other state and federal agencies, have undertaken a rigorous program in California to identify seismic hazards and risks including active fault identification, bedrock shaking, tsunami inundation zones, ground motion amplification, liquefaction, and earthquake induced landslides. Seismic hazard maps have been published and are available for many communities in California through the State Division of Mines and Geology. Map 5-2 illustrates the known earthquake faults in Southern California. Map 5-2: Major Active Surface Faults in Southern California MAJOR ACTIVE SURFACE FAULTS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 36 35 3. \ mak•' 1. San Clemente Fault 2. Palos Verdes Fault 3. Rose Canyon Fault 4. Newport -Inglewood Fault 5. Whittier Fault 6. Santa Cruz Fault 7. Malibu Coast Fault 8. Santa Monica Fault 9. Raymond Hill Fault 10. Sierra Madre Fault 11. Elsinore Fault 12. Superstition Mountain Fault 13. Superstition Hills Fault 14. Imperial Fault 15. Banning Fault 16. San Jacinto Fault 17. Pinto Mountain Fault 18. Blue Cut Fault 19. Ludlow Fault 20. Pisgah Fault 21. Calico Fault 22. West Calico Fault 23. Emerson Fault,. 24. Camprock Fault 25. Lockhart Fault 26. Lenwood Fault 27. Old Woman Springs 28. Helendale Fault 29. Sierra Frontal Fault 30. San Andreas Fault 31. Harper Fault 32. Blackwater Fault 33. Garlock Fault 34. So. Death Valley Fault 35. Panamint Valley Fault 36. Sierra Nevada Fault 37. Kern Front Fault 0 100 km 38. White Wolf Fault 39. Pleito Fault 40. Rinconada Fault 41. San Juan Fault 42. Ozena Fault 43. Santa Ynez Fault 44. Big Pine Fault 45. Pine Mountain Fault 46. San Cayetano Fault 47. San Gabriel Fault 48. Arroyo Parida Fault 49. Oakridge Fault 50. Santa Susana Fault 51. North Frontal Fault Source: Adapted from the map of major active Southern California surface faults published in "Seismic Hazards in Southern California: Probable Earthquakes, 1994-2024." Southern California Earthquake Center. In California, each earthquake is followed by revisions and improvements in the Building Codes. The 1933 Long Beach Earthquake resulted in the Field Act, affecting school construction. The 1971 Sylmar Earthquake brought another set of increased structural standards. Similar re- evaluations occurred after the 1989 Loma Prieta and 1994 Northridge Earthquakes. These code changes have resulted in stronger and more earthquake resistant structures. The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act was passed in 1972 to mitigate the hazard of surface faulting to structures for human occupancy. This state law was a direct result of the 1971 San Fernando Earthquake, which was associated with extensive surface fault ruptures that damaged numerous homes, commercial buildings, and other structures. Surface rupture is the most easily avoided seismic hazard.'" The Seismic Hazards Mapping Act, passed in 1990, addresses non -surface fault rupture earthquake hazards, including liquefaction and seismically induced landslides." The State Department of Conservation operates the Seismic Mapping Program for California. Extensive information is available at their website: http://gmw.consrv.ca.gov/skimp/index.htm Vulnerability Assessment The effects of earthquakes span a large area, and large earthquakes occurring in many parts of the Southern California region would probably be felt throughout the region. However, the degree to which the earthquakes are felt, and the damages associated with them may vary. At risk from earthquake damage are large stocks of old buildings and bridges: many high tech and hazardous materials facilities: extensive sewer, water, and natural gas pipelines; earth dams; petroleum pipelines; and other critical facilities and private property located in the county. The relative or secondary earthquake hazards, which are liquefaction, ground shaking, amplification, and earthquake -induced landslides, can be just as devastating as the earthquake. The California Geological Survey has identified areas most vulnerable to liquefaction. Liquefaction occurs when ground shaking causes wet granular soils to change from a solid state to a liquid state. This results in the loss of soil strength and the soil's ability to support weight. Buildings and their occupants are at risk when the ground can no longer support these buildings and structures. Table 5-3 identifies the local population centers in the City of Hermosa Beach that have soils vulnerable to liquefaction. The City of Hermosa Beach has liquefaction zones as shown on Maps 5-3 and 5-4. 8 Map 5-3: Liquefaction and Earthquake -Induced Landslide Zones — Venice Quadrangle - California Seismic Hazard Zone Map) (Key: Green indicates area prone to liquefaction following earthquakes; Blue indicates - area prone to landslides following earthquakes) oremokerow 00.......tot ow, t,'""1"""' SIAM OP GUJOOMNIA SEISMIC HAZARD ZONES VENKE QUAORMIGLI OfF/CIAL MAP Rt595i5ed:2055,th 25, 1999 ) 40.11.4.4.1.610 ifeadwale tem..** Ai* 1•MIe..0,111I* 4.44.10 tva=14",==rv= Map 5-4: Liquefaction and Earthquake -Induced Landslide Zones — Redondo Beach Quadrangle - California Seismic Hazard Zone Map) 9 (Key: Green indicates area prone to liquefaction following earthquakes; Blue indicates area prone to landslides following earthquakes) 1•Wi t* CM 11(}04,4 SEISMIC HAZARD) ZONES ERUONW MACH QUADRANGLE INIKAAL :eNewt]: March ). 1449 ir moor er at* Southern California has many active landslide areas, and a large earthquake could trigger accelerated movement in these slide areas, in addition to jarring loose other unknown areas of landslide risk. 10 Risk Analysis Risk analysis is the third phase of a hazard assessment. Risk analysis involves estimating the damage and costs likely to be experienced in a geographic area over a period of time' . Factors included in assessing earthquake risk include population and property distribution in the hazard area, the frequency of earthquake events, landslide susceptibility, buildings, infrastructure, and disaster preparedness of the region. This type of analysis can generate estimates of the damages to the region due to an earthquake event in a specific location. FEMA's software program, HAZUS, uses mathematical formulas and information about building stock, local geology and the location and size of potential earthquakes, economic data, and other information to estimate losses from a potential earthquake." The HAZUS software is available from FEMA at no cost. For greater Southern California there are multiple worst case scenarios, depending on which fault might rupture, and which communities are in proximity to the fault. But damage will not necessarily be limited to immediately adjoining communities. Depending on the hypocenter of the earthquake, seismic waves may be transmitted through the ground to unsuspecting communities. In the Northridge 1994 Earthquake, Santa Monica suffered extensive damage, even though there was a range of mountains between it and the origin of the earthquake. Damages for a large earthquake almost anywhere in Southern California are likely to run into the billions of dollars. Although building codes are some of the most stringent in the world, ten's of thousands of older existing buildings were built under much less rigid codes. California has laws affecting unreinforced masonry buildings (URM's) and although many building owners have retrofitted their buildings, hundreds of pre -1933 buildings still have not been brought up to current standards. The City of Hermosa Beach has 0 un -reinforced masonry buildings. Non-structural bracing of equipment and contents is often the most cost-effective type of seismic mitigation. Inexpensive bracing and anchoring may be the most cost effective way to protect expensive equipment. Non-structural bracing of equipment and furnishings will also reduce the chance of injury for the occupants of a building. Community Earthquake Issues What is Susceptible to Earthquakes? Earthquake damage occurs because humans have built structures that cannot withstand severe shaking. Buildings, airports, schools, and lifelines (highways and utility lines) suffer damage in earthquakes and can cause death or injury to humans. The welfare of homes, major businesses, and public infrastructure is very important. Addressing the reliability of buildings, critical facilities, and infrastructure, and understanding the potential costs to government, businesses, and individuals as a result of an earthquake, are challenges faced by the city. Dams There are a total of 103 dams in Los Angeles County, owned by 23 agencies or organizations, ranging from the Federal government to Homeowner's Associations."" These dams hold billions of gallons of water in reservoirs. Releases of water from the major reservoirs are designed to protect Southern California from flood waters and to store domestic water. Seismic activity can compromise the dam structures, and the resultant flooding could cause catastrophic flooding. Following the 1971 Sylmar Earthquake, the Lower Van Norman Dam showed signs of structural 11 compromise, and tens of thousands of persons had to be evacuated until the dam could be drained. The dam has never been refilled. Buildings The built environment is susceptible to damage from earthquakes. Buildings that collapse can trap and bury people. Lives are at risk and the cost to clean up the damages is great. In most California communities, including the City of Hermosa Beach, many buildings were built before 1993 when building codes were not as strict. In addition, retrofitting is not required except under certain conditions and can be expensive. Therefore, the number of buildings at risk remains high. The City of Hermosa Beach has nearly 30 structures of local historical significance, many of which are unreinforced masonry. These structures would be particularly vulnerability to structural damage associated with earthquake activity. The California Seismic Safety Commission makes annual reports on the progress of the retrofitting of unreinforced masonry buildings. Infrastructure and Communication Residents of Hermosa Beach are accustomed to commuting by automobiles and public transportation such as buses and light rail. An earthquake can greatly damage bridges and roads, hampering emergency response efforts and the normal movement of people and goods. Damaged infrastructure strongly affects the economy of the community because it disconnects people from work, school, food, and leisure, and separates businesses from their customers and suppliers. Bridge Damage Even modern bridges can sustain damage during earthquakes, leaving them unsafe for use. Some bridges have failed completely due to strong ground motion. Bridges are a vital transportation link - with even minor damages making some areas inaccessible. Because bridges vary in size, materials, location and design, any given earthquake will affect them differently. Bridges built before the mid -1970's have a significantly higher risk of suffering structural damage during a moderate to large earthquake compared with those built after 1980 when design improvements were made. Much of the interstate highway system was built in the mid to late 1960's. Caltrans has retrofitted most bridges on the freeway systems; however there are still some, county maintained bridges that are not retrofitted. The FHWA requires that bridges on the National Bridge Inventory be inspected every 2 years. Caltrans checks when the bridges are inspected because they administer the Federal funds for bridge projects. Damage to Lifelines Lifelines are the connections between communities and outside services. They include water and gas lines, transportation systems, electricity, and communication networks. Ground shaking and amplification can cause pipes to break open, power lines to fall, roads and railways to crack or move, and radio and telephone communication to cease. Disruption to transportation makes it especially difficult to bring in supplies or services. Lifelines need to be usable after earthquake to allow for rescue, recovery, and rebuilding efforts and to relay important information to the public. 12 1 1 Disruption of Critical Services Critical facilities include police stations, fire stations, hospitals, shelters, and other facilities that provide important services to the community. These facilities and their services need to be functional after an earthquake event. Many critical facilities are housed in older buildings that are not up to current seismic codes. See Section 1, Introduction for critical and essential facilities vulnerable to earthquakes. Businesses Seismic activity can cause great loss to businesses, both large-scale corporations and small retail shops. When a company is forced to stop production for just a day, the economic loss can be tremendous, especially when its market is at a national or global level. Seismic activity can create economic loss that presents a burden to large and small shop owners who may have difficulty recovering from their losses. Forty percent of businesses do not reopen after a disaster and another twenty-five percent fail within one year according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Similar statistics from the United States Small Business Administration indicate that over ninety percent of businesses fail within two years after being struck by a disaster.' Individual Preparedness Because the potential for earthquake occurrences and earthquake related property damage is relatively high in the City of Hermosa Beach, increasing individual preparedness is a significant need. Strapping down heavy furniture, water heaters, and expensive personal property, as well as being earthquake insured, and anchoring buildings to foundations are just a few steps individuals can take to prepare for an earthquake. Death and Injury Death and injury can occur both inside and outside of buildings due to collapsed buildings falling equipment, furniture, debris, and structural materials. Downed power lines and broken water and gas lines can also endanger human life. Fire Downed power lines or broken gas mains may trigger fires. When fire stations suffer building or lifeline damage, quick response to extinguish fires is less likely. Furthermore, major incidents will demand a larger share of resources, and initially smaller fires and problems will receive little or insufficient resources in the initial hours after a major earthquake event. Loss of electricity may cause a loss of water pressure in some communities, further hampering fire fighting ability. Debris After damage to a variety of structures, much time is spent cleaning up bricks, glass, wood, steel or concrete building elements, office and home contents, and other materials. Developing a strong debris management strategy is essential in post -disaster recovery. Disasters do not exempt the City of Hermosa Beach from compliance with AB 939 regulations. Existing Mitigation Activities Existing mitigation activities include current mitigation programs and activities that are being implemented by county, regional, state, or federal agencies or organizations. City of Hermosa Beach Codes 13 Implementation of earthquake mitigation policy most often takes place at the local government level. The City of Hermosa Beach Building and Safety Division enforces building codes pertaining to earthquake hazards. The ollowing sections of; the LTBC address thequake hazard: 1605:1 (Distribution of Horizonial S1i ); x1605.2Stabili a ainst yertiimin ( tY� g g) 1626 (Seismic); -1605.3 (Anchorage); and 1632, 1633, 1633.9deal wiith specific earthquake haza The City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department enforces the zoning and land use regulations relating to earthquake hazards. Generally, these codes seek to discourage development in areas that could be prone to flooding, landslide, wildfire, and seismic hazards; and where development is permitted, that the applicable construction standards are met. Developers in hazard -prone areas may be required to retain a qualified professional engineer to evaluate level of risk on the site and recommend appropriate mitigation measures. Coordination among Building Officials The City of Hermosa Beach Building Code sets the minimum design and construction standards for new buildings. In (Insert, the date,of the last update the building codes that strengthened setsnuc standards.). the City of Hermosa Beach adopted the most recent seismic standards in its building code, which requires that new buildings be built at a higher seismic standard. Since (insert date here) the City of Hermosa Beach requires that site-specific seismic hazard investigations be performed for new essential facilities, major structures, hazardous facilities, and special occupancy structures such as schools, hospitals, and emergency response facilities. Businesses/Private Sector Natural hazards have a devastating impact on businesses. In fact, of all businesses which close following a disaster, more than forty-three percent never reopen, and an additional twenty-nine percent close for good within the next two years.' The Institute of Business and Home Safety has developed "Open for Business", which is a disaster planning toolkit to help guide businesses in preparing for and dealing with the adverse affects natural hazards. The kit integrates protection from natural disasters into the company's risk reduction measures to safeguard employees, customers, and the investment itself. The guide helps businesses secure human and physical resources during disasters, and helps to develop strategies to maintain business continuity before, during, and after a disaster occurs. Hospitals "The Alfred E. Alquist Hospital Seismic Safety Act ("Hospital Act") was enacted in 1973 in response to the moderate Magnitude 6.6, 1971 Sylmar Earthquake when four major hospital campuses were severely damaged and evacuated. Two hospital buildings collapsed killing forty seven people. Three others were killed in another hospital that nearly collapsed. 14 In approving the Act, the Legislature noted that: "Hospitals, that house patients who have less than the capacity of normally healthy persons to protect themselves, and that must be reasonably capable of providing services to the public after a disaster, shall be designed and constructed to resist, insofar as practical; the forces generated by earthquakes, gravity and winds." (Health and Safety Code Section 129680) When the Hospital Act was passed in 1973, the State anticipated that, based on the regular and timely' replacement of aging hospital facilities, the majority of hospital buildings would be in compliance with the Act's standards within 25 years. However, hospital buildings were not, and are not, being replaced at that anticipated rate. In fact, the great majority of the State's urgent care facilities are now more than 40 years old. The moderate Magnitude 6.7, 1994 Northridge Earthquake caused $3 billion in hospital -related damage and evacuations. Twelve hospital buildings constructed before the Act were cited (red tagged) as unsafe for occupancy after the earthquake. Those hospitals that had been built in accordance with the 1973 Hospital Act were very successful in resisting structural damage. However, nonstructural damage (for example, plumbing and ceiling systems) was still extensive in those post -1973 buildings. Senate Bill 1953 ("SB 1953"), enacted in 1994 after the Northridge Earthquake, expanded the scope of the 1973 Hospital Act. Under SB 1953, all hospitals are required, as of January 1, 2008, to survive earthquakes without collapsing or posing the threat of significant loss of life. The 1994 Act further mandates that all existing hospitals be seismically evaluated, and retrofitted, if needed, by 2030, so that they are in substantial compliance with the Act (which requires that the hospital buildings be reasonably capable of providing services to the public after disasters). SB 1953 applies to all urgent care facilities (including those built prior to the 1973 Hospital Act) and affects approximately 2,500 buildings on 475 campuses. SB 1953 directed the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development ("OSHPD"), in consultation with the Hospital Building Safety Board, to develop emergency regulations including "...earthquake performance categories with sub gradations for risk to life, structural soundness, building contents, and nonstructural systems that are critical to providing basic services to hospital inpatients and the public after a disaster." (Health and Safety Code Section 130005) The Seismic Safety Commission Evaluation of the State's Hospital Seismic Safety Policies In 2001, recognizing the continuing need to assess the adequacy of policies, and the application of advances in technical knowledge and understanding, the California Seismic Safety Commission created an Ad Hoc Committee to re-examine the compliance with the Alquist Hospital Seismic Safety Act. The formation of the Committee was also prompted by the recent evaluations of hospital buildings reported to OSHPD that revealed that a large percentage (40%) of California's operating hospitals are in the highest category of collapse risk.".' California Earthquake Mitigation Legislation California is painfully aware of the threats it faces from earthquakes. Dating back to the 19th Century, Californians have been killed, injured, and lost property as a result of earthquakes. As the State's population continues to grow, and urban areas become even more densely developed, the risk will continue to increase. For decades the legislature has passed laws to strengthen the 15 built environment and protect the citizens. Table 5-2 provides a sampling of some of the 200 plus laws in the State's codes. Table 5-2: Partial List of the Over 200 California Laws on Earthquake Safety Government Code Section 8870-8870.95 Creates Seismic Safety Commission. Government Code Section 8876.1-8876.10 Established the California Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. Public Resources Code Section 2800-2804.6 Authorized a prototype earthquake prediction system along the Central San Andreas Fault near the City of Parkfield. Public Resources Code Section 2810-2815 Continued the Southern California Earthquake Preparedness Project and the Bay Area Regional Earthquake Preparedness Project. Health and Safety Code Section 16100-16110 The Seismic Safety Commission and State Architect will develop a state policy on acceptable levels of earthquake risk for new and existing state-owned buildings. Government Code Section 8871-8871.5 Established the California Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1986. Health and Safety Code Section 130000-130025 Defined earthquake performance standards for hospitals. Public Resources Code Section 2805-2808 Established the California Earthquake Education Project. Government Code Section 8899.10-8899.16 Established the Earthquake Research Evaluation Conference. Public Resources Code Section 2621-2630 2621. Established the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. Government Code Section 8878.50-8878.52 8878.50. Created the Earthquake Safety and Public Buildings Rehabilitation Bond Act of 1990. Education Code Section 35295-35297 35295: Established emergency procedure systems in kindergarten through grade 12 in all the public or private schools. Health and Safety Code Section 19160-19169 Established standards for seismic retrofitting of unreinforced masonry buildings. Health and Safety Code Section 1596.80-1596.879 Required all child day care facilities to include an Earthquake Preparedness Checklist as an attachment to their disaster plan. Source: http://www.leginfo.ca gov/calaw.html Earthquake Education Earthquake research and education activities are conducted at several major universities in the Southern California region, including Cal Tech, USC, UCLA, UCSB, UCI, and UCSB. The local clearinghouse for earthquake information is the Southern California Earthquake Center located at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, Telephone: (213) 740- 5843, Fax: (213) 740-0011, Email: SCEinfo@usc.edu, Website: http://www.scec.org. The Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) is a community of scientists and specialists who 16 actively coordinate research on earthquake hazards at nine core institutions, and communicate earthquake information to the public. SCEC is a National Science Foundation (NSF) Science and Technology Center and is co -funded by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). In addition, Los Angeles County along with other Southern California counties, sponsors the Emergency Survival Program (ESP), an educational program for learning how to prepare for earthquakes and other disasters. Many school districts have very active emergency preparedness programs that include earthquake drills and periodic disaster response team exercises. J 17 Earthquake — Attachment 1 Southern California Earthquake Fault Map 0 25 Miles r i KERN COUNTY . BarstowLOS ANGELES \\\ \\ COUNTY \\\ \\\ \` �Fqs \\\ SAN BERNARDINO\\ \ • • VENTURA • COUNTY Ventura \ 1 1 " - - • San Bernard no S1Fj�ju4 - \ ` Mp,*LIV F _ . \ \ • s'4 v COUNTY S / A. • Los Mgetes _ — Fed ><< '4;10 Riverside \BANNING .. ,_;_. S. G` ‘.Z7COUNTY ♦ • \ Beach \ Santa Ano \ Ft, \ \ ORANGE ‘• � \ `l \ OUN `. e \ In .tzzt:‘,;. . \' \ \ \ 'C \ AA, S. \ \ \ 4,,. •\ \ \ F . \ S. \ \` S. Fault Map SAN DIEGO'. \ Major faults '\ COUNTY \ '\ Inferred faults or offshore escarpernents 18 Earthquake - Attachment 2 Earthquake Probable Events (Source: Southern California Earthquake Data Center) Elsinore Fault Zone TYPE OF FAULTING: right -lateral strike -slip LENGTH: about 180 km (not including the Whittier, Chino, and Laguna Salada faults) NEARBY COMMUNITIES: Temecula, Lake Elsinore, Julian LAST MAJOR RUPTURE: May 15, 1910; Magnitude 6 -- no surface rupture found SLIP RATE: roughly 4.0 mm/yr INTERVAL BETWEEN MAJOR RUPTURES: roughly 250 years PROBABLE MAGNITUDES: Mw6.5 - 7.5 MOST RECENT SURFACE RUPTURE: 18th century A.D.