Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/11/06• • AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - Council Chambers, City Hall 1315 Valley Drive 6:OOp.m. MAYOR CITY CLERK Peter Tucker Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Sam Y. Edgerton John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Michael Keegan Stephen R. Burrell J. R. Reviczky CITY ATTORNEY Michael Jenkins CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda as a business item. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on February 28, 2006. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session Will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Macpherson v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: BC172546 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT • Golf without bunkers and hazards would be tame and monotonous. So would IIFe. - B. C. Forbes • AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - Council Chambers, City Hall 1315 Valley Drive 7:10 p.m. MAYOR CITY CLERK Peter Tucker Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Sam Y. Edgerton John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Michael Keegan Stephen R. Burrell J. R. Reviczky CITY ATTORNEY Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer. City Council agendas and staff reports are available for your review on the City's web site located at www.hermosabch.org CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS PRESENTATIONS PRESENTATION BY LEADERSHIP HERMOSA CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF APRIL 1L 2006. • • PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda as a business item. 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction, or to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar, may do so at this time. Comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Comments from the public are limited to three minutes per speaker. Members of the audience may also speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; and, 3) during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. The City Council acknowledges receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in written communications. The Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. NO WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 4, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on March 28, 2006. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file report of Customer Service Surveys/Complaints. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 3, 2006. 2 f . • (e) Recommendation to award the contract to paint streetlight poles on Hermosa Ave. at various locations to Everlast Painting Co. of San Pedro in the original bid amount of $6,600; authorize addition of protective coating to streetlight poles at an additional cost of 4,500; authorize issuance of the appropriate purchasing documents; and authorize the Director of Public Works to make changes to the agreement up to $900. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated April 4, 2006. (f) Recommendation to approve amending the existing Agreement with Psomas to include construction management support services on an on-call basis for various Capital Improvement Projects, for an additional amount of $40,000. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated April 4, 2006. (g) Recommendation to approve amending the agreement with United Storm Water Inc., increasing the FY 05-06 contract amount from $15,505 to $22,000; approve amending the agreement with Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, increasing FY 05-06 contract amount from $113,050 to $125,030; approve amending the agreement with Resource Collection, increasing the FY 05-06 contract amount from $92,088 to $101,297 for each year of the Resource Collection agreement; approve amending the agreement with LA County Dept. of Public Works Maintenance, increasing the contract amount from $4,000 to $5,000; and, authorize the appropriation of the funds necessary to accomplish these changes. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated April 6, 2006. (h) Recommendation to approve Final Map #60637 for a 3 -unit condominium at 1220 Sunset Dr. & 1223 Loma Drive. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 5, 2006. (i) Recommendation to authorize staff to give "Final Notice" to all property owners in the Beach Drive Underground Utility District that have not completed their private utility conversions and to further direct staff to disconnect the overhead utility services to those properties that do not complete the necessary work within 30 -days of receiving said notice. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated April 5, 2006. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 06-1264 — "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-3) TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1255 PROSPECT AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 31, HERMOSA HEIGHTS 'TRACT, BEING LOT 14, BLOCK 84 AND PART OF LOT 7, BLOCK 88 OF SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 29, 2006. 3 • • 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. a. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO MERGE THE PROPERTY AT 726 PROSPECT AVENUE, COMPRISED OF TWO LOTS, INTO ONE PARCEL. (Continued from meeting of March 14, 2006). Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 2006. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: To release the subject lots from the merger requirement, allowing development of the two lots. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS NONE 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR THE LOMITA RAILROAD MUSEUM EXPANSION PROJECT RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to send a letter of support to Congresswoman Jane Harman for the Railroad Museum Expansion Project. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. NONE ADJOURNMENT 4 LEADERSHIP HERMOSA BEACH Leadership Hermosa, Class of 2005 Introductory Presentation of Class Project to City Council April 11, 2006 Table of Contents I. About Leadership Hermosa page 1 II. Executive Summary of Project page 1 III. Project Background page 1 IV. Description of Cigarette Butt Receptacles page 2 V. Project Timeline page 2 VI. Acknowledgments page 3 • • I. About Leadership Hermosa Leadership Hermosa Beach is a year-long program launched in 2003. The purpose of the program is to develop and educate existing and potential leaders within the city. Many graduates of Leadership Hermosa Beach are now members of City Council, Commissions, or the School Board. The Leadership Hermosa Beach program can better prepare any citizen to become more informed and prepared to accept a leadership role in the community. The class is made up of a dynamic cross-section of residents, from renters to landlords, bankers, entrepreneurs and retirees, single and married, parents and pet owners. We are volunteers, surfers, dreamers, and doers. The common thread that has united the class is the shared passion for our town of Hermosa Beach. We all believe that one person can make a difference. II. Executive Summary of Project The Leadership Hermosa Class of 2005 proposes a class project that addresses one of the major sources of trash, litter, and pollution on our beach and around the city: cigarette butts. In the spirit of the upcoming centennial, we feel that the reduction of cigarette butts around our city will have a positive impact on our community. Working with Rick Morgan of the Department of Public works, we have identified a stainless steel, weather- proof cigarette butt disposal unit that can be bolted to existing trash cans throughout the city. As a proof of concept, we propose a pilot study with 4 or 5 units in various locations around the city (selected by Rick Morgan) for approximately 4 weeks. During this period, we would like to know if the units are being used by smokers, determine the ease of maintenance by the appropriate parties, and evaluate ease of installation, aesthetics, and the effects of wind and rain. During the test period, we plan to hold a number of fundraising events to pay for the purchase of approximately 60 additional units. Following the pilot study, we would like to return to City Council with our results and ask for permission to move forward with the installation of the additional units throughout the city of Hermosa Beach. Should the project be approved and the units installed, we plan to hold a "Grand Opening" event, where we call attention to the new cigarette butt receptacles and bring awareness of the cigarette butt problem to the community. III. Project Background Leadership Hermosa Beach classes have the option to plan and execute a class project that will benefit the community. After a number of potential projects were considered, the majority of the class voted to actively support providing for a way to reduce or eliminate the problem of cigarette butt litter in the City of Hermosa Beach. After much debate, we developed a solution to directly reduce this major problem that affects Hermosa Beach residents, beachgoers, and the Santa Monica Bay: the purchase and installation of fire -proof and wind- proof cigarette butt trash recepticles. Advantages to Our Proposal: 1. Directly addresses the problem cigarette butt litter itself (or perhaps, a major portion of the problem) 2. Addresses the problem on a city-wide basis; not just on the beach 3. Our proposal enjoys the support of the Hermosa Beach Department of Public Works 4. The Class of 2005 will provide the units, at no cost to the City as a gift, through fundraising efforts 5. Opens many new avenues of learning and experience for Leadership Hermosa Beach Members 6. Enables many varied opportunities for class participation • N Description of Cigarette Butt Receptacles Our discussions with a company who manufacturers stainless steel receptacles for outdoor use assures us that the units are weather-proof and will not corrode in a marine environment. Each unit costs about $70 and features a locking mechanism. We have purchased 6 units for the test phase. If successful, we plan to order another 60 units to be placed in various locations around the city, located in areas where they will provide the most benefit in reducing the amount of cigarette butt litter. Figure 1: Two view of the cigarette butt receptacles. V. Project Timeline April 11 Presentation of project to City Council April 16 Begin pilot project April 22 First of several fundraising events (date approximate). Fundraising continues through May. May 19 Complete pilot project Late May Present final project details to City Council for approval and purchase additional units Early June Begin installation of units throughout city Late June "Grand Opening" event !. • VI. Acknowledgments We would like to thank the following for their contribution to our project: • The active members of the Class of 2005: Peggy Barr, Alysa Brennen, Carla Buck, Craig Cadwallader, Alan Cheeks, Farn DuPre, Michelle Keegan, Laura Paul, and Ellen Rand. • The Leadership Hermosa Board of Directors: Jeff Bartlett, Christian Champisi, and Laura Paul • Rick Morgan, Director, Hermosa Beach Department of Public Works • Mike Flaherty, Hermosa Beach Department of Public Works • Wayne Shoemaker, Division Chief Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors • Art Yoon • Leadership Hermosa Class of 2006 and alumni • • //i/Ds MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, March 28, 2006, at the hour of 7:15 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Patty Egerer ROLL CALL: Present: Edgerton, Keegan, Reviczky, Mayor Tucker Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS — Councilmember Keegan congratulated Mayor Tucker and his new wife Sienna on their nuptials the previous weekend and wished them many years of happiness. Councilmembers Reviczky and Edgerton also congratulated Mayor Tucker and his bride. Mayor Pro Tempore Edgerton congratulated the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation on their Tenth Annual Fundraiser Dinner Dance, which raised more than $160,000 for the betterment of students in focal schools. Mayor Tucker also congratulated the Education Foundation and thanked Sangria for offering its facilities for the fundraiser. PRESENTATIONS CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION TO LINDA WOLIN HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES Mayor Tucker read the certificate, thanking • Linda Wolin for her service on the School Board from 2003 to 2006 and her work in other civic organizations that had earned her the respect and affection of the community. Linda Wolin gave her best wishes to Mayor Tucker on his marriage and also congratulated the Education Foundation on its very successful fundraiser; said the Foundation and the School District were wonderful and it had been her honor to represent the citizens of the community on the School Board; said she was sorry not to complete her term but hoped to remain involved remotely from her new home; Councilmember Reviczky said Linda would really be missed and would leave a big void to fill. Councilmember Keegan thanked Linda for her years of service, not only on School Board but also working on the staffs of Jane Harman and the late Mike Gordon, her work with preserving the Los Angeles Air Force Base, the 310 area code and other community and regional projects; said she would be greatly missed. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS City Council Minutes 3-28-06 Page 11866 2a e Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Gene Shook — Pavilion developer, said the installation of the traffic signal at Pacific Coast Highway was complete except for the actual connection of electricity, delayed by Southern California Edison and Cal Trans; said Public Works Director Morgan was trying to help but the situation was out of the control of both the Pavilion and the City; and Lisa Holcombe — The PetCare Company, submitted a copy of a letter from Alan Strusser which had been forwarded to the Council and summarized his comments about the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and 16th Street, including jaywalking, signal installation and the recent tragic death of young man at this location; saying there needed to be more visible police enforcement a. Letter from Roger Creighton received on March 20, 2006. No one came forward to address the Council on this item. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions, stating that the Pier Plaza planter/barrier project would be presented to the City Council and that. materials were being chosen with both safety and aesthetics in mind. Action: To receive and file the letter. Motion Edgerton, second Keegan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (n). Motion Keegan, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 14, 2006. Action: To approve as presented the minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 14, 2006. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY CHECK REGISTER NOS. 43344 THROUGH 43479, INCLUSIVE, AND TO APPROVE THE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NOS. 42616, 42928, 43144, 43146, 43170, AND 43183, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items as presented. City Council Minutes 3-28-06 Page 11867 4 • (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE FEBRUARY 2006 FINANCIAL REPORTS: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and 3) Investment report. (e) (f) (g) Action: To receive and file the February 2006 financial reports as presented. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 14, 2006. Action: To approve the agreement with Los Angeles County for Animal Control Services and authorize the Mayor to execute agreement, as recommended by staff. RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 02-626 COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING COMPLEX ADA UPGRADES TO TORRES CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES IN THE AMOUNT OF $308,000; AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER OF $259,000 FROM CIP 00-630 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TO CIP 02-626; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE CONTRACT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO ISSUE CHANGE ORDERS AS NECESSARY WITHIN THE APPROVED BUDGET. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated March 21, 2006. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Authorize the award of construction contract for the Community Center Building Complex ADA Upgrades to Torres Construction Corporation of the City of Los Angeles in the amount of $308,000; (2) Authorize the transfer of $259,000 from CIP 00-630 Capital Improvement Fund to CIP 02-626; (3) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; and (4) Authorize the Director of Public Works to issuechange orders as necessary within the approved budget. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE ATTACHED FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND CBM CONSULTING, INC. FOR AN INCREASE IN THE SCOPE OF SERVICES AND CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $10,730 FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 04-117 MANHATTAN AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS; APPROVE THE ATTACHED FIRST AMENDMENT TO City Council Minutes 3-28-06 Page 11868 • • ! HERMOSA BEACH AND CBM CONSULTING, INC. FOR AN INCREASE IN THE SCOPE OF SERVICES AND CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $6,265 FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 05-120 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - VARIOUS STREETS; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST SAID AMENDMENTS, UPON APPROVAL AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE ADDITIONAL CHANGES TO THE AGREEMENTS UP TO $2,500 FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 04-117 MANHATTAN AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND UP TO $2,500 FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 05-120 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - VARIOUS STREETS TO ADDRESS POTENTIAL UNFORESEEN ISSUES DURING CONSTRUCTION. Memorandum from Public Works .Director Richard Morgan dated March 8, 2006. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Approve the attached First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and CBM Consulting, Inc. for an increase in the scope of services and contract amount of $10,730 for Project No. CIP 04-117 Manhattan Avenue Street Improvements; (2) Approve the attached First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and CBM Consulting, Inc. for an increase in the scope of services and contract 'amount of $6,265 for Project No. CIP 05-120 Street Improvements - Various Streets; (3) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest said amendments, upon approval as to form by the City Attorney; and (4) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make additional changes to the agreements up to $2,500 for Project No. CIP 04-117 Manhattan Avenue Street Improvements and up to $2,500 for Project No. CIP 05- 120 Street Improvements - Various Streets to address potential unforeseen issues during construction. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE TENTATIVE DATE FOR REVIEW OF THE 2006-2007 BUDGET -- THURSDAY, JUNE 1, 2006 AT 7:10 P.M. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated March 16, 2006. (I) Action: To approve the tentative date of Thursday, June 1, 2006 at 7:10 p.m. for review of the'2006-2007 Budget, as recommended by staff. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 15, 2006. Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of February 15, 2006. City Council Minutes 3-28-06 Page 11869 • • (j) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE PROJECT STATUS REPORT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated March 21, 2006. Action: To receive and file the Status Report of capital improvement projects that are either under design or construction as of February 28, 2006, as recommended by staff. (k) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 7, 2006. Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of March 7, 2006. (I) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 21, 2006. Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of March 21, 2006. (m) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROPRIATE $21,825 FROM THE CITIZEN'S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) PROGRAM TO PURCHASE AN ADDITIONAL TWENTY (20) TASER ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICES; APPROPRIATE $20,000 FROM THE CITIZEN'S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) PROGRAM TO PURCHASE ADDITIONAL NETWORK ATTACHED STORAGE FOR THE EXISTING JAIL AND STATION VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM; APPROPRIATE $25,000 FROM THE CITIZEN'S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) PROGRAM TO PURCHASE NETWORK ATTACHED STORAGE FOR THE VEHICLE -MOUNTED DIGITAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED IN ALL PATROL VEHICLES DURING THE 2006/2007 BUDGET YEAR; AND, APPROPRIATE $6,000 FROM THE CITIZEN'S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) PROGRAM TO PURCHASE THE FIRST OF TWELVE (12) VEHICLE -MOUNTED DIGITAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS FOR THE PATROL CAR FLEET. Memorandum from Police Captain Tom Eckert dated March 22, 2006. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) Appropriate $21,825 from the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) program to purchase an additional twenty (20) TASER electronic control devices; (2) Appropriate $20,000 from the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) program to purchase additional network attached storage for the existing jail and station video surveillance system; (3) Appropriate $25,000 from the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) program to purchase network attached storage for the vehicle - City Council Minutes 3-28-06 Page 11870 mounted digital video surveillance devices to be installed in all patrol vehicles during the 2006/2007 budget year; and (4) Appropriate $6,000 from the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) program to purchase the first of twelve (12) vehicle -mounted digital video surveillance systems for the patrol car fleet (n) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR HB 5000 & CITY WALK PROPOSED FOR SATURDAY, APRIL 14, 2007. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Lisa Lynn dated March 21, 2006. Action: To approve the request for HB 5000 & City Walk proposed for Saturday, April 14, 2007, as recommended by staff. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES— None 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION - None 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE "MEN & WOMEN OF THE YEAR" COMMEMORATION. Memorandum from Public Works Director Richard Morgan dated March 21, 2006. Public Works Director Morgan presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Patty Egerer — Hermosa Beach, said plaques lost their significance when there were so many and should not be in the public right-of-way; said if the Chamber of Commerce was allowed to put plaques on the Strand wall, other organizations would want to do the same; Carla Merriman — Executive Director of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Bureau, said the Man and Woman of the Year Award was not a business award and recipients were not necessarily members of the Chamber; said the award wasto iven citizens ci �zens who have contributed numerous hours of service to benefit the community; said a sun dial with plaques in Noble Park was their first choice but the park had development restrictions; said the Chamber could not put the plaque on its building since it did not own the property and thought the plaques should be in an area where people gathered; was willing to work with staff to come back to the Council with other options including one granite plaque with new names etched in each year and other possible locations; City Council Minutes 3-28-06 Page 11871 • • Michael DiVirgilio — Chairman of 100 Acts of Beautification, said that these plaques were one of the proposed acts of beautification for the Centennial celebration; spoke in favor of the proposal and said that this project would be funded by the Chamber; and Gene Shook — member of the Chamber of Commerce Executive Committee, said the Board approved the $10,000 to cover the cost of the project; thought it was important to honor these citizens who were a part of the wonderful history of the City. Action: To direct staff to bring back alternatives, perhaps just one granite plaque to etch in two new names each year, to be located at City Hall, the Community Center, the Historical Society Museum, or another appropriate location. Motion Edgerton, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. b. 1255 PROSPECT AVENUE — ORDINANCE FOR THE ZONE CHANGE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 28, 2006. