Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07/22/14
Written Communication from H. Longacre to the July 22, 2014 Council Agenda Item- #1 Oral/Written Communications (Page 1 of 11) + 2 additional CAD drawing pages Attention: City Manager's office and City Clerk: Please receive, and advance copy this written communication to those addressed under To: below, and also include on the July 22, 2014 Regular City Council meeting agenda under Oral/Written communications Item #1, and with the Granicus agenda postings for meeting. NOTE: If printing this document there are two additional drawing pages attached without pagination. Thank You. July 15, 2014 To: Councilmembers (Peter Tucker, Michael DiVirgilio, Nanette Barragan, Carolyn Petty, Hany Fangary), City Clerk, City Manager, Assistant to City Manager, Planning Commissioners, Public Works Commissioners, Finance Director, Community Development Director, Public Works Director, Police Chief, Fire Chief, and contract-City Attorney. From: Howard Longacre, a Hermosa Beach Resident. Re: "Mermaid Properties" development concerns. Reference: Prior Supplemental to the July 8, 2014 H.B. Council Agenda, Consent Item 2-c. "http://hermosabeach.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=4&clip_id=3169&meta_id=154019" Attached: Two additional one page drawings without pagination. Honorable Councilmembers and others: The following are my comments, given freely, and they are entirely my views and opinions on everything I've stated herein. For those willing to bother reading this or reviewing the proposed drawings, please forgive typos. There's bound to be a few. Unfortunately many decisions these days appear to be driven by money, or perceived money, or just flat out greed, with I believe too casual, if any, thought of the ramifications and the irreversibility of such decisions once made. Having lived as an adult in the South Bay, (Palos Verdes Peninsula, Manhattan Beach, and Hermosa Beach specifically) for the past 55 years, since 1959, I have been able to view firsthand a beautiful South Bay area to live (probably one of the finest on the planet climate- wise, and in so many other ways, i.e. pre-405-freeway and grid-lock traffic days), systematically being destroyed by the incredible ignorance and small-minded lack of hindsight and foresight of elected South Bay local city councils and their chosen, usually way- overpaid, big-government city managers. Written Communication from H. Longacre to the July 22, 2014 Council Agenda Item- #1 Oral/Written Communications (Page 2 of 11) + 2 additional CAD drawing pages South Bay politicians, for the most part, once elected to a local City Council have seemed to be Hell-bent on staying elected and sitting on their council dais for as long as possible, and more so than anything else. Why is that? I can only attribute it to ego, but also to the incredible patronization they receive from i.e., their local Chamber of Commerce, and others who have various needs for greed, or other self-centered and self-aggrandizing agendas. As such South Bay elected council politicians probably always have campaign donations in the back of their minds, and a belief that they are doing so much good, that they could not possibly do any wrong. Unfortunately the thing they can do wrong, so easily, is to continue destroying the South Bay by doing absolutely nothing to restrict density increases whenever possible. With regard to such, as you all should know or remember, Hermosa Beach did a lot to reduce density city-wide through the 1980s and into the beginning of the 21st century. Now however it seems like the newbies to Hermosa's councils of late have no understanding of all that went down before, and have a notion that the City can become wealthier by filling the town, especially the downtown with more cabs, more cars, more people, more chaos, and especially with more hotel units. Some on council appear to be horribly blinded by the perception of TOT, i.e. the 10% transient-occupancy-tax the city supposedly receives when someone rents a hotel unit for a night. TOT and sales tax (mainly from the sale of vehicles and other expensive items) is good but far from the all-everything if impacts result. I doubt that anyone would want automobile dealers or a return to grease-pits being located in Hermosa's downtown. However hotel rooms/units are again rearing their ugly head with some on Council and in Hermosa's city management who don't seem to understand that we've voted down hotels repeatedly in the downtown and for intelligent good reasons. However now that seems to be all out the window and even building hotels onto existing streets, and filling the downtown with parking structures seems the goal while residents are asleep at the switch. We "replaced" the prior city manager with one costing more, and now he has #1 an assistant city manager, #2 an economic development person, and #3 yet another individual training himself to be a future city manager, an "intern". So in place of Steve Burrell we now have four individuals doing City Manager stuff at significantly more cost. This is a 1.3 square mile town with residential property values below those of Manhattan Beach, yet we have better geography, own our and a better beach, and more. Our residential property values should be equal Manhattan Beach's if not more. Instead Hermosa Beach continues to run itself down by continuing to wreck the livability of the vast residential community, which is the real tax base of the City. How is that? By continuing to poison the town with the never-ending insane fixation on screwing around with Written Communication from H. Longacre to the July 22, 2014 Council Agenda Item- #1 Oral/Written Communications (Page 3 of 11) + 2 additional CAD drawing pages Hermosa's dinky-downtown. We maxed out the bars, we maxed out the Chamber of Commerce swap meets on the residents' two most-important summer three-day weekends, and now we are going to max-out downtown hotels, and all the negative impacts and wear and tear on the City that go with them 24/7. There has got to be a hidden agenda that the residents never hear about as only a bunch of lunatics would continue to damage their own environment with such lunacy as bringing in more and more people to Hermosa's dinky downtown and doing whatever possible to make it operate around the clock, 24/7, with more cabs racing around the town into the wee hours of the morning, and of course more chaos and need for costly public safety. People come here because it is still a better place than elsewhere. Then those that get into politics, the Chamber of Commerce, and some businesses seem to do all they can to wreck the town with more chaos, more intensity, and more impact for their own selfish needs. Now I want to talk a little about this "Mermaid" properties hotel proposal. It's being hyped as a "boutique" hotel as you all know. But of course there's nothing "boutique" about it. They need to call it what it is. It's being planned as the biggest and tallest development in the downtown in 75 years if built. This term "Boutique" is as disingenuous as the term "oil recovery", or the term that a few of the bar operators are now referring to their businesses, i.e. as being "hospitality businesses". Hospitality has always meant hotels as I recall. I have not heard of any of the bar owners in town being in the hotel business. If they are then perhaps they are doing that elsewhere. So then why do the oil drillers, E&B, try to pawn off oil-drilling as "oil recovery", and why do the hotel developers who want to build such a massive development, refer to it as a "Boutique", and why do bar-owners want to refer to themselves as being in the "Hospitality" business. The reason appears to be that they are all trying to fool and deceive the residents of Hermosa Beach in one way or another in their dealings with the government, and to use the town to stuff their wallets. And the Chamber of Commerce has been the most egregious for years in trying to disguise what they are about with pseudo-words or terms, and attempting to make their organization appear as if it's actually a part of Hermosa's official government. How do such become so shallow? With respect to the "Mermaid properties" hotel developers, they apparently want to have a higher height limit. They must feel they're better than all the others who have come before. They've already insulted the City in claiming that no other City has such and such a rule about things above the height limit. Raising the height limit is a non-starter and I have no concerns that that will flop big-time at the ballot box along with any three of the council who so stupidly place it there, especially Written Communication from H. Longacre to the July 22, 2014 Council Agenda Item- #1 Oral/Written Communications (Page 4 of 11) + 2 additional CAD drawing pages without putting on a measure to lower the height limit by 4-feet to match Manhattan Beach's very-successful 26-foot voted downtown height limit. These developers seem to want the City's Beach Drive easement abandoned for them. That's a non-starter too. Who on Council led them down the Primrose Lane and got them to even think for a second that that would play well in town? Then these "Mermaid" developers saw that the Beach House project got a level of parking for a mere one-time payment of $10,000 per parking space, essentially in perpetuity on the City's own land. So now this developer, with less land than the Beach House 96-Condo-Units hotel is built upon, wants the City to build parking structures for them on city property. Who on the present or past councils promised these developers that such would happen if they rolled- the-dice and closed escrow on the "Mermaid properties"? They plunked down some $20 million for the properties and now are playing sort of a game of charades to determine what they can weasel past the residents of Hermosa Beach, and the Council, it certainly does seem. The City should have great concerns about these developers if anything that was reported in the Los Angeles Times story of June 14, 2013 is even remotely pertinent. It's appearing very clear that Los Angeles County's former elected assessor, who's evidently still being compensated, but no longer doing the job, probably had no use for our democracy, or was too ignorant to understand what a democracy is about, and how it came to be. But wait, he could not have abused our democracy single- handedly, i.e. without some encouragement, so until that is all played out and fully understood; I certainly believe you on the Hermosa Beach Council should be very careful of making agreements with anyone remotely connected to such an ugly situation. I attached the Los Angeles Times article that I am speaking of to my submittal, that was on your July 8, 2014 item "2c" re: the subject "Boutique" hotel being on a future meeting agenda which I understand is to now be July 29th. My submittal is archived with the agenda materials on the Granicus at; "http://hermosabeach.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=4&clip_id=3169&meta_id=154019" . I am sure you all know that Manhattan Beach is not intensifying their downtown with hotels or considering having the people vote to raise their voted 26-foot height limit that's 4 feet lower than Hermosa's 30-foot height limit. And since when is 30 feet not more than enough for two nice stories above ground? When Manhattan Beach developed the "Metlox" site on Valley Drive they put all the parking underground, and then after significant public involvement allowed a hotel of only 38 rooms to be built. I wouldn't even call that hotel a boutique, but whatever. It's two stories and built to just their 26-foot height limit. Interestingly it sits on an area encompassing some 64,000 square feet of surface land area and has significant open space all around the hotel. That sure isn't the way Hermosa Beach does things, is it? Geez, you mean Manhattan Beach Written Communication from H. Longacre to the July 22, 2014 Council Agenda Item- #1 Oral/Written Communications (Page 5 of 11) + 2 additional CAD drawing pages didn't cram a 30-foot tall blockhouse-structure on every square inch of open space? No they didn't! Apparently a more intelligent mindset there. In Redondo Beach another Shade Hotel is to be built and it will have 58 rooms. I guess that's another "boutique" too. But it too is surrounded by open space. But here in Hermosa's dinky downtown where it seems absolutely anything goes, we already have the Beach House Hotel with 96-condo units built on less than half the land of Manhattan's 38-room Shade hotel. The Beach House hotel sits on only 31,158 square feet of land, and now the 30-foot tall big-box-monolith "CLASH" hotel (aka Raju's hotel) with 30-units is to be built on only 11,516 square feet of land. But then arrives the Mermaid Developers' hotel proposal with 101+ rooms to be built on just 25,371 square feet of land. Now for just those three Hermosa Beach downtown "boutique" hotels, that comes to a grand total of 227 rooms on a total of but 68,045 square feet of land. In other words in Manhattan's downtown they permitted a mere 38 units on about 64,000 square feet of land, while here in Hermosa Beach we are going to have 227 units on 68,045 square feet of land. An 8th grader with some math ability can quickly see that Hermosa Beach is allowing to be crammed into the dinky downtown six times as many units on a mere 6.3% more land. Now that's what you call HIGH DENSITY. There's nothing "boutique" about it. All should recall that we, the Hermosa Beach residents, voted down a 175-room hotel back in 1983. We also voted down a proposal for a 49 condo-unit timeshare project that was put on the ballot via a petition. Then in 1985 a hotel placed on the ballot by a council received a tie vote and thus it failed too. About the only thing that has passed for the downtown was to lower the height limit. And in 1991 that passed by almost 2 to 1. The residents today are far more concerned with density and what's going on in the downtown than ever before, so look for a 3 to 1 defeat this time if the Council is so foolish to place on the ballot raising the height limit anywhere in town except as required for E&B's idiotic oil drilling proposal, as per the secret oil drilling settlement agreement. Now regarding the information above regarding the hotel density comparisons as proposed or approved of late and the saturation of the downtown with more cabs, more chaos, and more high-density 24/7 living units, I created a little comparison spread sheet, that follows here. Written Communication from H. Longacre to the July 22, 2014 Council Agenda Item- #1 Oral/Written Communications (Page 6 of 11) + 2 additional CAD drawing pages In the above spread sheet you can note that the supposed developer of the "Mermaid Properties", is proposing an even higher density, just in hotel units than either the "Beach House" at 1 unit per 325 square feet of surface lane, or the "CLASH" at 1 unit per 384 square feet of land. The Mermaid Properties developer is proposing 1 unit per just 251 square feet of land, and that's simply the highest density of the three. Further the "Mermaid properties" developer is talking about additional businesses being in his massively-intensive development. This developer obviously wants to cram as much onto his properties to make as big a windfall as possible. Such is the need for greed, the incredible need greed these days. Let us not forget that the Manhattan Beach "Shade" hotel has just one unit per 1,684 square feet of surface land. In other words the Mermaid properties developer wants his development to have 6.7 times as many units per square-feet of land as that of the Manhattan Beach Shade hotel. That's more than unacceptable, that's flat out outrageous and disgusting. That one or more council members have only perhaps looked at the few dollars in TOT, rather than the net impact on the residential quality of life, indicates such councilmember(s) need to start asking themselves, "what exactly is it that makes each of us so self-assured about increasing the density of Hermosa Beach's dinky downtown". Now no one likes to be harped at but expect a lot more as some on council may believe it is only me making all the noise. Bobko probably thought that way back. Right! Bobko who? Written Communication from H. Longacre to the July 22, 2014 Council Agenda Item- #1 Oral/Written Communications (Page 7 of 11) + 2 additional CAD drawing pages Back in the late 1980's there were two ladies on Hermosa's council who ran for re-election to a second term, but who were soundly booted out after the one term due to their arrogance in being above listening to residents even though they actually were doing some good things for the city. Now, what I have not yet mentioned with the high density of Hermosa's 3 latest downtown hotels, comes yet even more density in parking structures, except for the CLASH, which is "fully-cram-parked" on its own property. You see, the "Mermaid properties" developers evidently want the City to give it additional city land rights in some manner to stick its required parking upon. As I see it, that means those developers are going to have to fork over approximately $10 million for 100 parking spaces to cover land purchases and/or land value and construction costs, and this for the building of more parking structures above ground, perhaps south of the abomination known as the "North Pier Parking Structure" and elsewhere in the downtown. Who but an ignoramus would take the super-valuable dinky-downtown's limited land to build concrete parking-structure behemoths above ground? That's an obscene waste of land at the beach. Something that only a super-ignoramus, or a super-super-ignoramus would even contemplate doing, i.e., building parking structure monoliths above ground, around Hermosa's dinky downtown, a few feet from Hermosa's magnificent beachfront. Hermosa Beach needs no more ignorant planning followed by the building of parking structure monoliths above ground anywhere west of Valley Drive. We've already been there and done that, and most stupidly, to provide parking for late night bar-hoppers. And how is it that we now have 200+ cabs racing around town at all hours of day and night? How to trash beautiful Hermosa Beach? Just leave it to brain-dead pro-bar Hermosa councils, and the virtually 99% useless Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce with their never-ending fixation on Hermosa's dinky downtown; a downtown that was wonderful up through the 1980s for men, women, and even children. Then the need for greed arrived big time, the incredible NEED FOR GREED. Let me be clear. I do not support the placement of one more hotel room-unit in the downtown as they represent high-density development that belongs on the highway, not in Hermosa's downtown. This is a daytime beach town, and a nighttime, very dense residential bedroom community. Hermosa Beach needs not one more thing that is in any manner primarily operating in the evening and late night and especially not 24/7 with transients. Again if it is you on Council and with the Chamber of Commerce that wants to keep intensifying the dinky downtown, you should be honorable and state that outright, dumb as that would be to state. When you don't state that clearly and try to wrap it in double-speak (especially Councilmember Michael DiVirgilio) you, in my view, are certainly little better than a crook. Written Communication from H. Longacre to the July 22, 2014 Council Agenda Item- #1 Oral/Written Communications (Page 8 of 11) + 2 additional CAD drawing pages With respect to providing required parking for developments, it is my view that this developer should be providing his required parking, on or below his own development site, as all developers should be required to, and as even the developer of the "CLASH" hotel- monstrosity is in fact to be accomplishing by following the City's incredibly loosey-goosey code. The Mermaid property developer has plenty of land to build less density, and also fully park his project on or under his own site, again as the CLASH hotel monstrosity is doing. This developer bought the property for a reasonable amount, and now obviously wants to build the maximum on the cheap, and I am referring to the parking. The "Mermaid" developer should take the money he wants to expend on parking on the City's land and put his parking under his project on his own land, with at least one level of basement parking. It is not rocket science to build a one level basement parking area below grade, even with continuous water intrusion at 7 or 10 feet. A cofferdam is first constructed. Then excavation of the basement while temporarily dewatering is accomplished, and finally a concrete seal of the bottom of the excavation is accomplished. 100 parking spaces can be easily achieved with a one-level basement and some below grade Hermosa Beach easements being granted. The City could grant an under-"The Strand" easement to the West of the developers ocean- front lots, and also an easement under "Pier Plaza" for 40 to 50 feet to the South of the ocean-front lots. Further the developer could receive and easement to the North of the ocean-front lots, presently where the "Good Stuff" restaurant is and for approximately 30 feet into 13th Street. This would be for the purposes, ONLY, to build below grade, a one level parking basement. I have attached two drawings, the first showing the Mermaid properties, and the second showing a nominal (far from fully detailed) parking plan to show that 100 parking spaces (to be valet-serviced) can easily be located in a non-complicated, single-level, below grade under a structure which would then be built to the City's maximum height limit of 30 feet above original grade. Additional parking could be achieved with an easement to the North of the ocean-front lots as mentioned, but was not included in the drawings to follow. Any such easements under the Strand or Pier Plaza would require the posting of bonds by the developer to ensure that the surface conditions were restored to pristine original condition, and prior to any construction being accomplished above grade on the top of the parking basement, with such above grade structures being only above the developers owned parcels, not on any easements granted by the City. I believe the people of this City are ready to vigorously reject this nonsensical hotel intensification of the downtown. Written Communication from H. Longacre to the July 22, 2014 Council Agenda Item- #1 Oral/Written Communications (Page 9 of 11) + 2 additional CAD drawing pages No matter how nice-sounding, or how much lipstick is applied to such pig developments, these high-density hotel developments will nonetheless be negative to the long-term well- being of Hermosa's residential quality of life, the very thing that makes residential properties so valuable in the first place. I have much more to say regarding the "Need-For-Greed" by both developers of hotels, oil drilling, etc., and for that matter the City itself. However time does not permit in this submittal. In the following then, note that the second drawing is rotated to the vertical, although the "Mermaid" property lots form a slight parallelogram and are oriented somewhat West of North as you walk North on the Strand. I have shown a rectangular parking basement level within the confines of the actual parallelogram site and the potential City-granted below-grade easements for the parking-basement. Note that I have been somewhat generous in that the interior of the parking-basement shown is a full two feet from the property lines and edge of any potential granted-easements. The parking basement should be able to be built wider and longer, i.e., larger than I have indicated in the drawing. The "Mermaid" developer should own and fully control the parking for his project and have it all under his own structure, mostly on his own site. I cannot understand developers who claim they are so good at building things and then want to build what I would call a half-assed project. If they are incapable of building a parking basement on this large a site then they need to pack up and high-tail it out of town. They can join E&B at the exit in so far as I am concerned, and probably a whole lot of others too. To Hell with these folk who want to wreck Hermosa Beach to fatten their wallets. To Hell with them all. And to Hell with ignorant Hermosa policies and phony-baloney, set-up type "GOALS" that concentrate ad nauseam on intensifying Hermosa's dinky downtown with transients, while so-often ignoring the vast residential community, its quality of life, and not to mention the Pacific Coast Highway and Aviation corridors where commercial development is forever given not so much as the time of day. Two drawings follow and please note: They are repeated in higher resolution direct-PDF immediately following as non-numbered pages 12 and 13. Written Communication from H. Longacre to the July 22, 2014 Council Agenda Item- #1 Oral/Written Communications (Page 10 of 11) + 2 additional CAD drawing pages Written Communication from H. Longacre to the July 22, 2014 Council Agenda Item- #1 Oral/Written Communications (Page 11 of 11) + 2 additional CAD drawing pages Att: The above two drawings follow as Direct-PDFs, however without pagination. They may be zoomed for greater detail. 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74237 7/3/2014 00321 A T AND T 2481349454-June 1 Circuit Billing - June '14 001-2101-4304 26.94 3107966526-June 7 Circuit Billing - June '14 001-2101-4304 118.79 3312546071-June 7 Circuit Billing - June '14 001-2101-4304 57.31 3332676156-Jun 7 Circuit Billing - June '14 001-2101-4304 187.19 3332676160-Jun 7 Circuit Billing - June '14 001-2101-4304 59.09 3332676161- Jun7 Circuit Billing - June '14 001-2101-4304 59.09 3332676164-June 7 Circuit Billing - June '14 001-2101-4304 50.40 3332676165-June 7 Circuit Billing - May '14 001-2101-4304 50.40 Total : 609.21 74238 7/3/2014 06349 ACTIVE NETWORK INC, THE 11057912 Dynamag 3 Black Magnesafe 001-4601-4201 95.92 Total : 95.92 74239 7/3/2014 18577 ALBANO, MATILDA 04131 Cash Key Deposit Refund/ # 36318 001-2117 10.00 Total : 10.00 74240 7/3/2014 06421 ALL STAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 172429 Chain Saw Blades 001-2201-5401 894.67 173506 Class A Foam 001-2201-5401 382.59 Total : 1,277.26 74241 7/3/2014 17442 ALMANZA, EDWARD P 20 Project Mgr-Enviro Rpt/ 5-13 to 6-13-14 001-2109 29,551.18 Total : 29,551.18 1Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74242 7/3/2014 18269 ANDERSON PENNA PARTNERS INC 2673a CIP REPORT PRODUCTION SUPPORT/ MAR 14 001-4202-4201 1,250.00 Total : 1,250.00 74243 7/3/2014 18575 ANGELTON, NICOLE 7768440 Citation Refund # 200099480 001-3302 53.00 Total : 53.00 74244 7/3/2014 14898 AOKI, ELAYNE 2101-04279 Tuition Reimbursement / Summer 2014 001-2101-4317 1,572.83 Total : 1,572.83 74245 7/3/2014 13609 ARROYO, ERIC 380 Background Investigations/ Jun 14 001-2101-4201 1,080.00 Total : 1,080.00 74246 7/3/2014 05179 AT AND T 0193608382001/June`Long Dist Charges/June 001-2101-4304 6.59 0193608382001/May Long Dist Charges/May '14 001-2101-4304 6.64 001-2201-4304 0.01 001-1204-4304 0.01 001-4601-4304 0.01 Total : 13.26 74247 7/3/2014 13361 AT AND T MOBILITY 287016141723-May Cell Phone Usage - 5/07 to 6/06/14 001-4202-4304 226.72 Total : 226.72 74248 7/3/2014 16660 ATHENS SERVICES 4040180214-2 EXTRA WORK - GRAFFITI REMOVAL/ FEB 14 001-3104-4201 47.57 4040180514-1 CITYWIDE SWEEPING & CLEANING/ MAY 14 001-3104-4201 12,024.25 001-3301-4201 4,897.93 001-3304-4201 1,675.33 001-6101-4201 2,926.55 Total : 21,571.63 2Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74249 7/3/2014 18349 BARRAGAN, NANETTE 04299 Travel Exp Reimb/ TR 361 001-1101-4317 212.00 Total : 212.00 74250 7/3/2014 18583 BARROWS, KRISTIN 4601-04272 Instructor Pymt 6/20 to 6/27/14 001-4601-4221 497.00 Total : 497.00 74251 7/3/2014 17271 BARROWS, PATRICK 04080 Instructor Pymt# 19541,42, 19553-58, 001-4601-4221 3,250.10 Total : 3,250.10 74252 7/3/2014 16371 BEACH GIRL PROPERTIES LLC 129 Parking Meters - 70 14th Street/June 001-3842 650.00 130 Parking Meters - 70 14th Street/July 001-3842 650.00 Total : 1,300.00 74253 7/3/2014 06409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS 243423 R1`Asphalt Purchase / April '14 001-3104-4309 268.98 Total : 268.98 74254 7/3/2014 03190 BLUEPRINT SERVICE AND SUPPLY 190124 CIP Copies/ 12-153 001-8153-4201 150.42 Total : 150.42 74255 7/3/2014 08482 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 81443013 Gloves - PD 001-2101-4306 569.36 Total : 569.36 74256 7/3/2014 00163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 1170863 Prisoner Laundry/May '14 001-2101-4306 70.78 1172292 Prisoner Laundry/May '14 001-2101-4306 105.31 1173758 Prisoner Laundry/May '14 001-2101-4306 59.93 3Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74256 7/3/2014 (Continued)00163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 1175219 Prisoner Laundry/May '14 001-2101-4306 96.05 Total : 332.07 74257 7/3/2014 00034 BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORP 297200 Notice to Appear Citation Signs 001-2101-4305 1,786.56 Total : 1,786.56 74258 7/3/2014 00016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 4286211111 Water Usage - May '14 001-6101-4303 17,463.24 001-4204-4303 984.76 001-3304-4303 188.22 105-2601-4303 2,753.47 Total : 21,389.69 74259 7/3/2014 18585 CASADY, BRADEN 4601-04269 Instructor Pymt/ 6/20 - 6/27/14 001-4601-4221 370.00 Total : 370.00 74260 7/3/2014 09632 CDWG JW46675 Returned Video Card Dual Monitor 715-1206-5401 -321.93 KP97751 NIKON DIGITAL CAMERA 715-2101-5401 142.33 KR67273 Nikon Digital Camera 715-2101-5401 524.29 LT46438 & LV25245 Sonicwall TZ 715-1206-5401 835.00 001-4601-4201 331.95 MH90142 Toner / June 14 715-1206-4305 72.68 MJ32600 Toner / June 14 715-1206-4305 606.57 Total : 2,190.89 74261 7/3/2014 05970 COLLINS, DENNIS 4601-04148 Instructor Pymt #19646/19647/19649/~ 001-4601-4221 2,968.00 4Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 2,968.00 74261 7/3/2014 05970 COLLINS, DENNIS 74262 7/3/2014 18070 COME LAND MAINTENANCE CO INC 2639 JANITORIAL SERVICES/ MAY 14 001-4204-4201 8,385.00 Total : 8,385.00 74263 7/3/2014 15813 CORPUS, FRANCESCA 4601-04271 Instructor Pymt 6/20 - 6/27/14 001-4601-4221 360.00 Total : 360.00 74264 7/3/2014 00879 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PW-14040707993 Artesia Blvd. Maintenance/March '14 001-3104-4251 108.68 PW-14051208922 ARTESIA BLVD MAINTENANCE/APRIL'14 001-3104-4251 146.88 PW-14060909708 Artesia Blvd Maintenance/May '14 001-3104-4251 320.49 Total : 576.05 74265 7/3/2014 00480 CPCA, CA POLICE CHIEFS ASSOC 35 FY 14/15 Membership Dues 001-2101-4315 630.00 Total : 630.00 74266 7/3/2014 07700 CPRS 113772 Membership/ K. Orta 001-4601-4315 150.00 118249 Membership/ L. Nichols 001-4601-4315 145.00 Total : 295.00 74267 7/3/2014 18573 CRICKET VENTURES 2990717 Two way Radios 001-4601-4308 969.92 Total : 969.92 74268 7/3/2014 08855 D AND D SERVICES INC 77282 Dead Animal Disposal/ May 14 001-3302-4201 319.00 Total : 319.00 74269 7/3/2014 18582 DAVIS, NICOLE 4601-04268 Instructor Pymt - 6/20 - 6/27/14 001-4601-4221 390.00 5Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 390.00 74269 7/3/2014 18582 DAVIS, NICOLE 74270 7/3/2014 14171 DAVOODIAN, MICHAEL 110660 Business Cards 001-1208-4305 256.33 Total : 256.33 74271 7/3/2014 12991 DELL MARKETING LP XJF3F9161 600GB Harddrive 001-2101-4305 348.79 Total : 348.79 74272 7/3/2014 18576 DESAI, AMI 164846 Refund Cash Key# 164846 001-2117 21.00 Total : 21.00 74273 7/3/2014 11449 DEWEY PEST CONTROL 8625277 PEST CONTROL SERVICES/ JUN 14 001-4204-4201 601.00 Total : 601.00 74274 7/3/2014 18589 DIGITAL EMS SOLUTIONS INC 00028 Electronic Patient Care System Software 001-2201-5405 9,700.00 Total : 9,700.00 74275 7/3/2014 14567 DOGS BEST FRIEND 04122 Instructor Pymt/ # 19625, 631 001-4601-4221 336.00 Total : 336.00 74276 7/3/2014 12735 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC 49930 Range Equipment & Supplies/April '14 001-2101-4201 2,424.60 49969 Range Equipment & Supplies/May '14 001-2101-4201 2,440.80 Total : 4,865.40 74277 7/3/2014 00181 EASY READER ER140508010 PCH/Aviation Beautification 001-8143-4201 805.00 Total : 805.00 74278 7/3/2014 00193 EMBLEM ENTERPRISES 350059 Cloth Badges Returned - PD 001-2101-4314 -130.47 6Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74278 7/3/2014 (Continued)00193 EMBLEM ENTERPRISES 578832 Patches / PD 001-2101-4314 56.30 584904 Cloth Badges - PSO's 001-2101-4314 281.50 Total : 207.33 74279 7/3/2014 18584 EMHOF, WILLIAM J 4601-04270 Instructor Pymt 6/20 - 6/27/14 001-4601-4221 294.00 Total : 294.00 74280 7/3/2014 13075 ESRI 25625523 ArcGIS & View Maint Agreement-FY14/15 715-1206-4201 6,688.00 Total : 6,688.00 74281 7/3/2014 10668 EXXON MOBIL FLEET GECC 369-952-669-9 Gas Card Purchases/5/11 to 6/10/14 715-2101-4310 6,764.25 715-2201-4310 209.90 715-4201-4310 33.33 715-4202-4310 171.03 715-6101-4310 575.38 715-3302-4310 2,716.81 715-3104-4310 518.77 715-4601-4310 172.60 715-2601-4310 583.11 001-1250 140.22 Total : 11,885.40 74282 7/3/2014 16932 FAMILY THEATRE INC 04125 Instructor Pymt/ # 19504, 505 001-4601-4221 812.00 4601-04241 Instructor Pymt # 19858/19857/19856 001-4601-4221 3,136.00 Total : 3,948.00 74283 7/3/2014 06344 FIRST CALL STAFFING SERVICES 0709-143039 Temp Services/ Week ending 6-1-14 001-4601-4201 684.00 7Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74283 7/3/2014 (Continued)06344 FIRST CALL STAFFING SERVICES 0709-143297 Temp Services/ Week ending 6-15-14 001-4601-4201 889.20 0709-143420 Temp Services/Week Ending 6/22/14 001-4601-4201 912.00 Total : 2,485.20 74284 7/3/2014 15573 FONTIS SOLUTIONS 184608 Event/Guest Parking Passes/May'14 001-1204-4305 585.35 Total : 585.35 74285 7/3/2014 05125 GHASSEMI PETTY CASH, MARIA 1141-04285 Petty Cash Replenishment 001-1201-4315 35.00 001-1203-4201 39.28 001-1203-4300 115.10 001-2101-4314 36.80 001-2101-4317 73.28 001-4101-4305 132.51 001-4101-4317 125.00 001-4202-4317 25.00 001-4601-4328 205.77 170-2105-4201 66.70 170-2105-5401 57.75 170-2105-4201 25.00 Total : 937.19 74286 7/3/2014 00387 HANSON AGGREGATES INC 1463439 Crushed Aggregate Base 001-3104-4309 623.00 Total : 623.00 74287 7/3/2014 03131 HDL COREN AND CONE 0020298-IN PROPERTY TAX AUDIT SERVICES/ 4TH QTR 001-1202-4201 1,375.00 Total : 1,375.00 74288 7/3/2014 15810 HENNIS, LEE A 04199 2013 Assessment Tax Rebate 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 8Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74289 7/3/2014 07547 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSC 0022325-IN Sales Tax Audit Services/ 4th Qtr 001-1202-4201 900.00 0022325-INa Audit Services - Sales Tax 001-1202-4201 613.83 Total : 1,513.83 74290 7/3/2014 03432 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 473328 Hardware Supplies - June '14 001-3104-4309 48.23 888042 Hardware Supplies - June '14 001-3104-4309 74.71 Total : 122.94 74291 7/3/2014 14056 HOPKINS, TRACY 04152 HBNW Exp Reimb 001-2101-4201 443.98 Total : 443.98 74292 7/3/2014 09130 HRBOKA, DENNIS 04124 Instructor Pymt/ # 19666 001-4601-4221 1,050.00 Total : 1,050.00 74293 7/3/2014 10909 HUB INTERNATIONAL 04066 Tulip Insurance/ May 14 001-3897 166.30 Total : 166.30 74294 7/3/2014 18196 HUDSON MOTORCYCLES 2255 Repair Electrical Switches 715-2101-4311 435.61 2288 Repairs for Honda # 4 715-2101-4311 1,324.21 Total : 1,759.82 74295 7/3/2014 16793 HUNTINGTON BEACH MOTORSPORTS 78638 Repairs on 2011 Honda 715-2101-4311 1,061.12 Total : 1,061.12 74296 7/3/2014 16742 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 000413389 Office Supplies/April '14 001-4201-4305 59.84 Total : 59.84 9Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74297 7/3/2014 18289 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SUPPLY 1004210 Air Canisters for Face Masks 001-2101-4350 3,375.57 Total : 3,375.57 74298 7/3/2014 02458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 244656-00 Electrical Supplies - Mar 14 105-2601-4309 179.85 245227-00 Electrical Supplies - Apr 14 105-2601-4309 347.34 245609-00 Electrical Supplies - Jun 14 105-2601-4309 467.75 001-2021 8.50 001-2022 -8.50 245611-00 Electrical Supplies - Jun 14 105-2601-4309 470.96 001-2021 8.56 001-2022 -8.56 245620-00 Electrical Supplies - Jun 14 105-2601-4309 88.81 001-2022 -1.66 001-2021 1.66 245622-00 Electrical Supplies - Jun 14 105-2601-4309 99.51 001-2021 0.00 245740-00 Electrical Supplies - Jun 14 105-2601-4309 490.61 001-2021 9.17 001-2022 -9.17 Total : 2,144.83 74299 7/3/2014 18574 INSPECTOR TOOLS 136313 Gas Detection Tool Calibration Kit 001-2201-5401 644.76 136314 Gas Detection Tool - FD 001-2201-5402 2,189.81 Total : 2,834.57 74300 7/3/2014 17441 INTELLIBRIDGE PARTNERS LLC 195309 Temp Services - April '14 001-1202-4201 8,690.00 10Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74300 7/3/2014 (Continued)17441 INTELLIBRIDGE PARTNERS LLC 198087 Temp Services - June '14 001-1202-4201 6,902.50 Total : 15,592.50 74301 7/3/2014 17474 INTERNATIONAL SECURITY PRODUCT 8332 Paper for Business License Certificates 001-1204-4305 344.88 Total : 344.88 74302 7/3/2014 09139 IRON MOUNTAIN KGV7026 Off Site Storage/May '14 001-1121-4201 464.36 KJL7712 Off Site Storage/June '14 001-1121-4201 472.17 Total : 936.53 74303 7/3/2014 12151 JAHNG, CHRISTOPHER Y 04121 Instructor Pymt/ # 20013 001-4601-4221 2,100.00 Total : 2,100.00 74304 7/3/2014 10820 JENKINS AND HOGIN LLP 22551 Legal, RE: General Services/ May 14 001-1131-4201 16,250.30 22552 Legal, RE: E & B Oil/ May 14 001-2109 15,367.29 22553 Legal, RE: Land Use/ May 14 001-1131-4201 1,009.80 22554 Legal, RE: Prosecution Services/ May 14 001-1132-4201 30,913.86 Total : 63,541.25 74305 7/3/2014 10334 JENSEN, GLENN 4601-04263 Instructor Pymt/6/20 - 6/27/14 001-4601-4221 2,200.00 Total : 2,200.00 74306 7/3/2014 01165 JOBS AVAILABLE 1413018 Employment Ads - June '14 001-1203-4201 565.50 Total : 565.50 11Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74307 7/3/2014 00354 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 68021912 Landscping Supplies - May '14 001-6101-4309 56.68 Total : 56.68 74308 7/3/2014 13840 JOHN M CRUIKSHANK 12512 ENGINEERING SER - PIER REPAIRS/ MAY 14 122-8659-4201 417.00 Total : 417.00 74309 7/3/2014 12162 JOL DESIGN 14607 Revised Chevron Surf Camp Shirts 001-4601-4308 9,132.57 Total : 9,132.57 74310 7/3/2014 18581 KIDDE SAFETY 14003842 Lock Boxes 001-2113 465.43 Total : 465.43 74311 7/3/2014 12964 LA CO DEPT OF HEALTH Firm # 2917 Annual Back Flow Device Admin Fee 001-6101-4251 170.00 Total : 170.00 74312 7/3/2014 15782 LA CO METRO TRANSPORTATION 800058073 TAPS Bus Pass Sales/February '14 145-3403-4251 254.00 800058263 TAPS Bus Pass Sales/March '14 145-3403-4251 148.00 800058442 TAPS Bus Pass Sales/ April '14 145-3403-4251 190.00 800058686 TAPS Bus Pass Sales/ May '14 145-3403-4251 218.00 Total : 810.00 74313 7/3/2014 15574 LANDPORT SYSTEMS INC 2014-7157 Service Request System Support/May 715-1206-4201 195.00 2014-7395 Service Request System Support/June 715-1206-4201 195.00 Total : 390.00 74314 7/3/2014 12190 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC INV-004488 Repair Parts for Playground Equipment 12Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 13 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74314 7/3/2014 (Continued)12190 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC 001-6101-4309 1,145.97 Total : 1,145.97 74315 7/3/2014 04186 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES 100613 Contribution/ Local Streets & Roads 001-1101-4315 200.00 Total : 200.00 74316 7/3/2014 00167 LEARNED LUMBER B397281 Hardware Supplies/ Apr 14 001-6101-4309 61.77 B401155 Hardware Supplies/ May 14 001-3104-4309 26.68 B401587 Hardware Supplies/ May 14 001-4204-4309 71.87 B402226 Hardware Supplies/ May 14 001-4204-4309 23.54 B404654 Lumber Supplies/ May 14 001-4204-4309 52.28 B405173 Lumber Supplies/ May 14 001-4204-4309 83.06 B406975 Rebar 001-3104-4309 118.04 B407098 Lumber Supplies/ Jun 14 001-3104-4309 14.19 B407144 Lumber Supplies/ Jun 14 001-4204-4309 53.51 B408104 Lumber for Training Props - FD 001-2201-5401 950.73 Total : 1,455.67 74317 7/3/2014 12482 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT INC 1114400-20140531 Information Services/May '14 001-2101-4201 50.00 Total : 50.00 74318 7/3/2014 17862 LIFELOC TECHNOLOGIES INC 14-HE90254 Breathalyzer Supplies/June '14 001-2101-4309 332.71 13Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 14 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 332.71 74318 7/3/2014 17862 LIFELOC TECHNOLOGIES INC 74319 7/3/2014 11817 LINNELL, RICHARD 4601-04147 Instructor Pymt #19579/19852/19583/~ 001-4601-4221 1,575.00 Total : 1,575.00 74320 7/3/2014 14111 LONNQUIST, GEORGIA 2101-04265 Reimb Travel Exp # 202 001-2101-4317 138.08 Total : 138.08 74321 7/3/2014 18578 LORD, RICHARD 04130 Cash Key Deposit Refund/ # 214115 001-2117 21.00 Total : 21.00 74322 7/3/2014 10873 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CLERK 4101-04240 Environmental Impact Report 001-2109 3,104.75 Total : 3,104.75 74323 7/3/2014 00777 M AND K METAL CO 376-6984 Steel Plate - April '14 001-4204-4309 231.47 Total : 231.47 74324 7/3/2014 18274 MAGNUM VENTURE PARTNERS 04123 Instructor Pymt/ # 19661 001-4601-4221 224.00 Total : 224.00 74325 7/3/2014 00289 MARTIN AND CHAPMAN CO 2014163 Election Consultant & Supplies 001-1121-4201 508.00 Total : 508.00 74326 7/3/2014 17717 MC MAHON, VERONICA 253931 Camp Refund 001-2111 145.00 Total : 145.00 74327 7/3/2014 18568 MEENAN, JOHN C 122-04226 2013 Assessment Tax Rebate 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 14Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 15 