HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/05/84= A`
''FLATTERY IS ALL RIGHT - IF YOU DON'T INHALE.''
-Adlai Stevenson
AGENDA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, July 5, 1984 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Regular Session - 6:30 p.m.
All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
It is requested that anyone who wishes. to speak on any matter, please
give their name and address for the record.
Any complaints against the City Council, City Management, or depart-
mental operations will be submitted in writing to the City Manager
for evaluation by the appropriate department head prior to submission
to the City Council.
Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the
Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
1. SOUTH BAY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR FUNDS.
2. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO CREATE A CITYWIDE COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE MELLO-ROOS ACT OF 1982.
3. BALLOT MEASURES FOR NOVEMBER., 1984 ELECTION.
a. Amendment of Civil Service Ordinance re. political
activities.
b. Landscaping Maintenance District
C. Hydrocarbon recovery
d. Mello -Roos
e. People's initiative re. open space lands.
ADJOURNMENT
F
/'1
t 1 �e-
July 30, 1984
City Council Meeting
July 30, 1984
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
RECOMMENDED ORDER OF MEASURES ON BALLOT
SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 6, 1984
Recommendation:
That the City Council reach consensus and approve the order of
the measures on the ballot.
Analysis:
The �y Manager's recommendation is as follows
�tCQ1. Open Space People's Initiative
?Ass
2. Mello -Roos Community Facilities District
3. Oil - Maintenance Yard
4. Oil - South School Site
5. Civil Service Amendment
Kathleen Reviczky, ity C r
Alana Mastrain, Assistant City Manager
July 30, 1984
City Council Meeting
July 30, 1984
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
BALLOT MEASURES - WORDING
SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER G, 1984
OIL DRILLING - CITY MAINTENANCE YARD
Recommendation:
Change wording - taking out
tidelands".
Direct the City Attorney to
"No well to be bottomed within the
change impartial analysis accordingly.
yj&4�, %- (�2
.� ? XW"
Ka hleen Revic y, Ci C k
CONCUR:
Alana Mastrian, Assistant City Manager
LQHZOH3dV allV aDVdS N3do GaIVN0IS8a „SQNVZ ZOHrgnS„ NIIIZHHO
NHHM `S86T 7,znr QHSIAHH `NVgd gVHHNaD HOVHg VSOWHHH HO ASIO
HHZ 30 SNHWH'IH HOITdS NHdO HHZ HO ZNHWH'IH HSn QNVZ HHS gVadHH
HO `QNaNV `AHIQOW OZ HZVHOZOHZH HHZ 30 HZOA V SHHInOHH HOIHM
QH,LdOQV Hg T9L-t8 'ON HONVNIQHO HAIIVIZINI S,HZdOHd HHZ ggVHS
SQNVq HOFIdS NHdO
LMv'I
HMS HAI,LdWHHHd OZ WH03NOO OZ SHHXO`IdWH dO SHI,LIAIIDV 'IKOI,LI'IOd
30 SlIWI'I HH,L SHSIAHH HOIHM QHZdOGV Hg `'IIONnOO AZIO HHZ Ag
SHH,LOA HHZ OZ QHSZIWgnS aDMVNIQHO NV `09L -f'8 'ON aONVNIQHO_ZZVHS
SHHAO'IdWH 30 SHIIIAIIDV gVDIII'IOd NO SlIWI'I - HOIAHHS 'IIAIO
zSHSOdHnd gvNOI,LvOIIQH
H03 A'INO GaSn Hg OZ QHAIHHQ HnNHAHH HHZ QNV `SQNVIHQIZ HHZ
NIHZIM QHWO1109 Hg OZ 'I'IHM ON `H,LIS 'IOOHOS HIMS HHWH03 HHZ 30
Q'IHId JNIAVgd HHZ 30 2LH6'QNnOg H,LHON HHZ ONOZV HZIS HHOV-HNO V
WOHa SVD QNV UO 30 ONIZZIHQ HHZ H03 MOggV OZ S'I'IHM UO ZSNIVDV
NOI,LIgIHOHd•HHZ SQNSWV HOIHM QH,LdOGV Hg `ZOIHZSIQ 'IOOHOS
AZIO HDVaR VSOWHHH HHZ JO ZSHnOHH HHZ IV ZIONnOO 11I.3 HHZ Ag
SHHZOA HHZ OZ QH,LZIWgnS HONVNIQHO XV `69L-tS 'ON HONVNIQHO JgVHS
HZIS 'IOOHOS HIMS - ONIZZIHQ UO
4SHSOdHnd CIKVUXHvd
CNV HO6'dS NHdO H03 SHIZHHdOHd HHHZO HO 'IOOHOS SSSOXH HZgVUIVAV
30 INHWHAOHdNI QNV HONVNHZNI BIW ` NOI ZI S I IIOOV ` QNOOHS CIMV
(A IM-30-,LHDIH GVOH`IIVU QNV `HZZHxHVd MHIAVHS `HZIS 'IOOHOS HIMS
HHIfOOV OZ QHSOdOHd) `T 'ON ZOIHZSIQ SHIZIU DVa &IINnWWOD 30
SNSWZOVNH HHZ WOH3 DNIlgnSHH SSaNQHZgSQNI QHQNOE ANV HOnQHH
-GJT QHSn QHAIHHQ HnNHAHH HHZ
a�� nn-'QHVL 3ONVNalNIVN AZIO HHZ IV alIS allDV-HNO V
WOH3 SVD QNV 'IIO 30 DNIggIHQ HHZ H03 MO'I'IH OZ STIHM UO ZSNIVDV
NOIZISIHOHd HHZ SQNHWV HOIHM GHZdOGV Hg `ZIONnOO 7UIO HHZ Ag
SHHZOA HH,L 01 QHZZIWgnS HONVNIQHO Nei `89L -V8 'ON HONVNIQHO ggVHS
auv& HONFINHZNIvw AZIO - JNITIIHQ 'IIO
tS-9-TT NOIZOH'IH 'IVdIOINnW 'IVIOHdS - SMISVHW 10 IVE1
-PBGT `OZ ATnr pOSTA@d
L
t861 `OT ATnr
u014dopu s;T as;j�
Aup u;uaa;ItI ag; u'cgq. a94UT q-ou aapuGH Asled aq; uz pausTTgnd a
o; aou-euzpao aq; asnuo puu a2-essud aq4 o4 ;sa;;u TTugs xaaTO A;T
au4 puU u�lzs TT-cqs JOSuW ag; `A;zO au; To saa40A aq; Aq paq-dop-q
uaaq s -eq aouUuzpao szgj ;Ugq- uozq-U3Tjz4aa3 uodn 'p NOIZOdS
'pzTUA paaapzsuoo aq o4 sT not;aod c�uTuz-ewaa aqj `ptTUAu
paatToap sz aou-Cuzpao szu; To not;aod Aue 11 E NOIZOdS
•aTdoad au
10 a;oA U Aq ATuo papuaw-c aq Auw aouUuzpao STgl 'Z NOIZOdS
•sasod
puulga-ed puu aoeds uado aol saz4aadoad Toouos ssaoxa aTgleTzt'AU
10 4uawanoadwz puE aou-eua4uzuw `uozq-zsznboe aq4 `pied ST ssaupa
-;gapuz papuoq aq4 uaum `puooas `pu-e `.Alem-10-4gfTa p�eoaTTVa aq4 pUB
014a11aUd mazAUaS aq4 `04Ts ToogoS ggnoS aq4 aaTnbou pTnom 401alsz
uoTgm `T 'ON q-ozaq-stQ S@T4TTz3'cd A4zunwwoO 10 Juaw40-eua aqq woaj
2uzI-Tnsaa ssauplgapuz papuoq Aut aonpaa o; ;saTj pasn aq TT�cus
`anuanaa TTO spu-eTapzy Aq pao'eTdaa sz 4ug4 Aauow puna TuaauaO TTV
q-aaa4S u49 puU aAzaQ A@TT'eA To aauaoo ag; 4-e pa4le0oT sz patS uozum
`paUA a0uUu04uTuw A;zO ;uosoad agq- ;U aZzs ut aaole auo poaoxa 01
;OU a;zs -G woal paTTzap sTTam `OT -TZ uoz;oaS stq; To uoz;TgTgoad
aq4 woal pa4daoxa aq osTu TTugs aaaq, •(-e)„ :smoTTol s -e TTnj ut
puaa oq- gdua�uaud mau u `suoTjdaoxH `pa;zgzgoad sTTaNI TTO `OT -TZ
uoT4oaS apoO T-edzozunW o4 pappe aq TTtgs aaagy 'T NOIZOdS
:smoTTOT su uz�epao op go-eag usowaaH To A;zO auq- To aTdoad aqs
85G-�8 ON HDNVNIQHO ONIGHSHddnS 'SQNvZ
QdNmO AZIO NIVZHHD Ioua SvO QNV ZIO 30 ZNHHHHnOOHd dHs Hod MO77v
OZ SggHA UO ZSNIVOV NOIZIHIHOHd dHs ONIQNHWV ZIONnOO AZIO dHz Ag
SHHIOA dHs OZ GHIIINUaS HOVdg VSOWUaH d0 AZIO dHs d0 HDNVNIQHO NV
85L -P8 'ON dONVNIQHO
8z;
LZ
9z;
8Z
Z9
I9
WO
6
8
L
9
9
f
I
CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
(Oil Drilling - City Maintenance Yard)
This ordinance is placed on the ballot by the City Council
and would allow the drilling of oil or gas wells from the
site of the present City Maintenance Yard located at the
corner of Valley Drive and 6th Street.
Use of any revenue derived by the City from the site shall
be limited first to reduce any bonded indebtedness resulting
from the enactment of Community Facilities District No. 1,
which district would acquire the South School site, the
Seaview Parkette, and the railroad right-of-way; and, second,
when the bonded indebtedness is paid, for the acquisition,
maintenance and improvement of available excess school or
other properties for open space and parkland purposes.