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 06-1264, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-3) TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1255 PROSPECT AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 31, HERMOSA HEIGHTS TRACT, BEING LOT 14, BLOCK 84 AND PART OF LOT 7, BLOCK 88 OF SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION — 47TH ANNUAL MUNICIPAL SEMINAR. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 21, 2006. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report. Action: It was the consensus of the City Council to approve the attendance of Councilmember Reviczky at the California Contract Cities Association 47th Annual Municipal Seminar from May 18-21, 2006, and to approve reimbursement of expenses in accordance with the City's travel policy. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - None 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL — None City Council Minutes 3-28-06 Page 11872 Mayor Pro Tempore Edgerton requested that the meeting be adjourned in memory of lan Wright, a young man who was fatally struck by a car while crossing Pacific Coast Highway at 16th Street, and he sent his condolences to Ian's family. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned, in memory of lan Wright, on Tuesday, March 28, 2006, at the hour of 7:58 p.m. to a closed session at 6:00 p.m. on April 11, 2006, prior to the Regular Meeting beginning at 7:10 p.m. uty City Clerk City Council Minutes 3-28-06 Page 11873 vchlist Check Register CD • Page: 1 03/20/2006 2:30:04PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH N Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account 43481 3/20/2006 07879 43482 3/20/2006 06093 • 43483 3/20/2006 00444 43484 3/20/2006 10768 4 Vouchers for bank code : 4 Vouchers in this report AVERILL, KEVIN HEARD, LANCE JOHNSON TEREA 18559 18560 18561 MARIN CONSULTING ASSOCIATES 18558 boa Per Diem/ Supervision Class 001-2101-4312 Per Diem/ Supervision Class 001-2101-4312 Per Diem/ Supervision Class 001-2101-4312 Tuition/Averill,Heard,Johnson 001-2101-4312 Total : Total : Total : Total : Bank total : Total vouchers : Amount 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 705.00 705.00 777.00 777.00 Page: vchlist Check Register Page: 1 03/23/2006 5:12:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43485 3/23/2006 12066 AIT 6691 OFFICE SUPPLIES 715-1206-4305 431.91 Total: 431.91 03486 3/23/2006 12470 AMERICA'S TROPHY COMPANY 18328 PIER BENCH PLAQUE/EARLE H GRAY 001-6101-5401 182.94 Total : 182.94 43487 3/23/2006 00152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 586-4158715 MATS & SHOP TOWELS/ FEB 06 001-4204-4309 45.28 586-4168766 MATS & SHOP TOWELS/ FEB 06 001-4204-4309 45.28 Total : 90.56 43488 3/23/2006 13731 BOLIN, JENNIFER Cite 1505014512 Citation Refund #1105011628 001-3302 70.00 Total : 70.00 43489 3/23/2006 08482 BOUND TREE MEDICAL,LLC 50246926 MEDICAL SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT 001-2201-4309 . 322.01 50252800 MEDICAL SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT 001-2201-4309 542.50 • 50253154 Medical Supplies - Fire Dept. 001-2201-4309 158.05 50254851 Medical Supplies - Fire Dept. 001-2201-4309 100.12 Total : 1,122.68 43490 3/23/2006 00016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 4286211111 Water Usage -1/14 to 2/15/06 105-2601-4303 1,487.10 001-6101-4303 5,938.64 001-4204-4303 761.69 109-3304-4303 144.94 Total : 8,332.37 43491 3/23/2006 11819 CAREERTRACK 8334828 Tuition / D. Pagulayan Page: 1 vchlist Check Register Page: 03/23/2006 5:12:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43491 3/23/2006 11819 CAREERTRACK (Continued) 001-4601-4317 99.00 8334830 TUITION / A. DAVIS 001-4601-4317 99.00 8334831 Tuition / K. Crevda 001-4601-4317 99.00 Total : 297.00 492 3/23/2006 00634 CHEVRON AND TEXACO CARD SEF 789-8192088603 GAS CARD PURCHASES/2/7 - 3/9/06 715-2101-4310 291.25 Total : 291.25 43493 3/23/2006 13361 CINGULAR WIRELESS 556214765 CELL PHONE USAGE/2/05 - 3/04/06 001-4202-4304 293.04 Total : 293.04 43494 3/23/2006 04715 COLEN AND LEE 2621 GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMIN. 705-1209-4201 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.00 43495 3/23/2006 07809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 68718767 Office Supplies - Mar 06 001-1208-4305 412.59 68720832 Office Supplies 001-4601-4305 80.22 Total : 492.81 .496 3/23/2006 04689 DATA TICKET, INC. 13018 DMV Record Retrieval - Feb 06 001-1204-4201 255.43 Total : 255.43 43497 3/23/2006 04738 DENN ENGINEERS 344 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY/ 1ST STREET 301-8117-4201 3,600.00 345 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY/ LOMA DRIVE 301-8117-4201 985.00 • Total : 4,585.00 43498 3/23/2006 10668 EXXON MOBIL FLEET/GECC 9924830 GAS CARD PURCH - 2/11-3/10/06 Page: 2 2 vchlist Check Register 03/23/2006 5:12:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 3 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43498 3/23/2006 10668 EXXON MOBIL FLEET/GECC (Continued) 715-2101-4310 3,477.54 715-2201-4310 366.05 715-4201-4310 146.77 715-4202-4310 98.03 715-6101-4310 227.48 715-3302-4310 365.61 715-3104-4310 330.56 715-4601-4310 92.76 715-2601-4310 303.86 715-3102-4310 88.03 001-1250 42.52 Total : 5,539.21 43499 3/23/2006 08422 FIRE INFORMATION SUPPORT SEF 566 Bi -Annual Upgrade FireRMS Codes 001-2201-4201 43500 3/23/2006 12699 GE SECURITY 1131145 43501 3/23/2006 13366 GIBSON, TRACEY 121636 • 43502 3/23/2006 12773 HARRIS, CHERI L. 20060307 43503 3/23/2006 13672 HARWOOD, R. MICHAEL 02/08/2006 43504 3/23/2006 05345 HAWTHORNE, CITY OF 03102006 Lock Boxes/ Fire Dept 001-2201-4305 Total : Total : 1,750.00 1,750.00 2,576.10 2,576.10 Rental Deposit Refund' 001-2111 170.00 Total : 170.00 Transcription/Parks & Rec Mtg 3/7/06 001-4601-4305 120.75 Total : 120.75 Witness Fee Reimb - Bohacik & Saldana 001-3818 300.00 Total : 300.00 05/06 Records Management 001-2101-4251 Total : 19,265.00 19,265.00 Page: 3 /A vchlist Check Register Page: 03/23/2006 5:12:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43505 3/23/2006 04108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, INC 03/20/06 WORKERS' COMP CLAIMS/7593-7632 705-1217-4324 16,715.05 Total : 16,715.05 43506 3/23/2006 12586 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, 06-0269250 Govt Member Dues/ #0269350 001-4201-4315 100.00 Total : 100.00 1,507 3/23/2006 06100 IRON MOUNTAIN OFF-SITE DATA 100951856 Off Site Storage/ Feb 06 715-1206-4201 198.33 Total : 198.33 43508 3/23/2006 00444 JOHNSON, TEREA 18553 Travel Mileage Reimbursement 001-2101-4317 22.72 Total : 22.72 43509 3/23/2006 13734 KOVAC-REEDY, KELLY 18584 Reimb supp/ Neighborhood Watch 001-2101-4201 4,738.19 Total : 4,738.19 43510 3/23/2006 00843 L.A. COUNTY METROPOLITAN 3060659 Bus Pass/Stamp Sales / Mar 06 145-3403-4251 224.00 Total 224.00 43511 3/23/2006 10677 LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES 03/03/2006 Staff Supp Sery - Feb 06 • 140-4707-4201 1,368.50 140-8626-4201 102.00 117-5301-4201 484.50 Total : 1,955.00 43512 3/23/2006 00167 LEARNED LUMBER B7081 Maint. Supplies / Mar 06 001-4204-4309 8.39 B995987 Maintenance Supplies 001-4204-4309 48.63 Total : 57.02 43513 3/23/2006 11452 LEHNER/MARTIN,INC 951964 Demurrage Invoice / Feb 06 001-4601-4305 19.20 Page: 4 vchlist Check Register Page: 5 03/23/2006 5:12:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43513 3/23/2006 43514 3/23/2006 11452 LEHNER/MARTIN,INC (Continued) 02175 LIEBERT, CASSIDY WHITMORE 62321 64393 64394 64395 64396 64398 64399 43515 3/23/2006 07060 MARKS, AARON 43516 3/23/2006 12077 MONSTER TRAK 43517 3/23/2006 10781 PHOENIX FOODSERVICES 43518 3/23/2006 13581 PRICE, JIM 43519 3/23/2006 11539 PROSUM TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 17138 Legal RE: Matter HE050 00035RK 001-1203-4201 Legal RE: Matter HE050 00001RK 001-1203-4201 Legal RE: Matter HE050 00028RK 001-1203-4201 Legal RE: Matter HE050 00029RK 001-1203-4201 Legal RE: Matter HE050 00032RK 001-1203-4201 Legal RE: Matter HE050 00035RK 001-1203-4201 Lead RE: Matter HE050 00036RK 001-1203-4201 974 PER DIEM -TRAINING/ A MARKS 001-2201-4317 2011528 2011532 974 1060 EMP AD/COMM. RES/REC LEADER 001-1203-4201 EMP AD / COMM. RES/OFFICE ASST 001-1203-4201 MEALS -TRAINING/ A. MARKS 001-2201-4317 TRAIN/ LUNCH W THE BUNNY 001-4601-4308 Computer Supp Serv/ Feb 06 Total : 19.20 140.00 505.50 1,343.00 189.00 3,189.31 38.85 42.00 Total : 5,447.66 140.00 Total : 140.00 145.00 175.00 Total : 320.00 68.00 Total : 68.00 400.00 Total : 400.00 Page: 5 vchlist 03/23/2006 5:12:08PM Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 6 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43519 3/23/2006 11539 PROSUM TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (Continued) 43520 • 3/23/2006 03353 S.B.C.U. VISA .521 43522 43523 3/23/2006 03428 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION 3/23/2006 12924 SAPHONY 3/23/2006 13146 SMITH, J.R. 2166047000051962171 216604700005196218. 2166047000051962191 2166054000653264281 216606700082399550 550604122540030001: 550605602540049027: 550605602540049166. 550605602540049184 0031081203 02/28/2006 18552 715-1206-4201 Conference/ M Garofano 001-2201-4317 Conference/ J. Crawford 001-2201-4317 Conference/ A Marks 001-2201-4317 Conference/ B Grebbien. 001-2201-4317 Wireless Headset 001-1201-4305 001-1101-4305 Luncheon meeting 001-1201-4317 Hotel/ J Gomez 001-2201-4317 Hotel/ A Marks 001-2201-4317 Hotel/ J Crawford 001-2201-4317 REPLACE SOLVENT TANK&SOLUTION 715-4206-4201 Website Maint/ Feb 06 715-1206-4201 Travel Mileage Reimbursement 001-2101-4312 Total : Total : Total : Total : 12,300.00 12,300.00 375.00 375.00 375.00 325.00 117.42 117.42 85.23 835.32 813.32 835.32 4,254.03 240.90 240.90 1,657.50 1,657.50 177.00 Total : 177.00 Page: vchlist Check Register Page: 7 03/23/2006 5:12:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa • Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43524 3/23/2006 11196 SORENSEN, W.D. 327055 BEE REMOVAL 001-3302-4201 135.00 Total : 135.00 43525 3/23/2006 00118 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 18551 Citation Surcharge - Feb 06 • 001-3302 15,554.00 Total : 15,554.00 43526 3/23/2006 08812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC CO 200506397 REPLACE MIC/ POLICE AUTO 715-2101-4311 34.28 200506402 INSTALL CUP HOLDER/POLICE AUTO 715-2101-4311 30.31 200506403 INSTALL CUP HOLDER/POLICE AUTO 715-2101-4311 30.31 200506411. 05/06 DISPATCH SERVS/4TH QUARTER 001-2101-4251 106,036.99 001-2201-4251 13,254.63 001-3302-4251 13,254.63 Total : 132,641.15 43527 3/23/2006 09689 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 974 TUITION/ A MARKS 001-2201-4317 575.00 Total : 575.00 013528 3/23/2006 11209 UC REGENTS 06030706 Continuing Education/ Mar 06 001-2201-4201 1,823.26 Total : 1,823.26 43529 3/23/2006 00870 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE 03/01/2006 Memb Renewal #20159/S.Blumenfeld 001-4101-4315 190.00 Total : 190.00 43530 3/23/2006 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 310 372-6373 040311 PERSONNEL FAX LINE/3R-4/4/06 001-1203-4304 33.73 Total : 33.73 43531 3/23/2006 10703 WILLDAN 061-19516 LABOR STANDARDS COMP/ MAR 06 140-8626-4201 2,075.00 Page: 7 vchlist Check Register Page: 8 03/23/2006 5:12:08PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43531 3/23/2006 10703 WILLDAN (Continued) 061-19776 Sr. Building Inspector/ Feb 06 001-4201-4201 43532 3/23/2006 11555 WRIGHT, KENDRICK B. 18586 2005 ASSESSMENT REBATE 105-3105 • 43533 3/23/2006 01206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 0084591 STREET SIGN MAINT SUPP/ MAR 06 001-3104-4309 • 0084631 STREET SIGN MAINT SUPP/ MAR 06 001-3104-4309 43534 3/23/2006 13730 ZURAWSKI, RAYMOND 18505 Citation Refund # 1506016651 001-3302 50 Vouchers for bank code : boa 50 Vouchers In this report 3,750.00 Total : 5,825.00 24.61 Total : 24.61 Total : Total : Bank total : Total vouchers : 798.89 594.83 1,393.72 35.00 35.00 254,431.12 254,431.12 Page: vchlist Check Register Page: 1 03/30/2006 4:53:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43535 3/30/2006 06290 AIR SOURCE INDUSTRIES 440263 Oxygen Refill/ Feb 06 001-2201-4309 261.75 Total : 261.75 .3536 3/30/2006 06827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 6734 Crossing Guard Ser/2-19 to. 3-4-06 001-2102-4201 . 3,110.49 Total : 3,110.49 43537 3/30/2006 13755 ALVARENGA, JUAN 18567 Citation Refund/#1306013856 001-3302 10.00 Total : 10.00 43538 3/30/2006 13757 AMEDEO, GINA 1404002267,1804002E Citation Refund/1104002731 001-3302 135.00 Total : 135.00 43539 3/30/2006 12835 AMN OPTIONS LLC 0306002-1 Ann Maint/Supp - XY maps/05-06 715-1206-4201 2,500.00 Total : 2,500.00 43540 3/30/2006 13750 ANDERSON, KARIN 121976 Trip Refund 001-2111 90.00 Total : 90.00 43541 3/30/2006 05179 AT&T 019 360 8382 001 Long Dist Chgs/2-16 to 3-16-06 Page: 1 -/; vchlist Check Register 03/30/2006 4:53:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 2 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43541 3/30/2006 05179 AT&T (Continued) 001-1121-4304 1.73 001-1132-4304 0.67 001-1141-4304 1.48 001-1201-4304 1.32 001-1202-4304 15.60 001-1203-4304 14.41 001-1208-4304 0.09 001-2101-4304 88.34 001-2201-4304 84.85 001-4101-4304 8.03 001-4201-4304 18.61 001-4202-4304 27.62 001-4204-4321 9.25 001-4601-4304 14.46 001-3302-4304 0.56 715-1206-4304 1.71 001-1204-4304 8.74 Total : 297.47 43542 3/30/2006 13735 BENSON, ALIX V 18590 2005 Assessment Tax Rebate 105-3105 24.61 Total: 24.61 43543 3/30/2006 13742 BEST CONTRACTING SERVICES 99404 RE -ROOFING OF PW CITY MAINT YARD AND •• 301-8633-4201 43544 3/30/2006 08884 BUDGET RENT A CAR 18568 Citation Refund/#1706012469 001-3302 18580 Citation Refund/#1606016137 001-3302 43545 3/30/2006 13743 COHEN, ANDREW 122006 Class Refund 001-2111 Total : Total : 149,424.30 149,424.30 35.00 35.00 70.00 45.00 Total : 45.00 Page: 2 /1 vchlist Check Register Page: 03/30/2006 4:53:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43546 3/30/2006 09614 CONTINENTAL MAPPING SERVICE 31106 300' Noticing - Mar 06 001-4101-4201 1,497.00 Total : 1,497.00 43547 3/30/2006 07809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 68913194 Office Supplies/ Mar 06 • 001-1208-4305 118.74 68913196 Office Supplies/ Mar 06 001-4202-4305 286.85 68913198 Office Supplies/ Mar 06 001-4601-4305 61.62 68913200 Office Supplies/ Mar 06 001-4601-4305 61.62 Total : 528.83 43548 3/30/2006 03674 CPS HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICE INV05608 Recruit Srvs-Pol. Chief/Feb 06 001-1203-4201 3,018.49 Total : 3,018.49 43549 3/30/2006 12129 D 3 EQUIPMENT L50998 Supp/Rubber Engine Mounts 715-3102-4309 65.01 Total : 65.01 43550 3/30/2006 13758 DENIS, HEATHER 18619 Citation Refund/ #1804004405 • 001-3302 55.00 Total : 55.00 43551 3/30/2006 00154 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & 03082006 Shelter Services/ Feb 06 001-3302-4251 93.32 Total : 93.32 43552 3/30/2006 11034 EKLUND'S BLAST OFF 3886 DOWNTOWN STEAM CLEANING/FEB 06 109-3301-4201 1,795.00 109-3304-4201 225.00 Total : 2,020.00 43553 3/30/2006 12729 ENFACT SOLUTIONS, INC. 1073 ADMIN STORM WATER PROGRAM 160-3102-4201 3,825.00 Page: 3 vchlist Check Register Page: 4 03/30/2006 4:53:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43553 3/30/2006 12729 ENFACT SOLUTIONS, INC. (Continued) Total : 3,825.00 43554 3/30/2006 13725 FERRO TECH INDUSTRIES 107157 Easy Scan Software Upgrade 001-4202-4201 447.50 Total : 447.50 43555 3/30/2006 08729 FRENCH, MARILYN K. 18611 2005 ASSESSMENT REBATE • 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 43556 3/30/2006 01320 GALLS/LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO 757408 Uniform Expense/ K. Sullivan 001-2101-4314 176.83 Total : 176.83 43557 3/30/2006 13746 GOMEZ, LESLIE GARCIA Class 10525,528, 534 Inst Pymt/10543,87,90,96-97,22 001-4601-4221 731.50 Total : 731.50 43558 3/30/2006 10836 GRAINGER 9053028040 43559 3/30/2006 12311 GREMAUD, MARIE BAPTISTE 18601 •3560 3/30/2006 13373 HARDY & HARPER, INC. 12974R 43561 3/30/2006 02102 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 032060128 43562 3/30/2006 12773 HARRIS, CHERI L. 20060315 Pullover boots/ PW Inspectors 001-4202-4305 19.44 Total : 19.44 Inst. Pymt/ Class 10649, 10654 001-4601-4221 Total : STREET IMPROVFJ20TH FROM VALLEY TO 301-8115-4201 Total : 371.00 • 371.00 7,085.60 7,085.60 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT/PIER PHASE 301-8630-4201 1,803.54 Total : 1,803.54 Transc./PW Comm Mtg 3/15/06 001-4202-4201 73.50 Total : 73.50 Page: 4 vchlist 03/30/2006 4:53:24PM Check Register Page: 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43563 3/30/2006 06518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. 2533 Plan Check / 3-12-06 001-4201-4201 562.50 2536 Plan Check / 3-12-06 001-4201-4201 3,371.74 2538 Plan Check / 3-12-06 001-4201-4201 12,600.35 Total : 16,534.59 43564 3/30/2006 10740 HAZELRIGG RISK MANAGEMENTS 2002170 Claims Admin/4th Qrt FY05/06 705-1217-4201 7,161.25 Total : 7,161.25 43565 3/30/2006 04108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, INC Checks 7633-7665 Workers Comp Claims/7633-7665 705-1217-4324 11,175.96 Total : 11,175.96 • 43566 3/30/2006 00065 HERMOSA BEACH CAR WASH, ZIP! 030106 Car Wash/ Feb 06 715-2101-4311 220.95 715-4201-4311 10.90 715-4202-4311 4.95 715-4601-4311 5.95 Total : 242.75 43567 3/30/2006 12919 HOPKINS CONSTRUCTION CO., GE 6202 MUNICIPAL PIER RENOVATION PHASE III 122-2024 69,446.34 123-2024 48,473.15 125-2024 10,000.00 160-2024 15,967.40 301-2024 3,334.62 302-2024 15,520.50 122-8630-4201 11,729.06 Total : 174,471.07 43568 3/30/2006 11625 INTELLICEPT 7212 SKATE BOARD STOPPER MATER 301-8630-4201 357.64 Total : 357.64 43569 3/30/2006 02474 JUCEVIC, EDMUND L. 122091 Class Refund Page: 5 1.1 vchlist Check Register Page: 6 03/30/2006 4:53:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43569 3/30/2006 02474 JUCEVIC, EDMUND L. (Continued) 001-2111 65.00 Total : 65.00 43570 3/30/2006 13744 KING-POWELL, DEBRA 122090 Class Refund 001-2111 65.00 Total : 65.00 3571 3/30/2006 00151 L.A. CO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 83236 Arrestee Processing Fee/Dec05 001-2101-4251 291.68 Total : 291.68 43572 3/30/2006 13756 LEWIN, JOSANNA .18618 Citation Refund/ #1406019677 001-3302 25.00 Total : 25.00 17,216.25 3,834.65 3,130.63 Total : 24,181.53 Inst Pymt/10431,34,37,43,46,49 001-4601-4221 2,793.00 Total : 2,793.00 24.61 Total : 24.61 38.00 Total : 38.00 43577 3/30/2006 08170 MUNICIPAL MAINT. EQUIPMENT 0036205 -IN Auto Maint Supplies/ Feb 06 715-3302-4311 247.21 43573 3/30/2006 02175 LIEBERT, CASSIDY WHITMORE 64397 Legal RE: HE050 00034RK 001-1203-4201 64400 Legal RE: HE050 00037RK 001-1203-4201 64401 Legal RE: HE050 00038RK 001-1203-4201 43574 3/30/2006 12599 LOCKLEAR, DEREK BRENT Class 10452 • 43575 3/30/2006 08178 MCDONALD, DOROTHY 18610 43576 3/30/2006 13752 MINAMI, ARDEN 18594 2005 Assessment Tax Rebate 105-3105 Citation Refund/ #1404004315 001-3302 Page: vchlist Check Register Page: 7 03/30/2006 4:53:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43577 3/30/2006 08170 MUNICIPAL MAINT. EQUIPMENT (Continued) Total : 247.21 43578 3/30/2006 07634 MUSIC ROOM PRODUCTIONS HB032106 Cassette Copies / Police Dept 001-2101-4201 391.24 • Total : 391.24 •43579 3/30/2006 13114 OFFICE DEPOT 328175730-001 Office Supplies / Mar 06 001-1204-4305 78.85 329005412-001 Office Suppplies/ Mar 06 715-1206-4305 77.90 Total : 156.75 43580 3/30/2006 13748 PAGULAYAN, DANTE 18591 Reimb supp/St.Pat's Day Decor 001-4601-4308 143.21 Total : 143.21 43581 3/30/2006 10139 PARKING CONCEPTS INC. 2840206 05/06 ANNUAL OPERATIONS PARKING 109-3304-4231 15,090.42 2850206 05/06 OPERATING EXPENSES LOT A 109-3305-4231 9,287.47 Total : 24,377.89 43582 3/30/2006 12051 QUARTERMASTER INC. R651348500010 Uniforms/ T. Carter • 001-2101-4314 250.59 Total : 250.59 43583 3/30/2006 13751 RAMOS, ANA MERCEDES 18581 Citation Refund/ # 1606016399 001-3302 30.00 Total : 30.00 43584 3/30/2006 04800 RAY, VINCE 18602 Inst Pymt/ Class 10319, 29-31 001-4601-4221 560.00 Total : 560.00 43585 3/30/2006 13301 RESOURCE COLLECTION, THE 0126650 -IN 2005/06 JANITORIAL SERVICES 001-4204-4201 7,718.00 Total : 7,718.00 Page: 7 1, vchlist 03/30/2006 4:53:24PM Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 8 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43586 43587 *588 43589 3/30/2006 13051 ROBERTS, SCOTT 3/30/2006 13753 ROPKA, BONNIE 3/30/2006 03726 RUSHER AIR CONDITIONING 3/30/2006 00321 SBC .3590 3/30/2006 13657 SEITZ, MICHAEL 43591 3/30/2006 07518 SELTZER & ASSOC., JULES 18604 18588 110831 331 254-6071 301 5 333 267-6155 686 9 333 267-6160 767 0 333 267-6161 416 3 333 267-6164 193 5 333 267-6165 717 0 Inst Pymt/ Class 10275 001-4601-4221 Citation refund/ #1705012198 001-3302 Repair of Heater/Comm. Center 001-4204-4201 Circuit Billing/ 3-7 to 4-6-06 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/ 3-7 to 4-6-06 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/ 3-7 to 4-6-06 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/ 3-7 to 4-6-06 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/ 3-7 to 4-6-06 001-2101-4304 Circuit Billing/ 3-7 to 4-6-06 001-2101-4304 32806 FIRE STATION LOBBY REMODEL 180-8610-4201 33006 FIRE STATION LOBBY REMODEL 180-8610-4201 89834 43592 3/30/2006 07228 SHAAL, ROBERT 18626 Keyboard Platform 705-1217-4305 2005 Assessment Tax Rebate 560.70 Total : 560.70 35.00 Total : 35.00 208.00 Total : 208.00 57.66 188.36 59.44 59.44 50.68 50.68 Total : 466.26 Total : Total : 2,750.00 3,500.00 6,250.00 237.55 237.55 Page: 8 vchlist Check Register Page: 03/30/2006 4:53:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43592 3/30/2006 07228 SHAAL, ROBERT (Continued) 105-3105 43593 3/30/2006 09811 SIGLER, WILLIAM E. 18603 Inst Pymt/ Class 10815, 10816 • 001-4601-4221 Total : 948.50 24.61 Total : 24.61 948.50 43594 3/30/2006 00113 SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER 90272 Recharge Fire Extinguisher/ PD 001-2101-4309 10.00 Total : 10.00 43595 3/30/2006 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON C 03092006 Electrical Billing - Feb 06 001-4204-4303 156.87 001-6101-4303 480.65 105-2601-4303 13,507.11 001-3104-4303 89.21 109-3304-4303 2,240.31 Total : 16,474.15 43596 3/30/2006 12930 SPANGLER, DANIELLE 18605 Inst Pymt/ Class 10419 001-4601-4221 654.50 Total : 654.50 03597 3/30/2006 10232 SPICERS PAPER,INC. 600677 Paper Purchase/ Mar 06 001-1208-4305 901.00 001-2021 16.96 001-2022 -16.96 Total : 901.00 43598 3/30/2006 13749 SUBWAY, HERMOSA BEACH 2205 Meals/ Lunch w The Bunny 001-4601-4308 493.35 Total : 493.35 43599 3/30/2006 06409 SULLY -MILLER CONTRACTING CO. 138732 Maint Supplies, Asphalt/Mar 06 001-3104-4309 776.59 Total : 776.59 Page: 9 Sr4 vchlist Check Register 03/30/2006 4:53:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 10 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43600 3/30/2006 09078 TRUGREEN LAND CARE REGIONAL 2454562996-1 Bowling Green Renovation 001-8534-4201 3,000.00 2454881625 Tree Trim -Hermosa Ave Median 105-2601-4201 1,600.00 2454929741 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 001-6101-4201 15,878.14 105-2601-4201 695.25 109-33014201 257.50 001-6101-4201 257.50 2454929742 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 109-3301-4201 927.00 105-2601-4201 2,575.00 Total : 25,190.39 43601 3/30/2006 08097 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA REF # 263553 Safekeeping Fees/ Feb 06 001-1141-4201 291.67 Total : 291.67 43602 3/30/2006 12992 V & V MANUFACTURING 24140 Badges w Holders/ Police Dept 001-2101-4314 501.40 Total : 501.40 43603 3/30/2006 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 011874 1166698661 0 Phone Charges/Mar 06 715-1206-4304 222.93 001-3302-4304 65.46 ' 001-2101-4304 1,271.73 001-4204-4321 59.45 001-2201-4304 244.70 001-4601-4304 151.05 001-4202-4304 121.28 001-4201-4304 86.85 109-3304-4304 31.21 001-1204-4304 32.80 310 167-1756 Phone Charges/ Mar 06 001-2101-4304 264.64 Page: 10 vchlist Check Register Page: 11 03/30/2006 4:53:24PM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43603 3/30/2006 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA (Continued) 310 372-6186 Phone Charges -Fax Line/ Mar 06 001-1101-4304 11.52 001-1121-4304 10.32 001-1201-4304 14.00 310 376-6984 720712 Phone Charges/2-16 to 3-16-06 001-1121-4304 21.98 001-1132-4304 9.02 001-1141-4304 5.64 001-1201-4304 21.98 001-1202-4304 89.06 001-1203-4304 52.42 001-1208-4304 2.82 001-2101-4304 497.20 001-2201-4304 347.24 001-4101-4304 66.51 001-4201-4304 93.58 001-4202-4304 242.39 001-4601-4304 133.60 001-1204-4304 73.84 001-3302-4304 10.71 715-1206-4304 23.11 310 PLO -0346 Circuit Billing/ Mar 06 001-2101-4304 41.94 310 PLO -0347 Circuit Billing/ Mar 06 001-2101-4304 41.94 Total : 4,362.92 43604 3/30/2006 03209 VERIZON WIRELESS -LA 2026796135 Cell Phone Usage/ Mar 06 001-2101-4304 234.80 Total : 234.80 43605 3/30/2006 13745 WELLBROCK, RILEY 121975 Class Refund 001-2111 200.00 Total : 200.00 43606 3/30/2006 06274 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY 0810221330 CA Jury lnstruc/10/05 Pamphlet Page: 11 vchlist 03/30/2006 4:53:24PM Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Page: 12 Bank code : boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 43606 • 3/30/2006 06274 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY (Continued). 