Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution 97-691 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 RESOLUTION P.C. 97-69 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO INCORPORATE CERTAIN POLICIES PREVIOUSLY SET FORTH IN POLICY STATEMENTS. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 18, 1997, to consider amendments to the Zoning Ordinance with respect to previously adopted policies and to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. Established policies of the Planning Commission previously set forth in "policy statements" had question'.lble legal status since they were not a part of the Zoning Ordinance, and therefore should be incorporated into the Zoning Ordinance. 15 NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 California, hereby recommends that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amending Section 17.44.090(c)firstparagraph to read as follows: "C. In residential zones, garages or parking stalls fronting on a public street shall be set back a minimum of seventeen ( 17) feet from the exterior edge of the nearest public improvement (sidewalk or street improvement) if roll-up garage doors are installed, or set back twenty (20) feet if standard garage doors are installed . On streets where public improvements for sidewalks have not been completed the above setback shall be measured from the edge of the required or planned sidewalk. This measurement does not include structural supports or other parts of the structure provided parking dimension and turning radii are not obstructed." SECTION 2. Add th~ following new Section to Chapter 17.46, Yard, Height and Area Restrictions: "17.46.152 Front Yard Requirements for Through Lots A. The required front yard on "through lots", as defined herein, shall be provided on the street frontage where the majority of the existing dwelling units on the block are fronting. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 B. The following list indicates which frontage is designated the front yard for various blocks with through lots: Through Lots Located Between: Ava Avenue and Ardmore Avenue Ava Avenue and Springfield Street Barney Court and Meyer Court Bonnie Brae Street and Campana Street Monterey Boulevard and Culper Court Monterey Boulevard and Loma Drive Monterey Boulevard and Morningside Dr. 15th Place and 16th Street The Strand and Hermosa Avenue Front Yard Shall Be Provided On: Ava Avenue Ava Avenue Barney Court Bonnie Brae Street Monterey Boulevard Monterey Boulevard Monterey Boulevard 15th Place Both The Strand and Hermosa Avenue (See Exception Below) C. Exception for The Strand/Hermosa Avenue Through Lots: New developments shall be required to p~·ovide front yards on both The Strand and Hermosa Avenue. For existing developed properties and remodeling and expansion projects thereon The Strand shall be designated the front yard. For the purposes of calculating required open space in the various residential zones, the Strand front yard area may be counted towards the open space requirement. SECTION 3. Add the following new Section to Chapter 17.46, Yard, Height and Area Restrictions: "17.46.154 Yard Requirements for "Half-Lots" Fronting on Alleys The alley side of the lot is considered the front, but the alley yard requirement is a depth of three (3) feet from the property line on the ground floor and one (1) foot on the second floor and above." SECTION 4. Amend Section 17.50.040(C) "Comprehensive Sign Plan" to read as follows:. "C. Comprehensive Sign Plan to be Required on Proposed Commercial Developments. The applicant shall submit a sign plan for the development showing the location , size, color and, if possible, copy for all signs proposed for the site; the sign plan shall include a rendered elevation, showing all signs in relation to the structure. The theme of such signing shall be approved as a part of plans for new multi-tenant commercial or industrial developments, and shall be an integral part of the development." 2 .... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ( 29 SECTION 2. This resolution supersedes and repeals Planning Commission Policy Statements 86-2, 87-1, 87-2, 88-1, 91-1, 91-2, 92-2, 93-1, 93-2, and 94-1. VOTE : AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Comm. Perrotti, Merl, Pizer, Cbmn. Tucker None Comm. Schwartz None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P .C. 97-69 is a true and complete record of the actio~n by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their re~_;t~vj,11b ..-18, 1997 . Ja«~✓ ~ 3