The site could not be larger than one acre in size and
no wells drilled from the site could be bottomed within
the tidelands. The revenue from any such wells, then, would
not be subject to the restrictions on the use of tidelands
funds.
The proposed exceptions to the ban on oil wells are presented
as two ballot measures to allow the voter to act on them
separately. Both may pass, both may fail, or one or the other
may pass or fail.
7-12-84
July 30, 1984
City Council Meeting
July 30, 1984
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
BALLOT ARGUMENTS
SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION b
NOVEMBER 6, 1984 0
\ 3 SJR'
Recommendation:
Decide if you all wish to sign the ballot arguments (Oil drilling -
Maintenance Yard, Political Activities of Employees, Mello -Roos,
Oil drilling - South School Site - with School Board.) If so, review
argument in favor of Oil - MainteZncee Yard. Please review state-
ment "allows one oil well".
al.
Also attached is form to be filed by the Author of Argument; and
relevent sections of Elections Code. I have not set the date for
all arguments to be in because of Mello -Roos not being ready, but
please try to turn in as soon as possible. No later than August 10.
Kathleen Reviczky, City(71/ei4k
CONCUR:
Alana Mastrian, Assistant City Manager
O I L �' (>/"'I 5 st l
This measure allows one oil well,all revenues from which
would go first toward debt retirement for the Mello -Roos District
and secondly, after all debt is retired, toward maintenance of
�a The City Council is asking you to vote
for a measure that will provide a method to help pay the debt
service costs to acquire 25 acres of land for permanent open
space. Voting in favor of this measure will reduce the amount
required (from the taxpayers through property taxes) to buy the
railroad right-of-way, the South School site, and Seaview
Parkette.
If we want to insure that these lands will always remain as
permanent undeveloped open space and parklands, the City will have
to own them. If the City doesn't own them, it has to allow the
owners some development. When those lands are developed they
will no longer be the public open space and parklands we
want and need.
DeBellis/Brutsch
FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY AUTHOR OF ARGUMENT
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 5, Chapter 3
(beginning with Section 4000) of the Elections Code shall be accompanied by the
following form statement, to be signed by each author of the argument:
The undersigned author(s) of the argument ballot proposition at
(primary/rebuttal) (in favor of/against) (name or number)
the election for the to be held on hereby state that such argument is true and correct
(title of election) (jurisdiction) (date)
to the best of knowledge and belief.
(his/her -their)
Signed
Martin & Chapman Co. 20 Bixby Ro. Lakewood, CA 907124168 1213-426-2511
Date
Form K
WORD COUNT STANDARD FOR CANDIDATE'S STATEMENTS AND ARGUMENTS
Based on Western Union Domestic Nord Count with Common Sense Modifications
Candidate's Statements — 200 word limit
City Attorney's Impartial Analysis — 500 word limit
Direct Arguments — 300 word limit
Rebuttal Arguments — 250 word limit
The following are the guidelines for computing the word count:
1. The title and signatures are not counted - only the text is counted.
2. Punctuation and single characters ............ ..........free
.......................
3. Dictionary words .........................................................one
The words "a", "the", "and", "an" are counted as individual words.
4. Abbreviations ................................. one
Examples are UCLA, PTA, U.S.M.C., L.A.P.D.
S. Place names .................................... ...................orle
Examples are Los Angeles - I word New York - 1 word
Palos Verdes Estates - I word Cardiff by the Sea - 1 word
In general, all cities and towns preceded by "La" or "Los" are counted as 1 word.
6. Whole numbers:
Digits 0 or 10 or 100, etc.).................................................one
Spelled out (one or ten or one hundred) .......................... one for each word
7. Numeric combinations (1973. 13!!, 1971-73, 5%6) ................................one
8. Dates:
All digits (4/8/81) ............ I ......... one
Words and digits (April 8, 198 1) ........................................two
9. Monetary amounts (if the dollar sign is used with tigures - S 1,000.00) .................one
10. Hyphenated words ............................................ one for each word
unless the dictionary shows it as 1 word.
If the text exceeds the word limit, please ask the author to delete or change a sufficient number of
words, or a sentence, to put it within the required word limit.
The text is printed exactly as submitted. Only obvious misspellings are corrected, as ]on,(, as the
intended meaning of the author is not changed.
ELECTIONS CODE
natures affixed to the petition. If, from
it the number of signatures, prima facie,
amber of signatures required, the clerk
etition shall be deemed as filed on that
filed shall be void for all purposes.
erein provided, the clerk shall examine
-e county petitions in accordance with
to purposes of this section, references to
. as references to the legislative body of
e city clerk in the same manner as are
3756.
lance or order special election.
not less than 15 percent of the voters of
:'s official report of registration to the
the notice specified in Section 4002 was
-�s registered voters the signatures of 25
city, whichever is the lesser number, and
e submitted immediately to a vote of the
.ive body shall either:
alteration at the regular meeting at which
within 10 days after it is presented; or
:tion, to be held not less than 88 nor more
order, at which the ordinance, without
of the voters of the city.
submitted at next regular municipal
not less than 10 percent of the voters of
-k's official report of registration to the
e the notice specified in Section 4002 was
s registered voters by the signatures of 25
paid city, whichever is the lesser number,
t required to be, or for any reason is not,
ction, and is not passed without change by
without alteration, shall be submitted by
next regular municipal election occurring
,f the legislative body.
5-)
cer, with the veto power, when the passage
niers is vetoed, the failure of the legislative
veto shall be deemed a refusal of the
within the meaning of this article.
02
LECTIONS CODE 4015.5.
4013. Valid ordinance if majority.
" If a majority of the voters voting on a proposed ordinance vote in its favor, the
".Jordinance shall become a valid and binding ordinance of the city. The ordinance
shall be considered as adopted upon the date that the vote is declared by the
;legislative body, and shall go into effect 10 days after that date. No ordinance
roposed by initiative petition and adopted by the vote of the legislative body of
city without submission to the voters, or adopted b the vote shall be
n' P Y voters,
,=iepealed or amended except by a vote of the people, unless provision is otherwise
=' made in the original ordinance.
(Added by Stats. 1976, c. 248, §3.)
-R�
4014. More than one ordinance at same election.
number of proposed ordinances may be voted upon at the same election,
;abut the same subject matter shall not be voted upon twice within any 12 -month
. period at a special election under the provisions of this article.
at ;.(Added by Stats. 1976, c. 248, §3.)
'r'y01 Arguments for and against ordinance.
The persons filing an initiative petition pursuant to this article may file a
written argument in favor of the ordinance, and the legislative body submit
an argument against the ordinance. Neither argument shall excee 300 ords in
length, and both arguments shall be printed upon the same sheet o paper and
mailed to each voter with the sample ballot for the election.
The following statement shall be printed on the front cover, or if none, on the
heading of the first page, of the printed arguments:
"Arguments in support of or in opposition to the proposed laws are the opinions
.v. of the authors."
Printed arguments submitted to voters in accordance with this section shall be
k -titled either "Argument In Favor Of Measure " or "Argument Against
t,
re -7 accordingly; the blank spaces being filled in only with the
nes'letter or number, if any, which designates the measure. At the discretion of the
erk, the word "Proposition" may be substituted for the word "Measure" in such
titles Words used in the title shall not be counted when determining the length
of any argument.
�f# ::(Amended by Stats. 1977, c. 297, §4.)
4115.5 Rebuttal arguments.
(a) If the legislative body submits an argument against the ordinance, it shall
-' ediately send copies of the argument to the persons filing the initiative
zap;'petition. The persons filing the initiative petition may prepare and submit a
_-rebuttal argument not exceeding 250 words. The legislative body may prepare and
-submit a rebuttal to the argument in favor of the ordinance not exceeding 250
words. The rebuttal reguments shall be filed with the clerk not more than 10 days
`` =mer the final date for filing direct arguments. Rebuttal arguments shall be
'•.; printed in the same manner as the direct arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall
Immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut.
'-(b) The provisions of subdivision (a) shall only apply if, not later than the day
.on which the legislative body calls an election, the legislative body, by a majority
`3 "-note. adopts its provision; in which case, the provisions of subdivision (a) shall
aPP1y at the next ensuing municipal election and at each municipal election
t
103
4091. ELECTIONS CODE
4091. Examination of petition.
After the petition has been filed, the clerk shall examine the petition in the
same manner as are county petitions in accordance with Sections 3707 and 3708,
except that, for the purposes of this section, references in those sections to the
board of supervisors shall be treated as references to the legislative body of the
city or city and county. The expenses of signature verification shall be provided
by the governing body receiving the petition from the clerk.
(Added by Stats. 1981, e. 136, §11.)
4092. Preservation and destruction of petition:
The petition shall be preserved and destroyed in accordance with the
provisions of Section 3756.
(Added by Stats. 1981, c. 136, §12.)
4093. Petitions not accepted.
Petitions which do not substantially conform to the form requirements of this
article shall not be accepted for filing by the clerk.
(Added by Stats. 1981, c. 136, §13.)
Article 4. Arguments Concerning City Measures
a.
O1 "City measure" definition. '
As used in this article, "city measure" includes any proposed city charter, any
proposed amendment to a city charter, any proposition for the issuance of bonds
by the city, any advisory question, or any other question or proposition submitted
to the voters of a city.
(Amended by Stats. 1976, c. 916, §2.)
5011 City attorney to prepare impartial' analysis.
Whenever any city measure qualifies for a place on the ballot, the governing
body may direct the city clerk to transmit a copy of the measure to the city -
attorney, unless the organization or salaries of the office of the city attorney are
affected. The city attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure ->
showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the operation of the
measure. If the measure affects the organization or salaries of the office of the
city attorney, the governing board may direct the city clerk to prepare the '-
impartial analysis. The analysis shall be printed preceding the arguments for and
against the measurd. The analysis shall not exceed 500 words in length.