001-2101-4201 77.12 Total : 77.12 43607 3/30/2006 13754 WOLFE, KATHLEEN 1 18582 Citation Refund/ #1306013771 001-3302 30.00 73 Vouchers for bank code : boa 73 Vouchers in this report "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages A / inclusive, of the check register for io— O are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Date 4#) FDirector Total : 30.00 Bank total : 508,035.27 Total vouchers : 508,035.27 Page: 12 Ott April 4, 2006 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council April 11, 2006 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please ratify the following request for cancellation of the check listed below: #43142 — 2/16/06 — R. Michael Harwood — $300.00 The check was lost in the mail. A stop payment has been placed #43436 - 03/16/06 — Trish Greenspon — $254.10 The check was made payable to the wrong vendor. The check was not mailed. Concur: Stephen R City Mana rrell, "S WevK4,,. (Lr beeo-rt) John M. Workman, City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director • April 6, 2006 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council le-c-/f2-cJ ///0-6 Regular Meeting of April 11, 2006 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 1 :AP.RIL25,. 2006 Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of April 4, 2006. Community Resources Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of April 18, 2006. Community Development Director Activity Reports — March 2006 All Departments MAY9, 2006 Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of April 19, 2006. Public Works Director Supplemental Assessment District for Street Lighting and Landscaping — Resolution of Intention Public Works Director MAY 23, 2006_ Text amendment to allow large spa facilities in the C-2 and C-3 zones subject to a Conditional Use Permit Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of May 2, 2006. Community Resources Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 2006. Community Development Director Activity Reports — April 2006 All Departments THURSDAY, JUNE 1, 200:6 P BUDGET WORKSHOP JUNE 13, 2006: Public Hearing: Adopt Budget Finance Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of May 17, 2006. Public Works Director Q�li• W/VO -6) April 3, 2006 Regular Meeting of April 11, 2006 Mayor and Members of the City Council REPORT OF CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEYS/COMPLAINTS Recommendation: To receive and file the report. ComplaintlSurvey Summary The department in this summary has been abbreviated (FC = Finance Cashier). This summary report includes surveys received in the City Clerk's office from the 1st of January through the 31st of March, 2006. No complaints or letters were received during the specified time period. The following summarizes the four surveys received: Dept(s) Date Rec'd Service Additional comments FC 02-06-06 Excellent FC 02-28-06 Excellent Improvement needed in the area of helpfulness, would appreciate having renewal notices mailed to his home to avoid having to renew his parking permit in person FC 03-23-06 Excellent Commended staff for being helpful, prompt and Pleasant on the phone and at the counter FC 12-13-05 Excellent Commended staff for being nice and helpful and for providing good and friendly service ty Manager Elaine Doerfling, City Cler 2d • Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Recommendation: • April 4, 2006 ,////0.4 Regular Meeting of April 11, 2006 AWARD PAINTING OF STREETLIGHT POLES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ON HERMOSA AVENUE It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Award the contract to paint streetlight poles on Hermosa Ave. at various locations to Everlast Painting Co. of San Pedro in the original bid amount of $6,600; 2. Authorize addition of protective coating to streetlight poles at an additional cost of 4,500; 3. Authorize issuance of the appropriate purchasing documents; and 4. Authorize the Director of Public Works to make changes to the agreement up to $900. Summary: Specifications were prepared and requests for bid notices were sent to four (4) interested and qualified companies. In addition, this project was advertised in the Easy Reader. On Monday, January 30, 2006, a mandatory pre-bid meeting and site inspection were held. On Thursday, February 9, 2006, the City Clerk received four bids which were publicly opened and read aloud. The bid results were as follows: COMPANY CITY AMOUNT A.J. Fistes Corp. Signal Hill 10,556.00 KM Industrial Long Beach 24,375.00 Lightpole Restoration Specialist, Inc. Simi Valley 16,900.00 Everlast Painting Co. San Pedro 6,600.00 It was determined that since the lowest responsible bidder's proposal was well within the amount budgeted for this project, an second coat of urethane, at a cost of $4,500, which would extend the life of the painted poles and at the same time protecting the new look, could be added. Fiscal Impact: This is a budgeted item in the FY 05-06 budget in the amount of $12,000 under Lighting and Landscaping (105-2601-4201). Respectfully submitted, LaCUL Michael Flaherty • Public Works Superintendent Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Cop and Finance Director Concur: Richard.'r. organ, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: S -• e .Burr Ci y Manager F:\B951PWFILESICCITEMSIhermosa ave streetlight painting - award contract 4-11-06.doc • Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council • April 4, 2006 y/�/ Regular Meeting of April 11, 2006 INCREASE NOT -TO -EXCEED AGREEMENT FIGURE TO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR PSOMAS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve amending the existing Agreement with Psomas to include construction management support services on an on-call basis for various Capital Improvement Projects, for an additional amount of $40,000. Summary: Staff solicited qualifications and hourly rates from engineering consulting firms to be considered to provide interim Capital Improvement Project management services on a full- time basis, while the City recruited for two vacated Associate Engineer positions. Firms were evaluated based on the scope of the services, resumes of key personnel and the fee schedule. Staff selected Psomas, a full service civil engineering firm. Psomas personnel has been instrumental in expediting completion of the Pier Renovation Project Phase III punch -list, receipt of closeout documents, negotiation of the final charige order and compilation of invoices and backup required for grant funding reimbursements. Additionally, Psomas personnel have assisted with management and expediting progress of several other CIP Projects currently in the design and bidding phases. Psomas has now expended the original contract amount therefore staff is requesting an increase to allow them to continue providing services for the next two months. Staff has filled the two vacant Associate Engineer positions and will be fully staffed by then. It is recommended that Staff utilize Psomas personnel to assist staff with construction management services on the following CIP projects: + 99-631 Beach Restroom Rehabilitation + 05-643 Pier Concrete Deck Treatment + 05-121. Aviation Blvd. Street Tree Project + 04-535 Clark Field Improvements + 04-116 Pier Avenue Rehabilitation — trial striping project + 04-117 Manhattan Avenue Street Improvements + 05-120 Street Improvements- Various Streets + 04-112/05-110 Slurry/Crack Seal Various Streets + 05-109 Concrete Street Improvements, Various locations + non-CIP 008-05 Police Department HVAC Upgrade + Pier Plaza Clock/Barrier Staff therefore recommends approval of this increase to include construction management services. Fiscal Impact: 2f Cost of the construction management services would be charged to the individual projects just as payroll is charged when the position is filled. Respectfully submitted, 4 Richard . Morgan, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Co eland Finance Director Concur: Stephenv'. =T cell City Ma . ger F:1B951PWFILESICCITEMS\amend Psomas agrmt 04-11-06.doc • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council //A 4 April 6, 2006 Regular Meeting of April 11, 2006 APPROVE AMENDING PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE PROVIDER AGREEMENTS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve amending the agreement with United Storm Water Inc., increasing the FY 05-06 contract amount from $15,505 to $22,000; 2. Approve amending the agreement with Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, increasing FY 05-06 contract amount from $113,050 to $125,030; 3. Approve amending the agreement with Resource Collection, increasing the FY 05-06 contract amount from $92,088 to $101,297 for each year of the Resource Collection agreement; 4. Approve amending the agreement with LA County Dept. of Public Works Maintenance, increasing the contract amount from $4,000 to $5,000; and 5. Authorize the appropriation of the funds necessary to accomplish these changes. Summary: There have been many situations this year that have made it necessary to request this additional funding. They include the following: 1. United Storm Water United Storm Water maintains the storm drain filters and cleans catch basins citywide; this firm has been the City's contractor for this service for several years. Reasons for this request include the following: • There has been a need to increase the frequency of cleaning the storm drains for the Beach Drive area near the commercial businesses. • increased need to replace broken frames and filters citywide. 2. Empire Pipe Cleaning & Equipment This firm provides hydroflushing services for the City's sewer system. The number of sewer emergencies has been quite high so far this year and Empire has provided emergency services when needed. In addition, there's been an increased need to clean lines in and around the Beach Drive commercial business area. This firm's services have also been used to do work in advance of undergrounding projects which was unanticipated. 3. The Resource Collection The Resource Collection is the new janitorial services provider and has proven to be up to the task in this, the first year of the agreement. Several items of service have been determined to be necessary by Staff and have been added to the original agreement. These items include • Cleaning steps and walkways in and around the City Hall Complex. • Cleaning steps and walkways in and around the Community Center. • Additional carpet cleaning has been requested this year. 2g 4. Los Angeles County Ott. of Public Works • LA County Dept. of Public Works maintains the traffic signals the City gained as part of the Artesia Boulevard Relinquishment. High winds this year have caused damage to the street signs and the signal lights. Fiscal Impact: The Empire Pipe Cleaning & Equipment and United Storni Water, Inc. contracts are charged to the 160 Sewer Fund and the additional appropriation necessary from this fund is $4,840. EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING & EQUIPMENT UNITED STORM WATER 160-3102-4201 160-3102-4201 302-3104-4251 Amended contract total 125,030 • Amended contract total 22,000 Hydroflushing Budget 125,030 Janitorial Budget Storm Drain Filter Cleaning Budget 17,160 Signal Maintenance Budget 4,000 Requested Add'I. Appropriation 0 Requested Add'I. Appropriation 0 THE RESOURCE COLLECTION LA COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 001-4204-4201 302-3104-4251 Amended contract total including contingency • 101,297 Amended contract total including contingency 5,000 Janitorial Budget • 105,000 Signal Maintenance Budget 4,000 Requested Add'I. Appropriation 0 Requested Add'I. Appropriation 1,000 No addition appropriation is requested for the janitorial services request and an additional appropriation of $1,000 is requested for the traffic signal maintenance account. Respectfully submitted, Michael Flaherty / % Public Works Superintendent /2' Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Cope'hnd Finance Director Concur: Richard it organ Director of Public Works/City Engineer Steph :'' u ell City - ager F:1B951PWFILESICCITEMS\contract co's - United Storm Water, Resoruce Coll, Empire 4-11-06.doc 2 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL • &4-d-fizRi-gLJ April 5, 2006 Regular Meeting of April 11, 2006 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP NO. 60637 (C.U.P. CON NO. 04-7, PDP NO. 04-8) LOCATION: 1220 SUNSET DRIVE AND 1223 LOMA DRIVE APPLICANT: ANDREW IGLOI REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Tract Map No. 60637 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a three -unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No.60637 at their April 20, 2004 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of {Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. 2h Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Sol Blumen Id, P 'rector Community Develop , t Department Stepheit. F ell IF City !Prager 2 Respectfully submitted, obertson Senior Planner F:b951cd\fm1220sunset 1 2 3 5 6 $ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 06- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 60637, FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A THREE - UNIT CONDOMINIUM, LOCATED AT 1220 SUNSET DRIVE AND 1223 LOMA DRIVE IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA RECITALS (i) On April 20, 2004 the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application of Andrew Igloi (the "Applicant" hereinafter) for approval of Tentative Parcel Map No.60637 and, upon conclusion of said public hearing on April 20, 2004 the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 04- 16 recommending that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map No.60637. (ii) On April 11, 2006 the Applicant filed an application for approval of Final Parcel Map No. 60637 (the "Application" hereinafter), as described in the title of this Resolution. (iii) Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.08.040, the City Engineer has reviewed Final Parcel Map No. 60637 and determined that the map is technically correct, conforms to the approved Tentative Parcel Map and is in compliance with applicable provisions of Title 16 of the Municipal Code and of the Subdivision Map Act. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Pursuant to Section 16.08.040 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the Final Parcel Map to be in substantial conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map, with Title 7, Division 2, Chapter 3 of the California Government Code and with the applicable provisions of Title 16 of the Municipal Code. Based on the foregoing finding, the Council hereby approves Final Parcel Map No. 60637 as presented. The Council further authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreement for installation of public improvements required by Tentative Parcel Map No. 60637 and not yet completed as of the date hereof. 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Applicant. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2006. Mayor f:\b95\cd\fm 122Osunsetrs. doc V/1//17- April 5, 2006 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 11, 2006 BEACH DRIVE UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT— FINAL NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS TO COMPLETE PRIVATE CONVERSIONS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to give "Final Notice" to all property owners that have not completed their private utility conversions and to further direct staff to disconnect the overhead utility services to those properties that do not complete the necessary work within 30 -days of receiving said notice. Summary: The Beach Drive Underground Utility District is presently in the final phases of completing the conversion from overhead to the new underground utility system. Edison and Verizon have begun transferring properties to the underground system. The wooden service poles and overhead wires cannot be removed until every property has completed their private property utility conversion. The property owners were noticed at the beginning of this project of this requirement and the majority have either completed or at least started this work, but a few have not yet begun. The City's Municipal Code (Section 13.08.110) provides two options to remedy this situation: The first option is for the City Engineer to post a written notice on the property and then thirty (30) days thereafter to disconnect the overhead utilities serving the property. The second option is to properly notice the property owner and thirty (30) days following receipt of notice to cause for the conversion work to be completed on private property, in which case the costs will be assessed against the property benefited. Staff is concemed about going onto private property and also feels that noticing the first option is more likely to prompt the initiative of the property owner to complete these improvements themselves. Therefore staff recommends the first option of simply disconnecting the services. Staffs proposal is to first mail a letter to all properties that have not yet completed these conversions informing them one last time of the situation and then when the utility companies inform the City that they are within 30 -days of removing the poles the City will issue the "Final Notice". Hopefully, this method will affect quick response and it will not be necessary to disconnect any properties. Fiscal Impact: None Attachment: Muni Code Section 13.08.110 Respectfully submitted, Richard D. Morgan, P.E./ Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur. Stephen City M: ager e • • 13.08. 110 Responsibility of property owners to provide service connection- -Effect of noncompliance. A. Every person owning, operating, leasing, occupying or renting a building or . structure within a district shall construct and provide that portion of the service connection on his property between the facilities referred to in Section 13.08.100 and the termination facility on or within said building or structure being served; B. In the event any person owning, operating, leasing, occupying or renting said property does not comply with the provisions of subsection A of this section within the time provided for in the resolution enacted pursuant to Section 13.08.040, the city engineer shall post written notice on the property being served and thirty (30) days thereafter may authorize the disconnection and removal of anyy and all overhead service wires and associated facilities supplying utility service to said property; or C. Every person owning, operating, leasing, occupying or renting a building or structure within a district shall construct and provide that portion of the service connection on his property between the facilities referred to in Section 13.08.100 and the termination facility on or within said building or any person within the time provided for in the resolution enacted pursuant to Section 13.08.040, the city engineer shall give notice in writing to the person in possession of such premises, and a notice in writing to the owner thereof as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, to provide the required underground facilities within ten days after receipt of such notice. D. The notice to provide the required underground facilities may be given either by personal service or by mail. In case of service by mail on either of such persons, the notice must be deposited in the United States mail in a sealed envelope with postage prepaid, addressed to the person in possession of such premises at such premises, and the notice must be addressed to the owner thereof as such owner's name appears, and must be addressed to such owner's last known address as the same appears on the last equalized assessment roll, and when no address appears, to general delivery, City of . If notice is given by mail, such notice shall be deemed to have been received by the person to whom it has been sent within forty-eight (48) hours after the mailing thereof. If notice is given by mail to either the owner or occupant of such premises, the city engineer shall, within forty-eight (48) hours after the mailing thereof, cause a copy thereof, printed on a card not less than eight Inches by ten inches in size, to be posted in a conspicuous place on said premises. E. The notice given by the city engineer to provide the required underground facilities shall particularly specify what work is required to be done, and shall state that if said work is not completed within thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice, the city engineer will provide such required underground facilities, in which case the cost and expense thereof will be assessed against the property benefited and become a lien upon such property. F. If upon the expiration of the thirty (30) day period, the said required underground facilities have not been provided, the city engineer shall forthwith proceed to do the work; provided however, if such premises are unoccupied and no electric or communications services are being furnished thereto, the city engineer shall in lieu of providing the required underground facilities, have the authority to order the disconnection and removal of any and all overhead service wires and associated facilities supplying utility service to said property. Upon completion of the work by the city engineer, he shall file a written report with • • the city council setting forth the fact that the required underground facilities have been provided and the cost thereof, together with a legal description of the property against which such cost is to be assessed. The council shall thereupon fix a time and place for hearing protests against the assessment of the cost of such work upon such premises, which said time shall not be less than ten days thereafter. G. The city engineer shall forthwith, upon the time for hearing such protests having been fixed, give a notice in writing to the person in possession of such premises, and a notice in writing thereof to the owner thereof, in the manner hereinabove provided for the giving of the notice to provide the required underground facilities, of the time and place that the council will pass upon such report and will hear protests against such assessment. Such notice shall also set forth the amount of the proposed assessment. H. Upon the date and hour set for the hearing of protests, the council shall hear and consider the report and all protests, if there be any, and then proceed to affirm, modify or reject the assessment. I. If any assessment is not paid within five days after its confirmation by the council, the amount of the assessment shall become a lien upon the property against which the assessment is made by the city engineer, and the city engineer, is directed to turn over to the assessor and tax collector a notice of lien on each of said properties on which the assessment has not been paid, and said assessor and tax collector shall add the amount of said assessment to the next regular bill for taxes levied against the premises upon which said assessment was not paid. Said assessment shall be due and payable at the same time as said property taxes are due and payable, and if not paid when due and payable, shall bear Interest at the rate of six percent per annum. (Prior code § 29-24) • March 29, 2006 City Council Meeting April 11, 2006 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 06-1264 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-3) TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1255 PROSPECT AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 31, HERMOSA HEIGHTS TRACT, BEING LOT 14, BLOCK 84 AND PART OF LOT 7, BLOCK 88 OF SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Submitted for waiver of full reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 06-1264, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of March 28, 2006, the ordinance was presented to the City Council for consideration and was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Edgerton, Keegan, Reviczky, Mayor Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Noted: Stephen R. = r "', ity :pager Elaine Doerfling, City Cie 1 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 06-1264 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, - AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C- 3) TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1255 PROSPECT AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 31, HERMOSA HEIGHTS TRACT, BEING LOT 14, BLOCK 84 AND PART OF LOT 7, BLOCK 88 OF SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. An application was filed by Brian Carlucci, owner of real property at 1255 Prospect Avenue, seeking to amend the Zoning Map for the subject property. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application to amend the Zoning Map on October 18, 2005, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission, and based on this evidence the Planning Commission denied the requested Zone Change. SECTION 3. On October 25, 2005, the City Council, pursuant to Section 2.52.040, initiated review and reconsideration of the decision of the Planning Commission. SECTION 4. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to reconsider and review the decision of the Planning Commission on the application for a Zone Change on February 28, 2006, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, and the record of decision of the Planning Commission, was presented to and considered by the City Council. SECTION 5. Based on evidence received at the public hearing and the record of decision of the Planning Commission, the City Council makes the following factual findings: 1. The requested change to R-1 will make the zoning for the subject property consistent with the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential. 2. Surrounding properties to the north and west are designated Low Density residential on the General Plan and Zoned R-1, with the exception of adjacent properties immediately to the south which are not included in this request, which would remain C-3 zoned. 1 06-1264 2 3 4 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 6. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings pertaining to the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change: 1. The Zone Change will bring the subject property into consistency with the General Plan for the City pursuant to the specific recommendation for this property in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and will allow the development of an appropriate residential land use consistent with surrounding properties. 2. The subject property to be redesignated is appropriate for residential use as it is abutted by residential uses to the west and north, and located in an area that is predominantly residential in character. A residential use of the subject properties will be more compatible to surrounding residential uses than a potentially more intensive commercial use. The residential use of the property will provide property tax benefits and will not unduly strain city services. 3. The City Council concurs with the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, based on its Environmental Assessment/Initial Study, that this project will result in no significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a Negative Declaration. SECTION 7. Based on the foregoing, and in order to make the Zoning Map consistent with the General Plan Map pursuant to State Law, the City Council hereby amends the City's Official Zoning Map as follows: 1. Amend the Zoning Map by changing the property, as described below and shown on the attached map, from General Commercial (C-3) to Single -Family Residential (R-1): 1255 Prospect Avenue, legally described as Lot 31, Hermosa Heights Tract, being Lot 14, Block 84, and part of Lot 7, Block 88 of the Second Addition to Hermosa Beach. SECTION 8. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 9. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach in the manner provided by law. SECTION 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the 2 06-1264 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 11th of April 2006 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney 3 06-1264 CONTINTUED FROM MARCH 14, 2006 MEETING April 4, 2006 4///h6 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 11, 2006 SUBJECT: LOT MERGER — REQUEST FOR HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE PROPERTY AT 726 PROSPECT AVENUE, COMPRISED OF TWO LOTS, SHALL BE MERGED INTO ONE PARCEL Planning Commission Recommendation: To release the subject lots from the merger requirement, allowing development of the two lots. Background . The subject property is comprised of two lots from the original subdivision (Lots 3 and 4, Block 140 Redondo Villa Tract). The lots are 25 -feet in width and vary from 2,944 to 3,056 square feet. In 1947 the property was developed with a single-family dwelling and in 1950 a garage apartment was added. On January 17, 2006 the Planning Commission considered whether the two lots should be merged, pursuant to Chapter 16.20 of the Municipal Code. The City may consider merging lots if all of the following requirements are satisfied: A. The main structure is partially sited on the contiguous parcel and not more than eighty (80) percent of the lots on the same block of the affected parcel have been split and developed separately. B. With respect to any affected parcel, one or more of the following conditions exists: 1. Comprises less than four thousand (4,000) square feet in area at the time of the determination of merger; 2. Was not created in compliance with applicable laws and ordinances in effect at the time of its creation; 3. Does not meet current standards for sewage disposal and domestic water supply; 4. Does not meet slope stability standards; 5. Has no legal access which is adequate for vehicular and safety equipment access and maneuverability; 6. Its development would create health or safety hazards; 7. Is inconsistent with the applicable general plan and any applicable specific plan, other than minimum lot size or density standards. C. The requirements in subsection B of this section shall not be applicable if any of the conditions in Section 66451.11(b)(A) through (E) of the California Government Code exist. D. If the merger of parcels results in the creation of a parcel that is at least eight thousand (8,000) square feet in size, the planning commission and/or city council may, with the consent of the property owner, redivide the parcel into separate parcels that are at least four thousand (4,000) square feet in size. (Prior code § 29.5-21) 5a • • Staff referred the property to Commission because it was deemed to meet the merger criteria as each of the two contiguous lots contains less than 4,000 square feet and the existing main structure is sited on the two contiguous lots. Also, if the subject property is included in the calculation to determine whether 80 percent of the lots on the block have already been split, then the property falls within the above criteria for consideration of lot merger. (Since only one of the three lots on the block under consideration have already been "split" into 25 -foot wide lots, this calculates as 33%, so "not more than 80% have been split and developed separately.") Therefore, pursuant to Section 16.20.050, the City proceeded with lot merger notification to the property owner and recorded a notice of intent to merge lots with the L.A. County Recorder. Citywide Lot Merger Program The lot merger ordinance was adopted in 1986 and was implemented from 1987 through 1989 under a citywide lot merger program. All properties eligible for merger were identified and staff began the notification process for affected property owners. The Planning Commission took final action to merge the lots and notices were recorded on the affected properties. If a hearing was requested by the property owner the Planning Commission conducted the hearing, and either confirmed the merger, or in some cases unmerged the lots when evidence demonstrated the proposed merged did not meet the requirements of the ordinance. By 1989 the City merged over one thousand lots into over 500 parcels pursuant to this process, including several on the streets east of Prospect Avenue. Approximately 300 of the parcels merged were 50 -feet wide and contained two 25 -foot wide lots located in the R-1 areas around Prospect Avenue, while the remaining involved remnant sub -standard parcels located throughout the City. The City keeps a record of lots merged and recorded on file pursuant to these provisions. The lots merged on the blocks located east of Prospect Avenue all front on the side streets perpendicular to the block, and none of the lots that front on Prospect Avenue were included in the lot mergers. City records do not indicate why these lots were not merged or if they were simply deemed to be . developable. At the conclusion of the program staff stopped referring properties to Commission for merger as all lots that were considered candidates for merger were merged and any lots not merged were considered developable. Analysis The purpose of the present agenda item is to determine whether the City Council should uphold the Planning Commission decision that the subject lots should not be merged. The Commission determined that the property should not be merged because the prevailing condition along Prospect Avenue is 25 -foot wide lots. This issue came to light last year when the City Attorney advised that since the original merger law was never repealed, it was still in effect and any lots that appeared to qualify for merger should be referred to Commission. The applicant has requested a hearing to be given the opportunity to present evidence that the lots do not meet the requirements for merger and correctly indicates in the attached correspondence that he has processed plans for development of two lots. Unfortunately, the owner's plan submittal preceded the City Attorney's opinion on the matter. Prior to that opinion and for the last 17 years staff had not been referring lots for merger consideration because the Commission and City Council's decisions resulting from the citywide program in the 1980's was considered the final disposition for lot mergers in the City. With respect to referral of the matter for lot merger consideration, staff determined that the lots are consistent with the rule that requires that "not more than .80% of the lots on the same block of the affected parcel have been split and developed separately." However, this rule is difficult to interpret for blocks that do not contain a uniform pattern and is basically intended to relieve the requirement for merger on blocks that already have an established character of split lots. In this case, staff made this initial determination based on the specific definition of what constitutes a block for lot merger determination, as contained in the Zoning Ordinance, which defines block as: "all lots facing a common street on both sides of said street, except where residential zoned lot do not exist, or are not within city limits, and said lots are between intersecting streets....". Prospect Avenue between 7th and 8th Street only consist of three lots, the subject parcel and one 25 - foot wide lot on the south side, and a 50 -foot lot on the north of the subject lot. Staff assumed that "facing a common street," means those lots that front on Prospect Avenue. (Please see attached photos). Since only one of these three lots (at 720 Prospect Avenue) have been "split" into 25 -foot wide lots, this calculates as one out of three lots, or 33%. In making this calculation staff assumed that the subject property is included in the calculation. The difficulty with the 80% rule is that it is not clear whether the affected lot or the north corner lot should be included (since it contains an unusual condition .of having a recorded P.U.D. and tract for two units, and its status as a split lot is being disputed by the owner). If the subject parcel is not included 50% of the other lots have been split, if neither the affected lots or the lot at the corner are included, and only the 25 -foot lot is included, it can be.argued that 100% of the other lots have been split. Further, when the area for consideration includes so few lots, the definition of block and the required calculation seems inappropriate because the intent of the merger ordinance to create consistency with the development pattern and neighborhood character of the area. Therefore, it is useful to look beyond the small block in which the subject lots are located to make a determination and the following pertains: 1. Between 3rd Street and l0a' Street there are now 28 parcels comprised of original 25 -foot wide lots, that are either split or combined lots from the original subdivision, that front on Prospect Avenue within the R-1 zone as shown on the attached exhibit. (The only lots that front on Prospect Avenue on its west side, are in the R -2B Zone). Twenty two (22) of these 28 parcels have already been "split" as 25 -foot wide lots, which calculates to be 78%. (This calculation includes the three lots at 838 Prospect that have been split and will be developed separately in the near future). 2. Ten (10) of these 22 parcels that have been "split" or that will soon be split have been developed or split since 1995. The seven developed new homes are located between Massey Avenue and Hollowell Avenue (4 homes at 320-326 Prospect Avenue built in 2002—three 25 -foot wide lots and one 35 -feet wide) and 3 homes at 510-522 Prospect Avenue (built in 1998). In conclusion, the Commission and City Council have the authority to merge the lots into one 6,000 square foot parcel but are not compelled to do so. While staffhas found the lots to meet the criteria of Section 16.20.020 and 16.20.030, the subject block only meets the 80% rule because of the small number of lots in the block. Also, in looking beyond the limits of the subject block, at past lot splits and the general character of the lots that do front on Prospect Avenue, the development of this property • • with two homes on 25 -foot wide lots is not be out of character with the established pattern of development along Prospect Avenue (as 78% of the parcels between 3rd Street and 10th Street have been split into similar narrow lots). Therefore, because of the development pattern in the area and ambiguity of the merger ordinance, and recent lot splits in this area including one at 838 Prospect Avenue, the Commission believes that merging the subject property does not meet the intent of the lot merger ordinance, and recommends releasing the lots from the merger requirement CONCUR: Sol Blumenf: Id, 1 irector Community 1 evelopment Department Steph4 : urre City Manager .4.<4!". ri son Senior Planner Attachments 1. Exhibit showing Prospect Avenue Lots 2. Location Map, and Area Zoning Map 3. City Attorney response (re: lot merger at 555 21s1 St.) 4. Applicant letter requesting hearing P:/ProspectCCrept LOTS FACING PROSPECT AVENUE BETWEEN 3RD S 1OT11 STREETS 838 Prospect Ave Approved as 3 Lots 726 Prospect Ave Subject Property Lrots that front on Prospect (comprised of 25 -foot wide lots from original tracts) • Lot."spl}t" into 25 -foot wide Iots (YMaps - 726 Prospect Avenue 726 Prospect Avenue Page 1 of 1 ttn•//xvmanc/servlet/rnm ecri Pcriman Fcriman9ServinpName=%TermncaReanh f1VRrr1;PntVarcinn= d fl namsi1nn4 III •••••••- - • • • - • cc- • • REDONDO VILLA TRACT M. B. 10 - 90 - 91 - • • • 11 DEC 28 2005 COM. DEV. DEP f Charles H. Heldman P.O. Box -903 Hermosa Beach Ca 90254 Sol Blumenfield, Director Community Development Department City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach Ca 90254 Dear Sol; December 28, 2005 After discussing with you the purposed merger of two lots located at 726 & 728 Prospect Ave. in Hermosa Beach and receiving your letter (Attached) dated December 15, 2005 I'm requesting a formal hearing with the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission. My concerns are that I purchased the property based on two visits to your department. During those visits I discussed the ability to develop two dwellings at that location. On both occasions your department confirmed that the lots were not merged and that I could in fact build two homes. Going on that information I purchased the property, the value of the property is much less than I paid if they are merged. Further, I hired an architect to generate and engineer two sets of plans based on information from your department and have paid for them. The City has reviewed them several times and have made correction to them. Now that the process is done and they are ready to be permitted the city wants to merge the lots. I'm looking for the city to be fair regarding this issue, consider the path I've been led down fo . mast a year and the loss of my personal time and money. • JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP A LAW PARTNERSHIP MEMORANDUM TO: MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: MICHAEL JENKINS, CrIY ATTORNEY DATE: AUGUST 10, 2005 RE: INVOLUNTARY MERGER This memorandum responds to questions raised during your meeting of July 19, 2005 concerning the lot merger determination for 55o 21st Street. 1. Section 16.20.030 allows for merger of "two or more contiguous parcels" under specified circumstances. Hence, two alternatives are available to the Commission: (a) merger of the easterly -most nonconforming lot (portion of lot 38) with the immediately adjacent lot (lot 37), resulting in three lots, and leaving lots 35 and 36 as is; or (b) merger of all four lots into a single lot. The first alternative is mechanically less complicated; the nonconforming lot 38 may be merged with lot 37, and a subsequent over-the-counter lot line adjustment may be requested by the property owner to adjust the remaining lot lines in any manner requested, as long as the three resulting lots are conforming. You have asked whether, in the second of the two alternatives, a parcel map must be filed and processed to re -subdivide the new parcel. Subsection (D) of Section 16.20.030 seems to contemplate a less formal procedure for re - subdividing the merged lot than processing a new parcel map, so as not to place that burden on a property owner whose lots have been involuntarily merged. This subsection suggests that with the consent of the property owner, the merger/re-subdivision process may be integrated in a single process, but is silent as to the mechanics of the process. The difficulty with subsection (D), however, is that there is no mechanism in the subdivision ordinance or in the Map Act, short of a parcel map, for subdividing a parcel once it has been formally created. Once the four I • parcels are merged into one, and a notice of merger is recorded as required by Section 16.20.070, no mechanism short of a parcel map would suffice to subdivide the new lot. Hence, if subsection (D) contemplates a "shortcut," this shortcut would, in effect, be precisely the same as the first alternative discussed above; in other words, the Commission would not formally create a single lot from the existing four, but instead would simply merge lots 38 and 37, and leave to the property owner the decision whether to obtain a lot line adjustment. Finally, it is my opinion that the Commission may select either of the two alternatives. If the Commission believes that the City's land use policies and objectives would be advanced by merging the four existing lots into one and, in effect, requiring subsequent submission and processing of a parcel map to the lot, it may do so. 2. You next ask whether the merger is permissive or mandatory. Section 16.20.030 is written in permissive terms ("two or more parcels . . . may be merged). Section 16.20.080 contemplates that parcels may not be merged, presumably even if they qualify for merger. Section 16.20.090 repeatedly uses the phrase "[i]f the planning commission makes a determination of merger," suggesting that the decision is permissive. Read as a whole, the language in Chapter 16.20 suggests that the decision is permissive, and that the Commission may consider all relevant factors in determining whether merger in a particular case advances the City's land use policies and objectives. The language of Section 16.20.120 no doubt creates confusion. It expressly precludes the separate sale of contiguous lots with an existing structure straddling property lines. Its purpose, however is not clear: whether to require merger by forbidding separate sale of a nonconforming lot held under the same ownership as the adjoining lot, or merely as a device to prevent property owners from circumventing the merger process until that process has been completed, one way or the other. Further, it does not appear on its face to be limited to situations where one or more of the lots are nonconforming; yet, if none of the contiguous lots are nonconforming, there is no reason to preclude separate sale of the lots, unless the objective is to assure that lots under common ownership be realigned to conform to the, prevailing lot size in the neighborhood, and not merely to conform to minimum lot size standards. Section 16.20.120 is ambiguous and would benefit from clarification by way of a code amendment. Insofar as it may apply in this instance, I do not believe that the section supersedes the clearly permissive language 2 • 1 elsewhere in Chapter 16.20. Hence, in my view its purpose here is to prevent the property owner from selling contiguous lots until a final determination as to the merger has been made. You have also inquired into the relationship, if any, between the merger provisions and section 17.46.200 in the zoning ordinance. Section 17.46.200 merely establishes that substandard lots are to be considered legal nonconforming if they were legal lots of record as of the effective date of the ordinance. The fact that these lots may be legal nonconforming does not immunize them from the potential for merger if the criteria of Chapter 16.20 are satisfied. Similarly, section 17.46.210 essentially provides that no lot can be separated in ownership or otherwise split into four or fewer parcels unless a lot split is properly accomplished in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 17.46 and the subdivision ordinance. 