Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES-91-5488 (CUP/1160 AVIATION)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 �.✓ 27 28 RESOLUTION 91-5488 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO MODIFY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE-THRU TAKE-OUT WINDOW IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OPERATION OF A RESTAURANT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1160 AVIATION BOULEVARD, "JACK-IN-THE-BOX", LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1-4 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 149, REDONDO VILLA TRACT. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on August 27, 1991, to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and hereby makes the following findings: A. That the existing operation of the drive-thru activity upon the property at 1160 Aviation Blvd. ("Subject Property") has resulted in significant disturbance to the adjacent residential area. B. Late evening and early morning noise from the business activity conducted upon the Subject Property has been heard by and disturbed the quiet use and enjoyment of the adjacent residents inside their homes. C. Noise from the business upon the Subject Property has substantially interfered with the public health, safety and general welfare in that residents have been awakened and disturbed at late night hours because of loud noise and activity from the Subject Property. D. The Appellant was unable to provide an acceptable method of controlling such late night loud noise and activity other than restricting the hours of operation. WHEREAS, based on the foregoing findings and other evidence presented at the public hearing, the City Council concludes as follows: - 1 - A. That all appropriate notices of the subject hearings were 1 given to and received by the applicant. 2 B. The applicable Conditional Use Permit for the Subject 3 Property (Resolution 154-576) is out of date and not adequate 4 to resolve the impacts caused by this drive-thru restaurant. 5 C. The existing operation of the drive-thru activity upon the 6 Subject Property is inconsistent with certain criteria for 7 issuance of granting a Conditional Use Permit as set forth in 8 Section 10-2 of the Zoning Ordinance including, but not 9 limited to, subparagraphs 1, 2, 4, 5, 9 and 12 of said 10 section. 11 D. That the drive-thru activity upon the subject property 12 adversely affects the public health, safety and general 13 welfare of the community and the inhabitants of nearby and 14 adjacent residential properties have been deprived of the 15 quiet and peaceful enjoyment of their property. 16 E. The existing operation of the restaurant causes a nuisance to 17 surrounding properties and pursuant to Section 1800(5) of the 18 zoning ordinance, necessitates modification of the conditions 19 of the Conditional Use Permit. 20 F. Strict compliance with the conditions of approval, as 21 modified, will serve to resolve the nuisance problem and will 22 mitigate any negative impact resulting from the conditional 23 use permit and will protect the public health, safety and 24 welfare. 25 G. That should any finding or conclusion be determined to be 26 unsupported by the evidence, the City Council hereby 27 concludes that each individual finding and each individual 28 - 2 - �...� 2 3 4 14.r 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 �••' 27 28 conclusion is sufficient to support the modification of the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby Modify a Conditional Use Permit, to authorize a drive-thru take-out window in conjunction with the operation of a fast food restaurant, at 1160 Aviation Boulevard, subject to the following conditions of approval: SECTION I Conditions of Approval: 1. The hours of operation of the restaurant itself, including deliveries, shall be limited to between 6:00 AM to 12:00 midnight Sunday thru Thursday and 6:00 AM to 1:00 AM Friday and Saturday. The drive-thru hours shall be limited to between 6:00 AM and 11:00 PM Sunday thru Saturday. 2. The business shall provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons on the premises. 3. The exterior speaker box shall be kept at a level so as not to expel excessive sound into the parking lot. Any question as to volume levels shall be resolved on site by the Planning Department. 4. The existing landscaping shall be maintained and all weeds shall be removed. In addition, 24" box trees shall be planted at 15 feet on center along the south and east property lines. The specified type shall be subject to approval by the Planning Director prior to installation. Said landscape improvements shall be completed within 90 days after the adoption of this resolution. 5. An employee who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. a. The conditional use permit conditions shall be placed on the property in a location where employees can easily read the conditions. 6. The property owner/manager shall meet with the Planning Department within 60 days after the adoption of this resolution to discuss a possible parking lot redesign. If the Planning director decides that an alternate plan is feasible, such plan shall be implemented within 90 days after approval. 7. The operators of the business shall be responsible for maintaining the line of vehicles for the drive-thru window in a manner that does not obstruct vehicle movement within the parking lot nor obstruct access to parking spaces. - 3 - 1 ,*wool 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8. Prior to the conditional use permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the planning department, an "Acceptance of Conditions" form, signed by the property owner, and notarized. 9. A conditional use permit shall be recorded with the deed, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 10. This Resolution supersedes Resolution P.C. 154-850 and Reso- lution P.C. 91-45. SECTION II Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if any of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. SECTION III The City Council may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. Any violation of the conditions of approval and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be grounds for a public hearing for the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit and/or the issuance of citations. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 10th day of September, 1991. -PR SIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK a APPROVED AS TO FO ���Q ��/�� CITY ATTORNEY p/pers1160 - 4 - L� \NOV STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH } I, Naoma Valdes, Deputy City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 91-5488 was duly and regularly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach at a Regular meeting of said Council at the regular meeting place thereof on September 10, 1991. The -vote was as follows: AYES: Creighton, Essertier, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Midstokke NOES:- None ABSENT: None DATED: September 12, 1991 Deputy City Clerk