�(Added by Stats. 1976, c. 248, §3.)
If not otherwise provided, voters may submit arguments.
If there is no other method provided by general law, or, in the case of a
ELECTIONS CODE
5013. Written arguments.
The legislative body, or any mems
authorized by that body, or any indivi
measure, or bona fide association of c
a_sociations, may file a written argurr
argument shall exceed 300 words in len,
for and an argument against the meas,
statement on the front cover, or if nor
printed arguments:
"Arguments in support or oppositioi
the authors."
The city clerk shall enclose a printer
ballot; provided, that only those argurr
printed and enclosed with the sample
matter" within the meaning of those
Printed arguments submitted to vot
titled either "Argument In Favor Of M
Measure ," accordingly, th
letter or number, if any, which design
clerk, the word "Proposition" may be
titles. Words used in the title shall nc
of any argument.
(Amended by Stats. 1983, C. 812, §
5014. Argument not accepted •} : tb
A ballot argument shall not be .:cct
by the name or names of the pe; .,)n
behalf of an organization, the m .ie c
one of its principal officers.
No more than five signature-- hall
this article. In case any argu .-,.ent
signatures of the first five shai:. be p
(Added by Stats. 1976, c. 24•-. §3.11'
5014.1. Argument not accepted w
text_
A ballot argument or, if applicabl
text the name of a person, other
represented as being for or against
argument is accompanied by a sign
person, other than an individual, s
authorized representative. "Person"
partnership, corporation, associatic
other organization or group of pers4
(Added by Stats. 1978, c. 172, §3.
chartered city, by the charter or by city ordinance, arguments for and against any 5014.5. Rebuttal arguments.
city measure may be submitted to the qualified voters of the city pursuant to this (a) It any person submits an argu
article. If a method is otherwise provided by general law, or, in the case of a has been filed in favor of the cit}
chartered city, by charter or city ordinance, for submitting arguments as to a copies of that argument to the per
particular kind of city measure, that method shall control. ,4 measure. The persons filing the r
(Added by Slats. 1976, c. 248, §3.) prepare and submit a rebuttal argu:
am
ELECTIONS CODE
iy
'jI`EkTIONS CODE 5014.5.
ie clerk shall examine the petition in the
�' 501 Written arguments.
i accordance with Sections 3107 and 3708,
.11 =1 The legislative body, or any member or members of the legislative body
cion, references in those sections to the
authorized by that body, or any individual voter who is eligible to vote on the
references to the legislative body of the
" measure, or bona fide association of citizens, or any combination of voters and
f signature verification shall be provided
'rations, may file a written argument for or against any city measure. No
tition from the clerk.
;argument shall exceed 300 words in length. The city clerk shall cause an argument
n , for and an argument against the measure to be printed along with the following
on the front cover, if
;statement or none, on the heading of the first page, of the
A petition.
anted arguments: ,.
�=4"Arguments in support or opposition of the proposed laws are the opinions of
-nd destroyed in accordance with the
the authors."
a t" The city clerk shall enclose a printed copy of both arguments with each sample
>;ballot; provided, that only those arguments filed pursuant to this section shall be
zs printed and enclosed with the sample ballot. The printed arguments are `official
', ; matter" within the meaning of those words used in Section 10010.
onform to the form requirements of this'
nted arguments submitted to voters in accordance with this section shall be
r 2> titled either "Argument In Favor Of Measure " "Argument
y the clerk.
7 ': or Against
Measure __," accordingly, the blank spaces being filled in only with the
¢�= letter or number, if any, which designates the measure. At the discretion of the
-clerk, the word "Proposition" may be substituted for the word "Measure" in such
kerning City Measures
` �:aitles. Words used in the title shall not be counted when determining the length
any argument.
(Amended by Stats. 1983, c. 812, §6.5.)
includes any proposed city charter, any
5014. Argument not accepted without names.
1Y proposition for the issuance of bonds
ballot
other question or proposition submitted
argument shall
���. b g not be accepted under this article unless accompanied
_ry y the name or names of the person or persons submitting it, or, if submitted on
,.behalf of an organization, the name of the organization and the name of at least
:one of its
'al analysis.
principal officers.
7tt ' •No more than five signatures shall appear with any argument submitted under
this article. In case any argument is signed by more than five persons the
or a place on the ballot, the governing
signatures of the first five shall be printed.
j=(Added
:ut a copy of the measure to the city
's
by Stag 1976, c. 248, §3:)
of the office of the city attorney are
s impartial analysis t the
•"5014.1 Argument not accepted without consent from person included in
measure
existing law and the operation of the
,
lization or salaries of the office of the
A ballot argument or, if applicable, a rebuttal argument which includes in its
direct the city clerk to prepare the
f f,rtext the name of a person, other than the author of the argument, who is
inted preceding the arguments for andx;Fq4
represented as being for or against a measure, shall not be accepted unless the
t exceed 500 words in length,
1, `:A argument is accompanied by a signed consent of such person. The consent of a
4 erson, other than an individual, shall be signed by an officer or other duly
s. authorized representative. "Person" as used in this section means any individual,
may submit arguments.
_
'-Pa rtnership, corporation, association, committee, labor organization, and any
other organization or group of
5Y general law, or, in the case of aAdded
Y persons.
by Stats. 1978, c. 172, §3.)
.nance, arguments for and against any
Pied voters of the city
;5014.5 Rebuttal arguments.
pursuant to this
by general law, or, in the case of a
.e, for submitting arguments to
a) It any person submits an argument against a city measure, and an argument
-has been filed in favor
as a5
d shall control.
of the city measure, the clerk shall immediately send
ecopies of that argument to the persons filing the argument in favor the
of city
' measure. The persons filing the argument in favor of the city measure may
A#1 .:,prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not exceeding 250 words. The clerk shall
5014.5. ELECTIONS CODE '`±;
ELECTIONS CODE
send copies of the argument in favor of the measure to the persons filing the ':3
The provisions of this section shall onl
of this section a:
argument against the city measure, who may prepare and submit a rebuttal to the
adopts the provisions
approves of the procedure.
argument in favor of the city measure not exceeding 250 words. The rebuttal >,'
election
by Stats. 1978, c. 1279, §2.)
arguments shall be filed with the clerk not more than 10 days after the final date
(Added
for filing direct arguments. Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same
Article 6. Publ:
manner as the direct arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall immediately
follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut.
5025. Public examination of argume
(b) The provisions of subdivision (a) shall only apply if, not later than the day
on which the legislative body calls an election, the legislative body, by a majority
Not less than 10 -calendar days befoi
vote, adopts its -provisions; in which case, the provisions of subdivision (a) shall
t
materials referred to in Sections 4015,
apply at the next ensuing municipal election and at each municipal election
for printing, the clerk shall make a co
thereafter, unless later repealed by the legislative body in accord with the
examination in the clerk's office. Any pE
procedures of this subdivision.from
the clerk for use outside of the cl
(Added by Stats. 1977, c. 701, §2.)
to any person obtaining a copy of the
by the clerk in prc
actual cost incurred
5015. Final date for arguments.
G3
During the 10 -calendar -day examin,'
voter of the jurisdiction in which the el
Based on the time reasonably necessary to prepare and print the arguments
or herself, may seek a writ of mandate
and sample ballots and to permit the 10 -calendar -day public examination as
z,:
d deleted
materials to be amendey
provided in Article 6 (commencing with Section 5025) for the particular election,
injunction shall be issued only upon cle
the city clerk shall fix and determine a reasonable date prior to the election afteru
in question is false, misleading or in
which no arguments for or against any city measure may be submitted for printing
=. _ j
chapter, and that issuance of the writ
and distribution to the voters as provided in this article. Arguments may be
with the printing or distribution of offi(
changed or withdrawn by their proponents. until and including the date fixed by
The clerk shall be named as responder
the city clerk.
the material in question shall be name
(Amended by Stats. 1981, c. 1114, §I0.)
the clerk bringing the mandamus or it
the county shall be named as the re
5016. Clerk to select if more than one argument.
r
authored the material in question sha
If more than one argument for or more than one argument against any city
t
(Amended by Stats. 1981, C. 1114,
measure is submitted to the city clerk within the time prescribed, the city clerk
Chapter 4. L
shall select one of the arguments in favor and one of the arguments against the
measure for printing and distribution to the voters. In selecting the argument the
city clerk shall give preference and priority in the order named to the arguments"
-
Article
of the following:
(a) The legislative body, or member or members of the legislative body
x `
5150. Scope of article.
authorized by that body.
In addition to any other method pi
(b) The individual voter or bona fide association of citizens, or combination of
by any district pursuant to this articl
voters and associations, who are the bona fide sponsors or proponents of the
shall not apply to irrigation districts,
measure.not
provide a procedure for elections,
(c) Bona fide associations of citizens.
not provide for action by ordinan(
(d) Individual voters who are eligible to vote on the measure.
procedure which permits voters, in e
cast more than one vote per voter,
(Amended by Stats. 1983, c. 812, §7.) -
empowered to cast more than one v(
(Added by Stats. 1976, c. 248, §3.)
Article 5. Mailings
5020. One copy of official material per household.
a
5151. "District" definition.
For the purposes of initiative an
Whenever the clerk is required to mail official matter, as provided in Sections
includes any regional agency which
4015, 4015.5, 4018, 5011, 5012, 5013, and 5014.5, only one copy of each such official
to condemn and purchase land.
matter shall be mailed to a postal address where two or more registered voters
(Added by Stats. 1976, c. 248, §3.
have the same surname and the same postal address.