3. During the public hearing, counsel for the property owner argued that the City is "estopped" from merging the parcels in question. While I am not aware of the asserted basis for that contention, I can tell you it is well recognized that the doctrine of estoppel will only be applied against the government in the most unusual of cases. Pettit v. City of Fresno (1973) 34 Cal.App.3d 813, 819. It is also well established that an estoppel will not be applied against the government if to do so would effectively nullify a strong rule of policy (such as that established by a zoning law) adopted for the benefit of the public. Id. at 819-820. Here, the merger provisions are creatures of both State and local law and they exist to promote public policy concerns that have been recognized by both the State Legislature and the City Council. Under these circumstances, there is little chance of the City being estopped from taking any action authorized by the merger provisions. I hope that the foregoing answers your questions. Gregg Kovacevich of this office will be present at your meeting on August 16, 2005 in order to answer any further questions you may have and to assist your deliberations in this matter. April 5., 2006 RECEiVED APR 05 2066 COM. DEV. DEP r. Mr. Peter Tucker, Mayor Mr. Sam Edgerton, Mayor Pro Tempore Mr. Michael Keegan, Council Member Mr. J.R. Reviczky, Council Member CIO City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 CITY COUNCIL APPEAL OF THE JANUARY 17, 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING L-10 DECISION TO RELEASE THE TWO LOTS AT 726 PROSPECT AVENUE FROM THE LOT MERGER REQUIREMENT, THEREBY ALLOWING THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO SEPARATE PARCELS BY CHUCK HEIDMAN In December of 2004, my wife Doris and l purchased a newly constructed home at 1126 8«' Street in the City of Hermosa Beach from a Mr. Chuck Heidman, the same developer of the above -referenced subject property (as well as, according to him at the time, other properties in both Redondo and Manhattan Beach); coincidently, this same subject property also borders a substantial portion of our westerly property line. Prior to our decision to relocate to Hermosa Beach, we spent a considerable amount of time investigating existing residential density levels and discussing the relative effects of same upon neighborhood quality of life with both realtors and residents of the South Bay area in general, and, in particular, within the cities of Hermosa, Manhattan, and Redondo Beach (the latter being frequently referred to as "Recondo" Beach by many with whom we spoke). In the course of these conversations we were informed by several realtors and residents alike that Hermosa Beach had previously enacted a lot merger ordinance discouraging the very type of overdevelopment (generally defined as replacing one home with two or more single or multi -family dwellings) that we were most concerned about; upon verifying the existence of this ordinance and the completion of the resulting lot merger program with the City's Community Development Department, we narrowed our search down to Hermosa Beach and ultimately established residence here as previously indicated. 1 of 8 Subsequent to becoming residents of our City, in early January of this year we were informed by a concerned neighbor that the one existing home and detached guest quarters situated on the subject property was about to be demolished and developed as two separate parcels with a single-family dwelling on each, as well as that the Planning Commission had also recently rendered a similar decision not to merge the three existing lots at 838 Prospect Avenue (just one block to the north of the subject property) at its regular meeting of December 7, 2005, thereby effectively clearing the way for the developer of that property to replace the one currently existing home with three single-family dwellings. Upon confirming that a hearing in the case of 726 Prospect Avenue was, indeed, on the Planning Commission's agenda for its regular meeting of January 17, 2006 (as well as that Mr. Heldman was, in fact, not only the owner of the subject property, but also of the adjacent properties to the immediate north and south of it at 1120 8th Street and 720 Prospect Avenue, respectively), we elected to circulate a petition in opposition to the Community Development Department's staff recommendation to release the subject lots from the merger requirement, allowing the development of the two existing lots (for which the department had already erroneously accepted, reviewed, and made corrections to building plans for two single-family dwellings submitted by the developer, thereby creating a potential financial liability to the City in the event of an alternative Planning Commission decision to merge the property into one parcel). In the process of personally circulating our petition door-to-door and no more than approximately one block away from the subject property in any given direction, we collected (in under four hours on a holiday weekend when many residents were away from home) a total of 76 signatures in support of our opposition to staffs recommendation; furthermore, it is important to note that not one of the residents we solicited signatures from declined to sign the petition. Finally, it is most important to note that, at least based upon the comments of these signers, they are vehemently opposed to the proposed development of the subject property or similar overdevelopment of any other properties that remain unmerged after the lot merger program of 1987 through 1990 but still meeting .the intent and criteria of the lot merger ordinance as adopted into the City's Municipal Code in 1986. On January 17, 2006, we submitted our signed petition to the Community Development Department for consideration and attended (along with many of the other signers) the regular meeting of the Planning Commission. During the public comment period of the hearing itself, eight of the signers and a recused planning commissioner spoke in support of the petition, as well; only the developer and his personal injury attorney Albro L. Lundy 111 of Baker, Burton, & Lundy spoke in favor of staff's recommendation to not merge the lots and develop the subject property as two separate parcels. Nonetheless, the planning 2 of 8 • • commissioners (with the notable exception of Commissioner Pizer (noe) and Commissioner Kersenboom (absent) voted to approve staffs recommendation not to merge the two lots of the subject property. Upon further consultation with the signers of our petition, we filed official notice of our intent to appeal with the deputy city clerk on January 26, 2006. Since that time, we have conducted extensive further discussions not only with the signers of our original petition but with many more neighborhood residents and/or property owners of the City, as well, all of whom also vehemently oppose the Planning Commission's decision in this matter. In reviewing the Community Development Department's original staff recommendation of January 9, 2006 as presented to the Planning Commission and upon which this decision was subsequently rendered, we submit the following for further consideration by the City Council at this time (each of the following sections correspond to staffs recommendation format for Council's reference; excerpts from it appear in italics): Background "Staff determined the subject property meets the above criteria for Commission consideration as each one of the contiguous lots contains less than 4,000 square feet and the existing structure is sited on the two contiguous lots. Also, since only one of the three lots on the block under consideration have already been `split' into 25 -foot wide lots, this calculates as 33%, so `not more than 80% have been split and developed separately.' Therefore, pursuant to Section 16.20.050, the City mailed a Notice of Intention to Determine Status to the property owner on [December 151, 2005, and the Notice of Intention was recorded with the L.A. County Recorder." This excerpt clearly states that, according to staff, the subject property is, indeed, subject to merger. "The lot merger program operating between 1987 and 1990 established a mandatory review of substandard lots on a citywide basis consistent with the requirements of the lot merger ordinance. Based upon the assumption that the lot merger program had addressed all substandard lots, staff has accepted plans for constructing two homes on the property. However, since staff accepted these plans, the City Attorney has advised that any lots that meet the merger criteria that were not merged from 1987 to 1990 should still be considered for merger when a parcel meets the merger criteria." This excerpt states that staffs assumption was, in fact, incorrect in this case (and obviously presents the possibility that other such errors based upon this same incorrect assumption may have already occurred in the past or could 3 of 8 • • occur again in the future unless immediate corrective action is taken); the City attorney correctly advises that the subject property must now be considered under the merger ordinance. Accordingly, we request that the City Council direct staff to immediately audit the lot merger program in order to identify any and all remaining unmerged lots subject to the original intent and criteria of the lot merger ordinance, and reinstate the lot merger program as required to merge them now. In the meantime, all applications for building permits for new residential construction should be reviewed upon submission to insure that staff does not again accept plans for any such parcels that may still be subject to merger as it did in the case of the subject property. "The Planning Commission recently considered a similar case for merger of three contiguous lots at 838 Prospect Avenue, and the Commission decided not to merge the lots." Regarding the case of 838 Prospect Avenue, during the Planning Commission meeting of January 17, 2006, one of the commissioners expressed his concem that residents and/or property owners did not appear to oppose the commission's decision not merge the lots contained in this parcel just one month earlier. However, had he been at all familiar with the language of the Lot Merger Ordinance upon which he was about to render a decision, he would surely have been aware of the fact that there is no provision to publicly notify residents and/or property owners of a Planning Commission hearing and possible decision not to merge lots as there would be in the case of a zone change, even though it presents the very same potential implication with respect to increasing current neighborhood residential density levels. Accordingly, we request that the City Council direct staff to require public notice of all future Planning Commission lot merger requests for hearing to all residents and/or property owners within a 300 -foot radius of any and all remaining unmerged lots subject to the original intent and criteria of the Lot Merger Ordinance and Program as is presently required in the case in a zone change hearing. Such action on the part of Council now will serve to more fully protect the inherent property rights of all owners potentially affected by such a hearing and decision instead of just the developer as is presently the case under this particular municipal ordinance. "In a prior communication regarding compulsory mergerof lots under Chapter 16.20, the City Attomey indicated that the commission is not compelled to merge the lots but consider ,the merger based upon the evidence related to the ordinance and neighborhood compatibility." This excerpt elicits the question of when and why the City Attorney was consulted in this matter. According to the memorandum included in staff's recommendation, it was,, in fact, August 10, 2005 regarding the matter of yet another lot merger determination at 550 21st Street (a portion of which was 4 of 8 • • subsequently merged); apparently, once again, as a direct result of the incomplete lot merger program. In concluding his memorandum of the same date to the Planning Commission, he advises regarding the property owner's argument that the City is estopped from merging the parcels in question: "...here, the merger provisions are creatures of both State and local law and they exist to promote public policy concerns that have been recognized by both the State Legislature and the City Council. Under these circumstances, there is little chance of the City being estopped from taking any action authorized by the merger provisions." This excerpt clearly states that, according to established legal precedent, it is highly unlikely that a property owner can argue estoppel in the case of a lot merger, either during or after the original lot merger program. As such, without question the City legally retains its right to reinstate and complete the lot merger program as previously requested. Lot Merger Ordinance Background "Chapter 16.20 establishing the process for merging sub -standard lots was adopted into the Municipal Code in 1986. The ordinance was adopted in response to State Legislation of 1984, which completely overhauled the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act with respect to merging contiguous parcels under common ownership. The City determined that it was in the public interest to preserve the character of existing neighborhoods, and the concern was largely in response to a recent trend in the development of 50 -foot wide parcels into two 25 -foot wide parcels with a home on each lot. The lots were concentrated in areas east of Prospect Avenue..." This excerpt clearly states that, once again, the intent of the ordinance was "to preserve the character of existing neighborhoods" and "in response to a recent trend in the development of 50 -foot wide parcels into two 25 -foot wide parcels with a home on each lot," as well as that "the lots were concentrated in areas east of Prospect Avenue." Accordingly, due to the location of the subject property on the east side of Prospect Avenue (as well as within a physical block where over 40 lots of various widths including many of 25 feet were previously merged under the original lot merger program) and its two lot widths of 25 feet each, we request that the City Council overturn the Planning Commission hearing decision "to release the subject lots from the merger requirement, allowing the development of the two existing lots," and, instead, exercise staff's alternative recommendation "to merge the property into one parcel" in accordance with the original intent and criteria of the Lot Merger Ordinance and Program. `By 1989 the City merged approximately 1100 lots into 500+ parcels pursuant to these provisions, including several on the streets east of Prospect Avenue. 5 of 8 • • Approximately 300 of the parcels merged were 50 -foot wide parcels that contained two 25 -foot wide lots located in the R-1 areas around Prospect Avenue noted above, while the remaining involved the combining of remnant sub- standard parcels located throughout the city. The City keeps a record of lots merged and recorded pursuant to these provisions, both on file and referenced in City parcel maps. The lots merged on the blocks east of Prospect Avenue are all lots that front on the side streets perpendicular to Prospect Avenue, and none of the lots that front on Prospect Avenue were included in the lot mergers. It is not clear why these lots were not merged at the time." This excerpt clearly states that "several" lots east of Prospect Avenue were merged into single parcels; however, based upon staffs explanation of the lot merger symbol drawn on the City parcel maps also referenced, approximately 100 lots are actually marked as merged between 7th and 10th Streets alone. Furthermore, it also makes it clear that the records required to audit the lot merger program as previously requested have existed since the assumed completion of the original program in 1989. Finally, there appears to be no record of why eligible lots fronting Prospect Avenue were not merged under the original Lot Merger Program, again inferring that the program itself never was, in fact, completed as previously assumed by staff. Analysis "The applicant has requested a hearing, pursuant to Section 16.20.060, to be given the opportunity to present evidence that the lots do not meet the requirement for merger. The applicant has submitted his request for hearing (attached) correctly noting that his project plans for the two new homes are ready to be permitted, though he has not provided any specific evidence that the property does not meet the requirements for merger." This excerpt clearly states that the developer "...has not provided any specific evidence that the property does not meet the requirements for merger." Neither, it should be noted, has staff up to this point in their recommendation; however, for unknown reasons in the following excerpts, staff proceeds to attempt to provide such evidence on the developer's behalf in the remaining portion of this section. 1. Regarding the "difficulty with the 80% rule" (clearly defined within the ordinance itself to be that "the main structure is partially sited on the contiguous parcel and not more than 80% of the lots on the same block of the affected parcel have been split or developed separately" = period), staff proceeds to speculate that, somehow, "it is not clear whether..." ... the affected lot..." (previously referred to as the "subject property' 6 of 8 • • b. "...or the lot at the north comer..." (also owned by this same developer and previously referred to as 1120 8th Street) "...should be included (since it contains an unusual condition of having a recorded P.U.D and tract for two units, and which may be in dispute as to whether it has been `split.'" (despite the fact that, according to the October 18, 2005 minutes of the planning commission meeting regarding this property "...the City Attorney has given a preliminary indication to staff that the map is no longer in effect and, therefore, its not possible to make the proposed lot line adjustment.') ...should be included in the calculation, and furthermore, that "if the subject parcel is not included, 50% of the other lots have been split; if neither the affected lot or the lot at the comer are included, and only the 25 -foot lot is included, it can be argued that 100% of the other lots have been split." While we acknowledge staffs creativity along this line, it is clear that it is, nonetheless, in direct conflict not only with the original intent and criteria of the ordinance, but specifically with this particular rule as previously defined by staff. 2. Concerning whether or not it is actually "helpful to look beyond the subject block...between 3'1 Street and 90th Street" to "determine whether merging these lots is the appropriate decision" to meet "the intent of the merger ordinance, which is to maintain neighborhood character," we instead propose to the City Council our own "alternative recommendation" of simply observing: a. The east side of Prospect Avenue in the subject property block, where three homes are presently situated (and, where, if the developer has his way with the subject property, there will soon be four; if he prevails in the matter of 1120 8th Street as well, there will eventually be a total of five) b. The west side of Prospect Avenue between 8th Street and 8th Place in the subject block, where two homes are presently situated c. The east side of Prospect Avenue between 8th and 9th Street, where four homes are presently situated (and where, at 838 Prospect Avenue, staff used its own recent recommendation and resulting Planning Commission hearing decision not to merge three eligible lots in order to further justify its recommendation not to merge the lots in the case of the subject property; as such, the developer of that property has already submitted plans to demolish one home and replace it with three single-family dwellings, thereby increasing residential density to six dwellings on this side of the block alone -- a full 50% increase over the current neighborhood residential density level) 7 of 8 d. The west side of Prospect Avenue between 8th Place and 9th Street, where two homes are presently situated e. The west side of Prospect Avenue between 9th and 10th Street, where two homes are presently situated f. The attached photographs which clearly and accurately depict the true "character of" our "existing neighborhood" along Prospect Avenue, as opposed to staff's evaluation of neighborhoods further north and south in order to justify its recommendation not to merge the subject Tots In summation, the City Council's actions in this matter will be, according to the Community Development Director, "final," so serious consideration is required for each and every request that we have submitted for you to vote upon. Both your individual and corporate decisions will most certainly be viewed not only by our community but by surrounding communities, as well as a clear mandate of the future direction of our City with respect to overdevelopment. As such, we implore you to proceed very carefully with that future. Sincerely, E . Gregor E. Eberhardt Doris O.L. Eberhardt gee Attachment cc Petition Signers 8 of 8 • .K::ta ..;; P :fT i Ai. . ;, m N ady� r,h�rr r • • M% _.... , ..... ... .. .:."7:e:P;.1:::"L. -.."-e,Mii.01*,'• •-.,..7...-,. ,:-..-...,• -.---7-..-4-'•wlmeall•b&I,44.-tf••=:,:.,u,.:41(•• 4 7:e.1-• 4fe" •••• .4P&•-:.•••,.. , . ,••• , - ., •••••••• ••,,,...k..,,,,...„..„4-,,,,,,,,,_.„.„0.,.....-„,..„4,- •••<,•,........-,,,,:;.•:_f,„:3,••....:..: ,,,..;::„.•...,... -. • •: .•:' ...'"••••••,..•,--'•:-4-,T---'--•,`',:41-ire. . ....... .. . , ••,,,-;,, r2)--,,.11 •••—•,,.. , ....zt:. •:..-..,...,,•-• . : I.,0,,,• .. --4.,;54.4 , ;,- •,... t>.i'x':gt,,,•• "S.I--:;;'''''=••4#* q• • RECEIVED APR 1 0 2006 City Clerk: Please Deliver This POINT OF ORDER Per. as a Supplemental regarding Agenda and other noticing of Public Hearing Item 5.a of the Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting of April 11, 2006, and make a copy available to the Public, and Press at the meeting. To: The Hermosa Beach City Council City Manager, City Clerk, Director of Community Development, City Attorney City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, Ca 90254 From: Howard Longacre, Hermosa Beach Resident. Honorable Members of the City Council, city officials, and others. I am herein pointing out my concerns with the agenda and other noticing of Item 5.a of the City Council meeting of April 11, 2006. Said Agenda item under section 5, Public Hearings states; 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. a. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO MERGE THE PROPERTY AT 726 PROSPECT AVENUE, COMPRISED OF TWO LOTS, INTO ONE PARCEL. (Continued from meeting of March 14, 2006). Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 2006. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: To release the subject lots from the merger requirement, allowing development of the two lots. To the reader, this posting is completely ambiguous. It both states that the Planning Commission merged the property, and then indicates that the Planning Commission Recommendation was to 'release the subject property from the merger requirement'. Was it both an action to merge, and a recommendation not to merge? What does that mean? SUPPLEMENTAI 1 -The Planning Commission did not merge the property, nor did they make a INFORMATION 'recommendation', but instead they took action to not merge the lots. That action is appealable to the City Council. Without appeal/override by the City Council or other, the Page 1 of 2 H.Longacre Point -Of -Order Re: Pubic Hearing Item #5a HB City Council Agenda 4-11-2006 5a • • "action" would have stood. Those having seen the Planning Commission meeting only on TV would assume this is a done deal to not merge the 2 lots. 2 -While this item may have been, by all concerned, originally scheduled for the March 14 Council agenda, it none the less did not appear on the March 14 Council agenda, and as such there was no action by the Council to 'continue' the item to a date certain. Thus this notice of continuance as mentioned in the agenda posting is unfortunately incorrect as the council has had no prior public discussion of the appeal with respect to an angendized item. 3 -There is no indication in the staff report or this item as to what entity appealed the item. Further there was no Iegal notice printed of the Council's Public Hearing/Appeal, nor even a $5 fluorescent sign posted on the property announcing this important Public Hearing to the neighborhood. An item as important as this matter most certainly is, would best be continued such that proper noticing and agenda wording/posting may be made. The public's right to clearly understand what is taking place with this well recognized property would best proceed any hasty decision one way or the other. There is much confusion presented which can only lead to a legal challenge by whomever feels to be the loser, should this matter proceed to decision on the City Council's Agenda of April 11, 2006. The city attorney might best be consulted as to how to proceed given the interest in this matter, and the odd posting and notices -- or lack thereof made. Sincerely, Howard Longacre Page 2 of 2 H.Longacre Point -Of -Order Re: Pubic Hearing Item #5a HB City Council Agenda 4-11-2006 • RECEIVED APR 1 1 2006 Supplemental testimony 4-11-2006 ITEM 5 -la Per..... City Clerk: Please deliver this supplemental testimony I am submitting this day of the meeting to the City Council members and other officials in attendance at the Public Hearing for Item 5.a of the Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting of April 11, 2006. Please also make a copy available for the public's review, and the press table at the meeting. To: The Hermosa Beach City Council City Manager, City Clerk, Director of Community Development, City Attorney RE: The Appeal of the Planning Commission action which un -merges what is a lot - merged property at 726 Prospect Avenue, Hermosa Beach. 