HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/11/84M
"IF WE CAN EVER MAKE RED TAPE NUTRITIONAL, WE CAN FEED THE WORLD."
- Robert M. Schaeberle
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 11, 1984 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Closed Session - 6:30 p.m.
Regular Session - 7:30 p.m.
All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
It is requested that anyone who wishes to speak on any matter, please
give their name and address for the record.
Any complaints against the City Council, City Management, or depart-
mental operations will be submitted in writing to the City Manager
for evaluation by the appropriate department head prior to submission
to the City Council.
Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the
Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk.
------------7--------------------------------------------------------
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
PRESENTATION: To Mayor Gary L. Brutsch from Association for
Retarded Citizens - Southwest
PROCLAMATIONS: Cystic Fibrosis Week, September 16 22, 1984
Constitution Week, September 17 - 23, 1984
Disabled Artists Week, October 7 - 13, 1984
1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted
upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the
City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these
items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll
call vote. (Items removed will be considered after Municipal
Matters.)
(a) Approval of Minutes: Regular meeting of the Hermosa Beach City
Council held on August 28, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve minutes.
(b) Approval of Minutes: Special meeting of the Hermosa Beach City
Council held on September 4, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve minutes.
(c� Demands and Warrants: September 11, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve Demands and Warrants Nos.
through inclusive.
City Council Agenda - September 11, 1984
(d) Cancellation of Warrants. Memorandum from City Treasurer Norma
Goldbach dated August 31, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve cancellation of warrants.
(e) Award of Bid: Strand Improvements, 8th Street to 15th Street.
Memorandum from Act , ing Public Works Director William Grove dated
September 6, 1984.
Recommended Action: To award bid per staff recommendation.
Recommendation to authorize the City Manager to sign a supplemental
Memorandum of Understanding with the Middle Management Bargaining
Unit to provide special duty pay for the Police Department Com-
puter Coordinator. Memorandum from Police Chief Frank Beeson
dated September 6, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve staff recommendation.
(g) Recommendation to approve the Police Department Reserve Officer
By -Laws. Memorandum from Police Chief Frank Beeson dated Sept-
ember 6, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve staff recommendation.
(h) Detective Bureau Monthly Report: August 1984.
Recommended Action: To receive and file.
(i City Manager Activity Report. Memorandum from City Manager Gregory
T. Meyer dated September 6, 1984.
Recommended Action: To receive and file.
(j) Tentative Future Agenda Items.
Recommended Action: To receive and file.
Approval in Concept to pursue tax exempt financing for public
parking at Alpha Beta Shopping Center. Memorandum from City Manager
Gregory T. Meyer dated September 7, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve in concept.
(1) A resolution of intent to direct the Planning Commission to examine
Sections 404, 505, 555, 606, and 706 of the Zoning Code as they
pertain to lot coverage to determine whether or not square footage
of second story balconies is included in calculations of lot coverage.
Memorandum from Planning Director Pamela Sapetto dated September 6,
1984.
Recommended Action: To adopt resolution.
(m) A resolution of intent to direct the Planning Commission to consider
amending Sections 401 and 501 of the Zoning Code as it pertains to
sideyard setbacks to delineate a maximum required sideyard setback
of 5' for R-1 and R-2 developments.
Recommended Action: To adopt resolution.
(n) A resolution of intent to direct the Planning Commission to consider
amending the Zoning Code, Section 1162, Off -Street Parking, Require-
ments for new and existi::g construction, to allow additions of 100
square feet, or less, without a variance.
Recommended Action: To adopt resolution.
- 2 -
City Council Agenda - September 11, 1984
(o) ORDINANCE NO. 84-775 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH SETTING THE PARKING METER RATES THROUGHOUT
THE CITY TO TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250) PER HALF HOUR. For waiver
of further reading and adoption.
(p) ORDINANCE NO. 84-776 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N.S. 154, SECTIONS
1301, 1302, 1304 AND 1309 AS THEY RELATE TO ADDITIONS TO, AND
REHABILITATION OF, NONCONFORMING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. For
waiver of further reading and adoption.
(q) Approval of ,job description for Community Resources Recreation
Specialist. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana
Mastrian dated September 5, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve job description.
(r) Approval of job description for Community Resources Coordinator.
Recommended Action: To approve job description.
2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC.
a. Letter from Roger Creighton, 1101 - 2nd St., dated
August 28, 1984.
HEARINGS
3. AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR BUILDING, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING
AND MECHANICAL PERMITS. Memorandum from Building and Safety
Director William Grove dated September 5, 1984.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. PROPOSED PROSPECT HEIGHTS REZONING - RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE
PUBLIC HEARING. Memorandum from Planning Director Pamela Sapetto
dated September 6, 1984.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
5. REPORT RE. POSSIBLE SOUTH SCHOOL REZONING. Memorandum from Planning
Director Pamela Sapetto dated September 6, 1984.
6. STATUS REPORT.RE. REFERENDUM PETI-TI-ON RE, REPEALING HOTEL SPECIFIC
PLAN.
7. REFERENDUM PETITION/SPECIAL ELECTION - HOTEL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
a. REFERENDUM PETITION SUFFICIENCY
b. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CALLING AND GIVING
NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, , 1984
FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF
THE CITY AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO APPROVING A DEV-
ELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH AND GREENWOOD AND LANGLOIS, A CALIFORNIA
GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HOTEL
AND CONFERENCE FACILITIES IN THE CITY.
-3-
City Council Agenda - September 11, 1984
C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL REQUESTING THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO RENDER
SPECIFIED SERVICES TO SAID CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT
OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY
ON TUESDAY,
d. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF
ITS MEMBER& TO FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY
MEASURE (AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS).
e. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL PROVIDING FOR THE FILING
OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES SUBMITTED AT
THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF
8. REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION AND DIRECTION FOR REVIEW OF SIGN
ORDINANCE. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William
Grove dated September 5, 1984.
9. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION.
10. MEETING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT COMMISSION.
a. Approval of minutes of 8/28 meeting.
b. 1984-85 Vehicle Parking District Budget.
C. Status report re. job descriptions for
VPD personnel.
d. Status report on inactive public deposits
for VPD.
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
a. Report on Laurel, Maryland's request to
become Sister City.
b. Request for Closed Session.
12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
a. Letter of Resignation from City Attorney Charles J. Post
b. Railroad Right -of -Way Subcommittee report
C. Child Abuse Subcommittee report
d. Report from Councilman Barks re.
U.S./Mex"ico Internationa3 Sister City Convention
13. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC - MATTERS OF AN URGENCY NATURE.
14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL.
ADJOURNMENT
c—
✓ PPS
-4-
"IF WE CAN EVER MAKE RFD TAPE NUTRITIONAL, WE CAN FEED THE WORLD."
- Robert M. Schaeberle
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 11, 1984 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Closed Session - 6:30 p.m.
Regular Session - 7:30 p.m.
All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
It is requested that anyone who wishes to speak on any matter, please
give their name and address for the record. ,
Any complaints against the City Council, City Management, or depart-
mental operations will be submitted in writing to the City Manager
for evaluation by the appropriate department head prior to submission
to the City Council.
Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the
Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk.
------------7--------------------------------------------------------
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
PRESENTATION: To Mayor Gary L. Brutsch from Association for
Retarded Citizens - Southwest
PROCLAMATIONS: Cystic Fibrosis Week, September 16 22, 1984
Constitution Week, September 17 - 23, 1984
Disabled Artists Week, October 7 - 13, 1984
1.
CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted
upon by one
vote to approve with the majority consent of the
City Council.
There will be no separate discussion of these
items unless
good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll
call vote.
(Items removed will be considered after Municipal
Matters.)
(a)
Approval of
Minutes: Regular meeting of the Hermosa Beach City
Council held
on August 28, 1984.
Recommended
Action: To approve minutes.
(b)
Approval of
Minutes: Special meeting of the Hermosa Beach City
Council held
on September 4, 1984.
Recommended
Action: To approve minutes.
(c)
Demands and
Warrants: September 11, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve Demands and Warrants Nos.
through inclusive.
City Council Agenda - September 11, 1984
(d) Cancellation of Warrants. Memorandum from City Treasurer Norma
Goldbach dated August 31, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve cancellation of warrants.
(e) Award of Bid: Strand Improvements, 8th Street to 15th Street.
Memorandum from Acting Public Works Director William Grove dated
September 6, 1984
Recommended Action: To award.>bid per staff recommendation.
(f) Recommendation to authorize the City Manager to sign a supplemental
Memorandum of Understanding with the Middle Management Bargaining
Unit to provide special duty pay for the Police Department Com-
puter Coordinator. Memorandum from Police Chief Frank Beeson
dated September 6, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve staff recommendation.
(g) Recommendation to approve the Police Department Reserve Officer
By -Laws. Memorandum from Police Chief Frank Beeson dated Sept-
ember 6, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve staff recommendation.
(h) Detective Bureau Monthly Report: August 1984.
Recommended Action: To receive and file.
(i) City Manager Activity Report. Memorandum from City Manager Gregory
T. Meyer dated September 6, 1984.
Recommended Action: To receive and file.
(j) Tentative Future Agenda Items.
Recommended Action: To receive and file.
(k) Approval in Concept to pursue tax exempt financing for public
parking at Alpha Beta Shopping Center. Memorandum from City Manager
Gregory T. Meyer dated September 7, 1984. OK 3-2 (NEED THE WRITTEN
REQUEST FROM BACON).
Recommended Action: To approve in concept.
(1) A resolution of intent to direct the Planning Commission to examine_
Sections 404, 505, 555, 606, and 706 of the Zoning Code as they
pertain to lot coverage to determine whether or not square footage
of second story balconies is included in calculations of lot coverage.
Memorandum from Planning Director Pamela Sapetto dated September 6,
1984.
Recommended Action: To adopt resolution.
(m) A resolution of intent to direct the Planning Commission to consider
amending Sections 401 and 501 of the Zoning Code as it pertains to
sideyard setbacks to delineate a, maximum required sideyard setback
of 5' for R-1 and R-2 developments.
Recommended Action: To adopt resolution.
(n) A resolution of ihteiit to direct the Planning Commission to consider
amending the Zoning Code, Section 1162, Off -Street Parking, Require-
ments for new and existing construction, to allow additions of 100
square feet, or less, without a variance.
Recommended Action: To adopt resolution.
- 2 -
City Council Agenda - September 11, 1984
(o) ORDINANCE NO. 84-775 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH SETTING THE PARKING METER RATES THROUGHOUT
THE CITY TO TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250) PER HALF HOUR. For waiver
of further reading and adoption.
(p) ORDINANCE NO. 84-776 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N.S. 154, SECTIONS
1301, 1302, 1304 AND 1309 AS THEY RELATE TO ADDITIONS TO, AND
REHABILITATION OF, NONCONFORMING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. For
waiver of further reading and adoption.
(q) Approval of job description for Community Resources Recreation
Specialist. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana
Mastrian dated September 5, 1984.
Recommended Action: To approve job description.
(r) Approval of job description for Community Resources Coordinator.
Recommended Action: To approve job description.
2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC.
a. Letter from Roger Creighton, 1101 - 2nd St., dated
August 28, 1984. (b) P.A. Bratti ltr. 348 Hollowell
(c) M/M Walter J. Taylor, 454 Hollowell. R & F
3. AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR BUILDING, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING
AND MECHANICAL PERMITS. Memorandum from Building and Safety
Director William Grove dated September 5, 1984. OK 4-1 Wood Abstain
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. PROPOSED PROSPECT HEIGHTS REZONING - RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE
PUBLIC HEARING. Memorandum from Planning Director Pamela Sapetto
dated September 6, 1984. CONTD. TO 10/9
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
5. REPORT RE. POSSIBLE SOUTH SCHOOL REZONING. Memorandum from Planning
Director Pamela Sapetto dated September 6, 1984. CONT. TO 10/9
6. STATUS_ REP.ORT.RE..-REFERENDUM PETI_TI-ON RE. REPEALING._HOTEL SPECIFIC
PLAN. REPORT ON COURT ACTION BY CHIP POST
7. REFERENDUM PETITION/SPECIAL ELECTION - HOTEL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
a. REFERENDUM PETITION SUFFICIENCY R & F 5-0
b. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CALLING A-iTD GIVING
NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, 12/11 , 1984
FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF
THE CITY AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO APPROVING A DEV-
ELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH AND GREENWOOD AND LANGLOIS, A CALIFORNIA
GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HOTEL
AND CONFERENCE FACILITIES IN THE CITY. OK 5-0
-3-
ARGUMENTS & IMPARTIAL DUE 9/25
REBUTTALS DUE 10/5
City Council Agenda - September 11, 1984
C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL REQUESTING THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO RENDER
SPECIFIED SERVICES TO SAID CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT
OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY
ON TUESDAY, 12/11 OK 5-0
d. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF
ITS MEMBERS`*TO FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY
MEASURE (AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS). *OR FRIENDS OF HOTEL OK 5-0
e. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL PROVIDING FOR THE FILING
OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES SUBMITTED AT
THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF 12/11
OK TO ACCEPT REBUTTALS - 5-0
8. REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION AND DIRECTION FOR REVIEW OF SIGN
ORDINANCE. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William
Grove dated September 5, 1984. WOOD TO PREPARE RES. OF INTENT W/ADD'L.
AREAS OF SIGN CODE TO BE STUDIED.
9. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION.
10.
MEETING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT COMMISSION.
Wroval of minutes of 8/28 meeting OK 5-0
CM ARRAME CITY STAFF MEMBER TO TAKE MINUTES—W=A COMPENSATION.
b. 1984-85 Vehicle Parking District Budget.
CONT. T 10/9
C. Status report re. job descriptions for
VPD personnel. R & F
d. Status report on inactive public.deposits
for VPD. R & F
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
a.
Report on Laurel, Maryland's request to
become Sister City. "FRIENDSHIP CITY" OK 4-1 Br
b. Request for Closed Session. 10/9 AT 6:00 p.m.
12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
13.
14.
aACCEtESfPO1tGIIes J. Post
�%RE - PREPAREAPRPRATERECONTON
b. Railroad Right -of -Way Subcommittee report
C. Child Abuse Subcommittee report
CIOFFI PLANS.MTG. 1ST WEEK OCTOBER, REPORT BACK 2ND MTG. OF OCTOBER
d. Report from Councilman Barks re.
U.S./Mex"ico International Sister City Convention
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC - MATTERS OF AN URGENCY NATURE.
OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL.
SEE ATTACHED PAGE
ADJOURNMENT
ACTION'ON 12a• TO HIRE MR. MURRAY KANE OF WEISER, KANE, BELLMER AND
BERKMAN AS INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY W/7 DAY CANCELLATION CLAUSE WHILE
PERMANENT C.A. BEING CHOSEN.
ZT 01 8
HHSWHAON O,LHHOrI 01 ,L I S I A A,LI J HH,LS I S Hod HHVdHHd rIrII M : SxHvg
* DNI,LHHW 6/01 AS
HAVH `I'IIM SAGS 'W'J '`IOOHJS HIGOS IV 100 JNIXHVd d0
NOTIMH,LSNOJ ' HH HH,L,LHrI 01 HSNOdSHH NI HH,L,LH I d0 SfI,LV,LS
'aNVH,LS NO JNIdIH,LS
d0 NOI,LSROOM Hod SHgVH NHOP 01 aOA xNVIU aH.LSHflbHH
'ONIrIr vlsNI
HOd SMHHJ All J O,.L SxNVH,L OSrlV ' aHV09HHOJS 000'2$
JNTAag Hod HflDVarI HrI,L,LIrI 01 SxNIIH,L d0 HH,IIHrI allISHROHH
'H,LNOW d0 aNH AS WHOJ aI`IOS NI NOIIDV HAHH rIrIIM aHIVOIaNI
,LSOd dIHJ ' HaNHAV VSOWHHH 09 JO Sa,LV,LS 01 Sal aHHIf1bNI : SIgUH9RG
JNI,LHHW 6 'IJO IV HAVH rIrIIM aIVS
' W' J 'da MOHS ION aIa ,LHOdHH HHHfISITHH,L A,LIJ ,LSI aHNIVrldWOJ
' NHWQH IHd ,LO , 3VINOJ gVgHHA ' ONI,LHHW 6 HHSO,LJO AS
SNOI,La`IOS HOd 'W'D 01 HJJUH 'H,LrI NHIrI MUMHaIS NVWQHIHd
'OWHW NH,L,LIHM V JNIHVdHHd SI
HH aHIVOI GNI 'HOW A,L I J ' ,LNVHHIIM I SW ' HH SNOI,LSHab SVH
'ONI,LHHW 'IIJNfIOJ ,LSVrI ,LFI
GaIHOdHH DH'I,LOO9 NO da MOagOd NO NOS,LVW xHdW ,LNHWIrldWOJ : a00M
NOOS ,LHHW GgDOHS HH,L,L I WWOJSfIS HH I d -HJ I qOd / rI I JNaOJ A,L I J
',LJHdSOHd HA09V SXNaxS H,LIM WHrIgOHd
OM T -t x0 ' (aNHIJ,V a'IaOHS HNOHWOS
`SONI,LHHW HHH,LO Sar10H HHS dI) SHa,LdOJI'IHH NO aNVIS HHH
ONI,LHOddaS ggaSSaH NVWOM'II JNaOJ 01 HH,L,LHrI aNHS 01 NOI,LOW
(HH,L,LHrI Him)
H,LIS HHOWIgIH aNaOHV HH,L,LIrI 'HH HH,L,LHr1 Hod ,LSHMU :HJS,LaHg
SHHIIVW HHH10
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the
CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH
September 7, 1984
REGULAR MEETING of
September 11, 1984
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO EXAMINE SECTIONS 405, 5051 5551 606, AND 706 OF
THE ZONING CODE AS THEY PERTAIN TO LOT COVERAGE TO DETERMINE
WHETHER OR NOT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SECOND STORY BALCONIES IS
INCLUDED IN CALCULATIONS OF LOT COVERAGE.
Recommendation
To adopt the attached Resolution of Intention.
Background
At the regular meeting of August 14, 1984, the City Council expressed its desire to
have the Planning Commission examine this issue. The impetus for this direction is the
idea that a development that is already covering the maximum percentage allowable on
a lot would not be able to add on a second story balcony. The Council is directing the
Planning Comission to review lot coverage and return with a recommendation.
NOTED:
Bill Grove
Building Director
CONCUR:
Gregory T. Meyer
City Manager
Yw, I ./
Kim Reardon -Crites
Planning Assistant
Pamela Sapetto
Planning Director
t , r.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 84-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE
.ANNING COMMISSION TO EXAMINE SECTIONS 404, 505, 555, 6061 AND 706 OF
lE ZONING CODE AS THEY PERTAIN TO LOT COVERAGE TO DETERMINE
TETHER OR NOT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SECOND STORY BALCONIES IS
CLUDED IN CALCULATIONS OF LOT COVERAGE.
WHEREAS, clarification of whether or not the square footage of a second story
lcony is included in the calculation of lot coverage is needed; and
WHEREAS, Sections 404, 505, 555, 606, and 706 of the Zoning Code do not
ecify the factors used in calculating residential lot coverage;
:)W, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
!reby resolve as follows:
ion 1. That the Planning Commission be directed to research and assess Sections
404, 505, 555, 606, and 706 of the Zoning Code to determine whether or
not it was the intent to include square footage of second story balconies
in calculations of lot coverage.
ction 2. That the Planning Commission shall return their recommendation with
appropriate Zoning Code amendments (if applicable) within forty (40) days
to the City Council
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of September, 1984.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California.
/kTTEST: CITY CLERK
gPPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY
i
,bw
September 7, 1984
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the REGULAR MEETING of
CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH September 11, 1984
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE ZONING CODE, SECTION
11621 OFF STREET PARKING, REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW & EXISTING
CONSTRUCTION,TO ALLOW ADDITIONS OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR LESS, WITHOUT
A VARIANCE.
Recommendation
To adopt the attached Resolution of Intention.
Background
At the regular meeting of August 28, 1984, the City Council expressed its desire to
have the Planning Commission examine the zoning code as it pertains to
non -conforming structures. It was recommended that the Commission consider
amending the zoning code so .that it would allow additions of 100 sq. ft. or less to
non -conforming structures without the necessity of applying for a variance. The
attached Resolution of Intention gives the Planning Commission such a directive.
mm=idw
Kim Reardon -Crites
Planning Assistant
Pamela Sapetto
Planning Director
NOTED:
Bill Grove
Building Director
CONCUR:
Gregory T. Meyer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18I
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 84-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
AMENDING THE ZONING CODE, SECTION 1162, OFF-STREET PARKING
REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO ALLOW ADDITIONS
OF 100 SQUARE FEET9 OR LESS, WITHOUT A VARIANCE.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it desirable to maintain and improve the
existing housing stock; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the provisions of the zoning
ordinance regulating additions to non -conforming structures are restrictive and
discourage remodeling and rehabilitation of those structures.
NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the Planning Commission be directed to hold a public hearing and
research and assess amending Section 1162 of the Zoning Code to allow
additions of one hundred (100) square feet, or less, without a variance.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of September, 1984.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
,b.
HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1984
THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH
REGULAR MEETING OF
SEPTEMBER 11, 1984
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE PLANNING CO3ZAISSION
TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTIONS 401 AND 501 OF THE ZONING CODE AS
IT PERTAINS TO SIDEYARD SETBACKS TO DESIGNATE A MAXIMt7M REQUIRED
SIDEYARD SETBACK OF 5 FOR R-1 AND R-2 DEVELOPMENTS.
Recommendation
To adopt the attached Resolution of Intention.
Background
At its regularly scheduled meeting of August 28, 1984, the City
Council requested that a Resolution of Intention be created to
address the issue of maximum sideyard setbacks for R-1 and R-2
developments. Staff is returning with the Resolution for Council
adoption.
NOTED:
— E'-4 C"_'�'44
Bill Grove
Building Director
CONCUR
Grego y T. Meyer
City pager
Kim Reardon -Crites
Planning Assistant
PaAela Sapetto
Planning Director
HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1954
THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH
REGULAR MEETING OF
SEPTEMBER 11, 1954
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTIONS 401 AND 501 OF THE ZONING CODE AS
IT PERTAINS TO SIDEYARD SETBACKS TO DESIGNATE A MAX13AUM REQUIRED
SIDEYARD SETBACK OF 5 FOR R-1 AND R-2 DEVELOPMENTS.
Recommendation
To adopt the attached Resolution of Intention.
Background
At its regularly scheduled meeting of August 25, 1954, the City
Council requested that a Resolution of Intention be created to -.
address the issue of maximum sideyard setbacks for R-1 and R-2
developments. Staff is returning with the Resolution for Council
adoption.
NOTED: EA�
L,-,-
Bill Grove
Building Director
CONCUR•
Gregoy T. Meyer-
City
eyer
City pager
Kim Reardon -Crites
Planning Assistant
-' . 'ki) rt(—)
Palela Sapetto
Planning.Director
September 5, 1984
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the REGULAR MEETING of
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL September 11, 1984
REZONING OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS
Recommendation
To review the Planning Commission's recommendation for the rezoning of the Prospect
Heights property.
Background
The City negotiated with the School District for the purchase of a portion of Prospect
Heights School (see attached map) to be maintained as permanent Open Space. The
School District was then going to sell the remainng 17 lots with the assumption that,
as unzoned properties, each lot could be developed to R-1 standards. It was then
brought to light that five (5) of these lots were zoned open space rather than unzoned
and thus could not be developed at all. The School Board petitioned to have the
zoning for these five lots changed from open space to unzoned and the Planning
Commission considered this item at their regularly scheduled meeting of September 4,
1984.
Analysis
The Planning Commission's primary concern in the rezoning of Prospect Heights is that
they wish to avoid the development of a row of 19' wide houses on 25' wide lots. This
type of "shoe box" development creates parking problems as each separate lot must
make a curb cut (in order to gain access to a garage) thereby reducing the number of
on -street parking spaces. The Commission feels that seventeen (17) separate R-1
developments would not provide an aesthetically pleasing use of the space available.
The Commission has recommended rezoning the site (with the exception of the
property the City has recently purchased) to R-2 Planned Development with a
7-7
A '
I
H t
maximum of fifteen (15) units for the entire site. The General Plan Designation would
be medium density which corresponds to the R-2 zoning. As such, the Planning
Commission will be able to review the plans of the developer and have input as to the
form and design of the project.