ELECTIONS CODE�Zw` °'
CODE
if the measure to the �h
$LECT]ONS
persons filing 5151.
nay prepare and submit a rebuttal to the ,���
��,�>e provisions of this section shall onlyapply
not exceeding 250 words. The rebuttal dopts. the, provisions of this section and .theelection Official condu ting the
)t more than 10 days after the final date deletion a
"guments shall be printed in the same
�8 PProves of the procedure.
rebuttal ar "�°iAdded by Stats 1978, c. 1279,.§2,)
gement shall immediately
S to rebut; ,.
call onlyy Article 6. Public Examination
aPPI if, not later than the day t !�
[ion, the legislative bod �b0 Public examination of arguments, ordinance and a
the provisions of subdivision majority
ction and at each i) shall � Not less than 10 -calendar days before the clerk submits the Official
'
municipal election, materials referred to in Sections 4015, 4015.5, 4018, 5011, 5012, 5013 an
legislative body in accord with thef� ,for —Printing,a official election
the clerk shall make a co d 5014.5
xr�Z .examination in the clerk's office. An PY of such material available for public
Y person may obtain a co
the clerk for use outside of the clerk's office. The clerk may charge a f
py of such materials
ee
person obtaining a COPY of the material, which fee shall not exceed the
�4 actual cost incurred by the clerk in Providingthe c
to prepare and print the arguments 7�Dg the 10 -calendar -day copy..
calendar -da ���voter of the jurisdiction in which the on on is�being held, rthe cler
Y public examination asod Y this section, any
'tion 5025) for the particular election,Ar,herself, may seek a writ of mandate or an injunction requiring enable date prior to the election after�naterials to be amended or deleted. A 1 himself
easure may be submitted for printing-afinjunction shall be issued only u Perem to q g any or all such
P ry writ of mandate or an
in this article. Arguments in question is false, misleadingupon clear and convincing proof that the material
intil and includingmay be R chapter, and that issuance of the writ or io in nconsistent with
1 not substantially of this
the date fixed by
with the printing or distribution of official election materials as provided by law.
x ;The clerk shall be named as respondent and the person or official v Y interfere
the material in question shall be named as real parties in interest. In the
;ument, who authored
;the clerk bringing the mandamus or injuctive action, the board of supervisors
the -county shall be named case of
ham one argument against any the material in as the respondent and the P isors of
the time r Y city question shall be named as the real person
Official who
prescribed, the city clerk (Amended by Stats 1981, C. 1114,
3 one of the arguments against the . §ll.) party interest.
tens. In selectingF
the argument the r
the order named to the arguments ' 'Chapter 4. District Elections
members of the legislative body Article 1. Initiative
i $150. Scope of article.
tion of citizens, or combination of � � 't •
:e sponsors p P ;' In addition to any other method provided by law, ordinances may be enacted
or ro omenta ti the s -sob an
. x Y Y district pursuant to this article, except that the provisions of this article
.shall not apply to irrigation districts, to a district formed under a law which does
ro not provide a procedure for elections, to a district forme
on the measure. � :not provide for action by ordinance, to a district d under a law which does
procedure which permits voters, in electing the district's dire tors or trustees
"J -Cast more than one vote per voter, or to a district in which the directors arned by an re to
3s i.empowered to cast more than one vote per director when acting on any matter.
hold. - _
(Added by Stats 1976, c. 248, §3) e
rr :.
matter, as provided .5151
in Sections T "District" definition.
'
y one copy of each such official ^ For the purposes of initiative and referendum under this chapter,
two or more registered voters , Includes any regional agency which has the
rens_:: to condemn and purchase land. Power to tax, to regulate land use, or
(Added by Stats 1976, c. 248,
113
July 3, 1984
' d1 9 A2
Ms. Pamela Sapetto
Director of Planning and Environmental Services
Civic Center
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Subject: Downtown Area Policy Plan Work Program
Dear Ms. Sapetto:
We are pleased to submit this work program to prepare a Policy Plan for
the Downtown Area of Hermosa Beach. This program is based upon the
necessary elements to be covered by such a study; identified in our cor-
respondence of June 8, 1984.
The purpose of preparing a Policy Plan is essentially two -fold:
to establish development and design criteria which will regulate
development in the Downtown Area in the immediate future; and,
to establish a strategic action program which the City may then
use to leverage funds for improvements (public and private) to the
Downtown Area.
A singularly -important product of the Policy Plan will be preparation of a
logical sequence of improvements, and their prioritization. Typically,
cities use these programs to procure additional "outside" funding as well
as to establish incentives for private investment.
Funds for improvements such as envisioned for the Downtown Area are
available through the State Coastal Conservancy. While there is con-
siderable competition for available monies, the interests of the City in
its improvements are very similar to those of the Conservancy in its Urban
Waterfronts Program. A number of coastal communities today are receiving
funding for precisely what Hermosa Beach wishes to accomplish.
PLANNING • ARCHITECTURE • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
18012 SKY PARK CIRCLE • IRVINE, CA 92714 • (714) 261-8820 CALIFORNIA COLORADO HAWAII
Ms. Pamela Sapetto
July 3, 1984
Page 2
This Policy Plan should be viewed as a very important "Phase I"
direction -setting and prioritization effort. Its products will outline
the actions the City determines necessary for improving the Downtown.
These subsequent actions, and the accompanying detailed analyses/plans may
then be implemented by the continued efforts of the City in cooperation
with other agencies, property owners and residents and the investment
community.
Should you have any questions or comments on the attached Work Program
please do not hesitate to call. We look forward to refining it with you
and to initiating work in the very near future. As previously mentioned,
we would see delivery of the draft Policy Plan and all related
documentation to the City within approximately four weeks.
Very truly yours,
PHILLIPS BRANDT REDDICK
��*IFA3 UA
James Fergus
Associate
JF/2FA
July 7, 1984
HERMOSA BEACH DOWNTOWN STUDY
WORK PROGRAM
Task 1. Conduct Background Studies and Research
with City assistance and City information assembled to date)
A. Prepare base map(s) at appropriate scale(s).
B. Prepare ownership map.
C. Prepare land use map (lot by lot).
D. Inventory parking spaces: On -street and off-street.
E. Identify development projects: Underway and pending.
F. Identify existing and proposed public improvements (infrastructure,
streetscape, other).
G. Review documents and studies: LCP, General Plan, Zoning, special
studies, economic reports, project reports, EIR's.
Task 2. Prepare Land Use Plan
A. Prepare Land Use Plan including the following information:
1) Land plan indicating development areas, land use assignments, and
intensities.
2) Relationships between land uses.
3 Building areas, parking areas, and access to downtown uses.
4) Plazas.
5) Circulation hierarchy, including pedestrian.
B. Prepare Statistic Summary, including square footage yields.
Task 3. Prepare Urban Design Criteria
A. Prepare general architectural design criteria, including:
1) Overall architectural characters of the Downtown.
2) Building forms and massing (sketch form).
3) Building materials and colors (acceptable ranges).
B. Prepare general landscape architectural criteria, including:
1) Landscape concept for Downtown.
2) Entry points (from Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue).
3) Streetscapes (medians, parkways, sidewalks, textured paving,
planters).
4) Parking areas/structures (recommended treatments).
5) Plaza/courtyard areas.
6) Plant palette (acceptable ranges: primarily for costing purposes).
1
C. Prepare development regulations, including:
1) Building heights.
2) Building setbacks and coverage.
3) Building massing.
Other regulations may also be included as determined in consultation
with City staff and through review of the existing zoning ordinance.
Task 4. Analyze Circulation and Parking
A. Provide an overview of existing/available parking in the Downtown
Area: on- and off-street.
B. Calculate demand, on a general basis, based upon land use plan and
including existing demand, with beach parking (overview).
C. Review joint -use parking alternatives (overview).
D. Review circulation system included in Land Use Plan.
Task 5. Prepare Marketing Input
A. Provide overview of market demand focusing upon visitor-serving/local-
serving uses in Hermosa Beach and South Bay Area, based upon existing
and available reports.
B. Review Land Use Plan for appropriate balance between land uses.
Optional Task
If the City so desires a Preliminary Economic Analysis of the Downtown
Area can be prepared. Focusing upon visitor -serving and local serving
commercial uses the analysis will identify and evaluate circulation (auto
and non -vehicular), proximity to the ocean, views and visibility, and
other locational and improvement characteristics affecting development
potential of downtown area. We will review socioeconomic data and
competitive land uses which will influence market supply and demand of the
above commercial uses. The realistic potential for development of
commercial and office uses will be estimated. Demand (in square feet),
potential absorption, and future market values by land use type will be
estimated.
Cost estimate for optional task: $7,000.00-$10,000.00
Task 6. Prepare Improvement Costs
A. Prepare rough -estimate cost analysis for the following improvements
with City Engineer:
1) Water, sewer, drainage.
2) Public improvements to: medians, planters, street trees and other
plant materials, plaza areas, special accent areas.
3) Acquisition costs associated with lot consolidation opportunities.
Costs provided will be on an "order of magnitude" basis, but will be
sufficient for purposes of evaluating a strategic action program.
2
Task 7. Prepare Implementation Program
A. Prepare aggregation study; determine the opportunity, by parcel size
and configuration, for owner participation/public intervention.
B. Array costs into priority areas for implementation, in consultation
with City staff, and utilizing, in a general fashion, the following
evaluation criteria:
1) Public-private investment leveraging potential.
2) Economic returns to the City, and appropriate timeframes.
3) Achievement of "social" purpose (City image, jobs, secondary
benefits).
4) Project feasibility/proforma analysis (overview).
C. Establish priorities: Take previously determined public improvements,
ownership patterns, project activities and the available cost
estimates, and in consultation with the City recommend priorities for
public improvements.
Task 8. Prepare Policy Plan
A. Prepare Policy Plan meeting City objectives and including:
1 Project Description
2 Urban Design Criteria
3) Implementation Program, with action items including but not
limited to:
a) subsequent zoning amendments (development standards).
b) Policy Plan recommendations for seeking funding.
c) lot consolidation opportunities.
d) incentive programs for private investments.
e) detailed design plans and analyses necessary for improvements.
Task 9. Conduct Meetings and Presentations
A. Meet with Coastal Conservancy.
1) Initiate meetings with staff/decision makers to determine funding
opportunities and responsibilities.