(?) Newport -Inglewood Fault Zone TYPE OF FAULTING: right -lateral; local reverse slip associated with fault steps LENGTH: 75 km NEAREST COMMUNITIES: Culver City, Inglewood, Gardena, Compton, Signal Hill, Long Beach, Seal Beach, Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, Costa Mesa MOST RECENT MAJOR RUPTURE: March 10, 1933, Mw6.4 (but no surface rupture) SLIP RATE: 0.6 mm/yr INTERVAL BETWEEN MAJOR RUPTURES: unknown PROBABLE MAGNITUDES: Mw6.0 - 7.4 OTHER NOTES: Surface trace is discontinuous in the Los Angeles Basin, but the fault zone can easily be noted there by the existence of a chain of low hills extending from Culver City to Signal Hill. South of Signal Hill, it roughly parallels the coastline until just south of Newport Bay, where it heads offshore, and becomes the Newport - Inglewood - Rose Canyon fault zone. San Andreas Fault Zone TYPE OF FAULT: right -lateral strike -slip LENGTH: 1200 km 550 Ian south from Parkfield; 650km northward NEARBY COMMUNITY: Parkfield, Frazier Park, Palmdale, Wrightwood, San Bernardino, Banning, Indio LAST MAJOR RUPTURE: January 9, 1857 (Mojave segment); April 18, 1906 (Northern segment) SLIP RATE: about 20 to 35 mm per year INTERVAL BETWEEN MAJOR RUPTURES: average of about 140 years on the Mojave segment; recurrence interval varies greatly -- from under 20 years (at Parkfield only) to over 300 years PROBABLE MAGNITUDES: Mw6.8 - 8.0 San Fernando Fault Zone TYPE OF FAULTING: thrust LENGTH: 17 km NEAREST COMMUNITIES: San Fernando, Sunland LAST MAJOR RUPTURE: February 9, 1971, M,,,6.6 SLIP RATE: 5 min/yr (?) INTERVAL BETWEEN MAJOR RUPTURES: roughly 200 years PROBABLE MAGNITUDES: Mw6.0 - 6.8 OTHER NOTES: Dip is to the north. The slip rate is not well known, but trenching studies indicate recurrence interval as between 100 and 300 years. San Jacinto Fault Zone TYPE OF FAULTING : right -lateral strike -slip; minor right -reverse LENGTH: 210 km, including Coyote Creek fault Earthquake - 19 NEARBY COMMUNITIES: Lytle Creek, San Bemardino, Loma Linda, San Jacinto, Hemet, Anza, Borrego Springs, Ocotillo Wells MOST RECENT SURFACE RUPTURE: within the last few centuries; April 9, 1968, MW6.5 on Coyote Creek segment SLIP RATE: typically between 7 and 17 mm/yr INTERVAL BETWEEN SURFACE RUPTURES: between 100 and 300 years, per segment PROBABLE MAGNITUDES: MW6.5 - 7.5 Sierra Madre Fault System TYPE OF FAULTING: reverse - ANIMATION LENGTH: the zone is about 55 km long; total length of main fault segments is about 75 km, with each segment measuring roughly 15 km long NEARBY COMMUNITIES: Sunland, Altadena, Sierra Madre, Monrovia, Duarte, Glendora MOST RECENT SURFACE RUPTURE: Holocene SLIP RATE: between 0.36 and 4 mm/yr INTERVAL BETWEEN SURFACE RUPTURES: several thousand years (?) PROBABLE MAGNITUDES: Mw6.0 - 7.0 (?) OTHER NOTES: This fault zone dips to the north. It was not the fault responsible for the 1991 Sierra Madre earthquake. Whittier Fault TYPE OF FAULTING: right -lateral strike -slip with some reverse slip LENGTH: about 40 km NEARBY COMMUNITIES: Yorba Linda, Hacienda Heights, Whittier MOST RECENT SURFACE RUPTURE: Holocene SLIP RATE: between 2.5 and 3.0 mm/yr INTERVAL BETWEEN MAJOR RUPTURES: unknown PROBABLE MAGNITUDES: Mw6.0 - 7.2 OTHER NOTES: The Whittier fault dips toward the northeast. Earthquake - 20 End Notes ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/earthq3/when.html http://www.gps.caltech.edui—sieh/home.html Planning for Natural Hazards: The California Technical Resource Guide, Department of Land Conservation and Development (July 2000) http://www.consrv.ca.gov/CGS/rghrn/ap/ Ibid Burby, R. (Ed.) Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land Use Planning for Sustainable Communities (1998), Washington D.C., Joseph Henry Press. FEMA HAZUS http://www.fema.gov/hazus/hazus2.htm (May 2001). Source: Los Angeles County Public Works Department, March 2004 http://www.chamber101.com/programs_committee/natural disasters/DisasterPreparednes s/Forty.htm x Institute for Business and Home Safety Resources (April 2001), x' http://www.seismic.ca.gov/pub/CSSC_2001-04_Hospital.pdf Earthquake - 21 Section 6: Flooding Hazards in the City of Hermosa Beach Flooding -1 Why are Floods a Threat to the City of Hermosa Beach? The City of Hermosa Beach is not adjacent to any major rivers that pose an immediate threat from riverine flooding; however there is a threat of coastal flooding along the shoreline, and urban flooding. Coastal flooding poses a threat to life and safety, and can cause severe damage to public and private property. This flooding'can be attributed to the following mechanisms: 1) Swell runup from intense offshore winter storms in the Pacific, 2) Tsunamis from the Aleutian -Alaskan and Peru -Chile Trenches (see Hazard -Specific Section: Tsunami), 3) Runup from wind waves generated by landfalling storms, 4) Swell runup from waves generated off Baja California by tropical cyclones, and 5) Effects of landfalling tropical cyclones. - The Southern California coastline is exposed to waves generated by winter and summer storms originating in the Pacific Ocean. It is not uncommon for these storms to cause 15 -foot breakers. The occurrence of such a storm event, in combination with high astronomical tides and strong winds can cause a significant wave runup and allow storm waves to attack higher than normal elevations along the coastline. When this occurs, shoreline erosion and coastal flooding frequently results in damage to inadequately protected structures and facilities located along low- lying portions of the shoreline. The City of Hermosa Beach has not had a significant flood event since the area was first settled in the 19th century. History of Flooding in the City of Hermosa Beach The City of Hermosa Beach has large areas along the beachfront that are less than 15 -feet above sea level. Normally the very wide beach will buffer these areas from the surf. During heavy storm seasons this beach can be eroded to such an extent that these properties may be subject to wave run-up. This has happened during past "El Nino" events and during astronomical high tides. Damages have been primarily to private property and have not been documented as to extent of damages. Historic Flooding in Los Angeles County Records show that since 1811, the Los Angeles River has flooded 30 times, on average once every 6.1 years. But averages are deceiving, for the Los Angeles basin goes through periods of drought and then periods of above average rainfall. Between 1889 and 1891 the river flooded every year, and from 1941 to 1945, the river flooded 5 times. Conversely, from 1896 to 1914, a period of 18 years, and again from 1944 to 1969, a period of 25 years, the river did not have serious floods.' Flooding - 2 Table 6-1: Major Floods of the Los Angeles River Major Floods of the Los Angeles River 1811 Flooding 1815 Flooding 1825 L.A. River changed its course back from the Ballona wetlands to San Pedro 1832 Heavy flooding 1861-62 Heavy flooding. Fifty inches of rain falls during December and January. 1867 Floods create a large, temporary lake out to Ballona Creek. 1876 The Novician Deluge 1884 Heavy flooding causes the river to change course again, turning east to Vernon and then southward to San Pedro. 1888-1891 Annual floods 1914 Heavy flooding. Great damage to the harbor. 1921 Flooding 1927 Moderate flood 1934 Moderate flood starting January 1. Forty dead in La Canada. 1938 Great County -wide flood with 4 days of rain. Most rain on day 4. 1941-44 L.A. River floods five times. 1952 Moderate flooding 1969 One heavy flood after 9 day storm. One moderate flood. 1978 Two moderate floods 1979 Los Angeles experiences severe flooding and mudslides. 1980 Flood tops banks of river in Long Beach. Sepulveda Basin spillway almost opened. 1983 Flooding kills six people. 1992 15 year flood. Motorists trapped in Sepulveda basin. Six people dead. 1994 Heavy flooding Sources: http://www.lalc.k12.ca.us/target/units/river/tour/hist.html and (http://www.losangelesalmanac.com/topics/History/hi01 i.htm) While the City of Hermosa Beach is about 16 miles southwest of Los Angeles, it is not so far away as to not be affected by the heavy rains that brought flooding to Los Angeles. In addition, Flooding - 3 the towering mountains that give the Los Angeles region its' spectacular views also wring a great deal of rain out of the storm clouds that pass through. Because the mountains are so steep, the rainwater moves rapidly down the slopes and across the coastal plains on its way to the ocean. "The Santa Monica, Santa Susana and Verdugo Mountains, which surround three sides of the valley, seldom reach heights above three thousand feet. The Western San Gabriel Mountains, in contrast, have elevations of more than seven thousand feet. These higher ridges often trap eastern -moving winter storms. Although downtown Los Angeles averages just fifteen inches of rain a year, some mountain peaks in the San Gabriels receive more than forty inches of precipitation annually"2 Naturally, this rainfall moves rapidly down stream, often with severe consequences for anything in its path. In extreme cases, flood -generated debris flows will roar down a canyon at speeds near 40 miles per hour with a wall of mud, debris and water tens of feet high. In Southern California, stories of floods, debris flows, persons buried alive under tons of mud and rock and persons swept away to their death in a river flowing at thirty-five miles an hour are without end. What Factors Create Flood Risk? Flooding occurs when climate, geology, and hydrology combine to create conditions where water flows outside of its usual course. In the City of Hermosa Beach geography and climate combine to create chronic seasonal flooding conditions. Winter Rainfall Over the last 125 years, the average annual rainfall in Los Angeles is 14.9 inches. But the term "average" means very little as the annual rainfall during this time period has ranged from only 4.35 inches in 2001-2002 to 38.2 inches in 1883-1884. In fact, in only fifteen of the past 125 years, has the annual rainfall been within plus or minus 10% of the 14.9 inch average. And in only 38 years has the annual rainfall been within plus or minus 20% of the 14.9 inch average. This makes the Los Angeles basin a land of extremes in terms of annual precipitation. The climate of Hermosa Beach is considered subtropical. Major storms consist of one to several frontal systems which can last up to four or more days. Precipitation is greatly intensified due to the San Gabriel Mountains which lie in the path of storms moving from the west or southwest. The average annual rainfall ranges from 13.8 inches at sea level to 28.2 inches in the San Gabriel Mountains. Monsoons Another relatively regular source for heavy rainfall, particularly in the mountains and adjoining cities is from summer tropical storms. Table 6-2 lists tropical storms that have had significant rainfall in the past century, and the general areas affected by these storms. These tropical storms usually coincide with El Nino years. Flooding - 4 Table 6-2: Tropical Cyclones of Southern California Tropical cyclones that have affected Southern California during the 20th Century Month -Year Date(s) Area(s) Affected Rainfall July 1902 20th & 21st Deserts & Southern Mountains up to 2" Aug. 1906 18th & 19th Deserts & Southern Mountains up to 5" Sept. 1910 15th Mountains of Santa Barbara County 2" Aug. 1921 20th & 21st Deserts & Southern Mountains up to 2" Sept. 1921 30th Deserts up to 4" Sept. 1929 18th Southem Mountains & Deserts up to 4" Sept. 1932 28th - Oct 1st' Mountains & Deserts, 15 Fatalities up to 7 Aug. 1935 25th Southem Valleys, Mountains & Deserts up to 2" Sept. 1939 4th - 7th Southem Mountains, Southern & Eastern Deserts up to 7 11th & 12th Deserts, Central & Southern Mountains up to 4" 19th - 21st Deserts, Central & Southern Mountains up to 3" 25th Long Beach, W/ Sustained Winds of 50 Mph 5" Surrounding Mountains 6 to 12" Sept. 1945 9th & 10th Central & Southern Mountains up to 2" Sept. 1946 30th - Oct 1st Southern Mountains up to 4" Aug. 1951 27th - 29th Southem Mountains & Deserts 2 to 5" Sept. 1952 19th - 21st Central & Southern Mountains up to 2" July 1954 17th - 19th Deserts & Southern Mountains up to 2" July 1958 28th & 29th Deserts & Southern Mountains up .to 2" Sept. 1960 9th & 10th Julian 3.40" Sept. 1963 17th - 19th Central & Southern Mountains up to 7" Sept. 1967 1st - 3rd Southem Mountains & Deserts 2" Oct. 1972 6th Southeast Deserts up to 2" Sept. 1976 10th & 11th Central & Southern Mountains. Ocotillo, CA was Destroyed 3 Fatalities 6 to 12" Aug. 1977 n/a Los Angeles 2" Mountains up to 8" Oct. 1977 6th & 7th Southem Mountains & Deserts up to 2 Sept. 1978 5th & 6th Mountains 3" Sept. 1982 24th - 26th Mountains up to 4" Flooding - 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tropical cyclones that have affected Southern California during the 20th Century Sept. 1983 20th & 21st Southern Mountains & Deserts up to 3" http://www.fema.gov/nwz97/eln_scal.shtm Geography and Geology The greater Los Angeles Basin is the product of rainstorms and erosion for millennia. "Most of the mountains that ring the valleys and coastal plain are deeply fractured faults and, as they (the mountains) grew taller, their brittle slopes were continually eroded. Rivers and streams carried boulders, rocks, gravel, sand, and silt down these slopes to the valleys and coastal plain....In places these sediments are as much as twenty thousand feet thick"3 Much of the coastal plain rests on the ancient rock debris and sediment washed down from the mountains. This sediment can act as a sponge, absorbing vast quantities of rain in those years when heavy rains follow a dry period. But like a sponge that is near saturation, the same soil fills up rapidly when a heavy rain follows a period of relatively wet weather. So even in some years of heavy rain, flooding is minimal because the ground is relatively dry. The same amount of rain following a wet period of time can cause extensive flooding. The greater Los Angeles basin is for all intents and purposes developed. This leaves precious little open land to absorb rainfall. This lack of open ground forces water to remain on the surface and rapidly accumulate. If it were not for the massive flood control system with its concrete lined river and stream beds, flooding would be a much more common occurrence. And the tendency is towards even less and less open land. In -fill building is becoming a much more common practice in many areas. Developers tear down an older home which typically covers up to 40% of the lot size and replacing it with three or four town homes or apartments which may cover 90-95% of the lot. Another potential source of flooding is "asphalt creep." The street space between the curbs of a street is a part of the flood control system. Water leaves property and accumulates in the streets, where it is directed towards the underground portion of the flood control system. The carrying capacity of the street is determined by the width of the street and the height of the curbs along the street. Often, when streets are being resurfaced, a one to two inch layer of asphalt is laid down over the existing asphalt. This added layer of asphalt subtracts from the rated capacity of the street to carry water. Thus the original engineered capacity of the entire storm drain system is marginally reduced over time. Subsequent re -paving of the street will further reduce the engineered capacity even more. Flood Terminology Floodplain A floodplain is a land area adjacent to a river, stream, lake, estuary, or other water body that is subject to flooding. This area, if left undisturbed, acts to store excess flood water. The floodplain is made up of two sections: the floodway and the flood fringe. 100 -Year Flood Flooding - 6 The 100 -year flooding event is the flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in magnitude in any given year. Contrary to popular belief, it is not a flood occurring once every 100 years. The 100 -year floodplain is the area adjoining a river, stream, or watercourse covered by water in the event of a 100 -year flood. The City of Hermosa Beach is not included in any 100 year floodplain maps. Characteristics of Flooding Although the City is most commonly impacted by coastal flooding, given the right conditions urban flooding could pose a significant threat. In addition, any low-lying area has the potential to flood. The flooding of developed areas may occur when the amount of water generated from rainfall and runoff exceeds a storm water system's capability to remove it. Coastal Flooding Southern California low elevation coastal communities are susceptible to another form of flooding, coastal flooding. Coastal flooding event occurs when sea level tides are raised during storm conditions, bringing higher than normal tides. Storms, the time of year and the tidal cycle are factors that can bring much higher than normal tides, which cause flooding in low lying coastal areas. Coastal flooding however is limited to those areas. Urban Flooding As land is converted from fields or woodlands to roads and parking lots, it loses its ability to absorb rainfall. Urbanization of a watershed changes the hydrologic systems of the basin. Heavy rainfall collects and flows faster on impervious concrete and asphalt surfaces. The water moves from the clouds, to the ground, and into streams at a much faster rate in urban areas. Adding these elements to the hydrological systems can result in flood waters that rise very rapidly and peak with violent force. Almost 100% of the area in the City of Hermosa Beach has a high concentration of impermeable surfaces that either collect water, or concentrate the flow of water in unnatural channels. During periods of urban flooding, streets can become swift moving rivers and basements can fill with water. Storm drains often back up with vegetative debris causing additional, localized flooding. Dam Failure Flooding The City of Hermosa Beach is not presently vulnerable to any significant water reservoirs or dams. However, the threat from dam failure to other parts of Los Angeles County is significant. Loss of life and damage to structures, roads, and utilities may result from a dam failure. Economic losses can also result from a lowered tax base and lack of utility profits. Because dam failure can have severe consequences, FEMA requires that all dam owners develop Emergency Action Plans (EAP) for warning, evacuation, and post -flood actions. Although there may be coordination with county officials in the development of the EAP, the responsibility for developing potential flood inundation maps and facilitation of emergency response is the responsibility of the dam owner. For more detailed information regarding dam failure flooding, and potential flood inundation zones for a particular dam, refer to the Dam's Emergency Action Plan. Flooding - 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 There have been a total of 45 dam failures in California, since the 19th century. The significant dam failures in Southern California are listed in Table 6-3. Table 6-3: Dam Failures in Southern California Dam Failures in Southern California Sheffield Santa Barbara 1925 Earthquake slide Puddingstone Pomona 1926 Overtopping during construction Lake Hemet Palm Springs 1927 Overtopping Saint Francis San Francisquito Canyon 1928 Sudden failure at full capacity through foundation, 426 deaths Cogswell Monrovia 1934 Breaching of concrete cover Baldwin Hills Los Angeles 1963 Leak through embankment turned into washout, 3 deaths http ://cee. engr.ucdavis. edu/faculty/lund/dams/Dam_History_Page/Failures.htm The two most significant dam failures are the St. Francis Dam in 1928 and the Baldwin Hills Dam in 1963. "The failure of the St. Francis Dam, and the resulting loss of over 500 lives in the path of a