The developer will be able to utilize a more creative approach in utilizing the space.
The School District had requested that the City change the zoning for the five lots in
question from open space to unzoned so that the full 17 units may be separately
developed. The Commission would like to maintain a measure of control in terms of
design criteria and hence has indicated its desire to see a planned development on this
property. The Commission is returning with its recommendation to the City Council.
Kim Reardon -Crites
Planning Assistant
Pamela Sapetto
Planning Director
CONCUR:
Gregory T. Meyer
City Manager
/ I I
September 7, 1984
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the REGULAR MEETING of
CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH September 11, 1984
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE ZONING CODE, SECTION
11629 OFF STREET PARKING2 REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW & EXISTING
CONSTRUCTION, TO ALLOW ADDITIONS OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR LESS, WITHOUT
A VARIANCE.
Recommendation
To adopt the attached Resolution of Intention.
Background
At the regular meeting of August 28, 1984, the City Council expressed its desire to
have the Planning Commission examine the zoning code as it pertains to
non -conforming structures. It was recommended that the Commission consider
amending the zoning code so that it would allow additions of 100 sq. ft. or less to
non -conforming structures without the necessity of applying for a variance. The
attached Resolution of Intention gives the Planning Commission such a directive.
fit,►' t dw S
Kim Reardon -Crites
Planning Assistant
Pamela Sapetto
Planning Director
NOTED:
'g4' L::�:'
Bill Grove
Building Director
CO UR:
Gre ory . M er
City Manager
Ov
ti
r4
.
t. r.
10
F I *+a y y"I+gr`
+ - t tri�••; - } 1s f n - i f rt
- ✓y,�g2.4j� #� �9.?.j_i�Y 1� ...t �iySC7� _.��G ����.�{ /Ni �
r' r i f'Y [ '�/� �q�. -0 �c^
�V�iwe ,:�-T��-.'Sw�.s.. aT����`--- ��w'
.. .
i,•fY; 4�.iv+y�'t�bl Yi/4� _ Cs' 4, :�Y-�1'�. �.�- �F Ci j�F'�'�f-.'Sr'_'S_S1. '�� � J��i.� .C. --�, ."!.yP M,*;5S.
�_ l
_
•iU•
- ►�' ;i3CE :�iiu '`�+`. +.. - .Y',`ti .'F':.i -Y. .}a�t�srS� +.�_� �r
-IT f�. ,t�•Sr-M:pZ iii_Sl�h..7 " F'i. ;r?dC 2;r
- --
. - .q�1��•���i'�i ��?�Y +�ad-N'`�.-r�i?� y'ir-r_ r •:r r i ��-��+�%f�i �i�.�.� -_ . ntiC�'.'�' 3r1.� _L �'` �����r��is',� ' ���'�,.�j��.
_
_
`
I�a+4P�;j.•:.'rG
�np�r:�. �f• ��1t1`7Y, :•}.'-� i.�i - QGe 3: f'
rr-1 fi(�� `s".4i;,`Y.t•+fr ^.] zt'+
` _
q I!"2 _ •�t✓'F..±C1i ; �yi t!}-,F(?,:�. -
- _
.-
.. . �r+•� r., - .w 7777
Afi.LF .. 1.�
_x
i ! Y :: y tf. T •` +
�
at
jAi If."M goo
=L:.°s.:.i1�..st�r.�.r.} fJY:. .i�.'it�$r.�' �'3•'�i�f::i-
-
Iry
-_��Y.t7�,.;�,.3S�iS►'.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 84-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
AMENDING THE ZONING CODE, SECTION 1162, OFF-STREET PARKING
REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION -TO -?FL -L --GW ADDITIONS
Or 100 SQUARE FEET9 OR LESS, WITHOUT A VARIANCE.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it desirable to maintain and improve the
existing housing stock; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the provisions of the zoning
ordinance regulating additions to non -conforming structures are restrictive and
discourage remodeling and rehabilitation of those structures.
NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the Planning Commission be directed to hold a public hearing and
research and assess amending Section 1162 of the Zoning Code to allow
additions of one hundred (100) square feet, or less, without a variance.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of September, 1984.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
� b.
k -
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the
CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH
September 7, 1984
REGULAR MEETING of
September 11, 1984
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO EXAMINE SECTIONS 405, 5051 555, 6069 AND 706 OF
THE ZONING CODE AS THEY PERTAIN TO LOT COVERAGE TO DETERMINE
WHETHER OR NOT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SECOND STORY BALCONIES IS
INCLUDED IN CALCULATIONS OF LOT COVERAGE.
Recommendation
To adopt the attached Resolution of Intention.
Background
At the regular meeting of August 14, 1984, the City Council expressed its desire to
have the Planning Commission examine this issue. The impetus for this direction is the
idea that a development that is already covering the maximum percentage allowable on
a lot would not be able to add on a second story balcony. The Council is directing the
Planning Comission to review lot coverage and return with a recommendation.
NOTED:
,SD
Bill Grove
Building Director
CT, CUR
Greory . M yer
Cit Manager
Kim Reardon -Crites
Planning Assistant
b
Pamela Sapetto
Planning Director
• � r� - sly } ' �= Y
_•� .. _ - .'fir � - �`•�.•' -
--�'-
__
_ �- t� l—f" - - F' - ` ,fir= �€�•r=• c �'r'"--�5: _ - � _ _ _ - - _�'' � .
Jw
r�.
_ _ ,.�1 ti; -_ r ''I,� �� •ice - ' - � c� - t
-��11 � Y � � .Z �'''� _ , - � • 5 ,max •_ '' s,.4. - - - . rj a _ � , - _ _
-fir-,Ire
__ �.' •_ ..-rte' - , - - - � _ ', � _ _ � -'�-_ - - - _ -rr `_ __ - _ ���' ti- - _..r , �',.J
16 1
5 • � tit - _ _ - . - � }° ` -- - r }_� ` -• I I ��_� _�
-
_�'=_
TL4' al
mow
�•' -�
r _ - _ tw - • 1. r J " r - r��-• z. , -ji-•'��
-36
7-71
H i� • _ - _ -' x.51 er - _ _ _ice __ �r�f ` �+ 'L- - - _ - �" �r - - _ �� - q - -
. ��?zi.��:��•'r� .Se 1�1 �J -—,'Ahl7 , - _..� .��•_� � 1, ..� - � �_ - - - � _ �� S- .'� , �•'�r" r_�
- , _.. - - ham- •rw
�'�.���,: •' �� - - ___ -- - _ - �- _ _ .__ 4 ,� Fir}-'rz �_-4� - _ _ :_ � a ��=��}'��_�
. jIc
r: -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
P -a
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 84-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE
.ANNING COMMISSION TO EXAMINE SECTIONS 404, 505, 555, 6061 AND 706 OF
iE ZONING CODE AS THEY PERTAIN TO LOT COVERAGE TO DETERMINE
TETHER OR NOT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SECOND STORY BALCONIES IS
CLUDED IN CALCULATIONS OF LOT COVERAGE.
WHEREAS, clarification of whether or not the square footage of a second story
.lcony is included in the calculation of lot coverage is needed; and
WHEREAS, Sections 404, 505, 555, 606, and 706 of the Zoning Code do not
ecify the factors used in calculating residential lot coverage;
DW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
�reby resolve as follows:
ion 1. That the Planning Commission be directed to research and assess Sections
404, 505, 555, 606, and 706 of the Zoning Code to determine whether or
not it was the intent to include square footage of second story balconies
in calculations of lot coverage.
ion 2. That the Planning Commission shall return their recommendation with
appropriate Zoning Code amendments (if applicable) within forty (40) days
to the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of September, 1984.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California.
ATTEST: CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY
September 7, 1984
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the REGULAR MEETING of
CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH September 11, 1984
SOUTH SCHOOL SITE REZONING
Recommendation
To review the Planning Commission recommendation for the rezoning of South School
property on 9-27-84.
Background
This item is scheduled for the next regular meeting of the City Council. However,
because of possible length of this item, the Council may wish to consider this at a
special meeting. If the Council sets a special meeting on 9-27-84 for Prospect
Heights, you may wish to consider the South School rezoning issue at the same time.
Otherwise, the South School rezoning recommendation will be scheduled for the
10-9-84 meeting.
Pamela Sapetto
Planning Director
CO CUR:
dau 0A
Grery f. M er
Cit Manager
c
t
September 7, 1984
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the REGULAR MEETING of
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL September 11, 1984
PROSPECT HEIGHTS SCHOOL SITE REZONING
Recommendation
To continue the public hearing to a special meeting on 9-27-84.
Background
The School District has placed Prospect Heights School property for sale. Currently,
the property can be developed for 12 single family homes. The remainder of the
property is zoned open space.
The City has acquired the majority of the open space portion, however there are 5
parcels remaining in the open space designation. The School District desires to
maximize the value of those 5 parcels.
The Planning Commission has considered the rezoning of those properties and has
prepared a recommendation to the City Council..
This recommendation was made at their 9-4-84 meeting, The required noticing
requirements cannot be met in such a short period of time between Council and
Planning Commission meetings, therefore this public hearing must be continued.
Since the School District has requested this rezoning to be given a priority scheduling,
the City Council is being requested to consider a special meeting on 9- 27-84.
Pamela Sapetto
Planning Director
CPN,.0UR:
VAO
Gre ory T, eyer
City Manager
'1 /" otiM ; G' + j:ti wFi :f lT7 " V, �'I"�2: 4 �'�` +-1 r�r� s •-i 'S '� _
ism,�T
�J3�.1Se3 ?i Y31t 3 TF.i tG C3t] tit' . i :;<. piq 3: 9arr T' ,JMOM `rr JK5 C �..3»�. CT
yo
pM "•"',Ci3 `
��'•.�-.,� f4�G�� a"-:72 1� �' � �t �7f�� ��� •-�,;i� = .�;.1�' ��ss3 ..:�.5'� =.4' �s:�i,C� , �F�?#��
zvo1' �K�ILS� s : !` tl" IJa : J•� r-l�r. '' �.�.` - Ila- 1 f t+.'�. ''i- t
11
s.'F�Jc.7a,
4th ' k3''�!� ; `1?t4•� �`r�'yi'31r '°�� 2 T�� �cy
��.,. a !-' 1 •, _ i .t � � P 1.
ri T :rKy ^,rJt r'.r
.P .
r +.
_ ... ..,.., �. �l.��r:�.'I ..1�4_'^'�,i.a�'.r`�-_ .. �_,::,»����:i_�.-�_ _ _?..- _�s.:� �'ti- -fir .�.�.� - ':Sr a-•-� �.���..a
e
LF
, '} ..fir•i-
'1 /" otiM ; G' + j:ti wFi :f lT7 " V, �'I"�2: 4 �'�` +-1 r�r� s •-i 'S '� _
ism,�T
�J3�.1Se3 ?i Y31t 3 TF.i tG C3t] tit' . i :;<. piq 3: 9arr T' ,JMOM `rr JK5 C �..3»�. CT
yo
pM "•"',Ci3 `
��'•.�-.,� f4�G�� a"-:72 1� �' � �t �7f�� ��� •-�,;i� = .�;.1�' ��ss3 ..:�.5'� =.4' �s:�i,C� , �F�?#��
zvo1' �K�ILS� s : !` tl" IJa : J•� r-l�r. '' �.�.` - Ila- 1 f t+.'�. ''i- t
11
s.'F�Jc.7a,
4th ' k3''�!� ; `1?t4•� �`r�'yi'31r '°�� 2 T�� �cy
��.,. a !-' 1 •, _ i .t � � P 1.
ri T :rKy ^,rJt r'.r
.P .
r +.
_ ... ..,.., �. �l.��r:�.'I ..1�4_'^'�,i.a�'.r`�-_ .. �_,::,»����:i_�.-�_ _ _?..- _�s.:� �'ti- -fir .�.�.� - ':Sr a-•-� �.���..a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
ALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENT TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTIONS 401
ND 501 OF THE ZONING CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO SIDEYARD SETBACKS TO
ELINATE A MAXIMUM REQUIRED SIDEYARD SETBACK OF 5' FOR R-1 AND R-2
EVELOPMENTS.
WHEREAS, Sections 401 and 501 of the Zoning Code do not set a maximum sideyard
setback for R-1 and R-2 developments; and
WHEREAS, the City's requirement of a sideyard width of 10% of the lot width (with a
inimum of 31) creates a hardship for developments where the lot is very wide or the
parcel has an unusual configuration; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes that setting a maximum sideyard setback of 5'
ill create a more equitable requirement;
NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the Planning Commission be directed to research and assess sections
401 and 501 of the Zoning Code and arrive at a maximum sideyard
setback requirement for R-1 and R-2 developments.
Section 2. That the Planning Commission shall return their recommendation with
appropriate Zoning Code Amendments (if applicable) within forty (40)
days to the City Council
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , 1984.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach,
California.
ATTEST: CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY
F
September 7, 1984
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the REGULAR MEETING of
CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH September 11, 1984
SOUTH SCHOOL SITE REZONING
Recommendation
To review the Planning Commission recommendation for the rezoning of South School
property on 9-27-84.
Background
This item is scheduled for the next regular meeting of the City Council.
However,
because
of possible length of this
item, the Council may wish to consider
this at a
special
meeting. If the Council
sets a special meeting on 9-27-84 for
Prospect
Heights,
you may wish to consider
the South School rezoning issue at the same time.
Otherwise, the South School rezoning recommendation will be scheduled
for the
10-9-84
meeting.
ion
C CUR:
C
Gre ry . M er
Cit Manager
I U,
Pamela Sapetto
Planning Director
5
September 7, 1984
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the REGULAR MEETING of
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL September 11, 1984
PROSPECT HEIGHTS SCHOOL SITE REZONING
Recommendation
To continue the public hearing to a special meeting on 9-27-84.
Background
The School District has placed Prospect Heights School property for sale. Currently,
the property can be developed for 12 single family homes. The remainder of the
property is zoned open space.
The City has acquired the majority of the open space portion, however there are 5
parcels remaining in the open space designation. The School District desires to
maximize the value of those 5 parcels.
The Planning Commission has considered the rezoning of those properties and has
prepared a recommendation to the City Council..
This recommendation was made at their 9-4-84 meeting. The required noticing
requirements cannot be met in such a short period of time between Council and
Planning Commission meetings, therefore this public hearing must be continued.
Since the School District has requested this rezoning to be given a priority scheduling,
the City Council is being requested to consider a special meeting on 9- 27-84.
C CUR:
AO qrAk4
Gre ory T. eyer
City Manager
Pamela Sapetto
Planning Director
September 7, 1984
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the City Council of September 11, 1984
TAX-EXEMPT FINANCING - PARK PACIFIC SHOPPING CENTER
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City
Manager to proceed with developing approximately $3,000,000 in
Certificates of Participation tax exempt financing for a park-
ing structure at the Park Pacific Shopping Center (Alpha Beta,
etc.) subject to:
1) There being no City out of pocket expenses in the
putting together of this package.
2) The Developer (Alpha Beta - Skaggs and Mr. Roger
Bacon)
a) Bearing the costs of the financial
plan
b) Being fully responsible for the issues
debt (same conditions as with the Haagen
Development Company issue) such that
there is no City or Parking Authority
financial responsibility.
Background
Earlier this month the Developers (Alpha Beta - Skaggs and Mr.
Roger Bacon) submitted plans to the Building Department for an
expansion of the grocery store portion of the Park Pacific Shop-
ping Center. They desire to obtain tax-exempt financing for the
parking only portion of the project.
Analysis
As understood by staff, the Alpha Beta - Bacon request is exactly
like that recently processed for the Hermosa Plaza Center (Haagen).
Namely that the City and its Parking Authority utilize tax-exempt
financing for public parking; the developer being fully liable
for the financial backing of the project.
Much work must be done before this sort of issue could proceed
(see attached MSI letter dated August 22, 1984).
The City Council may recall that, in late 1983, we proceeded with
the Haagen financing knowing that in 1984 there would be new
federal legislation limiting the City's capability for issuing
Industrial Development Bonds. That legislation has been enacted
and Governor Deukmejian has issued his proclamation regarding
allocations (see attached).
The intent of this report is to seek authorization for the City
- Continued -
Y
lk
City Council Meeting of September 11, 1984
Tax-exempt Financing - Park Pacific Shopping Center
Page 2
Manager and staff to spend time in this endeavor but without
other direct City costs. Once a proposal is prepared it
would then be submitted to the City Council and the Parking
Authority for consideration.
01te C aA-,--( 64 x 04
Gre F-oryl T.Wyer
Cit Manag r
GTM/ld
cc: Mr. Roger Bacon
Attachments
a
4
t86T Ig I-snOny
uozss IWWOO AJOS tnpV 4q@(j tIUaOT t TU0 l auiq j qeG • E
V86T `pZ zsn2nV
paZ-ep uotsstUIWOD Saostnpy laaQ-ClUJOStTleO 'Z
':�86T `ZZ
jsn�ny pajup .zall-aT aq.n;Tlsul saatn.zag JuaazaOUu'eW •T
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
S g v I H a I v w Q u a 0 H 0 x 0 v a
Douglas Ayres, President
Rick Kermer, CPA, Vice President
Lee Weber, Vice President
James D. Williams, Vice President
Mr. Gregory T.
City of Hermosa
ivic Center
Hermosa Beach,
Dear Greg:
iii
Himanagement Services Institute
14790 FIRESTONE BLVD., LAMIRADA, CALIFORNIA 90638 714/670-0800
Meyer, City Manager
Beach
CA 90254
August 22, 1984
You have asked us to provide you with an informal opinion,
subject to confirming legal opinion, of the possibility of
constructing a parking structure with City tax exempt bonds to
serve the Alpha Beta Center at the northeast corner of Artesia
Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway. You also requested that we
provide you with both a time and coat estimate for bringing such
structure financing to fruition.
Basic Background
The owner of the Alpha Beta Center wishes to expand the Center.
To do so added parking is needed. The City owns the southwest
corner of the property. The owner of the property at the
northwest corner also reportedly is desirous of securing added
parking.
These facts very likely,combine to make the construction of a
parking structure in this location eligible for the use of
municipal tax exempt debt, without invocation of the City's
Industrial Development Bond (IDB) allocation. Were the latter to
be needed, however, the City probably has sufficient such
allocation to accomplish the financing through the IDB proceas,
at tax exempt interest rates. If the IDB route is needed, and a
greater IDB allocation is required -- both of which is unlikely
-- then an additional allocation can be sought to be transferred
from adjoining cities, Los Angeles County, or the State of
California.
The Process
If the City agrees to utilize tax exempt bonds with which to
finance the proposed parking structure and/or expand the surface
parking, the Developer would be responsible for having all
engineering and architecture work done for City approval. These
costs could be reimbursed from the bond issue, if .,desired. If
the structure is found to be legally not an IDB, then the City
would put such to bid. In the case of an IDB the Developer can
construct, under more general City supervision.
MMM
Alpha Beta Center Parking -- Page 2
The Bond Counsel would prepare the necessary lease agreements,
or other documents. Either the Parking Authority, or the City
could be involved, whichever is most desirable. The Developer
would, of course, approve such documents, since he/she would be
a party thereto.
Timing
Approximately three months would
process, after decision is made to
could proceed parallel with
document preparation. Usually the
that of the Developer securing an
of credit.
Financing
be required to accomplish the
proceed. The financing work
engineering and construction
most time consuming process is
acceptable irrevocable letter
The Developer would provide the City with a Letter of Credit in
amount of the principal and interest, and also sign appropriate
leases with the City in either the IDB or City parking/leaseback
arrangement. The premium for the Letter of Credit can be paid
from bond proceeds. In an arrangement of this nature such
usually amounts to 1.5% per year.
The debt service for the issue would be paid by the Developer in
the form of lease payments, under either the IDB or parking
lease scenario. The lease payments would be equal to the debt
service on the bonds, plus a small City processing charge.
Merrill Lynch Capital Markets would provide managing underwriter
service and, if appropriate in their judgment, buy the bonds.
It may be determined by Bond Counsel and Underwriter that a
Feasibility Report would be necessary, in which case Economics
Research Associates should be retained, since it already has
data on parking demands in Hermosa Beach. Such Feasibility
Report probably would not be needed.
All the herein information is, of course, subject to Bond
Counsel opinion.
Estimated Debt Service
For estimation purposes for the use of the Developer to prepare
his pro forma, equivalent municipal bonds currently are being
sold at around an 11% interest rate. This translates into
approximately $124,000 of annual debt service for $1,000,000 for
20 years. The 25 year rate on the same amount would be around
$117,000 annually. Lower principal amounts proportionatly would
result in slightly higher interest rates; larger amounts
somewhat less in ratio to the 01 million estimated rate.
Alpha Beta Center Parking -- Page 3
91
&Atim4ted float,
You have asked what the necessary preparatory work would cost up
to the point of bond issue. Such coats could be recovered from
the issue, if study results warrant such an issue, and such
reimbursement is desired.
The following is a rough cost estimate of the elements and
participants, excluding any engineering, architectural or other
technical or construction work. This estimate covers only the
work up to the point of bond issue.
Bond Counsel .............. 530,000
Financial Advisory Service ..... 15,000
Feasibility Study Cif needed; .. 5.000
TOTAL ................... 550,000
Conclusion
We would be glad to work with the City and the Developer, if
decided and desired. Should you need additional information,
please let me know.
Sincerely,
1
DOUGLAS W. AYRES
President
HERMOSA BEACH'
STATE OF CALIFORNIA —'
MEMBERS
CALIFORNIA DEBT ADVISORY COMMISSION J—,M IJrvun.CKS—en
915 CAPITOL MALL ROOM 400 Stety Treuww
P.O. BOX 1919 G—q* a—.-11en
SACRAMENTO. CALIFORNIA 95609 Go—. c+
TELEPHONE: (916) 324-2585 KMS«^ Cozy
August 24,-1984
TO: City Managers and Administrators
FROM:
SUBJ:
California Debt Limit Allocation Committee
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND ISSUANCE
Stir. Conrto4e,
Room G. Be.vrM
Stare S.—fa,
Jun- F Fo.en
State ser+ero•
J,m Cie
Stare Ar ombPr"n
Frmct J ,/oien
St►te Aeaamb"&n
TTwnve C. Ruth
Treuurw. Car N 7a1m
THE FOLLOWING IS A QUICK UPDATE ON THE CALIFORNIA DEBT LIMIT
ALLOCATION COMMITTEE AND THE STATE'S ALLOCATION SYSTEM FOR
THE ISSUANCE OF PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS. PLEASE EXCUSE THIS
MODIFIED "FORM LETTER," BUT WE WANTED TO SEND THIS
INFORMATION TO YOU AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.
On Thursday, August 16, 1984, the California Debt Limit Allocation
Committee (the "Committee") held its first meeting. (The
Committee was created through executive proclamation on July 19,
1984 by Governor George Deukmejian to oversee the allocation
system for the issuance of "private activity bonds" in California.
As you may know, the issuance of private activity bonds is limited
by the enactment of the federal Tax Reform Act of 1984.)
At the Committee's first meeting, the following actions were
taken:
1. 1984 State Ceiling: The 1934 State ceiling for the
issuance of private activity bonds was announced. The
ceiling is $3,776,100,000.
2. Local Allocations: Individual allocations for cities and
counties were also announced by the Committee. These
allocation figures first appeared in the August 8, 1984
"Special Edition" of our newsletter Debt Line. (Please
call if you did not receive a copy of the "Special
Edition" and are interested in a copy.)
Your city's allocation for the issuance of private
activity bonds in 1984 is $_965,000
3. Reporting and Application Forms: Reporting and
application forms were approved by the Committee.
(Copies of these forms are enclosed.)
Memo to City Managers and Administrators
Page 2
August 24, 1934
We are requesting that each local jurisdiction receiving
an allocation complete and submit the "Summary: 1984
Issuance of Private Activity Bonds" (the blue form) and
the "ReDert of Proposed Issuance of Private Activity
Bonds" a white form by September 21, 19 4. Completion
and submittal of these forms will preliminarily advise
the Committee of the potential unmet private activity
bond allocation needs of local governments.
The golden -colored "Report of Action Taken with Respect
to Private Activity Bonds" must be filed by an issuer
within 15 days of: 1) the issuance of private activity
bonds; 2) the transfer of an allocation; or 3) the
completion of a carryforward election.
