Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07/12/05
AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, July 12, 2005 - 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall' 1315 Valley Drive MAYOR CITY CLERK J. R. Reviczky Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Peter Tucker John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Sam Y. Edgerton Stephen R. Burrell Michael Keegan CITY ATTORNEY Art Yoon Michael Jenkins CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INTERVIEW APPLICANTS FOR: PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATIONS ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA PACKET FOR JULY 12, 2005 UNDER ITEM 8a APPOINTMENTS WILL BE MADE AT THE REGULAR, CITY COUNCIL MEETING THAT FOLLOWS THIS INTERVIEW MEETING. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: THIS MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED LIVE ON ADELPHIA CABLE t "Drag your thoughts away from your troubles - by the ears, by the heels, or any other way you can manage it. It's the healthiest thing a body can do." - Mark Twain AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 12, 2005 - Council Chambers, City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK J. R. Reviczky Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Peter Tucker John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Sam Y. Edgerton Stephen R. Burrell Michael Keegan CITY ATTORNEY Art Yoon Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer. City Council agendas and staff reportsare available for your review on the City's web site located at www.hermosabch.org CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2005: NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda as a business item. 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction, or to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar, may do so at this time. Comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Comments from the public are limited to three minutes per speaker. Members of the audience may also speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during. Public Hearings; and, 3) during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. The City Council acknowledges receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in written communications. The Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. NO WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 4, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on June 1, 2005; and, 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on June 14, 2005. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to accept donations of $5,000.00 from Friends of the Parks to be used for the Lawnbowling Green renovation and $8,000.00 from ChevronTexaco to be used for the Chevron Surf Camp. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated July 5, 2005. (e) Recommendation to receive and file notice of closed claims. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated June 30, 2005. • • (f) Recommendation to approve contract for City advertising (legal and display ads) with the Easy Reader newspaper and approve contract for a term of three years. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 7, 2005. (g) Recommendation to receive and file the revised action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of May 18, 2005. (h) Recommendation to authorize the purchase of two transport ambulances from Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc. in the amount of $211,087.50 and appropriate funds from the Equipment Replacement Fund. Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated July 6, 2005. (i) (l) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving final map #060281 for a 2 -unit condo at 706 Monterey Boulevard. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 12, 2005. Recommendation to award purchase of one (1) 2005 Chevrolet Silverado Truck from Wondries Fleet Group of Alhambra, California in the amount of $27,284.87; authorize staff to reappropriate funds from budget year 04-05 from the Equipment Replacement Fund for this purchase; authorize an additional appropriation of $1,035; and, authorize staff to issue the appropriate purchase documents as required. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated July 5, 2005. (k) Recommendation to refer an appeal of employee relation officer's determination on request for unit modification to the City's Civil Service Board for a hearing and final determination. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager. Michael Earl dated July 7, 2005. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated July 7, 2005. (1) (m) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Hermosa Beach Police Management Bargaining Unit. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated July 7, 2005. v. (n) Recommendation to approve the award of contract to David Taussig & Associates, Inc. in the amount of $30,000 to provide Assessment Engineering services for the Bonnie Brae Utility Underground District; award of contract to Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth in the amount of $41,000 to provide Bond Counsel services; award of contract to Northcross, Hill & Ach in the amount of $25,000 as Financial Advisors for bond sales; authorize the City Manager to execute the above contracts on behalf of the City; and, advance $30,000 from the Contingency Fund to the Bonnie Brae Utility Underground District to fund the contract services of David Taussig & Associates. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated July 6, 2005. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE n 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. a. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE AND APPROVE THE CONDOMINIUM PROJECT SUBJECT TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE AT 19 SECOND STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated June 21, 2005. RECOMMENDATION:, Adopt a resolution sustaining the Planning Commission's decision to deny the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. CITYWIDE SPEED SURVEY AND POSTED SPEED LIMITS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated July 6, 2005. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Citywide Speed Survey prepared by AAE, Inc.; and, waive full reading and introduce ordinance establishing citywide posted speed limits. • • b. ALTERNATIVE ORDINANCE FOR THE CONSIDERATION BY THE VOTERS FOR CONTROLLING IMPROVEMENTS ON THE GREENBELT AND ON THE BEACH. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 7, 2005' 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. APPOINTMENT TO SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD — MS. JANICE WEBB OF CITIBANK. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 12, 2005. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the re -nomination of Ms. Janice Webb of Citibank to be re -appointed to serve on the South Bay Workforce Investment Board as the representative of the Hermosa Beach private sector for a 4 -year term from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2009. b. PARKING CASH KEY PROGRAM -RESIDENTIAL DISCOUNT. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 12, 2005. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council provide direction to staff regarding initialing a resident discount for the Cash Key Program. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS — APPOINTMENT TO PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION.'. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 6, 2005. RECOMMENDATION: Appoint from among the applicants interviewed earlier this evening to fill vacancy. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request from Mayor Pro Tempore Tucker to set a policy to require anyone building a basement to sign and record a waiver acknowledging the potential of flooding of the area. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 7, 2005. 5 ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: a. Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on June 14, 2005; and, b. Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on June 28, 2005. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Employee Organizations: Stephen Burrell Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association Teamsters Union, Local 911 Professional and Administrative Employee Group Hermosa Beach Management Association Unrepresented employees 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Government Code Section 54957 Title: CITY MANAGER ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ADJOURNMENT 6 Smith named midway boss at new Southern Calif. fair i Page 1 of 2 Congratulations to Disneyland on their 50th Annlversary I Mb a masementbusiness j SHOWMEN'S MARKETPLACE CLASSIFIED EMPLOYMENT SEARCHABLE CLASSIFIED MEMBERS' AREA editorial archive charts archive DEPARTMENTS industry news venues parks & attractions fairs & festivals carnivals industry calendar concerts/boxscore AB SERVICES Add/Update Your Listing AB directories order year end charts FAQ media kit where to buy . AB contacts rl Ir �� hL 1 i0 DuPont Indusbial I himadadwerarComlblp The International Journal Of Out -Of -Home Ente MEMBER'S AREA + Print Subscribers Click Here LOGIA wlscai = SUBSCRIPTIDft REQUIRED ARCHIVE SAVE I EMAIL I PRINT I MOST POPULAR i RSS June 20, 2005 Smith named midway boss at new Southern Calif. fair KM I REPRINTS s Related ► Willia Men to Apollo ► AB N The organizer of the inaugural Beach Cities Summer May 1C Spectacular fair in Redondo Beach, Calif., has ► AB N named Keala Smith midway director and vp special Friday, events. Smith is the daughter-in-law of the late amusement clic k a industry veteran Paul "Duke" Smith, founder of Allied in this Specialty Insurance. Peopl Thefair is planned for Aug. 25-28 at Redondo Beach .► Paul Performing Arts Center and Aviation Park, a half- ► Keay ► Joe hour south of Los Angeles. ►Bead Art Cer "This is a very exciting time for the residents of the ► Shan beach cities, one of the wealthiest communities in Los Angeles County," Smith said in a statement. 'We Comp will behome to the largest midway ever in the beach ► Beacl ► Allied Cities. Insular Joe and Shantelle Blash of Shamrock Shows will provide the midway. "I love working with Joe and Shantelle ... and they are the Hollywood show," Smith said. "When a ► North ► Coca ► Rock: Cone ► bead ► bead http://www.amusementbusiness.com/amusementbusiness/search/article display jsp?vnu_cont... 7/12/05 • Smith named midway boss at new Southern Calif. fair Page 2 of 2 OW• Wpm /1.1VV10110•1$ ohmE P.O. fox 174 Orlando, FL 32802 407.855.3939 www.Strates.com Ads by Google Amusement Park Discount Huge selection of new & used. Check out the deals now! www.eBay.com Used amusement park rides M-4 & SX -2 Motion Simulator, Your Mpeg Film can become Your new Ride www.simworx.com Free Six Flags Coupons Free Six Flags coupons. Save now on your next family vacation. www, membe rpro motions. corn • television show or feature film needs a carnival, (they).go to Shamrock Shows." Admission to the fair, organized by Beach Cities Presents Llc., will be free. Sponsorships include Los Angeles -based global defense company Northrop Grumman, which will provide more than 1,500 free parking spaces, Coca-Cola, energy drink maker Rockstar Inc. and Manhattan Beach, Calif. -based developer Jordan Development, which will sponsor the fair's kiddie land. "For a first-year. event, I am pleased to find such great sponsors," Smith said. "We are still working with large corporate sponsors and hope to have on board several other high-end brands attached to our event." Citibank will conduct banking and financial services on the midway under the direction of a local branch manager. Nick Poulos, a graphic artist prolific in Hollywood, designed the fair's logo to incorporate a beach ball design. Local promoter Lobo Prods. is handling advertising and marketing for the event. SAVE I EMAIL I PRINT I MOST POPULAR I RSS ( f I REPRINTS e Copyright 2005 Amusement Business Wristbands and Ticket Printing by National Ticket Company © 2005 VNU eMedia Inc. All rights reserved. Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy. © kiddie ► globa compal ► parkil Categ P Spon ► Midw ► Rolle' http://www.amusementbusiness.com/amusementbusiness/search/article display jsp?vnu cont... 7/12/05 • 9�a'��7-s MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Monday, June 1, 2005, at the hour of 7:10 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Keegan, Edgerton, Tucker, Yoon, Mayor Reviczky Absent: None PUBLIC PARTICIPATION — None City Manager Burrell requested that the Council add to the agenda as item 3 the issue of the 11th Street property (storage building) Phase II results. Action: To add to this evening's agenda as item 3, for Council review and action, the issue of the 11th Street property (storage building) Phase II results, based on the findings that the matter arose after the posting of the agenda and that it required immediate action. Motion Edgerton, second Yoon. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Mayor Reviczky directed, with the consensus of the Council, 'that the order of- the agenda be suspended, immediately following the presentation of the budget staff reports, to take up Item 2 in order to accommodate the audience members present to.address that item. 1. PRELIMINARY BUDGET REVIEW. a. Overview of Budget Changes b. Overview of Revenue Changes c. Review of Department Expenditures City Manager Burrell presented an overview of the budget, noting that this was the first budget that could not be changed 'by the State due to the passage of Proposition 1A, a constitutional amendment,which garnered 86 - percent voter approval. He spoke of the lack of growth in sales tax, mainly due to the recent loss of the BMW dealership, and said staff would be recommending revenue increases for Council consideration at a future meeting in order to avoid impacts on City operations and services. Finance Director Copeland presented a PowerPoint presentation, providing information on revenues, transfers in and out, and appropriations, noting an 8 -percent increase in property taxes, a 12 -percent increase in the transient occupancy tax (TOT), and a 16 -percent decrease in sales tax due to the loss of auto dealers, including BMW. City Manager Burrell reviewed the list of 2005-06 Capital Improvement projects, including street improvements at various locations, the Aviation tree project, sewer projects, and the improvement of Clark field and other public building and grounds, noting that this was a very ambitious program. City Council Minutes 06-01-05 Page 11671 341) (At 7:35 p.m., the order of the agenda was suspended to go to item 2.) City Manager Burrell and Finance Director Copeland responded to Council questions. -Council discussion resulted in the following direction to staff: • Research the Loma Utility Underground Improvement Fund balance to determine if all expenses have been paid and return any surplus funds to the homeowners. • Schedule a Council goal -setting session, and also, at some point in the future, schedule a separate workshop to begin the development of a plan for the fire station, the police station and the civic center, perhaps establishing a citizens committee to help. • Look again at the feasibility of joining the City of Redondo Beach for animal disposal. • Confer with the residents on Rhodes before designing the street. City Manager Burrell said the budget would be brought back for adoption at the meeting of June 14, 2005. 2. LETTER FROM HERMOSA BEACH HISTORICAL SOCIETY REQUESTING $10,000 FUNDING FOR THEIR MUSEUM EXPANSION PROJECT. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Rick Koenig — Hermosa Beach, representing the Historical Society, said the request was for matching funds to be used for electrical upgrade, general space lighting and safety equipment, including emergency exit lighting, panic bar door hardware and compliance with the American Disabilities Act (ADA), which are important improvements. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions, saying the money could be allocated now subject to the condition that itemized cost estimates be submitted for Council review and approval prior to the release of funds. Action: To allocate in the budget the requested $10,000, with the stipulation that the funds would not be disbursed until the Council has reviewed and approved all relevant documents related to the project, including itemized cost estimates, with direction to staff to review the use of CDBG funds and, if CDBG funds may not be used, to look at using the Parks & Recreation fund. Motion Yoon, second Keegan. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote by Edgerton. (At 7:47 p.m., the order of the agenda returned to item 1, the budget review.) City Council Minutes 06-01-05 Page 11672 • 3. 11TH STREET PROPERTY (STORAGE BUILDING) PHASE II RESULTS AND AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000 TO PERFORM STEP OUT BORINGS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 1, 2005. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions, explaining that the purpose of the additional borings was to determine the size of the area containing the chemical that was found. Action: To authorize an additional $5,000 to perform step out borings around the location where a chemical was found, as recommended by staff. Motion Yoon, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote by Keegan. ADJOURNMENT - The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council ,of•the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Monday June 1, 2005, at the hour of 9:22 p.m. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, June 14, 2005, at the hour of 7:10 p.m. City Council Minutes 06-01-05 Page 11673 • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, June 14, 2005, at the hour of 7:10 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Greg Wyatt ROLL CALL: Present: Edgerton, Keegan, Tucker, Mayor Reviczky Absent: Yoon ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Pro Tempore Tucker noted that it was Flag Day; and discussed the Rally for Life event on July 23 and 24 at the old Aviation High location — a fun event for a serious cause, a cancer cure — and said more information could be obtained by contacting Pat Love at 318-0119 or love @ netzero.net. He then offered congratulations to the local high schools, Mira Costa and Redondo, for their recent athletic accomplishments. Mayor Reviczky said for about four years Hermosa Beach firefighters, sponsored by the Hermosa Beach Sister Cities Association, had been providing paramedic training in Loreto, Mexico, and that an important milestone had been reached. He explained that one gentleman, out of 12 being trained, had passed his final exam, based on U.S. standards, to become a paramedic, no small accomplishment, and it was expected that others would do the same. PRESENTATIONS PRESENTATION OF DONATION TO THE LAWN BOWLING CLUB FROM THE FRIENDS OF THE PARKS Lyle Campbell, president of the Lawn Bowling Club, thanked the Friends of the Parks, which their Club had been working with, for their donation and presented the $5,000 check to the City for the Club's lawn renovation; said invitations would soon go out for a Lawn Bowling Club Open House in October, and that they would entertain day camp children with a morning of lawn bowling; said they normally bowl every Tuesday and Thursday at 11:45 a.m. and Saturday at 9:45 a.m. and invited interested persons to stop by; presented T-shirts to the City Council and said the Club was planning a celebration next year to celebrate 70 years of lawn bowling in Hermosa Beach. Laura Raymond, President, Friends of the Parks, said she was pleased to be part of the presentation and had enjoyed working with the Lawn Bowling Club; said that information about both groups could be obtained at the Friends of the Parks website at www.hbfop.orq; said that the Friends of the Parks met ,each Wednesday at 6:00 p.m. in Room 4 of the Community Center; invited the community to participate in their fundraising banner program at Fort Lots -O -Fun and to attend their Movie in the Park on August 27. City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11674 2 a(2) • • GREG WYATT, PRESIDENT HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB Greg Wyatt, Kiwanis Club, said for many years the City has allowed the Kiwanis Club to operate a Christmas tree lot on the lawn at the Community Center, and the Club was presenting a $5,000 check to the Hermosa Beach Arts Foundation to shows its appreciation; said the bulk of the funds raised at the Christmas tree lot go toward scholarships and other community services and activities. Rick Koenig, Hermosa Beach Arts Foundation, thanked the Kiwanis Club and said that these greatly appreciated funds would be reinvested in the community for programs and services at the Community Center; said anyone interested in joining the Foundation may call 798-2100 for more information. CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF MAY 10, 2005: No reportable actions. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS a. Letter from Jim Parker of the Beach Cities Masonic Lodge requesting permission to install a banner as a non-profit organization. Coming forward to address the Council on this issue was: Jim Parker — Masonic Lodge located in Manhattan Beach, explained that the Hermosa Beach Lodge met above the theater at the Community Center for 65 years and then moved to its new site in Manhattan Beach; said they were in the process of putting together a 9/11 remembrance with the El Segundo lodge and would like to put up a banner on Pacific Coast Highway and Tenth Street in Hermosa Beach; asked that the Council make an exception to the rule that states a non- profit organization must be located within the City to place a banner on PCH since their lodge is made up of residents from Hermosa Beach as well as Manhattan Beach. Action: Council consensus was to give direction to staff to consider this organization as a local one for this purpose. (Yoon absent) b. Letter from Roger Creighton dated May 29, 2005 regarding sidewalk access. Action: To receive and file and to give direction to staff to report back. Motion Keegan, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11675 c. Letter from Roger Creighton dated May 29, 2005 regarding fire hydrants. Action: To receive and file. Motion Keegan, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Roger Creighton - Hermosa Beach, said he was pleased to see that Hermosa Beach was giving tickets to control speed on The Strand and encouraged the continuance; Sam Perrotti — Hermosa Beach Art Walk, announced the next Art Walk on Thursday, June 16, from 5 to 9 p.m. on upper Pier Avenue; said the May event was very successful, the artists sold paintings and retail establishments had increased business; Patty Egerer — Hermosa Beach, asked the Council to review the policyon. renaming streets; asked if the entire plaza or just the pier head had been named. Schumacher Plaza (City Manager Burrell said there was no policy about renaming streets, that the Schumacher Plaza name applied to only the pier head, that sometimes a donation comes with a request for a name, as this one did, and it was approved by the Council, and that these issues are handled on a case-by-case basis); Steve Bopp — Redondo Union High School Centennial Celebration, presented the Council with T-shirts and a yearbook in appreciation for the City's contribution toward the celebration; and Aaron Marks — President of the Hermosa Beach Firefighters Association, said the association had created a proposal to purchase new ambulances, increase ambulance revenue to offset the cost, outsource billing, and increase staffing to meet safety concerns for staff, residents, visitors and additional workload; said after Fire Department management refused to present the proposal to the Council, the association itself presented the proposal in December 2004, at which time the Council directed staff to work with the association and report back in April 2005, which did not happen; said the association reached out to management many timesand last Thursday management responded *with its own version of the proposal which, although it addresses many of the concerns, falls short on staffing issues. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (m), with the exception of the following items, which were removed for discussion in item 4, but are shown in order for clarity: 2(d) Mayor Reviczky, (h) and (I) Keegan. Motion Tucker, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11676 • • At 7:40 p.m., the order of the agenda was suspended to go to public hearing items 5(a) and (b). (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE MINUTES OF . THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON MAY 24 2005. Action: To approve as presented the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of May 24, 2005. (Yoon absent) (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY CHECK REGISTER NOS. 40409 THROUGH 40619 INCLUSIVE, AND TO APPROVE THE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NO. 40410 AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (Yoon absent) (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items as presented. (Yoon absent) (d) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT THE DONATION OF $20 FROM KIRK W. REEVE TO BE USED FOR JAZZ MEMORIAL PLAQUES. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated June 2, 2005. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Reviczky in order to acknowledge and thank the donor. Action: To accept the donation of $20 from Kirk W. Reeve to be used for the Jazz Memorial plaques. Motion Mayor Reviczky, second Keegan. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 18, 2005. Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of May 18, 2005. (Yoon absent) (f) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #060935 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 634 SEVENTH STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated June 7, 2005. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 05- 6393, entitled " A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11677 i • • PARCEL MAP NO. 060935 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 634 SEVENTH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (Yoon absent) (g) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #061058 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 24 EIGHTH STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 23, 2005. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 05- 6394, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 061058 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 24 EIGHTH TENTH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (Yoon absent) (h) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH ALLOWING CONNECTION TO THE MANHATTAN BEACH SEWER; APPROPRIATE $12,000 FROM THE SEWER FUND (160) TO PAY THE SEWER CONNECTION FEE; AND APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF $25,000 FROM CIP NO. 03-418 TO CIP NO. 02-412 TO COMPLETE THE SEWER CONNECTION. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated June 6, 2005. (i) This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Pro Tempore Tucker to thank Mayor Reviczky for suggesting this cost-effective solution. Action: To approve staff recommendation to: (1) Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the City of Manhattan Beach allowing the connection to the Manhattan Beach sewer; (2) Appropriate $12,000 from the Sewer Fund (160) to pay the Sewer Connection Fee; and (3) Approve the transfer: of $25,000 from CIP No. 03-418 to CIP No. 02- 412 to complete the sewer connection. Motion Tucker, second Keegan. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD CONTRACT FOR PROJECT CIP 04-534 PARK IMPROVEMENTS — BOWLING GREEN LAWN RENOVATION TO TRUGREEN LANDCARE OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,880; AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATION OF THE $5,000 DONATION FROM THE LAWN BOWLING CLUB; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE CONTRACT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES AS City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11678 G) • • NECESSARY WITHIN THE APPROPRIATED PROJECT BUDGET. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated June 7, 2005. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Pro Tempore Tucker for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve staff recommendation to: (1) Award contract for Project CIP 04-534 Park Improvements — Bowling Green Lawn Renovation to TruGreen Landcare of Gardena, California in the amount of $19,880; (2) Authorize appropriation of the $5,000 donation from the Lawn Bowling Club; (3) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; and (4) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within the appropriated project budget. Motion Tucker, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD CONTRACT TO RENOVATE THE FIRE STATION CREW RESTROOMS PER FIRE DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS TO KEN LEAL PLUMBING AND AUTHORIZE $5,681 FROM ACCOUNT #180-8610-4201, "STATION SECOND STORY SUBFLOOR REPLACEMENT," TO FUND THE PROJECT. Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated June 7, 2005. Action: To award contract to renovate the fire station crew restrooms per Fire Department specifications to Ken Leal Plumbing and authorize $5,681 from account #180-8610-4201, "station second story subfloor replacement," to fund the project, as recommended by staff. (Yoon absent) (k) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF TEN MATTRESSES AND ONE BUNK BED FRAME AND AUTHORIZE $2,141.53 FROM ACCOUNT #180-8610-4201, "STATION SECOND STORY SUBFLOOR REPLACEMENT," TO COMPLETE THE PURCHASE OF THE MATTRESSES AND BUNK BED FRAME. Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated June 7, 2005. (1) Action: To approve the purchase of ten mattresses and one bunk bed frame and to authorize $2,141.53 from account #180-8610-4201, "station second story subfloor replacement", to complete the purchase of the mattresses and bunk bed frame, as recommended by staff. (Yoon absent) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND THE PALOS VERDES PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCY TO ACQUIRE 722 ACRES City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11679 OF OPEN SPACE AND CREATE THE PORTUGUESE BEND NATURE PRESERVE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 9, 2005. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 05- 6395, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND THE PALOS VERDES PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCY TO ACQUIRE 722 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE AND CREATE THE PORTUGUESE BEND NATURE PRESERVE." (Yoon. absent) (m) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE . OF CANON IMAGERUNNER DIGITAL COPY/PRINT/SCAN/FAX NETWORKED OFFICE SYSTEMS FOR CITY HALL. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated 'June 7, 2005. Supplemental fax from Canon Copier regarding agreement for leasing copiers. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize the purchase of Canon ImageRunner Digital Copy/Print/Scan/Fax Networked Office Systems for City Hall. (Yoon absent) 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 05-1250 — "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE PLUMBING CODE (CHAPTER 15.16) TO REQUIRE THE RETROFITTING OF GREASE REMOVAL SYSTEMS` FOR FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS, PROVIDING FOR ANNUAL INSPECTION OF GREASE RECOVERY SYSTEMS IN ALL FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated May 25, 2005. Action: To waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 05-1250. Motion Keegan, second Tucker. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Edgerton, Keegan, Tucker, Mayor Reviczky NOES: None ABSENT: Yoon ABSTAIN: None At 9:05 p.m., the order of the agenda went to municipal matters item 6(a) 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11680 • • Items 2(d), (h) and (i) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. The meeting recessed at 8:38 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:07 p.m., with consent ordinance item 3(a). 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. 2005-2006 BUDGET AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (1) ADOPTION OF 2005-2006 BUDGET. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated June 7, 2005. Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:02 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Kevin McCarthy — General Manager of The Beach House and Chairman of the Board for the Chamber of Commerce, said he was encouraged that the Council consensus seemed to be to not increase the transient occupancy tax; said increasing this tax would decrease occupancy and that increased occupancy in the last four years has benefited the City; said the Chamber of Commerce had invested $46,000 in advertising and would invest another $10,000 on behalf of all hotels to make them competitive, which increases hotel revenue and the TOT to the City; Mahesh Patel — Hampton Inn and Suites, said that room rates, as well as occupancy, had increased and that more tax was coming to the City; Rav Chen — General Manager, Holiday Inn Express, said that hotel business marketing was not easy and asked the Council, even though the City had a tight budget, to think very carefully before its final decision on a possible 2% increase of the TOT; Daniel Marinelli — an owner at The Beach House Hotel, said he realized the City needed extra revenue and that the State or Federal governments might find a way to take part of the Utility Users Tax, but felt it was important for the City's hotels to stay competitive and urged the Council not to increase the TOT; Amish Desai — Grandview Hotel, said he had raised rates since purchasing the property four years ago and tax to the City had increased; said he was opposed to raising the TOT; Carla Merriman — Executive Director, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and Visitors' Bureau, presented a copy of the Chamber's 2004 marketing campaign and explained details of the large number of potential tourists reached; urged the Council not to place a measure on the ballot to possibly raise the TOT; and City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11681 Roger Bacon — Hermosa Beach, spoke against raising taxes and in favor of increasing revenue instead, saying he knew the City was in a tight situation; said a Suzuki franchise is available if there was a place in the City to put it and wished that a committeecould be established to implement that. The public hearing closed at 8:20 p.m: Action: To decide against placing a measure on the November 2005 ballot to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) and a measure on the November 2005 ballot to increase the Business License Tax. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. Further Action: To declare funds in the Loma Improvement Fund in the amount of $99,877 plus any interest earned in 2005-06 as surplus and direct that the funds be credited to the assessment or returned if paid in full. Motion Edgerton, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. Further Action: (1) To direct staff to prepare documents to increase development fees for Park Recreation In Lieu and Fire Flow, including a CPI increase, with direction to staff to automatically adjust per CPI on the master fee schedule each subsequent year; and (2) to postpone consideration of development fees for Sewer Connection until a later time. Motion Edgerton, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. Further Action: To approve the contracts listed in the staff report, except City Prosecutor, . for which staff was directed to request proposals, for services budgeted in the 2005-06 Budget. Motion Edgerton, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. Further Action: - To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 05-9396, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006." Motion Edgerton, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. (2) ADOPTION OF 2005-2006 APPROPRIATION LIMIT. from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated June 2, 2005. Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and Council questions. Memorandum responded to City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11682 • • The public hearing opened at 8:29 p.m. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 8:29 p.m. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 05- 6397, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL. YEAR 2005- 2006." Motion Keegan, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. b. HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2005-2006. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated June 8, 2005. Public Works Director Morgan presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:31 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Patty Egerer — Hermosa Beach, asked the location of the district and for the purpose the funds would be used (Mayor Reviczky said the district covered the entire City and funds were used mostly for streetlights). The public hearing closed at 8:32 p.m. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 05- 6398, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2005 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2006 IN CONNECTION WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2005-2006." Motion Keegan, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. At 8:34 p.m., the order of the agenda went to item 4, consent calendar items removed for separate discussion. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. DEPLOYMENT OF POLICE AND FIRE PERSONNEL FOR THE FOURTH OF JULY HOLIDAY. Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin and Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated June 2, 2005. Police Chief Lavin presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11683 Action: To receive and file the report. Motion Tucker, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. b. AMBULANCE TRANSPORT PROGRAM. Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated June 9, 2005. Fire Chief Tingley presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve staff recommendation to: (1) Continue with the City's own ambulance transport program; (2) Increase the ambulance transportation billing rate to the recommended User Fee Study of $773 for both residents and non-residents; (3) Authorize the purchase of two new ambulances; (4) Authorize the third -party billing services of Wittman Enterprises; and (5) Revisit additional staffing request after one full year of experience with new rates and billing services. Motion Edgerton, second Keegan. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. c. NATURAL HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN. Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated June 7, 2005. Fire Chief Tingley presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this issue was: Carolyn Harshman — Emergency Planning Consultants, said an example of mitigation was retrofitting state-owned bridges and overpasses after the 1984 San Francisco earthquake, thereby probably saving many lives; said the Hermosa Beach mitigation team had come up with suggestions for the City, including improving the emergency operation center at the Community Center. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 05- 6399, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE NATURAL HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN." Motion Keegan, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. d. ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING NOISE FROM COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ON PIER PLAZA. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 9, 2005. City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11684 • • City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 05-1251, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING NOISE FROM COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." Motion Keegan, second Mayor Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. e. REQUEST TO CONSENT TO ASSIGN THE FIBER OPTIC CABLE EASEMENT FROM TYCO TELECOMMUNICATIONS (US) INC. TO VSNL TELECOMMUNICATIONS (US) INC. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 9, 2005. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the assignment of the Fiber Optic Cable Easement to VSNL Telecommunications (US) Inc. and direct the City Manager to execute the assignment document. Motion Edgerton, second Keegan. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. LETTER PROPOSAL FROM TREYSPAN INC. EXPRESSING. AN INTEREST IN OBTAINING A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE A WIRELESS BROADBAND SERVICE TO THE CITY. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 9, 2005. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to addressing the Council on this issue was: Mike Paley — Treyspan, Inc., said the equipment would be Strix, which is what the City already has; said the speed would start at DSL and move toward cable, with similar pricing plans, about $20. to $40 per month; detailed his experience in telecommunications, working for cable and wireless providing services to the media, spending the last year building his company; said he had chosen Hermosa Beach as one of the cities to prove their business model and hoped for future expansion in other areas; said he was a lifetime resident of Hermosa Beach, had seen the struggle to develop WiFi, and thought the citizens would like a service like this; said there would be no degradation because wireless; described the size (about 14x12x14"), appearance, City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11685 and number of locations required. (City Manager Burrell said there was an example of the equipment on a real, estate building at the corner of Pier and Monterey). Action: To approve staff recommendation to direct staff to negotiate a non- exclusive franchise agreement and return with the franchise agreement for approval. Motion Edgerton, second Tucker. The motion carried, noting the absence of Yoon. 8 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - None 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on May 24, 2005. 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 a. Property: 552 11th Place, APN: 4187-020-044 Negotiating Parties: Stephen Burrell & Stephen Grossman Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment. 3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Stephen Burrell Employee Organizations: Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association Teamsters Union, Local 911 Professional and Administrative Employee Group Hermosa Beach Management Association Hermosa Beach Police Management Association Unrepresented employees 4. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Government Code Section 54957 Title: CITY MANAGER ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION — The Regular Meeting of the. City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, June 12, 2005, at the hour of 9:58 p.m. to a closed session. City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11686 • . RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION — The Closed Session convened on Tuesday, June 14, 2005, at the hour of 10:13 p.m. At the hour of 10:43 p.m., the Closed Session adjourned to the Regular Meeting. ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS — There were no decisions made requiring a public announcement. ADJOURNMENT — The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned, on Tuesday, June 14, 2005, at the hour of 10:44 p.m. to the Regular Meeting on Tuesday, June 28, 2005, at the hour of 7:10 p.m. Depu City Clerk p9A3 co City Council Minutes 06-14-05 Page 11687 vchlist 06/2312005 3:11:39PM Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 1 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 31742 6/23/2005 00137 HERMOSA ESCROW COMPANY 40056 -VHA 40754 6/23/2005 13264 ADEN, SANDRA • 40755 6/23/2005 11437 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CO -OI 182288 182728 1202-17289 40756 6/23/2005 12066 AIT •40757 6/23/2005 11837 AJILON OFFICE 40758 6/23/2005 06827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 40759 6/23/2005 12567 ALLIANCE STREETWORKS,INC. 5954 5986 5987 5990 T000070825 4803 PURCHASE OF STORAGE LOT AT 552 11TH. P 109-8639-5501 109-3431 109-2119 Total : 4,107,463.50 -3,341.14 -27,012.00 4,077,110.36 2004 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 TAXI VOUCHER PROGRAM/4/05 145-3404-4201 TAXI VOUCHER PROGRAM/5/05 145-3404-4201 Toner Cartridges/6/05 715-1206-4309 Printer Cartridges/6/05 001-2101-4305 Ink Cartridges/5/05 001-2101-4305 Ink Cartridges/6/05 715-1206-4309 Temporary Services/5/30-6/02/05 001-1202-4201 Total : Total : Total : CROSSING GUARD SERVICES/5%29-6/11/05 001-2102-4201 207 STREET IMPROVEMENTS/APRIL 05 301-8108-4201 Total : 3,597.90 3,478.80 7,076.70 414.61 347.96 80.14 208.84 1,051.55 629.44 629.44 3,110.49 3,110.49 166,442.00 2b vchlist Check Register Page: 2 06/23/2005 3:11:39PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40759 6/23/2005 12567 ALLIANCE STREETWORKS,INC. (Continued) Total : 166,442.00 40760 6/23/2005 13261 ALSHATHIR, JASMINE 1204-17287 Citation Refund/Hearing/1405011249 110-3302 25.00 Total : 25.00 0761 6/23/2005 12796 AMERICAN LA FRANCE OF ES5249 REPAIRS TO ENGINE 13 715-2201-4311 ES5342 REPAIRS TO ENGINE 13 715-2201-4311 40762 6/23/2005 07286 BARNETT, DOROTHY 1202-17291 2004 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 40763 6/23/2005 13221 BEACH CITY ROCKS, LLC 4601-0463 Summer Excursion/20 Campers 001-4601-4308 40764 6/23/2005 08482 BOUND TREE MEDICAL,LLC 50117095 Medical Supplies/6/6/05 001-2201-4309 50118998 • Medical Supplies/6/05 001-2201-4309 • 40765 6/23/2005 09759 BROOKES ELECTRIC COMPANY 21815 40766 6/23/2005 00262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 52911 Total : Total : Total : Total : INSTALL CIRCUITS & OUTLETS/PD LOCKERS 153-2106-5601 Name Plates For Fire Dept. 001-2201-4305 40767 6/23/2005 04715 COLEN AND LEE 2242 Liability Claims Admin/5/05 705-1209-4201 Total : Total : Total : 3,924.63 385.27 4,309.90 24.61 24.61 260.00 260.00 81.60 12.13 93.73 2,408.25 2,408.25 55.76 55.76 1,000.00 1,000.00 Page: 2 vchlist Check Register Page: 3 06123/2005 3:11:39PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor. Invoice 40768 6/23/2005 09614 CONTINENTAL MAPPING SERVICE 61005 40769 6/23/2005 07809 CORPORATE EXPRESS • 40770 6/23/2005 09461 CUSTOM TROPHY 40771 6/23/2005 .04689 DATA TICKET, INC. 40772 6/23/2005 12991 DELL COMPUTERS 61938482 61938490 93327 11864 E9075560 E92999354 40773 6/23/2005 09823 DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTAN 4202-17302 •40774 6/23/2005 00122 DUNCAN PARKING TECHNOLOGIE: 23830 40775 6/23/2005 11034 EKLUND'S BLAST OFF 502135 Description/Account 300' NOTICING/June 05 001-4101-4201 Office Supplies/6/05 001-4601-4308 Office Supplies/6/05 001-1208-4305 Amount Total : Total : DOG PARADE RIBBONS & SOFTBALL TROPHY 001-4601-4308 DMV Record Retrieval/5/05 110-1204-4201 PORTABLE COMPUTER/PERSONNEL 715-1206-5402 PORTABLE COMPUTER/PERSONNEL 715-1206-5402 EPA Manifest Fee 715-4206-4251 Total : Total Total : Total : TICKET WRITER HAND HELD COMPUTERS 715-3302-5402 Return Of Handhelds For Trade -In 715-3302-5402 3851 DOWNTOWN STEAM CLEANING 109-3301-4201 109-3304-4201 Total : 2,994.00 2,994.00 81.57 310.27 391.84 345.86 345.86 217.63 217.63 2,253.03 80.49 2,333.52 211.00 211.00 3,247.50 -541.25 2,706.25 3,540.00 225.00 3 Page: 3 vchlist Check Register 06/23/2005 3:11:39PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 4 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40775 6/23/2005 11034 EKLUND'S BLAST OFF (Continued) Total : 3,765.00 40776 6/23/2005 01962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 3-82386102 Express Mail/May 05 001-1203-4305 20.48 001-1101-4305 18.48 160-3102-4201 31.74 • 3-870-83984 Express Mail/6/05 001-2101-4305 18.89 001-1121-4305 25.51 001-4202-4201 41.17 Total : 156.27 40777 6/23/2005 07292 GALLUP, VIRGINIA G. 1202-17290 2004 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 40778 6/23/2005 12714 GOLF N' STUFF 4601-04157 Day Camp Excursion//6/24/05 001-4601-4308 690.00 Total : 690.00 40779 6/23/2005 02102 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 032060121 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT/PIER/3/05 001-8630-4201 37,050.00 032060122 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT/PIER/4/05 301-8630-4201 30,270.00 • Total : 67,320.00 40780 6/23/2005 06518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. 2394 Plan Checks/6/05 001-4201-4201 9,958.61 122-8630-4201 900.00 2395 Plan Checks/6/05 001-4201-4201 11,658.06 Total : 22,516.67 40781 6/23/2005 04108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, INC 062005 Worker's Comp Claims/6/17/05 705-1217-4324 4,087.54 Total : 4,087.54 40782 6/23/2005 09657 INFOLINK SCREENING SERVICES 171729 Pre- Employment Background Check/6/05 Page: 4 y vchlist Check Register Page: 5 06/23/2005 3:11:39PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40782 6/23/2005 09657 INFOLINK SCREENING SERVICES (Continued) 001-1203-4201 31.80 Total : 31.80 40783 6/23/2005 11616 JOHNSON, KIMBERLY 4601-04211 Instructor Payment/9403 001=4601-4221 Total : •40784 6/23/2005 07859 LACMTA 6050438 Bus Pass Sales June 2005 145-3403-4251 Total : 40785 6/23/2005 12771 LARRY WOLF/ARNOLD GOLDSTEIN 1202-17314 1 Year Rent & Electricity/WIFI 04/05 715-1206-5402 Total : 40786 6/23/2005 13082 LEAt PLUMBING, KEN 9999-17.318 50% Deposit/Shower Renovation/Fire 6/05 180-8610-4201 Total : 40787 6/23/2005 13220 LOS ANGELES GALAXY 5/17/2005 Summer Camp Excursion/7/13/05 001-1550 Total 40788 6/23/2005 06514 MAXIMUS, INC. 1010134 STATE MANDATED COST CLAIMS REPORTINC 001-1202-4201 Total : .40789 6/23/2005 13266 PERKINS, ARNOLD 1202-17288 2004 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 Total : 40790 6/23/2005 11539 PROSUM TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 14593 Consulting Services/May 2005 715-1206-4201 Total : 40791 6/23/2005 08837 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF 93299 Fuel Purchase/April 05 6,137.60 6,137.60 240.00 240.00 36.00 36.00 2,840.50 2,840.50 150.00 150.00 975.00 975.00 24.61 24.61 500.00 500.00 Page: 5 vchlist Check Register 06/23/2005 3:11:39PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 6 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40791 6/23/2005 08837 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF (Continued) 715-3302-4310 66.45 715-2201-4310 672.60 715-3102-4310 0.24 715-4204-4310 41.16 715-4201-4310 38.99 . 715-4202-4310 6.68 Total : 826.12 40792 6/23/2005 05379 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON 139450 Legal Re: General/4/05 001-1131-4201 42.00 Total : 42.00 40793 6/23/2005 03726 RUSHER AIR CONDITIONING 105976 A/C Repairs/5/05 001-4204-4201 168.00 Total : 168.00 40794 6/23/2005 09402 S&S WORLDWIDE 4945511 PROGRAM SUPPLIES/SUMMER CAMP 001-4601-4308 775.07 Total : 775.07 40795 6/23/2005 03353 S.B.C.U. VISA 05/11/2005 Credit For Over Limit Fee Charged/5/05 001-1203-4201 -10.00 2201-17127 Aluminum Binders • 3001 001-2201-4317 128.96 Air Fare/Police Witness/6/2005 001-2101-4317 660.80 3066 Air Fare/J. Gomez 6/23-6/25/05 001-2201-4317 173.90 3503 Travel Expense/J Reviczky 001-1201-4317 15.11 5812 Interview Panel Lunch/5/11/05 001-1203-4201 208.48 5814 Lunch/ Training For Wildland Fire Class 001-2201-4317 139.00 001-1201-4317 45.00 Page: 6 vchlist - Check Register Page: 7 06/23/2005 3:11:39PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40795 6/23/2005 03353 S.B.C.U. VISA 40796 6/23/2005 12924 SAPHONY. 50797 6/23/2005 00321 SBC (Continued) 7996 060105 331 254-6071 333 267-6155 333 267-6160 333 267-6161 333 267-6164 333 267-6165 40798 6/23/2005 13267 SC ESCROW SERVICES INC. 05-15487N •40799 6/23/2005 01046 SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE ACCOU T454577 40800 6/23/2005 09737 SOLYMOSI; MARIE 290334 290341 733607 Employment Ad 001-1203-4201 Web Site Maint/5/1/05-5/31/05 715-1206-4201 Circuit Billing/6/05 001-2101-4304 T-1 Circuit Billing/6/05 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/6/05 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/6/05 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/June 05 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/June 05 001-2101-4304 Reimb Property Tax Credit/#05-15487N 109-3901 Small Tools And Shop Vac/6/05 001-2201-4309 Bee Removal/5/29/05 110-3302-4201 Bee Removal/6/03/05 110-3302-4201 Bee Removal/6/13/05 110-3302-4201 75.00 Total : 1,436.25 Total : 720.00 720.00 57.92 189.22 59.72 59.72 50.93 50.93 Total : 468.44 159.44 Total : 159.44 151.47 Total : 151.47 85.00 85.00 85.00 Page: 7 vchlist Check Register Page: 8 06/23/2005 3:11:39PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40800 6/23/2005 09737 SOLYMOSI, MARIE (Continued) Total : 255.00 40801 6/23/2005 09955 SOUTH BAY PIPELINE 1004 REBUILD MANHOLE -8TH. CRT & HERMOSA A' 160-3102-4201 4,900.00 Total : 4,900.00 .0802 6/23/2005 08812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC CO 200405517 POWER INVERTER/INSTALL 150-2113-5401 427.59 Total : 427.59 40803 6/23/2005 09000 THOMAS, MARIA 1202-17309 2004 ASSESSMENT REBATE 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 40804 6/23/2005 00124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY S2762901.001 Plumbing Supplies/6/05 160-3102-4309 175.40 Total : 175.40 40805 6/23/2005 09364 TOYS R US E00009583 Supplies Teen Program/6/05 001-4601-4308 188.02 Total : 188.02 40806 6/23/2005 11035 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2454371798 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE/5/05 001-6101-4201 13,615.67 105-2601-4201 675.00 0 109-3301-4201 250.00 001-6101-4201 850.00 2454371799 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE/5/05 105-2601-4201 2,500.00 109-3301-4201 900.00 Total : 18,790.67 40807 6/23/2005 11209 UC REGENTS 05060106 40808 6/23/2005 10785 UNITED STORM WATER, INC. SW17665 CONTINUING EDUCATION/06/05 001-2201-4201 Total : 1,736.44 1,736.44 STORM DRAIN & CATCH BASIN CLEANING/5/0 160-3102-4201 3,420.00 Page: 8 vchlist Check Register Page: 9 0612312005 3:11:39PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40808 6/23/2005 10785 UNITED STORM WATER, INC. (Continued) Total : 3,420.00 40809 6/23/2005 00135 XEROX CORPORATION 010192325 Copier Maintenance /May 05 715-2101-42.01 160.58 Total : 160.58 • 57 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 4,417,143.20 57 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 4,417,143.20 Page: 9 vchlist Check Register 06/30/2005 3:11:35PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 1 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40810 6/30/2005 12796 AMERICAN LA FRANCE OF 14894 FIRE TRUCK REPAIRS/5/05 715-2201-4311 3,655.78 ES5168 EMERGENCY REPAIR TO ENGINE 11 715-2201-4311 492.65 • ES5256 REPAIRS/ENGINE 11/MAY 05 715-2201-4311 563.21 ES5268 REPLACE ENGINE 13 HEADLINER 715-2201-4311 467.85 ES5341 FIRE DEPARTMENT APPARATUS MAINT 715-2201-4201 656.60 Total : 5,836.09 40811 6/30/2005 12837 ANDRADE, CAROL 4601-04196 Instructor Payment/#9531 001-4601-4221 105.00 Total : 105.00 40812 6/30/2005 05179 AT&T 019 360 8382 001 Long Distance Charges/6/17-6/15/05 001-1121-4304 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 715-1206-4304 Total : 40813 6/30/2005 00407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY 29432 Door Repairs/6/05 0.79 0.34 0.52 2.47 8.40 8.54 0.79 54.58 95.57 17.94 15.48 25.63 12.34 10.09 0.25 2.56 256.29 Page: 1 vchlist Check Register 06130/2005 3:11:35PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 2 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40813 6/30/2005 00407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY (Continued) 001-4204-4201 65.00 Total : 65.00 40814 6/30/2005 09836 BAIERSKI, MARGUERITE L. 4601-04198 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/#9417-9499 001-4601-4221 3,125.50 Total : 3,125.50 0815 6/30/2005 12387 BARTEL ASSOCIATES, LLC 05-140 VALUATION OF RETIREE HEALTHCARE/ARP-I1 001-1203-4201 4,450.00 Total : 4,450.00 40816 6/30/2005 09104 BLENDER, TRACY 4601-04192 Instructor Payment/#9397 0.01-4601-422.1 1,785.00 Total : 1,785.00 40817 6/30/2005 11076 BOSSONIS, ANDRONIKI 4601-04217 Instructor Payment/9664 001-4601-4221 966.00 Total : 966.00 40818 6/30/2005 11518 BOTHE, DENISE May 17,2005 Planning Transcriptions/5/17/05 001-4101-4201 390.00 Total : 390.00 40819 • 6/30/2005 08344 BOUMA, SHANE 4601-04207 Hockey Program Assistant/5/1-6/5/05 001-4601-4201 171.00 Total : 171.00 •40820 6/30/2005 ' 08482 BOUND TREE MEDICAL,LLC 50119738 Medical Supplies/6/05 001-4601-4308 318.26 Total : 318.26 40821 6/30/2005 12100 BROWN, CHRISTOPHER KYLE 4601-04212 Instructor'Payment/#10184 001-4601-4221 2,163.00 Total : 2,163.00 40822 6/30/2005 07109 BURT, ADAM 4601-04193 Instructor Payment/#9508 001-4601-4221 294.00 Page: 2 vchlist Check Register Page: 3 06/30/2005 3:11:35PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40822 6/30/2005 07109 BURT, ADAM (Continued) 4601-04213 Instructor Payment/#10181 001-4601-4221 917.00 Total : 1,211.00 40823 6/30/2005 03372 CA EMS PERSONNEL FUND 2201-17329 Paramedic License Renewal/D. Powers IP 001-2201-4317 130.00 Total : 130.00 40824 6/30/2005 08338 CALIF.MFG. INFORMATION SYSTEA 120518 Tiburon Systems Consulting/6/05 715-2101-4201 1,372.91 120519 VIDEO SYSTEMS CONSULTING/6/05 153-2106-5402 4,992.17 Total : 6,365.08 40825 6/30/2005 12120 CATALINA CHANNEL EXPRESS 4601-04210 Excursion/7/09/05 001-1550 1,874.00 Total : 1,874.00 40826 6/30/2005 06307 CHASE, MARGARET 4601-04216 Instructor Payment/#9504 001-4601-4221 885.50 Total : 885.50 ' 40827 6/30/2005 08533 CMTA 9999-17340 Registration/Workman & Ghassemi • 001-1550 150.00 Total : 150.00 40828 6/30/2005 05595 COACH USA 121299 Transportation/6/11/05/Dodger Game 145-3409-4201 548.47 Total : 548.47 40829 6/30/2005 07809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 62044964 Office Supplies/June 05 001-4601-4308 62.82 Total : 62.82 40830 6/30/2005 10974 COYTE, SANDRA 108217 Rental Deposit Refund 001-2111 500.00 Page: 3 vchlist Check Register Page: 4 06/30/2005 3:11:35PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40830 6/30/2005 10974 COYTE, SANDRA' (Continued) Total: ' 500.00 40831 6/30/2005 12960 EMERGENCY PLANNING CONSULT 1 Development of Hazard Mitigation Plan 001-2201-4201 30,000.00 Total : 30,000.00 40832 6/30/2005 07853 EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING & EQUIP 6761 VIDEO SEWER SYSTEM/PARK AVE/6/05 160-3102-4201 500.00 Total : 500.00 •0833 6/30/2005 12729 ENFACT SOLUTIONS, INC: 1043 ADMIN OF STORMWATER PROGRAM/4/05 160-3102-4201 5,015.00 1046 ADMIN OF STORMWATER PROGRAM/5/05 160-3102-4201 5,695.00 Total : 10,710.00 40834 6/30/2005 10668 EXXON MOBIL FLEET/GECC, ACCT 7678297 Gas Card Usage/5/10-6/09/05 715-2101-4310 ' 4,107.48 715-2201-4310 406.68 715-4201-4310 148.86 715-4202-4310 132.23 715-6101-4310 247.59 715-3302-4310 472.25 715-3104-4310 444.14 715-4601-4310. 135.37 715-2601-4310 182.17 715-3102-4310 157.51 001-1250 36.49 Total: ,6,470.77 40835 6/30/2005 13265 FEDORCHUK, MARY ANNE 1202-17292 2004 Assessment Rebate 105-3105 40836 6/30/2005 07910 FOSTER-GORDON MANUFACTURII 512.24 Presentation Folders 001-1101-4319 Total : 24.61 24.61 512.24 Total : 512.24 Page: 4 13 vchlist Check Register Page: 5 06/30/2005 3:11:35PM CITY. OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40837 6/30/2005 06518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. 2396 Plan Checks/6/05 001-4201-4201 1,602.47 Total : 1,602.47 40838 6/30/2005 04108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, INC 06/28/05 Worker's Comp Claims/6/24/05 705-1217-4324 7,675.66 • Total : 7,675.66 40839 6/30/2005 09900 HEIDMAN, CHARLES 1141-17322 Damage Deposit Refund/1126 8th Street 001-2110 1,500.00 Total : 1,500.00 40840 6/30/2005 09130 HRBOKA, DENNIS 4601-04199 Instructor Payment/#9643 001-4601-4221 1,225.00 4601-04219 Instructor Payment/#9642 001-4601-4221 1,225.00 Total : 2,450.00 40841 6/30/2005 11861 IMPERIAL RADIATOR, INC. 232021 Heater Core/6/05 715-2101-4311 53.35 Total 53.35 40842 6/30/2005 02458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTF 202866-00 Electrical Supplies/June 05 121-8630-4201 446.25 • 001-2021 8.40 001-2022 -8.40 202889-00 Electrical Supplies/Booking Rm/6/05 001-4204-4309 86.37 001-2021 1.63 001-2022 -1.63 Total : 532.62 40843 6/30/2005 12151 JAHNG, CHRISTOPHER Y. 4601-04206 Instructor Payment/#9631 001-4601-4221 700.00 Total : 700.00 40844 6/30/2005 12901 JAZZY GYM, INC 4601-04215 Instructor Payment/#9479 001-4601-4221 1,225.00 Lt Page: 5 vchlist Check Register 06130/2005 3:11:35PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 6 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40844 6/30/2005 12901 JAZZY GYM, INC (Continued) Total : 1,225.00 40845 6/30/2005 10334 JENSEN, GLENN 4601-04220 Instructor Payment/#9670 001-4601-4221 840.00 Total : 840.00 40846 6/30/2005 11173 JNJ BALLOONS & NOVELTIES 75853100 Balloon Purchase/6/05 001-4601-4308 65.06 • Total : 65.06 40847 6/30/2005 05356 JOHN L. HUNTER. & ASSOC. HBBCR0505 ADMIN BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING/5 150-3102-4201 48.75 HB000505 ADMINISTRATION/USED OIL PROGRAM/MAY C 160=3105-4201 92.75 Total : 141.50 40848 6/30/2005 12614 KRUG, LAURA 4601-04194 Instructor Payment/#9426 001-4601-4221 273.00 Total : 273.00 40849 6/30/2005 12877 LA COUNTY EMS AGENCY 2201-17311 Paramedic. Accreditation/S. Ward 001-2201-4317 265.00 Total : 265.00 40850 6/30/2005 00167 LEARNED LUMBER B961036 Building Supplies/Fort Lots Of Fun/6/05 125-8534-4201 9.27 Total : 9.27 .40851 6/30/2005 02175 LIEBERT, CASSIDY WHITMORE 56584 Legal Re: Interrogation/5/05 001-1203-4201 6,917.62 57074 Legal Re: General/5/05 001-1203-4201 ' 1,016.86 57079 Legal Re: Personnel Issues/5/05 001-1203-4201 5,257.13 Total : 13,191.61 40852 6/30/2005 08445 LITTLE CO OF MARY HOSPITAL Q0146575367 Blood Alcohol Draw/6/05 001-2101-4201 35.00 5 Page: 6 vchlist Check Register Page: 7 06/30/2005 3:11:35PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40852 6/30/2005 08445 LITTLE CO OF MARY HOSPITAL (Continued) Total : 35.00 40853 6/30/2005 08836 LONG BEACH AQUARIUM OF PACIF 4601-04156 Summer Camp Excursion/7/06/05 001-1550 214.80 Total : 214.80 .854 6/30/2005 10681 MAYNOR, DONALD H. DHM 2936 LEGAL SERVICES RE: UUT AUDIT 001-1202-4201 1,250.00 Total : 1,250.00 40855 6/30/2005 10324 MBIA MUNI SERVICES COMPANY INV -10350 UUT COMPLIANCE SERVICES/4 TH QTR 001-1202-4201 1,561.17 Total : 1,561.17 40856 6/30/2005 09432 MCMASTER CARR 24616773 Electrical Supplies/Booking Room/6/05 153-2106-5601 257.85 Total : 257.85 40857 6/30/2005 01911 MEDICAL INSTITUTE 521494 Pre -Employment Physicals/5/05 001-1203-4320 140.00 Total : 140.00 40858 6/30/2005 07144 MILLER, LEON C. 4202-17325 Permit Refund/6059 001-3815 53.00 Total : 53.00 00859 6/30/2005 10098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 371554311-043 Cell Phone Usage/5/22-6/21/05 001-2201-4304 341.16 Total : 341.16 40860 6/30/2005 04142 OFFICE DEPOT 293224374-001 Summer Blast Program Supplies 001-4601-4308 213.78 Total : 213.78 40861 6/30/2005 10139 PARKING CONCEPTS INC. 284 0505 OPERATING EXPENSES/PK STRUCTURE/05/0; 109-3304-4231 13,224.54 285 0505 OPERATION EXPENSES/LOT A/5/05 109-3305-4231 11, 346.75 I(D Page: 7 vchlist Check Register Page: 8 06/30/2005 3:11:35PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40861 6/30/2005 10139 PARKING CONCEPTS INC. 40862 6/30/2005 13268 POPE, LISA 40863 6/30/2005 12006. RAMIREZ, RAQUEL •40864 6/30/2005 05379 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON 139746 (Continued) 05060501 4601-04195 40865 6/30/2005 09656 SHRED IT CALIFORNIA 40866 6/30/2005 09811 SIGLER, WILLIAM E. 40867 6/30/2005 10532 ' SOUTH BAY FORD • 40868 6/30/2005 12930 SPANGLER, DANIELE 40869 6/30/2005 00124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 333386312 4601-04200 4601-04205 64796 64808 4601-04191 Transcription Services/3/05-4/26/05 001-1121-4201 Instructor Payment/#9527 001-4601-4221 Legal Re: General/5/05 001-1131-4201 Shredding Services/6/05 001-2101-4201 Instructor Payment/#9601 001-4601-4221 Instructor Payment/#9631 001-4601-4221 Auto Part Purchase/June 05 715-2101-4311 Auto Parts Purchase/6/05 715-4204-4311 Instructor Payment/#9535 001-4601-4221 S2784560.001 FAUCETS/VALLEY PARK/6/05 001-6101-4309 Total : Total : Total : Total : 24,571.29 862.50 862.50 273.00 273.00 56.90 56.90 95.00 Total : 95.00 1,396.50 700.00 Total : 2,096.50 35.34 153.74 Total : 189.08 1,025.50 Total : 1,025.50 296.17 296.17 Total : Page: vchlist Check Register 06/3012005 3:11:35PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 9 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40870 6/30/2005 09364 TOYS R US E00010044 Program Supplies/Teen Program/6/05 001-4601-4308 174.02 E00010045 Program Supplies/Teen Room/6/05 001-4601-4308 21.63 J00056858 Summer Blast Supplies/6/05 • 001-4601-4308 199.42 Total : 395.07 40871 6/30/2005 09374 U.S. ARMOR 35490 VEST & BODY ARMOR/ARSON INVESTIGATOR 001-2201-5401 801.95 Total : 801.95 40872 6/30/2005 08097 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 173531 Safekeeping Fees/May 05 001-1141-4201 291.67 Total : 291.67 40873 6/30/2005 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 310 167-1756 Phone Billing/6/16-7/16/05 001-1550 132.56 001-2101-4304 132.56 310 372-6373 Phone Charqes/June 05 110-3302-4304 33.58 372-6186 FAX BILLING/5/11-6/7/05 001-1101-4304 8.53 001-1121-4304 1.87 • 001-1202-4304 8.67 001-1550 16.30 PLO -0346 Circuit Billing/June 05 001-2101-4304 41.77 PLO -0347 Circuit Billing/June 05 001-2101-4304 41.77 Total : 417.61 40874 6/30/2005 08767 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 809182620 California Code Updates/5/21-6/20/05 001-1121-4201 129.90 Total : 129.90 40875 6/30/2005 01206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 0077263 Replacement Signs/6/05 18 Page: 9 • vchlist Check Register Page: 10 06/30/2005 3:11:35PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 40875 6/30/2005 01206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES (Continued) 001-3104-4309- 228.07 0077368 Speed Limit Signs/6/05 001-3104-4309 399:44 0077385 Steel Plate Ahead Signs/6/05 001-3104-4.309 208.00 Total : 835.51 • 66 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 146,504.58 66 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 146,504.58 "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages �/ to) 19 inclusive, of the check register for TA — Q3 0 lOsgZcurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." Date Finance Director ?/,5/p C t9 Page: 10 • July 7, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council • oe'e-e/i(J-u 7/P/c's Regular Meeting of July 12, 2005 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS U`LY 26 2005 J. , User Fee Study Finance Director Public Hearing: Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a General Plan amendment from CC, Commercial Corridor, to MD, Medium Density residential, and zone change from spa7, Specific Plan Area No. 7, to R-2, two- family residential, to allow the development of up to two residential units, and adoption of an environmental negative declaration at 722 1st Street. (Continued from meetings of may 24, 2005 and June 28, 2005) Community Development Director Revised Outdoor Dining Standards & Procedures Community Development Director Public Works Director Review of the tree ordinance Public Works Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of June 15, 2005. Public Works Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of July 5, 2005. Community Resources Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of July 19, 2005. Community Development Director Activity Reports for June 2005 .. All Departments AUGUST 2005 Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of July 20, 2005. Public Works Director NO MEETING SEPTEMBER 13, 2005 Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of August 2, 2005. Community Resources Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of August 16, 2005. Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of August 17, 2005. Public Works Director Activity Reports for July 2005 All Departments 2c Honorable Mayor and Members • 7/d-/-05 July 5, 2005 For the City Council Meeting of the City Council of July 12, 2005 ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council accept donations received by the City to be used as follows: Friends of the Parks ChevonTexaco espectfully submitted: Valerie Mohler Accounting Supervisor $5,000.00 To be used for the Lawnbowling Green renovation (as approved by the City Council on June 14, 2005). $8,000.00 To be used for the Chevron Surf Camp (FY 04-05). Concur: Viki Copeland Finance Director ,, Std •hen Burrell. C Manager 2d • Vid/05 June 30, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 12, 2005 NOTICE OF CLOSED CLAIMS The City has resolved and closed the following claims: 1. Claimant : Rodriguez, Marco Date of Loss : 06-03-05 Date Filed : 06-06-05 Damage : Vehicle damage Disposition : Claim paid $1,695.83 2. Claimant : Reiff, Scott Date of Loss : 03-05-05 Date Filed : 05-11-05 Damage : Vehicle damage Disposition : Claim paid $886.59 A copy of these claims are on file with the City Clerk's office. ubmitted, Mi • ael A. Earl, Director St- phen R. Burrell P-rsonnel & Risk Man- •ement Concur: City Manager July 7, 2005 City Council Meeting July 12, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council EXTENSION OF CONTRACT FOR PUBLICATION OF LEGAL, ADVERTISING Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached three-year contract for legal publications with the Easy Reader newspaper. Background: The current advertising contract with the Easy Reader expired on June 30, 2005. It had been extended for three years in 1999 and again in 2002, based on the City Attorney's legal opinion that since the Easy Reader is an adjudicated newspaper of general circulation published in the Hermosa Beach, the City may not use a newspaper published outside the city for its legal publications; and, further, since the Easy Reader is the only newspaper ofgeneral circulation published in the city, the City may contract for terms longer than one year. The Easy Reader has maintained an excellent working relationship with the City and has agreed to an extension of contract for three years. The negotiated rates for the first year are $9.50 per column inch for both legal and display ads and. $9 per column inch for subsequent insertions, which are the same rates the City has paid for the past six years. In the event the City requests a display notice to be placed in the editorial section of the newspaper (which so far we have never needed to do), the rate would be $27 per column inch. The Easy Reader has proposed a possible annual increase equal to the CPI for the second and third year of the contract. (See attached letter from the Easy Reader.) Elaine Doerfling, City Cl Noted: Stephen R u "11, City ager 2f • • Easy Reader SOUTH BAY'S WEEKLY" • lmsuiA PEOPLE South BayPeople PALOS VERDES PENINSULA MONTHLY LitcstyleS of the Bich 'Cities 5/15/2005 To: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach From: Kevin Cody, publisher, Easy Reader Re: Legal notices publication Following is Easy Reader's bid for publication of legal notices for the City of Hermosa Beach. The rates have not been increased since prior to 2000. Dates: July 2005 through July 2008 Column inch rate First insertion: $9.50 Second insertion: $9 Specifications: 7 pica wide column 6 point type Boxed legal ads: same as above Display notices or ads (Editorial section of the newspaper, 12.5 pick wide columns): $27/column inch Rates may be adjusted upward by an amount equal to the CPI. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. P.O. lo4 427 • 433 Hcrnnosii Ave., licrinusa kicacii. CA • 90254.L0427 • (310) 372-4611 • Pax (310) 318-6292 Email: easyreaclrrriea yrcader.ito to 3Jad ?agrtHg?I A CHS 7[700 TOOTC rr •7T rnn, /r 1. lrr.• CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONTRACT FOR SERVICES NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION OF ALL CITY ADVERTISING THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 12th day of July, 2005 by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "City," and the EASY READER NEWSPAPER, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor." ARTICLE 1. TERM OF CONTRACT Section 1.01. This agreement will be effective immediately, and will continue in effect through June 30, 2008, unless sooner terminated. ARTICLE 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR Section 2.01. Contractor agrees to perform the services specified in the "Description of Services" attached to this agreement as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. Section 2.02. Contractor agrees to furnish copy for proofing prior to publication, to furnish five free copies of all newspapers containing advertising matter, and to furnish free all affidavits of publications required by City showing the date of publication of such advertising matter, all to be submitted to the City Clerk's office. Section 2.03. All publications shall be published in the first publication of the paper published after receipt of copy, and succeeding publications, unless otherwise directed. Contractor must be responsible for the correct publication of all legal advertising and in case of error or omission (which is not according to copy as furnished by City) shall republish said matter affected thereby free of charge to City. • • ARTICLE 3. COMPENSATION Section 3.01. In consideration for the services to be performed by Contractor, City agrees to pay Contractor according to the rates as described in Exhibit "A." Contractor shall be paid as soon as possible after receipt of billing but in no event later than 30 days from said date. ARTICLE 4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT Section 4.01. This agreement shall continue in force until June 30, 2008 and shall thereupon terminate. Section 4.02: This agreement shall terminate automatically on the occurrence of any of the following events: 1) Bankruptcy or insolvency of either party; 2) Termination of City as a public entity; or 3) Assignment of this agreement by Contractor. Section 4.03. Should Contractor default in the performance of this agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate this agreement by giving written notification to Contractor. For the purpose of this section, material breach of agreement shall include, but not be limited to, the failure to perform the services described in the attached "Description of Services." Section 4.04. Should City fail to pay Contractor all or any part of the compensation set forth in Exhibit "A" of this agreement on the date due, Contractor, at Contractor's option, may terminate this agreement if the failure is not remedied by City within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due. ARTICLE 5. GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 5.01. This agreement supersedes any and all agreements, either oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the rendering of services by Contractor for City and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of such services in any manner whatsoever. Section 5.02. If any provision in this agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way. Section 5.03. If any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, which may beset by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. Section 5.04. This agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the within Agreement at Hermosa Beach, California, on the 12th day of July, 2005. ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTRACTOR: City Attorney Easy Reader 3 • • EXHIBIT "A" THREE-YEAR CONTRACT FOR SERVICES PUBLICATION OF LEGAL ADVERTISING - COLUMN AND BOXED The contractor shall print and publish in the Easy Reader Newspaper, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Hermosa Beach, all publications of advertising of all kinds required to be published by said City, for the three-year period of July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2008 at the following prices: COLUMN LEGAL ADS (7 pica wide columns, 6 point type) From and including July 1, 2005 to and including June 30, 2006 at the following prices: At the rate of $9.50 per column inch for the first insertion. At the rate of $9.00 per column inch for each subsequent insertion. From and including July 1, 2006 to and including June 30, 2007 at the following prices: Same as FY 2005-06 rates, but may be adjusted upward by an amount equal to the CPI From and including July 1, 2007 to and including June 30, 2008 at the following prices: Same as FY 2006-07 rates, but may be adjusted upward by an amount equal to the CPI BOXED LEGAL ADS (same as above) From and including July 1, 2005 to and including June 30, 2006 at the following prices: At the rate of $9.50 per column inch for the first insertion. At the rate of $9.00 per column inch for each subsequent insertion. From and including July 1, 2006 to and including June 30, 2007 at the following prices: Same as FY 2005-06 rates, but may be adjusted upward by an amount equal to the CPI From and including July 1, 2007 to and including June 30, 2008 at the following prices: Same as FY 2006-07 rates, but may be adjusted upward by an amount equal to the CPI DISPLAY NOTICE IN EDITORIAL SECTION (12.5 pica width) From and including July 1, 2005 to and including June 30, 2006 at the following price: At the rate of $27 per column inch From and including July 1, 2006 to and including June 30, 2007 at the following prices: Same as FY 2002-03 rate, but may be adjusted upward by an amount equal to the CPI From and including July 1, 2007 to and including June 30, 2008 at the following prices: Same as FY 2003-04 rate, but may be adjusted upward by an amount equal to the CPI PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, MAY 18, 2005. CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1315 VALLEY DRIVE 7:00 P.M. MINUTES REVISED The meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. 