726 Prospect should remain a lot -merged property. Honorable Members of the City Council, city officials, and others. My views and comments here below are to aid in pointing out that the subject property at 726 Prospect is a lot -merged property, having been lot merged after an extensive public hearing process in the late 1980s which I personally witnessed. I have lived as an adult in or near Hermosa Beach since 1959. I came to personally know the longtime owners of this property, Vi and Arnold Isgreen in the late 1980s at the time of the lot-mergings. I talked numerous times with Vi Isgreen in particular, and she along with many others in the area were not at all happy with the fact that their properties were being lot merged. The lot-mergings were being done to stop, among other things, the process of tearing down family homes to build concrete surrounded "row houses", sometimes also referred to by real estate agents as "tall and skinnys" or "railroad box -car houses". The net effect of the lot-mergings has unquestionably been higher values and a better quality of life to all the properties in the area. To now un -merge some property(s) due to "no records", and allow these higher values to revert and be abused by "row -house" builders is very odd to say the least. Something seems very broken. None the less, with respect to 726 Prospect (formerly the Isgreen's property), at the conclusion of all the public hearings in the late 1980s, with many notices mailed to the owners regarding the hearings held in the Planning Commission, and the City Council, there was no doubt in Vi Isgreen's mind that their property had been lot merged as had all such properties on the three sides of her block. Her property was lot merged plain and simple. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 H.Longacre writen testimony Re: Pubic Hearing Item #5a HB City Council Agenda 4-11-2006 5a C« • • I believe that I personally attended more of those lot merger public hearings than just about anyone as I had issues with the city re: fire hydrants and height -reduction which was effecting another property I owned at the time, down near the beach itself. I can recall vividly the rancor, pro and con, and the council chamber being packed on many a night with meetings running well past 11 PM on these lot mergings. The R-1 assessor parcels in the hill section were virtually all merged. I personally have owned and occupied a "row house" for 21 years on a side street 1-1/2 blocks from 726 Prospect. The lots on my street were not lot merged because virtually every house on the street was already a "row house". It is very unfortunate that my street had become as it did prior to my purchase there. "Row houses" are without question something for a city to avoid as I now fully understand how they do degrade a neighborhood in many many many ways over time. They benefit no one but the developers and real estate agents who represent them. For the most part "row houses" do not bring community. They have a high turnover rate, and significantly ruin what was formerly a nice family neighborhood. Our council of the 1980s understood that and thus implemented the state laws to save our city from the blight of more "row houses". How the city has carried out the details of record keeping seems to be the real question. There is no question in my mind that both 726 Prospect and 838 Prospect were lot merged in the late 1980 lot merger process the city carried out. Those now desiring to place 19 foot wide "row houses", surrounded by concrete on either of those merged lots, are out to milk every last dollar from their properties at the expense of this entire hill section. It is unconscionable, their self-centered poor judgement given how short life is. I feel sorry for them and the negative consequences and impacts their actions will bring to one of the last areas of the city with some sense of residential tradition should the council let this happen. BTW, the sellers/trust of the Isgreen's having received only $1,050,000 last May for the Isgreen property at 726 Prospect, indicates to me they were perhaps very il-served by their selling entity. That landmark property was unquestionably worth far more than that, and never even had a For -Sale sign. The new owner all but banked a tidy profit just by closing escrow from what I can see. Congratulations to him for evidently having the right connection. Sincerely, Howard Longacre Hermosa Beach Resident/Property owner Page 2 of 2 H.Longacre writen testimony Re: Pubic Hearing Item #5a HB City Council Agenda 4-11-2006 Subject: FW: 726 Prospect leter to the Mayor Original Message From: CHUCK & LIEN [mailto:bamby6®adelphia.net] Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 7:45 AM To: City Clerk Subject: 726 Prospect leter to the Mayor April 5, 2006 Charles Heidman 726 Prospect Ave Hermosa Beach Ca 90254 (310) 848-7400 (310) 423-3205 Peter Tucker; Mayor City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive. Hermosa Beach CA 90254 Dear Mayor; I'm writing this letter to introduce myself and to discuss the proposed lot merger of the above mention property. Lien and I have lived in the South Bay for almost thirty years and have raised two children during that time. For the past twenty plus years Lien has maintain and run a business in the city of Hermosa Beach and we have lived in the area for almost fifteen years. Approximately one year ago we were given the opportunity to purchase 726/728 Prospect Avenue. At the time of purchase the prior owner told me that I was purchasing two twenty-five foot residential lots. Prior to entering into escrow I did my due diligence and went to the Hermosa Beach Planning Department to verify that I was in fact purchasing two lots that were not merged; as a matter of fact I visited the Planning Department on two occasions to make sure that I had all the correct information and on both visits it was confirmed that the lots were not merged. After escrow closed I contracted Jan Trobaugh and Associates to design two single-family homes for those lots. Through the coarse of the last year the plans have went back and forth between the Cities Planning Department, Jan Trobaugh and the Engineers and were finally ready for permitting in December 2005. After going through the process of getting two sets of plans ready to be permitted I received a letter from the Planning Commission saying they were considering merging the two lots. On December 28, 2005 I drafted a letter to the Planning Commission requesting a hearing regarding this issue. The hearing date was set for January 17, 2006 and the outcome and recommendation from the Planning Commission was to allow the development of the two lots. SUPPLEMENTAL During the hearing residents from the local area attend and spoke to the INFORMATION commission and requested that they reverse their decision based on the argument of density in the area, wanting no more homes built on twenty-five foot lots, the development of the two lots would change the appearance of the neighborhood and create parking issues. The neighborhood residents have since appealed their concerns to the City Council to be heard on April 11, 5a 1 2006. At the present time there are two residence at 726 Prospect and the tenants park off the street; the two proposed residences will have double car garages and two off street parking spots; the area of the proposed development, as pointed out by the Planning Commission is approximately 70% of homes built on twenty-five foot lots. In my opinion the development of two residences at 726 Prospect will have a positive impact and will in no way change the demographics of the area. I'm asking the City Council to conceder the time, money & energy I've put into the project, be fair and accept the Planning Commissions recommendation to allow the development of the two existing lot. Sincerely; Charles H. Heidman PETITION AGAINST RELEASE FROM LOT MERGER REQUIREMENT 726 PROSPECT AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CHUCK HEIDMAN, APPLICANT RCEIVED HEARING L-10 JANUARY 17, 2006 JAN 1 7 2006 7:00 P.M. COM. DEV. DEP f. We, the undersigned neighborhood residents and/or property owners of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby petition against the release of 726 Prospect Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California from the lot merger requirement in accordance with Sections 16.20.010 through 16.20.100 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Name: Crelor E. EL) Address: 112 g 4-1" S4' ' City: 14 err)+Q sG, Re,a c-11 State: CA Signature: ZIP Code: 9 0 Z S 4 eloik44,21,15 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5a Name: Address:/ City: State: al '�Yrn o5 /?e G i, ZIP Code: 7Oz5/ Signatu Name: 411, Address: /2-e-3 777/5Y. City: f7Z,wl6q.l1/4 State: C Signatur- . ZIP Code: '0(2Z• Name: /. eta "71;14 Address: / Z 7 city: /-/ State: CA ZIP Code: 9 ' 5— Signature: Name: 11/1, r ri cz _ 44C -1)40-Y1 czid Address: /a /D / 574 City: f`-&.- P -ck_ State: }- ZIP Code: dS Signature: Name: ra-)'i- f ,i ase Ivigk ak 1 r � Address: I ZW 111'` 51 -re,, City: hiermo +di State: i_%c Signature: ZIP Code: qr»5q M01ha0g7 Name: 776h riLL-Lri--- Address: 1x9'12 City: \ Ll'iOSA- - lif44Ct-1 State: (:4 ZIP Code: Th?TV Signature: \ jr( -UD ��owJa :ftmo h 0,6 :apo0 dIZ :aJn;eu6iS D •aleIS i :ssaappy :aweN r 1 1av' _v7tO) :apoo dIZ •aan;eu6ls :a1S ,, 117.1, 0-v-61 :ssaappv :aweN • Name: 1/�i� /�pe,c(5e, l Address: ' /(h c "7 tO! clt City: t State: Signature: 1 ZIP Code: Name: &_, /11(c had Zaam,/ Address: /P -a( ) Se -(/04A (S//-/ City: frig ri'lSa .2e-./(-4 State: ( ZIP Code: 96 25T Signature: 5 i` - Signature: Name: Address: City:1-03 State: CA - Signature: ZIP Code: 9402... Name: Address: //1-15- g/ C7 A., /- 1 City: 11erBeach, State: CTt ZIP Code: 9 261/ 1/411 /fr2rn. Signature: Name: • Address: 1 1 1 -�— city:\ \- �f State: C_ - Signature ZIP Code: tooki.he. 1 i1` "s:BRISINAN 1, wail= State/104 ZIP Code: Signature: i �, j ��� J Name: ? r f' . Sko 1 Address; izes • clyik City: h' i3 State: G/� _► t Code: 9'02- 57 Signature:` Name: Man VYCfily Address: 1133 - Si' • City: /V/ t &C State: (J, Signature: ZIP Code: Name: 0/€ ,L c - D.,-„,*te) Address: //c9lp ST' City: eCn o5 rages), CA State: CA • ZIP Code:gO 9 - Signature: Name: A/O U Pile /Jl Address; 1( erYA City: State: Ck A ZIP Code:1 2-5 I 41, Signature: ,AL Name: J°(4M (� Address: 122.1 City: P'j, State: (QA - Signature: r ZIP Code: '9625 G/ Name: 45t''ot .e .u) (e 4-( Address: (2 5S t 5 • City: (-if/ -U State: c-- 11/4 Signature: ZIP Code: e , oLS l Name: Address: 1 a -y s g--tt SL City: Yerv, o S (� eq.c.L, State: � ZIP Code: Signature: Name: Wei) MO (5 Address: 1(o U &11 Sf city: I-\etf}'y105L._ Frarin State: a ZIP Code: Signature: Name: OJ&VW 14//Al$ Address: I 1-30 e s4- . Re/OWL, r,etc/{(1 City: State: U'- ZIP Code: 610ZSt( Signature: City: ' a-', S `"e1.43te--14 State: (07 ZIP Code: Name: Address: 4 ‘oZ 1 V City: titeQ.W‘p$R Ep<.vxr State: 044 - Signature: ZIP Code: 954 Name: IJc,'lel/P c44" ,t€4 �! Address: `(a g $ Ve'-! City: liew Utte5 q e -a. State: Ci A! ZIP Code: TO /Z 5-Y Signature: h Name: Address City: State: Signature: J27 8 57. c� ZIP Code: Name: P(W nut,(2. Address: l (Q ss,,LeAtjt City: H.12/44 Sli Q.Q,qek State: (1&. ZIP Code: 6 2-"( Signature: S4Ack, Name: cdevot(e F. CYotp..e Address: 1 116 geveuft, S- . City: 1 evry1osa 9€acli State: cA- ZIP Code: Cl°2C4 Signature: Geztaap Name: . tout d/l! Address: /fox 7451 City: #eirioh9'7A ""&4 State: e4 Signature: ZIP Code: Name: /1/4/4/Q• , ©zon Address: //4,/-4 it's* c45 i c City: 4,27�c State: a, Signature: ZIP Code: yD�,6-,‘ Name: City: Lio Address: (13 b 1ERP*k State: Signature: ZIP Code: 61Q, %Ai Name: Al+oE �E6ts Address: \,1j ..)T 4 CPer City: State: CA- Of M C ZIP Code: Signature: eta, Name: Address: ?.. ? 51 S'e City:�'-r/ ray State: C,CU• 1111111 r Signature: ZIP Code: Name: wLaa-Q'PiamJn ll Address: 111-k t 9 -m - City: 4 'mak State: C. "' ZIP Code: 1;6 / Signature: r Name: SOM9r 9-444b/VA- Address: City: State: 1141 7'ff• sr, Signature: ZIP Code: (2-4,7-1.0 O2 P Name: Address: •%Z/ 7 7!i 5 City: /-7/.3 State: f' ZIP Code: co ZS -5/ Signature: Name: Address: City: 14,143 0, d-gotcA Name: 'e K AM) . f Address: L t 1. tic SY City: 11f^R ►"t 134.0 State: CA ZIP Code: Ia,�-tib Signature: Name: -,f i 1kt sLL( V7, .. /cli7 lam/ City: /4 a -Q. OA 0 <A - State: ZIP Code: 9)6S2-1-- Signature: I r Address: 7/5"- Yi' C� Name: c'a C MOVIIIVIAO Address: CC�' City: t�vnDStr-- &get C4 State: (Yfi ZIP Code: 9642 Signature: Name: Jo'e t AAO,v Address: City: -71� Mc -1 ge rAltos tia e�.�� C ?o2M State: CID 16'A CA ZIP Code: 261 Signature: Name: 4 I T f t u k D• MO s€ Address: gob" P1405ppC.T 4 i/ city: fi RMC/ B Ei¢c 1f State: CAL f redo - ZIP Code: R 0 2- TIL Signature: 0 9/4,, Name: Address: ' OS" / PLc y City: N,1t2s #9 State: a iv. Signature: /9v9, ZIP Code: 40 zs Name: Address: J OS) 2 S�-�- City: l-a'MCDS A State: C S ZIP Code: 9c),s�J Signature:�� Name: Ter-121Ayips 0N Address: /05 7 ?TN Puic City: keiti os4 6a,a-cK State: ( • Signature: ZIP Code: Poesy Name: 7a1-1 / Address; ?d J' r V, r / f ` -c City: Pek ri p ,4 /l !/1GA State: C4 Signature: ZIP Code: 7Q,2-13' Name: j 1iv‘ . e(\e,,Adt 5A Address: t01-6 et ,t -u1 --i Q L • City: O e `,N16S A `Oc-)v‘ . State: C' ( Signatu ZIP Code: - to Name: M I TCU Dem/4NE Address: l2 Lf 7 '6-& ST• City: /-,L9R MoS4 f3 bZ•- State: CA- ZIP Code: qO zs- Signature: Name: ?yet, 5 , kac,-- Address: :th City: Her rr►,v s9 fie. h State: G4 ZIP Code: 90.2-S'c{ Name: • 4t1RE; Address: [ / (4-S &rU- ,Sr: %S 13C --14<N ZIP Code: Name: 4 -t H#c- i 6-C772) Address: / 2 J SAM. s City: Pi A -/c) $'#; State: C Signature: ZIP Code: .7025"1 Name: Citki ! S 7! lv L. , R 0 4 ! NS OA/ Address: f Z '7 Ca — .' tJ City: 6JI4 l`16 5 t9 3 g RC1 C' 14 State: Signature: ZIP Code: a/61.64:2A,2, pk°*$.-le-IA--tterYO Name: " c Address: \?Aj b (.c7 U 474 --- City: �v•--u S -k lie et, -- State: G A - Signature: ZIP Code: y (>251-( Name: Park. Le.e Address: II -5° $ti, City: 140'4i ci& uz State: C4 Signature: ZIP Code: /76 zc y Name: c.f.... L, J2_ Address: l Z. S ? S~� City: State: ZIP Code: % a W Signature: Name: Tet `�e027 Address: 1/ �� g S-tL City:f.erno5A State: (_A ZIP Code: le -7.0P-5 7` Signature: � Z Name: (, artssce,-) t*hs Address: 140S k City: \exwc&3ccc-) State: opt Signature: ZIP Code: 13 25q Name: Address: City: State: Sign - ture: Name: Leona rat ley Address: 115 2__ sfiel eYe,-- City: 41evmoea J3each State: Ck Signature: • ZIP Code: QQ z 54 - ..-011(N.-- • Name: Address: City: State: Signat _ ZIP -_.- PtO 2$9 AIL - Name:j vr-r 4). LJ Address: / /94 g City: Aierili4ZA. State: Signature: ZIP Code: '.!>Z5--1-( Name: Address: City: State: Laui LVd(v-" k 0(0 Su, C ZIP Code: Signature: !�- Name: \ �,..mczs� NC Address: \N cZ:% City: ZIP Code: c:"\\\\. State: Signature: Name: Address: City: State: ZIP Code: Signature: Name: Address: City: State: ZIP Code: Signature: e Post o*:04•4W can't at the beach m the summer I've,:;tried, o ut atht during the summer week- s odown nigat the pieronly t0 tum around d gohome because there was no parking So what do ;eve do? We build more;park g structures, add more street signs an ghts to, control the traffic spilling throug,_ residential streets Give -handicapped people `'�eir own parking spaces out ori the street tri . u,rt of :their homes. I thou t `most homes ad garages arid °driveways? `)ur city hall a wonderful vision m the' l 1980s when it merged multiple lots rn ler to,preserve=the character. of the exist . neighborhoods VVtiat's happened tct that vision? The parking problems all over- our the overcrowding at our. schools, these roblems will never get better if the. Plan ing Commission doesn't enforce the lot er rordinance busness will almost always niakc • decisions based on profit, not what z the employee$, the customeror the envi ;nment -1 expect our City Council to make; ecrsions on what is good for our neighbor 00(15, our beaches and surrounding .con , ri untties,'This increased'densrty bench s no one but "the builders Tle problems associ ated with increased density are costing ail of its residents and taxpayers Please attend the `` City Council• meeting Apnl 11 and say no to increased_density thenne L aridis i erittosa Beach " of issue A Vvarning to Hermosa Beach _ Quietly ui a public forum, the Planning Commis sion �s giving developers carte blanche to shake aur neighborhoods the way they see fit, fol profit I'm riot against buildi•ng homes for •profit, I have a problem with the city planners giving away what they promised to keep In 1986, Hermosa Beach adopted an ordinance tohelp,preserve, the`character, of ourcity .with a merger provision:;in ac cordance:with state legislation:' That means zf a single house is sitting on two or more lots,>the city's plan is lo`merge _ these lots to make them one Froin 1987., into 1990, the city did ,fust that and merged more than 700 lots There are many rmore homes in Hermosa sitting on immerged lots that are being bought up =r and developed with :two or -more homes i The Planning Commission says that a precedent has been set, and therefore is granting variances and allowing multiple dwellings on what should be:smgle lots The three; lots at R38:Prospect Ave won't be merged end three houses will be `built there The owner of 726 Prospect '::` Ave wants -to build two homes oil what should have been one merged lof This issue (726. Prospect) is ;on the- City Council agenda for March '14 at 7 p m I, urge everyone; who can: iii, attend this, meeting and help set -the precedent, to stop the' overcrowding of our. city by those _. who ace onlylooking for profit and nota place to live. :Tim Lovekin ermosa Beach /GGZ//5, e � L • .,71/26.1 . PETITION TO OVERTURN THE JANUARY 17, 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING L-10 DECISION TO RELEASE THE TWO LOTS AT 726 PROSPECT AVENUE FROM THE LOT MERGER REQUIREMENT, THEREBY ALLOWING THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO SEPARATE PARCELS BY CHUCK HEIDMAN AYES: ALLEN, HOFFMAN, PERROTTI NOES: PIZER ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: KERSENBOOM Mr. Peter Tucker, Mayor Mr. Sam Edgerton, Mayor Pro Tempore Mr. Michael Keegan, Council Member Mr. J.R. Reviczky, Council Member C/O City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 We, the undersigned neighborhood residents and/or property owners, of the City of Hermosa Beach, hereby respectfully petition the City Council to immediately and unanimously vote to: 1. Overturn the Planning Commission hearing decision to release the two lots at 726 Prospect Avenue from the lot merger requirement and, instead, merge them into one parcel in accordance with the original intent and criteria of the Lot Merger Ordinance and Program. 2. Audit the Lot Merger Program as required to identify any and all remaining unmerged lots subject to the original intent and criteria of the Lot Merger Ordinance. 3. Reinstate the Lot Merger Program as required to merge any and all remaining unmerged lots subject to the original intent and criteria of the Lot Merger Ordinance. 4. Require public notice of all future Planning Commission lot merger requests for hearing to all residents and/or property owners within a 300 - foot radius of any and all remaining unmerged lots subject to the original intent and criteria of the Lot Merger Ordinance and Program. ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Loi q _ (q /6c3»-' pp Address: ( (S City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) ? - % -7 3 4 E -Mail: Signature: ONE NAME ANDISIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: L ctutz x -i` Address: a Lk (._ Com- Sd1 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) ctyi E -Mail: 1 OP-atk V ?ilr i Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE C f6t�i�(F O USKi Address: 115 $� SIREE-' City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) Jq P, • G e h3. E -Mail: CEt c fl JiK, KET Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: / g .ebe-frkiheA U� Address: %c/v ?DriL s r City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) .3�(0 e E -Mail: Signature: ildq,444 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: /4/an ?cite. /.640 ' Address: /•2 yY Y .574 - City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3 ? /OD F E -Mail: Ade 6AcA e .,nwi•^e✓er/oat. cow Signature: Name: ON NAM ND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 64 IthLfr;// Address: f 163( Qt4 State: California Telephone: (310) 3r4 1214 Zkjid bez e I aiitti. N.1 7' E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ���" Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE G As --R T Address: /1.3'I-/1 -z7 T City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) _3 7q C-) 741 E -Mail: --MRR i NCR / a a l%i z Signature: I -J -4-1.-2“,„c 41Aadz5--- Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATUREPER BOX PLEASE �t Address: 14S7 City: Hermosa Beach / State:taCalifomia Telephone: (310) 371 -1 Jc! )-- E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 0/4.- -Ga G ? d 9 Address: //c9 -(o- gt-4 &%• City: Hermosa Beach ' State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) -7`1 E -Mail: Signature: aet .27 AM/(o-& • ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Address: //ZS Nits47'�— SF" City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 37 ¢ 7s'4 s E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254. Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: G4 19/77 Address: ll aQ g ��'• City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) E -Mail: C3tc,) 374- 740.5- ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: AS o,J / f cG Y Address: 1 137 'Till .S City Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 324 CS -6q E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: / a"S''1 7 i/ ST - City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3 707-,6p93 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE heti- Address: ltj�b ��"``" i�'d-�-�Ae,tri„ krfriri - City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310 31 ) 37 (1.112--3 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signatur : 1' ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: rf (1k&,/(?ii4j- Address: 16 3 6 eft' 1/htA gtri044-0/4- 6,9CC City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 7r(1/ 3 7 E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Mc&trro Address: 12-2- 1731 te-nc Co u rr City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) J ?Z• 0 ' E -Mail: Signatur 61/ VAC &!/ ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 6(\iki /t l L1 -- Address: //SY "7E4 177v_e City: Hermosa Beach ///State: California Telephone: (310) X37- op hi, 7/ E -Mail: c/4/7 - Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 �/✓iii`/ _// ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 116; 1\Iw Address: 1i54 %110 - City: Hermosa Beach I, State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) °1b1- 1\p E -Mail: \\441 V11U U�V� J Ail I� O'7 Signature: • ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: QJ\JPJ. 44014 Address: 1 . \ City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 1/4 -L S (a1 ZIP Code: 90254 E -Mail: cks444c, CorA Signature: G �••��. ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: ki-tj' Gr Q- " Address: 01 b sT City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3 i9 ZIP Code: 90254 Name: ONE NAME AND S E PER BOX PLEASE Address: //z7 7g St City: Hermosa Beach "eluate: rnia Telephone: (310) 3 7 9-- C3 Z C E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 1 11 Ko.ik-o Address: • t O 36 ��� ( _ City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 57`-) -- L( -S E -Mail: ' f m �;� a�v-f-. r wAKs+ud Vo Yr? oh .11,cf Signatu Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: lo --4-0 City: Hermosa Beach cr State: California Telephone: (310) 4 $ R -7S‘Ci ZIP Code: 90254 E -Mail: 'Zc__VV\-tic.Vv-i t Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 441 -MM 0. 