Lastly, we have enclosed an "Application for an
Allocation for the Issuance of Private Activity Bonds
from the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee."
This form is to be used by both State and local agencies
which are interested in obtaining a transfer of the
State's bond limit. (We will advise you of the next
meeting of the Committee as soon as it is scheduled.)
We hope that this update on the Committee's first meeting has
been helpful. Please call us if you have any questions about the
,meeting or the enclosed forms. We look forward to receiving your
completed forms (the "Summary" and "Report" forms) so that we
will have an indication of the planned level of your 1984
issuance of private activity bonds.
Details on future meetings of the Committee as well as any other
new developments will be provided through our newsletter or -
special mailings, but please do not hesitate to call in the
meantime.
Sincerely,
1 ERESA M. MOLINARI
Policy Advisor
cc: Chief Financial Officer
« b .pan a S(., !A �.i) ., I:E, i'�,.i. ER S € RA I �.' s :� I,
.IFORNIA Date
: pgtou n i,t e,.li .in i tie ,""xt2li➢tp n ie:a)ST
EBTDEBT- LINE
:.
"�O'MMIS\SION'
RY
;f
1.,LrIre S fps€N lfe Mllv 1. 201"
Nor
SPECIAL EDITION
CDAC DOES SPECIAL EDITION ON
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS
August 8, 1984
As most of our Debt Line readers know, a $150 per capita State
ceiling on the issuance of "private activity bonds" was imposed
by the Tax Reform Act of 1984, which was signed by President
Ronald Reagan on July 18, 1984. This per capita limit equals a
State volume ceiling of $3,776,100,000 for the State of
California in 1984. (Private activity bonds means all industrial
development bonds and student loan bonds.)
This special edition of Debt Line focuses exclusively on this new
federal law and the allocation system which was established by
executive proclamation --signed by Governor George Deukmejian on
July 19, 1984. We hope that the information contained in this
newsletter will be of assistance to our readers and will help to
clarify some of the questions concerning this new federal limit.
The contents of this newsletter include:
--an announcement of the first meeting (on August 16th in
Sacramento) of the California Debt Limit Allocation
Committee which was created by the Governor's proclamation
to oversee the State's allocation;
--a detailed description of "The Allocation System for
Private Activity Bonds in the State of California," which
begins on page 3; ,
--sample calculations which describe how individual
allocations were computed;
--a listing of the "Preliminary Allocations for the Issuance
of Private Activity Bonds in 1984" by individual city and
county, which begins on page 14; and
--a copy of the Governor's proclamation which establishes
the allocation system for California.
We hope this newsletter is helpful. Please call our office (at
916/324-2585) if you have any questions or if you are unable to
replicate our calculations and allocations (pages 10-27). $
3
FIRST MEETING OF NEW ALLOCATION COMMITTEE SCHEDULED
The first meeting of the California Debt Limit Allocation
Committee has been scheduled as follows:
DATE: Thursday, August 16, 1984
TIME: 2:00 p.m.
LOCATION: Resources Agency Auditorium
1416 Ninth Street, First Floor
Sacramento, California
The Committee, which was created by executive proclamation on
July 19, 1984, is chaired by the State Treasurer and also
includes the Governor, or in his absence the Director of Finance,
and the State Controller.
The agenda for this first meeting follows:
1. Roll Call
2. Discussion of Governor's Proclamation and Allocation
Figures for the State of California and Cities and
Counties.
3. Consideration of Proposed Reporting Form
4. Other Business
5. Adjournment
******************************************************************
TABLE OF CONTENTS
California Debt Limit Allocation
Committee Meeting Agenda ............................ 2
Allocation System for Private Activity
Bonds in the State of California .................... 3-10
Sample Allocation Calculations Described ................. 10-13
Preliminary Allocations for the Issuance
of Private Activity Bonds in 1984 ................... 14-27
Governor's Proclamation .................................. 28-31
-2-
ALLOCATION SYSTEM FOR PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS
IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Editor's Note: The following guest article
was written by Robert P. Feyer of Orrick,
Herrington and SutcLiffe, a Professional
Corporation.
On July 18, 1984, President Reagan signed into law the Tax Reform
Act of 1984 (the "Act"), which .imposes a $150 per capita state
ceiling on "private activity bonds." On July 19, Governor
Deukmejian signed an executive Proclamation setting in place a
system for allocating this volume cap between and among state and
local entities in California (thereby generally superseding the
allocation system set forth in the Act). This article describes
the allocation system established by the Governor's Proclamation.
It also discusses two other important aspects of the allocation
system contained in the federal Act: (1) the provisions for
"carry -forward" of unused allocations to future years for specific
projects, and (2) the "priority" system for certain projects with
inducement resolutions enacted prior to October 19, 1983.
1. Bond Issues Covered by the Allocation System
The allocation system applies to all covered "private activity
bonds" issued within the State of California in calendar year
1984 and thereafter. Unless the bond issue is exempted, as
described below, it will be necessary for the issuer of the bonds
to have and to use part of the State's total volume cap in order
for the bonds to be tax-exempt.
"Private activity bonds" covered by the cap requirement means all
industrial development bonds (including "exempt facility" bonds,
"small issug" bonds,and bonds for industrial parks) and student
loan bonds,—V except for those bonds described below. Bonds which
are not "industrial development bonds" for federal tax purposes
(e.g. bonds for nonprofit hospitals or educational institutions)
are not subject to the cap. The federal Act specifically excludes
from the cap the following industrial development bonds:
1/ Although the Act puts student loan bonds under the State
cap, the many special rules for student loan bonds are not
discussed in this article, which is directed to IDBS only.
-3- ti
(a) Any bond issued on or before December
31, 1984, provided that an "inducement resolution
or other comparable preliminary approval" was
adopted for the bond issue 1aefore June 19, 1984.
(b) Bonds to provide multifamily rental
housing or bonds exempt under Section 11(b) of the
Housing Act of 1937.
(c) Refunding bonds, provided the face
amount of the refunding bonds does not exceed the
then -outstanding principal amount of the
obligations to be refunded. Any "new money" in
the refunding bonds will have to receive an
allocation unless it is otherwise exempt.
(d) Bonds to finance convention or trade
show facilities, or airports, docks, wharves, or
mass commuting facilities or vehicles, provided
that such facilities or vehicles are owned (for
federal tax purposes) by a governmental entity
(such that no private taxpayer is able to obtain
tax benefits from ownership of such facilities or
vehicles) and provided further that any rents
charged to tenants of such facilities are not
front -loaded to achieve an effect more accelerated
than a straight-line rent over the life of the
property.
2. Certain Definitions Under the Governor's Proclamation
In order to understand the remaining description of the Governor's
Proclamation, it is useful to keep in mind the following
definitions:
(a) "Committee" means a new committee
created under the Proclamation called the
"California Debt Limit Allocation Committee." The
Committee consists of the State Treasurer as
Chairman, the State Controller and the Governor
or, in his absence, the Director of Finance.
(b) "Local Agency" means any political
subdivision or other unit of local government
empowered to issue Private Activity Bonds.
(c) "State Agency" means the State of
California and all state entities, authorities or
agencies empowered t;- issue Private Activity`
Bonds, including joint powers authorities of which
the State or any State Agency is a member, and
also including any non-profit corporation
empowered to issue student loan bonds or Private
Activity Bonds on behalf of a State Agency.
(d) "Private Activity Bond" means the
definition contained in the federal Act, as
described above in Section 1 of this article.
(e) "Private Activity Bond Limit" means any
part of the State's total ceiling which is
allocated pursuant to the Proclamation (including
transfers) to any Local Agency or State Agency,
which the Local Agency or State Agency may utilize
in order to issue its Private Activity Bonds.
3. The State Ceiling
For calendar years 1984, 1985 and 1986, the aggregate amount of
Private Activity Bonds which may be issued within the State of
California (not including bonds which are exempted as described
above in Section 1) is equal to $150 per capita. The calculation
is based upon the U.S. Department of Census' most recent estimate
of the State's population made before the start of the calendar
year. We expect the total "State Ceiling" for 1984 will be about
$3,776,000,000. For years after 1986, the ceiling drops to $100
per capita. The Committee will determine and announce the overall
State Ceiling for each year.
It is worth noting that the federal Act provides a full year's
allocation for 1984, while it also provides an exemption from the
cap requirement for most bonds which will be issued in 1984 (so
long as there was an inducement resolution before June 19). Thus,
it will be much easier for an issuer to find available allocation
in the remainder of 1984 for those projects which did not have a
pre -June 19 inducement resolution, and for projects eligible for
"carry-foward" elections (see Section 9).
4. The Allocation System
The basic allocation scheme contained in the Governor's
Proclamation is as follows:
(a) 50% of the State Ceiling is allocated
to State Agencies. The further allocation of this
amount (called the "State Bond Limit") is
delegated to the Committee.
` -5- U.
(b) 35% of the State Ceiling is allocated
to cities and counties (for their unincorporated
areas) on a per capita basis.
(c) 15% of the State Ceiling is allocated
directly to counties on a per capita basis, based
upon their entire population.
The local shares --(b) and (c) above --will be allocated on the
basis of relative population shares of cities and counties as
announced in the State Department of Finance's regularly published
"Population Estimates of California Cities and Counties." The
estimates published on May 1, 1984 will govern the 1984
allocations. For each future year, the local shares will be based
on the most recent Department of Finance estimate published before
the start of the calendar year.
Any governmental unit receiving an allocation has the right to
transfer part or all of its allocation to any other State Agency
or Local Agency (subject to certain limitations on counties
described in Section 6 below), on whatever terms and conditions
the granting unit determines. Any transferred allocation may be
used by the recipient for a "carry -forward" election (see Section
9 below) unless the grantor restricts the transfer otherwise.
However, no recipient of an allocation from the State Committee
may transfer that allocation to another governmental unit without
the Committee's consent.
5. Issuance of Bonds by State Agencies
Each State Agency, before it issues bonds, must apply to the
Committee to receive an allocation of a portion of the State.Bond
Limit. The Committee may make allocations to State Agencies upon
whatever terms and conditions the Committee may determine, which
may either be for a specific project, or may be an aggregate
dollar amount which the State Agency may utilize under its own
discretion. Furthermore, the State Agency may utilize any
allocation received from the Committee to make a "carry -forward"
election for a project for future bond issuance, unless the
Committee has expressly prohibited the State Agency from using its
allocation for a carry -forward.
6. Issuance of Bonds by Local Agencies
Under the Governor's Proclamation, each city and each county in
the State will receive a certain dollar amount of allocation (its
Private Activity Bond Limit). Cities and counties may therefore
issue Private Activity Bonds up to the amount of their Private
Activity Bond Limit without requirement of any further approval by
0 U.
any other governmental entity. The Proclamation requires that the
bond resolution or other final action authorizing the issuance of
bonds specify that a portion of the issuer's Private Activity Bond
Limit is being utilized for that bond issue. (This rule also
applies to State Agencies.)
Certain units of local government which issue Private .Activity
Bonds are not covered by the initial allocation. This includes
industrial development authorities, redevelopment agencies,
parking authorities, joint powers authorities and many types of
special districts and nonprofit corporations. Any such entity
which is created by, or associated closely with, a particular city
or county would be expectd to receive its allocation by
application to and transfer of part of the Private Activity Bond
Limit from such city or county. A joint powers authority, for
instance, could be expected to receive allocations from some or
all of its member agencies which have allocations, and a .regional
district could be expected to seek allocations from the cities and
counties which it overlaps.
If a city does not have sufficient allocation to issue bonds
(directly or through a subsidiary authority or other related
issuer), or if a special district is not able to receive an
allocation from one or more cities within whose boundaries it
operates, it is expected that the first step for receiving an
allocation would be to seek a transfer from the county. It is the
intent of the Governor's Proclamation that the 15% special
allocation made directly to the counties should be used as a
reserve to resolve allocation problems within the county.
Specifically, the Proclamation requires the counties to use this
15% allocation for county projects to the extent the county's
share of the 35% allocation is insufficient, for transfer to Local
Agencies located within the county, and for transfer to joint
powers agencies and regional districts whose territory includes
part or all of the county. A county may not transfer any part of
.this 15% allocation outside the county unless the Board of
Supervisors makes a determination that it does not expect to need
to utilize all of the 15% allocation within the county as
described in the preceding sentence.
If the county does not have sufficient remaining allocation, Local
Agencies within the county (including the county itself) would
need either to seek a transfer of excess allocation from some
other Local Agency elsewhere in the State, or to apply to the
Committee for a transfer of a portion of the State Bond Limit.
The Committee has not yet announced any standards or criteria
which it would use in deciding whether to grant transfers of a
portion of the State Bond Limit to Local Agencies. However, it is
expected that there will be substantial excess at the state level
which could be tapped.
-7-
7. Reporting Requirements
The Governor's Proclamation requires that each State Agency and
Local Agency make a report to the Committee within 15 days of (i)
the issuance of any Private Activity Bonds, (ii) any action to
transfer allocations to another government entity or (iii) making
a "carry -forward" election. The Committee thereby intends to
maintain accurate records of the availability of allocations
throughout the State. Furthermore, the Proclamation permits the
Committee to seek other information from potential issuers of
Private Activity Bonds, including information on planned future
issuances. The Committee hopes by receiving this information to
get an advance estimate of the potential amount of requests which
local governments may make to the Committee for transfer of a
portion of the State Bond Limit.
There is an additional provision in the Proclamation which
requires certain reports to be made to the Committee with respect
to any Private Activity Bonds issued between June 19 and July 19,
the date the Proclamation was issued. This report is designed to
close certain potential technical gaps which might exist in the
allocation system.
8. Termination Date of Governor's Proclamation
The Governor's Proclamation does not contain any specific
termination date. Under the federal Act, however, the
Proclamation would cease to be effective upon the effective date
of any legislation passed by the State Legislature covering the
same subject. It is not yet known whether any effort will be made
before the end of the 1984 Legislature to enact a statutory
allocation system, but it is likely that such legislation will be
introduced in 1985.
9. "Carry -Forward" Elections
The federal Act contains a useful provision which allows any
entity of government which has unused allocations in any calendar
year to make an election to "carry -forward" a designated portion
of its Private Activity Bond Limit to be used to issue bonds for a
specific project any time during the next succeeding three years
(or six years in the case of a pollution control facility). This
carry -forward rule only applies to exempt facilities projects
T_e.g., sports stadiums, convention or trade show facilities,
airports, docks, wharves, sewage or solid waste disposal
facilities, pollution control facilities, local electric energy
projects, etc.). The carry -"--ward provision is not available for
$1,000,000 or $10,000,000 "sma-il issue" bonds for typical
commercial or industrial projects. Also, as noted, the carry-
forward must be specific to a designated project, and once it is
made it is irrevocable. Therefore, if a carry -forward election is
made and the project is later abandoned, that amount of allocation
will be lost.
Obviously, the carry -forward provision can be very useful, to the
extent it is applicable, in saving future allocations. This is
especially true since, because of the liberal transition rules,
the demand for use of 1984 allocations will be much lower than
normal. Issuers taking proper steps can effectively utilize
unused 1984 allocations for planned, or even potential, exempt
facilities projects, where the bonds would not be issued until a
later year. This would free up allocation in those later years
for other projects. As noted in Section 4 above, an issuer may
seek a transfer of allocation from another governmental entity for
the purpose of collecting a large enough unused allocation to make
a carry -forward election, so long as the transferring entity does
not prohibit such a use.
It should be noted that the federal Act specifically mandates that
the Secretary of the Treasury shall specify the manner of making
these elections. Hopefully, some regulations will be issued for
this purpose before the end of the year.
10. Priority For Certain Pre -October 1983 Bonds
There is a provision in the federal Act which is designed to give
priority in the use of allocations to certain projects. In order
to be eligible for this priority, a project must have both (i)
received an inducement resolution before October 19, 1983, and
(ii) commenced construction, or have been the subject of a
significant binding commitment, before October 19, 1983. A
significant commitment would normally mean a binding contract
representing at least 20% of project costs. Sponsors of projects
meeting both of these tests have.the right to make a "reservation"
for priority in the use of allocations by the issuer for the
calendar year to which the inducement resolution relates. (If
bonds for the project are issued in 1984, the bond issue would be
exempt from the cap in any case because it had a pre -June 19, 1984
inducement resolution.)
In order for a project sponsor to utilize this priority, the
sponsor is merely required to send a letter to the issuer within
30 days after the date of enactment of the federal Act (i.e., by
August 17, 1984) stating that the project sponsor "intends to
claim its rights" under this provision (technically referred to as
"Section 631(a)(3) of the Tax Reform Act of 1984"). If an issuer
receives a proper letter under this priority provision (and has
verified that the project sponsor is eligible, as described
-9-
IN.
above), the issuer must reserve part of its allocation for the
calendar year in which the bonds were to be issued pursuant to the
inducement resolution for that project. Failure to comply with
this priority rule will result in that issuer losing an equivalent
amount of its allocation in the subsequent calendar year. If it
happens that an issuer receives more requests under this paragraph
than it has allocation for a particular year, it must rank the
applicants and give the priority allocation to those projects
which have made the most significant expenditures before October
19, 1983. The issuer is not under any obligation to affirmatively
seek transfers of allocation from other sources in order to
service all of the projects which may be entitled to a priority.
However, it would appear that if the issuer does obtain transfer
of allocations beyond its normal allocation under the basic
allocation scheme,it should first service the priority
allocations, and only service other projects when all priority
allocations have been taken care of.
It is obvious that thl5 provision contains a number of ambiguities
and judgment questions. It should be noted that there appears to
be no legal obligation on the issuer's part to notify holders of
inducement resolutions that they have certain rights under the
Act, but issuers should be careful not to discriminate in giving
information or advice among project sponsors. For their own
guidance, issuers would be well advised immediately to review
their records and identify all still outstanding inducement
resolutions dating before October. 19, 1983.
*****************************************************************
SAMPLE ALLOCATION CALCULATIONS DESCRIBED
The Tax Reform Act of 1984 specifies a per capita limit on
private activity bonds and indicates how the State volume cap
must be calculated. This article illustrates how that
calculation has been made and also describes how individual city
and county allocations (beginning on page 14 of this newsletter)
were computed.
* * * * * * * * * *
State Ceiling: The new federal law specifies that a state can
issue up to $150 per capita of private activity bonds. The law
further specifies that the population figure to be used in the
calculation of the state cap should be the most recent estimate
of the resident population published by the Bureau of the Census
before the beginning of the calendar year.
zi olm
For California, the 1984 State ceiling is calculated as follows:
$150 x 25,L74,000(a) _ $3,776,100,000
(a)25,174,000 represents the Bureau of Census' most recent
estimate of California's population --dated July 1983.
* * * * * * * * * *
State Bond Limit: Of the total State volume cap of
$3,776,100,000, 50 percent is allocated to the State of
California and all State entities, including joint powers
authorities of which the State'or its agency or instrumentality
is a member --under the provisions of the Governor's proclamation.
Thus, the State bond limit is the State ceiling multiplied by 50
percent:
$3,776,100,000 x 0.50 = $1,888,050,000
Local Bond Limit: Of the total State volume cap of
$3,776,100,000, 50 percent is allocated to local government.
$3,776,100,000 x 0.50 = $1,888,050,000
This local bond limit is further split into two separate
a11_oca—ti ons. Thirty-five 3 _percent of the State volume cap is
allocated to cities (for their populations), counties (for the
populations of their unincorporated areas), and the one city and
county (San Francisco) in the State. Fifteen (15) percent of the
State volume cap is allocated to counties as a countywide
"reserve" on the basis of their total populations.
Both of these allocations are further described below --the 35
percent allocation in the City, City and County, and County Bond
Limits section and the 15 percent allocation in the County -
"Reserve" Bond Limit section.
* * * * * * * * * *
City, City and County, and County Bond Limits (35% of the State
Ceili_ng_: Of the total State volume cap of $3,776,100,000, 35
percent is allocated to each city, county (for its unincorporated
area), and city and county --under the provisions of the
Governor's proclamation.
Thus, the aggregate limit under this section is:
$3,776,100,000 x 0.35 = $1,321,635,000
-11-
For an individual city, city and _county, or county (for its
un_inco_rpora_ted area T, the allocation calculation has two steps.
These two steps are necessary to take into consideration the
latest available information concerning population shifts within
the State.
Thus, the individual limit for a city is calculated as follows.
The City of Oakland is used in this example.
The first step involves calculating a percentage which indicates
the relative share of the total State population which the city
(or county or city and county) represents. The Governor's
proclamation states that this percentage must be calculated by
taking as the numerator the most recent State population estimate
of the city, and by taking as the denominator the most recent
State population estimate of the State. For 1984, the figures to
be used are January 1, 1984 estimates which were published by the
Department of Finance on May 1, 1984. (These population figures
are listed in the tables beginning on page 14 of this
newsletter.)
The result of this first step (using Oakland as an example) is:
351,600 (a) = 1.383418649396200%
25,415,300
(a)The numerator is the January 1, 1984 population estimate
for the City of Oakland (published by the Department of
Finance on May 1, 1984); the denominator, the January 1,
1984 population estimate for the State (also published
by the Department of Finance on May 1, 1984). (All of
the relative population share calculations were carried
out to 15 places.)
In the second step, the percentage figure obtained above is
simply applied to the aggregate bond limit (representing 35
percent of the State ceiling) which was calculated earlier. This
dollar amount is rounded off to the nearest thousand.
1.383418649396200% x $1,321,635,000 = $18,284,000
This amount represents the private activity bond allocation
available to an individual city --in this case, the City of
Oakland. Other allocations can be calculated by following this
example.
* * * * * * * * * *
County "Reserve" Bond Limit (15% of the State Ceiling): This
calculation generally follows the calculation +in the City, City
and County, and County section above.
-12-
WP
Of the total State volume cap of $3,776,100,000, 15 percent is
allocated to each county (for its entire population) --under the
provisions of the Governor's proclamation.
Thus, the aggregate county "reserve" bond limit is:
$3,776,100,000 x 0.15 = $566,415,000
To determine the allocation for an individual county, the same
two-step process used above is followed. In the following
example, the County of Alameda is used.
First, the relative population share is figured:
1,172,300(x) = 4.612575889326500%
25,415,300
(a)Again, the numerator is the January 1, 1984 population
estimate for the County of Alameda (published by the
Department of Finance on May 1, 1984); the denominator,
the January 1, 1984 population estimate for the State
(also published by the Department of Finance on May„ 1,
1984).
Then, this relative population share figure is multiplied by the
aggregate limit available to counties and is rounded off.
4.612575889326500% x $566,415,000 = $26,126,000
This amount represents the private activity bond allocation
available to an individual county for the county "reserve" bond
limit --in this case, the County of Alameda. Other allocations
can be calculated by following this example.