2) Present plans, costs, priority areas for Conservancy assistance.
B. Conduct/attend the following City meetings:
1) two public workshops
2) two Planning Commission hearings
3) two City Council hearings
3
SUMMARY OF COSTS
Task Cost Estimate
1. Background/Research $ 1,500.00
2. Land Use Plan 2,500.00
3. Urban Design Criteria 3,000.00
4. Marketing Input 1,500.00
5. Circulation and Parking 2,000.00
6. Improvement Costs 2,000.00
7. Implementation 2,500.00
8. Policy Plan 2,000.00
9. Meetings/Presentations 3,000.00
10. Reimbursable/Printing Costs 3,000.00
TOTAL COST ESTIMATE $ 23,000.00
4
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of
the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Thursday, June 28th,
1984 at the hour of 7:30 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilman DeBellis
PnT.T. PAT.T.
Present - Barks, Cioffi, Mayor Brutsch
Absent - DeBellis, Wood
The meeting was recessed at 7:40 P.M. to Hermosa Valley Middle School.
The meeting reconvened at 7:50 P.M.
Present - Barks, Cioffi, DeBellis, Wood, Mayor Brutsch
The meeting was called to order by Leslie White of the Hermosa Beach
School Board with members Gale, Reznichek, and O'Brien also present.
Mr. Wood left the meeting at 9:05 P.M.
COUNCIL ACTION - Invite School Board to join City in a Joint Powers
Agreement for the purpose of acquiring open space and school facilities.
Motion DeBellis, second Mayor Brutsch
AYES - Barks, Cioffi, DeBellis, Mayor Brutsch
NOES - None
ABSENT - Wood
COUNCIL ACTION - To put on the Nov. 84 ballot Mello Roos dealing with
acquisition of open space, school facilities, and railroad right-of-
way.
Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Cioffi
AYES - Barks, Cioffi, DeBellis, Mayor Brutsch
NOES - None
ABSENT - Wood
COUNCIL ACTION - Initiate process of rezoning of 13 lots at South
School afronting Monterey Blvd. to R-3 contingent upon the failure
of Mello Roos measure.
Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Barks
AYES - Barks, Cioffi, DeBellis, Mayor Brutsch
NOES - None
ABSENT - Wood
COUNCIL ACTION - Exception to ban on oil drilling for South School
site so that oil drilling would be allowed there if Mello Roos fails.
Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Barks
AYES - Barks, Cioffi, DeBellis, Mayor Brutsch
NOES - None
ABSENT - Wood
All four moticn5 were presented to the School Board.
SCHOOL BOARD ACTION - To accept the Joint Powers Agreement which
allows the City to purchase for 3.5 million dollars all of the South
School site and Seaview Parkette and which allows the District to
remodel and make additions to Hermosa Valley School with a line of
credit or means to begin construction immediately, with the previous
deed restrictions, and including the contingency that the City Council
rezone .87 acres of South School (built-up portion bordering Montere
-1-
Minutes 6-28-84
Boulevard) to R-3 zoning, zone change to be completed within 90 days \
from this date to become effective only upon failure of the Mello -
Roos initiative on the Nov. ballot; subject to legal advice.
Motion Reznichek, second Gale.
SCHOOL BOARD ACTION - To amend the motion to include the retention
by the School District of the mineral rights for the entire South
School site and that the reversionary rights be applied only to the
easterly 4.51 acres.
Motion Reznichek, second O'Brien.
AYES - Gale, O'Brien, Reznichek, Chairman White
NOES - None
COUNCIL ACTION - Accept offer made by School Board.
Motion Barks, second Mayor Brutsch
AYES - Barks, Cioffi, DeBellis, Mayor Brutsch
NOES - None
ABSENT - Wood
Council recessed at 11:45 P.M. to the Council Chambers at City Hall.
The meeting reconvened at 11:55 P.M.
COUNCIL ACTION - To have an adjourned regular meeting Thursday,
July 5th, 1984 at 6:30 P.M. for the purpose of beginning the process
of putting Mello -Roos on the ballot. Also, to appropriate $30,0000
for the process to be reimbursed by the proposed District.
Motion DeBellis, second Barks. So ordered by the Chair.
ADJOURNMENT - The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach, on a motion by the Chair, adjourned at 11:58 P.M.
to a Adjourned Regular Meeting on July.5th, 1984 at the hour of
6:30 P.M.
-2- Minutes 6-28-84
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of
the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Thursday, July 5, 1984
in the Council Chamber, City Hall at the hour of 6:30 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -
ROLL CALL
City Manager Meyer
Present: Barks, Cioffi, DeBellis, Mayor Brutsch
Absent: Wood
1. SOUTH BAY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROGRAM FUNDING.
Memorandum from Mayor Pro Tem George Barks dated June 28, 1984.
City Manager Gregory T. Meyer presented the staff report noting
that should the staff recommendation to award a grant of
$22,000 to the District be approved, these monies would have to
be appropriated from the Prospective Expenditures Fund as this
is not a budgeted item.
Mayor Pro Tem Barks was questioned by Council regarding the
differential between the shortfall of $92,000 (83-84) and the School
District's request for $193,000. Mr. Barks indicated that certain
income (transportation and uniform costs borne partially by
students) was not shown on this cost analysis. When questioned
re the method of repayment if a grant was approved, Mr. Barks
stated that this was to be determined by the City Managers of
the three South Bay cities involved along with their finance
departments.
PROPOSED ACTION - To direct the City Attorney to prepare a
contract with the South Bay Union High School District in which
the City will award a grant of $22,000 to the District to
partially fund all co -curricular activities for school year
84-85 only, to be repaid by June 30, 1986.
Motion Barks, second DeBellis
AYES - Barks, DeBellis
NOES - Cioffi, Mayor Brutsch
Motion fails.
2. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO CREATE A CITY-WIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE MELLO-ROOS ACT OF 1982. Letter from
Pamela S. Swift to Douglas W. Ayres, MSI, dated June 27, 1984.
Supplemental information Memorandum from City Manager Gregory T.
Meyer dated July 5, 1984.
City Manager Meyer presented the staff report. Councilman DeBellis
questioned the $145 per dwelling unit for 30 years, this being
a higher figure that originally discussed. Mr. Meyer stated that
this figure assumes no additional income to affect the debt.
Mr. Roy Stephenson of Berryman & Stephenson, Inc, assessment
engineer, answered questions of staff and Council regarding
the tax per dwelling unit. He stated that the $145 was the
maximum rate but that the actual rate would be approximately
$139 per dwelling unit. This number would be firmed up prior to
the public hearing.
1 Minutes 7-5-84 lu-
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION - COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (continued
Mr. Meyer responded to questions of Council regarding expenses
related to the issuance of the bonds. He stated that approximately
$500,000 would be needed for issuance expense $1.5 million which
would have to be set aside as debt service reserve. Both
of these are figured into the $13.5 million. Mr. Stephenson
advised that discounts of 15-25% could be given to multiple
units if that is the pleasure of the Council. If the bond issue
was apportioned equally to all residential and commercial
properties, a per parcel levy per year would be $213.
After lengthy Council discussion, the following actions were
taken.
(1) ACTION - To adopt the tax resolution stating the City's intention
to establish a Community Facilities District #1, authorizing annual
levy of a special tax, fixing a time and place of a public
hearing and amending exhibit A to reflect a per unit residential
cost of $126 plus or minus, and $.14 per square foot plus or
minus for commercial as follows: Resolution No. 84-4727 entitled
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, STATING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 1, AUTHORIZING THE ANNUAL LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX,
FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING."
Motion DeBellis, second Mayor Brutsch
AYES - DeBellis, Cioffi, Mayor Brutsch
NOES - Barks
ABSENT - Wood
(2) FURTHER ACTION - To adopt Resolution No. 84-4728 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS
IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $13,500,000 (THIRTEEN MILLION FIVE
HUNDRED THOUSAND) WITHIN PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
#1 OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE OF A
PUBLIC HEARING.
Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Barks
So ordered.
(3) Landscaping Maintenance District
ACTION - To table creation of the Landscaping Maintenance
District.
Motion DeBellis, second Mayor Brutsch
So ordered.
(4) South School Property/School District
ACTION - To direct City staff to meet with School District
personnel for the purpose of reporting back re what income
producing endeavors might jointly proceed regarding the
South School property - said report to be part of the July 24,
1984 agenda.
Motion Barks, second Mayor Brutsch
So ordered.
-2- Minutes 7-5-84
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION - COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (continued
(5) Railroad Right -of -Way
ACTION - To direct the City's AT&SF negotiator to consummate
an acquisition of the railroad right-of-way subject to passage
of Mello -Roos as authorized in the previous action.
Motion DeBellis, second Mayor Brutsch
So ordered.
3. BALLOT MEASURES FOR THE NOVEMBER, 1984 ELECTION
a. Amendment of Civil Service Ordinance re Political
Activities
City Attorney Post advised Council that this measure
had already been written
b. Landscaping Maintenance District
This item had been tabled by previous action of the City
Council.
C. Hydrocarbon Recovery
The staff report was presented by City Attorney Post who
stated that what is to be considered by the City Council is
the wording on two exceptions to the oil drilling ban -
City Maintenance Yard and South School.
The school site oil issue would only become operative if
Mello -Roos and oil drilling at the Maintenance Yard failed.
Councilman Barks stated that this was not his understanding.
It was stated by a member of the audience (Karen Gale) that
the oil issue is to be separate from Mello -Roos. The
School District would have the mineral rights and the City
would own the property. Wilma Burt stated that the law
was unclear in that we have wells on the yard site and
the City could modernize without a vote of the people - only
extra drilling would require a vote of the people. It
must be limited to site specific or the people will never
approve the measure.