144 6AsF Address: g. QS f ROSPk-c ]' iQ fes. City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) —2-76--f-944 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: 0• 19kGr752-- Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE �lid 0,(60✓1Itel Address: (e6. Icird/ordf2 City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 37? _ 'r E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ()cat leor)g) Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE M 6u' u r/na fp 1267 6 sr. City: Hermosa Beach State:California Telephone: (310) 7g8'-- 19.6-6 ZIP Code: 90254 Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE eigey 50.5 /Ha Q Address: /Z67 677 S City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 7V- I FS^S' E -Mail: Name: Address: • • ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE aeig i'r7fE /.vi os /t37 Vet- %? City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 37 -79 3 SC E -Mail: gUC /A/70S6(/ Off ?omcCaDivj Signature: Name:tit ciW/1 Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 1�c13 74Ct 1074�-� City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 41(01 12- E -Mail: Signature: 4 -,-- Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Ses.)-F—40,1. £!Case Address: 11811 ifi FL State: California ZIP Code: 90254 City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) 713 ' 6103 E -Mail: Signature: Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Crii &/(. City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) Gil b 1(0 c% E -Mail: C4rt5±LM ( ve(diid, Signature: of to Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE fierfro boa le fivAs /a/0-sa4 $i' S City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) y/f..- E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE SAr k L4)1 aY' Address: ) 20 3 5} • City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: 1 41911/4- Name:C-e(aUl VY` ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: 1.735 C, �-i- City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 318 " 3 Lj 2-G1 E -Mail: Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name:4Ct61(/ (III�GLV!' f' Address: ( 73 5 Ovivk- City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 31 -34-t2 "I E -Mail: st rew. �. ltita L V, S� [d v e.1' , c,9s1„, Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNAT RE PER BOX PLEASE04* Address: L OA9 0 eV\ at • City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) x' 11,9a )14-aiz E -Mail: Signature: • Name: • • ONE NAME jAND SIGNATURE ^ PERCBOX PLEASE <A I Address: I2 Z '17 -it City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 31 g E -Mail: A5T!1OA'JUPS00%GeZ iIU(C. Nor ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE etic-ho,a(pw/t. 1( 1141 City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 37---Mt-p--1 E -Mail: Q9.0.AWIsi_t_e__ Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: S WA— Rftlst t,q-1A__ Address: • %I4I 1ti City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 319 - 19 f of E -Mail: SONS Mkt; e yA-NW a , OZON Signature: ‘)P • • Name: Address: ANE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE ''YY/ a r,C- / 3 % - % �1/2e-E7 City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) E -Mail: S u c% -q -ST \\o7 ‘w;.\, Y, cow• ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PITEASE Name: \c O L CA \ bi 90U Address: \a3 \` \No.ckoL City: Hermosa Beach State: Califomia ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3'Z S �� E -Mail: sc.c��.F-t ® \\ 1 c: -,. cavy. Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Ivo ec - yT 7)V-'77 Address: hA 3 //'`-Q-Q City: Hermosa Beach State: Califomia Telephone: (310) 3 - ` 6 '7 q/ E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 R. 0-- e_ra., Z d A / • `7\ ONENAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: % ,'!,n �/ -c.) ve �� h Address: I? y 6 &de & City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 737- 72-33 E -Mail: /o ve Vef e -c14 - H erP Signature: r f ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: MA2k AUV 711E Address: ` ` ` �-� City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3119- 88 y8 mat Q beS" ' bT • coni E -Mail: Signature: -7K-7 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: a„,.,,1d Address: i( c /-"free.,/4 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 1 te- `t, D7 E -Mail: Signature: &P. -4d ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: ElizAA MksNirk Address: 460 GAN+ry Sir 4 City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 1N-06(11 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: c dadk J4k1Icd ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: cu rdel/a. Address: 53S f roS®ed-ifiY. City: , , ^rns i rte n State: California Telephone: (310) 39-4-o 3 Ja h eel) Q jhoo.ca, v E -Mail: Signature: ga-sito-tA-d ZIP Code: 90254 Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE `iaer~z — S3S ?pc1. C ty: Hermosa Beac State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3?'Lf'o .f3 E -Mail: jairb yG. Signature: Name: ONE JJAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: u -Y Aviivro City: Hermosa Beach 5i - State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 53-ti�j E -Mail: Signature: 1-41fA?ViletTV •6$41 I e vdcw7.0^).,0_01-- 4%; Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE tsilnit4:er 004-61544Let- City: • - rmosa : e. • State: California Telephone: (310) 7 '31 7 -7,51.- d E -Mail: Lo -DAA' crdjaW c3A1-t Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: 122? GKDAVVVs�. City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 31 Ck:-- 0313 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: lcd2 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 12C 12/1-19e Address: I 5 0 1. 54''r4ZA•4 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) -[ 3 - (0 1- E -Mail: 420t aA- e`Te Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Mil, p S Address: `d() 1 City: Hermosa Beach �1 r State: California Telephone: (310) 1 (O ( 07 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: �( -(O t-1L:s 1� ( C - Address: City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3`14-3-2 ZIP Code: 90254 E -Mail: TOE2.,t al�,t� I Signature:Mt Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE ANnyte: �• lam. arc` J/'i � Address: 114 - BT -ti sr. City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 37 c/— ire 3 E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE L 910.= Address:k\-0 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) ^] L k E -Mail: Signature: 1‘\&12— Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: ‘40% \3o 611f City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) IVl(D-I to 12- E -Mail: State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURESIPER BOX PLEASE Name: 7 ' A Ze/./i ) Address: f/! 2 g �t City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 37V 6 .>7 E -Mail: �/7�i't¢i.' /1r3/7G — /`1ed, Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: /z/s- 7t4 City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) 376 --/6.5-7 State: California ZIP.Code: 90254 E -Mail• Wa.»f1her2,7LAer u.+I Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: AMU(iv ,n a/4'r /V t Address: 1.1%. g l kQ City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3'0 • I C'S E -Mail: G4 )ir) A k4V( • 04 r^ Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: MO L,,.,S Address: L, 61-4' 5 . City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) - g? - cr7 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE S-4/ vluk14-it. Address: 11 S �►'��-�-r trv-e- City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) -7 41 8 - C 6 51 E -Mail: 54A � , rvvoyot i G'iv & tie t` 34t.,St e2.1-ahSignature: 7l Name: Address: Or NAME AN SI NATURE PER BOX PLEASE v3teu•42.. /40 q)C44oe City: Hermosa Beach State: California 98.-5*(3Telephone: (310)J E -Mail: ��P .1MaG 142 Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: /4.ti o¢ 2 jAf,�fytl- 'z ? ?j c Address: City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) .3 7 4 STA" 7 E -Mail: ,LO ca) ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: ))ftrr /, "A < Address: 11 t S 9/b. /4. City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) .?1;) 5-Ys'� E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: t I OZ 131 Sr City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) .512'tQ 2y E -Mail: j WA% .Se,A0.,- Cow. Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 • • ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: O r" b'S rh i c Address: (1 2Co 6 sr: City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 37 4- t l 2(v E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: rs G.-.® Address: e r-9 City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) S f E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Address: /6 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Address: 12--1--`) 1( 'L—' cr 1 City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3 i 9 +7 5-0 E -Mail: j 11 4 dOQUQ.v a-.- •Gs -e -r Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: .211 Address: 1'Z77 City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) E -Mail: State: California 3-7 ?---2-())-( ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: fri13/11,q Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE ers 4r.oeh Address: ) oZ 1.3 11 `4% City: Hermosa Beach Q State: California Telephone: (310) 798 (i 0Q 6 3 E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 Name:/1/1 NI& iroveootki ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: Dty qier City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: a c CtkaL_ Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: ii5/3 ! ✓! City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) S 72-- - y , E -Mail: 41 [044415 6 \ter; Zany }1 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: at, Address: riA 1 6141 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 314 & A E -Mail: Signature: eAcx)AAA `D-94-/-0 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: .LYo/9 7 ,E �r�4,ea1I Address: /4. 7 G TEI Sy-; City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 374-740.5- E-Mail: 7G-/joS E-Mail: ly i)n Woe e„�.. Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: ANA fitat(*1.0 Address: I'2O CO CO" Si -0e' 4CV,Y►OS.QL City: Hermosa Beach r State: California Telephone: (310) 31(0 ' a-a�'►' E -Mail: a klkI r) -1@c451, wry) Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE lbt Name: Q, NNUVYV I Address: Ct4f\ City: Hermosa Beachte: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 61(1.(11v E -Mail: Signature: Name:titigiote JAIJ At -I -Red) • ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address:12A0 11L • City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) frr i4 - j 1 E -Mail: Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: CO u I --•C Sr)S y Address: 12-54 e4--4-. 9 -at -� City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 37 (o - `I 2 ( ( E -Mail: �arsL4t . InSC. eciK Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: IZSL R' -r4 Sr City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) 3 4-6 E -Mail: State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: (� kti c`( Dp_ioK LR Address: (4 2-' 6n' (AV64 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 546 '( 5( $ E -Mail: pawl— A✓iek.ec coves Signature: �.1 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name:iJ1jl(,Q S-%fr'.' Address: r1/97,. 11'6 Sir,€)----" City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 31(p 2-449 E -Mail: 1411 kV) lT a tht • IIX�I Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: 1 I I ( V-.1/1 City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) ,j105 —1V-CIFC E -Mail: Ma-nr.C '— . Chfrn Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE {1• (to LCold► (a e, Address: (215 5t' City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) qctea 35510 E -Mail: et(Q cMce tl'eA(; 2 cvl • tit Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 440019,6 Address: 1257 City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) E -Mail: State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: 1,4 k` ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: S ??L J Address: I Z. 4 3 g °r4 SiL C' : Hermosa Bea • State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) -7 TY t— E -Mail: SS 'tii (e Signature: ONE NAME ANDSIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: f1-1,1,,etV Address: id,.l City: Hermosa Beach State: 91ifornia Telephone: (310) 31 Z- r‘ 7 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Address: 2\ Ci Hermos State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 4 U ° % 9 E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Lairct€ m. roc41rro Address: 1 l ti P1a ce_ City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 31 �2 E -Mail: rcteCTl'tr\Z- nn -I 1. c y%&., Signature: .4�/ - Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: //b3 7Z, �`Z City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) :3 '7 Q- t.) ' - lab co, J -z,0 L6 c -b -Fe 117 . CA?? Signature: Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE //c 3 7%h' C; City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 379 e" 6 S E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE M cAN .. 1 A J o1-►vNSe) Address: ..1 - City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 17 i - -171 E-Mail:1 Signature: • Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE excekti Ifuq_or- Address: City: Hermosa Beach State:c�California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) � 2- '73(p / E -Mail: Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: S?Qt/6iJ L W Address: //340, City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 372- 736 f E -Mail: 11" Signature: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 17‘40ej E -Mail: /17 /sa f1eir�r� tae. ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE ER.qAn, L. TORY Address: Rads -7 419\ S+reeN-- City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 376- 1-1Lf1(o E -Mail: br Qin __Ij y` yahoo. c.,crcv-\ Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 16m GJkh5 Address: /.1f S 7141 City- ' ermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 37& E -Mail: Lin, q0 9:77 yadioo• cM-., Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE L.0 -CSN Address: 1 CC �-1-4 S • City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3-7 (0 • 3-12 3 E -Mail: QJI e44 . can/-tV/ (d efASkinzt kG. aftiA, Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: W14 f'o dGkt a Address: (6 Z / C' / P/4 cc City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) Vi Q b 17( E -Mail: C./ & C.A g- a .D r? Al lJ & .A 646 d • Signature: a44- /16 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: cbnn l'irtro.,r� Address: lV tc6=1 YAC, City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) $3 E -Mail: (rynlansri • Vex1,1 Signatur ZIP Code: 90254 Name: Address: LO ND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 57 ").---a`;""ef' E -Mail: Signat e: fr ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: •Au r Address: Ci . ermosa Be. • ..State: California Telephone: (310) TS.D 03c"\01(11,0 ItOLOLa0.60 E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: ArJJ ckti, Address: 124.E City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: L`II6AX Address: \Z -'k, <<t" ST.ecit-- City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) E -Mail: State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: Name: ONE NAAND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 11/G�i�Gc - 7� . Address: /e 7k ' City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) i 7 Z. bo �3 E -Mail: Signature: ede-t01141416 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 16 P -N . m/k) Address: iz'Lg l t N y! City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 370 1 C9 Z7 ZIP Code: 90254 E -Mail: 1-G 'Cfd6"VOA CoAi PI Signature: Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 'h&PrY 1 13 1 (01 (+viltiw�l AUt City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 37 E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE TfkR R. (4cD Address: t 2O ( e C -c CE City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 931O? E -Mail: R .,Z Gi aoccos e. 1_00 ,C6AA Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 014.44 -Pao Address: Ws s+re.e+ City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 31' 11116 E -Mail: Signature: • ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: LE&i' Lu'c Address: 1 I , +h City: ermosa Be s�- State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 76 CC -6 E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE GeOle yokAe Address: 'S4' City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) _ 3 `7 -- E-Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 2)3St c.4_‘(eflASt Address: %5 pro c f.c.t hV� City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 312 - (d 4 9 E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Ev A S Address: City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 31 S 1 41 `('g E -Mail: S\-0,0".(ze1'' e ,M.cc,\. eNrv‘.•sd. K12 . ca. .c.,3 Signature: Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 1278 g1i sit City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3 71-- '7S Y E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 57AMpeo--® MAu- . PVP oD . G, .US ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Address: I t•''S � S,4' City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) *i g '3 SIS. E -Mail: j lu41C Mo6a.don, Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: /-1 uiCE' ti Q 7— Address: Address: / 2 O5 7+11 $L,- L City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 9 3 - 99 9 Y ZIP Code: 90254 E -Mail: mid L sor r„ Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: C �l �v (G 5 LJ; limof Address: /24$ TtL f City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) '1 31 CI E -Mail: `BZW Ilv►,d-I- Qsw;(. Gou, Signature: C ki.). ZIP Code: 90254 Name: Address: ONE ME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE �uin/vus— ou /-23/ 7/-4 Z1 -7 -- City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) ugJ E -Mail: Signature: State: California 7 ZIP Code: 90254 qar-t-bu Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 4Aft,r dik. 4 Address: (o 41 41 44- City: L City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) I'S - (S(,(. E -Mail: Signature:—---�'� ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Qm1-1,..f°0- .-oas..sx-i Address: la 4 ► 4 Y. City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 4-$a Wok E -Mail: (xiAPM'.tl rra.4,4ti... ® ONS NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: eta ren Zee ,93(D (AA., Address: to toy `1i` City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) `31-a (0U ( ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: /! L( 44,1 S'$ 3 v Pri Address: City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) .37 5 -2 E -Mail: ix,i5 41.0,,,Ateris . VG,'; 2.01,, .� ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: GC ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: ha't'e G.0 << 610" - Address: "Address: 73 irerrd dee. City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) E -Mail: State: California s--c)-(t ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: AriMDCA5CktiN Address: NS— 7+(/\SV' City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) ges14"`1 State: California ZIP Code: 90254 E -Mail: nC1 • •W Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Pa44 tititrd, Address: IoTi 1 • City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) '314- `hal./ E -Mail: g Signature: fcbvIi, 2 o'di ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: DAG sTmetS Address: tOG .l S City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) S `� 1 E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 SONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 'RSA ki0v1 Address: t 0 6 S -.l City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) �(U l ( L( E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: NE NAME A SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Address: It. S4, ` SA City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) ".7 % S -6 E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE PL )Af- C0Vja,6C.-- l d 30- crry 5Y City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) j lot ' 1 �ci, E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: :.,datrw-to Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Rand kociakcu4 Io?t 641A Rake City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3 (S ' 361 2 3 E -Mail: vQndyYodw4.ah Vextz0K. rtT Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 • Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: ldN hot T. City: Hermosa Beach State: California Mil ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) vti-94:1--L- Z E-Mail: Signature: titotit‘ei. v-ottkev Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE D),ArtoS kok Address: ttto 0(0s O City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3l ac — --7ctca( E -Mail: -D3 . �-� - V1?�1� . >L� Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: " Ccs( l,L Address: 1 G. 3 ` City: Hermosa Beach f'kuee c? +4< S -% State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) o --G / E -Mail: ryjiULC i' l r hr 1 � Signature. 1/' . !ice � ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Address: //e. 1 44 ecAte. City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) LP/ /c47 -r 46; 70/02- filzem.614,' c E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 hlt Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE C (A) cf5o Address: 10201 v(ell 3f City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) q31 - z 37, L E -Mail: C5 WaiSO ,J1 ?7 @ OSD(. nwl Signature: Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE LrbVUYc( Wc±5O0 /2o City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) c;? - E -Mail: Signature: Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) ,- U\ -k E -Mail: �4,4 Signature: State: California ZIP Code: 90254 4,) Name: "ireONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE "LC(-ANky Address: /NO 1-104 1-14 S' -r City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 31$ 3359 E -Mail: /"gyp^" (`'A'''CS( 6/1l4 C . Co/1 ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Kris>tGIn j/ln u.t (wU Address: 11140 t° 51y - City.: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 31 3301 E -Mail: VvU St evi l ktik tikt4.ty y4.1.00• cnw Signature: Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE kra A rewy pov Al rote City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 1 S' 4a 0 a E -Mail: Signature: Al� ►� ' tr Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: lep, sox 2 gg- City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 7? -6-303 E -Mail: Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 'hh get -vanilla Address: 11(q cfrir City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) SRO- 4 272. E -Mail: State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: m Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) ,J/( E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: "- i:fSoa G c E, cam/ Address: I (`(U 111+ S . City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) '51 o - 6 3 C '�- E-Mail: 3--st: 16e\Pc.. P -4 . ,J f a Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 14 sA 2/6;fir- Address: WO 71-h S,'ttzii City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3i_ C36 % Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 1 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3 — 0,1 q1 E -Mail: Signature: 2-4 4 - ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: E`vt U Lauto- Address: 12.50 st(1r City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE fr'-. ../ Address: 12.5"-T) 99 S7 . City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 4.'1 q 6u,e‘ AddressAV5 S Q \SCA City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 6\1-1- (*3a\ E -Mail: &cL r \ Q., y ow,u o . c. o,r� I Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: I Address: City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) -27 1c2 1 Z� E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME ANDSIGNATUREPER BOX PLEASE Name: 1-i n h �� 56-11 Address: 1135- —14\ P I ' City: Hermosa Beach State: California . ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: G, ))151 `r\ ctoL cow) y ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 12)/X/ ETiE ! % Oi s Address: 8c4- 7,2oSPcc-7- X -'6". City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signatur t ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Karg_r1 AkKGxr iefer' Address: / 024 'el 3-I- . City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signatur Name: ONE NAME NM SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE OW‘; 'KW iCkt4 Address: I d Z2 "TriN 54 . City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: /I Signature: • Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE (A",(4 07 // ,,,4. 74-L5)-‘• City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) ? 7a E -Mail: /2-a. 4a)//, Signature: Ap471A‘u / C-627 Name:c-j Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 41A'l,E S LL LLA U/tq 1 d,1 ?bS- City: Hermosa Beach //S__ tate: California Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Vt tcdir�rrn.��ri Address: 1,n'3) "1"" S -n T City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) C641. .3 t$ s- E -Mail: tti4`U (.4,ri" � Q t ra r� Signature: O NE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Address: /?O //44t g City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: Name: Gee. Address: 11 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE or E - Erb erVturdt City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3 7" ^ E -Mail: re. --.e-b car h a r - (10 '�vi 5.- Signature: . C°M Name: Address: ONE NAM AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 60. • City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 OY) 10t \t•, Telephone: (310) E -Mail: 1� J 'fr ,A. Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: key/ gowe Address: /2„2,7 crm s f (t e'7( City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) ' 3 ? Y-722 S E -Mail: Signature: grau-P4-1 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: S7L (cy Kt, Address: 0-2=7 tcAl City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 37 Y -was E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: St? -41.4141e...1/0 c Address: /0 2 , / Pk CC- City: eCity: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 491/7 E -Mail: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: V/R G;,:/,49. G'• GA L L4.0 p Address: /f4 $ F-'' SV City: Hermosa Beach .State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: //44.7..)44-.00-4 Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE nloe�(� Address: Spe-ittokr) r{ � $l� <SfrLa- City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 371 '!3 E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: A- 10l' Address: 1�C7 15 i City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 37 6 -- E -Mail: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE p 1 Name: CA�-1,os RD A'S Address: 12.2-1 f (2 futvt City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) ' 319-011 ZIP Code: 90254 E -Mail: eAxto4.6tirre. Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: ra65 K04/4-1 /z7 -i iI/ - f (OA City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3 'lei --rti a ) E -Mail: • 0.,v-Lii-(y[,Q�••'+�G-•r 1 Address: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 54 444, yt Y'p , Address: /0 ZZ ?r© 5pc City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) f37 E -Mail: 5I G.-odet braeie rSe, State: California yc ce,441; ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: gliz4ierit u '/) Mee- Address: hl/ Cf 41 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) -37' �� E -Mail: 139 / 4mo 6,07441K, Per Signature: e ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: /d &/2 ! f< A I Z Address: )3' 64 —7 - City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3 7/ 8i2.241(1 E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: 161 8 FRa5P CrAV& City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) 16•7s3 i0 E -Mail: State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: 4-4 c ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3 7,2- - 4,;l7a-0 E -Mail: .j,pi2os e le"towd, , c-or1/4- Signature• ZIP Code: 90254 Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: 44-er. rt SSa,.� 11(95 2 ,<-- 1 City: ermos State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3i cs- E -Mail: b - s-cci t.)....Ie c .at Signature: 4,41 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: /1404-77 147..) Address: /221 irt6Etref S City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 66 ? - E -Mail: /tie f m #16 e Yr9A► .Cay A Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: R (C N 4j R ov7 S t 2 � Address: (2 7 7 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) . i d -379- 561_6 E -Mail: Signature: c 4-tt •f-25 'v��� ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Ala -74 4. E!'ow4Vc% v/95 c Address://''C 74/7 caree,7c" City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3/O"37k# 852,1 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: /j jANC/%X Address: //t/ 7 ,5-7%6€7- City: 7z er City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 71-0"-09/4 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ( c,fr'M—/ ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 0:544 40r661 Ada ss: 10'1) Il City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3 6 - X41 E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 Name:(1-Aa G-tketvt, ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: Ci Nti s)ki J46 State: California / Telephone: (310) 312- D . I E -Mail: (K.p 'y1011164, 0Y1Q6 tziC- co,st. Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name:.�1.L4t Address: /Q�f� > 'T - City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) `% 7 E -Mail: k./ 14.- S ;e...)• • Signature: ONE NAMEANDSIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: asAirANNA 7 aiA'I'r'Ri Address: //47— 7,4-h' �Zot+e� City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: G 1 Address: 17_10 1 1 1' t Q c -Q City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 131 — 22- !o Z E -Mail: L) hc5cc ;Lc) ✓' ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: 65 tin if ovJe,1l i Q, City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 33t/ -I Zlr E -Mail: Signature:/aAmt41,170-\, • Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE ky'lM.sMb1(, Address: Q.03 J �' City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE k Address: // S' y City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3 7y_ G G 7 C E -Mail: Signature: OgettA : /.3-G -it ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: f prM4'e /4 . 5 LGr-r f -z -- Address: It 'lb lod 5 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: yA,„.„ )11 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: / Address: City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3/8 S Zia ZIP Code: 90254 E -Mail: 1 / !_ V 10 601 .(21nel Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Aid ss,¢ % L is s Address: 62 6 P% s,o City: Hermosa Beach State: California. Telephone: (310) q 3 7-/76C E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE S Ar 6 6 fo sou City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 93 7 - / 7.6 Sr - E -Mail: E -Mail: Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: C haPfeS l(% - Address: /,',0/ — 991 L_ City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3701 go`Z % 1p E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE rr Name: [ L-- vV LL Address: /06— 6/6/ Pi' City: Hermosa Beach State: Califomia Telephone: (310) 7fr 5-6/0 E -Mail: Signature: 4 1w1 /4//1(11,4,k ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: SiS i, %/e �/ J Address: f cl2 // .Sf711 City: Hermosa Beach State: Califomia Telephone: (310) ,37?- 97 3/ E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: (te, Address: 11 f p 7 ?k r City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3 79 -5-no E -Mail: Signature: .,el m A_psviz Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE gu e IeWiRs 1 ,./y Address: /i6 0 17A 4 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3 7 9. S 2.S) 0 E -Mail: Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: , /7,let , /A1//d e Address: //f6 City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) cl/f 9 Jc E -Mail: Signature: Name:'6 /-/-611 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310)g* .25S- 310) '7' ".25S— z-- 14!! gslatiiy wi LOA Jiff -- E-Mail: Signature: ifAtif ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: AN/C. /Z/(_ Address: i0ts 3 10 ` u Sr City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) . 3'1 a 5 5? E -Mail: KEt/.4An9ic (%ia2.c%-I— Signature: i_ Signature: '—— Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE iti‘\1)(ks\o, CIwki City: Hermosa Beach t �, State: California Telephone: (310) 3%--1\ 7 `b E -Mail: 60.\t'SciCib3 \2,® \l i• -\f 01 \ONVLA9. Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: I W 4 LA- 2 e Siit Address: to l ce 14( -- City: 4( - City: Hermosa Beach State:. California Telephone: (310) 37't 4T7 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: 0 rzt tc_ City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) gC Z - ('S'R- E-Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: 4 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: C /kckqsj S Address: fotiki q14 S 1Yo f City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) g S q 0 i E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Jw,,T ft #kL!YJg IS/D frPE7- 4&'E. City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254. Telephone: (310) X97" 77/7 E -Mail: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: r Fek, Address: i V53 yr\ City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) - A.t - E -Mail: f(\4Ct4 adte/ky \M c, . V1 et Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Address: ((S8 Sf City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 1.9e-04(0_3 E -Mail: Signature: ZIP Code: 90254 1 i sco - Irn - cam, @,1aha . c-orv� . • ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: JS Address: t?r a7ib City: Hermosa Beach Telephone: (310) .77`7 -yam E -Mail: I' State: California ZIP Code: 90254 ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: 4; fc e Address: 420,2 74 ,Ch - City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 3 79 19fel) ZIP Code: 90254 E -Mail: r,%me ado r;k- t e7& Signature: eg- Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE ILTA BEtiJJk Address: 1210-711 s r• City: Hermosa Beach g• g State: California Telephone: (310) 3 7 3 'I-- E-Mail: I—E-Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: Name:(\Ile_ t\- lock, ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: t Z- 4 5 (0 "Or` City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 319 ^ &CDZ 9 E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: A Address: OP/ /fk City: Hermosa Beach State: California Telephone: (310) 7‘22 - c E -Mail: ZIP Code: 90254 Signature: Name: Address: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE 0 i' /' jwF (Zi`- /'a City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) j �� Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE SQN A (l . ESSE.)a Address: ) tD S) City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) 3) S 2 E -Mail: ) 1-k , Q R L) N.)01— Signature: )L Signature: \. ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Name: Address: City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: Name: ONE NAME AND SIGNATURE PER BOX PLEASE Address: City: Hermosa Beach State: California ZIP Code: 90254 Telephone: (310) E -Mail: Signature: RECEIPT ,7i1/0 PETITION AGAIN' RELEASE FROM LOT MERGER REQUIREMENT 726 PROSPECfAVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CHUCK HEIDMAN, APPLICANT HEARING L-10 JANUARY 17, 2006 7:00 P.M. Attached original petition with 76 signatures received January 17, 2006 from Gregor E. Eberhardt, 1126 8th St, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. Name: Title: Department: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ECEiVED JAN 1 7 2006 7,0M. DEV. DEP f. • • PETITION AGAINST RELEASE FROM LOT MERGER REQUIREMENT 726 PROSPECT AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CHUCK HEIDMAN, APPLICANT HEARING L-10 JANUARY 17, 2006 7:00 P.M. We, the undersigned neighborhood residents and/or property owners of Hermosa Beach, California, herebypetition against the release of 726 Prospect Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California from the lot merger requirement in accordance with Sections 16.20.010 through 16.20.100 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Name: ari- Address: 112 S4- • City: e -r rf O sG+ Re.ac.I1 State: CA Signature: ZIP Code: 9 O Z. .S a-4\4411,16 Name: Address: City: sem• Ze4ck ZIP Code: UZV Name: Z. �l Address: / 21."'7 7 4_ city: !� State: Signature: ZIP Code: Y Name: rYl v r n a_ .4" Y14'Pe,yi J Address: //R (O 1+11 574 City: F` rri ds -c e-� State: C - Signature: ZIP Code: GSD .2S Name: /�-'f-0Sep1l MDC( 1 I Address: ! LW 11 5-ireof- City: h-erma-4 beathi State: CA Signature: ZIP Code: qi Mta�a�f� Name: Address: l x312 1-41ST- - City: 141,11)31)--- 914404 State: (4 ZIP Code: ft) Signature: 1 /rt Name: 4 efir.nc;,., Address: 2 C) T City: State: C I& Signature. aa11111111 ZIP Code: t 54 -4Vt. Name: m;�.�� Address: I )\ SO 1 City: e.�'M��G l�l2Gdi-- CA-- State: I-t' State: C ZIP Code: 9‘00 1(1 Signature: Name: f/ h-i_Z !. ( /(r ' /k -6 /// 7 / Address: / �, • (,/- City: lie 1-nie.:2561 ,<i.rhi State: (14' Signature:' er--> • ZIP Code: c/lr 2514_ Name: Address: City: 103 • State: CA -- ZIP Code: 9t2s Signature: Name: Nlaelle fe/5fl7 Address: 066- I WA- 5)L City: Pero 64 Brae h1 State: elk"-- ZIP Code: 96 Ike Signature: Name: .� t1.... '�. w t Address: t t % n \ • City: State: Signature ZIP Code: /e / j :' '1�/t /4 /. i �,/. , .= Name: sko Address; JZa c-fL State: CAI - Code: 9a2 97 71*.6- AIWA* Signature: Name: l ` an Fx.n,i//3,• 1133 -0- SI -- Address: City: { Ii/!h'0 IX.a- State: C!Q- ZIP Code: Cl°26-11 Signature: /T7a'y ..m.:taA,ta J?a2k Address;, 1221 s+Gk City: \()K - State: ekZIP Code:q0 2-54 Signature: ^� J Name: dc)fM/\ C:e_ (SL Address: City: S4 - State: NPS. (A - Signature: ZIP Code: ei(f e.s ci • Name: .. at, /iYA g •e 4.Ai re -1-E Address: � 2 CIS" O 'ft% 5 • City: f-le' p o yam -.. C State: c-- / ZIP Code: ' C'( Signature: Name: P�i'y� lPrrt-: Address: 1 )--(4 rtk C L YL o s S etc n City: State: Signature: ZIP Code: dro y Name: *it,hatfii5 Address: Uo U Frit city: U5ln_%bin State: a ZIP Code: Goys 9 Signature: Name: aeVW\ I4k 115 Address: 113 0W14- s4 . City: Rewoosr/L, &otcAn State: ZIP Code: qoz t j Signature:. --- "OR Name: Address: /I6D s •—,4 City: State: rte! ZIP Code: 91 ,a,c21 Signature: /co�•�•.,, f # Name: Address: l ko'Z City: W1c)$q Qp.C,t+t State: 044- ZIP Code: Z Signature: Name: 0(vlt!!4 gee14ore) �( Address: !! a J S SY-ye ti City: 1/2„trL. tes State: ( A ZIP Code: Signature:i��3���e�C,�[ L Name: Address City: State: - .4.144/�/ 7S S'"i-t s, . ZIP Code: Signature: Name: 1Thra(L\ Mc t.L1(2. Address: l < I (Q �,SL✓L�, City: ksiimimqkq State: Signature: ZIP Code: ci4 4424' Name: Uevogo F erogbe Address: (I (6 Seveu414 £4. City: 1 -}CV rno sa Feacin • State: CA- ZIP Code: O2c4 Signature:GOtiguaeio S V Name: ; 4(r'Ltt gat Address:ty.a flerynile# //©Ci'e4 State: &'G Signature: ZIP Code: rao, Name: /IQ/ye? , Erown Address: Nie# % sz4,7/7-e' !' City: ilefi*27 5c ' � i Li State: a ZIP Code: 9o,/,63‘. Name: Address: i /3 b City: 4ERttr1�w ZIP Code: -10aS State: Signature: Name: Aug Ae.44 Address: 1tik _ ^)r Stt'eer City:fXn a Px ft O State: coil_ O1 O7 ZIP Code: Signature: �.. Name: rqrelAma?+..D=ll Address: 1 I k 4334115k— City: ��QfWtL5J\ D¢. State: Signature: ZIP Code: ?c5. y Name: SOK * •: 4141)4A. Address: 1141 /..fir. sr. City: APJUrive.)6.- ?OAS. State: 4. ZIP Code: Signature: ozs1 Name: Address: City: A9y-u-ectio (Po- fictralq ala( i41,03 dpote,4 Name: �t K ARt) 8 v% 54 Address: 112'l• -re e s� City: -l*R i d1t 8414 State: CA ZIP Code: It, .7. 064 Signature: rt4.A.44 Name: I � t't4 L /0-C1) City: /4-1Z_ 1/14 0 <A - State: a- ZIy�Z.cl Signature:`'"-� Name: S+aCJ f t ovrtza/T) Address: 7/5- City: (cern 8e a C4 State: ZIP Code: 96; Signature:.i'�'` 5(k'♦ - Name: Jot).. j A A.O Address: it Q e C\ City: /kert4426A 9e0.chCA et 07);4 t State: 61° " CA ZIP Code: C 6 261 Signature: Name: 4ITHuR 0. MD E Address: ,gCD5 PAO5PPG7' 4 I/E city: laRltiOC B Elf C4 state: GAL1Fog(f i4 Signature: ZIP Code: 4? 0 2.5 0 Name: •, '� Address: it OS— 7/?...e3sp; e). )9oe, City: F,eiyos /9 :C4L State: (t Signature: ZIP Code: a O ZSt Name: 5 ....)& FSS Address: 1 051 2 *1'1 City: nr.OSA ��in►G1N State: Signature: ZIP Code: 90'avS Name: ad • M1'4 Te./ Woc Address: (l// 4&' 5-7— City: T City: rrrtosa- 4ea.cL State: Ce- ZIP Code: ?a e S`S' Signature: Name: 3Vft5ciU Address: /O,S 7 ? 7N Pt4 CGI City: Ilex -mem t3 $1 CH State: Signature: ZIP Code: re0-5-7 Name: Address: / A rt5 r-1‘_- 1r % City: State: P Code: Signature: Name: 7t,.i t/ Address: i',/ ! jn D//4G j ,4` -c City: /kl.ii4 P11/1 -FA State: C4 Signature: 1/4 ZIP Code: 4Q2 -5.-y Name: UL4D171/ 1. i✓zci, 5 Address: 8D3 PrA5f€eT / j% , City: #tn&sa LL State: ca ZIP Code: Signature: c:5k1. Name: lipeN . (1\Py1A Address: 1010 �E,tG&- -r�-t, p City: tAelriMaS A koc-n . State: �' A Signatu . ZIP Code: CO Name: � 51'7 Address: 1-2-'"? 41 0 City: Her rva4.7 &c. 1 State: C4 ZIP Code: 90.2-S;{ Signature: Name: (o't4.,. (rrs4(,.. , 6.72) 1/1/ Address: 12-.5-3 c9 r1 "t ?'e City: f4D S ' AI( State: CA . Signature: ZIP Code: Name: noels T! Ili E L , RO IS I ni S 0 A/ Address: /t217 0 -- $G. City: 6•ctt =/lt l"1 y 31'i 13 & l c 14 State: e A ZIP Code: 9oxs y Signature: ./14,e-AaPtJ2) A>t61 Name: Ev& Le -e S 4p-far Address: 1 9-1 & 8'}'j'' S City: Peril...J40. c.A--N Name: - I �kSCJ Address: V7A, b '74 City:�it-- State: G A" Signature: ZIP Code: C1 C)?5** Name: Park Lee Address: 11-50 $Y'4 S f City: 11r6 S vgeKr. State: C4 - Signature: ZIP Code: q6 Zs Name: cL.f /4,2— Address: laSD f4"-- City: f` City: 13.4...1--Ara- State: --A State: c-4'9` ZIP Code: dl Signature: Name: i- ed27 Address: // 'r el' Si?ZLct City: ,€m".3 ,�ac State: �f42 Signature: /71 ZIP Code: %ate T Name: (arts c4. > fre*hs Address: Ito $ $4h S city: Aermosctakciri State: (DV% Signature: ZIP Code: 16 25q Name: Address: City: State: Name: £ iQ1 j fits . Address: //sy //s'ffh City: /1 /9)j Ne41/.4 State: C --Al Signature: // fro IP Code: 9cZ-51l Name: /(7/24J 4.J7 t/ Address: (VZ 4 Vi -4 City: 4eW o541 CH State: CA ZIP Code: 2-5 Signature: Name: c-0 to\._ Cal4VAddress; 11 544-K c:r City: State: ____C --Aid_ ZIP = • - °ld 246. Ark _A._ "r-Igill11"°.- 4 Signat Name: e ---7 -7;p1 /....c) U€� Address: / 94-4. City: t"eriffiZA_ State: Signature: /,.�--� ��$ ZIP Code: b :Y Name: Address: City: State: I-01mA Lova:, ZIP Code: 10 Signature: NiAL w�AI S- Name: \ \,.2Sz , � C� Address; \N et, \ City: \�\\`Z'C•`�`���p�_ �-q -1441\' State: �- ZIP Code: cz\%�: Signature: Name: Address: City: State: ZIP Code: Signature: Name: Address: City: State: ZIP Code: Signature: April 4, 2006 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council • ////p‘, Regular Meeting of April 11, 2006 LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR THE LOMITA RAILROAD MUSEUM EXPANSION PROJECT Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the Mayor to send a Letter of support to Congresswoman Jane Harman for the Railroad Museum Expansion Project. Background: I have attached a request from Susan Dever, President of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments, asking that the City Council express its support for the $1,000,000 grant from the federal government for the project. Like other projects in the South Bay, this is a unique resource that is open to all. The City Council supported Rancho Palos Verde's efforts last year in their effort to add more open space, which was successful. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager SAMPLE LETTER April 2006 The Honorable Jane Harman 2400 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Dear Congresswoman Hannan: I am writing in support of a $1 million appropriations request by the City of Lomita for. their Lomita Railroad Museum. The appropriation will help fund the much needed expansion of the museum, adding additional educational facilities, community meeting space, and integrated outdoor space. This appropriation would supplement $200,000 already raised in private contributions and an additional $200,000 pending before the California Cultural and Historical Endowment. The Lomita Railroad Museum has been in existence since 1967 and is owned by the City of Lomita and operated by a board of directors. The museum currently draws 6,000 to 7,000 visitors per year, serving the greater South Bay community, including school children, parents, and members of the Lomita Historical Society. Many school groups have expressed interest in using the museum for instructional hands-on field trips aligned with the State Education Content Standards in California history. The current space, however, is too small to accommodate such requests. The Lomita Railroad Museum is a valuable resource to residents throughout the South Bay. Expansion will allow the museum to serve an even greater community and to accommodate the needs of schools and children who would like to use the museum to meet their educational goals. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to aid in the success of this important appropriations request. Thank you for your time and. consideration. Sincerely, 1 PARCEL 5,211 S.F. PARCEL SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT V1APN SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS 0. 60637 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 7 AND 8 OF TRACT NO. 1851, AS PE MAP 'ECOHDED IN 300< 25, PAGE 40 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COU\TY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. ( ANDREW IGLOI SUBDIVIDER RECORD OWNER: ANDREW IGLOI AND VICTORIA IGLOI THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 3 UNITS, WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. EASEMENT NOTE: EASEMENT OF WARREN GILLELEN, FOR WATER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617, PAGE 47 OF DEEDS. SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ). SS. COUNTY OF LOC, ��" eke ) QRpf ESSI0/6. 4.c. .R,-1 J • Rt; ' <ci, v) w No. 30826 rnx, * Exp. 03-31-06 s> CIV \\- 0�� 9TF OF CAV_\ ' ON g1A L&II�t (, lode, BEFORE ME, ` t2 A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONAL Y APPEARED Vare...4. . 3\,f)'t PERSONALLY KN WN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON TH.E BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(rs)' WHOSE NAME(S)- IS/A.R-E SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/FA-FE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME I HIS/14E-RI-TVETht AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEI-R SIGNATURE .S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(&, OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(,S)'ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. • \pND s GrN E - EXP 4itZjap.7 * NO. L007370 cs>\. „ kOF CAS ----1 WITNESS MY HAND: AND OFFICIAL SEAL: NOTARY RIJBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE NAME: + 2-eitUI to 1' ti a u r PRINT NAME OF NOTARY MY PRINCIPAL PLACE pF IS IN /65 ++ate MY C MMISSION EXPIRES MY COMMISSION NUMBER BUSINESS COUNTY 4%25.07 14016/67 • ENGINEER'S STATEMENT REC.eiyE MAR 2 1 2006 COM, DEA/ DEQ THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF ANDREW IGLOI ON 07-05-2005. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. GARY J. ROEHL R.C.E. 30826 EXPIRATION: 03-31-06 RECORD DATA WAS TAKEN FROM TRACT NO. 1851, M.B. 25-40 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. dat).a./leVYLei DEPUTY -R ZOO 737 ' 1.5 DONALD L. WOLFE CITY ENGINEER ,3//.5/06 DATE EXPIRES /2/307 COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP; THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER. COUNTY ENGINEER BY DEPUTY R.C.E. NO. EXPIRES CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE ___ DAY OF , 20___ APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE ___ DAY OF , 20 SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE IN ! I,II_ _-111111-- SCALE: 1" = 20' SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS BOULEVARD W W zI 0 PARCEL V AP NO. 60637 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES • • • INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP * TRACT NO. 1851 M.B. 25-40 2 10' 0' 0 0 O N 10' 2 10' 10' 10' FD BRASS DISC NO REF 0 0 O G0 O O S'LY LINE OF LOT 6 * N 77'50'00"E 86.51' • •_ O 0 O t7 0 0 0 r) • 5,211 SQ FT O fo 0 t N 7T50'00"E N'LY UNE OF LOT 9 * N 77'50'00"E 87.21' 20' 20' FD L&T PER P.M. NO. 18813, P.M.B. 206-46 11TH STREET 4 0' 4 20' W 0 0' 20'