* * * * * * * * * *
We hope that this explanation has been helpful and not too
confusing. If you are unable to replicate any of the figures
contained in the tables beginning on page 14 of this newsletter,
please call us. We want to ensure that the allocation figures
are accurate! $
-13-
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONbS IN 1984(1)
COUNTY(2) CITY/UNINCORPORATED POPULATION(4) PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND
AREA�1(3 ) ALLOCATION(5)
ALAMEDA
1,172,300
$26,126,000
ALAMEDA
74,900
$3,895,000
ALBANY
15,300
$796,000
BERKELEY
106,500
$5,538,000
DUBLIN
15,550
$809,000
EMERYVILLE
3,970
$206,000
FREMONT
143,200
$7,447,000
HAYWARD
98,700
$5,133,000
LIVERMORE
51,900
$2,699,000
NEWARK
35,600
$1,851,000
OAKLAND
351,600
$18,284,000
PIEDMONT
10,550
$549,000
PLEASANTON
38,350
$1,994,000
SAN LEANDRO
66,400
$3,453,000
UNION CITY
45,950
$2,389,000
UNINCORPORATED
113,900
$5,923,000
ALPINE
1,170
$26,000
UNINCORPORATED
1,170
$61,000
AMAppR
21,550
$480,000
AMADOR
140
$7,000
IONE
2,230
$116,000
JACKSON
2,650
$138,000
PLYMOUTH
690
$36,000
SUTTER CREEK
1,730
$90,000
UNINCORPORATED
14,100
$733,000
BUTTE
157,100
$3,501,000
BIGGS
1,430
$74,000
CHICO
29,700
$1,544,000
GRIDLEY
4,190
$218,000
OROVILLE
9,925
$516,000
PARADISE
23,900
$1,243,000
UNINCORPORATED
88,000
$4,576,000
CALAVERAS
24,850
$554,000
ANGELS
2,180
$113,000
UNINCORPORATED
22,650
$1,178,000
COLUSA
14,200
$316,000
COLUSA
4,340
$226,000
WILLIAMS
1,750
$91,000
UNINCORPORATED
8,100
$421,000
-14-
s
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THfIjSSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN 1984 -CONTINUED
COUNTY(2) CITY/UNINCORPORATED POPULATION(4) PRIVATE_ ACTIVITY BOND
------- ----- -- p,REA(3) __ .__ _--------__-_-- - ALLOCATION�5 )
CONTRA COSTA
693,700
$15,460,000
ANTIOCH
46,550
$2,421,000
BRENTWOOD
5,150
$268,000
CLAYTON
4,490
$233,000
CONCORD
105,000
$5,460,000
DANVILLE
27,550
$1,433,000
EL CERRITO
23,250
$1,209,000
HERCULES
7,300
$380,000
LAFAYETTE
22,550
$1,173,000
MARTINEZ
25,300
$1,316,000
MORAGA
14,850
$772,000
PINOLE
14,550
$757,000
PITTSBURG
38,600
$2,007,000
PLEASANT HILL
27,350
$1,422,000
RICHMOND
76,900
$3,999,000
SAN PABLO
21,200
$1,102,000
WALNUT CREEK
57,300
$2,980,000
UNINCORPORATED
175,800
$9,142,000
DEL NORTE
18,550
$413,000
CRESCENT CITY
3,310
$172,000
UNINCORPORATED
15,250
$793,000
EL DORADO
97,500
$2,173,000
PLACERVILLE
7,150
$372,000
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
21,500
$11113,000
UNINCORPORATED
68,800
$3,578,000
FRESNO
558,600
$12,449,000
CLOVIS
37,400
$1,945,000
COALINGA
7,450
$387,000
FIREBAUGH
4,050
$211,000
FOWLER
2,740
$142,000
FRESNO
265,200
$13,791,000
HURON
3,520
$183,000
KERMAN
4,040
$210,000
KINGSBURG
5,800
$302,000
MENDOTA
6,075
$316,000
ORANGE COVE
4,350
$226,000
PARLIER
6,050
$315,000
REEDLEY
12,850
$668,000
SANGER
13,600
$707,000
SAN JOAQUIN
2,110
$110,000
SELMA
12,500
$650,000
UNINCORPORATED
170,900
$8,887,000
-15-
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN 1984(1) -CONTINUED
COUNTY(2)
CITY/UNINCORPORATED
POPULATION(4)
PRIVATE_ACTIVITY
--
------AREA( JT-__-
----- -
_BOND
- CATIj---
ALLO
GLENN
22,650
$505,000
ORLAND
4,490
$233,000
WILLOWS
5,075
$264,000
UNINCORPORATED
13,100
$681,000
HUMBOLDT
111,300
$2,480,000
ARCATA
13,950
$725,000
BLUE LAKE
1,240
$64,000
EUREKA
24,600
$1,279,000
FERNDALE
1,440
$75,000
FORTUNA
4,025
$417,000
RIO DELL
2,780
$145,000
TRINIDAD
410
$21,000
UNINCORPORATED
58,800
$3,058,000
IMPERIAL
101,700
$2,267,000
BRAWLEY
17,350
$902,000
CALEXICO
16,450
$855,000
CALIPATRIA
2,710
$141,000
EL CENTRO
26,750
$1,391,000
HOLTVILLE
4,660
$242,000
IMPERIAL
3,730
$194,000
WESTMORLAND
1,780
$93,000
UNINCORPORATED
28,300
$1,472,000
INYO
18,300
$408,000
BISHOP
3,440
$179,000
UNINCORPORATED
14,900
$775,000
KERN
455,000
$10,140,000
ARVIN
7,450
$387,000
BAKERSFIELD
129,700
$6,745,000
CALIFORNIA CITY
2,990
$155,000
DELANO
18,550
$965,000
MARICOPA
1,190
$62,000
MCFARLAND
6,075
$316,000
RIDGECREST
22,150
$1,152,000
SHAFTER
7,425
$386,000
TAFT
5,975
$311,000
TEHACHAPI
4,340
$226,000
WASCO
10,800
$562,000
UNINCORPORATED
238,400
$12,397,000
-16-
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN 1984(1) -CONTINUED
COUNTY(2) CITY/UNINCORPORATED POPULATION(4) PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND
- -- - �------- AREA�3) -� ___-- -.- ---- ALLOCAT ION �5 �-
KINGS
80,700
$1,799,000
AVENAL
4,370
$227,000
CORCORAN
6,950
$361,000
HANFORD
23,450
$1,219,000
LEMOORE
10,700
$556,000
UNINCORPORATED
35,250
$1,833,000
LAKE
44,000
$981,000
CLEARLAKE
9,750
$507,000
LAKEPORT
3,910
$203,000
UNINCORPORATED
30,350
$1,578,000
LASSEN
23,850
$532,000
SUSANVILLE
6,625
$345,000
UNINCORPORATED
17,250
$897,000
LOS ANGELES
7,866,900
$175,325,000
ALHAMBRA
69,200
$3,599,000
AGOURA HILLS
15,550
$809,000
ARCADIA
47,550
$2,473,000
ARTESIA
14,450
$751,000
AVALON
2,300
$120,000
AZUSA
32,850
$1,708,000
BALDWIN PARK
56,400
$2,933,000
BELL
27,000
$1,404,000
BELLFLOWER
56,200
$2,922,000
BELL GARDENS
36,250
$1,885,000
BEVERLY HILLS
33,150
$1,724,000
BRADBURY
850
$44,000
BURBANK
87,500
$4,550,000
CARSON
84,600
$4,399,000
CERRITOS
55,200
$2,870,000
CLAREMONT
34,250
$1,781,000
COMMERCE
11,900
$619,000
COMPTON
87,000
$4,524,000
COVINA
39,300
$2,044,000
CUDAHY
19,400
$1,009,000
CULVER CITY
38,900
$2,023,000
DOWNEY
83,500
$4,342,000
DUARTE
19,550
$1,017,000
EL MONTE
88,900
$4,623,000
EL SEGUNDO
14,350
$746,000
GARDENA
47,600
$2,475,000
GLENDALE
147,100
$7,649,000
GLENDORA
40,050
$2,083,000
-17-
r.
COUNTY(2)
LOS ANGELES
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN 1984(1) -CONTINUED
CITY/UNINCORPORATED POPULATION(4) PRIVATE _ACTIVITY _BOND
Jikl�ACTT--- ALLOCATIONTST-
(CONTINUED) ---- ALLOCATIONT5j
(CONTINUED)
HAWAIIAN GARDENS
HAWTHORNE
HERMOSA BEACH
HIDDEN HILLS
HUNTINGTON PARK
INDUSTRY
INGLEWOOD
IRWINDALE
LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE
LA HABRA HEIGHTS
LAKEWOOD
LA MIRADA
LANCASTER
LA PUENTE
LA VERNE
LAWNDALE
LOMITA
LONG BEACH
LOS ANGELES
LYNWOOD
MANHATTAN BEACH
MAYWOOD
MONROVIA
MONTEBELLO
MONTEREY PARK
NORWALK
PALMDALE
PALOS VERDES ESTATES
PARAMOUNT
PASADENA
PICO RIVERA
POMONA
RANCHO PALOS VERDES
REDONDO BEACH
ROLLING HILLS
ROLLING HILLS ESTATE
ROSEMEAD
SAN DIMAS
SAN FERNANDO
SAN GABRIEL
SAN MARINO
SANTA FE SPRINGS
SANTA MONICA
SIERRA MADRE
SIGNAL HILL
11,450
$595,000
57,900
$3,011,000
18,550
$965,000
1,840
$96,000
48,900
$2,543,000
710
$37,000
98,.500
$5,122,000
1,050
$55,000
20,200
$1,050,000
5,025
$261,000
74,700
$3,885,000
41,050
$2,135,000
53,800
$2,798,000
31,850
$1,656,000
25,850
$1,344,000
24,950
$1,297,000
19,450
$1,011,000
375,500
$19,527,000
3,108,400
$161,642,000
51,800
$2,694,000
33,500
$1,742,000
23,400
$1,217,000
32,000
$1,664,000
56,200
$2,922,000
58,600
$3,047,000
86,100
$4,477,000
17,150
$892,000
14,550
$757,000
39,550
$2,057,000
125,100
$6,505,000
56,400
$2,933,000
104,900
$5,455,000
44,350
$2,306,000
61,700
$3,208,000
2,070
$108,000
7,675
$399,000
45,200
$2,350,000
26,700
$1,388,000
18,850
$980,000
31,600
$1,643,000
13,600
$707,000
14,900
$775,000
93,100
$4,841,000
10,800
$562,000
7,350
$382,000
COUNTY(2)
LOS ANGELES
MADERA
MARIN
MARIPOSA
MENDOCINO
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN 1984(1) -CONTINUED
CITY/UNINCORPORATED POPULATION(4) PRIVATE AC_TI_VIT_Y BOND
ALLOCATION(5)-- -
(CONTINUED)
SOUTH EL MONTE
SOUTH GATE
SOUTH PASADENA
TEMPLE CITY
TORRANCE
VERNON
WALNUT
WEST COVINA
WESTLAKE VILLAGE
WHITTIER
UNINCORPORATED
CHOWCHILLA
MADERA
UNINCORPORATED
BELVEDERE
CORTE MADERA
FAIRFAX
LARKSPUR
MILL VALLEY
NOVATO
ROSS
SAN ANSELMO
SAN RAFAEL
SAUSALITO
TIBURON
UNINCORPORATED
UNINCORPORATED
FORT BRAGG
POINT ARENA
UKIAH
WILLITS
UNINCORPORATED
-19-
18,150
74,200
23, 550
30,600
134,700
85
15,200
88,600
6, 325
70,100
1,017,900
72,400
5,700
24,950
41,750
224,900
2,360
8,325
7,375
11,450
12,750
44,600
2,740
11,950
44,550
7,575
6,700
64,500
12,600
12,600
71,000
5,550
450
12,750
4,250
47,950
i
$944, 000
$3,859,000
$1,225,000
$1,591,000
$7,005,000
$4,000
$790,000
$4,607,000
$329,000
$3,645,000
$52,932,000
$1,614,000
$296,000
$1,297,000
$2,171,000
$5,012,000
$123,000
$433,000
$384,000
$595,000
$663,000
$2,319,000
$142,000
$621,000
$2,317,000
$394,000
$348,000
$3,354,000
$281,000
$655,000
$1,582,000
$289,000
$23,000
$663,000
$221,000
$2,493,000
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN 1984(1) -CONTINUED
COUNTY(2) CITY/UNINCORPORATED POPULATION(4) PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND
------ -------AREA(3�---- ------ - --- ALLOCATIONi b )
MERCED
149,900
$3,341,000
ATWATER
19,000
$988,000
DOS PALOS
3,530
$184,000
GUSTINE
3,410
$177,000
LIVINGSTON
5,800
$302,000
LOS BANOS
11,550
$601,000
MERCED
43,450
$2,259,000
UNINCORPORATED
63,200
$3,286,000
MODOC
9,600
$214,000
ALTURAS
3,330
$173,000
UNINCORPORATED
6,275
$326,000
MONO
9,325
$208,000
UNINCORPORATED
9,325
$485,000
MONTEREY
316,200
$7,047,000
CARMEL-BY-THE SEA
4,790
$249,000
DEL REY OAKS
1,560
$81,000
GONZALES
3,280
$171,000
GREENFIELD
4,710
$245,000
ICING CITY
5,975
$311,000
MARINA
27,400
$1,425,000
MONTEREY
29,100
$1,513,000
PACIFIC GROVE
16,100
$837,000
SALINAS
87,200
$4,535,000
SAND CITY
190
$10,000
SEASIDE
36,750
$1,911,000
SOLEDAD
6,225
$324,000
UNINCORPORATED
93,000
$4,836,000
NAPA
101,700
$2,267,000
CALISTOGA
4,050
$211,000
NAPA
53,300
$2,772,000
ST. HELENA
5,100
$265,000
YOUNTVILLE
3,050
$159,000
UNINCORPORATED
36,250
$1,885,000
NEVADA
63,700
$1,420,000
GRASS VALLEY
8,100
$421,000
NEVADA CITY
2,540
$132,000
UNINCORPORATED
53,000
$2,756,000
` -20- `
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN 1984(1) -CONTINUED
COUNTY(2) CITY/UNINCORPORATED POPULATION(4 ) PRIVATE AC_T_I_V_I_TY BOND
------- --- - ----AREA(3)
ORANGE
2,066,500
$46,055,000
ANAHEIM
233,000
$12,116,000
BREA
31,700
$1,648,000
BUENA PARK
65,000
$3,380,000
COSTA MESA
86,100
$4,477,000
CYPRESS
42,350
$2,202,000
FOUNTAIN VALLEY
54,900
$2,855,000
FULLERTON
106,900
$5,559,000
GARDEN GROVE
128,900
$6,703,000
HUNTINGTON BEACH
180,000
$9,360,000
IRVINE
76,000
$3,952,000
LAGUNA BEACH
18,450
$959,000
LA HABRA
47,450
$2,467,000
LA PALMA
15,850
$824,000
LOS ALAMITOS
11,550
$601,000
NEWPORT BEACH
66,000
$3,432,000
ORANGE
97,200
$5,055,000
PLACENTIA
37,300
$1,940,000
SAN CLEMENTE
29,450
$1,531,000
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
21,400
$1,113,000
SANTA ANA
223,000
$11,596,000
SEAL BEACH
26,400
$1,373,000
STANTON
26,200
$1,362,000
TUSTIN
40,250
$2,093,000
VILLA PARK
7,125
$371,000
WESTMINSTER
72,500
$3,770,000
YORBA LINDA
33,700
$1,.752,000
UNINCORPORATED
287,900
$14,971,000
PLACER
130,600
$2,911,000
AUBURN
8,100
$421,000
COLFAX
1,000
$52,000
LINCOLN
4,880
$254,000
ROCKLIN
8,500
$442,000
ROSEVILLE
27,550
$1,433,000
UNINCORPORATED
80,500
$4,186,000
PLUMAS
18,350
$409,000
PORTOLA
1,950
$101,000
UNINCORPORATED
16,400
$853,000
-21-
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN 1984(1) -CONTINUED
COUNTY(2)
CITY/UNINCORPORATED
-`
POpULATION(4)
-----------
PRIVATE ACT_IV_ITY BOND
---- ALI,OCATION(-5T
------
AREA�3js---
RIVERSIDE
757,500
$16,882,000
BANNING
15,750
$819,000
BEAUMONT
7,575
$394,000
BLYTHE
7,525
$391,000
CATHEDRAL CITY
14,800
$770,000
COACHELLA
12,000
$624,000
CORONA
41,650
$2,166,000
DESERT HOT SPRINGS
7,575
$394,000
LAKE ELSINORE
8,475
$441,000
LA.QUINTA
6,100
$317,000
HEMET
26,350
$1,370,000
INDIAN WELLS
1,880
$98,000
INDIO
26,600
$1,383,000
NORCO
21,850
$1,136,000
PALM DESERT
14,550
$757,000
PALM SPRINGS
37,700
$1,960,000
PERRIS
8,300
$432,000
RANCHO MIRAGE
7,275
$378,000
RIVERSIDE
179,700
$9,345,000
SAN JACINTO
8,900
$463,000
UNINCORPORATED
302,900
$15,751,000
SACRAMENTO
858,500
$19,133,000
FOLSOM
14,500
$754,000
GALT
6,150
$320,000
ISLETON
930
$48,000
SACRAMENTO
303,400
$15,777,000
UNINCORPORATED
533,500
$27,743,000
SAN BENITO
28,500
$635,000
HOLLISTER
14,100
$733,000
SAN JUAN BAUTISTA
1,350
$70,000
UNINCORPORATED
13,050
$679,000
SAN BERNARDINO
1,014,500
$22,610,000
ADELANTO
3,230
$168,000
BARSTOW
19,200
$998,000
BIG BEAR LAKE
5,850
$304,000
CHINO
45,850
$2,384,000
COLTON
23,350
$1,214,000
FONTANA
45,500
$2,366,000
GRAND TERRACE
9,650
$502,000
LOMA LINDA
11,200
$582,000
MONTCLAIR
24,700
$1,284,000
NEEDLES
4,500
$234,000
-22-
•
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN 1984(1)-CONTINUED
C0UNTY(2) CITY/UNINCORPORATED P0PULATI0N(4) PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND
- -- - -- ----AEA
RC3 ) -- - -- - -_-_ -- -- - ALL0_CATI0Nc5 )
SAN BERNARDINO (CONTINUED)
ONTARIO
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDLANDS
RIALTO
SAN BERNARDINO
UPLAND
VICTORVILLE
UNINCORPORATED
SAN DIEGO
SAN FRANCISCO
SAN JOAQUIN
CARLSBAD
CHULA VISTA
CORONADO
DEL MAR
EL CAJON
ESCONDIDO
IMPERIAL BEACH
LA MESA
LEMON GROVE
NATIONAL CITY
OCEANSIDE
POWAY
SAN DIEGO
SAN MARCOS
SANTEE
VISTA
UNINCORPORATED
SAN FRANCISCO
ESCALON
LODI
MANTECA
RIPON
STOCKTON
TRACY
UNINCORPORATED
-23-
104,200
$5,419,000
61,600
$3,203,000
48,950
$2,545,000
44,100
$2,293,000
131,000
$6,812,000
52,000
$2,704,000
18,800
$978,000
360,800
$18,762,000
2,040,900
$45,484,000
40,500
$2,106,000
89,400
$4,649,000
19,750
$1,027,000
5,150
$268,000
80,000
$4,160,000
74,300
$3,864,000
23,900
$1,243,000
52,400
$2,725,000
21,800
$1,134,000
54,700
$2,844,000
87,100
$4,529,000
35,450
$1,843,000
953,900
$49,604,000
19,000
$988,000
46,000
$2,392,000
41,950
$2,181,000
395,700
$20,577,000
706,900 $15,754,000
706,900 $36,760,000
390,600
$8,705,000
3,430
$178,000
39,500
$2,054,000
29,100
$1,513,000
4,390
$228,000
169,100
$8,793,000
21,650
$1,126,000
123,400
$6,417,000
i
COUNTY(2)
3
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN 1984(1) -CONTINUED
CITY/UNINCORPORATED POPULATION(4) PRIVATE ACT_IV_ITY BOND
AREAA ( 3- - -- ---- -- -- ALLOCATION(5)
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN MATEO
SANTA CLARA
ARROYO GRANDE
ATASCADERO
EL PASO DE ROBLES
GROVER CITY
MORRO BAY
PISMO BEACH
SAN LUIS OBISPO
UNINCORPORATED
ATHERTON
BELMONT
BRISBANE
BURLINGAME
COLMA
DALY CITY
FOSTER CITY
HALF MOON BAY
HILLSBOROUGH
MENLO PARK
MILLBRAE
PACIFICA
PORTOLA VALLEY
REDWOOD CITY
SAN BRUNO
SAN CARLOS
SAN MATEO
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
WOODSIDE
UNINCORPORATED
CARPINTERIA
GUADALUPE
LOMPOC
SANTA BARBARA
SANTA MARIA
UNINCORPORATED
CAMPBELL
CUPERTINO
G I LROY
-24-
175,700
$3,916,000
12,700
$660,000
18,200
$946,000
11,650
$606,000
9,675
$503,000
9,600
$499,000
5,775
$300,000
36,400
$1,893,000
71,700
$3,729,000
603,600
$13,452,000
7,875
$410,000
24,600
$1,279,000
3,030
$158,000
26,750
$1,391,000
720
$37,000
80,400
$4,181,000
24,500
$1,274,000
7,525
$391,000
10,850
$564,000
26,700
$1,388,000
20,400
$1,061,000
36,950
$1,921,000
4,150
$216,000
56,800
$2,954,000
34,900
$1,815,000
25,800
$1,342,000
80,900
$4,207,000
51,400
$2,673,000
5,400
$281,000
74,000
$3,848,000
320,400
$7,141,000
11,250
$585,000
4,350
$226,000
28,700
$1,492,000
77,200
$4,015,000
46,700
$2,428,000
152,100
$7,909,000
1,365,100
$30,423,000
33,650
$1,750,000
38,100
$1,981,000
25,550
$1,329,000
i
r
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PKIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN 1984(1) -CONTINUED
COUNTY(2) CITY/UNINCORPORATED POPULATION(4) PRIVATE_ ACTIVITY BOND
- -
AREA( -3Y--- - ---� - ALLOCATION(5)
SANTA CLARA
(CONTINUED)
LOS ALTOS
27,750
$1,443,000
LOS ALTOS HILLS
7,700
$400,000
LOS GATOS
27,800
$1,446,000
MILPITAS
41,350
$2,150,000
MONTE SERENO
3,450
$179,000 --
MORGAN HILL
19,050
$991,000
MOUNTAIN VIEW
61,800
$3,214,000
PALO ALTO
56,400
$2,933,000
SAN JOSE
683,800
$35,559,000
SANTA CLARA
89,600
$4,659,000
SARATOGA
30,050
$1,563,000
SUNNYVALE
111,900
$5,819,000
UNINCORPORATED
107,300
$5,580,000
SANTA CRUZ
203,100
$4,526,000
CAPITOLA
9,500
$494,000
SANTA CRUZ
43,700
$2,272,000
SCOTTS VALLEY
7,325
$381,000
WATSONVILLE
25,150
$1,308,000
UNINCORPORATED
117,500
$6,110,000
SHASTA
124,700
$2,779,000
ANDERSON
7,325
$381,000
REDDING
46,850
$2,436,000
UNINCORPORATED
70,500
$3,666,000
SIERRA
3,320
$74,000
LOYALTON
1,110
$58,000
UNINCORPORATED
2,200
$114,000
SISKIYOU
41,600
$927,000
DORRIS
820
$43,000
DUNSMUIR
2,100
$109,000
ETNA
770
$40,000
FORT JONES
530
$28,000
MONTAGUE
1,350
$70,000
MOUNT SHASTA
2,820
$147,000
TULELAKE
840
$44,000
WEED
2,910
$151,000
YREKA
6,500
$338,000
UNINCORPORATED
22,950
$1,193,000
-25-
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN .1984(1)-CONTINUED
COUNTY(2) _CITY/UNINCORPORATED PO_PULAT_I_ON(4) PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND
_-AREA 3 ALLOCATION(5)---
SOLANO
263,000
$5,861,000
BENICIA
19,100
$993,000
DIXON
9,100
$473,000
FAIRFIELD
64,400
$3,349,000
RIO VISTA
3,310
$172,000
SUISUN CITY
13,500
$702,000
VACAVILLE
48,300
$2,512,000
VALLEJO
87,900
$4,571,000
UNINCORPORATED
17,350
$902,000
SONOMA
323,100
$7,201,000
CLOVERDALE
4,240
$220,000
COTATI
4,010
$209,000
HEALDSBURG
7,700
$400,000
PETALUMA
36,450
$1,895,000
ROHNERT PARK
27,050
$1,407,000
SANTA ROSA
91,700
$4,769,000
SEBASTOPOL
5,975
$311,000
SONOMA
6,850
$356,000
UNINCORPORATED
139,200
$7,239,000
STANISLAUS
292,300
$6,514,000
CERES
16,300
$848,000
HUGIiSON
2,970
$154,000
MODESTO
122,900
$6,391,000
NEWMAN
3,390
$176,000
OAKDALE
9,175
$477,000
PATTERSON
4,640
$241,000
RIVERBANK
6,175
$321,000
TURLOCK
31,750
$1,651,000
WATERFORD
2,930
$152,000
UNINCORPORATED
92,100
$4,789,000
SUTTER
56,600
$1,261,000
LIVE OAK
3,690
$192,000
YUBA CITY
20,500
$1,066,000
UNINCORPORATED
32,400
$1,685,000
TEHAMA
42,700
$952,000
CORNING
5,150
$268,000
RED BLUFF
10,800
$562,000
TEHAMA
380
$20,000
UNINCORPORATED
26,400
$1,373,000
TRINITY
13,100
$292,000
UNINCORPORATED
13,100
$681,000
r -26- U.
PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS IN 1984(1) -CONTINUED
COUNTY(2) CITY/UNINCORPORATED POPULATION(4) PRIVATE ACT_I_VITY BOND
_._ KREA�3Y------------ - ALLOCATION -id---
TULARE
269,300
$6,002,000
DINUBA
10,600
$551,000
EXETER
6,075
$316,000
FARMERSVILLE
6,000
$312,000
LINDSAY
7,500
$390,000
PORTERVILLE
23,250
$1,209,000
TULARE
25,400
$1,321,000
VISALIA
57,000
$2,964,000
WOODLAKE
4,710
$245,000
UNINCORPORATED
128,800
$6,698,000
TUOLUMNE
37,750
$841,000
SONORA
3,970
$206,000
UNINCORPORATED
33,800
$1,758,000
VENTURA
579,900
$12,924,000
CAMARILLO
42,450
$2,207,000
FILLMORE
10,300
$536,000
OJAI
7,425
$386,000
OXNARD
121,100
$6,297,000
PORT HUENEME
19,850
$1,032,000
SAN BUENAVENTURA
83,900
$4,363,000
SANTA PAULA
22,250
$1,157,000
SIMI VALLEY
84,500
$4,394,000
THOUSAND OAKS.
93,800
$4,878,000
UNINCORPORATED
94,500
$4,914,000
YOLO
119,600
$2,665,000
DAVIS
38,750
$2,015,000
WINTERS
3,080
$160,000
WOODLAND
32,600
$1,695,000
UNINCORPORATED
451150
$2,348,000
YUBA
52,200
$1,163,000
MARYSVILLE
10,450
$543,000
WHEATLAND
1,620
$84,000
UNINCORPORATED
40,150
$2,088,000
(1) The allocation figures in this table were computed under
the provisions of
the Governor's proclamation
dated July
19, 1984 concerning private activity bonds.
Sample calculations are described beginning on
page 10 of
this special edition.
(2) Under the Governor's proclamation, counties receive 15 percent of the State volume cap for the
population of the counties.
(3) Under the Governor's proclamation, 35 percent of the State volume cap i.s allocated to cities (for the
population within their boundaries), and to counties ,(for the population in the unincorporated areae of
counties), and to the only city and county (San Francisco) in the State.
(4) These population figures are used to allocate the State Ceiling as described in the Governor's
proclamation. The population figures are the January 1, 1984 estimates published by the State Department
of Finance on May 1, 1984.
(5) These figures represent the amount of private activity bonds which may be issued by a county, city, or
city and county in 1984, notwithstanding any changes in allocations resulting from transfers or carry-
forwards.
-27-
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
a.". STATE
NO
*..,
im
xxx�
IN
A PROCLAMATION
by the Governor of the State of California
r
By virtue of the authority vested in the Office of the Governor by the federal Tax
Reform
Act of 1984, 1, George Deukmejian, as Governor of the State of California, hereby
proclaim as follows:
1. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Section shall for
all purposes of this proclamation have the following meanings:
(a) "Committee"
R-1
means the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee estab-
lished pursuant to Section 4 of this proclamation.
r
AN
(b) "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, including as it
�
will be amended by the federal Tax Reform Act of 1984.
b
(c) "County Population Share" means for each calendar year for each county or
city and county a percentage calculated by taking as the numerator the most
recent State Population Estimate of the entire population of such county or
b
city and county and by taking as the denominator the most recent State
Population Estimate of the state.
20
(d) "issuer" means any local agency or state agency authorized by the Constitu-
`Im
"�
MH
tion or laws of the state to issue Private Activity Bonds.
(e) "Local Agency" means any political subdivision of the state within the
meaning of Section 103(a)(1) of the Code, or any entity that has the power to
RM
issue Private Activity Bonds "on behalf of" any such political subdivision.
IN
FM
(f) "Local Population Share" means, for each calendar year (i) for each city or
tw
city and county, a percentage calculated by taking as the numerator the most
.RM
recent State Population Estimate of the population of such city or city and
by
R
county, and taking as the denominator the most recent State Population
Estimate of the population of the state; and (ii) for each county, a percentage
calculated by taking as the numerator the most recent State Population
Estimate of the population of the unincorporated area of the county, and by
Sms
[
taking as the denominator the most recent State Population Estimate of the
population of the state.
MN
(g) "Private Activity Bond" has the same meaning as that specified in Section
ra
103(n)(7) of the Code.
(h) "Private Activity Bond Limit" means any part of the State Ceiling allocated
or transferred
to a state agency or local agency pursuant to this proclama-
tion.
(i) "State" means the State of California.
�{[�Y��]YRN{IRIEW 1110 W2 RMSM IN YbVY
-29-
PAGE 2
(j) "State Agency" means the State and all state entities, including joint powers
authorities of which the State or agency or instrumentality thereof is a
member, empowered to issue Private Activity Bonds, the interest on which is
K
RN
'2M
exempt from income tax under Section 103(a) of the Code, including nonprofit
corporations described in Section 103(e) of the Code authorized to issue
student loan bonds.
ME
IM
(k) "State Bond Limit" means the 50% of the State Ceiling initially allocated to
the State pursuant to Section 3(a) of this proclamation, together with any
amounts transferred to any state agency pursuant to Section 6.
" !d
(1) "State Ceiling" shall be the amount specified by Section 103(n)(4) of the Code
for each calendar year commencing in 1984.
(m) "State Population Estimate" means with respect to calendar year 1984, the
estimate of population of California cities and counties published by the
State Department of Finance on May I, 1984 and, with respect to calendar
year 1985 and thereafter, means the most recent estimate of population of
R
C
California cities and counties published by the State Department of Finance
before the beginning of the calendar year.
MR
2. Pursuant to Section 103(n)(6)(8) of the Code, this proclamation shall govern the
allocation of the State Ceiling among the governmental units in this state having
authority to issue Private Activity Bonds. Any allocation granted or transferred by
or under the authority of this proclamation shall become the Private Activity Bond
Limit for the Issuer to which such allocation is granted or transferred for any
Private Activity Bonds issued by such issuer.
RM
aq
bm 19Wnevertheless
3. (a) There Is hereby allocated to the state agencies In each calendar year an
amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the State Ceiling.
(b) There is hereby allocated to each city, county, and city and county in each
calendar year an amount equal to thirty-five percent (3596) of the State
Ceiling multiplied by the Local Population Share of each such city, county, or
city and county,
(c) There is hereby allocated to each county (including any city and county)in
each calendar year an amount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the State
Ceiling multiplied by the County Population Share of each such county.
(d) The allocations made by subsections (a), (b) and (c) of this Section shall
be subject to the provisions of Section 9 hereof.
:R`y
r�
K
E
111
4. (a) The Committee is hereby established, consisting of the State Treasurer, the
State Controller and the Governor, or in the Governor's absence the Director
of Finance, any of whom may act through a designee. The State Treasurer
shall be the Chairman of the Committee' and the Office of the State
Treasurer shall provide such administrative assistance and support staff as
shall be necessary for the Committee to operate. Members of the Commit-
tee shall serve without compensation. The Chairman shall keep or cause to
be kept minutes and other records and documents of the Committee.
M RM
R
RM
(b) Two members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum. The affirmative
vote of two members of the Committee shall be necessary for any action
taken by the Committee; provided, however, that the Committee may by
unanimous vote delegate to its Chairman the authority to carry out any acts
empowered to It under this proclamation.
-29-
-30-
PAGE 3
(c) The Committee shall as soon as is practicable after the date of this
IN
proclamation, and thereafter at the start of each calendar year, determine
and announce the State Ceiling for the calendar year.
5. (a) Each state agency shall apply to the Committee prior to imitig any Private
Activity Bonds, supplying such information as the Committee may require.
Such be for
application may a specific project, or it may be for a designated
dollar amount, to be utilized for projects at the discretion of the state
g�
agency. No Private Activity Bonds issued by any state agency shall be
deemed to receive the benefit of any portion of the State Bond Limit unless
X99
the Committee has allocated a portion of the State Bond Limit to the state
agency. Such allocation may be on such terms and conditions as the
Committee may determine.
(b) Any local agency may apply to the Committee for an allocation of a portion
of the State Bond Limit, supplying such information as the Committee may
require. Applications from local agencies may only be for specific projects
or programs. The Committee may transfer to a local agency a portion of the
State Bond Limit upon such terms and conditions as the Committee may
determine.
(c) Any allocation made or transferred pursuant to this section shall be irrevoc-
able upon issuance of bonds pursuant thereto at least to the extent of the
principal amount of such bonds so issued and any such allocation or transfer
`
shall permit the state agency or local agency receiving same and any
Wd
transferee thereof to treat all or any portion of such allocation or transfer as
a carryforward pursuant to Section 103(n)(10) of the Code unless the resolution
or other action making such allocation or transfer provides otherwise.
t
(d) No allocation made to a state agency or transferred to a local agency
to this Section may be transferred by the initial recipient thereof to
Ypursuant
P.W.r
RM
any other state agency or local agency without the consent of the Commit-
tee.
EM
ERSM
6. To further implement
Y
IN
the provisions hereof, any local agency may, by resolution,
transfer to any other local agency or to any state agency all or any portion of such
Nm
local agency's Private Activity Bond Limit, subject to the provisions of Section
"YK
5(c), if applicable, and Section S. Any such transfer may be general or limited and
subject to such terms and conditions as may be set forth in said resolution;
provided that any such transfer shall be irrevocable upon issuance of bonds
pursuant to such transfer at least to the extent of the principal amount of such
bonds so issued and that any such transfer shall permit the transferree to elect to
R`
treat all or any portion of such transfer as a carryforward pursuant to Section
103(n)(10) of the Code unless the resolution making such transfer provides other-
wise. Any resolution or action taken by any local agency prior to the date of this
proclamation purporting to transfer any portion of any Private Activity Bond Limit
to another local agency is hereby ratified as if fully authorized by this Section.
7. (a) No issue of Private Activity Bonds shall be deemed to have received the
s
benefit of any portion of an allocation made or transferred to the Issuer
pursuant to this proclamation unless the Issuer's bond resolution or other
similar action giving final authority for the issuance of bonds specifically
designates a portion of the Issuer's Private Activity Bond Limit co such bond
Issue. Any such designation shall be irrevocable upon the issuance of such
bonds to the extent of the principal amount hereof.
(b) Each state agency and local agency shall notify the Committee in writing
within IS days of the issuance of any Private Activity Bonds, and of any
action taken pursuant to Section 6 to transfer any portion of its Private
-30-
RM
PAGE 4 r
11 IN
Ra �y
Activity Bond Limit to another state agency or local agency, and of any
election to treat all or any portion of such state agency's or local agency's
Private Activity Bond Limit as a carryforward pursuant to Section 103(n)(10)
of the Code.
8. Each county, and city and county, acting through its board of supervisors, shall give
priority in application of the allocations granted by Section 3(c) to assist issuance s
MN of Private Activity Bonds by the county (to the extent the county has fully utilized
IMM its share of the allocation granted by Section 3(b)), by local agencies within the rte_
county, or by local agencies whose territory contains part or all of the territory of
` county. The county may transfer, pursuant to Section 6, part of the allocation VK -
the
granted by Section 3(c) to a state agency or to a local agency whose territory is FAM
entirely outside the county only upon making a determination that it does not 09H
PON reasonably expect to grant requests to use such amount of its Private Activity MIA
Bond Limit for any projects or programs described in the first sentence of this
Section.
Y Yu. d
9. (a) Any state agency or local agency which has issued any Private Activity Bonds
Ya s
t� on or after June 19, 1984 and prior to the date of this proclamation shall M19
submit to the Committee a written notification of such bond issuance, r
containing the name of the Issuer, the principal amount, the designation of,7,
the bonds and the date of issue. The notification shall also be accompanied RIM
by a statement of the bond counsel for the Issuer as to whether or not the
bond issue was required pursuant to Section 103(n) of the Code to utilize a
portion of the Private Activity Bond Limit of the Issuer. The allocation made
by Section 3 applicable directly or indirectly to the Issuer of such bonds shall �^ a
be reduced by the principal amount of such bonds which bond counsel states
were required pursuant to Section 103(n) of the Code to be within the Private
Activity Bond Limit of such Issuer. i
IRZ
(b) Bonds issued on or after June 19, 1984 and prior to the date of this Z
1.5 .9
proclamation shall not receive the benefit of any portion of the State Ceiling —
allocated by Section 3 unless the notification required by subsection (a) is
received by the Committee within 30 days of the date of this proclamation,
and is accompanied by a statement of bond counsel to the effect set forth in
the last sentence of Section 9(a).
10. The Committee may request local agencies and state agencies to provide the WA
Committee with information pertaining to the amount and purpose of anticipated
09,
future Private Activity Bond issues, or any other information which may be useful o'r'b
to the Committee in performing its duties and responsibilities hereunder.
E
11. 1 hereby certify under penalty of perjury that none of the allocations contained in R4
the proclamation was made in consideration of any bribe, gift, gratuity, or direct
or indirect contribution to any political campaign. ;o
Y RPM
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand
and caused the Great Seal of the State of
California to be affixed this 19th day of July
1984
Gover or of California
6
ATTESTSEM
R�
Secretary YfState
r /X- ` q l
by ✓ ✓cr'f;� lT.�v_ N-� t)L C GI�Lt , L, r�
ML -
Lim Q
-31-
--
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
September 6, 1984
City Council Meeting
of September 11, 1984
TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
October 9, 1984
Review of valet stack parking system on VPD lots
Pier Lease
Resolution re. Deferred Comp Plan for City of Hermosa Beach
Creation of Administrative policy as to how letter to City Council
from the public are handled.
Adoption of Sewer Maintenance Rates and Implementation of Sewer Billing
System.
Resolution of intention to create underground lighting district 84-1.
Downtown Study Work Program.
Extraordinary appropriation of $2,500 re. Xmas decorations
CDBG contract - selection of consultant to administer programs
Review of City Capital Improvement Program
October 23. 1984
Award of Bid - Liability Insurance Coverages
CUP - Liquor at the Community Center
Commissioners' Manual
November 13, 1984
Report re. City Treasurer reporting to Council on investments w/report
from City Attorney (City Treasurer may file a report recommending
what she sees as a vehicle for communication).
November 27, 1984
Report on computerization of City Treasurer trust funds, including
VPD implementation.
Report on computerization of investment accounts, time certificates
of deposit, savings accounts and special bank accounts.
December 11, 1984
Encroachment permit reviews - La Playita & Fat Face Fenner's Falloon
September 7, 1984
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the REGULAR MEETING of
CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH September 11, 1984
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO EXAMINE SECTIONS 405, 505, 555, 6069 AND 706 OF
THE ZONING CODE AS THEY PERTAIN TO LOT COVERAGE TO DETERMINE
WHETHER OR NOT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SECOND STORY BALCONIES IS
INCLUDED IN CALCULATIONS OF LOT COVERAGE.
Recommendation
To adopt the attached Resolution of Intention.
Background
At the regular meeting of August 14, 1984, the City Council expressed its desire to
have the Planning Commission examine this issue. The impetus for this direction is the
idea that a development that is already covering the maximum percentage allowable on
a lot would not be able to add on a second story balcony. The Council is directing the
Planning Comission to review lot coverage and return with a recommendation.
Kim Reardon -Crites
Planning Assistant
NOTED:
� b
Bill Grove Pamela Sapetto
Building Director Planning Director
C CUR:
Gre ory k M yer
Cit Manager
IF �ba
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
171
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 84-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE
.ANNING COMMISSION TO EXAMINE SECTIONS 404, 505, 555, 606, AND 706 OF
lE ZONING CODE AS THEY PERTAIN TO LOT COVERAGE TO DETERMINE
TETHER OR NOT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SECOND STORY BALCONIES IS
CLUDED IN CALCULATIONS OF LOT COVERAGE.
WHEREAS, clarification of whether or not the square footage of a second story
balcony is included in the calculation of lot coverage is needed; and
WHEREAS, Sections 404, 505, 555, 606, and 706 of the Zoning Code do not
specify the factors used in calculating residential lot coverage;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the Planning Commission be directed to research and assess Sections
404, 505, 555, 606, and 706 of the Zoning Code to determine whether or
not it was the intent to include square footage of second story balconies
in calculations of lot coverage.
Section 2. That the Planning Commission shall return their recommendation with
appropriate Zoning Code amendments (if applicable) within forty (40) days
to the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of September, 1984.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California.
TTEST: CITY CLERK
PPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY
i
xONOPLABLE AMYOR AND MIIvIBERS OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1954
THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH
REGULAR MEETING OF
SEPTEMBER 11, 1954
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTIONS 401 AND 501 OF THE ZONING CODE AS
IT PERTAINS TO SIDEYARD SETBACKS TO DESIGNATE A MAXIMUM REQUIRED
SIDEYARD SETBACK OF 5 FOR R-1 AND R-2 DEVELOPMENTS.
Recommendation
To adopt the attached Resolution of Intention.
Background
At its regularly scheduled meeting of August 28, 1984, the City
Council requested that a Resolution of Intention be created to
address the issue of maximum sideyard setbacks for R-1 and R-2
developments. Staff is returning with the Resolution for Council
adoption.
NOTED:
Bill Grove
Building Director
CONCUR
Grego y T. Meyer
City pager
Kim Reardon -Crites
Planning Assistant
Palela Sapetto
Planning Director
P
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
ALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENT TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTIONS 401
ND 501 OF THE ZONING CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO SIDEYARD SETBACKS TO
ELINATE A MAXIMUM REQUIRED SIDEYARD SETBACK OF 5' FOR R-1 AND R-2
EVELOPMENTS.
WHEREAS, Sections 401 and 501 of the Zoning Code do not set a maximum sideyard
setback for R-1 and R-2 developments; and
WHEREAS, the City's requirement of a sideyard width of 10% of the lot width (with a
inimum of 31) creates a hardship for developments where the lot is very wide or the
parcel has an unusual configuration; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes that setting a maximum sideyard setback of 5'
ill create a more equitable requirement;
NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the Planning Commission be directed to research and assess sections
401 and 501 of the Zoning Code and arrive at a maximum sideyard
setback requirement for R-1 and R-2 developments.
Section 2. That the Planning Commission shall return their recommendation with
appropriate Zoning Code Amendments (if applicable) within forty (40)
days to the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , 1984.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach,
California.
ATTEST: CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY
b.
September 7, 1984
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the REGULAR MEETING of
CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH September 11, 1984
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE ZONING CODE, SECTION
11621 OFF STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW & EXISTING
CONSTRUCTION,TO ALLOW ADDITIONS OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR LESS, WITHOUT
A VARIANCE.
Recommendation
To adopt the attached Resolution of Intention.
Background
At the regular meeting of August 28, 1984, the City Council expressed its desire to
have the Planning Commission examine the zoning code as it pertains to
non -conforming structures. It was recommended that the Commission consider
amending the zoning code so ,that it would allow additions of 100 sq. ft. or less to
non -conforming structures without the necessity of applying for a variance. The
attached Resolution of Intention gives the Planning Commission such a directive.
Kim Reardon -Crites
Planning Assistant
Pamela Sapetto 1
Planning Director
NOTED:
Bill Grove
Building Director
CO UR:
Gre ory . M er
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 84-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
AMENDING THE ZONING CODE, SECTION 1162, OFF-STREET PARKING
REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION 2 TO ALLOW ADDITIONS
OF 100 SQUARE FEETPO S, WITHOUT AVARIANCE.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it desirable to maintain and improve the
existing housing stock; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the provisions of the zoning
ordinance regulating additions to non -conforming structures are restrictive and
discourage remodeling and rehabilitation of those structures.
NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the Planning Commission be directed to hold a public hearing and
research and assess amending Section 1162 of the Zoning Code to allow
additions of one hundred (100) square feet, or less, without a variance.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of September, 1984.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
,100
NOI. Vl3OSS TNI1 -_-lDVLXVW H3'7Ig VSO;�dlH 3HT �g Q3T.\3S02dd0"d
503,�0'IdW7- 2i0d SNO I11CIN00 ON i?IiOA QNY SIDVA ` S2MOH IH T
HTN03 ONITTIS JNIQN'a"iS?i C: -ii"; 30 iVN'dOd V
HOVaa VSO;rZiIH d.0 k=
3HT QNbr
NOIIVI30SSV KVag VSWdr EH
ONIQN'f TS`dHaX 13O KnaX `dOyKa;q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE 1 - PREAMBLE
r
' SECTION 1 - Intent
SECTION 2 - Commencement & Termination of Agreement
ARTICLE 2 - COMPENSATION
SECTION
1
- Base Monthly Salary
SECTION
2
- Educational Allowance
SECTION
3
- Merit Pay
SECTION
4
- Compensation Analysis
SECTION
5
- Deferred Compensation
SECTION
6
- Additional Compensation
SECTION
7
- Assistant City Manager Premium Pay
ARTICLE 3 - WAGE SUPPLEMENTAL
SECTION
1
- Vacation
SECTION
2
- Administrative Time
SECTION
3
- Holidays
SECTION
4
- Sick Leave
SECTION
5
- Vehicle Allowance
SECTION
6
- Public Safety Allowance
SECTION
7
- Retirement
ARTICLE 4 - INSURANCE
SECTION 1 - Health, Dental, Vision & Disability/Salary Cont.
SECTION 2 - Life Insurance
ARTICLE 5 - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
SECTION 1 - Annual Physical Examination
SECTION 2 - Liability Insurance
SECTION 3 - Termination and Severance Pay
ARTICLE 6 - OTHER PROVISIONS
SECTION 1 - Organizational Development and Management Training
ARTICLE 7 - MANAGEMENT OPTIONAL BENEFIT PROGRAM
SECTION
1
- Purpose
SECTION
2
- Objectives
SECTION
3
- Amount of Benefit
SECTION
4
- Benefit Options
SECTION
5
- Deferred Compensation
SECTION
6
- Eligible Employees
ARTICLE 8 GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 1 - Probationary Period
SECTION 2 - Attorney Fees
SECTION 3 - Nondiscrimination, Equal Opportunity Affirmative
Action
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE
HERMOSA BEACH MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION
THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING is made and entered into
this 1st day of October, 1984, by and between the City of Hermosa
Beach (hereinafter referred to as the City) and the Hermosa Beach
Management Employees' Association.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Meyers Millias-Brown Act, as amended in 1968
(being Sections 5500, et seq. of the Government Code), directs and
permits the establishment of certain "recognized employee Organiz-
ations" for the purpose of meeting and conferring in good faith with
the City regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of
employment; and
WHEREAS, the City does by approval of this Memorandum of Under-
standing continue to recognize the Association, as representing the
classifications described herein which consists of Management Pers-
onnel.
NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
A. This Agreement supersedes all previous such agreements.
B. That a new Memorandum of Understanding is hereby enacted
to read in its entirety as follows:
ARTICLE I - PREAMBLE
SECTION 1. Intent
It is the intent and purpose of the parties that this Memorandum
bf Understanding shall set forth rules of pay, hours of work and other
forms and conditions of employment to be observed by the parties. Said
Agreement has been developed in the interest of promoting and improving
employee relations between the City of Hermosa Beach, California, and
the Association.
SECTION 2. COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
Members of this Association and the Associations' duly recog-
nized representatives have met and conferred in good faith with the
City and have entered into this Memorandum of Understanding for a
periof of 18 months commencing on October 1, 1984. The City or the
Association may call for renegotiation of this agreement with the
intent that said contract to conclude March 31, 1986.
ARTICLE 2 - COMPENSATION
SECTION 1. Base Monthly Salary.
The City agrees to hire and appropriately compensate capable
management personnel. They will be professional, adequately trained,
meet standards required for such positions, and the Council reaffirms
that a compensation will include such items as salary, contribution
for PERS, vehicle, Deferred Compensation, cafeteria -style options of
compensation, merit and retirement.
The base monthly salaries of the positions represented by the
Association are attached as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. Educational Allowance.
In the event that the employee enters upon a program of education
at an accredited university or college, which program has been pre-
viously approved in writing by the City Manager, the employee shall
be entitled to a vocational allowance in an amount equal to sixty-six
percent (66o) of the tuition actually paid by such employee, which
tuition was paid after written approval as aforesaid, and which sums
shall be paid by the City within thirty days after submission to the
City Treasurer of proof of payment of said tuition by the employee in
accordance with the terms of this paragraph. In addition, any excess
beyond 66% may be funded from Article 7.
SECTION 3. Merit Pay.