1. Roll Call Present: Commissioners Beste, DiVirgilio, Lombardo, Marinelli, Winnek (arrived 8:10) Also Present: Richard Morgan, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Michael Flaherty, Public Works Superintendent Rhea Punneo Administrative Assistant, Public Works Department Absent: Winnek 2. Flaq Salute Commissioner Beste led the flag salute. 3. Approval of Minutes: March 23, 2005 4. Public Comment None 5. Correspondence None 6. Items for Commission Consideration Please note that while items were presented out of order, they are presented in order for clarity. a. Disabled Parking Spaces Mr. Morgan presented the item, first updating all on the history of disabled parking spaces for residents in Hermosa and ending with the direction from Council at the March 22, 2005 meeting "to review all current handicapped parking spaces on residential public streets and establish a formal policy for granting these parking spaces taking into consideration such factors as whether the applicant has a garage and/or driveway; the possible requirement for Social Security Administration documentation of permanent disability, and a specific period of time for review of the continued need for a handicapped. space at each location, along with consideration for dealing with temporary disabilities." He noted that staffs recommendation is a subcommittee of Commissioners be established to look at this more closely and develop new policies for these spaces. Mr. Flaherty noted that at this time there are 21 such spaces in Hermosa, including the newest on Monterey. He also noted that he believes many of the existing spaces would not qualify during a new review. 2g General discussion among the ommissioners ensued, highlights include • There is much divisiveness over parking among neighbors; this is a very emotional subject. • If necessary, ramps could be built on private property to allow for vehicle access on one's own property. • There is a definite need for clear, consistent, fair guidelines. • Commissioners Lombardo and DiVirgilio volunteered to be on the subcommittee. • Could be embarrassing for some to be put in front of a public hearing to discuss their disabilities; would be good to make the policy so clear that only extreme cases could need to go to the public hearing level. • Look at other communities — some similar to Hermosa where parking is so dear, where density of housing is as intense. • The policy, once determined and approved by the Commission, would then go to Council for public hearing and final approval/direction to implement. • Largest complaint is about perceived misuse. The subcommittee consisting of Commissioners Lombardo and DiVirgilio will bring a report to the meeting of June 15, 2005. b. Capital Improvement Projects for FY 2005-2006 Mr. Morgan presented the item noting that they have striven to include a lot of street projects as a result of the recent Pavement Management Study. The streets rated as "Worst" in the study — 0-10 points where 0 is worst and 100 is best. He reviewed the CIP spreadsheet noting that the overall higher project cost total since the major portion of the available funding will not be going to the pier renovation. He noted that there will be several utility undergrounding projects. He added that the City would be receiving $1.9 million for their lifeguard station, which is a big part of the pier renovation. Highlights of the discussion included: • Some of the streets requiring repair will also require sewer work, work more intense than lining • The Little League wants to do,a new announcer's booth and snack bar • A project for the improvement of lighting on The Strand is included • Key to pole replacement in the downtown area fixtures is matching the existing footprint • Focusing finally on City Yard — setting stage to demo and redo in order to enhance efficiency More ADA changes are in store for the Community Center • Anticipate Pier Renovation to be complete by late August • Tree Ordinance to come back to PWC one more time before to Council • Date of Budget Workshop to be emailed to Commissioners. 7. Commissioners' Reports No reports were presented. 8. Public Works Department Reports No questions or comments. 9. Items Requested by Commissioners No reports were presented. 10. Other Matters Mr. Morgan announced that Public Works Week is this week and said how proud he is of "our men in orange." PWC Meeting 2 5/18/05 11. Public Comment • Patty Eqerer, 925 15th Place Came forward to present concerns about hydrant placement as described in the May 13th issue of the Daily Breeze and noted problems with hydrant at 1734 Prospect —'Hermosa View School — wall in right-of-way and is within 5% of fire hydrant — problem of accessibility for Fire Department. Is sure should wall wasn't done with permit. Asked if there's something in the Municipal Code with regard to distance from a STOP sign to a hydrant and feels that every hydrant should be evaluated but the hydrant next to the school is the most important. Discussion with the Commissioners included the following: 4 Could check ADA requirements 4 Hydrant locations are checked out with Fire Chief when there's a question 4 Mr. Morgan advised that there is a requirement that there be clearance for FD access. Mr. Winnek arrived at 8:10 p.m. Mr. Beste reviewed what had been discussed regarding the disabled parking policies and procedures. 12. Adjournment Commissioner Beste adjourned the meeting at 8:15 p.m. to the meeting -of June 15, 2005. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Public Works Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of May 18, 2005. Robert Beste, Chairman Richard D. Morgan, P.E., Secretary Date H:\B95\PWFILES\PW Commission\minutes\minutes 5-18-05.doc PWC Meeting 3 5/18/05 ' July 6, 2005 • 2/11/.°5 - Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council July 12, 2005 AWARD BID FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT TRANSPORT AMBULANCES RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that council: 1. Authorize the purchase in the amount of $211,087.50 to Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc. for two transport ambulances. 2. Appropriate funds from the Equipment Replacement Fund. BACKGROUND The two existing fire department ambulances are in immediate need of replacement. The fire department has researched replacement transport ambulances and has determined the current City of Los Angeles Fire Department transport ambulance specifications with a few Hermosa Beach modifications are suited for Hermosa Beach. The City of Los Angeles Fire Department currently is having ambulances built by Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc. and the fire department is in position to save the city costs by "piggy- backing" on to the existing Los Angeles City Fire Department Bid Specification. The fire department requests council to award ; a bid of $195,000 plus sales tax to Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc. for two transport ambulances to be built to the City of Los Angeles Fire Department transport ambulance specifications with Hermosa Beach modifications. FISCAL IMPACT No funds were appropriated in the 2005-06 budget pending analysis of the ambulance transport program. Funds are available in the Equipment Replacement Fund for appropriation at this time. The total cost for both ambulances including sales tax is $211,087.50. 2h Respectfully submitted, Russell Tingley Fire Chief Concur: lili See nun. ell City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director • HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL • July 12, 2005 7 /aN).5 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP NO. 060281 (C.U.P. CON NO. 03-11, PDP NO. 03-14) LOCATION: 706 MONTEREY BOULEVARD APPLICANT: LANCE LIBIANO REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map No. 060281, which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City. Clerk be directed to endorse thecertificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a two -unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No.060281 at their October 21, 2003 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4) of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any localsubdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: 1 6 So lumenfeld, 11 ire tor Community Dev lopment Department Step '' : urre City anagen F:\B95\CD\FM706Monterey.DOC Respe fully submi ed, Ro.' 'on Senior Planner 21 C©Ez, ?L. 'A5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 060281 FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 706 MONTEREY BOULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on July 12, 2005 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 03-58 adopted after hearing on October 21, 2003; E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map No.060281 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 9, and a portion of lot 8 of Tract No. 1072 as per map recorded in Book 17, Page 137 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 706 Monterey Boulevard, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 12th day of July, 2005. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY F:\B95\CD\fm706mont-rs.doc • July 5, 2005 2/J -Vas Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 12, 2005 AWARD PURCHASE OF NEW PUBLIC WORKS VEHICLE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Award the purchase of one (1) 2005 Chevrolet Silverado Truck in the amount of $27,284.87; 2. Authorize Staff to reappropriate funds from budget year 04-05 from the Equipment Replacement fund for this purchase; 3. Authorize an additional appropriation of $1,035; and 4. Authorize Staff to issue the appropriate purchase documents as required. Summary: Public Works vehicles are part of the inventory in the Vehicle Replacement Fund. The 1989 Chevrolet Astrovan used by Equipment Service Division personnel was identified in the FY 04-05 Adopted Budget as scheduled for replacement and $26,250 was allocated for this purpose. This request is for the purchase of a new truck with utility bed package to replace that Astrovan. Because this purchase was not completed in FY 04-05, staff is requesting that the funds be reappropriated at this time so that staff can make the purchase. Staff recommends that Council authorize the purchase of this vehicle from Wondries Fleet Group of Alhambra, California as they hold the sole contract (Bids #0364375 and #207488) with the County of Los Angeles. They are also the provider of many Public Works vehicles in the County fleet. Since Wondries Fleet Group has an established government contract with the County, City policy allows the purchase of equipment from a sole source vendor under these conditions. This is considered a "piggyback" purchase and is standard within the industry. Fiscal Impact: After the reappropriation of $26,250 from Equipment Replacement Fund, an additional appropriation of $1,035 is necessary to purchase the requested replacement vehicle. Attachment: Vehicle Specifications/Proposal Respectfully submitted, Richard D., Organ, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: � J Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: Steph City Manager H:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\vehicle purchase - replace astrovan 7-12-05.doc 06/23/2005 14:11 6264579953 • PAGE 01 2005 Chevrolet Silverado 250011D Reg Cab 133" WB Work Truck CC25903 VEHICLE DETAILS SELECTED MODEL - 2005 CC25903 Reg Cab 133" WB Work Truck Dsau Uon MEM ilii CC25903 2005 Chevrolet Slivered° 2500110 Reg Cab 2,831.00 •1,632.00 133" W8 Work Truck SELECTED VEHICLE COLORS - 2005 X03 Reg Cab 133" WB Work Truck ?I 35/-1•3 Interior: No color has been selected. ( 1 to 0 • Gv Exterior 1: No color has been selected. Exterior 2: No color has been selected. SELECTED OPTIONS • 2005 CC2501113 tog Cab 13r WB Work Truck V SEAT TRIM, VINYL (STD) 1SW PREFERRED EQUIPMENT GROUP Includes Standard Equipment • AE7 SEATS, FRONT 402040SPLIT-BENCH, 3 -PASSENGER, DRIVER AND PASSENGER MANUAL RECLINING WITH OUTBOARD LEAD RESTRAINTS COW • GVWR, 9200 LBS. (4173 le) (STD) (Med specify an CC25903. CIC25753, and 05743 Models) CJ3 AIR CONDITIONING, DUAL -ZONE, MAINUAl, INDAnDUAL CLIMATE SETTINGS FOR DRIVER AND RIGHT FRONT PASSENGER (STD) COOLING, INTERNAL TRANSMISSION OIL COOLER, WATER -TO - OIL. INTEGRAL TO DRIVER SIDE OF RADIATOR TANK (Included and only avaiable wNh (PATO Transmission, 4 -speed automatic, heavy -duly. - included and only) available ugh M74) Transmission, Allison 1000 5- speed automatic $000 90.00 INC Report content is based on current data version referenced. Any performance -MOM calcriations me offered solely as guidelines. Actual unit performance will depend on your operating oondrtons. PC Carbooldb, Data Version: 101.3, Data updated 6/14/200512:02.•00 PM CCopyright 19008.2003 Ctarane Systems Corporation. All rights /warred. June 23, 2005 3305:10 PM Customer Fill, Page 1 uoiCJI ZUM 14:11 6264579953 • PAGE 02 2005 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD Reg Cab 133" WB Work Truck CC25903 VEHICLE DETAILS SELECTED OPTIONS - 2006 CC3i903 Reg Cab 13r WE Work Truck DF2 MIRRORS, OUTSIDE REARVIEW FOLDAWAY MANUAL, CAMPER• bake '6020 STYLE. BLACK, HIGH VISIBILITY, MENDABLE. incudes dual segment mirror on divers side that provides enhanced wide angle capacity (not recommended for bodies ar tmam wider Dan 86"1218.4 GT5 REAR AXLE, 4.10 RATIO (Refer to Engine/Axle Chart for availability. 80.00 Requires (RW9) Pidc p bed, delete Wits C*25003, C'25943 or C'25953 Mock* Wien (YF5) Emissions, CaMcrde stab requirements or 0E1) Enredons. New York, Vennor>t, Massachusetts or Maine state requirements. (L18) Engler. Va1ec 8100 V8 SFI and (ML6) Transmission, 8-apesd manual heavy-duty are speared.. -Not ahralebie on C"25743 or C'25753 Modes 1rMh (YF5) Err`ssiorhs: Caioornie stale requirements or (E1) Emissions, New Yorlc, Vemmont, Massachusetts or (L18)Maine ebb requirements. engine, heavy-duty ares 8100 V8 SFIpiug 6-epeed Xand. CONTROLWI ELECTRONIC TH SET AND specified) RESUME SPEED, *06.40 includes Male in instrument paid duster • KNP COO -NG„ EXTERNAL TRANSMSSION OIL COOLER, AUXILIARY, INC HEAVY-DUTY, AIR -TO -OIL (beaded and only available with (MT1) heavy-dutyTransmission. 4 -speed automatic, LQ4Alison 1000 5 -speed autonwlic) ar (1174) Transmission. ENGINE, VORTEC 6000 V8 SFl (300 HP [223 8 kW) a 4400 rpm, 390 80.00 bb. -R (486.6 N -m) 0 4000 rpm) (STD) MTI • TRANSMISSION, 4 -SPEED AUTOMATIC. NAVY -DUTY, *941.70 ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED VAIN OVERDRIVE, TOW/HAUL MODE and (KNP) Cooing. external harrsmission oil cooler (Requires • (LQ4) Engine, Valeo 6000 V8 SFI) NO LOCKING DIFFERENTIAL 80!00 OIZ TIRES, LT24.5ff5 t16E, ALL -SEASON. BLACKWALL (STD) (Includes 5 Ines eiI h (E63) Pickup bed. Fieetside boot. -Includes 4 Ares with (ZW9) 80.00 Pldasp bed, ddele) UM7 SOUND SYSTEM. ETR AWFM STEREO, includes seek -and -scan and 8000 digital clockReport content is based on current date version referenced. Anyperformance-relatedcdculations are offered softly as 9uideirheS. Actual unit performanOe vh0 depend on your operable conditions. PC Cathodes,Data Vereiorr 101.3, Data up0efed 611412005120200 PM °Copyright 1986,2003 Chrome was Corporation. Al rights resented. June 23. 2005 3:0500 PM r .kFhb: Page 2 06/23/2005 14:11 6264579953 • • PAGE 03 2005 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD Reg Cab 133" WB Work Truck CC25903 VEHICLE DETAILS ell-lcfen OPTIONS - zoos cc21ee3 Reg Cab 13r we Work Truck . . • Code kfflia YFS EMISSIONS. CAUFORNIA STATE REQUIREMENTS 30.00 ZW9 PICKUP BED, DELETE (Requires C•269•3 Models, deletes spare tire, 4622_64 *beet and rear" -Spate Ike avakable_ -With (KW) fli-Fuel Compressed HallamGas (CMG) stitskire (KU3) DecNcaled Compressed Nabsal Gee (CNG) Maim, Requires CC25903 Model, deletes spare We, *hest and rear bumper. Spare tire available) *CREDIT' - ZY1 PAWL SOUD (STD) OPTIONS TOTAL WOO SUM Report content Is based on current data version referenced. Any performance -related calculations are offered solely as guldeines. Actual unft performance wIP depend on your operating conditions. PC Carbookik Date Iressiort 101.3, Data updated 6111/2005 121/200 PM eCopyrtke 1986-2003 Chrome Systems Corporation. Al fights resented Customer Fie: June 23, 2005 3r0510 PM Page 3 i • • 06/23/2005 14:11 6264579953 JUN -23 -2005 -TRU 02:55 PM •YAL TRUCK BODY 14001 Garfield Avenue Palstn00nt, Canfornia 90723 (562) 6339951 (362) 633+9004 FAX FAX No. 5626332`]7 (,)t OT.AT►Ov PAGE 04 P. 002 6S MRL MK 047 Thick -Due Dab �OOLAR Bea met S o WONDIZES CHEVROLET L 1247 W. MAIN ST. D ALHAMBRA, CA. 91806 S N WONDRIES CHEVROLET I 1247 W. MAIN ST. P AL HAMBRA, CA 91806 WQNDR C !'need By VO - vv 2005rnOOL UNIT/CHEVY CC25903,REG CAB CHASSIS 1 1Sw (CHECK SPEC BUILD IF ORDERED) V048 40111 ROYAL BODY W/OPENTOP LIDS ALUMDRIM LID COVERS, APPEAR/1MPACZAOE. LEGAL LIGHT?MXAGE, ROYALS RECEsm BURR. WEIGHT CERTIFICATE, PAINED WRiTB AND INSTALLED. itoNs LESS: DEALER DISCOUNT- SUB /VD -3 LESS: VOLUME DISCOUNT - SUB 4,814.0000 4,814.00 x481.00 • -17340 THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING ROYAL!!! QUOTATION WILL BE HONORED FOR 30 DAYS Quotation #:0089351 July 7, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council City Council Meeting of July 12, 2005 Appeal of Employee Relations Officer's Determination on Request for Unit Modification Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council refer the appeal to the City's Civil Service Board for a hearing and final determination. The City Council also has the option to review the matter and make a determination. If the City Council chooses this option the representative from the Professional and Administrative Employees Association has requested that a separate City Council meeting be scheduled prior to a regular meeting to consider the matter. Background On February 7, 2005 the City received a request from the Public Works Inspector to change bargaining units from the current General and Supervisory Employees Association represented by the Teamsters, Local 911 to the Professional and Administrative Employees Association represented by the City Employees Associates. The procedures for filing and processing such requests are spelled out in the City's • Employer -Employee Relations Resolution (EERR). The request was reviewed and evaluated considering the criterion established in the EERR and was denied. The denial was sent to the affected employee, the Professional and Administrative Employees Association and the General and Supervisory Employees Association on March 9, 2005. As provided in the EERR, an appeal of the determination was filed and received on March 24, 2005. The appeal process includes the provision for utilizing the services of a mediator in an effort to resolve the matter. The City contacted the State Mediation and Conciliation Service and began coordinating the mediation. ,.On May 3, 2005, the City received a subsequent request on behalf of the Professional and Administrative Employees Association (now calling themselves the Professional, Technical Employees Association) attempting to amend the original request of behalf of the Public Works Inspector to include a total of three classifications, Public Works Inspector, Building Inspector, and Code Enforcement Officer. The parties met with a mediator on June 14, 2005 and were unable to resolve the issue. Following the mediation, the Professional and Administrative Employees Association requested an appeal as provided in the EERR. 2k Analysis Attached for City Council review and information is, the original request from the Public Works Inspector, the determination in response to the request, the request for mediation on behalf of the Public Works Inspector, the request to modify the original request to include three classifications, and the request for appeal to the City Council. Staff has contacted the representative from the Professional and Administrative Employees Association and they are in agreement that this issue be heard before the City's Civil Service Board if that is the direction from the City Council. Section, 2.76.090 (B) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code provides that when requested by the City Council or the City manager, the Civil Service Board shall hold hearings and make recommendations on any matter of personnel administration of the City Council or the City Manager. Respectfully Submitted: Concur: Michael Earl Personnel & Risk Management Director Sfephen Burrell City Manager From: Victor 0. Jackson 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California February 7, 2005 Sub: Local Public Employee Organization, Teamsters: Request Unit Change To: City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California Attn: Michael Earl, Personnel Director ISE EliV ED FEB 0 7 2005 Dear Mr. Earl, Please accept this letter as my formal request for removal from the union that currently represents me, and acceptance into the Professional & Administration Employees (P&AE) Association. I believe my interests are better served by the P&AE Association. As you know, as the Public Works. Inspector, I am a class of one (1). Thus my interests are unique and peculiarly different from most served by the Unit in which I am currently included. My present unit of representation includes (for the most part) manual labor employees who exercise little or no discretion in the performance of their duties. Conversely, I must use discretion in the performance of my duties daily. Resolution No: 90- 5343 (employer-employee organization relations resolution), Article I — General Provisions, Section 2. Definitions, sub -section g. reads as follows: "Administrative Employee" means an employee performing office or Non -manual work directly related to management policies or general business operations of the employer and such work includes the exercise of discretion and independent judgment." As the Public Works Inspector, I am responsible for: 1) issuing permits (work orders, and stop work orders: administrative, non -manual), 2) inspecting city projects, 3) making determinations (are they in compliance, does this present a hazard, stop work orders, issue citations/fines, all requiring discretion and independent judgment, non -manual), 4) plan checking (reading blueprints, checking them against city ordinances,, state regulations, non -manual), 5) calculating permit fees, 6) hazard prevention (non -manual, calling for discretion/judgment), 7) inter -agency correspondence (engineering/utilities/law enforcement/department heads), 1 • work order changes (i.e. a need to widen right-of-way, public notice rqmts; non - manual, independent judgment). All of the above responsibilities are non -manual, require the constant use of independent judgment, and particular experience and expertise (this position requires specialized knowledge). Moreover, they make me liable as a city representative in a way manual labor workers are not. For instance, if in exercising my independent judgment I decide a Contractor must widen a street and he thinks it unfair, I personally may be charged with discrimination because it is I who made the determination. Manual workers have no such authority or discretion. By definition they work according to routine procedure without exercising this type of authority. Because my duties are non -manual, require discretion and independent thinking, place a non -manual labor burden of liability upon me, require specialized knowledge of which I possess (college courses, certificate courses, prior experience), I petition the City to place me in the "Appropriate Unit", the Professional & Administration Employees Association. I respectfully request this change be effective immediately. Victor 0. Jackson City of Hermosa Beach, Public Works Inspector DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: • • City of2-iermosa rl3eaclt� Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM March 9, 2005 Victor Jackson, Public Works Inspector Michael Earl, Personnel Direct Request for Unit Change I have reviewed your request to change the bargaining unit for your classification of Public Works Inspector and provide the following response. As outlined in the City's Employer -Employee Organization Relations Resolution, there are five criteria in determining the appropriate unit designation for classifications within the City. Generally stated, these four criteria include: similarity of the general kinds of work performed, types of qualifications required and the general working conditions; history of representation within the City and similar employment; consistency with the organizational patterns of the City; number of employees and classifications, and the effect on the administration of employer-employee relations; and the effect on the classification structure and impact on the stability of employer-employee relationship of dividing a single or related classifications among two or more units. In addressing your request and in accordance with the above criteria I looked at the education and experience required of your position, the type of work performed, working conditions, unit history in the City, and similar employment in neighboring cities and have determined that your classification is appropriately assigned to the General and Supervisory Employees Association. There for your request is denied. Specifically, a majority of the classifications represented by the Professional and Administrative Employees bargaining unit require a higher educational level than the Public Works Inspector. Eight of the classifications require the possession of a bachelor's degree. Those that do not require similar to that of the Public Works Inspector but are administrative in nature or are Division Supervisors. The classifications in the Professional and Administrative group consist of managerial, supervisory or administrative employees. The employer-employee relations resolution specifically states that these responsibilities are determining factors in establishing appropriate units. The kind of work performed by you as a Public Works Inspector is more similar in nature to that performed by classifications in the General and Supervisory group. Your work is performed predominately in the field as opposed to an office environment. Your work is performed within established guidelines (i.e. municipal and building codes) and the decisions you make in the field involve enforcing those codes. Deviations from these policies should require input from a supervisor. Lastly, neighboring cities' also assign the Public Works Inspector classification to a general employee unit. Specifically, the cities of Manhattan Beach, El Segundo, and Redondo Beach have the same unit organization. I have provided a copy of your request and a copy of my determination to the Teamsters Local, 911 organization representing the General and Supervisory Employees Association as well as to, the City Employees Associates representing the Professional and Administrative Employees' Association in accordance with Section 10 of the Employer -Employee Relations Resolution. Section 11 of the Resolution provides for an appeal of my decision on unit determination. An aggrieved employee organization may file an appeal in accordance with Section 11 within fifteen (15) days of this notice. OI have attached a copy of the Resolution for reference. cc: Robin Nahin, City Employees Associates William Davis, Teamsters Local 911 Mike Earl From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michael Koskie [mkcea0l@charter.net] Thursday, March 24, 2005 10:17 AM Mike Earl Robin Nahin Request for Unit Change Mr Earl: On behalf of Victor Jackson, we his request for Unit Change. We think it would be beneficial California State Conciliation Service Resolution 90-5343. •Would you, like to contact this service Michael Koskie CEA would like to Appeal the City's response to to pursue the intervention of the as outlined in Section 11 of 1 or us? • City Employees Associates 254 B Lindero Avenue Long Beach, CA 90803 562-433-6983 (voice) 562-433-1264 (fax) cea01 na charter.net May 3, 2005 Michael Earl • Personnel and Risk Manager 131 i Valley Drive Hermosa 'Beach, CA 90254 Re: Modification of Prior Petition Dear Mr. Earl: RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2005 The Hermosa.Beach Professional, Administrative and Technical Employees Association on behalf of Victor Jackson's February. 7, 2005 Request. for_ Unit Change would like perfect the petition by expanding the list of position classifications requesting to change, bargaining units to include: • Building Inspector • Code Enforcement Officer • Public Works Inspector I have attached a petition signed by the affected employees. Yours truly, Michael E. Koskie Association Staff cc: HBPAA Board 04/12/2005 10:25 3109375015 • HB PUBLICWORI;o PAGE 02 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED HERMOSA BEACH INSPECTORS AND CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WISH TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE HERMOSA BEACH PROFESSIONAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION PRINT SIGN DATE June 21, 2005 C. Employees Associates Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley Drive. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Request for Hearing over Employee Petition for Unit Modification Honorable Council: 254 B Lindero Avenue Long Beach, CA 90803 562-433-6983 (voice) 562-433-1264 (fax) cea01@charter.net Pursuant to the City of Hermosa Beach Employer-employee Relations Resolution (Resolution No. 90- 5343) the Hermosa Beach Professional, Technical and Administrative Employees Association (PTAE) requests a hearing with the Council for purposes of resolving a dispute over a proposed unit modification for three job classes. Facts in this matter are: ♦ Four employees in three. City job classifications have petitioned change bargaining units (from the General Unit, represented by the Teamsters to the.. Professional/Administrative Unit, represented by the Professional, Technical & Administrative Employees Association.) The three job classes are Building Inspector, Code Enforcement Officer and Public Works Inspector. The employees' petition is attached. • Although the Teamsters have expressed no objection to the representational change, City Management has not granted this Unit Modification. A meeting with a mediator from the State Mediation and Conciliation Service on June 14 was not successful in resolving this. dispute. ♦ . The employees believe that their positions have a strong community of interest with the other classes in the PTEA unit and that their right t be represented by the organization of choice should not be obstructed by the City. At the hearing with the Council the employees and their Association will provide the basis for this proposed unit modification, and request that the City grant their petition. Thank you for your consideration. Would you please. direct City staff to contact me for in order to schedule a hearing date. Sincerely, Robin Nahin HBPTEA Association Staff rHut e, • WE, THE UNDERSIGNED HERMOSA BEACH INSPECTORS AND CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WISH TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE HERMOSA BEACH PROFESSIONAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION PRINT "94/ Cnd ti SIGN DATE -zs'-d s� ?7 9(95 July 7, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council 62ff.t-uz-cre-J)0s- -2/i/a5 City Council Meeting of July 12, 2005 Resolution Approving Memorandum of Understanding Between the City and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association — Police Officers and Police Sergeants Bargaining Group. Background: The City Council directed staff to meet and confer with representatives of this employee group to discuss wages, hours, and working conditions contained in the Memorandum of Understanding that expired on June 30, 2005. The parties have reached a tentative agreement on the terms described below. The members of the employee group met and have approved the tentative agreement. The negotiated major changes include: 1. Term of the, agreement is to be July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2008. 2. Salary Increases of 6% (including 4% general increase and 2% market adjustment) effective July 1, 2005, July 1, 2006, and July 1, 2007 3. Removal of bilingual premium pay for one officer to be replaced by $6 additional uniform allowance per month for all employees. The fiscal impact for this group is $262,220 for the 2005-2006 fiscal year. Funding for this has been included in Prospective Expenditures account of the 2005-2006 Budget. Respectf Hy submitted: Nchael Earl ersonnel & Risk Management Director 114(1 St.she Burrell : City Manager 21 RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION — POLICE OFFICERS AND POLICE SERGEANTS BARGAINING GROUP WHEREAS, employees of the City of Hermosa Beach, California represented by the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association, have elected to meet and confer with the City of Hermosa Beach on matters concerning wages, hours, and working conditions; and, WHEREAS, the above personnel have selected certain individuals to represent them; and WHEREAS, Employee and Management representatives have jointly negotiated a Memorandum of Understanding which has been ratified by a majority vote of the members of the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association — Police Officers and Police Sergeants Bargaining Group; and WHEREAS, the Employee and Management representatives have mutually agreed to recommend that the City Council adopt this Memorandum of Understanding: NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach resolves to enter. into a Memorandum of Understanding to be effective for the period of July 1, 2005 through and including June 30, 2006, and authorizes the Personnel Director to sign the Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. 2 Police Officers & Sergeants PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF JULY 2005, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney 3 Police Officers & Sergeants • • MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND POLICE OFFICERS AND POLICE SERGEANTS BARGAINING GROUP JULY 1, 2005 - JUNE 30, 2008 4 Police Officers & Sergeants MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS AND POLICE SERGEANTS BARGAINING GROUP ARTICLE 1 — PARTIES TO THE MEMORANDUM This Memorandum of Understanding, hereinafter referred to as the "MOU" or the "Agreement," has been entered into, pursuant to the laws of the State of California and the City of Hermosa Beach, California, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as the "City" or as "Management," and the HERMOSA. BEACH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, hereinafter, referred to as the "Association. ARTICLE 2 — RECOGNITION Pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act,, (Government Code 3500, et seq.), the City agrees to, and does, recognize the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association as the exclusive representative of the full-time positions in the classifications of POLICE OFFICER AND POLICE SERGEANT of the City of Hermosa Beach. ARTICLE 3 — SCOPE & IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING A. This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) constitutes the joint recommendation of Management and the Association. It shall not be binding in whole or in part upon the parties unless and until the following conditions have been complied with: 1. The Association shall notify the City Council in writing that it has formally approved the Memorandum of Understanding in its entirety. 2. The City Council shall approve this Memorandum of Understanding. 3. This MOU has been reached following good -faith negotiations, by the authorized Management representative of the City Council and the authorized representative for the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association. 6 Police Officers & Sergeants • • 5 Police Officers & Sergeants ARTICLE 4 — MONTHLY MEETINGS A. In the interest. of fostering and continuing a spirit and atmosphere of harmonious employer-employee relationships, it is agreed that the Association Board of Directors shall meet once a month at a designated time and place with administrative officers of the Department. There shall be no less than two. (2) Board members present for each such meeting. B. It is further agreed that the Association and the City Manager shall meet when requested by the Association to best effect implementation of this document. ARTICLE 5 — JOB ACTION A. The Association and its members agree that during the term of this MOU there shall be no strike. B. In the event of an unauthorized strike, the City agrees that there will be no liability on the 'part of the Association provided the Association promptly and publicly disavows such unauthorized action; orders the employees to return to work and attempts to bring about a prompt resumption of normal operations; and provided further, that the Association notifies the City in writing, within 48 hours after the commencement of such strike, what measures it has taken to comply with the provisions of this strike. C. In the event such strike by the Association, has not affected resumption of normal work practices, the City shall have the right to take appropriate disciplinary action. ARTICLE 6 — NON-DISCRIMINATION Both parties to this Agreement agree not to discriminate against any employee or applicant because of age, gender, race, national origin, religion, color, ancestry, marital status, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, medical condition, and/or Association membership or activity. Additionally, the City expects and requires all employees to treat one another with dignity and respect. Harassment of fellow employees is a violation of law. No employment decision may be made based upon an employee's submission to or rejection of such conduct. It is the responsibility of any employee, who believes that they are the victim of such harassment, whether sexual, racial, ethnic or religious, to report the conductto their Division Commander, Chief of Police, Personnel Director or the City Manager in a timely manner. 7 Police Officers & Sergeants • • ARTICLE 7 — MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 1. Manage the City. 2. Schedule working hours. 3. Establish, modify or change work schedules or standards. 4. Institute changes in procedures. 5. Direct the work force, including the right to hire, promote, demote, transfer, suspend, discipline or discharge any employee. 6. Determine the location of any new facilities, buildings, departments, divisions, or subdivisions thereof, and the relocation, sale, leasing or closing of facilities, departments, divisions, or subdivisions thereof. 7. Determine services to be rendered. 8. Determine the layout of buildings and equipment and materials to be used herein. 9. Determine processes, techniques, methods and means of performing work. 10. Determine the size, character and use of inventories. 11. Determine the financial policy including accounting procedures. 12. Determine the administrative organization of the system. 13. Determine selection, promotion, or transfer of employees. 14. Determine the size and characteristics of the work force. 15. Determine the allocation and assignment of work to employees. 16. Determine policy affecting the selection of new employees. 17. Determine the establishment of quality and quantity standards and the judgment of quality and quantity of work required. 18. Determine administration of discipline. 19. Determine control and use of City property, materials and equipment. 20. Schedule work periods and determine the number and duration of work periods. 8 Police Officers & Sergeants 21. Establish, modify, eliminate or enforce rules and regulations. 22. Place work with outside firms. 23. Determine the kinds and numbers of personnel necessary. 24. Determine the methods and means by which such operations are to be conducted. 25. Require employees, where necessary, to take in-service training courses during working hours. 26. Determine duties to be included in any job classifications. 27. Determine the necessity of overtime and the amount of overtime required. 28. Take any necessary action to carry out the mission of the City in cases of an emergency. The exercise of the foregoing powers, rights authority, duties and responsibilities by the City, the adoption of policies, rules, regulations and practices in furtherance thereof, and the use of judgment and the discretion in connection therewith, shall be limited only by the specific and express terms of this Memorandum of Understanding, City Personnel Ordinance and Personnel Rules and Regulations, the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights, and other statutory law. Except in emergencies, or where the City is required to make changes in its operations because of the requirements of law, whenever the exercise of management's rights shall impact on employees of the bargaining unit,, the City agrees to meet and confer with representatives of the Association, upon request by the Association, regarding the impact -of the exercise of such rights unless the matter of the exercise of such rights is provided for in this Memorandum of Understanding. ARTICLE 8 — PROVISIONS OF LAW — INSEPARABILITY It is mutually understood that this MOU is, and shall be, subject to all current and future applicable state, federal and local laws. If any article, part, provision or segment of this MOU is, orshall be, in conflict with or inconsistent with such applicable provisions of federal, state or local law, or is otherwise held to be invalid, or unenforceable 'by any court of competent jurisdiction by final decree, such article, part or provision thereof shall be superseded by such applicable law and the remainder of this MOU shall in no way be affected thereby. 9 Police Officers & Sergeants ARTICLE 9 — FULL UNDERSTANDING, MODIFICATION, WAIVER A. It is intended that this Agreement sets forth the full and entire understanding of the parties regarding the matters set forth herein, and any other prior or existing understanding or agreements by the parties whether formal or informal, regarding any such matters are hereby superseded or terminated in their entirety. B. Except as specifically provided herein, it is agreed and understood that each party hereto voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives its right, and agrees that the other shall not be required to negotiate with respect to any subject or matter covered herein during the term of this agreement. C. Any agreement, alteration, understanding, variation, waiver, or modification of any of the terms or provisions contained herein shall not be binding upon the parties hereto unless made and executed in writing by all parties hereto, and if required, approved and implemented by the City Council. D. The. waiver of any breach, term or condition of this Agreement by either party shall not constitute a precedent in the future enforcement of all its terms and provisions. ARTICLE 10 — GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE The Grievance Procedure is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. ARTICLE 11 — WORK SCHEDULE A. The City agrees to the utilization of the 3/36 plan for all officers and sergeants assigned to patrol, motors and K-9. There will be no payback days during the months of approximately December through May. There will be payback days during the months of approximately June through November. B. The Sergeants and Officers assigned to investigations and administrative positions will work a 4/36 schedule (four nine -hour days/week) during the months of December through May and a 4/40 schedule (four ten-hour days/week) during the months of June through November. C. The exact change over dates from payback to no payback for patrol, motors and K-9 will be determined by the Patrol Commander based upon the current twenty- one (21) day cycle. D. In the event of an emergency situation, the City may cancel, alter or amend the work schedule as necessary, immediately. 10 Police Officers & Sergeants E. It is mutually agreed that for the reduction in hours expressed in "A" and "B" above, the City, for market salary comparison purposes only, shall increase base salary 5% as a credit. ARTICLE 12 — COMPENSATION - METHODS OF COMPENSATION Methods of Compensation: 1. Compensation shall be determined on an hourly basis. 2. Payments due shall be paid on a bimonthly basis unless, otherwise mutually agreed. By mutual consent early payments and other modifications can be made. 3. Base hourly salary shall be considered the rate of pay for a particular classification without consideration of any other form of compensation. B. Salary Advancements within Base Pay Range: 1. Step Advancement: a. All salary advances shall be based on merit and fitness. All increases shall be recommended by the Department Head and approved by the Personnel Director/City Manager. Merit increases shall be effective at the beginning of the next pay period (1st or 16th of the month). b. Upon the successful and satisfactory completion of twelve (12) months service (exclusive of police recruit status), employees shall be advanced one step within their range and .yearly thereafter until the maximum within the range achieved. 2. Promotion a. An employee who is promoted to a position in a class with a higher salary rate shall be entitled to the lowest step in the higher range, which exceeds the present rate of pay with the intent of increasing the base salary rate by at least 5%. C. Compensatory Time: 1. Employees may accrue up to 175 hours of compensatory time and may cash out all or part of such accrued time at any time, subject to the budgetary constraints of the department. 11 Police Officers & Sergeants ARTICLE 13 — BASE SALARY A. Base salary ranges shall be as follows: POLICE OFFICER 4331 . 4547 4775 5013 POLICE SERGEANT 5208 5469 5742 6030 B. Effective July 1, 2006 the base salary range shall be increased 6% for Police Officer and Police Sergeant. Effective July 1, 2007 the base salary range shall be increases 6% for Police Officer and Police Sergeant. ARTICLE 14 - OVERTIME PRACTICES - A. 7K Exemption The City of Hermosa Beach has exercised its ability to take a statutory 7K exemption for sworn police personnel. The work period for such employees shall be 28 days in length commencing on Sunday, May 22, 1988, at 12:01 A.M. B. F.L.S.A. Overtime All employees required to perform in excess of the standard work shift, or at times other than their regularly scheduled work shift, shall receive compensation at the rate of time and one-half their regular rate of pay. The regular rate of pay shall include the following components in addition to base salary. • 1. Educational incentive 2. Assignment Pay 3. Longevity Pay C. Paid Leave Exclusions In determining an employee's eligibility for overtime compensation in a workday, paid leaves of absence and unpaid leaves of absence shall be excluded from the total hours worked. For this purpose, paid leaves of absences include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Vacation 2. Holiday Leave 3. Sick Leave 4. Compensatory Leave 5. 4850 Time 12 Police Officers & Sergeants • 6. Jury Duty 7. Military Leave 13 Police Officers & Sergeants • • D. Compensatory Time 1. In lieu of receiving cash payment for overtime hours, an employee may elect the option of taking compensatory time off. 2. Compensatory time shall be earned at the time and one-half rate for each hour worked. An employee may accrue up to a maximum of 175 hours (after conversion at time and one-half) compensatory time. E. Overtime Authorization All overtime requests must have prior written authorization of a supervisor prior to the commencement of such overtime work. Where prior written authorization is not feasible, explicit verbal authorization must be obtained. Where verbal authorization is obtained, written authorization must be obtained as soon thereafter as practicable. Dispatched calls beyond the end of duty time are considered as authorized. An employee's failure to obtain prior written approval, or explicit verbal authorization followed by written authorization, will result in the denial of the overtime request. F. Shift Trades 1. The practice of shift trading shall be voluntary on behalf of each employee involved in the trade. The trade must be due to the employee's desire or need to attend to a personal matter and not due to the department's operations. The employee providing the trade shall not have his/her compensable hours increased as a result of the trade; nor shall the employee receiving the trade have their compensable hours decreased as a result of the trade. Any premium pay or other extra compensation shall continue to accrue only to the person originally entitled to the premium pay or extra compensation. Any hours worked beyond the normal workday will be credited to the individual actually doing work. "Paybacks" of shift trade are the obligation of the two employees involved in the trade. Paybacks are to be completed within one (1) calendar year of the date of the initial shift trade. Any dispute as to the paybacks is to be resolved by the involved employees, and under no circumstances will the department be obligated for any further compensation whatsoever to any of the involved employees. The department is not responsible in any manner for hours owed to employees by other employees that leave the employment of the City or are assigned other duties. A record of all initial shift trades and "paybacks" shall be maintained by the involved employees on forms provided by the department ("shift trade log.") 2. If one individual fails to appear for the other (regardless of the reason), the person who was scheduled as a result of the shift trade will be listed as absent without leave and may be subject to disciplinary action. 14 Police Officers & Sergeants • • G. Early Relief Policy The practice of early shift release shall be voluntary on behalf of each employee involved in the relief. The employee providing the early relief shall not have his/her compensable hours increased as a result of the early relief, nor shall the employee relieved early have their compensable hours decreased as a result of the early relief. "Paybacks" of early relief hours are the sole obligation of the two employees involved in the early relief. Any dispute is to be resolved by the involved employees, and under no circumstances will the department be obligated for any further compensation whatsoever to any of the involved employees. The department is not responsible in any manner for hours owed to employees by other employees that leave the employment of the City or are. assigned other duties. H. Training Time Attendance at training school/facilities (including the academy), which improves the performance of regular tasks and/ or prepares for job. advancement are not compensable for hours in excess of the employee's normal work shift. Any time spent in excess of the normal work shift will not be counted as -working time and is not compensable in any manner whatsoever. Time spent in studying: and other personal pursuits is not compensable hours of work. I. City Vehicle Use Except as otherwise herein provided, employees who are provided with a City vehicle to travel to and from work shall not be compensated in any manner whatsoever for travel time to and from work. This provision also applies in those situations where the radio must be left on and monitored. J. City Motorcycle Use Employees assigned to motor duty may, with the approval of the Police Chief, use the city assigned motorcycle to travel to and from work. Such travel time will not be compensated in any manner whatsoever (even when the employee is required to leave the radio on and monitor the radio.) Any work the employee performs on the motorcycle while away from the police facility will not be considered hours worked and will not be compensated in any manner whatsoever. 15 Police Officers & Sergeants K. Clothes Changing Employees are not authorized to wear their uniforms or any part thereof that is distinguishable as such unless on duty. Employees are provided with a locker for their personal convenience. Any employee may or may not utilize the locker for storage and changing purposes at their own discretion. Nothing herein prevents an employee from wearing their uniform to and/or from their residence to work as long as the badge and insignia are covered in a non -police issued garment such as a windbreaker. Employees choosing to wear their uniforms covered to and/or from work should not wear their "Sam Browne" belt. Time spent in changing clothes before or after shift, is not considered hours worked and is not compensable in any manner whatsoever. L. Call Backs Call Back duty occurs when an employee is ordered to return to duty on a non - regularly scheduled work shift. Call back does not occur when an employee is held over from their prior shift or is working prior to their regularly scheduled shift. An employee called back to duty shall be credited with a minimum of two hours work commencing when the employee reports to work. Any hours worked in excess of two hours shall be credited on an hour -for -hour basis for actual time worked. Thisprovision is to be distinguished from Court pay, which is to be used when an employee is called back to court. M. Court Time 1. When an officer is physically called to court, they shall be credited on an hour -for -hour basis for the time actually spent in court. They shall receive a minimum two (2) hours paid at time and a half for a morning appearance with a minimum two (2) hours paid at time and a half for an afternoon appearance. Travel time shall be included for any •subpoenaed appearance other than to the Torrance Courthouse. 2. An officer who is subpoenaed to testify telephonically shall receive a minimum three (3) hours for a morning time and three (3) hours for an afternoon time. N. Standby Court Time An employee who while off duty is on court standby status may leave a telephone number where they may be reached while on court standby. Such time is not considered hours worked under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The employee will receive straight time pay, up to a maximum of 8.5 hours per day, for standby during the pendency of the case. 16 Police Officers & Sergeants ARTICLE 15 —INSURANCE COVERAGE A. LIFE City shall provide a life insurance policy for each employee, payable in the amount of $60,000 upon such employee's death. B. MENTAL HEALTH City shall make such a plan available to City employees; the full cost to be paid by the employee. C. VISION City shall make such a plan available to City employees; the full cost tobe paid by the employee. D. MEDICAL 1. City shall provide for Association members a medical insurance plan to include a choice of an indemnity plan with $300.00 deductible or an HMO plan; both plans to include maternity care and prescription benefits. The current medical plan or its equivalent, to remain in force during the term of this MOU. City shall meet and consult should there be 'a change in providers or plan structure. The City is exploring the ability to offer health insurance through P.E.R.S. 2. The HMO plan shall have no greater than a $10.00 office visit and prescription co -pay during the term of this Agreement. 3. City to pay employee costs and current dependent rate with any future increased dependent costs to be borne 80%. City and 20% employee. E. DENTAL 1. City shall provide for Association members a dental insurance plan to include a choice of an indemnity plan or a pre -paid plan. 2. City to pay employee cost and current dependent rate with any future increased dependent costs to be borne 80% City and 20% employee. ARTICLE 16 — DEFERRED COMPENSATION City agrees to make available to all employees in the Unit the citywide Deferred Compensation Plan. All participants being then eligible to vote on decisions of the Deferred Compensation Committee. Members of the Association may participate in any of the Deferred Compensation plans provided for City employees. 17 Police Officers & Sergeants • • ARTICLE 17 — RETIREMENT A. The City shall maintain the 2% @ 50/PERS contract with "ONE YEAR FINAL COMPENSATION" in effect at the time of this contract. B. The City will pay the FULL employee's 9% contribution to the P.E.R.S. retirement system credited to the employee's portion. C. The City shall report to P.E.R.S. the value of the 9% employer paid member contribution (EPMC) pursuant to the authority of Government Code section 20023(c)(4). D. Retiree medical insurance stipends provided to employees who retiredprior to July 1, 2003 shall remain at existing amounts. Employees covered by this agreement who retire from the City of Hermosa Beach after July 1, 2003 will be eligible for the following medical insurance benefits: 1. For retirement at age fifty (50), or for disability retirement (no age restriction), with a minimum of twenty (20) years total full-time sworn police service with the City, the City will pay an amount up to the employee only HMO premium available through the City's medical insurance provider. 2. For retirement at age fifty-five (55) with a minimum of fifteen (15) years total full-time service with the City, the City will pay an amount up to the employee only HMO rate available through the City's medical insurance provider. 3. Said benefit shall commence with the first month following the employee's retirement in which the employee is responsible for payment of the insurance premium. 4. In order to be eligible for medical supplement payments, an employee must either remain on a medical insurance plan offered by the City or provide proof of coverage on a self -procured medical insurance plan. 5. Any payments made by the City shall normally be made directly to a medical insurance provider. However, other payment arrangements may be considered. 6. Any employee receiving a benefit under this article agrees to apply for, and enroll in, any Federal and/or State medical insurance plan (e.g. Medicare, Medicaid, etc.) for which they may become eligible. 7. Upon enrollment in Medicare, the City agrees to pay the premium for purchasing coverage equivalent to the benefits provided under the existing Medicare "Part B" program. 18 Police Officers & Sergeants 8. For employees not eligible for Medicare benefits, who were employed prior to the City's participation in the Medicare program, the City will continue retiree medical insurance benefits the employee is eligible for under section 1 or 2 above. E. The City shall amend its contract with the Public Employees' Retirement System to provide the retirement formula known as 3% @ 50 effective January 1, 2001. ARTICLE 18 — LEAVE OF ABSENCE Management agrees to allow all employees covered by this MOU to take a leave of absence without pay, not to exceed 60 days, in conjunction with, or in addition to, their regular vacation time. This leave will only be allowed every other year. Timing and duration of leave subject to approval of and subject to the needs of the department. Any request for such leave must be delivered to the Chief a minimum of 30 days in advance. This provision shall not reduce any leave entitlement an employee may have under the Military and Veterans Code. ARTICLE 19 — VACATION A. Effective October 1, 1994 the Vacation accrual rates for all employees covered by this agreement shall be as follows: 1. Upon hire, at the rate of 96 hours/year. 2. Commencing with the 7th year, at the rate of 112 hours/year. 3. Commencing with the 8th year, at the rate of 136 hours/year. 4. Commencing with the 15th year, at the rate of 160 hours/year. 5. Commencing with the 16th year, at the rate of 168 hours/year. 6. Commencing with the 17th year, atthe rate of 176 hours/year. B. An employee covered by this Agreement may accrue vacation time to a maximum of 270 hours. Cash out of any earned but unused vacation accrual in excess of 270 hours (as of September 30th each year) shall be automatically cashed out as part of the October 20th payroll. Those employees who as of March 1, 1995 have an accrual balance in excess of 270 hours shall have that amount as their accrual maximum. Lower accruals will become their new maximum until such time as their bank reaches 270 hours. C. During the term of this Agreement Police Management shall formulate a paid time -off policy. 19 Police Officers & Sergeants ARTICLE 20 — HOLIDAYS A. Employees assigned to patrol activities shall receive 9.33 hours per month of "Holiday Comp"_ for each month so assigned (includes Motors and Community Lead assignments). B. Each officer assigned to a detective position, including background/training detective, administrative position or specialty assignment shall receive the following holidays off with pay: New Years' Day; Martin Luther King Jr's Birthday; Presidents Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day; Labor Day; Veteran's Day; Thanksgiving Day; and Christmas Day. The week of Thanksgiving, each officer assigned to a detective position, including background/training detective, administrative position or specialty assignment will work thirty (30) hours. C. An employee covered by this Agreement may accrue Holiday Comp time to a maximum of 112 hours. Cash out of any earned but unused Holiday Comp accrual in excess of 112 hours (as of: September 30th of each year) shall be automatically cashed out as part of the October 20th payroll. ARTICLE 21 -SICK LEAVE A. Effective October 1, 1994, sick. leave accrual shall be as follows: 1. Those employees having less than 176 accrued hours of sick leave shall accrue sick leave at the rate of 6 hours per month until their accrual accumulates to 176 hours at which time their accrual shall be 8 hours per month. B. A once a year cash -in can be up to 100% of the unused sick leave as long as at least 176 accrued hours remains on hand. An employee may accrue a maximum of three hundred and fifty hours (350); thereafter any excess shall be cashed out. Employees who have more than 350 hours of sick time on the books as of March 1, 1991 shall be frozen at that accumulation; any earned sick time in excess of that amount shall be cashed out. C. In the case of serious illness of a member of the immediate family, the employee may utilize sick leave. Immediate family for the purpose of this section shall be defined as: father; mother; father-in-law; mother-in-law; grandparents; brother; sister; spouse; or legal dependent. Employees may predesignate and substitute other members for those members defined as "immediate family." The intent of this provision is not to expand the number of persons included in the definition of "immediate family" or to increase paid leave opportunities, but, rather to recognize variation in family structure (e.g. stepmother for mother). 20 Police Officers & Sergeants • D. Effective March 1, 1995 upon termination from City employment, sick leave will be paid at the current hourly pay rate, on the following conditions: 1. 25% pay 5 through 9 years of total full time City service. 2. 50% pay 10 through 19 years of total full time City service. 3. 100% pay 20 + years of total full time City service. ARTICLE 22 — BEREAVEMENT LEAVE Each employee shall receive a maximum of three shifts per calendar year to be utilized for bereavement leave because of a death in their immediate family. Immediate family shall be defined as in Article 21 C - SICK LEAVE. Said time will not be cumulative from one twelve month period to another nor will pay in lieu of unused leave for bereavement be provided. The Chief may grant one (1) additional shift in the event of a death that requires extended travel. ARTICLE 23 - LONGEVITY PAY Effective July 1, 2004, employees shall receive additional compensation of 5% above base salary for each level of full-time sworn police service with the City of Hermosa Beach according to the following schedule: Upon commencement of the fifth (5th) year Upon commencement of the tenth (10th) year Upon commencement of the fifteenth (15th) year Upon commencement of the twentieth (20t) year. ARTICLE 24— EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION & MAINTENANCE OF BENEFITS A. In recognition of formal professional training, obtained from either an accredited educational institution or through P.O.S.T. sanctioned training, or a combination of both, City agrees to a concept of pay as an adjunct to base monthly salary for achieving various levels of professional proficiency certification as follows: Effective July 1, 2004, employees who obtain an A.A. or A.S. degree or an Intermediate P.O.S.T. Certificate shall receive additional compensation of 5% above base salary. Effective July 1, 2004, employees who obtain a B.A. or B.S. degree or Advanced P.O.S.T. Certificate shall receive additional compensation of 10% above base salary. 21 Police Officers & Sergeants • • B. Employees receiving such compensation are obligated to maintain the educational level required for P.O.S.T. Certification, at the City's expense and at the direction of the Police Department. ARTICLE 25 — UNIFORM ALLOWANCE A. Said allowance for Officers and Sergeants to be $772/year, payable through the regular payroll schedule. B. An absence due to sick leave, or leave of absence without pay, exceeding sixty days (60), days shall result in a pro -rata reduction in uniform allowance for the time of the absence. ARTICLE 26 — AMMUNITION REPLACEMENT A. In addition to the quarterly qualification ammunition, each officer will be allowed to utilize fifty (50) rounds of ammunition for their primary duty weapon, at City expense, each month at the firing range used by the Department. The City will also pay for the expense of using the range. The ammunition will be used to practice on an approved course of fire so that officers will become more proficient with their service weapons. B. The City will not compensate officers for the time spent to utilize this ammunition. Officers must use the allotted ammunition each month, it does not accumulate. ARTICLE 27 — ASSIGNMENT PAY A. The City shall pay 9% of base salary per month to each officer assigned to a detective position, including background/training detective, administrative position or specialty assignment That compensation shall be for the additional time detectives are "on-call." This sum shall be included in total compensation calculations for retirement purposes. B. The City agrees to pay the personnel assigned as Community Lead Officer 7% of base salary per month as special duty pay. That sum shall be included in total compensation calculations for retirement purposes. C. The City agrees to pay to each officer assigned to field training or acting watch commander duties the sum of three dollars and thirty seven cents ($3.37) per hour as special duty pay. That sum shall be included in total compensation calculations for retirement purposes. D. The City agrees to pay each officer assigned to Motorcycle Duty 7% of base salary per month. This sum shall be payable when on duty, during hazardous duty disability leaves, and during absences from work of less than one month. This sum shall be included in total compensation calculations for retirement purposes. 22 Police Officers & Sergeants • E. It is the intent of these provisions that such assignments ,,will be for career development, and generally will be limited to an assignment of thirty-six (36) months. The right to assign and reassign shall be vested solely with the Chief of Police. F The parties understand and agree that all assignments to extra -pay positions are temporary assignments, and that officers will be rotated into and out of these assignments as part of the department's job enrichment and career development program. G. In conformity with this understanding, each officer who accepts an assignment shall sign a statement indicating that they understand the temporary nature of the assignment. Nothing herein shall abrogate an employee's appeal rights as set forth in Government Code Section 3304. H. The City agrees to pay each officer assigned to the Police Service Dog Program as a Police Service Dog , handler the sum of two hundred and twenty dollars ($220.00) per month. This amount shall be considered as full compensation for the additional incidental hours required for the animals veterinary care; routine care for the K -9's physical health, welfare and grooming; daily and routine maintenance to the K-9 patrol vehicle and field equipment.. This sum shall be included in total compensation calculations for retirement purposes. Time spent "on-call" shall not be considered hours worked for FLSA purposes and is not compensated in any manner. J. Employees assigned full time to the Department's Police Service Dog Program are subject to schedule changes contingent on meeting Police Dog Program priorities and Department needs. 23 Police Officers & Sergeants ARTICLE 28 — PHYSICAL FITNESS TIME The City and the Association agree to a program providing for an on -duty workout period for Officers and Sergeants under the following conditions and as approved by the Chief of Police: A. The workout shall be of thirty (30) minutes duration, beginning when the employee enters the workout facility. The workout shall take place within the City or within 1/4 mile of the City boundary. B. The work out shall be conducted during "Code -7" lunch period. C. There is not interruption of service to the City. D. Release time to workout is at the discretion of the City. E. Individuals may be barred from this program at City discretion if there is evidence of abuse. ARTICLE 29 — YEARLY SHIFT CHANGES A. There will be four (4) quarterly shift changes per twelve (12) month period. These. quarterly shift changes shall begin on the first Sunday of the first month of each quarter. The quarters shall run as follows: . 1. June, July, August 2. September, October, November 3. December, January, February 4. March, April, May Although there will be four (4) shift changes in a twelve month period, employees shall bid on a semi-annual basis for two consecutive shifts at a time. B For shift bidding purposes, the schedule will be posted on October 1, for the quarters December -February and March -May and on April 1 for the quarters June -August and September -November. The sign-up schedule will remain posted for thirty (30) days from the date of posting for employee shift bidding. Management will then have thirty (30) days to finalize the schedule in advance of the schedule change. C. Employees are not mandated to rotate between day and night shifts. Bidding for shifts and days off shall be made on a seniority basis. Management will continue to assign new hire employees to shifts only, without regard to days off, through completion of their probation. 24 , Police Officers & Sergeants D. With regard to new hire employees, following the successful completion of their probationary period, and provided they have worked all shifts in the Patrol Bureau exclusive of shifts worked while assigned to the Field Training Program, the employee will be allowed to bid for shift and days off on a seniority basis. E. In order to provide scheduling protections to less senior employees, those without sufficient longevity to bid for an alternate shift assignment may request, via the Field Services Division Commander, a shift rotation for one (1) deployment quarter in a twelve (12) month period.. It shall be the sole responsibility of the junior employee wishing such a shift rotation to notify the Field Services. Division Commander immediately upon posting of each shift bidding schedule. F. In the event that a less junior employee qualifies for a shift rotation and desires to exercise their prerogative to rotate to another shift, the employee with the least seniority in the bidding process who has bid on a shift willbe "bumped" to an alternate shift in order to provide a shift opening for the junior employee. The senior employee shall retain the right to select the deployment quarter in which they will be displaced in the rotation. All other seniority rights shall remain in full force and effect. ARTICLE 30 -- EXTRA JOB SIGN-UPS A. Regular officers of the Hermosa Beach Police Department will be given priority over reserve officers in the assignment of extra jobs. No restrictions on the number of regular officers who can sign up for extra jobs shall be imposed. Officers and Sergeants will be compensated for all hours worked on an overtime basis for extra job sign-ups at time and one-half. B. To be eligible for an extra job, an officer must have completed their probationary period. The officer must have signed up for the job at least five (5) days prior to the date listed on the job posting. If no regular officer has signed up for the job five (5)'days prior to the listed date, the job may be assigned to a reserve officer. Available extra jobs will be posted on the bulletin board at least ten (10) daysin advance of the job date. C. In the matter of foot patrol and beach patrol jobs, a monthly schedule will be posted, when possible, at least five (5) days prior to the first day of the month. A sign-up list for foot patrol and beach patrol extra jobs will be posted at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the job for the following month. Failure to work a job assignment after having been selected to do so will be deemed to be a violation of general orders. For emergency reasons, an officermay provide a replacement for the extra job from one of the other regular officers to cover the assigned job. For the same reasons, and with the permission of the Division Commander, a reserve officer may be used as a replacement in an emergency situation. 25 Police Officers & Sergeants • • D. Nothing herein shall prohibit the City from hiring temporary civilian employees to perform police related duties in the enforcement of Municipal Code provisions relating to bicycles and skateboards. Any additional assignments of temporary civilian employees shall be subject to the meet and confer process. ARTICLE 31 — SHIFT COVERAGE If for any reason the Police Department cannot meet a minimum three-person staffing. standard requirement (consisting of Watch Commander and two area cars), the Department shall have the right to fill positions with Certified Level I Reserve Officers. This may be done only when all regular officers have been contacted to determine their availability to cover the shift or a portion of the shift, which will be understaffed. ARTICLE 32 — WATCH COMMANDER SELECTION The Chief of Police shall have the right to establish criteria for selection of officers to be placed on the Watch Commander's list. The Chief shall select any number to be placed on the list and may remove officers or add officers to the list at any time. ARTICLE 33 — PERFORMANCE REVIEW Upon completion of probation, each employee shall be reviewed annually; said review to be objective, constructive in nature designed to point out area of strengths, weakness and methods for improvement. The review will be completed by the employee's immediate supervisor and will include all co -lateral assignments (i.e. FTO, Rangemaster, Dare Officer, etc.). Contents of the form will be submitted to the Police Officers Association for -review and comments. ARTICLE 34 — DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS A. For the purpose of defining disciplinary actions, the following definitions shall be applicable: 1. Disciplinary actions are defined as: a. Dismissal b. Demotion c. Suspension d. Reductions in pay e. Reprimand (written) 2. Reductions in pay are governed by the "Blue Section" of the Police Manual. 3. Appeals from the disciplinary actions shall only be subject to the "Blue" section of the Police Manual entitled "Rules and Regulations." 26 Police Officers & Sergeants 4. Prior to the commencement of any internal investigation that is likely to subject the officer to disciplinary action, the officer shall be advised of their rightspursuant to Section 3300, et. seq., of the California Government Code as amended. All rights contained therein shall be applicable to the disciplinary actions and shall be used as a minimum guideline only. 5. Any reprimand record or other writing containing negative comments (with the exception of Performance Evaluations) included in the employees personnel package is a written reprimand. 6. Inclusionary, periods as currently set forth in the Police Department Rules and Regulations shall remain in effect during this MOU 7. Any officer receiving time off dispensed -as a result of disciplinary action can use either accumulated compensatory time or vacation time at their discretion. However, when exceptional circumstances arise and the City feels that it is in the best interest to keep an officer off duty for a limited period of time (not to exceed five (5) working days), the City may exercise this right. ' . 8. For purposes of this section, a "suspension day" imposed as a result of disciplinary action or "workday" referred to in Section 7 is equivalent to eight (8) hours. ARTICLE 35 — LAYOFF A. Hermosa Beach. Municipal Code Section 2.76.200 , as currently enacted, is the governing provision regarding layoff. However, City further agrees that, prior to implementation of any such layoff, discussions shall be held to explore other alternatives, mitigation, etc. B. It is further agreed that in the event the City should contract with another agency for provision of police services, the Association shall receive six (6)' months advance written notice prior to the effective date of any such change. ARTICLE 36 — NO SMOKING The parties agree that the City shall amend its class specifications for unit positions to provide that employees who become unit employees after the date this MOU goes into effect shall, as a condition of their continued employment, refrain from smoking tobacco or any other non -tobacco substance at any time on duty. Violation of this condition of employment shall be deemed good cause for dismissal. 27 Police Officers & Sergeants ARTICLE 37 — ASSOCIATION DIRECTORS TIME A maximum of two Board members shall be allowed to attend out of town meetings on City time up to and including a cumulative total of five (5) working days per calendar year provided such out of town meetings are for purposes of Association business. With the permission of the Police Chief additional days may be granted. ARTICLE 38 — DURATION OF CONTRACT This MOU is effective July 1, 2005 and shall remain in full force and effect through June 30, 2008. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Memorandum of Understanding this day of 2005. HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Jaime Ramirez Michael Earl, Personnel Director Donavan Sellan Viki Copeland, Finance Director Steve Saylor Nancy Cook 28 Police Officers & Sergeants July 7, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council t�.� 7;4'05-6Yo7 City Council Meeting of July 12, 2005 Resolution Approving Memorandum of Understanding Between the City and the Hermosa Beach Police Management Bargaining Unit. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Hermosa Beach Police Management Bargaining Unit. Background: The City Council directed staff to meet and confer with representatives of this employee group to discuss wages, hours, and working conditions contained in the' Memorandum of Understanding that expired on June 30, 2005. The parties have reached a tentative agreement'on the terms described below. The members of the employee group met and have approved the tentative agreement. The negotiated major changes include: 1. Term of the agreement is to be July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2008 2.. Salary increases of: 3.2% effective July 1, 2005 6% (including a 4% general increase and 2% market adjustment) effective July 1, 2006 6% (including a 4% general increase and 2% market adjustment) effective July 1, 2007 3. The City will provide retiree medical insurance for the employee based on age and years of service. 4. Clarifying language has been added regarding the current education reimbursement. The fiscal impact for this group is $32,136 for the 2005-2006 fiscal year; Funding for this has been included in Prospective Expenditures account of the 2005-2006 Budget. Respectfully submitted: Michel Earl Personnel & Risk Mana4ement Director Cour/ St '• he : urrell City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 05- • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE MANAGEMENT BARGAINING UNIT WHEREAS, employees of the City of Hermosa Beach, California represented by the Hermosa Beach Police Management Bargaining Unit, have elected to meet and confer with the City of Hermosa Beach on matters concerning wages, hours, and working conditions; and, WHEREAS, the above personnel have selected certain individuals to represent them; and WHEREAS, Employee and Management representatives have jointly negotiated a Memorandum of Understanding which has been ratified by a majority vote of the members of the Hermosa Beach Police Management Bargaining Unit; and WHEREAS, the Employee and Management representatives have mutually agreed to recommend that the City Council adopt this Memorandum of Understanding. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City, of Hermosa Beach resolves to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding to be effective for the period of July 1, 2005 through and including June 30, 2008. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2005 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney 2 Police Management •EMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANG BETWEEN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND POLICE MANAGEMENT BARGAINING GROUP JULY 1, 2005 JUNE 30., 2008 Police Management MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE POLICE MANAGEMENT BARGAINING GROUP ARTICLE 1 — PARTIES TO THE MEMORANDUM This Memorandum of Understanding, hereinafter referred to as the "MOU" or the "Agreement," has been entered into, pursuant to the laws of the State of California and the City of Hermosa Beach, California, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as the "City" or. as "Management," and the HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, hereinafter referred to as the "Association." ARTICLE 2 — RECOGNITION Pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, (Government Code 3500, et seq.), the 'City agrees to, and does, recognize the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association as the exclusive representative of the full-time positions in the classifications of Police Captain and Police Lieutenant of the City of Hermosa Beach. ARTICLE 3 — SCOPE & IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING A. This memorandum of understanding constitutes the joint recommendation of Management and the Association. It shall not be binding in whole or in part upon the parties unless and until the following conditions have been complied with: 1. The association shall notify the City Council in writing that it has formally approved the Memorandum of Understanding in its entirety. 2. The City Council shall approve this Memorandum of Understanding. 3. This MOU has been reached following good -faith negotiations, by the authorized Management representative of the City Council and the authorized representative for the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association. • ARTICLE 4 — JOB ACTION • A. The Association and its members agree that during the term of this MOU there shall be no strike. B. In the event of an unauthorized strike, the City agrees that there will be no liability on the part of the Association provided the Association promptly and publicly disavows such unauthorized action; orders the employees to return to work and attempts to bring about a prompt resumption of normal operations; and provided further, that the Association notifies the City in writing, within 48 hours after the commencement of such strike, what measures it has taken to comply with the provisions of this strike. C. In the event such strike by the Association has not affected resumption of normal work practices, the. City shall have the right to take appropriate disciplinary action. ARTICLE 5 — NON-DISCRIMINATION Both parties to this Agreement agree not to discriminate against any employee or applicant because ofage, gender, race, national origin, religion, color, ancestry, marital status, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, medical condition, and/or Association membership or activity. Additionally, the City expects and requires all employees to treat one another with dignity and respect. Harassment of fellow employees is a violation of law. No employment decision may be made based upon an employee's submission to or rejection of such conduct. It is the responsibility of any employee, who believes that they are the victim of such harassment, whether sexual, racial, ethnic or religious, to report the conduct to their Division Commander, Chief of Police, Personnel Director or the City Manager in a timely manner. ARTICLE 6 — MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 1. Manage the City. 2. Schedule working hours. 3. Establish, modify or change work schedules or standards. 4. Institute changes in procedures. 5. Direct the work force, including the right to hire, promote, demote, transfer, suspend, discipline or discharge any employee. 6. Determine the location of any new facilities, building, departments, divisions, or subdivisions thereof, and the relocation, sale, leasing or closing of facilities, departments, divisions, or subdivisions thereof 7. Determine services to be rendered. 8. Determine the layout of buildings and equipment and materials to be used herein. 9. Determine processes, techniques, methods and means of performing work. 10. Determine the size, character and use of inventories. 11. Determine the financi.olicy including accounting procedu•. 12. Determine the administrative organization of the system. 13. Determine the selection, promotion, or transfer of employees. 14. Determine the size and characteristics of the work force. 15. Determine the allocation and assignment of work to employees. 16. Determine policy affecting the selection of new employees. 17. Determine the establishment of quality and quantity standards and the judgment of quality and quantity of work required. 18. Determine administration of discipline. 19. Determine control and use of City property, materials and equipment. 20. Schedule work periods and determine the number and duration of work periods. 21. Establish, modify, eliminate or enforce rules and regulations. 22. Place work with outside firms. 23. Determine the kinds and numbers of personnel necessary. 24. Determine the methods and means by which such operations are to be conducted. 25. Require employees, where necessary, to take in-service training courses during working hours. 26. Determine duties to be included in any job classifications. 27. Determine the necessity of overtime and the amount of overtime required. 28. Take any necessary action to carry out the mission of the City in cases of an emergency. A. The exercise of the foregoing powers, rights authority, duties and responsibilities by the City, the adoption of policies, rules, regulations and practices in furtherance thereof, and the use of judgment and the discretion in connection therewith, shall be limited only by the specific and express terms of this Memorandum of Understanding, City Personnel Ordinance and Personnel Rules and Regulations, the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights, and other statutory laws. B. Except in emergencies, or where the City is required to make changes in its operations because of the requirements of law, whenever the exercise of management's rights shall impact on employees of the bargaining unit, the City agrees to meet and confer with representatives of the Association, upon request by the Association, regarding the impact of the exercise of such rights unless the matter of the exercise of such rights is provided for in this Memorandum of Understanding. • : • ARTICLE 7 — PROVISIONS OF LAW — INSEPARABILITY It is mutually understood that this MOU is, and shall be, subject to all current and future applicable state, federal and. local laws. If any article, part, provision or segment of this MOU is, or shall be, in conflict with or inconsistent with such applicable provisions of federal, state or local law, or is otherwise held to be invalid, or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction by final decree, such article, part or provision thereof shall be superseded by such applicable law and the remainder of this MOU shall in no way be affected thereby. ARTICLE 8 — FULL UNDERSTANDING, MODIFICATION, WAIVER A. It is intended that this Agreement sets forth the full and entire understanding of the parties regarding the matters set forth herein, and any other prior to existing understanding or agreements by the parties whether formal or informal, regarding any such matters are hereby superseded or terminated in their entirety. B. Except as specifically provided herein, it is agreed and understood that each party hereto voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives its right, and agrees that the other shall not be required to negotiate with respect to any subject or matter covered herein during the term of this Agreement. C. Any agreement, alteration, understanding, variation, waiver, or modification of any of the terms or provisions contained hereinshall not be binding upon the parties hereto unless made and executed in writing by all parties hereto, and if required, approved and implemented by the City Council. D. The waiver of any breach, term or condition of this Agreement by either party shall not constitute a precedent in the future enforcement of all its terms and provisions. ARTICLE 9 — GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE The Grievance Procedure is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, by reference. ARTICLE 10 — WORK SCHEDULE A. Police Captains and Police Lieutenants shall have the choice of working a ten (10) hour day, four (4) days per work week; or an eight (8) hour day, five (5) days per work week. B. In the event of an emergency situation, the City may cancel, alter or amend the work schedule as necessary immediately. ARTICLE 11 —.COMPENSATION - METHODS OF COMPENSATION A. Methods of compensation: 1. Compensation shall be determined on a monthly salary basis. 2. Payments due shall be paid on a semi-monthly basis unless otherwise mutually agreed. By mutual consent early payments and other modifications can be made. 3. Base monthly salary shall be considered the rate of pay for a particular classification without consid•on of any other form of compensate. B. Salary Advancements Within Base Pay Range: 1. Step Advancement: a. All salary advances shall be based on merit and fitness. All increases shall be recommended by the Department Head and approved by the Personnel Officer/City Manager. In the cases of exceptional merit, and upon the recommendation of the Department Director, an employee may, with the approval of the City Manager, be advanced a step within the salary range at other than one year intervals. Such advancements shall establish a new anniversary date for future advancements.. Merit increases shall be effective at the beginning of the next pay period (1st or 16 of month). b. Upon the successful and satisfactory completion of twelve (12) months service, employees shall be advanced one step within their range and yearly thereafter until the maximum within the range achieved. 2. Promotion a. An employee who is promoted to a position in a class with a higher salary rate shall be entitled to the lowest step in the higher range which exceeds the present rate of pay (including base salary plus education/longevity pay) with the intent of increasing the salary rate in the new classification (base salary plus education/longevity pay) by at least 5%. ARTICLE 12 — BASE SALARY A. Effective July 1, 2005 the base salary ranges for the classifications represented by the Association shall be as follows: Police Captain 8,027 8,427 8,851 9,293 Police Lieutenant 7,507 7,881 8,277 8,689 B. Effective July 1, 2006, the base monthly salaries for represented classifications shall be increased by 6%. Effective July 1, 2007, the base monthly salaries for represented classifications shall be increased by 6%. C. Upon commencement of 21 years service as a sworn peace officer in Hermosa Beach, employee will receive an additional 5% salary. ARTICLE 13 — CERTIFCATE PAY Effective January 1, 2004, employees shall be eligible to receive additional compensation of 5% of base salary for possession of a POST Management Certificate. •RTICLE 14 — EXEMPT EMPLOYS The Classifications of Police Captain and Police Lieutenant are designated as exempt under FLSA. ARTICLE 15 — INSURANCE COVERAGE A. LIFE 1. City shall provide a life insurance policy for each employee, payable in the amount of two times annual salary. B. MENTAL HEALTH 1. City,shall make such a plan available to City employees; the full cost to be paid by the employee. C. VISION 1. City shall make such, a plan available to City employees; the full cost to be paid by the employee. D. MEDICAL 1. City shall provide for Association members a medical insurance plan to include a choice of an annuity plan with $250.00 deductible or an HMO plan; both plans to include maternity care and prescription benefits. The current medical plan or its equivalent, to remain in force during the term of this MOU. City shall meet and consult should there be a change in providers. ? The HMO plan shall have no greater than a $5.00 office visit and prescription co -pay during the term of this Agreement. 3. City to pay employee costs and current dependent rate with any future increased dependent costs to be borne 80% City and 20% employee. E. DENTAL 1. City shall provide for Association members a dental insurance plan to include a choice of an indemnity plan or a pre -paid plan: 2 City to pay employee cost and current dependent rate with . any future increased dependent costs to be borne 80% City and 20% employee. ARTICLE 16 — DEFERRED COMPENSATION City agrees to make available to all employees in the Unit either of the Citywide Deferred Compensation Plans. All participants being then eligible to vote on decisions of the Deferred Compensation Committee. ARTICLE 17 — RETIREMENT • A. The City shall maintain the 3% @ 50 PERS contract with "One Year Final Compensation" in effect at the time of this contract. B. The City will pay the employee's 9% contribution to the P.E.R.S. retirement system credited to the employee's portion. C. Effective November 1, 1995, the City shall commence reporting to P.E.R.S. the value of the 9% employer paid member contribution (EPMC) pursuant to the authority of Government Code section 20023(c)(4). D. Retiree medical insurance stipends provided to employees who retired prior to July 1, 2005 shall remain at existing amounts. Employees covered by this agreement who retire from the City of Hermosa Beach after July 1, 2005 will be eligible for the following medical insurance benefits: 1 For retirement at age fifty (50), or for disability retirement (no age restriction), with a minimum of twenty (20) years total full-time sworn police service with the City, the City will pay an amount up to the employee only HMO premium available through the City's medical insurance provider. 2. For retirement at age fifty-five (55) with a minimum of fifteen (15) years total full-time service with the City, the City will pay an amount up to the employee only HMO rate available through the City's medical insurance provider. 3. Said benefit shall commence with the first month following the employee's retirement in which the employee is responsible for payment of the insurance premium. 4. In order to be eligible for medical supplement payments, an employee must either remain on a medical insurance plan offered by the City or provide proof of coverage on a self -procured medical insurance plan. 5. Any payments made by the City shall normally be made directly to a medical insurance provider. However, other payment arrangements may be considered. 6. Any employee receiving a benefit under this article agrees to apply for, and enroll in, any Federal and/or State medical insurance plan (e.g. Medicare, Medicaid, etc.) for which they may become eligible. 7. Upon enrollment in Medicare, the City agrees to pay the premium for purchasing coverage equivalent to the benefits provided under the existing Medicare "Part B" program. . ARTICLE 18 — LEAVE OF ABSENCE Management agrees to allow all employees covered by this MOU to take a leave of absence without pay, not to exceed 60 days, in conjunction with, or in addition to, their regular vacation time. This leave will only be allowed every other year. Timing and duration of leave is subject to approval of the Chief of Police and subject tee needs of the department. This *vision shall not reduce any leave entitlement an employee may have under the Military and Veterans Code. • ARTICLE 19 — VACATION • A. Vacation accrual rates shall be as follows: 1. Upon hire, at the rate of 96 hours/year. - 2. Commencing with the 7th year, at the rate of 112 hours/year. 3. Commencing with the 8th year, at the rate of 136 hours/year. 4. Commencing with the 15th year, at the rate of 160 hours/year. 5. Commencing with the 16th year, at the rate of 168 hours/year. 6. Commencing with the 17th year, at the rate of 176 hours/year. B. An employee covered by this Agreement may accrue vacation time to a maximum of 270 hours. Cash out of any earned but unused vacation accrual in excess of 270 hours (as of September 30 of each year) shall be automatically cashed out as part of the October 20th payroll. ARTICLE 20 - HOLIDAYS A The following holidays shall be considered as paid: New Year's Day; Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Birthday; Presidents' Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day; Labor Day; Veteran's Day; Thanksgiving Day; Day after Thanksgiving; Christmas Day ARTICLE 21 — SICK LEAVE A. Sick leave accrual shall be as follows: 1. Those employees having less than 176 accrued hours of sick leave shall accrue sick leave at the rate of 6 hours per month until their accrual accumulates to 176 hours at which time their accrual shall be 8 hours per month. 2. A once a year cash -in can be up to 100% of the unused sick leave as long as at least 176 accrued hours remains on hand. An employee may accrue a maximum of three hundred and fifty hours (350); thereafter any excess shall be cashed out. Employees who have more than 350 hours of sick time on the books as of June 1, 1988 shall be frozen at that accumulation; any sick time in excess of that amount shall be cashed out. B. Employees shall receive cash out of 100% of unused sick leave upon resignation, retirement, or termination. C. In the case of serious illness of a member of the immediate family, the employee may utilize sick leave. Immediate family for the purpose of this section shall be defined as: father; mother; father-in-law; mother-in-law; brother; sister; spouse; or legal dependent. Employees may predesignate and substitute other members for those members defined as "immediate family". The intent of this provision is not to expand the number of persons included in the definition of "immediate family" no•increase paid leave opportunities,* rather, to recognize variation in family structure (e.g. stepmother for mother). ARTICLE 22 — BEREAVEMENT LEAVE Each employee shall receive a maximum of three shifts per calendar year to be utilized for bereavement leave because of a death in their immediate family. Immediate family shall be defined as in Article 21 - Sick Leave. Said time will not be cumulative from one twelve month period to another nor will pay in lieu of unused leave for bereavement be provided. The Chief of Police may grant one (1) additional shift in the event of a death which required extended travel. ARTICLE 23 — MANAGEMENT LEAVE Police Captains and Police Lieutenants shall be allowed one hundred (100) hours of additional leave each calendar year in addition to flex time for extraordinary assignments, fixed holidays and bereavement leave. Management leave does not accumulate or carry over; it must be used each year. Said Management Leave shall have no monetary value. ARTICLE 24 — EDUCATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT The City agrees that Police Captains and Police Lieutenants who desire to enroll in trainingand academic courses •that may provide the employee with general or specific skills and/or knowledge that contributes to their ability to perform their current position or enhances promotional opportunities, shall have their course fees (up to CSU rate), books, materials, and tuition (CSU rate) paid by the City, in advance, subject to the approval of the City Manager. The employee will reimburse the City for all expenses if the employee fails or does not complete the courses. An annual fiscal year maximum reimbursement amount will be determined by the Personnel Director using CSU rates. The amount will be determined based on the CSU schedule for attending a Fall semester, one winter session, a Spring semester, and one summer session. ARTICLE 25 — UNIFORM ALLOWANCE Said allowance for Police Captains and Police Lieutenants to be $600 per year, payable through the regular payroll schedule. ARTICLE 26 — AMMUNITION REPLACEMENT A. In addition to the quarterly qualification ammunition, each officer will be allowed to utilize fifty (50) rounds of ammunition for their primary duty weapon, at City expense, each month at the firing range used by the Department. The City will also pay for the expense of using the range. The ammunition will be used to practice on an approved course of fire so that officers will become more proficient with their service weapons. B. The City will not compensate officers for the time spent to utilize this ammunition. Officers must use the allotted ammunition each month; it does not accumulate. ARTICLE 27 — DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS A. For the purpose of defining disciplinary actions, the following definitions shall be applicable: 1. Dismissal 2. Demotion 3. Suspension 4. Reductions in pay 5. Reprimand. (written) B. Reductions in pay are governed by the 'Blue Section" of the Police Manual. C. Appeals from the disciplinary actions shall only be subject to the `Blue" section of the Police Manual entitled "Rules and Regulations". D. Prior to the commencement of •any internal investigation which is likely to subject the officer to disciplinary action, the officer shall be advised of their rights pursuant to Section 3300, et. seq., of the California Government code as amended. All rights contained therein shall be applicable to the disciplinary actions and shall be used as a minimum guideline only. E. Any reprimand record or other writing containing negative comments (with the exception of Performance Evaluations) included in the employees personnel package is a written reprimand. F Inclusionary periods as currently set forth in the Police Department rules and Regulations shall remain in effect during this MOU G. Any officer receiving time off dispensed as a" result of disciplinary action can use either accumulated compensatory time or vacation time at their discretion. However, when exceptional circumstances arise and the City feels that it is in the best interest to keep an officer off duty for a limited period of time (not to exceed five (5) working days),. the City may exercise this right. ARTICLE 28 — LAYOFF A. Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2-42 as currently enacted, is the governing provision regarding layoff. However, City further agrees that prior to implementation of any such layoff, discussions shall be held to explore other alternatives, mitigation, etc. B. It is further agreed that in the event the City should contract with another agency for provision of police services, the Association shall receive six (6) months advance notice prior to the effective date of any such change. ARTICLE 29 — NO SMOKING The parties agree that the City shall amend its class specifications for unit positions to provide that employees who become unit employees after March 1, 1988 shall, as a condition of their continued employment, refrain from smoking tobacco or any other non -tobacco substance at any time on or off duty. Violation of this condition of employment shall be deemed good cause for dismissal. 'PARTICLE 30 - ANNUAL PHYSIC. A. All employees covered by this Agreement shall be provided with a complete physical examination (participation is voluntary) according to the following schedule: 1. Every two (2) years up to and including age 38. 2. Annually at age 39 and thereafter. B. Said physical to be at a location of the City's choice and at the City's expense. C. The physical exam is to include at least the following: 1. Review of medical history, physical examination; Urinalysis; VDRL; X -Rays (Chest PA, Lumbar Spine and Cervical) only if indicated; Blood groupings, CBC, Chem Panel 17; EKG and Treadmill; Lipid. Analysis; Pulmonary Function Test; Hearing test; Strength and Flexibility testing. IIIT ICLE 31 DURATION OF CONSCT This MOU is effective July 1, 2005 andshall remain in full force and effect through June 30, 2008. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Memorandum of Understanding this day of 2005. HERMOSA BEACH POLICE MANAGEMENT GROUP CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Tom Eckert Police Captain Michael A. Earl. Personnel Director Tom Bohlin Viki Copeland Police Lieutenant Finance Director Lance Jaakola Police Lieutenant • July 6, 2005 ����" Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 12, 2005. BONNIE BRAE UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT (UUD) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the following actions for the Bonnie Brae UUD: 1. Award of Contract to David Taussig & Associates, Inc. in the amount of $30,000 to provide Assessment Engineering services; 2. Award of Contract to Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth in the amount �f $41,000 to provide Bond Counsel services; 3. Award of Contract to Northcross, Hill & Ach in the amount of $25;000 as Financial Advisors for bond sales; 4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the above contracts on behalf of the City; and 5. Advance $30,000 from the Contingency Fund to the Bonnie Brae UUD to fund the contract services of David Taussig & Associates. Summary: The Bonnie Brae Underground Utility District (UUD) is bounded by Prospect Avenue, Aviation Boulevard, PCH and 18th Street. There are approximately 180 parcels within this district and the total cost is estimated to be approximately $3,000,000. Southern California Edison and Verizon have completed their designs and Adelphia is working on their design for this project. The next step is to begin the process of formation of the, district. Staff recommends staying with the assessment district team utilized on previous districts David Taussig & Associates, Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, and Craig Hill of Northcross, Hill & Ach. Taussig & Associates will develop the District Boundary Map and determine the spread of assessments. The $30,000 contract .amount will cover all their expenses through preparation of the Engineer's Report, balloting and preparing the Assessment Role. The cost for these services must be advanced by the City but will be reimbursed by the District upon successful formation The Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth contract amount of $41,000 includes the basic service amount of $25,000 for a bond sale of $1,000,000 to $2,500,000. If the bond sale exceeds $2,500,000 then there is extra fee of 1/10 of 1% of the exceedance amount. An extra $1,000 is included to provide for this possibility. There is also a $15,000 fee for issuance of a. disclosure statement. If the bonds are privately placed with an investor, as has been done in the recent past, then no disclosure statement was required. Because this is a much larger bond amount, it will be competitively bid and require a disclosure • statement. In addition to these costs, the City will also pay any out - 2n of -pocket expenses that Tlay be incurred. These costs are n paid until the formation is successfully completed and is paid using District assessment funds. Craig Hill, as Financial Advisor, will assist the City in the sale of bonds to fund the District improvements. His costs are also not paid until the formation is successfully completed and is paid using District assessment funds. Fiscal Impact: The advance of $30,000 from the Contingency Fund to 310-8105-4201 (Bonnie Brae UUD) will be reimbursed if the UUD is successfully formed. Respectfully submitted, Richard �. organ, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: • Step 119Burre City Manager H:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\02-105 Bonnie Brae UUD auth 7-12-05.doc 2 C 01 D. ( d'f x,60 CONTINUED FROM JUNE 28, 2005 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7 / [�2..S June 21, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 05-4 ZONE CHANGE 05-4; 19 2ND STREET APPELLANTS: GARY AND CINDI WELLS 24449 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD TORRANCE, CA 90505 REQUEST: Regular Meeting of June 28, 2005 TO APPEAL THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND ZONE CHANGE FROM C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) TO R-3 (MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) Planning Commission Recommendation: 1. Deny the requested General Plan Amendment, and Zone Change by adopting the attached Resolution to sustain the Planning Commission's decision. Background: PROJECT INFORMATION GENERAL PLAN: ZONING: LOT SIZE: EXISTING USE:. UNITS ALLOWED IF R-3 ZONE: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Neighborhood Commercial (HD Residential Proposed) C-1 (R-3 proposed) 3,838 Square Feet Duplex 2 Units Negative Declaration (Initial Study on file). At their meeting of May 17, 2005, The Planning Commission voted 4:0 to deny the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. The City Council previously considered this request in February, 2003 and unanimously voted to sustain the prior decision of the Planning Commission to deny the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, finding that the existing General Plan and Zone should not be changed as they represent the appropriate depth for commercial or mixed use development for this location. There have been no material changes in the use or development of surrounding properties since this request was denied. The Planning Commission approved the condominium project only contingent upon Council approval of the General Plan Amendment and. Zone Change. The subject lot is located on the north side of Second Street and is the second lot east of the neighborhood commercial development that fronts on Hermosa Avenue (currently a restaurant). 5a • • The lot is located at a depth of 60 to 93 feet from Hermosa Avenue and abuts Beach Drive on the west. The intervening property between the subject site and the restaurant (25 2"d Street) is also developed with a duplex. The property is one of three lots located between Hermosa Avenue and Beach Drive designated Neighborhood Commercial on the General Plan Map, and C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) on the official City Zoning Map. The C-1 zoning for the site does not allow exclusive residential use, and only permits residential use as part of mixed-use project with commercial use on the ground floor. The subject lot is currently developed with a duplex, constructed in the 1920's. The commercial designation for this block between Hermosa Avenue and Beach Drive dates back to the oldest City land use and zoning maps. The Hermosa Avenue fronting property to the south contains a mix of service and retail commercial uses on both sides of the street, while directly across the Hermosa Avenue the property is developed residentially and zoned R-3. The Hermosa Avenue fronting property located to the south across 2"d street is also zoned C-1 and formerly was a restaurant use, but is currently vacant. On June 20, 2005, the property owner submitted a project to build a mixed- use project (one unit above ground floor commercial) on this site. The properties to the west and north are residential. (See the attached aerial photo and existing land use map). The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of January 6, 2005, recommended an environmental negative declaration for the proposed General Plan Amendment/Zone Change, since it does not change the existing use of the site. Analysis - General Plan Amendment / Zone Change The applicant's request to redesignate and rezone the property to HD Residential and R-3 will allow exclusive residential use of the lot and allow a 2 -unit condominium project concurrent with this General Plan Amendment/Zone Change. A two -unit development results in a density that is consistent with surrounding residential densities and compatible with the development pattern of the area to the south and west, and on the East Side of Hermosa Avenue. Approval of this change will preclude any possible future expansion of the Hermosa Avenue fronting commercial property through to the alley for either commercial use or a mixed use project. Assembling this property with the frontage property and the intervening property at 25 2nd Street would encourage higher quality commercial projects or add commercial parking to improve existing commercial activity. The assembly of this property for a commercial project is improbable given that both this lot and 25 2' Street (also currently a duplex) will have to be combined with the Hermosa Avenue fronting commercial lot, and the current residential use is probably a more valuable use of the property than a commercial use. However, the properties could also be assembled for a mixed-use project, with ground floor commercial and residential above, which probably is a viable alternative as evidenced by the project at 30-44 Hermosa Avenue. Recent direction from the City Council on the issue of commercial depths along P .C.H. has been generally to maintain commercial depths and not allow encroachment of residential uses, with only a couple of exceptions. The issue of commercial depth in neighborhood commercial areas along Hermosa Avenue has only bee been discussed in connection with this same request two years ago. 4 The General Plan designation of Neighborhood Commercial is described as follows: This category includes convenience stores, Laundromats and similar uses designed to primarily serve local walk- in traffic. (page 26 Land Use Element). The purpose of the C -I, Neighborhood Commercial Zone as described in the Zoning Ordinance (Section 17.26.020(B) is to provide sites for mix of small local businesses appropriate for, and serving the daily needs of nearby residential neighborhood. while establishing land use regulations that prevent significant adverse effects on abutting residential uses. The applicant argues that the opportunities for commercial use of this property are very limited because of the size of the lot and the fact that it is isolated from other commercial uses or lots and is not connected by ownership to the Hermosa Avenue fronting lot. The applicant also argues that its lack of viability as a commercial propertyis shown by the fact that its current use has not changed, and by their unsuccessful efforts to sell this property in the past two years as a C-1 property. The applicant has prepared a comparative fiscal revenue analysis, which estimates property tax, sales tax, UUT, and business license revenue that can be expected from the existing use, a 2 -unit residential condominium, and a mixed-use commercial/residential project that is currently allowed under the zoning. The hypothetical mixed commercial/residential project encompasses all three parcels on the block since the applicant argues that development of this single lot, as a mixed use is infeasible. The residential condominium use is expected to generate the most revenue at $8,500 annually, the subject parcel's portion of a mixed-use project will generate $5,960, and the existing use generates $1,900. However, the study is deficient relative to commercial and mixed use developments in three ways. First, the estimates are based upon a two unit condominium rather than three units which are permitted and can be developed on the combined lots as described in the study. The size of such condominium development would equal or exceed the size of condominium developments throughout the city. Second, the retail area is overstated in the study development program and the assumed project of 2 units and more commercial development generates less revenue from a property tax standpoint than what can practically be built on the property. Although the sales tax generated is greater in this case, it contributes less than the property tax revenue and overstating it in the proforma undervalues the mixed use project. Finally, the study misrepresents what can be built in the city. It says a single lot mixed use project cannot be built practically, but a similar project on a smaller lot across the street is proposed and will be heard by Planning Commission in July. It also misrepresents that a combined lot mixed use project will not be built but one is currently under construction Y2 block from the property. So the facts don't support the applicant's study that mixed use on one lot or three combined lots cannot be built and the revenue estimates are just inaccurate and should not be used to evaluate the proposed zone change.' Conclusion: The City Council has previously resisted re -designating commercially zoned property in the City and specifically rejected this same request two years ago. Also, the property can currently be developed with neighborhood -oriented commercial with residential units above either on its own, or if developed in combination with the adjacent lots on the block. Further, there have been no • • changes in the development and use of surroundings, or any change in City Council policy regarding these types of requests since the last time it was considered. Ken Robertson Senior Planner lumenfela, Ditector Community D4velopment Department Step City ' anager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution sustaining the Commission's denial of GP and Zone Change 2. Maps (Location, General Plan, Zoning) 3. Aerial Photo Separate attachment: Correspondence from applicant, including fiscal analysis Notes: 1. The estimates for the mixed-use development project are based on a project that would require assembly of the subject lot and the adjacent two lots on this block on the south side of ri Street. The report argues that a mixed use project is considered unlikely because of the difficulty of assembling the parcels and the hypothetical project includes two rental units and 3,750 sq. ft. of retail development. The required parking for the retail use is 15 spaces plus 5 spaces for condominium/apartments. The comparative analysis does not evaluate other potential mixed-use development scenarios of assembled parcels, which could include residential condominiums (as many as 7 units would be allowed with required parking) and a smaller proportion of commercial square footage. Also the fiscal analysis does not project fiscal revenue over time, which would show that annual sales tax revenue from commercial uses may increase, while property tax revenue remains rather static because of the limitations of Proposition 13. P:/192ndZCGP 3 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • RESOLUTION 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (C-1) TO MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) FOR THE PROPERTY . LOCATED AT 19 SECOND STREET AND LEGALLY. DESCRIBED AS LOT 12, BLOCK 3, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Gary Wells owner of property at 19 Second Street seeking to amend the General Plan Map and the Zoning Map for the subject property. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on May 17, 2005, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Based on this evidence and testimony the Planning Commission denied the request. Section 3. The applicant filed, an appeal of the Planning Commission decision. Section 4. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the applicant's appeal of the Planning Commission denial of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on July 12, 2005, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the City Council. Section 5. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, and the record of decision of the Planning Commission, the City Council makes the following factual findings: 1. The property is designated Neighborhood Commercial on the General Plan Map, and Neighborhood Commercial on the official City Zoning Map. The C-1 zoning for the site allows local neighborhood oriented commercial uses or residential use with ground floor commercial as part of a mixed-use project. 2. The requested change will reduce the depth of the commercial designated property, as measured from Hermosa Avenue westward, from 93 to 60 feet, and replace the commercial designations on the subject property to allow residential development for up to two units consistent with the High Density Residential classification of the General Plan and the R-3 Zoning district in the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The property at 19 2nd Street has been in continuing use for residential since the 1920's and perhaps earlier. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • 4. Surrounding property to the north and west is designated High Density Residential on the General Plan and zoned R-3, which allows residential development up to a density of 33 units per acre, and is currently developed with a mix of multi -family uses. Section 6. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings pertaining to the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change: 1. The proposed amendment to the General Plan Map to reduce the depth of the Neighborhood Commercial designation by excluding 19 2nd Street, from 93 feet to 60 feet, is not in the best interest of the City with respect to long-term land use and development at the Hermosa Avenue and 2°a Street intersection. 2. The General Plan Map accurately depicts the appropriate depth for neighborhood commercial development and long-term land use and development of this area. 3. Reducing the potential depth for commercial development would preclude the opportunity for new commercial activity or the expansion of existing commercial development along the subject segment of Hermosa Avenue. Section 7. Based on the foregoing findings, the City Council hereby denies the request to amend the Land Use Map of the General Plan. Section 8. By virtue of the denial of the proposed General Plan Amendment, it would be contrary to State Law to approve the Zone. Change because such a change would render the zoning designation inconsistent with the general plan designation. Therefore, the Zone Change is hereby denied. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of ,2005 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY zcrl9denial 4 : WALK ' 4TH 10 �o n v M 14 - ! .$5 ST t /00 0 �Od f0 I�` z rr , —D{, /00 Z 0, V /00 /00./7 k 7'JI'3D• J.4 ✓0 • J0 8LK . 103 Jo Jo ~0947 teo 00 4188-oti ST. P.50'09 D 0 ADDRESS: 19 2ND STREET SCALE 1" it 100' •N o� ONTINENTAL MAPPING SERVICE 6325 Van Nuys Boulevard. Van Nuys, CA 91401 ,DID\ 7D7 • e-4 if 8 7 r 998 CODE -4340 269 WALK 80 3ao<VAC.> ST. Ls! fiR IC TED IfIle AREA • 3RD tb 4 S T. cal 0 cc 1-- cr) '1/44 3R0. CT. Z6 FOR PREV. ASSMT. SEE: 4188 - 7 1 eo ,AIS Subieck Lc4 Prorese_j Foy 2ND d'uot S T. HERMOSA BEACH M.B. 1-25-26 1 ZONING MAP 9 FZ GENERAL PLAN MAP 0 XYMaps - 19 2nd Street Page 1 of 1 /1 http://xymaps/servlet/com.esri. esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=HermosaBeach OV&ClientVersi... 06/23/2005 • STEVE KAPLAN ATTORNEY AT LAW r May 11, 2005 Planning Commission City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attention: Ken Robertson Senior Planner, Community Development Department Re: Property located at 19 2"d Street Members of the Planning Commission: RECEIVED MAY 1 1 Vil5 COM. DEV. OEP:[ The undersigned represents Gary and Cindi Wells, the owners of the above referenced property and the applicants with respect to the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Precise Development Plan, Condominium CUP and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map applications to be heard before the Planning Commission on the evening of May 17th. The purpose of this letter is to detail our reasons for seeking the support of the Planning 'Commission in approving (1) the change of the General Plan designation of my client's property from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential and the corresponding zoning designation from C-1 to R-3; and (2) the Precise Plan, CUP and subdivision map applications filed to effect the development of a 2 -unit condominium project. Please find outlined below our positions in support of the filed applications: 1. The Planning Commission in November of 2002 denied my client's request for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change finding that the existing General Plan and Zoning designations were the appropriate dcpth for commercial or mixed-use developments for the subject location. In the instant filing, the applicants ask that this Planning Commission reconsider said finding for the reasons discussed below. The General Plan designation of Neighborhood Commercial is described at page 26 of the Land Use Element as follows: "This category includes convenience stores, Laundromats and similar uses designed to primarily serve local walk-in traffic (bolded emphasis added)." The purpose of the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial Zone, as described in Section 17.26.020(B) of the Zoning Ordinance is "to provide sites for a mix of small local businesses appropriate for, and serving the daily needs of nearby residential neighborhoods (bolded emphasis added)..." 1219 MORNINGSIDE DRIVE SUITE 212 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 PHONE (310) 802.1230 FAX (310) 802.0060 E-MAIL SIKREATTY@A'OL.COM Hermosa Beach Planning Commission May 11, 2005 Page 2 The reclassification of my client's property to the requested designations will not prejudice the goals of the above stated city policies. The 60 -foot cumulative depth from Hermosa Avenue of the two properties to the east of my client's lot is sufficient in order to provide for the types of uses encouraged by the above quoted city guidelines. The walk-up trade contemplated by the neighborhood commercial designation does not demand extensive parking allocation. The realistic use of my client's property in any commercial or mixed-use development would be for parking...parking that is not required for a true walk-up neighborhood clientele. In addition, the classification of the subject property as commercial cannot be justified because 1) the property does not fronton Hermosa Avenue; 2) the opportunities for commercial use are limited, or non-existent, due to the small size of the lot and its isolation from other commercial uses and/or lots; and 3) the properties directly north, east and west of the subject lot are classified as residential. Although as noted in the Planning Department staff report, the approval of these applications will preclude future expansion of the Hermosa Avenue commercial frontage through to the Beach Drive alley, such expansive development is improbable given that both the subject lot and 25 2nd Street must be combined with the Hermosa Avenue fronting commercial lot. It is the opinion of the undersigned that the truest barometer of the best use for property is the marketplace. My clients have been unable to sell their property as a commercial site for over two years. No development proposals or offers have been received by the 3 separate owners of the lots bounded by Hermosa Avenue and Second Street seeking to consolidate said properties into one integrated commercial project. If a demand existed for an integrated commercial use of said properties, such proposals or offers would have already transformed the site. Accordingly, I believe the request to change the General Plan and Zoning designations of my client's property is both reasonable and justified. 2. Although the goal of promoting larger, integrated neighborhood commercial developments along secondary arterial streets is understandable, including the potential of creating and increasing annual fiscal revenues for the city, the policy has not achieved its desired end result in the instant case. Included in the materials submitted to the planning staff is a Comparative Fiscal Revenue Projection from the firm of Lee Kosmont Advisory Services. The conclusion of this report indicates that the city will receive more annual fiscal revenue from my client's proposed two - /3 Hermosa Beach Planning Commission May 11, 2005 Page 3 unit condominium project than it presently receives from the existing site uses or from a hypothetical mixed-use development of the site. For all of the reasons discussed above, request is hereby made to the Planning Commission to approve all of the entitlement applications filed concerning the property located at 19 2nd Street. Thank you for your consideration of this material and I look forward to appearing before you next Tuesday evening. Sincerely, Gary and Cindi Wells Srour & Associates 4 e J osmont ADVISORY SERVICES Memorandum R!C lVRO MAY 11?POi COM. DEV. DEP': To: Steve Kaplan, Esq. From: Ross S. Selvidge, Ph.D Date: April 21, 2005 Subject: Comparative Fiscal Revenue Projection for 19 2°d Street, Hermosa Beach At your request, Lee-Kosmont Advisory Services (`Lee-Kosmont") has estimated the potential site- specific fiscal revenues that are likely to be generated for the City of Hermosa Beach by the existing improvements and by two alternative development scenarios for the property known as 19 2" d Street, Hermosa Beach ("Property"). Property is currently 'developed with two residential rental units. The parcel is approximately 4,144 square feet in area. It is in a block with two other parcels, one of which has frontage on Hermosa Avenue. One of those two other lots is also developed with two residential units. The lot with frontage on Hermosa Avenue is developed with a single -story restaurant. The total combined area of the three lots that constitute the block is approximately 9,880 square feet. The existing Cl zoning of the Property and the other two parcels permits a range of commercial uses or a mix of commercial and residential uses. The existing zoning does not permit new development that is exclusively residential. The owners of the Property are applying for a rezoning of the parcel to permit the demolition of the existing improvements and the development of two residential condominium units. The purpose of this analysis is to compare the potential annual fiscal revenues that would be generated for the City of Hermosa Beach by two specified alternative development scenarios. In addition, and as a point of reference, the current fiscal revenues being generated by the Property for the City are also estimated. SUMMARY FINDINGS Exhibit 1 presents the estimated annual fiscal revenues in four principal categories that are expected tobe generated by the Property in its present use as well as if redeveloped with the two proposed condominium units or as part of a hypothetical mixed-use development encompassing all three of the parcels on the block. The four principal sources of fiscal revenues, from the Property are utility user tax, property tax, sales tax and business license tax. The City is expected to receive the largest total fiscal revenues if the property is redeveloped with two condominium units. Redevelopment of the Property in a mixed-use in conjunction with the other two parcels on the block is expected to generate the second highest total fiscal revenues for 601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3550 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone 213.623.8484 Fax 213.623.8288 www.kosmont.com A Member of the Lee & Associates Group of.Companies /5 • l/fsmoni VISORY SERVICES •Comparative Fiscal Revenue Projection 19 2nd Street, Hermosa Beach April21, 2005 Rage 2of5 the City. The existing use of the Property is expected to produce the least total fiscal revenues for the City. Those estimated total annual fiscal revenues for the existing use and two alternative scenarios are as follows: Existing Use $1,900 Condominium $8,500 Mixed -Use $5,960 Consequently, the redevelopment of the Property as two residential condominiums is expected to produce substantially higher annual fiscal revenue for the City than either the existing use or if redeveloped as a part of a hypothetical three -parcel mixed-use project. It should be pointed out that prospect of the Property being redeveloped in a mixed-use in conjunction with the two other parcels on the block is highly speculative at best because it is impossible to estimate at what time in the future, if any, the three parcels might be combined under one ownership. Because of its configuration and size, it is infeasible for the subject parcel to be developed in a mixed-use or exclusively retail/commercial use on its own. CURRENT USE AND PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT The Property consists of a 1,137 square foot two -unit, wood -frame, single -story residential building. There is also a detached garage and two surface parking spaces. The lot is approximately 4,144 square feet in area. Property tax records state that the improvements were constructed in 1913. The units are currently occupied by tenants who lease the premises. The current assessed value is approximately $789,000. The owners propose to demolish the existing improvements and construct two residential condominium units on the Property. The development would incorporate on-site all the parking that is required by the Hermosa Beach zoning code. The owners' market analysis indicates that the units can be expected to sell for approximately $2,000,000 each upon completion. HYPOTHETICAL MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT As an alternative to leaving the Property as -is, or developing it with two condominium units, it would be permissible under the current zoning to develop the property with new exclusively commercial use (e.g., retail or restaurant) or mixed commercial and residential use. However, because of the small size and configuration of the Property, it would be infeasible from a practical standpoint to develop the Property on a "stand alone" basis in either an exclusively commercial or mixed-use. The parcel by itself contains too little land area to accommodate both reasonable sized improvements and the amount of associated parking that would be required. Therefore, for new commercial or mixed-use development to be accommodated, it would be necessary to combine the Property with the two other parcels that make up the block in order to be (6 '/fsmont VISORY SERVICES Comparative Fiscal Revenue Projection 19 2nd Street, Hermosa Beach April 21, 2005 Page 3 of 5 able to construct improvements that would large enough to be rational from an economic standpoint. Together, the three parcels that comprise the block are approximately 9,880 square feet in area. An analysis was conducted to determine how many square feet of 1) exclusively commercial, or 2) mixed-use development could be accommodated if the hypothetical three -parcel site were combined under single ownership, cleared for new development, and relevant provisions of the Hermosa Beach zoning code applied. In order to accommodate improvements and the required parking, it would be possible to develop a maximum of approximately 4,480 square feet of exclusively retail development or 2,400 square feet of exclusively restaurant development on the combined parcels. In a mixed-use mode, it would be possible to develop approximately 3,750 square feet of retail in conjunction with two apartment units or 2,080 square feet of restaurant in conjunction with two apartments. Additional apartments may theoretically be possible in a mixed-use mode but the size of the non-residential component would become marginal from an investment standpoint. Consequently, it would probably be optimal, from an, investment standpoint for the; three combined parcels to be developed with 3,750 square feet of retail in conjunction with two apartment units. This would include five parking spaces for the apartments and, 15 parking spaces for the retail space. As indicated, it would be necessary for the three parcels that make up this site to be combined under one owner to undertake this hypothetical mixed-use development. It would be extremely difficult to estimate when, if ever, that might occur. The ability of someone to acquire all three parcels will depend on a number of factors such as the values of the individual parcels as is or upgraded compared to the value each would contribute as land to a joint development of all three parcels in combination. Market conditions and the personal investment circumstances of the three owners will be the major determinants of how those values would compare. It would be futile to try to guess by when those factors would move to the point that it would become economically rational for individual parcels owners to sell for a joint development. ANNUAL FISCAL REVENUES The direct site-specific annual fiscal revenues to the City will come from four principal sources. The factors utilized in producing the estimates of those revenues came from a number of sources including the current owners and Lee-Kosmont's own reference materials. For purposes of allocating the fiscal revenues from the hypothetical mixed-use development among the three parcels, the revenues are distributed in accordance with percent of the total site that each individual parcel represents. As shown in Exhibit 2, the Property represents approximately 42% of the total site. UTILITY USER TAX The City levies a 6.00% tax on utility consumption at the "retail"•level, which is paid by the utility user. The tax is levied on all utilities, including electricity, natural gas, water, telephone, cable television, and cellular phone. kJosmont ADVISORY SERVICES Comparative Fiscal Revenue Projection 19 2nd Stree4 Hermosa Beach Apri121, 2005 Page 4 of 5 Estimates for the utility expenditures subject to utility tax were based on utility expenditure patterns in comparable properties. The derivation of the total utility taxes received by the City are presented in Exhibit 2 for the existing use and condominiums and in Exhibit 3 for the hypothetical mixed-use development. The City is estimated to annually receive approximately $340 from the existing use and $460 from the proposed condominium development. The Property's 42% allocation from the hypothetical mixed-use development would be approximately $570. PROPERTY TAX The total base property tax is 1.0% of market value, in accordance with Article XIII of the State Constitution. Allocations of the base property tax between taxing entities varies by tax rate area (TRA). For the TRA in which the Property is located, the City will receive approximately 20.0% of the base tax. A property is assessed at a market value that is determined when sale, change of ownership, or new construction occurs on the parcel. On an annual basis, a property's assessed value cannot increase by more than 2.0%. Development of the Property as condominiums or the hypothetical mixed-use will result in an increase in the property value site and a corresponding increase in the property tax revenue generated for the City general funds. The current assessed value for the Property is approximately $789,000. This generates $1,580 in annual property tax revenue for the City. This calculation is shown in Exhibit 3. The assessed value for the condominium development is based on the owners' the anticipated sale price of $2,000,000 per unit. The total estimated combined value would be $4,000,000. This will generate approximately $8,000 in annual property tax revenue for the City as shown in Exhibit 3. Based on discussions with individuals familiar with the retail real estate market in Hermosa Beach, retail space could be valued in the range of $290 per square foot or a total of $1,087,000. Based on potential rents, the apartments may be valued in the range of $648,000. This would produce a combined value for the mixed-use development of approximately $1,735,000. As shown in Exhibit 4, this value will generate a total of approximately $3,480 in annual property tax revenue for the City from all three parcels. SALES TAX The State collects an 8.25% sales tax on all qualifying sales in Los Angeles County. One percent (1.0%) of taxable sales is subsequently subvened by the State to the local jurisdiction (in this case the City of Hermosa Beach) in which the sale took place (i.e., to the point-of-sale). Taxable sales would only be produced by the hypothetical mixed-use development. Taxable sales are estimated to be in the range of $225 per square foot based on the location and the type of retail users that are likely to occupy the space. This will generate approximately $844,000 in annual taxable sales. As presented in Exhibit 4, the City's sales tax revenue from this scenario is estimated to be l$ J osmont ADVISORY SERVICES • Comparative Fiscal Revenue Projection 19 2nd Street, Hermosa Beach April21, 2005 Page 5 of 5 $8,440 annually from the entire mixed-use development. The 42% allocation to the Property would be approximately $3,540 per year. BUSINESS LICENSE TAX The City levies business license taxes on retail gross receipts. A flat tax of $100 is levied on the first $20,000 of gross receipts. Any excess above $20,000 is taxed at a rate of 0.10%. There is nobusiness license tax on commercial rental receipts. Consequently, only the hypothetical mixed-use development would generate any business license tax for the City. To calculate the City's annual business license tax revenue from the hypothetical mixed-use development, the business license tax rate was applied to the estimated annual gross receipts from retail sales. Annual retail sales were estimated to be in the range of $225 per square foot based on the type of retail user that the site should be able to attract. Total retail sales were estimated to bc. approximately $844,000. This amount would generate approximately. $920 in total business license tax revenue for the City from all three parcels. The 42% allocation to the Property is $390 per year. This calculation is shown in Exhibit 4. IT • S EXHIBIT 1 WELLS --HERMOSA BEACH COMPARATIVE ANNUAL FISCAL REVENUE ,SUMMARY COMPARISON Existing Condo Mixed Use Utility User Tax $340 $460 $570 Property Tax 1,580 8,000 1,460 Sales Tax 0 0 3,540 Business License Tax 0 0 390 Total Fiscal Revenue $1,920 $8,460 $5,960 Wells Hermosa Bch Fiscal Rev 02A PDF2-0 4/21/2005 3:01 PM EXHIBIT 2 WELLS - HERMOSA BEACH COMPARATIVE ANNUAL FISCAL REVENUE MIXED USE SCENARIO Three Combined Parcels Square Feet 9,880 Improvements Retail Square Feet 3,750 Apartment Units 2 Required Parking Spaces Apartments 5 Retail 15 Total 20 19 2nd Street Allocation Square Feet of Land Percent of Combined Parcels 4,144 42% Wells Hermosa 'Bch Fiscal Rev 02A PDF 4/212005 3:02 PM • • EXHIBIT 3 ELLS - HERMOSA BEACH COMPARATIVE ANNUAL FISCAL REVENUE ESTIMATED FISCAL REVENUES IN RESIDENTIAL USES Number of Units Existing Proposed Rental Condo 2 2 Utility User Tax Usage Per Unit Per Month $235 $320 Annual 2,820 3,840 Total Usage 5,640 7,680 Tax Rate 6.00% 6.00% Amount $340 $460 Property Tax Assessed Value Per Unit n.a. $2,000,000 Total $789,400 $4,000,000 Tax Rate 1.00% 1.00% City Share of Tax Percent of Total 20% 20% Amount $1,580 $8,000 Combined Total $1,920 $8,460 Wells Hermosa Bch Fiscal Rev 02A PDF 2Z 4/21/2005 3:02 PM EXHIBIT 4 WELLS - HERMOSA BEACH COMPARATIVE ANNUAL FISCAL REVENUE ESTIMATED FISCAL REVENUES FOR MIXED USE Apartment Retail Combined Ubits Number 2 1 Square Feet Per Unit 1,200 Total 2,400 3,750 Utility User Tax Usage Per Unit or Sq Ft Per Month $245 Annual 2,940 $4.50 Total Usage 5,880 16,880 Tax Rate 6.00% 6.00% Annual Amount $350 $1,010 $1,360 Property Tax Assessed Value Per Unit or Sq Ft $324,000 $290 Total 648,000 1,087,500 $1,735,500 Tax Rate 1.00% 1.00% City Share Percent of Total 20% 20% Annual Amount $1,300 $2,180 $3,480 Sales Tax Annual Sales Per Sq Ft $225 Total 843,750 Tax Rate 1.00% Annual Amount $8,440 Business License Tax Total Sales $843,750 Taxed at Flat Rate. 20,000 Taxed at Percent $823,750 Tax Rate 0.10% Annual Amount Flat Amount $100 Percent Tax 820 $8A40 Total $920 $920 Combined Total Combined Parcels $1,650 12,550 $14,200 19 2nd Street Allocation Percent of Combined Parcels 42% Amount $5,960 Wells Hermosa Bch Fiscal Rev 02A PDF z3 4/21/2005 3:02 PM STEVE KAPLAN ATTORNEY AT LAW June 23, 2005 City Council City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attention: Ken Robertson Senior Planner, Community Development Department Re: Property located at 19 2nd Street Members of the City Council: MECEiliNg JUN 2 3 2095 COM. DEV. DEP T The undersigned represents Gary and Cindi Wells, the owners of the above referenced property and the appellants with respect to the General Plan Amendment, and Zone Change applications denied by the Planning Commission on the evening of May 17th. The purpose of this letter is to detail our reasons for seeking the support of the City Council in (1) approving the change of the General Plan designation of my client's property from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential and the corresponding zoning designation from C-1 to R-3; and (2) confirming the Planning Commission's support of the Precise Plan, CUP and subdivision map applications filed to effect the development of a 2 -unit condominium project. Please find outlined below our positions in support of the filed applications: 1. The Planning Commission denied my client's request for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change finding that the existing General Plan and Zoning designations were the appropriate depth for commercial or mixed-use developments for the subject location. In the instant filing, the applicants ask that. this City Council reconsider said finding for the reasons discussed below. The General Plan designation of Neighborhood Commercial is described at page 26 of the Land Use Element as follows: "This category includes convenience stores, Laundromats and similar uses designed to primarily serve local walk-in traffic (bolded emphasis added)." The purpose of the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial Zone, as described in Section 17.26.020(B) of the Zoning Ordinance is "to provide sites for a mix of small local businesses appropriate for, and serving the daily needs of nearby residential neighborhoods (bolded emphasis added)..." SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1219 MORNINGSIDE DRIVE SUITE 212 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 PHONE (310) 802.1230 FAX (310) 802.0060 E-MAIL SIKREATTY@AOL.COM a -Lf - 5 Hermosa Beach City Council June 23, 2005 Page 2 The reclassification of my client's property to the requested designations will not prejudice the goals of the above stated city policies. The 60 -foot cumulative depth from Hermosa Avenue of the two properties to the east of my client's lot is sufficient in order to provide for the types of uses encouraged by the above quoted city guidelines. The walk-up trade contemplated by the neighborhood commercial designation does not demand extensive parking allocation. The realistic use of my client's property in any commercial or mixed-use development would be for parking... parking that is not required for a true walk-up neighborhood clientele. In addition, the classification of the subject property as commercial cannot be justified because 1) the property does not front on Hermosa Avenue; 2) the opportunities for commercial use are limited, or non-existent, due to the small size of the lot and its isolation from other commercial uses and/or lots; and 3) the properties directly north, east and west of the subject lot are classified as residential. Although as noted in the Planning Department staff report, the approval of these applications will preclude future expansion of the Hermosa Avenue commercial frontage through to the Beach Drive alley, such expansive development is improbable given that both the subject lot and 25 2nd Street must be combined with the Hermosa Avenue fronting commercial lot. It is the opinion of the undersigned that the truest barometer of the best use for property is the marketplace. My clients have been unable to sell their property as a commercial site for over two years. No development proposals or offers have been received by the 3 separate owners of -the lots bounded by Hermosa Avenue and Second Street seeking to consolidate said properties into one integrated commercial project. If a demand_ existed for an integrated commercial use of said properties, such proposals or offers would have already transformed the site. Accordingly, I believe the request to change the General Plan and Zoning designations of my client's property is both reasonable and justified. 2. Although the goal of promoting larger, integrated neighborhood commercial developments along secondary. arterial streets is understandable, including the potential of creating and increasing annual fiscal revenues for the city, the policy has not achieved its desired end result in the instant case. Included in the materials submitted to the planning staff is a Comparative Fiscal Revenue Projection from the firm of Lee Kosmont Advisory Services. The conclusion of this report indicates that the city will receive more annual fiscal revenue from my client's proposed two- Hermosa Beach City Council June 23, 2005 Page 3 unit condominium project than it presently receives from the existing site uses or from a hypothetical mixed-use development of the site. For all of the reasons discussed above, request is hereby made to the City Council to approve all of the entitlement applications filed concerning the property located at 19 2nd Street. Thank you for your consideration of this material and I look forward to appearing before you next Tuesday evening. Sincerely, St aplan cc: Gary and Cindi Wells Srour & Associates 2� Honorabl4Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council July 6, 2005 Regular Meeting of July 12, 2005 CITYWIDE SPEED SURVEY AND POSTED SPEED LIMITS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the Citywide Speed Survey prepared by ME, Inc.; and 2. Waive Full Reading and Introduce the Ordinance establishing citywide posted speed limits. Summary: Based on the Engineering and Traffic Surveys conducted in the manner prescribed in the State of. California Vehicle Code, it is the recommendation of the staff that the Ordinance (ATTACHMENT 1)be adopted setting the speed limits for all Arterial and Collector roadways. Background: The State of California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that an Engineering and Traffic Survey be conducted every five years, with the survey's results being used to establish or adjust the posted speed limits on streets where radar would be used as an enforcement tool. The surveys, conducted in conjunction with these report recommendations, were conducted in conformance with the CVC requirements. Other policies, procedures and requirements associated with establishing or adjusting a speed limit include: • It is a long-standing premise of engineering, enforcement and judicial officials that 85% of all motorists will travel a street segment at a speed that they feel is safe and prudent for the prevailing conditions, and that the posting of a speed limit significantly lower than the 85th percentile speed will have very little effect on the continuing actual speed of traffic on the street. Taking this into account, recommended speed limits are normally set at or near the 85th percentile speed as determined utilizing the Engineering and Traffic Survey. The CVC and Municipal Courts recognize that there may be extenuating circumstances or changes in the roadway or traffic characteristics that are not readily apparent to the motorists and may justify a reduction of the speed limitbelow the 85th percentile level. These conditions and circumstances include a high incidence of speed -related accidents, street alignment, narrowing of the. roadway, obscured access from cross streets or driveways onto the major roadway, or new or unanticipated pedestrian or bicycle activity. A reduced speed limit based on these conditions is documented in the data submitted to the courts. Analysis:' The traffic engineering staff conducted traffic counts and segment speed surveys of Arterial and Collector roadways citywide. Staff performed the required fieldwork to collect the vehicular traffic volumes and performed the speed zone surveys. The results of the Engineering and Traffic Surveys 6a unchanged, and Table 2.(ATTACHMENT 2) showing the streets where the speed limits are recommended to be changed. Based upon the 85th percentile traffic data collected, it is determined that Prospect Avenue, Valley Drive and Ardmore Avenue need to have posted speed limits of 30 mph, an increase from the existing 25 mph speed limit. However, it is our engineering judgment that extenuating circumstances exist on Prospect Avenue and Ardmore Avenue between 2nd and 8th Streets and should remain posted at 25 mph. The methodology allows for the justified speed limits based on the 85th percentile surveyed to be reduced by an additional 5 mph when the following factors are met: o Multiple unprotected crossings o Residential/School zone o Horizontal Curves o Vertical Curves o Restricted Sight Distance o Pedestrian Walking Corridor o Multiple Stop -Controlled Crossing Streets o Multiple Residential Driveways All of these apply to Prospect Avenue and Ardmore Avenue, between 2nd and 8th Streets, is very narrow with horizontal curves and poor sight distance at side streets, therefore an additional 5 mph reduction is recommended leaving the speed limits currently posted unchanged. Not enough of these factors apply to Valley Drive or Ardmore Avenue from 8th to Pier Avenue to make a similar finding. The segment of Valley Drive, between 21st" and Pier Avenue, which is earmarked for an increase in posted speed limit, has a school that may be affected by the changing of the speed limit from 25 mph to 30 mph. It is state law that all motorists, upon observing school children, must drive at the speed of 25 mph or less; however, we are recommending that additional traffic control signs reinforcing the message be installed within the segment. The sign is a state standard sign with the text "SCHOOL, SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT". The survey also recommends reducing the speed limit on Ardmore from Gould Avenue to 21st Street from 35 mph to 30 mph. The Public Works Commission heard this item on September 15, 2004. They supported the proposed posted speed limits with the exception of the portion recommending an increase in speed for the segment of Valley Drive between Pier Ave. and 8th Street. The Commission recommended that this segment not have an increased speed limit due to foot traffic and congestion (see Commission minutes - ATTACHMENT 4). The City's Traffic Engineering consultant could not agree with their finding. Option: Council may choose to not change the speed limits as recommended by the speed survey. The impact of not using the survey results for setting speed limits is reduced enforcement capability when citations are challenged in court. The use of radar enforcement requires that a speed survey be completed within the last five years and signage be in compliance with the survey. Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost for installing the proposed changes to the speed limits would be in the range of $250-$300 per sign. There are sufficient funds in the Street Maintenance budget to purchase the necessary signs. . Attachments: 1. Citywide Speed Zone Survey - Table 1 2. Citywide Speed Zone Survey - Table 2 3. Draft Resolution 4. Public Works Commission minutes Respectfully submitted, Richard D. organ, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Michael La Chief of Po Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: Step - • !: urrell City anager L-A-\Russell Tingley Fire Chief H:1B951PWFILESICCITEMSIspeed survey accept 6-28-05.doc Table 1 Street No. Location Dir. Date 10 mph Pace % in 10 mph Pace 50th percent'l (mph) 85th percent'l (mph) Posted Speed Limit (mph) Recom'd Speed Limit (mph) Ardmore No. City Limit to Ave. 1 Gould Ave. N/S 7/18/03 28-37 75.0 32.8 36.5 35 35 5 2nd St. to 8th St. N/S 7/18/03 20-29 79.0 26.3 29.8 25 25 Artesia Blvd. 6 Pacific Coast E/W 7/18/03 27-36 71.7 30.8 36.1 40 40 Hwy. To East City Limit Aviation 7 Pacific Coast E/W 7/21/03 29-38 88.0 35.2 37.1 35 35 Blvd. Hwy. To East City Limit • Gould Ave. 8 Ardmore Ave. to E/W 7/18/03 21-30 92.0 25.7 28.4 25 25 Manhattan Ave. Hermosa 9 27th St. to 22nd St. E/W 7/18/03 27-36 85:0 30.3 33.7 30 30 Ave. 10 22nd St. to 16th St. E/W 7/21/03 24-33 80.0 28.6 33.5 30 30 11 8th St. to Herondo E/W 7/21/03 24-33 81.0 28.6 31.7 30 30 St. Herondo St. 12 Valley Dr. to E/W 7/21/03 27-36 80.0 32.5 36.3 35 35 Hermosa Ave. Longfellow 13 Valley Dr. to E/W 7/21/03: 18-27 86.0 23.2 25.9 25 25 Ave. Hermosa Ave. . Manhattan 14 No. City Limit to N/S 7/21/03 21-30 79.0 26.0 29.7 30 30 Ave. Longfellow Ave. 15 Longfellow Ave. to 27th St. N/S 7/21/03 21-30 83.0 24.8 29.5 30 30 16 Pier Ave. to 15t N/S 7/21/03 17-26 85.0 22.3 25.5 25 25 St. Monterey 17 19th St. to Pier . N/S 7/21/03 20-29 87.0 24.6 28.3 25 25 Ave. Ave. 18 Pier Ave. to N/S. 7/21/03 22-31 77.0 26.5 30.5 25 25 Herondo St. Pacific Coast Hwy. 19 Artth esia Blvd. to 15th St, N/S 7/21/03 33-42 90.8 37.6 41.2 35 35 20 15 St. to South City Limit N/S 7/21/03 26-35 92.0 30.2 34.0 30 30 ATTACHMENTI Table 1 (cont'd). Street No. Location Dir. Date 10 mph Pace % in 10 mph Pace 50th percent'I (mph) 85th percent'I (mph) Posted Speed Limit (mph) Recom'd Speed Limit (mph) Pier Ave. 21 Pacific Coast E/W 7/22/03 17-26 92.0 19.9 24.4 25 25 Hwy. to Ardmore Ave. 22 Ardmore Ave. to E/W 7/22/03 19-28 91.0 23.0 26.3 25 25 Monterey Blvd. 23 Monterey Blvd. to E/W 7/22/03 18-27 ..' 97.0 22.6 24.5 25 25 Hermosa Ave. Prospect 24 Artesia Blvd. to N/S 7/22/03 18-27 96.0 23.2 25.4 25 25 Ave. 21st St. 25 215t St. to N/S 7/22/03 26-35 88.0 29.5 33.6 25 25 Aviation Blvd. 26 Aviation Blvd. to N/S 7/22/03 23-32 91.0 27.1 30.3 25 25 6th ST. 27 6th St. to South N/S. 7/22/03 22-31 95.0 25.3 28.5 25 25 City Limit 28 North City Limit to N/S 7/23/03 23-32 82.0 26.3 31.0 30 30 Valley Dr. Gould Ave. 33 Pacific Coast. E/W 7/23/03 17-26 89.0 21.8 25.0 25 25 Second St. Hwy. to Valley Dr 34 Valley Dr. to E/W 7/23/03 20-29 90.0 23.8 27.0 25 25 Hermosa Ave. Eighth St. 35 East City Limit to E/W 7/25/03 16-25 84.0 20.0 23.9 25 25 Pacific Coast Hwy. 36 Pacific Coast E/W 7/23/03 17-26 90.0 21.6 24.9 25 25 Hwy. to Ardmore Ave. 37 Pacific Coast E/W 7/23/03 16-25 84.0 19.9 25.2 25 25 Thirtieth St. Hwy. to Ardmore Ave. Table 2 Street No. Location. Dir. .Date 10 mph Pace % in 10 mph Pace 50th percent'l (mph) 85th percent'l (mph) Posted Speed Limit (mph) Recom'd Speed Limit (mph) Ardmore Ave. Gould Ave. to N/S 7/18/03 23-32 82.0 29.2 31.9 35 30 2 21St St.' Pier Ave. to 8`h N/S 7/.18/03 20-29 67.0 26.9 32.0 25 30 4 St. Valley Dr. 29 Gould Ave. to N/S 7/23/03 20-29 81.0 25.5 29.6 25 30 21St St. 30 21St St. to Pier N/S 7/23/03 24-33 90.0 26.6 29.8 25 30 Ave. 31 Pier Ave. to 8`h N/S 7/23/03 22-31 88.0 25.4 ' 29.7 25 30 St. 32 8th St. to 2nd St. N/S 7/23/03 25-34 85.0 29.8 33.5 . 25 . 30 ATTACHMENT 2 ORDINANCE NO. 05 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ESTABLISHING CITY WIDE POSTED SPEED LIMITS WHEREAS, as the City of Hermosa Beach uses radar in the enforcement of its posted speed limits; WHEREAS, as the State of California Vehicle Code states, in essence," that posted speed limits established under local authority, and conforming to the applicable sections and subsections of the State of Califomia Vehicle Code may not be enforced through the use of radar or other electronic devices unless the posted speed limit has been reevaluated and justified by an engineering and traffic survey within the last five years; WHEREAS, as the traffic and engineering survey as defined by the State of Califomia Vehicle Code must consider the prevailing speeds on the roadway as determined by traffic engineering measurements, accident history and highway, traffic and roadside conditions pursuant to establishing a posted speed limit; WHEREAS, staff conducted traffic counts and segment speed surveys citywide. Staff performed the required fieldwork to collect the biannual vehicular traffic volumes at 37 locations; and WHEREAS, the City Traffic Engineer reviewed the roadway conditions and the studies conducted and recommends speed limit posting as listed below. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Section tir of the HERMOSA BEACH Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: STREET RECOMMFNDFD SPFED J IMIT (MPH} Ardmore Ave: No. City Limit to Gould Ave. 35 Gould Ave. to 21st St. 30 21st St. to Pier Ave. 30 Pier Ave. to 8th St. 30 8th St. to 2nd St. 25 ATTACHMENT 3 STREET LIMITS Artesia Blvd. Pacific Coast Hwy. To East City Limit Aviation Blvd. Pacific Coast Hwy. To East City Limit Gould Ave. Ardmore Ave. to Manhattan Ave. Hermosa Ave. 27th St. to 22nd St. 22nd St. to 16th. St. 8th St. to Herondo St. Herondo St. Valley Dr. to Hermosa Ave. Longfellow Ave. Valley Dr. to Hermosa Ave. Manhattan Ave. No. City Limit to Longfellow Ave. Longfellow Ave. to 27th St. Pier Ave. to 1st St. Monterey Ave. 19th St.. to Pier Ave. Pier Ave. to Herondo St. Artesia Blvd. to 15th St. Pacific Coast Hwy. 15th St. to South City Limit Pier Ave. Pacific Coast Hwy. to Ardmore Ave. Ardmore Ave. to Monterey Blvd: Monterey Blvd. to Hermosa Ave. Prospect Ave. Artesia Blvd. to 21st St: 21st St. to Aviation Blvd. Aviation Blvd. to 6th ST. 6th St. to South City Limit 2 40, 35 25 30 30 30 35 25 30 30 25 25 25 35 30 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Valley Dr. North City Limit to Gould Ave. Gould Ave. to 21st St. 21St St. to Pier Ave. Pier Ave. to 8th St. 8th St. to 2nd St. Second St. Pacific Coast Hwy. to Valley Dr Valley Dr. to Hermosa Ave. Eighth St. East City Limit to Pacific Coast Hwy. Pacific Coast Hwy. to Ardmore Ave. Thirtieth St. Pacific Coast Hwy. to Ardmore Ave. 30 30 30 30 30 25 25 25 25 25 Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the invalidity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that .any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall . cause this ordinance or a summary thereof to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach at their regular meeting held on , 2005. ATTEST: ELAINE DOERFLING, CITY CLERK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 J.R. REVICZKY, MAYOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) I, ELAINE DOERFLING, City Clerk HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance Council of the City of Hermosa Beach held on AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, DO was adopted at a regular meeting of the City of , 2005. ELAINE DOERFLING, CITY CLERK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH H:\B95\PWFILES\Ords\speed zone survey accept 6-28-05.doc 4 Further discussion by the Commission included: • The intent of the restrictions is to discourage beach parking. • It would not take parking away from residents. • Looking at restrictions as a way to alleviate, not create, problems. • The restrictions should not pose a problem on weekdays or for those residents who come home early. ■ May need more than six spaces to create a turnover that would alleviate parking: MOTION by Commissioner Beste to implement a 4 -hour restriction on Valley Drive between Gould Ave. and the Kiwanis Club and the six newly created parking spaces on weekends only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Seconded by Commissioner Cheatham. AYES: Cheatham, Lombardo, Beste NAYS: None ABSENT: Applebaum, Winnek ABSTAIN: None c. Citywide Speed Zone Survey Mr. Morgan informed everyone that the City is required to perform this survey every 5 years and maintain speed limit signs in conformance with the survey. Speed surveys have been completed and analyzed to determine the 85th percentile speeds. Accident history and other traffic factors are considered for revisions, if warranted. The Speed Zone. Survey will be forwarded to City Council and will require two (2) meetings for formal adoption. Mr. Abassi presented the results of the survey. . Highlights of Mr. Abassi's presentation included: • People are traveling at higher rates of speeds. • Speed at or below speed limit • Areas that have recommended revisions: o Ardmore Avenue: Gould Ave to 21st Street, decrease speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph, Pier Avenue to 8th St. and 8th Street to 2nd Street increase speed limit from 25 mph to 30 mph; o Valley Drive, Gould Avenue to 21St Street, 21st Street to Pier Avenue, Pier Avenue to 8th Street, 8th Street to 2nd Street increase speed limits from 25 mph to30mph. • Mr. Morgan explained that Caltrans mandates that the survey be taken in order to enforce speeding tickets issued when using radar. • Streets not listed are governed by primafacie speed limit— travel at safe speeds of 25 mph or less; collector and arterial streets are included. Commissioner Lombardo cited instructions for public commentand opened the floor for comments. Alan Carter, 252 27th Court • Concerned that he did not see PCH down Gould included on survey. PCH West on Gould to Ardmore, traveling down the hill at 25 mph is very dangerous. Everyone travels faster. • Would like to see a survey done in this area. ■ ! Would like to see the speed limit raised from 25 mph to 35 mph. PWC Minutes ATTACHMENT 4 09/15/04 • Does not want to see recommended decrease onSould Ave to 21st Street from 35 mph to 30 mph. • Stated his feelings that Commission is not considerate of the people's time. Mr. Abassi addressed Mr. Carter's concern about the 25 mph on Gould. This segment of Gould, from PCH to Ardmore was re-classified as a residential street by City Council so it is not included in the survey. Discussion among the Commission included: • Concerned about 25 mph on Valley. Did City Council reduce without survey? Mrs. Punneo explained that Commission been involved with the change to 25 mph between 11th and 2nd Streets to Pier when the speed was reduced from 30 mph. This took place in the Commission's first year of existence. • Mr. Abassi explained that if recommendation is changed, that segment is no longer enforceable by radar. • Survey must go to Council and would carry recommendations of Commission along with it, but survey will be presented in its entirety to Council. • Council can deviate from recommendations or survey results. • Concern over Pier to 8th on Valley increased speed limit. Robert Cummings, 232 26th Street • Stated that due to pedestrian traffic on Valley Drive near the Farmers Market, it is not responsible to raise speed limit. Mr. Abassi noted that the report would go to Council in its entirety and could include a memo from the Commission stating their concerns and/or recommendations. MOTION by Commissioner Lombardo to support the engineering andtraffic survey with the exception of theportion recommending an increase in speed for the segment of Valley Drive between Pier Ave.. and 8th Street. Recommends that this area not have an increased speed limit due to foot traffic and congestion. Seconded by Commissioner Beste. AYES: Cheatham, Lombardo, Beste NAYS: None ABSENT: Applebaum, Winnek ABSTAIN: None Commissioner Lombardo informed Public that if they are not in agreement with Commission's decision could appeal: 7. Commissioners' Reports None. 8. Public Works Department Reports a. Monthly Activity Report — July b. Project Status Reports — July The above items are presented for information purposes only. At this time, Mr. Morgan advised that he'd spoken with Mr. Tim Podzervinski of Prospect Avenue and informed him that after extensive review of the license survey and left turn lane cycle length, PWC Minutes 9 09/15/04 July 7, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of • July 12, 2005 ALTERNATIVE ORDINANCE FOR THE CONSIDERATION BY THE VOTERS FOR CONTROLLING IMPROVEMENTS ON THE GREENBELT AND ON THE BEACH Continued from the meeting of 6/28/05 Recommendation: That the City Council consider the following options regarding the subject alternative ordinance and initiative ordinance. 1. Take no action on the initiative, set for the November ballot; 2. Place a competing measure on the ballot; or, 3. Decide to oppose the initiative. Background: At itsmeeting of June 28,.2005, the City Council reviewed the staff report regarding the alternative ordinance to the Ordinance Prohibiting Construction of New Public Improvements on the Beach and on the Greenbelt. Following a discussion of the alternative ordinance and comments from the proponents of the initiative ordinance regarding the intent of the authors, a sub -committee of Mayor Reviczky, and Councilmember Keegan was formed to meet with the proponents to determine whether or not the several concerns regarding existing improvements and activities could be addressed. The sub -committee, proponents, City Attorney and City Manager met and discussed the concerns. A representative of the proponents and the City Manager met later to work on language that the proponents may consider using to express their intent regarding the meaning and scope of the initiative measure in their ballot argument. This information will be forwarded to each of you when it is received and I expect this to be provided to me on Monday, July 11, 2005. Depending on the information that the proponents provide, the City Council may conclude that it is satisfied with the proponent's statement of intent to be included in a ballot argument, which would have some evidentiary value if the measure were to be subject to interpretation in a lawsuit. If this becomes the case then the City Council would not have to take any action. Staff has, as a result of the meeting with the sub -committee and proponents, revised the alternative ordinance. A copy of the revised ordinance and the first draft is attached. This, of course, can still be modified by the City Council prior to it being placed on the ballot should that be the direction that you decide to take. If it is to be placed on the ballot, staff will return at the July 26, 2005 meeting with a resolution placing it on the ballot. As a third option, the City Council may determine that initiative measure is overly restrictive and ambiguous, and determine to oppose it. Rest' ctfully submi St`tphe : urrell City Manager d, 6b • • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONTROLLING IMPROVEMENTS ON THE GREENBELT AND ON THE BEACH The People of the City of Hermosa Beach do ordain as follows: Section 1. Sections 17.32.030 and 17.32.040 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code are amended to read as follows: 17.32.030 Permitted improvements. Improvements permitted in the 0-S-1 zone shall be limited to the following: A. Greenbelt. Landscaping; erosion control devices; irrigation facilities; anti - seawater intrusion facilities and wells; subsurface pipes, conduits and other utility infrastructure; and replacement or repair of parking facilities existing on November 1, 2005 within their existing footprint. B. Beach. Maintenance, repair and replacement of existing improvements and facilities; temporary facilities erected for permitted special events; improvements required for health, safety and sanitation; and subsurface pipes, conduits and utility infrastructure. 17.32.040 Areas designated. The following areas shall be designated and zoned 0-S-1: A. Greenbelt. Bounded on the north and south by the city limits, on the east by the curb face on Ardmore Avenue and on the west by the curb face on Valley Drive (the "Greenbelt"). B. Beach. Bounded on the north and south by the city limits, on the east by the existing wall on the Strand and on the west by the ocean (the "Beach"). Section 2. The provisions of this Ordinance shall not be modified, amended or repealed except by a vote of the People. June 21, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of June 28, 2005 ALTERNATIVE ORDINANCE FOR THE CONSIDERATION BY THE VOTERS FOR CONTROLLING IMPROVEMENTS ON THE GREENBELT AND ON THE BEACH Recommendation: That the City Council review the ordinance to be placed on the ballot as an alternative to the initiative ordinance which will also be on the November 2005 ballot. Background: The City Council at the 11/23/04 meeting directed that the initiative measure entitled Ordinance Prohibiting Construction of New Public Improvements on the Beach and on the Greenbelt be placed on the November 2005 municipal ballot. Staff was directed at the May 24, 2005 meeting to return with an alternative ordinance for the City Council to also consider placing on the ballot. As you will recall, staff in its report of the initiative ordinance pointed out a number of concerns and that these changes have far greater implications than merely preventing construction of more parking areas on the Greenbelt and a bike•path on the beach. In order to provide for the reasonable use, safety, maintenance and eventual replacement on existing public improvements on the beach, staff has developed alternative language that will permit the ongoing use of these improvements without taking away the main intent of the drafters of the initiative's purpose of prohibiting any additional parking lots on the Greenbelt and the construction of a bike path on the beach without a vote of the people. Staff is suggesting the following language: . PERMITTED IMPROVEMENTS Improvements permitted in the 0-S-1 zone shall be limited to the following: A. Greenbelt. Landscaping; erosion control devices; irrigation facilities; anti - seawater intrusion facilities and wells; subsurface pipes, conduits and other utility infrastructure; and replacement or repair of parking facilities existing on November 1, 2005 within their existing footprint. B. Beach. Volleyball courts and playground equipment; lifeguard buildings and towers; public restrooms; temporary facilities erected for permitted special events; beach maintenance storage facilities; pier improvements; beach and shore protection improvements and devices; pollution protection devices that implement the City's pollution elimination permit; subsurface pipes, conduits and other utility infrastructure; and beach refuse collection facilities. 6d • •', The above language will allow the continued maintenance and reasonable upgrades and replacements of improvements located in the Greenbelt and on the beach while staying within the spirit of the initiative. A copy of the alternative ordinance is attached for your review. If approved, the City Clerk will return with a resolution to include this ordinance on the November 2005 ballot Respectfully submitted, Stephen Burrell City Manager • •, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONTROLLING IMPROVEMENTS ON THE GREENBELT AND ON THE BEACH The People of the City of Hermosa Beach do ordain as follows: Section 1. Sections 17.32.030 and 17.32.040 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code are amended to read as follows: 17.32.030 Permitted improvements. Improvements permitted in the O -S-1 zone shall be limited to the following: A. Greenbelt. Landscaping; erosion control devices; irrigation facilities; anti - seawater intrusion facilities and wells; subsurface pipes, conduits and other utility infrastructure; and replacement or repair of parking facilities existing on November 1, 2005 within their existing footprint. B. Beach. Volleyball courts and playground equipment; lifeguard buildings and towers; public restrooms; temporary facilities erected for permitted special events; beach maintenance storage facilities; pier improvements; beach and shore protection improvements and devices; pollution protection devices that implement the City's pollution elimination permit; subsurface pipes, conduits and other utility infrastructure; and beach refuse collection facilities. 17.32.040 Areas designated. The following areas shall be designated and zoned O -S-1: A. Greenbelt. Bounded on the north and south by the city limits, on the east by the curb face on Ardmore Avenue and on the west by the curb face on Valley Drive (the "Greenbelt"). B. Beach. Bounded on the north and south by the city limits, on the east by the existing wall on the Strand and on the west by the ocean (the "Beach"). Section 2. The provisions of this Ordinance shall not be modified, amended or repealed except by a vote of the People. JENKINS & HOGIN , LLP A LAW PARTNERSHIP MEMORANDUM TO: MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CC: STEVE BURRELL FROM: MICHAEL JENKINS DATE: NOVEMBER 23, 2004 RE: BEACH AND GREENBELT OPEN ZONE INITIATIVE This memorandum is submitted at your direction pursuant to Election Code Section 9212 in order to report on the implications of the above -referenced initiative measure. As reported to you by the City Clerk at your November 9, 2004 regular meeting, the initiative has qualified for placement on the ballot at the general municipal election in November, 2005. Upon receipt of this report, you have the option of adopting the initiative measure without alteration or placing it on the ballot in November 2005. The initiative measure states that its intent is to prevent the construction of new parking areas on the Greenbelt and a bike path on the beach, and to treat the two areas uniformly as open space. The initiative does two things: 1. It amends one provision in the chapter of the zoning ordinance governing the O -S-1 zone to limit the replacement or repair of existing improvements in that zone to "their footprint existing on the date of adoption of this ordinance;" and 2. It places the beach into the 0-S-1 zone, which currently only applies to the Greenbelt. As discussed in greater detail below, these changes have far greater implications than merely preventing construction of more parking areas on the Greenbelt and a bike path on the beach. JENKINS & HOGIN LLP Members of the City Council November 23, 2004 Page 2 Current law The 0-S-1 zone is established in Chapter 17.32 of the Municipal Code. Currently, the only property in the City designated 0-S-1 is the Greenbelt. While Section 17.32.020 purports to allow in the 0-S-1 zone all uses as are permitted in the O -S zone,l it goes on to say that "no structure, building or improvement shall be developed, constructed or erected unless specifically authorized as a permitted improvement herein." Section 17.32.030, entitled "Permitted Improvements," narrowly restricts improvements in the 0-S-1 zone to the following: 1. Only non -building improvements are allowed, solely for landscaping, beautification, erosion control, irrigation or anti -seawater intrusion, in order to maintain the open space. (§17.32:o3o.A) 2. Improvements to two existing parking areas located within the Greenbelt across from City Hall and from Clark Stadium as necessary to maintain the existing parking spaces, as long as they do not expand the parking areas. (§17.32.030.B) Change in the law proposed by the initiative The change proposed by the initiative measure to Section 17.32.030.B2 would delete entirely the existing references to the two parking areas on the Greenbelt, and replace those references with a general restriction on replacement and repairs to existing improvements in the 0-S-1 zone, limiting such replacement and repairs to the,existing footprint of those improvements. The change proposed by the initiative measure to 17.32.040 would designate and zone the beach, in addition to the Greenbelt, as 0-S-1 zoned property. This would mean that: • No new buildings or structures may be constructed on the beach. The only new improvements that could be constructed on the beach would be those related to landscaping, beautification, erosion control, irrigation and anti - seawater intrusion. • Existing improvements could be repaired and replaced, but only within the confines of their existing footprints. ' Permitted uses in the OS zone are parks, educational buildings and playgrounds, recreation centers, public utility structures, trails, public governmental buildings, historic monuments, public malls and plazas, the ocean, transit uses and landscaping. 2 No change is proposed to Section 17.32.o3o.A. JENKINS & HOGIN LLP ' I Members of the City Council November 23, 2004 Page 3 The zoning ordinance defines the word "structure," but does not include a definition of the word "improvements." As broadly as the word "structure" is defined in Section 17.04.040 ("anything constructed or erected which requires location on the ground or attached to something having a location on the ground"), the term "improvement" is arguably broader, as it refers in Chapter 17.32 to such objects as landscaping and beautification (neither of which is necessarily a "structure"). It appears that the word "improvements" was used in Chapter 17.32 as a reference to the specific facilities and objects that exist on the Greenbelt; hence, it is difficult and problematical to apply the term to the broader array of facilities and objects that exist, or might be placed, on the beach. Responses to City Council's specific questions At your November 9, 2004 regular meeting, several Councilmembers raised questions as to the effect of treating the Greenbelt and the beach uniformly under a single set of regulations as is proposed by the initiative. In my view, the initiative would not have a significant effect on the existing regulations as they apply to the Greenbelt. However, adoption of the initiative has broader implications for the beach, some of which are clear and some of which cannot be ascertained with certainty. For example: 1) Existing buildings (i.e. bathrooms) and structures (i.e. drainage devices) on the beach may be repaired or replaced, but could not be relocated outside their existing footprint. 2) No new bathrooms or other structures could be constructed on the beach. 3) No new fiber optic cable of the kind laid by Tyco under the beach would be allowed. 4) New utility facilities would not be allowed unless necessary for irrigation, erosion control or anti -seawater intrusion. It is not clear whether a storm water facility would be considered a form of "erosion control." 5) New volleyball posts would not be allowed; existing posts could be repaired or replaced in their existing locations only. 6) Because they are not fixed in the sand, it is unclear whether lifeguard stands are "improvements" within the meaning of the initiative. Since lifeguard stands are located on the ground, they are arguably "structures" within the meaning of the zoning ordinance. If the term "improvements" is broader than the term "structure," it is arguable that lifeguard stands could not be moved, and new stands could not be positioned on the beach. 7) It is not clear whether the restriction on "improvements" is limited to those that are permanent in nature, or whether the initiative is intended to cover improvements and facilities connected with a temporary event, such as bleachers or a bandstand. The language in Section 17.32.020 broadly prohibitions the "erection" of any improvement or structure except as. expressly permitted in Section 17.32.030.A. Arguably, the "erection" of temporary structures is prohibited. JENKINS & HOGIN LLP Members of the City Council November 23, 2004 Page 4 • Because the stated intent of the drafters of the initiative is limited to preventing more parking areas on the Greenbelt and a bike path on the beach, and to preserve these areas in a uniform manner as open space, there is no indication in the language of the initiative as to how to ascertain the answers to the questions noted above as being ambiguous or unclear. Consistency with General Plan The initiative is not inconsistent with the General Plan, which contemplates that the Greenbelt and the beach be maintained as open space. If adopted, the newly enacted provisions could not be amended except by another vote of the people. Consistency with State law As is the case with any municipal ordinance, it is possible that the ordinance could in some circumstances be preempted if in conflict with State law. ' For example, if State law (or the City's NPDES permit) required the construction of a facility on the beach to prevent pollution of ocean waters, it is possible that such a law would supersede the proposed initiative. That determination would have to be made on a case-by-case basis. TITLE AND SUMMARY PREPARED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON THE BEACH AND ON THE GREENBELT The purpose of this initiative is to place on the ballot a proposed ordinance that would zone the City's beach "Restricted Open Space" (0-S-1), which is the same zoning designation as the Greenbelt. The proposed ordinance also would prohibit any new construction, development or improvements in areas zoned O -S-1, other than replacement or repair of existing improvements. Y � City of 2-lertosaTeacit__ April 22, 2004 Roger Creighton 1070 Third Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Dear Roger: This letter is to acknowledge that the City Attorney has approved the minor corrections to your proposed ordinance. They were as follows: 1. Change the word"for" to "or in the opening sentence to read: "The City Attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure: 2. In the paragraph under the title, change the word "proposal" to "proposed" and correct the spelling of "beach". Now reads: The purpose of this initiative is to place on the ballot a proposed ordinance that would zone the City's beach "Restricted Open Space" (0-S-1), which is the same zoning designation as the Greenbelt. 3. Under Section 6, change the wording to: There shall be no modification, amendment or repeal of any provision of this "ordinance without a vote of the people". Very truly yours, Elaine .Doerfling City Clerk Cc: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney %NI MAI IVE MLASUHE 10 BE SUBMII 1ED UIHEG'I LY 1U I Ht VU I tha :'City Attorney has prepared the following title andeimary of the chief purpose and points :he proposed measure: AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON THE BEACH AND ON THE GREENBELT The purpose of this initiative is to place on the ballot a proposed ordinance that would zone the City's beach "Restricted Open Space" (O -S-1), which is the same zoning designation as the Greenbelt. The proposed ordinance also would prohibit any new construction, development or improvements in areas zoned O -S-1, other than replacement or repair or existing improvements. • NOW, THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS :tion 1. The purpose of this initiative is to place Hermosa Beach's two largest public recreation areas, the .tach" and the "Greenbelt Area," under uniform protection. The Greenbelt Area is currently in O -S-1 (Restricted en Space Zone) and subject to the protections applicable to that zone as set forth in Chapter 17.32 of the rmosa Beach Municipal Code. This initiative adds the Beach to the O -S-1 (Restricted Open Space Zone) and :ngthens the protections prohibiting construction, development and improvements in that zone to preserve in petuity for parkland and open space purposes the Greenbelt Area and the Beach. ;tion 2, In order to prohibit construction, development and improvements in the 0-S-1 zone except for repair replacement of existing improvements, Section 17.32.030 B of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, which rently allows additional paving for parking in the O -S-1 zone shall be amended to read in full as follows: 7.32.030 B. Replacement or repairs of existing improvements in the O -S-1 zone within their footprint existing the date of )ption of this ordinance shall be allowed." ;tion 3, In order to add the Beach to existing O -S-1 zone, Section 17.32.040 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal de shall be amended to read in full as follows: 7.32.040 Areas designated. The Greenbelt Area, which is bounded on the north and south by the city limits, on east by the curb face on Ardmore Avenue, and on the west by the curb face on Valley Drive (the "Greenbelt ea"); and the Beach, which is bounded on the north and south by the city limits, on the east by the existing wall the Strand and on the west by the ocean (th8 "Beach"), shall be designated and zoned O -S-1." ;tion 4. Ordinance # 89-1001, adopted by the people on November 7, 1989 is hereby amended to reflect the )ve language changes. ion . In the event that any provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unenforceable, the same shall affect in any respect whatsoever the validity or enforceability of the remainder of the ordinance. 1h n 6. There shall be no modification, amendment or repeal of any provision of this ordinance without a vote th people. NOTICE OF INTENTION e purpose of this initiative is to place Hermosa Beach's two largest public recreation areas, the "Beach" and the reenbelt Area," under uniform protection to preserve by a vote of the people those areas as they now exist for benefit of the public. is measure will prevent the City Council from building any new parking lot on the Greenbelt or a bike path on beach without a vote of the people of Hermosa Beach, Jul 11 2005 7:35AM S 4OREWOOD GARY TINA Hermosian's 3728550 • 3000 Hermosa registered voters signed a petition in support of a peoples initiative that when passed will preserve public open space. The purpose of this people's ordinance is to prevent the City Council from paving any more of the greenbelt for parking, or adding any solid surface on the beach for a bike path without a specific vote of the Hermosa Beach electorate. The citizen proponents of this open space initiative understand that existing law governs certain Health and safety as well as administrative actions. The proponents of this initiative understand the importance of these laws, and. have never verbally implied or intended this ordinance to be a legal barrier to prohibit any necessary health, safety sanitation or infrastructure improvements on or under the beach or greenbelt. This initiative when passed will not cause any change to the City Council's established system and procedures to issue permits for beach activates historically allowed north of 1 e St terminating at 14th St. The power to maintain valuable open space is in.your vote. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION p.1 6b July 6, 2003 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council 2//2/0 -s - Regular Meeting of July 12, 2005 APPOINTMENT TO SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD — MS. JANICE WEBB OF CITIBANK Recommendation: That the City Council accept the re -nomination of Ms. Janice Webb of Citibank to be re- appointed to serve on the South Bay Workforce Investment Board as the representative of the Hermosa Beach private sector for a 4 -year term from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2009. Background: The South Bay Workforce Investment Board is made of representatives from participating cities, including Hermosa Beach. As a federal program that assists in providing training and jobs for area residents, its board members are nominated by the Chamber of Commerce and appointed by the City Council. It will be effective upon your action. Respectfully submitted, Ste.