roaring wall of water, was a scandal that resulted in the almost complete destruction of the reputation of its builder, William Mulholland. Mulholland was an immigrant from Ireland who rose up through the ranks of the city's water department to the position of chief engineer. It was he who proposed, designed, and supervised the construction of the Los Angeles Aqueduct, which brought water from the Owens Valley to the city. The St. Francis Dam, built in 1926, was 180 feet high and 600 feet long; it was located near Saugus in the San Francisquito Canyon. The dam gave way on March 12, 1928, three minutes before midnight. Its waters swept through the Santa Clara Valley toward the Pacific Ocean, about 54 miles away. 65 miles of valley was devastated before the water finally made its way into the ocean between Oxnard and Ventura. At its peak the wall of water was said to be 78 feet high; by the time it hit Santa Paula, 42 miles south of the dam, the water was estimated to be 25 feet deep. Almost everything in its path was destroyed: livestock, structures, railways, bridges, and orchards. By the time it was over, parts of Ventura County lay under 70 feet of mud and debris. Over 500 people were killed and damage estimates topped $20 million."4 The Baldwin Hills dam failed during the daylight hours, and was one of the first disaster events Flooding - 8 documented by a live helicopter broadcast. "The Baldwin Hills Dam collapsed with the fury of a thousand cloudbursts, sending a 50 -foot wall of water down Cloverdale Avenue and slamming into homes and cars on Dec. 14, 1963. Five people were killed. Sixty-five hillside houses were ripped apart, and 210 homes and apartments were damaged. The flood swept northward in a V-shaped path roughly bounded by La Brea Avenue and Jefferson and La Cienega Boulevards. Photo 6-1: Baldwin Hills Dam Baldwin Hills Dam - Dark spot_ in upper right hand quadrant shows the beginning of the break in the dam. The earthen dam that created a 19 -acre reservoir to supply drinking water for West Los Angeles residents ruptured at 3:38 p.m. As a pencil -thin crack widened to a 75 -foot gash, 292 million gallons surged out. It took 77 minutes for the lake to empty. But it took a generation for the neighborhood below to recover. And two decades passed before the Baldwin Hills ridge top was reborn. The cascade caused an unexpected ripple effect that is still being felt in Los Angeles and beyond. It foreshadowed the end of urban -area earthen dams as a major element of the Department of Water and Power's water storage system. It prompted a tightening of Division of Safety of Dams control over reservoirs throughout the state. The live telecast of the collapse from a KTLA-TV helicopter is considered the Flooding - 9 precursor to airborne news coverage that is now rorutine everywhere."5 Debris Flows Another flood related hazard that can affect certain parts of the Southern California region are debris flows. Most typically debris flows occur in mountain canyons and the foothills against the San Gabriel Mountains. However, any hilly or mountainous area with intense rainfall and the proper geologic conditions may experience one of these very sudden and devastating events. "Debris flows, sometimes referred to as mudslides, mudflows, lahars, or debris avalanches, are common types of fast-moving landslides. These flows generally occur during periods of intense rainfall or rapid snow melt. They usually start on steep hillsides as shallow landslides that liquefy and accelerate to speeds that are typically about 10 miles per hour, but can exceed 35 miles per hour. The consistency of debris flow ranges from watery mud to thick, rocky mud that can carry large items such as boulders, trees, and cars. Debris flows from many different sources can combine in channels, and their destructive power may be greatly increased. They continue flowing down hills and through channels, growing in volume with the addition of water, sand, mud, boulders, trees, and other materials. When the flows reach flatter ground, the debris spreads over a broad area, sometimes accumulating in thick deposits that can wreak havoc in developed areas."6 What is the Effect of Development on Floods? When structures or fill are placed in the floodway or floodplain water is displaced. Development raises the river levels by forcing the river to compensate for the flow space obstructed by the inserted structures and/or fill. When structures or materials are added to the floodway or floodplain and no fill is removed to compensate, serious problems can arise. Flood waters may be forced away from historic floodplain areas. As a result, other existing floodplain areas may experience flood waters that rise above historic levels. Local governments must require engineer certification to ensure that proposed developments will not adversely affect the flood carrying capacity of the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). Displacement of only a few inches of water can mean the difference between no structural damage occurring in a given flood event, and the inundation of many homes, businesses, and other facilities. Careful attention should be given to development that occurs within the floodway to ensure that structures are prepared to withstand base flood events. In highly urbanized areas, increased paving can lead to an increase in volume and velocity of runoff after a rainfall event, exacerbating the potential flood hazards. Care should be taken in the development and implementation of storm water management systems to ensure that these runoff waters are dealt with effectively. How are Flood -Prone Areas Identified? Flood maps and Flood Insurance Studies (FIS) are often used to identify flood -prone areas. The NFIP was established in 1968 as a means of providing low-cost flood insurance to the nation's flood -prone communities. The NFIP also reduces flood losses through regulations that focus on building codes and sound floodplain management. NFIP regulations (44 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Chapter 1, Section 60, 3) require that all new construction in floodplains must be elevated at or above base flood level. Flooding - 10 Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) and Flood Insurance Studies (FIS) Floodplain maps are the basis for implementing floodplain regulations and for delineating flood insurance purchase requirements. A Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) is the official map produced by FEMA which delineates SFHA in communities where NFIP regulations apply. FIRMs are also used by insurance agents and mortgage lenders to determine if flood insurance is required and what insurance rates should apply. Water surface elevations are combined with topographic data to develop FIRMs. FIRMS illustrate areas that would be inundated during a 100 -year flood, floodway areas, and elevations marking the 100 -year -flood level. In some cases they also include base flood elevations (BFEs) and areas located within the 500 -year floodplain. Flood Insurance Studies and FIRMs produced for the NFIP provide assessments of the probability of flooding at a 'given location. FEMA conducted many Flood Insurance Studies in the late 1970s and early 1980s. These studies and maps represent flood risk at the point in time when FEMA completed the studies. However, it is important to note that not all 100 -year or 500 -year floodplains have been mapped by FEMA. None of the total population in the City of Hermosa Beach is located in a 100 year floodplain. Hazard Assessment Hazard Identification Hazard identification is the first phase of flood -hazard assessment. Identification is the process of estimating: 1) the geographic extent of the floodplain (i.e., the area at risk from flooding); 2) the intensity of the flooding that can be expected in specific areas of the floodplain; and 3) the probability of occurrence of flood events. This process usually results in the creation of a floodplain map. Floodplain maps provide detailed information that can assist jurisdictions in making policies and land -use decisions. Vulnerability Assessment Vulnerability assessment is the second step of flood -hazard assessment. It combines the floodplain boundary, generated through hazard identification, with an inventory of the property within the floodplain. Understanding the population and property exposed to natural hazards will assist in reducing risk and preventing loss from future events. Because site-specific inventory data and inundation levels given for a particular flood event (10 -year, 25 -year, 50 -year, 100 -year, 500 -year) are not readily available, calculating a community's vulnerability to flood events is not straightforward. The amount of property in the floodplain, as well as the type and value of structures on those properties, should be calculated to provide a working estimate for potential flood losses. Disruption of Critical Services Critical care facilities include police stations, fire stations, hospitals, shelters, and other facilities that provide important services to the community. These facilities and their services need to be functional after a flooding event. Vulnerability of these facilities is indicated in Risk Assessment Table 4-2. Risk Analysis Flooding - 11 Risk analysis is the third and most advanced phase of a hazard assessment. It builds upon the hazard identification and vulnerability assessment. A flood risk analysis for the City of Hermosa Beach should include two components: (1) the life and value of property that may incur losses from a flood event (defined through the vulnerability assessment); and (2) the number and type of flood events expected to occur over time. Within the broad components of a risk analysis, it is possible to predict the severity of damage from a range of events. Flow velocity models can assist in predicting the amount of damage expected from different magnitudes of flood events. The data used to develop these models is based on hydrological analysis of landscape features. Changes in the landscape, often associated with human development, can alter the flow velocity and the severity of damage that can be expected from a flood event. Using GIS technology and flow velocity models, it is possible to map the damage that can be expected from flood events over time. It is also possible to pinpoint the effects of certain flood events on individual properties. At the time of publication of this plan, data was insufficient to conduct a risk analysis for flood events in the City of Hermosa Beach. However, the current mapping projects will result in better data that will assist in understanding risk. This plan includes recommendations for building partnerships that will support the development of a flood risk analysis in the City of Hermosa Beach. Community Flood Issues What is Susceptible to Damage During a Flood Event? The largest impact on communities from flood events is the loss of life and property. During certain years, property losses resulting from flood damage are extensive. Development in the coastal areas of the City of Hermosa Beach will continue to be at risk from flooding. Property loss from floods strikes both private and public property. Property Loss Resulting from Flooding Events The type of property damage caused by flood events depends on the depth and velocity of the flood waters. Faster moving flood waters can wash buildings off their foundations and sweep cars downstream. Pipelines, bridges, and other infrastructure can be damaged when high waters combine with flood debris. Extensive damage can be caused by basement flooding and landslide damage related to soil saturation from flood events. Most flood damage is caused by water saturating materials susceptible to loss (i.e. wood, insulation, wallboard, fabric, furnishings, floor coverings, and appliances). In many cases, flood damage to homes renders them unlivable. Mobilehomes Statewide, the 1996 floods destroyed 156 housing units. Of those units, 61% were mobilehomes and trailers. Many older mobilehome parks are located in floodplain areas. Manufactured homes have a lower level of structural stability than stick -built homes, and must be anchored to provide additional structural stability during flood events. Because of confusion in the late 1980s resulting from multiple changes in NFIP regulations, there are some communities that do not actively enforce anchoring requirements. Lack of enforcement of manufactured home construction standards in floodplains can contribute to severe damages from flood events. Flooding - 12 According to the City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department, none of the City's Mobilehome Parks are located in the 100 -year floodplain. The safety of these parks and their compliance with land use planning and building codes, as well as FEMA NFIP requirements, warrants further investigation. Business/Industry Flood events impact businesses by damaging property and by interrupting business. Flood events can cut off customer access to a business as well as close a business for repairs. A quick response to the needs of businesses affected by flood events can help a community maintain economic vitality in the face of flood damage. Responses to business damages can include funding to assist owners in elevating or relocating flood -prone business structures. Public Infrastructure Publicly owned facilities are a key component of daily life for all citizens of the county. Damage to public water and sewer systems, transportation networks, flood control facilities, emergency facilities, and offices can hinder the ability of the government to deliver services. Government can take action to reduce risk to public infrastructure from flood events, as well as craft public policy that reduces risk to private property from flood events. Roads During natural hazard events, or any type of emergency or disaster, dependable road connections are critical for providing emergency services. Roads systems in the City of Hermosa Beach are maintained by multiple jurisdictions. Federal, state, county, and city governments all have a stake in protecting roads from flood damage. Road networks often traverse floodplain and floodway areas. Transportation agencies responsible for road maintenance are typically aware of roads at risk from flooding. Bridges There are no bridges within the City boundaries. Storm Water Systems Local drainage problems are not a significant problem. in Hermosa Beach. There is a Drainage Master Plan, and City staff is aware of local drainage threats. When a problem does arise, it is typically when storm water runoff enters culverts or goes underground into storm sewers. Inadequate maintenance can also contribute to the flood hazard in urban areas. Water/Wastewater Treatment Facilities There are xxx sanitary districts in the City of Hermosa Beach, and xx sewage�treatmen t facilities. There are also xxx water service companies and or districts in the City of Hermosa Beach QR The City of Hermosa Beach provides water to the resrdents.as part of city services. Water Quality Environmental quality problems include bacteria, toxins, and pollution. Flood Endnotes Flooding - 13 1. http://www.lalc.kl2.ca.us/target/units/river/tour/hist.html 2. Gumprecht, Blake, 1999, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. 3. Ibid 4. http://www.usc.edu/isd/archives/la/scandals/st_francis_dam.html 5. http://www.latimes.com/news/local/surroundings/la-me- surround 11 dec 11,0,1754871.story?coll=la-adelphia-right-rail 6. http://www.fema.gov/rrr/talkdiz/landslide.shtm#what Flooding - 14 Section 7: Tsunami Hazards in the City of Hermosa Beach Tsunamis - 1 Why Are Tsunamis a Threat to Southern California? History has shown that the probability of a tsunami in the planning area is an extremely low threat. However, if a tsunami should occur, the consequences would be great. The impact could cause loss of life, destroy thousands of high priced homes and greatly affect the City's downtown and coastal businesses, and have a profound impact on tourism. Even if all residents and visitors were safely evacuated, the damage to property in this densely populated, high property value area would still be tremendous. California's Tsunamis "Since 1812, the California coast has had 14 tsunamis with wave heights higher than three feet; six of these were destructive. The Channel Islands were hit by a significant tsunami in the early 1800s. The worst tsunami resulted from the 1964 Alaskan Earthquake and caused 12 deaths and at least $17 million in damages in Northern California."' What are Tsunamis? The phenomenon we call "tsunami" (soo-NAH-mee) is a series of traveling ocean waves of extremely long length generated primarily by earthquakes occurring below or near the ocean floor. Underwater volcanic eruptions and landslides can also generate tsunamis. In the deep ocean, the tsunami waves move across the deep ocean with a speed exceeding 500 miles per hour, and a wave height of only a few inches. Tsunami waves are distinguished from ordinary ocean waves by their great length between wave crests, often exceeding 60 miles or more in the deep ocean, and by the time between these crests, ranging from 10 minutes to an hour. As they reach the shallow waters of the coast, the waves slow down and the water can pile up into a wall of destruction up to 30 feet or more in height. The effect can be amplified where a bay, harbor or lagoon funnels the wave as it moves inland. Large tsunamis have been known to rise over 100 feet. Even a tsunami 1-3 feet high .can be very destructive and cause many deaths and injuries. Tsunamis typically are classified as either local or distant. Tsunamis from local sources usually result from earthquakes occurring off nearby coats. Tsunamis from distant sources are the most common type observed along the California Coast. Tsunamis generated by earthquakes in South America and the Aleutian -Alaskan region have posed a greater hazard to the West Coast of the United States than locally generated tsunamis. There is a history of Pacific -wide tsunamis occurring every 10 to 20 years. (Source: TyCom EIR, 9/2001). What causes Tsunami? There are many causes of tsunamis but the most prevalent is earthquakes. In addition, landslides, volcanic eruptions, explosions, and even the impact of cosmic bodies, such as meteorites, can generate tsunamis. Plate Tectonics Plate Tectonic Theory is based on an earth model characterized by a small number of Tsunamis - 2 lithospheric plates, 40 to 150 miles thick that float on a viscous under -layer called the asthenosphere. These plates, which cover the entire surface of the earth and contain both the continents and sea floor, move relative to each other at rates of up to several inches per year. The region where two plates come in contact is called a plate boundary, and the way in which one plate moves relative to another determines the type of boundary: spreading, where the two plates move away from each other; subduction, where the two plates move toward each other and one slides beneath the other; and transform, where the two plates slide horizontally past each other. Subduction zones are characterized by deep ocean trenches, and the volcanic islands or volcanic mountain chains associated with the many subduction zones around the Pacific Rim are sometimes called the Ring of Fire. Earthquakes and Tsunamis An earthquake can be caused by volcanic activity, but most are generated by movements along fault zones associated with the plate boundaries. Most strong earthquakes, representing 80% of the total energy released worldwide by earthquakes, occur in subduction zones where an oceanic plate slides under a continental plate or another younger oceanic plate. Not all earthquakes generate tsunamis. To generate a tsunami, the fault where the earthquake occurs must be underneath or near the ocean, and cause vertical movement of the sea floor over a large area, hundreds or thousands of square miles.. By far, the most destructive tsunamis are generated from large, shallow earthquakes with an epicenter or fault line near or on the ocean floor."2 The amount of vertical and horizontal motion of the sea floor, the area over which it occurs, the simultaneous occurrence of slumping of underwater sediments due to the shaking, and the efficiency with which energy is transferred from the earth's crust to the ocean water are all part of the tsunami generation mechanism. The sudden vertical displacements over such large areas, disturb the ocean's surface, displace water, and generate destructive tsunami waves.3 Although all oceanic regions of the world can experience tsunamis, the most destructive and repeated occurrences of tsunamis are in the Pacific Rim region. Tsunami Earthquakes The September 2, 1992 Earthquake (magnitude 7.2) was barely felt by residents along the coast of Nicaragua. Located well off -shore, the severity of shaking on a scale of Ito XII, was mostly II along the coast, and reached III at only a few places. Twenty to 70 minutes after the earthquake occurred, a tsunami struck the coast of Nicaragua with wave amplitudes up to 13 feet above normal sea level in most places and a maximum run-up height of 35 ft. The waves caught coastal residents by complete surprise and caused many casualties and considerable property damage. This tsunami was caused by a tsunami earthquake, an earthquake that produces an unusually large tsunami relative to the earthquake magnitude. Tsunami earthquakes are characterized by a very shallow focus, fault dislocations greater than several meters, and fault surfaces that are smaller than for a normal earthquake. Tsunamis - 3 Tsunami earthquakes are also slow earthquakes, with slippage along the fault beneath the sea floor occurring more slowly than it would in a normal earthquake. The only known method to quickly recognize a tsunami earthquake is to estimate a parameter called the seismic moment using very long period seismic waves (more than 50 seconds/cycle). Two other destructive and deadly tsunamis from tsunami earthquakes have occurred in recent years in Java, Indonesia (June 2, 1994) and Peru (February 21, 1996). "Less frequently, tsunami waves can be generated from displacements of water resulting from rock falls, icefalls and sudden submarine landslides or slumps. Such events may be caused impulsively from the instability and sudden failure of submarine slopes, which are sometimes triggered by the ground motions of a strong earthquake. For example in the 1980's, earth moving and construction work of an airport runway along the coast of Southern France, triggered an underwater landslide, which generated destructive tsunami waves in the harbor of Thebes."4 Tsunami Characteristics How Fast? Unnoticed tsunami waves can travel at the speed of a commercial jet plane, over 500 miles per hour. They can move from one side of the Pacific Ocean to the other in less than a day. This great speed makes it important to be aware of the tsunami as soon as it is generated. Scientists can predict when a tsunami will arrive at various places by knowing the source characteristics of the earthquake that generated the tsunami and the characteristics of the sea floor along the paths to those places. Tsunamis travel much slower in more shallow coastal waters where their wave heights begin to increase dramatically. How Big? Offshore and coastal features can determine the size and impact of tsunami waves. Reefs, bays, entrances to rivers, undersea features and the slope of the beach all help to modify the tsunami as it attacks the coastline. When the tsunami reaches the coast and moves inland, the water level can rise many feet. In extreme cases, water level has risen to more than 50 feet for tsunamis of distant origin and over 100 feet for tsunami waves generated near the earthquake's epicenter. The first wave may not be the largest in the series of waves. One coastal community may see no damaging wave activity while in another nearby community destructive waves can be large and violent. The flooding can extend inland by 1,000 feet or more, covering large expanses of land with water and debris. How Frequent? Since scientists cannot predict when earthquakes will occur, they cannot determine exactly when a tsunami will be generated. However, by looking at past historical tsunamis and run-up maps, scientists know where tsunamis are most likely to be generated. Past tsunami height measurements are useful in predicting future tsunami impact and flooding limits at specific coastal locations and communities. Tsunamis - 4 Types of Tsunamis Pacific -Wide and Regional Tsunamis Tsunamis can be categorized as "local" and Pacific -Wide. Typically, a Pacific -Wide tsunami is generated by major vertical ocean bottom movement in offshore deep trenches. A "local" tsunami can be a component of the Pacific -Wide tsunami in the area of the earthquake or a wave that is confined to the area of generation within a bay or harbor and caused by movement of the bay itself or landslides. On December 26, 2004 the second biggest earthquake in recorded history occurred off the coast of Indonesia. The 9.3 earthquake unleashed a devastating tsunami that travelled thousands of kilometres across the Indian Ocean, taking the lives of nearly 300,000 people in countries as far apart as Indonesia, the Maldives, Sri Lanka and Somalia. In 1960, a large tsunami caused widespread death and destruction throughout the Pacific was generated by an earthquake located off the coast of Chile. It caused loss of life and property damage not only along the Chile coast but also in Hawaii and as far away as Japan. The Great Alaskan Earthquake of 1964 killed 106 people and produced deadly tsunami waves in Alaska, Oregon and California. In July 1993, a tsunami generated in the Sea of Japan killed over 120 people in Japan. Damage also occurred in Korea and Russia but spared other countries since the tsunami wave energy was confined within the Sea of Japan. The 1993 Japan Sea tsunami is known as a "regional event" since its impact was confined to a relatively small area. For people living along the northwestern coast of Japan, the tsunami waves followed the earthquake within a few minutes. During the 1990's, destructive regional tsunamis also occurred in Nicaragua, Indonesia, the Philippines, Papua New Guinea, and Peru, killing thousands of people. Others caused property damage in Chile and Mexico. Some damage also occurred in the far field in the Marquesas Islands (French Polynesia) from the July 30, 1995, Chilean and February 21, 1996, Peruvian tsunamis. In less than a day, tsunamis can travel from one side of the Pacific to the other. However, people living near areas where large earthquakes occur may find that the tsunami waves will reach their shores within minutes of the earthquake. For these reasons, the tsunami threat to many areas such as Alaska, the Philippines, Japan and the United States West Coast can be immediate (for tsunamis from nearby earthquakes which take only a few minutes to reach coastal areas) or less urgent (for tsunamis from distant earthquakes which take from three to 22 hours to reach coastal areas). History of Regional Tsunamis Local The local tsunami may be the most serious threat as it strikes suddenly, sometimes before the earthquake shaking stops. Alaska has had six serious local tsunamis in the last 80 Tsunamis - 5 years and Japan has had many more. Local History of Tsunamis Tsunamis have been reported since ancient times. They have been documented extensively in California since 1806. Although the majority of tsunamis have occurred in Northern California, Southern California has been impacted as well. In the 1930's, four tsunamis struck the Los Angeles County, Orange County, and San Diego County coastal areas. In Orange County the tsunami wave reached heights of 20 feet or more above sea level. In 1964, following the Alaska Magnitude 8.2 Earthquake, tidal surges of approximately 4 feet to 5 feet hit the Huntington Harbor area causing moderate damage. Personal Interview Name: Bill Richardson Title: City of Huntington Beach Lifeguard Year: 1964 — Alaska Good Friday Earthquake and Tsunami (paraphrased by Glorria Morrison) I was on the lifeguard in the tower on the pier. We received warning by phone from the Fire Department who had received information from the National Weather Service. We were told to tell folks on the pier and beach that if the situation escalated they would be advised to evacuate the area and that they should be prepared to move quickly. I witnessed heavy tidal surges on the beaches. The tide changed in 10 minutes from what it normally was to a very different tide. Normally it takes six hours to change and in 10 minutes it sucked water out and when it came in, it went over the berm, 3/4 of the way across the beach. The accelerated tide within one hour came and went twice. The highs were extreme and the lows were extreme, very like our astronomical tides. I monitored the radio and heard of all the docks breaking loose in the harbor. The current was so strong and movement of water that the radio was being overwhelmed with calls for response. Only the two islands of Admiralty and Gilbert existed at the time. Bill Richardson referred me to Walt Snyder, a Lifeguard Lieutenant at the time. Walt was in Huntington Harbor during this event. Personal Interview Name: Walt Snyder Title: City of Huntington Beach City Lifeguard, Lt. in the Harbor Year: 1964 — Alaska Good Friday Earthquake and Tsunami (paraphrased by Glorria Morrison) I was called out at daybreak due to the tidal surges in the Huntington Harbor. I got in the City's only rescue boat. The tidal surges were huge and making whirlpools. They were moving at a much faster and higher rate than normal tide. When the surges would come in, they would tear the boats away from their moorings. Then when the surges would go out, they would take the boats through Tsunamis - 6 the bridge at Pacific Coast Highway to the Seal Beach (Anaheim Landing Bridge) and when they hit the pilings it would tear the boats apart. The high tides were carrying the boats into the weapons station. When surges retreated, the boats would end up on dry land at the weapons station --- high and dry and broken up. In 1964 there were only about 200-300 boats in the harbor and today Walt estimated there are 3,500 plus boats. There were only 300-400 homes then and now he estimates an excess of 5,000. This occurred during a low tide. The sea wall in Huntington Harbor is 9'. Had this occurred during a high tide, Walt stated the surges would have easily gone over the sea walls and damaged many homes. Table 7-1 Tsunami Events in California 1930-2004 Date Location Maximum Run up" (m) Earthquake Magnitude 08/31/1930 Redondo Beach 6.10 5.2 08/31/1930 Santa Monica 6.10 5.2 08/31/1930 Venice 6.10 5.2 03/11/1933 La Jolla 0.10 6.3 03/11/1933 Long Beach 0.10 6.3 08/21/1934 Newport Beach 12.00 Unknown 02/09/1941 San Diego Unknown 6.6 10/18/1989 Monterey 0.40 7.1 10/18/1989 Moss Landing 1.00 7.1 10/18/1989 Santa Cruz 0.10 7.1 04/25/1992 Arena Cove 0.10 7.1 04/25/1992 Monterey 0.10 7.1 09/01/1994 Crescent City 0.14 7.1 11/04/2000 Point Arguello 5.00 Source: Worldwide Tsunami Database www.ngdc.noaa.gov * Maximum Run up (M) -The maximum water height above sea level in meters. The run- up is the height the tsunami reached above a reference level such as mean sea level. It is not always clear which reference level was used. Tsunami Hazard Assessment Hazard Identification The tsunami threat to the City of Hermosa Beach is considered extremely low, although recent studies indicate a possibility that an off -shore landslide could generate a tsunami that could threaten the coastal community. Tsunamis - 7 Damage Factors of Tsunamis: Tsunamis cause damage in three ways: inundation, wave impact on structures, and erosion. "Strong, tsunami -induced currents lead to the erosion of foundations and the collapse of bridges and sea walls. Flotation and drag forces move houses and overturn railroad cars. Considerable damage is caused by the resultant floating debris, including boats and cars that become dangerous projectiles that may crash into buildings, break power lines, and may start fires. Fires from damaged ships in ports or from ruptured coastal oil storage tanks and refinery facilities can cause damage greater than that inflicted directly by the tsunami. Of increasing concern is the potential effect of tsunami draw down, when receding waters uncover cooling water intakes of nuclear power plants."5 Figure 7-1: Tsunami Formation Tsunamis - 8 A United States Government study reports that, "Local earthquakes will not generate a tsunami, in this area". Tsunamis are due to large off -shore earthquakes and ocean landslides. Dangerous tsunamis would most likely originate in the Aleutian and Chilean offshore submarine trenches. The City of Hermosa Beach has west-southwest facing beaches that are vulnerable to tsunamis or tidal surges from the south and from the west. Tsunami Watches and Warnings Warning System The tsunami warning system in the United States is a function of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National Weather Service. Development of the tsunami warning system was impelled by the disastrous waves generated in the 1964 Alaska Tsunami, which surprised Hawaii and the U.S. West Coast, taking a heavy toll in life and property. The disastrous 1964 tsunami resulted in the development of a regional warning system in Alaska. The Alaska Tsunami Warning Center is in Palmer, Alaska. This facility is the nerve center for an elaborate telemetry network of remote seismic stations in Alaska, Washington, California, Colorado, and other locations. Tidal data is also telemetered directly to the ATWC from eight Alaskan locations. Tidal data from Canada, Washington, Oregon, and California are available via telephone, teletype, and computer readout. Notification The National Warning System (NAWAS) is an integral part of the Alaska Tsunami Warning Center. Reports of major earthquakes occurring anywhere in the Pacific Basin that may generate seismic sea waves are transmitted to the Honolulu Observatory for evaluation. An Alaska Tsunami Warning Center is also in place for public notification of earthquakes in the Pacific Basin near Alaska, Canada, and Northern California. The Observatory Staff determines action to be taken and relays warnings over the NAWAS circuits to inform and warn West Coast states. The State NAWAS circuit is used to relay the information to the Orange County Operational Area warning center which will in turn relay the information to local warning points in coastal areas. The same information is also transmitted to local jurisdictions over appropriate radio systems, teletype, and telephone circuits to ensure maximum dissemination. Los Angeles County will use the Emergency Alert System (EAS) and Emergency News Network (EBB) to warn the public of an anticipated tsunami. A Tsunami Watch Bulletin is issued if an earthquake has occurred in the Pacific Basin and could cause a tsunami. A Tsunami Warning Bulletin is issued when an earthquake has occurred and a tsunami is spreading across the Pacific Ocean. When a threat no longer exists, a Cancellation Bulletin is issued. Tsunamis - 9 Vulnerability and Risk With an analysis of tsunami events depicted in the "Local History" section, we can deduce the common tsunami impact areas will include impacts on life, property, infrastructure and transportation. Community Tsunami Issues What is Susceptible to Tsunami? Life and Property Based on the "local" history events of tsunamis we can conclude that approximately 30% of the City could be significantly impacted. The largest impact on the community from a tsunami event is the loss of life and property damage to infrastructure. Known risk areas include, but are not limited to: • City and State Beaches • Structures west of Pacific Coast Highway • Vehicles and pedestrians west of Pacific Coast Highway Another significant factor is that during the summer months, the City's daytime population increases by as much as 50,000. That factor alone requires serious consideration of even a remote possibility of tsunamis in the region. Using the Tsunami Warning and Watch Bulletin would provide time to allow coastal residents and tourists to evacuate and seek higher ground for shelter. This would greatly reduce injuries and loss of life. Development Property along the coast could also be devastated. The City of Hermosa Beach coastal area is home to millions of dollars worth of residential and commercial structures. In addition, the area is scattered with infrastructure that serves the entire coastal region. A large tsunami could potentially destroy or damage hundreds of properties and spread debris for miles. A tsunami could have a catastrophic impact on the coastal area. During summer months up to 100,000 people a day come into the community. The local government relies heavily on tourism and sales tax. A tsunami event would impact businesses by damaging property and by interrupting business and services. Infrastructure Tsunamis (and earthquakes) can damage buildings, power lines, and other property and infrastructure due to flooding. Tsunamis can result in collapsed or damaged buildings or blocked roads and bridges, damaged traffic signals, streetlights, and parks, among others. Damage to public water and sewer systems, transportation networks, and flood channels would greatly impact daily life for residents. Roads blocked by objects during a tsunami may have severe consequences to people who Tsunamis - 10 are attempting to evacuate or who need emergency services. Emergency response operations can be complicated when roads are blocked or when power supplies are interrupted. Industry and commerce can suffer losses from interruptions in electric services and from extended road closures. They can also sustain direct losses to buildings, personnel, and other vital equipment. There are direct consequences to the local economy resulting from tsunamis related to both physical damages and interrupted services. Tsunami End Notes 1. http://education.sdsc.edu/optiputer/htmlLinks/california tsunami.html 2. http://www.prh.noaa.gov/itic/library/about tsu/fags.html#1 3. Ibid 4. Ibid 5. Ibid Tsunamis - 11 Section 8: Windstorm Hazards in the City of Hermosa Beach Windstorms — Pagel Why are Severe Windstorms a Threat to the City of Hermosa Beach? Severe wind storms pose a significant risk to life and property in the region by creating conditions that disrupt essential systems such as public utilities, telecommunications, and transportation routes. High winds can and do occasionally cause tornado-like damage to local homes and businesses. Severe windstorms can present a very destabilizing effect on the dry brush that covers local hillsides and urban wildland interface areas. High winds can have destructive impacts, especially to trees, power lines, and utility services. Figure 8-1: Santa Ana Winds Santa Ana Winds and Tornado -Like Wind Activity Based on local history, most incidents of high wind in the City of Hermosa Beach are the result of the Santa Ana wind conditions. While high impact wind incidents are not frequent in the area, significant Santa Ana Wind events and sporadic tornado activity have been known to negatively impact the local community. What are Santa Ana Winds? "Santa Ana winds are generally defined as warm, dry winds that blow from the east or northeast (offshore). These winds occur below the passes and canyons of the coastal ranges of Southern California and in the Los Angeles basin. Santa Ana winds often blow with exceptional speed in the Santa Ana Canyon (the canyon from which it derives its name). Forecasters at the National Weather Service offices in Oxnard and San Diego usually place speed minimums on these winds and reserve the use of "Santa Ana" for winds greater than 25 knots."1 These winds accelerate to speeds of 35 knots as they move through canyons and passes, with gusts to 50 or even 60 knots. "The complex topography of Southern California combined with various atmospheric conditions create numerous scenarios that may cause widespread or isolated Santa Ana Windstorms — 2 events. Commonly, Santa Ana winds develop when a region of high pressure builds over the Great Basin (the high plateau east of the Sierra Mountains and west of the Rocky Mountains including most of Nevada and Utah). Clockwise circulation around the center of this high pressure area forces air downslope from the high plateau. The air warms as it descends toward the California coast at the rate of 5 degrees F per 1000 feet due to compressional heating. Thus, compressional heating provides the primary source of warming. The air is dry since it originated in the desert, and it dries out even more as it is heated."2 These regional winds typically occur from October to March, and, according to most accounts are named either for the Santa Ana River Valley where they originate or for the Santa Ana Canyon, southeast of Los Angeles, where they pick up speed. What are Tornados? Tornadoes are spawned when there is warm, moist air near the ground, cool air aloft, and winds that speed up and change direction. An obstruction, such as a house, in the path of the wind causes it to change direction. This change increases pressure on parts of the house, and the combination of increased pressures and fluctuating wind speeds creates stresses that frequently cause structural failures. In order to measure the intensity and wind strength of a tornado, Dr. T. Theodore Fujita developed the Fujita Tornado Damage Scale. This scale compares the estimated wind velocity with the corresponding amount of suspected damage. The scale measures six classifications of tornadoes with increasing magnitude from an "FO" tornado to a "F6+" tornado. Table 8-1: Fujita Tornado Damage Scale Scale Wind Estimate (mph) Typical Damage FO < 73 Light damage. Some damage to chimneys and TV antennas; breaks twigs off trees; pushes over shallow -rooted trees. Fl 73-112 Moderate damage. Peels surface off roofs; windows broken; light trailer houses pushed or overturned; some trees uprooted of snapped; moving automobiles pushed off the road. 74 mph is the beginning of hurricane wind speed. F2 113-157 Considerable damage. Roofs torn off frame houses leaving strong upright walls; weak buildings in rural areas demolished; trailer houses destroyed; large trees snapped or uprooted; railroad boxcars pushed over; light object missiles generated; cars blown off highway. F3 158-206 Severe damage. Roofs and some walls torn off frame houses; some rural buildings completely demolished; trains overturned; steel -framed hangar - warehouse -type structures torn; cars lifted off the ground; most trees in a forest uprooted snapped, or leveled. F4 207-260 Devastating damage. Whole frame houses leveled, leaving piles of debris; steel structures badly damaged; trees debarked by small flying debris; cars and trains thrown some distances or rolled considerable distances; large Windstorms — Page3 Microbursts Microbursts are strong, damaging winds which strike the ground and often give the impression a tornado has struck. They frequently occur during intense thunderstorms. The origin of a microburst is downward moving air from a thunderstorm's core. But unlike a tornado, they affect only a rather small area. University of Chicago storm researcher Dr Ted Fujita first coined the term "downburst" to describe strong, downdraft winds flowing out of a thunderstorm cell that he believed were responsible for the crash of Eastern Airlines Flight 66 in June of 1975.3 A downburst is a straight -direction surface wind in excess of 39 mph caused by a small- scale, strong downdraft from the base of convective thundershowers and thunderstorms. In later investigations into the phenomena he defined two sub -categories of downbursts: the larger macrobursts and small microbursts.4 Macrobursts are downbursts with winds up to 117 mph which spread across a path greater than 2.5 miles wide at the surface and which last from 5 to 30 minutes. The microburst, on the other hand is confined to an even smaller area, less than 2.5 miles in diameter from the initial point of downdraft impact. An intense microburst can result in damaging winds near 270 km/hr (170 mph) and often last for less than five minutes.5 "Downbursts of all sizes descend from the upper regions of severe thunderstorms when the air accelerates downward through either exceptionally strong evaporative cooling or by very heavy rain which drags dry air down with it. When the rapidly descending air strikes .the ground, it spreads outward in all directions, like a fast -running faucet stream hitting the sink bottom. When the microburst wind hits an object on the ground such as a house, garage or tree, it can flatten the buildings and strip limbs and branches from the tree. After striking the ground, the powerful outward running gust can wreak further havoc along its path. Damage associated with a microburst is often mistaken for the work of a tornado, particularly directly under the microburst. However, damage patterns away from the impact area are characteristic of straight-line winds rather than the twisted pattern of tornado damage."6 Windstorms — Page 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 missiles generated. F5 261-318 Incredible damage. Whole frame houses tossed off foundations; steel - reinforced concrete structures badly damaged; automobile -sized missiles generated; trees debarked; incredible phenomena can occur. F6 -F12 319 to sonic Inconceivable damage. Should a tornado with the maximum wind speed in excess of F5 occur, the extent and types of damage may not be conceived. A number of missiles such as iceboxes, water heaters, storage tanks, automobiles, etc. will create serious secondary damage on structures. Source: http://weather.Iatimes.com/tornadoFAQ.asp Microbursts Microbursts are strong, damaging winds which strike the ground and often give the impression a tornado has struck. They frequently occur during intense thunderstorms. The origin of a microburst is downward moving air from a thunderstorm's core. But unlike a tornado, they affect only a rather small area. University of Chicago storm researcher Dr Ted Fujita first coined the term "downburst" to describe strong, downdraft winds flowing out of a thunderstorm cell that he believed were responsible for the crash of Eastern Airlines Flight 66 in June of 1975.3 A downburst is a straight -direction surface wind in excess of 39 mph caused by a small- scale, strong downdraft from the base of convective thundershowers and thunderstorms. In later investigations into the phenomena he defined two sub -categories of downbursts: the larger macrobursts and small microbursts.4 Macrobursts are downbursts with winds up to 117 mph which spread across a path greater than 2.5 miles wide at the surface and which last from 5 to 30 minutes. The microburst, on the other hand is confined to an even smaller area, less than 2.5 miles in diameter from the initial point of downdraft impact. An intense microburst can result in damaging winds near 270 km/hr (170 mph) and often last for less than five minutes.5 "Downbursts of all sizes descend from the upper regions of severe thunderstorms when the air accelerates downward through either exceptionally strong evaporative cooling or by very heavy rain which drags dry air down with it. When the rapidly descending air strikes .the ground, it spreads outward in all directions, like a fast -running faucet stream hitting the sink bottom. When the microburst wind hits an object on the ground such as a house, garage or tree, it can flatten the buildings and strip limbs and branches from the tree. After striking the ground, the powerful outward running gust can wreak further havoc along its path. Damage associated with a microburst is often mistaken for the work of a tornado, particularly directly under the microburst. However, damage patterns away from the impact area are characteristic of straight-line winds rather than the twisted pattern of tornado damage."6 Windstorms — Page 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tornados, like those that occur every year in the Midwest and Southeast parts of the United States, are a rare phenomenon in most of California, with most tornado-like activity coming from micro -bursts. Local History of Windstorm Events While the effects of Santa Ana Winds are often overlooked, it should be noted that in 2003, two deaths in Southern California were directly related to the fierce condition. A falling tree struck one woman in San Diego.' The second death occurred when a passenger in a vehicle was hit by a flying pickup truck cover launched by the Santa Ana Winds.8 Table 8-2: Santa Ana Wind Events during 2003 The following Santa Ana wind events were featured in news resources during 2003: January 6, 2003 OC Register "One of the strongest Santa Ana windstorms in a decade toppled 26 power poles in Orange early today, blew over a mobile derrick in Placentia, crushing two vehicles, and delayed Metrolink rail service." This windstorm also knocked out power to thousands of people in northeastern Orange County. January 8, 2003 CBSNEWS.com "Santa Ana's roared into Southern California late Sunday, blowing over trees, trucks and power poles. Thousands of people lost power." March 16, 2003 dailybulletin.com Fire Officials Brace for Santa Ana Winds - - "The forest is now so dry and so many trees have died that fires, during relatively calm conditions, are running as fast and as far as they might during Santa Ana Winds. Now the Santa Ana season is here. Combine the literally tinder dry conditions with humidity in the single digits and 60-80 mph winds, and fire officials shudder." Table 8-3: Major Windstorms in the Vicinity of the City of Hermosa Beach Date Location and Damage November 5-6, 1961 Santa Ana winds. Fire in Topanga Canyon February 10-11, 1973 Strong storm winds: 57 mph at Riverside, 46 Newport Beach. Some 200 trees uprooted in Pacific Beach alone October 26-27, 1993 Santa Ana winds. Fire in Laguna Hills October 14, 1997 Santa Ana winds: gusts 87 mph in central Orange County. Large fire in Orange County December 29, 1997 Gusts 60+ mph at Santa Ana March 28-29, 1998 Strong storm winds in Orange County: sustained 30-40 mph. Gust 70 mph at Newport Beach, gust 60 Huntington Beach. Trees down, power out, and damage across Orange and San Diego Counties. 1 illegal immigrant dead in Jamul. Windstorms — Page 5 September 2, 1998 Strong winds from thunderstorms in Orange County with gusts to 40mph. Large fires in Orange County December 6, 1998 Thunderstorm in Los Alamitos and Garden Grove: gust 50-60 mph called "almost a tornado" December 21-22, 1999 Santa Ana winds: gust 68 mph at Campo, 53 Huntington Beach, 44 Orange. House and tree damage in Hemet. March 5-6, 2000 Strong thunderstorm winds at the coast: gust 60 mph at Huntington Beach Property damage and trees downed along the coast . April 1, 2000 Santa Ana winds: gust 93 mph at Mission Viejo, 67 Anaheim Hills December 25-26, 2000 Santa Ana winds: gust 87 mph at Fremont Canyon. Damage and injuries in Mira Loma, Orange and Riverside Counties February 13, 2001 Thunderstorm gust to 89 mph in east Orange Source:http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/sandiego/research/Guide/weatherhistory.pdf The following is a glimpse of major tornado-like events to hit the City of Hermosa Beach, and surrounding areas: Table 8-4: Major Tornado-like Events in the Vicinity of Hermosa Beach Major Tornado-like Events in the Vicinity of Hermosa Beach 1958-2001 Date Location and Damage April 1, 1958 Tornado: Laguna Beach February 19, 1962 Tornado: Irvine April 8, 1965 Tornado: Costa Mesa November 7, 1966 Newport Beach and Costa Mesa: Property Damage March 16, 1977 Tornado skipped from Fullerton to Brea Damage to 80 homes and injured four people February 9, 1978 Tornado: Irvine. Property damage and 6 injured January 31, 1979 Tornado Santa Ana Numerous power outages November 9, 1982 Tornadoes in Garden Grove and Mission Viejo. Property damage January 13, 1984 Tornado: Huntington Beach. Property damage March 16, 1986 Tornado: Anaheim. Property damage February 22-24, 1987 Tornadoes and waterspouts: Huntington Beach January 18, 1988 Tornadoes: Mission Viejo and San Clemente. Property damage February 28, 1991 Tornado: Tustin March 27, 1991 Tornado: Huntington Beach December 7, 1992 Tornadoes: Anaheim and Westminster Property damage January 18, 1993 Tornado: Orange County Property damage Windstorms — Page 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 February 8, 1993 Tornado: Brea. Property damage February 7, 1994 Tornado from Newport Beach to Tustin. Roof and window damage. Trees were also knocked down December 13, 1994 Two waterspouts about 0.5 mile off Newport Beach December 13, 1995 Funnel cloud near Fullerton Airport March 13, 1996 Funnel cloud in Irvine November 10-11, 1997 Waterspout came ashore at Newport Pier on the 10th and dissipated over western Costa Mesa. Tornadoes in Irvine on the 11th and a funnel cloud developed. 10th: Winds estimated at 60-70 mph. 11th: Minor power outages occurred with little property damage. A fisherman was blown from one end of Newport Pier to the other. Property and vehicle damage in Irvine from flying debris. Ten cars were thrown a few feet. December 21, 1997 Waterspout and tornado in Huntington Beach. Damage to boats, houses, and city property February 24, 1998 Tornado in Huntington Beach. Property damage with a power outage, roof flew' mile March 13-14, 1998 Numerous waterspouts between Long Beach, Huntington Beach, and Catalina March 31 -April 1, 1998 Numerous funnel clouds reported off Orange County coastline, two of which became waterspouts off Orange County. One waterspout briefly hit the coast off the Huntington Beach pier. June 6, 1998 Two funnel clouds off Dana Point December 31, 1998 Funnel clouds in Santa Ana. Waterspout off Costa Mesa coast February 21, 2000 Tornado: Anaheim Hills. Property damage October 28, 2000 Funnel clouds around Newport Beach and Costa Mesa January 10, 2001 Funnel cloud at Orange County airport and Newport Beach February 24, 2001 Tornado in Orange. Damage to warehouse, 6 structures, fences, and telephone wires. Source: http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/sandiego/research/Guide/weatherhistory.pdf Windstorm Hazard Assessment Hazard Identification A windstorm event in the region can range from short term microburst activity lasting only minutes to a long duration Santa Ana wind condition that can last for several days as in the case of the January 2003 Santa Ana wind event. Windstorms in the City of Hermosa Beach area can cause extensive damage including heavy tree stands, exposed coastal properties, road and highway infrastructure, and critical utility facilities. Heavy tourist traffic on the State Beach property is at great risk during windstorm activity. The map shows clearly the direction of the Santa Ana winds as they travel from the stable, high-pressure weather system called the Great Basin High through the canyons Windstorms — Page 7 and towards the low-pressure system off the Pacific. Clearly the area of the City of Hermosa Beach is in the direct path of the ocean -bound Santa Ana winds. Vulnerability and Risk With an analysis of the high wind and tornado events depicted in the "Local History" section, we can deduce the common windstorm impact areas including impacts on life, property, utilities, infrastructure and transportation. Additionally, if a windstorm disrupts power to local residential communities, the American Red Cross and City resources might be called upon for care and shelter duties. Displacing residents and utilizing City resources for shelter staffing and disaster cleanup can cause an economic hardship on the community. Community Windstorm Issues What is Susceptible to Windstorms? Life and Property Based on the history of the region, windstorm events can be expected, perhaps annually, across widespread areas of the region which can be adversely impacted during a windstorm event. This can result in the involvement of City of Hermosa Beach emergency response personnel during a wide-ranging windstorm or microburst tornadic activity. Both residential and commercial structures with weak reinforcement are susceptible to damage. Wind pressure can create a direct and frontal assault on a structure, pushing walls, doors, and windows inward. Conversely, passing currents can create lift suction forces that pull building components and surfaces outward. With extreme wind forces, the roof or entire building can fail causing considerable damage. Debris carried along by extreme winds can directly contribute to loss of life and indirectly to the failure of protective building envelopes, siding, or walls. When severe windstorms strike a community, downed trees, power lines, and damaged property can be major hindrances to emergency response and disaster recovery. The Beaufort Scale below, coined and developed by Sir Francis Beaufort in 1805, illustrates the effect that varying wind speed can have on sea swells and structures: Table 8-5: Beaufort Scale BEAUFORT SCALE Beaufort Force Speed (mph) Wind Description - State of Sea - Effects on Land 0 Less 1 Calm - Mirror-like - Smoke rises vertically 1 1-3 Light - Air Ripples look like scales; No crests of foam - Smoke drift shows direction of wind, but wind vanes do not Windstorms — Page 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4-7 Light Breeze - Small but pronounced wavelets; Crests do not break - Wind vanes move; Leaves rustle; You can feel wind on the face 3 8-12 Gentle Breeze - Large Wavelets; Crests break; Glassy foam; A few whitecaps - Leaves and small twigs move constantly; Small, light flags are extended 4 13-18 Moderate Breeze - Longer waves; Whitecaps - Wind lifts dust and loose paper; Small branches move 5 19-24 Fresh Breeze - Moderate, long waves; Many whitecaps; Some spray - Small trees with leaves begin to move 6 25-31 Strong Breeze - Some large waves; Crests of white foam; Spray - Large branches move; Telegraph wires whistle; Hard to hold umbrellas 7 32-38 Near Gale - White foam from breaking waves blows in streaks with the wind - Whole trees move; Resistance felt walking into wind 8 39-46 Gale - Waves high and moderately long; Crests break into spin drift, blowing foam in well marked streaks - Twigs and small branches break off trees; Difficult to walk 9 47-54 Strong Gale - High waves with wave crests that tumble; Dense streaks of foam in wind; Poor visibility from spray - Slight structural damage 10 55-63 Storm - Very high waves with long, curling crests; Sea surface appears white from blowing foam; Heavy tumbling of sea; Poor visibility - Trees broken or uprooted; Considerable structural damage 11 64-73 Violent Storm - Waves high enough to hide small and medium sized ships; Sea covered with patches of white foam; Edges of wave crests blown into froth; Poor visibility - Seldom experienced inland; Considerable structural damage 12 >74 Hurricane - Sea white with spray. Foam and spray render visibility almost non-existent - Widespread damage. Very rarely experienced on land. Source: http://www.compuweather.com/decoder-charts.html Disruption of Critical Services Critical facilities include police stations, fire stations, hospitals, shelters, and other facilities that provide important services to the community. These facilities and their services need to be functional after an earthquake event. Utilities Historically, falling trees have been the major cause of power outages in the region. Windstorms such as strong microbursts and Santa Ana Wind conditions can cause flying debris and downed utility lines. For example, tree limbs breaking in winds of only 45 mph can be thrown over 75 feet. As such, overhead power lines can be damaged even in relatively minor windstorm events. Falling trees can bring electric power lines down to the pavement, creating the possibility of lethal electric shock. Rising population growth Windstorms — Page 9 and new infrastructure in the region creates a higher probability for damage to occur from windstorms as more life and property are exposed to risk. Infrastructure Windstorms can damage buildings, power lines, and other property and infrastructure due to falling trees and branches. During wet winters, saturated soils cause trees to become less stable and more vulnerable to uprooting from high winds. Windstorms can result in collapsed or damaged buildings or blocked roads and bridges, damaged traffic signals, streetlights, and parks, among others. Roads blocked by fallen trees during a windstorm may have severe consequences to people who need access to emergency services. Emergency response operations can be complicated when roads are blocked or when power supplies are interrupted. Industry and commerce can suffer losses from interruptions in electric services and from extended road closures. They can also sustain direct losses to buildings, personnel, and other vital equipment. There are direct consequences to the local economy resulting from windstorms related to both physical damages and interrupted services. Increased Fire Threat Perhaps the greatest danger from windstorm activity in Southern California comes from the combination of the Santa Ana winds with the major fires that occur every few years in the urban/wildland interface. With the Santa Ana winds driving the flames, the speed and reach of the flames is even greater than in times of calm wind conditions. The higher fire hazard raised by a Santa Ana wind condition requires that even more care and attention be paid to proper brush clearances on property in the wildland/urban interface areas. Transportation Windstorm activity can have an impact on local transportation in addition to the problems caused by downed trees and electrical wires blocking streets and highways. During periods of extremely strong Santa Ana winds, major highways can be temporarily closed to truck and recreational vehicle traffic. However, typically these disruptions are not long lasting, nor do they carry a severe long term economic impact on the region. Credits: Special Thanks to Jacob Green, Assistant to the Emergency Services Coordinator, City of Fountain Valley/Huntington Beach Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee End Notes: lhttp://nimbo.wrh.noaa.gov/Sandiego/snawind.html 21bid 3Keith C. Heidorn at http://www.suite101.com/article.cfin/13646/100918, June 1, 2003 Windstorms — Page 10 4Ibid 5lbid 6Ibid 7www.cbsnews.com, January 8, 2003 8www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/01/06/nationaU Windstorms — Page 11 Appendix A: Master Resource Directory The Resource Directory provides contact information for local, regional, state, and federal programs that are currently involved in hazard mitigation activities. The Hazard Mitigation Committee may look to the organizations on the following pages for resources and technical assistance. The Resource Directory provides a foundation for potential partners in action item implementation. The Hazard Mitigation Committee will continue to add contact information for organizations currently engaged in hazard mitigation activities. This section may also be used by various community members interested in hazard mitigation information and projects. American Public Works Association Level: National Hazard: Multi http://www.apwa.net 2345 Grand Boulevard Suite 500 Kansas City, MO 64108-2641 I Ph: 816-472-6100 ! Fx: 816-472-1610 Notes: The American Public Works Association is an international educational and professional association of public agencies, private sector companies, and individuals dedicated to providing high quality public works goods and services. Association of State Floodplain Managers Level: Federal 2809 Fish Hatchery Road j Hazard: Flood www.floods.org Madison, WI 53713 I Ph: 608-274-0123 I Fx: Notes: The Association of State Floodplain Managers is an organization of professionals involved in floodplain management, flood hazard mitigation, the National Flood Insurance Program, and flood preparedness, warning and recovery Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) Level: National Hazard: Earthquake www.bssconline.org 1090 Vermont Ave., NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20005 Ph: 202-289-7800 Fx: 202-289-109 Notes: The Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) develops and promotes building earthquake risk mitigation regulatory provisions for the nation. Appendix A - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Level: State Hazard: Multi http://www.dot.ca.gov/ 120 S. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Ph: 213-897-3656 Fx: Notes: Caltrans is responsible for the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of the California State Highway System, as well as that portion of the Interstate Highway System within the state's boundaries. Alone and in partnership with Amtrak, Caltrans is also involved in the support of intercity passenger rail service in California. California Resources Agency Level: State Hazard: Multi http://resources.ca.gov/ 1416 Ninth Street Suite 1311 Sacramento, CA 95814 Ph: 916-653-5656 Fx: Notes: The California Resources Agency restores, protects and manages the state's natural, historical and cultural resources for current and future generations using solutions based on science, collaboration and respect for all the communities and interests involved. California Division of Forestry (CDF) Level: State Hazard: Multi http://www.fire.ca.gov/php/index.php• 210 W. San Jacinto Perris CA 92570 Ph: 909-940-6900 Fx: Notes: The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection protects over 31 million acres of California's privately -owned wildlands. CDF emphasizes the management and protection of California's natural resources. California Division of Mines and Geology (DMG) Level: State Hazard: Multi www.consrv.ca.gov/cgs/index.htm 801 K Street MS 12-30 Sacramento, CA 95814 Ph: 916-445-1825 Fx: 916-445-5718 Notes: The California Geological Survey develops and disseminates technical information and advice on California's geology, geologic hazards, and mineral resources. California Environmental Resources Evaluation System (CERES) Level: State I Hazard: Multi http://ceres.ca.gov/ 900 N St. Suite 250 Sacramento, Ca. 95814 Ph: 916-653-2238 Fx: Notes: CERES is an excellent website for access to environmental information and websites. Appendix A - 2 California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Level: State Hazard: Flood http://wwwdwr.water.ca.gov 1416 9th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Ph: 916-653-6192 Fx: Notes: The Department of Water Resources manages the water resources of California in cooperation with other agencies, to benefit the State's people, and to protect, restore, and enhance the natural and human environments. California Department of Conservation: Southern California Regional Office Level: State LHazard: Multi www.consrv.ca.gov #700 655 S. Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90017-2321 Ph: 213-239-0878 Fx: 213-239-0984 Notes: The Department of Conservation provides services and information that promote environmental health, economic vitality, informed land -use decisions and sound management of our state's natural resources. California Planning Information Network Level: State Hazard: Multi www.calpin.ca.gov Ph: Fx: Notes: The Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) publishes basic information on local planning agencies, known as the California Planners' Book of Lists. This local planning information is available on-line with new search capabilities and up -to -the- minute updates. EPA, Region 9 1 Level: Regional Hazard: Multi http://www.epa.gov/region09 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Ph: 415-947-8000 Fx: 415-947-3553 Notes: The mission of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is to protect human health and to safeguard the natural environment through the themes of air and global climate change, water, land, communities and ecosystems, and compliance and environmental stewardship. Appendix A - 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region IX Level: Federal i Hazard: Multi T www.fema.gov 1111 Broadway Suite 1200 Oakland, CA 94607 Ph: 510-627-7100 Fx: 510-627-7112 Notes: The Federal Emergency Management Agency is tasked with responding to, planning for, recovering from and mitigating against disasters. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Division Level: Federal Hazard: Multi www.fema.gov/fimalplanhowto.shtm 500 C Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20472 Ph: 202-566-1600 Fx: Notes: The Mitigation Division manages the National Flood Insurance Program and oversees FEMA's mitigation programs. It has of a number of programs and activities of which provide citizens Protection, with flood insurance; Prevention, with mitigation measures and Partnerships, with communities throughout the country. Floodplain Management Association Level: Federal 1 Hazard: Flood www.floodplain.org P.O. Box 50891 Sparks, NV 89435-0891 Ph: 775-626-6389 Fx: 775-626-6389 Notes: The Floodplain Management Association is a nonprofit educational association. It was established in 1990 to promote the reduction of flood losses and to encourage the protection and enhancement of natural floodplain values. Members include representatives of federal, state and local government agencies as well as private firms. Gateway Cities Partnership Level: Regional Hazard: Multi www.gatewaycities.org 7300 Alondra Boulevard Suite 202 Paramount, CA 90723 Ph: 562-817-0820 Fx: Notes: Gateway Cities Partnership is a 501 C 3 non-profit Community Development Corporation for the Gateway Cities region of southeast LA County. The region comprises 27 cities that roughly speaking extends from Montebello on the north to Long Beach on the South, the Alameda Corridor on the west to the Orange County line on the east. Appendix A - 4 Governor's Office of Emergency Services (OES) Level: State 1 Hazard: Multi www.oes.ca.gov P.O. Box 419047 Rancho Cordova, CA 95741-9047 Ph: 916 845- 8911 Fx: 916 845- 8910 Notes: The Governor's Office of Emergency Services coordinates overall state agency response to major disasters in support of local government. The office is responsible for assuring the state's readiness to respond to and recover from natural, manmade, and war- caused emergencies, and for assisting local governments in their emergency preparedness, response and recovery efforts. Greater Antelope Valley Economic Alliance Level: Regional 1 Hazard: Multi 42060 N. Tenth Street West Lancaster, CA 93534 Ph: 661-945-2741 Fx: 661-945-7711 Notes: The Greater Antelope Valley Economic Alliance, (GA VEA) is a 501 (c)(6) nonprofit organization with a 501(c)(3) affiliated organization the Antelope Valley Economic Research and Education Foundation. GA VEA is a public-private partnership of business, local governments, education, non-profit organizations and health care organizations that was founded in 1999 with the goal of attracting good paying jobs to the Antelope Valley in order to build a sustainable economy. Landslide Hazards Program, USGS Level: Federal Hazard: Landslide http://landslides.usgs.gov/index.html 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive MS 906 Reston, VA 20192 Ph: 703-648- 4000 Fx: Notes: The NLIC website provides good information on the programs and resources regarding landslides. The page includes information on the National Landslide Hazards Program Information Center, a bibliography, publications, and current projects. USGS scientists are working to reduce long-term losses and casualties from landslide hazards through better understanding of the causes and mechanisms of ground failure both nationally and worldwide. Appendix A - 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation Level: Regional Hazard: Multi www.laedc.org 444 S. Flower Street 34th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Ph: 213-236-4813 Fx: 213- 623-0281 Notes: The LAEDC is a private, non-profit 501 (c) 3 organization established in 1981 with the mission to attract, retain and grow businesses and jobs in the Los Angeles region. The LAEDC is widely relied upon for its Southern California Economic Forecasts and Industry Trend Reports. Lead by the renowned Jack Kyser (Sr. Vice President, Chief Economist) his team of researchers produces numerous publications to help business, media and government navigate the LA region's diverse economy. Los Angeles County Public Works Department Level: County Hazard: Multi http://ladpw.org 900 S. Fremont Ave. - Alhambra, CA 91803 Ph: 626-458-5100 Fx: Notes: The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works protects property and promotes public safety through Flood Control, Water Conservation, Road Maintenance, Bridges, Buses and Bicycle Trails, Building and Safety, Land Development, Waterworks, Sewers, Engineering, Capital Projects and Airports National Wildland/Urban Interface Fire Program Level: Federal Hazard: Wildfire www.firewise.org/ 1 Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA 02169-7471 Ph: 617-770-3000 Fx: 617 770-0700 Notes: Firewise maintains a Website designed for people who live in wildfire- prone areas, but it also can be of use to local planners and decision makers. The site offers online wildfire protection information and checklists, as well as listings of other publications, videos, and conferences. National Resources Conservation Service Level: Federal Hazard: Multi http://www.nres.usda.gov/ 14th and Independence Ave., SW Room 5105-A Washington, DC 20250 Ph: 202-720-7246 Fx: 202-720-7690 Notes: NRCS assists owners of America's private land with conserving their soil, water, and other natural resources, by delivering technical assistance based on sound science and suited to a customer's specific needs. Cost shares and financial incentives are available in some cases. Appendix A - 6 National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) Level: Federal Hazard: Wildfire www.nifc.gov 3833 S. Development Ave. Boise, Idaho 83705-5354 Ph: 208-387- 5512 Fx: Notes: The NIFC in Boise, Idaho is the nation's support center for wildland firefighting. Seven federal agencies work together to coordinate and support wildland fire and disaster operations. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Level: National Hazard: Wildfire http://www.nfpa.org/catalog/home/index.asp 1 Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA 02169-7471 I Ph: 617-770-3000 Fx: 617 770-0700 Notes: The mission of the international nonprofit NFPA is to reduce the worldwide burden of fire and other hazards on the quality of life by providing and advocating scientifically-based consensus codes and standards, research, training and education National Floodplain Insurance Program (NFIP) Level: Federal Hazard: Flood www.fema.gov/nfip/ 500 C Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20472 Ph: 202-566-1600 Fx: Notes: The Mitigation Division manages the National Flood Insurance Program and oversees FEMA's mitigation programs. It has of a number of programs and activities of which provide citizens Protection, with flood insurance; Prevention, with mitigation measures and Partnerships, with communities throughout the country. National Oceanic /Atmospheric Administration Level: Federal Hazard: Multi www.noaa.gov 14th Street & Constitution Ave NW Rm 6013 Washington, DC 20230 Ph: 202-482-6090 Fx: 202-482-3154 Notes: NOAA's historical role has been to predict environmental changes, protect life and property, provide decision makers with reliable scientific information, and foster global environmental stewardship. Appendix A - 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 National Weather Service, Office of Hydrologic Development Level: Federal Hazard: Flood http://www.nws.noaa.gov/ 1325 East West Highway SSMC2 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Ph: 301-713-1658 Fx: 301-713-0963 Notes: The Office of Hydrologic Development (OHD) enhances National Weather Service products by: infusing new hydrologic science, developing hydrologic techniques for operational use, managing hydrologic development by NWS field office, providing advanced hydrologic products to meet needs identified by NWS customers National Weather Service Level: Federal Hazard: Multi http://www.nws.noaa.gov/ 520 North Elevar Street Oxnard, CA 93030 Ph: 805-988- 6615 Fx: Notes: The National Weather Service is responsible for providing weather service to the nation. It is charged with the responsibility of observing and reporting the weather and with issuing forecasts and warnings of weather and floods in the interest of national safety and economy. Briefly, the priorities for service to the nation are: 1. protection of life, 2. protection of property, and 3. promotion of the nation's welfare and economy. San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership Level: Regional Hazard: Multi www.valleynet.org 4900 Rivergrade Road Suite A310 Irwindale, CA 91706 Ph: 626-856-3400 Fx: 626-856-5115 Notes: The San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership is a non-profit corporation representing both public and private sectors. The Partnership is the exclusive source for San Gabriel Valley - specific information, expertise, consulting, products, services, and events. It is the single organization in the Valley with the mission to sustain and build the regional economy for the mutual benefit of all thirty cities, chambers of commerce, academic institutions, businesses and residents. Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Level: County Hazard: Flood http://www.lacsd.ora/ 1955 Workman Mill Road Whittier, CA 90607 Ph:562-699-7411 x2301 Fx: Notes: The Sanitation Districts provide wastewater and solid waste management.for over half the population of Los Angeles County and turn waste products into resources such as reclaimed water, energy, and recyclable materials. Appendix A - 8 Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Level: Regional , Hazard: Multi http://smmc.ca.gov/ 570 West Avenue Twenty -Six Suite 100 Los Angeles, CA 90065 Ph: 323-221-8900 Fx: Notes: The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy helps to preserve over 55,000 acres of parkland in both wilderness and urban settings, and has improved more than 114 public recreational facilities throughout Southern California. South Bay Economic Development Partnership Level: Regional Hazard: Multi www.southbaypartnership.com 3858 Carson Street Suite 110 Torrance, CA 90503 Ph: 310-792-0323 Fx: 310-543-9886 Notes: The South Bay Economic Development Partnership is a collaboration of business, labor, education and government. Its primary goal is to plan an implement an economic development and marketing strategy designed to retain and create jobs and stimulate economic growth in the South Bay of Los Angeles County. South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Level: Regional Hazard: Multi www.aqmd.gov 21865 E. Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Ph: 800 -CUT -SMOG Fx: Notes: AQMD is a regional government agency that seeks to achieve and maintain healthful air quality through a comprehensive program of research, regulations, enforcement, and communication. The AQMD covers Los Angeles and Orange Counties and parts of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) Level: Regional Hazard: Earthquake www.scec.org 3651 Trousdale Parkway Suite 169 Los Angeles, CA 90089-0742 Ph: 213-740-5843 Fx: 213/740-0011 Notes: The Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) gathers new information about earthquakes in Southern California, integrates this information into a comprehensive and predictive understanding of earthquake phenomena, and communicates this understanding to end-users and the general public in order to increase earthquake awareness, reduce economic losses, and save lives. Appendix A - 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Level: Regional Hazard: Multi www.scag.ca.gov 818 W. Seventh Street 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Ph: 213-236-1800 Fx: 213-236-1825 Notes: The Southern California Association of Governments functions as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for six counties: Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura and Imperial. As the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization, the Association of Governments is mandated by the federal government to research and draw up plans for transportation, growth management, hazardous waste management, and air quality. State Fire Marshal (SFM) Level: State I Hazard: Wildfire http://osfm.fire.ca.gov 1131 "S" Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Ph: 916-445-8200 Fx: 916-445-8509 Notes: The Office of the State Fire Marshal (SFM) supports the mission of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) by focusing on fire prevention. SFM regulates buildings in which people live, controls substances which may, cause injuries, death and destruction by fire; provides statewide direction for fire prevention within wildland areas; regulates hazardous liquid pipelines; reviews regulations and building standards; and trains and educates in fire protection methods and responsibilities. The Community Rating System (CRS) Level: Federal Hazard: Flood http://www.fema.gov/nfip/crs.shtm 500 C Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20472 Ph: 202-566-1600 Fx: Notes: The Community Rating System (CRS) recognizes community floodplain management efforts that go beyond the minimum requirements of the NFIP. Property owners within the County would receive reduced NFIP flood insurance premiums if the County implements floodplain management practices that qualify it for a CRS rating. For further information on the CRS, visit FEMA's website. United States Geological Survey Level: Federal Hazard: Multi http://www.usgs.gov/ 345 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Ph: 650-853-8300 Fx: Notes: The USGS provides reliable scientific information to describe and understand the Earth; minimize loss of life and property from natural disasters; manage water, biological, energy, and mineral resources; and enhance and protect our quality of life. Appendix A - 10 US Army Corps of Engineers Level: Federal Hazard: Multi http://www.usace.army.mi1 P.O. Box 532711 Los Angeles CA 90053- 2325 Ph: 213-452- 3921 Fx: Notes: The United States Army Corps of Engineers work in engineering and environmental matters. A workforce of biologists, engineers, geologists, hydrologists, natural resource managers and other professionals provide engineering services to the nation including planning, designing, building and operating water resources and other civil works projects. USDA Forest Service Level: Federal Hazard: Wildfire http://www.fs.fed.us 1400 Independence Ave. SW Washington, D.C. 20250-0002 Ph: 202-205-8333 Fx: Notes: The Forest Service is an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The Forest Service manages public lands in national forests and grasslands. USGS Water Resources Level: Federal Hazard: Multi www.water.usgs.gov 6000 J Street Placer Hall Sacramento, CA 95819-6129 Ph: 916-278-3000 Fx: 916-278-3070 Notes: The USGS Water Resources mission is to provide water information that benefits the Nation's citizens: publications, data, maps, and applications software. Western States Seismic Policy Council (WSSPC) Level: Regional Hazard: Earthquake www.wsspc.org/home.html 125 California Avenue Suite D201, #1 Palo Alto, CA 94306 Ph: 650-330-1101 Fx: 650-326-1769 Notes: WSSPC is a regional earthquake consortium funded mainly by FEMA. Its website is a great resource, with information clearly categorized - from policy to engineering to education. Appendix A - 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Westside Economic Collaborative C/O Pacific Western Bank Level: Regional Hazard: Multi http://www.westside-Ia.or 120 Wilshire Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90401 Ph: 310-458-1521 Fx: 310-458-6479 Notes: The Westside Economic Development Collaborative is the first Westside regional economic development corporation. The Westside EDC functions as an information gatherer and resource center, as well as a forum, through bringing business, government, and residents together to address issues affecting the region: Economic Diversity, Transportation, Housing, Workforce Training and Retraining, Lifelong Learning, Tourism, and Embracing Diversity. Appendix A - 12 Appendix B: Public Participation Public participation is a key component to any strategic planning process. It is very important that such broad -reaching plans not be written in isolation. Agency participation offers an opportunity for impacted departments and organizations to provide expertise and insight into the planning process. Citizen participation offers citizens the chance to voice their ideas, interests, and opinions. The Federal Emergency Management Agency also requires public input during the development of mitigation plans. The City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan integrates a cross-section of public input throughout the planning process. To accomplish this goal, the City of Hermosa Beach Hazard Mitigation Planning Team developed a public participation process through five components: 1) developing a Planning Team comprised of knowledgeable individuals representative of the City and the Office of Disaster Management; 2) conducted a survey of "Levels of Concerns" to verify the primary concerns of citizens and business owners as relates to natural hazards; 3) solicited.the assistance of local media representatives and community newsletters to announce the progress of the planning activities and to announce the availability of the Draft Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan; 4) created opportunities for the citizens and public agencies to review the Draft Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan; 5) Plan was presented during a City Council meeting where the public had an opportunity to express their views concerning the Draft Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. Integrating public participation during the development of the City of Hermosa Beach Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan has ultimately resulted in increased public awareness. Through public involvement, the mitigation plan reflects community issues, concerns, and new ideas and perspectives on mitigation opportunities and plan action items. Planning Team Creation of the Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan was the responsibility of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team, which consisted of representatives from various city departments and the Office of Disaster Management. The Planning Team guided the development of the plan, and assisted in developing plan goals and action items, identifying stakeholders and plan reviewers, and sharing local expertise to create a more comprehensive plan. The Planning Team will be renamed the Natural Hazards Mitigation Committee and will be responsible for implementing the Mitigation Plan. Planning Team Meetings In the Fall of 2004, the City's Assistant Fire Chief and Fire Department Administrative Assistant attended a training sponsored by DMAC on the subject of Preparing Hazard Mitigation Plans. Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Meetings Pre -Training: Hazard Analysis (Meeting #1): November 23, 2004 Emergency Planning Consultants delivered one-hour of training to the Planning Team. Appendix B - 1 The pre -training consisted of the history of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, the purpose and role of hazard mitigation, and the planhing process. Kick -Off Meeting (Meeting #2): November 23, 2004 Emergency Planning Consultants facilitated a Workshop where participants had an opportunity to learn about various natural hazards, assess and rank the local threats, examine hazard maps, and complete the FEMA Worksheets contained in FEMA 386-2 Understanding Your Risks. Part of the discussion included a presentation by EPC of historical disaster events across the country. Those slides served as a backdrop for discussing potential mitigation activities. There was an extensive discussion on various methods of engaging the public in the mitigation process. The Planning Team prepared a draft media release and discussed a public opinion survey provided by EPC. The Team agreed that the survey will be distributed at numerous City facilities. Pre -Training: Mitigation (Meeting #3): January 11, 2005 EPC presented pre -training on the concepts and issues associated with hazard mitigation. Developing Mitigation Goals & Actions I (Meeting #4): January 11, 2005 The Planning Team reviewed the Hazard Analysis draft presented by Emergency Planning Consultants. Once questions were answered on the Hazard Analysis, the focus of the Workshop moved to goal development. EPC presented the jurisdictions with lists of sample mitigation actions gathered from dozens of adopted Hazard Mitigation Plans representing regions across the country. Using information from the public process, previous Team meetings, and the sample actions, each jurisdiction began developing action items for multi -hazards and specific hazards. Each of the action items identified a task, assigned agency, timeline, and associated goal. Once the action items were completed, the actions were prioritized by the Planning Team. At the conclusion of the Workshop, the jurisdictions discussed the upcoming plan review process. Considerable attention was given to identifying the appropriate plan reviewers and the importance of incorporating the public input gained through the review process. Developing Mitigation Goals & Actions II (Meeting #5): January 27, 2005 The Planning Team continued in the process of developing mitigation action items. Draft Review (Meeting #6): April 12, 2005 The Planning Team reviewed the Draft Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan and provided the consultant with recommendations and revisions. Benefit/Cost Issues Throughout the planning process, the consultant reminded the Planning Team of the importance of considering Benefit/Cost issues including: social issues, political realities, Appendix B - 2 economic benefits, and environmental concerns. During Meeting #4, the consultant introduced the Planning Team to the STAPLEE Tool (Social, Technical, Administrative, Political, Legal, Economic, and Environmental) as one of many means available to prioritize mitigation actions. Following a discussion of a range of benefit/cost issues, the Planning Team voted to cluster the action items by hazard as follows: #1 Multi -Hazard, #2 Earthquake, #3 Flooding, #4 Windstorm, and #5 Tsunami. The Team was unanimous in it belief that the "Multi -Hazard" actions would yield the greatest benefit to the jurisdiction. Public Meetings The public meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council allowed an opportunity for gathering public ideas and opinions about the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan goals and recommended action items. City Council Public Meeting: June 14, 2005 The public meeting provided information on the mitigation plan to the Hermosa Beach City Council and input was gathered on issues relating to natural hazards in the community. The following public input was received during the public meeting: 1 i. Invitation Process The Planning Team identifie pu is notice sources. A press'release was submitted tort local daily and weekly print media. Additionally, the Team sent letters of tnvitgtion to, ,(homeowner associations, etc.) Results The PlanningTeam representative and consultant eganthe presentation to the City Council by providing an overview of the mitigation process. Following the formal 'presentation, the Council and member.s_of thepublic were encouraged to ask questions and provide input to the Plan. The Planning Team representative anconsultant fielded questions bm, t e meeting participants. The meeting lasted, hours, and was aired on the City of Hermosa Beach cable access for approximately oneweek Appendix B - 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 Appendix B — Attachment 1 List of Reviewers City of Hermosa Beach Russell Tingley, Fire Chief Fire Department Brian Scott, Captain Fire Department Tom Thompson, Sergeant Police Department Sol Blumenfeld, Director Community Development Department Sam Perrotti, Planning Commissioner Planning Commission Rick Morgan, Director Public Works Department Ken Robertson, Senior Planner Community Development Department Office of Disaster Management Mike Martinet, Executive Director Office of Disaster Management Area "G" Appendix B - 4 Appendix B -Attachment 2 Levels of Concern Survey Results The City of Hermosa Beach distributed copies of the "Levels of Concern Survey" at City Hall and the Fire Station. Respondent were asked to rank their concerns about the following hazards: earthquakes, flooding, windstorms, and tsunamis. Fifty survey responses were received yielding the following results: Appendix B - 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Extremely Concerned Very Concerned Concerned Somewhat Concerned Not Concerned Earthquake 10 13 17 7 2 Flooding 1 6 10 22 11 Windstorm 2 11 18 17 Tsunami 9 9 12 10 10 Other - Wildfire 3 7 39 Other - Earth Movement 5 12 20 11 Appendix B - 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix B — Attachment 3 City Council Resolution Adopting Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Appendix B - 6 Appendix C: Benefit/Cost Analysis Benefit/cost analysis is a key mechanism used by the state Office of Emergency Services (OES), the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and other state and federal agencies in evaluating hazard mitigation projects, and is required by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Public Law 93-288, as amended. This appendix outlines several approaches for conducting economic analysis of natural hazard mitigation projects. It describes the importance of implementing mitigation activities, different approaches to economic analysis of mitigation strategies, and methods to calculate costs and benefits associated with mitigation strategies. Information in this section is derived in part from: The Interagency Hazards Mitigation Team, State Hazard Mitigation Plan, and Federal Emergency Management Agency Publication 331, Report on Costs and Benefits of Natural Hazard Mitigation. This section is not intended to provide a comprehensive description of benefit/cost analysis, nor is it intended to provide the details of economic analysis methods that can be used to evaluate local projects. It is intended to (1) raise benefit/cost analysis as an important issue, and (2) provide some background on how economic analysis can be used to evaluate mitigation projects. Why Evaluate Mitigation Strategies? Mitigation activities reduce the cost of disasters by minimizing property damage, injuries, and the potential for loss of life, and by reducing emergency response costs, which would otherwise be incurred. Evaluating natural hazard mitigation provides decision -makers with an understanding of the potential benefits and costs of an activity, as well as a basis upon which to compare alternative projects. Evaluating mitigation projects is a complex and difficult undertaking, which is influenced by many variables. First, natural disasters affect all segments of the communities they strike, including individuals, businesses, and public services such as fire, police, utilities, and schools. Second, while some of the direct and indirect costs of disaster damages are measurable, some of the costs are non-financial and difficult to quantify in dollars. Third, many of the impacts of such events produce "ripple -effects" throughout the community, greatly increasing the disaster's social and economic consequences. While not easily accomplished, there is value, from a public policy perspective, in assessing the positive and negative impacts from mitigation activities, and obtaining an instructive benefit/cost comparison. Otherwise, the decision to pursue or not pursue various mitigation options would not be based on an objective understanding of the net benefit or loss associated with these actions. Appendix C - 1 What are Some Economic Analysis Approaches for Mitigation Strategies? The approaches used to identify the costs and benefits associated with natural hazard mitigation strategies, measures, or projects fall into two general categories: benefit/cost analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. The distinction between the two methods is the way in which the relative costs and benefits are measured. Additionally, there are varying approaches to assessing the value of mitigation for public sector and private sector activities. Benefit/Cost Analysis Benefit/cost analysis is used in natural hazards mitigation to show if the benefits to life and property protected through mitigation efforts exceed the cost of the mitigation activity. Conducting benefit/cost analysis for a mitigation activity can assist communities in determining whether a project is worth undertaking now, in order to avoid disaster related damages later. Benefit/cost analysis is based on calculating the frequency and severity of a hazard, avoided future damages, and risk. In benefit/cost analysis, all costs and benefits are evaluated in terms of dollars, and a net benefit/cost ratio is computed to determine whether a project should be implemented (i.e., if net benefits exceed net costs, the project is worth pursuing). A project must have a benefit/cost ratio greater than 1 in order to be funded. Cost -Effectiveness Analysis Cost-effectiveness analysis evaluates how best to spend a given amount of money to achieve a specific goal. This type of analysis, however, does not necessarily measure costs and benefits in terms of dollars. Determining the economic feasibility of mitigating natural hazards can also be organized according to the perspective of those with an economic interest in the outcome. Hence, economic analysis approaches are covered for both public and private sectors as follows. Investing in public sector mitigation activities Evaluating mitigation strategies in the public sector is complicated because it involves estimating all of the economic benefits and costs regardless of who realizes them, and potentially to a large number of people and economic entities. Some benefits cannot be evaluated monetarily, but still affect the public in profound ways. Economists have developed methods to evaluate the economic feasibility of public decisions that involve a diverse set of beneficiaries and non - market benefits. Investing in private sector mitigation activities Private sector mitigation projects may occur on the basis of one of two approaches: it may be mandated by a regulation or standard, or it may be economically justified on its own merits. A building or landowner, whether a private entity or a public agency, required to conform to a mandated standard may consider the following options: Appendix C - 2 1. Request cost sharing from public agencies; 2. Dispose of the building or land either by sale or demolition; 3. Change the designated use of the building or land and change the hazard mitigation compliance requirement; or 4. Evaluate the most feasible alternatives and initiate the most cost effective hazard mitigation alternative. The sale of a building or land triggers another set of concerns. For example, real estate disclosure laws can be developed which require sellers of real property to disclose known defects and deficiencies in the property, including earthquake weaknesses and hazards to prospective purchasers. Correcting deficiencies can be expensive and time consuming, but their existence can prevent the sale of the building. Conditions of a sale regarding the deficiencies and the price of the building can be negotiated between a buyer and seller. How Can an Economic Analysis be Conducted? Benefit/cost analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis are important tools in evaluating whether or not to implement a mitigation activity. A framework for evaluating alternative mitigation activities is outlined below: 1. Identify the Alternatives: Alternatives for reducing risk from natural hazards can include structural projects to enhance disaster resistance, education and outreach, and acquisition or demolition of exposed properties, among others. Different mitigation project can assist in minimizing risk to natural hazards, but do so at varying economic costs. 2. Calculate the Costs and Benefits: Choosing economic criteria is essential to systematically calculating costs and benefits of mitigation projects and selecting the most appropriate alternative. Potential economic criteria to evaluate alternatives include: - Determine the project cost. This may include initial project development costs, and repair and operating costs of maintaining projects over time. - Estimate the benefits. Projecting the benefits or cash flow resulting from a project can be difficult. Expected future returns from the mitigation effort depend on the correct specification of the risk and the effectiveness of the project, which may not be well known. Expected future costs depend on the physical durability and potential economic obsolescence of the investment. This is difficult to project. These considerations will also provide guidance in selecting an appropriate salvage value. Future tax structures and rates must be projected. Financing alternatives must be researched, and they may include retained earnings, bond and stock issues, and commercial loans. Appendix C - 3 - Consider costs and benefits to society and the environment. These are not easily measured, but can be assessed through a variety of economic tools including existence value or contingent value theories. These theories provide quantitative data on the value people attribute to physical or social environments. Even without hard data, however, impacts of structural projects to the physical environment or to society should be considered when implementing mitigation projects. - Determine the correct discount rate. Determination of the discount rate can just be the risk-free cost of capital, but it may include the decision maker's time preference and also a risk premium. Including inflation should also be considered. 3. Analyze and Rank the Alternatives: Once costs and benefits have been quantified, economic analysis tools can rank the alternatives. Two methods for determining the best alternative given varying costs and benefits include net present value and internal rate of return. - Net present value. Net present value is the value of the expected future returns of an investment minus the value of expected future cost expressed in today's dollars. If the net present value is greater than the project costs, the project may be determined feasible for implementation. Selecting the discount rate, and identifying the present and future costs and benefits of the project calculates the net present value of projects. - Internal Rate of Return. Using the internal rate of return method to evaluate mitigation projects provides the interest rate equivalent to the dollar returns expected from the project. Once the rate has been calculated, it can be compared to rates earned by investing in alternative projects. Projects may be feasible to implement when the internal rate of return is greater than the total costs of the project. Once the mitigation projects are ranked on the basis of economic criteria, decision -makers can consider other factors, such as risk; project effectiveness; and economic, environmental, and social returns in choosing the appropriate project for implementation. How are Benefits of Mitigation Calculated? Economic Returns of Natural Hazard Mitigation The estimation of economic retums, which accrue to building or land owner as a result of natural hazard mitigation, is difficult. Owners evaluating the economic feasibility of mitigation should consider reductions in physical damages and financial losses. A partial list follows: - Building damages avoided - Content damages avoided Appendix C - 4 - Inventory damages avoided - Rental income losses avoided - Relocation and disruption expenses avoided - Proprietor's income losses avoided These parameters can be estimated using observed prices, costs, and engineering data. The difficult part is to correctly determine the effectiveness of the hazard mitigation project and the resulting reduction in damages and losses. Equally as difficult is assessing the probability that an event will occur. The damages and losses should only include those that will be borne by the owner. The salvage value of the investment can be important in determining economic feasibility. Salvage value becomes more important as the time horizon of the owner declines. This is important because most businesses depreciate assets over a period of time. Additional Costs from Natural Hazards Property owners should also assess changes in a broader set of factors that can change as a result of a large natural disaster. These are usually termed "indirect" effects, but they can have a very direct effect on the economic value of the owner's building or land. They can be positive or negative, and include changes in the following: - Commodity and resource prices - Availability of resource supplies - Commodity and resource demand changes - Building and land values - Capital availability and interest rates - Availability of labor - Economic structure - Infrastructure - Regional exports and imports - Local, state, and national regulations and policies - Insurance availability and rates Changes in the resources and industries listed above are more difficult to estimate and require models that are structured to estimate total economic impacts. Total economic impacts are the sum of direct and indirect economic impacts. Total economic impact models are usually not combined with economic feasibility models. Many models exist to estimate total economic impacts of changes in an economy. Decision makers should understand the total economic impacts of natural disasters in order to calculate the benefits of a mitigation activity. This suggests that understanding the local economy is an important first step in being able to understand the potential impacts of a disaster, and the benefits of mitigation activities. Additional Considerations Conducting an economic analysis for potential mitigation activities can assist decision - makers in choosing the most appropriate strategy for their community to reduce risk and prevent loss from natural hazards. Economic analysis can also save time and resources Appendix C - 5 from being spent on inappropriate or unfeasible projects. Several resources and models are listed on the following page that can assist in conducting an economic analysis for natural hazard mitigation activities. Benefit/cost analysis is complicated, and the numbers may divert attention from other important issues. It is important to consider the qualitative factors of a project associated with mitigation that cannot be evaluated economically. There are alternative approaches to implementing mitigation projects. Many communities are looking towards developing multi -objective projects. With this in mind, opportunity rises to develop strategies that integrate natural hazard mitigation with projects related to watersheds, environmental planning, community economic development, and small business development, among others. Incorporating natural hazard mitigation with other community projects can increase the viability of project implementation. Resources CUREe Kajima Project, Methodologies For Evaluating The Socio -Economic Consequences Of Large Earthquakes, Task 7.2 Economic Impact Analysis, Prepared by University of California, Berkeley Team, Robert A. Olson, VSP Associates, Team Leader; John M. Eidinger, G&E Engineering Systems; Kenneth A. Goettel, Goettel and Associates Inc.; and Gerald L. Horner, Hazard Mitigation Economics Inc., 1997. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Benefit/Cost Analysis of Hazard Mitigation Projects, Riverine Flood, Version 1.05, Hazard Mitigation Economics Inc., 1996. Federal Emergency Management Agency Report on Costs and Benefits of Natural Hazard Mitigation. Publication 331, 1996. Goettel & Horner Inc., Earthquake Risk Analysis Volume III: The Economic Feasibility of Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings in The City of Portland, Submitted to the Bureau of Buildings, City of Portland, August 30, 1995. Goettel & Horner Inc., Benefit/Cost Analysis of Hazard Mitigation Projects Volume V, Earthquakes, Prepared for FEMA's Hazard Mitigation Branch, October 25, 1995. Horner, Gerald, Benefit/Cost Methodologies for Use in Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of Proposed Hazard Mitigation Measures, Robert Olson Associates, Prepared for Oregon State Police, Office of Emergency Management, July 1999. Interagency Hazards Mitigation Team, State Hazard Mitigation Plan, (Oregon State Police — Office of Emergency Management, 2000). Risk Management Solutions, Inc., Development of a Standardized Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, National Institute of Building Sciences, Volume I and II, 1994. VSP Associates, Inc., A Benefit/Cost Model for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Appendix C - 6 Volumes 1 & 2, Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA, Publication Numbers 227 and 228, 1991. VSP Associates, Inc., Benefit/Cost Analysis of Hazard Mitigation Projects: Section 404 Hazard Mitigation Program and Section 406 Public Assistance Program, Volume 3: Seismic Hazard Mitigation Projects, 1993. VSP Associates, Inc., Seismic Rehabilitation of Federal Buildings: A Benefit/Cost Model, Volume 1, Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA, Publication Number 255, 1994. Appendix C - 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix D: Acronyms Federal Acronyms AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ATC Applied Technology Council b/ca benefit/cost analysis BFE Base Flood Elevation BLM Bureau of Land Management BSSC Building Seismic Safety Council CDBG Community Development Block Grant CFR Code of Federal Regulations CRS Community Rating System DOE Department of Energy EDA Economic Development Administration EPA Environmental Protection Agency ER Emergency Relief EWP Emergency Watershed Protection (NRCS Program) FAS Federal Aid System FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map FMA Flood Mitigation Assistance (FEMA Program) FTE Full Time Equivalent GIS Geographic Information System GNS Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences (International) GSA General Services Administration HAZUS Hazards U.S. HMGP Hazard Mitigation Grant Program HMST Hazard Mitigation Survey Team HUD Housing and Urban Development (United States, Department of) IBHS Institute for Business and Home Safety ICC Increased Cost of Compliance IHMT Interagency Hazard Mitigation Team NCDC National Climate Data Center NFIP National Flood Insurance Program NFPA National Fire Protection Association NHMP Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (also known as "409 Plan") NIBS National Institute of Building Sciences NIFC National Interagency Fire Center NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPS National Park Service NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NWS National Weather Service SBA Small Business Administration Appendix D - 1 SHMO TOR UGB URM USACE USBR USDA USFA USFS USGS WSSPC A&W AA AAR ARC ARP ATC20 ATC21 BCP BSA CAER Ca1ARP Ca1BO CaIEPA Ca1REP CALSTARS Ca1TRANS CBO CD CDF CDMG CEC CEPEC CESRS CHIP CHMIRS CHP CLETS CSTI CUEA CUPA DAD DFO State Hazard Mitigation Officer Transfer of Development Rights Urban Growth Boundary Unreinforced Masonry United States Army Corps of Engineers United States Bureau of Reclamation United States Department of Agriculture United States Fire Administration United States Forest Service United States Geological Survey Western States Seismic Policy Council California Acronyms Alert and Warning Administering Areas After Action Report American Red Cross Accidental Risk Prevention Applied Technology Counci120 Applied Technology Counci121 Budget Change Proposal California Bureau of State Audits Community Awareness & Emergency Response California Accidental Release Prevention California Building Officials California Environmental Protection Agency California Radiological Emergency Plan California State Accounting Reporting System California Department of Transportation Community Based Organization Civil Defense California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection California Division of Mines and Geology California Energy Commission California Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council California Emergency Services Radio System California Hazardous Identification Program California Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting System California Highway Patrol California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System California Specialized Training Institute California Utilities Emergency Association Certified Unified Program Agency Disaster Assistance Division (California Office of Emergency Services) Disaster Field Office Appendix D - 2 1 1 1 1 DGS DHSRHB DO DOC DOF DOJ DPA DPIG DR DSA DSR DSW DWR EAS EDIS EERI EMA EMI EMMA EMS EOC EOP EPEDAT EPI EPIC ESC FAY FDAA FEAT FEMA FFY FIR FIRESCOPE FMA FSR FY GIS HAZMAT HAZMIT HAZUS HAD HEICS HEPG HIA HMEP California Department of General Services California Department of Health Services, Radiological Health Branch Duty Officer Department Operations Center California Department of Finance California Department of Justice California Department of Personnel Administration Disaster Preparedness Improvement Grant Disaster Response Division of the State Architect Damage Survey Report Disaster Service Worker California Department of Water Resources Emergency Alerting System Emergency Digital Information System Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Emergency Management Assistance Emergency Management Institute Emergency Managers Mutual Aid Emergency Medical Services Emergency Operations Center Emergency Operations Plan Early Post Earthquake Damage Assessment Tool Emergency Public Information Emergency Public Information Council Emergency Services Coordinator Federal