City and Association shall continue its plan for merit pay.
Said merit pay to range from 0 to 6 percent of base monthly salary,
payable for three months increments. Evaluation to be generally along
the lines described in Exhibit B of the Agreement.
-2-
SECTION 4. Compensation Analysis.
Systematically the City and Management Association will study
all management positions and complete a compensation analysis to
evaluate duties to fulfil stated goals and objectives as outlined
in the current Fiscal Budget.
SECTION 5. Deferred Compensation.
Each Association member, individually, may elect to not parti-
cipate in any, deferred compensation plan; the Association further
agrees that, subject to City Approval, other employees may participate
in the Deferred Compensation Plan established and adopted by the City
o' Hermosa Beach April 1, 1983.
SECTION 6. Additional Compensation.
Should responsibilities of job change significantly, the compen-
sation for new classification shall be negotiated by Management and
the Association to be commensurate with new responsibilities.
SECTION 7. Assistant City 'Manager Premium Pay
On a rotating basis, one employee covered by this Agreement may
be designated by City Manager as Assistant City Manager; said assign-
ment may. --be daily, weekly or monthly and shall be paid as a per diem
base pay premium of 10 to 20 percent, said amount to be mutually deter-
mined at time of appointment.
Assistant City Manager duties shall include but not be limited to
Acting in the absence of the City Manager, day to day responsibility
for the administration of various grants, the processing of City Council
agenda items, purchase order and charitable solicitation processings,
monthly review of departmental budgets, the handling of citizen com-
plaints and City Council requests for follow through, long term purchas-
ing policy and responsibility for coordinating General Revenue Sharing
and CDBH annual budgeting.
An individual so assigned shall report directly to the City Manager
and shall operate within specified written goals and objectives that.
are reviewed and evaluated at least quarterly.
ARTICLE 3 - WAGE SUPPLEMENTAL
SECTION 1. Vacation.
a) Upon employment, positions covered by this agreement shall
accrue vacation at the following rates:
1)
12
days per
year through four (4) years of service;
2)
15
days per
year, five (5) years through nine (9) years
of
service;
3)
20
days per
year, ten (10) years or more of service.
b) Further, members may be paid cash in lieu of unused vacation
in excess of two weeks vacation at any time after utilization
of ten (10) days paid vacation during each calendar year.
c) Vacation must be used within 24 months of accrual. If not
used, it will be automatically cashed in.
d) Members shall be reimbursed for 100% unused vacation days
accrued upon resignation, retirement or imposed termination
from their employment with the City.
e) Members must use ten (10) vacation days each calndar year.
SECTION 2. Administrative Time.
Members of the Association shall accumulate administrative time
off at the rate of straight time for required attendance that exceeds
forty (40) hours per week. Said administrative time off is not redeem-
able in cash and is only redeemable in time off from the regular work
schedule. Administrative time off must be taken within sixty (60) days
of accrual.
SECTION 3. Holidays.
a) For the purpose of this agreement, the following days shall
be considered holidays with pay:
Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day,
Thanksgiving Day and day after, Christmas Day, New Year's
Day.
b) When a holiday occurs on Saturday, the day immediately pre-
ceding will be observed as a holiday. If a holiday falls on any other
scheduled day off, the employee may, subject to City Manager approval,
take another day off.
c) A holiday shall be construed as eight (8) hours, or in the
case of fire, one shift.
-4-
-S-
�MAA'�O•panaDoe sXup xOTs posnun jo oOS .zoj pasanqulTa.z aq
`X T3 @qj gjTM juawXoldtua .zTGgj wo.zj UOTIEUTtu.za; pasodtuT ao uaula.ZTI@a
`UOTjPUfTsa.z uodn `ITEus Iuatuaa.'P 3Tlgl Xq pa.zanoO saaXoldwg (J:
-Xinp .zoj ssaUITJ auTtu.zaIap
off. aGuTulPxa IEOTpalu MTD aLj-j Xq UOTIVUTw-exa .zoj I.zoda.z ol
poaTnba.z aq XEtu aaXoldtua up `anEal )JaTs WOIJ uanjoa uodn (I
@AEGq )JOTS uioaj uanl@,d (a
@oXoldtua GT41 jo
anEal xoTS nuTISTxa 9141 WOaj pajOnpap aq IIELIs aulTJ LIOnS (V
•ua.zplTLlOpuuaf ao `sjuGaudpuE.z2 `. Ggjotudajs `.zGgluj
-dajs `uETpaunf ao plTLls `. @gjoaq `a@IsTs `.MEI-UT-.zaLljEJ
`aGgIE} `MEI-UT-I@gjOW `.zaLljout `asnods :SV pauTJap
aq IIELIs UOTIOaS sTgl jo asodand GT41 aoj XITwEj aIETPGWWI (S
asn algEMollE up ST XDUEU'GJ d (Z
•aAEaI xoTS aZTITjn XEui aaXoldtua Gqj 1XITWP3
a;ETpatuutT aq; jo .zaquiatu E _To ssauTTT snOT.zas 3:0 asEO uI (I
•anEaZ xoTS XTTWPJ (P
•.zafEupW XITD
aLlj Xq p@aTnba.z TquuosE@a ssauxOTs jo jooad i@TL .o XuE
LIsTuan3 IIELIS aGXoldtua @qj PUP ITAEpTJJE juuosaod E ao
UBTOTsXgd fUTPUG;IU LIE UlOIJ `aouasqu jo @snuo @Ljj fUTIUIS
`juatuajEjs uallT.zM E XCq paT3TI@A aq Ism IT `S.CEp fUT
-)JaoM 01LTjn0aSuo0 (T) G@aL[; UELIJ GIOW .zoo ST aOuGsgE uaLlhl (Z
•.za2EUUW XITD Gql XJTIOU IIELIs )GXOTdwo
aL[I `anEal xoTS uo juasgE alTLIM uoTjEsuadusoo GATaOa.z os (I
•ssauxOTs 30 UOIIBOTJ:TION (O
•UOTJOE XjuuTIdTOSTp aO3 spunoaf aq
ITELIS anEal )JOTS �o asnsiw • anEal xoTS XITuiE_ .z03 .zo aaXolduia @q; �o
X;TITquSTp aO SSGUA3TS 40 aSEO LIT Xluo porn aq IIELIS GAEGT )JOTS
•anEal )JOTS Jo asn (q
-ivaX goEa 3o OZ .zagtuaoGa uo pTEd aq of sTgj
aIE.z oOOT lE uT pausEo XTTuoT;EtuojnB aq IITM ssaOxa
Xuy • sanoLl OOs aq IITM IBn.zOOB uintuTxuw • a;ua OOT ;E
/,ITEnuuu ssaoxa Gqj UT LlsEo Xpw .zaquiaur `panioov sanoTq
9LI aaj. -V -gluoui .zad s.znoLl (9) xTs ju aq IIELIs IEniooV (l
•aAEaI )JOTS _To sTs2g (E
• anEa7 )JOIS *t NoilD3S
SECTION 7. Retirement
Survivor Continuance Benefit.
The City agrees to pay employees' retirement share of PERS•
ARTICLE 4 - INSURANCE
SECTION 1. The City will have full responsibility for all Health and
Welfare programs enacted and/or in force as of July 31, 1984. Current
Health, Dental, Long Term Disability, Life Insurance, Vision Program
or their equivalent to remain in force during the life of this Memorandum.
In addition, a Mental Health Program will be provided by the City at no
cost to the Association members. The City shall meet and consult should
there be a change in providers.
The City will pay for employees' Long Term Disability and Life
Insurance, employee and one dependent of Health Insurance, and full
family coverage of dental and vision care.
Any portion of the City's premium for the full coverage plan which
includes the employee and one dependent, plus family where applicable,
that is unused will be applied to Article 7 of this contract.
SECTION 2. Life Insurance.
City shall continue to provide $2,000 of term life insurance for
all employees covered by this agreement; effective July 1, 1982, City
shall provide an additional $50,000 of term life insurance for all
employees covered by this agreement.
ARTICLE 5 - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
SECTION 1. Annual Physical Examination.
All employees covered by this agreement shall be provided with a
complete physical medical examination at the doctor of the City's choice,
or have the option of utilizing Daniel Freeman Hospital Center for Heart
and Health Improvement at the City's expense. The annual examination is
to include at least the following:
1) Review of medical history.
2) Urinalysis
3) VDRL
4) X -Rays, CChest PA, Lumbar Spine and Cervical)
5) Blood groupings.
6) EKG
7) Limpid Analysis
-6-
SECTION 2. Liability Insurance.
Individuals covered by this agreement shall be provided with
comprehensive liability insurance or City Self Insurance in the
amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) to provide coverage in
the following areas:
General Liability
Errors and Omissions
Civil Rights Matters
O.S.H.A.
SECTION 3. Termination and Severance Pay.
In accordance with the previously signed Memorandum of Under-
standing, the employment of any members of the Association may be
terminated in accordance with Civil Service Rules, and upon the follow-
ing conditions:
a) That such employee be paid a severance pay in an amount based
upon the formulas set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incor-
porated herein by reference; provided, however, that the City shall
have no obligation to compensate said sever-ance pay in the event said
employee is terminated because of his conviction of any illegal act
which shall reflect adversely on City. And further provided that
severance pay is not applicable to a voluntary resignation.
b) That amounts due to paragraph a) above shall be paid monthly
on the first pay day of each month commencing with the first month
following the cessation of employment; and
c) That the foregoing sums and notices be in addition to any
other sums due and owing the employee (i.e., vacation pay, etc.), and
any other notices required to be given to such employee pursuant to
any other laws of the City or the State of California.
d) Mitigation of damages re re-employment.
The severance pay required to be paid the employee pursuant to
this paragraph shall cease if the employee is employed on a full-time
basis, and said employment shall be deemed to have commenced upon the
date that said employee actually commences full-time employment with
said other employer.
e) Termination of Employee.
The employee shall have a right to terminate employment with the
City at any time during the term of this agreement upon sixty days
written notice to the City Manager.
-7
f) Any new Department Heads appointed after August 1, 1983
are not eligible for benefits under this section.
ARTICLE 6 - OTHER PROVISIONS
SECTION 1. Organizational Development and Management Training.
$2,500.00 shall be budgeted each year for group training purposes.
A Committee of three, two chosen by the Association and a City repre-
sentative, shall select and schedule training programs for partici-
pation of employees covered by this agreement.
ARTICLE 7 - MANAGEMENT OPTIONAL, BENEFIT PROGRAM
SECTION 1. Purpose.
To provide a management benefit package which allows the manage-
ment employee to select benefits according to his or her individual
needs.
SECTION 2. Objectives.
a) To enhance the ability of the City to attract and retain
high caliber management employees.
b) To provide management employees a choice of benefits.
c) To provide recognition and incentive for effective and effi-
cient management of the City operations and to recognize that manage-
ment employees often work irregular and unscheduled overtime hours
without extra compensation.
SECTION 3. Amount of Benefit
The benefit shall equal one point nine percent (1.9%) of the
annual base salary computed on the basis of the management employee's
monthly salary, plus any unused portion forwarded from Article 4
Section 1.
SECTION 4. Benefit Options.
To include:
a) Educational allowances.
As outlined in Article 2, Section 2, cost incurred in excess
of 66%.
b) PERS.
The City will pay 1000 of each employee's cotribution to
PERS.
190
-6s
' quauiquiodda go auiz4
4p 4T;auaq szgq 101 aTgTbzTa aq TTpgs saaXo dura
T quaivabPupui pa4uzoddP
4TMatq sTq-4 zo; aTgTBTTa aq TTpgs saaXOTdua PuP'sza0T o
-abPUPui zO; uoz4nTosaa Xzp ;� quaui
Tis TPnuup aLIq UT PagSTT saaAoTduia TTV
•sa@XoTdua aTgTBTT3 •9 NoIsoss
•uoz�.oaTas
quazzno zzagq abuPgo 04 gszM Aaqq oPa �T zpa�
q JO T XTnf azo;aq ao quaui
-XOTduia buzOuaunuoo' uodn s4Tgauaq 40@Tas ,KPui saa-�oTduia quauiabpupW
SqT;auag go uOT43aTas •s NoiW3s
•aoupznsuz TPuOTgTPPp
go uiz09 aq4 UT 4Tgauaq zaq/sTq go 4aPd P zo TTp axpq APu
' zabpuPW ,igTo aqq go TPnozddp ggTM ' GGAOTduia Yuauiabpupui V
zo aoupznsul 04nV dnozo'•a•T•aaoupznsu s'zauMoaurog
I TPUOT4TPPV (a
*ape -'K aq4 buzznP SAPP ,Ked �Z aqq go gopa
zoo zo zaquiaOaQ uz 4uauAPd qspo autzq-auo P SP gzgauaq
zaq/szq go 4zpd aO TTP axP4 e�pui aa,�oTduia quaurabpupui V
• 4uauuPd gSeD ( P
•UOTgpzTUp5aO TPUOissaJozd P ,�q
paaa4STUTuipP upTd UOT42suaduioo PanozddP up �qTo aqq oq
gsoo ou 4P PapnTOUI •upTd awooul pazza a
� Q aqq 04ui
suoTgngTaquOO TPnba SP zpaX azTqua aqq nano pagngzz-.sTp
aq TTTM PagOaTas 4unouiP aqq 'uoTgdo stgq zapun •upTd
aarooul pazza3aQ s,X4TO aq4 OgUT uoTgngTzquoO sp 4zJauaq
zaq/sTq 90 4aPd zo TTP aniaOaz XPui aaXoTduia quauiabpupu V
•uoTgesuadiuoo pazza�aQ (O
-01-
XauloI IV XITO
b EOd 01 SV QHAO'dddd
anTjvjuasoada-d pazTaoglnb CIna
I
g
NOII'VI00SSb SH9.7,0'IdWH iNHWHOdNVNl HOVHg VSOKdaH
ao�CEjnj
�Cg
VINUJI'Ib'0 `HOdHg VSOKEgH 30
,KI IO HHI 30 q IONl100 ALIO
'uaI;TIM GAOgp JSIT� IEGX pup a;Ep aqj uo fuTpuE;Saapun Jo uinpuEaoiu@W
sTgj O;UT paaa;ua anpq soTjiud aq; `dOgIdgHr-1 SSHNZINI NI
luGIxa lsaTTn.� a141 o1 saTITITgp aTaqI
azilTin X ui saoXoTduta TTp apL[I os sailTunlaoddo SuTUTEIl ajETadoaddp pup
493-UVISTssp `juamafEinooua apzAoad of aaafp saaXoTduug juauiafuuuj� sjT pup
XITO GU 'suoTIEniTs lu@uIXOTduia UT XITnTIonpoad pup TETlualod IsagfTq
GT41 anatgOE pup xaas off. pup sGo Kolduia IIp ao} jdaouoo aq; fuTlaoddns
UT XIanTITsod pup XTanTIOE ajE.zad000 of aaafu saTlapd aqZ (q
'SuoTSTnoad asagj ;no fuTXIIEO JOT
XITTzgzsuodsal jdaoou XITuninw SaTIiEd glog 'saTITunlioddo ju@wXolduza
Tunba Jo uoTIPIuaOaTdwT pup juauidOTanap aqj UT aloe TETOnIO E anpq
saTIiEd gioq ;Eiji aalfE saa,oTduig luauza2pupW sIT pup XITO aqz (p
'uoTJOV aRTJEtUaTJ3V XiTuniaodd0 TEnbg `uoTjpuTuiTIOSTpuoN '2 NOI.LOHS
�uauiaal�E STIJI Jo SuOTSTAoad aql fuTOaoJua UT papuadxa saa3 s,,(auaojjc
oTquuospaa Xjaud fuTITUA@ad aqj ol pauMu sanEuzpp TpuoT;Tppp sp XEIu
jano0 aill IEgj aaafp SaTjapd oT41 `Juaulaaafp STL[I Jo SUOISTAoad ao
SuoTITpuoO pup Swag; aqj 30 /,UP 2uTuaaOu00 XJTO aq1 pup `Juaulaaafu
STL[; Xq paaanoO aaXoTduia up uaa)mjaq alndsip p jo ;uana aqj UI
saa3 Cauao;jv 'Z NOI.LOHS
juaivaaafp sigl Xq paaanoO sassETO aqJ 01 sJuanlJUToddu
TTp aol poTaad XIEuoTjvgoad aEaX (T) auo p aq TTEgs aaagZ
'potlad XapuoTjpgoad 'T NOIZOHS
SNOISIAO'dd gV'dHNHJ - 8 H'IOII'dV
This salary range is to be awarded by the City Manager after a
Performance Assessment is completed. Each Department Head within the
salary range shall be compensated a minimum of 20o base pay over the
next subordinate rank, comparing top step to top step.
It is agreed that each employee, upon implementation of this
Memorandum of Understanding, shall be placed in the pay step that is
at least 10% greater than his present pay. Further, his/her pay will be
raised 10% July 1, 1985.
EXHIBIT A
BASE SALARY RANGE
STEP
STEP
STEP
STEP
STEP
STEP
STEP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BUILDING u SAFETY
2772
2911
3057
3210
3371
3540
3717
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
2769
2907
3052
3205
3365
3533
3710
FIRE
3402
3572
3751
3939
4136
4343
4560
GENERAL SERVICES
2808
2948
3095
3250
3413
3584
3763
PLANNING
2825
C296
3114
3270
3434
3606
3786
POLICE
3654
3837
4029
4230
4441
4663
4896
PUBLIC WORKS
3218
3379
3548
3725
3911
4107
4312
This salary range is to be awarded by the City Manager after a
Performance Assessment is completed. Each Department Head within the
salary range shall be compensated a minimum of 20o base pay over the
next subordinate rank, comparing top step to top step.
It is agreed that each employee, upon implementation of this
Memorandum of Understanding, shall be placed in the pay step that is
at least 10% greater than his present pay. Further, his/her pay will be
raised 10% July 1, 1985.
6. LEr.DERSHIP
COMENTS:
7. INTERPERSONAL SENSITIVITY
CO' -L' -TENTS :
8. FLEA;IBILITY AND INTNOVATION
CO�uSr NTS :
9. IL4NDLI."G STRESS
COI �;ENT S
10. TECHNICAL hNOVLEDGE
CO �ENTS :
7
,S..y,rrifor ��
,S„p,rrif o/
Erro/olr, i
Er-,D/Cr r
S.p r r r,I or
each performance dimension. Consider each dimension
separately and do not allow -you,
razing on one dimension to influence your judgment on
others. Provide specific -
examples of critical incidents of performance to explain
and support your rating.
EXHIBIT B
t Q, C N cry 4
I.
CON:UNICATION
elIt ? d,
S.F,fnfO/
2.
AFILITY TO ANALYZE AND SOLVE PROBLEMS
CO NTS :
�.p,rnsor
3.
DECISION MA—KING
CO': ENTS :
.S.yrrn'ior
�^S
4.
PL.I',NING t -M ORGANIZATION
CO2�YIENTS :
Ec-0/or..
5.
F,.ANAGDMENT CONTROL
CONSENTS:Ery/oy„
��i T ��—��—•+
6. LEr.DERSHIP
COMENTS:
7. INTERPERSONAL SENSITIVITY
CO' -L' -TENTS :
8. FLEA;IBILITY AND INTNOVATION
CO�uSr NTS :
9. IL4NDLI."G STRESS
COI �;ENT S
10. TECHNICAL hNOVLEDGE
CO �ENTS :
7
,S..y,rrifor ��
,S„p,rrif o/
Erro/olr, i
Er-,D/Cr r
S.p r r r,I or
•potsad lesiesdde szgl 2uTanp
sa2uego Saessaoau Sue 2oa;;a of uaxel sdais 1,3zivapl •jonpoad AaoAn lleaano put? spaau
Zeluamdolanap saijTjTgedeo anblun °sassauxeam isgg2uaais 'szuamanaigoe 2uipuejsjno.ss
�uzgj tions 2uipnlout 'aouentuo;lad s �aaSoldma aql uo luaa=00 -- 3AIZFRiUVR S,Uat) lKVW .UID 'III
iosuisdns
va.fQ�cku3
JOSmJadnS
oaA'OJd U7
Josrw��dr�`
aa.to�aFL3
�osu�adn5
aa.lo/aFL3
Josu.Jadns
s a.�O�dui3 ,
1 �
t ~ y>
� rti
= SZN3�IOJ
SZN3j voo
=SZNaM400
�SZN3hN1oo
'Z
S ZN3Izdoo
'I
•poivad lestesdde s-cq:i
2uTjnp io3 algeiun000e plaq seri aaKoldcna aq1 goigm matA�CaiuF lesTuadde snolAaad aqj nx
Xj:iuXoC uodn paploap saAZ-3oaCgo aqZ uo apem ssalsoad aqj ajenlena rtlluapuadaput ptie;
uo ouaamoa . zszl ptnogs j.aSeusR KITO aql � pue aaXoldula aqZ -- S3AIZ33M 3o 'ivsi -da r9l 'II
:31VQ :u39vNvN )U13 3HZ 30 aullZHK9IS 'IA
i
3ZdQ=33xogd�3 30 MgZYNOIS
•am 01 ajgsltene apem
S?m 2uamnoop palaldmoo aqj ;o Kdoo s pus anoge aoads aqi uz ZZ uo Zuammoo of X2Tuniioddo
ue peq aneq I •testeadds aouvoj ojjad szgZ ssnoszp of aa3euek fjjD aqa gjTm yam aAeq I
(l'lN0IZd0) Si"Ra N00 S , 33w'Io-zi 'A
•papnjout aq Sem saAtaoa Cqo tlgnoa2 pus juamdolanap Isuosaad
-pasnssam aq IITA gosa noq ZTal lalgzssod 3I •jsstasddv siaeaK :.xau io; II aozIoaS ut
pasn aq of saATjoaCgo aanin; istZ 'II pus I uozaaaS uZ suotzdaoaad ut saouaaa;;Zp aqi
:Lo 2uamm03 'noTssnosTp stgj SuunQ -- 2i30VN R UlD CKV 33A0'Idh3 'iO3 M3IA2I3LIII 'IvSIvuCICII 'Al
(panuiluoo) 3AIZ'dHEV.1i S, d:IOVNdid 3.1.10
(•aoloaiia saoanosad XIzunufu'oD
puE `aoloaaIG sxao1A ozTgnd `ao;oaazQ uozjEaaoa'd `ao;oaazQ XJGJES
puE SuzpTTng of aTgEoiTddE) XEd aouEaanas paIsan XpEaaTE aaITE
iou saop fuzpuE;saopun 3o wnpuElouiaN snoznaad aqj uz aTnpagos aq�
01 uozjE3z3zpoUI E sE `aTnpagos szgp iEq; `aanaMoq `papzAoad
XaETEs asEq s,gluow S
XIETEs asEq s,gquow t
XaETEs asEq s,gjuoui S
XaETps asEq s,gjuotu Z
XIETES asEq s,gluow auO
aaow ao sgluoUI 6b
sgIuoUI Sv-LS
sgquotu 9S -SZ
sgJuoW VZ-ZT
pozlad Xi-euoijEgold 30 pus
:pEaH juawjaEdaQ E SE aoinlas
TEjo; uo pasEq `sMoTToj: sE si aTnpagos XEd aouEaaAas aqs
XVd HDNVUaASS
D ZIgIHXS
NOIiVI00SSV lNaW99VNVW HOVag VS0MaH
lNSQISa2dd `NOSaag XNVld
ETuaO3TTED `goEag Esour. GH J:o KITD
NUDVNVK ALIO `daAaW • i AU00ax0
t86I `iogo;o0
3:0 XPP ISI STT41 2uTpuejsiapun 3o ujnpupaouION TPIuaulaTddnS
siT41 @jnoaxo off, sanTIcluasoadaa pazTaoT4jnp XTnp aTagl
pasn-eo aneq OIGIaq saTlaud aql dOa'dHHM SSaNIIM NI
New Regional Group Office
En an� New England Mutual Life In nce Company
522 Broadway East, Suite 200 J
Life Glendale, California 91205 �J
818 500-0020 �/ C
August 22, 1984
Mr. Dan Maniaci
916 Silver Spur Road, Suite !206
Rolling Hills Estates, California 90274
RE: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Dear Dan:
PETER R. MOORMAN
Sales Representative
Enclosed is New England Life's proposal on the City of Hermosa Beach group
Life, AD&D, Medical and Dental benefits. Briefly cited, here are the key
provisions of our plan:
�l. An outstanding contract:
- Liberalized mental and nervous benefits -
7 �c - 100% coverage for second surgical opinion, pre -admission testing,
out-2atient surgery and any accident expense treated on an out -
C ct patient bass R
L 2. Transfer credits for deductible and co-insurance satisfied during this
calendar year under the Blue Cross plan. This is a very important bene-
fit when you consider a 12/1/8/ effective date. Most carriers, as
you know allow transfer credits for deductible, but we are fairly unique
Ain also allowing transfer of co-insurance.
3. Maternity includes coverage for nursery care.
4. Two years survivor health benefit.
5. Prompt local claim service.
6. Substantial savings based on an estimated Blue Cross renewal increase of
33% effective 12/1/84.
Using the above as our best guess, New England Life's rate would be about 9%,
or $14,000 annual dollars, less than Blue Cross for medical and dental coverage.
Along with these savings, your client would also receive a stronger mental and
nervous benefit paid same as any other up to a maximum of 70 days in any twelve
month period in hospital, and 50% of $50 for one visit per week out of hospital.
The out-patient incentive features are a particularly effective way to reduce both
employer and employee medical costs, and a big plus point.
New England Life's quote for December 1 is qualified by our rate being no more
than 15% under Blue Cross' 12/1/84 renewal rate. I don't believe this will be
a problem with the type of increase we are expecting from Blue Cross, but I
wanted you to be aware that our quote is contingent on the size of the renewal
increase. As a ball park figure, I would estimate our rates will hold if Blue
Cross' increase does not exceed 45% over present billing.
Notations: Blue Cross New England Life Blue Shield
Survivor Benefit
*See brochure or plan certificate for other restrictions.
916 Silver Spur • Suite 206 • Palos Verdes Peninsula, California 90274 • (213) 541-4824
HEALTH INSURANCE
PLANS
BENEFITS
CURRENT PLAN
PLAN A
PLAN B
Deductible
$100
$100
$150
Physician
800/0
8011/
80?/ or 600%
Medication
800/1,
800%
80%
Hospital
80%
80%
80% or 50%
Accident Benefit
800%
1000/
$50 Ded.
Stop Loss
$5,000
$5,000
$2,500
Out of Pocket
$1,000
$1,000
$500
Mental, Nervous
500/ to $5,000
80'/ to 70 days
50% to 30 days
Out Patient
/0 al y� "���
1
50% of $50 visit*
50`i'� of $20 visit-
isi -Pregnancy
Pregnancy
800/
80'/
89%,
Nursery
yes
yes
IYres
Pre-existing
N/A
Takeover
','akeover
Future Enrollees
6/12 Mo.
3/12 Mo.
3/12 Mo.
Deductible Assump.
N/A
yes
yes
Maximum Benefit
$2 Million
Unlimited
$2 Million
Room & Board
Avg . Semi-Priv .
Avg . Semi-Priv .
Avg . Semi-Priv .
Surgical Schedule
Usual, Reasonable
Usual,Reasonabl.e
Usual,Reasonabl
Life Insurance
None
$10,000 Min.
None
Notations: Blue Cross New England Life Blue Shield
Survivor Benefit
*See brochure or plan certificate for other restrictions.
916 Silver Spur • Suite 206 • Palos Verdes Peninsula, California 90274 • (213) 541-4824
7Z97 -17S (EIZ) • 17LZ06 elu'OlIIeo 'e!nsu!uad sapJOA sOled . 90Z el!nS . indS J9n1!S 9l6
•IL MauGa uo anp sas-ea.zout aT� i pa�o�azd:�oagaz qou saop u� d quG ijn0
bT' 9S8 $ GS' 89Z $ j�l?aaiCgdwg
,� bt S9' SLZ $ 80' G8z $ da Q au 0 2 aa,Coldw H
G9' 6ET $ t7S' 8TT $ GG,C ldwH
9 N`d'-Id 5 NdId NVId ZNH2I2If10
H'InCHHOS HJ Vb l Wf1IWHHd
}y
A Proposal
and estimate of cost for
Group Insurance
Prepared for: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Submitted by: MANIACI INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.
I
jr
Date: DECEMBER 1, 1984
Ed
he
G P P-462-7 5
Major Medical Benefits
COVERED Covered medical expenses include the usual and
MEDICAL customary charges actually made to the covered
EXPENSES employee or covered dependent for the services,
treatments, and supplies listed below. These
items must be recommended by a physician and be
medically necessary according to generally
accepted medical standards for the care or
treatment of an accident or an injury.
° Hospital Charges:
° Charges made by a hospital for room and board,
including intensive care charges, up to the
daily rate shown in the Schedule of Benefits;
and
Charges made by a hospital for medical supplies
and services, including x-ray and laboratory
charges.
Anesthesia Charges for the services of a doctor
who gives anesthesia.
° Transvortation Charges:
Charges made for a professional ambulance
service to and from a local hospital or
sanitarium; and
° Charges made by a professional ambulance
service, railroad or scheduled airline for
round-trip transportation to the nearest
hospital qualified to give special treatment.
Such transportation must be within the U.S.,
Canada and Puerto Rico and is limited to
one round-trip in a calendar year.
° Surgery Charges for a surgical procedure performed
by a physician.
° Physicians' Charges made by a physician or a hospital
for medical care and treatment, other than for
surgery, anesthesia and surgery listed above.
GPP-747-84
COVERED Special (Private Duty) Nursing Charges made by
MEDICAL a registered or licensed nurse, or by a hospital,
EXPENSES for necessary nursing care as evidenced by a
(Continued) written statement of the attending physician,
provided the nurse does not normally reside in
the employee's home or is not related to the
employee.
° Charges for Medicallv Necessary Services and
Supplies, other than those included in "Hospital
Charges", including charges for:
° blood and blood derivatives, bandages and
dressings;
° x-ray and laboratory exams;
° x-ray, radium and radioactive isotope
treatment;
° oxygen and rental or related equipment;
° rental of certain medical supply equipment
including: wheelchairs, standard hospital
beds, mechanical respirators, and durable
equipment needed to treat a sickness or an
injury;
° a registered physician or occupational therapist:
prosthetic body supportive appliances needed
to aid impaired functions;
prescription drugs and medicines; and
° kidney dialysis.
° Kidney Transplant Charges incurred by the donor of
a kidney will be treated as charges incurred by a
covered employee or a covered dependent.
Private Duty Charges are exluded from the stop loss.
t
A41-
GPP-748-84
Major
Medical
Benefits
COVERED Special (Private Duty) Nursing Charges made by
MEDICAL a registered or licensed nurse, or by a hospital,
EXPENSES for necessary nursing care as evidenced by a
(Continued) written statement of the attending physician,
provided the nurse does not normally reside in
the employee's home or is not related to the
employee.
° Charges for Medicallv Necessary Services and
Supplies, other than those included in "Hospital
Charges", including charges for:
° blood and blood derivatives, bandages and
dressings;
° x-ray and laboratory exams;
° x-ray, radium and radioactive isotope
treatment;
° oxygen and rental or related equipment;
° rental of certain medical supply equipment
including: wheelchairs, standard hospital
beds, mechanical respirators, and durable
equipment needed to treat a sickness or an
injury;
° a registered physician or occupational therapist:
prosthetic body supportive appliances needed
to aid impaired functions;
prescription drugs and medicines; and
° kidney dialysis.
° Kidney Transplant Charges incurred by the donor of
a kidney will be treated as charges incurred by a
covered employee or a covered dependent.
Private Duty Charges are exluded from the stop loss.
t
A41-
GPP-748-84
0
Major Medical Benefits
COVERED
Pregnancy Charges incurred by a covered female
MEDICAL
employee or covered dependent spouse as a
EXPENSES
result of pregnancy, childbirth or related
(Continued)
medical conditions.
° Nursery Care Charges for routine nursery care
of a newborn infant. The nursery charges must
be incurred during the same period that the
mother is confined to the hospital.
° Home Health Care Charges made by a licensed
home health care agency. A doctor must certify
that the use of such services is to treat a
condition as an alternate to confinement in
a hospital or skilled nursing facility.
J
Major Medical Benefits
MENTAL AND Benefits for covered medical expenses incurred
FUNCTIONAL due to mental illness or functional nervous
NERVOUS disorders will be determined on the same basis
DISORDERS as benefits for covered medical expenses from
any other injury or illness with the following
limitations:
When hospital confined, expenses will be
reimbursed on the same basis as any other
claim up to a maximum of 70 days confine-
ment during any twelve month period.
i
° When not hospital confined, reimbursement of
' charges made by a physician, psychiatrist or
psychologist is limited to one per treatment
per week and $50 per treatment. The maximum
benefit payable is $25.
However, charges for shock therapy incurred
on an outpatient basis are payable on the same
basis as would be payable if the therapy was
received while hospital confined. Each day
on which shock therapy is administered will
count as one day of hospital confinement.
GPP-757-84
C
Major ®r Medical Expense Insurance
Medical expenses resulting from a pre-existing condition.
"Pre-existing condition" means an accidental bodily injury
which occured or a sickness which began before the date a
person's major medical coverage became effective and for
which medical expenses were incurred or treatment was
received in the three-month period immediately preceding
that date.
Benefits are payable for such conditions, however, on
"Covered Medical Expenses" incurred after the earlier
of the date the person completes (a) a period of 3 con-
secutive months ending after he is insured under this
coverage during which period he incurs no"medical
expenses and receives no treatment for the condition, or
(b) a period of 12 consecutive months during which he is
covered for this insurance, or (c) for an employee only,
a period of 6 months of continuous coverage and sub-
stantial continuous active employment for at least an
average of 30 hours per week.
A waiver of the pre-existing conditions limitation will
apply to expenses which that limitation would otherwise
exclude, if an individual was eligible for benefits
under another group plan issued to or through the
Policyholder on the day before this Plan became
effective, and ceased to be eligible for those benefits
solely because the plan was discontinued. Under the
waiver, benefits will be paid for any "Covered Medical
Expenses" for which the prior plan would have provided
benefits had that plan not been discontinued. The
amount payable will equal the benefit provided by the
prior plan or the benefit otherwise payable under this
Plan, whichever.is less.
GPP-745-84
Accidental Death and
Dismemberment Insurance
(24-HOUR)
BENEFITS This insurance provides a payment in the event of an in-
sured employee's accidental death or accidental loss of
limb or eyesight. Specific benefits are as follows:
The principal sum will be paid for the loss of
Life
Both hands or both feet
Sight of both eyes
One hand and one foot
One hand and sight of one eye
One foot and sight of one eye
One-half of the principal sum will be paid for the loss of
One hand or one foot
Sight of one eye
The Schedule of Insurance determines the amount of princi-
pal sum for which an employee is insured.
PROVISIONS In order for benefits to be paid loss must be suffered
within 90 days of the date of accident.
If more than one loss is sustained as a result of any one
accident, payment will be made for the loss for which the
largest amount of indemnity is payable.
GPP-421-74
Convalescent Care Benefits
CONVALESCENT Expenses incurred by a covered employee or covered
CARE dependent due to confinement in a skilled nursing
BENEFITS facility will be reimbursed in accordance with
the Schedule of Benefits provided:
° confinement in a skilled nursing facility
begins after a hospital confinement of at
least three consecutive days;
° confinement in a skilled nursing facility
begins within 14 days after discharge from
the hospital; and
° expenses incurred in the nursing facility
result from the same injury or illness
that caused the previous confinement.
AMOUNT The amount of reimbursement will not exceed 50%
PAYABLE of the maximum daily benefit payable for a hospital
confinement in a semi -private room. The benefit
is paid for up to 90 days of confinement for one
continuous period of disability. Benefits are
subject to the General Limitations which appear
in this proposal.
TWO OR MORE Two or more periods of confinement will be
PERIODS OF considered one period of confinement unless:
C nTJ7 TNTFMVN1T
° there are 14 days or more between each
confinement;
the confinements are due to unrelated causes;
° a covered employee has returned to active
full-time work for at least one day between
confinements; or
° a covered dependent has not been confined for
at least three months from the date of previous
confinement.
GPP-762-84
A
Convalescent Care Benefits
DEFINITION A skilled nursing facility is defined under the
OF "SKILLED" Group Policy as a licensed institution that:
NURSING
FACILITY" ° provides nursing care and rehabilitation
services;
° dispenses and administers drugs;
° charges a fee in return for services for
its patients;
provides skilled nursing care by licensed
nurses supervised 24 hours a day by a
registered nurse;
° provides in-patient services for nursing
care for sick or injured persons;
° has 24 hour access to a doctor;
keeps a daily medical record of each patient;
and
° is not mainly a rest, old age or custodial care
home. It also does not include a place that is
a hotel or a place that mainly provides care and
treatment of alcoholics or drug addicts.
GPP-763-84
-'ern Life Insurance
DEATH BENEFIT The amount for which an employee is insured will be paid
to his beneficiary in the event of his death at anv time
or place, and from any cause. Payment may be arranged as
a lump sum, monthly income, or a combination of the two.
BENEFICIARY An employee may name any beneficiary he desires and may change
his designation whenever he wishes.
WAIVER OF If an insured employee becomes totally disabled prior to
PREMIUMS age 60, his insurance may be kept in force without premium
payment provided that such disability was continuous for
at least nine months and that satisfactory proof was
furnished to New England Life within 12 months from the date
of commencement. Annual written evidence of the continuance
of total disability must be furnished to New England Life
to keep the insurance in force.
When approved by New England Life, the amount of insurance
provided during a continuance of the total disability will
be the amount for which the employee was insured on the
date of discontinuance of premium payments.
If the amounts of insurance shown in the Schedule of Benefits
for those actively employed are reduced or terminated, the
same conditions will apply to those insured under the above
total disability provisions.
Any loss of insurance because of reduction or termination
may be recovered under the "Conversion Privilege" provision
on the same basis as termination of employment. Termination
of the Group Policy or this coverage will not in itself
terminate insurance being continued under the total disability
provisions.
TERMINATION An employee's insurance ceases 31 days after his employment
OF INSURANCE terminates. Each terminating employee has this 31 day period
AND CONVERSION in which, without evidence of insurability, he may convert
PRIVILEGE his insurance to any form of individual insurance except term
insurance and any policy containing disability or other
supplementary benefits then being issued by New England Life.
ASSIGNMENT OF An employee may assign his insurance in order to remove
INSURANCE "incidents of ownership" from his possession. This, on the
advice of his attorney, may be recommended to reduce estate
taxes in some situations.
G PP -630-78
Outpatient Incentive Benefits
OUTPATIENT The outpatient incentive benefits included in
INCENTIVE this proposal are designed especially to
BENEFITS encourage appropriate use of medical care
services. This cost effective approach includes
financial incentives (100% coinsurance with no
deductible applied) for:
�J OUTPATIENT All covered expenses associated with surgery
SURGERY performed in a doctor's office, a freestanding
surgical center, an outpatient clinic, or a
hospital's outpatient facility.
PRE -ADMISSION All covered expenses associated with diagnostic
TESTING tests performed before a hospital stay or out-
patient surgery.
SECOND All covered expenses associated with obtaining
SURGICAL the opinion of a board certified, consulting
OPINIONS surgeon before undergoing elective, non -emergency
surgery.
OUTPATIENT All covered expenses associated with outpatient
TREATMENT treatment of an accidental injury - whether
OF ACCIDENTAL incurred in an emergency room or any other
INJURIES outpatient facility including a doctor's office.
C
GPP-765-84
Deductible and Stop -Loss Provisions
INDIVIDUAL The deductible amount shown in the Schedule of
CALENDAR Benefits applies to covered medical expenses only
YEAR once in any one calendar year to each individual
DEDUCTIBLE covered under the Group Policy.
FAMILY If during the same calendar year two or more family
DEDUCTIBLE members incur covered expenses that are used to
MAXIMUM satisfy their individual deductibles, and the sum
of these expenses exceeds the family deductible
amount shown in the Schedule of Benefits, no further
deductible will be required for the remainder of
the calendar year for any member of that family.
INDIVIDUAL Any covered medical expenses incurred in the last
AND FAMILY three months of a calendar year which have been
CARRY-OVER used towards satisfaction of the individual and/or
PROVISION family deductible may be used toward satisfaction
of individual and family deductibles in the immed-
iately succeeding calendar year.
INDIVIDUAL When the coinsurance portion of individual and/or
AND FAMILY family covered medical expenses has reached the
STOP -LOSS totals shown in the Schedule of Benefits, all other
PROVISION covered medical expenses in excess of any applicable
deductible amount will be paid in full for the balance
of a calendar year. However, this provision does not
apply to covered expenses incurred for special (private
duty) nursing care or for expenses incurred for mental
and nervous disorders unless expenses were incurred
for hospital confinement or shock therapy.
INDIVIDUAL Any covered medical expenses incurred in the last
AND FAMILY three months of a calendar year which exceeded the
COINSURANCE deductible and were reimbursed at less than 100%
CARRY-OVER may be applied toward satisfaction of the applicable
stop -loss provision in the immediately succeeding year.
However, this provision does not apply to covered
expenses incurred for special (private duty) nursing
care or for expenses incurred for mental and nervous
disorders unless expenses were incurred for hospital
confinement or shock therapy.
COMMON If two or more members of the same family sustain injuries
ACCIDENT in the same accident; covered expenses incurred due to
PROVISION the accident will be reimbursed according to the
coinsurance level shown in the Schedule of Benefits
after satisfaction of only one individual's calendar
year deductible amount.
G P P-746-84
Benefit Processing
BENEFIT All claims will be processed through New England
PAYMENT Life's computerized claims system, NELCARE. With
NELCARE, claims will receive the careful personal
attention of our claim examiners while NELCARE's
on-line system provides calculation of benefits.
Employees will receive an easy -to -understand
explanation of benefits (EOB) that details all
the charges and benefits payable along with a
check or a copy of the check if benefits have
been assigned.
COORDINATION
OF BENEFITS
New England Life understands that prompt and
accurate processing of claims is the most important
element of an employee benefit program. Our stream-
lined approach to benefit processing utilizes
state-of-the-art technology and a highly trained
professional staff to provide a consistently
high quality of service.
Our nationwide network of Regional Benefits Offices
and computerized claims processing systems work
together to ensure that employers get the most
for their premium dollar.
If a covered employee or dependent is eligible
for benefits under two or more group benefit
plans, including any "no fault" auto insurance
plans, benefits on a combined basis will be
limited to 100% of covered expenses where
permitted by state law.
GPP-759-84
Direct Pay Plan
THE TAKE -IT -EASY
WAY TO HANDLE
GROUP INSURANCE
CLAIHS
The Direct Pay Plan is a unique method of handling
group insurance claims. It helps the group policy-
holder --the employer --to streamline his claims han-
dling. Claims are sent direct to New England Life
Claim Offices by the hospital or, for other expen-
ses, by the employee. Hospital benefits are paid
direct to the hospital --other benefits are paid di-
rect to the employee, unless assigned.
It's simple, speedy, and there's practically no claim
paperwork by the employer.'
Group Claim Office
NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY
501 BOYLSTON STREET BOSTON MASS 02117 • 16171 266-3700
rhe following benefits are provided to covered employees and dependents for non-ocollpa-
tional .lines or injury Call the telephone numoer below for nerd dation of coverage
HOSPITAL BENEFITS OTHER MEDICAL BENEFITS
EMPLOYER POLICY NO
DEPENDENT
EMPLOYEE BILLING INSTRUCTIONS
To verify Coverat)e Call ON REVERSE SIDE
There are two optional approaches to the certifica-
tion of an individual employee's coverage:
Certification to hospitals and doctors by
the employer.
Certification by the local New England Life
Claim Offir-n_
If you'd like to hear the complete story about
D.Y.P., we will be pleased to provide you details.
G P P -460-7 5
Survivor's Health Benefit
The Survivor's Health Benefit is designed to provide
continuing medical coverage for the dependents of a
deceased employee. The premium for dependent medical
care is waived, and the coverage on dependents in force
at the time of the employee's death will continue for
any eligible dependent until the earliest of:
(1) Two years from the employee's death.
(2) Remarriage of the .-mployee's spouse.
(3) Any eligible dependent becomes insured under any group
coverage.
(4) Termination of dependent status as defined in the
policy.
(5) Termination of dependent insurance under this policy.
(6) Termination of this policy.
Dependent insurance will not be terminated solely because:
(1) A policy amendment changes or excludes the class to
which the employee belonged.
(2) A dependent becomes eligible for Medicare Supplement
Benefit.
G P P-454- 74
TEFRA and Medicare
TEFRA The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act
(TEFRA) mandates that employer health plans
are the primary payer of health benefits for
employees age 65 to 70 who elect to be covered
by the group plan. For those affected employees
who elect coverage under the group plan, under
which the employer has chosen TEFRA, New England
Life will be the primary payer of benefits under
the Group Policy and there will be no reduction
in the benefit payable by New England Life due
to Medicare enrollment or eligibility.
TEFRA applies to covered employees if:
° The employee is at active full-time work; and
° Is age 65 through 69.
TEFRA applies to a covered dependent spouse if:
The spouse is the spouse of a covered employee
who age 65 through 69 and is actively at full-time
work; and
The spouse is age 65 through 69.
MEDICARE There are two types of Medicare coverage; Part A,
INTEGRATION which principally provides hospitalization benefits
and Part B, which provides other extensive coverage.
Employees who are eligible for Medicare that elect
to retain their Medicare coverage or who are not
affected by TEFRA will receive benefits as
outlined in the following:
° Any Medicare benefits (Part A or B) for which
a covered employee or dependent is eligible,
whether or not actually enrolled in Medicare,
will be deducted from the benefits otherwise
payable by New England Life.
GPP-758-84
General Limitations
GENERAL No benefit is payable for any of the following
LIMITATIONS charges. The expenses incurred for any of these
charges may not be used to satisfy any deductible
under the Group Policy.
° Charges not recommended and approved by a
doctor for the care or treatment of a
sickness or injury;
° Charges for a treatment, service or supply
which is not medically necessary for the care
and treatment or diagnosis of the sickness or
injury, according to generally accepted medical
standards;
° Charges not incurred and billed to any covered
employee or dependent;
° Charges paid or covered by a charitable or
governmental public program;
° Charges for experimental or investigational
procedures, drugs or treatment methods;
° Charges made for any care, treatment,.service,
or supply that is furnished by the United
States Government or in any institution
that is owned or run by the United States
Government;
° Charges for custodial care;
° Charges for medical care provided by a spouse,
child, or parent;
Charges made for general health examinations,
prophylaxis, or immunization procedures.
But this does not apply to charges for the
treatment of an injury caused by an accident
that occurs while covered;
° Charges made for eye exams, including refractions,
eyeglasses or eyeglass fitting. But this does
not apply to charges for treatment of an injury
caused by an accident that occurs while covered;
C
GPP-766-84
General Limitations
GENERAL Charges made for dental care, except as may
LIMITATIONS be provided under any Group Dental Benefits
(Continued) under the Group Policy. This limitation also
does not apply to major dental surgery to
remove cysts, granulomas, tumors or bony
impactions, nor to dental work that is needed
to repair damage to sound natural teeth if
the damage is caused by an accident that occurs
while an employee or covered dependent is
covered under the plan. It also does not apply
to hospital confinement for the extraction of
teeth when at least five teeth are extracted
during the same period of confinement. In
addition, this limitation does not apply to
major reconstructive oral surgery;
° Charges made for cosmetic surgery. This
limitation does not apply to charges that
result from an injury that is caused by
an accident if surgery is performed within
90 days after the accident. We may pay for
surgery after the 90th day only if proof is
given that it was not reasonably possible to
perform it sooner;
Charges that exceed the usual and customary
charge for the treatment, service or supply
in the locality where furnished;
° Charges made for a sickness or injury that
results from war or an act of war;
° Charges for injury caused by an accident
that arises out of or in the course of
employment;
° Charges made for sickness that is payable
by Worker's Compensation or a similar law;
° Charges incurred by any dependent (other
than a dependent spouse) due to pregnancy,
including resulting childbirth, miscarriage
or abortion;
° Charges for educational testing and training;
and
Charges for a sickness or injury that is
caused by participation in a crime.
GPP-767-84
mss
2`�
� ]
•-�elf
. _ - _. G.- �
- -��•.'._ _.i"f-�'
r _ - .