`" en ' : urrell City Manager r Hermosa Beach CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND VISITORS BUREAU June 23, 2005 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: RECEIVED JUN 2 7 2005 Per On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, please accept the re -nomination of the following individual to be re -appointed to serve on the South Bay Workforce Investment Board as representatives of the Hermosa Beach private sector: Seat 22: Ms. Janice Webb with Citibank, to continue serving in a 4 -year term from July 1, 2005, to June 30, 2009. Thank you for your consideration of this re -nominee. Sincerely, da4-ee_ Carla Merriman Executive Director Cc: Janice Webb 1007 Hermosa Avenue Hermosa Beach, California 90254 te1.310.376.0951 fax.310.798.2594 website: www.hbchamber.net i • July 7, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council /1„2,,..c." / ,;./05 Regular Meeting of July 12, 2005 i PARKING CASH KEY PROGRAM -RESIDENTIAL DISCOUNT Recommendation: That the City Council provide direction to staff regarding initialing a resident discount for the Cash Key Program. Background: At its meeting of September 28, 2004, the City Council provided direction tostaff to report back on a cash key program that allows for resident discounts. The present cash key program is available to anyone. We have a total of 259 cash keys in use now. Of the total number, residents have purchased 153. The cash keys are sold at face value, meaning that there is no discount offered to the person purchasing the cash key. The cash key program is strictly an over-the-counter operation now, which means that staff does not have to check any program requirements before selling the cash key to the person wishing to buy the cash key. The cash key system is working well and is growing slowly in use, The cash key is sold in increments as requested by the purchaser. A discounted resident cash key program would result in some changes in how the cash keys are sold to residents. The suggested process would use the same residency requirements that we use for parking permits. A copy of requirements is attached. It would seem that it would be best to only sell the discounted residency keys at the Finance Office, as we have to be able to make sure that all of the requirements are met. It is suggested that off-site sales be considered later rather starting off with that program due to the need to verify the residency requirements. It is also important to point out that once sold, the cash keys can be used by anyone. No limit on the number or amount has been set so far however, so that may be something that the City Council would have to consider shouldit be abused in the future. The revenue that we have been receiving from the present residential users will drop by the amount of the discount. For example a 10% discount on a $50.00 cash key will result in $45.00 to the city. We are selling 153 cash keys to residents and this type of a discount would result in $765.00 less when they refill their cash keys (153x$50=$7650 vs. 153x$45=6885 or $765 less). If the program were successful, the difference would grow to some larger amount. Reducing revenue at this particular time does not seem like a good idea considering that we are in the process of increasing a number of fees for service. The program could be implemented in fairly short order if the City Council wished to proceed with changing the program to add a resident discount component to the cash key program. Respectfully submitted, Stephen Burrell City Manager 7b Parking Permits -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA City of Hermosa Beach Homepage Local Government City Officials City Departments Administration Community Development" Community Resources Finance Fire Department Personnel Police Department Public Works For Residents For Visitors • For Businesses Page 1 of 3 Local Government Home > Departments > Finance > Parking Permits Budget Cash Keys Parking Permits 2005-06 Parking Permits Bus Passes Dog License CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM The Residential Parking Permit Program was established for residents who live or work within the impacted area. This area is defined as follows: bound by the north and south city boundaries, by the Strand on the west, and by Loma or Morningside Drive on the east. This area was established to allow residents to park at any YELLOW POSTED METER without paying the meter or in ONE-HOUR ZONES in the residential areas without regard to one hour limit. The permits are not valid in the two-hour parking zones. Please check signs in your area for enforcement periods. RESTRICTIONS Please be aware that permits are not valid during street sweeping hours or at Commercial Meters (Silver or Green Post.) Permits are not valid on the silver side of a dual colored pole in the residential/commercial area. Also, VEHICLES MAY NOT PARK IN EXCESS OF SEVENTY TWO (72) HOURS in the same parking space. TYPES OF PERMITS There are two types of residential permits available, the permanent sticker and the transferable guest permit. The permanent sticker is permanently assigned and affixed to one vehicle. The transferable guest permit is not assigned to a specific vehicle and hangs from the inside rear view mirror. These permits are very valuable so we encourage everyone to lock their vehicles. Residents may purchase a sticker for each vehicle that is registered in their name and one transferable guest permit per residence per year, as long as one has not already been issued to the address. If you work within the impacted area, you may purchase one permit. PERMITS ARE VALID Permits are valid from March 1 to February 28 each year. The http://www.hermosabch.org/departments/finance/parking.html 7/7/2005 Parking Permits -- City of Hermosa each, CA ii • Page2of3 permits for 2004/05 are $33.00 for the remainder of the year. Permits are prorated .to half price as of September 1st of each year. TO OBTAIN A PERMIT: You may purchase a permit in person Monday through Thursday, 7:00 am to 6:00 pm at City Hall, located at 1315 Valley Drive, Room 101, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, or by mailing the information to the same address. Residents must provide proof of residency less than 30 days old in one of the following forms: 0Current utility bill, bank statement, credit card bill or a bill or statement sent through the mail on a monthly billing cycle O Rental /lease agreement signed within the last 30 days. ta Proof of property ownership -tax bill or new escrow papers a Rental/lease agreement signed within the last 30 days Current renewal form (until April 1st only) Employees of a business located in the impacted area must show a current paycheck stub or letter of employment on company letterhead. All residents and employees must also provide the following: GCurrent vehicle registration in the name of the person requesting the permit Company cars and family vehicles not registered to you require a letter from the registered owner authorizing you to use the vehicle and referencing the vehicle license number 0Valid picture I.D. This may be a driver's license, California ID, passport or military ID JAII outstanding parking violations must be paid prior to purchasing a parking permi REPLACEMENTS If you change cars or break your windshield, bring the receipt, original sticker (peeled from the window) and the registration for the vehicle for which you want the replacement sticker to Room 101, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive. A replacement will be issued for $3.00. Please bring a picture I.D. and a current utility bill as proof of residency. Transferable permits cannot be replaced. If the permit is stolen, a new one may be purchased at the regular price with a police report lttp://www.hermosabch.org/departments/finance/parking.html 7/7/2605 Parking Permits -- City of Hermosa Beach, CA• Page 3 of 3 i FAQ and current proof of residency. If your car is being repaired, a temporary permit for the rental car may be purchased for $1.00 with current proof of residency, a repair estimate from the repair shop and a copy of your car rental agreement. EVENT PERMITS One -day temporary event permits are available to residents who have purchased a parking permit. Permits may be used five times (days) per year with a maximum of twenty permits each time. The cost is $1.00 per permit up to five; permits six through twenty are free. Please bring.a picture I.D. and a current utility bill as proof of residency. For further information call (310)318-0217 or (310)318-0251. Site Map Contact Us Links Feedback Web Cams City of Hermosa Beach, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0239 , http://www.hermosabch.org/departments/finance/parking.html 7/7/2005 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM July 6, 2005 TO:. Stephen Burrell, City Manager FROM: Viki Copeland, Finance Director (K2)44)) RE: Cash Key Information • Below are'some stats on the cash keys purchased through 6/30/05: Number Percent of Purchased Total Hermosa Beach Residents Businesses Out of City Total 153 59% 42 64 259 16% 25% 100% A listing of the businesses purchasing cash keys is attached. In terms of making keys available when we are closed, pre -loaded cash keys could be "signed out" to businesses to sell on the weekend or evening. There is no way however, to add additional money to an existing key without the software. interface and security device that goes on the computer. If we wanted to purchase those for an additional City 24-hour location, the cost would be $500 for the interface and $100 for the security device. Obviously, selling preloaded keys or adding funds to the existing keys is just like handling money, with all the associated internal control issues. Then there is the issue of proof of residence if a discount were given to residents. The rules should be the same as for parking permits and taxi vouchers — current proof of residency would be required each time a purchase is made. It does not seem that we would want anyone but a City employee verifying residency. If you need further information, please let me know. cc: Marcia Hall, Citation Records Administrator C:IData1Docs\WINWORDIcash key stats, info.doc Cash Key's ld from September 16, 2002 through h June 30, 2005 9 Cash Key's issued to HB Residents = 153 Cash Key's issued to Businesses = 42 Cash Key's issued to Out of City Customers = 64 Total 259 Adaza Electric 1636 Hermosa Ave HB Affordable Electric 2019 Springfield HB Airborne Express 1840 Ardmore HB Ann Leung Realty 1332 Hermosa Ave HB Ashley's Deli 828 Pier Ave HB Baker, Burton & Lunoy 515 Pier Ave HB Boston Beer Co. 2032 Monterey BI. HB Brooks Electric 434 PCH HB CIA Construction 1825 Manhattan Ave HB Clear Talk 15 15th Street HB Elegant Nails & Spa 1114 Hermosa Ave HB Frank Creative Work Group Inc. 1035 Aviation HB Glow Hair & Skin Studio 901 Hermosa Ave HB Hair House II 1244 Hermosa Ave HB Hair Mechanicxs 120 Pier HB Harrision Co 808 Strand HB Hermosa Escrow 555 Pier HB Hermosa Hair Studio 901 Hermosa Ave HB Hermosa Lock & Safe 555 Pier HB High Five Boutique 53D Pier Ave HB Inbev 414 2nd Street #360 HB Inland Pacific Mgm't 1713 Artesia HB L3L Design 231 27th Street HB LA Ground 504 Bayview HB La Vita Skin Care 1244 Hermosa Ave HB Lawson Assoc 728 24th Street HB Libiano Investment . 69 10th Street HB Lily Pad 901 Hermosa Ave HB My Monkey House 1868 Hillcrest HB Nike 126 33rd Street Apt C HB NTCH, Inc 703 Pier Ave HB Pedones Pizza 1332 Hermosa Ave HB PV Limo 424 Strand HB Spyder Surf Shop 65 Pier Ave HB The Strand Apartments 1728 Strand HB Terra Firme Group MB JB Plumbing RB Marketshars West RB Marshall Construction RB So. Bay Brokers RB Wachtfogel Construction RB Harbor District WESTMINISTER C:\Documents and Settings\marcia\My Documents\Cashkey's Sold Through 6-30-05 07/05/2005 6414 /,015 July 6, 2005 City Council Meeting July 12, 2005 Mayor and Members • of the City Council BOARD/COMMISSION EXPIRATION OF TERMS - APPOINT PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSIONERS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council appoint from among the applicants to fill the three expired terms on the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission. All appointments are for four-year terms ending June 30, 2009. Background: At its meeting of June 28, 2003, the City Council scheduled applicant interviews for the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission to take place at 6 p.m., July 12, with appointments to follow at the regular meeting. All seven applicants were notified by telephone and mail of the date, time and place of the scheduled interviews. One of the applicants, Dency Nelson, called my office this afternoon and said he had to work next Tuesday night and would therefore be unable to attend the interview but hoped to still be considered for appointment. Appointments are appropriate at this time. Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission - three terms expired June 30, 2005., The applicants are: Noted: Stephen J. Cannella Howard Fishman Christine Hollander' R. Greg McNally, Jr. Stephen ' : i - ", City Manager Ivan W. Mercer Dency L. Nelson Bill Sigler' Elaine Doerfling, City C "k • • PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICANTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION Pa f k si I e e re4 il01 4• eonlm w4 y Name S+ephen L. ('�nnella Address: I I (o (1 + P/G Ce- ) Viebrmv5rc eekcA Occupation/Profession: P-116.1 Te chn C �{ Name of Employer ri lt11 Te C' ' 0 �D 'Y Bus. Phone: 3a 3" 4 (.` 31/S , Address of Employer (-7 A • Co (e 3* j /41)'I % wOt4 � Cu Do 3 Home Phone: 3 w - . ? 1 2 - c2 78 �j o2 -5Y . REFERENCES: Local: ,/N. -fr 441 IP Luio YJ (1-7-9 (( (10- ce 172- rt+ nn v 73f y - Sr 3,7211 (nanny Professional: Qhny 5oUga SOUebu+ /or,� S' l4 a 7 eh Other: ORAL JI FPJ 1\) 0 Le -el f V \ 4k/L.1 \ .g 13; " g9 2 / COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): 19011- Olyr►,pIc. Volts h -Fee r Coacti vari'ci.,S You• -ft, sports 14gS" aoo 3 Ehlarh Fvuo N, Them hey, 4 1 +e(M O U. ° foo ?/a -no q — Cio -e Aad -ed / eO- "Ie v - Why do you wish to become a Commission member? 14 would be 6,7 on or S -r ve -AC 2ommun / in k)Iir £4 2'vc. eAj o'edn I i ti' i n , _ luo kCd /, ICO eo 4-64 k ( 6(7 firo vi ter; f �t (?e e -) (, toi /n Dem l7tfah a' de a- 'Ili 4 "I" &.'fffi / elp ,411{ 7L e eoM'h a c y O.0 literrno$4 /,�e4 c . What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? jo Gare u tai=t4 /ilea r and 5arjeffi s" /rrelen•f- Tem ` t e Mer IIvorK e IrerrnvS4 �J�•C `7No �lfr'�S f I�C Page 1 of 2 Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes X No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. Ph, -re C4A0I Werc. 1 r►, e►4iploy-ed t'S 4 Sol al( Conip.), y. -i Have. -la 1r)e4J d i vc.,1 %t.ts t)li,.g his -/ztuy k » e f o be -fteX;bl-e akee Q .fet play fo 1 r+ied SCt-etice_ 61655 641) (14 69 Bodge A45 -Zcul iut m4 a Lotti- et -411 6 oucr#1m fie F hoard - 1 X c/ (t oS am m 4,e cit 4raiSir. process CcS WEU AS MCt(Ccky -find deci si P>Ac -175 1Wefc -fiNc a t1 oL,de d . - or pni2.P[� oyer 7v peopfr tte� ruA 5cicessiw C4Mfa74 C -6 -601 -red MCQszcre 1".j� ►�►�uh This Board/Commission meets on 1 - TUe S cloy of eVe at 7 ' 00 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes )< No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? 11.0 Comments: t WDu(GP feel Pri f keded Commss(��nz' Witte/ Wow4 tiJeetly in -h.: fle �fC p ys b�1.ecs4 4 X t2.n„ ofell ' tied, 74&ir d d i%icrm In < di •wcicc4.P Signed: Date: Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) Name • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION TWO( F►S hmatin Address: // 3 c)2 - e c v ..... o- 6/Mum '&9116 1,;.1\\( p 5 2005 P. c { c et( x_ Olti OF NEF".105k 9E Home Phone: 3/0 372- 6 /y0 Occupation/Profession: IS knluna Fe/ Name of Employer C I d i' / %u h J4 r' X e G ►1 Bus. Phone: 3 /° 80°2- -5-2- 5 y Address of Employer / "/ 7 ),A o a 4Q14r► &'c h 09- 7601 6 REFERENCES: Local: LA n Ce 1+%icin,a,n (3/0) 376 -700 7 Professional: e tiY)I e✓ (3i c)) P2- 3 Other: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND. SERVICE (past and present): {(�� r Fa✓(C.S Rec CoMMtSSIc-e4 7-0002voS/ Sio keel/ Scre. goa✓�i D -P Pt f e o -ofS -Ce r'✓ e en various c o m M u n ,/7 Ory 4 g 12 4 J-7 c-",5 - 1 C ic/S � Parks / Ce t► •te n r� � 4 I CO» i Soifer (.b alk of f a me I G 1 l e Lc -q p 1.c.P G v o( Why do you wish to become a Commission member? cLt ✓ 1er7- C. ?i Ni LS -S.'? Q71GV/ GIPS I (P 1.0 Co 14-v n L V%iP -HAI' C.i,av^ rh un t " .. c0>„e /e ke SL e Pos Srw e rc L- gssl qt rnebt-fr ha..,( beQh ►riw/u LA, rd (ter ypays What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? SP QS �t a,-. 1' �'ossa�� o,4_, Cc;rnn,4:,, pi01,04-7ry spec�a( Cc 1 pr�gvG" Q4P-'. of SKP�o! t Cv/u�c.•) oiV e,—i 2 ri j ° C -r -' p -v r, az cl 2 S 1/4.14 C-- i►l Vr u n ( � N Page 1 of 2 • • Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? /Yes No (If yes, please explain) f reSevt.l-Ili . So.-ue 07 'go21-S c E-t.e Vi 6 4-itSrrrtJJc t( SoC/_I QL7 . Ucu1c PI� ?(USE' se IF- Skov/r/9 any o(' !'llelr / 01S come 40 Gon'lnit ssl� Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. W v rk E -p r.. e h c,e _ /� n ,A- 1 7S-- ti l - So ISa o . . _ P,frarn Ptrec �g - J'oud�- 4ra1 R" 7 - Pipse.t4 C, or 1'% & &a good, - l9S/- ?/ Serveo� as S a perwiae- (A- 0 s par Ktoly 1 ar) lw,a( corn --T / + Pi G- '- g,a.c2 kus /79Y- ?ifS f1-0.7de f 15.k fM4 Qq evieh-� Sevv, ce. - SQFeIy /ISSPClc'1s/ )nSNvohCe t,rcl«se, C IQ1 n'1S 14 -(A' -C(41 -t- reS0/N 6d''` /� gfi _ foi! (,2,4 JCfeleice 7'/J¢ - if 1►v1tK4( SGS/7ue .5-144c dt- COread), Credevt-i-Ia�. Como./ vSS? cry S / gO4 S — £ Corn Miss. ' c r - -C Yew 1/671-15 (200r d G, le LA -act 1. e aoa rd ' This Board/Commission meets on / Sa 1 es �a` at 7 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes ✓iVo alt-t(QI-1-. How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? (2S Y e ta 2S Comments: c S Q �r ' . r . q .44t 3 w m u r► .► / - . w , S2 -- tD c o nil n ,12 Ir 44's foie_ r a/ . c P r r uvt Signed: Date: Y�J Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) \ .3 aECEIVEn MAY 3 1 2005 ow CITY CLEM CITY of HEBMO!A BEACH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/C.OMMISSION APPLICATION OF COMMISSION -PaL1/ Home Phone: (5/ O) S/ `— V 7/ Address: 014 Occupation/Profession: 44) LS v X21 Name of Employer ��G6& / -tytC-t Bus. Phone: 3/ O 3 /cc-- ot y )/ Address of Employer 3.3-0 )1/J2. e, fla l , z REFERENCES: Local: - (S n ✓,vt /1-f�/ J}(� CLS Professional: -4 /Poi) ID eft..., Other: Pmt ry 4- Cs,(A) .(-t 6),t COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): OA aryv._ -Pt- 114P baravL 124...arhAPA.LY e 44(4." ) P-fU P, 71. Q f C >) , Why do you wish to become a Commission member? .T p pa/14i .;� 441 v What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? ztrI /, ,R. Page of 2 C J • • Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which cowl a construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes i-1 o (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commiss-ip n member. iY\ U C -UP -- vow 0-(9 _ )44_,Z P) 1L.? g/7-1 C _h hre:P___) 4-12 This Board/Commission meets on / at 7 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? / � t)- Comments: , a- -r�?J Vo . ), Signed: Date: Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION 3 • n NAME OF COMMISSION V45, Se_Cleil1. l ICA CANI afri MU al s Name CI( e) Home Phone: 01 3 4 - 301 Address: - Y' :UN „VAL:ht) cry co otHE Occupation/Profession: . et -51 (AAA IA* IA amileAr bf CDIAcqk If\c, Name of Employer Address of Employer 1'12'1 °se, Pi REFERENCES: Local: tivAct L1A Wl(A Professional.: 0 Other: )1(.V\Y A ovvvk ut,c, Bus. Phone:(310) 52-4 -0-1Do COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): r&beaLt-i VI 41 Mi 0,0U:4. wt_A Vatlu oL-NPAidA ck, (1,tfl W\ i,k,v\ Qv /rn,i5 CL\ ciLtARA5 .TL V\CV 51pD(itti Kai 01(90,0 icAt crA OC) 0\c7 V05`01 Why do you wish to become a Commission member? , b`flhk1 clq 01-/kArvi-e.e)( i""b GA ak iateok -to m yo v01(.1, A- 6,1 oPAbl• YYN wem\_, Cur rY1 (k1N-4 pV eq. -A (N\ - What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? DgNit LI- 4"t, itlecealtirki 117 vicymirx. Is9Aa -Li 1)- e/40 eli(Y)/110S0:15e4)-(1`! Pf" a(.3 -A( V I. Ctil • finafir 04- rr,O,K itYfontne.i( 0,4 v tLQ 1 -au. Cif' eoorcil Page 1 of 2 Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could l construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes V No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. 7 o� ,,,,,,� l /ft., aviioyc, i, A. �� ;2C,',' ani eff .;, „L Sc ,A C rcAu,d v„. L kk 0.11,:m41 ok kV, -c awn' ,,1 ' nioy vsq,,,,,„_tt,k4k orn,,e�� rn c'►(c 1,,,,,,,h5,Regi au voA� i y11 SoAt f wykti u - 1- am caViej g04111 o: Ouifirmk tlyl v vv', 5'�uc� r aITY1; Jai (VA- A- L e env c, kr . 61 a� ,1 is .Qfat T)aY4rr 9 ivr tr +��flu r ti -t �,OmQan►e�,, h.aNL b�- �� -t611,0,1 (IA CJ,kYYAk 'It- �tii 6Gliflti.0 MCI 51 a on/L 7'Ict board Monk( �'r caul, Y�ati tm(('' o.l 1 �S�c� un' , aryl n of --''ke, Qa(foi'nira. Xe 1at.va sc,GGtofn , L�5. Anqe/i� L d'v0 T- 6;/ , 0n 1/ti- c f 's 31010v6k aloin/ **e,1 / a��, -pa y Oil purl ,�voif5 c ► i/ C4 ctse�, hof k TA G( An eI e5 a ec v m n O � y This Board/Commission meets on ioi fitle511t1 at 1 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? ! 9 7 9 - / qg 5 ` qq6 ✓ Z')5 /� st l - Comments:. �/ I �; � GU'l7fi JC��I� �tl� � I �(�e' �2�'�eSeal- a'hvtl r W ou le 4c, to eve- m /het 01Juff.r ee3ipla1 ,ey i - fv h-efJ4 nit an,rittoury. Wit Witt Ta4-5 11115510A- ect offorion, /?// Signed: ' Date: 6 Za 05 Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION 4tik6, PeceA'Oh w ifit �i y Name _ I Vcw r 1%. Y ►ere_ v Address: \-;'3 Home Phone: 1:Lxv065,,,k lette,L ie-}earee._ ✓rielli9)1an 310- - (d 6 Occupation/Profession: l�Ol\Tf.1 ✓ 604, Name of Employer govey5 J. 4t . Bus. Phone: Address of Employer / 42'10 LZ6.. Ooof 1-L taut 6 IJe L REFERENCES: � Local: n 4JO,V l�VY y Professional: lfCt&.)�v U110o A 375 5 g J 375 3 .310-7'C 6659 Other: fesAcel- Nge q l 00 S /./q 5 - COMMUNITY COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): A V r) 0014/m, dee - Q01I - r P,Y. Sa k6d,, 5 A1964-;-hijc leaell )CD Why do you wish to become a Commission member? 11)41• OU V(' a YO .}� labs I; F1 t=5 k -o 60/IVO W i+. e_ (!r.�i/)vouni �I Ce ikl) S c iv i'k i 5 yea 4- 413 n 1-k /iced 5 -h )(Rae oar 6,60tYluvirtj etiorinitt /f05/eY." What do you feel are the duties and responsibi ities of a Commission member? .1 a 6eivaiN+ -1-o Are foi./4 ref M ! 55/C Y►ei/:✓oir:. :r- ; ineehers, .�- d to ye i 656/51- Ina o I»1 eri a C` al-pc6 ),,evc, 41Afit S Ooitlu ivr '+0 itoyelot6 c-tgc?Iz✓!itf-Cti� Page1 of 2 Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes X No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. Levr,;-I Mhtm,(0) Y y44;0 q - x000 4 ' iZ1e'V A a 41l 60\ pi” Fee+610 gtiOVe lye - Pee.% r ?,100 0 6 C Ae-tVvioe. •11015 3..1/61}Me J ria ev ao0 5 40v)(+ et) -V1146 — 00 C0 5k,',+ y. 5v4 h4) - .vier - abo t )Dor erl4. nv.pnAer hvLEL-wi -tom vot/Ilk u.;1 This BoarcUCominission meets on ff ile41 /i/at r 00 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes X No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? i)D0 �` ^ re6C/fr Comments: .--I.- 11,.ave VC l) n -}D I Dye `-1n1v‘ 1 V S moo vae4-iul Iea,4e. : 1- s - -a i e c i pm i ti SeI"Va/1 i 6 --Fur e( `Ake. rnyM 14;5 0;4.9 Signed: Date: oVC/5- Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) Name Address: r . • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION N 2 uu 2 (a?Y CS TY f'r ii F fn`.1 B ,gf.Fl % 10/ ;;�� nn . sc a �s F� IV r Pec) rh i sr,`c.� 2.42.creidka„, '��1.A %y / NAME OF COMMISSION o &s , )4` cm,n►uh.li-y ccy L. tittIsnI- Home hone: 3[ e- 31't - i S'43 amts tQ tve. sk-rc I Nvf,AcA.,c v lle.r#A0 Q,...tori, , CA 9015 (1 "re le.i1scr S41:1/4% Maw/,gltr/Ac,_1;s'4iv,4-Di4ec4t Occupation/Profession: Name of Employer t' r ('ems Av‘c-e_ /sc Bus. Phone: (Sctw.e cs.s Address of Employer a s ct iNe'.re- REFERENCES: Local: -N.V.. R.e,ttc aV / -t 264 Kc --4,7 bckrbe b31ct 2‘, Professional: ; Seger '13C1r f ; sc:LG.-e Pro CLle 4401/w s 'MO --2-76 -2cR3 Other: tea:v.e. sllte•r -`_532../S1r,elAc utb379 -1%602, COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): niche V c\'eCJc'l , .l I�l ++� �f�,.. w�sc Jr- acQ�, /f �nl la va �A.f Celt (testi st . \I.:4 J .['a LA X (LA Ylk.:;.,'Jc tt' j Sr tnooi aC.-.14 es P/1;A14. kr.ct ('n kttck:ds 01/44 6' -1is iia-sL4 Ce .sl ..: as krM-(1.0,r..y_Azu.+1-tr w;�s a s t,.AtN-1- L MBv�+btrs`1.: f (�er�„c,��_ �it�• a). slur; atm\ 5er5ak y,%/ 6-vA; ly (►1i.vol-OrS1.-? p t-%zr rcc�; 2 e:<.t. S -sle.,r, C: Q t-:�c.►�'. 2-c•Iiw- 0-»4 Fr t Q,•ds (,C 44.a Pc.r �. �uu..�.t.t., a,,. . Why do you wish to become a Commission member? t.k r.a-s t,•o a ( rl 42-42a 1.'1 % A -L . C...tr tc..t-)./,.t- es 0. 1(1 Cori y P 41 dS -in in re. d 're- 1 hvr, k...42 retook 4s.K4A.4.4' 'rp i-QV:Qw 4J1.1.&C /•'A4. W C C re. Act le r/ • o Mali -0 rj car. Y A. Lt 4.1. t.. 0.;at..442.. CC, n r, -k-t„", 40 s CC,r*kJ ss:ar i r V- ��.� e CI l vt%. c+, - r4 + r S; c ,+ . What' do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? G I I s -- Ck, Scc. c \ e1/4k-w, y a,r-e_ + ' age 1 of 2� ; -y o..�. �J -k 11 naso r. t,.y t j' _ v. -N.e c 4-7 Iv, e riLat beic,Amt75, rt.t Eike i# rPc cec►L rv.e' ` C(4 0 44,,x 11n tQ..0 4%-4' C• (kt, S „.. a Cti :.Ic..h: 7.cL f-tcr.S 5 L-. c in c i v: J- ; 4S Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes k No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you((�feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. 11,tio.•, a c.- @. A' tv, pie at k's Ltd". kA -it �i►�:.p e.rs: +. fit Cal o lrvr t at Se....V e. Cr wz I r..: Y�+ c ew.D�c s.-3 ► w c e,er t C. c.... -a (.-t %h s.svk- 0..44 a r.J •.NaA A.44-scn \ • "+0'-«..+� T. t L.. rs... z\d n r. A_• zits ay.6 e..,a0404,4 1 ‘,./►..a..t Z b tso ell, hed w►y sLN11s eks . Ste-Ntc. 41.0411 10..er . FC .' .44,42 AS{ 2.K .' , P-43, ..r 4.0.44 s+ ICI, -ca v... . oNo. Q w. ve n 44 41.0,, & .+1-o D1 t. . r E S 0,...1 (A 4- , wr.t► (nw.ie t..o..a. et. 5t.- -4+..t cck eQe- 0.4„...4. i New Yoe„t 2 - Ai,.ewr,.•le. a et. C.-eel&v.eo_ LA..e 'IA,- a. LNve-Jc>,-'fo.Pe 1-elevt5i-o0. %e a M.ay.ayar, vV.o ar.i6:y tG it P..1a.0A ezv.cl Io.. 4t�.r: StQ,.‘ vaMA ... p....0 s‘,” CnO '14:, `e.ews G- IN` ".10. "4, l gwwvw/ )0...v.. -et erc.-w.,►..y No0.tea tbi ,I, cja,c.0.S{; 1 aw& Su S4r. C.lei, *& 4....1 42 elk.a.-{ cu..s�..1A Sinn tj oma. 4G1 QV tSt cc -L,- 11.c....} teL.,,.-Q 0.‘So I, .cl.+be; 4'v -e Op 4.4,41 sw►b Ctos1 C-ere.4.0.Akres 1-0C)-2 �of IctgL Skw.i.e( Ulf,... p -r g 4-....i4N-4e. 1_OC z t,.a,..�t+r CA n.e [SO. +t. N\rca . or . CA Qt�.e cn,ir t C Y e-c.reS wo 4..N. at k4.- sss h.e.ae o rbcr,;a.&4+-+. pM ee s Ga...cb.con. } Uw t. po\YLee•( Cery ve,...-t-[.we f ;#e.t.a. -1, -e -A .rr.r.n a 4.to ffr� 1A tut•s4TM3 t 0•C- • t ►o ►.c,. 1-a. "S4- o- qe.%)Z ca^." *ago o.e.4we ay. 4k-4. Cs..... G+1 ex,. A Ce•w-i r0.CA' ' rVe cu-►o.l+ C-�..ytt.�40S ESC. to LausteA (ire 0 zr�..c•401-c Cr4. I .tie •ei c.a.) , c1..4. .: 0..w. we..v4L w 1 4. sawo ro.1 11.1,-..,e1.‘ This Board/Commission meets ont-ttsV �kiscl�.� (YloAts at 1 00 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? )( Yes No -1,-o..re l wv.A 041'%^ ori wre-L wn�S b . �r L pb.2114.. e � �c.. x� w►i SCk•ed,...1Q 4,c `0Q 0.Ve:.lalola c,-. ISA- `ruf.S�i.. (re 4t -t YW6..4,4.. How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? O%# F -r 2l . e 04 cd t o e TT e. h erw.47.04A.w,p r . Comments: y ctvv. ey as.r.o �... �►. tM..,� ►i...C,t..a 1.IciA. 446.1-S Li;,-„Auflu.l 'l.` D•te CA -GA levmN..2 „r 0r.pe.r 2A y �.Ms wI•.trt S �... sL t1..¢.. fiat- ce. w.T Ire? . t wre4 o..� +cw� mired dc..tA Uilr 4....41 rx..cJ Aosta 4S SI -e � tic�01.N4rs Ike, Sl01.N4bwteem � o.A.etb2�.�..a- , a 0.S row• t� •�ct, k Cu,i.w..tw:y l;•r: A..; eS L hope. yc.+ w;1t 0t »+Q a c.sr 444%y C C -1r. ` i rti CGi ., ' W.' S S . o'v_ Signed:Date: 2 , '200 S eLGAtic„.. Page 2 of 2 (4/23/01) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION' NAME OF COMMISSION Name 71 Lt. 5-16 L. ��— JUS 232005 Address: Home Phone: 2)-7- L-( 2ja� Occupation/Profession:c ` el v c Name of Employer C o%13i tt cNr ( NC Bus. Phone: c 3 C G G60 Address of Employer I C-7 ( "iv^1 REFERENCES: Local: S ,4 C( (' 5 Cft L L - Professional: Other: c 1.. COMMUNITY PAnRTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): (` C S ((L., -r- Why do you wish to become a Commission member? l What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? �O Ca1:4‹. T s 5' TN Ar 1!iV�.vELOr,1i6— eF kf2G ' 4N7-, 4,4 Co /Az_ c7_s N `lam i --} (c-'l/'a-GL' 4 . - �C LA -r C . c F L. f. c)E. ✓l Page 1 of 2 [2`cSc,Si`JT( A -Ai Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could by construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes ✓ No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. Qti€ s CU,��ISS.uN -F P-5( C L'et-L k G r LPA --P-1 cc tiS Cc... A.. F, . 0- eCa..4rStuSC,,h. M C or KB This Board/Commission meets on —RV--. S at —7 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes ‘...No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Comments: T t.�. Nvh t NA -TEA r 6t K L> F Uz�� ec M M c. Ss ea � 'J -to P -3E ILA f N � L c -j - i-�. C / N % ..�► l v/ ,alai div;) e 46- A 4 F w , _ D- LA --ry c n-�� h �� 4� �c� (tJ 3/ c�y La (i�r LacE;Ec_ 71 (-6-71 — 7)C f /S cX Signed: �° l S� /1-1& �—� C. JU Date: 7-a, fl E-. (4/23/01) Page 2 of 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 7, 2005 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: STEPHEN BURRELL, CITY MANAGE SUBJECT: SAMPLE WAIVER FORM FOR BELOW GRADE CONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE OR LIVING SPACE . I have attached a sample form that was developed some time ago. A.similar release would be developed and implemented should the City Council approve a policy to require this type of release on all construction below grade. WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER ASSUMPTION OF RISK AND RELEASE. REGARDING RECEIPT OF SURFACE WATERS THIS ASSUMPTION OF RISK AND RELEASE REGARDING RECEIPT OF SURFACE WATERS is made this _ day of ; 2005, by and (hereinafter "Property Owner") in favor of the City of Hermosa Beach (hereinafter "City"), a California municipal corporation. RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner in fee title of property located in the City of Hermosa Beach legally described as Lot — of Tract , or Assessor's parcel: Book _, Page _, Parcel _, together with all improvements, household furnishings and effects, and personal propertylocated therein and thereon, more commonly known as , Hermosa Beach, California (hereinafter "the property"). B. Property owner desires to build/rebuild/remodel/rehabilitate a residential structure on the'property (hereinafter the "construction") and has applied for a building permit for said work. grade; C. Property owner's construction plans call for: the garage or other living space to be located below the street no curbs or gutters along the street frontage of the property; D. . During periods of heavy rainfall, it is likely that surface waters along the public street fronting the property will enter the property due to construction of the residential structure in accordance with the plans as above described.. E. Potential inundation of the property can be avoided by changing the method of construction. Property Owner does not want to change the method of construction to protect against the risk of flooding by surface water, but instead, desires to assume all risk relating to and arising from the issuance of a building permit for said construction with respect to flooding by surface waters, including in particular the risk that the City's issuance of the building permit is negligent in that both the property owner and the City are aware of the potential for flooding if the structure is built as planned. F. As an accommodation to Property Owner, City is willing to allow the construction as proposed, and Property Owner desires to limit the City's potential liability arising from any claim that the City acted negligently or improperly in issuing a building permit to Property Owner under the above-described circumstances. G. Both Property Owner and City agree that this Assumption of Risk and Release Regarding Receipt of Surface Waters does not exculpate City from any future acts of negligence on City's part, but applies solely to the issuance of a building permit for construction of specified improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, as inducement for City to grant a building permit, Property Owner agrees as follows: 1. Assumption of Risk. Property Owner hereby assumes all risk of damages to the property, and loss or impairment of the use and enjoyment thereof, including improvements, household furnishings and effects and personal property located therein and thereon, and including all risk of personal injury, and including loss of any and all expenditures in any manner arising out of or attributable to the City issuing a building permit for the proposed construction, notwithstanding that the property will be susceptible to flooding by surface waters by virtue of Property Owner's chosen method of construction. Property Owners' Initials • 2. Release. Property Owner hereby releases and discharges City, its officers, employees and agents, past and present, from any and all claims, losses, damages or liabilities of or to the property of the undersigned Property Owner (whether for damages to (a) the property, (b) improvements, household furnishings and effects and personal property located therein or thereon, or (c) personal injury), including but not limited to attorney's fees and costs of suit, arising out of or attributable to the City issuing the building permit for the proposed construction, notwithstanding that the property will ID • be susceptible to flooding by surface waters by virtue of Property Owner's chosen method of construction. This release includes, but is not limited to, any claims arising from the City's negligence in issuing the permit. Property Owner hereby expressly agrees to forego the right to assert any claim or bring any action of any nature whatever against City, its officers, employees and agents for any damages or losses of any kind attributable to surface water flooding of the property due to the issuance of a building permit and the work performed pursuant thereto. Property Owners' Initials 3. Indemnification. Property Owner hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its officers, employees and agents from claims, actions damages and liabilities asserted by third parties who suffer injuries or damages (whether personal injury or damage to personal property) by virtue of flooding of the property by surface waters. Property Owners' Initials 4. Voluntary Agreement. Property Owner has obtained the advice of legal counsel and has been advised of the nature and legal effect of the execution of this instrument, or expressly declines to secure the advice of legal counsel, nonetheless has read this instrument carefully, understands the contents hereof and knowingly forgoes the opportunity to seek legal counsel. Property Owner executes this instrument voluntarily with knowledge of its significance in consideration for issuance of a building permit to perform certain construction using a method that Property Owner is aware may result in damage from surface waters. Property Owners' Initials 5. Binding Effect. Property Owner agrees and acknowledges this instrument shall be recorded against the title of the property in the official records of the Los Angeles County Recorder. Property Owners' Initials This instrument shall run with the land and shall be binding on all parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest in or to the property or any portion thereof, and shall constitute notice of the hazard of surface water flooding that affects the property. C;1Documents and Settings\Steve\Local Settings1Temporary Internet Files\OLK3A\release stormwater.doc This instrument shall be terminated or modified only upon the express written consent of City. In the event Property Owner sells, transfers, leases or otherwise conveys any interest or right of possession in the property, Property Owner shall provide any such purchaser, lessee or transferee a copy of this instrument. I UNDERSTAND THAT BY SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT, I AM FOREGOING MY LEGAL RIGHTS. I UNDERSTAND THAT MY CHOICE TO CONSTRUCT A STRUCTURE ON MY PROPERTY IN A WAY THAT MAKES IT VULNERABLE TO FLOODING IS PURELY VOLUNTARY AND THAT I COULD. CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE IN A DIFFERENT WAY TO PROTECT IT FROM SUCH FLOODING. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY HAS AGREED TO ISSUE A BUILDING PERMIT BECAUSE I HAVE RELEASED THE CITY FROM ANY LIABILITY FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE, PERSONAL PROPERTY DAMAGE AND PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING LIABILITY ARISING FROM ITS OWN NEGLIGENCE IN ISSUING THE PERMIT. I UNDERSTAND THAT AS A RESULT OF SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT I DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO SUE THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT OR THE CONSTRUCTION IT AUTHORIZES, IN THE EVENT MY PROPERTY IS FLOODED. I UNDERSTAND THAT I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING THE CITY AGAINST PERSONAL INJURIES TO MY GUESTS AND INVITEES AND DAMAGES TO THEIR PERSONAL PROPERTY. Property Owners' Initials IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Property Owner has executed this assumption of risk and release and indemnity on the date first written above. Property Owner Property Owner C:1Documents and Settings\Steve\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK3A\release stormwater.doc Signature(s) must be acknowledged before a Notary Public: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared known to me to be the person whose name was/were subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that Witness my hand and official seal. executed the same. Signature C:1Documents and Settings\Steve\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK3A\release stormwater.doc 1 PARCEL 3,100 S.F. PA SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS CEL MAP NO. 060281 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 AND A PORTION OF LOT 8 OF TRACT NO. 1072, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 17 PAGE 137 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT 1 HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. LA BIAN0 SUBDIVIDER RECORD OWNER: , LIBIANO mivESTME.s.rtS lisle-, A CALI cP_iJ IA. COQ'vR..-rtoe.S , Ou►)r4 THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 2 UNITS, WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. QR�1- ESS t � l No. 30826 Exp. 03-31-06 ,!.v\ STATE OF CALIFORNIA p__ SS. COUNTY OF c T-,%e\e.s ON \e+ -q -'-,DCPA BEFORE ME, N,qk\ ' A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES) AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND: NOTAR UBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE C . Y .:/_1"2 �."" tZJ-ANC'.,,RY7;1JL.r�_�s. LOS ANG,11::-. CGI) 0 NAME:. ]U'CNR�.e0 PRINT NAME OF NOTARY MY PRINCIPA PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN LOS €_S €_S COUNTY t MY COMMISSION XFIRES O% -a1 --b b ENGINEER'S STATEMENT ',CEI JUN 3 0 2..005 COM. DEV. DEP E THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF LANCE LIBIANO ON 08-05-04. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. GARY J. ROEHL R.C.E. 30826 EXPIRATION: 03-31-06 RECORD DATA WAS TAKEN FROM TRACT NO. 1072, M.B. 17-137 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. Dor.1, C L •. Wc� LFE CITY ENGINEER DEPUTYDATE R.C.E. 02-02-7; EXPIRES 9-30-0,C— COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP; THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER. COUNTY ENGINEER BY DEPUTY R.C.E. NO. EXPIRES CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE DAY OF , 20___ APPORVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 20___. SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE SCALE: 1" = 20' SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS PARCEL V AD \O. 060281 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES A • • INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP * TRACT NO. 1072 M.B. 17-137 ** PARCEL MAP NO. 25404 P.M.B. 295-3-4 BOULEVARD MONTEREY 40' 40' 8 0' N1 71 0' 00"W 8 0' 8TH STREET ED WELL MON. PER TR. NO. 27960 M.B. 863-5-6 40' 40' 0 0 z 0 r7 0 N7T50'00'E • • 50.00' N7T50'00"E SE'LY UNE OF LOT 10 PER * N7T50'00"E 100.00' 1 3,100 S.F. 0 0 0 N z 0 0 N NE'LY LINE OF ** 50.00' N7750'00 "E NW'LY UNE OF ** NW'LY UNE OF LOT 8 PER * AND NW'LY LINE OF ** 6TH STREET FD WELL MON. PER TR. NO. 27960 M.B. 863-5-6 N7T50'O0"E 0 N z 10' 10' 2 0' N171 0' 00"W 2 0' 10' 10' IL! 0 F W i� z