City Clerk Reviczky reported that the final motion accepted
by the School Board, pending legal opinion was as follows:
"To adopt the Joint Powers purchase for $3.5 million. The
City would give them a line of credit to begin their
construction; the School Board would maintain the mineral
rights; they would have reversion rights if the property
was not used as open space, exclusing the .87 acre built-up
area; that the rezoning of South School would begin
immediately western .87 acre to R-3 and completed within
90 days, contingent on the failure of Mello -Roos and they
amended the motion to include mineral rights on the entire
site."
-3- Minutes 7-5-84
HYDROCARBON RECOVERY BALLOT MEASURE (continued)
Karen Gale of the Hermosa Beach School Board stated that
the Board was under the impression that there would be
two separate ballot measures concerning oil drilling -
one for drilling at the City Maintenance Yard and one
for drilling at South School.
City Clerk Reviczky advised that a motion had been generated
by the City Council to propose an exception to oil drilling
at South School if Mello -Roos failed. Council had agreed
and then the School Board had countered.
City Attorney Post stated that rezoning would begin and
become operative if Mello -Roos failed. He also advised
that the issue of oil drilling on the South School site
could be put on the ballot on behalf of the School District
without Council taking a position on the issue. The School
District, to put a measure on the ballot, would have to go
through a petition process which could not be done in a
timely fashion for the November election. Mr. Post stated
that oil drilling at South School could be made contingent
on the failure of Mello -Roos (drilling at the City Yard
site) .
After lengthy discussion, the following ordinance pertaining
to amending the prohibition against oil wells was approved
by Council with the addition as noted:
ACTION - To adopt
Ordinance No. 84-758 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS BY THE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING
THE PROHIBITION AGAINST OIL WELLS TO ALLOW FOR THE PROCURE-
MENT OF OIL AND GAS FROM CERTAIN CITY OWNED LANDS with the
addition of the following paragraph:
SECTION 1 - line 14
"A. The revenue derived by the City from this site
shall be used first to reduce any bonded indebtedness
resulting from the enactment of Community Facilities
District Number 1, which district would acquire the South
School site, the Seaview Parkette, and the railroad right-
of-way; and, second the acquisition, maintenance and
improvement of available excess school or other properties
for open space and parkland purposes."
Motion DeBellis, second Mayor Brutsch
So ordered.
FURTHER ACTION - To adopt Ordinance No. 84-759 - AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH SUBMITTED TO THE
VOTERS BY THE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE PROHIBITION AGAINST
OIL WELLS TO ALLOW FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF OIL AND GAS FROM
CERTAIN LANDS OWNED BY THE HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT
with the addition of the following:
-4- Minutes 7-5-84
HYDROCARBON RECOVERY BALLOT MEASURE (continued)
Line 13 - Add: "The revenue derived by the School District
from this site shall be used only for educational purposes."
Motion DeBellis, second Barks. So ordered.
d. Mello -Roos (discussed as item 2)
ACTION - To ask two members of the School Board and three
members of the City Council to write the argument in favor
of the Mello -Roos ballot measure.
Motion Cioffi, second Mayor Brutsch. So ordered
City Manager Meyer advised Council that the language for
the impartial analysis of the Mello -Roos measure would be
presented to Council on July 10.
Wilma Burt made a point of order requesting that Councilman Barks.
in his argument in favor of the Civil Service ballot measure, refer
to this measure as changing People's Ordinance NS 211.
e. People's Initiative re Open Space Lands
Councilman DeBellis will write the argument against this
People's Initiative. (Withdrawn by Councilman DeBellis.)
Councilman DeBellis asked for a reconsideration of agenda item #1 -
South Bay Union High School District Request for Funds. There being
no opposition the following actions were taken.
PROPOSED ACTION - To award a grant of $22,000 to South Bay Union High
School District to be repaid in one year at an interest rate of 100.
Motion DeBellis
SUBSTITUTE ACTION - To agree in concept to South Bay Union High
School District's grant of $22,000, the City Manager to return with
further details.
Motion Barks, second DeBellis
AYES - Barks, DeBellis
NOES - Cioffi, Mayor Brutsch
Motion fails
Prior to the vote on the above proposed substitute action, lengthy
discussion ensued. City Manager Meyer advised that repayment cannot
be demanded. Other devices are available to School Districts such as
fund raisers in the community by non-profit groups.
City Manager Meyer was requested to contact the Superintendent of
the South Bay Union High School District and share with him the
concerns of various Councilmembers and also consider in his final
recommendation to Council a possible interest rate.
Wilma Burt questioned the School District asking for $100,000, not
$190,000, the repayment question and felt that the City should not
bail out the District.
-5- Minutes 7-5-84
t8 -S -L SG-.nUTW
-W-d 00:9 qp uozssag
@ATgnoaxS pasoTD P Aq papaooad '0£:L go anon au4 4p P86T 'OT ATnr
'Appsans uo pTau aq oq buzqaaW aPTnbag P oq •W -d OZ:6 go anon auq qp
t86T 'S ATnr uo pauanoEPP sPm uoPag Psouiaag 90 AgT3 auq 90 TzounOD
AgTD auq 90 buz40aW aPTnbag pauanOEPV auk. 'JTPgD au4 Jo aapao auk up
lNawNunorav
t''`✓" TO: CAPT. V. STRASER, OPERATIONS DIVISION
,() FROM: SGT. GUY WALTERS, SUPERVISOR-TRAFFIC.DIVISION
SUBJECT: JAN/JUNE 1984 BI -ANNUAL REPORT
DATE: JULY 14, 1984 .
During the first six months of 1984, the Traffic Divsion was
plagued with equipment failures to both-_ motorcycles and radar
guns. The lack of both items severly affects the productivity
of our unit.
One of the most critical areas is in time spent assisting patrol.
Compared to 1983 Jan -June, we increased our patrol assist hours
by 221. Our total hours.for the six month period was,.582 or
661 days, which is approximately three and one-third months of
one traffic officer's time.
The Bureau as a total increased production in all catagories.
Below is a short re -cap comparing 1983/1984 Jan -June.
TOTAL
Citations
2830
+7-72
27%
Increase in
D.U.I.
94
+ 29
30%
productivity
�3
Arrests
371
+103
27%
Reports
246
+* 50
20%
Patrol Assists
532hrs
+221
41%
Cases Filed
109
+ 29
26%
The Bureau's average citations per day is 9.79.
SGT. UY WALTERS
SUPERVISOR -TRAFFIC DIVISION
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
GW/kh
MONT11- Jan. - June 1984
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC OFFICERS LOG
NOTES:
WALTERS
.WATTERS
DAYS WORKED
97
we
HRS/DAYS
446.4/55.8
337 / 46.27
111JV
TOTAL DAYS PER DAY
41.23 14.57
42.73 8.71
nl\1V :i 0 J. 0
PER DAY
tCC,YVl�'1'J
PER DAY
.37
.95
RICKEY 96 130.5/16.3 79.7 7,85 .22 ,87
e'HI ZMAR
BOIT.LIN 93 314 / 39.25 53.75 9.64 1..87 ��
CITATIONS
VEHICLES PEDESTRIANS
ARRESTS
VEHICULAR OTHER
REPORTS
OFFICER
SPEED
HZD
COMM
NON-HZD
TRAFFIC
MISC
TOTAL
DUI
OTHER
MISD
FELONY
WARR
MISD
FELONY
TOTAL
901
902
TOTAL
H
WALTERS
334
196
5
59
11
3
644
8
3
0
22
3
4
40
7
11
24
E
WATTERS
132
122
13
95
12
3
407
16
4
1
10
7
0
74
11
17
37
RICKEY
332
1441
2.
98
0
0
638
4..
4
3
7
4
2
24
38
45
111
CHIZMAR
184
192
8
116
13
31
570
42
15
2
32
33
5
129
18
20
44
E
BOHLIN
175
134
2
85
11
61
571
24
2
5
36
27
10
104
7
11
30
Paarrk�es
Parkers _11157
mi1mTT.