'`�'
:d
•- �=---- _ _ --
tie
_
...cg
77
44
VL
17
ti
(� //O -j -� - -j
ad -a�1
af - Z4-�,
s-�uo 4-6�
0,4,-N
�f'dcrosa��J rdvn�� �.� ✓ py7 'z7� rrd�j
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, September 4, 1984 at
the hour of 7:30 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilman Wood
ROLL CALL
Present: Barks, Cioffi, DeBellis, Wood, Mayor Brutsch
Absent: City Clerk Reviczky
City Manager Meyer advised Council and the audience that this
meeting had been requested by the City Council to meet with the
School Board. However, the School Board unanimously declined to
meet with the City Council. Since there were a number of urgent
matters to be handled, tonight's meeting is held as a Special Meeting.
1. SPECIFYING DATE FOR SECOND SEPTEMBER MEETING.
City Manager Meyer presented the staff report indicating
that Mayor Brutsch, Councilmen Barks and DeBellis, City Clerk
Reviczky and her Deputy would all be attending the League of
California Cities Annual Conference in Anaheim on September 25,
the scheduled City Council Meeting date.
City Attorney Post stressed there was a procedural technicality
whereby Council could indicate who is going to be present at
the September 25 meeting and who is not. By doing this, if
there is not going to be a quorum, the affect would be to
continue the September 11 meeting to the meeting of October 9.
City Manager Meyer advised that he had requested the various
Departments not to schedule any items for the meeting of
September 25.
2. RCC DELEGATE APPOINTMENT
Mayor Brutsch advised Council the the regular meetings of the
RCC are scheduled for the same time as his supervisory meetings
at his place of employment, thus he requested that another
Councilman be appointed to replace him.
Councilman Barks was appointed to replace Mayor Brutsch.
3. REFERENDUM PETITION/SPECIAL ELEC'T'ION - HOTEL DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT. Memorandum from City Attorney Charles J. Post
dated September 4, 1984.
Mayor Brutsch read City Attorney Post's memorandum into the
record. City Attorney Post stated that the Election Code
states that the certification of the referendum signatures
must be done at a Regular Meeting of the City Council. He
felt that this could be challenged by Council if they so
desire.
-1- Minutes 9-4-84
IV,
REFERENDUM PETITION (continued)
Mayor Brutsch advised that the ruling on the litigation
regarding the first referendum petition (the Specific Plan)
should be available for the meeting of September 11.
ACTION - In the event that the judge does not rule on the
first referendum petition (the Specific Plan), the City Clerk
should have all the necessary documents before the City Council
for their consideration to also put the Specific Plan referendum
petition on the ballot as well.
Motion Barks, second Wood. So ordered.
ADJOURNMENT
On the order of the Chair, the Special Meeting of the City Council
of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned to a Closed Executive
Session immediately following this meeting, at 7:50 P.M., on
September 4, 1984. There being no action taken, the Closed
Executive Session was adjourned at the hour of 9:15 P.M. to a
Regular Meeting of the City Council to be held on Tuesday, September 11,
1984 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. preceded by a Closed Executive Session
at 6:30 P.M.
Mayor Brutsch asked that this meeting be adjourned in memory of
Pat Anderson, 80 years of age, who passed away at 5:00 P.M. today
of pneumonia. He was a very active Councilmember of the City of
Hermosa Beach from 1960 to 1968.
-2- Minutes 9-4-84
i
V8 -TT -6 so-4nUTW
-T-
's4uu.z.zuM 90 uoTgpTTaoupo anoaddu os - NOIIDV
'%86T 'T£ qsnbnV PagpP uopgPTOO
uuiaoN aoanspaas ,�qTO uioag uznpueaow@W : S4uuaaPM Jo uOTgPTTaouuO (p)
•anogp paaagszbaa SP
SO -40A ,ON,, BUT -40U paaapaO OS •uosgnag ao�PW puooaS 'sxaug uOTg0W
" (�up�TnsuoO QdA - uopgPTOO auiaON) Z08�T - uosgnjg ao,�PW pug'
(uOTSaanTQ aTTuannr r�pg ugnoS) S06VT - POOM '(oTUTTO aaad �Pg
u-qnOS) 806�T - pooM :sMOTTOJ SP s040n ,ON,, buTaa-.STbaa PUP 8S8VT
PUP TT8bT '66L%T 'sou s4uaaapm papzon BUT40u anTsnTouT T£6tT
.ubnoaug 96L�T •sou squuaaPM pua spuPuiap anoadd72 os - NOIZOFZ
V861 'TT a0quia4d0S
: Squaaapm pine spuuuiac (0)
sagnuTW anoaddP os - NOIZOFI
'�86T '� aagiva-4daS uO pTau TTounoO
�qTO uoPag aSOuzaaH auq 90 buT4GOui T2ToadS : so nUTW 90 TPnoaddV
• sagnuTui OAOaddu os - NOISOFZ
'V86T '8Z-.snbnV uo pTau TTounoO
,�4TO uOuag asOUIaOH aq4 90 buT4aaui aPTnbag :sagnuTW JO TPnoaddV
•paaapao os •uos-4nag aolpW puOOas 'SNaP9 UOT40W
•(a) pup (b) uo a40A ,ON,, u paaa-4szbaa pooM ueulTzounoO •uosgnag
( d ) pup ' pooM - ( N ) ' POoLq - ( T ) 'Pooh - ( J ) ' POOM - ( o )
:,I�qzaeTo a0J aapao uz pagSTT aap qnq uoTssnoSzp agpapdas
aOJ paTTnd aaOM uozuM suzagT buTMOTT09 auq JO uoTgdooxo auq ugTM
(a) ubnoaLIq (e) suiagT 'aapuaTPO 4uasuoO auq anoaddu os - NOII3V
HE
(P)
UVCINH'IV3 wNHSN00 ' T
t86T '£T -L aagogoo 'xaaM S4ST-4aV PaTqusTQ
t86T '£Z -LT aaquiagdaS 'xaaM u0zgn4T4suoO
V96T 'ZZ --9T aaquiaqdaS ':,{aaM SzsoagTd oTgs,i0
UPWgSaTH NOTC e�q gsomT4gnoS - suaZTgTD papaPgag
aOj uOTq TOOSSV auq Woaj uosgnag •Z Z�ap0 ao'ppw os
- SNOIIVWV' DOHd
- NOILVINSSaUd
auoN - quasqv
uosqnag ao�iaW 'pooM 'sTTTagaQ 'TJJozO 'sxaPg - quasaad
`I`IKO 'I'IO2i
TJJOTD uuurTTounoO - aDNVIOS'IZX d0 HOQH'Id
•quasaad uauiTTOunOO TTK - *W'd 0£=9 - NOISSHS QHSO'IO
'N -d S0:8 go anon auq
qu b86T 'TT aaqui:aqdaS 'Appsans uo pTau 'PTuaoJTTPO 'uOUag asouiaaH
90 r,4z0 aqq JO rIIONII00 2�SIO HHS d0 ONIZHaN 23K'If10Hd HHS d0 SHSIININ y
CONSENT CALENDAR (continued)
(e) Award of Bid: Strand Improvements, 8th Street to 15th Street.
Memorandum from Acting Public Works Director William Grove
dated September 6, 1984.
ACTION - To award the bid for Strand improvements between Eighth
Street and Fifteenth Street to Onicnac Custom Contracting
Company for a cost of $195,787.
(f) Recommedation to Authorize the City Manager to Sign a
Supplemental Memorandum of Understanding with the Middle
Management Bargaining Unit to Provide Special Duty Pa_y for the
Police Department Computer Coordinator. Memorandum from Police
Chief Frank Beeson dated September 6, 1984.
ACTION - To receive and file. Motion DeBellis, second Brutsch.
So ordered.
(g) Recommendation to Approve the Police Department Reserve Officer
By -Laws. Memorandum from Police Chief Frank Beeson dated
September 6, 1984.
ACTION - To approve the Hermosa Beach Police Reserve Officers
By -Laws revised September 1984.
(h) Detective Bureau Monthly Report: August 1984.
ACTION - To receive and file.
(i) City Manager Activity Report. Memorandum from City Manager
Gregory T. Meyer dated September 6, 1984.
ACTION - To receive and file.
Motion DeBellis, second Mayor Brutsch. So ordered.
(j) Tentative Future Agenda Items.
ACTION - To receive and file.
(k) Approval in Concept to Pursue Tax Exempt Financing for Public
Parking in Alpha Beta Shopping Center. Memorandum from City
Manager Gregory T. Meyer dated September 7, 1984.
ACTION - To approve the staff recommendation authorizing the
City Manager to proceed with developing approximately $3,000,000
in Certificates of Participation tax exempt financing for a
parking structure at the Park Pacific Shopping Center with the
stipulation that the developer be required to submit a written
request for the actions outlined.
Motion Wood, second Barks.
AYES - Barks, Cioffi, Wood
NOES - DeBellis, Mayor Brutsch
-2- Minutes 9-11-84
CONSENT CALENDAR (continued
(1) A Resolution of Intent to Direct the Planning Commission to
Examine Sections 404, 505, 555, 606, and 706 of the Zoning Code
as they Pertain to Lot Coverage to Determine Whether or not Square
Footage of Second Story Balconies is included in Calculation of
Lot Coverage. Memorandum from Planning Director Pamela Sapetto
dated September 6, 1984.
ACTION - To adopt Resolution No. 84-4754 entitled "A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO EXAMINE SECTIONS 404, 505, 555, 606, AND 706
OF THE ZONING CODE AS THEY PERTAIN TO LOT COVERAGE TO DETERMINE
WHETHER OR NOT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SECOND STORY BALCONIES IS
INCLUDED IN CALCULATIONS OF LOT COVERAGE."
Motion Barks, second Mayor Brutsch. So ordered.
(m) A Resolution of Intent to Direct the Planning Commission to
Consider Amending Sections 401 and 405 of the Zoninq Code as
it pertains to Sideyard Setbacks to Delineate a Maximum
Required Sideyard Setback of 5' for R-1 and R-2 Developments.
Memorandum from Planning Director Pamela Sapetto dated
September 6, 1984.
ACTION - To adopt Resolution No. 84-4755 entitled "A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENT TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTIONS 401 AND 501
OF THE ZONING CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO SIDEYARD SETBACKS TO
DELINEATE A MAXIMUM REQUIRED SIDEYARD SETBACK OF 5' FOR R-1 AND
R-2 DEVELOPMENTS."
Motion Barks, second Mayor Brutsch. So ordered.
(n) A Resolution of Intent to Direct the Planning Commission to
Consider Amending the Zoning Code, Section 1162, Off -Street
Parking, Requirements for New and Existing Construction, to
Allow Additions of 100 Square Feet, or less, Without a Variance.
Memorandum from Planning Director Pamela Sapetto dated
September 7, 1984.
ACTION - To adopt Resolution No. 84-4756 entitled "A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
ITS INTENT TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
AMENDING THE ZONING CODE, SECTION 1162, OFF-STREET PARKING,
REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, TO ALLOW
ADDITIONS OF 100 SQUARE FEET, OR LESS, WITHOUT A VARIANCE."
Motion Barks, second Mayor Brutsch. So ordered.
(o) ORDINANCE NO. 84-775 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH SETTING THE PARKING METER RATES THROUGHOUT
THE CITY TO TWENTY-FIVE CENTS ($.25) PER HALF HOUR. For waiver
of further reading and adoption.
ACTION - To waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 84-775
entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH SETTING THE PARKING METER RATES THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO
TWENTY-FIVE CENTS ($.25) PER HALF HOUR."
Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Barks. So ordered.
-3- Minutes 9-11-84
CONSENT CALENDAR (continued)
(p) ORDINANCE NO. 84-776 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N.S. 154,
SECTIONS 1301, 1302, 1304 AND 1309 AS THEY RELATE TO ADDITIONS
TO, AND REHABILITATION OF, NONCONFORMING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS.
For waiver of further reading and adoption.
ACTION - To waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 84-776
entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N.S. 154, SECTIONS 1301, 1302,
1304 AND 1309 AS THEY RELATE TO ADDITIONS TO, AND REHABILITATION
OF, NONCONFORMING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS."
Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Barks. So ordered.
(q) Approval of Job Description for Community Resources Recreation
Specialist. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana
Mastrian dated September 5, 1984.
ACTION - To approve the job description for the position
of Recreation Specialist and direct staff to proceed with the
Civil Service testing process for this position.
(r) Approval of Job Description for Community Resources Coordinator.
Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated
September 5, 1984.
2.
ACTION To approve the job description for the position of
Coordinator in the Department of Community Resources and
direct staff to proceed with the Civil Service testing process
for this position.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
(a) Letter from Roger Creighton dated August 28, 1984.
ACTION - To receive and file.
Motion Wood, second Barks. So ordered.
(b) Letter from Phylis A. Bratti dated September 7, 1984.
PROPOSED ACTION - To request the School Subcommittee to
approach the School Board and ask them to see if they can
work out a more lengthy termination period compatible with
the school calendar.
Motion Wood, second Mayor Brutsch
AYES - Wood, Mayor Brutsch
NOES - Barks, Cioffi, DeBellis
Motion fails
(c) Letter from Mr. & Mrs. Walter J. Taylor dated September 11,
1984.
ACTION - To receive and file.
Motion Cioffi, second Barks. So ordered noting a "NO"
vote by Councilman Wood
-4- Minutes 9-11-84
URARTMrq
3. AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR BUILDING, ELECTRICAL,
PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL PERMITS. Memorandum from Building and
Safety Director William Grove dated September 5, 1984.
The staff report was presented by Building Director Grove.
Councilman Wood requested a determination by the City Attorney
regarding his possible conflict of interest. City Attorney
Post advised he perceived no conflict of interest, however,
Councilman Wood abstained from discussion and voting.
The Hearing was opened. No one coming forward, the Hearing
was closed.
ACTION - To approve staff recommendation to receive oral and
written input followed by action to receive and file this
report.
Motion DeBellis, second Cioffi. So ordered noting the
abstention of Councilman Wood.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. PROPOSED PROSPECT HEIGHTS REZONING - RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE
PUBLIC HEARING. Memorandum from Planning Director Pamela
Sapetto dated September 6, 1984.
City Manager Meyer advised Council that this hearing had
not been properly noticed and asked that this item be continued
to the next regular meeting.
ACTION - To continue this item to the next regular meeting of
the City Council to be held on October 9.
Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Wood.
AYES - Barks, DeBellis, Wood, Mayor Brutsch
NOES - Cioffi
Councilman Wood requested the City Manager to provide him with
a copy of the zoning ordinance which zoned this particular
property.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
5. REPORT RE POSSIBLE SOUTH SCHOOL REZONING. Memorandum from
Planning Director Pamela Sapetto dated September 6, 1984.
City Manager Meyer presented the staff report asking that this
item be continued so that the proper noticing could be made.
ACTION - To continue this item to the meeting of October 9
per the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
Motion Barks, second DeBellis. So ordered.
-5- Minutes 9-11-84
MUNICIPAL MATTERS (continued)
6. STATUS REPORT RE REFERENDUM PETITION RE REPEALING HOTEL SPECIFIC
PLAN
City Attorney Post advised that the Court on September 11 had
agreed with the City's position that it was correct to refuse
to process the referendum petitions on the Specific Plan.
Therefore, Ordinance No. 84-751 is in effect.
7. REFERENDUM PETITION/SPECIAL ELECTION - HOTEL DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Reviczky
dated September 7, 1984. Supplemental information - Memorandum
from City Clerk Kathleen Reviczky dated September 11, 1984.
a. REFERENDUM PETITION SUFFICIENCY
ACTION - To receive and file the Certificate of Sufficiency
for the Referendum Petition against Ordinance No. 84-754
entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND
GREENWOOD AND LANGLOIS, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP,
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HOTEL AND CONFERENCE FACILITIES
IN THE CITY."
Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Barks. So ordered.
b. CALLING OF A SPECIAL ELECTION
ACTION - To adopt Resolution No. 84-4757 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A
SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY,
DECEMBER 11, 1984, FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED
ELECTORS OF THE CITY AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO APPROVING A
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND
GREENWOOD AND LANGLOIS, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP,
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HOTEL AND CONFERENCE FACILITIES IN
THE CITY."
Motion Wood, second Barks. So ordered.
C. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - SPECIFIED SERVICES
ACTION - To adopt Resolution No. 84-4758 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO
SAID CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1984."
Motion Wood, second Barks. So ordered.
d. WRITTEN ARGUMENTS/IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
ACTION - To adopt Resolution No. 84-4759 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS MEMBERS TO FILE A
WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE AND DIRECTING THE
CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS."
Motion Wood, second Barks. So ordered.
-6- Minutes 9-11-84
REFERENDUM PETITION/SPECIAL ELECTION (continued)
FURTHER ACTION - To authorize the "Friends of the Hotel
Committee" to write the argument in favor of the hotel
and the Petitioners against the Hotel to write the argument
against the hotel.
Motion Wood, second Mayor Brutsch. So ordered.
e. REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS
ACTION - To adopt Resolution No. 84-4760 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS
FOR CITY MEASURES SUBMITTED AT THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
OF DECEMBER 11, 1984."
Motion Wood, second Barks. So ordered.
8. REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION AND DIRECTION FOR REVIEW OF SIGN
ORDINANCE. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director
William Grove dated September 5, 1984.
Building Director Grove presented the staff report.
ACTION - That this item be tabled until Councilman Wood gets
back to Council with a Resolution of Intention to the Board of
Zoning Adjustments to help provide more specific direction on
the sign ordinance.
Motion Wood, second Mayor Brutsch. So ordered.
9. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION
Items (c), (f), (i) and (k) were pulled by Councilman Wood
and item (p) by Mayor Brutsch and were discussed at this time
but are listed in order on the Consent Calendar for clarity.
10. MEETING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT COMMISSION
The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach recessed at 9:55 P.M.
to a meeting of the Vehicle Parking District.
The meeting reconvened at 10:00 P.M.
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
a. Report on Laurel, Maryland's request to become Sister City.
Memorandum from City Manager Gregory T. Meyer dated
August 15, 1984.
ACTION - To approve the staff recommendation with a language
change to read "Friendship City" rather than "Sister City".
Motion Wood, second Cioffi. So ordered.
-7- Minutes 9-11-84
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (continued)
b. Request for Closed Session. Memorandum from City Manager
Gregory T. Meyer dated September 7, 1984.
ACTION - To convene a Closed Executive Session at 6:00 P.M.
on October 9, 1984 to Meet and Confer.
Motion DeBellis, second Wood. So ordered.
12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
a. Letter of Resignation from City Attorney Charles J. Post
dated September 11, 1984.
ACTION - To accept with regret the resignation of City
Attorney Post and have appropriate recognition prepared.
Motion Wood, second Mayor Brutsch. So ordered.
PROPOSED ACTION - To hold a
deal with this matter.
Motion DeBellis - dies for
Closed Personnel Session to
lack of a second.
PROPOSED ACTION - To solicit the services of Murray Kane
of the firm of Weiser, Kane, Ballmer and Berkman to be
interim City Attorney on a temporary basis and direct staff
to put together an RFP to solicit a permanent law firm
to handle the legal affairs of the City of Hermosa Beach.
Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Barks
Withdrawn by the maker of the motion with the concurrence
of the second.
FINAL ACTION - To table this item to a Closed Personnel
Session to be held at the end of this meeting.
Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Wood. So ordered.
b. Railroad Riqht-of-Way Subcommittee Report - Councilman Wood
No action has been taken since the last report.
C. Child Abuse Subcommittee Report - Councilman Cioffi
Councilmen Cioffi and DeBellis attended a meeting with
20 people in attendance representing the Hermosa Beach
Police Department, the Hermosa Beach School District,
the City Council and various preschools and private
agencies and individuals. Discussed in detail was the
police proposal and other ideas. Other individuals and
organizations were requested to submit proposals.
Councilman Cioffi stated that another follow-on meeting
would be held prior to returning with a recommendation to
the City Council by the second meeting in October. Written
notification of the meeting date will be sent to all those
attending the meeting (probably the first week in October).
-8- Minutes 9-11-84
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (continued)
d. Report from Councilman Barks re U.S./Mexico International
Sister Citv Convention
Councilman Barks presented an oral report with a written
report to follow. This convention was held August 20-26,
1984 in Guadalajara. They meet twice a year and the
first meeting in 1985 will be held in Oxnard. He also
advised that Redondo Beach will host the National Convention
in 1985.
13. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC - MATTERS OF AN URGENCY NATURE
None
14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Brutsch - asked the City Manager to check on the "litter -
letter from Mr. Keith regarding the old Biltmore site.
Mayor Brutsch - Councilwoman Russell/helicopters
ACTION - To send a letter to Councilwoman Russell indicating
Council support of her interest in legislating laws to
govern low-flying helicopters in the beach area.
Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Cioffi. So ordered noting
a "NO" vote by Councilman Wood.
Mayor Brutsch - Skunks above Prospect - General Services has
skunk traps, City Manager Meyer will investigate.
Mayor Brutsch - Police Department/Fire Department Subcommittee
Meeting - meeting date will be set - Councilman Cioffi
suggested once a month on a regular schedule.
Councilman Wood - Complimented Mark Matson on his investigation
of the illegal unit.
Councilman Wood - Yost vs. Thomas - City Attorney Post advised
that the Court concluded that the referendum does apply
in the Coastal Zone.
Councilman Wood - MSI Warrant (how authorized) - City Manager
Meyer advised this action was authorized by motion and he
will present written reply.
Councilman Wood - Mr. & Mrs. Friedman and Certificate of
Completion (permit expired).
ACTION - To refer this to the City Manager for a report
back on October 9. In the meantime have staff make verbal
contact with this individual to let them know of City
Council concern.
Motion Wood, second Cioffi. So ordered.
Councilman Wood - City Treasurer's Report not being available -
City Manager Meyer advised that the run was not complete
but it would be available for the October 9 meeting.
-9- Minutes 9-11-84
OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL (continued)
Councilman Wood - Closed Session Agenda Items - City Manager
Meyer advised that the unfinished agenda items would be
on the October 9 agenda.
Councilman DeBellis - Status of 60 Hermosa Avenue - Wants
it knocked down. City Attorney Post advised that this
civil suit will be in motion by the end of the month.
Councilman DeBellis - Little League Scoreboard
ACTION - To request that the City Clerk write a letter of
thanks to the President of the Hermosa Beach Little League
for the electronic scoreboard.
Motion DeBellis, second Mayor Brutsch. So ordered.
Councilman DeBellis - Striping on the Strand Walkway
ACTION - To request that the City Clerk write a letter of
thanks to John Hales regarding the striping of the Strand.
Motion DeBellis, second Cioffi. So ordered noting the
"NO" vote by Councilman Wood and Mayor Brutsch.
Councilman DeBellis - South School Parking Lot Status - City
Manager Meyer will have a report at the October 9 meeting.
Mayor Brutsch - Wee Care Fair September 23 - Asked for Council
support of this positive community effort.
Councilman Barks - Sister City Official Visit - Since 1978,
Hermosa Beach has made official visits to its Sister
City of Loreto, Mexico - tentative dates for the next visit
are November 8-12, 1984.
The City Council recessed to a Closed Executive Session at 10:45 P.M.
The regular meeting of the City Council reconvened at 11:30 P.M.
ACTION FROM CLOSED SESSION - To hire the firm of Weiser, Kane,
Ballmer and Berkman with Murray Kane assigned specifically to Hermosa
Beach as the interim City Attorney subject to termination upon seven
days notice.
Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Barks. So ordered noting a "NO" vote
by Councilmen DeBellis and Wood.
ADJOURNMENT
The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach
was adjourned at the hour of 11:35 P.M. on a motion by Councilman
Barks to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, September 25, 1984
at the hour of 7:30 P.M.
-10- Minutes 9-11-84
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Hermosa Beach held on Tuesday, September 25, 1984 at the hour of
7:30 P.M. in the Council Chamber, City Hall, City of Hermosa Beach.
RYIT T (AT T
Present: None
Absent: Barks, Cioffi, DeBellis, Wood, Mayor Brutsch
ADJOURNMENT
The Regular Meeting of the City Council held on Tuesday, September 25,
1984, was adjourned at 7:45 P.M. by City Clerk Kathleen Reviczky
due to the lack of a quorum with no Councilmen present to a Regular
Meeting to be held on Tuesday, October 9, 1984 at 7:30 P.M. preceded
by a Closed Executive Session at 6:00 P.M.
-1- Minutes 9-25-84