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74328 7/3/2014 16541 MIDCITY MAILING SERVICES CORP 20626 PRINTING LETTERS & ENVELOPES 001-1101-4319 2,050.00 Total : 2,050.00 74329 7/3/2014 09043 MILLER, DONALD 04198 2013 Assessment Tax Rebate 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 74330 7/3/2014 16931 MOVIES BY KIDS 4601-04243 Instructor Pymt # 19779 001-4601-4221 1,365.00 Total : 1,365.00 74331 7/3/2014 18591 NEIMARK, MICHAEL 04208 Cash Key Deposit Refund/ # 3207632 001-2117 21.00 Total : 21.00 74332 7/3/2014 18592 NEWMAN, BOBBI 04207 Cash Key Dep & Bal Refund/ # 165403 001-2117 21.00 001-3851 66.75 Total : 87.75 74333 7/3/2014 18567 NOBLE, BECKY 253528 Class Refund 001-2111 100.00 Total : 100.00 74334 7/3/2014 13114 OFFICE DEPOT 696432579001 OFFICE SUPPLIES CREDIT 001-1203-4305 -24.41 698458540001 OFFICE SUPPLIES CREDIT 001-4202-4305 -12.84 700346284001 Office Supplies/Feb '14 001-4601-4305 10.67 707025070001 Office Supplies/Apr '14 001-4601-4305 14.70 707025736001 Office Supplies/Apr '14 001-4601-4305 65.42 712607824001 Office Supplies/ June '14 001-4101-4305 18.72 15Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 16 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74334 7/3/2014 (Continued)13114 OFFICE DEPOT 712928613001 Office Supplies/ June '14 001-1208-4305 35.10 715-1206-4305 29.95 714696675001 Office Supplies/ May 14 001-4601-4305 83.97 714696821001 Office Supplies/May '14 001-4601-4305 14.32 715384573001 Office Supplies/ June '14 001-1208-4305 85.86 715414970001 Office Supplies/Jun '14 001-1203-4305 67.32 715680581001 Office Supplies/June '14 001-4601-4305 86.03 715680680001 Office Supplies/June '14 001-4601-4305 6.32 715814290001 Office Supplies/ June '14 001-4601-4305 94.67 715965028001 Office Supplies/ June '14 001-4601-4305 99.03 716762599001 Office Supplies/June '14 001-1203-4305 92.85 716775647001 Office Supplies/ June '14 001-1202-4305 93.57 Total : 861.25 74335 7/3/2014 18580 OGS TECHNOLOGIES INC 188307 Nickel Buttons for Police Uniforms 001-2101-4314 207.07 188789 Class A Uniform Buttons - PD 001-2101-4314 320.72 Total : 527.79 74336 7/3/2014 18588 PACIFIC COAST ENTERTAINMENT 14-1269 Lights for Community Theatre 001-4601-4201 3,734.36 Total : 3,734.36 16Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 17 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74337 7/3/2014 13053 PACIFIC UTILITY PRODUCTS E-11131 Utility Box/ Lot A 001-8651-4201 2,485.86 Total : 2,485.86 74338 7/3/2014 16138 PAPER PLUS 6250043895 NCR Paper 001-4202-4305 160.29 6250044112 NCR Paper 001-4202-4305 131.85 Total : 292.14 74339 7/3/2014 14693 PARS PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT, US BANK29006 PARS/ARS Admin - 6746022400/ Apr 14 001-1101-4185 5.71 001-1202-4185 50.05 001-1204-4185 38.62 001-2201-4185 69.53 001-3302-4185 4.55 001-4101-4185 23.80 001-4201-4185 20.82 001-4601-4185 86.92 Total : 300.00 74340 7/3/2014 17096 PCR SERVICES CORPORATION 14-1289 Historical Rprt-1221 Hermosa Ave/ Mar 14 001-4101-4201 167.00 Total : 167.00 74341 7/3/2014 17972 PENCO ENGINEERNG INC 0018285 Consult - Sewer Service Charge Study 301-8401-4201 4,755.00 Total : 4,755.00 74342 7/3/2014 01911 PROVIDENCE MEDICAL INSTITUTE 600000285 Pre-employment Exams/ Feb - Apr 14 001-1203-4320 4,263.00 Total : 4,263.00 74343 7/3/2014 17676 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 40780895 Mats Rental / April '14 001-2201-4309 27.18 40780896 Mats Rental / April '14 001-4204-4309 46.28 17Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 18 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74343 7/3/2014 (Continued)17676 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 40780897 Mats Rental / April '14 001-3302-4309 26.78 40780898 Mats Rental / April '14 001-4204-4309 33.68 40780901 Mats Rental / April '14 001-2101-4309 33.08 40780902 Mats Rental / April '14 001-3104-4309 24.18 40794537 Mats Rental / May '14 001-2201-4309 27.18 40794538 Mats Rental / May '14 001-4204-4309 46.28 40794539 Mats Rental / May '14 001-3302-4309 26.78 40794540 Mats Rental / May '14 001-4204-4309 33.68 40794541 Mats Rental / May '14 715-4206-4309 19.68 40794543 Mats Rental / May '14 001-2101-4309 33.08 40794544 Mats Rental / May '14 001-3104-4309 24.18 40797038 Uniform Rental - May '14 001-4202-4314 40.25 40799375 Mats Rental / June '14 001-2201-4309 27.18 40799377 Mats Rented / June '14 001-3302-4309 26.78 40799378 Mats Rented / June '14 001-4204-4309 33.68 40799379 Mats Rental / June '14 715-4206-4309 19.68 40799380 Mats Rental / June '14 001-4202-4314 40.06 18Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 19 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74343 7/3/2014 (Continued)17676 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 40799381 Mats Rental / June '14 001-2101-4309 33.08 40799382 Mats Rented / June '14 001-3104-4309 24.18 407996376 Mats Rental / June '14 001-4204-4309 46.28 Total : 693.21 74344 7/3/2014 08364 PVP COMMUNICATIONS INC 19281 2 Helmet Communication Kits 715-2101-4311 2,483.64 Total : 2,483.64 74345 7/3/2014 08768 QUADRANT SYSTEMS 140609 Paper Rolls for Cash Register 001-1204-4305 296.00 Total : 296.00 74346 7/3/2014 10697 QUALITY FENCE CO INC 44089 Privacy Fencing/ Lot A Trash Compactor 001-8651-4201 1,900.00 Total : 1,900.00 74347 7/3/2014 08837 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF 20518 Diesel Fuel Purchases/ Feb 14 715-2201-4310 861.46 715-3102-4310 448.91 20651 Diesel Fuel Purchases/ Mar 14 715-2201-4310 1,193.55 Total : 2,503.92 74348 7/3/2014 18579 ROBISON, GREER 200090890 Refund Cit # 200090890 001-3302 28.00 Total : 28.00 74349 7/3/2014 12788 RON TURLEY ASSOCIATES 41893 Annual Maintenance Agreement FY14/15 715-4206-4201 654.50 Total : 654.50 74350 7/3/2014 16921 ROUND STAR WEST LLC 4601-04242 Instructor Pymt # 19897 19Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 20 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74350 7/3/2014 (Continued)16921 ROUND STAR WEST LLC 001-4601-4221 420.00 Total : 420.00 74351 7/3/2014 09870 RYDIN DECAL 29447 Parking Decals & Permits/May '14 001-1204-4305 797.00 294482 Monthly Parking Permits 001-1204-4305 1,438.77 Total : 2,235.77 74352 7/3/2014 09402 S AND S WORLDWIDE INC 7133439 Summercamp Supplies 001-4601-4308 92.64 8127055 Summercamp Supplies 001-4601-4308 776.80 8142499 Summercamp Supplies 001-4601-4308 112.22 Total : 981.66 74353 7/3/2014 03428 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION CI28914 Latex Paint Purchase / June '14 001-3104-4309 707.94 Total : 707.94 74354 7/3/2014 12778 SAIKLEY, J PARKER 001 Relocate Volleyball Courts/ 8th Street 001-6101-4201 400.00 Total : 400.00 74355 7/3/2014 08165 SASE COMPANY INC INV130242 Grinder Parts 001-3104-4309 1,042.29 Total : 1,042.29 74356 7/3/2014 18587 SASON CABANBAN, ANGELICA ARIELLE4601-04264 Instructor Pymt 6/20 - 6/27/14 001-4601-4221 240.00 Total : 240.00 74357 7/3/2014 18586 SASON CABANBAN, ANGELO GABRIEL 4601-04267 Instructor Pymt 6/20 to 6/27/14 001-4601-4221 594.00 Total : 594.00 20Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 21 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74358 7/3/2014 00839 SAXE CLIFFORD PH D, SUSAN 14-0612-2 Pre-employment Exam/June '14 001-2101-4201 450.00 Total : 450.00 74359 7/3/2014 18590 SCHNEIDER, ROCHELLE 04217 Cash Key Deposit & Bal Refund/ # 154652 001-2117 16.50 001-3851 15.75 Total : 32.25 74360 7/3/2014 17903 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 6701-6 Paint Purchase - May '14 001-4204-4309 340.28 6897-2 Paint Purchase - May '14 001-4204-4309 98.17 Total : 438.45 74361 7/3/2014 08510 SOUTH COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 1616 LED Headlights for New Fire Engine 001-2201-5401 3,940.35 001-2201-5402 2,489.56 Total : 6,429.91 74362 7/3/2014 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 2-00-989-6911 Electrical Billing - June '14 105-2601-4303 135.32 2-01-414-3747 Electrical Billing - June '14 105-2601-4303 52.88 2-01-414-3994 Electrical Billing - June '14 160-3102-4303 78.96 2-01-414-4281 Electrical Billing - June '14 105-2601-4303 403.33 2-01-836-7458 Electrical Billing - June '14 105-2601-4303 18.64 2-02-274-0542 Electrical Billing - June '14 001-6101-4303 28.59 2-09-076-5850 Electrical Billing - June '14 105-2601-4303 207.87 2-19-024-1604 Electrical Billing - June '14 001-4204-4303 2,611.20 21Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 22 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74362 7/3/2014 (Continued)00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 2-20-984-6179 Electrical Billing - June '14 105-2601-4303 29.84 2-21-400-7684 Electrical Billing - June '14 105-2601-4303 36.19 2-21-964-8003 Electrical Billing - June '14 105-2601-4303 23.79 2-22-267-0663 Electrical Billing - June '14 001-3301-4303 21.41 2-23-687-8021 Electrical Billing - June '14 001-3104-4303 70.51 2-26-686-5930 Electrical Billing - June '14 105-2601-4303 458.81 2-29-332-0750 Electrical Billing - June '14 105-2601-4303 58.98 2-33-095-1989 Electrical Billing - June '14 105-2601-4303 24.87 Total : 4,261.19 74363 7/3/2014 00146 SPARKLETTS 4472888052914 Drinking Water - May '14 001-4601-4305 88.39 Total : 88.39 74364 7/3/2014 10098 SPRINT NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 269424317-150 Wireless Modems - PD/ May 14 153-2106-4201 385.00 371554311-151 Cell Phone Usage - FD/ May 14 001-2201-4304 293.88 397572146-094 Cell Phone Usage - CD/ May 14 001-4201-4304 95.88 551834312-150 Cell Phone Usage - CR/ May 14 001-4601-4304 89.31 Total : 864.07 74365 7/3/2014 09099 STEWART JACKSON SPRINKLERS, IN 52909 Annual Backflow Device Tests 001-6101-4201 1,320.00 Total : 1,320.00 22Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 23 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74366 7/3/2014 16667 TARGETSAFETYCOM INC 16346 FY 14/15 License & Subscription Renewals 001-2201-4317 3,270.00 Total : 3,270.00 74367 7/3/2014 00841 TORRANCE POLICE DEPT.2101-04013 Driver Training Update 001-2101-4317 800.00 Total : 800.00 74368 7/3/2014 11102 TORRANCE WHOLESALE NURSERY 109046 Landscape Materials/June '14 001-6101-4201 321.55 109051 Landscape Materials/ Jun 14 105-2601-4201 984.88 109066 Landscape Materials/June '14 001-6101-4309 490.50 109067 Landscape Materials/June '14 001-6101-4309 490.50 109068 Landscape Materials/June '14 001-6101-4309 490.50 109069 Landscape Materials/June '14 105-2601-4309 80.66 Total : 2,858.59 74369 7/3/2014 08207 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 120140308 Underground Service Alert-January '14 160-3102-4201 57.00 320140314 Underground Service Alert/March '14 160-3102-4201 61.50 420140315 Underground Service Alert/April '14 160-3102-4201 61.50 520140313 Underground Service Alert/May '14 160-3102-4201 130.50 Total : 310.50 74370 7/3/2014 18389 UNIFORM DEPOT INC 508 Uniforms/ G Campos 001-3302-4314 289.98 Total : 289.98 74371 7/3/2014 14528 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, PARS #674601920061417a PARS/OPEB Contributions - Mar 14 23Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 24 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74371 7/3/2014 (Continued)14528 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, PARS #6746019200 001-1101-4190 220.00 001-1121-4190 1,059.00 001-1141-4190 277.00 001-1201-4190 228.00 001-1202-4190 3,341.00 001-1203-4190 990.00 001-1204-4190 2,646.00 001-1208-4190 456.00 001-2101-4190 34,269.00 001-2201-4190 9,887.00 001-3104-4190 2,582.00 001-3301-4190 238.00 001-3302-4190 7,503.00 001-4101-4190 2,609.00 001-4201-4190 2,661.00 001-4202-4190 2,181.00 001-4204-4190 1,208.00 001-4601-4190 1,785.00 001-6101-4190 1,044.00 105-2601-4190 705.00 160-3102-4190 1,199.00 715-4206-4190 1,108.00 24Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 25 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74371 7/3/2014 (Continued)14528 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, PARS #6746019200 61417b PARS/OPEB Contributions - Apr 14 001-1101-4190 220.00 001-1121-4190 1,059.00 001-1141-4190 277.00 001-1201-4190 228.00 001-1202-4190 3,341.00 001-1203-4190 990.00 001-1204-4190 2,646.00 001-1208-4190 456.00 001-2101-4190 34,269.00 001-2201-4190 9,887.00 001-3104-4190 2,582.00 001-3301-4190 238.00 001-3302-4190 7,503.00 001-4101-4190 2,609.00 001-4201-4190 2,661.00 001-4202-4190 2,181.00 001-4204-4190 1,208.00 001-4601-4190 1,785.00 001-6101-4190 1,044.00 105-2601-4190 705.00 160-3102-4190 1,199.00 715-4206-4190 1,108.00 25Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 26 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74371 7/3/2014 (Continued)14528 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, PARS #6746019200 61417c PARS/OPEB Contributions - May 14 001-1101-4190 220.00 001-1121-4190 1,059.00 001-1141-4190 277.00 001-1201-4190 228.00 001-1202-4190 3,341.00 001-1203-4190 990.00 001-1204-4190 2,646.00 001-1208-4190 456.00 001-2101-4190 34,269.00 001-2201-4190 9,887.00 001-3104-4190 2,582.00 001-3301-4190 238.00 001-3302-4190 7,503.00 001-4101-4190 2,609.00 001-4201-4190 2,661.00 001-4202-4190 2,181.00 001-4204-4190 1,208.00 001-4601-4190 1,785.00 001-6101-4190 1,044.00 105-2601-4190 705.00 160-3102-4190 1,199.00 715-4206-4190 1,108.00 26Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 27 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74371 7/3/2014 (Continued)14528 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, PARS #6746019200 61714 PARS/OPEB Contributions - Feb 14 001-1101-4190 220.00 001-1121-4190 1,059.00 001-1141-4190 277.00 001-1201-4190 228.00 001-1202-4190 3,341.00 001-1203-4190 990.00 001-1204-4190 2,646.00 001-1208-4190 456.00 001-2101-4190 34,269.00 001-2201-4190 9,887.00 001-3104-4190 2,582.00 001-3301-4190 238.00 001-3302-4190 7,503.00 001-4101-4190 2,609.00 001-4201-4190 2,661.00 001-4202-4190 2,181.00 001-4204-4190 1,208.00 001-4601-4190 1,785.00 001-6101-4190 1,044.00 105-2601-4190 705.00 160-3102-4190 1,199.00 715-4206-4190 1,108.00 Total : 312,784.00 74372 7/3/2014 14148 UPS 1Z23R1460391233267 Express Mail/6/05/14 001-2101-4305 15.85 Total : 15.85 74373 7/3/2014 04768 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE 23720 Printer Maintenance 715-1206-4201 704.60 23756 Printer Maintenance/FY 14-15 715-1206-4201 704.60 Total : 1,409.20 74374 7/3/2014 09672 VCA COAST ANIMAL HOSPITAL 27548887 CARDBOARD ANIMAL CARRIERS 27Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 28 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74374 7/3/2014 (Continued)09672 VCA COAST ANIMAL HOSPITAL 001-3302-5401 111.76 Total : 111.76 74375 7/3/2014 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 310 318-8751 090128 TAPS Line/ May 14 001-1204-4304 113.50 310 372-6373 040311 Personnel Fax Line/ Jun 14 001-1204-4304 47.45 310 PL0-0346 Phone Charges/Circuit Billing/June 001-2101-4304 50.56 310 RT0-0181 Phone Charges/Circuit Billin/June 001-2101-4304 65.95 310-167-1756 Phone Charges/Circuit Billing/June 001-2101-4304 329.72 28Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 29 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74375 7/3/2014 (Continued)00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 310-318-6379 Phone Charges / 4/25 - 5/25/14 001-1121-4304 5.08 001-1132-4304 2.69 001-1141-4304 1.30 001-2101-4304 124.52 001-2201-4304 73.42 001-4101-4304 11.15 001-4201-4304 18.85 001-4202-4304 58.57 001-4601-4304 28.61 001-1204-4304 17.49 001-3302-4304 1.78 715-1206-4304 5.56 001-1201-4304 3.91 001-1202-4304 16.49 001-1203-4304 16.75 001-1208-4304 0.66 001-2101-4304 126.48 001-2201-4304 74.58 001-4101-4304 11.33 001-4201-4304 19.14 001-4202-4304 59.48 001-4601-4304 29.05 001-1204-4304 17.76 001-3302-4304 1.80 715-1206-4304 5.64 001-1121-4304 5.01 001-1132-4304 2.65 001-1141-4304 1.28 001-1201-4304 3.85 001-1202-4304 16.23 001-1203-4304 16.50 001-1208-4304 0.65 310-406-2462 Phone Charges / Circuit Billing/June 001-2101-4304 52.59 29Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 30 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,438.03 74375 7/3/2014 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 74376 7/3/2014 09056 VERIZON ONLINE 1160742236 Fiber Optic Line - June '14 715-1206-4201 170.00 Total : 170.00 74377 7/3/2014 11219 WESTCHESTER MEDICAL GROUP CH026-6779 Annual Physicals/J. De Los Santos 001-1203-4320 500.00 Total : 500.00 74378 7/3/2014 02873 WESTERN GRAPHIX 43198 ID Cards 001-1203-4305 134.32 Total : 134.32 74379 7/3/2014 14008 YORK SCRMA 070114 W/Comp Claims - 6/27/14 705-1217-4324 13,605.18 Total : 13,605.18 74380 7/3/2014 15142 ZOLL DATA SYSTEMS 9013583 Fire System Maintenance for FY 14/15 715-1206-4201 630.00 Total : 630.00 74381 7/3/2014 01206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 0151696 Street Sign Maint Material/March '13 001-3104-4309 720.21 0152236 Street Sign Maint Material/May '14 001-3104-4309 136.25 0152927 Street Sign Maint Material/June '14 001-3104-4309 848.77 0153148 Street Sign Maint Material/June '14 001-3104-4309 894.42 0153149 Street Sign Maint Material/June '14 001-3104-4309 388.48 Total : 2,988.13 457111 6/25/2014 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO 01100457009 Gas Bill/ 5-9 to 6-10-14 001-4204-4303 63.40 Total : 63.40 30Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 31 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 461169 6/25/2014 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO 11540469001 Gas Bill/ 5-8 to 6-9-14 001-4204-4303 34.62 Total : 34.62 462055 6/25/2014 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO 13910446007 Gas Bill/ 5-9 to 6-10-14 001-4204-4303 19.11 Total : 19.11 462145 6/25/2014 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO 14120446001 Gas Bill/ 5-9 to 6-10-14 001-4204-4303 37.92 Total : 37.92 495444 6/30/2014 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO 09790459003 Gas Bill/ 5-9 to 6-10-14 001-4204-4303 123.19 Total : 123.19 495488 6/30/2014 00170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO 10210459003 Gas Bill/ 5-9 to 6-10-14 001-4204-4303 43.46 Total : 43.46 7032014 7/3/2014 00243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 06302014 PAYROLL 6/16/14 TO 6/30/14 001-1103 702,489.24 105-1103 5,272.78 115-1103 2,675.04 117-1103 2,472.67 125-1103 668.73 145-1103 95.58 147-1103 891.70 150-1103 222.91 152-1103 85.49 160-1103 8,184.77 705-1103 3,780.68 715-1103 8,280.66 Total : 735,120.25 Bank total : 1,397,776.49 152 Vouchers for bank code :boa 1,397,776.49Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 152 31Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 32 6:34:57PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 32 inclusive, of the check register for 7-3-14 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 7-14-14 32Page: 07/03/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 7:06:29PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74382 7/3/2014 04800 RAY, JAY VINCENT 04244 Instructor Pymt/ Surf Camp 6/20 & 6/27 001-4601-4221 104.80 Total : 104.80 Bank total : 104.80 1 Vouchers for bank code :boa 104.80Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 1 "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 1 inclusive, of the check register for 7-3-14 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 7-14-14 1Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74383 7/10/2014 17588 A AND A READY MIXED 2072026 Concrete Purchase - Jun '14 001-3104-4309 483.96 Total : 483.96 74384 7/10/2014 11437 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CO OP 318380 TAXI VOUCHER PROGRAM - MAY 14 145-3404-4201 5,256.64 Total : 5,256.64 74385 7/10/2014 06827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 35612 CROSSING GUARD SERVICE/5-25 TO 6-7-14 001-2102-4201 4,311.45 35746 CROSSING GUARD SERVICE/6-8 TO 6-21-14 001-2102-4201 4,761.02 Total : 9,072.47 74386 7/10/2014 15521 AMERICAN TRAFFIC 03874 Citation Refund/ # 200100609 001-3302 30.00 Total : 30.00 74387 7/10/2014 08741 ANGULO, ANSELMO 2014-7 Polygraph/ Jul 14 001-2101-4201 150.00 Total : 150.00 74388 7/10/2014 09366 AQUA FLO 627271 Irrigation Supplies - Jun '14 001-6101-4309 482.96 627850 Irrigation Supplies - Jun '14 001-6101-4309 436.33 632028 Irrigation Supplies - Jun '14 001-6101-4309 133.80 Total : 1,053.09 74389 7/10/2014 08836 AQUARIUM OF PACIFIC 7902246 Summer Camp Trip 001-4601-4201 760.90 Total : 760.90 74390 7/10/2014 18620 ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL 1532 Ad for Environmental Services Analyst 001-1203-4201 100.00 1Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 100.00 74390 7/10/2014 18620 ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL 74391 7/10/2014 13361 AT AND T MOBILITY 287247228942 Cell Phone Usage - 5-25 to 6-24-14 001-2101-4304 570.32 001-3302-4304 302.34 Total : 872.66 74392 7/10/2014 07286 BARNETT, DOROTHY 04137 2013 Assessment Tax Rebate 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 74393 7/10/2014 18349 BARRAGAN, NANETTE 04254 Mileage Reimb for SCAG Conf- May 14 001-1101-4317 150.92 Total : 150.92 74394 7/10/2014 12387 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 14-473 CALPERS Review 001-1202-4201 7,075.00 Total : 7,075.00 74395 7/10/2014 18630 BARTH, RONALD 04351 Refund Parking Citation# 200075195 001-3302 53.00 Total : 53.00 74396 7/10/2014 15141 BAYSIDE MEDICAL CENTER 00009393-00 Prisoner Medical Services/ May 14 001-2101-4201 229.75 Total : 229.75 74397 7/10/2014 18036 BEACHSPORTS 04318 Instructor Pymts/ # 19756 - 57, 766 001-4601-4221 1,174.25 04318a Instructor Pymt/# 19756-57, 66 - Jul 14 001-4601-4221 740.25 Total : 1,914.50 74398 7/10/2014 14513 BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPS COM 04322 Instructor Pymt/ # 19905 - 06, 916 001-4601-4221 1,287.47 04322a Instructor Pymt/ # 19905-06, 16 - Jul 14 001-4601-4221 1,342.43 2Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 2,629.90 74398 7/10/2014 14513 BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPS COM 74399 7/10/2014 12491 BENSON, ALAN 117 Video Prod Underage Drinking Symposium 001-1101-4305 330.00 Total : 330.00 74400 7/10/2014 06409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS 295772-RI Asphalt Purchase - Jun '14 001-3104-4309 265.39 Total : 265.39 74401 7/10/2014 08482 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 81449002 Medical Supplies - June 14 001-2201-4309 17.10 81452935 Medical Supplies - June 14 001-2201-4309 931.62 81458035 Medical Supplies - June 14 001-2201-4309 788.87 81463484 Medical Supplies - June 14 001-2201-4309 76.28 Total : 1,813.87 74402 7/10/2014 17562 BOWEN, TIMOTHY D 04323 Instructor Pymt/ # 19725 - 26 001-4601-4221 708.74 04323a Instructor Pymt/ # 19725 - 26 - Jul 14 001-4601-4221 2,126.26 Total : 2,835.00 74403 7/10/2014 17424 BROWNELLS INC 10206326.00 Range Equipment 001-2101-4201 345.99 10206326.01 Range Equipment - Jun '14 001-2101-4201 79.98 Total : 425.97 74404 7/10/2014 11916 BURGOS, GEORGE 104-03873 Refund Overpayment Cit # 200076995 001-3302 5.00 Total : 5.00 74405 7/10/2014 14701 CAL PLANNING AND DEV REPORT 42814 Subscription Renewal/ K Robertson 3Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74405 7/10/2014 (Continued)14701 CAL PLANNING AND DEV REPORT 001-4101-4317 198.00 Total : 198.00 74406 7/10/2014 15663 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS 04338 Bldg Standards Admin Fee Report/ 4th Qtr 001-3204 853.20 Total : 853.20 74407 7/10/2014 00016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 4286211111 Water Usage - June 14 105-2601-4303 2,642.60 001-6101-4303 25,785.77 001-4204-4303 1,128.04 001-3304-4303 257.53 Total : 29,813.94 74408 7/10/2014 18069 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF A4303 E & B Oil Consult & Review/Jan '14 001-2109 1,008.24 Total : 1,008.24 74409 7/10/2014 17797 CBE OFFICE SOLUTIONS IN1600225 E-Subpoena Software Maint Agreement 153-2106-4201 9,279.95 Total : 9,279.95 74410 7/10/2014 00634 CHEVRON AND TEXACO CARD SER 41715705 Gas Card Purchases/Jun '14 715-2101-4310 591.39 Total : 591.39 74411 7/10/2014 16786 CI TECHNOLOGIES INC 4775 IA-Pro Software Maint Agreement 153-2106-4201 1,200.00 Total : 1,200.00 74412 7/10/2014 13743 COHEN, ANDREW 04092 Refund Cash Key# 210242 001-2117 21.00 Total : 21.00 74413 7/10/2014 13151 COLLINS, DOUGLAS R 04133 Cash Key Dep Refund#74386 001-2117 19.50 001-3851 15.50 4Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 35.00 74413 7/10/2014 13151 COLLINS, DOUGLAS R 74414 7/10/2014 18401 CRYSTAL LIGHTING CORP 9821 Light Fixture Lens/ Pier Lights 105-2601-4201 4,830.00 Total : 4,830.00 74415 7/10/2014 16897 CUSTOM TRAINING 04275 Regis/2 Attendees-Suicide Detect/Prevent 001-2101-4313 600.00 04276 Regis/ M.Zwoyer - Positive Confrontation 001-2101-4313 100.00 Total : 700.00 74416 7/10/2014 05029 DAVE BANG ASSOCIATES INC 38240 BBQ Grills - Valley and South Parks 001-6101-4309 1,075.75 Total : 1,075.75 74417 7/10/2014 18597 DAVIS, ANN 1204-04089 Refund Cash Key # 154711 001-2117 16.50 Total : 16.50 74418 7/10/2014 12991 DELL MARKETING LP XJF863437 Dell Optiplex 3020 Workstation 715-1206-5401 6,232.57 Total : 6,232.57 74419 7/10/2014 00049 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 04337 Strong Motion Mapping Fee/ 4th Qtr 001-3204 2,276.48 Total : 2,276.48 74420 7/10/2014 18612 DERAKHSHAN, MAHRAN 1204-03809 Refund Cit # 200092214 001-3302 10.00 Total : 10.00 74421 7/10/2014 17850 DERMSTORE LLC 03801 Refund/Unused Monthly Permit# 11380 001-3858 62.00 Total : 62.00 74422 7/10/2014 00122 DUNCAN PARKING TECHNOLOGIES CSBAP000032 Cites Issued & Online Pymts/ May 14 001-1204-4201 4,918.77 5Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 4,918.77 74422 7/10/2014 00122 DUNCAN PARKING TECHNOLOGIES 74423 7/10/2014 17120 EAN SERVICES LLC 03718 Citation Refund/ # 2000096440 001-3302 23.00 03790 Citation Refund/ # 200097511 001-3302 53.00 Total : 76.00 74424 7/10/2014 00181 EASY READER 2181 Ad / Summer Camp 2014 001-4601-4302 1,338.00 Total : 1,338.00 74425 7/10/2014 07853 EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING AND EQUIP 9525 Clean & Video Inspect Sewers/ May 14 160-3102-4201 3,045.00 Total : 3,045.00 74426 7/10/2014 16932 FAMILY THEATRE INC 04321 Instructor Pymt/ # 19859 - 60 001-4601-4221 287.00 04321a Instructor Pymt/ # 19859 - 60 - Jul 14 001-4601-4221 861.00 Total : 1,148.00 74427 7/10/2014 17901 FLINT TRADING INC 170672 Numbers for Parking Stalls 001-3305-4309 1,132.35 Total : 1,132.35 74428 7/10/2014 07910 FOSTER GORDON MANUFACTURING CO28540 Presentation Folders/ Council 001-1101-4305 574.82 Total : 574.82 74429 7/10/2014 18604 GEARY, ERIN 04094 Cash Key Refund# 101640 001-2117 14.50 Total : 14.50 74430 7/10/2014 18599 GERAGHTY, JAMES 1202-04162 2013 Assessment Tax Rebate 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 6Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74431 7/10/2014 18611 HARDIN, SEAN B 1204-03901 Refund Cit # 200094298 001-3302 28.00 Total : 28.00 74432 7/10/2014 10909 HUB INTERNATIONAL 04288 Tulip Insurance/ June 14 001-3897 162.10 Total : 162.10 74433 7/10/2014 18196 HUDSON MOTORCYCLES 2535 Replace Battery Charger Motor# 2 715-2101-4311 311.79 Total : 311.79 74434 7/10/2014 16793 HUNTINGTON BEACH MOTORSPORTS 77696 Repairs on 2011 Honda 715-2101-4311 602.11 Total : 602.11 74435 7/10/2014 18615 HUTTON, TREVOR 1204-03716 Refund Overpayment Cit # 200104345 001-3302 2.00 Total : 2.00 74436 7/10/2014 18628 IPT STONE SERVICE 14305 Restoration/ Memorial Stone Plaque 715-4204-4201 965.00 Total : 965.00 74437 7/10/2014 12151 JAHNG, CHRISTOPHER Y 04149 Instructor Pymt/ # 19677 001-4601-4221 1,163.75 04149a Instructor Pymt/ # 19677 - Jul 14 001-4601-4221 332.50 Total : 1,496.25 74438 7/10/2014 18610 JAILANI, MARYAM 1204-03938 Refund Cit # 200063257 001-3302 53.00 Total : 53.00 74439 7/10/2014 18618 JB BOSTICK COMPANY INC 26893 Paving/ Lot A 001-8651-4201 4,992.00 Total : 4,992.00 7Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74440 7/10/2014 11940 KARENS CLEANERS 03599 Replace Uniform Patches/ PD 001-2101-4314 1,438.80 Total : 1,438.80 74441 7/10/2014 18137 KOSMONT COMPANIES 0004 Professional Svc-Debt Forecast/FY13/14 001-1202-4201 351.00 Total : 351.00 74442 7/10/2014 18626 KREAGER, KEVIN 04336 Citation Refund# 200073667 001-3302 53.00 Total : 53.00 74443 7/10/2014 18601 LAMBROS, GEORGE 04118 Pking Permit Refund#'s 15-08021/22 001-3843 80.00 Total : 80.00 74444 7/10/2014 00842 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 2869 Membership Dues 001-1101-4315 1,212.75 Total : 1,212.75 74445 7/10/2014 02175 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 180970 South Bay Employment Consortium 001-1203-4317 3,893.50 Total : 3,893.50 74446 7/10/2014 13066 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF 48H-50-3734-15-005 LARA Membership Fee 117-5301-4315 2,026.71 Total : 2,026.71 74447 7/10/2014 18595 MADANI, MIKE 060214 Car Washes/PD 715-2101-4311 8.00 070114 Car Wahes/PD 715-2101-4311 4.00 Total : 12.00 74448 7/10/2014 18274 MAGNUM VENTURE PARTNERS 04150 Instructor Pymt/ # 19677 001-4601-4221 1,163.75 04150a Instructor Pymt/ # 19677 - Jul 14 001-4601-4221 332.50 8Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,496.25 74448 7/10/2014 18274 MAGNUM VENTURE PARTNERS 74449 7/10/2014 18571 MAJOR SURPLUS AND SUPPLY 2093027 Emergency Drinking Water 001-2101-4350 4,394.50 2093998 Emergency Food Supplies 001-2101-4350 773.05 Total : 5,167.55 74450 7/10/2014 18613 MC KINNON, MICHAEL 1204-03719 Refund Overpayment Cit # 200098468 001-3302 53.00 Total : 53.00 74451 7/10/2014 18071 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SERVICES 42754 Remove 2 Palm Trees from Lot A 105-2601-4201 1,100.00 43029 Tree & Sod Removal/ Ocean Garden 001-6101-4201 2,530.00 Total : 3,630.00 74452 7/10/2014 18600 MERJANIAN, KATHY 04126 Cash Key Refund# 219460 001-2117 21.00 Total : 21.00 74453 7/10/2014 06210 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION A53473 Membership Renewal/ L Abbott 001-1121-4315 99.00 A53498 Errors & Omission Notary Ins/ L Abbott 001-1121-4315 33.00 A53504 Errors & Omissions Ins/ E Doerfling 001-1121-4315 33.00 A53504a Errors & Omissions Ins/ T Dinubilo 001-1121-4315 33.00 Total : 198.00 74454 7/10/2014 13114 OFFICE DEPOT 691949828001 Office Supplies/Jan '14 001-1101-4305 7.84 714160410001 Office Supplies/May '14 001-4202-4305 230.03 9Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74454 7/10/2014 (Continued)13114 OFFICE DEPOT 714502345001 Office Supplies/May '14 001-4202-4305 74.56 Total : 312.43 74455 7/10/2014 18594 ONEY, TRAVIS OR RUTH 1204-04007 Refund Cit # 200082470 Admin Review 001-3302 53.00 1204-04008 Refund Cit # 200082465 Admin Review 001-3302 38.00 Total : 91.00 74456 7/10/2014 18617 PA PARTNERSHIP 1204-03696 Refund Bus Lic # 00609000 Overpayment 001-3115 253.00 Total : 253.00 74457 7/10/2014 13309 PEREZ, SHAWN 04320 Instructor Pymt/ # 19704 - 05 001-4601-4221 365.75 04320a Instructor Pymt/ # 19704 - 05 - Jul 14 001-4601-4221 173.25 Total : 539.00 74458 7/10/2014 17064 PET MART 00302 Dog Food - K9 Officer Keef 170-2105-4309 163.71 00597 K9 Supplies - Keef/ Jul 14 170-2105-4309 178.72 Total : 342.43 74459 7/10/2014 17130 PH AND S PRODUCTS LLC 0004844 Gloves/ FD 001-2201-4309 214.00 0004974 Gloves/ FD 001-2201-4309 214.00 Total : 428.00 74460 7/10/2014 12910 PIP PRINTING 25967 Fire Exception Slips 001-2201-4305 477.94 Total : 477.94 10Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74461 7/10/2014 13838 PITNEY BOWES INC 216402-JN14 Postage Meter Rental/ 4th Quarter 715-1208-4201 455.18 385828 Postage Supplies 001-1208-4305 331.53 41593260205 Postage 001-1208-4305 2,078.26 526725 Postage Meter Maint/ 1-14 - 6-14 715-1208-4201 57.00 Total : 2,921.97 74462 7/10/2014 02980 POWER MAINTENANCE CORPORATION33045 Service Agreement/ UPS System Maint 001-2101-4201 2,975.00 Total : 2,975.00 74463 7/10/2014 16687 PROVICENCE LCM SAN PEDRO 21 SART Exam/ FY 13-14 001-2101-4201 730.00 Total : 730.00 74464 7/10/2014 08445 PROVIDENCE LITTLE CO OF 76200000405501 Blood Alcohol Draw/ # 76200000405501 001-2101-4201 35.00 Total : 35.00 74465 7/10/2014 01911 PROVIDENCE MEDICAL INSTITUTE 1010127 Medical Exam/SART# 141347 001-2101-4201 1,460.00 Total : 1,460.00 74466 7/10/2014 02715 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER INC 5501229 Batteries for Tait Radios/Ref#5501229 001-2101-4307 236.27 Total : 236.27 74467 7/10/2014 18605 RANDOLPH, JOHN 04091 Cash Key Refund# 213397 001-2117 21.00 Total : 21.00 74468 7/10/2014 18609 ROBIDART, WARD A 1204-03940 Refund Cit # 1212007854 001-3302 48.00 Total : 48.00 11Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74469 7/10/2014 03726 RUSHER AIR CONDITIONING 202272 AC Maint - Comm Ctr/ Feb 14 001-4204-4201 400.00 2043762 Inspect A/C & Heater/PD 001-4204-4201 173.00 2044123 AC Maint - City Hall/ Apr 14 001-4204-4201 338.00 Total : 911.00 74470 7/10/2014 18602 SAKAMOTO, LAWRENCE 1204-04097 Refund Cit # 200078876 001-3302 83.00 Total : 83.00 74471 7/10/2014 16561 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION 03791 Cite Overpayment Refund# 200098128 001-3302 30.00 Total : 30.00 74472 7/10/2014 18608 SINGER, ALEXA 1204-03945 Refund Cit # 200072180 001-3302 53.00 Total : 53.00 74473 7/10/2014 18623 SKECHERS 04190 Gen Plan Amendment - Text 001-6803 4,076.00 001-3811 1,871.00 001-3803 1,664.00 001-3824 1,106.00 001-3856 500.00 001-1121-4323 190.00 001-3825 212.00 Total : 9,619.00 74474 7/10/2014 00343 SO CAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVTS 51514 Membership Dues 001-1101-4315 1,952.00 Total : 1,952.00 74475 7/10/2014 07704 SOUTH BAY CHILDRENS HEALTH CTR 04293 Donation - SB Youth Project 001-2101-4201 4,000.00 Total : 4,000.00 12Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 13 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74476 7/10/2014 00341 SOUTH BAY CITIES COUNCIL OF 5114 Membership Dues 001-1101-4315 8,991.00 Total : 8,991.00 74477 7/10/2014 18619 SOUTH BAY DOOR AND WINDOW 268 Replacement Windows - Comm Ctr/ Dep 001-4204-4309 1,653.84 Total : 1,653.84 74478 7/10/2014 08812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC COMM 02353 Dispatch Services/ 1st Quarter 001-2101-4251 131,312.00 001-3302-4251 16,414.00 001-2201-4251 16,414.00 223 MDC Repair/May 14 715-2201-4311 125.00 233 Rear Back Up Cams 715-2201-4311 215.82 Total : 164,480.82 74479 7/10/2014 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 2-01-414-1071 Electrical Billing - Jun 14 001-4204-4303 4,170.01 2-01-414-2152 Electrical Billing - Jun 14 001-6101-4303 2,002.68 2-01-414-5106 Electrical Billing - Jun 14 001-3104-4303 529.45 2-23-687-8021 Electrical Billing - Jun 14 001-3104-4303 72.42 2-23-725-4420 Electrical Billing - Jun 14 001-4204-4303 7,171.02 Total : 13,945.58 74480 7/10/2014 15212 SPLASH WATERPARK 03573 Summer Camp Trip/ Balance 001-4601-4201 432.45 Total : 432.45 74481 7/10/2014 14019 SUNSTATE EQUIPMENT COMPANY 12231074 Equip Rent/Light Towers-Plaza, July 4th 001-3301-4201 1,313.16 13Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 14 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74481 7/10/2014 (Continued)14019 SUNSTATE EQUIPMENT COMPANY 5613152-007 Equip Rental/ Emergency Generator - PD 001-4204-4201 1,238.72 5613152-009 Equip Rental/ Emergency Generator - PD 001-4204-4201 1,238.72 Total : 3,790.60 74482 7/10/2014 18614 THOMAS, ALLEN 1204-03717 Refund Overpayment Cit # 200096237 001-3302 8.00 Total : 8.00 74483 7/10/2014 16735 TORRANCE AUTO PARTS 2250 Auto Parts Purchase - May '14 715-2101-4310 71.68 715-3302-4311 159.34 715-4202-4311 589.10 715-6101-4311 9.20 715-3302-4311 72.96 001-2021 1.49 001-2022 -1.49 Total : 902.28 74484 7/10/2014 00123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE 1009 Hardware Purchases - May '14 001-2201-4309 146.08 001-3104-4309 316.54 001-6101-4309 424.48 105-2601-4309 1,219.17 715-4206-4309 91.50 001-2021 89.41 001-2022 -89.41 Total : 2,197.77 74485 7/10/2014 13960 TURKOLU, MELINDA 1202-04161 2013 Assessment Tax Rebate 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.61 74486 7/10/2014 01938 V AND V MANUFACTURING 39535 Chief's Hat Badge Piece 001-2101-4314 90.24 14Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 15 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 90.24 74486 7/10/2014 01938 V AND V MANUFACTURING 74487 7/10/2014 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 310 197-3683 Phone Charges - jUN '14 715-1206-4304 230.12 001-3302-4304 66.93 001-2101-4304 822.21 001-4204-4321 188.75 001-2201-4304 43.41 001-4601-4304 86.88 001-4202-4304 133.43 001-4201-4304 135.62 001-3304-4304 53.38 001-1204-4304 43.53 15Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 16 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74487 7/10/2014 (Continued)00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 310 376-6984 Phone Charges - 4/16 - 5/16/14 001-1203-4304 13.56 001-1208-4304 4.93 001-2101-4304 395.70 001-2201-4304 136.83 001-4101-4304 66.57 001-4201-4304 59.17 001-4202-4304 125.74 001-4601-4304 97.39 001-1204-4304 91.22 001-3302-4304 43.15 715-1206-4304 23.42 001-1132-4304 5.11 001-1141-4304 7.66 001-1201-4304 70.25 001-1202-4304 67.69 001-1203-4304 14.05 001-1208-4304 5.11 001-2101-4304 410.00 001-2201-4304 141.78 001-4101-4304 68.98 001-4201-4304 61.32 001-4202-4304 130.28 001-4601-4304 100.91 001-1204-4304 94.52 001-3302-4304 44.71 715-1206-4304 24.27 001-1121-4304 29.59 001-1132-4304 4.93 001-1141-4304 7.40 001-1201-4304 67.80 001-1202-4304 65.33 001-1121-4304 30.66 310 UH0-3618 Phone Charges - Jun '14 001-2101-4304 438.63 16Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 17 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 74487 7/10/2014 (Continued)00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 310 VM6-6158 Phone Charges - Jun '14 001-2101-4304 47.93 Total : 4,800.85 74488 7/10/2014 17272 VYSEL, JUANITA 255559 Class Refund# 19852 001-2111 85.00 Total : 85.00 74489 7/10/2014 18625 WEINSTEIN, SHERI 04095 Cash Key Dep Refund/# 124154 001-2117 93.00 Total : 93.00 74490 7/10/2014 00371 WEST BASIN WATER ASSOCIATION 61014 Membership Dues/ 14-15 001-1101-4315 500.00 Total : 500.00 74491 7/10/2014 18629 WESTERN ENGINEERING GROUP 01 Clark Field Lighting / Prog Pymt # 1 125-8602-4201 2,950.00 01a 710 Pier Ave Electrical Upgrade/Pymt# 1 301-8649-4201 6,700.00 Total : 9,650.00 74492 7/10/2014 18616 WHITE, CHERYL 1204-03715 Refund Overpayment Cit # 200102574 001-3302 15.00 Total : 15.00 74493 7/10/2014 17822 YALE CHASE EQUIPMENT SI88907 GENERAC INDUSTRIAL DIESEL GENERATOR 715-2101-5405 22,606.60 Total : 22,606.60 74494 7/10/2014 18598 YOCUM, SHANNON 1204-04086 Refund Bus Lic # 1134067 001-3115 180.00 001-6851 1.00 Total : 181.00 74495 7/10/2014 10505 ZOLL MEDICAL CORP 2131508 Medical Supplies / May 14 001-2201-4309 257.51 17Page: 07/10/2014 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 18 5:09:09PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 257.51 74495 7/10/2014 10505 ZOLL MEDICAL CORP 147592 7/10/2014 14008 YORK SCRMA 07102014 W/Comp Claims - 7/07/14 705-1217-4324 22,510.14 Total : 22,510.14 Bank total : 418,989.84 114 Vouchers for bank code :boa 418,989.84Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 114 "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 18 inclusive, of the check register for 7-10-14 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 7-14-14 18Page: July 14, 2014 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 2014 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS JULY 29, 2014 PUBLIC HEARINGS Oil Project: Development Agreement Ballot Measure Community Development Director MUNICIPAL MATTERS Free Parking and Demand Pricing for Downtown Management Analyst Pier/Strand Hotel – Preliminary consent to study use of City property in application process Community Development Director AUGUST 12, 2014 – NO MEETING AUGUST 26, 2014 @ 5:00PM STUDY SESSION: USE OF PIER PLAZA AND ENFORCEMENT AUGUST 26, 2014 PRESENTATIONS LEADERSHIP HERMOSA BEACH PRESENTS ALUMNI PROJECT CONSENT CALENDAR Workers Compensation – 3rd Party Administrator Contract Assistant to the City Manager Award of Contract – Fire Beacon Fire Chief MUNICIPAL MATTERS Receive and File Oil Project Cost Benefit Analysis Community Development Director Receive and File Oil Project Health Impact Assessment Community Development Director Policy review regarding – Bars and Restaurants Conditional Use Permits Community Development Director MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER Strategic Plan Update City Manager SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 @ 6:00PM STUDY SESSION: EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AT EOC 2 PENDING ITEMS Consideration of reduction of business license fee request from Carol G. Weiss, Ph.D. Finance Director Green Zone Recommendations and the Installation of Silver and Green Meters Downtown Police Chief Procurement Policies – RFP City Manager Ethics Policy City Manager & Finance Director Contract Public Information and Communications Plan City Manager SCE Update City Manager SEPTEMBER 2014 Events Policy Discussion Assistant to City Manager Citywide Service Level/Performance Benchmark System Report Finance Director AES Resolution, Intervener, Future Development on the Site Community Development Director Communications Plan and Direction City Manager Living Streets Update Report Public Works Director Public Safety Service and Staffing: Quarterly Report Police Chief / Fire Chief Public Information and Communications Plan Adoption City Manager Cypress Avenue – Direction on Zoning Changes for Manufacturing Uses Community Development Director Update on Direction for Schools Strategy and Specific Actions: Support for Top Quality Schools City Manager Fee Discussion – EV Chargers Public Works Director Priority Based Budgeting Report Finance Director Downtown Action Plan Community Development Director OCTOBER 2014 Carbon Neutral Municipality – Economic Comparison and Solar Report – Early Actions and Overall Direction City Manager Carbon Neutral Municipality: A. SCE Street Light Energy Efficiency: Update Report B. Municipal GHG Emissions Inventory: Update Report (SBCCOG) Community Development Director Carbon Neutral Community Policy, Direction on Plan Development Community Development Director NOVEMBER 2014 Compensation Study and Policy Direction Assistant to the City Manager National Citizen Survey Overview Assistant to the City Manager DECEMBER 2014 Comprehensive City Facilities Master Plan – Award Contract Public Works Director Carbon Neutral Municipality: A. Final SCAG Report: Setting Target, Action Plan, Funding – Employee Commute Program B. Net Zero Carbon Policy for City Facilities and Service Delivery Analysis C. Renewable Energy Policy for City Facilities and Service Delivery Community Development Director Strategic Plan – Quarterly Update City Manager JANUARY 2015 None FEBRUARY 2015 Employee Salaries/Benefits Funding Assistant to the City Manager July 21, 2014 To: Hermosa Beach Council Members, City of Hermosa Beach From: Barbara Ellman, Hermosa Beach Ca. RE: Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Agenda Item 6D / Election Date for Proposed Oil Drilling Project Dear City Council Members, As a Hermosa Beach mineral rights owner, I received the attached letter from Steve Layton, President of E & B Natural Resources dated June 27, 2013. This invitation was sent to mineral rights owners so they could ask questions related to the oil drilling project and learn about their “mineral interest ownership”. The letter specifically states “the project will then be decided by the Hermosa Beach voters by a ballot measure estimated to be held in November of 2014”. After attending the July 8 2014, city council meeting, it became evident to me that E & B has taken the stand that they don’t know where the idea of voting in November 2014 came from. I believe E&B is not being honest with the residents and that this is another delay tactic by the oil company because they realize the residents of Hermosa Beach have not been swayed by their P.R. campaign. I respectfully request that the council put this measure to a vote this fall of 2014 as stated on the city website. Thank you, Barbara Ellman 530 Loma Dr Hermosa Beach Ca 90254 July 21, 2014 To: Honorable Council Members, City of Hermosa Beach From: Dave Andrews, 11th Street, Hermosa Beach (resident) RE: City Council Meeting Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Agenda Item 6D ELECTION DATE for Proposed Oil Drilling and Production Operations Dear Council Members, “WE FEEL STRONGLY THAT THE PROJECT IS GAINING SUPPORT AND LOOK FORWARD TO A SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME ON THE NOVEMBER 2014 BALLOT INITIATIVE.” – E & B’s Website, June 2013 “PLEASE FIND MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE 2014 BALLOT INITIATIVE PROCESS ON THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH’s WEBSITE”- E &B’s Website, Current Two and a half years and countless reports, piles of studies, reams of communications, multitudes of community workshops, open houses and presentations, overworked staff, 2 am city council meetings and a stressed-out and increasingly divisive community. A complete, comprehensive EIR had been delivered and is now certified. WE HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION THAT WE NEED TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION AND ARE READY TO VOTE ON WHETHER OR NOT WE MAINTAIN THE OIL DRILLING BAN AT THE EARLIEST DATE POSSIBLE. This process has taken a lot of coordination, all in order to prepare for the ballot measure as mandated in the settlement agreement. With E &B Oil’s full knowledge and cooperation, a November 2014 election has been the planned-for date. I have come across well over 50 references to a November election on the E&B website, the city’s website, the first HIA, Los Angeles Times, The Beach Reporter, Easy Reader, Daily Breeze, Hermosa Beach Patch, Refinery News, NBC 4 LA, ABC 7 LA, Kcal 9 LA, Orange County Register, Bakersfield Californian, LA Biz Journals, and the San Diego Union Tribune. Instead of commending the city for working so hard; thanking our council for approving increased pay for longer hours for our hard working city clerk; or acknowledging that a consulting (oil) attorney was hired to assist with the development agreement, I watched with a fascinated disbelief as Mr. Layton, in a debut appearance, and E & B representatives took the low road at the prior city council meeting. They are now engaged in game playing. And the game is bullying the city to move the election date and disenfranchise voters. They have not presented one solid, honest reason to up-end everything and move the date. I am deeply troubled by E & B’s actions, as this seems to be a pattern of behavior. Ultimately, the decision to move forward with a November election or not, is in your hands. As noted in the Settlement Agreement, “its (the city council’s) discretion and its contractual obligation to place the ballot measure on the ballot” with reference made to Election Code 9222, which notes this official power. And “X. Further Cooperation” states that “time will be of the essence of actions required of any of the Parties”. E & B has a duty to cooperate. I know that you are giving this very careful thought. Thank you. I know that you will put our community first, proceed with care, and make a wise decision. Sincerely, Dave Andrews 11th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 #DATE PUBLICATION URL QUOTE 1 2013 City of Hermosa Beach - CBA - RFP http://www.hermosabch.org/modules/show document.aspx?documentid=2652 The City hopes to put the project before the voters no later than November 2014. 