788
453
453
1011To LTi
47
Ti T1lT
145
TTTII
2830
94
28
11
107
174
21
371
81
104
246
3
NOTES:
WALTERS
.WATTERS
DAYS WORKED
97
we
HRS/DAYS
446.4/55.8
337 / 46.27
111JV
TOTAL DAYS PER DAY
41.23 14.57
42.73 8.71
nl\1V :i 0 J. 0
PER DAY
tCC,YVl�'1'J
PER DAY
.37
.95
RICKEY 96 130.5/16.3 79.7 7,85 .22 ,87
e'HI ZMAR
BOIT.LIN 93 314 / 39.25 53.75 9.64 1..87 ��
m
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC OFFICERS LOG
MONTH .JAN - JUNE 1984
OFFICER
H & R
INV
PKG
901A
902A
902NE
H&RA
HRIA
TRA
HRS
PATA
NRS
X I NG
GRD
SUPV
ADMIN
RANGE
HRS
TRAIN
HRS
IMPOUND
CT
SP
IN
WALTERS
9
hrs
36
24
hrs
8
hrs
10
2
9
hrs
131
95.5
0
239hr
0
31
0
0
2
WATTERS
16.5
30
8
10
18
2
1
72
79.5
Thr
62
184.5
77
5
2.5
10
RICKEY
2
62
0
1
0
0
0
3
51
16.5
20
0
4
44
30.5
8
CIiIZMAR
11
26
6
11
53
2
0
87.5
:.163
0
0
0
44
14
0
8
BOHLIN
3
103
6
7
23
5
2
126
143
0
0
0
44
14
0
8
TOTAL
41.5
257
44
37
104
111
12
149 .5
532
23.5
321
184.5
200
77
33
55
NOTES:- AG ES AND TOTALS
DAYS WORKED HOURS/DAYS TRAFFIC ENF DA
TOTAL 473. 155.6.4/199.55 274.41 48.95 634 3.61
AVERAGE 94.6 311.23/39.91 54.88
4
9.79 1.26
.72
MAY 1984
HERMOSA
BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY
TARGET CRIME TOTALS*
PREVIOUS
PREVIOUS
AREA 1
AREA 2
AREA 3
TOTALS
MONTH
% CHANCE
YEAR % CHANGE
459 RES
4
3
5
12
13
- 8%
25 - 52%
459 COMM
2
4
5
11
5
+120%
7 + 57%
459 VEH
3
5
0
8
5
+ 60%
4 +100%
211
2
0
0
2
5
- 60%
2 0%
SEX CRIMES
1
2
0
3
1
+200%
3 0%
TOTALS
12
14
10
36
29
+ 24%
41 - 12%
PREVIOUS
MONTH
11
8
10
29
% CHANGE
+ 9%
+ 75%
0%
+ 24%
PREVIOUS
YEAR
16
15
10
41
Ci�]POOP
% CHANGE
- 25%
- 7%
0%
- 12%
i
CPB�t1�0
_ * Figures based on
day of occurrence
Pu,00 flmm
'
CRIME ANALYSIS UNIT
4960f O 69ACN •MICl 00PA•
AOI OfAY •1111\i %- *O MACK CALNONWA
I11.. •1,
JUNE 1984
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY TARGET
CRIME TOTALS*
PREVIOUS
PREVIOUS
AREA 1
AREA 2
AREA 3
TOTALS
MONTH
% CHANGE
YEAR
% CHANGE
459 RES
2
5
1
8
12
- 33%
13
- 38%
459 COMM
9
2
2
13
11
+ 18%
6
+117%
459 VEH
4
4
0
8
8
O%
14
- 43%
211
1
0
1
2
2
0%
1
+100%
SEX CRIMES
0
0
1
1
3
- 67%
2
— 50%
TOTALS
16
11
5
32
36
— 11%
36
— 11%
PREVIOUS
MONTH
12
14
10
36
% CHANGE
+ 33%
— 21%
— 50% —
11%
PREVIOUS
YEAR
11
18
7
36
% CHANGE
+ 45%
- 39%
- 29% -
11 %
1
C�PO°Q
CPBGinIBG�IOO
ApG°�aGxa�nBo�
* Figures based on
day of occurrence
PmflPnm
` CRIME ANALYSIS UNIT
*1.0"O HAC. �011t[ DVAII
[1 DIAgOMO •fll[[i ..D—.a•[ACK CAI A
1111 •II
JAN FEB
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
RESIDENTIAL BURGLARIES
1982 - 1984
MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP
YR TO DATE TOTALS 8
X CHANCE AS OF 6/84
1982 - 119 ******
1983 - 91 (-24X)
1984 - 93 (+ 2%)
OCT NOV DEC
1982 1983 1984
CCAP 0/84
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITYWIDE CRIME STATISTICS
JUNE 1984
1 CRIMES REPORTED
PRIOR YEAR
JUNE 1983
10
PRIOR MONTH
MAY •8
Itiflllilflll
THIS MONTH
JUNE 1984
m
459 RES 459 COMM 459 VEH
CRIME TYPE
211
SEX CRIMES
CCAP 8/84
1,-
1:11 .11
►isirA
SWING
1600-0000
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITYWIDE CRIME STATISTICS BY SHIFT
JUNE 1984
15 CRIMES REPORTED
10
5
1
13
FIGURES BASED ON
DATE OF OCCURRENCE
vm
7� VIA
VIA
P
3 3 Il
Km
1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
459 RES 459 COMM 459 VEH 211 SEX CRIMES
CRIME TYPE
CLAP 8/84
20
PRIOR YEAR
JUNE 1983
15
PRIOR MONTH
MAY 1984
THIS MONTH
JUNE 1984
10
S
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITYWIDE CRIME STATISTICS BY AREA
JUNE 1984
TOTAL TARGET CRIMES REPORTED
AREA 1
16
AREA 2
PATROL AREA
7
FIGURES BASED ON
DATE OF OCCURRENCE
AREA 3
R
10
AREA 1
® 8
AREA 2
® 6
AREA 3 d
2
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITYWIDE CRIME STATISTICS - AREA COMPARISON BY CRIME TYPE
JUNE 1984
CRIMES REPORTED
9 FIGURES BASED ON
DATE OF OCCURRENCE
5
4 4
2 .2 2
1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0
459 RES 459 COMM 459 VEH 211
CRIME TYPE
t
SEX CRIMES
CCAP 6/84
45 CRIMES REPORTED
40
HERMOSA
BEACH 35
30
LASO
LAWNDALE
® 25
20
MANHATTAN
BEACH
15
• DODO it
BEACH
U
BEACH CITIES CRIME COMPARISON
JUNE 1984
459 RES 459 COMM 459 VEH 211 SEX CRIMES
CRIME TYPE
CLAP 6/84
ETECTIVE BUREAU MONTHLY REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING JULY 1984
otal Cases Assigned: 95 CLASS 1 27 CLASS 2 28 CLASS 3 40 YTD: 1 165 2; 198 3221 LYTD 1193 2113 3268
otal Felony Cases: 64 YTD 4 0 2 LYTD 132 Total Misdemeanor Cases: 31 YTD18 2 LYTD 3 4
otal Cases Cleared; By Complaint: Class 113* / 14 % Class 2 6 / 6 % Class 3'1 / 1 %
Other Means: Class 1 10 / ll —% Class 2 4' / 4 % Class 3 0 / 0' %
otal Cases Cleared by Complaint: YTD 101' LYTD 52 Total Cases Cleared by Other Means YTD 91 LYTD 36
DETECTIVE ARRESTS
otal Felony Arrests 4 YTD 34 LYTD 66 Total Warrant Arrests 1 YTD 7 LYTD 10
otal Misdemeanor Arrests 1 YTD 11 LYTD 12 Technical Bookings 0 YTD 7 LYTD 20
CASE DISPOSITIONS
r
BY COMPLAINT
otal Felony Cases Filed 9 / 14• $ YTD 78 LYTD 65 Total Misdemeanor Cases Filed a / 26 YTD 39 LYTD 46
otal Felony Cases Referred4 / 6 % YTD 12. LYTD 22 Total Misdemeanor Cases Rejected 7' / 23 %YTD 28 LYTD34
otal Felony Cases Rejected 2 / 3 % YTD 9LYTD 13 Total Misdemeanor Warrants 4 / 13 % YTD 9 LYTD 9
otal Felony Warrants 0 / 0 % YTD 7 LYTD_ 3 I
CASE DISPOSITIONS
BY OTHER MEANS
ases Inactivated 46 / 48 YTD 3 29 LYTD324 Cases Unfounded Q / 0 % YTD 9 LYTD 13
xceptional Clearance 0 / 0 $•YTD.7 LYTD 3 Unable to Prosecute 8 / 8 % YTD 42
COURT APPEARANCES
Other Agcy.
Referrals 1 / 1 $
LYTD17 YTD 23 LYTD 17
UPERIOR NO. OF CASES 0 YTD 11
LYTD 27
NO.
OF HOURS 0
YTD 43 LYTD 147. 5
UNICIPAL NO. OF CASES 8 YTD 6 2
LYTD 9 3
NO,
OF HOURS',_44,
YTD 292. YTD 269
t �
8
UVENILE NO. OF CASES 0 YTD 4
LYTD 2,
NO.
OF HOURS:..':
0 YTD 10! LYTD I y
• i
1 of
3
a
a
z
d
a
H
o
O
xv
cn
'rJ
C7
CJ
3
z
z
1
m
0
rr
O
K
(D
rt
n
rt
rt
rt
::;,
a
O
w
w
rt
a
O
C+
a
Cj
(D
r'
(D
0
CD
m
K
K
w
F' •
Cl
c1
r
p
(n
0
�
K
K
K
`<
O
0
(D
r•
u•
O
O
,
7
CD
cD
rt
rt
(D
rt
H.
K
0
a
>
>
E
7
K
0
CD
C
w
rt
r
rt
r -
O+
a
G1
<
G
-p
�
w
E
b
G
:5
0
n
A
Imo•
I
CD
z
(D
CD
K
a
K
m
(n
w
m
(n
ro
ro
D].
>
)II
CD
\
O
rr
(D
A+
a
rt
CJ
w
H
r,,
rn
n
'<
'<
K
a
(D
m
t7
K
r•
N
In
CD
(7
a
n
w
�
r
rr
ro
K
O
f•
<
a
r•
7
E
rt
m
:5
rt
rt
m
C
W
(D
>y
r•
N
m
(D
m
(D
O
1 -
O
CD
rt
r•
O'
(D
m
K
(n
(n
to
w
K
O
m
x
m
CD
II
m
m
op
co
Fl-
rr
N
G
rt
rt
r•
H
r-
m
K
a
tr
rt
O
0'
cn
CD
X.
n
(D
r•
O
(n
W
z
rr
rr
¢
F
W
CD
(n
►c
'7
r
0
Z
••
a
rt
<
m
m
rt
m
r
a
r-
}
(D
N
(D
In
a
K
H•
W
)-3
H
(n
A
r
(n
�'
(D
`J
Q.
p.
CD
:5
r
Cn
..
K
N
L<
I-
N
ED
O
N
W
a
(D
w
fat
O
CDF-'
a
rt
cn
y
aw
m
J
K
O
(D
N
J
C7
C7
N
(D
v
W
O
O
C•C
ti
C-'
H
C7
N
N
al
N
lD
al
J
do
da
d
d
w
r
r
K
K
K
y
E<
tC
H
IV
1-
N
W
N
*C
14
H
cL1
�
H
d
H
C.
H
d
L7
b
b
CzJ
\
r
d
0
H
d
I--'
N
li�;-
O
N
rn
H
to
r�
H
rt
H
H
t)
N
N
Cr1
t"
C�
K
N
I
F'
1D
W
N
1
i n
o
:.
d
w
Ln
oy
m
o
co
tv
H
H
''d
0
cn
r,
C:
W
cn
\
p
Do-
w
CD
C7
N
H
z
1
r
�rC
. <
W
n
lTJ
C.,
d
b
II.
to
'A
Fy-1
(A
n
K
r
H.