Award Year Federal Disaster Assistance Administration Governor's Flood Emergency Action Team Federal Emergency Management Agency Federal Fiscal Year Final Inspection Reports Firefighting Resources of Southern California Organized for Potential Emergencies Flood Management Assistance Feasibility Study Report Fiscal Year Geographical Information System Hazardous Materials Hazardous Mitigation Hazards United States (an earthquake damage assessment prediction tool) Housing and Community Development Hospital Emergency Incident Command System Hospital Emergency Planning Guidance Hazard Identification and Analysis Unit Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness Appendix D - 3 HMGP Hazard Mitigation Grant Program IDE Initial Damage Estimate IA Individual Assistance IFG Individual & Family Grant (program) IRG Incident Response Geographic Information System IPA Information and Public Affairs (of state Office of Emergency Services) LAN Local Area Network LEMMA Law Enforcement Master Mutual Aid LEPC Local Emergency Planning Committee MARAC Mutual Aid Regional Advisory Council MHFP Multi -Hazard Functional Plan MHID Multi -Hazard Identification MOU Memorandum of Understanding NBC Nuclear, Biological, Chemical NEMA National Emergency Management Agency NEMIS National Emergency Management Information System NFIP National Flood Insurance Program NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association NPP Nuclear Power Plant NSF National Science Foundation NWS National Weather Service OA Operational Area OASIS Operational Area Satellite Information System OCC Operations Coordination Center OCD Office of Civil Defense OEP Office of Emergency Planning OES California Governor's Office of Emergency Services OSHPD Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development OSPR Oil Spill Prevention and Response PA Public Assistance PC Personal Computer PDA Preliminary Damage Assessment PIO Public Information Office POST Police Officer Standards and Training PPA/CA Performance Partnership Agreement/Cooperative Agreement (FEMA) PSA Public Service Announcement PTAB Planning and Technological Assistance Branch PTR Project Time Report RA Regional Administrator (OES) RADEF Radiological Defense (program) RAMP Regional Assessment of Mitigation Priorities RAPID Railroad Accident Prevention & Immediate Deployment RDO Radiological Defense Officer RDMHC Regional Disaster Medical Health Coordinator REOC Regional Emergency Operations Center REPI Reserve Emergency Public Information Appendix D - 4 RES Regional Emergency Staff • RIMS Response Information Management System RMP Risk Management Plan RPU Radiological Preparedness Unit (OES) RRT Regional Response Team SAM State Administrative Manual SARA Superfund Amendments & Reauthorization Act SAVP Safety Assessment Volunteer Program SBA Small Business Administration SCO California State Controller's Office SEMS Standardized Emergency Management System SEPIC State Emergency Public Information Committee SLA State and Local Assistance SONGS San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station SOP Standard Operating Procedure SWEPC Statewide Emergency Planning Committee TEC Travel Expense Claim TRU Transuranic TTT Train the Trainer UPA Unified Program Account UPS Uninterrupted Power Source USAR Urban Search and Rescue USGS United States Geological Survey WC California State Warning Center WAN Wide Area Network WIPP Waste Isolation Pilot Project Appendix D - 5 Appendix E: Glossary Acceleration The rate of change of velocity with respect to time. Acceleration due to gravity at the earth's surface is 9.8 meters per second squared. That means that every second that something falls toward the surface of earth its velocity increases by 9.8 meters per second. Asset Any manmade or natural feature that has value, including, but not limited to people; buildings; infrastructure like bridges, roads, and sewer and water systems; lifelines like electricity and communication resources; or environmental, cultural, or recreational features like parks, dunes, wetlands, or landmarks. Base Flood Flood that has a 1 percent probability of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. Also known as the 100 -year flood. Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Elevation of the base flood in relation to a specified datum, such as the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929. The Base Flood Elevation is used as the standard for the National Flood Insurance Program. Bedrock The solid rock that underlies loose material, such as soil, sand, clay, or gravel. Building A structure that is walled and roofed, principally above ground and permanently affixed to a site. The term includes a manufactured home on a permanent foundation on which the wheels and axles carry no weight. Coastal High Hazard Area Area, usually along an open coast, bay, or inlet that is subject to inundation by storm surge and, in some instances, wave action caused by storms or seismic sources. Coastal Zones The area along the shore where the ocean meets the land as the surface of the land rises above the ocean. This land/water interface includes barrier islands, estuaries, beaches, coastal wetlands, and land areas having direct drainage to the ocean. Community Rating System (CRS) An NFIP program that provides incentives for NFIP communities to complete activities that reduce flood hazard risk. When the community completes specified activities, the insurance premiums of policyholders in these communities are reduced. Computer -Aided Design And Drafting (CADD) A computerized system enabling quick and accurate electronic 2-D and 3-D drawings, topographic mapping, site plans, and profile/cross- section drawings. Contour A line of equal ground elevation on a topographic (contour) map. Appendix E - 1 1 Critical Facility Facilities that are critical to the health and welfare of the population and that are especially important following hazard events. Critical facilities include, but are not limited to, shelters, police and fire stations, and hospitals. Debris The scattered remains of assets broken or destroyed in a hazard event. Debris caused by a wind or water hazard event can cause additional damage to other assets. Digitize To convert electronically points, lines, and area boundaries shown on maps into x, y coordinates (e.g., latitude and longitude, universal transverse mercator (UTM), or table coordinates) for use in computer applications. Displacement Time The average time (in days) which the building's occupants typically must operate from a temporary location while repairs are made to the original building due to damages resulting from a hazard event. Duration How long a hazard event lasts. Earthquake A sudden motion or trembling that is caused by a release of strain accumulated within or along the edge of earth's tectonic plates. Erosion Wearing away of the land surface by detachment and movement of soil and rock fragments, during a flood or storm or over a period of years, through the action of wind, water, or other geologic processes. Erosion Hazard Area Area anticipated being lost to shoreline retreat over a given period of time. The projected inland extent of the area is measured by multiplying the average annual long-term recession rate by the number of years desired. Essential Facility Elements important to ensure a full recovery of a community or state following a hazard event. These would include: government functions, major employers, banks, schools, and certain commercial establishments, such as grocery stores, hardware stores, and gas stations. Extent The size of an area affected by a hazard or hazard event. Extratropical Cyclone Cyclonic storm events like Nor'easters and severe winter low-pressure systems. Both West and East coasts can experience these non -tropical storms that produce gale -force winds and precipitation in the form of heavy rain or snow. These cyclonic storms, commonly called Nor'easters on the East Coast because of the direction of the storm winds, can last for several days and can be very large — 1,000 -mile wide storms are not uncommon. Fault A fracture in the continuity of a rock formation caused by a shifting or dislodging of the earth's crust, in which adjacent surfaces are differentially displaced parallel to the plane of fracture. Appendix E - 2 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Independent agency created in 1978 to provide a single point of accountability for all Federal activities related to disaster mitigation and emergency preparedness, response and recovery. Fire Potential Index (FPI) Developed by USGS and USFS to assess and map fire hazard potential over broad areas. Based on such geographic information, national policy makers and on -the -ground fire managers established priorities for prevention activities in the defined area to reduce the risk of managed and wildfire ignition and spread. Prediction of fire hazard shortens the time between fire ignition and initial attack by enabling fire managers to pre -allocate and stage suppression forces to high fire risk areas. Flash Flood A flood event occurring with little or no warning where water levels rise at an extremely fast rate. Flood ' A general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from (1) the overflow of inland or tidal waters, (2) the unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source, or (3) mudflows or the sudden collapse of shoreline land. Flood Depth Height of the flood water surface above the ground surface. Flood Elevation Elevation of the water surface above an established datum, e.g. National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929, North American Vertical Datum of 1988, or Mean Sea Level. Flood Hazard Area The area shown to be inundated by a flood of a given magnitude on a map. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Map of a community, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency that shows both the special flood hazard areas and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. Flood Insurance Study (FIS) A study that provides an examination, evaluation, and determination of flood hazards and, if appropriate, corresponding water surface elevations in a community or communities. Floodplain Any land area, including watercourse, susceptible to partial or complete inundation by water from any source. Frequency A measure of how often events of a particular magnitude are expected to occur. Frequency describes how often a hazard of a specific magnitude, duration, and/or extent typically occurs, on average. Statistically, a hazard with a 100 -year recurrence interval is expected to occur once every 100 years on average, and would have a 1 percent chance — its probability — of happening in any given year. The reliability of this information varies depending on the kind of hazard being considered. Appendix E - 3 Fujita Scale of Tornado Intensity Rates tornadoes with numeric values from FO to F5 based on tornado wind speed and damage sustained. An FO indicates minimal damage such as broken tree limbs or signs, while and F5 indicated severe damage sustained. Functional Downtime The average time (in days) during which a function (business or service) is unable to provide its services due to a hazard event. Geographic Area Impacted The physical area in which the effects of the hazard are experienced. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) A computer software application that relates physical features on the earth to a database to be used for mapping and analysis. Ground Motion The vibration or shaking of the ground during an earthquake. When a fault ruptures, seismic waves radiate, causing the ground to vibrate. The severity of the vibration increases with the amount of energy released and decreases with distance from the causative fault or epicenter, but soft soils can further amplify ground motions Hazard A source of potential danger or adverse condition. Hazards in this how to series will include naturally occurring events such as floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, tsunami, coastal storms, landslides, and wildfires that strike populated areas. A natural event is a hazard when it has the potential to harm people or property. Hazard Event A specific occurrence of a particular type of hazard. Hazard Identification The process of identifying hazards that threaten an area. Hazard Mitigation Sustained actions taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk from hazards and their effects. Hazard Profile A description of the physical characteristics of hazards and a determination of various descriptors including magnitude, duration, frequency, probability, and extent. In most cases, a community can most easily use these descriptors when they are recorded and displayed as maps. HAZUS (Hazards U.S.) A GIS -based nationally standardized earthquake loss estimation tool developed by FEMA. Appendix E - 4 Hurricane . An intense tropical cyclone, formed in the atmosphere over warm ocean areas, in which wind speeds reach 74 -miles -per -hour or more and blow in a large spiral around a relatively calm center or "eye." Hurricanes develop over the north Atlantic Ocean, northeast Pacific Ocean, or the south Pacific Ocean east of 160°E longitude. Hurricane circulation is counter -clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere and clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere. Hydrology The science of dealing with the waters of the earth. A flood discharge is developed by a hydrologic study. Infrastructure Refers to the public services of a community that have a direct impact on the quality of life. Infrastructure includes communication technology such as phone lines or Internet access, vital services such as public water supplies and sewer treatment facilities, and includes an area's transportation system such as airports, heliports; highways, bridges, tunnels, roadbeds, overpasses, railways, bridges, rail yards, depots; and waterways, canals, locks, seaports, ferries, harbors, dry docks, piers and regional dams. Intensity A measure of the effects of a hazard event at a particular place. Landslide Downward movement of a slope and materials under the force of gravity. Lateral Spreads Develop on gentle slopes and entail the sidelong movement of large masses of soil as an underlying layer liquefies in a seismic event. The phenomenon that occurs when ground shaking causes loose soils to lose strength and act like viscous fluid. Liquefaction causes two types of ground failure: lateral spread and loss of bearing strength. Liquefaction Results when the soil supporting structures liquefies. This can cause structures to tip and topple. Lowest Floor Under the NFIP, the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement) of a structure. Magnitude A measure of the strength of a hazard event. The magnitude (also referred to as severity) of a given hazard event is usually determined using technical measures specific to the hazard. Mitigation Plan A systematic evaluation of the nature and extent of vulnerability to the effects of natural hazards typically present in the state and includes a description of actions to minimize future vulnerability to hazards. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Federal program • created by Congress in 1968 that makes flood insurance available in communities that enact minimum floodplain management regulations in 44 CFR §60.3. Appendix E - 5 National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD) Datum established in 1929 and used in the NF1P as a basis for measuring flood, ground, and structural elevations, previously referred to as Sea Level Datum or Mean Sea Level. The Base Flood Elevations shown on most of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency are referenced to NGVD. National Weather Service (NWS) Prepares and issues flood, severe weather, and coastal storm warnings and can provide technical assistance to Federal and state entities in preparing weather and flood warning plans. Nor'easter An extra -tropical cyclone producing gale -force winds and precipitation in the form of heavy snow or rain. Outflow Follows water inundation creating strong currents that rip at structures and pound them with debris, and erode beaches and coastal structures. Planimetric Describes maps that indicate only man-made features like buildings. Planning The act or process of making or carrying out plans; the establishment of goals, policies and procedures for a social or economic unit. Probability A statistical measure of the likelihood that a hazard event will occur. Recurrence Interval The time between hazard events of similar size in a given location. It is based on the probability that the given event will be equaled or exceeded in any given year. • Repetitive Loss Property A property that is currently insured for which two or more National Flood Insurance Program losses (occurring more than ten days apart) of at least $1000 each have been paid within any 10 -year period since 1978. Replacement Value The cost of rebuilding a structure. This is usually expressed in terms of cost per square foot, and reflects the present-day cost of labor and materials to construct a building of a particular size, type and quality. Richter Scale A numerical scale of earthquake magnitude devised by seismologist C.F. Richter in 1935. Risk The estimated impact that a hazard would have on people, services, facilities, and structures in a community; the likelihood of a hazard event resulting in an adverse condition that causes injury or damage. Risk is often expressed in relative terms such as a high, moderate or low likelihood of sustaining damage above a particular threshold due to a specific type of hazard event. It also can be expressed in terms of potential monetary losses associated with the intensity of the hazard. Riverine Of or produced by a river. Scale A proportion used in determining a dimensional relationship; the ratio of the distance between two points on a map and the actual distance between the two points on the earth's surface. Appendix E - 6 Scarp A steep slope. Scour Removal of soil or fill material by the flow of flood waters. The term is frequently used to describe storm-induced, localized conical erosion around pilings and other foundation supports where the obstruction of flow increases turbulence. Seismicity Describes the likelihood of an area being subject to earthquakes. Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) An area within a floodplain having a 1 percent or greater chance of flood occurrence in any given year (100-year floodplain); represented on Flood Insurance Rate Maps by darkly shaded areas with zone designations that include the letter A or V. Stafford Act The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, PL 100-107 was signed into law November 23, 1988 and amended the Disaster Relief Act of 1974, PL 93-288. The Stafford Act is the statutory authority for most Federal disaster response activities, especially as they pertain to FEMA and its programs. State Hazard Mitigation Officer (SHMO) The representative of state government who is the primary point of contact with FEMA, other state and Federal agencies, and local units of government in the planning and implementation of pre- and post- disaster mitigation activities. Storm Surge Rise in the water surface above normal water level on the open coast due to the action of wind stress and atmospheric pressure on the water surface. Structure Something constructed. (See also Building) Substantial Damage Damage of any origin sustained by a structure in a Special Flood Hazard Area whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before- damaged condition would equal or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage. Super Typhoon A typhoon with maximum sustained winds of 150 mph or more. Surface Faulting The differential movement of two sides of a fracture — in other words, the location where the ground breaks apart. The length, width, and displacement of the ground characterize surface faults. Tectonic Plate Torsionally rigid, thin segments of the earth's lithosphere that may be assumed to move horizontally and adjoin other plates. It is the friction between plate boundaries that cause seismic activity. Topographic Characterizes maps that show natural features and indicate the physical shape of the land using contour lines. These maps may also include manmade features. Appendix E - 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tornado A violently rotating column of air extending from a thunderstorm to the ground. . Tropical Cyclone A generic term for a cyclonic, low-pressure system over tropical or subtropical waters. Tropical Depression A tropical cyclone with maximum sustained winds of less than 39 mph. Tropical Storm A tropical cyclone with maximum sustained winds greater than 39 mph and less than 74 mph. Tsunami Great sea wave produced by submarine earth movement or volcanic eruption. Typhoon A special category of tropical cyclone peculiar to the western North Pacific Basin, frequently affecting areas in the vicinity of Guam and the North Mariana Islands. Typhoons whose maximum sustained winds attain or exceed 150 mph are called super typhoons. Vulnerability Describes how exposed or susceptible to damage an asset is. Vulnerability depends on an asset's construction, contents, and the economic value of its functions. Like indirect damages, the vulnerability of one element of the community is often related to the vulnerability of another. For example, many businesses depend on uninterrupted electrical power — if an electric substation is flooded, it will affect not only the substation itself, but a number of businesses as well. Often, indirect effects can be much more widespread and damaging than direct ones. Vulnerability Assessment The extent of injury and damage that may result from a hazard event of a given intensity in a given area. The vulnerability assessment should address impacts of hazard events on the existing and future built environment. Water Displacement When a large mass of earth on the ocean bottom sinks or uplifts, the column of water directly above it is displaced, forming the tsunami wave. The rate of displacement, motion of the ocean floor at the epicenter, the amount of displacement of the rupture zone, and the depth of water above the rupture zone all contribute to the intensity of the tsunami. Wave Run-up The height that the wave extends up to on steep shorelines, measured above a reference level (the normal height of the sea, corrected to the state of the tide at the time of wave arrival). Wildfire An uncontrolled fire spreading through vegetative fuels, exposing and possibly consuming structures. Zone A geographical area shown on a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that reflects the severity or type of flooding in the area. Appendix E - 8 1 INI1 = NE NM I MI I M N N 1 MI 111111 = Appendix E - 9