2 3/13/2012 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/general- news/20120314/residents-protesting- hermosa-beach-oil-drilling-plan Key points in the settlement stipulate that the city's liability will be limited to $17.5 million, and that any oil drilling project will require voter approval. A ballot measure is expected to go before voters by March 2013. 3 4/5/2012 Easy Reader news http://www.easyreadernews.com/49351/her mosa-news-briefbeach-2/ E&B Natural Resources Management Corporation has reached out to Hermosa Beach residents with an open letter from President Steve Layton, promising an open dialogue with the community and an extensive environmental review before voters weigh a planned drilling project next year. 4 6/14/2012 Easy Reader News http://www.easyreadernews.com/52780/eb- president-hermosa-oil-drilling-safe/ E&B Natural Resources Management Corp. paid Macpherson $30 million as part of a March settlement between the city and Macpherson, ending 14 years of legal limbo for the city. The settlement returns the project to the voters, who will decide the question of oil revenue and city image probably in November 5 9/1/2012 EBNR - Way Back Machine - September 2012 https://web.archive.org/web/201305070731 47/http://www.ebnr- hermosa.com/materials/questions-answers Q: Will there be any oil production at the City’s maintenance yard? - That decision will ultimately rest where it should, with Hermosa Beach voters. Voters will have an opportunity in 2013 or 2014 to cast their vote on a specific proposal to convert the City’s maintenance yard (an industrial space at Valley Drive and 6th 6 10/18/2012 Easy Reader News http://www.easyreadernews.com/59231/oil- trail-crude-oil-crusades-span-generations- in-hermosa-beach/ At the earliest, city voters will decide in the spring of 2014 whether or not to allow wells dug at the maintenance yard. 7 11/15/2012 Easy Reader News http://www.easyreadernews.com/61012/eb- files-application-to-drill-for-oil-in-hermosa- beach/ Filing the application, which is more than 1,000 pages, is the first official step in a lengthy process that will ultimately lead to a vote at the polls by residents in 2014. 8 11/15/2012 Easy Reader News http://www.easyreadernews.com/61012/eb- files-application-to-drill-for-oil-in-hermosa- beach/ Filing the application, which is more than 1,000 pages, is the first official step in a lengthy process that will ultimately lead to a vote at the polls by residents in 2014. Residents can download and view the entire application at hermosabch.org. 9 12/30/2012 Refinery News http://refinerynews.com/oil-drilling-in- hermosa-beach-2012-newsmaker/ However, in a deal negotiated to avoid major liability for the city, EB paid $30 million to Macpherson to have the opportunity to convince voters to support the oil project, and residents will go to the polls sometime in 2014 to decide. 10 1/25/2013 Hermosa Beach Patch http://hermosabeach.patch.com/groups/poli tics-and-elections/p/e-b-oil-project- discussion-lively-at-meeting "The earliest that we would see a vote of the people would be spring of 2014," Bakaly said. 11 2/21/2013 Easy Reader News - Steve Layton http://www.easyreadernews.com/65936/oil- recovery-will-benefit-hermosa-beach/ Understanding the range of potential outcomes will be an important part of the dialogue that will take place over the next 12 months regarding the potential benefits of the project. 12 3/5/2013 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/general- news/20130306/hermosa-beach-would- earn-500-million-from-proposed-drilling- project-oil-company-says It was completed by William Hamm of the Berkeley Research Group, which was hired by E&B to determine how much revenue the city and school district would receive if voters approve the project. It could go up for a vote in the spring of 13 5/7/2013 Hermosa Beach Patch http://hermosabeach.patch.com/groups/poli tics-and-elections/p/city-to-conduct-studies- on-proposed-oil-project The oil production project, which would take place at the city’s maintenance yard at 6th Street and Valley Drive, will be squelched or move forward, depending on how Hermosans vote in an as-yet-to-be determined election, projected for March or 14 5/15/2013 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/general- news/20130516/hermosa-beach-cited-for- not-seeking-permit-for-testing-at-citys- maintenance-yard E&B is proposing an oil-drilling project at the city's maintenance yard, and residents will vote next year on whether to lift a local ban on drilling. 15 5/31/2013 NBC 4 LA - Video - :28 and 2:25 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RK0xW mcJIJ8&feature=youtu.be - with a ballot measure in 2014 - Was allowing for this particular ballot measure in 2014 16 6/27/2013 E&B Natural Resources http://www.ebresources.com/eb-natural- resources-continues-record-growth/ Finally, E&B is pleased to report that the company’s Hermosa Beach project application package was deemed complete and the environmental review is underway. Also, we feel strongly that the project is gaining support and look forward to a successful outcome on the November 2014 ballot initiative. 17 7/13/2013 City of Hermosa Beach - Hermosa 2020 & Beyond - Page 5 http://hermosabeach.granicus.com/MetaVi ewer.php?view_id=6&clip_id=2419&meta_i d=125003 The Planning Commission and City Council will hold noticed public hearings to consider the determinations required by CEQA. Mitigation measures to reduce project impacts will be incorporated into a Development Agreement to be placed on the ballot in November 2014. 18 7/22/2013 Los Angeles Times http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/22/local/l a-me-hermosa-beach-oil-20130722 But there was one major caveat: E&B could again ask Hermosa voters to overturn the drilling ban. The election, which will be paid for by E&B, could happen as early as next spring. 19 7/23/2013 ABC 7 News - Video - 2:00 http://stophermosabeachoil.com/?portfolio= hermosa-beach-considers-renewing-oil- drilling When will voters decide the issue, Both sides agree that it will probably be in November of next year. 20 7/25/2013 Kcal 9 - Video - 1:22 http://stophermosabeachoil.com/?portfolio= hermosa-beach-asks-residents-to-debate- merits-of-drilling Under a settlement agreement a settlement to lift the ban is on next years ballot. 21 7/25/2013 NBC LA - Video - :20 http://stophermosabeachoil.com/?portfolio=hermosa-beach-residents-fighting-proposed-oil-drilling-project- The we're talking about isn't scheduled until late next year. 22 7/28/2013 Beach Reporter - YouTube - 22 seconds in http://youtu.be/jaOosYRz_9M As Hermosa Beach Residents preapre to go to the polls next year. 23 8/9/2013 San Diego Union Tribune - Called out on the EBNR- Hermosa Beach main page http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2013/Aug /09/greenhut-oil-drilling-hermosa- beach/?#article-copy But E&B Natural Resources must first tap political support in this environmentally friendly beachfront community by securing a favorable vote in a citywide initiative likely to be on the November 2014 ballot. 24 11/6/2013 City of Hermosa Beach http://www.hermosabch.org/modules/show document.aspx?documentid=3633 #12 The City anticipates placing the measure on the November 2014 ballot, which requires the City Council to take action by the end of July 2014. 25 2/1/2014 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/government-and-politics/20140201/hermosa-beach-begins-to-engage-residents-on-oil-drilling-proposal “If residents vote in favor of the measure, tentatively set for the November election, the city would have to pay $3.5 million, and it could reap lucrative profits from the project. If voters turn it down, the city will have to pay the $17.5 million settlement.” 26 2/13/2014 City of Hermosa Beach http://www.hermosabch.org/modules/show document.aspx?documentid=3659 "The City intends to make these reports accessible to the community in order for residents to educate themselves about the project, which is scheduled to be considered by the electorate on the November, 2014 ballot," states Tom Bakaly, City Manager of Hermosa Beach. 27 2/16/2014 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/environment-and-nature/20140216/reports-oil-spills-smelly-air-and-health-threats-possible-downsides-of-hermosa-beach-oil-drilling-proposal City officials are poring over the massive analyses released publicly last week to better understand the ramifications if voters approve an oil-drilling measure tentatively set for election in November. 28 2/25/2014 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/business/20140225/final-workshop-set-for-proposed-oil-and-gas-drilling-project-in-hermosa-beach City Manager Tom Bakaly said the city commissioned the additional health and financial studies to address all possible concerns, before residents vote in November on whether to allow drilling. 29 2/26/2014 Beach Reporter http://tbrnews.com/news/hermosabeach/cit y-vows-to-support-residents-quest-to- understand-oil-related/articled988151c- 9f24-11e3-a8ab-001a4bcf887a.html “The city intends to make these reports accessible to the community in order for residents to educate themselves about the project, which is scheduled to be considered by the electorate on the November 2014 ballot,” said City Manager Tom Bakaly. “Our goal is to provide facts to the voters. 30 3/4/2014 City of Hermosa Beach - Update on E&B's Proposed Oil Drilling and Production Project - Page 9 http://hermosabeach.granicus.com/MetaVi ewer.php?view_id=4&clip_id=2988&meta_i d=145671 The City anticipates place the measure on the November 2014 ballot, which requires the City Council to take action by the end of July 2014. 31 3/30/2014 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/business/2014 0330/eb-launches-campaign-to-answer- hermosa-beach-drilling-opponents If residents vote in favor of the measure, tentatively set for the November election, the city will have to pay $3.5 million to E&B but could reap lucrative profits from the project. 32 4/4/2014 Easy Reader News http://www.easyreadernews.com/82234/her mosa-beach-weighs-draft-environmental- impact-report/ The report is intended to give residents information needed to make a decision regarding the project’s future, must be finalized before a citywide vote can happen to uphold or overturn the ban on oil drilling in Hermosa Beach. The vote could happen as soon as November. 33 4/7/2014 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/business/20140407/consultant-withdraws-report-citing-serious-health-effects-from-proposed-hermosa-beach-drilling-project Explaining her company’s decision to withdraw the report, Mary McDaniel wrote to city officials: “Some of the concerns affect multiple parts of the document calling for more extensive revision. I apologize for having to take this step, but in the end I believe that we will have a more useful document for the voters and other stakeholders in Hermosa Beach in preparation for the 34 4/9/2014 Easy Reader News http://www.easyreadernews.com/82483/co nsulting-group-hermosa-beach-withdraw- health-impact-assessment/ A citywide vote on the proposed oil drilling project could occur as soon as November. 35 4/9/2014 Easy Reader News http://www.easyreadernews.com/82483/co nsulting-group-hermosa-beach-withdraw- health-impact-assessment/ A citywide vote on the proposed oil drilling project could occur as soon as November. 36 4/18/2014 Orange County Register http://www.ocregister.com/articles/hermosa-610450-beach-oil.html At issue is a simple question voters figure to answer in November 37 4/25/2014 Los Angeles Times http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-0426- hermosa-oil-loan-20140426-story.html Muratsuchi says that he hopes to pass the bill by the end of the summer before voters decide on the oil question in November. 38 4/25/2014 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/business/20140425/state-lawmaker-introduces-bill-to-help-hermosa-beach-fight-oil-drilling-proposal - Two state lawmakers opposed to a proposed oil and gas drilling project in Hermosa Beach announced legislation Friday that would make it easier for the city’s voters to turn it down later this year. - The vote is tentatively scheduled to take place in November. 39 4/25/2014 Easy Reader News http://www.easyreadernews.com/83109/mu ratsuchi-bill-loan-hermosa-state-funds-oil- payment/ Muratsuchi, who is seeking reelection on the November ballot, announced the Hermosa Beach Tideland Oil Revenue Loan Bill (AB 2711) at a press conference Friday morning at the Hermosa Beach pier. 40 5/4/2014 Capital Cal News - DiVirgillio - State of Hermosa Addresshttp://capoliticalnews.com/2014/05/04/will-hermosa-beach-go-bankrupt-because-it-violated-oil-agreement/ Hermosa Beach Mayor Michael DiVirgilio stressed that the city’s top priority is getting the proposed oil project on the ballot in 2014 at the annual State of the City address Thursday night at the Beach House. Last year, the city and E&B Natural Resources signed an agreement that would allow E&B to call for an election as early 41 5/6/2014 Los Angeles Times http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me- ln-hermosa-beach-oil-drilling-20140425- story.html E&B's project proposal is currently undergoing environmental, health impacts and cost benefit reviews, and city leaders are trying to meet a summer deadline to place the measure on the ballot in November. 42 5/6/2014 Los Angeles Times http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me- ln-hermosa-beach-supports-oil-loan-bill- 20140505-story.html Opponents of oil drilling have called the bill an “innovative” way to relieve financial pressure that voters may feel as they make their choice this November. 43 5/6/2014 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/business/20140506/hermosa-beach-city-council-supports-state-loan-if-voters-reject-oil-drilling “Ultimately, the residents of Hermosa Beach should have the opportunity to vote their conscience in November without the fear of having millions of dollars in addition to the $17.5 million that they would already owe,” said Melissa Uribe, Muratsuchi’s field representative. 44 5/13/2014 Easy Reader News http://www.easyreadernews.com/83505/ass emblyman-requests-11-5-million-oil-loan- hermosa/ The city and E&B Natural Resources signed an agreement last year that would allow E&B to call for an election as soon as November to lift Hermosa’s ban on oil drilling. 45 5/14/2014 Easy Reader News http://www.easyreadernews.com/83818/up dates-proposed-hermosa-oil-project/ E&B raised the issue of whether the drilling project’s Environmental Impact Report will be ready in time for the issue to go on the November ballot. The city maintains that the EIR is on track to be certified in time for a 2014 election. 46 5/23/2014 Easy Reader News http://www.easyreadernews.com/84323/her mosa-beach-oil-attorney/ The city entered an agreement with E&B last year that would allow the company to call for an election as early as November to lift Hermosa’s ban on oil drilling. 47 5/28/2014 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/business/20140528/hermosa-beach-will-spend-another-50000-to-study-impacts-of-oil-drilling-proposal Once it is approved, the council can call for the November election to take place. 48 5/29/2014 LA Biz Journals http://www.bizjournals.com/losangeles/news/2014/05/29/hermosa-beach-to-spend-more-on-another-oil-drill.html To drill or not to drill is a question that will ultimately be decided by Hermosa Beach voters at the ballot box in November. 49 6/1/2014 City of Hermos Beach http://www.hermosabch.org/modules/show document.aspx?documentid=4371 FEIR Hearing Schedule - mentions date 50 6/9/2014 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/business/20140609/oil-drilling-debate-rages-in-hermosa-beach-as-both-sides-await-studies Another independent health-related study and an analysis of the project’s potential financial impacts are expected by July 22, which is the day the City Council anticipates scheduling the ballot measure for the Nov. 4 election. 51 6/10/2014 The Beach Reporter http://tbrnews.com/news/hermosa_beach/oi l-drilling-debate-rages-in-hermosa-beach- as-both-sides/article_90ec9d30-f0bb-11e3- b4d7-001a4bcf887a.html The primary analysis of the health and environmental impacts in the community and beyond is contained in an 1,800-page final environmental impact report that will be released today on the city’swebsite. Another independent health-related study and an analysis of the project’s potential financial impacts are expected by July 22, which is the day the City Council anticipates 52 6/12/2014 Easy Reader News http://www.easyreadernews.com/84742/ca n-hermosa-learn-huntington/ The city and E&B Natural Resources signed an agreement last year that would allow E&B to call for an election as soon as November to lift Hermosa’s ban on oil drilling. 53 6/28/2014 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/government- and-politics/20140628/hermosa-beachs- city-budget-is-buoyed-by-higher-revenue “A lot of our extra money that we have as a city is going to the oil issue,” Councilwoman Carolyn Petty said. “Once things get past November (when the ballot measure is expected to go before voters), we’re going to have a different financial outlook.” 54 7/9/2014 Daily Breeze http://www.dailybreeze.com/business/2014 0709/hermosa-beach-moves-toward- placing-oil-measure-on-ballot Oil company officials said they felt they got a raw deal from the council, both in the certification of the EIR and movement toward a November vote. “What did we get out of the settlement agreement? We got assignment of the project to us and timing of the election,” Mike Finch, a vice president with the company, told the council Tuesday. “That’s important to us, really, really important to us because that was part of our deal.” But council members said the company was too slow in making its opposition to the Nov. 4 election date known, since E&B 55 7/29/2014 The Bakersfield Californian http://www.bakersfieldcalifornian.com/business/strictly-business/x693652565/Bakersfield-company-hopes-to-revive-oil-drilling-in-Hermosa-Beach An environmental review has begun on a project to drill as many as 30 wells, and an election on the matter could be held next spring, the Los Angeles Times reported. 56 City of Hermosa Beach - Macpherson Lawsuit FAQ's http://www.hermosabch.org/modules/show document.aspx?documentid=1487 It is estimated that the measure will appear on the ballot in early 2013 57 Original HIA 2.0 Screening Page 7 The residents of Hermosa Beach will be voting on whether to lift the ban on oil drilling in November 2014, and will have information from the HIA, EIR and CBA available to help make their decision. 58 City of Hermosa Beach http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?pa ge=744 The City Council will hold a public hearing (anticipated in July 2014) to certify the Final Environmental Impact Report and approve the ballot measure for placement on the November 2014 ballot. 59 Hermosa Oil Recovery http://www.hermosaoilrecovery.com/project- background/project-overview/ Please find more information about the 2014 ballot initiative process on the City of Hermosa Beach website. 1 July 16, 2014 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 2014 OPTIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CERTIFICATION OF AES REDONDO ENERGY PLANT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council; 1. Receive and file the information provided with regard to the AES Power Plant (also known as the “Redondo Beach Energy Project”); 2. Provide direction to Staff regarding the desired level of participation in proceedings before the California Energy Commission related to the project. Discussion: On November 20, 2012, AES Southland, LLC submitted an Application for Certification (AFC) to the California Energy Commission (CEC) seeking permission to construct and operate a power generation facility in Redondo Beach adjacent to the Hermosa Beach border. The proposed power plant is a natural-gas fired, combined-cycle, air-cooled electrical generating facility with a net generating capacity of 496 megawatt (MW), which will replace and be constructed on the site of the AES Redondo Beach Generating Station at 1100 North Harbor Drive, at the intersection of North Harbor Drive and Herondo Street, which serves as the border between Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach. The plant would utilize 10.5 acres in addition to a 2.2 acre existing switchyard located entirely within the approximately 50-acre footprint of the existing Redondo Beach Generating Station and operating power plant. The CEC has exclusive jurisdiction to certify the construction and operation of thermal electric power plants 50 megawatts or larger and all related facilities in the state. In its review, the CEC must determine whether the project will be constructed and operated in conformance with all applicable Laws, Ordinances, Regulations and Standards (LORS). According to the CEC, all interested agencies, organizations, and individuals are encouraged to participate in the “power plant siting process.” The CEC has published a detailed summary of the siting process in its 2006 Public Participation in the Siting 2 Process: Practice and Procedure Guide,1 which generally involves six phases: Prefiling Review Phase: An informal period of planning and preparation before an applicant submits a formal AFC to the CEC. Data Adequacy Phase: CEC staff review is conducted to determine if the AFC is sufficiently complete based on the information required in the CEC's regulations. When the AFC is accepted as "data adequate," the statutory review begins. Discovery Phase: A period of data gathering, public information hearings, workshops and site visits by CEC staff, agencies, and "intervenors." CEC staff prepares and releases an Issue Identification report. Analysis Phase: CEC staff, agencies and participants hold workshops during this phase to analyze the project and its various issues. Staff prepares a Preliminary Staff Assessment, and later, the Final Staff Assessment. A pre- hearing conference is held to set the schedule and organize information and witnesses for formal hearings. The deadline to become an "intervenor" or formal party to the process is in this phase (30-days before the first evidentiary hearing). Hearings Phase: Formal evidentiary hearings are held by the Energy Commission Committee (comprised of two commissioners that are assigned to each siting case) to hear the findings and conclusions of the applicant, staff, intervenors, and other agencies through written, oral and documentary testimony in order to make a decision based on evidence. The public is encouraged to present oral and written comments. Decision Phase: The Energy Commission Committee prepares and issues a Presiding Member's Proposed Decision (PMPD), followed by a public hearing. Subsequently, the full Energy Commission considers whether to approve or deny the AFC at a regularly scheduled bi-monthly business meeting. The AES proceedings are currently in the Analysis Phase. AES’s application was accepted as “data adequate” on August 27, 2013. The CEC has conducted workshops in Redondo Beach and made a presentation to this Council on December 10, 2013 (see attached power point presentation). On June 13, 2014, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) provided its Preliminary Determination of Compliance to the CEC. The SCAQMD is evaluating whether to hold a hearing regarding its Preliminary Determination in response to requests from members of the public. As of the date of this report, Redondo Beach has not submitted a formal response to the SCAQMD Preliminary Determination, but is evaluating whether to do so. The CEC plans to release its Preliminary Staff Assessment on or before July 28, 2014. As of the date of this report, neither a pre-hearing conference nor an evidentiary hearing has been scheduled by the CEC. 1 Available in its entirety at http://energy.ca.gov/2006publications/CEC-700-2006-002/CEC-700-2006- 002.PDF. 3 Project Concerns: The City of Redondo Beach has intervened in the AES proceedings based on its determination that the project will have a significant impact on the health, safety, and welfare of its residents and conflict with city ordinances. In particular, Redondo Beach adopted a moratorium ordinance, which was extended, prohibiting “the approval of any conditional use permit, coastal development permit or any other discretionary City permit or approval for the construction, expansion, replacement, modification or alteration of any facilities for the on-site generation of electricity on any property located within the coastal zone.”2 Redondo Beach is particularly concerned with potential impacts from noise and air pollution, and whether there is in fact a need for the power proposed to be generated from the AES plant. Redondo Beach will provide a presentation during tonight’s meeting further discussing its participation in the AES proceedings. Because the proposed AES plant would be located adjacent to Hermosa Beach, the City may be impacted by the CEC’s decision. Informal communication between the two cities has occurred at the staff and councilmember levels; however, direction is needed to determine whether the City will formally participate in the CEC proceedings and/or formally support or partner with Redondo Beach in the proceedings. Pursuant to the 2014 Strategic Plan, a top management priority is listed as “AES rebuild.” To date, the City has been monitoring the progress of the proceedings, and provided a link on our website to provide information about the project and its status to the public. Otherwise, the Council has neither taken an official position on the project nor provided policy direction on whether the City should participate in CEC proceedings. Because the project will be located in Redondo Beach and is subject to approval by the CEC, expanded participation by the City in the CEC proceedings may have limited impact. Further, in determining the amount of resources the City may want to commit to this process, the City should consider the potential impacts to the City of the proposed plant versus potential impacts from an alternative project, should the proposed plant be denied. The three options available to the City regarding its role in the power plant proceedings are detailed below. Options for Participation: The City may take one of the following courses of action: Option 1: Formal Participation - Intervene If the City desires to formally participate in the CEC proceedings, it may do so as an intervenor. An intervenor becomes a party to the proceeding with the same rights, 2 Redondo Beach Ordinance 3116-13 and 3120-14. 4 responsibilities and obligations as all other parties. Intervenors can testify and present evidence at CEC hearings. Such testimony is given under oath and is afforded more weight when the CEC weighs the facts and decides conflicts in evidence, thus this testimony can be used to support the CEC’s decision. Further, intervenors may present witnesses and cross-examine witnesses from all other parties to strengthen their position. The process to become an intervenor involves filing a petition to intervene. There is no cost to file a petition, which is a brief document explaining why the party believes it should be granted permission to intervene. The deadline to intervene is 30 days before the first evidentiary hearing, which will be scheduled soon after the CEC’s Preliminary Staff Assessment is released. CEC staff expects to release its Preliminary Staff Assessment by July 28, 2014. Petitions to intervene are generally granted. As an intervenor, the City’s comments and testimony would be given the weight of evidence; therefore, the City may need to commit staff time, hire technical consultants, and invest other resources to establish evidence of impacts from the proposed plant. Further, the City will incur legal costs in connection with preparation of briefs and other documents filed with the CEC. However, Redondo Beach has identified consultants available to assist in analyzing potential impacts, which it has offered to make available to reduce the City’s potential costs of participation. Further, becoming an intervenor does not necessarily require that the City incur these additional costs—it merely preserves the City’s right to fully participate in the proceedings at a greater level than a member of the public. The City could become an intervenor and then choose not to testify; or only testify and submit material in support of Redondo Beach, relying on evidence established by Redondo Beach’s experts; or fully participate as a separate party, including establishing its own evidence of potential impacts from the project on the City. As such, the City’s costs of participating as an intervenor would be commensurate with its level of involvement. Option 2: Informal Participation – Public Comment Any member of the public may attend all meetings, workshops and hearings related to the AFC, and may provide oral and/or written comments to the CEC. Those comments become part of the record but are not sufficient to support the decision of the CEC because they do not have the formal weight of evidence. Even if the City’s comments are not afforded the weight of formal evidence, they would be more meaningful if supported by data or the opinion of technical experts. However, since consulting with experts will require some investment of City resources and may reveal significant impacts of the project, the City may wish to intervene to preserve its ability to present evidence during the course of the proceedings. Option 3: Continue to Monitor the Proceedings C lif i E C i iCalifornia Energy CommissionREDONDO BEACH ENERGY PROJECTPOWER PLANT LICENSINGHermosa Beach City CouncilyDecember 10, 2013Roger Johnson, Deputy DirectorSiting, Transmission and Environmental Protection Division6 TOPICS TO BE PRESENTEDTOPICS TO BE PRESENTEDAES Redondo Beach project–AES project objectives–Project DescriptionProject Description–Project Visual SimulationsEnergy Commission AFC process–Permitting Authority–Environmental Review–Decision Process–CompliancePublic Participation7 R d d B h P j t Obj tiRedondo Beach Project ObjectivesModernize a 60 year old plantRemove existing facility and free up nearly 75% ofRemove existing facility and free up nearly 75% of site for alternative useCreate a sustainable business that supports ppCalifornia in achieving its clean energy and environmental goalsHelp minimize consumer electricity costs8 Rd d B hE P j tRedondo Beach Energy ProjectRBEP is a proposed natural‐gas fired, combined‐cycle, air‐cooled, 511‐megawatt (MW) gross electrical generating facility that would replace the existing andgenerating facility that would replace the existing and still operational AES Redondo Beach Generating Station. The existing Redondo Beach Generating Station Units 1 through 8 and auxiliary boiler no. 17 will be demolished as part of the projectdemolished as part of the project.9 Eiti Pl tSitExisting Plant Site10 PdMditiPjtProposed Modernization Project11 PdMditiPjtProposed Modernization Project12 Existing Plant SiteExisting Plant SiteView from Herondo Street13 Proposed Modernization ProjectProposed Modernization ProjectView from Herondo Street14 Existing Plant SiteExisting Plant SiteView from PCH and Herondo, looking southwest15 Proposed Modernization ProjectProposed Modernization ProjectView from PCH and Herondo, looking southwest16 Existing Plant SiteExisting Plant SiteView from Moonstone Park, looking east17 Proposed Modernization ProjectProposed Modernization ProjectView from Moonstone Park, looking east18 Existing Plant SiteExisting Plant SiteView from Broadway and Beryl19 Existing Plant SiteExisting Plant SiteView from Broadway and Beryl20 Existing Plant SiteExisting Plant SiteView from 700 Block Irena21 Proposed Modernization ProjectProposed Modernization ProjectView from 700 Block Irena22 Existing Plant SiteExisting Plant SiteView from Hermosa Beach23 Proposed Modernization ProjectProposed Modernization ProjectView from Hermosa Beach24 Existing Plant SiteExisting Plant SiteView from Hermosa Beach Pier25 Proposed Modernization ProjectProposed Modernization ProjectView from Hermosa Beach Pier26 ECii’RlEnergy Commission’s RoleEnergy Commission permitting authority–State-wide permit consistency–Thermal power plant 50 megawatts or greaterpp g g–Related facilitiestransmission lineswater supply systemsnatural gas pipelineswaste disposal facilitiesaccess roadsN t ti ll d til it i i d–No construction allowed until permit is issuedLead state agency for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)27 Energy Commission’s PermittingEnergy Commission s Permitting ProcessFive Commissioners appointed by the Governor and approved by the Senate for 5-year terms.Committee of two Commissioners assigned toCommittee of two Commissioners assigned to oversee a power plant licensing proceedingStaff is independent party to the proceeding like the applicant and intervenorsOpen transparent process with multiple public workshops and hearings in the communityworkshops and hearings in the communityExparte rule between parties and commissionersPublic Adviser appointed by the Governor28Public Adviser appointed by the Governor Local State and Federal CoordinationLocal, State and Federal CoordinationStaff works closely with local, state and federal agencies for example:agencies, for example:–LocalCity of Redondo BeachLos Angeles CountyLos Angeles CountySouthern California Association of GovernmentsSouth Coast Air Quality Management DistrictSt t–StateLos Angeles Regional Water Quality Control BoardCalifornia Department of Fish and WildlifeC lif i C t l C i iCalifornia Coastal Commission–FederalUS Army Corps of Engineers29US Fish and Wildlife Service US Environmental Protection Agency OifthLi iP1.PrefilingOverview of the Licensing ProcessStaff meets with local agency and developer to explain permit process and application requirements2.Filing and Data AdequacyDeveloper files Application for Certification and feeMinimum requirements to accept application3.Discovery and AnalysesIssues Identification Report/Information Hearing & Site VisitData requests/responses workshopsIssue Resolution WorkshopsStaff Assessments4.Evidentiary Hearings and DecisionCommittee holds evidentiary hearings30Committee produces Proposed DecisionDecision by full Commission 31 Did A l PDiscovery and Analyses ProcessIntervenorsPublicPublic Adviser*CEC StaffStaff Assessment/TestimonyFederal AgenciesLocal, State, &Federal AgenciesApplicant32* The Public Adviser provides assistance on how to participate in the CEC’s public process. St ff’ I d d t A tStaff’s Independent Assessment• Air Quality • Alternatives Bi l• Environmental Justice Hazardous• Transmission Line Engineering• Biology • Cultural Resources •Hazardous Materials •Land UseEngineering• Transmission Line Safety • Efficiency • Facility DesignElectrical• Noise • Public Health Reliability• Traffic • Visual •Waste - Electrical - Mechanical - Structural •Reliability• Safety •Socioeconomics•Waste• Water 33 - Civil • Soils/Paleo Plii StffA tPreliminary Staff AssessmentDetermine if proposal complies with Laws, Ordinances, Regulations, Standards (LORS)Conduct engineering and environmental analysisConduct engineering and environmental analysis–identify issues–evaluate alternatives–identify mitigation measures–recommend conditions of certificationFacilitate public and agency participationFacilitate public and agency participationPreliminary Staff Assessment filed for 30-day comment period34Public workshop(s) on PSA Fi l St ff A tFinal Staff AssessmentAddress comments on PSARevise PSA as appropriate and file FSA as expert witness testimony for evidentiary hearingswitness testimony for evidentiary hearings35 What Happens after the Final StaffWhat Happens after the Final Staff Assessment?Committee holds Prehearing ConferenceCommittee holds Prehearing ConferenceCommittee issues schedule for Evidentiary HearingsgCommittee hears sworn testimony from staff, applicant and intervenorsCommittee takes public comments36 Evidentiary Hearings & Decision ProcessEvidentiary Hearings & Decision ProcessIntervenortestimonyPubliccommentPublic AdviserCommitteeProposed DecisionApplicantStaff Full CommissionFinal DecisiontestimonyTestimonyLocal, state, &Local, state, &federal agencies37comment Wh t H Aft H i ?What Happens After Hearings?Committee issues Presiding Member’s ProposedCommittee issues Presiding Member’s Proposed Decision (PMPD) for 30-day comment period–Contains findings relating toenvironmental impacts, public health, engineeringproject compliance with LORS–Recommends conditions of certification–Determines if override findings are needed–Recommends whether or not to approve the projectCommittee issues Revised PMPDCommittee issues Revised PMPDFull commission makes decision30-day period to appeal decision to Commission3830day period to appeal decision to Commission and State Supreme Court COMMITTEE SCHEDULECOMMITTEE SCHEDULEREDONDO BEACH ENERGY PROJECTAFC filed 11/20/12AFC filed 11/20/12Data Adequate 08/27/13Information hearing and site visit 10/01/13Information hearing and site visit 10/01/131stIssue resolution workshop 12/5/13Determination of Compliance (PDOC) 01/2014?Prelim Staff Assessment (PSA) PDOC + 45 daysPSA workshop PSA + 15 daysPSA comment period PSA + 30 daysFinal DOC – PDOC + 60 daysFi l St ff A tFDOC + 45 d39Final Staff Assessment -FDOC + 45 days Cli MitiCompliance MonitoringEnergy Commission staff oversee projectEnergy Commission staff oversee project compliance from preconstruction through closure.Energy Commission is Chief Building Official butEnergy Commission is Chief Building Official but will use third party CBO for plan checks.Monthly Compliance reports are posted to the yp p pEnergy Commission web site during construction.Annual Compliance reports are posted to the ECiibidi iEnergy Commission web site during operation.40 WThPbliMPtiitWays The Public May ParticipateSign up for the project list serve http://www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/redondo_beach/Attend public workshops and hearings andAttend public workshops and hearings and provide oral comments E-file or submit written comments or statements to the Staff or CommissionersProvide written comments on the Preliminary Staff Assessment and Proposed DecisionStaff Assessment and Proposed DecisionBecome a formal intervenor41 More InformationMore InformationCalifornia Energy Commission–Roger Johnson, Deputy Director for Siting, Transmission and Environmental Protection(916) 654-5100; e-mail: rjohnson@energy.state.ca.usChris Davis Siting Office Manager–Chris Davis, Siting Office Manager(916) 654-4842; e-mail: cdavis@energy.state.ca.us –Alana Mathews, Public Adviser(916) 654-4489 or (800) 822-6228(916) 6544489 or (800) 8226228,e-mail: PAO@energy.state.ca.usDocuments are available for public review at:Energy Commission Web site:www energy ca gov/sitingcases–Energy Commission Web site: www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases–Public Libraries (Redondo Beach, Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach, Torrance, Rancho Palos Verdes)–Dockets Unit at the Energy Commission42–Dockets Unit at the Energy Commission 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: July 21, 2014 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Ken Robertson, Director, Community Development Department Subject: Item 6(a) - Supplemental - Redondo Beach Written Comments in Response to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Preliminary Determination of Compliance (PDOC) for the AES Redondo Beach Energy Project As noted in the staff report, Redondo Beach had not determined as of last week whether they would formally respond to the SCAQMD’s preliminary determination of the power plant’s compliance with air quality standards. Attached are Redondo Beach’s responses submitted to SCAQM at the end of last week. DOCKETED Docket Number:12-AFC-03 Project Title:Redondo Beach Energy Project TN #:202756 Document Title:City of Redondo Beach's Comments on AQMD's PDOC Description:Comments on Preliminary Determination of Compliance Filer:Jon Welner Organization:City of Redondo Beach (outside counsel) Submitter Role:Intervenor Representative Submission Date:7/18/2014 2:32:27 PM Docketed Date:7/18/2014 C1 3 SURVEYOR,PRIOR TO CITY OF REDONDO BEACH PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. MONUMENTS AND FILE A FINAL RECORD OF SURVEY WITH THE COUNTY DISTURBED, THE PROJECT SURVEYOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO RE-ESTABLISH SAID BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE. IF EXISTING SURVEY MONUMEN(S ARE BE FILED WITH THE COUNTY SURVEYOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AREA, A RECORD OF SURVEY SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.IF EXISTING MONUMENTS ARE PRESENT WITHIN THE AROUND THE SITE HAVE NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED AND MUST BE IDENTIFIED BY RECORD INFORMATION ONLY. ALL EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS ON OR THE ESTIMATE OF 16 MONUMENTS TO BE DISTURBED ARE BASED ON LOCATIONS STREET IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND QUANTITIES CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND QUANTITIES CONT. WELCOME PLAZA DEMOLITION / REMOVAL NOTES WELCOME PLAZA GRADING AND PAVING CONSTRUCTION NOTES WELCOME PLAZA SIGNING & STRIPING NOTES WELCOME PLAZA LIGHTING NOTES WELCOME PLAZA DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND QUANTITIES CONT. SEE SHEET LS-1 FOR LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION ITEMS TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES SIGNING AND STRIPING CONSTRUCTION NOTES STREET IMPROVEMENT DISPOSITION NOTES ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES SURVEY MONUMENT NOTE AND QUANTITIES CONSTRUCTION NOTES DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH S38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATE 06/26/2014 7"-8" AB PAVEMENT EXIST 6"-8"AC/ BEACH) HERMOSA (CITY OF 7"-8" AB PAVEMENT EXIST 6"-8"AC/ 29’ 29’ LC N.T.S. NORTH HARBOR DRIVE STATION 11+35.90 TO STA 23+47.82 EXIST R/W 10’2’ EXIST R/W TO 3 .0% VAR . 1 .5% & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB AT BULB 2’ MIN 10’ TYP 14’ PLANS SEE LANDSCAPE 11 101 6 6 2A 17 1A 29’ 29’ LC N.T.S. NORTH HARBOR DRIVE STATION 23+47.82 TO STA 29+00.00 EXIST R/W 10’2’ EXIST R/W TO 3 .0% VAR . 1 .5% & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB AT BULB 2’ MIN 10’ TYP 14’ PLANS SEE LANDSCAPE 11 102 6 6 2A 17 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB 11 6 6 17 5" AB PAVEMENT EXIST 5"AC/ 6" AB PAVEMENT EXIST 6"AC/ 5"-6" AB PAVEMENT EXIST 6"-8"AC/ 5"-6" AB PAVEMENT EXIST 6"AC/ 5"-7" AB PAVEMENT EXIST 5"AC/ 5"-6" AB PAVEMENT EXIST 6"-7"AC/ N.T.S. STATION 30+00.00 TO 36+86.54 11 6 6 175"-6" AB PAVEMENT EXIST 7"-8"AC/ 5’TYP AT BULB 13’ MAX 5’TYP AT BULB 13’ MAX CL N.T.S. EXIST R/W 7’ EXIST R/W 9’43’41’ 50’50’ HERONDO STREET CL N.T.S. EXIST R/W EXIST R/W 8’42’42’ 50’50’ HERONDO STREET STATION 30+00 TO 35+50 8’ 35’35’ MATCH EXISTVARIES MATCH EXIST VARIES STATION 35+50 TO 43+50 MATCH EXISTVARIES MATCH EXIST VARIES 7’7’ 8’6’35’35’ C2 4 TO 3 .0% VAR . 1 .5% 29’ CL 29’ 5’14’ EXIST R/W 10’ EXIST R/W 2’-6’ VARIES N.T.S. NORTH HARBOR DRIVE STATION 36+86.54 TO 42+98.15 & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB CURB & GUTTER EXIST 6" MEDIAN CURB & GUTTER EXIST 6" MEDIAN & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB CURB & GUTTER EXIST 6" MEDIAN CURB & GUTTER EXIST 6" MEDIAN 2 2 10 11 2A 6 6 177"-8" AB PAVEMENT EXIST 6"-8"AC/ CONSTRUCTION NOTES 6 10 11 17 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC STD NO 120-2, W=18" CONSTRUCT 6" CURB ONLY TYPE A1-6 PER SPPWC STD NO 120-2 5"-6" AB PAVEMENT EXIST 5"-6"AC/ WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 OVER 3" OF B2-PG-64-10 REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH EXIST FINISHED SURFACE 2 2A 4 TYPICAL SECTIONS BEACH) HERMOSA (CITY OF BEACH) HERMOSA (CITY OF 1 1A SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 OVER 3" OF B2-PG-64-10 REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH EXIST FINISHED WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 OVER 3" OF B2-PG-64-10 (CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH) REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH EXIST FINISHED SURFACE 29’ 14’ 29’ LC N.T.S. NORTH HARBOR DRIVE STATION 29+00.00 TO STA 30+00.00 EXIST R/W EXIST R/W 10’ 5’-13’ VARIES 2’-10’ VARIES 2’ TO 3 .0% VAR . 1 .5% & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB 7"-8" AB PAVEMENT EXIST 6"-8"AC/ 6 6 10 11 2A 2 17 TO 3 .0% VAR . 1 .5% 29’ CL NORTH HARBOR DRIVE 29’ 5’14’10’ EXIST R/W 10’ EXIST R/W 2’-6’ VARIES 2 10 2A SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 OVER PETROMAT FABRIC REMOVE 2" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH EXIST FINISHED PAVEMENT DEPTH. CONSTRUCT BETWEEN 1"-4" C2-PG-64-10 AC. DEPTH TO MATCH ADJACENT 10’ SPPWC STD 112-2. COLOR EASTERN TAN BY DAVIS. CONSTRUCT 4" CONCRETE MEDIAN PAVING. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PER PETROMAT FABRIC WITH 1.5" OF COLORED C2-PG-64-10 OVER 1.5" OF B2-PG-64-10 OVER REMOVE PAVEMENT TO 3" BELOW PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACE AND REPLACE DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH S38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATE 06/26/2014 CL N.T.S. EXIST R/W EXIST R/W 44’ 50’50’ HERONDO STREET 7’37’ MATCH EXISTVARIES MATCH EXIST VARIES 37’ 44’6’6’ 7’ STATION 43+50 TO 52+50 28’ CL N.T.S. NORTH HARBOR DRIVE STATION 42+98.15 TO 44+14.16 29’ 10’14’ 4’ 11’6’ EXIST R/W EXIST R/W TO 3 .0% VAR . 1 .5% PLANS SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS SEE LANDSCAPE CURB & GUTTER EXIST 6" MEDIAN & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB CURB & GUTTER EXIST 6" MEDIAN 2A BEACH) HERMOSA (CITY OF & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB 10 & GUTTER EXIST 6" CURB 31+009+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00(ABAND.)ECSD SD SCALE: HORIZ. 1"=40’ VERT. 1"=4’ DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH SAPPROVED BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: DATE 38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATEDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FRANK SENTENO, 06/26/2014 (5’ EAST OF C/L) AT CROWN LINE EXISTING FINISHED SURFACE RIGHT CURB EXISTING 6" RIGHT CURB EXISTING 6" RIGHT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN RIGHT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN RIGHT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB EXISTING 6" LEFT CURB EXISTING 6"11+00.00(13.10) TC12+00.00(12.60) TC13+00.00(12.35) TC14+00.00(12.26) TC15+00.00(12.14) TC16+00.00(12.00) TC17+00.00(11.80) TC18+00.00(11.51) TC19+00.00(11.54) TC9+26.35(13.07) TC10+00.00(13.28) TC11+00.00(12.70) TC12+00.00(12.17) TC13+00.00(11.85) TC14+00.00(11.87) TC15+00.00(11.83) TC16+00.00(11.40) TC17+00.00(11.35) TC18+00.00(11.22) TC19+00.00(10.91) TC11+88.34 EC12.75 TC12+70.30 BC12.44 TC17+72.96 EC11.67 TC18+39.18 BC11.53 TC11+88.34 BC12.81 TC12+70.30 EC12.72 TC17+75.55 PCC18+37.85 EC16+49.60 GB11.95 TC12.40 TC12.27 TC12.14 TC12.01 TC11.83 TC11.40 TC13+30.30ANGLE POINT12.62 TC13+38.30ANGLE POINT12.60 TC17+34.35 BC17+42.35 PCC17+50.35 EC17+59.35 BC18+51.02 BC18+62.36 PCC18+70.36 EC-0.59% -0.18%-0.14% -0.12% -0.16%12.67 TC12.53 TC12.42 TC12.30 TC11.71 TC12+08.46 BCR12.12 TC12+44.97 ECR11.84 TC12+10.05 ECR12.53 TC12+58.57 BCR12.38 TC11+49.29 EC13.04 TC11+49.29 BC12.95 TC-0.50% -0.13% -0.22% -0.22%19+00.0017+00.0016+00.0015+00.0014+00.0013+00.0013+00.0014+00.0015+00.0016+00.0019+00.0012.14 TC12.30 TC12.33 TC12.31 TC12.10 TC11.99 TC12.03 TC11.94 TC11.76 TC12+00.0013+00.0014+00.0015+00.0016+00.0017+00.0018+00.0019+00.0020+00.00 GB(11.24) TC20+00.00(10.57) TC20+00.0011.18 TC20+00.00 GB11.55 TC20+00.00 GB12.18 TC17+00.0011+00.0010+00.00(13.30) FS(13.93) FS(12.67) FS(12.36) FS(12.35) FS(12.17) FS(12.00) FS(11.94) FS(11.71) FS(11.43) FS(11.22) FS(SEE SHEET C4)MATCHLINE - STA. 20+0010+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 (SEE SHEET C4)MATCHLINE - STA. 20+001 inch = 40 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 20 40 80 16040 GRAPHIC SCALE STA 10+00.00 YACHT CLUB WAY STA 12+33.41 NORTH HARBOR DR CL INT NORTH HARBOR DRIVECITY OF HERMOSA BEACHCITY OF REDONDO BEACHCITY BOUNDARYCURVE DATA 2 3 4 5 9 50.00’9.59’4.81’ 5.00’3.93’2.07’ 1.00’2.36’2.41’ 10.00’ 5.00’10.00’9.27’ 25.00’ 9.27’5.00’ 17.61’9.19’ 4.00’9.75’10.88’ 4.00’11.21’23.32’ 10.00’12.67’7.35’ 10.00’9.27’5.00’ 510.92’ RTSTA 10+87.18 BC10.00’ RTSTA 10+96.71 EC15.00’ RTSTA 11+88.34 EC10.0’ RTSTA 12+70.30 EC15.00’ RTSTA 12+70.30 BC10.00’ RTSTA 17+34.35 BC2.00’ RTSTA 17+50.35 EC2.00’ RTSTA 17+59.35 BC7.95’ RTSTA 17+75.55 PCC15.00’ RTSTA 17+72.96 EC15.00’ RTSTA 18+39.18 BC7.23’ RTSTA 18+37.85 EC2.57’ RTSTA 18+51.02 BC10.00’ RTSTA 18+70.36 ECDISPOSITION NOTES PROTECT IN PLACE ADJUST TO GRADE A B C REMOVE MATCHLINE - STA. 30+57.90 EC (SEE SHEET C7) STA. 30+51.66 BC MATCHLINE - C 1 8 7 12 13 11 13 1 C 10 9 116HERONDO STREET10 20 0 30 10 20 30 0 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 15 YACHT CLUB WAY10 6AND BEGIN CURBEND CURB AND GUTTER 6.00’ RTSTA 17+42.35 PCC11 C 6 6 6 6 5.0’29.0’14.0’6.0’29.0’12 OTHERS DWY BY PROPOSED 5’ EAST OF C/L PROP CROWNLINE END CURB15.00’ RTSTA 11+30.24N1768957.63,E6440999.50 STA 10+00.00 NORTH HARBOR DR COUNTY BOUNDARY N1768939.39,E6441007.80 STA 30+00.00 HERONDO ST STA 10+20.03 NORTH HARBOR DR CL INT JOIN EXIST29.11’ RTSTA 9+93.77ANGLE POINT12 12 1010.00’ RTSTA 11+37.63 BC10.00’ RTSTA 11+49.29 EC13.29’ RTSTA 11+49.29 BC15.00’ RTSTA 11+42.29 EC10.00’ RTSTA 11+88.34 BC66.0’AND GUTTEREND CURB, BEGIN CURB 6.00’ RTSTA 18+62.36 PCC11.46’ RTSTA 11+41.17 EC11.71’ RTSTA 11+43.00 BC1059’27" 2 4500’00" 13500’00" 4 5 1.00’3.14’18000’00" 6 1.00’3.14’18000’00" 7 4.00’12.57’18000’00" 8 - 13 12 11 10 1 12 STREET IMPROVEMENT STA 9+71.56 TO STA 20+00.00 N. HARBOR DRIVE BEGIN PROJECT STA 9+71.56 1 6 1414 1414 141414 PAVEMENT AC/AB ANGLE POINTSTA 13+30.30ANGLE POINTSTA 13+38.3012 12 PAVEMENT AC/AB 161616161616161616161616 16 NO.R L T 18 2A 17 17 18 12 11 16CL STA 11+34.13CL STA 10+87CL STA 11+54CL STA 12+73.80CL STA 13+45CL STA 13+60.35CL STA 14+04.35CL STA 14+48.35CL STA 14+92.35CL STA 15+36.35CL STA 15+80.35CL STA 16+24.35CL STA 16+68.35CL STA 17+12.35CL STA 18+92.36CL STA 19+36.36CL STA 19+80.36CL STA 14+64CL STA 16+07CL STA 17+25CL STA 18+68CL STA 19+67CL STA 13+89CL STA 15+11CL STA 16+45CL STA 17+72CL STA 19+12C3 B B B PER SPPWC STD NO 120-2, W=18" CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER TYPE A2-6 SPPWC STD NO 120-2 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB ONLY TYPE A1-6 PER STD NO 151-2 CONSTRUCT PARKWAY DRAIN, S=2’ PER SPPWC DETAIL J ON DWG. NO. C17 4’ X 6’ MEDIAN PLANTER BLOCKOUT PER - - NO.R L T 14A14A 14A 14A 14A 14A 17A17A SIZE AND NUMBER. TRENCH AS NEEDED. SEE IRRIGATION PLANS FOR CONSTRUCT IRRIGATION SLEEVES. REPAIR 11 11 10 6 6A WELCOME PLAZA SHEET NO C13 SEE DEMOLITION PLAN A A 10 11 14A 14 15 16 17 18 12 1A 5 5 17 20 L=15’ 21 PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. WITH CITY ENGINEER AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND LENGTH STD NO 120-2. LIMITS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. REPLACE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC 21 21 21 L=6.7’ 21 L=20’ 21 L=40’ 22 PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. WITH CITY ENGINEER AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND LENGTH NO 112-2. LIMITS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONSTRUCT 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER SPPWC STD GUTTER, TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC STD NO 120-2. REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY. REPLACE CURB AND 20 PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. WITH CITY ENGINEER AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND LENGTH NO 120-2. LIMITS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. REPLACE CURB ONLY, TYPE A1-6 PER SPPWC STD DRAWING No. C9 AND C10 111-5 (TYPE PER PLAN) AND PER DETAILS CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER SPPWC STD NO 1"=40’ DWG. NO. C17, C18, E1 AND E2 MAST ARM LED LUMINAIRE PER DETAIL N ON REPLACE STREET LIGHT POLE WITH SINGLE RAMP #1 RAMP #2 RAMP #4 RAMP #9 TO STA 11+25FR STA 11+10TO STA 15+30.00FR STA 12+67.93L=262.07’TO STA 13+22.30FR STA 12+67.2811 TO STA 13+52.00FR STA 13+45.30L=55.02’TO STA 14+90.00FR STA 14+70.0022TO STA 15+51.99FR STA 15+28.00TO STA 16+05.00FR STA 15+65.00L=23.99’ RAMP #8 RAMP #7& ON SHEET C12 GRIND AND OVERLAY AT JOIN PER DETAIL C18, E1 AND E2 LUMINAIRE PER DETAIL N ON DWG. NO. C17, INSTALL DOUBLE MAST ARM STREET LIGHT LED REMOVE EXIST STREET LIGHT AND IN MEDIAN CPAVERS PAVERS C 2B 2B CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONT’D 2A 17A STD 112-2. COLOR EASTERN TAN BY DAVIS. MEDIAN PAVING EXPANSION JOINTS PER SPPWC CONSTRUCT 12" WIDE AND 4" THICK CONCRETE 2A 1A C2-PG-64-10 OVER 3" OF B2-PG-64-10 MATCH EXIST FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO RAMP #6 RAMP #5 & #3 RAMP 6 6A MH SEWER B SEWER MH VALVE WATER UNITS1, LINE PROJECT NO. 1105, EXISTING LACFCD DEPTH TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVEMENT DEPTH. CONSTRUCT BETWEEN 1"-4" C2-PG-64-10 AC. (CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH) DEPTH TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVEMENT DEPTH. CONSTRUCT BETWEEN 1"-4" C2-PG-64-10 AC. EASTERN TAN BY DAVIS. JOINTS SHALL BE PER SPPWC STD 112-2. COLOR CONSTRUCT 4" CONCRETE MEDIAN PAVING. EXPANSION PETROMAT FABRIC C2-PG-64-10 OVER 1.5" OF B2-PG-64-10 OVER SURFACE AND REPLACE WITH 1.5" OF COLORED REMOVE PAVEMENT TO 3" BELOW PROPOSED FINISHED PETROMAT FABRIC C2-PG-64-10 OVER 1.5" OF B2-PG-64-10 OVER FINISHED SURFACE AND REPLACE WITH 1.5" OF REMOVE PAVEMENT TO 3" BELOW PROPOSED OVER 3" OF B2-PG-64-10 (CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH) EXIST FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH PMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMFPPMFPPMPMPMPMPM20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 SCALE: HORIZ. 1"=40’ VERT. 1"=4’ DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH S38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATE 06/26/2014 (5’ EAST OF C/L) AT CROWN LINE EXISTING FINISHED SURFACE RIGHT CURB EXISTING 6"RIGHT CURB EXISTING 6" RIGHT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN RIGHT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN RIGHT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB PROP 6" MEDIANLEFT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB EXISTING 6" LEFT CURB EXISTING 6"21+00.00(11.12) TC22+00.00(10.94) TC23+00.00(10.87) TC24+00.00(10.68) TC25+00.00(10.47) TC26+00.00(11.09) TC27+00.00(11.45) TC28+00.00(12.01) TC29+00.00(12.65) TC21+00.00(10.67) TC22+00.00(10.47) TC24+00.00(10.11) TC25+00.00(9.84) TC26+00.00(10.36) TC27+00.00(10.89) TC28+00.00(11.56) TC29+00.00(12.25) TC22+33.30 EC10.80 TC23+55.99 BC10.72 TC26+48.72 PCC11.21 TC27+00.42 BC11.50 TC29+32.57 EC12.84 TC29+90.98 BC13.05 TC22+33.30 BC23+54.89 PCC26+51.32 PCC11.80 TC26+99.41 EC12.02 TC29+35.16 PCC13.21 TC29+89.97 EC13.35 TC25+29.68 EC10.59 TC26+00.00 GB10.94 TC25+10.00 GB10.49 TC11.02 TC10.86 TC10.65 TC12.08 TC12.66 TC21+47.95 BC21+65.82 EC21+12.36 BC21+20.36 PCC21+28.36 EC21+79.02 BC21+87.95 EC26+17.72 PCC26+25.72 PCC11.67 TC26+33.67 PCC11.74 TC23+97.72 EC23+90.12 PCC23+82.52 PCC25+29.68 BC27+18.06 BC12.15 TC27+29.39 PCC12.18 TC27+37.39 EC12.05 TC28+91.39 BC12.95 TC28+99.39 PCC13.17 TC29+07.39 EC13.24 TC29+18.97 BC13.28 TC24+75.00 GB-0.18%-0.32%-0.26%0.36%0.51% 0.59%12.41 TC22+34.70 BCR10.08 TC23+47.82 ECR10.19 TC22+17.54 ECR10.90 TC22+58.54 BCR10.71 TC-0.16%-0.15%0.50%0.56% 0.58%28+00.0029+00.0024+00.0021+00.0022+00.0028+00.0011.35 TC11.54 TC11.63 TC11.55 TC11.41 TC11.25 TC11.18 TC11.04 TC11.04 TC11.17 TC11.12 TC11.03 TC10.83 TC11.03 TC11.48 TC20+00.00 GB21+00.0022+00.0023+00.0024+00.0028+00.00(12.63) TC30+00.0020+00.00(11.24) TC(12.73) TC30+00.00(10.57) TC20+00.0011.18 TC20+00.00 GB11.55 TC20+00.00 GB27+00.0026+00.0025+00.0029+00.00(13.14) FS30+00.00(12.72) FS(12.14) FS(11.58) FS(11.07) FS(10.65) FS(11.22) FS(11.21) FS(10.91) FS(10.76) FS(10.68) FS20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 (SEE SHEET C5)MATCHLINE - STA. 30+001 inch = 40 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 20 40 80 16040 GRAPHIC SCALEMATCHLINE - STA. 20+00(SEE SHEET C3)MATCHLINE - STA. 20+00(SEE SHEET C3)NO.R L T CURVE DATA 12 10 11 NORTH HARBOR DRIVE 6 -5.30’ RTSTA 21+65.82 EC2.00’ RTSTA 21+47.95 BC2.00’ RTSTA 21+28.36 EC6.00’ RTSTA 21+20.36 PCC10.00’ RTSTA 21+12.36 BC10.35’ RTSTA 21+79.02 BC12.00’ RTSTA 21+87.95 EC11.33’ RTSTA 23+54.89 PCC3.00’ RTSTA 23+82.52 PCC6.50’ RTSTA 23+90.12 PCC10.00’ RTSTA 23+97.72 EC10.00’ RTSTA 25+29.68 BC10.00’ RTSTA 26+17.72 PCC5.98’ RTSTA 26+25.72 PCC2.00’ RTSTA 26+33.67 PCC7.96’ RTSTA 26+51.32 PCC15.00’ RTSTA 26+48.72 EC15.01’ RTSTA 27+00.42 BC9.18’ RTSTA 26+99.41 EC2.57’ RTSTA 27+18.06 BC6.00’ RTSTA 27+29.39 PCC10.00’ RTSTA 27+37.39 EC10.00’ RTSTA 28+91.39 BC6.00’ RTSTA 28+99.39 PCC2.00’ RTSTA 29+07.39 EC2.00’ RTSTA 29+18.97 BC7.95’ RTSTA 29+35.16 PCC15.00’ RTSTA 29+32.57 EC15.00’ RTSTA 23+55.99 BC15.00’ RTSTA 25+29.68 BCNO.R L T CURVE DATA 22 23 21 20 19 18 17 16 14 13 10.00’9.27’5.00’ 10.00’9.27’5.00’ 50.00’18.26’9.23’ 25.00’9.13’4.62’ 1.50’4.71’ 2.00’5.11’6.63’ 50.00’29.28’15.08’ 10.00’8.63’4.61’ 10.00’8.63’4.61’ 1960.00’88.50’44.26’ 1965.00’119.96’60.00’ 10.00’9.31’5.03’ 10.00’9.23’4.97’ 25.00’17.53’9.14’ 4.00’9.73’10.82’ 3.00’8.41’17.49’ 10.00’12.67’7.35’ 10.00’9.27’5.00’ 10.00’9.27’5.00’ 10.00’9.27’ 4.00’9.75’ 25.00’17.61’9.19’ 10.88’ 5.00’ 1950.00’175.24’87.68’15.00’ RTSTA 29+90.97 BC9.17’RTSTA 29+89.97 EC24 3.00’8.41’17.49’MARINA WAYSTA 27+04.91 EC2A 2 17 14 15 13 18 20 19 22 21 23 7 6 2 1 4 3 5 8 9 11 12 10 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 30 10 0 20 30 DISPOSITION NOTES PROTECT IN PLACE ADJUST TO GRADE A B C REMOVE 15 15 15 (SEE SHEET C5)MATCHLINE - STA. 30+0070.0’39.0’31.0’CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1 11 610 11 2A 11 6 6 6 610 1 C4 1A 2B 2A 2A C C 5’ EAST OF C/L PROP CROWNLINE 5’ EAST OF C/L PROP CROWNLINE STREET IMPROVEMENT STA 20+00.00 TO STA 30+00.00 N. HARBOR DRIVE 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 6 PAVEMENT AC/AB PAVEMENT AC/AB 16 16 16 16161616 16 16CL STA 20+24.36CL STA 20+68.36CL STA 24+41.72CL STA 24+85.72CL STA 25+29.72CL STA 25+73.68CL STA 27+81.39CL STA 28+25.39CL STA 28+69.3914 14 14 14 1414 14 CL STA 20+40CL STA 21+71CL STA 25+60CL STA 26+77CL STA 27+93CL STA 29+14CL STA 28+56CL STA 27+34CL STA 26+20CL STA 24+99CL STA 22+32CL STA 21+75CL STA 21+0012 12 12 12 12 18 18 17 17 STD NO 120-2 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB ONLY TYPE A1-6 PER SPPWC SPPWC STD NO 120-2, W=18" CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER TYPE A2-6 PER 12.00’ RTSTA 22+33.30 BC15.0’ RTSTA 22+33.30 EC16 24 15 1.58’0.79’ 25 002’47"1952.00’ 14A 14A 14A 14A 14A 14A 14ACL STA 29+912 2A 14A NO 151-2 CONSTRUCT PARKWAY DRAIN, S=2’ PER SPPWC STD 17A 17A 17A 17A 17A 17A NEEDED. SEE IRRIGATION PLANS FOR SIZE AND NUMBER. CONSTRUCT IRRIGATION SLEEVES. REPAIR TRENCH AS 17 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 20 L=12’ PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. WITH CITY ENGINEER AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND LENGTH NO 112-2. LIMITS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONSTRUCT 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER SPPWC STD GUTTER, TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC STD NO 120-2. REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY. REPLACE CURB AND 22 L=20’ 21 PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. WITH CITY ENGINEER AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND LENGTH STD NO 120-2. LIMITS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. REPLACE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. WITH CITY ENGINEER AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND LENGTH NO 120-2. LIMITS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. REPLACE CURB ONLY, TYPE A1-6 PER SPPWC STD PER PLAN) AND PER DETAILS DRAWING No. C9 AND C10 CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER SPPWC STD NO 111-5 (TYPE 1"=40’ DETAIL N ON DWG. NO. C17, C18, E1 & E2 DOUBLE MAST ARM STREET LIGHT LED LUMINAIRE PER REMOVE EXIST STREET LIGHT AND IN MEDIAN INSTALL DWG. NO. C17 4’ X 6’ MEDIAN PLANTER BLOCKOUT PER DETAIL J ON LUMINAIRE PER DETAIL N ON DWG. NO. C17, C18, E1 & E2. REPLACE STREET LIGHT POLE WITH SINGLE MAST ARM LED RAMP #10 RAMP #13 RAMP #14 RAMP #12 TO STA 20+30.00FR STA 20+10.00TO STA 20+62.00FR STA 20+50.0022 L=25’TO STA 21+55FR STA 21+3021 22 20 TO STA 23+24.89FR STA 22+67.54L=57.35’ 20 TO STA 27+00.00FR STA 23+42.89L=357.11’ RAMP #11 C CPAVERS PAVERS OVER PETROMAT FABRIC EXIST FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 REMOVE 2" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH BEACH) OVER 3" OF B2-PG-64-10 (CITY OF HERMOSA EXIST FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH 2B OVER 3" OF B2-PG-64-10 EXIST FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH MATCH ADJACENT PAVEMENT DEPTH. CONSTRUCT BETWEEN 1"-4" C2-PG-64-10 AC. DEPTH TO COLOR EASTERN TAN BY DAVIS. JOINTS SHALL BE PER SPPWC STD 112-2. CONSTRUCT 4" CONCRETE MEDIAN PAVING. EXPANSION 112-2. COLOR EASTERN TAN BY DAVIS. PAVING. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PER SPPWC STD CONSTRUCT 12" WIDE AND 4" THICK CONCRETE MEDIAN OVER 1.5" OF B2-PG-64-10 OVER PETROMAT FABRIC SURFACE AND REPLACE WITH 1.5" OF C2-PG-64-10 REMOVE PAVEMENT TO 3" BELOW PROPOSED FINISHED OVER PETROMAT FABRIC C2-PG-64-10 OVER 1.5" OF B2-PG-64-10 SURFACE AND REPLACE WITH 1.5" OF COLORED REMOVE PAVEMENT TO 3" BELOW PROPOSED FINISHED POLEFPFPFPFP30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 SCALE: HORIZ. 1"=40’ VERT. 1"=4’ DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH S38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATE 06/26/2014 AT CENTERLINE EXISTING FINISHED SURFACE RIGHT CURB EXISTING 6" RIGHT CURB EXISTING 6" RIGHT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN RIGHT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN RIGHT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN RIGHT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB EXISTING 6" LEFT CURB EXISTING 6"31+00.00(13.19) TC32+00.00(13.65) TC33+00.00(13.93) TC34+00.00(14.54) TC35+00.00(14.92) TC38+00.00(16.33) TC39+00.00(16.51) TC31+00.00(13.03) TC32+00.00(13.49) TC33+00.00(14.03) TC34+00.00(14.66) TC35+00.00(15.02) TC37+00.00(15.82) TC38+00.00(16.30) TC39+00.00(16.77) TC31+11.10 EC13.61 TC31+65.50 BC13.80 TC33+24.15 EC14.63 TC33+72.55 BC14.89 TC35+83.97 PRC15.91 TC36+86.09 BC16.21 TC31+13.69 PCC13.93 TC31+64.50 EC14.10 TC33+26.74 PCC14.77 TC33+71.55 EC14.85 TC35+84.01 EC15.89 TC36+86.98 EC16.56 TC34+62.23 EC15.35 TC13.98 TC14.50 TC15.03 TC15.52 TC16.26 TC16.67 TC17.07 TC37+79.99 EC16.86 TC37+66.51 BC16.83 TC37+28.46 EC16.86 TC37+14.99 BC16.84 TC34+62.23 BC15.37 TC34+09.55 EC14.99 TC34+01.55 PCC15.14 TC33+90.22 BC15.15 TC33+10.55 BC14.85 TC33+06.50 EC14.82 TC32+98.50 PCC14.69 TC32+90.50 BC14.47 TC32+02.50 EC14.16 TC31+94.50 PCC14.28 TC31+83.17 BC14.31 TC30+97.50 BC14.03 TC30+87.97 EC13.98 TC30+79.97 PCC13.84 TC30+71.97 BC13.58 TC30+27.97 EC13.37 TC30+19.97 PCC13.57 TC30+08.64 BC13.62 TC0.47% 0.35% 0.72%0.42% -0.58% 0.99%-0.07% 0.19%15.53 FS16.94 TC17.37 TC35+86.07 BCR15.49 TC36+81.25 ECR15.76 TC35+58.72 ECR15.23 TC37+02.77 BCR16.24 TC0.46% 0.52% 0.52% 0.46% 0.43% 0.41%17.80 TC40+00.0039+00.0038+00.0037+00.0035+00.0034+00.0032+00.0033+00.0035+00.0038+00.0039+00.0031+00.0032+00.0033+00.0034+00.0035+00.0036+00.0037+00.0038+00.0039+00.0040+00.0017.48 TC40+00.0040+00.00(17.17) TC(17.23) TC40+00.0030+00.00(12.63) TC(12.73) TC30+00.0030+00.00(13.14) FS(17.43) FS(17.09) FS(16.37) FS(16.21) FS(15.56) FS(15.30) FS(14.74) FS(14.31) FS(13.88) FS(13.58) FS(SEE SHEET C6)MATCHLINE - STA. 40+0030+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 (SEE SHEET C6)MATCHLINE - STA. 40+001 inch = 40 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 20 40 80 16040 GRAPHIC SCALEMATCHLINE - STA. 30+00(SEE SHEET C4)MATCHLINE - STA. 30+00(SEE SHEET C4)CURVE DATA 12 10 13 NORTH HARBOR DRIVE 72.57’ RTSTA 30+08.64 BC6.00’ RTSTA 30+19.97 PCC10.00’ RTSTA 30+27.97 EC10.00’ RTSTA 30+71.97 BC6.00’ RTSTA 30+79.97 PCC2.00’ RTSTA 30+87.97 EC2.00’ RTSTA 30+97.50 BC7.95’ RTSTA 31+13.69 PCC15.00’ RTSTA 31+11.10 EC15.00’ RTSTA 31+65.50 BC9.17’ RTSTA 31+64.50 EC2.57’ RTSTA 31+83.17 BC6.00’ RTSTA 31+94.50 PCC10.00’ RTSTA 32+02.50 EC10.00’ RTSTA 32+90.50 BC6.00’ RTSTA 32+98.50 PCC2.00’ RTSTA 22+06.50 EC2.00’ RTSTA 33+10.55 BC7.95’ RTSTA 33+26.74 PCC15.00’ RTSTA 33+24.15 EC15.00’ RTSTA 33+72.55 BC9.17’ RTSTA 33+71.55 EC2.57’ RTSTA 33+90.22 BC6.00’ RTSTA 34+01.55 PCC10.00’ RTSTA 341+09.55 EC10.00’ RTSTA 34+62.23 BC15.00’ RTSTA 34+62.23 BC10.00’ RTSTA 35+84.01 EC15.00’STA 35+83.97 BC15.00’ RTSTA 36+86.09 BC3.00’ RTSTA 37+14.99 BC3.91’ RTSTA 37+28.46 EC9.09’ RTSTA 37+66.51 BC10.00’ RTSTA 37+79.99 ECSTA 36+31.88 EC10.00’12.67’7.35’ 10.00’9.27’5.00’ 25.00’17.61’9.19’ 4.00’9.75’10.88’ 3.00’8.41’17.49’ 60.56’ 2.50’7.82’ 2834.68’169.64’84.85’ 2824.68’121.35’60.68’ 2819.68’121.10’ 361.49’ 1.00’1.48’0.91’ 100.00’13.52’6.77’ 100.00’13.52’6.77’BERYL STREETPORTIFINO WAYNO.R L T 2 9 4 3 5 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 1 2 7 12 1 2 2 2 10 11 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 30 20 20 10 30 DISPOSITION NOTES PROTECT IN PLACE ADJUST TO GRADE A B C REMOVE 15 15 15 15 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 2 2A 6 11 11 6 11 112A 6 2 C 6 2 C 6 C C5 2A 2A 2 STA CL PORTIFINO WAY STA CL BERYL ST STA 36+35.11 NORTH HARBOR DR CL INT 0 12 12 12 12 STA 30+00.00 TO STA 40+00.00 N. HARBOR DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENT 6 10 11 12 15 14 16 17 6 PAVEMENT AC/AB PAVEMENT AC/AB 10 10 10 10 18 18 14 14 14 14 14 16 1616 161616 1616161616 6 PVMT AC/AB CL STA 38+97CL STA 37+65CL STA 37+79.94CL STA 38+23.94CL STA 38+67.94CL STA 39+11.94CL STA 39+55.94CL STA 39+99.94CL STA 37+64.08CL STA 38+32.35CL STA 35+41.60CL STA 34+97.58CL STA 34+53.55CL STA 34+39CL STA 35+11CL STA 35+26CL STA 32+57CL STA 30+77CL STA 31+66CL STA 32+83CL STA 32+25CL STA 32+6913.91’ RTSTA 36+85.09 EC3.00’ RTSTA 36+86.98 ECFP3.91’ RTSTA 36+85.98 BC17 17 18 B B B STD NO 120-2, W=18" CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC NO 120-2 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB ONLY TYPE A1-6 PER SPPWC STD DWG. NO. C17 4’ X 6’ MEDIAN PLANTER BLOCKOUT PER DETAIL J ON 8454’16" 14A 14A 14A14A 14A 14A 14A 17A 17A 17A 17A 17A 18 SEE DETAIL SHEET 17A17A NEEDED. SEE IRRIGATION PLANS FOR SIZE AND NUMBER. CONSTRUCT IRRIGATION SLEEVES. REPAIR TRENCH AS 21 L=30’ 21 PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. WITH CITY ENGINEER AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND LENGTH STD NO 120-2. LIMITS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. REPLACE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC 21 L=20’ 21 L=20’ 151-2 CONSTRUCT PARKWAY DRAIN, S=2’ PER SPPWC STD NO 1"=40’ LUMINAIRE PER DETAIL N ON DWG. NO. C17, C18, E1 & E2 REPLACE STREET LIGHT POLE WITH SINGLE MAST ARM LED DETAIL N ON DWG. NO. C17, C18, E1 & E2 DOUBLE MAST ARM STREET LIGHT LED LUMINAIRE PER REMOVE EXIST STREET LIGHT AND IN MEDIAN INSTALL PER PLAN) AND PER DETAILS DRAWING No. C9 AND C10 CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER SPPWC STD NO 111-5 (TYPE RAMP #15 RAMP #16 RAMP #17 C PAVERS CPAVERS C PAVERS C PAVERSTO STA 32+25.00FR STA 31+95.00TO STA 32+55.00FR STA 32+35.00 TO STA 38+70.00FR STA 38+50.00 RAMP #18 RAMP #19TO STA 37+01.24FR STA 36+86.9721TO STA 36+68.47FR STA 36+53.9621 L=14.27’ L=14.51’ 21 L=27.75’ 1248.6’74.3’NORTH HARBOR DRTO 48.60’ RT OF CLFR 74.35’ RT OF CLOVER PETROMAT FABRIC EXIST FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 REMOVE 2" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH MATCH ADJACENT PAVEMENT DEPTH. CONSTRUCT BETWEEN 1"-4" C2-PG-64-10 AC. DEPTH TO 112-2. COLOR EASTERN TAN BY DAVIS. PAVING. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PER SPPWC STD CONSTRUCT 12" WIDE AND 4" THICK CONCRETE MEDIAN COLOR EASTERN TAN BY DAVIS. JOINTS SHALL BE PER SPPWC STD 112-2. CONSTRUCT 4" CONCRETE MEDIAN PAVING. EXPANSION OVER PETROMAT FABRIC C2-PG-64-10 OVER 1.5" OF B2-PG-64-10 SURFACE AND REPLACE WITH 1.5" OF COLORED REMOVE PAVEMENT TO 3" BELOW PROPOSED FINISHED 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00SCALE: HORIZ. 1"=40’ VERT. 1"=4’ DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH S38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATE 06/26/2014 AT CENTERLINE EXISTING FINISHED SURFACE RIGHT CURB EXISTING 6"RIGHT CURB EXISTING 6" RIGHT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB PROP 6" MEDIAN LEFT CURB EXISTING 6"41+00.00(17.49) TC42+00.00(17.98) TC43+00.00(18.39) TC44+00.00(18.80) TC45+00.00(19.07) TC46+00.00(19.90) TC47+00.00(20.96) TC41+00.00(17.57) TC42+00.00(17.89) TC43+00.00(18.35) TC44+00.00(18.54) TC46+00.00(19.25) TC47+00.00(20.41) TC44+14.16 EC19.07 TC44+14.16 BC19.30 TC42+98.15ANGLE POIINT18.77 TC42+68.38ANGLE POIINT18.57 TC17.89 TC18.29 TC19.04 TC42+94.80ANGLE POINT18.77 TC0.43% 0.44%18.23 TC18.56 TC18.80 TC19.24 TC44+07.85 BCR18.58 TC45+29.90 ECR19.18 TC0.41% 0.26%0.68%17.80 TC40+00.0041+00.0044+00.0042+00.0041+00.0044+00.0043+00.0042+00.0040+00.0041+00.0042+00.0044+00.0045+00.0017.48 TC40+00.0040+00.00(17.17) TC40+00.00(17.23) TC37+79.99 EC16.86 TC0.22%43+00.0046+00.0047+00.00(20.57) FS(19.66 FS)(19.46) FS(19.03) FS(18.37) FS(18.07) FS(17.66) FS(17.43) FS40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 40+00 1 inch = 40 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 20 40 80 16040 GRAPHIC SCALEMATCHLINE - STA. 40+00(SEE SHEET C5)MATCHLINE - STA. 40+00(SEE SHEET C5)NO.R L T CURVE DATA - NORTH HARBOR DRIVE 815.01’ RTSTA 42+68.38 PT10.00’ RTSTA 44+14.16 EC14.00’ RTSTA 44+14.16 EC14.00’ RTSTA 42+98.15 PT2.00’6.28’ENTRANCEMARINAREDONDO BEACH N PACI FI C AVE1 1 10 20 30 0 10 20 30 0 DISPOSITION NOTES A B C PROTECT IN PLACE ADJUST TO GRADE REMOVE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 6 3A 11 2 10 6 2B C6STA 42+94.80 PT12 12 8 8 12 7 7 11 6 2 10 C 6 2 13 W=22’STA 46+28.95C/L DWYEND PROJ ECTSTA 47+39.947 STA 40+00.00 TO STA 47+39.94 N. HARBOR DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENT 8 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 8 6 6 16 16 16 16 16 16 14 1414 14 1414 14 PAVEMENT AC/AB C PAVEMENT AC/AB 18 18 CL STA 47+01CL STA 45+90CL STA 44+46CL STA 42+83CL STA 41+26CL STA 40+05CL STA 42+06CL STA 43+66CL STA 45+35CL STA 40+57CL STA 40+43.94CL STA 40+87.94CL STA 41+31.94CL STA 41+75.94CL STA 42+16.94CL STA 42+63.94ANGLE POINTSTA 46+02.62, 28.08’ RTBEGIN CURB, SIDEWALKSTA 45+93.01, 28.00’ RTJOIN CURB STA 46+71.97, 25.81’ RT 17 B CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY APPROACH TYPE PER SPPWC STD 110-2 CONSTRUCT 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER SPPWC STD NO 112-2 DWG. NO. C17 4’ X 6’ MEDIAN PLANTER BLOCKOUT PER DETAIL J ON 120-2, W=18" CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC STD NO APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER CONSTRUCT 3" COLORED AC OVER 3" AB PAVEMENT AND AS NO 120-2 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB ONLY TYPE A1-6 PER SPPWC STD 14A 14A 14A 14A SEE IRRIGATION PLANS FOR SIZE AND NUMBER. CONSTRUCT IRRIGATION SLEEVES. REPAIR TRENCH AS NEEDED. DRAWING NO. C12 SEE DETAIL SHEET L=35’ 21 PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. WITH CITY ENGINEER AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND LENGTH STD NO 120-2. LIMITS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. REPLACE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC PLAN) AND PER DETAILS DRAWING No. C9 AND C10 CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER SPPWC STD NO 111-5 (TYPE PER 1"=40’ LUMINAIRE PER DETAIL N ON DWG. NO. C17, C18, E1 & E2 REPLACE STREET LIGHT POLE WITH SINGLE MAST ARM LED DWG. NO. C17, C18, E1 & E2 MAST ARM STREET LIGHT LED LUMINAIRE PER DETAIL N ON REMOVE EXIST STREET LIGHT AND IN MEDIAN INSTALL DOUBLE RAMP #20 RAMP #21 21TO STA 41+75.00FR STA 41+40.00L=50’ 21TO STA 43+70.00FR STA 43+20.00L=10’ 21TO STA 45+50.00FR STA 45+40.002 2A 2A2A 2B CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONT’D OVER PETROMAT FABRIC EXIST FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 REMOVE 2" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH MATCH ADJACENT PAVEMENT DEPTH. CONSTRUCT BETWEEN 1"-4" C2-PG-64-10 AC. DEPTH TO DAVIS. SHALL BE PER SPPWC STD 112-2. COLOR EASTERN TAN BY CONSTRUCT 4" CONCRETE MEDIAN PAVING. EXPANSION JOINTS OVER PETROMAT FABRIC C2-PG-64-10 OVER 1.5" OF B2-PG-64-10 SURFACE AND REPLACE WITH 3" OF REMOVE PAVEMENT TO 3" BELOW PROPOSED FINISHED OVER PETROMAT FABRIC C2-PG-64-10 OVER 1.5" OF B2-PG-64-10 AND REPLACE WITH 1.5" OF COLORED REMOVE PAVEMENT TO 3" BELOW PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACE TREES TREES TREES TREES 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 14" G A S14"GAS14"GAS14"GAS14"GAS31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+009+0011+0012+0031+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+009+0011+0012+0014"GAS14"GAS14"GAS10"FM10"FM10"FM10"FM10"FM10"FM10"FM10"FM(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)ECECECECECECECECGAS2"GAS2"GAS2"GAS2"GAS2"GAS2"GASSDSDSDSDWEC10"FM2"ACWTR10"FM10"FM10"FM(SEE SHEET BELOW LEFT)MATCHLINE - STA. 40+00MATCHLINE - STA. 40+00(SEE SHEET ABOVE RIGHT)HERONDO STREET (28.89 FL)(28.15 FL)3 (28.47 FL)A (SEE SHEET C8)MATCHLINE - STA. 50+00ARDMORE AVENUEVALLEY DRI VEN FRANCISCA AVETO STA 43+15.00FR STA 42+85.00 DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH SAPPROVED BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: DATE 38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATEDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FRANK SENTENO, 06/26/2014 1 inch = 40 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 20 40 80 16040 GRAPHIC SCALE 9 CITY BOUNDARY HERONDO STREETMONTEREY BLVDCITY BOUNDARY DISPOSITION NOTES PROTECT IN PLACE ADJUST TO GRADE 4 A B 4 C REMOVE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 4 12 6A 5 5 5 5 SEE DETAIL SHEET 4 C7 12 11 12 11 STREET IMPROVEMENT STA 30+00.00 TO STA 50+00.00 HERONDO STREET 9 11 9 17 STA. 30+51.66 BCMATCHLINE - 17 19 B B 14 SPPWC STD NO 120-2, W=12" CONSTRUCT 6" CURB WITH SHED GUTTER TYPE A3-6 PER STD NO 120-2 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB ONLY TYPE A1-6 PER SPPWC SIZE AND NUMBER. TRENCH AS NEEDED. SEE IRRIGATION PLANS FOR CONSTRUCT IRRIGATION SLEEVES. REPAIR 18 18 18 A A A B A A 21 L=40’ 23 AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND LENGTH WITH CITY ENGINEER STD NO 112-2. LIMITS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR NO 120-2. CONSTRUCT 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER SPPWC CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC STD REMOVE EXISTING AC PATCH OVER FORMER RAILWAY. CONCRETE. SEE DETAIL ON DWG. NO. C16 FOR DETAILS. GREY CHARCOAL COLORED PAVERS AND EASTERN TAN COLORED CONSTRUCT RANDOM PATTERN ISRAEL PEWTER AMBER LIGHT PLAN) AND PER DETAILS DRAWING No. C9 AND C10 CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER SPPWC STD NO 111-5 (TYPE PER 1"=40’ GRIND AND OVERLAY AT JOIN PER DETAIL ON SHEET C12 LUMINAIRE PER DETAIL N ON DWG. NO. C17, C18, E1 & E2 REPLACE STREET LIGHT POLE WITH SINGLE MAST ARM LED RAMP #22 RAMP #23 3 3 TO STA 39+79.35FRO STA 39+39.35 PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. WITH CITY ENGINEER AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND LENGTH STD NO 120-2. LIMITS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. REPLACE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC 21 B2-PG-64-10 (CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH) FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 OVER 3" OF REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH EXIST B2-PG-64-10 FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 OVER 3" OF REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH EXIST 6 6 6 BE PER SPPWC STD 112-2. COLOR EASTERN TAN BY DAVIS. CONSTRUCT 4" CONCRETE MEDIAN PAVING. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL ADJACENT PAVEMENT DEPTH. CONSTRUCT BETWEEN 1"-4" C2-PG-64-10 AC. DEPTH TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVEMENT DEPTH (CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH) CONSTRUCT BETWEEN 1"-4" C2-PG-64-10 AC. DEPTH TO MATCH CCURBC PAVEMENT 5"AC/5"AB C GUTTER CURB & C PAVEMENT 5"AC/5"AB UNITS1, LINE PROJECT NO. 1105, EXISTING LACFCD UNITS1, LINE PROJECT NO. 1105, EXISTING LACFCD (27.46 FL)(42.25 FL)(54.33 FL)(27.91 FL)(30.25 FL)(27.00 FL)(26.46 FL)417(27.71 FL)STA 10+20.03 NORTH HARBOR DR STA 30+00.00 HERONDO ST CL INT =C/L VALLEY DRIVE STA 42+39.64 HERONDO ST CL INT =C/L VALLEY DRIVE STA 42+99.59 HERONDO ST CL INT =C/L ARDMORE AVENUE STA 43+66.35 HERONDO ST CL INT =C/L MONTEREY BLVD STA 35+68.44 HERONDO ST CL INT(13.01 FL)(13.60FL)EXIST JS NO.1 STA 6+87.00 HERMOSA AVENUENORTH HARBOR DRIVEMATCHLINE - STA. 30+57.90 EC(SEE SHEET C3)6A 14 14CL STA 30+59CL STA 31+56(23.62 FL)14CL STA 32+50(12.83 FL)14CL STA 33+41CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY OF REDONDO BEACH 14CL STA 34+3214CL STA 40+7314CL STA 35+3314CL STA 36+25A 14CL STA 37+1214CL STA 38+0314CL STA 38+9514CL STA 41+7214CL STA 39+8414CL STA 42+8123 14CL STA 43+29(1 5.0 5 FL)(26.54 FL)(28.28 FL)14CL STA 44+13AB(32.90 FL)14CL STA 45+11(42.79 FL)(54.91 FL)(27.43 FL)(24.32 FL)(1 5.6 7 FL) 14CL STA 46+37TO STA 46+50.00FR STA 46+00.04(28.57 F L)(42.04 FL)(54.12FL)(27.02 FL)(23.48 FL)(14.62 FL)(26.03 FL)14CL STA 47+64(43.04 FL)(54.97 FL)(27.45 FL)(23.99 FL)(15.24 FL)21 L=50’ 14CL STA 48+924 4 4 4 19 19 19 19 3 21 (27.80 F L) (28.96 F L) L=30’TO STA 45+38.00FR STA 45+00.0021 L=30’ L=49.96’ L=38’ 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 14"GAS14"GAS14"GAS14"GAS8"OIL8"OIL8"OIL8"OIL4"OIL4"OIL4"OIL4"OILN. CATALINA AVEHERONDO STREET PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY19 14 DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH SAPPROVED BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: DATE 38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATEDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FRANK SENTENO, 06/26/2014 1 inch = 40 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 20 40 80 16040 GRAPHIC SCALE 10 CITY BOUNDARY 5 MATCHLINE - STA. 50+00(SEE SHEET C7)CONSTRUCTION NOTES 4 5 C8 5 CONCRETE. SEE DETAIL ON DWG. NO. C16 FOR DETAILS. GREY CHARCOAL COLORED PAVERS AND EASTERN TAN COLORED CONSTRUCT RANDOM PATTERN ISRAEL PEWTER AMBER LIGHT 1"=40’ GRIND AND OVERLAY AT JOIN PER DETAIL ON SHEET C12 NOTE: (SEE NOTE *) BOUNDARY CALTRANS * RIGHT-OF-WAY. CALTRANS FOR WORK PERFORMED WITHIN STATE OF CALIFORNIA PERMIT AND PROVIDE APPLICABLE INSURANCE AS REQUIRED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR CALTRANS ENCROACHMENT LUMINAIRE PER DETAIL N ON DWG. NO. C17, C18, E1 & E2 REPLACE STREET LIGHT POLE WITH SINGLE MAST ARM LED B2-PG-64-10 FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 OVER 3" OF REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH EXIST (66.94 FL)STREET IMPROVEMENT STA 50+00.00 TO STA 52+71.91 HERONDO STREETEND PROJECTSTA 52+71.91(76.35 FL)(71.57 FL)CL PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY STA 53+06.88 HERONDO ST CL INT EXIST COLD JOINT LINE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY OF REDONDO BEACH 19 14CL STA 50+18(66.65 FL)(67.03 FL)19(66.95 FL)14CL STA 51+424 4 ( 7 1. 4 5 F L)(72.12 FL)(72.19 FL)(75.12 FL)(76.09 FL)(76.06 FL) 2 2 + 0 0 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW 10/2013 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH SAPPROVED BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: DATE 38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATEDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FRANK SENTENO, 06/26/2014 15 1 inch = 10 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 5 10 2010 GRAPHIC SCALE 11 C9 MAX 8.33 % MAX 8.33 % MAX2.0%8.33 % 8.33 % MAX2%MAX2% 10’ 8’ 5’ 6’ 6’ 10’ 6’ 10’ 7’ 8’5’R5’R 2 0’R5’R 6’ 5 ’ 6 ’ 4’ 7’ 7’ 7’ 8’6’ 6’ 6’ 5 ’ 6’MAX2.0% 6’7’4’M A X2.0% 8’ 8’ 4’ 6’ 11’ 8’5’R6’7’ 9’ 1 3’ CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ADA ACCESS RECONSTRUCTION 7. 0’ 8. 0’ 5.0’ 8.0’ MAX2% MAX2% 4’ 40 4’ 4’ 1"=10’7’7’7’7’ TYPE-1;CASE-A NORTHWEST CORNER OF HERONDO ST AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE TYPE-1;CASE-A SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HERONDO ST AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE TYPE-2;CASE-B SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERONDO ST AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE TYPE-1;CASE-B INTERSECTION ALONG HARBOR DRIVE SOUTHWEST OF YACHT CLUB WAY AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE TYPE-2;CASE-B AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARINA WAY TYPE-2;CASE-D AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MARINA WAY TYPE-2;CASE-D AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MARINA WAY RAMP #1 RAMP #2 RAMP #3 TYPE-1;CASE-B NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH HARBOR DRIVE AND YACHT CLUB WAY TYPE-1;CASE-B AND YACHT CLUB WAY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH HARBOR DRIVE RAMP #4 RAMP #9 RAMP #10 RAMP #11 RAMP #12 12.84 FL 13.34 TC 0" CF12.91 FL 12.91 TC 0" CF12.89 FL 12.89 TC 12.89 FL 13.39 TC 8.3% 8.3%FS13.57 FS13.57 0" CF12.82 FL 12.82 TC12.83 FL 13.33 TC FS13.48 FS13.47 0" CF12.81 FL 12.81 TC 12.81 FL 13.31 TC 6.6% 6.6% 12.68 FL 13.18 TC 0" CF 12.60 FL 12.60 TC 0" CF 12.63 FL 12.63 TC 6.6%5.8%13.18 FS 12.74 FS 12.77 FS 13.35 FS 8.3%0.9%25’R 6.3%0" CF 12.03 FL 12.03 TC 0" CF 12.08 FL 12.08 TC 12.20 FS 12.70 TC 12.51 FS 12.20 FS 12.17 FS 5.8’ 4. 7’4’ 12.53 FS 7. 7 %6. 9 %5.3% 7.8% 12.08 FS 12.58 TC 2%0" CF 11.87 FS 11.87 TC 12.23 FS 12.25 FS2%4’11.84 FS 12.34 TC 5. 9 %12.30 FS 12.80 TC 6.4% 12.82 FS 0" CF 12.10 FS 12.10 TC 7.4% 7.96’ 12.60 FS 4. 9’ 7. 1 %3. 2’ 4. 0’ 0" CF 11.65 FL 11.65 TC 0" CF 11.60 FL 11.60 TC 11.73 FS 12.58 FS 7.7% 11.97 FL 12.47 TC 0" CF 11.56 FL 11.56 TC 0" CF 11.58 FL 11.58 TC7.5% 11.0’ 11.89 FS MAX2%MAX2 %11.69 FS 11.71 FS 11.86 FS 5 %3. 0’5 %11.23 FL 11.76 TC 11.24 FL 11.74 TC 11.41 FL 11.91 TC 12.20 FS 5 %7. 3 %6" CF 11.85 FS 12.35 TC 0" CF 11.86 FS 11.86 TC 6" CF 11.87 FS 12.37 TC 7. 3 %6" CF 12.10 FS 12.60 TC 0" CF 12.12 FS 12.12 TC 6" CF 12.13 FS 12.63 TC 7. 3 %0" CF 11.35 FL 11.35 TC 0" CF 11.34 FL 11.34 TC7. 3 %11.50 FS 11.51 FS 12.02 FS 7. 1 %12.01 FS 6" CF 9.64 FL 10.14 TC 0" CF 9.64 FL 9.64 TC 0" CF 9.67 FL 9.67 TC 6" CF 9.94 FL 10.44 TC 10.02 FS 10.00 FS 5%10’6’10’10.28 FS 7.7%10.56 FS 6" CF 10.32 FS 10.82 TC 10.90 FS 0" CF 10.45 FL 10.45 TC 10.72 FS 0" CF 10.72 FS 10.72 TC 0" CF 10.54 FS 10.54 TC 6" CF 10.25 FS 10.75 TC 0" CF 10.68 FS 10.68 TC 10.70 FS 4’10.87 FS 26.04’ RT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 10+29.33 RAMP CL SIGNAL POLE REMOVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE REMOVE TRAFFIC 13.52’ RT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 10+73.76 RAMP CL 36.93’ LT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 10+71.00 RAMP CL SIGNAL POLE REMOVE TRAFFIC 30.42’ LT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 12+13.54 RAMP CL 35.89’ RT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 22+49.81 RAMP CL SIGNAL POLE REMOVE TRAFFIC 34.51’ LT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 12+55.00 RAMP CL SIGNAL POLE REMOVE TRAFFIC 32.00’ LT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 22+53.95 RAMP CL 32.00’ LT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 22+22.12 RAMP CL TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE PROTECT IN PLACE (X.X FS) JOIN EXIST RAMP #5 AND RAMP #6 RAMP #6 TYPE-1;CASE-B RAMP #5 TYPE-1;CASE-D SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH HARBOR DRIVE AND YACHT CLUB WAY 29.38’ RT STA 12+43.07 NORTH HARBOR DR RAMP #5 CL 29.00’ RT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 12+58.28 RAMP #6 CL RAMP #7 AND RAMP #8 29.00’ RT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 13+33.80 RAMP #7 CL 15.00’ RT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 13+34.30 RAMP #8 CL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ELEVATION AND MAXIMUM SLOPES N O R T H H A R B O R D RI V E N O R T H H A R B O R D RI V E NORT H HARBOR DRI VENORT H HARBOR DRI VENORT H HARBOR DRI VE NORT H HARBOR DRI VE NORT H HARBOR DRI VE6" CF (10.32 FS) (10.82 TC) JOIN EXIST (10.91 FS) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (10.25 FS) (10.76 TC) JOIN EXIST (10.87 FS) JOIN EXIST (13.17 FS) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (12.68 FS) (13.18 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF 12.79 FL 13.29 TC 10’4’10’6" CF (12.80 FL) (13.30 TC) JOIN EXIST (12.53 FS) JOIN EXIST (12.52 FS) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (12.21 FS) (12.71 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (12.09 FS) (12.59 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF 11.97 FL) (12.47 TC) JOIN EXIST (12.58 FS) JOIN EXIST (12.20 FS) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (11.40 FL) (11.90 TC) JOIN EXIST 11.36 FL 11.86 TC6" CF (11.36 FL) (11.86 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (11.33 FL) (11.83 TC) JOIN EXIST 11.33 FL 11.83 TC (12.01 FS) JOIN EXIST FS) (12.02 JOIN EXIST 6" CF (12.31 FS) (12.81 TC) JOIN EXIST (12.82 FS) JOIN EXIST 0" CF (11.84 FS) (12.34 TC) JOIN EXIST (12.60 FS) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (9.60 FL) (10.10 TC) JOIN EXIST (10.31 FS) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (9.96 FL) (10.46 TC) JOIN EXIST (10.56 FS) JOIN EXIST 5’ 5’ 8’ 5. 1 %5. 3 % FP FP FP 36+00 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW 10/2013 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH SAPPROVED BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: DATE 38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATEDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FRANK SENTENO, 06/26/2014 REMOVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE PROTECT IN PLACE 42.00’ RT STA 36+16.63 HERONDO ST RAMP CL EXISTING SIGN PROTECT IN PLACE 12 TYPE-2;CASE-B NORTHWEST CORNER OF PORTOFINO WAY AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE TYPE-2;CASE-B NORTHEAST CORNER OF BERYL STREET AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE TYPE-2;CASE-B SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BERYL STREET AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE TYPE-2;CASE-B AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE NORTHWEST CORNER OF REDONDO BEACH MARINA ENTRANCE TYPE-2;CASE-B AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF REDONDO BEACH MARINA ENTRANCE TYPE-1;CASE-B SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MONTEREY BLVD AND HERONDO ST 6’6’7’7’20’R25’R72’R25 ’R 1 0 0 ’R35’R 35’R4’6’6’8’6’7’ 6’ 7’ 7’ 7’ 8.33% 8.3 3 %8 ’ 10’ 1 1’4’10’10’ 7 ’ 7 ’MAX2 %6 ’ 8’ 8 ’ TYPE-1;CASE-B SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH HARBOR DRIVE AND MARINA WAY 4’MAX2.0%MAX2.0%MAX 2 .0% M A X2.0% 8’ 6’ 4’MAX2.0%4 ’ 8’ 9 ’ ADA ACCESS RECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C10 4’ MAX2.0%MAX2. 0 %1 inch = 10 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 5 10 20 4010 GRAPHIC SCALE PER CALTRANS RSP A88B TYPE A PASSAGEWAY HERONDO ST MEDIAN AT HERONDO ST AND MONTEREY BLVD 7’ 4’ 7’7’7’7’7’4’7’ 4’ 7’7’7’ 7’ 4’ RAMP #13 RAMP #14 RAMP #15 RAMP #16 RAMP #17 RAMP #20 RAMP #21 RAMP #22 RAMP #23 RAMP #18 AND RAMP #19 10.84 FS 10.81 FS29.00’ LT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 23+33.89 RAMP CL 10.50 FS 10.37 FS 14.96 FL 15.46 TC 14.94 FL 15.44 TC 35.83’ RT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 36+03.52 RAMP CL 15.06 FL 15.72 TC 41.64’ LT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 35+98.47 RAMP CL 15.62 FS 15.59 FS 15.71 FS 15.13 FS 15.90 FS SIGNAL POLE REMOVE TRAFFIC 37.86’ LT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 36+83.68 RAMP CL SIGNAL POLE REMOVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE REMOVE TRAFFIC 16.27 FS 15.80 FS 15.78 FS 16.36 FS 15.63 FS 15.69 FS 16.08 FS 34.16’ RT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 44+27.67 RAMP CL 34.16’ RT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 45+10.07 RAMP CL 18.90 FS 18.57 FS 18.65 FS 19.12 FS 18.82 FL 19.32 TC 18.66 FL 19.16 TC 19.25 FS 18.90 FS 18.85 FS 19.37 FS 27.10 FS 26.71 FS 26.75 FS 27.19 FS LIGHT POLE RELOCATE ELECTRIC HERONDO ST STA 36+18.74 RAMP CL 33.90’ RT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 23+34.70 RAMP CL 9’SIGNAL POLE RELOCATE TRAFFIC TYPE-1;CASE-A SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MARINA WAY AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE 15.10 FL 15.60 TC 0" CF 15.20 FL 15.20 TC 0" CF 15.26 FL 15.26 TC 15.31 FL 15.81 TC 6.7%5. 4 %15.25 FL 15.75 TC 0" CF 15.26 FL 15.26 TC 0" CF 15.34 FL 15.34 TC RAMP #19 TYPE-1;CASE-A RAMP #18 TYPE-1;CASE-A SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PORTOFINO WAY AND NORTH HARBOR DRIVE HERONDO STREET HERONDO STREET NOR T H HARB OR DRI VE NOR T H HAR BOR DRI VENORTH HAR B OR DRI VE NORT H HAR BOR DRI VENOR T H HAR B OR DRI VE NOR T H HAR BOR DRI VE NOR T H HARBOR DRI VE NOR T H HARB OR DRI VE 5. 1 %39.52’ RT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 36+52.61 RAMP #18 CL 29.00’ RT NORTH HARBOR DR STA 36+77.72 RAMP #19 CL (16.06 FS) JOIN EXIST 15.93 FS 8.33% 15.26 FL 15.76 TC 6’ 6’ 4’ 15.71 FS CONTRACTOR SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ELEVATION AND MAXIMUM SLOPES (10.84 FS) JOIN EXIST 10.34 FL 10.84 TC 0" CF 10.34 FL 10.34 TC 0" CF 10.32 FL 10.32 TC 7. 1 %10.31 FL 10.81 TC (10.81 FS) JOIN EXIST 7. 0 %5. 7 %2.0%9.67 FL 10.17 TC 0" CF 9.62 FL 9.62 TC 0" CF 9.74 FL 9.74 TC 9.77 FL 10.27 TC 7 .6% 7.9 %7.6%8.3%10.42 FS 10.45 FS 2%(15.62 FS) JOIN EXIST 0" CF 14.93 FL 14.93 TC 0" CF 14.92 FL 14.92 TC9’4’9’(15.59 FS) JOIN EXIST 5.8%10.44 FS 10.44 FS 15.05 FS 15.04 FS 8.1%5.8%7.9%5. 3 %15.56 FL 16.23 TC 0" CF 15.66 FL 15.66 TC (16.37 FS) JOIN EXIST 0" CF 15.64 FL 15.64 TC (16.33 FS) JOIN EXIST 6 .7 %15.67 FL 16.34 TC 10’4’10’7.0%5 .7 %8.3%15.77 FS FS 16.00 16.01 FS (16.54 FS) JOIN EXIST 18.43 FL 18.43 TC 18.23 FL 18.73 TC 18.62 FL 19.12 TC6’4’10’(18.91 FS) JOIN EXIST 0" CF 18.35 FL 18.35 TC 6.9%(19.12 FS) JOIN EXIST 6.7%4’5.0%8.33%10’ 4’10’18.70 FL 18.70 TC 18.65 FL 18.65 TC 5.1 %6. 2% 7.4 % 5.0% (19.25 FS) JOIN EXIST (19.37 FS) JOIN EXIST 0" CF 26.61 FL 26.61 TC 0" CF 26.57 FL 26.57 TC 26.50 FL 27.00 TC 5.6% 6.3% (27.19 FS) JOIN EXIST (27.10 FS) JOIN EXIST 26.67 FL 27.17 TC 8.0% 5.6% 1. 5 %1. 8 %0" CF 14.97 FL 14.97 TC 0" CF 15.09 FL 15.09 TC (15.91 FS) JOIN EXIST (15.72 FS) JOIN EXIST 7.4 %7.9% 15.37 FS 14.88 FL 15.55 TC 8.33 %8’6’ 8’ 8" CF (14.88 FL) (15.55 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (14.96 FS) (15.46 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (14.95 FL) (15.45 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (9.69 FL) (10.19 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (9.88 FS) (10.38 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (10.31 FL) (10.81 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (10.34 FS) (10.84 TC) JOIN EXIST 8" CF (15.68 FL) (16.35 TC) JOIN EXIST 8" CF (15.56 FS) (16.23 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (15.32 FL) (15.82 TC) JOIN EXIST6" CF (15.04 FL) (15.54 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (18.62 FS) (19.12 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (18.17 FS) (18.67 TC) JOIN EXIST 8" CF (15.07 FL) (15.73 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (18.81 FS) (19.31 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (18.68 FS) (19.18 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (26.50 FL) (27.00 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (27.11 FL) (27.61 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (27.10 FL) (27.60 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (26.99 FL) (27.49 TC) JOIN EXIST 6" CF (26.99 FL) (27.49 TC) JOIN EXIST 7. 6 % TREES13.213.514.51515 PM 2 0 2031+00 32+00 33+00 DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH SAPPROVED BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: DATE 38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATEDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FRANK SENTENO, 01/16/2013 NO.R L T 1 10 14 6 8 12 15 15 20 9428’48" 10645’57" 0510’27" 7620’12" 0542’38" 2.00’3.30’2.16’ 2.00’3.73’2.69’ 50.00’4.52’2.26’ 2.00’2.66’1.57’ 29.90’14.96’300.00’ 1 inch = 10 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 13 C11 STA 10+20.03 NORTH HARBOR DR STA 30+00.00 HERONDO ST CL INTHERMOSA AVENUENORTH HARBOR DRIVECITY OF REDONDO BEACH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY BOUNDARY13.20’ FS13.70’ TC35.14’ LTSTA 30+27.02 BC13.15’ FS13.65’ TC36.70’ LTSTA 30+30.39 PCC13.20’ FS13.70’ TC32.33’ LTSTA 30+35.70 PCC13.22’ FS13.72’ TC30.75’ LTSTA 30+36.53 BC2 3 4 5 BEARING/DELTA 9 11 12 16 17 18 19 14 13 19 S2223’5"E 3.83’ 8.65’ 50.00’4.52’2.26’ 16 18 17 S2427’23"W -- S6532’36"W -- 2021 22 21 85.54’ S6850’44"W -102.32’- S6308’06"W -- 13 22 -10.88’-S2223’5"E CURVE/LINE DATA NO.R L T 1 2 3 7 8 11 13645’19"2.00’4.77’5.05’ 11136’26" 11435’30" 13.36’ 8.94’ 2.00’2.94’ 50.00’17.78’8.99’ 76.62’ 3.9’ 4 6 5 8.43’ 11435’30" 5312’03" 50.00’6.88’3.45’ 2.00’1.86’1.00’ BEARING/DELTA N2427’23W -- S6532’36"W -- S2223’05"E -- 9 58.37’ 10 17417’22"2.00’6.08’40.10’ N6850’44"E -- S6308’06"W -- CURVE/LINE DATA13.37’ FS13.87’ TC21.80’ LTSTA 30+27.28 < PT7 13.31’ FS13.81’ TC22.31’ LTSTA 30+36.71 < PT13.39’ FS13.89’ TC13.81’ LTSTA 30+28.25 < PT13.36’ FS13.86’ TC14.31’ LTSTA 30+36.89 < PT13.38’ FS13.88’ TC11.55’ LTSTA 30+36.95 EC13.40’ FS13.90’’ TC9.58’ LTSTA 30+35.46 PCC13.41’ FS13.91’ TC8.22’ LTSTA 30+31.16 PCC13.41’ FS13.91’ TC9.98’ LTSTA 30+28.47 BC13.33’ FS13.83’ TC24.21’ LTSTA 30+44.68 BC13.45’ FS13.95’ TC13.33’ LTSTA 30+44.91 BC13.50’ FS14.00’ TC11.39’ LTSTA 30+47.11 EC13.97’ FS14.47’ TC19.01’ LTSTA 31+23.35 BC13.90’ FS14.40’ TC23.00’ LTSTA 31+23.15 EC13.46’ FS13.96’ TC21.65’ LTSTA 30+78.07 BCC13.33’ FS13.83’ TC26.13’ LTSTA 30+47.37 BCC13.67’ FS14.17’ TC’ 2.00’ RTSTA 30+53.95 EC14.41’ FS14.91’ TC6.51’ LTSTA 31+39.06 BC14.66’ FS15.16’ TC8.00’ LTSTA 31+68.91 EC17.72’ FS18.22’ TC8.00’ LTSTA 32+71.23 PTJOIN EXISTCONSTRUCTION DETAILS SPLINTER ISLAND HERONDO MEDIAN AND 10 5 10 20 40 1"=10’ 15.515.615.916.437+00 DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH SAPPROVED BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: DATE 38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATEDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FRANK SENTENO, 01/16/201319.519.720 2020.3GNVTREESDENSE46+00 NO.R L T 15 6220’30" 1820’46" 2347’57" 10.72’ 5.00’5.44’3.02’ 25.00’8.01’4.04’ 93.00’38.63’19.60’ 1 inch = 10 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 14 C12 BEARING/DELTA 12 14 13 7.77’ 28.95’ 16 18 17 -12.27’- CURVE/LINE DATA NO.R L T 1 2 3 7 8 11 12541’07"1.00’2.19’1.95’ 2055’47" 2249’39" 11.05’ 2.17’ 35.00’6.46’ 25.00’9.96’5.05’ 45.35’ 4 6 5 7.02’ 8454’16" 7.24’ 1.00’1.48’0.91’ BEARING/DELTA 2519’01" -- 9 22.00’ 10 7905’03"2.00’2.76’1.65’ S2601’06"E -- CURVE/LINE DATA CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 25.00’5.61’ 12405’35"1.00’1.88’ S6904’38"W N2601’06"W -- 12.79’ 1236’18"100.00’11.04’ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 S2732’39"E -- N6227’21"E 4431’56"10.00’4.09’ 6621’01"25.00’16.34’ 4 3 1 5 NORTH HARBOR DRIVE BERYL STREETPORTOFINO WAY15.04’ FL15.54’ TC74.48’ RTSTA 36+57.48 BC14.97 FS15.47’ TC62.14’ RTSTA 36+54.40 PRC15.07’ FS15.57’ TC52.51’ RTSTA 36+52.15 PCC15.32’ FS15.82’ TC30.62’ RTSTA 36+53.92 PCC15.43’ FS15.93’ TC29.00’ RTSTA 36+55.88 EC14.88’ FS15.38’ TC29.00’ RTSTA 37+01.24 PT15.72’ FS16.22’ TC15.00’ RTSTA 36+60.78 BC15.76’ FS16.26’ TC13.42’ RTSTA 36+59.97 PCC15.96’ FS16.46’ TC6.13’ RTSTA 36+68.15 PCC15.94’ FS16.44’ TC7.10’ RTSTA 36+69.64 EC15.72’ FS16.22’ TC14.09’ RTSTA 36+69.01 BC15.70’ FS16.20’ TC15.00’ RTSTA 36+68.02 EC18.77’ FS19.27’ TC28.00’ RTSTA 45+93.01 POB18.70’ FS19.20’ TC28.08’ RTSTA 46+02.62 > PI19.09’ FS19.59’ TC15.82’ RTSTA 46+03.02 BC19.27’ FS19.77’ TC11.57’ RTSTA 46+05.52 PCC19.35’ FS19.85’ TC9.98’ RTSTA 46+12.37 PRC19.62’ FS20.12’ TC10.74’ RTSTA 46+46.42 PRC19.63’ FS20.13’ TC14.11’ RTSTA 46+52.26 PRC19.79’ FS20.29’ TC25.81’ RTSTA 46+71.97 ECNORTH HARBOR DRIVE 10 5 10 20 40 1"=10’LIMIT OF GRINDAND OVERLAYFS EXISTING AC PAVEMENT 5’ GRIND AND OVERLAY N.T.S.LIMIT OF FULL DEPTHGRIND AND REPLACEAC PAVEMENT 2" OF C2-PG-64-10 GRIND 2" AND CONSTRUCT GRIND AND REPLACE PER PLAN MEDIAN AND CURB NORTH HARBOR DRIVE HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALE DEMOLITION / REMOVAL NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES LEGEND DEMOLITION PLAN LOT 13 WELCOME PLAZA C13 15 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALE LEGEND GRADING AND PAVING CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES SECTION A-A SECTION B-B SECTION C-C SECTION D-D SECTION E-E SECTION F-F HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALE UTILITY AND LIGHTING NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CURB RAMPS A - D - PAVEMENT GRIND AND A.C. OVERLAY TYPICAL SECTION A-A DOME SPACING C - PAVER PATTERN E - VALLEY GUTTER B - CONCRETE HEADER 800-258-2353 www.ackerstone.com Rev: 1/13 Antique Kobble (Rec. & Sq.) Random (67% Rectangles & 33% Squares) PAVERS F - CONTROL JOINTS G - HMEDIAN HARDSCAPE TREATMENT IBENCH PAD EXTENSION HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LIGHT POLES N - SPHERICAL BOLLARD I - 4' X 6' MEDIAN PLANTER BLOCKOUT J - HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTLIGHT POLES N - HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT C19 21 HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN LOT 13 WELCOME PLAZA HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALE SS3 24 HERONDO STREETMONTEREY BOULEVARDSTREETVALLEY DRIVEHERONDO FRANCISCA AVENUESIGNING & STRIPING NOTES PARKING STALL MARKINGS DETAIL SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN HERONDO STREET STA. 31+00 TO 50+00 CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK DETAIL HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALE SS4 25 HERONDO HIGHWAYCOASTPACIFICCATALINA AVESTREET ANITA ST SIGNING & STRIPING NOTES PARKING STALL MARKINGS DETAIL SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN HERONDO STREET STA. 50+00 TO PCH CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK DETAIL HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALE SIGNING & STRIPING NOTES ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS G 5 PARKING STALLS F 5 RED CURB DETAIL K 5 LEGEND ACCESSIBLE STALL SIGN J 5 INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY (ISA) MARKING POLE LOCATION DETAILGENERAL NOTESHERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVEGATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTCONDUCTOR SCHEDULEGRAPHIC SCALEPOLE SCHEDULECONSTRUCTION NOTESPROPOSED PHASE DIAGRAMTRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION PLANN. HARBOR DR AND HERONDO ST/YACHT CLUB WYLOAD SWITCHES POLE LOCATION DETAIL GENERAL NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES POLE 4 DETAIL HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE GRAPHIC SCALE (NOT TO SCALE) PHASE DIAGRAM POLE SCHEDULE POLE 1 DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) POLE 5 DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION PLAN N. HARBOR DRIVE AND MARINA WAY PORTOFINO WAYBERYL STREETDRIVENORTH HARBOR 10'4'10' 14' 8' 10' POLE SCHEDULE POLE LOCATION DETAIL PHASE DIAGRAM GENERAL NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES POLE 9 DETAIL HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE GRAPHIC SCALE (NOT TO SCALE) POLE 2 DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) POLE 7 DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) R Y G DETAIL A (NOT TO SCALE)TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION PLAN N. HARBOR DR AND BERYL ST/PORTOFINO WY HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GENERAL NOTES LEGEND LANE CLOSED CLOSED ROAD DETOUR ROUTE GRAPHIC SCALE DETOUR DETOUR AHEAD HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALEHERONDO HARBOR DRIVE NORTH HARBOR MARINA WAYHERMOS A AVENUE YACHT CLUB WAYELECTRICAL NOTES STREETNORTH LEGEND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE HERONDOSTREETDRIVE NOTE: HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALE HARBOR DRIVE PORTOFINO WAYBERYL STREETHARBOR DRIVE PACIFIC AVENUENORTH NORTH ELECTRICAL NOTES CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE LEGEND REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULEPLANT SCHEDULE EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT C1 C2 C3 ET X X PB #" ## IRRIGATION SCHEDULE CRITICAL ANALYSIS CRITICAL ANALYSIS CRITICAL ANALYSIS CRITICAL ANALYSIS EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REDONDO BEACH MAIN GATEWAY MONUMENT N.T.S.D PROP-SI-MON-02 IN-GROUND BIKE RACK INSTALLATION N.T.S.B PROP-SF-BIK-01 TRASH / RECYCLE RECEPTACLE E CONCRETE HEADER - 12" WIDE N.T.S.C PROP-PAV-09 DRAINAGE SUMP AT MEDIAN N.T.S.A MASTER VALVE IN PLASTIC BOX N.T.S.5 PROP-IRR-VAL-02 PIPE TRENCH FOR LATERAL AND MAINLINE N.T.S.1 PROP-IRR-PIP-01 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE IN PLASTIC BOX N.T.S.9 PROP-IRR-VAL-06 BALL VALVE IN PLASTIC BOX N.T.S.2 PROP-IRR-VAL-01 QUICK COUPLING VALVE / IN PLASTIC VALVE BOX N.T.S.3 PROP-IRR-VAL-04 EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MASTER CONTROL VALVE AND FLOW SENSOR ASSEMBLY7 CONTROLLER / COM WIRE PULL BOX N.T.S.4 PROP-IRR-WIR-03 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE/ REGULATOR/FILTER (DRIP) N.T.S.6 PROP-IRR-VAL-10 IRRIGATION CONTROLLER (ICA6) N.T.S.PROP-IRR-CACC-068 EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SLOPED CONDITION NOTE: 1. INSTALL AIR RELIEF VALVE AT HIGHEST POINT. 2. SPACING AS NOTED ON TOP 23 OF SLOPE. 3. SPACING AT BOTTOM 13 AS NOTED PLUS 25%. 4. WHEN ELEVATION CHANGE IS 10 FT OR MORE, ZONE BOTTOM 13 SEPARATELY. MAXIMUM LATERAL LENGTH (FEET) EMITTER FLOW RATE GPH 12" SPACING 18" SPACING 24" SPACING PSI 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 10 125 96 175 135 218 171 20 249 191 350 171 442 340 30 307 236 434 333 550 422 40 350 268 495 380 627 171 50 125 96 175 135 218 171 60 125 96 175 135 218 171 MAXIMUM FLOW PER ZONE MAX GPM PSI LOSS SCHEDULE 40 PVC HEADER SIZE 1/2" 4.7 GPM 7.7 PSI 3/4"8.3 GPM 5.6 PSI 1"13.5 GPM 4.2 PSI 1-1/2"33.9 GPM 2.9 PSI 2"52.4 GPM 1.9 PSI POLY PIPE HEADER SIZE 1/2"4.7 GPM 8.8 PSI 3/4"8.3 GPM 6.3 PSI 1"13.5 GPM 4.8 PSI 1-1/2"31.8 GPM 2.9 PSI 2"52.4 GPM 2.2 PSI GRID PRECIPITATION RATES (IN/HR) EMITTER FLOW RATE EMITTER LATERAL SPACING SPACING 0.6 0.9 12 12 0.96 1.44 18 18 0.69 1.03 24 24 0.28 0.41 TYPICAL DRIP LINE WITH EMITTER SPACING AS NOTED. TIE DOWN STAKE AT ALL TEES, ELLS, AND AT 4' O.C. AT CLAY, 3' O.C. AT LOAM, OR 2' O.C. AT SAND. FLUSH VALVE OR CAP AT LOW END, AS NOTED. F END FEED EXAMPLE A F LATERAL FLOW PER 100 FT (GPM) EMITTER 12"18"24" FLOW SPACING SPACING SPACING 0.6 GPH 1.0 GPM 0.67 GPM 0.50 GPM 0.9 GPH 1.5 GPM 1.0 GPM 0.75 GPM CENTER FEED EXAMPLE A DRIPLINE SPACING AS NOTED. 3/4" PVC LATERAL PIPE. PVC MAINLINE. TYPICAL DRIPLINE LAYOUT REQUIREMENTS N.T.S.1 PROP-IRR-DRI-06 DRIP ZONE FLUSH VALVE N.T.S.PROP-IRR-DRI-033 IRRIGATION HEAD - POP UP N.T.S.PROP-IRR-HEA-034 AIR VACUUM RELIEF VALVE N.T.S.2 PROP-IRR-DRI-02 IRRIGATION - ROOT WATERING SYSTEM N.T.S.PROP-IRR-HEA-025 PALM TREE PLANTING N.T.S.1 TREE STAKING N.T.S.PROP-PLNT-TRE-022 BREATHER/FERTILIZER TUBE N.T.S.3 PROP-PLNT-TRE-06 TREE OR SHRUB PLANTING N.T.S.PROP-PLNT-TRE-014 GROUND COVER TRIANGULAR SPACING N.T.S.5 PROP-PLNT-TRE-08 ROOT BARRIER N.T.S.PROP-PLNT-TRE-076 EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT July 8, 2014 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 2014 HERONDO STREET/HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council; 1. Receive public comment and provide input to Staff regarding the proposed improvements; 2. Receive and File the attached Herondo Street/Harbor Drive Gateway Improvement Project submitted by the City of Redondo Beach; and 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to negotiate the disbursement of funds, not to exceed $21,532, from the General Fund that have been appropriated for “CIP 14- 128 Street Improvements – Various Locations” to the City of Redondo Beach for the rehabilitation of Herondo Street within the boundary of Hermosa. Summary: The Harbor Drive/Herondo Street Gateway Improvement Project will include major aesthetic and streetscape improvements while also providing mobility and traffic safety enhancements for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. Some of the project highlights will include new landscaping, new roadway pavement, new bicycle connectivity to the Hermosa Beach Strand and Hermosa Avenue Sharrows, re-configured parking on Herondo Street to include new “Reverse Angle Parking” which will result in creating 9- new additional parking stalls for Hermosa Beach residents and public, new bike lanes on Herondo Street and Harbor Drive, reconfiguration of travel lanes on Herondo Street to consist of one travel lane in each direction, and the construction of a new “Welcome Park” at Hermosa Avenue and Herondo Street that will link the Hermosa Beach Strand and the new Harbor Drive Cycle Track. The plans have incorporated feedback received from various community meetings and workshops including input provided by Hermosa Beach Staff. Redondo Beach has appropriated the needed funds for construction and will begin advertising for bids towards the end of July 2014. Construction is expected to begin in the Fall of 2014. Background: On November 20, 2012, the Redondo Beach (RB) City Council approved a design and engineering services contract with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for the preparation of plans and specifications for the Herondo Street/Harbor Drive Gateway Improvement Project. Following the award of that contract, three stakeholder workshops (December 19, 2012, January 30, 2013, and February 13, 2013) were held to solicit input on design concepts for the project. Hermosa Beach provided Redondo Beach with a mailing list that included the residences and commercial properties in the attached map. Notices were published and posted on Redondo Beach’s website as well. Additionally, Hermosa Beach held two Public Works Commission meetings and notified residents and businesses using the same mailing list. Those meetings were held March 20, 2013 and January 14, 2014 (minutes included). Herondo Street and Harbor Drive are shared key entry corridors that provide multi-modal transportation access to commercial, recreational, and residential areas within both Cities. Along each of these streets, the existing signage, streetscape, landscaping, pedestrian, and bicycling access are in need of upgrades, including the resurfacing of Herondo Street. The City of Redondo Beach utilized a living streets approach to develop the design concepts supporting the proposed streetscape and transportation improvements along these two corridors. Some of the project highlights include: Harbor Drive Street and Bicycle Improvements Introduction of a Class I (Cycle Track) bicycle lane that will remove potential conflicts between bicyclists, vehicles, and pedestrians at the north and south ends of North Harbor Drive, and to improve bicycle connectivity to Hermosa Beach’s Strand. The introduction of bike sharrows on Harbor Drive that will connect with the sharrows on Hermosa Avenue. New landscaping and way-finding signage Development of a new parkette replacing portion of the existing parking lot adjacent to the Strand entrance Herondo Street Improvements Landscape and aesthetic improvements Class II bicycle lanes Replacement of the asphalt roadway Introduction of reversed angle parking Reduction of two lanes of travel in each direction to one-lane of travel in each direction to generate traffic calming and accommodate new bike lanes Pedestrian safety improvements at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Herondo Street Increase in the number parking stalls Improve driver visibility at Monterey Boulevard and Herondo street Welcome Park Redondo Beach will be converting a portion of the existing parking lot between Yacht Club Way and the Strand to a landscape and pavement textured parkette that will safely connect the new Harbor Drive cycle track to the Hermosa Beach Strand. The new cycle track will “s- curve” through the park and connect to the Strand requiring the removal of the existing wall that currently hampers bicycle connectivity. It is reasonable to expect less combined bicycle and pedestrian traffic along both the Harbor Drive sidewalk and the existing connector sidewalk since more of the bicycle traffic will be now diverted to the new bike path. The existing connector sidewalk (adjacent to the last Strand residence) that extends from Hermosa Avenue/Harbor Drive to the Strand will be replaced with new pedestrian decorative paving and will be incorporated as part of the park. The park will include a significant amount of landscaping amenities. Redondo Beach is also appointing sharrows on Harbor Drive that will provide cyclists a link to the existing Sharrows on Hermosa Avenue. Intersection of Herondo and Hermosa Avenue The project includes the installation of a new crosswalk across Hermosa Avenue (near the corner of the liquor store) that will benefit Hermosa Beach residents. The new crosswalk requires an island due to the geometrical offset of the intersection. Crossing Hermosa Avenue will be a protected pedestrian signal phase and will avoid conflict with vehicles, as vehicles turn left onto Harbor Drive from Herondo Street. Staff had recommended a “pedestrian only” phase for all directions similar to Hermosa and Pier; this was not achievable because of the close proximity of Yacht Club Way requiring the two intersections to be synchronized with each other. Herondo Street Herondo Street will include major aesthetic and streetscape improvements appropriate of a gateway entrance. These improvements, consistent with Hermosa Beach’s Living Streets Policy, will improve accessibility and provide mobility and traffic safety enhancements for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. The street (existing curb and median) geometries will remain unchanged, thus all modifications will consist solely of traffic striping and re-channelization. Other Herondo elements will include new landscaping, new roadway pavement, new Class-II bicycle lanes, re-configured parking on Herondo Street to include new “Reverse Angle Parking” which will result in creating 9-additional parking stalls, and the reconfiguration of travel lanes on Herondo Street to be reduced to one travel lane in each direction. Staff has shared the concerns of the Public Works Commission regarding the feasibility of the reduced travel lanes to accommodate traffic volume with Redondo Beach Staff. Redondo Beach’s traffic analysis has determined and assured that the reduced travel lanes can accommodate a projected 20,000-daily vehicle trips. The current count is approximately 10,000-vehicles per day. This will contribute immensely to traffic calming and significantly enhance driver sight-visibility for vehicles entering Herondo from both Monterey Boulevard and Valley Drive. Staff is currently working to address a sight- distance issue at Monterey Boulevard and Herondo Street. Note that the improvements on Herondo consist primarily of traffic striping and can be easily modified in the future. The project will introduce reverse angle parking at several locations along Herondo Street. The concept is in use in many cities but is a first for the South Bay Region. Reverse angle parking within the Hermosa Beach boundary will extend from Valley Drive to Monterey Boulevard. Reverse angle parking has been found to increase driver visibility especially when exiting and therefore avoids the inability to see oncoming vehicles and bicyclists while backing. Ability to see while backing is especially hindered by SUV’s and/or larger vehicles. Safety benefits to reverse angle parking include accessibility to vehicle trunks and doors from the sidewalk instead of from the street side. Reverse angle parking will seem unfamiliar at first, but should be easier/quicker to park than parallel parking. See the attached Nelson/Nygaard January 2005 report for information and study on reverse angle parking and the Blue Zones Head-Out Angle Parking pamphlet. “Cities that have installed back-in angle parking includes: Seattle (city-wide), Tacoma, Olympia, and Vancouver in Washington; Portland and Salem in Oregon; Tucson, Arizona; Austin, Texas; Salt Lake City; Indianapolis; Washington, D.C.; Pottstown, Pennsylvania; Wilmington, Delaware; and Montreal, Canada. Tucson tracked data for bicycle/car crashes before and after installing back-in angle parking, and found an average of three to four crashes per month with front-in angle parking compared to zero reported bicycle/car crashes for the first four years following implementation of back-in angle parking”1 Other Staff is currently completing plans for the extension of an existing reclaimed water main in Herondo Street to Hermosa Avenue for future irrigation of the medians and to help mitigate drought and water shortage conditions. A service meter will be installed to provide irrigation using reclaimed water to Kay Etow Park as well as the parkway trees to be installed along Herondo. The pipeline will be installed prior to the street improvements on Herondo Street. Funding Redondo Beach has estimated the costs for pavement improvements within the Hermosa Beach Right-of-way along Herondo to be $85,000. Redondo Beach has requested assistance from Hermosa Beach to help offset their costs. The City’s Pavement Management Program identified a budget of approximately $21,532 for Herondo Street which consisted of a Chip Seal strategy. The Herondo Street pavement work is identified in the Pavement Management Program to be done this year (FY14-15). The $21,532 is part of the funding allocated to “CIP 14-128 Street Improvements – Various Locations.” As stated earlier, Hermosa Beach will be constructing a new reclaim water main in Herondo that will provide opportunities for reclaim water service for Redondo Beach. The estimated cost for the reclaim water main is approximately $85,000. Funds for the pipeline are in CIP 14-402 Sewer Improvements project. Staff is working to determine a credit and/or value amount for the pipeline to help offset the amount being requested by Redondo Beach. Other improvements that Hermosa Beach will be undertaking will be the installation of new parkway trees along Herondo that are replacing the large ficus trees that were previously removed by the City. Public Outreach Staff mailed notices to all frontage properties along Herondo Street, Hermosa Avenue, and the Strand between Herondo and 2nd Streets. A notice was also published in the Easy Reader. 1 http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/data/faq_details.cfm?id=3974 , July 11, 2014. Attachment 1 EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Attachment 1 TREE S TREES TREES TREE S 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 14" G A S14"GAS14"GAS14"GAS14"GAS31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+009+0011+0012+0031+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+009+0011+0012+0014"GAS14"GAS14"GAS10"FM10"FM10"FM10"FM10"FM10"FM10"FM10"FM(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)(ABAND.)ECECECECECECECECGAS2"GAS2"GAS2"GAS2"GAS2"GAS2"GASSDSDSDSDWEC10"FM2"ACWTR10"FM10"FM10"FM(SEE SHEET BELOW LEFT)MATCHLINE - STA. 40+00MATCHLINE - STA. 40+00(SEE SHEET ABOVE RIGHT)HERONDO STREET (28.89 FL)(28.15 FL)3 (28.47 FL)A (SEE SHEET C8)MATCHLINE - STA. 50+00ARDMORE AVENUEVALLEY DRI VEN FRANCISCA AVETO STA 43+15.00FR STA 42+85.00 DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH SAPPROVED BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: DATE 38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATEDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FRANK SENTENO, 06/26/2014 1 inch = 40 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 20 40 80 16040 GRAPHIC SCALE 9 CITY BOUNDARY HERONDO STREETMONTEREY BLVDCITY BOUNDARY DISPOSITION NOTES PROTECT IN PLACE ADJUST TO GRADE 4 A B 4 C REMOVE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 4 12 6A 5 5 5 5 SEE DETAIL SHEET 4 C7 12 11 12 11 STREET IMPROVEMENT STA 30+00.00 TO STA 50+00.00 HERONDO STREET 9 11 9 17 STA. 30+51.66 BCMATCHLINE - 17 19 B B 14 SPPWC STD NO 120-2, W=12" CONSTRUCT 6" CURB WITH SHED GUTTER TYPE A3-6 PER STD NO 120-2 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB ONLY TYPE A1-6 PER SPPWC SIZE AND NUMBER. TRENCH AS NEEDED. SEE IRRIGATION PLANS FOR CONSTRUCT IRRIGATION SLEEVES. REPAIR 18 18 18 A A A B A A 21 L=40’ 23 AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND LENGTH WITH CITY ENGINEER STD NO 112-2. LIMITS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR NO 120-2. CONSTRUCT 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER SPPWC CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC STD REMOVE EXISTING AC PATCH OVER FORMER RAILWAY. CONCRETE. SEE DETAIL ON DWG. NO. C16 FOR DETAILS. GREY CHARCOAL COLORED PAVERS AND EASTERN TAN COLORED CONSTRUCT RANDOM PATTERN ISRAEL PEWTER AMBER LIGHT PLAN) AND PER DETAILS DRAWING No. C9 AND C10 CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER SPPWC STD NO 111-5 (TYPE PER 1"=40’ GRIND AND OVERLAY AT JOIN PER DETAIL ON SHEET C12 LUMINAIRE PER DETAIL N ON DWG. NO. C17, C18, E1 & E2 REPLACE STREET LIGHT POLE WITH SINGLE MAST ARM LED RAMP #22 RAMP #23 3 3 TO STA 39+79.35FRO STA 39+39.35 PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. WITH CITY ENGINEER AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND LENGTH STD NO 120-2. LIMITS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. REPLACE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE A2-6 PER SPPWC 21 B2-PG-64-10 (CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH) FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 OVER 3" OF REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH EXIST B2-PG-64-10 FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 OVER 3" OF REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH EXIST 6 6 6 BE PER SPPWC STD 112-2. COLOR EASTERN TAN BY DAVIS. CONSTRUCT 4" CONCRETE MEDIAN PAVING. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL ADJACENT PAVEMENT DEPTH. CONSTRUCT BETWEEN 1"-4" C2-PG-64-10 AC. DEPTH TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVEMENT DEPTH (CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH) CONSTRUCT BETWEEN 1"-4" C2-PG-64-10 AC. DEPTH TO MATCH CCURBC PAVEMENT 5"AC/5"AB C GUTTER CURB & C PAVEMENT 5"AC/5"AB UNITS1, LINE PROJECT NO. 1105, EXISTING LACFCD UNITS1, LINE PROJECT NO. 1105, EXISTING LACFCD (27.46 FL)(42.25 FL)(54.33 FL)(27.91 FL)(30.25 FL)(27.00 FL)(26.46 FL)417(27.71 FL)STA 10+20.03 NORTH HARBOR DR STA 30+00.00 HERONDO ST CL INT =C/L VALLEY DRIVE STA 42+39.64 HERONDO ST CL INT =C/L VALLEY DRIVE STA 42+99.59 HERONDO ST CL INT =C/L ARDMORE AVENUE STA 43+66.35 HERONDO ST CL INT =C/L MONTEREY BLVD STA 35+68.44 HERONDO ST CL INT(13.01 FL)(13.60FL)EXIST JS NO.1 STA 6+87.00 HERMOSA AVENUENORTH HARBOR DRIVEMATCHLINE - STA. 30+57.90 EC(SEE SHEET C3)6A 14 14CL STA 30+59CL STA 31+56(23.62 FL)14CL STA 32+50(12.83 FL)14CL STA 33+41CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY OF REDONDO BEACH 14CL STA 34+3214CL STA 40+7314CL STA 35+3314CL STA 36+25A 14CL STA 37+1214CL STA 38+0314CL STA 38+9514CL STA 41+7214CL STA 39+8414CL STA 42+8123 14CL STA 43+29(1 5.05 FL)(26.54 FL)(28.28 FL)14CL STA 44+13AB(32.90 FL)14CL STA 45+11(42.79 FL)(54.91 FL)(27.43 FL)(24.32 FL)(1 5.67 FL) 14CL STA 46+37TO STA 46+50.00FR STA 46+00.04(28.57 F L)(42.04 FL)(54.12FL)(27.02 FL)(23.48 FL)(14.62 FL)(26.03 FL)14CL STA 47+64(43.04 FL)(54.97 FL)(27.45 FL)(23.99 FL)(15.24 FL)21 L=50’ 14CL STA 48+924 4 4 4 19 19 19 19 3 21 (27.80 F L) (28.96 F L) L=30’TO STA 45+38.00FR STA 45+00.0021 L=30’ L=49.96’ L=38’ Attachment 1 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 14"GAS14"GAS14"GAS14"GAS8"OIL8"OIL8"OIL8"OIL4"OIL4"OIL4"OIL4"OILN. CATALINA AVEHERONDO STREET PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY19 14 DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH SAPPROVED BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: DATE 38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATEDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FRANK SENTENO, 06/26/2014 1 inch = 40 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 20 40 80 16040 GRAPHIC SCALE 10 CITY BOUNDARY 5 MATCHLINE - STA. 50+00(SEE SHEET C7)CONSTRUCTION NOTES 4 5 C8 5 CONCRETE. SEE DETAIL ON DWG. NO. C16 FOR DETAILS. GREY CHARCOAL COLORED PAVERS AND EASTERN TAN COLORED CONSTRUCT RANDOM PATTERN ISRAEL PEWTER AMBER LIGHT 1"=40’ GRIND AND OVERLAY AT JOIN PER DETAIL ON SHEET C12 NOTE: (SEE NOTE *) BOUNDARY CALTRANS * RIGHT-OF-WAY. CALTRANS FOR WORK PERFORMED WITHIN STATE OF CALIFORNIA PERMIT AND PROVIDE APPLICABLE INSURANCE AS REQUIRED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR CALTRANS ENCROACHMENT LUMINAIRE PER DETAIL N ON DWG. NO. C17, C18, E1 & E2 REPLACE STREET LIGHT POLE WITH SINGLE MAST ARM LED B2-PG-64-10 FINISHED SURFACE WITH 2" C2-PG-64-10 OVER 3" OF REMOVE 5" OF PAVEMENT AND REPLACE TO MATCH EXIST (66.94 FL)STREET IMPROVEMENT STA 50+00.00 TO STA 52+71.91 HERONDO STREETEND PROJECTSTA 52+71.91(76.35 FL)(71.57 FL)CL PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY STA 53+06.88 HERONDO ST CL INT EXIST COLD JOINT LINE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY OF REDONDO BEACH 19 14CL STA 50+18(66.65 FL)(67.03 FL)19(66.95 FL)14CL STA 51+424 4 ( 7 1 . 4 5 F L)(72.12 FL)(72.19 FL)(75.12 FL)(76.09 FL)(76.06 FL)Attachment 1 TREES13.213.514.51515 PM 2 0 2031+00 32+00 33+00 DRAWN CHECKED SCALE APPROVED BY DATE PROJECT NO.DRAWING NO.SHEET NO. OF SHEETS CITY ENGINEER - R.C.E. REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE 10/2013 47 AB, RS, SC, SR RM, SW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION Exp. CIVIL AINROFILACFOETATSREENIGN ELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER 3/31/16 No. 41751 NOSKNABYRREH SAPPROVED BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: DATE 38 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92618 949.923.6000 stantec.com SHERRY BANKSON RCE 41751 DATEDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FRANK SENTENO, 01/16/2013 NO.R L T 1 10 14 6 8 12 15 15 20 9428’48" 10645’57" 0510’27" 7620’12" 0542’38" 2.00’3.30’2.16’ 2.00’3.73’2.69’ 50.00’4.52’2.26’ 2.00’2.66’1.57’ 29.90’14.96’300.00’ 1 inch = 10 ft. ( IN FEET ) 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 13 C11 STA 10+20.03 NORTH HARBOR DR STA 30+00.00 HERONDO ST CL INTHERMOSA AVENUENORTH HARBOR DRIVECITY OF REDONDO BEACH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY BOUNDARY13.20’ FS13.70’ TC35.14’ LTSTA 30+27.02 BC13.15’ FS13.65’ TC36.70’ LTSTA 30+30.39 PCC13.20’ FS13.70’ TC32.33’ LTSTA 30+35.70 PCC13.22’ FS13.72’ TC30.75’ LTSTA 30+36.53 BC2 3 4 5 BEARING/DELTA 9 11 12 16 17 18 19 14 13 19 S2223’5"E 3.83’ 8.65’ 50.00’4.52’2.26’ 16 18 17 S2427’23"W -- S6532’36"W -- 2021 22 21 85.54’ S6850’44"W -102.32’- S6308’06"W -- 13 22 -10.88’-S2223’5"E CURVE/LINE DATA NO.R L T 1 2 3 7 8 11 13645’19"2.00’4.77’5.05’ 11136’26" 11435’30" 13.36’ 8.94’ 2.00’2.94’ 50.00’17.78’8.99’ 76.62’ 3.9’ 4 6 5 8.43’ 11435’30" 5312’03" 50.00’6.88’3.45’ 2.00’1.86’1.00’ BEARING/DELTA N2427’23W -- S6532’36"W -- S2223’05"E -- 9 58.37’ 10 17417’22"2.00’6.08’40.10’ N6850’44"E -- S6308’06"W -- CURVE/LINE DATA13.37’ FS13.87’ TC21.80’ LTSTA 30+27.28 < PT7 13.31’ FS13.81’ TC22.31’ LTSTA 30+36.71 < PT13.39’ FS13.89’ TC13.81’ LTSTA 30+28.25 < PT13.36’ FS13.86’ TC14.31’ LTSTA 30+36.89 < PT13.38’ FS13.88’ TC11.55’ LTSTA 30+36.95 EC13.40’ FS13.90’’ TC9.58’ LTSTA 30+35.46 PCC13.41’ FS13.91’ TC8.22’ LTSTA 30+31.16 PCC13.41’ FS13.91’ TC9.98’ LTSTA 30+28.47 BC13.33’ FS13.83’ TC24.21’ LTSTA 30+44.68 BC13.45’ FS13.95’ TC13.33’ LTSTA 30+44.91 BC13.50’ FS14.00’ TC11.39’ LTSTA 30+47.11 EC13.97’ FS14.47’ TC19.01’ LTSTA 31+23.35 BC13.90’ FS14.40’ TC23.00’ LTSTA 31+23.15 EC13.46’ FS13.96’ TC21.65’ LTSTA 30+78.07 BCC13.33’ FS13.83’ TC26.13’ LTSTA 30+47.37 BCC13.67’ FS14.17’ TC’ 2.00’ RTSTA 30+53.95 EC14.41’ FS14.91’ TC6.51’ LTSTA 31+39.06 BC14.66’ FS15.16’ TC8.00’ LTSTA 31+68.91 EC17.72’ FS18.22’ TC8.00’ LTSTA 32+71.23 PTJOIN EXISTCONSTRUCTION DETAILS SPLINTER ISLAND HERONDO MEDIAN AND 10 5 10 20 40 1"=10’ Attachment 1 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALE LEGEND GRADING AND PAVING CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES SECTION A-A SECTION B-B SECTION C-C SECTION D-D SECTION E-E SECTION F-F Attachment 1 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALE SS3 24 HERONDO STREETMONTEREY BOULEVARDSTREETVALLEY DRIVEHERONDO FRANCISCA AVENUESIGNING & STRIPING NOTES PARKING STALL MARKINGS DETAIL SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN HERONDO STREET STA. 31+00 TO 50+00 CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK DETAIL Attachment 1 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALE SS4 25 HERONDO HIGHWAYCOASTPACIFICCATALINA AVESTREET ANITA ST SIGNING & STRIPING NOTES PARKING STALL MARKINGS DETAIL SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN HERONDO STREET STA. 50+00 TO PCH CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK DETAIL Attachment 1 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALE SIGNING & STRIPING NOTES ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS G 5 PARKING STALLS F 5 RED CURB DETAIL K 5 LEGEND ACCESSIBLE STALL SIGN J 5 INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY (ISA) MARKING Attachment 1 POLE LOCATION DETAILGENERAL NOTESHERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVEGATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTCONDUCTOR SCHEDULEGRAPHIC SCALEPOLE SCHEDULECONSTRUCTION NOTESPROPOSED PHASE DIAGRAMTRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION PLANN. HARBOR DR AND HERONDO ST/YACHT CLUB WYLOAD SWITCHESAttachment 1 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULEPLANT SCHEDULE EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Attachment 1 EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Attachment 1 EXP. 10-31-15 ER ATSGREISTE ICOFALET OF R N AICDNASDL EPA AHCETCITRA. Stevens Cook II No. 4053 HERONDO STREET / HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Attachment 2 ACTION MINUTES PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2014 CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1315 VALLEY DRIVE COMMISIONERS Janice Brittain Julian Katz Kimberlee MacMullan Richard Stapp Rob Saemann All public testimony and the deliberations of the Public Works Commission can be viewed on the City’s website at http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=358. 1. Call to Order 7:00 PM 2. Flag Salute 3. Roll Call Present: Chairperson Brittain, Commissioner MacMullan, Commissioner Stapp, and Commissioner Saemann Absent: Commissioner Katz Also present: Frank Senteno, Director of Public Works; Ells Freeman, Public Works Superintendent; Victor Chavez, Assistant Engineer; and Liz Zeigler, Administrative Assistant. 4. Approval of Action Minutes: November 20, 2013 ACTION: To approve the minutes as presented. MOTION to approve the minutes of November 20, 2013, seconded and the motion carried by a unanimous vote. 5. Public Comment: Anyone wishing to address the Commission on items not on the agenda and pertaining to Public Works may do so at this time. No action. 6. Correspondence None 7. Presentations None 8. Items for Consideration a. 2014 Public Works Commission Meeting Schedule MOTION was made to accept the Public Works Commission Meeting 2014 Schedule as presented, seconded and the motion carried by a unanimous vote (4-0). b. Herondo Street/Harbor Drive Gateway Improvement Project MOTION was made by Commissioner Saemann to receive and file the status update on the City of Redondo Beach Herondo Street / Harbor Drive Gateway Improvement Project; and to approve the planting of Crape Myrtles (Light Lavender) along Herondo Street in City of Hermosa Beach City limits as Attachment 2 recommended by the Engineering staff to be consistent with the Redondo Beach street medians landscape theme; motion was seconded, and the motion carried by unanimous vote (4-0). Staff took note of the following concerns expressed by the Commissioners regarding the design of the City of Redondo Beach Herondo Street / Harbor Drive Gateway Improvement Project: • potential hazards to motorists and bicyclists and traffic jams caused by the reverse angle parking • lack of a traffic study on the impact of reverse angle parking • removal of parking to add a park along the bike path • lack of sufficient public education regarding new bike lanes and reverse angle parking on Herondo • location of the bike lane between the lane of traffic and the parking spaces; Commissioners suggested the bike lane might be better positioned next to the median or between the sidewalk and parking so that bicyclists are fully protected Staff agreed to discuss the above mentioned items with the City of Redondo Beach. c. Proposed Five-Year Capital Improvement Program – Fiscal Years 2014-15 Through FY 2018-19 MOTION was made by Commissioner Saemann to support the draft Five-Year Capital Improvement Program – Fiscal Years 2014-15 through 2018-19, Commissioner Stapp seconded, and the motion carried unanimously (4-0). 9. Commissioners’ Reports – No Action 10. Monthly Reports a. Monthly Activity Report – October 2013 and November 2013 b. Project Status Reports – October 2013 and November 2013 Above items are presented for information purposes only. c. Verbal Capital Improvement Report by Mr. Senteno No Action 11. Commissioners’ Announcements – No Action 12. The Regular Meeting of the Public Works Commission for January 15, 2014 was adjourned at 8:37p.m. to the Regular meeting of Wednesday, March 19, 2014 at 7 pm. Attachment 2 Back-in/Head-out Angle Parking Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 785 Market Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94103 January 2005 Attachment 3 Back-in/Head-out Angle Parking Page i • Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Table of Contents PAGE Introduction.....................................................................................................................1 Some examples.................................................................................................................1 Advantages.......................................................................................................................4 Bicyclists.......................................................................................................................4 Visibility........................................................................................................................5 Steep terrain..................................................................................................................5 Disabled parking...........................................................................................................5 Safety............................................................................................................................6 Cities using back-in/head-out angle parking......................................................................6 Typical dimensions...........................................................................................................7 References........................................................................................................................8 Appendix A Nawn, J.A. (2003) Central Business District Back In Angle Parking. PE Reporter, November/December Issue, P. 11-13. Appendix B City Of Pottstown (2001) Proposed High-Street Traffic Calming Plan. Appendix C City Of Vancouver (2004) Angle Back In Parking Striping. Appendix D City Of Seattle (2005) Angle Back In Parking Dimensions. Table of Figures PAGE Figure 1 Back-in/Head-out parking in Tucson, AZ........................................................2 Figure 2 With back-in angle parking you can load your car on the curb, rather than in the street (Vancouver, WA)............................................................................2 Figure 3 An ‘eye-to-eye’ line of sight between parker and approaching road-user (Vancouver, WA)...........................................................................................3 Figure 4 The parker’s view of the on-coming traffic (Vancouver, WA).........................3 Figure 5 A traffic sign showing the three steps of back-in angle parking, in Kelowna, BC, Canada. ..................................................................................................4 Figure 6 A disabled parking stall located right next to the pedestrian crossing and the curb ramp......................................................................................................5 Figure 7 Cities using back-in/head-out angle parking. ..................................................6 Figure 8 Cross-section of a roadway accommodating both bike lanes and back-in/head- out angle parking...........................................................................................7 Attachment 3 Back-in/Head-out Angle Parking Page 1 • Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Introduction In recent years the use of back-in/head-out angle parking has increased steadily in cities across North America. There are several reasons for this development. Kulash and Lockwood (2003) state that: “Back-in/head-out diagonal parking is superior to conventional head-in/back-out diagonal parking. Both types of diagonal parking have common dimensions, but the back-in/head- out is superior for safety reasons due to better visibility when leaving. This is particularly important on busy streets or where drivers find their views blocked by large vehicles, tinted windows, etc., in adjacent vehicles in the case of head-in/back-out angled parking. In other words, drivers do not back blindly into an active traffic lane. The back-in maneuver is simpler than a parallel parking maneuver. Furthermore, with back-in/head-out parking, the open doors of the vehicle block pedestrian access to the travel lane and guide pedestrians to the sidewalk, which is a safety benefit, particularly for children. Further, back-in/head- out parking puts most cargo loading (into trunks, tailgates) on the curb, rather than in the street.” The growing presence on American streets of sport utility vehicles (SUVs), with their bulky rear ends and (frequently) tinted windows may have spurred the trend toward back- in/head-out angle parking: when using conventional angle parking, drivers increasingly find themselves beside an SUV, with more difficult sightlines. This report briefly discusses the design and benefits of back-in/head-out angle parking and shows where the design has already been implemented. Some examples In Tucson, AZ, two blocks of reverse diagonal parking have been installed along the University Boulevard Bikeway (see Figure 1), which leads into the west entrance of the University of Arizona (~36,000 students). In the two years of reverse diagonal parking, there have been no accidents along the segment, despite the large number of cyclists using the bikeway. Figures 2-4 illustrate some of the benefits of back-in/head-out angle parking. In Figure 2 the driver is able access her trunk from the curb rather than from the street. Figures 3 and 4 show that the driver can have eye contact with oncoming traffic, in this case a bicyclist. Figure 5 shows typical signage used to introduce drivers to back-in/head-out angle parking. For more examples on back-in/head-out angle parking, see Appendices A and B. Attachment 3 Back-in/Head-out Angle Parking Page 2 • Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Figure 1 Back-in/Head-out parking in Tucson, AZ. Source: T. Boulanger, Transportation Services, City of Vancouver, WA. Figure 2 With back-in angle parking you can load your car on the curb, rather than in the street (Vancouver, WA). Source: T. Boulanger, Transportation Services, City of Vancouver, WA. Attachment 3 Back-in/Head-out Angle Parking Page 3 • Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Figure 3 An ‘eye-to-eye’ line of sight between parker and approaching road-user (Vancouver, WA). Source: T. Boulanger, Transportation Services, City of Vancouver, WA. Figure 4 The parker’s view of the on-coming traffic (Vancouver, WA). Source: T. Boulanger, Transportation Services, City of Vancouver, WA. Attachment 3 Back-in/Head-out Angle Parking Page 4 • Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Figure 5 A traffic sign showing the three steps of back-in angle parking, in Kelowna, BC, Canada. Source: City of Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada. Advantages Back-in/head-out angle parking is similar to both parallel and standard angle parking. As with parallel parking, the driver enters the stall by stopping and backing, but need not maneuver the front of the vehicle against the curb. When leaving the stall, the driver can simply pull out of the stall, and has a better view of the oncoming traffic. Bicyclists This type of parking provides a safer environment for bicyclists using the roadways. The driver is able to see the cyclist easily when exiting the stall. Several cities where back-in angle parking has been implemented have seen a reduction in number of accidents compared to the number of accidents at regular parallel parking schemes. Matt Zoll at Attachment 3 Back-in/Head-out Angle Parking Page 5 • Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Tucson-Pima County Bicycle Advisory Committee says that after implementing the back- in/head-out angle parking scheme in Tucson they “went from an average of 3-4 bike/car accidents per month to no reported accidents for 4 years following implementation.” Visibility In contrast to standard angle parking the visibility while exiting a back-in/head-out angle parking into traffic is much improved. When the driver is backing up (into the stall), the driver is in control of his lane: traffic behind either waits, or changes lanes. Steep terrain Back-in angle parking can also be useful on steep terrain: if used on the correct side of the street, it causes drivers to automatically curb their wheels, which in turn prevents runaway autos. Used on the wrong side of a steep street, however, it is likely to cause more runaways. Disabled parking In Pottstown, PE, a 13-foot wide handicap accessible stall has been incorporated into the angle parking as the last space, intersection nearside, of each block. This places each disabled parking stall close to the existing curb ramps, and allows the wheelchair-using drivers to unload out of the way of traffic (see Figure 6). By contrast, the street’s previous parallel parking arrangement could not be safely used for disabled parking, and conventional angle parking raised safety concerns for the street’s proposed bicycle lanes. Figure 6 A disabled parking stall located right next to the pedestrian crossing and the curb ramp. Back-in angle parking stalls Attachment 3 Back-in/Head-out Angle Parking Page 6 • Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Safety As SLCTrans (2004) states, “one of the most common causes of accidents is people backing out of standard angled parking without being able to see on-coming traffic. Reverse angled parking removes this difficulty.” It also improves safety for cyclists, and for loading/and unloading the trunk of the car. Similarly, the Urban Transportation Monitor’s recent article on back-in angle parking reported reduced accidents and benefits for bicyclists in several communities. In all, back-in/head-out angle parking is a good choice when compared to conventional head-in angle/back-out parking and parallel parking. Cities using back-in/head-out angle parking The list of cities in North America that use back-in/head-out angle parking is growing. Figure 7 lists some of these communities. Figure 7 Cities using back-in/head-out angle parking. City Source Arlington, VI Dan Burden Walkable Communities, Inc. Birmingham, AL Russ Soyring City of Traverse City, MI Burnaby, Canada Dan Burden Walkable Communities, Inc. Charlotte, NC Dan Burden Walkable Communities, Inc. Chico, CA Patrick Siegman Nelson\Nygaard Everett, WA Michael M. Moule Livable Streets, Inc Honolulu, HI Dan Burden Walkable Communities, Inc. Indianapolis, IN Michael M. Moule Livable Streets, Inc Knoxville, TN Michael M. Moule Livable Streets, Inc Marquette, MI Russ Soyring City of Traverse City, MI Montreal, Canada Michael M. Moule Livable Streets, Inc New York, NY Dan Burden Walkable Communities, Inc. Olympia, WA Dan Burden Walkable Communities, Inc. Plattsburgh, NY Dan Burden Walkable Communities, Inc. Portland, OR Michael M. Moule Livable Streets, Inc Pottstown, PA Michael M. Moule Livable Streets, Inc Salem, OR Todd Boulanger City of Vancouver, WA Salt Lake City, UT Dan Burden Walkable Communities, Inc. San Francisco, CA Michael M. Moule Livable Streets, Inc Seattle, WA Dan Burden Walkable Communities, Inc. Tacoma, WA Dan Burden Walkable Communities, Inc. Tucson, AZ Michael M. Moule Livable Streets, Inc Vancouver, WA Todd Boulanger City of Vancouver, WA Ventura, CA Todd Boulanger City of Vancouver, WA Washington, DC Dan Burden Walkable Communities, Inc. Wilmington, DE Michael M. Moule Livable Streets, Inc Attachment 3 Back-in/Head-out Angle Parking Page 7 • Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Typical dimensions Particularly when accommodating bike lanes within the roadway, back-in/head-out angle parking is useful. Figure 8 shows the cross-section of such a roadway in Pottstown, PA. Appendix C and D shows Vancouver’s, WA, and Seattle’s, WA, choices of dimensions for this type of parking. Figure 8 Cross-section of a roadway accommodating both bike lanes and back-in/head-out angle parking. Source: City of Pottstown (2001) Proposed High Street Traffic Calming Plan. Attachment 3 Back-in/Head-out Angle Parking Page 8 • Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates References City of Pottstown (2001) Proposed High Street Traffic Calming Plan. City of Pottstown (2004) Back In Angle as a Way to Improve Pedestrian Circulation in the Central Business District High Street, Pottstown Borough, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, USA. City of Vancouver, WA (2004) Angle Back In Parking Striping. Standard Plan Number T29- 62. Kulash, W. M. and Lockwood, I.M. (2003) Time-saver Standards for Urban Design, 7.2—5, McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, New York. Nawn, J. (2003) Central Business District Back In Angle Parking. November/December PE Reporter, pages 11-13. SLCTrans, Salt Lake City, UT (2004) Back-in or Reverse Angle Parking - FAQ. http://www.slcgov.com/transportation/Aboutus/FAQ.htm. Urban Transportation Monitor. Back-in Angle Parking. June 11, 2004, page 1. Attachment 3 APPENDIX A NAWN, J.A. (2003) CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT BACK IN ANGLE PARKING. PE REPORTER, NOVEMBER/DECEMBER ISSUE, P. 11-13. Attachment 3 Pennsylvania Society of Professional Engineers November/December PE Reporter ■ 11 Central Business District Back In Angle Parking John A. Nawn, P.E., PTOE In August 2003, the Pottstown borough completed back in angle parking along the main street thorough its central business district (CBD). This is the first such application of back in angle parking in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. In many community’s central business districts, lack of parking close to retail and commercial establishments is seen as a deterrent to continued retail development and reinvestment into the CBD. In many instances, the CBD is also bisected by an urban arterial, or “Main Street.” Competing needs of parking versus efficient vehicle movement can impede mobility and sometimes compromise safety. Since the middle 1990’s, the Borough of Pottstown, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, has struggled to revitalize and reinvigorate its downtown core. The Borough’s 1994 Downtown Comprehensive Plan identified several goals for revitalization, specifically dealing with creation of a pedestrian friendly, multi-modal environment while maximizing the amount of parking and its proximity to retail establishments that line the downtown core. Through leveraging of and improvement to the existing transportation infrastructure, the community attempted to realize these goals. Located in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania metropolitan area and situated on the Schuylkill River, the Borough of Pottstown traces its routes to 1752. As the Borough developed, the CBD developed centered along High Street, making High Street the Borough’s main street. At 5.5 square miles, Pottstown population is 21,859 (2000 census). Following the increase in automobile traffic after World War II, the High Street cross section was reconfigured to maximize automobile mobility. With 68 feet available between the curb lines, two 11-foot through lanes and a 7-foot parallel parking lane were created in each direction along with a 10-foot wide center turn lane/ painted median. Combined with a 16-foot sidewalk on each side, the face of the buildings on each side of the street are 100 feet apart, creating a very wide corridor through the CBD. The width of the corridor is visually perceived by some to be a deterrent to downtown redevelopment. In 1972, a four lane, grade separated, limited access freeway, U.S. Route 422, was constructed along the opposite side of the river from the Borough, essentially bypassing the CBD and drawing large amounts of the existing through traffic volume from High Street. High Street quickly became an underutilized transportation asset. As a highway facility, High Street was an operational success. The 85th percentile speeds were within 5 miles per hour of the posted speeds and an attractive level of service was maintained for vehicles. However, High Street was failing to meet more recent and progressive economic development and transportation goals endorsed at local, state, and national levels. Increasing pedestrian traffic is one of the key objectives in the Borough’s efforts to revitalize the CBD. However, High Street’s configuration impeded these efforts. With four lanes of rapidly moving traffic, it was neither pedestrian nor shopper friendly. High Street’s 68-foot cross-section was intimidating and discouraged pedestrians and shoppers from crossing the street. Pedestrian injuries and deaths were not uncommon. In addition, vehicle traffic along High Street moved too quickly to allow passengers adequate time to identify shopping opportunities and find a parking space. Downtown business owners identified a perceived lack of parking as a concern. Although metered, parallel parking was available on both sides of High Street throughout the CBD, it was generally 50% “Back-in” continued on p. 12 As a highway facility, High Street was an operational success... however, High Street was failing to meet more recent and progressive economic development and transportation goals. Attachment 3 12 ■ PE Reporter November/December 2003 Pennsylvania Society of Professional Engineers utilized and, therefore, considered to be insufficient in addressing the potential needs of the downtown businesses, considering the number of vacancies. While a number of small surface lots had been created along High Street, the linear nature of the CBD makes this parking convenient to only adjacent businesses with long walks necessary for all other businesses. One of the region’s transportation goals is to encourage the use of bicycles as an alternative to the automobile. High Street had been designated by Montgomery County as an official Bicycle Route connecting Pottstown with other communities along the Schuylkill River corridor. But, in its former configuration, High Street was not conducive to bicycle travel with no dedicated bike lanes and swiftly moving vehicular traffic. State and regional plans recognize the connection between revitalizing older communities and solving the problems of traffic congestion on our roads and highways. Encouraging people to live, work and shop in denser, walkable communities fosters the use of existing public transportation, helps reduce sprawl and relieves the pressure on our road system. Creating vibrant downtowns in our cities and smaller urban communities ensures a growing demand for public transportation. Therefore, the general thinking was that reconfiguring and calming traffic on High Street would address Pottstown’s own economic development goals and have a positive impact on regional transportation and growth issues. Clearly if the Borough was to increase pedestrian traffic and attract new business to the CBD, while not reducing available parking, the existing automobile and truck traffic would have to be calmed. The CBD study area generally encompassed a 1.1-mile corridor centered along High Street. Within this corridor, there are 10 signalized intersections. Of those, only two were equipped with pedestrian push buttons; side streets were not actuated; and all signals were uncoordinated, operating on fixed time cycles with side street phases sufficient to also support lengthy pedestrian times required to cross High Street. Improvements would include coordination of the signals and the addition of pedestrian push buttons to improve mobility and support the thorough lane reduction necessary to support additional angle parking. One method used to provide more parking is creation of traditional, pull-in angle parking. However, in order to properly implement traditional angle parking, a substantial amount of right-of-way is necessary to provide the proper maneuver space for vehicles to back out of the spaces without impeding traffic flow on the adjacent roadway. With traditional angle parking in place on both sides of a main street, the width of the street and subsequently pedestrian crossing distances become excessive, creating a non-unified downtown unattractive to pedestrians; pedestrians who are critical to the success of the retail and commercial establishments in the CBD. At signalized intersections, pedestrian crossing times can be excessive, leading to decreased vehicle mobility and progression. More typically, the width of available right-of-way is insufficient to support angle parking. While the angle of the parking can be reduced to narrow the required width of street, as the parking angle becomes more acute, the angle- parking yield becomes not much more than that with parallel parking. Ideally, angle parking without the wide maneuver space would address the problem. It was clear that if the Borough wished to leverage additional parking and a friendlier pedestrian environment as a means to revitalize the downtown area, that conventional methods and thinking would not likely meet those goals. The concept of employing reverse angle or back in angle parking was initiated by the Borough’s Planning Commission and upon request from the Commission, the Borough commissioned a new study to evaluate the appropriateness of back in angle parking on High Street. The initial plan was to establish minimum required lane widths for the conventional elements of the roadway cross- section. In accordance with PennDOT’s criteria for an urban arterial, the minimum acceptable width for through lanes is 11 feet. The center median/turn lane would remain, as it was critical to maintaining the necessary levels of service. PennDOT’s minimum criterion for auxiliary lanes is 10 feet, therefore leaving 36 feet of the 68-foot width available to support the parking and bicycle lanes. PennDOT has detailed regulations governing implementation of angle parking on state highways and specifies a minimum width for parking and maneuver space. With 36 feet available, it would be possible to implement angle parking on one side of the street only, with 6 feet available for a single bike lane. Downtown stakeholders were not inclined to limit parking to one side of the street. Furthermore, with parking provided on only one side of the street, the question was raised as to how drivers proceeding in the opposite direction would be able to utilize the spaces. There was little interest in reducing the angle of the spaces as the additional yield, as noted previously, was not sufficient to justify the installation of the angled spaces. Having determined that angle parking would likely only be possible on one side of the street, the decision was made retain parallel parking on the opposite side. It was also determined at this point to set a minimum width for the bicycle lane, in accordance with AASHTO criteria, which “Back-in” continued from p. 11 Attachment 3 Pennsylvania Society of Professional Engineers November/December PE Reporter ■ 13 recommend a width for two directional travel of 12 feet. This width was also consistent with PennDOT’s criteria. With all the other minimum widths established and agreed upon, this left 18 feet for angle parking. In order to maximize the amount of parking, it was decided to utilize an 8 foot, 6 inch (2.59 meter) wide space, which is consistent with National Parking Association (NPA) criteria for a 45-degree angle space. The available 18-foot width, however did not meet PennDOT’s minimum criteria. The design team, lead by John A. Nawn, P.E., PTOE, in meetings with the Department, pointed out that PennDOT standards did not specify whether the angle parking criteria applied to traditional pull in or back in angle parking, and since there were no examples of back in angle parking in Pennsylvania, it was clear that the PennDOT criteria only applied to pull in angle parking. It was agreed that a maneuver area was necessary for traditional pull in angle spaces so vehicles can re-enter the roadway safely. When backing up from a pull in angle space, an operator temporarily has no view of approaching traffic dependent upon the length of his or her vehicle and the length and composition of the vehicle to the right. The maneuver area is necessary to provide the operator a safe place to back into during this essentially blind reverse maneuver. However, with back in angle parking, it was argued that no such maneuver area was necessary since vehicles exit forward. The human biomechanical motion necessary to enter a back in angle parking space is similar too, if not easier than entering a parallel parking space. The prescribed method for entering a parallel parking space entails three distinct steps. First, the operator pulls past the parking space. Second, the operator proceeds in reverse into the space, on a diagonal, as far as possible. Third, the operator pulls forward while turning toward the right to bring the vehicle parallel to the curb. The second step, wherein the operator pulls backwards into the parallel space, typically places the vehicle at an approximate 45-degree angle with the travel lane. For a 45 degree back in angle space therefore, the operator only needs to complete the first two steps of the typical parallel parking maneuver wherein the operator pulls past the space, than proceeds in reverse into the space, completing the move. When leaving the space to re-enter the highway, the back in angle space has a clear advantage over the parallel parking space. When exiting a parallel parking space, an operator must turn his or her field of vision up to 180 degrees and look backward to be able to view approaching vehicles and identify gaps in which to re-enter the traffic stream. In pulling out from a 45 degree angle space, the maximum that the operator must turn his field of vision is 135 degrees to be able to see approaching vehicles from his left. This movement requires only that the operator turn sideways, not backwards presenting a slightly more ‘comfortable’ position for the operator. Based on the above discussion, it was successfully presented to the Department that given the fact that it is theoretically easier to enter and exit a back in angle parking space than a parallel parking space, and no maneuver area is typically required for parallel parking lanes in an urban zone, accordingly, no additional maneuver area would be necessary nor should be required for back in angle parking. The proposed layout was approved by the Borough Council and endorsed by three local, downtown organizations, and the County. The plan was also conditionally approved by PennDOT. Design of the project was funded partially by a grant from the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC), through their competitive Transportation and Community Development Initiative (TCDI) program. Implementation of the re-designed striping was carefully orchestrated to follow a planned maintenance resurfacing of High Street. The decision as to which side of the street to locate the back in angle parking on was cause for much discussion among the stakeholders. Ultimately, the decision was based entirely on which side would yield the biggest increase in parking, and that was found to be the north side of High Street. The additional parking yield over the existing parallel parking, per block, varied greatly depending on the location of driveways, no parking zones and the like, with some blocks gaining as many as 23 spaces and some blocks as few as 2 spaces. Overall, the downtown area gained a total of 95 new spaces, a 21% increase over existing conditions. In addition to parking changes, existing electromechanical signal controllers were replaced with new, solid state controllers and coordinated with each other to accommodate the through lane reduction necessary to accommodate the new parking and bike lane. This context sensitive solution demonstrates that back in angle parking can be effectively integrated into the downtown environment and co-exist along an arterial highway employing current, minimum design standards. In addition to creating more parking over traditional parallel parking, back in angle parking can also be used as a traffic calming/street narrowing tool, can enhance pedestrian functionality and walk-ability within the downtown area and can work harmoniously with bicycle lanes, all resulting in a more attractive and intimate downtown corridor enhancing the downtown experience and leading to increased economic investment. ■ John A. Nawn, P.E., PTOE was the Project Manager for the Back In Angle Parking design and installation and had been associated with the project and the Borough’s efforts since 1995. Mr. Nawn holds a Bachelor of Science Degree from Drexel University, and is currently employed by URS Corporation the Branch Manager of their Philadelphia Office. John, a licensed professional engineer in four states and a certified professional traffic operations engineer, has over 16 years experience in traffic engineering and has been a member of PSPE since 1990. John is currently the President of the Delaware County Chapter of the Pennsylvania Society of Professional Engineers. The project was presented at and appears in the proceedings of both the Second Urban Street Symposium (a Transportation Research Board conference) and the 2003 Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Conference. For more information please contact Mr. Nawn at, 215-587-9000 x3000 or john_nawn@urscorp.com. Attachment 3 APPENDIX B CITY OF POTTSTOWN (2001) PROPOSED HIGH-STREET TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN. Attachment 3 1. Wilmington, Delaware Contact person: Thomas Warrington Department of Public Works 900 E 11th ST Wilmington, DE 19802 302.571.4233 The City of Wilmington, Delaware, has six blocks of 60 and 90-degree back-in angle parking dating back about 50 years. By city ordinance, Wilmington requires all angle parking to be back- in because of the safety factor. For 60-degree angle parking, regulations require 19 feet out from the curb for parking spaces, to allow for vehicles with extended cabs, plus a minimum of 11 feet for a travel lane, for a total of 30 feet for traffic going in one direction. The highest average daily traffic for any block with angle parking is the 1000 block of Market Street, with an ADT of 6,500 vehicles. Wilmington has not experienced any significant problems with accidents or impediments to travel flow with angle parking. (See attached letter from Thomas Warrington.) Attachment 3 2.Seattle, Washington Contact person: Bill Jack Seattle Transportation Municipal Building, Room 410 600 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 206.684.8329. The City of Seattle, Washington, has about 280 blocks of angle parking spaces, most of which are back-in. Seattle also has pull-in angle parking, but prefers back-in angle parking because it is safer, especially for pedestrians. North Queen Anne Street, shown above, is one of the higher volume traffic streets, with about 6,500 ADT. Seattle has had back-in angle parking for more than 30 years. (See attached letter from Bill Jack.) Attachment 3 3.Washington, D.C. Contact person: Rashid Sleemi 202.671.1573 Washington, D.C. has six blocks of back-in angle parking going back 15 to 20 years. The busiest thoroughfare is the 2400 block of 18th Street NW, which has an ADT of 9,200. The street has two lanes of traffic going in each direction with no maneuver lane in front of the parking spaces. Other areas with back-in angle parking are several blocks on Water Street, NW, a low volume traffic area, and Vermont Avenue, NW, between 14th and Q streets, with an ADT of 5,000. Although no traffic records are available, Mr. Sleemi reports the perception is that back-in angle parking does not create any traffic hazards. Attachment 3 4. Indianapolis, Indiana Contact person: John Burkhardt Administrator, Traffic Division 1725 S. West Street Indianapolis, IN 46225 317. 327.2903 Indianapolis has one block of back-in angle parking, along the federal courthouse on New York Avenue, going back at least 15 years. New York Avenue is a one-way street consisting of a north parallel parking lane, three traffic lanes, a right turn lane, and angle parking. The right turn lane is directly adjacent to the angle parking. Average daily traffic is 13,800. The latest traffic records, for the years 1999-2000, reflect there were a total of two accidents over two years at the nearest intersection. They do not know if those accidents had anything to do with the angle parking. Attachment 3 APPENDIX C CITY OF VANCOUVER (2004) ANGLE BACK IN PARKING STRIPING. Attachment 3 Attachment 3 APPENDIX D CITY OF SEATTLE (2005) ANGLE BACK IN PARKING DIMENSIONS (SOURCE: FRANK NELSON, SEATTLE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT). Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Attachment 4 Copyright© 2012 Blue Zones, LLC. and Healthways, Inc. All rights reserved. HEAD-‐OUT ANGLED PARKING “Head-‐out” (or “back-‐in”) angled parking is a parking strategy whereby drivers reverse into an angled spot. It is the safest way to park a vehicle and accommodates more parked cars than parallel parking.i SAFETY Head-‐out angled parking (HOAP) improves the safety of all roadway users including motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists through: ¥ Fewer collisions: o Motorists have better visibility when pulling forward out of the parking space compared to traditional parking where drivers back out blindly o On steep streets, back-‐in angled parking automatically curbs a vehicle’s wheels, reducing the threat of runaway vehicles. ¥ Safer for children: Car doors open such that children are directed to the back of the vehicle, toward the sidewalk instead of the street. ¥ Safer for bicyclists: Motorists can see oncoming traffic when leaving the parking space, increasing their ability to see bicyclists.ii ¥ Safer loading & unloading: Trunks and car doors open toward the sidewalk and offer protection from the street, allowing loading and unloading away from moving vehicles.iii CASE STUDIES Pottstown, PA Installing HOAP resulted in: o 25% reduction in the number of accidents o 43% reduction in accidents involving parking-‐related injuriesiv Tucson, AZ Prior to installing HOAP, Tucson reported 3-‐4 parking-‐related cyclist/motor vehicle collisions per month. There were none reported in the five years following implementation.v Attachment 5 Copyright© 2012 Blue Zones, LLC. and Healthways, Inc. All rights reserved. A disabled parking stall located right next to the pedestrian crossing and curb ramp. [Nelson\Nygaard 2005.] OTHER BENEFITS ¥ Traffic calming: HOAP encourages modest, safe vehicle speeds, creating a safer environment for pedestrians, cyclists, and other roadway users.vi ¥ Enhanced walkability and bikeability: HOAP requires less maneuvering space than traditional parking, creating room for additional parking spaces, sidewalks, bike lanes, or other features, creating a more attractive and intimate space.vii ¥ Better than parallel parking: o Easier maneuverability o No risk of “dooring” where motorists opening a car door into the path of a bicyclist o Less space required. § HOAP requires 10 to 12 feet of lateral curb per vehicle vs. 22 feet per vehicle for parallel parking.viii § Increases the number of parking spaces that will fit on a street by 30% to 110%.ix ¥ Better accommodates disabled parking: In Pottstown, PA, installation of HOAP allowed room for a 13-‐foot wide disabled parking stall next to the curb ramp and pedestrian crossing. Wheelchair-‐using drivers were also able to unload away from roadway traffic, resolving many safety concerns for disabled persons using parallel parking or conventional front-‐in angled parking.x CITIES USING BACK-‐IN ANGLE PARKING (HOAP) Many cities—including large and busy metropolises—employ HOAP, including:xi ¥ Seattle, WA (city-‐wide) ¥ San Francisco, CA ¥ New York, NY ¥ Montreal, Canada ¥ Washington, DC ¥ Indianapolis, IN ¥ Austin, TX ¥ Wilmington, DE ¥ Salt Lake City, UT i Healthways/Blue Zones Vitality City: Beach Cities Livability Plan (2011). [Hereafter: Livability Plan] ii Ryan Snyder Associates and Transportation Planning for Livable Communities, “Model Design Manual for Living Streets” (2011). [Hereafter: Living Streets Manual] iii City of Indianapolis, Division of Planning, “Back-‐in Angle Parking” [Hereafter: Indianapolis DOP] iv George L. Peters, Jr., “The Art of Reverse Angle Parking.” [Hereafter: Peters] v Indianapolis DOP. vi Ibid. vii Ibid. viii WalkingInfo.org, “Back-‐in angle parking: what is it, and when and where is it most effective?” [Hereafter: WalkingInfo FAQ.] ix Healthways/Blue Zones Vitality City: Beach Cities Livability Plan (2011). [Hereafter: Livability Plan] x Ibid. xi Indianapolis DOP. Attachment 5 1 1 David Lantzer From:David Lantzer Sent:Tuesday, July 08, 2014 9:32 AM To:Michael DiVirgilio; Peter Tucker; Nanette Barragan; Carolyn Petty; Hany Fangary Cc:Tom Bakaly; Diane Strickfaden; 'Fsenteno@hermosabch.org'; CHIEF Sharon Papa; 'vcopeland@hermosabch.org'; 'krobertson@hermosabch.org' Subject:Shark Incident Importance:High Council, I have been in contact with County Lifeguards and MBFD in the aftermath of the shark incident on Saturday. I have also watched the video that the media has shown of people on the pier yelling at the swimmers about a shark. However, this is the entire video and is very disconcerting. To view it yourself, please go to http://youtu.be/ESzXLQhMMlo. There is also an article with comments about the incident at http://www.thesurfchannel.com/news/20140707/alex‐grays‐ opinion‐on‐the‐manhattan‐beach‐shark‐attack/. I have come to the following conclusions: It is not necessary, nor do I recommend, a blanket ban on fishing from the pier. If I had any evidence that fishing in and of itself was the cause of the shark incident, then I would immediately recommend such a ban. However, we must reinforce that chumming is absolutely not permitted. Temporary fishing bans on days of events that occur in the waters near the pier is prudent. The full video shows that those fishing off Manhattan’s pier were fully aware they had a shark on the line (which is already illegal); you can hear them laughing as the flailing shark “jumped right on top of him (the swimmer)”. Words are important. The Lifeguards termed this a “contact” and that seems to be the most appropriate description, not “attack”. As the comments in the video reveal, the flailing shark and the swimmer collided. The wounds Mr. Robles suffered are consistent with that description. If other information/evidence comes to light that indicates these initial conclusions are not appropriate, adjustments to them and to what I recommend will be made (the investigation is ongoing). I am continuing to liaison with the Lifeguards and MBFD. Please see the e‐mail below that I received from County Lifeguards Chief Yamamoto. In summary, a blanket fishing ban does not to address the cause of this incident. It does not hold accountable those who are responsible (though, my hope is that the investigation’s conclusion will start that process). We will reinforce what is illegal (fishing for sharks, chumming). If you have any further questions or would like to discuss this incident further, feel free to contact me at 310‐345‐0497 (cell) or via e‐mail. Sincerely, David Lantzer Fire Chief City of Hermosa Beach 540 Pier Ave 310‐376‐2479 2 From: "Yamamoto, Terry" <Terry.Yamamoto@fire.lacounty.gov> Date: July 7, 2014 at 5:06:49 PM PDT To: David Lantzer <Dlantzer@hermosabch.org> Subject: RE: Sharks Hi David First let me start off by say there are sharks in all oceans; can Hermosa have a shark attack. The answer is yes BUT with that said the odds are very low. As for a provoked shark attack such as the fisherman fishing for shark, the answer again is yes. Fortunately, Hermosa has not gotten the sharks as close to shore as Manhattan Beach. At this time I am working with the Manhattan Beach on the possibility of fishing restrictions on the pier. If they have a code stating there is no overhand casting they can create more codes. I will be making some suggestions for codes that may help. 1. One is to have a "baited hook code" this will help alleviate casting issues. 2. Two is to have "No Chumming off the pier code" stopping chumming. MB has a bit more issues because they do not lock the pier at night like Hermosa but they should. By locking the gates at night it also disallows chumming to take place overnight which is a good thing. Of course it has help with the night time pier jumpers as well. The issue that MB faces to get any codes past is in the state/ city contract. As a fishing pier all codes and restrictions must go through the State agencies which may take some effort. MB will be temporarily closing the pier to fishing down for possibly 60 days Based on the Shark incident and safety but it is not for sure, I will find out later. HB is ahead of the game due to the night closure of the pier. Hopefully MB can follow suit with the safety issue. Let me know if you want me to include you in the updates. Terry 2 From: Pete B. [mailto:broussinos@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 9:30 AM To: Michael DiVirgilio - External; Hany Fangary; Nanette Barragan; Carolyn Petty; Hany Fangary; Peter Tucker Subject: Fishing ban on the Hermosa Pier Dear City Council, The city of Manhattan Beach has correctly decided to extend the ban on fishing on their pier through at least September as a result of the recent shark attack on a swimmer near the pier (see link below). We respectfully request that you consider doing this for the Hermosa Beach pier as well. Our concern is related primarily to safety. There are lots of kids in the water this summer, especially with the LA County Junior Lifeguard Program in full swing. We're very concerned that the people who will now not be able to fish on the Manhattan pier will all come to Hermosa's pier and start doing many if the same things that may have resulted in this shark hitting the swimmer near Manhattan's Pier. It has been noted these fishermen may have been "chumming" or otherwise taking measures to attract sharks. This is obviously a real concern for us as many kids are swimming nearby. I have no problems with fishing - I'm an avid fisherman myself. However I do have some concerns about the practices of some of the folks fishing on the piers. This includes the aforementioned concern related to the recent shark incident as well as a practice known as "snagging," whereby multiple large treble hooks are cast off the pier in an effort to snag and kill gamefish in shallow water near the pier. I've asked the Dept. Of Fish & Wildlife about this, and they've informed me that, while currently it's not technically illegal, it's considered very unsporting. Unfortunately it results in real damage to our local fishery. Out of an abundance of caution we urge you to immediately consider a ban on fishing on the Hermosa pier, at least through the end of the summer. We appreciate your consideration. Respectfully, Pete & Tracy Broussinos Hermosa Beach http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-manhattan-beach-shark-attack-pier-fishing- ban-20140707-story.html 1 David Lantzer From:Terri Dinubilo on behalf of City Clerk Sent:Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:24 PM To:David Lantzer Subject:FW: Fishing and/or Chumming on Hermosa Beach Pier Per our conversation ‐ for your records. ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Marylou von Heyman [mailto:mvheyman@icloud.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:37 PM To: City Clerk Subject: Fishing and/or Chumming on Hermosa Beach Pier Hi! My name is Marylou von Heyman and I am a resident of Hermosa Beach, CA. Kevan Puckett, another Hermosa Beach resident, and I take regular walks along the strand and the Hermosa Beach pier. Normally in summer, we see quite a few fisher people fishing on the pier, many of whom are fishing with more than one fishing rod. As summer progresses, we have noticed that the fisher people leave more and more fish remains on the hand‐railings, which smells and looks disgusting. Last Sunday, July 13, 2014, we were appalled. One half of the pier resembled a slaughterhouse. There were fish remains and pools of blood all over the ground. It was a humid day and there was a heavy stench of fish guts in the air. Tourists on the pier appeared to be sickened by the sight and smell. Was this situation created as a result of the fishing ban on the Manhattan Beach pier? Have the fisher people and/or chummers moved their operations to the Hermosa Beach pier? This is outrageous! I would like to make a call‐to‐action and request the Hermosa Beach City officials to regulate the fisher people on the pier. If nothing is done, there could be a repeat of the shark attack incident that occurred in Manhattan Beach, in addition to the immense loss of tourism dollars that is already occurring. Sincerely, Marylou von Heyman Sent from my iPad 3 7/16/20141Sharing the waves with thesharks of the South BayChris LoweLong Beach State UniversityChris.lowe@csulb.edu 7/16/20142The CSULB Shark Lab, founded in 1969, is dedicated to the study of the physiological and behavioral ecology of sharks, rays, and other economically important gamefishes. Our mission is to advance our understanding of the ecology of marine fishes, training future marine scientists at the undergraduate and graduate levels, and disseminate information to resource managers and the general public to improve conservation of sharks, rays and economically important marine fishes. 7/16/20143Yikes – what have we done! 7/16/20144Growing problems…Decades1840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020Human population (millions)010203040California 7/16/20145The hazy days of California…Air pollution of Los Angeles - 1940s-1970s 7/16/20146Cleaning up the air•CA reached it’s worst state of air pollution in late 1940s•Concerned citizens pushed for more science and stronger regulations•Led to landmark clean air legislation – Clean Air Act (1970)•Air quality is much better now! 7/16/20147Just dump it… 7/16/20148Cleaning up the water•CA was discharging 1º sewage offshore (screen out the big chucks) up until the 1970s•Resulted in >100 tons of contaminants dumped in the ocean (many don’t breakdown)•Lot changed after 1972 –Clean Water Act•Now all of SoCal has full 2º treatment•Urban runoff and trash still a problem 7/16/20149A community of seafood lovers 7/16/201410Taking too much…• Over 100 years worth of declining marine stocks through early 1990s• Hunted many marine mammals to near extinction• Dirty fisheries (bycatch impacts)• Loss of marine predators• Some landmark legislation– Marine Mammal Protection Act (1973)– State ban on nearshore gillnets (1994)– Magnuson-Steven Act (1996)– CA Marine Life Protection Act (1999) 7/16/201411Effects on ocean communities?•All these impacts have taken their toll•Predators are usually first impacted•Cascading effects•Food web out of whack 7/16/201412Direct and indirect effects of overharvesting 7/16/201413 7/16/201414White sharks• Vulnerable to overfishing – Life history traits– High value of jaws, meat and fins• Caught as bycatch– Relatively low abundance– High market value• Protection – 1994 CA– 1997 U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico – 2004 CITES Appendix II– 2005 HMS Fishery Mgmt. Plan – All U.S. EEZ 7/16/201415Farallon IslandsAño Nuevo IslandGuadalupe IslandKnown adult seasonal aggregation sitesLos Angeles 7/16/201416Adult habitat and migrations 7/16/201417White shark nurseryLos Angeles 7/16/201418NOAA-DFG Gillnet logbooksDFG shark tagging programDFG game warden reportsNOAA Observer programPacFINMBA Juv. white shark tagging Prog.Scientific collectionsNewspaper and scientific articlesWhite shark catch data sources 1936-2009; n=369NOAA –DFG Gillnet logbooksMBAPacFINSci. coll.Lowe et al. 2012 7/16/201419YOYs Juveniles Adults UnkNo. of sharks reported020406080100120140160Fishery reports1936-2009; n=369< 5.7 ft5.8-11.4 ft> 11.5 ft 7/16/201420entangle netset lineharpoontrawlpurse seinelobster traphook-and-linegaffno dataNo. of sharks reported0255075100125150175300YOYJuvenileSubadult - adultUnk Captures by fishery type and ageCommercialRecreational1936-2009 7/16/201421Subadults - Adults (> 11.5 ft)Blocks fished1936-2009 7/16/201422Juveniles (5.8-11.4 ft)Blocks fished1936-2009 7/16/201423YOY (< 5.7 ft) Blocks fished1936-2009 7/16/201424Entangling Net Captures & Effort 1981-20121980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010Number of white sharks02468101214161820Number of sets02000400060008000100001200014000160001800020000Offshore drift gillnets - swordfish, sharkInshore set & drift - halibut, angel shark, wt. seabasssign of populationincrease 7/16/201425Signs of stock recoverymeso-predators•White seabassabundance is rising since 1994 (Allen et al. 2007)•Increase attributed to nearshore gillnet ban•~40 boats fishing outside 3 nmilesMetric tonYearNearshore gillnet ban 7/16/201426Recovery of bycatch speciesmeso-predators• Other spp. caught in nearshore gillnets have shown similar increases (Pondella & Allen 2009)– Giant black seabass– Leopard shark– Soupfin shark (tope) 7/16/201427CA sea lion (Calif. & Baja)1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000050,000100,000150,000200,000250,000Numbers300,000350,0002010Extensive huntingMarine Mammal Protection ActMajor gillnet regulationsStrongEl NinoPopulation growth6.5% per year!NOAA concludespopulation carrying capacity 7/16/201428What’s the deal with these babies?• Where are they born?• Where do they go?• What do they eat?• How long do they stay?• Who’s babies are they? 7/16/201429Working with local commercial fishers 7/16/201430 7/16/201431 7/16/201432 7/16/201433 7/16/201434 7/16/201435Where do they live?SPOT tagPAT tagAcoustic tagSince 2006:19 SPOTs27 PATs11 acoustic tags (8 year life)10 archival tags 7/16/201436White Shark Captures (MBA program)You are here 7/16/201437JWS SPOT Detections (2006-2009)44% of detections inside state waters 7/16/201438Fisheries interactions•Avg. 44±24% baby white sharks found dead in nets annually (2006-2012)• 94% survival for live caught and released sharks!• Shorter net soak times can further reduce mortalities 7/16/201439Beach BabiesPhoto: Randy Wright 7/16/201440Will Rogers State Beach 7/16/201441 7/16/201442MalibuSanta MonicaMarina Del ReyManhattan BeachHermosa BeachRedondo BeachVenice BeachAcoustic receivers 7/16/201443Will Rogers Beach #1Will Rogers Beach #2Santa Monica PierManhattan Beach Pier 7/16/201444Seasonal migrations 7/16/201445Why are these babies here?• What makes these locations special?• Developing “shark surveillance robots”• Tracking and mapping 7/16/201446Drone surveys • Cost effective• Non-intrusive• Full automated 7/16/201447Return of the predators•It’s taken decades•Better water quality, fisheries management has allowed for ecosystem recovery•Predators return!•“unintentional ecosystem management” 7/16/201448California’s greatest conservation success story 7/16/201449Has all this “acting” got us anywhere? 7/16/201450Sharing the waves 7/16/201451Should you be worried about these sharks? 4 1444 9th Street ph 310 451 1550 info@healthebay.org Santa Monica CA 90401 fax 310 496 1902 www.healthebay.org July 15, 2014 City of Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Via email: cityclerk@hermosabch.org; krobertson@hermosabch.org RE: Recommended education program to reduce conflict between pier fishing & shark interactions Dear Mayor DiVirgilio and Honorable Councilmembers, On behalf of Heal the Bay, a local non-profit environmental organization with over 15,000 members dedicated to making Santa Monica Bay and Southern California coastal waters and watersheds safe, healthy, and clean, we’re writing the City of Hermosa Beach in response to the unfortunate shark bite situation over the 4th of July weekend. We are concerned about recent proposals to prohibit fishing from piers in response to this situation. Instead, Heal the Bay believes an education program is urgently needed to prevent white shark fishing from piers and other negative human-ocean wildlife interactions in the Santa Monica Bay. Specifically, we recommend that municipalities pursue a shark ambassador educational program for pier anglers in the Santa Monica Bay. Santa Monica Bay is home to dozens of shark and ray species. Many of them are small, like the swell shark and horn shark, and live in kelp forests and rocky reefs. Juvenile great white sharks are seasonal residents of Southern California's coastal waters, likely congregating in Santa Monica Bay in summer months due to a mixture of abundant prey and warm water. Sharks play an important ecosystem role by keeping populations of other fish healthy and ecosystems in balance. In addition, a number of scientific studies demonstrate that the depletion of sharks can result in the loss of commercially important fish and shellfish. Despite popular perceptions of sharks as invincible, shark populations around the world are declining due to overfishing, habitat destruction and other human activities. White shark numbers in the Northeastern Pacific are unknown but are thought to be low, ranging from hundreds to thousands of individuals. White shark fishing is illegal in California, and they were recently considered for potential special status listing under the California Endangered Species Act. White sharks are vulnerable to ongoing threats, such as incidental catch, pollution and other issues along our coast. It has come to Heal the Bay’s attention that many cities with piers along the Santa Monica Bay (e.g. Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach, Venice, Santa Monica) are considering the possibility of issuing temporary closures to fishing on their piers. Manhattan Beach elected to prohibit fishing from its pier for the next 60 days. Although we understand why Manhattan Beach issued a temporary pier fishing moratorium, we oppose such action. Piers are one of the only places where people can fish without a fishing license in California, which results in high numbers of subsistence anglers from many areas throughout Los Angeles that come to piers to fish for food due to the low cost and easy access. We are concerned about the environmental justice issues presented by prohibiting fishing on Santa Monica Bay piers. The shark bite was a very unusual situation, and we believe closing piers to fishing goes beyond what should be done to reduce the risk of angler, shark, and beachgoer interactions. 1444 9th Street ph 310 451 1550 info@healthebay.org Santa Monica CA 90401 fax 310 496 1902 www.healthebay.org As an alternative, Heal the Bay recommends the establishment of a pier and sport angler shark ambassador educational program. Such program would involve on-the-pier ambassadors that educate anglers about about which fish are allowed to target, and which ones cannot be caught (e.g. white sharks); how to avoid catching these sharks and target the other species; and to safely remove sharks and other marine life from the line. Such a program could also educate anglers and other pier visitors about the diversity of sharks in the Santa Monica Bay, and their ecology. Heal the Bay already has a platform for a shark ambassador educational program through our pier angler outreach program, which reaches an average of 10,000 pier anglers each year. Our pier angler outreach program began in 2002 in partnership with the Fish Consumption Education Collaborative, and reaches anglers on 10 piers throughout Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Currently we work in four languages: English, Spanish, Russian, and Chinese. In previous years, we have also conducted outreach in Tagalog, Vietnamese, and Cambodian. The program currently focuses on educating anglers about how to avoid contaminated fish, but could be extended to educate about better interactions with sensitive species, like white sharks, if resources were available to support such an effort. In addition to providing an education benefit, an ambassador program could also help reduce the occurrence of intentional pursuit of white sharks on piers, since there would be a dedicated presence on the piers. We understand the importance of responsible ocean recreation that benefits both people and wildlife and support the City’s commitment to finding a good solution to meet both of these goals in relation to fishing on the pier. Please contact us if you have any questions, or would like to further discuss this recommendation. Sincerely, Sarah Abramson Sikich, MESM Ruskin Hartley Science & Policy Director, Coastal Resources President & Chief Executive Officer 5 CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS Section 25. The people shall have the right to fish upon and from the public lands of the State and in the waters thereof, excepting upon lands set aside for fish hatcheries, and no land owned by the State shall ever be sold or transferred without reserving in the people the absolute right to fish thereupon; and no law shall ever be passed making it a crime for the people to enter upon the public lands within this State for the purpose of fishing in any water containing fish that have been planted therein by the State; provided, that the legislature may by statute, provide for the season when and the conditions under which the different species of fish may be taken. 6 7 32 ARTICLE 2 PUBLIC ACCESS Section 30210 Access; recreational opportunities; posting In carrying out the requirement of Section 4 of Article X of the California Constitution, maximum access, which shall be conspicuously posted, and recreational opportunities shall be provided for all the people consistent with public safety needs and the need to protect public rights, rights of private property owners, and natural resource areas from overuse. (Amended by Ch. 1075, Stats. 1978.) Section 30211 Development not to interfere with access Development shall not interfere with the public's right of access to the sea where acquired through use or legislative authorization, including, but not limited to, the use of dry sand and rocky coastal beaches to the first line of terrestrial vegetation. Section 30212 New development projects (a) Public access from the nearest public roadway to the shoreline and along the coast shall be provided in new development projects except where: (1) it is inconsistent with public safety, military security needs, or the protection of fragile coastal resources, (2) adequate access exists nearby, or, (3) agriculture would be adversely affected. Dedicated accessway shall not be required to be opened to public use until a public agency or private association agrees to accept responsibility for maintenance and liability of the accessway. (b) For purposes of this section, "new development" does not include: (1) Replacement of any structure pursuant to the provisions of subdivision (g) of Section 30610. (2) The demolition and reconstruction of a single-family residence; provided, that the reconstructed residence shall not exceed either the floor area, height or bulk of the former structure by more than 10 percent, and that the reconstructed residence shall be sited in the same location on the affected property as the former structure. (3) Improvements to any structure which do not change the intensity of its use, which do not increase either the floor area, height, or bulk of the structure by more than 10 percent, which do not block or impede public access, and which do not result in a seaward encroachment by the structure. (4) The reconstruction or repair of any seawall; provided, however, that the reconstructed or repaired seawall is not a seaward of the location of the former structure. (5) Any repair or maintenance activity for which the commission has determined, pursuant to Section 30610, that a coastal development permit will be required unless the commission determines that the activity will have an adverse impact on lateral public access along the beach. As used in this subdivision "bulk" means total interior cubic volume as measured from the exterior surface of the structure. (c) Nothing in this division shall restrict public access nor shall it excuse the performance of duties and responsibilities of public agencies which are required by Sections 66478.1 to 66478.14, inclusive, of the Government Code and by Section 4 of Article X of the California Constitution. (Amended by: Ch. 1075, Stats. 1978; Ch. 919, Stats. 1979; Ch. 744, Stats. 1983.) 33 Section 30212.5 Public facilities; distribution Wherever appropriate and feasible, public facilities, including parking areas or facilities, shall be distributed throughout an area so as to mitigate against the impacts, social and otherwise, of overcrowding or overuse by the public of any single area. Section 30213 Lower cost visitor and recreational facilities; encouragement and provision; overnight room rentals Lower cost visitor and recreational facilities shall be protected, encouraged, and, where feasible, provided. Developments providing public recreational opportunities are preferred. The commission shall not: (1) require that overnight room rentals be fixed at an amount certain for any privately owned and operated hotel, motel, or other similar visitor-serving facility located on either public or private lands; or (2) establish or approve any method for the identification of low or moderate income persons for the purpose of determining eligibility for overnight room rentals in any such facilities. (Amended by: Ch. 1191, Stats. 1979; Ch. 1087, Stats. 1980; Ch. 1007, Stats. 1981; Ch. 285, Stats. 1991.) Section 30214 Implementation of public access policies; legislative intent (a) The public access policies of this article shall be implemented in a manner that takes into account the need to regulate the time, place, and manner of public access depending on the facts and circumstances in each case including, but not limited to, the following: (1) Topographic and geologic site characteristics. (2) The capacity of the site to sustain use and at what level of intensity. (3) The appropriateness of limiting public access to the right to pass and repass depending on such factors as the fragility of the natural resources in the area and the proximity of the access area to adjacent residential uses. (4) The need to provide for the management of access areas so as to protect the privacy of adjacent property owners and to protect the aesthetic values of the area by providing for the collection of litter. (b) It is the intent of the Legislature that the public access policies of this article be carried out in a reasonable manner that considers the equities and that balances the rights of the individual property owner with the public's constitutional right of access pursuant to Section 4 of Article X of the California Constitution. Nothing in this section or any amendment thereto shall be construed as a limitation on the rights guaranteed to the public under Section 4 of Article X of the California Constitution. (c) In carrying out the public access policies of this article, the commission and any other responsible public agency shall consider and encourage the utilization of innovative access management techniques, including, but not limited to, agreements with private organizations which would minimize management costs and encourage the use of volunteer programs. (Amended by: Ch. 919, Stats. 1979; Ch. 285, Stats. 1991.) 34 ARTICLE 3 RECREATION Section 30220 Protection of certain water-oriented activities Coastal areas suited for water-oriented recreational activities that cannot readily be provided at inland water areas shall be protected for such uses. Section 30221 Oceanfront land; protection for recreational use and development Oceanfront land suitable for recreational use shall be protected for recreational use and development unless present and foreseeable future demand for public or commercial recreational activities that could be accommodated on the property is already adequately provided for in the area. (Amended by Ch. 380, Stats. 1978.) Section 30222 Private lands; priority of development purposes The use of private lands suitable for visitor-serving commercial recreational facilities designed to enhance public opportunities for coastal recreation shall have priority over private residential, general industrial, or general commercial development, but not over agriculture or coastal-dependent industry. Section 30222.5 Oceanfront lands; aquaculture facilities; priority Oceanfront land that is suitable for coastal dependent aquaculture shall be protected for that use, and proposals for aquaculture facilities located on those sites shall be given priority, except over other coastal dependent developments or uses. (Added by Ch. 1486, Stats. 1982.) Section 30223 Upland areas Upland areas necessary to support coastal recreational uses shall be reserved for such uses, where feasible. Section 30224 Recreational boating use; encouragement; facilities Increased recreational boating use of coastal waters shall be encouraged, in accordance with this division, by developing dry storage areas, increasing public launching facilities, providing additional berthing space in existing harbors, limiting non-water-dependent land uses that congest access corridors and preclude boating support facilities, providing harbors of refuge, and by providing for new boating facilities in natural harbors, new protected water areas, and in areas dredged from dry land. 8 CHAPTER 12.24 MUNICIPAL PIER Sections: 12.24.010 Changing clothing in washrooms or toilets on municipal pier. 12.24.020 Permit to sell goods. 12.24.030 Throwing bait or litter on pier. 12.24.040 Casting of lines from pier. 12.24.050 Writing on or cutting on pier. 12.24.060 Diving off pier--Exception as to lifeguards. 12.24.070 Skates, skateboards, bicycles and scooters prohibited on pier. 12.24.080 Dogs, cats or other animals, on or off leash, prohibited on pier. 12.24.090 Consumption of alcoholic beverages prohibited on pier. 12.24.100 Swimming and surfing near pier prohibited. 12.24.110 Trespassing on restricted portion of pier. 12.24.120 Regulations for fish stalls on pier. 12.24.010 Changing clothing in washrooms or toilets on municipal pier. It is unlawful for any person either to dress or undress in the washroom or toilets on the municipal pier or to change from clothing into bathing suits in such washrooms or toilets thereon, and a violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-36) 12.24.020 Permit to sell goods. It is unlawful for any person to solicit any custom or trade, or peddle or sell tickets, goods, wares or merchandise upon any part of the municipal pier without first obtaining a permit and license from the city council to do so, which permit or license shall designate the kind of goods, wares or merchandise permitted to be sold thereunder, and exclude the right or privilege to sell on the pier any goods, wares or merchandise not named in the license or permit. A violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-37) 12.24.030 Throwing bait or litter on pier. It is unlawful for any person to leave any fish, clam sells or other fish bait, or the remnants from cleaning any fish or any other debris upon the municipal pier, and every person bringing the same, or any luncheon, papers or fish bait upon the pier, shall keep the same in a receptacle or package and when leaving the pier shall remove the same from the pier and leave thereon no litter or debris of any kind. A violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-38) 12.24.040 Casting of lines from pier. Page 1 of 3City of Hermosa Beach : Chapter 12.24 Municipal Pier 7/16/2014http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=445 It is unlawful for any person on the municipal pier to cast a line with any weight, and/or hook, and/or bait attached thereto by swinging same above the railing on the pier or by swinging or casting the line overhead or sidearmed from a pole or from the hands; and it is unlawful for any person fishing from the pier to fish by means of more than two fishing lines in use by him on the pier at the same time. A violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-39) 12.24.050 Writing on or cutting on pier. It is unlawful for any person to write, cut, mark, stain or otherwise deface any portion of the municipal pier, or any building or attachment thereon. A violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-40) 12.24.060 Diving off pier--Exception as to lifeguards. It is unlawful for any person or persons to either dive or jump from the pier or to push, shove or cause any person to fall, dive or jump from the pier; or to climb or be on the outside of the railing of the pier except members of the lifeguard service of a governmental agency or such other person as may be delegated by the lifeguard service, or any of its personnel, to assist them in rescuing or saving lives, or in the regular drills and training therefor under the supervision of the lifeguard service; and except for authorized persons in the maintenance and repair or construction of the pier or parts thereof; and except for such aquatic events or activities as are approved and authorized by the city. A violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-41) 12.24.070 Skates , skateboards, bicycles and scooters prohibited on pier. It is unlawful for any person to ride or drive any automobile, horse or other vehicle or animal on the pier unless authorized to do so by the city manager or his authorized representative and a permit obtained therefor; or to ride and/or park any skates, skateboard, bicycle, scooter or similar conveyance on the pier. A violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-42) 12.24.080 Dogs , cats or other animals, on or off leash, prohibited on pier. It is unlawful for the owner, or any other person having custody of, any dog, cat or other animal to permit the same to be on the pier, whether said animal is on leash or not, or whether in the custody of any person or not, and a violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-43) 12.24.090 Consumption of alcoholic beverages prohibited on pier. It is unlawful for any person to consume any alcoholic beverage, liquor or intoxicating liquor while on any part of the municipal pier, and a violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-44) 12.24.100 Swimming and surfing near pier prohibited. It is unlawful to swim, operate or otherwise use a surfboard, skin dive, or use self-contained Page 2 of 3City of Hermosa Beach : Chapter 12.24 Municipal Pier 7/16/2014http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=445 underwater breathing apparatus within an area described as one hundred (100) feet of either side of the pier, except for purposes otherwise authorized by this chapter. A violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-45) 12.24.110 Trespassing on restricted portion of pier. It is unlawful for any person to trespass or enter upon that portion of the municipal pier restricted against public use by any order of the city council, or to attempt to climb over any fence or barricade separating such restricted portion of the pier from the part thereof to which the public is admitted. A violation of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-46) 12.24.120 Regulations for fish stalls on pier. It is unlawful on the municipal pier for any person: A. To maintain or operate more than one fish stall for fresh fish or one fish stall for smoked and cured fish; B. To place or cast dead fish or parts thereof, garbage or any other refuse in the Pacific Ocean, or on its beach, unless it be placed or cast therein or thereon under supervision of the police department of the city; C. To keep or place any refuse, fish heads or garbage on such pier, excepting in clean and sanitary garbage cans provided with suitable covers; D. To use bait set lines or fish hooks which are to be used for commercial purposes; E. Use loud or boisterous language thereon for the solicitation of business or any other reason; F. Keep or store any boat thereon for a period of more than four hours in any one day or use the pier for the repair of boats excepting minor repairs; G. Sell other than fish for smoking purposes; H. To maintain their business, stall or other appliances appurtenant thereto, in an unclean or unsanitary condition; I. To keep tender boats on the pier, providing however, that one tender boat and no more may be kept thereon; J. Maintain or operate a fish stall until the plans and equipment thereof shall have been approved by the local health officer; K. A violation of any provision of this section shall be an infraction. (Prior code § 5-47) Page 3 of 3City of Hermosa Beach : Chapter 12.24 Municipal Pier 7/16/2014http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=445 From: Chris Karkenny [mailto:ckarkenny@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 7:44 PM To: Tom Bakaly; Elaine Doerfling Subject: Hermosa Beach Pier Fishing Tom, I wanted to drop you and the City Council a note regarding Pier Fishing and the unfortunate recent event in Manhattan Beach. We all want to keep our beaches safe for swimmers, surfers, paddleboarders, and for the many families who enjoy our beautiful beaches in one way or another. This would also include fishermen but I think there is some serious concern with regard to what fishing means off of our Pier. I do not think the intent is to have folks fishing with steel leaders, large hooks, numbers approaching 100, and to be able to chum the waters off the Pier. Somehow things have gotten out of hand and resulted in the recent shark bite- I'm not sure how this was not seen given the fact that a couple white sharks have been hooked on lines off the Manhattan Beach Pier with police and guards being brought in to make sure the lines were cut. Hermosa Beach should really evaluate what fishing on the Pier means as my recent walk on the Pier this past Saturday and Sunday amazed me- I counted 88 fishing lines on Saturday and 92 on Sunday (which seems entirely too many given the size of our Pier)- it was also difficult to walk thru as the folks casted out, overhead no less which I understand is not permitted. And the smell and blood from the fish on the Pier was not a great showing of what we are about. I am for banning fishing off the Pier if for nothing else to give us time to evaluate and make sure we keep the families and children in our waters safe from a potential shark bite (given there is now no fishing off the Manhattan Beach Pier its not a far stretch to have the sharks come down the mile and half to the Hermosa Beach Pier area which has become super crowded). Also, something should be done to clean up and keep the Pier safe for folks that just want to enjoy a stroll down the Pier- with the fishermen it is not an enjoyable experience and other folks have relayed their recent experiences to me of dodging hooks with their families. Just wanted to let you know some thoughts from someone who swims, surfs and paddleboards in our waters regularly. I think we all want to make sure we do not have something happen in Hermosa Beach that we would look back upon as being preventable with some decisive actions and changes with regard to Pier fishing. I would be happy to discuss in more detail. With best regards, Chris Karkenny Hermosa Beach Resident Also I have copied Elaine Doerfling, if she can pass this on to the entire City Council and post the email as written communication on the City Council Agenda. From: Dennis Duke Noor [mailto:denduke@verizon.net] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 12:58 PM To: Elaine Doerfling Subject: Bans, white sharks and the media frenzy! DUKE NOOR 250-35th Street Hermosa Beach, Ca 90254 310-318-5425 July 18, 2014 Dear Honorary Mayor and Council members, Being a life-long resident of both Hermosa Beach (64 years) I am opposed to any long term ( permanent) Ban on fishing off the Hermosa Beach Pier. I feel for the shark bite victim, Steve Robles in this case, But he was caught In a very rare case of circumstances. And, the fisherman Is another story. I think he should be prosecuted, and still might be! I could go on and on as I have pages of data and facts, but that would be Redundant from previous articles, posts and comments, etc. I would challenge any "Fishing Banners" with 2 questions: 1. What happens when schools of anchovies (or seals, bat rays, squids, etc.) Swim near The Pier to attract sharks? 2. What about surf fishing? Lifeguards have the authority to stop it if The ocean is too crowded, but will that be banned too? I saw a friend of mine surf Fishing within 25 feet of the Manhattan Beach Pier a few days after their ban Went into effect. So, that 25 feet makes a difference? Seems A bit hypocritical to me. This Heal the Bay report may help you with your decisions at Council: "About white sharks in Manhattan Beach" http://www.healthebay.org/blogs-news/faq-about-white-sharks-manhattan-beach My suggestion, and that of most at last weeks MB meeting, is to enforce the laws already In place and possibly draft some new regulations to prohibit fishing for large game off The Pier. Manhattan Beach's ban from July 7 - July 15 was/and is quite possibly illegal Because they failed to get a mandatory waiver from the Coastal Commission. This was never reported, but you can verify that with MB Community Development Director. They may have the proper Permit by now, we'll see on Monday. Please don't buy into the alarmists and the media frenzy! The chances of you being bitten by a white shark un-provoked is 12 million to 1. You have a better chance to be struck by Lightening, according to experts. Best wishes, Duke Noor Hermosa Beach From: Greg Maffei <greg@PrimeSouthBayRealEstate.com> Date: July 21, 2014 at 11:34:45 AM PDT To: tbakaly@hermosabch.org Cc: Hany and Dina Fangary <hany@velascolawgroup.com> Subject: Hermosa Beach Pier Fishing Tom: A neighbor and friend, Chris Karkenny, sent you a letter last week regarding issue of beach and pier fishing in Hermosa Beach. In light of the recent shark attack just 2 miles north of us, our concerns should be just as serious about the possible proliferation of sharks on our beaches. Whether fishing attracts sharks and/or annoys sharks and makes them even more dangerous to our residents, this is something I believe many Hermosa residents would like to see addressed by our city. I have two young children that LOVE swimming in the ocean and I am becoming more worried with the growing shark population and our active fishing community in Hermosa Beach. Thank you for doing whatever you can to make this a topic of conversation with our city council. Take care, Greg Maffei Hermosa Beach Resident -- __________ Greg Maffei Broker / Realtor RE/MAX ESTATE PROPERTIES Los Angeles South Bay and Westside Specialist 310.800.0388 (mobile direct) 310.937.3288 (office) 310.388.0381 (fax) greg@PrimeSouthBayRealEstate.com greg@PrimeSoCalRealEstate.com www.PrimeSoCalRealEstate.com www.PrimeSouthBayRealEstate.com www.NoFailShortSale.com From: J. Y. Easton [mailto:jjjeasto@hotmail.com] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 5:53 PM To: Elaine Doerfling Subject: FW: Issue of Fishing on H.B. Pier Dear Ms. Doerfling: Please present my following opinion of the above referenced issue to the mayor and city council members upon receipt, for their consideration prior to the next city council meeting: It is deeply regretful, in many ways, that a swimmer was bitten by a shark off the Manhattan Beach pier recently...and ever so fortunate that he was saved and lived to tell about it. Notwithstanding the foregoing, fishing from any and all piers should not be banned. The ocean is not just for swimmers, surfers, and boarders. They can be attacked by sharks anywhere in the ocean, not just near a pier. Fishing from piers has been legal in all of California ever since piers have been erected. In fact, as you may know, piers are the only places in California where fishing is legal without a state fishing license. Would it even be legal to ban fishing from a pier, contrary to state law? Regardless of whether a fisherman was chumming or not prior to the shark attack, all sorts of sea life are attracted to pier fishing areas by discarded parts of fish, after cleaning, tossed the ocean -- where it provides food for other sea life. It also hygienically prevents the accumulation of malodorous, decaying fish parts in trash receptacles. Ocean activity near fishing lines and the attached hooks is dangerous regardless of the proximity of sharks. Prudent swimmers, boarders, and surfers would and should keep their distance. Such uses should be limited to a safe distance from piers since common sense does not prevent all of those users from putting themselves in harm's way. In addition to limiting said uses near the pier, all ocean goers could be protected from sharks by installing nets to keep sharks out of areas within close distance of the beach. I believe this is done in Australia and Hawaii. Submitted by Jacqueline Easton, homeowner and resident of Hermosa Beach From: Marv Cross [mailto:marvcross@verizon.net] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 10:32 AM To: Elaine Doerfling; Hany Fangary Subject: Fish or get off the pier Please forward this to the entire city counsel Hi, I have been a resident of Hermosa Beach since 1987 and have never once fished off the pier. That being said I think the idea of banning fishing from the pier is bit extreme. There were people fishing in Hermosa Beach long before there were surfers and paddle boarders. It’s very unfortunate that someone chose not to follow the rules in Manhattan Beach (cutting the great white loose) which ended up in a swimmer being injured. That person should be arrested and tried just like anyone else that chooses not to follow the law. To ban people from fishing off the pier because of this incident is a knee jerk (over) reaction to an unfortunate set of circumstances. If you choose to ban fishing from the pier then you must also ban cars from Hermosa Beach because a few people choose to run stop signs, stop lights, speed, and fail to yield to pedestrians which result in injuries and death. The same holds true for banning all alcohol in the city because a few people choose to get drunk and get into fights that result in injury or death or they drive while intoxicated and cause injuries or death. What about those that fly stunt kites, play Frisbee, throw a football, or any number of other activities that take place in a public area that can result in injuries or death. Not to mention kite surfers that fly 20 plus feet in the air and can land on someone causing injury or death. Where does it end? I’m very disappointed that we’re even considering a ban on fishing from the pier. How can the voice of a few people over rule common sense? We have laws in place to deal with all of these situations. Enforce the law and don’t succumb to the ridiculous requests of a few extremist to ban something just because someone fails to adhere to the laws established to regulate activities like fishing, driving, surfing, and drinking, not to mention a thousand other activities that have an inherent risk to them. If the city feels like they must do something then ban swimming and surfing within 50 yards of the pier just like you ban surfers from swimming areas and vice versa. There’s no reason to completely ban fishing because there are people that choose to enjoy the ocean in other ways like swimming , surfing, etc. that also choose not to fish. Thank you, Marv Cross From: nisens@aol.com [mailto:nisens@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 11:55 AM To: Michael DiVirgilio; Peter Tucker; Nanette Barragan; Carolyn Petty; Hany Fangary Cc: City Clerk Subject: Proposed pier fishing ban I am not in favor of a complete ban on fishing from the Hermosa Beach pier. The pier was originally built as a fishing pier, and should continue as such, with conditions. Ban all shark fishing from the pier instead. Anyone fishing from the pier who hooks any kind of shark must cut the line immediately, or face a heavy fine. There should be clear signage to this, and the lifeguards need to have authority to oversee this and call HB Police if fisherman does not comply. Peggy Nisen 504 Third Street Manhattan Beach From: Paul Efron [mailto:efron@theriver.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 4:20 PM To: Michael DiVirgilio Cc: Hany Fangary; Carolyn Petty; Nanette Barragan; Peter Tucker; City Clerk Subject: E&B Oil Dear Mayor DiVirgilio, It was a pleasure meeting you outside of Paisano's Pizza the other day. I am concerned about the upcoming E&B Oil vote in that the voters don't know or understand the issues. A vote of NO may be the best answer, it may not. I do not want the vote to be decided by an emotional 3 word advertising campaign. These are a few of the issues that the people need to know and I have yet to see these addressed at all. 1) A vote of NO means there will be no drilling and the city will have to pay $17.5 Million. This is a lot for such a tiny community. Where will this money come from ? I don't mean which account, I mean if this money is spent on this settlement, then what will the city lose in order to cover this ? Will police or sanitation be reduced ? Will The Strand cleaning be stopped ? No more free concerts on the beach ? How will this payment effect each person. Will property taxes be raised roughly $1000 per resident to cover this. Is it simply that with a NO vote I pay $1000 ? 2) The same goes for a YES vote where the city can potentially gain $500 Million. What will this money be spent on ? Daily cleaning of The Strand ? Free drinks in the bars ? (yes joking). Reduction of property taxes ? Payments to the people ? Improvement projects ? Believe it or not, the people believe that a win fall like this will be sucked up by corruption and the public officials !! 3) The unknown is scary !!! What does an oil well sight like this look, smell and sound like ? I do not know. You can't get this from an artist's rendering or printed report. May I suggest you coordinate with E&B or other oil companies and explain it in a video. Find an impartial newscaster with no experience in the oil industry, have them and a small group of people visit a similar oil well site. Have them approach the site from a mile away downwind. Have them describe the sound and smell. Do this again as they move closer. Video what the wells look like and explain what to expect. Use the video to take the mystery out of what an oil well is. Thanx again for your hard work, Paul Efron 2 Draft Health Impact Assessment (HIA) The City Council will hold a study session on the HIA at 6:00 p.m. before tonight’s City Council meeting (July 22). The reissued HIA is available for public comment until August 14 as indicated in the press release attached. The final revised HIA is anticipated to be available by the end of August. The draft HIA is online at www.hermosabch.org, and available at the Community Development Department, and Hermosa Beach Library. A post card was mailed to property owners/occupants. As indicated in the staff report for the HIA study session, the HIA recommended several additional mitigations which could be considered for incorporation into the Development Agreement. They are repeated here for Council consideration in regards the Development Agreement. 1. To address potential discomfort and annoyance from odor releases: If frequent reports of odors occur, additional study and/or periodic monitoring of odor may be warranted. 2. To reduce impacts from light on residents: Provide individuals with bedrooms with direct line-of-sight of the exposed side of the electric drill rig that will be lit at night with black-out blinds or curtains to eliminate any potential impacts to sleep patterns. (Staff notes a program could be established to accomplish this by direct mailing throughout applicable phases and when complaints occur). 3. To reduce impacts of potential elevated noise levels from pipeline construction activities (Phase 3b): Provide local residents with written notification of impending work including the dates and times of activities that may produce excessive noise. (Staff notes that as a condition of discretionary project approval the city typically requires a requirement that occupants within 100 feet be notified 72 hours in advance of construction noise.) 4. To address property values: The HIA states that E&B could consider evaluating housing prices for those in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. (The Development Agreement negotiations include discussion of a program to compensate property owners.) 5. To address safety: The HIA recommends updating the City’s emergency preparedness plan. (While this action is incumbent upon the city to perform, there would be a cost associated with this work.) The HIA also provides the following monitoring and evaluation recommendations which can also be considered in Development Agreement negotiations. The evaluation step can demonstrate the effectiveness of the HIA in the planning process by comparing community health pre-Project with that as the Project is constructed and operates. A. Community Liaison Committee: Consideration should be given to forming a Community Liaison Committee (CLC) if the Project is approved, and prior to commencement of construction activities. The CLC would serve as the vehicle through which citizens could 3 voice active concerns about Project activities. The intention of the committee would then be to work collectively to find ways of addressing resident’s concerns. B. Follow-up Community Health Assessment: Analysis of health statistics by susceptible subpopulation status could identify whether some groups are disproportionately impacted by Project operations. An update to the baseline health study could be completed five years after the Project becomes operational, but would depend on the level of concern within the community at that time. C. Quality of Life Health Survey: A quality of life (QOL) health survey could be used as a tool to establish current baseline conditions, and to monitor whether health status changes during the Project. There are well established survey tools available (SF-36 and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]) that could be employed. The most cost-effective means of delivering these surveys would be on-line; however, data quality collection can be compromised. Mail drops could also be considered. This survey would then be followed up after operations began. The HIA notes that “an internal evaluation of the overall approach and effectiveness of the HIA will be conducted internally by Intrinsik’s HIA team” and Dr. McDaniel has confirmed this will be at no charge. The HIA also states that the “City of Hermosa Beach may also wish to evaluate the utility of the HIA to identify aspects of the HIA process that were beneficial and those that could be enhanced in the future.” Development Agreement HIA Recommendations: The Council may desire to direct the Council’s subcommittee to negotiate incorporation of recommendations in the HIA above into the Development Agreement. Unless Council determines tonight to delay the election past November 4th, the Council will hold a public hearing on July 29 regarding the ballot measure, development agreement and related matters (7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers). Additional negotiations have not occurred subsequent to the June 2nd meeting where the City Development Agreement subcommittee, consisting of Mayor DiVirgilio and Councilmember Fangary, along with staff members Tom Bakaly and Michael Jenkins, and outside counsel Michael Mills of the Stoel Rives firm met with representatives from E&B or since the Council’s June 10th update. E&B representatives made it clear that they do not believe that public benefits can be negotiated as long as the CBA and HIA are not final. They were willing to have the City present additional public benefits for their consideration and the City team did that. They were also willing to discuss the form of the Development Agreement with legal counsel. The current working version of the Development Agreement (with no change since the June 2nd meeting) is online: http://hermosabeach.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=6&clip_id=3118&meta_id=151391 This is reflected in the Development Agreement recommended by the Planning Commission on June 23rd which can be reviewed at http://hermosabeach.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=&clip_id=1376&meta_id=152607. From: Marieke [mailto:mariekekmiller@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 11:25 PM To: Oil Project Subject: Election date I understand e & b wants to have the election for the oil project moved to a later date. I respectfully reject their notion more time is needed for voters to be informed. We in Hermosa beach have been made aware of this upcoming issue for well over a year and have had many notices of city council hearings, EIR reports etc. i am of the firm opinion e&b wants the election pushed so not as many hermosans will show up to the ballot. Please keep the election scheduled for November as previously agreed and allow the residents to decide during a general election. Thank you, --Marieke Miller 501 Herondo st 24 HB ca 90254 July 22, 2014 RE: Election Timing Dear Hermosa Beach City Council, It seems E&B will most likely be suing the city of Hermosa Beach to try and get their way no matter what our city does or when our City Council decides to put the Oil Drilling Measure up for vote. E&B constantly tell everyone they saved Hermosa Beach from our longstanding legal predicament regarding Oil. Unfortunately now E&B have us in a totally new legal predicament. Really the only thing that has changed is the company with whom our city is at odds. E&B has proven they cannot be trusted to do anything they promise nor have they negotiated in good faith. And now they try to bully the city looking for more time before this vote. Their obvious purpose is an attempt to stall the overwhelming support of the citizens of Hermosa Beach wanting to maintain the Oil Drilling Ban currently in place. This should not be allowed. Finally, statistics tell us there will be a significant difference in voter turnout between the various dates being discussed. The number of residents who will ultimately participate in this election should carry some weight in your decision. Therefore I respectfully ask this City Council to place the Oil Drilling Measure on the November 2014 Ballot. Sincerely, Scott Frantz 642 7th Street Hermosa Beach From: Thomas Northup [mailto:skyking.tn@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 7:03 AM To: Terri Dinubilo Subject: Vote Delay The majority of the residents of Hermosa Beach see E & B's latest stall tactic not as a means of giving the people more time to digest information, but to help their cause by holding the election at a time more to their advantage due to lower turn-out. The project has been presented to the people many times through study sessions, open meetings, etc. We are tired of being bullied by this oil driller. The vote must be in November! Tom Northup 632 9th Hermosa Beach July 14, 2014 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 2014 AMENDMENT OF CONTRACT FOR OIL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LEGAL SERVICES WITH STOEL RIVES LLP TO INCREASE PAYMENT FROM $75,000 TO $125,000 Recommendation: City Council should authorize an additional $50,000 for Oil Development Agreement (DA) legal services with Stoel Rives LLP. Background/Analysis: On April 8, 2014, City Council authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement for legal services related to the Oil Development Agreement in an amount of up to $20,000 (attached). At a blended billing rate of $390 this amount was exhausted within roughly 2 weeks of brining the oil firm on board. On June 10, 2014, City Council authorized an additional $55,000 to assist with the City DA subcommittee and City Council with oil development agreement issues. City Council should authorize an additional $50,000 to assist with ongoing oil development agreement issues. Available funds are set aside for legal services such as this in the budget. Respectfully submitted, _____________________________ Tom Bakaly City Manager Fiscal Review: _____________________________ Viki Copeland Finance Director 1March and April totals 1 July 15, 2014 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 2014 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, JUNE 2014 STATISTICAL SECTION Finance Administration CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FISCAL YEAR TO DATE LAST FISCAL YR TO DATE AVERAGE T.O.T. OCCUPANCY RATE 84.8% May 2014 79.3% May 2013 80.5% May 2014 77.4 % May 2013 INVOICES/ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 80 209 419 795 CASH REGISTER TRANSACTIONS 6,971 7,704 80,203 58,416 CHECKS ISSUED 269 260 3,262 3,634 PURCHASE ORDERS 177 122 2,075 1873 DISCOUNTS TAKEN $29.75 $210.55 1,179.88 $978.59 LANDSCAPE/ ST. LIGHT REBATES (2012 Tax Yr.) 9 4 102 115 UUT EXEMPTIONS TO DATE (7) 1,960 (2) 1,938 PAYROLL Full Time Employees 116 114 Part Time Employees 39 38 CITATION PAYMENTS 4,782 5,400 57,014 51,737 DMV PAYMENTS 618 330 6,368 5,793 DELINQUENT NOTICES SENT: California 2,162 1,000 36,630 29,120 Out of State 289 0 2,911 0 TOTAL: 2,451 1,000 39,541 29,1206 2 NOTED: Respectfully submitted: ___________________________ ____________________________ Tom Bakaly, Viki Copeland, City Manager Finance Director *Amounts received in July/August for June renewals are added in June, so this is not the final number of licenses or revenue amount. Finance Cashier CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FISCAL YEAR TO DATE LAST FISCAL YR TO DATE DISMISSALS 253 518 3,337, 4,409 REVENUE - VEH. IMPOUNDS $3,968 $0 $40,167 $17,250 PARKING PERMITS: Driveway 14 11 80 63 Guest Party Passes 1,146 1,074 7,280 5,981 Temp. Res. Passes 0 0 0 0 Contractor 99 52 769 527 Daily 21 27 278 229 Annual Preferential Transferable 137 130 4,466 4,496 Employee Vehicle Sticker 6 9 244 244 Vehicle 182 196 5,443 5,443 Energy Efficient Vehicles- NEW 1 0 60 26 TOTAL: 326 335 10,213 10,209 MONTHLY (DAILY) PERMITS FOR PARKING LOTS 365 160 2,199 2,095 MONTHLY (24 HR) PERMITS FOR PARKING LOTS 242 216 2,312 1,752 MTA BUS PASSES 13 10 140 135 TAXI VOUCHERS SOLD 510 390 5,830 4,930 TAXI VOUCHERS USED 341 401 4,766 4,474 CASH KEYS SOLD 0 3 35 107 CASH KEY REVENUE $152.50 $991.50 $5,527.75 $17,708.25 ANIMAL LICENSES 17 16 897 915 BUSINESS LICENSES Licenses Issued 359 228 2,566 *2,501 Revenue $116,284.07 $103,046.27 $879,887.02 $844,619.72 1 July 16, 2014 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Study Session of Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 2014 Study Session – Overview of Health Impact Assessment Recommendation: Receive and file. Background: The purpose of this study session is for City’s consultant, McDaniel Lambert/Intrisik, to provide the Council an overview of the Health Impact Assessment (HIA) that was reissued on July 14th for E&B’s proposed Oil Drilling and Production Project. The report is available online http://www.hermosabch.org/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=4473 as well as from the Community Development Department, 1315 Valley Drive. Per the Council’s Strategic Planning Process, Leader’s Guide, Protocol 12, this Work/Study Session Type III Report provides the following topics: Background Information, Discussion of Topics, Explore City’s Role in Need for Action, and Focus on Overall Policy Direction and Guidelines. Discussion of Topics: Conclusions: The HIA evaluated E&B’s proposed Project “post-mitigation” (assuming all mitigation measures in the EIR are implemented) to determine whether the Project could have a negative, positive or no substantial effect on the health of the community. The study does not assess effects on individuals. The HIA considered 17 determinants of health that fall under six categories (air quality, water and soil quality, upset conditions, noise and light emissions, traffic, and community livability). The HIA provides a baseline health profile for the city, assesses the likely impacts, characterizes the health impacts, and provides various recommendations to address potential health effects. The stated conclusion is that “There is no simple answer to the potential impacts that the project will have on the health of Hermosa Beach residents since different aspects of the proposed Project will affect the community in different ways. There are number of aspects of the Project that may positively influence health (e.g., increase education funding, ability to enhance green space) and, and at the same time there were negative health outcomes identified (e.g., odors, aesthetics, property values). With the exception of accidents, the negative health outcomes were largely nuisance based (e.g., odors, aesthetics) without irreversible health impacts. The majority of the health determinants revealed that the Project (post- mitigation) would have no substantial effect on the health of the community. Based on the proposed mitigation measures in the EIR and additional recommendations provided in the HIA, on balance we do not believe that the Project will have a substantial effect on community health in Hermosa Beach.” HIA Recommendations: The HIA recommended several additional mitigations which could be considered for incorporation into the Development Agreement. These are summarized below and are incorporated into the Oil Update agenda item for Council direction. 1. To address potential discomfort and annoyance from odor releases: If frequent reports of odors occur, additional study and/or periodic monitoring of odor may be warranted. Reissued Draft Health Impact AssessmentE&B Oil Drilling and Production ProjectIntrinsik Inc.July 22, 2014 McDaniel Lambert Scientists Examined 18 health determinants in 5 categoriesCharacterized health impacts with numeric scoring systemEvaluated worst-case scenario for each health determinantDifficult for reader to understand rationale behind conclusionsLimited recommendations/monitoringInitial Draft (February 2014) Reissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 McDaniel Lambert Scientists McDaniel Lambert/Intrinsik Scientists & External Peer ReviewerExamined 18 health determinants in 5 categoriesExamined 18 health determinants in 6 categoriesCharacterized health impacts with numeric scoring systemCharacterized health impacts using a standardized evaluation matrix and decision-making framework Evaluated worst-case scenario for each health determinantEvaluated post-mitigation scenario including all EIR measuresDifficult for reader to understand rationale behind conclusions100% transparent with scientific rationale provided Limited recommendations/monitoringComprehensive recommendations, monitoring, and evaluationAddition/change to re-issued HIARe-issued Draft (July 2014) Reissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Name of Presentation Arial 10 pt BlueWho is Intrinsik?Intrinsik is a professional services firm specializing in providing scientific expertise to clients across a wide range of industries.We are recognized as a leader in environmental health, toxicology, risk assessment, and risk management consultation in the United States, Canada and around the world, covering a range of service areas from environmental to pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. OUR PURPOSEHealthy People, Healthy EcosystemsOUR VISIONTo be recognized internationally as a premier employee-owned health and environmental sciences firm.OUR MISSIONTo strive for sustainable company and personal growth while upholding our core values – Science, Integrity, KnowledgeReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Company Background• Science-based consulting firmwith 20+ year corporate history• Private, independent company with offices across Canada (Calgary, Toronto, Guelph, Ottawa, and Halifax and the United States (Portland, Maine and Venice Beach, CA)• We have worked extensively in North America as well as in: Germany, Spain, Italy, Uruguay, Chile, Brazil, Mexico, Egypt, Bermuda, Malaysia, Australia, Peru, China, Japan, Korea, Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, France, UK, Switzerland, Poland, Russia• 75 employees including: two Occupational Medicine Physicians; 11 PhDs; seven Diplomates of the American Board of Toxicology (DABTs); and, three European Registered Toxicologists ( ERTs)Reissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 • Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment• Toxicology and Hazard Assessment• Health Impact Assessment• Integrated Risk Management• Exposure Modeling (deterministic and probabilistic)• Statistics and GIS Mapping• Risk Communication, Public Liaison and Workshop Facilitation• Expert Testimony• Peer Review • Occupational Health and Safety Support and Evaluation• Pesticide Assessment• Threatened and Endangered Species assessmentReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014Key Areas of Expertise: Key Client Sectors:• Power Generation and Green Energy• Government (Federal, State and Local)• Transportation and Infrastructure • Mining• Contaminated Sites• Oil and Gas• Waste Management • Tribes and First Nations• Forestry • Chemical Manufacturing (including pesticides and consumer products)Reissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Intrinsik in the Oil and Gas Sector• Oil & gas work includes Alberta Oil Sands, refineries, oil wells, gas wells, terminals, pipeline projects and Brownfields sites.• Work for Medical Agencies (Sarnia Medical Officer of Health, British Columbia Ministry of Health) to assess potential health impacts associated with petroleum industry.• Work with First Nations in Canada to understand potential health impacts associated with eating wild game and traditional foods in proximity to oil and gas activities.• Review of EIR / Contaminated Sites consulting reports for oil and gas projects on behalf of government agencies.• Intrinsik’s experts have appeared before independent environmental approval agencies, boards, tribunals and courts.Reissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 External Peer ReviewElizabeth Hodges Snyder, MPH, PhD• Soil and water scientist and environmental health practitioner• Interdisciplinary background includes experience in both natural science laboratory and social science research• Research and teaching in the fields of health impact assessment (HIA) and food security• Assessment of Stakeholder engagement and Alaska Native Health• Founder and member of the Steering Committee of the Society of Practitioners of Health Impact Assessment (SOPHIA)Reissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Health DeterminantsAirQualityWater and SoilUpsetScenarioNoise& LightingTraffic Community LivabilityNO2Surface waterCrude oil SpillNoise Safety Property valuesPM Soil particlesWell blowoutLight Perceived hazardsAccess to green spaceTACAestheticsOdor Education fundingSocial cohesionPolitical InvolvementAddition/change to re-issued HIANote: two health determinants removed from re-issued HIA (greenhouse gases and lighting safety) HIA Assessment StepsFor each health determinant:1. Collect data on baseline conditions2. Evaluate and weigh evidence of causal effects3. Quantitative assessment if feasible/appropriate4. Characterize health effectsReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 NegativePositive NeutralApply Decision-Making Framework Evaluation Matrix(based on standarddefinitions) Characterizing Health EffectsReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 HIA Evaluation MatrixParameter DefinitionGeographic Extent How far are the impacts likely to reach?VulnerablePopulationsAre there populations that could be disproportionately affected (positively or negatively) by Project activities?Magnitude What is the extent of the health impact post-mitigation?Adaptability How resilient is the community to this type of change; are they able to adapt?Likelihood What is the probability of the impact occurring based on the expected frequency of the exposure?Post-MitigationHealth EffectWhat is the ‘direction’ of the post-mitigation effect?Reissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Evaluation Matrix DefinitionsReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Evaluation Matrix DefinitionsReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Decision-Making FrameworkMagnitudeAdaptabilityLikelihoodMEDIUMHealth DeterminantHIGHLOWHMLUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRHMLHMLNo Substantial Effect (Neutral)Positive/Negative Neutral/PositivePositive/NegativeDirectional outcomeNon‐directional outcomeH = high; M = medium; L = low; U = unlikely; P = possible; R = probable Evaluation Matrix DefinitionsReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Example: Odor• Unpleasant odors can contribute to a number of physical and psychological/behavioral symptoms• EIR mitigation measures will reduce the number of odor releases, although, detectable offsite odor concentrations could still occur during small upset releases• Magnitude of an adverse health impact from odor is mediumbecause odors will be detectable, and pose a minor to moderate hazard to healthReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Example: OdorMagnitudeAdaptabilityLikelihoodMEDIUMHealth DeterminantHIGHLOWHMLUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRHMLHMLNo Substantial Effect (Neutral)Positive/Negative Neutral/PositivePositive/NegativeDirectional outcomeNon‐directional outcome Example: Odor• Adaptability is considered to be lowsince people are not expected to adapt to odor releasesReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Example: OdorMagnitudeAdaptabilityLikelihoodMEDIUMHealth DeterminantHIGHLOWHMLUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRHMLHMLNo Substantial Effect (Neutral)Positive/Negative Neutral/PositivePositive/NegativeDirectional outcomeNon‐directional outcome Example: Odor• Health symptoms related to odor could occur in sensitive individuals; therefore, likelihood of health impact is considered possibleReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Example: OdorMagnitudeAdaptabilityLikelihoodMEDIUMHealth DeterminantHIGHLOWHMLUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRHMLHMLNo Substantial Effect (Neutral)Positive/Negative Neutral/PositivePositive/NegativeDirectional outcomeNon‐directional outcome Example: OdorMagnitudeAdaptabilityLikelihoodMEDIUMHealth DeterminantHIGHLOWHMLUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRUPRHMLHMLNo Substantial Effect (Neutral)Positive/Negative Neutral/PositivePositive/NegativeDirectional outcomeNon‐directional outcome Example: Odor• The potential odor-related health impact associated with the Project is classified as negative• Odors would be limited to the immediate vicinity of the Site (500 to 1,000 feet) so the geographic extent is expected to be localized• The vulnerable population identified for odor impacts are odor sensitive individuals Reissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Nitrogen DioxideParticulate MatterToxic Air ContaminantsOdorNo Substantial EffectNegativePositiveSurface WaterSoil ParticulatesWell BlowoutCrude Oil SpillNoise Emissions (construction & operations)Noise Emissions (Phase 3 construction)Light EmissionsTraffic SafetyPerceived Traffic HazardsProperty ValuesAesthetics & Visual ResourcesRecreation & Green SpaceEducationFundingSocial Cohesion Political InvolvementAssessment SummaryReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 HIA RecommendationsOdor: if frequent reports of odors occur, additional study and/or periodic monitoring may be warrantedNoise Emissions: provide local residents and schools with written notification (time and duration) of Phase 3 pipeline construction activitiesLight Emissions: provide black-out blinds/curtains for residents with a direct sight line of the exposed side of 87-foot electric drill rig Reissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 HIA RecommendationsProperty Values: conduct a property value analysis to identify potential project-related changes and ensure fluctuations remain within expected local, regional and national levelsRecreation & Green Space: develop a community advisory group to assist the City on how to direct revenue for recreational activities and green spaceReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Nitrogen DioxideParticulate MatterToxic Air ContaminantsOdorNo Substantial EffectNegativePositiveSurface WaterSoil ParticulatesWell BlowoutCrude Oil SpillNoise Emissions (construction & operations)Noise Emissions (Phase 3 construction)Light EmissionsTraffic SafetyPerceived Traffic HazardsProperty ValuesAesthetics & Visual ResourcesRecreation & Green SpaceEducationFundingSocial Cohesion Political InvolvementAssessment SummaryLocalized impactsCommunity-wide benefitsReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Reissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014Overall Conclusion “Based on the proposed mitigation measures in the EIR and additional recommendations provided in the HIA, on balance we do not believe that the Project will have a substantial effect on community health in Hermosa Beach.”Reissued Draft HIA (July 2014) MonitoringCommunity Liaison Committee: CLC would serve as the vehicle through which citizens could voice active concerns about Project activities; committee would work collectively to find ways of addressing concerns. Follow-up Community Health Assessment: Analysis of health statistics by susceptible subpopulation status could identify whether so me groups are disproportionately impacted by Project operations.Quality of Life Health Survey: Establish baseline conditions and monitor whether quality of life measures (e.g., sleep) change during the ProjectReissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014 Reissued Draft Health Impact Assessment, E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project – July 22, 2014Thank you.Dr. Mary McDanielIntrinsikVenice, CaliforniaChristopher Ollson, PhDIntrinsikToronto, Canada