N
cn
H
C
w
H
CD
0
CD
A.
H
pt
r
n
n
~
((D
ri
U
m
m
1
H
M
m
O
O
b
_
o
*C
d
K
w
k<
(n
m
m
w
CD
rt
N
N
r
a
r-
m
m
(D
(D
z
K
z
ICD
rt
H.
N
CD
CD
n
F-'
rt
rt
y
t7
Ln
m
N'
CD
m
m
O
o
<
a.
0,
(n
I
mm
O
iC
N
K
O
O
m
CD
m
\
\
\
m
H
t7
O
~
�"'
K
C
a
w
O
O
O
Ni
Q+
m
O
H
y
yG
b
N
y
y
O
tZ
dP
dP
dP
►<
•e
K
y
r
o
Ul
-
w
d
d
C7
1-3
H
p
W
K
*<
O
O
''
t;
r
r
d
o
r
r
H
o
H
e
W
H
-33
d
N
H
H
co
O
C7
C7
,p
t7
d
K-3
ti
Ln
W
In
y
0
~
w
I N
I W
ZCw:�rw
xNawluvdaa 3oI'IOd IIDV39 vsowuall
HOSIAUSdnS NOISInIa 3nIZ33,L3a
NIAVq 'r ggVHOIw ZNVN31n3I'I
i
OT aux
b $ a3unnoo3x
xs�3aOHd 3nz�rn �tsos
S 8'£ L b
0 0' S Z Z 06 a,Lx'I
,+
i
r,
08L aL1C 06Z $
SW2IK32iI3
OOT -1
asx"
8`
�11
asx'I
$
SIIoos
TT GIA. 0 #
SWIDII13n HOSOw
T
asxII
0
0
asx
0! �`asxn
S
Ssaa' xoo.Lsania
0 9' 8 v T Z asx 006 t
SnOSNK'I'I3Os iw
9 6 .LT
a,LxII
0
O O L
a,Lx
i-
8 S b' OT asxz
S
Sa000 azollasnoii
6 S L a m, S
sxn3 g ONIiI,LO�IO
L Z b
asxz
0
0
asx
1
asxa
S
OaHZ.Ls' olaVx' �n,L
S L L Z asx $
sa�s�w snoloaxa ' xx I3M3r
OZ T 9C
asxa
0
S 08
osx
S8� 6
T azxZ
T S
MaWd n63 3DI33O
£ T £ £T asx'I aLx $
5xO3HD ' xoN3�xnD
0 0 S
0 0 S
Tasx
0 0
l�
£ a,LIKI VT asx ��S /�-: alzuannr
£ asxz :aTTuannr
�I
AlUSdOUd a3233nODSH
—asxz uayx ��—/� pa4eaoZ suosJad buissT14
�T`-ay1Ca—£—aJ,]t ---D--4TnpH :paubzsSV .sasgO suos.zad buTT
ssw
(' a, SNOO) SHIJ IAIIDV SNO IUd 9NISSIw/3`IIN3nnr
r_
JULY 1984 DETECTIVE DENNIS ALLEN
IN CUSTODY INVESTIGATIONS:
84-2436 ANTHONY EUGENE CONKLIN was arrested by patrol officers for residential
burglary. One felony count burglary filed against Conklin.
84-2473 BRODERICK PAUL PINKNEY was arrested by patrol officers for indecent exposure
(314.1 PC). One misdemeanor count filed.
84-2475 LAMAR MARSOL WHITE and JOHN D JORDAN were arrested by patrol officers for
two counts commercial burglary. Two felony counts of burglary were filed
against each subject. At the preliminary hearing White was held to answer
to both counts. Jordan failed to appear thus an arrest warrant was issued.
Jordan has since been arrested on the warrant and is awaiting his
preliminary hearing.
84-2643/84-2648 STEVE HOWARD SHELTON was arrested by patrol officers for vehicle
burglary when a personal computer was found next to him. Investigation
revealed that the computer was taken from a commercial building and not
the vehicle which initially was believed. The case was rejected by the
District Attorney's Office due to insufficient evidence to connect the
suspect to the box.
CASE UPDATES:
83-3314 WALTER MOORE GIRTON (charged with five felony counts -four counts residential
burglary, one count robbery) pled guilty to the four counts residential
burglary. The robbery count was dismissed. Girton was sentenced to
nine years State Prison.
83-1785 JESSE MICHAEL KING (charged with one felony count residential burglary)
was held to answer at his preliminary hearing.
84-0780 MIKE ALLEN HILL (charged with one felony count residential burglary). Hill
pled guilty to first degree burglary. Probation and sentencing set for 8-23-84.
84-1251 MICHAEL BARTOZE (charged with one felony count residential burglary).
Bartoze pled guilty to first degree burglary and was sentenced to two years
State Prison.
84-1788 CHRISTOPHER STEVEN MEAD (charged with eight felony counts of commercial
burglary). Mead pled guilty to all eight counts and was sentenced to
five years State Prison.
84-2299 GEORGE ALBERT GARBER (charged with five felony counts of commercial burglary).
Garber was held to answer on two counts at his preliminary hearing, the
remaining three counts were dismissed due to insufficient to connect the
suspect to the crime scenes.
DETECTIVE ARRESTS:
84-2274 COLLIN JAMES WILSON was arrested by me for residential burglary and felony
malicious mischief after executing a search warrant at his residence and
recovering the stolen property.
84-2261 DAVID MICHAEL LEBUS was arrested by me for grand theft during the investigation
of a residential burglary. Some of the property was recovered.
MONTHY STATISTICS REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING 073184
FROM: DET TOM THOMPSON
The month of July showed a marked increase in all cases. I was assigned
the following cases by crimes:
1- Pipe bomb explsion investigation -070484 84-2433
5- misdemeanor assault investigations
20- Auto theft investigations _
4- Annoying/Threatening phone call investigations
2- Felony Assault investigations
5- Robbery Investigations
1- Kidnapping Investigation
I was called out on 073084 at 0200 hours regarding an Officer Involved Shooting
incident involving one of the robbery cases(84-2817). Felony charges of robbery,
grand theft auto, assualt with a deadly weapon and assault with a deadly weapon on
a police officer were filed againts the driver of the vehicle Kennard E. Beard
of Redondo Beach. The suspect who was shot by a Hermosa Officer recovered and
has been discharged from the hospital. The District Attorneys office rejected
the case against him. The juvenile in the car was released to his parents and no
charges were filed against him due to insufficient evidence.
I investigated a pipe bomb explosion at 8th and Monterey which damaged 5 vehicles
and three builsings. The sewer also had to be repaired by our city yard.
We received information through a law enforcement officer regarding possible
suspect information. A picture was obtained of the named suspect and a photo
line-up was shown to the witness_ The witness was unable to pick out the
possible suspect. The witness saw possible suspects leaving the area in a
small red compact vehicle possibly a Plymouth.Horizon or a Chevy Chevette. He
also heard one suspect say that it was not funny anymore and then the 2 males
and 1 female left the area. The witness saw the suspects from the side and
it was dark. The witness told me he would have trouble identifying a suspect,
but would cooperate anyway he could. No current suspects are being investigated.
Det Tom Thompson 077
DET C.V. GRIFFITTS #094, July 1984 Statistics
CURRENT CASES:
DR# 84-2832 I am currently investigating a suspected child sexual
abuse that has apparently occurred over the last few
months in the City of Hermosa Beach. The victim, a.5
year old girl states that the boyfriend of her mother
molested her while under the influence of narcotics.
NOTE: Reported cases of child abuse appears to be lower this month.
UPDATE ON CASES:
DR# 84-2310 The in home day care suspected child molest investiga-
tion is continuing. The child has completed a physical
exam with no signs of misuse, however his statements are
consistent with a sexually abused child. A therapist
has been contacted and the parents are deciding wether
to proceed with the case.
DR# 84-2341 A case of a physical abuse of a 13 year old girl by the
father reported last month. The girl was taken into
protective custody where she remained until the morning
of the court hearing when she ran away. Unable to locate
at this time.
DR# 84-1759 The investigation into a child molest case involving a
brother and sister being molested by thier step -father
continued this month. The mother and kids have dis-
appeared and our investigation has been solely to locate
them. The district attorney. office did not file the case
against the step -father due to'the fact the -witness and
victims were unavailable. A stake out of the suspect
following his court appearance in an effort to locate the
mother and kids proved negative following a 6 hour effort.
The district attorney office intends on filing a case
against the mother and issuing a warrant for her arrest.
DR# 84-1724 An investigation of a suspected sexual abuse of a 4 1/2
year old female is continuing. A therapist has been rconductins
extensive interviews with the child. The latest indication
is that the molestaticns occurred in San Pedro.
OTHER CASES OF INTEREST:
DR# 84-2628 A forgery case was investigated;. --leading to the arrest
of the susect in L.A.P.D Wilshire Area while he was in
a reported stolen vehicle. The suspect stole checks
from a van in Hermosa Beach, forged and cashed them in
Los Angeles. The investigation lead the to address of
a possible suspect. A stake out of his residence lead
to his arrest when he drove from the area in a reported
stolen vehicle. Case presented to the District Attorneys
office who refered the case to our city prosecutor to be
handled as a misdemeanor.
FORGERY: An investigation into the forgery of checks at local bars
resulted in the identification of a suspect and the issu-
ance of warrants charging two counts of forgery. Manhattan
Beach Police Department also holds a warrant for the suspects
arrest for similiar charges. We have been unable to locate
the suspect thus far.
JUVENILES: There has been a great increase in juvenile detentions.
There were twenty juveniles detained at the station for
a variety of reasons ranging from curfew violations to
drinking in public, marijuana, intoxication all the way
to having sex in a public restroom and trespassing.
DET. C.V.GRIFFITTS
INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT